The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
We Need a National Holiday of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From the New York Times, a Thanksgiving sermon:

America: The Redeemer Nation

David Brooks NOV. 23, 2017

We once had a unifying national story, celebrated each Thanksgiving. It was an Exodus story. …

In one brilliant stroke, Lincoln deprives Christian politics of the chauvinism and white identitarianism that we see now on the evangelical right. He fills the vacuum of moral vision that we see now on the relativist left. He shows how American particularism always points to universalism — how the specific features of our settler’s history and culture point to vision of communion for all mankind.

Reading the columns of David Brooks, Bret “I have always thought of the United States as a country that belongs first to its newcomers” Stephens, and Roger Cohen, I now realize we should have a national holiday celebrating the immigration of their ancestors to the United States.

This National Day of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration might be the only hope of keeping them from trying so hard to convert every other American national holiday into an occasion for their own ethnocentric ancestor worship.

Worse, instead of frankly admitting that they really, really like their own kind, the Brookses, Stephens, and Cohens feel compelled to concoct elaborate globalist theories about why every single American national holiday is a mandate for letting in not just their forefathers, but every scimitar-waving Muslim on earth.

 
Hide 107 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    This National Day of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration might be the only hope of keeping them from trying so hard to convert every other American national holiday into an occasion for their own ethnocentric ancestor worship.

    We’ve already given them a history month. I doubt a holiday would quench their thirst.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Big Bill

    We once had a unifying national story, celebrated each Thanksgiving. It was an Exodus story. …
     
    ... immediately followed by ...

    American particularism always points to universalism — how the specific features of our settler’s history and culture point to vision of communion for all mankind
     
    . What kind of incoherent stuff is this?

    Exodus is the story of how God sent the Hebrews out to exterminate their neighbors--man, woman, child, dog, cat, everything -- and take their land. Race purity was so important to God that he ordered the execution of all Hebrew men who fornicated with captured slave women instead of butchering them.

    How in heaven's name does this naturally lead to kumbaya, gentle-Jesus-meek-and-mild universalism and self-extinction?

    No wonder these Galut nutcases are so freaking neurotic. Can you imagine the degree of cognitive dissonance that they must contain within their skulls to even put these two concepts in the same article, side-by-side? They are lucky their heads don't explode just walking down the street!

    No wonder Rabbi Tender calls them "neo-Christians". God help Israel if more of them make aliyah and keep expanding their universalist beachhead in their national homeland.
    , @Eustace Tilley (not)
    Pick one from a dozen and choose:
    Christ Peter, and May for the Jews.
    Antisemite remarks
    May 5th is for Marx,
    But Patriot "don't care what's whose".
    , @CopyBookGods
    The right framework for any discussion of Jewish behavior in America is Kevin MacDonalds
    "Cultural of Critique." Only MacDonald makes sense of otherwise baffling Jewish behavior, its aggressions, its insatiable need to control, adulterate, corrupt and and finally annihilate the larger surrounding culture, Behind every Jewish ploy using words like "tolerance", "caring" and of course "openness" is the real motive which is the destruction of white culture. There is no sense
    going to Brooks or his type with any off this. They barely know what they are doing themselves. They have been on automatic since before they can remember. Behavior they adopted by simply growing up Jewish . Don't judge them by their words, judge them by the results their so called charitable actions. The corruption and depravity spread by Hollywood, the mind control efforts of the Main Stream Media, the endless financial scams, and the the gutting of every once great Anglo institution, from Harvard to the Supreme Court. Jews study white mainstream culture as if under a microscope. Its perfectly fair to study them.
    , @Joe Franklin
    Holocaust Memorial Days are recognized by multiple nations, including the US:


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_Memorial_Days

    United States 8-day period, from the Sunday before Yom Hashoah to the Sunday after Yom Hashoah Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust (DRVH) Established by Congress as the period for remembrance programs and ceremonies.

     

    Holocaust Memorial Days are necessary to remind the public that Jewish people are full members and participants in the American diversity and inclusion scheme.

    The American diversity and inclusion scheme recognizes victim culture people's right to immigrate to the US under any and all conditions.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /isteve/we-need-a-national-holiday-of-adulation-and-gratitude-for-jewish-immigration/#comment-2091081
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Maybe there should just be a limit on the percentage of jews that can work in any given media organization? We could get the liberals to go along with it by setting the same limit for men. Just say neither group can be over represented by more than 2x their proportion in the national population.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    I find they throw gays in there now. They are gentiles/male, but generally have the same political outlook as stock Jewish radicals.

    The media, like academia, is gone. The owners control who gets hired and who gets visibility, so they effectively control the information flow. At some point it will have to be completely uprooted and rebuilt. I don't know how that will happen, but it's the only way at this point.
    , @El Dato
    Or go the other way; 33% Jewish, 33% SJW, 33% Diverse. Due to overlapping roles, you may need to top up with LBGTQWERTYS till 100% is reached.

    The resulting toxification will make a Hanford Nuclear Processing Leftover Tank Rupture look like a mundane event.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Ordnung says:

    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    Bret Stephens has admitted that he is 100% secular and Israel is, in effect, his ‘Jewish religion’. Yet this also shows the limits of those who try to understand Jewish behaviour solely through the religious lens. Jewish identity is ethnic and religious. If the latter is gone, the former always remains.

    As for Roger Cohen, he is a classic shoot-and-cry(to borrow the left’s rhetoric on Zionists) “liberal”. He is always agonising over Israel – but there is never anything Israel could do that would make him abandon it. He’s like the J Street “liberals” who keep claiming the 2SS is possible, even as settlements have long since passed the point of no return.

    All of this goes to show that ethnic identity never really goes away. You see this among non-Jews as well. Some of the most anti-white bigots are often some of the most (on the surface) assimilated minorities. For instance, many of those who come from muslim countries, their more pious brethren actually care less about race than the liberals.

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case with many Jews as well. Many Orthodox Jews probably don’t care about race that much, but the secular ones do, and are obsessed with defeating white America. Philip Roth’s career is a perfect example and Stephens/Brooks/Cohen are following in the same path. There are many others. So this seems to be a universal phenomenom, even if we notice it more among Jews because of their influence over immigration/identity debate, and their near-universal hostility towards white identity and massive hypocrisy on Israel etc.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    Read More
    • Agree: SMK
    • Replies: @Miro23

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.
     
    Almost through an accident of history, Anglo-America 1945 reached a level of power and wealth unseen in modern times with its economic rivals lying in ruins after WW2, and the dollar having the role of world's reserve currency. Only the Cold War kept it more or less focused, but when this was gone, the end of the millennium looked like a wild debt fueled party.

    In fact, after 1989 everything was out of control - borders, ethics, debt, special interests, minorities, corruption etc. in a true recreation of the collapsing Roman Empire or Weimar Germany.

    Imperial Rome and Weimar finally died in economic chaos with worthless currencies.

    , @syonredux

    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.
     
    I think that you are confusing Brooks with his first wife:

    Brooks met his first wife, the former Jane Hughes, while both were students at the University of Chicago. She converted to Judaism[90] and changed her given name to Sarah.[91] In November 2013, David and Sarah Brooks divorced.[92][93] In 2017, Brooks married his former research assistant, writer Anne Snyder.[94]
    According to The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, in a September 2014 interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Brooks said that his oldest son serves in the Israel Defense Forces.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brooks_(cultural_commentator)#Personal_life
    , @Sm Sung
    Cohen is the worst. The very definition of the rootless cosmopolitan, who alternately claims to be British, English, "Lithuanian South-African", American and doubtless in possession of Israeli citizenship as well.
    , @Johnny Smoggins
    "When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism."



    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this.

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we're fucked.
    , @Johann Ricke

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism.
     
    That doesn't seem right. Just about every advanced non-Western country on earth has abandoned its traditional heritage and culture in favor of Western mores. Take the countries of Northeast Asia - China, Japan and Korea. The absolute monarchies are a historical artifact. The legal codes are mostly taken from the West. The traditional clothing of each country is seen only in historical dramas. Prostitution, while not exactly prestigious, was once legal in all three countries before Western influence led to legal prohibition. The list goes on and on. The bottom line? Each of these countries has kept its language, modes of social interaction and cuisine. But all else has been swept away.
    , @Massimo Heitor

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.
     
    I'd agree with Johann Ricke, this isn't quite right. Every major civilization and people is eager to join the global economy and partake in shallow consumerism and build airports and commercialize. The people of Africa prefer cities, even cities like Kinshasa, and are eager to abandon their ancestral languages and tribal traditions. The strip malls with the giant parking lots are falling out of favor, but that's another topic entirely.

    I would say that every other major tribe + civilization seems to want to prefer their own tribe and grow themselves, and the European whites are the one that are morally forbidden from doing so.

    Humans do want a greater purpose beyond consumerism and working a job. Race and religion and nation have provided those purposes. Due to past horrors experienced in the name of race/religion/nationalism, those are taboo and suppressed, particularly to white Christians. It's good that we avoid the horrors of WWII and past religious wars, but it's bad that we've stripped major purpose and identity from white christians.
    , @SMK
    the only thing that unites leftists (gentile and Jewish) and Muslims is hatred of Europeans and Western Civilization, which is defined by "racism," slavery, colonialism, nativism, xenophobia, and now "Islamophobia." The only thing that unites Jews (leftist and "neocon") and Muslims is hatred of white gentiles and white gentile civilization, which is defined by centuries of Jew hatred that culminated in Nazism and the Holocaust. Only hatred unites groups of people who have little or nothing else in common and are natural and immutable enemies, such as Jews and Jew-hating Muslims. Combined with pro-immigration idealism and sentimentality that is passionately ethnocentric, only visceral hatred of white gentiles can explain why Jewish leftists and "neocons" not only support but celebrate an invasion of Jew-hating Muslim who desire to subjugate and persecute them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Dan Hayes says:

    Steve,

    Brooks once again deifies Lincoln – perhaps America’s preeminent War Criminal!

    P.S. A tardy Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family. And while I’m at it, to Ron who makes it all possible!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Dave Pinsen says: • Website

    Not a bad idea. Call it Sabin Day, and make it nominally August 26th, Albert Sabin‘s birthday, but have it observed the last Monday in August, so we get two long weekends in a row at the end of summer. Italians have Columbus Day, blacks have MLK Day: it wouldn’t be out of line for Jews to have Sabin Day.

    Read More
    • Agree: Desiderius
    • Replies: @Pericles
    Or make it Michael Milken Day on April 15th.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    A holiday? Why not just give them control of the mass media, major institutions, industries, finance, commercial real estate, government…hey wait a minute, I just looked this up on Google and it turns out it’s all a myth, propagated by a tiny coterie of anti-semites! Well, that’s a relief.

    Read More
    • LOL: reiner Tor
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. Moses says:

    Steve is on an especially good tear this week. Go Steve, go!

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Guy de Champlagne
    Maybe there should just be a limit on the percentage of jews that can work in any given media organization? We could get the liberals to go along with it by setting the same limit for men. Just say neither group can be over represented by more than 2x their proportion in the national population.

    I find they throw gays in there now. They are gentiles/male, but generally have the same political outlook as stock Jewish radicals.

    The media, like academia, is gone. The owners control who gets hired and who gets visibility, so they effectively control the information flow. At some point it will have to be completely uprooted and rebuilt. I don’t know how that will happen, but it’s the only way at this point.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. El Dato says:
    @Guy de Champlagne
    Maybe there should just be a limit on the percentage of jews that can work in any given media organization? We could get the liberals to go along with it by setting the same limit for men. Just say neither group can be over represented by more than 2x their proportion in the national population.

    Or go the other way; 33% Jewish, 33% SJW, 33% Diverse. Due to overlapping roles, you may need to top up with LBGTQWERTYS till 100% is reached.

    The resulting toxification will make a Hanford Nuclear Processing Leftover Tank Rupture look like a mundane event.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. El Dato says:

    OT: Open the cash spigot, we need more Twitter hasbara.

    RT vaguely reports UK warns East Europe against ‘hostile Russia,’ plans to spend £100mn to tackle ‘disinformation’

    Although details of May’s plans to counter Russia in the former Soviet Union republics have not been made public, London appears to be extremely motivated to lead the anti-Russian crusade in Europe, despite its Brexit blues.

    May further distanced rhetoric from fact when she stated that Moscow “will not succeed” in whatever it is doing and should not underestimate the stability and what she termed “the enduring attraction” of western society. In response to May’s torrent of “ideological clichés,” the head of Russia’s Federation Council Committee on Foreign Affairs, Konstantin Kosachev, said her “mistake is that this conflict is not ideological and there will be no ‘triumph of Western values’ this time, as no one is fighting them here.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. Miro23 says:
    @Ordnung
    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    Bret Stephens has admitted that he is 100% secular and Israel is, in effect, his 'Jewish religion'. Yet this also shows the limits of those who try to understand Jewish behaviour solely through the religious lens. Jewish identity is ethnic and religious. If the latter is gone, the former always remains.

    As for Roger Cohen, he is a classic shoot-and-cry(to borrow the left's rhetoric on Zionists) "liberal". He is always agonising over Israel - but there is never anything Israel could do that would make him abandon it. He's like the J Street "liberals" who keep claiming the 2SS is possible, even as settlements have long since passed the point of no return.

    All of this goes to show that ethnic identity never really goes away. You see this among non-Jews as well. Some of the most anti-white bigots are often some of the most (on the surface) assimilated minorities. For instance, many of those who come from muslim countries, their more pious brethren actually care less about race than the liberals.

