The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Harvey Sweinstein and Hollywood's Hos
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_733762231

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I’d like to better understand the conservative media’s orgy over Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced and disgraceful Hollywood film producer and studio executive who used his power over decades to have his way with starlets.

To listen to conservative talkers, the women affronted or assaulted by Weinstein were all Shakespearean talent in the making—female clones of Richard Burton (he had no match among women)—who made the pilgrimage to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Hollywood Hills, for the purpose of realizing their talent, never knowing it was a meat market. Watching the women who make up the dual-perspective panels “discussing” the Weinstein saga, it’s hard to tell conservative from liberal.

“Conservative” women now complain as bitterly as their liberal counterparts about “objectification.”

However, the female form has always been revered; been the object of sexual longing, clothed and nude. The reason the female figure is so crudely objectified nowadays has a great deal to do with … women themselves. By virtue of their conduct, women no longer inspire reverence as the fairer sex, and as epitomes of loveliness. For they are crasser, vainer, more eager to expose all voluntarily than any male. Except for Anthony Weiner, the name of an engorged organism indigenous to D.C., who was is in the habit of exposing himself as often as the Kardashians do.

The latter clan is a bevy of catty exhibitionists, controlled by a mercenary, ball-busting matriarch called Kris Kardashian. Kris is madam to America’s First Family of Celebrity Pornographers. (To launch a career with a highly stylized, self-directed sex tape is no longer even condemned.) Lots of little girls, with parental approval, look up to the Kardashians.

From Kim, distaff America learns to couch a preoccupation with pornographic selfies in the therapeutic idiom. Kardashian flaunts her ass elephantiasis with pure self-love. Yet millions of her admirers depict her obscene posturing online as an attempt to come to terms with her body. “Be a little easier on myself,” counsels Kim as she directs her camera to the nether reaches of her carefully posed, deformed derriere. While acting dirty and self-adoring, Kardashian delivers as close to a social jeremiad on self-esteem as her kind can muster. Genius!

Liberalism and libertinism are intertwined. The more liberal a woman, the more libertine she’ll be—and the more she’ll liberate herself to be coarse, immodest, vulgar and plain repulsive. Think of the menopausal Ashley Judd rapping lewdly about her (alleged) menstrual fluids at an anti-Trump rally. Think of all those liberal, liberated grannies adorning pussy dunce-caps on the same occasion.

By nature, the human woman is a peacock. We like to be noticed. The conservative among us prefer the allure of modesty. The sluts among us don’t. On social media, women outstrip men in the narcissistic and exhibitionist departments. In TV ads, American women, fat, thin, young and old, are grinding their bottoms, spreading their legs, showing the contours of their crotches, and dancing as though possessed (or like primates on heat), abandoning any semblance of femininity and gentility, all the while laughing like hyenas and hollering hokum like, “I Own It.”

The phrase a “bum’s rush” means “throw the bum out!” When it comes to Allison Williams, daughter of NBC icon Brian Williams, a bum’s rush takes on new meaning. Thanks in no small measure to her famous father, the young woman has become a sitcom star. And Ms. Williams has worked extra-hard to hone all aspects of an actress’s instrument (the body). Alison has carried forth enthusiastically about a groundbreaking scene dedicated to exploring “ass motorboating” or “booty-eating,” on HBO’s “Girls.”

The lewder, more pornographic, and less talented at their craft popular icons become—the louder the Left lauds their artistically dodgy output. (The “Right” just keeps moving Left.) “Singer” Miley Cyrus was mocked before she began twerking tush, thrusting pelvis and twirling tongue. Only then had she arrived as an artist, in the eyes of “critics” on the Left. The power of the average pop artist and her products, Miley’s included, lies in the pornography that is her “art,” in her hackneyed political posturing, and in the fantastic technology that is Auto-Tune (without which all the sound you’d hear these “singers” emit would be a bedroom whisper).

Liberal women, the majority, go about seriously and studiously cultivating their degeneracy. If “Raising Skirts to Celebrate the Diversity of Vaginas” sounds foul, wait for the accompanying images. These show feral creatures (women, presumably), skirts hoisted, gobs agape, some squatting like farmhands in an outhouse, all yelling about their orifices.

Do you know of a comparable man’s movement? If anything, men are punished when they react normally to women behaving badly.

Female soldiers got naked and uploaded explicit images of themselves to an online portal. The normals male soldiers shared the images and were promptly punished for so doing. And the conservative side of that ubiquitous, dueling-perspectives political panel approved of the punishment meted to the men.

So endemic is distaff degeneracy these days that “protesters” routinely disrobe or perform lewd acts with objects in public. Vladimir Putin is a great man if only for arresting a demented band of performance artists, Pussy Riot, for desecrating a Russian church.

If men flashed for freedom; they’d be arrested, jailed and placed on the National Sex Offender Registry.

Talk about the empress being in the buff, I almost forgot to attach an image of this celebrity, bare-bottomed on the red-carpet. Rose McGowan is hardly unique. Many a star will arrive at these events barely clothed. (Here are 38 more near-naked Red-Carpet appearances.)

Expect a feminist lecture about a woman’s right to pretend her bare bottom is haute couture, rather than ho couture, and expecting the Harveys of the world to behave like choir boys around her. Fine.

ORDER IT NOW

Being British, BBC News anchors are not nearly as dour about the Harvey hysteria as the American anchors. A female presenter began a Sweinstein segment by saying men claim the coverage of the scandal is excessive; women say the opposite. “That’s why we’re covering it,” quipped her witty male sidekick. She roared with laughter. That’s my girl!

Look, Harvey is a lowlife. But Hollywood hos are not as the sanctimonious Sean Hannity portrays them: “naive, innocent young things,” dreams shattered.

Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly paleolibertarian column since 1999, and is the author of The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed (June, 2016) & Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011). Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/IlanaMercer .

 
Hide 312 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. whorefinder says: • Website

    Agreed; most of those women are feigning shock at what happened. They’re piling on now to prevent being called out as the prostitutes they are.

  2. TheJester says:

    Thank you, Ilana, for pointing out the hypocrisy of women behaving like sluts who object to men reacting to them signaling the world that they are sluts. Is the real issue that actresses in Hollywood will only take off their clothes for hard cash … and Harvey was not offering hard cash but only nebulous hints at future roles in his productions? This is important when surveying the careers of many of the actresses jumping on the bandwagon to destroy Harvey Weinstein. We know they have and will take off their clothes for the right price.

    This is captured in the story of a man offering a woman a million dollars to go to bed with him. She agrees. Then, he changes the offer to one dollar. The woman objects! “What do you think I am … a prostitute.” The man answers, “We know what you are. We’re negotiating the price.”

    Feminism promises women empowerment. However, there is a pornographic side to the promise. There are legions of women trying to give the world a hard-on for attention, money, status, etc. When the world reacts, as in the story, they say, “Don’t touch me … what do you think I am?”

    So, it’s about power and control, something dear to the hearts of feminists. “You can want me but you can’t have me … (until you meet my price).” Men have a word for these women. We call them “prick teasers”. It is a dispute over price, and it makes men very, very angry to react to the signals and then be ridiculed for reacting to the signals.

    • Replies: @SMK
  3. Rurik says:

    who used his power over decades to have his way with starlets.

    shiksas

    ;)

    https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=shiksas&form=HDRSC2&first=1&cw=1263&ch=907

    • Replies: @JGarbo
  4. Kirt says:

    Your best column ever, Ilana! An instant Unz Review classic.

    • Replies: @macilrae
  5. utu says:

    Chief deputy US Marshal ‘had sex with multiple women in his office in exchange for prime parking spots outside his office’

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4986958/Chief-deputy-Marshal-offered-parking-spots-sex.html#ixzz4w1TgYMes

    If they do it for parking spots should anybody be surprised they do it for a movie career?

    • LOL: Alden
  6. Thomm says:

    Cuckservatives are hardcore woman-worshipping feminists first and foremost.

    They will put aside any other objective when the prospect of groveling to women presents itself.

  7. Dave Pinsen says: • Website

    Ilana,

    Miley Cyrus may have been an exhibitionist earlier in her career, but no scare quotes belong around “singer” when describing her. She can sing. See below.

    • Replies: @JGarbo
  8. As is Weinstein isn’t bad enough, people like him are forging an alliance with People of Dot to really destroy America.

  9. Must as I hate a lot of liberal ideology, I would disagree with the argument that left-liberal woman are more libertine than mainstream conservative women. Social class, personality and intelligence have a much bigger bearing on female (and male) sexual behaviour than political ideology. And there is no evidence than liberal women tend to be more sexually explicit in their appearance than non-liberal women. The make up is thicker, the women are louder, and the skirts are shorter on Fox News rather than CNN.

    Liberal women like Ashley Judd making vulgar comments to annoy religious conservatives doesn’t really count. Playing up for the camera isn’t necessarily an indication of real life behaviour.

  10. Dan Hayes says:

    Ilana,

    Thank you for saying what you said about more equitably apportioning the blame among males and females. Fortunately or unfortunately only a woman such as you can say such things in our PC world. In our unfair world this is the best that is possible and for this you deserve our thanks.

  11. Wally says: • Website

    Clueless ‘feminists’ ignore Muslim treatment of women while they protest for women’s dignity, yet they say that Miley Cyrus is advancing women’s dignity.

    Women are legally stoned in Muslim countries and gays & lesbians are legally executed for being gay / lesbian in Muslim countries. And HILLARY took millions in ‘donations’ from those countries.

    The Clearest Problem With Modern Feminism
    Muslim Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), where are the ‘feminists’?

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/16/why-are-feminists-silent-after-revelations-of-female-genital-mutilation-in-the-us/

    Something is deeply wrong when people show solidarity with Muslims who believe that women should be forced have their clitorises cut off.

    Not Republican, but Muslim

  12. Seraphim says:

    In the grand times of Hollywood, before the War, an open secret was that all aspiring starlets had to pass through the couch of a personage known by the nickname of Ben Cinema or Kalkeinstein, (described as “horrible and more! ugly, old and dirty, lumbering and stupid, a real piece of garbage, in his person and in his surroundings…a real vomiting forth from the ghetto”).
    History repeats itself…

  13. I get an impression Ms Mercer is showing some solidarity with her co-ethnic, Harvey Weinstein.

    • LOL: iffen
  14. The funniest thing?
    How MScuM pretends I’m not doung this.

  15. Malla says:

    This is the result of decades of Cultural Marxism, MK Ultra mind control programming, Monarch programming of our celebrities, Predictive Programming, Trauma based programming, modern art, the CIA distributing drugs to American youths during the hippy revolution etc…. All of the above to destroy traditional Western civilisation and perhaps all the traditional cultures in the world. All done by the elites via the education system, media, Hollywood etc… The West and perhaps the entire world is ruled by Globalist Oligarchs/Bankers who care not about the people of the West or those in other parts of the world. Nearly a century of this and you get a crappy society. I mean just compare Victorian England (which I agree was not perfect) to today’s society. What a fall. What a massive fall.
    BTW people who do not know anything about the above terms like predictive programming or monarch programming, need to do some research. Why do you think TV shows are called TV ‘programs’ as in programming audience? And Hollywood has always been a major part of that brain washing of the masses, so I am not surprised about the whole Sweinstein fiasco.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @druid
    , @DaveE
  16. Well… I think there’s a causality issue here. Weinstein & co pick on them when they’re mostly very young; they become degenerate later. There is an element of truth, but the really obscene behaviour is a feature of established veterans.

  17. “To listen to conservative talkers….”

    There’s your problem. Reminds me of an old joke:

    Patient: Doctor, it hurts my head when I bang it against the wall!

    Doctor: Have you tried not banging your head against the wall?

  18. So far you are the first to point this.

  19. macilrae says:
    @Kirt

    You are, of course, absolutely spot-on – including about Harvey who is the Jewish equivalent of the Ugly American; reinforcing the worst stereotype to perfection.

    Reminds my of those women who go about with their (excuse me) tits hanging out and then say “It’s disgusting the way all these men keep staring at my cleavage!”

  20. Great article. Also funny: “ho couture” …well, I liked it.
    Couple points:
    Worth remembering that often Weinstein selected women with NO power/influence; ie those way beneath Kardashians etc. This is not to contest Illana’s points about female celebrities exploiting their sexuality, merely to note that Weinstein really was a slithering predator.
    Also worth noting that, although dreckification of female (actually, all) sexuality goes beyond simple commerce, there has been a rough parallel between unleashed Capitalism (neoliberalism) & unleashed sexuality. Of course, it’s “old hat” that “sex sells” … however, now increasing degrees of pornography are accepted, indeed celebrated as “liberated”, artistic etc.
    Illana is completly correct when she refers to the rank hypocracy re: male female sexuality. definitely “not equal” (unless male sexuality is considered under the heading of “gay” etc)

  21. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    How can Hollywood proclaim to always be for women and their rights, shouting they are at the front of protecting women when the movie factories in that town have portrayed many a lead actress as a prostitute?
    This isn’t something recent, women as prostitutes in films goes back decades.

    How can degrading women by showing them as money-craving whores be in any way defending women?

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
    , @Alden
  22. Renoman says:

    For thousands of years the terms Prostitute and Actress were interchangeable. Sure Harve is a douche bag but he’s far from the only one. They knew what they were in for and were duly compensated.

  23. Magnificent! Before it’s all over the idiot feminists in the MSM will turn every non-metro-sexual male into Harvey.

  24. wow says:

    I am 1000X more attractive and in far better shape that Harvey Fatstein. Yet he has tapped far better poon than I can ever hope to tap. That any women on earth would bang such a hideous creature is very discouraging to the average guy out there. Fatstein is a gross pig, but the women that opened themselves to his smelly diseased penis should kill themselves for all women.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    , @njguy73
  25. @whorefinder

    Whats happened can be reduced to “the niggerfication of america”

    • Replies: @edNels
    , @Truth
  26. @Wally

    Feminists say nothing for several reasons:

    1) They fear them;
    2) They feel a kindred sense of being oppressed by evil WEMs;
    3) They secretly want to be dominated and treated like a lady should be treated once all the wussified WEMs are finally taken care of.

  27. @wow

    Remind me to photoshop Harvey’s and Ashley’s heads onto a photo of Jabba the Hut and Princess Leia.

  28. DFH says:

    Ilana blaming the shiksas, what a surprise!

    • Replies: @Evocatus
    , @Anon
  29. Lara says:

    It’s not that hard to deflect unwanted male attention or to downplay your looks. When I hear a woman complain of sexual harassment, I suspect she is most likely a trouble maker and desperate for attention. There are likely exceptions, but this tends to be my first reaction. It’s rarely the prettiest women who complain of sexual harassment.
    I know plenty of liberal women who are not crude nor overtly sexual. I guess they just ignore that facet of the left.

    • Replies: @Thomm
    , @Alden
  30. Ben10 says:

    Weinstein has always defended and represented the Western Values….

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  31. Z-man says:

    Vladimir Putin is a great man if only for arresting a demented band of performance artists, Pussy Riot, for desecrating a Russian church.

    Bears repeating.
    Putin Da!!
    Trump-Putin 2017-25!!!

  32. imbroglio says:

    When I was in grad school, there were some women grad students who exchanged sexual favors for the possibility of career advancement. Sometimes the women initiated the swap. Sometimes the more well-connected male (or female) faculty member or administrator initiated the swap. Some women (and possibly men) who were propositioned declined.

    Query: If you said yes and got your payoff and if those who said no didn’t get an equivalent payoff and if, by virtue of the payoff, you succeeded while those who declined the exchange didn’t succeed, do you owe them anything? Morally.

    Many who are posting #metoo on social media seem to feel that their membership in the victim class entitles them to receive benefits in exchange for sexual favors and then to recover, in attitudes of righteousness, the consideration they paid for those benefits: shaming, intimidating and threatening, under potential penalty of false or ambiguoous accusation, those who might seek to call them on their hypocrisy.

    And let’s not turn a blind eye to the feminized male enablers who seek women’s approval by lauding this instance of having one’s cake and eating it too.

    Lest I be susceptible to laches (the legal term for clean hands that do the dirty work,) I was never tempted and, perhaps for that reason, recall the lady who died and sought admission to the pearly gates.

    “May I have some evidence of your virtue,” Saint Peter said as he riffled through her dossier.
    “Indeed. I never succumbed to temptation,” the lady proudly asserted.
    “But were you ever tempted?”
    “No,” she said, fearing to lie to Saint Peter.
    “Well, madam, if you’ve never been tempted, you get no credit for not having succumbed to it.”

  33. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Excellent article, Ms. Mercer. And thanks for the puncture holes delivered to Conservative Inc. (Hannity etal).

    As to the, er, “ladies” who prowl about Hollywood and are now crying wolf, “what goes around comes around.”

  34. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    What’s the big difference between Weinstein and former president Bill Clinton except that one was the frickin president of the US? Clinton used his various positions throughout the years to intimidate women, from the days of using Arkansas state troopers to act as procurers for him to later using federal agencies to harass them into shutting up. His wife Hillary, the almost-president, ran interference for him in muzzling the various women who might have spilled the beans. The Clintons postured themselves as champions of women’s rights even as the reality of this sleazy couple was really tawdry. Weinstein was just a studio boss with money and film roles to dispense to a never-ending line of wannabe actresses. He fits right in with the Clintons as part of the Hollywood celebrity and glitz crowd and Hillary would never have called him a “deplorable”. Yet even now there’s many people who are Clinton fans and supporters even as they hypocritically play this game of ‘get the fat guy’. The Clintons are a hundred times worse.

  35. This is how feminine looks like. Note the class, the behavior and the voice of course. :

  36. Neuday says:
    @Priss Factor

    I work with this guy, and he’s a pretty good and hardworking Sr. Java Developer. Hard to understand, though.

  37. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    You do not need philosophy to explain a love for money. Whether the profiteering Kardashians or the profiteering Madonna (and a legion of her imitators), these women did the indecent, lewd, into-your-face pornographic performances for financial gains. They have been denigrating themselves (and other women, by association) for money. They wanted the money. By any means.
    That the US government has extolled the deeply amoral Pussy Riot scum tells a lot about the moral crisis in the US, including the unending and very expensive wars of aggression run by the country that has no money for a single-payer medical system.
    The pink pussies that demonstrated against Donald and for Hilary, used to be offended when reminded about Libyan tragedy (“we came, we saw, he died, ha, ha, ha…”) and about the hundreds of thousands of human beings (including thousands and thousands children) slaughtered there on the Obama/Clinton watch. Did we have the pink pussies demonstrating against Obama’s seven wars? – No. The pink pussies needed some brainwashing before suddenly going into a public activism phase with silly hats on their empty heads. Are pussy hats demonstrating against the impending wars of the US with Iran and Korea? – No. Nobody gave an order for and provided money for organizing the parades. These “progressive” female activists are ridiculous.

    By the way, is Dershowitz cleared re his visits to Lolita Island where real underage victims were held for the pleasure of powerful sex predators?

    • Replies: @John_Poot
  38. Malla says:
    @Wally

    This is because Feminism is an arm of Cultural Marxism which primarily wants nothing but the destruction of Western Civilisation and Western peoples.

    Islam according to them are allies in this process.

    • Replies: @Anon-og
  39. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Ms Mercer makes some valid points, but this screed isn’t much different from another Tribe member, fashionista Donna Karan who said the women who had been raped/molested ‘were asking for it,’ for the way they dressed.

    I don’t think anybody asks to get raped, but when it comes to our Jewish Overlords, the wagons must be circled to protect the guilty and slut-shame the victims.

  40. I love reading Ilana Mercer’s politically incorrect take on events and her brilliant use of language.. Seeing how far US society has descended since I was growing up in the 1960′s, I’m glad to be a married, monogamous senior citizen. We certainly had our problems then, with the Vietnam War at the top of the list, but at least the women were not covered in disgusting tattoos and man-hating feminism was still in its infancy.

    • Agree: renfro
  41. c matt says:

    I still don’t get all the fuss about this. The wannabe starlets knew the price of fame and fortune (or if not, found out quickly), and were willing to pay it. It is just straight up prostitution. Seems to me the only ones with a claim are the ones who paid the price and didn’t get the part.

  42. @Sergey Krieger

    Sergey, you posted here an example of femininity of Senchina–a value long destroyed by feminism in the West–as opposed to sexuality, which is the fad. It is the same as comparing real love and real intimacy to raw sex, or porn. For former one needs a real woman, for the latter a slut will suffice.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
  43. gwynedd1 says:

    The scandal, as I have portrayed it, was the leftist hypocrisy in their political attacks against Trump. All Trump did was describe a woman’s nature around powerful men. They volunteer themselves. Weinstein was far more coercive and they said nothing all these years. Women were victimized by this , but not the ones we know. It was the women who didn’t advance their careers by any means who were victims. Perhaps that is one reason why women do not draw so much at the box office. We do not get to enjoy the talent that got them there.

    • Agree: Vinteuil
  44. Rurik says:

    Yes, the culture today is far, far more crass and degenerate than say, in the 50s, when Leave it to Beaver played on America’s TVs, and Norman Rockwell and all that.

    But what has happened to our culture?

    Has the race into the sewer been a consequence of loose women of America (England, etc..) driving the decline?

    Or, are the causes a more a top down affair? IOW resulting from the big-money producers and all those men who run Hollywood?

    women, as indeed many men, are given to fashions and peer pressure. If the prevailing culture is one of modesty and self-respect, the women’s behavior will reflect that. The American women of the 1950s were of more or less the same stock of women as the gutter skanks Ilana rightfully laments today, but did women drive this downward trend, or did (a few) men?

    One thing that has been noticed, are the striking similarities between American culture today and that of Weimar, Germany. Weimar was notoriously corrupt, with sexual degeneracy and prostitution rampant. Berlin was described as a giant brothel, where the desperate German youth were exploited and debased.

    Perhaps it was the fault of those young Germans who, while likely starving from the wrath and rapine of the allies, (who deliberately looted the German economy dry). Or perhaps it was more the fault of the wealthy and powerful non-German men, who preyed on these young, often desperate women (and girls and boys). But the parallels are unmistakable.

    which is why people are posting propaganda cartoons from back then, because the images are eerily familiar to what seems to be going on today, no?

    https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-01c658fd480082cc2e02392133d69190-c?convert_to_webp=true


    how can you not think of Harvey Weinstein when you see those cartoons?

    Perhaps Ilana is right, and the blame starts and ends with the women. But then I think of all those Mickey Mouse Club girls who turned into skanks,

    [I won't post the pictures, but you can find them..]

    and I notice that they were raised in Hollywood, like Miley Cyrus, who seemed to be groomed specifically as an all American type of innocent Hanna Montana… who then morphs straight into the gutter skank we all wince at- for all those preteen American girls to emulate. Just like Madonna was a generation before.

    I confess it seems to me that the skankification of America’s young women is part of a deliberate agenda coming straight out of Hollywood. No?

  45. Mark Presco says: • Website

    Women have been sexually exploiting Men for a living for 5 million years. Women’s price for sex has always been that men provision them. There is nothing wrong with this. It helped shaped both human physical and cultural evolution and we might have gone extinct without it.

    The thing that interests me is, why now. The casting couch has been a stereotype all of my life. Why the piling on at this time?

    • Replies: @Rurik
  46. @c matt

    I still don’t get all the fuss about this.

    The fuss is about glamour Hollywood whores trying to teach others non-stop what is good and right. Obviously they do all this form the supposition that prostitution is good and liberating. You know, lowest common denominator? Most of them are also dumb as fvcks and this goes not only to wo..sluts there, to the so called men too. Look at Clooneys and other Damons of that cabal. They should concentrate on doing what they allegedly do best–pretend to be other people. Most of them have no serious analytical skills to start with. Hey, at least Brad Pitt is in this just for fvcking chicks at the height of their hotness–at least it is honest.

    • Replies: @Alden
  47. Joe Hide says:

    I first began to totally ignore the MSM’s comments on Putin when he had the degeneracy of the “Pussy Riot” in a Russian Church forcefully stopped. It was great to see the Cossacks beat the beejebans out of those morally offensive hooligans trying to illegally impose George Soro’s world view on others.

  48. Every woman could have said No to Mr. “Sweinstein”. Bros before hos are the name of the game not only in Hollywood. The hypocrites should not lament. It takes two to tango!

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  49. Wally says: • Website
    @Rurik

    “I confess it seems to me that the skankification of America’s young women is part of a deliberate agenda coming straight out of Hollywood. No?”

    Here you go.
    From: ‘The Spirit Of Militarism’, by Nahum Goldmann
    Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress:

    “The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.”

    • Replies: @Another Realist
  50. damn, the hate for female hollywood stars is oozing off the pages :)

    why? kakekekakka

  51. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Haha! Islamophobic sore losers!

    Impotent at attacking Islam’s core values of True Monotheism, and in the context of this essay, Modesty and Sexual Fidelity through marriage alone, the likes of you desperately resort to feeble attacks, such as FGM. :D

    Only problem for you vile people is that FGM has no sanction in Islam!! It is simply some nomadic tribal ritual, mainly in North Africa.

    http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/prevalence/en/

    Now, how about the Ho culture in all of western civilisation? It has become your lifeblood, for both females and males. When you lowlifes talk about preserving your way of life, one of those ways is, Ho culture. *spit*

    It is pathetic watching you spiritual losers blame everything on Hollywood Hos (male or female), when most of you morally deficient lowlifes would love to be in their shoes.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Alden
    , @Avery
  52. Rurik says:
    @Mark Presco

    The casting couch has been a stereotype all of my life. Why the piling on at this time?

    perhaps because of The Trumpening

    perhaps now that Trump is in DC, there are forces at work that have bristled under the excruciatingly dishonest levels of hypocrisy coming out of the leftisphere.

    accusing Trump of being disrespectful to women, as they rape women and girls wholesale, and the entire leftist power structure always looks the other way, so long as the rapist is a leftist himself, and will use his power for the leftist agenda.

    so these serial predators like Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein all get a pass from the feminists and liberal, progressives, so long as they assist with The Agenda to destroy Western Civilization, (and the people who created it ; ).
    As long as Bill Clinton hails the day when whites will be a minority in this country, (to the cheers of liberal college students), he can rape women all day long. He can sexually harass, as the most powerful man in the world, powerless girls in the White House, and all to a thunderous silence from the entire leftist, progressive (hypocritical / hatred-consumed) power structure. Because he works towards their agenda. [the same agenda, BTW - that destroyed S. Africa and Rhodesia]

    But for a man like Trump, who seems to have raised daughters who respect themselves, and seem to conduct themselves with a certain dignity- that isn’t what’s important. What’s important is what is always important…

    THE AGENDA

    the relentless, drum-beating agenda to destroy Western values. To eviscerate the culture of 1950s America (with virtues like honor and temperance) once and for all, and replace it with a septic tank value system, where self-respect is replaced with self-loathing. Where dignity and femininity is replace with twerking with your tongue out. Where Hollywood starlets howl about how “nasty” they are, as if being a skank is a moral badge of feminine honor.

    That’s what’s going on here. We’re in the trenches of the cold culture war, turned hot culture war.

    They wanted to destroy Trump and the deplorables with shrieking about how Trump was disrespectful to women. But now the cover of the giant septic tank known as Hollywood has been lifted off, for all the world to gasp at the slithering creatures and whiff the terrible stench.

    I wonder if it’s a kind of payback time for Hillary and her army of morally preening orcs, feasting on the flesh of young women, and smacking their liver lips with anticipation of the next young shiksa to walk though that hotel room door.

    I only hope we get an investigation into Pizzagate next, with perhaps a nice expose’ of Jeffrey Epstein’s Child Rape Island, and all those liberal, progressive morally preening men who take so many trips there.

    this might just be all a sign of the great Trumpening

  53. joe webb says:

    From Ed Connelly’s piece at The Occidental Observer now …on Jewish revenge on shiksas, etc.

    “Let me cut right to the chase: The title for this essay should really be “The Specifically Jewy Perviness of Harvey Weinstein,” which, as luck would have it, is in fact the title of a short entry by Jewish writer Max Oppenheimer in the very Jewish magazine Tablet. This Jewish writer opines that “Harvey, sadly, is a deeply Jewish kind of pervert.”

    Okay, I’m good with that. It fits the facts.

    What is this “perversion”? Well, Herr Oppenheimer kindly explains how it is common for Jewish men to lust after women with a “non-Jewish origin,” or, to be more specific, White non-Jewish women [ to be even more precise, blondes ] every one of these women — Rose McGowan, Ambra Batillana, Laura Madden, Ashley Judd, etc. — was a Gentile, all the better to feed Weinstein’s revenge-tinged fantasy . . .””

    The central notion here is that beautiful blonde goyim gals entice good jewish boys and threaten to remove them from The Tribe. Thus, the revenge idea.

    Philip Roth, the novelist, is Exhibit A. There are no other exhibits. Connelly is a movie buff, not a social scientist except for his generally anti-semitic attitude (which is ok with me of course).

    However, that was then, Roth and all the psychoanalytic mumbo-jumbo hustled to the goyim from freudo-snake-oil peddlers.. … Now is perhaps a different time. Yes, disappointing Mother by leaving the Tribe for The Blonde could be yogied into a psychoanalytic position, but more convincingly at a common sense goyim level, it is just a cigar. Disappoint your Mother? Blame your shiksa girl-friend? Why not?

    Let me suggest a post-psychoanalysis and post-mo and post po-mo explanation: Jewish girls are mostly ugly. I have seen the jewish males operate…they ARE more sex-obsessed than we white males. (As for ‘monkeys’ my experience with several jewish girlfriends compared to our ladies…the jewish gals are far more simian than our gals. Ok with me )

    Without necessarily rejecting the revenge thesis, it is probable that in a time now where it is claimed that half of jewish marriages are Out ( usually not discussed is the first marriage which spawns children amongst any race or group), that sheer beauty is the primary motivation of jews, like white guys and other putative males.

    I doubt that a semi-psychopath like Weinstein gives a shit about his Mother. He just wants to get laid real bad, like the other semites, Arabs. I recall a news item a couple months ago. An Arab (?) illegal immigrant in Europe was arrested for raping a boy. His defense was that he was “having a sexual emergency.”

    I have said before that Semites were largely pastoralists, not agriculturists. Animals, not plants. Plants don’t hump one-another. This is one possible bio-cultural feedback dynamic that might explain semitic sex hyper-drive. Look at Arabs draping their women in tents…all to cover up all skin. and not provoke…and chaperones…for the ladies, who are probably as randy as the males. Hence, removal of clit, etc. just to bridle the beast.

    the Arab’s IQ around 85 average, and other factors being equal maybe, are thus less constrained than “neurotic jewish boys.”

    I see that Ann Coulter just dissed the “ugly” girl scribblers for revenge against the beautiful “hos” that Weinstein, et al, chase. There is some revenge there for sure. Catty wymyn and all that.

    Meanwhile, beautiful golden-haired gals are the envied of all the darkies, not just Jews. White men as privileged with access to our beauties are also hated. Why not? Like Eldridge Cleaver (the black panther rapist of yesteryear )and his book..revenge on whites for a million years of slavery. And do not forget the counter-argument…a million years of life in Africa with no ice to smarten them up.

    Aryan Beauty just is. However, I prefer brunettes.

    Joe Webb

    • Replies: @Malla
  54. unit472 says:

    Let’s be fair here. Women strut their ‘stuff’ same as men but in a different way. A man will buy a very expensive car or some other display of wealth or power to attract a female and females respond to these displays by highlighting their sexual desirability and availability. We are animals seeking mates after all and males have to demonstrate their dominance in nature before the female will mate with the male. Thus a Harvey Weinstein could no more have sex with an Ashley Judd than a derelict laying on the sidewalk absent some display of power and wealth that interested Judd.

    The other side of this coin is that a woman cannot compel a man to have sex with her no matter how much money or power she has. Men do not sexually respond to a physically repulsive female and he cannot ‘fake’ an orgasm. This is why I do not believe in criminally prosecuting, e.g., a female school teacher for having sex with a 16 year old student. Fire her for improper conduct but jail her? Come on the boy was willing if he had sex with her!

  55. mp says:

    It’s like the old joke:
    Will you have sex with me for a million dollars?
    OK.
    What about one dollar?
    What kind of girl do you think I am?
    We’ve already established what kind of girl you are. We’re just negotiating.

  56. Wally says: • Website
    @anonymous

    Oh yawn.

    As usual, you’re babbling on with childish strawmen.

    But then that’s what unhinged redneck Zionists do. That’s all they do.

    Muslims Throws Iraqi Homosexual from Rooftop
    http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/04/01/graphic-photos-islamic-state-throws-iraqi-man-accused-homosexuality-rooftop/
    And here’s another one of your boys at work:
    Nationally known Jewish children’s singer, songwriter arrested by FBI for child pornography
    http://us.blastingnews.com/news/2017/09/nationally-known-jewish-childrens-singer-songwriter-arrested-on-child-pornogra-002024197.htmlEric Komar

    Information is freedom:

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
    , @Father O'Hara
    , @Alden
  57. edNels says:
    @Colleen Pater

    Correct! done with the help of supporting Diversity of this that and the other!

    Diversity enables, coaxes a liberal view of all the things that previously were off limits, because in the past populations held those things and behaviors as disgusting and bad including maybe even whole notorious offending races and creeds, and foreigners etc. who were routinely in past reduced to stereotypes, and that’s not all bad BTW.

    Stereotyping is a tool in Generalization, which is a way to cope with the… gaddamned everlovin’ hodge podge encroachment of unwanted f’n Diversity.

    And all their ‘kissing’ cousins of made up Identity subgroups being pushed on the Western world.

    Purpose: Chaos. Who benefits? Cui Bono? Ask GA who otter know about it.

    I mean it took me decades to use the P word, and I heard it lots. look at degradation of language for a start.

  58. Excellent piece, showcasing your good sense as always. I yield to no man in my hyper enthusiasm for the undraped female form but to cynically “launch a career with a highly stylized, self-directed sex tape” incites my scorn, not lust. I have been fed up for years when perusing the morning headlines seeing articles about the latest, most egregious examples of Hollyweird bimbos showing up at events more or less naked. I’ve long since ceased looking or caring; they just annoy me. Putting all one’s assets on constant public display destroys the allure and mystery that is woman and does not empower them, it makes them the “pieces of meat” that they’ve been screaming about for close on a century, especially for the last 50 odd years. Women have made quite the cottage industry of whining that guys don’t understand them, “don’t get it” but refuse to acknowledge the obverse. By tripping the lights fantastic with their fun bits exposed they appear to the primal great white shark which is the male sex drive as easily gotten chum; and like the Assyrian of old, we fall upon and devour them, in a manner of speaking. A rather old adage said “If it ain’t for sale, don’t advertise it”. As for Harvey, the fascination of the hogs at the slop trough is that the revolting pig~man didn’t just want to have sex with these women, but to have them observe his disgusting degeneracy. The Cities of the Pains had nothing on us.

  59. druid says:
    @Wally

    Get a life, Wally!

    • Replies: @Wally
  60. druid says:
    @Jon Halpenny

    That’s the impression I got. Doing it by stealth!

  61. druid says:
    @Malla

    This is the result of the Jews in Hollywood who have been pushing the envelope for decades with referene to this kind of behavior. They also control the porn industry for the most part. So, big surprise, with guys like Sweinstein!

    • Replies: @Anon
  62. Anon-og says:
    @Wally

    Outside of the temporary control of Afghanistan by the Taliban, what other Muslim countries are “stoning” women? Mutilating clits is an African custom not a Muslim one, research before you talk out of your ass Wally. Stoning as punishment goes back to the Bible, and is a old Christian custom, the Bible talks plenty about it. Illana is slick and this is a sophisticated defense of Jewish perversion.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Anon
    , @Wally
  63. Anon-og says:
    @Malla

    The left simply trying to neuter Islam as it has Christianity, not gonna work though.

    • Replies: @Malla
  64. I am nearly 60 years old. And jokes and stories about “hollywood casting couches” and how pretty young women got roles in productions have been around longer than I have.

    To me, this whole story is just filed under more “fake news”. No, I don’t doubt the stories. I don’t doubt that harvey was not a good man. But, its all basically propaganda. Harvey supported a political opponent of the people now attacking him 24.7 all over the right-wing media, so now these stories that are older than I am are suddenly headline news and the big lead on right-wing sites all over the internet.

    These stories have even bumped the stories about which NFL players should be lined up in front of a firing squad and shot for not maintain the proper posture during the sacred National Anthem here in the Land of the Free.

    So, to me, this just more Fake News. Its propaganda and political attack using weaponized ‘news’. And I don’t care. If I had a daughter going to Hollywood, I’d give her the same warnings about scum-bags in the movie business and the casting couch that have been given out for a century now. Nothing new here.

    • Replies: @njguy73
  65. peterike says:
    @Rurik

    But then I think of all those Mickey Mouse Club girls who turned into skanks,

    Indeed. Since Disney became (((Disney))), they have specialized in taking sweet, pretty young Gentile girls and turning them into shameless skanks. They have used their access to children, and the company’s reputation for wholesome entertainment (as it once was), to spread vile propaganda of every sort: elevating sluttish behavior, race mixing (now a constant of American entertainment), anti-white and anti-parent propaganda, you go grrllll feminism, homosexuality, on and on. All very deliberate.

    One wishes the great Walt Disney could return from the grave as an avenging angel and burn all these nation wreckers to ashes.

    • Replies: @Another Realist
  66. Moi says:

    The most honest article I’ve read in some time.

    PS: I laughed at Sweinstein

  67. Anon-og says:

    You got to love Illana’s Jewiness. She’s strokes white male ego to push her agenda and judging from the comments, it works every time. But her loyalty to her tribe is really something, she defends a perverted fellow Jew not directly but by pointing to societal ills, Hollywood ho’s and the Left without pointing out who this “Left” is and who controls its agenda. She talks about Hollywood’s gentile women being hoes without mentioning who has set the tone in Hollywood for this type of behavior to blossom in. It seems like in order for women to succeed in a Hollywood full of powerful moguls like Weinstein, these women have learned that success means catering to the perversions of the Weinsteins of Tinsel town. But she wont mention who has created this atmosphere, she won’t mention that Miley Cyrus and decadent pop culture from Mtv to the Music industry to Hollywood are run by her fellow Jews. She points to Pornography, but doesn’t want to name names or point out the tribal identity of the main purveyors of Pornography in America. She blames Feminism but won’t mention that it is a Jewish construct. At the root of it, she is a one issue gal and pushes an Israeli agenda where she emphasizes heavily the identities of guilty parties when they are Muslim but purposely ignores calling out the Jewish identities of the guilty when discussing their crimes. She’s a foot soldier for Israel. I mean who can care so much about America without ever mentioning this:

    To Get Hurricane Rebuilding Money in Texas, Contractors Must Promise They Won’t Boycott Israel

    https://theintercept.com/2017/10/19/to-get-hurricane-rebuilding-money-in-texas-contractors-must-promise-they-wont-boycott-israel/

    She would be all over it if this was Iran or some other Muslim country but does she ever acknowledge or let alone ever address Jewish and/or Israeli interference in our political process and First Amendment Rights.

    • Replies: @Art
    , @Sean
    , @Alden
    , @Old Left
  68. Art says:

    Strange — it seems that Harvey had the only casting couch in Tinsel Town. Hollywood is wall to wall Jews – yet NO new Jew names are being exposed by all those brave women. Only Gentile names.

    Hmm??? What could be going on?

    Stonewalling maybe – total fear absolutely!

    Say it isn’t so.

    p.s. Maybe Weinstein, Woody Allen, Polansky, and Weiner are the only sex obsessed Jews?

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @Another Realist
  69. Anon-og says:

    I wonder how many readers have done a backround check on this woman and her history of “journalism” if we can even call it anything like that. She is a pusher of Israeli propaganda and one of my favorite articles where she is called out is by Professor Kevin MacDonald who responds to her calling him an anti-Semite for having the courage to call out Jewish Neo-Cons :

    [MORE]

    WorldNetDaily columnist Jon Dougherty, in a notably wise and judicious article on Friday, deplored the fact that:

    In 2003 America, in order to silence their critics an increasing number of people no longer feel it’s necessary to debate with facts to prove their point. Instead, they choose to shout down detractors with infantile rhetoric, name-calling and insults …

    And Dougherty had the considerable courage to name the leaders in this trend: Abraham Foxman and the Anti-Defamation League. As I noted in my commentary in Vdare.com, the ADL has had no hesitation in pinning the label of “anti-Semite” on anyone who notices the Jewish backgrounds, the long history of pro-Israel activism, and close personal and professional relationships among the neocon cabal in the Bush administration.

    Ironically, a classic example of this “infantile rhetoric” appeared on WND the same day: Ilana Mercer’s column denouncing as “anti-Semitism” my discussion of neoconservatism on Vdare.com. Mercer provides an absurd caricature of my views on neoconservatism and other Jewish intellectual and political movements. She says that I depict the “gullible gentiles” in these movements as “marionettes” manipulated by wily Jews.

    Where do I say anything resembling that? In fact, I think that the motives of these non-Jews are a complicated mix of genuine belief and personal ambition. (The attractions of the neocon infrastructure in the media, politics and academe are obvious enough.) But my point remains: The founders and the core members of the movement are Jews who see their involvement as furthering Jewish interests.

    There is nothing inherently implausible about hypothesizing that minority activist movements like neoconservatism would be willing to recruit some majority group members. It makes excellent marketing sense to have at least some spokespeople who resemble the target audience. I have found numerous other examples in my work.

    Mercer also argues that the elected and senior appointed Bush administration officials, in the main not Jewish, ought to be held responsible for the “administration’s blunders.” This is true, but it does not in the least delegitimize consideration of what motivated the administration’s neoconservative members and friends – who generally are Jewish.

    Revealingly, Mercer places the term “Jewish ethnic interests” in quotes – as if to question that there is such a thing as Jewish interests at all. This is the core of the problem.

    We all accept that African-American leaders like Jesse Jackson are pursuing their perceived ethnic interests. No one would deny that the Mexican-American pro-immigration activists advocating open borders are pursuing their ethnic interests. But Jews are somehow exempted from anything so base as even having ethnic interests.

    For instance, Jewish pressure for U.S. support of Israel must be because Israel is a shining beacon of democracy – never mind the reality that Israel is (and is, arguably, perfectly entitled to be) an expansionist ethnostate. And Jewish support for mass immigration must be because they are liberals bent on “promoting justice.” But I believe I have demonstrated that the pro-immigration elements in American public life have, for over a century, been largely led, funded, energized and organized by the Jewish community as part of a conscious strategy to lessen U.S. ethnic and cultural homogeneity, a development Jewish leaders are on record saying is in their interests. My view of the critical role of Jewish organizations in altering U.S. immigration policy is a mainstream scholarly opinion (see, e.g., Hugh Davis Graham’s “Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America“; New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 56–57).

    Mercer may be right that it is a poor long-term strategy for Jews to allow the immigration of large numbers of Muslims. Some isolated Jews have worried about this, most notably Stephen Steinlight, a senior fellow at the American Jewish Committee. But to date, Jewish organizations have not abandoned their pro-immigration policies.

    Mercer, in an amazing gap in logic, accuses me of having a “messy habit of mind” for ignoring that “on issues of race and immigration, neocons are not that different from liberals.”

    But of course, that is exactly my point: Liberal immigration policy has been supported by the overwhelming majority of Jews across the Jewish political spectrum, and this is quite the opposite of traditional conservative attitudes. This is one reason why I believe the neoconservative preferences for mass immigration prove they are an ethnic, rather than an ideological grouping.

    I am a professional academic. My work has focused on the influence of the Jewish identity on intellectual, social and political life. Others laboring in parallel rows in the same vineyard chose to consider other ethnic groups. They are never attacked.

    Ilana Mercer reminds us that Freud said “sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.” Why is not scholarship sometimes only scholarship?

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2003/09/21013/#yfZmykWu4RqFdjPj.99

    This woman is a foot soldier for AIPAC, the ADL, Israel and Netanyahu and their campaign of Israel over America by any means including the erosion of American freedoms and American blood to achieve it.

  70. Art says:
    @Anon-og

    She’s a foot soldier for Israel. I mean who can care so much about America without ever mentioning this:

    To Get Hurricane Rebuilding Money in Texas, Contractors Must Promise They Won’t Boycott Israel

    Anon-og,

    I like your comments – they are clear, unambiguous, and pointed — Kudos.

    Think Peace — Art

    • Replies: @Anon-og
  71. Evocatus says:
    @DFH

    To be fair, not all of them were shiksas; some were goyish looking half-Jews like Gwyneth Paltrow.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  72. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @DFH

    The progressive shiksas have seriously asked for that. Was not it the US State Department that went full force to protect the Pussy Riot’s obscene “performance” in a church? Do you have daughters and if yes, do you really prefer Kardashians and Miley and the aging pathetic Madonna to be your daughters’ icons? https://joequinn.net/2014/02/26/pussy-riot-a-grotesque-creation-of-the-us-state-department/

  73. Anon-og says:
    @Art

    Likewise Art,
    I am seeing more and more why you are so consistent with pointing out the Jewish problem. Their ability to shape shift and manipulate Americans is impressive. I always look forward to her articles because she is such a classic example of a diverter and damage controller for the tribe.

    • Replies: @Art
  74. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @druid

    Hold your horses. Bill Clinton is Jewish?

    • Replies: @Another Realist
  75. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Thank G-d all this Hollywood perversion got our minds off the FBI’s ever changing story of what did or didn’t happen in Las Vegas.

    Amazing how that happens!

  76. Malla says:
    @Anon-og

    The left is not trying to neuter Islam at least not yet. Islam is being used as a tool to destroy the West by the same globalists. Wahabism is a globalist perverted version of Islam. I still remember that fundamentalist obnoxious Imam living in the UK, Anjem Choudhary coming on TV telling the British people to stay with the EU before the referendum. I rolling on the floor, laughing. I had known for some time that Anjem Choudhry was handled by MI5 (British version of the FBI used for internal espionage).
    Many of the migrants to Europe were telling them that they were funded and directed by NATO operatives in the Middle East.

    check from 4:40 to 5:50 minutes. The governments of the West are themselves are the greatest enemy of the people of the West and want to destroy the people of West. And Muslims are one of the weapons used. Other weapons include SJWs, femnazis and libtards.

    • Replies: @Anon-og
    , @Another Realist
  77. Sean says:
    @Anon-og

    I don’t think she is criticizing honest sex work in which the prostitute or porn performer touts for that type of business, gets paid an agreed price for the service provided, and does not subsequently complain about being taken advantage of.

  78. Malla says:
    @joe webb

    This ‘Shiksha’ attitude towards European women is very common among nearly all black and brown races. I had seen a Nigerian movie where this Nigerian villager guy goes to the UK and meets the ex girlfreind of his dead brother who had accumulated a lot of money in the UK. She is White British Blonde of course. She returns with him to the Nigerian village all because she wants that money. The Nigerian guy ignores his own black Nigerian wife in favour of the British blondie wife until the evil nature of blondie is exposed. Moral of the story: Nigerian Man do not leave your good pious (I want to laugh here) Nigerian woman for that beautiful White woman. One of those ‘What is beautiful Outside is Ugly inside and vice versa’ bullshit psychology which is mostly lies.

    I believe that a lot of the hatred and jealousy towards Whites amongst black and brown races stems a lot from the superior looks of White people (which the black browns, all deny on the surface) as well as the fact that Whites conquered the world, invented most of the technology we see today, have built successful nations etc… Body aesthetics (as well as aesthetics of traditional buildings and White culture in general) do definitely play a part in this jealousy. And hence the hatred and desire to rape and destroy of what they can never become, amongst the brown black races.Thissort of hatred is not that common among East Asians.
    And this hatred of the brown blacks is directed the most at Nordic looking Whites, the ones with light hair and/or light eyes.

  79. Alden says:
    @Jon Halpenny

    Absolutely right Mercer is defending one of her own.

    Some people think that the Weinstein exposure is to cover up the truth about the Las Vegas shooting.

  80. Alden says:
    @Anon-og

    I know all about her and her ANC father too.

  81. Sean says:
    @Art

    As I understand it, movies is a very high stakes business, and you cannot get cast in a role by being alone with an obviously-horny-as -a-jackrabbit producer and submitting to sex acts or harassment. It doesn’t guarantee anything, and they all knew it.

    Casting happens though getting an agent, who sends you to an audition, where there are other people around and the acts performed are of an acting nature. The only professional film actor I know cited Ellen Barkin’s acting as superlative. Barkin studied acting for ten years before landing her first audition.

  82. O/T: Steve, ESPN.com’s black online mag affiliate, “The Undefeated,” recently put out a revised 50 Greatest Players of All-Time list for the NBA. From the accompanying article:

    “We cut six players who either starred for or won championships for the Celtics”

    http://theundefeated.com/features/nba-50-greatest-players-remix

  83. Thomm says:
    @Priss Factor

    What proof do you have to support your claim?

  84. get used to it boys & girls. cultures always progress toward more openness unless thrown in reverse by some cataclysm.
    conservatives, no matter how repressed, can’t stop self-actualized liberation.

  85. Anon-og says:
    @Malla

    Mally,
    In my opinion, the big twin evils in the Middle East are Zionism(Israel) and Wahhabism(Saudi Arabia), their agendas are so identical that it looks like they serve the same masters. And Muslims from Yemen to Syria to Libya to Iraq to Palestine have literally had their nations destroyed by Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Western War machine so when you mention they are being weaponized I do see your point but it should also be mentioned that they have by far been the biggest victims in this. The world would be a better place if Gentiles in the West could wrestle back control of their respective nation’s foreign and domestic policies. The promotion of decadence and corruption domestically in a country like America allows for easier control of its politics, wealth and war machine. American gentiles of all colors have become the facilitators of Jewish power who sell out their own nation and people for money, power, fame and the general bag of goodies that the Weinstein’s and AIPACs of American and International Jewry offer. The Jews want you to lose your religion but they aren’t losing theirs, they want you to lose your identity as a nation but they are not even budging on theirs. Just look at Israel and then look what Jews push for here so I totally get what you are saying but that does not let us Americans off the hook either. I spend a lot of energy sending articles about the latest bills being passed that threaten our first amendment rights, other info regarding alarming issues and almost no American I know gives a shit.

    • Replies: @Another Realist
  86. I try to restrict devoting any of the precious time I have left on Earth to such matters. I made an exception for the Mercer column, which is spot on. 99% of the time, I merely see the unavoidable headlines and continue surfing for something worth the time to read or watch.

    My one take-away from l’affaire Weinstein is this: I am enormously enjoying the internecine, riotous and indiscriminate feeding frenzy it has generated. Like Heinlein’s Igli, the Left is consuming itself.

  87. Alden says:
    @Anon-og

    The stoning in the bible was done by Jews and the Jew Jesus stopped it. That’s the only mention of stoning in the Christian bible and the founder of Christianity forbade it. FGM is widespread in most Muslim countries as well as African ones. For example Egypt, about 85 percent. Saudi , Quatar, Oman about the same.

    It probably began in Africa and arabia long before islam but is widespread in both africa and all Muslim countries.muslims in America and Europe go to great lengths to practice it even though it is illegal.

    FGM itself may not be illegal, but mayhem, great bodily injury, assault, battery and sexual assault are illegal Mayhem and GBI generally have severe penalties

  88. Alden says:
    @Anon-og

    You are right about Mercer’s blaming the women rather than the Jewish men who control them.

    • Replies: @Anon
  89. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Yes, that’s what Zionists do. They defend Muslims.

    Stop for a minute and listen to yourself. You sound retarded.

    • Replies: @Wally
  90. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    How is German nationalism in the era of World War I related to the “skankification” of America?

    • Replies: @Thomm
    , @Wally
  91. @whorefinder

    Their existence is only to provide sexual pleasure to these perverts, and they like it; however, when something goes wrong, they howl and cry, ‘he raped me!” Reminds me when I was at a military base, and a friend of mine found his girlfriend screwing another guy, she claimed, well, rape! How appropriate. the poor guy was court martial-ed, and done with!

  92. njguy73 says:
    @wow

    I am 1000X more attractive and in far better shape that Harvey Fatstein. Yet he has tapped far better poon than I can ever hope to tap.

    You should have gone into show biz. If you’re what you claim to be, you’ve have tapped more poon than Justin Timberlake and John Mayer combined. And it would have all been consensual, so no worry about lawsuits.

  93. njguy73 says:
    @Eric the Manager

    If I had a daughter going to Hollywood, I’d give her the same warnings about scum-bags in the movie business and the casting couch that have been given out for a century now.

    Or as the philosopher of our times would say:

  94. Art says:
    @Anon-og

    I am seeing more and more why you are so consistent with pointing out the Jewish problem.

    Anon-og,

    The Jews are playing to the hilt their divide and conquer tactics in America.

    Look at us today – we are coming apart. Our race divide is getting critical. Our income divide is ever widening. We are being separated from our natural allies. For every word of caution, there are ten words dividing us. Our media left and right pushes chaos.

    This isn’t nature taking its course – it is intended.

    It is criminal in nature because it is planned – as chaos increases Jews gain more power.

    The one word they fear is “Jew” – when we say JEW – two plus two starts to make four.

    Think Peace — Art

    • Replies: @Sherman
  95. Thomm says:
    @Anon

    I see you have not yet experienced how stupid Wally is.

    • Replies: @Wally
  96. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon-og

    Alden’s response to you is perfectly correct. But you’d have a good point if you talked about MGM.

    Ms. Mercer is not defending Weinstein but attacking the women who allowed this to go on for decades. I declare a half-hearted “boycott” against Hollywood every time something like this happens; alas, this is rendered without force by the fact that I refuse to pay modern ticket prices for what is likely utter trash anyway.

  97. @Ludwig Watzal

    This is the most salient issue for me. I would like to hear from the women who simply said,

    “No.”

    I have my issues with Hollywood as to their politics and they do produce plenty of entertainment, so I that is worth watching o doubt I am going to stop going to the movies because they don’t like looking into the mirror.

    • Replies: @Alden
  98. It’s a minor point in her article, but Mercer has identified what’s unusual about Weinstein and Weiner: they wish to be objects of the gaze as well as its subjects. Men are generally visual, thus naughty magazines and videos, but women tend to be verbal, preferring bodice-rippers or more recently, the hideous _50 Shades_.

    On top of wanting to look at (and, if fortunate, touch) young, attractive female bodies, a not unusual desire in most men, the two Ws want the young, attractive female bodies looking at THEM, in all their membranous glory. Whether they are oblivious to the fact that women are less excited by close-ups of privates, even when attached to a handsomer man, than male porn-viewers, or whether being repellant is part of the thrill–Weinstein allegedly had a poo in front of one woman–their deviance from the Lacanian norm surely is significant.

    • Replies: @renfro
  99. Thomm says:
    @Lara

    I suspect she is most likely a trouble maker and desperate for attention. There are likely exceptions, but this tends to be my first reaction. It’s rarely the prettiest women who complain of sexual harassment.

    This is 100% true.

    Funny how the prettiest women don’t even seem to worried about it. That effectively proves the whole narrative of ‘sexual harassment’ and ‘rape culture’ to be a myth created by ugly twats.

  100. @utu

    If they do it for parking spots should anybody be surprised they do it for a movie career?

    Consider also that they do it because they, all of us, like it. The power, the control, the cash and prizes that these women routinely rack up in divorces, that’s part of it, but also. emd of day, Harvey wants to get a nut in a good looking girl. Who doesn’t? It worked for him for decades until he simply got too ugly to stomach. Manly, yes, but the girls like it too. The “Me Too” girls are popping up like Whack-a-moles, but what’s a guy with 150 million dollars to do? Pay em off, rent from Polanski and never come back..

  101. Old Left says:
    @Anon-og

    So if Jews did not exist, there’d be no pimps, no whores, no pornographers, no casting couches, no skanks, no randy porcine slobs, and no feminist shrews, and we’d all be living in a wholesome Aryan utopia of virginal blond maidens and noble white unicorns.
    It’s remarkable how antisemitic and feminist responses to this affair both cast the putative victims as passive naifs.
    I do not have to agree with Ilana Mercer on everything she’s ever written to acknowledge the bravery of her dissenting opinion.

    • Replies: @Anon-og
  102. Sherman says:
    @Art

    Hey Genius

    I think folks like you with your deformities are causing more destruction to the white race than Jews.

    Peace
    Sherm

    • Replies: @Art
  103. I tend to assume by default that Hollywood producers (Jewish or otherwise) pressure actresses to have sex, so even if Weinstein was particularly egregious, I wonder what he really did to ignite this shit-storm. He obviously pissed off the wrong person(s).

    • Replies: @marylou
  104. Anon-og says:
    @Old Left

    Agreed, I think Ilana makes a whole lot of sense, I just dont trust the motives of a hypocrite.
    Ilana prides herself on calling things what they are and so me saying that she should apply this logic to people of her own ethnicity is wrong? She calls everyone else out but never the Jews, could it be because she is also a Jew? It’s bad to point this out? Why should I pussyfoot, when does she ? She wolfs about how PC culture is bad but jumps to call someone like Professor MacDonald an anti-Semite for pointing out Jewish interests and power

    And also, so you’re saying that even though Jews play a large role in certain things it’s a point not worth making because these things existed before or would exist without Jews?

  105. I suppose Ilana catches serious raspberries from The Sisterhood over an article such as this?

  106. @Rurik

    Doesn’t explain the fact that Gwyneth Paltrow and both Corys (Feldman and Haim) were also targeted.

    I think you’re giving the perps more credit for discriminating tastes than they deserve.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  107. @Sergey Krieger

    Sergey, realistically, most women–especially the lumbering, low skill, know-nothing women of America–cannot possibly match the woman you put before us in the video above. They can’t measure up and they know it. So instead of dieting, exercising, taking voice lessons or even mastering humble talents like cooking and sewing they take the cowards way out and denigrate her. They will revile her as an unliberated woman who depends on male affirmation for her self esteem, an unwitting tool of the Patriarchy.

    While they, themselves? They don’t need to charm no stinking men. They themselves depend on their cohort of disagreeable feminists for their “self esteem”.

  108. Anon-og says:

    “Expect a feminist lecture about a woman’s right to pretend her bare bottom is haute couture, rather than ho couture, and expecting the Harveys of the world to behave like choir boys around her.”
    Some nerve.  If Ilana was Muslim rather than Jewish, and Weinstein was an Abdul, the gist of her message would be “how can you blame Abdul, these dirty slutty White women are asking for it, all while trying to present a generic Abdul to us, no reference to who he is and where his politics and loyalties lie . But of course, we know her well enough to know that if this was a scandal that involved an Abdul, the article would mostly be about who he was and how much of a threat his identity and belief system was to our culture.  Ilana, Weinstein is of your religion/ethnicity/tribe, is that not worth dedicating a few sentences to before going on a tirade about everything else.

    The Specifically Jewy Perviness of Harvey Weinstein

    http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/246724/the-specifically-jewy-perviness-of-harvey-weinstein

    [MORE]

    At first squint, Harvey Weinstein seems like a very familiar type. Isn’t he the old, same old, another rich, entitled, powerful man with a bad dye job abusing his might to coerce women into sex? Isn’t Harvey just like Roger Ailes, or Bill O’Reilly, or, for that matter, Bill Clinton? But look at the details of the case and you’ll see that the answer is no. Harvey is different. Harvey, sadly, is a deeply Jewish kind of pervert.
    As despicable as you may find Ailes, O’Reilly, and the other grabby goyim, you’ll recognize their behavior fits a pattern as old as time itself, as trite as Fox’s complaints about the “war on Christmas”: Men crave sex, and the worst of them will obtain it by whatever means necessary. These despicable gents have power and influence, and they aren’t above promising a lucrative gig—or threatening to take it away—to get laid. In these transactions, women are nothing but objects, and any “consent” is just an illusion. Morally, the men are no better than the pimps who crowd into James Franco’s character’s bar on The Deuce, the new HBO show; psychologically, they are no more complex than the johns. Cash in, cum out. The women are collateral damage.
    Harvey did something unique—no less odious, but different. Harvey performed. As we now are hearing (whether we want to or not), he allegedly made a woman watch as he masturbated into a potted plant. And if you want to understand this bizarre behavior, don’t look to Roger Ailes, or David Vitter, or Paul Crouch—look to Philip Roth.
    Better than perhaps any other author, Roth captured the particular anxiety of the Jewish American man in the twentieth century, finally coming into power but, having not grown up with it, unsure of what he’s supposed to do now. All those years craving unattainable Gentiles, but never before the means to entice them. The result is Alexander Portnoy of Portnoy’s Complaint, a grown man whose emotional and sexual life is still all one big performance piece, just as it had been when he was a teenager and pleasured himself with a piece of liver.
    As a boy, Portnoy fantasized about attaining a mythical shiksa goddess whom he nicknamed Thereal McCoy (get it?), who ice-skates “in her blue parka and her red earmuffs and her big white mittens—Miss America, on blades! With her mistletoe and her plum pudding (whatever that may be),” but as a grown-up he graduates to the real woman he nicknames The Monkey. And what does he do to abase her? He has her perform with an Italian whore. Yes, he eventually joins in, but not before they enact a bad movie—not Hollywood, but San Fernando Valley triple-X. And his nickname for her, The Monkey? That comes from an episode in her life, from before Portnoy met her, when a couple swingers picked her up and wanted her to eat a banana while she watched them copulate. For having a past that gets him hot, she gets degraded with an animalistic nickname. Her history as an actor is what he wants her for.
    Harvey is cut from the same cloth. Growing up in Queens, he fantasized of fame and fortune, and, once he got them, he struggled to maintain them by building himself into a larger-than-life figure. He yelled at employees like he was a studio boss from the 1920s—the only thing missing was a riding crop. He ran Oscars campaigns like they used to in Old Hollywood. And he harassed women not necessarily to use them as instruments of his pleasure, but to use them as instruments of his power.
    It goes without saying that nearly every one of these women—Rose McGowan, Ambra Batillana, Laura Madden, Ashley Judd, etc.—was a Gentile, all the better to feed Weinstein’s revenge-tinged fantasy of having risen above his outer-borough, bridge-and-tunnel Semitic origins. But it turns out there was a Jew(ess) in the bunch, none other than Lauren Sivan, of the potted-plant episode. In that small way, he inadvertently broke out of the Portnoy mold, performing his inadequacies not for the great all-American odeon but for a woman who could be his cousin. Harvey can run from who he is, but he can’t hide

  109. Rurik says:
    @Rosamond Vincy

    Corys (Feldman and Haim) were also targeted.

    well, if you’re suggesting that Hollywood is also a den of pedophilia and endemic child rape, you’ll get no argument here.

    I suppose the only ones who compete are the British aristocracy and possibly the Beltway swamp

    I remember watching some TV show called Spartacus, like an HBO show of some kind, and they showed this scene of a gladiator raping a boy, and they showed the boy smiling, like he was enjoying it, and I knew the depths of their depravity was an abyss, and if given their druthers, they’d normalize sex with children, which is one of the big agendas of the LGBT community, especially the homosexual men. They want to create the kind of society and culture as they imagine Rome to have been at its most decadent, where sex (rape) of children is considered normal, without raised eyebrows. Indeed, as it must have been at the Penn State locker room. Where even the ((dean)) knew what was going on.

    So yea, they’re very much aligned with the gay community with agendas that definitely dove tail.

    It’s obvious why the homos would also want to destroy Western civilization, as it’s the hated “Patriarchy’ that denies them the object of their lust.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2836062/Bombshell-documentary-Hollywood-pedophile-ring-preying-child-actors-s-linked-X-Men-director-Bryan-Singer-premiers-New-York.html

    “Oscar-nominated director Amy Berg admitted she had yet to find any company willing to distribute the disturbing 100-minute film.”

  110. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon

    Yes, Zionists do defend Muslims, when Muslims enter white gentile majority countries.

    In fact Jews / Zionists help Muslims enter gentile white countries, but ban Muslims from entering “that shitty little country”. Oops!

    But then, you’re a cowardly Zionist, so of course you want to hide those facts.
    Problem, we’re on to you. LOL

    And do stop projecting.

    Fake photos

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11427

  111. Wally says: • Website
    @Thomm

    IOW, juvenile ‘Thomm’ admits he cannot refute my posts.

    With no proof of ‘Nazi homicidal gas chambers’, no massive human remains that would necessarily exist, and no physical evidence by the thousands of tons that would be readily found IF the impossible ‘holocaust’ storyline was factual, we are then left with desperate, unhinged Zionists.

    tax exempt cash taken in by USHMM
    $151,826,695.00

    https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/042717-IRS-Form-990-FY16.pdf

    US Taxpayers money to to USHMM:
    56,999,500.00
    source: https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/20160209-fy17-pres-budget-request.pdf

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

  112. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon

    I suggest you ‘quit digging’ and actually read what one of your kind actually wrote:

    [MORE]

    “The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.”

    - from: ‘The Spirit Of Militarism’, by Nahum Goldmann
    Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress

    • Replies: @Anon
  113. @Rurik

    In addition, neither the Coreys nor Paltrow were “Aryans.” This goes far beyond what the Nazis would call “rassenschande.” Anyone youmg and vulnerable is a potential target.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  114. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Yes. He’s talking about Germans and German nationalism. That’s what the book is about.

    • Replies: @Wally
  115. gp says:

    “The conservative among us prefer the allure of modesty.” I’m a fan of 1970s-1980s Bollywood, with its casts of heart-stoppingly beautiful women, like Hema Malini and Sridevi, who performed in modest attire, and were all the more lovely for it. I can’t bear to watch today’s Bollywood product, featuring writhing undressed wenches indistinguishable from western gangsta ho’s. Decades ago, Indian film assimilation from western pop culture often yielded bizarre but charmingly cute mash-ups, but now they’ve mimicked the very worst of what we have. Or maybe now we have only cultural garbage left for them to adapt.

  116. Bayan says:
    @Wally

    I read somewhere that millions of Christians in Africa practice FGM. Not sure if FGM (female circumcision) is in the bible, probably not. But, male circumcision is, so some may have thought that making females equally religious is good.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @JGarbo
  117. renfro says:

    ” On social media, women outstrip men in the narcissistic and exhibitionist departments. In TV ads, American women, fat, thin, young and old, are grinding their bottoms, spreading their legs, showing the contours of their crotches, and dancing as though possessed (or like primates on heat), abandoning any semblance of femininity and gentility, all the while laughing like hyenas and hollering hokum like, “I Own It.”

    Yep its disgusting. Huge deformed asses bouncing around and screaming women stabbing their crotchs cant be a turn on to anyone but a Neanderthal …a desperate Neanderthal..

  118. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon-og

    Why don’t you stay on message? – Too painful for a pink pussy to face the truth?

    https://consortiumnews.com/2017/10/20/clinton-assange-and-the-war-on-truth/

    Here is the exemplary presstitute Sarah Ferguson from the ABC Australia:
    “Clinton shared responsibility for massively de-stabilizing the Middle East, which led to the death, suffering and flight of thousands of women, men and children. Ferguson raised not a word of it. Clinton repeatedly defamed Assange, who was neither defended nor offered a right of reply on his own country’s state broadcaster.”

    Here is another exemplary pink-pussy presstitute: “Ferguson’s executive producer, Sally Neighbour, re-tweeted the following: “Assange is Putin’s bitch. We all know it!”

    Don’t you see the trend, Anon-og? These females have been prostituting (presstituting) themselves for nice paychecks. They have zero dignity. They are Kardashians of the ABC Australia.

    “The ABC interviewer [Ferguson] lauded Clinton as “the icon of your generation.” She asked her nothing about the enormous sums Clinton creamed off from Wall Street, such as the $675,000 for speaking to Goldman Sachs, one of the banks at the center of the 2008 crash… This high-profile journalist made no mention of Clinton’s own “clear and present danger” to the people of Iran whom she once threatened to “obliterate totally,” and the 40,000 Libyans who died in the attack on Libya in 2011 that Clinton orchestrated. … there’s more than 1,700 emails out of the 33,000 Hillary Clinton emails that have been published, just about Libya. “… there is an internal document called the Libya Tick Tock and it’s the chronological description of how Clinton was the central figure in the destruction of the Libyan state, which resulted in around 40,000 deaths within Libya; jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in, leading to the European refugee and migrant crisis. “Not only did you have people fleeing Libya, people fleeing Syria, the destabilization of other African countries as a result of arms flows, but the Libyan state itself was no longer able to control the movement of people through it.”

    Clinton is a war criminal, but various pink pussies, some stupid and some opportunistic, still genuflect before the Butcheress of Libya. Ilana is right to call them out.

  119. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden

    Do you have a detailed apologia for the women mentioned in this article? For the Pussy Riot scum? For Hilary Clinton? For Kardashians, Miley and such? Perhaps you need to re-read the article.

  120. Art says:
    @Sherman

    I think folks like you with your deformities are causing more destruction to the white race than Jews.

    So you agree that Jews are doing “destruction” to the white race.

    I am honored that you think that I and a very few others are more powerful than 15,000,000 Jews and their 1,678,376,426 billion trillion dollars.

    Hmm — You may be wrong!

    Think Peace — Art

    p.s. Especially with my meager grammar skills.

    • Replies: @JGarbo
  121. renfro says:

    This is what they ruining our children with…..in a magazine for 11 to 15 year olds.

    Anal Sex: What You Need to Know | Teen Vogue

    https://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

    Jul 7, 2017 – This is everything you need to know about anal sex, from how to start out to what to expect once you get there

    Todd’s American Dispatch
    July 18th
    Parents outraged over Teen Vogue anal sex how-to column (but magazine still defends it)
    By Todd Starnes, Fox News

    Teen Vogue is defending its decision to publish a graphic tutorial to anal sex for children and teenagers – calling critics homophobic.
    “This is anal 101, for teens, beginners and all inquisitive folk,” author Gigi Engle wrote in “A Guide to Anal Sex.”

    “Anal sex and anal stimulation can be awesome, and if you want to give it a go, you do that,” wrote Engle, a self-described sex educator. “More power to you.”the original article did not include any references to practicing safe sex – but was later amended to include a line about condoms being “non-negotiable.”
    Phillip Picardi, the magazine’s digital editorial director, fired back in a flurry of tweets – culminating with a photo of him embracing another man while holding up his middle finger.
    Picardi then played the phobic-card – a favorite among liberals.
    “The backlash to this article is rooted in homophobia,” he wrote. “It’s also laced in arcane delusion about what it means to be a young person today.”

    • Replies: @Another Realist
  122. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon

    No, he’s talking about Zionist led communism.

    As if the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress would talk of anything else.

    Are you really that thick?

    again:

    “The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.”

    from: ‘The Spirit Of Militarism’, by Nahum Goldmann
    Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress

  123. Wally says: • Website
    @druid

    Got one. A nice, rather prosperous one at that.

    And you?

    Mother and I used to get up at four in the morning [at Belsen], to avoid the queues of people waiting to use the shower block about and hour later. We undressed and showered our bodies with ice-cold water. The only soap we had was a barrel of honey-coloured liquid soap, manufactured out of human flesh from the bodies of people shot by the SS on the transports. Many times we wondered: ‘Could this be my brother, my sister, another relation?

    - Gena Turgel nee Goldfinger, I Light a Candle, London: Grafton, 1987, p. 102.

    http://forum.codoh.com/download/file.php?id=1316

    • LOL: Alden
    • Replies: @Anon
  124. Wally says:

    The reasons for FGM are quite different than those that are espoused about male circumcision.

  125. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    You wouldn’t know because you haven’t read the book, as it’s never been translated into English. Some Jew hater decades ago translated some lines out of context and suggested they were about Jews or Zionists or whatever, and because you are gullible and utterly credulous, you bought it.

    The book was published in 1915. It was part of a series entitled “The German War,” published in Germany to drum up support for the ongoing war effort. It’s available online here:

    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=osu.32435017233032;view=1up;seq=8;skin=mobile

    If you can demonstrate that this book is about Zionism, I’ll apologize to you.

    • Replies: @Wally
  126. joe webb says:
    @Malla

    Then there is the skin-lighteners sold all over the colored world, including China

    White skin privilege. Yup…a nature given fact of life. Natural privilege, if you want to use the word privilege….a misuse of it.

    Natura facts, like the sun rising in the east….or White people inventing liberty and rule of law and just about all the science in the world.

    Just the facts ma’m. Which race abolished slavery? Which race invented everything almost? Which race invented free speech? Which race never enslaved its women? Which race saves the whales? Which race sends missionaries all over the world? Which race invents crazy Ideas? like racial equality?

    Which race turns the other cheek way too much? O, and which race does all the extreme sports? Which race discovered and conquered the world.
    ? tough shit colored folks….the only way you can conquer us is with your babies and immigration.

    We are starting to stand our ground. Watch out, you r next. Out you go.

    Joe Webb

    • Replies: @Rdm
    , @Malla
    , @Alden
  127. @Greg Bacon

    I kind of wondered about that when,years ago,I saw this filthy piece of trash named,yes that’s right,Maddona,become a Superstar of Women by her smutty trashy and ho-ish (funny you don’t look ho-ish) yet catchy music. Women are trashy by nature.

  128. They become degenerate later? Dunno about that.
    Let’s say you’re the big cheese behind the hottest script of the year. Hell,the decade!
    It’s “The Shirley Klotzky Story.” The amazing TRUE story about how Shirley grew up in the south,and was molested by a local preacher. She shoots him. She joins the Army,becoming a Ranger and winning the Navy Cross,the first Army member to do so. She has a passionate affair with a handsome ISIS badboy. He abuses her. She loses self esteem but regains it when she shoots him.
    She returns to America and has a passionate affair with a black drug dealer who is also a math savant.
    When he is accepted to medical school,she is happy. The next day the police shoot him. She adopts a Negro who grows up to be a star football player.
    She receives a letter from a Jewish woman stating that she was adopted and her real family are holocaust survivors and they want to meet her and her son Devonte.
    As the movie closes she is hugged tightly by her mom,her grandfather Shlomo,her rabbi,with whom she has found true love,and Devonte,who tells her he is gay.
    Now you gonna tell me you wouldn’t be besieged by young ambitious and sexy actresses?
    And no “tender”offers would be made? Hmmm?

  129. @Wally

    That picture!Says it all!LOL!

  130. geokat62 says:
    @Anon-og

    I wonder how many readers have done a backround check on this woman and her history of “journalism” if we can even call it anything like that.

    Well done, Anon-og. As Cynthia McKinney admonished her American compatriots “you’ve got to know who’s who in the zoo.”

    As such, background checks is a mandatory prerequisite in my books, before reading or listening to what someone has to say.

    I encourage all Unzers to do the same.

  131. @Jon Halpenny

    Perhaps she is; Jews do tend to close ranks on matters of tribe. But her main points (about the hypocrisy and faux shock and outrage from those who know very well how the industry has worked from it’s inception) are still valid.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  132. @Ben10

    Judeo-Christian values. Just ask any cuckservative.

  133. The main lesson here is to turn off the TV and withdraw all kinds of support for the Media Complex (including the professional (and “collegiate”) sports leagues). Resist mind control/altered reality, and hit them in the pocketbook to boot.

  134. Rdm says:
    @Malla

    Superior looks of White women

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
  135. marylou says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Could not agree more.

    This sleeping your way to success is not only practiced in the movie industry.
    The whole thing is old hat, and everybody should know it.
    So why all the ballyhoo now? What is up?

  136. Rdm says:
    @joe webb

    Just the facts ma’m. Which race abolished slavery?
    Qin Dynasty
    You want to assume it’s White race.

    Which race invented everything almost?
    Assuming Christ actually existed, it’s mostly Chinese before Christ. Afterwards it’s mostly White.
    You want to claim it’s all White race all along.

    Which race invented free speech?
    Freedom of speech belongs to everyone. The notion becomes specious if it’s free speech or hate speech. You can say you don’t like Obama. It’s free speech. However, if you bring up your personal preference as in Obama’s black skin, his ancestry, his nose, all of those makes you hate him on personal ground, it’s becomes dubious if you’re employing free speech or hate speech.
    You want to claim it’s White race.

    Which race never enslaved its women?
    Do I need to labor? All race enslaved their women.

    Which race saves the whales?
    Ugh… which race eat the horse meat as state delicacy?

    Which race sends missionaries all over the world?
    Sending missionaries all over the world is not something to be proud of. First, I don’t believe in God. So sending missionaries does not necessarily save me from hell and send me to heaven.

    Which race invents crazy Ideas? like racial equality?
    No race invented racial equality. The politically correct version of racial equality speech in America is a cop-out to cater to the needs of rising awareness of many people around the world

    Joe, are you still taking that medication? Doc said never miss a day. It seems you’re missing for like a few days. If you’d miss for a month, you’d become another Stephen Pad-dog.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Another Realist
  137. geokat62 says:
    @Anon-og

    [Mercer] is a pusher of Israeli propaganda and one of my favorite articles where she is called out is by Professor Kevin MacDonald who responds to her calling him an anti-Semite for having the courage to call out Jewish Neo-Cons..

    I enjoyed reading the MacDonald article you referenced.

    Speaking of Prof. MacDonald, if you’d like to get a completely different perspective on the primary causal factors that underpin this latest uproar, I highly recommend reading his recent article, Harvey Weinstein: Revenge and Domination as Jewish Motives

    I’ll leave you with the concluding paragraph:

    The displacement of Whites is advertised in high-flown rhetoric about universal peace and brotherhood, but fundamentally it is motivated by revenge, hatred, and the desire to dominate and dispossess. The implications are obvious: for Whites to become a minority in a society with a strong Jewish presence among the elite and surrounded by hostile minorities motivated by leftist, anti-White identity politics would be a cataclysmic disaster for our people. We must do everything we can to avoid this.

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/10/20/harvey-weinstein-revenge-and-domination-as-jewish-motives/#more-154887

    • Replies: @Alden
  138. I wonder if Rocketman has an ICBM that can reach LA. Sure hope so.

  139. Wally says:
    @Anon

    Anon, thinking he’s being profound, said:
    “It was published in 1915″, well yes, during the rise of Jew led communism.

    Thanks for emphasizing that.

    Pay attention, I have already demonstrated that it’s about communism/ Zionism.

    Nahum Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress

    even the Jew dominated Wiki spills the bans:

    Nahum Goldmann was a leading Zionist and the founder and longtime president of the World Jewish Congress.
    wikipedia.org

    Oh ouch !!
    But Zionist Anon desperately lies by claiming Goldmann was a ‘German nationalist’. Laughable.
    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Anon
  140. Wally says:
    @Rdm

    We can play that game.

    Superior looks of Jew women:


    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Rdm
    , @Rdm
  141. SMK says: • Website
    @TheJester

    The “sexual revolution” of the 1060′s was created by men to liberate women, sexually, for the benefit of men who could now have sex outside of marriage. Thus the birth of “free love” among the “New Left” and “huppie” culture. The “women’s liberation” movement that emerged in 1970 was in some ways a neo-puritanical reaction to the “sexual revolution” and its abuse and exploitation of women as “sex objects” as “radical feminists” urged women not to dress and look sexy and feminine (no make-up, “butch” hair, hairy legs, etc.) and to have sex with women rather than men. Midge Decter wrote an anti-feminist book in the 1970′s entitled “The New Chastity and Other Arguments Against Women’s Liberation.”

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Jonathan Mason
  142. marylou says:
    @Father O'Hara

    It takes two to tango Father.

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
  143. @gp

    like Hema Malini

    Oh, Man–the sentimental tear rolled down my chick, we grew up with Sholay (Revenge and Law in Soviet movies) as kids;)

  144. Bronson says:

    I would agree with the author in her pointing out that these “women” knew very well what they were getting into – it was never a secret to them. There was no “surprise” there, nor should there have been. It’s like a guy walking through the worst neighborhood at night with $50 bills hanging out of his pockets claiming that getting mugged was a “surprise” … duh.

    One would notice that a majority of these names coming out – sexual predators and perverts – are Jewish names. Hollywood is completely controlled by Jews – a fact that anyone who has worked in that environment knows very well. Many of these people are Satanists – and you readily see their perversion pervading the movies they make. Audiences who’s “filters” are down due to the fact they are being “entertained” don’t resist this programming – so garbage goes straight to the subconscious to pop up later as “beliefs” and “tolerance” for crassness and perversions that people would never have accepted before.

    The Sabbatean-Frankists are Satanists who believe in “redemption through evil”. Their Messiah will only return to murder all of their enemies and enslave the remaining goyim when the World becomes irredeemably perverse and chaotic. They eagerly advocate the destruction of marriage and family, and promote any sexual perversions imaginable … incest, pedophilia, bestiality, etc. The Sabbatean-Frankists have immense power because the Rothschild banking syndicate belongs to this cult. Sabbatean-Frankist Jews were behind the creation and spread of Communism and Zionism – and they currently control virtually all forms of media. Satanism and Communism are spewed non-stop from televisions and movie theaters, and 99% of viewers don’t have a clue.

  145. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    First, I didn’t say Goldmann was a German nationalist not did I dispute that he was a Zionist. I said the book you’re quoting, which you haven’t read, is about German nationalism.

    But here’s the publisher’s note about Goldmann:

    In früher Jugend nach Deutschland gekommen, ist er in seinem Denken und Empfinden ein so guter Deutscher geworden, daß er diese schöne Schrift für Deutschland schreiben konnte.

    Would a publisher of a series entitled “The German War” write that note about a book about Zionism?

    Your refusal to concede this point is remarkable only because of the weight of evidence against you.

    • Replies: @Wally
  146. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @SMK

    You don’t think people were having sex outside marriage before the 1960s? That explains a lot

    • Replies: @SMK
  147. Rurik says:
    @Rosamond Vincy

    “Aryans.” This goes far beyond what the Nazis would call “rassenschande.” Anyone youmg and vulnerable is a potential target.

    of course

    I posted those Nazi propaganda cartoons simply to show how Weinstein-ish they look, and the obvious parallels to the Weimar regime.

    the serial predators in Hollywood will happily victimize all races and nationalities if they the victims are young enough

    >>><<<

    but I do suspect, that there is a certain amount of glee for Weinstein types when their victims are especially Aryan-looking, because of the hysterical narrative (today's virtual state religion) we've all marinated in 24/7 about the uniquely evil (Aryan-looking) Nazis who victimized (removed from power) all those Jews, many of whom were related to the Hollywood moguls.

    do you think it's just possible… in the slightest way, that some Jews might- under the right circumstances, feel vindictive towards those whom they feel have victimized them in the past?

    Eh?

    I'm not talking personally victimized anyone, but even the descendants of Nazis for instance. Do you ever wonder if Hollywood Jews might be inclined to persecute and/or demonize living Germans today for the perceived crimes of their ancestors?!

    what do you think? Yes? No? Maybe?

    and that if a Jewish man (or black for that matter), with a persecution complex, [redundant?] had an opportunity to debase a particularly Aryan-looking girl, that he’d take special pleasure in doing so?

    indeed, isn’t it just possible that there are very many Jews (and homosexuals and blacks and others…) who use their positions in Hollywood (and other spheres of cultural influence) to enact revenge on the (mostly white, putatively Christian, culturally conservative) American majority for all the perceived persecutions and slights and ‘racism’ that they’ve all suffered so terribly over the eons and even today, as the new orange Hitler is now ensconced in the White House?

    or is such a suggestion absurd and possibly anti-Semitic for even suggesting it?

  148. Rdm says:
    @Wally

    So which one you agree?

    1.) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder or

    2.) Beauty is the product of Hollywood propaganda?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Alden
  149. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon-og

    Anon-og,

    You are a clueless hick.

    ‘Goes “back” to the Bible’. But what doesn’t? LOL

    Indeed, ‘Christians no longer engage in it’. Thank you.
    But Muslims do.
    Now shoot your other foot.

    BTW:
    Here’s a rather long list:

    http://news.trust.org//item/20130927165059-w9g0i

  150. Wally says:

    Anon-og, aka: ‘peg boy‘.

    You are now owned & in over your head.

    Talk nicer next time.

    The stoning in the bible was done by Jews and the Jew Jesus stopped it. That’s the only mention of stoning in the Christian bible and the founder of Christianity forbade it. FGM is widespread in most Muslim countries as well as African ones. For example Egypt, about 85 percent. Saudi , Quatar, Oman about the same.

    Hurts, don’t it?

  151. Wally says:
    @Rdm

    3. Jews are generally a very ugly people, in many ways.

    Which results in their envy of others.

  152. Wally says:
    @Anon

    My points, which you dodged as usual, stand.

    Other people can read, you know.

    You? Not so much.

    • Replies: @Anon
  153. @Evocatus

    That has to be one of the stupidest, most pointless, irrelevant, worthless comments I’ve ever read anywhere online. Congratulations. You win the Darkie Low-IQ of the Year Award.

    • Replies: @Evocatus
  154. SMK says: • Website
    @Anon

    Of course they were -but not nearly as many or in as many ways with as many partners.

  155. Truth says:
    @Colleen Pater

    I haven’t seen a negro involved yet.

    • Replies: @Colleen Pater
  156. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    They can read this then too:

    https://www.queens.ox.ac.uk/road-war

    I proved you wrong. You know it and everyone here knows it. I addressed all your points and you’ve addressed none of mine. You’re dodging.

    For someone so vigilant about how other people supposedly lie, you lie a bunch. Either that, or you’re stupid.

    • Replies: @Wally
  157. renfro says:
    @Rosamond Vincy

    ” Weinstein allegedly had a poo in front of one woman–their deviance from the Lacanian norm surely is significant.”

    That’s interesting because one of the tactics/habits of the Israeli IDF is to defecate on the floors of Palestine homes.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    , @Art
  158. @Rurik

    Is it possible? Of course it’s possible. Eldridge Cleaver described this sort of revenge-rape in _Soul on Ice_. (He, however, practiced for white victims on black women–that this sick puppy was a liberal hero for a while boggles the mind.)

    Mayim Bialik was recently slammed for suggesting that she was protected from most of this stuff by bring a character actress who’s never been considered a beauty. The feminists tried to rip her a new one over that. Was she also protected by being Jewish? We can’t ask Hedy Lamarr or Lauren Bacall if they had to fend off creeps, or whether the deciding factor was the fact that they were both stunningly beautiful or the likelihood that Hollywood hid stars’ ancestries then.

    BTW, a woman has released the story that when she was 10, she was exploited by Polanski–with the full complicity of her mother, who sounds straight out of _The Godfather_. I suppose corrupting kids bears the same challenge as gays trying to “bring over” straight men.

    • Replies: @Alden
  159. @renfro

    Don’t we often see claims that Hitler had a sexual thing for feces? I’m detecting some projection here…

  160. renfro says:
    @Rurik

    No its not absurd and they don’t have to be victimized to express their hate and hostility toward Gentiles. They did it all during the Weimar Republic, the most depraved society of the 20th century, when they were at the height of their control of Germany. They went too far then. They are going too far now.

    ”Whilst large sections of the German nation were struggling for the preservation of their race, we Jews filled the streets of Germany with our vociferations. We supplied the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter and administered to its religious beliefs in the manner we considered suitable. We ridiculed the highest ideals of the German nation and profaned the matters which it holds sacred. ”
    — Dr Manfred Reifer, in the German Jewish magazine Czernowitzer Allegemeine Zeitung, September 1933

    In the same month those words were written, September 1933, Adolf Hitler removed every single Jew from positions of influence in the mass media: from the fields of literature, art, music, journalism, the cinema, and popular entertainment in general [32]. The influence that the Jews had exerted on the German psyche was to be regarded henceforth, rightly or wrongly, as pernicious. And Kulturbolschewismus, or “Bolshevik culture”, a derogatory term for Jewish culture itself, became synonymous with moral anarchy and sexual decadence.

    Witness to History

    https://books.google.com/books?id=ibyPDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT38&lpg=PT38&dq=Dr+Manfred+Reifer&source=bl&ots=AB4y0048D2&sig=SmOfqA1PDBFUTKMdnwCvP7BcgUE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio3L3RyoLXAhVB5oMKHRrNDiA4ChDoAQhcMA8#v=onepage&q=Dr%20Manfred%20Reifer&f=false

    Our Own Felicity: We Make Or Find

    https://books.google.com/books?id=QrYwp2yM0u0C&pg=PA159&lpg=PA159&dq=Dr+Manfred+Reifer&source=bl&ots=UeomVSY7mk&sig=eSVewgLcd26Ib9QhZi461KnLSs8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjEwNKw0ILXAhVj1oMKHV9iAvY4FBDoAQglMAA#v=onepage&q=Dr%20Manfred%20Reifer&f=false

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @Rurik
  161. Rurik says:

    a woman has released the story that when she was 10, she was exploited by Polanski–with the full complicity of her mother, who sounds straight out of _The Godfather_.

    exactly what I thought of when I read the account

    and that the mother set it up in the hopes that the daughter might become a starlet, and the mother’s ticket to easy street, is not too far out there for me to accept, especially as you see these mothers dressing their toddlers up as skanks and teaching them to ‘whore it up’ to win a “beauty” pageant.

    …….

    Lauren Bacall has always been a favorite of mine, even tho I’m much, much younger, there’s still the celluloid

    OMG she was gorgeous!

    I doubt Hollywood was quite so over-the-top slimy back then as it is today, but then who knows. As you mention, it was even mentioned in The Godfather, written in 69. From memory having read the book so long ago, the child from the novel was very young.

  162. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon

    Your link is bizarrely irrelevant, But hey, you are irrelevant.

    You’re a just another cowardly, dimwitted Zionist and you keep proving it over & over again. Embarrassing really.

    You could never best me in a million years.

    In fact, your record of being slapped silly is available for all to see at:
    http://www.forum.codoh.com

    • LOL: Alden
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Alden
  163. @Rurik

    Uh-oh, now Lupita N’yongo is claiming Weiny tried his game on her too.
    I’m seriously thinking this guy doesn’t have aesthetic preferences. He’d do a knothole in a tree if you could just convince him the knothole was reluctant.

    • Replies: @Alden
  164. @Rurik

    She was about 12. Some of the parents are more sickening than the predators; you’d expect the producers to be a bunch of snakes, but mammals usually protect their own young.

  165. @marylou

    Sadly,the majority of men go begging,becoming the ultra ass kissers they are,while the most handsome and sexy men bang women with ease. Most men lose under this system.

  166. Art says:
    @renfro

    That’s interesting because one of the tactics/habits of the Israeli IDF is to defecate on the floors of Palestine homes.

    Scat is a well covered subject in the Talmud. It is kind of a Jewish thing.

    • Replies: @Rosamond Vincy
  167. Art says:
    @Rurik

    Two great pictures. There is something about that old photography that enhances beauty.

  168. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Yeah, that link that describes a German book you can’t read.

    • Replies: @Wally
  169. Malla says:
    @Rdm

    Rdm
    I never claimed all White people are more attractive but was talking about average White people features as well as diversity in eye and hair colour. I am a brown man living in a brown country and have met many people of other brown and black lands and have lived with them , I know what I speak of. There is this massive jealousy of White people, a kind of hatred of the inferior for the superior. And instead of inculcating some of the qualities of the superior, they want to burn down the White world in hatred instead. I have observed this from my childhood. I have not observed this among North East Asians to that extent. This attitude hatred is most intense amonst Africans, Middle Easterners and people from the Indian subcontinent. Even Iranians do not display this attitude to that extent.
    It is as if why did God give these beautiful people with a sophisticated culture more intelligence to create all these technology etc… and make them so good in sports. Gives brown peoples an inferiority complex feeling. At least black people do preety well in sports.
    Your post is the exact way how brown blacks behave when this reality is faced. Show photos of the ugliest White people, make stupid statements how ‘Whites have no culture’, or ‘White culture came from us’ etc… I remember one such incident where one such fellow brown was making the same claim that there is not White culture while we have an ancient culture etc.. blah blah blah. I showed him some videos of folk and classical European culture and I could see the horror in his face, he was terrified. It is as if White people have been stocked with too many superior qualities, there is no balance. As in White people could have got the looks and us browns could have got the culture/ brains. But no Whites have the looks and the brains and their armies have conquered the world to name a few. That creats fear, hatred and inferiority complex feelings.

    Also I must add us brownies and all the other darkie races I have come across are all arrogant people with superiority complex feelings. It is just that the presense/ achievements of White people rain on our superiority complex parade.

    • Replies: @Rdm
  170. Malla says:
    @Rdm

    I am talking about averages, ofcourse there are ugly and beautiful specimen in very race.

    Average German football supporters

    [MORE]

    Average Dutch football supporters

    Average Polish Football supporters

    Average Indian Cricket supporters

    Russian soldiers

    Russian female soldiers

    Indian soldiers

    Indian female soldiers

    Nigerian soldiers

    Nigerian female soldiers

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Alden
    , @Rdm
  171. Malla says:
    @joe webb

    There is also an attitude of ‘impregnating, marrying or just having sex with White women is a way to get back at the superior White man’ (while keeping our women away from the White man) amongst the brown black masses. Explains all the raping of White girls by Pakistani grooming gangs in Britain as well as this Sweinstein. But I believe Swenstein also tapped some black and Asian women to give some variety to his diseased dick.

  172. Malla says:
    @Rdm

    Just the facts ma’m. Which race abolished slavery?
    Qin Dynasty

    The Qin stopped slavery where most of the slaves were fellow Han or other similar Northern Mongoloid populations. The Qin would not have cared at all about slavery of blacks by other blacks. It is the British and the French who sent their navies to stop slavery of a people of a completely different race.

    Which race invented everything almost?
    Assuming Christ actually existed, it’s mostly Chinese before Christ. Afterwards it’s mostly White.

    No doubt people of other races have contributed to the technological progress of man, but the overwhelming majority of all modern inventions were done by Europeans and their descendants worldwide.

    Which race invented free speech?
    Freedom of speech belongs to everyone.

    It may belong to everyone but these concepts came out of Europe/America. Everywhere else, people were slaves to their lords and would have remained so to this day had Europeans not conquered the world.

    Which race never enslaved its women?
    Do I need to labor? All race enslaved their women.

    But compared to the rest of the world, Europeans always treated their women better. Even Schopenhauer lambasted Europeans for the excess respect the men show to their women.

    Which race sends missionaries all over the world?

    Sending missionaries all over the world is not something to be proud of. First, I don’t believe in God. So sending missionaries does not necessarily save me from hell and send me to heaven.

    I am no Christian meself, but missionaries have done a lot of work to eradicate social evils in the world. Missionaries played a big role in stopping Sati in India, stopping slavery in Africa and the Middle East, starting schools for lower caste Hindus who were treated like crap by the upper castes etc…. Indeed White missionaries are responsible for writing the first dictionaries of many of the languages of the Indian subcontinent.

  173. Malla says:
    @Malla

    I might further add that celebrities of brown lands tend to look more closer to Europeans with stronger Caucasoid facial features than the common people in the streets in these countries.
    For example lets take Bollywood

    This is Bollywood actor Amir Khan

    [MORE]

    Bollywood actor Hritick Roshan

    Bollywood Actress Rani Mukherjee

    Bollywood actress Karishma Kapoor

    Bollywood Actress Madhubala

    Bollywood Actor Feroz Khan

    Bollywood Actor Shammi Kapoor

    Average people in India who show more Australoid facial features mixed with some Caucasoid.

    https://images.csmonitor.com/csmarchives/2010/08/0830-MTHORAT-thorat-india-slums.jpg?alias=standard_600x400

  174. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon

    It’s revealing that your link, in English (oops) quotes no text from Zionist Goldmann’s book to support your absurd position.

    And remember when you, a Zionist, insisted Goldmann was NOT a Zionist? LOL

    again:

    Nahum Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress

    even the Jew dominated Wiki spills the bans:

    Nahum Goldmann was a leading Zionist and the founder and longtime president of the World Jewish Congress.
    wikipedia.org

    I owe my permission to submit the Zionist plan for the final solution of the Jewish Question.”

    - ‘Father of political Zionism’ Theodor Herzl, letter to the Czar, November 22, 1899.

    • Replies: @Anon
  175. SMK says: • Website
    @whorefinder

    In respect to the women HW harassed, molested, and raped and women generally, Ilana’s article is a melange of half-truths, exaggerations, over-generalization, cherry-piacking, and confirmation bias. She’s too soft on HW and too hard on the women, and especially women generally. Though I agree with her about the hysteria over this matter and that Sean Hannity referring to all the women he abused as “naive, innocent your things” is not only false but ridiculous.

    But not as false and absurd as F. Roger Devlin, the pathological misogynist and MRA sympathizer, claiming that women are as “sexually depraved” as men: i.e., as salacious, promiscuous, aberrant, sexually aggressive, violent, brutal, sadistic, predatory, degenerate, etc., as males. Only someone whose view of female sexuality is derived solely or largely from watching and reading pornography, and/or from visiting MRA websites and reading the articles and comments, to which Devlin has confessed, could seriously argue that women are as “sexually depraved” as men.

    Yes, this explains the existence of a multi-billion dollar pornography industry and a multi-billion dollar prostitution/dominatrix industry catering almost exclusively to males. The only world in which females are as “sexually depraved” as males in the world of hard-core pornography, a largely fictional world in which women are paid billions of dollars to satiate the desires and indulge the fantasies of men onanistically.

    This explains why men commit 99% of violent sexual assaults -over 90% of which are rapes, which only males can commit in the pure and literal sense of the word- and why black men on average are 1000′s of times more likely than “Asian” females to commit violent sexual assaults.

    • Replies: @Anon
  176. @Rurik

    When I saw The Big Sleep for the first time, I went straight out and bought a black-and-white houndstooth suit like the one Bacall wears in the scene where she’s sitting on Bogart’s desk, scratching her knee and passing the phone back and forth. Whoa….

    Which brings up another point. The Hays Code forced H’wood to find clever ways to imply what could not be shown or said. The results were more memorable and entertaining than the dreary “openness” of the present day: Bogey and Bacall discussing “racehorses” in the same film, one Golddiggers chorus girl telling another, “Don’t worry sister, you’ll have a job as long as there are sidewalks,” the famous cut from Rhett carrying Scarlett up the stairs to the shot of her singing and smirking in bed until even Mammy looks at her suspiciously.

    Just try to imagine the famous “stinkin’ badges” line from Sierra Madre with the ubiquitous F word. Not as powerful, is it?

    Sure, H’wood was always corrupt. But the scriptwriters had to write, and the actors had to act. Without a subtext, it’s not acting, just reciting, and that’s why so much that H’wood churns out is so boring.

    • Agree: renfro
    • Replies: @Rurik
  177. @Art

    Also Austrian, apparently. Mozart and his correspondents were always asking each other about their bowel movements.

    • Replies: @Alden
  178. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Nowhere did I suggest that Goldmann wasn’t a Zionist. You’re lying. Again.

  179. DaveE says:
    @Malla

    “This is the result of decades of Cultural Marxism, MK Ultra mind control programming, Monarch programming of our celebrities, Predictive Programming, Trauma based programming, modern art…….”

    It’s really a lot simpler than that. More like the result of 2,700 years of “We’re chosen, you’re not” indoctrination. That entitles US to literally take ANYTHING we want. The techniques you mention above were all developed as a result of the underlying ideology, which guides everything.

    I personally know some of the Chosen who run some our local small-town media companies and I hear a lot of stories……. and we’re a long way from Hollywood, where I also worked.

    Sweinstein is not an aberration, he is the norm. The culture is a lot bigger and deeper rooted than any one individual, no matter how repugnant “he” may be.

    But I’ll give credit to Ms. Mercer where credit is due. This piece is a reasonably well-disguised “blame the victim” argument. Just in time for Halloween.

    • Replies: @Anon
  180. Rdm says:
    @Malla

    Employing your logic, would it be fair to say, Whites were once immensely jealous of East Asian Achievement even after AD 1860?

    Summer Palace looted, destroyed, and raped by Anglo-French force in 1860

    http://www.oxfordtoday.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/oxford/styles/ot_full_width/public/media_wysiwyg/Looting_of_the_Yuan_Ming_Yuan_by_Anglo_French_forces_in_1860.jpg?itok=CYfiDe-M

    • Replies: @Malla
  181. Why are we blaming the victims now? Does Mercer spend too much time on /pol/, or what?
    I’m not going to deny that most legitimately famous actress-women appear at times to be ‘fame-whores’, but there are many who are not.
    The entire Hollywood system is and has forever been exploitive and centralized. The same goes for the fashion and music industry. The US Government turns a blind to the system because it’s so lucrative.

    The result of it all is a lot of ruined lives (drugs, PTSD, death), shitty movies, shitty pop music, slave labor clothing+shoes, etc.

    Oh yeah, and independent film-making is now harder than ever to distribute, with indie theaters largely closed, and stream services/youtube basically making it uneconomical to even bother.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  182. @aaaa returns

    Again, exactly why all support must be withdrawn from Hollywood and the media organs. Nobody is forced to watch TV, turning it off en masse would induce far more of a seismic shift than any number of elections.

  183. Sean says:
    @renfro

    They did it all during the Weimar Republic, the most depraved society of the 20th century, when they were at the height of their control of Germany..

    Douglas Reed who was there at the time (and no friend of the Jews) said he thought that Wiemar was the epitome of depravity, until went to America in the 1950′s. Goebbels is supposed to had said that the actresses who had been sleeping with Jewish film producers would now be sleeping with him. Since ancient Greece societies have become decadent and men have behaved like pigs in shit when they could get away with it. That is what men are like.

    They went too far then. They are going too far now

    WW1 explained Hitler’s appeal, not the Jew thing. Societies organised for war are (what I think you would call) culturally healthy. War is virtually obsolete in the West. You can have what William Lind called Main Sewer America and no war or a traditional values state in which men die with their boots on.

    • Replies: @renfro
  184. Alden says:
    @Priss Factor

    I’m not familiar with that critter. Who or what is it??? See how liberal I am?? i didn’t use a sex specific * pronoun.

    I refuse to use the word gender unless I am teaching a language that uses genders for the, a, and noun endings.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  185. Alden says:
    @Wally

    I’ll print out and send that cartoon to my local jewish community newspaper.

  186. Alden says:
    @Rurik

    The child actress delivered by her Mother to mogul Rapeberg in the Godfather looked to be about 10. The theatrical occupation has always been like that. Maureen O’Hara a great beauty, actress who starred in mega milli0n hits that made a lot of money for the studios was told many times to her face that although she deserved Oscars she would never get one unless she got down on her knees.

    From ancient times, theater and entertainment was always a brothel. Elizabethan and Jacobean London was under control by Puritan aldermen, Mayors, chamber of commerce types. That is why women actors were totally banned, because they were basically prostitutes. The show was a place to display the merchandise. The men actors prostituted themselves to women and men.

    D.W Griffin was the lover of both Dorothy and Lillian Gish. That’s why they got the parts. Your local public library probably has books about the drug, rape and scandals of early Hollywood. very entertaining reading.

    Both the actors union SAG and the state of California have stringent protections for child actors BUT only when on the set. The kid must be accompanied by a teacher and a social worker chaperone (not a parent) while working. But after that, the lechers close in. Why a non parent chaperone is obvious. The parents were notorious for giving the kids to the casting directors and every one else in exchange for a good part and money.

    Shirley Temple’s parents totally protected her because they were very prosperous middle class and didn’t need any money. Maureen O’Hara came from a similar family. Elizabeth Taylor’s family was very wealthy and gentry in England.

    But the child actors from the lower middle class and poor just get chewed up. When he was making Rebel Without a Cause, director Nicholas Ray had sex with most of the teen age cast.

    They are not all like that. Many of the actors who just make a modest living are normal people with decent morals. That’s probably why they just make a modest living in the business.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  187. Alden says:
    @Malla

    German women really are beautiful, much prettier than the British, French or Italian. The Irish are just about as beautiful as the Germans. But the Poles are the ne plus ultra of European beauty.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Ivy
  188. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @DaveE

    Pussy Riot ho’s are the victims? Or maybe Miley, Madonna, and Clinton? Or you are in arms to defend Kardashians?
    Weinstein does not look better next the murderous and profiteering Clintons (both husband and wife are Weinstein’s long-term buddies) and the brainless pink pussies. They all are the same company. There is no daylight between Weinstein and the “progressive” females of the Clinton’ camp.

  189. Alden says:
    @Rosamond Vincy

    One horrified TV reporter had to watch him do a potted plant. I bet he just took Viagra the way most people take a vitamin pill every day. He probably took one 3 times a day. He has children by that Georgina Chapman. I hope there is not a daughter. Genetics decree that girls look like their fathers and boys look like their Mothers. So a girl who looks like that, poor thing.

    According to the driver he had in France for the Cannes film festival/orgy, he had one of those gastric bands put around his stomach for weight loss. But obviously it didn’t work.

  190. Alden says:
    @Rosamond Vincy

    Bacall got involved with Bogie in her very first film at age 20. So she probably, maybe was protected.
    But who knows. It was just as bad in 1905 at Edison studios in New Jersey.

    • Replies: @Rosamond Vincy
  191. Alden says:
    @Rdm

    Google Nefertiti, Botticelli and Fra Lippi and you will see that beauty has nothing to do with Hollywood propaganda.

    I watch TCM a lot mostly because it doesn’t have commercials. I’ve noticed that with the exception of Amy Adams and Nicole Kidman who is getting middle aged, most of the actresses featured in the last 25 years are very, very average looking.

    • Replies: @Rdm
    , @Truth
  192. Alden says:
    @Rosamond Vincy

    I hate to be disgusting, but have you ever been to Germany? Only a serious pervert could have designed those toilets.

  193. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden

    German women really are beautiful, much prettier than the British, French or Italian.

    You have odd tastes. Than English, perhaps; than Italian, not really; than French, perhaps– Frenchwomen are not all that pretty but they make up for it with a unique grace and vivacity. Many Poles look a lot like Germans, which explains that part of your categorization. Irishwomen vary, on average they’re goodlooking, though they age badly, as do Ukrainians who would otherwise probably take the crown, which I incline to award to Spaniards among the races of Europe.

    Other Slavs (including Poles), Caucasians, and Scotswomen are pretty as well.

    • Replies: @Rdm
    , @Authenticjazzman
  194. Alden says:
    @Rurik

    But Swinestein himself is extremely N. European or Aryan looking. I mean he weighs about 200 pds more than the average, but he doesn’t look stereotypically Jewish at all. He looks like what his ancestors were, a Polish or E German landless farm laborer.

  195. Alden says:
    @geokat62

    I’ve posted this before and I’ll post it again. More than 90 percent of attorneys on the anti White side of every school desegregation and affirmative action lawsuit have obviously Jewish names.

  196. Alden says:
    @Father O'Hara

    Madonna’s early fan base when she was in NYC were gay men. The gay men got her started. Her teen age ballet teacher was a guy who had been with ABT. So when she went to NYC she was loaded with reccommendations from her gay ballet teacher and other Michigan gays. The NYC gay dancers and other entertainment gays took her under their wing and made her a star.

    Her biggest fan base was always gay men. Don’t know who listens to her now.

  197. Alden says:
    @joe webb

    At least once every summer the Los Angeles Slimes carries a shock and horror article written by a White woman. She expresses incredibly naive shock at the sight of ASian women carrying parasols and umbrellas wearing hats and long sleeves and slathering themselves with sunscreen to avoid getting tanned.

    Horrors of horrors, Asian women are betraying the colored races or should I say races of color vy avoiding getting tanned. And the article is always, always by a White woman.

    Races of color or races of ****????

  198. Alden says:
    @Bayan

    Circumcision was around long, long before the bible and originated in sub sahara africa for both boys and girls.

  199. Alden says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    ” the women who simply said, “No.”

    They are working as school teachers and clerks and real estate agents and salescritters and various mundane jobs and tending to husbands, kids and households.

    Say no, and word spreads and your aren’t even allowed to come to a cattle call audition

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  200. Alden says:
    @Wally

    Notice the piles of stones and the stones around the man who was pushed off the rooftop. They are stoning him, something the founder of Christianity forbade 2,000 years ago.

  201. Alden says:
    @anonymous

    The standard muslim excuse for the head to tow covering and the male chaperone is that muslim men are so highly sexed (horny beasts) that they can’t control themselves at the sight of a women’s hand.

    So the women must be totally covered head to toe including gloved hands or they will sinfully entice the man and cause him to commit the sin of sex.

    What about the very primitive tribes in S America who wear almost no clothes except a little waist band thing? They don’t go around raping. And the south sea Islanders wore just little skirts. The men of those primitive tribes didn’t jump on anything that moved.

    But the muslims insist that unless a woman wears long black gloves and mid calf length boots under all the black garbage bags she is committing the dreadful sin of causing a man to think about sex.

    Western man is totally capable of thinking about sex all the time and noticing every woman he sees and not raping anyone. But muslim can’t see an uncovered woman without raping her. And that is the basis of all that covering stuff. It also saves a lot of money. Just get a couple black garbage bag ensembles for all the women in the household to wear when they leave the house and they can go around in dirty rags at home. Saves a lot of shame as well.

    • Replies: @gwynedd1
  202. Alden says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Pitt has lived with Angelina Jolie for years and they have all those kids. May I ask gentlemen, what is so enticing about Angelina? She has a decent figure if she wanted to be a fashion model, but her arms and legs are so skinny they are ugly. And that horrible, horrible face. Angelina Jolie has a very ugly face. She has fat cheeks which are ugly ugly ugly in a man or woman. And that mouth, like the last 2 hotdogs in a package. She does have pretty brown hair but clairol, o’real and the other hair dye companies have many pretty shades of brown hair.

    Ever see a movie “Original Sin” starring Angelina Jolie? Its about a Cuban guy who gets a mail order bride he has never seen but she sent him a picture. Angelina takes the place of the real bride. The Cuban guy meets her at the dock and says “you’re so much prettier than your picture” The camera shifts to ugly fat cheeked Angelina and she says ” That’s a friend. I didn’t want you to ask me to marry me because of my beauty” She wore her air scraped back in a bun. So her fat cheeks and long horse face was fully exposed.

    I laughed when ugly Angelina said she wanted to hide her beauty by sending him a picture of an ugly friend.

    So gentleman, why is Angelina so popular with men????????

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  203. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @SMK

    Ilana was not writing about all women but only about very specific women. Please, be honest in your response to her article.
    More on the same: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-22/they-called-him-pig-driver-speaks-out-about-harvey-weinsteins-disgraceful-behavior comment section)
    “But Weinsteen is HIllary’s close friend for decades and even Michelle Obama called Harvey “a wonderful man.”
    Where are their pink pussy hats?
    Were Hillary and Michelle ignoring his sexual assaults all these years? And yet the wookie and Cankles blasted Trump for some ‘locker room talk.”

  204. Alden says:
    @Lara

    You don’t know the burden of beauty and you don’t know what you’re talking about.

  205. Alden says:
    @Greg Bacon

    Remember Klute? Jane Fonda was a not so high class call girl, barely above a street walker.

  206. @Alden

    Both Florenz Ziegfeld and DW Griffith were notorious for hitting on aspiring chorus girls and actresses, although there is no record that they ever tried force. Those sufficiently talented, such as Marilyn Miller or the Gish sisters, said “No,” and still got cast.

  207. Avery says:
    @anonymous

    {Now, how about the Ho culture in all of western civilisation? }

    Is that why millions of Muslim so-called refugees are literally risking life and limb to get to one of those decadent Western civilizations ? How many ‘refugees’ have gone to find shelter in wealthy, pious, 100% Muslim, non-’Ho’ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, for example?

  208. Rdm says:
    @Alden

    Beauty is nothing to do with Hollywood propaganda. But Hollywood machine will accentuate one’s perception of beauty.

  209. Rdm says:
    @Malla

    I don’t find German women attractive, neither is Dutch women. But I find Ukranian women to be exceptionally attractive. And I highly doubt you’re an Indian.

  210. Rdm says:
    @Anon

    English are the ugliest Europeans, second to Jews.

  211. Rdm says:
    @Wally

    We can play the game forever.

    That’s why Natalie Portman plays Jackie?

  212. Ivy says:
    @Alden

    Diane Kruger as Helen of Troy was pretty hard to top for many men, even if not admissible due to Germanic origin.

  213. Truth says:
    @Alden

    That’s because they are actORS not actresses.

  214. John_Poot says:
    @Anon

    On the pussy hat wearers.
    Be reminded that the male equivalency is Cockhead.
    Seen anyone proudly representing/demonstrating that case?

    ahh – nope.

    ‘nough said.

  215. Malla says:
    @Rdm

    That was war. Immigrants to Europe are not victors of conquests.

  216. @Anon

    Germany is bursting with beautiful women, and always has been. If you trace the ancestry of ladies such a Monroe or Bacall, you will most certainly discover a profound German influence .

    Now Slovenia is a special situation such as nowhere else on earth, a paradise of stunningly gorgeous females and the most beautiful lady and love of my life was Slovenien, ( she was living in Germany) .

    Anyway back in the summer of 1973, I made a trip there, to Slovenia, in my new Alfa Romeo GTV, with a buddy, and sitting in an outdoor cafe’ after driving all night I said quote “Tony do you see what I see” to which he replied “Yeah I see it”, and what did we view : The town square brimming with strikingly beautiful girls strolling around, window shopping, whatever, and here are these two American tourists breathless and and agape at the apparition of such a collection of female beauty in a condensed location.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified forty years-plus, airborne trained U S army vet, and pro jazz artist.

  217. Rurik says:
    @renfro

    They did it all during the Weimar Republic, the most depraved society of the 20th century..

    They went too far then. They are going too far now.

    the parallels are eerie to say the least

    what are the chances that if American Gentiles notice that Jews are overrepresented in positions of power, and that many of them use that power to perpetrate harm or take liberties with the powerless….

    that those Gentiles will be called “Nazis” by those very same powerful Jews?

    We supplied the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter and administered to its religious beliefs in the manner we considered suitable. We ridiculed the highest ideals of the German nation and profaned the matters which it holds sacred. ”
    — Dr Manfred Reifer, in the German Jewish magazine Czernowitzer Allegemeine Zeitung, September 1933

    it bothers me when I see ‘atheists’ getting blamed for banning Christmas

    atheists are no more responsible for banning Christmas than Ted Kennedy was for enacting the 1965 immigration ‘reform’, that doomed white America.

    They use dupes, but their hidden hand simply isn’t hidden anymore.

    September 1933, Adolf Hitler removed every single Jew from positions of influence in the mass media: from the fields of literature, art, music, journalism, the cinema, and popular entertainment in general

    there is a nascent conversation going on about the imprudence of having too many Jews in the State and Defense Departments, due to possible loyalty concerns vis-a-vis Israel.

    But if anyone notices that it’s duel-national, Israeli citizens (John Bolton, et al) advocating for war on all Israel’s neighbors, then that person will be called anti-Semitic

    WWII was an unspeakable horror

    something Europe and Russia are still reeling from

    that we’re all being forced into another global conflict with Israel at its center, shows how intractable and pernicious this particular problem is.

    And as far as I’m concerned, all we have to do is end the Federal Reserve Bank, which I don’t have to tell Unz readers is a privately owned institution intended and used to enslave humanity and create hell on earth. Which is what those World Wars did, created hell on earth. To the cheers of the Zionist banksters who foisted it all, and are tying to do it again.

    anyways, if we don’t all want to read about depraved and powerful men treating our culture like it’s their toilet, then we have to End the Fed !

  218. Rurik says:
    @Rosamond Vincy

    a black-and-white houndstooth suit like the one Bacall wears in the scene where she’s sitting on Bogart’s desk, scratching her knee and passing the phone back and forth. Whoa….

    since Mr. Unz has tweaked the software and made it easier to post photos, I have to resist the temptation to overuse this nice feature, but occasionally… there’s just no better way to convey something than with an actual picture

    smoldering

    the famous cut from Rhett carrying Scarlett up the stairs to the shot of her singing and smirking in bed

    scandalous!

    It wasn’t until I was a little older that I understood just how well done that was. The whole dynamic was so over and understated at the same time, that it was movie making at its best.

    Without a subtext, it’s not acting, just reciting, and that’s why so much that H’wood churns out is so boring.

    the stuff they put out today is egregious

    and I sometimes wonder, if there isn’t sort of a lost balance between the talented Jews and Gentiles in the business. Sort of like the music industry in the seventies, when the Jews were more or less promoting the Gentiles and acting as managers and such. Until in the 80s it became more controlled and more crass, and then the nineties when the powerful Jewish moguls began promoting Hip-hop and ((Sumner Redstone’s)) MTV began churning out cultural and spiritual rot – mainlined by middle America and urban youth until today they’re lost. Shooting each other in Chicago and LA and Detroit to prove their thug-cred, and getting STDs in the heartland as if being the biggest slut in town is a badge of honor.

    such a terrible, pointless loss of their happiness and hope, all down the sewer drain

    any why?!

    why did they have to destroy the music industry?

    why did they have to destroy the movie industry?

    why must they run everything down?

    Is it because they just can’t stop hating everything and everyone?

    what happened to producers like David Selznick and directors like Stanley Kubrick?

    where did all the talent go?

    down the ‘hate’ drain?

    just too much hate and rancor in their souls to be creative anymore?

    • Agree: renfro
    • Replies: @Rosamond Vincy
    , @Truth
  219. Rurik says:
    @Alden

    The parents were notorious for giving the kids to the casting directors and every one else in exchange for a good part and money.

    Western civilization needs a new spirituality.

    Christianity is too top down, and therefor vulnerable to corruption, as we see today with the Vatican and the evangelicals all slurping shekels from the devil’s $lop trough and ordering their flocks to accept homosexual marriage and massive immigration of Muslims and everyone else into the dying (murdered) former Christendom.

    Do they think millions of Muslims flooding into Europe are going to fill the pews of the empty cathedrals?

    No, they don’t. They’re simply counting their shekels as the Western world descends into homomania and cultural, spiritual rot. If the Pope were promoting spiritual health and traditional values, and repudiating the Zio-liberalism that is destroying young people’s lives all over the dying (murdered) West, then I too would be singing his praises. But he’s not. He’s doing the opposite, obviou$ly in the thrall of the Fiend.

    They are not all like that. Many of the actors who just make a modest living are normal people with decent morals. That’s probably why they just make a modest living in the business.

    who are they?

    off the top of my head, I can’t think of any actors in Hollywood that haven’t’ made a deal with the devil for their careers. Where are the anti-war celebrity voices? Where are the celebrities talking about 9/11, or Palestine, or actresses campaigning for young women to value self-respect?

    It seems to me like they’re all whores and shills, selling out to the regime and howling at president Trump for not demonizing the voters who put him into office.

    I can’t think of one Hollywood actress or actor today who has said anything of value in years.

    Ed Asner and Charlie Sheen are the only ones I can think of with the integrity to use their voice for anything other than empty preening. As our nation destroys country after country based on known and obvious lies.

    And war criminals and mass-murderers like Obama and Hillary are treated like great statesmen by these vapid, insipid embarrassments to the thespian craft.

    IMHO

    • Replies: @geokat62
  220. @Rurik

    I don’t know what happened, but “The Song of Bernadette,” an example of the kind of collaboration you describe, would be impossible now.

  221. @Father O'Hara

    (Quietly pukes)

    I’d rather play Doll Tearsheet in a church basement production of Henry IV part 2.

  222. Liberalism is imploding because power corrupts. For at least 4 decades since the 1970s liberals have completely taken control of all the most important institutions in the US, from the media to academia, Wall Street to Hollywood, Washington DC to Silicon Valley, the entire judiciary system. They have had to answer to no one for 4 decades, and they have become lazy, cocky, brain dead, and utterly, completely, morally bankrupt.

    Libtards have been brainwashing us for at least 4 decades that everything depends on feelings. You must be a slave to your feelings, feelings justify everything, from adultery to promiscuity to homosexuality, drugs, unconscionable greed, lust, alcoholism, even crime. Liberals are responsible for the downfall of western civilization and who is at the forefront of this liberal movement but Jews. Jews have a direct hand in the downward spiral of western civilization. They are drunk with power, and power corrupts.

    Through their control of the judiciary branch liberals are now outright seizing power from the Executive and Legislative branch, and any citizens’ initiative. Our judges are no longer interpreting the law, they are now interpreting and imposing on us their personal feelings. A judge in Seattle recently struck down a citizens’ initiative to ban “Safe” Injection Sites in Western Washington, ruling it a hazard to “public health”, completely ignoring the fact that heroine remains illegal in the state and the country. Judges are now directly appropriating tax dollars to support illegal activities.

    Liberalism is rotten from the core. Hollywood is just a manifestation of that rotten core. The survival of the western world depends on our ability to rid ourselves of this rot, and it must start from education. We need to take power away from our colleges and K-12 schools to brainwash our kids. The internet is a major force of change because it allows alternative news sources to take power from traditional media. Hollywood is imploding like dominoes. Now we need to attack education. Homeschooling and professional certification, perhaps through MOOCs, should be further developed to weaken the liberal institutions at their core.

  223. @c matt

    Seems to me the only ones with a claim are the ones who paid the price and didn’t get the part.

    Actually the real victims are the ones who refused to pay the price and didn’t get the part.

  224. @Wally

    Thank you. That explains why Jews are such traitors. They are over compensating for past grievances. Blaming everything on anti-semitism means they have no need for any self-introspection, and indeed most Jews are simply incapable of it, just like blacks whom they’ve convinced to be perpetual victims like themselves. Not acknowledging the parts they played that led to all the past animosity against Jews means they will continue with the same mischieves and continue to be hated throughout the western world, especially now that they are drunk with power.

  225. @Rurik

    Indeed the depravity of the left knows no bounds. From Sex and the City to Entourage, Six Feet Under, Sopranos, Rome and all other shows I no longer can even stomach, HBO shows are the utter pit of the liberal soul. Other cable networks are not far behind, Californication by Showtime and Mad Men by AMC are equally sick, twisted and depraved.

  226. @peterike

    Disney has been on a downward spiral since Michael Eisner the Jew took over from Robert Miller, the son-in-law of Walt Disney in 1984. Since Eisner’s reign Disney of all media companies has had the most direct hand in the downward spiral and coarsening of American pop culture. All Disney movies began to portray bimbo cheerleaders and dumb jocks as the popular kids and smart kids as the nerds to be picked on and laughed at. Coarse rap music was not considered mainstream until Disney and then rest of Hollywood began to embrace it.

    The current CEO Bob Iger, another Jew, took over from Eisner in 2005 and took the rot one step further. Disney is now the #1 manufacturer of teenage ho’s and skanks from Britney Spears to Miley Cyrus to Justine Bieber. ESPN has gone from a sports channel to a liberal propaganda sports theme fake news channel. ESPN’s big money corrupted college sports and professional sports alike.

    Walt Disney started a great company. Then the Jews took over and do what Jews do, run it to the ground.

  227. @Art

    Corey Feldman just got arrested for tweeting that he “has a plan to expose the pedophiles of Hollywood”. The Jews are running scared in Hollywood, and their powerful friends in the LAPD, FBI, CIA, Capitol Hill and the presstitude are coming in for the rescue.

  228. @Anon-og

    Good article. Thank you for sharing. I agree with Kevin MacDonald that the pro-immigration stance for Jews is an ethnic thing, rather than ideological, which explains why both neocons and libtards alike want more immigration. Both groups are dominated by Jews. The more nonwhite immigrants we get, the more diluted WASP powers will be and the longer Jews can stay on top. Divide and conquer.

    This article by Illana Mercer rubs me the wrong way as it basically justifies Sweinstein’s behavior which IMO is wholly indefensible.

    • Replies: @renfro
  229. geokat62 says:
    @Rurik

    who are they?

    Good question, Rurik.

    While I seem to recall a handful of actors that actually had the courage to speak out against the assault on Gaza in 2014, I think only one actually stood up to the inevitable Zionist onslaught.

    Both Penelope Cruz and Javiar Bardem had initially written a defiant open letter in the Spanish press condemning the disprortionate response to the rockets “raining down” on Israel, but after enduring an onslaught of criticism (accused of being antisemites), they chose to “clarify” their position.

    Not so, Russell Brand. This guy put his career on the line by taking on Sean Hannity while still in the prime of his life.

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/world/meast/russell-brand-sean-hannity-israel-hamas/index.html

    I can’t think of one Hollywood actress or actor today who has said anything of value in years.

    Can’t get more meaningful than this:

    In June 2014, [Russell Brand] took part in the People’s Assembly Against Austerity, that attracted an estimated 50,000 people marching from the BBC office to Westminster. Brand addressed the crowd, saying, “The people of this building [the House of Commons] generally speaking do not represent us, they represent their friends in big business. It’s time for us to take back our power. Power isn’t there, it is here, within us. The revolution that’s required isn’t a revolution of radical ideas, but the implementation of ideas we already have.”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Brand

  230. @Anon

    Hold your horses. Bill Clinton is Jewish?

    He was the first Jewish black president. George W. Bush the second. Obama the third. Trump the 4th, though more Jewish than black. Jews haven’t left the White House since Clinton was elected.

    • Replies: @Anon
  231. @Malla

    The governments of the West are themselves are the greatest enemy of the people of the West and want to destroy the people of West. And Muslims are one of the weapons used. Other weapons include SJWs, femnazis and libtards.

    You forgot blacks. They are a very useful block. Highly tribal, always angry and volatile, lazy and not too bright, easily manipulated. Jewish men are too effiminate, they need the blacks to be their muscles.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  232. @Malla

    And this hatred of the brown blacks is directed the most at Nordic looking Whites, the ones with light hair and/or light eyes.

    Takes two to tango. Nordic looking whites are biggest cucks around these days, just look at the Swedes. Swedish women are rushing to embrace and marry blacks and muslims, while their men are too busy getting drunk or being gay/transgender. It’s like every Swede be it man or woman dreams of having a black/Muslim boyfriend.

  233. @Anon-og

    In my opinion, the big twin evils in the Middle East are Zionism(Israel) and Wahhabism(Saudi Arabia), their agendas are so identical that it looks like they serve the same masters. And Muslims from Yemen to Syria to Libya to Iraq to Palestine have literally had their nations destroyed by Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Western War machine

    Spot on. The Sunnis and Shiites are fighting for supremacy in the Muslim world, and the Sunnis are now aligned with the Jews to destroy the Shiites (Iran-Yemen-Bahrain-Syria). The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Even Breitbart is a Zionist rag, a propaganda tool for Israel. Try criticizing Israel or Jews on that website and you are instantly kicked to the curb and banned. The interesting thing now is Qatar and Turkey are beginning to breakaway from the unholy Saudi-Israel alliance and pivoting towards Syria and Russia.

    It speaks volume that Trump’s first trip abroad is to Israel and Saudi Arabia, he knows who America’s daddy is, even if most of his supporters are still in the dark.

  234. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    A progressive presstitute: “The Bloviations of Christiane Amanpour, Queen of Fake News:” https://off-guardian.org/2017/09/14/the-bloviations-of-christiane-amanpour-queen-of-fake-news/

  235. @gp

    I have long thought Bollywood dancing is extremely vulgar and getting worse, reminds me of blacks dancing. If you want to know if Indians and Africans are close kins, just look at the way they dance.

    • Replies: @Anon
  236. @renfro

    They are now teaching this crap to high schoolers in WA state, in a sex ed curriculum mandated by the state. All high school kids must now be taught gay sex, transgender sex and encourage to explore their true self. Sick psychos have taken over our education system.

    Liberals have completely gone off the deep end, and they are dragging our kids down with them.

  237. @Father O'Hara

    Women are trashy by nature.

    That’s harsh. It’s like saying all men are sleazy lowlifes by nature. Women are more social and therefore more susceptible to peer pressure than men, especially young women. Our society is still a lot more accepting of loner males than loner females, starting in grade school. A lot of young women just go along with what their peers are doing because they fear being seen alone — watching MTV, listening to Madonna, dressing and dancing in suggestive ways, getting drunk, allowing themselves to be picked up at bars. It’s usually all to conform to peer pressure so they stay as the in-group. The smart ones eventually grow up and grow out of it as they get older and have children, and try to prevent their daughters from falling into the same trap. The dumb ones try to live vicariously through their daughters, who repeat the same mistakes.

  238. @Alden

    I think this is highly speculative. I think there’ more hay here than substance. The willingness of women to have liason’s with men is not something new or startling, and even less so if the man is a power broker.

    There’s no indication of coercion. There is no evidence of rape or assault. In my view, what there is are women who aw Executive Weinstein as an easy mark for complaint. I am not condoning relations outside of marriage. I am not in support of anything of that nature, however, I have been alive long enough to know, and experience life for what it is while pressing for something better.

    Anyone working in education, healthcare, the corporate world and what you have are people, working together and people working together of the opposite sex (gender) is bound to have all manner of sexual intrigue. I am not going to get caught up in the nonsense that is Hollywood politics making room for another female executive.

    I am not sue it bode well for the state of feminist and female independence, — all this me too action. In a wold in which men are supposed to pursue a woman to his humiliation, excuse me while I yawn.

    While I chagrin Hollywood’s politics, I don’t buy into an argument that classifies them as the names referenced in the article. While on the surface the article make sense — I am not sure it is an honest accurate assessment. What’s dangerous about Hollywood is there policy advocacy and what they put on the scree — revelation about their humanness are interesting but won’t do much to hinder their agendas.

    Hollywood is a world of insecurity fear, competition, keeping one’s head down, gossip, ego, prestige and most of all ego stroking and money. I suspect that in the environment that our insatiable appetites feed for celebrity as affirmation — there are plenty of decent human beings. That their foibles are display more than our own may be cause for compassion more than derision.

    It’s their politics that I will tear into.

    I must reject bedding with Hollywood women as with any other women not my spouse, but there are no small few, that I might enjoy an evening dinner or moonlight stroll with.

  239. @Father O'Hara

    LOL is that an actual movie plot or did you make all that stuff up? Sounds like a real Oscar contender y’all, something every drug and alcohol fueled script writer of Hollywood dreamed of spewing out.

  240. @Rdm

    Which race invented free speech?
    Freedom of speech belongs to everyone. The notion becomes specious if it’s free speech or hate speech. You can say you don’t like Obama. It’s free speech. However, if you bring up your personal preference as in Obama’s black skin, his ancestry, his nose, all of those makes you hate him on personal ground, it’s becomes dubious if you’re employing free speech or hate speech.
    You want to claim it’s White race.

    Free speech means free speech, you can call Obama a low IQ niggah and it’s still free speech. The trouble with calling something “hate speech” is it’s very subjective. One man’s free speech is another’s hate speech. The true definition of hate speech has become: “speech that I hate”, and most of the hate these days come from the left, towards those who don’t buy into their dogma.

    That said, freedom comes with responsibility. Free speech comes with its own consequences. You are free to say what you say, but you also have to accept the consequence that there will be those out there disagreeing with you and think you are a racist and what not.

    But in the world of free speech, there is no such thing as hate speech. A speech is just that, a speech. The hate is how you interpret it, how you perceived it was meant. Others might interpret it differently and don’t see the hate at all. That’s why there is no such thing as a hate speech.

    • Replies: @Rdm
  241. @Alden

    I can only speak for myself.

    That combination of intelligence, strength, assertiveness and vulnerability that mingle and interplay one with the other almost seamlessly encompassed in both subtle and unsubtle nonverbals. Add that to her physicality —— ohhh well.

    While I chagrin the politics of she proffers, I would hope that she and her husband remain married for another twenty plus year.

    There are some very talented women in Hollywood — their politics aside.

  242. Truth says:
    @Rurik

    Skinny teen boy. Sorry.

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
  243. renfro says:
    @Another Realist

    ”I agree with Kevin MacDonald that the pro-immigration stance for Jews is an ethnic thing, rather than ideological, which explains why both neocons and libtards alike want more immigration. Both groups are dominated by Jews. The more nonwhite immigrants we get, the more diluted WASP powers will be and the longer Jews can stay on top. Divide and conquer”’>>>>>

    I haven’t read McDonald but he probably traced it as others have done by going back to the very first origins of what we now call diversity, the seed of which was “Pularism’…..somewhat like ‘multiculutism’ first advanced by Jewish immigrant Horace Kallen, called the father of Pularism, and the start of so called jewish intellectuals.
    Kallen was the first Jew to ever teach in a American university in the early 1900s.

    Here’s a little bio on him. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace_Kallen

    To put it in a nutshell Kallen was against the “melting pot’ concept of America (where people assimilated) because he feared mainly Jews losing their own ethnic jewishness and disappearing into Americanism.
    So he and other Jewish activist promoted the idea of ‘ethnic’ diversity, presenting it in the typical pilpul way of Jews as a idealic wonderland of all kinds of people retaining their own particular inteest based on their ethnic identity .

    Some American critics pointed out to Kallen, who was a staunch Zionist for a ‘strictly Jewish State’, that he was the ultimate hypocrite.

    Of course the actual goal was to dismantle the “European-American’ ruling class so there would be no ‘unified power elite’ (the anglo saxon Protestants or WASP, the historical enemy of the Jews). American would be a nation of ethnics all ‘politically’ putting forth their own particular ethnic interest with the goverment “managing” the various groups interest. Iow the gov would mediate the ‘compromising’ between all the competing ethnic groups. Instead of establishing any “national’ interest to apply to all groups.

    Then we had the huge immigration waves of 1890 to 1920 of 23 million new immigrants with the early ones coming from northern and western Europe and the later ones coming from southern and eastern Europe. This was the great surge of 2 million Jews from Eastern Europe doubling their population in the US.
    This immigration plus the later Jewish problem (holocaust) of WWII added numbers of Jews and force to the Pularism push for the US
    By the 1960′s it was throughly entrenched in academia and think tanks and therefore in the liberal wing of politics.

    And this is why we are in the mess we are in today with every ethnic group jockying to control the country for their own ethnic interest.
    And why the ethnic minorities use the racist or anti semite slur as a political tool against your traditional white Americans.
    And why even non citizens like illegal immigrants will talk about and demand their ‘rights’ even though as non citizens they have no political ‘rights’ in the US.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  244. Rdm says:
    @Another Realist

    I have never met you in public, I have never interacted with your family, but if I’d say

    “Your mom is a *hore. Her c*-t stinks.”

    Do you consider if it’s a free speech or hate speech?

    PS. I have to repost with those asterisks because my previous unfiltered one was presumably considered “not free”.

  245. @Truth

    And yet we grow more like them every year, who is it that is disseminating nigger culture to whites.Jews

    • Replies: @Truth
  246. Truth says:
    @Colleen Pater

    You haven’t changed much in the 50 years I’ve been around.

    • Replies: @Talha
  247. renfro says:
    @Sean

    ” Douglas Reed who was there at the time (and no friend of the Jews) said he thought that Wiemar was the epitome of depravity, until went to America in the 1950′s”>>>>

    Do you have a link for that Douglas statement?
    I am very familiar with Reed and have a hard time believing he was referring to 1950′s US Disney World and Father Knows Best ‘society’ as being depraved.
    Reed’s criticisms of America had to do with Zionism taking over the US …which he lamented and he in fact bemoaned that naïve Americans were being used by the Zionist.

    ” WW1 explained Hitler’s appeal, not the Jew thing.”>>>>

    You are going beyond my comment….you are enlarging it…I was speaking specifically of the deleterious Social Effect of Jewish entertainment and media dominance on German ‘society’.
    Not that Germans responded to Hitler ‘because of that’…although they did welcome of his cleaning out the gutters so to speak.

    • Replies: @Sean
  248. Talha says:
    @Truth

    LOL!

    “I can’t stand these Niggers blaming everyone else for their own problems – when are they going to take responsibility??!!”

    Followed by…

    “It’s these Niggers and Jews that are ruining our kids!”

    The cognitive dissonance – enough to fry an egg on!

    Peace.

    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  249. @Talha

    I am not sure that peace is attainable given the dissonance you cite.

  250. Roscoe says:

    Excellent commentary. Thanks!

  251. Sean says:
    @renfro

    Far And Wide, it was about 50′s Chicago. Reed lamented the direction America went since before the Civil War which was NOT the work of Jews but rather an indigenous Culture of Critique that the (Mac) Donald wrote about.

    Germany was far from a defeated country after WW1, they had not drawn on all their resources; another run at breaking out of the encirclement by Western powers and Russia was quite in order. It started long before Hitler The financial centralisation that Wiemar undertook made Germany far more formidable (Brendan Simms ), and created the basis for Blitzkrieg (there were also secret deals with the Soviets to develop military technology-especially tanks. Wiemar pre-mobilised Germany for total war, then Hitler arrived with the ideology. It was Germany reacting in a predictable way. There wasn’t that much cleaning out of gutters to do, Germany was still quite a rural country when Hitler took power.

    I happen to believe that people choose an ideology or morality congruent with what realism dictates they must do . In other words, you could expect Germany gearing up for the second part of a great war of two halves to get very very tough. The early Bronze age Aryans who exterminated the indigenous population of north Europe had a rape and murder wolf cult, Germany had Nazism (Hitler’s first name means proud wolf, which he was well pleased with. He referred to the SS as “my pack of wolves”).

    The Kardashians net worth is still only half of the relatively wholesome Olsen twins’. Behaving like a ho is not the preferred strategy, unless like REAL pro you get the money or movie part before putting out .

  252. renfro says:

    October 24, 2017 at 7:45 pm GMT • 300 Words
    @renfro
    Far And Wide, it was about 50′s Chicago. Reed lamented the direction America went since before the Civil War which was NOT the work of Jews but rather an indigenous Culture of Critique that the (Mac) Donald >>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Sorry but you are literally full of shit.

    First — you reply with some nonsense about Hitler’s reasons for ‘ going to war’ not being about the Jews which had nothing to do with my comment on the ‘social’ depravity of Weimar Germany.

    Second –you make up a statement in which you claim Douglas Reed said that US 1950s were an ‘American Sewer’ worse then Weimar Germany.

    Third –when asked to provide proof of that you say he wrote it in “Far and Wide” and referred me to an article by McDonald that again had nothing to do with what you claimed about Douglas.

    Fourth–here is the entire text of ‘Far and Wide’ https://archive.org/details/FarAndWide
    It is Not in there. So unless you can dig up a link to what you claim from some where else you are just lying or repeating a lie you were told.

    Fifth–in ‘Far and Wide’ Reed writes over and over again about the slimy zionist that have taken root in America. He calls NY a Jew City. And Chicago a Jewish Mafia city.

    Sixth – McDonlds article was about Puritians influence in America. Reed wasnt mentioned nor was Sewer America

    Seventh – you keep repeating that nothing had anything to do with the Jews. I think you protest a bit too much.

    Don’t come creeping around with me with this crap and waste my time.

    • Replies: @Sean
  253. @Alden

    That is Heer Jeet, the vile Person of Dot at Goo Republic.

  254. Malla says:
    @Another Realist

    Black have been used by the tribe since the time of ancient Egypt. It is the same program being run again and again.

    • Replies: @gwynedd1
    , @Truth
  255. gwynedd1 says:
    @Alden

    What is most annoying about this fact is that one can make a virtually neutral observation that a society may carry on this way, to cover a woman from head to toe. However to mix such a culture with others is obviously going to cause a problem.

  256. gwynedd1 says:
    @Malla

    Semites and Saharan Africans have certainly had a relationship for far longer. They also seem to know how to reign them in. Semitic people did not have this uppity democratic thing going on where these subjugated peoples would inherit political power. They also double castrated to make sure their slave stock would not breed. They did not seem to have much of a weakness for sub Saharan women either. The weakness of the Semites is their love of subjugated women to the north. From the Umayyad to the Abbasid it went from Arab to Eurasian half breeds. The Hebrew script is full of the corrupting influence of subjugated women. Jews followed the same path.

    The “white races” , and we may include to some degree Iranians , invaded the Arabs and then the Turks quite passively. As I said, Jews are also following this pattern. They keep turning more European. That little meme of the hook nosed Jew taking the blond German girl into his clutches looks to be a sign of male conquest, but the next generation would hardly know the difference. The offspring are half German. Israeli models do not look particular Semitic to me. And when one considers the genes expressed are recessive, it lingers and appears in unexpected places.

    So it looks to me that the Arabs were well practiced in using Africans at arms reach while people to the north are their Achilles heel. Meanwhile the Achilles heel of the North seems to be Africans . The efficiency of the European social order is wrecked by a more tribalistic people that can only be held together with authoritarianism. Large institutions in the service of a large population just does not work with extended family and tribalism as a rule. Yet Europeans just cannot help themselves and grant them political fraternity. The Europeans bred their slaves , which I am sure had a powerful effect of ruining the illusion that slaves were sub human. It was much easier to maintain that illusion with a grown slave directly from Africa speaking some African dialect. Again, the Arabs never let this happen.

    • Replies: @Malla
  257. Sean says:
    @renfro

    Reed said it somewhere, obviously after visiting America around 1950 I have read a lot of his stuff, in all probability more than you, (unless you have been to the British Newspaper library in Colindale. You asked me, for the ref and I don’t see where you spent any time on it, when it comes to taking up readers’ time with OT comments on this post, you are guiltier than me. The American transcendentalists were before Kallen. MacDonald also wrote about some WASP I think he was a hunchback, (name anyone) who was before Kallen. with similar ideas.

    Weinstein was like Germany (twice, once with Jews on their side), neither let morality get in their way and that became obvious when they had the power. So ideas don’t have consequences, power does. And the Hollywood hos are using their sexual power.

  258. Malla says:
    @gwynedd1

    Thanks for your great post. I agree with you completely. I am a brown guy but even I believe that Europeans cannot live with other races because with the exception of maybe the Japanese and some others, all non White races are exploitive and survivalist and they always end up with the tragedy of the commons as they all exploit each other. Anyways Arabs/Semites and brown peoples in general tend to posses behavioural traits, looks and IQ in between blacks and Whites/East Asians. You can say browns are blacks with high IQ with more self control and with a ability to think long term with with diluted aggressive, exploitive and tribalist tendencies common in pure blacks.

    What I was referring to anyways was that there is this theory floating around which I believe to be very very probable that the hyskos who were in Egypt were the ancestors of the Jews. And it is possible they used the black Nubians to the south as racial weapons against the Egyptians.

    There is also this theory, very probable that Islam started as a Jewish project to incite Arab tribes in Arabia to attack Persia and Byzantine. However the movement went out of their hands and the Arabs turned on them but they probably planted Marranos inside the movement to achieve the aims anyways. Since Jews played such a prominent place in the trans Atlantic slave trade, was it one of their long term goals to get blacks in the new world was to have a race which could be used to pressurise the European populations of North America. I sometimes wonder.

    • Replies: @Talha
  259. Talha says:
    @Malla

    Hey Malla,

    There is also this theory, very probable that Islam started as a Jewish project to incite Arab tribes in Arabia to attack Persia and Byzantine.

    This was basically a spin-off from “Hagarism” – a theory that was proposed by the late Patricia Crone and, I believe, Michael Cook. Nobody takes it seriously in academic circles. Even Robert Hoyland, who was an understudy of Ms. Crone and wrote one of the most comprehensive translations of the earliest non-Muslim manuscripts on the subject (https://www.amazon.com/Seeing-Islam-Others-Saw-Zoroastrian/dp/0878501258) said it had no legs to stand on:
    “…non-Muslim sources cannot provide a complete and coherent account of the history of Early Islam, even less can it support an alternative version of its development…”

    You can find all this in the paper by Prof. Holmberg (http://www.ctr.lu.se/en/person/BoHolmberg) who wrote a fairly succinct summary and refutation of the theory – skip to the end if you want to see his concluding remarks including citation of Prof. Hoyland:

    https://journal.fi/store/article/view/41583/10676

    Revisionist history is fun, for sure, but it needs serious facts to back it up before it can move from fiction into something worthy of attention.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Malla
  260. Ron Unz says:
    @Talha

    Hi Tahla,

    I happened to notice your comment here, and since you’re quite knowledgeable and am currently answering questions about Islam, I had a couple of my own…

    First, the impression I’ve always had is that Muhammad may have originally regarded himself as basically being the “Jewish messiah” and fulfilling the various prophecies that a “redeemer” would appear to reestablish the Kingdom of David and that sort of thing. but although he made a considerable effort, he failed to persuade most of the Jews that this was indeed the case, after which the two religions split. In fact, he originally direct Muslims to pray towards Jerusalem before eventually switching to Mecca? Thus, in many respects, Islam sprang directly from Old Testament Judaism rather than from (Hellenized) Christianity, which is why the doctrines and practices are so similar in many ways.

    I have no idea whether this is part of the orthodox religious history, extremely unorthodox, or one of those things that different scholars dispute, but perhaps you can answer this question.

    My other question is a very trivial one. Back a few decades ago, all the English texts used “Mohammed” and “Moslem” but then they suddenly switched to “Muhammed” and “Muslim.” Presumably, these are just different standards for transcribing Arabic into English, but do you have any idea why the change occurred? Roughly around the same time, “Peking” became “Beijing” and so forth, but that was because the PRC government officially adopted the Pinyin transliteration instead of Wade-Giles. Was there some official Arabic body that similarly changed their standard?

    • Replies: @Talha
  261. geokat62 says:
    @renfro

    To put it in a nutshell Kallen was against the “melting pot’ concept of America (where people assimilated) because he feared mainly Jews losing their own ethnic jewishness and disappearing into Americanism.
    So he and other Jewish activist promoted the idea of ‘ethnic’ diversity, presenting it in the typical pilpul way of Jews as a idealic wonderland of all kinds of people retaining their own particular inteest based on their ethnic identity .

    Some American critics pointed out to Kallen, who was a staunch Zionist for a ‘strictly Jewish State’, that he was the ultimate hypocrite.

    I was familiar with key Jewish figures of the Frankfurt School, but I’d never heard of Kallen.

    That said, I did a little digging and I came across a paper, Horace M. Kallen and the “Americanization” of Zionism, In Memoriam, written by Sarah Schmidt, who taught American Jewish Studies at the University of Maryland.

    Here’s an excerpt:

    Zionism, the movement to renationalize the Jewish people with its own cultural base, became for Kallen the secular Hebraic ideal through which he could remain within the Jewish community, his way to affirm the past he had nearly discarded by giving it a new definition. The “Jewish idea,” as it had come to him from his father, had seemed the antithesis of the freedom and democracy implicit in the “American Idea.” Through the Zionist movement, however, the Jews would be able to create a state in the Middle East dedicated to the same ideals of equality that underlay the Declaration of Independence; Zionism would actualize the possibility of extending the Jeffersonian American vision of a free society with the promise of “liberty and justice for all.” To be a good American, therefore, implied support of the Zionist aims. Especially, argued Kallen, should this be true for American Jews—with their special attachment to the values expressed in the Hebrew Bible.

    Kallen’s decision to become a Zionist, however, was not an easy one to make in the American cultural climate of seventy years ago. The demand then was for “Americanization,” the renunciation by new immigrants of their own cultural traditions in favor of the values of the great American “melting pot.’ Teachers, social workers, church spokesmen (including most Reform rabbis), the media, all aimed for an assimilation to conform with the white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant norms of the original settlers of this country. No less a figure than President Theodore Roosevelt spoke out against “hyphenated Americans” whose dual loyalties prevented them from being completely patriotic.

    Kallen was able to solve this dilemma by referring to the philosophy of another of his teachers, William James. James had refused to accept the proposition that the many are appearance and only the one is reality; this was a “plural” world, he taught, and different versions of it could all be true. This concept of the ‘reality of manyness” was just what Kallen needed to release him from the attitude that he had to shut out his past in order to accept the present. Instead, Kallen came to see his Jewish roots as a “present, perduring reality” which would join with his other, newer, experiences to form a non-alienated, more whole identity.

    http://americanjewisharchives.org/publications/journal/PDF/1976_28_01_00_schmidt.pdf

    • Replies: @renfro
  262. Talha says:
    @Ron Unz

    Hello Mr. Unz,

    Muhammad may have originally regarded himself as basically being the “Jewish messiah” and fulfilling the various prophecies that a “redeemer” would appear to reestablish the Kingdom of David and that sort of thing.

    I can certainly see where people get this impression. The issue here is that there is simply no record of contact with Jews at the beginning of his mission. For the first decade (plus) he is preaching in Makkah and laying down initial theological premises (God, Day of Judgement, Afterlife, etc.) – there are barely any legalities to speak of (even prayer and fasting is in a proto-state, Muslims still drink alcohol, etc.). The doctrine basically states that he is in the line of prior divinely guided emissaries that were sent all over the world* (the Jews simply happen to have a very specific and important line). He being from the Ishmaelite branch of the family of Abraham (pbuh) and answer to his prayer. The message is very clear from the beginning that this is for all of humanity.

    What is interesting is that he actually does not claim the role of the “Messiah”, rather he clearly preserves that role and even title for the Son of Mary (pbuh); basically, he (Jesus [pbuh]) was sent by God and most of his Jewish contemporaries missed the boat. In orthodox Muslim belief, the Son of Mary (pbuh) is the one who will eventually return to help establish the global and terrestrial “kingdom of God” (which will also eventually collapse). There is a burial spot reserved for him besides the Prophet (pbuh) in Madinah to this day.

    but although he made a considerable effort, he failed to persuade most of the Jews that this was indeed the case

    Jews come into the picture (quite prominently) once he escapes to Madinah. There he is quite optimistic and eager to have the Jews believe in his message (since he is now dealing with monotheists who already have scripture rather than random pagans), but it is fairly obvious within a short time that it is not going to happen. The Jewish community splits two ways; some accept him and many reject him. Interestingly, within those that reject him are ones who actually believe he is a prophet, but sent only to the Arabs.

    after which the two religions split

    His message actually made a very clear claim that this was not anything new; this is core to its claims of legitimacy. That it was simply the return to religion primordial (that of the Hanifs [transcendental monotheists]) which actually predates Judaism (like the belief of men like Abraham and Noah [pbut]).

    In fact, he originally direct Muslims to pray towards Jerusalem before eventually switching to Mecca?

    This is correct, even while in Makkah he used to pray toward Jerusalem (he would put the Kabah in between himself and Jerusalem such that he was facing both). When in Madinah, that was no longer possible and the Muslims actually had to turn their back towards the Kabah until the change of direction you mention. The change in direction was actually very deliberately done to break with being confused with either Judaism or Christianity and hearken back to the pre-Judaic time since the claim is that the Kabah is an ancient house of worship established by Abraham (pbuh) on the foundations of the first house of worship built by mankind, Jerusalem houses the second. Thus, to us, the turning toward this first house is quite natural for a religion that makes a claim to universal and primordial origins.

    Islam sprang directly from Old Testament Judaism rather than from (Hellenized) Christianity, which is why the doctrines and practices are so similar in many ways

    Again, the claim is that it predates both, but this is a rational conclusion even if there is not a lot of hard evidence to support it. If I didn’t believe in its veracity I would either consider it to be a Jewish heresy or Christian heresy – I still can’t decide which one I would side more with because it walks the middle ground between both since the Son of Mary (pbuh) is such a polarizing figure between the two.

    Presumably, these are just different standards for transcribing Arabic into English, but do you have any idea why the change occurred?

    The only thing I can think of is that “Muslim” and “Muhammad” are more accurate transliterations. Phonetically, there is no “o” sound (as in “note”) in the classical Arabic language. Perhaps, like your Chinese examples, people simply became more sensitive to these things.

    But it’s not a hard and fast rule – certain Muslim cultures do pronounce the name like “Mohammad” and I’ve met plenty of Muslims who name their kids that way. I have to ask people (if I’m adding them to my contacts) which way they spell their version.

    Peace.

    *The Qur’an, along with the Biblical prophets (pbut), also mentions specific prophets that were sent among the various Arab people (Salih and Hud [pbut]) for example.

    Note to people who want to argue about this (I’m not interested): Obviously all of this is contingent on belief, but I’m simply outlining the doctrine since I was asked. The entire subject is quite intriguing; as Ms. Crone once pointed out, the Byzantines and Persians knew and documented what happened in Northern and Southern Arabia, but the middle of it was “terra incognita”. There are literally no outside independent sources to verify any of the claims, including whether Jews even lived there.

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @EliteCommInc.
    , @Anon
  263. Malla says:
    @Talha

    I doubt what I wrote was based on hagarism. I got this from sources where I do not see anything like Hagerism. Secondly I said this was a possibility I never said I am sure about this. But I still believe this is a very good possibility. I even believe in the possibility that Christianity itself was a pshy op against the Roman Empire (The combined Classical Roman Empire not the one based in Constantinople much later)

    http://thechristiansolution.com/tcs_book/SupportDocs_TCS/TCS158.htm

    https://exposingthelieofislam.wordpress.com/the-truth-about-the-origins-and-spread-of-islam-how-the-jews-developed-the-program-of-islam-to-invade-and-destroy-the-east/

    Anyways I am not anti Islamic nor anti Christian. I think both religions have positive and negative aspects. Indeed both Christian morality and Islamic Justice impress me greatly. What I believe is that Islam and Christianity took their final shape centuries later than their primary events (Life/Crussification of Christ and the revelations to Prophet Muhamed). Just because I consider both of these movement pshy ops does not mean I am against them. Indeed I believe a lot positive things were added to both these religions later with time and are syncretic in nature. Well this is just my belief or conclusions I have come from my readings.

    Peace

    • Replies: @Talha
  264. Truth says:
    @Malla

    Black WAS “the tribe” in the time of ancient Egypt. That’s why these people call them selves

  265. renfro says:
    @geokat62

    ” .” Through the Zionist movement, however, the Jews would be able to create a state in the Middle East dedicated to the same ideals of equality that underlay the Declaration of Independence; Zionism would actualize the possibility of extending the Jeffersonian American vision of a free society with the promise of “liberty and justice for all.”

    Perfect example of the deficit in the Jewish brain that makes them incapable of recognizing hypocrisy.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  266. @SMK

    The “sexual revolution” of the 1060′s was created by men to liberate women, sexually, for the benefit of men who could now have sex outside of marriage.

    The Battle of Hastings in 1066 changed the course of history, but I did not know about this. I knew the Normans were into rape and pillage, but did not realize that they brought birth control pillage with them.

    • LOL: Talha
  267. geokat62 says:
    @renfro

    Perfect example of the deficit in the Jewish brain that makes them incapable of recognizing hypocrisy.

    Or, from their perspective, it might be a perfect example of the deficit in the Goyim brain that makes them incapable of recognizing deception.

  268. […] The Unz Review: Harvey Sweinstein and Hollywood’s Hos ILANA MERCER […]

  269. Talha says:
    @Talha

    For the record, I’m very excited about the various archaeological expeditions which are recently starting to take place in the interior parts of Saudi Arabia. Unfortunately the kingdom has historically generally not been receptive to it and many archaeological sites (especially of Islamic significance) have already been bulldozed to make room for the mega-bucks hotel and resort-like accommodations the Saudis are building in cities like Makkah and Madinah.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/19/science/saudi-arabia-gates-google-earth.html

    https://www.livescience.com/12864-google-earth-saudi-archaeology-tombs.html

    • Replies: @Malla
  270. Talha says:
    @Malla

    Hey Malla,

    Thanks for the links. I appreciate your response and I didn’t detect any hostility from you regarding the subject matter in the first place; I simply wanted to interject some clarifications since it is a subject I have also made a study of.

    I see where you could draw your conclusions based on your sources. I personally prefer academic sources that have gone through peer review. For instance, Prof. Hoyland and people like him are at the cutting edge of translating some of the earliest papyri documents that we have from Late Antiquity (one of his more recent exciting papers was on one of the earliest recorded dhimmah agreements from the Nessana region).

    Websites labeled “Exposing the Lie of Islam” generally don’t give me confidence in their care about the facts regarding the subject matter. But, to each his own. Best of luck to you in discovering the truth about this and other matters.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Malla
  271. Malla says:
    @Talha

    Well my main gist of the whole thing was that the ‘invade the world, invite the world’, of using various peoples against each other is a very old one. So I kept up the possibility of the spread of Islam from Arabia being one such operation. I do not believe anything for sure as I do not have a time machine to go check out facts in the past. I look at possibilities which range from Mohammed did not exist and was invented later to all the way that Prophet Mohammed was really the last prophet of God and had received revelations from God and the Koran are those revelations. I am open to all possibilities. Similarly maybe Jesus never existed and was a invented figure to the possibility that he was just a messenger of God and was not crucified (Islamic belief) to the possibility that Jesus was really the Son of God who died for our sins.

    Even if I ignore the theory of Islam being a movement created to destroy ancient Persia/Byzantium, I still see a lot of other parallels in history to what is happening today. Similar to todays‘invade the world, invite the world policy’ being carried out in the name of the West. I wonder if European colonialism or the Roman Empire went the same path as today’s USA. And the ‘chosen people’ were present in all of those empires. Why would the British suddenly attack the Boers? If not for diamond mines which the chosen tribe wanted along with Rhodes. What enmity would the British peoples have with the White Boers in South Africa? Diamonds in South Africa, Oil in the Middle East.
    For example I have come upon data which point to the fact that ‘the chosen tribe’ had funded some of the Crusades of the European Christians to the Middle East. At the same time they cooperated with the Moorish conquest of Visigothic Iberia by treachery. Same Invade the World, Invite the World we see today.

    Islam may actually have many of the answers to the problems of the manufactured modern world of today of hyper consumerism, 3rd wave feminism, promiscuity, collapse of families etc…. However the powers behind the scenes are even using Islam or a twisted version of Islam for their nefarious plans (same with Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and others) with Wahabism and creation of groups like ISIS.

  272. @Talha

    Uhhhh, no. The prophets you mention are not among both groups of people and its not contingent on belief. It’s contingent on whether both sets of prophets can be found in both texts.

    In that accord, the answer is no. While some have attempted to link the prophet via the root meaning, the case is not supportable upon reading the text.

    And I agree. I won’t argue about it either.

    • Replies: @Talha
  273. Malla says:
    @Another Realist

    The 4000+ years Black Jewish alliance (NAACP) of the ancient world in Egypt. How history repeats itself.

    A black African and a semite

    The above picture is on Pharoah Tutankhamen’s footwear. Everytime he would walk he would step on the NAACP (black Jewish alliance) of his day. LOL

  274. Malla says:
    @Talha

    Yes I did read about that. The Saudis are turning Mecca into a tasteless Las Vegas type tourist place. And they have turned the Prophet’s tomb into a public toilet it seems. That regime is very very sinister.

    • Replies: @Talha
  275. Talha says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Hello EliteCommInc.,

    I actually don’t consider this arguing; we are now going to discuss on points of logic and epistemology. I consider arguing to be when some random person assumes to tell me what I actually believe as a Muslim. I have learned creed under a mufti who learned directly under the late Damascene scholar, Shaykh Adib Kallas (ra) (http://www.sheikhynotes.co.uk/2009/06/sheikh-adib-al-kallas.html), so I’m fairly confident about what Islam says about belief – and if I’m not, I have the contact info for at least 4 muftis that I can escalate any question to. That is the kind of debate I don’t want to get into; if someone thinks I’m lying, that’s cool, just post something about my taqiyyah awesomeness and move on, no need to waste each other’s time.

    But you’re not doing that so, let’s commence…

    The prophets you mention are not among both groups of people

    Correct. The Jewish and Christian narrative is that the Semites (particularly the descendants of Isaac [pbuh]) have the monopoly on divine revelation. We disagree; the Qur’an makes it clear that God sent prophets and messengers to various nations – some He names and some are mentioned without name. The Arab prophets were mentioned because they were the most relevant to the people at the time.

    its not contingent on belief

    It is absolutely.

    It’s contingent on whether both sets of prophets can be found in both texts.

    The Qur’an sometimes confirms or contradicts or adds to the Biblical narrative. One must come to coherent explanation of why that is; ours is fairly straightforward – the Qur’anic narrative is true and it claims that the older texts cannot be relied upon due to corruption, interpolation, etc.* and it has come to make corrections and set the record straight, in fact this is part of its raison d’etre.

    You are using one text to refute the differences in the other – that is predicated on your belief that; a) the Bible is inerrant, b) the Bible has been reliably preserved. As the Arabs say, “La budda minhu” -this is impossible to escape.

    the case is not supportable upon reading the text

    Again, this is fine if you are dealing with a Muslim who is making that case – I do not because I simply don’t have much confidence in the source text of the Bible.

    Peace.

    *Note: To this day serious believing Biblical scholars are trying to figure out which parts of their source texts are indeed part of the original narrative. For sure, any assumptions about the reliability of the Old Testament are completely based on belief – it talks about events that took place over 2000 years before the earliest manuscripts.

  276. Talha says:
    @Malla

    Hey Malla,

    And they have turned the Prophet’s tomb into a public toilet it seems.

    The Muslim world would have gone to war with them if they had tried that. It was the site of his birth place actually. His tomb is in Madinah and fairly well kept after.

    That regime is very very sinister.

    No arguments there.

    Saudi Arabia is a potential gold mine for archaeological discoveries. Scientists have found evidence that it was actually verdant for thousands of years after the Ice Age until around five thousand years ago when it started drying up. Not too long ago, they found traces of a people living in an area called al-Maqqar. There are indications that horses might have been first domesticated there thousands of years before Central Asia (which is the current theory):

    http://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/201203/discovery.at.al-magar.htm

    This would help explain why the Arabian breed is so unique among horses (for instance, some of their breeding lines actually have one less vertebrae and rib than other horses).

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Sean
  277. Sean says:
    @Talha

    The main line of the Arabian breed is descendants of Muhammad, some of whose wives were obtained by massacring Jewish families and taking the little girls. If Weinstein had been in Muhammad’s shoes, he would have behaved no worse, or better. Young women in Hollywood are simply leading with their strength, they are free to do that in the West.

    • Replies: @Talha
  278. Talha says:
    @Malla

    Saudis are pretty nuts when it comes to this – due to their Wahhabi influence. They have destroyed hundreds of historical sites and mausoleums due to their extreme iconoclasm. It is very upsetting. Yes some people go to extremes in venerating those sites, but the solution is to educate them, not turn them into parking lots.

    The Saudis seem to forget…

    The juxtaposition is quite stark, but without that humble little box in the middle of the desert and what it represents, they could build whatever they wanted and nobody would bother to come.

    Peace.

  279. Talha says:
    @Sean

    Hey Sean,

    some of whose wives were obtained by massacring Jewish families and taking the little girls

    I’ve seen this line of thinking before. And it’s pushed by specific groups of people – usually tied to Zionist financial backing for obvious reasons. The underlying premise is to accept that wherever something bad happens to the Jews, they are always victims – this is key. Thus, you have a priori established the guilt of anyone who does anything to any group of them. The context is always claimed to be irrelevant. Europe can beat itself over the head about this, but we take every case on its own merits. Sometimes Muslims killed Jews in pogroms in which they had no right to do so, in some cases there was a martial conflict and Jews usually ended up on the losing side and sometimes they even fought alongside Muslims.

    The only widespread killing of adult male Jews was done in the aftermath of the Battle of Khandaq in dealing with the Bani Quraiza tribe. They had thrown in their lot with a massive Arab confederate army that was besieging Madinah – the outcome for the Muslims would have been disastrous. That type of treachery could not go unanswered; the majority of their adult males were put to death and their women and children taken into bondage (as per norms of Late Antiquity). A minority of the men were spared due to them taking no part in the treachery. Lesson to be learned; don’t side with pagans against an emissary of God, especially when you have previously pledged your support to him – it’s a very, very stupid thing to do.

    The Jewish tribes of Bani Qaynuqa and Bani Nadhir also clashed swords with the Prophet (s), their men were not massacred at all. They came to terms; in one case – exile, in the other – tribute of half the value of their date harvests.

    If you want to get your information from JihadWatch and stuff – cool with me man. Why not do one better and send some checks to them and support their work? Snake oil takes money to produce.

    If Weinstein had been in Muhammad’s shoes, he would have behaved no worse, or better.

    That’s nice – the Prophet (pbuh) never touched a woman in a sexual manner that wasn’t his wife or concubine. Weinstein fails miserably by these metrics.

    I know you guys have this really funny idea about who he was – I’d suggest reading some serious academic literature on the topic and picking up a book like the Sham’il of Imam Tirmidhi (ra) that describes the man. He was a well built man that stayed in very fit shape until his end years, handsome to all who laid eyes on him, he had only 14 white hairs even in advanced age, and was known to go to battle in the heat of the Arabian desert wearing two sets of armor, at the Battle of Hunayn he moved forward alone when the Muslims retreated until his uncle Abbas (ra) rallied them back. LOL! Do you even understand basic female psychology? There are hadith where women were willingly approaching him for marriage and he turned them down.

    Peace.

  280. Sean says:

    Well, Muhammad may have convinced himself that it was in self defence that his movement massacred Jewish communities, and stole their choice females, but I suspect it was because found the Jews an easier target than ferocious infidel Arabian tribes who had already given him a bloody nose. He may have behaved no worse than others of his time, but he didn’t behave any better. I think it is quite rare for men to behave better than they could in relation to female sexuality.

    • Replies: @Talha
  281. Talha says:
    @Sean

    Hey Sean,

    but I suspect it was because found the Jews an easier target

    Bro, you can suspect whatever you want – you can suspect he was an alien with big bug eyes for all we care. Your narrative isn’t supported by the source texts. You can derive any cynical motives your mind please – it’s not like you can claim objectivity on the matter. C’mon man your bias toward the subject is obvious just from your tone – at least try to feign objectivity to bolster your case.

    And if you claim we made up the source texts – cool – thanks for shooting your star witness in the face. You have no case; there were no Jews – we made the whole thing up to make us look like Late Antiquity bad-asses.

    than ferocious infidel Arabian tribes

    Those same ferocious Arab tribes are the ones who preserved the very narrative you are trying to use to crucify him. Who do you think compiled all this stuff – the Incas?

    The earliest source texts of Islam are the self-disclosure of the historical narrative of the tribes of the Hijaz and surrounding areas.

    in relation to female sexuality

    Keep telling yourself women like males that are snuggle pillows:

    We have no interest in swallowing the feminist narrative.

    Peace.

  282. @Truth

    Truth,check out the pic of Lauren Bacall. That must push your Black-O-Meter to the danger zone. (By the time I was old enough to know who Bacall was,she was quite scarey looking.But at 19…)

    • Replies: @Truth
  283. Truth says:
    @Father O'Hara

    Lawrence Bacall does nothing for me, my friend. I’m interested in God’s genetic women not expensive facsimiles.

    I call them GIGO’s; Gender Inversed Generational Operatives, but “androgynes” will also suffice. My friend, the red pill is about to be forcefed to you, get your larynx ready.

  284. @utu

    The Daily Mail article doesn’t provide a mug shot of the US Marshall. Could it be that he was also a handsome stud muffin with lots of “pussy magnet” personality? Can’t exactly say that about Weinstein now, can we?

  285. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Talha

    A very interesting book in this connection, from a non-Muslim point of view, is “The Origins of Islam in its Christian Environment”. I forget the author, but the topics he raised were quite interesting.

  286. Skeptikal says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Agree. Anyone can see that Weinstein is an animal.
    I have no doubt that HW has “pressed” himself on many women in obnoxious ways, but it is hard to keep a straight face when Rose McGowan is appointing herself the champion of decent womanhood.
    Even before I saw her flaunting her basically bare butt in the photos linked above. She was flaunting her boobs and made up like a streetwalker.
    I wonder, would these women prefer it if no men at all noticed their sexual blandishments? Or are they supposed to look but don’t touch. That is only in movies about beautfiul nuns who get rescued by respectful white knights such as Robert Mitchum from disastrous situations where their habits have been swept away by the elements . . .
    The real hottie was Grace Kelly. She was known to be a lady in the drawing room, a whore in the bedroom, and her complex tease of Hitchcock resulted in “apex” films for both artists, and for the world.

    Signed: A Girl

  287. Treg says:

    Jewish liberals with lots of money, gee what could go wrong?…. lets see, you suckled and nursed your special case of suffering from white antisemitism and you taught “people of color” to feel and taste the same milk of resentment too. Then you taught and lectured about your victimhood for decades and you kicked, laughed at, and spat at ANY glorification and admiration of white female beauty power. Heck, it gave your 5 inch boner an extra stiffness to defile any “pure white woman” in your eyes. You exploited the young skinny white starlets with your clever promises of fame and Harvard contracts for money. And you applaud still more liberal causes and wink when the brothers score a fat white one. It’s not that you smile at white mixing; it’s that you do it all for the wrong reasons. Jewish liberal pedifilla gets the crowning achievement award for screwing with whitey…. and they lust for it becsuse it breaks people permanently. Meanwhile whites world wide are tribe less and feel open to all the world’s people and are blissfully unaware of the Jewish lead liberal nursing of victimology and resentment against them — for their race. Liberalism is now as antiwhite as nazism was antijew.

  288. Caterina says:

    There was a quid pro quo with these women. Yet, in Blame White Males America, there is no room for culpability with the women who ‘negotiated’ multi-million dollar movie and music contracts. Yes, they got money and opportunity in exchange for sex acts with Harvey. Not ALL of them were victims. Some of them were conniving, ambitious, greedy women who played a game they knew to expect from the reputation of Harvey the Swine. So, let’s stop being naive and investigate the bank accounts of these female “Victims”.

  289. JGarbo says:
    @Rurik

    Only shiksas? Oh thank God. He’s still a good Jewish boy.

  290. JGarbo says:
    @Dave Pinsen

    Cyrus has a big voice, a smart performer and knows her audience. Old Ilana’s just spruiking her old book. Give her some leeway.

  291. JGarbo says:
    @Bayan

    The male equivalent of FGM is penectomy. Cut it all off! Hard to circumcise a clitoris, since it has no foreskin (it became the clitoral hood). FGM is mainly a Christian practise.
    More anatomy research required.

  292. JGarbo says:
    @Art

    Hate to sink you Ark. There’s no “white race”. We’re all just humans (though I’d qualify that in a serious discussion). As for “white”, the whitest people I’ve met are Chinese, Japanese and Korean and Northern Thai. The fabled White man is a pallid pink, even when he’s sober.

  293. Svigor says:

    To listen to conservative talkers, the women affronted or assaulted by Weinstein were all Shakespearean talent in the making—female clones of Richard Burton (he had no match among women)—who made the pilgrimage to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Hollywood Hills, for the purpose of realizing their talent, never knowing it was a meat market. Watching the women who make up the dual-perspective panels “discussing” the Weinstein saga, it’s hard to tell conservative from liberal.

    Jews and Shabbos Goys keep using this “look a squirrel!” routine in response to Jew-bashing over Weinstein. Perhaps because I’m not a conservative, and I haven’t shown an erg of white-knighting for the women, I’ve found it laughable. In fact, I’ve ignored the women entirely, because they aren’t the issue. The Hollywood-sized blob of Jewish sleaze is the issue.

    Like Mercer, a lot of the Jew-worshiping right has been furiously trying to pivot to anti-feminism, manosphere rhetoric, etc. It’s not working on me, because I’m not a feminist and I’m not white-knighting for anyone. I’m bashing Jews.

    It’s not men getting the knife here. It’s Jews. Rich, sleazy, bigmouth, hypocritical, phony-leftist Jews. As everyone has been saying, this is the best entertainment to come out of Hollywood in a generation.

    Cuckservatives are hardcore woman-worshipping [sic] feminists first and foremost.

    They will put aside any other objective when the prospect of groveling to women presents itself.

    They (cucks), like you (cuck), worship and fear Jews, first and foremost.

    Go ahead, cucks, squeal. The knife goes into the Jews, they squeal, you squeal in sympathy; it’s all music to my ears.

  294. Svigor says:

    The Jew/Jew-cuck Narrative (packaged for the right) formed up pretty quickly on this one: call the Jew-bashers cucks. It’s not gonna work, because Jew-bashers fucking invented the insult. Nobody, but nobody, is less cucked than a Jew-basher, period, end of story.

    It’s deliciously pathetic to watch; Jew-cucks desperately trying to save their Jew-pimp overlords from the mob of angry shiksas beating them to a pulp. It would make a great scene in a movie, really, with lots of wigs and rugs hanging half-off, stiletto heels as improvised weapons, etc.

    Just to put all of this in it’s proper frame: the Jew-cucks are coming to the rescue of their Jew-pimp overlords. We, on the other hand, are enjoying every minute of watching the two parties fight it out. The Jew-cucks are calling the Jew-bashers cucks in hopes that no one will notice how hard they are cucking for their Jew-pimp overlords.

    Judeo-Christian values. Just ask any cuckservative.

    Indeed. I hope this judo-flip becomes standard practice. Charity is Christian. Witch-burning is Judeo-Christian.

    I love reading Ilana Mercer’s politically incorrect take on events and her brilliant use of language..

    Protecting the Tribe ain’t politically incorrect, it’s Big Brother’s Mandate. Bashing Jew Hollywood swine qua Jew Hollywood swine, that’s politically incorrect. If this were a tableau, my political incorrectness would be on top of Ilana’s, straddling its face, draping its nutsack on its forehead.

    Pussies don’t get to claim top of the taboo totem.

    Has the race into the sewer been a consequence of loose women of America (England, etc..) driving the decline?

    Or, are the causes a more a top down affair? IOW resulting from the big-money producers and all those men who run Hollywood?

    When Whiskey wakes up in the small hours, sweating, he hears my voice ringing in his ears, speaking those words.

    LOL. Cucks.

    Every woman could have said No to Mr. “Sweinstein”. Bros before hos are the name of the game not only in Hollywood. The hypocrites should not lament. It takes two to tango!

    Cuck-slave mentality. Racial brothers before racial others.

    So if Jews did not exist, there’d be no pimps, no whores, no pornographers, no casting couches, no skanks, no randy porcine slobs, and no feminist shrews

    Well, there’d be a lot fewer, and less prominent, let’s put it that way. Jews are sleazy, comments about unicorns aren’t going to clean them up.

    It’s remarkable how antisemitic and feminist responses to this affair both cast the putative victims as passive naifs.

    Horseshit. Find one comment of mine that even gives off a whiff of that. Nope, I’ve been kidney-punching the Jewish sleaze the whole time, period, end of story.

    “Jew is shitbag pimp. Funny how many of those there are in the world.”
    “You’re white-knighting.”
    “Jew is shitbag pimp. Funny how many of those there are in the world. And Jew-cucks, there are a lot of those, too.”

  295. Svigor says:

    Think about how cucked it is to blame the decline of the west on…women. It takes a shriveled, cucked, Smeagol-esque soul to latch on to that tactic.

    As if women have the juice for that, lol.

    And to do this Wormtongue/Smeagol routine on behalf of Jews? Oy vey.

  296. Svigor says:

    *Jew runs away from angry mob of goyim with satchel full of stolen jewels*
    “It vas da wymmin! The shiksas did it, not me! They’re the villains here!”

    Reminds me of when black men respond to the fact that blacks get AA with the fact that white women get AA, and are supposedly primarily to blame for the situation; can there be anything more emasculating than sitting on your ass on the racial spoils gravy train and pointing the finger at women to get the heat off yourself? “Abandon ship! Black and Jewish men first! Women and children last!”

  297. Svigor says:

    “I can’t stand these Niggers blaming everyone else for their own problems – when are they going to take responsibility??!!”

    Followed by…

    “It’s these Niggers and Jews that are ruining our kids!”

    The cognitive dissonance – enough to fry an egg on!

    Peace.

    There’s no cogdis. Jews and blacks are quite similar in their relationship to whites. Whites are the golden geese both hostile minorities follow around, whine about constantly, berate constantly, etc. When blacks/Jews aren’t talking shit on whites, they’re behaving as if their lives depended upon them. Jews and blacks both go ape at the idea of YT living apart from them. Jews and blacks both pursue tribalism/racialism, but act as though whitey doing the same is the height of evil. Muh slavery/muh holocaust. Whites are fine with Jews and blacks living apart, having ethnostates, etc.

    I can throw Muslims into the same category, now that I think of it.

    There are some similarities for you to mull over, parallels for you to draw next time you wanna open your yap.

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @Truth
  298. Svigor says:

    To put a finer point on it:

    Jews follow whites around, act as if living in our societies is a God-given right.
    Blacks follow whites around, act as if living in our societies is a God-given right.
    Muslims follow whites around, act as if living in our societies is a God-given right.

    Of course, all three groups do the exact opposite of reciprocating.

    Whites would be just fine if we woke up to a world without any of you.

  299. Svigor says:

    Hate to sink you Ark. There’s no “white race”.

    Horseshit. Antiquated leftist pseudo-science.

    Jews don’t exist, though. They’re a social construct.

  300. Talha says:
    @Svigor

    Hey Svigor,

    I can throw Muslims into the same category, now that I think of it.

    If you say so. Like I said on another thread – the Venn diagram doesn’t work. Being white and being Muslim is not mutually exclusive:

    http://almadinainstitute.org/teachers/yahya-rhodus/

    Whites make pretty darn good Muslims actually. Here’s one running a seminar on creed with a bunch of dark Muslims learning at his feet:

    White, Black, Yellow – these are all avatars we’ve been given for this contingent reality (a lot like virtual reality) called life. It’s a self contained system – you didn’t get to choose the avatar when you got plugged in to start the game and you won’t be able to take it with you get unplugged. The maggots and worms will enjoy feasting on your brains just as much as a Black man’s or a Jew’s – maybe White people taste better – I don’t know because cannibalism is haram. Your loved ones (likely White people) with be the ones throwing dirt on your carcass and dividing up all the stuff you thought was yours until you realized it was as useful as monopoly money. Hey look at all the piles of cash I don’t get to take with me!

    You got problems with non-Whites? Fine, kick us out. Maybe that gives your existence some meaning.

    As far as the Whites who become Muslim, do they magically lose White status? Why? What if they only marry other Whites and produce White kids to help pick up the White population; ’cause let me tell you, White Muslims I know are quite, ahem, fecund.

    Whites are fine with Jews and blacks living apart, having ethnostates, etc.

    So make it happen – what’re you waiting for? Until you are a minority? How does that make sense? Hey man – I’m all for muh White-only utopias – I think Whites that hate being around other people deserve each other. I mean, I’d hate living around people I couldn’t stand – that’s like being in prison – you can’t enjoy life like that. If you bring up a nation-wide vote for a break away White ethno-nation state – I promise you in my capacity as a US citizen, I will help vote for it.

    Could I be allowed to visit one of your theme parks though (just on temporary basis)? I’m pretty sure we’re going to screw ours up through lack of maintenance or poop on the seats or rape cats in the communal bathrooms or something. I would be willing to wear a shirt that says “Non-White” AND a GPS bracelet!

    Peace.

  301. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Angry arab writes:

    [Harvey Weinstein and the Mossad agents who spied on women accusers: Israel's dirty hands in every dirty story
    "Black Cube, an enterprise run largely by former officers of Mossad and other Israeli intelligence agencies. Black Cube, which has branches in Tel Aviv, London, and Paris, offers its clients the skills of operatives “highly experienced and trained in Israel’s elite military and governmental intelligence units,” according to its literature." You would think that this should be a big story. A foreign intelligent agency is spying on American women who accused an American businessman of rape and sexual assault. Imagine if an Arab-American accused of rape and assault were to hire "former" intelligence agents from Syria or Egypt to spy and harass and intimidate American women. Will feminists in the US speak about this dirty role of Israel here?]

  302. Truth says:
    @Svigor

    Sviggy don’t be a Cuck. Everybody knows it’s white people that follow Jews and do everything Jews tell them to.

  303. Agonistes says:

    Of course women are more exhibitionistic than men; when it comes to sex, they are the sellers and men are the buyers. A nude Weinstein, Woody Allen, Kevin Spacey, et. al. would be emetic.

  304. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Another Realist

    Because this:

    is so much less dignified than this:

    .

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.