The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
Good News for Trump—Debates Show Democrats REALLY Crazy About Immigration
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The real heart of current Democratic craziness, on plain display in the two debates among Democrat candidates for President this week: the topic of immigration. The candidates left us in no doubt that any enforcement of immigration laws—the people’s laws, passed by Congress properly assembled, according to the Constitution—is inhumane and unacceptable. On this showing, I have to say the quality of the Democrat opposition to Trump is lower than I expected, and his chances correspondingly higher.

The temperature of discussion about immigration had been raised earlier in the week when a young Salvadoran man and his two-year-old daughter were drowned crossing the Rio Grande near Brownsville, Texas. A photograph of their corpses was placed prominently on the front pages of Wednesday’s New York Times and other Progressive outlets.

What had happened, according to the man’s widow, was that husband, wife, and infant had left a poor but comfortable home in El Salvador in hopes of getting asylum in the U.S.A., where they could get better-paying jobs. [‘The river swallowed them’: Widow of Salvadoran father who drowned with their daughter in Rio Grande tells how they decided to make the dangerous crossing after running out of money and how she watched in horror as they were swept away, Daily Mail, June 28, 2019] They’d both had jobs, don’t seem to have been in serious want, and weren’t under any kind of threats or persecution.

I don’t know what grounds they planned to make their asylum claim on. I presume they had some kind of sob story rehearsed.

Anyway, when they got to the U.S. border they were told they faced a long wait because of the surge of asylum-seekers. They had Mexican visas that allowed them to work in Mexico for a year, so they could have waited it out, but decided to swim the river instead. The result followed.

It’s a sad story for sure, but I can’t see how the U.S.A. is at fault. Countries have immigration procedures, and only so many staff to carry them out. What was the border post supposed to do when these Salvadorans showed up—just wave them in?

The answer from this week’s Democratic candidates seems to be: Yes!

None of the so-called moderators—who included such impeccably unbiased persons as Rachel Maddow and Conquistador-American José Díaz-Balart, who works for some Spanish-language TV station and is not to be confused with his brother, GOP Florida congresscritter and Steve Sailer doppelganger Mario Díaz-Balart—asked the obvious questions about this.

Most obvious of all:

Current world population is 7.7 billion. Surveys show that a sizable subset of that number—several hundred million—would like to leave their poor countries and move to richer ones, with the U.S.A. a prime destination. In your opinion, Mr. or Ms. Candidate, is there any upper limit to the number we should allow in?

Of course, nobody asked that. At any rate, searching the two debate transcripts for the word “limit” got no hits.

While I was at it I thought I’d do a search for “Koch,” K-o-c-h, as in “Koch brothers.” I had in mind the memorable reply Bernie Sanders gave to Ezra Klein four years ago when Klein asked him about Open Borders.

Clip: “Open borders? That’s a Koch brothers proposal.”

Didn’t any of the moderators think to remind Bernie of that? Apparently not. I wonder why not…

Beto O’Rourke, Cory Booker, and Julian Castro all threw in a few sentences of Spanish by way of asserting their multicultural credibility. So did one of the so-called moderators, José Díaz-Balart.

So let me say again: I think it’s deplorable for a candidate for public office to address us in a language most of us don’t understand.

I thought so seven years ago in the 2012 campaign when one of the candidates extruded this:

That was Mario Rubio pitching for the Vice-Presidential spot on Mitt Romney’s ticket. He didn’t get it, and I’d like to think that his lapsing into Spanish was one reason he didn’t get it.

The language of our country is English, and our leaders should address us in no other.

John Quincy Adams had lived in Germany and spoke the language fluently, facts that were well-known to the Americans of his time. When he was running for re-election as President in 1828, Adams was asked to address a gathering of German-speaking Americans in German. He refused on principle. Yes, I do know he lost that election; but he was still a better man, certainly a better American, than Marco Rubio.

This country can only work—can only be a country worth the name—under an ethic of relentless assimilation. You settle here, you Americanize yourself, for which the very first step is to master English, so you can join in the national political conversation. John Quincy Adams understood that. My immigrant wife understood it. Marco Rubio does not understand it.

Both Democrat debates were pretty crazy, but O’Rourke, Booker, Castro and Bill de Blasio pushed the Wednesday event well out into Looney Tunes territory. See the transcript here.

The furthest shores of progressive craziness were reached by Castro, who seems to want abortion rights for men. Or perhaps that’s not Peak Crazy. As Greg Cochran pointed out in a tweet:

So I guess we’re not talking total impossibility. Abortions for men is as far into the crazy zone as I personally want to go, though.

Bill de Blasio, New York City’s communist mayor, told us for the 295th time about the Talk he’s felt obliged to give to his mulatto son—you know, the Talk about how dangerous the police are around blacks, liable to shoot them for no reason.

ORDER IT NOW

The numbers on that have been debunked more times than I can remember. De Blasio bringing it up yet again gives me the idea for a column, though. I could write about the Talk that we non-black parents give our kids about the danger of wandering into black neighborhoods and such … Oh, wait.

I can’t remember anything Cory Booker actually said, but there is something about his affect, his mannerisms that brings to mind the guy on your downtown sidewalk ranting about UFOs, the guy you cross over to avoid encountering.

Likewise with Beto O’Rourke; except that while Cory Booker does the crazy act with some conviction—he really believes in those UFOs—O’Rourke just seems to be trying it on for size. Crazy can be shallow or deep: Beto O’Rourke is shallow crazy.

Thursday night’s debate was more grown-up, though not by much. See the transcript here.

One’s vague impression was that Thursday’s candidates actually weremore grown-up—literally, I mean.

The numbers at first seem to confirm that: Wednesday night’s platform had mean age 53.4, Thursday’s 56.5. However, Thursday night’s mean was pulled upwards by the presence of Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, both in their late seventies. The oldest candidate on Wednesday was Elizabeth Warren, just turned 70. The median ages for the two evenings were 53 and 54, so there was no really significant difference there. A little lesson in statistics for all you numbers geeks.

I think it was more a case of Thursday night’s craziness being concentrated in just one of the participants: a person named Marianne Williamson, who I’d never heard of. She seems to be some kind of vanity candidate. She promised to “harness love for political purposes,” and apostrophized the President thus: “I will meet you on that field and, sir, love will win.”

I wish I could have been sitting next to Trump, watching that on TV.

It was of course the grumpy old men who got most of our attention. They didn’t do very well. Bernie Sanders wore his angry face the whole time, and barked and yelled in that way he has, but didn’t say anything we haven’t heard before.

Joe Biden was tossed and gored by Kamala Harris, junior senator from California.

Harris is one of those exotic non-whites who seem to do well in American politics—like Barack Obama. Racially she’s even more exotic than Obama, whose parents were plain-black and plain-white, and only one of them was foreign. Harris’s Dad (right) is a quadroon from Jamaica; her mother is from India, ancestry southern Dravidian-language stock, not the Aryan invaders of the north. [Donald Harris, Kamala Harris’s Father: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know, Heavy.com, February 21, 2019]Kamala Harris had an upper-middle-class upbringing, went to law school, then advanced herself in California politics by the horizontal method with the assistance of Willie Brown, then Speaker of the state Assembly.

The consensus among commentators is that Harris was the star of Thursday’s debate. I’ll allow that as a matter of style: she was vigorous and forceful. Still, she showed maximum vigor and force when laying into Joe Biden on the subject of busing blacks into white schools. Joe, she said, had opposed busing back in the 1970s.

I don’t know if he did or not, but is there really a big constituency out there for the revival of busing—one of the most unpopular policies of the past half century?

I can only suppose that this was part of the effort to take the shine off Joe having been Barack Obama’s Vice President, which is Joe’s main selling point to blacks.

He fumbled and stumbled anyway, and Harris scored points on energy and personality. It’s probable that after a week or two nobody will remember that the actual matter of the exchanges was busing.

To be fair to the Democrats, the debates had some occasional moments of sanity.

Peter Buttigieg, who is Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, went up a couple of ticks in my estimation when Rachel Maddow asked him why the proportion of blacks in South Bend’s police force hadn’t increased during his mayoralty. Replied Buttigieg: “Because I couldn’t get it done.”

You don’t often hear that level of frank candor from a politician. Buttigieg went on to spoil the effect somewhat with some boilerplate blather about “systemic racism”—

I am determined to bring about a day when a white person driving a vehicle and a black person driving a vehicle when they see a police officer approaching feels the exact same thing. A feeling not of fear but of safety.

Given the sensationally higher levels of criminality among blacks, a police officer approaching a vehicle driven by a black person with extra caution is just practicing statistical common sense, like taking an umbrella when you go out on an overcast day. It might not rain, but why take a chance?

Still I’ll allow credit to Peter Buttigieg for his frankness, and to his generally thoughtful demeanor.