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case with many Jews as well. Many Orthodox Jews probably don't care about race that much, but the secular ones do, and are obsessed with defeating white America. Philip Roth's career is a perfect example and Stephens/Brooks/Cohen are following in the same path. There are many others. So this seems to be a universal phenomenom, even if we notice it more among Jews because of their influence over immigration/identity debate, and their near-universal hostility towards white identity and massive hypocrisy on Israel etc.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    Almost through an accident of history, Anglo-America 1945 reached a level of power and wealth unseen in modern times with its economic rivals lying in ruins after WW2, and the dollar having the role of world’s reserve currency. Only the Cold War kept it more or less focused, but when this was gone, the end of the millennium looked like a wild debt fueled party.

    In fact, after 1989 everything was out of control – borders, ethics, debt, special interests, minorities, corruption etc. in a true recreation of the collapsing Roman Empire or Weimar Germany.

    Imperial Rome and Weimar finally died in economic chaos with worthless currencies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonguy

    Almost through an accident of history, Anglo-America 1945 reached a level of power and wealth unseen in modern times with its economic rivals lying in ruins after WW2, and the dollar having the role of world’s reserve currency. Only the Cold War kept it more or less focused, but when this was gone, the end of the millennium looked like a wild debt fueled party.

    In fact, after 1989 everything was out of control – borders, ethics, debt, special interests, minorities, corruption etc. in a true recreation of the collapsing Roman Empire or Weimar Germany.
     
    I agree 100%. The election of Trump and now sexual harassment scandal is people screaming that they are more than commodities/cattle/items. Unfortunately, that is all that globalism offers the individual, ultimately, you are nothing more than another bag of fritos on the production line.

    Globalism offers people nothing but consumerism, which is just sensualism/hedonism with a veneer of of justifications. Cows are well fed/tended before they are monetized too and nobody wants to be them.

    Anyhow, people want to believe in something, it will be interesting to see what they settle on this go round.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. eah says:
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    I wish these guys would exodus back to israel. :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rosamond Vincy
    Including Ron?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. J1234 says:

    In one brilliant stroke, Lincoln deprives Christian politics of the chauvinism and white identitarianism that we see now on the evangelical right. He fills the vacuum of moral vision that we see now on the relativist left.

    WTF? Are we talking about the same Lincoln? The one who disliked slavery because it lead to interracial sex? The one that wanted to send the blacks back to Africa until
    A) it became impractical logistically, financially and (after emancipation) legally…and
    B) he realized they could vote for him in the next election?

    He shows how American particularism always points to universalism — how the specific features of our settler’s history and culture point to vision of communion for all mankind.

    Even among people who should know better, history has become nothing more than a bunch of ink blots upon which we can project whatever poetic notion resides in our hearts at the moment. Brooks is exhibiting symptoms of Barrack Obama-itis; the truth is an improvisational art form, like jazz. The truth is an apparition that visits us whenever we conjure up grandiose platitudes. Stop trying to win a Pulitzer, David.

    Read More
    • Agree: TTSSYF
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. JimWalker says:

    I have heard Bret Stephens speak twice. He was not like this before Trump.

    Read More
    • Replies: @3g4me
    @15 JimWalker: "I have heard Bret Stephens speak twice. He was not like this before Trump."

    I highly doubt his contempt for White Americans and his extreme ethnocentrism were "triggered" by Trump. Perhaps you ought to reexamine his earlier writings and/or speeches with a critical rather than adulatory eye. Merely because you were unaware of his deeply-held biases earlier does not mean they did not exist.
    , @Peripatetic commenter
    Late onset Trump Derangement Syndrome?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Pericles says:
    @Dave Pinsen
    Not a bad idea. Call it Sabin Day, and make it nominally August 26th, Albert Sabin's birthday, but have it observed the last Monday in August, so we get two long weekends in a row at the end of summer. Italians have Columbus Day, blacks have MLK Day: it wouldn't be out of line for Jews to have Sabin Day.

    Or make it Michael Milken Day on April 15th.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Mr. Anon says:

    Reading the columns of David Brooks, Bret “I have always thought of the United States as a country that belongs first to its newcomers” Stephens, and Roger Cohen, I now realize we should have a national holiday celebrating the immigration of their ancestors to the United States.

    To an outside eye, Judaism often seems to be a form of ancestor-worship. And paens to universalism by jewish chauvinists are striking for their hypocrisy; there are few modern major religions that are less universalist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. syonredux says:
    @Ordnung
    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    Bret Stephens has admitted that he is 100% secular and Israel is, in effect, his 'Jewish religion'. Yet this also shows the limits of those who try to understand Jewish behaviour solely through the religious lens. Jewish identity is ethnic and religious. If the latter is gone, the former always remains.

    As for Roger Cohen, he is a classic shoot-and-cry(to borrow the left's rhetoric on Zionists) "liberal". He is always agonising over Israel - but there is never anything Israel could do that would make him abandon it. He's like the J Street "liberals" who keep claiming the 2SS is possible, even as settlements have long since passed the point of no return.

    All of this goes to show that ethnic identity never really goes away. You see this among non-Jews as well. Some of the most anti-white bigots are often some of the most (on the surface) assimilated minorities. For instance, many of those who come from muslim countries, their more pious brethren actually care less about race than the liberals.

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case with many Jews as well. Many Orthodox Jews probably don't care about race that much, but the secular ones do, and are obsessed with defeating white America. Philip Roth's career is a perfect example and Stephens/Brooks/Cohen are following in the same path. There are many others. So this seems to be a universal phenomenom, even if we notice it more among Jews because of their influence over immigration/identity debate, and their near-universal hostility towards white identity and massive hypocrisy on Israel etc.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    I think that you are confusing Brooks with his first wife:

    Brooks met his first wife, the former Jane Hughes, while both were students at the University of Chicago. She converted to Judaism[90] and changed her given name to Sarah.[91] In November 2013, David and Sarah Brooks divorced.[92][93] In 2017, Brooks married his former research assistant, writer Anne Snyder.[94]
    According to The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, in a September 2014 interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Brooks said that his oldest son serves in the Israel Defense Forces.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brooks_(cultural_commentator)#Personal_life

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Man From K Street
    "writer Anne Snyder" however, is a 'left evangelical', and it is because of her influence that the rumors of Brooks' conversion *from* Judaism have spread.

    Unfortunately, Snyder's form of non-mainline Protestant Christianity is the kind of thoroughly cucked variety that promotes open borders as the highest Gospel value, and does transracial adoption to an extent you never see even among liberal mainline Protestants. Out of the frying pan and into the fire...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Emma Lazurus Day

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Even allowing for the low standards which currently obtain, it's astonishing how many misspellings they managed to fit into that graphic.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. syonredux says:

    We once had a unifying national story, celebrated each Thanksgiving. It was an Exodus story. Americans are the people who escaped oppression, crossed a wilderness and are building a promised land.

    Yes, and who were those people who started that story…..

    What could now sustain them but the spirit of God & His grace? May not & ought not the children of these fathers, rightly say: Our fathers were Englishmen which came over this great ocean, and were ready to perish in this wilderness

    William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation

    Oh, yeah, that’s right, they were Protestant Englishmen….

    The Puritans brought this story with them.

    Well, to be technical, it was the Pilgrims, not the Puritans….and they didn’t bring the tale with them….they created it…

    Each wave of immigrants saw themselves in this story.

    Mexicans see themselves in that story? That’s a new one on me….

    The narratives that appeal today are predicated on division and disappointment. The multicultural narrative, dominant in every schoolhouse, says that America is divided into different biological groups and the status of each group is defined by the oppression that it has suffered.

    Pretty accurate….

    The populist narrative, dominant in the electorate, says that America is divided between the virtuous common people and the corrupt and stupid elites.

    Not so accurate. The “populist” narrative sees the elites (correctly) as corrupt and foolish, not corrupt and stupid. Fools can be smart….

    Today, we have no common national narrative, no shared way of interpreting the flow of events. Without a common story, we don’t know what our national purpose is. We have no common set of goals or ideals.

    And why would that be…..What has happened to the USA since, oh, 1965 that has caused the old myths to no longer function…..

    We need a new national narrative.

    You know, because the old one only worked when America was a European nation….we gotta have something that appeals to the Muslims and the Latinx

    We are good to our enemies after wartime. After the revolution, we quickly became allies with Britain.

    Depends on your definition of “quick,” I suppose….the Revolution ended in 1783….but tensions remained fairly high until 1815….you know, after that 1812 business that I’m sure you read about in High School….

    After World War I, Woodrow Wilson was humane to our European enemies.

    Whatever you say, Dave…..

    After World War II, America generously rebuilt Germany and Japan.

    Nope. The USA helped them rebuild themselves. Thinking that the USA rebuilt Germany and Japan helped lead to that whole invasion and occupation of Iraq insanity (“See, we can do to Iraq what we did to Germany and Japan. What, you don’t think that that the Iraqis are just like the Germans and the Japanese? What are you, some kind of racist?”)

    Elsewhere, enmities last for centuries. But not here. Why? Because we have a national predilection for fresh starts.

    So, come on, let’s just start over and forget the last four hundred years of Anglo-American history…

    In the 20th, America partially healed the divisions between democracy and totalitarianism.

    What the hell does that mean? Seriously, can someone help me out with that one?

    He combines Christian redemption with the multiculturalist’s love of diversity.

    Where does that happen in the Second Inaugural?Are we reading the same speech? Here’s the whole thing. Can someone point to the hitherto undetected paean to multiculturalism contained therein?’Cause I’m not seeing it. Maybe you can only see it if you’ve been trained in Pilpul :

    Fellow-Countrymen:
    At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.
    On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.
    One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. “Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh.” If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”

    With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.[7]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. AndrewR says:

    You’ve got to admit that scimitars are pretty badass.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Buzz Mohawk
    Emma Lazurus Day

    https://i.pinimg.com/736x/d3/fa/95/d3fa95f6d5f2c7418386e49f6797374a.jpg

    Even allowing for the low standards which currently obtain, it’s astonishing how many misspellings they managed to fit into that graphic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    Accuracy is antithetical to Emma Lazarus Day.

    Wow, the spelling is awful, now that you mention it. Even LazUrus is wrong, which I of course dutifully copied.

    Nevertheless, I think on the Friday after Thanksgiving we should celebrate those toasted masses that washed up on our teams of shores where they could have free breaths.

    Bartholdi himself inscribed this in the base of the statue with a Dremel tool.

    Please pass the leftover stuffing. Hey, this is the perfect day for this holiday: we eat yesterday's food and we honor those who came to dinner late, after it had already been created, cooked and conveniently left in the fridge by those who came before them.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Ben Judah (author of the much feted celebration of mass immigration “This is London”) thinks that reading Orwell is Bad for the Jews:

    https://www.the-american-interest.com/2017/11/20/ive-enough-george-orwell/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    And in a webzine called The American Interest. Funny - I'm an American, and I didn't see a single article there that advocated anything that is in my interest or in the interest of anyone I know.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Tiny Duck says:

    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege? Society isn’t fair and Leople of Color have to work 10 times as hard to be thought of as a tenth as good

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege? Society isn’t fair and Leople of Color have to work 10 times as hard to be thought of as a tenth as good
     
    I love you, Tiny D*ck. I check my lrivilege at the door, and I don't allow Leople in my house. They have a disease, you know. They are reprllent.
    , @fish
    Ohs Tinys......doze po “Leoples O Colur”....deys alwys bein dancin bakwurds never getsin no kredits fo doozin it!

    Lezurd “Teh koreogrfir” piTTTz
    , @ThreeCranes
    Tiny says that people of color are only a tenth as good even when they work ten times harder.

    1/10th of 1/10th = 1/100th. That's harsh Tiny. Even slaveowners thought of blacks as being worth more than that, 3/5ths of a white man.
    , @AnotherDad

    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege?
     
    Absolutely! My ancestors crossed the ocean in tiny ships, to eek out a living in a new world, while staving off the Indians; they defeated the powerful British in battle; they fought their way across the mountains; felled trees, pulled stumps, busted sod to scratch out a living on the prairie; they defended their nation in war and built it in peace. They built the best damn nation the world had ever seen, so that their children, and their children's children, children, children would live in prosperity and freedom.

    You've damn sure right I accept my unearned privilege! My ancestors earned it for me. And i'm pretty pissed off assholes are trying to steal it and keep me from passing it on to my children.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. rogue-one says:

    “mandate for letting in not just their forefathers, but every scimitar-waving Muslim on earth.”

    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn’t ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    their ancient ethnic enemy

    Not ancient and not enemy. Who was running slavery business for Muslims in the middle ages in Europe? Ask Spaniards on which side Jews were during Reconquista?
    , @Meimou
    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn’t ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.

    Why did the scorpion sting the frog? Even if eskimos knew that the scimitar waving muzzies were going to kill them many would still want them here. The instinct to kill the host doesn't dissappear because you know that the host death will result in yours.

    Some Eskimos don't have this instinct, some have it, but have a stronger instinct for self preservation(Michael Savage), and there are some who possess this destructive instinct and think they will be immune from the effects of muzzi immigration.
    , @AnotherDad

    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn’t ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.
     
    Fix your faulty premise and you've got your answer:

    The Jews' "ancient enemy" isn't the muzzies it is the Christians. Christianity is the apostasy that got mindspace from the rabbis to the extent of Talmudic attack. And obviously European Christians are the "other" that the Ashkenazi were in contention with for two millennia, and the Ashkenazi--who middle-manned on top of European white societies and thus have higher IQs--are smarter, more numerous and simply dominate Jewish obsessions.

