The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Trump Open Thread
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I must confess I haven’t been keeping up to date with whether Comey Is a Traitor to Democracy or whether Comey Is a Champion of American Democracy’s Proudest Tradition: FBI-Director-for-Life.

I don’t have cable TV so I’m really out of touch.

 
Hide 239 CommentsLeave a Comment
239 Comments to "Trump Open Thread"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Comey threw the election to Trump, that’s why Trump should be impeached for firing Comey. Wait that doesn’t make sense, does it? Whatever, the Dems are gonna run with it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    From the NY Times:

    Many [Democrats] had hoped that Mrs. Clinton would fire Mr. Comey soon after taking office, and blamed him as costing her the election. But under Mr. Trump, Mr. Comey was seen as an important check on the new administration.
     
    Checks and balances are only important during Republican administrations. When Democrats are in office, not only are they unnecessary, they are wrong. All branches of government (including the press) must all row together in the direction of Progress.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Comey had to go after his shenanigans over the last 12 months. The only thing Trump should be blamed for is that he didn’t fire Comey earlier. Though a firing this prominent requires political capital – it’s not an easy thing to do.

    The Democrats, by the way, are now deeply divided. Half of them think that Trump is profoundly disloyal for firing the man who put him in the White House. And the other half think that Trump is trying to cover up the nefarious and so far invisible Russian intervention. They are, however, united in having forgotten that they all called for Comey’s head last November.

    Goodbye, Comey, you freak! I wonder if we will ever know what the hell you were doing. I personally think you didn’t know, either.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JohnnyD
    ,
    Unfortunately, the Democrats and their supporters have control of the narrative, allowing them to "forget" about their previous hatred of Comey. It's like 1984, where the Ministry of Truth can tell people that they've always been at war with Eurasia, when Eurasia was their ally the week before.
    , @Lagertha
    hahahaaa. Americans are very stupid. Firing or not Firing Comey is the weakness. Americans think they are exceptional...but geography is not a firewall.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Made more sense when Trump fired Gilbert Gottfried. Funnier too.

    This season’s been great.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    This season’s been great.
     
    Yeah, okay - that was funny.
    , @res

    This season’s been great.
     
    LOL!
    , @Don Bass
    @anony- mouse
    Buddy, you win the comments thread!

    It's tragic-comic that govt is now exactly a reality TV show....,
    , @Mr. Anon
    That was funny.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Steve, your reaction was almost identical to mine. I immediately posted something on Facebook snarkily asking my friends to remind me where the Comey Conventional Wisdom ping-pong was at when it stopped so I could figure out whether I was supposed to cheer or boo.

    Read More
    • Replies: @O'Really
    This literally happened at the taping of Colbert's show tonight.

    When Colbert led his monologue with the breaking news that Comey was fired, his liberal audience burst out into cheers and applause, much to his consternation.

    The crowd only understood it was supposed to boo when Colbert informed them that the firing came at the recommendation of AG Sessions.

    http://freebeacon.com/culture/colbert-audience-cheers-news-james-comeys-firing/
    , @Don Bass
    @Mr Blank.
    When you say "ping-pong", are you referencing that Washington pizza establishment?
    Where is Weiners laptop? And what's happening with the 650,000 emails?
    , @Olorin
    Such uncertainty could provide a resonant Zen slap right into the realm of Stoic nonreaction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Hi Steve: Why no cable news? You are not a TV watcher? You sure seem familiar with the Simpsons..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kyle a
    You need work on your reading comprehension skills. never claimed he wasn't of possession of TV. He's cable averse. Surely in the year 2017 there are other methods for a fan to watch the Simpsons besides a cable box.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. I really don’t know what’s going on.

    Here’s the “Comey dangerously close to uncover Russia links so got fired” spin (I think), which is possibly the retarderest you can get:

    https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/09/trump_fires_fbi_boss_comey/

    Sane stuff from the ABC. Democrats cry, revealing unsuspected Kung-Fu style 180° turn capabilities:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-director-james-comey-fired/story?id=47309009

    Reminder that Comey is the guy that says “we need an adult conversation about encryption” by which he means “you are all dumb kids to be controlled and I want Clinton-era Clipper-chip-style access to all your data.” (http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/293786-comey-targets-2017-for-less-emotional-adult-conversation-on-encryption)

    Normal stuff from RT:

    https://www.rt.com/usa/387794-fbi-director-comey-fired/

    In which it is said: “The only other time in US history an FBI director has been dismissed was in 1993, when President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno pushed out William Sessions amid ethical concerns.” Didn’t know that. The resulting run of Janet Reno Control Productions sure were ethically much successful as I remember.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. FYI, Mr. Sailer, in regards to the discussion in one of your other comment threads… I just recently found out that James Comey is 6 feet 8 inches tall:

    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/09/tallest-famous-men-not-famous-for-being.html

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-flynn-effect-for-height/#comment-1854211

    I just wanted to add one little caveat. During a mass Australian IQ test back in 2002, the results actually showed, that the people in the 180cm-200cm height range had the highest average scores, whereas the more than 201cm tall group only came in third place.

    Height
    181-200cm – 113
    161-180cm – 110
    More than 201cm – 108
    141-160cm – 105
    Less than 140cm – 104

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-flynn-effect-for-height/#comment-1855060

    “Are You Glad He Got Fired Or Not??” Tucker Debates James Comey Firing

    Published on May 9, 2017

    5-9-17: Tucker Carlson debates James Comey firing with Democratic strategist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. @Mr. Blank
    Steve, your reaction was almost identical to mine. I immediately posted something on Facebook snarkily asking my friends to remind me where the Comey Conventional Wisdom ping-pong was at when it stopped so I could figure out whether I was supposed to cheer or boo.

    This literally happened at the taping of Colbert’s show tonight.

    When Colbert led his monologue with the breaking news that Comey was fired, his liberal audience burst out into cheers and applause, much to his consternation.

    The crowd only understood it was supposed to boo when Colbert informed them that the firing came at the recommendation of AG Sessions.

    http://freebeacon.com/culture/colbert-audience-cheers-news-james-comeys-firing/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pat Boyle
    A lot of my career in government and private industry was based on firing incompetents. I went to graduate school to learn to be a Program Evaluator. That was a governmental position for someone who studies programs and writes reports to eliminate the ones that don't work. In my experience roughly half of all government programs when seriously examined are eliminated. That doesn't mean that half of the programs that pass scrutiny are effective. A program has to be obviously bad before it is summarily defunded. Merely stupid and ineffective programs survive.

    I did that for a while and then moved into management positions where I often removed excess staff. I became, at least in part, a 'hatchet man'. When I quit government where I had eliminated hundreds of jobs. I went into private industry.

    There too I found I was in demand for my ability to cut bad staff. What is 'bad staff'?

    I was in data processing. I managed teams of programmers. I fired/laid off many programmers usually because they couldn't program. Businesses in America carry a lot of deadwood.

    I used to think I had fired more staff than Trump - although they were no where as highly positioned as the one's Trump got rid of. I got rid of lots of staff and I hired nearly as many.

    My net assessment? People who suffer from the incompetence of bad worker will still not thank you for getting rid of them - but upper management probably will. They call you names and they think that they themselves are too nice to do such a job. When I was an evaluator I always said that if you weren't called a Nazi regularly - you probably were taking your salary under false circumstances.

    I never saw Trump's "You're fired" show. But in reality you should always try to make the firing as undramatic as possible. Bad television I suppose, but good business.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Since you don’t have cable news, you missed Tucker IRL “subtweeting” David Frum, referring to him only as “my neighbor,” mocking him for declaring the firing ” a coup.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. I’m confused. I thought I was suppose to hate Comey for costing America’s greatest leader, Hillary Clinton, the election. Now, I’m supposed to see Comey as a good guy, a martyr for American democracy, who was fired before he could tell us how Trump and Putin stole the election from Hillary. There’s nothing Orwellian about that…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Federalist
    We've always been at war with Eastasia.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Comey covered for Lynch and Obama in his July 2016 press conference by making the Hillary classified-emails-on-a-private-server problem go away for them, and in a way that allowed Lynch and Obama not to have to personally expose themselves by directly and openly tilting the scales of justice in Hillary’s favor.

    He probably figured it was making the best of a bad situation.

    It must have occurred to him that resigning in protest rather than participate in the corruption wouldn’t have helped anybody, since anyway there was no way Trump could win the election, right? Right?

    Why should he damage his own career for a hopeless cause?

    But the changing expression on Comey’s face as the election results came in over the course of the night must have been something to see!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. @EriK
    Comey threw the election to Trump, that's why Trump should be impeached for firing Comey. Wait that doesn't make sense, does it? Whatever, the Dems are gonna run with it.

    From the NY Times:

    Many [Democrats] had hoped that Mrs. Clinton would fire Mr. Comey soon after taking office, and blamed him as costing her the election. But under Mr. Trump, Mr. Comey was seen as an important check on the new administration.

    Checks and balances are only important during Republican administrations. When Democrats are in office, not only are they unnecessary, they are wrong. All branches of government (including the press) must all row together in the direction of Progress.

    Read More
    • Agree: AnotherDad
    • Replies: @Detective Club
    Jack D has already been notified by my attorney. He simply cannot go on plagiarizing my thoughts with impunity before I even think them!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Good riddance to the treasonous piece of s**t. He deserved being kicked to the curb like this and more.

    When he gave a pass to Hillary and her cronies over that personal server and private computers used to handle classified info including SAP level stuff. That was a giant FU to every American who handles classified info.

    He showed America that there are two sets of rules. One for the little people and none for the elite.

    If I or any other person who held a high level clearance pulled what she, we would be in Federal lockup inside a day. It’s that serious. No and if or buts. And SAP level, god almighty. Half of her staff should right now be sitting in federal pen. That includes Huma, the IT staff at state dept and the nimrods handling black IT side who sneaker netted all the classified stuff to her private server.

    Jesus H. Christ, Hillary and her staff broke so many COMSEC rules it’s nuts and Comey did nothing but roll over.

    Oh expect a lot of GOPers to be sweating over Comey’s firing. The last thing they want is a honest FBI director who enforces the law. This is why Grahm and insane McCain are angry.

    The Dems are angry because they just lost a Blackhat that worked for them and who they could rely on to block investigations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. Clearly, Trump fired Comey because he wasn’t happy with his performance on the Russia investigation since the inauguration. Otherwise, why didn’t he fire him on day one? It certainly doesn’t look good. Oh, and the reason why Sailer hasn’t been “keeping up” with the Comey news is that he is a Trump fan, and isn’t that interested in talking about things when Trump looks stupid; it goes against the alt-right grain of the website.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    Newsflash: much of the alt-right has more or less abandoned Trump since his Syria strikes. It includes the majority of the commenters on the Syria strikes thread a month ago.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. I’ve long since held any government bureaucrat in any sort of esteem so the political shenanigans of last year didn’t surprise me.

    Comey should have resigned after the muslim terrorist attacks in San Bernadino (if not then, certainly after Orlando) and issued a public apology for his agency’s failures. His posturing as Mr. Good Public Servant sickened me after all those poor non-whites and gays were slaughtered.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. the corrupt media pushed the fake Russia story so the Dems could bug Trump legally

    watergate 2

    imo this is the first stage of Trump getting revenge for the bugging

    will Hilary go to jail before the Parkinsons gets her?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. Lot says:

    You really have to read Trump’s nasty letter to Comey. It is so bad I had to double check it wasn’t a fake.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-letter-to-james-comey-telling-him-he-is-fired-read-the-full-letter/article/2622610

    I don’t think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey’s recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary’s dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump’s benefit, before the election.

    The mental image of Comey’s lie was awfully plausible too, Huma the #2 to the President-in-waiting, telling her unemployed husband to “plz print” random e-mails like a baby-boomer boss to his underlings.

    So this is either erratic behavior by Trump, a touching act of probity by Trump, or both. Trump keeps me guessing! He did purge Christie for sleazy acts against Democrats, so maybe he just is really concerned about running a clean White House.

    Read More
    • Disagree: Kevin C.
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.
     
    Only because he threatened to blackmail them.
    , @SteveRogers42
    I must be an extraordinarily cold-hearted bastard, because I don't think it's "nasty" at all. In fact, I think it's hilarious. Long overdue. Welcome to Washington, Director Clarke.
    , @Clyde

    What is most crazy, is that Comey’s recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary’s dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump’s benefit, before the election.
     
    News reports say Jeff Sessions wanted James Comey out. Trump and others in his administration had no use for him, too erratic. Last week Comey gave Trump good reasons (good cover) to fire him so he did. Now fire that sleazy number two FBI guy also. Force him out and bring in your own people.

    As I posted before, Comey fired himself and has been trying to get himself fired for a while. The least stable FBI chief I have seen in my lifetime. Bill Clinton fired his FBI chief which also gives Trump cover. So did Hillary and Mook endless beyotching about him.

    , @PiltdownMan

    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..
     
    Huh? What does that even mean?

    "Thanks for tipping me off three times—you're a real pal—but I'm going to spill the beans and tell the whole world you did"?

    , @Jack Hanson
    My understanding is that Comey was at an FBI recruiting event when he got the news.

    AG Sessions is a savage. When you see a memo with the subject of RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE (in your agency), you're going to have a bad day.

    Also Comey is nowhere near the player of the game that Hoover was, alleged cross dressing aside or no.

    , @PhysicistDave
    Lot wrote:

    I don’t think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.
     
    Yeah, because Hoover had dossiers on all of them, their families, their associates, etc.

    Hoover was not a nice man.

    Dave
    , @Kylie
    It may have been nasty but it gave me a frisson of...je ne sais quoi.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @anony-mouse
    Made more sense when Trump fired Gilbert Gottfried. Funnier too.

    This season's been great.

    This season’s been great.

    Yeah, okay – that was funny.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. @Lot
    You really have to read Trump's nasty letter to Comey. It is so bad I had to double check it wasn't a fake.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-letter-to-james-comey-telling-him-he-is-fired-read-the-full-letter/article/2622610

    I don't think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey's recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary's dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump's benefit, before the election.

    The mental image of Comey's lie was awfully plausible too, Huma the #2 to the President-in-waiting, telling her unemployed husband to "plz print" random e-mails like a baby-boomer boss to his underlings.

    So this is either erratic behavior by Trump, a touching act of probity by Trump, or both. Trump keeps me guessing! He did purge Christie for sleazy acts against Democrats, so maybe he just is really concerned about running a clean White House.

    I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    Only because he threatened to blackmail them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Comey earned his firing on July 5th of last year, when he went along with Loretta Lynch’s fiction that it was up to him to decide whether or not to seek prosecution of Hillary Clinton. That wasn’t his job, and it is not within the scope of the AGs powers to delegate her powers to the FBI director. He was providing political cover for the Obama administration and the Democratic party. Trump was right to fire him. He would have been right to fire him on January 20th.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. I dunno, every couple of weeks this #RussiaGate story re-emerges and it’s like a DEFCON 3 level situation for people like David Frum on twitter. It’s kinda hard to take any of this seriously after all the (((MSM))) freakouts of the past two years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. There are plenty of patriots in the FBI, expect it to start leaking like a sieve now

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. My sense is that Comey was increasingly erratic and playing both sides of the street, leading Trump and his, team to conclude he had to go. The testimony to Congress, about Huma and her Weiner, quickly walked back, seemed to be the last straw.

    Which was correct, the initial testimony or the hurried retraction the next day? My guess is knowing the Clintons (and Weiner) is that the former was correct, and Comey was trying to appease the Clintons who he figures will be back in power soon.

    Trump has not been feared by the Establishment for some time, so its good for him to create some fear, and remind people that he can fire them at will.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. Steve you can watch cable news on Youtube. People stream cable news on youtube all the time. Just type in (fox news live, cnn live, msnbc live) on youtube search bar.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. 48 hours ago: Comey is a misogynist because he pointed out Hillary Clinton was sharing classified info on an unclassified email server. You can’t expect women to keep classified information secure, even if the FBI doesn’t bring charges! Comey is a hater!

    As of 8 hours ago, he’s a victim of that hater Trump.

    Read More
    • Agree: NickG
    • Replies: @Detective Club
    Maybe now Maxine Waters will get enough votes for her Bill of Impeachment against Trump to pass the House. Didn't she say Trump was a scumbag? Firing Comey just proved what Maxine knew in her dry bones all along!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @anony-mouse
    Made more sense when Trump fired Gilbert Gottfried. Funnier too.

    This season's been great.

    This season’s been great.

    LOL!

    Read More
    • Agree: ic1000
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Comey is an incompetent who was fired because his continuing in the job was unnecessarily costly when (1) he was tainted by various dislikes on all sides of the political spectrum and (2) he was terrible.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. Yesterday I wrote that Comey was fired for being too tall. That was joke but there is something to it – strangely enough.

    iSteve is six four. I’m six four and my father was six four. Good solid stature you might say. But Comey is six eight – a whole different thing entirely.

    My father went to law school so he could be an FBI agent. But he never was an FBI agent. He was too tall – or at least that was the story I was always told while I was growing up. There was a persistent rumor in the sixties that J. Edgar Hoover wouldn’t hire guys who were taller than he was.

    If you saw the James Coburn comedy “The President’s Analyst” you might remember the scenes where the Hoover character sat on a box and was surrounded by all these tiny agents. The producers seemed to believe that Hoover preferred short agents.

    So maybe there is some kind of karma rebound effect operating.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SteveRogers42
    If so, the karma needs its targeting guidance system recalibrated. Comey was never a special agent, nor was he ever an LEO of any kind. He is a loiyuh.
    , @Don Bass
    @pat Boyle.
    Re the height thing. Tall men stand out. Are noticed. An agent often just wants to be in the background, a "nobody"... If you're 6-4, you're going to be seen.
    , @Ghost of Bull Moose
    Apparently his staff guys are extremely tall as well. I'm 6'2 like DJT, and having 3 or 4 cops half a foot taller than me walk in to my office might make me a little nervous.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @jimbojones
    Comey had to go after his shenanigans over the last 12 months. The only thing Trump should be blamed for is that he didn't fire Comey earlier. Though a firing this prominent requires political capital - it's not an easy thing to do.

    The Democrats, by the way, are now deeply divided. Half of them think that Trump is profoundly disloyal for firing the man who put him in the White House. And the other half think that Trump is trying to cover up the nefarious and so far invisible Russian intervention. They are, however, united in having forgotten that they all called for Comey's head last November.

    Goodbye, Comey, you freak! I wonder if we will ever know what the hell you were doing. I personally think you didn't know, either.

    ,
    Unfortunately, the Democrats and their supporters have control of the narrative, allowing them to “forget” about their previous hatred of Comey. It’s like 1984, where the Ministry of Truth can tell people that they’ve always been at war with Eurasia, when Eurasia was their ally the week before.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. From the Atlantic,

    Perhaps Anglo-America still has a chance……

    Evidence suggests financially troubled voters in the white working class were more likely to prefer Clinton over Trump. Besides partisan affiliation, it was cultural anxiety—feeling like a stranger in America, supporting the deportation of immigrants, and hesitating about educational investment—that best predicted support for Trump.

    This data adds to the public’s mosaic-like understanding of the 2016 election. It suggests Trump’s most powerful message, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture. Because this message seems to have resonated so deeply with voters, Trump’s policies, speeches, and eventual reelection may depend on their perception of how well he fulfills it.

    Researchers found that partisanship is most pronounced among the young: Among white working-class Americans under 30, 57 percent identified as Republican or Republican-leaning, compared to 29 percent who identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning. By comparison, only slightly more than half of seniors 65 and over were Republicans or Republican-leaning, compared to over one-third who were Democrats or Democratic-leaning.

    Controlling for other demographic variables, three factors stood out as strong independent predictors of how white working-class people would vote. The first was anxiety about cultural change. Sixty-eight percent of white working-class voters said the American way of life needs to be protected from foreign influence. And nearly half agreed with the statement, “things have changed so much that I often feel like a stranger in my own country.” Together, these variables were strong indictors of support for Trump: 79 percent of white working-class voters who had these anxieties chose Trump, while only 43 percent of white working-class voters who did not share one or both of these fears cast their vote the same way.

    Nearly two-thirds of the white working class say American culture has gotten worse since the 1950s. Sixty-eight percent say the U.S. is in danger of losing its identity, and 62 percent say America’s growing number of immigrants threaten the country’s culture.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/white-working-class-trump-cultural-anxiety/525771/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius

    hesitating about educational investment
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania

    It suggests Trump’s most powerful message, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture.

     

    It's like they're trying to be deliberately offensive. I've got your putative right here, hot shot.
    , @Romanian
    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture through the word putative?
    , @ic1000
    Re: Atlantic thumbsucker on white working-class support for Trump

    Author Emma Green can take comfort in the fact that some sectors of the white working class are vehemently in favor of the Democratic/Progressive platform. Middlebury students, for instance.
    , @Tex
    Yep, being unwilling to acquiesce to the Dems consolidating their power by importing a new people and preventing effective voter ID laws is really just anxiety about a little cultural change. Did the Atlantic advise people to lie down and let it pass?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Hey, according to the Atlantic, Hoover’s 50 years as director weren’t so bad……

    Other U.S. presidents have often clashed with the FBI—J. Edgar Hoover was infamous among presidents and the public—yet many chief executives have favored a grin-and-bear-it approach. Bill Clinton had moments of heightened tension with Louis Freeh, the FBI director he appointed after Sessions, for example, but tensions never escalated as publicly as those between Trump and Comey.

    “The first 50 years or so of the FBI was all J. Edgar Hoover, and there was a very special relationship between him and all these presidents who were in a way quite deferential to him,” Greenberg said. “There were always conflicts and tensions. They sometimes had to rein him in and he sometimes pushed them around. So this is striking to see, post-Nixon, it really is a crisis.”

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/an-act-of-presidential-imperialism/526053/

    Read More
    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
    syonredux quoted Greenberg in The Atlantic as saying:

    They [Presidents] sometimes had to rein him [Hoover] in and he sometimes pushed them around.
     
    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not "push around" the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.

    Dave

    , @nebulafox
    To be fair, for FDR and LBJ, it genuinely was a special relationship-Hoover even babysat Johnson's daughters when they were living in close proximity to each other in the 1950s. Hoover strongly respected those two, to the point that he was willing to crack down on the KKK for Johnson, in spite of his own rampant distaste for the Civil Rights Movement. The rest of them, though... had an "understanding" with him, if you catch my drift. Truman, Eisenhower, JFK, and Nixon all wanted to fire Hoover at one point or another, but they all chickened out. Among other things, Hoover also played a key role in helping further sink Stevenson's campaign in 1952 via rumors of his homosexuality, and had incriminating material on the sexual proclivities of both Eleanor Roosevelt and Joe McCarthy.

    Interestingly, I've often posited that had J. Edgar Hoover lived a year longer, Watergate would have become a historical footnote, and Nixon would have had a normal second term. A cooperating post-Hoover FBI was absolutely essential to the Congressional investigations of early 1973, and there's absolutely no way Hoover would have tolerated moves by the Boys on the Hill to dismantle the Imperial Presidency, and by extension, his own authority. There would have been no Gray hearings but for Hoover's death, nor would Mark Felt have been leaking because Nixon refused to make him Director.

    I think that observation would dampen The Atlantic's nostalgia for Hoover somewhat.

    , @James Kabala
    Comey has been in the news so much lately that he seems to have been around forever, but he actually has only been in office for three and a half years. (Which is not to say he didn't deserve his fate - he seems to have been rather incompetent - but he was pretty far from "FBI director for life.")
    , @map
    What people tend to forget is that the peak of the FBI's power under Hoover happened when America was a very high trust society. Hoover was not powerful because he had dirt on anyone. He was powerful because the general public would never believe that a government agency would be that unscrupulous.

    Today, our society is low trust and most people believe the government tilts evil. Consequently, the FBI is now staffed with career bureaucrats and navel-gazers that are merely threatening to the hoi-polloi and that do the bidding of their masters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. You’ve got Twitter, Steve, which is even better. Here’s a fun exercise for you:

    Search for “Comey” to get the most popular outraged tweets about his firing. Then do another search with “Comey” plus that tweeter’s handle, and see if you can find one from the same person praising Comey last July.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  34. This is about Trump getting bad press not some giant coverup. Dems and a few GOPe types can be so dumb sometimes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. Weiner’s laptop.

    Weiner’s. Laptop.

    Don’t forget. Don’t let them get away with it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  36. I figure that Comey has to pretty much know nothing harmful to Trump, otherwise being drop-kicked this unceremoniously is a very risky move. I honestly wonder if Trump is just still trolling the Democrats: tying them into knots between hating Comey for costing Hillary the election and now calling him the victim of Trump’s “Saturday night massacre.” Pollak on Breitbart is saying, for what it’s worth, that the anticlimactic Senate hearing yesterday, where Clapper admitted again that there’s no evidence of Russia collusion, finally gave Trump the leeway to can Comey.

    Or maybe he was just mad at Comey for the leaks and bad press. Who knows? We’re still back to the n-dimensional chess master or the intemperate loon.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Would the outcome of a Trump-Russia probe have been more or less credible with Comey at the helm of the FBI?
    , @Sammler
    Clapper didn't say that much. Rather than "there is no evidence" he was careful to only say "no evidence was shown to me" which is of course a much weaker statement.

    Also isn't Clapper a known liar and enemy of democracy?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. I think it is very good for Trump that he is willing to fire and replace top officials. That is definitely a way to get the attention of the deep state.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. @Pat Boyle
    Yesterday I wrote that Comey was fired for being too tall. That was joke but there is something to it - strangely enough.

    iSteve is six four. I'm six four and my father was six four. Good solid stature you might say. But Comey is six eight - a whole different thing entirely.

    My father went to law school so he could be an FBI agent. But he never was an FBI agent. He was too tall - or at least that was the story I was always told while I was growing up. There was a persistent rumor in the sixties that J. Edgar Hoover wouldn't hire guys who were taller than he was.