Similarly with Andrew Yang, although here we had less to go on. As everyone has pointed out, Yang is a big-ideas guy, and his kind of big ideas don’t condense easily into sound bites. Like Buttigieg, though, he came across as a normal human being that you could have some kind of conversation with, different from Barking Bernie, Jittery Joe, Harpy Harris, or the gal who wants to meet us on the field of love.

Best of all in my opinion: Tulsi Gabbard. That was the opinion of many other viewers, too, to judge from the search results reported afterwards. [First poll has Tulsi Gabbard as the shock winner of the first Democratic debate and Beto O’Rourke as the clear loser,Daily Mail, June 27, 2019]

ORDER IT NOW

Congressgal Gabbard has the advantage of youth: She is the second-youngest in that field of twenty candidates, just nine months older than Peter Buttigieg. She’s also easy on the eye. Not beautiful—she’s a bit too stocky and high-T to be beautiful—but healthy-looking, with pleasant regular features. If you want to explore that aspect of things further, check out her workout video; we posted it on the VDARE.com Twitter feed.

What really made her stand out from the Wednesday night field, though, was her sensible comments about foreign policy. With Iran in the news this past few days, it was mighty refreshing to hear a Democrat say

Donald Trump and his cabinet, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, and others—are creating a situation that just a spark would light off a war with Iran, which is incredibly dangerous. That’s why we need to de-escalate tensions. Trump needs to get back into the Iran nuclear deal and swallow his pride, put the American people first.

I can’t truthfully say I stood up and cheered at that point; but for a few seconds, at least, my eyes stopped rolling.

What did these debates tell us about the prospects for the 2020 Presidential race?

In last week’s podcast I did a rough correlation-of-forces analysis, identifying some major factors that will determine next year’s race, and trying to guess their weight. The first determinative factor, I said, would be the quality of the opposition.

I still think it’s going to be uphill all the way for Trump, against massive bias in the Main Stream Media and social media, and his own disappointing failures, especially on immigration.

I feel better than I did, though.

What gives me most hope is that, based on these two debates, the Democrats, for all their angry energy and rhetorical talent, and for all the solid MSM support they’ll be getting, are missing some key point—a point that Donald Trump, for all his weaknesses and failures, for all his stupid cabinet appointments and broken promises, has grasped.

Watching this week’s Democrat debates, hearing the studio audience whoop and holler as Bernie Sanders railed against Wall Street and “the big money interest[s] who have unbelievable influence over the economic and political life of this country,” I wanted to yell back at him: “YOU’RE MISSING THE POINT!”

Those big-money interests are globalist and internationalist—just like the Democrat-voting college administrators and Corporate HR directors and big-city yuppies. The seriously big-money people, like the bosses of Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, and Google, would have been at home in that debate hall, whooping along with the audience.

And the Republican Party donor elites, the ones Donald Trump defeated in the 2016 primaries, are on the same page.

On the other page are millions of working-class people in Middle America, people whose parents voted Democrat, and perhaps still do out of habit.

Allied with them are don’t-tread-on-me patriots, military and law-enforcement types, evangelicals and gun enthusiasts, at all economic levels, who are fed up with reckless demographic change—who want the country their children live in to bear some reasonably close resemblance to the one their parents lived in.

Red, blue; provincial, metropolitan; nationalist, globalist; The fissures opening up all around us map only very approximately onto our traditional party platforms.

And more approximately with every day that passes.

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him.) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by VDARE.com com: FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT(also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2020 Election, Democratic Party, Immigration 
Hide 56 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. “This country can only work—can only be a country worth the name—under an ethic of relentless assimilation. ”

    This puts Mr.Debyshire clearly on the side of assimilating legal immigrants, not just a reasonable idea but the only reasonable idea. It also puts him squarely against Jared Taylor, who has unequivocally said that he is against immigration.

  2. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fred V. Reed

    And they’ll be “assimilated” how, and to what? The mass culture shallowly rooted in Hollywood and New York? The notion that this country and as much of the rest of the world as possible should be ruled from Washington? That’s what has typified most Americans — including “heritage” Americans — since long before 1965.

    Immigration is said to be an (the) important issue by many contributors to this website. I understand and am sympathetic to the opposition argument based on the effects of an expanded labor pool on wages. But when people are arguing on the basis of race, religion, culture, etc., it’s not clear what they think is at stake.

    I’m posting this in reply to Mr. Reed in the hope that he’ll engage in good faith, rather than ignore or mischaracterize en masse those who disagree.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  3. MEH 0910 says:
    @Fred V. Reed

    Jared Taylor:
    https://www.amren.com/commentary/2019/03/do-they-want-more-christchurch-massacres/

    Do people of certain religions or races assimilate better than others?

    Fred Reed:
    https://www.unz.com/freed/race-hustlers-id-rather-have-ebola/

    It is clear that blacks are as they will be, that they neither will nor can assimilate to European civilization.

    • Replies: @Bugg
  4. MEH 0910 says:

    Red, blue; provincial, metropolitan; nationalist, globalist; The fissures opening up all around us map only very approximately onto our traditional party platforms.

    http://stonetoss.com/comic/opposites-attract/

    • Replies: @Hail
  5. @Fred V. Reed

    Sorry Fred, all immigration has been bad for traditional Americans. Even rootless, wandering vagabonds who write math books like Derbyshire.

    The borders should have been slammed shut to all immigration in 1790.

    • Replies: @animalogic
    , @David In TN
  6. Bugg says:
    @MEH 0910

    To paraphrase Pat Buchanan from not long ago that if you imported 10,000 of my cousins from County Leitrim or Mrs. Derbyshire’s 10,000 cousins from China, they would assimilate considerably better in the US than say, 10,000 of Barack Obama’s Kenyan cousins or 10,000 Saudi princes, or almost anyone from Latin America. Do we get any say in that? The Dems are saying we do not.

  7. SafeNow says:

    John, on the John & Ken radio talk show, after the first debate: I was watching the debate on my iPad, in bed. Elizabeth Warren got her turn. I had to turn it off, and hide under the covers.

    “Hide under the covers” sums-up the entire crew, with the few exceptions Mr. D mentioned. The debate and audience reminded me of the scene in Idiocracy in which the angry, violent president speaks to the howling audience. As Lindsay Graham said during the Kavanaugh hearings, if these people ever take power, watch out.

    • Replies: @Simply Simon
    , @David In TN
  8. Forbes says:
    @Fred V. Reed

    There’s another conclusion one can draw from Derb’s observation: if you’re not going to have an ethic of relentless assimilation, then you can’t have immigration, because the resulting polyglot will be chaotic, divisive, disruptive–essentially anti-civilization.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  9. MEH 0910 says:

    http://southpark.cc.com/clips/154794/garrison-goes-wild

    Garrison Goes Wild

    Mr. Garrison’s Fancy New Vagina s09e01

    Mrs. Garrison assumes that she’s pregnant.

    http://southpark.cc.com/clips/104426/scramble-its-brains-or-vacuum-it-out

    Scramble It’s Brains or Vacuum it Out

    Mr. Garrison’s Fancy New Vagina s09e01

    Mr. Garrison thinks he needs an abortion.

  10. Hail says: • Website

    the quality of the opposition.

    I still think it’s going to be uphill all the way for Trump, against massive bias in the Main Stream Media and social media, and his own disappointing failures, especially on immigration.

    Blumpf deserves to lose, must lose, that we may live.

    I hope people don’t fall into being KushnerTrump2020 cheereladers. Counterproductive.

  11. Hail says: • Website
    @Fred V. Reed

    assimilating legal immigrants [is]the only reasonable idea

    How about reducing legal immigration, encouraging repatriation to countries-of-origin, and letting us live in peace? That seems much more reasonable than continuing to shove ‘immigrants’ on us ad infinitum until there is nothing left of us.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  12. @Forbes

    I see it a little differently: if you’re not going to have an ethic of relentless self-reliance (no “free” health care, education, welfare, subsidized housing, affirmative action, etc.) then you can’t have immigration.

    “Free” stuff is great wealth to the more than half of the world that currently lives in horrid conditions.

  13. Hail says: • Website
    @MEH 0910

    Bottom-left panel: “The Allies,” 1941-1945. (There I said it.)

  14. Just a thought: this is the first time in any democracy that a serious candidate is so well-known for her whoredom.

    Harris is more openly a [email protected] than Linux is Open source…..

  15. @Fred V. Reed

    If I recall correctly, Derb has consistently said that immigration and assimilation should be a “salt in the stew” approach. Only a very, very small proportion of immigrants can be effectively assimilated.