    The Muslims' ancient enemy is the Christians. The Muslims quickly expanded out of Arabia and were immediately in contention with Christian societies which has continued for the next 1300+ years. And despite a great deal of initial success turned back by our man Chuck at Tours, and continual incursions for centuries by the Ottomans, the last few centuries have seen them continually defeated and humiliated by the superiority of the West.

    Jews are certainly way up on the muzzies enemies list since the founding of Israel. And there's no doubt that current Jewish policies in the West that sure don't seem to be rationally in their long term interest . But Jews have obsessions when it comes to European gentiles that are beyond reason.
    , @Rosamond Vincy
    You got there first. My doctor, a nice Jewish man, told me he was voting for Trump based in no small part on events in France, England, and Germany, but couldn't admit it publicly.
    I'll bet there are others, even if the multiculti invade/invite types are louder.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Sm Sung says:
    @Ordnung
    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    Bret Stephens has admitted that he is 100% secular and Israel is, in effect, his 'Jewish religion'. Yet this also shows the limits of those who try to understand Jewish behaviour solely through the religious lens. Jewish identity is ethnic and religious. If the latter is gone, the former always remains.

    As for Roger Cohen, he is a classic shoot-and-cry(to borrow the left's rhetoric on Zionists) "liberal". He is always agonising over Israel - but there is never anything Israel could do that would make him abandon it. He's like the J Street "liberals" who keep claiming the 2SS is possible, even as settlements have long since passed the point of no return.

    All of this goes to show that ethnic identity never really goes away. You see this among non-Jews as well. Some of the most anti-white bigots are often some of the most (on the surface) assimilated minorities. For instance, many of those who come from muslim countries, their more pious brethren actually care less about race than the liberals.

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case with many Jews as well. Many Orthodox Jews probably don't care about race that much, but the secular ones do, and are obsessed with defeating white America. Philip Roth's career is a perfect example and Stephens/Brooks/Cohen are following in the same path. There are many others. So this seems to be a universal phenomenom, even if we notice it more among Jews because of their influence over immigration/identity debate, and their near-universal hostility towards white identity and massive hypocrisy on Israel etc.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    Cohen is the worst. The very definition of the rootless cosmopolitan, who alternately claims to be British, English, “Lithuanian South-African”, American and doubtless in possession of Israeli citizenship as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @Ordnung
    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    Bret Stephens has admitted that he is 100% secular and Israel is, in effect, his 'Jewish religion'. Yet this also shows the limits of those who try to understand Jewish behaviour solely through the religious lens. Jewish identity is ethnic and religious. If the latter is gone, the former always remains.

    As for Roger Cohen, he is a classic shoot-and-cry(to borrow the left's rhetoric on Zionists) "liberal". He is always agonising over Israel - but there is never anything Israel could do that would make him abandon it. He's like the J Street "liberals" who keep claiming the 2SS is possible, even as settlements have long since passed the point of no return.

    All of this goes to show that ethnic identity never really goes away. You see this among non-Jews as well. Some of the most anti-white bigots are often some of the most (on the surface) assimilated minorities. For instance, many of those who come from muslim countries, their more pious brethren actually care less about race than the liberals.

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case with many Jews as well. Many Orthodox Jews probably don't care about race that much, but the secular ones do, and are obsessed with defeating white America. Philip Roth's career is a perfect example and Stephens/Brooks/Cohen are following in the same path. There are many others. So this seems to be a universal phenomenom, even if we notice it more among Jews because of their influence over immigration/identity debate, and their near-universal hostility towards white identity and massive hypocrisy on Israel etc.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    “When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism.”

    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this.

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we’re fucked.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    Chapeau !, you sir know what you are talking about.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro jazz ariist.

    , @anonymous

    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism.
     
    You mean the religion that defended Europe,launched the Crusades, burned witches and inspired its adherents to settle the New World and convert the natives?
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we’re fucked.
     
    Because whites haven't accomplished a damned thing since 33 AD. Excuse me, BCE.

    But don't worry. Harry Truman, who said in 1947 that America was a Christian nation, pretty much proved beyond rebuttal in 1945 that we were no such thing.

    Of course, you have no problem with the mass firebombing of women and children, unlike those weak and feminine Christian men, the Teddy Roosevelts, the Charles Martels, the Sts George.

    , @Man of the West
    "Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this"

    An absolutely foolish comment. When Christianity was at its strongest in Europe, Christians had no problem dealing with Jews, being ethnicallly strong, and repelling Islamic invaders to boot (Reconquista, Crusades, Lepanto, Vienna, Malta, etc.). Only once Europe become more and more secularized did these problems and weaknesses set in in force. If anything, this is a problem of a lack of robust historic Christianity in Europe, not because of it.
    , @Rosamond Vincy
    Even if you do not believe in Jesus, how do you call him a con-man? What did he get but torture and death?
    You do realize, the Garden of Gethsemane opened onto the desert. He could have strolled off and hid out for days until they got tired of looking. He didn't.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Big Bill says:
    @anonymous

    This National Day of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration might be the only hope of keeping them from trying so hard to convert every other American national holiday into an occasion for their own ethnocentric ancestor worship.
     
    We've already given them a history month. I doubt a holiday would quench their thirst.

    We once had a unifying national story, celebrated each Thanksgiving. It was an Exodus story. …

    … immediately followed by …

    American particularism always points to universalism — how the specific features of our settler’s history and culture point to vision of communion for all mankind

    . What kind of incoherent stuff is this?

    Exodus is the story of how God sent the Hebrews out to exterminate their neighbors–man, woman, child, dog, cat, everything — and take their land. Race purity was so important to God that he ordered the execution of all Hebrew men who fornicated with captured slave women instead of butchering them.

    How in heaven’s name does this naturally lead to kumbaya, gentle-Jesus-meek-and-mild universalism and self-extinction?

    No wonder these Galut nutcases are so freaking neurotic. Can you imagine the degree of cognitive dissonance that they must contain within their skulls to even put these two concepts in the same article, side-by-side? They are lucky their heads don’t explode just walking down the street!

    No wonder Rabbi Tender calls them “neo-Christians”. God help Israel if more of them make aliyah and keep expanding their universalist beachhead in their national homeland.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Curle
    “It was an Exodus story.”

    One imagines the writers of this piffle are blind to the detail that the Puritans were enthusiastically aided in their removal to the New World by a people, the British, desperate to be rid of them. Exodus is typically presented as an escape from captivity rather than a going away party.
    , @Peripatetic commenter

    Exodus is the story of how God sent the Hebrews out to exterminate their neighbors–man, woman, child, dog, cat, everything — and take their land. Race purity was so important to God that he ordered the execution of all Hebrew men who fornicated with captured slave women instead of butchering them.
     
    I guess they can't really complain about what happened to the Native Americans in that case.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Dr. X says:

    We once had a unifying national story, celebrated each Thanksgiving. It was an Exodus story…

    Ummm… no. The Book of Exodus tells us that the god of the Jews murdered the Egyptian babies in their cradles, and then he murdered the entire Egyptian army by drowning them in the Red Sea. All to help his Chosen People, of course.

    I don’t recall Americans using Thanksgiving to celebrate how God personally murdered our enemies on our behalf…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. @syonredux

    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.
     
    I think that you are confusing Brooks with his first wife:

    Brooks met his first wife, the former Jane Hughes, while both were students at the University of Chicago. She converted to Judaism[90] and changed her given name to Sarah.[91] In November 2013, David and Sarah Brooks divorced.[92][93] In 2017, Brooks married his former research assistant, writer Anne Snyder.[94]
    According to The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, in a September 2014 interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Brooks said that his oldest son serves in the Israel Defense Forces.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brooks_(cultural_commentator)#Personal_life

    “writer Anne Snyder” however, is a ‘left evangelical’, and it is because of her influence that the rumors of Brooks’ conversion *from* Judaism have spread.

    Unfortunately, Snyder’s form of non-mainline Protestant Christianity is the kind of thoroughly cucked variety that promotes open borders as the highest Gospel value, and does transracial adoption to an extent you never see even among liberal mainline Protestants. Out of the frying pan and into the fire…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. @anonymous

    This National Day of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration might be the only hope of keeping them from trying so hard to convert every other American national holiday into an occasion for their own ethnocentric ancestor worship.
     
    We've already given them a history month. I doubt a holiday would quench their thirst.

    Pick one from a dozen and choose:
    Christ Peter, and May for the Jews.
    Antisemite remarks
    May 5th is for Marx,
    But Patriot “don’t care what’s whose”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. anonguy says:
    @Miro23

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.
     
    Almost through an accident of history, Anglo-America 1945 reached a level of power and wealth unseen in modern times with its economic rivals lying in ruins after WW2, and the dollar having the role of world's reserve currency. Only the Cold War kept it more or less focused, but when this was gone, the end of the millennium looked like a wild debt fueled party.

    In fact, after 1989 everything was out of control - borders, ethics, debt, special interests, minorities, corruption etc. in a true recreation of the collapsing Roman Empire or Weimar Germany.

    Imperial Rome and Weimar finally died in economic chaos with worthless currencies.

    Almost through an accident of history, Anglo-America 1945 reached a level of power and wealth unseen in modern times with its economic rivals lying in ruins after WW2, and the dollar having the role of world’s reserve currency. Only the Cold War kept it more or less focused, but when this was gone, the end of the millennium looked like a wild debt fueled party.

    In fact, after 1989 everything was out of control – borders, ethics, debt, special interests, minorities, corruption etc. in a true recreation of the collapsing Roman Empire or Weimar Germany.

    I agree 100%. The election of Trump and now sexual harassment scandal is people screaming that they are more than commodities/cattle/items. Unfortunately, that is all that globalism offers the individual, ultimately, you are nothing more than another bag of fritos on the production line.

    Globalism offers people nothing but consumerism, which is just sensualism/hedonism with a veneer of of justifications. Cows are well fed/tended before they are monetized too and nobody wants to be them.

    Anyhow, people want to believe in something, it will be interesting to see what they settle on this go round.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Anonymous • Disclaimer says: • Website

    As personally 1 of them, I cringe in reading this trio and cringe again in reading the less thoughtful comments here. I have no reason to believe other than that all 3 hold their beliefs NOT as jews but as SOP goodthink Zeitgeist children. I am as a convinced Zionist as any of them, wishing only the best for plucky little Israel, albeit passively, but am as patriotic an American as anyone here, where the flag in some contexts makes my throat constrict and hearing the Star-Spangled Banner has the same Pavlov dog emotional response as anyone else’s. I don’t care how many jews you can name in the talking-head business in the pro-immigrant camp because by analogy I know that I have arrived at my political beliefs by thinking about them and reaching certain conclusions. I challenge you to show me evidence that this execrable trio arrived at their convictions otherwise than thinking about them and drawing conclusions. Are you going to tell me that there is a genetic component to their mentation? That they are witting or unwitting agents of a cabal? Are you going to blow off my jewy argument because you harbor prejudice?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moses
    Yes, but is it good for the Jews?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Abraham Lincoln also said:

    Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people. As long as blacks continue to live with the whites they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of mixed breed bastards may some day challenge the supremacy of the white man.

    I’m sure Brooks has seen this, but people of his ilk, can just edit out quotes that don’t paint the picture he wants to paint.

    Emma Lazarus also was particularly passionate about Jewish immigration, not any immigration. She advocated for the creation of a Jewish homeland that excluded non-Jews. She helped establish the Hebrew Technical Institute. Yet her legacy is twisted into one of non-tribal preference.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Faraday's Bobcat
    Lincoln never said that. It was in a letter written to him.

    https://quod.lib.umich.edu/a/alajournals/0599998.0006.003?view=text&seq=40
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @Ordnung
    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    Bret Stephens has admitted that he is 100% secular and Israel is, in effect, his 'Jewish religion'. Yet this also shows the limits of those who try to understand Jewish behaviour solely through the religious lens. Jewish identity is ethnic and religious. If the latter is gone, the former always remains.

    As for Roger Cohen, he is a classic shoot-and-cry(to borrow the left's rhetoric on Zionists) "liberal". He is always agonising over Israel - but there is never anything Israel could do that would make him abandon it. He's like the J Street "liberals" who keep claiming the 2SS is possible, even as settlements have long since passed the point of no return.

    All of this goes to show that ethnic identity never really goes away. You see this among non-Jews as well. Some of the most anti-white bigots are often some of the most (on the surface) assimilated minorities. For instance, many of those who come from muslim countries, their more pious brethren actually care less about race than the liberals.

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case with many Jews as well. Many Orthodox Jews probably don't care about race that much, but the secular ones do, and are obsessed with defeating white America. Philip Roth's career is a perfect example and Stephens/Brooks/Cohen are following in the same path. There are many others. So this seems to be a universal phenomenom, even if we notice it more among Jews because of their influence over immigration/identity debate, and their near-universal hostility towards white identity and massive hypocrisy on Israel etc.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism.

    That doesn’t seem right. Just about every advanced non-Western country on earth has abandoned its traditional heritage and culture in favor of Western mores. Take the countries of Northeast Asia – China, Japan and Korea. The absolute monarchies are a historical artifact. The legal codes are mostly taken from the West. The traditional clothing of each country is seen only in historical dramas. Prostitution, while not exactly prestigious, was once legal in all three countries before Western influence led to legal prohibition. The list goes on and on. The bottom line? Each of these countries has kept its language, modes of social interaction and cuisine. But all else has been swept away.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    They've kept their demographics, and can determine their laws and culture however they wish.
    , @MadDog
    Unlike the West, the Asians kept their people. That's a big difference. They may dress like the Europeans, but they haven't adopted the suicidal ideology that immigration is good. Asians don't accept the Other. Good for them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Svigor says:

    Thanksgiving and Christmas are confusing times for Jews. They think they are God’s gift…

    “Wow, this place is total shit. You’re lucky we’re finally here. We are gonna totally transform this place, it’s gonna be wonderful. Jews are unfathomably fabulous, you know.”

    100 years later:

    “This place was total shit. You’re lucky we came. If we hadn’t totally transformed this place, it would still be complete shit. You’re lucky Jews are so unfathomably fabulous.”

    Can’t figure out why they have to buy all their PR…

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity.

    Indeed, I’ve long felt there’s a retaliatory aspect to Jews’ kulturkampf. European greatness destroyed the Jewish delusion of a Judeocentric Universe, European openness drew the Jews out of their ghettos and shtetls, etc. And subconsciously unorthodox Jews feel as though if they had to give up their True Religion in the face of modernity, well, by G-d, the goyim sure aren’t going to be allowed to keep their false religion. Same goes for racial sentiment; if Jews don’t get to crow their obvious racial supremacy loudly, have to keep mum about it, then the goyim sure as Hell don’t get to have any racial sentiment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. Whiskey says: • Website

    This is not a Jewish thing. You are confusing the logs bobbing about in the River for the Current. Rather, it is the confluence of:

    A. Feminism and Civil Rights moving to purge a critical mass of Straight White Males (the legacy of Martin Luther King and Susan B. Anthony) to enable a new aristocracy of White women and non-Whites as rulers hostile to the old rulers, people, and history.

    B. Virtue signaling and desperation for acceptance by White men hanging on, this includes non-Jews and Jews alike in managerial and media positions.

    Really this is the function of demographics: Whites are functionally a minority in this country and a despised one; and White women on a feminist rage streak which they’ve been since Susan B. Anthony on revulsion for White straight beta males; automatically siding with whatever non-White male faction seems the most dominant and tingle inducing. About 75% of the Poz, minimum, is the result of female rage fueled by White men being their equals and not superiors. Even Matthew Weiner understood that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AnotherDad

    This is not a Jewish thing. You are confusing the logs bobbing about in the River for the Current. Rather, it is the confluence of:
     
    Please Whiskey stop before you hurt yourself.

    Yes, there is a "woman problem" that's a big element of the crisis in the West. That problem can largely be summed up by "church ladies". Or more tediously "virtue signaling church ladies not properly controlled and disciplined by traditional men."

    But Susan B. Anthony wasn't cheerleading the importation of Somalis to the heartland. (Her attitude in fact would have been quite the reverse.) Most white gentile women are not--how to put this politely--"deep thinkers" or "intellectuals" or "ideologues". They are lemming like followers of the reigning orthodoxy. Which for the church ladies of old was Christian virtue. And which for the church ladies of today is whatever the heck is on the Today Show. Or PBS. Or what their sociology professor told them. That reigning ideology--"minoritarianism" to stamp one word on all the various stupidities--is in not a creation of white gentiles, much less white gentile women.
    , @Moses

    Virtue signaling and desperation for acceptance by White men hanging on, this includes non-Jews and Jews alike in managerial and media positions.
     
    Fellow White Men.
    , @anonymous

    and White women on a feminist rage streak which they’ve been since Susan B. Anthony on revulsion for White straight beta males;
     
    Don't you dare attempt to conflate Susan B. Anthony with the third wave feminism of your sisters. It's not even remotely the same thing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Anonymous
    Even allowing for the low standards which currently obtain, it's astonishing how many misspellings they managed to fit into that graphic.

    Accuracy is antithetical to Emma Lazarus Day.

    Wow, the spelling is awful, now that you mention it. Even LazUrus is wrong, which I of course dutifully copied.

    Nevertheless, I think on the Friday after Thanksgiving we should celebrate those toasted masses that washed up on our teams of shores where they could have free breaths.

    Bartholdi himself inscribed this in the base of the statue with a Dremel tool.

    Please pass the leftover stuffing. Hey, this is the perfect day for this holiday: we eat yesterday’s food and we honor those who came to dinner late, after it had already been created, cooked and conveniently left in the fridge by those who came before them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @englishmike

    we should celebrate those toasted masses
     
    Moderately amusing. But "tost" is not "toast"; nor is it a modern misspelling. It is a literary or poetic rendering of "tossed" which the author used in her 1883 handwritten original manuscript. In a similar way, "blest" has been used for "blessed" (by John Milton, for example).

    Nevertheless, I am not an admirer of Emma Lazarus's virtue-signalling reinterpretation of the Preamble to the Constitution. As Vox Day and Red Eagle explain in Cuckservative: How "Conservatives" Betrayed America:

    The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America contains an extremely important phrase that is almost always ignored by those who appeal to it, or to the men who wrote it, in defense of immigration. It states:

    We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    The key phrase is this: “to ourselves and our posterity.” The blessings of liberty are not to be secured to all the nations of the world, to the tired and huddled masses, or to the wretched refuse of the teeming shores of other lands. They are to be secured to our children, and their children, and their children’s children.

    To sacrifice their interests to the interests of children in other lands is to betray both past and future America. It is to permit an alien posterity, like the newly hatched cuckoo in another bird’s nest, to eliminate our own, and in doing so, defeat the purpose of the Constitution. It is, like the cuckolded husband, to raise the children of another man instead of one’s own sons and daughters.

    It is, in a word, cuckservative.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Tiny Duck
    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege? Society isn't fair and Leople of Color have to work 10 times as hard to be thought of as a tenth as good

    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege? Society isn’t fair and Leople of Color have to work 10 times as hard to be thought of as a tenth as good

    I love you, Tiny D*ck. I check my lrivilege at the door, and I don’t allow Leople in my house. They have a disease, you know. They are reprllent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rosamond Vincy
    I covfefe what you mean.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @Ordnung
    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    Bret Stephens has admitted that he is 100% secular and Israel is, in effect, his 'Jewish religion'. Yet this also shows the limits of those who try to understand Jewish behaviour solely through the religious lens. Jewish identity is ethnic and religious. If the latter is gone, the former always remains.

    As for Roger Cohen, he is a classic shoot-and-cry(to borrow the left's rhetoric on Zionists) "liberal". He is always agonising over Israel - but there is never anything Israel could do that would make him abandon it. He's like the J Street "liberals" who keep claiming the 2SS is possible, even as settlements have long since passed the point of no return.

    All of this goes to show that ethnic identity never really goes away. You see this among non-Jews as well. Some of the most anti-white bigots are often some of the most (on the surface) assimilated minorities. For instance, many of those who come from muslim countries, their more pious brethren actually care less about race than the liberals.

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case with many Jews as well. Many Orthodox Jews probably don't care about race that much, but the secular ones do, and are obsessed with defeating white America. Philip Roth's career is a perfect example and Stephens/Brooks/Cohen are following in the same path. There are many others. So this seems to be a universal phenomenom, even if we notice it more among Jews because of their influence over immigration/identity debate, and their near-universal hostility towards white identity and massive hypocrisy on Israel etc.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    I’d agree with Johann Ricke, this isn’t quite right. Every major civilization and people is eager to join the global economy and partake in shallow consumerism and build airports and commercialize. The people of Africa prefer cities, even cities like Kinshasa, and are eager to abandon their ancestral languages and tribal traditions. The strip malls with the giant parking lots are falling out of favor, but that’s another topic entirely.

    I would say that every other major tribe + civilization seems to want to prefer their own tribe and grow themselves, and the European whites are the one that are morally forbidden from doing so.

    Humans do want a greater purpose beyond consumerism and working a job. Race and religion and nation have provided those purposes. Due to past horrors experienced in the name of race/religion/nationalism, those are taboo and suppressed, particularly to white Christians. It’s good that we avoid the horrors of WWII and past religious wars, but it’s bad that we’ve stripped major purpose and identity from white christians.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @anonymous

    This National Day of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration might be the only hope of keeping them from trying so hard to convert every other American national holiday into an occasion for their own ethnocentric ancestor worship.
     
    We've already given them a history month. I doubt a holiday would quench their thirst.

    The right framework for any discussion of Jewish behavior in America is Kevin MacDonalds
    “Cultural of Critique.” Only MacDonald makes sense of otherwise baffling Jewish behavior, its aggressions, its insatiable need to control, adulterate, corrupt and and finally annihilate the larger surrounding culture, Behind every Jewish ploy using words like “tolerance”, “caring” and of course “openness” is the real motive which is the destruction of white culture. There is no sense
    going to Brooks or his type with any off this. They barely know what they are doing themselves. They have been on automatic since before they can remember. Behavior they adopted by simply growing up Jewish . Don’t judge them by their words, judge them by the results their so called charitable actions. The corruption and depravity spread by Hollywood, the mind control efforts of the Main Stream Media, the endless financial scams, and the the gutting of every once great Anglo institution, from Harvard to the Supreme Court. Jews study white mainstream culture as if under a microscope. Its perfectly fair to study them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. 3g4me says:
    @JimWalker
    I have heard Bret Stephens speak twice. He was not like this before Trump.

    @15 JimWalker: “I have heard Bret Stephens speak twice. He was not like this before Trump.”

    I highly doubt his contempt for White Americans and his extreme ethnocentrism were “triggered” by Trump. Perhaps you ought to reexamine his earlier writings and/or speeches with a critical rather than adulatory eye. Merely because you were unaware of his deeply-held biases earlier does not mean they did not exist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @anonymous

    This National Day of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration might be the only hope of keeping them from trying so hard to convert every other American national holiday into an occasion for their own ethnocentric ancestor worship.
     
    We've already given them a history month. I doubt a holiday would quench their thirst.

    Holocaust Memorial Days are recognized by multiple nations, including the US:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_Memorial_Days

    United States 8-day period, from the Sunday before Yom Hashoah to the Sunday after Yom Hashoah Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust (DRVH) Established by Congress as the period for remembrance programs and ceremonies.

    Holocaust Memorial Days are necessary to remind the public that Jewish people are full members and participants in the American diversity and inclusion scheme.

    The American diversity and inclusion scheme recognizes victim culture people’s right to immigrate to the US under any and all conditions.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Mr. Anon says:
    @jimmyriddle
    Ben Judah (author of the much feted celebration of mass immigration "This is London") thinks that reading Orwell is Bad for the Jews:

    https://www.the-american-interest.com/2017/11/20/ive-enough-george-orwell/

    And in a webzine called The American Interest. Funny – I’m an American, and I didn’t see a single article there that advocated anything that is in my interest or in the interest of anyone I know.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Jake says:

    Who needs George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, Robert E. Lee, etc. when you can have a Chosen People teeming with Meyer Lanskys, Larry Davids, Michael Milkinses, Sheldon Adelsons, and George Soroses?

    Well, WASP Elites tend to prefer the latter group.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rosamond Vincy
    Larry David's alright.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Johnny Smoggins
    "When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism."



    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this.

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we're fucked.

    Chapeau !, you sir know what you are talking about.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro jazz ariist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. utu says:
    @rogue-one
    "mandate for letting in not just their forefathers, but every scimitar-waving Muslim on earth."

    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn't ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.

    their ancient ethnic enemy

    Not ancient and not enemy. Who was running slavery business for Muslims in the middle ages in Europe? Ask Spaniards on which side Jews were during Reconquista?

    Read More
    • Replies: @syonredux

    their ancient ethnic enemy

    Not ancient and not enemy. Who was running slavery business for Muslims in the middle ages in Europe? Ask Spaniards on which side Jews were during Reconquista?
     

    On the other hand, things were not all wine and roses for the Jews under Muslim rule....

