The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Women's March as Coalition of Fringes in Action
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Jewish publications have been getting worked up lately over how several of the celebrated leaders of the anti-Trump Women’s March are big fans of the anti-Semitic Louis Farrakhan and employed the Black Muslims’ bully boy squad, Fruit of Islam (or “Fruit” for short … yeah, that’s the name), as security. The details nicely illustrates Ann Coulter’s point, which she made talking about Farrakhan supporters starting the Women’s March, about how the only thing intersectionalists can come together over is hating the White Man.

The story is kind of boring and complicated to follow, so I’ve abridged it and added the intersectional IDs of the various leaders of the Women’s March. From Tablet:

KEY PARTICIPANT AT CENTER OF WOMEN’S MARCH STORY CONFIRMS ANTI-JEWISH INCIDENT
New information from two participants at the first Women’s March meeting contradicts statement by current co-chair and corroborates a ‘contentious conversation’ about race and Jewishness took place

By Leah McSweeney and Jacob Siegel
December 13, 2018 • 5:41 PM

On Dec. 10, Tablet published an article about the Women’s March. The piece opened with a description of the first-ever meeting of the nascent organization, during which—according to multiple sources who spoke with Tablet about the exchange–two of its current co-chairs were said to have directed anti-Jewish statements at Vanessa Wruble [Jewish], one of the other women present.

Reached by Tablet today, Wruble confirmed the account as described in the original story. …

[Cassady] Fendlay [white] told Tablet that she definitely did not recall the specific claims described as having been made, but, in opposition to [Tamika] Mallory [black] and [Bob] Bland’s [uh … “Bland was praised for her complex stance as being both beneficiary of white privilege, as a white woman, and fighting for change as a minority, trans-woman, non-binary,” so there you go] initial statement, noted that the meeting was indeed heated at distinct points—including around the subject of Jews and Jewishness. “I do remember this conversation being contentious,” she said. “I do remember specifically Vanessa Wruble [Jewish] saying Jewish people don’t count, Jewish people aren’t white—basically saying like all the stuff that you’re saying doesn’t apply to me. And I do remember that sparking a response.”

Fendlay [white] continued: “I personally am committed to, this is why I show up in the movement, and I’m all about holding whiteness accountable—regardless of the religion of the white person.” …

Asked about Tablet’s report that Mallory [black] or [Carmen] Perez [Latinx] had asserted Jews were leaders in the slave trade—a regular drumbeat of Louis Farrakhan’s—Fendlay [white] said she “never heard anything said about that in everything that I have ever experienced working with these women. It doesn’t even make sense.” In a tweet last month, Fendlay [white] wrote: “White people are to blame for the suffering of African Americans. Those white people have been all different faiths & they justified themselves, it’s certainly not their religions’ fault. The Jews who participated in the slave trade were abetting many anti-Semites in the South.”

For her part, Wruble [Jewish] is hoping to move on. “Any activity people engage in is poised to be influenced by conscious and unconscious biases. We all have them,” she said. “I, too, want to fight the systems that uphold white and male privilege. But right now we are being pitted against one another, and I’m seeing conservatives use the controversies to undermine the women’s march movement as a whole. I refuse to let that happen. I am a proud culturally Jewish progressive and intend to work with progressives everywhere to fight back against the bad policies that, frankly, white men [white, male] have been imposing on all of us. That has to be our priority moving forward.”

Progressives everywhere must unite to fight the white (man).

 
Hide 215 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. El Dato says:

    This is like 6-year old kids in the school yard deciding in which pressure group they want to be most. The throwing of lunch leftovers will start soon, somone will piss on someone’s homework folder, then the beatings will begin.

    I’m seeing conservatives use the controversies to undermine the women’s march movement as a whole.

    AS A WHOLE!

    But are those white or jewish conservatives or something else entirely?

    (What is “women’s” about the “women’s” march btw?)

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
  2. In Global Coalition Of The Fringes news, Ghana removes a statue of Gandhi for not being very Woke in 1904.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/14/racist-gandhi-statue-removed-from-university-of-ghana

    “A Mahatma Gandhi statue has been removed from the campus of the University of Ghana after protests from students and faculty who argue the Indian independence leader considered Africans “inferior”.

    The statue was unveiled at the university in the Ghanian capital Accra two years ago but has been the subject of controversy and was removed in the middle of the night on Tuesday, leaving just an empty plinth.

    Scholars have highlighted evidence in past years showing the revered freedom-fighter, whose theories of civil resistance helped India throw off British colonialism and inspired generations of activists including Martin Luther King Jr, held derogatory views towards native communities in South Africa.

    A 2015 book by two South African writers pointed to instances where Gandhi complained that Indians were being forced to use the same separate entrances as Africans, meaning “their civilised habits … would be degraded to the habits of aboriginal natives”.”

  3. Hail says: • Website

    I, too, want to fight the systems that uphold white and male privilege. But right now we are being pitted against one another

    I sense the kernel, here, of a mantra-like text that could said weekly (Sunday works), among a congregated group of the like-minded, at a building designed for that purpose, as a collective reminder of the core mission of the religion social justice movement.

    Here is a model to help fill out the rest. A lot of its elements are already in place:

    [MORE]

    Our Father who art in heaven,
    Hallowed be thy name.
    Thy kingdom come.
    Thy will be done
    on earth as it is in heaven.
    Give us this day our daily bread,
    and forgive us our trespasses,
    as we forgive those who trespass against us,
    and lead us not into temptation,
    but deliver us from evil.
    For thine is the kingdom,
    and the power, and the glory,
    for ever and ever
    Amen.

    • Replies: @Redneck farmer
  4. Anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:

    ‘Black Muslims’.

    Now that really makes me laugh.

    Of course, nowhere in the Koran do you find an explicit condemnation of the institution of slavery, in fact one can discern the tacit acceptance and approval.
    The central tenet of Islam is the infallibility and absoluteness of the Koran. Thus, if slavery was an utterly abhorrent system and practice, doubtless an explicit condemnation would be made – in the same way as alcohol, gambling etc are condemned.

    Thus, if by some historical happenstance colonial America was Muslim rather than christian, the institution of enslaving African kaffir would likely still be practised right up to present day.

    • Replies: @Redneck farmer
    , @Corvinus
  5. bomag says:

    “First they came for the White man, and I gladly joined in, inflicting as much damage as I could…”

  6. Keep it up and somebody might one day figure out how to Unite the White.

    • Agree: Thea
    • Replies: @Corn
    , @Jason Roberts
  7. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @YetAnotherAnon

    I don’t really have a problem with this, to be honest.

  8. El Dato says:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    A 2015 book by two South African writers pointed to instances where Gandhi complained that Indians were being forced to use the same separate entrances as Africans, meaning “their civilised habits … would be degraded to the habits of aboriginal natives”.

    Can’t-get-it-derected sex guru Ghandi cackles from the grave as this is still his position.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  9. @Hail

    You want another Holocaust! Or something.

  10. @Anonymous

    Remember, chattel slavery was introduced to what became the greatest country on Earth by an African immigrant.

    • Agree: Mr. Rational
    • Replies: @Anon
  11. Joe Walker says: • Website

    Frankly, everybody must unite to fight the white man

    As long as he is a gentile.

  12. Trevor H. says:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The statue was unveiled at the university in the Ghanian capital Accra two years ago but

    But life comes at you fast, in the Current Year, that’s what.

  13. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    Instead of asking if some of the women are ‘antisemitic’, why don’t they ask why do Jewish women support Zionist tyranny of Palestinians and Wars for Israel?

    • Replies: @Anon
  14. @Dave Pinsen

    “I don’t really have a problem with this”

    Neither do I, I was more surprised that it was erected only two years ago. But it illustrates that the Coalition Of The Fringes are actually a pretty disparate bunch and that diversity isn’t a strength – in that they don’t actually like each other much.

  15. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    LOL. It just kills me. Ricky Boy’s revenge.

  16. The Fruit of Islam uniform used to be tuxedos and bowties, which made them look very stylish.

    I see that they’ve now adopted a French gendarmerie style uniform that makes them look like Pullman porters.

  17. duncsbaby says:
    @Dave Pinsen

    But Peter Beinart assured us it was only Confederate statues they’d be taking down!

  18. Anon[246] • Disclaimer says:

    I’ve got to say it, and frankly it scares me … but I’m beginning to sympathize with some of what Farrakhan is quoted as saying in that article. He’s kind of the Amy Wax of blacks, promoting a sort of bourgeoise value system for blacks. And he gets the “youths” to wear suits and ties and pull up their pants.

    • Replies: @anon
  19. @PiltdownMan

    The Fruit of Islam and neocons. Notorious bowtie wearers.

  20. PTT says: • Website

    As a Jew who actually cares about long-term Jewish survival, I would love to hear constructive suggestions on how to deal with such SJJW detractors to our cause. Zman’s suggestion to police our own is not really workable:
    https://posttenuretourettes.wordpress.com/2018/10/30/zman-to-jews-police-your-own/

    Zman at least recognizes that this behavior is harmful to Jews; do you also, Steve? How do you propose the non-suicidal Jews realistically deal with this?

  21. @El Dato

    (What is “women’s” about the “women’s” march btw?)

    Women are the marketing demographic that the Left, the Democrat party, and the MSM are going after now with a vengeance. Especially “Suburban Women™,” formerly known as “Soccer Moms™.”

    We are to believe that they are abandoning Donald Trump and the Republican Party like rats swimming from a sinking ship. Married, abused, underpaid — but privileged — they vote the way their white, male husbands tell them to, until they start voting the way their TVs tell them to.

  22. Whiskey says: • Website

    Wrong Steve. White men like us are the Fringe. They are the center and majority. It’s why we lose all the time. Every time. Refusal to see reality.

    And it’s why we need a good long hard war against China. To lever age our martial skill into the center. We are the Fringe because our rulers no longer need us. Let’s get needed again.

    No Womens marches during W W 2 decrying White men.

    • Replies: @njguy73
    , @tyrone
    , @ATBOTL
  23. Haha! The way you annotated your excerpt was very helpful, Steve. I think you could have dispensed with the names though, as I’m somehow having a hard time remembering these brave Social Justice Warriors. Why not just use Black-A, Latinx-B, Jew-A/Woman-D, etc in the story? A diagram would be helpful next time … just saying …

  24. The current targeting of women as a political demographic is an example of an advertising tactic known as the bandwagon effect. (Ninth grade “language arts” class didn’t involve any great novels or much writing, but it did include lessons about advertising. American public education has sucked for a long time.)

    We hear now about suburban women leaving the right and joining the left, as if this phenomenon is a fait accompli. The MSM is full of it. The Powers That Be want us, everyone, to think that this is happening. They expect that white women voters, through the bandwagon effect, will get the message and jump on the wagon with their sisters.

    This is human nature. People tend to go along with what they think or are told others are doing. In the current age, this is called creating a buzz around something.

    (When we should have been reading great English and writing about it, we adolescents in the 1970s were instead learning about sleazy propaganda techniques. Well, it could be said that we were thereby prepared to understand what is happening now.)

    • Replies: @Thea
    , @Jack D
  25. But what about the truth or untruth of the claim? Were Jews over-represented among the merchants who practised slave trading?

    Or is even asking such a question ruled out beforehand, regardless of what the facts might be?

  26. and another thing: This “Women’s March” name bugs the crap out of me too. Anytime you have a group named after something that should be a transient event, but was created to be a permanant fixture, you have a problem.

    Think about Cuba or China, and the ongoing 50-odd and 40-odd year, respectively, “revolutions” that were “in progress”. Actually, they weren’t even said to be “in progress”. It was supposed to be never-ending process. You weren’t a good citizen if you didn’t take a part in the revolution, even thought the old government had been overthrown and turned into a shithole 10 years before you were born. I don’t think the word revolution means what you think it means, Commies. By definition, it’s a transient thing. As the great Founders of America did, you start a revolution, and you get it the hell over with!

    When I read “Woman’s March”, I expect to see a bunch of old hags getting off their asses and walking down the street. When they get to the end of the route, then the march is over. That’s how marches work, bitchez.

    • Replies: @anon
  27. Steve

    Google:Gujarat India-violence against immigrants…..

  28. Steve,

    > the story is kind of boring … so I …

    You need to work harder to make me able to read that no doubt highly significant nonsense. Perhaps colorful frowny-faced icons for each intersectional (?) label? Otherwise MEGO.

    It’s deplorable I know: MEGO unless MAGA.

  29. sondjata says:

    “: “White people are to blame for the suffering of African Americans. Those white people have been all different faiths & they justified themselves, it’s certainly not their religions’ fault. The Jews who participated in the slave trade were abetting many anti-Semites in the South.””

    Those Africans who sold off other Africans for things such as bath tubs and cowery shells are of course blameless because:

    1) They didn’t understand what they were doing
    2) They were being threatened with canons and shit.
    3) They really didn’t benefit at all.
    4) The white man made them do it because the black man has to do whatever the white man says.
    5) none of the above
    6) all of the above except 5.

  30. Thea says:

    This was helpful, thank you. The sooner white women understand their place in the pecking order, the better.

    Searching for Findlay turns up the expected Rush Limbaugh predicted images along with an article castigating white women. I hope they make it crystal clear what they have in store.

  31. black sea says:
    @PiltdownMan

    Forgive me for pointing out the obvious, but the front-and-center Fruit of Islam appears to more white than anything else, not that you have to be black to be Muslim, but Nation of Islam is sort of a different kettle of fish.

    • Replies: @snorlax
  32. Well to be fair to the blacks here, this–particular–incident doesn’t sound like it was driven by Nation of Islam looniness or black anti-Semitism. Rather it sounds like it was driven by this Wruble prog running the “Jews aren’t white” scam:

    “I do remember specifically Vanessa Wruble [Jewish] saying Jewish people don’t count, Jewish people aren’t white—basically saying like all the stuff that you’re saying doesn’t apply to me. And I do remember that sparking a response.”

    Essentially: “We Jews are victims, we don’t have privilege it’s *white* people–i.e. white gentiles–who need a beating.”

    Wruble was particularly, clumsily transparent–and did this in front of blacks, who aren’t sufficiently whipped to buy it, and so got called on it. But basically this is the thought pattern we see in 90% of glop smeared on us by the media. It’s at the core of the ideology of Jewish minoritarianism–minorities good, majorites (white gentiles) bad–that is the establishment ideology of the modern age.

    ~~

    Even the Jews usual social position in Europe wasn’t what Americans think of as oppression–blacks, slavery, Jim Crow, bottom of socio-economic order. Rather the Jews were a middle man minority that was considerably more prosperous than the gentiles (more food, more surviving children, higher population expansions) who kept themselves religiously, culturally and genetically separate–with the entirely predictable result that the locals generally hated them. (Hating on the rich is quite typical. Rich people, who are not of your tribe, think you are beneath them and unfit to marry–the reaction is over-determined.) So the Jews in Europe at least have some real, actual, dead-bodies oppression they can trot out.

    But American Jews trying to pull that “we are oppressed” stuff is just a laugher. It seems to be a core part of Jewish identity … so they keep trotting it out. But it’s just pathetic. The holocaust gives them a whip to cow white gentiles into submission and silence. But the people who actually are at the bottom of the socio-economic order in the US–blacks–just aren’t going to sit still for the people at the top spouting that “Jews are oppressed” crap.

  33. Tulip says:

    I think Jews have a self-perception problem, in that Jews appear to believe they are not white (perhaps for historical reasons), but non-whites can’t really tell the difference between a NY Jew or a Boston Brahmin or a Georgia Good Ole Boy. They’re all white devils. You can look at Algeria or Zimbabwe if you want a historical example.

    Further, anti-white rhetoric is all recycled anti-Semitism anyways, so it is not very hard to turn it around back to its original origins. So what you see is Jews promoting rhetoric that provokes anti-Jewish sentiment on both the Left and Right.

    Ron Unz has his thesis that there has been a decline in Jewish IQ, perhaps the prominence of Jewish Activism in Anti-White rhetoric is further proof of cognitive decline. Or perhaps people just can’t accept its not who you think you are, its who your enemies think you are that matters. Just because you are sympathetic to the Palestinians doesn’t mean your kids can’t be blown up in a disco bombing, and just because you status signal support for BLM doesn’t mean you won’t get gunned down in cold blood on the mean streets of Chicago.

    • Replies: @Marty T
  34. snorlax says:
    @black sea

    Puts him in the company of NoI founder Fard Muhammad.

    • Replies: @black sea
  35. Thea says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    About 20 years ago I remember reading an article about how college students actually were have a lot less casual sex than they themselves believed. They all thought everybody else was having casual hookups all the time. Many get pressed to try to do so keep up. Big bowls of condonms in dorm common rooms certainly maintained this illusion. By exposure to the idea that everyone else was promiscuous, many students became so.

  36. anonomy says:

    Bland should try to be a black guy.

  37. black sea says:
    @snorlax

    Only the Blue-eyed Devil himself could be clever enough to cook up a scam like NOI.

  38. Svigor says:

    “I do remember specifically Vanessa Wruble [Jewish] saying Jewish people don’t count, Jewish people aren’t white—basically saying like all the stuff that you’re saying doesn’t apply to me.

    LoL.

  39. Svigor says:

    Fendlay [white] continued: “I personally am committed to, this is why I show up in the movement, and I’m all about holding whiteness accountable—regardless of the religion of the white person.” …

    LOL!!!

    This is great; the White has been so overtrained that she doesn’t know to grant her fellow (((huwhite))) her (((unprincipled exception))).

    The Jews who participated in the slave trade were abetting many anti-Semites in the South.”

    lolwhut?

    I am a proud culturally Jewish progressive

    A proud Jew is an anti-White activist? I’m shocked – shocked I tell u.

    • Replies: @CJ
  40. Lot says:

    “Bob Bland” is a normal heterosexual woman who randomly called herself genderqueer and took a man’s first name as an alias.

    She’s married with two kids.

    Like 30% of urban college girls these days claim to be bisexual but most never will actually so much as touch another woman below the belt. Same thing here with Red.

  41. Corn says:
    @The Alarmist

    White unite would do American society more good than white flight.

    • Agree: Hail
  42. Anonymous[396] • Disclaimer says:

    Two points:

    1. As per AnotherDad above, nobody except Jews sees Jews as “minorities” or “non-white.” If anything, for many people Jews are the archetypal whites, having 0 common cultural ground with non-whites (cf. Bill Clinton being described as America’s “first black President”).

    2. Nobody except white women sees white women as exclusively or primarily victims. At best, white women are slightly hapless fellow travelers who benefit from their whiteness while also suffering somewhat from their femaleness (but with the balance still coming out to favor privilege). At worst, white women are the pampered pets of the oppressor who use the comfort and security provided to them by white males to victimize and degrade minorities. Call a woman a “white bitch” and every black or Hispanic will know exactly what you mean.

  43. The other side doesn’t have an ideology. It has a hatred. It’s good to remember that.

    —————

    Regarding Jews, they seem to have two strategies entering this new world.

    1. Claim to be just another victim group and thus “not White” so as to avoid the hammer that is about to come down on Whites.

    Obviously, that’s not going to work. Elite Jews are so insular that they are actually surprised when non-Whites laugh at this claim. This will lead to the back-up strategy.

    2. Fly above the clouds

    Sure, a lot of hurt will come down on Whites – a group that non-Whites will correctly believe includes Jews. However, Jews will be able to buy/manipulate their way out of harm’s way. In essence, they’ll be able to fly above the clouds and avoid the storm. Look at affirmative action. Jews continue to hold 25% of seats at the Ivies. It’s the White goys who have lost their slots, not Jews.

    Housing policies demand that blacks live down the street. Maybe, but not in Jewish/rich neighborhoods for some weird legal reason that someone will come up with. Jewish private schools keep their kids safe. Jewish community centers give their kids a safe place to play.

    Here’s the thing. Their plan might just work. In fact, I’d love for Whites to follow it. That said, I’ve known a fair amount of middle and upper-middle class Jews who will get hurt by this coming world. They do fine, but they don’t have the money to fly above the clouds, just like their gentile White neighbors.

    Elite American Jews are going to hurt middle and upper-middle class Jews,

    • Replies: @Marty T
    , @Jack D
  44. Jack D says:
    @AnotherDad

    Hating on the rich is quite typical

    To call the Jews of E. Europe “rich” is delusional. The millions of Jews who showed up at Ellis Island didn’t leave because they were rich – they did so because they were desperately poor. There may have been a time when the Jews of Poland were relatively few in number and so their middle man minority niche was a profitable one. But they invested their “profits” in high fertility and ended up as 10% of the population of Poland. You don’t need 1 middle man for every 10 Polish peasants so they had to divide the same sized pie into ever smaller pieces and ended up desperately poor for the most part. Maybe in cash terms they had slightly higher incomes than Polish and Ukrainian peasants who lived largely outside the cash economy but were self sufficient in food. But you are comparing degrees of poverty, not richness.

  45. Anonymous[199] • Disclaimer says:

    The Wahmen’s March sounds like a “hot mess”

    They should learn some discipline from the thinkfluencers of the Homintern– would Jack Dorsey ever allow #OscarsSoGay to become a trending moment?

  46. donut says:
    @Lot

    She probably is the man of that house .

  47. Jack D says:
    @Lot

    This is really a very brilliant strategy. She (without having to take hormones or chop off her lady bits or anything) gets to label herself as one of the good people rather than as a despicable cisgender white woman. And no one will question her like Rachel Dolezal. All you have to do is identify yourself as “genderqueer” and call yourself “Bob” (never really did like Mari anyway) and instantly you gain thousands of Diversity Pokemon Points, so many points that you can sit opposite black people without having to hang your head in shame and grovel. Brilliant!

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  48. anonymous[351] • Disclaimer says:

    This anti-white race hatred is really getting deranged. This coalition of the fringes might seem like a good strategy to some wannabe Trotskyist but the inherent problem with it is that of leadership. The various people within it who fancy themselves as leaders, such as these lefty feminists, think that the others will bow down to them and accept their marching orders without question. However, the blacks usually think they’re supposed to be the ones in charge and issuing orders. Who’s got the greatest claim to victimhood? People like Wruble actually fancy that blacks would follow someone like her rather than listen to the NOI who are much more influential within black culture than most non-blacks realize. Just recently this website ran an article written by the NOI which repeatedly referred to Jews as “termites”, a rather nasty expression which illustrates the level of hatred the NOI has for other groups of people. One thing about all these fringe people is that almost all of them are parasites in one way or another, living off the productivity of the white man and then biting the hand that feeds them.

  49. Jack D says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Women are especially sensitive about “going along with the crowd” – this is why they all adopt the same fashions at the same time. Women who live together even synchronize their periods. There must be socio-biological evolutionary reasons for this.

    The Left tries to brainwash women (as they have brainwashed blacks) into thinking that the “normal” or default state of affairs is for women to be liberal Democrats. Any woman who is not a liberal Democrat is a deviant (and not in a good way like a lesbian, but a bad kind of deviant, the kind that you shun).

    I quote from this WSJ article, which otherwise sits behind their paywall:

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/check-your-progressive-privilege-11544656791?fbclid=IwAR2d_tPFLsSK-D-m_Ux34L9JQIMnuRbMisPrlZREmm7pML1AdU0fYNkRpIU

    CARRIE LUKAS: CHECK YOUR PROGRESSIVE PRIVILEGE.

    Progressives are constantly checking their “white privilege,” but what about ideological privilege? Particularly for women, the prevailing assumption is that you aren’t normal unless you’re a liberal Democrat. Conservative women aren’t only left out, but increasingly stigmatized.

    Women’s magazines and news outlets depict women who vote Republican as deviants. Vogue headlined a postelection commentary “Why Do White Women Keep Voting for the GOP and Against Their Own Interests?” The Guardian asked: “Half of White Women Continue to Vote Republican. What’s Wrong with Them?” The latter article asserted that “white women vote for Republicans for the same reason that white men do: because they are racist.” Barbra Streisand claimed “a lot of women vote the way their husbands vote; they don’t believe enough in their own thoughts.” Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama and Madeleine Albright have all expressed similar sentiments in public.

    Progressive women see their intellectual and political leaders glamorized in glossy magazine photo spreads and celebrated on daytime TV talk shows. Conservative female policy makers are invisible, if they’re lucky. Glamour’s 2018 Women of the Year included gun-control activists and anti-Trump celebrities, along with California Sen. Kamala Harris. No recognizably conservative woman made the cut.

    Progressive women enjoy the benefit of the doubt when they say insensitive or prejudiced things. Mrs. Clinton recently joked that two black men “look alike.” No conservative could get away with such a remark.

    College administrators tout the value of diversity. Yet the National Association of Scholars “could not find a single Republican with an exclusive appointment to fields like gender studies” among 8,688 tenure-track professors at 51 top liberal-arts colleges.

    Far-left activists next month march on Washington again under the banner “the Women’s March.” The media will present them as simply “women”—as if women with other views don’t exist.

    Rooting out bigotry isn’t easy. The first step is to recognize the prejudiced messages that make their way into the public square. A truly fair and inclusive society would include positive, aspirational images of conservative and libertarian women as well as liberal ones. It wouldn’t marginalize women for their ideology or politics any more than it would exclude women based on race, age, looks or sexual orientation.

    • Replies: @Autochthon
    , @AnotherDad
  50. Jack D says:

    Mallory [black] or [Carmen] Perez [Latinx] had asserted Jews were leaders in the slave trade—a regular drumbeat of Louis Farrakhan’s

    I hear that lie around here too sometimes. Maybe there’s potential for a different kind of Coalition of the Fringes ? WN’s could get together with blacks and Latinx’s and all hate together on Joos…

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
  51. Jack D says:
    @AnotherDad

    Even the Jews usual social position in Europe wasn’t what Americans think of as oppression–blacks, slavery, Jim Crow, bottom of socio-economic order.

    It depends on where and when. Yes, under the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Poland was the Paradisus Iudaeorum. But in most of the rest of Europe, Jews were under all sorts of legal and practical disabilities which indeed resemble Jim Crow in many respects – forbidden to hold office, own land, etc. And the Commonwealth ended in 1795 and the Jews of Poland found themselves under the Czars, some of whom made no secret of the fact that they wanted to get rid of their Jewish population (Jews had never been permitted to live in Russia proper except in very limited #s) by any means possible.

    • Replies: @Joe Schmoe
  52. Luke Lea says:

    The Jews were not significant figures in the African slave trade, but according to Paul Johnson in his History of the Jews they were major purchasers in Brazil, to which they fled after their expulsion from Portugal. They employed them on sugar plantations, which in comparisons to the conditions that existed on tobacco and cotton plantations, were generally more brutal.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  53. I’m all for classifying Jews as non-white and taking their over represntation into account for affirmative action purposes, as we do with Asians.

  54. syonredux says:

    The Jews who participated in the slave trade were abetting many anti-Semites in the South.”

    Yeah, the anti-Semitic-Antebellum-South-Myth……In point of fact, the slave-holding South was probably the least anti-Semitic section of the USA….

    On December 31, 1860, the senior senator from Louisiana rose in the Senate Chamber to defend the right of the Southern states to secede from the Union. It was the Christmas season, and the Senate galleries were thronged with a crowd in high spirits. The senator wore a simple black suit. A pocket watch with a long chain hung across his vest. He was a short portly man with black curly hair and black eyes. He was an affable and cosmopolitan man, a popular senator, a dapper dresser, an inveterate gambler whose unusual voice was “silvery [and] sweet and beautifully modulated.” He privately felt that secession would be a disaster, but in a few months he would become the Confederacy’s lawyer. Over the course of the war, he would become its spymaster.

    He spoke for more than an hour. His voice, Mrs. Jefferson Davis recalled in later years, “rose over the vast audience distinct and clear … he held his audience spellbound … so still were they that a whisper could have been heard.” He reminded his colleagues that incessant attacks upon “the feelings and sensibilities of a high-spirited people by the most insulting language and the most offensive epithets” would lead to secession. He ridiculed Republican suggestions of coercion without war.

    As he reached the end of his remarks, one hand was in his pocket, the other toying with his watch chain. “And now, senators,” he said softly, “within a few weeks we part to meet as senators in one common council chamber of the nation no more forever. We desire, we beseech you, let this parting be in peace…. What may be the fate of this horrible contest, no man can tell, none pretend to foresee; but this much I will say: the fortunes of war may be adverse to our arms; you may carry desolation into our peaceful land, and with torch and fire you may set our cities in flames … you may, under the protection of your advancing armies, give shelter to the furious fanatics who desire, and profess to desire, nothing more than to add all the horrors of a servile insurrection to the calamities of civil war; you may do all this,—and more, too, if more there be—but you never can subjugate us.”

    Here, the senator released his grasp of his watch chain, as if the chains which held the South to the Union were now severed. He put his other hand in his pocket, and as he turned to take his seat, he added, “An enslaved and servile race you can never make of us—never! never!” The whole gallery burst into uncontrollable applause so loud that the presiding officer, Sen. James M. Mason, attempted to clear the galleries. But the crowd was wild with enthusiasm.

    It was one of the most dramatic moments in the history of the U.S. Senate. The senator was Judah P. Benjamin, the brilliant lawyer from New Orleans and the first senator of acknowledged Jewish descent in American history. Benjamin was a Southerner who lived by the Southern code of honor. In 1858, he clashed with Mississippi Sen. Jefferson Davis on the floor of the Senate. Davis declared in a stage whisper that he had “no idea that he was to be met with the arguments of a paid attorney in the Senate chamber.” Benjamin challenged Davis to a duel without asking for a withdrawal or explanation. To his credit, Davis apologized publicly the next day.

    On December 31, 1860, Judah Benjamin was at the height of a remarkable career. He was married to a beautiful Louisiana Creole lady. He possessed great wealth, a successful legal practice, and the admiration of the people of Louisiana and the South. He had even declined a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. He was now about to give up everything he held dear, including the company of his beloved sisters, nieces, and nephews, to support the South, to become the Confederacy’s lawyer and counselor, the friend and ally of Jefferson Davis, and ultimately, to become the chief of espionage operations. Judah Benjamin made his choice.

    On January 5, 1861, after South Carolina had seceded, eleven influential Southern senators, including Jefferson Davis, met in Washington. Two of them, Judah Benjamin and David Levy Yulee of Florida, were Southerners of Jewish origin. Most of them had long resisted secession, but now they had all made the fateful choice. They prepared resolutions calling for the secession of the Southern states and a convention in Montgomery, Alabama, in February to create a new government.

    Judah Benjamin soon left Washington for New Orleans. He made arrangements to leave his family, his friends, his law practice, and all of his business interests. He made his last public address in New Orleans on February 22 and left for Montgomery. He would never return or see his brothers or sisters again. On February 25 he was unanimously confirmed as attorney general of the Confederacy. David Yulee stayed in Washington hoping to save the Union but also to gather information on the military situation in Florida in the event of secession. He arrived in Fernandina in early February and reported to Jefferson Davis, whom he had known for years. “Everywhere along the route I found among all classes a warm response to [your election which] has quieted concern and raised the popular heart in hopefulness. I doubt if Washington in his day had more entire hold upon public confidence.” A few weeks later he wrote Davis: “I hope you will not have occasion to take the field, but if there is a war … you have the example of Napoleon before you.”

    Abraham Charles Myers, the great-grandson of Moses Cohen, the first rabbi of Charleston, a career soldier, and a graduate of West Point, surrendered the Federal supply depot in New Orleans to the Louisiana authorities and resigned his hard-earned commission the same day. “South Carolina, the State where I was born,” his letter read, “and Louisiana, the State of my adoption, having in convention passed ordinances of secession from the United States, I am absolved from my allegiance to the Federal government.”

    “Now we of the South,” Solomon Cohen of Savannah wrote his aunt in Philadelphia, “seeing that public opinion, the law of the land in the North, is against all that we hold valuable … and that the government is about to pass into the hands of those who hate us and our institutions, feel that prudence and self-defense demand that we should protect ourselves.” Samuel Yates Levy, also from Savannah, joined the City Light Guard and was stationed on Tybee Island. His nephew, seventeen-year-old Octavus Cohen, volunteered for the Savannah Artillery. Isaac Hermann, a French immigrant, had arrived at Castle Garden in New York in 1859 and settled in Sandersville, Georgia. He joined the Washington Rifles, 1st (Ramsey’s) Georgia Infantry in June.

    Young Jewish Southerners flocked to the Confederate banner. Haiman Kaminski, from Posen, and Solomon Emanuel, also an immigrant, both now living in Georgetown, South Carolina, joined Company A, 10th South Carolina. In May, Adolph Proskauer, the son of a Prussian immigrant from Breslau, enlisted in Capt. Augustus Stikes’s company, the Independent Rifles of Mobile, Alabama, which became Company C, 12th Alabama. He was appointed first corporal. A Polish immigrant to Texas, Herschell Kempner (now called Harris Kempner), joined the Ellis County Blues, a local militia unit that eventually became Company H of William H. Parsons’s 12th Texas Cavalry. Lewis Leon, a recent immigrant from Germany, left his parents’ home on Norfolk Street on the lower east side of New York City in 1858 at the age of seventeen. He settled in Charlotte, North Carolina, and when the war came he enlisted in the Charlotte Grays, 1st North Carolina Volunteers. Eugene Henry Levy of New Orleans enlisted as a private in Dreux’s Battery. Two of his brothers, Joseph Calhoun and Julian, also volunteered.

    When the Richmond Light Infantry Blues left the capital of Virginia for battle in April 1861, fifteen of its ninety-nine members were Jews, including Ezekiel (“Zeke”) J. Levy, its fourth sergeant. There was a Jewish contingent in the Richmond Grays. Myer Angle, the president of Beth Ahabah, the German synagogue, eventually had six sons in the Confederate army. Recent German Jewish immigrants from all over Virginia enlisted: Max Guggenheimer Jr. of Lynchburg, a native of Hurben, Bavaria, in the 11th Virginia; Aaron and Isadore Reinach of Petersburg in the 12th Virginia; and Leopold and Sampson Levy, natives of Altenstadt, Bavaria, in the 1st Virginia Cavalry. Fellow Bavarian Emanuel Gerst of Halifax County joined the 6th Virginia Cavalry.

    Thus, overwhelmingly, almost unanimously, some with fear and trepidation, others with courage and enthusiasm, some with reservations, others with a firm unflinching resolve, Southern Jewry cast its lot with the Confederate States of America. Many, like “Ike” Hermann, had found the land of Canaan. Others, like Gustavus Poznanski, had found their Jerusalem, their Palestine. Still others, like Marcus Baum, Jacob Samuels, Adolph Proskauer, and Herschell Kempner, had finally found their fatherland.

    When in March 1865 Eugenia Levy Phillips’s brother, Capt. Samuel Yates Levy, wrote his father from Johnson’s Island, a Union prisoner of war camp, he spoke from his heart: “I long to breathe the free air of Dixie.”

    http://movies2.nytimes.com/books/first/r/rosen-confederates.html

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Anonymous
  55. @AnotherDad

    But American Jews trying to pull that “we are oppressed” stuff is just a laugher. It seems to be a core part of Jewish identity … so they keep trotting it out.

    Has it ever not worked?

  56. densa says:

    I’m all about holding whiteness accountable…

    [White] Fendlay [idiot] actually believes this?

    and

    “White people are to blame for the suffering of African Americans….” Luckily they have Sorry-White St. Fendlay to atone for history! Oops, Sorry-White superhero just stepped in it by assuming that whiteness taints, Jews, too.

    These people really are insane.

  57. syonredux says:
    @Luke Lea

    The Jews were not significant figures in the African slave trade, but according to Paul Johnson in his History of the Jews they were major purchasers in Brazil, to which they fled after their expulsion from Portugal. They employed them on sugar plantations, which in comparisons to the conditions that existed on tobacco and cotton plantations, were generally more brutal.

    My understanding is that Conversos did play a disproportionate role in the Atlantic Slave Trade during the period when the Portuguese dominated the business…..

    • Replies: @syonredux
  58. @The Alarmist

    Less likely than global climate change.

  59. What’s funny is how the whole story nicely illustrates Ann Coulter’s point about how the only thing intersectionalists can come together over is hating the White Man.

    Or protecting him. Did you know that the security people had orders to keep Paula, Kathleen, and Juanita from attending that second debate?

    Even though they had tickets.

    They should have barged in.

  60. @syonredux

    “seeing that public opinion, the law of the land in the North, is against all that we hold valuable … “

    I.e., Negroes.

    • LOL: AndrewR
  61. Truth says:

    What’s funny is how the whole story nicely illustrates Ann Coulter’s point about how the only thing intersectionalists can come together over is hating the White Man.

    Well, I mean, to be perfectly fair, there really only seems to be one thing that Unzistas have in common…

  62. Would y’ say the fringe was made a’ silk?

    Wouldn’t have n’ other kind but silk.

  63. syonredux says:
    @syonredux

    For many American Jews today, particularly those descended from immigrants coming through Northeast corridors in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the idea that Confederate Jews fought on the side of slavery offends their entire worldview, rooted so deeply in social justice. Even the idea of there being so many Jews in the American South, decades before Ellis Island opened its gates, is a strange idea.

    But just as Robert E. Lee, an Army officer for 32 years, sided with his home state of Virginia against the federal government, many Jews found a homeland in Dixie over the centuries and decided they could not take up arms against it. To them, after all they’d suffered and fled throughout the ages, the South was their new motherland, the land of milk and honey (and cotton), and it was worth fighting for. “This land has been good to all of us,” one Jewish-German Southerner wrote. “I shall fight to my last breath.”

    In 1800, Charleston, S.C. — whose 1790 state constitution guaranteed freedom of religion — was home to the largest Jewish community in America; by 1861, a third of all Jews in the South resided in Louisiana.

    While the South, like everywhere else, did exhibit anti-Semitism, many Southern Jews felt the North was more deeply anti-Semitic. Popular Northern newspapers denigrated Jews; Harper’s Weekly said that all Jews were secessionists, copperheads and rebels. Other papers blamed the Jews for destroying the national credit. Union general Ulysses S. Grant exhibited the greatest bigotry of all when he issued General Orders No. 11 in December 1862, “the most sweeping anti-Jewish regulation in all of American history,” according to Rabbi Bertram W. Korn. The orders called for the expulsion of all Jews within 24 hours from Grant’s territory at the time, which included parts of Kentucky, Tennessee and Mississippi.

    Still, the idea of Jews fighting or rooting for the South is bewildering to many Jews today, especially those descended from Russian Socialists who came to America with ideas of class and economic equality and who identified with blacks and other excluded groups. According to Rabbi Sussman, the Civil War was the turning point for Jews in coming to see that slavery was wrong and based in racism, and the experience put the modern American Jew on a path of advocating for and supporting civil rights and empowerment for all people. “For thousands of years of history, nobody believed that valuing a human being as a commodity was inherently wrong,” he said.

    The Passover narrative, he adds, didn’t become an abolitionist-related story until after World War II and the Civil Rights era. “Originally, Passover was theological. It’s about redemption and the power of God. It’s not really about setting human beings free in a universal way. The text says that God frees the Hebrew slaves because God loves the Hebrews. God doesn’t free all slaves for all of humanity or send Moses out to become the William Lloyd Garrison of the ancient free world.”

    On Aug. 23, 1861, Rabbi Max Michelbacher of Richmond, Va., who wrote a “Prayer for the Confederacy,” which was distributed to all Jewish Confederate soldiers, asked General Lee to grant a furlough for the Jewish soldiers to attend synagogue for the High Holy Days. Because of the exigencies of war, Lee declined, but his response to Michelbacher eloquently illustrates the way that ecumenical regionalism overshadowed any sense of religious difference between the two men: “I feel assured that neither you or any member of the Jewish congregation would wish to jeopardize a cause you have so much at heart.” In closing, he added: “That your prayers for the success & welfare of our Cause may be granted by the Great Ruler of the universe is my ardent wish.”

    https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/passover-in-the-confederacy/

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  64. @Lot

    It works for her: she actually looks like a woman trying to pass as a man trying to pass as a woman;-)

    • LOL: Harry Baldwin
  65. When some jerk killed Perez’ sister, her father would not press charges. She studied “Chicana Feminism” and psychology at the University of Mexinchifornia in Santa Cruz, where she participated in something called the “Rainbow Theatre.”

    That’s all you need to know about this creature, really.

  66. Miss Brzezinski is driven to apologize for calling Mr Pompeo a “butt-boy”.

    Note, though, that her apology was not directed to Mr Pompeo!

    Cue the dumb blonde jokes…

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mika-brzezinski-apology-pompeo-butt-boy_us_5c13af34e4b0539b3213f6da

    Are you going to Scarborough fair…

  67. @syonredux

    Jews in Mississippi were assured that the saltire on the Confederate battle flag was not meant to be St Andrew’s Cross.

    If the reassurers were being honest, then that leaves Hawaii, and perhaps Maryland, as the only states with Christian symbolism on their flags.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @syonredux
  68. @Jack D

    Agreed. With your comment–other than the “delusional” part.

    But that’s my point. Historically, the typical Jew was doing middle man minority stuff and was “rich”–relative to the typical gentile. (No one back then seems particularly “rich” by our standards. Even the Kings with their castles who got to order everyone around, didn’t have our central heating, flush toilets, SUVs with heated leather seats or cheap air travel.) Sufficiently “rich” that–exactly as you note–a few centuries back, in the East, their higher fertility was sufficient to flat out overflow their middleman minority niches and impoverish large numbers of them. (Cue Malthus.) In the West, the smaller numbers who had returned after explusion were not under such Mathusian pressure and were still “rich”.

    My point here, is European Jews were simply not in the position of blacks in the US–at the socio-economic bottom. The shtetl, Fiddler on the Roof style situation occurred precisely because the Jews had been historically much better off than the typical gentile and ergo had a much larger population expansion.

    Rather the position of the Jews in Europe is much more like other middle man minorites–like say the overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia. But super-charged by Jewish religous separatism and hostility to Christianity. So the Christian peasantry/craftsmen are getting hustled by Jewish traders, lenders, whom they know will not contribute to whatever public efforts (building the Cathederal, holding a fair, etc.), know they will never be part of their community, and know they hold Christians in contempt. The middle man minority divide is not just “there”, but is ideological–a rejection of Christian universalism–and eternal.

    No one likes to get taken advantage of–human nature. But it’s much more tolerable if you are taken advantage of, by your own kind. If the sharp merchant, trader, banker’s is kicking back into tyour community, your church and if maybe his son might marry your cute daughter–or at least somewhere down the road. In other words if you are fundamentally in the same community.

    ~~~

    But again my point isn’t complicated. There’s been a lot of Jewish propaganda in the US to liken their suffering to blacks, to paint themselves as allies of the oppressed, to pretend European Jews were like Martin Luther King just waiting for the gentiles to “judge them by the content of their character”. It’s nonsense. Two very different experiences.

    To boil it down to single sentences:

    In the US, the blacks were separate from whites, because whites did not think much of blacks and refused to integrate with them.

    In Europe, the Jews were separate from gentiles, because Jews did not think much of gentiles and refused to integrate with them.

    • Replies: @snorlax
  69. @Reg Cæsar

    California’s many cities with Catholic names don’t seem to reflect that in their flags. Los Angeles County had its seal’s cross removed, but at least that was replaced with a Spanish mission.

    https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us-camun.html
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_of_Los_Angeles_County,_California

    West Hollywood’s flag appears to have been designed by a member of the Pink Pistols:

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
  70. No one likes to get taken advantage of–human nature. But it’s much more tolerable if you are taken advantage of, by your own kind. If the sharp merchant, trader, banker’s is kicking back into tyour community, your church and if maybe his son might marry your cute daughter–or at least somewhere down the road. In other words if you are fundamentally in the same community.

    The corrupt governments of Mexico, and indeed all Latin America, still have sensible immigration policies. Changing that would be a betrayal too far.

  71. syonredux says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    The flag that Miles had favored when he was chairman of the “Committee on the Flag and Seal” eventually became the battle flag and, ultimately, the most popular flag of the Confederacy. According to Museum of the Confederacy Director John Coski, Miles’ design was inspired by one of the many “secessionist flags” flown at the South Carolina secession convention in Charleston of December 1860. That flag was a blue St George’s Cross (an upright or Latin cross) on a red field, with 15 white stars on the cross, representing the slaveholding states,[38][39] and, on the red field, palmetto and crescent symbols. Miles received a variety of feedback on this design, including a critique from Charles Moise, a self-described “Southerner of Jewish persuasion.” Moise liked the design but asked that “…the symbol of a particular religion not be made the symbol of the nation.” Taking this into account, Miles changed his flag, removing the palmetto and crescent, and substituting a heraldic saltire (“X”) for the upright cross. The number of stars was changed several times as well. He described these changes and his reasons for making them in early 1861. The diagonal cross was preferable, he wrote, because “it avoided the religious objection about the cross (from the Jews and many Protestant sects), because it did not stand out so conspicuously as if the cross had been placed upright thus.” He also argued that the diagonal cross was “more Heraldric [sic] than Ecclesiastical, it being the ‘saltire’ of Heraldry, and significant of strength and progress.”[40]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America#Battle_flag

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  72. anon[115] • Disclaimer says:

    National Review had an article on this recently:
    https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/womens-march-anti-semitism-identity-politics/

    According to the report, several of the women who now formally lead the Women’s March met for the first time in November 2016 in New York City. At that meeting, two of them, Carmen Perez and Tamika Mallory, “allegedly first asserted that Jewish people bore a special collective responsibility as exploiters of black and brown people — and even, according to a close secondhand source, claimed that Jews were proven to have been leaders of the American slave trade.”

    Meanwhile, former Women’s March co-chair Evvie Harmon told Tablet that a meeting of the group’s leadership after the successful January 2017 March on Washington quickly turned in a similar direction:

    Tamika told us that the problem was that there were five white women in the room and only three women of color, and that she didn’t trust white women. Especially white women from the South. At that point, I kind of tuned out because I was so used to hearing this type of talk from Tamika. . . . I suddenly realized that Tamika and Carmen were facing Vanessa [Wruble, another co-chair], who was sitting on a couch, and berating her — but it wasn’t about her being white. It was about her being Jewish. “Your people this, your people that.” I was raised in the South and the language that was used is language that I’m very used to hearing in rural South Carolina. Just instead of against black people, against Jewish people. They even said to her “your people hold all the wealth.” You could hear a pin drop. It was awful.”

    Jewesses thought they could easily manipulate the blacks and browns, turns out these women not only know about America’s best kept secret, and aren’t afraid to touch the third rail, how annoying!

    • Replies: @Anon
  73. “I, too, want to fight the systems that uphold white and male privilege. But right now we are being pitted against one another…”

    Damnit! That was NOT the plan!

    This is hilarious. The Jewish plan of “Let’s you and him fight” has hit a snag. Newsflash, Jewgirl, not only are you seen as White, you’re also rich, which means you are an ‘Uber White.’ Like it or not, this time around you’re in the White Boat; you may want to stop drilling holes in the hull.

    • LOL: ben tillman
  74. Roger says:

    So Jews might lose their grip on the feminist movement? I started to say this might be a good thing, but the replacements are probably crazier women.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  75. @PiltdownMan

    Loony ideology is never a good idea. But looniness aside, the Nation of Islam is good for blacks.

    More or less on the grounds, that Sailer mentioned in reference to Katrina, which got him in trouble with the goodthinkers. People who don’t have a lot of natural smarts and self-discipline benefit much, much more from having an external (religious or social) discipline and orderly/productive life path imposed on them.

    Of course, blacks would be much better off having this done by the black church. But the breakdown has been so total that the black church has had to accomodate the core vice–promiscuity, single momery.

    In contrast the NOI is much more ideologically “male”, patriarchial and “hard” about sexual behavior and, of course, drugs. Most blacks have a much better chance of making a useful life out of their natural endowments, having something akin to the Nation of Islam program steering them.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon, dfordoom
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Anon
  76. njguy73 says:
    @Whiskey

    Cannot swords be turned to plowshares? Can we and all nations not live in peace? In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity…Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond…I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. And yet, I ask you, is not an alien force already among us? What could be more alien to the universal aspirations of our peoples than war and the threat of war?

    President Ronald Reagan, Sept. 21, 1987, United Nations General Assembly

    http://www.cultureready.org/blog/reagans-1987-un-speech-alien-threat-resonates-now

    • Replies: @Simply Simon
  77. anon[115] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Same here. Farrakhan is actually a smart guy and knows how to think for himself, Jews don’t like that. They like their puppets to dress well, speak well but totally mindless, like Obama, even better if morally bankrupt so it’s easy for them to get dirt on him, like MLK.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  78. @Reg Cæsar

    I’d like to teach you c–ts a little sayin’,
    And larn the words by heart the way you should:
    White men ain’t no better than anybody else,
    But I be danged if they ain’t just as good!

  79. @syonredux

    Call the ACLU:

    As a side note, Maryland is the only state that has a law on its books related to etiquette and the proper way to display the state flag. That statute includes the criteria that only finial that can be attached to the top of a flagpole that flies the Maryland state flag is a gold cross bottony.
    https://www.flagpolesetc.com/blog/maryland-state-flag-history

  80. @AnotherDad

    Loony ideology is never a good idea. But looniness aside, the Nation of Islam is good for blacks.

    Steve himself once noted that hate was an effective tool in encouraging order and discipline.

  81. anon[115] • Disclaimer says:

    All that hard work the Jews put into this women’s march, not just starting it, organizing it, but funding it all (George Soros), all done by Jews. Did these ungrateful black-brown-Muslim parasites think they could’ve gotten things going on their own?

    Alas, after 5 freaking decades of hard work, we’re back to square one:

    Nobody loves the Jews.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Anon
  82. snorlax says:
    @AnotherDad

    To be fair, given National Geographic’s figures for Jewish admixture, it’s clear that over time the majority did integrate, in every sense of the term.

    95 Ashenazi
    14 Lebanese
    6 Polish
    5 German, Iberian (Portuguese/Spanish), Romanian, Russian
    4 Czech, Egyptian, Mexican (Western US)
    3 French, Sardinian
    2 English, Georgian, Greek, Northern Caucasian (Abkhaz/Dagestani), Peruvian (Lima), Tuscan, Western (dot) Indian
    0 (>50% European only) Argentine, Bulgar, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, Greenland Inuit, Irish, Norwegian, Puerto Rican, Scots, Tatar

  83. anon[115] • Disclaimer says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    I wouldn’t worry too much about it being a ‘permanent fixture’. Women’s march will eventually fall apart like BLM and all those other leftist organizations. They’re already starting to unravel.

    Leftists can’t plan or lead if their lives depend on it. They’re just not very bright, that’s why they’re leftists.

  84. snorlax says:
    @Lot

    If your husband glued his pubes to his neck, you too would change your name to “Bob” and dress like a prison guard in a no-budget porno.

  85. tyrone says:
    @Whiskey

    China’s not “our” enemy ….let’s fight “our” real enemy for a change.

    • Replies: @Anon
  86. @snorlax

    What’s with Mexican Americans being 4% Jewish? That’s up there with Eastern Europe and Germany. Are there that many Jews in Mexico or were the Spanish who settled in Mexico particularly Jewish?

    • Replies: @snorlax
    , @ben tillman
  87. Abe says: • Website
    @Emblematic

    But what about the truth or untruth of the claim? Were Jews over-represented among the merchants who practised slave trading?

    Regardless of relative representation, it demolishes the whole “as a formerly-enslaved people ourselves, we have an especially strong sense of ethical obligation…”. This of course also ignores (and Farrakhan is both too dumb and too wedded to Islam as a revenge vehicle against YT to notice it too is basically a white guy* run show) that Sephardic Jews had an almost 900 year headstart in the slave game before the question of their responsibility for the New World version of it even comes into the picture.

    * or close enough in the grand historical scheme of things

  88. snorlax says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Probably a combination of

    • The 5% among Iberians.
    • In the colonies, you get to be a peninsular and nobody knows you’re a converso.
    • Later Jewish immigration to Mexico (e.g. Louis C.K.’s family).
    • Lots of Jews in Los Angeles.

  89. Lot says:
    @snorlax

    Thanks for compiling these figures from that article.

    Teasing out an estimate here: the Spanish men who sired the mestizo races might have been about 10% Jewish by blood on average.

    If modern Iberians are 5%, and we know conversos were long thought to be more likely to settle the new world, 10% estimate seems legit. The Mexican-American estimate of 4% Jewish and 67% Indian suggests their white ancestors were about 12% Jewish.

    These numbers might seem high, but reliable Roman sources suggest that before the Jewish Wars, they were the 2nd largest ethnic group in the Eastern Mediterranean behind Greeks.

    • Replies: @syonredux
    , @Reg Cæsar
  90. anon[664] • Disclaimer says:

    “And it’s why we need a good long hard war against China.”

    I hope you weren’t being serious. Any war with the Chinese would hurt the US far more than China. If the US picked and then lost a war with China, especially if its military were either badly humiliated or refused to fight, then the repercussions would be extraordinary. It would almost certainly end the US’s image of invincibility and presage the dawn of a new age just as much as Japan’s victory over Russia in the early 1900s predicted the end of European full spectrum dominance. And that’s a best case scenario. A badly humiliated US could escalate the conflict to a nuclear exchange in order to save face.

    Not only will the American public not tolerate large losses in this social media age, but white males (the backbone of the US officer corps) could possibly even defect and refuse to fight should it get really bad; why the hell would white guys sacrifice themselves for this racist country that has stolen their homes and futures and has spent every year since 9/11 attacking them? Don’t believe me? Check the origins of the Trump phenomenon. Probably a third of his base are anti-war whites sick of Middle Eastern commitments. That’s how he got away with mocking McCain and denouncing the Iraq War.

    China is far stronger and far more unified than you realize. I think they could sustain a war much longer and much harder than anything the US could tolerate these days. Just as WWII led to American empire and German domination, WWIII could easily lead to a Chinese-led world order and a decimated, permanently destroyed USA – completely plausible when you consider the demographics of this country. The US should avoid a conflict with China at all costs if it wants to limp into the next century as a semi-coherent political entity (doubtful as it is).

    “Z-Man”

    I wish he would publish his articles here. His comment system is lacking and often blocks commenters using anonymization software on strict security settings. There was a debate in the comment section on his blog recently that I would have loved to have participated in, but no dice.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  91. syonredux says:
    @Lot

    These numbers might seem high, but reliable Roman sources suggest that before the Jewish Wars, they were the 2nd largest ethnic group in the Eastern Mediterranean behind Greeks.

    Those numbers are actually highly unreliable…..

    Everyone now and then you see someone say that Jews made up 10% of the population of the Roman Empire. If you dig deeper, you find that this is based upon the Claudian Census – or, more exactly, upon something Bar Hebraeus said about that census, since we don’t actually have the census. Bar Hebraeus was a bishop of the Syrian Orthodox Church who lived between 1226 and 1286 AD. He wrote “At the same time Claudius Caesar ordered the Jews to be counted, and their number was 6,944,000 men.”

    On historical details that can be checked, Bar Hebraeus is highly inaccurate. One more thing: St. Jerome mentioned a report by Eusebius on Claudius’s census of Roman citizens: ” there were found to be of Roman citizens 6,944,000. ” Interesting coincidence.

    Romans routinely counted the number of Roman citizens, and that number is reasonably consistent with earlier numbers from census records that have survived. It is not so obvious why the Romans would do a head count of Jews.

    In other words, Bar Hebraeus screwed up. Those who have based their arguments upon him have screwed up as well.

    So how many Jews were there in the Roman Empire? What fraction were they of the population? Nobody knows. We have possibly-ok estimates for Rome at certain points in time. Two comments by Josephus suggest 4-8 thousand – if you believe him – and one by Tacitus mentioned 4,000. That may mean adult males only: 8 thousand adult males would imply a total population of something like 40,000 in Rome. Or maybe not. There were certainly Jews in classical Rome, enough to sustain a number of synagogues, including a Samaritan synagogue.

    Philo says that there were 1,000,000 Jews in Egypt. Not hardly: they mostly seem to have lived in Alexandria, where they maybe made up a third of the population -out of a total of perhaps half a million? Our estimates of the population of Classical cities are also extremely uncertain.

    https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/jews-in-the-roman-empire/

    • Replies: @snorlax
    , @Lot
  92. @Dave Pinsen

    A conundrum the ultra liberal mayor and city council members find themselves in Austin TX. After it was voted to change the names of schools and streets of persons having connections with the Confederacy it soon became apparent that even the city’s name was suspect. Where does it all end? It doesn’t.

    • Replies: @snorlax
    , @Reg Cæsar
  93. snorlax says:
    @syonredux

    *A.D. 1226 and 1286

    • Replies: @syonredux
  94. snorlax says:
    @Simply Simon

    And Yale and Brown’s namesakes were slave traders.

    • Replies: @Simply Simon
    , @Reg Cæsar
  95. @njguy73

    Reagan’s speech was all pap for the UN crowd. He knew that conflict was the inherent nature of the human beast. Only the loftiest of idealists believe otherwise.

  96. @snorlax

    They have weaved a rather tangled web–no easy way out.

  97. @anon

    Did these ungrateful black-brown-Muslim parasites think they could’ve gotten things going on their own?

    The Million Man March at least looked like a million men, even if it fell short. The Million Moms March was a small fraction of that.

    Don’t ask the National Park Service to verify the numbers. They washed their hands of it ages ago, and rightfully so.

  98. Speaking of trouble in Fringefräulein Sturmbrigade Paradise, your favorite Titanium Blonde is out of jail, Uncle Sailer…

    And she is more righteous than ever:

    “The permanent suspension only lasted for a day, but the experience was traumatic and lasting.

    I now understand how Nelson Mandela felt.”

    https://quillette.com/2018/12/13/i-now-understand-how-nelson-mandela-felt/

  99. @snorlax

    A conundrum the ultra liberal mayor and city council members find themselves in Austin TX. After it was voted to change the names of schools and streets of persons having connections with the Confederacy it soon became apparent that even the city’s name was suspect. Where does it all end? It doesn’t.

    And Yale and Brown’s namesakes were slave traders.

    The jewel of the City of Lakes:

    Bde Maka Ska

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    “Lake Calhoun” redirects here.

    “…particularly as white people.” Isn’t that precious? However, the other Lake Calhoun is safe, for now:

    Lake Calhoun is a lake in Kandiyohi County, in the U.S. state of Minnesota.[1] It was named for a local cattleman.[2]

    Well, almost safe…

    In 2015, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources announced the lake has an invasive species infestation of zebra mussels.[3]

  100. syonredux says:
    @snorlax

    *A.D. 1226 and 1286

    Yep. And yet some people actually think that his figures are reliable…..

  101. Anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Better questions :

    Why do Muslim women support the death penalty for converting to Christianity in 14 Muslim countries ?

    Why do Muslim women support the death penalty for being a homosexual in 14 Muslim countries ?

    Why do Muslim women support owning black people as slaves in 8 Muslim countries ?

    Why do Muslim women stridently support occupation and genocide and ethnic cleansing in occupied Western Sahara , Papua , Biafra ,Cyprus , Darfur and Kurdistan?

    Why do Muslim women support bloody jihad insurgencies in Buddhist Thailand and Myanmar,Christian Philippines, Christian Serbia , Atheist Xinyang?

    Why do Muslim women support Muslim invasion and terrorism in the West ?

  102. @Lot

    She’s a somewhat mannish face, particularly the jaw, though she does seem to have breasts.

    I wonder if her husband her have some kind of weird sex in groups or just boff other people separately. I always wonder exactly how any ignorant these bisexual or otherwise abnormal persons who purport to be in ostensibly monogamous (or, anyhow, committed) relationships address their desire for relations with the gender opposite their mate’s. I expect it’s been discussed and studied, but I am loathe to investigate that rabbit-hole for all the insanity I would have to wade through.

  103. @Lot

    Teasing out an estimate here: the Spanish men who sired the mestizo races might have been about 10% Jewish by blood on average.

    They must have a lot of Arab blood as well, considering how long their peninsula was occupied.

    Note that Spanish is the only language in Christendom in which “Jesus” is a common given name. That can only come from the Mohammedans. Other Christians would find it blasphemous.

    • Replies: @Lot
    , @snorlax
  104. Anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emblematic

    Easier to look at who never stopped trading in slaves to find your answer.

    Hint : Modern slave capitals
    Islamic republic of Sudan
    Islamic republic of Mauritania
    Islamic republic of Somalia
    99.9 % Muslim Libya
    99% Muslim Niger
    Muslim majority North Nigeria
    Syria under the Islamic state
    Iraq under the Islamic state

    Saudi and gulf states and Lebanon stopped overt slavery only in the 1970s however defacto slavery exists with domestic servants stripped of their passports and human rights upon arrival.

  105. Jack D says:
    @Roger

    Don’t know about crazier, but dumber for sure. Any time your replace Jewish with black or brown, chances are very high you are moving in the direction of dumber.

    Whether a dumber feminist movement is good or bad for the rest of us is another question. Personally I keep waiting for the day when Jews feel they are no longer welcome in the Democrat Party or the feminist movement and switch en masse to Republican. This will happen the minute that blacks and browns truly run the party and the movement. This has already happened in the UK with Labor and the Conservatives.

    There are some people here who hate the Jews no matter what, but I think that there are others who wouldn’t hate them (as much) if they felt like the Jews were on Team White instead of trying to take down Team White.

    • Replies: @Marty T
  106. Lot says:
    @syonredux

    Numbers may be dubious, but they were a large minority in many different places and a majority in Palestine and possibly Syria and Cyprus.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  107. CJ says:
    @Svigor

    … I’m all about holding whiteness accountable—regardless of the religion of the white person.”

    I love this line too. I’m waiting for a chance to use it.

  108. @Jack D

    This conformity is well known and studied, and it is indeed bioevolutinary. It’s to do with being valuable to successful invaders, who murder (or, at best, enslave) the conquered males but will mate with the conquered females for obvious reasons. If the females resist or are otherwise too troublesome, they too wind up dead or maltreated, but by making nice with the triumphant males they can wind up carrying on quite nicely themselves.

    It’s a hallmark of the modern horror show that this phenomenon has become almost universal. Time was the occasional noble woman would exhibit loyalty at least until the war’s outcome was final, and perhaps even then refuse submission, opting for flight, suicide, or at best a resentful and begrudging submission. Now European females almost universally clamour to not merely stand by but to proactively assist strangers in destroying European men. They are all Grace from Farnham’s Freehold rather than Morwen from The Children of Húrin. It’s contemptible, really.

    It’s the stuff Whisky is always on about, in his more direct way.

  109. Anon[104] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Farrakhan is actually a smart guy and knows how to think for himself, Jews don’t like that.

    But he has a diabolical soul.

  110. Lot says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    I doubt the Spanish have much Arabian blood. Arabized North Africans, maybe.

    Some Muslims dissenter groups fled to Spain, but otherwise I don’t think there was much ME settlement in a very distant place with hostile locals and a different language. Later on Grenada got a bit crowded for ME Arabs to want to settle.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
  111. Anon[104] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Nobody loves the Jews.

    Most non-Muslims and non-blacks love Jews.

    Also, successful Muslims and blacks have to love Jews. Lots of prizes if you do: Oprah and Obama.

  112. JLK says:
    @PTT

    Be vocal, and be visible as a Jew.

  113. Anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Yes Farrakhan is one smart cookie. He believes white people were created in a test tube by the evil scientist Yakup who lives in a space shuttle that constantly circles earth !!!

    And he loves black people so much, he has been living in a 99% white area for the past 40 years .

  114. snorlax says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Note that Spanish is the only language in Christendom in which “Jesus” is a common given name. That can only come from the Mohammedans. Other Christians would find it blasphemous.

    It’s a common name in English and every other European language.

    Hebrew: Yeshua➡️Greek: Iesous➡️Latin: Iesus➡️Spanish: Jesús
    Hebrew: Yeshua➡️Greek: Iesous➡️Latin: Iesus➡️French: Jésus➡️English: Jesus
    Hebrew: Yeshua➡️English: Joshua
    Hebrew: Yeshua➡️Spanish: Josué

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  115. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    “Of course, nowhere in the Koran do you find an explicit condemnation of the institution of slavery, in fact one can discern the tacit acceptance and approval.”

    Just like the Bible and Torah.

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @syonredux
    , @Anonymous
  116. Anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @tyrone

    Good to know that a country flooding our borders with Fentanyl and killing 40,000 mostly white child bearing age people per year is not our enemy. I wonder sometimes if these type of posters are not Chinese agents riling up white nationalist cucks with talk about Jews as a subterfuge to hide the real threat (China).

  117. syonredux says:
    @Lot

    Numbers may be dubious, but they were a large minority in many different places

    Again, we don’t have good figures….And how “large” does a group have to be to count as a “large minority?”

    and a majority in Palestine and possibly Syria and Cyprus.

    Palestine, sure (although there were substantial numbers of non-Jews)….

  118. syonredux says:
    @Corvinus

    “Of course, nowhere in the Koran do you find an explicit condemnation of the institution of slavery, in fact one can discern the tacit acceptance and approval.”

    Just like the Bible and Torah.

    Christian Bible and Tanakh

  119. @snorlax

    “Joshua” doesn’t count. It’s one of those names found in both the Old and New Testaments, and which differ in some languages but not in others. E.g., Miriam/Mary, Jacob/James.

    When English-speakers give their child a name from one Testament, they mean to honor that person, not the one in the other. One of my brothers-in-law is a Joshua, and they sure weren’t intending to call him Jesus.

    Show me a list from anywhere in Christendom (save Hispanophone lands) in which the local form of Jesus is in the top 100 names for boys.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Anon
  120. snorlax says:
    @PTT

    You can’t, beyond calling them on their BS at every opportunity where it wouldn’t end up in everyone else at the table piling on against you or seriously harm an important friendship or professional relationship.

    But you can do your part to put a different face forward by befriending gentile Trump supporters IRL. Suggestion: Join a gun club.

    • Replies: @PTT
  121. I was reading about this for entertainment rather than comprehension.

    Something went by about how the two women of color who managed to get control of the whole thing were proposing that they should be paid two percent of all the money collected.

    That could be quite a bit of money.

    …why is it that every damned prejudice I have keeps getting confirmed? It’s almost tedious.

  122. @Reg Cæsar

    ‘“Joshua” doesn’t count. It’s one of those names found in both the Old and New Testaments, and which differ in some languages but not in others. E.g., Miriam/Mary, Jacob/James…’

    ‘Josh’ is a tediously common name for the children of Zionist Jews. Mighty warrior for Jahweh, brave butcher of all gentiles, uber-Jew…one can see why they pick it.

    I remember the funniest damned thing. My son is half-Hispanic, 6′ 2″, and generally trying to decide between 2o0 and 250 lbs — think Tuco from ‘Breaking Bad.’ He’s actually pretty nice, and — thank God — not a bully, but…

    So anyway, we and about two other people are demonstrating across the street from some ‘Israel Day’ celebration in San Francisco, being firmly watched by the police. One of the other two people is this sweet little old lady of the circa sixty five persuasion — accent on the little. Some family comes by and the college age son starts arguing with the little old lady — being very physically aggressive and intimidating. A mighty warrior for Jahweh — intimidating hell out of little old ladies.

    My son blows up, and goes storming over to the guy. I forget the exact words, but the text is something from ‘pick on someone your own size.’

    That guy is just about shitting. Then his dad saves him. ‘Come on, Josh.’

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Marty T
  123. JackOH says:

    We’ve been talking Coalition of the Fringes vs. Majority, right?

    Several comments here sort of suggest an alternative formula for classifying what plagues us:

    “Historicists”, who seek political advantage and electoral success by primarily fronting real or alleged grievances they claim to suffer or have suffered, vs. the coalition of “Modernists” and “Futurists”, which would be us.

    Imagine a talk show slugfest in which a Leftist rant is dismissed calmly and firmly by one of our team: “My opponent is a card-carrying Historicist who believes the way forward in America is to keep looking backward. That doesn’t make sense, does it?”

    Top of the head thought.

  124. HA says:
    @Emblematic

    “>But what about the truth or untruth of the claim?”

    The standard line is that Jews participated in the trans-Atlantic slave about as much, per capita, as white gentiles did (though as Luke Lea and others have noted they did play key roles at some points). The fact that Farrakhan and others like spend enormous amounts of effort to dispute the standard line is no surprise.

    What’s more surprising is that this back-and-forth on Jewish participation in the African slave trade seems to have obliterated the undisputed but rarely mentioned fact that Jews were greatly over-represented in the slave trade of Europeans. I’m genuinely puzzled as to why more isn’t made of this amidst all the hand-wringing over what white people collectively owe to blacks for their enslavement. (I mean, I understand why the mainstream media overlooks it, but given how well documented and uncontroversial this is, I’m puzzled why even those who hate Jews seem to ignore the topic, and instead prefer to obsess over crazy conspiracy theories and holocaust denial.)

    Indeed, if I recall correctly, Ariel Toaff surmised that gentile fears of “bloodsucking Jews” owed more to their prominence in the abductions related to the slave trade than to actual cases of Jewish abducting and killing Christian children for blood rituals (though he admitted — to much ensuing uproar — that that, too, might have happened a few times, so that the point about slavery was, once again, overshadowed by other controversy).

    Records of long-distance Jewish slave merchants date at least as far back as 492, when Pope Gelasius permitted Jews to import non-Christian slaves into Italy, at the request of a Jewish friend from Telesina. By the turn of the 6th to the 7th century, Jews had become the chief slave traders in Italy, and were active in Gaelic territories. Pope Gregory the Great issued a ban on Jews possessing Christian slaves, lest the slaves convert to Judaism [and so they shifted their attention to pagan Slavs] By the 9th and 10th centuries, Jewish merchants, sometimes called Radhanites, were a major force in the slave trade continent-wide. Jews were one of the few groups who could move and trade between the Christian and Islamic worlds….As German rulers of Saxon dynasties took over the enslavement (and slave trade) of Slavs in the 10th century, Jewish merchants bought slaves at the Elbe, sending caravans into the valley of the Rhine…Many would be castrated and sold as eunuchs as well…The Jewish population of Crimea was a very important factor in the trade in slaves and captives of the Crimean Khanate (Tatars) in the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries….Jews would later become highly influential in the European slave trade, reaching their apex from the 16th to 19th centuries.

    • Replies: @Anon
  125. The aim of the Coalition of the Fringes isn’t to destroy white males, it’s to destroy white middle and working class whites males. If its aim was to destroy all white males then rich white males wouldn’t be funding it.

    Why do so few white males refuse to address this question. Why do rich white males fund anti-white causes?

  126. Anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    Ill take ‘things that never happened” for $200 ,Alex.

    Did you ever protest at a Chinese festival ?(occupying and ethnic cleansing in Tibet and Xinyang {Gasp killing Muslims too !!!})

    Turkish festival (occupying and ethnically cleansing Cyprus and Kurdistan )

    How about a Russian one ( occupying Kaliningrad, Chechnya zomg and killing innocent Muslims Omg , Dagestan , Crimea)

    How about protesting an Islamic festival , after all at least 14 islamic states sanction slavery , killing people who convert to Christianity, gender apartheid , and state sanctioned killing of homosexuals , not to mention involved in brutal occupations and genocides. And all other Muslim states stridently support them , as well as many being democracies such as Pakistan and Indonesia where citizens enthusiastically vited for such laws.

    And what do they all have in common 100x more killing than Israel has done and occupyong 100x more land than Israel. Hmmmm wonder why you wouldn’t be adamant about protesting them , humanitarian soul that you are.

  127. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Jewesses thought they could easily manipulate the blacks and browns, turns out these women not only know about America’s best kept secret, and aren’t afraid to touch the third rail, how annoying!

    For the most part, this is doable with the bribery of immigration, which is why immigration is so totally necessary to Jews in keeping the loyalty of Diversity.

    Suppose immigration were to end for good in the US. Jews would have no means to bribe non-white diversity to stick with Jewish-dominated Democratic Party. Diversity votes for Democratic Party because it thinks, “I can bring my relatives to get more gibs in America.” That is IT.

    What else can Jews offer to Diversity? More government programs? But government doesn’t shrink under Republicans.

    Now, blacks should oppose immigration because newcomers out-compete blacks. But black politics is still in (1) stick it to whitey mode and of course GOP is seen a whitey and (2) Democratic Party. For that reason, blacks have come to favor Democratic victory over true black interests because they’ve become so used to thinking Democratic Victory = Black Power. And Obama is a Democrat. But he mostly served Jews and homos and Immigrants, not blacks.

    Anyway, Jews of Democratic Party would have no means to buy the loyalty of Diversity unless they could bribe it with more immigration.

    • Replies: @ATBOTL
  128. Groups like this eventually choke on their own offal and consume themselves. They bring absolutely nothing to the table.

  129. @El Dato

    The source of Gandhi’s problem was the excessive kasturbation in his youth.

    • LOL: PiltdownMan
    • Replies: @PiltdownMan
  130. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Jack D

    All you have to do is identify yourself as “genderqueer” and call yourself “Bob” (never really did like Mari anyway) and instantly you gain thousands of Diversity Pokemon Points, so many points that you can sit opposite black people without having to hang your head in shame and grovel. Brilliant!

    There’s only one slight problem. Everyone can do it. I can call myself genderqueer and announce that my name is now Mildred.

    Pretty soon three-quarters of Millennial man will be genderqueer, and at least 90% of Millennial women. Instant status, instant escape from the shame of being an evil oppressor, instant access to affirmative action.

    When everyone belongs to the oppressed there will be a severe shortage of oppressors. When everyone is genderqueer then everyone is part of the LGBTQWERTY community.

    It loses its brand appeal. The actual homosexuals and trannies will find that they’re suddenly nothing special. They’re just part of the amorphous mass of 98% of the population that belongs to the LGBTQWERTY community. They ain’t gonna like that.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  131. dfordoom says: • Website
    @anon

    WWIII could easily lead to a Chinese-led world order and a decimated, permanently destroyed USA

    OK, I don’t see a downside to that.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  132. Marty T says:
    @PTT

    The Democrat party’s young leaders are increasingly “anti-zionist” i.e. bigoted against Jews. Two new Sharian-American congresswomen are leading the charge. Older Jews like Schumer are out of step with the rabidly anti-Israel party base. The Republican party is clearly better for Israel at this point.

    I’m glad Steve finally wrote about this topic. As Coulter brilliantly states the leftist coalition includes lots of people who should naturally hate each other. Muslim feminists and Jewish feminists among them. A smart GOP would be spending the next few years pushing some buttons to get these groups at each other’s throats more and more.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  133. @Jack D

    And the Commonwealth ended in 1795 and the Jews of Poland found themselves under the Czars, some of whom made no secret of the fact that they wanted to get rid of their Jewish population (Jews had never been permitted to live in Russia proper except in very limited #s) by any means possible.

    I would think that the Jews would want to leave a situation like that. Why would you want to stay in a place where you know they do not want you? Russia isn’t their homeland, so why shed a tear over leaving it?

    • Replies: @Johann Ricke
    , @Old Jew
  134. dfordoom says: • Website
    @unpc downunder

    Why do so few white males refuse to address this question.

    The white males with access to the Megaphone are the rich white males.

    Why do rich white males fund anti-white causes?

    Because they don’t identify as white men. They identify as rich men. And those anti-white causes serve the interests of the corporate sector so those rich white males will get richer.

    As far as the rich are concerned the non-rich are a different species, which exists merely to serve the interests (economic and political) of the rich.

  135. @Reg Cæsar

    Gandhi had pangs of guilt all his life about the fact that, at the moment of his father’s death, he was in bed with his wife, Kasturba, instead.

    Gandhi being Gandhi, we know all about his sex life, his inner life, his alimentary canal, and many other things. The guy was a prodigiously industrious writer and confessionalist in the Victorian mode, treating the readers his newspaper to a daily column about the latest goings on within the inner Gandhi.

    http://www.arvindguptatoys.com/arvindgupta/gandhiexperiments.pdf

  136. Marty T says:
    @Tulip

    Jewish intermarriage rates are well over 50 percent so many “jews” now have substantial gentile or asian ancestry.

    • Replies: @Tulip
  137. Marty T says:
    @Colin Wright

    Your son sounds like an Antifa loser.

  138. Marty T says:
    @Jack D

    The Jews are seeing the light more and more as the Democrat party moves against Israel. As you say it’s inevitable. At some point they’ll have no choice.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @ATBOTL
  139. Marty T says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Jews aren’t 25 percent of Ivies unless you include all half and quarter Jews.

    As for the upper middle class Jews they are in basically the same position as other upper middle class white people.

  140. Anon[981] • Disclaimer says:
    @AnotherDad

    People who don’t have a lot of smarts or self-discipline benefit from having a father in the household to raise you. A father is smarter than the kid is, and if the kid lacks discipline, the father will impose it.

  141. Anonymous[145] • Disclaimer says:
    @Marty T

    Isn’t that what neoconservatism is? Can we expect a resurgence of pro-immigration pro-war astroturfing in the Republican party?

  142. Anonymous[284] • Disclaimer says:
    @syonredux

    Reading between the lines, it becomes quite clear that Judah Benjamin was gay.

    His final years were spent in London while his wife lived in Paris where he visited her once a year.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  143. Anon[981] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m not so certain this was an anti-white or anti-Jewish putsch at all, but an attempt by the ostracizers to shrink the leadership so that the remaining leaders get ALL (ahem) of the salary being paid to the leadership circle. Also, if no white fanatics are there to oversee the accounting, the blacks and browns get to toss out honest bookkeeping and feather their nest with Soros’ money without having to explain to their followers where it went.

    When whitey’s back is turned, the blacks and browns will do a smash and grab. Minorities in their natural state have no problem with corruption and can’t avoid the temptation.

    When you want to understand a person’s motives, follow the money.

  144. black sea says:

    His final years were spent in London while his wife lived in Paris where he visited her once a year.

    I’ve know plenty of heterosexual couples who would be happy to adopt such an arrangement, and a few with the resources actually to have done so.

  145. Anonymous[237] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    You’re wrong – which is always the way with you.

    It was Christians – and only Christians – amongst every creed, nationality, race and other grouping which characterizes the world – who are/were responsible for the move to abolish slavery.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  146. Anonymous[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @PTT

    So long as Jews fear God they have nothing to fear from gentiles.

  147. @Jack D

    Apparently a high proportion of the early Spanish slave traders were conversos (see e.g., The Atlantic Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas).

    Its not like they had a special love of slavery. They were just the major shipping merchants at the time and an investment is an investment.

  148. @Reg Cæsar

    The 1950s Los Angeles seal was wonderfully politically incorrect. It not only had a Christian Cross and a conquistador’s caravelle, but a couple of oil rigs for good measure.

    They don’t make ’em like that anymore.

  149. Anonymous[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emblematic

    This depends on your definition of “Jew”. Spanish/Portuguese ‘conversos’ were prominent in the Atlantic slave trade for centuries. These people were by Jewish (Sephardic) by ancestry but Christian by religion.

    At any rate, this has nothing to do with the Ashkenazim, who are rightly indignant at being blamed for the actions of their renegade cousins.

  150. Tulip says:
    @Marty T

    How does that make Anti-White rhetoric any safer for Jews? If you have disproportional influence beyond your demographic heft and well beyond your innate talent, how would it possibly help to dwell on “those people” with alleged disproportionate influence and privilege?

  151. Tulip says:
    @unpc downunder

    What is wrong with funding a race war to further your interests in a class war?

  152. ATBOTL says:
    @Whiskey

    We’ll drop you over Beijing with a parachute and some really sharp chopsticks.

  153. @Reg Cæsar

    Don’t forget Arizona’s Squaw Peak, changed (illegally) to Piestewa Peak to honor a Native American woman killed in the Iraq War. (Federal law requires the namesake to have been deceased for 10 years, I believe.) Native spokespeople insisted that “squaw” means “vagina” (a stupid name for a mountain if there ever was one) but I can’t imagine any white person using it in that fashion. It’s in the vein of black rappers calling all women ho’s.

  154. @unpc downunder

    This reminds me of how the allegedly conservative Economist dismissed the men’s movement, saying that the predominance of males in Parliament and Congress proved there was no discrimination against men. I canceled my subscription shortly after that.

  155. ATBOTL says:
    @PTT

    Unfortunately, Zman’s suggestion that “Jews […] hunt down and silence members of their own tribe who are bad for Jews” is quite useless. Back when the Jews lived in small, insular communities, the leadership could exert pressure via the threat of shunning — a known powerful tool for extracting compliance and conformity. These days, secular left-wing group B Jews — the least “Jewish” of them all — are certainly not going to fear any ostracism from group A Jews. So unless Zman is literally suggesting perpetrating physical violence, there’s very little group A Jews can do about the Michelle Goldbergs. And when push comes to shove, we’ll end up defending the group B Jews who helped get us into this mess as well.

    This is not encouraging. You admit you will defend your people who are trying to destroy us.

    • Replies: @PTT
  156. ATBOTL says:
    @Marty T

    We’ve been hearing that claim since the 80’s and it hasn’t happened yet. Why would we even want an influx of people who are hostile to our interests and only coming to our side out of loyalty to a foreign country? We already have a lot those people on our side and they have done nothing but hurt us.

  157. ATBOTL says:

    From comments at

    https://posttenuretourettes.wordpress.com/2017/09/04/sailer-catches-the-ptt-bug/

    eventhisoneistaken
    September 4, 2017 at 6:32 pm
    That wasn’t the intent at all. Rather, the message was: don’t bother with those Jews, because (a) they’re the least “Jewey” of the Jews and (b) they’re on their way to ethno-cultural extinction anyway. To the extent that you engage Jews seriously, engage those who’re in it for the long haul. And needless to say, legitimate grievances or not, most right-wing Jews (this one included) would defend to the death any Jew from group (B) in bodily danger from *that* sector of the alt-right.

    It doesn’t sound like these “Group A” people are doing anything other than hasbara.

  158. Anonymous[217] • Disclaimer says:
    @unpc downunder

    I’m not a man but you have it wrong. We don’t care so much about money. In fact, money is the least important of the things we care about. We care about IQ, social upbringing, and education more than anything else.

    If you’re an IQ 130 Columbia graduate student in art, you are one of us. If you won 10 million from the lottery, but your IQ is 80 and you were formerly a retail employee, you’re a prole.

    We don’t hate poor people. We hate proles and low IQ people. And not just the white ones. We basically have disdain for all low IQ people. It’s just that the thing is, you can spot a black or a hispanic from a mile away. You can’t tell if a white person is high IQ or low IQ from a distance.

  159. Jack D says:
    @dfordoom

    Absolutely, this kind of shtick will wear out its welcome eventually. But if you get in on the racket early enough you can get a lot of mileage out of it, especially if you are the inventor of the concept. It’s like long hair in the Sixties – the Beatles were able to make a career out of it, eventually millions of guys had it (all copying the Beatles) and you couldn’t make 5 cents off of it. “Bob” is a pioneer and she has done well with it – that this will become common and trite later on takes nothing away from her accomplishment.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  160. Jack D says:
    @dfordoom

    I pray that you don’t live long enough to rue those words, because should it come to pass, you will, you will. You have no idea how much you will.

  161. Jack D says:
    @Marty T

    Having the Coalition of the Fringes clawing at each other’s throats is fun to watch but ultimately the goal of the GOP should be to completely peel the Jews away from the Democrat Party, just as the Jews of the UK are now completely alienated from the Labour Party. This is doubleplusgood. First of all, instead of clever Jews like Schumer running the Party you will have 2nd rate intellects like Ellison and Alexandra Occasional Socialist. 2nd, you will have Jews fighting for Team White. The only downside is you will no longer get to hate on Jews.

  162. Jack D says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    You version of America bears little if any resemblance to actual America. If you look at blockbusting in Northeast cities in the ’50s and ’60s, Jews were the hardest hit – scratch the black ghetto in any Eastern city and you will find the former Jewish neighborhood, complete with synagogues turned into black churches. The Italians tended to stay and fight. The 1st black family on a Jewish block meant that all the other Jews would quickly sell out. The 1st black family on an Italian block would suffer an unfortunate and unexplained fire when no one was home. Most Jews aside from the ultra-religious don’t attend Jewish schools – that’s much more common for Catholics. If there’s any ethnic group in the US that was able to fly above the clouds of the black invasion of American big cities, that was the Catholics, and particularly the Italians and not the Jews. The suburbanization of Jews really led to their downfall as a unified ethnic group – back in the city they lived in mostly Jewish neighborhoods but in the suburbs they were all mixed up and their kids socialized with (and later married) non-Jews.

    • Agree: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @dfordoom
  163. @Jack D

    Women are especially sensitive about “going along with the crowd” – this is why they all adopt the same fashions at the same time. Women who live together even synchronize their periods. There must be socio-biological evolutionary reasons for this.

  164. syonredux says:
    @Anonymous

    Reading between the lines, it becomes quite clear that Judah Benjamin was gay.

    His final years were spent in London while his wife lived in Paris where he visited her once a year.

    I think that a case could be made that the antebellum South was the least anti-Gay part of the country:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Henry_Hammond#Relationships

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson_Withers

    Withers’ May 15, 1826 letter to Hammond:

    “whether you yet sleep in your shirt-tail, and whether you yet have the extravagant delight of poking and punching a writhing Bedfellow with your long fleshen pole– the exquisite touches of which I have often had the honor of feeling? Let me say unto thee, that unless thou changest former habits in this particular, thou wilt be represented by every future chum as a nuisance . . . Sir, you roughen the downy slumbers of your Bedfellow– by such hostile lunges as you are in the habit of making at him– when he is least prepared for a defence against the crushing force of a Battering Ram.”

  165. PTT says:
    @ATBOTL

    Of course we’ll defend our people, as you would presumably defend yours — even if you have deep, existential disagreements with them. If you deplore ethnomasochism from fellow whites, you should not expect it from nationalist Jews — even those Jews who are interested in forming an alliance, based on common interests and common enemies. You’re ignoring the qualifier “when push comes to shove” there; and if you have fantasies of push coming to shove, then obviously the offer of an alliance is not meant for you.

  166. PTT says:
    @snorlax

    Re: gun club — you don’t know the half of it…

    I have floated on my blog numerous times the idea of a natural alliance between what I call group A Jews and their sane analog on the alt-right. Here is a typical post:
    https://posttenuretourettes.wordpress.com/2017/08/21/notalljews/

    Steve Sailer occasionally shows an understanding that lumping all Jews into a single group with a coherent strategy, is putting it mildly, at odds with the observed empirical reality. But mostly his modus operandi on the J question is to reach for the butterknife:
    https://posttenuretourettes.wordpress.com/2017/10/01/sailers-butterknife/

    • Replies: @snorlax
  167. @syonredux

    I think that a case could be made that the antebellum South was the least anti-Gay part of the country:

    Was any ticket tighter than Miss Nancy and Aunt Fancy?

    “King referred to the relationship as a ‘communion’, and the two attended social functions together.”

    http://factmyth.com/factoids/james-buchanan-was-americas-first-gay-president/

  168. ATBOTL says:
    @Anon

    I think POC politicians can only be corralled by establishment interests of any kind when they are not the majority of D voters and politicians. It’s the white Democrats who enforce the neoliberal orthodoxy. We see how the POC D’s in the House are constantly straying off the reservation on foreign policy.

    I predict that the as the POC share rises among D’s, boldness in confronting neoliberal imperialism increases with it. We are already seeing signs of this in Congress. This will prove a bigger problem for the right than anyone is talking about yet. The right desperately needs the left to be neoliberal globalists.

  169. The fraying of the fringes can be problematic at times:

    California politician arrested after spanking his 7-year-old daughter: ‘It’s something that we do’

    Arambula says he was only trying to discipline his daughter after recent child abuse arrest

    Assemblyman Joaquin was chided by a pop psychologist named Greenburg. Sounds like a clear case of white supremacism, especially as Dr Greenberg is somewhat rufous.

    But Ass’man (or whatever the abbreviation is) Arambula will now be a “white Hispanic”.

    • Replies: @Anon
  170. @YetAnotherAnon

    What is legit alarming is that the J-Left are willing to endure massive amounts of persecution & danger to sustain their greater, long term goal of driving Whites into a disenfranchised Minority in virtually every White homeland. [Paging the mugged Matty Yglesias]
    This is a huge clue to the level of their Animus against White Christians. A big percentage of the J-Left harbor a lust to do to Whites here what the ANC is doing to Whites in S Africa.
    Be warned !

  171. @Jack D

    There may have been a time when the Jews of Poland were relatively few in number and so their middle man minority niche was a profitable one. But they invested their “profits” in high fertility and ended up as 10% of the population of Poland. 

    The real turning point was not so much the fertility explosion as it was the 17th century Shabbetai Zevi phenomenon. Prior to that, European Jewry had a rentier position in European society in many ways comparable to today. And almost equally in parallel to today, Sabbeteanism was very much the SJWism of its day, a batshit crazy movement that kept on doubling down further on insanity every day it lasted. The rabbis tried to sweep it all under the rug after the phenomenon burned out, but the gentile chronicles are clear: it caught on like wildfire in Jewish communities from Tashkent to Newport RI, and the aftermath was that the Jews were back on a trajectory to impoverished second-class citizenship everywhere east of Germany. Steve has written often about the Donmeh in Turkey, but not as often about how Sabbeteanism as a whole is due for a re-evaluation in the age of the SJW.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  172. See the monologue “Women’s Convention” by Nipsey Russel on the Humorsonic Records LP 701, circa 1955. Nipsey was definitely ahead of his time!

  173. @The Man From K Street

    it caught on like wildfire in Jewish communities from Tashkent to Newport RI, and the aftermath was that the Jews were back on a trajectory to impoverished second-class citizenship everywhere east of Germany.

    Thanks. What’s the causal mechanism?

    • Replies: @Old Jew
  174. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    You really need to follow the script rather than ad lib. Chevy Chase, you’re not.

    Anonymous [224] quipped that “Of course, nowhere in the Koran do you find an explicit condemnation of the institution of slavery, in fact one can discern the tacit acceptance and approval.”

    Which I responded, correctly, that he must also include the Bible and Torah. So, do you agree or disagree? Why?

    “It was Christians – and only Christians – amongst every creed, nationality, race and other grouping which characterizes the world – who are/were responsible for the move to abolish slavery.”

    Actually, it was Christians, Jews, and Muslims, at various points in time, who are/were responsible for abolishing slavery.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anonymous
  175. Anon[599] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Chevy Chase, you’re not.

    And you are?

    But which one?

    This one?

    Or this one?

  176. @Joe Schmoe

    I would think that the Jews would want to leave a situation like that. Why would you want to stay in a place where you know they do not want you? Russia isn’t their homeland, so why shed a tear over leaving it?

    You couldn’t just leave, any more than all the wypipo in the US can just leave today. You need a place that will take you in. Alternatively, you can do what the Goths and the Huns did – force your way in. But that takes numbers – something that Jews lacked.

  177. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Jack D

    Absolutely, this kind of shtick will wear out its welcome eventually. But if you get in on the racket early enough you can get a lot of mileage out of it

    Yes, you need to be an Early Adopter. The trick is to spot these opportunities before anyone else does.

    But that can be risky too. Ask Rachel Dolezal. Pioneers are often misunderstood and persecuted.

  178. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Jack D

    but ultimately the goal of the GOP should be to completely peel the Jews away from the Democrat Party, just as the Jews of the UK are now completely alienated from the Labour Party. This is doubleplusgood.

    There is one danger. The Republican Party, like the British Tories, is thoroughly hated by a huge segment of the population. Do Jews really want to join a party that attracts so much well-deserved hate? And is it wise for Jews to associate themselves with parties that are widely regarded as representing only the interests of the elites? Isn’t that going to reinforce every negative stereotype of Jews?

    Has it really worked for British Jews? The British used to be pretty much indifferent to their Jewish minority. Now British Jews are just more Tory Scum.

    Perhaps Jews gravitated towards Labor and the Democrats to make themselves more popular?

    I don’t have a dog in this fight. I’m not Jewish and I’m not obsessed with the Jews. I don’t think they’re responsible for all our problems. But if I were Jewish I think I’d be just a teeny bit nervous about this strategy.

  179. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Jack D

    The suburbanization of Jews really led to their downfall as a unified ethnic group – back in the city they lived in mostly Jewish neighborhoods but in the suburbs they were all mixed up and their kids socialized with (and later married) non-Jews.

    That’s the problem with assimilation isn’t it? If you assimilate successfully you cease to exist. You end up as just part of that gunky mess on the bottom of the melting pot.

    I don’t have a dog in this fight either but it always saddens me to see actual diversity, cultural diversity, disappear.

    If you don’t care enough about your own culture to hang on to it then you’re going to end up with no culture at all.

    Much the same thing has happened in Australia. We used to have distinctively Italian neighbourhoods in Sydney, distinctively Chinese enclaves, even Jewish neighbourhoods (in the Eastern Suburbs). Now we have the same soul-deadening monoculture everywhere.

  180. @Emblematic

    Go to YouTube and search for Professor Tony Martin, he’ll fill you in on the details.

    Ask yourself why the 2nd oldest synagogue on US territory is in Charlotte Amelie in St Thomas, US Virgin Islands?

    Ever wondered how it came to be that the first Prime Minister of Jamaica was named Bustamente – a Portuguese surname?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  181. @Anonymous

    This depends on your definition of “Jew”. Spanish/Portuguese ‘conversos’ were prominent in the Atlantic slave trade for centuries. These people were by Jewish (Sephardic) by ancestry but Christian by religion.

    If they were conversos they would not have been expelled from Spain.

    They were Jews.

    But nice attempt.

  182. Anonymous[407] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Where in the New Testament can you find an explicit reference to ‘Those that your right hand possesses’ – as to be found in certain. sura – the meaning of this phrase explicitly means ‘slaves’, or any passage that can be construed as meaning that Jesus or the Apostles ever explicitly accommodated or defended the practice of chattel slavery?

    As mentioned earlier, the Abolitionist movement was originated by Christians and only Christians. It could scarcely be doubted – except by you, of course – that were it not for the initial efforts of the first abolitionists, slavery would still be practised, to this very day, on a massive scale throughout virtually *every single* third world nation you care to name – as it indeed it was practised since time immemorial right up to the 19th century.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  183. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    “Where in the New Testament can you find an explicit reference to ‘Those that your right hand possesses’ – as to be found in certain. sura – the meaning of this phrase explicitly means ‘slaves’, or any passage that can be construed as meaning that Jesus or the Apostles ever explicitly accommodated or defended the practice of chattel slavery?”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_slavery

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_slavery

    “As mentioned earlier, the Abolitionist movement was originated by Christians and only Christians.”

    Again, it was Christians, Jews, and Muslims, at various points in time, who are/were responsible for abolishing slavery.

    “It could scarcely be doubted – except by you, of course – that were it not for the initial efforts of the first abolitionists, slavery would still be practised, to this very day, on a massive scale throughout virtually *every single* third world nation you care to name – as it indeed it was practised since time immemorial right up to the 19th century.”

    If we employ your “logic”, had it not been for the initial efforts of those who engaged in revolt against their European imperial masters in the late and early 1900’s, imperialism would still be practiced, to this day, on a massive scale by virtually *every single* European nation you care to name – as it indeed was practice from the 1500’s to the 1950’s.

  184. Corvinus says:
    @Rastafari in a Babylon

    “Go to YouTube and search for Professor Tony Martin, he’ll fill you in on the details.”

    His research has significant flaws. Besides, he is a black man. I thought whitey ought not trust “those kind of people”. Why do YOU?

    According to the research of Eli Faber from 1998, he posits that Jews did NOT play a leading role as the financial backers or transporters in the transatlantic or Caribbean slave trades. For starters, no ship fitted out for the slave trade that originated in Great Britain was under the direct or indirect control of a Jew. The data provided by the author demonstrates that Jews played little or no role in importing or selling slaves. If you could find research that contradicts his findings, I am all ears.

    For example, from 1709-1807, there are 934 recorded voyages in which Rhode Island merchants were responsible for procuring 106,000 slaves. Now, Jews arrived in Newport as early as 1658. On the eve of the Revolution, they were estimated to be around thirty families. According to historical records Faber used (e.g. naval office shipping lists, censuses, tax records) that identified merchants and planters as Jewish, there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by NON-JEWS. Of course, Jews played a role in the peddling of human flesh. The extent in this particular case is nominal compared to other ethnic groups.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @Anon
  185. Gender equality across the pond:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6500231/Eight-year-old-pupils-told-boys-periods-new-sex-education-guidelines.html

    One reader commented, “I am losing the will to live.” I’m not quite at that point yet, but that reader has my sympathy.

  186. Jack D says:
    @Corvinus

    Exactly. No one of good faith disputes that (mainly Sephardic) Jews played some marginal role in the slave trade (and in the plantation system in the South). But they were not prominent players. The vast majority of slave traders were Christian (and the Muslims participated further back in the slave gathering process in Africa). So the question is why guys like Farrakhan and Martin and Mr. Rastafari of Brooklyn keep focusing on the Jewish role exclusively?

    Or as some Jewish guy said, speak not of the mote in your neighbor’s eye but of the beam in your own.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  187. sayless says:
    @Jack D

    Alexandra O.-C. was attending a Hanukkah event and told people that her “family was Sephardic.” So Ben Shapiro replied and said he wasn’t impressed: “You still support Boycott Divest Sanction.”

    Someone should start a blog, The Best of Alexandra. She’s entertaining.

  188. Goob says:
    @Lot

    In photo which is “Bob”?

  189. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Redneck farmer

    Antoine Johnson 1654 or so. He was only the plaintiff who wanted to turn his servant into a slave. It was the Judge who legalized slavery. The unspeakable obscenity of a judge could have ruled against him.

    1654 to today, just about every bad law in this country was created by judges.

  190. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    It might be because since 1910 Jews have presented themselves as the saviors of the helpless blacks against the evil WASP oppressors.

    The Black Muslim headquarters is in a formerly Jewish neighborhood of Chicago. I don’t know if that has anything to do with it.

  191. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    Umm there are plenty of reliable statistics drawn from the 1790 to 1860 censuses showing as much as 70%Jews to 3o% Goyim slave owners

    It wasn’t just in the age of exploration either. Lehman brothers arrived in New Orleans around 1800. They soon became the second largest slave brokers in the south.
    When they went to N. California in 1851 they wanted to bring in a load of slaves. But California kept the Spanish Mexican law codes which explicitly forbade slavery.

    The Lehmans became bankers in California and then went to New York You’re right. Everybody did it Jews were just over represented

  192. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    The infamous ship that brought the first Africans to Virginia in 1619 was owned by Dutch Jews. The captain told the English settlers he was headed for Brazil and was blown off course by a hurricane Everybody was sick

    So could the slaves and crew stay ashore for a few weeks. Eat fresh food and recover? Of course

    The town was called Henrico. It had a hostel hospital building for travelers. The slaves and some of the crew stayed there for a while.

    Then one morning the ship and Dutch crew were gone and the Africans remained. The Africans were given jobs : indentured as was customary all over Europe at the time and given land to build homes and grow their own food.

    Personally, I very much doubt the hurricane story. It was probably just marketing, like handing out new candy bars and othernew products.

    Why do Jews think we are so naive and ignorant as to believe what they claim? I could never understand it.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  193. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    The Jewish leadership or as I call them the Professional Jews will never join team White.

    Individual Jews joined team White, but the Professiinal leadership never will.

  194. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Christian Christopher Christine Kirsten are all popular in the atheist Scandinavian lands

    Americans think nothing of Jesus now. But when the Hispanic invasion began it seemed vaguely sacrilegious and weird. As weird as naming girls Campbell and Mackinzie. Why not Argyle and MacDonald.?

  195. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “The infamous ship that brought the first Africans to Virginia in 1619 was owned by Dutch Jews.”

    I’m not sure about the ownership part. Historians still debate whether these first Africans were slaves or indentured servants.

    Here is the actual story.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/08/24/slaverys-bitter-roots-in-1619-20-and-odd-negroes-arrived-in-virginia/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b455c78ff873

  196. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @HA

    Thanks for posting this so I don’t have to. Jews ran the Black Sea port of Odessa from which the European slaves were shipped off to Turkey and Persia.

    • Replies: @Old Jew
  197. @Jack D

    ” just as the Jews of the UK are now completely alienated from the Labour Party”

    Only while Jeremy Corbyn is leader, with his irritating (and unheard-of for a modern British party leader) neutrality vis a vis Israel/Palestine.

    The moment the Tony Blair faction (Tom Watson/Keir Starmer, the odious Wes Streeting) regain control, watch that alienation vanish away like the dew in the morn.

  198. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    He must have hit her pretty hard. Spanking a child even with a wooden spoon is legal in California. Leaving a bruise is legal in California.

    It’s child abuse if the punishment is excessive.

    The law clearly states that if anyone in charge of children; teacher coach scout leader etc becomes aware of child abuse must be reported and soon. Don’t know the timeline It’s a crime for a teacher to not report it.

    First the report then the investigation Then the arrest and all children placed with relatives or even foster homes until investigation is complete and parents deemed fit.

    The father was’nt arrested just because the child reported a spanking. The father was arrested because after an investigation the spanking was determined to be child abuse.

    Police and child services are accustomed to divorced parents buttinsky grandparents and poor people wanting relatives kids in their homes for the welfare making unfounded reports of child abuse

    So they don’t file charges and arrest for an ordinary spanking.

    It’s incredibly discriminatory in that black and Hispanic parents are way way over represented in child abuse convictions just as they are way way over represented in flunking out of school welfare dependency prison jail etc

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  199. Old Jew says:
    @Steve Sailer

    …..Bohdan Hmelnitzki Uprising…..

    …… Tremendous suffering and upheaval……..

    …. clearly Messiah must arrive any day now……

  200. Old Jew says:
    @Anon

    Wikipedia says:

    In 1794, the city of Odessa was founded by a decree of the Russian empress Catherine the Great.

    What European slaves …. under Empress Ekaterina ?

    was your post serious or sarcastic?

  201. Old Jew says:
    @Joe Schmoe

    Those were “dark middle ages” (in Eastern Europe). people did not know they can leave.

    Eighty years later, after the tremendous development of literacy, newspapers, Jews in Russia found out that they can leave, and by 1880 the headed to America……

  202. @Anon

    It’s incredibly discriminatory in that black and Hispanic parents are way way over represented in child abuse convictions just as they are way way over represented in flunking out of school welfare dependency prison jail etc

    Remember the Adrian Peterson kerfuffle four years ago? White Minnesotans got quite dandered up. Maybe they confused him with a Swede, considering his name. (But he’s actually a native Palestinian.) White folks just can’t mind their business!

    https://blogs.mprnews.org/newscut/2018/11/adrian-peterson-still-beats-his-son/

    Something from the same source– we’ve bought cupcakes here, but missed out on the turkey thing.

    https://blogs.mprnews.org/newscut/2018/11/cake-posing-turkey-posed-as-stripper-runs-afoul-of-sex-workers/

  203. @Citizen of a Silly Country

    What’s with Mexican Americans being 4% Jewish? That’s up there with Eastern Europe and Germany. Are there that many Jews in Mexico or were the Spanish who settled in Mexico particularly Jewish?

    The Spanish who settled there were significantly Jewish (probably 10-25%), although the numbers elsewhere in the New World were higher in many places.

  204. @Lot

    I doubt the Spanish have much Arabian blood.

    Some have Arab names, though, like Diaz.

    • Replies: @Lot
  205. snorlax says:
    @PTT

    Which half?

    Of everything Steve’s written, his accusing SRE of “anti-Gentilic animus” seems like an odd point to take issue with.

    UVA’s aura of preppy success, where throngs of toned, tanned and overwhelmingly blond students fanned across a landscape of neoclassical brick buildings

    • Replies: @ATBOTL
    , @PTT
  206. ATBOTL says:
    @snorlax

    Notice that the hyper ethnocentric neocons who come on here saying they want an alliance with whites are constantly defending anti-white Jews.

    How hard is it just to say “SRE is a bitch who hates white Americans”? If you clowns could just say that, you might have a chance of gaining trust.

    But you guys are so fanatically ethnocentric that you can’t help defending Jews who attack whites and attacking whites who notice it happening. At the same time, you say you want an alliance with us.

    Comical.

    • Replies: @PTT
  207. PTT says:
    @snorlax

    I used to co-run a gun club.

    My “butterknife” post makes the following point: Steve Sailer often puts a distinctly Jewish spin on run-of-the-mill SJW behavior. I argue that this is only fair when the SJW explicitly invoke their Jewishness, as Max Boot and Brett Stephens occasionally do. But SRE did not, and Sailer’s anti-Gentilic malice is pure hallucination. I don’t see what your quote is meant to illustrate. It could’ve been written by an ethnomasochist white as well, or a black/hispanic/Asian nationalist. Also, it’s rather mild as far as “malice” goes. Whoa, she noticed a lot of blond people! Sailer, of all people, should have the least of problems with people *noticing* things.

  208. PTT says:
    @ATBOTL

    I’ll agree that SRE behaved highly unethically. Her hatred for white Americans seems to be of the run-of-the-mill SJW variety: i.e., exactly the same hatred she harbors for anti-feminist, Zionist Jews like myself. As for alliances: nobody was offering one to you personally. We can only pray that all of our enemies were like you.

    • Replies: @snorlax
  209. snorlax says:
    @PTT

    I don’t endorse ATBOTL’s comment, and I agree that politically conservative gentiles and Jews ought to be allies. That said it’s clear that SRE has an animus towards gentiles as well as whites and conservatives. Would she be equally likely or less likely to describe Brandeis students as “preppy” and “toned, tanned and overwhelmingly blond?” If Jackie named her attacker as “Haven Moskovitz,” would she have been equally likely or more likely to e.g. check that the mysterious Mr. Moskovitz was actually a student at UVA?

    • Replies: @PTT
  210. PTT says: • Website
    @snorlax

    It’s a tough hypothetical. Playing the armchair mind-reader, I could see SRE seeing a “Moskovitz” and projecting on him her own image of what a Nice Jewish Boy should look and act like. Trust me, if she heard *this* Jewish man speak, she’d be pointing and sputtering and reciting poems and dropping the H-bomb in no time. In summary: I suppose SRE would be more favorable to toward abstract, generic Jews, under the assumption that they toe the appropriate SJW line (backed, unfortunately, by the statistics).

  211. Lot says:
    @ben tillman

    Diaz isn’t Arab, like most -z names it means “Son of” in this case, Diego.

    That from the Visigoths.

    You can also tell it isn’t Arab because it is more common in Castille than Andalusia.

    Not sure the Spanish Muslims actually used surnames then either as opposed to the abu/bin system that changes each generation.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?