The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJonathan Cook Archive
With Criticism Crushed in the West, Israel Can Enjoy Its Impunity
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Recent events have shone a spotlight not only on how Israel is intensifying its abuse of Palestinians under its rule, but the utterly depraved complicity of western governments in its actions.

The arrival of Donald Trump in the White House two-and-a-half years ago has emboldened Israel as never before, leaving it free to unleash new waves of brutality in the occupied territories.

Western states have not only turned a blind eye to these outrages, but are actively assisting in silencing anyone who dares to speak out.

It is rapidly creating a vicious spiral: the more Israel violates international law, the more the West represses criticism, the more Israel luxuriates in its impunity.

This shameless descent was starkly illustrated last week when hundreds of heavily armed Israeli soldiers, many of them masked, raided a neighbourhood of Sur Baher, on the edges of Jerusalem. Explosives and bulldozers destroyed dozens of homes, leaving many hundreds of Palestinians without a roof over their heads.

During the operation, extreme force was used against residents, as well as international volunteers there in the forlorn hope that their presence would deter violence. Videos showed the soldiers cheering and celebrating as they razed the neighbourhood.

House destructions have long been an ugly staple of Israel’s belligerent occupation, but there were grounds for extra alarm on this occasion.

Traditionally, demolitions occur on the two-thirds of the West Bank placed by the Oslo accords temporarily under Israeli control. That is bad enough: Israel should have handed over what is called “Area C” to the Palestinian Authority 20 years ago. Instead, it has hounded Palestinians off these areas to free them up for illegal Jewish settlement.

But the Sur Baher demolitions took place in “Area A”, land assigned by Oslo to the Palestinians’ government-in-waiting – as a prelude to Palestinian statehood. Israel is supposed to have zero planning or security jurisdiction there.

Palestinians rightly fear that Israel has established a dangerous precedent, further reversing the Oslo Accords, which can one day be used to justify driving many thousands more Palestinians off land under PA control.

Most western governments barely raised their voices. Even the United Nations offered a mealy-mouthed expression of “sadness” at what took place.

A few kilometres north, in Issawiya, another East Jerusalem suburb, Israeli soldiers have been terrorising 20,000 Palestinian residents for weeks. They have set up checkpoints, carried out dozens of random night-time arrests, imposed arbitrary fines and traffic tickets, and shot live ammunition and rubber-coated steel bullets into residential areas.

Ir Amim, an Israeli human rights group, calls Issawiya’s treatment a “perpetual state of collective punishment” – that is, a war crime.

Over in Gaza, not only are the 2 million inhabitants being slowly starved by Israel’s 12-year blockade, but a weekly shooting spree against Palestinians who protest at the fence imprisoning them has become so routine it barely attracts attention any more.

On Friday, Israeli snipers killed one protester and seriously injured 56, including 22 children.

That followed new revelations that Israeli’s policy of shooting unarmed protesters in the upper leg to injure them – another war crime – continued long after it became clear a significant proportion of Palestinians were dying from their wounds.

Belatedly – after more than 200 deaths and the severe disabling of many thousands of Palestinians – snipers have been advised to “ease up” by shooting protesters in the ankle.

B’Tselem, another Israeli rights organisation, called the army’s open-fire regulation a “criminal policy”, one that “consciously chose not to regard those standing on the other side of the fence as humans”.

Rather than end such criminal practices, Israel prefers to conceal them. It has effectively sealed Palestinian areas off to avoid scrutiny.

Omar Shakir, a researcher for Human Rights Watch, is facing imminent deportation, yet more evidence of Israel’s growing crackdown on the human rights community.

A report by the Palestinian Right to Enter campaign last week warned that Israel is systematically denying foreign nationals permits to live and work in the occupied territories, including areas supposedly under PA control.

That affects both foreign-born Palestinians, often those marrying local Palestinians, and internationals. According to recent reports, Israel is actively forcing out academics teaching at the West Bank’s leading university, Bir Zeit, in a severe blow to Palestinian academic freedom.

Palestinian journalists highlighting Israeli crimes are in Israel’s sights too. Last week, Israel stripped one – Mustafa Al Haruf – of his Jerusalem residency, tearing him from his wife and young child. Because it is illegal to leave someone stateless, Israel is now bullying Jordan to accept him.

Another exclusion policy – denying entry to Israel’s fiercest critics, those who back the international boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement – is facing its first challenge.

Two US congresswomen who support BDS – Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, who has family in the West Bank – have announced plans to visit.

Israeli officials have indicated they will exempt them both, apparently fearful of drawing wider attention to Israel’s draconian entry restrictions, which also cover the occupied territories.

Israel is probably being overly cautious. The BDS movement, which alone argues for the imposition of penalties on Israel until it halts its abuse of Palestinians, is being bludgeoned by western governments.

In the US and Europe, strong criticism of Israel, even from Jews – let alone demands for meaningful action – is being conflated with antisemitism. Much of this furore seems intended to ease the path towards silencing Israel’s critics.

More than two dozen US states, as well as the Senate, have passed laws – drafted by pro-Israel lobby groups – to limit the rights of the American public to support boycotts of Israel.

Anti-BDS legislation has also been passed by the German and French parliaments.

And last week the US House of Representatives joined them, overwhelmingly passing a resolution condemning the BDS movement. Only 17 legislators demurred.

It was a slap in the face to Omar, who has been promoting a bill designed to uphold the First Amendment rights of boycott supporters.

It seems absurd that these curbs on free speech have emerged just as Israel makes clear it has no interest in peace, will never concede Palestinian statehood and is entrenching a permanent system of apartheid in the occupied territories.

But there should be no surprise. The clampdown is further evidence that western support for Israel is indeed based on shared values – those that treat the Palestinians as lesser beings, whose rights can be trampled at will.

A version of this article first appeared in the National, Abu Dhabi.

ORDER IT NOW

Jonathan Cook won the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. His books include “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East” (Pluto Press) and “Disappearing Palestine: Israel’s Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His website is www.jonathan-cook.net.

 
Hide 38 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. so the perpetual battle continues: who can descend deepest into depraved sub-humanity – the zionist or the shabbos goy.
    my shekels as ever, are of course on the zionist. He has three thousand years of practice.

    • Replies: @Morgyn the Mighty
  2. Israel is a great nation and I’m so happy President Trump stands with her! Kick Iran’s ass boys! 🙂

  3. A123 says:

    Yet more painfully obvious Taqiyya lies….

    … raided a neighbourhood of Sur Baher, on the edges of Jerusalem. Explosives and bulldozers destroyed dozens of homes, leaving many hundreds of Palestinians without a roof over their heads.

    And, now the truth:

    https://news.yahoo.com/israel-says-12-palestinian-buildings-destroyed-controversial-demolition-110918192.html

    a total of 12 Palestinian buildings it considered illegally constructed were demolished in a controversial operation the previous day, while a UN preliminary assessment showed 24 people displaced.

    How does 24 = many hundreds???? Ah yes…. Pallywood non-logic… Hate is more important than facts. Even U.N. supplied facts.

    Also worth noting… The residents had *seven years* notice that the buildings were illegal. So, in *seven years* 24 people could not find legitimate living space! Really? Wow!!!
    ________

    The answer is *really easy*. If Muslim Palestinian occupiers of Jewish Palestinian land want better treatment, all they have to do is stop occupying Jewish Palestine.

    But, make sure to avoid Nasrallah’s stomping ground Muslim Lebanon… Lebanese Muslim brutality against Muslim Palestinians is much worse than anything found in Jewish Palestine.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/07/lets_talk_about_real_discrimination.html

    In Lebanon … Palestinians are banned from owning property, forced to live in run-down camps, and barred from formal education. In addition, Palestinians cannot own businesses in Lebanon and are banned from most decent-paying professions, including medicine and law. An estimated two thirds live in poverty.

    Nasrallah and Iranian al’Hezbollah care so much about Muslim Palestinines, they express the Muslim Pillar of Charity by forcing 2/3 of them to live in poverty. Somehow, that doesn’t seem very charitable….

    PEACE

    • Replies: @zigzag wanderer
    , @jester
    , @Anon
  4. @Alf Tupper

    Alf,

    Is that you, the “Tough of the Track”? Are you still running and competing?

    • Replies: @Alf Tupper
  5. Paul says:

    I get a kick out of the Washington Post suggesting that Donald Trump is racist. The Post is a perpetual apologist for ethnic-cleansing Israel’s racism against the indigenous Palestinian people.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  6. So, Jewish Power took the homeland from Palestinians, and Jewish Power took away freedom of speech from whites in the West.

    Palestinians must accept invasion by Zionists, and white people must accept being gagged by Jewish globalists.

    In a way, the two are connected. Palestinians and whites. Whites enabled Jews in the destruction of Palestine, and now Jews take away with freedom and autonomy from whites. What goes around comes around. Whites should never have emboldened Jews to destroy the Palestinians. Now, Jews feel they can treat whites like More Palestinians. No land for Palestinians, and No Free Speech for whites.
    No Free Speech means whites will also lose their homeland as those who can’t say NO to mass-immigration-invasion are fated to go the way of dinosaurs.

    • Agree: Miggle
    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
  7. @Paul

    But the irony is Trump totally supports Zionist destruction of Palestinians even though Jews are the forefront of treating whites as More Palestinians.

  8. The criminal enterprise of Israel has bribed most NATO-bloc governments with skimmed US aid, but they have a harder time controlling the free world. Institutional safeguards built into the treaty-body system choose expert staff as international civil servants acting on their own behalf rather than as national apparatchiks. So we have comprehensive documented evidence on the mechanics of programmatic Israeli extermination. Israeli government crimes against humanity are open-and-shut cases just waiting for Israel’s USG tools to lose one war too many.

    https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/MENARegion/Pages/ILIndex.aspx

    https://ccprcentre.org/page/112nd-session-in-brief/israel-the-applicability-of-the-iccpr-to-occupied-palestinian-territory-is-again-a-main-concern-of-the-israel-review

    http://www.treatybodywebcast.org/cat-57th-session-israel/

    http://www.treatybodywebcast.org/crc-63rd-session-israel/

    http://www.treatybodywebcast.org/cerd-80-israel/

    The state of Israel is hostis humani generis. BDS is half-assed bullshit banned only to distract you. You know we’ve got to cut the head off the Israeli snake with prosecutions for the gravest crimes.

  9. @Honnête Juif

    Honnête Juif. – honest Jew

    hostis humani generis – enemy of mankind

    “Institutional safeguards built into the treaty-body system choose expert staff as international civil servants acting on their own behalf rather than as national apparatchiks.”

    Apologies for my ignorance (and also, I have not had the time to listen to ALL of the testimonies, only about 45 min); I do not understand what “treaty-body system” signifies.
    Does it have institutional heft? Does “treaty – system” have enforcement capability, and also, mechanisms to protect itself/its members?

    (Agree, BDS = BS, a distraction for the masses)

    The Koch-Soros collaboration, Quincy Institute, might offer a glimmer of hope.
    Stephen Wertheim a Co-Founder of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft and Research Director of its Ending Endless War program. He is also a Research Scholar at the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University.

    He’s a young man with an impressive body of scholarship under his belt–
    http://www.columbia.edu/~saw2156/scholarship.html

    and ability to articulate calmly
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?463050-5/washington-journal-stephen-wertheim-discusses-diplomacy-us-foreign-policy

    ___
    Is Jeff Gates still active?
    ,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr56HuPf-9o

  10. Right, SoCro, good question, I should have been clearer. In US law a treaty is supreme law of the land under the supremacy clause, specifically equivalent to federal statute per the La Paquete Habana decision. A treaty body is an organization of treaty parties (countries that made an international legal commitment,) organized as the treaty requires. Examples are the Committee Against Torture or The Human Rights Committee. The treaty party (the US government) commits to conform all municipal (domestic) law to the treaty’s terms. The treaty body reviews the treaty party’s compliance and gives interpretive direction. Treaty bodies get compliance information from charter bodies (e.g. the Human Rights Council,) special procedures like mandates or OHCHR rapporteur visits, and domestic human rights advocates (so you can go over your government’s head to the outside world, e.g. with ushrnetwork.org.)

    The teeth are concerted diplomatic pressures by treaty parties, often, for the US, amounting to public shaming and disgrace – and where non-derogable rights like torture are concerned, international criminal law comes in, permitting investigations and prosecutions in forums including the ICC, or state prosecutions in universal jurisdiction (both of those are happening to CIA and JSOC torturers.)

    Persistent noncompliance of a less egregious sort is met with a loss of international standing that jeopardizes institutional influence – as Britain found out when it got kicked off the ICJ bench for the first time. Their human rights abuses in the Chagos Islands cost them their longstanding privilege of drafting international legal precedent. The US got kicked off the Human Rights Commission for similar screwups, and the world tightened the screws on them while the US had no say. So the teeth involve pacific suasion and material loss of influence or soft power.

    That’s conventional international law. The US is also bound by customary international law as state and federal common law. So we have all these legal protections,

    https://ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/UniversalHumanRightsInstruments.aspx

    enforced not by bribed and blackmailed US hacks in judge robes, but by the outside world. Considering how our shitty worthless toilet-paper constitution got revoked, the universal instruments are all we have. They’re handy when you’re ready to secede from this underdeveloped US shithole, too.

  11. A123 says:

    In US law a treaty is supreme law of the land under the supremacy clause, specifically equivalent to federal statute per the La Paquete Habana decision.

    The important thing to note about this standard is:
    — Treaties are equivalent to Laws.
    — Laws are subordinate to the Constitution.

    Therefore, treaties cannot transfer Legislative, Executive, or Judicial powers enumerated in the Constitution to another body, such as the U.N. Such a transfer would require a Constitutional Amendment.

    Well defined treaties (of limited scope) take this into account. For example, Trade treaties have a review process that stays away from judicial functions (more akin to arbitration). Similarly, the maximum consequences are explicitly defined. For example, a trade Treaty that reduces tariffs would suspend that reduction as a consequence.

    Trying to fit the activities of the U.N. into mandatory limits imposed by the Constitution is difficult to unworkable, as no Amendment transferred reserved and enumerated Legislative authority to the U.N.
    __________

    Here is a good example:

    The Treaty Clause is part of Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution that empowers the President of the United States to propose and chiefly negotiate agreements between the United States and other countries, which, upon receiving the advice and consent of a two-thirds supermajority vote of the United States Senate, become binding with the force of federal law.

    The UNSC Representative for the U.S. serves at the pleasure of the President. Thus, that Rep can negotiate a new treaty on behalf of the president. However, to bind subsequent administrations, such a Treaty still *must* as a matter of Constitutional law obtain a vote of 2/3 of the Senate.

    Barak Hussein did not submit the JCPOA to the Senate, and did not obtain the *Constitutionally Required* ratification to bind subsequent administrations. Instead he used the inherently transitory, Executive Order power to make JCPOA binding on his, and only his, administration. President Trump is 100% correct under the U.S. Constitution. None of Barak Hussein’s Executive Orders, including the one related to JCPOA, bind his administration.
    _______

    George Soros and his NWO Globalist, elitiest, anti-democratic crazies keep lying when they say the U.N. represents the supreme authority on the planet. Do not listen to their absurdist propaganda.

    In the past, both Russia and China have also refused to go along with U.N. findings that violated their national sovereignty, so it is not like the U.S. is alone. No nation of substance is submissive before U.N. authority, because it has very little actual power.

    PEACE

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  12. @A123

    You conveniently left this bit out of your quote from yahoo news ….. “More than 300 people were affected by the demolitions, it said.”
    There … fixed that for you.

    • Replies: @A123
  13. @Morgyn the Mighty

    indeed, and sticking rigorously to the time honoured athlete’s diet of British fish and chips.

    • Replies: @jester
  14. @A123

    “No nation of substance is submissive before U.N. authority, because it has very little actual power.”

    Therefore, Israel is ipso facto illegitimate.

    • Replies: @A123
  15. A123 says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Therefore, Israel is ipso facto illegitimate.

    I think you have a serious typo. Let me help… Everyone understands you actually meant:

    Therefore, SolentoCroeses is ipso facto incomprehensible

    PEACE

    • Replies: @jester
  16. A123 says:
    @zigzag wanderer

    Zig,

    Take your racist swastika lies and go away….

    The 300 people “affected” were not allowed to move in and got their money back.

    I know you are a Nazi…. You know you are a Nazi… Everyone knows you are a Nazi…..

    No piles of dead Jews for you today….. Tough break….

    PEACE

    • Replies: @eah
    , @Anon
  17. Very interesting, A123! But don’t get all wrapped around the axle trying to parse the constitution cause it’s gone. You’re not getting it back. Remember when Rumsfeld went to DEFCON 3, invoking COG? COG created an indefinite ICCPR-illegal state of emergency that revoked your constitution and replaced it with Vietnam-style Phoenix centers called fusion centers in every state. You live in a totalitarian kleptocracy under the iron heel of dumbshit job-shopped DHS Nazis.

    It’s no loss, your constitution was an obsolete piece of shit anyway. No country has adopted anything like it for 100 years. If you ever get a chance to get one again you should adapt Russia’s, or one from any middling African shithole. They’re state of the art, much better protection for all your rights. You’ll be surprised how nice it is to have world-standard rights and not the niggardly hind-tit scraps of rights your criminal CIA government makes you beg for. They’re really not worth shit.

    • Replies: @jester
  18. eah says:

    Anti-BDS legislation has also been passed by the German and French parliaments.

    In both of those countries — as in most European countries — you can go to jail for denying the ‘Holocaust’ — things aren’t that bad in the US…yet.

    And last week the US House of Representatives joined them, overwhelmingly passing a resolution condemning the BDS movement. Only 17 legislators demurred.

    A resolution is not a law.

    It was a slap in the face to Omar, who has been promoting a bill designed to uphold the First Amendment rights of boycott supporters.

    That’s all it was: “a slap in the face” — she can still promote the bill (whatever it is) — how far she’ll get with that is another question.

    It seems absurd that these curbs on free speech have emerged…

    Anti-BDS legislation is destined to fail — any such law will almost certainly not survive legal challenge: this already happened in Texas.

    Whether or not anti-BDS activity by government, eg the House resolution, has an effect on free speech, ie if it will discourage BDS activity by making it seem morally reprehensible, is not clear — it’s probably designed to do that.

    It all comes down to the ‘Holocaust’, as does the existence of the state of Israel itself — the ‘Holocaust’ is the Jewish franchise on victimhood — due to the alleged nature of the ‘Holocaust’, ie a state-sponsored plan of mass murder, even total extermination, aimed at Jews, the Jewish victimhood franchise is by far the world’s most valuable — this has to change.

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
    • Replies: @jester
  19. eah says:
    @A123

    Israel says the homes south of Jerusalem were built too close to its separation barrier cutting off the occupied West Bank, posing a security risk, and the demolitions were approved by its supreme court following a lengthy process.

    The ‘considering’ process in Israel seems rather flexible — just ‘consider’ some buildings to be “too close” (how close is “too close”? — is that some universal constant like the speed of light in a vacuum?) to some “barrier”, which can presumably be built pretty much anywhere Israel wants to build it, and presto the buildings are “illegal” and can be demolished — cool.

    Just like recently ‘considering’ that the Golan Heights actually belong to Israel — also cool.

    Yes, that whole ‘considering’ process Israel goes through works really well for the Jews, and is really flexible.

    • Replies: @A123
  20. Tsigantes says:

    It seems absurd that these curbs on free speech have emerged just as Israel makes clear it has no interest in peace, will never concede Palestinian statehood and is entrenching a permanent system of apartheid in the occupied territories.

    Hardly absurd, this is obviously by design.

  21. A123 says:
    @eah

    The ‘considering’ process in Israel seems rather flexible — just ‘consider’ some buildings to be “too close” (how close is “too close”? — is that some universal constant like the speed of light in a vacuum?) to some “barrier” … … Yes, that whole ‘considering’ process Israel goes through works really well for the Jews, and is really flexible.

    In this case, the consideration was the height and construction of the buildings providing fortified “sniper’s nests” higher than the barrer, intended to allow violent PLO/PA assassins the opportunity to target defenseless Jewish children.

    If violent Jihadist invaders do not like the overly generous ‘consideration’ provided by Palestinian Jews, there is an *easy* answer. The Jihadist occupiers can exercise their ‘right to return’ to Mecca, Qom, or another ‘flexible’ Muslim locale that will accept them.

    PEACE

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  22. jester says:
    @Honnête Juif

    I could not agree more. If the US constitution were toilet paper I would not wipe my ass with it !

  23. jester says:
    @A123

    It has taken you and many other readers of this site a very long time to realize the Solonto is really an intellectually deficient cuckoo …kinda like a $5M study that concludes smoking is bad for your lungs.

    OR…did you realize he was a nut ball all along but you tried your best to be polite ??

    I dont read any of his tripe because what he says is disjointed, rambling, goes off topic and brings nothing new or logical to the discussion.

    Incomprehensible ?? You are extremely diplomatic !!

    • LOL: A123
  24. jester says:
    @Alf Tupper

    You ought to recommend this diet to some of our commentators. I rather suspect what they eat is contributing to diminished brain function if indeed any sort of brain exists and if it did, was it ever a functioning unit.

  25. jester says:
    @eah

    Unfortunately those Jews ain’t going to discard something that works and is also profitable.

    I doubt any of them care whether it is true or false, the whole point of the exercise is maniipulation and PROFIT !

    As the old saying goes: If it works don’t break it and don’t fix it !

  26. jester says:
    @A123

    Everyone loves these Palestinians so much but no other Arab country wants them. Further , the Western world trumpets their concerns and objections all day yet there they remain.

    Like a second son they must file a lawsuit for their daily bread only the case has been dragging on for how many years ?? I guess the judges are perpetually out of the office.

    Here is a suggestion,,all readers of this site who feel the Palestinians are hard done by are encouraged to sponsor a family:
    1. Send over enough money every month to cover their living expenses
    2. While doing so proceed to US Immigration and sponsor them
    3. When they arrive in the US, feed clothe and house them until they can get on their feet

    We already see the effects on Europe of mass and uncontrolled immigration. Many US states and cities are now beginning to feel the pinch from having these deadbeat residents both legal and illegal.

    I anxiously await the rush of bleeding hearts to help these people. If each of you snowflakes sponsor one family the Palestinian problem will be solved. Besides, what can be a better place to live than Europe or the US. A better life awaits them there and here.

    The whole love and hugs thing for these folks is highly entertaining keeping the Jester endlessly amused.

  27. @jester

    /the Western world trumpets their concerns and objections all day/

    You’re obviously not from America.

    Those who “trumpet their concerns” are few and far between here. Most still have no clue what’s happening on the ground over there, though the net has changed the landscape somewhat, thank God for that.

    As for sending money to Palestine, those organizations once involved in so doing were accused of abetting “terrorists” thanks to the most powerful lobby in the country. It didn’t matter if the funds were actually being used for humanitarian purposes or not, that’s what the Lobby does: fight to shut down every avenue of foreign assistance.

    And attempting to link the Palestinian cause of self-determination with the problems of mass migration to the west is just sloppy propaganda. Lame.

    Anyhow, thanks for showing us who you really are. Saves us a lot of time.

  28. anonymous[144] • Disclaimer says:
    @jester

    Everyone loves these Palestinians so much but no other Arab country wants them.

    — but then Arab countries want Jews even less

    — fact is, so many countries don’t want jews that they have to kill, blackmail & bribe to get jews into a country,
    — and once there, they subvert it.

  29. @A123

    /In this case, the consideration was the height and construction of the buildings providing fortified “sniper’s nests” higher than the barrer, intended to allow violent PLO/PA assassins the opportunity to target defenseless Jewish children./

    Two facts demonstrate you’re a liar:

    1. The apartment building owner wanted to build a high concrete wall at his own expense to satisfy Israel’s alleged “security concerns.” He even offered to pay for security cameras that Israel could use.

    2. Close to the apartment building, breaches in the “security fence” were created by Israel and have yet to be repaired.

    https://outline.com/YwnXkA

    Keep ’em comin’, Shlomo. It’s a real pleasure to demolish your facade.

    • Replies: @A123
  30. A123 says:
    @AnonStarter

    The apartment building owner wanted to build a high concrete wall at his own expense to satisfy Israel’s alleged “security concerns.”

    WOW!!! Less than 1% of the cost to you is a “solution”. [laughter]

    Keep up the Taqiyya lying for your murderous Blood Prophet. At this rate with 30 to 40 years of practice you might deliver your first credible lie…..

    Sorry… You don’t get to butcher any Jewish children today…. Tough break….

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  31. @A123

    Read the article, Shlomo. He agreed to pay the cost in full.

    And even if he didn’t, you folks have already drained enough of our tax dollars to pay for 100% of it.

    As for lying, Zionists are the grandmasters of prevarication:

    http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/hf_LyingPermissible.html

  32. I have no idea why people come to a race realist site to virtue-signal by sticking their tongues up the assholes of IQ-75 Mohammedan rabble who are little different from Negroes. If you love them so much, go live with them.

  33. Anon[505] • Disclaimer says:
    @A123

    You’ve been discredited off of this board many times over, especially in your fake animosity toward Islam, if for no other reason than the many times proven and often Jewish stated alliance with Islam toward the destruction of the West.

    Go help your Semitic brethren fuck camels in the dessert and leave civilization to its creators.

  34. Anon[505] • Disclaimer says:
    @A123

    Take your racist swastika lies and go away….

    LOL… says the racially-inbred, ethnonationalist Jew with texts full of explicit genocidal and dispossession intent toward all out-groups.

    If racism and the swastika are anti-Jewish, then they are implicitly two of the most morally correct things that we have at our disposal today.

    Whats your wager on the increase in the tally of the total number of nations that the Jews will have gotten themselves kicked out of, for being complete jerkoffs to non-Jews, by 2100?

  35. @Priss Factor

    We are all Palestinians now, Priss.

  36. @jester

    Everyone loves these Palestinians so much but no other Arab country wants them.

    FACT CHECK: There are millions of Palestinian refugees living in a variety of Arab countries, such as Lebanon, Syria and Jordan.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_refugees

    That number does not even include Palestinian exiles who have individual residency permits in other Arab countries (usually in the Persian Gulf) for work purposes, the economy of Palestine having been thoroughly demolished by you-know-who.

    Here is a suggestion,,all readers of this site who feel the Palestinians are hard done by are encouraged to sponsor a family:
    1. Send over enough money every month to cover their living expenses

    Can we deduct that money from the billions in aid we give the Zionists every year?

    2. While doing so proceed to US Immigration and sponsor them

    Why can’t they just be allowed to ‘make aliyah’ to Palestine?

    3. When they arrive in the US, feed clothe and house them until they can get on their feet

    You know, generations ago, before the Nakba, the Palestinians used to run farms and businesses and take care of themselves just fine.

    We already see the effects on Europe of mass and uncontrolled immigration.

    All those wars for Israel in the ME sure haven’t helped!

  37. The clampdown is further evidence that western support for Israel is indeed based on shared values – those that treat the Palestinians as lesser beings, whose rights can be trampled at will.

    Poppycock! Western support for Israel has nothing to do with “values”; it is simply evidence of (((ZOG))).

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jonathan Cook Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?