    The Almohads had taken control of the Almoravid Maghribi and Andalusian territories by 1147.[20] The Almohads rejected the mainstream Islamic doctrine that established the status of "dhimmi", a non-Muslim resident of a Muslim country who was allowed to practice his religion on condition of submission to Muslim rule and payment of jizya.[21]
    The treatment of Jews under Almohad rule was a drastic change. During the Caliphate of Córdoba Jewish culture experienced a Golden Age. María Rosa Menocal, a specialist in Iberian literature at Yale University, has argued that "tolerance was an inherent aspect of Andalusian society", and that the Jewish dhimmis living under the Caliphate, while allowed fewer rights than Muslims, were still better off than in Christian Europe.[22] Many Jews migrated to al-Andalus, where they were not just tolerated, but allowed to practice their faith openly.
    Christians also practiced their religion openly in Córdoba, and both Jews and Christians lived openly in Morocco as well.
    The first Almohad leader, Abd al-Mumin, allowed an initial 7-month grace period.[23] Then he forced most of the urban dhimmi population in Morocco, both Jewish and Christian, to convert to Islam.[21]
    Those who converted had to wear identifying clothing, as they weren't regarded as sincere Muslims.[21] Cases of mass martyrdom of Jews who refused to convert to Islam are recorded.[23]
    Many of the conversions were superficial. Maimonides urged Jews to choose the superficial conversion over martyrdom, arguing that "Muslims know very well that we do not mean what we say, and that what we say is only to escape the ruler’s punishment and to satisfy him with this simple confession."[21] Abraham Ibn Ezra (1089–1164), who himself fled the persecutions of the Almohads, composed an elegy mourning the destruction of many Jewish communities throughout Spain and the Maghreb under the Almohads.[24] Many Jews fled from territories ruled by the Almohads to Christian lands, and others, like the family of Maimonides, fled east to more tolerant Muslim lands.[
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almohad_Caliphate#Status_of_non-Muslims

    During his wanderings, Maimonides also wrote The Yemen Epistle, a famous letter to the Jews of Yemen, who were then experiencing severe persecution at the hands of their Muslim rulers. In it, Maimonides describes his assessment of the treatment of the Jews at the hands of Muslims:

    ... on account of our sins God has cast us into the midst of this people, the nation of Ishmael [that is, Muslims], who persecute us severely, and who devise ways to harm us and to debase us.... No nation has ever done more harm to Israel. None has matched it in debasing and humiliating us. None has been able to reduce us as they have.... We have borne their imposed degradation, their lies, their absurdities, which are beyond human power to bear.... We have done as our sages of blessed memory have instructed us, bearing the lies and absurdities of Ishmael.... In spite of all this, we are not spared from the ferocity of their wickedness and their outbursts at any time. On the contrary, the more we suffer and choose to conciliate them, the more they choose to act belligerently toward us.[9
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_antisemitism#Iberian_Peninsula

    The Exile of Mawzaʻ (the expulsion of Yemenite Jews to Mawza') Hebrew: גלות מוזע‎, pronounced [ğalūt mawzaʻ];‎ 1679–1680, is considered the single most traumatic event experienced collectively by the Jews of Yemen,[1] in which Jews living in nearly all cities and towns throughout Yemen were banished by decree of the king, Imām al-Mahdi Ahmad, and sent to a dry and barren region of the country named Mawzaʻ to withstand their fate or to die. Only a few communities, viz., those Jewish inhabitants who lived in the far eastern quarters of Yemen (Nihm, al-Jawf, and Khawlan of the east[2]) were spared this fate by virtue of their Arab patrons who refused to obey the king’s orders.[3] Many would die along the route and while confined to the hot and arid conditions of this forbidding terrain. After one year in exile, the exiles were called back to perform their usual tasks and labors for the indigenous Arab populations, who had been deprived of goods and services on account of their exile.[4]

     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mawza_Exile
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @Massimo Heitor
    Abraham Lincoln also said:

    Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people. As long as blacks continue to live with the whites they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of mixed breed bastards may some day challenge the supremacy of the white man.
     
    I'm sure Brooks has seen this, but people of his ilk, can just edit out quotes that don't paint the picture he wants to paint.

    Emma Lazarus also was particularly passionate about Jewish immigration, not any immigration. She advocated for the creation of a Jewish homeland that excluded non-Jews. She helped establish the Hebrew Technical Institute. Yet her legacy is twisted into one of non-tribal preference.

    Lincoln never said that. It was in a letter written to him.

    https://quod.lib.umich.edu/a/alajournals/0599998.0006.003?view=text&seq=40

    Read More
    • Replies: @syonredux
    On the other hand, Lincoln did say this in 1858:

    I will say then, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters of the negroes, or jurors, or qualifying them to hold office, of having them to marry with white people. I will say in addition, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races, which I suppose, will forever forbid the two races living together upon terms of social and political equality, and inasmuch, as they cannot so live, that while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, that I as much as any other man am in favor of the superior position being assigned to the white man.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. DaninMD says:

    The boldness of David Brooks is just unreal. His son volunteered for the military — the IDF, that is.

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/09/david-brooks-son-idf-israeli-army.html

    Blood and soil ethnno-nationalism for David Brooks but not for thee.

    “Brooks discussed his son’s service in a recent Hebrew-language interview with Ha’aretz”

    Really? He couldn’t even give the interview in English?

    Can someone call these hypocrites to task pronto, preferably someone who is Jewish? (Because the very likely response to any non-Jewish person pointing out this extreme hypocrisy would be career-destroying accusations of antisemitism).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. Meimou says: • Website
    @rogue-one
    "mandate for letting in not just their forefathers, but every scimitar-waving Muslim on earth."

    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn't ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.

    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn’t ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.

    Why did the scorpion sting the frog? Even if eskimos knew that the scimitar waving muzzies were going to kill them many would still want them here. The instinct to kill the host doesn’t dissappear because you know that the host death will result in yours.

    Some Eskimos don’t have this instinct, some have it, but have a stronger instinct for self preservation(Michael Savage), and there are some who possess this destructive instinct and think they will be immune from the effects of muzzi immigration.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. syonredux says:
    @utu
    their ancient ethnic enemy

    Not ancient and not enemy. Who was running slavery business for Muslims in the middle ages in Europe? Ask Spaniards on which side Jews were during Reconquista?

    their ancient ethnic enemy

    Not ancient and not enemy. Who was running slavery business for Muslims in the middle ages in Europe? Ask Spaniards on which side Jews were during Reconquista?

    On the other hand, things were not all wine and roses for the Jews under Muslim rule….

    The Almohads had taken control of the Almoravid Maghribi and Andalusian territories by 1147.[20] The Almohads rejected the mainstream Islamic doctrine that established the status of “dhimmi”, a non-Muslim resident of a Muslim country who was allowed to practice his religion on condition of submission to Muslim rule and payment of jizya.[21]
    The treatment of Jews under Almohad rule was a drastic change. During the Caliphate of Córdoba Jewish culture experienced a Golden Age. María Rosa Menocal, a specialist in Iberian literature at Yale University, has argued that “tolerance was an inherent aspect of Andalusian society”, and that the Jewish dhimmis living under the Caliphate, while allowed fewer rights than Muslims, were still better off than in Christian Europe.[22] Many Jews migrated to al-Andalus, where they were not just tolerated, but allowed to practice their faith openly.
    Christians also practiced their religion openly in Córdoba, and both Jews and Christians lived openly in Morocco as well.
    The first Almohad leader, Abd al-Mumin, allowed an initial 7-month grace period.[23] Then he forced most of the urban dhimmi population in Morocco, both Jewish and Christian, to convert to Islam.[21]
    Those who converted had to wear identifying clothing, as they weren’t regarded as sincere Muslims.[21] Cases of mass martyrdom of Jews who refused to convert to Islam are recorded.[23]
    Many of the conversions were superficial. Maimonides urged Jews to choose the superficial conversion over martyrdom, arguing that “Muslims know very well that we do not mean what we say, and that what we say is only to escape the ruler’s punishment and to satisfy him with this simple confession.”[21] Abraham Ibn Ezra (1089–1164), who himself fled the persecutions of the Almohads, composed an elegy mourning the destruction of many Jewish communities throughout Spain and the Maghreb under the Almohads.[24] Many Jews fled from territories ruled by the Almohads to Christian lands, and others, like the family of Maimonides, fled east to more tolerant Muslim lands.[

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mawza_Exile

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. syonredux says:
    @Faraday's Bobcat
    Lincoln never said that. It was in a letter written to him.

    https://quod.lib.umich.edu/a/alajournals/0599998.0006.003?view=text&seq=40

    On the other hand, Lincoln did say this in 1858:

    I will say then, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters of the negroes, or jurors, or qualifying them to hold office, of having them to marry with white people. I will say in addition, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races, which I suppose, will forever forbid the two races living together upon terms of social and political equality, and inasmuch, as they cannot so live, that while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, that I as much as any other man am in favor of the superior position being assigned to the white man.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Peripatetic commenter
    http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-lincoln-douglas-debates-4th-debate-part-i/

    I suspect that most progressives do not know that Lincoln said that!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Any non-Jew who isn’t against Jewish power, Jewish culture, Judaism, the Jewish collective or Jewish institutions isn’t thinking straight.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. @Johann Ricke

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism.
     
    That doesn't seem right. Just about every advanced non-Western country on earth has abandoned its traditional heritage and culture in favor of Western mores. Take the countries of Northeast Asia - China, Japan and Korea. The absolute monarchies are a historical artifact. The legal codes are mostly taken from the West. The traditional clothing of each country is seen only in historical dramas. Prostitution, while not exactly prestigious, was once legal in all three countries before Western influence led to legal prohibition. The list goes on and on. The bottom line? Each of these countries has kept its language, modes of social interaction and cuisine. But all else has been swept away.

    They’ve kept their demographics, and can determine their laws and culture however they wish.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Curle says:
    @Big Bill

    We once had a unifying national story, celebrated each Thanksgiving. It was an Exodus story. …
     
    ... immediately followed by ...

    American particularism always points to universalism — how the specific features of our settler’s history and culture point to vision of communion for all mankind
     
    . What kind of incoherent stuff is this?

    Exodus is the story of how God sent the Hebrews out to exterminate their neighbors--man, woman, child, dog, cat, everything -- and take their land. Race purity was so important to God that he ordered the execution of all Hebrew men who fornicated with captured slave women instead of butchering them.

    How in heaven's name does this naturally lead to kumbaya, gentle-Jesus-meek-and-mild universalism and self-extinction?

    No wonder these Galut nutcases are so freaking neurotic. Can you imagine the degree of cognitive dissonance that they must contain within their skulls to even put these two concepts in the same article, side-by-side? They are lucky their heads don't explode just walking down the street!

    No wonder Rabbi Tender calls them "neo-Christians". God help Israel if more of them make aliyah and keep expanding their universalist beachhead in their national homeland.

    “It was an Exodus story.”

    One imagines the writers of this piffle are blind to the detail that the Puritans were enthusiastically aided in their removal to the New World by a people, the British, desperate to be rid of them. Exodus is typically presented as an escape from captivity rather than a going away party.

    Read More
    • Replies: @syonredux

    One imagines the writers of this piffle are blind to the detail that the Puritans were enthusiastically aided in their removal to the New World by a people, the British,
     
    The Puritans were British.
    , @Rosamond Vincy
    The Egyptians were very glad to see the backs of the Hebrews, after all those plagues. One could speculate that when Pharaoh changed his mind and wanted the Hebrews brought back, some of his soon-to-be-drowned conscripts were thinking, "WHY?!! Pay for their damn tickets and let's all sing 'Aloha Oe!'"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. @JimWalker
    I have heard Bret Stephens speak twice. He was not like this before Trump.

    Late onset Trump Derangement Syndrome?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. fish says:
    @Tiny Duck
    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege? Society isn't fair and Leople of Color have to work 10 times as hard to be thought of as a tenth as good

    Ohs Tinys……doze po “Leoples O Colur”….deys alwys bein dancin bakwurds never getsin no kredits fo doozin it!

    Lezurd “Teh koreogrfir” piTTTz

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @Buzz Mohawk
    Accuracy is antithetical to Emma Lazarus Day.

    Wow, the spelling is awful, now that you mention it. Even LazUrus is wrong, which I of course dutifully copied.

    Nevertheless, I think on the Friday after Thanksgiving we should celebrate those toasted masses that washed up on our teams of shores where they could have free breaths.

    Bartholdi himself inscribed this in the base of the statue with a Dremel tool.

    Please pass the leftover stuffing. Hey, this is the perfect day for this holiday: we eat yesterday's food and we honor those who came to dinner late, after it had already been created, cooked and conveniently left in the fridge by those who came before them.

    we should celebrate those toasted masses

    Moderately amusing. But “tost” is not “toast”; nor is it a modern misspelling. It is a literary or poetic rendering of “tossed” which the author used in her 1883 handwritten original manuscript. In a similar way, “blest” has been used for “blessed” (by John Milton, for example).

    Nevertheless, I am not an admirer of Emma Lazarus’s virtue-signalling reinterpretation of the Preamble to the Constitution. As Vox Day and Red Eagle explain in Cuckservative: How “Conservatives” Betrayed America:

    The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America contains an extremely important phrase that is almost always ignored by those who appeal to it, or to the men who wrote it, in defense of immigration. It states:

    We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    The key phrase is this: “to ourselves and our posterity.” The blessings of liberty are not to be secured to all the nations of the world, to the tired and huddled masses, or to the wretched refuse of the teeming shores of other lands. They are to be secured to our children, and their children, and their children’s children.

    To sacrifice their interests to the interests of children in other lands is to betray both past and future America. It is to permit an alien posterity, like the newly hatched cuckoo in another bird’s nest, to eliminate our own, and in doing so, defeat the purpose of the Constitution. It is, like the cuckolded husband, to raise the children of another man instead of one’s own sons and daughters.

    It is, in a word, cuckservative.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    I'm embarrassed now. Thanks for the lesson in English, Mike.

    Agreed, The Preamble is a good place to start when you want to prove that the United States by definition exists to serve its People.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @syonredux
    On the other hand, Lincoln did say this in 1858:

    I will say then, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters of the negroes, or jurors, or qualifying them to hold office, of having them to marry with white people. I will say in addition, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races, which I suppose, will forever forbid the two races living together upon terms of social and political equality, and inasmuch, as they cannot so live, that while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, that I as much as any other man am in favor of the superior position being assigned to the white man.
     

    http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-lincoln-douglas-debates-4th-debate-part-i/

    I suspect that most progressives do not know that Lincoln said that!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. @Big Bill

    We once had a unifying national story, celebrated each Thanksgiving. It was an Exodus story. …
     
    ... immediately followed by ...

    American particularism always points to universalism — how the specific features of our settler’s history and culture point to vision of communion for all mankind
     
    . What kind of incoherent stuff is this?

    Exodus is the story of how God sent the Hebrews out to exterminate their neighbors--man, woman, child, dog, cat, everything -- and take their land. Race purity was so important to God that he ordered the execution of all Hebrew men who fornicated with captured slave women instead of butchering them.

    How in heaven's name does this naturally lead to kumbaya, gentle-Jesus-meek-and-mild universalism and self-extinction?

    No wonder these Galut nutcases are so freaking neurotic. Can you imagine the degree of cognitive dissonance that they must contain within their skulls to even put these two concepts in the same article, side-by-side? They are lucky their heads don't explode just walking down the street!

    No wonder Rabbi Tender calls them "neo-Christians". God help Israel if more of them make aliyah and keep expanding their universalist beachhead in their national homeland.

    Exodus is the story of how God sent the Hebrews out to exterminate their neighbors–man, woman, child, dog, cat, everything — and take their land. Race purity was so important to God that he ordered the execution of all Hebrew men who fornicated with captured slave women instead of butchering them.

    I guess they can’t really complain about what happened to the Native Americans in that case.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @Tiny Duck
    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege? Society isn't fair and Leople of Color have to work 10 times as hard to be thought of as a tenth as good

    Tiny says that people of color are only a tenth as good even when they work ten times harder.

    1/10th of 1/10th = 1/100th. That’s harsh Tiny. Even slaveowners thought of blacks as being worth more than that, 3/5ths of a white man.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. syonredux says:
    @Curle
    “It was an Exodus story.”

    One imagines the writers of this piffle are blind to the detail that the Puritans were enthusiastically aided in their removal to the New World by a people, the British, desperate to be rid of them. Exodus is typically presented as an escape from captivity rather than a going away party.

    One imagines the writers of this piffle are blind to the detail that the Puritans were enthusiastically aided in their removal to the New World by a people, the British,

    The Puritans were British.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. boomstick says:

    The Jewish immigration in the late 19th/early 20th century seems to me to have had a positive outcome for the US. The immigrants had children that became doctors, researchers, businessmen, and atomic bomb designers. I can’t think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics.

    Read More
    • LOL: AnotherDad
    • Replies: @anonymous

    The Jewish immigration in the late 19th/early 20th century seems to me to have had a positive outcome for the US. The immigrants had children that became doctors, researchers, businessmen, and atomic bomb designers. I can’t think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics.
     
    The US had doctors, researches, and businessmen before they came.

    Would you be happy if I gave you a million dollars, but then immediately made you terminally ill?
    , @Dave34543
    "I can’t think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics".

    You may have well just stated: "I can't think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than a mutation of a civilization destroying mind virus".

    Having to endure a large state within a state is a negative outcome, especially when that state is hyper-nationalist while being content to destroy the political unity of the larger state that hosts it.
    , @Moses
    Well, entering WWII was pretty awful. There were plenty of reasons the USA entered, but one interest group clearly was pushing hard for it.

    I used to be as gung-ho as any American regarding the orthodoxy of the rightness of American entry into the Euro theater of WWII. Now I could make a compelling case that America should have stayed out of that fight to let the Germans and Soviets kill each other.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Johnny Smoggins
    "When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism."



    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this.

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we're fucked.

    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism.

    You mean the religion that defended Europe,launched the Crusades, burned witches and inspired its adherents to settle the New World and convert the natives?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @boomstick
    The Jewish immigration in the late 19th/early 20th century seems to me to have had a positive outcome for the US. The immigrants had children that became doctors, researchers, businessmen, and atomic bomb designers. I can't think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics.

    The Jewish immigration in the late 19th/early 20th century seems to me to have had a positive outcome for the US. The immigrants had children that became doctors, researchers, businessmen, and atomic bomb designers. I can’t think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics.

    The US had doctors, researches, and businessmen before they came.

    Would you be happy if I gave you a million dollars, but then immediately made you terminally ill?

    Read More
    • Replies: @boomstick

    As of 2017, as a percentage of years in which said prize has been awarded a person of Jewish descent [world wide] has been award in 48.98% of economics, 38.89% of medicine, 38.74% of physics, 25.69% of chemistry, 12.73% of literature and 8.86% of individual peace awards.
     
    Compared to West Africans the import of Ashkenazis seems good. There were caucasian socialists around, often in the form of a type of Christian, or Owen, or Debs, or "Looking Backward." And there were some Milton Friedmans around, too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @englishmike

    we should celebrate those toasted masses
     
    Moderately amusing. But "tost" is not "toast"; nor is it a modern misspelling. It is a literary or poetic rendering of "tossed" which the author used in her 1883 handwritten original manuscript. In a similar way, "blest" has been used for "blessed" (by John Milton, for example).

    Nevertheless, I am not an admirer of Emma Lazarus's virtue-signalling reinterpretation of the Preamble to the Constitution. As Vox Day and Red Eagle explain in Cuckservative: How "Conservatives" Betrayed America:

    The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America contains an extremely important phrase that is almost always ignored by those who appeal to it, or to the men who wrote it, in defense of immigration. It states:

    We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    The key phrase is this: “to ourselves and our posterity.” The blessings of liberty are not to be secured to all the nations of the world, to the tired and huddled masses, or to the wretched refuse of the teeming shores of other lands. They are to be secured to our children, and their children, and their children’s children.

    To sacrifice their interests to the interests of children in other lands is to betray both past and future America. It is to permit an alien posterity, like the newly hatched cuckoo in another bird’s nest, to eliminate our own, and in doing so, defeat the purpose of the Constitution. It is, like the cuckolded husband, to raise the children of another man instead of one’s own sons and daughters.

    It is, in a word, cuckservative.
     

    I’m embarrassed now. Thanks for the lesson in English, Mike.

    Agreed, The Preamble is a good place to start when you want to prove that the United States by definition exists to serve its People.

    Read More
    • Replies: @englishmike
    Mea culpa if you're embarrassed: I probably sounded like some condescending English pedant.
    I enjoyed your comment, especially the sentence from which I quoted. To skewer "tost", "teaming" and "breath" in one witty sentence was more than "moderately amusing".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Johnny Smoggins
    "When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism."



    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this.

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we're fucked.

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we’re fucked.

    Because whites haven’t accomplished a damned thing since 33 AD. Excuse me, BCE.

    But don’t worry. Harry Truman, who said in 1947 that America was a Christian nation, pretty much proved beyond rebuttal in 1945 that we were no such thing.

    Of course, you have no problem with the mass firebombing of women and children, unlike those weak and feminine Christian men, the Teddy Roosevelts, the Charles Martels, the Sts George.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @Johnny Smoggins
    "When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism."



    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this.

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we're fucked.

    “Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this”

    An absolutely foolish comment. When Christianity was at its strongest in Europe, Christians had no problem dealing with Jews, being ethnicallly strong, and repelling Islamic invaders to boot (Reconquista, Crusades, Lepanto, Vienna, Malta, etc.). Only once Europe become more and more secularized did these problems and weaknesses set in in force. If anything, this is a problem of a lack of robust historic Christianity in Europe, not because of it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The source of the Jewish anger toward whites is the de facto refutation of “chosen” status.

    The best of the white goyim perform astonishing feats that shock and humiliate arrogant Jews. Why does God allow this? This white magic?

    The only solution is to dynamite all of western civilization.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  70. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “The source of the Jewish anger toward whites is the de facto refutation of “chosen” status.”

    You do have to wonder sometimes if they are confused because they somehow have behaviors that reflect an expectation they are dealing with illiterate uneducated populations. Despite our current problems, one advantage of the open society is we probably get a pretty good idea of how people actually are, if you care to notice.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  71. @rogue-one
    "mandate for letting in not just their forefathers, but every scimitar-waving Muslim on earth."

    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn't ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.

    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn’t ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.

    Fix your faulty premise and you’ve got your answer:

    The Jews’ “ancient enemy” isn’t the muzzies it is the Christians. Christianity is the apostasy that got mindspace from the rabbis to the extent of Talmudic attack. And obviously European Christians are the “other” that the Ashkenazi were in contention with for two millennia, and the Ashkenazi–who middle-manned on top of European white societies and thus have higher IQs–are smarter, more numerous and simply dominate Jewish obsessions.

    The Muslims’ ancient enemy is the Christians. The Muslims quickly expanded out of Arabia and were immediately in contention with Christian societies which has continued for the next 1300+ years. And despite a great deal of initial success turned back by our man Chuck at Tours, and continual incursions for centuries by the Ottomans, the last few centuries have seen them continually defeated and humiliated by the superiority of the West.

    Jews are certainly way up on the muzzies enemies list since the founding of Israel. And there’s no doubt that current Jewish policies in the West that sure don’t seem to be rationally in their long term interest . But Jews have obsessions when it comes to European gentiles that are beyond reason.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Dave23432 says:

    I would be curious to know if large swaths of Jewry in this nation would celebrate this National Day of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration.

    As it stands, large swaths of Jewry refrain from celebrating any other American Holiday because those holidays are not Jewish and, as we and they know, the highest priority for them is to stay separate.

    Thanksgiving, our most recent national holiday, is a good example of a holiday that Orthodox Jews skip. In NYC alone, there are millions of Jewish homes that ignore Thanksgiving. How do I know? I work with this population.

    So, would they celebrate a holiday that is self-lauding, with the rest of America, or would they skip it?

    Second, shouldn’t Brooks and company be working toward getting these millions to celebrate national holidays before we celebrate them with a national holiday?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    To be fair, this mentality exists amongst any number of Moslems. Check Moslem websites and the question of whether or not to celebrate Kuffar holidays such as Thanksgiving and Mother's Day comes up.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Dave34543 says:
    @boomstick
    The Jewish immigration in the late 19th/early 20th century seems to me to have had a positive outcome for the US. The immigrants had children that became doctors, researchers, businessmen, and atomic bomb designers. I can't think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics.

    “I can’t think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics”.

    You may have well just stated: “I can’t think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than a mutation of a civilization destroying mind virus”.

    Having to endure a large state within a state is a negative outcome, especially when that state is hyper-nationalist while being content to destroy the political unity of the larger state that hosts it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @Tiny Duck
    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege? Society isn't fair and Leople of Color have to work 10 times as hard to be thought of as a tenth as good

    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege?

    Absolutely! My ancestors crossed the ocean in tiny ships, to eek out a living in a new world, while staving off the Indians; they defeated the powerful British in battle; they fought their way across the mountains; felled trees, pulled stumps, busted sod to scratch out a living on the prairie; they defended their nation in war and built it in peace. They built the best damn nation the world had ever seen, so that their children, and their children’s children, children, children would live in prosperity and freedom.

    You’ve damn sure right I accept my unearned privilege! My ancestors earned it for me. And i’m pretty pissed off assholes are trying to steal it and keep me from passing it on to my children.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Next week in Jerusalem … please!

    https://www.elal.com/en/USA/Pages/default.aspx

    Really, if white gentiles suck so much … why are you here? Israel exists now. There is no reason to suffer–and whine. You can live amongst your own kind and join the ritzyest country club in the country.

    Open offer to David and Sarah and Brett and Mayim and Jennifer and Roger and Julie and Harvey and Brett … you sign the paper renouncing your citizenship and promising not to come back, hand me your passport and your ticket to Tel Aviv is on me. (One way.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  76. @Whiskey
    This is not a Jewish thing. You are confusing the logs bobbing about in the River for the Current. Rather, it is the confluence of:

    A. Feminism and Civil Rights moving to purge a critical mass of Straight White Males (the legacy of Martin Luther King and Susan B. Anthony) to enable a new aristocracy of White women and non-Whites as rulers hostile to the old rulers, people, and history.

    B. Virtue signaling and desperation for acceptance by White men hanging on, this includes non-Jews and Jews alike in managerial and media positions.

    Really this is the function of demographics: Whites are functionally a minority in this country and a despised one; and White women on a feminist rage streak which they've been since Susan B. Anthony on revulsion for White straight beta males; automatically siding with whatever non-White male faction seems the most dominant and tingle inducing. About 75% of the Poz, minimum, is the result of female rage fueled by White men being their equals and not superiors. Even Matthew Weiner understood that.

    This is not a Jewish thing. You are confusing the logs bobbing about in the River for the Current. Rather, it is the confluence of:

    Please Whiskey stop before you hurt yourself.

    Yes, there is a “woman problem” that’s a big element of the crisis in the West. That problem can largely be summed up by “church ladies”. Or more tediously “virtue signaling church ladies not properly controlled and disciplined by traditional men.”

    But Susan B. Anthony wasn’t cheerleading the importation of Somalis to the heartland. (Her attitude in fact would have been quite the reverse.) Most white gentile women are not–how to put this politely–”deep thinkers” or “intellectuals” or “ideologues”. They are lemming like followers of the reigning orthodoxy. Which for the church ladies of old was Christian virtue. And which for the church ladies of today is whatever the heck is on the Today Show. Or PBS. Or what their sociology professor told them. That reigning ideology–”minoritarianism” to stamp one word on all the various stupidities–is in not a creation of white gentiles, much less white gentile women.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Moses says:
    @Anonymous
    As personally 1 of them, I cringe in reading this trio and cringe again in reading the less thoughtful comments here. I have no reason to believe other than that all 3 hold their beliefs NOT as jews but as SOP goodthink Zeitgeist children. I am as a convinced Zionist as any of them, wishing only the best for plucky little Israel, albeit passively, but am as patriotic an American as anyone here, where the flag in some contexts makes my throat constrict and hearing the Star-Spangled Banner has the same Pavlov dog emotional response as anyone else's. I don't care how many jews you can name in the talking-head business in the pro-immigrant camp because by analogy I know that I have arrived at my political beliefs by thinking about them and reaching certain conclusions. I challenge you to show me evidence that this execrable trio arrived at their convictions otherwise than thinking about them and drawing conclusions. Are you going to tell me that there is a genetic component to their mentation? That they are witting or unwitting agents of a cabal? Are you going to blow off my jewy argument because you harbor prejudice?

    Yes, but is it good for the Jews?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Moses says:
    @Whiskey
    This is not a Jewish thing. You are confusing the logs bobbing about in the River for the Current. Rather, it is the confluence of:

    A. Feminism and Civil Rights moving to purge a critical mass of Straight White Males (the legacy of Martin Luther King and Susan B. Anthony) to enable a new aristocracy of White women and non-Whites as rulers hostile to the old rulers, people, and history.

    B. Virtue signaling and desperation for acceptance by White men hanging on, this includes non-Jews and Jews alike in managerial and media positions.

    Really this is the function of demographics: Whites are functionally a minority in this country and a despised one; and White women on a feminist rage streak which they've been since Susan B. Anthony on revulsion for White straight beta males; automatically siding with whatever non-White male faction seems the most dominant and tingle inducing. About 75% of the Poz, minimum, is the result of female rage fueled by White men being their equals and not superiors. Even Matthew Weiner understood that.

    Virtue signaling and desperation for acceptance by White men hanging on, this includes non-Jews and Jews alike in managerial and media positions.

    Fellow White Men.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. boomstick says:
    @anonymous

    The Jewish immigration in the late 19th/early 20th century seems to me to have had a positive outcome for the US. The immigrants had children that became doctors, researchers, businessmen, and atomic bomb designers. I can’t think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics.
     
    The US had doctors, researches, and businessmen before they came.

    Would you be happy if I gave you a million dollars, but then immediately made you terminally ill?

    As of 2017, as a percentage of years in which said prize has been awarded a person of Jewish descent [world wide] has been award in 48.98% of economics, 38.89% of medicine, 38.74% of physics, 25.69% of chemistry, 12.73% of literature and 8.86% of individual peace awards.

    Compared to West Africans the import of Ashkenazis seems good. There were caucasian socialists around, often in the form of a type of Christian, or Owen, or Debs, or “Looking Backward.” And there were some Milton Friedmans around, too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    I don't get this infatuation with Nobel Prizes. How many Nobel Prizes has South Korea or Japan won? Yet South Korea and Japan seem to be at the cutting edge of technology and manufacturing.

    So what if a guy wins the Nobel in physics. Whatever his discovery soon travels around the world and scientists in South Korea, Japan and the rest of the world are able to exploit whatever the prize winner discovered. In fact it seems like a lot of things developed or discovered by Americans of whatever persuasion seem to be exploited in countries other than America.

    I get the respect and admiration towards prize winners. But winning the prize does not necessarily benefit the US because the whole point in winning the prize is to publicly disclose what it is that you discovered. This allows other nations to exploit the discovery and perhaps benefit even more than the US.

    From my point of view I'd take less Nobel Prizes if it meant the intellectual firepower behind leftwing politics for the past century had never arrived on our shores.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Moses says:
    @boomstick
    The Jewish immigration in the late 19th/early 20th century seems to me to have had a positive outcome for the US. The immigrants had children that became doctors, researchers, businessmen, and atomic bomb designers. I can't think of any major negative outcomes, perhaps other than lefty political politics.

    Well, entering WWII was pretty awful. There were plenty of reasons the USA entered, but one interest group clearly was pushing hard for it.

    I used to be as gung-ho as any American regarding the orthodoxy of the rightness of American entry into the Euro theater of WWII. Now I could make a compelling case that America should have stayed out of that fight to let the Germans and Soviets kill each other.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. TJ2010 says:

    Who would have though we needed a holiday for thanking the Jews. I thought every day was a Jewish holiday.

    Show me a day that they aren’t talking about the holocaust over and over and over….

    Show me a day that they aren’t denigrating whites and using the holocaust to do it….

    Show me a day that they aren’t using the holocaust to expand immigration even further….

    Oh well I guess I was wrong. Don’t worry the media will remind us that we are all anti-semitic and need to make amends by admitting more immigrants, shopping for stuff we don’t need and of course race mixing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  82. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @boomstick

    As of 2017, as a percentage of years in which said prize has been awarded a person of Jewish descent [world wide] has been award in 48.98% of economics, 38.89% of medicine, 38.74% of physics, 25.69% of chemistry, 12.73% of literature and 8.86% of individual peace awards.
     
    Compared to West Africans the import of Ashkenazis seems good. There were caucasian socialists around, often in the form of a type of Christian, or Owen, or Debs, or "Looking Backward." And there were some Milton Friedmans around, too.

    I don’t get this infatuation with Nobel Prizes. How many Nobel Prizes has South Korea or Japan won? Yet South Korea and Japan seem to be at the cutting edge of technology and manufacturing.

    So what if a guy wins the Nobel in physics. Whatever his discovery soon travels around the world and scientists in South Korea, Japan and the rest of the world are able to exploit whatever the prize winner discovered. In fact it seems like a lot of things developed or discovered by Americans of whatever persuasion seem to be exploited in countries other than America.

    I get the respect and admiration towards prize winners. But winning the prize does not necessarily benefit the US because the whole point in winning the prize is to publicly disclose what it is that you discovered. This allows other nations to exploit the discovery and perhaps benefit even more than the US.

    From my point of view I’d take less Nobel Prizes if it meant the intellectual firepower behind leftwing politics for the past century had never arrived on our shores.

    Read More
    • Replies: @boomstick
    I suspect the Nobel award rate for ethnic groups acts as a measured tail size for the larger normal distribution. If there are a lot of them at the far right of the normal IQ distribution, it probably means a lot of the ethnic group does well, too. Or you could just measure the population IQ directly.

    Overall, it's pretty good to have a smart population. There can be limits if their culture is horrible, I suppose.

    How about the UK? Did they suffer any significant problems after re-admitting the Jews under Cromwell? They had been admitted under William, then later kicked out because they accepted interest-paying loans. The UK seemed to do well with them once re-admitted. Probably better than English native credit organizations would have done during the Napoleonic Wars.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Whiskey
    This is not a Jewish thing. You are confusing the logs bobbing about in the River for the Current. Rather, it is the confluence of:

    A. Feminism and Civil Rights moving to purge a critical mass of Straight White Males (the legacy of Martin Luther King and Susan B. Anthony) to enable a new aristocracy of White women and non-Whites as rulers hostile to the old rulers, people, and history.

    B. Virtue signaling and desperation for acceptance by White men hanging on, this includes non-Jews and Jews alike in managerial and media positions.

    Really this is the function of demographics: Whites are functionally a minority in this country and a despised one; and White women on a feminist rage streak which they've been since Susan B. Anthony on revulsion for White straight beta males; automatically siding with whatever non-White male faction seems the most dominant and tingle inducing. About 75% of the Poz, minimum, is the result of female rage fueled by White men being their equals and not superiors. Even Matthew Weiner understood that.

    and White women on a feminist rage streak which they’ve been since Susan B. Anthony on revulsion for White straight beta males;

    Don’t you dare attempt to conflate Susan B. Anthony with the third wave feminism of your sisters. It’s not even remotely the same thing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rosamond Vincy
    Susie B was anti-abortion. She argued men would use it to hide their exploitation of women.

    Lena Dunce-head said she never had an abortion, but wished she had so she could better empathize with all the women who had. What kind of a looney-tune wants to shriek "me too!" about such a horrible thing? Even other pro-choicers don't make such statements.

    Trying to imagine a conversation between Lena and Susie B....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Faraday's Bobcat
    Yet if you propose a points-based system limiting immigration to a reasonable number of high achievers, they say, "That would be exactly like the Holocaust."
    , @Moses
    Absurd absolute tell for cognitive dissonance. No one is talking about “closing off america” to immigrants.

    I guess to some people enforcing immigration laws and reforming legal immigration to select based on skills is the same thing as “closing off immigration.”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Buzz Mohawk
    I'm embarrassed now. Thanks for the lesson in English, Mike.

    Agreed, The Preamble is a good place to start when you want to prove that the United States by definition exists to serve its People.

    Mea culpa if you’re embarrassed: I probably sounded like some condescending English pedant.
    I enjoyed your comment, especially the sentence from which I quoted. To skewer “tost”, “teaming” and “breath” in one witty sentence was more than “moderately amusing”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. SMK says: • Website
    @Ordnung
    IIRC, Brooks even converted to Christianity (or it was rumored that he did). Therefore, his column is an even further affirmation that many Jews never fully assimilate, but only integrate.

    Bret Stephens has admitted that he is 100% secular and Israel is, in effect, his 'Jewish religion'. Yet this also shows the limits of those who try to understand Jewish behaviour solely through the religious lens. Jewish identity is ethnic and religious. If the latter is gone, the former always remains.

    As for Roger Cohen, he is a classic shoot-and-cry(to borrow the left's rhetoric on Zionists) "liberal". He is always agonising over Israel - but there is never anything Israel could do that would make him abandon it. He's like the J Street "liberals" who keep claiming the 2SS is possible, even as settlements have long since passed the point of no return.

    All of this goes to show that ethnic identity never really goes away. You see this among non-Jews as well. Some of the most anti-white bigots are often some of the most (on the surface) assimilated minorities. For instance, many of those who come from muslim countries, their more pious brethren actually care less about race than the liberals.

    I see this in Europe all the time. The most secular ones are often those with the greatest venom against whites. Even if they cast away their own (Islamic) religion, they never quite assimilate either. In a sense, their anti-white venom becomes a coping mechanism for a lost identity. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case with many Jews as well. Many Orthodox Jews probably don't care about race that much, but the secular ones do, and are obsessed with defeating white America. Philip Roth's career is a perfect example and Stephens/Brooks/Cohen are following in the same path. There are many others. So this seems to be a universal phenomenom, even if we notice it more among Jews because of their influence over immigration/identity debate, and their near-universal hostility towards white identity and massive hypocrisy on Israel etc.

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism. It was never going to last. Nobody else was going to take them up on that offer. And here we are.

    the only thing that unites leftists (gentile and Jewish) and Muslims is hatred of Europeans and Western Civilization, which is defined by “racism,” slavery, colonialism, nativism, xenophobia, and now “Islamophobia.” The only thing that unites Jews (leftist and “neocon”) and Muslims is hatred of white gentiles and white gentile civilization, which is defined by centuries of Jew hatred that culminated in Nazism and the Holocaust. Only hatred unites groups of people who have little or nothing else in common and are natural and immutable enemies, such as Jews and Jew-hating Muslims. Combined with pro-immigration idealism and sentimentality that is passionately ethnocentric, only visceral hatred of white gentiles can explain why Jewish leftists and “neocons” not only support but celebrate an invasion of Jew-hating Muslim who desire to subjugate and persecute them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. @Anonymous
    https://twitter.com/noahpinion/status/934130176635559936

    Yet if you propose a points-based system limiting immigration to a reasonable number of high achievers, they say, “That would be exactly like the Holocaust.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Moses says:
    @Anonymous
    https://twitter.com/noahpinion/status/934130176635559936

    Absurd absolute tell for cognitive dissonance. No one is talking about “closing off america” to immigrants.

    I guess to some people enforcing immigration laws and reforming legal immigration to select based on skills is the same thing as “closing off immigration.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @Dave23432
    I would be curious to know if large swaths of Jewry in this nation would celebrate this National Day of Adulation and Gratitude for Jewish Immigration.

    As it stands, large swaths of Jewry refrain from celebrating any other American Holiday because those holidays are not Jewish and, as we and they know, the highest priority for them is to stay separate.

    Thanksgiving, our most recent national holiday, is a good example of a holiday that Orthodox Jews skip. In NYC alone, there are millions of Jewish homes that ignore Thanksgiving. How do I know? I work with this population.

    So, would they celebrate a holiday that is self-lauding, with the rest of America, or would they skip it?

    Second, shouldn't Brooks and company be working toward getting these millions to celebrate national holidays before we celebrate them with a national holiday?

    To be fair, this mentality exists amongst any number of Moslems. Check Moslem websites and the question of whether or not to celebrate Kuffar holidays such as Thanksgiving and Mother’s Day comes up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. MadDog says:
    @Johann Ricke

    When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism.
     
    That doesn't seem right. Just about every advanced non-Western country on earth has abandoned its traditional heritage and culture in favor of Western mores. Take the countries of Northeast Asia - China, Japan and Korea. The absolute monarchies are a historical artifact. The legal codes are mostly taken from the West. The traditional clothing of each country is seen only in historical dramas. Prostitution, while not exactly prestigious, was once legal in all three countries before Western influence led to legal prohibition. The list goes on and on. The bottom line? Each of these countries has kept its language, modes of social interaction and cuisine. But all else has been swept away.

    Unlike the West, the Asians kept their people. That’s a big difference. They may dress like the Europeans, but they haven’t adopted the suicidal ideology that immigration is good. Asians don’t accept the Other. Good for them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. boomstick says:
    @anonymous
    I don't get this infatuation with Nobel Prizes. How many Nobel Prizes has South Korea or Japan won? Yet South Korea and Japan seem to be at the cutting edge of technology and manufacturing.

    So what if a guy wins the Nobel in physics. Whatever his discovery soon travels around the world and scientists in South Korea, Japan and the rest of the world are able to exploit whatever the prize winner discovered. In fact it seems like a lot of things developed or discovered by Americans of whatever persuasion seem to be exploited in countries other than America.

    I get the respect and admiration towards prize winners. But winning the prize does not necessarily benefit the US because the whole point in winning the prize is to publicly disclose what it is that you discovered. This allows other nations to exploit the discovery and perhaps benefit even more than the US.

    From my point of view I'd take less Nobel Prizes if it meant the intellectual firepower behind leftwing politics for the past century had never arrived on our shores.

    I suspect the Nobel award rate for ethnic groups acts as a measured tail size for the larger normal distribution. If there are a lot of them at the far right of the normal IQ distribution, it probably means a lot of the ethnic group does well, too. Or you could just measure the population IQ directly.

    Overall, it’s pretty good to have a smart population. There can be limits if their culture is horrible, I suppose.

    How about the UK? Did they suffer any significant problems after re-admitting the Jews under Cromwell? They had been admitted under William, then later kicked out because they accepted interest-paying loans. The UK seemed to do well with them once re-admitted. Probably better than English native credit organizations would have done during the Napoleonic Wars.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. How about the UK? Did they suffer any significant problems after re-admitting the Jews under Cromwell? They had been admitted under William, then later kicked out because they accepted interest-paying loans. The UK seemed to do well with them once re-admitted. Probably better than English native credit organizations would have done during the Napoleonic Wars.

    C’mon ‘stick liberate that big ol’ gentile brain of yours from the ghetto.

    You are drawing the absolutely opposite lesson that English history clearly teaches. The lesson–with regard to the Jews–that English history teaches is that not having Jews around is actually good for you. The Jews were kicked out of England when it was a relative backwater. This didn’t lead to some dark age, but during those centuries England gradually rose to a front rank nation and had its golden age. A few Jews trickled back in later, but basically the English themselves were responsible for all of England’s development–scientific, technological, political, commercial, military–which were, to put it mildly, first rank. England and the British Empire it spawned are a big obvious refutation of the “You need Jews”, “Jews make it happen”, “Jews are good for you” nonsense that spews out from their quarter.

    No. Jews–the Ashkenazi–are a very smart, very capable middle man minority which has ridden up quite well on the tremendous achievements and breakthroughs of white gentiles. Being smart, plenty of Jews are quite capable of pitching in doing good work in science and technology making life better. But Jewish cultural and political ideas and impulses are–put politely–a disaster. (Maybe not for the Jews, but for any nation hosting them.) Anti-national–for anyone but themselves–anti-traditional, anti-human, unrealistic, silly, utopian, ungrounded in empirical reality.

    Wanting to have a lot of Jews in your nation to get to some Nobel prize worthy discovery two or ten or even twenty years before a gentile would have gotten there is silly. It’s akin to wanting to have a bunch of blacks around so your NFL games are “better”. What you should care about is keeping your nation intact and your culture healthy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @boomstick
    A 50% Jewish Britain wouldn't have become the Kingdom that the UK became, and what resulted probably wouldn't have been a great Kingdom, either. Ditto for the USA. But adding the Rothschilds to the UK worked out well. There were some Rothschilds added as nobles in wake of to the Napoleonic War finance operations.

    I think the Jews are around 1.5% of the US population. Is that too much? Not enough? I don't know, but we didn't seem to suffer much at 1.5%, and we got some good docs and researchers along the way.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. This is most definitely a tough area, especially when I reflect upon my variety of experiences regarding Jewish people : Our kind and gentile neighborhood medico Dr. Fried in working class post-war Detroit, who treated the poor Goyem for nothing and sent the kinds home with a bon-bon or such.
    He had been a front-line surgeon in the war and came back with the pictures of horror which he most certainly never forgot.

    And then as a musician, I am more than aware of the monumental cultural impact of the Hebrew songsters : Gershwin, Berlin, Hammerstein,Kern, Styne, Arlen, Kahn, the list, is almost endless, and without these great artists America would be a poorer place.

    Then there was the guy who took over the gas station (and put his wife at the cash register), at which I was running my butt off after school til midnight, for an agreed upon buck an hour, who then paid me two-bits for an hour’s work at the end of my first week under his employment.
    Yes this is a tough area, with no apparent answers.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973 , airborne trained US army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  94. boomstick says:
    @AnotherDad

    How about the UK? Did they suffer any significant problems after re-admitting the Jews under Cromwell? They had been admitted under William, then later kicked out because they accepted interest-paying loans. The UK seemed to do well with them once re-admitted. Probably better than English native credit organizations would have done during the Napoleonic Wars.
     
    C'mon 'stick liberate that big ol' gentile brain of yours from the ghetto.

    You are drawing the absolutely opposite lesson that English history clearly teaches. The lesson--with regard to the Jews--that English history teaches is that not having Jews around is actually good for you. The Jews were kicked out of England when it was a relative backwater. This didn't lead to some dark age, but during those centuries England gradually rose to a front rank nation and had its golden age. A few Jews trickled back in later, but basically the English themselves were responsible for all of England's development--scientific, technological, political, commercial, military--which were, to put it mildly, first rank. England and the British Empire it spawned are a big obvious refutation of the "You need Jews", "Jews make it happen", "Jews are good for you" nonsense that spews out from their quarter.

    No. Jews--the Ashkenazi--are a very smart, very capable middle man minority which has ridden up quite well on the tremendous achievements and breakthroughs of white gentiles. Being smart, plenty of Jews are quite capable of pitching in doing good work in science and technology making life better. But Jewish cultural and political ideas and impulses are--put politely--a disaster. (Maybe not for the Jews, but for any nation hosting them.) Anti-national--for anyone but themselves--anti-traditional, anti-human, unrealistic, silly, utopian, ungrounded in empirical reality.

    Wanting to have a lot of Jews in your nation to get to some Nobel prize worthy discovery two or ten or even twenty years before a gentile would have gotten there is silly. It's akin to wanting to have a bunch of blacks around so your NFL games are "better". What you should care about is keeping your nation intact and your culture healthy.

    A 50% Jewish Britain wouldn’t have become the Kingdom that the UK became, and what resulted probably wouldn’t have been a great Kingdom, either. Ditto for the USA. But adding the Rothschilds to the UK worked out well. There were some Rothschilds added as nobles in wake of to the Napoleonic War finance operations.

    I think the Jews are around 1.5% of the US population. Is that too much? Not enough? I don’t know, but we didn’t seem to suffer much at 1.5%, and we got some good docs and researchers along the way.

    Read More
    • Replies: @boomstick
    BTW, 13% of population provided by a certain ethnic group seems like a really bad outcome. Except for some music and athletic events.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. boomstick says:
    @boomstick
    A 50% Jewish Britain wouldn't have become the Kingdom that the UK became, and what resulted probably wouldn't have been a great Kingdom, either. Ditto for the USA. But adding the Rothschilds to the UK worked out well. There were some Rothschilds added as nobles in wake of to the Napoleonic War finance operations.

    I think the Jews are around 1.5% of the US population. Is that too much? Not enough? I don't know, but we didn't seem to suffer much at 1.5%, and we got some good docs and researchers along the way.

    BTW, 13% of population provided by a certain ethnic group seems like a really bad outcome. Except for some music and athletic events.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @Anon
    I wish these guys would exodus back to israel. :)

    Including Ron?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. @Buzz Mohawk

    Do you guys even accept your unearned white lrivilege? Society isn’t fair and Leople of Color have to work 10 times as hard to be thought of as a tenth as good
     
    I love you, Tiny D*ck. I check my lrivilege at the door, and I don't allow Leople in my house. They have a disease, you know. They are reprllent.

    I covfefe what you mean.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. @rogue-one
    "mandate for letting in not just their forefathers, but every scimitar-waving Muslim on earth."

    Seriously, why would jews want to let in scimitar waving muslims, their ancient ethnic enemy, into their country? In Europe it isn't ending up so well. A reasonable jew would calculate his chances and build a wall or two in between.

    You got there first. My doctor, a nice Jewish man, told me he was voting for Trump based in no small part on events in France, England, and Germany, but couldn’t admit it publicly.
    I’ll bet there are others, even if the multiculti invade/invite types are louder.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. @Johnny Smoggins
    "When all is said and done, only whites, and whites alone, have insisted in throwing away their heritage and culture and allow their nations to become giant airports and/or strip malls, bound together only by shallow consumerism."



    Most of the blame for our current situation can be lain at the feet of Christianity; a weak, feminine religion that encourages guilt, meekness and self destructive altruism. Jews, with their innate hostility towards Whites, have just found ways to exploit this.

    Whites have been led astray by three different Hebrew conmen; Jesus, Freud and Marx. And until we rid ourselves of the influences of all three, we're fucked.

    Even if you do not believe in Jesus, how do you call him a con-man? What did he get but torture and death?
    You do realize, the Garden of Gethsemane opened onto the desert. He could have strolled off and hid out for days until they got tired of looking. He didn’t.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. @Jake
    Who needs George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, Robert E. Lee, etc. when you can have a Chosen People teeming with Meyer Lanskys, Larry Davids, Michael Milkinses, Sheldon Adelsons, and George Soroses?

    Well, WASP Elites tend to prefer the latter group.

    Larry David’s alright.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. @Curle
    “It was an Exodus story.”

    One imagines the writers of this piffle are blind to the detail that the Puritans were enthusiastically aided in their removal to the New World by a people, the British, desperate to be rid of them. Exodus is typically presented as an escape from captivity rather than a going away party.

    The Egyptians were very glad to see the backs of the Hebrews, after all those plagues. One could speculate that when Pharaoh changed his mind and wanted the Hebrews brought back, some of his soon-to-be-drowned conscripts were thinking, “WHY?!! Pay for their damn tickets and let’s all sing ‘Aloha Oe!’”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. @anonymous

    and White women on a feminist rage streak which they’ve been since Susan B. Anthony on revulsion for White straight beta males;
     
    Don't you dare attempt to conflate Susan B. Anthony with the third wave feminism of your sisters. It's not even remotely the same thing.

    Susie B was anti-abortion. She argued men would use it to hide their exploitation of women.

    Lena Dunce-head said she never had an abortion, but wished she had so she could better empathize with all the women who had. What kind of a looney-tune wants to shriek “me too!” about such a horrible thing? Even other pro-choicers don’t make such statements.

    Trying to imagine a conversation between Lena and Susie B….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    " Lena dunce-head" symbolizes the arrival of end-times for the USA.

    She embodies evey known and unknown negative, dissolute, rotten, characteristic, humanly and inhumanly possible, and she is now the poster-girl for leftist lunatics world-wide.

    Damn I actually shudder upon viewing her repulsive, deranged, visage.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Svigor says:

    “Brooks discussed his son’s service in a recent Hebrew-language interview with Ha’aretz”

    See, this is what I mean about Brooks. He comes off as this milquetoast moderate cuckservative assimilated Jewish-America, but he’s fluent in Hebrew, has a son who joined the IDF, and his ex-wife converted to Judaism for him. You’d have no frigging idea whatsoever, if you just watched his PBS blather. At least, I didn’t. The more I discover about the guy (didn’t know he speaks Hebrew), the creepier he gets. That is some front he puts up. I admit, I didn’t have a clue. I always bought his act.

    Compared to West Africans the import of Ashkenazis seems good. There were caucasian socialists around, often in the form of a type of Christian, or Owen, or Debs, or “Looking Backward.” And there were some Milton Friedmans around, too.

    I was gonna say “low bar,” but even then it isn’t true. Blacks haven’t wreaked anywhere near the havoc on Whites that Jews have. In fact, much of the havoc they have wreaked would have been more preventable, sans Jews in the picture.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  104. Svigor says:

    David Brooks is a Jewish Nationalist pretending to be a leftist pretending to be a cuckservative. If he isn’t careful he’s gonna burrow back across his previous path and undermine himself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  105. @Rosamond Vincy
    Susie B was anti-abortion. She argued men would use it to hide their exploitation of women.

    Lena Dunce-head said she never had an abortion, but wished she had so she could better empathize with all the women who had. What kind of a looney-tune wants to shriek "me too!" about such a horrible thing? Even other pro-choicers don't make such statements.

    Trying to imagine a conversation between Lena and Susie B....

    ” Lena dunce-head” symbolizes the arrival of end-times for the USA.

    She embodies evey known and unknown negative, dissolute, rotten, characteristic, humanly and inhumanly possible, and she is now the poster-girl for leftist lunatics world-wide.

    Damn I actually shudder upon viewing her repulsive, deranged, visage.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. jack ryan says: • Website

    It’s a terrible, hard to understand reality but the American Lib Left Democrat Media/Academia Jewish elite and Jewish Neo Conservatives (only Jews in the GOP, Conservative inc) overwhelming support mass Muslim immigration in to the USA, Europe, UK, Australia – the White West.

    And this – take the Muslim side against White Christians is nothing new.

    Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492 or forced to covert to Catholic Christianity under the Inquisition for basically taking the Muslim Moor side against Spanish Whites/Catholics.

    Up until 1947 and the creation of Israel as a Jewish ethno state – Jews historically took the Arab Muslim, Turkish Muslim side against White Europeans especially Catholic Europeans. Jews worked as successful merchants, bankers, tax collectors and sold White girls in to sexual slavery in the Islamic world during the 700 year Muslim Moor occupation of Europe and in Ottoman Muslim empire.

    The fact that Israel has strict immigration laws designed to keep, expand Israel as a Jewish ethno state isn’t seen as a contraction for the likes of Jewish American media pundits like David Brooks, or the Neo Conservatives like William Kristol, David Frum, Jonah Goldberg, the Weekly Standard etc.

    Here’s is the best history lesson about 15th Century Spain with the divisions between Spanish White Catholics, Arab Muslim Moors and the Jews.

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/08/26/spanish-history-lesson-when-jews-took-the-arab-muslim-side-against-white-europeans/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  107. Svigor says:

    Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492 or forced to covert to Catholic Christianity under the Inquisition for basically taking the Muslim Moor side against Spanish Whites/Catholics.

    No. First, the Inquisition had no beef with Jews, only with heretic Christians who were actually crypto-Jews pretending to be Christians. Second, the real beef was the usual; Jews’ subversion of Christian society, attempts to take over while pretending to be Spanish Christians, etc (siding with Muslims is consistent).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?