The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Sailer in Taki's: Invade, Invite, Implode
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From new column in Taki’s Magazine:

Invade, Invite, Implode
by Steve Sailer

August 07, 2019

If a president cited crime statistics to rile up racial hatred, but his speech was immediately followed by a terrorist massacre, would he be criticized?

Well, not if he were Barack Obama, whose July 7, 2016,TV oration from Warsaw denouncing the police shootings of two black men was followed later that day by the murder of five policemen at a Dallas Black Lives Matter march. Ten days after Obama’s speech, three more cops were murdered in Baton Rouge.

Obama said:

“According to various studies—not just one, but a wide range of studies that have been carried out over a number of years—African-Americans are 30 percent more likely than whites to be pulled over.”

Amusingly, Obama brought up traffic stops first because he, personally, earned numerous speeding tickets racing from Chicago to Springfield and back while juggling jobs as a law school lecturer and a state legislator. Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer David J. Garrow’s exhaustive 2017 biography Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama notes Obama’s paranoia that the cops were out to get him because he’s black:

[One] reporter asked about his racial profiling bill and he explained that, “you will be hard pressed to find a black or Hispanic family who does not have at least one member who feels they’ve been stopped because of their race.” The reporter added that Obama “said he has been stopped many times for an apparent traffic violation.”

Garrow reports:

Soon after that, Barack had painful occasion to consider “driving while black” when he was pulled over and given a $75 ticket for going 62 in a 45 mph zone, yet as scheduler Cynthia Miller knew, “Barack does drive fast.”

Read the whole thing there.

 
Hide 318 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. “You will be hard pressed to find a black or Hispanic family who does not have at least one member who feels they’ve been stopped because of their race.”

    Ironically, and yet literally, something we can probably all agree upon. The man truly was a master politician.

    • Replies: @Bigdicknick
  2. The three I’s … I wish I could think of a fourth to describe what they want from us.

    • Replies: @bomag
  3. Beliavsky says:

    Obnma is not president any more. Does Steve think Trump’s race trolling (Mexican rapists, “rat-infestd”, “go back to their own countries”, “fire the SOBs” (referring to black, protesting NFL players) ought to be scaled back? I wish Sailer would show some intellectual honesty and occasionally criticize a president he supports, when the circumstances merit it.

  4. It’s basically a blood libel for a president to tell blacks that Numbers prove that their problems are caused by racist whites. Not surprisingly, just hours after Obama’s speech, a black man shot fourteen cops in Dallas.

    Yes, it is a blood libel, and it needs to be called out as such, even though the hour is late. It’s also a bald-faced lie, the kind Barack knew he could get away with. A compliant media can work miracles.

    Nor is it surprising that the total number of homicides in the U.S. shot up after Black Lives Matter, the Obama administration, and the prestige press decided in August 2014 that what was ailing the black community was too much law and order.

    A surprising number of blacks also feel this way, and I say they should have what they want. Their own neighborhoods, free of whites and white privilege, and exactly as much policing as they care to do themselves. It’s what they want, and what they deserve.

    • Agree: 95Theses
    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @europeasant
  5. Ohio’s affirmative action list was expanded to include (dot) Indians by George Voinovich, a Republican.
    Also, let’s not forget the “Mass Immigration Will Prevent Another Holocaust” idiocy that some still apparently believe.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Jake
  6. @Beliavsky

    Well, none of the people bitching about America Is A White Supremacist Country seem to want to move to the 2 countries where white supremacists have been removed from power, Zimbabwe and South Africa. They must be racist, or something.

  7. @Beliavsky

    Steve Sailer may have many faults, but a lack of intellectual honesty will never be among them. And to your more specific point, he has criticized President Trump on numerous occasions, as have most of us here.

    FWIW, I personally believe Trump is something of a horror show, and yet still the best choice this country had in 2016. The miracle is that enough of the country saw this too.

    Granted, Bernie Sanders showed a similar potential to be disruptive, though he couldn’t manage any consistency on the National Question. (He also failed to vanquish the Clinton Machine.) Trump makes all manner of rude noises yet accomplishes little to none of his own program. Your call.

    • Agree: Alfa158
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @anonymous
  8. El Dato says:

    Obama says:

    “you will be hard pressed to find a black or Hispanic family who does not have at least one member who feels they’ve been stopped because of their race.”

    Is this even true for Hispanics?

    • Replies: @Forbes
    , @AndrewR
    , @ben tillman
  9. After all, it’s not at all reasonable why white guilt over mistreatment of African-Americans in the increasingly receding past is so often used these days to justify throwing open the borders to foreigners.

    (my italics, DK)

    From wikipedia:

    “Requiem for a Nun is the source of one of Faulkner’s best-known lines, “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”

    This line is often paraphrased, as it was by then-Senator Barack Obama in his speech A More Perfect Union.”

    Of course, such US-references are all Biblically tinged – 2. Mose 34:7

    “Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.”

    “Tell me something that is not historical.” – A hard-nosed repudiation of (at least) historicism by HM Enzensberger in his masterly collection of poems titled (with a self-ironic Hegel-quote) The Fury of Diasppearance, Frankfurt, 1999.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  10. I just read your article. I appreciate the praise of Ben Franklin and your very good point about the wealth inherent in having a small population on a large piece of land. (Where is Bezos’ 300,000 acres, BTW?)

    On the last part of the article, I don’t agree at all. It’s not just that I don’t agree with having Affirmative Action for ANYONE, as it’s obviously unconstitutional and unfair as all hell. That’s not my point this time. I think you have your point backwards on support for AA for immigrants.

    Look, if it’s a matter of sharing the spoils (the money collected off of hardworking taxpayers), why wouldn’t the blacks resent immigration as those immigrants are more people that will divert part of the gravy train, the easy hiring, especially into government positions, the admissions to colleges, “disadvantaged” business loans and grants, etc? If immigration stopped, the blacks would get more of the spoils. You’re saying the blacks support immigration because of more D voters? That’s only the case for the black politicians, going along with all the D-coalition who, want more of those “fringe” people that you write about often.

    Blacks don’t always vote against their own interest on this issue – politician Barbara Jordan understood the problem of immigration for blacks. However, in general they vote for D’s because they’ll vote against the conservative white man just out of spite, stupidity, and “more free stuff” (your article concentrated on AA but ignored the general welfare system, which is much bigger in terms of money).

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @res
  11. Since I ended my previous comment on the Welfare State, let me elaborate. We know which groups of people use a more-than-proportionate share of the life-labor of working people (in the form of tax monies). White people are not one of these groups, let me put it that way.

    It’s a zero-sum game, and you’d think black people would resent that some immigrants from certain Asian countries collect all the benefits they can even as they make good money under the table. Granted, I don’t know which is worse, being lazy and collecting the tax money from those who work hard, or working hard and STILL collecting tax money from other people who work hard.

    I don’t think they think through all that when they vote. It’s whoever’s the black guy first, and the guy doling out the most money second, for a big majority of them.

  12. Now, on the lighter side, on this driving while black business. I think it’s mostly about speed, but I’ve got my own beef about being pulled over time after time due to my driving a muscle car. I can drive 80 mph for hours in an old partly-rusted pick-up and never get pulled. In the day, I’d be in court for local violations every summer it seemed, and could not go across the country without getting pulled over somewhere (I got better at dealing with the cops, something I learned in traffic school, so it didn’t always cost me.)

    One time, I was so pissed after having no points for the first time in a decade, as I got pulled over on a country road, back when the limit was still 55 mph off the interstates. “I was NOT doing 67, I was at 62!”. I told the black state trooper angrily, with my rebel flag plate on the front bumper, BTW. Haha, so what’s the difference, it was still speeding, one might say, but I was just pissed. The guy was extremely professional. He told me that possible my speedometer was in error and gave me a warning rather than a ticket. I got on the interstate 50 miles later, and checked my speedometer/odometer with mile markers. The guy was right! It was off by a steady 8%, reading low.

    Maybe Øb☭ma should have used the taxpayer-funded vehicle WITHOUT the tinted windows and low-profile tires, and bright purple paint job. … just sayin’ ….

  13. This guy ignores Kamala, though she’s clearly a threat, and tries to shred Warren but in the process convinces me that Warren could win.

    His protests about how rational and reasonable the electorate is (much less Dem primary voters) remain unpersuasive. If anything, the cohort which will vote for whomever promises the most free stuff is achieving critical mass. It’s what they came to America for, after all.

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/democrats-2020-suggestion-panic-michael-goodwin

    His warnings to the Dems about how lefties in the past (McGovern even!) led to epic defeats do convince me, though. They convince me that he’s living in the distant past.

    They say the past is another country, well what we have right now is a different country. And it’s becoming more “different” with each passing day.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  14. Nick Diaz says:

    “Why share your rightful property with newcomers? For example, Jeff Bezos owns both the pro-immigration Washington Post and over 300,000 acres of very private property in the U.S.
    Which advice should you trust more? What Bezos’ editorial page tells you that you ought to vote for or what Bezos chooses for himself?”

    What kind of idiotic drivel is this? Jeff Bezos *payed for the land that he has* . Do you think that just being born a U.S citizen automatically gives you 300,000 acres of land? Jeff Bezos has exactly the same rights as everyone. He is not legally privileged compared to the average U.S citizen at all. He is a billionaire because he had a brilliant idea and showed tremendous resourcefullness and talent in making his idea successful. So your aomparison is absurd here. You are comparing citizenship right to owning property via a commerical/economic transaction. Apples and oranges.

    “The wisest man in American history, Benjamin Franklin, pointed out in 1754 that Americans enjoyed the highest standard of living in the world,”

    America did not have the highest standard of living in the World in the late 18th century. America was always a relatively rich country, but in the late 18th century it had a lower standard of living not only compared to Europe’s, but also even to Central American colonies. In fact, the foremost reason why America earned it’s independence fairly easily is because the English didn’t care that much about losing the North American colonies. Back then, mosf of the wealth coming from the Americas came from sugar, and the richest colonies were those of Central America.

    ” into the great heart of North America, the richest agricultural land ever discovered.”

    Except that it’s not. The Po River Valley in Italy is richer. The Loir Valley in France is also richer. The southern Chinese provinces of Hunan, Jiangxi and Fujian are richer – feeds literally a billion people with an area slightly larger than Texas. If we are talking agricultural lands that have been doscovered, the Bacia del Plata in Argentina is richer than any land in America. So is the region in Brazil that goes from Goiás to Paraná in the south.

    You, of course, completely omitted that the same area you mentioned has one of the most horrible climates on Planet Earth, with wet and humid summers where the temperature goes up to 104 F, then to drop to blistering -22 F during winter time. Face it: America’s topography and climates sucks. America has like 3% of it’s territory in good weather: the San Francisco Bay in California, and the northern part of Florida(southern Florida is scorching hot year-round), and small patches of good weather in Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina(most parts of these states still have bad weather with very hot summers . Winters are not too bad, almost as mild as western Europe, although for the most part sitll colder.

    But of course, you say these things because of your jingoistic nonsese: to you, America is the greatest country ever at everything, and you have to mention how America compared favorably to other countries at everything every time you make a post. It’s pathetic.

    And regarding immigeation, for the last time, you benefit daily from immigration. Your standafd of living is at least twice as high as it would be otherwise without immigrants,. You have shit for brains, which is why you don’t understand the reason why you pay so little for the food you eat, the television sets and cars you buy, is because of mass immigration and fre trade. Your endless Catilinarians against immigration are funny since none of y0u reading this – and I know that you reading – would be willing to pay a dime more for the goods and services you purchase to support the cause of limiting immigration. Because the first thing that would happen is that everything would cost more. Much more. Talk is cheap. If you truly believe the shit you say, then the next time you see a native-born American worker willingly give him a pay raise by tipping him with the salary that you assume that restricting immigration would result for native-born American workers.

    I could explain in precise detail why you dumbos don’t know shit for squat, and explain to you why mass immigration and free trade are responsible for the comfortable lives you live. Because doing so would require you to understand concepts such as division of labor, maximization of utility and comparative advantage, and these concepts are way above you doofuses’ ability to comprehend. So just trust me that you need and want immigrants.

    Steve Sailer, you are also a hypocrite of colossal proportions. You go on and one about how America is great because it has so much land and open spaces, and that because of that immigration should be restricted, yada yada. Then, you follow your anti-immigration rant with an article on affordable family formation, on how to get Americans to have more kids. Oh wait, I thought you argued that demographic growth is a bad thing? Ah, I get it. It’s not that you don’t want more people…you just want your kind of people: white conservatives. Hypocrite.

    We need another 800 million immigrants just to keep the economy going, and you doofuses are compalining about the measly 1-2 million a year that America receives. Given demographic trends, America will need to add another 800 million to 2.5 billion immigrants over the next 10-20 to maintain stable GDP growth. Now, 2,5 billion might not be practical due to the fact that you need to run background checks for criminal activities on the applicants, etc, but America receiving 1 billion immigrants over the next decade is not unreasonable.

  15. eah says:

    The BLM Era increases in murder were concentrated exactly where BLM won its biggest victories over law and order, such as in Baltimore:

    2013: 235 homicides
    2014: 211
    2015: 344 (Freddie Gray riot 4/27/15)
    2016: 318
    2017: 343

    Nationally, homicides shot up by a historic 24.7 percent between 2014 and 2016:

    2013: 12,253 homicides
    2014: 12,270
    2015: 13,750
    2016: 15,296
    2017: 15,129

    Speaking of before/after (not to mention invading/inviting/imploding), someone compared the BKA (Bundeskriminalamt) data from 2014 (before) and 2018 (after ‘Merkel’s Boner’): “Mord/Todschlag” = homicide; “Sexuelle Übergriffe” = sex crimes; “Körperverletzung etc” = assault/battery.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
  16. eah says:

    The 4,506 incremental deaths from excess murders in Obama’s last two years during his War on Racism over 2014’s number were quite comparable to the 4,423 American fatalities in George W. Bush’s similarly misbegotten Iraq War.

    Only the numbers are comparable, ie not the “who, whom” part:

    The Color Of Combat: The Minority-Disproportion Myth

  17. George Soros just spent $500,000 to elect a 37 year old SPLC attorney as the District Attorney in Jackson, Mississippi.

    This is part of a very sinister strategy being enacted nationwide.

    • Replies: @El Dato
  18. El Dato says:
    @Nick Diaz

    We need another 800 million immigrants just to keep the economy going

    You destroyed your good piece with this argument. Evidently, the Federal Reserve can provide all the money to keep the economy going w/o any immigration at all.

    • Replies: @Alfa158
    , @CJC
  19. TTSSYF says:
    @HammerJack

    Yes, unfortunately, I share your skepticism about the rationality of the majority of the electorate. There have been a series of events since the 1990s that have caused me, little by little, to lose hope. One was the O.J. Simpson verdict, when the jurors took all of two hours to return the finding of non-guilty and blacks around the country hooted and hollered as though it were a great victory, never seeing how stupid they looked. I gave up on the majority of black Americans after that. Another was the re-election of Obama. While, since 2012, I have come to strongly dislike Romney, at the time, I was a strong supporter of his and worked regularly at his campaign headquarters, making telephone calls and canvassing neighborhoods. He was a moderate Republican (no scary Barry Goldwater-conservative) and a white guy, and the fact that so many white people did not support him or vote for him but instead voted to put the feckless, divisive, shallow black dude back in office made it clear to me that the country was never going to reverse the damage that began in earnest in the mid-1960s. Instead, we’ve merely doubled-down on stupid. Trump provided a brief flash of hope, and he’s done some good things (e.g., his judicial appointments, de-regulation), but he’s been disappointing in many other ways. I cut him some slack because of the forces allied against him from the moment he first declared his candidacy through the dud of a climax of Mueller’s testimony (although we don’t hear much about “Russia”, “collusion”, or even “Impeach foty-fi” lately).

    The time for a conversation with the Left is over. Short of out-right civil war, it’s time to quit honoring any Lefty you know with any serious conversation about the state of affairs and go Galt to the extent possible.

  20. TTSSYF says:
    @Nick Diaz

    Thank you for submitting Exhibit A, by which you’ve provided clear evidence of the lowered average IQ of the American populace and the concomitant loss of rationality and general decency/good citizenry.

  21. laughing.

    Ohhh no. Not another slip and slide to pedal the Fergusan effect. Now clearly in Chicago as has been the case throughout US history before the Fergason Effect was postulated, crime increased in areas once it was understood that the police either wouldn’t go those areas.

    Most of the time, they just chose to ignore certain communities as opposed to having any real fear of the community itself. I do think that in Chicago there may be some genuine fear by the police as there may be in some locations. But a national fear of doing their jobs cause for increased crime unsupported.

    Laugh the police union are very astute and have played the effect for all it s worth. Aha steps in the “law and order” president to save the day. Let’s start by local people ratting out who they think the next local shooter will be.

    Ohh brother.

    • Replies: @El Dato
  22. El Dato says:
    @James Braxton

    The business case for blacks-only “cheap & cheerful, cash & carry” gun shops is getting better.

  23. eah says:

    OT

    A German, err, meat magnate (s.g. “Wurst-Fürst”, bürgerlich Clemens Tönnies) is in trouble due to something he said related to ‘the world’s most important graph’:

    Der Wurst-Fürst und die Kinder in Afrika

    Der Fleisch-Unternehmer Clemens Tönnies, … hat beim Tag des Handwerks in Paderborn im Zusammenhang mit der Klimawandel-Diskussion gesagt, man solle lieber zwanzig Kraftwerke in Afrika finanzieren, statt in Deutschland höhere Steuern auf CO2 einzuführen. „Dann würden die Afrikaner aufhören, Bäume zu fällen, und“ – Achtung, jetzt kommt’s – „sie hören auf, wenn es dunkel ist, Kinder zu produzieren.“

    He said instead of a CO2 tax in Germany, it would be better to build 20 power plants in Africa — this way the Africans would stop chopping down trees, and, since they would have enough electricity to light their homes, they would go to bed later and thus have fewer kids.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    , @El Dato
  24. Tiny Duck says:

    You people of Color all agree that white men are fragile and cannot do anything without unfair advantages

  25. Anonymous[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @Redneck farmer

    Also, let’s not forget the “Mass Immigration Will Prevent Another Holocaust” idiocy that some still apparently believe.

    What group is most likely to commit another Holocaust?

    Whites are. For Whites have committed one in the past. They are also guilty of committing pogroms and expulsions against Jews, as well as pressuring them to integrate.

    Therefore, the belief that destroying Whites will prevent another Holocaust is well-founded.

  26. Dtbb says:

    Great article. You make things sound so simple and straightforward. Is it just too late? Are our leaders just too cowardly?

  27. Anonymous[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dieter Kief

    “Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.”

    What does this even mean?

  28. Anonymous[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Look, if it’s a matter of sharing the spoils (the money collected off of hardworking taxpayers), why wouldn’t the blacks resent immigration as those immigrants are more people that will divert part of the gravy train, the easy hiring, especially into government positions, the admissions to colleges, “disadvantaged” business loans and grants, etc?

    It’s all about priorities. Immigration destroys the White man, whom blacks view as an existential threat and as a rival to obtaining White women. (See Hollywood movies portraying lynchings, KKK, etc.)

    • Replies: @Travis
  29. bomag says:
    @Beliavsky

    Well, Obama was president, and still casts a pretty long shadow.

    What you call race trolling by Trump is mostly blunt truth.

    Your comment highlights that we have been trained to be sensitive to not hurting the feelings of certain racial groups, while anything can be said about Whites with no consequence.

  30. Anonymous[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @TTSSYF

    Instead, we’ve merely doubled-down on stupid. Trump provided a brief flash of hope, and he’s done some good things (e.g., his judicial appointments, de-regulation)

    What specifically has he done concerning de-regulation that is good?

    • Agree: Dissident
    • Replies: @FPD72
  31. Arclight says:

    In a world in which the goal of our politicians was to secure the highest standard of living and cultural harmony for the American people, we most certainly would not have permitted tens of millions of low skill/low education immigrants to settle here.

    But the goal of the left for at least half a century has been the destruction of the majority’s cultural and political power, so the more clients for the welfare state that can be termed ‘of color’ the better, and the dupes of the GOP have gone along with it to please the Chamber of Commerce.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  32. Hunsdon says:

    Slightly OT but very IStevey: NPR reported yesterday on the birth dearth. They did mention immigration . . . but as a solution!

    https://www.npr.org/2019/08/06/747571497/less-sex-fewer-babies-blame-the-internet-and-career-priorities

  33. Brutusale says:

    “you will be hard pressed to find a black or Hispanic family who does not have at least one member who feels they’ve been stopped because of their race.” The reporter added that Obama “said he has been stopped many times for an apparent traffic violation.”

    “You will be hard-pressed to find a black or Hispanic family who does not have at least one member who has been stopped for driving a car that violates the state’s motor vehicle standards.”

    FIFY

  34. bomag says:
    @The Alarmist

    “In remembrance of.”

    Or non-remembrance of.

  35. @TTSSYF

    (although we don’t hear much about “Russia”, “collusion”, or even “Impeach foty-fi” lately)

    If you listen to the Democratic primary candidates you’ll still hear this stuff. Both Harris and Booker claim that Trump committed ten counts of obstruction of justice.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  36. anonymous[252] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr McKenna

    The problem is that their crime spills over their borders. You see it in Chicago where carjackings and muggings occur all over the city.

  37. mmack says:
    @Anonymous

    Plain English: “The sins of the fathers are visited upon the sons”

    The whole verse is in Exodus, and is God addressing the Israelites: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/Exodus/20/5

  38. Anonymous[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @Arclight

    In a world in which the goal of our politicians was to secure the highest standard of living and cultural harmony for the American people, we most certainly would not have permitted tens of millions of low skill/low education immigrants to settle here.

    Creation of a serf class allows non-serfs to live better.

  39. Jake says:

    If America today were run by people with sound common sense and a decent moral base, then the Sailer conclusion would have been adopted a very long time ago. But it aint happening because the Elites of the Yank Empire have common sense only when it comes to their own greed, which means that they also are collectively the antithesis of a group possessing a decent moral base.

    And that is not new for the WASP Empire. The only difference is lack of ‘frontier’ land to allow its own ‘poor white trash’ to settle and civilize so that in a couple or three generations the WASP Elites can have their kin steal it back from the undeserving ‘poor white trash.’

    That is the process of expansion of the original WASP Elites across the British Isles: steal lands from non-WASPs, use the poor you control to tame that ‘frontier,’ and then eventually manage national economy so that the children of the very people the WASP Elites used to steal more land to own and control fare forced to emigrate in order not to starve. Then the process is allowed to play out elsewhere in the world.

    The problem with that game came when the frontiers ended globally. Then, either the WASP Elites would end their class’s perpetual abuse of whatever ‘poor white trash’ it found itself sidled with, or it would redirect that pattern. The later choice was a given, because from the time the original WASP Elite was enriched nearly unbelievably at the expense of the Church and the masses of poor who received ‘welfare’ from the Church, its massive wealth had been built upon exploitation of the ‘poor white trash’ it ruled.

    In effect, the WASP Elite system said to the poorest of the English staring in the Tudor Age: The evil foreign Church no longer can bribe you with riches it stole from our Kingdom, and that means you are getting poorer. You can remedy that by going to Ireland to take the true English faith as well as land there that is opening as we dispossess Irish Catholic clans. James Stuart made the same pitch to the Scottish lowland poor as soon as he was on the English throne. And then it quickly became the pitch to emigrate the British Isles totally: if you resent being poor in Britain, head to the frontier and become your own man.

    And once the emigrant white trash of the British Isles tamed the frontier, who managed to remain in charge and even richer than before? The WASP Elites.

    And whom did the WASP Elites blame for whatever went wrong with that process, whatever seemed a bit brutal or unnecessary or greedy? The ‘poor white trash.’

    And now all that is much worse, because what was inherent in the formation of the WASP Elite has been made manifest: WASP Empire is Anglo-Zionist Empire. Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy, and unless it is rejected, a Judaizing heresy always produces pro-Jewish culture. Jewish bankers have been indispensable to the WASP Elites since Oliver Cromwell. And those Jewish bankers did not invest in the Brit WASP Empire and then the American WASP Empire to be nice guys, nor just to make a fair profit.

    Those Jews are defined by being anti-Christ and anti-Christendom, and they know that Christendom was built and maintained, and culturally rich almost beyond measure, by white people. And that means that those Jews will back a white Elite only as that white Elite hates and despises and harms the majority of whites it rules.

    It is a spiritual war, and you cannot win it without fighting it as a spiritual war that stresses that all culture produced by heresy is itself perverse and pregnant with horrors that will prove even worse.

    You cannot solve the Jewish problem without also solving the WASP problem. And the Jewish problem means that the Anglo-Zionist Elites prefer the vast majority of whites to be serfs in all but legal signification.

    • Replies: @Dissident
    , @Lot
  40. @TTSSYF

    Short of out-right civil war, it’s time to quit honoring any Lefty you know with any serious conversation about the state of affairs and go Galt to the extent possible.

    I agree with this, mostly because I don’t know a Leftist who has any interest in a serious discussion of issues or is capable of participating in one. I have one intelligent Leftist friend whom I’ve known from childhood and I find it pointless to discuss politics with him, though we were able to years ago. For example, he’s not aware of the extent of the corruption of the Clintons; he’s never heard anything about it. If I were to explain the nature of the Russia-collusion hoax, he would think I was making it up, as it’s not covered in the New York Times. Those of the Right and those on the Left live in different worlds today.

    • Agree: Old Prude
    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    , @Lurker
  41. bomag says:
    @Anonymous

    LOL

    Good luck with that attitude.

    When Whites go, so do Jews. No one else will have them.

  42. Jake says:
    @Redneck farmer

    “Also, let’s not forget the “Mass Immigration Will Prevent Another Holocaust” idiocy that some still apparently believe.”

    Because nothing could make certain that Jews living in America and Europe could be safe forever than from wild violence than to import tens of millions of Mohammedans.

    • Replies: @Lot
  43. It’s ironic that this piece at Takimag asks Americans to update their old black & white view of race in America but you still call Whites “whites” and Blacks “blacks” while every other group gets recognised with a capital letter.

    I’m being pedantic about this for good reason. One can’t say “we need to redraw our mental map of the political landscape but still label ourselves as if nothing has changed because Strunk & White’s Elements of Style told me so. My hands are tied, I’m afraid”.

    They say that after the Civil War, people began to write “the United States is” rather than “the United States are“. Maybe you guys will need a second civil war to get those capital letters on “black” and “white”, to go along with “Latinos”, “Indians”, “Hawaiians”, “Vermonters”, “Hmong”, “Somali” and every other damned group.

  44. @Anonymous

    The most efficiently conducted genocide in recent decades was conducted by Africans in Rwanda in 1994. In the space of three months, 937,000 Rwandans were slaughtered by their countrymen, mostly by machete. Within the time frame, the death rate is five times that of the Holocaust.

    As progressives assume that blacks lack agency, blame for this is laid on the West for not intervening.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @El Dato
  45. Walsh2 says:

    Good piece of writing. In the body, the terms “white racism,” “white supremacy,” and white nationalism” were referenced not as interchangeable but terms that unique unto themselves. And, in fact, they are unique and designed and used as such. My thoughts are that folks realized that racism/racist has been over used to the point that it’s lost it’s bite and white supremacy, as understood by most, only attaches to a fringe population.

    The term “white nationalism,” on the other hand allows those that use it to paint with a broader brush and thus demonize or other a larger segment of the population.

    If one where to put the term “white nationalism” through the NYT or other such word search to determine the frequency of its use over time my guess is that it’d be a hockey stick graph with the rise starting in or around 2014, spiking in 2016, and continuing its rise thereafter.

    The development of this term and the rise in its use is, as they say, not a lucky accident.

    • Agree: The Anti-Gnostic
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @WowJustWow
  46. @Nick Diaz

    The scroll wheel on my mouse gets a workout.

    • LOL: jim jones
  47. TWS says:
    @Beliavsky

    Well, it doesn’t merit it so take a hike. I’m pretty sure by your spelling and grammar you have to go back.

  48. anonymous[252] • Disclaimer says:
    @Nick Diaz

    It’s clear you need to go back.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  49. countenance says: • Website

    If our sector is going to endorse keeping affirmative action, it should come with adding low status and non-connected whites as a beneficiary category.

  50. @Anonymous

    “Therefore, the belief that destroying Whites will prevent another Holocaust is well-founded.”

    Except of course that the attempt to do so is the very thing most likely to provoke the action you wish to avoid. No wonder history keeps repeating.

  51. Craig says:

    Looks like Steve hit a nerve with this article so it’s probably right on the mark. Keep up the good work!

  52. mmack says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Getting pinched doing 62 in a 45 MPH zone tells me Odumbo was on a road in Illinois that was:
    A) A major surface road running through multiple suburban towns
    B) A surface road entering or exiting a city (most cities I drove around in Illinois drop the speed limit to under 35, and most down to 25 if there’s a major downtown area)
    C) A rural road people use to bypass congested main surface roads

    I don’t know the time of day or night he got pinched by Officer Friendly, but almost 20 MPH over is going to be noticed by non-cops (“Look at that IDIOT!”) as the speeder blows past you. And if Odumbo thought he was Mario Andretti, AJ Foyt, or Richard Petty and was weaving in and out of traffic, and tailgating or cutting people off to get ahead of them, I don’t have any sympathy for him. Or any white dude or gal that does that either. People playing Ricky Racer on the highways and surface roads bothers me more than someone passing me on the highway on the left @85 while I’m in the center lane doing 75. People doing 60 in a 70 mph zone in the center, and not the right lane bother me for a whole ‘nother reason.

    Look, if you drive so fast it’s OBVIOUS you’re speeding as you blow past the bulk of traffic (100 in a 70), or zip in and out of the traffic flow, the cops are going to light up the flashers and pull you over, no matter what color you are.

    Oh, and your pickup hypothesis: My Mrs. got pinched doing 55 in a 40 in my lil’ ol’ Chevrolet S-10 a few years back. She was hauling ass on a rural road people in our suburb used to bypass a “stoplight every other block” main drag, and a copper was hiding behind a bend in the road with his radar gun. Ah well. The worst part was I had to drive the truck down the same road the same day. You bet I stayed right at the speed limit.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  53. @Nick Diaz

    Doesn’t Mexico need to grow their economy more? Send them there.

    Oh, that’s right. Mexico is sending the Magic Millions north to go be somebody else’s problem.

  54. @Achmed E. Newman

    Now, on the lighter side, on this driving while black business. I think it’s mostly about speed, but I’ve got my own beef about being pulled over time after time due to my driving a muscle car

    My dad was a cop, and his insight was that it is a number of things, like speeding and failure to stop fully at a stop sign, but a failure to signal turns or lane changes was right up there; if you pay attention in traffic, you’ll notice that black drivers are big offenders on all of these, particularly the failure to signal.

  55. @countenance

    I’ll take it a step farther: UBI.

    Something, anything to paper over the reality that we’re in a warming ethnic spoils fight.

  56. @countenance

    That would be dismissed as both anti-Semitic and socialist.

  57. @eah

    I’m sure the BKA stats are merely a Scheinkorrelation.

  58. @eah

    Wurst-Fürst… klasse! How about der Fürst von Würste?

    Did he specify nuke-plants so they wouldn’t further hurt die Umwelt, or is the secret plan to open more markets for Germany’s Braunkohle?

  59. INVITE THE WORLD

    INVADE THE WORLD

    IN HOCK TO THE WORLD

    INDOCTRINATE THE CITIZENS OF THE USA

    INTERROGATE THE CITIZENS OF THE USA

    Tweet from 2015:

  60. Steve Sailer came up with this one as far back as 2008:

    INVADE THE WORLD

    INVITE THE WORLD

    IN HOCK TO THE WORLD

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/invade-world-invite-world-in-hock-to/

    Tweet from 2014:

  61. TWS says:
    @Nick Diaz

    You had me going for a minute. Then I checked the name and you got to the 800 million bit. Funny as hell.

  62. jim jones says:
    @Nick Diaz

    the foremost reason why America earned it’s independence fairly easily is because the English didn’t care that much about losing the North American colonies.

    The only man who cared about America was George III because, as we all know, he was completely insane:

  63. Anon[106] • Disclaimer says:
    @Nick Diaz

    Jeff Bezos has exactly the same rights as everyone. He is not legally privileged compared to the average U.S citizen at all.

    As a Jew, he is politically privileged. Which also means that he has a natural foreign allegiance as well as benefits from international nepotism. As a Jew, he’s also innately dangerous given his religion’s belief (as can be found in the Jewish texts) that Jews are to genocide all non Jews, destroy the West, and inherit the world.

    [MORE]

    America did not have the highest standard of living in the World in the late 18th century.

    I notice your lack of data.

    In fact, the foremost reason why America earned it’s independence fairly easily is because the English didn’t care that much about losing the North American colonies.

    Source? You write like a sixth grade child who has not yet learned that assertions need to be cited.

    ” into the great heart of North America, the richest agricultural land ever discovered.”

    Except that it’s not. The Po River Valley in Italy is richer. The Loir Valley in France is also richer. The southern Chinese provinces of Hunan, Jiangxi and Fujian are richer – feeds literally a billion people with an area slightly larger than Texas. If we are talking agricultural lands that have been doscovered, the Bacia del Plata in Argentina is richer than any land in America. So is the region in Brazil that goes from Goiás to Paraná in the south.

    “Richer” how? And adjusted for size? Again, your mind lacks the penchant for high school level specifics.

    You, of course, completely omitted that the same area you mentioned has one of the most horrible climates on Planet Earth, with wet and humid summers where the temperature goes up to 104 F, then to drop to blistering -22 F during winter time.

    What specific area? Reading your juvenile rant is exhausting.

    America has like 3% of it’s territory in good weather: the San Francisco Bay in California, and the northern part of Florida(southern Florida is scorching hot year-round),

    That’s not a successful point. You are mostly referencing the Mediterranean climate as “good weather”, which is only found in the Mediterranean, California, and Chile. Moreover, only niggers like yourself think that a lack of winter means “good weather”. That’s why you have a permanent hominid tan and your people are largely low IQ, and why New England is in a “bad weather” area according to you.

    and small patches of good weather in Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina(most parts of these states still have bad weather with very hot summers . Winters are not too bad, almost as mild as western Europe, although for the most part sitll colder.

    As mild as Western Europe? Have you been to Western Europe in the winter, nog? Apparently not. Plenty of other states have similar weather to the three states that you mention. Consider ceasing geographic lectures until you know something about geography.

    But of course, you say these things because of your jingoistic nonsese:

    Read: “we need to be near you and your national resources, throughout the world, for our prosperity”.

    to you, America is the greatest country ever at everything, and you have to mention how America compared favorably to other countries at everything every time you make a post. It’s pathetic.

    Cry more.

    And regarding immigeation, for the last time, you benefit daily from immigration.

    Losses as a result of immigration are far more relevant and serious than any supposed material gain. The squeeze isn’t worth the supposed juice in terms of culture, crime, and race.

    Your standafd of living is at least twice as high as it would be otherwise without immigrants,.

    See above. Also, note that you lack data for your attempted point. Want to see the crime data, or perhaps the data that shows how many Whites have been dispossessed from towns like El Paso?

    I know that your self interest makes it difficult for this to penetrate through that thick Indian skull of yours, but the truth is that its not worth it for us and it will never be so.

    You have shit for brains, which is why you don’t understand the reason why you pay so little for the food you eat, the television sets and cars you buy, is because of mass immigration and fre trade.

    We understand that you are angry that we, as a broad group, want nothing to do with your group. Its painful when you treat a group as Gods, which you can not be separated from, and that group rejects you.

    We realize that Jews and their minority charges like to tell us that things will be cheap, or the foreign food “delicious”, as justification for our dispossession. In fact, this buy-out strategy for Jewish enemies is elucidated in their Azazel scapegoat ritual and myth where they bribe our god with a goat as a bargain for our destruction.

    We realize that you are frustrated when that buy-out strategy fails, over-riding the limited emotional control your hominid genetics influenced smaller frontal cortex. However, your buy out, no matter what it is, is not worth our land and existence.

    Your endless Catilinarians against immigration are funny since none of y0u reading this – and I know that you reading – would be willing to pay a dime more for the goods and services you purchase to support the cause of limiting immigration.

    Then you don’t know us. We’d be willing to do that and almost infinitely more. We understand if you want to tell yourself lies to allow yourself to sleep at night.

    Because the first thing that would happen is that everything would cost more. Much more. Talk is cheap. If you truly believe the shit you say, then the next time you see a native-born American worker willingly give him a pay raise by tipping him with the salary that you assume that restricting immigration would result for native-born American workers.

    Your proposal is typical of Ameri-Indian intelligence.

    I could explain in precise detail why you dumbos don’t know shit for squat,

    At least you’re a funny monkey.

    and explain to you why mass immigration and free trade are responsible for the comfortable lives you live. Because doing so would require you to understand concepts such as division of labor, maximization of utility and comparative advantage, and these concepts are way above you doofuses’ ability to comprehend. So just trust me that you need and want immigrants.

    Nope, we’re good. Bring it on. There is no way to know until that happens. Let’s test it out.

    But we’ll wait for you to negate that offer and tell us that we couldn’t be without you, again. Because that’s your only actual recourse. Your arguments, now, being typical of every angry-monkey NAM, who always tries to somehow sell this nation’s majority on the minority by angrily insulting it. Whether its Negros, Jews, or Ameri-Indians, its always the same impudent and always failed tactic.

    Trust me, we can do without you in the same way that Europe did without you for most of its existence. As evidenced by its relative racial hygiene up until the prior century.

    I’ll now await your protest and excuses that are essentially pleas for us to accept you everywhere that we are.

    Steve Sailer, you are also a hypocrite of colossal proportions. You go on and one about how America is great because it has so much land and open spaces, and that because of that immigration should be restricted, yada yada. Then, you follow your anti-immigration rant with an article on affordable family formation, on how to get Americans to have more kids.

    That’s not hypocrisy. He doesn’t want you. He doesn’t want this nation to turn into Central / South America. Which is an honest, rational desire.

    Oh wait, I thought you argued that demographic growth is a bad thing? Ah, I get it. It’s not that you don’t want more people…you just want your kind of people: white conservatives. Hypocrite.

    That is correct. Everyone wants their own nation, except for those that feel that they need to be in proximity to White people for their prosperity. Which means that Whites are to transfer their resources to that group. Where is the hypocrisy? You are the hypocrite as you can’t admit your desire for proximity to and dependence on our group, if not outright complete (racially interested) replacement.

    We need another 800 million immigrants just to keep the economy going, and you doofuses are compalining about the measly 1-2 million a year that America receives.

    Nope, we’re good.

    Given demographic trends, America will need to add another 800 million to 2.5 billion immigrants over the next 10-20 to maintain stable GDP growth. Now, 2,5 billion might not be practical due to the fact that you need to run background checks for criminal activities on the applicants, etc,

    We’re not interested in stable GDP growth, insofar as it includes you.

    but America receiving 1 billion immigrants over the next decade is not unreasonable.

    “An insane number is not unreasonable”

    I thought that you knew geography? Apparently not.

    You won’t be getting anywhere near that. You’ll be lucky if you all aren’t engaged in a civil war within the next three decades. Good luck with driving us toward that, at a faster pace, with your immigration extremism.

    In fact, I encourage you to post your desire for one billion immigrants everywhere possible.

  64. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @Harry Baldwin

    The most efficiently conducted genocide in recent decades was conducted by Africans in Rwanda in 1994. In the space of three months, 937,000 Rwandans were slaughtered by their countrymen, mostly by machete. Within the time frame, the death rate is five times that of the Holocaust.

    The killing there was of Rwandans, not Jews.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  65. Dan Smith says:

    The “diversity is wonderful” trope loosed on the USA over the past couple of decades deserves careful analysis. Are people really happier in a thoroughly mixed society? Take urban neighborhoods, for example. I ran in the New York City Marathon in 1988. One of the charms of the race, I learned, was to pass through the variety of ethnic neighborhoods in Brooklyn and observe the differences. It was true! Running along the route, I became aware of my surroundings. Pure Puerto Rican for awhile, then Hasidic, the African-American, and so forth. Thirty years later I am struck by the obvious drive among people to associate with kinship groups. The idea that a neighborhood is going to have a magical proportion of racial groups and be functional is open to debate. Not all ghettos are created by sinister bankers drawing red lines around sections of a city. There is a lot created by the choices of the people living there.

  66. Anglo-Saxon Expansionism and Jew anti-nationalism are combining to destroy the United States of America.

    The JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire is a clear and present threat to the safety, security and sovereignty of the United States of America.

    The JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire wants to completely and totally kill the United States of America and allow the American Empire to take over.

    The Federal Reserve Bank has rendered the 10th Amendment null and void and states are mere administrative units anyway, so the JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire says screw it, let’s wipe those states the Hell out!

    Tweets from 2015:

  67. istevefan says:

    So that if you add it all up, the African-American and Hispanic population, who make up only 30 percent of the general population, make up more than half of the incarcerated population.

    Only 30%?

    It’s as though that is some measly figure. What was once a combined 12% of the population of the richest nation on earth is now 2.5 times the amount it was fifty odd years ago. How many groups have managed to pull off something like that historically without having a strong armed force?

    To paraphrase the late Christopher Hitchens, almost all cities taken by barbarians were done so because someone in the city opened the gates. The 30% figure is proof that this happened to us.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  68. peterike says:

    OT: Troublesome Asian alert!!

    As always, with Chinese and money, hilarity ensues!

    Chinese tycoon Li Jianhua fights daughter over Canada real estate fortune in lawsuits depicting knife violence, fraud and corporate turmoil

    Please, let’s allow fifty million more of this “model minority” into our nation.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/money-wealth/article/3021721/chinese-tycoon-li-jianhua-fights-daughter-over-canada-real

    • LOL: Vinteuil
  69. Travis says:
    @Anonymous

    still very poor logic for Blacks to support immigration and amnesty.
    As the NY Times noted in 2001 when Bush attempted another amnesty for illegal aliens, granting amnesty to millions of aliens reduces wages for American workers, especially effected are those without a college degree, thus Blacks wages are lowered more than whites when we allow millions if immigrants into America. In addition to lower wages and lower welfare benefits, massive immigration results in higher housing costs, which hurts renters more than owners…thus Blacks again are the most negatively effected group.

    But the biggest negative effect on allowing 60 million to migrate into America is the loss of political power for Blacks. The 60 million immigrants and their children have permanently altered the demographic breakdown of the United States.

    If we had not allowed in 50 million Hispanics and 15 million Asians over the last 50 years, the Black Population would be 18% of our population, 50% higher than today. we can see the power of blacks has been reduced due to the 1986 amnesty and our immigration policies since then.

    population- 1930 — 1970 — 2010
    White pop – 110 M – 178 M – 195 M
    Black pop — 11 M — 22 M — 43 M

    we can see that while the Black population has doubled every 40 years, the white population has not doubled over the last 80 years. The ratio of whites to Blacks was 9-1 in 1930. it had fallen to 8-1 by 1970 and 5-1 in 2010. Soon we will have a ration of 4 whites per Black America. But admitting million of hispanics and Asians has reduced the impact of the growing Black population. Today many Blacks want every industry to include 12% Blacks because of their demographics. Without immigration Blacks would be closer to 20% of our population which is a dangerously high level.

    The main reason the Black population has grown twice as fast as the white population is the fertility rate of Black women has been consistently higher than white females. Another reason is that 9% of white women had a Non-white child over the last 40 years. Black females can only have Black children, since even if they mart with a white or Asian male, the child will be counted as Black. White women can only have a white child with a white husband. thus White fertility is misleading, since 10% of white women will have non-white children today, thus the actual white fertility rate is actually lower than the reported 1.7 and is closer to 1.6 if we exclude Black babies born to whites. The required white fertility rate needs to be 2.3 to maintain the white population , since 10% of births will be non-whites today. thus with a white fertility rate of 2.1 the number of whites will continue to decline. The Black fertility rate can fall to 1.7 and we will still observe an increase in the number of Black Children, since millions of white women are having Black babies. Black babies do not require a Black mother, any race can produce a Black baby with a Black father.

  70. @Anonymous

    I think you’ll find that few, if any, people around here believe in “the holocaust” lore we’ve all been told so your argument is going nowhere, son.

    Maybe try Breitbart? I don’t know.

  71. anon[423] • Disclaimer says:

    “Eliminate these incentives for promoting the antiwhite racial hatred of the kind that got all those cops in Dallas and Baton Rouge murdered and we’ll have healthier politics.”

    But how likely is that to occur? Historically, weak governing systems have very poor track records of successfully reforming themselves before they collapse, even if they know they are in trouble well in advance – Wiemar Germany, Czarist Russia, the Roman Empire … even the US itself at one point it time … etc. Most humans are typically short-sighted, ignorant of trends, and greedy (among other things). Frankly, humans have repeatedly demonstrated they prioritize perceived short-term gains and risks over long-terms ones, even if those long-term consequences are potentially existential in nature. The only recent exception was perhaps the Cold War, but that was largely due to the fact that both sides had an immediate potential loss, a huge one, in front of them for being short-sighted. Most Americans consider racial demographic discussions either immoral or esoteric. Feels > facts is how many humans think, unfortunately. Don’t expect America’s moronic Ruling Class to be any different.

    I guess where I differ with Steve is that I don’t believe reform is terribly likely at this point; we’ve passed the point of no return and now we are basically early 5th century Rome. Collapse of the reigning order is not yet upon us, but the astute can see it ahead. Social media and persistent achievement disparities (and crime and everything else) among racial groups will continue stoking envy among the POC, and they will lash out in response; Obama did, and his only provocation was receiving a well-deserved speeding ticket. That’s why non-whites want reparations and mass immigration – to rub the negative consequences of these polices in their racial enemy’s face out of spite for their comparative failures. What they cannot do themselves, they take from others. And they will continue taking, continue escalating until the system finally collapses. The only question is whether it will go with a whimper (Rome) or with a bang (Nazi Germany). Considering the sundry (growing) international hostilities and it’s looking like it could be the latter option.

    Combine this grievance trend with the coming Boomer retirement, demographic collapse, automation, and ferocious Chinese competition, and the US population will experience a steep decline in living standards over the next 25 years. This will further fan the flames, especially considering demographic trends which show no sign of reversing any time soon. The US may then lash out in a desperate attempt to maintain its standard of living – embargoing oil-rich countries like Iran and Venezuela (already underway), trade wars with China, military adventurism, “otherizing” phantom enemies like the Russians – blaming them for all the country’s ills.

    This will not end well, I think. The way I see things, whites have just two choices: emigrate or separate via national dissolution. The latter option is gaining some minor traction on the internet. If anyone but Biden or Trump wins in 2020, expect to see this option become more widely discussed, especially since it will be clear by that point that no republican can win the White House again, and perhaps the GOP can never win congress again either, meaning there will NEVER be another conservative judge to stop the onslaught. Expect massive SJW reprisals at that point. Goodbye traditional freedoms like speech and gun rights. Reparations could be the least of it as Zimbabwe and South Africa have shown.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  72. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous

    If you think of all of us (whites) as an enemy of yours, then you have revealed yourself to be an enemy of ours. So why should we give a single solitary damn what you want?

  73. Jack D says:
    @istevefan

    You ain’t seen nuthin’ yet. More than half of all births now are to non-whites so 50%+ non-white is only a matter of time. The die is already cast.

    • Replies: @Prodigal son
  74. Mr. Anon says:
    @Nick Diaz

    ……but America receiving 1 billion immigrants over the next decade is not unreasonable.

    It is completely unreasonable, and you are unreasonable for saying it.

    You are a f**king moron. Nobody cares what you think, pendejo.

  75. Mr. Anon says:

    Citizenism might have worked had it been adopted 15 or 20 years ago, but that opportunity has passed and it ain’t coming back. As the current Democratic primary race makes plain, whites are going to get minority identity politics shoved down our throats by the Democratic Party. And the Republican Party leadership will be standing in the back, limply objecting “Hey, you can’t do that……….”. They don’t care as they ultimately all serve the same plutocratic masters.

    It’s time whites started practicing identity politics too, in ernest and without apology.

  76. The wisest man in American history, Benjamin Franklin, pointed out in 1754 that Americans enjoyed the highest standard of living in the world, with high wages and low land prices allowing early and nearly universal marriage, due to the low population density.

    Hmmm… what does the data say about this?
    https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/104/17/7301.full.pdf

    “Here we present empirical evidence indicating that the processes relating urbanization to economic development and knowledge creation are very general, being shared by all cities belonging to the same urban system and sustained across different nations and times. Many diverse properties of cities from patent production and personal income to electrical cable length are shown to be power law functions of population size with scaling exponents, 􏰏, that fall into distinct universality classes. Quantities reflecting wealth creation and innovation have 􏰏 􏰀1.2 >1 (increas- ing returns), whereas those accounting for infrastructure display 􏰏 􏰀0.8 <1 (economies of scale). "

    Ben was wrong.

  77. Anonymous[425] • Disclaimer says:

    1. I wouldn’t blame Nixon, esp in relation to Asians/Hindus. While Asians get some AA from the Nixonian legacy, they are also affected by anti-Asian AA in schools. If anything, most Asians have more to gain from GOP policies economically. So, why do they vote Dem? For some, it’s more immigration and chain-migration. But bigger factor among young Asians is PC and pop culture dominated by Jews, homos, and blacks. As they’re indoctrinated and idol-influenced by media and academia, they turn Democratic. Also, as aspiring status seekers, they notice that the most elite institutions are dominated by progs and Libs in places like Harvard and Silicon Valley. So, the reasons are less economic and more status-related and ‘righteous’ as PC is the neo-religion.

    2. Elites and even plebs find newcomers useful against black crime. As David Cole has written, better browns than blacks. Browns litter but work for cheap whereas blacks steal and kill. On that note, immigration makes some sense in the US where blacks are most destructive. Great majority of immigrants are non-blacks(though too many Africans have also arrived). What is truly insane is Europe adopting mass immigration when so many newcomers are blacks. The great blessing of Europe in contrast to the US was its lack of black. They are giving up that advantage big time.

    3. Another factor is American Conservative obeisance to Jewish Money and Jews-as-godmen. GOP is essentially the party of crook Sheldon Adelson. Also, as GOP figured it had little chance of winning over blacks and browns, its big prize was Jews with talent and money. The Jewish Strategy. But if Southern Strategy worked and if the American South was controlled & used by the GOP, Jews were too smart and got to manipulate the GOP all the while remaining mostly Democratic. GOP is based on a contradiction. Its future has been premised on winning over Jews, but as Jews are most anti-white-goy and most ‘liberal’, the only way whites can win over Jews is by destroying Conservatism and White Interests. The John McCain and David French way. Or by pushing more wars for Israel.

  78. @Harry Baldwin

    Yes, different worlds. Now it’s time for different governments. If the power of the Federal government were reduced, we could all separate to different states. Since that won’t happen until the feds collapse, we’re likely to see secession, perhaps violent.

    • Agree: TTSSYF
  79. El Dato says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    > Fergusan
    > Fergason

    Not sure whether A.I. or challenged.

    > But a national fear of doing their jobs cause for increased crime unsupported.

    Uhh… yeah? I doubt there is much fear. Work on your premises.

    “Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to problematic traffic stops. Let’s go to the donut shop instead.”

  80. @Nick Diaz

    America will need to add another 800 million to 2.5 billion immigrants over the next 10-20 to maintain stable GDP growth

    Adding 2.5 to nearly 8 times our current population in 20 years is the recipe for “stability”?!?!? This is so stupid that it could actually be a Democratic Party platform point.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    , @Autochthon
  81. @Anonymous

    What group is most likely to commit another Holocaust?

    The Turks, against the Kurds.

    • Replies: @El Dato
  82. By the way something, if you’re trying to sell your personal views as the only proper ones, apparently the proper percentage to claim remains “97%”:

    “When you have 97 percent of the people in the country who want universal background checks”

  83. El Dato says:
    @Anonymous

    To prevent another Holocaust we must implement a Holocaust.

    Gotcha!

    Also:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history

    “Whites” are only seriously in the list because they have been more or less “the latest in the queue” and the size of the populations involved is increasing. Get ready for a lot more.

  84. Alfa158 says:

    “Obama “said he has been stopped many times for an apparent traffic violation.””
    This settles once and for all whether Obama was authentically Black, or someone basically raised as a a White guy but yearning to be Black. When you know you violated a law but think it was just “apparently” a violation and the po-po only stopped you because you are Black, then my son, you are at the core Black.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
    , @J.Ross
    , @TTSSYF
  85. Anon[294] • Disclaimer says:

    OT

    Former Japanese prime minister Koizumi’s son, also a politician, announced his marriage to a Japanese newscaster. She’s already pregnant. This is really common in Japan and is not frowned upon at all.

    I’d never really thought about it before, but I wonder if it’s a sort of fertility check before marriage?

    He’s 38, she’s 41, so she got in just under the gate, and he’s probably not getting more than one kid, and let’s hope the kid isn’t Down’s.

    • Replies: @Flip
  86. @Anonymous

    Jews? Against pretty much anyone who gets in their way, usually with the help of proxies and assorted useful idiots, of course.

  87. El Dato says:
    @Harry Baldwin

    This is a complicated and ugly story.

    Apparently Tutsi leadership added prestologs to the burning fire, decamped and let the remaining Tutsi hi-polloi get massacred to have a justification for violently reasserting power. Upcoming elections would have meant they would be thrown out. This is confusing. But why not.

    https://consortiumnews.com/2018/11/15/et-tu-rt-amplifying-western-disinformation-on-rwanda/

    In fact, the U.S. and United Kingdom backed Gen. Paul Kagame’s invasion of Rwanda from Uganda on Oct. 1, 1990, and prevented a United Nations intervention until he and his army had massacred their way to Rwanda’s capital, Kigali, to seize power on July 4, 1994.

    Judi Rever: He [Kagame] did not stop the genocide because at the same time that ethnic Tutsis were being killed in Hutu-controlled zones, his Tutsi troops were killing with equal zeal and organization. And in every zone that the Rwandan Patriotic Front and its army entered, they killed massively and in an organized way.

    CBC: Killed Hutus?

    Judi Rever: Killed Hutus. They also fueled the genocide against the Tutsis. They infiltrated the Hutu militias very successfully, and they baited the violence. They egged on the violence, but they also—some of their commandos—participated in the slaughter of Tutsis at roadblocks.

  88. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:

    What group is most likely to commit another Holocaust?

    The Turks, against the Kurds.

    That wouldn’t be perceived by the Jews as “another Holocaust” although they would probably take an interest in it because Kurds are a wedge for Israel against both Arabs and Turks.

    The key motivator to destroy Whites via mass immigration is the perceived “threat” to Jews of pogroms or expulsions, or of intermarriage (so-called “Second Holocaust”). Turks are not seen as much of a threat in those respects.

  89. Alfa158 says:
    @El Dato

    I think Nick was being sarcastic. Notice he also dropped in the gag about how free trade is an absolute must because of the crucial need for a supply of cheap TVs. He is using a reductio ad absurdum argument against open borders.

    • Replies: @peterike
    , @syonredux
    , @TTSSYF
  90. peterike says:
    @Alfa158

    I think Nick was being sarcastic. Notice he also dropped in the gag about how free trade is an absolute must because of the crucial need for a supply of cheap TVs. He is using a reductio ad absurdum argument against open borders.

    No. He’s just a complete idiot, as his entire posting career demonstrates.

    • Replies: @Alfa158
  91. bomag says:
    @Nick Diaz

    Ahh, Nick Diaz. I was thinking that we should have an immigrant Olympics and line up the Jorge Ramos-s, Nick Diaz-s, Suketu Mehta-s; etc. of the country and let them compete in trash talking; dubious statistics; revisionist history etc. for cash and prizes.

  92. jb says:

    I think the argument that the United States is the property of its citizens, and that one consequence of immigration is that some of your property is being given away, is a good one that isn’t used often enough.

    In particular it’s an argument that at least in theory should make sense even to hard core Libertarians. I used the argument once against a Libertarian and his response was a very quick and defensive “nobody owns the country.” I wasn’t able to make him see the contradiction in his thinking, but then I didn’t have much time to try, and the argument clearly did make him uncomfortable. I think the problem is that the idea of collective ownership of an entire country is kind of an abstract idea to grasp, so language needs to be developed to make the concept and its implications clear. (One huge advantage the Left has over the Right is that the Left has control over the academy, which is one giant factory for the development and refinement of language).

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  93. Spud Boy says:

    I’m sure another reason politicians love immigration is that people from $hithole countries are unlikely to complain about the conditions here. They have no recollection of a time when the country was a better place.

    • Agree: Dtbb
  94. Anonymous[279] • Disclaimer says:

    For non-whites, even an imploded US is better than what they got back home.

    For many in smaller and more homogeneous nations, America seems so much more exciting.

    In a way, it’s less about empowerment than ‘subpowerment’, to submit and be part of the reigning power in the world.

    Where Jews and Hindus have something in common is that they are the only two groups whose ancient identities and cultures are still alive, define them, and shape their behavior.

  95. El Dato says:
    @eah

    Missing keys, holes in fence and a single padlock: welcome to Congo’s nuclear plant: The IAEA is worried that lax security could lead to enriched uranium falling into the wrong hands

    One can only hope that China moves in with a few CANDUs which are then not bombed by US AFRICOM because “muh empire”.

  96. CJC says:
    @El Dato

    Who in their right mind would want to live in an America with an additional 800 million people on top of what we have now? More people = More problems.

  97. R.G. Camara says: • Website
    @TTSSYF

    This. This. A thousand times this.

  98. @Mr McKenna

    “Their own neighborhoods, free of whites and white privilege, and exactly as much policing as they care to do themselves. It’s what they want, and what they deserve”

    The problem is that now they can go into any district they want and cause mayhem and destruction.
    Check out the stories and check out who most of the perps here. This a mostly White part of town;
    They can easily take public transportation to these locations and yes some of them drive.

    http://www.cwbchicago.com/

  99. R.G. Camara says: • Website
    @Alfa158

    This. Blacks and their enablers push the notion of “DWB” (Driving while black—i.e. police pulling over blacks for no reason) but when questioned 99% of stories fall apart. “Yeah, ok I was speeding…yeah, I was blaring my music at ridiculous levels….yeah, I was yelling at people out of the car….yeah, I ran a stop sign….yeah, I waived a gun…yeah, the guy in the car with me was a suspect for a murder….”

    I remember more than a decade or maybe two ago when Rick Reilly at Sports Illustrated wrote an article claiming that DWB was real, quoting a bunch of black jocks without investigating further. It was such a blatant kiss-ass article to black lying about their criminality that it is one of the big moments in my life when I realized sportwswriters are pathetic suckup losers, began to drift away from sports slowly in my life, but that article was one of the many catalysts.

    • Replies: @William Badwhite
  100. syonredux says:
    @Nick Diaz

    “The wisest man in American history, Benjamin Franklin, pointed out in 1754 that Americans enjoyed the highest standard of living in the world,”

    America did not have the highest standard of living in the World in the late 18th century. America was always a relatively rich country, but in the late 18th century it had a lower standard of living not only compared to Europe’s, but also even to Central American colonies.

    Nicky, dear boy, I don’t think that you understand how one evaluates “standard of living.”European Visitors coming to mainland Anglo-America in the 18th century were astonished at the absence of poverty.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  101. syonredux says:
    @Alfa158

    I think Nick was being sarcastic. Notice he also dropped in the gag about how free trade is an absolute must because of the crucial need for a supply of cheap TVs. He is using a reductio ad absurdum argument against open borders.

    Yes, the eternal argument: Is Nicky an idiot, or is he a parody account? I think that the weight of the evidence suggests the former, not the latter…..

    • Replies: @El Dato
  102. @Achmed E. Newman

    Blacks don’t care that mass immigration materially harms them. (Not that they can see the three chess moves ahead that makes this the case, anyway). They support non-White immigration because it harms White people, and that is what matters. If they take a collateral hit, that’s fine, so long as the greater good of harming White people is achieved. They don’t even mind that immigrants are hoovering up their jobs, since a substantial number of blacks have no intention of ever working in the first place.

    Blacks assume, largely correctly, that non-White immigrants will naturally gravitate into the newly-created, non-historical, non-existent, artificial identity known as People of Color. (Hey, remember when the Mughals and the Ashanti Empire were united in their struggle to… oh, never mind.) Basically it’s a grand historical form of Cultural Appropriation: POCs boost the numbers of the black kulturkampf simply by being non-White, and as a reward for being good foot-soldiers in the Struggle, immigrant POCs are granted some of blacks’ Magical Racial Grievance Juju: some Pakistani who’s been here for a week gets to feel the same Righteous Black Resentment as the actual black descendants of slaves, just because he’s the right shade, so long as he picks Whitey’s pocket.

    It’s all part of swelling the ranks of the Jewish-led Grand Army of the Resentful, whose Prime Directive is of course: if it harms the goyim, then it must be good for the Jews.

    • Agree: Joseph Doaks
    • Replies: @ChrisZ
  103. OP says:

    I don’t agree with AA, but the only two groups who should get are: Black Americans who are of slave descent and Native Americans who are actually natives to the US. No Mayas, Aztecs, or others from Latin America and no blacks from Jamaica or Nigeria should get any sort of AA.
    But this will never happen because the political will is not there.

  104. Whiskey says: • Website

    It’s over Steve. Open Borders is what most Americans want.

    Hatred of White men is universal. White Women particularly urban professionals and non Whites all hate us and want us gone or made serfs.

    That’s going to happen. Our future is working like crazy while living under a bridge to provide free stuff for immigrants.

    Get rid of hope and reason. Just survive. America is dead and finished like White peoples every where.

    Learn Spanish. Invest in skin darkening cream. Change your name to Garcia or Hernandez. Try to pass for non White. Survive. It’s over for White men everywhere.

  105. anon[333] • Disclaimer says:

    Breaking News from Donald Trump’s White House:

    “We want to allow millions of people to come in . . . We have to have legal immigration, not illegal immigration.” pic.twitter.com/avZsfRZWFh

    — The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 7, 2019

  106. @Achmed E. Newman

    True. If blacks would just do the maff…

    Wait until AA adopts intersectionality maff then the pie slice gets even smaller.

  107. Victor says:

    In the article, Steve mentions that the Nixon administration extended affirmative action to all non-white immigrants. It seems to me that a lot of policies from that era (affirmative action to immigrants, busing, etc.) depended on the white share of the population staying at around 85%. All of these policies fall apart without a white supermajority.

  108. @Jack D

    True…already 50% of those under the age of 20 are non-white…..and every year we allow 950,000 non-white aliens to migrate across our borders….

    Most white people in America are over the age of 50. While most Non-whites are under the age of 30. In 30 years half the whites alive today will be gone….most of the non-whites alive today will still be living (along with an additional 60 million People of Color)

    In 50 years few living whites will have any memories of America being a majority white nation….the children of today will never experience being among the majority of their generation.

  109. JimB says:

    Just how much education do America’s future cooks, gardeners, and drug mules really need? Which leads to the second question. If we spent the entire military budget on educating Hispanic children today, what would we get for our money? …Excuse me, what would we get for the money gringos raped from the Latin American money forests originally planted by the Aztecs.

  110. res says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Where is Bezos’ 300,000 acres, BTW?

    The answer is just a simple web search away. Mostly in Texas.

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/business-leaders/heres-how-much-property-jeff-bezos-owns-in-the-us

    Van Horn, Texas

    The multibillionaire, who grew up on his grandparents’ ranch in a small Texas town, owns more than 300,000 acres in the state, most of which is part of “Corn Ranch.” He told a local newspaper in 2005 that he bought the 30,000-acre Figure 2 ranch to give his family the same experience.

    • Replies: @Unladen Swallow
  111. JayeAre says:

    Steve, I’m glad you’re calling attention to the link between empire (invade) and identity politics (invite).

    The military has been a big, perhaps unwitting, proponent of multiculturalism. You can’t have decades of sending millions of shall we say non-homosexual young men overseas without them bringing home war brides, other women and children.

    This has been going on for some time now. What was Hemmingway’s line about going broke gradually, then suddenly?

    • Agree: Dissident
  112. Lurker says:
    @Harry Baldwin

    Agree – the middle ground has all but disappeared.

  113. J.Ross says:

    We have got on our lives to break this frame-owning where their vitriolic genocidal physically violent hatred is somehow never counted as hatred. Probably best to use the Bracket (a line about tolerance captioning an image of typical antifa behavior).
    The completely worthless Democrat FBI released a statement yesterday: the Elizabeth Warren-endorsing open anarchafeminist leftist in Dayton was described as being interested in “violent ideologies.” This is unforgivable, it’s simple political bias. Anything rightish is trumpeted as typically right wing, and an explicit leftist is interested in thought systems of some mysterious unnamed sort. You can still do anything as long as you’re a leftist and the only leftists who have been punished in any way were the suicidal morons who forced responding cops to shoot them — had they made it to the FBI they’d probably be alive.

  114. FPD72 says:
    @Anonymous

    What does Exodus 34:7 mean?

    The word translated “mercy” is חֵסֵד, which is generally understood as referring to God’s loyal love or covenant loyalty. This verse teaches that the iniquity and its punishment will continue in the family if left unchecked. This does not go on as long as the outcomes for good (thousands versus third or fourth generations), and it is limited to those who hate God.

  115. J.Ross says:
    @Alfa158

    Quibble: Obama wasn’t half white, he was half fed, and feds, like blacks, do not think the law applies to them.

  116. J.Ross says:
    @Oleaginous Outrager

    The math doesn’t work because he’s clearly thinking in terms of previous, more productive immigrants, and he’s letting the unproductive far outstrip the productive to the point where you just can’t get it back.
    Democrats are forcing civil war (again).

    • Replies: @Oleaginous Outrager
  117. Anon[332] • Disclaimer says:

    Honestly like, at this point I wouldn’t mind the socialists winning, just so people would shut up about TRUMP. I want everything that goes wrong to be the other guy’s fault for a change.

    It’s like that episode of The Simpsons where Homer runs for garbage commissioner, and the other guy is like OK FINE FINE… because he knows it’s all gonna blow up in their faces.

  118. FPD72 says:
    @Anonymous

    What regulations has Trump rolled back from which we benefit? How about expanding BLM and off-shore tracts that are available for oil and gas exploration and development? Or are you against more well-paying jobs for working-class Americans, improving our balance of trade, reducing our dependency on foreign oil, and paying less at the pump?

  119. Anon[332] • Disclaimer says:
    @HammerJack

    Uh maybe because that’s the easiest thing for him to do, and it’s introduced ideas like those shared by the real ppl here, into the mainstream?

    Anything concrete he tries to do will always be fought tooth and nail. Leftists literally have nothing else to live for.

  120. Corvinus says:
    @Beliavsky

    ” I wish Sailer would show some intellectual honesty and occasionally criticize a president he supports, when the circumstances merit it.”

    It’s as if there a series of significant investigations into the current president, and nary a peep from the resident NOTICER.

    “Does Steve think Trump’s race trolling (Mexican rapists, “rat-infestd”, “go back to their own countries”, “fire the SOBs” (referring to black, protesting NFL players) ought to be scaled back?”

    No. The reasoning? Sailer Pro Bono–Accuse your opponent of exactly the machinations you allegedly disdain, yet religiously employ. [Perhaps we can raise Lee Atwater from the dead and craft Southern Strategy 2]

    “If a president cited crime statistics to rile up racial hatred, but his speech was immediately followed by a terrorist massacre, would he be criticized?”

    Citing crime statistics to demonstrate a point. To Mr. Sailer, he believes it is racial hatred. The speech was followed by what Sailer labels as a “terrorist massacre”. I would imagine that ANY AND ALL such incidents regardless of Who/Whom are the assailants will be specifically referred to by the Man with the Pattern Recognition Skills moving forward.

    “Well, not if he were Barack Obama, whose July 7, 2016,TV oration from Warsaw denouncing the police shootings of two black men was followed later that day by the murder of five policemen at a Dallas Black Lives Matter march.”

    So, Mr. Sailer, why no mention of Obama’s immediate reaction to that horrific act of violence? Let me indulge you.

    https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/08/politics/obama-dallas-police-shootings/index.html

    “According to various studies—not just one, but a wide range of studies that have been carried out over a number of years—African-Americans are 30 percent more likely than whites to be pulled over.”

    Absolutely true. But why? From https://openpolicing.stanford.edu/findings

    “These patterns illustrate the disparate impact of policing on minority communities. However, as with stop rates, these disparities may not be due to bias. In nearly every jurisdiction, stopped black and Hispanic drivers are searched more often than whites. But if minorities also happen to carry contraband at higher rates, these higher search rates may stem from appropriate police work. Disentangling discrimination from effective policing is challenging and requires more subtle statistical analysis…Nobel Prize winner Gary Becker proposed looking at search outcomes. If officers don’t discriminate, he argued, they should find contraband — like illegal drugs or weapons — on searched minorities at the same rate as on searched whites. If searches of minorities turn up contraband at lower rates than searches of whites, the outcome test suggests officers are applying a double standard, searching minorities on the basis of less evidence. In our data, the success rate of searches (or the hit rate) is generally lower for Hispanic drivers compared to whites; so the outcome test indicates Hispanics face discrimination. For black drivers, search hit rates are typically in line with those of white drivers, indicating an absence of discrimination. Becker’s outcome test is a compelling measure of discrimination. But it’s also an imperfect barometer of bias. The test can fail to detect discrimination when it’s there and can indicate discrimination when it’s not there, as we and other researchers have observed.”

    “But according to a 2011 report by Obama’s own Bureau of Justice Statistics, blacks, who make up only 13 percent of the population, commit 56.9 percent of shooting homicides.”

    Due in large part to poverty, unemployment, and gang violence. In other words, environmental.

    “The accelerating Scramble for America, in which the world’s 7.5 billion pre-Americans stake their claim to the USA, offers numerous benefits for American elites, such as lower wages to pay, higher prices for their property, more pliable voters, and greater opportunities to trade visas to foreigners in return for meddling abroad.”

    The results due to Americans who gain elite status by employing the rules of capitalism. Praytell, who are these “elites”? What is their background?

    “The stratagem of choice lately has been to demonize any attempt to limit the quantity or improve the quality of immigrants as “white racism” or “white supremacy” or “white nationalism,” and assert guilt by association with the latest (but one) mass shooter.”

    Actually, because a number on the left characterizes certain groups as “beyond reproach” and a number on the right portrays those same groups as “wicked and threatening” is why reasonable discussion about immigration reform in unable to gain traction.

    “The wisest man in American history, Benjamin Franklin, pointed out in 1754 that Americans enjoyed the highest standard of living in the world, with high wages and low land prices allowing early and nearly universal marriage, due to the low population density.”

    The “wise man” also had stark insight into a certain group of Europeans. Was he dead wrong in his assessment? –> “Those who come hither are generally of the most ignorant Stupid Sort of their own Nation…and as few of the English understand the German Language, and so cannot address them either from the Press or Pulpit, ’tis almost impossible to remove any prejudices they once entertain…Not being used to Liberty, they know not how to make a modest use of it…I remember when they modestly declined intermeddling in our Elections, but now they come in droves, and carry all before them, except in one or two Counties…In short unless the stream of their importation could be turned from this to other colonies, as you very judiciously propose, they will soon so out number us, that all the advantages we have will not in My Opinion be able to preserve our language, and even our Government will become precarious.”

    “and a moratorium on net immigration so no party can rig elections through importing ringers.”

    LOL. What do you think our representative democratic nation was built on, Mr. Sailer?

  121. syonredux says:
    @Nick Diaz

    Steve Sailer, you are also a hypocrite of colossal proportions. You go on and one about how America is great because it has so much land and open spaces, and that because of that immigration should be restricted, yada yada. Then, you follow your anti-immigration rant with an article on affordable family formation, on how to get Americans to have more kids. Oh wait, I thought you argued that demographic growth is a bad thing? Ah, I get it. It’s not that you don’t want more people…you just want your kind of people: white conservatives. Hypocrite.

    Matter of preference, dear boy. If Anglo-America must have more people, I would rather have more of this:

    And less of this:

    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
    , @Lot
  122. Hopscotch says:
    @Hunsdon

    Is it weird there is never a policy proposal geared towards subsidizing the affluent to have children? Like a graduated tax write-off? No eugenics for the Boomers to pearl clutch over.

    In Hungary, if a woman has more than four children, she does not pay income tax…for life.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/hungary-axes-income-tax-women-4-or-more-kids-n969936

  123. anon[183] • Disclaimer says:

    Calvin Hobbes here. For some reason I can’t post as usual.

    Here’s an article from yesterday’s NYT about Driving While Black:

    Stopped, Ticketed, Fined: The Pitfalls of Driving While Black in Ferguson
    Despite five years of changes in Missouri, black drivers continue to be stopped at much higher rates than white drivers in communities throughout the state.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/us/black-drivers-traffic-stops.html?searchResultPosition=1

    The article describes blacks who have been racistly oppressed by the police for speeding, driving with a suspended license, broken tail lights, driving without insurance, not paying tickets, and ignoring court dates. It turns out that the cops can racistly oppress black drivers for this sort of stuff even when the vehicle has dark, tinted windows, though it’s not explained how the cops can tell that a driver is black without seeing the driver. The Ferguson Chief of Police and more than half of the Ferguson cops are now black, but the racial disparities in traffic stops are obviously still because of racism. Redlining a couple of generations ago must be part of it.

    And of course there’s the usual business about the famous “unarmed black teenager”:

    “After a police officer killed an unarmed black teenager named Michael Brown five years ago this month in Ferguson, Mo., protests there rocked the nation, leading to a public outcry over race and policing.”

    Most of the comments point out how idiotic the article is. The jokes write themselves!

    Yesterday morning the article was prominently feature on the NYT home page.
    Someone at the NYT must have noticed how embarrassingly stupid the article is, so by afternoon it was relegated to an inconspicuous spot on the “US News” page. It’s still there on the “US News” page, but buried so far down that it might as well have been pushed down the Memory Hole.

  124. syonredux says:
    @Corvinus

    “and a moratorium on net immigration so no party can rig elections through importing ringers.”

    LOL. What do you think our representative democratic nation was built on, Mr. Sailer?

    Europeans.Sadly, we’re not getting many of them these days….

    The “wise man” also had stark insight into a certain group of Europeans. Was he dead wrong in his assessment?

    Let’s see:

    Yet I am not for refusing entirely to admit them [Germans] into our Colonies: all that seems to be necessary is, to distribute them more equally, mix them with the English, establish English Schools where they are now too thick settled, and take some care to prevent the practice lately fallen into by some of the Ship Owners, of sweeping the German Gaols to make up the number of their Passengers.I say I am not against the Admission of Germans in general, for they have their Virtues, their industry and frugality is exemplary; They are excellent husbandmen and contribute greatly to the improvement of a Country.

    https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-04-02-0173

    Seems fairly accurate to me…..

  125. @Oleaginous Outrager

    Disposable diapers and asswipe to the heavens, you fool! It’s growth, Growth GROWTH if more people buy more shit: nothing else matters but GDP. PPP is a hack premise, and everyone knows it.

    What’s YOUR proposal, anyway? Replacement-level reproduction and a stable society? Fuck off, that would mean The Economy is not growing!

    • Replies: @Oleaginous Outrager
  126. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @jb

    Interesting comment!

    I think the problem is that the idea of collective ownership of an entire country is kind of an abstract idea to grasp, so language needs to be developed to make the concept and its implications clear.

    What language would you suggest be used?

  127. Forbes says:

    “According to various studies—not just one, but a wide range of studies that have been carried out over a number of years—African-Americans are 30 percent more likely than whites to be pulled over.”

    Yes, and anyone with curiosity and a hint of skepticism will look at the underlying data to discover that the explanation for the disparity is that blacks don’t just exceed the speed limit, they exceed it by the most.

    A story so old, this is from 2002:

    “According to a new study, black drivers on the New Jersey Turnpike are twice as likely to speed as white drivers, and are even more dominant among drivers breaking 90 miles per hour. … According to the study commissioned by the New Jersey attorney general and leaked first to the New York Times and then to the Web, blacks make up 16 percent of the drivers on the turnpike, and 25 percent of the speeders in the 65-mile-per-hour zones, where profiling complaints are most common. (The study counted only those going more than 15 miles per hour over the speed limit as speeders.) Black drivers speed twice as much as white drivers, and speed at reckless levels even more. Blacks are actually stopped less than their speeding behavior would predict—they are 23 percent of those stopped.”
    https://www.city-journal.org/html/racial-profiling-myth-debunked-12244.html

    Hence, the disparity. There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. Obama was adept at all three.

  128. Anon7 says:
    @Nick Diaz

    We need another 800 million immigrants just to keep the economy going… America will need to add another 800 million to 2.5 billion immigrants over the next 10-20 to maintain stable GDP growth… America receiving 1 billion immigrants over the next decade is not unreasonable.

    Aha! I knew that somebody would go with Canada’s CenturyInitiative.ca programme for the USA. However, that initiative is supposed to play out over the next 80 years, not a decade! Even “Plugs” Biden knows that number is too big!

    The only reason the “immigrants pay for themselves” scam has worked so far is that nobody has counted in the $22 trillion in extra pocket money that the Government has come up with. You have to go slow. Otherwise, people start pointing out that Rwandan guy arrested for rape in Massachusetts who has twelve kids in the public schools for a total of $2.5 million and he drives an Uber!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  129. Read the whole thing there.

    How could I not? After that riveting teaser threatening to expose the secret of Obama’s traffic tickets, I just had to click right over.

    But all kidding aside, I did read the article. Congratulations to Steve for his conclusory recognition that greed and avarice and the promise of free stuff is what’s driving the politics of the immigration question. It’s very much like when the Spanish conquistadors came to Central America. Anybody who’s ever wondered why the Europeans set themselves upon the natives with such energy, need only recall that the Indians were freely displaying gold trinkets worth a fortune in the Spanish market. When the jewelry taken off one Aztec priest can buy you an estate back in Spain, the motivations of the Spanish aren’t hard to understand.

    But these sorts of arbitrage opportunities are quickly dissolved away. Perhaps therein is a lesson teaching us how this all is going to turn out. Neither the Spanish Empire nor the new political arrangements of Latin American benefited long-term from the inflationary sugar rush of gold-laden galleons returning to Spanish ports. Spain dwindled in relative importance and the Americas south of the Rio Grande became a permanent basket case.

  130. Trump Policy:

    INVITE THE WORLD

    IN HOCK TO THE WORLD

    ISRAEL FIRST

    Trump says he wants to flood the USA with mass legal immigration “in the largest numbers ever.”

  131. Anonymous[182] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Could there have been Jewish Rwandans?

    Who killed J.R.?

  132. ChrisZ says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    “Grand Army of the Resentful”–is that your coinage, Germ Theory? It’s a good one.

  133. Hopscotch says:
    @Hopscotch

    This would provide an easy ticket to a 2020 victory, for whichever party proposes it.

    If Trump were to propose it, it would be doubly satisfying, watching “women-friendly” Dems and “pro-family” RINO’s trying to explain their lack of support.

  134. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @Walsh2

    The term “white nationalism,” on the other hand allows those that use it to paint with a broader brush and thus demonize or other a larger segment of the population.

    White nationalism just means a preference for Whites to remain a majority in a country.

    • Replies: @Joseph Doaks
  135. El Dato says:

    Trump sending coded messages to dormant Nazi cells!

    NBC pundit says Trump’s order to fly flags at half-staff after shootings could be nod to Hitler

    Trump issued a proclamation to lower flags to half-staff at the White House and other government and military buildings on Sunday to mourn the victims of shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio. The flags will return to full-staff on Thursday, August 8 — but former FBI assistant director for counterintelligence turned-NBC pundit Frank Figliuzzi has seen a possible conspiracy in the date.

    Figliuzzi explained that the number 88 is “very significant in the neo-Nazi and white supremacist movement”due to the fact that ‘H’ is the eighth letter of the alphabet and“the numbers 88 together stand for Heil Hitler.”

    I’m gonna retain an African Witch doctor to cast evil eyes in the direction of medja personalities. I’m ordering oozing pustules followed by liquefaction and subsequent spontaneous generation of maggots from the remains.

  136. anon[542] • Disclaimer says:

    “Due in large part to poverty, unemployment, and gang violence. In other words, environmental.”

    They cause their own poor environment, but yet their problems are all the fault of bad juju. Got it.

    BTW, the connection between poverty and crime is more complicated than one might naively think:

    “But when Sariaslan and his team factored in the behavior of cousins and siblings into those hazard rates to try and account for unknowns like genetic differences and household culture — “unobserved familial risk factors” — the strong correlation between low socioeconomic status and crime and drug abuse essentially vanished.” … “What does that mean? For those who think simply giving money to the poor will automatically solve social ills, this study gives good reason for a rethink.”

    http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/08/31/Questioning-Connection-Between-Poverty-and-Crime

    “LOL. What do you think our representative democratic nation was built on, Mr. Sailer?”

    Remember all those Arabic presidents we had before 1965? Me neither. How come?

    “The other is a policy of more recent origin and seeks to shield our wage earners from the disastrous competition of a great influx of foreign peoples. This has been done by the restrictive immigration law. This saves the American job for the American workmen. I should like to see the administrative features of this law rendered a little more humane for the purpose of permitting those already here a greater latitude in securing admission of members of their own families. But I believe this law in principle is necessary and sound, and destined to increase greatly the public welfare. We must maintain our own economic position, we must defend our own national integrity.”

    —President Calvin Coolidge 1924 address to congress.

    “The results due to Americans who gain elite status by employing the rules of capitalism. Praytell, who are these “elites”? What is their background?”

    1) ‘Who runs Hollywood? C’mon’: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2008-dec-19-oe-stein19-story.html

    2) 20% of Top 50 billionaires: https://www.timesofisrael.com/10-jews-in-forbes-top-50-billionaires/

    3) ‘Trump watched US midterm results with top GOP donor Sheldon Adelson’: https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-watched-us-midterm-results-with-top-gop-donor-sheldon-adelson/

    … do I need to continue?

    “It’s as if there a series of significant investigations into the current president, and nary a peep from the resident NOTICER.”

    Partisan investigations = guilt. Got it. Remember all those times Corvinus alleged Mueller was going to get Trump on “collusion” and precisely dill came of it? And then the report came out and exactly zero people were ever charged with collusion because the report found no evidence that it occurred:

    https://www.wired.com/story/mueller-says-no-collusion-trump-russia-investigation/

    “Sailer Pro Bono–Accuse your opponent of exactly the machinations you allegedly disdain, yet religiously employ.”

    Funny, who else here does that?

    I’ll say this again, I disagree with Steve’s decision to allow this commenter to continue posting on this forum. It’s unfair to him and his limited abilities. With only a modicum of effort (2-3 minutes of Googling) was able to rip apart everything he wrote which I examined. I stopped here because there was no point in continuing. Most of his posts are this way. This poster contributes nothing and has, IMHO, repeatedly baited posters into committing acts of violence with the statement “what are YOU going to do about it?” One two times I might ignore, perhaps something has been misinterpreted, but this has happened repeatedly over the years. He’s a bad guy.

  137. Hans says:

    Shooting Event Frequency Post Obama “Modernization” of Smith-Mundt –

    • Replies: @El Dato
    , @anonymous
  138. anon[542] • Disclaimer says:

    OT (sorta): Indian PM announces mass migration of Indians to disputed Muslim majority province to quell spirit of independence ….. hmm, sound familiar? Where have I heard of this happening before?

    https://www.rt.com/op-ed/465899-kashmir-modi-pakistan-trump/

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  139. istevefan says:
    @Nick Diaz

    We need another 800 million immigrants just to keep the economy going, and you doofuses are compalining about the measly 1-2 million a year that America receives. Given demographic trends, America will need to add another 800 million to 2.5 billion immigrants over the next 10-20 to maintain stable GDP growth. Now, 2,5 billion might not be practical due to the fact that you need to run background checks for criminal activities on the applicants, etc, but America receiving 1 billion immigrants over the next decade is not unreasonable.

    Why not just take in the whole world so that we will have 100 percent of worldwide GDP? Alternatively, instead of physically moving everyone we can admit every nation to our union through a multiyear acquisition cycle that should see us double, triple and eventually quadruple our GDP.

    We could start with Canada, Mexico and Central America. The addition of all those peoples would blow the doors off our income statement next year.

    After that we can expand into the rest of South America. A year or so later we can expand into Asia, Africa and Europe.

    We will be the geographically biggest, economically mightiest and demographically largest nation ever to exist. In fact if our acquisition goes as planned, we will be the only nation to exist going forward. What’s not to like?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @bomag
  140. @HammerJack

    when I worked at a bar in my early 20s I had a co-worker who was fired for arriving 45 minutes late to most of his shifts. Do you know why he was fired according to him? Because he is black and the manager is “racist.” Another black person who will tell you how he feels victimized because of his race!

  141. Corvinus says:

    “Europeans. Sadly, we’re not getting many of them these days…”

    To be more specific, Enlightenment thinkers from France and England, along with Roman and Greek legal traditions. Of course, those values can be easily embraced by the human population. Although, the argument has been made by one prominent Alt Right thinker that “Many, if not most, descendants of immigrants are not the Posterity of the then-People of the United States. Neither are people living in Mexico, Germany, Israel, or even Great Britain. The U.S. Constitution was not written for them, nor was it ever intended to secure the Blessings of Liberty for them. The idea that the Constitution was intended to do anything at all for immigrants, resident aliens, or foreigners is as absurd as the idea that its emanations and penumbras provide them with an unalienable right to an abortion. The fact that courts have declared otherwise is totally irrelevant.”

    “Seems fairly accurate to me….”

    Indeed. Ethnic mixing of two different groups. Nothing inherently wrong here. But the fact remains that Franklin did not view the Germans favorably.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  142. @anonymous

    I don’t doubt it, #252, and may have read that article before even. I just think there are other things that stand out, for speeding especially if the road is busy. They could legally pull everyone if they needed the funds badly, on most interstates.

  143. @anonymous

    He IS back, but unfortunately, they got some internet back there now.

  144. Corvinus says:
    @Hopscotch

    “In Hungary, if a woman has more than four children, she does not pay income tax…for life.”

    Even if young men and women are ill-prepared intellectually or financially to care for them (freedom be damned!), and despite the wolf of Cultural Marxism that breathes down the neck of innocent Robby or Libby, every single member of the Christian libertarian intelligentsia or Greek Orthodox Brigade is obligated to hit the lecture circuit and step onto the soapbox, with bullhorn in tow, to proudly advertise to the Roissy’s and feminazi’s of the world that their outright refusal to settle down and raise (white) children is a recipe for demographic homicide.

    “Inducing” women to birth and raise children. YES! We must put forth the following proposal in those areas which suffer from low birth rates–the passage of a law at most, or substantial social pressure at the bare minimum, for white men to marry and have their concubine, I mean wife, bear five children in eight years. For those coloreds, who contribute absolutely nothing to civilization sans pestilence and chaos, enacting legislation is most desirable, or at least through brute force, to ensure they have one child. Women in their prime ought to be compelled to forgo their own life in order to produce offspring. And the men, well, who gives a damn if they are more interested in the “pump and dump” strategies of such prominent Gamers like Roissy and less inclined to deal with whiny females who ruin everything–instant fatherhood it is!

    Follow the Russian model! “Free stuff” in the form of housing and education, direct cash payments to women who pop out more chilluns (and even adjusting their work schedules to meet maternal demands!), and programs to dry out the Vodka swilling man-childs running amok. It is worth pointing out that a society in which individuals are encouraged to have (white) children by governmental intrusion is not a free society, unless you are a closet librul who advocates these forms of welfare and social engineering!

  145. @mmack

    I agree completely that 65 is a 45 is dangerous. Usually the 45 mph zone is there for a reason. I think going 20 mph over by doing 85 in a 65 on a wide-open interstate is safer than the former.

    People doing 60 in a 70 mph zone in the center, and not the right lane bother me for a whole ‘nother reason.

    Preach it, Brother Mack! That is my biggest pet peeve of all the highway (at least) driving stupidity. We don’t have so many of the 6-lane roads sections around here, but that makes it even worse, on the 4-lane – one stupid poke-ass doing 70 mph in the left lane can cause a traffic jam, but also some dangerous moves by other drivers.

  146. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @istevefan

    Alternatively, instead of physically moving everyone we can admit every nation to our union through a multiyear acquisition cycle that should see us double, triple and eventually quadruple our GDP.

    Reasonable idea. This is superior to the alternative of having foreign nationals all migrate into the existing landmass of the USA.

    It is better to acquire people AND land, than just people. The territories demarcated as Canada and Mexico, for example, possess valuable natural resources.

  147. anon[297] • Disclaimer says:

    “Of course, those values can be easily embraced by the human population.”

    Wait, didn’t you just say black dysfunction was the result of “environment”? Apparently, not so easily embraced. Considering the precedent, perhaps it is not so wise to mass immigrate foreigners with antithetical ingrained cultures into this country. We have people already in this country who haven’t, by your own implication, easily embraced “those values” like two-parent households and respect for other people’s property.

  148. @The Alarmist

    AGREED.

    For me, it was the car. I have years of data, in the form of points.

    • LOL: Dieter Kief
  149. anon[297] • Disclaimer says:

    “Even if young men and women are ill-prepared intellectually or financially to care for them”

    Hence, why the poster mentioned they don’t pay income tax …. it’s to make them financially capable of supporting those children.

  150. Corvinus says:
    @TTSSYF

    “Yes, unfortunately, I share your skepticism about the rationality of the majority of the electorate.”

    I thought that white people had high IQ’s. Now you claim that they lack the ability to reason? Why on earth would you make such an anti-white inference?

    YOU have lost hope. It doesn’t mean that the vast majority of normies share your sentiments.

    “that so many white people did not support him or vote for him but instead voted to put the feckless, divisive, shallow black dude back in office…”

    It’s called freedom to chose. Cannot white people make their own decisions about race and culture without being shamed?

    “I cut him some slack because of the forces allied against him from the moment he first declared his candidacy through the dud of a climax of Mueller’s testimony (although we don’t hear much about “Russia”, “collusion”, or even “Impeach foty-fi” lately).”

    Actually, his testimony was solid, and we still hear those things alot on the daily news.

    “The time for a conversation with the Left is over. Short of out-right civil war, it’s time to quit honoring any Lefty you know with any serious conversation about the state of affairs and go Galt to the extent possible.”

    In other words, give up. That’s fine if you want to go that route, but the rest of us will sojourn on. That is the strength of white people!

    • Replies: @WJ
  151. anon[297] • Disclaimer says:

    “and programs to dry out the Vodka swilling man-childs running amok.”

  152. @anon

    Very good comment, Mr. #425. My only disagreement might be that we don’t have any 25 years left. The financial situation will not allow that. The can can be kicked down the road for only another few years. There will be a discontinuity at that point, and we’d better know ahead of time which direction we’ll take, as a group and as families.

  153. Kronos says:

    “An important conundrum is why America’s ancient problems with the descendants of black slaves have gotten so politically intertwined with its newly concocted problems with nonwhite immigration. After all, it’s not at all reasonable why white guilt over mistreatment of African-Americans in the increasingly receding past is so often used these days to justify throwing open the borders to foreigners.”

    Everyone realizes (especially liberals) that blacks are a high-cost chronic problem. The violence will never go down. The welfare rates will never go down. The incarceration rates will never go down.

    Therefore, population transfer is the only means of removing them from inner cities. We bring in third world society drags because they demonstrate less fear against the black man. They’re not in the best position to “white flight” it out of the city. They either fight or die.

  154. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon7

    nobody has counted in the $22 trillion in extra pocket money that the Government has come up with.

    What are you referring to?

    • Replies: @Anon7
  155. eah says:

    Earlier today on the official White House Twitter timeline:

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  156. @Hunsdon

    That’s because MORE IMMIGRATION is the answer to every problem.

  157. Alfa158 says:
    @peterike

    Then I’m very disappointed in him.
    Being older than dirt, I can remember in my youth when there were actually highly intelligent Leftists. Nowadays they all seem to be either genuine dimbulbs, or people who can be intelligent in other endeavors, but when it comes to politics and culture self-lobotomize themselves into dimbulbs.
    I wonder if that is a function of the fact that Leftism and the theory of racial non-differences were half a century ago still being put into practice, and now that their failures have become evident, you have to be stupid to still believe them.
    I’m still hoping to come across another smart one again we can have non-silly debates with.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    , @Kronos
  158. FPD72 says:
    @Anon

    Concerning Bezos, you write, “As a Jew, he is politically privileged.“

    Why do you think Bezos is a Jew? His birth father was of Scandinavian descent and is identified by quora as a Christian, as is his mother. His adoptive father is an Hispanic Roman Catholic refugee from Cuba. He was married in a Congregational church in Albuquerque. The web site Jew or Not Jew identifies him as “Not a Jew.”

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @J.Ross
  159. WJ says:
    @Corvinus

    “Actually, his testimony was solid, and we still hear those things alot on the daily news.”

    Ted Lieu, lefty Democrat from the 33rd district in Cali said “I don’t know who got to him, I don’t know who talked to him, but that was very odd.” Referring to Mueller’s testimony.

    It’s been three weeks since his rambling incoherent testimony. You won’t find a thing in the media discussing Mueller in the last two weeks.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  160. J.Ross says:

    What the hell? House unanimously passes $67M gay marriage reparations bill: any homosexual claiming to have been in an unrecognized “marriage” preceding legalization can demand cash. I mean it’ll never pass the Senate but I do not remember any reporting on this.
    https://activistmommy.com/house-unanimously-passes-67-million-gay-reparations-tax-bill/

    • Replies: @Lot
  161. El Dato says:
    @Hans

    I’m dubious about this bizarro world explanation.

  162. J.Ross says:
    @anon

    Apparently India changed the autonomous status of Kashmir, sole source of official basmati rice. A few days back there were “Pakistan Strongk” type posts on 4chan talking about war with India.
    As venal as Indians are, as hilariously mismanaged as their army is, and totally gratuitous as these provocations are, India cleans Pakistan’s clock without trying every time. India has also soundly defeated the Chinese, but it can be argued that that was a “different China.”

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @DB Cooper
  163. @anonymous

    I cite this article with friends that haven’t seen the light yet. I say “this shows they weren’t stopped for driving while black, they were stopped for driving LIKE a black”.

  164. J.Ross says:
    @Alfa158

    Rick and Morty variety leftists have no intellectual heft whatsoever, it’s a fashion like having a particular color trapper-keeper. In the past people became exposed to these ideas while at more strenuous and discriminatory universities.
    And to think I once slogged through Bakunin (who at least has a cinematically amazing life story).

  165. @The Alarmist

    Signaling is a courtesy to other drivers. Courtesy ain’t their thang

  166. Lot says:
    @Jake

    Yes that is really stupid, but the number who sincerely believe that has got to be small.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  167. Kronos says:
    @Alfa158

    They exist, but are very much in hiding. The young and old alike don’t wish to be ousted. The smart ones understand very well that racial differences exist. The urban liberal class has been paying for that colossal mistake for 70 years. National immigration policy both legal and illegal is designed to remedy that by flushing out the inner city black underclass.

    But here’s a crucial part of the pretend game. If racial differences were openly acknowledged and discussed; suburbs and rural areas (future black underclass zones) would demand much higher reparations for taking them in. Black underclass denizens are VERY expensive in crime and welfare costs. If Mayors and City Operators openly complain about black (whatever) they’ll be slammed down harshly. Thus the fiction will continue until enough blacks have left the cities.

    • Replies: @Anon
  168. J.Ross says:
    @Lot

    Isn’t it worse if they don’t believe in it?
    >We’re going to effortfully carry out a sequence of events that will result in the burning down of every Jewish community North America!
    >Why?
    >[Jeopardy theme]

    • Agree: Lot
  169. @R.G. Camara

    Yep. Rick Reilly is like so many sportswriters – former dweebs in HS that really want the cool kids to like them. Except they’re not observant enough to notice that the kids that were cool in HS (jocks, life of the party types) are no longer the cool kids, they’re just dumb jocks. SI writers seem to be even worse than most other sportswriters. Yahoo’s are pretty bad as well.

    I suspect Reilly’s primary goal in life is having the black kids like him.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  170. African-Americans are 30 percent more likely than whites to be pulled over.

    This is indeed shocking. It strongly suggests underrepresentation.Too much down time in the doughnut shop?

    America’s current voters don’t much see what’s in it for them from immigration, other than more ethnic restaurants.

    It took very few Thai immigrants to support the hottest cuisine trend of the last quarter century. (The Census probably overstates Thai presence, as many Hmong, Lao, etc. refugees were born in camps in Thailand. Go by language, not birthplace.)

    Hmong make the world’s longest sausage, but haven’t been successful, or even interested, in selling it to the rest of us.

    Thais thus have one of the lowest immigrant-to-chef ratios, and Hmong one of the highest.

    If restauranteurialism is going to be used as a defense of immigration policy, the Chef Gap will have to be addressed.

    • Replies: @Lot
  171. peterike says:
    @Corvinus

    “But according to a 2011 report by Obama’s own Bureau of Justice Statistics, blacks, who make up only 13 percent of the population, commit 56.9 percent of shooting homicides.”

    Due in large part to poverty, unemployment, and gang violence. In other words, environmental.

    Lol!! Just one of the many howlers in your latest mental vomit. Hard as it is to believe, you’ve been even stupider than usual lately.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  172. Flip says:
    @Anon

    I’d never really thought about it before, but I wonder if it’s a sort of fertility check before marriage?

    Among German farmers in Missouri in the 1800s, they often didn’t get married until the woman got pregnant in order to make sure that she could.

    • Replies: @Paleo Liberal
  173. @Nick Diaz

    “Because doing so would require you to understand concepts such as division of labor, maximization of utility and comparative advantage

    Oh, I understand comparative advantage. Do you? Hint: it’s bunk.
    https://developingeconomics.org/2017/04/23/200-years-of-ricardian-trade-theory-how-is-this-still-a-thing/

  174. @Hopscotch

    That woman Rath had six children, and it’s looking like she won’t pay income taxes for the rest of her life either. So we already have the policy.

    • LOL: Achmed E. Newman
  175. eah says:

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  176. eah says:

    #MeToo

    • Replies: @El Dato
    , @eah
  177. OT

    Senator Ted Cruz asks Robert Epstein, former editor in chief of Psychology Today about Google’s manipulation of votes.

    Epstein, a Hillary Clinton voter explained, that 2,6 million votes were shifted towards Hillary Clinton via secret manipulations by Google in 2016.

    Big tech could improve these results in 2020 and bring 15 million additional Democratic votes – says Epstein.

    6 min. 30 sec. in

    • Replies: @El Dato
  178. TTSSYF says:

    I might have to do a little more research on that one.

  179. TTSSYF says:
    @Harry Baldwin

    Yes. But the Media are not promoting much anymore.

  180. @J.Ross

    The math doesn’t work because 800 million immigrants in a country of 335 million is sub-Saharan style “growth”.

  181. Forbes says:
    @El Dato

    Feelings as facts. Feelings as the truth. Now that’s the way to improve public order and public morale…

    “you will be hard pressed to find a black or Hispanic family who does not have at least one member who feels they’ve been stopped because of their race.”

    I bet even Jussie Smollett feels that way…

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  182. @Autochthon

    You’re right, I’m sorry. I will turn myself in at the nearest Chamber of Commerce Reeducation Center.

    • Replies: @Autochthon
  183. TTSSYF says:
    @Alfa158

    Yeah…guess he really was “down for the struggle.”

  184. Dissident says:
    @Anon

    Jeff Bezos is not a Jew.

    Your assertions about Judaism are at best misleading and divorced from critical context. At worse, false and libelous.

  185. @J.Ross

    India has also soundly defeated the Chinese

    When?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  186. @res

    He or Amazon also owns a sizeable chunk of office space in Seattle as well. He also owns several homes in DC, California, and NYC as well, in addition to his holdings in Texas.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  187. @FPD72

    Bezos is not Jewish, in fact, he’s more out out of an old cowboy movie than just about anybody famous in modern America. Culturally, Bezos is of Frontier Upper Class descent on his mother’s side. His mother’s side of the family were judges and big ranchers in cowboy towns. He spent much of his youth on his grandparents’ ranch in Texas. His first cousin is country singer George Strait. He’s bought huge ranches in Texas because he loves cowboy county.

  188. @Anonymous

    “White nationalism” just means a preference for Whites to remain a majority in a country. Which makes it a synonym for “racist.”

  189. @Beliavsky

    You have the other 99.9% of the internet to stick your boot in whitey’s face. Maybe you should make like horseshit and hit the dusty trail.

    • Replies: @Beliavsky
  190. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @Unladen Swallow

    He or Amazon also owns a sizeable chunk of office space in Seattle as well. He also owns several homes in DC, California, and NYC as well, in addition to his holdings in Texas.

    Mass immigration should cause his real estate to appreciate.

  191. El Dato says:
    @eah

    That’s nothing that good self-medication with opioids couldn’t fix.

    Just don’t say afterwards that it was Putin.

    “Opioids – They flush away the shame™”

  192. J.Ross says:
    @Steve Sailer

    They lost in 62 and in subsequent incidents but are ahead with the Tibetan issue and with territorial encroachment further west in the Himalayas. I shouldn’t have said “soundly.”

    • Replies: @DB Cooper
  193. J.Ross says:
    @FPD72

    Reverse the clauses and it works.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  194. El Dato says:
    @Dieter Kief

    2,6 million votes were shifted towards Hillary Clinton via secret manipulations by Google in 2016.

    Needs more details though. 2.6 – 10.4 x 10⁶ vote shifts depending on how aggressive our electronic overlords played – that’s not bad.

    Meanwhile:

    Neuroscientist used brainhack. It’s super effective! Oh, and disturbingly easy: Larry Niven’s wireheads aren’t far off

    Brain/machine interfaces offer significant benefits, in terms of helping control the body, elicit faster reactions and, in some cases, increase memory capacity. But the dangers of brain hacking mean that society needs to come up with a set of ethical guidelines to make sure the technology doesn’t get out of control.

    “What do you do with technologies that people want, but aren’t good for them?” Sawyer asked.

    “This has happened before but, in this case, they’ve never come in such fast ways. We need to understand how people condition themselves. Rats get conditioned in a matter of minutes. Now our technology is extending out of reach.”

    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
  195. Anon[234] • Disclaimer says:

    The US is the “400” year old test case for a multi racial society. And of course both sides admit it’s a colossal failure. But to prevent the general population from seeing the obvious peril in bringing in more third worlders they have to flip the script and blame the more advanced culture’s “racism” when it’s simply the mismatch on all levels of achievement that can never be resolved.

  196. El Dato says:

    Liberals see two trumpian idiots who know no history and refuse to just lay back and think of the foreign cuisine.

    People who know history see a reminder that you may not be interested in foreigners, but foreigners may be interested in you.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Kronos
  197. DB Cooper says:
    @J.Ross

    I read back in February when India and Pakistan engaged again India lost two planes while Pakistan has zero loss. Pakistan even captured an Indian pilot. How is it that India cleans Pakistan’s clock without trying every time?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  198. sayless says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    I’ve been pulled over for speeding five times and have gotten a ticket every single time. My brother has told me he’s been pulled over forty times (over a twenty-year period) but wasn’t ticketed until the forty-first. Charm City.

    Everyone I knew Back There had received at least one Warning. Me, never. And I was always (sincerely) courteous to the officers. But I don’t burst into tears easily, which can be useful apparently. (Achmed, did you try crying?)

    A cousin tells me I have an arrogant face. (“But that’s my face, not me.”). It all came to around $750. Finally I just gave up and kept to the speed limit.

    Life is so unfair.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @Elsewhere
  199. Corvinus says:
    @WJ

    “Ted Lieu, lefty Democrat from the 33rd district in Cali said “I don’t know who got to him, I don’t know who talked to him, but that was very odd.” Referring to Mueller’s testimony.”

    What is the specific context here? You are being purposely vague.

    “It’s been three weeks since his rambling incoherent testimony. You won’t find a thing in the media discussing Mueller in the last two weeks.”

    LOL. His report and testimony remains relevant in the news cycle. Do you enjoy embarrassing yourself?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/democrats-will-ask-federal-judge-to-force-testimony-from-ex-white-house-counsel-mcgahn-pelosi-says/2019/08/07/ca523fc4-b926-11e9-a091-6a96e67d9cce_story.html?noredirect=on

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/05/robert-muellers-testimony-and-the-garbled-language-of-politics

  200. @Beliavsky

    I wish Sailer would show some intellectual honesty and occasionally criticize a president he supports, when the circumstances merit it

    And when do the circumstances merit it?

    You, and your dishonest assessment, are the problem, not Sailer’s defects.

    When your dishonesty leads to progressively worse outcomes will you repent? No you will not, because your dishonesty prevents you from doing so.

    You have sown the wind; when you reap the whirlwind remember that you made the choice — not Sailer.

  201. @Steve Sailer

    He’s bought huge ranches in Texas because he loves cowboy country.

    Don’t we all?

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  202. American elites continue to subscribe to the post-1754 grand strategy of invade the world/invite the world.

    To paraphrase Nixon, “G_d d_mn them.”

  203. anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @HammerJack

    “Trump makes all manner of rude noises yet accomplishes little to none of his own program. Your call.”

    Maybe, just maybe, his program isn’t what you think it is.

  204. J.Ross says:
    @DB Cooper

    Bangladesh exists. Not only does it exist because of Indian superiority, but the Pakistani plan was to stop it from existing by killing huge numbrrs of Bangladeshis.
    You probably also read about the Indian submarine lost because they literally left the hatch open, or the mountain troopers lost because of lack of cold weather gear, or the new Indian battle rifle that still doesn’t work. You will never fail to find horror stories about Indians entrusted with technical work.
    Both India and Pakistan are horrifyingly inept basket cases, but India has a handful of officers who know what they’re doing, and it has far more people overall. Pakistan’s equivalent population of competant soldiers were terrorists.

  205. Whiskey says: • Website

    Trump in full cuck mode I see. Open borders as wide as they will go.

    Pretty much every White man with a daughter is a natural born cuck, gotta placate Daddy’s little princess who is the natural enemy of the average White man. And when called racist nearly all White men fold into a quivering mass of fetal position cuck dom.

    Cucks got to cuck. And Trump is the cuck in chief.

    White peoples just became the minority. Expect 80 million new instant non White Americans next year.

    You will pay and pay and pay.

    • Replies: @Dr Van Nostrand
  206. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @El Dato

    People who know history see a reminder that you may not be interested in foreigners, but foreigners may be interested in you.

    Please explain.

  207. anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hans

    Why of course, I can certainly see how deep state operator teams funded with black budget dollars and willing to kill dozens of civilians in false flag terror attacks would have the deepest respect for the stipulations of the Mundt Act. Swiper, no swiping!

  208. Lot says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Forcing the large Chinese minority to adopt Thai names and language in the 19th century was a wise move, Malays probably should have done the same.

    It is harder to force a language on a minority group now because the internet and satellite TV lets every little language group stay in a bubble.

    Kids naturally want to speak the majority language, but adults usually have to be forced.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  209. Anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kronos

    “colossal mistake“
    Really?

    • Replies: @Kronos
  210. @Flip

    Margaret Meade claimed the Samoan women, ah, does anyone still believe anything she said anymore?

  211. DB Cooper says:
    @J.Ross

    “They lost in 62 and in subsequent incidents… ”

    Is this what Times of India said?

    “territorial encroachment further west in the Himalayas?”

    It is the shithole India that is the land expansionist because it is a Raj wannabe. You must be drinking too much cow piss.

    Here is a selected list of the India’s territorial encroachment since its creation in 1947:

    1947 Annexation of Kashmir:
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/06/indias-shame/
    http://thediplomat.com/2015/08/kashmirs-young-rebels/
    1949 Annexation of Manipur:
    http://www.tehelka.com/manipurs-merger-with-india-was-a-forced-annexation/
    http://www.passblue.com/2017/09/05/in-lush-manipur-women-work-for-peace-as-militarization-marches-on/
    1949 Annexation of Tripura:
    http://www.crescent-online.net/2009/09/the-myths-of-one-nation-and-one-hinduism-in-india-zawahir-siddique-2316-articles.html
    1951 Annexation of South Tibet:
    http://kanglaonline.com/2011/06/khathing-the-taking-of-tawang/
    http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article2582.html
    http://chasfreeman.net/india-pakistan-and-china/
    1954 Annexation of Nagaland:
    http://morungexpress.com/desire-nagas-live-separate-nation-deserved/
    http://nagalandmusings.blogspot.com/2013/01/indias-untold-genocide-of-nagas.html
    1954 Attempt annexation of Sikkim and Bhutan (Failed):
    http://redbarricade.blogspot.hk/2013/01/twisted-truth.html
    1961 Annexation of Goa:
    http://www.ruleoflaw.org.au/the-annexation-of-goa/
    http://www.historytoday.com/richard-cavendish/goa-falls-indian-troops
    http://goa-invasion-1961.blogspot.in/2013/09/india-pirated-goa-china-is-regaining_16.html
    1962 Annexation of Kalapani, Nepal:
    http://www.eurasiareview.com/07032012-indian-hegemony-in-nepal-oped/
    http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1239348
    http://www.sharnoffsglobalviews.com/land-disputes-116/
    1962 Aggression against China:
    http://gregoryclark.net/redif.html
    http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/news-events/podcasts/renewed-tension-indiachina-border-whos-blame
    1971 Annexation of Turtuk, Pakistan:
    http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/suddenly-indian
    1972 Annexation of Tin Bigha, Bangladesh:
    http://www.dhakatribune.com/op-ed/2014/feb/20/killing-fields
    1975 Annexation of Sikkim (the whole country):
    http://nepalitimes.com/issue/35/Nation/9621#.UohjPHQo6LA
    http://www.passblue.com/2015/07/22/a-small-himalayan-kingdom-remembers-its-lost-independence/

    http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Indian-hegemonism-drags-Himalayan-kingdom-into-oblivion
    http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/annexation-of-sikkim-by-india-was-not-legal-wangchuk-namgyal/1/391498.html
    1983 (Aborted) Attempted invasion of Mauritius:
    http://thediplomat.com/2013/03/when-india-almost-invaded-mauritius/
    1987 Invasion of Sri Lanka
    http://www.asiantribune.com/node/63316
    1990 (Failed) First Attempted annexation of Bhutan:
    http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/07/world/india-based-groups-seek-to-disrupt-bhutan.html
    2006 Annexation of Duars, Bhutan:
    http://wangchasangey.blogspot.in/2015/11/different-kind-of-anxieties-on.html#comment-form
    2013 Annexation of Moreh, Myanmar:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nehginpao-kipgen/easing-indiamyanmar-borde_b_4633040.html
    2017 Aggression against China:
    http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2017/07/06/sikkim-stand-off-china-india-collide-himalayas/
    http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2102555/indias-china-war-round-two
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/china-india-standoff-modi-has-bitten-off-more-than-he-can-chew/
    2017 (Failed) Second Attempted annexation of Bhutan:
    http://wangchasangey.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-strategy-behind-india-doklam.html
    http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2106709/india-must-find-face-saving-pretext-and-withdraw-doklam
    2018 (Thwarted) Attempt invasion of the Maldives
    https://www.ft.com/content/332a5b1a-1155-11e8-8cb6-b9ccc4c4dbbb
    https://thewire.in/223916/keep-off-maldives-yameen-government-tells-indian-military/?utm_source=alsoread

  212. Lot says:
    @J.Ross

    You prefer the House GOP make a symbolic and futile demand for a recorded vote they will lose, for a law that the Senate will never even officially consider or vote on?

    I want powerless house GOP members fundraising and campaigning to retake it in 2020, not wasting their time pretending to oppose Nancy’s DOA-in-Senate crap.

    In any event, gay marriage is not a winning issue for the right. We win when the news cycle is focused on crime, Muslim terrorism, and mass migration chaos. And rustbelt specific: China trade issues.

    Trump needs 63-64% of the white vote in 2020. By definition, that means a ton of people who are left of center and who voted for Obama.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  213. AndrewR says:
    @El Dato

    Probably not but Obama knew he would suffer no costs from throwing that in there. He’s truly sociopathic.

  214. @anonymous

    Good article; too bad it’s nearly 20 years old. We need an update for sure.

    Black drivers speed twice as much as white drivers, and speed at reckless levels even more.

    IME, this wildly understates the case. Blacks are about 25% of my metro area, and maybe nine times out of ten when I see a driver pull a really dangerous stunt in traffic it’s a negro. So I’m sort of unsympathetic to their incessant bleating.

    DOJ tried to block the release of the report

    Well there’s one thing which hasn’t changed. Even if our president were cogent, coherent and consistent, the fact remains that the Long March through the Institutions preceded him by decades and it would take decades more to clear out the ‘swamp’ even if we had electoral winds behind us. Well, years anyway. Government is pretty much the enemy, from top to bottom.

  215. @Forbes

    I bet even Jussie Smollett feels that way…

    I guarantee you he does. That man’s tears were real, I tell ya!

    BTW, in the Chicago Sun-Times yesterday: Lawyers for Jussie Smollett asked a federal judge Tuesday to dismiss a lawsuit demanding the “Empire” actor pay back more than $130,000 city officials say was spent on the investigation into the alleged hoax crime.

    I say we need a trial. But then this is Chicago we’re talking about.

  216. @Lot

    In any event, gay marriage is not a winning issue for the right.

    I would think that gay reparations is. No one said anything about that before, and now it’s one house and a signature away from being the law of the land?

    What do they have in store for us next?

    • Replies: @Lot
  217. Dissident says:
    @Jake

    Jewish bankers have been indispensable to the WASP Elites since Oliver Cromwell.

    In a comment from October 2018, Unz reader Thorfinnsson wrote,

    I am not a fan of the Jews but their role in finance is exaggerated. Of America’s five largest banks, only one has a Jewish CEO (Goldman Sachs). Three of them in fact have Irish CEOs.

    The United States was not under Jewish control when the Federal Reserve System was planned and formed. While representatives of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co were present at the Jekyll Island meeting, most of the representatives were from Morgan and Rockefeller.

    Back to Jake,

    And those Jewish bankers did not invest in the Brit WASP Empire and then the American WASP Empire to be nice guys, nor just to make a fair profit.

    How many bankers– Jewish, gentile or anything else– have done business “to be nice guys” or even “just to make a fair profit”? Haven’t bankers, like most businessmen once you reach a certain level, generally been known to have been pretty greedy, even ruthless?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  218. The territories demarcated as Canada and Mexico, for example, possess valuable natural resources

    Unfortunately, they also possess Canadians and Mexicans.

  219. Lot says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    It isn’t gay reparations, it is making a retroactive change to federal recognition of state gay marriages for a tax credit.

    Calling that “gay reparations” is tendentious, and only the most friendly conservative media will ever adopt that frame. And friendly media could instead be pushing our better issues that don’t require tendentious framing. Like, say, Liz Warren has an actual reparations proposal that isn’t $67 million but tens of billions. And she includes every single ethnic group but whitey, even all the Asian groups with much higher wealth.

    • Replies: @Dissident
    , @TTSSYF
  220. Lot says:
    @Jake

    “WASP Empire is Anglo-Zionist Empire. Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy, and unless it is rejected, a Judaizing heresy always produces pro-Jewish culture. Jewish bankers have been indispensable to the WASP Elites since Oliver Cromwell.”

  221. R.G. Camara says: • Website
    @William Badwhite

    I would not be surprised if a super-majority of today’s male sportswriters are the products of divorce.–especially divorces occurring between the ages of 8-12. The neediness to be beloved by these larger-than-life heroes seems to be a tranference; 8-12 is the prime age range for boys to get heavily into sports worship –buying baseball cards, memorizing stats, playing little league, reading up on sports history—so when Dad is kicked out by Mom the boys dive deeper into sports worship to cover up for needing a male figure in their life.

    Bill Simmons is the poster child for this. Product of divorce, he’s quite pathetic, despite all his success.

    • Replies: @William Badwhite
  222. J.Ross says:
    @Dissident

    In fact, you know who’s very heavily overrepresented in American finance, and especially at the Federal Reserve? Irishmen.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  223. R.G. Camara says: • Website
    @syonredux

    I think it was a combination of small cities, no government dole, and plenty of space. Poor folks shuffled off the to country to become dirt farmers rather than clog up the streets.

  224. Kyle says:
    @Nick Diaz

    If immigration was limited everything would cost more, except for housing and rent in “good school districts.”

  225. Dissident says:
    @Lot

    I see your point but…

    It isn’t gay reparations, it is making a retroactive change to federal recognition of state gay marriages for a tax credit.

    What about individuals who underwent so-called sex-reassignment surgery before it was eligible for coverage under Medicare, Medicaid, the military or a given private medical insurer?

    What about individuals who can claim to have been harmed or incurred undue expenses as a direct result of now-repealed anti-Sodomy laws?

    Where does it end?

    Calling that “gay reparations” is tendentious,

    As tendentious as having the State sanction any same-sex relationship as marriage? (Which throughout human history, across all lands and cultures, had always been limited in definition to one male and one or more females.)

    As tendentious (and manifestly, objectively false and pernicious) as asserting that any form or expression of homosexuality can ever be considered equivalent to normative heterosexuality?

    Once society did that…

    • Replies: @Lot
  226. @Walsh2

    What’s funny is that for a long time the press inaccurately referred to prominent white nationalists as white supremacists when, if anything, they were East Asian and Ashkenazi supremacists by the underlying logic of the articles mentioning them. Now they’ve quickly latched on to white nationalism as a juicy scare phrase without attempting to differentiate it from previous phrases. It’s not any scarier, it’s just a novel term to a broader audience, a marketing innovation. People want an explanation for 2016 in a sound byte, so anybody to the right of Hillary, no matter what their complexion, is a white nationalist. But it will linger on like the latest politically correct term for blacks or gender-ambiguous persons, and within a few years it will be generally accepted that we have always been at war with white nationalism.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  227. @eah

    With the twittering twit in the White House having inaugurated a new age of government by social media, perhaps I may be permitted to add my two cents, in kind:

    #DoneWithTrump.

  228. @eah

    That was absolutely insane. MSNBC needs to issue a full apology and retraction, and that stupid woman needs to be fired immediately.

    On the other hand, I have to wonder why these Leftist shills seem so intent upon goading and provoking normal white Americans into finally taking for real those actions which they’ve been (falsely) accused of taking for decades. Is it some kind of death wish? Do they really think they’ll emerge victorious if they pick that fight? Or is it the fact that shilling is all that they know, and they have no awareness of the dangers of this tense political situation?

    My money is on the latter. These people take for granted the safety and security of the society they are busily attacking, and they have no comprehension of the floodwaters that are about to overwhelm them.

  229. Jack D says:
    @Anon

    You start out with a completely wrong premise – “Jeff Bezos is a Jew”, so everything that follows is also wrong. This is like making a math mistake in step 1 of a 20 step problem. No matter what you do later on, you’re still going to get the wrong answer.

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  230. Lot says:
    @Dissident

    While all valid points, they are also all beside the larger point: talk like that doesn’t get you 64% of the white vote. And it gets less than half among under 40s, white collar suburban ladies, people with gay kids or favorite siblings, and actual or imaginary gay BFFs.

  231. Jack D says:
    @J.Ross

    Yes, that’s the logical fallacy which leads anti-Semites around here to proclaim all sorts of good faithful Christians (Bezos, Krystof, many others) to be Jews. “All Jews are privileged” is not the same thing as “All privileged people are Jews.”

    The other thing is that folks around here are upset when POC’s complain about “white privilege” but they themselves whine about “Jew privilege” . This is the mirror image of the situation in the mass media where “white privilege” is a thing but “Jew privilege” is not. You have to be consistent – either “white privilege” AND “Jew privilege” both exist or they both don’t. You can’t pick and choose to suit your agenda.

    • Replies: @peterike
    , @Dissident
    , @J.Ross
  232. @Jack D

    You start out with a completely wrong premise – “Jeff Bezos is a Jew”, so everything that follows is also wrong. This is like making a math mistake in step 1 of a 20 step problem. No matter what you do later on, you’re still going to get the wrong answer.

    That is obviously not the case, as should be clear to anyone with a smattering of logical ability. It is always possible to take a differently determined path to an answer which happens to be correct but for the wrong reasons. This can occur even in pure math; in the heuristics of social life, it happens all the time. Much that you might conclude about Bezos by assuming he is a Jew is likely to be true, even though he isn’t.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @Jack D
  233. eah says:
    @eah

  234. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    Forcing the large Chinese minority to adopt Thai names and language in the 19th century was a wise move

    What was wise about it?

    • Replies: @Lot
  235. @Intelligent Dasein

    Bezos is extremely non-Jewish. He’s a Cowboy-American.

  236. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @J.Ross

    In fact, you know who’s very heavily overrepresented in American finance, and especially at the Federal Reserve? Irishmen.

    There is some speculation that the Irish are the lost tribe of Israel.

    • Replies: @Lot
  237. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @WowJustWow

    if anything, they were East Asian and Ashkenazi supremacists by the underlying logic of the articles mentioning them.

    Please explain.

    • Replies: @WowJustWow
  238. @El Dato

    Thanks. The brain hack possibilities and neurological conditioning look scary indeed.

    But I still don’t get it, that Senator Cruz’ and R. Epstein’s conversation about Google manipulating the 2016 elections big scale has not caused big controversies, at least in the alternative media world.

    What is the reason? Is Epstein so far off? Is it that his argument is not sound? Is Epstein the reason, or Cruz, or what? The summer heat? Trump’s cooperation with Cambridge Analytica? Is it just about the same what Google and Cambridge Analytica did?

  239. Kronos says:
    @El Dato

    The Great Wall of China was partially successful. The big problem was that it deflected Mongolians into Eastern Europe.

  240. TTSSYF says:
    @Lot

    Tax credits for marriage were designed to promote family stability for raising children (yes, there are a lot of heterosexual couples who never have children, either by choice or bad luck, but good policy is not based on individual circumstances — it is necessarily based on generalizations about populations). Marriage and the corresponding tax benefits were never intended to be for two people of the same sex. By extending them to same-sex couples even going forward, to say nothing of retroactively, is grossly unfair to all of the single people out there with the misfortune to have never found a spouse. And how about the brother and sister I know who have shared an apartment and living expenses for years? Why should they be denied the benefits of tax credits when their gay neighbors next door receive them? Maybe they should get “married”, too. After all — whose business is it whether they’re having sex or not?

    We’re becoming like Gary Larsen’s Professor Liebowitz cartoon, where nearly everyone is holding a duck. Let’s all grab hold of a duck and, in the name of fairness, do away with ALL marriage tax benefits.

  241. @Charles Erwin Wilson 3

    Not, on average, as much as Jeff Bezos loves cowboy country. He’s basically the end of a Western movie where the townspeople talk about how, now that they have law and order finally, someday they’ll get electricity and their descendants will grow up to do amazing things with electrical wires and maybe one of them will someday become the richest man in the world.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @JMcG
  242. @sayless

    My Chicago cousin, the big handsome charismatic ballplayer, almost always talked his way out of traffic tickets, no matter how falling-down drunk he was or how catastrophic his crash, such as the time he decided to make a u-turn on Clark St., rammed into a fire hydrant and projected his other cousin thru the windshield. I, the annoyingly logical nerd, almost always wound up getting a ticket the few times I was pulled over, always sober.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Lot
  243. peterike says:
    @Jack D

    You have to be consistent – either “white privilege” AND “Jew privilege” both exist or they both don’t. You can’t pick and choose to suit your agenda.

    Lol. You’re reaching Corvinus levels of mendacious yet abjectly stupid commentary.

  244. Corvinus says:
    @peterike

    “Lol!! Just one of the many howlers in your latest mental vomit.”

    Since you can’t dispute facts, you turn to your old standby…ad hominem. How many bottles per day do you quaff of that cheap swill?

  245. Corvinus says:
    @Steve Sailer

    “My Chicago cousin, the big handsome charismatic ballplayer…”

    Who would that be?

  246. @syonredux

    The comparison is not fair. And you clearly seem to prefer your own taste. – How egotistical!

    (No, no I didn’t mean what I have been saying, I’ve just been following the herd).

  247. @Corvinus

    Due in large part to poverty, unemployment, and gang violence. In other words, environmental.

    I will just point out you’re seemingly saying American blacks commit, on average, more violent crimes — as in, they’re more violent — because, among other things, they’re more violent.

    This way of thinking is also flawed. You don’t know why blacks commit more homicides. No one does. There are only hypothesis.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  248. bomag says:
    @istevefan

    It would be like printing money!

  249. bomag says:
    @Corvinus

    Pretty turgid stuff, even by your standards, Corvinus.

  250. Dissident says:
    @Jack D

    On the point you made in your first paragraph, I have long found it amusing how many non-Jews are assumed to be or even insisted to be Jews by antiSemites. (The flip-side of that coin, of course, are all the Jews that are all-too-eager in claiming renowned and respected figures as Jews.)

    Now, on to your second paragraph…

    You have to be consistent – either “white privilege” AND “Jew privilege” both exist or they both don’t.

    First, I do not see why, logically, one form of privilege cannot exist independently of another. Moreover, I’m afraid that I see evidence for the existence of Jewish privilege that I do not see for the existence of White privilege.

    [MORE]

    To be clear, I do not necessarily mean in the matter of mere over-achievement on the part of Jews and overrepresentation by them in intellectual and political movements. That much, it would seem to me, may very well be adequately explained by a combination of such factors as high IQ; high concentration in urban areas; and a culture that places an especially high value on academic achievement and general success.

    But what happens when anyone tries to so much as mention the concept of Jewish privilege and question whether it may exist? Ditto for the mere phenomenon of Jewish over-representation in positions of power and influence. Such an individual will almost certainly be summarily unpersoned and deplatformed, will he not? Is this reality itself not strong evidence for the existence of a phenomenon that it would not be unreasonable to characterize as a form of Jewish privilege?

    Are you aware of the role that the ADL— in their partnership with such major platforms as Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Twitter– plays in determining the paramaters of what is considered acceptable public speech?

    What happens to any public office holder or aspirant who so much as questions the power and influence that the Zionist State of Israel– a foreign entity— and its lobby wield over United States politics and policy?

    Now consider the corresponding present reality with regard to White gentiles. If you follow this blog at all, you must have at least some degree of awareness of how prevalent, accepted, fashionable and even encouraged all kinds of expressions and manifestations of contempt, ridicule, degradation, hostility and even sheer, unmasked malice toward Whites has become.

    You can’t pick and choose to suit your agenda.

    I have certainly seen more than a few instances of antiSemites doing just that. But let me return to the sentence of yours that I quoted at the beginning of this post,

    You have to be consistent – either “white privilege” AND “Jew privilege” both exist or they both don’t.

    That sounds remarkably similar to my challenge to many of the Jews in comfortable positions of power: I wish you would knock it off already with the sanctimonious scolding about White privilege and diversity. But if you won’t, if you insist upon persisting in such obnoxious self-righteousness, then, at the very least, you’d better stop stifling any discussion of Jewish over-representation and whether Jewish privilege may exist. You can’t expect to continue to have it both ways without facing– and bringing upon all Jews, everywhere– a considerable backlash.

  251. Beliavsky says:
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    @MikeatMikedotMike
    Do you need a safe space where no one will call out Trump’s racism? Pathetic. Attacking genuine racism from a white/black/brown person is not the same as hating whites/blacks/browns in general.

  252. Beliavsky says:

    Steve refuses to see Trump’s rhetoric as incitement. Bret Stephens explains that it is in the NYT: When you start your campaign by describing (disproportionately Hispanic) illegal immigrants as a class as “rapists”, doesn’t that increase the chance that someone will engage in a mass shooting of Hispanics? Trump is right that a country must defend its borders, but he needs to be less of a demagogue.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/08/opinion/trump-el-paso-shooting-nationalism.html
    Trump’s Rhetoric and Conservative Denial

    “incitement takes many forms. In June 2018, Trump tweeted the following: “Democrats are the problem. They don’t care about crime and want illegal immigrants, no matter how bad they may be, to pour into and infest our Country, like MS-13. They can’t win on their terrible policies, so they view them as potential voters!”

    The tweet (noted by my colleague Frank Bruni in a recent column) is significant precisely because it is almost forgotten. It does not even rank in a top 10 list of Trumpian outrages. And yet it’s all there: The imputation of bad faith to his political opponents. The conspiracy theory about “potential voters.” The sneaking conflation of illegal immigrants with violent gang members.”

  253. @Steve Sailer

    “Bezos” is a name that, to persons not educated about languages, can give the casual person the impression of Jewry. (A similar example is “Lyng” – a Scandinavian surname most assume to be Oriental.)

    In Bezos’ case, his wealth beyond the dreams of avarice reinforces the logical supposition by many that he is probably a Jew.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Jack D
  254. Jack D says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    The first rule of holes is to stop digging. Anon didn’t say that Bezos acts AS IF he were Jewish, he said that Bezos IS Jewish. This is 100% wrong and there’s no point in defending the indefensible. Admit that Anon is deluded and move on.

    Thinking that people who aren’t Jewish are really Jewish is not an accidental mistake. It’s one that anti-Semites (and mainly anti-Semites) make over and over. If I had a nickel for every non-Jew labeled as Jewish on unz.com I’d have a lot of nickels. No one mistakenly labels people as Greek Orthodox or Armenian. It’s really meant as a form of insult or disqualifier – this person is no longer “one of us”, he belongs to an alien tribe that we don’t like. He is acting in a diabolical manner and since we “know” that Jews are diabolical, therefore he must be Jewish.

    • Agree: Lot, Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  255. @R.G. Camara

    Interesting theory, thanks. There is an earnest patheticness about lots of them. It would make sense that they’re often trying to impress some male “father figure”.

  256. Lot says:
    @Anonymous

    “What was wise about it?”

    Thailand has had far less ethnic conflict between its brown and yellow populations, and more intermarriage, as compared to Malaysia and Indonesia.

  257. Lot says:
    @Steve Sailer

    I’ve been pulled over for speeding twice and given warnings and no ticket. Both times it was a surprise and I was going more than 15 over.

    I was very polite as I normally am, but did not try to talk my way out of anything, giving short answers only when spoken to. I only have one actual speeding ticket, so I am 2/3 on the “polite and quiet” approach.

  258. Lot says:
    @syonredux

    “If Anglo-America must have more people, I would rather have more of this”

    The Ukraine conflict has resulted in some real cuties migrating here.

  259. Lot says:
    @Anonymous

    There is some speculation that the Irish are the lost tribe of Israel.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  260. Elsewhere says:
    @sayless

    I think that police that deal with a lot of black crime really do cut whites slack on traffic offenses. An officer in the Chicago who caught me going 50 in a 35 mph zone (which is a section of road with mostly a 45 mph limit), but he didn’t want to ticket me for speeding. He kept trying to think of a more minor offense to charge me with. It was a bit embarrassing.

    In a rural area, on an interstate, cops have not hesitated to pull me over and ticket me for 80 in a 70, with no warnings given.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  261. @Lot

    Does Guinness have a category for largest dry erase board?

    OMG, They do!!

    https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/430314-largest-whiteboard

  262. @Beliavsky

    What is the problem with “racism” as you apparently define it?

    Also, Bret Stephens…that’s hilarious!

  263. Corvinus says:
    @adreadline

    “You don’t know why blacks commit more homicides. No one does. There are only hypothesis.”

    Are you new here? Of course we know why blacks are murderers–it’s the DNA. Haven’t you heard of human biodiversity? Gee whiz, get with the program…

    • Replies: @adreadline
    , @Jack D
  264. Anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Not, on average, as much as Jeff Bezos loves cowboy country. He’s basically the end of a Western movie where the townspeople talk about how, now that they have law and order finally, someday they’ll get electricity and their descendants will grow up to do amazing things with electrical wires and maybe one of them will someday become the richest man in the world.

    Steve loves Jeff Bezos.

  265. Anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Autochthon

    In Bezos’ case, his wealth beyond the dreams of avarice reinforces the logical supposition by many that he is probably a Jew.

    He also appears to feel little loyalty to the American people.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  266. Anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Beliavsky

    Steve refuses to see Trump’s rhetoric as incitement.

    If it is “incitement” (to what?), is it not justified? The country is under invasion and the native people are being dispossessed.

  267. Anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    This is 100% wrong and there’s no point in defending the indefensible.

    But is it really wrong?

    Let’s look past “formalities” and focus on substance. Does Bezos identify more with Jews or with flyover Whites? Are his political preferences and actions more in line with those of Jews or with those of Christians and Muslims? After all, what is more important than political practices and affiliation in categorizing someone?

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  268. Jack D says:
    @Beliavsky

    That fellow in Texas must have been a slow burn because Trump said (truthfully) that some Mexicans were rapists (and some are good people) over 4 years ago. When Obama said that white cops were shooting too many blacks, somebody in Dallas went out and shot a bunch of cops within a few days – THAT’s a direct arrow of causation, but Obama didn’t get blamed at all.

    Trump didn’t shoot anyone. He didn’t ask his followers to kill anyone. This is just an attempt by the Dems to make political hay out of a tragedy. Never let a tragedy go to waste. Now maybe this works with low information and excitable Dem voters but I think you aren’t going to find a fertile field to sow this bullshit around here.

    Anyway, this “outrage” is only going to last a week and next week the Dems and the press will find something else that Trump did to be outraged against. After a while you experience outrage fatigue because whatever Trump does or says or doesn’t do or say turns the Dem outrage meter up to 11.

    • Agree: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  269. Jack D says:
    @Autochthon

    What Jewish name does Bezos sound like or resemble in any way shape or form? It sounds kind of Greek because it IS Greek. Bezos BTW is not ethnically Greek. His birth name was Jorgensen (don’t tell me that THAT sounds Jewish too?) and Bezos was his step dad.

    People keep twisting themselves into pretzels to defend Anon when the Occam’s Razor explanation is that Anon is an idiot. To a person not educated in ANYTHING, everyone that they don’t like is automatically a “Jew”. No evidence needed.

  270. Jack D says:
    @Elsewhere

    I’ve been given breaks by cops in completely white areas too. It has nothing to do with blacks. Not everything is about black people or white privilege. Sometimes the cop just wants to give you a break. Once on a rural stretch of the NJ Turnpike the cop gave me a “no seatbelt” ticket (0 points) instead of a speeding ticket. State makes the same amount of $ but why should he make the insurance company rich? Another time a cop in Wyoming (I didn’t think they HAD a speed limit) gave me a warning for going 85 in a 75 (I think they since raised it to 80). Neither of these were in areas with a lot of blacks. There are maybe 3 black people in Wyoming.

  271. @Corvinus

    I know about human biodiversity. Evidently, you don’t think it explains things satisfactorily. Good — I don’t buy it wholesale either. You aren’t doing your worldview any favors, however, by being tautological and by asserting American blacks (or any population for that matter) are violent (or better at math/more musically inclined/worse drivers) because of this and that.

    Unless you’ve studied the matter and done controlled experiments, you can’t claim cause and effect. Though, of course, you can favor any hypothesis you wish. I’m interested in any evidence that supports the view any population at all is more prone to commit homicides due in any part to poverty or unemployment (or being discriminated against, being marginalized, etc.).

  272. Jack D says:
    @Corvinus

    Must be something. The homicide rate is higher than Western European or E. Asian countries in every single majority black country. A lot of these places have vastly different cultures from each other (Jamaica is not much like Lesotho otherwise) but they all have relatively high homicide rates compared to Western European or E. Asians. And by relatively, I mean 100x. The homicide rate in HK is .3/ 100K and in Trinidad it’s 30. But, you’re probably right that it’s just a coincidence or something and has NOTHING whatsoever to do with DNA. Maybe it’s something in the water.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  273. Anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    That fellow in Texas must have been a slow burn

    What is a “slow burn”?

  274. syonredux says:
    @Corvinus

    “Europeans. Sadly, we’re not getting many of them these days…”

    To be more specific, Enlightenment thinkers from France and England, along with Roman and Greek legal traditions.

    Yes, Europeans from various European countries….

    Of course, those values can be easily embraced by the human population

    Of course, certain races don’t want to embrace European culture:

    “Seems fairly accurate to me….”

    Indeed. Ethnic mixing of two different groups.

    Two closely related groups….

    Nothing inherently wrong here.

    With one European group interbreeding with another European group, absolutely…

    But the fact remains that Franklin did not view the Germans favorably.

    They’re not as good as the English, but he felt that they could be absorbed…..And he was proven correct:

    Yet I am not for refusing entirely to admit them [Germans] into our Colonies: all that seems to be necessary is, to distribute them more equally, mix them with the English, establish English Schools where they are now too thick settled, and take some care to prevent the practice lately fallen into by some of the Ship Owners, of sweeping the German Gaols to make up the number of their Passengers.I say I am not against the Admission of Germans in general, for they have their Virtues, their industry and frugality is exemplary; They are excellent husbandmen and contribute greatly to the improvement of a Country.

    https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-04-02-0173

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    , @Anonymous
  275. Kronos says:
    @Anon

    Were there any upsides? It’s been a “all pain no gain” arrangement since the beginning. Can you name any race-relation positives of the last 70 years?

    Besides middle class blacks being able to escape their underclass cousins.

  276. Corvinus says:
    @Jack D

    “Must be something. The homicide rate is higher than Western European or E. Asian countries in every single majority black country.”

    Indeed, in large part due to environmental factors. You do realize that the non-hispanic white homicide rate in the southern part of our fine nation is higher than in the northern part. Must be something, indeed.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285267

    And what about the United States compared to the rest of the world when it comes to deaths from gun violence. We are the tops! Now, are there examples of nations who had similar rates, then enacted laws and witnessed a change? South Africa passed its Firearm Control Act in 2000 — banned automatic rifles, instituted background checks, permits and licenses. In the next five years, there was a 13.6% decline on average per year in gun-related firearm deaths. Austria passed a similar law and experienced similar results a few years before South Africa’s legislation. Interestingly enough, those nations who are far worse to live in from a conflict standpoint-Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Iraq, Somalia, South Sudan, Somalia, Yemen–would have outside numbers of gun-based violence. Apparently, that is not the case.

    True dat, gun control advocates would claim that the proliferation of easily available and private firearms enable violent crimes. On the other hand, damn straight that gun rights advocates would point to the much lower violent crime rate in a similarly governed and wealthy nation. But the propensity for a person to murder, from my humble opinion, is largely due to nurture, not nature.

    “But, you’re probably right that it’s just a coincidence or something and has NOTHING whatsoever to do with DNA. Maybe it’s something in the water.”

    You mean like the 2-repeat allele of the MAOA gene?

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @adreadline
    , @syonredux
  277. @Anonymous

    [graph of IQ distribution by race]

  278. @Corvinus

    And what about the United States compared to the rest of the world when it comes to deaths from gun violence. We are the tops! Now, are there examples of nations who had similar rates, then enacted laws and witnessed a change? South Africa

    South Africa, with a population of around 60 million, reportedly had more homicides than all of the United States in 2017.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

    I happen to live in the country with the most deaths from gun violence per year in the world. Recently, proposals to make it legal to carry firearms have gained traction. The effects are yet to be seen.

  279. J.Ross says:
    @syonredux

    Those pyramids should be brightly colored and festooned with flowers and plants.

  280. JMcG says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Cowboys don’t ditch their wives for adventuresses.

  281. syonredux says:
    @Corvinus

    According to the FBI SHR data, in 2014 there were 6,095 black homicide victims in the United States. The homicide rate among black victims in the United States was 16.38 per 100,000. For that year, the overall national homicide rate was 4.19 per 100,000. For whites, the national homicide rate was 2.52 per 100,000

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:d82wemPayt8J:vpc.org/studies/blackhomicide17.pdf+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    In the UK:

    The Metropolitan Police Service is one of the few police forces which has collected statistics on gang rape. Filmmaker Sorious Samura compiled 29 such incidents involving young people from January 2006 to March 2009, and found that, of 92 people convicted, 66 were black or mixed race. Samura said he found it “impossible to ignore the fact that such a high proportion were committed by black and mixed-race young men”.[11]

    In June 2010, through a Freedom of Information Act request, The Sunday Telegraph obtained statistics on accusations of crime broken down by race from the Metropolitan Police Service.[n 2] The figures showed that the majority of males who were accused of violent crimes in 2009–10 were black. Of the recorded 18,091 such accusations against males, 54 percent accused of street crimes were black; for robbery, 58 percent; and for gun crimes, 67 percent.[27]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_Kingdom

  282. Anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @syonredux

    There was one thinker from around that time who wrote of the fortuitousness that a large percentage of the people in the colonies or new USA were so similar culturally. I think it gets referenced from time to time on this blog. Do you have the quote and author? Was it Franklin?

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @syonredux
  283. @Anonymous

    Jay’s Federalist Paper #2

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  284. J.Ross says:
    @Jack D

    Bezos ticks every stereotypical Jewish box people actually (and legitimately) worry about (massive economic power, market-cornering, market changing, boss from hell, wanting to control politics, corp-woke, using mass media lying to control policy discussion, technology and futurism). Do you think these people are anxious about how often he goes to synagogue? I don’t see this triumphant hairsplitting when the media sells a completely baseless and made up school shooter archetype.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  285. @J.Ross

    Like I’ve said, Jeff Bezos is a Cowboy-American.

    He is Who We Are.

    • Replies: @syonredux
    , @J.Ross
  286. syonredux says:
    @Anonymous

    There was one thinker from around that time who wrote of the fortuitousness that a large percentage of the people in the colonies or new USA were so similar culturally. I think it gets referenced from time to time on this blog. Do you have the quote and author? Was it Franklin?

    It was John Jay:

    With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people–a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.

    Federalist Papers, No. 2

  287. @Anonymous

    Bezos seems pretty obsessed with Texas and New Mexico high plains.

  288. @Anonymous

    In Bezos’ case, his wealth beyond the dreams of avarice reinforces the logical supposition by many that he is probably a Jew.

    You know, Old American types like Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Sam Walton, Getty, Perot, Ford, Morgan, and Vanderbilt have been pretty good at getting rich beyond the dreams of avarice down through American history.

    • Replies: @Dissident
  289. Dissident says:
    @Steve Sailer

    You know, Old American types like Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Sam Walton, Getty, Perot, Ford, Morgan, and Vanderbilt have been pretty good at getting rich beyond the dreams of avarice down through American history.

    Couldn’t Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller and Henry Clay Frick be added to the list of immensely wealthy and powerful American gentiles? No doubt more than a few additional names could as well.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  290. @Dissident

    It’s like a lawyer friend of mine who is part of the Australian Establishment goes nuts when people tell him that Rupert Murdoch must be Jewish because whoever heard of a newspaper baron of British ancestry? “No, my people are really good at making money off the media! It’s an ethnic slur on Brits like myself to say Rupert must be Jewish because he’s great at the media business.”

    • Replies: @syonredux
    , @Jack D
    , @Anonymous
  291. syonredux says:
    @Steve Sailer

    It’s sad how quickly people have forgotten Lord Beaverbrook…..

  292. syonredux says:
    @Steve Sailer

    My favorite Cowboy-American:

    Charles Goodnight (March 5, 1836 – December 12, 1929), also known as Charlie Goodnight, was an American cattle rancher in the American West, perhaps the best known rancher in Texas. He is sometimes known as the “father of the Texas Panhandle.” Essayist and historian J. Frank Dobie said that Goodnight “approached greatness more nearly than any other cowman of history.”[1]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Goodnight

    Learned about him when I was 12 and read James Michener’s Centennial…..

    Say what you will about Michener’s turgid prose and wooden characters, his books are a pretty effective way for bright adolescent boys to swot up on various interesting topics: The Space Program (Space), the American West ( Centennial), Afghanistan (Caravans), etc

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  293. Jack D says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Anti-Semites have a special type of circular logic – it’s “hairsplitting” to protest that Bezos isn’t really Jewish, when he definitely “acts Jewish” . And if you ask them what “acting Jewish” means, it turns out to mean acting like Jeff Bezos.

    • Agree: Dissident
    • LOL: Johann Ricke
  294. @Jack D

    Bezos’s stepdad, from whom he got the name, is a white Cuban anti-Communist who spent his career at the hyper-Jewish center of liberalism: Exxon.

    • Replies: @Dissident
  295. @syonredux

    I’m surprised nobody tries to fill Michener’s niche. He made an enormous amount of money in his day.

    I guess Neal Stephenson is the closest.

  296. syonredux says:
    @Jack D

    Those types never give up. I mean, there are still people out there claiming that FDR was some kind of crypto-Jew ……

    • Replies: @Dissident
    , @Anonymous
  297. Dissident says:
    @syonredux

    I mean, there are still people out there claiming that FDR was some kind of crypto-Jew ……

    Eisenhower and Stalin, too. And many more.

  298. Dissident says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Bezos’s stepdad, from whom he got the name, is a white Cuban anti-Communist who spent his career at the hyper-Jewish center of liberalism: Exxon.

    I wonder what the Bezos stepfather would think of what Jeff has done to the Washington Post.

  299. J.Ross says:
    @Steve Sailer

    He’s a lot closer to the big rancher who owns the town bank and drives the farmers off their smallholdings.

  300. J.Ross says:
    @Jack D

    So give us a word that you would accept, which will embrace these behaviors but be perfectly distinct from religious Judaism, and which you will not ten seconds later decry as a “dog whistle.” You can’t do it because no straw Nazi, no crybaby act, no pavlovian activation in boomers. But the boomers are dying and very few people under a cersin age think that Israel is magic. The old function of Jews (here, all of them) as last-line bullet catchers for the European ruling caste is preserved.

  301. Anonymous[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Thank you.

  302. Anonymous[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer

    It’s like a lawyer friend of mine who is part of the Australian Establishment goes nuts when people tell him that Rupert Murdoch must be Jewish because whoever heard of a newspaper baron of British ancestry? “No, my people are really good at making money off the media!

    An Australian wrote in this forum recently that a lot of Australia’s ruling class is one-eighth Jewish.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  303. Anonymous[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    Anti-Semites have a special type of circular logic – it’s “hairsplitting” to protest that Bezos isn’t really Jewish, when he definitely “acts Jewish”

    Jewishness is an ideology, a state of mind, an attitude toward the world. Consistent with that is the concept of “acting Jewish.”

  304. Anonymous[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @syonredux

    Those types never give up. I mean, there are still people out there claiming that FDR was some kind of crypto-Jew ……

    There was a large and dynamic Jewish population in the Netherlands. It is not implausible that FDR had some Jewish ancestry.

    But these posts of yours and of others are all pot calling kettle black. Jews in general distinguish themselves for being obsessive and attuned to who is Jewish and who isn’t. The “Who’s a Jew?” concept was coined by Jews to describe this very tendency in themselves.

    And that’s before we even get into all the ways they actively mark Jews from non-Jews: kippah, male genital mutilation, mezuzah, teflin, dietary rules.

    • Replies: @syonredux
  305. syonredux says:
    @Anonymous

    Those types never give up. I mean, there are still people out there claiming that FDR was some kind of crypto-Jew ……

    There was a large and dynamic Jewish population in the Netherlands. It is not implausible that FDR had some Jewish ancestry.

    “Not implausible” is a far distance from “likely” and “probable.”To the best of my knowledge, no one has found any solid evidence for FDR possessing even the slightest amount of Jewish ancestry, let alone being some kind of crypto-Jew.

  306. syonredux says:
    @Anonymous

    Did he provide detailed genealogies?

  307. @El Dato

    Is this even true for Hispanics?

    Of course, not.

  308. Anon7 says:
    @Anonymous

    The National Debt. And what have we bought with it? Certainly not infrastructure or anything useful.

    The most important use of unlimited National Debt is that nobody sets limits on immigration, because so far no one has had to choose between something for Americans (like Social Security or Medicare) and free stuff for immigrants.

    And that choice is coming, you’d better believe it, based on the fact that EVERY Democrat candidate thinks illegal immigrants should receive free healthcare just like American citizens.

  309. @Whiskey

    “we are DOOMED, DOOMED, DOOMED!” Looks like Whiskey has gone full Ann Coulter on Trump…never go full Ann Coulter.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments are moderated by iSteve, at whim.


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?