    If you saw the James Coburn comedy "The President's Analyst" you might remember the scenes where the Hoover character sat on a box and was surrounded by all these tiny agents. The producers seemed to believe that Hoover preferred short agents.

    So maybe there is some kind of karma rebound effect operating.

    If so, the karma needs its targeting guidance system recalibrated. Comey was never a special agent, nor was he ever an LEO of any kind. He is a loiyuh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. OT

    The family of the doctor murdered in Boston by an African immigrant have asked that donations in his memory go to open-borders outfit Medicins Sans Frontieres. I guess misery loves company.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/10/overwhelmed-families-british-doctor-fiancee-killed-boston-penthouse/

    Read More
    • Replies: @bomag

    donations... go to open-borders outfit
     
    Wow. It's like after a drug overdose, you suggest a remembrance by consuming more of the substance.
    , @reiner Tor
    They should go to Africa and get murder themselves, instead of unleashing the savages on the rest of us.
    , @peterike

    The family of the doctor murdered in Boston by an African immigrant have asked that donations in his memory go to open-borders outfit Medicins Sans Frontieres. I guess misery loves company.

     

    Two more Poetic Justice Warriors.

    This is an almost perfect modern world story. African immigrant murderer. Why is he in the country? Bolanos was born in Colombia and working here as an anesthesiologist. Why is she in the country? Field was a doctor from the UK. Why is he in the country?

    Not one of these three people should have been here, much less living and working in the United States. The two doctors should never have been killed, of course, but a sensible immigration policy would have had all three back in their nations of origin. Or maybe "doctor" is now a job "Americans won't do."
    , @Ed
    Doctors Without Borders is not an open border organization. It's just that the doctors go treat the sick regardless of political situation around the globe.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. I just realized that Rodrigo “You lookin’ at me?” Duterte will be visiting DC soon. As an experienced and enthusiastic swamp drainer, he would be just what Antifa, BLM, Sanctuary Shitties, and the rest of The Resistance ordered as the new FBI Director.

    Say hello to my leetle fren’!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. @Lot
    You really have to read Trump's nasty letter to Comey. It is so bad I had to double check it wasn't a fake.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-letter-to-james-comey-telling-him-he-is-fired-read-the-full-letter/article/2622610

    I don't think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey's recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary's dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump's benefit, before the election.

    The mental image of Comey's lie was awfully plausible too, Huma the #2 to the President-in-waiting, telling her unemployed husband to "plz print" random e-mails like a baby-boomer boss to his underlings.

    So this is either erratic behavior by Trump, a touching act of probity by Trump, or both. Trump keeps me guessing! He did purge Christie for sleazy acts against Democrats, so maybe he just is really concerned about running a clean White House.

    I must be an extraordinarily cold-hearted bastard, because I don’t think it’s “nasty” at all. In fact, I think it’s hilarious. Long overdue. Welcome to Washington, Director Clarke.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @Lot
    You really have to read Trump's nasty letter to Comey. It is so bad I had to double check it wasn't a fake.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-letter-to-james-comey-telling-him-he-is-fired-read-the-full-letter/article/2622610

    I don't think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey's recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary's dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump's benefit, before the election.

    The mental image of Comey's lie was awfully plausible too, Huma the #2 to the President-in-waiting, telling her unemployed husband to "plz print" random e-mails like a baby-boomer boss to his underlings.

    So this is either erratic behavior by Trump, a touching act of probity by Trump, or both. Trump keeps me guessing! He did purge Christie for sleazy acts against Democrats, so maybe he just is really concerned about running a clean White House.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey’s recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary’s dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump’s benefit, before the election.

    News reports say Jeff Sessions wanted James Comey out. Trump and others in his administration had no use for him, too erratic. Last week Comey gave Trump good reasons (good cover) to fire him so he did. Now fire that sleazy number two FBI guy also. Force him out and bring in your own people.

    As I posted before, Comey fired himself and has been trying to get himself fired for a while. The least stable FBI chief I have seen in my lifetime. Bill Clinton fired his FBI chief which also gives Trump cover. So did Hillary and Mook endless beyotching about him.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Not many are saying this for some reason, but Trump is about to get a user-friendly FBI director.

    If I were Hillary, I’d be quite concerned about a whole new hell heading my way. Obama might have reason for concern also.

    Can’t help but notice the timing. Hillary and Bones reemerge like Glen Close in the last scene of “Fatal Attraction,” and the Keeper of the Shit gets canned soon after.

    Like a royal courtesy shot across a scurvy pirate’s bow. As if Trump is saying, “You can leave the media spotlight, or you can stay. Your call.”

    If it is like as it looks, Trump… is fucking awesome!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  44. Trump should have been fired Comey when he removed his hand from the bible. Along with many others. He would have spared himself and more importantly the country from much of the bullshit over the last three months.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    Should read Trump should have fired comey...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @Realist
    Trump should have been fired Comey when he removed his hand from the bible. Along with many others. He would have spared himself and more importantly the country from much of the bullshit over the last three months.

    Should read Trump should have fired comey…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Thomas
    I figure that Comey has to pretty much know nothing harmful to Trump, otherwise being drop-kicked this unceremoniously is a very risky move. I honestly wonder if Trump is just still trolling the Democrats: tying them into knots between hating Comey for costing Hillary the election and now calling him the victim of Trump's "Saturday night massacre." Pollak on Breitbart is saying, for what it's worth, that the anticlimactic Senate hearing yesterday, where Clapper admitted again that there's no evidence of Russia collusion, finally gave Trump the leeway to can Comey.

    Or maybe he was just mad at Comey for the leaks and bad press. Who knows? We're still back to the n-dimensional chess master or the intemperate loon.

    Would the outcome of a Trump-Russia probe have been more or less credible with Comey at the helm of the FBI?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. @Lot
    You really have to read Trump's nasty letter to Comey. It is so bad I had to double check it wasn't a fake.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-letter-to-james-comey-telling-him-he-is-fired-read-the-full-letter/article/2622610

    I don't think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey's recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary's dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump's benefit, before the election.

    The mental image of Comey's lie was awfully plausible too, Huma the #2 to the President-in-waiting, telling her unemployed husband to "plz print" random e-mails like a baby-boomer boss to his underlings.

    So this is either erratic behavior by Trump, a touching act of probity by Trump, or both. Trump keeps me guessing! He did purge Christie for sleazy acts against Democrats, so maybe he just is really concerned about running a clean White House.

    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..

    Huh? What does that even mean?

    “Thanks for tipping me off three times—you’re a real pal—but I’m going to spill the beans and tell the whole world you did”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @james wilson
    "While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation."

    What that means is that it is contemptible that an investigation was considered in the first place, and the smarmy clown who permitted that circus to survive for a single further breath can now choke on it.
    FBI agents were in revolt over Comey's stonewalling the Hilary investigation. Trump's confidence is due to a preview of the shit that is coming back up that sewer with Comey out of the picture. Drain the FBI, then Justice, then CIA. Put them on their heels and keep them there.
    , @Johan Schmidt
    I don't think you're a child molester.

    I don't think you're a child molester.

    I don't think you're a child molester.
    , @jon


    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation.
     
    Huh? What does that even mean?
     
    Really, you don't understand what that means? He's being accused of colluding with Russia. He's being accused of firing James Comey because Comey was investigating him for his collusion with Russia. He mentioned in the termination letter that Comey had stated on at least three occasions that he was not actually under investigation for ties to Russia. Who wouldn't put that fact in a letter?
    , @anon
    revenge - the dems bugged him - comey protected the buggers
    , @Marat
    That little passage ensured it was the evening's lead-in lead material. Even Trump partisans would have to admit it's a bald-faced lie ...maybe this is a signature Trump manœuvre from his previous world. A type of rubbing it in.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @syonredux
    From the Atlantic,

    Perhaps Anglo-America still has a chance......

    Evidence suggests financially troubled voters in the white working class were more likely to prefer Clinton over Trump. Besides partisan affiliation, it was cultural anxiety—feeling like a stranger in America, supporting the deportation of immigrants, and hesitating about educational investment—that best predicted support for Trump.
     

    This data adds to the public’s mosaic-like understanding of the 2016 election. It suggests Trump’s most powerful message, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture. Because this message seems to have resonated so deeply with voters, Trump’s policies, speeches, and eventual reelection may depend on their perception of how well he fulfills it.
     

    Researchers found that partisanship is most pronounced among the young: Among white working-class Americans under 30, 57 percent identified as Republican or Republican-leaning, compared to 29 percent who identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning. By comparison, only slightly more than half of seniors 65 and over were Republicans or Republican-leaning, compared to over one-third who were Democrats or Democratic-leaning.
     

    Controlling for other demographic variables, three factors stood out as strong independent predictors of how white working-class people would vote. The first was anxiety about cultural change. Sixty-eight percent of white working-class voters said the American way of life needs to be protected from foreign influence. And nearly half agreed with the statement, “things have changed so much that I often feel like a stranger in my own country.” Together, these variables were strong indictors of support for Trump: 79 percent of white working-class voters who had these anxieties chose Trump, while only 43 percent of white working-class voters who did not share one or both of these fears cast their vote the same way.

     


    Nearly two-thirds of the white working class say American culture has gotten worse since the 1950s. Sixty-eight percent say the U.S. is in danger of losing its identity, and 62 percent say America’s growing number of immigrants threaten the country’s culture.
     
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/white-working-class-trump-cultural-anxiety/525771/

    hesitating about educational investment

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania

    It suggests Trump’s most powerful message, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture.

    It’s like they’re trying to be deliberately offensive. I’ve got your putative right here, hot shot.

    Read More
    • Agree: slumber_j
    • Replies: @Hockamaw

    It’s like they’re trying to be deliberately offensive. I’ve got your putative right here, hot shot.
     
    Ha. I was thinking the same thing. That was really gratuitously insulting. I wonder what putative culture Emma Green belongs to? (just kidding, it's pretty obvious)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Comey put himself into the lines of crossfire. To all sides, to all parties, he’d made himself a liability, not an asset.

    The fun will begin afresh when the President announces his nominee to take up the FBI directorship, so get ready for a kabuki extravaganza from the likes of Schumer and his ilk.

    In Comey’s firing the best sign is of Jeff Sessions taking increasingly strong hand at DOJ. That’s what’s actually got the Dem-Proglodytes apoplectic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    In Comey’s firing the best sign is of Jeff Sessions taking increasingly strong hand at DOJ. That’s what’s actually got the Dem-Proglodytes apoplectic.
     
    Jeff Sessions is silent running off the news pages. Very smart. I am sure he is looking for immigration solutions that will work around Obama judges.
    The beauty of it is that Dems cannot effectively complain about the James Comey firing. They have been ragging-raging on Comey for months. This Trump strike is a bit like hitting Syria, an all around crowd pleaser.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. @anony-mouse
    Made more sense when Trump fired Gilbert Gottfried. Funnier too.

    This season's been great.

    y- mouse
    Buddy, you win the comments thread!

    It’s tragic-comic that govt is now exactly a reality TV show….,

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @Mr. Blank
    Steve, your reaction was almost identical to mine. I immediately posted something on Facebook snarkily asking my friends to remind me where the Comey Conventional Wisdom ping-pong was at when it stopped so I could figure out whether I was supposed to cheer or boo.

    @Mr Blank.
    When you say “ping-pong”, are you referencing that Washington pizza establishment?
    Where is Weiners laptop? And what’s happening with the 650,000 emails?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. I love being right:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/trump-open-thread-2/#comment-1864271

    I also love the sounds of hysteria emanating from the Liberal-Neocon Ummah and they haven’t been this loud since November 8th. Twitter is a sight to behold as globalist imams compete in which one will cast a more damning fatwa on The Don. Churcill described it brilliantly:”…as dangerous and sensible as rabid dogs, fit to be treated only as such.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. @Pat Boyle
    Yesterday I wrote that Comey was fired for being too tall. That was joke but there is something to it - strangely enough.

    iSteve is six four. I'm six four and my father was six four. Good solid stature you might say. But Comey is six eight - a whole different thing entirely.

    My father went to law school so he could be an FBI agent. But he never was an FBI agent. He was too tall - or at least that was the story I was always told while I was growing up. There was a persistent rumor in the sixties that J. Edgar Hoover wouldn't hire guys who were taller than he was.

    If you saw the James Coburn comedy "The President's Analyst" you might remember the scenes where the Hoover character sat on a box and was surrounded by all these tiny agents. The producers seemed to believe that Hoover preferred short agents.

    So maybe there is some kind of karma rebound effect operating.

    @pat Boyle.
    Re the height thing. Tall men stand out. Are noticed. An agent often just wants to be in the background, a “nobody”… If you’re 6-4, you’re going to be seen.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pat Boyle
    Of course. That was why Sean Connery was such an improbable 'Secret Agent'. Tall, and incredibly handsome. Daniel Craig is much more plausible.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. The two best tweets on this have been Coulter’s: “Trump should check with a federal judge in Hawaii to make sure he can fire Comey” and Grant Bosse saying “Trump’s greatest strength is causing his critics to lose their ever loving minds.”

    I’d also like to hear from the eeyore blackpill crowd how this is the machination of Jared and Ivanka, since a significant amount of you believe they’re somehow running the administration, all evidence to the contrary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chrisnonymous
    My take on this situation is that it is an instance where the institutionally correct thing and the politically correct thing happen to coincide. The Breitbart article may be correct in implying that Sessions/Trump were delaying Comey's firing, waiting for an opportune moment vis-a-vis "RussiaGate".

    During the election, I grudgingly accepted Scott Adams' interpretation of Comey's actions, which is that he was actually trying to do the right thing by letting the voters decide the election rather than institutions of the government. This was a no-win situation for Comey, and he's never really recouped from it. Instead, he's compounded the situation by making it appear, since Trump took office, that the FBI is some sort of government watchdog authority with the mission of conducting internal affairs matters and reporting back to the American people. Commenter WGG below may be correct that Comey is a peacemaker, but this doesn't change the fact that he is in the news too often seeming to pass judgement on the Whitehouse. Sessions needs the FBI to be 100% on board with the administration and re-focus on actual law enforcement, but Comey is a bungler who has gotten the FBI off track. This is the institutional situation.

    The political situation is that Comey has been giving respectability to partisan innuendo and conspiracy theorizing. The fact of the dismissal means that Comey has complete zilch regarding RussiaGate (or has a smoking gun that will end Trump... in the latter case, Trump acted to buy time and do damage control, but I seriously doubt it).

    The dismissal reflects a happy coincidence in which Trump can help clean up the DOJ while forcing the Democrats to take on the role of RussiaGate investigators by demanding an independent counsel and having hearings. This is politically expedient for Trump because there is no there there, which means the Democrats, if getting what they call for, will be hoist by their own petard. They can only be saved by the GOPe stopping an independent counsel, which will allow them to keep making references to RussiaGate into the future in the absence of investigative closure.

    However, I'm interested to see who Trump appoints now. Hopefully, it will be someone Sessions recommends.

    BTW, if we get to 2020 with no wall and no changes in immigration, I am looking forward to your "bang-up job, Trumpy, bang-up job!" comments.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @Lot
    You really have to read Trump's nasty letter to Comey. It is so bad I had to double check it wasn't a fake.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-letter-to-james-comey-telling-him-he-is-fired-read-the-full-letter/article/2622610

    I don't think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey's recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary's dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump's benefit, before the election.

    The mental image of Comey's lie was awfully plausible too, Huma the #2 to the President-in-waiting, telling her unemployed husband to "plz print" random e-mails like a baby-boomer boss to his underlings.

    So this is either erratic behavior by Trump, a touching act of probity by Trump, or both. Trump keeps me guessing! He did purge Christie for sleazy acts against Democrats, so maybe he just is really concerned about running a clean White House.

    My understanding is that Comey was at an FBI recruiting event when he got the news.

    AG Sessions is a savage. When you see a memo with the subject of RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE (in your agency), you’re going to have a bad day.

    Also Comey is nowhere near the player of the game that Hoover was, alleged cross dressing aside or no.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    Hoover as a cross dresser is BS.

    The story that Hoover, a lifelong bachelor, participated in cross-dressing, all-male sex parties in New York hotel rooms, as reported by British writer Anthony Summers in a 1993 biography, has been widely debunked by historians. The story’s source, the wife of a businessman and Hoover confidante, had a grudge from a contested divorce, and other investigations of the story came up empty.
     
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-j-edgar-hoover/2011/11/07/gIQASLlo5M_story.html?utm_term=.31777825e1a9
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. How different from the days of J Edgar Poofter.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  57. @PiltdownMan

    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..
     
    Huh? What does that even mean?

    "Thanks for tipping me off three times—you're a real pal—but I'm going to spill the beans and tell the whole world you did"?

    “While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation.”

    What that means is that it is contemptible that an investigation was considered in the first place, and the smarmy clown who permitted that circus to survive for a single further breath can now choke on it.
    FBI agents were in revolt over Comey’s stonewalling the Hilary investigation. Trump’s confidence is due to a preview of the shit that is coming back up that sewer with Comey out of the picture. Drain the FBI, then Justice, then CIA. Put them on their heels and keep them there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @PiltdownMan

    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..
     
    Huh? What does that even mean?

    "Thanks for tipping me off three times—you're a real pal—but I'm going to spill the beans and tell the whole world you did"?

    I don’t think you’re a child molester.

    I don’t think you’re a child molester.

    I don’t think you’re a child molester.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Considering that Comey was reappointed over the restrictions of a law designed to prevent the rise of another entrenched over-reaching FBI director, we should be grateful that someone pulled the plug on him before we actually had to discuss whether or not he had become another Hoover.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. @Lot
    You really have to read Trump's nasty letter to Comey. It is so bad I had to double check it wasn't a fake.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-letter-to-james-comey-telling-him-he-is-fired-read-the-full-letter/article/2622610

    I don't think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey's recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary's dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump's benefit, before the election.

    The mental image of Comey's lie was awfully plausible too, Huma the #2 to the President-in-waiting, telling her unemployed husband to "plz print" random e-mails like a baby-boomer boss to his underlings.

    So this is either erratic behavior by Trump, a touching act of probity by Trump, or both. Trump keeps me guessing! He did purge Christie for sleazy acts against Democrats, so maybe he just is really concerned about running a clean White House.

    Lot wrote:

    I don’t think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    Yeah, because Hoover had dossiers on all of them, their families, their associates, etc.

    Hoover was not a nice man.

    Dave

    Read More
    • Replies: @nebulafox
    Ooh-did you do condensed matter theory?

    J. Edgar Hoover was a horrible little man, but that was his job. You don't want nice guys as your *de facto* secret police chief, you want mean, workaholic bastards with a nagging, obsessive, detail-oriented personality. Also, I guarantee that all the bien-pensants lionizing FBI power right now would have been decrying Hoover as a crypto-Nazi two years ago, ditto the security state in general. Trump is very lucky to have such obviously stupid/hypocritical opponents-not that he won't find a way to piss that advantage away, granted, but still.

    , @Ghost of Bull Moose
    I wonder what Roy Cohn would have done
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @syonredux
    Hey, according to the Atlantic, Hoover's 50 years as director weren't so bad......

    Other U.S. presidents have often clashed with the FBI—J. Edgar Hoover was infamous among presidents and the public—yet many chief executives have favored a grin-and-bear-it approach. Bill Clinton had moments of heightened tension with Louis Freeh, the FBI director he appointed after Sessions, for example, but tensions never escalated as publicly as those between Trump and Comey.

    “The first 50 years or so of the FBI was all J. Edgar Hoover, and there was a very special relationship between him and all these presidents who were in a way quite deferential to him,” Greenberg said. “There were always conflicts and tensions. They sometimes had to rein him in and he sometimes pushed them around. So this is striking to see, post-Nixon, it really is a crisis.”
     
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/an-act-of-presidential-imperialism/526053/

    syonredux quoted Greenberg in The Atlantic as saying:

    They [Presidents] sometimes had to rein him [Hoover] in and he sometimes pushed them around.

    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not “push around” the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.

    Dave

    Read More
    • Agree: reiner Tor
    • Replies: @Federalist
    Exactly right. Almost everyone is missing the most important point. You nailed it.

    For some reason we are supposed to think that the FBI or its director is the fourth branch of government. The FBI director is not elected and he is not appointed for life/good behavior like a federal judge. The FBI is not mentioned in the Constitution. It is just a subordinate agency of the Justice Department. No one expected Trump to keep Obama's Attorney General and no one would expect a Democrat to keep Sessions. When their cabinet level bosses are unceremoniously dumped at the change of an administration, why are FBI directors untouchable?
    , @Mr. Anon

    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not “push around” the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.
     
    Just maybe, in a republic, there ought not to be a "national police". At least not one like we have.

    The FBI has been rotten from the start.
    , @Barnard
    Isn't it pretty well understood the only reason Hoover was able to remain FBI director that long was that he had dirt on everyone and threatened to make it public if anyone ever tried to force him out of the FBI?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. There Is No Deep State | The New Yorker by David Remnick the well known Trump hater and despiser
    There Is No Deep State … David Remnick. … Was Deep Throat part of an American Deep State? Some of Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters …

    http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/20/there-is-no-deep-state

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. @Auntie Analogue
    Comey put himself into the lines of crossfire. To all sides, to all parties, he'd made himself a liability, not an asset.

    The fun will begin afresh when the President announces his nominee to take up the FBI directorship, so get ready for a kabuki extravaganza from the likes of Schumer and his ilk.

    In Comey's firing the best sign is of Jeff Sessions taking increasingly strong hand at DOJ. That's what's actually got the Dem-Proglodytes apoplectic.

    In Comey’s firing the best sign is of Jeff Sessions taking increasingly strong hand at DOJ. That’s what’s actually got the Dem-Proglodytes apoplectic.

    Jeff Sessions is silent running off the news pages. Very smart. I am sure he is looking for immigration solutions that will work around Obama judges.
    The beauty of it is that Dems cannot effectively complain about the James Comey firing. They have been ragging-raging on Comey for months. This Trump strike is a bit like hitting Syria, an all around crowd pleaser.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Steve, what’s the point of pretending that you don’t understand a position that’s obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent (whether or not you agree with that position)? The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed. You’re allowed to take into account whether he’s the lesser of two evils. And from their point of view that’s what he was, even aside from the investigation of links to Russia, because he’d likely be replaced by someone more nakedly partisan. What clinches it is that dismissing him when he’s investigating Trump over Russia works against the independence of the FBI.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Difference maker
    ^ Always misses the point that if Russia hacked everything to help Trump they did us a favor in letting us know how awful Hillary is

    So in acknowledging that Hillary is not fit to be President and that Democrats want low information voters, we are left with the wafer thin position that Trump is somehow a Russian puppet

    Which there is no evidence of and is vague and unprovable, and is still better than Clinton the Soros puppet
    , @AnotherDad

    Steve, what’s the point of pretending that you don’t understand a position that’s obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent ...
    The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed.
     
    -- Just to be clear, the standard for firing someone from top management is not "breaking the law" but something akin to "this guy's performance is definitely below the mean/median value of the expected performance of the best person i could replace him with." Comey's not a school teacher or paper pusher in the city planning office. He's the FBI director. This is a county of 320 million people, many of them--including many in the FBI ranks--highly competent. If Comey's not doing a superior job, he should go. He's not entitled to just take up space.

    Now given that, your "perfectly straightforward and consistent" just means the Democrats' howling and mewling is perfectly consistent with their political interests --Trump bashing. Well Duh. But it's not consistent in terms of any sort of disinterested standard like "highest quality performance from FBI director".
    , @Daniel Chieh
    Sounds like SS is mentioning his lack of cable because, to be fair, we should be giving him a bit more money.
    , @Corvinus
    Thanks for noticing, i-Steve style.

    Comey's firing was forthcoming. Trump waited until it was tenable. Regardless, his removal does not stop the investigation. There are two federal grand juries underway, one focused on a RICO case and the other focused on a FARA case. The prosecutors are getting their ducks in a row...they know if they shoot and miss, it makes even more likely Trump will get a second term.

    Are the Clintons crooks? Yes. Throw them in jail.

    Has Trump engaged in similar shady business practices to enrich himself? Yes.

    So, to me, let's find out Trump, the "God-Emperor", is pulling the wool over people's eyes by touting populist while securing his own business dealings post-president. What are y'all afraid of?
    , @Jack D
    This is pure partisan whining. If Hillary was the President and Comey was dismissed, all the Democrats who are whining now would not be whining and instead the Republicans would be. It's 100% pure partisan politics and has nothing to do with the law.

    The FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President (and constitutionally it cannot be otherwise because the President is the head of the executive branch). If the President could only fire FBI Directors whenever there was no investigation of the executive branch pending then every FBI director could ensure his tenure by keeping investigations going all the time, which is pretty much the case anyway.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. jon says:
    @PiltdownMan

    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..
     
    Huh? What does that even mean?

    "Thanks for tipping me off three times—you're a real pal—but I'm going to spill the beans and tell the whole world you did"?

    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation.

    Huh? What does that even mean?

    Really, you don’t understand what that means? He’s being accused of colluding with Russia. He’s being accused of firing James Comey because Comey was investigating him for his collusion with Russia. He mentioned in the termination letter that Comey had stated on at least three occasions that he was not actually under investigation for ties to Russia. Who wouldn’t put that fact in a letter?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @syonredux
    From the Atlantic,

    Perhaps Anglo-America still has a chance......

    Evidence suggests financially troubled voters in the white working class were more likely to prefer Clinton over Trump. Besides partisan affiliation, it was cultural anxiety—feeling like a stranger in America, supporting the deportation of immigrants, and hesitating about educational investment—that best predicted support for Trump.
     