    Derb and Jared Taylor are completely aligned.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  16. Tulsi Gabbard is up for selection
    In the next presidential election.
    Teenage pimps on her face
    Left a permanent trace;
    There’s a song that describes her complexion:

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
  17. Rich says:

    It’s a sad comment on the intelligence of the American people that roughly half the country supports a party that wants to bring in millions of low wage workers who, even if they don’t take their jobs, will suppress wages and use precious government resources they pay for. It’s just common sense that when there are more applicants for a job, the boss can pay less. Scarcity of labor brings about higher wages, better working conditions and a better populace. This is the same party which will include in their 2020 platform a call for reparations to be paid to blacks. Any White person who would vote for a candidate that wants to take their money to give it to people who were never slaves because they may have had an ancestor that was enslaved, is a moron. Plain and simple.

    • Replies: @Rex Little
  18. Thomm says:
    @Fred V. Reed

    who has unequivocally said that he is against immigration.

    Jared Taylor is not opposed to skilled immigration, in small amounts.

    • Agree: TTSSYF
  19. Daniel H says:

    Derb,

    It doesn’t matter how crazy the Dems are on immigration because the Republicans will line themselves just a little to the right of the Democrats and people will stupidly grant them their votes, while the Republican position itself will be a disaster. The real problem is the Republicans. We give these faithless Cucks our vote and they betray us every time.

    The better thing for 2020 is to start a national movement, expressly set up to DENY the Republicans the Presidency and Congress because of their repeated betrayal of their base. The movement will not advocate voting for the Democrats, the movement will just encourage bad-whites to stay home and deny the Republicans office. Post election analysis will reveal that the Republicans lost because the bad-whites stayed home. The bad-whites were the margin of victory. The Cucks are so stupid, so corrupt that even this might not alter their behavior but at the very least history will note, and we will derive a little satisfaction knowing the the very world of the Cucks has gone down the hole.

    #say_no_to_Cucks
    #destroy_all_Cucks

  20. anon19 says:

    Here in Canada our Jewish media tried to portray the deaths of these two as some kind of “horror” for which Trump was responsible for. F*** that. Why any white person would vote for the democrats – the party of race replacement of whites – is beyond me.

  21. anon[368] • Disclaimer says:

    ““This country can only work—can only be a country worth the name—under an ethic of relentless assimilation. ” This puts Mr.Debyshire clearly on the side of assimilating legal immigrants, not just a reasonable idea but the only reasonable idea. It also puts him squarely against Jared Taylor, who has unequivocally said that he is against immigration.”

    Does it? Implied in your response is that the author thinks we should assimilate “legal” immigrants who continue to arrive. However, the author very well might have meant that he wants to assimilate those who are already here. That’s not the same thing. In any case, it won’t work; you are mistaken to think otherwise – likely biased by your residence in Mexico. Assimilation can no longer work now that a certain demographic threshold has been passed: the foreign born percentage of the population rivals levels not seen since deep into the last century and most of the country’s current foreign born are non-European, and therefore nearly impossible to assimilate into the host culture outside of fast food and trash culture. There’s frankly nothing left to assimilate into anyway that’s larger than themselves, so people are reverting back to pre-nationhood immediate loyalties: tribe, sect, kin.

    The new crop of immigrants has been brainwashed by the economic elite for decades into hating the country’s white core (and increasingly Asians, too); they seethe with envy over the core’s historical achievements and the core’s current success that they believe they can never match themselves; they boil over with rage with every perceived slight, hence the use of slurs like “white supremacy” and “white privilege” to deflect their true, racist motivations. It would take decades and extraordinary effort to reverse this. But it won’t happen. The US has passed the point of no return and is now destined to become unstable, perhaps sooner than anyone thought if these debates are any indication – destroy private healthcare, free money for all, identity politics, mass invasion decriminalized (in a repeat of the run up to the Spanish Civil War, the NYT is running op-eds supporting the doxxing – targeted violence – of border patrol officers). What the US needs is an Augustus Caesar; the US needs a wise, right-wing but disinterested, genius to rise above it all and set the nation back on a path towards stability, probably by force. What we have at the moment is a cartoon character and his Loony Tunes praetorian guard. What we are likely to get in the new decade is Hugo Chavez … or worse.

  22. @Chris Mallory

    Perhaps the borders should have slammed shut from, say, Jamestown onwards? That was a pretty reasonable foray into an ugly mess-up… Kind of fits with today….

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  23. @Hail

    “and letting us live in peace? ”
    Couldn’t agree more. But take the next steps — make them want to stay home or go home. So, transfer a couple of hundred billion from the “defence” budget to use in a Marshall style investment program in places like Hondurous. Engage in fair trade.
    Stop supporting foreign right wing dictators & oligarchs.
    Stop-stop-stop sanctioning !
    AND stop-stop-stop threatening & attacking everyone who blinks sides-ways at you.
    And, I suspect, it will be CHEAPER in the long run.

