The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
Electoral Gold for the Stupid Party—the Anti-Anti-White Vote
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
mawa

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The midterm elections this coming Fall are shaping up to be really interesting, culturally as well as politically.

The political question is of course whether the Republican Party will lose control of the House and/or the Senate.

Current pollster wisdom is: Yes, the GOP will likely lose the House, but probably not the Senate. There are plausible alternative scenarios, though, that have Republicans holding on to both chambers, although with a reduced majority in the House. [What Happens If Republicans Keep Control Of The House And Senate?, By Perry Bacon Jr., FiveThirtyEight, May 22, 2018]

That would be interesting. As you’ve heard if you pay attention to party politics at all, the first midterms generally go badly for the party of a new President. For Republicans to maintain control of Congress would be a surprise.

The political rules are not what they once were though: “once” there meaning prior to … oh, let’s say, November 8th, 2016. Donald Trump’s victory rewrote the rule book. Surprises are no longer as surprising as they used to be.

The issue raised by a Republican victory in the midterms would be: Is the Sailer Strategy now seriously in play?

The Sailer Strategy is the one proposed by our own Steve Sailer back in November of 2000. That year’s presidential election, George W. Bush v. Al Gore, had culminated in a very narrow win for Bush in the Electoral College, followed by a messy squabble over vote recounts in Florida.

Dubya’s main problem, Steve argued after crunching the numbers, was that he had only won 54 percent of the white vote. If he had got just three percent more, 57 percent, he would have won in an electoral college landslide, even allowing for some alienation of the non-white vote.

Money quote from Steve:

The GOP could win more elections by raising its fraction of the white vote minimally than by somehow grabbing vastly higher fractions of the minority vote.

GOP Future Depends on Winning Larger Share of the White Vote, November 28, 2000

Of course, that is only true while whites are a big majority of the electorate, as they still were in the year 2000. They are still a majority, although less of one than eighteen years ago. The Sailer Strategy is still viable; and with sensible patriotic immigration reform it will continue to be so.

The underlying cultural question here is: Is the worm turning?

Are an electorally significant number of white Americans fed up with the anti-white propaganda, the appeals to white guilt, that have dominated public discourse for the past generation? If so, are they sufficiently fed up to swing an election? The 2016 result suggests that they may be.

Back of that is a larger question. One of the most under-appreciated books of the past twenty years has been Eric Kaufmann’s The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America, published in 2004. Kaufmann argues that there has been a tension in the collective American psyche between, on the one hand, the universalist ideals implicit in the founding documents, and on the other, the ethnic self-awareness of the WASP ascendancy. That tension was resolved, he says, in the middle twentieth century by a decisive rejection of white-European ethnonationalism in favor of cosmopolitan universalism.

Nothing lasts for ever in human affairs. Hence the larger question: Is white America, or some politically consequential portion of it, now alienated from that universalism? If so, what will they turn to?

The Social Justice Warriors of course have a ready answer for that. Unmoored from cosmopolitan universalism, they tell us, white Americans will revert to being cross-burning, hood-wearing, neo-Nazi yahoos.

All that illustrates is the utter poverty of imagination on the political Left. In their minds, the only possible future is a reprise of the past.

A revival of the WASP ascendancy is likewise out of the question. That ascendancy was anyway undermined from the middle nineteenth century on by the great waves of non-Anglo-Saxon, non-Protestant Europeans settling in the USA.

But perhaps a more generalized white-identity consciousness will take hold. That would be better than the white ethnomasochism we are currently awash in, but not something I personally would welcome whole-heartedly. A nation of endlessly-squabbling identity groups would, it seems to me, be a dismal thing.

My own ideal: a racial and ethnic super-majority, tolerant and hospitable to small minorities of others: what I call “salt-in-the-stew diversity.” A little salt in the stew improves it; too much spoils it. Numbers, numbers, numbers.

Here’s a commentator who agrees with me: the guy—we know it’s a guy—who dwells anonymously in Château Heartiste.

Now, Heartiste isn’t to everyone’s taste. His language is rococo, often crude, sometimes anti-Semitic. If you are not too repelled, though, and persevere with him, there are pearls of wisdom in there.

Here was Heartiste in recent post:

Personally, I don’t relish a society structured solely around identity politics. It’s gauche, claustrophobic, miserably stressful, and a mockery of the transcendent. But damned if I’m gonna idly sit by as every other group looks out for themselves at my group’s expense. That’s a suicide pact. But the only way out of this inevitability is to restore Whites to demographic primacy in their homelands, from which perch Whites can safely and confidently eschew identity politics without risk of parasitic infection.

My idea of a great country to live in: One that’s so explicitly homogeneous that these implicit identity conundrums never need addressing.

[ The Double-Edged Sword Of Identity Politics , May 23, 2018]

I’ll sign on to that.

That’s taking the large cultural view of things. To return to immediate politics, what we likely have is a swelling number of white Americans who, while not locked into any real kind of white-identity mindset, are definitely anti-anti-white—sick of hearing themselves, their families, and their ancestors belittled and insulted.

While the Democratic Party is committed to anti-white positions, that swelling number of anti-anti-white whites is electoral gold for the Republican Party.

Whether the Republican Party—also commonly known, let me remind you, as the Stupid Party—has enough sense and skill to mine that gold, is an open question.

There are some hopeful signs from the White House, although that is of course not the same thing as the Republican Party.

Hopeful signs, none the less: Senior presidential adviser Stephen Miller, in an interview with Breitbart News this week, promised that Trump will go into the midterms with an aggressive strategy on immigration both legal and illegal.

The National Question is, as I said last week, a hundred-dollar bill lying on the sidewalk for the GOP to pick up. Will they have the wit and courage to pick it up, in the teeth of opposition from their donors in the cheap-labor lobbies?

We shall find out in November.

2010-12-24dl[1] John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by VDARE.com com:FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Immigration, Republican Party, Sailer Strategy 
Hide 138 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. bartok says:

    The National Question is, as I said last week, a hundred-dollar bill lying on the sidewalk for the GOP to pick up.

    This was true before 2016 but is no longer true. When both parties were for open borders, the voters widely opposed it. When the GOP switched with Trump, partisan reflexes moved many voters left or right. Now immigration is a normal wedge issue, (long may it remain so).

    The idea that the GOP could turn restrictionist without creating a wedge issue now seems naive. There’s some uncertainty principle at work – when the elites are united, the voters can unite against them; but when the elites break rank, the voters mirror them and run right or left.

  2. RE: Chateau Heartiste

    That’s what life is like in Japan. They don’t have to play identity politics, because, well…

    Life in the Shire is lovely.

    • Replies: @SMK
  3. Will they have the wit and courage to pick it up, in the teeth of opposition from their donors in the cheap-labor lobbies?

    A rhethorical question if ever there was one.

    • Replies: @HoneyBear
  4. I like Mr Derbyshire’s “salt in the stew”. His Numbers, numbers, numbers” is also spot on.
    I would have thought US citizen s might legitimately ask: when is enough (people) enough ? Is a US population of say 400 million desirable ?
    This is in addition to any questions of social
    composition.
    A nation requires a reasonable degree of cultural homogeneity to remain functional.
    Identity politics is, deliberately, an attack on such homogeneity. Useful idiots for the divide & rulers…

    • Replies: @Randal
    , @pyrrhus
  5. Anon[183] • Disclaimer says:

    Sorry to hear of your pets ill health Derb. A great posting from Steve, referencing Dr. Johnson, when Steve’s rabbit died (a rabbit! Is Steve meshugga?) might ease the pain.

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/our-rabbit-2004-2016-rip/

  6. Randal says:
    @animalogic

    A nation requires a reasonable degree of cultural homogeneity to remain functional.
    Identity politics is, deliberately, an attack on such homogeneity. Useful idiots for the divide & rulers…

    But, as the comment attributed above to Chateau Heartiste points out, decrying and abstaining from identity politics for your own group whilst other identity groups merrily engage in it means only one result – endless defeats for your disarmed identity group to the benefit of those other groups ruthlessly engaging in identity politics. And that indeed has been the history of the past few decades in the countries of the US sphere.

    Identity politics is thus the inevitable result in a society that is not significantly homogenous – culturally and racially. If you don’t like it, the people to blame are not those seeking to adopt identity politics as a defensive response to its adoption by “minority” groups, but rather those who, for their own personal, business or group interests, fostered and promoted the increasing diversity that is at the root of the problem, and continue to do so.

    As for “Useful idiots for the divide & rulers”, again if this is directed at those advocating identity politics as a necessary defensive response then it is only playing into the hands of the minority identity lobbyists and their enablers who are the source and cause of the problem.

    • Replies: @animalogic
    , @Svigor
  7. Anonymous[135] • Disclaimer says:

    America was NOT founded on “universalist” values.

    • Replies: @Curle
  8. Thank f*** someone else is trying to popularize the term “anti-anti-white.” Sure, it’s a bit of a mouthful, but my bet is that anyone who has ever been subjected to even short bursts of SJW-style anti-white horseshit will understand immediately what you’re getting at. (And having understood it, what kind of a braindead bozo would you have to be to resist it? Jump on board!)

    And the best thing about it is: you don’t even have to be white to be anti-anti-white. Theoretically, you could even be black. (Although, personally, I kinda like the vague implication that anti-anti-white is, to some degree or another, anti-black. It’s just necessary to safeguard the quality of life on this planet. You know how pretty much everywhere on earth today is at least implicitly anti-white? Well, in just that way, the planet will have to eventually become at least implicitly anti-black.)

    Now, jaundiced white activists are sure to pipe up to tell me that will never be (white activists’ pessimism rivals the certainty of death and taxes), but I think there really is – finally – good reason for optimism.

    First of all, as Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents likes to say, the most potent weapon in the WN arsenal is the truth. (Well, yes and no. Yes, in the sense that ‘racists’ are largely correct about racial differences and that it’s better to have a culture which celebrates your racial existence than one which denigrates it; but no, that this somehow implies an all-white America across every square inch of US territory.) But forget WNs. The truth retains its tremendous potency even with respect to anti-anti-whites’ much more limited objectives. And the truth is something that anyone can tell – even non-whites.

    Secondly, and contra WN’s inflated charges, not all non-whites actually hate whites. And when they do, it’s usually not whites per se they hate, it’s white – dare I say it – racism. But real racism, in your face racism, not the fanciful nonsense that ‘studies’ departments concoct. Whites are big racial pussies today, but wasn’t it all that long ago that they were not shy at all about letting other races know how little they thought of them. That leaves a bad taste in the mouth and it’s something no one wants to be – and no one should be – subjected to. And most whites, I think, are sincerely sorry for it. My guess is that more and more non-whites are either realizing this, or could, with a helping hand, quickly come to realize it. So if whites aren’t all that bad, why not stand up for them? Non-black non-whites routinely stand up for blacks, and often they don’t even like blacks. Imagine what they could accomplish for people they often genuinely like!

    Thirdly, anyone (except maybe blacks) with a strong emotional connection to American culture has to, if he’s honest, accept that it’s largely a European creation. And if he’s even more honest, that it’s all the better for it. If you like the culture, it’s only a short hop to liking the people who created it and who still largely sustain it – meaning you’ll defend those people against mindless, malicious attacks. American cultural nationalism therefore has no choice but to be anti-anti-white.

    All of this is a boon to the Sailer Strategy, and helps greatly to make up for the fact that whites are a declining proportion of the electorate. SJWs, BLM, ISIS – I guess Sailer Strategists shouldn’t look a gift horse in the mouth.

    • Replies: @Samuel Skinner
    , @KenH
  9. But the only way out of this inevitability is to restore Whites to demographic primacy in their homelands, from which perch Whites can safely and confidently eschew identity politics without risk of parasitic infection.

    Realistically, the only way that is going to occur is for America to revive Latin American-style blanqueamiento (‘whitening’) policies. This implies neither white ‘supremacy’ nor white ‘purity.’ It just means that over time the population is going be growing ‘whiter’ – there may be fewer ‘pure’-looking whites, but that is supposed to be counterbalanced by there being even fewer obvious non-whites.

    Would a ‘white’ population necessarily result from this? One way to get at an answer is to revive a concept created by Richard McCulloch some years ago – ‘racial average.’ This is a hypothetical concept which requires giving every person in a population a ‘whiteness’ score, say from 0-100 (least to most white). So someone as white as Dolph Lundgren would get a score of 100, while someone on the most distant margins of what could fairly be called white, like say Ralph Macchio (the Karate Kid), might get 85 (this is eminently contestable, of course) – which would theoretically be the cut-off point for ‘whiteness’, and then anyone under this score would not be white, but their score is still important because it determines whether the child they produce by mixing with a white could be considered white or not. So Derbyshire’s 50-50 white-asian mixed kids could receive a score of 60, just based on what we know about the phenotypes of 75-25 white-asian people, while a black-mix 50-50 mix might only receive a score of 20, based on what we know of 75-25 white-black phenotypes. And so on down the line.

    So once you’ve got all these scores, you total them up and divide by the number of people in the population and the result tells you whether, if everyone were to mix with everyone, you’d have a white population or not. As McCulloch says, racial average is racial destiny – the racial ‘look’ your population is breeding towards. Using the above logic where 85 was the cut-off for whiteness, if your population average is 80, well, you’d know you’re breeding towards a non-white racial destiny. Not massively non-white, of course; just non-white enough to be called non-white.

    So what racial destiny is America looking at given today’s numbers? Well, as a ballpark estimate, let’s use the following: 200 million whites at 95 whiteness; 55 million hispanics at 60 whiteness, 40 million blacks at 5 whiteness; 20 million Asians at 15 whiteness; 15 million hybrids at 50 whiteness. Totaling these up and dividing by 330 million gives a 71 whiteness score, and this is probably an upper bound, considering that: non-white immigration continues; whites are more elderly; and that some of the whiteness scores may be optimistic. So America is quite convincingly staring at a non-white racial destiny.

    The only thing that could avert this destiny is the creation of a fertility differential favoring whites. If those with a whiteness score above the threshold for being considered ‘white’ have a higher fertility than those below the threshold, then the racial average could begin increasing. It is, however, difficult to see why this should happen without there being incentives to encourage it. In a society as rife with anti-white assumptions as America, it’s difficult to see how such incentives might be created. So while talk of ‘demographic primacy’ and ‘some salt in the stew diversity’ may be encouraging because it’s politically more achievable and morally more palatable, it is, without some severe cultural shifts, all rather fallacious. It is but another attempt to evade racial reality, rather than to courageously confront it.

  10. @Randal

    I dispute that identity politics was inevitable – to the extent at least that anything can be said to lack inevitability.
    Identity politics is the bastard offspring of neoliberalism & self interested middle class academics & bureaucrats.
    Identity politics became, firstly, the flaccid response to Thatcherism etc, then a cynical manipulation by elites.
    It’s primary function ? To distort the fact that the 99% have common interests worth fighting for.

  11. Though I agree with CH’s and Mr. Derbyshire’s general point, there’s lots that I don’t agree with in this column. I’ll start with the first and biggest one – party politics.

    Why are we supposed to be so optimistic again due to the “re-writing of the rule book”? Oh, we may be able to have a GOP “controlled House AND Senate after 2018? Wow! THAT’S WHAT WE HAVE NOW!. It’s not doing us a whole lot of good, is it? No, and that’s not because they are the STUPID party. Most of them are after the same Globalist goals as the blue wing of THE PARTY. There is plenty of evil in both squads of the party.

    If Trump has not been compromised by the Deep State, then he’s not sending his best TWEETS, put it that way. He could easily rally Americans to primary-out the bad apples (lots of them) and impeach the judges that legislate from the bench. Americans would have defined way to help defeat The Party. No, but this guy is busy writing tweets about his abilitiy to kick Joe Biden’s ass or something.

    Nope, having GOP majorities means absolutely nothing. It’s been 1 1/2 years running, and they haven’t got anything done for Americans.

    • Agree: Mishra, renfro
  12. The Social Justice Warriors of course have a ready answer for that. Unmoored from cosmopolitan universalism, they tell us, white Americans will *revert* to being cross-burning, hood-wearing, neo-Nazi yahoos

    All that illustrates is the utter poverty of imagination on the political Left. In their minds, the only possible future is a reprise of the past.

    That irks the crap. out of me. Have you bought into this narrative, Mr. Derbyshire, that that WAS the past? White Americans were a bunch of cross-burning, hood-wearing neo Nazi yahoos? That’s what you are implying here. There was a whole lot more to the Southern “Reconstruction” era than you seem to know about. Some of the actions were completely justified, but this was all a small segment of population in a small segment of time.

    Maybe you meant “a reprise of the past (in their minds). To me, that would clarify your writing, and I’d have to say “nevermind” here.

  13. Lastly, I know you are a numbers guy (I’d think, though I know the higher math isn’t “numbers”). You’ve got to realize we are way past the “salt in the stew” phase. American has let in so many groups in large enough numbers that for lots of them (Chinese, Moslems, Chicano), they are beyond the point of needing to assimilate. They run their own show wherever they exist in large groups.

    Just how do you propose we get BACK to the “salt in the stew” situation from the “e. coli in the broccoli” situation we are in now?

    I suppose, if the US doesn’t balkanize in the meantime, which is very likely, in 100 years or so all the varied diverse groups could possibly assimilate each other in various ways.

    • Replies: @SMK
  14. @Achmed E. Newman

    All quite true, but I would just point out that the Sailer Strategy isn’t restricted to the GOP. Ideally, the ‘nationalist’ faction of the GOP would breakaway and create a third party – you could even call it the National Party – and implement the Sailer Strategy. It would necessarily have to start small, but as Ross Perot showed, there is more potential for a third party (that hits the right note) than is commonly recognized.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  15. the gop politicians that are selling out their white voters are not stupid. They are smart. These politicians get paid to sell us out..how do they get paid? Well, they get via access to IPO’s, sweetheart contract deals, and insider trading tips…have you seen the net worth of these gop politicians?

    Selling out your voters to get rich is not stupid–it’s smart. They changed the laws some time ago so that it is quite difficult now to get nailed on this sort of corruption.

    And then selling the idea to the voters that you are just some goofy stupid politician (instead of venal and corrupt), that also is smart…

    Who is stupid? GOP voters who believe paleocon pundits who push the idea that traitorous GOP politicians are stupid instead of venal and corrupt.

    GOP voters, if you believe GOP congressmen are stupid instead of venal/corrupt, then YOU are the stupid ones.

    And as for conservative pundits who continue to push this idea, well, I will refrain from commenting on just what they are…

  16. Identity politics would be less onerous without the asymmetry.

    As soon as vibrantly diverse minorities give up their monolithic stance and become, well, diverse enough to allow respect for the attitudes that built this civilization – white – then we (whites) might think there is hope for them to rejoin the narrow pathway of evolution.

    Until then, any and all disrespect for white culture is an attack on whites, culture, civilization. Not too surprised at all this anti-white noise; it is nothing more than primitive DNA doing what primitive DNA does best, namely looking for low hanging fruit to grab. In our current situation, the low hanging fruit is white civilization.

  17. My own ideal: a racial and ethnic super-majority, tolerant and hospitable to small minorities of others: what I call “salt-in-the-stew diversity.” A little salt in the stew improves it; too much spoils it. Numbers, numbers, numbers.

    Agreed. Completely.

    Salt in the stew is a good analogy. I’ve called it spices in soup, chocolate swirled into vanilla ice cream, and raisins in raisin bread.

    Numbers: As myself and others have repeatedly pointed out, just simply the total number of people in a country is a very, very important variable that should be respected. So far, we and our leadership have just willy-nilly allowed that number to grow without any discussion about what might be a good, steady-state quantity.

    In the USA, that number was 200 million when I first learned it in middle school. Now it is over 330 million, and virtually all the added people are “salt,” or “spices,” that threaten to make our soup barely palatable. 200 Million was a very good number, especially when it was mostly soup.

