The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
When Did "White" Become an All-Purpose Insult?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

One reason Donald Trump won the election is the increasingly gratuitous usage among white elites of the word “white” as an insult. For example, in the New York Times today, Jennifer Senior approvingly quotes Hillary Clinton’s new book:

Hillary Clinton Opens Up About ‘What Happened,’ With Candor, Defiance and Dark Humor

By JENNIFER SENIOR SEPT. 12, 2017

… “[Trump] doesn’t just like Putin,” she writes. “He seems to want to be like Putin, a white authoritarian leader who could put down dissenters, repress minorities, disenfranchise voters, weaken the press, and amass untold billions for himself.”

Mugabe may be “authoritarian,” but at least he’s not “white authoritarian.”

Why exactly did Hillary insert “white” before “authoritarian” in that sentence? Apparently, Hillary perceives “white authoritarian” to be a worse insult than just plain “authoritarian.”

I guess these days “white” is understood to be a negative intensifier, meaning “very bad.” In the past, readers would have understood “authoritarian” to be bad, but “white” to be neutral. So until recently “white authoritarian” would have been confusing. But now, Hillary’s audience knows that “white” makes “authoritarian” worse, much worse.

In the future, instead of accusing Trump of being a “white authoritarian,” Hillary will accuse the President of being an “authoritarian white.” And, then, he’ll just be accused of being “white,” enough said.

But is it any surprise then that not enough white people voted for Hillary to make her President?

P.S. If I order a Mugabe Jacket, should it have my face on it or Bob’s?

 
Hide 458 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. eah says:
    Read More
    • Replies: @Broski
    The dynamic underlying this chart is human labor being replaced by machines. That, along with global Europa realizing that diversity sucks, will drive History (in the Fukuyama sense) during the 21st century.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    Damn, I hate graphs with y-values other than zero at the bottom! I have to mentally figure where the real x-axis is and then scale off in my head how the curves really relate. I know it's not your graph, eah, but that is no way to make a graph.

    If the BLS or whoever has a point to make, then they should blow up the important part of the curves on another graph, but show the BIG PICTURE first, or they're being duplicitous (sometimes, it's just because the maker of the graph just lets excel or whatever make the axes and is too dumb or lazy to set them right. Oh, US Feral Government. But, of course!)

    OK, enough, and, no, I am not Rantly McTirade's twin brother, but that's one hell of a great handle!
    , @Neoconned
    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/451247/steve-bannon-wrong-george-w-bush-foreign-policy-kept-america-safe-post-911

    THIS IS WHY BANNON WAS LET GO.

    Yeah Ivanka, etc probably had something to do with the technicals but thing about it -- it was the nasty bloodthirsty chickenhawk neocon SCUM who did it. And their freak show assortment of hangers-on, crony capitalist welfare bums, etc who all leaned REAL heavy on Trump and his various "generals" advisers to cut Bannon loose.

    Think about it for a second.

    War is bad for us but great for military contractors. What would Boeing/Halliburton/Raytheon, etc have done if Trump actually started de-escalating the ME and let those people to their own devices and their own natural habits without us being globocop?

    Not many know but the military budget/DoD budget went UP under Obama EVERY SINGLE YEAR of his administration save 2012 or 2013. And in the year it didn't go up -- it didn't go up because Obama wanted it to go up but wanted to pay for it with a TAX INCREASE -- you know -- like how we used to pay for wars with war taxes. But the anarchist-libertarian nutjobs in the GOP tea party movement wanted war financed on the money printer credit card instead. So boom we got a slight cut in the Pentagon budget for a single year.

    To understand the power and influence of this constituency, in 2009 during the dark bowels of the Bush downtown recession EVERYBODY was getting cut. Businesses, etc.

    Guess who didn't? That's right -- the Pentagon had a I believe I recall a 3% budget hike. Thinking back, it may have been more. Like 4-5%. So while everybody else was getting fucked, they were getting stuffed with free cash.

    As I've found out the hard way over the last few years -- NO MATTER WHAT IN OUR SYSTEM -- somebody loses, and somebody wins, "just a matter of who(m)."

    Think about it -- all those military industrial shareholders, industrial trade bodies, to a lesser extent unions, etc -- they all stand to lose TRILLIONS in free USA govt money financed via you and me. Because like the black welfare queen smoking crack in her Section 8 shithole shanty trailer or crackden apartment complex -- what will these corporate welfare types do if the govt teet is suddenly cut off? My God -- they'd have to go out and do what the rest of us suckers do -- WORK for our money and our living with our hands or brains and a combination there of. And that requires EFFORT and more importantly WORK -- and who the fuck wants to do an icky thing like that?

    I should know -- every Sat & Sun mornings I wake up at 4 am and walk a mile to my fast food job where I use bleach to scrub fossilized shit and feces off the toilet bowl. Does it suck? Yeah. But if I didn't do this I literally would be BEGGING ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD WITH A SIGN BECAUSE THERE ARE NO OTHER STINKING JOBS WHERE I LIVE besides being a cop for a lousy $11/hour. And no, I"m not making that up, welcome to the Deep South.

    For that -- I'll stay at my shit $8/hour Mickey D's crap job....

    But think about this -- all those hangers on and welfare bums who make their bread and their cheese off the Pentagon budget doing "contractor work", etc.

    The shame if they actually have to go out and do what I do -- WALK on my 2 feet from one end of town to the other begging people for employment. Work sucks. As it should.

    Not all of us though are dumb enough to see this as a simple left/right argument.

    We need MILITARY TRIALS or in the least FEDERAL murder/treason trials of neocon subversives. These people are SNAKES IN THE GRASS. TRY THEM BEFORE A JURY OF THEIR PEERS and them HANG OR SHOOT THEM DEAD.

    Don't send them to Israel or some far off locale, don't jail them, don't allow them to breathe. They have blood on their hands and Bannon fucked up thinking he could be a gentleman around these people when they've already shown time & again that not only are they bloodthirsty -- but they'll murder civilians to keep their pscyhotic wars and ME graft scam game going.....

    WE NEED TRIALS. RUTHLESSNESS IS OUR ONLY OPTION AT THIS POINT. And please, stop going after minorities or Jews or w/ever. Most minorities are just dumber versions of us. Working proles in the same boat we are in. This is a war against neocon elites. And if we don't start talking blood and trials -- then we will continue to lose with our tail between our legs. Look how Trump got his ass handed to him and now he talks like a gelded cuck.

    The neocons have to BE PURGED and PUT ON TRIAL. No other solution will satiate the country's ills. Every other issue is background noise before then.

    "This threat has receded as Trump has quite wisely ditched his isolationist campaign rhetoric, expanding American military efforts in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan.

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/451247/steve-bannon-wrong-george-w-bush-foreign-policy-kept-america-safe-post-911""

    So in other words -- Trump was forced over or bought over by the neocons. These people are the single de facto number one threat to the national security and physical and political integrity of our country, money supply, future and vitality. They MUST be brought to justice and purged from the Trump White HOuse.
    , @Neoconned
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/12/artificial-intelligence-face-recognition-michal-kosinski

    Hey Steve, never mind gayface.....seems your iq, political leanings, criminal disposition & other things will soon be recognisable based on ai.....

    Expect insurance companies to compile the data to create profiles on individuals. Surely it will be shared w the cops and spooks. Phillip K Dick will be revealed to be even more of a genius than he already is thought of....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /isteve/when-did-white-become-a-gratuitous-insult/#comment-2002919
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. jackson says:

    OT: have you heard about the recent LAPD cadet scandal (cadets stealing patrol cars and weapons)?

    Also, have you seen the demographics of the cadets lately? See here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    This picture is larger: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBapsirUMAAzdhs.jpg:large
    , @bomag
    Pretty uninspiring photo for future policeman; half look overweight.

    Not quite half appear female.

    , @Hibernian
    I'm reminded of a Rodney Dangerfield (R.I.P.) line, "When I was a kid, our neighborhood was so tough that we stole cop cars...[dramatic pause]...with the cops in em'!"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. The elites seem completely unaware how grating their usage of “white” is. It shows how deeply trapped they are in their own little bubble.

    Read More
    • Agree: Desiderius, NickG
    • Replies: @Maj. Kong
    I'm old enough to recall the "epistemic closure" meme that was spread after the 2012 defeat. The most disgusting thing the left did in 2012 was the "White People mourning Romney" Tumblrism. Their reveling in open anti-white racism (thinking an amnesty and permanent one party rule was right around the corner). That's what sent me out of mainstream WF Buckley conservatism, and into White Identity Politics.
    , @Cagey Beast
    We get a window into their world via YouTube videos of the conferences and luncheons they post without thought as to how they appear to others. It's a team-building gesture and ice-breaker to make a few little jokes at the expense of those benighted White people who lack the money or connections to be there with them. "The absent are always wrong" or "those absent are never without fault while those present are never without excuses" as the sayings go.
    , @Pat Boyle
    I think all this naked hatred against whites is a big mistake for blacks. East Asians with some justice feel they are equal or superior so you don't get much contempt for white accomplishment from them. Hispanics want the goose that lays those golden eggs so they too are circumspect. But Americans blacks no longer bother too conceal their desire to slaughter all whites.

    Let's face it blacks have not worked out in America. Lincoln, Jefferson and Washington never could believe that blacks could ever be social equals to whites. As it turns out - they were right.

    Since the sixties America has embraced a kind of optimism about prospects for racial blending. But all the evidence for the success of racial equality is negative.

    There is a story earlier in this blog thread about America's opioid epidemic. It testifies to the hopelessness that young black men feel. I'm sure its correct. Probably the best way to interpret the black on black shooting that we see in Baltimore, Detroit and Chicago is that it is a new form of suicide - suicide by proxy. The social scientists refuse to believe it but the black kids in the ghetto know the odds against them ever becoming a normal member of society. So they shoot heroin into their arms and shoot their gun at other blacks.

    Meanwhile the white liberals and black militants become increasingly more strident. They have grants and maybe even tenure. They are a long way from the grim realities of street black life. So they indulge in nasty panegyrics against white people. They feel better for this. Most other blacks have no outlet for their frustration. They at least can scream.

    But hating whites is not cost-free. We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people. We know that the famous Nazi genocide of the Jews was done by white people. So no should doubt that whites can be very nasty indeed. It is in the best long term interest of blacks to cool it - to mollify whites and hope for some answer to emerge. The present course of white liberals and black radicals to spew undiluted hatred at whites looks to me to be another suicide gesture.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @jackson
    OT: have you heard about the recent LAPD cadet scandal (cadets stealing patrol cars and weapons)?

    Also, have you seen the demographics of the cadets lately? See here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Maj. Kong
    It looks like single digits of white cadets.

    That isn't America.

    #Calexit
    , @DcThrowback
    Trust but verify, please provide a link to a piece or something that shows that's legit.

    Some weird things about it:
    1/ that's a monster graduating class
    2/ different uniforms, lapd graduations via google show all cadets in black
    3/ march's graduating class had 30 ppl in it (18 hispanics tho, so....)

    http://www.lapdonline.org/home/news_view/61976
    , @Rod1963
    By the looks there are a lot of fatties in the group. It's clear physical conditioning isn't part of the course work.

    When they hit the streets criminals won't have to worry about foot pursuits.
    , @Currahee
    I don't believe this photo is genuine. Give me proof as to source.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Arguably in this case Hillary is trying to play up the story that Putin is some kind of “white nationalist”. Erdogan is also ethnically/genetically very much a “white” guy but I can’t imagine Hillary calling him a “white authoritarian.”

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn’t give a damn about “white identity”, he is a statist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is indeed a nationalist, but not a "white nationalist". He is a Russian nationalist. Russians are not all necessarily all that white-there are Asian and Middle Eastern admixtures in much of the Greater Russian population-but VV Putin does not care about that.

    If it's Russian, he's for it. If he thinks it's bad for Russia, he's against it. Very simple.

    He has a simple yardstick. Oh sure, he likes to wield power, and he is no ascetic or monk. He is very wealthy. But if he thinks it's bad for Russia and Russians no amount of money would sway him.

    I think Trump is a decent person in many ways, but Putin is a far more serious, a far more powerful man. I doubt America will ever really have a Putin.

    Damn shame, really.
    , @Declane
    Just out of curiosity I googled the president of Mexico to see how white he looked. He looks as white as the average Italian-American in my neighborhood. It's funny how people talk about Mexicans and racism and all that without ever acknowledging that there are basically two races in Mexico - the ones with a drop of native blood and the ones with a bucket.

    But he is 5'7" so at least he shows his solidarity with his lessers by not reaching his full European height.
    , @Desiderius
    Of a particular state. That's the point. Globalists are worse if you care about America because they want an end to all states.
    , @Cagey Beast
    Putin sees himself as an ethnic Russian running the multi-ethnic Russian Federation. That's the hand Russia has had to play for centuries. Putin and his supporters have wrapped their minds around this and it's of no import whether Stormfront types have managed to do the same. Putin is not an ethnic nationalist in the narrow, nasty 19th and 20th century form. He seems much more like an Austrian in the Austro-Hungarian Empire if that had managed to become a republic. That's probably a better model for Whites going forward anyway.

    Our wise and kind managerial classes have used mass exotic immigration to give us a bunch of quickly thrown together modern versions of the Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian Empires to live in whether we want it or not. Putin's Russianness may be a good template for American Whiteness.

    , @TheUmpteenthGermanOnHere
    Yeah, that claim by Clinton is just mendacious. Or is Ramzan Kadyrov now mobilizing against Putin? Obviously then it would have to be true.
    , @Dr. X

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn’t give a damn about “white identity”, he is a statist.
     
    Yeah, but Putin is a "statist" in a lily-white country. Ergo, Russian nationalism is white Russian nationalism. You don't see him importing Syrians, Turks, Pakistanis and Africans like Merkel and May, do you?
    , @Thea
    He is a Russian nationalist who has invited ethnic Russians back home to get free land in the Far East if they raise a Russian family there. He is a good role model for the type of leader we need but don't have. We don't want him as our leader, we want an definitively American version of Putin. Or Netenyahu.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Realist says:

    “When Did “White” Become an All-Purpose Insult?”

    When stupid whites allowed it.

    Read More
    • Agree: Cagey Beast
    • Replies: @TheBoom
    Yes, only whites will not only allow their skin color/ethnicity to be used as an insult, many will encourage it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. LondonBob says:

    Might be a slip, she considers authoritarian leaders to be non white, a trait of the less evolved races.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Peter Akuleyev
    Arguably in this case Hillary is trying to play up the story that Putin is some kind of "white nationalist". Erdogan is also ethnically/genetically very much a "white" guy but I can't imagine Hillary calling him a "white authoritarian."

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn't give a damn about "white identity", he is a statist.

    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is indeed a nationalist, but not a “white nationalist”. He is a Russian nationalist. Russians are not all necessarily all that white-there are Asian and Middle Eastern admixtures in much of the Greater Russian population-but VV Putin does not care about that.

    If it’s Russian, he’s for it. If he thinks it’s bad for Russia, he’s against it. Very simple.

    He has a simple yardstick. Oh sure, he likes to wield power, and he is no ascetic or monk. He is very wealthy. But if he thinks it’s bad for Russia and Russians no amount of money would sway him.

    I think Trump is a decent person in many ways, but Putin is a far more serious, a far more powerful man. I doubt America will ever really have a Putin.

    Damn shame, really.

    Read More
    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Chase
    For the United States to produce a Putin, we will have to go through extreme turmoil, similar to Russia in the 90's. I wouldn't bet against it at some point, but not before much pain and death.
    , @Guy de Champlagne
    Yeah Putin is such a great leader that he's almost gotten Russian life expectancy back up to soviet levels. What a man!
    , @Anatoly Karlin

    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is indeed a nationalist, but not a “white nationalist”. He is a Russian nationalist.
     
    Putin triangulates between economic and ideological blocs, with nationalists being one of several other influential ones.

    Although he throws a bone - not to mention the occasional kick - to Russian nationalists now and then, that does not make him one himself.
    , @bored identity



    "... I doubt America will ever really have a Putin. "

     

    Who cares?!

    bored would believes that even some ten years from now, President Miller with his young Veep Yair Netanyahu could still reverse Hussein's Pendelum and save our Union- along with the State 51. Area.

    Of course, there will be blood, but...



    “To put things in perspective,” Netanyahu wrote on Facebook, “I’m a Jew, I’m an Israeli, the neo nazis scums [sic] in Virginia hate me and my country.

    But they belong to the past.

    Their breed is dying out.

    “However the thugs of Antifa and [Black Lives Matter] who hate my country (and America too in my view) just as much are getting stronger and stronger and becoming super dominant in American universities and public life.”


    http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-junior-says-leftists-more-dangerous-than-neo-nazis/

     

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/alien-reptile-and-cloaked-figure-in-yair-netanyahus-meme-have-old-new-origins/
    , @Dmitry134564
    Putin sucks in a lot of ways as well - he is a man of late Soviet mentality. Russia is very unprepared for the future peak and decline in oil demand, despite having had the last 17 years of oil bonanza to prepare for it (half-hearted flops like Skolkovo aside).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. I don’t think it’s an intensifier. It’s intended to convey that no authoritarian can ever be white in a world she would not protest against having to live in. It’s an apostate Goldwater Girl’s purethink.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Lot says:

    Before “white” was an insult, it was “white bread.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Before “white” was an insult, it was “white bread.”
     
    The trope lives on! In name-brand form here:

    Slated to play Che Guevara is Constantine Maroulis, a former “American Idol’’ contestant who earned a Tony Award nomination for his performance on Broadway in “Rock of Ages.’’ Maroulis is Greek-American. In a recent Globe interview, Maroulis said he believes concerns about him playing Che are not justified. Saying “I’m not exactly a loaf of Wonder Bread,’’ he cited the discrimination encountered by his grandparents when they immigrated to the United States.
     
    , @songbird
    I recall Welcome Back, Kotter's POC characters using that term a lot. Informally, it seemed to be a bigger hit among Jewish people. Myself, it just made me think: I'm supposed to enjoy a sitcom that insults me? (which is different from one making a funny ethnic joke.)
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Before “white” was an insult, it was “white bread.”
     
    Of course, it was whites, not nonwhites, who led the trend against (literal) white bread.

    The blacks I knew called it "light bread". though. Hmm...
    , @Loafy
    Ya damned cracker...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. AndrewR says:

    Anti-white rhetoric in general seemed to skyrocket around 2012.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    A magical new era was supposed to bloom once the Mocha One was in the White House as President of Earth. That did not happen and so someone had to be blamed. Tinkerbell died and so some of you little White MFs must not have clapped hard enough.
    , @Joe Sweet
    Yep. Just as Obama was catching his stride.

    I noticed it in 2011 when I was hanging around with a Philosophy adjunct professor who's 7/16 native ancestry, femaleness, Judeophilia, and shameless fag-haggery apparently granted her the privilege to use white as an epithet despite the fact that she looked pretty white and all of her tastes landed squarely in the SWPL category. This must have been fairly early in the explicit white bashing juggernaut because at that time many of her facebook "friends" spoke up in their own defense in reaction to her posts that impugned something as being "so white." I doubt liberal white facebookers stand up for themselves like that these days.

    , @David In TN
    When Obama was reelected in 2012, left-liberals figured it was time (and safe) to drop the mask of affability and give vent to their venomous hatred.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Declane says:
    @Peter Akuleyev
    Arguably in this case Hillary is trying to play up the story that Putin is some kind of "white nationalist". Erdogan is also ethnically/genetically very much a "white" guy but I can't imagine Hillary calling him a "white authoritarian."

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn't give a damn about "white identity", he is a statist.

    Just out of curiosity I googled the president of Mexico to see how white he looked. He looks as white as the average Italian-American in my neighborhood. It’s funny how people talk about Mexicans and racism and all that without ever acknowledging that there are basically two races in Mexico – the ones with a drop of native blood and the ones with a bucket.

    But he is 5’7″ so at least he shows his solidarity with his lessers by not reaching his full European height.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JohnnyD
    Jorge Ramos plays the same game. He has blue eyes and relatively pale skin, but claims to be fighting white supremacy.
    , @AndrewR
    The Mexican elites, who tend to be much whiter than the average Mexican, promote the colonization of the US and interference in its policies. They get to export their surplus population, reduce political pressure on the Mexican government to fix problems in Mexico, get money injected into the economy through remittances and get increased political control of their northern colony.

    It's hard to blame Mexican elites for this. It's a win/win/win for them. And obviously certain Americans benefit from having tens of millions of (relatively) docile, hard-working Mexicans who don't demand high wages. But there are tens of millions of Americams who don't benefit in any way from Mexican colonization yet still support it wholeheartedly. SUPPORT OUR DREAMERS WOOOOOOOO!!!

    , @Frau Katze
    Some fraction of Mexicans (I don't know the figures) are of 100% European descent.
    , @Wency
    Steve coined the term "Conquistador-American" for this phenomenon.

    Part of the implication is that some white Mexican-Americans have managed to claim affirmative action and the right to speak for "oppressed native peoples" while benefiting from a bloodline composed entirely of the oppressors themselves. Win-win!
    , @Anonymous
    Average male height in Spain is about 5'8" or 5'9".
    , @PV van der Byl
    Vicente Fox, Mexican president from 2000 to 2006 is 6'5''. He's mighty white, too.
    , @Avery
    Former President of Mexico Vincente Fox with Spain's Felipe Borbon.
    In the picture, 'Mexican' Fox actually looks slightly whiter than Spaniard de Borbon.
    And Vincente is 6'4".
    Your typical Aztec.

    http://www.gettyimages.in/detail/news-photo/prince-felipe-de-borbon-and-wife-letizia-ortiz-pose-for-a-news-photo/51078436#prince-felipe-de-borbon-and-wife-letizia-ortiz-pose-for-a-picture-picture-id51078436
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. map says:

    “White” as an epithet is a function of liberals not believing in truth, yet having to still be convincing to people. When one does not believe in truth, then the only way to be convincing is to make arguments “against interest.” Hillary perceives that being anti-white will endear her to others because she thinks she will be convincing by attacking herself or arguing against her own perceived interest. We’re supposed to be so impressed by these self-criticizing acts, that we immediately fall to our knees to worship these “leaders.”

    I’d be more impressed if these self-criticizers simply offed themselves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dube
    "map," thanks for what seems a fruitful analysis.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. hhsiii says:

    Who is her ghostwriter? Presumably she approved that after her 4th pre-5:00 Chardonnay. The only white she appreciates.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chrisnonymous
    pre-5:00? Man, she gets up early for breakfast.
    , @Pat Boyle
    I have recently discovered an $8.00 Chardonnay that tastes like a $30.00 Chardonnay. But I won't tell you what it is, lest you buy it all up.
    , @Bill Jones
    You don't think she's an aficionado of a White Russian?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Maj. Kong says:
    @Anonymous
    This picture is larger: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBapsirUMAAzdhs.jpg:large

    It looks like single digits of white cadets.

    That isn’t America.

    #Calexit

    Read More
    • Replies: @JW Bell
    Those are photos of a high school youth program, http://www.lapdcadets.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Maj. Kong says:
    @Peter Akuleyev
    The elites seem completely unaware how grating their usage of "white" is. It shows how deeply trapped they are in their own little bubble.

    I’m old enough to recall the “epistemic closure” meme that was spread after the 2012 defeat. The most disgusting thing the left did in 2012 was the “White People mourning Romney” Tumblrism. Their reveling in open anti-white racism (thinking an amnesty and permanent one party rule was right around the corner). That’s what sent me out of mainstream WF Buckley conservatism, and into White Identity Politics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    You could say that declaring victory prematurely is a common failure of the Left, but you have to understand that the reason that they do it is that they see themselves as being on "the right side of history" and that so often their declarations of victory succeed in creating facts on the ground.

    This usually works (see gay marriage), and usually they are able to suppress any visible white/traditionalist backlash - anyone who protests at being placed upon the garbage heap of history is declared to be a Nazi and doxxed. Unfortunately for Hillary we still have the secret ballot though I predict that Leftists will go after that soon. Aren't we entitled to know how you voted so we can know not to hire you? Why should fascists be allowed to hide their fascist beliefs behind the curtain of the voting booth?

    , @guest
    St. Trayvon of the Skittles was martyred shortly before the 2012 election. In fact, I'm almost certain that was a national news story because of the election. That's what turned me, along with reading Jared Taylor around the same time.

    The left called forth Nemesis that year, but didn't learn about it until 4 years later

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. @Lot
    Before "white" was an insult, it was "white bread."

    Before “white” was an insult, it was “white bread.”

    The trope lives on! In name-brand form here:

    Slated to play Che Guevara is Constantine Maroulis, a former “American Idol’’ contestant who earned a Tony Award nomination for his performance on Broadway in “Rock of Ages.’’ Maroulis is Greek-American. In a recent Globe interview, Maroulis said he believes concerns about him playing Che are not justified. Saying “I’m not exactly a loaf of Wonder Bread,’’ he cited the discrimination encountered by his grandparents when they immigrated to the United States.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Autochthon
    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.

    What the Hell is wrong with these people? This stuff is empirical and uncontroversial; they are literally defying reality.
    , @Joe Sweet
    along those same lines...Here's George Clooney defending his current movie at the SWPL Olympiad known as the Toronto International Film Festival against charges of tone-deaf portrayal of blacks (and other race issues in Hollywood).

    http://www.indiewire.com/2017/09/george-clooney-interview-suburbicon-diversity-hollywood-1201874750/


    “Of course, Charlottesville happens, because every few years Charlottesville happens again,” he said. “We keep forgetting that we haven’t excised that original sin completely. When I was growing up in Kentucky, the civil-rights movement had its big wave and segregation was exorcised from this country. We really felt like we were on this trajectory toward it all being finished. It wasn’t something you thought would be around. It’s a surprise that it’s still a part of our world.”

    As a filmmaker, Clooney said it took years for him to tackle race because he had yet to find the right project. “A lot of people ask me why I haven’t done any movies about Darfur or South Sudan,” he said, recalling his advocacy in the region. “Well, I haven’t found the script that’s right to do it. My personal life and where I go — philanthropic things — have always been toward whatever is inclusive, not exclusive. That’s always been an important part of my life. It’s just hard to find those films.”

    But Clooney added that he would rather see more minority filmmakers work their way into the industry, echoing the rise of Mexican filmmakers in Hollywood over a decade ago —the so-called “Three Amigos” of Alfonso Cuaron, Alejandro Gonzalez Iñarritu, and Guillermo del Toro, whose “The Shape of Water” just won the Golden Lion at the Venice International Film Festival.

    “All these great Mexican filmmakers showed up, it was like, fuck, this is great filmmaking,” Clooney said. “That’s what I’d like to see… some really interesting young filmmakers out there. You want to feel something fresh and new constantly. You want people pushing the limits. There’s a way to make things much cheaper now so there are a lot of different voices out there.”
     

    What a nitwit. He apparently thinks because these three Mexican directors have names similar to the guys who do the yard work at his LA mansion that they look like his gardeners too. There's nothing "minority" about those three amigos unless you are taking the global view and are recognizing that whites are a minority.

    http://www.trbimg.com/img-54e7f3ee/turbine/la-apphoto-fox-s-golden-globe-awards-party1-jpg-20150220/1150/1150x647

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. @Peter Akuleyev
    Arguably in this case Hillary is trying to play up the story that Putin is some kind of "white nationalist". Erdogan is also ethnically/genetically very much a "white" guy but I can't imagine Hillary calling him a "white authoritarian."

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn't give a damn about "white identity", he is a statist.

    Of a particular state. That’s the point. Globalists are worse if you care about America because they want an end to all states.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. JackOH says:

    Let me try for a “big picture-y” rationale for White as a negative intensifier. Reductio ad Hitlerum.

    The Greatest Generation returns from WWII congratulating itself for having whooped Hitler’s arse. Unable to disinterestedly view Hitler’s early career as a fairly benign and successful architect of national revival and national solidarity, that Greatest Generation itself becomes vulnerable to charges of racial animus and imperial aggrandizement lodged by America’s Left who see their main chance in the Greatest Generation’s complacency, even smugness. Bewildered, the Greatest Generation, ordinary men and women with traditional ties to church and family and country, are ideologically equated with the Hitler they defeated. Hitler, of course, was cheerleader for a political party with a virulent and explicit racialist wing.

    America’s Left saw its opportunity in eliding the difference between most Whites’ cordial but wary relations between Blacks, and the Nazis’ attitude toward disfavored underclasses.

    So White equals negative intensifier . . . because Hitler and Nazis. The chances of some national reevaluation of Hitler and the Nazis, which is what might be needed to end the plague of nasty and unending Leftishness, is probably zip point squat because of its massive unpalatability.

    Morning coffee’s kicking in. Thanks for allowing this comment.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Langley
    Why did/does the US vilify Hitler and Himler but not Hirohito and Tojo?
    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it's used against Japan.
    , @bomag

    America’s Left saw its opportunity in eliding the difference between most Whites’ cordial but wary relations between Blacks, and the Nazis’ attitude toward disfavored underclasses.
     
    Some of that.

    Part of it is that "Whites" were marketed as the ultimate can-do class that was going to fix all the world's problems. That the problems persist leads to blaming and shaming of those in power and a call for their replacement.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. White women consider White men their men and the global village to be their village.

    We all naturally think at the social scale of the village but this is doubly true for women. White women don’t really care what the Arab, African or Chinese families in the global village do; they care about policing, shaming and (hopefully) uplifting their own children and men. Saudis and Chinese can publicly execute prisoners ’till the cows come home and White ladies will barely wrinkle their little noses but if “that man!” Putin takes his shirt off while fishing then their whole day is ruined. Putin is sort of the brother-in-law of Hillary’s cousin in the global village and so it’s her job to shame and police him. “I don’t care what the Arabs do! In this family we’re nice to gays!”.

    This White lady world-view is fine and dandy at the level of the literal village but will be the death of us at the level of the mythical global village. Hillary Clinton, Madeline Albright and Samantha Power are the bossy Lady Bountifuls from the manor going around town shaming “their” men and uplifting the poor. Long story short, this is why we need to keep our ladies out of high level politics until they have the friend and enemy distinctions made perfectly clear to them.

    Read More
    • Agree: Autochthon, Sayless
    • Replies: @Jake
    I think your assessment is correct. Whites are the near antithesis of the people directly addressed in Matthew 7: 3-5. Jesus talks about people whose first, and perhaps nearly only, instinct is to focus on even the smallest problem with other folks, and batter them, while ignoring their own much worse faults.

    Whites, meaning in this case Gentiles of European background, tend to be as you note: led by overly socially fastidious women, they will browbeat their own for little motes while ignoring not merely beams, but beams with gigantic spikes smeared in feces, that protrude from the eyes of non-whites and non-Christians.

    Those whites are as screwed up and WRONG as are the people on the other end of the pendulum that Jesus specifically condemns. In fact, whites being this way make those people much worse.

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    Long story short, this is why we need to keep our ladies out of high level politics until they have the friend and enemy distinctions made perfectly clear to them .

    There, Fixed It For You, as those people on the internet like to say.
    , @Kylie
    "Saudis and Chinese can publicly execute prisoners ’till the cows come home and White ladies will barely wrinkle their little noses but if “that man!” Putin takes his shirt off while fishing then their whole day is ruined. "

    I'm all in favor of public executions (for crimes like murder and rape) and a shirtless Putin (while fishing or at any other time).

    Women, whether or not they're white and/or ladies, need to stay out of politics and anything to do with public policy. Women never seem content merely to govern, they insist on ruling.
    , @AnotherDad

    This White lady world-view is fine and dandy at the level of the literal village but will be the death of us at the level of the mythical global village. Hillary Clinton, Madeline Albright and Samantha Power are the bossy Lady Bountifuls from the manor going around town shaming “their” men and uplifting the poor.
     
    This is a thing, but I don't think it's the main thing.

    #1, i'd say, is just that women's core instinct is "nurture". And this is a fine--in fact critical--personal instinct--nurturing your own kids--and even scales out to the village--volunteer in the schools--but is a poor overall political instinct.

    Welfare mom having another kid--we can't let that baby starve!

    Dead kid on the beach--oh, must let in the refugees!

    Refugees drowning at sea--must rescue those poor desperate refugees.

    Dead kids in Aleppo--must take Syrian refugees! or--the Hillary, busier body version--must shoot down their airplanes, including Russians if necessary!

    Illegal alien kids--can't send those poor innocents back!

    Mentally ill young homo thinks he's a girl--don't be a meany, she should be allowed in the girls locker room!

    Someone, somewhere said something disparaging about someone--bad, bad person! they shouldn't be allowed to speak!


    Again there's nothing wrong wit a nurturing instinct. We benefit greatly that women have it. But most political questions are not fundamentally about "nurture" they are "protection of nation", "protection of civilization", "justice", "rule of law", "getting the incentives right" and properly guided by reason not emotion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. @Peter Akuleyev
    Arguably in this case Hillary is trying to play up the story that Putin is some kind of "white nationalist". Erdogan is also ethnically/genetically very much a "white" guy but I can't imagine Hillary calling him a "white authoritarian."

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn't give a damn about "white identity", he is a statist.

    Putin sees himself as an ethnic Russian running the multi-ethnic Russian Federation. That’s the hand Russia has had to play for centuries. Putin and his supporters have wrapped their minds around this and it’s of no import whether Stormfront types have managed to do the same. Putin is not an ethnic nationalist in the narrow, nasty 19th and 20th century form. He seems much more like an Austrian in the Austro-Hungarian Empire if that had managed to become a republic. That’s probably a better model for Whites going forward anyway.

    Our wise and kind managerial classes have used mass exotic immigration to give us a bunch of quickly thrown together modern versions of the Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian Empires to live in whether we want it or not. Putin’s Russianness may be a good template for American Whiteness.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Peter Akuleyev
    I agree. Putin (and citizens of the RF in general) subscribes to the melting pot theory of assimilating minorities that worked pretty well for the US until the 1960s, worked better than people think in the USSR and is still working well for China. Russia has the largest Muslim population, both in percentage and absolute numbers, of any country in Europe, but for the most part they don't create problems. Russian culture is firmly established as the Leitkultur and minorities are free to celebrate elements of their own culture but it is understood that if push comes to shove the majority culture holds sway.
    , @Dmitry134564
    In Russia today, national minorities generally have priorities over the national majority, everything is suppressed by happy national media, much of government work is mediating between interests of differing oligarch demands, and the industries they run, and certain difficult future situations (such as a massively growing Muslim demographics, or even a certain Muslim (ex-Jihadist) prince of a certain federal subject extorting huge federal wealth transfers, is brushed under the carpet). Not sure if it's a good role model for the United States. If anything, Russia, like Brazil, is one of the few countries which makes the US look functional by comparison.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. @Peter Akuleyev
    Arguably in this case Hillary is trying to play up the story that Putin is some kind of "white nationalist". Erdogan is also ethnically/genetically very much a "white" guy but I can't imagine Hillary calling him a "white authoritarian."

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn't give a damn about "white identity", he is a statist.

    Yeah, that claim by Clinton is just mendacious. Or is Ramzan Kadyrov now mobilizing against Putin? Obviously then it would have to be true.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. She means that he is a white authoritarian in contrast to wonderful black authoritarians from history like Sideshow Bob Mugabe or Mobutu Sese Seko Kuku Ngbendu Wa Za Banga

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. JW Bell says:
    @Maj. Kong
    It looks like single digits of white cadets.

    That isn't America.

    #Calexit

    Those are photos of a high school youth program, http://www.lapdcadets.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @jackson
    Yes, a high school youth program in which promising youngsters steal squad cars, impersonate LAPD officers, crash the cars in high-speed pursuits while attempting to flee real officers, and steal weapons and body armor from police stations.

    How long can this city hold up? Any ideas, Steve?

    , @JeremiahJohnbalaya
    And here are the cadets: slideshow here, sample here.

    Wow, LA is brown.
    , @Tiny Duck
    THIS is what America looks like
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. @AndrewR
    Anti-white rhetoric in general seemed to skyrocket around 2012.

    A magical new era was supposed to bloom once the Mocha One was in the White House as President of Earth. That did not happen and so someone had to be blamed. Tinkerbell died and so some of you little White MFs must not have clapped hard enough.

    Read More
    • LOL: AndrewR
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. @hhsiii
    Who is her ghostwriter? Presumably she approved that after her 4th pre-5:00 Chardonnay. The only white she appreciates.

    pre-5:00? Man, she gets up early for breakfast.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. jackson says:
    @JW Bell
    Those are photos of a high school youth program, http://www.lapdcadets.com

    Yes, a high school youth program in which promising youngsters steal squad cars, impersonate LAPD officers, crash the cars in high-speed pursuits while attempting to flee real officers, and steal weapons and body armor from police stations.

    How long can this city hold up? Any ideas, Steve?

    Read More
    • Replies: @BB753
    No ideas except maybe turn it into a video-game. California can't be fixed anymore.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. An evil man becomes president. Please rank the following in order of most to least likely.

    A) He defeated Hillary Clinton.
    B) He colluded with Russia.
    C) He’s an authoritarian.
    D) He’s a white authoritarian.
    E) He is literally Hitler.

    (Who’s gonna get C and D wrong?)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. Why exactly did Hillary insert “white” before “authoritarian” in that sentence?

    Nobody says “white swan”. We say “swan” and “black swan”. So, no doubt, this was just another example of Hillary’s racism. After all, she is one of those “Beckys,” isn’t she?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. Anonym says:

    The best way to inculcate a white racial solidarity and consciousness is to keep up the anti-white hate. This disrespect makes excellent grist for the propaganda mill, especially from someone as loathsome as Hillary.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. Randal says:

    Well it was 2001 when a card-carrying member of the UK great and good, Greg Dyke (former chairman of The Football Association, former Director-General of the BBC, former TV executive, long-time Labour supporter and Blairite, later Liberal Democrat), revealed just how internalised the “white is bad” dogma had become amongst our social elites, when he famously described the national state television service as being “hideously white”.

    So it’s certainly nothing new over here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. @Peter Akuleyev
    The elites seem completely unaware how grating their usage of "white" is. It shows how deeply trapped they are in their own little bubble.

    We get a window into their world via YouTube videos of the conferences and luncheons they post without thought as to how they appear to others. It’s a team-building gesture and ice-breaker to make a few little jokes at the expense of those benighted White people who lack the money or connections to be there with them. “The absent are always wrong” or “those absent are never without fault while those present are never without excuses” as the sayings go.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. BB753 says:
    @jackson
    Yes, a high school youth program in which promising youngsters steal squad cars, impersonate LAPD officers, crash the cars in high-speed pursuits while attempting to flee real officers, and steal weapons and body armor from police stations.

    How long can this city hold up? Any ideas, Steve?

    No ideas except maybe turn it into a video-game. California can’t be fixed anymore.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Maj. Kong
    Buckets of Chinese (and soon Indian) money say otherwise.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Did you guys hear the Ms. America Pageant final questions this year?

    “There are multiple investigations into whether Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia on the election. Well, did they? You’re the jury: guilty or innocent? And please explain your verdict.”