    • Replies: @Hail
  24. How to account for people with average and above IQ’s advocating open borders? Indoctrination. We have a critical mass of people who urgently need De-programing. I pity the candidates who believe their own bullshit. Those who are merely pandering would rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.

    Tulsi on immigration:

    Relax onerous visa requirements for Indian & Chinese tourism
    In Congress, I will fight to relax the onerous and overly burdensome visa requirements for visitors coming from countries such as China and India. The present policies are outdated and do not reflect the fact that China and India now have booming economies and a burgeoning middle class. These people have money in their pockets and are eager to see the world. Many of them want to visit Hawai`i, but because it’s so hard for them to get tourist visas, they end up going elsewhere. The beaches of Bali, Thailand, and Vietnam are teeming with big-spending Chinese tourists. If we can get these visitors to come to Hawai`i instead, it will have an immediate and significant impact on Hawai`i’s tourism industry.

    She seems healthy, sane and intelligent. A rose among the thorns. I hope to vote for her in the Texas Primary, But I cannot vote for any Democrat in the General Election. I’m a white man.

  25. @Fred V. Reed

    the side of assimilating legal immigrants

    “Assimilating” how? With sharp sticks? Electroshock? Re-education camps? Or the honor system we’ve been using under all the civnats which has landed us in this cesspit?

  26. @WorkingClass

    She’s probably the first to run for President on the pro-India platform. Doesn’t seem to be a winning strategy.

    Weirdly, her extensive entry at Infogalactic has nothing on her feelings toward Israel.

    • Replies: @T.T
  27. I am determined to bring about a day when a white person driving a vehicle and a black person driving a vehicle when they see a police officer approaching feels the exact same thing. A feeling not of fear but of safety.

    This is more of their weird-ass bad screenwriting fantasies, like a really poor attempt at satirizing 50’s TV. Many white people feel plenty of fear when a cop is approaching.

    “White people” and “cops” aren’t all covert operatives in some Masonic club where you give the secret handshake and all the problems melt away. Many, many white people have suffered mightily at the hands of the police. Only shitlibs with their obsessive delusions that life is perfect for whites and an endless hellscape for everyone else believe such arrant rubbish.

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
  28. nickels says:

    Triple melting pot: within three generations every immigrant family will either be gay, transgender, or hooked on fentanyl.
    There will be no fourth generation.

  29. TTSSYF says:

    She’s also easy on the eye. Not beautiful—she’s a bit too stocky and high-T to be beautiful—but healthy-looking, with pleasant regular features.

    Rather harsh, wouldn’t you say, to conclude that she’s high-T without reviewing any bloodwork?

    I think I understand why Derbyshire married an Asian woman. He reminds me of one of my male co-workers, who once said, regarding Asian women, “They just seem like real girls!”

  30. TTSSYF says:
    @animalogic

    I would settle for the immigration policy we had prior to it being changed in 1965.

  31. joe2.5 says:

    “The language of our country is English, and our leaders should address us in no other.”
    That’s more than stupid. Why can’t you stick to your point, which has some merit, and avoid destroying everything with this kind of irrelevant crap? Typical Englishman, proud of ignoring the practice of most civilized countries.

  32. unit472 says:

    I was stunned when every Democrat candidate raised their hand to indicate they approved of giving free health care to ILLEGAL immigrants. That should put paid to the Democrats winning in 2020 if the people of this country have not gone insane.

    I am finally eligible for Medicare so health insurance only costs me a couple of hundred dollars from my Social Security check and another couple of hundred out of pocket for supplementary insurance to cover what Medicare doesn’t. I can afford it but still, that is $400 plus dollars a month I must pay to guard against being bankrupted by a hospital. For younger people not eligible for Medicare or Medicaid it can be a lot more expensive. I don’t think many of them looking at the hole in their paychecks that medical insurance creates are going to be amused by the Democrats advocating ‘free’ medical care for ILLEGAL immigrants or even Medicaid for Legal immigrants.

    BTW why not just administer IQ tests to those seeking to immigrate with a cutoff point of 115 or above. If you are not above average what can you offer us that we don’t already have?

  33. Rich says:
    @unit472

    You would think that people would understand the extremely high costs associated with providing not only health care, but other resources to illegals would deter Americans from supporting the dems. But I have a brother-in-law, who pays over $700 a month, plus high co-pays for his company insurance, who supports open borders. He believes it’s a “basic human right” for people to be allowed to live wherever they want.These people are insane.

  34. T.T says:
    @Oleaginous Outrager

    Interesting observation. She is ahead of her time I guess, the top Indian casts are settling in the Anglosphere with a dose of clannishness unseen by the early Irish or jews which took hold of the Anglosphere. We can see they are leapfrogging into the top position at the tech companies and keep bringing in more of themselves. Meanwhile, the top percentile Jews are dying out, either by having a very low birthrate or intermarrying with anything really, though the top is going for Chinese.

    with which ethnic groups are the Indians in the anglosphere marrying?

    I foresee a powerful Indian faction in the west positioning themselves as competitors of the Jewish factions. Perhaps less in entertainment but definitely in tech and other corporations. I don’t think the Chinese faction will have a powerful voice outside of China. They are too agreeable and not clannish enough. Though the resulting hapas might be something.

    • Replies: @Daniel H
  35. @SafeNow

    Yea, I agree it’s “hide under the covers” scary out there. What’s really scary is these lunatic leftists do not realize they are insane. But then does any insane person believe himself to be insane?

  36. @the one they call Desanex

    Just now,I discovered there’s some kind if treatment for acne called “Tulsi.” Weird,innit?

  37. @Father O'Hara

    That is pretty weird and ironic, Father. I never heard of any other thing or person called tulsi, just acne medicine and a gal who could’ve used it.

  38. @Oleaginous Outrager

    Mal Evans was a friend of and longtime roadie for the Beatles. In later years he developed mental health problems. One day he was acting badly and his family called LAPD. Bad idea. They wound up shooting him to death. Be careful.

  39. @Chris Mallory

    Years ago, I exchanged emails with a prominent writer on the subject who said almost all immigration has been disastrous since around 1820.

  40. @SafeNow

    “As Lindsey Graham said during the Kavanaugh hearings, if these people ever take power, watch out.”

    Well, “these people” will have the white house and both houses of congress one of these days.

  41. Daniel H says:

    “As Lindsey Graham said during the Kavanaugh hearings, if these people ever take power, watch out.”

    Pansy Graham, by cucking out, encouraging more and more mass migration has been doing his damnedest to get “these people” into power. And once in power, they will never relinquish it.

    Pansy Graham is a cuck. I prefer anybody to him, even a wacko Democrat.

    Say no to Cucks

    #say_no_to_Cucks
    #destroy_all_Cucks

  42. Daniel H says:
    @T.T

    Meanwhile, the top percentile Jews are dying out, either by having a very low birthrate or intermarrying with anything really, though the top is going for Chinese.

    In a few generations, the Jew-Chinese marital alliance will be seen as a strategic error by the the Jews, and the Chinese won’t give a damn.

    There will never be a Jew-Indian marital alliance because Indians do believe that they are superior, not just to Jews, but to everybody else.

  43. Hail says: • Website
    @animalogic

    AND stop-stop-stop threatening & attacking everyone

    That’s the Neocons (a hostile elite) (or whatever this gang’s successor label is), not us.

  44. Hail says: • Website

    An excellent political cartoon satirizing the Dem Debates, for the attention of Mr. Derbyshire and his readers:

  45. dfordoom says: • Website
    @anonymous

    And they’ll be “assimilated” how, and to what? The mass culture shallowly rooted in Hollywood and New York? The notion that this country and as much of the rest of the world as possible should be ruled from Washington? That’s what has typified most Americans — including “heritage” Americans — since long before 1965.

    A very good point. What use is assimilation when the host culture is worthless trash culture?

    The assimilationist dinosaurs like Derbyshire still believe it’s the 1950s and there’s something worthwhile to assimilate to.

  46. dfordoom says: • Website
    @WorkingClass

    How to account for people with average and above IQ’s advocating open borders?

    Self-interest. Immigration is good for a lot of white people. It’s fantastic for rich white people. It’s extremely good for small business owners – without immigration they would have to pay decent wages. It’s great for farmers – they can get their crops harvested by paying immigrants starvation wages. It’s good for white who work in the bureaucracy – the more immigrants you have the more bureaucrats you need. It’s good for rich urban whites – they get interesting restaurants and the prices are cheap because the staff at those interesting ethnic restaurants get very low wages. It’s good for white homosexuals – there are more exotic strangers to have disgusting anonymous sex with.

    And these kinds of white people are generally not the ones whose neighbourhoods or towns get trashed by immigrants. How many Somalis have been settled in Malibu?

    That’s why so many white people support immigration and vote for pro-immigration parties. Whites vote out of self-interest. They are selfish ands short-sighted and they don’t give a damn if the country goes down the toilet as long as they personally are doing OK.

    That’s why immigration restrictionists lose every time. A huge number of whites (maybe 40%) believe that they will benefit from immigration.

    White people are the ones destroying white nations.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    , @WorkingClass
  47. peterAUS says:
    @dfordoom

    Immigration is good for a lot of white people. It’s fantastic for rich white people. It’s extremely good for small business owners – without immigration they would have to pay decent wages. It’s great for farmers – they can get their crops harvested by paying immigrants starvation wages. It’s good for white who work in the bureaucracy – the more immigrants you have the more bureaucrats you need. It’s good for rich urban whites – they get interesting restaurants and the prices are cheap because the staff at those interesting ethnic restaurants get very low wages.

    Yep.

    Whites vote out of self-interest. They are selfish ands short-sighted and they don’t give a damn if the country goes down the toilet as long as they personally are doing OK.
    A huge number of whites (maybe 40%) believe that they will benefit from immigration.

    Hehehe…..don’t say.

    White people are the ones destroying white nations.

    A heretical thought here. It’s supposed to be “Dem Joos”.
    No wonder, a?

  48. @Steve in Greensboro

    Derb and Taylor are aligned in that both are degenerate cucks.

    Derb’s Chinese family is not “salt in the stew.” His Chinese family is a fifth column. The Chinese wife and daughter voted for Obummer. They had to put the Chinese son in the army because they could not handle him.

    Derbyshire is always complaining about blacks: https://vdare.com/posts/derbyshire-rules-in-toronto-and-the-future-of-the-west Yet, he has not had the “talk” with his Chinese wife and daughter about blacks.

    The Chinese mother is looking for a Chinese wife for the son. These people will never assimilate. Derbyshire and his family have to go back to China. These people are a toxin in the West.

  49. @dfordoom

    They are selfish ands short-sighted and they don’t give a damn if the country goes down the toilet as long as they personally are doing OK.

    What a relief. I was afraid they might be stupid.

  50. @unit472

    BTW why not just administer IQ tests to those seeking to immigrate with a cutoff point of 115 or above. If you are not above average what can you offer us that we don’t already have?

    If they are above average, what can they offer us that we don’t already have? There are, I don’t know, let’s say 500 million people in the world who could jump the 115 IQ bar. Does that mean we should lay out the red carpet for them so we can have a USA of 800 million people?

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  51. @Vegan Shark

    “There are, I don’t know, let’s say 500 million people in the world who could jump the 115 IQ bar. ”

    You’re admitting you don’t know and hypothesizing that 500 million people with IQ ratings are currently applying for citizenship. That obviously isn’t the case, nor is it at all likely.

  52. KenH says:

    The Democrats are literally insane on immigration but the bad news for Trump is that about half of America’s electorate is just as insane, so twenty years ago insanity on immigration would guarantee a loss for the Democrats but in today’s interesting times they could still win in 2020.

    The media clearly is biased in favor of Kamala Harris and is trying to clear a path for her much like they did for Obama in 2008. That’s why they keep running hit pieces on Biden. If Bernie gets to number one or two then they’ll be hit pieces on him.

  53. Truth says:

    The media clearly is biased in favor of Kamala Harris and is trying to clear a path for her much like they did for Obama in 2008. That’s why they keep running hit pieces on Biden. If Bernie gets to number one or two then they’ll be hit pieces on him.

    …”Duh man always holdin’ me down…”

  54. @Rich

    roughly half the country supports a party that wants to bring in millions of low wage workers

    Roughly half? More like “nearly all”, since both the Republican and Democratic parties fit that description.

  55. Mr. Anon says:
    @Fred V. Reed

    That’s a false non-equivalence. One can believe that immigration should be reduced, even stopped, and believe that immigrants who are already here should assimilate. In fact, Mr. Derbyshire has often argued for greatly reducing immigration levels.

  56. @unit472

    The polls show a major of Democrats support free healthcare for illegal aliens.

    I confirmed that the polls are reasonable by talking with goodwhite registered Democrat “friends and family” over the weekend.

    They want free healthcare, food, shelter, education, etc. for all illegal aliens.

    That is what the major media has told them they want, so that is what they want.

    If anyone had any doubts that the Democrats will turn the country into a third world dumpster–quickly–those doubts should be erased _now_.

    (The Republicans plan to bring the country to ruin–slowly–hopefully slowly enough so I won’t live to see it.)

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS