The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Wicked Muslims, Innocent Jews
The Deceit and Double-Think of Mark Steyn
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Islamophobe Mark Steyn
Islamophobe Mark Steyn

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

My late father simultaneously abhorred Muslims and adulated Jews. Muslims were savage, stupid and very bad for the West. Jews were civilized, intelligent and very good for the West. What more need be said? A lot, I thought. I pointed out that Muslims were in the West because of Jews. My father dismissed this as nonsense. Jews weren’t stupid and Muslims were enemies of Jews. Therefore Jews could not possibly want Muslims in the West.

Reality shmeality

I produced copious evidence to back my claim, but it didn’t alter my father’s views in the slightest. If his subjective logic said Jews opposed Muslim immigration, while objective reality said they supported it, then so much the worse for reality. Muslims were bad, Jews were good. End of story. It should be no surprise, then, that my father was also a big fan of Mark Steyn, the shape-shifting neo-conservative who has recently aired one of his favourite themes:

Pre-war Europeans would never have entertained for a moment the construction of mosques from Malmö to Marseilles. But post-war Holocaust guilt, and the revulsion against nationalism and the embrace of multiculturalism and mass immigration, enabled the Islamization of Europe. The principal beneficiaries of the Continent’s penance for the great moral stain of the 20th century turned out to be the Muslims — with the Jews on the receiving end, yet again. (Butcher Bob Out of His Job?, SteynOnline, 15th November 2017)

He then said, with unblushing chutzpah, “It would help to be able to talk about this issue honestly.”

It would indeed, but there is no honesty in what Mark Steyn says about “the Islamization of Europe.” Take the idea that Jews have been on the “receiving end” of Muslim violence in Europe, as though Jews have been its first and worst victims. Steyn himself knows that this is a lie:

In the current issue of the Mark Steyn Club newsletter, The Clubbable Steyn, I recount my visit to Rotherham to meet some of those “raped and exploited white girls”. Actually, I’m not sure the general term “raped and exploited” quite covers the particular horrors inflicted on them — urinated on by groups of Muslim men, dangled over balconies, doused in petrol as their tormentors danced around them with cigarette lighters, etc. (The Mood Music of Mohammed, SteynOnline, 28th August 2017)

Not a Jewish place

How many of those “raped and exploited” girls are Jewish? Apparently none whatsoever. To paraphrase the Jewish Chronicle: Rotherham is not a Jewish place. Nor is Rotherham unique: Muslims have been committing similar crimes all over Western Europe for decades. They have also been beating, murdering and ethnically cleansing ordinary European Whites for decades. And consuming the taxes of ordinary European Whites through their welfare-dependency and their demands on public health services. The European media recently had a feel-good story about “seven-year-old Hassan,” a boy saved by new medical techniques after “losing 80 per cent of his skin to a rare genetic condition.”

The stories did not discuss the enormous cost of the new techniques, but did disclose these facts: a) the boy was “born in Syria, but now living in Germany”; b) owed his condition to “faulty genes inherited from one or both parents.” In other words, ordinary Germans are paying for problems caused by Muslim inbreeding, which is common in Syria. Genetic diseases that are “rare” among outbred Whites are not rare among inbred Muslims. But are Jews on the “receiving end” of the bill for sick Muslims like little Hassan? No, if Germany is anything like Britain, it’s entirely possible that they make a profit instead: “It’s a little known fact that over 20 per cent of the medicines that the [British] NHS [National Health Service] uses come from Teva, an Israeli company, and it’s rising, heading towards 25 per cent.”

Rejecting repatriation

But Steyn’s big lie about who suffers from Islamization by no means exhausts his dishonesty. Take his claim that “Holocaust guilt” explains Muslim immigration into Europe. Britain was at war with Nazi Germany before the Holocaust began and was a devastated nation by the war’s end. Ordinary Britons rightly felt that they had paid an enormous price to help defeat the Nazis. I can assure Mark Steyn that they felt absolutely no guilt over Nazi crimes.

And how did those ordinary Britons react when mass immigration began after the war? With anger and hostility. They did not want their country invaded, as Britain’s political elite were perfectly aware. In 2013 Roy Hattersley, a former Deputy Leader of the Labour party, asked a damning question in the Guardian: “Should I, in 1964, have called for what a clear majority of my constituents, and most of the country, undoubtedly wanted — the repatriation of all Commonwealth immigrants?” His answer was firmly negative. After all, why should proles have any say in what happens to their neighbourhoods, their country and their children’s future?

MacShane’s myopia

It is no coincidence that Hattersley has a Jewish wife, a literary agent called Maggie Pearlstine who has overseen his profitable literary career. His pro-immigration, pro-minority views are taken from the hostile Jewish elite, not from the working-class he pretended to serve in parliament. Those views are shared by Denis MacShane (né Matyjaszek), the Labour MP and bon vivant who represented Rotherham while White working-class girls were, in Mark Steyn’s words, being “urinated on by groups of Muslim men, dangled over balconies, doused in petrol as their tormentors danced around them with cigarette lighters, etc.”

Despite his passionate commitment to feminism and child-welfare, MacShane entirely failed to spot what was happening in his “wonderful constituency of Rotherham.” Why the failure? Well, he was too busy fighting fascism, chairing the “All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism,” and otherwise being, as the Jewish Chronicle put it, one of the Jewish community’s “greatest champions.”

MacShane was jailed in 2013 after he committed fraud to fund his campaigning on behalf of Jews in Europe. I can assure Mark Steyn that if Jews felt that Muslim immigration was bad for Jews, then MacShane would have opposed said immigration long, loud and often. He didn’t. Quite the reverse: he was part of a Labour government that massively and clandestinely increased Muslim immigration. And guess what? The immigration minister who oversaw that massive increase was one Barbara Roche, a Jewish SJW who “entered politics — she still emphasises this today — to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” Perhaps Mark Steyn missed the huge publicity given to Roche’s Islamophilia at the beginning of 2016:

Islamophile Barbara Roche
Islamophile Barbara Roche

‘It was clear Roche wanted more immigrants to come to Britain,’ recalled Stephen Boys-Smith, the new head of the immigration directorate. ‘She didn’t see her job as controlling entry, but by looking at the wider picture “in a holistic way” she wanted us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.’ Jack Straw [the part-Jewish Home Secretary] never openly contradicted Roche — it simply wasn’t worth the risk of alienating the Labour Party. So she set to work on a speech, in which she outlined the advantages of reducing controls to immigration and portrayed asylum seekers as skilled labour. She didn’t discuss what she was going to say with Straw. …

‘Well done, Barbara,’ Blair told Roche soon [after the speech]. Despite its controversial content, her speech passed relatively unnoticed. But migrants quickly grasped its importance and passed the news on to their friends and family across the world. Labour was letting more people in, they told them, and — unlike other European countries — Britain would provide benefits and state housing. …

One of Roche’s legacies was hundreds more migrants camped in squalor in Sangatte, outside Calais, where they tried to smuggle themselves onto lorries. News about the new liberalism — and in particular the welfare benefits — now began attracting Somalis who’d previously settled in other EU countries. Although there was no historic or cultural link between Somalia and Britain, more than 200,000 came. Since most were untrained and would be dependent on welfare, the Home Office could have refused them entry. But they were granted ‘exceptional leave to remain’. [Et cetera ad nauseam] (Conman Blair’s cynical conspiracy to deceive the British people and let in 2million migrants against the rules, The Daily Mail, 26th February 2016)

I assume that Mark Steyn is aware that Somalis are Muslim. A British journalist called Rod Liddle certainly is. In 2009, he was widely condemned for writing that “many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence.” The title of his piece was “Muslim savages update.”

Like Steyn and my late father, Liddle is another big fan of Jews and big opponent of Muslims. Apparently he too failed to spot Barbara Roche’s Islamophilia.

Friends of Islam in Ireland and Norway

The Islamophilia was shared by an immigration minister in Britain’s close neighbour Ireland. The minister was called Alan Shatter and this is how his departure from office was covered by the blogger Irish Savant:

Islamophile Alan Shatter
Islamophile Alan Shatter

If you read [Shatter’s] valedictory address you’ll find it hard to believe his brief was (cough) Justice and Defence. Because most of the address is given over to his ‘achievement’ in granting Irish (and hence EU) citizenship to a motley collection of 68,000 Third Worlders (=1.5% of the Irish population) in the 28 months he’s been in office. Prior to that the annual average was just a couple of hundred.

So even his attenuated period in office will enable him to look back with satisfaction at the scale of his nation-wrecking. But this is somewhat offset by the glorious own-goal he scored in relation to the public’s perception of Jews generally. Because it’s fair to say he came to be universally loathed for, among other things, his overweening arrogance and willingness to throw everybody and anybody under the bus to save his own skin. To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, even his own friends hated him. (“Rejoice! The rat departs,” The Irish Savant, 7th May 2014)

Fancy that: just like the Islamophile Barbara Roche, the Islamophile Alan Shatter was Jewish. Irish Savant has also chronicled another Islamophile in one of Britain’s neighbours:

Islamophile Erwin Kohn
Islamophile Erwin Kohn

Meet Erwin Kohn, President of the Jewish Community in Norway and also — and you’ll be surprised by this — Deputy Director of the Norwegian Centre Against Racism. Erwin is a busy boy. In this interview you can hear him say: “Norwegian society is too homogeneous, too white. So there is a job to be done.” And we all know the nature of that job, don’t we, children? Erwin shakes his head wearily. But at least money isn’t a problem. “We have generous funding,” he assures the interviewer. And who provides this funding? Why, it’s the Norwegian Government. You know, the ones sworn to represent the very people being blended out by Kohn’s project.

But despite the size of the task, much good work has already been undertaken. Most of eastern Oslo has by now been enriched beyond recognition by New Norwegians from Pakistan, Somalia and Nigeria. With generous helpings of Iraqis, Kosovars and Albanians. Why, Mohammed is now the most popular boy’s name in Oslo, the nation’s capital. Mind you this has not been an unmixed blessing, not least because an epidemic of rape has coincided with the arrival of the New Norwegians. And the police report that every single rape in Oslo over a recent five year period was attributable to an enricher. Every single one. … As for you Kohn, you despicable back-stabbing nation-wrecking ingrate, I hope that one day you roast in the Seventh Circle of Hell along with your fellow-travelling fifth columnists such as Alan Shatter,Barbara Lerner Specter and Anetta Kahane. (“Norway’s Alan Shatter,” The Irish Savant, 24th March 2015)

Islamophile Anetta Kahane
Islamophile Anetta Kahane

Barbara Lerner Spectre and Anetta Kahane are Jewish Islamophiles who have facilitated Muslim immigration into Sweden and Germany, respectively. And it’s the same story in every other Western nation. Wherever you find Muslim immigration, you will find Jews facilitating the immigration, suppressing White resistance to it, and profiting from ever-increasing demand for housing, food and medical services.

Islamophobes and airheads

But Mark Steyn has apparently missed all of this. According to him, Jews have played no part in the “Islamization” of the West, being the helpless, hapless and voiceless victims of White European stupidity. Steyn’s readers accept his lies without question. Indeed, some of them go even further than Steyn does: White Europeans haven’t merely been stupid, but actively malevolent in opening Europe’s borders to Muslims. Here are two responses to Steyn’s “Wicked Muslims, Poor Jews!” nonsense:

Edmond Watson • Nov 15, 2017 at 13:09

“The principal beneficiaries…turned out to be the Muslims — with the Jews on the receiving end, yet again.” Makes one suspicious that the deference to Muslims is actually another way for anti-semites to persecute.

Owen Morgan • Nov 15, 2017 at 14:25

I don’t think there is any doubt about it. Britain’s Labour Party is desperate to claim the muslim vote and will indulge almost any amount of anti-Semitism. Even when the offence is so extreme as to incur a mealy-mouthed reprimand, the guilty individual is at most suspended and then allowed back, after a perfunctory and formulaic “apology”. The Liberal Democrats also have persistent offenders.

The Conservatives have less of a problem with anti-Semitism, but they certainly are guilty of appeasement of muslims, one notorious instance being the elevation of failed Parliamentary candidate (and weapons-grade airhead) Sayeeda Warsi to the House of Lords and her appointment to chair the Conservative Party. Despite her manifest unsuitability, she was maintained in the job for two years and was then given a ministerial post for nearly two years more. (Comments on Butcher Bob Out of His Job?, SteynOnline, 15th November 2017)

“Owen Morgan” (a suspiciously goyish name) doesn’t mention that the “weapons-grade airhead” Sayeeda Warsi was in fact a co-chair of the Conservative Party with Lord Feldman, who is Jewish and oversaw the ascent of the part-Jewish David Cameron to the premiership. Both men were, of course, members of Conservative Friends of Israel, which has been described by the Jewish Chronicle as “the biggest lobbying group in Westminster.”

In other words, Sayeeda Warsi’s ascent to high office wasn’t “appeasement of Muslims”: it was a way to ensure that the top of the Conservative party was less White, less male and less Christian. The same is true of Priti Patel, the Hindu shabbos-shiksa who shilled for Israel until her Jewish controller Lord Polak “got too cocky for his own good.”

Islamization is a Jewish project

Britain is not a democracy: it is an oligarchy. The most influential component of this oligarchy is Jewish, and if Jews opposed Third World immigration it would not be happening. That is why mass immigration by Muslims and other Third Worlders has taken place here decade after decade despite being opposed by “most of the country,” as the traitorous philosemite Roy Hattersley put it. The Islamization of Europe is a Jewish project. If Mark Steyn truly opposed Islamization, then he would, like Melanie Phillips, criticize Jewish support for it. Instead, he resorts to what Orwell called doublethink, or “the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”

On the one hand, Steyn claims that Jews are “on the receiving end” of Islamization. On the other hand, he has met those who have genuinely been on the receiving end: the “raped and exploited white girls” of Rotherham, not one of whom has ever been reported to be Jewish. In short, Mark Steyn is a liar and a confidence-trickster. Some years ago, as Larry Auster noted with horror, there was an unmistakable note of gloating in what Steyn wrote about Islamization:

Some of us think an Islamic Europe will be easier for America to deal with than the present Europe of cynical, wily, duplicitous pseudo-allies. But getting there is certain to be messy, and violent.

Until the shape of the new Europe begins to emerge, there’s no point picking fights with the terminally ill. The old Europe is dying, and Mr. Bush did the diplomatic equivalent of the Oscar night lifetime-achievement tribute at which the current stars salute a once glamorous old-timer whose fading aura is no threat to them. The 21st century is being built elsewhere. (U.S. can sit back and watch Europe implode, Jewish World Review, 28th February 2005)

An anonymous commenter at the London Spectator once gloated even more explicitly, if less elegantly. The author, who calls himself “voidist” writes:

the swedes have been itching like the Germans to have an islamic, jew hating Country….the more islamists you have the more difficult it is for the jews to live in that Country…in Malmo swedes and arabs combined together to haunt and terrorise jewish residents…most of malmo is now jew-free…. unfortunately for the swedes , thier anti-semitism has now back fired…it seems thier arab Brothers have an own Agenda…….and i have booked myself a ringside seat and ordered some Popcorn…who said that the Karma wheel is defunct ? (The Spectator no longer allows links to its comments)

It is ludicrous to suggest, as “voidist” does, that Sweden has imported Muslims to harm its Jewish minority. Muslim immigration there has had the enthusiastic support of Jews based in Sweden like Barbara Lerner Specter and Peter Wolodarski. Accordingly, I suspect that “voidist” is both Jewish and expressing a characteristically warped, deceptive or self-deceptive Jewish psychology. There are certainly many Jews who simultaneously deny any Jewish role in the Islamization of Europe, believe that Jews are suffering first and worst from it, and gloat over the way in which it is harming White Europeans.

Islamophile Peter Wolodarski
Islamophile Peter Wolodarski

In any case, not only are many of the major figures promoting Third World immigration to Europe Jewish as discussed here, there is not one Jewish organization that I am aware of (and yes, Jewish organizations are lavishly funded and highly influential) that does not welcome this invasion.

Mark Steyn is the cheerleader and champion of the gloaters and reality-deniers. His undoubted intelligence and literary talent make him more culpable, not less. Instead of serving the truth, he has served the Tribe. And it is long past time for him to admit his errors and change his ways.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 273 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Let me guess, your father was in a “Jews first” (Romans 1:16) cult that worshiped a “King of Israel” (John 1:49) and pledged allegiance to a foreign “Holy” land (Rev. 21:2). Christians are Jew-addled traitors.

  2. @Hank Rearden:
    Not all Christians are “Jew-addled traitors”.
    As for Tobias Langdon’s wish that Steyn “admit his errors and change his ways”, I hope Langdon isn’t holding his breath.

  3. biz says:

    So let me see if I understand: Some Jews support Islamic immigration to Europe. Others, like Phillips, don’t. Jews are sometimes the victims of Islamic extremism (Malmo, Toulouse), but sometimes non-Jews are. Ok, got it. Profound.

  4. Malla says:

    Jews for some reason have this genocidal desire to see the White race bred out of existence and to have no pure White nation left on this world. Some kind of strange hatred.

    And besides that, Jews have attempted using Muslims as weapons against Europe in the past. This is old story. Check this out about how 12000 Moors could defeat 100000 Visigoths of Iberia. They had inside help.

    https://ia802702.us.archive.org/17/items/ThePlotAgainstTheChurch_192/PlotAgainstTheCurchComplete.pdf

    In Page 315, we read “Marcelino Menendez Pelayo, the renowned Spanish historian of the previous century, writes concerning the treachery of the Jews: “The indigenous population would have been able to show resistance to the handful of Arabs who crossed the Straits, but Witiza had disarmed them, levelled the towers to the ground and had the lances turned into harrows.”125 While the Visigoth kingdom disarmed under the influence of the Jewish advisors and friends of Witiza, dismantled its defence and destroyed its war power, the Jews encouraged the Musulmans to fall upon the Christian kingdom and to destroy it. Great preparations were made in North Africa for this. Into the land which the Jews wished to destroy they introduced pacifism, and into the land which should serve them as a tool to destroy the other, a warlike spirit. These classical tactics the Jews have applied in the course of centuries in different states and use them today with a perfection, in which they have attained experience in the course of centuries. ”

    So those they want to destroy they preach them pacifism (Whites told to accept a brown multicultural multiracial Sharia future, Islamophobia) and those they want to use as destroyers, they preach war (Wahabism, Marxist hatred for Whites ). History repeating itself.

    There are theories that Islam itself was was started by the ancestors of the Zionists to use Arabs as a tool to destroy the Aryan Persian and Byzantine Empires.

    http://thechristiansolution.com/tcs_book/SupportDocs_TCS/TCS158.htm

    http://www.thechristiansolution.com/Exilarch.html

    https://exposingthelieofislam.wordpress.com/the-truth-about-the-origins-and-spread-of-islam-how-the-jews-developed-the-program-of-islam-to-invade-and-destroy-the-east/

    Islam as a Jewish psy ops meant primarily to destroy Aryans, but it went wrong and now has a life of it’s own. The earliest Muslim Arabs realized the treachery of the Jews and thus many were killed in Medina and the Arabs wrote in warnings about Jews in Islamic literature.

    • Agree: polskijoe
    • Replies: @Heros
    , @polaco
    , @DaveE
  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    So let me see if I understand: Some Jews support Islamic immigration to Europe. Others, like Phillips, don’t. Jews are sometimes the victims of Islamic extremism (Malmo, Toulouse), but sometimes non-Jews are. Ok, got it. Profound.

    So let me see if I understand. If some X support Y and some X

  6. @biz

    So let me see if I understand: Some Jews support Islamic immigration to Europe. Others, like Phillips, don’t. Jews are sometimes the victims of Islamic extremism (Malmo, Toulouse), but sometimes non-Jews are. Ok, got it. Profound.

    So let me see if I understand. If some Germans supported Nazism and some Germans opposed it, then obviously Germans as a whole were neutral with respect to Nazism, because it’s “some” and “some”. Yes? And if some people are struck by lightning and some people aren’t, then the two groups must be equal in size, because it’s “some” and “some”. Yes? In general, if a = b + c, then b must equal c in size, influence, importance, etc.

    Have you patented your revolutionary new system of logic and linguistic analysis?

    • Replies: @jtgw
    , @Wally
  7. Blake says:

    This piece is so vile on so many levels. It’s cause and effect which is causing the refugee problem. Don’t cause chaos in the region and there wouldn’t be people fleeing. And nowhere in Europe are Muslims trying to dispossess the Europeans of their land. You cannot tarbrush an entire community for the behaviour of a few. We don’t blame all Christians for the crimes of a few so it’s double standards.

  8. Jews also support the welfare state. Nobody ever condemns them for that. Certainly not the Jewhawks on Unz.com, (some of whom I suspect may be living off it.)

    But then, Jews themselves never condemn the Germans for inventing the welfare state. Highly suspicious, that.

    Yet nothing killed off the West’s spirit like the State’s stealing the welfare function from the Church.

  9. Can we have neither Jews nor Muslims in the West?

    Let them all go back where they belong to haggle each other to death in the souk, argue whether women are more or less valuable than sheep and goats and blow each other up as they see fit.

    Whites are sick to death of your slimy, conniving, murderous ways. Fuck off and leave us alone.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @MEexpert
  10. Dan Hayes says:

    I am very happy to see that The Irish Savant is cited here.

    Savant has consistently and unequivocally demonstrated how just one individual succeeded in drastically changing the demographics of a country. Of course the culprit Shatter was never held accountable for his misdeeds either by the complacent media or other members of the Irish chattering class.

  11. Might it not be deliverance for Europe if the world’s three great Semitic religions were to wander off back into the desert whence they came, taking their adherents with them?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  12. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Blake

    It’s cause and effect which is causing the refugee problem. Don’t cause chaos in the region and there wouldn’t be people fleeing.

    That is a part of the equation that too many people on the Right won’t face up to.

    Britain today is to a certain extent paying a terrible price for decade after decade of catastrophic foreign policy. Britain really needs to face reality. Britain’s days as a major power are long since over. Stop trying to pretend you’re still a great power. And stop being Washington’s faithful lapdog.

  13. Thomm says:

    So people have a problem with Mark Steyn now?

    A new crank turns up every day.

  14. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    I don’t see Jews as promoting a welfare state. It’s more that they see a diverse country as good for the Jews. And are concerned with homogeneity as being an inherent danger (bad for the Jews). Obviously it causes trouble for the majority population who should allow limited immigration of their choice. The Jewish advocates of immigration from places that view Western culture as an anathema should be ignored.

    As one who believes that Islamic countries are the best place for Islamic peoples–not the West– I would ask Israel and the EU to work towards the–greater– goal of low Islamic immigration.
    This can only be achieved by safe homelands where they can be true believers in the Koran and its greatness, in perpetuity and hopefully in peace. And remain where they are born.

  15. dfordoom says: • Website

    While there’s no denying the fanatical hatred of the West that motivates many Jews it has to be said that the non-Jewish white European elites have been every bit as enthusiastic about the destruction of European society. It seems to be more a class thing than an ethnic thing. The non-Jewish white European elites loathe and detest ordinary people. They hate them and fear them as much as the Jews do.

    And even in countries such as Australia where Jewish influence is quite minor, the elites are just as determined on national self-destruction.

    But those who are determined to see everything in terms of race are equally determined not to notice class issues.

  16. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Come on Europeans, wake the hell up and put a end to all this PC nonsense, and an end to any kind of immigration which you are vehemently against. White nations for Europeans only.

    As so many have said here and elsewhere, if countries like Japan, etc., can enforce such strict homogeneity, why can’t white European nations?

    Europe should be completely free to wallow in its various manifestations of spiritual loser-hood and godlessness, from their pagan polytheist human worship, to complete rejection. True Monotheism and its promise of salvation does not belong with such people who are so intent on their own racial supremacy and pursuit of worldly glory and hegemony.

    PS:
    If you can also try and end your pillage of other nations resources, including pillage through your current financial order, it will be appreciated.

    Now, get cracking with those Muslim bans.

  17. Wally says: • Website

    “holocaust”, schmolocaust.

    One very profitable Big Lie that’s used to shove all the above crap down your throats.
    Until that scam is confronted for what it is, everyone is just peeing in the wind.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:https://www.historiography-project.com/assets/img/cartoons/house_of_cards.gif” >https://www.historiography-project.com/assets/img/cartoons/house_of_cards.gif’ class=’ximage’ />
    “Some stories are true that never happened.”
    - Elie Wiesel

  18. The Jews almost single-handedly gave the world two of the twentieth century’s most important creations: Communism and Nuclear Weapons. We would certainly have had neither without them. At this time of the year it is important to remind people who the Magi were whose visit to the baby Jesus has been so celebrated in the West. They were Persian, Iranian wise men, Zoroastrian scholars. You see, the Zoroastrians, who were running the major empire of Iran back then, were monotheists. They felt that their own faith was too subtle, intellectual, and complex for many peasants, so they encouraged Jews and Christians to come into their lands and teach the people. In time Islam in Central Asia carried on with this attitude. At the height of Abbasid power around 800 when Rome had a population of around 35,000 and Bagdad’s was around a million, a majority of the population were Christians and Jews. Over time small tax breaks for Muslims shifted most of the population to the mosques. When I traveled in Afghanistan in the 1970s, I was often urged to go along with the other men to prayers when the call came five times a day, and Jewish friends had the same experience.

    This entire attack on the world of Islam has been in the works for decades. Religious Jews fretted in Israel in the 1970s that the secular Jews in America were going to push America to make war on the Muslims, as a substitute for the Communists, whose threat had been justifying massive military expenditures. They said that it was destined to lead the Jewish people into their next big catastrophe, and for the same arrogance as before.

    • Replies: @Anon-og
  19. @Hank Rearden

    Rearden, what in the world are you talking about? Have you been hit in the head with something? Please seek treatment.

    • Agree: Alden
    • LOL: Z-man
    • Replies: @tito
  20. Che Guava says:

    You are so correct.

    I have an old lady friend, married to a Japanese man. She is Jewish, and used to be part of, or connected to a fractious group called ‘For a Multicural Japan’, or something like that. Have known her for a long time, started to avoid her after seeing her with large (seven or eight) groups of African and Moslem women, clearly working to bring them in.

    Now, she is very old, so none of those activities any more, but she lives near my flat, so I see her at times.

    Since she is old (81), I respect that, so occasionally meeting, but she is still annoying, raucous NY jewish accent, almost no Japanese, after 40 or so years.

    I am thinking that is not the digression, just a little anecdote.

    As for Steyn, you have the very accurate diagnosis. In English-language parts of my bookmarks, am listing him in ネオコン (neocon).

    I am enjoying his articles on old U.S. pop culture at times.

    It is not as if he does not know that his free-speech prosecution was in a system set up by jews in Canada, probably many jews on the tribunal or commission, whatever they are calling it.

  21. Wally says: • Website
    @Blake

    Yeah boy, Muslim countries, their lifestyles, & customs have always been wonderful places for all persuasions and indeed, ISIS is very charitable to all Muslims.

    And why aren’t you critical of the very nearby Israel and other Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia for not taking in any of these “refugees”?

  22. Bill Jones says: • Website

    He needs to be dead.

  23. Selvar says:

    That Jewish elites support mass Muslim immigration no more disproves the idea that there are ordinary Jews who are hurt by it than White elites supporting mass immigration disproves the notion that there are ordinary whites who are hurt by it.

    Obviously, the Jewish elites helping set immigration policy are not the ones suffering anti-Semitic attacks. They are overwhelmingly secular and blend into the surrounding population. More devout Jews don’t have that luxury. Regardless, it’s objectively true that a majority Muslim Europe would not be a nice place for Jews.

    • Agree: jtgw
  24. @Blake

    I have no dog in this fight but can’t let flagrantly bad arguments pass. Actually it isn’even clear what you are saying except thar somethung has got you very excited. The reason most Muslims have come to Europe since WW2 is for the money, either earned or in welfare so maybe you have a problem about very recent events and you are actually pointing to the numbers displaced by policies and actions of Israel which have contributed so much to the destructiin of Iraq and Syria???

    You do prompt the thought that decent charitable Jews knowing what Israel has been party to inflicting on Arabs has thought it only an act of compensation to introduce them to the benefits of European welfare states with ageing populations.

  25. @Johnny Smoggins

    If I were setting up a crew of Jewish trolls I would hire you.

  26. Heros says:
    @biz

    “None so blind as those who will not see.”

    That applies to Steyn and you. Derb as well. Its that old canard that “some jews do, but somewhere I can find a jew who doesn’t, therefore if you try to make an correlations you are anti-semite”.

    I was a fan of Steyn’s until the onset of the GFC when Hew Hewitt and Steyn had a free podcast, and then finally I took a hard look at all the true evidence about 9/11. Once I realized that the proof was conclusive that this event, and all the bad shit going down across the planet is being created for the benefit of one small country in general, and one small hidden circle of families which own it, and the entire west. Since then I know that Mark Steyn is a shabbez crypto-jew.

    At this point I have decided that, since any critique of the holocaust is taboo under penalty of imprisonment and financial ruin, the best litmus test to determine if a jew is “woke” is this:

    Are you denier of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”?

    If they try to shut you down by claims of “Russian Forgery” or “Anti-Semite” that is all you need to know.

    So, biz, do you deny the protocols?

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  27. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Amazing article. Bravo.

  28. Heros says:
    @Malla

    Excellent post and great links, Malla, thank you.

    Everything we have been taught for generations is little more than a kosher mirage. The people are so brainwashed that even though they have this once in a civilization chance to finally learn the truth, they refuse to even look because believing anything branded “conspiracy theory” disrupts their programming and causes anxiety. The truth was available on the Internet ancien, but that is crumbling before our eyes.

  29. MEexpert says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    Let them all go back where they belong to haggle each other to death in the souk, argue whether women are more or less valuable than sheep and goats and blow each other up as they see fit.

    Why single out poor Jews and Muslims? Let everyone go back to wherever they came from. Give the place back to native Indians.

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @Johnny Smoggins
  30. Wow, a story with no protagonist, only a collection of antagonists. Not sure how to process this.

  31. The always obvious answer is

    Even the Hitler plan (supposedly) to create a isolated and fixed country for jewies look like soft near to complete lack of scruples this people in very disproportionate levels “have”.

    Right now MOST of them are firmly working to ELIMINATE from earth and via very malevolent and subtle ways white people… Exploiting in the most cynical and psychopathic ways the kindness of many white gentile subgroups.

    And so called alt right and trumpets instead try to creates a ideological reconciliation, they are increasing this divisions in highest levels, and for sure the core of alt right undoubtedly is jewy and shekel gentile boys and gals.

    White people are losing because

    They are never a “white people”, a brotherhood but a overlapping chains of hierarchical and rigid divisions (social, sub racial, cultural/psychological);

    They, as a extemporal collectivity, never had a decent past, considerably because their seems incurable internal divisions within and among nations;

    They on avg always suffered with moral issues, and Christianity has been a huge role on this, also to divide Europeans in different ideological fronts. Morally idiotic and insufficient people are easily corrupted and/or deceived;

    Moral blind or partial moral myopia also is strongly connected with intellectual capacity because it show our judgement skills.

    The European (and derived or diaspora) is very complicated and just the even existence of such evil people as jewies with all their extreme materialism and absolute lack of moral scruples with those who are not on the tribe, show how wisely inefficient European peoples has been to solve most of their historical moral problems.

    “the European situation is very complicated”

  32. Roberto says:

    Like Ed Koch used to say, “There are far more white people on welfare than there are black people.”

    Seems Ed considered the Satmar to be white.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satmar_(Hasidic_dynasty)

  33. @biz

    Indeed after superficial reading, that could well be the lazy and simplistic conclusion, that goes as follows:

    Individual Jews may be either liberal or conservative. It is because they “naturally” gain access to politically and intelectually influential positions, due to high IQs and supposed genetic superiority, that it is normal to see them, as any other liberal or conservative influencer, do what influencers do. In other words, move along, nothing to see here.

    But this view is challenged when you take a look at the facts. Therefore, after a bit of research one is likely to end up asking some of the following questions:

    Why 67% of American Jews – average Jews – support immigration reform – and being immigration reform an euphemism for amnesty and more chain migration mechanisms – for more mass immigration from third world and developing countries?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/04/why-immigration-reform-is-a-jewish-issue/430806/

    1) Why Jewish leaders and influencers almost unanimously support and lobby for mass immigration knowing as they do most of it is comming mainly from developing and third world countries?

    https://forward.com/news/179296/jews-unite-behind-push-for-immigration-reform/

    http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/maram-stern-closing-europes-borders-is-not-the-solution-to-the-refugee-crisis-showing-solidarity-is-9-3-2015

    http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/refugee-crisis-hungarian-jews-pledge-support-for-refugees-reject-any-comparison-with-holocaust-9-0-2015

    https://www.adl.org/news/article/welcoming-the-stranger-adls-commitment-to-protecting-refugees

    https://www.adl.org/education/educator-resources/lesson-plans/we-were-strangers-too-learning-about-refugees-through-art

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-life-and-religion/243801/teaching-kids-about-refugees

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-life-and-religion/216190/explain-refugee-crisis-to-kids

    2) Why, and I quote, the Jewish community has made it clear that opening America’s doors to Syrian refugees is one of its defining priorities?

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/218925/helping-anti-semites-immigrate

    3) Is it a Jewish cultural and religious issue? historic perhaps?

    http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1898474/jewish/A-Torah-Perspective-on-National-Borders-and-Illegal-Immigration.htm

    http://www.aish.com/ci/be/95296369.html?tab=y

    https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/u-s-election-2016/1.754644

    http://www.centralreformtemple.org/event/torah-study-strangers-in-a-strange-land-jewish-views-on-immigration/

    https://reformjudaism.org/blog/2017/01/31/reform-jews-stand-our-immigrant-friends-and-allies

    4) Why aren’t there more articles in tabletmag, Forward, World Jewish Congress and the ADL condemning the passivity of Israel towards the refugee crisis, and lobbying to get Israel opening his borders to all refugees?

    5) Why all influencers, the ones publicly criticising Islam and Western acceptance of mass immigration that is, such as Sam Harris, Gad Saad, Mark Steyn, Pamela Geller, Dave Rubin of the Rubin Report, Ezra Levant of the Rebel Media, the Gatestone Institute shills, Bill Maher, Douglas Murray and the rest of a long list, which by the way, is mostly composed of Jews, do not acknowlede and condenm the Jewish organizations, leaders and influencers from Jewish owned MSM for their role in the lobbying of Western governments and manipulating public opinion to get them to accept more refugees?

    Now, you can play dumb, dance around the issue, cry anti-semitism and play the victim so much you want, as you and your ilk (and I mean intellectually dishonest Jews, make no mistake) have done for so many centuries.

    But the fact remains that the organized Jewish community, its leaders and influencers are almost unanimously lobbying for more third world mass immigration, and the ones opposing it fail to acknowledge the role played by said actors, perhaps because they are part of their tribe.

    This lack of honesty and double standards on the one hand, and the lobbying for mass immigration on the other – so detrimental for the citizens of Europe and the US because it will convert, bit by bit, Western countries into developing ones like Brazil or Colombia, will no doubt be the source of future real and understandable anti-semitism, and of course by that time fools like yourself will again play victim and cry anti-semitism, and feel once more persecuted because of “envy”, as has been the narrative for centuries.

    • Replies: @jtgw
    , @Ernest Money
  34. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Glad someone brought this point up. Jews are on another level with their deceit and wish to cause harm to those who would like nothing more than to help them.

    You mentioned that none of the girls in Rotterdam who were victimized were Jewish. What does this remind you of? It reminds you of the Hollywood scandals that are happening now. The vast majority of victimized women are gentle women, not Jews.

    Also worth mentioning is that in the case of Gymnast coach Nasser who molested a Jewish woman, he received a 60 year sentence. Meanwhile scum like Weinstein are still free.

  35. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    A well researched article by Mr. Langdon, but he forgot the #1 rule when it comes to MSM stories; If something good has happened, then the article must mention how superior Jewish intelligence or charity helped bring about this benefit to humanity and if something bad/terrible happened, no matter to whom, then the article must mention something about how this fuels anti-Semitism and brings back the dark days of WW II, a unique war in that only Jews suffered and died, as GOYIM suffering, death and sacrifice doesn’t count.

    BTW, how many ‘Gingers’ are actually Jews? Red hair is NOT a Semitic trait.

    • Replies: @polskijoe
  36. If like most elites you grow up in a large city half your fellow elites are jews, they look pretty white and they are smart and funny and seem pretty nice in a lot of way. You have been raised in the post war holocaust narrative so you overlook certain biases they have like uniformly leftist politics and a defensiveness.Also if there is an elders of zion cabal they are not all in on it so you note some differences and brush off conspiracy theories.In short its really hard to be a white cog elite and not be set up to trust jews implicitly. Even if after decades you notice things you still chalk it up to paranoia post WW2.Antisemitism like all “racism” is perceived as such a low brow thing you might as well go around talking about NASCAR. Even anti black brown racism is allowed in elite circles if presented properly, at least it was until about the current year. but anti semitism since at least the 40s has been a sure mark of low breeding an an intellectual inability to overcome that breeding.And lets not forget its hard to find an area of elite culture where jews either dominate or have a substantial presence so even if you refuse to believe you know you better keep your thought s to yourself. Additionally even if one were pretty conservative, there was history on the side of leftism things like slavery and jim crow really seemed a reasonable thing to want to abolish mullticulturalism to the extent it already existed in the late 50s seemed reasonable to make the best of it.Very few whites saw how much immigration was really happening until it was too late. for decades it was only in cities that were always fairly multicultural, as it seeped into other areas everyone thought it was an anomaly in their area by the time we understood it was too late,At that point the neocucks helped by jews sold a lot of conservatives on the idea that it was both free market and that hispanics were christian conservatives. now you get the newest generation who on some levels get how bad an idea it was but subconsciously understand to undo it will take a civil war with racial undertones and so resign themselves to it in hopes it will be ok. The author is correct some jews might as well be elders of zion because they act exactly like that. most of the rest are simply tribalist that follow leftism and the is it good for the jews theory of politics. They think multiculturalism is good for the jews. And so far its been very good for the jews and will continue to be unless whites reverse it or jews lose control to the browns. what they cant see is themselves, and how this is it good for the jews in adopted lands is what always leads to lets get rid of the jews. They like drunks who say you’d drink too if you had my problems.
    Well this is unstoppable and unsustainable whites will either be enslaved and destroyed or they will wake up and fight.My guess is it isnt different this time that while whites have certain traits that make us susceptible to this sort of con in the end we are lifeforms with the same primal instincts to survive and we will rise up and throw the jews and browns out. I dont jews will ever be trusted again after WW2 betraying america will be seen as the last straw

  37. Jake says:

    Of course the majority of Jews, and vast majority of Jewish cultural elites, want Moslem immigration into the West by the tens of millions. How else can they have the foot soldiers necessary to utterly exterminate any possibility of the rebirth of Christendom? And that animus must necessarily drive Jews as a group. Jews have chosen anti-Christ, which means Jews also must war against the peoples of Christendom.

    That means Jews in the main must be anti-white, anti-European, in cultural terms.

    Especially as this article focuses on the Jewish centrality to the Moslem problem from a British perspective, I must stress that being white and anti-Christ makes a man no better than a Jew in this regard, no matter how sincerely he works to try to save white majority countries. Modern atheists and agnostics and unitarians and universalists, seen rise so powerfully in the Anglo-Saxon and Continental Germanic worlds since the second generation of Protestant revolutionary fervor, are essentially on the side of the Jews in the original kulturkampf. Which is the source of culture war today.

    Pro-Jewish John Derbyshire is a prime way to start to get a handle on that.

    WASP culture was born of a Judaizing heresy: Anglo-Saxon Puritanism. A Judiazing heresy necessarily produces pro-Jewish politics and culture. Indeed, archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell allied with Jews specifically to borrow Jewish money in order to wage wars against non-WASP white Christians.

    The above is the heart soul, the very essence, of WASP culture. WASP Elites always will end up allied with Jews against the vast majority of white Christians.

    Ditto Continental Germanic Elites once they recreate their nations as Modern secular states that were to replace even the hope of a revived Christendom.

    For white people, it is Christ and Christendom or chaos.

    • Agree: Intelligent Dasein
    • Replies: @jtgw
    , @attilathehen
    , @polskijoe
  38. America is the hegemon in the West, while European states are its vassals. Washington and London are ruled and controlled by industrious and powerful Jewish financiers. Reality is a hard bitch to swallow, but there is no way back. The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must. All else is for naught.

  39. Pericles says:

    So David Cameron (part Jew) and Nicholas Sarkozy (part Jew) and Hillary Clinton (whatever pays the bills) for some reason went to war with Libya, which got rid of an enemy of Israel and has been a bleeding wound in the side of Europe ever since. Coincidence!

  40. Tobias, if you don’t like Steyn just say so. To try and weave so many disparate tales just makes for a mess that makes you look like a crybaby momma’s boy. Just repeat- I don’t like Mark Steyn – for the required length of an article and leave it at that. Leave geo-political analysis for those who actually have some insight.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  41. geokat62 says:

    Although I previously posted this comment on another thread, it seems appropriate to repost it here:

    [MORE]

    If you enjoyed the Red Ice interview of Prof. Kevin MacDonald, you’re gonna Iove this interview with Swedish journalist, Ingrid Carlqvist. It’s called Scandal in Sweden When Ingrid Questions the Unquestionable

    Here’s the promo for the video:

    Ingrid [Carlqvist] returns to Red Ice to discuss her experience as a journalist telling unpopular truths in Sweden. To begin, she tells us about how she set out to understand why Sweden had become multicultural. Ingrid quickly realized that it is nearly impossible to discuss Jewish influence, as most people – even those critical of Islam – are unwilling to venture into such controversial waters. We then discuss Barbara Spectre, an influential American Jew in Sweden who has called for the end of European civilization through mass immigration from the third world. Later, we discuss Holocaust revisionism, and how Ingrid’s willingness to question – not deny – this historical event has affected her journalism career.

    For those who don’t have the time to watch the full video, I’ve reproduced what I think was the most pertinent exchange of the interview. It occurs at 46:23:

    Henrik Palmgren – … for the sake of really knowing this guilt cloud that’s held over us today, that as soon as we begin to organize as an ethnic group, but have interests… supposedly that always turns into some holocaust, right. So, we have to be able to question this, shouldn’t we?

    Ingrid Carlqvist – Of course, and that’s why I think… I mean many people tell me “why do you want to dig into the holocaust… it is so many years ago… it doesn’t matter today… just leave it alone. If there was something wrong about the story, just leave it alone… it doesn’t matter.” But I think it does matter, because everything we do today, if we, as you said, if we try to organize ourselves. If we say that “I’m Sweden, I’m proud to be a Swede, I love my country, Sweden is the country of the Swedes, and I want us to take our country back.” Then I will always hear, “Oh, so you want another holocaust? Is that what you want? You are a nazi. Everyone who is a patriot, a nationalist, is a nazi. And that leads to one thing: to gas the Jews.”

    So, that’s why I do think it’s important, even if it was so many years ago. It is important, because every time you try to say “I love my country,” then they always come “the holocaust.”

    I was so intrigued by this video that I decided to do a little more digging about the origins of Swedish multiculturalism and came across the following articles:

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/09/23/the-origins-of-swedish-multiculturalism/

    https://redice.tv/news/how-and-why-sweden-became-multicultural

    The second link is a review of a very brief book, How Sweden Became Multicultural: The Hidden Agenda, The Process, The Lobbyists

    The review piqued my curiosity so much that I decided to buy the book. And much to my surprise, it was worth every penny.

    Here are some of the most revealing quotes from the Preface:

    The purpose of this text is to educate the reader on the key events that caused Sweden to transform into a multicultural society, the people responsible for this development, and their motives. When I am talking about the transformation of Sweden into a multicultural country I am referring to a political decision in 1975, which proclaimed that Sweden was a multicultural country. The stated reasons for allowing large-scale immigration of foreign ethnic groups, and the consequences that followed, are not going to be the focus of this book. However, Sweden self-identifying as a multicultural country was undoubtedly an important factor.

    In some parts of the text I also claim that the implementation of multiculturalism is (and was) contrary to Swedish ethnic interests. As is made clear in this text it was predominantly individuals from certain ethnic minorities who lobbied for Sweden to become multicultural. These individuals had a strong ethnic identity and saw their interests threatened by a culturally homogenous Sweden. The implementation of multiculturalism was thus a way for these ethnic activists to advance their respective groups’ interests, which to some extent occurred at the expense of Swedish ethnic interests…

    Considering how frequently [Multiculturalism] is used to describe modern-day Sweden remarkably few people know how Sweden became multicultural. As recently as the mid-60s the term didn’t even exist, and the implementation of multiculturalism was hardly considered a government priority. In 1975, less than 30 years ago at the time of writing, this radically changed following a resolution in parliament which stated that Sweden was no longer a nation dominated by Swedish culture, but rather a culturally pluralist society where different minority cultures were going to be allowed to thrive.

    This decision was made very quickly. To make a long story short a series of newspaper debates that began in 1964 got the ball rolling. Some debaters demanded that minorities in the country should be allowed to maintain and promote their ethnic identity, while others advocated for minority assimilation. In conjunction with the newspaper debates certain minorities started to increase the pressure on politicians to get their ethnic interests met. The debates also made immigration and minority-related questions political questions, something that was unheard of previously.

    In 1967 the Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) sent a bill, which originated in the Social-Democratic Culture Workers Association (KSF), to the government demanding that they change public policy related to immigration and minorities. This in turn led to the 1968 formation of the Immigrant Investigation (IU) that was tasked with investigating the status of minorities who had immigrated to Sweden. It was to a large degree inspired by those who argued for cultural pluralism in the aforementioned newspaper debates. In 1974 IU put forth a proposal based on the slogans “equality, freedom of choice, and co-operation”, which in practice meant that Sweden would pursue diversity instead of cultural homogeneity. This is precisely what happened in 1975 when the parliament unanimously passed proposal 1975: 26 based on IU’s final conclusion.

    To gain a better understanding of the fundamental change Swedish politics and society has undergone we must acquaint ourselves with the newspaper debates that began in 1964. It’s also important that we understand the man who was at the centre of the process that transformed Sweden. His name was David Schwarz*, the father of Swedish multiculturalism.

    * David Schwarz came from a Jewish family and was born in Poland in 1928. During the Second World War he was interned in four different concentration camps: Buchenwald, Nordhausen, Dora, and Bergen-Belsen. Like many other concentration camp interns he suffered from typhus and tuberculosis but Schwarz was luckier than many others and was placed in a sanatorium in Germany and later Italy where he resided until 1950. When the Italian sanatorium closed Schwarz was sent to Sweden where he was treated at various facilities until 1954.

    And here’s an excerpt (from the chapter on Ethnic Dimension) that delves into the origins of multiculturalism in other countries, especially Australia:

    The Jewish commitment to multiculturalism in Sweden is not a unique phenomenon. For example, in a comparative study of multiculturalism in the USA and Germany, Hornung notes that Jews were the leading elements behind the implementation of multiculturalism in both countries and he mentions Horace Kallen and Daniel Cohn-Bendit as the ideological fathers of multiculturalism. Kevin MacDonald has written extensively about the overwhelming and crucial Jewish involvement in the USA’s political transition to multiculturalism.

    In his exhaustive study of how Australia became multicultural in 1978 Lopez identifies Walter Lippmann, leader for the Jewish congregation in Melbourne, as the most influential actor. As early as 1960 Isi Leibler, who for several decades was the leader of Australia’s Jewish congregation and later vice-chairman of the World Jewish Congress, expressed how important it was for Jewish interests that Australia became multicultural in his yearly report to the Jewish congregations board:

    I believe it is essential for Jews to join with other groups in Australia in promoting the philosophy of a pluralistic society which unlike totaIitarianist regimes implies unity in a common end without uniformity in culture, religion, or communal organisation… The Jewish community must be at the forefront and willing to co-operate with elements from left and right who are dedicated to the concept of an open society without which pluralism and a full Jewish life is impossible.

    Leibler is simultaneously a vocal opponent to the implementation of multiculturalism in Israel.

    This is a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country for the Jews.

    This approach underlines how advocacy in favour of multiculturalism in states where Jews are a minority is motivated by a specific ethnically Jewish interest…

    Furthermore, the first politician who brought up multiculturalism as a political issue in Australia was the Jew Malcolm Fraser during his time as the opposition’s spokesperson on Immigration. It was also Fraser who in 1978, during his time as Australia’s Prime Minister, officially declared that the country was multicultural.

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @Anonymous
  42. Meanwhile at Harvard that trains the leaders of the future.

    https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10240

  43. anarchyst says:

    It should be noted that Islam is a form of “arabicized judaism”. Many of the “rules” in the jewish Talmud are virtually identical to the “rules” in the Koran. Both belief system operate with an air of supremacy of each respective “system”–relegating “infidels or goyim” to inferior status, with special “taxes” levied by each respective system, as well as the supremacists in each group being immune from the equivalent of “justice” when wrongdoing is done to the “outsiders”…infidel or goyim…
    Both Islam and Judaism believe in Gods of vengeance, unlike the Christian God of Peace and redemption.
    Read the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran to see for yourself.
    One divergence from similarity is the way Jesus Christ is looked upon…Jews consider Jesus Christ a heretic that is “boiling in excrement for eternity”, conceived by his mother Mary, who is looked upon as a harlot, who consorted with a Roman soldier.
    Contrast that with the Islamic Koran, which regards, Jesus Christ as a great prophet…not the “Son of God”, but a great prophet nevertheless. His mother Mary is specifically mentioned in the Koran and is given a place of high honor.
    Now, which “belief system” is more hostile to Christianity?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  44. Steyn is a cheerleader for the Zionists who control every facet of our government and the banks and the MSM, and who are helping America commit national suicide via the unlimited immigration that is being forced upon America.

    To see what the Zionists have planned for America read THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION.

  45. @Heros

    … 9/11. Once I realized that the proof was conclusive that this event, and all the bad shit going down across the planet is being created for the benefit of one small country in general, and one small hidden circle of families which own it

    Yup, and there are probably less than 500 of them and they’re all behind the curtain, but we all know that talk like that makes us “kunsperraseee theerists.”

    Better keep our heads down, our mouths shut and our crazy thoughts to ourselves, ‘specially cuz we’re “free!”

    Yippeee! And aren’t we great?

    The Izzi-firsters are as stupid as the old Bolshie useful idiots.

  46. http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/09/middleeast/iraq-isis-military-liberated/index.html

    The wonders of border security. Secure borders exclude undocumented soldiers of ISIS that invasively demand to be included into every nation.

  47. tito says: • Website
    @Hank Rearden

    It’s time to admit that once I was a philo-Semite. But then I spent 2 years in NYC and read The New York Times. Now I ache for the resurrection of Adolf Hitler.

    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @Z-man
    , @Lex
  48. jtgw says:
    @Fishbone Ash

    Well, did Langdon produce any evidence that a majority of European Jews favored mass Muslim immigration? For example, he could have cited opinion polls or even looked at voting patterns as a proxy. Instead, we get just a few examples of pro-immigrant politicians who happen to be Jewish or part-Jewish, with no comparison to non-Jewish politicians.

    See here for evidence that European Jews in fact vote more conservatively due to the fears of what Islamization will mean for them.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  49. MBlanc46 says:
    @Blake

    They’re our countries. We can have any standards that we want, double or otherwise. In your country, you can have any standards that you want.

  50. jtgw says:
    @A Liberal Nationalist

    American and European Jews behave quite differently on the immigration issue. Islamization hasn’t really hit America yet, except in some areas like Dearborn, Michigan, so American Jews haven’t yet been smacked in the face with the consequences. European Jews are waking up, however, a few leftie politicians notwithstanding. See this:

    http://www.vdare.com/posts/sailer-why-are-european-jews-to-the-right-of-american-jews

  51. tito says: • Website
    @Bro Methylene

    Hank Rearden – why is that name so familiar to me? From Ayn Rand?

  52. Z-man says:
    @tito

    It’s time to admit that once I was a philo-Semite. But then I spent 2 years in NYC and read The New York Times. Now I ache for the resurrection of Adolf Hitler.

    LOL!!!

    I grew up in NYC so I was never a ‘philo-Semite’! LOL!

  53. J1234 says:

    Not a very good article. The author dissects Steyn’s statements to concoct a one dimensional stance of his subject’s view on what’s happening in Europe. Steyn’s reference to “holocaust guilt” certainly gives some indication of skepticism about the sweeping condemnation of the West by holocaust accusers.

    Steyn is an excellent writer and thinker, and no, I’m not Jewish. Actually, he isn’t either, but he is a little bit by ancestry, and that may ultimately be the problem some folks have with him.

    • Replies: @jtgw
  54. What does the author mean by “theWest”? Islam was brought into Europe essentially by the Ottoman conquest of large chunks of the soute-east of the continent. Some indigenous European ethnic groups converted, such as the modern day Bosnians and Albanians. More recent immigrants are the result of labour shortages after WWII. I don’t really see what the Jews have to do with it. Interestingly, though, Europeans who are hostile to Muslims are usually also hostile to Jews and Europeans who are favourable to Jews are usually also favourable to Jews. Thus, one of the greatest mistakes of Israel’s supporters has been to beleive that, by whipping up hatred of Muslims in Europe, they would increase support for Israel. All that has happened is that by making hatred of Muslims respectable, they have also made hatred of Jews respectable.

  55. Z-man says:

    This guy Steyn denies his ‘Jewness’ all the time especially the way he spells that kikenvermin name of his.
    It’s one of the few disappointments I have about watching Tucker Carlson, who is doing great btw, this ‘crypto’ Zionist is always on that show!
    A pox on all Zionists! They must be defeated!

  56. Mark Steyn is a witty chap whose barbs often hit the target zone. It’s impossible not to appreciate his stylish commentary. But he has a blind spot where Jewish political actions and propaganda are concerned.

    He is at the mercy of the media (e.g., Fox News) that allow him to speak to a mass audience. It’s a rare privilege. Surely he is bright enough to understand that certain ideas are off-limits if he wants to keep his soapbox in the heavily Jewish-saturated news/entertainment industry. A few ill-chosen words that aren’t good for the Jews and he’ll be talking mainly to himself in an obscure corner.

  57. Z-man says:

    BTW, that’s an old photograph of the crypto Joo, he’s older, fatter and more slovenly looking now. (Grin)

  58. Lex says:
    @tito

    And Adolf Hitler ached for extermination or enslavement of hundreds of millions of white gentile people.

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @jacques sheete
  59. @Hank Rearden

    First post from a thread derailing shill. It looks like the Sharia Blue crew has found UNZ review.

    This is a tactic they have been doing to 8chan and 4chan to squelch discussion of issues they don’t want the goyim to consider.

  60. jack ryan says: • Website

    This is sadly true.

    This union of anti White Jews and anti White Muslim immigrants/migrants was best symbolized by the union/marriage of New York’s (NYC Mayor anointed, later texting pervert) Michael Weiner and Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff Saudi Huma Abedin. This might be one of the ugliest political couples in Western civilization’s history:

    - A strong case for birth control there!

    and this anti White union of Muslims and Jews is nothing new. Jews were expelled or put under the Spanish Catholic Inquisition in 1492 in large part for taking the Muslim side against White Spanish Catholics, for doing things like being the Muslims’ tax collectors, selling White girls in to sexual slavery to Middle Eastern Muslim buyers. The jews have always had a bad reputation for leading White slavery, the worst forms of prostitution or now the hard core porn industry.

    Here is the best history article on Spain 15th century – Whites, Muslim Moors and the Jews

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/08/26/spanish-history-lesson-when-jews-took-the-arab-muslim-side-against-white-europeans/

    It’s also reality that it’s pretty much a waste of time for populist, nationalists in the USA or UK, Western Europe to try to form alliances with Arabs/Muslims to be more fair to the Palestinians or to resist the worst forms of the media mafia. Arabs/Muslims are on the anti White side, they want our good things including our girls, women. The wealthiest Arabs/Muslims marry our women like Queen Noir of Jordan. The lower caste, soap and toilet paper avoiding Arabs/Muslims simple attack, defile our women/girls.

    That’s life.

    • Replies: @englishmike
  61. polaco says:
    @Malla

    Jews worked for the Moors as government bureaucrats and tax collectors, oppressing the natives. Even after the Reconquista they kept encouraging Moslems to invade Spain, that’s why they got kicked out of the country eventually.

  62. Wally says: • Website
    @Fishbone Ash

    You’re clinging to impossible, college freshman, Zionist tales about ‘the Nazis’.

    No doubt you try to win every argument by bringing up the fake ’6M Jews & 5M others’.

    fact is:

    The ‘holocaust’ BIG Lie is scientifically impossible.
    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

    Only liars demand censorship.

    • Replies: @Lex
  63. renfro says:
    @MEexpert

    Give the place back to native Indians.

    Not a bad idea.

  64. 7Dwarfs says:

    Good read on this Sunday morning, coffee in hand. Would have been nice to see a chronicled roster of countries in Europe, U.S and Canada and elsewhere naming names of individuals in political arenas that are behind white genocide. It would also be prudent if one continues down this course not only to name names as this will eventually lead to a cold trail. How about expanding on this with evidence of collusion (which is not a crime but an indicator) by the media and financial institutions (ie; Soros foundations ie; Open Societies, Macron’s handlers ie; he was a Sachs boy who entered politics from left stage) And the list might also include the enablers, such as social media tycoon Zuckerberg and his henchmaiden (who looks like his ugly twin) Sherly Sandberg (COO) who are attempting to censor opposition to those opposed to migration. Let’s not forget the main financial underwriters of Facebook; Morgan Stanley, J.P Morgan, Goldman Sachs.
    The list should also include the media empires and their storefront operations such as CNN ‘s Jeff Zucker. The way I see it is this; Individually these individuals, institutions and platforms cannot operate in a functional and determined way that would lead to implementation of their desired goals unless they were a collective. And that is what they are. A tribe out to rule. Those are the rules. It’s like a bee colony. One inkling of a threat and the whole hive of individuals become a force to be reckoned with. It seems that they each know their part to play in this game of domination. Unless we wake up to the gravity of the situation we are doomed. But alas, many are awakening. Pandora is out. The cat is out. Again. As in previous uprisings against this tribe of wickedness history will tell all.

  65. Like it or not the all nations of the world are already trending toward hard core nationalism.
    Why, what is the reason, what factors are in play is more or less irrelevant.
    Is it good or evil?
    Who the hell knows!
    As long as the third world war does not break out, who gives a shit.

  66. Svigor says:

    I produced copious evidence to back my claim, but it didn’t alter my father’s views in the slightest.

    Thinking critically about Jews can get you into trouble. That is the rational basis for a lot of non-Jewish antiantisemitism. Jews are rich, powerful, activist, and vengeful. Most of them have no problems committing or condoning immoral acts in the name of antiantisemitism.

    The trouble is goyische kopfs; Europeans have difficulty believing one thing, and saying or doing another. So they’d rather believe stupid shit, than own their own thinking and pretend to believe stupid shit.

  67. renfro says:
    @geokat62

    Horace Kallen was a Jewish immigrant into the US, he was ‘the father’ of ‘Pluralism’ in the US—-and like all Jewish pushers he at the same time insisted Israel should be Jews Only—-because Jews were special–which is always their claim when their hypocrisy is called out.

  68. Brilliant article! I look forward to more contributions from Langdon.

    Steyn is a contemptible neocon who flacks for Israel’s wars and then–in the finest tradition of chutzpah–tries to play the victim when Moslem hordes flock westward fleeing Zionist wars of aggression.

    BTW, all you zionist shills here claiming that we are ‘painting with a broad brush’ on the subject of the Jews have missed the point entirely. Nobody here is accusing your friendly neighborhood dentist of being an integral part of some worldwide conspiracy. All we are pointing out is that the vast majority of Jews in the West who have real influence and power are usually either zionists, neocons or cultural Marxists–or some combination thereof. The fact that they occasionally have their own petty little internal disputes does not mean that they are incapable of advancing agendas that threaten the white, goy civilization.

    • Replies: @Druid
  69. jtgw says:
    @J1234

    Yeah, Langdon seems to want to eat his cake and have it, too. He wants Steyn to feel guilty for having supported Islamization and immigration earlier but doesn’t give him credit for changing his views now. There is a lot of evidence that European Jews are waking up (http://www.vdare.com/posts/sailer-why-are-european-jews-to-the-right-of-american-jews). I think it’s reasonable to point out that plenty of Jews are supporting Islamization, but it doesn’t follow that “the Jews,” i.e. Jews in general, are supporting it.

  70. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Muslims regime in Indonesia has occupied Christian Papua since 1963 , committing genocide that has resulted in the deaths of more than half a million Christian Papuans . A can say one thing for you Mr. Langdon , you manage to cuck harder for Islam than most .

    • Replies: @Anon
  71. Svigor says:

    Let me guess, your father was in a “Jews first” (Romans 1:16) cult that worshiped a “King of Israel” (John 1:49) and pledged allegiance to a foreign “Holy” land (Rev. 21:2). Christians are Jew-addled traitors.

    You are describing heresy, not Christianity. Yes, most White “Christians” today are either communist heretics, or Zionist heretics; Hell, the bloody “pope” is a communist heretic. But it’s still not right to paint Christianity with that brush.

    So let me see if I understand. If some Germans supported Nazism and some Germans opposed it, then obviously Germans as a whole were neutral with respect to Nazism, because it’s “some” and “some”. Yes? And if some people are struck by lightning and some people aren’t, then the two groups must be equal in size, because it’s “some” and “some”. Yes? In general, if a = b + c, then b must equal c in size, influence, importance, etc.

    You’ve put your finger on the Zhid Method of Argumentation; make it very plain you think the people you’re trying to convince are stupid, repeat until The Next Time.

    This piece is so vile on so many levels. It’s cause and effect which is causing the refugee problem. Don’t cause chaos in the region and there wouldn’t be people fleeing. And nowhere in Europe are Muslims trying to dispossess the Europeans of their land. You cannot tarbrush an entire community for the behaviour of a few. We don’t blame all Christians for the crimes of a few so it’s double standards.

    You have to go back.

    I don’t see Jews as promoting a welfare state. It’s more that they see a diverse country as good for the Jews.

    Unless they’re the majority in charge. Then they see a diverse country as bad for the Jews. It’s almost as if the overriding concern is what’s good for the Jews, and not any concern about diversity, per se.

    The non-Jewish white European elites loathe and detest ordinary people. They hate them and fear them as much as the Jews do.

    People like saying this, but it isn’t borne out by the facts. Yes, our elite are treacherous. No, they don’t have it in for us to the extent that Jews do.

    And even in countries such as Australia where Jewish influence is quite minor, the elites are just as determined on national self-destruction.

    Again, people like saying this, but it isn’t borne out by the facts. USA is peak Jew, and peak demographic disaster. Other European countries aren’t as far along the Diversity Timeline of Death as the US is; most aren’t even close.

    Mark Steyn is a witty chap whose barbs often hit the target zone. It’s impossible not to appreciate his stylish commentary. But he has a blind spot where Jewish political actions and propaganda are concerned.

    He is at the mercy of the media (e.g., Fox News) that allow him to speak to a mass audience. It’s a rare privilege. Surely he is bright enough to understand that certain ideas are off-limits if he wants to keep his soapbox in the heavily Jewish-saturated news/entertainment industry. A few ill-chosen words that aren’t good for the Jews and he’ll be talking mainly to himself in an obscure corner.

    Agreed. Steyn’s a lot less of a problem than 99.9% of the other scum in Big Media.

  72. Lex says:
    @Wally

    How about Generalplan Ost?

    • Replies: @fnn
  73. exudd1 says:
    @Blake

    Well said! Excellent, to the point comment. Thanks.

  74. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @biz

    “Some Jews support Islamic immigration to Europe. Others do not”

    Well, why don’t you take a closer look at where the supporters of the Islamic immigration are situated on the power ladder? Let’s start with “partially Jewish” Cameron and his buddy “Lord” Feldman, a powerful pro-Israel dealer and patron of Sayeeda Warsi and likes. — See the hapless Priti Patel who was caught on pro-Israel activities arranged by “Lord” Polak (who bought his lordship with the help of “partially Jewish” Cameron). These “Lords” are powerful schmoozer for Israel, along with other members of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), which is “beyond doubt the most well-connected and probably the best funded of all Westminster lobbying groups.”
    Then there is Erwin Kohn, President of the Jewish Community in Norway – does he supports the right of return for Palestinians? – No, no, no — only for Jews (even when of highly uncertain ancestry).
    The malicious Alan Shatter, the former Ireland’s Minster of Justice, used to be a very efficient smuggler of the immigrant ["his ‘achievement’ in granting Irish (and hence EU) citizenship to a motley collection of 68,000 Third Worlders (=1.5% of the Irish population) in the 28 months he’s been in office. Prior to that the annual average was just a couple of hundred.] Why don’t the welfare office of Ireland sues Jesus out of the scoundrel?
    Then there is immigration minister Barbara Roche (Jewish) to whom the UK should “thank” for the invasion of unskilled Somalis (more than 200,000) and the mess in Calais. It would be only fair if citizens of Calais had a chance to express their opinion of Barbara Roche policies to Roche in person. But she “wanted us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.”
    Do the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI)want to see the “benefit of a multicultural society” in Israel? No? – Why?!

  75. Svigor says:

    The White elite and the Jewish elite are fundamentally quite different. Jews act in their own ethnic interests, while the White elite acts against its own ethnic interests, and on behalf of Jewish interests. Trying to raise awareness of ethnic interests among the White elite makes sense, is worth doing in hopes of converting some of them to our side. The same can’t be said of Jews. In other words, the White elite is our natural ally, but Jewry is not.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  76. Svigor says:

    BTW, all you zionist shills here claiming that we are ‘painting with a broad brush’ on the subject of the Jews have missed the point entirely. Nobody here is accusing your friendly neighborhood dentist of being an integral part of some worldwide conspiracy. All we are pointing out is that the vast majority of Jews in the West who have real influence and power are usually either zionists, neocons or cultural Marxists–or some combination thereof. The fact that they occasionally have their own petty little internal disputes does not mean that they are incapable of advancing agendas that threaten the white, goy civilization.

    Shiksa: Biblical Roots of Racism

    In-groups sandwich an outline for animosity, an organizing principle for prejudice, between layers of social support. Whether Christian or Muslim or Jewish, every extremist is supported by a small number of less extreme admirers and each of those supporters is buoyed, in turn, by a larger group of sympathizers. These connections are continuous right down to the bottom of the pyramid, where vaguely sympathetic in-group members are offended by the very extremists who would have no base, and no basis, without them. It is that vague sympathy which needs to be examined.

  77. Svigor says:

    Yeah, Langdon seems to want to eat his cake and have it, too. He wants Steyn to feel guilty for having supported Islamization and immigration earlier but doesn’t give him credit for changing his views now. There is a lot of evidence that European Jews are waking up (http://www.vdare.com/posts/sailer-why-are-european-jews-to-the-right-of-american-jews). I think it’s reasonable to point out that plenty of Jews are supporting Islamization, but it doesn’t follow that “the Jews,” i.e. Jews in general, are supporting it.

    The whole conversation shows how nuts Jews are. “Jews are turning the corner on Muslim (and only Muslim) immigration mania.” Yeah, that’s great. In a century maybe Jews will only be 95% out of their friggin’ minds.

  78. Heros says:
    @Lex

    I assume that you are referring to the Slavs. Do you mind backing up that assertion?

    Its always brandied about, but when the entire statement is taken in context it is another fake “gods chosen” claim.

    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @Lex
  79. fnn says:
    @Lex

    How about Generalplan Ost?

    Maybe it was a post-war myth:

    http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2011/10/holocaust-nazi-perspective.html

    The Prosecution at Nuremberg had submitted to Bach [Bach-Zelewski] an alleged confession of Peiper’s, according to which Himmler — in the presence of Peiper and others, including Bach — had drawn up a plan by which, under cover of the military campaign, forty million Slavs were to be slaughtered. At this point Bach — as he now averred — turned indignantly to the Prosecution’s interrogator and declared that Himmler had spoken of killing “only” thirty millions. In conclusion Bach told my informant that after this admission, he could no longer deny the fact of the proposal, and had to give his evidence accordingly.

    Now, at last, we were getting near to the heart of the matter, and the former S.S. Leader from Himmler’s staff was able to put the whole story together. He remembered indeed the very occurrence on which it was founded. One evening early in 1941 Himmler and some of his cronies were sitting round the fire in the Wewelsburg; in addition to Bach and Peiper there were present Heydrich, Daluege, Obergrüppenführer Wolff, and Rauter, one of the Gestapo chiefs in Holland. Himmler spoke of an impending war in the east, which, he said, was unavoidable, the only question being when it would start and who would fire the first shot. He warned the company of the difficulty of the coming conflict and said in effect: “Germany is technically, Russia numerically, superior. The Soviet has unlimited power over its citizens and will sacrifice them without compunction: should Germany allow herself to be similarly tempted she will incur instead of strategical victory biological defeat.” Later in the evening, Himmler computed the possible casualties on both sides, and estimated that in view of their determination to resist, and taking into account epidemics and famine, the Russians’ losses might total anything up to thirty million.

    What a revelation! Himmler’s calculations of the enormous losses caused by military action and the general results of war were of course something very different from a deliberate and diabolical campaign of murder. I was reminded of Clemenceau’s “vingt millions de trop” — an expression which had been exploited by our German propaganda. But surely we had never distorted that remark beyond the bounds of reason, as this not dissimilar calculation of Himmler’s had been distorted! I could see at last how, in the hands of a determined Prosecution, Himmler’s thirty million hypothetical casualties had become metamorphosed into thirty million victims of a premeditated murder.

  80. utu says:

    Very good article. Obviously Mark Steyn is dangerous zionist propagandist. Unfortunately this is not obvious to many who like him because he appears to be an advocate of conservative causes they agree with like anti-PC or anti-Global Warming. But we should remember that Islamophobia is not a part of our, i.e., gentiles’ conservative causes. We Europeans defeated Islam encroachment on Europe several times already. Every time Jews were ambivalent or on the side of Islam like during the times of Reconquista. Now we are told by Jews that Islam is our enemy. We would say that it does not have to be so. We can contain Islam and we can stop Muslims from moving to Europe. We can do it without phobia and hate. It would be easier however if liberal Jews did not work against us. If Mark Steyn wants to be helpful he should direct his activities at liberal Jews who constrain us and do not tell us that we must hate Islam and Arabs. We do not mind Muslims and Arabs when they are where they live in the ME. That Israel does not like them there it is really not our problem.

  81. ‘Muslim child’. LOL

    https://voiceofeurope.com/2017/12/germany-afghan-teen-refugee-who-raped-and-murdered-german-girl-is-actually-33-years-old/

    ‘Sexual harassment’ was not a problem before Inclusion-Invasion, aka Inclasion.
    EU tries to tackle problems with Diversity by ‘nudging’ against ‘sexual harassment’.

  82. DaveE says:
    @Malla

    Great post. However, it illustrates the stark contrast between the Muslim world and the catatonic, brain dead Christian world. At least the modern one.

    This idea that “pacifism” can be used to control vast numbers of people is clearly diabolical genius at work and Christians fall for it all the time.

    The notion of “turning the other cheek”, supposedly taught by Christ, sounds all warm and fuzzy when read superifically. But does it mean that if you catch someone raping you daughter, you should offer him your other daughter, rather than break his neck?

    I think not. Clearly this was an “editorial” manipulation, total or partial, slipped into the Bible early on. Probably about the same time the fake letters of Paul (which contradict Christ every other verse) were magically “discovered” and deemed to be “gospel”, undoubtedly by the fraudsters who wrote them.

    My point is, at least Muslims seem to have FINALLY figured out who the enemy is and are wise to his tactics.

    I personally have my doubts that Christians ever will.

    BTW even Gandhi, “Mr. Passive Resistance” understood clearly the limitations of his Satayagra (however you spell it) strategy. He knew that once war broke out, “passive resistance” was tantamount to suicide.

    • Replies: @Malla
  83. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @geokat62

    Excellent data and links. The “crazy” claim that the Jews are behind the multicultural/open borders policies in white countries looks to be literally true – in every single case. Amazing.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  84. @Lex

    How long have you been reading here? You are seriously behind the class if you’re going to swallow whole this blatant ant-Nazi propaganda and cite Wikipedia articles as proof of the same.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  85. Svigor says:

    Diaspora Jews are so full of shit, they’re genuinely surprised when someone mentions how odd it is that they’re just maybe “turning the corner” now on Muslim immigration, when all the while they’ve been bosom buddies with Israel Jewry, who are around the corner, down the block, around another corner, and have donned a trenchcoat and fedora, and have been so since day 1.

  86. @Anonymous

    Please!
    Do not use the term Jews. I am uncomfortable with it.
    Behind “multicultural/open borders policies are Rothschild-Sosos link with few thousand minions, and Globalists. That there are some Jews among them is not a main point.
    After all Jews are everywhere, even in opposing camp.

  87. Vinteuil says:

    Mark Steyn has done as much as anybody ever has to raise public awareness of the dangers of mass immigration into Europe & the USA. And he’s done so at great personal cost – to his career, & even to his personal safety.

    It’s just disgusting to read a bunch of intellectual pygmies calling him out because he doesn’t hate jews enough for their taste.

    What could he possibly write that would satisfy them, without at the same time consigning himself to the ash-heap of major media untouchables, along with Joseph Sobran, Larry Auster, John Derbyshire & Steve Sailer?

    Suggested answer: nothing.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @geokat62
  88. mikael says:

    I simply had to comment on this moronic drivel about the Islamic world and Joojos.

    yeah, religion, funny isnt it, every time, every god dammed time I read something from so called Alt, sites, we end up in an shit shoveling contest, how bad is Islam, when people, whom obviously dont know much or what you do know is been taken from what, Jihad watch, huh Pamela Geller, huh.

    And this Moorish nonsense is just that, bullshit, the truth is something entirely else, child.
    And this time I will concentrate on the NorDick country’s, since the bullshit about whom is worse is the hit of the day, you obviously need some other inputs when we are back tracking into historical fog.
    Norway, was Christianized by Sword, of with our heads if we didnt bow to the “white Christ” and guess whom was behind that, the Catholic church.
    And Norway was Budistic and in my land, an ancient bear cult, before the happy head chopping Christians arrived.
    Guess where the witch burning where still preformed all the way to the 1700, where in the world did they burn most people, do you know that, and by whom, in my land, Northern Norway and Finland.
    Do you know about Crusades, I guess you do, but did you know that the Rome sent 3 crusades to the North, huh, killing barbarians aka Finns, the lasts was in the 1300s.
    Etc.

    The second thing is this, I have no sympathy with the Sweds and the Norse, nope, what this f…. experience right now, with rape, random violence, downright murder and no or little punishment for this crimes, stole property’s, stole children for sex toys and forces slave labor, medical experiments to an row on atrocity’s I shall not go thru, all this have they them self done to My people for century’s.
    Do you know how evil the Swedes are, I do, they have slaughtered, raped and murdered thousands of my people, invaded and stolen our land, etc, and to day, this is revered as an good thing among the Khazars, whom is the truth about the so called Norse and what is in Sweden as we speak, aka Turks, this time its the scumbags Sweds and even more rotten Norwegians going thru the same as we have endured for century’s.

    Yeah, f… them, let the drown in their own cowardliness and compliance.
    I just hope they pump millions of Africans, I dont care, they will never live where Im from anyway, so why bother, huh, I dont.
    And by this rants, I just wanted to underline something you ignorant creeps forget, its about greed and politics, tools have varied thru eons, and peoples put against each others for as long as humans have existed.
    The names change, the people change but the effect is the same, undermine and take over another mans land just like ISISrael is doing as we speak, and invents history as it is going forward and is expanding their domain.
    Nothing new, we have experienced it all, thats why i know the game inside and out.
    This was/is the short version.

    The to Islam, again Unz, I dont know why this stupid lies are been pimped, when we know this isnt Islam, its an Cult, designed to capture peoples mind and create political powers, witch again have been used to do a lot of things, incl been a reason for wars, to then blame the religion is to me an show of total ignorance, nothing else, this is an show of an inability to not be able to diversify your thinking.
    Wahbism and the Babylonian Talmud, are the same, not created by the same people but in their belief, based on the same direction, tribalism, racism and power.
    Why do our Gov. found and support Wahabism, huh, even an right winged so called Nationalistic Gov, whom is still doing this, do enlighten me, but it fits some of the issues written in this article.
    To the claim Islam is an fundamental evil religion, is a flat out lie.

    What happens in Swden is an invasion, created by the western elite, in the beginning was for cheep labor, and its till to have cheep labor, but this time the Americans and the Brits, whom created this scums, been agreed to destroy our society’s, for the benefit of the fascistic gov, in both Norway and Sweden, undermining workers right, undermining our society, etc, to then blame the scums is a but to easy, when wars isnt taken into the equation I consider articles like this to be about hate propaganda, when the majority of scums are secular, huh, not religious.
    I blame our Gov. for all this, nobody else.
    I blame ignorant like you for the rest, the war against Libya whom opened the gates of hell, and where the f…. where you.
    The multinational corps whom is raping Africa, crashes their fragile economy’s, and sends millions into dirt poor life’s where the resources is stolen by the same people whom is behind this one world gov.
    Until you creeps gets this I have little hope for anything other then more misery and pain.

    But I have NO sympathy.
    And dont insult our intelligence with bullshit, Unz.

    peace

  89. Yet nothing killed off the West’s spirit like the State’s stealing the welfare function from the Church.

    Exactly. It’s the welfare state. Same with the decline of the black family. If they’d just had fathers living with ‘em, young black fellows in the U.S. wouldn’t kill each other like they do in Africa and the Caribbean.

  90. Kiko says:

    It has nothing to do with the Holocost. The reality is this:

    - It was Europe’s need for cheap labour in the 50′s and 60′s that brought Muslims to Europe. The best examples are those of Britain bringing in south east asians from Pakistan, Bangladesh and others, and the example of France bringing in Algerians, Moroccans and others.

    - The Jews always saw the growing presence of Muslims in Europe as a danger against them. Why? Because Jews believe more Muslims means more protests in the heart of Europe against the criminal activities of Israel. Also, Jews think that Muslims will eventually make it to top positions in Europe, which will mean undermining Israel and exposing it to attacks and criticism. Finally, Jews have always presented themselves as the victims in Europe, and have long benefited from it. A strong Muslim presence, would mean Islamophobia, and hence the emergence of a new victimised community in Europe.

    For these reasons, zionist groups are on the attack, pointing that Muslims in Europe are a danger for Europe, and are the enemy from within. The reality is obviously far from this. The vast majority of Muslims are exemplary and law obeying citizens.

  91. Kiko says:

    Also, it is important to distinguish between Jews and Jews … they are not all the same. There are Jews who are decent and are critics of Israel and some are even the creation of Israel

  92. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    I’m sorry but “notalljews” hashtag is not going to cut it. The number of Jews “in opposing camp” is minuscule. Meanwhile, the “bad” Jews are absolutely in charge of the Globalist NWO project from its banking, politics, media or war. Every time I scratch a surface of goyim suffering or death, a group of smug, hostile Jews appears at the centre of it. This is not new, unfortunately, as can be seen from more than two millennia of recorded goyim experiences.

    Personally, I’ve lost my sense of goy humour when I realised that my race is getting genocided by the Jews. Never again.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  93. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Vinteuil

    First: the author is clearly objecting to Mark Steyn’s efforts to paint the Jews as victims instead of ultimate perpetrators. Steyn knows better but he has deliberately decided to mislead his audience.

    Second: by your own admission, he did it to avoid the “ash-heap” which stands in stark contrast to your gushing appraisal of his bravery. Most media personalities are too scared to tell the truth but that can be achieved by not mentioning the Tribe. Only a sycophant will go out of his way to promote Jewish victim-hood regarding this topic.

    Third: Steyn can be very intelligent and convincing. By mixing 90% truth and 10% crucial lies he’s doing much more damage that some random CNN gerbil. Your own reaction is a proof of that. He skilfully told you so many truths that you can’t believe he might be dishonest.

    • Agree: utu
  94. For the American version, see: Podhoretz, John.

  95. @biz

    The problem, from what I’ve seen here, is that it’s the ordinary Jews who don’t support Islamic immigration, and the elites who do support it, often rabidly (like gentile elites, but much moreso). Ordinary Jews have their lives impacted negatively by Islamic immigration, but they do get to have State-sanctioned Jewish Community Security Trust https://cst.org.uk/ security guards patrolling their streets, and protecting them from the worst effects. The rest of us don’t get that.

    So there is a continuum, and certainly NAJALT. But the people most consitently homicidal towards the Europeans are the leftist Jewish elite, and those most victimised are lower class non-Jewish whites.

  96. @Lex

    And Adolf Hitler ached for extermination or enslavement of hundreds of millions of white gentile people.

    You’re at UR. Old propaganda like that isn’t going to sell too well. In fact, making a statement like that without substantiation marks you as someone who speaks before he thinks and who isn’t used to thinking or questioning what he ought to question.

    Here’s a little primer for you so that you can hopefully begin to think rather than parrot simple minded propaganda.

    “… this entire myth, so prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is either completely untrue or not entirely the truth.
    If people should learn this intellectual fraud about Hitler’s Germany, then they will begin to ask questions, and searching questions…”

    Murray Rothbard, Revisionism for Our Time
    Mr. Rothbard was an American Jew and an historian of the very highest caliber.

    http://mises.org/daily/2592

    Here’s another, and tho it’s about WW1, the idea tells you something about why the Nazis came to power. You may also ask yourself what was going on in Germany’s back door at that time. (Hint: Bolshies funded by big bankers.)

    The truth is that we have got our way. We have got most of the things we set out to get…The German Navy has been handed over; the German mercantile shipping has been handed over, and the German colonies have been given up. One of our chief trade competitors has been most seriously crippled and our Allies are about to become her biggest creditors.That is no small achievement. In addition, we have destroyed the menace to our Indian possessions.

    -David Lloyd George, Quoted in Lord Riddell’s diary entry (30 March 1919), J. M. McEwen (ed.), The Riddell Diaries 1908-1923 (London: The Athlone Press, 1986), p. 263

  97. @Intelligent Dasein

    How long have you been reading here? You are seriously behind the class if you’re going to swallow whole this blatant ant-Nazi propaganda and cite Wikipedia articles as proof of the same.

    You beat me to it.

    Quoting Wiki here, on a subject like this, amounts to wearing a fluorescent orange dunce cap top with multi-colored flashing lights.

    Wiki? Seriously?

    Do you wear a T-shirt that sez “Kick Me” as well?

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  98. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “there is not one Jewish organization that I am aware of … that does not welcome this invasion”

    And yet on the other hand, Taylor Swift has maintained troubling silence on the issue, troublingly, as well

  99. @Anonymous

    I do agree with you what you say. But if we start to do calculus only small number of rich Jews, and intellectual elites who are doing the mischief. Overwhelming number of Jews are those who are only trying to make a living, having professions or little shops.
    I always wondered, and I am still wondering how the Jewish elites can control the US, and Western Europe’s governments. Bribery? Extortion? Threats? Magic wand?
    I just do not know?

  100. @Simon in London

    So maybe most of ordinary Jews are part of elites because most jewyes, those who are not on the elites, favor en masse immigration (Trojan horse) and any ideological policy which are implicitly or explicitly anti white.

    Even 99,99% of them were potentially innocent the impact of this supposed tiny % is so huge and so destructive that condemn the group itself. But reality show that most of them are very on the left. What is not clear is how full blown aware this (silent) majority is about most important lines of this mega project of extermination of white people via all sophisticated available methods.

    Or most of them are hopelessly confused as white liberal gentiles or most them are insufferably hypocritical at very malevolent levels.

    • Replies: @Simon in London
  101. Such complete nonsense. Except for Iran Deal, Obama stuck to the globalist program. There was nothing ‘leftist’ about him.

    • Replies: @neutral
    , @utu
  102. @Simon in London

    Yup.

    It amazes me that so many fail to understand the glaring fact that some, if not most, of the financial “ultra-elite,” both Jew and goyim, don’t give a fig for anyone but themselves, whether Jews or goyim.The dichotomy isn’t distinct, but on a continuum as you point out. Anyway, the rest of us are effectively their slaves and dupes at best.

    Indeed, who could expect anything but?

  103. dfordoom says: • Website
    @jtgw

    See here for evidence that European Jews in fact vote more conservatively due to the fears of what Islamization will mean for them.

    Because it’s not Jews against Christians. It’s elites against non-elites.

    • Agree: jacques sheete
  104. geokat62 says:
    @Vinteuil

    What could he possibly write that would satisfy them, without at the same time consigning himself to the ash-heap of major media untouchables, along with Joseph Sobran, Larry Auster, John Derbyshire & Steve Sailer?

    I was about to take you to task for trying to put JD and the others in the same category as JS, but then I looked up who Larry Auster was and was pleasantly surprised by his writings.

    He is the author of The Path to National Suicide: An Essay on Immigration and Multiculturalism.

    Here’s a brief excerpt from the Introduction: Breaking the Silence:

    Even if all illegal entries were stopped tomorrow, the United States would still be receiving an historically unprecedented and ever­ growing influx of legal immigrants from the Third World. Up to 1965, 85 percent of the U.S. population was of European origin; as a result of the 1965 immigration reforms, the U.S. is now receiving a stream of legal immigrants that is 90 percent non­-European—twice as many immigrants as are received by all the other countries of the world combined. There are some who ecstatically welcome this multiracial and multicultural influx, seeing it as the beginning of a brave new global society in America, the first “world­ nation.” There are others who worry that if the present mass immigration continues, it “would lead not only to a gradual but to a radical mutation in the composition of the American people, and the transformation of the very essence of the present civilization of the United States.”…

    Indeed, by the year 2089 America will be in large part a Hispanic and Asian society in which whites will be a minority—a revolution in the nation’s character that will dwarf the changes brought by earlier waves of European immigrants. This ethnic transformation is already being reflected in a multiculturalist ideology aimed at totally recasting our conception of ourselves as a nation.

    Surely it behooves all American citizens to consider carefully the profound consequences to our society of such a radical change in population and culture. But current immigration debate is to be noted mainly for its astonishing triviality…

    http://jtl.org/auster/PNS.pdf

    Rather than reading the book, people can get the Reader’s Digest version by reading this short speech he gave to an AmRen conference in 1994, Multiculturalism and the War Against White America.

    I’ll leave you with the concluding paragraph:

    In Deuteronomy, Chapter 28, God pronounces the curse that will fall on the people of Israel if they fail to follow God’s law:

    Your sons and your daughters shall be given to another people, while your eyes look on and fail with longing for them all the day; and it shall not be in the power of your hand to prevent it. A nation which you have not known shall eat up the fruit of your ground and of all your labors; and you shall be only oppressed and crushed continually; so that you shall be driven mad by the sight which your eyes shall see.

    Unless America wakes up to the threat of demographic and cultural dispossession, and finds the will to resist it, the curse pronounced in Deuteronomy awaits us all.

    https://www.amren.com/news/2016/11/multiculturalism-and-the-war-against-white-america-anti-white-racism-lawrence-auster/

  105. @jacques sheete

    Speaking of dunces, I mad a boo-boo.

    I should have written, Does he wear a T-shirt that sez “Kick Me” as well?

  106. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Overwhelming number of Jews are those who are only trying to make a living, having professions or little shops.

    True, that!

    I always wondered, and I am still wondering how the Jewish elites can control the US, and Western Europe’s governments. Bribery? Extortion? Threats? Magic wand?

    All of that. The magic wand is their control of credit. They obtained control of the nations’s credit through control of the press and “Hollywood,” massive propaganda, smears, intimidation, terrorism, assassination, bribery, extortion, and a whole host of other nefarious underworld piratical activities, funding of useful idiots such as the Bolshies, various “think tanks,” and “public affairs committees,” government corporations that they control, control of universities, and bureaucracies and who can imagine what else.

    About a century ago people in the US,including politicians spoke openly about it and all that was common knowledge, but the mega-money interests won. They put their poodles in positions of power and there are always plenty of goyim to go along with the program. For proof just look at the trash we in the US have had for presidents and “representatives” over the decades. It’s been a relentless slide to the bottom.

    If you really want to know, you could read the likes of Robert M. LaFolette or Larry P. MacDonald to name just 2 of hundreds if not thousands who had a clue.

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=La+Folette&atb=v92-4_f&ia=web

    You asked the big question and good for you!

    The bigger question is, ” What do we do about it?” I do not pretend to have an answer, but some first steps are to reject their lies and question everything they say and do.

    • Replies: @DaveE
  107. @jack ryan

    This might be one of the ugliest political couples in Western civilization’s history:

    Forgive my lowering the tone even further, but I can never see a picture of either Weiner or Abedin without recalling that old joke about the horse who goes into a bar and the barman says: “Why the long face?”

  108. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Svigor

    Trying to raise awareness of ethnic interests among the White elite makes sense, is worth doing in hopes of converting some of them to our side.

    A nice idea, but the elites have never identified with the common people. Never.

    There’s a very good reason the elites fear the common people. If the common people ever gained real political power they would line the elites up against the nearest wall and shoot them (and no-one could blame them for wanting to do so).

    So the elites have a choice. They can serve their own class interests (and the interests of the Jews), in which case they will continue to prosper. Or they can throw in their lot with the common people who want to shoot them.

    Trying to convert the non-Jewish western elites is an exercise in futility. Those elites need to be crushed, not converted.

  109. nsa says:

    “What to do about it?”
    Simple. Follow the example of the wise Emperor Claudius who in 46 AD evicted the troublesome self-serving jooies from Rome. Problem solved.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  110. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    I always wondered, and I am still wondering how the Jewish elites can control the US, and Western Europe’s governments.

    It isn’t exactly Jews who are controlling these things, it’s “Jewishness.” And Jewishness isn’t something unique to the renegade Rabbinical heretics who currently practice that false religion, it is in part the result of spending the last thousand years in a state of historyless fellaheen nomadism. The Jews are the ultimate rootless cosmopolitans. They think only in terms of “combinations” (to use Vilfredo Pareto’s terminology). That is to say, in dry abstractions like money, internationalism, human rights and things of that nature. America is currently importing a replacement class of “Jews” in the form of the Chinese and Indians, who in terms of civilizational life cycles are in the same terminal state.

    The West is also rapidly approaching that state. Oswald Spengler, in a rather prescient passage, explained all this by saying that Judaism would soon lose its significance in the West due to the fact that the Western elites and the Jewish elites were moving closer together on all practical questions. The final issue of this is what we today call “globalism,” and the truth of it is borne out by the fact that the elites of all nations now feel a closer kinship with each other than any of them do to their respective countries.

    Of course, Oswald Spengler was something of an irreligious curmudgeon, so he missed the spiritual dimension to all of this. The Jews, being a deicide race who called down the blood of Christ upon themselves and their children, will always be cursed to wander the earth and bring trouble. There is an additional distasteful element about the Jews that one does not find in the elites of other nations, even though Spengler’s analysis was perfectly correct in purely natural terms.

  111. DaveE says:
    @jacques sheete

    Exactly. Credit is the name of the game. Sure, Jewish small business owners work hard, since they get to keep the money they make. Meanwhile, sucker Goyim like me have to work three times as hard to make their extortion payments to the Jewish Mafia……. if they can even GET a loan in the first place.

    And the minute we DO become successful, if ever but usually never…….. THEN the games REALLY begin.

    Then, if we don’t kill ourselves from exhaustion, some Jew buys our business for pennies on the dollar and uses his free (stolen) money to take over the market and steal our innovations, patents, etc.

    Call it death by front-loaded exponential arithmetic.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @utu
  112. neutral says:
    @Priss Factor

    There was nothing ‘leftist’ about him.

    Considering that the new leftism means mass non white immigration, gay marriage, pursuing ever closer bonds with leftist corporations, censorship, affirmative action and expanding conflict to every corner in the world – he was definitely the left wing paragon.

  113. @Jake

    “For white people, it is Christ and Christendom or chaos.” You’re starting to make a little more sense. I assume this means we need to ship cuck pope Frannie to the Congo or the Philippines? If yes, then we need to get rid of black/Asian priests in the West. This will improve the West.

  114. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Bribery? Extortion? Threats? Magic wand?

    Lucian knew, and according to him, so did Mennipus! You may enjoy this. The whole piece is <4000 words.

    Me. … But how are things going up here? What is Athens about?

    Phi. Oh, nothing new; extortion, perjury, forty per cent, face-grinding.

    -Lucian of Samosata, Mennipus, A Necromantic Experiment. ~150 AD

    http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/luc/wl1/wl176.htm

  115. @Intelligent Dasein

    Exceedingly well put. Brilliant. All of it.

  116. utu says:
    @Priss Factor

    Except for Iran Deal, Obama stuck to the globalist program.

    This should have been looked at and remembered. The fact that Obama did the Iran Deal means that standing up to Jews is possible. No other president succeeded in standing up to Jews since Eisenhower. We know what happens to JFK and we know what Bush Senior was not reelected. They tried. But Obama succeeded and as a parting shot he did not veto the anti-Israel anti-settlement resolution at UN.

  117. @DaveE

    And I thought ID’s comment was brilliant. Your’s is spot on as well.

    Credit is the name of the game. Sure, Jewish small business owners work hard, since they get to keep the money they make. Meanwhile, sucker Goyim like me have to work three times as hard to make their extortion payments to the Jewish Mafia……. if they can even GET a loan in the first place.

    Tell me about it!

    And the minute we DO become successful, if ever but usually never…….. THEN the games REALLY begin.

    Try explaining that to anyone without first hand knowledge! Boy do they ever!

    Then, if we don’t kill ourselves from exhaustion, some Jew buys our business for pennies on the dollar and uses his free (stolen) money to take over the market and steal our innovations, patents, etc.

    Which is why we have a “pump” and dump economy. People wonder why we have booms and busts. There you have it right there…pennies on the dollar.

    It happened in the South after the War of Northern Bankers against the Agrarian South, and in Germany after WW1. The international banksters loaned (our) money to Germany, allowing it to build up into a “threat,” then pulled the credit, causing massive inflation and defaults and the scooping up of German property for pennies on the dollar. The Nazis were not about to let them collect their ill gotten gains, rose to power, then had to be demonized and crushed.

    Same idea in Iraq and Libya. The examples are many. Yet even today we have deluded suckers who believe the made up crap about the Nazis, and condemn as “Nazis” anyone who dares explain the real truth!!!

    The usurers have us by the b _ _ _ s!! Those of us who have ‘em, anyway!

    Is there any hope?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @DaveE
  118. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Intelligent Dasein

    “The West is also rapidly approaching that state. Oswald Spengler, in a rather prescient passage, explained all this by saying that Judaism would soon lose its significance in the West due to the fact that the Western elites and the Jewish elites were moving closer together on all practical questions.”

    This is a very interesting passage. I can understand that one does not need to influence someone who already agrees with you. But how does a shared philosophy between the Jews and the Western elites make this influence any less pernicious to a functioning Republic? I would think that the opposite result would be expected–a more pervasive and pernicious influence on our freedoms.

  119. @nsa

    Simple. Follow the example of the wise Emperor Claudius who in 46 AD evicted the troublesome self-serving jooies from Rome. Problem solved.

    The answer to “what” sounds good, but now the question is, “How?”

    I was just reading Benjamin Conant’s lecture, The Liberty of Ancients Compared with that of Moderns, (1819), and what worked for Rome is probably impossible to pull off today because we as individuals of the masses have almost zero political power; instead the power is in the hands of the massively rich.

    This seems to be a good translation of the work and I found it very interesting. You seem like someone who would as well, and it’s short, about 8500 words. i’d be interested in what you think.

    http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/constant1819.pdf

  120. But how does a shared philosophy between the Jews and the Western elites make this influence any less pernicious to a functioning Republic? I would think that the opposite result would be expected–a more pervasive and pernicious influence on our freedoms.

    That’s a huge part of the problem, for sure. What do we, of the pissant classes do about it, or rather how?

    • Replies: @AaronB
  121. polskijoe says:

    Majorities of Muslims and Jews
    are not friends of Europe. Most of them never fully assimiliate. They both hold antiEuropean views
    from both past and current issues.

    Flooding Europe with Muslims, while Jews run to Israel,
    and Zionists win.

    Those Jews who partly assimialate have duel loyalities (check the US Jews).
    In fact its better if Jews were actual non-Zionist and religious (like a minority are).
    and stayed away from politics and money.

    Instead Zionism has support Jews from the left and right.

    Zionists have managed to get support (including those who “criticize” Israel) from 8 or 9 out of 10 Jews.

    This pro Jewish and antiMuslim talk can only fool some. (say the EvangelicalZios in the US).
    Also lots of politicians (check some of the Visegrad group leaders).

    Why must Europe choose between Zionism quasinationalism or Globalistic leftist or corporate interests?

  122. utu says:
    @DaveE

    Jewish small business owners work hard, since they get to keep the money they make. Meanwhile, sucker Goyim like me have to work three times as hard to make their extortion payments to the Jewish Mafia

    Could you give some examples for the mechanism of this extortion?

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @DaveE
  123. @lavoisier

    But how does a shared philosophy between the Jews and the Western elites make this influence any less pernicious to a functioning Republic?

    Perhaps I was not totally clear about my intentions in the first comment. I was not trying to say that the influence is less pernicious. I was only trying to explain the apparent paradox of a small number of Jews literally controlling the entire Western world. The fact of the matter is, they don’t; not in that sense, anyway. If one were to imagine a secret cabal of immensely powerful Jews—Rothschilds or whomever—sitting in a mahogany-clad room, plotting how to enslave and destroy the goyim, one would go far astray. It’s more a case of the general worldview, of which Jews had previously been the best known exemplar, becoming the worldview of the Western elite as well. And no, this is certainly not less pernicious. It will ultimately result in the entire question coming to a head. The Jew-Nazi cycle will commence in a final battle in which the West will condense into its last, decisive historical form.

    It should be mentioned in this regard that the smarter critics of Western decadence (e.g. Nietzsche, Heidegger, and the ever present Spengler) were against crude antisemitism conceived along strictly ethno-genealogical lines, even though they were sympathetic to the broader themes that would otherwise tend to motivate a person in that direction. It is primarily not a matter of blood but of spirit. There are two fundamentally different worldviews in implacable, eternal opposition: the urbanites vs. the gentry, the kingdom of mammon vs. the kingdom of faith, money-values vs. land-values, the intellect vs. the blood, the Optimates vs. the Caesar, the revolution vs. the ancien regime, the globalists vs. the nationalists. In each of those pairs, the first one designates everything we really mean by “Jews,” while the second belongs to us, the nameless, voiceless people who are struggling to oppose them.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @AaronB
    , @lavoisier
    , @dfordoom
  124. @utu

    Could you give some examples for the mechanism of this extortion?

    Income taxes.

    Compliance costs.

    Licensing fees.

    Certification fees.

    To name a few. If you have to ask, you’ll never understand.

    • Replies: @utu
  125. polskijoe says:
    @Greg Bacon

    Jews travelled for 1000 years or more
    between different locations. Mostly being kicked out. (Middle East, Europe, North Africa, a minority in Asia and Caucasus mountain range).

    Thus their dna and ancestry of semitic parts ranges.
    Some look basically European, many look European-semitic, many look non-European.
    Often the nose and hair give them away (but not always).

    I recall reading Steyn is 1/8 Jewish, but cant prove it.

  126. Re-immigrate the Muslims to their own nations.
    If immigration is good, then re-immigration is even better.
    It is round trip than just one-way.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  127. utu says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Agree. Just one comment:

    I was only trying to explain the apparent paradox of a small number of Jews literally controlling the entire Western world.

    No other minority ever succeeded in such control. No other minority needs its anti-defamation league. No other minority needs to fight anti-minority sentiments because other minorities do not create these sentiments. This so because Jews unlike other minorities to achieve control must change the majority, its beliefs and values. This generates resistance in form of anti-semitism.

  128. I really don’t understand why Mr. Unz agreed to publish this. It’s his property and his editorial judgment as regards his editorial mission, but there’s a larger question of whether the act is helpful.

    It’s hard to see this as helpful. Somewhere out there is Joe and Jane Workaday Jewishperson – a few million of them – and an article like this is a signal to that person that “this is about who and what you are”, and not about the subject or substance. Well, if he and she get that message, why shouldn’t they close ranks – which would have the exact opposite of what one presumes would be the ostensible point of the article in the first place? You led, after all, with subject-be-damned.

    On the other hand – if the subject is about assertion of European identities, European culture, European solidarity … this is the really weird thing: those things need no justification. Anyone who treasures them is right to assert them. People who condemn those things or run red herrings by colluding any cherishing of one’s own people with racism, condemn themselves in perfect inverse relationship to how forcefully culture, identity and solidarity is asserted, sans racism and sans anti-semitism.

    It’s the specific – very weird – inability of so many to forcefully affirm European culture, peoples and solidarity, without slipping into some kind of out-tribe animus, that opens Europeans to the kind of unfair attacks that don’t seem to allow that people of European descent enjoy the right, like all the rest of the people of the world, to be, a people.

    Israel has a right to exist. Think about that assertion. Poland has a right to exist. Sweden has a right to exist.

    No one needs to be denigrated to assert that right. The Israeli didn’t say Jordan does not have a right to exist, etc. No tribe needs to be singled out to assert that right. No tribe needs to be fought to assert that right. All of the presumed culprits in this article would condemn themselves tongue-twisting into explaining why any self-affirming European culture doesn’t have a right to exist … so let them: let them condemn themselves.

    How about the campaign of 100 affirmations? A campaign of 100 European peoples affirming their right to exist in 100 articles? Maybe 500 – it could easily take that many. Then a Grande Finale when they say so together with one voice: we have a right to exist!

    Never a racist or anti-semitic word, just affirmations of peoples’ right to exist.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  129. utu says:
    @jacques sheete

    Hold on. No so fast. Jewish businesses do not pay income taxes, compliance costs, etc? Explain this statement:

    Jewish small business owners work hard, since they get to keep the money they make.

    • Replies: @neutral
  130. Walter says:

    This article has a go at Mark Steyn for his reticence on the J contribution to Muslim immigration.

    Fact is he is a marvelous Cassandra on the demographic aspect of Islamic immigration – possibly the best.
    Could he get his message across so widely if he addressed the JQ at the same time?

  131. Bill Jones says: • Website
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Why should whites take the risk? Fuckem all

  132. @MEexpert

    “Give the place back to native Indians”

    Natives would last about a week without the White man. After that they’d be throwing bones at nuclear reactors to make the lights come back on.

    Unfortunately, we’re stuck with them because they were here first. Semites on the other hand are an invasive species.

  133. sb says:

    I guess the fact is that if you want to make a good living in the American media -or anywhere really – there are certain posiitons which are verboten

    I read Steyn taking this into account and do wonder if his private views are any different.

    Maybe it is time for a Ferdinand and Isabella Appreciation Society

  134. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    Re-immigrate the Muslims to their own nations.
    If immigration is good, then re-immigration is even better.

    Haha. I like this.

  135. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    why shouldn’t they close ranks

    They should, and so should the white race and other goyim. The truth is getting revealed which can only sharpen the division. That’s a good thing. The goyim know.

    Israel has a right to exist.

    No it doesn’t.

  136. polskijoe says:
    @Jake

    Mostly agreed both on Jews and Wasp (their elites).

    During Kulterkampf there was Freemasonic (masquerading as Protestant.. many Protestants monarchs did join Freemasonry) to reduce the Church influence.

    Focusing on today.

    In the US, its about 70% Christian. 50% of US thinks Jews are chosen and and also some think Israel is special for 2nd coming, end times and other reasons. Thats part of the problem. Known as Judeo-Christianity a fusion of two opposite religions.

    Since 1945 all presidents have ended up falling to Jewish pressure.
    Even those who spoke against them.

    It appears the Jewish or Zionist groups have more power now than wasp. Since 1960s, maybe earlier.

    I think the bigger problem was the Protestant elites (who often joined Freemasonry),
    and thats partly how they became attached to Jewish money.

    Catholic monarchs had their court Jews, but certainly the Jewish power was much less.
    It was with Freemasonry in the 1700s-1800s that Jews started gaining power.

    During 1930s-1950s, much of America was against Jews, yet someone that changed massively.

    • Replies: @Anon
  137. Muslims are essentially primitive Jews in my view.

    Neither group respects the US constitution nor western values and both are Semitic-style liars in behavior.

    Jews in particular do everything they can to undermine the US constitution in various ways, including the promotion of mass immigration of victim culture people into the US.

    Victim culture people are conditioned by Jewish-owned broadcast media to trade votes with democrats-neocons in exchange for unconstitutional federal protected class group entitlements.

    Jews act as leaders and brokers and lobbyist for this victim culture entitlement scheme. All Jews support this scheme to some degree, both left and right.

    Foreign victim culture people are attracted t0 the US specifically because of the large-scale federal victim cult spoils system Jews have lobbied for aggressively.

    Muslims support the victim culture entitlement scheme in the US the same as Jews, with the only possible exception being the scheme’s slavish support for Israeli Jews.

    The victim culture scheme is so popular in the US and elsewhere that the federal government has invented a euphemism to institutionalize the scheme : diversity and inclusion.

    The federal diversity and inclusion scheme includes both Jews and Muslims as integral to the scheme.

    The scheme deifies whole groups of victim culture people as being collectively oppressed and underprivileged, and rewards cultists like a Pavlov’s dog with illicit federal entitlements in exchange for voting in favor of the democrat-neocon line of nonsense.

    One counter-solution to the Jewish-invented victim culture supremacy scheme’s perfidy is to enforce the US constitution literally.

    To effectively enforce constitutional literalism requires at the very least severe penalties for activist federal judges and for swifter removal from the bench.

    The complete elimination of recognition of all federal protected class groups and denial of their associated federal entitlements is another minimum requirement to restore constitutional literalism.

    [MORE]

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

    Feminist are entitled by federal law because of presumed Male oppression
    Jewish are entitled by federal law because of presumed Gentile oppression
    Queers are entitled by federal law because of presumed Straight oppression
    Muslims are entitled by federal law because of presumed Christian oppression
    Disabled are entitled by federal law because of presumed Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are entitled by federal law because of presumed White oppression
    Latinos are entitled by federal law because of presumed Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are entitled by federal law because of presumed Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are entitled by federal law because of presumed Militia oppression
    Native Americans are entitled by federal law because of presumed Paleface oppression
    Asians are entitled by federal law because of presumed Occidental oppression
    International Socialist are entitled by federal law because of presumed Local Government oppression
    Social Justice Crony Capitalist are entitled by federal law because of presumed Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist-Neocons are entitled by federal law because of presumed Anti-Fascist oppression

  138. Art says:

    Non-white non-Christian immigration is good for Jews. Of course, there will be opposition to this.

    Jew dogma. “The way to control the opposition – is to lead it.” “Jews must always be the victim.”

    Therefore, ether a Jew or a Gentile fluffer must be on each side of the immigration question.

    Jews champion the non-white non-Christian immigration, and a financially dependent Gentile (Steyn) leads “the Jews are the big victim” of immigration propaganda side of things.

    Isn’t that neat.

    Think Peace — Art

    p.s. Pumping hate for Muslims is an easy buck.

  139. Britain is being overrun by immigrants for one simple reason. It’s political system does not allow ordinary people to vote specifically on immigration. Surveys consistently show most people are immigration restrictionists yet the two main parties never run on immigration restrictionist policy. The same problem is played out throughout the West. No point talking about MSM brain washing or Jewish intellectuals when there are obvious structural impediments to implementing the general will, and these structural impediments were designed by bourgeois, gentile intellectuals in the 19th Century.

    Unfortunately most immigration restrictionists overlook this obvious problem and drone on about “democracy,” and “jews” and “zionists.” Immigration policy must be taken out of the hands of political parties, which are run by urban leftists and globalist financiers.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @dfordoom
  140. neutral says:
    @utu

    Hold on. No so fast. Jewish businesses do not pay income taxes, compliance costs, etc? Explain this statement:

    Since jews generally own the politicians (from the local to the international level), paying taxes is generally not an issue, they already know the favourable conditions that they work under so putting up appearance is not really a problem since they already have such big advantages from their corruption (both local to the international) that it does not matter. One can however not say the same to honest man and decent man who is requires to work under the same conditions.

  141. @Santoculto

    “most jewyes, those who are not on the elites, favor en masse immigration”

    No, in fact I recall a US survey which showed most US Jews had similar views to US gentiles, they opposed mass immigration, and this was lamented by elite anti-gentile organisations like the ADL. However they were shifted a bit to the Left.

    Should Jews be held more responsible for the behaviour of their Elites than gentiles are held for the behaviour of their Elites? It’s possible the answer is yes – I do see a lot more opposition from non-Jews to the behaviour of non-Jewish ruling elites, than I see from ordinary Jews to the behaviour of Jewish ruling elites. Outside of Israel, one very rarely (never?) sees Jewish populist or non-elite organisations condemn Jewish elites (or condemn gentile leftist elites, except for supposed anti-Semitism), no matter how destructive their behaviour.

    • Replies: @Santoculto
  142. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @polskijoe

    @ I think the bigger problem was the Protestant elites (who often joined Freemasonry),
    and thats partly how they became attached to Jewish money.

    Yes, one way or another. The Greeks, who valued individual choices, had it clear: there were four ways in which men give meaning to their lives: power, pleasure, money or honor. Following Christ, of course, raised the honorable course to Christian levels. Freemasonry, teaching the lack of truth, allows man to be guided by his baser desires, and go for money ( that also provides pleasure, power and celebrity)

    In this neo-pagan society, what can we do?

  143. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    You are severely underestimating the Jewish problem. Almost all of them believe that they’re better than the goyim and many see goyim as cattle to be used and even punished. They were indoctrinated to both fear and despise the goyim which is a very dangerous combination. So your Jew shopkeeper or professional is often a much more sinister player than you think. Just the fact that they’re big fans of propping each other up patiently, through generations causes great harm to host populations. This compound nepotism is designed to squeeze the goyim out of their own positions of power.

    Who Controls America? (examine the list on the right): https://thezog.wordpress.com

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  144. jack ryan says: • Website
    @Blake

    ” Don’t cause chaos in the region and there wouldn’t be people fleeing. ”

    I respond:

    That’s just utter ridiculous nonsense. Islam has always spread by mass migrations, mass invasions, mass violence. What about the Islamic conquest of india? Was this all caused by some chaos caused in the Arab Muslim world that upset Muslims so they had to migrate?

    Utter ridiculous nonsense. Unless others contain, repel Islam islam will spread like cancer.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  145. @Anonymous

    I do understand that Sanhedrin is alive and well. And they do not care too much for religious dogmas.
    But in any society not all man and women are soldiers.

  146. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @jack ryan

    Islam has always spread by mass migrations, mass invasions, mass violence.

    True. Here’s a short video showing the progress:

    https://hooktube.com/watch?v=c7y2LRcf4kc

  147. mikael says:

    ISISrael was invented in the 1800, period and is nothing but lies, there isnt an single thing that is truth about their constant barrage of garbage, since its just verbal diearea and nothing else, protected by an western MSM witch is corrupted beyond recognition.
    ISISrael never existed.

    http://individual.utoronto.ca/mfkolarcik/jesuit/herzog.html

    The Hasbaratnjiks never learn do you, children, no wounder you are so ecstatic about censure, cant handle the truth, huh.
    The bullshit about Israel and Jews is never ending, not only do they lie about it, but the problem again, is the media, and of course Politics and economics, witch again controls/guides education and science.
    This is what keeps their lies on going, and they never ever tell the truth, I dont bother to bitch slap this children since they probably is under education and needs the money, more that I do.

    http://thetruthnews.info/Facts_are_Facts.pdf

    The truth about Khazars, B. Friedman.

    Poor schmucks, but hey, the shoa must go on.

    peace

  148. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Hank Rearden

    Yep. That’s churches in America to a large extent. Here in the middle of the Bible belt I have encountered church people who send money to Israel.
    I have lost Christian friends for cautiously pointing out verses from the New Testament that state something different.
    Christians will make sure that the grip of those who Jesus called the “synagoge of satan” stay in control of their country. Don’t confuse them with facts.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  149. jack ryan says: • Website

    I’m not anti Semitic, some of my best friends were/are Jews.

    In my case this is true. Also, my best teachers at undergrad at Vanderbilt University were Jewish, my best teacher at Stern MBA New York University was Jewish.

    American and European Jews tend to be very good at many things – most things associated with education, intelligence.

    But, American/European Jews also tend to be really really bad at some important things. Jews suck – they are the worst on the issues associated with mass immigration to the West. Virtually every single Jewish American Congressman/US Senator gets an F immigration grade from NumbersUSA. Even supposedly Conservative GOP congressman like former House Majority leader Eric Cantor sucked on immigration – fortunately we gave him the boot and he’s forced to be a multi million $ Wall Street finance guy.

    I talk on occasion to regular Jewish guys who attempt modest efforts a patriotic immigration control – stuff like trying to keep out 8th Century Islamic terrorist like the guy from Bangledesh who tried to blow up another subway backed with commuters in New York City this week. Their honest efforts at sane immigration control usually/always come to naught.

    Jews are bat sh** insane on immigration. It’s like it’s one of the ten commandments and some horrible Neo Con Jew writing editorials for the Wall Street Journal in the 1980s actually proposed this to be a Commandment:

    “Thou Shalt have Open Borders” – and of course these same Neo Conservative Jews insist that Israel has every right to be a Jewish ethno state with strict – Jews only immigration. They see no hypocrisy.

    As for recommendations of what we Anglo WASP Gentiles should do about it. I recommend just being firm and fair with Jews on immigration. It’s nothing personal , but we insist on the right of our people to keep our country, keep our communities, since we lost the Ivy League universities to this tribe, we’ll have to start new Universities.

    We can still like Jewish comedians, Jewish artists, perfectly healthy, good great movies directed and produced by Jewish Americans. “White Christmas” was written by Irving Berlin. There is an excellent Broadway revival of “Holiday Inn”.

  150. AaronB says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    That was a pretty smart comment, thanks.

    I would reduce your pairs to one basic pair – egotistism vs spirituality.

    Nietzsche liked Jews because he shared their world view on a deep level despite surface differences – and Jews have always championed Nietzsche, like Walter Kaufmann.

    Schopenhauer, who despised the Jewish world view, is ignored today.

    • Replies: @Vinteuil
  151. AaronB says:
    @jacques sheete

    There is an ancient Aztec belief that our rulers are our enemies – perhaps nowhere else will you find this basic truth about the human condition confronted so honestly.

    Our rulers will always be our enemies – this is a fact of the human condition.

    The problem is, how can two such different human types get along on this small planet? The rulers, and the rest of us.

    The two types are so different that it’s been seriously suggested that two human species, of different descent, actually inhabit this planet.

    There is a book called Sky People that tries to show there are two human species here, Sky People and Earth People, and theories of reptilians are similar.

    It’s definitely a handy metaphor either way, Sky People/Earth People, that I like to use.

    In the past, there was something like a shaky alliance between rulers and everyone else, based on exploitation to be sure, but nonetheless- rulers wanted a peaceful, content, and relatively happy populace.

    So rulers supported religion which helped make people content.

    Modernity is the breakdown of this shaky alliance – today our rulers need us to be miserable and restless so we buy more stuff, work harder, etc. So our rulers do everything in their power to stoke our desires to fever pitch and generally convince us that we need more stuff.

    But such a situation will collapse of its own weight, and the rulers have overplayed their hand.

    The dream of a harmonious society with benevolent rulers can’t exist, but it doesn’t have to be quite as bad as it is now.

    For the Sky People, it doesn’t really matter if we get exploited by Earth People a little bit, because we aren’t so materialistic to begin with, as long as the system caters to the needs of Sky People as well. Earth People are happy to cater to those needs because it benefits them under the rules of that system.

    But when the Earth People try and make everyone into Earth People (materialistic, greedy, egotistic) because in the current system it benefits them for that to happen, and begin organizing society so that it no longer caters even a little bit to Sky People, that is when they have overplayed their hand and the system will cI’ll apse of its own accord.

    • Replies: @Talha
  152. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Thank you for your explanation.

    It does seem to come down to a battle of values. The baser values versus transcendent values.

    I have come to the realization that in our world today literally the only thing that matters to most people is money.

    This is truly a revolutionary change in spirit.

    I recall an incident that troubled me. I went to see my physician who was one of the most caring and dedicated individuals I had ever met. He was tireless in his dedication to his patients. While he was talking to me a young man in his early 30s came to his door and told him in front of me that he had to start seeing more patients and that he was not seeing enough patients to remain employed.

    I was appalled. This great man was being talked down to by a business fool who was nothing more than a bean counter.

    We are living in a sick world with upside down values.

    • Agree: AaronB, Talha
  153. lavoisier says: • Website
    @lavoisier

    Also one other very important fact.

    While the Ashkenazi, are, on average, smarter than the average goyim by about 10 IQ points, in terms of absolute numbers, goy geniuses exceed Jewish geniuses in the United States by about 600%. You read that right. The absolute numbers of goy geniuses in the United States far exceeds the number of Jewish geniuses. Their dominance of our culture in virtually every field that has an impact on our lives cannot be due simply to higher intelligence.

    There is something far more dangerous and destructive at play in our country than just a bunch of real smart Jews assuming the positions that they deserve.

  154. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @jacques sheete

    Buying lucrative enterprises for pennies on the dollar. Good method.
    First you create prohibition, then you buy up all the whiskey distilleries for pennies, then you lift prohibition. But keep the family name.

    Long time ago I talked to a wealthy man in Germany. I met him on a hike. So I asked him about “that” time.
    He said the Nazis were doing away with the current financial system, and if they succeeded, and the rest of the world caught on, no Jew could ever get another penny of interest.
    Have you heard of the “miracle of Woergl”? Check it out, it was stopped by the banks before it could get out of hand.
    Check out Sylvio Gesell.

    http://www.george-reiff.eu/miscellaneous/sub-section-about-germany/free-economy-and-the-miracle-of-worgl/

    Moslems pouring into Europe.
    To get them going, Make situation bad in their homelands. Offer them an incentive to come , as Western rulers are doing.
    What for? Well, listen to Barbara Lerner. She seems to know.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  155. @A Liberal Nationalist

    “Why 67% of American Jews – average Jews – support immigration reform – and being immigration reform an euphemism for amnesty and more chain migration mechanisms – for more mass immigration from third world and developing countries?”

    But what you have left out is Christian support for amnesty. From Numbers USA:

    QUOTE.
    The following groups have all announced that they support a mass amnesty. The groups are divided into four separate categories, including: advocacy, business, unions and religious denominations. We have provided the contact information for each group, and if you are affiliated with one or more of these organizations, we encourage you to contact them to express your opposition to their position.

    [MORE]

    {snip}

    Religious Affiliations

    American Jewish Committee
    Assemblies of God
    Brethren In Christ Church
    Christian Reformed Church in N. America
    Christianity Today (magazine)
    Church of the Nazarene
    Church World Service, Immigration and Refugee Program
    Elim Fellowship
    Episcopal Church
    Evangelical Lutheran Church of America
    Foursquare Church
    Grace Communion International
    International Pentecostal Holiness Church
    Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS)
    Mennonite Central Committee Washington Office
    Missionary Church
    National Association of Evangelicals (NAE)
    National Council of Churches
    National Council of Jewish Women
    Presbyterian Church (USA)
    Rabbinical Assembly
    Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism
    U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
    Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
    United Church of Christ
    United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society
    United Methodist Council of Bishops
    Wesleyan Church
    END QUOTE.

    • Replies: @A Liberal Nationalist
  156. Anon-og says:
    @Mike Garrett

    The Jews almost single-handedly gave the world two of the twentieth century’s most important creations: Communism and Nuclear Weapons. We would certainly have had neither without them. At this time of the year it is important to remind people who the Magi were whose visit to the baby Jesus has been so celebrated in the West. They were Persian, Iranian wise men, Zoroastrian scholars. You see, the Zoroastrians, who were running the major empire of Iran back then, were monotheists. They felt that their own faith was too subtle, intellectual, and complex for many peasants, so they encouraged Jews and Christians to come into their lands and teach the people. In time Islam in Central Asia carried on with this attitude. At the height of Abbasid power around 800 when Rome had a population of around 35,000 and Bagdad’s was around a million, a majority of the population were Christians and Jews. Over time small tax breaks for Muslims shifted most of the population to the mosques. When I traveled in Afghanistan in the 1970s, I was often urged to go along with the other men to prayers when the call came five times a day, and Jewish friends had the same experience.
    This entire attack on the world of Islam has been in the works for decades. Religious Jews fretted in Israel in the 1970s that the secular Jews in America were going to push America to make war on the Muslims, as a substitute for the Communists, whose threat had been justifying massive military expenditures. They said that it was destined to lead the Jewish people into their next big catastrophe, and for the same arrogance as before.

    Thank you for your comment…

  157. Anon-og says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    It isn’t exactly Jews who are controlling these things, it’s “Jewishness.” And Jewishness isn’t something unique to the renegade Rabbinical heretics who currently practice that false religion, it is in part the result of spending the last thousand years in a state of historyless fellaheen nomadism. The Jews are the ultimate rootless cosmopolitans. They think only in terms of “combinations” (to use Vilfredo Pareto’s terminology). That is to say, in dry abstractions like money, internationalism, human rights and things of that nature. America is currently importing a replacement class of “Jews” in the form of the Chinese and Indians, who in terms of civilizational life cycles are in the same terminal state.
    The West is also rapidly approaching that state. Oswald Spengler, in a rather prescient passage, explained all this by saying that Judaism would soon lose its significance in the West due to the fact that the Western elites and the Jewish elites were moving closer together on all practical questions. The final issue of this is what we today call “globalism,” and the truth of it is borne out by the fact that the elites of all nations now feel a closer kinship with each other than any of them do to their respective countries.
    Of course, Oswald Spengler was something of an irreligious curmudgeon, so he missed the spiritual dimension to all of this. The Jews, being a deicide race who called down the blood of Christ upon themselves and their children, will always be cursed to wander the earth and bring trouble. There is an additional distasteful element about the Jews that one does not find in the elites of other nations, even though Spengler’s analysis was perfectly correct in purely natural terms.

    This is sharp, I went to your blog hoping to read more on this…………

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  158. DaveE says:
    @utu

    Obscene interest rates, front loaded loans, patent theft (USPTO might as well be a synagogue) to name a few more.

    I was told by a Jew that many chosenites are not required to even repay their loans (since it’s all funny-money anyway, created by and for the Tribe) not to mention the obscene interest charged to Gentiles.

    “Only Goyim pay retail.”

    • Replies: @utu
  159. Talha says:
    @AaronB

    I like the Sky People/Earth People analogy. And your last paragraph is spot on.

    What I find interesting is that, if indeed there are these elites that are managing this whole influx of immigration (and it is not due to blatant stupidity – let’s not give government bureaucracies too much credit), then they are also behind the kinds/quality of Muslims that are being brought in. You had asked me about some book recommendations before, this is another one that I recently bought and gave to my father:

    https://www.amazon.com/Signs-Horizons-Meetings-Knowledge-Illumination/dp/0989364011

    These kinds of men wouldn’t come to the West if you offered them millions – but these are the ones that you would want here. They are the ones that have something serious to offer of benefit from those places – but, apart from some of the refugees who are fleeing broken countries, the rest of the Muslims coming here are the rabble drunk on the same materialistic nonsense which is suffocating the West. Yay – more addicts to add to the pile on! Investment advice: anti-depressants – they will keep booming.

    The irony of the situation is lost on most people.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @AaronB
  160. AaronB says:
    @lavoisier

    Thank you for mentioning this. This cannot be said often enough. It needs to be pointed out again and again, because it is utterly ignored.

    Someone like Derbyshire will tell you that Jewish dominance is merely because of IQ, completely ignoring the math of the Bell Curve, which in other contexts he is at such pains to uphold.

    It’s ridiculous.

    This also applies to Asian dominance in STEM by the way.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  161. DaveE says:
    @jacques sheete

    Thanks, Jacques. I’m a big fan of your comments, also.

    Yeah, I’m speaking from first-hand experience, I’m sorry to report.

    Yes, I think there is hope. The Tribe has lost a LOT of ground lately, as more people awaken. I don’t see them ever turning it around, although it will be a long, hard slog. IF (and only if) they don’t exercise the “Samson Option” when they realize it’s Masada 2.0 to the thirteenth power. THEN….. well…..

    Make peace with your God now. You’ll be covered either way.

    Anyway, carry on, pardner…..! (I’m from the wild, wild western USA so I’m entitled to say that……. No queer reference expressed or implied.)

  162. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Talha

    A crucial insight of religion is that “sky people” and “earth people” are really the same people, deep sown, and that both functions must coexist. You must have Mary and Martha.

    • Replies: @Talha
  163. Talha says:
    @Anon

    Indeed – the balance must be struck. That is for sure. Sky people can’t live off of litanies alone – they need food and shelter like everyone else.

    And Earth people must look to the sky, at least once in a while, or they will implode spiritually and mentally.

    Peace.

  164. AaronB says:
    @Talha

    Thanks, I’ll check that out Talha.

    Yes, I’ve long thought that by definition anyone coming to the West would have to be more materialistic than most.

    Why would spiritual men be attracted to the West?

    • Replies: @Talha
  165. @Santoculto

    Sources*

    Jews tell lies to gentiles as a matter of Semitic principles, so any survey of Jews or Muslims is worthless.

    Their actions speak louder.

    Look at the rulings of any Jew on the USSC and read oath-breaking lies.

    Most if not all Jews believe and act like Emma Lazarus’s poem on the Statue of Liberty is in the text of the US constitution or should be.

    If they could do it without repercussions, the Lazarus poem would be amended today by victim culture supremacist to disinvite all white non-Hispanic straight Christian anti-fascist anti-communist males.

    • Replies: @Santoculto
  166. Talha says:
    @AaronB

    Hey AaronB,

    Why would spiritual men be attracted to the West?

    Honestly, at least from our community they aren’t – not for the reason most people are. One of the authors I recommended to you, Shaykh Nuh Keller (a convert Sufi-scholar who happens to be a teacher of some of my old friends from UCLA), moved to Jordan. There’s not much here from a spiritual perspective other than harvesting new souls that are fed up with post-modern collapse.

    Many people tried to get the late Shaykh Abul-Hasan Ali Nadwi (ra) to settle down in the West – he could have easily gotten in, he knew plenty of people who could have pulled strings. He was considered a saintly man, even among the Hindus of India (easily the embassy would have made sure he got in) – he thanked them, but politely refused and returned to his home in India after advising us that we should change our intention and sicerity for being in the West if we came here for material reasons.

    I will say; I am very, very impressed by the converts who have gone East to study and come back as scholars. They are incredible specimens and I think they will make a profound impact in the West. One of my favorites is Shaykh Yahya Rhodus who studied in that same place I mentioned in Yemen.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  167. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @unpc downunder

    Britain is being overrun by immigrants for one simple reason. It’s political system does not allow ordinary people to vote specifically on immigration.

    Not quite true. The British recently voted in a referendum on whether they wanted more European immigration. (They voted no). There now need to be similar referendums on the separate issues of Asian and African immigration.

    • Replies: @englishmike
  168. @Joe Franklin

    Yes, it’s just i’m trying to figure out to don’t commit any injustice, to be absolutely fair. Are they sincere** Maybe most of them are sincere about be happier living in multicultural nations, post-destructed-white-nations, but not about the obvious implications, they seems simply don’t care, against white people.

  169. Vinteuil says:
    @AaronB

    “Nietzsche liked Jews because he shared their world view on a deep level despite surface differences – and Jews have always championed Nietzsche, like Walter Kaufmann.”

    OK, I’ll bite: in what way did Nietzsche share the world view of “Jews?”

    Please be specific. Please cite sources.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  170. @lavoisier

    While your conclusion is broadly true, you need to provide a definition of “genius” – IQ > 140, 145?

    “Their dominance of our culture in virtually every field that has an impact on our lives cannot be due simply to higher intelligence. ”
    ..implying, I presume, that it must be due to some behind-the-scenes manipulation. What about the disproportionate presence of Jews in international chess? In physics, mathematics? In classical music? It is a historical fact that, nearly 100 years ago, major universities, particularly Harvard, had to restrict acceptance of qualified Jewish applicants to maintain an acceptable number of WASP undergraduates. How could the higher number of qualifying Jews be the result of secret manipulation by an all-powerful Jewish cabal?

    It is customary in any discussion of Jewish influence to attempt to pass off innuendo and implication as argument, which is what you are doing here. Possibly counter-arguments are not considered.

    One possibility is that the smooth IQ distribution for whites is not smooth for Jews, but has secondary peaks in the far right hand side. Those familiar with the argument of Cochran, Hardy and Harpending ( “Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence”) will see why this could be true. This would explain disproportionate Ashkenazi Jewish success without recourse to conspiracy or corruption.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @lavoisier
  171. lavoisier says: • Website
    @AaronB

    You are right about this.

    If you read Derbyshire you would think we should just get on our knees and thank God that we have our Jewish superiors controlling us dumb goyim.

    I will be the first to admit that Jews have made a lot of contributions to Western Civilization, particularly in the last fifty years as they have managed to put themselves in positions of power where one can make significant contributions. These contributions are disproportionate to their numbers. They are a smart and talented people.

    But Derbyshire’s abject obeisance to Jewish and Asian superiority is disgusting.

    More importantly, it is simply not true.

    Even the greatest Jewish scientist of all time–Einstein– could not compete with Darwin or Newton, and there are reasons to suspect the ideas he presented were not even his! The major ideas and advances that have made possible Western Civilization were produced by white goyim with a tiny smattering of Jewish contributions–Spinoza comes to mind as does Maimonides. You might even want to include Jesus in that list if you are a religious person.

    I will concede without hesitation that the average Jewish Ashkenazi is smarter than the average goyim. In fact, their smarts may even derive to a large extent from the European component of their genome! But I will not concede that Western Civilization is the result of their unique contributions or that we need their contributions for us to survive and flourish–there is no evidence to believe this.

    If you believe this, as evidently does Derbyshire, you will be of little use in defending Western Civilization or the people who created that civilization.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  172. AaronB says:
    @Vinteuil

    Both Nietzsche and Jews have a power-philosophy, and both are materialistic.

    Their basic assumption is that power is to be desired and is the source of human happiness.

    They both, also, exalt the ego, although that is a corollary.

    They differ only on specifics, but not on values and vision.

    Contrast this with philosophies like Buddhism or Christianity or Sufi Islam which favor the surrender of power and ego and represent the true antithesis to modernity and Talmudic Judaism.

    These are the two timeless tendencies that one finds throughout all history.

    Nietzsche cast himself as the enemy of modernity, but he was in many ways it’s epitome – his fierce polemics are the rage of disappointment. By his time, modernity was losing its original impulse, the desire for power, a process that culimnated in our current malaise.

    Do you disagree with this?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  173. AaronB says:
    @Talha

    Interesting, thanks.

    There has always been a steady stream of high quality westerners converting to Islam, like Guenon and others, especially to Sufism.

    I’m sure it won’t end anytime soon.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  174. AaronB says:
    @lavoisier

    An extremely fair and balanced comment overall except that I would rate Jewish contributions to European civilizations a bit more modestly than you do.

    And I largely agree about Einstein – these ideas were in the air, and while he surely deserves credit for formulating them brilliantly, it’s not on the same level as Newton, who simply invented an entirely new branch of knowledge.

    Guys like Derbyshire, and to some extent Sailer, seem to bow down before success.

    Derb surely knows the relevant math, and he surely knows that in America Jews and Asians are vastly outnumbered by whites in terms of high IQ individuals simply because of numbers – so it’s especially puzzling in his case.

    Worse, his innumerate “set in stone” narrative is likely to demoralize whites further and obscure the true nature of white malaise.

    And yet he is considered a white nationalist champion.

    • Replies: @Talha
  175. AaronB says:
    @Ernest Money

    No, it is you who are failing to consider alternatives to your “merit” theory and engaging in special pleading.

    To rescue the merit theory, we are now discarding the Bell Curve even though it was perfectly adequate when it was thought to support the merit theory.

    Special pleading, indeed.

    Instead of discarding the Bell Curve consider that the world may not be so perfectly organized that merit can explain it. Such a view seems quaintly sentimental.

    The explanation need not be much more sinister than differences in motivation consistent with the cyclical nature of the rise and fall of nations, although there is undoubtedly an element of corruption as well.

    Whites are in a period of malaise, they are demoralized and unmotivated, whereas Jews are in a period of intense motivation.

  176. Talha says:
    @AaronB

    And yet he is considered a white nationalist champion.

    Anyone who is misdiagnosing the disease this late in the game of its metastasizing is a distraction, if not part of the problem.

    Diagnosis; get a second, third or even fourth opinion.

    People also point out that Asians are different – yeah, the first couple of generations are (the guy in the “Hey, hey – this is library!” meme has a thick accent). Let’s see if the next generations can avoid catching whatever’s going around. That will be the trial by fire.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  177. AaronB says:
    @Talha

    People also point out that Asians are different – yeah, the first couple of generations are (the guy in the “Hey, hey – this is library!” meme has a thick accent). Let’s see if the next generations can avoid catching whatever’s going around. That will be the trial by fire.

    Very true, and I’m not optimistic.

    Asians already succumbed to the Western disease on a national scale, so I’m not at all optimistic that they will have any kind of resilience on an individual scale.

    I call modern civilization the Western disease, but really the West was only it’s first victim, and also, its first fatality – it arose within a small group in the West, swiftly metastasized through the entire body of the West, and spread to the whole world.

    No one had the resilience to withstand it, everyone crumbled at the touch of this fatal disease. We are all sick now, just in various stages of decomposition.

    Its only “Western” in the sense that diseases are often named after the first victim they are discovered in.

    In other words, there is no East and West, there is only modern and what is opposed to it.

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @geokat62
  178. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Intelligent Dasein

    If one were to imagine a secret cabal of immensely powerful Jews—Rothschilds or whomever—sitting in a mahogany-clad room, plotting how to enslave and destroy the goyim, one would go far astray. It’s more a case of the general worldview, of which Jews had previously been the best known exemplar, becoming the worldview of the Western elite as well.

    I think that’s a very important insight.

    While the non-Jewish elites have undoubtedly absorbed a lot of Jewish attitudes do you think the Jewish elites may also have absorbed some of the more unpleasant attitudes of the non-Jewish western elites?

    Or could it be that it has nothing to do with Jewishness as such? That it’s just the nature of elites? That all elites end up being pretty similar in worldview?

  179. dfordoom says: • Website
    @unpc downunder

    Britain is being overrun by immigrants for one simple reason. It’s political system does not allow ordinary people to vote specifically on immigration.

    It’s worse than that. Its political system does not give ordinary people a say on any issue.

    The whole point of representative democracy is to stifle the will of the people. That’s why representative democracy was invented.

    Representative democracy is the most shameless and most successful con job in history. And people still fall for it.

  180. Talha says:
    @AaronB

    Its only “Western” in the sense that diseases are often named after the first victim they are discovered in.

    Excellent point!

    In other words, there is no East and West, there is only modern and what is opposed to it.

    I would say post-modern since at least “modern” thought there was some kind of a trajectory – and even that assumption has been deconstructed – thanks Derrida et al!

    I think this is why so many people are pissed off at the Muslims and laugh at us like some relic of the ancient past since we seem to be the only backward, strange ones that just won’t get with the awesome brave-new-world program on a grand scale. That’s OK though, I remember a great quote from Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad (another convert Sufi-scholar):
    And anybody from another ummah who really knows what religion is about, rather than just turning it into another kind of woolly-minded, social service will have nothing but respect for us. They may not agree with us, they may oppose us, but they will respect us because we still see things in proportion; we know what counts. We know that what counts is truth, is Allah (swt). And if the world shouts about us because they don’t like our attitudes to criminal law or to gender or whatever…we are not shouted down, we are never shouted down – we never change because of anybody else protesting. This is the verse in the Bible that the Christians seemed to have forgotten – apart from a few conservatives - “Be not conformed unto this world.”

    Peace.

  181. geokat62 says:
    @AaronB

    I call modern civilization the Western disease…

    Its only “Western” in the sense that diseases are often named after the first victim they are discovered in.

    That’s because the Cultural Marxist virus was released in the West. The more who properly diagnose this disease, the better the chances are of successfully expunging it from our societies.

  182. @AaronB

    Rene Guenon allowed himself to be swallowed by Sufi puntang. Hence his conversion. When white males convert to Islam, they marry black/Asian women. Pure degeneracy.

  183. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Ernest Money

    “It is customary in any discussion of Jewish influence to attempt to pass off innuendo and implication as argument, which is what you are doing here. Possibly counter-arguments are not considered.”

    I have not provided an explanation for the vast Jewish over representation in virtually all cultural organizations that have any influence on our society. I have a number of ideas where that dominance has originated and what has allowed its persistence, first and foremost being nepotism and frank tribal favoritism as well as old fashioned racism and discrimination against the goyim.

    I have merely stated what is true. The absolute number of goyims with IQs above 140 (conventional genius) far exceeds the absolute number of Jewish geniuses. If your argument is that meritocracy can explain the monopoly of Jews in the prestige positions in our society, you will have to tell me what kind of IQ distribution could account for Jews in charge of virtually all media organizations, our largest prestige corporations, our major financial institutions, the federal reserve, and leading think tanks.

    I have acknowledged on average the Jews are smarter. But I am waiting for you to provide a distribution of IQ where the peaks at the right hand side could account for this vast over representation of the Jews.

    Good luck with that one.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
    , @Ernest Money
  184. lavoisier says: • Website
    @lavoisier

    And I agree with Aaron that part of the malaise of the goyim is cultural.

    That malaise is starting to affect Jewish families as well.

    Achievement requires ambition. A sense of purpose.

  185. @Anonymous

    The British recently voted in a referendum on whether they wanted more European immigration. (They voted no).

    On the specific point, unpc downunder was correct: Britain’s “political system does not allow ordinary people to vote specifically on immigration”.

    The referendum was on whether they wanted to “remain” in the EU or to “leave”. A majority voted “leave”. It was not a yes/no question.

    There was nothing on the ballot paper inviting their opinions on immigration.

  186. @AaronB

    “Contrast this with philosophies like Buddhism or Christianity or Sufi Islam which favor the surrender of power and ego and represent the true antithesis to modernity and Talmudic Judaism.” WOW!!! The comments for this article have been so cucked and bizarre, I can’t even!!!

    I like Mark Steyn’s writings. His writings about music are great. I do remember him being more neoconish, but he has changed a lot about this. His focus is on the West. If he is Jewish, he is definitely less than 1/8. Remember, the Nazis said anyone less than 1/8 Jewish was not Jewish. Also, he has suffered a great deal from having problems with free speech and his writings in Canada. He has a lawsuit concerning climate change that is surely costing him thousands and thousands of dollars, but he said he will fight to win.

    This talk about philosophies which represent this and that are subordinate to biology. Remember, biology first, beliefs second. And what is the most objective, reliable marker of biology that helps in the formation of philosophies? IQ. And what is the natural order of IQ? Caucasians, Asians, blacks.

    This wicked Muslim/innocent Jews blathering is skirting around the real issue. It is the RCC/Zioevangizers/Freemasons that are causing the problems. And now this troika is going to have to deal with the fallout from their evil beliefs with Trump’s designating Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. This was an excellent decision. This is the first step in setting limits to Israel’s boundaries. It antagonizes Muslims and cuck pope Frannie – people I despise. And it will destroy the Zioevangizers and their rapture nonsense. The third temple will never be rebuilt. Julian the Apostate was the last person to try this. An earthquake ended this. There are tectonic plates around the Jerusalem. If the Zioevangizers and Hassids try to rebuild the temple, there will be another earthquake. There will be lots of dead Jews and Muslims. The Zioevangizers will be gone. The RCC will be almost entirely gone from the USA by 2020. Right now the homosexual bishops and priests are busy looting the RCC. They know the jig is up. I still am a Christian and do believe in God, but IQ has shown that Christianity cannot work for blacks/Asians, the races with the lowest IQs. Hopefully, this will force the Europeans to deal with the papacy. From the comments I have read, people do not want to deal with these realities. It is the usual “blame the Jews” excuse. It is the usual “spirituality” will save us nonsense. No, it is the hard core realization of IQ, its relation to race and the necessity for separation.

    • Replies: @Vinteuil
  187. wayfarer says:

    Abrahamism, bringing empty enlightenment to a neighborhood near you!
    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions

  188. @Anonymous

    I am really really sorry but interest free money is a nonsense.
    Banks itself have a overhead. That has to be paid from interest. Banks have an employs. those have to be paid from interest. Some loans become sour. Those have to be compensated from interest.
    The government could slow down transfer of purchasing capital to investment capital.
    It is possible to do but it is complicated. But increase of purchasing power is dangerous also, because it accelerates inflation.
    The matter is very complicated, particularly now when business and financial systems are intertwined all over the world.
    In this system as in any system there are winners and losers.
    And US is not only looser. US is a big looser.

  189. @lavoisier

    “I have merely stated what is true. The absolute number of goyims with IQs above 140 (conventional genius) far exceeds the absolute number of Jewish geniuses. ”

    With which I agree, as I said. I believe the correct plural of goy is “goyim”.

    “If your argument is that meritocracy can explain the monopoly of Jews in the prestige positions in our society”

    Clearly I attempted no such explanation. It is simply that some of the facts about Jewish success do not appear to fit into any non-merit model, facts that you must know but did NOT consider. I suppose I have to repeat myself:

    What about the disproportionate presence of Jews in international chess? In physics, mathematics? In classical music? It is a historical fact that, nearly 100 years ago, major universities, particularly Harvard, had to restrict acceptance of qualified Jewish applicants to maintain an acceptable number of WASP undergraduates. How could the higher number of qualifying Jews be the result of secret manipulation by an all-powerful Jewish cabal?

    If there exist areas of disproportionate Jewish success where corruption or ethnocentrism or whatever cannot be the cause, then we cannot reject the merit hypothesis.

    “I am waiting for you to provide a distribution of IQ where the peaks at the right hand side could account for this vast over representation of the Jews.”

    Get used to disappointment. But read the paper I cited if you have not already done so.

    “And I agree with Aaron that part of the malaise of the goyim is cultural.”

    But if malaise theory is true, how come Jews performed so well a hundred years ago relative to WASPs that the Ivies had explicitly to deny them entry? Was Goy Malaise Syndrome active even then? If so, it must have been well advanced by the mid 1940′s. How could the US win what were essentially two separate major wars in Europe and the Pacific against clever, determined adversaries if the bulk of its population was in the throes of GMS? No, if GMS is real, it started in the sixties.

  190. Druid says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    You would be surprised about that neighbourhood dentist. His cheque to AIPAC is always on time!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  191. polskijoe says:

    I think one of the few things which might help
    would be for the Vatican to continue ecumenism, return back to before Vatican2 on several other issues
    and have much better relations with Orthodox. (its kinda doing it but lightly).

    There were CIA connections at least historically Reagan and before.
    And the Catholic Church is so split. Wish they got rid of all the guity priests and reduced the homo population.

    May be too late. Who knows.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  192. @Ernest Money

    I could believe you. But why Jews always were attracted to highest developed western European countries like Germany England and France. Why they did not go to African countries and perform their miracles there. After all progress in those countries according to you would be really phenomenal.
    But it is not late the chance is still open lets see them to do it!

  193. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Ernest Money

    “If there exist areas of disproportionate Jewish success where corruption or ethnocentrism or whatever cannot be the cause, then we cannot reject the merit hypothesis.”

    What are those areas where corruption or ethnocentrism is not at work? What you are stating here is obviously true assuming that corruption or ethnocentrism is not at work. But first you would have to demonstrate the specific fields of endeavor where such a situation exists.

    “Clearly I attempted no such explanation. It is simply that some of the facts about Jewish success do not appear to fit into any non-merit model, facts that you must know but did NOT consider. I suppose I have to repeat myself:”

    Clearly you did when you suggested that skew at the right hand side of the normal distribution for IQ could account for the overwhelming dominance of Jews in various intellectual endeavors such as mathematics, classical music, chess. And if it could account for the dominance in these fields, why not finance, media, and the Ivy League?

    There is no reasonable distribution of IQ scores across ethnic groups that could account for the vastly disproportionate dominance of Jewish individuals in virtually every cultural dimension of American life today. And you should not have brought this matter up if you were unwilling or unable to defend your claim that such a distribution could account for a meritocracy.

    If there were such a distribution, I would gladly acknowledge that Jewish dominance is well earned. Until that time, I look at the absolute numbers of geniuses and remain troubled by the incredible dominance of one ethnic group in virtually every cultural activity of significance in our society. This dominance will have very significant effects on a society and its culture–and not all of those effects are benign.

    I do not believe that overwhelming Jewish dominance has been earned honestly and is strictly meritocratic, and I do not believe that this dominance is good for the United States or the West.

  194. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @lavoisier

    While the Ashkenazi, are, on average, smarter than the average goyim by about 10 IQ points

    That’s wrong. The average IQ in Israel is 95 ( https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country/il-israel ). If we take into account that the low IQ Muslims are “spoiling” the result and discard them from the equation – Jews score only 98. Meanwhile, the UK, without any adjustments (the country contains ~20% non-white immigrants) has an average IQ of 100 ( https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country/gb-united-kingdom ). All in all, it looks like the white British goyim are ~5 IQ points smarter than the Jews.

    “But muh Ashkenazi!” – Wait a minute, why are we cherry picking a sub-group now? British whites already have a 5 point advantage. Which white UK sub-group should we pick to compensate? Besides, Ashkenazi Jews are the majority Jews in Israel. The 110 number simply doesn’t fit. And it also doesn’t fit genetically, eugenically or empirically. If you want to argue that the Western MSM, politics, banking, education and Hollywood are run by smart people go ahead but it’s clear (to me) that they’re failing under the weight of incompetence and hubris. Institutionalised nepotism always leads to these kinds of results since it’s deeply anti-meritocratic.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
    , @polskijoe
  195. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Druid

    It would be interesting to see a detailed list of the people who have donated to BLM and similar groups.

  196. @Anon-og

    I’m sorry. I work like 60 hours a week so I don’t blog anymore. And when I do write something, it isn’t really my best so I don’t want to put it out there. But you’re right; I should get on the ball.

    • Replies: @anonguy
  197. @Ernest Money

    Why should I include all groups that support amnesty? I do not deny plenty of Christian loonies support amnesty and a rapid invasion and replacement, for religious reasons.

    The difference is Jews have way deeper pockets and are immensely better connected and organised. They know exceptionally well how to lobby effectively to stir policy changes.

    The Christian Church is dying, less and less Westerners are religious, therefore their capacity to pressure and lobby is less and less.

    Not the case with organised Jewry. Either secular or religious they unite and stick together, thanks to the Holocaust, Israel and the perception of being eternally persecuted because of being superior – envy – which have become part of their identity. They have connections to MSM, Hollywood propaganda machine, governments, academia, think tanks and already have powerful and highly effective lobbies. They even have activist organizations to brainwash kids and instruct them how to lobby against racism and xenophobia. Meet the ADC (Australia’s ADL):

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/07/19/the-jewish-war-on-white-australia-the-anti-defamation-commission-and-click-against-hate-part-2-of-4/

    Not to talk about their access to virtually unlimited funding, and being virtually untouchable.

    Proof is anyone can make fun nowadays of any religion. Now you try to make fun of the Holocaust or Jewish privilege.

    So your whataboutism, i.e. trying to compare the political power and influence of Christian loonies to organised Jewry is, to put it mildly, ludicrous.

  198. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    There is a lot of truth in what you say.

    Any system or institution that discriminates against talent will eventually fail as competence and creativity becomes a liability.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  199. AaronB says:
    @Ernest Money

    But if malaise theory is true, how come Jews performed so well a hundred years ago relative to WASPs that the Ivies had explicitly to deny them entry? Was Goy Malaise Syndrome active even then? If so, it must have been well advanced by the mid 1940′s. How could the US win what were essentially two separate major wars in Europe and the Pacific against clever, determined adversaries if the bulk of its population was in the throes of GMS? No, if GMS is real, it started in the sixties.

    You are looking at this far too simplistically.

    Malaise is a process, a trend, a trajectory – it has stages, it does not appear all at once. It’s like a disease.

    The Japanese certainly saw evidence of white malaise – they thought whites were already soft and decadent, and it was a huge factor in their decision to start the war.

    It is extremely misleading to compare war to social ambition.

    Malaise may exist in an advanced enough state to sap social ambition, but there may be enough reserves of will power left to rouse a population to energetic action if there is a sufficiently strong motivation.

    In other words – strength of provocation matters, and and it is silly to conclude that because someone was motivated to go to war he would be equally motivated to climb the social ladder.

    In advanced states of decay, of course, a person may not even rouse himself to self-defense, as we see today.

    Of course, the malaise had not not become so advanced yet, and the Japanese miscalculated.

    In Europe, white malaise entered an advanced stage after WW2, in America the decisive point was reached after Vietnam.

    White malaise accelerated in the late 19th century, and Jewish motivation probably peaked in the early to mid 20th century.

    To get an idea of white malaise, read European thought and literature starting about 1800 – it is an astonishing, probably unique, record of accelerating morale-sapping self disgust.

    How anyone can fail to consider this as a factor when assessing white decline is beyond me.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  200. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @lavoisier

    True. It’s the curse of the “secret” societies. They (might) start as watering holes for the “best of the best” but those principles quickly fall prey to entropy, greed and Chronos. Most members just want to pass the crutch to their kids and live on an easy (dysgenic) street. In a couple of generations you end up with 95 IQ “elite” trying to rule over 1oo IQ “plebs”. This is where we are.

  201. AaronB says:
    @Ernest Money

    What about the disproportionate presence of Jews in international chess? In physics, mathematics? In classical music?

    How is any of this inconsistent with the theory of white malaise? Uh, all these activities require tremendous motivation, and chess, and classical music, are heavily socially motivated.

    Ron Unz has demonstrated recent steep decline in Jewish performance – Jews barely place anymore on the most prestigious math and physics prizes, when the used to dominate a short time ago.

    A mystery. I cannot imagine what is going on.

    Clearly, Jews are in the first early stages of their own malaise, hardly felt as yet outside the rarefied heights of physics and math – an entirely predictable development if one knows anything of history.

    National a rise, then fall, and history is cyclical.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  202. anarchyst says:
    @polskijoe

    You are correct. The Vatican II “Ecumenical Council” was a mistake…
    The “beginning of the end” of Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants.
    Much Catholic ritual was discarded, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their “dirty work” for them…
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Cardinal Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back” against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize celebration of pre-Vatican II principles.

  203. Mark Steyn has the brains and looks to be a successful commentator and he knows that the pro-Israel, anti-Muslim bit sells and any criticism of it would likely end his career. “Mark’s not a Jew but he plays one on TV” as one Israeli moderator put it wickedly. I don’t know how much money he makes, but it’s a hell of a lot more than anyone who knocks Israel. It’s a shame that certain opinions, though far from universally held, cannot be challenged without throwing away one’s livelihood, typically forever. Mr. Unz should devote his astronomical IQ to figuring out how to create genuine open debate within the commercially viable media. As it stands the only pushback on certain topics comes from people who aren’t making any money and are often fruitcakes.

  204. @AaronB

    John Derbyshire has helpfully introduced the topic of importing an overclass – first Ashkenazi Jews, then Asians, and who’s next? As one who remembers the early post-war period, the transition from a WASP to a Jewish elite has had many dismaying effects, above all the assault on Christianity and the first and second amendments. I do not see a large biological component in culture, but as it turns out one can make certain educated guesses about cultural loyalties on the basis of ethnic history. Jews are indeed superior on average, not just at verbal tasks but at spatial ones as well, e.g. chess. If Jews don’t win as many Nobel Prizes as they used to it’s probably because they are too busy running hedge funds and movie studios. On the other hand, Hispanics are Christians and, like blacks, lack enthusiasm for feminism, gay marriage, and trans-gender bathrooms. In my experience Hispanics are polite and unthreatening though I am troubled by what I read about La Violencia many years ago. The behavior and social effects that people on the paleo-right object to regarding blacks, Hispanics, and Asians would easily be controlled if they were not opposed every step of the way by Jews, who seem bent on turning the US into a society too diverse and secular to push back against Jewish interests. This strategy could backfire, of course, as some Jews have realized. The late Irving Kristol once commented that he wanted “Christians to be Christians, [because] a society where Jews could be Jews but Christians could not be Christians might not be such a great thing for Jews.”

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @AaronB
  205. @AaronB

    Interesting concept. Do you include Britain with ‘Europe’ and which works of literature or other works would provide examples of the malaise phenomenon. Certainly the industrial revolution shook people up and so did the French Revolution. It would have been bizarre if they didn’t. But where in literature would I look for the malaise?

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @AaronB
  206. My reply to utu # 133, since none of the buttons work for me any longer.

    If you have to ask, you’ll never understand.

    Thanks to those who offered to explain it, but it’s obviously a case of being obtuse, no doubt partly willful.

  207. Talha says:
    @jack daniels

    Some good comments there – thanks! Unfortunate that the Paleo-Right is undermined so much.

    Peace.

  208. DaveE at 163, thanks!

    My commenting is done until the various “buttons” on this site are functional again.

    You are correct in all you say and there is so much that could be said, but the basic problem with utu and similar ilk is that they don’t want to understand that even with the privileges the little Jew gets, they still have little in common with the big financial elite, but they still have more advantages than the dumb goyim.

    After all, the big boys probably desire some support from some of us peons.

    Keep up the good fight!

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  209. AaronB says:
    @jack daniels

    Get a good literary history – start with the Romantics, particularly the Germans, then the fin de siecle French authors like Baudelaire, Huysmans, Rimbaud, etc, then onto the existentialists.

    Everyone was talking about decline, exhaustion, nihilism, self disgust. The culture was saturated with it.

    See Nietzsche – the whole point of his philosophy was to reverse the incredible decadence he saw around him.

    Extra bonus for western “refugees” to exotic cultures, like Sir Francis Burton, and Rimbaud, who wrote quite eloquently about their disgust with life in the West.

    The documentation is exhaustive – it’s remarkable that all this is ignored today, and it’s so if our decline set in after WW2. No civilization before has left do complete a record of its growing self-disgust.

    • Replies: @Anon
  210. AaronB says:
    @jack daniels

    Yes, I would emphatically include Britain with Europe.

  211. AaronB says:
    @jack daniels

    Yes things have gotten very bad, and they will only get worse unless we correctly diagnose the problem and face it.

    But distractions and tendentious arguments like we see from Derbyshire that ignore facts do not help.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  212. anonguy says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    I’m sorry. I work like 60 hours a week so I don’t blog anymore. And when I do write something, it isn’t really my best so I don’t want to put it out there. But you’re right; I should get on the ball.

    You are a good writer.

  213. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    The Oded Yinon project, plus oil reserves plus MIC profits, are to blame for the slaughter of 4 million civilians of all ages in the Middle East.
    American ziocons have been the driving force behind the various interventions in the Middle East. The illegal Iraq war? – Wolfowitz, Perle, Krustol, Feith, Kagans, Ledeen… the list is long and ugly. And do not forget the bloody Madeleine Albright approving the death of 500.000 Iraqi children.
    The Israel-loyal Clinton has got prominence with her “democracy on the march” in Libya; her emails revealed that Israel was on her mind re the destruction of Libya.
    Israel has been cooperating with ISIS against the sovereign state of Syria and Israel continues attacking Syria.
    Every time your lot whines and cries, “Look the other ways!” the ziocons’ misdeeds become only more obvious. Moreover, the destruction of the formerly functioning states in the Middle East has created waves of refugees and economic migrants (the latter are mostly low-IQ young men from sub-Saharan Africa), which are tearing apart the European civilization.
    Congratulations. Where is your tribe is planning to find another host to devour in the name of the “chosen” and the “promised land?”

  214. Ron Unz says:
    @jacques sheete

    My commenting is done until the various “buttons” on this site are functional again.

    That’s very odd about your software problems. It definitely sounds like you’re getting a Javascript error in your browser, which would disable those buttons and the other functions you mentioned. Everything’s working for numerous other commenters, and no one else has complained, so it sounds like it might be local to your device.

    I’d suggest that you clear your browser caches and make sure your device is downloading the latest JS files. If you’re somewhat more technically knowledgeable, try using the “Inspect” function on a Chrome or Firefox browser, and see if you are indeed getting JS errors, then let me know where they’re occurring.

    • LOL: Vinteuil
  215. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Baudelaire “fin de siecle”? Is there some other Baudelaire I haven’t heard of?

    • Replies: @AaronB
  216. AaronB says:
    @Anon

    Nope, there’s the one and only :)

    Do you think Baudelaire, and writers like him, are relevant data when assessing the causes of white decline?

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  217. polskijoe says:
    @Anonymous

    Here is the IQs of Jews:

    Askhenazim: 110
    Sephardi: 97
    Mizrahi: 92

    Askhenazi (full and partial) in Israel: around 45%
    Sephardi/Mizrahi descent (50%)
    some of them mixed.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @bjondo
  218. Obviously not all Jews favor opens borders and mass immigration. But disproportionately many do, and if you look at who is pushing for ever more immigration, a high fraction are Jews, many times their 2-3% of the population. The heavily Jewish promotion of diversity (fewer whites) is probably the biggest cause of antisemitism among people who are pro-white.

  219. Vinteuil says:
    @attilathehen

    “I still am a Christian and do believe in God, but IQ has shown that Christianity cannot work for blacks/Asians, the races with the lowest IQs.”

    Trolling doesn’t get much trollier than this.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  220. dfordoom says: • Website
    @AaronB

    Do you think Baudelaire, and writers like him, are relevant data when assessing the causes of white decline?

    Take a look at western art. By the late 19th century the idea that art should celebrate beauty and truth and life was considered hopelessly old-fashioned. The new western art would celebrate ugliness, squalor, misery, death and degradation.

    And it was a trend that started in the 19th century. Painters stopped painting goddesses and started painting prostitutes.

    Even in music there was a trend away from beautiful music to ugly disturbing music in the 20th century.

  221. @Vinteuil

    Vinteuil: you are a functional illiterate. For another article, I commented to Truth that God owes us. He has to let us in on the cosmic joke. You liked this comment.

    So, that’s why I believe in God because I want answers. Christianity is the best religion because it works best with natural law. I don’t need religion to argue against gay marriage, polygamy, most divorce and most abortion. Natural law shows these are evolutionary degenerate things (sins, evils).

    There is evidence that Christianity does not work for blacks/Asians:

    which country is better: RCC Philippines or Shinto/Buddhist Japan?

    which country is better: RCC Haiti or Protestant Iceland?

    which country is better: RCC El Salvador or WASP USA?

    In fact, blacks in the USA have been Christian for hundreds of years and this has not improved them.

    God has lots of ‘splaining to do.

  222. AaronB says:

    Yes, when the West lost its connection to the Spirit, life lost its savour, and morale collapsed.

    This manifested across all cultural fields.

    BTW, I read your post about the incompatibility of capitalism and Christianity – excellent, and very true.

    It’s incredible to me how anyone can not see that – to me, it’s an example of how Christianity has been interpreted to mean the opposite of what it did originally.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  223. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @polskijoe

    As I’ve explained, the 110 number doesn’t make any sense (genetically, eugenically or empirically). It comes from Richard Lynn’s book and it obviously clashes with Israel’s average IQ being 95 – as measured by… Richard Lynn using culture-fair testing.

  224. utu says:
    @DaveE

    I was told by a Jew that many chosenites are not required to even repay their loans

    Do you believe it?

    This remind of Mr. White getting a loan 3:39m

  225. AaronB says:
    @AaronB

    This was supposed to be a reply for dfordoom.

  226. bjondo says:

    kicked out and inbred
    walls, walls, walls
    between jew and humans

    steyn identifies and proclaims as a jew
    moved from canada
    specifically to promote iraq war
    for israel
    his country

  227. bjondo says:
    @polskijoe

    IQ of jew
    when not taking jew IQ test
    when not tutored by test maker
    when not given bonus points for being jew
    between 75 and 83

  228. jack ryan says: • Website
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    The J elites have power in specific ways.

    The American Mainstream Media is dominated by a J media mafia. The only Goy who has owned, ran a major television news network in my lifetime was Ted Turner (Turner Broadcasting, CNN). When Ted Turner merged Turner Broadcasting/CNN with Geral Levin’s Time Warner Inc – Ted Turner basically disappeared from public life and now CNN is 24/7 fake news, hate White people, promote Neo Con wars against Russia, secular Arabs.

    My God former AIPAC Lobbyist Wolf Blitzer is main talking head, Jeff Zucker the CEO commutes to Tel Aviv.

  229. @Blake

    This piece is so vile on so many levels. It’s cause and effect which is causing the refugee problem. Don’t cause chaos in the region and there wouldn’t be people fleeing. And nowhere in Europe are Muslims trying to dispossess the Europeans of their land. You cannot tarbrush an entire community for the behaviour of a few. We don’t blame all Christians for the crimes of a few so it’s double standards.

    Exactly. They are doing to others what they accuse SJWs and feminists of doing. They just pick different groups onto which to project their insecurities and self-loathing. No healthy person thinks there exists a race, gender, culture or religion that is 100% bad and evil and corrupt. That is irrational and should be treated as a mental illness.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  230. .

    Probably the shabbiest ever pile of drivel seen anywhere on the internet.

    Packed with lame links, cranky logic and blinkered babble.

    Not to mention so much sick in the head anti-Jew paranoia.

    Reading such utter nutjobbery makes me want to vomit.

    Rated: beyond pathetic.

    .

  231. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III

    No healthy person thinks there exists a race, gender, culture or religion that is 100% bad and evil and corrupt.

    Both you and Blake sound clueless. Muslims are aggressively dispossessing Europeans in their (growing) enclaves and no one here fits that “100% bad” straw-man you’re selling.

    So what’s the deal here? Are you uninformed, slow or dishonest? You can choose all three.

    • Replies: @Anon
  232. Bischkva says:

    Just when I thought I’d heard it all an article like this comes along. The author (I don’t want to give him links by naming him) blames dystopic European Islamisation on…drum roll, please…The Jews. It’s always about The Jews, isn’t it? Did he fail to mention that Steyn is a crypto-Jew? Always gotta watch out for them.

  233. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Grumbledog

    Ok, Comic Book Guy.

  234. @Grumbledog

    Go to 0:39 seconds, you disgusting POS.

  235. @Bischkva

    See comment 243 link and cut the whining, you POS.

    • Replies: @Bischkva
  236. Bischkva says:
    @The Goyim are wising up

    Sure how stupid of me. Because this nutzo broad (who looks Semetic) says so it must be true. The reason Jews are leaving Scandinavia, France, Belgium, etc. in droves is because they’re at the center of Europe’s islamization. Their dastardly plan is to rule those countries…in absentia. When your only tool is a hammer every problem looks like a nail. When your only philosophic argument is hebe-hatred every problem looks like a Jew.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  237. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    “Are you uninformed, slow or dishonest? You can choose all three.”

    1. PNAC – Have you heard of the Projects and its authors and their ethnicity?
    2. Oded Yinon plan — have you read the article or any analysis of the plan?
    3. Ever heard and watched this? –

    “General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned – Seven Countries In Five Years”

    What makes you so vile against your Middle Eastern cousins? And why you are pushing the western civilization to solve your tribal animosities?
    Clinton the Butcheress of Libya has been a loyal Israel-firster. According to Wikileaks, her main concern re destruction of Libya and murder of Quaddaffi was Israel’s security. It was your brainless Jewish plan of ruining the secular Arab states (see Yinon plan) that has opened the gates of hell and brought the waves of low IQ African migrants to Europe, as well as the crowds of people dispossessed of their livelihood in their native countries of the Middle East.
    Are four (4) million of dead civilians of all ages not enough for your tribe? http://www.mintpressnews.com/4-million-muslims-killed-in-western-wars-should-we-call-it-genocide/208711/ — Or you prefer even more tiny coffins for the “little snakes?” (Ayelet Shaked, Israel’s justice minister)
    No war, no refugees. Your Sarkozy (Jewish) – a bomber of Libya, your Wolfowitz (Jewish) – the main pusher for the illegal war in Iraq, your ziocon cabal whose spokesperson (and organizer of special tours for very special American tourists to Israel) recently proclaimed that the US military is zionist – they are not mentally healthy indeed. http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2017/11/have-the-us-militry-gone-zionist.html

  238. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Bischkva

    It’s obvious that European Jews didn’t realize Muslims would turn on them. They just assumed Muslims and Nazis would fight each other and both would leave the Jews alone. Unintended consequences.

    • Replies: @Bischkva
  239. Bischkva says:
    @Anonymous

    More Jew-Jew-Jah-Jah. So European Jews expected that a demographic that has hated them for centuries, which despises them from Indonesia to Morocco, which calls for their death and annihilation from Teheran, which decapitates them in Lahore, suicide-bombs them in Argentina, etc. etc. etc., to welcome them as brothers on the streets of Brussels? BTW how many European leaders over the past 30 years have been Jews? Just askin’. Don’t tell me: Angela Merkel’s real name is Miriam Goldschmidberg-hebe-stein. Another crypto-Jew. Don’t look now there’s a Jew under your bed.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anonymous
  240. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Bischkva

    Did you read the article? Your (presumptive) co-ethnics were big supporters of mass immigration. Why? I don’t know. Because racism=Holocaust or something equally incomprehensible. Maybe IQ isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.

    • Replies: @Bischkva
  241. Bischkva says:
    @Anon

    First of all you presume wrong. I’ll let your IQ comment go as I’m not sure whether you’re referring to me or Jews but I’ll say this: High IQs don’t immunize anyone from drink-the-kool-aid fanaticism. In fact the smarter someone is the more likely they will twist reality to conform to their beliefs.

    I’m very aware of “the Jewish” problem of ultra-liberalism to the point of self-annihilation. Yup 90+% voted for Hillary. I know, I know. I also am very aware of the holocaust industry, thank you. The fact that George Soros backs muslim immigration doesn’t mean that Schlomo Glickberg, deli owner in Marseilles, is happy about it. George Soros and the loony Jewish left, like that lady in the video, are misanthropes. They hate humanity. To assume that that means “the jews” orchestrated the demographic demolition of Europe is absurd, however. Rank and file Jews are as horrified as you and I are that they can no longer walk down the street in Malmo without being harassed by 3rd world savages. I know many Israelis, 90% of whom, whether liberal or conservative, would kick every single muslim out of Israel if they could. If they could press a button and have it done they’d do it. Yet there are leftist Israelis that essentially push the Soros agenda of self-destruction. This shit is a lot more complex than blaming Jews, dude.

  242. lavoisier says: • Website
    @AaronB

    Derbyshire has been miserable on this subject.

    His abject failure to address the negative consequences of Jewish monopoly on virtually all areas of Western culture is disturbing.

    Derb can identify black pathologies and the dangers of massive Third World Immigration, but he never explores the source of these problems in the first place.

    This demonstrates a fundamental dishonesty in the man and a lack of courage.

    When it comes to the Jews, Derbyshire is worse than worthless.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  243. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Bischkva

    Why should Jews living in countries (they think are) full of Nazis care about these things? Nazis are the major threat. Nazis Nazis Nazis. Swedish Nazis are so terrifying that even Jew-hating Muslims will learn to hate Nazis instead. That is/was the logic anyway.

    Intelligence is often equated with wisdom, but the two really are different things.

  244. Bischkva says:

    I thought Unz readers were thoughtful. I was wrong. Bye.

    • Replies: @Anon
  245. AaronB says:
    @lavoisier

    Derb is not honest about Jews, he’s not honest about Asians, and he’s not honest about what I call “white malaise”.

    I’ve been struggling to understand his motivations.

    As far as I can make out, he seems to believe that all humans share the same motivations and psychological make up – this being so, ability can be the only remaining variable contributing to real world outcomes.

    Since Jews, Asians, and Whites are equally motivated to achieve social success and wealth, and will utilize the same methods in so doing, it stands to reason that differences in real world outcomes can only reflect differences in ability.

    What seems strange to me is the force of this initial assumption – its so strong that he’ll just ignore the science of IQ and how it manifestly does not support our current ethnic spread.

    So what gives? Why is someone so commutter to logic, science, and numbers being so obtuse here?

    What’s more, I’ve noticed that this belief that ability is the major variable and people are substantially the same is widespread among modern types who care a lot about math and science.

    Why?

    But wait!

    Derb will happily admit in other contexts that people differ in psychological make up, like when he thinks blacks are prone to violence.

    He just won’t apply it when it comes to success within a modern technological society – to acknowledge that people will differ on how much they value that, and what methods they’ll be prepared to use to get it, that would be to question the very foundations of his own value system – and that, few men are prepared to do.

    So Derb is hemmed in by his devotion to modern society and it’s technology and won’t be subjecting his assumptions to rational scrutiny any time soon.

    What is axiomatic cannot be questioned, and progress will come only either the passing of the old generation.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  246. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Bischkva

    I’m puzzled as to what upsets you so. Yes, the IQ comment was about Jews. If you spend much time talking to one (other than a personal friend) he is certain to bring it up, which makes it fair game.

    Again, I’m unsure from where your anger at the article is coming. There are legitimate reasons to deplore some of its emphases, but this doesn’t seem to be your issue.

    Sorry I’m not thoughtful enough for you. Must be my IQ …

    • Replies: @Bischkva
  247. Bischkva says:
    @Anon

    I also know and have worked with many Jews. Never heard a single one refer to his or her IQ. I’m beginning to see what’s going on in this thread. In a recent podcast John Derbyshire nicely summed up the difference between antipathy, dislike, mistrust, suspicion, wariness, fear, etc., and HATRED. According to Derb (who btw was ambivalent to moving the embassy to Jerusalem, FYI). The secret sauce, which is relevant to the IQ question, is that those lesser negative emotions exist among and between groups of all kinds. Hatred is almost exclusively exhibited by a group that perceives itself to be the inferior of another group. Derb’s example was the white/black dynamic. Although many race realists hold certain entirely justified (although they don’t have to be) reservations about blacks few whites actually HATE blacks. OTOH examples of black hatred towards whites are rampant.

    The anti-Jewish comments I see here, and on Vdare, and in Taki’s magazine, probably have a similar origin. Jews are smarter than Europeans, who are smarter than Africans. Jews built a country out of the desert while the arabs still pound sand and kill their daughters for showing their ankles in public. Burns your ass, doesn’t it? Even when surrounded (and no doubt with our help) those &##$(*&# Jews succeed. It’s unfair isn’t it? But surely, you’ll say, because they exploit those poor Palestinians. Let me tell you something about the Palestinians. Like a certain ethnic group in our country that will go nameless, Palestinians view themselves as eternal victims. Nothing bad that happens is ever their fault. Israel only exists because the poor Palestinians are brutalized by the cold-hearted Jew.

    I have news for you (and them): Were the Palestinians’ adversaries been anyone BUT Jews, had they been Russian or Saudi or Egyptian, for all the shit they’ve pulled there wouldn’t be a single Palestianian alive today. The very term would be unknown except to scholars of long-lost civilizations.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Anon
    , @Malla
  248. AaronB says:
    @Bischkva

    That’s rather ridiculous and self serving.

    People hate those who have wronged them, oppressed them, cheated them, exploited them.

    Technically, someone who has cheated or wronged you has made himself your “superior”, even if he’s naturally your inferior, but an oppressor is hated for his oppression, not his “superiority”, which is often, though not always, circumstantial and not intrinsic.

    There are plenty of whites who HATE blacks. Intense hatred of blacks is also quite common among Jews, btw.

    Besides, few groups actually see themselves as inferior – they all focus on that area where they excel as the most relevant.

    Mexicans, for instance, hardly see themselves as inferior to whites – they see their warm fun loving culture with familial values and great cuisine as vastly superior to Anglo culture, and are apt to pity Anglos.

    Anglos, of course, see their ability to create technology and be well organized and efficient as the primary human values, and pity Mexicans.

    Chacun a son gout – but it really is a human comedy, and it’s worth trying to get into the skin of the other and see the world from his pov.

    • Replies: @Bischkva
  249. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Bischkva

    You brought up the Pals, not me. As for viewing themselves as eternal victims, they’re hardly alone. (And they are objectively victims, if not in such a very great degree.)

    You must know different Jews than I do, and read different internet mags. OK by me, but since you’re the one who can’t take a one-sentence ethnic joke I don’t see why I’m the one with the “burnt ass”…

  250. Bischkva says:
    @AaronB

    Self serving? Where did I mention myself or anyone like me?

    You’re confusing those other negative emotions with hate. Big difference between the “knockout game” and writing an essay urging the repatriation of all blacks back to Africa. Look at the interracial crime stats. Look at the marginalization of white (males).

    Mexicans don’t hate us because, actually, they’re not inferior in any way and they know it. Get an appendectomy in Mexico, or fly the airline, or take a PhD in physics, or hire a construction firm to build you a factory and the honchos are all Mexican. Ditto almost all the ‘spanic countries. Now find me a functioning black-majority country where natives do that stuff. There aren’t any. That same resentment, feeling of inferiority, is the basis of anti-jew bullshit in this article. It’s more subtle because there’s not THAT much difference between whites and Jews, but it’s the same shit.

    Anti-semitism is the whites’ version of honkey-baiting by blacks.

    • Replies: @Malla
  251. lavoisier says: • Website
    @AaronB

    I agree that motivation is key. And I agree with your posts that Western Civilization is suffering from a profound spiritual malaise that is sapping the spirit of creativity and innovation.

    My main argument with Derbyshire is what I consider to be his profound dishonesty regarding the damage that has been done to Western Civilization by the Jewish hatred of the goyim.

    The man is out to lunch on the harm this has caused.

    This glaring failure on his part is why I do not consider him to be an honest and courageous man or a writer who can lead us out of the wilderness.

    It is not necessary to hate Jews. But one should be honest about their significant contributions to Western Civilization while simultaneously recognizing the significant damage they have done to European nations, their cultures, and their people.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @AaronB
  252. geokat62 says:
    @lavoisier

    It is not necessary to hate Jews. But one should be honest about their significant contributions to Western Civilization while simultaneously recognizing the significant damage they have done to European nations, their cultures, and their people.

    Have you heard of Derbyshire’s Law?

    Yes, indeed I was, and am, “afraid of offending Jews.” Of course I am! For a person like myself, a Gentile who is a very minor name in American opinion journalism, desirous of ascending to some slightly less minor status, ticking off Jews is a very, very bad career strategy. – excerpt from Wrestling with Derbyshire’s Law, a dialogue with Joey Kurtzman:

    http://jewcy.com/post/wrestling_with_derbyshires_law

  253. AaronB says:
    @lavoisier

    I agree with you 100% here.

    It’s utterly dishonest to ignore the extremely negative effects Jews have had on Western culture, and that its motivated by hatred of goyim.

    I know Jewish of hatred of goyim first hand – this past week I was at an orthodox Jewish friends house, and he was waxing lyrical about how there is an old prophecy that Europeans and Muslims will destroy each other, and how wonderful to see it happening in Europe now.

    When I suggested all people should be happy and free from pain, he immediately assented, but an hour later was back to his gory tribal reveries, completely oblivious.

    This is how it is, and whites need to wake up about it. I can tell you as someone with inside access Jews are not your friends.

    As you say this does not have to lead to hatred – tribalism is normal even if it needs to be transcended in a higher spiritual perspective, and Europeans recently thought the same way – but it must lead to realism and an honest facing of the facts.

    Derb is a Social Darwinist who admires success – in an inchoate way success represents “virtue” to people who think this way.

    He can’t admit that Jews were harmful to Western culture because they represent “virtue, the Good”, as example of brute success, however obtained.

    So he’s in real quandary – on one level he loves western culture as an example of past success, but by the same token he must admire Jews who exemplify success now.

    To admit the two are in opposition would create too much mental strain and cognitive dissonance.

    In the same way he can’t admit that science undermined Wrstern morale even as it made it immensely powerful – severely limited by a mechanistic mind, he is blind to the richness of paradox, dialectic, and the reality of unintended consequences.

    And so it goes – I wouldn’t expect to honesty about Jews from him any time soon.

  254. @biz

    If any of you really want some truth, read this transcript of a speech given by a Jewish businessman at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., in 1961.

    The Truth will stand on its own merit

    A Jewish Defector Warns America:

    Benjamin Freedman Speaks

    by Benjamin H. Freedman

    Introductory Note — Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century.

    Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

    Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

    This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent than ever before…

    Read the whole thing here: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

    Watch this important speech in this You Tube video:

  255. Malla says:
    @Bischkva

    Hatred is almost exclusively exhibited by a group that perceives itself to be the inferior of another group.

    That is a big assumption and is not true. A lot of Europeans hate Gypsies because of crime but nobody in their right mind would claim that Europeans are inferior to Gypsies in general. People may hate others whom they perceive to be superior to themselves but it is mostly ‘different then themselves’ where the differences cause some form of affront to their way of life. More the affront, more the hatred.

    Jews are smarter than Europeans, who are smarter than Africans.

    Yet it is Jews who wish to live with Europeans and not the other way round. Outside Israel, Jews prefer to live in more Euro countries (U.S.A, Great Britain, Russia, France) while most Europeans have no wish to live in Israel.
    Something which has been a mystery to me is that if Europe has been so bad historically in Anti Semitism, why didn’t Jews just leave Europe and go to non White lands. A few did, like some Sephardic Jews who settled in the Ottoman Empire. But most still preferred to live in Europe.
    Besides, if Jews were to leave Europe/ North America/ Australia and the population demographics go back to say 1950 levels, will it bring a net loss in standard of living of the Europeans? That is the real question. That is because, when Europeans leave black countries, we definitely see a fall in the standard of living in those countries. Examples: Many but one that comes to mind is Zimbabwe. The way I see it, Jews as well as non Whites love to live with Europeans but still hate Europeans.

    Were the Palestinians’ adversaries been anyone BUT Jews, had they been Russian or Saudi or Egyptian, for all the shit they’ve pulled there wouldn’t be a single Palestianian alive today.

    Completely disagree.

  256. Malla says:
    @Bischkva

    Anti-semitism is the whites’ version of honkey-baiting by blacks.

    Not true at all. Indeed most Whites just want Jews out of their countries just like they want blacks out of their countries also. Besides the stereotypes of Jews tend to be that they are a cheating & untrustworthy people, a stereotype which is directed at blacks too. It is just that blacks are more violent and low IQ.

    • Replies: @Bischkva
    , @Bischkva
  257. Bischkva says:
    @Malla

    Most Whites want Jews out of their country? Where did that come from?

  258. Bischkva says:
    @Malla

    Read my post. Big difference between not wanting to live near someone, thinking someone is stupid (or even inferior), and playing the knockout game. Black on white crime is like 10x higher than white on black. BTW the negative feelings (hatred??) I see in these pages towards Jews confirms my point. To the next reader’s point: If Jews were cheaters, liars, etc. any worse than gentiles in business how do they stay in business? A reputation for cheating customers? The comments in this publication’s forums do not speak very well for the authors.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @lavoisier
  259. Malla says:
    @Bischkva

    If Jews were cheaters, liars, etc. any worse than gentiles in business how do they stay in business?

    Depends on what kind of Gentiles. If the gentiles are Asian Indians like me, then there is not much difference. We Indians have a horrible reputation of cheating, lying which in my opinion and experience is based on truth, yet we have Indians doing business throughout the world.

  260. Malla says:
    @DaveE

    However, it illustrates the stark contrast between the Muslim world and the catatonic, brain dead Christian world. At least the modern one.

    You gotta research the fake Scofield Bible for modern Christianity.

    BTW even Gandhi, “Mr. Passive Resistance” understood clearly the limitations of his Satayagra (however you spell it) strategy. He knew that once war broke out, “passive resistance” was tantamount to suicide.

    Gandhi and the Indian independence movement and nearly all anti colonial movements were frauds. It was already decided long time before Gandhi by secret societies based in London that the British Empire was to be dismantled as well as the other European Empires.

  261. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Bischkva

    This is ridiculous. Jews have been accused of many different things, some fairly, some unfairly.

    But to my knoweledge they have rarely been accused of unselfishness or a dedication to fair, transparent, and honest business dealings.

    Part of the reason they have been so successful in business has little to do with an inordinate focus on scruples.

    • Replies: @Bischkva
  262. Bischkva says:
    @lavoisier

    They say the same thing about Trump. He’s a crook, he stiffed his suppliers and workers.

    My father worked for Jews his entire professional life (clothing designer for 60 years). Between full time and freelance gigs, about 20 different people. His opinion: some were very nice, some were suspicious of gentiles (like us), some were workaholics, some were generous, some skinflints, most were very demanding, but none ever cheated him out of a dollar.

    I repeat: you can be all those things but crooks don’t stay in business for very long. The crooked jew is a convenient myth to cover up for jew-hatred. It’s the same rationale a certain Austrian corporal used to great effect and reverberates to this day. And it’s really stupid.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  263. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Bischkva

    Stereotypes are not created out of a vaccuum.

    Noticing those stereotypes, and the repeated confirmation that those stereotypes are a reflection of reality, does not make one Hitler. It simply makes one observant.

    Stop the bullshit and the deception.

    Wall Street Bank government payoffs, the Mortgage Meltdowns, mortgage backed securities, the Madoff scandal, the Milliken scandals, the hedge fund scams–scandal after scandal after scandal has the Jewish imprint all over it.

    How come 99% of the world class financial scandals in the United States have Jewish fingerprints all over the scandals? Anti-Semitism???

    Give me one major financial swindle in the last 20 years not perpetrated by the Jews and I might think you have something to say besides nonsense.

    Where there is smoke there is fire. In this case there is not only smoke, there is a towering inferno.

    My question: Why such comfort with rank dishonesty and financial swindling of others among the Tribe?

  264. Bischkva says:

    Jews are over-represented in banking. It’s in their DNA. Of course any large-scale banking scandal will involve Jews. Of the big crooks from 2007 who were not Jews, off the top of my head the CEO of Countrywide, head of Fannie, head of Freddy Mac. According to Forbes 11% of the world’s billionaires are of the hebraic persuasion.

    Your comments about stereotypes are interesting. I partly agree with you but there are all sorts of gradations of stereotypes. Consider this sequence: Jews are smart/work hard, Jews are rich, Jews are wealthy beyond their demographic numbers, Jews are rich because of aggressive business practices, some Jews are crooks, all jews are crooks, and finally Jews eat christian babies.

    My stereotype ends with “some jews are crooks.” Yours probably with “all jews are crooks.” Some folks reading this probably believe that Jews have regularly eaten Christian babies.

    All are stereotypes. Are all based on truth? Is it possible to stretch the actual truth into a silly stereotype?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.