    “Last month, a demonstration of neo-Nazis, white supremacists and the KKK in Charlottesville, Va., turned violent and a counterprotester was killed. The president said there was shared blame with ‘very fine people’ on both sides. Were there? Tell me yes or no, and explain.”

    “One hundred ninety-five countries signed the Paris agreement, in which each country sets nonbinding goals to reduce man-made climate change. The U.S. is withdrawing from the agreement, citing negligible environmental effects and negative economic impact. Good decision? Bad decision? Which is it and why?”

    “A recent poll found slightly over half of Americans favored leaving Confederate statues in place, while others want them removed. Keep them or get rid of them? What’s your vote and why?”

    “Given the evidence that concussions from playing football can cause brain damage, would you support legislation that outlaws full-contact football in elementary and high school? Yes or no, and why?”

    http://www.nola.com/tv/index.ssf/2017/09/miss_america_interview_questio.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    "Did you guys hear the Ms. America Pageant final questions this year?..... "

    This is leftism at its finest. It squeezes its way into everything, everything is a political lesson on what they view is right, all is distorted, everything is a test to weed out the dissenters.

    I remember getting a look at one point at an English textbook used to teach during Maoist China. Interestingly, just about every page had a sentence somewhere in it teaching the tenements of Communism, praising the Communist government, or being a good worker, etc. I'm sick of this BS going on here. These fools want to live this way, go to North Korea. Leave everyone else the h*ll alone.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. It is interesting to speculate on just when this — “the increasingly gratuitous usage among white elites of the word ‘white’ as an insult” — happened.

    My theory is that Obama’s eight year reign of terror was the imprimatur the good whites needed to turn “white” into a moral stigma. Completely aligned with Obama (the black super-hero) was the massive block of opinion-attitude entities — MSM, entertainment industry, academia. Obama’s presidency — so the story-line goes — was not only wonderful, but inevitable. And so, it is now time for whites to quit complaining, except their inferior status and step aside. The insults are embedded in the new progressive order, part of the pay back. Hillary tried to be Obama II but for obvious reasons couldn’t pull it off. The Dems now are shopping around to find a more suitable choice for 2020. Recently I saw a piece by Douglas Schoen, former Clinton pollster, in the Hill, I think, “arguing” that Michelle Obama is the best Democrat to beat Trump. Makes sense, sort of.

    See: https://www.amren.com/news/2017/03/exterminationist-left-happy-trails-zimbabwe/

    Read More
    • Replies: @jim jones
    Reddit thinks that Chelsea would be a good candidate:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6zm07r/they_will_get_chelsea_to_run_for_literally/
    , @Mr. Blank
    Yeah, that's my take, too. Obama's election in 2008, and especially his re-election in 2012 over uber-white Mitt Romney, caused Dems to jump the gun and assume the long-promised multicultural millenium was at hand. They assumed it was safe to drop the mask.

    Trump's election merely caused them to double down. If Trump wins re-election, it will be for exactly that reason.

    At that point, I'd expect Dems to belatedly realize that even if they're not a majority, white people will continue to be the dominant force in American politics, and constantly insulting them and wishing for their deaths probably isn't a smart strategy.

    If Trump loses...well, all bets are off.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    An awful lot to unpack in that Freudian or not so Freudian slip by Hillary Clinton.

    Deep – devilishly deep, involving projection, transference, psychology, history, semantics etc – and plain old school-yard bullying, chicken pecking orders, the ‘ecstasy of disavowal’ – and the sheer animal primeval self-preservation desire to save one’s own skin by not mere joining the bully-pack but instigating it instead.

    A few examples. The ‘gods’ of a defeated people become the ‘devils’ of the conquerors. The self named designation of a defeated ethny, tribe, people etc either becomes a derogatory word in the language of the conquerors or the description of the servile class in society.

    Hence, the English word ‘villain’ meaning ‘offender’ originally only meant ‘peasant’ in the sense of defeated Anglo-Saxon versus Norman Lord.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. NickG says:

    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview, said that Hillary is not very bright. I think he is right.

    Combine this with her being in a filter bubble, it seems likely that she, and hopefully the Dems too, cannot resist doubling down on identity politics, with whites as the bogey man. Being whites themselves, they see being ostentatiously anti white as a status symbol. They are running some weird combination of primate dominance display, combined with a bird of paradise like virtue signal. No doubt Jordan Peterson could wax lyrical on what’s going on.

    They seem not to understand cause and effect….of karma. Identity politics begets identity politics and whites are, ever so gently for now, starting to play. The Dems themselves have and still are strategically facilitating the Sailer strategy. Many of us badwhites think this is wonderful, it’s certainly entertaining.

    Steve Bannon points out that many of the brighter pinkoes know this doubling down on identity politics is an error. But it seems likely that the identity politics push has gotten an unstoppable momentum of its own. Hopefully they will pick another POC as their next leader, here’s hoping for Kamala Harris.

    The Bannon interview was fun to watch. I wish they’d just played the full thing without editing. I guess that’s too much to expect.

    Read More
    • Agree: Thea
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview, said that Hillary is not very bright. I think he is right.
     
    I do love Bannon. That was probably the single best way to get a rise out of that self-important, self-aggrandizing female dog.
    , @Detective Club
    In lieu of applauding you for all the many excellent points you touch upon, let me commend you for the first one which you make : Hillary is not all that bright and never was. The only thing that she had in abundance was LUCK, along with a hell of a lot of sheer nerve.

    She was lucky not to wind up in an orange jumpsuit before the Dem. Convention in 2016. She had much to thank Lynch and Comey for that Tank Job, back then. A Republican would have wound up under the jail if he or she had committed a mere fraction of the crimes of Hillary Clinton. Let’s remember and not forget the bribes she took from Tyson Chicken in 1977-79, laundering the kickback money through the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

    On Nov. 8, 2016, Trump beat her by a combined vote of about 70,000 in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. A minor miracle of yuge proportions. Hillary’s LUCK had finally run out.
    , @Intelligent Dasein

    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview,
     
    I'm glad somebody brought up this interview, because I need to unburden myself of a most disquieting sensation. I feel like I'm in The Twilight Zone whenever I hear people on our side talk about how wonderful that interview was, as if one morning I woke up the same and everybody else was different.

    A word to the wise here---that interview was atrocious. Steve Bannon comes across as an unhinged zealot: Bloodshot eyes, interruptive speech, delusions of grandeur. He seems to think he's still playing some sort of vital role within the Trump administration, although paradoxically from "outside" it. The fact of the matter, as is becoming quite clear, is just the opposite. Bannon was apparently always a marginal figure in Trump's circle and with Trump's increasingly establishment drift, there is no longer any use for him. This must have come as a blow to Bannon's ego. He once thought (and had many others thinking) that he was the indispensable architect of the victorious Trump movement. That idea has turned out to be largely a myth created by himself.

    In compensation, Bannon has taken to running Breitbart as if it were his own personal vanity site. The features now consist of basically two kinds: 1) Articles about Steve Bannon; and 2) Articles about articles about Steve Bannon. This is is recurring theme with Breitbart and is reminiscent of the turbo-gonzo days of Milo Yiannopoulos.

    What's worse is the actual content of Steve Bannon's vision for the country. He styles himself as a defender of "radical unity," meaning that Americans of every race, religion, and sexual orientation will find common cause in his program of economic nationalism.

    It is impossible to overstate how stupid that is. Replace economic nationalism with "muh free market" and there is nothing to distinguish this from the cuckservativism of DR3 and "enterprise zones," except that Bannon's version lacks the gibs and graft necessary to actually make the spoils system work.

    Steve Bannon is an epic failure as a statesman. Whether its his grandiose but inaccurate historiographies ("Firing James Comey was the worst mistake in modern political history") or his cowardly hypocrisy ("We committed the original sin of the Trump administration; we embraced the establishment"), he is an unstable, self-promoting, and self-aggrandizing lunatic who has no place anywhere near the corridors of power.
    , @Cagey Beast
    Steve Bannon is right to say Hillary's not very bright about national politics but she's a genius at the level of social politics. At the matriarchal game she's unmatched. She stood by wayward Bill because she saw the long game, she got her plain daughter married off well and her Clinton Foundation is a comfortable little nest egg by even Saudi standards. She's even a bit of a living martyr at the hands of mean White men. That last bit is the cherry on top of the White lady masterpiece that is her life.
    , @Russ
    Loved your point about wanting to see the unexpurgated Bannon interview.

    The very first issue of Playboy I ever read was from 1990 or so. Its feature interview was of Donald Trump. Trump also had his own camera crew tape the interview. Wish Bannon had done likewise with 60 Minutes.
    , @Lurker

    Being whites themselves, they see being ostentatiously anti white as a status symbol.
     
    Indeed, how many times have we seen some dim wit SJW say online "But I'm white, how can I be anti-white?"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Tiny Duck says:

    Because whites have unearned privileges that are greater than their contributions

    Leonard Pitts and verysmartbrothas have written extensively on how white men continue to murder People of Color. Complaining about “anti white” stuff contributes to white supremacy. You guys are traitors tearforists and fake Americans. America is about freedom justice and the fight against racism

    You people need to get out. America does not want or need you

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color

    Also white wonen are increasingly bearing Children of Color. I cannot wait for just stick to be served

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Tearrorist is a new word for crybully. I approve!
    , @MEH 0910

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color
     
    Name some examples.
    , @Sgt. Joe Friday
    "You people need to get out. America does not want or need you"

    Fine with me. Give us a place to go, and we won't bother you again. The catch is that you have to agree not to bother us.
    , @Olorin
    OK OK OK then.

    I asked for a higher quality troll, I was told we can't afford it, being a sort of tincup-for-existence samizdat endeavor.

    So can we at LEAST take up a collection to send Dicky Nut to SKDKnickerbocker's summer camp for PR interns?

    Or maybe they're already sending their best. Hm.

    I demand more Edge from our resident troll!

    More wit! More...Andrew Anglin and less Andrew Cuomo! More Adrean Arlott and less Adrienne Arsineault! More Nick Bougas and less Nick Kristof!

    Dammit, I came of age on PJ O'Rourke in Ma Poon and manuscripts of The Boomer Bible (not published in book form till 1990 iirc)!

    http://johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/Culture/Extras/foreigners.html

    http://theboomerbible.com/

    I demand better Troll!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wp8t8b6Uo3o

    , @fish

    Tiny dat be excellent sentence structure. Leonard approves.

    - Leonard Pitts
     
    , @Logan
    "As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color."

    No doubt. However, this does not mean their stories are true.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. George says:

    The 2 black ladies that won the US Open had the WASPiest names ever, Sloane Stephens and Madison Keys. With 13 yro Cori Gauff almost winning the girls open. Compare with old timers Serena Jameka and Venus Ebony Starr Williams. Note: Keys passes the 1 drop test.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Madison Keys looks a little like Cheryl Crow.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. What would happen if it became unacceptable to openly hate white people?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/09/british-conductor-sacked-us-music-festival-joke-labelled-racist/

    British conductor sacked by US music festival after ‘innocent’ joke with his African-American friend was labelled racist

    Patrick Sawer
    9 SEPTEMBER 2017

    An acclaimed British conductor has been fired from a prestigious American music festival after a seemingly innocent joke he made to a black friend was labelled racist.

    Matthew Halls was removed as artistic director of the Oregon Bach Festival following an incident in which he imitated a southern American accent while talking to his longstanding friend, the African-American classical singer Reginald Mobley.

    It is understood a white woman who overheard the joke reported it to officials at the University of Oregon, which runs the festival, claiming it amounted to a racial slur.

    Shortly after Halls, who has worked with orchestras and opera houses across Europe and the US, was told by a university official his four year contract, which was to have run until 2020, was being terminated.

    Mobley, a countertenor who regularly performs in the UK, has now spoken out to defend his friend, saying there was nothing racist about the joke and describing the university’s apparent treatment of Halls as deeply unjust.

    “He has been victimised and I’m very upset about it,” he told The Sunday Telegraph. ”It was an innocent joke that has been entirely taken out of context.”

    The incident comes amid heightened sensitivity over race in the US, with renewed protest over police brutality, institutional racism and the re-emergence of white supremacists.

    It also coincides with the rise of what some have dubbed ‘the snowflake generation’ and the debate over whether the demand for ‘safe spaces’ on campus stifles debate and free speech or simply protects minorities from abuse and discrimination.

    But Mobley maintains that while racism should be challenged and ethnic groups made aware of each other’s sensitivities, his friend has been the victim of misunderstanding and overreaction.

    Halls and Mobley had been chatting at a reception held last month during this year’s Oregon Bach Festival, when the subject turned to a concert in London in which Mobley had performed.

    The singer, who was born and raised in the southern state of Florida, said the concert had an “antebellum” feel to it, of the sort associated with Gone With the Wind and other rose-tinted representations of the pre-Civil War south.

    In response Mobley says that Halls “apologised on behalf of England”, before putting on an exaggerated southern accent and joking: “Do you want some grits?”, in a reference to the ground corn dish popular in the south.

    “I’m from the deep south and Matthew often makes fun of the southern accent just as I often make fun of his British accent,” said Mobley. “Race was not an issue. He was imitating a southern accent, not putting on a black accent, and there was nothing racist or malicious about it.”

    But the singer suspects that a white woman who overheard their conversation and spoke to him moments later went on to report it to the university, alleging Halls had made a racist joke.

    An internal inquiry into the incident is understood to have been held as a result of the complaint.

    However, Mobley was not invited to give evidence and he says there is a deep irony in the fact the authorities appear to have assumed on his behalf that he would have objected to the joke.

    “I’m the subject of a falsified story, without having the chance to have my say,” he said. “My voice has been taken away in a conversation about race that involved me, and technically that’s racist.”

    Pressure on the festival organisers to reinstate Halls is growing, with from others musicians coming to his support.

    Meanwhile Mobley fears his friend’s career will suffer after being tarnished with the incendiary label of racism.

    “Matthew is obviously upset, and part of his anger would have to come from the fact he’s been accused of saying something so insensitive to a close friend,” said Mobley.

    The singer, who will perform in Purcell’s King Arthur with the Academy of Ancient Music at London’s Barbican next month, says that while he appreciates the efforts of some white people to confront racism, he warns it can lead to wrong headed assumptions.

    “A lot of our allies have become so eager to help the race and fix the scars they almost go too far,” said Mobley. “They think they are at the point where they understand racism more than those who have really encountered it in their lives and they make assumptions on our behalf about how we might feel, as if we don’t understand when something said to us or done to use is racist.

    “It’s well meaning, but the path to hell is paved with good intentions.

    “It also demeans and cheapens the very serious work done by civil rights activists and abolitionists to have the difficult nuances of racism and microaggressions taken seriously.”

    Responding to the claims a spokesman for Oregon Bach Festival, said: “The University considers many factors when deciding whether to continue a contract. Regarding Reggie Mobley, it doesn’t appear he was involved in the University’s decision. Having said that, it would be inappropriate for the University to disclose details about a personnel matter.

    “While I anticipate that more information will be available soon, I’m afraid that’s all I can say on the matter right now.”

    Educated white women are a big part of the problem. Fortunately non-gelded white men now have an option: yellow women.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The preferred nomenclature is...
    I love watching them eat their own.
    , @Alden
    I've never been in a confederate state but I really like grits. I don't like polenta at all, but I really like grits. Some of the cooking shows feature low country S Carolina shrimp and grits and grits and cheese soufflé type things.

    If the cooking show hostesses are black is the grits recipes racist? If the hostess is White is it racist?

    Is it racist for a White woman to like grits?

    You all will be happy to know that the Los Angeles Public Library system recently upheld the right of homeless crazies to sit at the computers in the 3 to 6 pm reserved for students section and look at porn and rub themselves.

    It was hoped that the kids vs porn viewers could be solved by by creating a separate homework section of computers and tables reserved for kids 3 to 6.

    But some of the lesbian SJW librarians felt that all library patrons should have public access to porn at every computer at all times.

    Free speech for me but not for thee.
    The two friends should have said the snitch bitch was lying. They should have charged her with saying the N word. Or turning down a disgusting sex approach by an N word.

    In 50 years of fending off attacks by liberals I've learned to fight fire with fire. Whites are in our present loser position is because we fight honestly.
    , @jim jones
    If I was eighteen again I would let my yellow fever run wild:

    https://imgur.com/a/vV9yk
    , @jim jones
    If I was eighteen again I would let my yellow fever run wild:

    https://imgur.com/a/vV9yk
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Deepy6 says:

    “Why exactly did Hillary insert “white” before “authoritarian” in that sentence? ”

    Is it not in part because Hillary thinks she is an honorary sassy black lady? Lord knows she’s put in the time. Con-fabbing and photo-opping with grievance committees. Boogie-ing down with the sistas in her Friday Night Pantsuit.

    Honorary Sassy Black Lady status, I guess, allows one to rail against “white authoritarians.”

    Some people are saying though, that Hillary has been white and authoritarian since Kindergarten, possibly earlier.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  43. bob sykes says:

    Ironically, the future of the Democrat Party is Tom Perez and Keith Ellison. Whites like Clinton, Pelosi and Schumer have no future in that party other than as field honkies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    Whites like Clinton, Pelosi and Schumer have no future in that party other than as field honkies.
     
    field honkies! That's great.
    , @AnotherDad

    Ironically, the future of the Democrat Party is Tom Perez and Keith Ellison. Whites like Clinton, Pelosi and Schumer have no future in that party other than as field honkies.
     
    Schumer? Seriously?

    The Democrat party is the Jews' party. The blacks are a vote bank, paid off with some welfare, some racial mau-mauing and AA table scraps and comfy sinecures for some talented--and even very untalented--tenth black elites.

    Yeah, down the road a few generations, the Jews may well lose control of this thing, but it's their show right now and that isn't about to change anytime soon. The coalition of the fringes is going to be run by the fringe that both has the money and is actually smart enough to make the coalition work.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. JohnnyD says:
    @Declane
    Just out of curiosity I googled the president of Mexico to see how white he looked. He looks as white as the average Italian-American in my neighborhood. It's funny how people talk about Mexicans and racism and all that without ever acknowledging that there are basically two races in Mexico - the ones with a drop of native blood and the ones with a bucket.

    But he is 5'7" so at least he shows his solidarity with his lessers by not reaching his full European height.

    Jorge Ramos plays the same game. He has blue eyes and relatively pale skin, but claims to be fighting white supremacy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Jake says:

    It was a given that ‘white’ would become the most important label for people who are ‘bad’, according to the Liberal narrative. ‘White’ is our ‘kulak.’ It was a given because of human nature.

    Liberals wanted to save and uplift the precious Numinous Negro. Liberals drew on the long history of WASP Elites hating the clear majority of whites they ruled as inferior, and even as deserving of something close to extermination (save that the WASP Elites needed somebody to do al the grunt work). So, our Liberals already ‘knew’ that the Irish, Scots, Welsh, and all Catholics and all non-Germanic whites, were flawed terribly, so much so they might not even be fit for anything.

    And that means when the Yankee Liberal WASP went gung-ho for the Numinous Negro, his utter contempt for non-WASP whites would also grow. That explained nicely how not he and his ‘good whites’ were responsible for racism. Nope, it was the white trash that the WASP Elites had always despised. And that is, and was, the vast majority of whites.

    And once that is mainstreamed, all things white will become bad, evil, putrid, at the very least boring and petty and dull. The movie Dodgeball is a fine example: White Goodman is the comic villian

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Did you see Sergio Dipp’s ESPN sideline report from Monday Night Football? I didn’t either because I no longer watch the NFL. But anyway, Sergio (who was born in Mexicali, Mexico and attended the University of Monterrey, where he studied communications) highlighted the black coach’s diversity and went into an embarrassing commentary.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQoB2flGBa4

    Read More
    • Replies: @grapesoda
    Because it's ESPN. They've been going full SJW for years now, in spite of tanking ratings and financial difficulties.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-28/espn-can-t-afford-to-go-on-like-this

    http://www.businessinsider.com/espns-layoffs-spell-trouble-for-live-sports-2017-3

    They also had a "groundbreaking" female-only announcing crew for the Monday night game, which all non-SJWs thought was terrible.

    ESPN is the Democratic Party of cable channels, ie too arrogant to try to correct their mistakes.
    , @Russ
    Don't know how Sergio was worse - in the brazen pandering to the SJWs, or in a performance that was worse than amateurish by any objective standards.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. bomag says:
    @jackson
    OT: have you heard about the recent LAPD cadet scandal (cadets stealing patrol cars and weapons)?

    Also, have you seen the demographics of the cadets lately? See here.

    Pretty uninspiring photo for future policeman; half look overweight.

    Not quite half appear female.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. Arclight says:

    The Democrats have positioned themselves as the not-white party, so any reference to whiteness is intended to remind people that person in question is not one of the virtuous, since to be a Democratic voter is to be on the side of the angels.

    The problem for the left is that they still need 40+ of white voters to win national elections, and the number of whites who are willing to put their needs and interests perpetually behind that of ‘people of color’ is limited. It is possible the Dems could see a rebound from the 37% of the white vote in 2016 if Trump becomes widely unpopular and they run a candidate who steers the party back towards economic issues rather than racial ones, but I am not sure the internal politics of the party will allow that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    That's the problem that the Dems are running into these days. Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslims are demanding to be front and center in the party leadership and to be the candidates. White men, Jews and white women are being pushed out.

    It was one thing having Bill Clinton or Schumer or Biden chiding whites and talking about white privilege. It's another to have Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible.

    Obama got away with it in part because of his personality (a well-spoken black who frankly didn't act like other blacks) and in part because he was the first PoC to get elected to high office. But even his racial animus came out over time, and it rubbed whites the wrong way.

    Whites won't have as much patience the next time around, nor will the PoC messenger likely be as smooth as Obama.

    It's a major problem for the Dems. Luckily for them, the GOP would rather perish than stand up for whites so the Dems will be just fine because it's hard to lose if you don't have an opponent.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    With all due respect, SS, I think you’re misinterpreting Hillary. Calling Trump a “white authoritarian” is simply accurate. Any number of African strongmen are “black authoritarians,” Mao was a “Chinese (or Han) authoritarian,” etc.

    I would suggest it is you, SS, who is projecting your own dislike of White nationalism. As a “citizenist” or whatever you were calling yourself awhile back, the “white” identifier offends you.

    Actually, Hillary is simply wrong; Trump is indeed a citizenist, not a White nationalist or White authoritarian. More’s the pity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. Dr. X says:
    @Peter Akuleyev
    Arguably in this case Hillary is trying to play up the story that Putin is some kind of "white nationalist". Erdogan is also ethnically/genetically very much a "white" guy but I can't imagine Hillary calling him a "white authoritarian."

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn't give a damn about "white identity", he is a statist.

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn’t give a damn about “white identity”, he is a statist.

    Yeah, but Putin is a “statist” in a lily-white country. Ergo, Russian nationalism is white Russian nationalism. You don’t see him importing Syrians, Turks, Pakistanis and Africans like Merkel and May, do you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lex
    You see him importing Uzbeks and Tajiks though.
    , @Dmitry134564
    The national minorities in the country have disproportionate power relative to the national majority. And the legal and illegal immigration from the CIS states - Caucasia and Central Asia, is equivalent to the situation of Latin American immigration in the United States.

    The configuration in the US is different - where the European majority has traditionally held power, wealth and prestige. Whereas in Russia, the majority nationality does not really have such a position, and national minorities are embedded in the ruling class (there's not need of 'affirmative action'). Compare the richest man in the US - Bill Gates (derived from the majority nationality of the country). While in Russia - Alisher Usmanov (who represents a nationality of some 1% within the country).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Hillary Clinton is a boozehound hypocrite who lives in the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York. Chappaqua is in Westchester County, New York. Chester is some form of the Roman word for camp. Hillary Clinton can be found at her imperial compound in the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York doing the thing Hillary Clinton loves to do: drinking booze and attacking her fellow White people. That is Hillary Clinton’s hobby.

    I hereby submit to you my belief that on the morning of September 11 of 2016 Hillary Clinton was both drunk as a skunk and hungover at the same time. Hillary Clinton’s inner rancidity was so great that her body rebelled against the excessive amounts of booze that she had imbibed the night before and then again starting in the morning.

    Exhibit (A) of my assertion that Hillary Clinton was both drunk as a skunk and hungover on September 11 2016:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
    Ah yes, the one year anniversary of that blessed event.
    , @Not Raul
    Stuff WASPs like: sending little Chip (or Trip) to Camp Chesterfield for the Summer.
    , @Kylie
    I never thought I would enjoy watching a video of Hillary--or any other reminder of her ill-conceived existence in this already troubled world---but my god, I love this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. CCZ says:

    “White” and “whiteness,” as pejorative words, seem to have origins, of course, in the early 1990s “academic” environment, especially in sociology, education studies, political philosophy, and psychology and to have very deep connections to the “anti-racist” “multi-cultural” political movement of that time and of today.

    For example:

    Drexel University “political philosopher” and “theorists” George Ciccariello-Maher points out that whiteness is not a race in a biological sense; it is a political category. “It just so happens that the political category of whiteness means nothing but ‘I am better than something else,’” he told me in a recent conversation on racism. “What whiteness means is that I’m not black and I’m not nonwhite, and therefore I deserve extra privileges.”

    Another perspective from a psychologist:

    In contemporary progressive circles, it is generally assumed that a group should be able to define itself, but whiteness has historically been defined by non-whites. For example, James Weldon Johnson, an African American poet and anthologist observed in 1912 that “The colored people of this country know and understand the white people better than the white people will ever know and understand themselves.” In the past 20 years, many white writers and scholars have embraced the study of whiteness, but people of color, particularly Black writers and academics continue to make significant (at times, even primary) contributions to this area of scholarship.

    There are several different components of whiteness. These include: 1) racial identity, 2) racial bias, and 3) racial privilege.

    “Multi-cultural education” professor and activist Robin DiAngelo is credited with creating the concept of “white fragility.”

    White people in North America live in a social environment that protects and insulates them from race-based stress. This insulated environment of racial protection builds white expectations for racial comfort while at the same time lowering the ability to tolerate racial stress, leading to what I refer to as White Fragility. White Fragility is a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves. These moves include the outward display of emotions such as anger, fear, and guilt, and behaviors such as argumentation, silence, and leaving the stress-inducing situation. These behaviors, in turn, function to reinstate white racial equilibrium.

    And “anti-racist” “multi-cultural” “multi-racialists,” such as those at the Center for the Study of White American Culture, have created “Decentering Whiteness” as an overt political strategy.

    Since its founding (in 1997), CSWAC has led in the exploration of white American culture, and its ramifications in the perpetuation and undoing of racism. We have seen the topics of whiteness, white privilege, and white American culture move from being taboo subjects to becoming open to public discussion.

    Whiteness in its contemporary form in United States society is culturally based. It controls institutions, which are extensions of white American culture, and which are also bounded, that is, governed, by the values and precepts of white American culture.

    Whiteness needs to be taken out of the center to join other racial/cultural groups on the margins. Simply attacking whiteness is not enough to accomplish this goal. Assaults on whiteness, depending on their nature, may have the effect of confirming and solidifying the central position of whiteness in American society. Thought must be given to how whiteness itself can be made more marginal.

    Previously, “A Symposium on Whiteness” (1995) focused on the emerging field of “whiteness studies.” “The explicit goal of this work, of course, is to move whiteness from the center.” Another article was titled “Decentering Whiteness: In Search of a Revolutionary Multiculturalism” (Peter McLaren, 1997). Decentering whiteness, as we understand it, also requires a concurrent process of multiracial centering.

    Read More
    • Agree: Desiderius
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. Chase says:
    @Anonymous
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is indeed a nationalist, but not a "white nationalist". He is a Russian nationalist. Russians are not all necessarily all that white-there are Asian and Middle Eastern admixtures in much of the Greater Russian population-but VV Putin does not care about that.

    If it's Russian, he's for it. If he thinks it's bad for Russia, he's against it. Very simple.

    He has a simple yardstick. Oh sure, he likes to wield power, and he is no ascetic or monk. He is very wealthy. But if he thinks it's bad for Russia and Russians no amount of money would sway him.

    I think Trump is a decent person in many ways, but Putin is a far more serious, a far more powerful man. I doubt America will ever really have a Putin.

    Damn shame, really.

    For the United States to produce a Putin, we will have to go through extreme turmoil, similar to Russia in the 90′s. I wouldn’t bet against it at some point, but not before much pain and death.

    Read More
    • Replies: @fish
    It's coming....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. Why exactly did Hillary insert “white” before “authoritarian” in that sentence?

    Because she believes that it scores points with PoC and some white women (and some Jews) and doesn’t cost her anything with whites. (I also think that she just doesn’t like strong white men.)

    She’s wrong, but that’s what she believes. In her defense, she likely would have been right up to a couple of years ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  55. @Anonymous
    This picture is larger: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBapsirUMAAzdhs.jpg:large

    Trust but verify, please provide a link to a piece or something that shows that’s legit.

    Some weird things about it:
    1/ that’s a monster graduating class
    2/ different uniforms, lapd graduations via google show all cadets in black
    3/ march’s graduating class had 30 ppl in it (18 hispanics tho, so….)

    http://www.lapdonline.org/home/news_view/61976

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. “the Nazis’ attitude toward disfavored underclasses”
    I don’t exactly see who antisemites’ “disfavored underclasses” were.
    Demonization doesn’t an underclass make.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kevin C.
    Indeed, "market dominant minority"≠"underclass"; if anything, it's much more unsafe to be the former (something we American whites should keep in mind, as we're about to become one).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @Arclight
    The Democrats have positioned themselves as the not-white party, so any reference to whiteness is intended to remind people that person in question is not one of the virtuous, since to be a Democratic voter is to be on the side of the angels.

    The problem for the left is that they still need 40+ of white voters to win national elections, and the number of whites who are willing to put their needs and interests perpetually behind that of 'people of color' is limited. It is possible the Dems could see a rebound from the 37% of the white vote in 2016 if Trump becomes widely unpopular and they run a candidate who steers the party back towards economic issues rather than racial ones, but I am not sure the internal politics of the party will allow that.

    That’s the problem that the Dems are running into these days. Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslims are demanding to be front and center in the party leadership and to be the candidates. White men, Jews and white women are being pushed out.

    It was one thing having Bill Clinton or Schumer or Biden chiding whites and talking about white privilege. It’s another to have Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible.

    Obama got away with it in part because of his personality (a well-spoken black who frankly didn’t act like other blacks) and in part because he was the first PoC to get elected to high office. But even his racial animus came out over time, and it rubbed whites the wrong way.

    Whites won’t have as much patience the next time around, nor will the PoC messenger likely be as smooth as Obama.

    It’s a major problem for the Dems. Luckily for them, the GOP would rather perish than stand up for whites so the Dems will be just fine because it’s hard to lose if you don’t have an opponent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Arclight
    Yeah - if the GOP was smart, they could continue to win the presidency just due to the erosion of white support for the Democrats alone. Even smarter would be to adopt the strategy Sailer has put forth of encouraging the perception of the Dems as a party primarily concerned with black Americans and force Hispanic voters to choose between that and the GOP as an alternative. You need a Rove or a Stone for that, and frankly the GOP doesn't really have a master political architect right now, but neither do the Dems.
    , @Beckow

    "Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible.....Obama got away with it in part because of his personality"

     

    That's a very good analysis. It explains the liberal media hysteria - both Dems and GOP establishment are cornered. So they lash out.

    Trump shook the system that was already wobbly. It is not possible to put it back in the box. There are too many ambitious politicians who would pick up the same themes. The best establishment option would be a neutered Trump who betrays his voters.

    The progressives are not very good with numbers. It will be another 20-30 years before they would have the PoC coalition that they seem to think already exists. They live mainly in immigrant-heavy enclaves and, as all simple people, they extrapolate. The liberal dominance depended on pacified and disinterested white voting, that is gone. It is unlikely that even 40% of whites would vote for identity-obsessed Dems. People know when they are not liked. And most pro-Trump part of America are white High School students - they will soon start voting.

    How are Dem candidates going to address the massive white majority of 70-75%? Preaching and accusations, name calling and hatred are not going to get many white votes. Once society is polarized, the largest group prevails.

    , @Anon
    Part of the problem with Republican candidates for office is that they have had the rule of coalition building beaten into their heads, namely, he who wins is the one who puts together the biggest coalition. It's a basic rule of warfare. They're not used to the idea that this country is fragmenting into masses that no longer assimilate and that-old fashioned coalition building no longer works on a national level. The main problem is that the Democrats, by demonizing whites, are splintering the electorate irreparably. Republicans hate the idea that they'll win elections by imitating George Wallace or Theodore Bilbo, and that what used to be the ideology of the old South is now white America writ large. You've got all these northern descendants of abolitionists and Unions soldiers who are writhing in agony at the thought of it.

    Someone made the point above is that self-hating whites like Hillary can only lead blacks and browns by being a self-hating white and buy promising to pass on a lot of free goodies, and that the minute white Democratics start losing elections anyway, blacks and browns will abandon them as candidates and create the rule that only people of color can represent them in office. That will finish off white Democrats completely. To POCs, having patronage and money being passed onto them in local politics by POC aldermen and mayors is far more important than supporting white candidates who lose elections and who fail to cough up the goodies.
    , @Kevin C.

    Whites won’t have as much patience the next time around
     
    So we "lose patience." So what? What can we do with that loss of patience except stew impotently in our anger and frustration? Elect more GOP Congress-critters who will, no matter what they say before the election, inevitably become a new batch of John McCains once in office? Because that's what the job is: to put up a show of fighting the left, then valiantly lose, thereby maintaining the illusion that Congress actually matters or has any real power anymore, rather than being one of the empty, last remnants of the Old Republic? Electing another Trump, who will be just as ineffective against the Deep State as him, because the Deep State are our true, unelected rulers who do not answer to any president, who are more powerful than any president? The "swamp" is undrainable, because it has far more power than any would-be "drainer."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @Cagey Beast
    Putin sees himself as an ethnic Russian running the multi-ethnic Russian Federation. That's the hand Russia has had to play for centuries. Putin and his supporters have wrapped their minds around this and it's of no import whether Stormfront types have managed to do the same. Putin is not an ethnic nationalist in the narrow, nasty 19th and 20th century form. He seems much more like an Austrian in the Austro-Hungarian Empire if that had managed to become a republic. That's probably a better model for Whites going forward anyway.

    Our wise and kind managerial classes have used mass exotic immigration to give us a bunch of quickly thrown together modern versions of the Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian Empires to live in whether we want it or not. Putin's Russianness may be a good template for American Whiteness.

    I agree. Putin (and citizens of the RF in general) subscribes to the melting pot theory of assimilating minorities that worked pretty well for the US until the 1960s, worked better than people think in the USSR and is still working well for China. Russia has the largest Muslim population, both in percentage and absolute numbers, of any country in Europe, but for the most part they don’t create problems. Russian culture is firmly established as the Leitkultur and minorities are free to celebrate elements of their own culture but it is understood that if push comes to shove the majority culture holds sway.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Whites Without College Degrees(WWCDs) thoroughly dislike mass immigration and multicultural mayhem. In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party was offering open borders mass immigration, amnesty for illegal alien infiltrators and more multicultural mayhem. White voters went with the candidate who promised to deport illegal alien infiltrators, dramatically reduce legal immigration and build a wall on the border between the United States and Mexico.

    President Trump had the brains and balls to win the votes of WWCDs and the ability as a billionaire to maintain many of the votes of upper middle class White voters. Now Hillary Clinton stalks around her imperial compound in the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York in an alcoholic frenzy induced by her bitterness at having been denied the presidency by Donald John Trump and his army of Whites Without College Degrees.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    his army of Whites Without College Degrees.
     
    Or, in other words, poorly educated losers.

    Is that supposed to be a badge of honour for the orange ogre? (rhetorically speaking :))

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. King Baeksu says: • Website

    Identity politics carves up society into oppressors and the oppressed.

    Guess who the oppressors are?

    If Dems and leftists continue with the anti-white rhetoric, it means they have not abandoned identity politics.

    I think they can’t help themselves, because they have no other play.

    For this reason, we can expect white-identity politics to accelerate as well.

    Dems are too dumb to understand this, but like I said, they just can’t help themselves.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  61. Jake says:
    @Cagey Beast
    White women consider White men their men and the global village to be their village.

    We all naturally think at the social scale of the village but this is doubly true for women. White women don't really care what the Arab, African or Chinese families in the global village do; they care about policing, shaming and (hopefully) uplifting their own children and men. Saudis and Chinese can publicly execute prisoners 'till the cows come home and White ladies will barely wrinkle their little noses but if "that man!" Putin takes his shirt off while fishing then their whole day is ruined. Putin is sort of the brother-in-law of Hillary's cousin in the global village and so it's her job to shame and police him. "I don't care what the Arabs do! In this family we're nice to gays!".

    This White lady world-view is fine and dandy at the level of the literal village but will be the death of us at the level of the mythical global village. Hillary Clinton, Madeline Albright and Samantha Power are the bossy Lady Bountifuls from the manor going around town shaming "their" men and uplifting the poor. Long story short, this is why we need to keep our ladies out of high level politics until they have the friend and enemy distinctions made perfectly clear to them.

    I think your assessment is correct. Whites are the near antithesis of the people directly addressed in Matthew 7: 3-5. Jesus talks about people whose first, and perhaps nearly only, instinct is to focus on even the smallest problem with other folks, and batter them, while ignoring their own much worse faults.

    Whites, meaning in this case Gentiles of European background, tend to be as you note: led by overly socially fastidious women, they will browbeat their own for little motes while ignoring not merely beams, but beams with gigantic spikes smeared in feces, that protrude from the eyes of non-whites and non-Christians.

    Those whites are as screwed up and WRONG as are the people on the other end of the pendulum that Jesus specifically condemns. In fact, whites being this way make those people much worse.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kevin C.

    I think your assessment is correct. Whites are the near antithesis of the people directly addressed in Matthew 7: 3-5.
     
    Except, how much of white people being that way is due to the influence of Matthew 7: 3-5 and related?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Jack D says:

    From the NYT book review:

    she [Hillary] blames racism, too, which she considers inseparable from economic anxiety, because her courting of immigrants and voters of color might have given the impression that she put their economic interests before those of disenfranchised whites.

    This is breathtaking. In one sentence, Senior admits that Clinton “courted” immigrants and colored voters (oops, voter of color) but when white people notice that she is not “courting” them too, that’s racis’!

    How could white voters EVER have gotten that impression from Hillary? (Surely not from reading the Party Line in the NY Times).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. TheBoom says:
    @Realist
    "When Did "White" Become an All-Purpose Insult?"

    When stupid whites allowed it.

    Yes, only whites will not only allow their skin color/ethnicity to be used as an insult, many will encourage it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    But how stupid do you have to be to do that?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Then there is interview on CBS with Jane Pauley, where we find Hillary and Jane Pauley blaming the election loss on those darn white people

    “[Trump] was quite successful in referencing a nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances, for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others because—” Clinton said.

    “What you’re saying is millions of white people,” Pauley said.

    “Millions of white people, yeah,” Clinton replied. “Millions of white people.”

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-what-happened-sunday-morning-jane-pauley/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    I feel excluded by her remark!
    , @Pericles

    “[Trump] was quite successful in referencing a nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances, for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others because—” Clinton said.

     

    Those damn deplorables. (Downs another slug.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Hillary “Baby Boomer Boozehound” Clinton mixes herself up some gin and tonics while stewing in her own juices about having lost the presidency to Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton has two hobbies: Imbibing copious amounts of booze and insulting regular White Americans. Somebody on the campaign should have advised Hillary that constantly attacking White people is a bad strategy.

    Hillary Clinton is a very bitter woman:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Trump] was quite successful in referencing a nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances, for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others because—” Clinton said.

    So whites were not upset that income for white men has not budged in 40 years, that instead of good union jobs at high wages in factories and steel mills they now get to work part time for minimum wage at Wal-Mart, that their downtowns look like they have been thru a war, that their youth is dying from opioid overdose. They are just "upset" about "gains made by others" - that's all. (Whites are also not supposed to notice or be upset that the "gains made by others" have been made at their expense by government putting its thumb on the scale.)

    Not only does this woman not deserve to be POTUS, she belong in jail for treason. Putin is an amoral monster in most respects but at least he loves his own people. Hillary is an amoral monster who HATES her own race down to the core of her being. With that hatred as her guiding principle, her every move as POTUS would have lead us to further disintegration. Hillary makes much of the fact that she was much better prepared to be President, with detailed position papers, etc. on every aspect of governance. But all this preparation is for naught if it is all shaped by animus toward your own people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. The whole Clinton quote makes no sense. It is not just the “whiteness” part and not just the fact that Kadyrov doesn’t exactly come across as a repressed minority. Trump had already figured out a way to make billions before entering politics – likely even a couple more than Putin has. Trump has enriched rather than weakened the media. Trump has articulated rather than suppressed dissent.
    Today we are going to witness another attempt at creating a “reality distortion field”. Clinton’s effort will likely be an order of magnitude less successful than that commercial endeavor over in Cupertino.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  67. Tiny Duck says:
    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    blacks do worse than that every day in the U.S. (and where was Tiny Dick?)

    blacks also rape ~75 white women per day and the reverse almost never happens
    , @fish

    The word for the day is"bigamy".

    Let's use that in a sentence.

    "I gave my wife $20.....dat was bigamy."

    - Leonard Pitts
     
    , @Elli
    Where do you get the idea that Brazilian gold miners are white?

    Or do you just blame white people's endless appetite for gold?

    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/807903620625112582/

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. songbird says:
    @Lot
    Before "white" was an insult, it was "white bread."

    I recall Welcome Back, Kotter’s POC characters using that term a lot. Informally, it seemed to be a bigger hit among Jewish people. Myself, it just made me think: I’m supposed to enjoy a sitcom that insults me? (which is different from one making a funny ethnic joke.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. “But is it any surprise then that not enough white people voted for Hillary to make her President?”

    She even lost the white sisterhood, but she seems incapable of any self reflection as to what mistakes may have contributed to her loss.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  70. @NickG
    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview, said that Hillary is not very bright. I think he is right.

    Combine this with her being in a filter bubble, it seems likely that she, and hopefully the Dems too, cannot resist doubling down on identity politics, with whites as the bogey man. Being whites themselves, they see being ostentatiously anti white as a status symbol. They are running some weird combination of primate dominance display, combined with a bird of paradise like virtue signal. No doubt Jordan Peterson could wax lyrical on what's going on.

    They seem not to understand cause and effect....of karma. Identity politics begets identity politics and whites are, ever so gently for now, starting to play. The Dems themselves have and still are strategically facilitating the Sailer strategy. Many of us badwhites think this is wonderful, it's certainly entertaining.

    Steve Bannon points out that many of the brighter pinkoes know this doubling down on identity politics is an error. But it seems likely that the identity politics push has gotten an unstoppable momentum of its own. Hopefully they will pick another POC as their next leader, here's hoping for Kamala Harris.

    The Bannon interview was fun to watch. I wish they'd just played the full thing without editing. I guess that's too much to expect.

    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview, said that Hillary is not very bright. I think he is right.

    I do love Bannon. That was probably the single best way to get a rise out of that self-important, self-aggrandizing female dog.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @Tiny Duck
    Because whites have unearned privileges that are greater than their contributions

    Leonard Pitts and verysmartbrothas have written extensively on how white men continue to murder People of Color. Complaining about "anti white" stuff contributes to white supremacy. You guys are traitors tearforists and fake Americans. America is about freedom justice and the fight against racism

    You people need to get out. America does not want or need you

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color

    Also white wonen are increasingly bearing Children of Color. I cannot wait for just stick to be served

    Tearrorist is a new word for crybully. I approve!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. ChrisZ says:

    To me, a milestone in the public shaming of whites came at the conclusion of Pres. Obama’s first inaugural. The benediction by Rev. Joseph Lowery ended on the following note:

    “Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get back, when brown can stick around — (laughter) — when yellow will be mellow — (laughter) — when the red man can get ahead, man — (laughter) — and when white will embrace what is right.
    “Let all those who do justice and love mercy say amen.”
    AUDIENCE: “Amen!”
    REV. LOWERY: “Say amen –”
    AUDIENCE: “Amen!”
    REV. LOWERY: “— and amen.”
    AUDIENCE: “Amen!” (Cheers, applause.)

    Everyone on the coalition of fringes recognized this as a cock-a-doodle-doo of victory over “the Man.” (On the broadcast I watched [not the one linked below] you could hear and see former VP Gore whooping it up the most, in a telling little moment of schadenfreude.) Rev. Lowery (no relation to Rich, I believe) himself became a minor celebrity (for the quarter-hour following; having served his function he was promptly forgotten).

    In the room where I watched the ceremony, most everyone oohed and aahed at the funny-old-black-reverend-who-tells-it-like-it-is (TM). I was the only one to call it disgraceful to strike a note of racial animus in a presidential inaugural.

    What really irked me was that anyone would waste the occasion by regurgitating such stale, sing-song doggerel. But the great and good loved it; and public prayer has been amateur hour ever since.

    Here’s a transcript and video link:
    http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/stevenwaldman/2009/01/rev-lowery-inauguration-benedi.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marat Said
    "stale, sing-song doggerel", good one.

    It's how I imagine Cornel West's recent chant as the 2017 Convocation speaker at Harvard Divinity School, which he called: Spiritual Blackout, Imperial Meltdown, Prophetic Fightback.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. jim jones says:
    @Stephen Paul Foster
    It is interesting to speculate on just when this -- "the increasingly gratuitous usage among white elites of the word 'white' as an insult" -- happened.

    My theory is that Obama's eight year reign of terror was the imprimatur the good whites needed to turn "white" into a moral stigma. Completely aligned with Obama (the black super-hero) was the massive block of opinion-attitude entities -- MSM, entertainment industry, academia. Obama's presidency -- so the story-line goes -- was not only wonderful, but inevitable. And so, it is now time for whites to quit complaining, except their inferior status and step aside. The insults are embedded in the new progressive order, part of the pay back. Hillary tried to be Obama II but for obvious reasons couldn't pull it off. The Dems now are shopping around to find a more suitable choice for 2020. Recently I saw a piece by Douglas Schoen, former Clinton pollster, in the Hill, I think, "arguing" that Michelle Obama is the best Democrat to beat Trump. Makes sense, sort of.

    See: https://www.amren.com/news/2017/03/exterminationist-left-happy-trails-zimbabwe/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Detective Club
    What are they smoking?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @Cwhatfuture
    Then there is interview on CBS with Jane Pauley, where we find Hillary and Jane Pauley blaming the election loss on those darn white people

    "[Trump] was quite successful in referencing a nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances, for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others because—" Clinton said.

    "What you're saying is millions of white people," Pauley said.

    "Millions of white people, yeah," Clinton replied. "Millions of white people."

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-what-happened-sunday-morning-jane-pauley/

    I feel excluded by her remark!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. I’ll say mid 1990′s.

    I distinctly recall watching David Letterman one night. A show staffer, a clean-cut, well-dressed, well-coiffed red-headed male who did cameos in some of the comedy bits with Letterman was mugging up close to a camera “on the street”.

    The show’s director made the red-headed clean-cut adult white male appear mildly clownish.

    Dave’s line at that moment, “you look like the legal definition of a white guy”.

    Crowd laughs . . . I distinctly recall feeling a “WTH” feeling at that moment, I knew that was all just wrong but did not know why.

    In hindsight, I can recall such things have steadily worsened ever since.

    “White” was carefully re-made into the new “N” word. And made a socially accepted epithet. The entertainment industry has been very industrious at that.

    A step further – if a show, let’s say the movie “Dunkirk”, is filled with White people, we have been conditioned to think something is wrong – simply by the presence of “too many” White people.

    And the concept of “too many White people” is a moving goalpost. Moving to run us over.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  76. @NickG
    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview, said that Hillary is not very bright. I think he is right.

    Combine this with her being in a filter bubble, it seems likely that she, and hopefully the Dems too, cannot resist doubling down on identity politics, with whites as the bogey man. Being whites themselves, they see being ostentatiously anti white as a status symbol. They are running some weird combination of primate dominance display, combined with a bird of paradise like virtue signal. No doubt Jordan Peterson could wax lyrical on what's going on.

    They seem not to understand cause and effect....of karma. Identity politics begets identity politics and whites are, ever so gently for now, starting to play. The Dems themselves have and still are strategically facilitating the Sailer strategy. Many of us badwhites think this is wonderful, it's certainly entertaining.

    Steve Bannon points out that many of the brighter pinkoes know this doubling down on identity politics is an error. But it seems likely that the identity politics push has gotten an unstoppable momentum of its own. Hopefully they will pick another POC as their next leader, here's hoping for Kamala Harris.

    The Bannon interview was fun to watch. I wish they'd just played the full thing without editing. I guess that's too much to expect.

    In lieu of applauding you for all the many excellent points you touch upon, let me commend you for the first one which you make : Hillary is not all that bright and never was. The only thing that she had in abundance was LUCK, along with a hell of a lot of sheer nerve.

    She was lucky not to wind up in an orange jumpsuit before the Dem. Convention in 2016. She had much to thank Lynch and Comey for that Tank Job, back then. A Republican would have wound up under the jail if he or she had committed a mere fraction of the crimes of Hillary Clinton. Let’s remember and not forget the bribes she took from Tyson Chicken in 1977-79, laundering the kickback money through the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

    On Nov. 8, 2016, Trump beat her by a combined vote of about 70,000 in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. A minor miracle of yuge proportions. Hillary’s LUCK had finally run out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Trump does not seem to have responded to Clinton’s many insults in the book.

    That’s mighty white of him.

    Read More
    • LOL: Sarah Toga
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  78. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    White Bitch.

    At any rate, she didn’t create the Zeitgeist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  79. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Reason #4,332 why we’re truly blessed to have dodged the bullet by not having this drunken creature as our president. The resentment really oozes through as she lowers her mask. What a nightmare we’d be living through right now. What’s with this dogged Putin-hate? He’s the leader of a country and does what he’s supposed to do on their behalf. He didn’t kowtow to the US so he’s bad? It seems personal and visceral. Perhaps him being seen shirtless astride a horse triggered some weird psycho-sexual reaction in her. Ever seen a photo of her husband Bill shirtless? He looked like a marshmallow with some legs and arms sticking out, before the current AIDS looking days. This aging dyke really hates white men with a passion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  80. Langley says:
    @JackOH
    Let me try for a "big picture-y" rationale for White as a negative intensifier. Reductio ad Hitlerum.

    The Greatest Generation returns from WWII congratulating itself for having whooped Hitler's arse. Unable to disinterestedly view Hitler's early career as a fairly benign and successful architect of national revival and national solidarity, that Greatest Generation itself becomes vulnerable to charges of racial animus and imperial aggrandizement lodged by America's Left who see their main chance in the Greatest Generation's complacency, even smugness. Bewildered, the Greatest Generation, ordinary men and women with traditional ties to church and family and country, are ideologically equated with the Hitler they defeated. Hitler, of course, was cheerleader for a political party with a virulent and explicit racialist wing.

    America's Left saw its opportunity in eliding the difference between most Whites' cordial but wary relations between Blacks, and the Nazis' attitude toward disfavored underclasses.

    So White equals negative intensifier . . . because Hitler and Nazis. The chances of some national reevaluation of Hitler and the Nazis, which is what might be needed to end the plague of nasty and unending Leftishness, is probably zip point squat because of its massive unpalatability.

    Morning coffee's kicking in. Thanks for allowing this comment.

    Why did/does the US vilify Hitler and Himler but not Hirohito and Tojo?
    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it’s used against Japan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it’s used against Japan.

    Einstein was a "peace-loving" man. Seriously. Some years ago, two kids in my son's 3rd grade class did biography book reports on Einstein, anad both kids mentioned that Einstein was "peace-loving." I thought it was very odd.

    , @AndrewR
    Because the Japanese were neither subject to nor rebellious against Ashkenazi Supremacy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Before “white” was an insult, it was “white bread.”
     
    The trope lives on! In name-brand form here:

    Slated to play Che Guevara is Constantine Maroulis, a former “American Idol’’ contestant who earned a Tony Award nomination for his performance on Broadway in “Rock of Ages.’’ Maroulis is Greek-American. In a recent Globe interview, Maroulis said he believes concerns about him playing Che are not justified. Saying “I’m not exactly a loaf of Wonder Bread,’’ he cited the discrimination encountered by his grandparents when they immigrated to the United States.
     

    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.

    What the Hell is wrong with these people? This stuff is empirical and uncontroversial; they are literally defying reality.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Lol. If leftists had any respect for reality, they wouldn't be leftists. But for reasons probably more complex than anyone may be aware of, Americans of all ethnicities tend to lump all Latinos together racially. And many white Latinos try to exploit this for their own benefit. See: Rubio, Little Marco
    , @AndrewR
    Having said all that, it is kinda surprising that in a city as huge and cosmopolitan as Boston that the casting directors were unable to find an Argentinian of similar ethnic background to play Che, or at least an American with Che's approximate admixture.
    , @Jack D
    Here is a picture of young Che (left) with his family - they look pretty "white bread" to me:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Chefamily.jpg

    In accordance with Spanish naming customs (father's name then mother's) his father was named
    Ernesto Guevara y Lynch - in other words Che was a "Lynch" thru his paternal grandmother. It's unclear (at least to me) how long the Lynches resided in Argentina - some sources trace him to Patrick (Patricio) Lynch who arrived in Argentina in the 18th century while others point to more recent ancestry.

    By appearance the Guevaras didn't have a lot of Irish in them and I am guessing were mostly Spanish (but very little if any Amerindian). The Argentine lower classes all identify as "Spanish" but in fact, especially once you get outside of Buenos Aires, have a great deal of Indian blood (which they pretend not to notice), but the upper classes (like Che) tend to be mostly or all European (albeit Southern European ).
    , @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.
     
    I think we should get in the habit of calling him "Che Lynch," which is of course his true surname.
    , @songbird
    When a POC entertainer says something anti-white that equals self-promotion.

    Classic example Whoopi Goldberg. She heard about Star Trek TNG from Levar Burton (who had been in Roots and now was chief engineer). She told him to ask about her getting a role. She was ignored, until she made the call and was given the courtesy of a meeting. She asked if there was only one black guy who was a lieutenant in Roddenberry's hopeful future. She got a role, which they created for her, after her complaint. Not just any role but an all-wise, quasi-immortal black lady with mysterious powers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Arclight says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    That's the problem that the Dems are running into these days. Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslims are demanding to be front and center in the party leadership and to be the candidates. White men, Jews and white women are being pushed out.

    It was one thing having Bill Clinton or Schumer or Biden chiding whites and talking about white privilege. It's another to have Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible.

    Obama got away with it in part because of his personality (a well-spoken black who frankly didn't act like other blacks) and in part because he was the first PoC to get elected to high office. But even his racial animus came out over time, and it rubbed whites the wrong way.

    Whites won't have as much patience the next time around, nor will the PoC messenger likely be as smooth as Obama.

    It's a major problem for the Dems. Luckily for them, the GOP would rather perish than stand up for whites so the Dems will be just fine because it's hard to lose if you don't have an opponent.

    Yeah – if the GOP was smart, they could continue to win the presidency just due to the erosion of white support for the Democrats alone. Even smarter would be to adopt the strategy Sailer has put forth of encouraging the perception of the Dems as a party primarily concerned with black Americans and force Hispanic voters to choose between that and the GOP as an alternative. You need a Rove or a Stone for that, and frankly the GOP doesn’t really have a master political architect right now, but neither do the Dems.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rod1963
    The GOP just wants Trump gone, period.

    The fact is the GOP has never liked the white blue collar or middle-class people at all. They just happened to throw them a bone once in a while but that's it. It's a country club for upper class professionals and grifters.

    Take a look at their economic policies since GHW Bush - screw the little guy and cater to the wealthy, support globalization and off-shoring of industry and keep the borders open.

    As a party they didn't like outsiders like Reagan or Trump anymore than the DNC liked Carter(they hated him as much as the GOP hates Trump). It's a culture thing. Reagan and Trump were mainstream Americans in terms of thinking and values. They never fit in the hallowed halls of the Hamptons or Greenwich.

    And they are quite content on committing political suicide to get rid of Trump because they don't care if they end up a permanent rump party as long as they get payolla.

    In short don't view them as Americans because they are not, they are merely self-serving swindlers.
    , @Harry Baldwin
    You need a Rove for what? For making the GOP the white party? Rove was an open borders, anti-Trump fanatic.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @Anonymous

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/09/british-conductor-sacked-us-music-festival-joke-labelled-racist/

    British conductor sacked by US music festival after 'innocent' joke with his African-American friend was labelled racist

    Patrick Sawer
    9 SEPTEMBER 2017

    An acclaimed British conductor has been fired from a prestigious American music festival after a seemingly innocent joke he made to a black friend was labelled racist.

    Matthew Halls was removed as artistic director of the Oregon Bach Festival following an incident in which he imitated a southern American accent while talking to his longstanding friend, the African-American classical singer Reginald Mobley.

    It is understood a white woman who overheard the joke reported it to officials at the University of Oregon, which runs the festival, claiming it amounted to a racial slur.

    Shortly after Halls, who has worked with orchestras and opera houses across Europe and the US, was told by a university official his four year contract, which was to have run until 2020, was being terminated.

    Mobley, a countertenor who regularly performs in the UK, has now spoken out to defend his friend, saying there was nothing racist about the joke and describing the university’s apparent treatment of Halls as deeply unjust.

    “He has been victimised and I’m very upset about it,” he told The Sunday Telegraph. ”It was an innocent joke that has been entirely taken out of context.”

    The incident comes amid heightened sensitivity over race in the US, with renewed protest over police brutality, institutional racism and the re-emergence of white supremacists.

    It also coincides with the rise of what some have dubbed ‘the snowflake generation’ and the debate over whether the demand for ‘safe spaces’ on campus stifles debate and free speech or simply protects minorities from abuse and discrimination.

    But Mobley maintains that while racism should be challenged and ethnic groups made aware of each other’s sensitivities, his friend has been the victim of misunderstanding and overreaction.

    Halls and Mobley had been chatting at a reception held last month during this year’s Oregon Bach Festival, when the subject turned to a concert in London in which Mobley had performed.

    The singer, who was born and raised in the southern state of Florida, said the concert had an “antebellum” feel to it, of the sort associated with Gone With the Wind and other rose-tinted representations of the pre-Civil War south.

    In response Mobley says that Halls “apologised on behalf of England”, before putting on an exaggerated southern accent and joking: “Do you want some grits?”, in a reference to the ground corn dish popular in the south.

    “I’m from the deep south and Matthew often makes fun of the southern accent just as I often make fun of his British accent,” said Mobley. “Race was not an issue. He was imitating a southern accent, not putting on a black accent, and there was nothing racist or malicious about it.”

    But the singer suspects that a white woman who overheard their conversation and spoke to him moments later went on to report it to the university, alleging Halls had made a racist joke.

    An internal inquiry into the incident is understood to have been held as a result of the complaint.

    However, Mobley was not invited to give evidence and he says there is a deep irony in the fact the authorities appear to have assumed on his behalf that he would have objected to the joke.

    “I’m the subject of a falsified story, without having the chance to have my say,” he said. “My voice has been taken away in a conversation about race that involved me, and technically that’s racist.”

    Pressure on the festival organisers to reinstate Halls is growing, with from others musicians coming to his support.

    Meanwhile Mobley fears his friend’s career will suffer after being tarnished with the incendiary label of racism.

    “Matthew is obviously upset, and part of his anger would have to come from the fact he’s been accused of saying something so insensitive to a close friend,” said Mobley.

    The singer, who will perform in Purcell's King Arthur with the Academy of Ancient Music at London’s Barbican next month, says that while he appreciates the efforts of some white people to confront racism, he warns it can lead to wrong headed assumptions.

    “A lot of our allies have become so eager to help the race and fix the scars they almost go too far,” said Mobley. “They think they are at the point where they understand racism more than those who have really encountered it in their lives and they make assumptions on our behalf about how we might feel, as if we don’t understand when something said to us or done to use is racist.

    “It’s well meaning, but the path to hell is paved with good intentions.

    “It also demeans and cheapens the very serious work done by civil rights activists and abolitionists to have the difficult nuances of racism and microaggressions taken seriously.”

    Responding to the claims a spokesman for Oregon Bach Festival, said: “The University considers many factors when deciding whether to continue a contract. Regarding Reggie Mobley, it doesn’t appear he was involved in the University’s decision. Having said that, it would be inappropriate for the University to disclose details about a personnel matter.

    “While I anticipate that more information will be available soon, I’m afraid that’s all I can say on the matter right now.”

     

    Educated white women are a big part of the problem. Fortunately non-gelded white men now have an option: yellow women.

    I love watching them eat their own.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. @JW Bell
    Those are photos of a high school youth program, http://www.lapdcadets.com

    And here are the cadets: slideshow here, sample here.

    Wow, LA is brown.

    Read More
    • Replies: @LondonBob
    Can't see a white cadet, bodes well for the future of law enforcement in California.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Jack D says:
    @Charles Pewitt
    Hillary "Baby Boomer Boozehound" Clinton mixes herself up some gin and tonics while stewing in her own juices about having lost the presidency to Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton has two hobbies: Imbibing copious amounts of booze and insulting regular White Americans. Somebody on the campaign should have advised Hillary that constantly attacking White people is a bad strategy.

    Hillary Clinton is a very bitter woman:

    https://twitter.com/BobNotBob/status/906178247414644737

    Trump] was quite successful in referencing a nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances, for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others because—” Clinton said.

    So whites were not upset that income for white men has not budged in 40 years, that instead of good union jobs at high wages in factories and steel mills they now get to work part time for minimum wage at Wal-Mart, that their downtowns look like they have been thru a war, that their youth is dying from opioid overdose. They are just “upset” about “gains made by others” – that’s all. (Whites are also not supposed to notice or be upset that the “gains made by others” have been made at their expense by government putting its thumb on the scale.)

    Not only does this woman not deserve to be POTUS, she belong in jail for treason. Putin is an amoral monster in most respects but at least he loves his own people. Hillary is an amoral monster who HATES her own race down to the core of her being. With that hatred as her guiding principle, her every move as POTUS would have lead us to further disintegration. Hillary makes much of the fact that she was much better prepared to be President, with detailed position papers, etc. on every aspect of governance. But all this preparation is for naught if it is all shaped by animus toward your own people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. @bob sykes
    Ironically, the future of the Democrat Party is Tom Perez and Keith Ellison. Whites like Clinton, Pelosi and Schumer have no future in that party other than as field honkies.

    Whites like Clinton, Pelosi and Schumer have no future in that party other than as field honkies.

    field honkies! That’s great.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johann Ricke

    field honkies! That’s great.
     
    Wouldn't house crackas be more appropriate?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Realist says:
    @TheBoom
    Yes, only whites will not only allow their skin color/ethnicity to be used as an insult, many will encourage it.

    But how stupid do you have to be to do that?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Langley
    Why did/does the US vilify Hitler and Himler but not Hirohito and Tojo?
    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it's used against Japan.

    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it’s used against Japan.

    Einstein was a “peace-loving” man. Seriously. Some years ago, two kids in my son’s 3rd grade class did biography book reports on Einstein, anad both kids mentioned that Einstein was “peace-loving.” I thought it was very odd.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    "Whatever reason" might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.
    , @Jack D
    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    "Whatever reason" might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.
    , @Jack D
    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    "Whatever reason" might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. AndrewR says:
    @Declane
    Just out of curiosity I googled the president of Mexico to see how white he looked. He looks as white as the average Italian-American in my neighborhood. It's funny how people talk about Mexicans and racism and all that without ever acknowledging that there are basically two races in Mexico - the ones with a drop of native blood and the ones with a bucket.

    But he is 5'7" so at least he shows his solidarity with his lessers by not reaching his full European height.

    The Mexican elites, who tend to be much whiter than the average Mexican, promote the colonization of the US and interference in its policies. They get to export their surplus population, reduce political pressure on the Mexican government to fix problems in Mexico, get money injected into the economy through remittances and get increased political control of their northern colony.

    It’s hard to blame Mexican elites for this. It’s a win/win/win for them. And obviously certain Americans benefit from having tens of millions of (relatively) docile, hard-working Mexicans who don’t demand high wages. But there are tens of millions of Americams who don’t benefit in any way from Mexican colonization yet still support it wholeheartedly. SUPPORT OUR DREAMERS WOOOOOOOO!!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Oh man, Hillary’s accusations reads like a laundry list of the reasons why she (and the Dems in general) lost—and will continue to lose, at this pace.

    We’ve got:

    Identity politics – check!
    Russian narrative – check!
    Secret neo-Nazi/white supremacist – check!

    I think the only thing she’s missing there is misogyny, but it was impressive enough to pack all that in just a few words. It’s almost like they want Trump to win again in 2020.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  91. AndrewR says:
    @Autochthon
    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.

    What the Hell is wrong with these people? This stuff is empirical and uncontroversial; they are literally defying reality.

    Lol. If leftists had any respect for reality, they wouldn’t be leftists. But for reasons probably more complex than anyone may be aware of, Americans of all ethnicities tend to lump all Latinos together racially. And many white Latinos try to exploit this for their own benefit. See: Rubio, Little Marco

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    "for reasons probably more complex..."

    No, they are garden-variety who/whom reasons.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @George
    The 2 black ladies that won the US Open had the WASPiest names ever, Sloane Stephens and Madison Keys. With 13 yro Cori Gauff almost winning the girls open. Compare with old timers Serena Jameka and Venus Ebony Starr Williams. Note: Keys passes the 1 drop test.

    Madison Keys looks a little like Cheryl Crow.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Autochthon
    I'm sure it was an innocent typographical error, but I must remark that "Cheryl Crow" impresses me as a pornographic actress' attempt to capitalise on Sheryl Crow's popularity.

    What ever happened to Brittnee Spears after her AVN-award-winning scene with Kevin Feederlines and Mandee Moar?

    (Okay, okay; I won't quit my day-job....)
    , @Detective Club
    ...but with a hideous overbite and a lantern chin.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. Maj. Kong says:
    @BB753
    No ideas except maybe turn it into a video-game. California can't be fixed anymore.

    Buckets of Chinese (and soon Indian) money say otherwise.

    Read More
    • Replies: @BB753
    When was the last time a construction bubble went wrong?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Thea says:
    @Peter Akuleyev
    Arguably in this case Hillary is trying to play up the story that Putin is some kind of "white nationalist". Erdogan is also ethnically/genetically very much a "white" guy but I can't imagine Hillary calling him a "white authoritarian."

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn't give a damn about "white identity", he is a statist.

    He is a Russian nationalist who has invited ethnic Russians back home to get free land in the Far East if they raise a Russian family there. He is a good role model for the type of leader we need but don’t have. We don’t want him as our leader, we want an definitively American version of Putin. Or Netenyahu.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    He has also invited the Chinese to invest there, along with associated immigration, and suppressed the local complaints - since the native white Siberians haven't been very productive with the same land.

    The Alt-Right heads would explode.

    As said, he does what he thinks is right for Russia. Whatever it takes. Ultimately, life for the Russian equivalent of the Appalachians isn't that much better either; he has the same contempt for "unproductive" people as any other elite. One could even argue that isn't a choice when you have to keep competing against the world.

    On the upside, alcohol consumption has been dropping.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. AndrewR says:
    @Autochthon
    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.

    What the Hell is wrong with these people? This stuff is empirical and uncontroversial; they are literally defying reality.

    Having said all that, it is kinda surprising that in a city as huge and cosmopolitan as Boston that the casting directors were unable to find an Argentinian of similar ethnic background to play Che, or at least an American with Che’s approximate admixture.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Che's father thought his Irish ancestry was predominant in his son's personality.
    , @Jack D
    Just be glad that they got a more or less white guy. The modern casting trend would be to get some Nigerian to play Che.
    , @Hibernian
    Shouldn't be hard to find a Lynch in boston.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. I think Trump forced their hand. They being the self hating whites and the Jews. They should have saved their open warfare until the whites were actually a minority. Hillary’s deplorables remark was a bridge too far for the Democrats. Pulling whites into identity politics was premature.

    The political struggle that matters is the Nationalists vs the Globalists/Imperialists. The later want to paint the former as Hitler. It’s a school yard taunt. Answer it in kind. Simply say no. You are Hitler.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  97. Pericles says:
    @Cwhatfuture
    Then there is interview on CBS with Jane Pauley, where we find Hillary and Jane Pauley blaming the election loss on those darn white people

    "[Trump] was quite successful in referencing a nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances, for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others because—" Clinton said.

    "What you're saying is millions of white people," Pauley said.

    "Millions of white people, yeah," Clinton replied. "Millions of white people."

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-what-happened-sunday-morning-jane-pauley/

    “[Trump] was quite successful in referencing a nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances, for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others because—” Clinton said.

    Those damn deplorables. (Downs another slug.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. AndrewR says:
    @Langley
    Why did/does the US vilify Hitler and Himler but not Hirohito and Tojo?
    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it's used against Japan.

    Because the Japanese were neither subject to nor rebellious against Ashkenazi Supremacy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    Or maybe because Germany surrendered and Japan didn't?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. @AndrewR
    Having said all that, it is kinda surprising that in a city as huge and cosmopolitan as Boston that the casting directors were unable to find an Argentinian of similar ethnic background to play Che, or at least an American with Che's approximate admixture.

    Che’s father thought his Irish ancestry was predominant in his son’s personality.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Che's Irish (Lynch) ancestor may have been quite remote - there don't seem to be any good family trees around but it's possible that he was only a small % of Irish. Maybe his personality was "Irish" (rebellious) but his appearance was not. Even in his younger clean cut days he looks European but not distinctly Irish:

    http://www.hey-che.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/10620688_10203495607933806_4705905265320858186_n-227x222.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Broski says:
    @eah
    OT

    Inside The Opioid Crisis: What The Mainstream Media Won't Let You See

    http://stockboardasset.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Screen-Shot-2017-09-11-at-9.23.02-AM-1.png

    The dynamic underlying this chart is human labor being replaced by machines. That, along with global Europa realizing that diversity sucks, will drive History (in the Fukuyama sense) during the 21st century.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Olorin
    Wrong.

    The underlying dynamic here is that in the 1960s Art Sackler brought Valium's patent to the US from the company where his wife worked then became the first ad man in history to rack up $100 million in pharmaceutical sales for a single product.

    He's in the medical advertising hall of fame for that, speaking of monuments that should be torn down.

    http://theweek.com/articles/541564/how-american-opiate-epidemic-started-by-pharmaceutical-company

    He achieved this magnificent accomplishment by turning family doctors into pushers.

    The families were white. The doctors were white. The affected population was white.

    Read the above link. Read it. Read it again. The "whites depressed because of machines" meme is a lie and a distraction. It is deliberate. Don't let yourself be cucked by it. And don't try to cuck others with it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Jack D says:
    @Autochthon
    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.

    What the Hell is wrong with these people? This stuff is empirical and uncontroversial; they are literally defying reality.

    Here is a picture of young Che (left) with his family – they look pretty “white bread” to me:

    In accordance with Spanish naming customs (father’s name then mother’s) his father was named
    Ernesto Guevara y Lynch – in other words Che was a “Lynch” thru his paternal grandmother. It’s unclear (at least to me) how long the Lynches resided in Argentina – some sources trace him to Patrick (Patricio) Lynch who arrived in Argentina in the 18th century while others point to more recent ancestry.

    By appearance the Guevaras didn’t have a lot of Irish in them and I am guessing were mostly Spanish (but very little if any Amerindian). The Argentine lower classes all identify as “Spanish” but in fact, especially once you get outside of Buenos Aires, have a great deal of Indian blood (which they pretend not to notice), but the upper classes (like Che) tend to be mostly or all European (albeit Southern European ).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thea
    There is a small Welsh speaking community in Argentina. Interesting place.
    , @Anonymous
    They don't look "white bread". The connotation of "white bread" is WASPY/northern European looking, rather than white or European in general. The Jersey Shore for example would be white but not "white bread". This is why the actor Maroulis says he's not "Wonder Bread".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. bomag says:
    @JackOH
    Let me try for a "big picture-y" rationale for White as a negative intensifier. Reductio ad Hitlerum.

    The Greatest Generation returns from WWII congratulating itself for having whooped Hitler's arse. Unable to disinterestedly view Hitler's early career as a fairly benign and successful architect of national revival and national solidarity, that Greatest Generation itself becomes vulnerable to charges of racial animus and imperial aggrandizement lodged by America's Left who see their main chance in the Greatest Generation's complacency, even smugness. Bewildered, the Greatest Generation, ordinary men and women with traditional ties to church and family and country, are ideologically equated with the Hitler they defeated. Hitler, of course, was cheerleader for a political party with a virulent and explicit racialist wing.

    America's Left saw its opportunity in eliding the difference between most Whites' cordial but wary relations between Blacks, and the Nazis' attitude toward disfavored underclasses.

    So White equals negative intensifier . . . because Hitler and Nazis. The chances of some national reevaluation of Hitler and the Nazis, which is what might be needed to end the plague of nasty and unending Leftishness, is probably zip point squat because of its massive unpalatability.

    Morning coffee's kicking in. Thanks for allowing this comment.

    America’s Left saw its opportunity in eliding the difference between most Whites’ cordial but wary relations between Blacks, and the Nazis’ attitude toward disfavored underclasses.

    Some of that.

    Part of it is that “Whites” were marketed as the ultimate can-do class that was going to fix all the world’s problems. That the problems persist leads to blaming and shaming of those in power and a call for their replacement.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JackOH
    Agree. I'm genuinely baffled by how those very decent men and women who came of age in the 1930s and 1940s were so quickly ensorcelled by some truly nasty and weird ideas that seem to have found a permanent home among Democrats. I'm guessing they were blindsided by Leftists of various stripes who had long viewed their fellow Americans as a sort of enemy of goodthinking. Among some pacifists and Blacks, White Americans were almost surely greater crimethinkers than Hitler because Hitler was there and White Americans were here. You're right there are probably a few other major factors involved, but not a whole lot.

    Having grown up in the prosperous and confident America of the 1950s and 1960s, I guess I'm just tired of seeing so many Americans being scolded like a dog who'd just soiled the carpet by our truly rotten political elites.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Beckow says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    That's the problem that the Dems are running into these days. Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslims are demanding to be front and center in the party leadership and to be the candidates. White men, Jews and white women are being pushed out.

    It was one thing having Bill Clinton or Schumer or Biden chiding whites and talking about white privilege. It's another to have Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible.

    Obama got away with it in part because of his personality (a well-spoken black who frankly didn't act like other blacks) and in part because he was the first PoC to get elected to high office. But even his racial animus came out over time, and it rubbed whites the wrong way.

    Whites won't have as much patience the next time around, nor will the PoC messenger likely be as smooth as Obama.

    It's a major problem for the Dems. Luckily for them, the GOP would rather perish than stand up for whites so the Dems will be just fine because it's hard to lose if you don't have an opponent.

    “Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible…..Obama got away with it in part because of his personality”

    That’s a very good analysis. It explains the liberal media hysteria – both Dems and GOP establishment are cornered. So they lash out.

    Trump shook the system that was already wobbly. It is not possible to put it back in the box. There are too many ambitious politicians who would pick up the same themes. The best establishment option would be a neutered Trump who betrays his voters.

    The progressives are not very good with numbers. It will be another 20-30 years before they would have the PoC coalition that they seem to think already exists. They live mainly in immigrant-heavy enclaves and, as all simple people, they extrapolate. The liberal dominance depended on pacified and disinterested white voting, that is gone. It is unlikely that even 40% of whites would vote for identity-obsessed Dems. People know when they are not liked. And most pro-Trump part of America are white High School students – they will soon start voting.

    How are Dem candidates going to address the massive white majority of 70-75%? Preaching and accusations, name calling and hatred are not going to get many white votes. Once society is polarized, the largest group prevails.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Felix...

    The progressives are not very good with numbers. It will be another 20-30 years before they would have the PoC coalition that they seem to think already exists. They live mainly in immigrant-heavy enclaves and, as all simple people, they extrapolate. The liberal dominance depended on pacified and disinterested white voting, that is gone. It is unlikely that even 40% of whites would vote for identity-obsessed Dems. People know when they are not liked. And most pro-Trump part of America are white High School students – they will soon start voting.

    How are Dem candidates going to address the massive white majority of 70-75%? Preaching and accusations, name calling and hatred are not going to get many white votes. Once society is polarized, the largest group prevails.
     

    Texas and Florida. The PoC coalition you describe is already baked into those two states. It's a mathematical certainty that with the passage of at most a decade both states will become irrevocably blue as old GOP Anglos die off and vibrant PoC reach voting age. Whites can win presidential elections with just one of those states if they can continue getting the rust belt, but with both Texas and Florida off the map there is no pathway to the presidency even if Washington state, Minnesota, Oregon and other unlikely-GOP but heavily white states swing right.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. George says:

    George Clooney / Coen Bros violent white people flick:

    Toronto Film Festival: George Clooney ‘felt sick’ shooting Suburbicon

    http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-41221390

    Suburbicon Official Trailer #1 (2017) Matt Damon, Oscar Isaac Crime Comedy HD

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous-antimarxist
    So Clooney and the Coens are coming out with a hipster version of a The Turner Diaries by William Luther Pierce like tale that taps in to the dread that most HUWHITES now have of their future by projecting it back onto what their suburban protestant grandparents faced when they had to fight back all by themselves against the Sicilian Mafia.

    How Profound!!!

    Well given the number of SJW box office disasters "Hollywood" has cranked out in the past year with Dunkirk being the only exception to the trend.....

    Maybe some folks, like Clooney and the Coens, are still smart enough to realize that movies about white folks fighting for their collective survival are the only sure way so make some shekels even if one must hope that the SJW media critics don't notice enough to shut you down.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Did it not begin with Susan Sontag?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous IV
    If not Sontag, then Norman Mailer and his infamous "White Negro" essay.
    "Sophisticated" white people romanticizing blacks as more earthy and authentic goes back at least to the 1940s. By extension, it turns into self-hatred of these whites as they disown their parents' musical tastes, etc. It took til the 60s with Mailer and Sontag to openly start inverting the old hierarchy of racial superiority assumptions.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. @Anonymous
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is indeed a nationalist, but not a "white nationalist". He is a Russian nationalist. Russians are not all necessarily all that white-there are Asian and Middle Eastern admixtures in much of the Greater Russian population-but VV Putin does not care about that.

    If it's Russian, he's for it. If he thinks it's bad for Russia, he's against it. Very simple.

    He has a simple yardstick. Oh sure, he likes to wield power, and he is no ascetic or monk. He is very wealthy. But if he thinks it's bad for Russia and Russians no amount of money would sway him.

    I think Trump is a decent person in many ways, but Putin is a far more serious, a far more powerful man. I doubt America will ever really have a Putin.

    Damn shame, really.

    Yeah Putin is such a great leader that he’s almost gotten Russian life expectancy back up to soviet levels. What a man!

    Read More
    • Replies: @AM

    Yeah Putin is such a great leader that he’s almost gotten Russian life expectancy back up to soviet levels. What a man!
     
    I assume life expectancy figures did not include the millions whose lives were shortened by gulags and such in the USSR? That really tended to put a damper on retirement plans.

    I love the snark over leaders who take over nightmarish situations and make them even marginally better.

    "Sure, I probably couldn't have done any better if I were in charge, but this is a great opportunity to minimize any step in the right direction."

    , @Anonymous
    Given what happened actually that is an achievement. He has a long way to go and he knows it, but he's making progress. Only a really intelligent, ruthless, and inner-directed leader would get even that much.
    , @Anatoly Karlin
    Actually considerably above them (currently 72.5 years; peak Soviet level was 69.9 years, in 1987).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. Thea says:
    @Jack D
    Here is a picture of young Che (left) with his family - they look pretty "white bread" to me:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Chefamily.jpg

    In accordance with Spanish naming customs (father's name then mother's) his father was named
    Ernesto Guevara y Lynch - in other words Che was a "Lynch" thru his paternal grandmother. It's unclear (at least to me) how long the Lynches resided in Argentina - some sources trace him to Patrick (Patricio) Lynch who arrived in Argentina in the 18th century while others point to more recent ancestry.

    By appearance the Guevaras didn't have a lot of Irish in them and I am guessing were mostly Spanish (but very little if any Amerindian). The Argentine lower classes all identify as "Spanish" but in fact, especially once you get outside of Buenos Aires, have a great deal of Indian blood (which they pretend not to notice), but the upper classes (like Che) tend to be mostly or all European (albeit Southern European ).

    There is a small Welsh speaking community in Argentina. Interesting place.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. MEH 0910 says:
    @Tiny Duck
    Because whites have unearned privileges that are greater than their contributions

    Leonard Pitts and verysmartbrothas have written extensively on how white men continue to murder People of Color. Complaining about "anti white" stuff contributes to white supremacy. You guys are traitors tearforists and fake Americans. America is about freedom justice and the fight against racism

    You people need to get out. America does not want or need you

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color

    Also white wonen are increasingly bearing Children of Color. I cannot wait for just stick to be served

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color

    Name some examples.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tiny Duck
    elevator
    roads
    the constitution
    bathing
    automobile
    fireworks
    gunpowder
    cotton gin
    , @Anonymous
    Pyramids.
    , @Sarah Toga
    don't forget those flying pyramids
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Thea
    He is a Russian nationalist who has invited ethnic Russians back home to get free land in the Far East if they raise a Russian family there. He is a good role model for the type of leader we need but don't have. We don't want him as our leader, we want an definitively American version of Putin. Or Netenyahu.

    He has also invited the Chinese to invest there, along with associated immigration, and suppressed the local complaints – since the native white Siberians haven’t been very productive with the same land.

    The Alt-Right heads would explode.

    As said, he does what he thinks is right for Russia. Whatever it takes. Ultimately, life for the Russian equivalent of the Appalachians isn’t that much better either; he has the same contempt for “unproductive” people as any other elite. One could even argue that isn’t a choice when you have to keep competing against the world.

    On the upside, alcohol consumption has been dropping.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. @Autochthon
    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.

    What the Hell is wrong with these people? This stuff is empirical and uncontroversial; they are literally defying reality.

    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.

    I think we should get in the habit of calling him “Che Lynch,” which is of course his true surname.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Jack D says:
    @Steve Sailer
    Che's father thought his Irish ancestry was predominant in his son's personality.

    Che’s Irish (Lynch) ancestor may have been quite remote – there don’t seem to be any good family trees around but it’s possible that he was only a small % of Irish. Maybe his personality was “Irish” (rebellious) but his appearance was not. Even in his younger clean cut days he looks European but not distinctly Irish:

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    I don't feel like digging too deeply into Che's ancestry or into the genetic studies of the Irish and Spanish people, but there is an interesting genetic link between part of the Irish population and part of the Spanish population.
    , @IBC
    I was going to say that he looks like a cross between a young Reagan and Fred MacMurray, but a younger MacMurray is also a pretty good match:

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/64924500@N04/14052396062

    And later on, he started to look a little like George Clooney. Che Guevara's looks and early death are a major reason why he's become such an icon. By far, he's the most marketable of Marxists.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. @Tiny Duck
    Because whites have unearned privileges that are greater than their contributions

    Leonard Pitts and verysmartbrothas have written extensively on how white men continue to murder People of Color. Complaining about "anti white" stuff contributes to white supremacy. You guys are traitors tearforists and fake Americans. America is about freedom justice and the fight against racism

    You people need to get out. America does not want or need you

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color

    Also white wonen are increasingly bearing Children of Color. I cannot wait for just stick to be served

    “You people need to get out. America does not want or need you”

    Fine with me. Give us a place to go, and we won’t bother you again. The catch is that you have to agree not to bother us.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tiny Duck
    And leave you free to plan and work your evil?

    no thanks

    Plus you have hogged all the resources and must be forced to give it back

    "letting you go" will not accomplish that
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. @Declane
    Just out of curiosity I googled the president of Mexico to see how white he looked. He looks as white as the average Italian-American in my neighborhood. It's funny how people talk about Mexicans and racism and all that without ever acknowledging that there are basically two races in Mexico - the ones with a drop of native blood and the ones with a bucket.

    But he is 5'7" so at least he shows his solidarity with his lessers by not reaching his full European height.

    Some fraction of Mexicans (I don’t know the figures) are of 100% European descent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    No one knows the figures because Mexican's self-estimation of their European ancestry is much higher than the actual %. Almost half of Mexicans consider themselves "white" while the real # is much much lower. Probably the actual % that is 100% European (or close to it) is under 10%.
    , @anonymous
    Don't forget that some of the elite in Latin America affect a look to appear less European than they really are. From their tanned skin, to their hairdos, facial hair and clothing, they can diminish their European appearance somewhat.

    For example, here is Don Francisco of latino tv fame. Does he look a little mestizo? I thought he did, so I was surprised to find out that his mother and father had emigrated from Europe to escape WW2. Had this guy been born in the USA, he'd be another Jackie Mason.

    My guess is Vincente Fox, with his 'stache and tan, is trying to look more like the locals than what nature had intended.

    , @Old Palo Altan
    One of the blondest, as well as most beautiful, woman I ever knew was a Mexican. Not only naturally blond, but sky-blue eyes as well.
    When I first met her I asked her how long her family had been in Mexico, ecxpecting her to say that her parents had arrived from Germany in 1945.
    "450 years", she said, "give or take a decade or two".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. Who is Jennifer Senior???

    Senior is now married to Mark Horowitz Buzzfeed and NYT opinion columnist, who Senior got to abandon his first wife and kids for her.

    So my question is when Jennifer Senior is using the word “WHITE” or merely quotes Hillary using “WHITE” isn’t the truth that she does not mean “HUWHITE” or even “Bad White” but actually goyim???

    A great come back to the Seniors and to mention Hilary’s of the world would be for Trumpkins to say I am not White or a HUWHITE or even a HUWHITE GUY but a HUWHITE GOY.

    And I have GOY PRIDE, and lots of it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  115. MarcB. says:

    “white authoritarian”

    Minus a few decades in the 2oth Century of using as civil libertarianism as a stalking horse to advance their unique interests in the public spheres throughout the West, leftists are authoritarians to the core. They just happen to disdain fascism because it’s tied to blood and soil rather than a universalist ideology. That’s why HRC is qualifying the “white” variety as bad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  116. Rod1963 says:
    @Anonymous
    This picture is larger: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBapsirUMAAzdhs.jpg:large

    By the looks there are a lot of fatties in the group. It’s clear physical conditioning isn’t part of the course work.

    When they hit the streets criminals won’t have to worry about foot pursuits.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. J1234 says:

    Hillary Clinton Opens Up About ‘What Happened,’ With Candor, Defiance and Dark Humor

    Hillary inadvertently left the question mark off the title of her book.

    “He seems to want to be like Putin, a white authoritarian leader who could put down dissenters, repress minorities, disenfranchise voters, weaken the press….”

    “I don’t think so.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    Still funny as ever.

    "That's right"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. @Jim Don Bob

    Whites like Clinton, Pelosi and Schumer have no future in that party other than as field honkies.
     
    field honkies! That's great.

    field honkies! That’s great.

    Wouldn’t house crackas be more appropriate?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous-antimarxist
    "Field Honkies" is great but how about some more alternatives to go along.

    For example: "Podium Jockey" for when a "white???" beta male stands emasculated, covering his genitals and looking at his shoes, while allowing the strong and sassy black lesbian BLM activists push him aside to take their turns at the mike in accordance to their rights as part of the "progressive stack".

    https://www.google.com/search?q=photo+bernie+sanders+podium+blm&tbm=isch&imgil=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%253BGidxYzzRGYRPEM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.seattletimes.com%25252Fseattle-news%25252Fshould-protesters-have-interrupted-bernie-sanders-rally%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%252CGidxYzzRGYRPEM%252C_&usg=__L1PXicIGLYHKqLHuQtU5pLYXeOw%3D&biw=588&bih=323&ved=0ahUKEwi_psX8h6DWAhXm3YMKHSCnDqYQyjcIMw&ei=lgq4Wb-DKOa7jwSgzrqwCg#imgrc=sP_oqwszzCGeRM:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=photo+bernie+sanders+podium+blm&tbm=isch&imgil=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%253BGidxYzzR

    "Field Honky" is a awesome phrase but a little forced in its imagery , but "Podium Jockey" is even more lethal because it comes with an already established cuckoldry image you just can not erase from your brain once you see it. Furthermore it brings to mind a primal fear all men have of being castrated/emasculated by one's opponent or yet ever more dreadful, an otherwise inferior female.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. LondonBob says:
    @JeremiahJohnbalaya
    And here are the cadets: slideshow here, sample here.

    Wow, LA is brown.

    Can’t see a white cadet, bodes well for the future of law enforcement in California.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. OT: Yet again, from The Financial Times:

    UK farm growth hit as migrant workers fall after Brexit referendum

    Horticultural business forced to raise wages to retain Polish labour in wake of vote

    How did they manage before Poles became available?

    Forced to raise wages? Well, well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  121. @Anonymous
    Madison Keys looks a little like Cheryl Crow.

    I’m sure it was an innocent typographical error, but I must remark that “Cheryl Crow” impresses me as a pornographic actress’ attempt to capitalise on Sheryl Crow’s popularity.

    What ever happened to Brittnee Spears after her AVN-award-winning scene with Kevin Feederlines and Mandee Moar?

    (Okay, okay; I won’t quit my day-job….)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    It wasn't a typo, I guess I just didn't know how to spell her name correctly. I thought something didn't look quite right? :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. AndrewR says:
    @Jack D
    Che's Irish (Lynch) ancestor may have been quite remote - there don't seem to be any good family trees around but it's possible that he was only a small % of Irish. Maybe his personality was "Irish" (rebellious) but his appearance was not. Even in his younger clean cut days he looks European but not distinctly Irish:

    http://www.hey-che.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/10620688_10203495607933806_4705905265320858186_n-227x222.jpg

    I don’t feel like digging too deeply into Che’s ancestry or into the genetic studies of the Irish and Spanish people, but there is an interesting genetic link between part of the Irish population and part of the Spanish population.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mike Zwick
    The Galicians of Northern Spain are Celtic just like the Irish, Scots, and Welsh.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. Wency says:
    @Declane
    Just out of curiosity I googled the president of Mexico to see how white he looked. He looks as white as the average Italian-American in my neighborhood. It's funny how people talk about Mexicans and racism and all that without ever acknowledging that there are basically two races in Mexico - the ones with a drop of native blood and the ones with a bucket.

    But he is 5'7" so at least he shows his solidarity with his lessers by not reaching his full European height.

    Steve coined the term “Conquistador-American” for this phenomenon.

    Part of the implication is that some white Mexican-Americans have managed to claim affirmative action and the right to speak for “oppressed native peoples” while benefiting from a bloodline composed entirely of the oppressors themselves. Win-win!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. @jim jones
    Reddit thinks that Chelsea would be a good candidate:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6zm07r/they_will_get_chelsea_to_run_for_literally/

    What are they smoking?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. “a white authoritarian leader who could put down dissenters, repress minorities, disenfranchise voters, weaken the press, and amass untold billions for himself”

    Talk about projection on Hillary’s part.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  126. @J1234

    Hillary Clinton Opens Up About ‘What Happened,’ With Candor, Defiance and Dark Humor
     
    Hillary inadvertently left the question mark off the title of her book.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QtWF27OlpA

    “He seems to want to be like Putin, a white authoritarian leader who could put down dissenters, repress minorities, disenfranchise voters, weaken the press...."
     
    "I don't think so."

    Still funny as ever.

    “That’s right”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. Tiny Duck says:
    @MEH 0910

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color
     
    Name some examples.

    elevator
    roads
    the constitution
    bathing
    automobile
    fireworks
    gunpowder
    cotton gin

    Read More
    • LOL: bomag
    • Replies: @anon
    you forgot peanut butter

    also, if you're black its a pretty good trade off since africans hadnt even invented the wheel
    , @Father O'Hara
    You're gonna tell me the black man invented gunpowder?? Must've been one Hell of a death toll!
    , @Logan
    elevator
    Many people contributed, but it's generally agreed Otis solved the main problem, safety.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisha_Otis

    roads
    Don't know who "invented" roads, but the Romans are the most famous early practitioners, and they were white.

    the constitution
    Not entirely sure why you included this one. The Founders were all white guys. Or possibly you buy into the nonsense that the Constitution is based on the Iroquois system of government.

    bathing
    Nobody invented bathing, but the Romans again are the most famous early adopters.

    automobile
    Many people contributed, but Ford invented the first one that most people could afford. He was, of course, quite white.

    fireworks
    Invented by the Chinese.

    gunpowder
    Also invented by the Chinese, but white guys figured out how to use it to conquer everybody else.

    cotton gin
    Eli Whitney. White guy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Whitney
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @MEH 0910

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color
     
    Name some examples.

    Pyramids.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Tiny Duck says:
    @Sgt. Joe Friday
    "You people need to get out. America does not want or need you"

    Fine with me. Give us a place to go, and we won't bother you again. The catch is that you have to agree not to bother us.

    And leave you free to plan and work your evil?

    no thanks

    Plus you have hogged all the resources and must be forced to give it back

    “letting you go” will not accomplish that

    Read More
    • Replies: @Geschrei

    And leave you free to plan and work your evil?

    no thanks

    Plus you have hogged all the resources and must be forced to give it back

    “letting you go” will not accomplish that

     

    So, you say you want us out of America, but you aren't willing to let us go. It appears to be quite the dilemma.

    Tell us, what's your final solution?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. grapesoda says:
    @Anonymous
    Did you see Sergio Dipp's ESPN sideline report from Monday Night Football? I didn't either because I no longer watch the NFL. But anyway, Sergio (who was born in Mexicali, Mexico and attended the University of Monterrey, where he studied communications) highlighted the black coach's diversity and went into an embarrassing commentary.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQoB2flGBa4

    Because it’s ESPN. They’ve been going full SJW for years now, in spite of tanking ratings and financial difficulties.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-28/espn-can-t-afford-to-go-on-like-this

    http://www.businessinsider.com/espns-layoffs-spell-trouble-for-live-sports-2017-3

    They also had a “groundbreaking” female-only announcing crew for the Monday night game, which all non-SJWs thought was terrible.

    ESPN is the Democratic Party of cable channels, ie too arrogant to try to correct their mistakes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @penskefile

    They also had a “groundbreaking” female-only announcing crew for the Monday night game, which all non-SJWs thought was terrible.
     
    Wait - is Rex Ryan transitioning?? This stuff really is contagious!
    , @Anonymous IV
    I've actually grown to half-way like Doris Burke on NBA broadcasts (doing commentary, not play-by-play) so I consider myself open-minded to the idea, but I thought the MNF broadcast was--well, not terrible, but it wasn't great. There is no doubt the only reason she got that spot was because she was a woman. She doesn't have that great a voice and was at best merely competent. She didn't seem to realize the final kick had been blocked--it was up to the male commentator to point that out--she just said it was missed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. biz says:
    @AndrewR
    Because the Japanese were neither subject to nor rebellious against Ashkenazi Supremacy.

    Or maybe because Germany surrendered and Japan didn’t?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Autochthon
    Kabuki theatre, was it? Akin to the staged moon-landing and the pretense the Earth is not flat...?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. @Anonymous
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is indeed a nationalist, but not a "white nationalist". He is a Russian nationalist. Russians are not all necessarily all that white-there are Asian and Middle Eastern admixtures in much of the Greater Russian population-but VV Putin does not care about that.

    If it's Russian, he's for it. If he thinks it's bad for Russia, he's against it. Very simple.

    He has a simple yardstick. Oh sure, he likes to wield power, and he is no ascetic or monk. He is very wealthy. But if he thinks it's bad for Russia and Russians no amount of money would sway him.

    I think Trump is a decent person in many ways, but Putin is a far more serious, a far more powerful man. I doubt America will ever really have a Putin.

    Damn shame, really.

    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is indeed a nationalist, but not a “white nationalist”. He is a Russian nationalist.

    Putin triangulates between economic and ideological blocs, with nationalists being one of several other influential ones.

    Although he throws a bone – not to mention the occasional kick – to Russian nationalists now and then, that does not make him one himself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. songbird says:
    @Autochthon
    Guevara was white, an Argentine of Spanish and Irish extraction.

    What the Hell is wrong with these people? This stuff is empirical and uncontroversial; they are literally defying reality.

    When a POC entertainer says something anti-white that equals self-promotion.

    Classic example Whoopi Goldberg. She heard about Star Trek TNG from Levar Burton (who had been in Roots and now was chief engineer). She told him to ask about her getting a role. She was ignored, until she made the call and was given the courtesy of a meeting. She asked if there was only one black guy who was a lieutenant in Roddenberry’s hopeful future. She got a role, which they created for her, after her complaint. Not just any role but an all-wise, quasi-immortal black lady with mysterious powers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Joe Sweet says:
    @AndrewR
    Anti-white rhetoric in general seemed to skyrocket around 2012.

    Yep. Just as Obama was catching his stride.

    I noticed it in 2011 when I was hanging around with a Philosophy adjunct professor who’s 7/16 native ancestry, femaleness, Judeophilia, and shameless fag-haggery apparently granted her the privilege to use white as an epithet despite the fact that she looked pretty white and all of her tastes landed squarely in the SWPL category. This must have been fairly early in the explicit white bashing juggernaut because at that time many of her facebook “friends” spoke up in their own defense in reaction to her posts that impugned something as being “so white.” I doubt liberal white facebookers stand up for themselves like that these days.

    Read More
    • LOL: Joe Sweet
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Only a literal Nazi would object to anti-white rhetoric.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Jack D says:
    @Frau Katze
    Some fraction of Mexicans (I don't know the figures) are of 100% European descent.

    No one knows the figures because Mexican’s self-estimation of their European ancestry is much higher than the actual %. Almost half of Mexicans consider themselves “white” while the real # is much much lower. Probably the actual % that is 100% European (or close to it) is under 10%.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. @Anonymous
    Madison Keys looks a little like Cheryl Crow.

    …but with a hideous overbite and a lantern chin.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Jack D says:
    @AndrewR
    Having said all that, it is kinda surprising that in a city as huge and cosmopolitan as Boston that the casting directors were unable to find an Argentinian of similar ethnic background to play Che, or at least an American with Che's approximate admixture.

    Just be glad that they got a more or less white guy. The modern casting trend would be to get some Nigerian to play Che.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    I recently watched Narcos on Netflix. Let's just say that a significant amount of "whitewashing" was done: characters who IRL were at least noticeably mestizo if not overwhelmingly indio were played by much whiter actors. In one case, there's a general who has a two flashback scenes: one from his childhood and one as a young man. In both the flashback scenes he's played by actors who may actually be 100% non-white, but as a late middle aged man he's played by a man who looks fresh off the boat from Madrid.

    I believe there's also characters played by actors less white than the real people off of whom they're based.

    The most amusing miscasting is of the first two season's main character: Pablo Escobar. Wagner Moura is no less white than Escobar was but not only is he not from Medellin, or Colombia, he's not even a native Spanish speaker.

    One of the Cali Cartel's capos is played by a Portuguese guy too.

    All and all it's a great show but I chuckled at some of the casting choices.
    It's probably relatively immune to SJW rent-seeking given that most [all???] SJWs are really stupid and don't understand racial realities in Latin America.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous
    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it’s used against Japan.

    Einstein was a "peace-loving" man. Seriously. Some years ago, two kids in my son's 3rd grade class did biography book reports on Einstein, anad both kids mentioned that Einstein was "peace-loving." I thought it was very odd.

    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    “Whatever reason” might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Do you know what role might Einstein's ideas may have played in the ongoing march toward multiculturalism and open borders? According to a write-up on him on the American Museum of Natural History website:

    Einstein's passionate commitment to the cause of global peace led him to support the creation of a single, unified world government. Einstein thought that patriotic zeal often became an excuse for violence: "As a citizen of Germany," he wrote in 1947, "I saw how excessive nationalism can spread like a disease, bringing tragedy to millions." To combat this "disease," Einstein wanted to eliminate nationalistic sentiments—first by erasing the political borders between countries and then by instituting an international government with sovereignty over individual states. During World War I, Einstein supported the formation of the "United States of Europe." He later endorsed the League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations. But Einstein worried that the United Nations did not have enough authority to ensure world peace.

    Einstein himself seemed to have little regard for national boundaries. His true allegiance was simply to the human race: "I am by heritage a Jew, by citizenship a Swiss, and by makeup a human being, and only a human being, without any special attachment to any state or national entity whatsoever."

    Einstein considered himself a citizen of the world. He lived in several European countries before moving to the United States, and he also traveled extensively, visiting countries including Palestine, Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. In 1922, Einstein and his wife Elsa boarded the S.S. Kitano Maru bound for Japan. The trip also took them to other ports including Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shanghai.

    What's somewhat interesting about this view he had of himself is that it fits so neatly with the stereotype - for good or for bad - of the rootless, cosmopolitan Jew. However, this bouncing around from countr to country is not the typical experience for most people. Did he not realize that what was good for him would be seen as a negative by most people?

    Einstein moved to the United States in 1933, after fleeing Nazi Germany. At the time he commented, "As long as I have any choice in the matter, I will live only in a country where civil liberty, tolerance, and equality of all citizens before the law are the rule." He became an American citizen seven years later.

    Einstein saw world government as the only way to ensure lasting world peace. But he was skeptical that an organization like the United Nations—which answered to the national governments of its member states—could prevent future wars. In Einstein's view, world peace would be guaranteed only when the leaders of individual nations answered to a single, supranational government.

    Is multiculturalism and open borders being done with the goal of world peace?

    , @Anonymous
    Before 1943 the Germans didn't think they needed such weapons. After 1942 they realised they didn't have time to develop them.

    They also dropped the ball w.r.t. rocketry and jet propulsion, which were developed into working weapons far later than they should have been.
    , @JerseyJeffersonian
    Jack D,

    One of the reasons that the Germans did not get very far along with development of the atomic bomb was that the British, working in close collaboration with the Norwegian resistance, first sabotaged the Norwegian facility in which they were producing heavy water, but not completely, and then later, after waiting until the Germans had produced several tanker train cars full of heavy water from the plant that then had to be transported on a ferry down a fjord for export to Germany, they then sank the ferry when it was over the deepest part of the fjord (very deep indeed) by means of a bomb aboard the ferry. This cost the lives of innocent Norwegians, but the resistance adjudged this sacrifice to be justified by the result.

    If I remember correctly, the great German physicist, Werner Heisenberg, who had been drafted to explore the potential for such a weapon, but who was secretly horrified by the prospect of putting this at the disposal of the Nazi regime, was also dragging his feet, and slowing down the work.

    So these are two reasons beyond the hard-core Nazi predisposition against Jüdische Physik that the German program did not progress.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous
    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it’s used against Japan.

    Einstein was a "peace-loving" man. Seriously. Some years ago, two kids in my son's 3rd grade class did biography book reports on Einstein, anad both kids mentioned that Einstein was "peace-loving." I thought it was very odd.

    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    “Whatever reason” might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.

    Read More
    • LOL: AndrewR
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    “Whatever reason” might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.
     
    They didn't and it wasn't. Nobody outside of a handful of old and ambitious regime-aligned physicists, such as Stark and Lenard, believed all that crap about "jewish physics". Germany didn't lack for scientific and technical talent, even considering the exodus of physicists in the 30s. What they lacked was the material capability. Fighting a war on 1 1/2 - 2 fronts, and occupying most of Europe, and only being a nation of about 90 million (including Austria, and various other german enclaves), they just didn't have the wherewithal for such a massive undertaking. Especially as they were already engaged in another massive weapons program (which, as it happened, had no real military value) - the development of ballistic missiles. Heisenberg and others had concluded early on in the War that developing a nuclear weapon (if it were possible at all) could never be accomplished in time to have any impact on the outcome of the War. I believe they thought that applied to us too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous
    I would guess for the same reason that Einstein encouaged the development of the atomic bomb to be used against Germany but regretted it’s used against Japan.

    Einstein was a "peace-loving" man. Seriously. Some years ago, two kids in my son's 3rd grade class did biography book reports on Einstein, anad both kids mentioned that Einstein was "peace-loving." I thought it was very odd.

    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    “Whatever reason” might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Einstein was in theory a pacifist, right? In fact he was a military-industrial complex enabler or worse.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. AndrewR says:
    @Jack D
    Just be glad that they got a more or less white guy. The modern casting trend would be to get some Nigerian to play Che.

    I recently watched Narcos on Netflix. Let’s just say that a significant amount of “whitewashing” was done: characters who IRL were at least noticeably mestizo if not overwhelmingly indio were played by much whiter actors. In one case, there’s a general who has a two flashback scenes: one from his childhood and one as a young man. In both the flashback scenes he’s played by actors who may actually be 100% non-white, but as a late middle aged man he’s played by a man who looks fresh off the boat from Madrid.

    I believe there’s also characters played by actors less white than the real people off of whom they’re based.

    The most amusing miscasting is of the first two season’s main character: Pablo Escobar. Wagner Moura is no less white than Escobar was but not only is he not from Medellin, or Colombia, he’s not even a native Spanish speaker.

    One of the Cali Cartel’s capos is played by a Portuguese guy too.

    All and all it’s a great show but I chuckled at some of the casting choices.
    It’s probably relatively immune to SJW rent-seeking given that most [all???] SJWs are really stupid and don’t understand racial realities in Latin America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yak-15
    Have you seen Season 3 yet? They feature some full-blown SJW poz with an intimate gay dancing scene with Pacho. It was so unnecessary and so graphic. Really turned me off from watching any more of the show.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. @NickG
    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview, said that Hillary is not very bright. I think he is right.

    Combine this with her being in a filter bubble, it seems likely that she, and hopefully the Dems too, cannot resist doubling down on identity politics, with whites as the bogey man. Being whites themselves, they see being ostentatiously anti white as a status symbol. They are running some weird combination of primate dominance display, combined with a bird of paradise like virtue signal. No doubt Jordan Peterson could wax lyrical on what's going on.

    They seem not to understand cause and effect....of karma. Identity politics begets identity politics and whites are, ever so gently for now, starting to play. The Dems themselves have and still are strategically facilitating the Sailer strategy. Many of us badwhites think this is wonderful, it's certainly entertaining.

    Steve Bannon points out that many of the brighter pinkoes know this doubling down on identity politics is an error. But it seems likely that the identity politics push has gotten an unstoppable momentum of its own. Hopefully they will pick another POC as their next leader, here's hoping for Kamala Harris.

    The Bannon interview was fun to watch. I wish they'd just played the full thing without editing. I guess that's too much to expect.

    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview,

    I’m glad somebody brought up this interview, because I need to unburden myself of a most disquieting sensation. I feel like I’m in The Twilight Zone whenever I hear people on our side talk about how wonderful that interview was, as if one morning I woke up the same and everybody else was different.

    A word to the wise here—that interview was atrocious. Steve Bannon comes across as an unhinged zealot: Bloodshot eyes, interruptive speech, delusions of grandeur. He seems to think he’s still playing some sort of vital role within the Trump administration, although paradoxically from “outside” it. The fact of the matter, as is becoming quite clear, is just the opposite. Bannon was apparently always a marginal figure in Trump’s circle and with Trump’s increasingly establishment drift, there is no longer any use for him. This must have come as a blow to Bannon’s ego. He once thought (and had many others thinking) that he was the indispensable architect of the victorious Trump movement. That idea has turned out to be largely a myth created by himself.

    In compensation, Bannon has taken to running Breitbart as if it were his own personal vanity site. The features now consist of basically two kinds: 1) Articles about Steve Bannon; and 2) Articles about articles about Steve Bannon. This is is recurring theme with Breitbart and is reminiscent of the turbo-gonzo days of Milo Yiannopoulos.

    What’s worse is the actual content of Steve Bannon’s vision for the country. He styles himself as a defender of “radical unity,” meaning that Americans of every race, religion, and sexual orientation will find common cause in his program of economic nationalism.

    It is impossible to overstate how stupid that is. Replace economic nationalism with “muh free market” and there is nothing to distinguish this from the cuckservativism of DR3 and “enterprise zones,” except that Bannon’s version lacks the gibs and graft necessary to actually make the spoils system work.

    Steve Bannon is an epic failure as a statesman. Whether its his grandiose but inaccurate historiographies (“Firing James Comey was the worst mistake in modern political history”) or his cowardly hypocrisy (“We committed the original sin of the Trump administration; we embraced the establishment”), he is an unstable, self-promoting, and self-aggrandizing lunatic who has no place anywhere near the corridors of power.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NickG

    Steve Bannon comes across as an unhinged zealot:

     

    Yup, to many that would never going to vote Trump. But then few normal - non political junkie - folks, especially swing voters, know who Bannon is!

    Steve Bannon is an epic failure as a statesman
     
    Yup I agree, and in the same vein our host here would be an epic failure transitioning to a career as a female ramp model. I suspect both Steve's share similar levels of expectation of success in each respective profession. Bannon was a behind the scenes geezer; he was never on the cards as a 'statesman'.

    Bannon is, no doubt, a pugnacious bombastic geezer. What his contribution to Trump's ideological underpinnings, or the campaign's against the odds success, is difficult to say on the level of the inside gen most of us here have. What we can say is that Bannon was billed as Trump's Campaign co-ordinator and contrary to most predictions, Trump won.

    Was he fired, was he pushed, did he flounce off, does he feel he can be more effective outside the administration....I suspect it's something of all 4. Does he still have Trump's ear...I suspect not directly.
    , @Vinteuil
    "I feel like I’m in The Twilight Zone whenever I hear people on our side talk about how wonderful [Bannon's] interview was, as if one morning I woke up the same and everybody else was different."

    Maybe your idea of what counts as "our side" isn't very widely shared?

    "Bloodshot eyes" - agreed. He has a face made for radio. So what?

    "Bannon has taken to running Breitbart as if it were his own personal vanity site. The features now consist of basically two kinds: 1) Articles about Steve Bannon; and 2) Articles about articles about Steve Bannon."

    This is a ridiculous falsehood, as even the most cursory visit to the site will reveal.

    "Replace economic nationalism with 'muh free market' and there is nothing to distinguish this from the cuckservativism of DR3 and 'enterprise zones'..."

    Your point here is, as professional philosophers like to say, "under-described."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. Joe Sweet says:
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Before “white” was an insult, it was “white bread.”
     
    The trope lives on! In name-brand form here:

    Slated to play Che Guevara is Constantine Maroulis, a former “American Idol’’ contestant who earned a Tony Award nomination for his performance on Broadway in “Rock of Ages.’’ Maroulis is Greek-American. In a recent Globe interview, Maroulis said he believes concerns about him playing Che are not justified. Saying “I’m not exactly a loaf of Wonder Bread,’’ he cited the discrimination encountered by his grandparents when they immigrated to the United States.
     

    along those same lines…Here’s George Clooney defending his current movie at the SWPL Olympiad known as the Toronto International Film Festival against charges of tone-deaf portrayal of blacks (and other race issues in Hollywood).

    http://www.indiewire.com/2017/09/george-clooney-interview-suburbicon-diversity-hollywood-1201874750/

    “Of course, Charlottesville happens, because every few years Charlottesville happens again,” he said. “We keep forgetting that we haven’t excised that original sin completely. When I was growing up in Kentucky, the civil-rights movement had its big wave and segregation was exorcised from this country. We really felt like we were on this trajectory toward it all being finished. It wasn’t something you thought would be around. It’s a surprise that it’s still a part of our world.”

    As a filmmaker, Clooney said it took years for him to tackle race because he had yet to find the right project. “A lot of people ask me why I haven’t done any movies about Darfur or South Sudan,” he said, recalling his advocacy in the region. “Well, I haven’t found the script that’s right to do it. My personal life and where I go — philanthropic things — have always been toward whatever is inclusive, not exclusive. That’s always been an important part of my life. It’s just hard to find those films.”

    But Clooney added that he would rather see more minority filmmakers work their way into the industry, echoing the rise of Mexican filmmakers in Hollywood over a decade ago —the so-called “Three Amigos” of Alfonso Cuaron, Alejandro Gonzalez Iñarritu, and Guillermo del Toro, whose “The Shape of Water” just won the Golden Lion at the Venice International Film Festival.

    “All these great Mexican filmmakers showed up, it was like, fuck, this is great filmmaking,” Clooney said. “That’s what I’d like to see… some really interesting young filmmakers out there. You want to feel something fresh and new constantly. You want people pushing the limits. There’s a way to make things much cheaper now so there are a lot of different voices out there.”

    What a nitwit. He apparently thinks because these three Mexican directors have names similar to the guys who do the yard work at his LA mansion that they look like his gardeners too. There’s nothing “minority” about those three amigos unless you are taking the global view and are recognizing that whites are a minority.

    http://www.trbimg.com/img-54e7f3ee/turbine/la-apphoto-fox-s-golden-globe-awards-party1-jpg-20150220/1150/1150×647

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    Of course, famous actor and hypocrite George Clooney recently fled Europe because of diversity:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/07/06/clooney-moving-twins-back-america-security-reasons/
    , @Thea
    Lends credence to the idea you must sell your soul and worship Jewish filmmakers to make it in Hollywood.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    OT: From the Albuquerque Journal a new New Mexican starts out on the road to Red Pill City.

    We can do better: You can live with a scofflaw culture, but those of us who don’t are leaving. Good luck!

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    She is on the way, but I think she needs to take a field trip to post-Somali Minneapolis:

    I come from Minnesota, land of the Lutheran. In Minnesota, the police pull you over if you are going 5 mph over the speed limit. And there are actually police to pull you over. Drinking and driving? You lose your license the first time. As it should be.
     
    P.S. Agree with it or not that article is a good example of state-level immigriping.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. @Johann Ricke

    field honkies! That’s great.
     
    Wouldn't house crackas be more appropriate?

    “Field Honkies” is great but how about some more alternatives to go along.

    For example: “Podium Jockey” for when a “white???” beta male stands emasculated, covering his genitals and looking at his shoes, while allowing the strong and sassy black lesbian BLM activists push him aside to take their turns at the mike in accordance to their rights as part of the “progressive stack”.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=photo+bernie+sanders+podium+blm&tbm=isch&imgil=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%253BGidxYzzRGYRPEM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.seattletimes.com%25252Fseattle-news%25252Fshould-protesters-have-interrupted-bernie-sanders-rally%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%252CGidxYzzRGYRPEM%252C_&usg=__L1PXicIGLYHKqLHuQtU5pLYXeOw%3D&biw=588&bih=323&ved=0ahUKEwi_psX8h6DWAhXm3YMKHSCnDqYQyjcIMw&ei=lgq4Wb-DKOa7jwSgzrqwCg#imgrc=sP_oqwszzCGeRM:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=photo+bernie+sanders+podium+blm&tbm=isch&imgil=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%253BGidxYzzR

    “Field Honky” is a awesome phrase but a little forced in its imagery , but “Podium Jockey” is even more lethal because it comes with an already established cuckoldry image you just can not erase from your brain once you see it. Furthermore it brings to mind a primal fear all men have of being castrated/emasculated by one’s opponent or yet ever more dreadful, an otherwise inferior female.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous-antimarxist
    About “Podium Jockey”;

    While it is an obvious play on Lawn Jockey, Lawn Jockey is really a misnomer. "Lawn Footman" would have been more correct, since it was the footman's job to help his master dismount his horse or carriage and to walk the horses to the stable for a cool down and put them to down for the night in the stables.

    When middle class first folks moved to the suburbs and still thought as their cars as horseless carriages, the idea of having a symbolic statue posing as a Lawn Jockey or Footman was a nice touch.

    Still the idea of "white???" politician letting POC minorities have the microphone while they stand looking on and emasculated is a powerful image.

    Instead of "Field Honky" I think "House Honky" is better. And it is not just because of the alliteration but because the "House Honky" unlike the "Field Honky" can actually delude himself that people still care about his status and what he has to say.

    Increasingly White???, and especially White Goyim Democrats may delude themselves that what they think matters but they will find themselves viewed as irrelevant by those POC voters that they must have the support of.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @ChrisZ
    To me, a milestone in the public shaming of whites came at the conclusion of Pres. Obama's first inaugural. The benediction by Rev. Joseph Lowery ended on the following note:

    "Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get back, when brown can stick around — (laughter) — when yellow will be mellow — (laughter) — when the red man can get ahead, man — (laughter) — and when white will embrace what is right.
    "Let all those who do justice and love mercy say amen."
    AUDIENCE: "Amen!"
    REV. LOWERY: "Say amen –"
    AUDIENCE: "Amen!"
    REV. LOWERY: "— and amen."
    AUDIENCE: "Amen!" (Cheers, applause.)

    Everyone on the coalition of fringes recognized this as a cock-a-doodle-doo of victory over "the Man." (On the broadcast I watched [not the one linked below] you could hear and see former VP Gore whooping it up the most, in a telling little moment of schadenfreude.) Rev. Lowery (no relation to Rich, I believe) himself became a minor celebrity (for the quarter-hour following; having served his function he was promptly forgotten).

    In the room where I watched the ceremony, most everyone oohed and aahed at the funny-old-black-reverend-who-tells-it-like-it-is (TM). I was the only one to call it disgraceful to strike a note of racial animus in a presidential inaugural.

    What really irked me was that anyone would waste the occasion by regurgitating such stale, sing-song doggerel. But the great and good loved it; and public prayer has been amateur hour ever since.

    Here's a transcript and video link:
    ‪http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/stevenwaldman/2009/01/rev-lowery-inauguration-benedi.html‬

    “stale, sing-song doggerel”, good one.

    It’s how I imagine Cornel West’s recent chant as the 2017 Convocation speaker at Harvard Divinity School, which he called: Spiritual Blackout, Imperial Meltdown, Prophetic Fightback.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. HBD Guy says:

    I don’t get it. If she has such a distaste for White Men, why is she still married to Blow Job Bill?

    Read More
    • Replies: @res

    If sShe has such a distaste for White Men, why is she because she is still married to Blow Job Bill?.
     
    FTFY
    , @black sea
    Bill was, as you may remember, our first African-American president, and Hillary is deluded enough to imagine this affords her some honorary POC status, notwithstanding the fact someone like Sarah Palin is, by comparison to her, practically an indigene.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D
    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    "Whatever reason" might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.

    Einstein was in theory a pacifist, right? In fact he was a military-industrial complex enabler or worse.

    Read More
    • Agree: AM
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Autochthon
    I'm sure it was an innocent typographical error, but I must remark that "Cheryl Crow" impresses me as a pornographic actress' attempt to capitalise on Sheryl Crow's popularity.

    What ever happened to Brittnee Spears after her AVN-award-winning scene with Kevin Feederlines and Mandee Moar?

    (Okay, okay; I won't quit my day-job....)

    It wasn’t a typo, I guess I just didn’t know how to spell her name correctly. I thought something didn’t look quite right? :)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Frau Katze
    Some fraction of Mexicans (I don't know the figures) are of 100% European descent.

    Don’t forget that some of the elite in Latin America affect a look to appear less European than they really are. From their tanned skin, to their hairdos, facial hair and clothing, they can diminish their European appearance somewhat.

    For example, here is Don Francisco of latino tv fame. Does he look a little mestizo? I thought he did, so I was surprised to find out that his mother and father had emigrated from Europe to escape WW2. Had this guy been born in the USA, he’d be another Jackie Mason.

    My guess is Vincente Fox, with his ‘stache and tan, is trying to look more like the locals than what nature had intended.

    Read More
    • Agree: Frau Katze
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez getting in touch with his pure Mexican heritage.
    http://static.highsnobiety.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/19203426/canelo-alvarez-interview-boxing-vs-mma-03-1200x800.jpg

    Or is Conor McGregor actually Mexican?
    http://wrestlingnews.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Conor-McGregor.jpg

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. AB- says:

    Jack D; THREE identical posts??

    With a trembling finger/hand like that, you should get to a doctor and see if it’s Parkinson’s….having trouble with the TV remote or phone dialing?

    A former girlfriend used to send multiple copies of the same email. She got upset when I called them Parkinsonian.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    I have the hands of a surgeon but Bill Gates is in charge of my computer and Comcast is in charge of my internet connection, so I blame one or both of them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D
    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    "Whatever reason" might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.

    Do you know what role might Einstein’s ideas may have played in the ongoing march toward multiculturalism and open borders? According to a write-up on him on the American Museum of Natural History website:

    Einstein’s passionate commitment to the cause of global peace led him to support the creation of a single, unified world government. Einstein thought that patriotic zeal often became an excuse for violence: “As a citizen of Germany,” he wrote in 1947, “I saw how excessive nationalism can spread like a disease, bringing tragedy to millions.” To combat this “disease,” Einstein wanted to eliminate nationalistic sentiments—first by erasing the political borders between countries and then by instituting an international government with sovereignty over individual states. During World War I, Einstein supported the formation of the “United States of Europe.” He later endorsed the League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations. But Einstein worried that the United Nations did not have enough authority to ensure world peace.

    Einstein himself seemed to have little regard for national boundaries. His true allegiance was simply to the human race: “I am by heritage a Jew, by citizenship a Swiss, and by makeup a human being, and only a human being, without any special attachment to any state or national entity whatsoever.”

    Einstein considered himself a citizen of the world. He lived in several European countries before moving to the United States, and he also traveled extensively, visiting countries including Palestine, Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. In 1922, Einstein and his wife Elsa boarded the S.S. Kitano Maru bound for Japan. The trip also took them to other ports including Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shanghai.

    What’s somewhat interesting about this view he had of himself is that it fits so neatly with the stereotype – for good or for bad – of the rootless, cosmopolitan Jew. However, this bouncing around from countr to country is not the typical experience for most people. Did he not realize that what was good for him would be seen as a negative by most people?

    Einstein moved to the United States in 1933, after fleeing Nazi Germany. At the time he commented, “As long as I have any choice in the matter, I will live only in a country where civil liberty, tolerance, and equality of all citizens before the law are the rule.” He became an American citizen seven years later.

    Einstein saw world government as the only way to ensure lasting world peace. But he was skeptical that an organization like the United Nations—which answered to the national governments of its member states—could prevent future wars. In Einstein’s view, world peace would be guaranteed only when the leaders of individual nations answered to a single, supranational government.

    Is multiculturalism and open borders being done with the goal of world peace?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D

    Do you know what role might Einstein’s ideas may have played in the ongoing march toward multiculturalism and open borders?
     
    Little to none. Einstein was considered to be a brilliant scientist but a sort of "absent minded professor" who would sometimes forget to wear socks, so no one took his political musings seriously.

    As you say, most people are nationalists to one degree or another and don't like the idea of being unattached to any country. You could see though how, for a Jew of Einstein's generation, seeing what Hitler did with German nationalism might sour you on the idea of nationalism altogether. While it is not practical or wise to move millions upon billions of Asians and Africans to Europe or the US, at Einstein's level (the level of top scientist and other super talented individuals - artists, athletes, etc.) Einstein's vision is in fact correct as a practical matter and Einstein was only giving voice to what the actual reality is today and even in Einstein's time, where great talent flows to where it is most appreciated and most highly compensated. The great failure of our era is not that Einsteins consider themselves world citizens but that we are unable (or unwilling) to distinguish clock boys from Einsteins.
    , @Samuel Skinner

    Einstein thought highly of Lenin, saying: "I honor Lenin as a man who completely sacrificed himself and devoted all his energy to the realization of social justice. I do not consider his methods practical, but one thing is certain: men of his type are the guardians and restorers of humanity."
     
    (wikipedia)

    Yeah, Einstein was a red (useful idiot to be precise). He isn't the cause of those opinions; he was just reiterating beliefs that were popular among the intellectual classes at the time.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    See, this goes along with what I've seen a lot, otherwise intelligent people on the web that are just completely ignorant in other areas. OTOH, physicists (and mathematicians, for that matter) are known as men who don't particularly have a lot of common sense due to lack of experience in the actual world. I've got quite a few examples in my head.

    I will live only in a country where civil liberty, tolerance, and equality of all citizens before the law are the rule.” He became an American citizen seven years later.
     
    I'd think a bit of nationalism would be a pretty good thing once one found himself in a country that does have civil liberty, tolerance, and equality, at least based on his opinion of those principles. I mean, what are you gonna do if the country goes under, and there is no place left with what you valued in this society? Huh, nice work Einstein.

    In Einstein’s view, world peace would be guaranteed only when the leaders of individual nations answered to a single, supranational government.
     
    Ever heard of a civil war, or read the book 1984? Who's gonna help bring down the regime when you have totalitarianism in the only sovereign in the world? Martians? Think again, (LITERALLY) Einstein!

    Man, we're going to have to change a few expressions, the more we learn about these "geniuses" and "holy men". "Nice going, Einstein!" will now be "Nice going, Newton!" and "Is the Pope Catholic?" will now be "Is the Pope a Latino Commie?"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D
    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    "Whatever reason" might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.

    Before 1943 the Germans didn’t think they needed such weapons. After 1942 they realised they didn’t have time to develop them.

    They also dropped the ball w.r.t. rocketry and jet propulsion, which were developed into working weapons far later than they should have been.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. AndrewR says:
    @Joe Sweet
    Yep. Just as Obama was catching his stride.

    I noticed it in 2011 when I was hanging around with a Philosophy adjunct professor who's 7/16 native ancestry, femaleness, Judeophilia, and shameless fag-haggery apparently granted her the privilege to use white as an epithet despite the fact that she looked pretty white and all of her tastes landed squarely in the SWPL category. This must have been fairly early in the explicit white bashing juggernaut because at that time many of her facebook "friends" spoke up in their own defense in reaction to her posts that impugned something as being "so white." I doubt liberal white facebookers stand up for themselves like that these days.

    Only a literal Nazi would object to anti-white rhetoric.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. res says:
    @Anonymous
    OT: From the Albuquerque Journal a new New Mexican starts out on the road to Red Pill City.

    We can do better: You can live with a scofflaw culture, but those of us who don’t are leaving. Good luck!

    She is on the way, but I think she needs to take a field trip to post-Somali Minneapolis:

    I come from Minnesota, land of the Lutheran. In Minnesota, the police pull you over if you are going 5 mph over the speed limit. And there are actually police to pull you over. Drinking and driving? You lose your license the first time. As it should be.

    P.S. Agree with it or not that article is a good example of state-level immigriping.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I don't quite see it as immigriping: a.) she says she's leaving (if only other immigripers would do the same); b.) she's not asking for special status or protection - she asks for rule of law.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. res says:
    @HBD Guy
    I don't get it. If she has such a distaste for White Men, why is she still married to Blow Job Bill?

    If sShe has such a distaste for White Men, why is she because she is still married to Blow Job Bill?.

    FTFY

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  158. black sea says:
    @HBD Guy
    I don't get it. If she has such a distaste for White Men, why is she still married to Blow Job Bill?

    Bill was, as you may remember, our first African-American president, and Hillary is deluded enough to imagine this affords her some honorary POC status, notwithstanding the fact someone like Sarah Palin is, by comparison to her, practically an indigene.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    See for example Hillary speaking in black dialect:

    https://youtu.be/6FlpbRFXC9E?t=14

    If Romney tried something like this it would be horrible, racist cultural appropriation and lightning bolts would descend from the heavens and strike him down for such a sin, but Hillary, as the spouse of an honorary black man can get away with this (although I am sure that it did not really endear her to black people - she is not really an endearing person, period). A lot of what white liberals do is not actually intended to appeal to blacks (who are loyal Democrat voters for so long as the food stamps flow) but to nice white liberal ladies who imagine that this is what blacks like.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. Pat Boyle says:
    @hhsiii
    Who is her ghostwriter? Presumably she approved that after her 4th pre-5:00 Chardonnay. The only white she appreciates.

    I have recently discovered an $8.00 Chardonnay that tastes like a $30.00 Chardonnay. But I won’t tell you what it is, lest you buy it all up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. @George
    George Clooney / Coen Bros violent white people flick:

    Toronto Film Festival: George Clooney 'felt sick' shooting Suburbicon
    http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-41221390

    Suburbicon Official Trailer #1 (2017) Matt Damon, Oscar Isaac Crime Comedy HD

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBezc1S1BAQ

    So Clooney and the Coens are coming out with a hipster version of a The Turner Diaries by William Luther Pierce like tale that taps in to the dread that most HUWHITES now have of their future by projecting it back onto what their suburban protestant grandparents faced when they had to fight back all by themselves against the Sicilian Mafia.

    How Profound!!!

    Well given the number of SJW box office disasters “Hollywood” has cranked out in the past year with Dunkirk being the only exception to the trend…..

    Maybe some folks, like Clooney and the Coens, are still smart enough to realize that movies about white folks fighting for their collective survival are the only sure way so make some shekels even if one must hope that the SJW media critics don’t notice enough to shut you down.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. Hillary Clinton sits and stews in her own venomous juices in her compound in the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York. When Hillary Clinton ventures out of her compound she demands to be paid huge amounts of loot to make appearances to push her book about her failed campaign for president. Can you imagine the number of mini bottles of booze that Hillary Clinton will be swigging as she goes from city to city selling her crappy book to dingbat White ladies?

    President Trump is a billionaire who used the immigration issue as a wedge to pry many White votes away from the Democrat Party. Mass immigration is very harmful to the interests of Whites Without College Degrees(WWCDs). Mass immigration lowers wages, increases housing costs, increases income inequality, swamps schools, overwhelms hospitals, causes habitat-destroying sprawl, brings Islamic terrorism to the United States and creates multicultural mayhem. Hillary Clinton and the Democrats pushed mass legal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien infiltrators.

    These Tweets from 2015 look prescient to me now, he says humbly:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  162. @eah
    OT

    Inside The Opioid Crisis: What The Mainstream Media Won't Let You See

    http://stockboardasset.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Screen-Shot-2017-09-11-at-9.23.02-AM-1.png

    Damn, I hate graphs with y-values other than zero at the bottom! I have to mentally figure where the real x-axis is and then scale off in my head how the curves really relate. I know it’s not your graph, eah, but that is no way to make a graph.

    If the BLS or whoever has a point to make, then they should blow up the important part of the curves on another graph, but show the BIG PICTURE first, or they’re being duplicitous (sometimes, it’s just because the maker of the graph just lets excel or whatever make the axes and is too dumb or lazy to set them right. Oh, US Feral Government. But, of course!)

    OK, enough, and, no, I am not Rantly McTirade’s twin brother, but that’s one hell of a great handle!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    Agree completely. Dishonest graphs are one of my many pet peeves.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. @NickG
    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview, said that Hillary is not very bright. I think he is right.

    Combine this with her being in a filter bubble, it seems likely that she, and hopefully the Dems too, cannot resist doubling down on identity politics, with whites as the bogey man. Being whites themselves, they see being ostentatiously anti white as a status symbol. They are running some weird combination of primate dominance display, combined with a bird of paradise like virtue signal. No doubt Jordan Peterson could wax lyrical on what's going on.

    They seem not to understand cause and effect....of karma. Identity politics begets identity politics and whites are, ever so gently for now, starting to play. The Dems themselves have and still are strategically facilitating the Sailer strategy. Many of us badwhites think this is wonderful, it's certainly entertaining.

    Steve Bannon points out that many of the brighter pinkoes know this doubling down on identity politics is an error. But it seems likely that the identity politics push has gotten an unstoppable momentum of its own. Hopefully they will pick another POC as their next leader, here's hoping for Kamala Harris.

    The Bannon interview was fun to watch. I wish they'd just played the full thing without editing. I guess that's too much to expect.

    Steve Bannon is right to say Hillary’s not very bright about national politics but she’s a genius at the level of social politics. At the matriarchal game she’s unmatched. She stood by wayward Bill because she saw the long game, she got her plain daughter married off well and her Clinton Foundation is a comfortable little nest egg by even Saudi standards. She’s even a bit of a living martyr at the hands of mean White men. That last bit is the cherry on top of the White lady masterpiece that is her life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I'm not certain Hillary's so good at the matriarchial thing. Cheating Bill has humiliated her multiple times in public and made her eat dirt. The plain daughter now has a crook father-in-law, a bankrupt mother-in-law, and a hubby whose hedge fund keeps losing astonishing sums of money through sheer ineptitude. As for the Clinton foundation, the strong arm of the law has been nibbling at it for some time, and under Trump things may very well shift into gear for a full investigation. Hillary's emails have been coming under closer scrutiny because of the moronic antics of her sycophants, namely Comey and Wasserman-Schultz, so I don't think Hillary will escape in the long run. If she, or Chelsea makes signs that they're going to run for office in the future, a Republican Jusice Department is going to go after the Clinton Foundation. As for their money, I think it's likely that most it will be reduced to nothing within 20 years. The Clintons are massive spendthrifts, and once it's in the hands Chelsea and her boneheaded husband, it will disappear.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    You left out:

    Air
    Dirt
    The Stars
    G-d
    The Universe And All It Contains

    How about you take credit for what Blacks have REALLY invented?

    Crack
    The Destruction Of Cities
    High Crime
    Welfare Queens
    Polar Bear Hunting

    On the plus side I’ll give you Jazz, but not much else.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  165. @biz
    Or maybe because Germany surrendered and Japan didn't?

    Kabuki theatre, was it? Akin to the staged moon-landing and the pretense the Earth is not flat…?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous
    Do you know what role might Einstein's ideas may have played in the ongoing march toward multiculturalism and open borders? According to a write-up on him on the American Museum of Natural History website:

    Einstein's passionate commitment to the cause of global peace led him to support the creation of a single, unified world government. Einstein thought that patriotic zeal often became an excuse for violence: "As a citizen of Germany," he wrote in 1947, "I saw how excessive nationalism can spread like a disease, bringing tragedy to millions." To combat this "disease," Einstein wanted to eliminate nationalistic sentiments—first by erasing the political borders between countries and then by instituting an international government with sovereignty over individual states. During World War I, Einstein supported the formation of the "United States of Europe." He later endorsed the League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations. But Einstein worried that the United Nations did not have enough authority to ensure world peace.

    Einstein himself seemed to have little regard for national boundaries. His true allegiance was simply to the human race: "I am by heritage a Jew, by citizenship a Swiss, and by makeup a human being, and only a human being, without any special attachment to any state or national entity whatsoever."

    Einstein considered himself a citizen of the world. He lived in several European countries before moving to the United States, and he also traveled extensively, visiting countries including Palestine, Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. In 1922, Einstein and his wife Elsa boarded the S.S. Kitano Maru bound for Japan. The trip also took them to other ports including Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shanghai.

    What's somewhat interesting about this view he had of himself is that it fits so neatly with the stereotype - for good or for bad - of the rootless, cosmopolitan Jew. However, this bouncing around from countr to country is not the typical experience for most people. Did he not realize that what was good for him would be seen as a negative by most people?

    Einstein moved to the United States in 1933, after fleeing Nazi Germany. At the time he commented, "As long as I have any choice in the matter, I will live only in a country where civil liberty, tolerance, and equality of all citizens before the law are the rule." He became an American citizen seven years later.

    Einstein saw world government as the only way to ensure lasting world peace. But he was skeptical that an organization like the United Nations—which answered to the national governments of its member states—could prevent future wars. In Einstein's view, world peace would be guaranteed only when the leaders of individual nations answered to a single, supranational government.

    Is multiculturalism and open borders being done with the goal of world peace?

    Do you know what role might Einstein’s ideas may have played in the ongoing march toward multiculturalism and open borders?

    Little to none. Einstein was considered to be a brilliant scientist but a sort of “absent minded professor” who would sometimes forget to wear socks, so no one took his political musings seriously.

    As you say, most people are nationalists to one degree or another and don’t like the idea of being unattached to any country. You could see though how, for a Jew of Einstein’s generation, seeing what Hitler did with German nationalism might sour you on the idea of nationalism altogether. While it is not practical or wise to move millions upon billions of Asians and Africans to Europe or the US, at Einstein’s level (the level of top scientist and other super talented individuals – artists, athletes, etc.) Einstein’s vision is in fact correct as a practical matter and Einstein was only giving voice to what the actual reality is today and even in Einstein’s time, where great talent flows to where it is most appreciated and most highly compensated. The great failure of our era is not that Einsteins consider themselves world citizens but that we are unable (or unwilling) to distinguish clock boys from Einsteins.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    A highly intelligent person, and certainly someone who is sometimes considered to be the world's most intelligent person, should be able to anticipate that something that might work for him and others like him, might not work for the majority of people.
    , @Harry Baldwin
    I know a guy who knew a guy who worked in the same department as Einstein at Princeton. Guy #1 asked guy #2 if, in the course of his ccasional encounters with Einstein, he had ever heard him say something insightful or otherwise memorable. Guy #2 thought a moment and said, "He once told me that regular soap works just as well as shaving soap for shaving."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. @Cagey Beast
    White women consider White men their men and the global village to be their village.

    We all naturally think at the social scale of the village but this is doubly true for women. White women don't really care what the Arab, African or Chinese families in the global village do; they care about policing, shaming and (hopefully) uplifting their own children and men. Saudis and Chinese can publicly execute prisoners 'till the cows come home and White ladies will barely wrinkle their little noses but if "that man!" Putin takes his shirt off while fishing then their whole day is ruined. Putin is sort of the brother-in-law of Hillary's cousin in the global village and so it's her job to shame and police him. "I don't care what the Arabs do! In this family we're nice to gays!".

    This White lady world-view is fine and dandy at the level of the literal village but will be the death of us at the level of the mythical global village. Hillary Clinton, Madeline Albright and Samantha Power are the bossy Lady Bountifuls from the manor going around town shaming "their" men and uplifting the poor. Long story short, this is why we need to keep our ladies out of high level politics until they have the friend and enemy distinctions made perfectly clear to them.

    Long story short, this is why we need to keep our ladies out of high level politics until they have the friend and enemy distinctions made perfectly clear to them .

    There, Fixed It For You, as those people on the internet like to say.

    Read More
    • Agree: Autochthon
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Jack D says:
    @AB-
    Jack D; THREE identical posts??

    With a trembling finger/hand like that, you should get to a doctor and see if it's Parkinson's....having trouble with the TV remote or phone dialing?

    A former girlfriend used to send multiple copies of the same email. She got upset when I called them Parkinsonian.

    I have the hands of a surgeon but Bill Gates is in charge of my computer and Comcast is in charge of my internet connection, so I blame one or both of them.

    Read More
    • LOL: res
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jack D
    Einstein was in fact a pacifist. The only reason he signed the famous letter to Roosevelt which got the ball rolling on the Manhattan Project was that his fellow emigres were able to convince him that the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and it would be very bad for Hitler to get atomic weapons first. The 2nd half of that is true, but it turns out that the Germans for whatever reason did not get very far on nuclear weapons.

    "Whatever reason" might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.

    “Whatever reason” might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.

    They didn’t and it wasn’t. Nobody outside of a handful of old and ambitious regime-aligned physicists, such as Stark and Lenard, believed all that crap about “jewish physics”. Germany didn’t lack for scientific and technical talent, even considering the exodus of physicists in the 30s. What they lacked was the material capability. Fighting a war on 1 1/2 – 2 fronts, and occupying most of Europe, and only being a nation of about 90 million (including Austria, and various other german enclaves), they just didn’t have the wherewithal for such a massive undertaking. Especially as they were already engaged in another massive weapons program (which, as it happened, had no real military value) – the development of ballistic missiles. Heisenberg and others had concluded early on in the War that developing a nuclear weapon (if it were possible at all) could never be accomplished in time to have any impact on the outcome of the War. I believe they thought that applied to us too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D

    I believe they thought that applied to us too.
     
    They were right in the European theater - the American bomb came too late to affect the war in Europe. Although I am not sure that Berlin and Hamburg would have looked that much worse if they had been nuked instead of relentlessly bombed.

    It's true that the Germans chose to concentrate their efforts on the ballistic missile rather than the nuclear warhead and that their resources were not unlimited, but still I think that the exodus of Jewish scientists and the ill repute of "Jewish physics" had more of an impact than you admit. By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front. Out of 26 German nuclear physicists cited in the literature before 1933, 50% emigrated. The ones that stayed - Diebner, Esau, Gerlach, Schumann, etc. - were not exactly the #1 names in 20th century nuclear physics - they were definitely the "B" team. Deutsche Physik hacks were given undue promotions and Heisenberg only survived because his ma was friends with Himmler's ma.

    This wiki is I think a fair treatment and points to the exodus of scientific talent as an important if not the only factor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nuclear_weapon_project

    It might have been that they wouldn't have achieved nuclear weapons anyway, but losing their best scientists sure didn't help. Many of the guys that they lost ended up being key players in the American effort so it was a double hit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. Tiny Duck says:
    @JW Bell
    Those are photos of a high school youth program, http://www.lapdcadets.com

    THIS is what America looks like

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. Mr. Anon says:
    @Joe Sweet
    along those same lines...Here's George Clooney defending his current movie at the SWPL Olympiad known as the Toronto International Film Festival against charges of tone-deaf portrayal of blacks (and other race issues in Hollywood).

    http://www.indiewire.com/2017/09/george-clooney-interview-suburbicon-diversity-hollywood-1201874750/


    “Of course, Charlottesville happens, because every few years Charlottesville happens again,” he said. “We keep forgetting that we haven’t excised that original sin completely. When I was growing up in Kentucky, the civil-rights movement had its big wave and segregation was exorcised from this country. We really felt like we were on this trajectory toward it all being finished. It wasn’t something you thought would be around. It’s a surprise that it’s still a part of our world.”

    As a filmmaker, Clooney said it took years for him to tackle race because he had yet to find the right project. “A lot of people ask me why I haven’t done any movies about Darfur or South Sudan,” he said, recalling his advocacy in the region. “Well, I haven’t found the script that’s right to do it. My personal life and where I go — philanthropic things — have always been toward whatever is inclusive, not exclusive. That’s always been an important part of my life. It’s just hard to find those films.”

    But Clooney added that he would rather see more minority filmmakers work their way into the industry, echoing the rise of Mexican filmmakers in Hollywood over a decade ago —the so-called “Three Amigos” of Alfonso Cuaron, Alejandro Gonzalez Iñarritu, and Guillermo del Toro, whose “The Shape of Water” just won the Golden Lion at the Venice International Film Festival.

    “All these great Mexican filmmakers showed up, it was like, fuck, this is great filmmaking,” Clooney said. “That’s what I’d like to see… some really interesting young filmmakers out there. You want to feel something fresh and new constantly. You want people pushing the limits. There’s a way to make things much cheaper now so there are a lot of different voices out there.”
     

    What a nitwit. He apparently thinks because these three Mexican directors have names similar to the guys who do the yard work at his LA mansion that they look like his gardeners too. There's nothing "minority" about those three amigos unless you are taking the global view and are recognizing that whites are a minority.

    http://www.trbimg.com/img-54e7f3ee/turbine/la-apphoto-fox-s-golden-globe-awards-party1-jpg-20150220/1150/1150x647

    Of course, famous actor and hypocrite George Clooney recently fled Europe because of diversity:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/07/06/clooney-moving-twins-back-america-security-reasons/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Mr. Anon says:

    I think the term that Hillary is looking for is “F**king White Male”, as made famous by

    Carl the Cuck and AIDS Skrillex

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  173. Jack D says:
    @Maj. Kong
    I'm old enough to recall the "epistemic closure" meme that was spread after the 2012 defeat. The most disgusting thing the left did in 2012 was the "White People mourning Romney" Tumblrism. Their reveling in open anti-white racism (thinking an amnesty and permanent one party rule was right around the corner). That's what sent me out of mainstream WF Buckley conservatism, and into White Identity Politics.

    You could say that declaring victory prematurely is a common failure of the Left, but you have to understand that the reason that they do it is that they see themselves as being on “the right side of history” and that so often their declarations of victory succeed in creating facts on the ground.

    This usually works (see gay marriage), and usually they are able to suppress any visible white/traditionalist backlash – anyone who protests at being placed upon the garbage heap of history is declared to be a Nazi and doxxed. Unfortunately for Hillary we still have the secret ballot though I predict that Leftists will go after that soon. Aren’t we entitled to know how you voted so we can know not to hire you? Why should fascists be allowed to hide their fascist beliefs behind the curtain of the voting booth?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kevin C.

    Unfortunately for Hillary we still have the secret ballot though I predict that Leftists will go after that soon. Aren’t we entitled to know how you voted so we can know not to hire you? Why should fascists be allowed to hide their fascist beliefs behind the curtain of the voting booth?
     
    Didn't we already see the start of this with the purging of Brendan Eich for his Prop. 8 vote?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. I am tremendously saddened to see my beloved country splitting into two warring camps. I weep and cry for my nation. What can I do to bring peace and unity to America?

    My whole spirit is in torment at the prospect that a terrible tumult will trample the United States. I sense great global political shockwaves reverberating from the coming conflict in the United States.

    As I write this I see with patriotic clarity the two camps beginning their mobilization for total war.
    The first camp consists of people who consider Hillary Clinton to be a “screeching harridan” and the second camp is composed of those who insist with a vigorous warlike fury that Hillary Clinton is a “haranguing harpy.”

    There will be no peace between the two views of Hillary Clinton until one side is completely and totally vanquished. Only God will prevent the war between the two camps.

    Please, God, let the cooler heads prevail so as to preserve the peace in this troubled land.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  175. NickG says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview,
     
    I'm glad somebody brought up this interview, because I need to unburden myself of a most disquieting sensation. I feel like I'm in The Twilight Zone whenever I hear people on our side talk about how wonderful that interview was, as if one morning I woke up the same and everybody else was different.

    A word to the wise here---that interview was atrocious. Steve Bannon comes across as an unhinged zealot: Bloodshot eyes, interruptive speech, delusions of grandeur. He seems to think he's still playing some sort of vital role within the Trump administration, although paradoxically from "outside" it. The fact of the matter, as is becoming quite clear, is just the opposite. Bannon was apparently always a marginal figure in Trump's circle and with Trump's increasingly establishment drift, there is no longer any use for him. This must have come as a blow to Bannon's ego. He once thought (and had many others thinking) that he was the indispensable architect of the victorious Trump movement. That idea has turned out to be largely a myth created by himself.

    In compensation, Bannon has taken to running Breitbart as if it were his own personal vanity site. The features now consist of basically two kinds: 1) Articles about Steve Bannon; and 2) Articles about articles about Steve Bannon. This is is recurring theme with Breitbart and is reminiscent of the turbo-gonzo days of Milo Yiannopoulos.

    What's worse is the actual content of Steve Bannon's vision for the country. He styles himself as a defender of "radical unity," meaning that Americans of every race, religion, and sexual orientation will find common cause in his program of economic nationalism.

    It is impossible to overstate how stupid that is. Replace economic nationalism with "muh free market" and there is nothing to distinguish this from the cuckservativism of DR3 and "enterprise zones," except that Bannon's version lacks the gibs and graft necessary to actually make the spoils system work.

    Steve Bannon is an epic failure as a statesman. Whether its his grandiose but inaccurate historiographies ("Firing James Comey was the worst mistake in modern political history") or his cowardly hypocrisy ("We committed the original sin of the Trump administration; we embraced the establishment"), he is an unstable, self-promoting, and self-aggrandizing lunatic who has no place anywhere near the corridors of power.

    Steve Bannon comes across as an unhinged zealot:

    Yup, to many that would never going to vote Trump. But then few normal – non political junkie – folks, especially swing voters, know who Bannon is!

    Steve Bannon is an epic failure as a statesman

    Yup I agree, and in the same vein our host here would be an epic failure transitioning to a career as a female ramp model. I suspect both Steve’s share similar levels of expectation of success in each respective profession. Bannon was a behind the scenes geezer; he was never on the cards as a ‘statesman’.

    Bannon is, no doubt, a pugnacious bombastic geezer. What his contribution to Trump’s ideological underpinnings, or the campaign’s against the odds success, is difficult to say on the level of the inside gen most of us here have. What we can say is that Bannon was billed as Trump’s Campaign co-ordinator and contrary to most predictions, Trump won.

    Was he fired, was he pushed, did he flounce off, does he feel he can be more effective outside the administration….I suspect it’s something of all 4. Does he still have Trump’s ear…I suspect not directly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    "our host here would be an epic failure transitioning to a career as a female ramp model"

    He would, because unfortunately he looks like a grown man instead of a pubescent boy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. Jack D says:
    @black sea
    Bill was, as you may remember, our first African-American president, and Hillary is deluded enough to imagine this affords her some honorary POC status, notwithstanding the fact someone like Sarah Palin is, by comparison to her, practically an indigene.

    See for example Hillary speaking in black dialect:

    If Romney tried something like this it would be horrible, racist cultural appropriation and lightning bolts would descend from the heavens and strike him down for such a sin, but Hillary, as the spouse of an honorary black man can get away with this (although I am sure that it did not really endear her to black people – she is not really an endearing person, period). A lot of what white liberals do is not actually intended to appeal to blacks (who are loyal Democrat voters for so long as the food stamps flow) but to nice white liberal ladies who imagine that this is what blacks like.

    Read More
    • Replies: @black sea
    I guess she believes the bottle of pepper sauce she (allegedly) carries in her purse really seals the deal with the bruthas and sistahs.

    And to think this clueless clown still can't figure out why she keeps losing.

    , @IBC
    Romney was accused of tanning specifically to increase his appeal to Latino voters:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/20/mitt-romney-dyed-face-brown-fake-tan-univision_n_1900707.html

    Maybe Hillary was trying to pass herself off as some kind of white yokel from Arkansas instead of an authoritarian-sounding northern white feminist lawyer-type? If a traditional black American audience could be assured that a white person is not actually racist or putting on any kind of airs with them, they might otherwise be expected to make more of a personal connection with a white Southerner over a Northerner as happened with her husband, Bill.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. @AndrewR
    I don't feel like digging too deeply into Che's ancestry or into the genetic studies of the Irish and Spanish people, but there is an interesting genetic link between part of the Irish population and part of the Spanish population.

    The Galicians of Northern Spain are Celtic just like the Irish, Scots, and Welsh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. Olorin says:
    @Broski
    The dynamic underlying this chart is human labor being replaced by machines. That, along with global Europa realizing that diversity sucks, will drive History (in the Fukuyama sense) during the 21st century.

    Wrong.

    The underlying dynamic here is that in the 1960s Art Sackler brought Valium’s patent to the US from the company where his wife worked then became the first ad man in history to rack up $100 million in pharmaceutical sales for a single product.

    He’s in the medical advertising hall of fame for that, speaking of monuments that should be torn down.

    http://theweek.com/articles/541564/how-american-opiate-epidemic-started-by-pharmaceutical-company

    He achieved this magnificent accomplishment by turning family doctors into pushers.

    The families were white. The doctors were white. The affected population was white.

    Read the above link. Read it. Read it again. The “whites depressed because of machines” meme is a lie and a distraction. It is deliberate. Don’t let yourself be cucked by it. And don’t try to cuck others with it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. @Anonymous
    Do you know what role might Einstein's ideas may have played in the ongoing march toward multiculturalism and open borders? According to a write-up on him on the American Museum of Natural History website:

    Einstein's passionate commitment to the cause of global peace led him to support the creation of a single, unified world government. Einstein thought that patriotic zeal often became an excuse for violence: "As a citizen of Germany," he wrote in 1947, "I saw how excessive nationalism can spread like a disease, bringing tragedy to millions." To combat this "disease," Einstein wanted to eliminate nationalistic sentiments—first by erasing the political borders between countries and then by instituting an international government with sovereignty over individual states. During World War I, Einstein supported the formation of the "United States of Europe." He later endorsed the League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations. But Einstein worried that the United Nations did not have enough authority to ensure world peace.

    Einstein himself seemed to have little regard for national boundaries. His true allegiance was simply to the human race: "I am by heritage a Jew, by citizenship a Swiss, and by makeup a human being, and only a human being, without any special attachment to any state or national entity whatsoever."

    Einstein considered himself a citizen of the world. He lived in several European countries before moving to the United States, and he also traveled extensively, visiting countries including Palestine, Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. In 1922, Einstein and his wife Elsa boarded the S.S. Kitano Maru bound for Japan. The trip also took them to other ports including Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shanghai.

    What's somewhat interesting about this view he had of himself is that it fits so neatly with the stereotype - for good or for bad - of the rootless, cosmopolitan Jew. However, this bouncing around from countr to country is not the typical experience for most people. Did he not realize that what was good for him would be seen as a negative by most people?

    Einstein moved to the United States in 1933, after fleeing Nazi Germany. At the time he commented, "As long as I have any choice in the matter, I will live only in a country where civil liberty, tolerance, and equality of all citizens before the law are the rule." He became an American citizen seven years later.

    Einstein saw world government as the only way to ensure lasting world peace. But he was skeptical that an organization like the United Nations—which answered to the national governments of its member states—could prevent future wars. In Einstein's view, world peace would be guaranteed only when the leaders of individual nations answered to a single, supranational government.

    Is multiculturalism and open borders being done with the goal of world peace?

    Einstein thought highly of Lenin, saying: “I honor Lenin as a man who completely sacrificed himself and devoted all his energy to the realization of social justice. I do not consider his methods practical, but one thing is certain: men of his type are the guardians and restorers of humanity.”

    (wikipedia)

    Yeah, Einstein was a red (useful idiot to be precise). He isn’t the cause of those opinions; he was just reiterating beliefs that were popular among the intellectual classes at the time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. Rod1963 says:
    @Arclight
    Yeah - if the GOP was smart, they could continue to win the presidency just due to the erosion of white support for the Democrats alone. Even smarter would be to adopt the strategy Sailer has put forth of encouraging the perception of the Dems as a party primarily concerned with black Americans and force Hispanic voters to choose between that and the GOP as an alternative. You need a Rove or a Stone for that, and frankly the GOP doesn't really have a master political architect right now, but neither do the Dems.

    The GOP just wants Trump gone, period.

    The fact is the GOP has never liked the white blue collar or middle-class people at all. They just happened to throw them a bone once in a while but that’s it. It’s a country club for upper class professionals and grifters.

    Take a look at their economic policies since GHW Bush – screw the little guy and cater to the wealthy, support globalization and off-shoring of industry and keep the borders open.

    As a party they didn’t like outsiders like Reagan or Trump anymore than the DNC liked Carter(they hated him as much as the GOP hates Trump). It’s a culture thing. Reagan and Trump were mainstream Americans in terms of thinking and values. They never fit in the hallowed halls of the Hamptons or Greenwich.

    And they are quite content on committing political suicide to get rid of Trump because they don’t care if they end up a permanent rump party as long as they get payolla.

    In short don’t view them as Americans because they are not, they are merely self-serving swindlers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D

    Do you know what role might Einstein’s ideas may have played in the ongoing march toward multiculturalism and open borders?
     
    Little to none. Einstein was considered to be a brilliant scientist but a sort of "absent minded professor" who would sometimes forget to wear socks, so no one took his political musings seriously.

    As you say, most people are nationalists to one degree or another and don't like the idea of being unattached to any country. You could see though how, for a Jew of Einstein's generation, seeing what Hitler did with German nationalism might sour you on the idea of nationalism altogether. While it is not practical or wise to move millions upon billions of Asians and Africans to Europe or the US, at Einstein's level (the level of top scientist and other super talented individuals - artists, athletes, etc.) Einstein's vision is in fact correct as a practical matter and Einstein was only giving voice to what the actual reality is today and even in Einstein's time, where great talent flows to where it is most appreciated and most highly compensated. The great failure of our era is not that Einsteins consider themselves world citizens but that we are unable (or unwilling) to distinguish clock boys from Einsteins.

    A highly intelligent person, and certainly someone who is sometimes considered to be the world’s most intelligent person, should be able to anticipate that something that might work for him and others like him, might not work for the majority of people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    If you consider the millions upon millions of dead as a result of the two 20th century world wars, you might wonder if nationalism really "worked" for the average European either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. White Core Americans(WCAs) seems to be a good descriptive name designed to get the most bang for the buck in terms of triggering the anti-White totalitarians who control the Democrat Party. Hillary Clinton seems to snarl like an angry dog when she says the word “White.” I liked to use the descriptive name “European Christian Ancestral Core” but that does seem too wordy and it ain’t got the magic word “White” that drives them wild.

    White Core Americans can be said to describe the ethnic or ancestral core population of the United States. The ancestral core of the United States is White. The United States is a White nation. Hillary Clinton says she loves Blacks but Hillary loves to live in the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York.

    Speech sample using White Core America as a theme:

    Mass immigration has been used as a demographic weapon to demographically attack White Core Americans. The Democrat Party is using the mass importation of foreigners as a demographic weapon to attack White Core Americans. Now is the time to vote for a candidate who will defend the interests of White Core Americans against the evil attacks of the Democrat Party. Vote for your future, vote for your families future, vote to defend and protect the proud patriotic core of this great country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  183. Pat Boyle says:
    @Peter Akuleyev
    The elites seem completely unaware how grating their usage of "white" is. It shows how deeply trapped they are in their own little bubble.

    I think all this naked hatred against whites is a big mistake for blacks. East Asians with some justice feel they are equal or superior so you don’t get much contempt for white accomplishment from them. Hispanics want the goose that lays those golden eggs so they too are circumspect. But Americans blacks no longer bother too conceal their desire to slaughter all whites.

    Let’s face it blacks have not worked out in America. Lincoln, Jefferson and Washington never could believe that blacks could ever be social equals to whites. As it turns out – they were right.

    Since the sixties America has embraced a kind of optimism about prospects for racial blending. But all the evidence for the success of racial equality is negative.

    There is a story earlier in this blog thread about America’s opioid epidemic. It testifies to the hopelessness that young black men feel. I’m sure its correct. Probably the best way to interpret the black on black shooting that we see in Baltimore, Detroit and Chicago is that it is a new form of suicide – suicide by proxy. The social scientists refuse to believe it but the black kids in the ghetto know the odds against them ever becoming a normal member of society. So they shoot heroin into their arms and shoot their gun at other blacks.

    Meanwhile the white liberals and black militants become increasingly more strident. They have grants and maybe even tenure. They are a long way from the grim realities of street black life. So they indulge in nasty panegyrics against white people. They feel better for this. Most other blacks have no outlet for their frustration. They at least can scream.

    But hating whites is not cost-free. We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people. We know that the famous Nazi genocide of the Jews was done by white people. So no should doubt that whites can be very nasty indeed. It is in the best long term interest of blacks to cool it – to mollify whites and hope for some answer to emerge. The present course of white liberals and black radicals to spew undiluted hatred at whites looks to me to be another suicide gesture.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Olorin

    I think all this naked hatred against whites is a big mistake for blacks.
     
    Exactly correct.

    And who do you think taught them to act like this starting in the 1960s?

    And what do you think their motives were?

    If blacks ever wake up to how they have been used, and how badly, in the name of "civil" "rights," there is going to be a reckoning...and suddenly the cry is going to be, "Help us, white man! Call the police/National Guard/Army/Navy/Coast Guard to save us!"

    Or so I'm told by conservative Jews of my acquaintance.

    We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people.
     
    You mean the guys who flew Enola Gay? No doubt. Most pilots and plane crews in the 1940s US were.

    What about the people who created the device/processes leading up to it in the Manhattan (ahem) Project?

    What about J. Robert Oppenheimer, Frank Oppenheimer, Albert Einstein, Neils Bohr, Leo Szilard, Nicholas Kurti, David Bohm, Rudolf Peierls, Felix Bloch, Paul Wigner, James Chadwick, James Franck, Otto Frisch, Edward Teller, Hans Bethe, Klaus Fuchs, Dick Feynmann, Louis Slotin, Louis Rosen, Morris Kolodney, Ted Hall, Samuel Cohen, Jacob Beser, Samuel Goldsmit, George Placzek, Eugene Rabinowich, Gregory Breit, David Greenglass, Victor Weisskopf, Alvin Weinberg, Isidor Rabi, Joseph Rotblat, George Koval, Stan Frankel, Franz Simon, and David Lilienthal?

    Were they "white people"?

    Were they "white people" when they worked for Hitler?

    Were they "white people" when they spied for Stalin?
    , @Thea
    Do Mestizos possess the same racial animus?


    I'm sure they'd fleece us but there doesn't seem to be the same desire to spitefully rape, torture and kill us. Perhaps I'm wrong.

    , @anonymous

    So no should doubt that whites can be very nasty indeed.
     
    Oh man, no one with a thinking brain doubts that. We see it exhibited in its full glory, every day, in some corner of the world.
    , @Tacitus
    We also know that White South Africans are demonstrating that Whites are quite willing to give up power and allow themselves to be victims of genocide. Pioneers.
    , @Logan
    In case you hadn't heard, poor whites are heavily afflicted by the opioid disaster.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D
    Here is a picture of young Che (left) with his family - they look pretty "white bread" to me:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Chefamily.jpg

    In accordance with Spanish naming customs (father's name then mother's) his father was named
    Ernesto Guevara y Lynch - in other words Che was a "Lynch" thru his paternal grandmother. It's unclear (at least to me) how long the Lynches resided in Argentina - some sources trace him to Patrick (Patricio) Lynch who arrived in Argentina in the 18th century while others point to more recent ancestry.

    By appearance the Guevaras didn't have a lot of Irish in them and I am guessing were mostly Spanish (but very little if any Amerindian). The Argentine lower classes all identify as "Spanish" but in fact, especially once you get outside of Buenos Aires, have a great deal of Indian blood (which they pretend not to notice), but the upper classes (like Che) tend to be mostly or all European (albeit Southern European ).

    They don’t look “white bread”. The connotation of “white bread” is WASPY/northern European looking, rather than white or European in general. The Jersey Shore for example would be white but not “white bread”. This is why the actor Maroulis says he’s not “Wonder Bread”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. Olorin says:
    @Tiny Duck
    Because whites have unearned privileges that are greater than their contributions

    Leonard Pitts and verysmartbrothas have written extensively on how white men continue to murder People of Color. Complaining about "anti white" stuff contributes to white supremacy. You guys are traitors tearforists and fake Americans. America is about freedom justice and the fight against racism

    You people need to get out. America does not want or need you

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color

    Also white wonen are increasingly bearing Children of Color. I cannot wait for just stick to be served

    OK OK OK then.

    I asked for a higher quality troll, I was told we can’t afford it, being a sort of tincup-for-existence samizdat endeavor.

    So can we at LEAST take up a collection to send Dicky Nut to SKDKnickerbocker’s summer camp for PR interns?

    Or maybe they’re already sending their best. Hm.

    I demand more Edge from our resident troll!

    More wit! More…Andrew Anglin and less Andrew Cuomo! More Adrean Arlott and less Adrienne Arsineault! More Nick Bougas and less Nick Kristof!

    Dammit, I came of age on PJ O’Rourke in Ma Poon and manuscripts of The Boomer Bible (not published in book form till 1990 iirc)!

    http://johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/Culture/Extras/foreigners.html

    http://theboomerbible.com/

    I demand better Troll!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @grapesoda
    Because it's ESPN. They've been going full SJW for years now, in spite of tanking ratings and financial difficulties.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-28/espn-can-t-afford-to-go-on-like-this

    http://www.businessinsider.com/espns-layoffs-spell-trouble-for-live-sports-2017-3

    They also had a "groundbreaking" female-only announcing crew for the Monday night game, which all non-SJWs thought was terrible.

    ESPN is the Democratic Party of cable channels, ie too arrogant to try to correct their mistakes.

    They also had a “groundbreaking” female-only announcing crew for the Monday night game, which all non-SJWs thought was terrible.

    Wait – is Rex Ryan transitioning?? This stuff really is contagious!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “Putin’s Russianness may be a good template for American Whiteness.”

    It was…in the 1980s. But we are way past the point where that could be viable here in the United States. The Russian population is not growing dramatically via immigration. The US population is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sarah Toga
    therefore . . . end immigration.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “we still have the secret ballot though I predict that Leftists will go after that soon.”

    They have already tested the waters with that by attempting to remove secret ballots for union leadership voting.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  189. @AndrewR
    Anti-white rhetoric in general seemed to skyrocket around 2012.

    When Obama was reelected in 2012, left-liberals figured it was time (and safe) to drop the mask of affability and give vent to their venomous hatred.

    Read More
    • Agree: AndrewR
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. Dube says:
    @map
    "White" as an epithet is a function of liberals not believing in truth, yet having to still be convincing to people. When one does not believe in truth, then the only way to be convincing is to make arguments "against interest." Hillary perceives that being anti-white will endear her to others because she thinks she will be convincing by attacking herself or arguing against her own perceived interest. We're supposed to be so impressed by these self-criticizing acts, that we immediately fall to our knees to worship these "leaders."

    I'd be more impressed if these self-criticizers simply offed themselves.

    “map,” thanks for what seems a fruitful analysis.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. Russ says:
    @NickG
    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview, said that Hillary is not very bright. I think he is right.

    Combine this with her being in a filter bubble, it seems likely that she, and hopefully the Dems too, cannot resist doubling down on identity politics, with whites as the bogey man. Being whites themselves, they see being ostentatiously anti white as a status symbol. They are running some weird combination of primate dominance display, combined with a bird of paradise like virtue signal. No doubt Jordan Peterson could wax lyrical on what's going on.

    They seem not to understand cause and effect....of karma. Identity politics begets identity politics and whites are, ever so gently for now, starting to play. The Dems themselves have and still are strategically facilitating the Sailer strategy. Many of us badwhites think this is wonderful, it's certainly entertaining.

    Steve Bannon points out that many of the brighter pinkoes know this doubling down on identity politics is an error. But it seems likely that the identity politics push has gotten an unstoppable momentum of its own. Hopefully they will pick another POC as their next leader, here's hoping for Kamala Harris.

    The Bannon interview was fun to watch. I wish they'd just played the full thing without editing. I guess that's too much to expect.

    Loved your point about wanting to see the unexpurgated Bannon interview.

    The very first issue of Playboy I ever read was from 1990 or so. Its feature interview was of Donald Trump. Trump also had his own camera crew tape the interview. Wish Bannon had done likewise with 60 Minutes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. black sea says:
    @Jack D
    See for example Hillary speaking in black dialect:

    https://youtu.be/6FlpbRFXC9E?t=14

    If Romney tried something like this it would be horrible, racist cultural appropriation and lightning bolts would descend from the heavens and strike him down for such a sin, but Hillary, as the spouse of an honorary black man can get away with this (although I am sure that it did not really endear her to black people - she is not really an endearing person, period). A lot of what white liberals do is not actually intended to appeal to blacks (who are loyal Democrat voters for so long as the food stamps flow) but to nice white liberal ladies who imagine that this is what blacks like.

    I guess she believes the bottle of pepper sauce she (allegedly) carries in her purse really seals the deal with the bruthas and sistahs.

    And to think this clueless clown still can’t figure out why she keeps losing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    I guess she believes the bottle of pepper sauce she (allegedly) carries in her purse really seals the deal with the bruthas and sistahs.
     
    It's more likely actually a can of pepper-spray.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. Russ says:
    @Anonymous
    Did you see Sergio Dipp's ESPN sideline report from Monday Night Football? I didn't either because I no longer watch the NFL. But anyway, Sergio (who was born in Mexicali, Mexico and attended the University of Monterrey, where he studied communications) highlighted the black coach's diversity and went into an embarrassing commentary.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQoB2flGBa4

    Don’t know how Sergio was worse – in the brazen pandering to the SJWs, or in a performance that was worse than amateurish by any objective standards.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    In this case, she’s not using it because it’s just a general negative intensifier. She’s using it because she’s playing to domestic politics, and on the domestic political scene, Putin has been explicitly embraced as a “white authoritarian leader” of sorts by white nationalists, regardless of what Putin himself really is.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/richard-spencer-trump-alt-right-white-nationalist/

    Spencer calls Russia “the most powerful white power in the world” and admires Vladimir Putin’s authoritarianism—he would gladly admit most Russians into his ideal ethnostate.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/page/ct-trump-putin-russia-perspec-0517-20170516-story.html

    Rising self-described white nationalist Matthew Heimbach also has praised Putin’s Russia as “the axis for nationalists,” according to an interview by Business Insider. “I really believe that Russia is the leader of the free world right now,” he told the news website. “Putin is supporting nationalists around the world and building an anti-globalist alliance, while promoting traditional values and self-determination.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    I honestly don't understand why the Western right keeps falling for these guys (their last love affair was with Hitler - that didn't turn out well either). Yes, they hate the decadent West and you hate the decadent West, but that doesn't mean that they are your friends.

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play. Americans , no matter how rightist, would never allow themselves to be ruled by a Putin.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn't give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties - his #1 loyalty is to himself and his family, then to his inner circle, then to the Russian people and YOU are way,way outside the circle of trust.
    , @Thea
    i wonder if Putin's American fan club is of any use to him or if they are viewed as either crazy or irrelevant
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. Dennis Dale says: • Website

    Putin doesn’t give a damn about “white identity”, he is a statist

    This is beyond irrelevant.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    No, it is highly relevant. Russian, even today's rump Russia, is a multicultural society where you can be "Russian" by signing on to the great Russian statist project. Russia (and Putin is very typical in this regard) defines itself in OPPOSITION to the decadent West. If you are a Russian statist, you can be any culture or religion (although it certainly doesn't hurt to be Russian and Orthodox). If you oppose the Russian statist project then you are an enemy of Moscow and pure white Russian blood won't help you - watch out for Polonium in your tea.

    This article explains it:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/opinion/russia-putin-national-identity.html

    Americans always make the mistake of assuming that everyone thinks just like Americans. Putin is impossible to understand in American terms and not a good role model for American white nationalists because Russian history is not like American history and Russians are not Americans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous
    A highly intelligent person, and certainly someone who is sometimes considered to be the world's most intelligent person, should be able to anticipate that something that might work for him and others like him, might not work for the majority of people.

    If you consider the millions upon millions of dead as a result of the two 20th century world wars, you might wonder if nationalism really “worked” for the average European either.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterike

    If you consider the millions upon millions of dead as a result of the two 20th century world wars, you might wonder if nationalism really “worked” for the average European either.

     

    If you think those wars were driven by "nationalism" then you really don't know much about it.
    , @Currahee
    Hitler respected national borders?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “Einstein was in fact a pacifist.”

    …except when it came to Israel. For some mysterious reason he supported the creation of Israel using military force, though he tried to couch his hypocrisy with feigned concern about the Palestinians.

    Einstein was a pacifist because he did not truly considering himself German or American. He was a Jew first, meaning that he wasn’t particularly invested in the patriotic concerns of the nations in which he resided. If I were an American living in Japan, I would probably be a pacifist if the Chinese attacked Senkaku. What’s it to me anyway? I’m not Japanese. However, if I were an American living in America, I would feel very different if midway were attacked by the Chinese. See how that works?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  198. @Anon
    "Putin’s Russianness may be a good template for American Whiteness."

    It was...in the 1980s. But we are way past the point where that could be viable here in the United States. The Russian population is not growing dramatically via immigration. The US population is.

    therefore . . . end immigration.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “If you consider the millions upon millions of dead as a result of the two 20th century world wars, you might wonder if nationalism really “worked” for the average European either.”

    It worked for us. We stole our lands, conquered our enemies, put a man on the moon, and turned ourselves into a superpower. The only difference is that Europeans are losers who lost.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  200. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    That's the problem that the Dems are running into these days. Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslims are demanding to be front and center in the party leadership and to be the candidates. White men, Jews and white women are being pushed out.

    It was one thing having Bill Clinton or Schumer or Biden chiding whites and talking about white privilege. It's another to have Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible.

    Obama got away with it in part because of his personality (a well-spoken black who frankly didn't act like other blacks) and in part because he was the first PoC to get elected to high office. But even his racial animus came out over time, and it rubbed whites the wrong way.

    Whites won't have as much patience the next time around, nor will the PoC messenger likely be as smooth as Obama.

    It's a major problem for the Dems. Luckily for them, the GOP would rather perish than stand up for whites so the Dems will be just fine because it's hard to lose if you don't have an opponent.

    Part of the problem with Republican candidates for office is that they have had the rule of coalition building beaten into their heads, namely, he who wins is the one who puts together the biggest coalition. It’s a basic rule of warfare. They’re not used to the idea that this country is fragmenting into masses that no longer assimilate and that-old fashioned coalition building no longer works on a national level. The main problem is that the Democrats, by demonizing whites, are splintering the electorate irreparably. Republicans hate the idea that they’ll win elections by imitating George Wallace or Theodore Bilbo, and that what used to be the ideology of the old South is now white America writ large. You’ve got all these northern descendants of abolitionists and Unions soldiers who are writhing in agony at the thought of it.

    Someone made the point above is that self-hating whites like Hillary can only lead blacks and browns by being a self-hating white and buy promising to pass on a lot of free goodies, and that the minute white Democratics start losing elections anyway, blacks and browns will abandon them as candidates and create the rule that only people of color can represent them in office. That will finish off white Democrats completely. To POCs, having patronage and money being passed onto them in local politics by POC aldermen and mayors is far more important than supporting white candidates who lose elections and who fail to cough up the goodies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. @MEH 0910

    As any Person of Color will tell you white men take credit for inventing things they stole from People of Color
     
    Name some examples.

    don’t forget those flying pyramids

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. Mr. Anon says:
    @black sea
    I guess she believes the bottle of pepper sauce she (allegedly) carries in her purse really seals the deal with the bruthas and sistahs.

    And to think this clueless clown still can't figure out why she keeps losing.

    I guess she believes the bottle of pepper sauce she (allegedly) carries in her purse really seals the deal with the bruthas and sistahs.

    It’s more likely actually a can of pepper-spray.

    Read More
    • LOL: Kylie
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. Jack D says:
    @Dennis Dale

    Putin doesn’t give a damn about “white identity”, he is a statist
     
    This is beyond irrelevant.

    No, it is highly relevant. Russian, even today’s rump Russia, is a multicultural society where you can be “Russian” by signing on to the great Russian statist project. Russia (and Putin is very typical in this regard) defines itself in OPPOSITION to the decadent West. If you are a Russian statist, you can be any culture or religion (although it certainly doesn’t hurt to be Russian and Orthodox). If you oppose the Russian statist project then you are an enemy of Moscow and pure white Russian blood won’t help you – watch out for Polonium in your tea.

    This article explains it:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/opinion/russia-putin-national-identity.html

    Americans always make the mistake of assuming that everyone thinks just like Americans. Putin is impossible to understand in American terms and not a good role model for American white nationalists because Russian history is not like American history and Russians are not Americans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Vinteuil
    "Putin is impossible to understand in American terms and not a good role model for American white nationalists because Russian history is not like American history and Russians are not Americans."

    This seems right to me. The political situation in Russia is just too different from that in the USA to make any easy comparisons.

    I hope you'd agree that, just as it's foolish for American nationalists to adopt Putin as a role model, it's equally foolish - and far more dangerous, not to mention far more prevalent - for American globalists to demonize him.
    , @Vinteuil
    P.S. - I'd hope you'd also agree that Donald Trump has (or, at least, had) exactly the right instincts here: wouldn't it be great if we could just get along with Russians, and cooperate with them when it's to our mutual advantage? What possible advantage can ordinary Americans gain from a renewed cold war?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “Clooney and the Coens”

    Clooney is a loser who hasn’t been in a good movie since George W. was president – and even then only during his first term. The Coens are also overrated hacks who make artsy-fartsy movies that appeal only to other hacks who like to think of themselves as more sophisticated than the lower classes they despise. The most likely outcome of their project is that the left goes nuts as soon as the phrase “the Turner Diaries” is uttered, regardless of context (because the left is reactionary and stupid). Clooney and the Coens will try to explain their meaning (attacking whites and Trump) but it will be too late. Controversy will ensue, the ADL will publicly distance themselves from the project, and it will blow up in their faces.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  205. Olorin says:
    @Pat Boyle
    I think all this naked hatred against whites is a big mistake for blacks. East Asians with some justice feel they are equal or superior so you don't get much contempt for white accomplishment from them. Hispanics want the goose that lays those golden eggs so they too are circumspect. But Americans blacks no longer bother too conceal their desire to slaughter all whites.

    Let's face it blacks have not worked out in America. Lincoln, Jefferson and Washington never could believe that blacks could ever be social equals to whites. As it turns out - they were right.

    Since the sixties America has embraced a kind of optimism about prospects for racial blending. But all the evidence for the success of racial equality is negative.

    There is a story earlier in this blog thread about America's opioid epidemic. It testifies to the hopelessness that young black men feel. I'm sure its correct. Probably the best way to interpret the black on black shooting that we see in Baltimore, Detroit and Chicago is that it is a new form of suicide - suicide by proxy. The social scientists refuse to believe it but the black kids in the ghetto know the odds against them ever becoming a normal member of society. So they shoot heroin into their arms and shoot their gun at other blacks.

    Meanwhile the white liberals and black militants become increasingly more strident. They have grants and maybe even tenure. They are a long way from the grim realities of street black life. So they indulge in nasty panegyrics against white people. They feel better for this. Most other blacks have no outlet for their frustration. They at least can scream.

    But hating whites is not cost-free. We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people. We know that the famous Nazi genocide of the Jews was done by white people. So no should doubt that whites can be very nasty indeed. It is in the best long term interest of blacks to cool it - to mollify whites and hope for some answer to emerge. The present course of white liberals and black radicals to spew undiluted hatred at whites looks to me to be another suicide gesture.

    I think all this naked hatred against whites is a big mistake for blacks.

    Exactly correct.

    And who do you think taught them to act like this starting in the 1960s?

    And what do you think their motives were?

    If blacks ever wake up to how they have been used, and how badly, in the name of “civil” “rights,” there is going to be a reckoning…and suddenly the cry is going to be, “Help us, white man! Call the police/National Guard/Army/Navy/Coast Guard to save us!”

    Or so I’m told by conservative Jews of my acquaintance.

    We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people.

    You mean the guys who flew Enola Gay? No doubt. Most pilots and plane crews in the 1940s US were.

    What about the people who created the device/processes leading up to it in the Manhattan (ahem) Project?

    What about J. Robert Oppenheimer, Frank Oppenheimer, Albert Einstein, Neils Bohr, Leo Szilard, Nicholas Kurti, David Bohm, Rudolf Peierls, Felix Bloch, Paul Wigner, James Chadwick, James Franck, Otto Frisch, Edward Teller, Hans Bethe, Klaus Fuchs, Dick Feynmann, Louis Slotin, Louis Rosen, Morris Kolodney, Ted Hall, Samuel Cohen, Jacob Beser, Samuel Goldsmit, George Placzek, Eugene Rabinowich, Gregory Breit, David Greenglass, Victor Weisskopf, Alvin Weinberg, Isidor Rabi, Joseph Rotblat, George Koval, Stan Frankel, Franz Simon, and David Lilienthal?

    Were they “white people”?

    Were they “white people” when they worked for Hitler?

    Were they “white people” when they spied for Stalin?

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    Their intention was to drop the bomb on Nazis, which clears up the apparent contradiction right there.

    I remember reading that one of them, after the Nazis were out of the war and it was clear politicians were intent on dropping it on Japan, said something like, "My God, it's as if these people actually *want* to use the thing." Um, why did you build it for them if you didn't want to use it?

    I realize the response would be, "Because we were afraid Nazis were going to invent it without us inventing it first." Which was a reasonable fear. But come on, you wanted to drop it on Germany. Tell the truth.

    Anyway, they solved the mistake of giving Whitebread America the bomb by handing it over to the Evil Empire, which at least back in the day had a bunch of their people in charge.

    , @Old Palo Altan
    Jewish physics?

    Perhaps Lenard and Stark were right about its baleful effect after all.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people.
     
    White Democrats.

    Leave us "economic royalists" out of this.
    , @Jack D
    Were they “white people” when they worked for Hitler?

    Which of the above worked for Hitler? Any?

    Were they “white people” when they spied for Stalin?

    How many of the above were Soviet spies? A couple but most weren't.
    , @oddsbodkins
    They worked against Hitler, for the obvious reason. Then they formed the foundation of a physics and mathematics cognoscenti that gave the US a key technical edge over Stalin after the war. They were the most productive group of immigrants this country has ever had.

    I'm pretty sure a lot of the soldiers who didn't die invading Japan or fighting the Soviets conventionally were white.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. Yak-15 says:
    @AndrewR
    I recently watched Narcos on Netflix. Let's just say that a significant amount of "whitewashing" was done: characters who IRL were at least noticeably mestizo if not overwhelmingly indio were played by much whiter actors. In one case, there's a general who has a two flashback scenes: one from his childhood and one as a young man. In both the flashback scenes he's played by actors who may actually be 100% non-white, but as a late middle aged man he's played by a man who looks fresh off the boat from Madrid.

    I believe there's also characters played by actors less white than the real people off of whom they're based.

    The most amusing miscasting is of the first two season's main character: Pablo Escobar. Wagner Moura is no less white than Escobar was but not only is he not from Medellin, or Colombia, he's not even a native Spanish speaker.

    One of the Cali Cartel's capos is played by a Portuguese guy too.

    All and all it's a great show but I chuckled at some of the casting choices.
    It's probably relatively immune to SJW rent-seeking given that most [all???] SJWs are really stupid and don't understand racial realities in Latin America.

    Have you seen Season 3 yet? They feature some full-blown SJW poz with an intimate gay dancing scene with Pacho. It was so unnecessary and so graphic. Really turned me off from watching any more of the show.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Lmao very snowflaky of you.

    The real Pacho was indeed openly homosexual. I thought the scene was great because it demonstrated the power that he had in Cali. How many gay guys in Colombia could have been so open with their sexuality in that era or even now outside of a gay club? The juxtaposition of the dance with his murder of the guy immediately afterwards made for a very interesting, and shocking, scene.

    A lot of things in that show are graphic. I think you're highly overreacting.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. Thea says:
    @Joe Sweet
    along those same lines...Here's George Clooney defending his current movie at the SWPL Olympiad known as the Toronto International Film Festival against charges of tone-deaf portrayal of blacks (and other race issues in Hollywood).

    http://www.indiewire.com/2017/09/george-clooney-interview-suburbicon-diversity-hollywood-1201874750/


    “Of course, Charlottesville happens, because every few years Charlottesville happens again,” he said. “We keep forgetting that we haven’t excised that original sin completely. When I was growing up in Kentucky, the civil-rights movement had its big wave and segregation was exorcised from this country. We really felt like we were on this trajectory toward it all being finished. It wasn’t something you thought would be around. It’s a surprise that it’s still a part of our world.”

    As a filmmaker, Clooney said it took years for him to tackle race because he had yet to find the right project. “A lot of people ask me why I haven’t done any movies about Darfur or South Sudan,” he said, recalling his advocacy in the region. “Well, I haven’t found the script that’s right to do it. My personal life and where I go — philanthropic things — have always been toward whatever is inclusive, not exclusive. That’s always been an important part of my life. It’s just hard to find those films.”

    But Clooney added that he would rather see more minority filmmakers work their way into the industry, echoing the rise of Mexican filmmakers in Hollywood over a decade ago —the so-called “Three Amigos” of Alfonso Cuaron, Alejandro Gonzalez Iñarritu, and Guillermo del Toro, whose “The Shape of Water” just won the Golden Lion at the Venice International Film Festival.

    “All these great Mexican filmmakers showed up, it was like, fuck, this is great filmmaking,” Clooney said. “That’s what I’d like to see… some really interesting young filmmakers out there. You want to feel something fresh and new constantly. You want people pushing the limits. There’s a way to make things much cheaper now so there are a lot of different voices out there.”
     

    What a nitwit. He apparently thinks because these three Mexican directors have names similar to the guys who do the yard work at his LA mansion that they look like his gardeners too. There's nothing "minority" about those three amigos unless you are taking the global view and are recognizing that whites are a minority.

    http://www.trbimg.com/img-54e7f3ee/turbine/la-apphoto-fox-s-golden-globe-awards-party1-jpg-20150220/1150/1150x647

    Lends credence to the idea you must sell your soul and worship Jewish filmmakers to make it in Hollywood.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous
    In this case, she's not using it because it's just a general negative intensifier. She's using it because she's playing to domestic politics, and on the domestic political scene, Putin has been explicitly embraced as a "white authoritarian leader" of sorts by white nationalists, regardless of what Putin himself really is.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/richard-spencer-trump-alt-right-white-nationalist/

    Spencer calls Russia “the most powerful white power in the world” and admires Vladimir Putin’s authoritarianism—he would gladly admit most Russians into his ideal ethnostate.
     
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/page/ct-trump-putin-russia-perspec-0517-20170516-story.html

    Rising self-described white nationalist Matthew Heimbach also has praised Putin's Russia as "the axis for nationalists," according to an interview by Business Insider. "I really believe that Russia is the leader of the free world right now," he told the news website. "Putin is supporting nationalists around the world and building an anti-globalist alliance, while promoting traditional values and self-determination."
     

    I honestly don’t understand why the Western right keeps falling for these guys (their last love affair was with Hitler – that didn’t turn out well either). Yes, they hate the decadent West and you hate the decadent West, but that doesn’t mean that they are your friends.

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play. Americans , no matter how rightist, would never allow themselves to be ruled by a Putin.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn’t give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties – his #1 loyalty is to himself and his family, then to his inner circle, then to the Russian people and YOU are way,way outside the circle of trust.

    Read More
    • Agree: Abe
    • Replies: @Anon
    Putin has improved the living standard for the average Russian and improved the Russian economy quite a bit. This is a big departure from all his predecessors be they communists or Tsars, who all just lined their own pockets and didn't care about the average person. It's also a big departure for an autocrat, period. Autocrats all over the world in all eras just look after themselves and don't care about the 'little people.' Putin didn't have to bother, but he did. That indicates to me that he is moved by something other than simple self-interest.
    , @AM

    I honestly don’t understand why the Western right keeps falling for these guys (their last love affair was with Hitler – that didn’t turn out well either). Yes, they hate the decadent West and you hate the decadent West, but that doesn’t mean that they are your friends.
     
    I think the question is, despite repeated attempts to explain it to you, do you understand anything about the Western society around you...like at all? Yes, Americans think everyone wants to them, but so Jews, so do the French, so does everyone on the planet. It takes a lot of imagination and displine to see someone else's POV and appreciated for what it is.

    @Anon stated it better, but quite simply, it's obvious that Putin is invested in Russia's future acts along those lines. Agree with statism or don't (it's not like Russia can really afford "real" communism anymore) or whatever specific actions he takes. The administration from this Western is that he's acting like steward for his people.

    In fairness, Hitler acted that way. However, pulled switcheroo on the German people after it was all too late. That happens, too. Hitler's genocides are huge moral issue - but his turncoat actions on his people were another aspect that doesn't get talked about very much. That's why so much of the SJW stuff is projection about Trump. Probably the least likely person to have turned turncoat is Trump and the most likely is Hilary Clinton.
    , @anonymous

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play.
     
    You could say that about every nation not named the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn’t give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties
     
    You could say this about every nation that is not in North America or Western Europe.
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Putin himself doesn’t give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy ...

    YOU are way, way outside the circle of trust.
     

    A big part of it is who Putin pisses off. When Spencer and company continue to praise Putin, they’re fully aware that globalist ‘cosmopolitans’ like Stephens, Boot, and Gessen (#103) will get that much more vocally neurotic. Which leads to more woke goyish noticing.

    The “Western right” (I think you mean alt-right?) knows that ‘cosmopolitans’ don’t give a rat’s ass for white-bread Americans—in fact regards them (along with almost everyone else) as their enemy.

    White-bread ‘fellow Americans’ are way, way outside their circle of trust.

    , @Cagey Beast
    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play. Americans , no matter how rightist, would never allow themselves to be ruled by a Putin.

    Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality, freedom and fair play carry on only vestigially. The mother country -- home of Speaker's Corner and Westminster -- now jails people for rude tweets. The social contract between Crown, nobility, gentry and yeomanry was broken with de-industrialization and mass immigration and emigration. White Anglosphere countries must metaphorically pass one another in the street like strangers because it would be racist to suggest Canada has more in common with Australia or New Zealand than it does with Burma or Burundi.

    You mention freedom and fair play and I point to the last sixteen or twenty-six years of "Wag The Dog", spin and a kind of low cult of Lie Magic that guides the words and actions of our governing classes. British and American civic virtues are being smothered if they're not already dead.

    Being considered far outside Putin's circle of trust would a step up from where the Bush family, Mitt Romney, the Clintons, Dave Cameron, Tony Blair, John McCain or Theresa May place us. Neutrality from a faraway leader is better than active hostility at home.

    , @anonymous

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play.
     
    You could say that about every nation not named the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn’t give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties
     
    You could say this about every nation that is not in North America or Western Europe.
    , @Cagey Beast
    I was just reminded of your appeal to the "Anglo-Saxon" ideas of ideas of morality or freedom and fair play when I read this:

    World Anti-Doping Agency Clears 95 Russian Athletes
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/12/sports/olympics/russian-doping-wada.html

    They used the anti-doping charge to punish Russia before the Olympics in Rio and now they quietly inform us there was no case. How very typical.

    The Anglosphere has been in a spiral of increasingly weasel-like, mendacious, shameless and cowardly tricks of this sort since at least the era of George Bush Sr. and John Major. The Russians seem to have a stronger sense of gentlemanly fair play than we do now. The Anglosphere is degenerate and has been for quite a while. I can say so because it's my Anglosphere too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    The fundamental problem with Hillary and the white Democrats is that they don’t understand the difference between Raising Up and Pushing Down. They crow about how great it is and noble they are to raise up minorities, and they’ve been able to get somewhere with this narrative for the past 40 years, but they don’t understand the narrative of pushing whites down falls flat for whites. No one votes for their own oppression, absolutely nobody. All this talk about pushing whites down just strips away the veil of nobility and makes it plain that all minorites want is an ugly, naked power/money grab which they don’t deserve any more than anyone else does.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Either math is not their strong suit or else they pretend it is not. They claim that they are practicing "positive" discrimination or just giving people a leg up (from FDR onward Democrats have been great at manipulating the language to make essentially Communist or Statist projects sound as American as apple pie - who could be against giving people a leg up?). The problem is that in many areas (e.g. college admissions) the # of seats, etc. is fixed in the short run so this is what is known as a "zero sum game" - if I "help" one person then I can only do so by "hurting" someone else but white people were not supposed to notice that they were on the losing end of the game. If you "noticed" this made you a "racist" so shut up, you racist. This is not really a recipe for winning love and affection - the beatings will continue until morale improves! And of course, they exempted themselves from their own rules - letting more blacks into Stanford did not mean that Chelsea couldn't attend, it meant that some farm boy from Iowa couldn't go.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Declane
    Just out of curiosity I googled the president of Mexico to see how white he looked. He looks as white as the average Italian-American in my neighborhood. It's funny how people talk about Mexicans and racism and all that without ever acknowledging that there are basically two races in Mexico - the ones with a drop of native blood and the ones with a bucket.

    But he is 5'7" so at least he shows his solidarity with his lessers by not reaching his full European height.

    Average male height in Spain is about 5’8″ or 5’9″.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @res
    She is on the way, but I think she needs to take a field trip to post-Somali Minneapolis:

    I come from Minnesota, land of the Lutheran. In Minnesota, the police pull you over if you are going 5 mph over the speed limit. And there are actually police to pull you over. Drinking and driving? You lose your license the first time. As it should be.
     
    P.S. Agree with it or not that article is a good example of state-level immigriping.

    I don’t quite see it as immigriping: a.) she says she’s leaving (if only other immigripers would do the same); b.) she’s not asking for special status or protection – she asks for rule of law.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    I think it is immigriping, but I agree with you that she is not showing the most pathological behaviors associated with it which you describe. Perhaps we need more detailed words? immidemanding might work conceptually, but it doesn't exactly roll off the tongue.
    , @Jack Hanson
    She's from Minnesota.

    I'm more likely to believe that she's reacting hysterically.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. @Matthew Kelly
    Did it not begin with Susan Sontag?

    If not Sontag, then Norman Mailer and his infamous “White Negro” essay.
    “Sophisticated” white people romanticizing blacks as more earthy and authentic goes back at least to the 1940s. By extension, it turns into self-hatred of these whites as they disown their parents’ musical tastes, etc. It took til the 60s with Mailer and Sontag to openly start inverting the old hierarchy of racial superiority assumptions.

    Read More
    • Agree: Travis, Seneca
    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
    Romanticizing blacks goes back to the abolitionists. Here is a passage from "The Works of William E. Channing, D.D.," originally written in 1841:

    The African carries within him, much more than we, the germs of a 
meek, long-suffering, loving virtue. A 
short residence among the negroes in the West Indies impressed me with 
their capacity of improvement. On all sides I heard of their religious tendencies, the noblest in human nature. I 
saw, too, on the plantation where I 
resided, a gracefulness and dignity of 
form and motion, rare in my own native 
New England. And this is the race 
which has been selected to be trodden 
down and confounded with the brutes.

    Undoubtedly the negroes are debased, 
for were slavery not debasing, I should 
have little quarrel with it. But let not 
their degradation be alleged in proof of 
peculiar incapacity of moral elevation. 
They are given to theft; but there is 
no peculiar, aggravated guilt in stealing 
from those by whom they are robbed 
of all their rights and their very persons. 
They are given to falsehood; but this 
is the very effect produced by oppression on the Irish peasantry. They are undoubtedly sensual; and yet the 
African countenance seldom shows that coarse, brutal sensuality which is so 
common in the face of the white man. 
I should expect from the African race, 
if civilized, less energy, less courage, less intellectual originality, than in our 
race, but more amiableness, tranquillity, gentleness, and content. They might 
not rise to an equality in outward condition but would probably be a much 
happier race. There is no reason for holding such a race in chains: they 
need no chain to make them harmless.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Hillary’s ghostwriter is using “white” because Hillary wants to be a victim. She’s a narcissist who can’t accept that she wasn’t good enough to beat a guy like Trump, so she rationalizes her defeat as coming from some outside force. In her mind, it’s not because she’s politically tone-deaf (attacking whites after Dallas), incompetent (Putin = white nationalist), out-of-touch (“the only thing wrong with the Iraq war was that I didn’t order it because it would have gone swimmingly if I had”), dangerous (“Trump should have attacked EVERY Syrian airbase!”), corrupt ($32 million in speaking fees), or a cheat (Bernie Sanders) — no, no, no…it’s the fault of the evil whites! Imma victim, imma victim!

    Never-mind Hillary’s racial hypocrisy:

    1. made damn sure Chelsea went to a private school back when they lived in majority-black D.C.

    2. made damn sure she didn’t live around any blacks by moving to 94% white Chappaqua

    3. was responsible for floating the “Obama born in Kenya” line through her aides back in 2008

    4. regularly adopted a condescending black preacher accent when talking to blacks

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  214. Thea says:
    @Anonymous
    In this case, she's not using it because it's just a general negative intensifier. She's using it because she's playing to domestic politics, and on the domestic political scene, Putin has been explicitly embraced as a "white authoritarian leader" of sorts by white nationalists, regardless of what Putin himself really is.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/richard-spencer-trump-alt-right-white-nationalist/

    Spencer calls Russia “the most powerful white power in the world” and admires Vladimir Putin’s authoritarianism—he would gladly admit most Russians into his ideal ethnostate.
     
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/page/ct-trump-putin-russia-perspec-0517-20170516-story.html

    Rising self-described white nationalist Matthew Heimbach also has praised Putin's Russia as "the axis for nationalists," according to an interview by Business Insider. "I really believe that Russia is the leader of the free world right now," he told the news website. "Putin is supporting nationalists around the world and building an anti-globalist alliance, while promoting traditional values and self-determination."
     

    i wonder if Putin’s American fan club is of any use to him or if they are viewed as either crazy or irrelevant

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    They are only useful insofar as they throw sand in the gears of the American political system. Putin views the world as a zero sum game so that whatever weakens American strengthens Russia. This is the same reason Putin made (half-hearted and not very significant) attempts to mess with the election. While in reality these had no effect on the election (despite what Hillary and the Democrats keep saying) they are the kind of thing that Putin likes to do in order to mess with our heads, which he views as even steven because the West keeps sticking its nose in his business.

    I'm sure that they have no love for their American fans because they realize that if the situation was reversed they would regard these guys as traitors. In the old days, you could convince American traitors that they were spying for "world communism" which was a greater cause than mere American patriotism but nowadays they can't pretend that they represent anything but narrow Russian parochial interests.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. @grapesoda
    Because it's ESPN. They've been going full SJW for years now, in spite of tanking ratings and financial difficulties.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-28/espn-can-t-afford-to-go-on-like-this

    http://www.businessinsider.com/espns-layoffs-spell-trouble-for-live-sports-2017-3

    They also had a "groundbreaking" female-only announcing crew for the Monday night game, which all non-SJWs thought was terrible.

    ESPN is the Democratic Party of cable channels, ie too arrogant to try to correct their mistakes.

    I’ve actually grown to half-way like Doris Burke on NBA broadcasts (doing commentary, not play-by-play) so I consider myself open-minded to the idea, but I thought the MNF broadcast was–well, not terrible, but it wasn’t great. There is no doubt the only reason she got that spot was because she was a woman. She doesn’t have that great a voice and was at best merely competent. She didn’t seem to realize the final kick had been blocked–it was up to the male commentator to point that out–she just said it was missed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. @anonymous-antimarxist
    "Field Honkies" is great but how about some more alternatives to go along.

    For example: "Podium Jockey" for when a "white???" beta male stands emasculated, covering his genitals and looking at his shoes, while allowing the strong and sassy black lesbian BLM activists push him aside to take their turns at the mike in accordance to their rights as part of the "progressive stack".

    https://www.google.com/search?q=photo+bernie+sanders+podium+blm&tbm=isch&imgil=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%253BGidxYzzRGYRPEM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.seattletimes.com%25252Fseattle-news%25252Fshould-protesters-have-interrupted-bernie-sanders-rally%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%252CGidxYzzRGYRPEM%252C_&usg=__L1PXicIGLYHKqLHuQtU5pLYXeOw%3D&biw=588&bih=323&ved=0ahUKEwi_psX8h6DWAhXm3YMKHSCnDqYQyjcIMw&ei=lgq4Wb-DKOa7jwSgzrqwCg#imgrc=sP_oqwszzCGeRM:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=photo+bernie+sanders+podium+blm&tbm=isch&imgil=sP_oqwszzCGeRM%253A%253BGidxYzzR

    "Field Honky" is a awesome phrase but a little forced in its imagery , but "Podium Jockey" is even more lethal because it comes with an already established cuckoldry image you just can not erase from your brain once you see it. Furthermore it brings to mind a primal fear all men have of being castrated/emasculated by one's opponent or yet ever more dreadful, an otherwise inferior female.

    About “Podium Jockey”;

    While it is an obvious play on Lawn Jockey, Lawn Jockey is really a misnomer. “Lawn Footman” would have been more correct, since it was the footman’s job to help his master dismount his horse or carriage and to walk the horses to the stable for a cool down and put them to down for the night in the stables.

    When middle class first folks moved to the suburbs and still thought as their cars as horseless carriages, the idea of having a symbolic statue posing as a Lawn Jockey or Footman was a nice touch.

    Still the idea of “white???” politician letting POC minorities have the microphone while they stand looking on and emasculated is a powerful image.

    Instead of “Field Honky” I think “House Honky” is better. And it is not just because of the alliteration but because the “House Honky” unlike the “Field Honky” can actually delude himself that people still care about his status and what he has to say.

    Increasingly White???, and especially White Goyim Democrats may delude themselves that what they think matters but they will find themselves viewed as irrelevant by those POC voters that they must have the support of.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D
    I honestly don't understand why the Western right keeps falling for these guys (their last love affair was with Hitler - that didn't turn out well either). Yes, they hate the decadent West and you hate the decadent West, but that doesn't mean that they are your friends.

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play. Americans , no matter how rightist, would never allow themselves to be ruled by a Putin.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn't give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties - his #1 loyalty is to himself and his family, then to his inner circle, then to the Russian people and YOU are way,way outside the circle of trust.

    Putin has improved the living standard for the average Russian and improved the Russian economy quite a bit. This is a big departure from all his predecessors be they communists or Tsars, who all just lined their own pockets and didn’t care about the average person. It’s also a big departure for an autocrat, period. Autocrats all over the world in all eras just look after themselves and don’t care about the ‘little people.’ Putin didn’t have to bother, but he did. That indicates to me that he is moved by something other than simple self-interest.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Some autocrats do stay in power a long time without improving the lives of their subjects, but it goes without saying that an autocrat has a much higher chance of staying in power if he does improve living standards for his people.
    , @Jack D
    Whatever improvement the Russian people have seen was mostly as a result of high oil prices and now that oil prices are back down these improvements are likely to fade. For every kopeck that the average Russian sees, Putin has put a billion in a Swiss bank account and 100 million to his cronies. BTW, the Russian standard of living did improve under the Communists (except at the very end when things started to fall apart). By world historical standards (and Putin standards) the Communists stole remarkably little for themselves because they really believed that stuff at the beginning. Mostly they just wasted it on the military and in inefficiency but they didn't actually steal much for themselves personally.
    , @Anon
    "Clooney is a loser who hasn’t been in a good movie since George W. was president"

    American, Descendants, Gravity, Tomorrowland.

    Not bad.

    "The Coens are also overrated hacks who make artsy-fartsy movies that appeal only to other hacks who like to think of themselves as more sophisticated than the lower classes they despise."

    As with Allen, they had their misses. But unlike Allen, even their lesser films have something to recommend them.

    And they had some homeruns, esp Barton Fink, Big Lebowski, and O Brother.

    Many of their films are enjoyable. At any rate, they've rarely been artsy-fartsy.
    They go for cult-middlebrow.

    Their most 'artsy' movie was maybe Inside Llewyn Davis. Lacks a core but has some images that linger. Works as mood piece.

    , @Anon
    "They’re not used to the idea that this country is fragmenting into masses that no longer assimilate and that-old fashioned coalition building no longer works on a national level."

    Not quite.

    Among non-white minorities, only two are problematic. Blacks and 'Hispanics'. Blacks are prone to violence, volume, and bad behavior. Mexicans(bulk of 'Hispanics') are not problematic per se, but there are now TOO MANY of them. This would not be a problem if Mexico was far away like Pakistan. But it has long border with the US.

    As for other non-white minorities, they could easily assimilate IF there was a solid, confident, and insistent majority and proud narrative. Back in 75 when I was living in a housing project filled with diversity, 'American' was synonymous with White, and no one was bothered by it or offended by it.

    It became a problem because of the rise of PC that instilled minority kids and then non-white intellectuals around the world with anti-white ideology. White Leftists injected anti-white-ness into these kids. Look at Canada. White teachers and professors fill non-white kids with anti-white hate. It's like a drug to white 'leftists' to feel so good about themselves as virtuous good whites dumping on bad whites and embracing 'diversity'.

    In many cases, you will find the immigrant parents of these kids are far less anti-white or not anti-white at all. It's their kids who pick it up from pop culture and PC.
    Also, multi-culturalism doesn't create separate identities in the US with the possible exception of Mexicans who have a historic claim to SW areas and are the solid majority in many parts of SW.
    For most non-black minorities, multi-culturalism just means bitching about whites. It's more about anti-white than pro-anything. After all, they willfully chose to leave their own nations, cultures, and peoples to come and live in a foreign land, the US. So, multi-culturalism puts them in a limbo. They don't want to be part of the old world and its heritage , which they eagerly left. Many cannot speak their own language or even know any history. Their entire worldview is pop culture and PC. But multi-culturalism tells them not to join with White. So, they are stuck in a limbo state. That is why these limbo-kids attach themselves to homo culture or black stuff(BLMx100 to enter Stanford, Seoul Brother, etc).

    Back in 75, before all this multi-cultural PC stuff, most non-whites just wanted to part of what they understood to be White America.

    Now, how did things turn out this way? Well, there is the factor of White Leftism. But there is also the problematic white minority, the Jewish Community that is paranoid about whiteness and Christianity and have been using 'white guilt' to tame and manipulate whites. For 'white guilt' to be activated, whites must be impugned as the oppressor vis-a-vis just about any minority group.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. P.S. If I order a Mugabe Jacket, should it have my face on it or Bob’s?

    Oh Steve,

    Please get the same one as Bob.

    Then post a Youtube video of you being interviewed wearing it.

    I can only image the internets going nuts over your act of cultural appropriation.

    It will drive lots of traffic to UNZ.com.

    The only drawback being that you would have to move over to the dark web with Andrew Anglin and blog from an undisclosed location.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  219. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play.”

    So. What does that matter? Most of the world comes from outside those same ideas, including most of the American left.

    “2nd, Putin himself doesn’t give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy.”

    1. People want a leader like Putin, not literally Putin himself.

    2. You seem to have an unhealthy, neoconesque fascination with Putin. In all of your posts about him, you overgeneralize, ascribe moral judgements, see conspiracy, and feign some kind of expert knowledge of his psychology that is most certainly not warranted.

    Putin is a guy like any other guy who cares about his interests. He is not especially evil or devious and not even on the same level of evil as our last two presidents, both of whom murdered thousands of innocent civilians with drone attacks and one of whom invaded an entire country based on lies about WMD, resulting in the deaths of thousands more.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  220. AndrewR says:
    @Yak-15
    Have you seen Season 3 yet? They feature some full-blown SJW poz with an intimate gay dancing scene with Pacho. It was so unnecessary and so graphic. Really turned me off from watching any more of the show.

    Lmao very snowflaky of you.

    The real Pacho was indeed openly homosexual. I thought the scene was great because it demonstrated the power that he had in Cali. How many gay guys in Colombia could have been so open with their sexuality in that era or even now outside of a gay club? The juxtaposition of the dance with his murder of the guy immediately afterwards made for a very interesting, and shocking, scene.

    A lot of things in that show are graphic. I think you’re highly overreacting.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yak-15
    Yea probably
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. AndrewR says:
    @Anon
    Putin has improved the living standard for the average Russian and improved the Russian economy quite a bit. This is a big departure from all his predecessors be they communists or Tsars, who all just lined their own pockets and didn't care about the average person. It's also a big departure for an autocrat, period. Autocrats all over the world in all eras just look after themselves and don't care about the 'little people.' Putin didn't have to bother, but he did. That indicates to me that he is moved by something other than simple self-interest.

    Some autocrats do stay in power a long time without improving the lives of their subjects, but it goes without saying that an autocrat has a much higher chance of staying in power if he does improve living standards for his people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. JackOH says:
    @bomag

    America’s Left saw its opportunity in eliding the difference between most Whites’ cordial but wary relations between Blacks, and the Nazis’ attitude toward disfavored underclasses.
     
    Some of that.

    Part of it is that "Whites" were marketed as the ultimate can-do class that was going to fix all the world's problems. That the problems persist leads to blaming and shaming of those in power and a call for their replacement.

    Agree. I’m genuinely baffled by how those very decent men and women who came of age in the 1930s and 1940s were so quickly ensorcelled by some truly nasty and weird ideas that seem to have found a permanent home among Democrats. I’m guessing they were blindsided by Leftists of various stripes who had long viewed their fellow Americans as a sort of enemy of goodthinking. Among some pacifists and Blacks, White Americans were almost surely greater crimethinkers than Hitler because Hitler was there and White Americans were here. You’re right there are probably a few other major factors involved, but not a whole lot.

    Having grown up in the prosperous and confident America of the 1950s and 1960s, I guess I’m just tired of seeing so many Americans being scolded like a dog who’d just soiled the carpet by our truly rotten political elites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “i wonder if Putin’s American fan club is of any use to him or if they are viewed as either crazy or irrelevant”

    Actually, it is of tremendous use to us. Putin having a sizable fan club in the US might encourage him to be diplomatic and conciliatory so as to not lose any kind of respect and leverage he might have with them.

    People respect Putin because he looks out for his country’s interests. The US has not had a president who has done so in many years. That’s what people want – someone who is on their side for once.

    Read More
    • Agree: Opinionator
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  224. ‘In response Mobley says that Halls “apologised on behalf of England”, before putting on an exaggerated southern accent and joking: “Do you want some grits?”, in a reference to the ground corn dish popular in the south.’

    A Brit apologizes on behalf of England for the antebellum South? That’s hilarious.

    And I’d love to hear a Brit put on a southern drawl or a Black from the deep south do a British accent.

    Moral of the story: Never drop your guard around Nice White Women. No jokes, no fun, no horseplay allowed.

    Moral II of the story: This is yet another reason to root against the Oregon Ducks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  225. BB753 says:
    @Maj. Kong
    Buckets of Chinese (and soon Indian) money say otherwise.

    When was the last time a construction bubble went wrong?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. Jack D says:
    @Mr. Anon

    “Whatever reason” might include the fact that they considered much of the important theoretical underpinnings to be Jüdische Physik and therefore off limits from consideration in weapons design and the fact that many of their most important nuclear scientists were Jewish and therefore not able to participate in the effort.
     
    They didn't and it wasn't. Nobody outside of a handful of old and ambitious regime-aligned physicists, such as Stark and Lenard, believed all that crap about "jewish physics". Germany didn't lack for scientific and technical talent, even considering the exodus of physicists in the 30s. What they lacked was the material capability. Fighting a war on 1 1/2 - 2 fronts, and occupying most of Europe, and only being a nation of about 90 million (including Austria, and various other german enclaves), they just didn't have the wherewithal for such a massive undertaking. Especially as they were already engaged in another massive weapons program (which, as it happened, had no real military value) - the development of ballistic missiles. Heisenberg and others had concluded early on in the War that developing a nuclear weapon (if it were possible at all) could never be accomplished in time to have any impact on the outcome of the War. I believe they thought that applied to us too.

    I believe they thought that applied to us too.

    They were right in the European theater – the American bomb came too late to affect the war in Europe. Although I am not sure that Berlin and Hamburg would have looked that much worse if they had been nuked instead of relentlessly bombed.

    It’s true that the Germans chose to concentrate their efforts on the ballistic missile rather than the nuclear warhead and that their resources were not unlimited, but still I think that the exodus of Jewish scientists and the ill repute of “Jewish physics” had more of an impact than you admit. By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front. Out of 26 German nuclear physicists cited in the literature before 1933, 50% emigrated. The ones that stayed – Diebner, Esau, Gerlach, Schumann, etc. – were not exactly the #1 names in 20th century nuclear physics – they were definitely the “B” team. Deutsche Physik hacks were given undue promotions and Heisenberg only survived because his ma was friends with Himmler’s ma.

    This wiki is I think a fair treatment and points to the exodus of scientific talent as an important if not the only factor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nuclear_weapon_project

    It might have been that they wouldn’t have achieved nuclear weapons anyway, but losing their best scientists sure didn’t help. Many of the guys that they lost ended up being key players in the American effort so it was a double hit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Neoconned
    I watched a documentary once about the German nuclear program during the war and they quoted Heisenberg as saying he intentionally sabotaged it as he didn't want blood on his hands.

    The man was right -- now its on ours and it hasn't come off since....

    Nor can we stop rogue idiots from expanding their usage of these WMDs.....
    , @anonymous

    By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front.
     
    Germans discovered nuclear fission in 1938.
    , @Mr. Anon

    It’s true that the Germans chose to concentrate their efforts on the ballistic missile rather than the nuclear warhead and that their resources were not unlimited, but still I think that the exodus of Jewish scientists and the ill repute of “Jewish physics” had more of an impact than you admit.
     
    No. I've read a great deal about the subject. It wasn't the loss of talent. It was the (comparative) lack of resources.

    "By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front."

    It wasn't a high priority. At best, they hoped to build a reactor. They weren't even trying to enrich Uranium.

    "Out of 26 German nuclear physicists cited in the literature before 1933, 50% emigrated. The ones that stayed – Diebner, Esau, Gerlach, Schumann, etc. – were not exactly the #1 names in 20th century nuclear physics – they were definitely the “B” team. Deutsche Physik hacks were given undue promotions and Heisenberg only survived because his ma was friends with Himmler’s ma."

    That is a mischaracterization of the actual history. Heisenberg was not saved because of his connections to Nazi higher-ups. He was one of the most prominent scientists in Germany at the time, second perhaps only to Planck. And the term "nuclear physicist" barely existed prior to 1933, so any kind of ranking based on that isn't that meaningful.

    "It might have been that they wouldn’t have achieved nuclear weapons anyway, but losing their best scientists sure didn’t help. Many of the guys that they lost ended up being key players in the American effort so it was a double hit."

    Germany did not lose "their best scientists". They lost some of the their best scientists. Most of the physicists who worked on the bomb in the U.S. were American, with an admixture of English and european ex-pats (like Fermi). There were also some german (or other european) Jews who worked on it, some of whom were quite important - Hans Bethe most prominently. Some german-jewish refugee physicists, like Otto Stern and Max Born, didn't work on military projects at all (as far as I can tell), let alone on the A-bomb.

    There were plenty of competent physicists left in Germany. And who knows, Germany might have pulled it off if they had had twice the population they did, greater natural resources and industrial plant, and didn't have to divert an enormous amount of their effort into enslaving a whole continent. In short, if they were America.

    , @anonymous

    By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front.
     
    Germans discovered nuclear fission in 1938.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  227. Neoconned says:
    @eah
    OT

    Inside The Opioid Crisis: What The Mainstream Media Won't Let You See

    http://stockboardasset.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Screen-Shot-2017-09-11-at-9.23.02-AM-1.png

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/451247/steve-bannon-wrong-george-w-bush-foreign-policy-kept-america-safe-post-911

    THIS IS WHY BANNON WAS LET GO.

    Yeah Ivanka, etc probably had something to do with the technicals but thing about it — it was the nasty bloodthirsty chickenhawk neocon SCUM who did it. And their freak show assortment of hangers-on, crony capitalist welfare bums, etc who all leaned REAL heavy on Trump and his various “generals” advisers to cut Bannon loose.

    Think about it for a second.

    War is bad for us but great for military contractors. What would Boeing/Halliburton/Raytheon, etc have done if Trump actually started de-escalating the ME and let those people to their own devices and their own natural habits without us being globocop?

    Not many know but the military budget/DoD budget went UP under Obama EVERY SINGLE YEAR of his administration save 2012 or 2013. And in the year it didn’t go up — it didn’t go up because Obama wanted it to go up but wanted to pay for it with a TAX INCREASE — you know — like how we used to pay for wars with war taxes. But the anarchist-libertarian nutjobs in the GOP tea party movement wanted war financed on the money printer credit card instead. So boom we got a slight cut in the Pentagon budget for a single year.

    To understand the power and influence of this constituency, in 2009 during the dark bowels of the Bush downtown recession EVERYBODY was getting cut. Businesses, etc.

    Guess who didn’t? That’s right — the Pentagon had a I believe I recall a 3% budget hike. Thinking back, it may have been more. Like 4-5%. So while everybody else was getting fucked, they were getting stuffed with free cash.

    As I’ve found out the hard way over the last few years — NO MATTER WHAT IN OUR SYSTEM — somebody loses, and somebody wins, “just a matter of who(m).”

    Think about it — all those military industrial shareholders, industrial trade bodies, to a lesser extent unions, etc — they all stand to lose TRILLIONS in free USA govt money financed via you and me. Because like the black welfare queen smoking crack in her Section 8 shithole shanty trailer or crackden apartment complex — what will these corporate welfare types do if the govt teet is suddenly cut off? My God — they’d have to go out and do what the rest of us suckers do — WORK for our money and our living with our hands or brains and a combination there of. And that requires EFFORT and more importantly WORK — and who the fuck wants to do an icky thing like that?

    I should know — every Sat & Sun mornings I wake up at 4 am and walk a mile to my fast food job where I use bleach to scrub fossilized shit and feces off the toilet bowl. Does it suck? Yeah. But if I didn’t do this I literally would be BEGGING ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD WITH A SIGN BECAUSE THERE ARE NO OTHER STINKING JOBS WHERE I LIVE besides being a cop for a lousy $11/hour. And no, I”m not making that up, welcome to the Deep South.

    For that — I’ll stay at my shit $8/hour Mickey D’s crap job….

    But think about this — all those hangers on and welfare bums who make their bread and their cheese off the Pentagon budget doing “contractor work”, etc.

    The shame if they actually have to go out and do what I do — WALK on my 2 feet from one end of town to the other begging people for employment. Work sucks. As it should.

    Not all of us though are dumb enough to see this as a simple left/right argument.

    We need MILITARY TRIALS or in the least FEDERAL murder/treason trials of neocon subversives. These people are SNAKES IN THE GRASS. TRY THEM BEFORE A JURY OF THEIR PEERS and them HANG OR SHOOT THEM DEAD.

    Don’t send them to Israel or some far off locale, don’t jail them, don’t allow them to breathe. They have blood on their hands and Bannon fucked up thinking he could be a gentleman around these people when they’ve already shown time & again that not only are they bloodthirsty — but they’ll murder civilians to keep their pscyhotic wars and ME graft scam game going…..

    WE NEED TRIALS. RUTHLESSNESS IS OUR ONLY OPTION AT THIS POINT. And please, stop going after minorities or Jews or w/ever. Most minorities are just dumber versions of us. Working proles in the same boat we are in. This is a war against neocon elites. And if we don’t start talking blood and trials — then we will continue to lose with our tail between our legs. Look how Trump got his ass handed to him and now he talks like a gelded cuck.

    The neocons have to BE PURGED and PUT ON TRIAL. No other solution will satiate the country’s ills. Every other issue is background noise before then.

    “This threat has receded as Trump has quite wisely ditched his isolationist campaign rhetoric, expanding American military efforts in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan.

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/451247/steve-bannon-wrong-george-w-bush-foreign-policy-kept-america-safe-post-911″”

    So in other words — Trump was forced over or bought over by the neocons. These people are the single de facto number one threat to the national security and physical and political integrity of our country, money supply, future and vitality. They MUST be brought to justice and purged from the Trump White HOuse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  228. Neoconned says:
    @Jack D

    I believe they thought that applied to us too.
     
    They were right in the European theater - the American bomb came too late to affect the war in Europe. Although I am not sure that Berlin and Hamburg would have looked that much worse if they had been nuked instead of relentlessly bombed.

    It's true that the Germans chose to concentrate their efforts on the ballistic missile rather than the nuclear warhead and that their resources were not unlimited, but still I think that the exodus of Jewish scientists and the ill repute of "Jewish physics" had more of an impact than you admit. By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front. Out of 26 German nuclear physicists cited in the literature before 1933, 50% emigrated. The ones that stayed - Diebner, Esau, Gerlach, Schumann, etc. - were not exactly the #1 names in 20th century nuclear physics - they were definitely the "B" team. Deutsche Physik hacks were given undue promotions and Heisenberg only survived because his ma was friends with Himmler's ma.

    This wiki is I think a fair treatment and points to the exodus of scientific talent as an important if not the only factor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nuclear_weapon_project

    It might have been that they wouldn't have achieved nuclear weapons anyway, but losing their best scientists sure didn't help. Many of the guys that they lost ended up being key players in the American effort so it was a double hit.

    I watched a documentary once about the German nuclear program during the war and they quoted Heisenberg as saying he intentionally sabotaged it as he didn’t want blood on his hands.

    The man was right — now its on ours and it hasn’t come off since….

    Nor can we stop rogue idiots from expanding their usage of these WMDs…..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  229. AM says:
    @Guy de Champlagne
    Yeah Putin is such a great leader that he's almost gotten Russian life expectancy back up to soviet levels. What a man!

    Yeah Putin is such a great leader that he’s almost gotten Russian life expectancy back up to soviet levels. What a man!

    I assume life expectancy figures did not include the millions whose lives were shortened by gulags and such in the USSR? That really tended to put a damper on retirement plans.

    I love the snark over leaders who take over nightmarish situations and make them even marginally better.

    “Sure, I probably couldn’t have done any better if I were in charge, but this is a great opportunity to minimize any step in the right direction.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  230. Jack D says:
    @Anon
    Putin has improved the living standard for the average Russian and improved the Russian economy quite a bit. This is a big departure from all his predecessors be they communists or Tsars, who all just lined their own pockets and didn't care about the average person. It's also a big departure for an autocrat, period. Autocrats all over the world in all eras just look after themselves and don't care about the 'little people.' Putin didn't have to bother, but he did. That indicates to me that he is moved by something other than simple self-interest.

    Whatever improvement the Russian people have seen was mostly as a result of high oil prices and now that oil prices are back down these improvements are likely to fade. For every kopeck that the average Russian sees, Putin has put a billion in a Swiss bank account and 100 million to his cronies. BTW, the Russian standard of living did improve under the Communists (except at the very end when things started to fall apart). By world historical standards (and Putin standards) the Communists stole remarkably little for themselves because they really believed that stuff at the beginning. Mostly they just wasted it on the military and in inefficiency but they didn’t actually steal much for themselves personally.

    Read More
    • Agree: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @anonymous

    )the Communists stole remarkably little for themselves because they really believed that stuff at the beginning.
     
    At the beginning? At the beginning the communists were at their bloodiest. As for stealing, what do you call the great land from the kulaks? The communists ended up with the blood of millions on their hands in their efforts to collectivize, i.e. steal, the land.
    , @Autochthon

    Communists stole remarkably little for themselves because they really believed that stuff at the beginning. Mostly they just wasted it on the military and in inefficiency but they didn’t actually steal much for themselves personally.
     
    You could just as easily be writing about the behaviour (at least since the War of Northern Aggression) of politicians in what used to be the U.S.A.
    , @Anatoly Karlin

    Whatever improvement the Russian people have seen was mostly as a result of high oil prices and now that oil prices are back down these improvements are likely to fade.
     
    There was a mild 2 year recession and now the economy is growing again.

    For every kopeck that the average Russian sees, Putin has put a billion in a Swiss bank account and 100 million to his cronies.
     
    Yeah, this is nonsense.
    , @bored identity



    A. " By world historical standards (and Putin standards) the Communists stole remarkably little for themselves because they really believed that stuff at the beginning. "

    B. (((...)))

    C. "...Putin has put a billion in a Swiss bank account and 100 million to his cronies."

     

    Hey Tdzak, you've missed to disclose in your "ABC 's Of Who's Robbing Russians" expose anything about, by world historical standards, Grand Theft Country that occured AFTER USSR Communists departed, and BEFORE Vlad took power over remnants of the evil empire


    bored identity will take this opportunity to remind commentariat that , by iSteve historical standards, Semibankirschina is something that Tdzak D prefers to ignore everytime he mccaines some warmongering bovine excrement against The Evil Emperor That Couldn't:



    https://youtu.be/Q2Cl8lSv9Is?t=47m11s


    "Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn used term 'Semibankirschina' in his critical 1998 essay Russia under Avalanche to describe the current political regime and to warn people of what he considered an organized crime syndicate that controlled the President and 70% of all Russian money.

    The identities of seven bankers are usually linked to the interview given by Boris Berezovsky to Financial Times where he names seven people who together controlled about 50% of all Russian economics and influenced the most important internal political decisions of Russia:

    Boris Berezovsky
    Mikhail Fridman
    Vladimir Gusinsky
    Mikhail Khodorkovsky
    Vladimir Potanin
    Alexander Smolensky
    Pyotr Aven

    also,
    Vladimir Vinogradov
    and Vitaly Malkin.

    They formed what became known as Semibankirschina (or seven bankers), a small group of business moguls with a great influence on Boris Yeltsin and his political environment.

    Together they controlled from 50% to 70% of all Russian finances between 1996 and 2000.

    Fridman, Potanin, Aven and Malkin are the only ones on the list to have retained their influence in the Putin era.

    Khodorkovsky, Berezovsky and Gusinsky "have been purged by the Kremlin."
    , @anonymous

    )the Communists stole remarkably little for themselves because they really believed that stuff at the beginning.
     
    At the beginning? At the beginning the communists were at their bloodiest. As for stealing, what do you call the great land from the kulaks? The communists ended up with the blood of millions on their hands in their efforts to collectivize, i.e. steal, the land.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  231. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Cagey Beast
    Steve Bannon is right to say Hillary's not very bright about national politics but she's a genius at the level of social politics. At the matriarchal game she's unmatched. She stood by wayward Bill because she saw the long game, she got her plain daughter married off well and her Clinton Foundation is a comfortable little nest egg by even Saudi standards. She's even a bit of a living martyr at the hands of mean White men. That last bit is the cherry on top of the White lady masterpiece that is her life.

    I’m not certain Hillary’s so good at the matriarchial thing. Cheating Bill has humiliated her multiple times in public and made her eat dirt. The plain daughter now has a crook father-in-law, a bankrupt mother-in-law, and a hubby whose hedge fund keeps losing astonishing sums of money through sheer ineptitude. As for the Clinton foundation, the strong arm of the law has been nibbling at it for some time, and under Trump things may very well shift into gear for a full investigation. Hillary’s emails have been coming under closer scrutiny because of the moronic antics of her sycophants, namely Comey and Wasserman-Schultz, so I don’t think Hillary will escape in the long run. If she, or Chelsea makes signs that they’re going to run for office in the future, a Republican Jusice Department is going to go after the Clinton Foundation. As for their money, I think it’s likely that most it will be reduced to nothing within 20 years. The Clintons are massive spendthrifts, and once it’s in the hands Chelsea and her boneheaded husband, it will disappear.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  232. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Charles Pewitt
    Whites Without College Degrees(WWCDs) thoroughly dislike mass immigration and multicultural mayhem. In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party was offering open borders mass immigration, amnesty for illegal alien infiltrators and more multicultural mayhem. White voters went with the candidate who promised to deport illegal alien infiltrators, dramatically reduce legal immigration and build a wall on the border between the United States and Mexico.

    President Trump had the brains and balls to win the votes of WWCDs and the ability as a billionaire to maintain many of the votes of upper middle class White voters. Now Hillary Clinton stalks around her imperial compound in the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York in an alcoholic frenzy induced by her bitterness at having been denied the presidency by Donald John Trump and his army of Whites Without College Degrees.

    his army of Whites Without College Degrees.

    Or, in other words, poorly educated losers.

    Is that supposed to be a badge of honour for the orange ogre? (rhetorically speaking :))

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  233. Kevin C. says:
    @Jack D
    You could say that declaring victory prematurely is a common failure of the Left, but you have to understand that the reason that they do it is that they see themselves as being on "the right side of history" and that so often their declarations of victory succeed in creating facts on the ground.

    This usually works (see gay marriage), and usually they are able to suppress any visible white/traditionalist backlash - anyone who protests at being placed upon the garbage heap of history is declared to be a Nazi and doxxed. Unfortunately for Hillary we still have the secret ballot though I predict that Leftists will go after that soon. Aren't we entitled to know how you voted so we can know not to hire you? Why should fascists be allowed to hide their fascist beliefs behind the curtain of the voting booth?

    Unfortunately for Hillary we still have the secret ballot though I predict that Leftists will go after that soon. Aren’t we entitled to know how you voted so we can know not to hire you? Why should fascists be allowed to hide their fascist beliefs behind the curtain of the voting booth?

    Didn’t we already see the start of this with the purging of Brendan Eich for his Prop. 8 vote?

    Read More
    • Replies: @res

    Didn’t we already see the start of this with the purging of Brendan Eich for his Prop. 8 vote?
     
    Sort of. It was for his campaign contribution not his vote.

    Outing campaign contributors to David Duke is a thing now: http://sfbayview.com/2017/08/outing-the-bay-area-campaign-contributors-of-kkk-fascist-david-duke/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  234. AM says:
    @Jack D
    I honestly don't understand why the Western right keeps falling for these guys (their last love affair was with Hitler - that didn't turn out well either). Yes, they hate the decadent West and you hate the decadent West, but that doesn't mean that they are your friends.

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play. Americans , no matter how rightist, would never allow themselves to be ruled by a Putin.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn't give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties - his #1 loyalty is to himself and his family, then to his inner circle, then to the Russian people and YOU are way,way outside the circle of trust.

    I honestly don’t understand why the Western right keeps falling for these guys (their last love affair was with Hitler – that didn’t turn out well either). Yes, they hate the decadent West and you hate the decadent West, but that doesn’t mean that they are your friends.

    I think the question is, despite repeated attempts to explain it to you, do you understand anything about the Western society around you…like at all? Yes, Americans think everyone wants to them, but so Jews, so do the French, so does everyone on the planet. It takes a lot of imagination and displine to see someone else’s POV and appreciated for what it is.

    stated it better, but quite simply, it’s obvious that Putin is invested in Russia’s future acts along those lines. Agree with statism or don’t (it’s not like Russia can really afford “real” communism anymore) or whatever specific actions he takes. The administration from this Western is that he’s acting like steward for his people.

    In fairness, Hitler acted that way. However, pulled switcheroo on the German people after it was all too late. That happens, too. Hitler’s genocides are huge moral issue – but his turncoat actions on his people were another aspect that doesn’t get talked about very much. That’s why so much of the SJW stuff is projection about Trump. Probably the least likely person to have turned turncoat is Trump and the most likely is Hilary Clinton.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  235. Jack D says:
    @Anon
    The fundamental problem with Hillary and the white Democrats is that they don't understand the difference between Raising Up and Pushing Down. They crow about how great it is and noble they are to raise up minorities, and they've been able to get somewhere with this narrative for the past 40 years, but they don't understand the narrative of pushing whites down falls flat for whites. No one votes for their own oppression, absolutely nobody. All this talk about pushing whites down just strips away the veil of nobility and makes it plain that all minorites want is an ugly, naked power/money grab which they don't deserve any more than anyone else does.

    Either math is not their strong suit or else they pretend it is not. They claim that they are practicing “positive” discrimination or just giving people a leg up (from FDR onward Democrats have been great at manipulating the language to make essentially Communist or Statist projects sound as American as apple pie – who could be against giving people a leg up?). The problem is that in many areas (e.g. college admissions) the # of seats, etc. is fixed in the short run so this is what is known as a “zero sum game” – if I “help” one person then I can only do so by “hurting” someone else but white people were not supposed to notice that they were on the losing end of the game. If you “noticed” this made you a “racist” so shut up, you racist. This is not really a recipe for winning love and affection – the beatings will continue until morale improves! And of course, they exempted themselves from their own rules – letting more blacks into Stanford did not mean that Chelsea couldn’t attend, it meant that some farm boy from Iowa couldn’t go.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johann Ricke

    BTW, the Russian standard of living did improve under the Communists (except at the very end when things started to fall apart).
     
    A good chunk of this was probably the kind of wealth redistribution a thief gets from stealing a Faberge egg. Around the beginning of the decade, the top 20% of the population owned over 90% of the wealth. At the time of the October Revolution a century ago, the concentration was probably higher. As the benefits of purloined wealth dissipated, Russia began to see real privation. What better way to kill two birds with one stone than to eliminate the kulak wreckers, further down the wealth scale, via starvation, while paving the way for the repurposing of their lands? Then WWII made it possible to further whittle down the population to keep it well within Malthusian bounds.
    , @Johann Ricke

    Whatever improvement the Russian people have seen was mostly as a result of high oil prices and now that oil prices are back down these improvements are likely to fade.
     
    Brazil ran into a similar situation, due to the bursting of the commodities bubble that had buoyed both economies while on the upswing. GDP per capita peaked at $13,242 in 2011, and was down at $8,810 in 2015. Russia's peak number was $15,559 in 2013. It was down at $9,521 in 2015.
    , @Johann Ricke

    Russian, even today’s rump Russia, is a multicultural society where you can be “Russian” by signing on to the great Russian statist project. Americans always make the mistake of assuming that everyone thinks just like Americans. Putin is impossible to understand in American terms and not a good role model for American white nationalists because Russian history is not like American history and Russians are not Americans.
     
    Precisely. The Russian raison d'etre since the time of Ivan the Terrible seems to have been never-ending territorial expansion. In the long run, rulers accommodate the views of the most numerous of their subjects. Even the ruthless Mongols became Muslims in majority Muslim regions. The real worry is that in the event that Russia brings the majority Muslim former Soviet Republics back into the fold, is that the demographic avalanche will eventually lead to a Muslim leader in charge of the biggest nuclear arsenal on earth. Note that the Chechen Ruslan Khasbulatov came within a hair's breadth of becoming the leader of Russia, almost prevailing over Yeltsin.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    ...letting more blacks into Stanford did not mean that Chelsea couldn’t attend, it meant that some farm boy from Iowa couldn’t go.
     
    Miss Chelsea, who makes Ron Reagan look like MIT material, is herself a beneficiary of affirmative action.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  236. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D
    I honestly don't understand why the Western right keeps falling for these guys (their last love affair was with Hitler - that didn't turn out well either). Yes, they hate the decadent West and you hate the decadent West, but that doesn't mean that they are your friends.

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play. Americans , no matter how rightist, would never allow themselves to be ruled by a Putin.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn't give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties - his #1 loyalty is to himself and his family, then to his inner circle, then to the Russian people and YOU are way,way outside the circle of trust.

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play.

    You could say that about every nation not named the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn’t give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties

    You could say this about every nation that is not in North America or Western Europe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  237. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Tiny Duck
    More evil from white people

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/authorities-gold-miners-at-a-bar-bragged-about-slaughtering-members-of-a-reclusive-brazilian-tribe/ar-AArJeAo?OCID=ansmsnnews11

    blacks do worse than that every day in the U.S. (and where was Tiny Dick?)

    blacks also rape ~75 white women per day and the reverse almost never happens

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  238. Hillary Clinton has pushed anti-White globalization for her whole political life. Wealthy donors paid her husband, Bill, and Hillary herself to use the governmental apparatus of the United States to further the sovereignty-sapping goals of the globalizer donors. Hillary Clinton could not overcome her own past actions nor her own past words to achieve her quest to become the first woman president of the United States.

    Hillary Clinton knew that her actions harmed the interests of tens of millions of White Americans; Hillary didn’t care, she did what she was told to do by the globalizers. Hillary Clinton pushed mass legal immigration, amnesty for illegal alien infiltrators and Hillary did everything in her power to erase the borders of the United States. Hillary Clinton pushed job-killing trade deal scams. Hillary Clinton pushed unnecessary overseas wars that wasted much blood and treasure.

    Hillary Clinton attacked most members of the White core population of America. Hillary Clinton attacked the White Core Americans who founded and drove the patriotic Alt-Right to the center of American politics. The Alt-Right is gaining strength and power and Hillary is stewing in her own juices over her election loss to President Trump.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  239. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D

    I believe they thought that applied to us too.
     
    They were right in the European theater - the American bomb came too late to affect the war in Europe. Although I am not sure that Berlin and Hamburg would have looked that much worse if they had been nuked instead of relentlessly bombed.

    It's true that the Germans chose to concentrate their efforts on the ballistic missile rather than the nuclear warhead and that their resources were not unlimited, but still I think that the exodus of Jewish scientists and the ill repute of "Jewish physics" had more of an impact than you admit. By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front. Out of 26 German nuclear physicists cited in the literature before 1933, 50% emigrated. The ones that stayed - Diebner, Esau, Gerlach, Schumann, etc. - were not exactly the #1 names in 20th century nuclear physics - they were definitely the "B" team. Deutsche Physik hacks were given undue promotions and Heisenberg only survived because his ma was friends with Himmler's ma.

    This wiki is I think a fair treatment and points to the exodus of scientific talent as an important if not the only factor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nuclear_weapon_project

    It might have been that they wouldn't have achieved nuclear weapons anyway, but losing their best scientists sure didn't help. Many of the guys that they lost ended up being key players in the American effort so it was a double hit.

    By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front.

    Germans discovered nuclear fission in 1938.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  240. @Jack D
    I honestly don't understand why the Western right keeps falling for these guys (their last love affair was with Hitler - that didn't turn out well either). Yes, they hate the decadent West and you hate the decadent West, but that doesn't mean that they are your friends.

    First of all, Putin is from a place that is outside of all Anglo-Saxon ideas of morality or freedom or fair play. Americans , no matter how rightist, would never allow themselves to be ruled by a Putin.

    2nd, Putin himself doesn't give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy. Putin sees the world as a series of concentric loyalties - his #1 loyalty is to himself and his family, then to his inner circle, then to the Russian people and YOU are way,way outside the circle of trust.

    Putin himself doesn’t give a rats ass for you, in fact regards you (along with almost everyone else) as his enemy …

    YOU are way, way outside the circle of trust.

    A big part of it is who Putin pisses off. When Spencer and company continue to praise Putin, they’re fully aware that globalist ‘cosmopolitans’ like Stephens, Boot, and Gessen (#103) will get that much more vocally neurotic. Which leads to more woke goyish noticing.

    The “Western right” (I think you mean alt-right?) knows that ‘cosmopolitans’ don’t give a rat’s ass for white-bread Americans—in fact regards them (along with almost everyone else) as their enemy.

    White-bread ‘fellow Americans’ are way, way outside their circle of trust.

    Read More
    • Agree: Thea
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Of all the traditional Russian things that Putin is, anti-Semite is not one of them.
    , @nebulafox
    The alt-right doesn't often get how ideologically flexible Putin is. He has no qualms about bankrolling Die Linke along with the Front National. As long as they serve his own interests or desires-which first and foremost involve staying on top and staying rich, before we get to Russian nationalism-whatever.

    They also don't seem to understand that Russia's hardline, ethinic ultranationalists tend to get locked up by Putin pretty quickly. Putin is not interested in setting off ethnic disputes that could turn ugly very quick in the name of some white consciousness.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  241. Kevin C. says:
    @TheUmpteenthGermanOnHere
    "the Nazis’ attitude toward disfavored underclasses"
    I don't exactly see who antisemites' "disfavored underclasses" were.
    Demonization doesn't an underclass make.

    Indeed, “market dominant minority”≠”underclass”; if anything, it’s much more unsafe to be the former (something we American whites should keep in mind, as we’re about to become one).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  242. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Tiny Duck
    elevator
    roads
    the constitution
    bathing
    automobile
    fireworks
    gunpowder
    cotton gin

    you forgot peanut butter

    also, if you’re black its a pretty good trade off since africans hadnt even invented the wheel

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  243. @Anonymous
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is indeed a nationalist, but not a "white nationalist". He is a Russian nationalist. Russians are not all necessarily all that white-there are Asian and Middle Eastern admixtures in much of the Greater Russian population-but VV Putin does not care about that.

    If it's Russian, he's for it. If he thinks it's bad for Russia, he's against it. Very simple.

    He has a simple yardstick. Oh sure, he likes to wield power, and he is no ascetic or monk. He is very wealthy. But if he thinks it's bad for Russia and Russians no amount of money would sway him.

    I think Trump is a decent person in many ways, but Putin is a far more serious, a far more powerful man. I doubt America will ever really have a Putin.

    Damn shame, really.

    “… I doubt America will ever really have a Putin. ”

    Who cares?!

    bored would believes that even some ten years from now, President Miller with his young Veep Yair Netanyahu could still reverse Hussein’s Pendelum and save our Union- along with the State 51. Area.

    Of course, there will be blood, but…

    “To put things in perspective,” Netanyahu wrote on Facebook, “I’m a Jew, I’m an Israeli, the neo nazis scums [sic] in Virginia hate me and my country.

    But they belong to the past.

    Their breed is dying out.

    “However the thugs of Antifa and [Black Lives Matter] who hate my country (and America too in my view) just as much are getting stronger and stronger and becoming super dominant in American universities and public life.”

    http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-junior-says-leftists-more-dangerous-than-neo-nazis/

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/alien-reptile-and-cloaked-figure-in-yair-netanyahus-meme-have-old-new-origins/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  244. guest says:
    @Maj. Kong
    I'm old enough to recall the "epistemic closure" meme that was spread after the 2012 defeat. The most disgusting thing the left did in 2012 was the "White People mourning Romney" Tumblrism. Their reveling in open anti-white racism (thinking an amnesty and permanent one party rule was right around the corner). That's what sent me out of mainstream WF Buckley conservatism, and into White Identity Politics.

    St. Trayvon of the Skittles was martyred shortly before the 2012 election. In fact, I’m almost certain that was a national news story because of the election. That’s what turned me, along with reading Jared Taylor around the same time.

    The left called forth Nemesis that year, but didn’t learn about it until 4 years later

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The Trayvon agitation was a deliberate, conscious attempt to provoke a re-run of the 1992 LA riots which helped put Bill Clinton in the White House. As the 20th anniversary of those riots approached the agitation intensified noticeably. The left/media knew exactly what they were doing: stoking black anger in order to motivate the black vote. It worked too, as their man duly won the election.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  245. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D
    Whatever improvement the Russian people have seen was mostly as a result of high oil prices and now that oil prices are back down these improvements are likely to fade. For every kopeck that the average Russian sees, Putin has put a billion in a Swiss bank account and 100 million to his cronies. BTW, the Russian standard of living did improve under the Communists (except at the very end when things started to fall apart). By world historical standards (and Putin standards) the Communists stole remarkably little for themselves because they really believed that stuff at the beginning. Mostly they just wasted it on the military and in inefficiency but they didn't actually steal much for themselves personally.

    )the Communists stole remarkably little for themselves because they really believed that stuff at the beginning.

    At the beginning? At the beginning the communists were at their bloodiest. As for stealing, what do you call the great land from the kulaks? The communists ended up with the blood of millions on their hands in their efforts to collectivize, i.e. steal, the land.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  246. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jack D

    I believe they thought that applied to us too.
     
    They were right in the European theater - the American bomb came too late to affect the war in Europe. Although I am not sure that Berlin and Hamburg would have looked that much worse if they had been nuked instead of relentlessly bombed.

    It's true that the Germans chose to concentrate their efforts on the ballistic missile rather than the nuclear warhead and that their resources were not unlimited, but still I think that the exodus of Jewish scientists and the ill repute of "Jewish physics" had more of an impact than you admit. By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front. Out of 26 German nuclear physicists cited in the literature before 1933, 50% emigrated. The ones that stayed - Diebner, Esau, Gerlach, Schumann, etc. - were not exactly the #1 names in 20th century nuclear physics - they were definitely the "B" team. Deutsche Physik hacks were given undue promotions and Heisenberg only survived because his ma was friends with Himmler's ma.

    This wiki is I think a fair treatment and points to the exodus of scientific talent as an important if not the only factor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nuclear_weapon_project

    It might have been that they wouldn't have achieved nuclear weapons anyway, but losing their best scientists sure didn't help. Many of the guys that they lost ended up being key players in the American effort so it was a double hit.

    It’s true that the Germans chose to concentrate their efforts on the ballistic missile rather than the nuclear warhead and that their resources were not unlimited, but still I think that the exodus of Jewish scientists and the ill repute of “Jewish physics” had more of an impact than you admit.

    No. I’ve read a great deal about the subject. It wasn’t the loss of talent. It was the (comparative) lack of resources.

    “By the end of the war, the Germans had made surprisingly little progress, even on the theoretical front.”

    It wasn’t a high priority. At best, they hoped to build a reactor. They weren’t even trying to enrich Uranium.

    “Out of 26 German nuclear physicists cited in the literature before 1933, 50% emigrated. The ones that stayed – Diebner, Esau, Gerlach, Schumann, etc. – were not exactly the #1 names in 20th century nuclear physics – they were definitely the “B” team. Deutsche Physik hacks were given undue promotions and Heisenberg only survived because his ma was friends with Himmler’s ma.”

    That is a mischaracterization of the actual history. Heisenberg was not saved because of his connections to Nazi higher-ups. He was one of the most prominent scientists in Germany at the time, second perhaps only to Planck. And the term “nuclear physicist” barely existed prior to 1933, so any kind of ranking based on that isn’t that meaningful.

    “It might have been that they wouldn’t have achieved nuclear weapons anyway, but losing their best scientists sure didn’t help. Many of the guys that they lost ended up being key players in the American effort so it was a double hit.”

    Germany did not lose “their best scientists”. They lost some of the their best scientists. Most of the physicists who worked on the bomb in the U.S. were American, with an admixture of English and european ex-pats (like Fermi). There were also some german (or other european) Jews who worked on it, some of whom were quite important – Hans Bethe most prominently. Some german-jewish refugee physicists, like Otto Stern and Max Born, didn’t work on military projects at all (as far as I can tell), let alone on the A-bomb.

    There were plenty of competent physicists left in Germany. And who knows, Germany might have pulled it off if they had had twice the population they did, greater natural resources and industrial plant, and didn’t have to divert an enormous amount of their effort into enslaving a whole continent. In short, if they were America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    It's important to realize that in the early 1940s, the concept of a nuclear bomb was not unknown to top physicists anywhere. Actually making one was a very different thing. The Manhattan Project was, more than anything else, an enormous industrial manufacturing endeavor.

    I suspect that behind all the nutty David Icke, Fart Smell, pseudoscience conspiracy theory types out there talking about "the Nazi Bell" as some sort of antigravity, time travel or underwater Antarctica base device, there is a grain of reality. The "Nazi Bell" was in fact most likely a cheap and dirty, cost effective way to make fissionable materials, and the Nazis might have been just a little closer to success than the American and British sides might have wanted generally broadcast. Even so, they were many years away from having sufficient quality and quantity to do the job.

    But would the Allies have gone to drastic and perhaps brutal clandestine measures to keep the Nazi Bell from general knowledge, if they felt its use might bring other countries closer to nuclear capability? Back then there was a general belief that the US might keep a nuclear monopoly indefinitely until Stalin dropped his first test bomb. It's not all that crazy that they would.

    The antigravity and time machine theories could be deliberate disinformation propagated to make the whole thing seem even sillier.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  247. Mr. Blank says:
    @Stephen Paul Foster
    It is interesting to speculate on just when this -- "the increasingly gratuitous usage among white elites of the word 'white' as an insult" -- happened.

    My theory is that Obama's eight year reign of terror was the imprimatur the good whites needed to turn "white" into a moral stigma. Completely aligned with Obama (the black super-hero) was the massive block of opinion-attitude entities -- MSM, entertainment industry, academia. Obama's presidency -- so the story-line goes -- was not only wonderful, but inevitable. And so, it is now time for whites to quit complaining, except their inferior status and step aside. The insults are embedded in the new progressive order, part of the pay back. Hillary tried to be Obama II but for obvious reasons couldn't pull it off. The Dems now are shopping around to find a more suitable choice for 2020. Recently I saw a piece by Douglas Schoen, former Clinton pollster, in the Hill, I think, "arguing" that Michelle Obama is the best Democrat to beat Trump. Makes sense, sort of.

    See: https://www.amren.com/news/2017/03/exterminationist-left-happy-trails-zimbabwe/

    Yeah, that’s my take, too. Obama’s election in 2008, and especially his re-election in 2012 over uber-white Mitt Romney, caused Dems to jump the gun and assume the long-promised multicultural millenium was at hand. They assumed it was safe to drop the mask.

    Trump’s election merely caused them to double down. If Trump wins re-election, it will be for exactly that reason.

    At that point, I’d expect Dems to belatedly realize that even if they’re not a majority, white people will continue to be the dominant force in American politics, and constantly insulting them and wishing for their deaths probably isn’t a smart strategy.

    If Trump loses…well, all bets are off.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous-antimarxist

    constantly insulting them and wishing for their deaths probably isn’t a smart strategy.
     
    It not a question of whether or not it is a smart strategy. For the likes of Jennifer Senior here, Max Boot, Masha Gessen or the late Susan Sontag for that matter and many others it is that they just can not help it. It is instinctual.

    They and their kin are all both deeply neurotic about and envious of all that the Goyim have created. Initially they are able to content themselves with parasitical behaviors against the goyim for their own benefit. But in the end they simply want it all that the goyim have achieved torn down and have been hard at work recruiting and inflaming other racial auxiliaries for the task.

    Smart Strategy??? No is never smart to repeat behaviors that time after time have brought down opprobrium and retaliation upon ones head.

    Instinctual PROTOCOL now that is entirely another matter.

    The Cuckoo can't help his innate behavior, neither can.......
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  248. guest says:
    @Olorin

    I think all this naked hatred against whites is a big mistake for blacks.
     
    Exactly correct.

    And who do you think taught them to act like this starting in the 1960s?

    And what do you think their motives were?

    If blacks ever wake up to how they have been used, and how badly, in the name of "civil" "rights," there is going to be a reckoning...and suddenly the cry is going to be, "Help us, white man! Call the police/National Guard/Army/Navy/Coast Guard to save us!"

    Or so I'm told by conservative Jews of my acquaintance.

    We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people.
     
    You mean the guys who flew Enola Gay? No doubt. Most pilots and plane crews in the 1940s US were.

    What about the people who created the device/processes leading up to it in the Manhattan (ahem) Project?

    What about J. Robert Oppenheimer, Frank Oppenheimer, Albert Einstein, Neils Bohr, Leo Szilard, Nicholas Kurti, David Bohm, Rudolf Peierls, Felix Bloch, Paul Wigner, James Chadwick, James Franck, Otto Frisch, Edward Teller, Hans Bethe, Klaus Fuchs, Dick Feynmann, Louis Slotin, Louis Rosen, Morris Kolodney, Ted Hall, Samuel Cohen, Jacob Beser, Samuel Goldsmit, George Placzek, Eugene Rabinowich, Gregory Breit, David Greenglass, Victor Weisskopf, Alvin Weinberg, Isidor Rabi, Joseph Rotblat, George Koval, Stan Frankel, Franz Simon, and David Lilienthal?

    Were they "white people"?

    Were they "white people" when they worked for Hitler?

    Were they "white people" when they spied for Stalin?

    Their intention was to drop the bomb on Nazis, which clears up the apparent contradiction right there.

    I remember reading that one of them, after the Nazis were out of the war and it was clear politicians were intent on dropping it on Japan, said something like, “My God, it’s as if these people actually *want* to use the thing.” Um, why did you build it for them if you didn’t want to use it?

    I realize the response would be, “Because we were afraid Nazis were going to invent it without us inventing it first.” Which was a reasonable fear. But come on, you wanted to drop it on Germany. Tell the truth.

    Anyway, they solved the mistake of giving Whitebread America the bomb by handing it over to the Evil Empire, which at least back in the day had a bunch of their people in charge.

    Read More
    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    "Anyway, they solved the mistake of giving Whitebread America the bomb by handing it over to the Evil Empire, which at least back in the day had a bunch of their people in charge."

    By the time they handed it over, their people were no longer in charge for years but whatever.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  249. Kevin C. says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    That's the problem that the Dems are running into these days. Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslims are demanding to be front and center in the party leadership and to be the candidates. White men, Jews and white women are being pushed out.

    It was one thing having Bill Clinton or Schumer or Biden chiding whites and talking about white privilege. It's another to have Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible.

    Obama got away with it in part because of his personality (a well-spoken black who frankly didn't act like other blacks) and in part because he was the first PoC to get elected to high office. But even his racial animus came out over time, and it rubbed whites the wrong way.

    Whites won't have as much patience the next time around, nor will the PoC messenger likely be as smooth as Obama.

    It's a major problem for the Dems. Luckily for them, the GOP would rather perish than stand up for whites so the Dems will be just fine because it's hard to lose if you don't have an opponent.

    Whites won’t have as much patience the next time around

    So we “lose patience.” So what? What can we do with that loss of patience except stew impotently in our anger and frustration? Elect more GOP Congress-critters who will, no matter what they say before the election, inevitably become a new batch of John McCains once in office? Because that’s what the job is: to put up a show of fighting the left, then valiantly lose, thereby maintaining the illusion that Congress actually matters or has any real power anymore, rather than being one of the empty, last remnants of the Old Republic? Electing another Trump, who will be just as ineffective against the Deep State as him, because the Deep State are our true, unelected rulers who do not answer to any president, who are more powerful than any president? The “swamp” is undrainable, because it has far more power than any would-be “drainer.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @JackOH
    "So we “lose patience.” So what? What can we do with that loss of patience except stew impotently in our anger and frustration?"

    Exactly, Kevin C., you nailed it. Despite the percolating and well-justified anger here over a host of bad policies we live under, the chances of us mounting a successful opposition are pretty damned slim. Successful, meaningful dissent is costly and hard.

    BTW-I don't really get the notion that you read in occasional comments here that, roughly speaking, abuses and excesses are to be welcomed because they'll more quickly lead to an uprising of ordinary folks seeking, er, uh, justice or a rectification of grievances. Our permanent masters are clever enough to back off when necessary.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  250. guest says:
    @AndrewR
    Lol. If leftists had any respect for reality, they wouldn't be leftists. But for reasons probably more complex than anyone may be aware of, Americans of all ethnicities tend to lump all Latinos together racially. And many white Latinos try to exploit this for their own benefit. See: Rubio, Little Marco

    “for reasons probably more complex…”

    No, they are garden-variety who/whom reasons.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Then explain.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  251. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    OT:

    Indian Man’s Parents Fly to Florida to Help Him Beat His Wife

    “Parents fly from their native India to Florida ‘to beat their son’s wife, 33, for being disobedient’ after he called them for help”

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4851918/Indian-man-s-parents-fly-Florida-beat-son-s-wife.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  252. Kevin C. says:
    @Jake
    I think your assessment is correct. Whites are the near antithesis of the people directly addressed in Matthew 7: 3-5. Jesus talks about people whose first, and perhaps nearly only, instinct is to focus on even the smallest problem with other folks, and batter them, while ignoring their own much worse faults.

    Whites, meaning in this case Gentiles of European background, tend to be as you note: led by overly socially fastidious women, they will browbeat their own for little motes while ignoring not merely beams, but beams with gigantic spikes smeared in feces, that protrude from the eyes of non-whites and non-Christians.

    Those whites are as screwed up and WRONG as are the people on the other end of the pendulum that Jesus specifically condemns. In fact, whites being this way make those people much worse.

    I think your assessment is correct. Whites are the near antithesis of the people directly addressed in Matthew 7: 3-5.

    Except, how much of white people being that way is due to the influence of Matthew 7: 3-5 and related?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  253. Thea says:
    @Pat Boyle
    I think all this naked hatred against whites is a big mistake for blacks. East Asians with some justice feel they are equal or superior so you don't get much contempt for white accomplishment from them. Hispanics want the goose that lays those golden eggs so they too are circumspect. But Americans blacks no longer bother too conceal their desire to slaughter all whites.

    Let's face it blacks have not worked out in America. Lincoln, Jefferson and Washington never could believe that blacks could ever be social equals to whites. As it turns out - they were right.

    Since the sixties America has embraced a kind of optimism about prospects for racial blending. But all the evidence for the success of racial equality is negative.

    There is a story earlier in this blog thread about America's opioid epidemic. It testifies to the hopelessness that young black men feel. I'm sure its correct. Probably the best way to interpret the black on black shooting that we see in Baltimore, Detroit and Chicago is that it is a new form of suicide - suicide by proxy. The social scientists refuse to believe it but the black kids in the ghetto know the odds against them ever becoming a normal member of society. So they shoot heroin into their arms and shoot their gun at other blacks.

    Meanwhile the white liberals and black militants become increasingly more strident. They have grants and maybe even tenure. They are a long way from the grim realities of street black life. So they indulge in nasty panegyrics against white people. They feel better for this. Most other blacks have no outlet for their frustration. They at least can scream.

    But hating whites is not cost-free. We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people. We know that the famous Nazi genocide of the Jews was done by white people. So no should doubt that whites can be very nasty indeed. It is in the best long term interest of blacks to cool it - to mollify whites and hope for some answer to emerge. The present course of white liberals and black radicals to spew undiluted hatred at whites looks to me to be another suicide gesture.

    Do Mestizos possess the same racial animus?

    I’m sure they’d fleece us but there doesn’t seem to be the same desire to spitefully rape, torture and kill us. Perhaps I’m wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  254. Felix... says:
    @Beckow

    "Tony Perez or Keith Ellison talking about black and Hispanic pride while telling working class whites that they are terrible.....Obama got away with it in part because of his personality"

     

    That's a very good analysis. It explains the liberal media hysteria - both Dems and GOP establishment are cornered. So they lash out.

    Trump shook the system that was already wobbly. It is not possible to put it back in the box. There are too many ambitious politicians who would pick up the same themes. The best establishment option would be a neutered Trump who betrays his voters.

    The progressives are not very good with numbers. It will be another 20-30 years before they would have the PoC coalition that they seem to think already exists. They live mainly in immigrant-heavy enclaves and, as all simple people, they extrapolate. The liberal dominance depended on pacified and disinterested white voting, that is gone. It is unlikely that even 40% of whites would vote for identity-obsessed Dems. People know when they are not liked. And most pro-Trump part of America are white High School students - they will soon start voting.

    How are Dem candidates going to address the massive white majority of 70-75%? Preaching and accusations, name calling and hatred are not going to get many white votes. Once society is polarized, the largest group prevails.

    The progressives are not very good with numbers. It will be another 20-30 years before they would have the PoC coalition that they seem to think already exists. They live mainly in immigrant-heavy enclaves and, as all simple people, they extrapolate. The liberal dominance depended on pacified and disinterested white voting, that is gone. It is unlikely that even 40% of whites would vote for identity-obsessed Dems. People know when they are not liked. And most pro-Trump part of America are white High School students – they will soon start voting.

    How are Dem candidates going to address the massive white majority of 70-75%? Preaching and accusations, name calling and hatred are not going to get many white votes. Once society is polarized, the largest group prevails.

    Texas and Florida. The PoC coalition you describe is already baked into those two states. It’s a mathematical certainty that with the passage of at most a decade both states will become irrevocably blue as old GOP Anglos die off and vibrant PoC reach voting age. Whites can win presidential elections with just one of those states if they can continue getting the rust belt, but with both Texas and Florida off the map there is no pathway to the presidency even if Washington state, Minnesota, Oregon and other unlikely-GOP but heavily white states swing right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beckow
    You say 10 years, I suggested 20-30 years. Both are guesses. You are right about Tx and Florida, it could snowball much faster there.

    But in shorter term, let's say up to 2024-8, the Dem strategy makes no sense. With a 70-75% white electorate, insulting and patronizing white working and middle classes is self-defeating. Dems are stuck: they cannot run an identity-driven POC, because they would lose. When societies get polarized, the largest and strongest group always prevails. But Dems cannot run anyone who POC identity crazies object to. There is a very small space in the middle there somewhere, maybe a unique candidate with a unique background and skills. The next 2-3 elections will still be decided by the majority whites. And if they wish they can prevent the demographic collapse. It would be hard and ugly, but they could still do it. Once Tx and Florida go the way of California, it will be too late.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  255. @Frau Katze
    Some fraction of Mexicans (I don't know the figures) are of 100% European descent.

    One of the blondest, as well as most beautiful, woman I ever knew was a Mexican. Not only naturally blond, but sky-blue eyes as well.
    When I first met her I asked her how long her family had been in Mexico, ecxpecting her to say that her parents had arrived from Germany in 1945.
    “450 years”, she said, “give or take a decade or two”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    It's a great story but I really doubt that it's true. To the extent that there are Germans in Mexico (and there are some, esp. German speaking Swiss Mennonites who pioneered the dairy industry in Mexico) they would mostly have arrived starting in the 19th century after the end of Spanish rule. I suppose this woman's story is possible but I would rate it as highly unlikely.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  256. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Pat Boyle
    I think all this naked hatred against whites is a big mistake for blacks. East Asians with some justice feel they are equal or superior so you don't get much contempt for white accomplishment from them. Hispanics want the goose that lays those golden eggs so they too are circumspect. But Americans blacks no longer bother too conceal their desire to slaughter all whites.

    Let's face it blacks have not worked out in America. Lincoln, Jefferson and Washington never could believe that blacks could ever be social equals to whites. As it turns out - they were right.

    Since the sixties America has embraced a kind of optimism about prospects for racial blending. But all the evidence for the success of racial equality is negative.

    There is a story earlier in this blog thread about America's opioid epidemic. It testifies to the hopelessness that young black men feel. I'm sure its correct. Probably the best way to interpret the black on black shooting that we see in Baltimore, Detroit and Chicago is that it is a new form of suicide - suicide by proxy. The social scientists refuse to believe it but the black kids in the ghetto know the odds against them ever becoming a normal member of society. So they shoot heroin into their arms and shoot their gun at other blacks.

    Meanwhile the white liberals and black militants become increasingly more strident. They have grants and maybe even tenure. They are a long way from the grim realities of street black life. So they indulge in nasty panegyrics against white people. They feel better for this. Most other blacks have no outlet for their frustration. They at least can scream.

    But hating whites is not cost-free. We know that the only people to ever drop an atomic device were white people. We know that the famous Nazi genocide of the Jews was done by white people. So no should doubt that whites can be very nasty indeed. It is in the best long term interest of blacks to cool it - to mollify whites and hope for some answer to emerge. The present course of white liberals and black radicals to spew undiluted hatred at whites looks to me to be another suicide gesture.

    So no should doubt that whites can be very nasty indeed.

    Oh man, no one with a thinking brain doubts that. We see it exhibited in its full glory, every day, in some corner of the world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  257. @Declane
    Just out of curiosity I googled the president of Mexico to see how white he looked. He looks as white as the average Italian-American in my neighborhood. It's funny how people talk about Mexicans and racism and all that without ever acknowledging that there are basically two races in Mexico - the ones with a drop of native blood and the ones with a bucket.

    But he is 5'7" so at least he shows his solidarity with his lessers by not reaching his full European height.

    Vicente Fox, Mexican president from 2000 to 2006 is 6’5”. He’s mighty white, too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  258. Vinteuil says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Steve Bannon, in his recent 60 mins interview,
     
    I'm glad somebody brought up this interview, because I need to unburden myself of a most disquieting sensation. I feel like I'm in The Twilight Zone whenever I hear people on our side talk about how wonderful that interview was, as if one morning I woke up the same and everybody else was different.

    A word to the wise here---that interview was atrocious. Steve Bannon comes across as an unhinged zealot: Bloodshot eyes, interruptive speech, delusions of grandeur. He seems to think he's still playing some sort of vital role within the Trump administration, although paradoxically from "outside" it. The fact of the matter, as is becoming quite clear, is just the opposite. Bannon was apparently always a marginal figure in Trump's circle and with Trump's increasingly establishment drift, there is no longer any use for him. This must have come as a blow to Bannon's ego. He once thought (and had many others thinking) that he was the indispensable architect of the victorious Trump movement. That idea has turned out to be largely a myth created by himself.

    In compensation, Bannon has taken to running Breitbart as if it were his own personal vanity site. The features now consist of basically two kinds: 1) Articles about Steve Bannon; and 2) Articles about articles about Steve Bannon. This is is recurring theme with Breitbart and is reminiscent of the turbo-gonzo days of Milo Yiannopoulos.

    What's worse is the actual content of Steve Bannon's vision for the country. He styles himself as a defender of "radical unity," meaning that Americans of every race, religion, and sexual orientation will find common cause in his program of economic nationalism.

    It is impossible to overstate how stupid that is. Replace economic nationalism with "muh free market" and there is nothing to distinguish this from the cuckservativism of DR3 and "enterprise zones," except that Bannon's version lacks the gibs and graft necessary to actually make the spoils system work.

    Steve Bannon is an epic failure as a statesman. Whether its his grandiose but inaccurate historiographies ("Firing James Comey was the worst mistake in modern political history") or his cowardly hypocrisy ("We committed the original sin of the Trump administration; we embraced the establishment"), he is an unstable, self-promoting, and self-aggrandizing lunatic who has no place anywhere near the corridors of power.

    “I feel like I’m in The Twilight Zone whenever I hear people on our side talk about how wonderful [Bannon's] interview was, as if one morning I woke up the same and everybody else was different.”

    Maybe your idea of what counts as “our side” isn’t very widely shared?

    “Bloodshot eyes” – agreed. He has a face made for radio. So what?

    “Bannon has taken to running Breitbart as if it were his own personal vanity site. The features now consist of basically two kinds: 1) Articles about Steve Bannon; and 2) Articles about articles about Steve Bannon.”

    This is a ridiculous falsehood, as even the most cursory visit to the site will reveal.

    “Replace economic nationalism with ‘muh free market’ and there is nothing to distinguish this from the cuckservativism of DR3 and ‘enterprise zones’…”

    Your point here is, as professional philosophers like to say, “under-described.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  259. guest says:
    @NickG

    Steve Bannon comes across as an unhinged zealot:

     

    Yup, to many that would never going to vote Trump. But then few normal - non political junkie - folks, especially swing voters, know who Bannon is!

    Steve Bannon is an epic failure as a statesman
     
    Yup I agree, and in the same vein our host here would be an epic failure transitioning to a career as a female ramp model. I suspect both Steve's share similar levels of expectation of success in each respective profession. Bannon was a behind the scenes geezer; he was never on the cards as a 'statesman'.

    Bannon is, no doubt, a pugnacious bombastic geezer. What his contribution to Trump's ideological underpinnings, or the campaign's against the odds success, is difficult to say on the level of the inside gen most of us here have. What we can say is that Bannon was billed as Trump's Campaign co-ordinator and contrary to most predictions, Trump won.

    Was he fired, was he pushed, did he flounce off, does he feel he can be more effective outside the administration....I suspect it's something of all 4. Does he still have Trump's ear...I suspect not directly.

    “our host here would be an epic failure transitioning to a career as a female ramp model”

    He would, because unfortunately he looks like a grown man instead of a pubescent boy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  260. res says:
    @Anonymous
    I don't quite see it as immigriping: a.) she says she's leaving (if only other immigripers would do the same); b.) she's not asking for special status or protection - she asks for rule of law.

    I think it is immigriping, but I agree with you that she is not showing the most pathological behaviors associated with it which you describe. Perhaps we need more detailed words? immidemanding might work conceptually, but it doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  261. Vinteuil says:
    @Jack D
    No, it is highly relevant. Russian, even today's rump Russia, is a multicultural society where you can be "Russian" by signing on to the great Russian statist project. Russia (and Putin is very typical in this regard) defines itself in OPPOSITION to the decadent West. If you are a Russian statist, you can be any culture or religion (although it certainly doesn't hurt to be Russian and Orthodox). If you oppose the Russian statist project then you are an enemy of Moscow and pure white Russian blood won't help you - watch out for Polonium in your tea.

    This article explains it:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/opinion/russia-putin-national-identity.html

    Americans always make the mistake of assuming that everyone thinks just like Americans. Putin is impossible to understand in American terms and not a good role model for American white nationalists because Russian history is not like American history and Russians are not Americans.

    “Putin is impossible to understand in American terms and not a good role model for American white nationalists because Russian history is not like American history and Russians are not Americans.”

    This seems right to me. The political situation in Russia is just too different from that in the USA to make any easy comparisons.

    I hope you’d agree that, just as it’s foolish for American nationalists to adopt Putin as a role model, it’s equally foolish – and far more dangerous, not to mention far more prevalent – for American globalists to demonize him.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  262. @Jack D
    Either math is not their strong suit or else they pretend it is not. They claim that they are practicing "positive" discrimination or just giving people a leg up (from FDR onward Democrats have been great at manipulating the language to make essentially Communist or Statist projects sound as American as apple pie - who could be against giving people a leg up?). The problem is that in many areas (e.g. college admissions) the # of seats, etc. is fixed in the short run so this is what is known as a "zero sum game" - if I "help" one person then I can only do so by "hurting" someone else but white people were not supposed to notice that they were on the losing end of the game. If you "noticed" this made you a "racist" so shut up, you racist. This is not really a recipe for winning love and affection - the beatings will continue until morale improves! And of course, they exempted themselves from their own rules - letting more blacks into Stanford did not mean that Chelsea couldn't attend, it meant that some farm boy from Iowa couldn't go.

    BTW, the Russian standard of living did improve under the Communists (except at the very end when things started to fall apart).

    A good chunk of this was probably the kind of wealth redistribution a thief gets from stealing a Faberge egg. Around the beginning of the decade, the top 20% of the population owned over 90% of the wealth. At the time of the October Revolution a century ago, the concentration was probably higher. As the benefits of purloined wealth dissipated, Russia began to see real privation. What better way to kill two birds with one stone than to eliminate the kulak wreckers, further down the wealth scale, via starvation, while paving the way for the repurposing of their lands? Then WWII made it possible to further whittle down the population to keep it well within Malthusian bounds.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  263. Vinteuil says:
    @Jack D
    No, it is highly relevant. Russian, even today's rump Russia, is a multicultural society where you can be "Russian" by signing on to the great Russian statist project. Russia (and Putin is very typical in this regard) defines itself in OPPOSITION to the decadent West. If you are a Russian statist, you can be any culture or religion (although it certainly doesn't hurt to be Russian and Orthodox). If you oppose the Russian statist project then you are an enemy of Moscow and pure white Russian blood won't help you - watch out for Polonium in your tea.

    This article explains it:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/opinion/russia-putin-national-identity.html

    Americans always make the mistake of assuming that everyone thinks just like Americans. Putin is impossible to understand in American terms and not a good role model for American white nationalists because Russian history is not like American history and Russians are not Americans.

    P.S. – I’d hope you’d also agree that Donald Trump has (or, at least, had) exactly the right instincts here: wouldn’t it be great if we could just get along with Russians, and cooperate with them when it’s to our mutual advantage? What possible advantage can ordinary Americans gain from a renewed cold war?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  264. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Guy de Champlagne
    Yeah Putin is such a great leader that he's almost gotten Russian life expectancy back up to soviet levels. What a man!

    Given what happened actually that is an achievement. He has a long way to go and he knows it, but he’s making progress. Only a really intelligent, ruthless, and inner-directed leader would get even that much.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Guy de Champlagne
    I thought the soviet union was supposed to be really terrible and inefficient. Surely improving on such a horrible government would be easy? The standard right wing knee jerk reactions are in conflict with one another.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  265. Currahee says:
    @Anonymous
    This picture is larger: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBapsirUMAAzdhs.jpg:large

    I don’t believe this photo is genuine. Give me proof as to source.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jackson
    Yes the photo is genuine. The program's Twitter account posted it June 2nd.

    https://twitter.com/LAPD_Cadets
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  266. Lex says:
    @Dr. X

    The idea that Putin is a committed ethnic nationalist is a useful myth both for the American left and for the weird white nationalist Putin fanboys who seem to believe it as well. The truth is Putin doesn’t give a damn about “white identity”, he is a statist.
     
    Yeah, but Putin is a "statist" in a lily-white country. Ergo, Russian nationalism is white Russian nationalism. You don't see him importing Syrians, Turks, Pakistanis and Africans like Merkel and May, do you?

    You see him importing Uzbeks and Tajiks though.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  267. benjaminl says:

    I still can’t quite believe this is the new Conventional Wisdom among the great and good:

    http://www.vulture.com/2017/09/david-lynch-racial-politics.html

    What Does David Lynch Have to Say About Race?
    In the filmmaker’s vision of America, whiteness is the source of all evil….

    [MORE]

    All of Lynch’s main characters are white: As far as American directors go, this is unexceptional, and it may well be the most normal thing about him. What is abnormal about Lynch’s films is the way he makes whiteness speak and turn its gaze upon itself. Very often, the crises that force his pale-faced leads to reveal their true nature are subtly and indelibly linked to the violence and discrimination that created and sustains their power, or in other words, whiteness….

    As someone (as a Frank, even) who writes regularly about black music, it’s long been evident that, however small or great, there will always be some measure of bad faith involved in taking pleasure in art whose beauty, though universal, is rooted in and channels a pain specific to the black experience; though I’m not white, have no wish to be, and benefit rather less from racial hierarchy than both whites and less discerning people of color imagine, the guilt is there all the same. …

    Both Hawk and Del Rio serve as persistent reminders of a reality overwritten by white conquest, adding a faint, but unmistakable, historical dimension to the return of the repressed that defines Lynch’s work. …

    When Lynch introduced FBI Agent Dale Cooper to the world, Cooper, to most viewers, seemed an update on an abiding legend white America had long repeated to itself….Much as Twin Peaks heralded the era of so-called prestige television shows, Cooper was the first, and most powerfully drawn, of the morally compromised white male anti-heroes at the center of those shows. He was the first to touch upon the crisis in whiteness and white masculinity that occasioned the appearance (and widespread appreciation) of Tony Soprano, Don Draper, and Walter White. …The fall of Cooper, the character closest to a Lynch self-portrait, cuts to the heart of his signature achievement as an artist. He has converted, by force if necessary, white Am