The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
NYT: Whites' "False Fears" Actually Not So False
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From the New York Times:

‘Overrun,’ ‘Outbred,’ ‘Replaced’: Why Ethnic Majorities Lash Out Over False Fears

By Max Fisher and Amanda Taub
April 30, 2019

… Many whites welcome pluralism and multiculturalism. But for those who see the decline of white dominance as destabilizing, any increase in the minority population is perceived as an attack.

A growing body of research suggests that this sentiment may be driving significant political change in the United States, which is projected to become “majority minority” — with whites less than half of the population — by 2050.

So these “False Fears” are not so false. In fact, they represent the grand strategy of the Democratic Party to import enough future Democratic voters to turn the U.S. into a one-party country, unified mostly by constantly whipped-up hatred for the former majority.

A study by Maureen Craig of New York University and Jennifer Richeson of Yale University found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes toward Latinos, blacks, and Asian-Americans” and “more automatic pro-white/anti-minority bias.”

The effect disappeared when the authors told participants that whites were expected to remain politically and culturally dominant.

After all, the New York Times runs 10 or 15 opeds per week encouraging nonwhites to defer to the deserved dominance of whites, such as yesterday’s “Fellow Women of Color: It’s Time to Admit That Beckys with Their Lovely Blond Hair Are More Just Beautiful Than Us.”

Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive of immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of President Trump.

In a 2016 poll, 57 percent of whites said “discrimination against whites is as big a problem today as discrimination against blacks and other minorities.”

Clearly, much more lying will be necessary.

 
Hide 131 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Number of Christian Prime Ministers of Japan

    Number of Christian Prime Ministers of Israel

    Percentage of Christians in each country

    • Replies: @Kirt
    Taro Aso, a Christian, was Prime Minister of Japan for a brief time and is currently deputy Prime Minister. There may have been other Christian Prime Ministers of Japan; I don't know. There has of course never been a Christian Prime Minister of Israel. The percentage of Christians in both countries is pretty small - 2% in Israel, 2.3% in Japan.
    , @Crypto-Brythonic
    There have been eight Christian prime ministers of Japan
    , @Blinky Bill
    Asō is the seventh Christian prime minister of Japan, after Takashi Hara, Korekiyo Takahashi, Tetsu Katayama, Ichirō Hatoyama, Masayoshi Ōhira, and his own grandfather Shigeru Yoshida. Would Americans ever vote for a Buddhist President? They did vote for a Muslimist one, Obama.
  2. The question is, when will (((Fisher))) and (((Taub))) write this headline???

    ‘Overrun,’ ‘Outbred,’ ‘Replaced’: Why Israelis Lash Out at Palestinians Over False Fears

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    In their college newspaper.
  3. Fun fact – both authors are vox alumni

  4. I agree with Mr. Sailer that Whites will become a minority and a powerless one.
    Whites will be a hated minority with very high rates of suicide and opioid consumption.
    More and more white women are seen with non white men everyday and this is happening in all the
    White countries except Russia and Ukraine where Indian and other South Asian men date and breed with native women to an extent.
    In Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries almost every Black guy has a White baby moma. You can check the stats for yourself.

    YOU KNOW WHO IS TO BLAME FOR ALL THIS : WHITE MEN THEMSELVES.
    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
    Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.

    Anyway, future of America is a dwindling white population that is that is breeding more and more with Blacks(white women) and Asians(white men).
    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
    We went to the moon in late 60s and now we can’t even decide if Trannies are mentally challneged or not.
    Reperations are being discussed for people who were never enslaved and people who never enslaved anyone are being asked to foot this boondoggle.
    Seriously, West is not even worth saving anymore.
    Be careful while bringing in more White babies to the world.

    • Troll: IHTG
    • Replies: @Oleaginous Outrager
    I'm working to find a suitable use for the word "challneged".


    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
     
    History didn't begin in 1980. Try searching for "Hart Celler". Sure, Reagan's amnesty sucked, but guess what, "amnesty" means they were already here.
    , @indocon
    Totally agree. The 1990 Immigration bill signed by papa Bush started H1B train and doubled family preference, aka chain migration numbers.
    , @L Woods
    Pretty much.
    , @ATBOTL
    "Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea."

    This fact still hasn't sunk in with many boomer conservatives. But we gen Xers remember it and millennials have looked up the facts and know it too. I'm amazed at how boomer conservatives who are new to immigration skepticism retcon the entire past of the immigration debate to imagine that all conservatives were always restrictionists. Gingrich did immense harm to America by stifling immigration reform legislation. Legal immigration could have been dramatically reduced.
    , @L Woods
    And about the white woman/non-white male thing: like the pedastalizers around here, I used to assume that was hyperbolic. After all, the “data” doesn’t really bear out the idea of white women defecting en masse, but that’s because that sort of data doesn’t exist - usually it covers marriage rates, which are deceptive for obvious reasons. All I can say is that the DC area is notorious for its ugly women; the last four times I’ve seen a truly attractive white woman (young, slender, etc), it’s been with not-particularly-attractive brown males. At a certain point, you have to start believing your lying eyes and realize you have zero stake in any of this. None. Don’t be gaslighted for a moment into thinking otherwise. That is, after all one of their oldest tricks, similar to how everyone is allowed to think they’re “middle class.”
    , @anon

    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
     
    wouldn't surprise me
    , @dc.sunsets
    You have a long rant describing a long trend.

    No trend lasts forever.

    Maybe the dead wood of the white forest simply needs to be burned off, along with burning off the invasive species.
  5. I would love to see studies on how well this blatant lying works for TPTB. That is, how often do people believe mendacious headlines that are inconsistent with the text of the piece?

  6. What possible evidence does steve actually have that their is a conscious concerted strategy amongst democrats to win through immigration and racial hatred towards whites? This is all conjecture.

    • LOL: Desiderius
    • Replies: @Rosie

    What possible evidence does steve actually have that their is a conscious concerted strategy amongst democrats to win through immigration and racial hatred towards whites? This is all conjecture.
     
    Foreseeable consequences should be presumed to be intended consequences. Traitors are not entitled to the benefit of the doubt.

    In any event, who cares whether it is a "conscious concerted strategy." The result is the same either way.

    , @J.Ross
    Has anybody ever actually seen a store that sells, let alone home delivers, peet saw? Unthinking suggestible chatterers talk about it all the time but where is the evidence?
    , @anon
    They just had to get the ball rolling with the 1965 Hart-Celler Act. Much of the rest is organic with each new ethnicity/race/religion doing whatever they can to bring their own over here from over there. Kith and kin politics and economics follows. As does the destruction of heritage America ideas and institutions.
  7. This is basically the entire theme of the obsessively data driven book White Shift by Eric Kaufmann. Professor Kaufmann is somewhat Pinker-like in that he comes off very well in interviews and seems immune to attempts to libel or deplatform him.

    • Replies: @Whitey Whiteman III
    He has something else in common with Steven Pinker.

    He was raised in Canada.
  8. Implicit in the analysis is that white fears about other races are false, but other races fears over white dominance is validated.

    • Replies: @Wade
    Funny how that works, isn't it?
    , @KeepPokingTheBear
    Yep, the left & democrats survive on double standards, by judging whites differently to everyone else, no matter the arena.

    Whites fearing a rising minority who openly hate white people - This fear is "unjustified", despite demographic changes proving that it is real, despite places like South Africa & Brazil showing us what the future will be like.

    Non-whites fearing the already established white majority - This fear is "completely justified".

    Despite the vast majority of them IMMIGRATING INTO that white majority by their own choice, despite statistics showing us that blacks & Hispanics commit FAR, FAR more violence, rapes, & murders against whites than the reverse when factoring in population share. Statistics which would be used by the left & democrats to attack white people if they were the other way around, yet whites aren't even allowed to talk about it or we're "racist".

    What a lot of people don't realise is that whites actually had a majority in South Africa at one point in time, & because of the opportunities that this civilization created, blacks kept on flooding in from greater Africa & eventually they became a 90% majority. Going on to STEAL this civilization from the the white man under the guise of "oppression", using a lot of lefty double speak to manipulate the masses & basically encourage the white West to steal it for them by cutting off South Africa with trade & other interactions.

    But yeah, our fears of mass immigration aren't justified...
  9. @Dr. X
    The question is, when will (((Fisher))) and (((Taub))) write this headline???

    ‘Overrun,’ ‘Outbred,’ ‘Replaced’: Why Israelis Lash Out at Palestinians Over False Fears
     

    In their college newspaper.

  10. Y’all made Steve this mad y’all done done it now.

    March of the BoomerEnts incoming SaruPinch.

    • LOL: BB753
  11. Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive of immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of President Trump.

    Less supportive of immigration: Check

    Less supportive of affirmative action: Check

    Less supportive of welfare spending: Check

    Less supportive of health care spending: Check

    More supportive of military spending: What? Are they crazy? We have by far the largest military budget in the world, and it ain’t made one iota of a difference towards the immivasion. In fact the military even seems less than willing to actually patrol our border. What is driving support for more military spending in regards to Whites finding out they are to become a minority?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    "Military spending" is a confused issue because it conflates un-Washingtonian foreign adventurism (which traditionalists oppose but many apoliticals feel obligated to dilatorily support), medical benefits for veterans (which everybody supports), military research (which can be wildly hit or miss), and maintaining stuff we already have (which nobody, not even most congresscritters, thinks of).
    , @ziggurat
    Maybe it's due to military-related jobs. I read somewhere that the Congressional Military Industrial Complex makes sure there are jobs in all 50 states, so that Congressman are encouraged to keep up the funding.
    , @Redneck farmer
    The lefties complaining about the military being racists who kill innocent people of color. You don't know this, and your handle is istevefan?
    , @L Woods
    Yes. If the average white conservative still thinks the military is on his side, there’s not much helping him.
    , @bored identity



    More supportive of military spending: What?

    Are they crazy?

     

    But, but....how we gonna otherwise liberate Vuvuzelians from that bus driver?
  12. Clearly, much more lying will be necessary.

    And they will be lying about more than immigration. The democrats are furiously trying to win back the White working class which they wrote off in 2011. They found out the hard way that they burned some bridges too soon, and it cost them some important Great Lakes states. They know they have to win those back in 2020, so they will end up running a White Judas goat like Biden or Beto to lie to those Whites to make them believe the democrats are the democrats of old. They will downplay their true anti-White animus.

    Let’s hope those Whites don’t fall for it. I am not confident though, because the 2018 midterms showed that the democrats can win when the do such a strategy.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    Let’s hope those Whites don’t fall for it. I am not confident though, because the 2018 midterms showed that the democrats can win when the do such a strategy.
     
    Trump dithering or backpeddling on most everything he ran on, and generally making an ass of himself, hasn't helped either.
    , @TheMediumIsTheMassage
    This is indeed a problem. The solution may be to force them to ramp up their BLM/pro-Islam/etc speech to the point where they can't support the white working class without being accused of being racist. Thankfully the BLM organizations themselves do a wonderful job at it, they recently heckled Bernie Sanders when he quoted MLK.
    , @J.Ross

    The Democrats are furiously trying to win back the white working class which they wrote off in 2011.
     
    I haven't seen this. They have ramped up the anti-Nazi scam, which Trump does almost nothing to fight, which energizes people already hypnotized by it, and which mainline Republicans submit to enthusiastically, but which doesn't win over new people (and which will only anger the hip). Biden had a spot lying about Trump's response to Charlottesville. Right out the gate, forget the stupid economy, forget how we talked about you, vote for us or you're a Nazi.
    , @Polynikes
    No offense, but that's pretty poor analysis. First, the midterms historically always swing back the other way.

    Secondly, the Republicans held most of the gains with the white working class. Where they lost ground was with the white suburbanites (especially women, ie soccer moms). You're pro nafta, polite society republicans, if you will.

    That coupled with a solid white liberal, especially young kids, turnout due to their anger at trump solidified things for the dems.
  13. J.Ross says: • Website
    @istevefan

    Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive of immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of President Trump.
     
    Less supportive of immigration: Check

    Less supportive of affirmative action: Check

    Less supportive of welfare spending: Check

    Less supportive of health care spending: Check

    More supportive of military spending: What? Are they crazy? We have by far the largest military budget in the world, and it ain't made one iota of a difference towards the immivasion. In fact the military even seems less than willing to actually patrol our border. What is driving support for more military spending in regards to Whites finding out they are to become a minority?

    “Military spending” is a confused issue because it conflates un-Washingtonian foreign adventurism (which traditionalists oppose but many apoliticals feel obligated to dilatorily support), medical benefits for veterans (which everybody supports), military research (which can be wildly hit or miss), and maintaining stuff we already have (which nobody, not even most congresscritters, thinks of).

  14. Decrease the pay-per-birth monthly welfare that increases with each US-born kid in a single-breadwinner household that stays under the earned-income limits for the programs via part-time work, along with decreasing the max refundable child tax credits (up to $6,431) for non-income-tax-paying noncitizens that take individual citizens three (or more) months to earn in full-time work.

    That would reverse much of the incentive to come here in droves.

    Instead, our POTUS increased legal immigration and doubled the non-refundable child tax credit. His bluster on illegal immigration has only resulted in a negligible 10% decrease in welfare consumption by womb-productive illegal aliens.

    It is not a Democratic plot; it is a Uniparty position to undercut US citizens in the labor market by flooding the US with welfare-eligible, womb-productive immigrants who can afford to work for less pay due to their layers of sex-and-reproduction pay from the US government.

    Where are the elderly immigrants, the ones that can’t get paid for womb-productive sex by Uncle Sam? They are eligible for zero free stuff. Why are US immigration officials discriminating by age, letting in only hordes of young womb producers? Why aren’t the elderly coming to the USA by the millions? Answer: Elderly immigrants are not paid by Uncle Sam and the US Treasury Department for womb-productive sex.

    • Replies: @Per Desteen
    So you want to offset a declining white birth rate by reducing the incentives for white upper, middle, and lower class to have children at all, in the face of all the costs that those not on welfare have to pay?

    Non-refundable credits mean dick when you don't have income in the first place. Also, illegals ain't filling out a 1040.
    , @Alden
    The day an immigrant who arrived last week turns 65 they are entitled to SSI disability subsidized housing food stamps free lunch and food pantries totally free Medicare & Medicaid free bus pass free van transportation social workers at their beck and call so they don’t have to go to the welfare office free translators and all the senior benefits Americans work 40 - 50 years for.

    The housing is the worst. Newly arrived immigrants get priority on senior housing and there are so many of them Americans never get the housing

    And they live 10 to 30 years on all those benefits.

    If we are the child health education and welfare department of Latin America and Africa, we are the pension system of Asia and India. UCLA “ students with children” housing is full of the gray haired grandparents of the grad students. So are entire Indian/Asian neighborhoods in and near Seattle, San Jose ca and in Texas and other centers where the capitalist pigs import their Asian & Indian tech workers and refuse to hire better qualified Americans because of government mandated racism against White Americans.
  15. J.Ross says: • Website

    I remember hearing about this study on NPR years ago and being totally williamshatnered that they were literally flat out talking about just lying. They were admitting that the bad horrible no good white bigots were the ones perceiving the world more accurately. I think the phrasing was (“)we need to be careful going forward in the way this information will be presented.(“) This partly explains, although it would surely happen anyway, the self-defeating never-ending focus by the mainstream media on every “refugee” who stubs his adorable little toe.

  16. Kirt says:
    @216
    Number of Christian Prime Ministers of Japan

    Number of Christian Prime Ministers of Israel

    Percentage of Christians in each country

    Taro Aso, a Christian, was Prime Minister of Japan for a brief time and is currently deputy Prime Minister. There may have been other Christian Prime Ministers of Japan; I don’t know. There has of course never been a Christian Prime Minister of Israel. The percentage of Christians in both countries is pretty small – 2% in Israel, 2.3% in Japan.

    • Replies: @anon

    There has of course never been a Christian Prime Minister of Israel.
     
    the real question is has there ever been a non-racist, non-supremacist Prime Minister of israel?
  17. Moses says:

    In fact, they represent the grand strategy of the Democratic Party to import enough future Democratic voters to turn the U.S. into a one-party country, unified mostly by constantly whipped-up hatred for the former majority.

    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a White face – forever.

  18. Let me be clear.
    I type on my keyboard as a Citizen Of The World. The GOP never defeated ME.
    If you want to keep your majority status, you can keep your majority status. I promise.
    I make rock-solid promises.
    Just as I stopped the rise in sea levels, I will stop the rise in non-European percentage of population.
    I can do so, because I am who we were waiting for.
    Trust ME.

  19. Not really OT, but here goes:

    If this isn’t brought up in this thread it’ll probably come up in another. MSNBC of all networks had a newsreader acknowledge that Venensuela’s citizens were at a disadvantage because they aren’t allowed to own firearms. The same thing is going to happen here when lefties get a critical mass. Bottom line, if you don’t own a gun, get one.

    BTW, I’m well aware that SJW politics, antifa, and so on aren’t the worst crisis this country faced (other than the civil war, revolutionary war … maybe 1812?) but a decade, two or three out, who knows what will happen.

  20. bomag says:

    A study… found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes…

    The effect disappeared when the authors told participants…

    Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive…

    The message here is that people are ruled by what they read and what they are told.

    I would like to think that there is plenty of lived experience out there to fill people in on what is going on.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    If people were even remotely inclined to trust actual "lived experience" as opposed to mass-media propaganda, it would have happened by now. But what, really, is your anecdote or two against tens of thousands of entertainment lectures? Racist much?
    , @Hypnotoad666

    A study… found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes…
     
    The real message is actually that ending immigration would make everyone get along better in this country.

    But for the NYT the only take-away is to keep people from learning the facts.
  21. I’m sensing some strong seismic vibrations coming off those two names…… like (((big))) ones.

  22. @istevefan

    Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive of immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of President Trump.
     
    Less supportive of immigration: Check

    Less supportive of affirmative action: Check

    Less supportive of welfare spending: Check

    Less supportive of health care spending: Check

    More supportive of military spending: What? Are they crazy? We have by far the largest military budget in the world, and it ain't made one iota of a difference towards the immivasion. In fact the military even seems less than willing to actually patrol our border. What is driving support for more military spending in regards to Whites finding out they are to become a minority?

    Maybe it’s due to military-related jobs. I read somewhere that the Congressional Military Industrial Complex makes sure there are jobs in all 50 states, so that Congressman are encouraged to keep up the funding.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Most really large projects have a subcontractor in every state, or as close as they can get. This of course greatly increases costs since this level of outsourcing is not really efficient.
    , @Jim Don Bob
    This has been going on for a long time. For instance, DoD made sure in the 80s that parts of the B-1 bomber were made in as many states as possible, with the help of willing Congress critters.
    , @Anon
    That sounds like Airbus assembly in Europe, where the fuselage of the planes is made in one country, the wings in another, engines in another, and final assembly in still another. It would be much more economical to just make everything in Germany, but of course that would be politically impossible.
  23. @istevefan

    Clearly, much more lying will be necessary.
     
    And they will be lying about more than immigration. The democrats are furiously trying to win back the White working class which they wrote off in 2011. They found out the hard way that they burned some bridges too soon, and it cost them some important Great Lakes states. They know they have to win those back in 2020, so they will end up running a White Judas goat like Biden or Beto to lie to those Whites to make them believe the democrats are the democrats of old. They will downplay their true anti-White animus.

    Let's hope those Whites don't fall for it. I am not confident though, because the 2018 midterms showed that the democrats can win when the do such a strategy.

    Let’s hope those Whites don’t fall for it. I am not confident though, because the 2018 midterms showed that the democrats can win when the do such a strategy.

    Trump dithering or backpeddling on most everything he ran on, and generally making an ass of himself, hasn’t helped either.

    • Replies: @AnotherDad

    Trump dithering or backpeddling on most everything he ran on, and generally making an ass of himself, hasn’t helped either.
     
    This.

    The President's party usually loses seats in mid-term elections, but this was particularly ridiculous given that the economy was doing well.

    Almost entirely due to Trump not following through and projecting competence. People are impressed by a leader who is actually leading them almost anywhere. And they would have been really impressed by a leader delivering actual nationalism, because that, when explained and delivered, is quite popular. But no one wants to follow a leader who looks like a confused chaotic mess.

    Unfortunately, Trump's the closest thing to a "nationalist" that we're getting ... so he gets my vote. But it ain't pretty, it's pretty depressing.
  24. The other thing that has whites lashing out:

    OT: Colleges capturing almost the entirety of the degree premium for themselves:

    https://www.epsilontheory.com/starry-eyes-and-starry-skies/

    • Replies: @Lot
    “OT: Colleges capturing almost the entirety of the degree premium for themselves:”

    I’d say well over 100%, to the extent it really exists.

    We really don’t have a way to test it since we need matched pairs of men with equal intellect, work ethic, personality etc who go to college or don’t, and then follow their income for decades.

    Such an experiment is impossible, though I’d love to see a study of Thiel fellows v Y Combinator recipients who are right out of college 5-10 years later.
  25. A growing body of research suggests that this sentiment may be driving significant political change in the United States, which is projected to become “majority minority” — with whites less than half of the population — by 2050.

    I think the term “majority minority” is interesting, because I don’t think it makes sense on a national level.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_minority

    A majority-minority area or minority-majority area is a term used in the United States to refer to a jurisdiction in which one or more racial and/or ethnic minorities (relative to the whole country’s population) make up a majority of the local population.

    But if there is no majority group in the whole nation, then the nation is just “all minority”.

    I mean, if and when whites are also a minority, are people still going to refer to “minorities” as meaning something other than whites? I guess they’ll just be careful to clarify as “disadvantaged minorities”. Whites will always be oppressive, even as a minority. After all, they would still be a plurality, which would be the next problem to be solved. How much whiteness is an acceptable amount, I wonder?

    • Replies: @Moses
    Stop using the term “minority.”

    Whites are a minority in the world at about 8% of world population. 19% of the world population is Chinese. About 16% is Black.

    Yes, Chinese alone outnumber Whites more than 2:1. Blacks alone outnumber Whites 2:1.

    Which group is the “minority” here?

    Instead of “minority” use the term “non-White.” It’s clearer, more accurate.

    The media loves “minority” because it implies marginalization and powerlessness. For this reason MSM (who controls the media? Rhetorical) will continue to use “minority” to refer to non-Whites even after Whites slip under 50% of the population. They will NEVER refer to Whites as a “minority”. (I think Steve once predicted they’ll use “legacy majority” for Whites which is my guess too).

    Words are the source code for thought. They subtly program the mind.

    Your enemies know this. Choose your words purposely, and wisely. Every time you use the word “minority” you advance their agenda.

    , @ben tillman

    But if there is no majority group in the whole nation, then the nation is just “all minority”.
     
    Right, and that's the term we should use.


    I mean, if and when whites are also a minority, are people still going to refer to “minorities” as meaning something other than whites?
     
    Yes, and that's why we should be rejecting the term "minorities" NOW.
  26. @216
    Number of Christian Prime Ministers of Japan

    Number of Christian Prime Ministers of Israel

    Percentage of Christians in each country

    There have been eight Christian prime ministers of Japan

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    The Empress for the last 30 years, until yesterday, came from a Catholic family. Like Queen Noor, she had to convert, or at least pretend to.

    Emperor Naruhito's brother Fumihito followed their father's example by marrying controversially himself, though this seems to be class rather than religion. This is important because Naruhito has no sons, thus Fumihito and his son are next in line for the throne.
    , @Romanian
    Is religion a big deal for Japanese identity? You could have the animist Shinto stuff and still be a Christian. Lots of pagan syncretism can be found in Christian areas even in Europe.
  27. @istevefan

    Clearly, much more lying will be necessary.
     
    And they will be lying about more than immigration. The democrats are furiously trying to win back the White working class which they wrote off in 2011. They found out the hard way that they burned some bridges too soon, and it cost them some important Great Lakes states. They know they have to win those back in 2020, so they will end up running a White Judas goat like Biden or Beto to lie to those Whites to make them believe the democrats are the democrats of old. They will downplay their true anti-White animus.

    Let's hope those Whites don't fall for it. I am not confident though, because the 2018 midterms showed that the democrats can win when the do such a strategy.

    This is indeed a problem. The solution may be to force them to ramp up their BLM/pro-Islam/etc speech to the point where they can’t support the white working class without being accused of being racist. Thankfully the BLM organizations themselves do a wonderful job at it, they recently heckled Bernie Sanders when he quoted MLK.

  28. Lot says:
    @Desiderius
    The other thing that has whites lashing out:

    OT: Colleges capturing almost the entirety of the degree premium for themselves:

    https://www.epsilontheory.com/starry-eyes-and-starry-skies/

    “OT: Colleges capturing almost the entirety of the degree premium for themselves:”

    I’d say well over 100%, to the extent it really exists.

    We really don’t have a way to test it since we need matched pairs of men with equal intellect, work ethic, personality etc who go to college or don’t, and then follow their income for decades.

    Such an experiment is impossible, though I’d love to see a study of Thiel fellows v Y Combinator recipients who are right out of college 5-10 years later.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Totally agree, but the article has nice graphs - read it.
  29. @Lot
    “OT: Colleges capturing almost the entirety of the degree premium for themselves:”

    I’d say well over 100%, to the extent it really exists.

    We really don’t have a way to test it since we need matched pairs of men with equal intellect, work ethic, personality etc who go to college or don’t, and then follow their income for decades.

    Such an experiment is impossible, though I’d love to see a study of Thiel fellows v Y Combinator recipients who are right out of college 5-10 years later.

    Totally agree, but the article has nice graphs – read it.

  30. They could have just used the HuffPo headline: Goy Bye!

    ~~

    To be fair, despite their distortion, simply by saying “ethnic majority” this article is much more honest about reality and motivations than 99% of the nonsense that is written.

    Our situation has many facets, but at root it is not complicated. Out of a WASPy sense of “fair play” and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America’s WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.

    But middle man minorities–especially endogamous ones–simply have different interests than the majority. Game theory 101.

    For the Jews, middle manning on top of a big rich, well run, culturally-Anglo, law-abiding gentile nation is really really nice gig. The fruit hangs heavy on the trees. But you’re still a minority in a big gentile nation. You’re still subject to the whims of that big gentile majority. (One that was coalescing more and more, with immigration restricted, into a common “white American” people.) It makes Jews twitchy–specially after the Holocaust. (Thanks Hitler!) To the Jews having a “multicultural nation”–i.e. a pathetically balkanized “nation”–with no coherent majority just seems “safer”. Instead of a coherent gentile majority that could boss the Jews around, there’s an incoherent, balkanized mess that can’t unite at all and is completely subject to elite (i.e. Jewish) control. Still big and rich, but now without the threat. Win, win!

    So that’s in fact, exactly where we’ve gone. Our republic is pretty much gone, replaced by elite diktat and the actual American nation is a declining rump. America isn’t much of a nation now, but 320 million random subjects of the super-state.

    ~~

    The only somewhat weird thing here is that this has been done while the secular Jews–with religious belief and practice in decline on both sides–have been intermarrying with the white gentiles. Many of these folks have gentile family members or even a spouse, but bashing whitey and his “white bread” culture still resonates. And in fact, the Jewish attitude–contempt–for the peasantry has dominated and spread through the increasingly mixed elite.

    As i’ve said before, i think this was a fool’s errand. Jews have never had it so good–no middle man minority in history has had it so good–as they’ve had it in Anglo-Protestant America. I think it was downright silly to turn the joint from a high-IQ, law-abiding Anglo-sphere nation into a balkanized, more-fractious, less competent and law-abiding Brazil-North. Especially silly while the East Asians were getting their act together, particularly China rising with a huge, compentent, 90% mono-ethnic population. But it turns out that even high IQ people can do stupid things. Some motivations are just too visceral.

    Admitting that their historic white gentile antagonists are really great people and had built the best most pleasant nations–the best most pleasant and prosperous nation–in the history of the world with their competence and cooperation … i think that was just too much to take.

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
    • Replies: @HammerJack
    Jewish anti-white propaganda has been rife in the mass media since the 1920s. Obviously it's gained critical mass since WW2, but it was not new. It's obviously more virulent and bald-faced in our own era, but the seeds were sown long ago.
    , @Desiderius

    Out of a WASPy sense of “fair play” and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America’s WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.
     
    Lol.

    No. America's WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn't nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.
    , @ATBOTL
    I sense in the near future, mainstream conservatives will begin to challenge the ethnic double standards of those who write articles like this and they will do so in a bold way.

    The hypocrisy is too much to stand. If you spend time around average conservatives, many are close to breaking. Noticing is at an all time high. So is speaking out. Almost all engaged conservatives are aware of this issue now.

    And when it starts to happen, the wailing and gnashing of teeth will be glorious to behold.
    , @Clyde
    Boy, I wish we had the same WASP run power structure that ran WW2, Korea, Vietnam. The settlement and building out of America along with our German and Germanics such as the Dutch. Our best farmers were (are) Germans and Germanics and so so many of these farm boys graduated into our major Mid western industries. Automobiles for one. Ball bearings too. But eternal WASP dominance was not meant to be. Their heirs and sons of heirs got weak
    Jews saw many openings and took them, but could do so only due to WASP weakness and spiritual weakness as Desiderius stated, plus many regressions to the mean. While their fathers ran industries the heirs fled into the arts and readily created academic slots.

    "The 1990 Immigration bill signed by papa Bush started H1B train and doubled family preference, aka chain migration numbers."
    More WASP weakness.
  31. By Max Fisher and Amanda Taub

    OHW MOIY GUWAAAAAAAAAD!!!!!!

  32. J.Ross says: • Website
    @istevefan

    Clearly, much more lying will be necessary.
     
    And they will be lying about more than immigration. The democrats are furiously trying to win back the White working class which they wrote off in 2011. They found out the hard way that they burned some bridges too soon, and it cost them some important Great Lakes states. They know they have to win those back in 2020, so they will end up running a White Judas goat like Biden or Beto to lie to those Whites to make them believe the democrats are the democrats of old. They will downplay their true anti-White animus.

    Let's hope those Whites don't fall for it. I am not confident though, because the 2018 midterms showed that the democrats can win when the do such a strategy.

    The Democrats are furiously trying to win back the white working class which they wrote off in 2011.

    I haven’t seen this. They have ramped up the anti-Nazi scam, which Trump does almost nothing to fight, which energizes people already hypnotized by it, and which mainline Republicans submit to enthusiastically, but which doesn’t win over new people (and which will only anger the hip). Biden had a spot lying about Trump’s response to Charlottesville. Right out the gate, forget the stupid economy, forget how we talked about you, vote for us or you’re a Nazi.

    • Agree: HammerJack
    • Replies: @istevefan
    Check out Trump's twitter feed today. He is upset that the fire fighters union endorsed Biden.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1123526475481800704


    So he is retweeting several tweets from firemen who say they support Trump. I've never seen him put so many retweets into his timeline. I count about 56 retweets!

    I think Trump understands the threat posed by Biden in taking the White working class vote in those key battleground states.
  33. So these “False Fears” are not so false. In fact, they represent the grand strategy of the Democratic Party to import enough future Democratic voters to turn the U.S. into a one-party country, unified mostly by constantly whipped-up hatred for the former majority.

    What could possibly go wrong, goy?

    Can I get out ahead of the crowd and express my hope that once the fun starts, all flights are grounded, all ports of entry are closed, and all the Fishers and Taubs get forced into ringside seats?

  34. @Crypto-Brythonic
    There have been eight Christian prime ministers of Japan

    The Empress for the last 30 years, until yesterday, came from a Catholic family. Like Queen Noor, she had to convert, or at least pretend to.

    Emperor Naruhito’s brother Fumihito followed their father’s example by marrying controversially himself, though this seems to be class rather than religion. This is important because Naruhito has no sons, thus Fumihito and his son are next in line for the throne.

  35. In a 2016 poll, 57 percent of whites said “discrimination against whites is as big a problem today as discrimination against blacks and other minorities.”

    K, I’m feeling creative, so it’s time to coin a phrase: Jews are overwhelmingly characterized by Learned Cluelessness. You know, like learned helplessness, except…

    It’s gonna be this yuuuuuuuuuuuuge surprise when it all blows up in their faces, UH-GAIN.

    On a serious note, Kevin MacDonald has written about this, about how Jews pursue high-risk, high-reward strategies. I’d add that it’s a compulsion, like with degenerate gamblers.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    57% of whites...in one poll. Maybe it'll increase to 58 or 59%. But it'll be 58% of 40% -- maybe even 65% of 30% one day.

    By the time white slavery is the official law of the land, I'll bet fully two-thirds of white people will be opposed to it.

    , @al anon
    Or like the mafia don who, after rising through the organization and controlling a multimillion dollar empire, gets arrested and sent away for robbing a liquor store.
  36. @14

    “Out of a WASPy sense of “fair play” and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America’s WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.”

    That’s a mischaracterization. Jews were already in the elite, completely dominating the slave trade, various industries, the banks, etc. They were in the Confederate leadership, organized crime, media, hollywood, and a host of other places. Bernard Baruch is a good name to look up, as he pretty much dominated defense spending and wartime mobilization.

    Not to mention that some of those ‘WASP’ leaders were of Jewish heritage. Rabbi Stephen Wise swore the Roosevelt family was Jewish. Lyndon Johnson is another, as well as fake Irish like John Kerry, who is about as Irish as Mao Tse Tung.

  37. Moses says:
    @ziggurat

    A growing body of research suggests that this sentiment may be driving significant political change in the United States, which is projected to become “majority minority” — with whites less than half of the population — by 2050.
     
    I think the term "majority minority" is interesting, because I don't think it makes sense on a national level.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_minority

    A majority-minority area or minority-majority area is a term used in the United States to refer to a jurisdiction in which one or more racial and/or ethnic minorities (relative to the whole country's population) make up a majority of the local population.
     
    But if there is no majority group in the whole nation, then the nation is just "all minority".

    I mean, if and when whites are also a minority, are people still going to refer to "minorities" as meaning something other than whites? I guess they'll just be careful to clarify as "disadvantaged minorities". Whites will always be oppressive, even as a minority. After all, they would still be a plurality, which would be the next problem to be solved. How much whiteness is an acceptable amount, I wonder?

    Stop using the term “minority.”

    Whites are a minority in the world at about 8% of world population. 19% of the world population is Chinese. About 16% is Black.

    Yes, Chinese alone outnumber Whites more than 2:1. Blacks alone outnumber Whites 2:1.

    Which group is the “minority” here?

    Instead of “minority” use the term “non-White.” It’s clearer, more accurate.

    The media loves “minority” because it implies marginalization and powerlessness. For this reason MSM (who controls the media? Rhetorical) will continue to use “minority” to refer to non-Whites even after Whites slip under 50% of the population. They will NEVER refer to Whites as a “minority”. (I think Steve once predicted they’ll use “legacy majority” for Whites which is my guess too).

    Words are the source code for thought. They subtly program the mind.

    Your enemies know this. Choose your words purposely, and wisely. Every time you use the word “minority” you advance their agenda.

    • Agree: Dtbb
    • Replies: @ben tillman

    The media loves “minority” because it implies marginalization and powerlessness. For this reason MSM (who controls the media? Rhetorical) will continue to use “minority” to refer to non-Whites even after Whites slip under 50% of the population.
     
    The indirect (but more important) implication of "minority" is that whites are numerically and therefore politically dominant.

    Stop using the term “minority.”
     
    Yes, I've been saying this for years. And correct people who use the term by pointing that whites are a minority. The discussion that this post addresses proves that this is something that actually makes a difference.
  38. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @ziggurat
    Maybe it's due to military-related jobs. I read somewhere that the Congressional Military Industrial Complex makes sure there are jobs in all 50 states, so that Congressman are encouraged to keep up the funding.

    Most really large projects have a subcontractor in every state, or as close as they can get. This of course greatly increases costs since this level of outsourcing is not really efficient.

  39. Many whites welcome pluralism and multiculturalism. But for those who see the decline of white dominance as destabilizing, any increase in the minority population is perceived as an attack.

    One of the striking things about the Jewish/minoritarian perspective, is this upsidedown view of normality.

    If i wake up tomorrow and there is someone else in my house–even if it’s say my more-or-less ethnically similar neighbor across the street–i’d find that pretty darn “destabilizing”. If it was say some Muslim guy that would be *really* destabilizing!

    Even when i invite someone–ergo selected, known, a friend–while i usually enjoy the visit quite a bit, when they take off and leave my home, there’s usually a bit of “aaaah” Things are back to normal, familiar, comfortable.” That’s–normal–human nature.

    The appropriate analogy to what’s going on the US, is that tomorrow you’ll wake up and they’ll be a Mexican in your house, then the next day a Chinese student, then the next day a pregnant woman from Honduras, then the next day another Mexican, then an Indian programmer, then a Somali cop!!! On and on and on.

    Nope, that’s completely normal. What are you worried about, it’s going to be great for you! You dumb gentiles and your silly, racist false fears.

    And the most fatuous thing? These lectures are delivered by a people who actually refused integration and kept themselves carefully, prickly, separate from other peoples for thousands of years. No interlopers allow in their house.

  40. I doubt if any western political party has a long term strategy to change their country’s politics through immigration policy. The average western politician is a non-reflective extrovert who isn’t into long-term strategic thinking. For example, the Australian Liberal Party imports more Asians that the Australian Labour Party, but I doubt if the Liberal Party thinks they are going to make Australia turn to the liberals by bringing in more Asians. They are just bringing in more Asians because the business class wants more Asian immigrants for economic reasons, and the Liberal Party has closer ties to big business than the Labour Party.

    For the Democrats to have a long-term strategy of replacing whites they would have to be consciously aware of HBD factors like racial differences in IQ. How else would they know that Hispanics are always likely to favour the higher tax party? More likely, the Dems want to be seen as the pro-immigrant, pro-minority party because they don’t want a war with increasing aggressive left-wing activists and don’t want to offend their existing NAM voters. Add they want to make the Republicans appear to be the bad, racist party. Rich white donors are okay with this because it doesn’t have much bearing on national economic policy. Even if the odd SW state does turn quasi-socialist due to Latin American immigration, America as a whole will probably stay a business-friendly, low tax country.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/757009490533294080
    , @Anonymous
    Not true.

    The UK's 'New Labour' *most certainly* had that policy objective.

    But, for obvious reasons they didn't advertise the fact. Unguarded tweets, comments and slips released every now and then, revealed the truth.
    , @ben tillman

    I doubt if any western political party has a long term strategy to change their country’s politics through immigration policy.

    Any mumber of Democrats have admitted this is what they are doing. Moreover, the consequence is foreseeable, which means it is intended.
     

     

     
  41. Anonymous[378] • Disclaimer says:
    @unpc downunder
    I doubt if any western political party has a long term strategy to change their country's politics through immigration policy. The average western politician is a non-reflective extrovert who isn't into long-term strategic thinking. For example, the Australian Liberal Party imports more Asians that the Australian Labour Party, but I doubt if the Liberal Party thinks they are going to make Australia turn to the liberals by bringing in more Asians. They are just bringing in more Asians because the business class wants more Asian immigrants for economic reasons, and the Liberal Party has closer ties to big business than the Labour Party.

    For the Democrats to have a long-term strategy of replacing whites they would have to be consciously aware of HBD factors like racial differences in IQ. How else would they know that Hispanics are always likely to favour the higher tax party? More likely, the Dems want to be seen as the pro-immigrant, pro-minority party because they don't want a war with increasing aggressive left-wing activists and don't want to offend their existing NAM voters. Add they want to make the Republicans appear to be the bad, racist party. Rich white donors are okay with this because it doesn't have much bearing on national economic policy. Even if the odd SW state does turn quasi-socialist due to Latin American immigration, America as a whole will probably stay a business-friendly, low tax country.

  42. Anonymous[229] • Disclaimer says:

    Surely, if being overrun was so fantastic there would be absolutely no need to shill for it.

    The public would be voluntarily clamoring for it.

  43. Anonymous[229] • Disclaimer says:

    Lefty/Economist ‘morality’:

    Ethnic displacement is by far the most evil thing ever when applied to any non white population, eg Palestinians, Tibetans, Amerindians, Tasmanians, Hottentots etc etc.

    But when whites of European extraction are ethnically displaced by non white populations, why, that’s the greatest most moral thing ever.

  44. Rosie says:
    @Joemac
    What possible evidence does steve actually have that their is a conscious concerted strategy amongst democrats to win through immigration and racial hatred towards whites? This is all conjecture.

    What possible evidence does steve actually have that their is a conscious concerted strategy amongst democrats to win through immigration and racial hatred towards whites? This is all conjecture.

    Foreseeable consequences should be presumed to be intended consequences. Traitors are not entitled to the benefit of the doubt.

    In any event, who cares whether it is a “conscious concerted strategy.” The result is the same either way.

    • Agree: RVBlake, Moses
    • Replies: @Joseph Doaks
    One would expect that the majority of American citizens would care if this is a “conscious concerted strategy,” but most of them evidently do not!
  45. Anonymous[229] • Disclaimer says:
    @unpc downunder
    I doubt if any western political party has a long term strategy to change their country's politics through immigration policy. The average western politician is a non-reflective extrovert who isn't into long-term strategic thinking. For example, the Australian Liberal Party imports more Asians that the Australian Labour Party, but I doubt if the Liberal Party thinks they are going to make Australia turn to the liberals by bringing in more Asians. They are just bringing in more Asians because the business class wants more Asian immigrants for economic reasons, and the Liberal Party has closer ties to big business than the Labour Party.

    For the Democrats to have a long-term strategy of replacing whites they would have to be consciously aware of HBD factors like racial differences in IQ. How else would they know that Hispanics are always likely to favour the higher tax party? More likely, the Dems want to be seen as the pro-immigrant, pro-minority party because they don't want a war with increasing aggressive left-wing activists and don't want to offend their existing NAM voters. Add they want to make the Republicans appear to be the bad, racist party. Rich white donors are okay with this because it doesn't have much bearing on national economic policy. Even if the odd SW state does turn quasi-socialist due to Latin American immigration, America as a whole will probably stay a business-friendly, low tax country.

    Not true.

    The UK’s ‘New Labour’ *most certainly* had that policy objective.

    But, for obvious reasons they didn’t advertise the fact. Unguarded tweets, comments and slips released every now and then, revealed the truth.

  46. @bomag

    A study... found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes...

    The effect disappeared when the authors told participants...

    Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive...
     
    The message here is that people are ruled by what they read and what they are told.

    I would like to think that there is plenty of lived experience out there to fill people in on what is going on.

    If people were even remotely inclined to trust actual “lived experience” as opposed to mass-media propaganda, it would have happened by now. But what, really, is your anecdote or two against tens of thousands of entertainment lectures? Racist much?

  47. @AnotherDad
    They could have just used the HuffPo headline: Goy Bye!

    ~~

    To be fair, despite their distortion, simply by saying "ethnic majority" this article is much more honest about reality and motivations than 99% of the nonsense that is written.


    Our situation has many facets, but at root it is not complicated. Out of a WASPy sense of "fair play" and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America's WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.

    But middle man minorities--especially endogamous ones--simply have different interests than the majority. Game theory 101.

    For the Jews, middle manning on top of a big rich, well run, culturally-Anglo, law-abiding gentile nation is really really nice gig. The fruit hangs heavy on the trees. But you're still a minority in a big gentile nation. You're still subject to the whims of that big gentile majority. (One that was coalescing more and more, with immigration restricted, into a common "white American" people.) It makes Jews twitchy--specially after the Holocaust. (Thanks Hitler!) To the Jews having a "multicultural nation"--i.e. a pathetically balkanized "nation"--with no coherent majority just seems "safer". Instead of a coherent gentile majority that could boss the Jews around, there's an incoherent, balkanized mess that can't unite at all and is completely subject to elite (i.e. Jewish) control. Still big and rich, but now without the threat. Win, win!

    So that's in fact, exactly where we've gone. Our republic is pretty much gone, replaced by elite diktat and the actual American nation is a declining rump. America isn't much of a nation now, but 320 million random subjects of the super-state.

    ~~

    The only somewhat weird thing here is that this has been done while the secular Jews--with religious belief and practice in decline on both sides--have been intermarrying with the white gentiles. Many of these folks have gentile family members or even a spouse, but bashing whitey and his "white bread" culture still resonates. And in fact, the Jewish attitude--contempt--for the peasantry has dominated and spread through the increasingly mixed elite.

    As i've said before, i think this was a fool's errand. Jews have never had it so good--no middle man minority in history has had it so good--as they've had it in Anglo-Protestant America. I think it was downright silly to turn the joint from a high-IQ, law-abiding Anglo-sphere nation into a balkanized, more-fractious, less competent and law-abiding Brazil-North. Especially silly while the East Asians were getting their act together, particularly China rising with a huge, compentent, 90% mono-ethnic population. But it turns out that even high IQ people can do stupid things. Some motivations are just too visceral.

    Admitting that their historic white gentile antagonists are really great people and had built the best most pleasant nations--the best most pleasant and prosperous nation--in the history of the world with their competence and cooperation ... i think that was just too much to take.

    Jewish anti-white propaganda has been rife in the mass media since the 1920s. Obviously it’s gained critical mass since WW2, but it was not new. It’s obviously more virulent and bald-faced in our own era, but the seeds were sown long ago.

  48. @Svigor

    In a 2016 poll, 57 percent of whites said “discrimination against whites is as big a problem today as discrimination against blacks and other minorities.”
     
    K, I'm feeling creative, so it's time to coin a phrase: Jews are overwhelmingly characterized by Learned Cluelessness. You know, like learned helplessness, except...

    It's gonna be this yuuuuuuuuuuuuge surprise when it all blows up in their faces, UH-GAIN.

    On a serious note, Kevin MacDonald has written about this, about how Jews pursue high-risk, high-reward strategies. I'd add that it's a compulsion, like with degenerate gamblers.

    57% of whites…in one poll. Maybe it’ll increase to 58 or 59%. But it’ll be 58% of 40% — maybe even 65% of 30% one day.

    By the time white slavery is the official law of the land, I’ll bet fully two-thirds of white people will be opposed to it.

  49. @istevefan

    Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive of immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of President Trump.
     
    Less supportive of immigration: Check

    Less supportive of affirmative action: Check

    Less supportive of welfare spending: Check

    Less supportive of health care spending: Check

    More supportive of military spending: What? Are they crazy? We have by far the largest military budget in the world, and it ain't made one iota of a difference towards the immivasion. In fact the military even seems less than willing to actually patrol our border. What is driving support for more military spending in regards to Whites finding out they are to become a minority?

    The lefties complaining about the military being racists who kill innocent people of color. You don’t know this, and your handle is istevefan?

  50. @Jack from Brookline
    I agree with Mr. Sailer that Whites will become a minority and a powerless one.
    Whites will be a hated minority with very high rates of suicide and opioid consumption.
    More and more white women are seen with non white men everyday and this is happening in all the
    White countries except Russia and Ukraine where Indian and other South Asian men date and breed with native women to an extent.
    In Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries almost every Black guy has a White baby moma. You can check the stats for yourself.

    YOU KNOW WHO IS TO BLAME FOR ALL THIS : WHITE MEN THEMSELVES.
    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
    Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.

    Anyway, future of America is a dwindling white population that is that is breeding more and more with Blacks(white women) and Asians(white men).
    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
    We went to the moon in late 60s and now we can't even decide if Trannies are mentally challneged or not.
    Reperations are being discussed for people who were never enslaved and people who never enslaved anyone are being asked to foot this boondoggle.
    Seriously, West is not even worth saving anymore.
    Be careful while bringing in more White babies to the world.

    I’m working to find a suitable use for the word “challneged”.

    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.

    History didn’t begin in 1980. Try searching for “Hart Celler”. Sure, Reagan’s amnesty sucked, but guess what, “amnesty” means they were already here.

    • Replies: @Prester John
    Yep! And behind "Hart Celler" lurked the Chief Underwriters-The Brothers Kennedy--made sufficiently woke by the memory of the SS St. Louis/"Ship of Fools" saga, not to mention the Lazarus poem. Yep--started in 1965 and still comin' atcha, goin' strong.
  51. @Anon
    This is basically the entire theme of the obsessively data driven book White Shift by Eric Kaufmann. Professor Kaufmann is somewhat Pinker-like in that he comes off very well in interviews and seems immune to attempts to libel or deplatform him.

    He has something else in common with Steven Pinker.

    He was raised in Canada.

  52. It’s not just about demographic replacement – it’s that anyone who is remotely paying attention realizes that the left intends to render whites politically irrelevant as well, even though they will be a plurality of voters/the population for quite a bit longer. With the in-your-face anti-white position of progressives, they also don’t plan on treating the new political minority kindly, either.

    The GOP is a pathetic cast of neuters, but it’s all that stands between us and a political coalition that cannot wait to start exacting retribution against the majority of the people in this country.

    • Replies: @ben tillman

    The GOP is a pathetic cast of neuters, but it’s all that stands between us and a political coalition that cannot wait to start exacting retribution against the majority of the people in this country.
     
    Pretending to exact retribution.
    , @Anon
    Yes the model is the ANC in South Africa, which holds power in perpetuity.
  53. I guess Max Fisher and Amanda Taub hadn’t read this blog post from Captain Capitalism titled “A World without White People” because he mentionned some unintended consequences.
    https://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2016/11/a-world-without-white-people.html
    http://archive.fo/35QHT

    I quote an exterpt:
    This brings up a third interesting point. Who are you going to blame?

    Though the intent of this post is to get minorities of today to realize the problem they will face tomorrow (and perhaps even provide a solution to their poverty today) , I am fully aware of human nature. And human nature (regardless of race) puts ego, pride, and arrogance above reason, intelligence, reality, and responsibility. People would rather have a scapegoat to excuse their laziness, poor decisions, and mistakes than own up to them, change them, and thus improve their lives forever. This has afforded minorities (and women I might add) about 60 years of worth of excuses that has done nothing but spare them guilt at the expense of their livelihoods. And no attempt at reason, sanity, or logic has seemed to get them off of their addiction to “blaming whitey” for their problems, no matter how much better lives they’d lead.

    Therefore, it is my (admittedly) pessimistic and misanthropic prediction that once whitey isn’t around anymore to blame, minorities will simply blame each other.

    Blacks will blame Hispanics.
    Hispanics will blame Asians.
    Asians will simply leave (as I predict Asians won’t tolerate a slave-level of taxation).
    And everybody will be incredibly original and blame “the Jews.”

  54. A study by Maureen Craig of New York University and Jennifer Richeson of Yale University found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes toward Latinos, blacks, and Asian-Americans” and “more automatic pro-white/anti-minority bias.”

    The effect disappeared when the authors told participants that whites were expected to remain politically and culturally dominant.

    Makes sense to me. By way of analogy, I like all my neighbors well enough; but if you told me that they were all going to move into my place uninvited, lay claim to the property, remodel it to suit their own whim and fancy and generally make my life miserable … well yeah, I’d start to take a more negative view of them.

    Makes sense to me.

  55. More lying? We clearly need more laws mandating the correct point of view, with tough felony sentencing to a SuperMax (without voting rights) for those who think, speak and/or vote against the accepted orthodoxy.

  56. Displacement takes multiple forms. There’s outright homicide, of course. But also there is the strategy of demoralization, to make people give up on bringing children into the 3rd world hellhole that the US is becoming. Or degrading the public schools and libraries (turning them into pens for peasant immigrants and vagrants) so as to put the cost of raising and educating children out of reach for many people. The power elite look at this and laugh, safe in their gated communities. ‘Brazil of the North’ someone has called it.

  57. whites correctly fear the near future when whites are a minority in a nation founded by their ancestors. For the last 100+ years whites have been fleeing Diversity, moving their families away from Blacks and increasingly hispanics to live among fellow white with “good schools” for their children.

    but many white are not fully aware of the drastic demographic changes which have occurred since 1990 , because they still live in white areas. Many of my relatives are clueless about it, because their neighborhoods are still 97% white as a few Asians have moved into their town so they think they have diversity.

    It is certainly true that when whites are shown the future demographics they become very concerned about it if they have children. Deep down even leftists realize the United States cannot survive when the white population falls below 40%.

  58. If whites are a minority, entities like the New York Times are irrelevant. What will the Times employees do then? Nobody in the then majority will care about left vs. right, gay or transgender rights or anything else whites obsess themselves with. They certainly will not care about whites who have a patronizing tone toward non-whites. What will become of the Democratic Party then?

  59. @Rosie

    What possible evidence does steve actually have that their is a conscious concerted strategy amongst democrats to win through immigration and racial hatred towards whites? This is all conjecture.
     
    Foreseeable consequences should be presumed to be intended consequences. Traitors are not entitled to the benefit of the doubt.

    In any event, who cares whether it is a "conscious concerted strategy." The result is the same either way.

    One would expect that the majority of American citizens would care if this is a “conscious concerted strategy,” but most of them evidently do not!

  60. Whites are being replaced. Outbred and overrun by non-white.

    The fear is really just an observation of fact, as confirmed by demographics and promoted as something to embrace and welcomed by the elites , the media and our clergy. Strange how the Press overwhelmingly praises diversity and cannot wait for whites to be a minority , while stating the whites should not fear being ethnically cleansed from our nation.

  61. @Kirt
    Taro Aso, a Christian, was Prime Minister of Japan for a brief time and is currently deputy Prime Minister. There may have been other Christian Prime Ministers of Japan; I don't know. There has of course never been a Christian Prime Minister of Israel. The percentage of Christians in both countries is pretty small - 2% in Israel, 2.3% in Japan.

    There has of course never been a Christian Prime Minister of Israel.

    the real question is has there ever been a non-racist, non-supremacist Prime Minister of israel?

  62. @216
    Number of Christian Prime Ministers of Japan

    Number of Christian Prime Ministers of Israel

    Percentage of Christians in each country

    Asō is the seventh Christian prime minister of Japan, after Takashi Hara, Korekiyo Takahashi, Tetsu Katayama, Ichirō Hatoyama, Masayoshi Ōhira, and his own grandfather Shigeru Yoshida. Would Americans ever vote for a Buddhist President? They did vote for a Muslimist one, Obama.

  63. @AnotherDad
    They could have just used the HuffPo headline: Goy Bye!

    ~~

    To be fair, despite their distortion, simply by saying "ethnic majority" this article is much more honest about reality and motivations than 99% of the nonsense that is written.


    Our situation has many facets, but at root it is not complicated. Out of a WASPy sense of "fair play" and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America's WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.

    But middle man minorities--especially endogamous ones--simply have different interests than the majority. Game theory 101.

    For the Jews, middle manning on top of a big rich, well run, culturally-Anglo, law-abiding gentile nation is really really nice gig. The fruit hangs heavy on the trees. But you're still a minority in a big gentile nation. You're still subject to the whims of that big gentile majority. (One that was coalescing more and more, with immigration restricted, into a common "white American" people.) It makes Jews twitchy--specially after the Holocaust. (Thanks Hitler!) To the Jews having a "multicultural nation"--i.e. a pathetically balkanized "nation"--with no coherent majority just seems "safer". Instead of a coherent gentile majority that could boss the Jews around, there's an incoherent, balkanized mess that can't unite at all and is completely subject to elite (i.e. Jewish) control. Still big and rich, but now without the threat. Win, win!

    So that's in fact, exactly where we've gone. Our republic is pretty much gone, replaced by elite diktat and the actual American nation is a declining rump. America isn't much of a nation now, but 320 million random subjects of the super-state.

    ~~

    The only somewhat weird thing here is that this has been done while the secular Jews--with religious belief and practice in decline on both sides--have been intermarrying with the white gentiles. Many of these folks have gentile family members or even a spouse, but bashing whitey and his "white bread" culture still resonates. And in fact, the Jewish attitude--contempt--for the peasantry has dominated and spread through the increasingly mixed elite.

    As i've said before, i think this was a fool's errand. Jews have never had it so good--no middle man minority in history has had it so good--as they've had it in Anglo-Protestant America. I think it was downright silly to turn the joint from a high-IQ, law-abiding Anglo-sphere nation into a balkanized, more-fractious, less competent and law-abiding Brazil-North. Especially silly while the East Asians were getting their act together, particularly China rising with a huge, compentent, 90% mono-ethnic population. But it turns out that even high IQ people can do stupid things. Some motivations are just too visceral.

    Admitting that their historic white gentile antagonists are really great people and had built the best most pleasant nations--the best most pleasant and prosperous nation--in the history of the world with their competence and cooperation ... i think that was just too much to take.

    Out of a WASPy sense of “fair play” and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America’s WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.

    Lol.

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.

    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.

     

    It will take a USA patriot Euro mongrel with some Virginia English ancestry to put the hostile JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire in its place.

    Sinners in the hands of an angry God indeed.

    Mitt Romney is a New England WASP Mammonite and so was the Young guy from Massachusetts who started that Mormon Mammonite crud.

    New England English people are great -- New England WASPs are just as bad and evil as some of the JEWS.

    The JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire is evil.
    , @Wade
    BS... This outcome was heavily influenced by Jewish input. The media heavily encouraged the creation of American Empire as early as WWI with the encouragement of our entry into the war against German, which we should've never taken part in. Power and glory are offered to those statement who support our military adventures now as well as then. Power attracts the easily corruptible and so here we are!
    , @AnotherDad

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.
     
    Des, any explanation of this--or pretty much any other--social change that's jammed into an internet comment isn't going to do the actual phenomenon justice.

    The internationalism involved in fighting the Cold War was certainly part of the process. As Steve's pointed, it was because of a Cold War 3rd world outreach program that Obama Sr. was even in Hawaii and able to knock up the 17 year old ugly duckling Stanley. Projecting an image of "openness to all" was definitely part of the strategy.

    But the 2nd part of your statement is not correct. The WASPs didn't just stick "their heirs" at the head of these new globalized institutions and certainly didn't eliminate all rivals. (The US is still run by just WASPs? Seriously?) There was--in the wake of the War and in the process of fighting the Cold War--some sort of "fair play" opening up of American institutions to "meritocracy". And it's through that door that the Jews rose to great influence and in many cases dominance of American institutions--continually pushing and propagandizing minoritarianism.

    (Just to be clear, the Jews were already dominant in the incredibly influential mass media--Hollyweird, which has been a huge conduit pushing minoritarian narratives. But there was a big ramp up of Jewish penetration of and influence in other establishment institutions--government, academia, law, business--with the meriocratic opening post-War.)
  64. @Jack from Brookline
    I agree with Mr. Sailer that Whites will become a minority and a powerless one.
    Whites will be a hated minority with very high rates of suicide and opioid consumption.
    More and more white women are seen with non white men everyday and this is happening in all the
    White countries except Russia and Ukraine where Indian and other South Asian men date and breed with native women to an extent.
    In Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries almost every Black guy has a White baby moma. You can check the stats for yourself.

    YOU KNOW WHO IS TO BLAME FOR ALL THIS : WHITE MEN THEMSELVES.
    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
    Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.

    Anyway, future of America is a dwindling white population that is that is breeding more and more with Blacks(white women) and Asians(white men).
    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
    We went to the moon in late 60s and now we can't even decide if Trannies are mentally challneged or not.
    Reperations are being discussed for people who were never enslaved and people who never enslaved anyone are being asked to foot this boondoggle.
    Seriously, West is not even worth saving anymore.
    Be careful while bringing in more White babies to the world.

    Totally agree. The 1990 Immigration bill signed by papa Bush started H1B train and doubled family preference, aka chain migration numbers.

    • Replies: @Travis
    true...prior to the Immigration Act of 1990 Legal Immigration averaged 450,000 per year from 1969-1989. After the Immigration Act of 1990 Legal immigration averaged 950,000 per year. Not only did the act create the H1B visa program , the Act also created the Diversity Visa program and extended the 1986 amnesty to cover Central Americans. Congress also created the temporary protected status (TPS visa), which the Attorney General may provide to immigrants who are temporarily unable to safely return to their home country. The act also lifted the English testing process for naturalization. It eliminated exclusion of homosexuals under the medically unsound classification of "sexual deviant" that was in the 1965 Act.

    The Senate that passed this bill was comprised of the World War II generation and only 2 baby boomers were even in the Senate in 1990 and Al Gore voted against the Immigration Act of 1990 as did 14 other Democrats. Only 3 GOP senators opposed the Act- Pete Wilson of CA, Jesse Helms of NC and Warren Rudman of NH.

  65. @Desiderius

    Out of a WASPy sense of “fair play” and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America’s WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.
     
    Lol.

    No. America's WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn't nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.

    It will take a USA patriot Euro mongrel with some Virginia English ancestry to put the hostile JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire in its place.

    Sinners in the hands of an angry God indeed.

    Mitt Romney is a New England WASP Mammonite and so was the Young guy from Massachusetts who started that Mormon Mammonite crud.

    New England English people are great — New England WASPs are just as bad and evil as some of the JEWS.

    The JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire is evil.

    • Replies: @Alden
    I read a history of the American Methodist church and China. Can’t remember the name of the book. The American Methodists started missionarying and colonizing China around 1800.

    Then there was the founding father’s idea that Cuba, like Florida was a natural part of the United States off shore Islands. That almost happened after the entirely unnecessary bogus Spanish American war. Instead of wealthy Cuba with its strategic location, we got the welfare burden of Puerto Rico. And Cubans have colonized S Florida.
  66. @ziggurat
    Maybe it's due to military-related jobs. I read somewhere that the Congressional Military Industrial Complex makes sure there are jobs in all 50 states, so that Congressman are encouraged to keep up the funding.

    This has been going on for a long time. For instance, DoD made sure in the 80s that parts of the B-1 bomber were made in as many states as possible, with the help of willing Congress critters.

  67. @James Speaks
    Implicit in the analysis is that white fears about other races are false, but other races fears over white dominance is validated.

    Funny how that works, isn’t it?

    • Replies: @James Speaks
    Prejudice against whites is implicit in the narrative. It needs to be called out every time it is encountered.
  68. Wade says:
    @Desiderius

    Out of a WASPy sense of “fair play” and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America’s WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.
     
    Lol.

    No. America's WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn't nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.

    BS… This outcome was heavily influenced by Jewish input. The media heavily encouraged the creation of American Empire as early as WWI with the encouragement of our entry into the war against German, which we should’ve never taken part in. Power and glory are offered to those statement who support our military adventures now as well as then. Power attracts the easily corruptible and so here we are!

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    The media tell the WASPs what they want hear. Jews have always been among the best at matching supply with demand.
  69. @Jack from Brookline
    I agree with Mr. Sailer that Whites will become a minority and a powerless one.
    Whites will be a hated minority with very high rates of suicide and opioid consumption.
    More and more white women are seen with non white men everyday and this is happening in all the
    White countries except Russia and Ukraine where Indian and other South Asian men date and breed with native women to an extent.
    In Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries almost every Black guy has a White baby moma. You can check the stats for yourself.

    YOU KNOW WHO IS TO BLAME FOR ALL THIS : WHITE MEN THEMSELVES.
    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
    Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.

    Anyway, future of America is a dwindling white population that is that is breeding more and more with Blacks(white women) and Asians(white men).
    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
    We went to the moon in late 60s and now we can't even decide if Trannies are mentally challneged or not.
    Reperations are being discussed for people who were never enslaved and people who never enslaved anyone are being asked to foot this boondoggle.
    Seriously, West is not even worth saving anymore.
    Be careful while bringing in more White babies to the world.

    Pretty much.

  70. @istevefan

    Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive of immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of President Trump.
     
    Less supportive of immigration: Check

    Less supportive of affirmative action: Check

    Less supportive of welfare spending: Check

    Less supportive of health care spending: Check

    More supportive of military spending: What? Are they crazy? We have by far the largest military budget in the world, and it ain't made one iota of a difference towards the immivasion. In fact the military even seems less than willing to actually patrol our border. What is driving support for more military spending in regards to Whites finding out they are to become a minority?

    Yes. If the average white conservative still thinks the military is on his side, there’s not much helping him.

  71. @Jack from Brookline
    I agree with Mr. Sailer that Whites will become a minority and a powerless one.
    Whites will be a hated minority with very high rates of suicide and opioid consumption.
    More and more white women are seen with non white men everyday and this is happening in all the
    White countries except Russia and Ukraine where Indian and other South Asian men date and breed with native women to an extent.
    In Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries almost every Black guy has a White baby moma. You can check the stats for yourself.

    YOU KNOW WHO IS TO BLAME FOR ALL THIS : WHITE MEN THEMSELVES.
    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
    Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.

    Anyway, future of America is a dwindling white population that is that is breeding more and more with Blacks(white women) and Asians(white men).
    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
    We went to the moon in late 60s and now we can't even decide if Trannies are mentally challneged or not.
    Reperations are being discussed for people who were never enslaved and people who never enslaved anyone are being asked to foot this boondoggle.
    Seriously, West is not even worth saving anymore.
    Be careful while bringing in more White babies to the world.

    “Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.”

    This fact still hasn’t sunk in with many boomer conservatives. But we gen Xers remember it and millennials have looked up the facts and know it too. I’m amazed at how boomer conservatives who are new to immigration skepticism retcon the entire past of the immigration debate to imagine that all conservatives were always restrictionists. Gingrich did immense harm to America by stifling immigration reform legislation. Legal immigration could have been dramatically reduced.

  72. @AnotherDad
    They could have just used the HuffPo headline: Goy Bye!

    ~~

    To be fair, despite their distortion, simply by saying "ethnic majority" this article is much more honest about reality and motivations than 99% of the nonsense that is written.


    Our situation has many facets, but at root it is not complicated. Out of a WASPy sense of "fair play" and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America's WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.

    But middle man minorities--especially endogamous ones--simply have different interests than the majority. Game theory 101.

    For the Jews, middle manning on top of a big rich, well run, culturally-Anglo, law-abiding gentile nation is really really nice gig. The fruit hangs heavy on the trees. But you're still a minority in a big gentile nation. You're still subject to the whims of that big gentile majority. (One that was coalescing more and more, with immigration restricted, into a common "white American" people.) It makes Jews twitchy--specially after the Holocaust. (Thanks Hitler!) To the Jews having a "multicultural nation"--i.e. a pathetically balkanized "nation"--with no coherent majority just seems "safer". Instead of a coherent gentile majority that could boss the Jews around, there's an incoherent, balkanized mess that can't unite at all and is completely subject to elite (i.e. Jewish) control. Still big and rich, but now without the threat. Win, win!

    So that's in fact, exactly where we've gone. Our republic is pretty much gone, replaced by elite diktat and the actual American nation is a declining rump. America isn't much of a nation now, but 320 million random subjects of the super-state.

    ~~

    The only somewhat weird thing here is that this has been done while the secular Jews--with religious belief and practice in decline on both sides--have been intermarrying with the white gentiles. Many of these folks have gentile family members or even a spouse, but bashing whitey and his "white bread" culture still resonates. And in fact, the Jewish attitude--contempt--for the peasantry has dominated and spread through the increasingly mixed elite.

    As i've said before, i think this was a fool's errand. Jews have never had it so good--no middle man minority in history has had it so good--as they've had it in Anglo-Protestant America. I think it was downright silly to turn the joint from a high-IQ, law-abiding Anglo-sphere nation into a balkanized, more-fractious, less competent and law-abiding Brazil-North. Especially silly while the East Asians were getting their act together, particularly China rising with a huge, compentent, 90% mono-ethnic population. But it turns out that even high IQ people can do stupid things. Some motivations are just too visceral.

    Admitting that their historic white gentile antagonists are really great people and had built the best most pleasant nations--the best most pleasant and prosperous nation--in the history of the world with their competence and cooperation ... i think that was just too much to take.

    I sense in the near future, mainstream conservatives will begin to challenge the ethnic double standards of those who write articles like this and they will do so in a bold way.

    The hypocrisy is too much to stand. If you spend time around average conservatives, many are close to breaking. Noticing is at an all time high. So is speaking out. Almost all engaged conservatives are aware of this issue now.

    And when it starts to happen, the wailing and gnashing of teeth will be glorious to behold.

    • Replies: @Moses
    I dunno. The conservacucks I know are beyond redemption.

    All they do is pine for open borders because “muh big agriculture needs labor!”

    When I point out that they are cutting their own throats because Latin immigrants reliably vote >2:1 for Dems they go into cognitive dissonance or blame the GOP for being @raaacist.”

    Yet they all live in supermajority White neighborhoods, send their kids to White schools. They get really angry when I point that out.

    Conservacucks are also addicted to approval from their liberal friends.

    These traitors are worse than the enemy.

    The only way out of the crucible is through it.

    GOP must die.

  73. @Jack from Brookline
    I agree with Mr. Sailer that Whites will become a minority and a powerless one.
    Whites will be a hated minority with very high rates of suicide and opioid consumption.
    More and more white women are seen with non white men everyday and this is happening in all the
    White countries except Russia and Ukraine where Indian and other South Asian men date and breed with native women to an extent.
    In Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries almost every Black guy has a White baby moma. You can check the stats for yourself.

    YOU KNOW WHO IS TO BLAME FOR ALL THIS : WHITE MEN THEMSELVES.
    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
    Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.

    Anyway, future of America is a dwindling white population that is that is breeding more and more with Blacks(white women) and Asians(white men).
    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
    We went to the moon in late 60s and now we can't even decide if Trannies are mentally challneged or not.
    Reperations are being discussed for people who were never enslaved and people who never enslaved anyone are being asked to foot this boondoggle.
    Seriously, West is not even worth saving anymore.
    Be careful while bringing in more White babies to the world.

    And about the white woman/non-white male thing: like the pedastalizers around here, I used to assume that was hyperbolic. After all, the “data” doesn’t really bear out the idea of white women defecting en masse, but that’s because that sort of data doesn’t exist – usually it covers marriage rates, which are deceptive for obvious reasons. All I can say is that the DC area is notorious for its ugly women; the last four times I’ve seen a truly attractive white woman (young, slender, etc), it’s been with not-particularly-attractive brown males. At a certain point, you have to start believing your lying eyes and realize you have zero stake in any of this. None. Don’t be gaslighted for a moment into thinking otherwise. That is, after all one of their oldest tricks, similar to how everyone is allowed to think they’re “middle class.”

  74. @J.Ross

    The Democrats are furiously trying to win back the white working class which they wrote off in 2011.
     
    I haven't seen this. They have ramped up the anti-Nazi scam, which Trump does almost nothing to fight, which energizes people already hypnotized by it, and which mainline Republicans submit to enthusiastically, but which doesn't win over new people (and which will only anger the hip). Biden had a spot lying about Trump's response to Charlottesville. Right out the gate, forget the stupid economy, forget how we talked about you, vote for us or you're a Nazi.

    Check out Trump’s twitter feed today. He is upset that the fire fighters union endorsed Biden.

    So he is retweeting several tweets from firemen who say they support Trump. I’ve never seen him put so many retweets into his timeline. I count about 56 retweets!

    I think Trump understands the threat posed by Biden in taking the White working class vote in those key battleground states.

  75. @Mr. Anon

    Let’s hope those Whites don’t fall for it. I am not confident though, because the 2018 midterms showed that the democrats can win when the do such a strategy.
     
    Trump dithering or backpeddling on most everything he ran on, and generally making an ass of himself, hasn't helped either.

    Trump dithering or backpeddling on most everything he ran on, and generally making an ass of himself, hasn’t helped either.

    This.

    The President’s party usually loses seats in mid-term elections, but this was particularly ridiculous given that the economy was doing well.

    Almost entirely due to Trump not following through and projecting competence. People are impressed by a leader who is actually leading them almost anywhere. And they would have been really impressed by a leader delivering actual nationalism, because that, when explained and delivered, is quite popular. But no one wants to follow a leader who looks like a confused chaotic mess.

    Unfortunately, Trump’s the closest thing to a “nationalist” that we’re getting … so he gets my vote. But it ain’t pretty, it’s pretty depressing.

  76. The facts they lay out back up The Great Replacement. But if you notice, you are a instantly a Nazi?

    • Replies: @Hrw-500
    Unless you try to be more sneaky, talking of a different Great Replacement like blacks being replaced by hispanics as it was the case in a smaller scale like Compton and South Los Angeles and now being 2nd in demographics in Chicago for example.
  77. @Oleaginous Outrager
    I'm working to find a suitable use for the word "challneged".


    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
     
    History didn't begin in 1980. Try searching for "Hart Celler". Sure, Reagan's amnesty sucked, but guess what, "amnesty" means they were already here.

    Yep! And behind “Hart Celler” lurked the Chief Underwriters-The Brothers Kennedy–made sufficiently woke by the memory of the SS St. Louis/”Ship of Fools” saga, not to mention the Lazarus poem. Yep–started in 1965 and still comin’ atcha, goin’ strong.

  78. @Desiderius

    Out of a WASPy sense of “fair play” and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America’s WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.
     
    Lol.

    No. America's WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn't nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.

    Des, any explanation of this–or pretty much any other–social change that’s jammed into an internet comment isn’t going to do the actual phenomenon justice.

    The internationalism involved in fighting the Cold War was certainly part of the process. As Steve’s pointed, it was because of a Cold War 3rd world outreach program that Obama Sr. was even in Hawaii and able to knock up the 17 year old ugly duckling Stanley. Projecting an image of “openness to all” was definitely part of the strategy.

    But the 2nd part of your statement is not correct. The WASPs didn’t just stick “their heirs” at the head of these new globalized institutions and certainly didn’t eliminate all rivals. (The US is still run by just WASPs? Seriously?) There was–in the wake of the War and in the process of fighting the Cold War–some sort of “fair play” opening up of American institutions to “meritocracy”. And it’s through that door that the Jews rose to great influence and in many cases dominance of American institutions–continually pushing and propagandizing minoritarianism.

    (Just to be clear, the Jews were already dominant in the incredibly influential mass media–Hollyweird, which has been a huge conduit pushing minoritarian narratives. But there was a big ramp up of Jewish penetration of and influence in other establishment institutions–government, academia, law, business–with the meriocratic opening post-War.)

    • Replies: @Desiderius

    some sort of “fair play” opening up of American institutions to “meritocracy”
     
    Yes, for about a generation, until the legacy families noticed that the newly admitted white ethnics (including of course Jews) were eating their lunch. Everything since then, especially Affirmative Action, has been a rear-guard action to keep us at bay.

    If you want to see a perfect illustration of the above watch the movie Harvard Beats Yale 29-29. Notice the Harvard white ethnics and the Yale WASPs, including one of W’s best buds who makes himself the heel of the story.

    https://youtu.be/Wgb9iLNC7yI
    , @Desiderius
    You’re talking yourself into a charge of the light brigade into a buzzsaw. Trump and the GOPe have been focused like a laser on peeling Jewish support away from the Ds, who are frantically trying to retain it.

    They’re all desperate for an anti-Semitic foil. Don’t volunteer.
    , @Desiderius

    The US is still run by just WASPs? Seriously?
     
    Of course. You think the Jews run Tennessee? This is about ambitious WASP soccer moms throughout all fifty states wanting their daughters and sons to rule the world, not just some piddly country:

    https://libertyunyielding.com/2019/04/08/collective-punishment-at-the-university-of-tennessee/
  79. @Jack from Brookline
    I agree with Mr. Sailer that Whites will become a minority and a powerless one.
    Whites will be a hated minority with very high rates of suicide and opioid consumption.
    More and more white women are seen with non white men everyday and this is happening in all the
    White countries except Russia and Ukraine where Indian and other South Asian men date and breed with native women to an extent.
    In Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries almost every Black guy has a White baby moma. You can check the stats for yourself.

    YOU KNOW WHO IS TO BLAME FOR ALL THIS : WHITE MEN THEMSELVES.
    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
    Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.

    Anyway, future of America is a dwindling white population that is that is breeding more and more with Blacks(white women) and Asians(white men).
    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
    We went to the moon in late 60s and now we can't even decide if Trannies are mentally challneged or not.
    Reperations are being discussed for people who were never enslaved and people who never enslaved anyone are being asked to foot this boondoggle.
    Seriously, West is not even worth saving anymore.
    Be careful while bringing in more White babies to the world.

    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.

    wouldn’t surprise me

  80. @istevefan

    Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive of immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of President Trump.
     
    Less supportive of immigration: Check

    Less supportive of affirmative action: Check

    Less supportive of welfare spending: Check

    Less supportive of health care spending: Check

    More supportive of military spending: What? Are they crazy? We have by far the largest military budget in the world, and it ain't made one iota of a difference towards the immivasion. In fact the military even seems less than willing to actually patrol our border. What is driving support for more military spending in regards to Whites finding out they are to become a minority?

    More supportive of military spending: What?

    Are they crazy?

    But, but….how we gonna otherwise liberate Vuvuzelians from that bus driver?

  81. @Endgame Napoleon
    Decrease the pay-per-birth monthly welfare that increases with each US-born kid in a single-breadwinner household that stays under the earned-income limits for the programs via part-time work, along with decreasing the max refundable child tax credits (up to $6,431) for non-income-tax-paying noncitizens that take individual citizens three (or more) months to earn in full-time work.

    That would reverse much of the incentive to come here in droves.

    Instead, our POTUS increased legal immigration and doubled the non-refundable child tax credit. His bluster on illegal immigration has only resulted in a negligible 10% decrease in welfare consumption by womb-productive illegal aliens.

    It is not a Democratic plot; it is a Uniparty position to undercut US citizens in the labor market by flooding the US with welfare-eligible, womb-productive immigrants who can afford to work for less pay due to their layers of sex-and-reproduction pay from the US government.

    Where are the elderly immigrants, the ones that can’t get paid for womb-productive sex by Uncle Sam? They are eligible for zero free stuff. Why are US immigration officials discriminating by age, letting in only hordes of young womb producers? Why aren’t the elderly coming to the USA by the millions? Answer: Elderly immigrants are not paid by Uncle Sam and the US Treasury Department for womb-productive sex.

    So you want to offset a declining white birth rate by reducing the incentives for white upper, middle, and lower class to have children at all, in the face of all the costs that those not on welfare have to pay?

    Non-refundable credits mean dick when you don’t have income in the first place. Also, illegals ain’t filling out a 1040.

    • Agree: Alden
  82. … Many whites welcome pluralism and multiculturalism. But for those who see the decline of white dominance as destabilizing, any increase in the minority population is perceived as an attack.

    It has nothing to do with stability. It’s about resources. We are harmed when other life forms take resources from us.

    • Replies: @Michael S
    It's also destabilizing. That's not a lie or exaggerated worry. If we were bringing in Chinese by the millions, it would be slightly less destabilizing, but since the millions we're bringing in all come from groups with low IQ and high criminality/corruption, it is extremely destabilizing.

    Denying that political stability has anything to do with demographics is pure magic dirt fantasy. Even in the racially-homogenous parts of Europe, just having multiple major ethnicities tends to be destabilizing.
  83. @ziggurat

    A growing body of research suggests that this sentiment may be driving significant political change in the United States, which is projected to become “majority minority” — with whites less than half of the population — by 2050.
     
    I think the term "majority minority" is interesting, because I don't think it makes sense on a national level.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_minority

    A majority-minority area or minority-majority area is a term used in the United States to refer to a jurisdiction in which one or more racial and/or ethnic minorities (relative to the whole country's population) make up a majority of the local population.
     
    But if there is no majority group in the whole nation, then the nation is just "all minority".

    I mean, if and when whites are also a minority, are people still going to refer to "minorities" as meaning something other than whites? I guess they'll just be careful to clarify as "disadvantaged minorities". Whites will always be oppressive, even as a minority. After all, they would still be a plurality, which would be the next problem to be solved. How much whiteness is an acceptable amount, I wonder?

    But if there is no majority group in the whole nation, then the nation is just “all minority”.

    Right, and that’s the term we should use.

    I mean, if and when whites are also a minority, are people still going to refer to “minorities” as meaning something other than whites?

    Yes, and that’s why we should be rejecting the term “minorities” NOW.

  84. There is one instance in which the NYT crowd overlooks deference to non white third worlders. That is when the United Methodists take up sodomy. Then the third world folks are just plain hateful.

    • Agree: Desiderius
  85. @indocon
    Totally agree. The 1990 Immigration bill signed by papa Bush started H1B train and doubled family preference, aka chain migration numbers.

    true…prior to the Immigration Act of 1990 Legal Immigration averaged 450,000 per year from 1969-1989. After the Immigration Act of 1990 Legal immigration averaged 950,000 per year. Not only did the act create the H1B visa program , the Act also created the Diversity Visa program and extended the 1986 amnesty to cover Central Americans. Congress also created the temporary protected status (TPS visa), which the Attorney General may provide to immigrants who are temporarily unable to safely return to their home country. The act also lifted the English testing process for naturalization. It eliminated exclusion of homosexuals under the medically unsound classification of “sexual deviant” that was in the 1965 Act.

    The Senate that passed this bill was comprised of the World War II generation and only 2 baby boomers were even in the Senate in 1990 and Al Gore voted against the Immigration Act of 1990 as did 14 other Democrats. Only 3 GOP senators opposed the Act- Pete Wilson of CA, Jesse Helms of NC and Warren Rudman of NH.

  86. Anonymous[378] • Disclaimer says:

  87. @Wade
    BS... This outcome was heavily influenced by Jewish input. The media heavily encouraged the creation of American Empire as early as WWI with the encouragement of our entry into the war against German, which we should've never taken part in. Power and glory are offered to those statement who support our military adventures now as well as then. Power attracts the easily corruptible and so here we are!

    The media tell the WASPs what they want hear. Jews have always been among the best at matching supply with demand.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    The apparatus of public opinion formation leads. It does not follow.
  88. @Anon87
    The facts they lay out back up The Great Replacement. But if you notice, you are a instantly a Nazi?

    Unless you try to be more sneaky, talking of a different Great Replacement like blacks being replaced by hispanics as it was the case in a smaller scale like Compton and South Los Angeles and now being 2nd in demographics in Chicago for example.

  89. @AnotherDad

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.
     
    Des, any explanation of this--or pretty much any other--social change that's jammed into an internet comment isn't going to do the actual phenomenon justice.

    The internationalism involved in fighting the Cold War was certainly part of the process. As Steve's pointed, it was because of a Cold War 3rd world outreach program that Obama Sr. was even in Hawaii and able to knock up the 17 year old ugly duckling Stanley. Projecting an image of "openness to all" was definitely part of the strategy.

    But the 2nd part of your statement is not correct. The WASPs didn't just stick "their heirs" at the head of these new globalized institutions and certainly didn't eliminate all rivals. (The US is still run by just WASPs? Seriously?) There was--in the wake of the War and in the process of fighting the Cold War--some sort of "fair play" opening up of American institutions to "meritocracy". And it's through that door that the Jews rose to great influence and in many cases dominance of American institutions--continually pushing and propagandizing minoritarianism.

    (Just to be clear, the Jews were already dominant in the incredibly influential mass media--Hollyweird, which has been a huge conduit pushing minoritarian narratives. But there was a big ramp up of Jewish penetration of and influence in other establishment institutions--government, academia, law, business--with the meriocratic opening post-War.)

    some sort of “fair play” opening up of American institutions to “meritocracy”

    Yes, for about a generation, until the legacy families noticed that the newly admitted white ethnics (including of course Jews) were eating their lunch. Everything since then, especially Affirmative Action, has been a rear-guard action to keep us at bay.

    If you want to see a perfect illustration of the above watch the movie Harvard Beats Yale 29-29. Notice the Harvard white ethnics and the Yale WASPs, including one of W’s best buds who makes himself the heel of the story.

  90. @Crypto-Brythonic
    There have been eight Christian prime ministers of Japan

    Is religion a big deal for Japanese identity? You could have the animist Shinto stuff and still be a Christian. Lots of pagan syncretism can be found in Christian areas even in Europe.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Yes and no. Shinto is an extremely spare and accommodating faith -- it doesn't qualify as what most people think of as a "religion" and most Japanese see no contradiction in being Confucian Shinto Buddhists. The thing is, this was already made an issue hundreds of years ago, and less from Shinto exclusivity than from hostility to Christianity as recognizably foreign.
  91. @AnotherDad

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.
     
    Des, any explanation of this--or pretty much any other--social change that's jammed into an internet comment isn't going to do the actual phenomenon justice.

    The internationalism involved in fighting the Cold War was certainly part of the process. As Steve's pointed, it was because of a Cold War 3rd world outreach program that Obama Sr. was even in Hawaii and able to knock up the 17 year old ugly duckling Stanley. Projecting an image of "openness to all" was definitely part of the strategy.

    But the 2nd part of your statement is not correct. The WASPs didn't just stick "their heirs" at the head of these new globalized institutions and certainly didn't eliminate all rivals. (The US is still run by just WASPs? Seriously?) There was--in the wake of the War and in the process of fighting the Cold War--some sort of "fair play" opening up of American institutions to "meritocracy". And it's through that door that the Jews rose to great influence and in many cases dominance of American institutions--continually pushing and propagandizing minoritarianism.

    (Just to be clear, the Jews were already dominant in the incredibly influential mass media--Hollyweird, which has been a huge conduit pushing minoritarian narratives. But there was a big ramp up of Jewish penetration of and influence in other establishment institutions--government, academia, law, business--with the meriocratic opening post-War.)

    You’re talking yourself into a charge of the light brigade into a buzzsaw. Trump and the GOPe have been focused like a laser on peeling Jewish support away from the Ds, who are frantically trying to retain it.

    They’re all desperate for an anti-Semitic foil. Don’t volunteer.

    • Replies: @Vinteuil

    Trump and the GOPe have been focused like a laser on peeling Jewish support away from the Ds, who are frantically trying to retain it.

    They’re all desperate for an anti-Semitic foil. Don’t volunteer.
     
    I wish that I had said that.

    I mean, look - we need more Lot's, & JackD's, & syonredux's, & International Jew's, etc., on our side - not fewer. With the rise of characters like Ilhan Omar on the left, maybe we can get some more to flip. You don't do that with vinegar. You do that with honey.
  92. @ben tillman

    … Many whites welcome pluralism and multiculturalism. But for those who see the decline of white dominance as destabilizing, any increase in the minority population is perceived as an attack.
     
    It has nothing to do with stability. It's about resources. We are harmed when other life forms take resources from us.

    It’s also destabilizing. That’s not a lie or exaggerated worry. If we were bringing in Chinese by the millions, it would be slightly less destabilizing, but since the millions we’re bringing in all come from groups with low IQ and high criminality/corruption, it is extremely destabilizing.

    Denying that political stability has anything to do with demographics is pure magic dirt fantasy. Even in the racially-homogenous parts of Europe, just having multiple major ethnicities tends to be destabilizing.

  93. @AnotherDad

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.
     
    Des, any explanation of this--or pretty much any other--social change that's jammed into an internet comment isn't going to do the actual phenomenon justice.

    The internationalism involved in fighting the Cold War was certainly part of the process. As Steve's pointed, it was because of a Cold War 3rd world outreach program that Obama Sr. was even in Hawaii and able to knock up the 17 year old ugly duckling Stanley. Projecting an image of "openness to all" was definitely part of the strategy.

    But the 2nd part of your statement is not correct. The WASPs didn't just stick "their heirs" at the head of these new globalized institutions and certainly didn't eliminate all rivals. (The US is still run by just WASPs? Seriously?) There was--in the wake of the War and in the process of fighting the Cold War--some sort of "fair play" opening up of American institutions to "meritocracy". And it's through that door that the Jews rose to great influence and in many cases dominance of American institutions--continually pushing and propagandizing minoritarianism.

    (Just to be clear, the Jews were already dominant in the incredibly influential mass media--Hollyweird, which has been a huge conduit pushing minoritarian narratives. But there was a big ramp up of Jewish penetration of and influence in other establishment institutions--government, academia, law, business--with the meriocratic opening post-War.)

    The US is still run by just WASPs? Seriously?

    Of course. You think the Jews run Tennessee? This is about ambitious WASP soccer moms throughout all fifty states wanting their daughters and sons to rule the world, not just some piddly country:

    https://libertyunyielding.com/2019/04/08/collective-punishment-at-the-university-of-tennessee/

    • Replies: @ben tillman

    Of course. You think the Jews run Tennessee? This is about ambitious WASP soccer moms throughout all fifty states wanting their daughters and sons to rule the world, not just some piddly country:

    https://libertyunyielding.com/2019/04/08/collective-punishment-at-the-university-of-tennessee/
     
    The Jewish community does not "run" Tennessee, but it exerts a huge degree of control over what happens there (especially uin regard to racial matters), and, yes, collective punishment is a Jewish thing, and, yes, what you see at UT is a result of public opinion formation and other social controls (incentivization, both positive and negative) by the Jewish group.
  94. @Wade
    Funny how that works, isn't it?

    Prejudice against whites is implicit in the narrative. It needs to be called out every time it is encountered.

  95. @Svigor

    In a 2016 poll, 57 percent of whites said “discrimination against whites is as big a problem today as discrimination against blacks and other minorities.”
     
    K, I'm feeling creative, so it's time to coin a phrase: Jews are overwhelmingly characterized by Learned Cluelessness. You know, like learned helplessness, except...

    It's gonna be this yuuuuuuuuuuuuge surprise when it all blows up in their faces, UH-GAIN.

    On a serious note, Kevin MacDonald has written about this, about how Jews pursue high-risk, high-reward strategies. I'd add that it's a compulsion, like with degenerate gamblers.

    Or like the mafia don who, after rising through the organization and controlling a multimillion dollar empire, gets arrested and sent away for robbing a liquor store.

  96. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Romanian
    Is religion a big deal for Japanese identity? You could have the animist Shinto stuff and still be a Christian. Lots of pagan syncretism can be found in Christian areas even in Europe.

    Yes and no. Shinto is an extremely spare and accommodating faith — it doesn’t qualify as what most people think of as a “religion” and most Japanese see no contradiction in being Confucian Shinto Buddhists. The thing is, this was already made an issue hundreds of years ago, and less from Shinto exclusivity than from hostility to Christianity as recognizably foreign.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Didn’t help that Nagasaki was the heart of Japanese Christianity. Heckuva job, Harry!
  97. @Joemac
    What possible evidence does steve actually have that their is a conscious concerted strategy amongst democrats to win through immigration and racial hatred towards whites? This is all conjecture.

    Has anybody ever actually seen a store that sells, let alone home delivers, peet saw? Unthinking suggestible chatterers talk about it all the time but where is the evidence?

  98. @bomag

    A study... found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes...

    The effect disappeared when the authors told participants...

    Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive...
     
    The message here is that people are ruled by what they read and what they are told.

    I would like to think that there is plenty of lived experience out there to fill people in on what is going on.

    A study… found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes…

    The real message is actually that ending immigration would make everyone get along better in this country.

    But for the NYT the only take-away is to keep people from learning the facts.

    • Replies: @Clyde

    But for the NYT the only take-away is to keep people from learning the facts.
     
    As far as comments go at the NYT. The readers picks for top comments argue against the soft as a grape "explaining" by the authors. This is one of the current type of "explaining" articles the NYT and Washington Post like to run for their educated (what a laugh) millennials.
  99. anon[411] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joemac
    What possible evidence does steve actually have that their is a conscious concerted strategy amongst democrats to win through immigration and racial hatred towards whites? This is all conjecture.

    They just had to get the ball rolling with the 1965 Hart-Celler Act. Much of the rest is organic with each new ethnicity/race/religion doing whatever they can to bring their own over here from over there. Kith and kin politics and economics follows. As does the destruction of heritage America ideas and institutions.

  100. Although the authors don’t admit this, their article actually demonstrates that democracy is an illegitimate form of government because it does not sufficiently privilege the majority.

  101. @AnotherDad
    They could have just used the HuffPo headline: Goy Bye!

    ~~

    To be fair, despite their distortion, simply by saying "ethnic majority" this article is much more honest about reality and motivations than 99% of the nonsense that is written.


    Our situation has many facets, but at root it is not complicated. Out of a WASPy sense of "fair play" and basic gentile cooperation/sharing, further animated by the obvious evil of the holocaust, America's WASP leadership tossed in the towel, and gave up control to nominal meriocratic leadership, immediately snapped up by the Jews.

    But middle man minorities--especially endogamous ones--simply have different interests than the majority. Game theory 101.

    For the Jews, middle manning on top of a big rich, well run, culturally-Anglo, law-abiding gentile nation is really really nice gig. The fruit hangs heavy on the trees. But you're still a minority in a big gentile nation. You're still subject to the whims of that big gentile majority. (One that was coalescing more and more, with immigration restricted, into a common "white American" people.) It makes Jews twitchy--specially after the Holocaust. (Thanks Hitler!) To the Jews having a "multicultural nation"--i.e. a pathetically balkanized "nation"--with no coherent majority just seems "safer". Instead of a coherent gentile majority that could boss the Jews around, there's an incoherent, balkanized mess that can't unite at all and is completely subject to elite (i.e. Jewish) control. Still big and rich, but now without the threat. Win, win!

    So that's in fact, exactly where we've gone. Our republic is pretty much gone, replaced by elite diktat and the actual American nation is a declining rump. America isn't much of a nation now, but 320 million random subjects of the super-state.

    ~~

    The only somewhat weird thing here is that this has been done while the secular Jews--with religious belief and practice in decline on both sides--have been intermarrying with the white gentiles. Many of these folks have gentile family members or even a spouse, but bashing whitey and his "white bread" culture still resonates. And in fact, the Jewish attitude--contempt--for the peasantry has dominated and spread through the increasingly mixed elite.

    As i've said before, i think this was a fool's errand. Jews have never had it so good--no middle man minority in history has had it so good--as they've had it in Anglo-Protestant America. I think it was downright silly to turn the joint from a high-IQ, law-abiding Anglo-sphere nation into a balkanized, more-fractious, less competent and law-abiding Brazil-North. Especially silly while the East Asians were getting their act together, particularly China rising with a huge, compentent, 90% mono-ethnic population. But it turns out that even high IQ people can do stupid things. Some motivations are just too visceral.

    Admitting that their historic white gentile antagonists are really great people and had built the best most pleasant nations--the best most pleasant and prosperous nation--in the history of the world with their competence and cooperation ... i think that was just too much to take.

    Boy, I wish we had the same WASP run power structure that ran WW2, Korea, Vietnam. The settlement and building out of America along with our German and Germanics such as the Dutch. Our best farmers were (are) Germans and Germanics and so so many of these farm boys graduated into our major Mid western industries. Automobiles for one. Ball bearings too. But eternal WASP dominance was not meant to be. Their heirs and sons of heirs got weak
    Jews saw many openings and took them, but could do so only due to WASP weakness and spiritual weakness as Desiderius stated, plus many regressions to the mean. While their fathers ran industries the heirs fled into the arts and readily created academic slots.

    “The 1990 Immigration bill signed by papa Bush started H1B train and doubled family preference, aka chain migration numbers.”
    More WASP weakness.

  102. @Desiderius
    You’re talking yourself into a charge of the light brigade into a buzzsaw. Trump and the GOPe have been focused like a laser on peeling Jewish support away from the Ds, who are frantically trying to retain it.

    They’re all desperate for an anti-Semitic foil. Don’t volunteer.

    Trump and the GOPe have been focused like a laser on peeling Jewish support away from the Ds, who are frantically trying to retain it.

    They’re all desperate for an anti-Semitic foil. Don’t volunteer.

    I wish that I had said that.

    I mean, look – we need more Lot’s, & JackD’s, & syonredux’s, & International Jew’s, etc., on our side – not fewer. With the rise of characters like Ilhan Omar on the left, maybe we can get some more to flip. You don’t do that with vinegar. You do that with honey.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    No, with Jews you’d better bring both. We all know what all that honey got the doofus Evangelicals.
    , @Svigor
    My side needs more Syons, sure. Lot doesn't seem to be on my side. I like the guy, but he's playing for a different team. Jack D sure as fuck isn't on my side. He's on Team Jew, "shill to a gonservative audience" division. Period. It isn't even worth tallying a ratio of "Jack helping my side" to "Jack shilling among my side on behalf of Jews" comments. You need a positive number on the left side to get a ratio.

    You don’t do that with vinegar. You do that with honey.
     
    There's no getting Jews on my side. That's how race-realism works. The few exceptions like Syon (to the extent he's actually simpatico with WNism, which I'll leave for him to say) are apostates. I.e., no longer Jews.
  103. @Endgame Napoleon
    Decrease the pay-per-birth monthly welfare that increases with each US-born kid in a single-breadwinner household that stays under the earned-income limits for the programs via part-time work, along with decreasing the max refundable child tax credits (up to $6,431) for non-income-tax-paying noncitizens that take individual citizens three (or more) months to earn in full-time work.

    That would reverse much of the incentive to come here in droves.

    Instead, our POTUS increased legal immigration and doubled the non-refundable child tax credit. His bluster on illegal immigration has only resulted in a negligible 10% decrease in welfare consumption by womb-productive illegal aliens.

    It is not a Democratic plot; it is a Uniparty position to undercut US citizens in the labor market by flooding the US with welfare-eligible, womb-productive immigrants who can afford to work for less pay due to their layers of sex-and-reproduction pay from the US government.

    Where are the elderly immigrants, the ones that can’t get paid for womb-productive sex by Uncle Sam? They are eligible for zero free stuff. Why are US immigration officials discriminating by age, letting in only hordes of young womb producers? Why aren’t the elderly coming to the USA by the millions? Answer: Elderly immigrants are not paid by Uncle Sam and the US Treasury Department for womb-productive sex.

    The day an immigrant who arrived last week turns 65 they are entitled to SSI disability subsidized housing food stamps free lunch and food pantries totally free Medicare & Medicaid free bus pass free van transportation social workers at their beck and call so they don’t have to go to the welfare office free translators and all the senior benefits Americans work 40 – 50 years for.

    The housing is the worst. Newly arrived immigrants get priority on senior housing and there are so many of them Americans never get the housing

    And they live 10 to 30 years on all those benefits.

    If we are the child health education and welfare department of Latin America and Africa, we are the pension system of Asia and India. UCLA “ students with children” housing is full of the gray haired grandparents of the grad students. So are entire Indian/Asian neighborhoods in and near Seattle, San Jose ca and in Texas and other centers where the capitalist pigs import their Asian & Indian tech workers and refuse to hire better qualified Americans because of government mandated racism against White Americans.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Social Security was already fraudulent but in its final years they just had to shove in the entire sexagenarian population of Central America. It's like the Burning Sun guy getting beaten by cops after getting beaten by bouncers: this will only make it worse for them once word gets out.
  104. @Hypnotoad666

    A study… found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes…
     
    The real message is actually that ending immigration would make everyone get along better in this country.

    But for the NYT the only take-away is to keep people from learning the facts.

    But for the NYT the only take-away is to keep people from learning the facts.

    As far as comments go at the NYT. The readers picks for top comments argue against the soft as a grape “explaining” by the authors. This is one of the current type of “explaining” articles the NYT and Washington Post like to run for their educated (what a laugh) millennials.

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666

    This is one of the current type of “explaining” articles the NYT and Washington Post like to run for their educated (what a laugh) millennials.
     
    Sometimes young libs get confused when they try to apply universal principles to different scenarios. In other words, they forget the difference between tactical rhetoric and the actual Party Line, which is always based on the"Who-Whom" dichotomy. (Once proletariat vs. bourgeoisie; now POC vs. White).

    So they need to decisively cut off any independent thought and "Timesplain" the correct point of view:
    namely, that fear of whites is always real, while fear of POC is always "false," by definition.
  105. @Charles Pewitt

    No. America’s WASP leadership decided that ruling a mere country wasn’t nearly enough for their overweening vanity, newly unchecked by their abandonment of the spiritual discipline of their ancestors, so they set about creating global institutions with themselves and their heirs at the head and eliminating any rivals to their newly minted global citizens, namely American ones.

     

    It will take a USA patriot Euro mongrel with some Virginia English ancestry to put the hostile JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire in its place.

    Sinners in the hands of an angry God indeed.

    Mitt Romney is a New England WASP Mammonite and so was the Young guy from Massachusetts who started that Mormon Mammonite crud.

    New England English people are great -- New England WASPs are just as bad and evil as some of the JEWS.

    The JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire is evil.

    I read a history of the American Methodist church and China. Can’t remember the name of the book. The American Methodists started missionarying and colonizing China around 1800.

    Then there was the founding father’s idea that Cuba, like Florida was a natural part of the United States off shore Islands. That almost happened after the entirely unnecessary bogus Spanish American war. Instead of wealthy Cuba with its strategic location, we got the welfare burden of Puerto Rico. And Cubans have colonized S Florida.

  106. @Moses
    Stop using the term “minority.”

    Whites are a minority in the world at about 8% of world population. 19% of the world population is Chinese. About 16% is Black.

    Yes, Chinese alone outnumber Whites more than 2:1. Blacks alone outnumber Whites 2:1.

    Which group is the “minority” here?

    Instead of “minority” use the term “non-White.” It’s clearer, more accurate.

    The media loves “minority” because it implies marginalization and powerlessness. For this reason MSM (who controls the media? Rhetorical) will continue to use “minority” to refer to non-Whites even after Whites slip under 50% of the population. They will NEVER refer to Whites as a “minority”. (I think Steve once predicted they’ll use “legacy majority” for Whites which is my guess too).

    Words are the source code for thought. They subtly program the mind.

    Your enemies know this. Choose your words purposely, and wisely. Every time you use the word “minority” you advance their agenda.

    The media loves “minority” because it implies marginalization and powerlessness. For this reason MSM (who controls the media? Rhetorical) will continue to use “minority” to refer to non-Whites even after Whites slip under 50% of the population.

    The indirect (but more important) implication of “minority” is that whites are numerically and therefore politically dominant.

    Stop using the term “minority.”

    Yes, I’ve been saying this for years. And correct people who use the term by pointing that whites are a minority. The discussion that this post addresses proves that this is something that actually makes a difference.

  107. @Clyde

    But for the NYT the only take-away is to keep people from learning the facts.
     
    As far as comments go at the NYT. The readers picks for top comments argue against the soft as a grape "explaining" by the authors. This is one of the current type of "explaining" articles the NYT and Washington Post like to run for their educated (what a laugh) millennials.

    This is one of the current type of “explaining” articles the NYT and Washington Post like to run for their educated (what a laugh) millennials.

    Sometimes young libs get confused when they try to apply universal principles to different scenarios. In other words, they forget the difference between tactical rhetoric and the actual Party Line, which is always based on the”Who-Whom” dichotomy. (Once proletariat vs. bourgeoisie; now POC vs. White).

    So they need to decisively cut off any independent thought and “Timesplain” the correct point of view:
    namely, that fear of whites is always real, while fear of POC is always “false,” by definition.

  108. @Vinteuil

    Trump and the GOPe have been focused like a laser on peeling Jewish support away from the Ds, who are frantically trying to retain it.

    They’re all desperate for an anti-Semitic foil. Don’t volunteer.
     
    I wish that I had said that.

    I mean, look - we need more Lot's, & JackD's, & syonredux's, & International Jew's, etc., on our side - not fewer. With the rise of characters like Ilhan Omar on the left, maybe we can get some more to flip. You don't do that with vinegar. You do that with honey.

    No, with Jews you’d better bring both. We all know what all that honey got the doofus Evangelicals.

    • Replies: @Vinteuil
    Is there any example, in all of history, of un-requited love that even begins to compare t0 the devotion of evangelical Christians to the Jews?
  109. @unpc downunder
    I doubt if any western political party has a long term strategy to change their country's politics through immigration policy. The average western politician is a non-reflective extrovert who isn't into long-term strategic thinking. For example, the Australian Liberal Party imports more Asians that the Australian Labour Party, but I doubt if the Liberal Party thinks they are going to make Australia turn to the liberals by bringing in more Asians. They are just bringing in more Asians because the business class wants more Asian immigrants for economic reasons, and the Liberal Party has closer ties to big business than the Labour Party.

    For the Democrats to have a long-term strategy of replacing whites they would have to be consciously aware of HBD factors like racial differences in IQ. How else would they know that Hispanics are always likely to favour the higher tax party? More likely, the Dems want to be seen as the pro-immigrant, pro-minority party because they don't want a war with increasing aggressive left-wing activists and don't want to offend their existing NAM voters. Add they want to make the Republicans appear to be the bad, racist party. Rich white donors are okay with this because it doesn't have much bearing on national economic policy. Even if the odd SW state does turn quasi-socialist due to Latin American immigration, America as a whole will probably stay a business-friendly, low tax country.

    I doubt if any western political party has a long term strategy to change their country’s politics through immigration policy.

    Any mumber of Democrats have admitted this is what they are doing. Moreover, the consequence is foreseeable, which means it is intended.

  110. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Alden
    The day an immigrant who arrived last week turns 65 they are entitled to SSI disability subsidized housing food stamps free lunch and food pantries totally free Medicare & Medicaid free bus pass free van transportation social workers at their beck and call so they don’t have to go to the welfare office free translators and all the senior benefits Americans work 40 - 50 years for.

    The housing is the worst. Newly arrived immigrants get priority on senior housing and there are so many of them Americans never get the housing

    And they live 10 to 30 years on all those benefits.

    If we are the child health education and welfare department of Latin America and Africa, we are the pension system of Asia and India. UCLA “ students with children” housing is full of the gray haired grandparents of the grad students. So are entire Indian/Asian neighborhoods in and near Seattle, San Jose ca and in Texas and other centers where the capitalist pigs import their Asian & Indian tech workers and refuse to hire better qualified Americans because of government mandated racism against White Americans.

    Social Security was already fraudulent but in its final years they just had to shove in the entire sexagenarian population of Central America. It’s like the Burning Sun guy getting beaten by cops after getting beaten by bouncers: this will only make it worse for them once word gets out.

  111. @Desiderius
    No, with Jews you’d better bring both. We all know what all that honey got the doofus Evangelicals.

    Is there any example, in all of history, of un-requited love that even begins to compare t0 the devotion of evangelical Christians to the Jews?

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Woke internet dudes and women, blacks, gays, you name it?
  112. @Arclight
    It's not just about demographic replacement - it's that anyone who is remotely paying attention realizes that the left intends to render whites politically irrelevant as well, even though they will be a plurality of voters/the population for quite a bit longer. With the in-your-face anti-white position of progressives, they also don't plan on treating the new political minority kindly, either.

    The GOP is a pathetic cast of neuters, but it's all that stands between us and a political coalition that cannot wait to start exacting retribution against the majority of the people in this country.

    The GOP is a pathetic cast of neuters, but it’s all that stands between us and a political coalition that cannot wait to start exacting retribution against the majority of the people in this country.

    Pretending to exact retribution.

  113. @Desiderius
    The media tell the WASPs what they want hear. Jews have always been among the best at matching supply with demand.

    The apparatus of public opinion formation leads. It does not follow.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Yeah right, I'm sure America's suburban moms are being led by those fat fucks Zucker and Stelter. They're being led by their pussies and their pussies tell them that the strong horse is the world bestriding empire and those who advocate for it.

    You only beat that by being stronger, not by whining about being dominated by people who couldn't fight their way out of a paper shtetl for centuries.

  114. Moses says:
    @ATBOTL
    I sense in the near future, mainstream conservatives will begin to challenge the ethnic double standards of those who write articles like this and they will do so in a bold way.

    The hypocrisy is too much to stand. If you spend time around average conservatives, many are close to breaking. Noticing is at an all time high. So is speaking out. Almost all engaged conservatives are aware of this issue now.

    And when it starts to happen, the wailing and gnashing of teeth will be glorious to behold.

    I dunno. The conservacucks I know are beyond redemption.

    All they do is pine for open borders because “muh big agriculture needs labor!”

    When I point out that they are cutting their own throats because Latin immigrants reliably vote >2:1 for Dems they go into cognitive dissonance or blame the GOP for being @raaacist.”

    Yet they all live in supermajority White neighborhoods, send their kids to White schools. They get really angry when I point that out.

    Conservacucks are also addicted to approval from their liberal friends.

    These traitors are worse than the enemy.

    The only way out of the crucible is through it.

    GOP must die.

  115. @Vinteuil
    Is there any example, in all of history, of un-requited love that even begins to compare t0 the devotion of evangelical Christians to the Jews?

    Woke internet dudes and women, blacks, gays, you name it?

  116. @ben tillman
    The apparatus of public opinion formation leads. It does not follow.

    Yeah right, I’m sure America’s suburban moms are being led by those fat fucks Zucker and Stelter. They’re being led by their pussies and their pussies tell them that the strong horse is the world bestriding empire and those who advocate for it.

    You only beat that by being stronger, not by whining about being dominated by people who couldn’t fight their way out of a paper shtetl for centuries.

    • Replies: @ben tillman

    Yeah right, I’m sure America’s suburban moms are being led by those fat fucks Zucker and Stelter. They’re being led by their pussies and their pussies tell them that the strong horse is the world bestriding empire and those who advocate for it.
     
    In other words, if what you said were true, you would be agreeing with me. The identity of the strong horse is determined by the Jewish propaganda apparatus.

    But you are wrong about their pussies. They have no fucking clue about your "empire" thing.
  117. @J.Ross
    Yes and no. Shinto is an extremely spare and accommodating faith -- it doesn't qualify as what most people think of as a "religion" and most Japanese see no contradiction in being Confucian Shinto Buddhists. The thing is, this was already made an issue hundreds of years ago, and less from Shinto exclusivity than from hostility to Christianity as recognizably foreign.

    Didn’t help that Nagasaki was the heart of Japanese Christianity. Heckuva job, Harry!

  118. @Arclight
    It's not just about demographic replacement - it's that anyone who is remotely paying attention realizes that the left intends to render whites politically irrelevant as well, even though they will be a plurality of voters/the population for quite a bit longer. With the in-your-face anti-white position of progressives, they also don't plan on treating the new political minority kindly, either.

    The GOP is a pathetic cast of neuters, but it's all that stands between us and a political coalition that cannot wait to start exacting retribution against the majority of the people in this country.

    Yes the model is the ANC in South Africa, which holds power in perpetuity.

  119. Anon[518] • Disclaimer says:
    @ziggurat
    Maybe it's due to military-related jobs. I read somewhere that the Congressional Military Industrial Complex makes sure there are jobs in all 50 states, so that Congressman are encouraged to keep up the funding.

    That sounds like Airbus assembly in Europe, where the fuselage of the planes is made in one country, the wings in another, engines in another, and final assembly in still another. It would be much more economical to just make everything in Germany, but of course that would be politically impossible.

  120. @James Speaks
    Implicit in the analysis is that white fears about other races are false, but other races fears over white dominance is validated.

    Yep, the left & democrats survive on double standards, by judging whites differently to everyone else, no matter the arena.

    Whites fearing a rising minority who openly hate white people – This fear is “unjustified”, despite demographic changes proving that it is real, despite places like South Africa & Brazil showing us what the future will be like.

    Non-whites fearing the already established white majority – This fear is “completely justified”.

    Despite the vast majority of them IMMIGRATING INTO that white majority by their own choice, despite statistics showing us that blacks & Hispanics commit FAR, FAR more violence, rapes, & murders against whites than the reverse when factoring in population share. Statistics which would be used by the left & democrats to attack white people if they were the other way around, yet whites aren’t even allowed to talk about it or we’re “racist”.

    What a lot of people don’t realise is that whites actually had a majority in South Africa at one point in time, & because of the opportunities that this civilization created, blacks kept on flooding in from greater Africa & eventually they became a 90% majority. Going on to STEAL this civilization from the the white man under the guise of “oppression”, using a lot of lefty double speak to manipulate the masses & basically encourage the white West to steal it for them by cutting off South Africa with trade & other interactions.

    But yeah, our fears of mass immigration aren’t justified…

  121. Whites were never a majority in South Africa. They made up about a quarter of the population in the 1920s and it never rose higher than that.

  122. @istevefan

    Clearly, much more lying will be necessary.
     
    And they will be lying about more than immigration. The democrats are furiously trying to win back the White working class which they wrote off in 2011. They found out the hard way that they burned some bridges too soon, and it cost them some important Great Lakes states. They know they have to win those back in 2020, so they will end up running a White Judas goat like Biden or Beto to lie to those Whites to make them believe the democrats are the democrats of old. They will downplay their true anti-White animus.

    Let's hope those Whites don't fall for it. I am not confident though, because the 2018 midterms showed that the democrats can win when the do such a strategy.

    No offense, but that’s pretty poor analysis. First, the midterms historically always swing back the other way.

    Secondly, the Republicans held most of the gains with the white working class. Where they lost ground was with the white suburbanites (especially women, ie soccer moms). You’re pro nafta, polite society republicans, if you will.

    That coupled with a solid white liberal, especially young kids, turnout due to their anger at trump solidified things for the dems.

    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    There is little stopping them from widespread fraud, illegals voting, et. al.
  123. @Jack from Brookline
    I agree with Mr. Sailer that Whites will become a minority and a powerless one.
    Whites will be a hated minority with very high rates of suicide and opioid consumption.
    More and more white women are seen with non white men everyday and this is happening in all the
    White countries except Russia and Ukraine where Indian and other South Asian men date and breed with native women to an extent.
    In Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries almost every Black guy has a White baby moma. You can check the stats for yourself.

    YOU KNOW WHO IS TO BLAME FOR ALL THIS : WHITE MEN THEMSELVES.
    Republicans like Reagan and Bush did more harm to White America(increasing legal immigration and passing the amnesty) than any Democrat or Non white will ever do.
    Bill Clinton wanted to reduce immigration in the mid 1990s and corrupt republicans killed that idea.

    Anyway, future of America is a dwindling white population that is that is breeding more and more with Blacks(white women) and Asians(white men).
    Whites won’t be even 20 percent of the population by 2100 as Democrats will ensure a borderless America after 2024.
    We went to the moon in late 60s and now we can't even decide if Trannies are mentally challneged or not.
    Reperations are being discussed for people who were never enslaved and people who never enslaved anyone are being asked to foot this boondoggle.
    Seriously, West is not even worth saving anymore.
    Be careful while bringing in more White babies to the world.

    You have a long rant describing a long trend.

    No trend lasts forever.

    Maybe the dead wood of the white forest simply needs to be burned off, along with burning off the invasive species.

  124. Nothing will change as long as interest rates are this low and stock prices are this high.

    When those thing change, so too will reverse most of the insane trends of the last 50 years, not least of which is “open borders.”

    People grossly over-estimate the ability of the Megaphone to direct public opinion. The Megaphone’s precursors existed forever…and yet history is dotted with trend changes.

    I don’t worry too much about the USA being majority-minority in 30 years. I see no way on Earth that the trends of the last ten or twenty years can sustain even another decades. The math simply doesn’t work.

    When it becomes impossible to keep sustaining this by putting it on The National MasterCard, we’ll probably see some changes. Big changes.

  125. @Desiderius
    Yeah right, I'm sure America's suburban moms are being led by those fat fucks Zucker and Stelter. They're being led by their pussies and their pussies tell them that the strong horse is the world bestriding empire and those who advocate for it.

    You only beat that by being stronger, not by whining about being dominated by people who couldn't fight their way out of a paper shtetl for centuries.

    Yeah right, I’m sure America’s suburban moms are being led by those fat fucks Zucker and Stelter. They’re being led by their pussies and their pussies tell them that the strong horse is the world bestriding empire and those who advocate for it.

    In other words, if what you said were true, you would be agreeing with me. The identity of the strong horse is determined by the Jewish propaganda apparatus.

    But you are wrong about their pussies. They have no fucking clue about your “empire” thing.

  126. @Desiderius

    The US is still run by just WASPs? Seriously?
     
    Of course. You think the Jews run Tennessee? This is about ambitious WASP soccer moms throughout all fifty states wanting their daughters and sons to rule the world, not just some piddly country:

    https://libertyunyielding.com/2019/04/08/collective-punishment-at-the-university-of-tennessee/

    Of course. You think the Jews run Tennessee? This is about ambitious WASP soccer moms throughout all fifty states wanting their daughters and sons to rule the world, not just some piddly country:

    https://libertyunyielding.com/2019/04/08/collective-punishment-at-the-university-of-tennessee/

    The Jewish community does not “run” Tennessee, but it exerts a huge degree of control over what happens there (especially uin regard to racial matters), and, yes, collective punishment is a Jewish thing, and, yes, what you see at UT is a result of public opinion formation and other social controls (incentivization, both positive and negative) by the Jewish group.

    • LOL: Desiderius
  127. @Polynikes
    No offense, but that's pretty poor analysis. First, the midterms historically always swing back the other way.

    Secondly, the Republicans held most of the gains with the white working class. Where they lost ground was with the white suburbanites (especially women, ie soccer moms). You're pro nafta, polite society republicans, if you will.

    That coupled with a solid white liberal, especially young kids, turnout due to their anger at trump solidified things for the dems.

    There is little stopping them from widespread fraud, illegals voting, et. al.

  128. White opposition to affirmative action as the beneficiaries become more numerous is quite rational, as the policy will necessarily negatively affect more whites in that case. This is so obvious it shouldn’t even need to be said. But the NYT treats the phenomenon as if it were a kind of giant priming study — the sort of study that regularly fails to replicate.

  129. @Vinteuil

    Trump and the GOPe have been focused like a laser on peeling Jewish support away from the Ds, who are frantically trying to retain it.

    They’re all desperate for an anti-Semitic foil. Don’t volunteer.
     
    I wish that I had said that.

    I mean, look - we need more Lot's, & JackD's, & syonredux's, & International Jew's, etc., on our side - not fewer. With the rise of characters like Ilhan Omar on the left, maybe we can get some more to flip. You don't do that with vinegar. You do that with honey.

    My side needs more Syons, sure. Lot doesn’t seem to be on my side. I like the guy, but he’s playing for a different team. Jack D sure as fuck isn’t on my side. He’s on Team Jew, “shill to a gonservative audience” division. Period. It isn’t even worth tallying a ratio of “Jack helping my side” to “Jack shilling among my side on behalf of Jews” comments. You need a positive number on the left side to get a ratio.

    You don’t do that with vinegar. You do that with honey.

    There’s no getting Jews on my side. That’s how race-realism works. The few exceptions like Syon (to the extent he’s actually simpatico with WNism, which I’ll leave for him to say) are apostates. I.e., no longer Jews.

  130. I’m not sure how Fisher and Taub are compensated to write this stuff without pseudonyms but it must be a _lot_ of money, they must be desperate or the perks must include wireheading.

  131. It is now about morality; survival …which will be difficult for socialists (they have been loosing in Europe since the 80’s). AND, HERE IS MY BELOVED COUNTRY:

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?