    This data adds to the public’s mosaic-like understanding of the 2016 election. It suggests Trump’s most powerful message, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture. Because this message seems to have resonated so deeply with voters, Trump’s policies, speeches, and eventual reelection may depend on their perception of how well he fulfills it.
     

    Researchers found that partisanship is most pronounced among the young: Among white working-class Americans under 30, 57 percent identified as Republican or Republican-leaning, compared to 29 percent who identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning. By comparison, only slightly more than half of seniors 65 and over were Republicans or Republican-leaning, compared to over one-third who were Democrats or Democratic-leaning.
     

    Controlling for other demographic variables, three factors stood out as strong independent predictors of how white working-class people would vote. The first was anxiety about cultural change. Sixty-eight percent of white working-class voters said the American way of life needs to be protected from foreign influence. And nearly half agreed with the statement, “things have changed so much that I often feel like a stranger in my own country.” Together, these variables were strong indictors of support for Trump: 79 percent of white working-class voters who had these anxieties chose Trump, while only 43 percent of white working-class voters who did not share one or both of these fears cast their vote the same way.

     


    Nearly two-thirds of the white working class say American culture has gotten worse since the 1950s. Sixty-eight percent say the U.S. is in danger of losing its identity, and 62 percent say America’s growing number of immigrants threaten the country’s culture.
     
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/white-working-class-trump-cultural-anxiety/525771/

    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture through the word putative?

    Read More
    • Replies: @bomag

    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture...
     
    The culture a Trump voter wants to protect is not the culture an Atlantic writer wants to protect.
    , @Tim Howells
    Re our "putative culture": He's just denying the existence of any culture associated with the illusory, socially constructed "white race". Beyond the necessary role in creating the otherwise non-existent race, such culture does not exist. I think I got that right ...
    , @fnn
    Yes.
    , @yaqub the mad scientist
    Of course he is. To these people, common law, bicameral legislatures, individualism, separation of church and state, an armed citizenry, technological innovation, and such isn't culture- fancy tribal clothes and spicy dishes are. And he's right. The former isn't culture, it's civilization. People from "cultures" come to "enrich" civilization.

    This dichotomy cannot be stressed enough.

    , @reiner Tor
    Well, I guess one of the shortest books ever written was "The American Culture" or something...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Anonymous Nephew
    OT

    The family of the doctor murdered in Boston by an African immigrant have asked that donations in his memory go to open-borders outfit Medicins Sans Frontieres. I guess misery loves company.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/10/overwhelmed-families-british-doctor-fiancee-killed-boston-penthouse/

    donations… go to open-borders outfit

    Wow. It’s like after a drug overdose, you suggest a remembrance by consuming more of the substance.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @Romanian
    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture through the word putative?

    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture…

    The culture a Trump voter wants to protect is not the culture an Atlantic writer wants to protect.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @PhysicistDave
    syonredux quoted Greenberg in The Atlantic as saying:

    They [Presidents] sometimes had to rein him [Hoover] in and he sometimes pushed them around.
     
    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not "push around" the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.

    Dave

    Exactly right. Almost everyone is missing the most important point. You nailed it.

    For some reason we are supposed to think that the FBI or its director is the fourth branch of government. The FBI director is not elected and he is not appointed for life/good behavior like a federal judge. The FBI is not mentioned in the Constitution. It is just a subordinate agency of the Justice Department. No one expected Trump to keep Obama’s Attorney General and no one would expect a Democrat to keep Sessions. When their cabinet level bosses are unceremoniously dumped at the change of an administration, why are FBI directors untouchable?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Perhaps Trump wants an FBI director who will investigate the improper surveillance, unmasking and leaks during the the campaign and transition. You know, the real crimes. Comey, obviously, would not do that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  71. @Jack D
    From the NY Times:

    Many [Democrats] had hoped that Mrs. Clinton would fire Mr. Comey soon after taking office, and blamed him as costing her the election. But under Mr. Trump, Mr. Comey was seen as an important check on the new administration.
     
    Checks and balances are only important during Republican administrations. When Democrats are in office, not only are they unnecessary, they are wrong. All branches of government (including the press) must all row together in the direction of Progress.

    Jack D has already been notified by my attorney. He simply cannot go on plagiarizing my thoughts with impunity before I even think them!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @PhysicistDave
    Lot wrote:

    I don’t think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.
     
    Yeah, because Hoover had dossiers on all of them, their families, their associates, etc.

    Hoover was not a nice man.

    Dave

    Ooh-did you do condensed matter theory?

    J. Edgar Hoover was a horrible little man, but that was his job. You don’t want nice guys as your *de facto* secret police chief, you want mean, workaholic bastards with a nagging, obsessive, detail-oriented personality. Also, I guarantee that all the bien-pensants lionizing FBI power right now would have been decrying Hoover as a crypto-Nazi two years ago, ditto the security state in general. Trump is very lucky to have such obviously stupid/hypocritical opponents-not that he won’t find a way to piss that advantage away, granted, but still.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NOTA
    There are about 10% of the people expressing opinions who actually have principles, and oppose the surveillance state, the latest war, the next bailout of oligarchs, deficit spending, obstructionism in congress, etc., as a matter of principle. The other 90% hate those things when it's the other side doing them, but favor them when it's their side.

    It's worth noticing which people have principles, and which ones just have a side. The ones with principles are often worth listening to even when you disagree with them, because they're their own men and say what they believe; the others are not worth your time.
    , @PhysicistDave
    nebulafox wrote to me:

    Ooh-did you do condensed matter theory?
     
    No, my Ph.D. was in elementary-particle theory. But, I did later work in semiconductor device physics, followed by work in error-correction theory for satellite systems, and various other stuff. Whatever seemed interesting that someone was willing to pay me for.

    nebulafox also wrote:

    J. Edgar Hoover was a horrible little man, but that was his job. You don’t want nice guys as your *de facto* secret police chief, you want mean, workaholic bastards with a nagging, obsessive, detail-oriented personality.
     
    Indeed. I do not hate the Bureau the way many on the Left do (or did until Tuesday). In fact, my great-uncle was an agent who worked in the forensics lab, quite a nice guy, in fact.

    On the other hand, on sober reflection, I'm not sure the FBI has really worked out well in terms of preserving a republicans system of government.

    Dave
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. @Boomstick
    48 hours ago: Comey is a misogynist because he pointed out Hillary Clinton was sharing classified info on an unclassified email server. You can't expect women to keep classified information secure, even if the FBI doesn't bring charges! Comey is a hater!

    As of 8 hours ago, he's a victim of that hater Trump.

    Maybe now Maxine Waters will get enough votes for her Bill of Impeachment against Trump to pass the House. Didn’t she say Trump was a scumbag? Firing Comey just proved what Maxine knew in her dry bones all along!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @syonredux
    Hey, according to the Atlantic, Hoover's 50 years as director weren't so bad......

    Other U.S. presidents have often clashed with the FBI—J. Edgar Hoover was infamous among presidents and the public—yet many chief executives have favored a grin-and-bear-it approach. Bill Clinton had moments of heightened tension with Louis Freeh, the FBI director he appointed after Sessions, for example, but tensions never escalated as publicly as those between Trump and Comey.

    “The first 50 years or so of the FBI was all J. Edgar Hoover, and there was a very special relationship between him and all these presidents who were in a way quite deferential to him,” Greenberg said. “There were always conflicts and tensions. They sometimes had to rein him in and he sometimes pushed them around. So this is striking to see, post-Nixon, it really is a crisis.”
     
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/an-act-of-presidential-imperialism/526053/

    To be fair, for FDR and LBJ, it genuinely was a special relationship-Hoover even babysat Johnson’s daughters when they were living in close proximity to each other in the 1950s. Hoover strongly respected those two, to the point that he was willing to crack down on the KKK for Johnson, in spite of his own rampant distaste for the Civil Rights Movement. The rest of them, though… had an “understanding” with him, if you catch my drift. Truman, Eisenhower, JFK, and Nixon all wanted to fire Hoover at one point or another, but they all chickened out. Among other things, Hoover also played a key role in helping further sink Stevenson’s campaign in 1952 via rumors of his homosexuality, and had incriminating material on the sexual proclivities of both Eleanor Roosevelt and Joe McCarthy.

    Interestingly, I’ve often posited that had J. Edgar Hoover lived a year longer, Watergate would have become a historical footnote, and Nixon would have had a normal second term. A cooperating post-Hoover FBI was absolutely essential to the Congressional investigations of early 1973, and there’s absolutely no way Hoover would have tolerated moves by the Boys on the Hill to dismantle the Imperial Presidency, and by extension, his own authority. There would have been no Gray hearings but for Hoover’s death, nor would Mark Felt have been leaking because Nixon refused to make him Director.

    I think that observation would dampen The Atlantic’s nostalgia for Hoover somewhat.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Comey is bad. Comey prevented Queen Hillary from taking her rightful place as president. Queen Hillary says so herself. Therefore all Clinton worshippers should be glad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  76. @Romanian
    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture through the word putative?

    Re our “putative culture”: He’s just denying the existence of any culture associated with the illusory, socially constructed “white race”. Beyond the necessary role in creating the otherwise non-existent race, such culture does not exist. I think I got that right …

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @syonredux
    Hey, according to the Atlantic, Hoover's 50 years as director weren't so bad......

    Other U.S. presidents have often clashed with the FBI—J. Edgar Hoover was infamous among presidents and the public—yet many chief executives have favored a grin-and-bear-it approach. Bill Clinton had moments of heightened tension with Louis Freeh, the FBI director he appointed after Sessions, for example, but tensions never escalated as publicly as those between Trump and Comey.

    “The first 50 years or so of the FBI was all J. Edgar Hoover, and there was a very special relationship between him and all these presidents who were in a way quite deferential to him,” Greenberg said. “There were always conflicts and tensions. They sometimes had to rein him in and he sometimes pushed them around. So this is striking to see, post-Nixon, it really is a crisis.”
     
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/an-act-of-presidential-imperialism/526053/

    Comey has been in the news so much lately that he seems to have been around forever, but he actually has only been in office for three and a half years. (Which is not to say he didn’t deserve his fate – he seems to have been rather incompetent – but he was pretty far from “FBI director for life.”)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @Romanian
    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture through the word putative?

    Yes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. I don’t have cable TV so I’m really out of touch.

    Do not worry, do not fret. Cable TV hasn’t got it right yet! It is as ‘out of touch’ as any of us.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  80. Dahlia says:

    The Dems apparently are going to try to ride “Russia collusion” back into power.

    The trouble for them is that many of the grown-ups, the people in charge, actually believe it. It can’t be good to have your best minds in the grip of growing incoherence and delusion. And you know, I think Trump recognizes this on an intuitive level; he antagonizes them so they can never get back to being mentally sound.

    Read More
    • Replies: @(((Owen)))
    Inside the Democratic Party, the establishment is willing to follow the Russia conspiracy lunacy not matter how stupid it gets.

    They're not true believers, but it serves a purpose for them, a purpose far more important than any one election or any one presidency.

    To maintain control of the Democratic Party when the majority of its voters are infuriated by globalism and endless stupid wars, they need to discredit the pro-working families, anti-American empire liberals. Since those are exactly the people that are skeptical of Syrian war, opposed Iraq and Libya, and oppose oil companies and defense contractors running the party, they have to be positioned as tools for Trump or naïve fools.

    By focusing foreign policy on Russian conspiracies, Bernie and Tulsi Gabbard and the entire patriotic wing of the Democratic Party can be impeached. No one with integrity that isn't in the pockets of empire will harp on blaming Russia. Anyone that wanted to stay out of Syria's civil war can be tarred as Russia apologists.

    And the Democratic establishment can keep the party in the hands of warmongers because they're trained the base to hate Russia above all else. That's the point here: If you aren't a base Democrat, you aren't the audience. They're not trying to beat Trump with the Russia story. They're trying to keep control of a party that is made up of the very people they want to betray most.
    , @anon
    alternatively, if the russia story involved collusion between the dnc and the media to invent a probable cause to allow state surveillance which was then used politically then some of them are going to be worrying about jail

    watergate 2
    , @Thomas

    The trouble for them is that many of the grown-ups, the people in charge, actually believe it. It can’t be good to have your best minds in the grip of growing incoherence and delusion. And you know, I think Trump recognizes this on an intuitive level; he antagonizes them so they can never get back to being mentally sound.
     
    This is something I kind of figured too. On the (qualified) assumption that there isn't actually anything there of substance to find, it's possible that Trump or his people have seen some interest in dragging this out, forcing the Democrats to waste months, maybe the better part of the first half of his first term, talking about a story that is going to evaporate, and which is going to make them and the media look stupid and crazy. Assuming he didn't actually do anything wrong, he has an information advantage here (he knows that they're not going to find anything under all of the smoke).

    Remember how last September during the campaign he suddenly declared the Obama birth certificate a closed issue, after having made it an issue for five years, which both let him assume the position of deciding when it was and wasn't an issue and left the Democrats sputtering with rage. I could see that here sometime next year, during the midterms, maybe: "oh, the Russia thing? Here's everything that shows there's nothing to it. Sorry you wasted your time the last two years." Feminist-types would call this "gaslighting."

    As things stand, right now, it's already happening Democrats (and, to a lesser extent, Republican #NeverTrumpers) are getting all publicly lathered up over hearing the same stories that have already been known for months confirmed by new people with no new additional information, in a way that makes them look kind of dumb and desperate (Comey confirming that there's been an investigation which has been known at least since Heat Street broke it last November; Clapper confirming no evidence existed of collusion to his knowledge as of January; Sally Yates basically saying she told Don McGahn what everyone already knows: that Michael Flynn mislead Mike Pence). It's sort of like hearing a story told by someone who has no sense of dramatic timing: they miss all of the cues as to what actually holds an audience's interest.

    My guess has been that the probable worst-case scenario for Trump is that one or a few figures associated with him either during the campaign or the first hundred days wind up getting prosecuted but there aren't any hard and fast links to him, basically Scooter Libby or the Watergate burglars. I wouldn't be hugely surprised if Mike Flynn, Carter Page, or maybe Lewandoski gets charged with something. What the Democrats want though is a full-on revival of Watergate or Whitewater, where they can get a special prosecutor to dig into Trump's affairs far and wide (like his tax returns) and fish for dirt completely unrelated to Russia.

    Here's a question though that I've posed to a couple of people: assume that the Trump campaign actually did "coordinate" with Russia in some way during the campaign, say, by having knowledge that Russia had hacked materials from Clinton and was releasing them through Wikileaks and timing it's communications around those releases. Would that actually be a crime (as opposed to a political scandal)? It's highly questionable, at best. It's not treason, defined in the Constitution as "levying war against [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort," and Russia technically wasn't an "enemy" of the United States. The most I could maybe potentially see is being an accessory after the fact to something Russia may have done (e.g., hacking crimes or espionage) if they did something, say, like help conceal it, or some abstruse Logan Act-type accusation. It's hardly as if foreign countries (e.g., Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Mexico, China, etc., etc., etc.) haven't played games in our domestic politics with the tacit and often not-so-tacit knowledge and cooperation of political campaigns and parties here for a long time. (It's also worth asking: what is the plausible factual "theory of the case" to claim that Trump somehow "colluded" with Russia? What would he or his campaign be factually accused of doing? I'm assuming Trump didn't have an army of black-hat hackers in the basement of Trump Tower sending phishing emails to John Podesta.)

    I'm guessing the legal technicalities might not matter if the political and media outrage is that bad and both the Democrats and Congressional Republicans figure they ought to sign off on articles of impeachment (assuming the Republicans want to be rid of Trump, and obviously the neocons want a new Cold War with Russia). But it's worth pondering what exactly the accusations are and the charges would be.
    , @Jack D
    It's a wild ass bet but it's all they got at this point. Sure they could play "loyal opposition" as is the norm in democratic societies, but where's the fun in that?

    Chucky Schumer is a lot of things but crazy isn't one of them. What's the downside in this for him? At best, he gets real lucky and fans the embers into a real fire (he would be as surprised as anyone). At worst, he weakens Trump and puts him on the defensive. Instead of implementing his agenda, Trump spends all his time fending off investigations. Meanwhile, the DNC gets to fire up the base and has lots of material for fund raising campaigns. All the female Hillary believers are already disposed to think that Her Highness lost only because Trump conspired with the Russians.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @Desiderius

    hesitating about educational investment
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania

    It suggests Trump’s most powerful message, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture.

     

    It's like they're trying to be deliberately offensive. I've got your putative right here, hot shot.

    It’s like they’re trying to be deliberately offensive. I’ve got your putative right here, hot shot.

    Ha. I was thinking the same thing. That was really gratuitously insulting. I wonder what putative culture Emma Green belongs to? (just kidding, it’s pretty obvious)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @PhysicistDave
    syonredux quoted Greenberg in The Atlantic as saying:

    They [Presidents] sometimes had to rein him [Hoover] in and he sometimes pushed them around.
     
    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not "push around" the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.

    Dave

    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not “push around” the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.

    Just maybe, in a republic, there ought not to be a “national police”. At least not one like we have.

    The FBI has been rotten from the start.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    It's true that the Founding Fathers thought that law enforcement was largely a state matter and that we lived without a national police force* for the 1st 150 years of the Republic, but what did they know about fighting tyranny?

    *Other than the highly decentralized US Marshals.
    , @Brutusale
    I agree, as does Whitey Bulger.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @anony-mouse
    Made more sense when Trump fired Gilbert Gottfried. Funnier too.

    This season's been great.

    That was funny.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. @Dahlia
    The Dems apparently are going to try to ride "Russia collusion" back into power.

    The trouble for them is that many of the grown-ups, the people in charge, actually believe it. It can't be good to have your best minds in the grip of growing incoherence and delusion. And you know, I think Trump recognizes this on an intuitive level; he antagonizes them so they can never get back to being mentally sound.

    Inside the Democratic Party, the establishment is willing to follow the Russia conspiracy lunacy not matter how stupid it gets.

    They’re not true believers, but it serves a purpose for them, a purpose far more important than any one election or any one presidency.

    To maintain control of the Democratic Party when the majority of its voters are infuriated by globalism and endless stupid wars, they need to discredit the pro-working families, anti-American empire liberals. Since those are exactly the people that are skeptical of Syrian war, opposed Iraq and Libya, and oppose oil companies and defense contractors running the party, they have to be positioned as tools for Trump or naïve fools.

    By focusing foreign policy on Russian conspiracies, Bernie and Tulsi Gabbard and the entire patriotic wing of the Democratic Party can be impeached. No one with integrity that isn’t in the pockets of empire will harp on blaming Russia. Anyone that wanted to stay out of Syria’s civil war can be tarred as Russia apologists.

    And the Democratic establishment can keep the party in the hands of warmongers because they’re trained the base to hate Russia above all else. That’s the point here: If you aren’t a base Democrat, you aren’t the audience. They’re not trying to beat Trump with the Russia story. They’re trying to keep control of a party that is made up of the very people they want to betray most.

    Read More
    • Replies: @27 year old
    Big if true.

    I say this one is a good candidate for a gold box, Steve

    , @Jack D

    And the Democratic establishment can keep the party in the hands of warmongers because they’re trained the base to hate Russia above all else.
     
    Yes, the left is famous for its hatred of Russia and all things Soviet. The US has always been at war with Putinstan. That thing with Hillary and the RESET button never happened.

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary's coronation. Stalin killing millions - crickets. But messin' with Hill - them's fightin' words.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Romanian
    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture through the word putative?

    Of course he is. To these people, common law, bicameral legislatures, individualism, separation of church and state, an armed citizenry, technological innovation, and such isn’t culture- fancy tribal clothes and spicy dishes are. And he’s right. The former isn’t culture, it’s civilization. People from “cultures” come to “enrich” civilization.

    This dichotomy cannot be stressed enough.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clark Westwood

    common law, bicameral legislatures, individualism, separation of church and state, an armed citizenry, technological innovation
     
    We got those from the Romans, who stole them from the Greeks, who stole them from the Egyptians, who were really black anyway. And anything we didn't get from the Romans we got from the medieval Muslims who saved civilization. So, you see, white people are parasites whose only culture had to be taken from others.

    /sarcasm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Trump is proving to be an entertaining politician. He is not necessarily good for my issues, but he is a different breed of cat than we have been seeing for 30 years. Last week all the fake news outlets were saying how Trump probably should have canned Comey, but now it was too late. Then Trump fires Comey.

    I’ve been calling Trump the Mule for almost two years now. He is not a a reformer or another guy with a vision that looks like the status quo. He is the destroyer of worlds.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sammler
    I dislike calling Trump "the Mule" because it relies on mapping the globalist ruling class to the Second Foundation. Which is far more credit than they deserve; they have proven incapable of any planning beyond grabbing what they can and hoping the insoluble problems will somehow go away.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. The whole of the Federal Goverment seems to revolve around the idea of “classified” information and leaks thereof.

    Most nations do not have much classified information and the individual states don’t seem to have it at all. Obviously there needs to be some method of sharing information about private conversations with world leaders and important military secrets among top government officials, but people like Huma Abedin should not even have access to such information.

    Nothing has been or can be revealed about the nature of the “classified” information that Huma Abedin allowed to reach the laptop of her husband, known to the press as “disgraced sex-pervert Anthony Weiner”, but it can probably be assumed that this information is in the hands of Israel,or potentially so.

    Comey’s revelations about the Huma Abedin emails just before the election were just innuendo, revealing absolutely nothing about what secrets had been given away, but implying that vast tranches of top secret information were involved, when probably the information was nothing more than Hillary Clinton’s pantie size.

    This may or may not have influenced the result of the election. Nobody can really tell, but Comey should have known that potentially it could influence some voters.

    In spite of an FBI investigation, Comey was apparently unable to determine whether anyone had ever told Mrs. Clinton she was supposed to use a State Department email server and email address for official communications. He apparently believed that Mrs. Clinton probably spent most of her taxpayer-paid time at State dashing off 30,00 now deleted emails planning Chelsea’s wedding.

    Comey needed to be fired, as he is a complete dick, as evidence by his ludicrous testimony to the Senate Oversight Committee explaining how he makes decisions in terms of “seeing open gates”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D

    The whole of the Federal Gover[n]ment seems to revolve around the idea of “classified” information and leaks thereof.
     
    Excessive secrecy is the the natural outcome of any bureaucratic state. Knowledge is power. In the Soviet Union even street maps and the phone book were state secrets.

    The difference in America is that the government leaks like a sieve in the interest of politics. The bureaucracy (the "Deep State") is supposed to be neutral but it isn't. (DC voted 93% for Hillary - better than Fidel Castro could have done in a fair election). As the rest of the country shifts toward being more and more "red" the blue bureaucracy is forced to wage a anti-democratic rear guard action through selective leaking, judges blocking Presidential decrees, blue local governments ignoring Federal mandates, etc. It's really a recipe for civil war, unfortunately.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. @Anonymous Nephew
    OT

    The family of the doctor murdered in Boston by an African immigrant have asked that donations in his memory go to open-borders outfit Medicins Sans Frontieres. I guess misery loves company.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/10/overwhelmed-families-british-doctor-fiancee-killed-boston-penthouse/

    They should go to Africa and get murder themselves, instead of unleashing the savages on the rest of us.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. October 31st, 2016 Comey’s Coup

    FBI Director James Comey’s letter to Congress on new evidence in the Clinton email scandal represents interference in the presidential campaign commensurate to his failure to indict candidate Hillary Clinton for crimes greater than those committed by citizens that are now serving time.

    http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2016/10/31/comey-s-coup#more44513

    Jul 7, 2016 Justice Vs. “Just Us”: Of Course the FBI Let Hillary off the Hook

    The only thing that surprises me is that anyone is surprised by this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  90. @Romanian
    Is he doubting the existence of an American culture through the word putative?

    Well, I guess one of the shortest books ever written was “The American Culture” or something…

    Read More
    • Replies: @syonredux

    Well, I guess one of the shortest books ever written was “The American Culture” or something…
     
    I always recommend Albion's Seed as a good place to start

    https://www.amazon.com/Albions-Seed-British-Folkways-Cultural/dp/1522668314
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. @PhysicistDave
    syonredux quoted Greenberg in The Atlantic as saying:

    They [Presidents] sometimes had to rein him [Hoover] in and he sometimes pushed them around.
     
    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not "push around" the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.

    Dave

    Isn’t it pretty well understood the only reason Hoover was able to remain FBI director that long was that he had dirt on everyone and threatened to make it public if anyone ever tried to force him out of the FBI?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @PiltdownMan

    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..
     
    Huh? What does that even mean?

    "Thanks for tipping me off three times—you're a real pal—but I'm going to spill the beans and tell the whole world you did"?

    revenge – the dems bugged him – comey protected the buggers

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @Thomas
    I figure that Comey has to pretty much know nothing harmful to Trump, otherwise being drop-kicked this unceremoniously is a very risky move. I honestly wonder if Trump is just still trolling the Democrats: tying them into knots between hating Comey for costing Hillary the election and now calling him the victim of Trump's "Saturday night massacre." Pollak on Breitbart is saying, for what it's worth, that the anticlimactic Senate hearing yesterday, where Clapper admitted again that there's no evidence of Russia collusion, finally gave Trump the leeway to can Comey.

    Or maybe he was just mad at Comey for the leaks and bad press. Who knows? We're still back to the n-dimensional chess master or the intemperate loon.

    Clapper didn’t say that much. Rather than “there is no evidence” he was careful to only say “no evidence was shown to me” which is of course a much weaker statement.

    Also isn’t Clapper a known liar and enemy of democracy?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Phrases like “dark day for our democracy” will have lost all meaning from overuse by halfway through the first term. The hysterics coming from the dems on this are, well, hilarious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  95. @Anonymous Nephew
    OT

    The family of the doctor murdered in Boston by an African immigrant have asked that donations in his memory go to open-borders outfit Medicins Sans Frontieres. I guess misery loves company.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/10/overwhelmed-families-british-doctor-fiancee-killed-boston-penthouse/

    The family of the doctor murdered in Boston by an African immigrant have asked that donations in his memory go to open-borders outfit Medicins Sans Frontieres. I guess misery loves company.

    Two more Poetic Justice Warriors.

    This is an almost perfect modern world story. African immigrant murderer. Why is he in the country? Bolanos was born in Colombia and working here as an anesthesiologist. Why is she in the country? Field was a doctor from the UK. Why is he in the country?

    Not one of these three people should have been here, much less living and working in the United States. The two doctors should never have been killed, of course, but a sensible immigration policy would have had all three back in their nations of origin. Or maybe “doctor” is now a job “Americans won’t do.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @Dahlia
    The Dems apparently are going to try to ride "Russia collusion" back into power.

    The trouble for them is that many of the grown-ups, the people in charge, actually believe it. It can't be good to have your best minds in the grip of growing incoherence and delusion. And you know, I think Trump recognizes this on an intuitive level; he antagonizes them so they can never get back to being mentally sound.

    alternatively, if the russia story involved collusion between the dnc and the media to invent a probable cause to allow state surveillance which was then used politically then some of them are going to be worrying about jail

    watergate 2

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    If collusion between the DNC and the media was a crime, then every MSM reporter in Washington would be in jail already.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. @syonredux
    From the Atlantic,

    Perhaps Anglo-America still has a chance......

    Evidence suggests financially troubled voters in the white working class were more likely to prefer Clinton over Trump. Besides partisan affiliation, it was cultural anxiety—feeling like a stranger in America, supporting the deportation of immigrants, and hesitating about educational investment—that best predicted support for Trump.
     

    This data adds to the public’s mosaic-like understanding of the 2016 election. It suggests Trump’s most powerful message, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture. Because this message seems to have resonated so deeply with voters, Trump’s policies, speeches, and eventual reelection may depend on their perception of how well he fulfills it.
     

    Researchers found that partisanship is most pronounced among the young: Among white working-class Americans under 30, 57 percent identified as Republican or Republican-leaning, compared to 29 percent who identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning. By comparison, only slightly more than half of seniors 65 and over were Republicans or Republican-leaning, compared to over one-third who were Democrats or Democratic-leaning.
     

    Controlling for other demographic variables, three factors stood out as strong independent predictors of how white working-class people would vote. The first was anxiety about cultural change. Sixty-eight percent of white working-class voters said the American way of life needs to be protected from foreign influence. And nearly half agreed with the statement, “things have changed so much that I often feel like a stranger in my own country.” Together, these variables were strong indictors of support for Trump: 79 percent of white working-class voters who had these anxieties chose Trump, while only 43 percent of white working-class voters who did not share one or both of these fears cast their vote the same way.

     


    Nearly two-thirds of the white working class say American culture has gotten worse since the 1950s. Sixty-eight percent say the U.S. is in danger of losing its identity, and 62 percent say America’s growing number of immigrants threaten the country’s culture.
     
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/white-working-class-trump-cultural-anxiety/525771/

    Re: Atlantic thumbsucker on white working-class support for Trump

    Author Emma Green can take comfort in the fact that some sectors of the white working class are vehemently in favor of the Democratic/Progressive platform. Middlebury students, for instance.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Finally Trump the sleep-deprived jackass makes a ballsy move.

    Now watch him replace Comey with a democrat.

    BTW Trump didn’t postpone the announcement on the co2 Paris treaty because he’s pulling out of it. He’s obviously keeping us in.

    Trump sucks. It’s gonna get worse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  99. @Anonymous Nephew
    OT

    The family of the doctor murdered in Boston by an African immigrant have asked that donations in his memory go to open-borders outfit Medicins Sans Frontieres. I guess misery loves company.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/10/overwhelmed-families-british-doctor-fiancee-killed-boston-penthouse/

    Doctors Without Borders is not an open border organization. It’s just that the doctors go treat the sick regardless of political situation around the globe.

    Read More
    • Agree: PiltdownMan
    • Replies: @27 year old
    Right, it's just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It's just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.
    , @Anonymous Nephew
    What 27 year old said. It is in practice an open-the-borders organisation. They are, for example, prominent in the Calais "refugee" camps - as we know, the French don't have any doctors of their own.

    http://www.msf.org/en/article/france-calais-%E2%80%98jungle%E2%80%99-about-be-dismantled-what-will-become-unaccompanied-minors

    They also have the largest "rescue ship" picking up illegal immigrants a few miles off the Libyan coast and ferrying them to Europe.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/refugee-crisis-msf-syria-mediterranean-sea-deaths-rescue-ships-bourbon-argos-libya-operation-sophia-a7394021.html

    https://www.msf.org.uk/country/mediterranean-search-and-rescue
    , @James Kabala
    I think the name "Without Borders" did not originally have anything to do with open borders - it meant the doctors go anywhere regardless of borders - but they have adopted that as one of their policies since that time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Comey fell on the knife to protect HRC back in July 2016, so there should be no surprise that it would eventually penetrate the flesh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  101. Drudge ran with something like this yesterday:

    http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/article149309469.html

    Scares me to death.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  102. I think we should look to the example of Castro or Lenin to see how Leaders reward their political backers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. There is no wall happening. No deportations to speak of. No workplace enforcement. No end to the document/ID/tax fraud by illegals.

    But the bogus refugee program remains fully funded.

    HB visas increasing in various categories.

    HE’S SETTING THE STAGE FOR AMNESTY.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    I THINK YOUR CAPS KEY IS STUCK.

    Setting the stage? Wake us when the curtain lifts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Trump threw Assange and wikileaks under the bus. SICK.

    Trump loves big surveillance! Gonna send a message to any potential whistleblowers out there!

    Oh yeah, 5000 more troops to Crapghanistan because the Taliban is starting to threaten the CIA’s poppy harvest.

    Trump = sellout

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  105. https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-05-09/obamacare-taxes-aren-t-necessarily-going-away-gop-senators-say

    The fix is in and Trump will sign whatever they send to his desk.

    Trump, Mister Softee, won’t veto anything.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  106. Ray Dalio, head of Bridgewater, on Comey. Comey used to work there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Remember that if Hillary had gotten in, she would have fired Comey in a New York minute for almost costing her the election (and she would have been right). But now Comey is suddenly the untouchable Guardian of the Republic.
    , @Yak-15
    Curiously, this tweet did not emerge 6 months ago.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. @Dahlia
    The Dems apparently are going to try to ride "Russia collusion" back into power.

    The trouble for them is that many of the grown-ups, the people in charge, actually believe it. It can't be good to have your best minds in the grip of growing incoherence and delusion. And you know, I think Trump recognizes this on an intuitive level; he antagonizes them so they can never get back to being mentally sound.

    The trouble for them is that many of the grown-ups, the people in charge, actually believe it. It can’t be good to have your best minds in the grip of growing incoherence and delusion. And you know, I think Trump recognizes this on an intuitive level; he antagonizes them so they can never get back to being mentally sound.

    This is something I kind of figured too. On the (qualified) assumption that there isn’t actually anything there of substance to find, it’s possible that Trump or his people have seen some interest in dragging this out, forcing the Democrats to waste months, maybe the better part of the first half of his first term, talking about a story that is going to evaporate, and which is going to make them and the media look stupid and crazy. Assuming he didn’t actually do anything wrong, he has an information advantage here (he knows that they’re not going to find anything under all of the smoke).

    Remember how last September during the campaign he suddenly declared the Obama birth certificate a closed issue, after having made it an issue for five years, which both let him assume the position of deciding when it was and wasn’t an issue and left the Democrats sputtering with rage. I could see that here sometime next year, during the midterms, maybe: “oh, the Russia thing? Here’s everything that shows there’s nothing to it. Sorry you wasted your time the last two years.” Feminist-types would call this “gaslighting.”

    As things stand, right now, it’s already happening Democrats (and, to a lesser extent, Republican #NeverTrumpers) are getting all publicly lathered up over hearing the same stories that have already been known for months confirmed by new people with no new additional information, in a way that makes them look kind of dumb and desperate (Comey confirming that there’s been an investigation which has been known at least since Heat Street broke it last November; Clapper confirming no evidence existed of collusion to his knowledge as of January; Sally Yates basically saying she told Don McGahn what everyone already knows: that Michael Flynn mislead Mike Pence). It’s sort of like hearing a story told by someone who has no sense of dramatic timing: they miss all of the cues as to what actually holds an audience’s interest.

    My guess has been that the probable worst-case scenario for Trump is that one or a few figures associated with him either during the campaign or the first hundred days wind up getting prosecuted but there aren’t any hard and fast links to him, basically Scooter Libby or the Watergate burglars. I wouldn’t be hugely surprised if Mike Flynn, Carter Page, or maybe Lewandoski gets charged with something. What the Democrats want though is a full-on revival of Watergate or Whitewater, where they can get a special prosecutor to dig into Trump’s affairs far and wide (like his tax returns) and fish for dirt completely unrelated to Russia.

    Here’s a question though that I’ve posed to a couple of people: assume that the Trump campaign actually did “coordinate” with Russia in some way during the campaign, say, by having knowledge that Russia had hacked materials from Clinton and was releasing them through Wikileaks and timing it’s communications around those releases. Would that actually be a crime (as opposed to a political scandal)? It’s highly questionable, at best. It’s not treason, defined in the Constitution as “levying war against [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort,” and Russia technically wasn’t an “enemy” of the United States. The most I could maybe potentially see is being an accessory after the fact to something Russia may have done (e.g., hacking crimes or espionage) if they did something, say, like help conceal it, or some abstruse Logan Act-type accusation. It’s hardly as if foreign countries (e.g., Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Mexico, China, etc., etc., etc.) haven’t played games in our domestic politics with the tacit and often not-so-tacit knowledge and cooperation of political campaigns and parties here for a long time. (It’s also worth asking: what is the plausible factual “theory of the case” to claim that Trump somehow “colluded” with Russia? What would he or his campaign be factually accused of doing? I’m assuming Trump didn’t have an army of black-hat hackers in the basement of Trump Tower sending phishing emails to John Podesta.)

    I’m guessing the legal technicalities might not matter if the political and media outrage is that bad and both the Democrats and Congressional Republicans figure they ought to sign off on articles of impeachment (assuming the Republicans want to be rid of Trump, and obviously the neocons want a new Cold War with Russia). But it’s worth pondering what exactly the accusations are and the charges would be.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Probably the only way that anyone gets prosecuted is for lying to the FBI so anyone with half a brain has already lawyered up and taken the 5th. In terms of underlying crimes, I really doubt that there were any that can be proved. So far it has all been Democrats blowing smoke. Even if some of the Trump guys once spoke to a Russian at some point in their lives, speaking to a Russian is not a crime unless you can prove what was said involved planning some illegal activity. If there was any discussion of illegal matters picked up by the NSA it would have leaked a thousand times by now and is probably not admissible in court anyway unless there was a warrant.

    Trump is not in a position to declare the Russia matter dead the way he declared the Obama birth certificate dead because he is not the one who brought the Russians up to begin with. The analogy would be for Schumer or Clinton to declare it dead and that's never going to happen.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Trump’s first foreign trip was to pledge fealty to his masters in Israel and Saudi Arabia.

    But his minders realized that the optics on that were a problem.

    So they added the Vatican and called it the Three Great Religions tour.

    Isn’t that clever?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  109. @Pat Boyle
    Yesterday I wrote that Comey was fired for being too tall. That was joke but there is something to it - strangely enough.

    iSteve is six four. I'm six four and my father was six four. Good solid stature you might say. But Comey is six eight - a whole different thing entirely.

    My father went to law school so he could be an FBI agent. But he never was an FBI agent. He was too tall - or at least that was the story I was always told while I was growing up. There was a persistent rumor in the sixties that J. Edgar Hoover wouldn't hire guys who were taller than he was.

    If you saw the James Coburn comedy "The President's Analyst" you might remember the scenes where the Hoover character sat on a box and was surrounded by all these tiny agents. The producers seemed to believe that Hoover preferred short agents.

    So maybe there is some kind of karma rebound effect operating.

    Apparently his staff guys are extremely tall as well. I’m 6’2 like DJT, and having 3 or 4 cops half a foot taller than me walk in to my office might make me a little nervous.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pat Boyle
    I read an article in "Psychology Today" about forty years ago that claimed that the optimum height for a man was six two. That's not much of an authoritative source but ever since I've used 6'2" as my estimate for the 'best' height. It sounds about right.

    I'm not extremely tall but I have trouble with airline seating and Italian cars. Industrial designers , I'm told, build their products for the 99th man. I'm near the edge.

    Yesterday when Comey got run out of town and was shipped out on a private jet back to DC, he looked very awkward getting up the ladder and through the little hatch. I used to fly around the country on business a lot. I used to say - 'I'm not afraid of flying - I'm afraid of flying coach'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. @Thomas

    The trouble for them is that many of the grown-ups, the people in charge, actually believe it. It can’t be good to have your best minds in the grip of growing incoherence and delusion. And you know, I think Trump recognizes this on an intuitive level; he antagonizes them so they can never get back to being mentally sound.
     
    This is something I kind of figured too. On the (qualified) assumption that there isn't actually anything there of substance to find, it's possible that Trump or his people have seen some interest in dragging this out, forcing the Democrats to waste months, maybe the better part of the first half of his first term, talking about a story that is going to evaporate, and which is going to make them and the media look stupid and crazy. Assuming he didn't actually do anything wrong, he has an information advantage here (he knows that they're not going to find anything under all of the smoke).

    Remember how last September during the campaign he suddenly declared the Obama birth certificate a closed issue, after having made it an issue for five years, which both let him assume the position of deciding when it was and wasn't an issue and left the Democrats sputtering with rage. I could see that here sometime next year, during the midterms, maybe: "oh, the Russia thing? Here's everything that shows there's nothing to it. Sorry you wasted your time the last two years." Feminist-types would call this "gaslighting."

    As things stand, right now, it's already happening Democrats (and, to a lesser extent, Republican #NeverTrumpers) are getting all publicly lathered up over hearing the same stories that have already been known for months confirmed by new people with no new additional information, in a way that makes them look kind of dumb and desperate (Comey confirming that there's been an investigation which has been known at least since Heat Street broke it last November; Clapper confirming no evidence existed of collusion to his knowledge as of January; Sally Yates basically saying she told Don McGahn what everyone already knows: that Michael Flynn mislead Mike Pence). It's sort of like hearing a story told by someone who has no sense of dramatic timing: they miss all of the cues as to what actually holds an audience's interest.

    My guess has been that the probable worst-case scenario for Trump is that one or a few figures associated with him either during the campaign or the first hundred days wind up getting prosecuted but there aren't any hard and fast links to him, basically Scooter Libby or the Watergate burglars. I wouldn't be hugely surprised if Mike Flynn, Carter Page, or maybe Lewandoski gets charged with something. What the Democrats want though is a full-on revival of Watergate or Whitewater, where they can get a special prosecutor to dig into Trump's affairs far and wide (like his tax returns) and fish for dirt completely unrelated to Russia.

    Here's a question though that I've posed to a couple of people: assume that the Trump campaign actually did "coordinate" with Russia in some way during the campaign, say, by having knowledge that Russia had hacked materials from Clinton and was releasing them through Wikileaks and timing it's communications around those releases. Would that actually be a crime (as opposed to a political scandal)? It's highly questionable, at best. It's not treason, defined in the Constitution as "levying war against [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort," and Russia technically wasn't an "enemy" of the United States. The most I could maybe potentially see is being an accessory after the fact to something Russia may have done (e.g., hacking crimes or espionage) if they did something, say, like help conceal it, or some abstruse Logan Act-type accusation. It's hardly as if foreign countries (e.g., Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Mexico, China, etc., etc., etc.) haven't played games in our domestic politics with the tacit and often not-so-tacit knowledge and cooperation of political campaigns and parties here for a long time. (It's also worth asking: what is the plausible factual "theory of the case" to claim that Trump somehow "colluded" with Russia? What would he or his campaign be factually accused of doing? I'm assuming Trump didn't have an army of black-hat hackers in the basement of Trump Tower sending phishing emails to John Podesta.)

    I'm guessing the legal technicalities might not matter if the political and media outrage is that bad and both the Democrats and Congressional Republicans figure they ought to sign off on articles of impeachment (assuming the Republicans want to be rid of Trump, and obviously the neocons want a new Cold War with Russia). But it's worth pondering what exactly the accusations are and the charges would be.

    Probably the only way that anyone gets prosecuted is for lying to the FBI so anyone with half a brain has already lawyered up and taken the 5th. In terms of underlying crimes, I really doubt that there were any that can be proved. So far it has all been Democrats blowing smoke. Even if some of the Trump guys once spoke to a Russian at some point in their lives, speaking to a Russian is not a crime unless you can prove what was said involved planning some illegal activity. If there was any discussion of illegal matters picked up by the NSA it would have leaked a thousand times by now and is probably not admissible in court anyway unless there was a warrant.

    Trump is not in a position to declare the Russia matter dead the way he declared the Obama birth certificate dead because he is not the one who brought the Russians up to begin with. The analogy would be for Schumer or Clinton to declare it dead and that’s never going to happen.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. @PiltdownMan

    While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..
     
    Huh? What does that even mean?

    "Thanks for tipping me off three times—you're a real pal—but I'm going to spill the beans and tell the whole world you did"?

    That little passage ensured it was the evening’s lead-in lead material. Even Trump partisans would have to admit it’s a bald-faced lie …maybe this is a signature Trump manœuvre from his previous world. A type of rubbing it in.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. @anon
    alternatively, if the russia story involved collusion between the dnc and the media to invent a probable cause to allow state surveillance which was then used politically then some of them are going to be worrying about jail

    watergate 2

    If collusion between the DNC and the media was a crime, then every MSM reporter in Washington would be in jail already.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. @Dahlia
    The Dems apparently are going to try to ride "Russia collusion" back into power.

    The trouble for them is that many of the grown-ups, the people in charge, actually believe it. It can't be good to have your best minds in the grip of growing incoherence and delusion. And you know, I think Trump recognizes this on an intuitive level; he antagonizes them so they can never get back to being mentally sound.

    It’s a wild ass bet but it’s all they got at this point. Sure they could play “loyal opposition” as is the norm in democratic societies, but where’s the fun in that?

    Chucky Schumer is a lot of things but crazy isn’t one of them. What’s the downside in this for him? At best, he gets real lucky and fans the embers into a real fire (he would be as surprised as anyone). At worst, he weakens Trump and puts him on the defensive. Instead of implementing his agenda, Trump spends all his time fending off investigations. Meanwhile, the DNC gets to fire up the base and has lots of material for fund raising campaigns. All the female Hillary believers are already disposed to think that Her Highness lost only because Trump conspired with the Russians.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. @(((Owen)))
    Inside the Democratic Party, the establishment is willing to follow the Russia conspiracy lunacy not matter how stupid it gets.

    They're not true believers, but it serves a purpose for them, a purpose far more important than any one election or any one presidency.

    To maintain control of the Democratic Party when the majority of its voters are infuriated by globalism and endless stupid wars, they need to discredit the pro-working families, anti-American empire liberals. Since those are exactly the people that are skeptical of Syrian war, opposed Iraq and Libya, and oppose oil companies and defense contractors running the party, they have to be positioned as tools for Trump or naïve fools.

    By focusing foreign policy on Russian conspiracies, Bernie and Tulsi Gabbard and the entire patriotic wing of the Democratic Party can be impeached. No one with integrity that isn't in the pockets of empire will harp on blaming Russia. Anyone that wanted to stay out of Syria's civil war can be tarred as Russia apologists.

    And the Democratic establishment can keep the party in the hands of warmongers because they're trained the base to hate Russia above all else. That's the point here: If you aren't a base Democrat, you aren't the audience. They're not trying to beat Trump with the Russia story. They're trying to keep control of a party that is made up of the very people they want to betray most.

    Big if true.

    I say this one is a good candidate for a gold box, Steve

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. @keuril
    Ray Dalio, head of Bridgewater, on Comey. Comey used to work there.
    https://twitter.com/RayDalio/status/862305040190590977

    Remember that if Hillary had gotten in, she would have fired Comey in a New York minute for almost costing her the election (and she would have been right). But now Comey is suddenly the untouchable Guardian of the Republic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. @Anonymous
    There is no wall happening. No deportations to speak of. No workplace enforcement. No end to the document/ID/tax fraud by illegals.

    But the bogus refugee program remains fully funded.

    HB visas increasing in various categories.

    HE'S SETTING THE STAGE FOR AMNESTY.

    I THINK YOUR CAPS KEY IS STUCK.

    Setting the stage? Wake us when the curtain lifts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    I think Democrats are upset for a reason they’re trying to cover up. With the Justice Department in Republican hands and the last big Obama holdover gone from the FBI, it’s possible to start investigating and prosecuting Democratic public officials for stealing from the public till and for various other wrongdoings that they’ve been committing with a free hand for the last 8 years. The Obama administration winked at everything their own pols did with the mentality of a third-world government.

    The Democrats are terrified. We can starting going after them in their strongholds and weaken them there. Big city Democratic officials are usually insanely corrupt, and both they and we know it. Their yammering mouthpieces in the press are trying to prevent this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sammler
    This is the real battle. A good FBI head will focus the organization on investigating governmental corruption; other crimes should be the jurisdiction of State or local police.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. @Ed
    Doctors Without Borders is not an open border organization. It's just that the doctors go treat the sick regardless of political situation around the globe.

    Right, it’s just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It’s just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hockamaw

    Right, it’s just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It’s just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.
     
    LOL are you serious man?? It's Doctors Without Borders not some communist conspiracy. Get a grip.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. As others have noted, the Left’s reaction on cable news has been at DEFCON 1 in terms of sheer hysteria and sputtering rage. The term “constitutional crises” and “Nixonian” has been bandied about a good deal; so have comparisons to Nixon’s so-called “Saturday Night Massacre” back in 1973, when he fired the hyper-partisan Archibald Cox as Watergate special prosecutor – whom Nixon had been foolish to allow to be appointed in the first place.

    But the real question now is whether Trump truly will be “Nixonian,” in the sense that he will allow himself to be bullied and cowed into going down the foolish “special prosecutor” route, just as he allowed himself to be talked into withdrawing Travel Ban #1 for a watered down Travel Ban #2, only to see the second one also corralled by liberal federal judges with ideological axes to grind.

    What brought Nixon down was not what G. Gordon Liddy cooked up in 1972, but how the president handled it all in 1973. Had Nixon simply come out and said “no special prosecutor; no cooperation from my administration with anybody on some waste-of-time investigation over some silly political prank; no tapes for no one, period; and pardons for all involved in the silly thing just because I want to,” there would have been a lot of temporary hysteria from the liberal media and the Democrats just like we’re seeing now over Trump’s firing of Comey, but Watergate would have sunk into an asterisk to the history of the Nixon administration, instead of the debacle it became.

    Instead, Nixon’s otherwise-sharp political survival instincts abandoned him just at the time in his career he needed them the most: he became racked with hesitancy, indecision, and fumbling attempts to contain the scandal, rather than just contemptuously dismiss it as the partisan exercise it most certainly was in the beginning. Richard Nixon himself fed that exercise the fuel that turned it into a criminal matter, and that ultimately consumed his presidency. Why Nixon EVER consented to being a party in federal court over the possession of his tapes when he could have simply brushed any judicial order regarding them aside with a constitutionally compelling separation of powers claim – just like the 35 presidents* before him, starting with George Washington, would have and in some cases HAD done – remains an astonishing example of his bizarre consent to his own political ruin.

    In any event, the bottom line is that this will only become Watergate II if Trump allows it to become Watergate II. Whether a special prosecutor – if Trump is foolish enough to allow one to be appointed – finds any “smoking gun” evidence that the 2016 campaign colluded in some way with the Russians is really irrelevant: what Democrats are really salivating about now on cable news – openly! – is the chance for a special prosecutor to get his or her hands on Trump’s tax returns.

    And the Grand Old Party? Per usual, about half of them are wringing their wrists, sniveling about how this all just gives them a tummy ache. There should be a new medical requirement that local Republican state conventions should impose on aspiring office-holders: before any candidate for any office in the land can run in a GOP primary, they should be required to undergo an x-ray at a medical clinic certifying the presence of a spinal column, and, for male candidates, a scrotum sack with all the expected contents therein accounted for. Because a good half of the current crop seem to lack that equipment.

    *Grover Cleveland messes up the number of presidencies versus the number of men who have been president mathematical tidiness.

    Read More
    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  120. @Schnexnayder
    Steve, what's the point of pretending that you don't understand a position that's obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent (whether or not you agree with that position)? The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed. You’re allowed to take into account whether he’s the lesser of two evils. And from their point of view that's what he was, even aside from the investigation of links to Russia, because he’d likely be replaced by someone more nakedly partisan. What clinches it is that dismissing him when he’s investigating Trump over Russia works against the independence of the FBI.

    ^ Always misses the point that if Russia hacked everything to help Trump they did us a favor in letting us know how awful Hillary is

    So in acknowledging that Hillary is not fit to be President and that Democrats want low information voters, we are left with the wafer thin position that Trump is somehow a Russian puppet

    Which there is no evidence of and is vague and unprovable, and is still better than Clinton the Soros puppet

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. @Jonathan Mason
    The whole of the Federal Goverment seems to revolve around the idea of "classified" information and leaks thereof.

    Most nations do not have much classified information and the individual states don't seem to have it at all. Obviously there needs to be some method of sharing information about private conversations with world leaders and important military secrets among top government officials, but people like Huma Abedin should not even have access to such information.

    Nothing has been or can be revealed about the nature of the "classified" information that Huma Abedin allowed to reach the laptop of her husband, known to the press as "disgraced sex-pervert Anthony Weiner", but it can probably be assumed that this information is in the hands of Israel,or potentially so.

    Comey's revelations about the Huma Abedin emails just before the election were just innuendo, revealing absolutely nothing about what secrets had been given away, but implying that vast tranches of top secret information were involved, when probably the information was nothing more than Hillary Clinton's pantie size.

    This may or may not have influenced the result of the election. Nobody can really tell, but Comey should have known that potentially it could influence some voters.

    In spite of an FBI investigation, Comey was apparently unable to determine whether anyone had ever told Mrs. Clinton she was supposed to use a State Department email server and email address for official communications. He apparently believed that Mrs. Clinton probably spent most of her taxpayer-paid time at State dashing off 30,00 now deleted emails planning Chelsea's wedding.

    Comey needed to be fired, as he is a complete dick, as evidence by his ludicrous testimony to the Senate Oversight Committee explaining how he makes decisions in terms of "seeing open gates".

    The whole of the Federal Gover[n]ment seems to revolve around the idea of “classified” information and leaks thereof.

    Excessive secrecy is the the natural outcome of any bureaucratic state. Knowledge is power. In the Soviet Union even street maps and the phone book were state secrets.

    The difference in America is that the government leaks like a sieve in the interest of politics. The bureaucracy (the “Deep State”) is supposed to be neutral but it isn’t. (DC voted 93% for Hillary – better than Fidel Castro could have done in a fair election). As the rest of the country shifts toward being more and more “red” the blue bureaucracy is forced to wage a anti-democratic rear guard action through selective leaking, judges blocking Presidential decrees, blue local governments ignoring Federal mandates, etc. It’s really a recipe for civil war, unfortunately.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    Excessive secrecy is the the natural outcome of any bureaucratic state. Knowledge is power.
     
    Well, yes of course. None of we the peons have any knowledge at all of what this classified information sent by Huma Abedin was. Perhaps a link to a web site that allows the user to re-rout in-flight Tomahawk missiles to strike the silo from which they were launched. Or probably not.

    So this classified game of 3-D chess can only be played by those who have clearance to classify information and see information classified by others.

    However, as others have hinted here, I believe Comey may have been playing a different game. Perhaps he assumed that the election was a foregone conclusion. After all, Irish bookmakers had already paid out on an assumed victory for Hillary, and if you can't trust an Irish bookmaker, whom can you trust? Rather than make a statement to Congress when President Clinton II had already taken office, it would be neat to do it just before the election when it would quickly be forgotten by nearly everyone, then, if necessary, Hillary could later issue pardons to all concerned and still appoint Huma Abedin as White House Chief of Staff.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. @yaqub the mad scientist
    Of course he is. To these people, common law, bicameral legislatures, individualism, separation of church and state, an armed citizenry, technological innovation, and such isn't culture- fancy tribal clothes and spicy dishes are. And he's right. The former isn't culture, it's civilization. People from "cultures" come to "enrich" civilization.

    This dichotomy cannot be stressed enough.

    common law, bicameral legislatures, individualism, separation of church and state, an armed citizenry, technological innovation

    We got those from the Romans, who stole them from the Greeks, who stole them from the Egyptians, who were really black anyway. And anything we didn’t get from the Romans we got from the medieval Muslims who saved civilization. So, you see, white people are parasites whose only culture had to be taken from others.

    /sarcasm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. @(((Owen)))
    Inside the Democratic Party, the establishment is willing to follow the Russia conspiracy lunacy not matter how stupid it gets.

    They're not true believers, but it serves a purpose for them, a purpose far more important than any one election or any one presidency.

    To maintain control of the Democratic Party when the majority of its voters are infuriated by globalism and endless stupid wars, they need to discredit the pro-working families, anti-American empire liberals. Since those are exactly the people that are skeptical of Syrian war, opposed Iraq and Libya, and oppose oil companies and defense contractors running the party, they have to be positioned as tools for Trump or naïve fools.

    By focusing foreign policy on Russian conspiracies, Bernie and Tulsi Gabbard and the entire patriotic wing of the Democratic Party can be impeached. No one with integrity that isn't in the pockets of empire will harp on blaming Russia. Anyone that wanted to stay out of Syria's civil war can be tarred as Russia apologists.

    And the Democratic establishment can keep the party in the hands of warmongers because they're trained the base to hate Russia above all else. That's the point here: If you aren't a base Democrat, you aren't the audience. They're not trying to beat Trump with the Russia story. They're trying to keep control of a party that is made up of the very people they want to betray most.

    And the Democratic establishment can keep the party in the hands of warmongers because they’re trained the base to hate Russia above all else.

    Yes, the left is famous for its hatred of Russia and all things Soviet. The US has always been at war with Putinstan. That thing with Hillary and the RESET button never happened.

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary’s coronation. Stalin killing millions – crickets. But messin’ with Hill – them’s fightin’ words.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary’s coronation. Stalin killing millions – crickets. But messin’ with Hill – them’s fightin’ words.
     
    Please stop it. The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia, and Stalin wasn't even ethnically a Russian. This is the sort of pisswater analysis one hears on the Rush Limbaugh show. The Fat One still believes that the most astonishing thing to transpire since November 8th was the transformation of US Democrats into Russia-haters. But this line of thinking takes at face value all the allegations of Russia hacking the election, even though these are completely fabricated.

    There was no Russian hacking. None whatsoever. The Democrats are so unhinged that they're willing to bring us to the brink of war with a nuclear superpower over false allegations spun solely for domestic political consumption. This is extremely dangerous.

    And unlike (((Owen))) above, I believe they are serious about it. Not that they really believe the idiotic hacking accusations, but they really are spoiling for war with Russia. I maintain the opinion that our globalist elite would consider a nuclear exchange that leaves Russia 100% destroyed and the USA only 80% destroyed to be an acceptable scenario. This is precisely what they are trying to engineer with NATO expansion, SDI, Super-fuzing, and troop deployments in Europe. These people are insane and need to be stopped.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. @Ed
    Doctors Without Borders is not an open border organization. It's just that the doctors go treat the sick regardless of political situation around the globe.

    What 27 year old said. It is in practice an open-the-borders organisation. They are, for example, prominent in the Calais “refugee” camps – as we know, the French don’t have any doctors of their own.

    http://www.msf.org/en/article/france-calais-%E2%80%98jungle%E2%80%99-about-be-dismantled-what-will-become-unaccompanied-minors

    They also have the largest “rescue ship” picking up illegal immigrants a few miles off the Libyan coast and ferrying them to Europe.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/refugee-crisis-msf-syria-mediterranean-sea-deaths-rescue-ships-bourbon-argos-libya-operation-sophia-a7394021.html

    https://www.msf.org.uk/country/mediterranean-search-and-rescue

    Read More
    • Replies: @BB753
    Yes, to me Doctors without Borders is a terrorist organization, by their involvement in the open borders scheme and by making sure Africa through medical care keeps growing exponentially until it explodes demographically.
    Typical self-righteous bastards making the world a miserable place for everyone while believing they're doing God's work.
    Together with Greenpeace, they deserve to be dismantled for the good of humanity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    Apparently his staff guys are extremely tall as well. I'm 6'2 like DJT, and having 3 or 4 cops half a foot taller than me walk in to my office might make me a little nervous.

    I read an article in “Psychology Today” about forty years ago that claimed that the optimum height for a man was six two. That’s not much of an authoritative source but ever since I’ve used 6’2″ as my estimate for the ‘best’ height. It sounds about right.

    I’m not extremely tall but I have trouble with airline seating and Italian cars. Industrial designers , I’m told, build their products for the 99th man. I’m near the edge.

    Yesterday when Comey got run out of town and was shipped out on a private jet back to DC, he looked very awkward getting up the ladder and through the little hatch. I used to fly around the country on business a lot. I used to say – ‘I’m not afraid of flying – I’m afraid of flying coach’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    The ideal height of a soldier or fighter is said to be significantly lower than that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. @Mr. Anon

    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not “push around” the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.
     
    Just maybe, in a republic, there ought not to be a "national police". At least not one like we have.

    The FBI has been rotten from the start.

    It’s true that the Founding Fathers thought that law enforcement was largely a state matter and that we lived without a national police force* for the 1st 150 years of the Republic, but what did they know about fighting tyranny?

    *Other than the highly decentralized US Marshals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. @Don Bass
    @pat Boyle.
    Re the height thing. Tall men stand out. Are noticed. An agent often just wants to be in the background, a "nobody"... If you're 6-4, you're going to be seen.

    Of course. That was why Sean Connery was such an improbable ‘Secret Agent’. Tall, and incredibly handsome. Daniel Craig is much more plausible.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. Who could be a better judge of Trump going insane due to untreated venereal disease, than this bona fide leg- spreading author of “My Horizontal Life: A Collection of One-Night Stands” ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  129. @The Z Blog
    Trump is proving to be an entertaining politician. He is not necessarily good for my issues, but he is a different breed of cat than we have been seeing for 30 years. Last week all the fake news outlets were saying how Trump probably should have canned Comey, but now it was too late. Then Trump fires Comey.

    I've been calling Trump the Mule for almost two years now. He is not a a reformer or another guy with a vision that looks like the status quo. He is the destroyer of worlds.

    I dislike calling Trump “the Mule” because it relies on mapping the globalist ruling class to the Second Foundation. Which is far more credit than they deserve; they have proven incapable of any planning beyond grabbing what they can and hoping the insoluble problems will somehow go away.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. @Anon
    I think Democrats are upset for a reason they're trying to cover up. With the Justice Department in Republican hands and the last big Obama holdover gone from the FBI, it's possible to start investigating and prosecuting Democratic public officials for stealing from the public till and for various other wrongdoings that they've been committing with a free hand for the last 8 years. The Obama administration winked at everything their own pols did with the mentality of a third-world government.

    The Democrats are terrified. We can starting going after them in their strongholds and weaken them there. Big city Democratic officials are usually insanely corrupt, and both they and we know it. Their yammering mouthpieces in the press are trying to prevent this.

    This is the real battle. A good FBI head will focus the organization on investigating governmental corruption; other crimes should be the jurisdiction of State or local police.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. @27 year old
    Right, it's just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It's just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.

    Right, it’s just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It’s just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.

    LOL are you serious man?? It’s Doctors Without Borders not some communist conspiracy. Get a grip.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pericles
    Well, they still do things like

    Medical aid charity Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) says it will no longer take funds from the European Union in protest at its migration policy.
    MSF singled out the EU's deal with Turkey under which Turkey agreed to take back any migrants who crossed the sea to Greece in smugglers' boats.
    ...
    "MSF announces today that we will no longer take funds from the EU and its Member States in protest at their shameful deterrence policies and their intensification of efforts to push people back from European shores," the group said in a statement.

     

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36558694

    So I don't consider them to be on our side. My side.
    , @Anonymous Nephew
    "The Bourbon Argos is journeying towards what has become the deadliest sea crossing in the world, on a mission to save the lives of some of the hundreds of thousands of refugees continuing to risk their lives in desperate attempts to reach safety in Europe. The ship, run by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), is the largest humanitarian vessel patrolling the Mediterranean Sea, rescuing or transporting 8,534 migrants in the past six months alone."

    They pick them up a mile or two off the Libyan coast and, rather than take them the few miles back to where they sailed from, ferry them hundreds of miles to Europe.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/refugee-crisis-msf-syria-mediterranean-sea-deaths-rescue-ships-bourbon-argos-libya-operation-sophia-a7394021.html

    , @Jack Hanson
    And here we have conspiracy used as a rejoinder when the facts are white obvious. Your masters aren't getting their money's worth.
    , @27 year old
    A communist conspiracy would be an improvement over what they are.
    , @Brutusale
    They themselves seem to disagree with your disagreement.

    http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/article/msf-mediterranean-two-days-three-ships-1300-rescued

    THREE ships picking up migrants.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. OT, but sort of related……

    What’s happening with #MacronLeaks? Haven’t seen anything on it in the MSM since the election. Was it all just a damp squib?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  133. @JohnnyD
    I'm confused. I thought I was suppose to hate Comey for costing America's greatest leader, Hillary Clinton, the election. Now, I'm supposed to see Comey as a good guy, a martyr for American democracy, who was fired before he could tell us how Trump and Putin stole the election from Hillary. There's nothing Orwellian about that...

    We’ve always been at war with Eastasia.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. @Hockamaw

    Right, it’s just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It’s just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.
     
    LOL are you serious man?? It's Doctors Without Borders not some communist conspiracy. Get a grip.

    Well, they still do things like

    Medical aid charity Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) says it will no longer take funds from the European Union in protest at its migration policy.
    MSF singled out the EU’s deal with Turkey under which Turkey agreed to take back any migrants who crossed the sea to Greece in smugglers’ boats.

    “MSF announces today that we will no longer take funds from the EU and its Member States in protest at their shameful deterrence policies and their intensification of efforts to push people back from European shores,” the group said in a statement.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36558694

    So I don’t consider them to be on our side. My side.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Comey fired himself. I am not technically savey enough to find it but during comeys most recent testimony he essentially stated he would prefer being home with his family than working for the FBI. I remember thinking, then go be with your family. A statement like this to a business minded Trump leaves no dilemma. If you don’t want to work for me OK you don’t have to, go home.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Didn't Trump say something similar about himself in a recent Reuters interview?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. NOTA says:
    @nebulafox
    Ooh-did you do condensed matter theory?

    J. Edgar Hoover was a horrible little man, but that was his job. You don't want nice guys as your *de facto* secret police chief, you want mean, workaholic bastards with a nagging, obsessive, detail-oriented personality. Also, I guarantee that all the bien-pensants lionizing FBI power right now would have been decrying Hoover as a crypto-Nazi two years ago, ditto the security state in general. Trump is very lucky to have such obviously stupid/hypocritical opponents-not that he won't find a way to piss that advantage away, granted, but still.

    There are about 10% of the people expressing opinions who actually have principles, and oppose the surveillance state, the latest war, the next bailout of oligarchs, deficit spending, obstructionism in congress, etc., as a matter of principle. The other 90% hate those things when it’s the other side doing them, but favor them when it’s their side.

    It’s worth noticing which people have principles, and which ones just have a side. The ones with principles are often worth listening to even when you disagree with them, because they’re their own men and say what they believe; the others are not worth your time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nebulafox
    Times like these make me proud to be a political independent. I haven't always done a good job of sticking to my principles, but I plan on doing so more in the future and being in that 10%.

    I respect the hell out of Pat Buchanan and Ralph Nader, even though I think some of the things both men have said over the years are absolutely nutty. (I also think that both men have said absolutely brilliant things.) But I also think they say what they mean and mean what they say. I think it is no coincidence that they respected each other. Or, as a matter of fact, that Goldwater and McGovern were friends.

    As a side note, I believe the current left/right paradigm is dying, and should die. We will see common alliances between actual conservatives and actual liberals in the pre-1992 (in some ways, pre-1980s, or even pre-1960s for some of the more nauseating features of the Left) sense of the word, who wish to ally to practically get things done while throwing both the SJWs and the Norquist/neocon types overboard. That scares the hell out of the bipartisan, oligarchic elite responsible for America's current messes, and well it should. Deep down, nationalism and social democracy are very much allies, when you think about it, just as the open borders/social justice crowd are something out of a dream of libertarians and plutocrats. And when it comes to no more stupid wars of choice in the Middle East that produce these refugee flows in the first place, that's definitely a uniting issue, as Buchanan and Nader have both pointed out.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. @AaronNYC
    Clearly, Trump fired Comey because he wasn't happy with his performance on the Russia investigation since the inauguration. Otherwise, why didn't he fire him on day one? It certainly doesn't look good. Oh, and the reason why Sailer hasn't been "keeping up" with the Comey news is that he is a Trump fan, and isn't that interested in talking about things when Trump looks stupid; it goes against the alt-right grain of the website.

    Newsflash: much of the alt-right has more or less abandoned Trump since his Syria strikes. It includes the majority of the commenters on the Syria strikes thread a month ago.

    Read More
    • Disagree: Opinionator
    • Replies: @Anonym
    I don't think so. DACA though...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. @Jack D

    The whole of the Federal Gover[n]ment seems to revolve around the idea of “classified” information and leaks thereof.
     
    Excessive secrecy is the the natural outcome of any bureaucratic state. Knowledge is power. In the Soviet Union even street maps and the phone book were state secrets.

    The difference in America is that the government leaks like a sieve in the interest of politics. The bureaucracy (the "Deep State") is supposed to be neutral but it isn't. (DC voted 93% for Hillary - better than Fidel Castro could have done in a fair election). As the rest of the country shifts toward being more and more "red" the blue bureaucracy is forced to wage a anti-democratic rear guard action through selective leaking, judges blocking Presidential decrees, blue local governments ignoring Federal mandates, etc. It's really a recipe for civil war, unfortunately.

    Excessive secrecy is the the natural outcome of any bureaucratic state. Knowledge is power.

    Well, yes of course. None of we the peons have any knowledge at all of what this classified information sent by Huma Abedin was. Perhaps a link to a web site that allows the user to re-rout in-flight Tomahawk missiles to strike the silo from which they were launched. Or probably not.

    So this classified game of 3-D chess can only be played by those who have clearance to classify information and see information classified by others.

    However, as others have hinted here, I believe Comey may have been playing a different game. Perhaps he assumed that the election was a foregone conclusion. After all, Irish bookmakers had already paid out on an assumed victory for Hillary, and if you can’t trust an Irish bookmaker, whom can you trust? Rather than make a statement to Congress when President Clinton II had already taken office, it would be neat to do it just before the election when it would quickly be forgotten by nearly everyone, then, if necessary, Hillary could later issue pardons to all concerned and still appoint Huma Abedin as White House Chief of Staff.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. @Lot
    You really have to read Trump's nasty letter to Comey. It is so bad I had to double check it wasn't a fake.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-letter-to-james-comey-telling-him-he-is-fired-read-the-full-letter/article/2622610

    I don't think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.

    What is most crazy, is that Comey's recent scandal is that he seems to have publicly lied about Hillary's dear Huma regularly emailing confidential government docs to print to her Wiener. This was to Trump's benefit, before the election.

    The mental image of Comey's lie was awfully plausible too, Huma the #2 to the President-in-waiting, telling her unemployed husband to "plz print" random e-mails like a baby-boomer boss to his underlings.

    So this is either erratic behavior by Trump, a touching act of probity by Trump, or both. Trump keeps me guessing! He did purge Christie for sleazy acts against Democrats, so maybe he just is really concerned about running a clean White House.

    It may have been nasty but it gave me a frisson of…je ne sais quoi.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lot
    Sure, humiliating public firings are entertaining for third parties. They also make enemies in a way that saying "Please tender me your resignation" does not. This is why this method of firing people is far more common.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. @Mr. Blank
    Steve, your reaction was almost identical to mine. I immediately posted something on Facebook snarkily asking my friends to remind me where the Comey Conventional Wisdom ping-pong was at when it stopped so I could figure out whether I was supposed to cheer or boo.

    Such uncertainty could provide a resonant Zen slap right into the realm of Stoic nonreaction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. @Schnexnayder
    Steve, what's the point of pretending that you don't understand a position that's obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent (whether or not you agree with that position)? The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed. You’re allowed to take into account whether he’s the lesser of two evils. And from their point of view that's what he was, even aside from the investigation of links to Russia, because he’d likely be replaced by someone more nakedly partisan. What clinches it is that dismissing him when he’s investigating Trump over Russia works against the independence of the FBI.

    Steve, what’s the point of pretending that you don’t understand a position that’s obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent …
    The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed.

    – Just to be clear, the standard for firing someone from top management is not “breaking the law” but something akin to “this guy’s performance is definitely below the mean/median value of the expected performance of the best person i could replace him with.” Comey’s not a school teacher or paper pusher in the city planning office. He’s the FBI director. This is a county of 320 million people, many of them–including many in the FBI ranks–highly competent. If Comey’s not doing a superior job, he should go. He’s not entitled to just take up space.

    Now given that, your “perfectly straightforward and consistent” just means the Democrats’ howling and mewling is perfectly consistent with their political interests –Trump bashing. Well Duh. But it’s not consistent in terms of any sort of disinterested standard like “highest quality performance from FBI director”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. @Schnexnayder
    Steve, what's the point of pretending that you don't understand a position that's obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent (whether or not you agree with that position)? The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed. You’re allowed to take into account whether he’s the lesser of two evils. And from their point of view that's what he was, even aside from the investigation of links to Russia, because he’d likely be replaced by someone more nakedly partisan. What clinches it is that dismissing him when he’s investigating Trump over Russia works against the independence of the FBI.

    Sounds like SS is mentioning his lack of cable because, to be fair, we should be giving him a bit more money.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. @Pat Boyle
    I read an article in "Psychology Today" about forty years ago that claimed that the optimum height for a man was six two. That's not much of an authoritative source but ever since I've used 6'2" as my estimate for the 'best' height. It sounds about right.

    I'm not extremely tall but I have trouble with airline seating and Italian cars. Industrial designers , I'm told, build their products for the 99th man. I'm near the edge.

    Yesterday when Comey got run out of town and was shipped out on a private jet back to DC, he looked very awkward getting up the ladder and through the little hatch. I used to fly around the country on business a lot. I used to say - 'I'm not afraid of flying - I'm afraid of flying coach'.

    The ideal height of a soldier or fighter is said to be significantly lower than that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pat Boyle
    I'm sure you're right. I remember seeing some rock climbers at Yosemite. They were shorter than me but much more wiry. Different activities call for different optimum physiques. Not too many Sumo wrestlers scaling El Capitan.

    The article to which I referred tested against the activity of applying for a job. So - according to them - a guy who is six two is optimum. I'd be a little to big and the average guy would be too short. Please remember this was just an article in a pop psychology magazine.

    What is the optimum height for combat?
    , @PV van der Byl
    For good reason, no infantryman wants to be noticeably taller than the others in his squad or platoon.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  145. Firing Comey is just one more instance in which Trump surprises people because they think the President can’t do a certain thing because the “right time” has already passed. He did this with the health care bill also: supposedly the initial failure to pass legislation meant he couldn’t do it at all, or at least not before the 2018 elections.

    I don’t think Trump pays these supposed restrictions any mind.

    My guess is that this is his attitude about many other issues — such as, say, The Wall. I think he believes he can just come back to these issues when he happens to think the time is ripe.

    Now probably the timing of some things really aren’t up to him, not least because others will not grant him enough political capital to do them if he isn’t successful enough earlier on.

    But I would expect that Trump, being perhaps the most resilient politician and certainly President we have known, does not lack any confidence in his ability to go after any issue he wants, any time he wants, if the time otherwise seems ripe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  146. @Schnexnayder
    Steve, what's the point of pretending that you don't understand a position that's obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent (whether or not you agree with that position)? The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed. You’re allowed to take into account whether he’s the lesser of two evils. And from their point of view that's what he was, even aside from the investigation of links to Russia, because he’d likely be replaced by someone more nakedly partisan. What clinches it is that dismissing him when he’s investigating Trump over Russia works against the independence of the FBI.

    Thanks for noticing, i-Steve style.

    Comey’s firing was forthcoming. Trump waited until it was tenable. Regardless, his removal does not stop the investigation. There are two federal grand juries underway, one focused on a RICO case and the other focused on a FARA case. The prosecutors are getting their ducks in a row…they know if they shoot and miss, it makes even more likely Trump will get a second term.

    Are the Clintons crooks? Yes. Throw them in jail.

    Has Trump engaged in similar shady business practices to enrich himself? Yes.

    So, to me, let’s find out Trump, the “God-Emperor”, is pulling the wool over people’s eyes by touting populist while securing his own business dealings post-president. What are y’all afraid of?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    There are no quote marks around God Emperor of Man.
    , @map
    He is not securing anything post-president. His businesses are dead as going concerns if he leaves office and if he fails to clear his enemies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. This may have been the funniest comment on this so far:

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05-10/caught-video-hockey-playing-putin-reacts-comey-termination

    Anyway, can we have Chris Christie as the replacement now? The lulz will never end.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  148. @Hockamaw

    Right, it’s just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It’s just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.
     
    LOL are you serious man?? It's Doctors Without Borders not some communist conspiracy. Get a grip.

    “The Bourbon Argos is journeying towards what has become the deadliest sea crossing in the world, on a mission to save the lives of some of the hundreds of thousands of refugees continuing to risk their lives in desperate attempts to reach safety in Europe. The ship, run by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), is the largest humanitarian vessel patrolling the Mediterranean Sea, rescuing or transporting 8,534 migrants in the past six months alone.”

    They pick them up a mile or two off the Libyan coast and, rather than take them the few miles back to where they sailed from, ferry them hundreds of miles to Europe.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/refugee-crisis-msf-syria-mediterranean-sea-deaths-rescue-ships-bourbon-argos-libya-operation-sophia-a7394021.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Corvinus
    Thanks for noticing, i-Steve style.

    Comey's firing was forthcoming. Trump waited until it was tenable. Regardless, his removal does not stop the investigation. There are two federal grand juries underway, one focused on a RICO case and the other focused on a FARA case. The prosecutors are getting their ducks in a row...they know if they shoot and miss, it makes even more likely Trump will get a second term.

    Are the Clintons crooks? Yes. Throw them in jail.

    Has Trump engaged in similar shady business practices to enrich himself? Yes.

    So, to me, let's find out Trump, the "God-Emperor", is pulling the wool over people's eyes by touting populist while securing his own business dealings post-president. What are y'all afraid of?

    There are no quote marks around God Emperor of Man.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "There are no quote marks around God Emperor of Man."

    Trump is not a God Emperor. There are those on the Alt Right who call him by that title. The only God Emperor is God Himself in His glory.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. @PhysicistDave
    Lot wrote:

    I don’t think what appears to be the gratuitous humiliation of an FBI director is good politics. I know a lot of presidents found it prudent to keep Hoover in office.
     
    Yeah, because Hoover had dossiers on all of them, their families, their associates, etc.

    Hoover was not a nice man.

    Dave

    I wonder what Roy Cohn would have done

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. @Daniel Chieh
    There are no quote marks around God Emperor of Man.

    “There are no quote marks around God Emperor of Man.”

    Trump is not a God Emperor. There are those on the Alt Right who call him by that title. The only God Emperor is God Himself in His glory.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Heresy. Those who speak against the God Emperor shall know the wrath of His fury.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. @gilgongo
    Comey fired himself. I am not technically savey enough to find it but during comeys most recent testimony he essentially stated he would prefer being home with his family than working for the FBI. I remember thinking, then go be with your family. A statement like this to a business minded Trump leaves no dilemma. If you don't want to work for me OK you don't have to, go home.

    Didn’t Trump say something similar about himself in a recent Reuters interview?

    Read More
    • Replies: @gilgongo
    I believe you are correct. I think I had the same reaction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  154. @reiner Tor
    Well, I guess one of the shortest books ever written was "The American Culture" or something...

    Well, I guess one of the shortest books ever written was “The American Culture” or something…

    I always recommend Albion’s Seed as a good place to start

    https://www.amazon.com/Albions-Seed-British-Folkways-Cultural/dp/1522668314

    Read More
    • Replies: @syonredux
    Here's shorthand version by Audacious Epigone

    Euronation
    America is a white nation.

    America is a Christian nation.

    America is an Anglophone nation.

    America is a nation built and led by white men.

    America is a heterosexual nation.

    America is a nation of male breadwinners and female homemakers.

    America is a nation of natives born on its soil.

    http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2017/04/euronation.html
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. @Kylie
    It may have been nasty but it gave me a frisson of...je ne sais quoi.

    Sure, humiliating public firings are entertaining for third parties. They also make enemies in a way that saying “Please tender me your resignation” does not. This is why this method of firing people is far more common.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    I suspect the notion of a public execution is more for the sake of the public and less for the sake of the doomed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. @Opinionator
    Didn't Trump say something similar about himself in a recent Reuters interview?

    I believe you are correct. I think I had the same reaction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. @Corvinus
    "There are no quote marks around God Emperor of Man."

    Trump is not a God Emperor. There are those on the Alt Right who call him by that title. The only God Emperor is God Himself in His glory.

    Heresy. Those who speak against the God Emperor shall know the wrath of His fury.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Heresy. Those who speak against the God Emperor shall know the wrath of His fury."

    If you an adherent to a particular faith, there is only one God, who is Emperor of Man (trigger warning). If you are choosing Trump over God, it is YOU who will incur God's wrath.

    John 17:3 — And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

    Now, if you are an atheist, then it does matter if you trumpet Trump...you're still going to hell for not taking God into your heart. Win-win for the side of "good".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. @Lot
    Sure, humiliating public firings are entertaining for third parties. They also make enemies in a way that saying "Please tender me your resignation" does not. This is why this method of firing people is far more common.

    I suspect the notion of a public execution is more for the sake of the public and less for the sake of the doomed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. Ah, to hell with all this stuff.

    CNN rejoices that Pepe Is Dead…

    …but the Rabbit of Sailer meme is just getting started.

    https://www.instagram.com/marlonbundo/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20170510_ADM_1600-Daily

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  160. @Schnexnayder
    Steve, what's the point of pretending that you don't understand a position that's obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent (whether or not you agree with that position)? The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed. You’re allowed to take into account whether he’s the lesser of two evils. And from their point of view that's what he was, even aside from the investigation of links to Russia, because he’d likely be replaced by someone more nakedly partisan. What clinches it is that dismissing him when he’s investigating Trump over Russia works against the independence of the FBI.

    This is pure partisan whining. If Hillary was the President and Comey was dismissed, all the Democrats who are whining now would not be whining and instead the Republicans would be. It’s 100% pure partisan politics and has nothing to do with the law.

    The FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President (and constitutionally it cannot be otherwise because the President is the head of the executive branch). If the President could only fire FBI Directors whenever there was no investigation of the executive branch pending then every FBI director could ensure his tenure by keeping investigations going all the time, which is pretty much the case anyway.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "It’s 100% pure partisan politics and has nothing to do with the law."

    No, it has to do with what laws that Hillary may have broken that Comey didn't bust her out on, and what laws that Trump may have broken that that Comey was trying to bust him on.

    "The FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President (and constitutionally it cannot be otherwise because the President is the head of the executive branch)."

    No, the FBI Director, like the President, serves at the pleasure of the people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. @Daniel Chieh
    Heresy. Those who speak against the God Emperor shall know the wrath of His fury.

    “Heresy. Those who speak against the God Emperor shall know the wrath of His fury.”

    If you an adherent to a particular faith, there is only one God, who is Emperor of Man (trigger warning). If you are choosing Trump over God, it is YOU who will incur God’s wrath.

    John 17:3 — And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

    Now, if you are an atheist, then it does matter if you trumpet Trump…you’re still going to hell for not taking God into your heart. Win-win for the side of “good”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    This is as my Master told it to me and now I tell it to thee.

    There are a billion names of damnation! A billion kinds of things that slither and slime and defile the land and sea and wind. Each thing is a kind of sin spawned by man's evil. And that man is very sinful there are many of these damned things and their power is great.

    As the purpose of all things in nature is to increase so it is with the damned. They would we joined them and so they seek to overcome us. In alien forms they assault us. In sleep they come to spread doubt and fear among us. They would corrupt our hearts and see us damned too. Trust them not nor suffer them to live.

    For each alien destroyed is a soul freed from eternal bondage. Each mortal alien life extinguished is a human soul raised to glory. Thus our eternal destiny is written in the blood of the alien.

    With sword and spear destroy the alien. With cannon shot and gun blast smash the alien. With laser beam and searing plasma scatter the alien to the stars. With tooth and fist and hammer blows, with axe and shell and poison-bombs, with VIRUS-CHARGE and THERMAL MINE!

    KILL THEM ALL! KILL THEM ALL! KILL THEM ALL!

    As my Master told it to me I now tell it to thee that thou shalt tell others in thy turn.

    Suffer not the Witch to live.

    — The Commandments of Holy Terra
    , @Anonymous Nephew
    King of Kings, and Troll of Trolls.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. @Jack D
    This is pure partisan whining. If Hillary was the President and Comey was dismissed, all the Democrats who are whining now would not be whining and instead the Republicans would be. It's 100% pure partisan politics and has nothing to do with the law.

    The FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President (and constitutionally it cannot be otherwise because the President is the head of the executive branch). If the President could only fire FBI Directors whenever there was no investigation of the executive branch pending then every FBI director could ensure his tenure by keeping investigations going all the time, which is pretty much the case anyway.

    “It’s 100% pure partisan politics and has nothing to do with the law.”

    No, it has to do with what laws that Hillary may have broken that Comey didn’t bust her out on, and what laws that Trump may have broken that that Comey was trying to bust him on.

    “The FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President (and constitutionally it cannot be otherwise because the President is the head of the executive branch).”

    No, the FBI Director, like the President, serves at the pleasure of the people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D

    No, the FBI Director, like the President, serves at the pleasure of the people
     
    .

    Not last time I looked. We have a real republic, with elected representatives, and not a "People's Republic" which is another name for dictatorship. In a real republic, the people express their will thru regular elections and rule of law and the laws governing the FBI say that the FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President and is appointed by him with the advice and consent of the Senate. His term is LIMITED to 10 years to prevent another Hoover but there is nothing in the law that prevents the President from replacing the guy every week if that's what he wants, same as the Cabinet. The people have no input other than thru the election process, nor can it be otherwise unless we amend the Constitution and make FBI Director an elected office.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. @Corvinus
    "Heresy. Those who speak against the God Emperor shall know the wrath of His fury."

    If you an adherent to a particular faith, there is only one God, who is Emperor of Man (trigger warning). If you are choosing Trump over God, it is YOU who will incur God's wrath.

    John 17:3 — And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

    Now, if you are an atheist, then it does matter if you trumpet Trump...you're still going to hell for not taking God into your heart. Win-win for the side of "good".

    This is as my Master told it to me and now I tell it to thee.

    There are a billion names of damnation! A billion kinds of things that slither and slime and defile the land and sea and wind. Each thing is a kind of sin spawned by man’s evil. And that man is very sinful there are many of these damned things and their power is great.

    As the purpose of all things in nature is to increase so it is with the damned. They would we joined them and so they seek to overcome us. In alien forms they assault us. In sleep they come to spread doubt and fear among us. They would corrupt our hearts and see us damned too. Trust them not nor suffer them to live.

    For each alien destroyed is a soul freed from eternal bondage. Each mortal alien life extinguished is a human soul raised to glory. Thus our eternal destiny is written in the blood of the alien.

    With sword and spear destroy the alien. With cannon shot and gun blast smash the alien. With laser beam and searing plasma scatter the alien to the stars. With tooth and fist and hammer blows, with axe and shell and poison-bombs, with VIRUS-CHARGE and THERMAL MINE!

    KILL THEM ALL! KILL THEM ALL! KILL THEM ALL!

    As my Master told it to me I now tell it to thee that thou shalt tell others in thy turn.

    Suffer not the Witch to live.

    — The Commandments of Holy Terra

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. Jeff Sessions celebrates election of Trump at a Mobile, Alabama football stadium in December 2016:

    Jeff Sessions endorses Donald Trump at a Mobile, Alabama football stadium in February 2016:

    President Trump should name Ann Coulter as interim FBI Director prior to installing Kris Kobach as the new director of the FBI.

    Whatever happens we have Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the other side no longer has Holder or Lynch.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  165. @Corvinus
    "Heresy. Those who speak against the God Emperor shall know the wrath of His fury."

    If you an adherent to a particular faith, there is only one God, who is Emperor of Man (trigger warning). If you are choosing Trump over God, it is YOU who will incur God's wrath.

    John 17:3 — And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

    Now, if you are an atheist, then it does matter if you trumpet Trump...you're still going to hell for not taking God into your heart. Win-win for the side of "good".

    King of Kings, and Troll of Trolls.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. Donald Trump won the Fried Chicken Primary with the help of Jeff Sessions. The Fried Chicken Primary — also known as Super Tuesday — made it clear that Trump would be the GOP nominee for president in 2016. The endorsement of Jeff Sessions helped Trump tremendously in Alabama and some of the other Southern states that voted in the Fried Chicken Primary.

    President Trump made a great choice when he selected Jeff Sessions to be Attorney General. President Trump says Jeff Sessions is a solid guy and he damn sure is.

    President Trump should listen to Attorney General Sessions when it comes to advice on immigration policy.

    Read More
    • Agree: Travis
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  167. @Opinionator
    The ideal height of a soldier or fighter is said to be significantly lower than that.

    I’m sure you’re right. I remember seeing some rock climbers at Yosemite. They were shorter than me but much more wiry. Different activities call for different optimum physiques. Not too many Sumo wrestlers scaling El Capitan.

    The article to which I referred tested against the activity of applying for a job. So – according to them – a guy who is six two is optimum. I’d be a little to big and the average guy would be too short. Please remember this was just an article in a pop psychology magazine.

    What is the optimum height for combat?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    What is the optimum height for combat?
     
    shorter than the officers
    , @FKA Max

    Navy Seal:
    The average size of a US Navy SEAL
    About 5’10” 175lbs. This sounds small, but surprisingly larger frames tire out after long periods in the water or high stamina exercises. As a Marine myself, it didn't surprise me to stumble on this.
     
    - https://www.military1.com/special-forces/article/404366-who-would-win-in-a-fight-32-nfl-running-backs-vs-32-navy-seals/

    Tiger Woods is six one, here in a group photo with Navy Seals:

    When you take a look at this recent blog post photo by Mr. Sailer, many of the Navy Seals seem to have high/wide cheekbones: http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2016/0420/r75852_2_1296x1029cc.jpg
     
    - http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-secret-in-your-eyes/#comment-1801503

    After his return to the front, he was wounded in the throat by a sniper’s bullet. At 6 ft 2 in (1.88 m) Orwell was considerably taller than the Spanish fighters[62] and had been warned against standing against the trench parapet.
     
    - http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-flynn-effect-for-height/#comment-1854211
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. @Corvinus
    "It’s 100% pure partisan politics and has nothing to do with the law."

    No, it has to do with what laws that Hillary may have broken that Comey didn't bust her out on, and what laws that Trump may have broken that that Comey was trying to bust him on.

    "The FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President (and constitutionally it cannot be otherwise because the President is the head of the executive branch)."

    No, the FBI Director, like the President, serves at the pleasure of the people.

    No, the FBI Director, like the President, serves at the pleasure of the people

    .

    Not last time I looked. We have a real republic, with elected representatives, and not a “People’s Republic” which is another name for dictatorship. In a real republic, the people express their will thru regular elections and rule of law and the laws governing the FBI say that the FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President and is appointed by him with the advice and consent of the Senate. His term is LIMITED to 10 years to prevent another Hoover but there is nothing in the law that prevents the President from replacing the guy every week if that’s what he wants, same as the Cabinet. The people have no input other than thru the election process, nor can it be otherwise unless we amend the Constitution and make FBI Director an elected office.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "We have a real republic, with elected representatives, and not a “People’s Republic” which is another name for dictatorship."

    The people, as in citizens, as in eligible and legal voters. That was the proper context. There was no direct or implied reference on my part to "People's Republic".

    "In a real republic, the people express their will thru regular elections and rule of law and the laws governing the FBI say that the FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President and is appointed by him with the advice and consent of the Senate."

    No, the FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the people by ensuring justice at the national level. While he or she is to report to the chief executive, they do not serve at their personal beck and call. They do not work behind the scenes to circumvent the legal process should the president or his cabinet be accused of malfeasance.

    "The people have no input other than thru the election process, nor can it be otherwise unless we amend the Constitution and make FBI Director an elected office."

    The people have direct input as far as how the FBI conducts its business. Recall that the FBI became an integral part of the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960's, either investigating federal violations of the 1957 Civil Rights Act or by keeping tabs on civil rights organizations deemed "subversive". Moreover, they put political pressure on that agency to conduct its affairs in a legitimate fashion. They have the recourse to inform their representatives of perceived injustices, who in turn may call for an investigation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. Trump may be trying to negotiate an end to the Syria war. The ‘Russia scandal’ is probably just an attempt to prevent Trump from doing that. Wanting to still believe in Trump I want to think the Syria bombing was more for show, and that Flynn was fired for the Yakla raid fiasco.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  170. —–…Kris Kobach as the new director of the FBI.——

    This guy Kobach is an actual reformer. Therefore he was frozen out by Trump & Co because faux reform is their game.

    Coulter & Ingraham deserve credit for bashing Trump for the past month on his myriad betrayals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  171. Trump will go Democrat for Comey’s replacement. Probably some beauty like Elliot Spitzer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  172. @syonredux

    Well, I guess one of the shortest books ever written was “The American Culture” or something…
     
    I always recommend Albion's Seed as a good place to start

    https://www.amazon.com/Albions-Seed-British-Folkways-Cultural/dp/1522668314

    Here’s shorthand version by Audacious Epigone

    Euronation
    America is a white nation.

    America is a Christian nation.

    America is an Anglophone nation.

    America is a nation built and led by white men.

    America is a heterosexual nation.

    America is a nation of male breadwinners and female homemakers.

    America is a nation of natives born on its soil.

    http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2017/04/euronation.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    By leaving out the word "majority" from most of these statements, you/he make it sound like you want to ethnically cleanse everyone else. Leaving out the qualifier also makes those statement false. Right from Day 1 and on every day since, America had blacks, Indian, Jews, gays, female breadwinners, non-English speakers, immigrants, etc. It was never some kind of pure 1950s whitopia even in the '50s . For a "white nation" Mississippi sure looks dusky and it always has.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. WGG says:

    Come is a peace maker. He sees his nation barreling toward civil war. This is how i envision his world over the last six months. He has a very loud faction of career Intel guys saying Trump is guilty. Come asks them to prove it. They provide confusing ambiguous documents and say, “there, we proved it.”

    Comey: This isn’t conclusive proof, guys. I need more
    Anti Trump Intel: We’ve been doing this a long time. If we say it’s proof, it’s proof.
    Comey: That’s not how it works. It needs to be self evident.
    ATI: If *you* use your name to say it is proof, it will become enough.
    Comey: This isn’t a lynch mob. I will give you guys more time to find real proof.
    Trump: When are we gonna wrap this up?
    Comey: When I feel the investigation is complete
    Trump: Do you have any evidence?
    Comey: No
    Trump: Then wrap it up
    ATI: We’re your loyal crew and we need more time

    Repeat many times.

    All I will say is that Trump bought OPPO on Hill from a Russian company, I don’t care. And nobody else that voted for him will care. We care about the wall. If he fucks us on this, we will let him hang.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  174. Ex-FBI Director Comey was to speak at a so-called “diversty” event in Los Angeles. “Diversity” is another way of saying less White. The anti-White nonsense in the United States is at a fever pitch.

    Diversity means less White — Diversity means less White

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  175. Golf is a dying sport. Despite that, Trump keeps investing heavily in golf resorts. Legitimate news sources have reported that sons Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr once boasted that Russian oligarchs loaned the Trump organization millions of dollars for golf resort development. They allegedly made those boasts a few years before Trump ran for office, although both now deny making those statements. Taken all together, something does appear a little screwy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    "Buy land, I hear they're not making it anymore."
    , @Daniel Chieh
    Do you think that Steve Sailers and God Emperor are in a conspiracy to promote golf?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. @syonredux
    Here's shorthand version by Audacious Epigone

    Euronation
    America is a white nation.

    America is a Christian nation.

    America is an Anglophone nation.

    America is a nation built and led by white men.

    America is a heterosexual nation.

    America is a nation of male breadwinners and female homemakers.

    America is a nation of natives born on its soil.

    http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2017/04/euronation.html
     

    By leaving out the word “majority” from most of these statements, you/he make it sound like you want to ethnically cleanse everyone else. Leaving out the qualifier also makes those statement false. Right from Day 1 and on every day since, America had blacks, Indian, Jews, gays, female breadwinners, non-English speakers, immigrants, etc. It was never some kind of pure 1950s whitopia even in the ’50s . For a “white nation” Mississippi sure looks dusky and it always has.

    Read More
    • Agree: Opinionator
    • Replies: @syonredux

    By leaving out the word “majority” from most of these statements, you/he make it sound like you want to ethnically cleanse everyone else.
     
    Only if you are paranoid.....

    Leaving out the qualifier also makes those statement false. Right from Day 1 and on every day since, America had blacks, Indian, Jews, gays, female breadwinners, non-English speakers, immigrants, etc. It was never some kind of pure 1950s whitopia even in the ’50s .
     
    Dunno. Did Blacks found Jamestown and Plymouth? How many non-English speakers attended the Continental Congress in 1776? How many Amerinds were at the Constitutional Convention? How many Gays? How many Jews?

    . For a “white nation” Mississippi sure looks dusky and it always has.

     

    Maybe Mississippi shouldn't be part of the USA? It could form the nucleus of a Black ethno-state....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. @syonredux
    From the Atlantic,

    Perhaps Anglo-America still has a chance......

    Evidence suggests financially troubled voters in the white working class were more likely to prefer Clinton over Trump. Besides partisan affiliation, it was cultural anxiety—feeling like a stranger in America, supporting the deportation of immigrants, and hesitating about educational investment—that best predicted support for Trump.
     

    This data adds to the public’s mosaic-like understanding of the 2016 election. It suggests Trump’s most powerful message, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture. Because this message seems to have resonated so deeply with voters, Trump’s policies, speeches, and eventual reelection may depend on their perception of how well he fulfills it.
     

    Researchers found that partisanship is most pronounced among the young: Among white working-class Americans under 30, 57 percent identified as Republican or Republican-leaning, compared to 29 percent who identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning. By comparison, only slightly more than half of seniors 65 and over were Republicans or Republican-leaning, compared to over one-third who were Democrats or Democratic-leaning.
     

    Controlling for other demographic variables, three factors stood out as strong independent predictors of how white working-class people would vote. The first was anxiety about cultural change. Sixty-eight percent of white working-class voters said the American way of life needs to be protected from foreign influence. And nearly half agreed with the statement, “things have changed so much that I often feel like a stranger in my own country.” Together, these variables were strong indictors of support for Trump: 79 percent of white working-class voters who had these anxieties chose Trump, while only 43 percent of white working-class voters who did not share one or both of these fears cast their vote the same way.

     


    Nearly two-thirds of the white working class say American culture has gotten worse since the 1950s. Sixty-eight percent say the U.S. is in danger of losing its identity, and 62 percent say America’s growing number of immigrants threaten the country’s culture.
     
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/white-working-class-trump-cultural-anxiety/525771/

    Yep, being unwilling to acquiesce to the Dems consolidating their power by importing a new people and preventing effective voter ID laws is really just anxiety about a little cultural change. Did the Atlantic advise people to lie down and let it pass?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. @Mark Caplan
    Golf is a dying sport. Despite that, Trump keeps investing heavily in golf resorts. Legitimate news sources have reported that sons Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr once boasted that Russian oligarchs loaned the Trump organization millions of dollars for golf resort development. They allegedly made those boasts a few years before Trump ran for office, although both now deny making those statements. Taken all together, something does appear a little screwy.

    “Buy land, I hear they’re not making it anymore.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @EriK
    Buy magic dirt, they're not making any more of it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. It has begun. Now Trump will work his way outward and downward, through the American Security Apparatus, firing everyone hired by Hussein, and anyone who looks even remotely communist, socialist, unpatriotic, or disloyal.

    (No idea if it’s true, but I hope it is. And if it turns out accurate, I’m gonna look really prescient.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @SteveRogers42
    From your lips to God's ear.
    , @anon
    yeah - i have no clear idea of Trump's real agenda. it could be any of:
    - banking mafia
    - neocon
    - GOPe
    - civic nationalist
    - Likud
    - stealth GE.

    if i had to guess it would be civic nationalist + deals with the other factions as needed.

    but regardless of any of that he's a bit of a psycho (in the good way) so he quite possibly may be planning to do this purely out of revenge for them bugging him during the election.

    Now Trump will work his way outward and downward, through the American Security Apparatus, firing everyone hired by Hussein, and anyone who looks even remotely communist, socialist, unpatriotic, or disloyal.
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55K0wJViZdo
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. Put another way, the half of the country that has hated Comey’s guts, plus the other half of the country that has hated Comey’s guts = Comey’s guts hated by roughly all the country. So obviously firing him is the worst thing ever done by a President, according to Big Media. Or it soon will be.

    This literally happened at the taping of Colbert’s show tonight.

    When Colbert led his monologue with the breaking news that Comey was fired, his liberal audience burst out into cheers and applause, much to his consternation.

    The crowd only understood it was supposed to boo when Colbert informed them that the firing came at the recommendation of AG Sessions.

    “Who loves you, and who do you love?”

    Clearly, Trump fired Comey because he wasn’t happy with his performance on the Russia investigation since the inauguration. Otherwise, why didn’t he fire him on day one? It certainly doesn’t look good. Oh, and the reason why Sailer hasn’t been “keeping up” with the Comey news is that he is a Trump fan, and isn’t that interested in talking about things when Trump looks stupid; it goes against the alt-right grain of the website.

    “One of these days, we’re gonna find some evidence. Then the American people will know that all the stories we printed about Trump were true.”

    ~the New York Times.

    That little passage ensured it was the evening’s lead-in lead material. Even Trump partisans would have to admit it’s a bald-faced lie …maybe this is a signature Trump manœuvre from his previous world. A type of rubbing it in.

    Explain what’s a lie, and how, please?

    Also Comey is nowhere near the player of the game that Hoover was, alleged cross dressing aside or no.

    How different from the days of J Edgar Poofter.

    Haven’t the Russians admitted to making this stuff up?

    Steve, what’s the point of pretending that you don’t understand a position that’s obviously perfectly straightforward and consistent (whether or not you agree with that position)? The Democrats are saying that Comey sent his letter to try to avoid getting mau-maued by Republicans after the election, which he shouldn’t have done, but that it’s not the sort of transgression (like breaking the law would be) where morally you have to urge that he be dismissed. You’re allowed to take into account whether he’s the lesser of two evils. And from their point of view that’s what he was, even aside from the investigation of links to Russia, because he’d likely be replaced by someone more nakedly partisan. What clinches it is that dismissing him when he’s investigating Trump over Russia works against the independence of the FBI.

    Can you guys please show us the Trump-Russia evidence? Can you even show probable cause? Do you have ANYTHING AT ALL? Besides Big Media propaganda with NOTHING AT ALL behind it, I mean.

    If there was ANYTHING AT ALL, why hasn’t it come to light by now?

    The family of the doctor murdered in Boston by an African immigrant have asked that donations in his memory go to open-borders outfit Medicins Sans Frontieres. I guess misery loves company.

    Wow. It’s like after a drug overdose, you suggest a remembrance by consuming more of the substance.

    We’ve seen this kind of post-mortem virtue-signaling from lefties before. The subtext seems to be “he’s dead, nothing we can do about that. Funerals are for the living, and so is this; we get some virtue points, and proof ourselves if the PC police ever come knocking.”

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary’s coronation. Stalin killing millions – crickets. But messin’ with Hill – them’s fightin’ words.

    Haha, indeed.

    Are the Clintons crooks? Yes. Throw them in jail.

    Has Trump engaged in similar shady business practices to enrich himself? Yes.

    Was Stalin a murderous butcher on an epic scale? Yes. Hang him.

    Was camp guard #28 at Auschwitz engaged in similar shady practices? Yes.

    Who are the Democrats screaming to prosecute, Trump or cankles?

    The only God Emperor is God Himself in His glory.

    I see Corvanus is still droning on about nothing.

    Sure, humiliating public firings are entertaining for third parties. They also make enemies in a way that saying “Please tender me your resignation” does not. This is why this method of firing people is far more common.

    Let’s hope his letter was intended not for Comey, but for the myriad scumbags in the National Security Apparatus who Trump intends to fire. With the message amplified by dutifully predictable Big Media.

    I suspect the notion of a public execution is more for the sake of the public and less for the sake of the doomed.

    This. The idea would be to get National Security Apparatus bureaucrats primed to turn on each other in return for keeping their jobs.

    If the President could only fire FBI Directors whenever there was no investigation of the executive branch pending then every FBI director could ensure his tenure by keeping investigations going all the time, which is pretty much the case anyway.

    This kind of thinking shows an undesirable depth, harms The Narrative. Please reconsider.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  181. @Jack Hanson
    My understanding is that Comey was at an FBI recruiting event when he got the news.

    AG Sessions is a savage. When you see a memo with the subject of RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE (in your agency), you're going to have a bad day.

    Also Comey is nowhere near the player of the game that Hoover was, alleged cross dressing aside or no.

    Hoover as a cross dresser is BS.

    The story that Hoover, a lifelong bachelor, participated in cross-dressing, all-male sex parties in New York hotel rooms, as reported by British writer Anthony Summers in a 1993 biography, has been widely debunked by historians. The story’s source, the wife of a businessman and Hoover confidante, had a grudge from a contested divorce, and other investigations of the story came up empty.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-j-edgar-hoover/2011/11/07/gIQASLlo5M_story.html?utm_term=.31777825e1a9

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. @Jack D

    And the Democratic establishment can keep the party in the hands of warmongers because they’re trained the base to hate Russia above all else.
     
    Yes, the left is famous for its hatred of Russia and all things Soviet. The US has always been at war with Putinstan. That thing with Hillary and the RESET button never happened.

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary's coronation. Stalin killing millions - crickets. But messin' with Hill - them's fightin' words.

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary’s coronation. Stalin killing millions – crickets. But messin’ with Hill – them’s fightin’ words.

    Please stop it. The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia, and Stalin wasn’t even ethnically a Russian. This is the sort of pisswater analysis one hears on the Rush Limbaugh show. The Fat One still believes that the most astonishing thing to transpire since November 8th was the transformation of US Democrats into Russia-haters. But this line of thinking takes at face value all the allegations of Russia hacking the election, even though these are completely fabricated.

    There was no Russian hacking. None whatsoever. The Democrats are so unhinged that they’re willing to bring us to the brink of war with a nuclear superpower over false allegations spun solely for domestic political consumption. This is extremely dangerous.

    And unlike (((Owen))) above, I believe they are serious about it. Not that they really believe the idiotic hacking accusations, but they really are spoiling for war with Russia. I maintain the opinion that our globalist elite would consider a nuclear exchange that leaves Russia 100% destroyed and the USA only 80% destroyed to be an acceptable scenario. This is precisely what they are trying to engineer with NATO expansion, SDI, Super-fuzing, and troop deployments in Europe. These people are insane and need to be stopped.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D

    The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia,
     
    How could anyone imagine that there is any continuity between the Soviet Union and today's Russia? It's not like their President is a KGB agent or something.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMpmCHnRjNQ

    https://www.freevector.com/aeroflot-logo
    , @Stealth

    There was no Russian hacking. None whatsoever. The Democrats are so unhinged that they’re willing to bring us to the brink of war with a nuclear superpower over false allegations spun solely for domestic political consumption. This is extremely dangerous.
     
    At this point, they don't really remember that the allegations were false. The real origin of the Russia story has vanished from their memories. It's no longer something they pretend to believe; they truly believe it.
    , @Corvinus
    "I maintain the opinion that our globalist elite would consider a nuclear exchange that leaves Russia 100% destroyed and the USA only 80% destroyed to be an acceptable scenario."

    I would call it wild speculation rather than an opinion. I mean, who would the elite rule over if the world would become a vast wasteland?

    "These people are insane and need to be stopped."

    For the love of God, what are you going to do about it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. @Mark Caplan
    Golf is a dying sport. Despite that, Trump keeps investing heavily in golf resorts. Legitimate news sources have reported that sons Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr once boasted that Russian oligarchs loaned the Trump organization millions of dollars for golf resort development. They allegedly made those boasts a few years before Trump ran for office, although both now deny making those statements. Taken all together, something does appear a little screwy.

    Do you think that Steve Sailers and God Emperor are in a conspiracy to promote golf?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    Daniel, you’re killin’ it in these comments. :)
    , @Opinionator
    Steve's apparent lack of warmth toward Trump during the campaign and after was obviously a ruse to throw us off the scent.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    Setting up Corvy into a huge Warhammer40k rant was pretty awesome :D
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. @reiner Tor
    Newsflash: much of the alt-right has more or less abandoned Trump since his Syria strikes. It includes the majority of the commenters on the Syria strikes thread a month ago.

    I don’t think so. DACA though…

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    I think everybody was dissatisfied with DACA, but only the Syrian strikes opened the floodgates of dissatisfaction in many.

    In any event, saying that "in alt-right circles, it's impossible to criticize or disparage Trump" is quite wrong. If anything, many on the alt-right are too impatient and critical of Trump. Disparaging and criticizing him is now almost par for the course on the alt-right. (OK, a lot on the alt-right still defend him, but I think the emotional attachment has greatly weakened.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. @keuril
    Ray Dalio, head of Bridgewater, on Comey. Comey used to work there.
    https://twitter.com/RayDalio/status/862305040190590977

    Curiously, this tweet did not emerge 6 months ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @Opinionator
    The ideal height of a soldier or fighter is said to be significantly lower than that.

    For good reason, no infantryman wants to be noticeably taller than the others in his squad or platoon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. map says:
    @syonredux
    Hey, according to the Atlantic, Hoover's 50 years as director weren't so bad......

    Other U.S. presidents have often clashed with the FBI—J. Edgar Hoover was infamous among presidents and the public—yet many chief executives have favored a grin-and-bear-it approach. Bill Clinton had moments of heightened tension with Louis Freeh, the FBI director he appointed after Sessions, for example, but tensions never escalated as publicly as those between Trump and Comey.

    “The first 50 years or so of the FBI was all J. Edgar Hoover, and there was a very special relationship between him and all these presidents who were in a way quite deferential to him,” Greenberg said. “There were always conflicts and tensions. They sometimes had to rein him in and he sometimes pushed them around. So this is striking to see, post-Nixon, it really is a crisis.”
     
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/an-act-of-presidential-imperialism/526053/

    What people tend to forget is that the peak of the FBI’s power under Hoover happened when America was a very high trust society. Hoover was not powerful because he had dirt on anyone. He was powerful because the general public would never believe that a government agency would be that unscrupulous.

    Today, our society is low trust and most people believe the government tilts evil. Consequently, the FBI is now staffed with career bureaucrats and navel-gazers that are merely threatening to the hoi-polloi and that do the bidding of their masters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. @Corvinus
    Thanks for noticing, i-Steve style.

    Comey's firing was forthcoming. Trump waited until it was tenable. Regardless, his removal does not stop the investigation. There are two federal grand juries underway, one focused on a RICO case and the other focused on a FARA case. The prosecutors are getting their ducks in a row...they know if they shoot and miss, it makes even more likely Trump will get a second term.

    Are the Clintons crooks? Yes. Throw them in jail.

    Has Trump engaged in similar shady business practices to enrich himself? Yes.

    So, to me, let's find out Trump, the "God-Emperor", is pulling the wool over people's eyes by touting populist while securing his own business dealings post-president. What are y'all afraid of?

    He is not securing anything post-president. His businesses are dead as going concerns if he leaves office and if he fails to clear his enemies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. Art says:

    Clearly the Democrats and their media (Colbert Wanabes) want to string this out into the 2018 elections.

    The Republicans should get this Russian thing over – pronto. It looks like it is really all about Flynn and nothing else. There is nothing about Trump – there is no there there.

    The Republicans should leak all the facts to the media – NOW!

    McConnell and Ryan should hold “get out the facts“ hearings today!

    Choice – take their lumps now – or take them in 2018.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  190. Lot of comment in the press as to whether Trump has sacked Comey because Comey was leading an investigation into Trump and Russia, and how it looks like Trump canned him to prevent this investigation, but to what extent is (was) Comey personally leading the investigation?

    Judging by his efforts to find out why Hillary’s State Department email account was unused and why she wrote 30,000 private emails that were deleted, he is not much of an investigator anyway.

    If someone is needed to investigate whether Trump and his campaign had any improper ties to the Russian government, I will soon have a few weeks free and would be happy to assist.

    However I will need full expenses to travel to Russia and examine hotel sheets and mattresses for urine stains, interview high-class call girls, and travel to the major cities of Russia, the Ukraine, and the Crimea to collect evidence, take photographs, etc.

    I would also be interviewing Russian oligarchs, tycoons, bankers, and Edward Snowden, and would need a collection of Faberge eggs, Stradivarius violins, Old Master and Impressionist paintings, and such like to offer them incentives to talk. (I doubt whether plying them with the usual Washington call girls and female (or male) FBI agents honey traps would be enough to do the trick.)

    I will also look into allegations that the President is married to an Eastern bloc defector and get to the bottom of how he met her, or should that be how she met him.

    I expect to be able to report back by the end of the summer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  191. @Jack Hanson
    The two best tweets on this have been Coulter's: "Trump should check with a federal judge in Hawaii to make sure he can fire Comey" and Grant Bosse saying "Trump's greatest strength is causing his critics to lose their ever loving minds."

    I'd also like to hear from the eeyore blackpill crowd how this is the machination of Jared and Ivanka, since a significant amount of you believe they're somehow running the administration, all evidence to the contrary.

    My take on this situation is that it is an instance where the institutionally correct thing and the politically correct thing happen to coincide. The Breitbart article may be correct in implying that Sessions/Trump were delaying Comey’s firing, waiting for an opportune moment vis-a-vis “RussiaGate”.

    During the election, I grudgingly accepted Scott Adams’ interpretation of Comey’s actions, which is that he was actually trying to do the right thing by letting the voters decide the election rather than institutions of the government. This was a no-win situation for Comey, and he’s never really recouped from it. Instead, he’s compounded the situation by making it appear, since Trump took office, that the FBI is some sort of government watchdog authority with the mission of conducting internal affairs matters and reporting back to the American people. Commenter WGG below may be correct that Comey is a peacemaker, but this doesn’t change the fact that he is in the news too often seeming to pass judgement on the Whitehouse. Sessions needs the FBI to be 100% on board with the administration and re-focus on actual law enforcement, but Comey is a bungler who has gotten the FBI off track. This is the institutional situation.

    The political situation is that Comey has been giving respectability to partisan innuendo and conspiracy theorizing. The fact of the dismissal means that Comey has complete zilch regarding RussiaGate (or has a smoking gun that will end Trump… in the latter case, Trump acted to buy time and do damage control, but I seriously doubt it).

    The dismissal reflects a happy coincidence in which Trump can help clean up the DOJ while forcing the Democrats to take on the role of RussiaGate investigators by demanding an independent counsel and having hearings. This is politically expedient for Trump because there is no there there, which means the Democrats, if getting what they call for, will be hoist by their own petard. They can only be saved by the GOPe stopping an independent counsel, which will allow them to keep making references to RussiaGate into the future in the absence of investigative closure.

    However, I’m interested to see who Trump appoints now. Hopefully, it will be someone Sessions recommends.

    BTW, if we get to 2020 with no wall and no changes in immigration, I am looking forward to your “bang-up job, Trumpy, bang-up job!” comments.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Independent counsel are dangerous. Congress got rid of the independent counsel law after Clinton and not just because the victim was a Democrat.

    If you are a regular prosecutor you have lots of cases to prosecute, so if you decide not to prosecute someone (or anyone) after an investigation, it's no big deal.

    BUT an independent prosecutor is given a big budget and staff and a mission. So for him to say, I just wasted $X million and 2 years and I found no evidence that anyone broke any laws is a humiliation and a failure for the special prosecutor. He's gotta indict SOMEONE. If nothing else, he indicts a few people for lying to the FBI if they get some detail of their testimony wrong when the FBI interviews them. Even if there was no underlying crime, once they have "lied" to the FBI, there's a crime right there. You also have obstruction of justice, perjury, etc., etc. so there's a lot of arrows in your quiver. Just because (hypothetically) no Trump official (let alone Trump) ever spoke to any Russian doesn't mean you can't squeeze some guilty pleas. You indict someone for 20 different felonies so they are looking at 40 years with no parole and their lawyer convinces them to plead guilty to 1 count and do 2 years at a Federal country club as the less risky option. If you draw a black (liberal Democrat) judge, you are dead meat .
    , @Jack Hanson
    And what are you gonna do after being wrong at every turn since August 2015? Stop posting cause you're so shamefully cucked into non stop defeatism?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. @Intelligent Dasein

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary’s coronation. Stalin killing millions – crickets. But messin’ with Hill – them’s fightin’ words.
     
    Please stop it. The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia, and Stalin wasn't even ethnically a Russian. This is the sort of pisswater analysis one hears on the Rush Limbaugh show. The Fat One still believes that the most astonishing thing to transpire since November 8th was the transformation of US Democrats into Russia-haters. But this line of thinking takes at face value all the allegations of Russia hacking the election, even though these are completely fabricated.

    There was no Russian hacking. None whatsoever. The Democrats are so unhinged that they're willing to bring us to the brink of war with a nuclear superpower over false allegations spun solely for domestic political consumption. This is extremely dangerous.

    And unlike (((Owen))) above, I believe they are serious about it. Not that they really believe the idiotic hacking accusations, but they really are spoiling for war with Russia. I maintain the opinion that our globalist elite would consider a nuclear exchange that leaves Russia 100% destroyed and the USA only 80% destroyed to be an acceptable scenario. This is precisely what they are trying to engineer with NATO expansion, SDI, Super-fuzing, and troop deployments in Europe. These people are insane and need to be stopped.

    The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia,

    How could anyone imagine that there is any continuity between the Soviet Union and today’s Russia? It’s not like their President is a KGB agent or something.

    https://www.freevector.com/aeroflot-logo

    Read More
    • Replies: @PiltdownMan
    The communist Internationale and the anthem of the Soviet Union were not one and the same after 1943. The tune of the post-1943 national anthem of the Soviet Union continues to be the tune of the national anthem of Russia today, but the lyrics have changed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN-ARytZKgQ
    , @inertial
    By the same token, modern Russia is also Jewish:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH0_oWf-ZKI

    ... and patriotic American:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H8si4ImrEw
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @Pat Boyle
    I'm sure you're right. I remember seeing some rock climbers at Yosemite. They were shorter than me but much more wiry. Different activities call for different optimum physiques. Not too many Sumo wrestlers scaling El Capitan.

    The article to which I referred tested against the activity of applying for a job. So - according to them - a guy who is six two is optimum. I'd be a little to big and the average guy would be too short. Please remember this was just an article in a pop psychology magazine.

    What is the optimum height for combat?

    What is the optimum height for combat?

    shorter than the officers

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. Rename FBI, the Inquisition and put Coulter in charge

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  195. @Pat Boyle
    I'm sure you're right. I remember seeing some rock climbers at Yosemite. They were shorter than me but much more wiry. Different activities call for different optimum physiques. Not too many Sumo wrestlers scaling El Capitan.

    The article to which I referred tested against the activity of applying for a job. So - according to them - a guy who is six two is optimum. I'd be a little to big and the average guy would be too short. Please remember this was just an article in a pop psychology magazine.

    What is the optimum height for combat?

    Navy Seal:
    The average size of a US Navy SEAL
    About 5’10” 175lbs. This sounds small, but surprisingly larger frames tire out after long periods in the water or high stamina exercises. As a Marine myself, it didn’t surprise me to stumble on this.

    https://www.military1.com/special-forces/article/404366-who-would-win-in-a-fight-32-nfl-running-backs-vs-32-navy-seals/

    Tiger Woods is six one, here in a group photo with Navy Seals:

    When you take a look at this recent blog post photo by Mr. Sailer, many of the Navy Seals seem to have high/wide cheekbones:

    http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-secret-in-your-eyes/#comment-1801503

    After his return to the front, he was wounded in the throat by a sniper’s bullet. At 6 ft 2 in (1.88 m) Orwell was considerably taller than the Spanish fighters[62] and had been warned against standing against the trench parapet.

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-flynn-effect-for-height/#comment-1854211

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Galton suggested that famous generals tended to be short because to become a famous general it helped not to get killed in earlier battles.
    , @Jack D
    Where are all the soul brother Navy Seals? Is the Seals racis? Is it because there's a swimming test? I thought the US military was integrated?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. @FKA Max

    Navy Seal:
    The average size of a US Navy SEAL
    About 5’10” 175lbs. This sounds small, but surprisingly larger frames tire out after long periods in the water or high stamina exercises. As a Marine myself, it didn't surprise me to stumble on this.
     
    - https://www.military1.com/special-forces/article/404366-who-would-win-in-a-fight-32-nfl-running-backs-vs-32-navy-seals/

    Tiger Woods is six one, here in a group photo with Navy Seals:

    When you take a look at this recent blog post photo by Mr. Sailer, many of the Navy Seals seem to have high/wide cheekbones: http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2016/0420/r75852_2_1296x1029cc.jpg
     
    - http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-secret-in-your-eyes/#comment-1801503

    After his return to the front, he was wounded in the throat by a sniper’s bullet. At 6 ft 2 in (1.88 m) Orwell was considerably taller than the Spanish fighters[62] and had been warned against standing against the trench parapet.
     
    - http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-flynn-effect-for-height/#comment-1854211

    Galton suggested that famous generals tended to be short because to become a famous general it helped not to get killed in earlier battles.

    Read More
    • LOL: Alden
    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    A lot of very good generals got killed in the Civil War by leading from the front.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. Comey acted flaky the whole election bouncing between supporting and opposing Trump.

    I think the obvious conclusion is Trump doesnt trust Comey and i dont blame him

    Comey tried to play both sides for his own benefit.

    Also i dont biy the bs he “threw the election” – Hillary wasnt going to win the midwest one way or the other.

    Comey did what he did for his own ends and Trump knows if he geta in Comeys way he will be stabbed in the back

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  198. @Anonymous Nephew
    What 27 year old said. It is in practice an open-the-borders organisation. They are, for example, prominent in the Calais "refugee" camps - as we know, the French don't have any doctors of their own.

    http://www.msf.org/en/article/france-calais-%E2%80%98jungle%E2%80%99-about-be-dismantled-what-will-become-unaccompanied-minors

    They also have the largest "rescue ship" picking up illegal immigrants a few miles off the Libyan coast and ferrying them to Europe.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/refugee-crisis-msf-syria-mediterranean-sea-deaths-rescue-ships-bourbon-argos-libya-operation-sophia-a7394021.html

    https://www.msf.org.uk/country/mediterranean-search-and-rescue

    Yes, to me Doctors without Borders is a terrorist organization, by their involvement in the open borders scheme and by making sure Africa through medical care keeps growing exponentially until it explodes demographically.
    Typical self-righteous bastards making the world a miserable place for everyone while believing they’re doing God’s work.
    Together with Greenpeace, they deserve to be dismantled for the good of humanity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. By the way, regarding the “Russian investigation”, I think Trump should go on national television, spread his arms, and say it loud and clear: “Knock yourself out! Investigate all you want! I’ve got nothing to hide. Think of three great revelations the Democrats have come up with so far – the “grab them…” tape; Alicia Machado; and the tax records. Every time they come up with dirt, they look ridiculous. So call their bluff.

    If anything, the investigation will likely uncover more evidence of spying on the part of the Obama administration. People have been comparing Trump to Nixon; but so far it is the Obama crowd that seems to have conducted an operation akin to Watergate. “Suspicion of foreign intervention” sounds like a convenient excuse for spying on the opposing party’s presidential candidate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  200. @FKA Max

    Navy Seal:
    The average size of a US Navy SEAL
    About 5’10” 175lbs. This sounds small, but surprisingly larger frames tire out after long periods in the water or high stamina exercises. As a Marine myself, it didn't surprise me to stumble on this.
     
    - https://www.military1.com/special-forces/article/404366-who-would-win-in-a-fight-32-nfl-running-backs-vs-32-navy-seals/

    Tiger Woods is six one, here in a group photo with Navy Seals:

    When you take a look at this recent blog post photo by Mr. Sailer, many of the Navy Seals seem to have high/wide cheekbones: http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2016/0420/r75852_2_1296x1029cc.jpg
     
    - http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-secret-in-your-eyes/#comment-1801503

    After his return to the front, he was wounded in the throat by a sniper’s bullet. At 6 ft 2 in (1.88 m) Orwell was considerably taller than the Spanish fighters[62] and had been warned against standing against the trench parapet.
     
    - http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-flynn-effect-for-height/#comment-1854211

    Where are all the soul brother Navy Seals? Is the Seals racis? Is it because there’s a swimming test? I thought the US military was integrated?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. @Svigor
    It has begun. Now Trump will work his way outward and downward, through the American Security Apparatus, firing everyone hired by Hussein, and anyone who looks even remotely communist, socialist, unpatriotic, or disloyal.

    (No idea if it's true, but I hope it is. And if it turns out accurate, I'm gonna look really prescient.)

    From your lips to God’s ear.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. @Chrisnonymous
    My take on this situation is that it is an instance where the institutionally correct thing and the politically correct thing happen to coincide. The Breitbart article may be correct in implying that Sessions/Trump were delaying Comey's firing, waiting for an opportune moment vis-a-vis "RussiaGate".

    During the election, I grudgingly accepted Scott Adams' interpretation of Comey's actions, which is that he was actually trying to do the right thing by letting the voters decide the election rather than institutions of the government. This was a no-win situation for Comey, and he's never really recouped from it. Instead, he's compounded the situation by making it appear, since Trump took office, that the FBI is some sort of government watchdog authority with the mission of conducting internal affairs matters and reporting back to the American people. Commenter WGG below may be correct that Comey is a peacemaker, but this doesn't change the fact that he is in the news too often seeming to pass judgement on the Whitehouse. Sessions needs the FBI to be 100% on board with the administration and re-focus on actual law enforcement, but Comey is a bungler who has gotten the FBI off track. This is the institutional situation.

    The political situation is that Comey has been giving respectability to partisan innuendo and conspiracy theorizing. The fact of the dismissal means that Comey has complete zilch regarding RussiaGate (or has a smoking gun that will end Trump... in the latter case, Trump acted to buy time and do damage control, but I seriously doubt it).

    The dismissal reflects a happy coincidence in which Trump can help clean up the DOJ while forcing the Democrats to take on the role of RussiaGate investigators by demanding an independent counsel and having hearings. This is politically expedient for Trump because there is no there there, which means the Democrats, if getting what they call for, will be hoist by their own petard. They can only be saved by the GOPe stopping an independent counsel, which will allow them to keep making references to RussiaGate into the future in the absence of investigative closure.

    However, I'm interested to see who Trump appoints now. Hopefully, it will be someone Sessions recommends.

    BTW, if we get to 2020 with no wall and no changes in immigration, I am looking forward to your "bang-up job, Trumpy, bang-up job!" comments.

    Independent counsel are dangerous. Congress got rid of the independent counsel law after Clinton and not just because the victim was a Democrat.

    If you are a regular prosecutor you have lots of cases to prosecute, so if you decide not to prosecute someone (or anyone) after an investigation, it’s no big deal.

    BUT an independent prosecutor is given a big budget and staff and a mission. So for him to say, I just wasted $X million and 2 years and I found no evidence that anyone broke any laws is a humiliation and a failure for the special prosecutor. He’s gotta indict SOMEONE. If nothing else, he indicts a few people for lying to the FBI if they get some detail of their testimony wrong when the FBI interviews them. Even if there was no underlying crime, once they have “lied” to the FBI, there’s a crime right there. You also have obstruction of justice, perjury, etc., etc. so there’s a lot of arrows in your quiver. Just because (hypothetically) no Trump official (let alone Trump) ever spoke to any Russian doesn’t mean you can’t squeeze some guilty pleas. You indict someone for 20 different felonies so they are looking at 40 years with no parole and their lawyer convinces them to plead guilty to 1 count and do 2 years at a Federal country club as the less risky option. If you draw a black (liberal Democrat) judge, you are dead meat .

    Read More
    • Replies: @neprof
    Good post, Scotter Libby would agree as well.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. @HBD Guy
    Hi Steve: Why no cable news? You are not a TV watcher? You sure seem familiar with the Simpsons..

    You need work on your reading comprehension skills. never claimed he wasn’t of possession of TV. He’s cable averse. Surely in the year 2017 there are other methods for a fan to watch the Simpsons besides a cable box.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. @Jack D

    The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia,
     
    How could anyone imagine that there is any continuity between the Soviet Union and today's Russia? It's not like their President is a KGB agent or something.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMpmCHnRjNQ

    https://www.freevector.com/aeroflot-logo

    The communist Internationale and the anthem of the Soviet Union were not one and the same after 1943. The tune of the post-1943 national anthem of the Soviet Union continues to be the tune of the national anthem of Russia today, but the lyrics have changed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. @Jack D
    "Buy land, I hear they're not making it anymore."

    Buy magic dirt, they’re not making any more of it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. @O'Really
    This literally happened at the taping of Colbert's show tonight.

    When Colbert led his monologue with the breaking news that Comey was fired, his liberal audience burst out into cheers and applause, much to his consternation.

    The crowd only understood it was supposed to boo when Colbert informed them that the firing came at the recommendation of AG Sessions.

    http://freebeacon.com/culture/colbert-audience-cheers-news-james-comeys-firing/

    A lot of my career in government and private industry was based on firing incompetents. I went to graduate school to learn to be a Program Evaluator. That was a governmental position for someone who studies programs and writes reports to eliminate the ones that don’t work. In my experience roughly half of all government programs when seriously examined are eliminated. That doesn’t mean that half of the programs that pass scrutiny are effective. A program has to be obviously bad before it is summarily defunded. Merely stupid and ineffective programs survive.

    I did that for a while and then moved into management positions where I often removed excess staff. I became, at least in part, a ‘hatchet man’. When I quit government where I had eliminated hundreds of jobs. I went into private industry.

    There too I found I was in demand for my ability to cut bad staff. What is ‘bad staff’?

    I was in data processing. I managed teams of programmers. I fired/laid off many programmers usually because they couldn’t program. Businesses in America carry a lot of deadwood.

    I used to think I had fired more staff than Trump – although they were no where as highly positioned as the one’s Trump got rid of. I got rid of lots of staff and I hired nearly as many.

    My net assessment? People who suffer from the incompetence of bad worker will still not thank you for getting rid of them – but upper management probably will. They call you names and they think that they themselves are too nice to do such a job. When I was an evaluator I always said that if you weren’t called a Nazi regularly – you probably were taking your salary under false circumstances.

    I never saw Trump’s “You’re fired” show. But in reality you should always try to make the firing as undramatic as possible. Bad television I suppose, but good business.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. @Daniel Chieh
    Do you think that Steve Sailers and God Emperor are in a conspiracy to promote golf?

    Daniel, you’re killin’ it in these comments. :)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. @Daniel Chieh
    Do you think that Steve Sailers and God Emperor are in a conspiracy to promote golf?

    Steve’s apparent lack of warmth toward Trump during the campaign and after was obviously a ruse to throw us off the scent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. @Jack D
    Independent counsel are dangerous. Congress got rid of the independent counsel law after Clinton and not just because the victim was a Democrat.

    If you are a regular prosecutor you have lots of cases to prosecute, so if you decide not to prosecute someone (or anyone) after an investigation, it's no big deal.

    BUT an independent prosecutor is given a big budget and staff and a mission. So for him to say, I just wasted $X million and 2 years and I found no evidence that anyone broke any laws is a humiliation and a failure for the special prosecutor. He's gotta indict SOMEONE. If nothing else, he indicts a few people for lying to the FBI if they get some detail of their testimony wrong when the FBI interviews them. Even if there was no underlying crime, once they have "lied" to the FBI, there's a crime right there. You also have obstruction of justice, perjury, etc., etc. so there's a lot of arrows in your quiver. Just because (hypothetically) no Trump official (let alone Trump) ever spoke to any Russian doesn't mean you can't squeeze some guilty pleas. You indict someone for 20 different felonies so they are looking at 40 years with no parole and their lawyer convinces them to plead guilty to 1 count and do 2 years at a Federal country club as the less risky option. If you draw a black (liberal Democrat) judge, you are dead meat .

    Good post, Scotter Libby would agree as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. @Chrisnonymous
    My take on this situation is that it is an instance where the institutionally correct thing and the politically correct thing happen to coincide. The Breitbart article may be correct in implying that Sessions/Trump were delaying Comey's firing, waiting for an opportune moment vis-a-vis "RussiaGate".

    During the election, I grudgingly accepted Scott Adams' interpretation of Comey's actions, which is that he was actually trying to do the right thing by letting the voters decide the election rather than institutions of the government. This was a no-win situation for Comey, and he's never really recouped from it. Instead, he's compounded the situation by making it appear, since Trump took office, that the FBI is some sort of government watchdog authority with the mission of conducting internal affairs matters and reporting back to the American people. Commenter WGG below may be correct that Comey is a peacemaker, but this doesn't change the fact that he is in the news too often seeming to pass judgement on the Whitehouse. Sessions needs the FBI to be 100% on board with the administration and re-focus on actual law enforcement, but Comey is a bungler who has gotten the FBI off track. This is the institutional situation.

    The political situation is that Comey has been giving respectability to partisan innuendo and conspiracy theorizing. The fact of the dismissal means that Comey has complete zilch regarding RussiaGate (or has a smoking gun that will end Trump... in the latter case, Trump acted to buy time and do damage control, but I seriously doubt it).

    The dismissal reflects a happy coincidence in which Trump can help clean up the DOJ while forcing the Democrats to take on the role of RussiaGate investigators by demanding an independent counsel and having hearings. This is politically expedient for Trump because there is no there there, which means the Democrats, if getting what they call for, will be hoist by their own petard. They can only be saved by the GOPe stopping an independent counsel, which will allow them to keep making references to RussiaGate into the future in the absence of investigative closure.

    However, I'm interested to see who Trump appoints now. Hopefully, it will be someone Sessions recommends.

    BTW, if we get to 2020 with no wall and no changes in immigration, I am looking forward to your "bang-up job, Trumpy, bang-up job!" comments.

    And what are you gonna do after being wrong at every turn since August 2015? Stop posting cause you’re so shamefully cucked into non stop defeatism?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lagertha
    shit, guys, I love you both, figure it out....But, don't like no Injuns.
    , @Chrisnonymous
    Wrong "at every turn"? I'd like to see you post a list of my predictions since August 2015 with attendant results. I don't even know what would be on the list, so if you do, my hat's off.

    My hats off also to your passionate intensity for Trump. In this day and age, there are so many who lack conviction. It may be they are better than you, but, by God, your gimp mask doesn't come out so often.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. @jimbojones
    Comey had to go after his shenanigans over the last 12 months. The only thing Trump should be blamed for is that he didn't fire Comey earlier. Though a firing this prominent requires political capital - it's not an easy thing to do.

    The Democrats, by the way, are now deeply divided. Half of them think that Trump is profoundly disloyal for firing the man who put him in the White House. And the other half think that Trump is trying to cover up the nefarious and so far invisible Russian intervention. They are, however, united in having forgotten that they all called for Comey's head last November.

    Goodbye, Comey, you freak! I wonder if we will ever know what the hell you were doing. I personally think you didn't know, either.

    hahahaaa. Americans are very stupid. Firing or not Firing Comey is the weakness. Americans think they are exceptional...but geography is not a firewall.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. @Jack Hanson
    And what are you gonna do after being wrong at every turn since August 2015? Stop posting cause you're so shamefully cucked into non stop defeatism?

    shit, guys, I love you both, figure it out….But, don’t like no Injuns.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. @Steve Sailer
    Galton suggested that famous generals tended to be short because to become a famous general it helped not to get killed in earlier battles.

    A lot of very good generals got killed in the Civil War by leading from the front.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. @Hockamaw

    Right, it’s just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It’s just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.
     
    LOL are you serious man?? It's Doctors Without Borders not some communist conspiracy. Get a grip.

    And here we have conspiracy used as a rejoinder when the facts are white obvious. Your masters aren’t getting their money’s worth.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. @Jack D
    By leaving out the word "majority" from most of these statements, you/he make it sound like you want to ethnically cleanse everyone else. Leaving out the qualifier also makes those statement false. Right from Day 1 and on every day since, America had blacks, Indian, Jews, gays, female breadwinners, non-English speakers, immigrants, etc. It was never some kind of pure 1950s whitopia even in the '50s . For a "white nation" Mississippi sure looks dusky and it always has.

    By leaving out the word “majority” from most of these statements, you/he make it sound like you want to ethnically cleanse everyone else.

    Only if you are paranoid…..

    Leaving out the qualifier also makes those statement false. Right from Day 1 and on every day since, America had blacks, Indian, Jews, gays, female breadwinners, non-English speakers, immigrants, etc. It was never some kind of pure 1950s whitopia even in the ’50s .

    Dunno. Did Blacks found Jamestown and Plymouth? How many non-English speakers attended the Continental Congress in 1776? How many Amerinds were at the Constitutional Convention? How many Gays? How many Jews?

    . For a “white nation” Mississippi sure looks dusky and it always has.

    Maybe Mississippi shouldn’t be part of the USA? It could form the nucleus of a Black ethno-state….

    Read More
    • Replies: @jim jones
    Blacks already have their won ethno-state, it is called Liberia:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRuSS0iiFyo
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. @syonredux

    By leaving out the word “majority” from most of these statements, you/he make it sound like you want to ethnically cleanse everyone else.
     
    Only if you are paranoid.....

    Leaving out the qualifier also makes those statement false. Right from Day 1 and on every day since, America had blacks, Indian, Jews, gays, female breadwinners, non-English speakers, immigrants, etc. It was never some kind of pure 1950s whitopia even in the ’50s .
     
    Dunno. Did Blacks found Jamestown and Plymouth? How many non-English speakers attended the Continental Congress in 1776? How many Amerinds were at the Constitutional Convention? How many Gays? How many Jews?

    . For a “white nation” Mississippi sure looks dusky and it always has.

     

    Maybe Mississippi shouldn't be part of the USA? It could form the nucleus of a Black ethno-state....

    Blacks already have their won ethno-state, it is called Liberia:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. @Intelligent Dasein

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary’s coronation. Stalin killing millions – crickets. But messin’ with Hill – them’s fightin’ words.
     
    Please stop it. The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia, and Stalin wasn't even ethnically a Russian. This is the sort of pisswater analysis one hears on the Rush Limbaugh show. The Fat One still believes that the most astonishing thing to transpire since November 8th was the transformation of US Democrats into Russia-haters. But this line of thinking takes at face value all the allegations of Russia hacking the election, even though these are completely fabricated.

    There was no Russian hacking. None whatsoever. The Democrats are so unhinged that they're willing to bring us to the brink of war with a nuclear superpower over false allegations spun solely for domestic political consumption. This is extremely dangerous.

    And unlike (((Owen))) above, I believe they are serious about it. Not that they really believe the idiotic hacking accusations, but they really are spoiling for war with Russia. I maintain the opinion that our globalist elite would consider a nuclear exchange that leaves Russia 100% destroyed and the USA only 80% destroyed to be an acceptable scenario. This is precisely what they are trying to engineer with NATO expansion, SDI, Super-fuzing, and troop deployments in Europe. These people are insane and need to be stopped.

    There was no Russian hacking. None whatsoever. The Democrats are so unhinged that they’re willing to bring us to the brink of war with a nuclear superpower over false allegations spun solely for domestic political consumption. This is extremely dangerous.

    At this point, they don’t really remember that the allegations were false. The real origin of the Russia story has vanished from their memories. It’s no longer something they pretend to believe; they truly believe it.

    Read More
    • Agree: Daniel Chieh, reiner Tor
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. anon • Disclaimer says:

    https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2456

    What is the first word that comes to mind when you think of Donald Trump? (Numbers are not percentages. Figures show the number of times each response was given. This table reports only words that were mentioned at least five times.)

    idiot 39
    incompetent 31
    liar 30
    leader 25
    unqualified 25
    president 22
    strong 21
    businessman 18
    ignorant 16
    egotistical 15
    asshole 13
    stupid 13
    arrogant 12
    trying 12
    bully 11
    business 11
    narcissist 11
    successful 11
    disgusting 10
    great 10
    clown 9
    dishonest 9
    racist 9
    American 8
    bigot 8
    good 8
    money 8
    smart 8
    buffoon 7
    con-man 7
    crazy 7
    different 7
    disaster 7
    rich 7
    despicable 6
    dictator 6
    aggressive 5
    blowhard 5
    decisive 5
    embarrassment 5
    evil 5
    greedy 5
    inexperienced 5
    mental 5
    negotiator 5
    patriotism 5

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  219. @Jack D

    The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia,
     
    How could anyone imagine that there is any continuity between the Soviet Union and today's Russia? It's not like their President is a KGB agent or something.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMpmCHnRjNQ

    https://www.freevector.com/aeroflot-logo

    By the same token, modern Russia is also Jewish:

    … and patriotic American:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. @Jack Hanson
    And what are you gonna do after being wrong at every turn since August 2015? Stop posting cause you're so shamefully cucked into non stop defeatism?

    Wrong “at every turn”? I’d like to see you post a list of my predictions since August 2015 with attendant results. I don’t even know what would be on the list, so if you do, my hat’s off.

    My hats off also to your passionate intensity for Trump. In this day and age, there are so many who lack conviction. It may be they are better than you, but, by God, your gimp mask doesn’t come out so often.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    The fact you linked to my stunned reaction to Trump's bombing of an airbase but fail to note the string of masochism coming from you since 2015 only highlights how I've struck a nerve pointing out your nonstop defeatism. Also: your total failure to understand the gimp mask analogy.

    Tell me again how Jared and Ivanka run the Trump Admin.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. @nebulafox
    Ooh-did you do condensed matter theory?

    J. Edgar Hoover was a horrible little man, but that was his job. You don't want nice guys as your *de facto* secret police chief, you want mean, workaholic bastards with a nagging, obsessive, detail-oriented personality. Also, I guarantee that all the bien-pensants lionizing FBI power right now would have been decrying Hoover as a crypto-Nazi two years ago, ditto the security state in general. Trump is very lucky to have such obviously stupid/hypocritical opponents-not that he won't find a way to piss that advantage away, granted, but still.

    nebulafox wrote to me:

    Ooh-did you do condensed matter theory?

    No, my Ph.D. was in elementary-particle theory. But, I did later work in semiconductor device physics, followed by work in error-correction theory for satellite systems, and various other stuff. Whatever seemed interesting that someone was willing to pay me for.

    nebulafox also wrote:

    J. Edgar Hoover was a horrible little man, but that was his job. You don’t want nice guys as your *de facto* secret police chief, you want mean, workaholic bastards with a nagging, obsessive, detail-oriented personality.

    Indeed. I do not hate the Bureau the way many on the Left do (or did until Tuesday). In fact, my great-uncle was an agent who worked in the forensics lab, quite a nice guy, in fact.

    On the other hand, on sober reflection, I’m not sure the FBI has really worked out well in terms of preserving a republicans system of government.

    Dave

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. @Anonym
    I don't think so. DACA though...

    I think everybody was dissatisfied with DACA, but only the Syrian strikes opened the floodgates of dissatisfaction in many.

    In any event, saying that “in alt-right circles, it’s impossible to criticize or disparage Trump” is quite wrong. If anything, many on the alt-right are too impatient and critical of Trump. Disparaging and criticizing him is now almost par for the course on the alt-right. (OK, a lot on the alt-right still defend him, but I think the emotional attachment has greatly weakened.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. @Jack D

    No, the FBI Director, like the President, serves at the pleasure of the people
     
    .

    Not last time I looked. We have a real republic, with elected representatives, and not a "People's Republic" which is another name for dictatorship. In a real republic, the people express their will thru regular elections and rule of law and the laws governing the FBI say that the FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President and is appointed by him with the advice and consent of the Senate. His term is LIMITED to 10 years to prevent another Hoover but there is nothing in the law that prevents the President from replacing the guy every week if that's what he wants, same as the Cabinet. The people have no input other than thru the election process, nor can it be otherwise unless we amend the Constitution and make FBI Director an elected office.

    “We have a real republic, with elected representatives, and not a “People’s Republic” which is another name for dictatorship.”

    The people, as in citizens, as in eligible and legal voters. That was the proper context. There was no direct or implied reference on my part to “People’s Republic”.

    “In a real republic, the people express their will thru regular elections and rule of law and the laws governing the FBI say that the FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the President and is appointed by him with the advice and consent of the Senate.”

    No, the FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the people by ensuring justice at the national level. While he or she is to report to the chief executive, they do not serve at their personal beck and call. They do not work behind the scenes to circumvent the legal process should the president or his cabinet be accused of malfeasance.

    “The people have no input other than thru the election process, nor can it be otherwise unless we amend the Constitution and make FBI Director an elected office.”

    The people have direct input as far as how the FBI conducts its business. Recall that the FBI became an integral part of the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960′s, either investigating federal violations of the 1957 Civil Rights Act or by keeping tabs on civil rights organizations deemed “subversive”. Moreover, they put political pressure on that agency to conduct its affairs in a legitimate fashion. They have the recourse to inform their representatives of perceived injustices, who in turn may call for an investigation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. @Hockamaw

    Right, it’s just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It’s just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.
     
    LOL are you serious man?? It's Doctors Without Borders not some communist conspiracy. Get a grip.

    A communist conspiracy would be an improvement over what they are.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  225. @Ed
    Doctors Without Borders is not an open border organization. It's just that the doctors go treat the sick regardless of political situation around the globe.

    I think the name “Without Borders” did not originally have anything to do with open borders – it meant the doctors go anywhere regardless of borders – but they have adopted that as one of their policies since that time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor
    It has begun. Now Trump will work his way outward and downward, through the American Security Apparatus, firing everyone hired by Hussein, and anyone who looks even remotely communist, socialist, unpatriotic, or disloyal.

    (No idea if it's true, but I hope it is. And if it turns out accurate, I'm gonna look really prescient.)

    yeah – i have no clear idea of Trump’s real agenda. it could be any of:
    - banking mafia
    - neocon
    - GOPe
    - civic nationalist
    - Likud
    - stealth GE.

    if i had to guess it would be civic nationalist + deals with the other factions as needed.

    but regardless of any of that he’s a bit of a psycho (in the good way) so he quite possibly may be planning to do this purely out of revenge for them bugging him during the election.

    Now Trump will work his way outward and downward, through the American Security Apparatus, firing everyone hired by Hussein, and anyone who looks even remotely communist, socialist, unpatriotic, or disloyal.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  227. @Intelligent Dasein

    Democrats never had anything against the Russians until they (supposedly) interfered with Hillary’s coronation. Stalin killing millions – crickets. But messin’ with Hill – them’s fightin’ words.
     
    Please stop it. The Soviet Union was a completely different polity from post-Soviet Russia, and Stalin wasn't even ethnically a Russian. This is the sort of pisswater analysis one hears on the Rush Limbaugh show. The Fat One still believes that the most astonishing thing to transpire since November 8th was the transformation of US Democrats into Russia-haters. But this line of thinking takes at face value all the allegations of Russia hacking the election, even though these are completely fabricated.

    There was no Russian hacking. None whatsoever. The Democrats are so unhinged that they're willing to bring us to the brink of war with a nuclear superpower over false allegations spun solely for domestic political consumption. This is extremely dangerous.

    And unlike (((Owen))) above, I believe they are serious about it. Not that they really believe the idiotic hacking accusations, but they really are spoiling for war with Russia. I maintain the opinion that our globalist elite would consider a nuclear exchange that leaves Russia 100% destroyed and the USA only 80% destroyed to be an acceptable scenario. This is precisely what they are trying to engineer with NATO expansion, SDI, Super-fuzing, and troop deployments in Europe. These people are insane and need to be stopped.

    “I maintain the opinion that our globalist elite would consider a nuclear exchange that leaves Russia 100% destroyed and the USA only 80% destroyed to be an acceptable scenario.”

    I would call it wild speculation rather than an opinion. I mean, who would the elite rule over if the world would become a vast wasteland?

    “These people are insane and need to be stopped.”

    For the love of God, what are you going to do about it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  228. Just to be clear, the standard for firing someone from top management is not “breaking the law” but something akin to “this guy’s performance is definitely below the mean/median value of the expected performance of the best person i could replace him with.”

    That’s just the point. The Democrats think that anyone they can see replacing him would be worse for the country. You disagree with them – fine. But it doesn’t make them disingenuous on this issue.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  229. Comey’s not the issue here. It’s the POTUS, who has completely morphed into a tinpot dictator. And the United States is fast turning into a banana republic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    the democrats and the media cooked up a fake story so they could legally bug the republican presidential candidate.

    watergate2

    #draintheswamp
    , @Daniel Chieh
    So, you mean, he's becoming God-Emperor for real. Thank goodness, it was overdue.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  230. @Daniel Chieh
    Do you think that Steve Sailers and God Emperor are in a conspiracy to promote golf?

    Setting up Corvy into a huge Warhammer40k rant was pretty awesome :D

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  231. Sounds like you need MindLock (TM) , the service that keeps you above water in the ever-changing currents of political ideology and debate. Once you become a MindLock subscriber, MindLock will scan all your social media postings for deviationism and warn you when you are coming too close to the line. Should a gaffe get through, our team of expert verbalists can assist you with explanations, excuses, and apologies. And should the worst happen, our national network of safe houses and career counselors will protect you from harm and help you make a fresh start.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  232. @Numinous
    Comey's not the issue here. It's the POTUS, who has completely morphed into a tinpot dictator. And the United States is fast turning into a banana republic.

    the democrats and the media cooked up a fake story so they could legally bug the republican presidential candidate.

    watergate2

    #draintheswamp

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  233. This Russia thing is getting a bit silly now. So what if the Russians did try to influence the election? The United States has been trying to interfere in the elections of other countries for decades now, most recently Mr. B. Obama threatening Brits with unfavorable trade relations if they voted for Brexit. Quite possible resentment at Mr. Obama’s presumption helped to tilt the result the other way.

    If the Russians were successful in tipping the result of the election by releasing a few emails , it just shows the weakness of the US electoral system that voters are so poorly informed and capricious.

    So what if some of Trumps team had contacts with Russians and/or members of governments of other countries? It is immaterial. If Trump is hiring people who are spies, or working against the interests of the US, then that is another matter. If Trump borrowed money from Russia for his businesses, that is immaterial too.

    On the other hand, the antics of the occupants of the White House are starting to remind me of the Keystone Cops, or even Benny Hill. Clearly Trump does not give a toss about what the press or general public, or even Congress, think about his actions or plans, so everything that has gone before about the importance of consistent messaging and so on is now irrelevant.

    It is becoming clear that Trump does not have a clue what he is doing. The health care plan that passed the House bears no resemblance at all to what Trump ran on in the election. So few details have been released about the tax plan that there can be no meaningful public discussion. He tosses off bombs and rockets like a juvenile delinquent on July 4th.

    And he refuses to release his golf scores!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  234. @Chrisnonymous
    Wrong "at every turn"? I'd like to see you post a list of my predictions since August 2015 with attendant results. I don't even know what would be on the list, so if you do, my hat's off.

    My hats off also to your passionate intensity for Trump. In this day and age, there are so many who lack conviction. It may be they are better than you, but, by God, your gimp mask doesn't come out so often.

    The fact you linked to my stunned reaction to Trump’s bombing of an airbase but fail to note the string of masochism coming from you since 2015 only highlights how I’ve struck a nerve pointing out your nonstop defeatism. Also: your total failure to understand the gimp mask analogy.

    Tell me again how Jared and Ivanka run the Trump Admin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Autochthon
    I've a sincere question, please:

    Do you genuinely believe incessantly mocking and insulting persons skeptical of Mr. Trump's administration in any way sways them to be more enthusiastic about it, or otherwise aids your cause (which, I presume, includes support for Mr. Trump's work)?

    Did you ever notice how successful litigators are careful not to imply, muvh less declare openly, any contempt for jurors? Or how disastrous it is for politicians to insult voters (by, for example, calling them "deplorable")?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  235. @Numinous
    Comey's not the issue here. It's the POTUS, who has completely morphed into a tinpot dictator. And the United States is fast turning into a banana republic.

    So, you mean, he’s becoming God-Emperor for real. Thank goodness, it was overdue.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  236. @Jack Hanson
    The fact you linked to my stunned reaction to Trump's bombing of an airbase but fail to note the string of masochism coming from you since 2015 only highlights how I've struck a nerve pointing out your nonstop defeatism. Also: your total failure to understand the gimp mask analogy.

    Tell me again how Jared and Ivanka run the Trump Admin.

    I’ve a sincere question, please:

    Do you genuinely believe incessantly mocking and insulting persons skeptical of Mr. Trump’s administration in any way sways them to be more enthusiastic about it, or otherwise aids your cause (which, I presume, includes support for Mr. Trump’s work)?

    Did you ever notice how successful litigators are careful not to imply, muvh less declare openly, any contempt for jurors? Or how disastrous it is for politicians to insult voters (by, for example, calling them “deplorable”)?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  237. @NOTA
    There are about 10% of the people expressing opinions who actually have principles, and oppose the surveillance state, the latest war, the next bailout of oligarchs, deficit spending, obstructionism in congress, etc., as a matter of principle. The other 90% hate those things when it's the other side doing them, but favor them when it's their side.

    It's worth noticing which people have principles, and which ones just have a side. The ones with principles are often worth listening to even when you disagree with them, because they're their own men and say what they believe; the others are not worth your time.

    Times like these make me proud to be a political independent. I haven’t always done a good job of sticking to my principles, but I plan on doing so more in the future and being in that 10%.

    I respect the hell out of Pat Buchanan and Ralph Nader, even though I think some of the things both men have said over the years are absolutely nutty. (I also think that both men have said absolutely brilliant things.) But I also think they say what they mean and mean what they say. I think it is no coincidence that they respected each other. Or, as a matter of fact, that Goldwater and McGovern were friends.

    As a side note, I believe the current left/right paradigm is dying, and should die. We will see common alliances between actual conservatives and actual liberals in the pre-1992 (in some ways, pre-1980s, or even pre-1960s for some of the more nauseating features of the Left) sense of the word, who wish to ally to practically get things done while throwing both the SJWs and the Norquist/neocon types overboard. That scares the hell out of the bipartisan, oligarchic elite responsible for America’s current messes, and well it should. Deep down, nationalism and social democracy are very much allies, when you think about it, just as the open borders/social justice crowd are something out of a dream of libertarians and plutocrats. And when it comes to no more stupid wars of choice in the Middle East that produce these refugee flows in the first place, that’s definitely a uniting issue, as Buchanan and Nader have both pointed out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  238. @Mr. Anon

    Just maybe, in a republic, the head of the national police should not “push around” the democratically elected head of state.

    In a republic.
     
    Just maybe, in a republic, there ought not to be a "national police". At least not one like we have.

    The FBI has been rotten from the start.

    I agree, as does Whitey Bulger.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  239. @Hockamaw

    Right, it’s just a bunch of doctors wanting to do some good In the world. It’s just a coincidence that all the doctors and all the staff of the organization and really the organization itself (see public statements RE refugee ban) are all pro open borders.
     
    LOL are you serious man?? It's Doctors Without Borders not some communist conspiracy. Get a grip.

    They themselves seem to disagree with your disagreement.

    http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/article/msf-mediterranean-two-days-three-ships-1300-rescued

    THREE ships picking up migrants.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored