The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
"The Rush to Europe: Young Africa on the Way to the Old Continent"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Bright Lights, Little Europe

Here’s a new book in French. The author Stephen Smith was born in Connecticut and is currently teaching at Duke, but has spent most of his career reporting on Africa for French outlets like Le Monde and Liberation. Here’s the Google Translate description of his book on Amazon:

The Rush to Europe: Young Africa on the way to the Old Continent

Paperback – February 7, 2018
from Stephen Smith (Auteur)

Europe is aging and depopulating. Africa is full of young people and life. A mass migration will occur. Its scale and conditions constitute one of the greatest challenges of the XXI th century.
The European Union today has 510 million aging inhabitants; Africa 1.25 billion, of which forty percent are under the age of fifteen. In 2050, 450 million Europeans will face 2.5 billion Africans. By 2100, three out of four people born in the world will be born south of the Sahara.

Africa “emerges”. Coming out of absolute poverty, she starts. At first, development uproots: it gives more people the means to leave. If Africans follow the example of other parts of the developing world, in thirty years Europe will have between 150 and 200 million Afro-Europeans, compared with 9 million today.

Migratory pressure of this magnitude will subject Europe to an unprecedented ordeal, at the risk of consuming the rift between its cosmopolitan elites and its nativist populists. The welfare state without borders is a ruinous illusion. Want to make the Mediterranean the fluke of a “Fortress Europe” by erecting around the continent of opulence and social security ramparts – fences, a wall of money, a ransom paid to the police in the front line for stemming the flow – corrupts European values.

Nationalist selfishness and humanistic angelism are dangerous. Guided by the rationality of facts, this essay on human geography assumes the need to arbitrate between interests and ideals.

So, I’m not exactly sure what Smith is saying in French, but it sounds interesting for French-readers.

Commenter For-the-Record writes:

His current book focuses on Steve’s famous chart and its implications. Among the points he makes:

1. The idea that by helping Africa to “develop” one can stem the tide of immigrants is a delusion, because aid to Africa essentially serves as a subsidy for emigration — it is not the poorest who are leaving Africa for Europe, but rather those who have achieved a certain economic level (and are in a position to pay the substantial fees involved).

2. The idea that immigration will aid the population structure of Europe, by reducing the “dependency ratio”, is likewise a delusion. Once account is taken of the fact that immigrants will have more dependents than “locals” and will require more services, the effect is actually the contrary.

3. Hence how can one justify a priori that it is better to “welcome” immigrants than to encourage residents to have more children?

Here is an interview of the author on “mainstream” French television last month: …

1. He comes across very well, not at all political, simply setting out the facts in a logical and dispassionate manner. It is difficult to imagine an interview such as this on “mainstream”US television.

2. None of his books (he has written or co-authored more than 15) has been translated into English, which is interesting since he has been teaching at Duke since 2007. Protection against thought police?

 
Hide 154 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. I dislike the French, but I don’t dislike them enough to wish this upon them.

    • Replies: @Pat Boyle
    I take it when you say you dislike the French that must have visited Paris. Me too. But the people from around Nice in the south of France are quite nice - they are not like the detestable and arrogant anal sphincters that inhabit the French capitol.
    , @istevefan
    You have to remember 1/3 of the voters went for Le Pen. I am not saying that means they are all good, but at 1/3 doesn't seem to support what is happening. To say you hate all the French ignores that there is a significant chunk of the population that is not on board with what you assume the French support.

    Based upon US government action, international and domestic, I am sure a lot of people would say they hate Americans. But there is a significant chunk of people like us on blogs like this who are vehemently opposed to current US policy.

    I have never been to France, but I would not be surprised if a detached elite, aided by a propagandist media is pushing its policies downward against a population too afraid to sacrifice their social/economic positions by resisting. I think that is true in the US and probably so in most Euro nations.
    , @Anon
    Why do you dislike them? Ever been there or met one?
  2. • Replies: @Anonym
    Youtube, Twitter and Facebook are using something called the 'Online Hate Index' created by the Anti-Defamation League.

    With a bit of tweaking this might be re-branded as "The Online Awesomeness Index"
    , @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)
    My goyische kopf is too dumb to find the video on

    https://www.adl.org/

    (there is no YouTube link to click on, either), but in this 75-second video, Brittan Heller, Director of the ADL Center for Technology & Society, announces a scientific way for bots to scan the digital world to find hate speech. "By combining Artificial Intelligence and machine learning," a preliminary version of the software "identified hate speech accurately between 78 and 85 percent of the time."

    Again my goyische kopf fails me in trying to figure out what this even means.

    [1] Why is the result reported not as a percentage (the proportion of all speech instances tested that were correctly identified as hate speech), but as a *range* of percentages?

    [2] What determines whether a speech-clip is really hate speech or not? Is the accuracy standard set by some mere human kopf, without benefit of silicon cogitation?

    -- Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    , @Jim Don Bob
    She'd look good in an SS uniform, maybe with a riding crop to complete the effect.
  3. Europe, you’re old, you’re white, you’re history.

    White lands and white wombs to be colonized by Young Africans.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    Nothing that patrolling killer AI can't solve.

    Unfortunately Europeans can't even build functioning drones.

    It think the UK managed to cobble a few together, which then crashed trying to land.
  4. if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe. The real problem would be world wide African expansion.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    As if the USA and Canada were much better.
    , @AnotherDad

    if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe.
     
    Sorry Erik, but that's crazy talk.

    I love America. This is my nation. I love the American West, and i'm probably most "at home" visiting Iowa--my ancestral heimat. But when i visit friends in the Rhineland or Bavaria, that is recognizably part of ancestral turf--i "get it". Likewise England. (I haven't been to Ireland yet--but i'll get there my retirement is young.) These places are the seat--the essential core--of the West, the womb of the white man.

    America is--sadly--already baked with "diversity". It's headed toward being Brazil. I'd like to save what can saved. But if the globo-scum would be appeased by deal where they had their globotopia here in return for Europe expelling the other and returning to being white ... i'd sign on to it. I would slug it out here in my homeland as long as it was tolerable. But knowing that white folks\the West was not going to perish, would be priceless.

    The West can't survive if the Western core is dead.
    , @Dave from Oz
    > if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe.

    The muslims will tear down every statue, every monument. Every. Single. One. Systematically. Completely. Mobs of muslim fanatics will break every stone, melt every length of bronze.

    But they will not be able to efface the books. Not for so long as one crusty old DVD with a Project Gutenberg archive survives.
  5. So, I’m not exactly sure what Smith is saying in French, but it sounds . . .

    . . . like genocide in English.

  6. Maybe the word has reached Africa that Nutella is on sale in France.

  7. If they don’t shut the door now there won’t be a Europe in 15 years

  8. @Anonymous
    https://twitter.com/Alba_Risen/status/969806367786586113

    Youtube, Twitter and Facebook are using something called the ‘Online Hate Index’ created by the Anti-Defamation League.

    With a bit of tweaking this might be re-branded as “The Online Awesomeness Index”

    • Replies: @Anonym
    The ADL's aggregator seems to have a lot of promise. Per the twitter, I might check out reddit's r/white_rights forum. Also worth trying are r/mens_rights and r/gunsarecool.

    The idea that whites might have rights or might discuss or advocate for the idea... we must unhesitatingly crush this gathering of literal Hitlers!
  9. From France to South Africa, within one lifetime.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Rather beats Cecil Rhodes old boast of 'Cape to Cairo' into a cocked hat.
    , @Anonymous

    From France to South Africa, within one lifetime.
     
    From Germany to South Africa...
    From England to South Africa...
    From America to South Africa...

    From every civilized Western Country.
    Right down the tubes.

    A dozen years ago, I moved from one of America's largest metropolises to the suburbs of a second-tier city, largely because I got tired of being the only white guy wherever I went. Now the same thing has happened here. I was in the grocery store tonight and I was the only light-complected person, as well as the only person over 5'-6" tall (I'm over 6 ft). All we have are the absolute dregs of the earth coming now. Trump was excoriated for speaking no more or less than the unvarnished truth.

    Sort of scary to think that (as many claim) these third-world countries are sending their best here. What does the future hold in store? Absolute wreckage of each and every single thing we used to hold dear. We're not even allowed to mention this. We're not even allowed to avoid it. We're not even allowed to sequester ourselves slightly away from the path of this oncoming train wreck. No, we have to partake. Our enemies--who've run this country for decades now--won't have it any other way.
  10. This is a load of crap. A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur. Europe has to take exactly as many immigrants as it wants to. All it would take to stop the wave are two sunk boats in the Mediterranean. Human rights are a thing, sure. Invading foreign countries is not a human right.

    Nor does the moronic narrative of “Europe old and fallow Africa young and potent” hold water. Europe has lost population before – after the plague in the 14th century and after the wars in the 17th century. All it takes for population to explode is one generation that wants to have children. Cultural norms change across generations.

    Europe for the Europeans. Africa for the Africans. I wouldn’t mind seeing a Wakanda. But let them build near Kilimanjaro; not in the Alps.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Not if the EU has any say.
    , @Saxon
    Yes but the current downturn is completely ENGINEERED. These useless dependents are given money and make-work wealth transfer "jobs" as political commissars of sorts so the indigenous Europeans cannot afford to have many children. A significant percentage of the native Euro men of working class are also then literally disemployed through "diversity initiative" policies and race-mixing with the male-heavy invader inflow is promoted to the women.

    No one questions the interplay between mass migration and policies designed to give these people quite literal first class citizen status to the host native population being made second class, but birth rates going down is definitely one of those effects. This is a result of wealth transfers and dispossessions of the natives, which has the effect as Peter Hitchens put it of only the very poor and very rich natives being able to afford children, while Mohammed can have 6 off their dime.

    , @The Alarmist

    This is a load of crap. A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur. Europe has to take exactly as many immigrants as it wants to.
     
    This only works if someone is willing to put up a barrier to keep all the unwelcome migrants out and forcibly defend it? Aside from the Visegrad nations, do you see anyone in Europe up to that?
    , @Moses

    A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur.
     
    No, it doesn't. The Euros have ample means to stop it any time they wish to.

    They don't wish to.

    The Italian navy is picking up Africans just off the coast of Libya and bringing them to Italy, no charge, hot soup free.

    That's all you need to know.
    , @Bardon Kaldian
    Of course it is moronic hysteria. And no one has noticed one small detail: Muslim Arabs in Maghreb (Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria,..) won't let, anytime, to be inundated by black Africans.

    And this is just a small piece that crushes this entire catastrophic narrative.
  11. @Anonym
    Youtube, Twitter and Facebook are using something called the 'Online Hate Index' created by the Anti-Defamation League.

    With a bit of tweaking this might be re-branded as "The Online Awesomeness Index"

    The ADL’s aggregator seems to have a lot of promise. Per the twitter, I might check out reddit’s r/white_rights forum. Also worth trying are r/mens_rights and r/gunsarecool.

    The idea that whites might have rights or might discuss or advocate for the idea… we must unhesitatingly crush this gathering of literal Hitlers!

  12. I was born in Africa – Egypt – and we moved to Europe in 1962. I am only 1/4 Egyptian. I went to school there till I was 12.

    The idea that the Euopeans will just give it all up is an interesting one. I suspect there will be a big backlash.

    Oil consumption per capita in Africa has been dropping for decades. Africans are in general poorer today than was the case 60 years ago – under colonialism. The fact that it is cheaper to travel by plane to Europe today does not change that fact. They are energy-poor. Black Africans are totally incapable of handling anything approximating Capitalism and all their stores are run by Indians and Chinese.

    “Ours is one continual struggle against a degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir whose occupation is hunting, and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with and, then, pass his life in indolence and nakedness.” … Mahatma Gandhi

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The point is that the 'European' leadership caste are all pro third world and anti white.
    , @Ed
    It’s pure fantasy to think Europeans will allow millions of Africans to arrive at their door without any resistance.

    Another thing the black Africans have to pass through hostile territory to reach Europe, Arab controlled lands. As we’ve seen the Arabs have no problem with exploiting black Africans and reducing them to slavery. Italy easily bribed off Libyan gangsters to keep Africans at bay, migrations to Italy from Libya have dropped and the route is shifting towards Morocco to Spain.

    Africa is simply screwed. There will be little relief from its population explosion.
  13. OT:

    Angela Merkel is back in power for next 4 years. If the Germans are stupid enough to elect that crazy woman after her Million Men March, perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation. The African migrants can safely move to Europe for another four years.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/world/europe/germany-spd-merkel.html

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    On the other hand, Merkel personally made the AfD Germany's second most popular political party.

    Some achievement in a nation where any hint of 'ethnic self interest' is pure anathema.
    , @Seamus Padraig
    Well, well. Looks like the SPD finally went and signed its own death-warrant. This should be good for the AfD, however. From the article:

    By now, the “grand coalition,” as the tie-up is known, looks anything but grand: In polls, it no longer commands a majority. And the far-right Alternative for Germany party, AfD, now the official main opposition in Parliament, has been gaining momentum.
     
    , @Saxon
    Democracy is a fake, illusory system, especially when foreigners are used to stuff the ballot bot and there is a monopoly control over the means of mass communicating information. You can't pretend that this is in any way a fair competition where everyone is given all of the facts and allowed to choose when parties like the AfD or even NPD are just called nazis by 100% of the mass media and no serious debates take place because the narrative is controlled by a monopoly over media ownership.

    I hope people will start attacking the legitimacy of mass media and spreading (the very real and true meme) that the political system is not of and by the people and does not serve their interests. That could make the sparks fly when enough people get it into their heads.
    , @Altai

    perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation.
     
    Trump didn't get the popular vote and if Sanders had run, wouldn't have won.

    The AfD have been making enormous progress that is totally inline with the rate of immigration. The political reaction is taking place as fast as it can given the cultural constraints inflicted on Germany by the US and through Hollywood. The post-war system in Germany is also of US-design and is designed to specifically frustrate these things.

    Political revolutions don't occur in that manner and never have. Indeed most of the time the revolutionaries never get power, they influence their competitors to implement their policies.

  14. @Alfred
    I was born in Africa - Egypt - and we moved to Europe in 1962. I am only 1/4 Egyptian. I went to school there till I was 12.

    The idea that the Euopeans will just give it all up is an interesting one. I suspect there will be a big backlash.

    Oil consumption per capita in Africa has been dropping for decades. Africans are in general poorer today than was the case 60 years ago - under colonialism. The fact that it is cheaper to travel by plane to Europe today does not change that fact. They are energy-poor. Black Africans are totally incapable of handling anything approximating Capitalism and all their stores are run by Indians and Chinese.

    “Ours is one continual struggle against a degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir whose occupation is hunting, and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with and, then, pass his life in indolence and nakedness.” ... Mahatma Gandhi

    The point is that the ‘European’ leadership caste are all pro third world and anti white.

  15. @rogue-one
    OT:

    Angela Merkel is back in power for next 4 years. If the Germans are stupid enough to elect that crazy woman after her Million Men March, perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation. The African migrants can safely move to Europe for another four years.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/world/europe/germany-spd-merkel.html

    On the other hand, Merkel personally made the AfD Germany’s second most popular political party.

    Some achievement in a nation where any hint of ‘ethnic self interest’ is pure anathema.

    • Replies: @rogue-one
    Fair enough.

    That said, CDU/CSU (Merkel Party) still won 34.70% and the second position went to SPD with 21.58% of seats . AfD was the third most popular party with 13.26% of seats (and 12.64 % share of votes).

    Despite witnessing a catastrophic act of national suicide, a majority of German citizens still votes for parties (CDU & SPD) that supported the suicide.

    I don't doubt that AfD will become popular. But what does it matter if it can never get more than 30% of votes? What if more than 50% of population will simply close their eyes and do what media tells them?

    Germans seem quite extremist to me. During 1930s they wanted to become the greatest evil in the world and destroyed the continent & their country. Today they want to become the greatest do-gooders in the world and will again destroy the continent and their country.

    I am not very optimistic about Germany. But I do hope my France survives, somehow.
  16. @jimbojones
    This is a load of crap. A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur. Europe has to take exactly as many immigrants as it wants to. All it would take to stop the wave are two sunk boats in the Mediterranean. Human rights are a thing, sure. Invading foreign countries is not a human right.

    Nor does the moronic narrative of "Europe old and fallow Africa young and potent" hold water. Europe has lost population before - after the plague in the 14th century and after the wars in the 17th century. All it takes for population to explode is one generation that wants to have children. Cultural norms change across generations.

    Europe for the Europeans. Africa for the Africans. I wouldn't mind seeing a Wakanda. But let them build near Kilimanjaro; not in the Alps.

    Not if the EU has any say.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The EU is run by the worst dumb fools and pompous, shallow tossers imaginable.

    Do you really, seriously want to he ruled by such half-wits as Emma Bonino, Cecilia Malmstrom, Federica Mogherini, Peter Mandelson, Franz Timmermans, Guy Verhofstadt etc ?
    , @jimbojones
    True that. The EU leaves a lot to be desired. People sometimes whine to me about the Brexit. I tell them, it's not like the EU is a resounding success.
  17. @rogue-one
    From France to South Africa, within one lifetime.

    Rather beats Cecil Rhodes old boast of ‘Cape to Cairo’ into a cocked hat.

    • Replies: @Allenbard Woodison
    You are obviously a person of unusual brilliance. Can you elaborate on your post just a bit? Not everyone knows as much history as you do.
    , @Alden
    Rhodes wanted a railroad from Cairo to Capetown.
  18. @Enochian
    I dislike the French, but I don't dislike them enough to wish this upon them.

    I take it when you say you dislike the French that must have visited Paris. Me too. But the people from around Nice in the south of France are quite nice – they are not like the detestable and arrogant anal sphincters that inhabit the French capitol.

    • Replies: @Anon
    Two hundred years ago they were Italians. Maybe that explains it?
  19. @Anonymous
    Not if the EU has any say.

    The EU is run by the worst dumb fools and pompous, shallow tossers imaginable.

    Do you really, seriously want to he ruled by such half-wits as Emma Bonino, Cecilia Malmstrom, Federica Mogherini, Peter Mandelson, Franz Timmermans, Guy Verhofstadt etc ?

  20. @Erik Sieven
    if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe. The real problem would be world wide African expansion.

    As if the USA and Canada were much better.

  21. This is the primary reason I am glad to live in the good old U S of A. Hopefully, the oceans will protect us from The Walking Dead: Africa Edition. I can stand to live in a majority Mestizo/ East Asian society. I won’t like it, but I could probably get by on a day to day basis. I mean Brazil is bad, but not *that* bad (there is even a confederate-descended white community there if I am not mistaken.) And hell, having an East Asian girlfriend seems to be something of a rite of passage on the Alt Right (looking at you, Derbyshire, Anglin, Spencer.)

    But a 90% majority Black/Muslim society? Hell. No. That is a fate worse than death. Of course, you won’t have to wait long for death to come.

    • Replies: @Samuel Skinner
    The problem is the US is in a left-wing purity spiral where people show their devotion to the cause by how much they hate white people. This generally ends with mass murder. Europe is blessed with invaders who are incapable of modern warfare and so may be better of when the tide turns.
    , @3g4me
    @21 Selvar: " I can stand to live in a majority Mestizo/ East Asian society. I won’t like it, but I could probably get by on a day to day basis. I mean Brazil is bad, but not *that* bad . . . "

    Your children and grandchildren, if you do have any, will rightfully damn you for eternity for what you are bequeathing them.
  22. Before you get all gushy about the prospects for Africa, consider that history may go in another direction altogether.

    Blacks endure in Africa because so many decisions are still made by Europeans – and Europeans are sentimental. But in the near future decisions about the future of Africa may be made by the Chinese who have a different history with African blacks and may not be circumscribed by Western values.

    In ancient times if a people could not defend themselves they were enslaved. Today if a people have no defense they are subject to the interests of other stronger states. Black Africa is at the mercy of others. Whether Africans are allowed to exist may very well be a Chinese decision. Sentimental Westerners may see it one way and cold blooded Asians another.

    • Replies: @BB753
    That's just what I fear. The Chinese deciding to let the African tide destroy Europe. "Better them than us!".
    , @rogue-one
    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe? Why would China be willing a significant cost in terms of reputation to protect Europe? And a weak, divided, poor Europe means a weaker west making Chinese hegemony easier.

    If I were a cold blooded Chinese, I wouldn't two shits about migration from Africa to Europe. I would care about access to African raw materials and African markets. I would in fact encourage migration of ambitious young men from Africa to Europe to reduce tensions and decrease risks of revolution that may jeopardize the Chinese access to Africa.
    , @Anonymous
    Well put it this way, it's perfectly obvious to anyone who is observing tragi/comedy farce of the so-called 'EU Migrant Crisis' that the powers which run the EU put a higher value on the wellbeing of the blatant invaders of Europe than they do with the interests of ethnic Europeans.

    Don't expect this to change any time soon. The Economist whipped fools are far too deeply entrenched.
  23. @Anonymous
    On the other hand, Merkel personally made the AfD Germany's second most popular political party.

    Some achievement in a nation where any hint of 'ethnic self interest' is pure anathema.

    Fair enough.

    That said, CDU/CSU (Merkel Party) still won 34.70% and the second position went to SPD with 21.58% of seats . AfD was the third most popular party with 13.26% of seats (and 12.64 % share of votes).

    Despite witnessing a catastrophic act of national suicide, a majority of German citizens still votes for parties (CDU & SPD) that supported the suicide.

    I don’t doubt that AfD will become popular. But what does it matter if it can never get more than 30% of votes? What if more than 50% of population will simply close their eyes and do what media tells them?

    Germans seem quite extremist to me. During 1930s they wanted to become the greatest evil in the world and destroyed the continent & their country. Today they want to become the greatest do-gooders in the world and will again destroy the continent and their country.

    I am not very optimistic about Germany. But I do hope my France survives, somehow.

    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    You're probably right. If Europe has any hope at all, it depends on France. Anything good to report since the election of the Rothschild boy-toy last year?
    , @Beckow

    ...Germans seem quite extremist to me...
     
    They don't just 'seem', they are extremist. Something clicked and off they went into being hyper-human. Germans like structure and dislike nuance, so propaganda works better on them than in other societies. They are also very afraid of society disapproval deep in their DNA. I suspect old German tribes were very brutal to non-conformists.

    The insane self-sacrifice 'humanism' is very widespread all over West. I had a conversation last week with a Dutch man and a Swedish woman - they yelled at me for East-Central Europe not opening up its borders to bunga-bunga migrants. (We in the Visegrad 4 countries are still European, white and Christian.) They said that the world has to be 'open', that we cannot be an 'island', that we are all 'one humanity'...predictable and very passionate. The problem was that those were sincerely held beliefs.

    There is no way to argue with them. 50% plus of Germans have voted themselves more of the same. Not that 4 more years under Merkel will be that dramatic. But not punishing a party (and politicians who led it) for the 2015 Merkel million men march establishes that there are no consequences in Europe today. That is scary.

    , @dfordoom

    I don’t doubt that AfD will become popular. But what does it matter if it can never get more than 30% of votes? What if more than 50% of population will simply close their eyes and do what media tells them?
     
    Never underestimate the ability of people to avoid noticing things they don't want to notice, or that it's socially unacceptable to notice.

    That's how we've got to the point we're at now. Most people have, very successfully, managed not to notice the disastrous consequences of immigration, feminism, homosexual activism, envirofascism, etc etc.

    They don't notice until they are personally affected. And these days they people can actually still manage not to notice when they are the ones personally affected.

    People want to conform. They want to be seen as good people who don't think bad thoughts. If that means closing your eyes while your country is destroyed it's a small price to pay.
  24. @Anonymous
    Rather beats Cecil Rhodes old boast of 'Cape to Cairo' into a cocked hat.

    You are obviously a person of unusual brilliance. Can you elaborate on your post just a bit? Not everyone knows as much history as you do.

    • Replies: @rogue-one
    Perhaps he is referring to this: Cape to Cairo Railway

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Punch_Rhodes_Colossus.png

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_to_Cairo_Railway
  25. @Pat Boyle
    Before you get all gushy about the prospects for Africa, consider that history may go in another direction altogether.

    Blacks endure in Africa because so many decisions are still made by Europeans - and Europeans are sentimental. But in the near future decisions about the future of Africa may be made by the Chinese who have a different history with African blacks and may not be circumscribed by Western values.

    In ancient times if a people could not defend themselves they were enslaved. Today if a people have no defense they are subject to the interests of other stronger states. Black Africa is at the mercy of others. Whether Africans are allowed to exist may very well be a Chinese decision. Sentimental Westerners may see it one way and cold blooded Asians another.

    That’s just what I fear. The Chinese deciding to let the African tide destroy Europe. “Better them than us!”.

    • Replies: @DisparateImpact
    Or maybe the Chinese would crush trans-Sahara smuggling in order to preserve Europe for Chinese tourists and as a steady marketplace and trading partner. Afro-chaos in Europe is not in China's interest, particularly since Europe has nukes and navies. Maybe a one-child policy, or at least access to birth control without the meddling of misguided Global Gag Rule policies, would also be in the offing.
    , @James N. Kennett

    That’s just what I fear. The Chinese deciding to let the African tide destroy Europe. “Better them than us!”.
     
    When the Chinese and Japanese look at what is happening in Europe, they must be shaking their heads in disbelief that we could be so stupid. Our self-destruction must be as incomprehensible to them as hara-kiri is to us.
  26. @Anonymous
    Not if the EU has any say.

    True that. The EU leaves a lot to be desired. People sometimes whine to me about the Brexit. I tell them, it’s not like the EU is a resounding success.

  27. @Pat Boyle
    Before you get all gushy about the prospects for Africa, consider that history may go in another direction altogether.

    Blacks endure in Africa because so many decisions are still made by Europeans - and Europeans are sentimental. But in the near future decisions about the future of Africa may be made by the Chinese who have a different history with African blacks and may not be circumscribed by Western values.

    In ancient times if a people could not defend themselves they were enslaved. Today if a people have no defense they are subject to the interests of other stronger states. Black Africa is at the mercy of others. Whether Africans are allowed to exist may very well be a Chinese decision. Sentimental Westerners may see it one way and cold blooded Asians another.

    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe? Why would China be willing a significant cost in terms of reputation to protect Europe? And a weak, divided, poor Europe means a weaker west making Chinese hegemony easier.

    If I were a cold blooded Chinese, I wouldn’t two shits about migration from Africa to Europe. I would care about access to African raw materials and African markets. I would in fact encourage migration of ambitious young men from Africa to Europe to reduce tensions and decrease risks of revolution that may jeopardize the Chinese access to Africa.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Don't worry.

    The caliber of the people who run the EU is appallingly low that they will make f*ck up after f*ck up right into the unknown indefinable future.
    All the Chinese need to do is watch from on far. A eat the popcorn.
    , @istevefan

    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe?
     
    The Chinese, along with the other NE Asians, are after all honorary whites. And we all are pretty much in the same boat with the threat from the global south. The Chinese have had a beneficial trade relationship with Europe and North America. And it makes sense for them to want to continue it. We are past the point where Europe is going to militarily threaten China's territory and vice versa. Though I can see the Chinese wanting the USA's military power to diminish, or at least BTFO of east Asia.

    If Europe descends into chaos it cannot help China. Ditto for North America. Their markets will not only be diminished, but having barbarians in potential possession of advanced weapons is not conducive to harmony. And the Chinese seem to love harmony.

    Also if Europe does indeed fall, it's a good assumption islam will be in the driver's seat. Given China's problems with its muslim population, this is probably not good. It will only embolden islam to further takeover every last bit of ground on the planet. China will have a hard time resisting this.

    China is on the path to being the largest economic nation on earth, if it isn't already there yet. Wouldn't they rather be the top dog in a nicer world, then in a giant shith*le with the barbarians increasingly at their gates?
    , @Anonymous
    Your judgment is harsh and completely accurate.
  28. @Allenbard Woodison
    You are obviously a person of unusual brilliance. Can you elaborate on your post just a bit? Not everyone knows as much history as you do.

    Perhaps he is referring to this: Cape to Cairo Railway

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_to_Cairo_Railway

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    Like the Germans' Berlin to Baghdad. That would have been an epic railroad. Blocked, as I recall, by the German colony ofTanganyika. They should have given a concession and had the Brits build the thing.
    , @Laugh Track
    Man, it's hard to find draftsmanship like that anymore. Great cartoon.
  29. Looking into this a bit (in French) Stephen Smith seems to be a pseudonym for Steve Sailer!

    In 2003 he wrote a book entitled Négrologie : pourquoi l’Afrique meurt (“Negrology: why Africa is dying”). He starts by reviewing the overall disastrous situation in Africa 40 years after independence (“Afro-optimism is an information crime”) and asks “Why?”. His answer: “In large part, because it is committing suicide”. An essential point made by the book is that the historical responsibilities of Western countries for the disastrous current state of Africa are exaggerated, and that its underdevelopment is more properly attributed to African sociological characteristics.

    His current book focuses on Steve’s famous chart and its implications. Among the points he makes:

    1. The idea that by helping Africa to “develop” one can stem the tide of immigrants is a delusion, because aid to Africa essentially serves as a subsidy for emigration — it is not the poorest who are leaving Africa for Europe, but rather those who have achieved a certain economic level (and are in a position to pay the substantial fees involved).

    2. The idea that immigration will aid the population structure of Europe, by reducing the “dependency ratio”, is likewise a delusion. Once account is taken of the fact that immigrants will have more dependents than “locals” and will require more services, the effect is actually the contrary.

    3. Hence how can one justify a priori that it is better to “welcome” immigrants than to encourage residents to have more children?

    Here is an interview of the author on “mainstream” French television last month:

    Several observations:

    1. He comes across very well, not at all political, simply setting out the facts in a logical and dispassionate manner. It is difficult to imagine an interview such as this on “mainstream”US television.

    2. None of his books (he has written or co-authored more than 15) has been translated into English, which is interesting since he has been teaching at Duke since 2007. Protection against thought police?

    • Replies: @rogue-one
    >3. Hence how can one justify a priori that it is better to “welcome” immigrants than to encourage residents to have more children?

    Because migrants, unlike children of natives, make Europe more diverse. Diversity is our strength.
    , @Obsessive Contrarian
    No, just a money decision. Academic books don't make money.

    Someone will have to do it for free as a public service. You'd think there was someone in the alt-right movement who would do that, rather than bitch & moan about how unfair life is.

    Wanna take up the task?
    , @Almost Missouri

    "Protection against thought police?"
     
    Probably the converse: policing us against prohibited thought.
  30. @Anon
    http://www.cogwriter.com/obama-conquest.jpg

    Europe, you're old, you're white, you're history.

    White lands and white wombs to be colonized by Young Africans.

    Nothing that patrolling killer AI can’t solve.

    Unfortunately Europeans can’t even build functioning drones.

    It think the UK managed to cobble a few together, which then crashed trying to land.

    • Replies: @a reader

    Unfortunately Europeans can’t even build functioning drones.
     
    Right.

    When European governments decide to wield their political powers relative to immigration, the aim is to destroy opponents to it.

    Obviously they would have no qualms using miltary power to crush the manants.

  31. Related:

    Why wouldn’t the European elites do anything?

    Exhibit 1:

    Swedish woman who made online jokes about Islam could be jailed for 2 years

    https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/03/swedish-woman-who-made-online-jokes-about-islam-could-be-jailed-for-2-years/

    • Replies: @Travis
    Europe continues to punish politically incorrect speech...while the man who slaughtered 70 and set off a bomb which killed 8 and injured dozens was sentenced to 21 years in Prison and will be released when he turns 54 years-old. Anders Behring Breivik is living in a 3 room suite , as he obtains his doctorate and recently won a judgement against the government because they limit the number of visitors and have not allowed him to date and start a family. Europe may not deserve to survive.
  32. @for-the-record
    Looking into this a bit (in French) Stephen Smith seems to be a pseudonym for Steve Sailer!

    In 2003 he wrote a book entitled Négrologie : pourquoi l'Afrique meurt ("Negrology: why Africa is dying"). He starts by reviewing the overall disastrous situation in Africa 40 years after independence ("Afro-optimism is an information crime") and asks "Why?". His answer: "In large part, because it is committing suicide". An essential point made by the book is that the historical responsibilities of Western countries for the disastrous current state of Africa are exaggerated, and that its underdevelopment is more properly attributed to African sociological characteristics.

    His current book focuses on Steve's famous chart and its implications. Among the points he makes:

    1. The idea that by helping Africa to "develop" one can stem the tide of immigrants is a delusion, because aid to Africa essentially serves as a subsidy for emigration -- it is not the poorest who are leaving Africa for Europe, but rather those who have achieved a certain economic level (and are in a position to pay the substantial fees involved).

    2. The idea that immigration will aid the population structure of Europe, by reducing the "dependency ratio", is likewise a delusion. Once account is taken of the fact that immigrants will have more dependents than "locals" and will require more services, the effect is actually the contrary.

    3. Hence how can one justify a priori that it is better to "welcome" immigrants than to encourage residents to have more children?

    Here is an interview of the author on "mainstream" French television last month:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTMl2sM8lz8

    Several observations:

    1. He comes across very well, not at all political, simply setting out the facts in a logical and dispassionate manner. It is difficult to imagine an interview such as this on "mainstream"US television.

    2. None of his books (he has written or co-authored more than 15) has been translated into English, which is interesting since he has been teaching at Duke since 2007. Protection against thought police?

    >3. Hence how can one justify a priori that it is better to “welcome” immigrants than to encourage residents to have more children?

    Because migrants, unlike children of natives, make Europe more diverse. Diversity is our strength.

  33. Apparently Stephen Smith is a US journalist writing in french, and worked on the “Africa” section of Libération, a left-wing newspaper from 1986 to 2000, and has been at “Le Monde” from 2002 onwards

    He seems rather clearheaded in the “availabe resources” category. The introduction talks about the untenable population explosion of subsaharan Africa. Back in the 50s’ the british colonial administrator for Nigeria saw it coming: he recommended to expedite the procedure for independence because the universal schooling program being rolled out simply could not be implemented due to the rapidly increasing population, and he didn’t want the Brist to be left holding the bag on this.

    There is also a long exposition on the population die-off in equatorial Africa due to imported european infections. With exploitation added to the mix, die-off may have reached up 30% maybe 50%, that’s plague level.

    Also, the author has delivered 16 other books on Africa. Quite the specialist.

    Here is another one from 2003:

    “Negrology: Why Africa is dying”

    https://www.amazon.fr/N%C3%A9grologie-Pourquoi-lAfrique-Stephen-Smith/dp/2702133347/

    40% of customers diss the work as racist dreck. So it’s on my shopping list.

    • Replies: @International Jew

    “Negrology: Why Africa is dying”
     
    Heh, that's a pun. necrology/negrology.
  34. As I said in a previous post, coherence is what constitutes identity. Coherence today is everyone showing up to work on time. Everyone shows up to work because they are in debt. They are in debt because they don’t earn enough to pay for their basic needs. Housing, transportation and health require that they take out long term loans. The formerly East-European Jewish financiers issue this debt. The financiers too are in debt. They borrowed money to buy all the (formerly independent, euro/white owned) industries at which the workers work. So the workers are paying off debt to the financiers who use that money to buy the worker’s place of employment.

    Because the workers are aging they don’t buy as much as family-formation-age consumers. They stop borrowing. The flow of interest payments to the financiers dries up. Because the financiers have moved industries overseas to arbitrage labor costs, the tax base has eroded and governments have run up huge debts . The only way to pay these debts is to inflate them away which further erodes purchasing power. Reduced consumption further pinches the financiers who have to service the debt they incurred in buying the productive apparatus of society. To service their debt, the financiers must boost consumption. The only way to do this is to bring in a new crop of consumers. Africans are prolific breeders. This means opening the borders to these potential customers. The economic planning of the experts is crude expansion, nothing more.

    Ultimately, the productive apparatus is owned by a new, different race of people and the debt slaves too are a different race of people. The money used to buy the system out from under the former owner/operators was entirely fictional, all of it borrowed and payed off with the interest stream generated by loaning the worker the money he needed to buy his own life’s necessities. The profit generated by the labor of the worker is cash in hand for the new race of owners who, having no emotional ties to the workers or their homeland, live like Royalty in walled communities which are guarded by private mercenary armies or they live abroad in the other country in which they hold dual citizenship.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    That was good till you got here:

    To service their debt, the financiers must boost consumption. The only way to do this is to bring in a new crop of consumers. Africans are prolific breeders. This means opening the borders to these potential customers.
     
    Why must the consumers be brought in? Why can't they consume where they are? And why have consumers in the first place? Why not just consume the resources directly instead of getting a small cut of the resources consumed by these otherwise superfluous people?

    No, the model you describe makes no sense from the perspective of the people it is supposed to benefit.
    , @istevefan
    And how does your theory explain Japan?
  35. @jimbojones
    This is a load of crap. A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur. Europe has to take exactly as many immigrants as it wants to. All it would take to stop the wave are two sunk boats in the Mediterranean. Human rights are a thing, sure. Invading foreign countries is not a human right.

    Nor does the moronic narrative of "Europe old and fallow Africa young and potent" hold water. Europe has lost population before - after the plague in the 14th century and after the wars in the 17th century. All it takes for population to explode is one generation that wants to have children. Cultural norms change across generations.

    Europe for the Europeans. Africa for the Africans. I wouldn't mind seeing a Wakanda. But let them build near Kilimanjaro; not in the Alps.

    Yes but the current downturn is completely ENGINEERED. These useless dependents are given money and make-work wealth transfer “jobs” as political commissars of sorts so the indigenous Europeans cannot afford to have many children. A significant percentage of the native Euro men of working class are also then literally disemployed through “diversity initiative” policies and race-mixing with the male-heavy invader inflow is promoted to the women.

    No one questions the interplay between mass migration and policies designed to give these people quite literal first class citizen status to the host native population being made second class, but birth rates going down is definitely one of those effects. This is a result of wealth transfers and dispossessions of the natives, which has the effect as Peter Hitchens put it of only the very poor and very rich natives being able to afford children, while Mohammed can have 6 off their dime.

  36. @Anonymous
    https://twitter.com/Alba_Risen/status/969806367786586113

    My goyische kopf is too dumb to find the video on

    https://www.adl.org/

    (there is no YouTube link to click on, either), but in this 75-second video, Brittan Heller, Director of the ADL Center for Technology & Society, announces a scientific way for bots to scan the digital world to find hate speech. “By combining Artificial Intelligence and machine learning,” a preliminary version of the software “identified hate speech accurately between 78 and 85 percent of the time.”

    Again my goyische kopf fails me in trying to figure out what this even means.

    [1] Why is the result reported not as a percentage (the proportion of all speech instances tested that were correctly identified as hate speech), but as a *range* of percentages?

    [2] What determines whether a speech-clip is really hate speech or not? Is the accuracy standard set by some mere human kopf, without benefit of silicon cogitation?

    – Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    • Replies: @El Dato
    Blacks identified as credit risk by machine learning algorithm --> Bad, unethical suppression of the minority individual

    Speech identified as hate speech by machine learning algorithm --> Good, successful suppression of the minority individual
  37. @rogue-one
    OT:

    Angela Merkel is back in power for next 4 years. If the Germans are stupid enough to elect that crazy woman after her Million Men March, perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation. The African migrants can safely move to Europe for another four years.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/world/europe/germany-spd-merkel.html

    Well, well. Looks like the SPD finally went and signed its own death-warrant. This should be good for the AfD, however. From the article:

    By now, the “grand coalition,” as the tie-up is known, looks anything but grand: In polls, it no longer commands a majority. And the far-right Alternative for Germany party, AfD, now the official main opposition in Parliament, has been gaining momentum.

  38. @rogue-one
    OT:

    Angela Merkel is back in power for next 4 years. If the Germans are stupid enough to elect that crazy woman after her Million Men March, perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation. The African migrants can safely move to Europe for another four years.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/world/europe/germany-spd-merkel.html

    Democracy is a fake, illusory system, especially when foreigners are used to stuff the ballot bot and there is a monopoly control over the means of mass communicating information. You can’t pretend that this is in any way a fair competition where everyone is given all of the facts and allowed to choose when parties like the AfD or even NPD are just called nazis by 100% of the mass media and no serious debates take place because the narrative is controlled by a monopoly over media ownership.

    I hope people will start attacking the legitimacy of mass media and spreading (the very real and true meme) that the political system is not of and by the people and does not serve their interests. That could make the sparks fly when enough people get it into their heads.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    Right. "Informed consent" is for medical procedures; it has no place in elections. Election results come from moral manipulation and psychological warfare, not from "stupidity" or suicidal altruism.
  39. Notre Dame, meet the Africa Addio scene where the natives are burning down a colonist’s house (from the inside) to cook a meal..

  40. @rogue-one
    Fair enough.

    That said, CDU/CSU (Merkel Party) still won 34.70% and the second position went to SPD with 21.58% of seats . AfD was the third most popular party with 13.26% of seats (and 12.64 % share of votes).

    Despite witnessing a catastrophic act of national suicide, a majority of German citizens still votes for parties (CDU & SPD) that supported the suicide.

    I don't doubt that AfD will become popular. But what does it matter if it can never get more than 30% of votes? What if more than 50% of population will simply close their eyes and do what media tells them?

    Germans seem quite extremist to me. During 1930s they wanted to become the greatest evil in the world and destroyed the continent & their country. Today they want to become the greatest do-gooders in the world and will again destroy the continent and their country.

    I am not very optimistic about Germany. But I do hope my France survives, somehow.

    You’re probably right. If Europe has any hope at all, it depends on France. Anything good to report since the election of the Rothschild boy-toy last year?

    • Replies: @rogue-one
    1. On asylum applications: He is trying to protect his right flank by making tough sounds on immigration. He is trying to introduce a law that makes deporting failed asylum seekers easier.

    That said, France cannot accept even the accepted asylum seekers. I recently visited Paris and spent some time around La Chapelle. You see thousands of recent migrants. I also talked to some who are coming from sub saharan Africa and even Sri Lanka and manage to get asylum. There was an article in Le Monde where the mayors were complaining that they cannot deal with thousands of asylum grantees every month.

    So, in conclusion, he is making some adjustments to asylum system. But in grand scheme of things, it is inconsequential. France is on its way to becoming South Africa, or at least Lebanon (with several communities that distrust each other, rather than a common unified nation). And Macron wouldn't stop it.

    2. On Europe: He is a big supporter of Angela Merkel. He would like to reform the EU to give it even more power over the member countries. I don't see how a sensible Frenchman can support his EU policies.

    3. On foreign policy & military: I actually like his foreign policy & military policy. He seems to be a true realist, is not a fan of neoconservatism, and understands that France needs hard power. That said, he did cut down defense budget. So maybe a bit of doublespeak.

    4. Popularity: He possess some charisma (or maybe the media loves him, like Obama in America). His popularity is quite high.
  41. @Pat Boyle
    I take it when you say you dislike the French that must have visited Paris. Me too. But the people from around Nice in the south of France are quite nice - they are not like the detestable and arrogant anal sphincters that inhabit the French capitol.

    Two hundred years ago they were Italians. Maybe that explains it?

  42. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Pat Boyle
    Before you get all gushy about the prospects for Africa, consider that history may go in another direction altogether.

    Blacks endure in Africa because so many decisions are still made by Europeans - and Europeans are sentimental. But in the near future decisions about the future of Africa may be made by the Chinese who have a different history with African blacks and may not be circumscribed by Western values.

    In ancient times if a people could not defend themselves they were enslaved. Today if a people have no defense they are subject to the interests of other stronger states. Black Africa is at the mercy of others. Whether Africans are allowed to exist may very well be a Chinese decision. Sentimental Westerners may see it one way and cold blooded Asians another.

    Well put it this way, it’s perfectly obvious to anyone who is observing tragi/comedy farce of the so-called ‘EU Migrant Crisis’ that the powers which run the EU put a higher value on the wellbeing of the blatant invaders of Europe than they do with the interests of ethnic Europeans.

    Don’t expect this to change any time soon. The Economist whipped fools are far too deeply entrenched.

  43. fnn says:

    Unlike the “Anglo-Saxons”, the French seem to love their intellectual debates even more than they enjoy chastising thought criminals. See the intense exchanges this year over the attempt to publish Celine’s long-suppressed anti-Semitic “pamphlets.” They actually came very close to being published. And the seemingly unthinkable was done when, in 2011, Hans-Jürgen Syberberg was awarded the highest honor of the French Ministry of Culture when he was made Commandeur de l’Ordre des Arts et des Lettres. Syberberg had made some outrageous statements that would have made the awarding of any roughly equivalent honor in the US or UK completely impossible.

  44. Ed says:

    This assumes there won’t be a backlash or any attempts to stop them which is fantasy. The laws that currently govern migration and asylum are changeable. Europe has navies etc. All Europe has to do is to increase the risk of migration or cut off the magnet. When Australia said no refugees that arrive by sea will ever settle in Australia, refugees arriving by sea plummeted. When Israel put up an armed barrier in the Sinai to prevent African migration, African migration plummeted.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Yes. But it's the EU you're talking about.

    To see where its priorities lie, look at what they are trying to do to Poland and Hungary.
    , @Whiskey
    Wrong. First, not enough young White men to guard the coast. Africans will pour in particularly in Spain and Italy. Second, no willingness on oligarchs to holkd back.

    Only prayer for Europe is Russia invading and even then they might fill it with Africans.
  45. @rogue-one
    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe? Why would China be willing a significant cost in terms of reputation to protect Europe? And a weak, divided, poor Europe means a weaker west making Chinese hegemony easier.

    If I were a cold blooded Chinese, I wouldn't two shits about migration from Africa to Europe. I would care about access to African raw materials and African markets. I would in fact encourage migration of ambitious young men from Africa to Europe to reduce tensions and decrease risks of revolution that may jeopardize the Chinese access to Africa.

    Don’t worry.

    The caliber of the people who run the EU is appallingly low that they will make f*ck up after f*ck up right into the unknown indefinable future.
    All the Chinese need to do is watch from on far. A eat the popcorn.

  46. @Ed
    This assumes there won’t be a backlash or any attempts to stop them which is fantasy. The laws that currently govern migration and asylum are changeable. Europe has navies etc. All Europe has to do is to increase the risk of migration or cut off the magnet. When Australia said no refugees that arrive by sea will ever settle in Australia, refugees arriving by sea plummeted. When Israel put up an armed barrier in the Sinai to prevent African migration, African migration plummeted.

    Yes. But it’s the EU you’re talking about.

    To see where its priorities lie, look at what they are trying to do to Poland and Hungary.

  47. @rogue-one
    Perhaps he is referring to this: Cape to Cairo Railway

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Punch_Rhodes_Colossus.png

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_to_Cairo_Railway

    Like the Germans’ Berlin to Baghdad. That would have been an epic railroad. Blocked, as I recall, by the German colony ofTanganyika. They should have given a concession and had the Brits build the thing.

  48. Ed says:
    @Alfred
    I was born in Africa - Egypt - and we moved to Europe in 1962. I am only 1/4 Egyptian. I went to school there till I was 12.

    The idea that the Euopeans will just give it all up is an interesting one. I suspect there will be a big backlash.

    Oil consumption per capita in Africa has been dropping for decades. Africans are in general poorer today than was the case 60 years ago - under colonialism. The fact that it is cheaper to travel by plane to Europe today does not change that fact. They are energy-poor. Black Africans are totally incapable of handling anything approximating Capitalism and all their stores are run by Indians and Chinese.

    “Ours is one continual struggle against a degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir whose occupation is hunting, and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with and, then, pass his life in indolence and nakedness.” ... Mahatma Gandhi

    It’s pure fantasy to think Europeans will allow millions of Africans to arrive at their door without any resistance.

    Another thing the black Africans have to pass through hostile territory to reach Europe, Arab controlled lands. As we’ve seen the Arabs have no problem with exploiting black Africans and reducing them to slavery. Italy easily bribed off Libyan gangsters to keep Africans at bay, migrations to Italy from Libya have dropped and the route is shifting towards Morocco to Spain.

    Africa is simply screwed. There will be little relief from its population explosion.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    North Africans can - and will- be relied upon to sniff the business opportunity smuggling untold thousands of 'migrants' to the fools and dupes of the EU.

    After all, all you have to is shove them a mile offshore, in an inflatable boat, and give a phone call and, Hey Presto!, the EU does all the rest!

    What's more this state of affairs *cannot and will not* ever change due to the lefty Economist judges of the ECJ.

    Has there ever been an easier way of making cash quick and fast?

    Sure beats hawking post pubescent puerile buttocks to western perves, growing 'Moroccan Black' , 'servicing' obsese cast-off old European have, or even raiding shipping Corsair style.

    What is there for the men of the Desert not to like?
    , @Alden
    I think the churches and other charities will continue to keep them fat, happy and clothed with new Oxfam outfits every day.
    , @Anonymous

    It’s pure fantasy to think Europeans will allow millions of Africans to arrive at their door without any resistance.
     
    What you call 'pure fantasy' is already happening.

    Think of the frog in the water as it approaches the boiling point. That's how it happened in America. People did nothing because it seemed to happen slowly. Then more quickly, but 'goodwhites' stand guard at every institution and media outlet to instantly and completely demolish anyone who even notices.

    It became suicide--social, political, career, what have you--to recognize the reality around you. So people retreat into their mass-media entertainment, their Facebook and Twitter, and all of these things are carefully managed for them. What's the 'pure fantasy' again?
  49. @Anonymous
    https://twitter.com/Alba_Risen/status/969806367786586113

    She’d look good in an SS uniform, maybe with a riding crop to complete the effect.

  50. In France, North African gangs have been violently attacking ethnic Chinese residents and even killed a Chinese man in 2016. The reason for the attacks — the Chinese work hard and are successful.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    I'm sure that at some point there will be Chinese cleaners paying a little visit. Connections to the mob are strong. This is going to be fun.
    , @SunBakedSuburb
    The American versions of African in Sacramento are attacking Asians at their homes and businesses as well. It's a plague.
  51. @Erik Sieven
    if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe. The real problem would be world wide African expansion.

    if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe.

    Sorry Erik, but that’s crazy talk.

    I love America. This is my nation. I love the American West, and i’m probably most “at home” visiting Iowa–my ancestral heimat. But when i visit friends in the Rhineland or Bavaria, that is recognizably part of ancestral turf–i “get it”. Likewise England. (I haven’t been to Ireland yet–but i’ll get there my retirement is young.) These places are the seat–the essential core–of the West, the womb of the white man.

    America is–sadly–already baked with “diversity”. It’s headed toward being Brazil. I’d like to save what can saved. But if the globo-scum would be appeased by deal where they had their globotopia here in return for Europe expelling the other and returning to being white … i’d sign on to it. I would slug it out here in my homeland as long as it was tolerable. But knowing that white folks\the West was not going to perish, would be priceless.

    The West can’t survive if the Western core is dead.

    • Replies: @istevefan

    Sorry Erik, but that’s crazy talk.
     
    You are correct. To agree that western civilization can survive without Europe is to sign on to the globalist belief that western civilization is universal and people are fungible.
    , @Diversity Heretic
    Glad to claim you as a fellow Iowan!! In the 1996 exhibition on the Mall celebrating Iowa's 150 years of statehood, there was a booth where a guide said that you could take an ethnic tour of Europe and never leave the borders of the state of Iowa. You're right--we in North America need to remember our brothers in Europe, although I think that we need to be as alert as possible to preserve our "Europeanness" as much as we can in North America as well.
  52. Shouldn’t the headline be, “The Scramble for Europe”?

  53. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Ed
    It’s pure fantasy to think Europeans will allow millions of Africans to arrive at their door without any resistance.

    Another thing the black Africans have to pass through hostile territory to reach Europe, Arab controlled lands. As we’ve seen the Arabs have no problem with exploiting black Africans and reducing them to slavery. Italy easily bribed off Libyan gangsters to keep Africans at bay, migrations to Italy from Libya have dropped and the route is shifting towards Morocco to Spain.

    Africa is simply screwed. There will be little relief from its population explosion.

    North Africans can – and will- be relied upon to sniff the business opportunity smuggling untold thousands of ‘migrants’ to the fools and dupes of the EU.

    After all, all you have to is shove them a mile offshore, in an inflatable boat, and give a phone call and, Hey Presto!, the EU does all the rest!

    What’s more this state of affairs *cannot and will not* ever change due to the lefty Economist judges of the ECJ.

    Has there ever been an easier way of making cash quick and fast?

    Sure beats hawking post pubescent puerile buttocks to western perves, growing ‘Moroccan Black’ , ‘servicing’ obsese cast-off old European have, or even raiding shipping Corsair style.

    What is there for the men of the Desert not to like?

    • Replies: @Alden
    The S Italian mafia is heavily involved as well.
  54. @jimbojones
    This is a load of crap. A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur. Europe has to take exactly as many immigrants as it wants to. All it would take to stop the wave are two sunk boats in the Mediterranean. Human rights are a thing, sure. Invading foreign countries is not a human right.

    Nor does the moronic narrative of "Europe old and fallow Africa young and potent" hold water. Europe has lost population before - after the plague in the 14th century and after the wars in the 17th century. All it takes for population to explode is one generation that wants to have children. Cultural norms change across generations.

    Europe for the Europeans. Africa for the Africans. I wouldn't mind seeing a Wakanda. But let them build near Kilimanjaro; not in the Alps.

    This is a load of crap. A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur. Europe has to take exactly as many immigrants as it wants to.

    This only works if someone is willing to put up a barrier to keep all the unwelcome migrants out and forcibly defend it? Aside from the Visegrad nations, do you see anyone in Europe up to that?

  55. can I assume the 9 Million Africans living in Europe are mostly from North Africa. Would be good to know how many sub-saharan Africans are living in Europe today. In Germany less than 1% of the population is listed as sub-Saharan African, with only 500,000 Blacks living in Germany today. According to multiple source France has a Black population between 2 and 4 million (about 5% of the French population is Black)

    currently 25 to 30 million muslims live in the EU, with an estimated 7,500,000 muslims living in France and another 6,500,000 muslims living in Germany today.

    when Germany and France become Islamic states in the year 2050 we should expect them to end migration from Africa…no islamic states accept refugees today and we should expect a non-christian Europe to cease all aid to Africa.

  56. @rogue-one
    Fair enough.

    That said, CDU/CSU (Merkel Party) still won 34.70% and the second position went to SPD with 21.58% of seats . AfD was the third most popular party with 13.26% of seats (and 12.64 % share of votes).

    Despite witnessing a catastrophic act of national suicide, a majority of German citizens still votes for parties (CDU & SPD) that supported the suicide.

    I don't doubt that AfD will become popular. But what does it matter if it can never get more than 30% of votes? What if more than 50% of population will simply close their eyes and do what media tells them?

    Germans seem quite extremist to me. During 1930s they wanted to become the greatest evil in the world and destroyed the continent & their country. Today they want to become the greatest do-gooders in the world and will again destroy the continent and their country.

    I am not very optimistic about Germany. But I do hope my France survives, somehow.

    …Germans seem quite extremist to me…

    They don’t just ‘seem‘, they are extremist. Something clicked and off they went into being hyper-human. Germans like structure and dislike nuance, so propaganda works better on them than in other societies. They are also very afraid of society disapproval deep in their DNA. I suspect old German tribes were very brutal to non-conformists.

    The insane self-sacrifice ‘humanism’ is very widespread all over West. I had a conversation last week with a Dutch man and a Swedish woman – they yelled at me for East-Central Europe not opening up its borders to bunga-bunga migrants. (We in the Visegrad 4 countries are still European, white and Christian.) They said that the world has to be ‘open’, that we cannot be an ‘island’, that we are all ‘one humanity’…predictable and very passionate. The problem was that those were sincerely held beliefs.

    There is no way to argue with them. 50% plus of Germans have voted themselves more of the same. Not that 4 more years under Merkel will be that dramatic. But not punishing a party (and politicians who led it) for the 2015 Merkel million men march establishes that there are no consequences in Europe today. That is scary.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Strangely enough, the ancient Germanic tribes simply killed homosexuals out of hand. This is attested by various of the ancient authors.
    The English - ultimately derived from Germanic - word 'bad' as in 'no good' is derived from a word meaning 'homosexual or hermaphrodite'.
    It is speculated that many of the so-called 'bog bodies' regularly dredged up in northern Europe were originally 'ritually killed' homosexuals.
    , @Bies Podkrakowski

    Passion
     
    I despise this word. It perfectly describes minds of contemporary progressives. Passion and feelings and not a shred of common sense.
    , @S. Anonyia
    The insanity is widespread throughout the West because people are not cynical enough. Propaganda doesn't work on cynics. Many intelligent people are quite gullible. Whether this is due to the fact that the West has been "on top" (high standard of living, lack of struggle) for decades or it's something more genetic, I'm not sure. Could also be due to media - as someone pointed out in another thread, don't underestimate the influence that messages from fiction (Harry Potter, comic books, Star Wars, etc) have had on millennials.
    , @Anonymous

    Germans like structure and dislike nuance, so propaganda works better on them than in other societies. They are also very afraid of society disapproval deep in their DNA.
     
    This comports with my experience too. Germans have corrected me here and there, exclaiming thus: "That's not how it's done!" And for a 'race' of people who pride themselves on their rationality, rationality never enters into it. It's just a matter of what's been deemed "correct".

    It's weird how many things they can do right, when you also look at what they do wrong. But I've no doubt many overseas say the same thing about Americans.
  57. @jimbojones
    This is a load of crap. A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur. Europe has to take exactly as many immigrants as it wants to. All it would take to stop the wave are two sunk boats in the Mediterranean. Human rights are a thing, sure. Invading foreign countries is not a human right.

    Nor does the moronic narrative of "Europe old and fallow Africa young and potent" hold water. Europe has lost population before - after the plague in the 14th century and after the wars in the 17th century. All it takes for population to explode is one generation that wants to have children. Cultural norms change across generations.

    Europe for the Europeans. Africa for the Africans. I wouldn't mind seeing a Wakanda. But let them build near Kilimanjaro; not in the Alps.

    A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur.

    No, it doesn’t. The Euros have ample means to stop it any time they wish to.

    They don’t wish to.

    The Italian navy is picking up Africans just off the coast of Libya and bringing them to Italy, no charge, hot soup free.

    That’s all you need to know.

    • Replies: @Amasius
    How long until we have female official government employees to give the "migrants" taxpayer-funded blowjobs right there on the boats? It's a bunch of men who refuge and migrate after all. There they are sitting presumably unblown. Do they even ask them the last time they had a blowjob? Do they care? FFS racists shaking my head.

    Within the year I'm guessing.
    , @Alden
    Even the Norwegian and minuscule Irish navies are picking them up
  58. @for-the-record
    Looking into this a bit (in French) Stephen Smith seems to be a pseudonym for Steve Sailer!

    In 2003 he wrote a book entitled Négrologie : pourquoi l'Afrique meurt ("Negrology: why Africa is dying"). He starts by reviewing the overall disastrous situation in Africa 40 years after independence ("Afro-optimism is an information crime") and asks "Why?". His answer: "In large part, because it is committing suicide". An essential point made by the book is that the historical responsibilities of Western countries for the disastrous current state of Africa are exaggerated, and that its underdevelopment is more properly attributed to African sociological characteristics.

    His current book focuses on Steve's famous chart and its implications. Among the points he makes:

    1. The idea that by helping Africa to "develop" one can stem the tide of immigrants is a delusion, because aid to Africa essentially serves as a subsidy for emigration -- it is not the poorest who are leaving Africa for Europe, but rather those who have achieved a certain economic level (and are in a position to pay the substantial fees involved).

    2. The idea that immigration will aid the population structure of Europe, by reducing the "dependency ratio", is likewise a delusion. Once account is taken of the fact that immigrants will have more dependents than "locals" and will require more services, the effect is actually the contrary.

    3. Hence how can one justify a priori that it is better to "welcome" immigrants than to encourage residents to have more children?

    Here is an interview of the author on "mainstream" French television last month:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTMl2sM8lz8

    Several observations:

    1. He comes across very well, not at all political, simply setting out the facts in a logical and dispassionate manner. It is difficult to imagine an interview such as this on "mainstream"US television.

    2. None of his books (he has written or co-authored more than 15) has been translated into English, which is interesting since he has been teaching at Duke since 2007. Protection against thought police?

    No, just a money decision. Academic books don’t make money.

    Someone will have to do it for free as a public service. You’d think there was someone in the alt-right movement who would do that, rather than bitch & moan about how unfair life is.

    Wanna take up the task?

    • Replies: @for-the-record
    No, just a money decision. Academic books don’t make money.

    That's what academic presses are for, in theory there would be a number that would be interested in his books (including Duke University Press).

    Someone will have to do it for free as a public service.

    And run afoul of copyright law? If the author wanted it out there, or at least parts of it, he is the ideal person to do the translation, he is a native English speaker (father American, mother German).
  59. @El Dato
    Nothing that patrolling killer AI can't solve.

    Unfortunately Europeans can't even build functioning drones.

    It think the UK managed to cobble a few together, which then crashed trying to land.

    Unfortunately Europeans can’t even build functioning drones.

    Right.

    When European governments decide to wield their political powers relative to immigration, the aim is to destroy opponents to it.

    Obviously they would have no qualms using miltary power to crush the manants.

  60. Many nations are going to burn to the ground in a bonfire labeled “European values.”

  61. @Selvar
    This is the primary reason I am glad to live in the good old U S of A. Hopefully, the oceans will protect us from The Walking Dead: Africa Edition. I can stand to live in a majority Mestizo/ East Asian society. I won't like it, but I could probably get by on a day to day basis. I mean Brazil is bad, but not *that* bad (there is even a confederate-descended white community there if I am not mistaken.) And hell, having an East Asian girlfriend seems to be something of a rite of passage on the Alt Right (looking at you, Derbyshire, Anglin, Spencer.)


    But a 90% majority Black/Muslim society? Hell. No. That is a fate worse than death. Of course, you won't have to wait long for death to come.

    The problem is the US is in a left-wing purity spiral where people show their devotion to the cause by how much they hate white people. This generally ends with mass murder. Europe is blessed with invaders who are incapable of modern warfare and so may be better of when the tide turns.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    It's a good question. What does the USA have in store for white people: mass slaughter or just enslavement? My guess is enslavement, with slaughter reserved for those who dare to resist.

    The mind-control masters of the mass media will have the vast majority of "fellow white people" agreeing that (as Louis C.K. said in his show) "we totally deserve it!"

  62. Zero population growth used to be the dream. Better for the environment. Better for workers. Better for women.

    Now we are supposed to fear depopulation. We’ll all be old. We’ll lack energy. This is the real problem.

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?

    • Replies: @anon
    We need worldwide Negative Population Growth (NPG); right now we have 2x (maybe 4x) the homo sapiens we can handle for a truly sustainable planetary ecosystem. In 1910 there were 1.7 billion we are now at 7.6!!! Why?
    , @Saxon
    It was a bait-and-switch. "Have fewer children! Oh and by the way we're going to bring in a nominal amount of useless people who are wholly dependent on state handouts at your expense which will make your birth rate plummet far below replacement rate once enough of them are settled here, and we're not going to give you a choice in the matter."
    , @lavoisier

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?
     
    At the point when the overpopulation was driven ONLY by People of Color. Then it became a sacred cause.
    , @dfordoom

    Zero population growth used to be the dream. Better for the environment. Better for workers. Better for women.

    Now we are supposed to fear depopulation. We’ll all be old. We’ll lack energy. This is the real problem.

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?
     
    It happened at about the time that the environmentalist movement was bought by the corporate sector.
  63. @Ed
    This assumes there won’t be a backlash or any attempts to stop them which is fantasy. The laws that currently govern migration and asylum are changeable. Europe has navies etc. All Europe has to do is to increase the risk of migration or cut off the magnet. When Australia said no refugees that arrive by sea will ever settle in Australia, refugees arriving by sea plummeted. When Israel put up an armed barrier in the Sinai to prevent African migration, African migration plummeted.

    Wrong. First, not enough young White men to guard the coast. Africans will pour in particularly in Spain and Italy. Second, no willingness on oligarchs to holkd back.

    Only prayer for Europe is Russia invading and even then they might fill it with Africans.

    • Replies: @istevefan

    Wrong. First, not enough young White men to guard the coast
     
    Come on Whiskey. It's not like you have to form a human chain to guard the coast. It is very easy to guard the coast of Europe because, A) there is no enemy navy to deal with, B) the landing craft used are slow and overloaded, and C) modern drones reduce significantly the number of people needed.

    The only thing lacking is the will to fire. If you could somehow wave a wand and tomorrow all the Europeans actually treated trespassers to their borders like the North Koreans do, the migration crisis would stop in a few days. Armed drones launching a Hellfire into a couple of overloaded boats would completely stop this so called force of nature.
  64. at the risk of consuming the rift between its cosmopolitan elites and its nativist populists.

    Not consuming, but consummating. (The French word consommer can mean both and here it’s clear that consummating is what he meant.)

  65. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Beckow

    ...Germans seem quite extremist to me...
     
    They don't just 'seem', they are extremist. Something clicked and off they went into being hyper-human. Germans like structure and dislike nuance, so propaganda works better on them than in other societies. They are also very afraid of society disapproval deep in their DNA. I suspect old German tribes were very brutal to non-conformists.

    The insane self-sacrifice 'humanism' is very widespread all over West. I had a conversation last week with a Dutch man and a Swedish woman - they yelled at me for East-Central Europe not opening up its borders to bunga-bunga migrants. (We in the Visegrad 4 countries are still European, white and Christian.) They said that the world has to be 'open', that we cannot be an 'island', that we are all 'one humanity'...predictable and very passionate. The problem was that those were sincerely held beliefs.

    There is no way to argue with them. 50% plus of Germans have voted themselves more of the same. Not that 4 more years under Merkel will be that dramatic. But not punishing a party (and politicians who led it) for the 2015 Merkel million men march establishes that there are no consequences in Europe today. That is scary.

    Strangely enough, the ancient Germanic tribes simply killed homosexuals out of hand. This is attested by various of the ancient authors.
    The English – ultimately derived from Germanic – word ‘bad’ as in ‘no good’ is derived from a word meaning ‘homosexual or hermaphrodite’.
    It is speculated that many of the so-called ‘bog bodies’ regularly dredged up in northern Europe were originally ‘ritually killed’ homosexuals.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    This is not nice.

    But does this tell us that homesexuality is a development phenomenon, not genetic?
  66. @Obsessive Contrarian
    No, just a money decision. Academic books don't make money.

    Someone will have to do it for free as a public service. You'd think there was someone in the alt-right movement who would do that, rather than bitch & moan about how unfair life is.

    Wanna take up the task?

    No, just a money decision. Academic books don’t make money.

    That’s what academic presses are for, in theory there would be a number that would be interested in his books (including Duke University Press).

    Someone will have to do it for free as a public service.

    And run afoul of copyright law? If the author wanted it out there, or at least parts of it, he is the ideal person to do the translation, he is a native English speaker (father American, mother German).

    • Replies: @Obsessive Contrarian
    The implication is that his books are being suppressed, and I think that is hogwash.

    He isn't technically an academic. I think he's a journalist and an adjunct at Duke.

    Nor did I ever suggest that anyone bootleg his work. I meant offer one's services to the author.

    BTW, I believe his books are published by a (((publishing company))) in France. Make of that what you will. Since it's the custom on this blog to point out the (((blood quantum))) of everyone referred to herein, I think pointing that out is only fair.

  67. @jimbojones
    This is a load of crap. A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur. Europe has to take exactly as many immigrants as it wants to. All it would take to stop the wave are two sunk boats in the Mediterranean. Human rights are a thing, sure. Invading foreign countries is not a human right.

    Nor does the moronic narrative of "Europe old and fallow Africa young and potent" hold water. Europe has lost population before - after the plague in the 14th century and after the wars in the 17th century. All it takes for population to explode is one generation that wants to have children. Cultural norms change across generations.

    Europe for the Europeans. Africa for the Africans. I wouldn't mind seeing a Wakanda. But let them build near Kilimanjaro; not in the Alps.

    Of course it is moronic hysteria. And no one has noticed one small detail: Muslim Arabs in Maghreb (Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria,..) won’t let, anytime, to be inundated by black Africans.

    And this is just a small piece that crushes this entire catastrophic narrative.

    • Replies: @Bies Podkrakowski
    That's no problem. Western militaries will open humanitarian corridors.
  68. @Saxon
    Democracy is a fake, illusory system, especially when foreigners are used to stuff the ballot bot and there is a monopoly control over the means of mass communicating information. You can't pretend that this is in any way a fair competition where everyone is given all of the facts and allowed to choose when parties like the AfD or even NPD are just called nazis by 100% of the mass media and no serious debates take place because the narrative is controlled by a monopoly over media ownership.

    I hope people will start attacking the legitimacy of mass media and spreading (the very real and true meme) that the political system is not of and by the people and does not serve their interests. That could make the sparks fly when enough people get it into their heads.

    Right. “Informed consent” is for medical procedures; it has no place in elections. Election results come from moral manipulation and psychological warfare, not from “stupidity” or suicidal altruism.

  69. Rather subversive of Mr. Smith (surely an anglophone given the surname, no? And surely fluent in English given his position at Duke. Why no books in English?) to use a map that’s accurate to scale, and that points out the massive development differences using the 100+ year old technology of artificial lighting. It’s almost like Africa is, shall we say, a . . . shithole.

  70. @rogue-one
    Related:

    Why wouldn't the European elites do anything?

    Exhibit 1:

    Swedish woman who made online jokes about Islam could be jailed for 2 years

    https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/03/swedish-woman-who-made-online-jokes-about-islam-could-be-jailed-for-2-years/

    Europe continues to punish politically incorrect speech…while the man who slaughtered 70 and set off a bomb which killed 8 and injured dozens was sentenced to 21 years in Prison and will be released when he turns 54 years-old. Anders Behring Breivik is living in a 3 room suite , as he obtains his doctorate and recently won a judgement against the government because they limit the number of visitors and have not allowed him to date and start a family. Europe may not deserve to survive.

    • Agree: Triumph104
  71. @ThreeCranes
    As I said in a previous post, coherence is what constitutes identity. Coherence today is everyone showing up to work on time. Everyone shows up to work because they are in debt. They are in debt because they don't earn enough to pay for their basic needs. Housing, transportation and health require that they take out long term loans. The formerly East-European Jewish financiers issue this debt. The financiers too are in debt. They borrowed money to buy all the (formerly independent, euro/white owned) industries at which the workers work. So the workers are paying off debt to the financiers who use that money to buy the worker's place of employment.

    Because the workers are aging they don't buy as much as family-formation-age consumers. They stop borrowing. The flow of interest payments to the financiers dries up. Because the financiers have moved industries overseas to arbitrage labor costs, the tax base has eroded and governments have run up huge debts . The only way to pay these debts is to inflate them away which further erodes purchasing power. Reduced consumption further pinches the financiers who have to service the debt they incurred in buying the productive apparatus of society. To service their debt, the financiers must boost consumption. The only way to do this is to bring in a new crop of consumers. Africans are prolific breeders. This means opening the borders to these potential customers. The economic planning of the experts is crude expansion, nothing more.

    Ultimately, the productive apparatus is owned by a new, different race of people and the debt slaves too are a different race of people. The money used to buy the system out from under the former owner/operators was entirely fictional, all of it borrowed and payed off with the interest stream generated by loaning the worker the money he needed to buy his own life's necessities. The profit generated by the labor of the worker is cash in hand for the new race of owners who, having no emotional ties to the workers or their homeland, live like Royalty in walled communities which are guarded by private mercenary armies or they live abroad in the other country in which they hold dual citizenship.

    That was good till you got here:

    To service their debt, the financiers must boost consumption. The only way to do this is to bring in a new crop of consumers. Africans are prolific breeders. This means opening the borders to these potential customers.

    Why must the consumers be brought in? Why can’t they consume where they are? And why have consumers in the first place? Why not just consume the resources directly instead of getting a small cut of the resources consumed by these otherwise superfluous people?

    No, the model you describe makes no sense from the perspective of the people it is supposed to benefit.

  72. @Triumph104
    In France, North African gangs have been violently attacking ethnic Chinese residents and even killed a Chinese man in 2016. The reason for the attacks -- the Chinese work hard and are successful.


    https://youtu.be/3A0VSz0msjE

    I’m sure that at some point there will be Chinese cleaners paying a little visit. Connections to the mob are strong. This is going to be fun.

  73. @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)
    My goyische kopf is too dumb to find the video on

    https://www.adl.org/

    (there is no YouTube link to click on, either), but in this 75-second video, Brittan Heller, Director of the ADL Center for Technology & Society, announces a scientific way for bots to scan the digital world to find hate speech. "By combining Artificial Intelligence and machine learning," a preliminary version of the software "identified hate speech accurately between 78 and 85 percent of the time."

    Again my goyische kopf fails me in trying to figure out what this even means.

    [1] Why is the result reported not as a percentage (the proportion of all speech instances tested that were correctly identified as hate speech), but as a *range* of percentages?

    [2] What determines whether a speech-clip is really hate speech or not? Is the accuracy standard set by some mere human kopf, without benefit of silicon cogitation?

    -- Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Blacks identified as credit risk by machine learning algorithm –> Bad, unethical suppression of the minority individual

    Speech identified as hate speech by machine learning algorithm –> Good, successful suppression of the minority individual

  74. @AnotherDad

    if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe.
     
    Sorry Erik, but that's crazy talk.

    I love America. This is my nation. I love the American West, and i'm probably most "at home" visiting Iowa--my ancestral heimat. But when i visit friends in the Rhineland or Bavaria, that is recognizably part of ancestral turf--i "get it". Likewise England. (I haven't been to Ireland yet--but i'll get there my retirement is young.) These places are the seat--the essential core--of the West, the womb of the white man.

    America is--sadly--already baked with "diversity". It's headed toward being Brazil. I'd like to save what can saved. But if the globo-scum would be appeased by deal where they had their globotopia here in return for Europe expelling the other and returning to being white ... i'd sign on to it. I would slug it out here in my homeland as long as it was tolerable. But knowing that white folks\the West was not going to perish, would be priceless.

    The West can't survive if the Western core is dead.

    Sorry Erik, but that’s crazy talk.

    You are correct. To agree that western civilization can survive without Europe is to sign on to the globalist belief that western civilization is universal and people are fungible.

  75. @Beckow

    ...Germans seem quite extremist to me...
     
    They don't just 'seem', they are extremist. Something clicked and off they went into being hyper-human. Germans like structure and dislike nuance, so propaganda works better on them than in other societies. They are also very afraid of society disapproval deep in their DNA. I suspect old German tribes were very brutal to non-conformists.

    The insane self-sacrifice 'humanism' is very widespread all over West. I had a conversation last week with a Dutch man and a Swedish woman - they yelled at me for East-Central Europe not opening up its borders to bunga-bunga migrants. (We in the Visegrad 4 countries are still European, white and Christian.) They said that the world has to be 'open', that we cannot be an 'island', that we are all 'one humanity'...predictable and very passionate. The problem was that those were sincerely held beliefs.

    There is no way to argue with them. 50% plus of Germans have voted themselves more of the same. Not that 4 more years under Merkel will be that dramatic. But not punishing a party (and politicians who led it) for the 2015 Merkel million men march establishes that there are no consequences in Europe today. That is scary.

    Passion

    I despise this word. It perfectly describes minds of contemporary progressives. Passion and feelings and not a shred of common sense.

  76. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Everyone has probably already seen this, but:

    “‘We are not calling for the slaughter of white people – at least for now’: South African parliament votes to SEIZE white-owned land as experts warn of violent repercussions”, Ben Hill, MailOline and AFP, 28 February 2018:

    “…The motion for ‘expropriation without compensation’ passed by a landslide…

    …It was brought about by Julius Malema who said white farmers are ‘criminals’…

    …The country’s constitution is now likely to be amended to allow for the confiscation of white-owned land without compensation…

    …the policy was a key factor in new president Cyril Ramaphosa’s platform

    …the time for ‘reconciliation is over’. ‘Now is the time for justice,’…

    …a motion brought by radical Marxist opposition leader Julius Malema…

    …Mr Malema… In 2016 he told his supporters he was ‘not calling for the slaughter of white people – at least for now’

    …A 2017 South African government audit found white people owned 72 per cent of farmland…”

    “Marxism Again: South African Parliament Votes to Seize Land From White Farmers”, Michael W. Chapman, CNS News, March 1, 2018:

    “…the civil rights group AfriForum, said the phrase “expropriation without compensation” was “semantic fraud.” What is happening is “nothing more than racist theft,”…”

    “We are going for your white man in PE, we are going to cut the throat – Julius Malema”, News24, 28 February 2018:

    “…“We are going to remove a mayor of PE. Not because he stole the money or anything. Uh Uh. Becaue we want to teach these white people that we mean business when we say expropriation of land without compensation. So yesterday DA voted against us and we said ‘eh heh’ you think we are playing. We are going for your white man in PE. We are going to cut the throat. Just to show you that we too don’t owe you anything.”

    “We can change anytime. We don’t care about white feelings, we don’t care about the feelings of voters of the DA. They can go to hell”

    …Malema also emphasised that there was no turning back on their call for the state to own all the land in the country…

    …said …once all land is declared to the state, those previously disadvantaged can be prioritised for redistribution…”

    Julius Malema (wikipedia).

    Frantz Fanon (wikipedia): “a Martinican psychiatrist, philosopher, revolutionary, and writer whose works are influential in the fields of post-colonial studies, critical theory, and Marxism… Pan-Africanist… concerned with the psychopathology of colonization…”

  77. @Enochian
    I dislike the French, but I don't dislike them enough to wish this upon them.

    You have to remember 1/3 of the voters went for Le Pen. I am not saying that means they are all good, but at 1/3 doesn’t seem to support what is happening. To say you hate all the French ignores that there is a significant chunk of the population that is not on board with what you assume the French support.

    Based upon US government action, international and domestic, I am sure a lot of people would say they hate Americans. But there is a significant chunk of people like us on blogs like this who are vehemently opposed to current US policy.

    I have never been to France, but I would not be surprised if a detached elite, aided by a propagandist media is pushing its policies downward against a population too afraid to sacrifice their social/economic positions by resisting. I think that is true in the US and probably so in most Euro nations.

  78. Africa is now home to the world’s largest migrant populations

    https://qz.com/1220795/pew-research-sub-saharan-africa-is-home-to-growing-global-migration/

    “A majority of those leaving is forced out by conflicts”

    One thing immigration realists have to confront is military and foreign policy. If you don’t want immigrants, you need to stop wars. The Harding Administration was surprisingly coherent, anti-immigration at home, anti-militarist abroad (which cut off the flow of war and economic refugees).

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    If you don’t want immigrants, you need to stop wars.
     
    Stopping war is all well and good; however I'd have you take note that it's never happened in all of human history. Meanwhile mass migrations on the scale we're now experiencing are extremely rare--in terms of absolute numbers they are unprecedented. So your equation is somewhat arguable.
  79. Africa must be demographically quarantined in order to prevent the Africans from leaving that area of the globe. Take the resources and leave the Africans is the shorthand version. The Russians and Chinese will have no problem working with the American Empire on that one.

    Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel must be exiled to Africa. I would think an Ebola-stricken section of Africa would do quite nicely for those two evil, baby boomer scumbags, Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel.

    Tweet from 2015:

  80. @Beckow

    ...Germans seem quite extremist to me...
     
    They don't just 'seem', they are extremist. Something clicked and off they went into being hyper-human. Germans like structure and dislike nuance, so propaganda works better on them than in other societies. They are also very afraid of society disapproval deep in their DNA. I suspect old German tribes were very brutal to non-conformists.

    The insane self-sacrifice 'humanism' is very widespread all over West. I had a conversation last week with a Dutch man and a Swedish woman - they yelled at me for East-Central Europe not opening up its borders to bunga-bunga migrants. (We in the Visegrad 4 countries are still European, white and Christian.) They said that the world has to be 'open', that we cannot be an 'island', that we are all 'one humanity'...predictable and very passionate. The problem was that those were sincerely held beliefs.

    There is no way to argue with them. 50% plus of Germans have voted themselves more of the same. Not that 4 more years under Merkel will be that dramatic. But not punishing a party (and politicians who led it) for the 2015 Merkel million men march establishes that there are no consequences in Europe today. That is scary.

    The insanity is widespread throughout the West because people are not cynical enough. Propaganda doesn’t work on cynics. Many intelligent people are quite gullible. Whether this is due to the fact that the West has been “on top” (high standard of living, lack of struggle) for decades or it’s something more genetic, I’m not sure. Could also be due to media – as someone pointed out in another thread, don’t underestimate the influence that messages from fiction (Harry Potter, comic books, Star Wars, etc) have had on millennials.

  81. @rogue-one
    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe? Why would China be willing a significant cost in terms of reputation to protect Europe? And a weak, divided, poor Europe means a weaker west making Chinese hegemony easier.

    If I were a cold blooded Chinese, I wouldn't two shits about migration from Africa to Europe. I would care about access to African raw materials and African markets. I would in fact encourage migration of ambitious young men from Africa to Europe to reduce tensions and decrease risks of revolution that may jeopardize the Chinese access to Africa.

    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe?

    The Chinese, along with the other NE Asians, are after all honorary whites. And we all are pretty much in the same boat with the threat from the global south. The Chinese have had a beneficial trade relationship with Europe and North America. And it makes sense for them to want to continue it. We are past the point where Europe is going to militarily threaten China’s territory and vice versa. Though I can see the Chinese wanting the USA’s military power to diminish, or at least BTFO of east Asia.

    If Europe descends into chaos it cannot help China. Ditto for North America. Their markets will not only be diminished, but having barbarians in potential possession of advanced weapons is not conducive to harmony. And the Chinese seem to love harmony.

    Also if Europe does indeed fall, it’s a good assumption islam will be in the driver’s seat. Given China’s problems with its muslim population, this is probably not good. It will only embolden islam to further takeover every last bit of ground on the planet. China will have a hard time resisting this.

    China is on the path to being the largest economic nation on earth, if it isn’t already there yet. Wouldn’t they rather be the top dog in a nicer world, then in a giant shith*le with the barbarians increasingly at their gates?

    • Replies: @Samuel Skinner
    Unless the Chinese grand plan is 'watch western civilization burn, unleash bioweapons, rule world'. In which case sitting back and watching everyone murder each other is in their best interests. The best part about this plan? It eliminates potential threats permanently. Given the last dynasty's fell to external threats this could insure the rule of the current clique and their descendants for centuries.
    , @Anonymous
    How exactly would China be able to control Europe's borders and migration patterns without taking over Europe and that part of the world, which would be resisted by Europe and that part of the world? The African migration is occurring with the complicity or acquiescence of Europe's leaders and much of its populace, so China would have to effectively take over Europe before taking over its border policies. This would be resisted more strongly than the African migration itself, because it would involve an explicit, formal takeover by a nation-state, rather than the more dispersed, decentralized migration of poor Africans. Enoch Powell made a similar point about how a German invasion would be more resisted and result in civil war in Britain than the mass immigration of blacks and South Asians into Britain.
  82. @ThreeCranes
    As I said in a previous post, coherence is what constitutes identity. Coherence today is everyone showing up to work on time. Everyone shows up to work because they are in debt. They are in debt because they don't earn enough to pay for their basic needs. Housing, transportation and health require that they take out long term loans. The formerly East-European Jewish financiers issue this debt. The financiers too are in debt. They borrowed money to buy all the (formerly independent, euro/white owned) industries at which the workers work. So the workers are paying off debt to the financiers who use that money to buy the worker's place of employment.

    Because the workers are aging they don't buy as much as family-formation-age consumers. They stop borrowing. The flow of interest payments to the financiers dries up. Because the financiers have moved industries overseas to arbitrage labor costs, the tax base has eroded and governments have run up huge debts . The only way to pay these debts is to inflate them away which further erodes purchasing power. Reduced consumption further pinches the financiers who have to service the debt they incurred in buying the productive apparatus of society. To service their debt, the financiers must boost consumption. The only way to do this is to bring in a new crop of consumers. Africans are prolific breeders. This means opening the borders to these potential customers. The economic planning of the experts is crude expansion, nothing more.

    Ultimately, the productive apparatus is owned by a new, different race of people and the debt slaves too are a different race of people. The money used to buy the system out from under the former owner/operators was entirely fictional, all of it borrowed and payed off with the interest stream generated by loaning the worker the money he needed to buy his own life's necessities. The profit generated by the labor of the worker is cash in hand for the new race of owners who, having no emotional ties to the workers or their homeland, live like Royalty in walled communities which are guarded by private mercenary armies or they live abroad in the other country in which they hold dual citizenship.

    And how does your theory explain Japan?

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Japan owns its own debt. Also it runs a trade surplus.
  83. @Whiskey
    Wrong. First, not enough young White men to guard the coast. Africans will pour in particularly in Spain and Italy. Second, no willingness on oligarchs to holkd back.

    Only prayer for Europe is Russia invading and even then they might fill it with Africans.

    Wrong. First, not enough young White men to guard the coast

    Come on Whiskey. It’s not like you have to form a human chain to guard the coast. It is very easy to guard the coast of Europe because, A) there is no enemy navy to deal with, B) the landing craft used are slow and overloaded, and C) modern drones reduce significantly the number of people needed.

    The only thing lacking is the will to fire. If you could somehow wave a wand and tomorrow all the Europeans actually treated trespassers to their borders like the North Koreans do, the migration crisis would stop in a few days. Armed drones launching a Hellfire into a couple of overloaded boats would completely stop this so called force of nature.

    • Agree: Anonym
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Yes, but back here in the real world, all the MSM has to do is publish a single photo of a single dead child on the beach and we'll have to let in another 20 million.
  84. @asdf
    Zero population growth used to be the dream. Better for the environment. Better for workers. Better for women.

    Now we are supposed to fear depopulation. We'll all be old. We'll lack energy. This is the real problem.

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?

    We need worldwide Negative Population Growth (NPG); right now we have 2x (maybe 4x) the homo sapiens we can handle for a truly sustainable planetary ecosystem. In 1910 there were 1.7 billion we are now at 7.6!!! Why?

    • Agree: Peter Johnson
    • Replies: @Anonym
    We need worldwide Negative Population Growth (NPG); right now we have 2x (maybe 4x) the homo sapiens we can handle for a truly sustainable planetary ecosystem. In 1910 there were 1.7 billion we are now at 7.6!!! Why?

    Partly it is because of Christian-background morality of "feeding the animals" basically. People who are too stupid to figure out how to care for themselves are given European created medicine and technology, e.g. wells etc. If several tens of million of them couldn't come up with something beyond a mud hut, we basically create 10 times the number of people who are still violent and useless.

    But that is not important because muh feelz. A starving child might cry. Bjorn Lomborg might emote that the greatest good we can achieve in the world is to raise the Malthusian limits on nations of retards. Meanwhile our people won't procreate, because European nations use fossil fuels or something.

    Then there is also the reality that other people realize that one of the simple things you can do is outbreed the tribes and peoples whose land you want, and then either militarily take them over or simply travel to their lands.
  85. @istevefan

    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe?
     
    The Chinese, along with the other NE Asians, are after all honorary whites. And we all are pretty much in the same boat with the threat from the global south. The Chinese have had a beneficial trade relationship with Europe and North America. And it makes sense for them to want to continue it. We are past the point where Europe is going to militarily threaten China's territory and vice versa. Though I can see the Chinese wanting the USA's military power to diminish, or at least BTFO of east Asia.

    If Europe descends into chaos it cannot help China. Ditto for North America. Their markets will not only be diminished, but having barbarians in potential possession of advanced weapons is not conducive to harmony. And the Chinese seem to love harmony.

    Also if Europe does indeed fall, it's a good assumption islam will be in the driver's seat. Given China's problems with its muslim population, this is probably not good. It will only embolden islam to further takeover every last bit of ground on the planet. China will have a hard time resisting this.

    China is on the path to being the largest economic nation on earth, if it isn't already there yet. Wouldn't they rather be the top dog in a nicer world, then in a giant shith*le with the barbarians increasingly at their gates?

    Unless the Chinese grand plan is ‘watch western civilization burn, unleash bioweapons, rule world’. In which case sitting back and watching everyone murder each other is in their best interests. The best part about this plan? It eliminates potential threats permanently. Given the last dynasty’s fell to external threats this could insure the rule of the current clique and their descendants for centuries.

  86. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Saxon said:

    Democracy is a fake, illusory system, especially when … there is a monopoly control over the means of mass communicating information.

    Oy vey, don’t criticize the media goy. Don’t you know that the free press is essential to democracy? And, what could be more free than being monopolized by a half dozen billionaire Jews?

    I mean, just ask Boris Yeltsin. He couldn’t have been happier!

    Criticizing, trust-busting, regulating or nationalizing the media into the hands of patriots is a very bad idea. Trust me. Would I lie? Whatever you do, don’t look at how Israel regulates its media. That might give you evil nationalistic ideas.

  87. The collapse of birthrates throughout the Western world is emphatically not the result of economic malaise or any other such crudely materialist cause. And as can be seen from the slightness of effects that even deliberately pro-natalist economic policies have managed to achieve where they have been employed (e.g. Russia), there is no amount of policy tweaking that can do anything to reverse the overall population decline.

    This childlessness is a result of the metaphysical exhaustion of the Western culture. Children are not had because, in the pulse-less and land-alien intellect of the modern urban West, they simply aren’t wanted. It must be reiterated here that immigration will do nothing to offset this problem. The TFR of every Western country is still below the replacement rate despite the presence of supposedly “fertile” immigrant groups. While it is lamentable in the extreme that these immigrants account for a disproportionate share of the youngest age cohorts and that, if this situation is left unaltered, their descendants will significantly alter the ethnic makeup of Europe, these groups are not self-sustaining and their reproductive success is entirely the result of the largess of their host countries. When that generosity is withdrawn these groups will either leave or die off; but whats more, even among those who remain, their birthrate will, within 1 or 2 generations, come down to the low European average as they fall under the spell of Western exhaustion.

    Contrary to the viewpoint of some who believe that population size is simply a matter of breeding up to the level of available resources, there is an instinct within a community for its ideal size. The reason that there are so few European births is because there are so few European deaths. The enormous Baby Boom generation is still mostly among the living, and they continue to occupy all the available psycho-social niches within their respective communities. We should see a modest uptick in European births as the Boom finally dies off, but this will only result in a temporary decrease in the pace of decline, not a reversal. There is nothing we can do to avoid the collapse. We must ride the downward wave until society can stabilize at a much lower level of complexity.

    • Replies: @istevefan

    The reason that there are so few European births is because there are so few European deaths.
     
    And Europe is at a record population level. The same can be said for Japan. Though Japan might have lost a few million from its high total, it is still significantly more populous than it was during WW2 when it took over a large chunk of the Pacific. Unfortunately for Europe, any slack that might have developed from the die-off of baby boomers has been given to third worlders. So the environmental conditions which caused them to throttle back on having kids will not change. While in Japan the ethnic Japanese will be able to fill the void once enough of the older generation has moved on.
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    There is nothing we can do to avoid the collapse. We must ride the downward wave until society can stabilize at a much lower level of complexity.
     
    Your prediction does not quantify the downward trend, nor the inflection point where we turn the corner. We do well to protect ourselves (consider the expansion of conceal-carry enabling legislation) but claiming certainty, or possible, outcomes, is questionable at best, and, at worst, worthy of an angry Jack Hanson castigation.

    You marshal some facts, and tie them together, but

    this will only result in a temporary decrease in the pace of decline, not a reversal.
     
    is speculation. In the face of a dishonest regime, good must hide itself until its hour is come. And its hour will come.
  88. @rogue-one
    OT:

    Angela Merkel is back in power for next 4 years. If the Germans are stupid enough to elect that crazy woman after her Million Men March, perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation. The African migrants can safely move to Europe for another four years.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/world/europe/germany-spd-merkel.html

    perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation.

    Trump didn’t get the popular vote and if Sanders had run, wouldn’t have won.

    The AfD have been making enormous progress that is totally inline with the rate of immigration. The political reaction is taking place as fast as it can given the cultural constraints inflicted on Germany by the US and through Hollywood. The post-war system in Germany is also of US-design and is designed to specifically frustrate these things.

    Political revolutions don’t occur in that manner and never have. Indeed most of the time the revolutionaries never get power, they influence their competitors to implement their policies.

    • Replies: @Moses

    Trump didn’t get the popular vote and if Sanders had run, wouldn’t have won.
     
    Sanders, the Communist? When he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont in the 80s people didn't wear "People's Republic of Burlington" t-shirts with red stars for nothing.

    And btw, "Champion of the poor and downtrodden" Sanders has 3 homes -- 1 in DC, 1 in Burlington and a nice lakefront vacation home in Vermont.

    It is to laugh. Trump would have beaten Bernie like a drum.

  89. @asdf
    Zero population growth used to be the dream. Better for the environment. Better for workers. Better for women.

    Now we are supposed to fear depopulation. We'll all be old. We'll lack energy. This is the real problem.

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?

    It was a bait-and-switch. “Have fewer children! Oh and by the way we’re going to bring in a nominal amount of useless people who are wholly dependent on state handouts at your expense which will make your birth rate plummet far below replacement rate once enough of them are settled here, and we’re not going to give you a choice in the matter.”

  90. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @istevefan

    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe?
     
    The Chinese, along with the other NE Asians, are after all honorary whites. And we all are pretty much in the same boat with the threat from the global south. The Chinese have had a beneficial trade relationship with Europe and North America. And it makes sense for them to want to continue it. We are past the point where Europe is going to militarily threaten China's territory and vice versa. Though I can see the Chinese wanting the USA's military power to diminish, or at least BTFO of east Asia.

    If Europe descends into chaos it cannot help China. Ditto for North America. Their markets will not only be diminished, but having barbarians in potential possession of advanced weapons is not conducive to harmony. And the Chinese seem to love harmony.

    Also if Europe does indeed fall, it's a good assumption islam will be in the driver's seat. Given China's problems with its muslim population, this is probably not good. It will only embolden islam to further takeover every last bit of ground on the planet. China will have a hard time resisting this.

    China is on the path to being the largest economic nation on earth, if it isn't already there yet. Wouldn't they rather be the top dog in a nicer world, then in a giant shith*le with the barbarians increasingly at their gates?

    How exactly would China be able to control Europe’s borders and migration patterns without taking over Europe and that part of the world, which would be resisted by Europe and that part of the world? The African migration is occurring with the complicity or acquiescence of Europe’s leaders and much of its populace, so China would have to effectively take over Europe before taking over its border policies. This would be resisted more strongly than the African migration itself, because it would involve an explicit, formal takeover by a nation-state, rather than the more dispersed, decentralized migration of poor Africans. Enoch Powell made a similar point about how a German invasion would be more resisted and result in civil war in Britain than the mass immigration of blacks and South Asians into Britain.

    • Replies: @istevefan
    I don't know how the Chinese would stop it. My comment was written to suggest that China probably does not want Europe to become another Africa or middle east.

    Of course if the Chinese did feel their interests were threatened, they could follow the US example and try some sort of regime change. If I were China I'd want a functioning Europe for trade and exchange.
  91. Nation-wrecking mass immigration was driving the political campaign in Italy. I hope the new Italian government will begin a program of mass deportation to remove the non-Europeans from Italy. I also hope the new Italian government decides to depart from the EU and goes back to the lira. Italy might be the nation that kills the European Union, the European Central Bank and the euro currency.

  92. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    rogue-one wrote:

    Angela Merkel is back in power for next 4 years. If the Germans are stupid enough to elect that crazy woman after her Million Men March, perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation.

    Correct. Germans don’t want to exist. They are intentionally committing national suicide, in no small part due to the endless Holocaust propaganda shoved down their throats, telling them how evil they are.

    Muslim and African migrants quickly learn to call their hosts “Nazis” for suggesting that maybe they should limit how many more migrants they let in. The Germans cower and beg for mercy. “Please! Don’t use that word!” “Holocaust! Nazi! Holocaust! Nazi!” “Please, I’ll do anything you say, just stop!”

    Absurd, farcical, surreal and true.

    This isn’t unique to Germany, of course. The Holocaust is being used to, in effect, ethnically cleans all White people everywhere — except Israel. Anyone who balks at being made a minority in their own country is labeled a Nazi and told “this kind of thinking lead to the Holocaust.”

    The Holocaust is the foundational event that’s taught in post WWII Western society, and it is wielded, like a cattle prod, to beat us into a henpecked, pitiful little shadows of our former selves, and to justify heaping every nasty burden, every stinking pile of teeming wretched refuse on our societies, of which mass migration is just the most prominent and deadly example. The Holocaust is the West’s original sin, a sin that is visited upon every Western child, who is conditioned to worship it, and then used to bring about his end.

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    "The Knights Who Say Nazi" sounds like it has potential as an iStevey meme.
  93. @Selvar
    This is the primary reason I am glad to live in the good old U S of A. Hopefully, the oceans will protect us from The Walking Dead: Africa Edition. I can stand to live in a majority Mestizo/ East Asian society. I won't like it, but I could probably get by on a day to day basis. I mean Brazil is bad, but not *that* bad (there is even a confederate-descended white community there if I am not mistaken.) And hell, having an East Asian girlfriend seems to be something of a rite of passage on the Alt Right (looking at you, Derbyshire, Anglin, Spencer.)


    But a 90% majority Black/Muslim society? Hell. No. That is a fate worse than death. Of course, you won't have to wait long for death to come.

    @21 Selvar: ” I can stand to live in a majority Mestizo/ East Asian society. I won’t like it, but I could probably get by on a day to day basis. I mean Brazil is bad, but not *that* bad . . . ”

    Your children and grandchildren, if you do have any, will rightfully damn you for eternity for what you are bequeathing them.

    • Replies: @Selvar
    By the time I was born, the U.S. was already slated to be a majority nonwhite country. Hilarious that you think I had a say in "bequeathing" anything.
  94. @Triumph104
    In France, North African gangs have been violently attacking ethnic Chinese residents and even killed a Chinese man in 2016. The reason for the attacks -- the Chinese work hard and are successful.


    https://youtu.be/3A0VSz0msjE

    The American versions of African in Sacramento are attacking Asians at their homes and businesses as well. It’s a plague.

  95. @AnotherDad

    if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe.
     
    Sorry Erik, but that's crazy talk.

    I love America. This is my nation. I love the American West, and i'm probably most "at home" visiting Iowa--my ancestral heimat. But when i visit friends in the Rhineland or Bavaria, that is recognizably part of ancestral turf--i "get it". Likewise England. (I haven't been to Ireland yet--but i'll get there my retirement is young.) These places are the seat--the essential core--of the West, the womb of the white man.

    America is--sadly--already baked with "diversity". It's headed toward being Brazil. I'd like to save what can saved. But if the globo-scum would be appeased by deal where they had their globotopia here in return for Europe expelling the other and returning to being white ... i'd sign on to it. I would slug it out here in my homeland as long as it was tolerable. But knowing that white folks\the West was not going to perish, would be priceless.

    The West can't survive if the Western core is dead.

    Glad to claim you as a fellow Iowan!! In the 1996 exhibition on the Mall celebrating Iowa’s 150 years of statehood, there was a booth where a guide said that you could take an ethnic tour of Europe and never leave the borders of the state of Iowa. You’re right–we in North America need to remember our brothers in Europe, although I think that we need to be as alert as possible to preserve our “Europeanness” as much as we can in North America as well.

  96. @istevefan
    And how does your theory explain Japan?

    Japan owns its own debt. Also it runs a trade surplus.

    • Replies: @El Dato

    Japan owns its own debt.
     
    Uh, someone in "Japan" does the owning and someone else does the paying-back.
    , @istevefan
    So you are saying that if we owned our debt and still had a trade surplus, we never would have been inundated with 50 million third worlders?
  97. @Anonymous
    Strangely enough, the ancient Germanic tribes simply killed homosexuals out of hand. This is attested by various of the ancient authors.
    The English - ultimately derived from Germanic - word 'bad' as in 'no good' is derived from a word meaning 'homosexual or hermaphrodite'.
    It is speculated that many of the so-called 'bog bodies' regularly dredged up in northern Europe were originally 'ritually killed' homosexuals.

    This is not nice.

    But does this tell us that homesexuality is a development phenomenon, not genetic?

  98. @ThreeCranes
    Japan owns its own debt. Also it runs a trade surplus.

    Japan owns its own debt.

    Uh, someone in “Japan” does the owning and someone else does the paying-back.

  99. I know fellow isteve readers will be excited to see conversations here among native Iowans (myself included), extolling the virtues of The Hawkeye State.

    • Replies: @The Last Real Calvinist

    I know fellow isteve readers will be excited to see conversations here among native Iowans (myself included), extolling the virtues of The Hawkeye State.

     

    You bet!
  100. @asdf
    Zero population growth used to be the dream. Better for the environment. Better for workers. Better for women.

    Now we are supposed to fear depopulation. We'll all be old. We'll lack energy. This is the real problem.

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?

    At the point when the overpopulation was driven ONLY by People of Color. Then it became a sacred cause.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Damned good point. Wasn't that long ago that you were 'right-thinking' if you believed human population growth should be brought under control. Now you're 'racist' if you dare think that.
  101. @Moses

    A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur.
     
    No, it doesn't. The Euros have ample means to stop it any time they wish to.

    They don't wish to.

    The Italian navy is picking up Africans just off the coast of Libya and bringing them to Italy, no charge, hot soup free.

    That's all you need to know.

    How long until we have female official government employees to give the “migrants” taxpayer-funded blowjobs right there on the boats? It’s a bunch of men who refuge and migrate after all. There they are sitting presumably unblown. Do they even ask them the last time they had a blowjob? Do they care? FFS racists shaking my head.

    Within the year I’m guessing.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Stats show that white women achieve orgasm more reliably if their partner is 1) rich or 2) negro. What a dilemma, huh?
  102. @Anonymous
    rogue-one wrote:


    Angela Merkel is back in power for next 4 years. If the Germans are stupid enough to elect that crazy woman after her Million Men March, perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation.

     

    Correct. Germans don't want to exist. They are intentionally committing national suicide, in no small part due to the endless Holocaust propaganda shoved down their throats, telling them how evil they are.

    Muslim and African migrants quickly learn to call their hosts "Nazis" for suggesting that maybe they should limit how many more migrants they let in. The Germans cower and beg for mercy. "Please! Don't use that word!" "Holocaust! Nazi! Holocaust! Nazi!" "Please, I'll do anything you say, just stop!"

    Absurd, farcical, surreal and true.

    This isn't unique to Germany, of course. The Holocaust is being used to, in effect, ethnically cleans all White people everywhere -- except Israel. Anyone who balks at being made a minority in their own country is labeled a Nazi and told "this kind of thinking lead to the Holocaust."

    The Holocaust is the foundational event that's taught in post WWII Western society, and it is wielded, like a cattle prod, to beat us into a henpecked, pitiful little shadows of our former selves, and to justify heaping every nasty burden, every stinking pile of teeming wretched refuse on our societies, of which mass migration is just the most prominent and deadly example. The Holocaust is the West's original sin, a sin that is visited upon every Western child, who is conditioned to worship it, and then used to bring about his end.

    “The Knights Who Say Nazi” sounds like it has potential as an iStevey meme.

  103. @Enochian
    I dislike the French, but I don't dislike them enough to wish this upon them.

    Why do you dislike them? Ever been there or met one?

  104. @Intelligent Dasein
    The collapse of birthrates throughout the Western world is emphatically not the result of economic malaise or any other such crudely materialist cause. And as can be seen from the slightness of effects that even deliberately pro-natalist economic policies have managed to achieve where they have been employed (e.g. Russia), there is no amount of policy tweaking that can do anything to reverse the overall population decline.

    This childlessness is a result of the metaphysical exhaustion of the Western culture. Children are not had because, in the pulse-less and land-alien intellect of the modern urban West, they simply aren't wanted. It must be reiterated here that immigration will do nothing to offset this problem. The TFR of every Western country is still below the replacement rate despite the presence of supposedly "fertile" immigrant groups. While it is lamentable in the extreme that these immigrants account for a disproportionate share of the youngest age cohorts and that, if this situation is left unaltered, their descendants will significantly alter the ethnic makeup of Europe, these groups are not self-sustaining and their reproductive success is entirely the result of the largess of their host countries. When that generosity is withdrawn these groups will either leave or die off; but whats more, even among those who remain, their birthrate will, within 1 or 2 generations, come down to the low European average as they fall under the spell of Western exhaustion.

    Contrary to the viewpoint of some who believe that population size is simply a matter of breeding up to the level of available resources, there is an instinct within a community for its ideal size. The reason that there are so few European births is because there are so few European deaths. The enormous Baby Boom generation is still mostly among the living, and they continue to occupy all the available psycho-social niches within their respective communities. We should see a modest uptick in European births as the Boom finally dies off, but this will only result in a temporary decrease in the pace of decline, not a reversal. There is nothing we can do to avoid the collapse. We must ride the downward wave until society can stabilize at a much lower level of complexity.

    The reason that there are so few European births is because there are so few European deaths.

    And Europe is at a record population level. The same can be said for Japan. Though Japan might have lost a few million from its high total, it is still significantly more populous than it was during WW2 when it took over a large chunk of the Pacific. Unfortunately for Europe, any slack that might have developed from the die-off of baby boomers has been given to third worlders. So the environmental conditions which caused them to throttle back on having kids will not change. While in Japan the ethnic Japanese will be able to fill the void once enough of the older generation has moved on.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The entire world is at 'record population level' and has been for a very long time. We're at eight billion now, projected to reach ten billion by the middle of the century. Is the world a better place than when we were three or four billion? Will it be better off in 2050 with ten billion? Or with twelve billion by the end of the century?

    The tiny pockets of relative stability are always trotted out as cautionary tales to scare people into thinking we're going to vanish as a species some time next week. The fact is that only white people will be vanishing.

  105. @Anonymous
    North Africans can - and will- be relied upon to sniff the business opportunity smuggling untold thousands of 'migrants' to the fools and dupes of the EU.

    After all, all you have to is shove them a mile offshore, in an inflatable boat, and give a phone call and, Hey Presto!, the EU does all the rest!

    What's more this state of affairs *cannot and will not* ever change due to the lefty Economist judges of the ECJ.

    Has there ever been an easier way of making cash quick and fast?

    Sure beats hawking post pubescent puerile buttocks to western perves, growing 'Moroccan Black' , 'servicing' obsese cast-off old European have, or even raiding shipping Corsair style.

    What is there for the men of the Desert not to like?

    The S Italian mafia is heavily involved as well.

  106. @Anonymous
    How exactly would China be able to control Europe's borders and migration patterns without taking over Europe and that part of the world, which would be resisted by Europe and that part of the world? The African migration is occurring with the complicity or acquiescence of Europe's leaders and much of its populace, so China would have to effectively take over Europe before taking over its border policies. This would be resisted more strongly than the African migration itself, because it would involve an explicit, formal takeover by a nation-state, rather than the more dispersed, decentralized migration of poor Africans. Enoch Powell made a similar point about how a German invasion would be more resisted and result in civil war in Britain than the mass immigration of blacks and South Asians into Britain.

    I don’t know how the Chinese would stop it. My comment was written to suggest that China probably does not want Europe to become another Africa or middle east.

    Of course if the Chinese did feel their interests were threatened, they could follow the US example and try some sort of regime change. If I were China I’d want a functioning Europe for trade and exchange.

    • Replies: @Anonym
    Of course if the Chinese did feel their interests were threatened, they could follow the US example and try some sort of regime change. If I were China I’d want a functioning Europe for trade and exchange.

    Depends on what they want. If they want world domination, they focus on the next most powerful competitor (us). You export your diaspora there to assist in controlling them. You see that they are being brought low by PC, you continue that. Eventually they will cease to be much of a threat. When Europeans are gone, no one will care about human rights or genocide.

    At that point you go and clean house, country by country, and the Islamic and African savages will not put up a fight worth worrying about. Haven't you played Risk before?

    After that the empire will collapse, with different sub-Chinese ethnicities duking it out for supremacy.

    I don't think it will get that far, but European man must rediscover a spine and some testicles soonish.
  107. @ThreeCranes
    Japan owns its own debt. Also it runs a trade surplus.

    So you are saying that if we owned our debt and still had a trade surplus, we never would have been inundated with 50 million third worlders?

  108. @Ed
    It’s pure fantasy to think Europeans will allow millions of Africans to arrive at their door without any resistance.

    Another thing the black Africans have to pass through hostile territory to reach Europe, Arab controlled lands. As we’ve seen the Arabs have no problem with exploiting black Africans and reducing them to slavery. Italy easily bribed off Libyan gangsters to keep Africans at bay, migrations to Italy from Libya have dropped and the route is shifting towards Morocco to Spain.

    Africa is simply screwed. There will be little relief from its population explosion.

    I think the churches and other charities will continue to keep them fat, happy and clothed with new Oxfam outfits every day.

  109. @Moses

    A mass migration DOES NOT have to occur.
     
    No, it doesn't. The Euros have ample means to stop it any time they wish to.

    They don't wish to.

    The Italian navy is picking up Africans just off the coast of Libya and bringing them to Italy, no charge, hot soup free.

    That's all you need to know.

    Even the Norwegian and minuscule Irish navies are picking them up

  110. @Erik Sieven
    if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe. The real problem would be world wide African expansion.

    > if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe.

    The muslims will tear down every statue, every monument. Every. Single. One. Systematically. Completely. Mobs of muslim fanatics will break every stone, melt every length of bronze.

    But they will not be able to efface the books. Not for so long as one crusty old DVD with a Project Gutenberg archive survives.

    • Replies: @Erik Sieven
    muslims are only a short-term problem, no long-term problem. The long-term problem are Subsaharan Africans, whether muslim, christian or with the religion.
  111. @Anonymous
    Rather beats Cecil Rhodes old boast of 'Cape to Cairo' into a cocked hat.

    Rhodes wanted a railroad from Cairo to Capetown.

  112. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    More like Masculine Africa goes to Feminized Europe.

    This proves feminism is one big contradiction and one big disaster.

    It is about women and cucky men denouncing and castrating the masculine principle of society. Supposedly, this makes for a better society, but without the masculine principle, society becomes defenseless and wussy.

    Lacking defenses, the society is invaded by even Tougher Men. Since the West no longer has well-organized Tough Men to fend off the chaotic Tougher Men, the feminists eventually end up coming the thumb of Tougher Men.

    In the end, Feminism trades Tough Men for Tougher Men.

    Also, no society can last for long without a clear delineation of us and them.
    If ‘them’ can easily become ‘us’, then the ‘us’ has no special claim on the land since ‘them’ can claim it too.

    It’s like women can no longer claim womanhood since LGBTQ lunacy says any man can claim womanhood too simply because he feels like it.

    When essentialism is lost, one cannot defend any nation, identity, or interest. Anything can be anything. Illegal is an American, man is a woman, an African is a European, etc.

    It’s no longer about conservatives vs liberals.

    It’s between Essentialists vs Trivialists.

    • Replies: @Moses

    Also, no society can last for long without a clear delineation of us and them.
     
    Nothing can.

    Look at the fundamental unit of life, the humble cell. Its cell membrane determines what gets into and out of the cell. Dissolve the membrane, dissolve the cell. The organism dies.

    Border walls are the equivalent of cell membranes for nations. Israel knows this. So does pretty much every country ever except those created by ethnic Europeans. Weird.

    PS - Cell membranes don't work.

  113. http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2018/03/becoming-zimbabwe-south-africa-self.html

    The only ‘Africans’ who should be allowed into Europe go ignored.

    If they’re butchered, the West will just shrug its shoulders and praise fictional Wakanda.

  114. @El Dato
    Apparently Stephen Smith is a US journalist writing in french, and worked on the "Africa" section of Libération, a left-wing newspaper from 1986 to 2000, and has been at "Le Monde" from 2002 onwards

    He seems rather clearheaded in the "availabe resources" category. The introduction talks about the untenable population explosion of subsaharan Africa. Back in the 50s' the british colonial administrator for Nigeria saw it coming: he recommended to expedite the procedure for independence because the universal schooling program being rolled out simply could not be implemented due to the rapidly increasing population, and he didn't want the Brist to be left holding the bag on this.

    There is also a long exposition on the population die-off in equatorial Africa due to imported european infections. With exploitation added to the mix, die-off may have reached up 30% maybe 50%, that's plague level.

    Also, the author has delivered 16 other books on Africa. Quite the specialist.

    Here is another one from 2003:

    "Negrology: Why Africa is dying"

    https://www.amazon.fr/N%C3%A9grologie-Pourquoi-lAfrique-Stephen-Smith/dp/2702133347/

    40% of customers diss the work as racist dreck. So it's on my shopping list.

    “Negrology: Why Africa is dying”

    Heh, that’s a pun. necrology/negrology.

  115. @Altai

    perhaps Germans do not wish to exist as a nation.
     
    Trump didn't get the popular vote and if Sanders had run, wouldn't have won.

    The AfD have been making enormous progress that is totally inline with the rate of immigration. The political reaction is taking place as fast as it can given the cultural constraints inflicted on Germany by the US and through Hollywood. The post-war system in Germany is also of US-design and is designed to specifically frustrate these things.

    Political revolutions don't occur in that manner and never have. Indeed most of the time the revolutionaries never get power, they influence their competitors to implement their policies.

    Trump didn’t get the popular vote and if Sanders had run, wouldn’t have won.

    Sanders, the Communist? When he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont in the 80s people didn’t wear “People’s Republic of Burlington” t-shirts with red stars for nothing.

    And btw, “Champion of the poor and downtrodden” Sanders has 3 homes — 1 in DC, 1 in Burlington and a nice lakefront vacation home in Vermont.

    It is to laugh. Trump would have beaten Bernie like a drum.

  116. @Anon
    More like Masculine Africa goes to Feminized Europe.

    This proves feminism is one big contradiction and one big disaster.

    It is about women and cucky men denouncing and castrating the masculine principle of society. Supposedly, this makes for a better society, but without the masculine principle, society becomes defenseless and wussy.

    Lacking defenses, the society is invaded by even Tougher Men. Since the West no longer has well-organized Tough Men to fend off the chaotic Tougher Men, the feminists eventually end up coming the thumb of Tougher Men.

    In the end, Feminism trades Tough Men for Tougher Men.

    Also, no society can last for long without a clear delineation of us and them.
    If 'them' can easily become 'us', then the 'us' has no special claim on the land since 'them' can claim it too.

    It's like women can no longer claim womanhood since LGBTQ lunacy says any man can claim womanhood too simply because he feels like it.

    When essentialism is lost, one cannot defend any nation, identity, or interest. Anything can be anything. Illegal is an American, man is a woman, an African is a European, etc.

    It's no longer about conservatives vs liberals.

    It's between Essentialists vs Trivialists.

    Also, no society can last for long without a clear delineation of us and them.

    Nothing can.

    Look at the fundamental unit of life, the humble cell. Its cell membrane determines what gets into and out of the cell. Dissolve the membrane, dissolve the cell. The organism dies.

    Border walls are the equivalent of cell membranes for nations. Israel knows this. So does pretty much every country ever except those created by ethnic Europeans. Weird.

    PS – Cell membranes don’t work.

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    "Border walls are the equivalent of cell membranes for nations."

    Legal immigration is the transfection of a nation by it's rulers.

    --

    "Transfection is the process of deliberately introducing naked or purified nucleic acids into eukaryotic cells."

    "The word transfection is a blend of trans- and infection."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfection
  117. @anon
    We need worldwide Negative Population Growth (NPG); right now we have 2x (maybe 4x) the homo sapiens we can handle for a truly sustainable planetary ecosystem. In 1910 there were 1.7 billion we are now at 7.6!!! Why?

    We need worldwide Negative Population Growth (NPG); right now we have 2x (maybe 4x) the homo sapiens we can handle for a truly sustainable planetary ecosystem. In 1910 there were 1.7 billion we are now at 7.6!!! Why?

    Partly it is because of Christian-background morality of “feeding the animals” basically. People who are too stupid to figure out how to care for themselves are given European created medicine and technology, e.g. wells etc. If several tens of million of them couldn’t come up with something beyond a mud hut, we basically create 10 times the number of people who are still violent and useless.

    But that is not important because muh feelz. A starving child might cry. Bjorn Lomborg might emote that the greatest good we can achieve in the world is to raise the Malthusian limits on nations of retards. Meanwhile our people won’t procreate, because European nations use fossil fuels or something.

    Then there is also the reality that other people realize that one of the simple things you can do is outbreed the tribes and peoples whose land you want, and then either militarily take them over or simply travel to their lands.

  118. @istevefan
    I don't know how the Chinese would stop it. My comment was written to suggest that China probably does not want Europe to become another Africa or middle east.

    Of course if the Chinese did feel their interests were threatened, they could follow the US example and try some sort of regime change. If I were China I'd want a functioning Europe for trade and exchange.

    Of course if the Chinese did feel their interests were threatened, they could follow the US example and try some sort of regime change. If I were China I’d want a functioning Europe for trade and exchange.

    Depends on what they want. If they want world domination, they focus on the next most powerful competitor (us). You export your diaspora there to assist in controlling them. You see that they are being brought low by PC, you continue that. Eventually they will cease to be much of a threat. When Europeans are gone, no one will care about human rights or genocide.

    At that point you go and clean house, country by country, and the Islamic and African savages will not put up a fight worth worrying about. Haven’t you played Risk before?

    After that the empire will collapse, with different sub-Chinese ethnicities duking it out for supremacy.

    I don’t think it will get that far, but European man must rediscover a spine and some testicles soonish.

  119. The welfare state without borders is a ruinous illusion.

    It’s even worse than that.

    A country with a functioning economy and open borders is a ruinous illusion. The best economic prospect for a young, healthy person in Senegal is to migrate to France, because Senegal will never get its act together. Prospects in South Sudan, Somalia or Congo are even worse.

    The primary social achievement of Western Europe and its offshoots is the creation of high-trust societies that are capable of cooperation on a national scale. Some Asian countries have achieved the same thing. Africa has not.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The best economic prospect for a young, healthy person in Senegal is to migrate to France, because Senegal will never get its act together. Prospects in South Sudan, Somalia or Congo are even worse."

    Now, why is that several nations in Europe have difficulties "getting their act together"? Consider that Africa has been independent for only 60 years. Political instability, social unrest, and economic fluctuations all play a role in how and why groups here may have a low IQ. Remember, the Europeans put in place institutions for themselves, NOT Africans, during imperialism.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbbuTjntpGc

    Pay close attention from 5:10 to 6:22.

    "The primary social achievement of Western Europe and its offshoots is the creation of high-trust societies that are capable of cooperation on a national scale."

    You actually described the human race. Western Europeans do not have the monopoly of "social achievement" nor "high-trust".

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997396/
  120. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @rogue-one
    From France to South Africa, within one lifetime.

    From France to South Africa, within one lifetime.

    From Germany to South Africa…
    From England to South Africa…
    From America to South Africa…

    From every civilized Western Country.
    Right down the tubes.

    A dozen years ago, I moved from one of America’s largest metropolises to the suburbs of a second-tier city, largely because I got tired of being the only white guy wherever I went. Now the same thing has happened here. I was in the grocery store tonight and I was the only light-complected person, as well as the only person over 5′-6″ tall (I’m over 6 ft). All we have are the absolute dregs of the earth coming now. Trump was excoriated for speaking no more or less than the unvarnished truth.

    Sort of scary to think that (as many claim) these third-world countries are sending their best here. What does the future hold in store? Absolute wreckage of each and every single thing we used to hold dear. We’re not even allowed to mention this. We’re not even allowed to avoid it. We’re not even allowed to sequester ourselves slightly away from the path of this oncoming train wreck. No, we have to partake. Our enemies–who’ve run this country for decades now–won’t have it any other way.

  121. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Ed
    It’s pure fantasy to think Europeans will allow millions of Africans to arrive at their door without any resistance.

    Another thing the black Africans have to pass through hostile territory to reach Europe, Arab controlled lands. As we’ve seen the Arabs have no problem with exploiting black Africans and reducing them to slavery. Italy easily bribed off Libyan gangsters to keep Africans at bay, migrations to Italy from Libya have dropped and the route is shifting towards Morocco to Spain.

    Africa is simply screwed. There will be little relief from its population explosion.

    It’s pure fantasy to think Europeans will allow millions of Africans to arrive at their door without any resistance.

    What you call ‘pure fantasy’ is already happening.

    Think of the frog in the water as it approaches the boiling point. That’s how it happened in America. People did nothing because it seemed to happen slowly. Then more quickly, but ‘goodwhites’ stand guard at every institution and media outlet to instantly and completely demolish anyone who even notices.

    It became suicide–social, political, career, what have you–to recognize the reality around you. So people retreat into their mass-media entertainment, their Facebook and Twitter, and all of these things are carefully managed for them. What’s the ‘pure fantasy’ again?

  122. @Moses

    Also, no society can last for long without a clear delineation of us and them.
     
    Nothing can.

    Look at the fundamental unit of life, the humble cell. Its cell membrane determines what gets into and out of the cell. Dissolve the membrane, dissolve the cell. The organism dies.

    Border walls are the equivalent of cell membranes for nations. Israel knows this. So does pretty much every country ever except those created by ethnic Europeans. Weird.

    PS - Cell membranes don't work.

    “Border walls are the equivalent of cell membranes for nations.”

    Legal immigration is the transfection of a nation by it’s rulers.

    “Transfection is the process of deliberately introducing naked or purified nucleic acids into eukaryotic cells.”

    “The word transfection is a blend of trans- and infection.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfection

  123. @Samuel Skinner
    The problem is the US is in a left-wing purity spiral where people show their devotion to the cause by how much they hate white people. This generally ends with mass murder. Europe is blessed with invaders who are incapable of modern warfare and so may be better of when the tide turns.

    It’s a good question. What does the USA have in store for white people: mass slaughter or just enslavement? My guess is enslavement, with slaughter reserved for those who dare to resist.

    The mind-control masters of the mass media will have the vast majority of “fellow white people” agreeing that (as Louis C.K. said in his show) “we totally deserve it!”

  124. @rogue-one
    Why would China be interested in stopping migration from Africa to Europe? Why would China be willing a significant cost in terms of reputation to protect Europe? And a weak, divided, poor Europe means a weaker west making Chinese hegemony easier.

    If I were a cold blooded Chinese, I wouldn't two shits about migration from Africa to Europe. I would care about access to African raw materials and African markets. I would in fact encourage migration of ambitious young men from Africa to Europe to reduce tensions and decrease risks of revolution that may jeopardize the Chinese access to Africa.

    Your judgment is harsh and completely accurate.

  125. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Beckow

    ...Germans seem quite extremist to me...
     
    They don't just 'seem', they are extremist. Something clicked and off they went into being hyper-human. Germans like structure and dislike nuance, so propaganda works better on them than in other societies. They are also very afraid of society disapproval deep in their DNA. I suspect old German tribes were very brutal to non-conformists.

    The insane self-sacrifice 'humanism' is very widespread all over West. I had a conversation last week with a Dutch man and a Swedish woman - they yelled at me for East-Central Europe not opening up its borders to bunga-bunga migrants. (We in the Visegrad 4 countries are still European, white and Christian.) They said that the world has to be 'open', that we cannot be an 'island', that we are all 'one humanity'...predictable and very passionate. The problem was that those were sincerely held beliefs.

    There is no way to argue with them. 50% plus of Germans have voted themselves more of the same. Not that 4 more years under Merkel will be that dramatic. But not punishing a party (and politicians who led it) for the 2015 Merkel million men march establishes that there are no consequences in Europe today. That is scary.

    Germans like structure and dislike nuance, so propaganda works better on them than in other societies. They are also very afraid of society disapproval deep in their DNA.

    This comports with my experience too. Germans have corrected me here and there, exclaiming thus: “That’s not how it’s done!” And for a ‘race’ of people who pride themselves on their rationality, rationality never enters into it. It’s just a matter of what’s been deemed “correct”.

    It’s weird how many things they can do right, when you also look at what they do wrong. But I’ve no doubt many overseas say the same thing about Americans.

  126. @Intelligent Dasein
    The collapse of birthrates throughout the Western world is emphatically not the result of economic malaise or any other such crudely materialist cause. And as can be seen from the slightness of effects that even deliberately pro-natalist economic policies have managed to achieve where they have been employed (e.g. Russia), there is no amount of policy tweaking that can do anything to reverse the overall population decline.

    This childlessness is a result of the metaphysical exhaustion of the Western culture. Children are not had because, in the pulse-less and land-alien intellect of the modern urban West, they simply aren't wanted. It must be reiterated here that immigration will do nothing to offset this problem. The TFR of every Western country is still below the replacement rate despite the presence of supposedly "fertile" immigrant groups. While it is lamentable in the extreme that these immigrants account for a disproportionate share of the youngest age cohorts and that, if this situation is left unaltered, their descendants will significantly alter the ethnic makeup of Europe, these groups are not self-sustaining and their reproductive success is entirely the result of the largess of their host countries. When that generosity is withdrawn these groups will either leave or die off; but whats more, even among those who remain, their birthrate will, within 1 or 2 generations, come down to the low European average as they fall under the spell of Western exhaustion.

    Contrary to the viewpoint of some who believe that population size is simply a matter of breeding up to the level of available resources, there is an instinct within a community for its ideal size. The reason that there are so few European births is because there are so few European deaths. The enormous Baby Boom generation is still mostly among the living, and they continue to occupy all the available psycho-social niches within their respective communities. We should see a modest uptick in European births as the Boom finally dies off, but this will only result in a temporary decrease in the pace of decline, not a reversal. There is nothing we can do to avoid the collapse. We must ride the downward wave until society can stabilize at a much lower level of complexity.

    There is nothing we can do to avoid the collapse. We must ride the downward wave until society can stabilize at a much lower level of complexity.

    Your prediction does not quantify the downward trend, nor the inflection point where we turn the corner. We do well to protect ourselves (consider the expansion of conceal-carry enabling legislation) but claiming certainty, or possible, outcomes, is questionable at best, and, at worst, worthy of an angry Jack Hanson castigation.

    You marshal some facts, and tie them together, but

    this will only result in a temporary decrease in the pace of decline, not a reversal.

    is speculation. In the face of a dishonest regime, good must hide itself until its hour is come. And its hour will come.

  127. @Amasius
    How long until we have female official government employees to give the "migrants" taxpayer-funded blowjobs right there on the boats? It's a bunch of men who refuge and migrate after all. There they are sitting presumably unblown. Do they even ask them the last time they had a blowjob? Do they care? FFS racists shaking my head.

    Within the year I'm guessing.

    Stats show that white women achieve orgasm more reliably if their partner is 1) rich or 2) negro. What a dilemma, huh?

  128. @lavoisier

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?
     
    At the point when the overpopulation was driven ONLY by People of Color. Then it became a sacred cause.

    Damned good point. Wasn’t that long ago that you were ‘right-thinking’ if you believed human population growth should be brought under control. Now you’re ‘racist’ if you dare think that.

  129. @istevefan

    Wrong. First, not enough young White men to guard the coast
     
    Come on Whiskey. It's not like you have to form a human chain to guard the coast. It is very easy to guard the coast of Europe because, A) there is no enemy navy to deal with, B) the landing craft used are slow and overloaded, and C) modern drones reduce significantly the number of people needed.

    The only thing lacking is the will to fire. If you could somehow wave a wand and tomorrow all the Europeans actually treated trespassers to their borders like the North Koreans do, the migration crisis would stop in a few days. Armed drones launching a Hellfire into a couple of overloaded boats would completely stop this so called force of nature.

    Yes, but back here in the real world, all the MSM has to do is publish a single photo of a single dead child on the beach and we’ll have to let in another 20 million.

  130. @rogue-one
    Perhaps he is referring to this: Cape to Cairo Railway

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Punch_Rhodes_Colossus.png

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_to_Cairo_Railway

    Man, it’s hard to find draftsmanship like that anymore. Great cartoon.

  131. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @George
    Africa is now home to the world’s largest migrant populations

    https://qz.com/1220795/pew-research-sub-saharan-africa-is-home-to-growing-global-migration/

    "A majority of those leaving is forced out by conflicts"

    One thing immigration realists have to confront is military and foreign policy. If you don't want immigrants, you need to stop wars. The Harding Administration was surprisingly coherent, anti-immigration at home, anti-militarist abroad (which cut off the flow of war and economic refugees).

    If you don’t want immigrants, you need to stop wars.

    Stopping war is all well and good; however I’d have you take note that it’s never happened in all of human history. Meanwhile mass migrations on the scale we’re now experiencing are extremely rare–in terms of absolute numbers they are unprecedented. So your equation is somewhat arguable.

  132. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @istevefan

    The reason that there are so few European births is because there are so few European deaths.
     
    And Europe is at a record population level. The same can be said for Japan. Though Japan might have lost a few million from its high total, it is still significantly more populous than it was during WW2 when it took over a large chunk of the Pacific. Unfortunately for Europe, any slack that might have developed from the die-off of baby boomers has been given to third worlders. So the environmental conditions which caused them to throttle back on having kids will not change. While in Japan the ethnic Japanese will be able to fill the void once enough of the older generation has moved on.

    The entire world is at ‘record population level’ and has been for a very long time. We’re at eight billion now, projected to reach ten billion by the middle of the century. Is the world a better place than when we were three or four billion? Will it be better off in 2050 with ten billion? Or with twelve billion by the end of the century?

    The tiny pockets of relative stability are always trotted out as cautionary tales to scare people into thinking we’re going to vanish as a species some time next week. The fact is that only white people will be vanishing.

  133. @Buck Turgidson
    I know fellow isteve readers will be excited to see conversations here among native Iowans (myself included), extolling the virtues of The Hawkeye State.

    I know fellow isteve readers will be excited to see conversations here among native Iowans (myself included), extolling the virtues of The Hawkeye State.

    You bet!

  134. @BB753
    That's just what I fear. The Chinese deciding to let the African tide destroy Europe. "Better them than us!".

    Or maybe the Chinese would crush trans-Sahara smuggling in order to preserve Europe for Chinese tourists and as a steady marketplace and trading partner. Afro-chaos in Europe is not in China’s interest, particularly since Europe has nukes and navies. Maybe a one-child policy, or at least access to birth control without the meddling of misguided Global Gag Rule policies, would also be in the offing.

  135. @3g4me
    @21 Selvar: " I can stand to live in a majority Mestizo/ East Asian society. I won’t like it, but I could probably get by on a day to day basis. I mean Brazil is bad, but not *that* bad . . . "

    Your children and grandchildren, if you do have any, will rightfully damn you for eternity for what you are bequeathing them.

    By the time I was born, the U.S. was already slated to be a majority nonwhite country. Hilarious that you think I had a say in “bequeathing” anything.

  136. @BB753
    That's just what I fear. The Chinese deciding to let the African tide destroy Europe. "Better them than us!".

    That’s just what I fear. The Chinese deciding to let the African tide destroy Europe. “Better them than us!”.

    When the Chinese and Japanese look at what is happening in Europe, they must be shaking their heads in disbelief that we could be so stupid. Our self-destruction must be as incomprehensible to them as hara-kiri is to us.

    • Agree: BB753
    • Replies: @BB753
    The Chinese, particularly, hold Blacks in contempt. Really, the average Chinese I've met shares the same opinion of Blacks as a Ku Klux Klan member.
    , @Anonymous
    Indeed so. It can only add not only to their contempt, but their conviction that we deserve to be vanquished.

    It was all so neat, from our perspective. Import nation-wreckers and give them control of the Flow of Information / Production of Truth / Mass Media. Done and Done.

  137. @for-the-record
    Looking into this a bit (in French) Stephen Smith seems to be a pseudonym for Steve Sailer!

    In 2003 he wrote a book entitled Négrologie : pourquoi l'Afrique meurt ("Negrology: why Africa is dying"). He starts by reviewing the overall disastrous situation in Africa 40 years after independence ("Afro-optimism is an information crime") and asks "Why?". His answer: "In large part, because it is committing suicide". An essential point made by the book is that the historical responsibilities of Western countries for the disastrous current state of Africa are exaggerated, and that its underdevelopment is more properly attributed to African sociological characteristics.

    His current book focuses on Steve's famous chart and its implications. Among the points he makes:

    1. The idea that by helping Africa to "develop" one can stem the tide of immigrants is a delusion, because aid to Africa essentially serves as a subsidy for emigration -- it is not the poorest who are leaving Africa for Europe, but rather those who have achieved a certain economic level (and are in a position to pay the substantial fees involved).

    2. The idea that immigration will aid the population structure of Europe, by reducing the "dependency ratio", is likewise a delusion. Once account is taken of the fact that immigrants will have more dependents than "locals" and will require more services, the effect is actually the contrary.

    3. Hence how can one justify a priori that it is better to "welcome" immigrants than to encourage residents to have more children?

    Here is an interview of the author on "mainstream" French television last month:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTMl2sM8lz8

    Several observations:

    1. He comes across very well, not at all political, simply setting out the facts in a logical and dispassionate manner. It is difficult to imagine an interview such as this on "mainstream"US television.

    2. None of his books (he has written or co-authored more than 15) has been translated into English, which is interesting since he has been teaching at Duke since 2007. Protection against thought police?

    “Protection against thought police?”

    Probably the converse: policing us against prohibited thought.

  138. @Seamus Padraig
    You're probably right. If Europe has any hope at all, it depends on France. Anything good to report since the election of the Rothschild boy-toy last year?

    1. On asylum applications: He is trying to protect his right flank by making tough sounds on immigration. He is trying to introduce a law that makes deporting failed asylum seekers easier.

    That said, France cannot accept even the accepted asylum seekers. I recently visited Paris and spent some time around La Chapelle. You see thousands of recent migrants. I also talked to some who are coming from sub saharan Africa and even Sri Lanka and manage to get asylum. There was an article in Le Monde where the mayors were complaining that they cannot deal with thousands of asylum grantees every month.

    So, in conclusion, he is making some adjustments to asylum system. But in grand scheme of things, it is inconsequential. France is on its way to becoming South Africa, or at least Lebanon (with several communities that distrust each other, rather than a common unified nation). And Macron wouldn’t stop it.

    2. On Europe: He is a big supporter of Angela Merkel. He would like to reform the EU to give it even more power over the member countries. I don’t see how a sensible Frenchman can support his EU policies.

    3. On foreign policy & military: I actually like his foreign policy & military policy. He seems to be a true realist, is not a fan of neoconservatism, and understands that France needs hard power. That said, he did cut down defense budget. So maybe a bit of doublespeak.

    4. Popularity: He possess some charisma (or maybe the media loves him, like Obama in America). His popularity is quite high.

    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Great. Thanks for your report!
  139. @Bardon Kaldian
    Of course it is moronic hysteria. And no one has noticed one small detail: Muslim Arabs in Maghreb (Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria,..) won't let, anytime, to be inundated by black Africans.

    And this is just a small piece that crushes this entire catastrophic narrative.

    That’s no problem. Western militaries will open humanitarian corridors.

  140. @James N. Kennett

    That’s just what I fear. The Chinese deciding to let the African tide destroy Europe. “Better them than us!”.
     
    When the Chinese and Japanese look at what is happening in Europe, they must be shaking their heads in disbelief that we could be so stupid. Our self-destruction must be as incomprehensible to them as hara-kiri is to us.

    The Chinese, particularly, hold Blacks in contempt. Really, the average Chinese I’ve met shares the same opinion of Blacks as a Ku Klux Klan member.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Really, the average Chinese I’ve met shares the same opinion of Blacks as a Ku Klux Klan member."

    Strange, the average Chinese I've met hold a different opinion of the darkies. Maybe it depends on where that person lives in China.

    Even more strange are why the Chinese are moving TO Africa.

    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2017-01/14/content_27952426.htm
  141. @for-the-record
    No, just a money decision. Academic books don’t make money.

    That's what academic presses are for, in theory there would be a number that would be interested in his books (including Duke University Press).

    Someone will have to do it for free as a public service.

    And run afoul of copyright law? If the author wanted it out there, or at least parts of it, he is the ideal person to do the translation, he is a native English speaker (father American, mother German).

    The implication is that his books are being suppressed, and I think that is hogwash.

    He isn’t technically an academic. I think he’s a journalist and an adjunct at Duke.

    Nor did I ever suggest that anyone bootleg his work. I meant offer one’s services to the author.

    BTW, I believe his books are published by a (((publishing company))) in France. Make of that what you will. Since it’s the custom on this blog to point out the (((blood quantum))) of everyone referred to herein, I think pointing that out is only fair.

    • Replies: @for-the-record
    The implication is that his books are being suppressed, and I think that is hogwash.

    I wasn't suggesting that his books were being suppressed, rather that he himself chose not to have them published in English.

    Nor did I ever suggest that anyone bootleg his work. I meant offer one’s services to the author.

    I also pointed out, given that English is (one of his) native languages, he would be the best placed to translate them if he really wanted to, so that I don't think he would require my services. I have ordered his latest book and after reading it, if I think it is something that I could do a good job on (I have actually done professional translations), I will send him an email asking when the book will come out in English, and saying that if he does not want to translate it himself I would be willing do do so.

    He isn’t technically an academic. I think he’s a journalist and an adjunct at Duke.

    I guess it depends on your definition of academic. He has an undergraduate degree from the Sorbonne in Paris and a Ph.D. from the Free University of Berlin. His official title at Duke is "Professor of the Practice of African and African American Studies", and he is "Associate Chair" of the Duke University Center for African & African-American Studies.

    Here is a list of courses he has taught at Duke:


    AAAS 103: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    AAAS 310S: Conflict Analysis in Africa (case studies)
    AAAS 312: War and Public Health in Africa
    AAAS 380: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality
    AAAS 380P: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality Preceptorial
    AAAS 491: Independent Study
    CULANTH 105: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    CULANTH 310S: Conflict Analysis in Africa (case studies)
    CULANTH 312: War and Public Health in Africa
    GLHLTH 312: War and Public Health in Africa
    HISTORY 129: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    HISTORY 372: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality
    ICS 110: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    ICS 364: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality
    POLSCI 108: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    PUBPOL 218S: Conflict Analysis in Africa (case studies)
    PUBPOL 333: War and Public Health in Africa
    ROMST 380: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality
    ROMST 380P: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality Preceptorial
    AAAS 337: Hollywood and Africa: Case Studies in Filmic Representation
    CULANTH 336: Hollywood and Africa: Case Studies in Filmic Representation
    ICS 337: Hollywood and Africa: Case Studies in Filmic Representation
     
    BTW, I believe his books are published by a (((publishing company))) in France.

    Yes, most of his books have been published by Calmann-Lévy. Not sure I would make too much of that, however, since Calmann-Lévy has been part of the Hachette group since 1993, and since it is known among other things for being the French publisher of Patricia Highsmith (The Talented Mr. Ripley, etc.).

  142. @rogue-one
    Fair enough.

    That said, CDU/CSU (Merkel Party) still won 34.70% and the second position went to SPD with 21.58% of seats . AfD was the third most popular party with 13.26% of seats (and 12.64 % share of votes).

    Despite witnessing a catastrophic act of national suicide, a majority of German citizens still votes for parties (CDU & SPD) that supported the suicide.

    I don't doubt that AfD will become popular. But what does it matter if it can never get more than 30% of votes? What if more than 50% of population will simply close their eyes and do what media tells them?

    Germans seem quite extremist to me. During 1930s they wanted to become the greatest evil in the world and destroyed the continent & their country. Today they want to become the greatest do-gooders in the world and will again destroy the continent and their country.

    I am not very optimistic about Germany. But I do hope my France survives, somehow.

    I don’t doubt that AfD will become popular. But what does it matter if it can never get more than 30% of votes? What if more than 50% of population will simply close their eyes and do what media tells them?

    Never underestimate the ability of people to avoid noticing things they don’t want to notice, or that it’s socially unacceptable to notice.

    That’s how we’ve got to the point we’re at now. Most people have, very successfully, managed not to notice the disastrous consequences of immigration, feminism, homosexual activism, envirofascism, etc etc.

    They don’t notice until they are personally affected. And these days they people can actually still manage not to notice when they are the ones personally affected.

    People want to conform. They want to be seen as good people who don’t think bad thoughts. If that means closing your eyes while your country is destroyed it’s a small price to pay.

  143. @asdf
    Zero population growth used to be the dream. Better for the environment. Better for workers. Better for women.

    Now we are supposed to fear depopulation. We'll all be old. We'll lack energy. This is the real problem.

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?

    Zero population growth used to be the dream. Better for the environment. Better for workers. Better for women.

    Now we are supposed to fear depopulation. We’ll all be old. We’ll lack energy. This is the real problem.

    At what point was this debate had and won by the pro growth side?

    It happened at about the time that the environmentalist movement was bought by the corporate sector.

  144. @Obsessive Contrarian
    The implication is that his books are being suppressed, and I think that is hogwash.

    He isn't technically an academic. I think he's a journalist and an adjunct at Duke.

    Nor did I ever suggest that anyone bootleg his work. I meant offer one's services to the author.

    BTW, I believe his books are published by a (((publishing company))) in France. Make of that what you will. Since it's the custom on this blog to point out the (((blood quantum))) of everyone referred to herein, I think pointing that out is only fair.

    The implication is that his books are being suppressed, and I think that is hogwash.

    I wasn’t suggesting that his books were being suppressed, rather that he himself chose not to have them published in English.

    Nor did I ever suggest that anyone bootleg his work. I meant offer one’s services to the author.

    I also pointed out, given that English is (one of his) native languages, he would be the best placed to translate them if he really wanted to, so that I don’t think he would require my services. I have ordered his latest book and after reading it, if I think it is something that I could do a good job on (I have actually done professional translations), I will send him an email asking when the book will come out in English, and saying that if he does not want to translate it himself I would be willing do do so.

    He isn’t technically an academic. I think he’s a journalist and an adjunct at Duke.

    I guess it depends on your definition of academic. He has an undergraduate degree from the Sorbonne in Paris and a Ph.D. from the Free University of Berlin. His official title at Duke is “Professor of the Practice of African and African American Studies”, and he is “Associate Chair” of the Duke University Center for African & African-American Studies.

    Here is a list of courses he has taught at Duke:

    AAAS 103: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    AAAS 310S: Conflict Analysis in Africa (case studies)
    AAAS 312: War and Public Health in Africa
    AAAS 380: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality
    AAAS 380P: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality Preceptorial
    AAAS 491: Independent Study
    CULANTH 105: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    CULANTH 310S: Conflict Analysis in Africa (case studies)
    CULANTH 312: War and Public Health in Africa
    GLHLTH 312: War and Public Health in Africa
    HISTORY 129: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    HISTORY 372: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality
    ICS 110: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    ICS 364: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality
    POLSCI 108: Introduction to African Studies (DS3 or DS4)
    PUBPOL 218S: Conflict Analysis in Africa (case studies)
    PUBPOL 333: War and Public Health in Africa
    ROMST 380: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality
    ROMST 380P: France and Africa: The Politics and Culture of (Post-)Coloniality Preceptorial
    AAAS 337: Hollywood and Africa: Case Studies in Filmic Representation
    CULANTH 336: Hollywood and Africa: Case Studies in Filmic Representation
    ICS 337: Hollywood and Africa: Case Studies in Filmic Representation

    BTW, I believe his books are published by a (((publishing company))) in France.

    Yes, most of his books have been published by Calmann-Lévy. Not sure I would make too much of that, however, since Calmann-Lévy has been part of the Hachette group since 1993, and since it is known among other things for being the French publisher of Patricia Highsmith (The Talented Mr. Ripley, etc.).

  145. I wasn’t suggesting that his books were being suppressed, rather that he himself chose not to have them published in English.

    I’m glad we cleared that one up. No one is suppressing his books. He chooses to have them published in French, not English. Which is a shame, IMO.

    “Not sure I would make too much of that, “

    Learn to take a joke. I make nothing of it, but in these environs, where a deranged allergy to names like (((Levy))) is rampant, it is important.

  146. @rogue-one
    1. On asylum applications: He is trying to protect his right flank by making tough sounds on immigration. He is trying to introduce a law that makes deporting failed asylum seekers easier.

    That said, France cannot accept even the accepted asylum seekers. I recently visited Paris and spent some time around La Chapelle. You see thousands of recent migrants. I also talked to some who are coming from sub saharan Africa and even Sri Lanka and manage to get asylum. There was an article in Le Monde where the mayors were complaining that they cannot deal with thousands of asylum grantees every month.

    So, in conclusion, he is making some adjustments to asylum system. But in grand scheme of things, it is inconsequential. France is on its way to becoming South Africa, or at least Lebanon (with several communities that distrust each other, rather than a common unified nation). And Macron wouldn't stop it.

    2. On Europe: He is a big supporter of Angela Merkel. He would like to reform the EU to give it even more power over the member countries. I don't see how a sensible Frenchman can support his EU policies.

    3. On foreign policy & military: I actually like his foreign policy & military policy. He seems to be a true realist, is not a fan of neoconservatism, and understands that France needs hard power. That said, he did cut down defense budget. So maybe a bit of doublespeak.

    4. Popularity: He possess some charisma (or maybe the media loves him, like Obama in America). His popularity is quite high.

    Great. Thanks for your report!

  147. @James N. Kennett

    That’s just what I fear. The Chinese deciding to let the African tide destroy Europe. “Better them than us!”.
     
    When the Chinese and Japanese look at what is happening in Europe, they must be shaking their heads in disbelief that we could be so stupid. Our self-destruction must be as incomprehensible to them as hara-kiri is to us.

    Indeed so. It can only add not only to their contempt, but their conviction that we deserve to be vanquished.

    It was all so neat, from our perspective. Import nation-wreckers and give them control of the Flow of Information / Production of Truth / Mass Media. Done and Done.

  148. The whole supposition that these people will just come to Europe on mass ( where in Europe ? ) and be unopposed is pretty far fetched and indeed this might only be possible if the elites in power now remain in power indefinitely and it is clear that they will NOT remain in power indeed our treacherous elites be it the eu or msm are in decline and the speed of their decline has been rather fast. The likes of the afd Salvini Le Pen Wilders are not going anywhere and are growing in popularity and credibility indeed Salvini may yet be PM and Nationalism is alive and well in Eastern Europe too both socially and politically . I have full faith that the European Peoples will take back control of our nations it is a matter of when not if. We are still the vast majority in all our countries and momentum is with nationalist or nationalist inspired parties.

  149. @Dave from Oz
    > if only the rest of world learns of it, it could be worth to sacrifice Europe. Western civilization would survive the loss of Europe.

    The muslims will tear down every statue, every monument. Every. Single. One. Systematically. Completely. Mobs of muslim fanatics will break every stone, melt every length of bronze.

    But they will not be able to efface the books. Not for so long as one crusty old DVD with a Project Gutenberg archive survives.

    muslims are only a short-term problem, no long-term problem. The long-term problem are Subsaharan Africans, whether muslim, christian or with the religion.

  150. @James N. Kennett

    The welfare state without borders is a ruinous illusion.
     
    It's even worse than that.

    A country with a functioning economy and open borders is a ruinous illusion. The best economic prospect for a young, healthy person in Senegal is to migrate to France, because Senegal will never get its act together. Prospects in South Sudan, Somalia or Congo are even worse.

    The primary social achievement of Western Europe and its offshoots is the creation of high-trust societies that are capable of cooperation on a national scale. Some Asian countries have achieved the same thing. Africa has not.

    “The best economic prospect for a young, healthy person in Senegal is to migrate to France, because Senegal will never get its act together. Prospects in South Sudan, Somalia or Congo are even worse.”

    Now, why is that several nations in Europe have difficulties “getting their act together”? Consider that Africa has been independent for only 60 years. Political instability, social unrest, and economic fluctuations all play a role in how and why groups here may have a low IQ. Remember, the Europeans put in place institutions for themselves, NOT Africans, during imperialism.

    Pay close attention from 5:10 to 6:22.

    “The primary social achievement of Western Europe and its offshoots is the creation of high-trust societies that are capable of cooperation on a national scale.”

    You actually described the human race. Western Europeans do not have the monopoly of “social achievement” nor “high-trust”.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997396/

  151. @BB753
    The Chinese, particularly, hold Blacks in contempt. Really, the average Chinese I've met shares the same opinion of Blacks as a Ku Klux Klan member.

    “Really, the average Chinese I’ve met shares the same opinion of Blacks as a Ku Klux Klan member.”

    Strange, the average Chinese I’ve met hold a different opinion of the darkies. Maybe it depends on where that person lives in China.

    Even more strange are why the Chinese are moving TO Africa.

    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2017-01/14/content_27952426.htm

    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Someone has to run the place since they clearly can't do it.
  152. @Corvinus
    "Really, the average Chinese I’ve met shares the same opinion of Blacks as a Ku Klux Klan member."

    Strange, the average Chinese I've met hold a different opinion of the darkies. Maybe it depends on where that person lives in China.

    Even more strange are why the Chinese are moving TO Africa.

    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2017-01/14/content_27952426.htm

    Someone has to run the place since they clearly can’t do it.

  153. Of course Africans can run their own nations. It’s just that outsiders continually interfere with their hands open for gimmedats.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.