With Apologies to M. Houellebecq ...
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
72 Comments to "With Apologies to M. Houellebecq ..."
Commenters to ignore (one per line)
Commenters to follow (one per line)
Trim Comments?
Comments are closed.
Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSSPastClassics
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Teach your children well.
By nature, people like the strong horse.
“She’s like, so liberated and provocative in her oppression.”
It’s so confusing in our pomo age.
Are we submitting to Islam or is Islam submitting to the West?
US and EU are different. EU is right next to Muslim lands and face real danger of demographic imperialism.
US, in contrast, won’t have to worry about Muslim immigration. Occasional terrorism yes, but no Muslim takeover. US had more to fear from mass immigration from Latin America and Asia. And its big black population.
Still, it’s all connected since the US foreign policy is controlled by globalists who keep messing up the Middle East. If not for US and its encouragement to allies like Saudis, Syrian Civil War would have ended long ago, and there would have been no massive refugee crisis. And Iraq is a mess cuz of US policies.
And then, Obama and Hillary really did it by toppling the Gaffer of Libya.
US and its vassal EU has already submitted to the GLOB. The GLOB has worldwide ambitions, and that means messing up MENA.
GLOB’s strategy is invade/invite, esp since the ‘humane’ face of Invite masks the brutality of the Invade.
This is especially dangerous because a stable North Africa serves as wall between Europe and Sub-Saharan Black Africa.
That was Gaffer’s warning and extortion to Europe. He will play watchman IF they pay him. (Erdogan also plays this extortion racket somewhat.) But the fall of the Gaffer really broke the dam.
Muslims should find the image of woman with US-flag veil to be offensive as hell because, since the end of the Cold War, the US has brought more misery to MENA than any other nation.
What is most offensive is the idea that Trump is a bad guy cuz he says NO to ‘refugees’.
The Media don’t ask WHY THE REFUGEES EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Imagine Hitler invading Poland and then pressing on US to take Polish refugees OR be condemned for its lack of heart.
Imagine Japan invading China and then pressing the US to take Chinese refugees OR be condemned for its lack of humanitarianism.
In order not to fall into the trap set by globalists — “nationalists are anti-human xenophobes because they say NO to ‘refugees’ whereas globalists are so caring cuz they say YES” — , the patriots must press the case of STOP CREATING REFUGEES WITH NEO-IMPERIALIST AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY CONTROLLED BY THE GLOB”.
Trump did suggest as much at times by accusing US foreign policy of messing up the region. But patriots must hammer this point home over and over.
Tulsi Gabbard did just this by pointing out that Syrian people are wondering why the US has aided rebranded Alqaeda in Syria.
Now, Conservatives are loathe to do this because they are so slavish to Jewish Power, and that means no condemnation of Neocon foreign policy.
Trump supporters are quick to condemn Muslims but generally don’t spell out why the Muslims are on the move in such big numbers.
Also, for patriots, the idea that the US has become an imperialist power is difficult to swallow. But, patriots must go there because true nationalism means not only defense of homeland but respect for the homelands of others as well. And it’s been the US, controlled by the GLOB, that’s been messing up homelands all over.
Interesting to compare Shepard Fairey’s poster with the photograph he worked from. In subtle ways, he made the woman in the photo less ethnic, more glamorous.
http://mashable.com/2017/01/23/inauguration-womens-march-poster-woman/#cxXg6eUPpaqj
Fairey was sued by the photographer who took the photo of Obama that the HOPE poster was based on. I think the photographer had a legitimate grievance, as it appears that Fairey may have just put the photo into Photoshop, desaturated it, adjusted the contrasts, and then used the posterize effect. Granted, there would be some additional cleaning up and finessing, but the photographer deserves most of the credit.
Like Banksy, Fairey benefits greatly from producing images that appeal to the politically correct. He knows his market. (Banksy is more creative than Fairey, though.)
Sounds like your white privilege, norming Caucasian looks as "less ethnic" is showing here.
I guess, and according to the grandfather of designational sophistry which Shepard peddles to the sheep, in the future every Fairey's poster will be iconic for 15 minutes.
The Man In The Storefront Mosque
http://mashable.com/2017/01/23/inauguration-womens-march-poster-woman/#cxXg6eUPpaqj
Fairey was sued by the photographer who took the photo of Obama that the HOPE poster was based on. I think the photographer had a legitimate grievance, as it appears that Fairey may have just put the photo into Photoshop, desaturated it, adjusted the contrasts, and then used the posterize effect. Granted, there would be some additional cleaning up and finessing, but the photographer deserves most of the credit.
Like Banksy, Fairey benefits greatly from producing images that appeal to the politically correct. He knows his market. (Banksy is more creative than Fairey, though.)
Everyone is ethnic to the same degree, so how can someone look less “ethnic”.
Sounds like your white privilege, norming Caucasian looks as “less ethnic” is showing here.
adjective
1.
relating to a population subgroup (within a larger or dominant national or cultural group) with a common national or cultural tradition.seems like an appropriate usage to me.
German Feminazis believe Muslim men treat women way better than Donald J. Trump does, hence why they chant Allahu Akbar.
Unlike Donald J. Trump and White men in general, Muslim men actually believe in women’s rights.
You could just use the word “Submit” with the same font Fairey uses for his Obama poster.
http://mashable.com/2017/01/23/inauguration-womens-march-poster-woman/#cxXg6eUPpaqj
Fairey was sued by the photographer who took the photo of Obama that the HOPE poster was based on. I think the photographer had a legitimate grievance, as it appears that Fairey may have just put the photo into Photoshop, desaturated it, adjusted the contrasts, and then used the posterize effect. Granted, there would be some additional cleaning up and finessing, but the photographer deserves most of the credit.
Like Banksy, Fairey benefits greatly from producing images that appeal to the politically correct. He knows his market. (Banksy is more creative than Fairey, though.)
I don’t know for sure, but banksy seems to be more genuinely anticapitalist, anticonsumerist, less of a hack
Submission implies other missions. Primary mission, akin to prime directive.
OK, I am not hip, please explain to me what is this all about?
"Submission" is the literal translation of the word "Islam." It's also the title of a new BDSM series on Showtime.
The meme at the top of this post of obviously poking fun at the sexual thrill the West is experiencing at the moment, as it submits to its own demise at the hands of darker and more unruly forces.
Sounds like your white privilege, norming Caucasian looks as "less ethnic" is showing here.
I don’t see the problem. In a Caucasian country, Caucasian features are the norm. In an Arab country, Arab features are the norm.
eth·nic
adjective
1.
relating to a population subgroup (within a larger or dominant national or cultural group) with a common national or cultural tradition.
seems like an appropriate usage to me.
http://mashable.com/2017/01/23/inauguration-womens-march-poster-woman/#cxXg6eUPpaqj
Fairey was sued by the photographer who took the photo of Obama that the HOPE poster was based on. I think the photographer had a legitimate grievance, as it appears that Fairey may have just put the photo into Photoshop, desaturated it, adjusted the contrasts, and then used the posterize effect. Granted, there would be some additional cleaning up and finessing, but the photographer deserves most of the credit.
Like Banksy, Fairey benefits greatly from producing images that appeal to the politically correct. He knows his market. (Banksy is more creative than Fairey, though.)
He made her appear not nearly as fat as she really is.
No it doesn’t.
http://www.google.com
Sounds like your white privilege, norming Caucasian looks as "less ethnic" is showing here.
Everyone is ethnic to the same degree.
Funny but not so. One meaning of an “ethnic” is a member of an ethnic group living within the borders of a different ethnic group (Am Heritage Dict).
This ‘artist’ has a nice little gimmick going. He merely picks up on some available photo, not even one he took himself, and alters it. He gets rich off of this. Just add some evocative words such as obey and he’s another Warhol. I know things are too far gone by now but it’s still irritating to see the flag being used for clothing and in other inane ways. What’s next, flag toilet paper?
Did I get this from Spotted Toad?
https://spottedtoad.wordpress.com/
The picture is from Shepard Fairey, whose ObeyGiant.com I linked to.
adjective
1.
relating to a population subgroup (within a larger or dominant national or cultural group) with a common national or cultural tradition.seems like an appropriate usage to me.
whoosh
Islam hasn’t been the strong horse in 500+ years. Its terrorism is driven by its weakness and backwardness relative to the West, and the cognitive dissonance that generates.
For a long time I couldn’t buy the premise of Robert Ferrigno’s futuristic dystopian thriller Prayers for the Assassin, which includes the mass conversion to Islam of blue-state America after incidents of nuclear terrorism.
But now I see how it’s perfectly plausible: immigration chic, self-loathing, anti-Christian/anti-Western mania, oikophobia, etc. A witch’s brew of abnormality, served hot or cold.
I'm starting to see tons of green shoots everywhere on this hypothesis.
Basic psychology. People want to belong to something. They want to belong to something confident and proud. Mark Steyn wrote a few years back if Western youth have to choose between two competing identities, one cringing and apologetic ("We'll try to check our white privilege!") and a second that's confident and muscular, don't be surprised if more start to choose the latter.
Is there any evidence of a conversion trend?
Here’s an idea: burkas as part of “fat acceptance.” If every body is veiled, every body is beautiful! I could see feminists getting behind this. “Get your rapey eyes off our bodies!”
For most people appearances trump realities.
Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Strong_Horse
Sounds like your white privilege, norming Caucasian looks as "less ethnic" is showing here.
Not true. E.g. See Putin’s father compared to Putin’s mother. The mother looks more like an ethnic Slav, but Putin’s father could pass for a native of any country in Northern Europe. Putin himself looks like even more of an ethnic Slav than his mother.
Of course it is always nice to see the thought police on duty.
Putin's father looks North Slavic. Putin looks more Russian Finno-Ugric than Slavic.
Putin's mother could pass in a lot of places in Europe, but probably mostly in the Balkans.
Then why did the feminists go topless at the Austin Pussy-Hat rally? They don’t want us to look and then they make us look.
I could see feminists getting behind this.
They already have. Google burqa vs. bikini, especially in images. Third-wave feminism has a sick, obsequious affinity for orthodox Islam.
Islam is a religion associated with brown people, therefore it's good. I hope this clears things up.
adjective
1.
relating to a population subgroup (within a larger or dominant national or cultural group) with a common national or cultural tradition.seems like an appropriate usage to me.
We are a Caucasian country? If you asked the state apparatus that the people of the USA have put into place, it would emphatically deny that we are a Caucasian country, and would have done so at least for the past half century if not longer.
Find me an authoritative reference that states that the U.S. is a Caucasian country, as opposed to something by a group that wishes it were.
Even Trump, the biggest wrecking ball in decades, hasn’t even come close to expressing anything like that.
Don’t let this alternative facts stuff get away with you…..
But now I see how it's perfectly plausible: immigration chic, self-loathing, anti-Christian/anti-Western mania, oikophobia, etc. A witch's brew of abnormality, served hot or cold.
The SJW/atheized population of the West has long been fertile ground for converts to Islam, that’s been my opinion for at least a decade.
I’m starting to see tons of green shoots everywhere on this hypothesis.
But now I see how it's perfectly plausible: immigration chic, self-loathing, anti-Christian/anti-Western mania, oikophobia, etc. A witch's brew of abnormality, served hot or cold.
Like Anatoly Karlin said: People favor the strong horse.
Basic psychology. People want to belong to something. They want to belong to something confident and proud. Mark Steyn wrote a few years back if Western youth have to choose between two competing identities, one cringing and apologetic (“We’ll try to check our white privilege!”) and a second that’s confident and muscular, don’t be surprised if more start to choose the latter.
And now for something completely different :
http://www.duffelblog.com/2017/01/mattis-attends-confirmation-hearing-wearing-spartan-helmet-fuck-isis-boxers/
"Sources later confirmed the dip in question was in fact Long Cut, not any of that pouch bullshit."
Come on Dave. Their “terrorism” is self defense against our–or should I say (((our)))?–colonization, occupation, and bombing of their homelands.
You seem a bit confused there.
Putin’s father looks North Slavic. Putin looks more Russian Finno-Ugric than Slavic.
Putin’s mother could pass in a lot of places in Europe, but probably mostly in the Balkans.
Thank you. I’m really doing you guys a favor.
As noted by others…I’m not always up on my post-modernist transgressions, so, to the extent the USA-themed hijab ironically highlights a point., what is that, exactly?
Like ‘Who, Whom’? it resonated in your mind, but note no one repeated it.
Good idea, bad package.
Love your stuff–you really are one of my first internet reads–but being obtuse doesn’t help.
https://youtu.be/VWX1SKncyOA
Unlike Donald J. Trump and White men in general, Muslim men actually believe in women's rights.
Jefferson, Most of these women couldn’t laid in the maximum security block at Attica, and they know it. Therefore the irrational anger.
So why the Muslim terrorism against Belgium?
Which is why you converted to Islam after Beslan right?
This isn’t entirely wrong, as it far as it goes, but why is the Islamic world the hub of international terrorism whereas Christians/Pagans/Buddhists/Hindus in Africa, Asia, and Latin America don’t do such things? It’s not for the lack of grievances against Western countries. The “cognitive dissonance” has a lot to do with it: the Muslim conviction of their spiritual and cultural superiority clashes with the fact of their material impotence.
Simple. Neither the United States nor Israel are colonizing, occupying, and bombing the areas you have in mind.
This isn’t entirely wrong, as it far as it goes, but why is the Islamic world the hub of international terrorism whereas Christians/Pagans/Buddhists/Hindus in Africa, Asia, and Latin America don’t do such things?
Simple. Neither the United States nor Israel are colonizing, occupying, and bombing the areas you have in mind.
I see Belgium listed here as a belligerant party:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American-led_intervention_in_Iraq_(2014–present)
Why do they attack Bulgaria?
Why did they attack France in 1995? (France was bombing the Serbs on behalf of Muslims at the time).
Why did they attack Spain in 1985?
The word you are looking for is “legbeard” (play on neckbeard)
It’s little to do with the teachings of Islam.
Islam is a religion associated with brown people, therefore it’s good. I hope this clears things up.
Yeah, I’m sure that explains their fondness for redecorating airports with Bruxellois purée.
Why do they attack Bulgaria?
Why did they attack France in 1995? (France was bombing the Serbs on behalf of Muslims at the time).
Why did they attack Spain in 1985?
https://twitter.com/V_of_Europe/status/825059373357621248
Islam is a religion associated with brown people, therefore it's good. I hope this clears things up.
Brown people religions are just OK—better than Christianity (non-black) by default—but they have to obliterate a quarter of Manhattan’s Financial District before a liberal’s heart starts overflowing with love.
The title of Michel Houellebecq’s most recent novel is “Submission.” In it, he imagines France voting in a Muslim government in the near future.
“Submission” is the literal translation of the word “Islam.” It’s also the title of a new BDSM series on Showtime.
The meme at the top of this post of obviously poking fun at the sexual thrill the West is experiencing at the moment, as it submits to its own demise at the hands of darker and more unruly forces.
The West has just interrupted that fantasy like Phoebe Cates walking in on Judge Reinhold.
Why do they attack Bulgaria?
Why did they attack France in 1995? (France was bombing the Serbs on behalf of Muslims at the time).
Why did they attack Spain in 1985?
That is all consistent with what I wrote.
Bulgaria was a retaliatory attack in Bulgaria against an Israeli bus there.
Spain was a retaliatory attack against U.S. soldiers who were there.
France has been involved in Algeria as a colonizer and occupier.
Why do they attack Bulgaria?
Why did they attack France in 1995? (France was bombing the Serbs on behalf of Muslims at the time).
Why did they attack Spain in 1985?
The common thread appears to be the number of Muslims in the country.
https://twitter.com/V_of_Europe/status/825059373357621248
Curious if the Belgian Muslims even knew about that, but okay. Here’s a list of Muslim terrorist attacks. Are you suggesting all of the countries listed are combatants? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks
https://twitter.com/V_of_Europe/status/825059373357621248
The three on top are listed as belligerents in the link I sent you. The three on the bottom are not belligerents.
Curious if the Belgian Muslims even knew about that, but okay.
What reason did they give?
Are you suggesting all of the countries listed are combatants?
Nearly all incidents involved actions directed against aggressor parties who were guilty of colonization, occupation, or bombing.
https://spottedtoad.wordpress.com/
The picture is from Shepard Fairey, whose ObeyGiant.com I linked to.
Yeah, he tweeted this exact idea (which is spot on) a week ago or so.
"Submission" is the literal translation of the word "Islam." It's also the title of a new BDSM series on Showtime.
The meme at the top of this post of obviously poking fun at the sexual thrill the West is experiencing at the moment, as it submits to its own demise at the hands of darker and more unruly forces.
No, it was the post-West having that thrill, as it imagined the West submitting to their domination via those dark, unruly forces.
The West has just interrupted that fantasy like Phoebe Cates walking in on Judge Reinhold.
The Men Thrown Off The High Castle
Interesting point, but, still, they move here and we don’t move there; their influence seems to be on the rise, while ours appears to be falling.
Are we submitting to Islam or is Islam submitting to the West?
US and EU are different. EU is right next to Muslim lands and face real danger of demographic imperialism.
US, in contrast, won't have to worry about Muslim immigration. Occasional terrorism yes, but no Muslim takeover. US had more to fear from mass immigration from Latin America and Asia. And its big black population.
Still, it's all connected since the US foreign policy is controlled by globalists who keep messing up the Middle East. If not for US and its encouragement to allies like Saudis, Syrian Civil War would have ended long ago, and there would have been no massive refugee crisis. And Iraq is a mess cuz of US policies.
And then, Obama and Hillary really did it by toppling the Gaffer of Libya.
US and its vassal EU has already submitted to the GLOB. The GLOB has worldwide ambitions, and that means messing up MENA.
GLOB's strategy is invade/invite, esp since the 'humane' face of Invite masks the brutality of the Invade.
This is especially dangerous because a stable North Africa serves as wall between Europe and Sub-Saharan Black Africa.
That was Gaffer's warning and extortion to Europe. He will play watchman IF they pay him. (Erdogan also plays this extortion racket somewhat.) But the fall of the Gaffer really broke the dam.
Muslims should find the image of woman with US-flag veil to be offensive as hell because, since the end of the Cold War, the US has brought more misery to MENA than any other nation.
What is most offensive is the idea that Trump is a bad guy cuz he says NO to 'refugees'.
The Media don't ask WHY THE REFUGEES EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Imagine Hitler invading Poland and then pressing on US to take Polish refugees OR be condemned for its lack of heart.
Imagine Japan invading China and then pressing the US to take Chinese refugees OR be condemned for its lack of humanitarianism.
In order not to fall into the trap set by globalists --- "nationalists are anti-human xenophobes because they say NO to 'refugees' whereas globalists are so caring cuz they say YES" --- , the patriots must press the case of STOP CREATING REFUGEES WITH NEO-IMPERIALIST AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY CONTROLLED BY THE GLOB".
Trump did suggest as much at times by accusing US foreign policy of messing up the region. But patriots must hammer this point home over and over.
Tulsi Gabbard did just this by pointing out that Syrian people are wondering why the US has aided rebranded Alqaeda in Syria.
Now, Conservatives are loathe to do this because they are so slavish to Jewish Power, and that means no condemnation of Neocon foreign policy.
Trump supporters are quick to condemn Muslims but generally don't spell out why the Muslims are on the move in such big numbers.
Also, for patriots, the idea that the US has become an imperialist power is difficult to swallow. But, patriots must go there because true nationalism means not only defense of homeland but respect for the homelands of others as well. And it's been the US, controlled by the GLOB, that's been messing up homelands all over.
MENA et al, if they are really that miserable, have brought the misery upon themselves. Don’t be so enamored of the idea that a better US foreign policy would bring happiness to blighted areas. If you really think the area sucks, it is because it has too many sucky people with sucky ideas.
Simple. Neither the United States nor Israel are colonizing, occupying, and bombing the areas you have in mind.
There is a kind of inverse relationship between who is colonized, occupied, and bombed; and from where terrorists come. Iraq hasn’t sent many terrorists, while countries we bend over to get along with send plenty.
http://www.npiamerica.org/research/category/what-the-founders-really-thought-about-race
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924
The 1965 act was an aberration and an illegitimate usurpation of our identity as a White European nation. They could only pass it by lying about it, saying it wouldn’t upset our demographics– that America was a predominately White European country with a strong White European supermajority was taken for granted.
But now I see how it's perfectly plausible: immigration chic, self-loathing, anti-Christian/anti-Western mania, oikophobia, etc. A witch's brew of abnormality, served hot or cold.
In the past, conversion to Islam has generally been a right of center eccentricity among military adventurers, black jocks, mystics, and so forth.
Is there any evidence of a conversion trend?
Some intelligent blacks convert in what I take to be a search for self-discipline. Others convert just to be different. Many converts don't know anything about Islam, like Farrakhan's folks. However, I can say from experience that, for all its hateful rhetoric, the Nation of Islam does a good job of maintaining discipline in its aggressive young men, who would not go to the hand-clapping churches of their grandparents. They hate you, but would not rob you.
But what I was getting at is: I can now see as plausible contemporary self-hatred and Islamo-chic added to fear of nuclear terrorism translating into a mass conversion movement.
Pretty sure Anatoly was referring to this stuff. IIRC he was stationed in Karachi for a couple years.
The West has just interrupted that fantasy like Phoebe Cates walking in on Judge Reinhold.
Perhaps. We’ll see how well Marine Le Pen does later this spring. As for Germany, Sweden and much of the rest of Western Europe, I fear they are already far too gone to save.
Is there any evidence of a conversion trend?
No. It will never happen. Americans think the Orthodox churches are too oriental, never mind Islam.
Some intelligent blacks convert in what I take to be a search for self-discipline. Others convert just to be different. Many converts don’t know anything about Islam, like Farrakhan’s folks. However, I can say from experience that, for all its hateful rhetoric, the Nation of Islam does a good job of maintaining discipline in its aggressive young men, who would not go to the hand-clapping churches of their grandparents. They hate you, but would not rob you.
In Sweden they teach Muslim men how to hook up with blondes. So now we can use her to teach Western men how to hook up with Muslim women. Right?
http://mashable.com/2017/01/23/inauguration-womens-march-poster-woman/#cxXg6eUPpaqj
Fairey was sued by the photographer who took the photo of Obama that the HOPE poster was based on. I think the photographer had a legitimate grievance, as it appears that Fairey may have just put the photo into Photoshop, desaturated it, adjusted the contrasts, and then used the posterize effect. Granted, there would be some additional cleaning up and finessing, but the photographer deserves most of the credit.
Like Banksy, Fairey benefits greatly from producing images that appeal to the politically correct. He knows his market. (Banksy is more creative than Fairey, though.)
Mashable tittle:
Iconic.
I guess, and according to the grandfather of designational sophistry which Shepard peddles to the sheep, in the future every Fairey’s poster will be iconic for 15 minutes.
The West has just interrupted that fantasy like Phoebe Cates walking in on Judge Reinhold.
I’m not sure whether this is a humblebrag or an admission of desperation, but I can confirm the old line about ugly feminists having submissive fantasies is true.
Do the cute ones? Wouldn’t know
Dat one hillarity site, Mon!
“Sources later confirmed the dip in question was in fact Long Cut, not any of that pouch bullshit.”
Feminism is the spergy female’s way of trying to play hard to get.
Are we submitting to Islam or is Islam submitting to the West?
US and EU are different. EU is right next to Muslim lands and face real danger of demographic imperialism.
US, in contrast, won't have to worry about Muslim immigration. Occasional terrorism yes, but no Muslim takeover. US had more to fear from mass immigration from Latin America and Asia. And its big black population.
Still, it's all connected since the US foreign policy is controlled by globalists who keep messing up the Middle East. If not for US and its encouragement to allies like Saudis, Syrian Civil War would have ended long ago, and there would have been no massive refugee crisis. And Iraq is a mess cuz of US policies.
And then, Obama and Hillary really did it by toppling the Gaffer of Libya.
US and its vassal EU has already submitted to the GLOB. The GLOB has worldwide ambitions, and that means messing up MENA.
GLOB's strategy is invade/invite, esp since the 'humane' face of Invite masks the brutality of the Invade.
This is especially dangerous because a stable North Africa serves as wall between Europe and Sub-Saharan Black Africa.
That was Gaffer's warning and extortion to Europe. He will play watchman IF they pay him. (Erdogan also plays this extortion racket somewhat.) But the fall of the Gaffer really broke the dam.
Muslims should find the image of woman with US-flag veil to be offensive as hell because, since the end of the Cold War, the US has brought more misery to MENA than any other nation.
What is most offensive is the idea that Trump is a bad guy cuz he says NO to 'refugees'.
The Media don't ask WHY THE REFUGEES EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Imagine Hitler invading Poland and then pressing on US to take Polish refugees OR be condemned for its lack of heart.
Imagine Japan invading China and then pressing the US to take Chinese refugees OR be condemned for its lack of humanitarianism.
In order not to fall into the trap set by globalists --- "nationalists are anti-human xenophobes because they say NO to 'refugees' whereas globalists are so caring cuz they say YES" --- , the patriots must press the case of STOP CREATING REFUGEES WITH NEO-IMPERIALIST AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY CONTROLLED BY THE GLOB".
Trump did suggest as much at times by accusing US foreign policy of messing up the region. But patriots must hammer this point home over and over.
Tulsi Gabbard did just this by pointing out that Syrian people are wondering why the US has aided rebranded Alqaeda in Syria.
Now, Conservatives are loathe to do this because they are so slavish to Jewish Power, and that means no condemnation of Neocon foreign policy.
Trump supporters are quick to condemn Muslims but generally don't spell out why the Muslims are on the move in such big numbers.
Also, for patriots, the idea that the US has become an imperialist power is difficult to swallow. But, patriots must go there because true nationalism means not only defense of homeland but respect for the homelands of others as well. And it's been the US, controlled by the GLOB, that's been messing up homelands all over.
“US, in contrast, won’t have to worry about Muslim immigration. Occasional terrorism yes, but no Muslim takeover.”
Not if the anti-Western Left Wing elites have it their way. Michigan has 2 majority Muslim cities, Hamtramck and Dearborn. The Left wants to turn the entire United States into one huge Dearborn/Hamtreamck. Atheist Chinamen, Catholic Latin Americans, and Catholic Filipinos are no longer seen as culturally alien enough by the anti-Western elites. In order to annihilate Western civilization for good you really need an extremely alien group that has a zero percent assimilation rate like Muslims to get the job done.
https://youtu.be/VWX1SKncyOA
Unlike Donald J. Trump and White men in general, Muslim men actually believe in women's rights.
Supports my theory exactly. Today’s white women are not protesting that they may lose their freedoms, they are angry that they have been given those freedoms in the first place. They hate us because we gave them divorce, the pill, abortion, careers– instead of standing up to them like real men. Today’s feminist will tomorrow be in a harem, and she will like it.
I really appreciate a lively discussion on this thread with my post being in moderation for the last 24+ hours. Never mind.
Is there any evidence of a conversion trend?
There’s been some press coverage of a trend of Hispanic conversion to Islam. There’ve also been some celebrity converts like Dave Chapelle and Jemima Goldsmith and a number of rappers.
But what I was getting at is: I can now see as plausible contemporary self-hatred and Islamo-chic added to fear of nuclear terrorism translating into a mass conversion movement.
Like the Latino Rick Moranis in San Bernardino.
But what I was getting at is: I can now see as plausible contemporary self-hatred and Islamo-chic added to fear of nuclear terrorism translating into a mass conversion movement.
“There’s been some press coverage of a trend of Hispanic conversion to Islam.”
Like the Latino Rick Moranis in San Bernardino.