The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 John Derbyshire ArchiveBlogview
Dawn of the Trumpening
A Muscular Speech, Exemplary People, and No Affirmative Action Poets!
trumptakestheoath

The great news this week was of course the inauguration. Let me go directly to it.

I’m just going to hand you off for a moment to a person who is much smarter than I am: Professor Robert LaFleur, speaking here in lecture 16 of the Great Courses lectures on the Analects of Confucius.

Professor LaFleur has just gotten through describing the abuse of a sacred ritual. There is a mountain in eastern China named Mount Tai, which in ancient times was held to be holy. According to traditional ritual, the holy sacrifices could only be offered to Mount Tai by the Emperor or by the prince of the state where the mountain was situated. Well, the head of a powerful, arrogant family decided that he would make the sacrifice, contrary to ritual. Confucius was very scathing about this. Now I’ll hand you off to Professor LaFleur, who in turn will hand you off to Confucius.

How should ritual work when everything goes beautifully? I have found that a passage coming right after Confucius’ exasperated statement sums up the sage’s most positive feelings about rituals.

Here he discusses a ritual intended to achieve the difficult task of uniting keen competitors. Analects 3.vii: “The Master said: Exemplary people do not compete with one another. The nearest exception is the Archery Ceremony. Greeting and accommodating each other, the archers mount the stairs of the hall. Descending after contesting, they share a drink together. Even when competing they remain exemplary people.”

So if you thought the idea of the two teams lining up to shake hands after a football game originated in the Victorian sporting ethos, or the manners of 19th-century WASP elites, you couldn’t be more wrong. It was going strong twenty-five centuries ago in China; and according to Confucius, the proper observance of rituals like this is the mark of the exemplary person, the 君子. [Junzi]

Thus, when watching the courteous handoff of power at the west front of the U.S. Capitol this morning, we were engaging with the deepest, most fundamental structures of civilized social life. If, like me, you found yourself moved, you were responding as humans have been responding for millennia to collective ritual properly performed for the larger good.

If Confucius was correct—if the proper observance of rituals like this is the mark of the exemplary person—there were some exemplary people out there at the Capitol. Everyone behaved themselves perfectly.

Away from the actual scene of the ceremony, Confucian rectitude was less abundant. When Mrs. Clinton appeared, some voices in the crowd called out: “Lock her up!” And a few blocks away, anti-Trump protestors broke windows and screamed abuse at police. The veneer of civilization is thin indeed.

Civilization was in full display out there on the Capitol steps, though. Let’s be thankful for it.

The content of the ceremony was straightforward and direct in the good American manner, with a minimum of unnecessary wordage. The ceremonial deism was perhaps a little over the top for the quarter of us who are now unbelievers; but the new President seems sincere in his faith, and it was his show, so we shouldn’t complain. Besides, we got a smile out of it. The quick-witted Rev. Franklin Graham noted that it started to rain just as Donald Trump stepped to the podium. “In the Bible,” said Rev. Graham, “rain is the sign of God’s blessing.” That was very nicely done, whatever your metaphysics may be.

Trump’s speech was not too long, and was very Trumpish, very rumbustious. [Full Transcript Here] It sounded, in fact, like the kinds of things he said in the campaign. One of the Fox News commentators said it wasn’t poetic, and it wasn’t. Personally I’m fine with that. Trump is a businessman. I’d be surprised to learn that he has read any poetry since high school. In any case, after eight years of Barack Obama’s lame attempts at soaring oratory, I favor a moratorium on politicians’ attempts at poetry.

One of the blessings of this particular inauguration ceremony, in fact, was the absence of a poet. Five previous inaugural ceremonies—for incoming Democrats in every case—have featured a poet. Robert Frost in 1961 and Miller Williams in 1997 were at least real poets, though their inaugural poems were far from their best. The other three, which included both of Barack Obama’s, were all affirmative action mediocrities reciting meaningless drivel—meaningless and also, of course, meter-less and rhyme-less. My heartfelt personal thanks to the new President for not inviting any poets.

Back to the speech: Dana Perino, also at Fox News, said it was, quote, “very muscular.” I know what she means, and I agree. The speech sure wasn’t flabby or bony. It was mesomorphic. The best bits were the plain calls to nationalism. “A nation exists to serve its citizens.” When was the last time you heard a politician say that? “It is the right of all nations to put their own interests first.” Of course it is! Why did that even need saying? But it did, and I was thrilled to hear my President saying it.

Some other commentators thought the speech too dark. Is the U.S.A. really a wasteland of shuttered factories and devastated inner cities? Are things really that bad? If they are, can Trump—or anyone—fix them?

I’ll make allowances; that was the kind of talk that got Trump elected, and I’m very happy he was elected. Those passages got to my own uneasiness about the speech, though: It was a bit too promissory.

Is he really going to be able to break all those “iron rice bowls” that keep the counties around Washington, D.C. the wealthiest in the nation? Ronald Reagan wanted to do that, too, and Reagan failed. Well, Trump is more energetic than Reagan, and I believe more canny and ruthless; perhaps he’ll pull it off.

I’m not even sure that the evils Trump identified, what he called the “carnage” of rusting factories and derelict inner cities, are today’s issues. The way automation is progressing, all those factories that were shipped abroad will be repatriated to the U.S.A. just in time for their workers to be totally replaced by robots. Likewise, those inner cities are being gentrified and spruced up by yuppies, while their populations are shunted out to Section Eight housing in suburbs like Ferguson, Missouri.

Four years from now, never mind eight, angst about unemployed factory workers and decaying inner cities may sound as quaint as deploring public executions or the conditions in debtors’ prisons.

At the risk of having a mob with pitchforks and flaming brands showing up in my driveway, I have to say I think Jackie Evancho was a mistake for the national anthem. She was plainly nervous. Her voice came across as unsteady and rather small, the enunciation not very good. On the plus side though, I will thank her for sparing us the awful melismas we too often get—a single syllable stretched across many notes. She sang it straight and plain, as it should be sung.

Yes, yes, I know: there was a shortage of celebrities willing to perform at the ceremony. Confucius’ concept of the exemplary person does not have much of a market share among showbiz elites. Still, there are trained opera singers in America waiting tables—I actually know one.

I’m picking nits, of course—that’s my job. We are lucky, after 24 years of unrelieved liberalism, we are lucky to have a man in the White House who doesn’t think that America’s main problem is a shortage of public restrooms for people confused about their sex, or an insufficiently confrontational attitude towards Russia, or a public debt that’s too small, or a historic deficit of mulatto Attorneys General.

Welcome to the Trumpening!

ORDER IT NOW

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He’s had two books published by VDARE.com: FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and From the Dissident Right II: Essays 2013. His writings are archived at JohnDerbyshire.com.

(Reprinted from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
[]
  1. As usual, cogent and accurate observations from John. In light of events in Washington DC and Seattle, Washington, the Obama-Trump transition may be one of the last peaceful ones that we have. Traditions do not go on forever.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are only available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also only be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/dawn-of-the-trumpening/#comment-1736983
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “The best bits were the plain calls to nationalism. ‘A nation exists to serve its citizens.’ When was the last time you heard a politician say that? ‘It is the right of all nations to put their own interests first.’ Of course it is! Why did that even need saying?”

    It is controversial because Jews hear it as: “Gentiles(esp whites) should put their own interests first”, which means Jewish Power has a competitor.

    The unspoken rule of America is everyone and everything must put Jewish and Israeli interests first. Thou shalt have no other interests before ours.

    Now, gentiles putting their own interests first need not be anti-Jewish as long as it is done under Rule of Law. After all, who cares if Mexican-Americans have common interests and work together? Who cares if Arab-Americans have their own identity and interests and create networks to defend their positions? If each group puts its own interest first under the Rule of Law, then there’s no reason for Jews to fear about persecution. The Constitution will still guarantee No Discrimination based on race, color, or creed. So, even if white gentiles have their own interest, meritocracy will continue to favor the best person for the job.

    But apart from professions, different peoples can come together to serve their own social, cultural, and political interests. So, Greek-Americans might come together and lobby Congress to do something about Cyprus. Mexican-Americans might come together to build a community center that preserves Mexican heritage. Arab Christians might come together to pray together in the same church. Muslim-Americans might come together in mosques. Hindu-Americans may have festivities in the park and discuss their own interests and matters. Just because they serve their own interests in the sphere of culture, politics, and social matters doesn’t mean that they are being anti-Jewish.
    And of course, Jews don’t mind non-white groups having their own identities and interests. If anything, Jews encourage such via Multi-Culturalism in the hope that they will be divided among each other and united ONLY IN anti-white hatred as current PC is virulently anti-white.
    Jews obviously don’t like Palestinian-American interests, but the Palestinian community is so weak and pitiable that it doesn’t amount to a plate of beans.

    BUT, Jews cannot abide by white/European Americans having an identity and interests of their own. That is the great taboo. Why? Unlike other gentile groups whose power won’t amount to much, a unified white identity and interests can truly challenge Jewish Power, and we saw this with the rise of Trump(even though he is close to Jews and not anti-Jewish by any means).
    Because whites are still the majority of Americans, ‘nationalism’ and ‘putting American interests first’ sound to Jews like White Identity Politics.
    Now, if the US were white-minority nation, Jews wouldn’t worry so much about American Nationalism since it would then be synonymous with multi-culti stuff like in Brazil. I mean what is Brazilian Nationalism? It’s meaningless as the nation is such a hodge-podge of divisions.

    The great irony is that this ‘America First’ rhetoric seems to be largely formulated by the Jewish Stephen Miller. Maybe some Jews fear that multi-culturalism will be bad for Jews. Maybe they feel nationalism with white majority will be best for the Tribe, esp as BDS stuff gets wilder.
    Are figures like Miller trying to associate implicitly white American Nationalism with Zionist interests?
    Thus, ‘America First’, a slogan once associated with ‘Nazi sympathizer’ Charles Lindbergh, is shifted to a Pact of Steel with Israel at a time when Democrats are on verge of having a party leader who is seen as possibly hostile to Israel.

    We are living in post-modern world when meanings change.

    Consider Obama adopted ‘Forward’, associated with communism. But his priorities were serving Wall Street and the super-capitalists of Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and globalists. And decadent vain homos into ultra-individualism and narcissism than class struggle. It was more like Ass Struggle. So, a communist slogan got associated with globalist capitalism.

    Under Trump, ‘America First’ could fuse American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as partners. Instead of continuing with the formula American Globalism serving Israeli Nationalism(with all its many contradictions as even white conservatives are beginning to ask, “Why nationalism for Jews but not for white nations?), the new template could be American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as brothers and equal partners. If Jews around Trump are okay with both Jewish nationalism and white gentile nationalism(esp in Europe), maybe the European/American Right will stick with Israel and Jews.

    If some Jews can concoct a style that remolds skinhead neo-nazi antics into expression of Jewish power, I suppose even ‘America First’ can be co-opted and remolded.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish

    If some Jews can concoct a style that remolds skinhead neo-nazi antics into expression of Jewish power, I suppose even ‘America First’ can be co-opted and remolded.
     
    Jews have never had a problem with nazis - that is the BIG LIE. In fact, there is no difference between leftist jews and fascists, they are the same! The nazis, like all fascists, were socialists (National Socialist German Worker's Party). The problem for jews was that in condemning nazis for the "holocaust", they knew they were in danger of also condemning their preferred method of wielding power, so they had to devise a method to deflect insight into that truth. Their solution was to claim that fascists are far-right. It is a lie. It has always been a lie, and it is still a lie today. Most jews are fascists and that is why they loved the head plantation nigger, obama.
    , @Buzz Mohawk

    Under Trump, ‘America First’ could fuse American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as partners.
     
    This would be fine. It would signal the coming-of-age of Israel and the renewed independence of the United States.

    Both nations establishing a relationship yet maintaining separate and distinct identities. This is what sovereign nations do. My US would not only have working agreements with Israel, but with any other nation it sees fit to do business with.

    This would be normal, the way things are supposed to be done.
    , @Bill Jones
    "the new template could be American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as brothers and equal partners."

    How stunningly naive. It would be the same sort of partnership enjoyed by you and your tapeworm.
  3. Thanks JD.
    I voted against the Hidebeast but beginning to think President Trump will walk the talk.

    Read More
  4. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Trumpening or not, the Cuckening continues in Ireland.

    Irish ‘progressive’ globalists(brainwashed by Political Correctness) decided to push degenerate homo agenda, enforce emasculating feminist dogma, and welcome massive invasion of low-IQ black Africans who are stronger & more aggressive than native whites. The result is predictable. Same as in Australia. Feral blacks run wild and attack whites.

    US and Brazil are stuck with blacks because of the slave trade. But if your nation has no blacks, don’t take them in. They are low-IQ, aggressive, and stronger. Too many act like thugs and destroy things.
    And don’t fall for the Hollywood bullshit of the Magic Negro. It is a total myth. Never allow immigration into your nation of a people more aggressive and stronger than your own people.

    Blacks look cool because they win in sports and do rap, Blacks seem special because Jew-dominated media promote Martin L. King and Mandela as saints in order to paralyze whites with ‘white guilt’. Blacks seem pitiable because they are poor and backward in Africa.

    But once they come to your nation in big numbers, they act like thugs, beat up your people — the reason they are good at sports is because they are stronger than you –, and destroy one neighborhood after another. And once the damage is done, it can’t be undone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Take a look at Irishsavant blogspot to learn how African blacks behave as soon as they get to Ireland. It's not just robberies its 4 on 1 attacks and brutal bearings.
    There is a lot of aggressive begging around ATMs. One asks for a "loan" while 6 or 7 members of the hunting pack snarl and menace.

    Less than 100 years after they got rid of the English occupation the elected government has re colonized Ireland with Africans

  5. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Congress is still owned by the Globalists.

    So-called Proposition Nation is really Prostitution Nation.

    Read More
  6. It’s the first inauguration I’ve ever watched – or, more accurately, kept half an eye on. Why? Because I thought there was a chance some bugger would shoot him. His opponents include people whose nastiness is on a massive scale compared to Trump’s obvious character flaws.

    So, two celebrations: first, Hellary is still not President; secondly, Trump is still alive.

    Read More
  7. The law suit filed against Trump this morning for accepting “foreign emoluments” is a stark example of BS in the news. Anyone can consult a dictionary to learn the definition of emolument, even CNN and NPR. But if they acknowledged that they knew the definition, they would need to acknowledge that accepting rent, or even royalties on book sales (as Obama surely did) from foreign governments is not accepting emoluments.

    It’s interesting that the root that gives rise to meal, maelstrom, molar and immolation is in emolument. Likely relates to the local monopoly a miller typically held in the middle ages, and the portion of the grist he kept for himself.

    Read More
  8. @Anon
    "The best bits were the plain calls to nationalism. 'A nation exists to serve its citizens.' When was the last time you heard a politician say that? 'It is the right of all nations to put their own interests first.' Of course it is! Why did that even need saying?"

    It is controversial because Jews hear it as: "Gentiles(esp whites) should put their own interests first", which means Jewish Power has a competitor.

    The unspoken rule of America is everyone and everything must put Jewish and Israeli interests first. Thou shalt have no other interests before ours.

    Now, gentiles putting their own interests first need not be anti-Jewish as long as it is done under Rule of Law. After all, who cares if Mexican-Americans have common interests and work together? Who cares if Arab-Americans have their own identity and interests and create networks to defend their positions? If each group puts its own interest first under the Rule of Law, then there's no reason for Jews to fear about persecution. The Constitution will still guarantee No Discrimination based on race, color, or creed. So, even if white gentiles have their own interest, meritocracy will continue to favor the best person for the job.

    But apart from professions, different peoples can come together to serve their own social, cultural, and political interests. So, Greek-Americans might come together and lobby Congress to do something about Cyprus. Mexican-Americans might come together to build a community center that preserves Mexican heritage. Arab Christians might come together to pray together in the same church. Muslim-Americans might come together in mosques. Hindu-Americans may have festivities in the park and discuss their own interests and matters. Just because they serve their own interests in the sphere of culture, politics, and social matters doesn't mean that they are being anti-Jewish.
    And of course, Jews don't mind non-white groups having their own identities and interests. If anything, Jews encourage such via Multi-Culturalism in the hope that they will be divided among each other and united ONLY IN anti-white hatred as current PC is virulently anti-white.
    Jews obviously don't like Palestinian-American interests, but the Palestinian community is so weak and pitiable that it doesn't amount to a plate of beans.

    BUT, Jews cannot abide by white/European Americans having an identity and interests of their own. That is the great taboo. Why? Unlike other gentile groups whose power won't amount to much, a unified white identity and interests can truly challenge Jewish Power, and we saw this with the rise of Trump(even though he is close to Jews and not anti-Jewish by any means).
    Because whites are still the majority of Americans, 'nationalism' and 'putting American interests first' sound to Jews like White Identity Politics.
    Now, if the US were white-minority nation, Jews wouldn't worry so much about American Nationalism since it would then be synonymous with multi-culti stuff like in Brazil. I mean what is Brazilian Nationalism? It's meaningless as the nation is such a hodge-podge of divisions.

    The great irony is that this 'America First' rhetoric seems to be largely formulated by the Jewish Stephen Miller. Maybe some Jews fear that multi-culturalism will be bad for Jews. Maybe they feel nationalism with white majority will be best for the Tribe, esp as BDS stuff gets wilder.
    Are figures like Miller trying to associate implicitly white American Nationalism with Zionist interests?
    Thus, 'America First', a slogan once associated with 'Nazi sympathizer' Charles Lindbergh, is shifted to a Pact of Steel with Israel at a time when Democrats are on verge of having a party leader who is seen as possibly hostile to Israel.

    We are living in post-modern world when meanings change.

    Consider Obama adopted 'Forward', associated with communism. But his priorities were serving Wall Street and the super-capitalists of Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and globalists. And decadent vain homos into ultra-individualism and narcissism than class struggle. It was more like Ass Struggle. So, a communist slogan got associated with globalist capitalism.

    Under Trump, 'America First' could fuse American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as partners. Instead of continuing with the formula American Globalism serving Israeli Nationalism(with all its many contradictions as even white conservatives are beginning to ask, "Why nationalism for Jews but not for white nations?), the new template could be American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as brothers and equal partners. If Jews around Trump are okay with both Jewish nationalism and white gentile nationalism(esp in Europe), maybe the European/American Right will stick with Israel and Jews.

    If some Jews can concoct a style that remolds skinhead neo-nazi antics into expression of Jewish power, I suppose even 'America First' can be co-opted and remolded.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdqEbdglqhI

    If some Jews can concoct a style that remolds skinhead neo-nazi antics into expression of Jewish power, I suppose even ‘America First’ can be co-opted and remolded.

    Jews have never had a problem with nazis – that is the BIG LIE. In fact, there is no difference between leftist jews and fascists, they are the same! The nazis, like all fascists, were socialists (National Socialist German Worker’s Party). The problem for jews was that in condemning nazis for the “holocaust”, they knew they were in danger of also condemning their preferred method of wielding power, so they had to devise a method to deflect insight into that truth. Their solution was to claim that fascists are far-right. It is a lie. It has always been a lie, and it is still a lie today. Most jews are fascists and that is why they loved the head plantation nigger, obama.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    ya know what I just found out?

    Hitler was a flaming queer!

    That's what Jewish writer Samuel Igra wrote in 1945:


    In 1945 a Jewish historian by the name of Samuel Igra published Germany's National Vice, which called homosexuality the "poisoned stream" that ran through the heart of Nazism. (In the 1920s and 30s, homosexuality was known as "the German vice" across Europe because of the debaucheries of the Weimar period.)
    Igra, who escaped Germany in 1939, claims that Hitler "had been a male prostitute in Vienna at the time of his sojourn there, from 1907 to 1912, and that he practiced the same calling in Munich from 1912 to 1914" (Igra:67).
    Desmond Seward, in Napoleon and Hitler, says Hitler is listed as a homosexual in Viennese police records The Pink Swastika by Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams.

    Hitler was a sexual deviant who would do anything to hide his sexual proclivities from the public. This made him a puppet to any foreign country or ideology with the knowledge on him. This is known as "the wood" on a person and anyone with 'the wood' has control over that person. .
    .....Hans Mend: "In 1915 we were billeted in a brewery and slept in the hay. Hitler was bedded down at night with Schmidtl, his male whore. We heard a rustling in the hay. Then someone switched on his electric flashlight and growled 'look at those two faggots'.....
    Many of the highest-placed leaders in the Nazi party, including Hitler, Roehm, Forster, von Schirach and almost all of his bodyguards were gay.
    Hitler surrounded himself with homosexuals and even retrieved Roehm from Bolivia, making him Deputy Fuhrer. This knowledge enabled outside countries like Britain and ideologies like the Freemasons lo control Hitler, his high command and his bodyguards. Hitler and his band of merry bandits became puppets with wooden strings. In this way, any foreign society can be destroyed with a leader hiding their sexuality. Hitler, Roehm, Forster and von Schirach took part in destroying their own societies while enjoying the power it gave them. Hitler was a double agent prime minister. He worked for a foreign country (Britain) and a foreign ideology (the Freemasons). The formula proved so effective it is still used today, in politics and the media, especially with TV personalities, radio announcers, prime ministers and presidents, both male and female. Hitler was a British Agent by Greg Hallett p.65 http://whale.to/b/myth1.html
     

    Don't that turn the Jewish homo apple cart into rancid vinegar.

    Now why do you suppose the Hollywood gang that simply can't restrain itself from producing anti-Hitler movies hasn't drilled right in on Hitler the Homo? Why no, "I was Hitler's Butch." Can't you just picture BOLD Red swastika banners rendered through the ubiquitous rainbow filter? It would be a HUGE hit at PR agencies from DC to New York. Liberals would climb all over each other to be the first to embrace the Rainbow Swastika, maybe create a huge new meme, maybe immortalize your PR firm: WE Brought Hitler Out of the Closet, YES WE DID!

    Because that would give the game away; it would spill the beans; it would pull the curtain back and allow the ROW to see just who is "manipulating the wood" and how the time-honored method of debauching an individual, or an entire society, is done, the better to gain dominance and control over that puppet, person or polity.

    , @Cloak And Dagger
    @woodNfish

    Very well said - I couldn't agree more. In this postmodernist world, traditional words have no meaning as they can describe opposing connotations. We have seen Trotskyites transform into neoliberals and neocons - they are even the same individuals donning different mantles but with the same nefarious intent.
  9. @Anon
    "The best bits were the plain calls to nationalism. 'A nation exists to serve its citizens.' When was the last time you heard a politician say that? 'It is the right of all nations to put their own interests first.' Of course it is! Why did that even need saying?"

    It is controversial because Jews hear it as: "Gentiles(esp whites) should put their own interests first", which means Jewish Power has a competitor.

    The unspoken rule of America is everyone and everything must put Jewish and Israeli interests first. Thou shalt have no other interests before ours.

    Now, gentiles putting their own interests first need not be anti-Jewish as long as it is done under Rule of Law. After all, who cares if Mexican-Americans have common interests and work together? Who cares if Arab-Americans have their own identity and interests and create networks to defend their positions? If each group puts its own interest first under the Rule of Law, then there's no reason for Jews to fear about persecution. The Constitution will still guarantee No Discrimination based on race, color, or creed. So, even if white gentiles have their own interest, meritocracy will continue to favor the best person for the job.

    But apart from professions, different peoples can come together to serve their own social, cultural, and political interests. So, Greek-Americans might come together and lobby Congress to do something about Cyprus. Mexican-Americans might come together to build a community center that preserves Mexican heritage. Arab Christians might come together to pray together in the same church. Muslim-Americans might come together in mosques. Hindu-Americans may have festivities in the park and discuss their own interests and matters. Just because they serve their own interests in the sphere of culture, politics, and social matters doesn't mean that they are being anti-Jewish.
    And of course, Jews don't mind non-white groups having their own identities and interests. If anything, Jews encourage such via Multi-Culturalism in the hope that they will be divided among each other and united ONLY IN anti-white hatred as current PC is virulently anti-white.
    Jews obviously don't like Palestinian-American interests, but the Palestinian community is so weak and pitiable that it doesn't amount to a plate of beans.

    BUT, Jews cannot abide by white/European Americans having an identity and interests of their own. That is the great taboo. Why? Unlike other gentile groups whose power won't amount to much, a unified white identity and interests can truly challenge Jewish Power, and we saw this with the rise of Trump(even though he is close to Jews and not anti-Jewish by any means).
    Because whites are still the majority of Americans, 'nationalism' and 'putting American interests first' sound to Jews like White Identity Politics.
    Now, if the US were white-minority nation, Jews wouldn't worry so much about American Nationalism since it would then be synonymous with multi-culti stuff like in Brazil. I mean what is Brazilian Nationalism? It's meaningless as the nation is such a hodge-podge of divisions.

    The great irony is that this 'America First' rhetoric seems to be largely formulated by the Jewish Stephen Miller. Maybe some Jews fear that multi-culturalism will be bad for Jews. Maybe they feel nationalism with white majority will be best for the Tribe, esp as BDS stuff gets wilder.
    Are figures like Miller trying to associate implicitly white American Nationalism with Zionist interests?
    Thus, 'America First', a slogan once associated with 'Nazi sympathizer' Charles Lindbergh, is shifted to a Pact of Steel with Israel at a time when Democrats are on verge of having a party leader who is seen as possibly hostile to Israel.

    We are living in post-modern world when meanings change.

    Consider Obama adopted 'Forward', associated with communism. But his priorities were serving Wall Street and the super-capitalists of Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and globalists. And decadent vain homos into ultra-individualism and narcissism than class struggle. It was more like Ass Struggle. So, a communist slogan got associated with globalist capitalism.

    Under Trump, 'America First' could fuse American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as partners. Instead of continuing with the formula American Globalism serving Israeli Nationalism(with all its many contradictions as even white conservatives are beginning to ask, "Why nationalism for Jews but not for white nations?), the new template could be American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as brothers and equal partners. If Jews around Trump are okay with both Jewish nationalism and white gentile nationalism(esp in Europe), maybe the European/American Right will stick with Israel and Jews.

    If some Jews can concoct a style that remolds skinhead neo-nazi antics into expression of Jewish power, I suppose even 'America First' can be co-opted and remolded.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdqEbdglqhI

    Under Trump, ‘America First’ could fuse American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as partners.

    This would be fine. It would signal the coming-of-age of Israel and the renewed independence of the United States.

    Both nations establishing a relationship yet maintaining separate and distinct identities. This is what sovereign nations do. My US would not only have working agreements with Israel, but with any other nation it sees fit to do business with.

    This would be normal, the way things are supposed to be done.

    Read More
  10. John

    I want to state unequivocably…categorically…with 0 ambiguity….that the anti-Commie-Cold War Crusade of Peter Brimelow and other former Reagan Yoots destroyed the Historic Native Born White American Nation. In addition to homo-pedohile norming socially conservative Vietnam….the Cold War Crusade unleashed the Civil Rights Movement for the Negro…inflicted upon White Women rape victims of the Negro.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    John

    One of the most horrific crime of gang rape occured on Memorial Day weekend some years ago....the infamous Syosset Diner Gang rape. My older Cousin was one of the victims...her boyfriend was forced to watch a gunpoint. I was a child at the time..and I remember my cousin as an outgoing decent kind human being. She never recovered from the trauma. The White waitress who was stripped naked in the back kitchen was orally raped by a 6' 5" Jamaica legal immigrant...his co-gang Rapists took their turns. This White waitress ended up marrying the Nassau County Police Officer who was first police officer on the crime scene..they went on to have six children(A Greek immigrant at the Golden D0lphin Diner in a conversation....owner?.....told me this a few years back...to quote:"You can not believe what they did to her...."


    The gang rape was carried out by Negros born in Jamaica.

    I blame the Cold War anti-c0mmie crusade for what happened that night. There is a direct policy road from the end of WW2...to the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act via integration of the US Military...which was a direct policy consequence of the Cold War.


    You should go to library and read the Newsday microfiche for the day-by-day coverage of this horrific crime. I surprised that you have never heard about this enormous negro crime..or written about it.
    , @Diversity Heretic
    Kruschev's revenge? Maybe Russia, although not the Soviet Union, will be the long term winner of the Cold War. I learned that Kruschev's line, "We will bury you," can also be translated, "We will outlive you." Could the wily peasant have been right?
  11. @War for Blair Mountain
    John


    I want to state unequivocably...categorically...with 0 ambiguity....that the anti-Commie-Cold War Crusade of Peter Brimelow and other former Reagan Yoots destroyed the Historic Native Born White American Nation. In addition to homo-pedohile norming socially conservative Vietnam....the Cold War Crusade unleashed the Civil Rights Movement for the Negro...inflicted upon White Women rape victims of the Negro.

    John

    One of the most horrific crime of gang rape occured on Memorial Day weekend some years ago….the infamous Syosset Diner Gang rape. My older Cousin was one of the victims…her boyfriend was forced to watch a gunpoint. I was a child at the time..and I remember my cousin as an outgoing decent kind human being. She never recovered from the trauma. The White waitress who was stripped naked in the back kitchen was orally raped by a 6′ 5″ Jamaica legal immigrant…his co-gang Rapists took their turns. This White waitress ended up marrying the Nassau County Police Officer who was first police officer on the crime scene..they went on to have six children(A Greek immigrant at the Golden D0lphin Diner in a conversation….owner?…..told me this a few years back…to quote:”You can not believe what they did to her….”

    The gang rape was carried out by Negros born in Jamaica.

    I blame the Cold War anti-c0mmie crusade for what happened that night. There is a direct policy road from the end of WW2…to the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act via integration of the US Military…which was a direct policy consequence of the Cold War.

    You should go to library and read the Newsday microfiche for the day-by-day coverage of this horrific crime. I surprised that you have never heard about this enormous negro crime..or written about it.

    Read More
  12. @War for Blair Mountain
    John


    I want to state unequivocably...categorically...with 0 ambiguity....that the anti-Commie-Cold War Crusade of Peter Brimelow and other former Reagan Yoots destroyed the Historic Native Born White American Nation. In addition to homo-pedohile norming socially conservative Vietnam....the Cold War Crusade unleashed the Civil Rights Movement for the Negro...inflicted upon White Women rape victims of the Negro.

    Kruschev’s revenge? Maybe Russia, although not the Soviet Union, will be the long term winner of the Cold War. I learned that Kruschev’s line, “We will bury you,” can also be translated, “We will outlive you.” Could the wily peasant have been right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    We weren't invaded and conquered by Russian Commies...we were invaded by Negro Legal Immigrants....Muslim Legal Immigrants...and Chinese Legal Immigrants....



    John

    On Jericho Trunpike..rte 25...now the 50's deco malt shop themed restaurant...the 6' 5" inch negro beast now walks free...when he should have been publicly castrated instead....and then dipped in a vat of car battery acid.
  13. @Diversity Heretic
    Kruschev's revenge? Maybe Russia, although not the Soviet Union, will be the long term winner of the Cold War. I learned that Kruschev's line, "We will bury you," can also be translated, "We will outlive you." Could the wily peasant have been right?

    We weren’t invaded and conquered by Russian Commies…we were invaded by Negro Legal Immigrants….Muslim Legal Immigrants…and Chinese Legal Immigrants….

    John

    On Jericho Trunpike..rte 25…now the 50′s deco malt shop themed restaurant…the 6′ 5″ inch negro beast now walks free…when he should have been publicly castrated instead….and then dipped in a vat of car battery acid.

    Read More
  14. The way automation is progressing, all those factories that were shipped abroad will be repatriated to the U.S.A. just in time for their workers to be totally replaced by robots.

    That’s largely a question of government policy. American workers can be divided into those with protected jobs, and those without them. What makes an occupation protected is not, for the most part, the immense skill and brain-power it takes to carry it out. There’s no inherent economic reason why the highly credentialed are given generous protection from the forces of international competition which everyone else has to deal with – they are simply a politically powerful group who have managed to get the laws made so as to protect themselves and leave everyone else exposed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    You hit the nail on the head. Watch the elitist lawyers suddenly rail against outsourcing and globalism if we let foreigners practice law here without going to an ABA-accredited law school or passing a US bar exam. Same with the heartless pricks we call doctors.
    , @Eustace Tilley (not)
    A very interesting comment.

    A nationalist government -- let's say, N -- can make it state policy to encourage some occupations -- say, rice farmers -- even against the dogma of "free trade". Rice farmers are the ultimate security blanket against an adversary starving her population in a war by cutting of a hypothetical "more economical" supply of cheap Burmese/Vietnamese/etc. rice. Rice farmers are also important culturally, a living link to ancient N and thus worth keeping.

    China had monopolies on silk, porcelain (Kao Lin), and tea for centuries. Not much "free trade" by the Celestial Empire then.

  15. God that’s a beautiful photograph.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    God that’s a beautiful photograph.
     
    Yeah, The Donna and her husband cut a dashing figure.
    , @Johnny Smoggins
    Melania's such a contrast to the baboon that Obama is married to.
  16. @Buzz Mohawk
    God that's a beautiful photograph.

    God that’s a beautiful photograph.

    Yeah, The Donna and her husband cut a dashing figure.

    Read More
  17. John

    Go google it:The Syosset Diner robbery gang rape. White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point…and have sex with other couples…and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.

    David Dinkins right hand man man Bill White…graduate of Greenport High School said:”just a bunch of White People complaining again about Black Males”…my late 0lder brother taped these comments of Bill White during an interview on the radio during the NYC Mayoral race.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point…and have sex with other couples…and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.
     
    Oh, so the black folks saved the white folks a few hours of small-talk, and a couple of hundred bucks in liquor and drugs?
  18. @Greenstalk

    The way automation is progressing, all those factories that were shipped abroad will be repatriated to the U.S.A. just in time for their workers to be totally replaced by robots.
     
    That's largely a question of government policy. American workers can be divided into those with protected jobs, and those without them. What makes an occupation protected is not, for the most part, the immense skill and brain-power it takes to carry it out. There's no inherent economic reason why the highly credentialed are given generous protection from the forces of international competition which everyone else has to deal with - they are simply a politically powerful group who have managed to get the laws made so as to protect themselves and leave everyone else exposed.

    You hit the nail on the head. Watch the elitist lawyers suddenly rail against outsourcing and globalism if we let foreigners practice law here without going to an ABA-accredited law school or passing a US bar exam. Same with the heartless pricks we call doctors.

    Read More
  19. @War for Blair Mountain
    John

    Go google it:The Syosset Diner robbery gang rape. White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point...and have sex with other couples...and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.

    David Dinkins right hand man man Bill White...graduate of Greenport High School said:"just a bunch of White People complaining again about Black Males"...my late 0lder brother taped these comments of Bill White during an interview on the radio during the NYC Mayoral race.

    White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point…and have sex with other couples…and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.

    Oh, so the black folks saved the white folks a few hours of small-talk, and a couple of hundred bucks in liquor and drugs?

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    The White Women were gang raped in front of their naked pistol-whipped husbands who were forced to watch..This Negro beast gang-tape took place in a Family Dinner onn Jericho Turnpike in Syosset a few miles down the road from the Derbyshires.
    , @Anonymous Nephew
    Truth (the real one) is usually an interesting commenter, but this is really not funny. Shame on you.
    , @res
    I just Googled it. Truth, are you honestly making a joke about what happened?
    , @Authenticjazzman
    [Spewing forth endless numbers of short, content-free insults is not good behavior. If all your future comments were trashed, the discussion would lose nothing and no other commenter would even notice your permanent disappearance.]

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.
    , @Johnny Smoggins
    At least they didn't eat them so there's that. I guess two hundred years in America has had somewhat of a civilizing effect on your species.
  20. @Anon
    Trumpening or not, the Cuckening continues in Ireland.

    Irish 'progressive' globalists(brainwashed by Political Correctness) decided to push degenerate homo agenda, enforce emasculating feminist dogma, and welcome massive invasion of low-IQ black Africans who are stronger & more aggressive than native whites. The result is predictable. Same as in Australia. Feral blacks run wild and attack whites.

    US and Brazil are stuck with blacks because of the slave trade. But if your nation has no blacks, don't take them in. They are low-IQ, aggressive, and stronger. Too many act like thugs and destroy things.
    And don't fall for the Hollywood bullshit of the Magic Negro. It is a total myth. Never allow immigration into your nation of a people more aggressive and stronger than your own people.

    Blacks look cool because they win in sports and do rap, Blacks seem special because Jew-dominated media promote Martin L. King and Mandela as saints in order to paralyze whites with 'white guilt'. Blacks seem pitiable because they are poor and backward in Africa.

    But once they come to your nation in big numbers, they act like thugs, beat up your people -- the reason they are good at sports is because they are stronger than you --, and destroy one neighborhood after another. And once the damage is done, it can't be undone.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuwIpfaNV2Y

    Take a look at Irishsavant blogspot to learn how African blacks behave as soon as they get to Ireland. It’s not just robberies its 4 on 1 attacks and brutal bearings.
    There is a lot of aggressive begging around ATMs. One asks for a “loan” while 6 or 7 members of the hunting pack snarl and menace.

    Less than 100 years after they got rid of the English occupation the elected government has re colonized Ireland with Africans

    Read More
  21. As we traveled across America this autumn, far from the interstates, the landscape of empty stores, shuttered factories and palpable economic malaise was no rhetorical illusion. Thousands of miles of it, with nary a Clinton sign.

    Read More
  22. “A nation exists to serve its citizens.” …“It is the right of all nations to put their own interests first.” Of course it is! Why did that even need saying?

    It needs saying because myths typically need reinforcing. High priests of one sort or another have historically been pretty good at it for some (wink, wink!) reason.

    You would have been closer to the truth had you written,

    A nation should exist to serve its citizens.

    But even then, it would only be the expression of some Utopian ideal as unobtainable as it is attractive, because who can define what the “national interest is” especially in a very populous nation? Just look at Israel for example. Even in that relatively small nation there never was any consensus on what constitutes the “national interest.”

    Nationalist sentimentalists need to bone up on the results of the Age of Nationalism, which are generally pretty similar to the results of the Age(s) of Empire, but I’d advise avoiding the Great Course series for insights into those histories. It’s my impression that those courses offer the usual misleading, hagiographic, pabulum and mythology, meant for mass consumption.

    Anyway, nations, as we’re discussing them today, are nothing more than somewhat efficient wealth transfer agencies and what shouldn’t need describing or explaining are the facts about how and where that stuff flows.

    Most people today sneer at the concept of tribalism, but nationalism is tribalism on steroids.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greenstalk

    Most people today sneer at the concept of tribalism, but nationalism is tribalism on steroids.
     
    Who are these "most people'? The entire Left is made up of people whose first and only impulse is tribalism. The only tribalism they sneer at is other peoples tribalism, not their own.
    , @geokat62

    ... because who can define what the “national interest is”
     
    Isn't that what parliaments are for?
  23. @Truth

    White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point…and have sex with other couples…and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.
     
    Oh, so the black folks saved the white folks a few hours of small-talk, and a couple of hundred bucks in liquor and drugs?

    The White Women were gang raped in front of their naked pistol-whipped husbands who were forced to watch..This Negro beast gang-tape took place in a Family Dinner onn Jericho Turnpike in Syosset a few miles down the road from the Derbyshires.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    This happened in 1982, and all five were convicted, Al(abaster) Sharpton.

    Hey, come to think of it, that was even 10 years before OJ.

  24. Confucius say both Clinton and Trump inferior persons. The Mandate of Heaven has definitively passed from the United States of America.

    Read More
  25. The idiot media’s cumbersome news cycle is in a shambles. It’s breathtaking.

    Trump: OK, we’re moving on Obamacare.
    Media: Skreeeee! Zillions will die and-
    Trump: EPA. Laying some pipelines, baby!
    Media: Wait! We’re still establishing narrative and-
    Trump: Build the wall, deportation time! Bam!
    Media: Wait! Stop! Skreeee! Skreee! Skreeeeeeeee!

    (two years later)

    Trump: The combined robot and drone strike forces have nearly eliminated every radical Islsmist asset, and surrounded international fugitive George Soros in his secret ice fortress.
    Media: Oh, yes, daddy. Grab me where I love it! Give me more! Don’t stop!

    Read More
  26. @War for Blair Mountain
    The White Women were gang raped in front of their naked pistol-whipped husbands who were forced to watch..This Negro beast gang-tape took place in a Family Dinner onn Jericho Turnpike in Syosset a few miles down the road from the Derbyshires.

    This happened in 1982, and all five were convicted, Al(abaster) Sharpton.

    Hey, come to think of it, that was even 10 years before OJ.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res

    Al(abaster) Sharpton
     
    Thanks for that, but I think I'll be getting much better use out of it than you. It is tailor made for whites spewing anti-white rhetoric. Though it looks not to be original with you, there is an "Alabaster Sharpton" on both Facebook and Google+
  27. @Anon
    "The best bits were the plain calls to nationalism. 'A nation exists to serve its citizens.' When was the last time you heard a politician say that? 'It is the right of all nations to put their own interests first.' Of course it is! Why did that even need saying?"

    It is controversial because Jews hear it as: "Gentiles(esp whites) should put their own interests first", which means Jewish Power has a competitor.

    The unspoken rule of America is everyone and everything must put Jewish and Israeli interests first. Thou shalt have no other interests before ours.

    Now, gentiles putting their own interests first need not be anti-Jewish as long as it is done under Rule of Law. After all, who cares if Mexican-Americans have common interests and work together? Who cares if Arab-Americans have their own identity and interests and create networks to defend their positions? If each group puts its own interest first under the Rule of Law, then there's no reason for Jews to fear about persecution. The Constitution will still guarantee No Discrimination based on race, color, or creed. So, even if white gentiles have their own interest, meritocracy will continue to favor the best person for the job.

    But apart from professions, different peoples can come together to serve their own social, cultural, and political interests. So, Greek-Americans might come together and lobby Congress to do something about Cyprus. Mexican-Americans might come together to build a community center that preserves Mexican heritage. Arab Christians might come together to pray together in the same church. Muslim-Americans might come together in mosques. Hindu-Americans may have festivities in the park and discuss their own interests and matters. Just because they serve their own interests in the sphere of culture, politics, and social matters doesn't mean that they are being anti-Jewish.
    And of course, Jews don't mind non-white groups having their own identities and interests. If anything, Jews encourage such via Multi-Culturalism in the hope that they will be divided among each other and united ONLY IN anti-white hatred as current PC is virulently anti-white.
    Jews obviously don't like Palestinian-American interests, but the Palestinian community is so weak and pitiable that it doesn't amount to a plate of beans.

    BUT, Jews cannot abide by white/European Americans having an identity and interests of their own. That is the great taboo. Why? Unlike other gentile groups whose power won't amount to much, a unified white identity and interests can truly challenge Jewish Power, and we saw this with the rise of Trump(even though he is close to Jews and not anti-Jewish by any means).
    Because whites are still the majority of Americans, 'nationalism' and 'putting American interests first' sound to Jews like White Identity Politics.
    Now, if the US were white-minority nation, Jews wouldn't worry so much about American Nationalism since it would then be synonymous with multi-culti stuff like in Brazil. I mean what is Brazilian Nationalism? It's meaningless as the nation is such a hodge-podge of divisions.

    The great irony is that this 'America First' rhetoric seems to be largely formulated by the Jewish Stephen Miller. Maybe some Jews fear that multi-culturalism will be bad for Jews. Maybe they feel nationalism with white majority will be best for the Tribe, esp as BDS stuff gets wilder.
    Are figures like Miller trying to associate implicitly white American Nationalism with Zionist interests?
    Thus, 'America First', a slogan once associated with 'Nazi sympathizer' Charles Lindbergh, is shifted to a Pact of Steel with Israel at a time when Democrats are on verge of having a party leader who is seen as possibly hostile to Israel.

    We are living in post-modern world when meanings change.

    Consider Obama adopted 'Forward', associated with communism. But his priorities were serving Wall Street and the super-capitalists of Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and globalists. And decadent vain homos into ultra-individualism and narcissism than class struggle. It was more like Ass Struggle. So, a communist slogan got associated with globalist capitalism.

    Under Trump, 'America First' could fuse American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as partners. Instead of continuing with the formula American Globalism serving Israeli Nationalism(with all its many contradictions as even white conservatives are beginning to ask, "Why nationalism for Jews but not for white nations?), the new template could be American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as brothers and equal partners. If Jews around Trump are okay with both Jewish nationalism and white gentile nationalism(esp in Europe), maybe the European/American Right will stick with Israel and Jews.

    If some Jews can concoct a style that remolds skinhead neo-nazi antics into expression of Jewish power, I suppose even 'America First' can be co-opted and remolded.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdqEbdglqhI

    “the new template could be American Nationalism and Israeli Nationalism as brothers and equal partners.”

    How stunningly naive. It would be the same sort of partnership enjoyed by you and your tapeworm.

    Read More
  28. @Truth

    White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point…and have sex with other couples…and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.
     
    Oh, so the black folks saved the white folks a few hours of small-talk, and a couple of hundred bucks in liquor and drugs?

    Truth (the real one) is usually an interesting commenter, but this is really not funny. Shame on you.

    Read More
  29. @Truth

    White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point…and have sex with other couples…and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.
     
    Oh, so the black folks saved the white folks a few hours of small-talk, and a couple of hundred bucks in liquor and drugs?

    I just Googled it. Truth, are you honestly making a joke about what happened?

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Possibly as high as 30 White W0men...Wives...teenage girls...were gang raped that night.

    The most brutal of the negro beasts was a 6' 5" Jamaican Legal Immigrant....who now builds furniture in Brooklyn NY...20 years...back on the street. Two weeks prior to the Syosset Diner robbery and mass nehro gang rape...these negros beasts robbed a home in Westbury....right down the street from Saint Brigids-Holy Rood Cemetery....They crushed the skull in of a White WW2 Vet who landed on Normandy Beach. He was murdered in Cold Blood. This was practice for the Syosset dinner robbery.

    I would have preferred not obliterating Vietnam in the name of homosexual-pedophile-rights-Log Cabin Republican Pedophile tours to Vietnam 2017...then to integrating the US Millitary...which was a direct road to the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act...which inflicted this 6' 5" Negro Jamaican Beast on Native Born White American Wives and Teenage Daughters.
    , @Truth
    This was 35 years ago, Chief, people have been dying, killing, and raping each other since Cain and Abel.
  30. @Truth
    This happened in 1982, and all five were convicted, Al(abaster) Sharpton.

    Hey, come to think of it, that was even 10 years before OJ.

    Al(abaster) Sharpton

    Thanks for that, but I think I’ll be getting much better use out of it than you. It is tailor made for whites spewing anti-white rhetoric. Though it looks not to be original with you, there is an “Alabaster Sharpton” on both Facebook and Google+

    Read More
  31. @res
    I just Googled it. Truth, are you honestly making a joke about what happened?

    Possibly as high as 30 White W0men…Wives…teenage girls…were gang raped that night.

    The most brutal of the negro beasts was a 6′ 5″ Jamaican Legal Immigrant….who now builds furniture in Brooklyn NY…20 years…back on the street. Two weeks prior to the Syosset Diner robbery and mass nehro gang rape…these negros beasts robbed a home in Westbury….right down the street from Saint Brigids-Holy Rood Cemetery….They crushed the skull in of a White WW2 Vet who landed on Normandy Beach. He was murdered in Cold Blood. This was practice for the Syosset dinner robbery.

    I would have preferred not obliterating Vietnam in the name of homosexual-pedophile-rights-Log Cabin Republican Pedophile tours to Vietnam 2017…then to integrating the US Millitary…which was a direct road to the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act…which inflicted this 6′ 5″ Negro Jamaican Beast on Native Born White American Wives and Teenage Daughters.

    Read More
  32. @War for Blair Mountain
    We weren't invaded and conquered by Russian Commies...we were invaded by Negro Legal Immigrants....Muslim Legal Immigrants...and Chinese Legal Immigrants....



    John

    On Jericho Trunpike..rte 25...now the 50's deco malt shop themed restaurant...the 6' 5" inch negro beast now walks free...when he should have been publicly castrated instead....and then dipped in a vat of car battery acid.

    Don’t forget the Hindoos…

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    reuphen

    This past Saturday...SNL...Native Born White Americans are taunted on national TV by the spoiled arrogant son of two Indian Legal Immigrants...father a gastro specialist. There was-is 0 economic case for importing Indian Legal Immigrants...they are a hostile Asian Fifth Column that POTUS Trump is very found of. Paul Kersey twitter should be very careful about who he worships....

    And don't forget Aziz Pai...seriously F....Trump...and after the his first War Crime in collusion with the Saudis in Yemen yesterday.

    I make no distinction between the Syosset Diner robbery and Trump's pick for the FCC...
  33. @res
    I just Googled it. Truth, are you honestly making a joke about what happened?

    This was 35 years ago, Chief, people have been dying, killing, and raping each other since Cain and Abel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    Yes, but that incident was particularly brutal and grotesque. Do you make a habit of joking about murder and rape? Especially such egregious examples. (yes, some of the date "rape" lunacy can be funny, and Michael Brown gave cause to be shot blatantly enough I can see making jokes about that, though I probably would not, and that was not murder as well)

    It would serve you well to remember that even though 35 years is a long time it falls well within many people's lifetimes. Any thoughts on how you would feel if someone who lost a family member in that incident came across your "joke"?
  34. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @woodNfish

    If some Jews can concoct a style that remolds skinhead neo-nazi antics into expression of Jewish power, I suppose even ‘America First’ can be co-opted and remolded.
     
    Jews have never had a problem with nazis - that is the BIG LIE. In fact, there is no difference between leftist jews and fascists, they are the same! The nazis, like all fascists, were socialists (National Socialist German Worker's Party). The problem for jews was that in condemning nazis for the "holocaust", they knew they were in danger of also condemning their preferred method of wielding power, so they had to devise a method to deflect insight into that truth. Their solution was to claim that fascists are far-right. It is a lie. It has always been a lie, and it is still a lie today. Most jews are fascists and that is why they loved the head plantation nigger, obama.

    ya know what I just found out?

    Hitler was a flaming queer!

    That’s what Jewish writer Samuel Igra wrote in 1945:

    In 1945 a Jewish historian by the name of Samuel Igra published Germany’s National Vice, which called homosexuality the “poisoned stream” that ran through the heart of Nazism. (In the 1920s and 30s, homosexuality was known as “the German vice” across Europe because of the debaucheries of the Weimar period.)
    Igra, who escaped Germany in 1939, claims that Hitler “had been a male prostitute in Vienna at the time of his sojourn there, from 1907 to 1912, and that he practiced the same calling in Munich from 1912 to 1914″ (Igra:67).
    Desmond Seward, in Napoleon and Hitler, says Hitler is listed as a homosexual in Viennese police records The Pink Swastika by Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams.

    Hitler was a sexual deviant who would do anything to hide his sexual proclivities from the public. This made him a puppet to any foreign country or ideology with the knowledge on him. This is known as “the wood” on a person and anyone with ‘the wood’ has control over that person. .
    …..Hans Mend: “In 1915 we were billeted in a brewery and slept in the hay. Hitler was bedded down at night with Schmidtl, his male whore. We heard a rustling in the hay. Then someone switched on his electric flashlight and growled ‘look at those two faggots’…..
    Many of the highest-placed leaders in the Nazi party, including Hitler, Roehm, Forster, von Schirach and almost all of his bodyguards were gay.
    Hitler surrounded himself with homosexuals and even retrieved Roehm from Bolivia, making him Deputy Fuhrer. This knowledge enabled outside countries like Britain and ideologies like the Freemasons lo control Hitler, his high command and his bodyguards. Hitler and his band of merry bandits became puppets with wooden strings. In this way, any foreign society can be destroyed with a leader hiding their sexuality. Hitler, Roehm, Forster and von Schirach took part in destroying their own societies while enjoying the power it gave them. Hitler was a double agent prime minister. He worked for a foreign country (Britain) and a foreign ideology (the Freemasons). The formula proved so effective it is still used today, in politics and the media, especially with TV personalities, radio announcers, prime ministers and presidents, both male and female. Hitler was a British Agent by Greg Hallett p.65 http://whale.to/b/myth1.html

    Don’t that turn the Jewish homo apple cart into rancid vinegar.

    Now why do you suppose the Hollywood gang that simply can’t restrain itself from producing anti-Hitler movies hasn’t drilled right in on Hitler the Homo? Why no, “I was Hitler’s Butch.” Can’t you just picture BOLD Red swastika banners rendered through the ubiquitous rainbow filter? It would be a HUGE hit at PR agencies from DC to New York. Liberals would climb all over each other to be the first to embrace the Rainbow Swastika, maybe create a huge new meme, maybe immortalize your PR firm: WE Brought Hitler Out of the Closet, YES WE DID!

    Because that would give the game away; it would spill the beans; it would pull the curtain back and allow the ROW to see just who is “manipulating the wood” and how the time-honored method of debauching an individual, or an entire society, is done, the better to gain dominance and control over that puppet, person or polity.

    Read More
  35. @reuphen
    Don't forget the Hindoos...

    reuphen

    This past Saturday…SNL…Native Born White Americans are taunted on national TV by the spoiled arrogant son of two Indian Legal Immigrants…father a gastro specialist. There was-is 0 economic case for importing Indian Legal Immigrants…they are a hostile Asian Fifth Column that POTUS Trump is very found of. Paul Kersey twitter should be very careful about who he worships….

    And don’t forget Aziz Pai…seriously F….Trump…and after the his first War Crime in collusion with the Saudis in Yemen yesterday.

    I make no distinction between the Syosset Diner robbery and Trump’s pick for the FCC…

    Read More
    • Replies: @grapesoda
    F--- Aziz Ansari. He is culturally Muslim so it's no wonder he hates Trump. I used to think he was funny but stopped watching his show when he started whining about how there are not more East Indians represented on American television. MAYBE BECAUSE THEY'RE ONLY 2% OF THE POPULATION DIPSHIT? Why aren't Swedish more represented in Thai movies? Why aren't Colombians more represented in Siberian television. Ansari has gone full SJW. And SJWs only care about using the lofty Western principle of equality for their own ends. They of course do not care about actual equality or proportional representation.

    grapesoda - Blog commenter, Kiwanis Club member, and trumpet player

  36. @Truth
    This was 35 years ago, Chief, people have been dying, killing, and raping each other since Cain and Abel.

    Yes, but that incident was particularly brutal and grotesque. Do you make a habit of joking about murder and rape? Especially such egregious examples. (yes, some of the date “rape” lunacy can be funny, and Michael Brown gave cause to be shot blatantly enough I can see making jokes about that, though I probably would not, and that was not murder as well)

    It would serve you well to remember that even though 35 years is a long time it falls well within many people’s lifetimes. Any thoughts on how you would feel if someone who lost a family member in that incident came across your “joke”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I'm sorry if you are offended my friend...

    ...Do you make a habit of joking about murder and rape?... (yes, some of the date “rape” lunacy can be funny, and Michael Brown gave cause to be shot blatantly enough I can see making jokes about that...
     
    ...but one would assume, from your own comments, that it is not jokes about"murder and rape" that you find egregious, but jokes about THIS murder and rape, and particularly because it involves; 1. white victims, 2. black offenders; no other reason.

    Here's a gift; offensive or funny?

    http://www.yuksrus.com/celebs_jeffery_dahmer.html

    http://media.photobucket.com/user/thingsandwhatnot/media/True%20Crime/For%20the%20Lulz/tumblr_m6cdk88cow1qator8o6_400.jpg.html?filters[term]=ted bundy victims serial killer&filters[primary]=images&filters[secondary]=videos&sort=1&o=22

  37. I, too, thought that the rendition of The Star-Spangled Banner was weak – and I, too, thought when it was over, “At least she sang it is it’s written.”
    Agree 100%, that song needs a powerful voice to do it justice.

    Read More
  38. The spectre of automation and artificial intelligence is, to my mind, vastly overblown – my mind being shaped by more than 50 years in the computer business.

    Things change, constantly and unexpectedly. If something changes the automated machinery has to be reprogrammed and its operational steps refined by extensive testing. This makes sense for large production runs or very standardized products like machine screws. But, the operation has no flexibility. It becomes difficult to respond to consumer tastes or changing demand or changing suppliers.

    I don’t think it’s going to have anywhere near the impact predicted by its proponents.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

    The spectre of automation and artificial intelligence is, to my mind, vastly overblown...

    I don’t think it’s going to have anywhere near the impact predicted by its proponents.
     

    Agreed.

    I suspect this subject has been boosted lately in an attempt to distract from the real threat of cheap foreign labor -- the theory being that if you can get the American people to worry about automation and AI stealing their livelihoods, then they will stop supporting Trumpian controls on immigration, outsourcing and importing.

    Automation has been trotted out as a boogeyman for almost a century, but it has never destroyed American lives and communities the way imported labor and exported production have.

  39. @Truth

    White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point…and have sex with other couples…and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.
     
    Oh, so the black folks saved the white folks a few hours of small-talk, and a couple of hundred bucks in liquor and drugs?

    [Spewing forth endless numbers of short, content-free insults is not good behavior. If all your future comments were trashed, the discussion would lose nothing and no other commenter would even notice your permanent disappearance.]

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    1. Whom did I insult? (this time at least).

    2. You do read the responses (by white commenters, one would assume) to your own posts, don't you? Because, I haven't been taking stats, but most would appear to be negative.

  40. @Roy Lofquist
    The spectre of automation and artificial intelligence is, to my mind, vastly overblown - my mind being shaped by more than 50 years in the computer business.

    Things change, constantly and unexpectedly. If something changes the automated machinery has to be reprogrammed and its operational steps refined by extensive testing. This makes sense for large production runs or very standardized products like machine screws. But, the operation has no flexibility. It becomes difficult to respond to consumer tastes or changing demand or changing suppliers.

    I don't think it's going to have anywhere near the impact predicted by its proponents.

    The spectre of automation and artificial intelligence is, to my mind, vastly overblown…

    I don’t think it’s going to have anywhere near the impact predicted by its proponents.

    Agreed.

    I suspect this subject has been boosted lately in an attempt to distract from the real threat of cheap foreign labor — the theory being that if you can get the American people to worry about automation and AI stealing their livelihoods, then they will stop supporting Trumpian controls on immigration, outsourcing and importing.

    Automation has been trotted out as a boogeyman for almost a century, but it has never destroyed American lives and communities the way imported labor and exported production have.

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @anon
    Won't automated and robotic manufacture run the risk of over-production? Has that all been worked out. The up-front investment is high. Automation CAN produce 200X, and needs to produce and sell 150X to break even but if it takes only 10X skilled workers to monitor the machines, who is going to have the income to buy all of the product?

    iirc, Japan trashes enough new computers, parts, etc. to build causeways and barrier islands (heh -- maybe they can use excess production to build a sea wall around Fukushima fallout).
    , @grapesoda
    Yep, I work in a minor part of the industry too and it does seem overblown. Basically, humans do the anomalous work, computers do the routine work, and so it shall remain for quite some time.

    The devil is in the details. Saying "automation" is catnip to bloggers because it makes them sound smart and "forward thinking," and it stimulates a lot of theoretical discussion by people who don't work in the industry and don't know much of the details.
  41. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Buzz Mohawk

    The spectre of automation and artificial intelligence is, to my mind, vastly overblown...

    I don’t think it’s going to have anywhere near the impact predicted by its proponents.
     

    Agreed.

    I suspect this subject has been boosted lately in an attempt to distract from the real threat of cheap foreign labor -- the theory being that if you can get the American people to worry about automation and AI stealing their livelihoods, then they will stop supporting Trumpian controls on immigration, outsourcing and importing.

    Automation has been trotted out as a boogeyman for almost a century, but it has never destroyed American lives and communities the way imported labor and exported production have.

    Won’t automated and robotic manufacture run the risk of over-production? Has that all been worked out. The up-front investment is high. Automation CAN produce 200X, and needs to produce and sell 150X to break even but if it takes only 10X skilled workers to monitor the machines, who is going to have the income to buy all of the product?

    iirc, Japan trashes enough new computers, parts, etc. to build causeways and barrier islands (heh — maybe they can use excess production to build a sea wall around Fukushima fallout).

    Read More
  42. The Voldemort Vulture – Jared Kushner – is always standing over daddy in every White House picture. It’s creepy.

    Daddy had better not get out of line with the Jews.

    Art

    p.s. Looks like he is kicking some of the white Christians out of his White House love nest.

    Read More
  43. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    When so many Jews hate Trump, why did some Jews like Stephen Miller jump on the Trump bandwagon? What did they see that anti-Trump Jews didn’t see?

    Does it have something to do with the Alt Right? Alt Right movement is too fringe and under-funded to have had any direct influence on the election. But maybe it had an indirect influence on the election. Maybe some Jews like Miller saw the rise of Alt Right as portent of things to come… unless something is done to forestall the dire future.

    Alt Right may be fringe and vanguard-driven, but it has the potential the populist voice of the white working class and lower-middle class if it were to de-emphasize all that highfalutin neo-Nietzschean ubermensch stuff.
    Why? Globalism is elitist and favors the urban rich over everyone else. When the power and wealth are all sucked into the cities, the reaction will be populism. Since many cities are controlled by Jewish globalist elites, there is less unity and solidarity between city and countryside than ever before. FDR was an urban elitist, but he felt some send of bond with gentile whites all across America. Jewish elites tend to see non-elite whites as less-evolved deplorables. Their idea is to keep them down.
    Now, if Jews ranged from very rich to very poor, Jews might feel more sympathy for the down-and-out. But as the great majority of Jews range from successful to super-rich and are concentrated in urban areas, Jews feel zero connection to those outside the big cities. Because of broad-based Jewish success, Jewish identity has become ethno-economic. There are few poor Jews. And even poorer Jews, like some Orthodox types, have enough culture and good sense to lead rather sane lives unlike nutty Negroes and trashy tattooed whites.

    Jews once felt a degree of hostility toward cities when Wasp elites held the reins of power or when thick-necked Irish ran the City Machine. But those days are gone. Cities are now economically owned by Jews, and the homo machine is more powerful than any white ethnic machine like that of Irish Catholics. Now, cities are the power-centers of Jewish globalism. Historically, Jews made a decisive shift from Labor politics to Global free trade. Though Jews weren’t heavily represented among the working class, it had been to their moral advantage to side with the workers since most of the industry were owned and run by Wasp elites. So, just like Jews championed blacks to use against whites, they championed the working man against the wasp elites.
    But once Jews took over as the main movers of US economy, they no longer saw the Worker as particularly useful. If anything, Big Labor was an hindrance for Jews to make more money. (Once Wasp power was made subservient to Jewish power, the Labor issue lost its luster. Why use big labor against wasp elites when the latter now served Jewish power? Besides, once the working class gained ‘middle class’ status in post-war America, it turned ‘conservative’ and voted for Nixon who, at the time, was seen as ‘new hitler’ by many Jews.) And once Jews took over city politics from the stupid-drunken-Irish, they were anxious that people might say, “Look, the Jews got all the power!” So, Jews promoted homo stuff to make it seem homos run everything. It’s like how Ivan the Terrible uses the dim-witted homo son of the boyars.

    [MORE]

    https://youtu.be/XEfDe4fvfFA?t=1h4m26s

    Anyway, with cities growing richer in the globalist era, it seemed Jews were on top of the world. They had everything: Wall Street, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Congress, State Department, and etc. They could write new financial laws, dictate foreign policy, control trade deals, shape the culture(and win every culture war), command the narrative, and destroy other nations.

    Jews were able to loot Russia in the 90s. Jewish casino moguls came to own tons of politicians like nickels and dimes. Hollywood became world culture. Jews led the US into Iraq War. Congress praised Israel no matter what. Wall Street laws were changed so that firms like Goldman Sachs could go from making a killing to making a murder.
    And since Jews controlled the media, they could deflect any blame, and if anything, blame everyone but themselves for all that went wrong….. and indeed, so many Jewish-engineered projects ended terribly.

    Russia was turned into a hell hole, and it led to rise of Putin and autocracy. While most Jews railed at Putin at ‘new hitler’, some Jews were more reflective and thought, “if we Jews act like total pigs, what happened in Russia can happen here.”
    The Iraq War based on neocon fantasies led to a total mess, and this mess would spread eventually all over Middle East.
    Financial deregulation, combined with cynical egalitarianism, led to crazy housing boom and financial meltdown. It led to the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression.
    And the state of our culture isn’t healthy today. And as fish rots from the head, the cultural decay has spread all over America, resulting in White Death and degeneracy.

    Most Jews figure, “We have it so good, we got the power and privilege, and we rule the cities.” So, why should they care about anything? Also, as long as the GOP portrayed itself as the party of ‘free trade’ and ‘individual liberty’, the Jewish Democrats could stick to the old formula of ‘Democrats for the people’ and ‘Republicans for the plutocrats’ EVEN THOUGH it was the Jewish Democrats and their allies who were the richest and most privileged people in America. This was why Romney failed to rally the working class and lower-middle class in 2012. Until Trump came along, Jewish Democrats had the best of everything. They had the most money and power, but they also had the symbolism of People Power since the GOP was so slavish to Wall Street(even as Wall Street came to favor Obama in 2008 and even as 2/3 of the super-rich supported the Democrats). Trump’s ‘genius’ was in seeing this contradiction and playing the People Card to expose the Democrats as the party of the globalist hogs.

    But rise of Alt Right was maybe seen by some Jews as sign of things to come. As a nascent movement led by young people, Alt Right hasn’t the money, organization, experience, and clout to make anything happen on its own.
    BUT, its themes have meme-potential because more and more people are getting ‘red-pilled’ by reality or by alternative news made possible by internet. Also, all this PC self-censorship in media and academia has made Alt Right the most honest voice. There are too many contradictions in the current system, and too many people are losing out. These ‘losers’ and ‘deplorables’ don’t have institutional power, but they still have the power of numbers. So, if Alt Right ideology were to spread to their communities, something can happen.
    A box of matches is a small insignificant-looking object, but a single match can start a forest fire after a long dry spell when there’s a lot of dry woods and leaves. And globalism turned much of America into an economic drought, and all those ‘deplorable’ woods and leaves can be set afire. So many people are beginning to wonder what went wrong, but they get nothing resembling the truth from MSM or Conservatism Inc.
    If Alt Right stuck to boilerplate GOP mantra., it’d be preaching the same ‘muh liberty’, which would have little meaning to the white masses.
    If Alt Right were like tardo neo-Nazis, it’d be making fools of itself as Hollywood Nazi clowns.

    But Alt Right made some compelling arguments about WHO has the power and how globalism, in terms of trade & immigration policy, is hurting America, esp white America.
    For now, Alt Right is powerless. But it has the potential to influence many people.

    So, maybe Jews like Miller figured that the best way to forestall the Alt Right movement was to support a Civic Nationalist like Donald Trump who is very pro-Zionist and surrounded by Jews. With Trump at the helm, white masses might feel that they are being heard and grow less angry. That way, the Alt Right message will have less appeal to them since Trump is already doing something for them.

    Elitism says the best-and-brightest and the best-connected should do whatever that maximizes their own power and privilege. Elitism severs the cultural, emotional, social, and political ties between the elites and the masses. Elitism goes well with globalism since the elites see masses just as cattle to hire and fire. Only the elites matter.
    The positive side of elitism is meritocracy, but there’s no guarantee that those who gain most power and wealth under meritocracy will do things that are good for the people of the nation. Their main priority might just be enriching themselves.
    Also, there is no guarantee that the smartest and most qualified will play by the rules. Most people in Wall Street are very smart and got there through real ability. But so many have no scruples and no accountability. If MARGIN CALL is to be believed, ability isn’t the same thing as accountability. It could mean smart people using their smarts to cheat more. That sure was the case in Russia in the 90s. So, talent isn’t enough. There has to be a formula of talent and integrity and community.

    Populism, in contrast to elitism, speaks of the people and to the people. It calls for policies that favor the common man, the forgotten man. Populism says that politicians and those in power should heed the interests of the masses. People’s concerns must always be taken into account when the rich and powerful make decisions.
    The negative side of populism is demagoguery. Because the masses tend to be ill-educated and rather ignorant, the demagogue can play to their fears, prejudices, and paranoia — and Trump did some of this. Also, just because the elites are sometimes very wrong and the common man has it right, it doesn’t mean that ‘common sense’ always trumps expertise. The worst kind of populist mania was seen in the Cultural Revolution where the mantra was ‘red over expert’. Even Red Guard quacks were favored over doctors with real experience.

    The meeting point of elitism and populism is nationalism. Via nationalism, the system can have a leadership class with expertise and experience. And since the theme of nationalism is ‘one for all and all for one’, the elites must not lead and rule simply on the basis of elitism that priorities only the interests of the elites. Globalism encourages the elites to identify mainly with elites of other nations and to favor foreign masses for (cheap) labor over what used to be known as ‘fellow countrymen’.
    Nationalism is where the left meets the right. It was the political product of the French Revolution that declared that the national leaders must represent the national masses.

    There are two concepts of three concepts of justice:

    1. Redress for a wrong. So, if someone stole from you, you must be made to give back what you stole or face punishment for the crime.

    2. Collective grievance. It is a macro-variation of 1. It argues that since an entire people were wronged, the wrong must be redressed on a collective level.

    3. Shared identity and interests. This concept of justice isn’t about specific wrongs or any wrong done to someone. It is not reactive to a certain crime committed individually or historically.
    Rather, it is about the formula for the future. It is a vision that a people must move forward together. It call for strategies that best secure the well-being of all people even if it means extra weight for the best-and-brightest. For example, the best-and-brightest might be able to do most and make the biggest gains the fastest under globalism where they can access the cheapest labor and best brains from all over the world. But in doing so, they hurt the chances of national workers and national talent pool.
    This idea of justice might have originated with the Jews who, for a long time, emphasized tribal unity over royal privileges. Most pagan cultures had kings and nobles lording over others who were just seen as subject. But since the Jewish Covenant made even the lowest Jew with slit pud a precious child of God and blood descendant of Abraham, every Jew was seen as part of a big extended family. So, it wasn’t enough for Jews to succeed as individuals. They had to think in terms of what is good for the Tribe. This concept of justice later morphed into Christianity where all of humanity was seen as one tribe of God. And then it later turned to communism that stressed that economics should ensure that all workers have a good and just life. A saner variation of this was Social-Democracy, New Deal, and National Socialism(if we remove the toxic radical racist ideology).
    Paradoxically, this unselfish view that may have originated among Jews — it’s like Moses has to be mindful to do the things that are good for all Jews, not only for himself — could lead to extreme ethnic selfishness. So, while Jews among themselves must be mindful of one another and share — Israel was founded by socialists — , their narrow sense of tribal identity means Jews can exploit non-Jews. The worst example of this was in the 1990s when American Jews, European Jews, and Russian Jews all acted in concert to help one another while Russians fell into deep poverty, and by some estimates, 10 million died premature deaths. Ethno-centrism is fine if it’s about one nation favoring itself over other nations. So, if Germans were to favor German identity/interests or if Japanese were to favor Japanese identity/interests, it’s no big problem. Other nations, in turn, can guard their own interests. But ethno-centrism in a diverse nation can be problematic, especially if it’s the powerful ethnocentrism of a minority group. When the US was 90% white gentile, its favoring of white ethno-interests wasn’t fair to blacks and others. But it still served most people well. And when Civil Rights Movement happened, the US dedicated itself to serving ALL Americans. But when the US is ruled by Jews who are 2% of the population who are mainly allied to homos, another minority group, elite-ethno-centrism turns into narrowest kind of heartless greed.

    Perhaps, the Jews around Trump are seeing the danger signs of this. Unless there is a new formula that makes all Americans feel as ‘fellow countrymen’, the Alt Right meme-matches have the potential of setting off a forest fire one day.

    But who knows what is really going on in people’s minds.
    The film SNOWDEN — I have no idea how accurate it is — offers a glimpse into what might be called the Deep Media of the Deep State. For us hoi polloi, there is only the mainstream media that give us official propaganda and the alternative media that speculates(without smoking gun proof since they don’t have the means to probe into things). In contrast, NSA and CIA are like deep media that collects secret and insider information and shares those secrets ONLY with insiders. It is hardcore truth for insiders only. The real truth is hidden since 90% of what people say in public are lies. So, only the deep media knows the real truth. And since deep media got its information illegally(at least by conventional standards since what is legal for deep state would be illegal for the rest of us), it cannot be shared publicly.
    And access to this information doesn’t necessarily include politicians and even the president since the deep state has the power to withhold information from even those it is supposed to serve.
    And unless we have access to the deep media, we don’t know what is really happening.
    Today, the deep media know more than ever before since digital technology enables such easy spying on just about anything.
    For the masses, there is mainstream media that are mostly useless.
    For the academics, there is scholarly media that are more knowledgeable. While scholarly discourse can be accessed by fellow scholars and even ordinary people, much of it happens in the exclusive halls of academe. Also, even though some scholars are connected to government and have access to deep media, many don’t. Their knowledge is limited to their level of access. Historians usually have to wait many years before the archives are opened up. But even then, many key documents were destroyed by the deep state.

    In contrast, there are some within the deep state with access to the most private information. So, this deep media serves only the super-insiders. And these people surely kept tabs on Miller, Trump, and etc. If anyone can blackmail anyone, it is not the Russians. It is those in the US deep state that has best technology to spy on anyone. (One wonders if the reason why Merkel is so slavish to the US is because the US deep state has recordings of her saying insensitive things about, say, Jewish power?)

    Snowden had access to deep media and decided to play the role of prometheus by sharing it with the people. I never got the impression that Snowden is a Trump supporter. And he is no Putin-supporter and ended up in Russia accidentally cuz his Visa was revoked. But there is a Russian-connection in the sense that what happened in Russia proved to be a harbinger for what happened in the US. Though Trump is far from Putin, both came to power due to excessive globalism that was dismissive of the interests of the national masses. In the case of Putin, a deep state operative steeped in KGB dirty tricks, headed the new national front. It was Putin against the oligarchs. Putin could play gangster against gangsters because he knew the ins-and-outs of power, like Stalin did.
    In the case of Trump, it is a NY oligarch who presented himself as the champion of the people against the deep state. But then, some like Linh Dinh say Trump is really a tool of the deep state. But then, there are surely various factions in the deep state. A kind of hidden silent civil war within the deep state?
    Putin’s style is more like Michael Corleone, Trump’s is more like Tony Montana.

    Snowden’s revelations about the deep state was instructive because it showed that if we dig deeper into the sources of power, we see that both parties are joined at the hip. They look like two separate trees but are actually one tree beneath the ground joined to the same roots.
    The Trumpian narrative was that he was opposed by both parties beholden to the deep state. Therefore, it’s not enough to chop down the rotten trees but dig out the evil roots from which both trees grew. Or drain the swamp. It’s not enough to pick up the flotsam floating on top.
    But according to Linh Dinh, Trump was aided by the deep state against the two parties. This may seem counter-intuitive since so many people in the intelligence community stood with Hillary and denounced Trump. But maybe there is a deeper state within deep state.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23
    A good commentary, tribal /racial patronage is very dangerous in a multicultural society , in fact the most destructive activity of all and US Jews have been heavily involved in it since the 1930's to gain key power positions in industry and government (e.g. Summers & Kagan as just two current examples).

    That leads on to another point. Given that US Jewry is only 2% of the population, it is entirely dependent on network power functioning through existing laws and institutions, so they have a big interest in supporting the legal framework and institutional power (manipulate it but don't break it).

    If the structure of society should break down like in revolutionary France or Russia the 1% (the aristocracy) lose their shield and are at great risk in the resulting chaos. The exception of course would be if the Jews themselves foment and lead the revolution, as they did in Russia in October 1917 (in this case they were the ones liquidating the old aristocracy to replace it with a new one - their own - taking over vacant aristocratic homes, adopting Pushkin evenings, elite schools, weekend dachas etc.).
  44. @jacques sheete

    “A nation exists to serve its citizens.” ...“It is the right of all nations to put their own interests first.” Of course it is! Why did that even need saying?
     
    It needs saying because myths typically need reinforcing. High priests of one sort or another have historically been pretty good at it for some (wink, wink!) reason.

    You would have been closer to the truth had you written,


    A nation should exist to serve its citizens.
     
    But even then, it would only be the expression of some Utopian ideal as unobtainable as it is attractive, because who can define what the "national interest is" especially in a very populous nation? Just look at Israel for example. Even in that relatively small nation there never was any consensus on what constitutes the "national interest."

    Nationalist sentimentalists need to bone up on the results of the Age of Nationalism, which are generally pretty similar to the results of the Age(s) of Empire, but I'd advise avoiding the Great Course series for insights into those histories. It's my impression that those courses offer the usual misleading, hagiographic, pabulum and mythology, meant for mass consumption.

    Anyway, nations, as we're discussing them today, are nothing more than somewhat efficient wealth transfer agencies and what shouldn't need describing or explaining are the facts about how and where that stuff flows.

    Most people today sneer at the concept of tribalism, but nationalism is tribalism on steroids.

    Most people today sneer at the concept of tribalism, but nationalism is tribalism on steroids.

    Who are these “most people’? The entire Left is made up of people whose first and only impulse is tribalism. The only tribalism they sneer at is other peoples tribalism, not their own.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    The only tribalism they sneer at is other peoples tribalism, not their own.
     
    True. But that pretty much applies to all nationalists. In fact, it seems to be a human trait to recognize everyone else's faults but to be completely blind to one's own.
  45. WHICITA

    KNOXVILLE

    SYOSSET DINER GANG RAPE

    CONNIE FRANCIS WESTBURY MUSIC FAIR…

    LOUIS TILL….

    EMITT TILL DESERVED WHAT HE GOT!!!

    DON’T WHISTLE AT WHITE WOMEN….AND THAT’S THE MEMO!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Oh, hey, 6 events, and you're going back 90 years to find them, good for you, Sport...

    (Of course %85 of all whites are killed by whites.)
  46. @Authenticjazzman
    [Spewing forth endless numbers of short, content-free insults is not good behavior. If all your future comments were trashed, the discussion would lose nothing and no other commenter would even notice your permanent disappearance.]

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    1. Whom did I insult? (this time at least).

    2. You do read the responses (by white commenters, one would assume) to your own posts, don’t you? Because, I haven’t been taking stats, but most would appear to be negative.

    Read More
  47. @res
    Yes, but that incident was particularly brutal and grotesque. Do you make a habit of joking about murder and rape? Especially such egregious examples. (yes, some of the date "rape" lunacy can be funny, and Michael Brown gave cause to be shot blatantly enough I can see making jokes about that, though I probably would not, and that was not murder as well)

    It would serve you well to remember that even though 35 years is a long time it falls well within many people's lifetimes. Any thoughts on how you would feel if someone who lost a family member in that incident came across your "joke"?

    I’m sorry if you are offended my friend…

    …Do you make a habit of joking about murder and rape?… (yes, some of the date “rape” lunacy can be funny, and Michael Brown gave cause to be shot blatantly enough I can see making jokes about that…

    …but one would assume, from your own comments, that it is not jokes about”murder and rape” that you find egregious, but jokes about THIS murder and rape, and particularly because it involves; 1. white victims, 2. black offenders; no other reason.

    Here’s a gift; offensive or funny?

    http://www.yuksrus.com/celebs_jeffery_dahmer.html

    http://media.photobucket.com/user/thingsandwhatnot/media/True%20Crime/For%20the%20Lulz/tumblr_m6cdk88cow1qator8o6_400.jpg.html?filters[term]=ted bundy victims serial killer&filters[primary]=images&filters[secondary]=videos&sort=1&o=22

    Read More
    • Replies: @res

    I’m sorry if you are offended my friend…
     
    If the things you post here are a fair indication of your personality I'm not sure I have any interest in being your "friend."

    but jokes about THIS murder and rape, and particularly because it involves; 1. white victims, 2. black offenders
     
    No. The things that bother me:
    1. The brutality of the crimes.
    2. That you were making fun of the victims not the criminals as in your first link.

    If you really can't get that from my comments you are dumber than I believe (from yours) so please stop imputing false beliefs to me.

    Only looked at your first link since the second is broken and it felt like a waste of time to sort out.
  48. Poor Trump – he has Chucky Israel in one ear and Jared The Vulture in the other.

    It’s a wonder he is doing, what he is!

    In spite of those two Zionist Jew Zombies – he has decided not to blow up the world and give Palestine to Israel – good on him.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
    @Art

    In spite of those two Zionist Jew Zombies – he has decided not to blow up the world and give Palestine to Israel – good on him.
     
    How do you figure?

    1. He has settled on a virulent pro-settler ambassador to Israel
    2. He has blocked Obama's last-minute aid to the Palestinians
    3. He is vocally anti-Iran - which is a threat to Israel (dubious) but not to us
    4. He says he will move our embassy to Jerusalem - defying international law
    5. He has invited Bibi to the WH in February - no indication of such an invitation to Abbas
    6. He has voiced no objection to Israel announcing 2500 new constructions in the OT
    7. His cabinet is full of anti-Iran, pro-Israel individuals
    8. His closest advisors are zio-sympathizers

    Maybe this is all tactics to set the stage for some really clever deal-making that I am not smart enough to comprehend, but I remain skeptical.

    But, I am completely in his camp for all the other actions he is taking. I just don't think getting in bed with Israel and Israel-firsters is a wise move. If you lie down with vipers...
  49. @Greenstalk

    The way automation is progressing, all those factories that were shipped abroad will be repatriated to the U.S.A. just in time for their workers to be totally replaced by robots.
     
    That's largely a question of government policy. American workers can be divided into those with protected jobs, and those without them. What makes an occupation protected is not, for the most part, the immense skill and brain-power it takes to carry it out. There's no inherent economic reason why the highly credentialed are given generous protection from the forces of international competition which everyone else has to deal with - they are simply a politically powerful group who have managed to get the laws made so as to protect themselves and leave everyone else exposed.

    A very interesting comment.

    A nationalist government — let’s say, N — can make it state policy to encourage some occupations — say, rice farmers — even against the dogma of “free trade”. Rice farmers are the ultimate security blanket against an adversary starving her population in a war by cutting of a hypothetical “more economical” supply of cheap Burmese/Vietnamese/etc. rice. Rice farmers are also important culturally, a living link to ancient N and thus worth keeping.

    China had monopolies on silk, porcelain (Kao Lin), and tea for centuries. Not much “free trade” by the Celestial Empire then.

    Read More
  50. @woodNfish

    If some Jews can concoct a style that remolds skinhead neo-nazi antics into expression of Jewish power, I suppose even ‘America First’ can be co-opted and remolded.
     
    Jews have never had a problem with nazis - that is the BIG LIE. In fact, there is no difference between leftist jews and fascists, they are the same! The nazis, like all fascists, were socialists (National Socialist German Worker's Party). The problem for jews was that in condemning nazis for the "holocaust", they knew they were in danger of also condemning their preferred method of wielding power, so they had to devise a method to deflect insight into that truth. Their solution was to claim that fascists are far-right. It is a lie. It has always been a lie, and it is still a lie today. Most jews are fascists and that is why they loved the head plantation nigger, obama.

    Very well said – I couldn’t agree more. In this postmodernist world, traditional words have no meaning as they can describe opposing connotations. We have seen Trotskyites transform into neoliberals and neocons – they are even the same individuals donning different mantles but with the same nefarious intent.

    Read More
  51. @Art
    Poor Trump - he has Chucky Israel in one ear and Jared The Vulture in the other.

    It's a wonder he is doing, what he is!

    In spite of those two Zionist Jew Zombies - he has decided not to blow up the world and give Palestine to Israel - good on him.

    Peace --- Art

    In spite of those two Zionist Jew Zombies – he has decided not to blow up the world and give Palestine to Israel – good on him.

    How do you figure?

    1. He has settled on a virulent pro-settler ambassador to Israel
    2. He has blocked Obama’s last-minute aid to the Palestinians
    3. He is vocally anti-Iran – which is a threat to Israel (dubious) but not to us
    4. He says he will move our embassy to Jerusalem – defying international law
    5. He has invited Bibi to the WH in February – no indication of such an invitation to Abbas
    6. He has voiced no objection to Israel announcing 2500 new constructions in the OT
    7. His cabinet is full of anti-Iran, pro-Israel individuals
    8. His closest advisors are zio-sympathizers

    Maybe this is all tactics to set the stage for some really clever deal-making that I am not smart enough to comprehend, but I remain skeptical.

    But, I am completely in his camp for all the other actions he is taking. I just don’t think getting in bed with Israel and Israel-firsters is a wise move. If you lie down with vipers…

    Read More
  52. @War for Blair Mountain
    WHICITA


    KNOXVILLE



    SYOSSET DINER GANG RAPE



    CONNIE FRANCIS WESTBURY MUSIC FAIR...


    LOUIS TILL....



    EMITT TILL DESERVED WHAT HE GOT!!!


    DON'T WHISTLE AT WHITE WOMEN....AND THAT'S THE MEMO!!!

    Oh, hey, 6 events, and you’re going back 90 years to find them, good for you, Sport…

    (Of course %85 of all whites are killed by whites.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Perhaps you missed your calling during the Kenyan Foriegner years as standup comic taunting the White Female gang rape victims in the Syosset Diner robbery...Perhaps you could have had a promising career in the David Dinkins Administration?...Your a barrel of laughs!!!...If only my late cousin could be alive today to appreciate your whacky sense of humor!!! You should be America's first comic laureate....
  53. @Buzz Mohawk
    God that's a beautiful photograph.

    Melania’s such a contrast to the baboon that Obama is married to.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    ...Other than their shared "y" chromosome.
    , @anon
    She is easy on the eyes; so are the rest of the Trump women. Tho Melania looked stiff most of the time, surprising for someone accustomed to being at the side of such a public figure.

    otoh, most of the rest of female grandstand sitters -- the Main Attractions and especially the wives of Main Attractions-- should have stayed home. They looked like they'd never worn anything other than rump-sprung sweatpants.

    except for Paul Ryan's wife; she has a pleasing appearance and presence.
  54. @Truth

    White husbands and White Wives for forced to strip naked at gun point…and have sex with other couples…and then the wives were raped in front of their husbands.
     
    Oh, so the black folks saved the white folks a few hours of small-talk, and a couple of hundred bucks in liquor and drugs?

    At least they didn’t eat them so there’s that. I guess two hundred years in America has had somewhat of a civilizing effect on your species.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Yeah, they should have mentored these guys...

    http://reallifeishorror.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-ripper-crew.html
  55. @Johnny Smoggins
    Melania's such a contrast to the baboon that Obama is married to.

    …Other than their shared “y” chromosome.

    Read More
  56. @Johnny Smoggins
    At least they didn't eat them so there's that. I guess two hundred years in America has had somewhat of a civilizing effect on your species.

    Yeah, they should have mentored these guys…

    http://reallifeishorror.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-ripper-crew.html

    Read More
  57. @Cloak And Dagger
    @Art

    In spite of those two Zionist Jew Zombies – he has decided not to blow up the world and give Palestine to Israel – good on him.
     
    How do you figure?

    1. He has settled on a virulent pro-settler ambassador to Israel
    2. He has blocked Obama's last-minute aid to the Palestinians
    3. He is vocally anti-Iran - which is a threat to Israel (dubious) but not to us
    4. He says he will move our embassy to Jerusalem - defying international law
    5. He has invited Bibi to the WH in February - no indication of such an invitation to Abbas
    6. He has voiced no objection to Israel announcing 2500 new constructions in the OT
    7. His cabinet is full of anti-Iran, pro-Israel individuals
    8. His closest advisors are zio-sympathizers

    Maybe this is all tactics to set the stage for some really clever deal-making that I am not smart enough to comprehend, but I remain skeptical.

    But, I am completely in his camp for all the other actions he is taking. I just don't think getting in bed with Israel and Israel-firsters is a wise move. If you lie down with vipers...

    Kushner said all that was kosher.

    Read More
  58. @Buzz Mohawk

    The spectre of automation and artificial intelligence is, to my mind, vastly overblown...

    I don’t think it’s going to have anywhere near the impact predicted by its proponents.
     

    Agreed.

    I suspect this subject has been boosted lately in an attempt to distract from the real threat of cheap foreign labor -- the theory being that if you can get the American people to worry about automation and AI stealing their livelihoods, then they will stop supporting Trumpian controls on immigration, outsourcing and importing.

    Automation has been trotted out as a boogeyman for almost a century, but it has never destroyed American lives and communities the way imported labor and exported production have.

    Yep, I work in a minor part of the industry too and it does seem overblown. Basically, humans do the anomalous work, computers do the routine work, and so it shall remain for quite some time.

    The devil is in the details. Saying “automation” is catnip to bloggers because it makes them sound smart and “forward thinking,” and it stimulates a lot of theoretical discussion by people who don’t work in the industry and don’t know much of the details.

    Read More
  59. @War for Blair Mountain
    reuphen

    This past Saturday...SNL...Native Born White Americans are taunted on national TV by the spoiled arrogant son of two Indian Legal Immigrants...father a gastro specialist. There was-is 0 economic case for importing Indian Legal Immigrants...they are a hostile Asian Fifth Column that POTUS Trump is very found of. Paul Kersey twitter should be very careful about who he worships....

    And don't forget Aziz Pai...seriously F....Trump...and after the his first War Crime in collusion with the Saudis in Yemen yesterday.

    I make no distinction between the Syosset Diner robbery and Trump's pick for the FCC...

    F— Aziz Ansari. He is culturally Muslim so it’s no wonder he hates Trump. I used to think he was funny but stopped watching his show when he started whining about how there are not more East Indians represented on American television. MAYBE BECAUSE THEY’RE ONLY 2% OF THE POPULATION DIPSHIT? Why aren’t Swedish more represented in Thai movies? Why aren’t Colombians more represented in Siberian television. Ansari has gone full SJW. And SJWs only care about using the lofty Western principle of equality for their own ends. They of course do not care about actual equality or proportional representation.

    grapesoda – Blog commenter, Kiwanis Club member, and trumpet player

    Read More
  60. @Truth
    Oh, hey, 6 events, and you're going back 90 years to find them, good for you, Sport...

    (Of course %85 of all whites are killed by whites.)

    Perhaps you missed your calling during the Kenyan Foriegner years as standup comic taunting the White Female gang rape victims in the Syosset Diner robbery…Perhaps you could have had a promising career in the David Dinkins Administration?…Your a barrel of laughs!!!…If only my late cousin could be alive today to appreciate your whacky sense of humor!!! You should be America’s first comic laureate….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Nobody was killed during this event and again, I've mentioned Ted Bundy, Dahmer, and the Ripper Crew, which happened roughly at the same time, they raped, ATE, AND KILLED white people (including women).

    Why don't you care?
  61. @jacques sheete

    “A nation exists to serve its citizens.” ...“It is the right of all nations to put their own interests first.” Of course it is! Why did that even need saying?
     
    It needs saying because myths typically need reinforcing. High priests of one sort or another have historically been pretty good at it for some (wink, wink!) reason.

    You would have been closer to the truth had you written,


    A nation should exist to serve its citizens.
     
    But even then, it would only be the expression of some Utopian ideal as unobtainable as it is attractive, because who can define what the "national interest is" especially in a very populous nation? Just look at Israel for example. Even in that relatively small nation there never was any consensus on what constitutes the "national interest."

    Nationalist sentimentalists need to bone up on the results of the Age of Nationalism, which are generally pretty similar to the results of the Age(s) of Empire, but I'd advise avoiding the Great Course series for insights into those histories. It's my impression that those courses offer the usual misleading, hagiographic, pabulum and mythology, meant for mass consumption.

    Anyway, nations, as we're discussing them today, are nothing more than somewhat efficient wealth transfer agencies and what shouldn't need describing or explaining are the facts about how and where that stuff flows.

    Most people today sneer at the concept of tribalism, but nationalism is tribalism on steroids.

    … because who can define what the “national interest is”

    Isn’t that what parliaments are for?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete


    … because who can define what the “national interest is”

     

    Isn’t that what parliaments are for?
     
    That's what the dreamers believe they're for.
  62. @Greenstalk

    Most people today sneer at the concept of tribalism, but nationalism is tribalism on steroids.
     
    Who are these "most people'? The entire Left is made up of people whose first and only impulse is tribalism. The only tribalism they sneer at is other peoples tribalism, not their own.

    The only tribalism they sneer at is other peoples tribalism, not their own.

    True. But that pretty much applies to all nationalists. In fact, it seems to be a human trait to recognize everyone else’s faults but to be completely blind to one’s own.

    Read More
  63. @geokat62

    ... because who can define what the “national interest is”
     
    Isn't that what parliaments are for?

    … because who can define what the “national interest is”

    Isn’t that what parliaments are for?

    That’s what the dreamers believe they’re for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    Mia culpa. I should have included the qualifier "supposed" -i.e., isn't that what parliaments are supposed to be for?
  64. @Anon
    When so many Jews hate Trump, why did some Jews like Stephen Miller jump on the Trump bandwagon? What did they see that anti-Trump Jews didn't see?

    Does it have something to do with the Alt Right? Alt Right movement is too fringe and under-funded to have had any direct influence on the election. But maybe it had an indirect influence on the election. Maybe some Jews like Miller saw the rise of Alt Right as portent of things to come... unless something is done to forestall the dire future.

    Alt Right may be fringe and vanguard-driven, but it has the potential the populist voice of the white working class and lower-middle class if it were to de-emphasize all that highfalutin neo-Nietzschean ubermensch stuff.
    Why? Globalism is elitist and favors the urban rich over everyone else. When the power and wealth are all sucked into the cities, the reaction will be populism. Since many cities are controlled by Jewish globalist elites, there is less unity and solidarity between city and countryside than ever before. FDR was an urban elitist, but he felt some send of bond with gentile whites all across America. Jewish elites tend to see non-elite whites as less-evolved deplorables. Their idea is to keep them down.
    Now, if Jews ranged from very rich to very poor, Jews might feel more sympathy for the down-and-out. But as the great majority of Jews range from successful to super-rich and are concentrated in urban areas, Jews feel zero connection to those outside the big cities. Because of broad-based Jewish success, Jewish identity has become ethno-economic. There are few poor Jews. And even poorer Jews, like some Orthodox types, have enough culture and good sense to lead rather sane lives unlike nutty Negroes and trashy tattooed whites.

    Jews once felt a degree of hostility toward cities when Wasp elites held the reins of power or when thick-necked Irish ran the City Machine. But those days are gone. Cities are now economically owned by Jews, and the homo machine is more powerful than any white ethnic machine like that of Irish Catholics. Now, cities are the power-centers of Jewish globalism. Historically, Jews made a decisive shift from Labor politics to Global free trade. Though Jews weren't heavily represented among the working class, it had been to their moral advantage to side with the workers since most of the industry were owned and run by Wasp elites. So, just like Jews championed blacks to use against whites, they championed the working man against the wasp elites.
    But once Jews took over as the main movers of US economy, they no longer saw the Worker as particularly useful. If anything, Big Labor was an hindrance for Jews to make more money. (Once Wasp power was made subservient to Jewish power, the Labor issue lost its luster. Why use big labor against wasp elites when the latter now served Jewish power? Besides, once the working class gained 'middle class' status in post-war America, it turned 'conservative' and voted for Nixon who, at the time, was seen as 'new hitler' by many Jews.) And once Jews took over city politics from the stupid-drunken-Irish, they were anxious that people might say, "Look, the Jews got all the power!" So, Jews promoted homo stuff to make it seem homos run everything. It's like how Ivan the Terrible uses the dim-witted homo son of the boyars.

    https://youtu.be/XEfDe4fvfFA?t=1h4m26s

    Anyway, with cities growing richer in the globalist era, it seemed Jews were on top of the world. They had everything: Wall Street, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Congress, State Department, and etc. They could write new financial laws, dictate foreign policy, control trade deals, shape the culture(and win every culture war), command the narrative, and destroy other nations.

    Jews were able to loot Russia in the 90s. Jewish casino moguls came to own tons of politicians like nickels and dimes. Hollywood became world culture. Jews led the US into Iraq War. Congress praised Israel no matter what. Wall Street laws were changed so that firms like Goldman Sachs could go from making a killing to making a murder.
    And since Jews controlled the media, they could deflect any blame, and if anything, blame everyone but themselves for all that went wrong..... and indeed, so many Jewish-engineered projects ended terribly.

    Russia was turned into a hell hole, and it led to rise of Putin and autocracy. While most Jews railed at Putin at 'new hitler', some Jews were more reflective and thought, "if we Jews act like total pigs, what happened in Russia can happen here."
    The Iraq War based on neocon fantasies led to a total mess, and this mess would spread eventually all over Middle East.
    Financial deregulation, combined with cynical egalitarianism, led to crazy housing boom and financial meltdown. It led to the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression.
    And the state of our culture isn't healthy today. And as fish rots from the head, the cultural decay has spread all over America, resulting in White Death and degeneracy.

    Most Jews figure, "We have it so good, we got the power and privilege, and we rule the cities." So, why should they care about anything? Also, as long as the GOP portrayed itself as the party of 'free trade' and 'individual liberty', the Jewish Democrats could stick to the old formula of 'Democrats for the people' and 'Republicans for the plutocrats' EVEN THOUGH it was the Jewish Democrats and their allies who were the richest and most privileged people in America. This was why Romney failed to rally the working class and lower-middle class in 2012. Until Trump came along, Jewish Democrats had the best of everything. They had the most money and power, but they also had the symbolism of People Power since the GOP was so slavish to Wall Street(even as Wall Street came to favor Obama in 2008 and even as 2/3 of the super-rich supported the Democrats). Trump's 'genius' was in seeing this contradiction and playing the People Card to expose the Democrats as the party of the globalist hogs.

    But rise of Alt Right was maybe seen by some Jews as sign of things to come. As a nascent movement led by young people, Alt Right hasn't the money, organization, experience, and clout to make anything happen on its own.
    BUT, its themes have meme-potential because more and more people are getting 'red-pilled' by reality or by alternative news made possible by internet. Also, all this PC self-censorship in media and academia has made Alt Right the most honest voice. There are too many contradictions in the current system, and too many people are losing out. These 'losers' and 'deplorables' don't have institutional power, but they still have the power of numbers. So, if Alt Right ideology were to spread to their communities, something can happen.
    A box of matches is a small insignificant-looking object, but a single match can start a forest fire after a long dry spell when there's a lot of dry woods and leaves. And globalism turned much of America into an economic drought, and all those 'deplorable' woods and leaves can be set afire. So many people are beginning to wonder what went wrong, but they get nothing resembling the truth from MSM or Conservatism Inc.
    If Alt Right stuck to boilerplate GOP mantra., it'd be preaching the same 'muh liberty', which would have little meaning to the white masses.
    If Alt Right were like tardo neo-Nazis, it'd be making fools of itself as Hollywood Nazi clowns.

    But Alt Right made some compelling arguments about WHO has the power and how globalism, in terms of trade & immigration policy, is hurting America, esp white America.
    For now, Alt Right is powerless. But it has the potential to influence many people.

    So, maybe Jews like Miller figured that the best way to forestall the Alt Right movement was to support a Civic Nationalist like Donald Trump who is very pro-Zionist and surrounded by Jews. With Trump at the helm, white masses might feel that they are being heard and grow less angry. That way, the Alt Right message will have less appeal to them since Trump is already doing something for them.

    Elitism says the best-and-brightest and the best-connected should do whatever that maximizes their own power and privilege. Elitism severs the cultural, emotional, social, and political ties between the elites and the masses. Elitism goes well with globalism since the elites see masses just as cattle to hire and fire. Only the elites matter.
    The positive side of elitism is meritocracy, but there's no guarantee that those who gain most power and wealth under meritocracy will do things that are good for the people of the nation. Their main priority might just be enriching themselves.
    Also, there is no guarantee that the smartest and most qualified will play by the rules. Most people in Wall Street are very smart and got there through real ability. But so many have no scruples and no accountability. If MARGIN CALL is to be believed, ability isn't the same thing as accountability. It could mean smart people using their smarts to cheat more. That sure was the case in Russia in the 90s. So, talent isn't enough. There has to be a formula of talent and integrity and community.

    Populism, in contrast to elitism, speaks of the people and to the people. It calls for policies that favor the common man, the forgotten man. Populism says that politicians and those in power should heed the interests of the masses. People's concerns must always be taken into account when the rich and powerful make decisions.
    The negative side of populism is demagoguery. Because the masses tend to be ill-educated and rather ignorant, the demagogue can play to their fears, prejudices, and paranoia --- and Trump did some of this. Also, just because the elites are sometimes very wrong and the common man has it right, it doesn't mean that 'common sense' always trumps expertise. The worst kind of populist mania was seen in the Cultural Revolution where the mantra was 'red over expert'. Even Red Guard quacks were favored over doctors with real experience.

    The meeting point of elitism and populism is nationalism. Via nationalism, the system can have a leadership class with expertise and experience. And since the theme of nationalism is 'one for all and all for one', the elites must not lead and rule simply on the basis of elitism that priorities only the interests of the elites. Globalism encourages the elites to identify mainly with elites of other nations and to favor foreign masses for (cheap) labor over what used to be known as 'fellow countrymen'.
    Nationalism is where the left meets the right. It was the political product of the French Revolution that declared that the national leaders must represent the national masses.

    There are two concepts of three concepts of justice:

    1. Redress for a wrong. So, if someone stole from you, you must be made to give back what you stole or face punishment for the crime.

    2. Collective grievance. It is a macro-variation of 1. It argues that since an entire people were wronged, the wrong must be redressed on a collective level.

    3. Shared identity and interests. This concept of justice isn't about specific wrongs or any wrong done to someone. It is not reactive to a certain crime committed individually or historically.
    Rather, it is about the formula for the future. It is a vision that a people must move forward together. It call for strategies that best secure the well-being of all people even if it means extra weight for the best-and-brightest. For example, the best-and-brightest might be able to do most and make the biggest gains the fastest under globalism where they can access the cheapest labor and best brains from all over the world. But in doing so, they hurt the chances of national workers and national talent pool.
    This idea of justice might have originated with the Jews who, for a long time, emphasized tribal unity over royal privileges. Most pagan cultures had kings and nobles lording over others who were just seen as subject. But since the Jewish Covenant made even the lowest Jew with slit pud a precious child of God and blood descendant of Abraham, every Jew was seen as part of a big extended family. So, it wasn't enough for Jews to succeed as individuals. They had to think in terms of what is good for the Tribe. This concept of justice later morphed into Christianity where all of humanity was seen as one tribe of God. And then it later turned to communism that stressed that economics should ensure that all workers have a good and just life. A saner variation of this was Social-Democracy, New Deal, and National Socialism(if we remove the toxic radical racist ideology).
    Paradoxically, this unselfish view that may have originated among Jews --- it's like Moses has to be mindful to do the things that are good for all Jews, not only for himself --- could lead to extreme ethnic selfishness. So, while Jews among themselves must be mindful of one another and share --- Israel was founded by socialists --- , their narrow sense of tribal identity means Jews can exploit non-Jews. The worst example of this was in the 1990s when American Jews, European Jews, and Russian Jews all acted in concert to help one another while Russians fell into deep poverty, and by some estimates, 10 million died premature deaths. Ethno-centrism is fine if it's about one nation favoring itself over other nations. So, if Germans were to favor German identity/interests or if Japanese were to favor Japanese identity/interests, it's no big problem. Other nations, in turn, can guard their own interests. But ethno-centrism in a diverse nation can be problematic, especially if it's the powerful ethnocentrism of a minority group. When the US was 90% white gentile, its favoring of white ethno-interests wasn't fair to blacks and others. But it still served most people well. And when Civil Rights Movement happened, the US dedicated itself to serving ALL Americans. But when the US is ruled by Jews who are 2% of the population who are mainly allied to homos, another minority group, elite-ethno-centrism turns into narrowest kind of heartless greed.

    Perhaps, the Jews around Trump are seeing the danger signs of this. Unless there is a new formula that makes all Americans feel as 'fellow countrymen', the Alt Right meme-matches have the potential of setting off a forest fire one day.

    But who knows what is really going on in people's minds.
    The film SNOWDEN --- I have no idea how accurate it is --- offers a glimpse into what might be called the Deep Media of the Deep State. For us hoi polloi, there is only the mainstream media that give us official propaganda and the alternative media that speculates(without smoking gun proof since they don't have the means to probe into things). In contrast, NSA and CIA are like deep media that collects secret and insider information and shares those secrets ONLY with insiders. It is hardcore truth for insiders only. The real truth is hidden since 90% of what people say in public are lies. So, only the deep media knows the real truth. And since deep media got its information illegally(at least by conventional standards since what is legal for deep state would be illegal for the rest of us), it cannot be shared publicly.
    And access to this information doesn't necessarily include politicians and even the president since the deep state has the power to withhold information from even those it is supposed to serve.
    And unless we have access to the deep media, we don't know what is really happening.
    Today, the deep media know more than ever before since digital technology enables such easy spying on just about anything.
    For the masses, there is mainstream media that are mostly useless.
    For the academics, there is scholarly media that are more knowledgeable. While scholarly discourse can be accessed by fellow scholars and even ordinary people, much of it happens in the exclusive halls of academe. Also, even though some scholars are connected to government and have access to deep media, many don't. Their knowledge is limited to their level of access. Historians usually have to wait many years before the archives are opened up. But even then, many key documents were destroyed by the deep state.

    In contrast, there are some within the deep state with access to the most private information. So, this deep media serves only the super-insiders. And these people surely kept tabs on Miller, Trump, and etc. If anyone can blackmail anyone, it is not the Russians. It is those in the US deep state that has best technology to spy on anyone. (One wonders if the reason why Merkel is so slavish to the US is because the US deep state has recordings of her saying insensitive things about, say, Jewish power?)

    Snowden had access to deep media and decided to play the role of prometheus by sharing it with the people. I never got the impression that Snowden is a Trump supporter. And he is no Putin-supporter and ended up in Russia accidentally cuz his Visa was revoked. But there is a Russian-connection in the sense that what happened in Russia proved to be a harbinger for what happened in the US. Though Trump is far from Putin, both came to power due to excessive globalism that was dismissive of the interests of the national masses. In the case of Putin, a deep state operative steeped in KGB dirty tricks, headed the new national front. It was Putin against the oligarchs. Putin could play gangster against gangsters because he knew the ins-and-outs of power, like Stalin did.
    In the case of Trump, it is a NY oligarch who presented himself as the champion of the people against the deep state. But then, some like Linh Dinh say Trump is really a tool of the deep state. But then, there are surely various factions in the deep state. A kind of hidden silent civil war within the deep state?
    Putin's style is more like Michael Corleone, Trump's is more like Tony Montana.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW37AGZ0Pj0

    Snowden's revelations about the deep state was instructive because it showed that if we dig deeper into the sources of power, we see that both parties are joined at the hip. They look like two separate trees but are actually one tree beneath the ground joined to the same roots.
    The Trumpian narrative was that he was opposed by both parties beholden to the deep state. Therefore, it's not enough to chop down the rotten trees but dig out the evil roots from which both trees grew. Or drain the swamp. It's not enough to pick up the flotsam floating on top.
    But according to Linh Dinh, Trump was aided by the deep state against the two parties. This may seem counter-intuitive since so many people in the intelligence community stood with Hillary and denounced Trump. But maybe there is a deeper state within deep state.

    A good commentary, tribal /racial patronage is very dangerous in a multicultural society , in fact the most destructive activity of all and US Jews have been heavily involved in it since the 1930′s to gain key power positions in industry and government (e.g. Summers & Kagan as just two current examples).

    That leads on to another point. Given that US Jewry is only 2% of the population, it is entirely dependent on network power functioning through existing laws and institutions, so they have a big interest in supporting the legal framework and institutional power (manipulate it but don’t break it).

    If the structure of society should break down like in revolutionary France or Russia the 1% (the aristocracy) lose their shield and are at great risk in the resulting chaos. The exception of course would be if the Jews themselves foment and lead the revolution, as they did in Russia in October 1917 (in this case they were the ones liquidating the old aristocracy to replace it with a new one – their own – taking over vacant aristocratic homes, adopting Pushkin evenings, elite schools, weekend dachas etc.).

    Read More
  65. @War for Blair Mountain
    Perhaps you missed your calling during the Kenyan Foriegner years as standup comic taunting the White Female gang rape victims in the Syosset Diner robbery...Perhaps you could have had a promising career in the David Dinkins Administration?...Your a barrel of laughs!!!...If only my late cousin could be alive today to appreciate your whacky sense of humor!!! You should be America's first comic laureate....

    Nobody was killed during this event and again, I’ve mentioned Ted Bundy, Dahmer, and the Ripper Crew, which happened roughly at the same time, they raped, ATE, AND KILLED white people (including women).

    Why don’t you care?

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    But you joked about the negro beast gang rape of White Women as did David Dinkins' right hand Negro Beast Bill White...

    I'm not interested in your juevenile-sicko-debaters game. Native Born White Americans...including the Jewish ANTIFA who assaulted Richard Spencer..... d0n't won't to live among Negros for very good reasons. Perhaps you can volunteer to live in Westbury-Hempstead-Bed Sty. Other Unz Review commenters can provide the blizzard of Negro sexual assaults on White Women FBI statistics.


    For the rest of you:the larger point are demographic consequences of former R0nnie Reagan Yout's enthusiasm for the Cold War-anti-Commie crusade...Barack Obama's birth was one of them...as was-is Barack Obama's-Valerie Jarrette's agitation for racial vi0lence against D0nald Trump's Native Born White American Voting Bloc.
  66. @Truth
    Nobody was killed during this event and again, I've mentioned Ted Bundy, Dahmer, and the Ripper Crew, which happened roughly at the same time, they raped, ATE, AND KILLED white people (including women).

    Why don't you care?

    But you joked about the negro beast gang rape of White Women as did David Dinkins’ right hand Negro Beast Bill White…

    I’m not interested in your juevenile-sicko-debaters game. Native Born White Americans…including the Jewish ANTIFA who assaulted Richard Spencer….. d0n’t won’t to live among Negros for very good reasons. Perhaps you can volunteer to live in Westbury-Hempstead-Bed Sty. Other Unz Review commenters can provide the blizzard of Negro sexual assaults on White Women FBI statistics.

    For the rest of you:the larger point are demographic consequences of former R0nnie Reagan Yout’s enthusiasm for the Cold War-anti-Commie crusade…Barack Obama’s birth was one of them…as was-is Barack Obama’s-Valerie Jarrette’s agitation for racial vi0lence against D0nald Trump’s Native Born White American Voting Bloc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Oh, so you're not going to answer why you do not care about white women being killed and eaten? Your negro beast gang rapists let their victims live.
  67. @War for Blair Mountain
    But you joked about the negro beast gang rape of White Women as did David Dinkins' right hand Negro Beast Bill White...

    I'm not interested in your juevenile-sicko-debaters game. Native Born White Americans...including the Jewish ANTIFA who assaulted Richard Spencer..... d0n't won't to live among Negros for very good reasons. Perhaps you can volunteer to live in Westbury-Hempstead-Bed Sty. Other Unz Review commenters can provide the blizzard of Negro sexual assaults on White Women FBI statistics.


    For the rest of you:the larger point are demographic consequences of former R0nnie Reagan Yout's enthusiasm for the Cold War-anti-Commie crusade...Barack Obama's birth was one of them...as was-is Barack Obama's-Valerie Jarrette's agitation for racial vi0lence against D0nald Trump's Native Born White American Voting Bloc.

    Oh, so you’re not going to answer why you do not care about white women being killed and eaten? Your negro beast gang rapists let their victims live.

    Read More
  68. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Johnny Smoggins
    Melania's such a contrast to the baboon that Obama is married to.

    She is easy on the eyes; so are the rest of the Trump women. Tho Melania looked stiff most of the time, surprising for someone accustomed to being at the side of such a public figure.

    otoh, most of the rest of female grandstand sitters — the Main Attractions and especially the wives of Main Attractions– should have stayed home. They looked like they’d never worn anything other than rump-sprung sweatpants.

    except for Paul Ryan’s wife; she has a pleasing appearance and presence.

    Read More
  69. I have to say I think Jackie Evancho was a mistake for the national anthem. She was plainly nervous. Her voice came across as unsteady and rather small, the enunciation not very good

    .

    To be faire (sic :) ) a lot of that was the terrible network feed that was distributed. You can compare two versions below. The Capitol feed was far superior. It almost sounds like network sabotage.

    Capitol feed: http://www.smh.com.au/video/video-news/video-world-news/jackie-evancho-sings-at-trumps-inauguration-20170120-4pmoy.html

    Network feed (the one on Youtube): https://youtu.be/Eofd3K7xyms

    Read More
  70. @Truth
    I'm sorry if you are offended my friend...

    ...Do you make a habit of joking about murder and rape?... (yes, some of the date “rape” lunacy can be funny, and Michael Brown gave cause to be shot blatantly enough I can see making jokes about that...
     
    ...but one would assume, from your own comments, that it is not jokes about"murder and rape" that you find egregious, but jokes about THIS murder and rape, and particularly because it involves; 1. white victims, 2. black offenders; no other reason.

    Here's a gift; offensive or funny?

    http://www.yuksrus.com/celebs_jeffery_dahmer.html

    http://media.photobucket.com/user/thingsandwhatnot/media/True%20Crime/For%20the%20Lulz/tumblr_m6cdk88cow1qator8o6_400.jpg.html?filters[term]=ted bundy victims serial killer&filters[primary]=images&filters[secondary]=videos&sort=1&o=22

    I’m sorry if you are offended my friend…

    If the things you post here are a fair indication of your personality I’m not sure I have any interest in being your “friend.”

    but jokes about THIS murder and rape, and particularly because it involves; 1. white victims, 2. black offenders

    No. The things that bother me:
    1. The brutality of the crimes.
    2. That you were making fun of the victims not the criminals as in your first link.

    If you really can’t get that from my comments you are dumber than I believe (from yours) so please stop imputing false beliefs to me.

    Only looked at your first link since the second is broken and it felt like a waste of time to sort out.

    Read More
  71. @jacques sheete


    … because who can define what the “national interest is”

     

    Isn’t that what parliaments are for?
     
    That's what the dreamers believe they're for.

    Mia culpa. I should have included the qualifier “supposed” -i.e., isn’t that what parliaments are supposed to be for?

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Limbaugh and company certainly entertain. But a steady diet of ideological comfort food is no substitute for hearty intellectual fare.
Once as a colonial project, now as a moral playground, the ancient continent remains the object of Great Power maneuvering