    As for white Americans having had enough anti-white stuff, realizing it and acting/voting: They need to hear some kind of alternative megaphone. They will not wake up if all they get is corporate-owned media.

    How can we build our own megaphone* so those Americans can hear us?

    *”The Megaphone” is the term used by Steve Sailer to describe MainStream Media and all the loud voices in places like government and academia too, as I understand it.

    Ron Unz has written a good plan for attacking the MainStream Media, so that could be a starting point, but we need to replace the MSM or at least compete with it. Maybe he has a plan for that and I missed it. Readership of this site is increasing, and more well-known people seem to be reading it too, so that is a start.

  18. SMK says: • Website
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Yes, the “salt in the stew” analogy is ridiculous, not only is respect to “the numbers,” the tens of millions of nonwhites who will soon transform the U.S. into a nonwhite-majority hell-hole and dystopia in which European-Americans as a group will be an increasingly dispossessed and persecuted minority, but also in the use of salt as a metaphor for racial diversity. From colonial times, in the South, the “stew” was “spoiled” not by a bit too much salt but by far too much black pepper. Too much “salt in the stew.” Detroit is 85% black, Baltimore 70%, St. Louis 65% black, and on and on. To say nothing of tens of millions of Mestizos and pure “indios” from Mexico and Central America, including MS-13. A bit too much chili powder in the stew.

  19. Anonymous[283] • Disclaimer says:

    The Sailer Strategy is just the old Southern Strategy applied nationwide.

    It will be ironic if the end result of 150+ years of radical racial egalitarianism will be to turn New England into Alabama.

  20. pyrrhus says:
    @animalogic

    As one who grew up in the 50s and 60s, I think the current population is already excessive, and has destroyed much of what was best in America. LA before the hispanic influx was heaven on Earth, for example, while now….

  21. @silviosilver

    But real racism, in your face racism, not the fanciful nonsense that ‘studies’ departments concoct. Whites are big racial pussies today, but wasn’t it all that long ago that they were not shy at all about letting other races know how little they thought of them. That leaves a bad taste in the mouth and it’s something no one wants to be – and no one should be – subjected to. And most whites, I think, are sincerely sorry for it.

    It is so weird that once they got rid of the racism the whole system collapsed. It is almost like racism is required for everything to function.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
  22. The next wave of white flight will carry whites past the burbs and out of the metro entirely. Let the anti-whites have the city. There is a vast red sea surrounding the blue archipelago that still values self respect. I myself recently fled a large southern city for the wilds of East Texas. I swear. It still feels like America out here.

    By the way. The GOP has no hold on the deplorables. The beauty of Trump’s electoral victory is that he defeated both parties.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  23. @Samuel Skinner

    It is so weird that once they got rid of the racism the whole system collapsed. It is almost like racism is required for everything to function.

    This is the kind of observation that is so beloved of WN’s. It has the virtue of being largely true, while at the same time bearing near-zero real-world practicality. So I think the really weird thing is how WN’s can be so ‘right’, and yet so politically useless.

    • Replies: @Chase
  24. “A revival of the WASP ascendancy is likewise out of the question.” Derbyshire, you are a perfect example of WASP degeneracy. You married a Chinese woman and have Chinese offspring.

    “My own ideal: a racial and ethnic super-majority, tolerant and hospitable to small minorities of others: what I call “salt-in-the-stew diversity.” A little salt in the stew improves it; too much spoils it. Numbers, numbers, numbers.” Your Chinese wife and two offspring are anti-Western, anti-white. You have imported and procreated three fifth columns in the West. Hopefully, they will not reproduce. As to your a “little salt in the stew…”, you have introduced Chinese poisons into the West. Your wife and offspring are spoilers. The only “minorities” who deserve tolerance are the American Indians/Eskimos, Caucasian Christians from the Middle East and Caucasians from Latin America. The West is not black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim. These types cannot have any quarter in the West.

    • Replies: @SMK
    , @Hapalong Cassidy
  25. HoneyBear says:
    @byrresheim

    “They’re sitting out there, waiting to give you their money! Are you gonna take it? Are you man enough to take it?”

    -the former Alec Baldwin; Glengarry Glenross

  26. Laugh. good grief a better question to answer is why republicans have lost so many white votes in the first place.

    I think it’s a better strategy to play a game of sound policy that benefits citizens, but if whiteness is the game to be played and you intend to dump any further complaint about identity politics it might be a good idea to examine why whites are shifting away from the party — so much so that republicans are would rather dump any pretense of being pro-US in order to support DACA and any number of schemes to import anyone to avoid losing whites –

    SO i would be curious how many iranians, syrians, brits, french, czechs, russians, ukrainians, poles, would come to the country and shore up republican losses of whites.

    I suspect less than 5% would cling to anything resembling traditional republican thinking —

    In which case, why risk it and they will in overwhelming numbers vote with democrats as the path of least resistance to anything and everything. But I have no doubt you have whites supporting more whites – even if they aren’t supporting the party you’d like them to.

  27. Here’s the deal, I am not anti-white,. But if you say whites are better, and better at delivering better for the country — then you had better be able to back it up. if you don’t the white better motif will simply lose credibility.

    It’s the same with any identity group, women will be better when in power — when upon examination women empower, in this case mostly white women perform no better in overall delivery than white men. I am not going to subscribe to a white only policy unless it delivers and by delivery I mean for US citizens, not merely whites.

    After all we have seen where 200 years of white best policy have brought us.

  28. RVBlake says:

    So Trump will go into the midterms with an “aggressive strategy” on legal and illegal immigration. Oh goodie, more campaign promises.

  29. SMK says: • Website
    @White Guy In Japan

    When did CH/Roissy and a few other misogynists from the soi-disant “manosphere” -who detest half of the white race with a few rare exceptions- become white advocates as opposed to advocates for men and boys of all races who are the victims of “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination? A slight majority of whites are female.

  30. SMK says: • Website
    @attilathehen

    Another deranged psychotic rant. The “Derb” and his Chinese wife and half-Chinese son and daughter are a consummate example of how a “little salt in the stew”(or should we say tumeric) improves rather than spoils the flavor as opposed to large doses of black pepper and chili powder.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  31. @silviosilver

    Yeah, Mr. Sailer may have meant it to apply to the 2-party system we have now, but I agree with you, Silvio. As for Mr. Perot, I really miss that guy. It was only a year or two ago that I thought of him again, and he seemed to me like the proto-Trump. I believe Mr. Perot is a smarter man though, and would have done a hell of a lot better job as President. I wonder what the Deep State really did to him in the summer of 1992.

    • Replies: @KenH
  32. KenH says:
    @silviosilver

    Secondly, and contra WN’s inflated charges, not all non-whites actually hate whites.

    Pretty much every WN knows that and your claim that every white nationalist believes that 100% of non-whites hate us in all in your imagination. There’s a greater diversity of thought and opinion among white nationalists than either conservatives, leftists or even anti-anti semitic race realists like Derb and the Amren crowd and one WN doesn’t speak for all of us.

    Non-whites in general are much more tribalistic than whites which does pose a clear and present danger to us if not checked by what the late Samuel Francis called a “countervailing racial power”. And by that he meant whites acting as a conscious and cohesive racial group against blacks and other non-white racial groups.

    Supermajorities of Black, Latino, Asian support and vote for the stridently anti-white Democrats and never seem to protest the left’s unofficial policy of racial hatred of whites. So it’s not a stretch for WN’s to conclude that majorities of each non-white race harbor feelings towards whites ranging from mild antagonism to hate.

    • Agree: Stonehands
  33. KenH says:

    No doubt an increasing number of whites are sick and tired of hearing about illusory “white privilege” and other racial slights by the Democrats and their media and seeing the demographics of their cities and neighborhoods changing almost by the month, but don’t expect the Republican party to sincerely and shrewdly exploit this racial anger for political gain. For they won’t even acknowledge that whites exist and have genuine interests. Their Jewish donors and handlers won’t let them and if they slip they’ll get the rug pulled out from underneath them.

    Besides, Republicans eschew identity politics when it comes to their white base of support although they hypocritically embrace it and make overt racial appeals to blacks and Latinos during election season. So we’ll get the usual “race doesn’t matter” spiel and a race neutral message and the usual humdrum talking points that demoralize the base and causes them to stay home.

    • Replies: @Backwoods Bob
  34. KenH says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Perot would have had a much better Congress to work with in 1992 and the Democrats were actually quite strong on the immigration issue since at that time they were loyal to the white working class but not anymore. The nation was also much less polarized so I think he could have accomplished a great deal.

  35. @SMK

    SMK, I think I’ve seen your initials every so often. Are you hiding something in your life? Deranged? No, I deal in facts. Fact: Derb’s Chinese woman and daughter were Obummer voters. Fact: Derb had to have the US military straighten out his son. His Chinese tiger mommy (and he) did a poor job in raising the boy. He wrote in an article his daughter’s IQ is “around” 110. “Around” really means 105-109. His offspring are barely average.

    Derb used the word salt because that’s used a great deal in European cooking. You mention a “little tumeric” as not being too bad. Tumeric is commonly used throughout Asia. Asians, i.e., East Indians, Chinese, Korean, Filipinos, etc. are botulism in the Western, Caucasian, European stew. His Chinese woman and offspring are a large overdose of la jiao jiang in the Western stew.

    His scribblings are more and more hysterical. My gut feeling is that his Chinese offspring are involved with some black/Asian/Jewish types. He will never secure a place for them because they do not and will never belong to the West.

    Derbyshire will have to let us know how his family votes in the fall.

    Ramzpaul just uploaded a video about moving to a European country. Derb and his offspring have a distinct advantage – their Chinese mother. They can easily move to the East.

  36. bartok says:
    @SMK

    When did CH/Roissy … become white advocates as opposed to advocates for men and boys of all races … ?

    Roosh V last year gave a direct answer to your somewhat rhetorical question:

    What I thought was a war against men is really a battle within a bigger war against white people. … What a let down to realize that there isn’t a crusade against men as much as white people.

    http://www.rooshv.com/kill-whitey

  37. Svigor says:

    I’m gonna keep pushing for White Zionism. Like the “gauche” Jews, who I can’t recall Derbyshire ever labeling as such.

  38. Svigor says:
    @Randal

    But, as the comment attributed above to Chateau Heartiste points out, decrying and abstaining from identity politics for your own group whilst other identity groups merrily engage in it means only one result – endless defeats for your disarmed identity group to the benefit of those other groups ruthlessly engaging in identity politics. And that indeed has been the history of the past few decades in the countries of the US sphere.

    The irony is that the more viable White counter-identity-politics becomes, the less aggressive other groups will be, as they opt for deescalation in the face of a superior adversary.

    In other words, someone’s always gonna have the whip hand; better us than the alternative.

    • Replies: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  39. @Achmed E. Newman

    Nope, having GOP majorities means absolutely nothing. It’s been 1 1/2 years running, and they haven’t got anything done for Americans.

    Achmed, nothing could be further from the truth. We don’t get everything we want from the GOP, but the Democrats have abandoned reason, experience and common sense in order to enshrine an anti-white aristocracy.

    Consider the opportunity costs, my friend. The perfect is the enemy of the good, and the GOP globalists will be driven out. Politics is not clean, level, plumb and square – nor linear.

    GOP majorities means that the Gulag in America is in the hundreds or thousands, and not the millions and tens of millions. Count your blessings.

  40. Corvinus says:
    @SMK

    “When did CH/Roissy and a few other misogynists from the soi-disant “manosphere” -who detest half of the white race with a few rare exceptions- become white advocates as opposed to advocates for men and boys of all races who are the victims of “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination?”

    Easy. When he turned 40 and realized he is still single and without offspring. Furthermore, his schtick was getting old, and he needed to reinvent himself. So…POOF, a white nationalist is born.

  41. Dr. Doom says:

    The enemy parasite fears blowback. They use smartphones and video to dull the brains. They drop drugs into the population to weaken will.
    Ultimately they will fail. Simply numbers. They have NO MORE ALLIES. NO ONE WANTS THEM AS FRIENDS. Idi Amin. Mohammed. Even White Christians.

    Paycheck soldiers. Cheap thugs. No LOYALTY.

    POWER IS ABOUT CONTROL. The Enemy Alien has NONE. No self-control. You can see it in the decadence and filth. POWER IS CONTROL.

    No amount of drugs. No amount of fake monopoly money. No amount of sneaky “mind control”.
    NOTHING CAN MAKE UP FOR THE LACK OF SELF CONTROL.

    The “mind” of the enemy is a delusional paranoid bunch of neuroses. Incapable of making sense of reality. Delusions of Grandeur.

    I KNOW THEY’RE SCARED. If this was going well they would be as quiet as a mouse.
    WHEN THEY SCREAM AND CENSOR, THEY’RE SCARED.

    Even now they censor their channels.
    Making echo chambers of THE ONLY RELIEF VALVE.
    The Pressure BUILDS. Its a GIANT POWDERKEG.

    ONE SPARK. ITS ALL OVER…

  42. One thing I never understood. If Derb and his acolytes believe in this dank “race realism” stuff about how Whites are a supposedly superior race, then why fight mass migration? If your theories are correct, then Whites will easily sit atop the racial hierarchy in an open borders America. Everybody will gain, but Whites (being at the top) will gain the most, and will disproportionately occupy managerial and entrepreneurial roles in the new order.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @MarkinLA
    , @Anon
  43. lavoisier says: • Website

    One thing I never understood. If Derb and his acolytes believe in this dank “race realism” stuff about how Whites are a supposedly superior race, then why fight mass migration? If your theories are correct, then Whites will easily sit atop the racial hierarchy in an open borders America. Everybody will gain, but Whites (being at the top) will gain the most, and will disproportionately occupy managerial and entrepreneurial roles in the new order.

    I thought you libertarians had finally learned that open borders cannot work with a welfare state?

    Last I checked we still have a welfare state?

    • Replies: @Svigor
  44. Svigor says:
    @The American Libertarian

    Because miscegenation, stupid. Because you can’t have ethnic or racial conflict within a homogeneous nation-state, stupid. Because national harmony, stupid. Because that’s what countries are for, stupid.

    Why are libertardians so stupid?

    P.S., what benefits accrue to those who “sit atop” Blacks?

    That’s a rhetorical question.

  45. Svigor says:
    @lavoisier

    I think it’s in the Bible; “thou shalt not suffer a libertarian to live.”

  46. MarkinLA says:
    @The American Libertarian

    I was just starting to think libertarians weren’t dumber than shit and this was posted:

    If your theories are correct, then Whites will easily sit atop the racial hierarchy in an open borders America.

    Voting. Ever hear about it? Imagine how much of the pie those at the bottom of this hierarchy can vote for themselves without doing anything to earn it.

  47. @KenH

    That’s an interesting point.

    A couple of things. First, the largest “party” is Independent. No party affiliation.

    The more immediate concern for a lot of us is the intelligence and “police” agencies, spanning multiple countries, that have gone berzerk: simultaneously blowing every incident of school shootings and at the same time obstructing prosecution of the largest criminal conspiracy in American history.

    I would hate to call it Trump genius to have timed the implosion of the Mueller investigation and the explosion of the FBI/CIA revelations so as to maximize republican votes in the election. But that’s what is happening.

    The octopus of various Clinton Foundation profiteers, the Awan spy ring in Congress, the drug and weapons ratlines making Iran/Contra look like a lemonaide stand…

    There is an awful lot coming to head here besides very justified anger over anti-white racism. The War on Men too. The establishment media is doing everything it can to evade and divert attention from the growing criminal conspiracy cases but it is becoming an unstoppable juggernaut.

    It’s going to be a conglomorate of issues and the corruption/sedition revelations are hurting the democrats more, unless they clean their own house.

    But instead they just keep beating the same drum. A year before the election I wondered aloud nearly every day if they were so stupid they were going to run right up to election day with “racist, sexist, misogynist” etc.

    They look to be doing the same thing right up to this election. So the Democrats are going to do their work for them. Talk about the stupid party – embracing MS-13, that’s comedy gold.

    I agree the republicans will act as you say, and also agree that all else the same it demoralizes the base. But I think there will be a growing anger right up to election over the corruption and sedition, the incompetence of the government in protecting children, and etc.

    I expect a rout.

    • Replies: @Stonehands
  48. KenH says:

    Nancy Peloser is admitting by her pithy tweet that current immigration policy and levels are making whites a demographic minority. This is with malice aforethought. Whereas support for third world immigration was once based on bleeding hearts it’s now a matter of realpolitik on the left and is the means by which this nation will be delivered to the (((totalitarian, anti-white left))).

    Trump unwittingly pursued the Sailer Strategy during the presidential campaign with his appeals to issues of concern to the white middle and working class like immigration and free trade. Of course, promises are made to be broken or only partially fulfilled and Trump has opted to be Israel’s errand boy 24/7 and most of the deplorables don’t seem to mind.

    A nation of endlessly-squabbling identity groups would, it seems to me, be a dismal thing.

    Ok, then acknowledge and confront Jewish power and influence that has transformed America from a 90% white nation to a multiracial tinderbox always ready to explode with a wrong court decision, a politically incorrect comment or if a white officer enforces the law on a diversity. We didn’t get this way in a vacuum.

    You fight fire with fire and whites have no choice at this point but to start practicing identity politics and becoming as confrontational with non-whites in the political arena as they are with us. Our objectives should be to damage their racial interests and weaken them as groups. Again, just like they are doing to us.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  49. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    Dude, would you seriously choose a white woman over a yellow woman if you had the choice?? Most white guys desire Asian women over white women but because of familial and societal pressures and cultural barriers they stick with their own and live a life of quite desperation.

    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @attilathehen
  50. @Anonymous

    Dude, first I’m a girl – attilatheHEN. Second, I’ve never been interested in vacationing on the Island of Sappho. Third, most Caucasian males choose Caucasian females because yellow girls are fugly and dragon women. If a Caucasian male wants to marry an Asian female, he must export himself from the West to the East. I don’t want Asian poontang imported to the West.

    • Replies: @manorchurch
    , @Biff
  51. @SMK

    And a small minority of white females are attilathehen. She really does hate John Derbyshire, doesn’t she?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  52. Corvinus says:
    @KenH

    “Ok, then acknowledge and confront Jewish power and influence that has transformed America from a 90% white nation to a multiracial tinderbox always ready to explode with a wrong court decision, a politically incorrect comment or if a white officer enforces the law on a diversity. We didn’t get this way in a vacuum.”

    Most normies/the mushy middle simply do not view it in the manner you do. They may hold the typical Jew stereotypes or make references to this group dominating certain sectors of our economy, but generally speaking they are not of the mindset that Jews have duped them by way of Cultural Marxism, nor are they of the perspective that white people MUST unite or else face extermination, at worst, or subjugation, at best.

    “You fight fire with fire and whites have no choice at this point but to start practicing identity politics and becoming as confrontational with non-whites in the political arena as they are with us.”

    If there are some white people who want to go down this route, then that is their liberty. If other white people prefer to exercise their liberty and make their own decisions about race, then that is their liberty. You are no different than the SJW when you virtue signal how white people MUST conform to certain norms.

    • Replies: @epochehusserl
  53. @attilathehen

    John Derbyshire’s family is a very interesting case study. He has this album of family photos on the internet that is quite revealing. The son looks very ‘happa’, and with a pseudo WN father and a mother that obviously preferred white guys he must have grown up with an insane inferiority complex. Clearly joining the military was his way of proving his worth and masculinity to his demanding, unforgiving father. That poor kid will spend his life trying to live up to his father’s expectations in vain. Based on the photos in the same album, his daughter seems like she’s actively rebelled against him. I spotted quite a few tats and piercings. For someone that spends quite a bit of time writing about the future of the white race and the importance of traditional families, his personal choices are very curious.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  54. @attilathehen

    Dude, first I’m a girl – attilatheHEN.

    No, you’re an old woman.

    I like Asian females, by which I mean Chinese and Southeast Asian females — Indians referenced as “Asian” is a trick of the media. Indian chicks are skanky.

    “Oriental” remains the better term.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  55. @Roderick Spode

    Another cuck who can’t deal with facts. You must also have some yellow skeletons in your closet. Hate Derbyshire? No. I just expose the cuck for what he is. He wrote an article stating Asians are smarter than whites. His book about being doomed is just an autobiography of what is happening in his life. It’s weird to know the truth about Derbyshire and yet he scribbles about the West. I know he’s old and has some diseases so I’m sure this is taking a toll on him. On the other hand, as he approaches the end, I think he regrets what he did. The only way for him to make up for his degeneracy is to move to China. That would help us and his family.

    • Replies: @Roderick Spode
  56. @TheMediumIsTheMassage

    I wouldn’t use the word interesting. I would use the word degeneracy. His mother latched onto Derbyshire for a passport out of China. In one sense, I don’t blame her given the state of China. But, she is ungrateful for having been plucked out of a rice paddy. At least I would have imagined her being grateful and telling Derbyshire that the West is better than China. She obviously did not do this. Derbyshire has written Asians are smarter than whites. They are not. The son had to join the military to be straightened out. WOW!!! The wife and daughter are Obummer voters, so they like blacks. Derbyshire’s expectations are that his offspring be Chinese. This is so bizarre on so many levels because they aren’t in China. Also, they are barely average in intelligence so they won’t contribute anything to the West. I know he’s buds with Peter Brimelow. They are both English ex-pats, around the same age and remember an England that has almost disappeared. At least Brimelow married Caucasian women. Derbyshire’s family is not traditional. It’s so weird about how he writes about the white race, yet he has China in his house. These scribblings are some strange confession I think because deep down he knows what he did is wrong. Also, as I have written before, I have a gut feeling his Chinese offspring are involved with some black/Asian/Jewish types. This will only alienate more from the West. He wants us to help his offspring once he’s gone. That is not going to happen.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @WorkingClass
  57. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    Most halfies are good looking. Asian-white is a nice mix and comes out pretty good most of the time. The females will come out like Tia Cararre and the males like Dean Cain.

    I think there’s an evolutionary reason Caucasian males are attracted to and want to procreate with East Asian (NE & SE) females. The canard that it is because of some outdated cultural stereotyping reasons is used because the evolutionary biology reason makes many uncomfortable. Kind of like the race & IQ issue in evolutionary biology. And fortunately for Caucasian males, this evolutionary inclination is mutual. Almost like nature is a eugenicist creating a better hybrid species between the two superior races.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  58. @Anonymous

    Sure. Chrissy Teigen made a good choice in marrying the black John Legend. Obummer’s Indonesian half-sister Maya married a Chinese guy. Many happas marry Jews. The East awaits you.

  59. @attilathehen

    Also, they are barely average in intelligence so they won’t contribute anything to the West.

    Usually I can ignore IQtards. But sometimes you just piss me off. Is it your contention that the Irish and the Coolies who built the first trans-continental rail road contributed nothing? Or were they a bunch of fucking geniuses?

    Foresters, fishermen, farmers, ranchers, miners? Factory workers, foundry workers, millers, bakers? Truck drivers, construction workers, peace officers, soldiers? Just a bunch of useless average mother fuckers?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
    , @Truth
  60. @WorkingClass

    First, let’s define what the West is not. The West is not black/Asian/Muslim/Jewish. The coolies contributed little to the trans-continental railroad line. Once they finished their contributions, they were deported to China. Interesting how these coolies were never able to help China industrialize. One would think that they could have done this but they did not. It’s because coolies are Asian. The Japanese are the only intelligent Asians. Yet, they don’t compare to Caucasians. At least when the Japanese copy the West, they create excellent companies in their own country. China is just now industrialized, but it is also collapsing.

    Recall 19th century Americans would learn the technology of England and reproduce it here in the USA. This caused the USA to quickly industrialize and pull ahead of Europe. China did not do anything like this in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

    The Irish are Western and are a productive people. Many Irish who came to the USA started in factories and within a couple of generations assimilated and contributed to the USA.

    As to the trades you mentioned, my father was a steel worker and my mother would work as a cleaning lady when the family needed extra money. This provided my siblings and me with a stable family life so we could get good educations and better jobs. I have a sister who is an electrical engineer, a brother who is a computer engineer and some siblings work in well-paid, white-collar jobs. I am planning to go to law school. No one knows more than I do about the “average mother fucking working class.” This is why I voted for Trump. Since he started in real estate, he has worked side-by-side with his blue-collar workers. He has created jobs with good pay and benefits for the working class.

    I sense some jealousy in you. Are you envious of someone who has more than you? If you are Irish, what do you care about the coolies? Unless, of course, this is a reflection on something in your life. I have stated consistently I am only for the West. I am only for the betterment of Westerners. Asians/blacks/Jews/Muslims are no concern of mine.

    • Replies: @WorkingClass
    , @Truth
  61. @attilathehen

    Attila (on the off-chance that you are not a troll), if you really want to help the white race, go do something nice for your husband or children instead of spending hours posting the same objections on every piece Derbyshire posts here.

    • Replies: @Mishra
    , @Anon
  62. Truth says:
    @WorkingClass

    Are you saying the Irish are low IQ?

  63. @attilathehen

    We have a lot in common. I was born into the American working class in 1944. My people are Dutch and Irish on my mothers side and Norwegian on my fathers side. I’m a vet and a jack of all trades. And a card carrying deplorable.

    The reason I spoke of being pissed is that you indicated that people of average intelligence had nothing to offer. I have been working alongside men of average intelligence all my life. Building things that people need. Growing things that people eat. I care about the coolies because they too are working class. Workers everywhere who sell their labor to the Capitalists have much in common. If you are only for the betterment of Westerners that’s fine. At least you are not thinking only of yourself.

    I wish you well in your chosen profession. I expect that you will be exposed to the roots and history of American Labor Law and related history of organized labor if you have not already done that.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  64. I can hear my Irish grandfather chuckling at that. No. I am trying to say that people of average intelligence are quite capable of contributing something of value to society.

  65. @WorkingClass

    I stated it was Derbyshire’s barely average Chinese offspring who have nothing to offer. As I always state, I am only for the West. The West is not black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim. A country needs people with an IQ of 90+ to be successful. These people are Caucasians/Europeans. The West is what created the modern, industrial world of today. The West came up with the greatest music, literature and philosophies. You’ve got to give up the coolies. They are not Western. Unless, of course, as I also stated, there is something in your closet.

    We need all kinds of jobs in the West for the different types of people we have and their different talents. We need to repatriate and segregate people who are destroying the West. This process has started in Eastern Europe. We need to work harder in the West to get these things done.

    • Replies: @Stonehands
  66. KenH says:

    nor are they of the perspective that white people MUST unite or else face extermination, at worst, or subjugation, at best.

    Those whites that you’ve appointed yourself spokesman for who feel racial unity is optional do so at their peril. The non-whites that you and they foolishly think are your friends will turn on you when the time comes. You and these other whites aren’t seen as “good whites” by your constant virtue signaling, rejection of pro-white beliefs and general race neutrality. You’re just useful idiots whose time will come to an end.

    Blacks and other non-whites have literally thousands of whites as well as many white politicians who advocate for their interests. The number of non-whites who advocate for whites and white racial interests is probably a baker’s dozen at most and zero non-white politicians because they only know how to act in their own interests and aren’t the least bit sentimental towards us as we are towards them. Think about that before one of your shoot from the hip responses.

  67. KenH says:

    You are no different than the SJW when you virtue signal how white people MUST conform to certain norms.

    No Corvy, because I’m not shouting down, harassing and threatening whites who merely disagree with me like SJW’s are doing to rightists. But whites place much less emphasis on race than other racial groups (mostly due to mental conditioning) and this will have consequences for all of us if they don’t straighten out their thinking and if we don’t vote as a block and act as a single organism like the other groups.

  68. Truth says:
    @attilathehen

    First, let’s define what the West is not. The West is not black/Asian/Muslim/Jewish.

    Actually Tillie, the west most certainly is black; your average black American can trace his US heritage much further back than your average white American. This is a fact not my opinion. And the west is most certainly Jewish, for better or worse.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  69. @Corvinus

    If most whites didnt feel this way then trump wouldnt have been elected.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  70. @MarkinLA

    Yeah I agree, lower class voters suck. Thing is, lower class WHITE voters also suck. They are the root of protectionism and statism in this country.

    Bottom line: if our system is beholden to populists, then libertarianism fails regardless of whether the electorate is white or beige or brown or purple. If our system is a system of elites, then our system succeeds, again regardless of the electorate.

    • Replies: @Mark Presco
    , @Anon
    , @MarkinLA
  71. Corvinus says:
    @epochehusserl

    Trump was elected president because Shitlery was an absolutely flawed candidate who neglected to reach out to the white working class primarily on the key issue of immigration restrictions (which I support) despite receiving advice to do so from her husband and other advisors. He did not make it part of his campaign about “Cultural Marxism” and the ruinous machinations of Jews. And white working class males were decidedly turned off by the prospect of having a “mother hen” in the White House, which is other than surprising.

    • Replies: @Thomm
    , @Anon
  72. Curle says:
    @Anonymous

    Correct. America was founded on Republican values.

    All men are created equal only to the extent that none was granted kingship by divine right, nothing more nothing less.

  73. Thomm says:

    It is amazing that someone can work at National Review for over a decade, and still not figure out that conservatism is about pretending to resist the left with the full intention of caving into them eventually and then helping the speed of leftist advance appear slower than it is.

    Effectively, cuckservatives are allies of the left.

    Derbyshire never figured this out even though he worked at cuckservative central.

    • Replies: @Truth
  74. Thomm says:
    @Corvinus

    Trump was elected president because Shitlery was an absolutely flawed candidate who neglected to reach out to the white working class primarily on the key issue of immigration restrictions (which I support) despite receiving advice to do so from her husband and other advisors.

    That is right. Trump was never a White Trashionalist candidate, as he never wanted to restrict legal immigration wholesale.

    Given the immense success of his tax reform and regulatory pruning, he has already succeeded in the eyes of most of his voters and most swing voters. White Trashionalists are economic leftists so they don’t value these things. Remember, the preferred candidate for White Trashionalists was Bernie Sanders.

    Plus, every 8 years the party shifts anyway, which has been true since 1952. 1980 was the only exception, when Reagan seized what was scheduled to be Carter’s second term (quite literally a once-in-a-lifetime aberration). It is amazing how many people are surprised that the highly predictable 8-year party shift happened at all. Anyone who was surprised by Bush in 2000, Obama in 2008, and a Republican in 2016 is a total fool. The only real surprise is that Trump won the GOP primaries (rightfully so).

  75. Biff says:
    @attilathehen

    Dude, first I’m a girl – attilatheHEN.

    Well la ti fucking da. Hey, my wife is a girl, and Chinese, and her daddy is super rich like the Pope. Guess how much my wife will receive when he dies? Nothing! Because she’s a girl! Only men receive inheritance in this part of the world, and you want to know why? Because the entire planet has yet to be infected with your Western liberalism! Keep it there. Don’t spread it. Literally!

  76. @Backwoods Bob

    I agree with both of you guys, but do you really think this guy Sessions is actually going to prosecute anyone? This is the DONOR class we are talking about here, or more specifically the thugs who protect the cadaverous central government.

    You are not going to clear away the flies and the vultures who are feasting on its putrid flesh – or vanquish the phalanx of deep state forces or shame the gullibility and gutlessness of either party- by continuing this charade at the ballot box.
    The founders put in place the ultimate form of redress of grievances:

    …several hot lead servings of…

    Go F*** yourself.

  77. @attilathehen

    White women have forged their own radioactive culture. You’ve got to admit that you are the exception- but you do not disprove the Rule.

    • Replies: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  78. Mishra says:
    @Roderick Spode

    Attila (on the off-chance that you are not a troll)

    • Replies: @Truth
  79. Miro23 says:
    @WorkingClass

    The next wave of white flight will carry whites past the burbs and out of the metro entirely. Let the anti-whites have the city. There is a vast red sea surrounding the blue archipelago that still values self respect. I myself recently fled a large southern city for the wilds of East Texas. I swear. It still feels like America out here.

    That’s the way it goes, with people emigrating/immigrating to more congenial places – after all, that’s how America was founded.

    The present United States is not a congenial place for Whites, and is the result of the rapid rise to power of US Jewry and their anti-White activism . They form the narrative – it isn’t formed by Hispanics, Blacks or Asians – and it’s simply to do with the consolidation of their power ( a very delicate issue since they are only 2% of the US population and don’t represent anyone apart from themselves).

    Organized Jewry wants control over the whole of the US through Washington, so a logical response would be to break away from that control (i.e. break away from Washington). Using state initiatives, the US can convert into a looser confederation with red states and counties unilaterally taking back control over their own affairs (for example, tax, spending and debt issuance).

    This can be done in a friendly way, and the blue cities would of course be free to organize their own affairs how they pleased – but without an automatic right to emigrate to red states. Immigration decisions, along with economic and social policy would be decided at state level by the state’s own citizens.

    The first step would be designing a template for citizen participation at the county/state level, funding it, providing an administration, local “red” media, and in stages legitimately reclaiming power from Washington, and if Washington sends in the National Guard or Homeland Security (against these “racists” and “domestic terrorists”) then let them try it and the issue would get resolved the other way.

    • Replies: @manorchurch
    , @Joe862
  80. Centrist says:

    I’m a non-white individual (American of middle eastern extraction) who can accurately be described as anti-anti-white. I rolled my eyes at the words/phrases “whiteness”, “white privilege”, “cis white male”, etc. long before Trump and his ilk reared their heads. I may have become inclined to vote according to these inclinations if Trumpism hadn’t vastly overplayed its hand in recent years. My distaste for SJW types is only exceeded by my contempt for the bumpkins that make up the Trump base.

    Trump has ironically reified many of the formerly nonsensical accusations thrown at whites (racism, misogny, ignorance, etc). These were things that may have been true/believable in the distant past but had since become unbelievable to a silent majority of Americans, both white and non-white, by the time of Obama’s presidency.

    Derbyshire is failing to see the intractability of a certain measure of upper crust (aka liberal) white hatred for Trump. His greatest detractors will always be white, and for much the same reason that I, as a middle-eastern American, hated Bin Laden more feverishly than perhaps any white American. It was because Bin Laden represented a two pronged assault on my country and my identity as a middle eastern American. White liberal elites will always hate Trump with unmatched fervor because he both assaults their values and (in their eyes) debases their skin. I have a close German-Argentinean friend who, in a sense, has seceded from his skin and, hilariously, has “identified” as Hispanic since the last election cycle.

    • Replies: @Anon
  81. Rot has gone too far, no? Whatever perch whites eventually settle on, “Muricans won’t be on it.

  82. Truth says:
    @Thomm

    LOL. Once again, Buddy you nailed it.

    • Replies: @Thomm
  83. Truth says:
    @Mishra

    (SMH)

    Kats are incredibly butthurt around here about Tillie saying they should pork a chick who looks like them.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  84. I’ve said it so many times that it is, basically, dull. I have a problem that people as yet squabble about basics.

    One can’t have a functioning modern country that is basically multicultural & multiethnic, and without the culturally dominant core population of at least 70%. If you import, say, 50 million Japanese in Russia, you’ll get civil war; the same if you flood Israel with 3 million Arabs, or Poland with 20 million Germans. Simply, people want to live in their national communities & when the dominant group, in the case of US Euro-whites, comes from 88% to barely 60% of population in just a half of century, you get a recipe for disaster.

    JD is right when he excoriates modern identity politics re race, gender, sex orientation,… in, presumably, technologically advanced Western countries (US, Canada, UK, ,,).

    But these societies will collapse anyway if/when they lose dominant ethnic core. No amount of right or wrong policy can save them. That’s why democratic, although slightly authoritarian policy of Singapore is right: they have ca. 70% Chinese, the rest being various Indian peoples and Malays. Due to lower birthrate, dominant Chinese would, if not checked, become a minority in some future. So Singapore tacitly approves more Chinese immigration & any kind of policy that keeps the sensitive balance of various ethnicities stable. Without it, this country would have crumbled, either violently or peacefully.

    Modern identity policy is simplistic & ultimately destructive, but it stems from an unstable situation where various demographic groups naturally fend for themselves because they have not much in common with others. What do African-Americans care about American identity embodied in Jefferson and Twain; what do most Asian-Americans care of essentially Christian & European roots of the US (let’s leave WASP question for a moment)? High-functioning minorities like east Asians will remain separate, less than Jews, much less than Slovaks or Greeks, but nevertheless- aliens. Their tribalism is a lower form of nationalism; and national/”racial”/cultural identity won’t go away, whatever one may think of it.

    I don’t see that four big groups in the US (whites, blacks, Hispanics/Mestizos, Asians) have much in common; they do not constitute a nation. Sure, there was American nation until 1960s & it consisted of Euro-Americans, blacks being an American minority group but not a part of American nation (I won’t bother with WASP issue because it is not central anymore due to the real diversity of Euro-Americans).

    In my opinion, it is not realist that most (or enough) US whites will suddenly “awaken” to the ethno-racial-cultural realities. And even if they do, it would just mean postponing the final countdown for 2-3 decades, not more.

    US is not sustainable as a unified & democratic country. You have to have over 70-75% of the core population for that, and this is over. So, the future is:

    a) Brazil- colored chaos with dominant group, whites, dictatorship
    b) Yugoslavia- territorial disintegration
    c) Venezuela (see also a)- total collapse
    d) Soviet Union in the early 1930, i.e. minority (Caucasian- Georgian, Armenian, Jewish, ..) dictatorial rule
    e) Weimar Germany without creativity- chaotic democracy plunging into economic collapse
    f) …

    Even if blacks, Asians, Mestizos, gays, Jews, radical feminists …accept that US is destined to remain an Euro-American country (which is hardly imaginable), why would whites bother to live anymore with so many dependent groups that will, invariably, press for their particular socio-economic positions, this time surreptitiously?

    • Replies: @Miro23
  85. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @The American Libertarian

    You are totally clueless. Libertarianism is a white male thing. It exists only in white cultures, but really only in North America where rugged individualists fled Europe to escape the aristocracy (the elite) and then westward to less controlled territories.

    If people like you have your way, our fate will be South Africa. As whites created an economy and jobs there, blacks flooded in from all over Africa exploding the population from 5 to 50 million. They used democracy to seize control and then vote themselves a license to steal land they never had a claim to. Take a good hard look.

    Should Muslims become the majority, you will find yourself living under Sharia law.

    Giving white women the right to vote moved the country to the left, facilitating the welfare state.

    Your Libertarian values can only exist where the individualistic nature of white men prevail. Cultures reflect the content of the character of the people who create and maintain them.

    https://www.salon.com/2015/06/10/why_libertarianism_is_so_popular_on_the_right_its_the_last_bastion_of_white_male_dominance/

  86. “The Social Justice Warriors of course have a ready answer for that. Unmoored from cosmopolitan universalism, they tell us, white Americans will *revert* to being cross-burning, hood-wearing, neo-Nazi yahoos”

    Go read the contributors and comments at Instapundit, and you will discover a great many people who call themselves conservative arguing something very similar. That is, without laws that force integration and prohibit freedom of association, whites would revert back to denying service to blacks and other minorities, because profit is less important than Hitler, or something.

  87. @Miro23

    Organized Jewry wants control over the whole of the US through Washington, so a logical response would be to break away from that control (i.e. break away from Washington). Using state initiatives, the US can convert into a looser confederation with red states and counties unilaterally taking back control over their own affairs (for example, tax, spending and debt issuance).

    Sounds good, but it is pure fantasy.

    Describe for me just one realistic future scenario wherein a reorganization of states, independent of Washington and federalism, can take place.

    Just one.

    • Agree: Mishra
    • Replies: @Miro23
  88. Chase says:
    @silviosilver

    Just because Communism – as such – was never actually implemented in America, doesn’t mean the Communists of the early 20th Century were unsuccessful. Extremists are important tools in shifting the Overton window in any debate. You write them off and scoff at them at your own risk.

  89. Miro23 says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    US is not sustainable as a unified & democratic country. You have to have over 70-75% of the core population for that, and this is over. So, the future is:

    a) Brazil- colored chaos with dominant group, whites, dictatorship
    b) Yugoslavia- territorial disintegration
    c) Venezuela (see also a)- total collapse
    d) Soviet Union in the early 1930, i.e. minority (Caucasian- Georgian, Armenian, Jewish, ..) dictatorial rule
    e) Weimar Germany without creativity- chaotic democracy plunging into economic collapse
    f) …

    If the US doesn’t become a Neo-Bolshevik PC dictatorship run by its Jewish elite, then it could be a) or b), although Whites are hardly a dictatorship in Brazil – more like surviving as best they can in gated communities with armed guards.

    It’s probably b) because Yugoslavia (like the US) was well defined along racially/geographically lines.

    The resulting map of the Ex United States is – 1) A Blue Archipelago of Jewish/Prog/Black cities 2) A Hispanic/Asian California with a sizeable White minority 3) A large collection of independent Red States (often minus capital cities) with White majorities and probably allied in a Confederation.

    Given the number of guns in the US, the chaos of e) doesn’t bear thinking about.

    BTW Brazilians are highly racially mixed but very sensitive to skin tone. Whiter is better.

  90. anon[204] • Disclaimer says:

    My own ideal: a racial and ethnic super-majority, tolerant and hospitable to small minorities of others: what I call “salt-in-the-stew diversity.” A little salt in the stew improves it; too much spoils it. Numbers, numbers, numbers.

    That is a great analogy. Every society needs a cultural and linguistic super majority to stay cohesive. As an immigrant who came in in the 80′s, I can say that Americans are the most generous, tolerant bunch of people I ever met. But there is a limit to that tolerance(for any society), which has been abused.

    Immigration without assimilation is an invasion. Assimilation is key to nation building. Multiculturalism is a failed concept. There is not a single multicultural country in the world that is peaceful and cohesive. All are boiling cauldrons of inter ethnic strife, even as they appear peaceful to the average visitor, i.e. good places to visit, not good places to live.

    America urgently needs to wise up, put in another 20 year moratorium on immigration, send packing all those who are not yet citizens, and assimilate those who became citizens in the last 30-40 years. The 14th amendment must be repealed. Enough with the anchor babies.

  91. Miro23 says:
    @manorchurch

    Sounds good, but it is pure fantasy.

    Describe for me just one realistic future scenario wherein a reorganization of states, independent of Washington and federalism, can take place.

    Just one.

    For example the state legislature of a Red State such as Utah (strongly opposed to abortion and gay marriage) could declare that it is implementing a more strict interpretation of the 10th Amendment:

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    and start a gradual citizen based consultation and voting process (i.e. a truly Democratic process) of reclaiming state power from Washington.

    What would Washington do?

    • Replies: @Stonehands
    , @manorchurch
  92. No difference between Republicans and Democrats. They serve the same masters, and it ain’t us, whether you’re black or white, you’re the same to them, a debt slave.
    There are a couple of exceptions like Patrick Little and Arthur Jones, but most running are status quo establishment puppets, that only appeal to the minority.
    If they did actually act like “Nazis” they would win in a landslide with the majority.
    Instead they would rather worship Israeli fake Jews, Wall St special interests and lose big.
    Sad!

  93. Thomm says:
    @Truth

    LOL. Once again, Buddy you nailed it.

    Thanks. I managed to zing both Derb and NRO in a few short lines. They deserve it.

    I have simultaneously convinced the White Trashionalists that I am Indian (I am obviously not). They also think Thorfinnsson is Indian. At the same time, the idiots can’t figure out that Corvinus and JohnnyWalker123 actually are Indian.

    Hahaha! my sides, my sides…

  94. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    At least your pychotic rant is about the subject of the article instead of your usual vomiting of every conspiracy theory in your deranged head

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  95. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @The American Libertarian

    Where have you been for the last 50 years?

    Affirmative action became the law of the land 50 years ago. No matter how qualified the White applicant is a qualified non White must be hired, admitted to college, given a contract business loans anything really.

    So the natural talents and skills of Whites have been rigorously suppressed for 50 years and affirmative action will continue until no White American will be able to make a living and have children.
    It’s just a slow form of genocide.

    Your name is libertarian. If you think the capitalists want to hire qualified White Americans instead of incompetent non Whites, think again. Affirmative action and nonWhite immigration care the best things that’s happened to the capitalists since the importation of slaves.

  96. In order to make America great (white) again and to dig yourself out of the hole, one (whitey) has to stop whoring with slanty eyed, porn-grade-sex-slaves and man up to start making white babies with pure white women. You can’t eat your cake and keep it too!

  97. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Centrist

    If his last name is German he can’t get the affirmative goodies until he changes his last name to a Spanish one.

  98. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @The American Libertarian

    Libertarians generally stop being libertarians around age 25 when they get out of college and realize Econ 101 is a business school fantasy.

    You’re on the wrong site, too young, too naive, too pro race to the bottom cannibalizes capitalism, too ignorant of economic reality.

    Libertarians hate White men because the White male unions guaranteed decent wages for a long time. Now that capitalists and liberals destroyed the White male unions wages have stagnated while costs rise and rise and rise.

    Libertarians are as much a tool of capitalism as the feminazis and non White immigrants are.

  99. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Roderick Spode

    Who’d marry tilly?

  100. @Miro23

    and start a gradual citizen based consultation and voting process (i.e. a truly Democratic process) of reclaiming state power from Washington.

    What would Washington do?

    Here! Here!

    What else can be done, the feds are lawless…

    Revelation 22:11 King James Version (KJV)

    11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  101. renfro says:

    Bring Back the WASP

    Half Of America’s States Have Blacklisted Companies That Boycott Israel

    Read more: undefined/fast-forward/401794/half-of-americas-states-have-blacklisted-companies-that-boycott-israel/

    • Replies: @Mishra
  102. Joe862 says:
    @Miro23

    White people need to learn how to manage their money and educate their children. People who are concerned about the future of white people should be figuring out ways to get people to save, invest, earn instead of blowing all of their discretionary income on useless consumer crap and playing. Far too many people are debt/wage slaves and can’t afford to act in their own best interests.

  103. Miro23 says:
    @Joe862

    You’re channeling Calvin Coolidge:

    “There is no dignity
    quite so impressive,
    and no independence
    quite so important,
    as living within your means.”

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  104. MarkinLA says:
    @The American Libertarian

    Mexico is a system of elites. 15% of the population determine how the other 85% live and they have decided that the 85% either live like dogs or move to the US.

    As for voting how do you stop a majority minority block from deciding that what is “yours” is really theirs?

    Protectionism is something that a country does to enhance social harmony. You pay your welfare taxes at the cash register. Think about how much money that saves us.

    • Replies: @bartok
  105. @Svigor

    Yup, exactly. Non whites have already backed down a little bit once Trump won. They come from tribalistic cultures – the strong survive.

    Whites were weak for too long. Now that whites have woken up to a degree, and shown some balls, coloured people see that and respect it.

    In Canada, white people are spineless and thus get no respect (and deserve none) from the non whites pouring in. The excpetion: French Canadians who are still protecting (and actually growing) their language and culture.

  106. Mishra says:
    @renfro

    Even the Daily Mail, which used to offer a slightly different perspective on occasion, has gone full Social-Justice lately.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5797053/Missouri-report-Blacks-85-percent-likely-stopped.html

    Oddly, not a single mention of speeding in the whole piece. What could this mean?

    They even quickly rewrote the ‘Racist Lawyer’ article eliminating all references to the fact that this ‘racist, anti-semitic’ lawyer is himself a chosenite.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5737433/Racist-lawyer-threatens-call-ICE-workers-speaking-Spanish.html

    And so on…

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5736151/Fox-News-staffers-score-10M-payday-16-racial-gender-discrimination-suits-settled.html

  107. @Miro23

    What would Washington do?

    It’s a threat to Federal power, be that power legitimate or not. Prez and Cabinet would hustle to SCOTUS very quickly. The Supremes being a center of Federal power, or the validation thereof, would rule the state as being in violation of Constitution. (Yes, I know, never mind that the state would in actuality be in strict observance of the Constitution.)

    I doubt that anything more drastic than house arrest of state governor and legislators would be necessary to put a stop to it. Two hundred Federal marshals, maybe? Two companies of National Guard troops out of Pennsylvania?

  108. @Joe862

    That’s a very good point Joel. Educating the children and keeping them away from government indoctrination camps, uhhh, schools, as much as possible is the most important thing they can do for the future of society.

    On the money thing, it’s not just that people should get wealthier for a better life’s sake. As I wrote here on More on living paycheck-to-paycheck, being in sound financial shape is a way to avoid being completely held hostage by the SJW’s and the threat to one’s job. Here’s an excerpt:

    Let me now get to the point of why this way of living also results in a big increase in the control-freak, Orwellian police state society. Let me go back to that “living paycheck-to-paycheck” phrase. Here’s what’s the problem with that, aside from the normal worries about the monthly struggle to pay down all the STUFF: One loses much control of his direction in life when he is tied in to the incoming salary on a very short time-line. Let me put this better as an example. I’ve been reading about the fired Google-guy who wrote a simple, in-my-opinion still PC, memo about the whole male/female differences thing. (This post is not about the particulars, and, as to be expected, Steve Sailer is all over it here, here, here, here, and here.). This guy may come out of this with a job soon, just because this situation has gotten lots of attention. That doesn’t happen to the average employee, however, and it can’t. The closer you are bound to your job via your tight month-to-month budget, the less likely you will quit, speak-out, or even push-back a slight bit, when you are harassed with all the mass stupidity. You are not a free agent if you live like this – you are much more beholden to your employer and must be more of a suck-up, a kiss-ass, whatever it entails, to the dieversity and PC-crap than if you had a year or two’s salary put away to find a new job or even a new career and leave the stupidity behind!

  109. Miro23 says:

    I doubt that anything more drastic than house arrest of state governor and legislators would be necessary to put a stop to it. Two hundred Federal marshals, maybe? Two companies of National Guard troops out of Pennsylvania?

    This is one outcome , but there could be others. In any event, the public would see what was happening regarding their 10th Amendment rights and how the MSM would lie about it.

  110. @Miro23

    Oh, Miro, I meant to compliment you on the Calvin Coolidge quote earlier. Silent Cal was probably the best president of the 20th century. Unfortunately, we are way past the point of being able to use a guy who doesn’t feel he has to do anything but administer the government.

  111. @attilathehen

    attilathehen is another example of Sailer’s Law of Female Journalism/Commenting. She believes that in an America bereft of Asian women, she would be considered hotter-looking / more desirable.

    • Replies: @Truth
  112. bartok says:
    @MarkinLA

    they have decided that the 85% either live like dogs or move to the US

    This is a calumny, like blaming Southern whites for the condition of Southern blacks.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  113. @Stonehands

    And brown/indian/hispanic women are not far behind… possibly worse.

  114. @Joe862

    Absolutely. White people are largely at fault for being lazy parents, not having kids, aborting their kids, or not pushing their kids hard enough.

    So many young white people cannot manage money, are taking a low paying and useless college degree. These people also fall for socialism. I’ve always respected the parenting of other cultures.

    However, as I’ve stated in other comments, other races are catching up as they hit the 2nd generation. Many children of brown people in Canada are actually far more useless and degenerate than the white people. So it’s interesting to see how it will play out.

  115. Truth says:
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    Yeah.

    …Or maybe she just prefers whites who marry whites?

    • Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy
  116. @Achmed E. Newman

    Hi Newmie. You once again prove what I said in another comment for another article. Most of the commentators are gentile/Jewish males involved with Asian females. Hence the degeneracy of the comments.

  117. @Truth

    The West is not black. A black American no matter how long his family has been in the USA is not a Westerner. He is an alien. A newly arrived European who obtains USA citizen is part of the West.

    The Jewish “problem” started after Napoleon released the Jews from their European ghettos. Read Ricardo Duchesne’s book “The Uniqueness of Western Civilization.” Jews had nothing to do with the development of the West. Since the French revolution introduced the ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity, and society became secularized, Jews were able to hold political offices throughout Europe. The problems the West has experienced since have to be evaluated today. The Jews are not wanted in Europe. In the USA, the Jews only came into some power after 1968. Now that they have a country, there is no reason for them to remain in Europe or the USA. This also applies for blacks/Asians/Muslims.

    The new problems we face are coming from the RCC and the Zioevangizers. The RCC is now a majority non-white church so the papacy will have to be moved to either the Congo or the Philippines. The Zioevangizers believe that now the Jews can rebuild the temple. The temple will not be rebuilt. Also, present day Jews are not related to the Jews of the Old Testament. But, if present day “Jews” want to be “Jewish,” they have a country with a capital.

  118. @Truth

    LOL!!! Read my comment no. 119 to Achie Newmie. I used to comment at Taki before they cucked and closed down their comments. I had the same arguments with gentile/Jewish males involved with Asian women. They would become furious at my criticism. Some would try to defend Derbyshire and his Chinese family. It was so funny.

    As I have consistently stated: The West is superior. The East is inferior. If a Westerner cannot make this statement, the East awaits them.

  119. @Truth

    But it’s rare to find a WN who seems to specifically single out Asians. Rare enough that it makes me think that there must be some very specific personal experiences that shaped their world view. Your more typical WN puts Asians maybe 4th or 5th in line when thinking about threats to their White European heritage.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
    , @Truth
  120. @Hapalong Cassidy

    Hap(p)along, there are 4 threats: black/Asians/Jews/Muslims. I’ve noticed that most commentators worry about the Joooooz the most. They are cucked when it comes to Muslims. Some degenerates believe Muslims can be allies against the Jews. Blacks are not liked. Yet, many will state that Asians are smarter than whites. Derbyshire is the best example of this. Although his barely average Chinese hybrid offspring disprove his stupid theory. I figured out why they say Asians are smarter than whites. They have Asian poontang at home fixing them their sammiches.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  121. Anonymous[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    You seem to be strongly pitched at the anecdotal level of evidence and knowledge so let me tell you that, in my quite large extended family, my half East Asian nieces and nephew are all perfectly trilingual, scholarship winners in two cases, clothes catalogue models in two cases, all outstanding (top 1 to 4 per cent) athletically (including surfing, swimming, skiing, running and football), exquisitely artistic in two cases and all very well mannered. Aren’t you glad that the likes of my extended family might be taxpayers who will pay for the likes of you in your old age?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
    , @Truth
  122. @Anonymous

    Have your 1/2 East Asian family members declared that the West is superior to the East? Have they stated they are grateful that their Caucasian blood helped to increase their IQ? Have they stated that Asians are a second tier race? Have they stated that their East Asian country is inferior to any Western nation? What kind of people are they dating? Are they Democrats? Are they 1/2 Jewish?

  123. Truth says:
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    Now, (and this is a mere assumption on my part, maybe Tillie would disagree) I am sure that She would be AT LEAST as offended at a white person who choses a black as a mate, but since the rest of you have that obstruction of humanity so ably covered, Tillie decides to go the road less travelled and attack the obstruction of humanity, the dead-ending of the white race, and bastardly, cowardly race-traiting that the rest of you men so cowardly ignore, and in most cases, even recommend!!!!

    .

    …But again Cassidy, I may be wrong, I do have an IQ circa-85…

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  124. Truth says:
    @Anonymous

    You seem to be strongly pitched at the anecdotal level of evidence and knowledge so let me tell you that, in my quite large extended family, my half East Asian nieces and nephew are all perfectly trilingual, scholarship winners in two cases, clothes catalogue models in two cases, all outstanding (top 1 to 4 per cent) athletically (including surfing, swimming, skiing, running and football), exquisitely artistic in two cases and all very well mannered.

    …And seem to have a strangely consistent yet fervent predilection for flied lice…

    • Replies: @Anon
  125. @Truth

    LOL!!! Yes, I chose the Asian angle because where I live there are Asians and they really believe they are superior to Caucasians. I’ve known how Asians are for years, but when I started viewing nationalist websites and comments I was struck my this bizarre idea that Asians are smarter than whites. This, along with Jewish superiority, is peddled by AmRen and Vdare a great deal. Then I discovered Derbyshire had a Chinese family. I had to analyze these websites and commentators and the degeneracy within them was unbelievable. I have consistently stated facts and provided source materials to disprove Jewish/Asian superiority. Derbyshire is free to go on scribbling his nonsense, but I am free to refute his nonsense.

    As I have stated, I was a cradle Catholic but left the RCC because of black/Asian priests-popes. This started 20 years ago when I went to a church and a dark-skinned, East Indian was the priest. I had heard of priests in Asia and Africa but this was the first time I ever saw one in a church I attended. I was never the same after that so I had to rethink my religion. Through research, I have found the Orthodox church with its racial/ethnic churches is the best for the West. I am a Western, Latin-rite woman and I don’t want to give up statues so we’ll have to create a church with both types of art.

    Your statement about Caucasian males recommending mixing with Asian females is spot on. Asian women are dragon ladies. Their offspring will side with their Asian side. This is even easier today because of international travel. I have seen many of these hybrids consistently side with their Asian side. Derbyshire’s offspring are a perfect example of this. Jewish males marry Asian women, but I have no interest in what Jews do. Because I call out these degenerates, I’ve been called a Zionist troll, not a real Catholic, a blue haired feminist, fat, jealous of Asian women, a man, a troll and a lesbian. LOL!!! Always cherchez la femme/le homme/la famille of a “nationalist.”

    • Replies: @Anon
  126. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Shitlery

    Oh, how the pious have fallen!

  127. Anon[413] • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth

    What makes you think that East Asian means Chinese? Or that the “perfectly trilingual” isn’t true? :-)

  128. Anon[413] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    It’s sad that the smarter more interesting East Asians aren’t attracted to your company.

    BTW what is your explanation for the disproportionate academic success of East Asians and their children in North America, Australasia and the UK?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  129. wraith67 says:

    It’s unlikely that the left will abandon identity politics, and nobody ever asks for less handouts and concessions. War is inevitable, the question is really whether the spark will be government sanctioned abuse against one group for the benefit another rises to an intolerable level or a national financial catastrophe which is coming rapidly.

  130. @Anon

    Anon 413 or 436? Asians are notorious cheaters so I don’t trust their test results. We do get some of the smarter ones in the West. But this begs the question – why aren’t Asian nations the best and most creative in the world? Because Asians are a second tier race who can only copy. The Japanese are the only intelligent Asians who have developed a first world nation. The Chinese, Koreans, Indians, etc. are inferior to the Japanese. The Japanese have world class universities and don’t need to send their people abroad to learn. The Chinese and the rest will never have anything like this.

    Big picture, it was the West who created Western civilization and the modern world of today. Blacks/Asians/Jews/Muslims had nothing to do with this. Asians students need to go back to Asia and try to make Asia great again.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  131. Anonymous[150] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    The Japanese also used to have a reputation for being only cheap imitators of the West. Nations trying to catch up technologically will always have this reputation because at that stage of development imitation is more important than innovation.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  132. MarkinLA says:
    @bartok

    If it is then explain why the 85% live like dogs in a supposed democracy?

  133. @Anonymous

    The Japanese copied Western technology. They could never have invented anything on their own. At least they were very good at copying the West. The rest of Asia will never be like Japan.

  134. Miro23 says:
    @Stonehands

    Revelation 22:11 King James Version (KJV)

    11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.

    Agree with that – go your own way.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS