The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
NYT: It's Not Okay for Your Kids to be White
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Prof. & Mrs. Yankah

From the NYT oped section:

Can My Children Be Friends With White People?
By EKOW N. YANKAH NOV. 11, 2017

Ekow N. Yankah (@ekownyankah) is a professor at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University.

…. America is transfixed on the opioid epidemic among white Americans (who often get hooked after being overprescribed painkillers — while studies show that doctors underprescribe pain medication for African-Americans).

Uh, it took 15 years until Angus Deaton happened to have a paper on rising white death rates come out right after he won a Nobel Prize in 2015 for anybody to notice the White Death.

Likewise, despite centuries of exclusion and robust evidence of continuing racism, minority underemployment is often couched in the language of bad choices and personal responsibility.

… As against our gauzy national hopes, I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with white people is possible. When they ask, I will teach my sons that their beautiful hue is a fault line. Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside. I first have to keep my boys safe, and so I will teach them before the world shows them this particular brand of rending, violent, often fatal betrayal.

 
Hide 373 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. chinese people something not acceptable something

    Can Dan, Jason, or someone else help us out with the propaganda poster in the back?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lurker
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHepKd38pr0
    , @Philalethes
    I wonder at the inclusion of this Chinese Communist propaganda poster in this obviously posed photo (in which I note neither subject is actually looking a the camera – click on the photo for a larger version).

    My Chinese skill is rudimentary, but I believe the line on the left says "The Chinese People cannot…." Unfortunately the last character is too blurred for me to read, even enlarged. And the three characters visible on the right say "The World's People…." The characters in white on the fist's cuff say "Third World". Apparently the Third World is going to crush something – White People, perhaps? Well, what else to do with people you can't be friends with?
    , @larry lurker
    I don't really speak Chinese but I was able to figure out enough of the characters using Google Translate's drawing input feature to find the full text:

    Left text: 中国人民不可辱 = The Chinese people cannot be humiliated/insulted/abused

    Right text: 世界人民不可欺 = The people of the world cannot be bullied/cheated/taken advantage of

    The fist: 第三世界 = The Third World

    Googling the complete text, I found two things. The first was a picture of an African woman at a market looking at the same poster. Caption (auto-translated): "It seems that such 'red' posters are no stranger to people in third world countries."

    The second was a full view of the poster on Instagram where we can finally see what the Third World fist is landing on: two aggressively white men in suits, both of whom appear to be bleeding out of their heads. (Or maybe that's just supposed to represent the impact of their heads hitting the ground...)

    , @Jason Liu
    Left line: The Chinese people will not be bullied
    Center fist: The third world
    Right line: People of the world....

    Basically a communist era poster promoting third world solidarity against western imperialism
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /isteve/nyt-its-not-okay-for-your-kids-to-be-white/#comment-2075442
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside.

    So, we’re fundamentally agreed, then? Professor, it’s about cotton-pickin’ time.

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?
     
    Don’t be daft. Blacks don’t want segregation. Who’d pay for stuff then? They want to be privileged among other races, which they already are - but more. They want us to grovel for their company.
    , @Neoconned
    First I can't make it out but is his wife white? Looks that way to me...

    Second....the dude's name....is he even American? Or African? If African, why don't we just deport his insane ass back to his country of origin.....??
    , @Corvinus
    "So, we’re fundamentally agreed, then? Professor, it’s about cotton-pickin’ time. Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?"

    Mr. Sailer is essentially Yankahing your chain. The professor's position as a member of the Coalition of the Left Fringe Group is not a mainstream position. So tens of millions of us normies--white, black, brown, yellow, red--will go on with our lives, having friendships and relationships outside our racial and ethnic groups, scoffing at his notion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Mr. Blank says:

    Didn’t John Derbyshire get fired for writing essentially the same thing as this guy?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Didn’t John Derbyshire get fired for writing essentially the same thing as this guy?
     
    Derbyshire’s crime was that he was right.
    , @Forbes
    Derb was a contributor, not an employee, as such he was very publicly told his contributions were no longer needed. National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards. Cuck is the word that comes to mind. Have not read the mag or it's website since the NeverTrump issue in '15.
    , @Cloudbuster
    Actually, Derbyshire's version wasn't as extreme. He extolled the value of having a few Intelligent Well-Socialized Blacks (IWSBs) as friends, to help insulate one against charges of racism.

    That was quite a few years ago, though. I can't be bothered with the effort of that because I no longer care about being called racist, and I suspect Derbyshire doesn't care anymore, either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Langley says:

    Off Topic:

    “Russia did it” to George Takei.

    http://archive.is/tdx0I

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. So, it’s ok again to think that we are not all the same under the skin?

    Read More
    • Replies: @415 reasons
    Sure but once you hit the brain then we are all the same again.
    , @MBlanc46
    Only if you are not white.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Nope. We're all the same under the skin, except when blacks or Asians or whoever tend to outperform whites, then we're not the same under skin.

    See how simple it is. Now move along and, remember, vote GOP because while we also hate you, we don't hate you as much as the Dems. Also, under our rule, it'll take at least 20 or so years more for things to collapse.
    , @Peri
    Do we really need a black guy to tell us that, who appears to be a communist subversive? Always remember who created our civilization, boy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. What makes her think white people want to be friends with her sons?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. anon says: • Disclaimer

    Another reminder that black bodies matter;

    Barack Obama’s farewell address encouraged us to reach across partisan lines. But there is a difference between disagreeing over taxes and negotiating one’s place in America, the bodies of your children, your humanity. Our racial wound has undone love and families, and ignoring the depths of the gash will not cause it to heal.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    I get so confused about whether Jews are “white” and whether Yankah, a prof at Yeshiva, is in a way talking about Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Not Raul
    Yeah, I'm confused about that, too.

    So, it's not okay to be friends with white people; but his wife looks white. She's Jewish though, so maybe that's different.

    Is it okay to be Jewish?

    I'm just asking for a friend.
    , @Anon
    Jews are the bride at every wedding, and the corpse at every funeral.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    Read More
    • LOL: 415 reasons
    • Replies: @Anon
    I believe the husband is the professor named Ekow , not the wife . Although it's all so absurd that I may not be following.
    , @Forbes
    Apparently *his* name. Listed on Cardozo Law School website.
    , @Stationary Feast
    Sure it can. "Ekow" sounds like a perfectly normal African name to me.
    , @Anonymous
    Perhaps it's a typo and his name is actually Ewok.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TlYaupCTzBY (Ewok sound effects)
    , @CCZ
    He is a quite prolific Huff-Po, PBS, New Yorker, NY Times, You Tube, etc., etc. commentator.

    A short sample:

    July 15, 2013 New York Times - The Trayvon Martin verdict is frustrating, fracturing, angering and predictable. More than anything, for many of us, it is exhausting. Exhausting because nothing could bring back our lost child, exhausting because the verdict, which should have felt shocking, arrived with the inevitability that black Americans know too well when criminal law announces that they are worth less than other Americans. ....

    I can imagine a jurisprudence that at least begins to use racial disparities as a tool to question the constitutionality of criminal punishment

     

    https://twitter.com/ekownyankah

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/ekow-n-yankah/fergusons-easy-answers_b_5737352.html?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&ir=Black+Voices

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gsxrCVOXFQ
    , @Je Suis Charlie Martel
    She’s a Wej
    , @Negrolphin Pool
    At least he didn't choose to call himself ACOWW.
    , @Darwinian Arminian
    I think you're right; If this one's not a troll then she's doing a damned good impression. But could there be any more evidence in the name that this is all just one colossal joke? Maybe we can play around with the last name too and see what we get: "Yankah." Say it fast and I suppose one could mistake that for "Yankee" so there they are also getting in a hit at the home country too, for good measure. Or perhaps we could spell it backwards like we did the first name and get . . . . "haknay." Which actually sounds suspiciously close to "hackney," and possibly meaning that they could be using the name to tell us that not only is this one massive con job, it's also one that they're not even going to work particularly hard at since they know they can rely on the pathological altruism of rich and gullible white folks to carry them across the finish line.
    , @Eagle Eye
    Is there no African-American writer with the courage to push back against the plague of recent-immigrant locusts from Africa who piggy-back on real if ancient wrongs suffered by American blacks?

    With his obvious gift for tribal rabble-rousing and white (?) wife, Yankah could do very well as a politician in his ancestral GHANA.

    Ghana, of course, is well known as the home of "Corrupt Kofi" Annan (front man for NWO groups, father of Kojo Annan who served ably as Kofi's bagman) and countless second-tier scoundrels in international organizations.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. MG says:

    I have finally figured it out: we are living in the stupidest of times. My eternal thanks to President Trump for taking the Left over the edge.

    As a brown man who willingly immigrated to the United States 30 years ago, its appeal to me was, among other things, that it was mostly white.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. MG says:

    John Derbyshire wrote an intelligent, incisive essay on this topic and got fired for it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. We need to have a mass movement in favour of the freedom of association. The Alt Right can daydream about their ethnostate over the rainbow but the rest of us need to fight for our right not to associate with people like Ekow N. Yankah. I don’t think he has a clue how nice White people have been to him so far. I don’t think any of the “Coalition of the Ascendant” have the least frigging clue about that.

    I predict they’re going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade and they publish this? Well okay, I wouldn’t have played your hand that way but it’s your call, liberal “elite”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Most people choose not to go to Yeshiva University and associate with Prof. Yankah. Yeshiva University is a Jewish university with a mostly Jewish student body.
    , @27 year old

    predict they’re going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade
     
    They will be begging the alt-right to protect them from the normies
    , @MBlanc46
    The right of association will lead to substantial racial segregation, if not an ethnostate.
    , @AndrewR
    Reactionary thinkers seldom read the NYT. And this article will remain unknown to the low-IQ MAGAtard masses. But these things have ripple effects. The fact that the most prestigious newspaper in the entire US is publishing sewage like this does mean that the breaking point can't be far off. One extended economic depression and it's gloves off.
    , @Marty T
    Problem is most people have never heard of "freedom of association". People are so brainwashed they think "discrimination" is the worst thing in society. So it's a long fight.
    , @Anonymous
    The idea of the ethnostate is just free association writ large. And there won't be free association within a multiracial state, at least insofar as it remains democratic. Indeed, the very concept of the state sort of requires some degree of unfree-association.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Lex says:

    minority underemployment is often couched in the language of bad choices and personal responsibility.

    Instead of being blamed on immigration of unskilled workers.

    Read More
    • Agree: bomag
    • Replies: @ben tillman
    And Great Society programs that changed the local environment into that of Blacks' sub-Saharan EEA.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. nigel says:

    I continue to have hope that Steve’s citizenism is a viable option. I have to admit, articles like this in a mainstream publication make me doubt.

    Read More
    • Agree: ic1000
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    Citizenism is more Boomer inability to face the hard things that have to be done.

    The future is tribalism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Yan Shen says:

    One of the best quotes I’ve read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t. I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here’s an off topic interesting story that doesn’t involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I’ve recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey…

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html

    Japan didn’t invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to “Space War!”, a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    “Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn’t have a video game industry,” Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of “Console Wars,” says. “Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    “From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally.

    That doesn't seem to follow.
    , @Inquiring Mind
    Has a person read John Derbyshire's "The Talk"? The way it is being described on this thread has me wonder if there is a different version of it than the one I am reading https://thecampofthesaints.org/john-derbyshires-the-talk-nonblack-version/.

    One cannot think of a single Asian American equivalent to John Derbyshire? How about, say, start with John Derbyshire, who is fully Asian American in the sense that President Obama is black?
    , @Forbes
    The inference that Derb was fired for the hypothetical regarding the of raising one's son is a slander. You should be better informed or not comment is such a manner.
    , @silviosilver

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.
     
    Perhaps the fact that your people aren't held responsible for blacks' problems the way whites are plays a role in this. Asians can safely sidestep these issues and concern themselves solely with what benefits their group without anyone saying boo.
    , @anonymous

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.
     
    Asians in America are for the most part economic tourists who have come to partake in this vast market of goodies. They don't have the same view or stake in this society as the whites who brought this civilization to the new world, or the blacks whose ancestors were treated harshly.

    However, Asians in Asia seem perfectly able to grasp racial questions when their societies face threats. In 1988, Chinese students who were offended by African men dating Chinese women began the Nanjing anti-African protests. Though not as famous in the West as the Tiananmen Square protests 6 months later, these protests that began out of anger at the presence of African students in China helped spur other protests which culminated in Tiananmen Square.
    , @Moses

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.
     
    Yet Yan Shen, an Asian-American, can't stop commenting about race or mentioning his belief about East Asian HBD math/science superiority on these boards.

    Weird.

    , @AndrewR
    Plenty of orientals are race obsessed.

    See: angryasianman.com

    See: Love Life of an Asian Guy

    Most people in general don't think too much about race. But there's that 10% or so in each group to whom race seems like the most salient thing about this world.
    , @ic1000
    Yan Shen, you are perhaps misinformed. You approvingly quote these remarks about John Derbyshire's "The Talk: Nonblack Version".

    Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed [your son] to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    ...Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.
     
    Derbyshire's essay was harsh, and certain to give offense to the amour propre of its subjects. But by my reading, at no point does he wish ill on black people or damn them, as Ta-Nehesi Coates does to his white fellow citizens.
    , @Abe
    Your weird little hobbyhorse of proclaiming John Derbyshire 'the white Ta Nehisi Coates' got old over a year ago. But just to be clear since you pretend like it went over your head the first time in order to keep at it- the NATIONAL REVIEW essay that got Mr. Derbyshire 'defenestrated' was an exercise in Swiftian irony, and not something that was meant entirely literally. It was a direct response to the mean, self-deluded, self-pitying slander concocted by the most privileged blacks that death-by-cop was an immanent danger they fretted over when worrying about the fate of their sons instead of the much more common (by 1- if not 2 orders of magnitude) death-by-gang-banger-wannba over jewelry-smart phone-shoes-wallet-girl-random diss at the club. 'Barack risks his life every time he goes to the gas station' vapored our erstwhile First Lady. And beacause the Good White elite has gone on to embrace this slander and crush truth-talkers like Mr. Derbyshire, we now (by way of the passions of Saints Trayvon and Michael Brown) live in a country where death-by-homicide is 1/5 more likely nationally (and much much more likely if you have the misfortune of living in Baltimore, St. Louis, Chicago, etc.)
    , @Thomm

    I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton,
     
    er... it is pretty obvious why this is :

    i) Asian-Americans, particularly 2nd-gen or later (i.e. born in the US) are far less numerous.
    ii) Asians don't have 250 years of history behind them as a simmering dispute.
    iii) The government cannot profit from politicizing Asian identity they way it can by politicizing black identity.
    iv) Asian success is being concealed by the left, but Asians are not politically savvy enough to realize it and fight back.
    v) Blacks still (wrongly) assume that Asians will be their allies in some anti-white alliance.
    vi) Asians are not united. Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and Korean Americans don't socialize with each other.
    vii) East Asians quite readily adopt a Western first name and nominally convert to Christianity, so it is like they almost want to be invisible.

    South Asians are interesting, since they don't change their names, don't convert to Christianity, have much more experience with democracy and the English language, and are even more successful than East Asians in America. Many of the earlier ones were Republicans (Dinesh D'Souza, Bobby Jindal). But some later ones are Democrats.

    , @Twinkie

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.
     
    1. I don't think most whites are "singularly obsessed with... race." A lot of left-wing commentators and would-be activists are, but they are a tiny fraction of the population. Of course, they do set what is acceptable in public discourse for most whites, unfortunately.

    2. There ARE "Asian-Americans" who are obsessed with race, and that obsession, as such, as been pushed heavily by public institutions (of indoctrination) such as universities. The push tends to be somewhat ineffective, because Asian-American are neither united by language (as Hispanics are) nor by conception of a common race (as blacks are). Also, most Asians in America are still first- or second-generation, so they are busy assimilating and making lives for themselves, not participating in the politico-ideological struggles of the country. But that's changing (more on that another time, perhaps).

    3. To the extent that any racial group is "singularly obsessed" with race, it is blacks, or more accurately, people with any modicum of black ancestry. One can write several books on why that is, but I suppose we can summarize it with two points thusly: a) the major institutions (media, academia, etc.) encourage it and b) there are significant benefits.

    John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton
     
    I would not categorize the above individuals together for any reasonable purpose. They are very different in focus, intelligence, probity, and temperament even if they all comment on race from time to time (some more than others).
    , @unadorned
    "You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice."

    Sure, telling your son the truth will cause gross damage, yet the endless lies told to white kids from K thru college won't do a bit of harm.

    FYI: Asians are the most racist people on the planet.
    , @anonymous

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.
     
    Asians in America are for the most part economic tourists with shallow roots here. They don’t have the same view or stake in this society as the whites who brought this civilization to the new world, or the blacks whose ancestors were treated harshly.

    However, Asians in Asia seem perfectly able to grasp racial questions when their societies face threats. In 1988, Chinese students who were offended by African men dating Chinese women began the Nanjing anti-African protests. Though not as famous in the West as the Tiananmen Square protests 6 months later, these protests that began out of anger at the presence of African students in China helped spur other protests which culminated in Tiananmen Square.
    , @Bee7

    I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, ....
     
    Surely you have heard of Suey Park.

    Also:

    https://www.thoughtco.com/asian-american-civil-rights-movement-history-2834596
    , @Stationary Feast

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t. I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.
     
    Wesley Yang seems to be the man you've been missing. I think he's the only semi-famous guy who's doing this sort of thing in front of a wide audience. My impression is that Asians who view everything through a racial lens and write about it online are disproportionately women with non-Chinese Vietnamese surnames.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Jason Roberts
    Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    I believe the husband is the professor named Ekow , not the wife . Although it’s all so absurd that I may not be following.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Cagey Beast
    We need to have a mass movement in favour of the freedom of association. The Alt Right can daydream about their ethnostate over the rainbow but the rest of us need to fight for our right not to associate with people like Ekow N. Yankah. I don't think he has a clue how nice White people have been to him so far. I don't think any of the "Coalition of the Ascendant" have the least frigging clue about that.

    I predict they're going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade and they publish this? Well okay, I wouldn't have played your hand that way but it's your call, liberal "elite".

    Most people choose not to go to Yeshiva University and associate with Prof. Yankah. Yeshiva University is a Jewish university with a mostly Jewish student body.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    Good, let him be their problem and theirs alone.
    , @kaganovitch
    It's kind of complicated. Yeshiva and Cardozo law are kind of affiliated but Yeshiva is a religious school and Cardozo is adamantly not. Which gives rise to such controversies as this

    https://abovethelaw.com/2010/05/cardozo-law-school-fights-to-get-yeshiva-university-president-to-affirm-that-its-okay-to-be-gay/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Twinkie says:
    @Mr. Blank
    Didn't John Derbyshire get fired for writing essentially the same thing as this guy?

    Didn’t John Derbyshire get fired for writing essentially the same thing as this guy?

    Derbyshire’s crime was that he was right.

    Read More
    • Agree: Hail
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    That he was right and that he was white
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Forbes says:
    @Jason Roberts
    Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    Apparently *his* name. Listed on Cardozo Law School website.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    A couple of observations. First, he is not black in the sense that he is a descendant of American slavery and segregation. He appears to be an immigrant, or son of an immigrant from Ghana. Yet he seems quick to identify as an American black. Rather than suffering through slavery like the ancestors of black Americans, this man’ ancestors might have sold fellow Africans into slavery. And he has the gumption to bash whites!

    Second, if his wife is white, which I can’t tell for sure, I’d like to hear his logic at squaring the circle on that given what he just wrote.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    He's got to go back, and take his wife (is she Jewish?) and boys with him.
    , @Travis
    well stated. His wife does not appear to be Black. His children must be mulattos
    , @L Woods
    When I think of consistent, ingenuous and erudite logical discourse, the first thing I think of is grievance racketeering black male immigrants laying claim to white females.
    , @BB753
    His wife is white and I figure Jewish too. She must be very beautiful inside because the outside is not very flattering.
    , @helena
    exactly why the continued use of colours is an own goal for the right. stick to African, African-American, West Indian, British West Indian - those categories are culturally meaningful and using them will take the wind out of the sails of political correctness, simply by injecting a gleam of reality into discourse.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Twinkie says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside.
     
    So, we're fundamentally agreed, then? Professor, it's about cotton-pickin' time.

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it's the Blacks who are demanding segregation?

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?

    Don’t be daft. Blacks don’t want segregation. Who’d pay for stuff then? They want to be privileged among other races, which they already are – but more. They want us to grovel for their company.

    Read More
    • Agree: Clyde
    • Replies: @L Woods
    I suppose they're angling for a one-way segregation in which they receive an increasing litany of set asides and sinecures, while still retaining access to desirable white spaces and (likely most of all) white women. And yes, it goes without saying who will be paying for all of this.
    , @MBlanc46
    I believe that many of them do want segregation. But they also want us to continue supporting them. I think it’s the best deal that we can get.
    , @Desiderius
    Classic rentier class.
    , @TheJester
    White women with black husbands used to be the bottom of the barrel. Okay, exceptions ... but generalizations are not built on exceptions.

    However, living among the SJWs in Northern Virginia, I've noticed a social trend of late. Now, white professional women are marrying black male nationalists. They share each other's disdain for white males. How do I know this? I notice the stickers on their cars: "Black Lives Matter", "Black Power", "Black is Beautiful".

    Guess what? A sticker with, "It's Okay to be White," is not on the car.

    Their mulatto children, of course, are going to have a hard time reconciling with half of their heritage. I wonder if they will turn out like Barack Obama ... hating white people because he is not one of them and hating his mother because she birthed him with such an ambiguous identity.

    I guess the white feminist female invective against the white male patriarchy has reached such a crescendo that white males are no longer viable marriage partners for many of them. Makes sense. Once you have joined the revolutionary struggle, how can you marry a member of the white race oppressing the rest of humanity?

    However, like Rachel Dolezal, I wonder how many of them will feel when they finally face the cultural reality of black male violence and other abuses against their female partners.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/rachel-dolezal-claimed-forced-sex-tape-article-1.2261643

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-sugarmann/black-women-face-a-greate_b_4157659.html

    http://www.vpc.org/press/press-release-archive/black-women-murdered-by-men-are-most-often-killed-with-a-gun-almost-always-by-someone-they-know-according-to-new-vpc-study-released-each-year-for-domestic-violence-awareness-month-3/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/12/opinion/democrats-are-playing-checkers-while-trump-is-playing-chess.html

    White working-class Americans are “dying before their time,” [Paul Begala, a Democratic consultant and adviser to Bill Clinton] wrote in an email, specifically citing the rise in alcoholism, cirrhosis, drug addiction, overdoses, suicide and poisoning:

    If the life expectancy of, say, Somali immigrants in Minnesota suddenly took a dive, Democrats would be falling all over each other trying to ascertain the causes and advocate the cures. We owe white working-class Americans no less.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Democrats openly celebrate increased white mortality. See the Maine Democrat Party meeting video
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Moses says:

    I agree with Ms Yankah. Separation is the answer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. Forbes says:
    @Mr. Blank
    Didn't John Derbyshire get fired for writing essentially the same thing as this guy?

    Derb was a contributor, not an employee, as such he was very publicly told his contributions were no longer needed. National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards. Cuck is the word that comes to mind. Have not read the mag or it’s website since the NeverTrump issue in ’15.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Flip
    I used to read NR when I was young and stopped after WFB handed the keys to the neocons.
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    Have not read the mag or it’s website since the NeverTrump issue in ’15.
     
    I stopped when they attacked Sarah Palin. Just like many, they believe rule by graduates of Harvard and Yale are optimal. And this is at the end of the GWB reign. We'd be better off if we excluded graduates of both from public service.
    , @Art Deco
    National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards.

    Not really. Their capable contributors generally leave in accordance with ordinary attrition and are replaced, if at all, with the sort of clot he's been able to recruit the last 15 years. The four the magazine has made a public point of cutting were Joseph Sobran, John O'Sullivan, Ann Coulter, and Derbyshire. Coulter is a provacateur and said something intemperate in the heat of the moment. I'm sure Sobran fancied himself honest, but 'pig-headed crank' captures his quality rather more accurately.
    , @a reader
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. anon says: • Disclaimer

    Wonder what the gay face AI bot would think of him. If it’s so bad here, perhaps he should consider a return to Africa?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    A somewhat lob-sided choice.

    If he thinks it's so bad here we should force his return to Africa.

    Rinse and repeat 2o million times.
    , @Moses
    The only thing worse for a man like Mr. Yankah than living in a country built by racist Whites is not being allowed to immigrate to a country built by racist Whites (or being forced to leave a country built by racist Whites).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. L Woods says:
    @Twinkie

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?
     
    Don’t be daft. Blacks don’t want segregation. Who’d pay for stuff then? They want to be privileged among other races, which they already are - but more. They want us to grovel for their company.

    I suppose they’re angling for a one-way segregation in which they receive an increasing litany of set asides and sinecures, while still retaining access to desirable white spaces and (likely most of all) white women. And yes, it goes without saying who will be paying for all of this.

    Read More
    • Agree: Nico
    • Replies: @Thirdtwin
    "I suppose they’re angling for a one-way segregation in which they receive an increasing litany of set asides and sinecures..."

    IOW, it's a Reparations Cargo Cult.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. If that’s the mother of his children I doubt the kids are even half as dark as the illustration that goes with the article. Shouldn’t they have Drake’s complexion?

    Also why does he call his wife “biethnic?” That’s a new one. As is the line “white faces swept together”……like a horror movie.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CCZ
    Here is "Mrs."

    My name is Chavi Keeney Nana. I am a lawyer (international anti-corruption investigations, as well as civil trafficking suits) in Manhattan, where I also live with my husband, Ekow, and our son, Kofi. I have lived and studied abroad (UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Israel/Palestine) for significant portions of my career, come from a mixed background (Pakistani and Canadian/English/Irish), and still love traveling and exploring new places. I backpacked and hitchhiked throughout much of the Middle East, Europe, and some of Central America in my 20s and early 30s, though now tend to stay in bed and breakfasts and small homes (I am introducing my city loving husband to backpacking on a step by step basis). I love learning languages and cooking in my free time.
     
    Here is their Airbnb listed home.

    https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/7240997

    https://www.facebook.com/people/Chavi-Keeney-Nana/317465

    https://www.wilmerhale.com/chavi_nana/#!0
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Jason Roberts
    Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    Sure it can. “Ekow” sounds like a perfectly normal African name to me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Old Left says:

    I’m assuming his Jewish lesbo-looking wife is representative of the audience this screed is aimed at. Who else would give a shit?
    And I’m wondering what it is precisely he wants to protect his boys from. Employment?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. The only way to keep these people safe from white people is to exclude white people from their societies. A lot of whites would be willing to pay to be so excluded so long as they were permitted agricultural lands in flyover country from whom they could reciprocate the exclusion. Of course, the conspicuous folks complaining about “white privilege” won’t even talk terms about such a thing — with the sole exception of Louis Farrakhan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    I hope that that’s the ultimate outcome.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    This is an interesting Blind Item reveal from Crazy Days and Night in lieu of the recent Seagal allegations:

    http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/blind-items-revealed-2-anniversary-month_9.html

    The other sources for the reporter also confirmed that the dictator was proud that he had got the woman from one of his favorite actors and that he was sorry she had died because the actor would ask him about her when they saw each other. The dictator is now dead. The protection the actor is getting comes from another leader who also enjoys the company of the actor and they share the same taste in women and violence.

    Steven Seagal/Kelly LeBrock/Muammar Gaddafi/Vladimir Putin

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chrisnonymous
    From a quick Internet search, I don't see any evidence that Seagal and Gaddafi were associates. If they weren't, that entire "Blind" is bullshit.

    In looking, however, I found this, of interest to Derbyshire:

    Jennifer Lopez and Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/nicki-minaj-and-more-stars-who-hang-with-dictators
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Tacitus says:

    In Australia we have a small number of Africans. In advertisements if they have 2 children, often one is African. This is kind of ridiculous and hardly represents the average Australian setting. Very rarely do you see a white child and an Aboriginal child holding hands in an advertisement. Nor do you see an Asian or Indian child.

    Blacks have a glamour that the other boring kids don’t possess. Ridiculous.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harold
    Maybe they’re reusing US footage (and just changing the voice-over to Aussi). We started getting a lot more blacks in ads here in New Zealand, all of sudden; I believe it coincided with some change in the law, but I can’t find anything relevant with a few quick web searches.
    , @Rod1963
    It's probably ads imported from the U.S.

    It's even on the Mexican cable channels here in the U.S. as well. They just replaced the English commentator with a Mexican one. It's really odd because Mexicans do not like Blacks at all. In Los Angeles, Chicago and several East coast cities there are plenty of documented cases of ethnic cleansing of black neighborhoods by Mexicans. It's a very sensitive topic that gets no air time because it destroys the racial narrative that the elites have pushed that the whites are the cause of all problems.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. The White Death doesn’t really exist the way Sailer thinks it does, is one reason why. Deaton and Case’s work of course was severely flawed from the start. It’s not like they collected any data properly themselves and they made major mistakes in analyzing it. Here are some summaries.

    All of the discrepancies and then some that people are claiming exist in the 2000s era are actually, in hard numbers, accounted for by the deaths of military veterans, disproportionately white US adults, some in direct action in the War in Iraq and “War on Terror” but plenty in related circumstances that always result from wartime like suicide. Remember that adult white male death rates didn’t meaningfully increase, even with this decade-plus effect. Of course both the media and political establishment don’t like emphasizing this, and I guess a few partisan sources never put two and two together on reporting when they do talk about this, but don’t realize the huge effects on death rates. (Remember that so few young people, like under age 60, die in the first place, that any shocks such as military deaths can cause huge percentage point effects. As one example, that came up long ago in looking at numbers like these, the 9/11 attacks just about doubled the homicide rate, which is how it’s weirdly counted, for groups adult white males for a year-remember working age white adults were the modal victims of 9/11)

    Only somewhere in the tens millions of the leftwing, anti-war voters and Bernie supporters and so on could have told you this for fifteen years.

    While it is a little curious to suppose there is otherwise some novel discrepancy with white female adult death rates, there are a host of other factors including professional practice on the medicine end and data collection unaccounted for. Also, there are extremely subtle and complicated effects in both health and demography that could lead to counterintuitive results such as a decrease in childhood death rate that shows back up at older ages eventually, ceteris paribus. If someone with severe birth defects, for instance including Down Syndrome used to die at age 5, and now dies at age 40 in present-day society, that skews statistics.

    Lastly but at least second-most importantly, it’s quite possible that bias in the US Census (which the organization freely admits often exist, and in fact the alt-right constantly assumes in other circumstances) has thrown off the objectively small percentage changes in death rates and whatnot that this is all about. The data sources are completely different, not necessarily reliable, and any error there would overwhelm all other effects. Instead of the number of deaths being meaningfully different, it could be the estimates of population that went wrong (and again, the Census often claims errors of 3-5% in measuring white vis-a-vis non-Hispanic white population)

    So, the much vaunted drug epidemic really mostly took off after 2010 and it’s still not clear there that changes in data collection and attention don’t make up a lot of the statistical hubbub compared to something like 50 years ago. We can’t trust data from back then; doctors, families, etc would and did to an unknown extent coverup when people died of drugs or suicide or something and it would be attributed to other causes. It’s possible the Internet age and changes in culture and technology are what changed the final data reporting, with nothing being qualitatively different from the past.

    Other than the few hundred people, in different age range groups than everyone made a fuss abou, in a few geographically concentrated areas a year the opiod epidemic has little large scale impact on deaths per se and isn’t necessarily meaningfully different from other drug epidemics in the past. Nor is it even different from other pathologies common in the US from car accidents to homicide when compared on an international scale.

    Incidentally, though this has been said before, all the propaganda about the white “lower class” and their drug addictions and all in the media is a nonsensical effort to distract from the fact that the white “middle class” also has strongly shifted to the Republican party in the last few years. Even Sailer himself didn’t know the numbers or made the wrong estimate; the white middle class went more R in 2012, 2014, and 2016 than MSM propagandists are trying to claim and erase.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    Glad to see you are up for increased deaths among whites. Your rich, billionaire, betters thank you. After all, what would the republic do without your reference-free, fact-free, stream-of-consciousness clairvoyant analysis, and cuck-suck-serving post?
    , @eD
    This is actually an interesting comment, but then you get articles like this:

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/12/08/504667607/life-expectancy-in-u-s-drops-for-first-time-in-decades-report-finds

    This is from NPR, which is not exactly known for samizadat.

    Granted, when I googled "life expectancy in the US", I immediately got the answer that it is 78.8 years, which I dont't think it has ever been, and has been rising, and has never declined, though I remember several articles about the decline in life expectancy last year and the year before, but who knows? I think something has been going on.
    , @TangoMan
    All of the discrepancies and then some that people are claiming exist in the 2000s era are actually, in hard numbers, accounted for by the deaths of military veterans, disproportionately white US adults, some in direct action in the War in Iraq and “War on Terror” but plenty in related circumstances that always result from wartime like suicide.

    Then let's break this down and look only at suicides over the last 15 year and restrict the age range to those between 40 and 59, the time of middle aged despair.

    Data from the Centers for Disease Control.

    Sure looks like an increase both White men and women.

    https://imgur.com/a/ydzrR
    https://imgur.com/a/TEjv7
    https://imgur.com/a/v2Jox
    , @anon
    tl/dr, but...down in hopelessly cucked Australia, the Federal Government is ending over the counter access to anything containing Codeine from February 1, 2018.
    GlaxoSmithKline have confirmed that Panadeine and Panamax won't be supplied after that date.

    People requiring pain relief will have to consult a Medical Practitioner [who obviously won't be writing a scrip for anything containing Codeine].

    The ban has bipartisan political support.

    My question is: did something similar happen in the U.S. in the recent past, and if so, could Australians expect an Opioid Epidemic in the future?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Would be funny to watch him and G.T. Coates interacting at a media cocktail party.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logical Meme
    Methinx the word "body" would get used every 5th word.
    , @Father O'Hara
    They'd probably hate each other.
    "These are MY white folks!"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @james wilson
    So, it's ok again to think that we are not all the same under the skin?

    Sure but once you hit the brain then we are all the same again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. CCZ says:

    So henceforth, I (as an “It’s OK To Be White”) can invert and say:

    “… As against our gauzy national hopes, I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with BLACK people is possible. When they ask, I will teach my sons that their beautiful hue is a fault line. Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside. I first have to keep my boys safe, and so I will teach them before the world shows them this particular brand of rending, violent, often fatal betrayal.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Exactly! Now let's see if NYT will ever publish it. Shit, they will probably even delete it from their comments.
    , @Twinkie
    You should invert the sex, too (i.e. “keep my boys safe” to “keep my girls safe”).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jason Roberts
    Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    Perhaps it’s a typo and his name is actually Ewok.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TlYaupCTzBY (Ewok sound effects)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Lurker says:
    @Stationary Feast

    chinese people something not acceptable something
     
    Can Dan, Jason, or someone else help us out with the propaganda poster in the back?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Mr. Blank
    Didn't John Derbyshire get fired for writing essentially the same thing as this guy?

    Actually, Derbyshire’s version wasn’t as extreme. He extolled the value of having a few Intelligent Well-Socialized Blacks (IWSBs) as friends, to help insulate one against charges of racism.

    That was quite a few years ago, though. I can’t be bothered with the effort of that because I no longer care about being called racist, and I suspect Derbyshire doesn’t care anymore, either.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Derbyshire has non-white children (Chinese). How can he tell these non-white children not to be friends or date other non-whites (i.e., blacks)?

    Yankah's wife is Jewish and according to Jewish law the offspring are Jewish.

    Derbyshire is a semitophile. He should have no problem with Jews like these.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Who will be the first to have the guts to just come out and say that white Gentiles should be shot on sight?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. @Stationary Feast

    chinese people something not acceptable something
     
    Can Dan, Jason, or someone else help us out with the propaganda poster in the back?

    I wonder at the inclusion of this Chinese Communist propaganda poster in this obviously posed photo (in which I note neither subject is actually looking a the camera – click on the photo for a larger version).

    My Chinese skill is rudimentary, but I believe the line on the left says “The Chinese People cannot….” Unfortunately the last character is too blurred for me to read, even enlarged. And the three characters visible on the right say “The World’s People….” The characters in white on the fist’s cuff say “Third World”. Apparently the Third World is going to crush something – White People, perhaps? Well, what else to do with people you can’t be friends with?

    Read More
    • Replies: @JimB
    The poster says “Chinese people can’t be insulted. Third World.”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally.

    That doesn’t seem to follow.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. JohnnyD says:

    The NYT editorial page is turning into therapy sessions for delusional minorities…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  44. @Cagey Beast
    We need to have a mass movement in favour of the freedom of association. The Alt Right can daydream about their ethnostate over the rainbow but the rest of us need to fight for our right not to associate with people like Ekow N. Yankah. I don't think he has a clue how nice White people have been to him so far. I don't think any of the "Coalition of the Ascendant" have the least frigging clue about that.

    I predict they're going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade and they publish this? Well okay, I wouldn't have played your hand that way but it's your call, liberal "elite".

    predict they’re going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade

    They will be begging the alt-right to protect them from the normies

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    A huge shakeup is coming, whether people want it or not, and the NYT reading types are going to eventually look upon the recent Alt Right and /pol/ pranks with nostalgia.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. George says:

    “who often get hooked after being overprescribed painkillers ”

    An alternative theory for drug use, at least at the start, is so they can go back to work. If you don’t have disability your only alternative is opioids. Meth is also used by very low-income workers to increase the hours they work.

    Partially pushed by trial lawyers, the over prescription theory of drug abuse is convenient because it means they can sue pharmaceutical companies and distributors not to mention doctors. Also not mentioned is that a consequence of the US occupation of Afghanistan is it is impossible to control opium production there, as it is said to have been when the Taliban were in control. Invade the world, invite the world, opiate the world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @415 reasons
    Most heroin in the U.S. comes from Latin America, and the second most important source of overdoses are synthetic fentanyl and related drugs from China.

    Heroin from all four source areas (Mexico, South America, Southwest Asia, and Southeast Asia) is available to varying degrees; however, analysis of DEA heroin indicator programs data, production and cultivation estimates, and seizure data indicates Mexico is the predominant source
    of heroin in the United States. South America is the second most common source of heroin. Smaller amounts of Southwest Asian heroin are available in certain areas, but most Southwest Asian heroin supplies markets in Africa, Asia, and Europe.
     
    https://www.dea.gov/resource-center/2016%20NDTA%20Summary.pdf
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. I’m imagining Mrs. Yankah as in possession of a gargantuan case of self-hatred. Imagine how she must humiliate herself daily to prove herself worthy of being Mr. Yankah’s wife despite her racist white skin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius

    I’m imagining Mrs. Yankah as in possession of a gargantuan case of self-hatred.
     
    You lead a rich fantasy life then.

    She hates herself about as much as Steve hates golf.
    , @Alden
    I thought the jewish ultra left women who pursued black men just because they were black ended about 40 years ago. She doesn't hate herself. She hates Whites so much she decided to produce more blacks.

    Maybe she hopes her sons will be Senators and Presidents like Obama. Her background must be very interesting. I wonder if her grandma was one of those Jewish girls who joined the Prison Law Project to entice the black criminals to join the revolution.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. CCZ says:
    @Jason Roberts
    Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    He is a quite prolific Huff-Po, PBS, New Yorker, NY Times, You Tube, etc., etc. commentator.

    A short sample:

    July 15, 2013 New York Times – The Trayvon Martin verdict is frustrating, fracturing, angering and predictable. More than anything, for many of us, it is exhausting. Exhausting because nothing could bring back our lost child, exhausting because the verdict, which should have felt shocking, arrived with the inevitability that black Americans know too well when criminal law announces that they are worth less than other Americans. ….

    I can imagine a jurisprudence that at least begins to use racial disparities as a tool to question the constitutionality of criminal punishment

    https://twitter.com/ekownyankah

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/ekow-n-yankah/fergusons-easy-answers_b_5737352.html?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&ir=Black+Voices

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    I had quite voluminous discussions at the time with abrasive white progs. There were two features of their thinking on the case (not that they were quite self-conscious about them):


    1. Zimmerman himself had no palpable reality in their mind. He was a character in a narrative whose acts and motives could be whatever the narrator (obnoxious white progs) elected to impute to him.

    2. Implicit in the stances they did take was the notion that black youth properly had a franchise to beat up people who irritated them, and if you were a peasant who got beaten up, that's your fault.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. Art Deco says:

    Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside. I first have to keep my boys safe, and so I will teach them before the world shows them this particular brand of rending, violent, often fatal betrayal.

    Thomas Perez has admitted he applied to law school in lieu of any other sort of post-baccalaureate schooling because he was bad at math. In Prof. Ekow’s case, this is manifest in not understanding simple descriptive statistics, e.g those which demonstrate that the lifetime probability of a black male dying via homicide is 4% but which also demonstrate that the share of those homicides committed by white Anglos (who form 63% of the population) is … 5%.

    Read More
    • LOL: Johann Ricke
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  49. Svigor says:

    Written by Woke Haknay? Do I have that right?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    Has a person read John Derbyshire’s “The Talk”? The way it is being described on this thread has me wonder if there is a different version of it than the one I am reading https://thecampofthesaints.org/john-derbyshires-the-talk-nonblack-version/.

    One cannot think of a single Asian American equivalent to John Derbyshire? How about, say, start with John Derbyshire, who is fully Asian American in the sense that President Obama is black?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    John Derbyshire's wife is Chinese, not his father.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. We are living the movie Idiocracy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  52. Svigor says:

    Oh, wait, the author is black?

    So it’s Woke N-word Haknay?

    Seriously?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChrisZ
    Alternatively, Svigor, the last name could be read as a “rapper” pronunciation of “Yanker,” as in “one who yanks your chain.”

    If you’re suggesting this is yet another hoax, I have to say the suggestion has merit. All the little ironies mentioned here—the name, the Commie poster, the wife, the parallel to Derbyshire’s 2012 piece, the berth at Cardozo Law School—are just too perfect: like items on a treasure hunt for iSteve readers.

    It would have to be an extremely elaborate hoax, involving a lot of internet hacking to produce the results listed throughout this comment thread. And it fooled the New York Times. But that would be part of the point: that nobody these days bothers to confirm matters of fact or identity beyond a rudimentary internet search.

    Compared to the other hoaxes we read about in this forum, this one (if it is one) would have a level of execution well above the amateur-hour antics of grad students, magazine writers, or Air Force academy cadets.

    Could it be the work of a clever alt-Righter? Or the Russians? (I’m being sarcastic with the last, but not the first.)

    Then again, if Woke Yanker is for real, then it’s more evidence that today’s Left is truly beyond parody.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Stew says:

    I seem to be in a bit of a pickle here. My oldest child is mixed race. Who is she allowed to be friends with?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. Forbes says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    The inference that Derb was fired for the hypothetical regarding the of raising one’s son is a slander. You should be better informed or not comment is such a manner.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Svigor says:

    Japanese PC games suck. Like 5 good PC games have come out of Japan in the last decade. Even those were probably all shitty, lazy ports.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. MBlanc46 says:
    @james wilson
    So, it's ok again to think that we are not all the same under the skin?

    Only if you are not white.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Jason Liu says:

    Honestly I don’t see the media being “transfixed” with the opioid epidemic. It gets passing mention, just like the cocaine epidemic in black communities before. There’s a kind of “woe is me why didn’t they care about the blacks” BS going on there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  58. MBlanc46 says:
    @Cagey Beast
    We need to have a mass movement in favour of the freedom of association. The Alt Right can daydream about their ethnostate over the rainbow but the rest of us need to fight for our right not to associate with people like Ekow N. Yankah. I don't think he has a clue how nice White people have been to him so far. I don't think any of the "Coalition of the Ascendant" have the least frigging clue about that.

    I predict they're going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade and they publish this? Well okay, I wouldn't have played your hand that way but it's your call, liberal "elite".

    The right of association will lead to substantial racial segregation, if not an ethnostate.

    Read More
    • Agree: Cagey Beast
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Dumbo says:

    “gauzy”? Does he mean “gaudy”? Or… Well, I don’t know. I hadn’t even seen that word before, but it exists.

    gauz·y
    adjective
    resembling gauze; thin and translucent.
    “a gauzy dress”
    synonyms: translucent, transparent, sheer, see-through, fine, delicate, flimsy, filmy, gossamer, diaphanous, chiffony, wispy, thin, light, insubstantial, floaty
    “a gauzy summer fabric”

    I am not racist, but I don’t have any black friends. Well I hardly have any friends at all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. MBlanc46 says:
    @Twinkie

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?
     
    Don’t be daft. Blacks don’t want segregation. Who’d pay for stuff then? They want to be privileged among other races, which they already are - but more. They want us to grovel for their company.

    I believe that many of them do want segregation. But they also want us to continue supporting them. I think it’s the best deal that we can get.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.

    Perhaps the fact that your people aren’t held responsible for blacks’ problems the way whites are plays a role in this. Asians can safely sidestep these issues and concern themselves solely with what benefits their group without anyone saying boo.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. MBlanc46 says:
    @James Bowery
    The only way to keep these people safe from white people is to exclude white people from their societies. A lot of whites would be willing to pay to be so excluded so long as they were permitted agricultural lands in flyover country from whom they could reciprocate the exclusion. Of course, the conspicuous folks complaining about "white privilege" won't even talk terms about such a thing -- with the sole exception of Louis Farrakhan.

    I hope that that’s the ultimate outcome.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. @anon
    Wonder what the gay face AI bot would think of him. If it's so bad here, perhaps he should consider a return to Africa?

    A somewhat lob-sided choice.

    If he thinks it’s so bad here we should force his return to Africa.

    Rinse and repeat 2o million times.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Flip says:
    @Forbes
    Derb was a contributor, not an employee, as such he was very publicly told his contributions were no longer needed. National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards. Cuck is the word that comes to mind. Have not read the mag or it's website since the NeverTrump issue in '15.

    I used to read NR when I was young and stopped after WFB handed the keys to the neocons.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. anon says: • Disclaimer

    This summer’s images of violence in Charlottesville, Va., prompted an array of questions.

    I’m assuming he’s referring to the images of Deandre Harris hitting someone over the head with a Mag-Lite, or that other black guy shooting a homemade flamethrower at people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  66. @Anonymous
    Most people choose not to go to Yeshiva University and associate with Prof. Yankah. Yeshiva University is a Jewish university with a mostly Jewish student body.

    Good, let him be their problem and theirs alone.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.

    Asians in America are for the most part economic tourists who have come to partake in this vast market of goodies. They don’t have the same view or stake in this society as the whites who brought this civilization to the new world, or the blacks whose ancestors were treated harshly.

    However, Asians in Asia seem perfectly able to grasp racial questions when their societies face threats. In 1988, Chinese students who were offended by African men dating Chinese women began the Nanjing anti-African protests. Though not as famous in the West as the Tiananmen Square protests 6 months later, these protests that began out of anger at the presence of African students in China helped spur other protests which culminated in Tiananmen Square.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @27 year old

    predict they’re going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade
     
    They will be begging the alt-right to protect them from the normies

    A huge shakeup is coming, whether people want it or not, and the NYT reading types are going to eventually look upon the recent Alt Right and /pol/ pranks with nostalgia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    There's a line of thought going around in some circles that the white SJWs are going to go absolutely insane with rage towards their colored allies when the SJWs realise how they're never going to be forgiven for being white.

    The AR/Hotep "alliance" is moving from entertaining meme fodder to a real thing for that reason.

    , @Anonymous
    They'll just smile, say "we were only joking", and go back to hiding their hostility. It'll work too, since whites have the collective memory of goldfish.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @anonymous
    A couple of observations. First, he is not black in the sense that he is a descendant of American slavery and segregation. He appears to be an immigrant, or son of an immigrant from Ghana. Yet he seems quick to identify as an American black. Rather than suffering through slavery like the ancestors of black Americans, this man' ancestors might have sold fellow Africans into slavery. And he has the gumption to bash whites!

    Second, if his wife is white, which I can't tell for sure, I'd like to hear his logic at squaring the circle on that given what he just wrote.

    He’s got to go back, and take his wife (is she Jewish?) and boys with him.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @Stationary Feast

    chinese people something not acceptable something
     
    Can Dan, Jason, or someone else help us out with the propaganda poster in the back?

    I don’t really speak Chinese but I was able to figure out enough of the characters using Google Translate’s drawing input feature to find the full text:

    Left text: 中国人民不可辱 = The Chinese people cannot be humiliated/insulted/abused

    Right text: 世界人民不可欺 = The people of the world cannot be bullied/cheated/taken advantage of

    The fist: 第三世界 = The Third World

    Googling the complete text, I found two things. The first was a picture of an African woman at a market looking at the same poster. Caption (auto-translated): “It seems that such ‘red’ posters are no stranger to people in third world countries.”

    The second was a full view of the poster on Instagram where we can finally see what the Third World fist is landing on: two aggressively white men in suits, both of whom appear to be bleeding out of their heads. (Or maybe that’s just supposed to represent the impact of their heads hitting the ground…)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill P
    The American left is indeed Maoist. That's a very racially aggressive poster. Why not turn that racial aggression on its main proponents: the white billionaires who run this country, and those in California in particular?

    We deplorables are a hard, meagre target. Well-armed, impecunious and irredeemable (according to the left). We also might not care if POC seize some beachside estates in Malibu and Marin County.

    If we were really deplorable, what we'd do is agitate the Maoists into a frenzy in their breeding grounds, and turn them loose on their wealthy, liberal neighbors.

    Morally, that sounds pretty bad, but one of these days some of our people are going to start asking "why not?" If the elites really hate us so much, then who are our real enemies? The aimless brown masses or their duplicitous would-be masters who want to use them to crush us? I think we're starting to figure out the answer to that.
    , @Chrisnonymous
    Thanks!
    , @a reader
    Congratulations for your successful and enlightening sleuth's work !
    , @Jack D
    The two bleeding white guys at the bottom are US imperialism 美帝 and Soviet revisionism 苏修 who are both being smashed by the red fist of 3rd world (including China).

    I assume the prof or his wife have the poster up in their home or office in a supposedly cool or ironic way but it's actually very telling as to their true wishes. Would they put up a Nazi poster showing bleeding Jews and Bolsheviks being smashed by an Aryan fist in a cool or ironic way?

    The Left is all about projection - when he says that he is worried about white people physically hurting his children, it's because he knows that if the situation was reversed (e.g. Zimbabwe) then white children would be in physical danger from blacks.
    , @Eagle Eye
    Nice sleuthing!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    As usual, blacks want to eat the cake and have it too. They want to be racialists but, knowing deep down that they won’t be able to sustain the prosperity on their own, they vehemently oppose to whites wanting to be openly racialists.

    If there were no double standard, I’d applaud the guy and say “great, works for me, let’s both do it this way”. But since the double standard is basically a defining feature of our nation today, the guy is just another parasite seeking to prosper off whites’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @CCZ
    So henceforth, I (as an "It's OK To Be White") can invert and say:

    "… As against our gauzy national hopes, I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with BLACK people is possible. When they ask, I will teach my sons that their beautiful hue is a fault line. Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside. I first have to keep my boys safe, and so I will teach them before the world shows them this particular brand of rending, violent, often fatal betrayal."

    Exactly! Now let’s see if NYT will ever publish it. Shit, they will probably even delete it from their comments.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. @Forbes
    Derb was a contributor, not an employee, as such he was very publicly told his contributions were no longer needed. National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards. Cuck is the word that comes to mind. Have not read the mag or it's website since the NeverTrump issue in '15.

    Have not read the mag or it’s website since the NeverTrump issue in ’15.

    I stopped when they attacked Sarah Palin. Just like many, they believe rule by graduates of Harvard and Yale are optimal. And this is at the end of the GWB reign. We’d be better off if we excluded graduates of both from public service.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @Elmer T. Jones
    Would be funny to watch him and G.T. Coates interacting at a media cocktail party.

    Methinx the word “body” would get used every 5th word.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. AndrewR says:
    @Cagey Beast
    We need to have a mass movement in favour of the freedom of association. The Alt Right can daydream about their ethnostate over the rainbow but the rest of us need to fight for our right not to associate with people like Ekow N. Yankah. I don't think he has a clue how nice White people have been to him so far. I don't think any of the "Coalition of the Ascendant" have the least frigging clue about that.

    I predict they're going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade and they publish this? Well okay, I wouldn't have played your hand that way but it's your call, liberal "elite".

    Reactionary thinkers seldom read the NYT. And this article will remain unknown to the low-IQ MAGAtard masses. But these things have ripple effects. The fact that the most prestigious newspaper in the entire US is publishing sewage like this does mean that the breaking point can’t be far off. One extended economic depression and it’s gloves off.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EriK

    low-IQ MAGAtard masses
     
    WTF?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Not Raul says:
    @Anon
    I get so confused about whether Jews are "white" and whether Yankah, a prof at Yeshiva, is in a way talking about Jews.

    Yeah, I’m confused about that, too.

    So, it’s not okay to be friends with white people; but his wife looks white. She’s Jewish though, so maybe that’s different.

    Is it okay to be Jewish?

    I’m just asking for a friend.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Travis says:
    @anonymous
    A couple of observations. First, he is not black in the sense that he is a descendant of American slavery and segregation. He appears to be an immigrant, or son of an immigrant from Ghana. Yet he seems quick to identify as an American black. Rather than suffering through slavery like the ancestors of black Americans, this man' ancestors might have sold fellow Africans into slavery. And he has the gumption to bash whites!

    Second, if his wife is white, which I can't tell for sure, I'd like to hear his logic at squaring the circle on that given what he just wrote.

    well stated. His wife does not appear to be Black. His children must be mulattos

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Joe Walker says: • Website

    I wonder if the New York Times would have a problem with an article titled: “Can My Children Be Friends With Jewish People?”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  79. Harold says:
    @Tacitus
    In Australia we have a small number of Africans. In advertisements if they have 2 children, often one is African. This is kind of ridiculous and hardly represents the average Australian setting. Very rarely do you see a white child and an Aboriginal child holding hands in an advertisement. Nor do you see an Asian or Indian child.

    Blacks have a glamour that the other boring kids don’t possess. Ridiculous.

    Maybe they’re reusing US footage (and just changing the voice-over to Aussi). We started getting a lot more blacks in ads here in New Zealand, all of sudden; I believe it coincided with some change in the law, but I can’t find anything relevant with a few quick web searches.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Harold says:

    ‘debate, not division.’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  81. Moses says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.

    Yet Yan Shen, an Asian-American, can’t stop commenting about race or mentioning his belief about East Asian HBD math/science superiority on these boards.

    Weird.

    Read More
    • Agree: reiner Tor
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. AndrewR says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    Plenty of orientals are race obsessed.

    See: angryasianman.com

    See: Love Life of an Asian Guy

    Most people in general don’t think too much about race. But there’s that 10% or so in each group to whom race seems like the most salient thing about this world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    But there’s that 10% or so in each group to whom race seems like the most salient thing about this world.
     
    This is true of about 70% of blacks, but about 10-20% of whites (these whites become the WN wiggers that we see here).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. AndrewR says:
    @Twinkie

    Didn’t John Derbyshire get fired for writing essentially the same thing as this guy?
     
    Derbyshire’s crime was that he was right.

    That he was right and that he was white

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. @Krastos the Gluemaker
    The White Death doesn't really exist the way Sailer thinks it does, is one reason why. Deaton and Case's work of course was severely flawed from the start. It's not like they collected any data properly themselves and they made major mistakes in analyzing it. Here are some summaries.

    All of the discrepancies and then some that people are claiming exist in the 2000s era are actually, in hard numbers, accounted for by the deaths of military veterans, disproportionately white US adults, some in direct action in the War in Iraq and "War on Terror" but plenty in related circumstances that always result from wartime like suicide. Remember that adult white male death rates didn't meaningfully increase, even with this decade-plus effect. Of course both the media and political establishment don't like emphasizing this, and I guess a few partisan sources never put two and two together on reporting when they do talk about this, but don't realize the huge effects on death rates. (Remember that so few young people, like under age 60, die in the first place, that any shocks such as military deaths can cause huge percentage point effects. As one example, that came up long ago in looking at numbers like these, the 9/11 attacks just about doubled the homicide rate, which is how it's weirdly counted, for groups adult white males for a year-remember working age white adults were the modal victims of 9/11)

    Only somewhere in the tens millions of the leftwing, anti-war voters and Bernie supporters and so on could have told you this for fifteen years.

    While it is a little curious to suppose there is otherwise some novel discrepancy with white female adult death rates, there are a host of other factors including professional practice on the medicine end and data collection unaccounted for. Also, there are extremely subtle and complicated effects in both health and demography that could lead to counterintuitive results such as a decrease in childhood death rate that shows back up at older ages eventually, ceteris paribus. If someone with severe birth defects, for instance including Down Syndrome used to die at age 5, and now dies at age 40 in present-day society, that skews statistics.

    Lastly but at least second-most importantly, it's quite possible that bias in the US Census (which the organization freely admits often exist, and in fact the alt-right constantly assumes in other circumstances) has thrown off the objectively small percentage changes in death rates and whatnot that this is all about. The data sources are completely different, not necessarily reliable, and any error there would overwhelm all other effects. Instead of the number of deaths being meaningfully different, it could be the estimates of population that went wrong (and again, the Census often claims errors of 3-5% in measuring white vis-a-vis non-Hispanic white population)

    So, the much vaunted drug epidemic really mostly took off after 2010 and it's still not clear there that changes in data collection and attention don't make up a lot of the statistical hubbub compared to something like 50 years ago. We can't trust data from back then; doctors, families, etc would and did to an unknown extent coverup when people died of drugs or suicide or something and it would be attributed to other causes. It's possible the Internet age and changes in culture and technology are what changed the final data reporting, with nothing being qualitatively different from the past.

    Other than the few hundred people, in different age range groups than everyone made a fuss abou, in a few geographically concentrated areas a year the opiod epidemic has little large scale impact on deaths per se and isn't necessarily meaningfully different from other drug epidemics in the past. Nor is it even different from other pathologies common in the US from car accidents to homicide when compared on an international scale.

    Incidentally, though this has been said before, all the propaganda about the white "lower class" and their drug addictions and all in the media is a nonsensical effort to distract from the fact that the white "middle class" also has strongly shifted to the Republican party in the last few years. Even Sailer himself didn't know the numbers or made the wrong estimate; the white middle class went more R in 2012, 2014, and 2016 than MSM propagandists are trying to claim and erase.

    Glad to see you are up for increased deaths among whites. Your rich, billionaire, betters thank you. After all, what would the republic do without your reference-free, fact-free, stream-of-consciousness clairvoyant analysis, and cuck-suck-serving post?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. AndrewR says:
    @Anonymous
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/12/opinion/democrats-are-playing-checkers-while-trump-is-playing-chess.html

    White working-class Americans are “dying before their time,” [Paul Begala, a Democratic consultant and adviser to Bill Clinton] wrote in an email, specifically citing the rise in alcoholism, cirrhosis, drug addiction, overdoses, suicide and poisoning:

    If the life expectancy of, say, Somali immigrants in Minnesota suddenly took a dive, Democrats would be falling all over each other trying to ascertain the causes and advocate the cures. We owe white working-class Americans no less.
     

     

    Democrats openly celebrate increased white mortality. See the Maine Democrat Party meeting video

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Moses says:
    @anon
    Wonder what the gay face AI bot would think of him. If it's so bad here, perhaps he should consider a return to Africa?

    The only thing worse for a man like Mr. Yankah than living in a country built by racist Whites is not being allowed to immigrate to a country built by racist Whites (or being forced to leave a country built by racist Whites).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. e says:

    Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside.

    Finally, someone admits publicly we are NOT “the same on the inside.” Yes, there are trivial and not-so-trivial biological differences between the races.

    Now, Professor, you concur, but are you willing to talk about those biological differences? We are.

    We start the conversation by making people understand the basics of natural selection.

    Let us begin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harold
    He isn’t admitting that. He’s just saying that he doesn’t care, given the reality of white ‘dominance’ and ‘racism’ and his priority to keep his sons safe.

    That’s how I read it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. @Jason Roberts
    Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    She’s a Wej

    Read More
    • Replies: @Je Suis Charlie Martel
    The efiw I mean
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. ic1000 says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    Yan Shen, you are perhaps misinformed. You approvingly quote these remarks about John Derbyshire’s “The Talk: Nonblack Version”.

    Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed [your son] to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    …Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    Derbyshire’s essay was harsh, and certain to give offense to the amour propre of its subjects. But by my reading, at no point does he wish ill on black people or damn them, as Ta-Nehesi Coates does to his white fellow citizens.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yan Shen
    I don't think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans. He mostly blames them for the woes afflicting black America and repeatedly urges white Americans to be more open about their supposed privilege and racism.

    Now I agree that all of this seems rather misguided. However, TNC's crime isn't so much that he's wrong, but that he obsesses over race constantly in an unproductive fashion. The fact that society fawns over him for doing so, as correctly observed in the quote above, really sticks in some people's craw. It's mind boggling how anyone could think that anything TNC has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight.

    John Derbyshire, while he may be narrowly speaking correct on the facts, turns off some people not because he's wrong or politically incorrect, but because some of us don't see the productive value in basically shouting endlessly from the top of your lungs, over and over again, to anyone within 100 miles willing to listen that on average blacks are less intelligent and more prone to violence compared to members of other ethnic groups. This doesn't seem like a particularly constructive way for blacks and whites to move forward, hand in hand, as Mr. Derbyshire often likes to say. Rather it seems like a great way to piss people off.

    A man of Mr. Derbyshire's intellect should be able to more smartly and constructively get his points across, in a way more likely to lead to tangible action.

    As I like to say, there are three things certain in this world, death, taxes, and Mr. Derbyshire warning us week after week after week after week about the Black Menace!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Dr. X says:

    It’s not OK for your kids to be white… but it sure is noble and pure and holy and salutary to have Negro drag queens host Story Hour for your five-year-old white kindergarteners…

    https://www.dragqueenstoryhour.org/

    Read More
    • Replies: @a reader
    Thanks for the instructive link; they appear to peddle their ware exclusively to White and Asian kids. For some reason, the lack of POC among the audience is not noticed, much less lamented by the enthousiastic reporters.

    As is always the case when degeneracy is involved, the E-S-T rule applies.

    However, couldn't we too make good use of the conclusion line ? [at 0:55]

    If it's not for you, you don't have to come.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. @Je Suis Charlie Martel
    She’s a Wej

    The efiw I mean

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Derbyshire’s essay was harsh, and certain to give offense to the amour propre of its subjects. But by my reading, at no point does he wish ill on black people or damn them, as Ta-Nehesi Coates does to his white fellow citizens.

    Kato’s a bit oily. Everything Derb says about blacks is accurate. Everything Coates says is bullshit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  93. L Woods says:
    @anonymous
    A couple of observations. First, he is not black in the sense that he is a descendant of American slavery and segregation. He appears to be an immigrant, or son of an immigrant from Ghana. Yet he seems quick to identify as an American black. Rather than suffering through slavery like the ancestors of black Americans, this man' ancestors might have sold fellow Africans into slavery. And he has the gumption to bash whites!

    Second, if his wife is white, which I can't tell for sure, I'd like to hear his logic at squaring the circle on that given what he just wrote.

    When I think of consistent, ingenuous and erudite logical discourse, the first thing I think of is grievance racketeering black male immigrants laying claim to white females.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @Twinkie

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?
     
    Don’t be daft. Blacks don’t want segregation. Who’d pay for stuff then? They want to be privileged among other races, which they already are - but more. They want us to grovel for their company.

    Classic rentier class.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Twinkie says:
    @CCZ
    So henceforth, I (as an "It's OK To Be White") can invert and say:

    "… As against our gauzy national hopes, I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with BLACK people is possible. When they ask, I will teach my sons that their beautiful hue is a fault line. Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside. I first have to keep my boys safe, and so I will teach them before the world shows them this particular brand of rending, violent, often fatal betrayal."

    You should invert the sex, too (i.e. “keep my boys safe” to “keep my girls safe”).

    Read More
    • Agree: CCZ
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Hail says: • Website

    even in Donald Trump’s America, I have not given up on being friends with all white people. My bi-ethnic wife, my most trusted friend, understands she is seen as a white woman, even though her brother and father are not. Among my dearest friends, the wedding party and children’s godparents variety, many are white. But these are the friends who have marched in protest, rushed to airports to protest the president’s travel ban, people who have shared the risks required by strength and decency.

    But these people are not “White” for him.

    Our culture generally, too, does not consider such people White, in practice. Note carefully how the term is used in the media. Steve Sailer has noted this often; it is not hard to see. White is most generally used as a term of shame or denigration.

    So it goes thus:
    - White is Bad
    - Those anti-Trump ‘White’ protest marchers are Good
    - If a man/woman is Good, it follows that he/she is Not White

    Essentially, for the Far Left, the Racial Left, the NYT Jewish Left, and ever-more pushing into the Center-Left and even the Center itself, “White” means “Trump voter.” This means around 120 million residents of the USA are “White” (i.e., the Trump white vote share in two-way race [.615] * Total gentile non-Hisp. White pop. [195m]). These people are said to be an oppressive menace to the world, essentially a gang of monstrous, awful people, deplorable, irredeemable (note that this is a fusion form of hatred: a class-race hatred against Trump Whites). In reality, “Whites,” here defined, have very little power and even with their guy (Trump) in the White House, continue to lose, although perhaps with better morale.

    Resisting the evil of the 120 million “Whites” are nearly 210 million heroic residents of the USA who are Not White (i.e., ‘White’ Hillary voters plus all heroic-victim Persons of Color [even those who voted for Trump]).

    This is unfortunate. The solution probably is some form of racialized politics for Whites, which has already begun.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  97. Luke Lea says:

    Surprised NYT ran that. The message: “It’s ok to be racist if you’re black.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    Surprised NYT ran that.
     
    Please tell me you're joking.

    The message: “It’s ok to be racist if you’re black.”
     
    No, that's not the message.

    Racist doesn't mean "someone who hates people of another race."

    Racist means white, and neither the NYT nor the black author are saying, "It's OK to be white if you're black", which is completely nonsensical.

    They're saying white people are evil, and deserve to be hated.

    That's not racism. That's diversity and social justice.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. EriK says:
    @AndrewR
    Reactionary thinkers seldom read the NYT. And this article will remain unknown to the low-IQ MAGAtard masses. But these things have ripple effects. The fact that the most prestigious newspaper in the entire US is publishing sewage like this does mean that the breaking point can't be far off. One extended economic depression and it's gloves off.

    low-IQ MAGAtard masses

    WTF?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    Andrew's entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.

    As Tiny Duck is parody of the hard Left, Andrew is a parody of a Richard Spencer big brain.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Ha-ha, on that picture of Ghanian immigrant Prof. Yankah and his apparently Jewish wife, do you know what’s that thing hanging framed in the background? It’s 1960s Chinese Cultural Revolution propaganda poster: http://digitalcommons.whitworth.edu/chinese_art_posters/66/

    Crushed by the Red Fist are the American imperialists and Soviet revisionists.

    Gives a glimpse into the psyche of the vibrant people we keep importing into this country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  100. @Cloudbuster
    I'm imagining Mrs. Yankah as in possession of a gargantuan case of self-hatred. Imagine how she must humiliate herself daily to prove herself worthy of being Mr. Yankah's wife despite her racist white skin.

    I’m imagining Mrs. Yankah as in possession of a gargantuan case of self-hatred.

    You lead a rich fantasy life then.

    She hates herself about as much as Steve hates golf.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. newrouter says:

    They have to go back to planet proggtard. pronto!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  102. J1234 says:

    A black guy wants his black kids to stay away from my white kids.

    Doesn’t sound like a problem to me. I wish there were more of him.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. Abe says: • Website
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    Your weird little hobbyhorse of proclaiming John Derbyshire ‘the white Ta Nehisi Coates’ got old over a year ago. But just to be clear since you pretend like it went over your head the first time in order to keep at it- the NATIONAL REVIEW essay that got Mr. Derbyshire ‘defenestrated’ was an exercise in Swiftian irony, and not something that was meant entirely literally. It was a direct response to the mean, self-deluded, self-pitying slander concocted by the most privileged blacks that death-by-cop was an immanent danger they fretted over when worrying about the fate of their sons instead of the much more common (by 1- if not 2 orders of magnitude) death-by-gang-banger-wannba over jewelry-smart phone-shoes-wallet-girl-random diss at the club. ‘Barack risks his life every time he goes to the gas station’ vapored our erstwhile First Lady. And beacause the Good White elite has gone on to embrace this slander and crush truth-talkers like Mr. Derbyshire, we now (by way of the passions of Saints Trayvon and Michael Brown) live in a country where death-by-homicide is 1/5 more likely nationally (and much much more likely if you have the misfortune of living in Baltimore, St. Louis, Chicago, etc.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Thomm says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton,

    er… it is pretty obvious why this is :

    i) Asian-Americans, particularly 2nd-gen or later (i.e. born in the US) are far less numerous.
    ii) Asians don’t have 250 years of history behind them as a simmering dispute.
    iii) The government cannot profit from politicizing Asian identity they way it can by politicizing black identity.
    iv) Asian success is being concealed by the left, but Asians are not politically savvy enough to realize it and fight back.
    v) Blacks still (wrongly) assume that Asians will be their allies in some anti-white alliance.
    vi) Asians are not united. Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and Korean Americans don’t socialize with each other.
    vii) East Asians quite readily adopt a Western first name and nominally convert to Christianity, so it is like they almost want to be invisible.

    South Asians are interesting, since they don’t change their names, don’t convert to Christianity, have much more experience with democracy and the English language, and are even more successful than East Asians in America. Many of the earlier ones were Republicans (Dinesh D’Souza, Bobby Jindal). But some later ones are Democrats.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie
    Some of your points are reasonable, but contain glaring errors of understanding, namely:

    East Asians quite readily adopt a Western first name and nominally convert to Christianity
     
    The adoption of Christianity among East Asians is overwhelmingly a Korean phenomenon. Japanese Christians are very few in number (if influential in Japan). Christianity is growing massively in China, to be sure, but it is still a tiny minority religion. In contrast, Christianity is the plurality religion in South Korea, and it exercises an outsized social, economic, and political influence there. Moreover, something like 70-80% of Koreans in the United States attend churches, making Korean-Americans even more Christian than their counterparts in South Korea. Finally, they are not "nominal" Christians. When East Asians (especially Koreans) become Christians, they tend to be quite fervent. South Korea sends out more Christian missionaries into the world than any other nation, except the United States.

    Many of the earlier ones were Republicans (Dinesh D’Souza, Bobby Jindal). But some later ones are Democrats.
     
    South Asians were never Republicans in large numbers at any time, despite the likes of D'Souza and Jindal. They tend to vote overwhelmingly for the Democrats, usually in the 90-10 range. According to the Manhattan Institute's long-running study on immigrant assimilation, Indians also display the lowest rate of assimilation among Asian immigrants.

    Much of the changes in the average political and social behaviors of "Asian immigrants" can be attributed to the fact that the fastest growing segment of Asian immigrants is the South Asian category (while East Asian migration outside of China is declining rapidly), and they are very different from earlier East Asian immigrants in several important respects.
    , @Reg Cæsar
    You left out the most obvious factor: (East) Asians who obsess about their own race would tend to stay home in Asia!
    , @Karl
    91 Thomm > South Asians [...] don’t convert to Christianity


    i'll mention your theory to all the Catholics (as in "Roman") in Goa.

    Tell your son serving in ComFifthFleet, to check out the Goan maids in the RC church in town.

    If your son is a 7 who could land a 7 white bride, he'll be able to land a 8-9 Goan Catholic girl.

    As pleasant as a provinciana filipina, but with a 5-10 IQ point advantage.


    Not many of those Goan women would even dream of breeding with a dindu, which is more than we can say about (e.g.) Nordic women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Thomm says:
    @AndrewR
    Plenty of orientals are race obsessed.

    See: angryasianman.com

    See: Love Life of an Asian Guy

    Most people in general don't think too much about race. But there's that 10% or so in each group to whom race seems like the most salient thing about this world.

    But there’s that 10% or so in each group to whom race seems like the most salient thing about this world.

    This is true of about 70% of blacks, but about 10-20% of whites (these whites become the WN wiggers that we see here).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yan Shen
    Well I don't know if I would necessarily agree with your comments about WNs having blue hair or the IQ of blacks or whatever else it is that you often like to point out, but I will uh agree that the vast majority of blacks are obsessed with race, a minority of whites are thoroughly obsessed with race, and there are some pretty strange and creepy fellows in the WN blogosphere who seem to be blithely unaware of their own creepiness.
    , @Pericles
    In other words, when the day comes, everyone will be happier if you stay on the other side of the fence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    It’s so pathetic when immigrant 90th-percentile African blacks try to horn in on American blacks’ misery resources. This Ewok guy is a phony who steers clear of certain neighborhoods and whose ancestors sold slaves to Whitey for the hell of it

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  107. @james wilson
    So, it's ok again to think that we are not all the same under the skin?

    Nope. We’re all the same under the skin, except when blacks or Asians or whoever tend to outperform whites, then we’re not the same under skin.

    See how simple it is. Now move along and, remember, vote GOP because while we also hate you, we don’t hate you as much as the Dems. Also, under our rule, it’ll take at least 20 or so years more for things to collapse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. @nigel
    I continue to have hope that Steve's citizenism is a viable option. I have to admit, articles like this in a mainstream publication make me doubt.

    Citizenism is more Boomer inability to face the hard things that have to be done.

    The future is tribalism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    The future is tribalism.
     
    I would argue that the present is tribalism. It's merely a matter of some deluded people that think it doesn't apply to them. Those people are the ones, normally, who have the most to lose from this delusion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    “As against our gauzy national hopes, I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with white people is possible. When they ask, I will teach my sons that their beautiful hue is a fault line. Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside. I first have to keep my boys safe, and so I will teach them before the world shows them this particular brand of rending, violent, often fatal betrayal.”

    So, lets see, she gives “The Talk”, and, despite the fact that all the evidence shows her kids are statistically more likely to be violent towards or a burden upon whites, she gets her writing posted to the Grey Lady, as an achievement.

    Meanwhile, Derb writes a piece, cautioning his own kids based upon a factual, real-world danger from blacks, and gets purged from public thought.

    You know what, lady, if you don’t want your kids to be friends with whites, I encourage you and them to seek your Nirvana- move to the blackest area within commuting distance of your job, encourage your kids to only hang out with other black kids there and in school, and refuse any race-based assistance since it is ultimately from the evil white man.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  110. Art Deco says:
    @CCZ
    He is a quite prolific Huff-Po, PBS, New Yorker, NY Times, You Tube, etc., etc. commentator.

    A short sample:

    July 15, 2013 New York Times - The Trayvon Martin verdict is frustrating, fracturing, angering and predictable. More than anything, for many of us, it is exhausting. Exhausting because nothing could bring back our lost child, exhausting because the verdict, which should have felt shocking, arrived with the inevitability that black Americans know too well when criminal law announces that they are worth less than other Americans. ....

    I can imagine a jurisprudence that at least begins to use racial disparities as a tool to question the constitutionality of criminal punishment

     

    https://twitter.com/ekownyankah

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/ekow-n-yankah/fergusons-easy-answers_b_5737352.html?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&ir=Black+Voices

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gsxrCVOXFQ

    I had quite voluminous discussions at the time with abrasive white progs. There were two features of their thinking on the case (not that they were quite self-conscious about them):

    1. Zimmerman himself had no palpable reality in their mind. He was a character in a narrative whose acts and motives could be whatever the narrator (obnoxious white progs) elected to impute to him.

    2. Implicit in the stances they did take was the notion that black youth properly had a franchise to beat up people who irritated them, and if you were a peasant who got beaten up, that’s your fault.

    Read More
    • Agree: Alec Leamas
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. @Cloudbuster
    Actually, Derbyshire's version wasn't as extreme. He extolled the value of having a few Intelligent Well-Socialized Blacks (IWSBs) as friends, to help insulate one against charges of racism.

    That was quite a few years ago, though. I can't be bothered with the effort of that because I no longer care about being called racist, and I suspect Derbyshire doesn't care anymore, either.

    Derbyshire has non-white children (Chinese). How can he tell these non-white children not to be friends or date other non-whites (i.e., blacks)?

    Yankah’s wife is Jewish and according to Jewish law the offspring are Jewish.

    Derbyshire is a semitophile. He should have no problem with Jews like these.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. @Cagey Beast
    A huge shakeup is coming, whether people want it or not, and the NYT reading types are going to eventually look upon the recent Alt Right and /pol/ pranks with nostalgia.

    There’s a line of thought going around in some circles that the white SJWs are going to go absolutely insane with rage towards their colored allies when the SJWs realise how they’re never going to be forgiven for being white.

    The AR/Hotep “alliance” is moving from entertaining meme fodder to a real thing for that reason.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. @EriK

    low-IQ MAGAtard masses
     
    WTF?

    Andrew’s entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.

    As Tiny Duck is parody of the hard Left, Andrew is a parody of a Richard Spencer big brain.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    going full Pinochet
     
    Free helicopter rides for SJWs and leftist activists!

    As Tiny Duck is parody of the hard Left, Andrew is a parody of a Richard Spencer big brain.
     
    That's funny.
    , @Anonymous

    Andrew’s entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.
     
    The left is infuriating but it still doesn't deserve the Pinochet treatment.

    If the U.S. were a Latin American country, by now there would have been several assassination/coup attempts against Trump, against a backdrop of continual nationwide low-level violence against government supporters and officials. The U.S. isn't there yet.
    , @AndrewR
    Pinochet was far too sadistic for me to really admire him or want anyone to fully emulate him, but it's hard not to be black-pilled by Trump and his low-info True Believing disciples. Trump doesn't have much in the way of a coherent worldview or governing style, which allows him to be easily misled by tribesmen like Kushner. He is also unbelievably thin-skinned, which is obviously a dangerous trait for a leader.

    DJT must be viewed as merely a stepping-stone. It was refreshing to hear him break some political taboos during his campaign but that's about all he's been good for.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. Harold says:
    @e
    Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside.

    Finally, someone admits publicly we are NOT "the same on the inside." Yes, there are trivial and not-so-trivial biological differences between the races.

    Now, Professor, you concur, but are you willing to talk about those biological differences? We are.

    We start the conversation by making people understand the basics of natural selection.

    Let us begin.

    He isn’t admitting that. He’s just saying that he doesn’t care, given the reality of white ‘dominance’ and ‘racism’ and his priority to keep his sons safe.

    That’s how I read it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @e
    Ever watch "Big Bang Theory"? Sheldon? Unable to recognize sarcasm?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Yawn! He doesn’t want to be friends with us. We can handle it. Of course, it’s probably nonsense. He and his family will be race hustling parasites until the Nth generation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  116. @Anonymous
    This is an interesting Blind Item reveal from Crazy Days and Night in lieu of the recent Seagal allegations:

    http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/blind-items-revealed-2-anniversary-month_9.html

    The other sources for the reporter also confirmed that the dictator was proud that he had got the woman from one of his favorite actors and that he was sorry she had died because the actor would ask him about her when they saw each other. The dictator is now dead. The protection the actor is getting comes from another leader who also enjoys the company of the actor and they share the same taste in women and violence.

    Steven Seagal/Kelly LeBrock/Muammar Gaddafi/Vladimir Putin
     

    From a quick Internet search, I don’t see any evidence that Seagal and Gaddafi were associates. If they weren’t, that entire “Blind” is bullshit.

    In looking, however, I found this, of interest to Derbyshire:

    Jennifer Lopez and Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/nicki-minaj-and-more-stars-who-hang-with-dictators

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. Art Deco says:
    @Inquiring Mind
    Has a person read John Derbyshire's "The Talk"? The way it is being described on this thread has me wonder if there is a different version of it than the one I am reading https://thecampofthesaints.org/john-derbyshires-the-talk-nonblack-version/.

    One cannot think of a single Asian American equivalent to John Derbyshire? How about, say, start with John Derbyshire, who is fully Asian American in the sense that President Obama is black?

    John Derbyshire’s wife is Chinese, not his father.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Inquiring Mind
    . . . in the sense that President Obama is black (i.e. West African ancestors forcibly brought to America by way of the Middle Passage).

    Mr. Obama is indeed black by way of his wife and two children, the same way Mr. Derbyshire is Asian-American. Mr. Obama is certainly a Person of Color, but aside from his marriage, he is not black, and yes, that was certainly a factor in his slow start to a political career on Chicago's South Side.

    Sheesh! A person can't making a snarky remark around here without having to explain themselves?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Lagertha says:

    I was absolutely horrified by this article. I mean, he is basically saying: segregation is the only path for his sons to feel “safe” around white kids. It was the most depressing thing I have read from a person who has no interest to even care. So…divide continues….anger & nihilism, futility continue, yey.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JimB
    Last I checked Ghana was 99.9% Black. Maybe Ewok should move back with his family.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. Bill P says:
    @larry lurker
    I don't really speak Chinese but I was able to figure out enough of the characters using Google Translate's drawing input feature to find the full text:

    Left text: 中国人民不可辱 = The Chinese people cannot be humiliated/insulted/abused

    Right text: 世界人民不可欺 = The people of the world cannot be bullied/cheated/taken advantage of

    The fist: 第三世界 = The Third World

    Googling the complete text, I found two things. The first was a picture of an African woman at a market looking at the same poster. Caption (auto-translated): "It seems that such 'red' posters are no stranger to people in third world countries."

    The second was a full view of the poster on Instagram where we can finally see what the Third World fist is landing on: two aggressively white men in suits, both of whom appear to be bleeding out of their heads. (Or maybe that's just supposed to represent the impact of their heads hitting the ground...)

    The American left is indeed Maoist. That’s a very racially aggressive poster. Why not turn that racial aggression on its main proponents: the white billionaires who run this country, and those in California in particular?

    We deplorables are a hard, meagre target. Well-armed, impecunious and irredeemable (according to the left). We also might not care if POC seize some beachside estates in Malibu and Marin County.

    If we were really deplorable, what we’d do is agitate the Maoists into a frenzy in their breeding grounds, and turn them loose on their wealthy, liberal neighbors.

    Morally, that sounds pretty bad, but one of these days some of our people are going to start asking “why not?” If the elites really hate us so much, then who are our real enemies? The aimless brown masses or their duplicitous would-be masters who want to use them to crush us? I think we’re starting to figure out the answer to that.

    Read More
    • Agree: fish, Alden
    • Replies: @BenKenobi
    This guy gets it.

    Fourth generation memetic warfare. The diverse hordes are weaponized, but they are not under any formal command. The sword can cut both ways.

    What's to stop an interested party raising PoC flash mobs via social media?

    "YOU HAVE RESEARCHED NEGRO STORM."
    , @Lagertha

    We also might not care if POC seize some beachside estates in Malibu and Marin County.
     
    I have predicted this for some time. Deplorables can't afford to move, so, they will stay in their states/counties for time immemorial....everywhere, where the wealthy and highly educated do not want to live even in their wildest dreams. And, as the major coastal cities (including Chicago) will become ever more built up with million dollar+ housing, poor people will be pushed to the fringes of the major cities...resentment over gentrification builds, and then sh&t explodes. There will be riots and anarchy...similar to "Winter is Coming."

    I predict that wealthy people/communities are already vulnerable since the Uzbekistani creep decided to deliberately mow down a bike path in beautiful, exclusive, Battery City. And, communities that are exclusive, like Battery Park will become too tempting for anarchists and nihilists. Just stealing a household's computers, robots, tech toys will be easy pickings since so many people have multiple homes, and, leave homes empty. And, there are ways now, sadly, where hackers can disable alarm systems. In our area, there is an increase of home invasions, break-ins...stealing cars!? - certain ordinary models wind up in Mexico, Columbia, etc. It's very weird.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Alden says:

    Look at that couple. Their kids must be the ugliest in town.

    I thought that jew commie woman black man fad ended around 1980 after the jew commie liberal women discovered lesbianism and dogs. I wonder if her grandma was one of the Prison Law Project gals who made the lives of black prisoners happier for a few minutes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  121. @larry lurker
    I don't really speak Chinese but I was able to figure out enough of the characters using Google Translate's drawing input feature to find the full text:

    Left text: 中国人民不可辱 = The Chinese people cannot be humiliated/insulted/abused

    Right text: 世界人民不可欺 = The people of the world cannot be bullied/cheated/taken advantage of

    The fist: 第三世界 = The Third World

    Googling the complete text, I found two things. The first was a picture of an African woman at a market looking at the same poster. Caption (auto-translated): "It seems that such 'red' posters are no stranger to people in third world countries."

    The second was a full view of the poster on Instagram where we can finally see what the Third World fist is landing on: two aggressively white men in suits, both of whom appear to be bleeding out of their heads. (Or maybe that's just supposed to represent the impact of their heads hitting the ground...)

    Thanks!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. Art Deco says:
    @Forbes
    Derb was a contributor, not an employee, as such he was very publicly told his contributions were no longer needed. National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards. Cuck is the word that comes to mind. Have not read the mag or it's website since the NeverTrump issue in '15.

    National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards.

    Not really. Their capable contributors generally leave in accordance with ordinary attrition and are replaced, if at all, with the sort of clot he’s been able to recruit the last 15 years. The four the magazine has made a public point of cutting were Joseph Sobran, John O’Sullivan, Ann Coulter, and Derbyshire. Coulter is a provacateur and said something intemperate in the heat of the moment. I’m sure Sobran fancied himself honest, but ‘pig-headed crank’ captures his quality rather more accurately.

    Read More
    • Replies: @newrouter
    ". Their capable contributors generally leave in accordance with ordinary attrition and are replaced, if at all"

    with hacks doing the official NR cuck line. lol
    , @Nico

    I’m sure Sobran fancied himself honest, but ‘pig-headed crank’ captures his quality rather more accurately.
     
    I liked Joe Sobran, cranky or not. I can see how some humorless c__ts might consider him "pig-headed" but he was certainly more honest and more decent than WFB was (granted, that's setting the bar incredibly low: even so, Sobran was undoubtedly a good man).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. eah says:

    I’m sure they live in a neighborhood where there’s little chance their kids will mix with white kids — or will soon be moving there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  124. Yan Shen says:
    @ic1000
    Yan Shen, you are perhaps misinformed. You approvingly quote these remarks about John Derbyshire's "The Talk: Nonblack Version".

    Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed [your son] to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    ...Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.
     
    Derbyshire's essay was harsh, and certain to give offense to the amour propre of its subjects. But by my reading, at no point does he wish ill on black people or damn them, as Ta-Nehesi Coates does to his white fellow citizens.

    I don’t think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans. He mostly blames them for the woes afflicting black America and repeatedly urges white Americans to be more open about their supposed privilege and racism.

    Now I agree that all of this seems rather misguided. However, TNC’s crime isn’t so much that he’s wrong, but that he obsesses over race constantly in an unproductive fashion. The fact that society fawns over him for doing so, as correctly observed in the quote above, really sticks in some people’s craw. It’s mind boggling how anyone could think that anything TNC has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight.

    John Derbyshire, while he may be narrowly speaking correct on the facts, turns off some people not because he’s wrong or politically incorrect, but because some of us don’t see the productive value in basically shouting endlessly from the top of your lungs, over and over again, to anyone within 100 miles willing to listen that on average blacks are less intelligent and more prone to violence compared to members of other ethnic groups. This doesn’t seem like a particularly constructive way for blacks and whites to move forward, hand in hand, as Mr. Derbyshire often likes to say. Rather it seems like a great way to piss people off.

    A man of Mr. Derbyshire’s intellect should be able to more smartly and constructively get his points across, in a way more likely to lead to tangible action.

    As I like to say, there are three things certain in this world, death, taxes, and Mr. Derbyshire warning us week after week after week after week about the Black Menace!

    Read More
    • Replies: @CCZ
    "I don’t think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans."

    I respectfully disagree.

    From Coates interview with Ezra Klein from VOX:

    "Every nickel of wealth the average black family has, the average white family has a dollar. What is the world in which that wealth gap is closed? What happens? What makes that possible? What does that look like? What is the process?"

    When he tries to describe the events that would erase America's wealth gap, that would see the end of white supremacy, his thoughts flicker to the French Revolution, to the executions and the terror.

    "It's very easy for me to see myself being contemporary with processes that might make for an equal world, more equality, and maybe the complete abolition of race as a construct, and being horrified by the process, maybe even attacking the process. I think these things don't tend to happen peacefully."

    For Coates, even hope can be covered in blood.
     
    , @Nico

    A man of Mr. Derbyshire’s intellect should be able to more smartly and constructively get his points across, in a way more likely to lead to tangible action.
     
    Do you have a suggestion? For example, an edit or a rewrite which is not only "narrowly speaking correct on the facts" but also gets the point across "more smartly and constructively" and "in a way more likely to lead to tangible action"?

    Don't feel bad if the answer is "no." Derbyshire's essay elicited a hostile response, because it related three truths that no one wants to deal with no matter how they are expressed, namely

    1. American blacks count a disproportionate share of violent thugs among themselves, enough that it can be life-saving for a non-black to consider a congregation of a substantial number of them a statistical threat;
    2. There is a substantial fraction of influential people who argue and who act as though the aggregate danger should be discounted *and* that the actions of individuals (in criminality, scholarship, professional life and elsewhere) should not be held to cold hard "colorblind" standards because of "disparate impact"; and
    3. The need to nevertheless maintain a delicate social balance in light of the juxtaposition of 1 and 2 imposes substantial costs, material and human, on the productive sectors of society, with little overall salutary return having been demonstrated.

    There is no P.C. way to put this and there is no way it can NOT anger the SJW and cuck crowd, because the Eleanor Roosevelt principle of "always champion the underdog" has morphed into a sacrosanct victim-worship that parodies the Eucharistic sacrifice in Christianity. And as the liberals themselves have shown in studies, you cannot undo a belief so religiously held by condescendingly pointing out contradictory facts and logical fallacies in ritual Nice White Lady schoolteacher fashion. A negative blowback was inevitable.
    , @ic1000
    > I don’t think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans.

    See CCZ's quote of Coates' interview with Ezra Klein at #127. Also see the concluding pages of "Between The World And Me," excerpted here. Coates takes on the mantle of an Old Testament prophet to curse and damn white Americans.

    Coates wouldn't go out of his way to inflict violence on me (or rape my daughter) as redress for the racial injustices of the past. Unlike some Black Panther comrades of his father, according to their own accounts. Is that because he lives by a higher moral code, or is it due to an intellectual's squeamishness and cost/benefit analysis? Although I've read his books and essays, I can't say.
    , @Chrisnonymous
    You talk a good game on high Asian M, but you've never backed up your claims about Derbyshire quantitatively.

    Here's a claim for you:
    "After removing commentary that focuses on the left's race-hustling (i.e., all commentary that wouldn't exist if not for the left's obsession with race), Derbyshire's paragraphs that focus on blacks constitute less than 10% of his output by word count."

    I'll even grant you to start measuring after his defenestration by NR (thus ignoring the vast quantity of his archived writing which you have admitted to not reading).

    If you can't falsify my claim and if you are an honest person, you'll stop your mistaken and, frankly, quite stupid comparison of Derb and TNC.

    Are you up to the challenge? Think of it as a quest, like Legend of Dilda or whatever you play.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. eah says:
    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    Per whitepages.com, Mr Ekow N Yankah (how many of them could there be?) lives at 29 Perry St in NYC -- this is Greenwich Village -- per the demographic pie chart below, he's going to have a few problems keeping his kids away from white kids.

    http://unpackingthebookstore.susqu.edu/wp-content/uploads/Greenwich-Village-diversity.png
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. newrouter says:
    @Art Deco
    National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards.

    Not really. Their capable contributors generally leave in accordance with ordinary attrition and are replaced, if at all, with the sort of clot he's been able to recruit the last 15 years. The four the magazine has made a public point of cutting were Joseph Sobran, John O'Sullivan, Ann Coulter, and Derbyshire. Coulter is a provacateur and said something intemperate in the heat of the moment. I'm sure Sobran fancied himself honest, but 'pig-headed crank' captures his quality rather more accurately.

    “. Their capable contributors generally leave in accordance with ordinary attrition and are replaced, if at all”

    with hacks doing the official NR cuck line. lol

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. Yan Shen says:

    Here’s the deeper point to consider in all of this. White Americans basically fucked themselves and everyone else in this country over with their prior bad behavior. Even if you aren’t someone who’s particular worked up over the morality of slavery or Jim Crow or outright racism towards blacks that characterized much of say the pre 1960s history of America, from a practical perspective this prior history of bad behavior has basically forced all of us who came later in this country to be at the whim of black worship and anti-racism for basically the rest of eternity. In the same respect, the extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now we’ll all have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till The End of Time.

    Which quite frankly really, really sucks. Who wants to hear society fawn over and over again about the supposed genius of Ta Nehisi Coates?

    Even worse, through the psychological phenomenon of projection and despite the fact that Asians have no real history of antagonism towards blacks in this country and in fact are often the victims of anti-black violence and prejudice, Asian Americans are often slandered as being supposedly racist towards blacks, when in fact much of the negative perception that Asians may harbor simply reflects what I’ve described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yan Shen
    Sorry meant to say that Asians in this country are often the victims of anti-Asian violence and prejudice at the hands of blacks. While blacks and whites in this country obsess tirelessly over themselves and each other, one of the great human rights tragedies, as I've pointed out numerous times, is the silent victimization that Asian Americans in this country face, oftentimes at the hands of blacks, Hispanics, and whites alike!
    , @Anonymous
    If your ancestors didn't fight in the Civil War you'll never really 'get' race relations in America.

    That doesn't just rule out Asians, Indians, etc., but also a lot of whites, including bona fide WASPs like Derbyshire.
    , @silviosilver

    Even worse, through the psychological phenomenon of projection and despite the fact that Asians have no real history of antagonism towards blacks in this country and in fact are often the victims of anti-black violence and prejudice, Asian Americans are often slandered as being supposedly racist towards blacks, when in fact much of the negative perception that Asians may harbor simply reflects what I’ve described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality…
     
    Are you seriously suggesting whites deserve the treatment they've suffered at the hands of blacks? Is that your position?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. “My bi-ethnic wife, my most trusted friend, understands she is seen as a white woman, even though her brother and father are not.”

    Her father and brother are not see as white women? How awful for them if that’s how they identify.

    Read More
    • LOL: eah
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  129. Yan Shen says:

    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would’ve been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn’t have to hear about how racism and privilege are what’s holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he’s the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can’t have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren’t for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn’t mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that’s become par for the course for polite society…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein

    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion,
     
    That is, practically word for word, the same line that the northern Abolitionists used 170 years ago, that lecturesome Western European liberals used in the middle 20th century, and that anybody uses who lacks direct experience with a large population of feral Blacks. How quaint that your should be bringing it up again.

    This is a sentimental notion, born of naivete, that leads to catastrophe each and every time it breaks out. It must have escaped your notice that Whites have spent unfathomable amounts of money and have more or less dismantled their entire social infrastructure in order to accommodate Blacks, to "treat them like fellow citizens," and yet here we are today anyway.

    And now it is the Blacks themselves demanding re-segregation, but Whites are still supposed to be bend over backwards to include them where they themselves no longer want to be included. How far can such nonsense be pushed? This is a bad marriage that should have broken up decades ago. Maybe it's time for White liberals to practice what they preach and actually listen to the demands of Black voices.

    It's over. And I'm keeping the jewelry.
    , @Discard
    If you had any real experience with the average Black, you'd know very well why we had segregation.
    , @Bill P
    You're saying that if only whites had been nice to blacks after the Civil War, then this problem of blacks beating up Asians in California would not exist...

    So, according to your rationale, contemporary California Asians, such as you, are also victims of Jim Crow.

    Do you actually believe this, or is it, as I suspect, simply a convenient (and transparent) ploy to provide moral cover for a complaint about black criminality?
    , @Pericles

    And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

     

    See, there's the problem. Those Asians should start treating blacks as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion.
    , @ThreeCranes
    Excuse me, honorable Yan Shen. Here is a book about Negroes in their native state. This was the raw material whites had to work with. We are trying to build St. Paul's Cathedral out of mud. Their innate nature has not evolved. Please read and let the scales fall from your eyes.

    https://archive.org/stream/negroesinnegrola00help/negroesinnegrola00help_djvu.txt

    or if you want a hard copy, try this,

    https://www.amazon.com/Negroes-Negroland-America-Generally-Involuntary/dp/1330220005/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1510575794&sr=1-1&keywords=the+negro+in+negroland&dpID=51NImHhmZ%252BL&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch
    , @anon
    But yeah, we can’t have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans.

    It's a pity that your family chose to come here then, isn't it?
    , @Chrisnonymous

    we can’t have any of that common sense good stuff because... way back in the day
     
    No. People in the present and very recent past are responsible for the present. We can't have that common sense good stuff because of today's left, not because of yesterday's problems. There is nothing like path dependence controlling the coverage of race in the media. It's the choices made every day by editors, academics, politicians, etc. They have the blame.

    My thesis is that if it weren’t for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn’t mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that’s become par for the course for polite society…
     
    This is really meaningless. If you didn't spend so much time playing video games, you might be better able to distinguish between fantastical speculation and meaningful political commentary. The black problem goes so far back and is so tangled up with the history of the Americas that it's impossible to imagine a world of "good behavior" that is anything like the modern world.

    Although you write long posts, most of your criticism and suggestions seem to come down to saying, "Stop being mean!" Yeah, okay.
    , @Ragno
    Dear Yan Shen:

    Let the inimitable HBD researcher, M.G. Miles, explain how things work. I hope you're paying attention.


    On Planet Earth, Afro crime is high. Period. It is high in their homeland, Africa. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were colonizers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were not colonizers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were slavers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were not slavers. It is high nearly everywhere they are found on this third rock from the sun. Idang Alibi, a Nigerian journalist, states it plainly:

    Anywhere in the world today where you have a concentration of black people among other races, the poorest, the least educated, the least achieving, and the most violent group among those races will be the blacks. When indices of underdevelopment are given, black people and countries are sure to occupy the bottom of the ladder.

    God himself must be frustrated with his black children. They must be an embarrassment to him. He has given us everything he has given to other of his children; why are his black children not manifesting their own gift?
     

    Afro crime is very high relative to other groups. This is why we profile.
     
    Find the original article here: http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.fr/2013/08/why-we-profile.html
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. Yan Shen says:
    @Yan Shen
    Here's the deeper point to consider in all of this. White Americans basically fucked themselves and everyone else in this country over with their prior bad behavior. Even if you aren't someone who's particular worked up over the morality of slavery or Jim Crow or outright racism towards blacks that characterized much of say the pre 1960s history of America, from a practical perspective this prior history of bad behavior has basically forced all of us who came later in this country to be at the whim of black worship and anti-racism for basically the rest of eternity. In the same respect, the extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now we'll all have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till The End of Time.

    Which quite frankly really, really sucks. Who wants to hear society fawn over and over again about the supposed genius of Ta Nehisi Coates?

    Even worse, through the psychological phenomenon of projection and despite the fact that Asians have no real history of antagonism towards blacks in this country and in fact are often the victims of anti-black violence and prejudice, Asian Americans are often slandered as being supposedly racist towards blacks, when in fact much of the negative perception that Asians may harbor simply reflects what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality...

    Sorry meant to say that Asians in this country are often the victims of anti-Asian violence and prejudice at the hands of blacks. While blacks and whites in this country obsess tirelessly over themselves and each other, one of the great human rights tragedies, as I’ve pointed out numerous times, is the silent victimization that Asian Americans in this country face, oftentimes at the hands of blacks, Hispanics, and whites alike!

    Read More
    • Replies: @RudyM
    Yan Shen, In recent decades, victimization (particularly violent victimization) of Asians has primarily come from blacks. Get real. I think many whites recognize that black violence extends to violence against Asians. Colin Flaherty certainly talks about it a lot.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31niuEQfr7k

    , @Twinkie

    the silent victimization that Asian Americans in this country face, oftentimes at the hands of blacks, Hispanics, and whites alike!
     
    You are absolutely, positively WRONG about this statement.

    Asians face little violence from whites, and only somewhat more from Hispanics. The overwhelming amount of violence and destruction visited upon Asians in the United States come from blacks, period.

    Even a casual perusal of the crime statistics should make this fact obvious.
    , @Discard
    The bar for great human rights tragedies must be pretty low.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. JimB says:
    @Philalethes
    I wonder at the inclusion of this Chinese Communist propaganda poster in this obviously posed photo (in which I note neither subject is actually looking a the camera – click on the photo for a larger version).

    My Chinese skill is rudimentary, but I believe the line on the left says "The Chinese People cannot…." Unfortunately the last character is too blurred for me to read, even enlarged. And the three characters visible on the right say "The World's People…." The characters in white on the fist's cuff say "Third World". Apparently the Third World is going to crush something – White People, perhaps? Well, what else to do with people you can't be friends with?

    The poster says “Chinese people can’t be insulted. Third World.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. RudyM says:
    @Yan Shen
    Sorry meant to say that Asians in this country are often the victims of anti-Asian violence and prejudice at the hands of blacks. While blacks and whites in this country obsess tirelessly over themselves and each other, one of the great human rights tragedies, as I've pointed out numerous times, is the silent victimization that Asian Americans in this country face, oftentimes at the hands of blacks, Hispanics, and whites alike!

    Yan Shen, In recent decades, victimization (particularly violent victimization) of Asians has primarily come from blacks. Get real. I think many whites recognize that black violence extends to violence against Asians. Colin Flaherty certainly talks about it a lot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RudyM
    (I wish he would blab less.)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8eOGZnJRVg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. JimB says:
    @Lagertha
    I was absolutely horrified by this article. I mean, he is basically saying: segregation is the only path for his sons to feel "safe" around white kids. It was the most depressing thing I have read from a person who has no interest to even care. So...divide continues....anger & nihilism, futility continue, yey.

    Last I checked Ghana was 99.9% Black. Maybe Ewok should move back with his family.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. eD says:
    @Krastos the Gluemaker
    The White Death doesn't really exist the way Sailer thinks it does, is one reason why. Deaton and Case's work of course was severely flawed from the start. It's not like they collected any data properly themselves and they made major mistakes in analyzing it. Here are some summaries.

    All of the discrepancies and then some that people are claiming exist in the 2000s era are actually, in hard numbers, accounted for by the deaths of military veterans, disproportionately white US adults, some in direct action in the War in Iraq and "War on Terror" but plenty in related circumstances that always result from wartime like suicide. Remember that adult white male death rates didn't meaningfully increase, even with this decade-plus effect. Of course both the media and political establishment don't like emphasizing this, and I guess a few partisan sources never put two and two together on reporting when they do talk about this, but don't realize the huge effects on death rates. (Remember that so few young people, like under age 60, die in the first place, that any shocks such as military deaths can cause huge percentage point effects. As one example, that came up long ago in looking at numbers like these, the 9/11 attacks just about doubled the homicide rate, which is how it's weirdly counted, for groups adult white males for a year-remember working age white adults were the modal victims of 9/11)

    Only somewhere in the tens millions of the leftwing, anti-war voters and Bernie supporters and so on could have told you this for fifteen years.

    While it is a little curious to suppose there is otherwise some novel discrepancy with white female adult death rates, there are a host of other factors including professional practice on the medicine end and data collection unaccounted for. Also, there are extremely subtle and complicated effects in both health and demography that could lead to counterintuitive results such as a decrease in childhood death rate that shows back up at older ages eventually, ceteris paribus. If someone with severe birth defects, for instance including Down Syndrome used to die at age 5, and now dies at age 40 in present-day society, that skews statistics.

    Lastly but at least second-most importantly, it's quite possible that bias in the US Census (which the organization freely admits often exist, and in fact the alt-right constantly assumes in other circumstances) has thrown off the objectively small percentage changes in death rates and whatnot that this is all about. The data sources are completely different, not necessarily reliable, and any error there would overwhelm all other effects. Instead of the number of deaths being meaningfully different, it could be the estimates of population that went wrong (and again, the Census often claims errors of 3-5% in measuring white vis-a-vis non-Hispanic white population)

    So, the much vaunted drug epidemic really mostly took off after 2010 and it's still not clear there that changes in data collection and attention don't make up a lot of the statistical hubbub compared to something like 50 years ago. We can't trust data from back then; doctors, families, etc would and did to an unknown extent coverup when people died of drugs or suicide or something and it would be attributed to other causes. It's possible the Internet age and changes in culture and technology are what changed the final data reporting, with nothing being qualitatively different from the past.

    Other than the few hundred people, in different age range groups than everyone made a fuss abou, in a few geographically concentrated areas a year the opiod epidemic has little large scale impact on deaths per se and isn't necessarily meaningfully different from other drug epidemics in the past. Nor is it even different from other pathologies common in the US from car accidents to homicide when compared on an international scale.

    Incidentally, though this has been said before, all the propaganda about the white "lower class" and their drug addictions and all in the media is a nonsensical effort to distract from the fact that the white "middle class" also has strongly shifted to the Republican party in the last few years. Even Sailer himself didn't know the numbers or made the wrong estimate; the white middle class went more R in 2012, 2014, and 2016 than MSM propagandists are trying to claim and erase.

    This is actually an interesting comment, but then you get articles like this:

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/12/08/504667607/life-expectancy-in-u-s-drops-for-first-time-in-decades-report-finds

    This is from NPR, which is not exactly known for samizadat.

    Granted, when I googled “life expectancy in the US”, I immediately got the answer that it is 78.8 years, which I dont’t think it has ever been, and has been rising, and has never declined, though I remember several articles about the decline in life expectancy last year and the year before, but who knows? I think something has been going on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Krastos the Gluemaker
    Yeah, part of this is conflated terms because life expectancy is affected by a ton of things as it's overall health; there's obesity and all that. For decades it's been pointed out that obesity and other health issues could come back to bite Americans, in terms of overall life expectancy or whatever, that's not new in the literature. Then you have the "White Death" which is a poorly defined concept with the term mostly only heard around the alt-right anyway, and the opioid epidemic which is much more narrow, and also, applies to different groups besides the "White Death." (Remember part of this whole White Death mania started by a clear error in counting and adjusting for the ages of people wrong, and it's not like white people are the only ones doing drugs or anything)

    Honestly the takes have always been in a terrible direction on this topic, veering into lunacy. An even more cynical but plausible view would be that the current hysteria is somehow a ploy by, say, Big Tobacco (far more Americans, including whites still die from tobacco-related maladies than the current wave of illegal drugs) to distract from their own bad publicity.

    What's really going in the media again is cognitive dissonance where neoliberal, establish Dems just can't believe they have lost the support they lost; people can't believe their middle class neighborhoods voted Republican or something. So they have to invent innumerate crazy canards; admittedly many alt-right bloggers aren't so innumerate but people make wildly wrong estimates all the time. (POTUS does not help, but he's a moron, not a 4D chessmaster). The situation is not that there are 20 million "coal miners" in the US and a million die from unnatural causes each year, and neoliberals are morally justified in trashtalking them, but laypeople don't grok large numbers, can hardly tell between a million and a thousand and so on.

    As for the drug epidemic talk itself, I think this will really confirm in the end qualitative things many experts already knew. By analogy, drug epidemics can be like forest fires, they eventually burn out in one generation until a new generation comes along, and that would often be with a new drug. Some of the far out media reports are likely caused again by innumeracy, because some events would be treated by the authorities more as mass murder or terrorism if the narratives were true, but the thousands of people across a country as big as ours being involved in drugs is just statistics. Not clear there is anything different in the cold, statistical perspective (obviously being sympathetic to the thousands of people involved is a qualm) than prior epidemics in the US involving cocaine, alcohol etc
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Yan Shen says:
    @Thomm

    But there’s that 10% or so in each group to whom race seems like the most salient thing about this world.
     
    This is true of about 70% of blacks, but about 10-20% of whites (these whites become the WN wiggers that we see here).

    Well I don’t know if I would necessarily agree with your comments about WNs having blue hair or the IQ of blacks or whatever else it is that you often like to point out, but I will uh agree that the vast majority of blacks are obsessed with race, a minority of whites are thoroughly obsessed with race, and there are some pretty strange and creepy fellows in the WN blogosphere who seem to be blithely unaware of their own creepiness.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Well I don’t know if I would necessarily agree with your comments about WNs having blue hair
     
    I never, ever said that WNs have blue hair.

    I said that bottom-tier white women become 'feminists' and then dye their hair blue.

    The male equivalents in this bottom tier become WNs, and are similarly damaged and low-status.

    The rest of your comment is correct.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Better white than yellow.

    As a kid, I always thought albinos were strikingly pretty, and wanted to marry one. But while we white folks are more accepting of the condition in our brethren than are others, our odds are not good, as the incidence of albinism is fourteen times as high in Tanzania than in Europe and its diaspora:

    http://www.underthesamesun.com/sites/default/files/Frequency%20of%20Albinism.pdf

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  137. e says:
    @Harold
    He isn’t admitting that. He’s just saying that he doesn’t care, given the reality of white ‘dominance’ and ‘racism’ and his priority to keep his sons safe.

    That’s how I read it.

    Ever watch “Big Bang Theory”? Sheldon? Unable to recognize sarcasm?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harold
    Your comment is more vacuous as sarcasm.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. RudyM says:
    @RudyM
    Yan Shen, In recent decades, victimization (particularly violent victimization) of Asians has primarily come from blacks. Get real. I think many whites recognize that black violence extends to violence against Asians. Colin Flaherty certainly talks about it a lot.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31niuEQfr7k

    (I wish he would blab less.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Twinkie says:
    @Thomm

    I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton,
     
    er... it is pretty obvious why this is :

    i) Asian-Americans, particularly 2nd-gen or later (i.e. born in the US) are far less numerous.
    ii) Asians don't have 250 years of history behind them as a simmering dispute.
    iii) The government cannot profit from politicizing Asian identity they way it can by politicizing black identity.
    iv) Asian success is being concealed by the left, but Asians are not politically savvy enough to realize it and fight back.
    v) Blacks still (wrongly) assume that Asians will be their allies in some anti-white alliance.
    vi) Asians are not united. Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and Korean Americans don't socialize with each other.
    vii) East Asians quite readily adopt a Western first name and nominally convert to Christianity, so it is like they almost want to be invisible.

    South Asians are interesting, since they don't change their names, don't convert to Christianity, have much more experience with democracy and the English language, and are even more successful than East Asians in America. Many of the earlier ones were Republicans (Dinesh D'Souza, Bobby Jindal). But some later ones are Democrats.

    Some of your points are reasonable, but contain glaring errors of understanding, namely:

    East Asians quite readily adopt a Western first name and nominally convert to Christianity

    The adoption of Christianity among East Asians is overwhelmingly a Korean phenomenon. Japanese Christians are very few in number (if influential in Japan). Christianity is growing massively in China, to be sure, but it is still a tiny minority religion. In contrast, Christianity is the plurality religion in South Korea, and it exercises an outsized social, economic, and political influence there. Moreover, something like 70-80% of Koreans in the United States attend churches, making Korean-Americans even more Christian than their counterparts in South Korea. Finally, they are not “nominal” Christians. When East Asians (especially Koreans) become Christians, they tend to be quite fervent. South Korea sends out more Christian missionaries into the world than any other nation, except the United States.

    Many of the earlier ones were Republicans (Dinesh D’Souza, Bobby Jindal). But some later ones are Democrats.

    South Asians were never Republicans in large numbers at any time, despite the likes of D’Souza and Jindal. They tend to vote overwhelmingly for the Democrats, usually in the 90-10 range. According to the Manhattan Institute’s long-running study on immigrant assimilation, Indians also display the lowest rate of assimilation among Asian immigrants.

    Much of the changes in the average political and social behaviors of “Asian immigrants” can be attributed to the fact that the fastest growing segment of Asian immigrants is the South Asian category (while East Asian migration outside of China is declining rapidly), and they are very different from earlier East Asian immigrants in several important respects.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yan Shen
    Yeah I was going to make the same point about East Asian religiosity. China and Japan are two of the most secular countries in the world.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPicZApvRYI

    In this study that Cenk of the Young Turks talks about, Japan and China actually rank 64 and 65 out of 65 countries in a survey on religiosity. South Korea is significantly more religious than either China or Japan, but according to the wikipedia, "only" 28% of South Koreans identify as Christian. South Korean Americans though seem to be majority Christian from what I've observed...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_South_Korea

    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Marty T says:
    @Cagey Beast
    We need to have a mass movement in favour of the freedom of association. The Alt Right can daydream about their ethnostate over the rainbow but the rest of us need to fight for our right not to associate with people like Ekow N. Yankah. I don't think he has a clue how nice White people have been to him so far. I don't think any of the "Coalition of the Ascendant" have the least frigging clue about that.

    I predict they're going to find out in the years to come. We already had mid-20th century White liberalism go on unmodified for about three decades longer than it should have. We already have decades of pent-up reactionary political energy coming at these people like a broken chainsaw blade and they publish this? Well okay, I wouldn't have played your hand that way but it's your call, liberal "elite".

    Problem is most people have never heard of “freedom of association”. People are so brainwashed they think “discrimination” is the worst thing in society. So it’s a long fight.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. CCZ says:
    @Yan Shen
    I don't think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans. He mostly blames them for the woes afflicting black America and repeatedly urges white Americans to be more open about their supposed privilege and racism.

    Now I agree that all of this seems rather misguided. However, TNC's crime isn't so much that he's wrong, but that he obsesses over race constantly in an unproductive fashion. The fact that society fawns over him for doing so, as correctly observed in the quote above, really sticks in some people's craw. It's mind boggling how anyone could think that anything TNC has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight.

    John Derbyshire, while he may be narrowly speaking correct on the facts, turns off some people not because he's wrong or politically incorrect, but because some of us don't see the productive value in basically shouting endlessly from the top of your lungs, over and over again, to anyone within 100 miles willing to listen that on average blacks are less intelligent and more prone to violence compared to members of other ethnic groups. This doesn't seem like a particularly constructive way for blacks and whites to move forward, hand in hand, as Mr. Derbyshire often likes to say. Rather it seems like a great way to piss people off.

    A man of Mr. Derbyshire's intellect should be able to more smartly and constructively get his points across, in a way more likely to lead to tangible action.

    As I like to say, there are three things certain in this world, death, taxes, and Mr. Derbyshire warning us week after week after week after week about the Black Menace!

    “I don’t think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans.”

    I respectfully disagree.

    From Coates interview with Ezra Klein from VOX:

    “Every nickel of wealth the average black family has, the average white family has a dollar. What is the world in which that wealth gap is closed? What happens? What makes that possible? What does that look like? What is the process?”

    When he tries to describe the events that would erase America’s wealth gap, that would see the end of white supremacy, his thoughts flicker to the French Revolution, to the executions and the terror.

    “It’s very easy for me to see myself being contemporary with processes that might make for an equal world, more equality, and maybe the complete abolition of race as a construct, and being horrified by the process, maybe even attacking the process. I think these things don’t tend to happen peacefully.”

    For Coates, even hope can be covered in blood.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Yan Shen says:
    @Twinkie
    Some of your points are reasonable, but contain glaring errors of understanding, namely:

    East Asians quite readily adopt a Western first name and nominally convert to Christianity
     
    The adoption of Christianity among East Asians is overwhelmingly a Korean phenomenon. Japanese Christians are very few in number (if influential in Japan). Christianity is growing massively in China, to be sure, but it is still a tiny minority religion. In contrast, Christianity is the plurality religion in South Korea, and it exercises an outsized social, economic, and political influence there. Moreover, something like 70-80% of Koreans in the United States attend churches, making Korean-Americans even more Christian than their counterparts in South Korea. Finally, they are not "nominal" Christians. When East Asians (especially Koreans) become Christians, they tend to be quite fervent. South Korea sends out more Christian missionaries into the world than any other nation, except the United States.

    Many of the earlier ones were Republicans (Dinesh D’Souza, Bobby Jindal). But some later ones are Democrats.
     
    South Asians were never Republicans in large numbers at any time, despite the likes of D'Souza and Jindal. They tend to vote overwhelmingly for the Democrats, usually in the 90-10 range. According to the Manhattan Institute's long-running study on immigrant assimilation, Indians also display the lowest rate of assimilation among Asian immigrants.

    Much of the changes in the average political and social behaviors of "Asian immigrants" can be attributed to the fact that the fastest growing segment of Asian immigrants is the South Asian category (while East Asian migration outside of China is declining rapidly), and they are very different from earlier East Asian immigrants in several important respects.

    Yeah I was going to make the same point about East Asian religiosity. China and Japan are two of the most secular countries in the world.

    In this study that Cenk of the Young Turks talks about, Japan and China actually rank 64 and 65 out of 65 countries in a survey on religiosity. South Korea is significantly more religious than either China or Japan, but according to the wikipedia, “only” 28% of South Koreans identify as Christian. South Korean Americans though seem to be majority Christian from what I’ve observed…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_South_Korea

    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.
    , @jim jones
    The Chinese may not be religious but they sure are superstitious:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdJ5LNr32bQ
    , @anonymous coward

    China and Japan are two of the most secular countries in the world.
     
    Coincidentally, these are also the two countries where Christianity was persecuted with the full force of a totalitarian government.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. @Yan Shen
    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would've been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't have to hear about how racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he's the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can't have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren't for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn't mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that's become par for the course for polite society...

    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion,

    That is, practically word for word, the same line that the northern Abolitionists used 170 years ago, that lecturesome Western European liberals used in the middle 20th century, and that anybody uses who lacks direct experience with a large population of feral Blacks. How quaint that your should be bringing it up again.

    This is a sentimental notion, born of naivete, that leads to catastrophe each and every time it breaks out. It must have escaped your notice that Whites have spent unfathomable amounts of money and have more or less dismantled their entire social infrastructure in order to accommodate Blacks, to “treat them like fellow citizens,” and yet here we are today anyway.

    And now it is the Blacks themselves demanding re-segregation, but Whites are still supposed to be bend over backwards to include them where they themselves no longer want to be included. How far can such nonsense be pushed? This is a bad marriage that should have broken up decades ago. Maybe it’s time for White liberals to practice what they preach and actually listen to the demands of Black voices.

    It’s over. And I’m keeping the jewelry.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. Twinkie says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.

    1. I don’t think most whites are “singularly obsessed with… race.” A lot of left-wing commentators and would-be activists are, but they are a tiny fraction of the population. Of course, they do set what is acceptable in public discourse for most whites, unfortunately.

    2. There ARE “Asian-Americans” who are obsessed with race, and that obsession, as such, as been pushed heavily by public institutions (of indoctrination) such as universities. The push tends to be somewhat ineffective, because Asian-American are neither united by language (as Hispanics are) nor by conception of a common race (as blacks are). Also, most Asians in America are still first- or second-generation, so they are busy assimilating and making lives for themselves, not participating in the politico-ideological struggles of the country. But that’s changing (more on that another time, perhaps).

    3. To the extent that any racial group is “singularly obsessed” with race, it is blacks, or more accurately, people with any modicum of black ancestry. One can write several books on why that is, but I suppose we can summarize it with two points thusly: a) the major institutions (media, academia, etc.) encourage it and b) there are significant benefits.

    John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton

    I would not categorize the above individuals together for any reasonable purpose. They are very different in focus, intelligence, probity, and temperament even if they all comment on race from time to time (some more than others).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. Twinkie says:
    @Yan Shen
    Sorry meant to say that Asians in this country are often the victims of anti-Asian violence and prejudice at the hands of blacks. While blacks and whites in this country obsess tirelessly over themselves and each other, one of the great human rights tragedies, as I've pointed out numerous times, is the silent victimization that Asian Americans in this country face, oftentimes at the hands of blacks, Hispanics, and whites alike!

    the silent victimization that Asian Americans in this country face, oftentimes at the hands of blacks, Hispanics, and whites alike!

    You are absolutely, positively WRONG about this statement.

    Asians face little violence from whites, and only somewhat more from Hispanics. The overwhelming amount of violence and destruction visited upon Asians in the United States come from blacks, period.

    Even a casual perusal of the crime statistics should make this fact obvious.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yan Shen
    I said victimization, not necessarily violence. Anti-Asian racism is pretty common among blacks, whites, and Hispanics, as Chris Rock, Alexandra Wallace, or Yuli Gurriel all prove.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @Thomm

    I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton,
     
    er... it is pretty obvious why this is :

    i) Asian-Americans, particularly 2nd-gen or later (i.e. born in the US) are far less numerous.
    ii) Asians don't have 250 years of history behind them as a simmering dispute.
    iii) The government cannot profit from politicizing Asian identity they way it can by politicizing black identity.
    iv) Asian success is being concealed by the left, but Asians are not politically savvy enough to realize it and fight back.
    v) Blacks still (wrongly) assume that Asians will be their allies in some anti-white alliance.
    vi) Asians are not united. Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and Korean Americans don't socialize with each other.
    vii) East Asians quite readily adopt a Western first name and nominally convert to Christianity, so it is like they almost want to be invisible.

    South Asians are interesting, since they don't change their names, don't convert to Christianity, have much more experience with democracy and the English language, and are even more successful than East Asians in America. Many of the earlier ones were Republicans (Dinesh D'Souza, Bobby Jindal). But some later ones are Democrats.

    You left out the most obvious factor: (East) Asians who obsess about their own race would tend to stay home in Asia!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    You left out the most obvious factor: (East) Asians who obsess about their own race would tend to stay home in Asia!
     
    Probably.

    On the other hand, until recently these countries were mono-racial, so the obsession really wasn't racial per se. It tended (and tends) to be ethno-racial, e.g. "We Japanese are SO awesome unlike those smelly Koreans!"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Twinkie says:
    @Jack Hanson
    Andrew's entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.

    As Tiny Duck is parody of the hard Left, Andrew is a parody of a Richard Spencer big brain.

    going full Pinochet

    Free helicopter rides for SJWs and leftist activists!

    As Tiny Duck is parody of the hard Left, Andrew is a parody of a Richard Spencer big brain.

    That’s funny.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    Theres a guy tweeting as General Pinochet and he makes a very valid point that the Left has been on a temper tantrum for the last 60 years, and has grown into a monster that eventually will have to be confronted. The best thing, in his words, would be a sudden swift hard confrontation now, to prevent the bloodbath that's going to come.

    Unfortunately, in the great American tradition, we will kick the can down the road.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. Yan Shen says:
    @Twinkie

    the silent victimization that Asian Americans in this country face, oftentimes at the hands of blacks, Hispanics, and whites alike!
     
    You are absolutely, positively WRONG about this statement.

    Asians face little violence from whites, and only somewhat more from Hispanics. The overwhelming amount of violence and destruction visited upon Asians in the United States come from blacks, period.

    Even a casual perusal of the crime statistics should make this fact obvious.

    I said victimization, not necessarily violence. Anti-Asian racism is pretty common among blacks, whites, and Hispanics, as Chris Rock, Alexandra Wallace, or Yuli Gurriel all prove.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    I said victimization, not necessarily violence. Anti-Asian racism is pretty common among blacks, whites, and Hispanics
     
    Still not the case. If anti-Asian racism were that common among whites, the intermarriage rates would not be what they have been. For that matter, the housing pattern would also be very different.
    , @William Badwhite
    "Anti-Asian racism is pretty common among blacks, whites"

    Feel free to go home. You came here. Uninvited. Frankly, any decent treatment you receive is more than you deserve.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. Twinkie says:
    @Reg Cæsar
    You left out the most obvious factor: (East) Asians who obsess about their own race would tend to stay home in Asia!

    You left out the most obvious factor: (East) Asians who obsess about their own race would tend to stay home in Asia!

    Probably.

    On the other hand, until recently these countries were mono-racial, so the obsession really wasn’t racial per se. It tended (and tends) to be ethno-racial, e.g. “We Japanese are SO awesome unlike those smelly Koreans!”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    On the other hand, until recently these countries were mono-racial, so the obsession really wasn’t racial per se. It tended (and tends) to be ethno-racial,
     
    "Race" was once commonly used for "nation" as well, as in "the Irish race".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Yan Shen
    Here's the deeper point to consider in all of this. White Americans basically fucked themselves and everyone else in this country over with their prior bad behavior. Even if you aren't someone who's particular worked up over the morality of slavery or Jim Crow or outright racism towards blacks that characterized much of say the pre 1960s history of America, from a practical perspective this prior history of bad behavior has basically forced all of us who came later in this country to be at the whim of black worship and anti-racism for basically the rest of eternity. In the same respect, the extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now we'll all have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till The End of Time.

    Which quite frankly really, really sucks. Who wants to hear society fawn over and over again about the supposed genius of Ta Nehisi Coates?

    Even worse, through the psychological phenomenon of projection and despite the fact that Asians have no real history of antagonism towards blacks in this country and in fact are often the victims of anti-black violence and prejudice, Asian Americans are often slandered as being supposedly racist towards blacks, when in fact much of the negative perception that Asians may harbor simply reflects what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality...

    If your ancestors didn’t fight in the Civil War you’ll never really ‘get’ race relations in America.

    That doesn’t just rule out Asians, Indians, etc., but also a lot of whites, including bona fide WASPs like Derbyshire.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    If your ancestors didn’t fight in the Civil War you’ll never really ‘get’ race relations in America.
     
    My ancestors didn't fight in the American Civil War, but I get it just fine. Indeed, I get it better than many - perhaps most - white people in America.
    , @guest
    I have no idea what you're talking about.

    I share my first and last name with an ancestor in the Union Army, but that fact truly has no bearing on my understanding of current race-relations. Most of my life I was benighted and decidedly un-"woke" on the subject.

    Race-relations in this amnesiac country aren't determined by the remote past. Our perceptions of it, perhaps, but not as filtered through lineage. Lots of people's understanding is 180 degrees away from how their ancestors viewed things a mere couple generations ago.
    , @Jack D
    What is the mechanism by which this operates? Are you born with a genetic memory of Bull Run? Does this apply to other historic events also? If your ancestors came in the early 19th century, does this make you incapable of "getting" the American Revolution? What if half your family fought in the Civil War (does it matter which side?) and half came later - do you get it half way?

    Steve's Law of Female Journalism posits that female journalists would like to remake the world in such a way that they personally would be considered "hotter" under this reordered system. Let me guess - did you have ancestors who fought in the Civil War?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Why are some Whites on the right upset that people of color don’t want to be their friends?

    Does it upset the civil nationalism concept?

    I welcome more open social division. It’s good for us.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Why are some Whites on the right upset that people of color don’t want to be their friends?
     
    I don't think they are upset because blacks don't want to be their friends. They are (and should be) upset, because 1) they are blamed for blacks not being friends with whites and 2) they are pilloried for having the same attitude toward blacks.

    I am not white and am "a person of color" (whatever that means), but I share the dismay of the whites regarding this situation, and find the author of the cited piece "reprllent." He is a hypocrite and a race hustler/propagandist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack Hanson
    Citizenism is more Boomer inability to face the hard things that have to be done.

    The future is tribalism.

    The future is tribalism.

    I would argue that the present is tribalism. It’s merely a matter of some deluded people that think it doesn’t apply to them. Those people are the ones, normally, who have the most to lose from this delusion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    I would argue that the present is tribalism. It’s merely a matter of some deluded people that think it doesn’t apply to them.
     
    The problem here is one of definition. How does one define tribe? It's not clear that it simply means race. There are a lot of factors that enter into "tribe" in the U.S., race, ethnicity, class, education level, social standing, regional origin, etc. just to name a few.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack Hanson
    Andrew's entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.

    As Tiny Duck is parody of the hard Left, Andrew is a parody of a Richard Spencer big brain.

    Andrew’s entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.

    The left is infuriating but it still doesn’t deserve the Pinochet treatment.

    If the U.S. were a Latin American country, by now there would have been several assassination/coup attempts against Trump, against a backdrop of continual nationwide low-level violence against government supporters and officials. The U.S. isn’t there yet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    I think the idea is we get there first. You know, before the whole left starts acting like its feral vibrant shock troops.

    Which won't happen.
    , @Jack Hanson
    Wear a Trump Hat in Berkely and let me know how that works out for you.

    We are already there. For those of us paying attention, two churches have already been shot up by the Left, Rep. Scalise was nearly killed by a Bernie Bro, and Sen. Paul got a number of broken bones by his socialist neighbor.

    And that's off the top of my head. You better start believing in civil wars, cause you're in one.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. Hubbub says:

    LOL!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  155. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Yan Shen
    Yeah I was going to make the same point about East Asian religiosity. China and Japan are two of the most secular countries in the world.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPicZApvRYI

    In this study that Cenk of the Young Turks talks about, Japan and China actually rank 64 and 65 out of 65 countries in a survey on religiosity. South Korea is significantly more religious than either China or Japan, but according to the wikipedia, "only" 28% of South Koreans identify as Christian. South Korean Americans though seem to be majority Christian from what I've observed...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_South_Korea

    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hail

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.
     
    Good one. And true.

    In the West they do seem to be SJWs at a high rate, though.
    , @Twinkie

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.
     
    A long time ago, I was reading a travel guide for Southeast Asia. It listed various social faux pas for each country (e.g. don't show the bottom of your shoe, etc.). Pretty inane stuff. The one listed for Singapore made me laugh. It was:

    "Singapore: Don't be poor."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Rod1963 says:
    @Tacitus
    In Australia we have a small number of Africans. In advertisements if they have 2 children, often one is African. This is kind of ridiculous and hardly represents the average Australian setting. Very rarely do you see a white child and an Aboriginal child holding hands in an advertisement. Nor do you see an Asian or Indian child.

    Blacks have a glamour that the other boring kids don’t possess. Ridiculous.

    It’s probably ads imported from the U.S.

    It’s even on the Mexican cable channels here in the U.S. as well. They just replaced the English commentator with a Mexican one. It’s really odd because Mexicans do not like Blacks at all. In Los Angeles, Chicago and several East coast cities there are plenty of documented cases of ethnic cleansing of black neighborhoods by Mexicans. It’s a very sensitive topic that gets no air time because it destroys the racial narrative that the elites have pushed that the whites are the cause of all problems.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Henry's Cat

    In Los Angeles, Chicago and several East coast cities there are plenty of documented cases of ethnic cleansing of black neighborhoods by Mexicans.
     
    Care to share some?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. @eD
    This is actually an interesting comment, but then you get articles like this:

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/12/08/504667607/life-expectancy-in-u-s-drops-for-first-time-in-decades-report-finds

    This is from NPR, which is not exactly known for samizadat.

    Granted, when I googled "life expectancy in the US", I immediately got the answer that it is 78.8 years, which I dont't think it has ever been, and has been rising, and has never declined, though I remember several articles about the decline in life expectancy last year and the year before, but who knows? I think something has been going on.

    Yeah, part of this is conflated terms because life expectancy is affected by a ton of things as it’s overall health; there’s obesity and all that. For decades it’s been pointed out that obesity and other health issues could come back to bite Americans, in terms of overall life expectancy or whatever, that’s not new in the literature. Then you have the “White Death” which is a poorly defined concept with the term mostly only heard around the alt-right anyway, and the opioid epidemic which is much more narrow, and also, applies to different groups besides the “White Death.” (Remember part of this whole White Death mania started by a clear error in counting and adjusting for the ages of people wrong, and it’s not like white people are the only ones doing drugs or anything)

    Honestly the takes have always been in a terrible direction on this topic, veering into lunacy. An even more cynical but plausible view would be that the current hysteria is somehow a ploy by, say, Big Tobacco (far more Americans, including whites still die from tobacco-related maladies than the current wave of illegal drugs) to distract from their own bad publicity.

    What’s really going in the media again is cognitive dissonance where neoliberal, establish Dems just can’t believe they have lost the support they lost; people can’t believe their middle class neighborhoods voted Republican or something. So they have to invent innumerate crazy canards; admittedly many alt-right bloggers aren’t so innumerate but people make wildly wrong estimates all the time. (POTUS does not help, but he’s a moron, not a 4D chessmaster). The situation is not that there are 20 million “coal miners” in the US and a million die from unnatural causes each year, and neoliberals are morally justified in trashtalking them, but laypeople don’t grok large numbers, can hardly tell between a million and a thousand and so on.

    As for the drug epidemic talk itself, I think this will really confirm in the end qualitative things many experts already knew. By analogy, drug epidemics can be like forest fires, they eventually burn out in one generation until a new generation comes along, and that would often be with a new drug. Some of the far out media reports are likely caused again by innumeracy, because some events would be treated by the authorities more as mass murder or terrorism if the narratives were true, but the thousands of people across a country as big as ours being involved in drugs is just statistics. Not clear there is anything different in the cold, statistical perspective (obviously being sympathetic to the thousands of people involved is a qualm) than prior epidemics in the US involving cocaine, alcohol etc

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. Stogumber says:

    There are real and unreal problems.
    A real problem: A black person complains that her doctor doesn’t prescribe her a pain-killer.
    An unreal problem: “Studies show us that …”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  159. Hail says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.

    Good one. And true.

    In the West they do seem to be SJWs at a high rate, though.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    In the West they do seem to be SJWs at a high rate, though.
     
    No. There is a lot of selection bias.
    , @Desiderius

    In the West they do seem to be SJWs at a high rate, though.
     
    That's where the mammon is.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Whiskey says: • Website

    ymous — I’d say the impeachment of Trump is a given and was the moment Mueller was appointed. Paul Rino and Sing a Long with Mitch McConnell are just fine with that. As they would be with a President Hillary or Maxine Waters or whoever the Dems want. The Republican and Democrat party are just minor factions of the same establishment party. Trump is another matter even given his flaws and half-hearted approach to everything, lifelong Democrat as he was.

    As for “woke” Whites getting enough of this — nope, it will never stop. That Professor Yank-ya or whatever feels free to spew this anti White hatred out along with Nehi Coates is just a function of anti White (male) hatred of most of the female White population.

    Contra Steve, there are no end of ways in which (most) White men and women are enemies. This was not always the case but women’s full equality made them … fully equal. And as that noted feminist and women’s rights activist Matthew Weiner observed, inequality makes for an exciting bedroom, while equality a boring one. Anti-White stuff is just the expression of the rage and contempt most Middle Class White women feel for 90% of their male peers being ordinary and not dominant, constantly measuring who is more muy macho.

    In Sweden, Norway, Denmark, France, England, and Germany they’ve imported new Men with the IQs of rocks who will molest camels to solve their dominance gap. Here in the US its exaltation of Africans and those descended from them; over White beta males. And the end game is simply White Male Slavery. Do the math. Professor Yank-Ya is not going to go back to Ghana and live now is he? And he certainly won’t live like a Ghanian. That means in a majority non-White America which is defacto the case; White men MUST be enslaved to make enough money to support the ruling caste of dominant non-White men and their White women allies and concubines.

    That Professor Yank-Ya is just doing something dominant that is guaranteed to get female approval is a given. The only response possible is one-upping the dominance directly and dramatically on Professor Yank-Ya in a way that is perfectly legal and public spirited — I’d say its a non-trivial chance that the Professor is involved in something illegal and nasty — he’s Ghanian after all and even Nigerians figure Ghanians are all crooks. It is vitally important that White men respond to Professor Yank-Ya’s message of dominance with one of their own, one that is incapable of being misunderstood and is very clear such actions like Yank-Yas have consequences.

    Things like: helping victims of sexual harassment by the Professor make their accusations (he *IS* an African and pattern recognition makes this a non-trivial chance). Also publicizing tax evasion, nasty financial shelters, and figuring out just WHERE this guy makes all his money. [Which is what I want to know.]

    Side note: if White men respond to provocations with counter-dominance that one ups (no Richard Spencer torchlight parades, lots of digging up dirt on dirty people) the message of dominance will be understood by women who have no loyalty just a genetic draw to whatever group of men is most dominant in the moment. That swings both ways.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  161. Discard says:
    @Yan Shen
    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would've been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't have to hear about how racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he's the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can't have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren't for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn't mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that's become par for the course for polite society...

    If you had any real experience with the average Black, you’d know very well why we had segregation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. Seems to be some confusion, so let’s point out that Ekow is the black man.

    The combination of Jewish and Africa nose genes would be interesting to observe from an anthropological standpoint.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  163. Discard says:
    @Yan Shen
    Sorry meant to say that Asians in this country are often the victims of anti-Asian violence and prejudice at the hands of blacks. While blacks and whites in this country obsess tirelessly over themselves and each other, one of the great human rights tragedies, as I've pointed out numerous times, is the silent victimization that Asian Americans in this country face, oftentimes at the hands of blacks, Hispanics, and whites alike!

    The bar for great human rights tragedies must be pretty low.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. @Rod1963
    It's probably ads imported from the U.S.

    It's even on the Mexican cable channels here in the U.S. as well. They just replaced the English commentator with a Mexican one. It's really odd because Mexicans do not like Blacks at all. In Los Angeles, Chicago and several East coast cities there are plenty of documented cases of ethnic cleansing of black neighborhoods by Mexicans. It's a very sensitive topic that gets no air time because it destroys the racial narrative that the elites have pushed that the whites are the cause of all problems.

    In Los Angeles, Chicago and several East coast cities there are plenty of documented cases of ethnic cleansing of black neighborhoods by Mexicans.

    Care to share some?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wick
    This is the one I am aware of:
    http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/25/local/la-me-0126-compton-20130126

    Another is this one which mentions Mexican gangs in the 90s: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0208-quinones-parks-gangs-20150208-story.html

    There are a few articles like this around. I remember there was a thread on 4chan a few years back. I am unfamilar with occurrences outside of L.A though.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Alden says:
    @Cloudbuster
    I'm imagining Mrs. Yankah as in possession of a gargantuan case of self-hatred. Imagine how she must humiliate herself daily to prove herself worthy of being Mr. Yankah's wife despite her racist white skin.

    I thought the jewish ultra left women who pursued black men just because they were black ended about 40 years ago. She doesn’t hate herself. She hates Whites so much she decided to produce more blacks.

    Maybe she hopes her sons will be Senators and Presidents like Obama. Her background must be very interesting. I wonder if her grandma was one of those Jewish girls who joined the Prison Law Project to entice the black criminals to join the revolution.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. jim jones says:
    @Yan Shen
    Yeah I was going to make the same point about East Asian religiosity. China and Japan are two of the most secular countries in the world.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPicZApvRYI

    In this study that Cenk of the Young Turks talks about, Japan and China actually rank 64 and 65 out of 65 countries in a survey on religiosity. South Korea is significantly more religious than either China or Japan, but according to the wikipedia, "only" 28% of South Koreans identify as Christian. South Korean Americans though seem to be majority Christian from what I've observed...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_South_Korea

    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    The Chinese may not be religious but they sure are superstitious:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. Lurker says:

    Yankah the Wankah.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  168. MEH 0910 says:

    All races are okay, but some races are more okay than others.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  169. TangoMan says:
    @Krastos the Gluemaker
    The White Death doesn't really exist the way Sailer thinks it does, is one reason why. Deaton and Case's work of course was severely flawed from the start. It's not like they collected any data properly themselves and they made major mistakes in analyzing it. Here are some summaries.

    All of the discrepancies and then some that people are claiming exist in the 2000s era are actually, in hard numbers, accounted for by the deaths of military veterans, disproportionately white US adults, some in direct action in the War in Iraq and "War on Terror" but plenty in related circumstances that always result from wartime like suicide. Remember that adult white male death rates didn't meaningfully increase, even with this decade-plus effect. Of course both the media and political establishment don't like emphasizing this, and I guess a few partisan sources never put two and two together on reporting when they do talk about this, but don't realize the huge effects on death rates. (Remember that so few young people, like under age 60, die in the first place, that any shocks such as military deaths can cause huge percentage point effects. As one example, that came up long ago in looking at numbers like these, the 9/11 attacks just about doubled the homicide rate, which is how it's weirdly counted, for groups adult white males for a year-remember working age white adults were the modal victims of 9/11)

    Only somewhere in the tens millions of the leftwing, anti-war voters and Bernie supporters and so on could have told you this for fifteen years.

    While it is a little curious to suppose there is otherwise some novel discrepancy with white female adult death rates, there are a host of other factors including professional practice on the medicine end and data collection unaccounted for. Also, there are extremely subtle and complicated effects in both health and demography that could lead to counterintuitive results such as a decrease in childhood death rate that shows back up at older ages eventually, ceteris paribus. If someone with severe birth defects, for instance including Down Syndrome used to die at age 5, and now dies at age 40 in present-day society, that skews statistics.

    Lastly but at least second-most importantly, it's quite possible that bias in the US Census (which the organization freely admits often exist, and in fact the alt-right constantly assumes in other circumstances) has thrown off the objectively small percentage changes in death rates and whatnot that this is all about. The data sources are completely different, not necessarily reliable, and any error there would overwhelm all other effects. Instead of the number of deaths being meaningfully different, it could be the estimates of population that went wrong (and again, the Census often claims errors of 3-5% in measuring white vis-a-vis non-Hispanic white population)

    So, the much vaunted drug epidemic really mostly took off after 2010 and it's still not clear there that changes in data collection and attention don't make up a lot of the statistical hubbub compared to something like 50 years ago. We can't trust data from back then; doctors, families, etc would and did to an unknown extent coverup when people died of drugs or suicide or something and it would be attributed to other causes. It's possible the Internet age and changes in culture and technology are what changed the final data reporting, with nothing being qualitatively different from the past.

    Other than the few hundred people, in different age range groups than everyone made a fuss abou, in a few geographically concentrated areas a year the opiod epidemic has little large scale impact on deaths per se and isn't necessarily meaningfully different from other drug epidemics in the past. Nor is it even different from other pathologies common in the US from car accidents to homicide when compared on an international scale.

    Incidentally, though this has been said before, all the propaganda about the white "lower class" and their drug addictions and all in the media is a nonsensical effort to distract from the fact that the white "middle class" also has strongly shifted to the Republican party in the last few years. Even Sailer himself didn't know the numbers or made the wrong estimate; the white middle class went more R in 2012, 2014, and 2016 than MSM propagandists are trying to claim and erase.

    All of the discrepancies and then some that people are claiming exist in the 2000s era are actually, in hard numbers, accounted for by the deaths of military veterans, disproportionately white US adults, some in direct action in the War in Iraq and “War on Terror” but plenty in related circumstances that always result from wartime like suicide.

    Then let’s break this down and look only at suicides over the last 15 year and restrict the age range to those between 40 and 59, the time of middle aged despair.

    Data from the Centers for Disease Control.

    Sure looks like an increase both White men and women.

    https://imgur.com/a/ydzrR

    https://imgur.com/a/TEjv7

    https://imgur.com/a/v2Jox

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. Twinkie says:
    @Hail

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.
     
    Good one. And true.

    In the West they do seem to be SJWs at a high rate, though.

    In the West they do seem to be SJWs at a high rate, though.

    No. There is a lot of selection bias.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. Twinkie says:
    @Anonymous
    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.

    A long time ago, I was reading a travel guide for Southeast Asia. It listed various social faux pas for each country (e.g. don’t show the bottom of your shoe, etc.). Pretty inane stuff. The one listed for Singapore made me laugh. It was:

    “Singapore: Don’t be poor.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Twinkie says:
    @Yan Shen
    I said victimization, not necessarily violence. Anti-Asian racism is pretty common among blacks, whites, and Hispanics, as Chris Rock, Alexandra Wallace, or Yuli Gurriel all prove.

    I said victimization, not necessarily violence. Anti-Asian racism is pretty common among blacks, whites, and Hispanics

    Still not the case. If anti-Asian racism were that common among whites, the intermarriage rates would not be what they have been. For that matter, the housing pattern would also be very different.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Twinkie says:
    @Anonymous
    If your ancestors didn't fight in the Civil War you'll never really 'get' race relations in America.

    That doesn't just rule out Asians, Indians, etc., but also a lot of whites, including bona fide WASPs like Derbyshire.

    If your ancestors didn’t fight in the Civil War you’ll never really ‘get’ race relations in America.

    My ancestors didn’t fight in the American Civil War, but I get it just fine. Indeed, I get it better than many – perhaps most – white people in America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. Twinkie says:
    @Anonymous
    Why are some Whites on the right upset that people of color don't want to be their friends?

    Does it upset the civil nationalism concept?

    I welcome more open social division. It's good for us.

    Why are some Whites on the right upset that people of color don’t want to be their friends?

    I don’t think they are upset because blacks don’t want to be their friends. They are (and should be) upset, because 1) they are blamed for blacks not being friends with whites and 2) they are pilloried for having the same attitude toward blacks.

    I am not white and am “a person of color” (whatever that means), but I share the dismay of the whites regarding this situation, and find the author of the cited piece “reprllent.” He is a hypocrite and a race hustler/propagandist.

    Read More
    • Agree: Desiderius
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. Twinkie says:
    @Anonymous

    The future is tribalism.
     
    I would argue that the present is tribalism. It's merely a matter of some deluded people that think it doesn't apply to them. Those people are the ones, normally, who have the most to lose from this delusion.

    I would argue that the present is tribalism. It’s merely a matter of some deluded people that think it doesn’t apply to them.

    The problem here is one of definition. How does one define tribe? It’s not clear that it simply means race. There are a lot of factors that enter into “tribe” in the U.S., race, ethnicity, class, education level, social standing, regional origin, etc. just to name a few.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    How many combat deaths were there in Iraq/Afghanistan all told: about 6000? With a peak in 2006?

    Maybe ... I dunno ...
    , @Anon
    Christianity, particularly the RCC, experiences a degree of active persecution in China, which affects to some extent both its growth and the estimates thereof.

    How do old California (east) Asians vs. anticommunist refugees and their progeny vs. H1b guys (several other groups exist of course) vote?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. @Yan Shen
    Yeah I was going to make the same point about East Asian religiosity. China and Japan are two of the most secular countries in the world.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPicZApvRYI

    In this study that Cenk of the Young Turks talks about, Japan and China actually rank 64 and 65 out of 65 countries in a survey on religiosity. South Korea is significantly more religious than either China or Japan, but according to the wikipedia, "only" 28% of South Koreans identify as Christian. South Korean Americans though seem to be majority Christian from what I've observed...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_South_Korea

    In general, East Asians seem to be disinterested in religion, politics, race, and whatever else that seems to fascinate other ethnic groups around the world. This may also explain why in America, ethnic East Asians seem to clearly gravitate towards quantitative value creating STEM areas and away from the social sciences, humanities, business, politics, and to a lesser extent even the life sciences.

    China and Japan are two of the most secular countries in the world.

    Coincidentally, these are also the two countries where Christianity was persecuted with the full force of a totalitarian government.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. eah says:

    White Americans basically fucked themselves and everyone else in this country over with their prior bad behavior.

    True — and as the election of Trump proves, there’s nothing “prior” about it: we haven’t changed one whit, and never will — in fact, having non-whites living amongst us is the very definition of ‘cruel and unusual punishment’, and is therefore downright unconstitutional — so They Have To Go Back — not only for their own well-being, but for the sake of The Rule of Law — unfortunately, us miscreant Whites will of course be left alone in our misery, to further ‘fuck ourselves’ — but so it must be.

    One more thing: White Americans — there isn’t any other kind — not really.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  178. guest says:

    “while studies show that doctors underprescribe pain medication for African-Americans”

    Proof medicine is racist: it deprives Persons of Color of the opportunity to kill themselves with pain medication.

    We must close the Opioid-Death Gap.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  179. guest says:
    @Anonymous

    Andrew’s entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.
     
    The left is infuriating but it still doesn't deserve the Pinochet treatment.

    If the U.S. were a Latin American country, by now there would have been several assassination/coup attempts against Trump, against a backdrop of continual nationwide low-level violence against government supporters and officials. The U.S. isn't there yet.

    I think the idea is we get there first. You know, before the whole left starts acting like its feral vibrant shock troops.

    Which won’t happen.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    You really don't want to bring Latin American-style political violence to the U.S., but if it must come you must make sure the left is seen to fire the first shot.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. Svigor says:

    This is true of about 70% of blacks, but about 10-20% of whites (these whites become the WN wiggers that we see here).

    I’ve never seen a WN wigger. I’ve seen plenty of leftist wiggers, White-hating wiggers (e.g., you), Woggers (Wog *******), Jiggers (Jew *******), etc. But, no WN wiggers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  181. Karl says:
    @Thomm

    I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton,
     
    er... it is pretty obvious why this is :

    i) Asian-Americans, particularly 2nd-gen or later (i.e. born in the US) are far less numerous.
    ii) Asians don't have 250 years of history behind them as a simmering dispute.
    iii) The government cannot profit from politicizing Asian identity they way it can by politicizing black identity.
    iv) Asian success is being concealed by the left, but Asians are not politically savvy enough to realize it and fight back.
    v) Blacks still (wrongly) assume that Asians will be their allies in some anti-white alliance.
    vi) Asians are not united. Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and Korean Americans don't socialize with each other.
    vii) East Asians quite readily adopt a Western first name and nominally convert to Christianity, so it is like they almost want to be invisible.

    South Asians are interesting, since they don't change their names, don't convert to Christianity, have much more experience with democracy and the English language, and are even more successful than East Asians in America. Many of the earlier ones were Republicans (Dinesh D'Souza, Bobby Jindal). But some later ones are Democrats.

    91 Thomm > South Asians [...] don’t convert to Christianity

    i’ll mention your theory to all the Catholics (as in “Roman”) in Goa.

    Tell your son serving in ComFifthFleet, to check out the Goan maids in the RC church in town.

    If your son is a 7 who could land a 7 white bride, he’ll be able to land a 8-9 Goan Catholic girl.

    As pleasant as a provinciana filipina, but with a 5-10 IQ point advantage.

    Not many of those Goan women would even dream of breeding with a dindu, which is more than we can say about (e.g.) Nordic women.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie
    Goan Catholics are a minuscule minority in India.
    , @Thomm
    Christians are 2% of India's population.

    Extremely few take on Western first names, or convert to Christianity, upon arrival in the West.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. @George
    "who often get hooked after being overprescribed painkillers "

    An alternative theory for drug use, at least at the start, is so they can go back to work. If you don't have disability your only alternative is opioids. Meth is also used by very low-income workers to increase the hours they work.

    Partially pushed by trial lawyers, the over prescription theory of drug abuse is convenient because it means they can sue pharmaceutical companies and distributors not to mention doctors. Also not mentioned is that a consequence of the US occupation of Afghanistan is it is impossible to control opium production there, as it is said to have been when the Taliban were in control. Invade the world, invite the world, opiate the world.

    Most heroin in the U.S. comes from Latin America, and the second most important source of overdoses are synthetic fentanyl and related drugs from China.

    Heroin from all four source areas (Mexico, South America, Southwest Asia, and Southeast Asia) is available to varying degrees; however, analysis of DEA heroin indicator programs data, production and cultivation estimates, and seizure data indicates Mexico is the predominant source
    of heroin in the United States. South America is the second most common source of heroin. Smaller amounts of Southwest Asian heroin are available in certain areas, but most Southwest Asian heroin supplies markets in Africa, Asia, and Europe.

    https://www.dea.gov/resource-center/2016%20NDTA%20Summary.pdf

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. guest says:
    @Anonymous
    If your ancestors didn't fight in the Civil War you'll never really 'get' race relations in America.

    That doesn't just rule out Asians, Indians, etc., but also a lot of whites, including bona fide WASPs like Derbyshire.

    I have no idea what you’re talking about.

    I share my first and last name with an ancestor in the Union Army, but that fact truly has no bearing on my understanding of current race-relations. Most of my life I was benighted and decidedly un-”woke” on the subject.

    Race-relations in this amnesiac country aren’t determined by the remote past. Our perceptions of it, perhaps, but not as filtered through lineage. Lots of people’s understanding is 180 degrees away from how their ancestors viewed things a mere couple generations ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  185. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Krastos the Gluemaker
    The White Death doesn't really exist the way Sailer thinks it does, is one reason why. Deaton and Case's work of course was severely flawed from the start. It's not like they collected any data properly themselves and they made major mistakes in analyzing it. Here are some summaries.

    All of the discrepancies and then some that people are claiming exist in the 2000s era are actually, in hard numbers, accounted for by the deaths of military veterans, disproportionately white US adults, some in direct action in the War in Iraq and "War on Terror" but plenty in related circumstances that always result from wartime like suicide. Remember that adult white male death rates didn't meaningfully increase, even with this decade-plus effect. Of course both the media and political establishment don't like emphasizing this, and I guess a few partisan sources never put two and two together on reporting when they do talk about this, but don't realize the huge effects on death rates. (Remember that so few young people, like under age 60, die in the first place, that any shocks such as military deaths can cause huge percentage point effects. As one example, that came up long ago in looking at numbers like these, the 9/11 attacks just about doubled the homicide rate, which is how it's weirdly counted, for groups adult white males for a year-remember working age white adults were the modal victims of 9/11)

    Only somewhere in the tens millions of the leftwing, anti-war voters and Bernie supporters and so on could have told you this for fifteen years.

    While it is a little curious to suppose there is otherwise some novel discrepancy with white female adult death rates, there are a host of other factors including professional practice on the medicine end and data collection unaccounted for. Also, there are extremely subtle and complicated effects in both health and demography that could lead to counterintuitive results such as a decrease in childhood death rate that shows back up at older ages eventually, ceteris paribus. If someone with severe birth defects, for instance including Down Syndrome used to die at age 5, and now dies at age 40 in present-day society, that skews statistics.

    Lastly but at least second-most importantly, it's quite possible that bias in the US Census (which the organization freely admits often exist, and in fact the alt-right constantly assumes in other circumstances) has thrown off the objectively small percentage changes in death rates and whatnot that this is all about. The data sources are completely different, not necessarily reliable, and any error there would overwhelm all other effects. Instead of the number of deaths being meaningfully different, it could be the estimates of population that went wrong (and again, the Census often claims errors of 3-5% in measuring white vis-a-vis non-Hispanic white population)

    So, the much vaunted drug epidemic really mostly took off after 2010 and it's still not clear there that changes in data collection and attention don't make up a lot of the statistical hubbub compared to something like 50 years ago. We can't trust data from back then; doctors, families, etc would and did to an unknown extent coverup when people died of drugs or suicide or something and it would be attributed to other causes. It's possible the Internet age and changes in culture and technology are what changed the final data reporting, with nothing being qualitatively different from the past.

    Other than the few hundred people, in different age range groups than everyone made a fuss abou, in a few geographically concentrated areas a year the opiod epidemic has little large scale impact on deaths per se and isn't necessarily meaningfully different from other drug epidemics in the past. Nor is it even different from other pathologies common in the US from car accidents to homicide when compared on an international scale.

    Incidentally, though this has been said before, all the propaganda about the white "lower class" and their drug addictions and all in the media is a nonsensical effort to distract from the fact that the white "middle class" also has strongly shifted to the Republican party in the last few years. Even Sailer himself didn't know the numbers or made the wrong estimate; the white middle class went more R in 2012, 2014, and 2016 than MSM propagandists are trying to claim and erase.

    tl/dr, but…down in hopelessly cucked Australia, the Federal Government is ending over the counter access to anything containing Codeine from February 1, 2018.
    GlaxoSmithKline have confirmed that Panadeine and Panamax won’t be supplied after that date.

    People requiring pain relief will have to consult a Medical Practitioner [who obviously won't be writing a scrip for anything containing Codeine].

    The ban has bipartisan political support.

    My question is: did something similar happen in the U.S. in the recent past, and if so, could Australians expect an Opioid Epidemic in the future?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous coward

    My question is: did something similar happen in the U.S. in the recent past, and if so, could Australians expect an Opioid Epidemic in the future?
     
    Russia banned painkillers and subsequently saw opiate addictions plummet. The drug war really does work, provided you're not half-assed about it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. Jason Liu says:
    @Stationary Feast

    chinese people something not acceptable something
     
    Can Dan, Jason, or someone else help us out with the propaganda poster in the back?

    Left line: The Chinese people will not be bullied
    Center fist: The third world
    Right line: People of the world….

    Basically a communist era poster promoting third world solidarity against western imperialism

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. whorefinder says: • Website

    It’s almost like African-Americans and Middle Eastern-Americans have a vicious deranged hatred of European-Americans and wish them and their society harm.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  188. UMC chicks dig this shit because it keeps the (post-)white man’s burden nice and light.

    They want it all for themselves – you might call it an invisible knapsack.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  189. @Hail

    They have a god. His name is Mammon.
     
    Good one. And true.

    In the West they do seem to be SJWs at a high rate, though.

    In the West they do seem to be SJWs at a high rate, though.

    That’s where the mammon is.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. a reader says:
    @Forbes
    Derb was a contributor, not an employee, as such he was very publicly told his contributions were no longer needed. National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards. Cuck is the word that comes to mind. Have not read the mag or it's website since the NeverTrump issue in '15.
    Read More
    • Replies: @Forbes
    Thanks for that. My recollection was end of '15, but it makes sense that it was shortly after the primaries started.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. a reader says:
    @larry lurker
    I don't really speak Chinese but I was able to figure out enough of the characters using Google Translate's drawing input feature to find the full text:

    Left text: 中国人民不可辱 = The Chinese people cannot be humiliated/insulted/abused

    Right text: 世界人民不可欺 = The people of the world cannot be bullied/cheated/taken advantage of

    The fist: 第三世界 = The Third World

    Googling the complete text, I found two things. The first was a picture of an African woman at a market looking at the same poster. Caption (auto-translated): "It seems that such 'red' posters are no stranger to people in third world countries."

    The second was a full view of the poster on Instagram where we can finally see what the Third World fist is landing on: two aggressively white men in suits, both of whom appear to be bleeding out of their heads. (Or maybe that's just supposed to represent the impact of their heads hitting the ground...)

    Congratulations for your successful and enlightening sleuth’s work !

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. Wick says:
    @Henry's Cat

    In Los Angeles, Chicago and several East coast cities there are plenty of documented cases of ethnic cleansing of black neighborhoods by Mexicans.
     
    Care to share some?

    This is the one I am aware of:

    http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/25/local/la-me-0126-compton-20130126

    Another is this one which mentions Mexican gangs in the 90s: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0208-quinones-parks-gangs-20150208-story.html

    There are a few articles like this around. I remember there was a thread on 4chan a few years back. I am unfamilar with occurrences outside of L.A though.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @Twinkie

    I would argue that the present is tribalism. It’s merely a matter of some deluded people that think it doesn’t apply to them.
     
    The problem here is one of definition. How does one define tribe? It's not clear that it simply means race. There are a lot of factors that enter into "tribe" in the U.S., race, ethnicity, class, education level, social standing, regional origin, etc. just to name a few.

    How many combat deaths were there in Iraq/Afghanistan all told: about 6000? With a peak in 2006?

    Maybe … I dunno …

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. Twinkie says:
    @Karl
    91 Thomm > South Asians [...] don’t convert to Christianity


    i'll mention your theory to all the Catholics (as in "Roman") in Goa.

    Tell your son serving in ComFifthFleet, to check out the Goan maids in the RC church in town.

    If your son is a 7 who could land a 7 white bride, he'll be able to land a 8-9 Goan Catholic girl.

    As pleasant as a provinciana filipina, but with a 5-10 IQ point advantage.


    Not many of those Goan women would even dream of breeding with a dindu, which is more than we can say about (e.g.) Nordic women.

    Goan Catholics are a minuscule minority in India.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    But not all Catholics in India are Goanese.

    Okay, the rest are a small minority too.
    , @Anon
    Sailing the Indian Ocean seems anecdotally for whatever reason to be a disproportionately Catholic profession.
    , @Karl
    177 Twinkie > Goan Catholics are a minuscule minority in India


    The Hollywood Jews are a miniscule minority West of the Mississippi
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. ChrisZ says:
    @Svigor
    Oh, wait, the author is black?

    So it's Woke N-word Haknay?

    Seriously?

    Alternatively, Svigor, the last name could be read as a “rapper” pronunciation of “Yanker,” as in “one who yanks your chain.”

    If you’re suggesting this is yet another hoax, I have to say the suggestion has merit. All the little ironies mentioned here—the name, the Commie poster, the wife, the parallel to Derbyshire’s 2012 piece, the berth at Cardozo Law School—are just too perfect: like items on a treasure hunt for iSteve readers.

    It would have to be an extremely elaborate hoax, involving a lot of internet hacking to produce the results listed throughout this comment thread. And it fooled the New York Times. But that would be part of the point: that nobody these days bothers to confirm matters of fact or identity beyond a rudimentary internet search.

    Compared to the other hoaxes we read about in this forum, this one (if it is one) would have a level of execution well above the amateur-hour antics of grad students, magazine writers, or Air Force academy cadets.

    Could it be the work of a clever alt-Righter? Or the Russians? (I’m being sarcastic with the last, but not the first.)

    Then again, if Woke Yanker is for real, then it’s more evidence that today’s Left is truly beyond parody.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    If Hankay Woke is a troll, he's a Long Con pro. I've been blogging about him since 2013:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-holy-war-against-pattern-recognition/

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. Bill P says:
    @Yan Shen
    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would've been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't have to hear about how racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he's the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can't have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren't for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn't mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that's become par for the course for polite society...

    You’re saying that if only whites had been nice to blacks after the Civil War, then this problem of blacks beating up Asians in California would not exist…

    So, according to your rationale, contemporary California Asians, such as you, are also victims of Jim Crow.

    Do you actually believe this, or is it, as I suspect, simply a convenient (and transparent) ploy to provide moral cover for a complaint about black criminality?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. AndrewR says:
    @Jack Hanson
    Andrew's entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.

    As Tiny Duck is parody of the hard Left, Andrew is a parody of a Richard Spencer big brain.

    Pinochet was far too sadistic for me to really admire him or want anyone to fully emulate him, but it’s hard not to be black-pilled by Trump and his low-info True Believing disciples. Trump doesn’t have much in the way of a coherent worldview or governing style, which allows him to be easily misled by tribesmen like Kushner. He is also unbelievably thin-skinned, which is obviously a dangerous trait for a leader.

    DJT must be viewed as merely a stepping-stone. It was refreshing to hear him break some political taboos during his campaign but that’s about all he’s been good for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    which allows him to be easily misled by tribesmen like Kushner.

    Somehow Trump, one of six real estate developers in the United States who has been an abiding presence on the Forbes 400 since Jared Kushner was a toddler, is led around by the nose by his son-in-law (who, evidently, has neutralized Don Jr and Eric as well).

    Do yourself a favor: stop believing in magic Jews.
    , @Jack Hanson
    Tell me more about the build up in your fan fiction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. @ChrisZ
    Alternatively, Svigor, the last name could be read as a “rapper” pronunciation of “Yanker,” as in “one who yanks your chain.”

    If you’re suggesting this is yet another hoax, I have to say the suggestion has merit. All the little ironies mentioned here—the name, the Commie poster, the wife, the parallel to Derbyshire’s 2012 piece, the berth at Cardozo Law School—are just too perfect: like items on a treasure hunt for iSteve readers.

    It would have to be an extremely elaborate hoax, involving a lot of internet hacking to produce the results listed throughout this comment thread. And it fooled the New York Times. But that would be part of the point: that nobody these days bothers to confirm matters of fact or identity beyond a rudimentary internet search.

    Compared to the other hoaxes we read about in this forum, this one (if it is one) would have a level of execution well above the amateur-hour antics of grad students, magazine writers, or Air Force academy cadets.

    Could it be the work of a clever alt-Righter? Or the Russians? (I’m being sarcastic with the last, but not the first.)

    Then again, if Woke Yanker is for real, then it’s more evidence that today’s Left is truly beyond parody.

    If Hankay Woke is a troll, he’s a Long Con pro. I’ve been blogging about him since 2013:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-holy-war-against-pattern-recognition/

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChrisZ
    Wasn’t it Voltaire who said: “If Woke N— Honkey-Yanker didn’t exist, we would have to invent him”?

    Thanks for your reply Steve. Such a long con is unlikely (was “Woke” even a thing in 2013?), so I guess my “Leftism beyond parody” conclusion applies.

    But I’d still like to see evidence of his existence that doesn’t come from an internet search.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. Nico says:
    @Art Deco
    National Review has divorced any number of writers, contributors for a level of honesty not up to their delicate standards.

    Not really. Their capable contributors generally leave in accordance with ordinary attrition and are replaced, if at all, with the sort of clot he's been able to recruit the last 15 years. The four the magazine has made a public point of cutting were Joseph Sobran, John O'Sullivan, Ann Coulter, and Derbyshire. Coulter is a provacateur and said something intemperate in the heat of the moment. I'm sure Sobran fancied himself honest, but 'pig-headed crank' captures his quality rather more accurately.

    I’m sure Sobran fancied himself honest, but ‘pig-headed crank’ captures his quality rather more accurately.

    I liked Joe Sobran, cranky or not. I can see how some humorless c__ts might consider him “pig-headed” but he was certainly more honest and more decent than WFB was (granted, that’s setting the bar incredibly low: even so, Sobran was undoubtedly a good man).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Buckley was neither dishonest nor indecent in his dealings with Sobran or anyone else.

    Over a period of nearly seven years, Buckley and other editors at National Review had remonstrated with Sobran that content in his sparsely syndicated column was injurious to the magazine's brand (as well as been substantively nonsense). Sobran himself brought matters to a head by writing a column for syndication skewering his employer. What Sobran did not quite realize is that his syndication was contingent on the imprimatur provided by National Review, and when NR canned him, the syndicate and CBS Radio followed suit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. Pericles says:
    @Thomm

    But there’s that 10% or so in each group to whom race seems like the most salient thing about this world.
     
    This is true of about 70% of blacks, but about 10-20% of whites (these whites become the WN wiggers that we see here).

    In other words, when the day comes, everyone will be happier if you stay on the other side of the fence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    In other words, when the day comes, everyone will be happier if you stay on the other side of the fence.
     
    I am an American. And unlike you, I believe in American values (which were never about white nationalism).

    Remember, as a WN wigger, you are *supposed* to be miserable. It is what nature intended, since you represent waste matter than nature wants to eliminate from the white gene pool. High-achieving whites can only arise if the waste matter generated in the process is carried out via wastebaskets that the bottom 10-20% of whites represent (the women of this wastebasket group become bluehaired feminists, the men become WN losers).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. Pericles says:
    @Yan Shen
    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would've been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't have to hear about how racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he's the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can't have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren't for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn't mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that's become par for the course for polite society...

    And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    See, there’s the problem. Those Asians should start treating blacks as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. Yada yada says:

    Dear Jews, we are no longer allowing you to tell us what we can think about ourselves and our people. Here’s a suggestion to you eternal trouble making misfits, take the next flight to Tel Aviv and stay the hell out of our lives.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  203. Neoconned says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside.
     
    So, we're fundamentally agreed, then? Professor, it's about cotton-pickin' time.

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it's the Blacks who are demanding segregation?

    First I can’t make it out but is his wife white? Looks that way to me…

    Second….the dude’s name….is he even American? Or African? If African, why don’t we just deport his insane ass back to his country of origin…..??

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. Nico says:
    @Yan Shen
    I don't think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans. He mostly blames them for the woes afflicting black America and repeatedly urges white Americans to be more open about their supposed privilege and racism.

    Now I agree that all of this seems rather misguided. However, TNC's crime isn't so much that he's wrong, but that he obsesses over race constantly in an unproductive fashion. The fact that society fawns over him for doing so, as correctly observed in the quote above, really sticks in some people's craw. It's mind boggling how anyone could think that anything TNC has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight.

    John Derbyshire, while he may be narrowly speaking correct on the facts, turns off some people not because he's wrong or politically incorrect, but because some of us don't see the productive value in basically shouting endlessly from the top of your lungs, over and over again, to anyone within 100 miles willing to listen that on average blacks are less intelligent and more prone to violence compared to members of other ethnic groups. This doesn't seem like a particularly constructive way for blacks and whites to move forward, hand in hand, as Mr. Derbyshire often likes to say. Rather it seems like a great way to piss people off.

    A man of Mr. Derbyshire's intellect should be able to more smartly and constructively get his points across, in a way more likely to lead to tangible action.

    As I like to say, there are three things certain in this world, death, taxes, and Mr. Derbyshire warning us week after week after week after week about the Black Menace!

    A man of Mr. Derbyshire’s intellect should be able to more smartly and constructively get his points across, in a way more likely to lead to tangible action.

    Do you have a suggestion? For example, an edit or a rewrite which is not only “narrowly speaking correct on the facts” but also gets the point across “more smartly and constructively” and “in a way more likely to lead to tangible action”?

    Don’t feel bad if the answer is “no.” Derbyshire’s essay elicited a hostile response, because it related three truths that no one wants to deal with no matter how they are expressed, namely

    1. American blacks count a disproportionate share of violent thugs among themselves, enough that it can be life-saving for a non-black to consider a congregation of a substantial number of them a statistical threat;
    2. There is a substantial fraction of influential people who argue and who act as though the aggregate danger should be discounted *and* that the actions of individuals (in criminality, scholarship, professional life and elsewhere) should not be held to cold hard “colorblind” standards because of “disparate impact”; and
    3. The need to nevertheless maintain a delicate social balance in light of the juxtaposition of 1 and 2 imposes substantial costs, material and human, on the productive sectors of society, with little overall salutary return having been demonstrated.

    There is no P.C. way to put this and there is no way it can NOT anger the SJW and cuck crowd, because the Eleanor Roosevelt principle of “always champion the underdog” has morphed into a sacrosanct victim-worship that parodies the Eucharistic sacrifice in Christianity. And as the liberals themselves have shown in studies, you cannot undo a belief so religiously held by condescendingly pointing out contradictory facts and logical fallacies in ritual Nice White Lady schoolteacher fashion. A negative blowback was inevitable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. Pericles says:

    I don’t mind at all if Ewok’s descendants will never meet mine, but I somehow get the feeling that the choice to withdraw or shut out will be one-sided.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  206. A physician from Ghana complaining about white people? Black Africans have contributed nothing to modern medicine, not a single solitary thing, were it not for white people he’d be squatting in front of a mud hut handing out monkey knuckles to the sick, so Yankah should just hold his ingrate tongue.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  207. @Yan Shen
    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would've been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't have to hear about how racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he's the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can't have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren't for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn't mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that's become par for the course for polite society...

    Excuse me, honorable Yan Shen. Here is a book about Negroes in their native state. This was the raw material whites had to work with. We are trying to build St. Paul’s Cathedral out of mud. Their innate nature has not evolved. Please read and let the scales fall from your eyes.

    https://archive.org/stream/negroesinnegrola00help/negroesinnegrola00help_djvu.txt

    or if you want a hard copy, try this,

    https://www.amazon.com/Negroes-Negroland-America-Generally-Involuntary/dp/1330220005/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1510575794&sr=1-1&keywords=the+negro+in+negroland&dpID=51NImHhmZ%252BL&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. a reader says:
    @Dr. X
    It's not OK for your kids to be white... but it sure is noble and pure and holy and salutary to have Negro drag queens host Story Hour for your five-year-old white kindergarteners...

    https://www.dragqueenstoryhour.org/

    Thanks for the instructive link; they appear to peddle their ware exclusively to White and Asian kids. For some reason, the lack of POC among the audience is not noticed, much less lamented by the enthousiastic reporters.

    As is always the case when degeneracy is involved, the E-S-T rule applies.

    However, couldn’t we too make good use of the conclusion line ? [at 0:55]

    If it’s not for you, you don’t have to come.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. In the annals of “post-hoc rationalization”, it’s hard to top a Black comedian I saw the other day who justified having a white wife by saying that their children would be considered either “Black” or “mixed-race” but never white, so by being with the white woman she was reducing the number of white people and that’s good, right? In the special, they conveniently didn’t cut to any Black women reacting (normally, as a group, they’re usually not too keen on the concept)…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  210. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Yan Shen
    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would've been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't have to hear about how racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he's the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can't have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren't for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn't mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that's become par for the course for polite society...

    But yeah, we can’t have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans.

    It’s a pity that your family chose to come here then, isn’t it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. Art Deco says:
    @Nico

    I’m sure Sobran fancied himself honest, but ‘pig-headed crank’ captures his quality rather more accurately.
     
    I liked Joe Sobran, cranky or not. I can see how some humorless c__ts might consider him "pig-headed" but he was certainly more honest and more decent than WFB was (granted, that's setting the bar incredibly low: even so, Sobran was undoubtedly a good man).

    Buckley was neither dishonest nor indecent in his dealings with Sobran or anyone else.

    Over a period of nearly seven years, Buckley and other editors at National Review had remonstrated with Sobran that content in his sparsely syndicated column was injurious to the magazine’s brand (as well as been substantively nonsense). Sobran himself brought matters to a head by writing a column for syndication skewering his employer. What Sobran did not quite realize is that his syndication was contingent on the imprimatur provided by National Review, and when NR canned him, the syndicate and CBS Radio followed suit.

    Read More
    • Agree: Johann Ricke
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. Art Deco says:
    @AndrewR
    Pinochet was far too sadistic for me to really admire him or want anyone to fully emulate him, but it's hard not to be black-pilled by Trump and his low-info True Believing disciples. Trump doesn't have much in the way of a coherent worldview or governing style, which allows him to be easily misled by tribesmen like Kushner. He is also unbelievably thin-skinned, which is obviously a dangerous trait for a leader.

    DJT must be viewed as merely a stepping-stone. It was refreshing to hear him break some political taboos during his campaign but that's about all he's been good for.

    which allows him to be easily misled by tribesmen like Kushner.

    Somehow Trump, one of six real estate developers in the United States who has been an abiding presence on the Forbes 400 since Jared Kushner was a toddler, is led around by the nose by his son-in-law (who, evidently, has neutralized Don Jr and Eric as well).

    Do yourself a favor: stop believing in magic Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Neither Don Jr. nor Eric strike me as terribly bright, and one of my greatest frustrations with their father is that he didn't call out Eric's comment that David Duke "deserves a bullet", nor did he force Eric to retract that statement.

    Apparently you have a vested interest in mocking legitimate concerns about Jewish Supremacy and Privilege as being irrational fretting about "Magic Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. @anon
    tl/dr, but...down in hopelessly cucked Australia, the Federal Government is ending over the counter access to anything containing Codeine from February 1, 2018.
    GlaxoSmithKline have confirmed that Panadeine and Panamax won't be supplied after that date.

    People requiring pain relief will have to consult a Medical Practitioner [who obviously won't be writing a scrip for anything containing Codeine].

    The ban has bipartisan political support.

    My question is: did something similar happen in the U.S. in the recent past, and if so, could Australians expect an Opioid Epidemic in the future?

    My question is: did something similar happen in the U.S. in the recent past, and if so, could Australians expect an Opioid Epidemic in the future?

    Russia banned painkillers and subsequently saw opiate addictions plummet. The drug war really does work, provided you’re not half-assed about it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    OTOH one could also ban Narcan and other opioid antagonists as well. We'd have a sudden sharp spike followed by a plunge in short order.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. Harold says:
    @e
    Ever watch "Big Bang Theory"? Sheldon? Unable to recognize sarcasm?

    Your comment is more vacuous as sarcasm.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous
    If your ancestors didn't fight in the Civil War you'll never really 'get' race relations in America.

    That doesn't just rule out Asians, Indians, etc., but also a lot of whites, including bona fide WASPs like Derbyshire.

    What is the mechanism by which this operates? Are you born with a genetic memory of Bull Run? Does this apply to other historic events also? If your ancestors came in the early 19th century, does this make you incapable of “getting” the American Revolution? What if half your family fought in the Civil War (does it matter which side?) and half came later – do you get it half way?

    Steve’s Law of Female Journalism posits that female journalists would like to remake the world in such a way that they personally would be considered “hotter” under this reordered system. Let me guess – did you have ancestors who fought in the Civil War?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. For all his fine talk the author himself continues to be employed by Whites and not Blacks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  217. Corvinus says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside.
     
    So, we're fundamentally agreed, then? Professor, it's about cotton-pickin' time.

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it's the Blacks who are demanding segregation?

    “So, we’re fundamentally agreed, then? Professor, it’s about cotton-pickin’ time. Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?”

    Mr. Sailer is essentially Yankahing your chain. The professor’s position as a member of the Coalition of the Left Fringe Group is not a mainstream position. So tens of millions of us normies–white, black, brown, yellow, red–will go on with our lives, having friendships and relationships outside our racial and ethnic groups, scoffing at his notion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    The professor’s position as a member of the Coalition of the Left Fringe Group is not a mainstream position.

    You're right. The New York Times is a fringe newsletter, Xeroxed by hand in someone's office after hours, and mailed out to a few dozen extremists.

    So tens of millions of us normies–white, black, brown, yellow, red–will go on with our lives, having friendships and relationships outside our racial and ethnic groups, scoffing at his notion.


    Why? He's right. The white man is holding all the others down. This professor and his family should be repatriated back to Ghana, where his kids can live out their true potential, without having those mean ol' white folks interfere by giving them schooling and jobs and whatnot.
    , @Jack D
    Are you sure about that? Was the radical Left yanking our chain when they said that men should be allowed to marry men at a time when that was unimaginable or when they said that boys should be allowed to use the girls bathroom? Or were they the vanguard of the Revolution pushing the Overton window to the left? Herzl said, "If you will it, it is no dream."

    Wouldn't a remade world, one in which Prof. Yankah's mulatto children could and should withhold the honor of their friendship from pleading whites (Oh, please, Yankah, Jr., I am a goodwhite who abases myself before you. PLEEZE be my friend!") be a world that is more to his liking?
    , @Brutusale
    I shudder to think of what Corvy considers "normie" behaviors!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. ic1000 says:
    @Yan Shen
    I don't think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans. He mostly blames them for the woes afflicting black America and repeatedly urges white Americans to be more open about their supposed privilege and racism.

    Now I agree that all of this seems rather misguided. However, TNC's crime isn't so much that he's wrong, but that he obsesses over race constantly in an unproductive fashion. The fact that society fawns over him for doing so, as correctly observed in the quote above, really sticks in some people's craw. It's mind boggling how anyone could think that anything TNC has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight.

    John Derbyshire, while he may be narrowly speaking correct on the facts, turns off some people not because he's wrong or politically incorrect, but because some of us don't see the productive value in basically shouting endlessly from the top of your lungs, over and over again, to anyone within 100 miles willing to listen that on average blacks are less intelligent and more prone to violence compared to members of other ethnic groups. This doesn't seem like a particularly constructive way for blacks and whites to move forward, hand in hand, as Mr. Derbyshire often likes to say. Rather it seems like a great way to piss people off.

    A man of Mr. Derbyshire's intellect should be able to more smartly and constructively get his points across, in a way more likely to lead to tangible action.

    As I like to say, there are three things certain in this world, death, taxes, and Mr. Derbyshire warning us week after week after week after week about the Black Menace!

    > I don’t think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans.

    See CCZ’s quote of Coates’ interview with Ezra Klein at #127. Also see the concluding pages of “Between The World And Me,” excerpted here. Coates takes on the mantle of an Old Testament prophet to curse and damn white Americans.

    Coates wouldn’t go out of his way to inflict violence on me (or rape my daughter) as redress for the racial injustices of the past. Unlike some Black Panther comrades of his father, according to their own accounts. Is that because he lives by a higher moral code, or is it due to an intellectual’s squeamishness and cost/benefit analysis? Although I’ve read his books and essays, I can’t say.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. Astorian says:

    The comments in that Times column were predictable and yet hilariously pathetic (or pathetically hilarious). Most were variations on, “Wait, you can be MY friend! I’m not one of THOSE white people! I’m a Jewish commie pinko academic from New York! I voted for Jill Stein! You don’t hate ME, you hate all those Goyim in flyover country!”

    But of course, Professor Yankah knew exactly what he was saying! Look at his background: he has NEVER lived among “THOSE” white people (or among ANY black people, for that matter). He grew up a faculty brat in East Lansing. He spent his college years in Ann Arbor, Morningside Heights and Oxford! He lives and works in the East Village. In short, he has spent his entire life among white (primarily Jewish) left-wing intellectuals.

    He has never met a white Trump voter in his life and probably never will. By default, practically ALL of the “white” kids he won’t let his son play with are the sons and daughters of Jewish leftists who had deluded themselves that Yankah liked them!

    As Hannibal Lecter would say, we don’t seek out people to hate- we start by hating people we see around us every day. Yankah doesn’t hate Bubba in East Texas or Stan Kowalski in Western Pennsylvania- he hates the people he teaches and works with! But they try desperately to convince themselves he really hates a Heartland he’s never set foot in.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  220. unadorned says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    “You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice.”

    Sure, telling your son the truth will cause gross damage, yet the endless lies told to white kids from K thru college won’t do a bit of harm.

    FYI: Asians are the most racist people on the planet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. AndrewR says:
    @Art Deco
    which allows him to be easily misled by tribesmen like Kushner.

    Somehow Trump, one of six real estate developers in the United States who has been an abiding presence on the Forbes 400 since Jared Kushner was a toddler, is led around by the nose by his son-in-law (who, evidently, has neutralized Don Jr and Eric as well).

    Do yourself a favor: stop believing in magic Jews.

    Neither Don Jr. nor Eric strike me as terribly bright, and one of my greatest frustrations with their father is that he didn’t call out Eric’s comment that David Duke “deserves a bullet”, nor did he force Eric to retract that statement.

    Apparently you have a vested interest in mocking legitimate concerns about Jewish Supremacy and Privilege as being irrational fretting about “Magic Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. @Elmer T. Jones
    Would be funny to watch him and G.T. Coates interacting at a media cocktail party.

    They’d probably hate each other.
    “These are MY white folks!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. BB753 says:
    @anonymous
    A couple of observations. First, he is not black in the sense that he is a descendant of American slavery and segregation. He appears to be an immigrant, or son of an immigrant from Ghana. Yet he seems quick to identify as an American black. Rather than suffering through slavery like the ancestors of black Americans, this man' ancestors might have sold fellow Africans into slavery. And he has the gumption to bash whites!

    Second, if his wife is white, which I can't tell for sure, I'd like to hear his logic at squaring the circle on that given what he just wrote.

    His wife is white and I figure Jewish too. She must be very beautiful inside because the outside is not very flattering.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. @Art Deco
    John Derbyshire's wife is Chinese, not his father.

    . . . in the sense that President Obama is black (i.e. West African ancestors forcibly brought to America by way of the Middle Passage).

    Mr. Obama is indeed black by way of his wife and two children, the same way Mr. Derbyshire is Asian-American. Mr. Obama is certainly a Person of Color, but aside from his marriage, he is not black, and yes, that was certainly a factor in his slow start to a political career on Chicago’s South Side.

    Sheesh! A person can’t making a snarky remark around here without having to explain themselves?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  225. @Yan Shen
    Here's the deeper point to consider in all of this. White Americans basically fucked themselves and everyone else in this country over with their prior bad behavior. Even if you aren't someone who's particular worked up over the morality of slavery or Jim Crow or outright racism towards blacks that characterized much of say the pre 1960s history of America, from a practical perspective this prior history of bad behavior has basically forced all of us who came later in this country to be at the whim of black worship and anti-racism for basically the rest of eternity. In the same respect, the extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now we'll all have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till The End of Time.

    Which quite frankly really, really sucks. Who wants to hear society fawn over and over again about the supposed genius of Ta Nehisi Coates?

    Even worse, through the psychological phenomenon of projection and despite the fact that Asians have no real history of antagonism towards blacks in this country and in fact are often the victims of anti-black violence and prejudice, Asian Americans are often slandered as being supposedly racist towards blacks, when in fact much of the negative perception that Asians may harbor simply reflects what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality...

    Even worse, through the psychological phenomenon of projection and despite the fact that Asians have no real history of antagonism towards blacks in this country and in fact are often the victims of anti-black violence and prejudice, Asian Americans are often slandered as being supposedly racist towards blacks, when in fact much of the negative perception that Asians may harbor simply reflects what I’ve described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality…

    Are you seriously suggesting whites deserve the treatment they’ve suffered at the hands of blacks? Is that your position?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. @Yan Shen
    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would've been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't have to hear about how racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he's the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can't have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren't for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn't mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that's become par for the course for polite society...

    we can’t have any of that common sense good stuff because… way back in the day

    No. People in the present and very recent past are responsible for the present. We can’t have that common sense good stuff because of today’s left, not because of yesterday’s problems. There is nothing like path dependence controlling the coverage of race in the media. It’s the choices made every day by editors, academics, politicians, etc. They have the blame.

    My thesis is that if it weren’t for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn’t mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that’s become par for the course for polite society…

    This is really meaningless. If you didn’t spend so much time playing video games, you might be better able to distinguish between fantastical speculation and meaningful political commentary. The black problem goes so far back and is so tangled up with the history of the Americas that it’s impossible to imagine a world of “good behavior” that is anything like the modern world.

    Although you write long posts, most of your criticism and suggestions seem to come down to saying, “Stop being mean!” Yeah, okay.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  227. ChrisZ says:
    @Steve Sailer
    If Hankay Woke is a troll, he's a Long Con pro. I've been blogging about him since 2013:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-holy-war-against-pattern-recognition/

    Wasn’t it Voltaire who said: “If Woke N— Honkey-Yanker didn’t exist, we would have to invent him”?

    Thanks for your reply Steve. Such a long con is unlikely (was “Woke” even a thing in 2013?), so I guess my “Leftism beyond parody” conclusion applies.

    But I’d still like to see evidence of his existence that doesn’t come from an internet search.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  228. @Luke Lea
    Surprised NYT ran that. The message: "It's ok to be racist if you're black."

    Surprised NYT ran that.

    Please tell me you’re joking.

    The message: “It’s ok to be racist if you’re black.”

    No, that’s not the message.

    Racist doesn’t mean “someone who hates people of another race.”

    Racist means white, and neither the NYT nor the black author are saying, “It’s OK to be white if you’re black”, which is completely nonsensical.

    They’re saying white people are evil, and deserve to be hated.

    That’s not racism. That’s diversity and social justice.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  229. @Jason Roberts
    Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    At least he didn’t choose to call himself ACOWW.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  230. @Anonymous
    Most people choose not to go to Yeshiva University and associate with Prof. Yankah. Yeshiva University is a Jewish university with a mostly Jewish student body.

    It’s kind of complicated. Yeshiva and Cardozo law are kind of affiliated but Yeshiva is a religious school and Cardozo is adamantly not. Which gives rise to such controversies as this

    https://abovethelaw.com/2010/05/cardozo-law-school-fights-to-get-yeshiva-university-president-to-affirm-that-its-okay-to-be-gay/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  231. Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside.

    So, we are not all the same on the inside? Is this now the NYT position?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  232. @Anonymous

    Andrew’s entire schtick is being a contrarian eeyore blackpiller who is furious at Trump for not going full Pinochet on Nov 9th, 2016.
     
    The left is infuriating but it still doesn't deserve the Pinochet treatment.

    If the U.S. were a Latin American country, by now there would have been several assassination/coup attempts against Trump, against a backdrop of continual nationwide low-level violence against government supporters and officials. The U.S. isn't there yet.

    Wear a Trump Hat in Berkely and let me know how that works out for you.

    We are already there. For those of us paying attention, two churches have already been shot up by the Left, Rep. Scalise was nearly killed by a Bernie Bro, and Sen. Paul got a number of broken bones by his socialist neighbor.

    And that’s off the top of my head. You better start believing in civil wars, cause you’re in one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  233. @AndrewR
    Pinochet was far too sadistic for me to really admire him or want anyone to fully emulate him, but it's hard not to be black-pilled by Trump and his low-info True Believing disciples. Trump doesn't have much in the way of a coherent worldview or governing style, which allows him to be easily misled by tribesmen like Kushner. He is also unbelievably thin-skinned, which is obviously a dangerous trait for a leader.

    DJT must be viewed as merely a stepping-stone. It was refreshing to hear him break some political taboos during his campaign but that's about all he's been good for.

    Tell me more about the build up in your fan fiction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  234. “My bi-ethnic wife, my most trusted friend, understands she is seen as a white woman, even though her brother and father are not.”

    Does anyone have any idea what he means by this?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    I think he is saying that his wife, despite looking like a run of the mill Ashkenazi Jewess, is in fact an Octoroon with a father who has not crossed the color line and who is still perceived as a black mulatto. And that she has a [step? half?] brother who is likewise perceived as black - sometimes at the Octoroon level, the offspring will differ in color, with one child (his wife) appearing entirely white and the other (the brother) appearing more mulatto.

    This is sort of Sapir-Whorf in reverse - once upon a time in America we had a fine vocabulary with which to describe various racial categories (quadroon, octoroon, etc.) but now they have disappeared so you can no longer even understand what Wookie is try to tell you.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  235. @Twinkie

    going full Pinochet
     
    Free helicopter rides for SJWs and leftist activists!

    As Tiny Duck is parody of the hard Left, Andrew is a parody of a Richard Spencer big brain.
     
    That's funny.

    Theres a guy tweeting as General Pinochet and he makes a very valid point that the Left has been on a temper tantrum for the last 60 years, and has grown into a monster that eventually will have to be confronted. The best thing, in his words, would be a sudden swift hard confrontation now, to prevent the bloodbath that’s going to come.

    Unfortunately, in the great American tradition, we will kick the can down the road.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Old Palo Altan
    Exactly what I had been minded to say myself.

    And in reference to somebody else's post: Pinochet (the real one) was not "sadistic"- he was a hard-headed soldier who knew that you win battles by killing people. Once you've won, you settle back to ruling the country and, if any little bastard comes along who wants to start the war going again, well, then you kill him too.
    Pinochet did not persecute for the sake of persecuting. He surgically removed a cancer - and then set about healing the cancer's host. This he did so well that Chile, even after further years of Leftist misrule, is a model South American state.
    I did say to him the one time we met that he should have ignored the result of the election he lost in 1988. Those around the table looked shocked, even worried (perhaps for my health?) but the General merely shrugged - and then, smiling, offered me another cup of tea.

    , @Twinkie
    To be quite frank, I’ve been having Francoist fantasies more and more lately. People are electing “transgender” freaks - the country has gone nuts. This was not what I was promised when I came to this country in the early Reagan years. I was promised “It’s morning in America again” in return for my devotion and patriotism to the Republic and its people. I feel completely and totally betrayed. This was not why I lost friends and my own blood and flesh overseas.
    , @Brutusale
    The Civil Cold War turned Hot with Trump's nomination.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  236. @Yan Shen
    I don't think Coates wishes any ill will towards white Americans. He mostly blames them for the woes afflicting black America and repeatedly urges white Americans to be more open about their supposed privilege and racism.

    Now I agree that all of this seems rather misguided. However, TNC's crime isn't so much that he's wrong, but that he obsesses over race constantly in an unproductive fashion. The fact that society fawns over him for doing so, as correctly observed in the quote above, really sticks in some people's craw. It's mind boggling how anyone could think that anything TNC has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight.

    John Derbyshire, while he may be narrowly speaking correct on the facts, turns off some people not because he's wrong or politically incorrect, but because some of us don't see the productive value in basically shouting endlessly from the top of your lungs, over and over again, to anyone within 100 miles willing to listen that on average blacks are less intelligent and more prone to violence compared to members of other ethnic groups. This doesn't seem like a particularly constructive way for blacks and whites to move forward, hand in hand, as Mr. Derbyshire often likes to say. Rather it seems like a great way to piss people off.

    A man of Mr. Derbyshire's intellect should be able to more smartly and constructively get his points across, in a way more likely to lead to tangible action.

    As I like to say, there are three things certain in this world, death, taxes, and Mr. Derbyshire warning us week after week after week after week about the Black Menace!

    You talk a good game on high Asian M, but you’ve never backed up your claims about Derbyshire quantitatively.

    Here’s a claim for you:
    “After removing commentary that focuses on the left’s race-hustling (i.e., all commentary that wouldn’t exist if not for the left’s obsession with race), Derbyshire’s paragraphs that focus on blacks constitute less than 10% of his output by word count.”

    I’ll even grant you to start measuring after his defenestration by NR (thus ignoring the vast quantity of his archived writing which you have admitted to not reading).

    If you can’t falsify my claim and if you are an honest person, you’ll stop your mistaken and, frankly, quite stupid comparison of Derb and TNC.

    Are you up to the challenge? Think of it as a quest, like Legend of Dilda or whatever you play.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  237. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "So, we’re fundamentally agreed, then? Professor, it’s about cotton-pickin’ time. Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?"

    Mr. Sailer is essentially Yankahing your chain. The professor's position as a member of the Coalition of the Left Fringe Group is not a mainstream position. So tens of millions of us normies--white, black, brown, yellow, red--will go on with our lives, having friendships and relationships outside our racial and ethnic groups, scoffing at his notion.

    The professor’s position as a member of the Coalition of the Left Fringe Group is not a mainstream position.

    You’re right. The New York Times is a fringe newsletter, Xeroxed by hand in someone’s office after hours, and mailed out to a few dozen extremists.

    So tens of millions of us normies–white, black, brown, yellow, red–will go on with our lives, having friendships and relationships outside our racial and ethnic groups, scoffing at his notion.

    Why? He’s right. The white man is holding all the others down. This professor and his family should be repatriated back to Ghana, where his kids can live out their true potential, without having those mean ol’ white folks interfere by giving them schooling and jobs and whatnot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    If Corvinus wasn't full of s**t, he'd just be an empty sack that would blow away in the wind.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  238. helena says:
    @anonymous
    A couple of observations. First, he is not black in the sense that he is a descendant of American slavery and segregation. He appears to be an immigrant, or son of an immigrant from Ghana. Yet he seems quick to identify as an American black. Rather than suffering through slavery like the ancestors of black Americans, this man' ancestors might have sold fellow Africans into slavery. And he has the gumption to bash whites!

    Second, if his wife is white, which I can't tell for sure, I'd like to hear his logic at squaring the circle on that given what he just wrote.

    exactly why the continued use of colours is an own goal for the right. stick to African, African-American, West Indian, British West Indian – those categories are culturally meaningful and using them will take the wind out of the sails of political correctness, simply by injecting a gleam of reality into discourse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  239. anon says: • Disclaimer

    What’s strange is, you don’t have to teach white kids anything about black people, they just have to be around them. But propaganda and coercion make them think they are the same people, it’s gradually working against their own instincts of bad and good, right and wrong. Can white people today even find black unattractive or is that racist? Did guilt make that women marry him? Did fear of saying no to him maker her marry him? Are whites allowed to go eeeeewwww?
    When your blacks friend is in a group of his/her black buddies are you feeling a bit to the side, chided more about your whiteness and guilt against the world, the slavery you caused. Feel like you want to take up their cause against yourself and your own family if need be to be one of them?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  240. Thirdtwin says:
    @L Woods
    I suppose they're angling for a one-way segregation in which they receive an increasing litany of set asides and sinecures, while still retaining access to desirable white spaces and (likely most of all) white women. And yes, it goes without saying who will be paying for all of this.

    “I suppose they’re angling for a one-way segregation in which they receive an increasing litany of set asides and sinecures…”

    IOW, it’s a Reparations Cargo Cult.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  241. Jack D says:
    @larry lurker
    I don't really speak Chinese but I was able to figure out enough of the characters using Google Translate's drawing input feature to find the full text:

    Left text: 中国人民不可辱 = The Chinese people cannot be humiliated/insulted/abused

    Right text: 世界人民不可欺 = The people of the world cannot be bullied/cheated/taken advantage of

    The fist: 第三世界 = The Third World

    Googling the complete text, I found two things. The first was a picture of an African woman at a market looking at the same poster. Caption (auto-translated): "It seems that such 'red' posters are no stranger to people in third world countries."

    The second was a full view of the poster on Instagram where we can finally see what the Third World fist is landing on: two aggressively white men in suits, both of whom appear to be bleeding out of their heads. (Or maybe that's just supposed to represent the impact of their heads hitting the ground...)

    The two bleeding white guys at the bottom are US imperialism 美帝 and Soviet revisionism 苏修 who are both being smashed by the red fist of 3rd world (including China).

    I assume the prof or his wife have the poster up in their home or office in a supposedly cool or ironic way but it’s actually very telling as to their true wishes. Would they put up a Nazi poster showing bleeding Jews and Bolsheviks being smashed by an Aryan fist in a cool or ironic way?

    The Left is all about projection – when he says that he is worried about white people physically hurting his children, it’s because he knows that if the situation was reversed (e.g. Zimbabwe) then white children would be in physical danger from blacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @larry lurker

    The two bleeding white guys at the bottom are US imperialism 美帝 and Soviet revisionism 苏修 who are both being smashed by the red fist of 3rd world (including China).
     
    Nice, thanks. Glad I got their races right - I wasn't 100% sure about the fellow on the left.

    Also, it didn't occur to me that China (or certain Chinese) would have ever considered itself part of the third world (it was drilled into my head at some point that communist countries were "Second World"), so the poster makes a lot more sense now.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  242. Listen, everybody needs love. I would like to personally thank Woke Hankey for taking this grizzled hag off our hands and providing her a nice home and a husband with a prestigious sinecure at Yeshivah.

    Okay, probably not what her parents pictured when they imagined their daughter marrying a Yeshivah professor, but hey- think about all the middle-aged, unmarried black women seething at this photo of yet another Becky stealing a quality, high-IQ, bisexual Strong Black Man.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I would like to personally thank Woke Hankey for taking this grizzled hag off our hands and providing her a nice home and a husband with a prestigious sinecure at Yeshivah."

    Is that what the parents of your old lady said to you?

    "think about all the middle-aged, unmarried black women seething at this photo of yet another Becky stealing a quality, high-IQ, bisexual Strong Black Man."

    So? That's their problem. And as far as this notion of someone who says it's "stealing" when one race marries someone from another race, again, that's idiotic.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  243. Black people were free in Europe and England plus some Northern and North Eastern states before the civil war. So the idea that whites didn’t treat blacks good enough after the war is A BIG FAT LIE. The KKK came about after the civil war, you can find the reason yourself. Also after the civil war blacks could vote, there were schools set up and they were elected to political office. Do some people get any more ignorant than those who post. Blacks were not forced to fight like the white man, I wonder why Jim Crow happened?
    Do you ever feel like your life is to be spent trying to make people of color better people, like that it’s your purpose in life? That’s propaganda.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    The KKK came about after the civil war, you can find the reason yourself.

    What was the reason?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  244. Jack D says:
    @Corvinus
    "So, we’re fundamentally agreed, then? Professor, it’s about cotton-pickin’ time. Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?"

    Mr. Sailer is essentially Yankahing your chain. The professor's position as a member of the Coalition of the Left Fringe Group is not a mainstream position. So tens of millions of us normies--white, black, brown, yellow, red--will go on with our lives, having friendships and relationships outside our racial and ethnic groups, scoffing at his notion.

    Are you sure about that? Was the radical Left yanking our chain when they said that men should be allowed to marry men at a time when that was unimaginable or when they said that boys should be allowed to use the girls bathroom? Or were they the vanguard of the Revolution pushing the Overton window to the left? Herzl said, “If you will it, it is no dream.”

    Wouldn’t a remade world, one in which Prof. Yankah’s mulatto children could and should withhold the honor of their friendship from pleading whites (Oh, please, Yankah, Jr., I am a goodwhite who abases myself before you. PLEEZE be my friend!”) be a world that is more to his liking?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Was the radical Left yanking our chain when they said that men should be allowed to marry men at a time when that was unimaginable or when they said that boys should be allowed to use the girls bathroom?"

    Certainly gay marriage and transgender rights originated with groups of people who held opinions contrary to established, conventional thinking. But social revolutions are a historical phenomenon, and once taboo subjects and topics may eventually become mainstream. Think about segregation for a moment--Southrons had passed laws separately whites and blacks politically and socially. Interracial marriage was considered illegal and unethical. Within a couple of generations, this "unnatural" interaction is now generally accepted by Americans.

    "Wouldn’t a remade world, one in which Prof. Yankah’s mulatto children could and should withhold the honor of their friendship from pleading whites (Oh, please, Yankah, Jr., I am a goodwhite who abases myself before you. PLEEZE be my friend!”) be a world that is more to his liking?"

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  245. eah says:
    @eah
    Lol.....about 4hrs apart

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOdtqiuUIAE7ieD.jpg

    Per whitepages.com, Mr Ekow N Yankah (how many of them could there be?) lives at 29 Perry St in NYC — this is Greenwich Village — per the demographic pie chart below, he’s going to have a few problems keeping his kids away from white kids.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie
    It’d be so funny if it weren’t so sad.
    , @benjaminl
    Well, in fairness to Mr. Yankah, New York City is such an overwhelmingly -- dare I say, unbearably? -- white place, that it must have been difficult for him to find a single neighborhood there that *wasn't* overflowing with white people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  246. Ragno says:

    Against our gauzy national hopes, I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with white people is possible.

    Just as I make sure to teach them to always live as closely to them as possible. 24-hour liquor stores may be convenient, and frequent gun-battles in the street may be exciting, but I prefer that my boys experience life with one lock on the door, rather than five or six. Plus a deadbolt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  247. BenKenobi says:
    @Bill P
    The American left is indeed Maoist. That's a very racially aggressive poster. Why not turn that racial aggression on its main proponents: the white billionaires who run this country, and those in California in particular?

    We deplorables are a hard, meagre target. Well-armed, impecunious and irredeemable (according to the left). We also might not care if POC seize some beachside estates in Malibu and Marin County.

    If we were really deplorable, what we'd do is agitate the Maoists into a frenzy in their breeding grounds, and turn them loose on their wealthy, liberal neighbors.

    Morally, that sounds pretty bad, but one of these days some of our people are going to start asking "why not?" If the elites really hate us so much, then who are our real enemies? The aimless brown masses or their duplicitous would-be masters who want to use them to crush us? I think we're starting to figure out the answer to that.

    This guy gets it.

    Fourth generation memetic warfare. The diverse hordes are weaponized, but they are not under any formal command. The sword can cut both ways.

    What’s to stop an interested party raising PoC flash mobs via social media?

    “YOU HAVE RESEARCHED NEGRO STORM.”

    Read More
    • LOL: Jack Hanson
    • Replies: @El Dato

    “YOU HAVE RESEARCHED NEGRO STORM.”
     
    I see a market in a PC Master Race game wherein a society of disparate individuals can be manipulated via various channels to react in a targeted way. Current events can be seamlessly woven in. Much fun and learning can be had. One could call it "uncivilization".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  248. Ragno says:
    @Yan Shen
    And really, how hard could it have been? If white Americans had just treated blacks in this country, at least say post-slavery, as fellow citizens and human beings, instead of in a thoroughly discriminatory fashion, then the successes or failures of blacks in this country would've been upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't have to hear about how racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today.

    Nor would we have to hear nauseatingly sickening sycophants endlessly fawn over and fete people like Ta Nehisi Coates like he's the second coming of Jesus Christ. And when blacks are viciously assaulting Asians in Northern California, the media would actually talk about it honestly.

    But yeah, we can't have any of that common sense good stuff because whites basically had to discriminate against blacks way back in the day, instead of just being decent human beings to their fellow Americans. My thesis is that if it weren't for this prior bad behavior, the contours of our national discourse on race would be much different today and almost certainly we wouldn't mindlessly worship much of the prevailing PC dogma that's become par for the course for polite society...

    Dear Yan Shen:

    Let the inimitable HBD researcher, M.G. Miles, explain how things work. I hope you’re paying attention.

    On Planet Earth, Afro crime is high. Period. It is high in their homeland, Africa. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were colonizers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were not colonizers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were slavers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were not slavers. It is high nearly everywhere they are found on this third rock from the sun. Idang Alibi, a Nigerian journalist, states it plainly:

    Anywhere in the world today where you have a concentration of black people among other races, the poorest, the least educated, the least achieving, and the most violent group among those races will be the blacks. When indices of underdevelopment are given, black people and countries are sure to occupy the bottom of the ladder.

    God himself must be frustrated with his black children. They must be an embarrassment to him. He has given us everything he has given to other of his children; why are his black children not manifesting their own gift?

    Afro crime is very high relative to other groups. This is why we profile.

    Find the original article here: http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.fr/2013/08/why-we-profile.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  249. @Jason Roberts
    Ekow can’t be her real name. That’s “woke” spelled backwards.

    I think you’re right; If this one’s not a troll then she’s doing a damned good impression. But could there be any more evidence in the name that this is all just one colossal joke? Maybe we can play around with the last name too and see what we get: “Yankah.” Say it fast and I suppose one could mistake that for “Yankee” so there they are also getting in a hit at the home country too, for good measure. Or perhaps we could spell it backwards like we did the first name and get . . . . “haknay.” Which actually sounds suspiciously close to “hackney,” and possibly meaning that they could be using the name to tell us that not only is this one massive con job, it’s also one that they’re not even going to work particularly hard at since they know they can rely on the pathological altruism of rich and gullible white folks to carry them across the finish line.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  250. MarcB. says:

    The New Left are high on their own supply if they think this kind of talk won’t spark a re-evaluation among fellow travelers of the more numerous Nominal Left, many whom have not realized until they’ve sided up with until it’s made explicit in articles like this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    Yes and no. Many in what you call the Nominal Left will either not read this, or skim it and think meh whatever and then flip to the sports or financial section, or flip on CNN to see the latest about who Roy Moore sexually assaulted.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  251. Tiny Duck says:

    The editorial breaks my heart because if I were in his shoes, I would very likely be saying the same things. I am a white man and it would be easy for me to say that he is committing the same sin that he is preaching against, but that would be wrong.

    Millions of whites voted for Trump and his despicable policies and values.

    The author would have every reason to disbelieve me if I told you that one of my proudest moments in the last year was when an African American member of my church said that I actually got what white privilege was about and that he was proud to call me brother.

    I can’t challenge him to not stereotype white people and to not teach your children to do this because the risk of giving someone of my background the benefit of the doubt is borne entirely by him and his children. All I can ask is that he realize there are white people as sickened by Trump and his voters as you are and that they are trying to be worthy of his trust.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    You a pathetic and should be b*tch-slapped for being ashamed to be white!
    , @martin2
    Mr Duck is getting lazy and has copied this from the NYT website. But I was going to say...I looked at the comments at the NYT and could not believe the cringey apologetic BS coming from people that are presumably white and are actually agreeing with this black professor and saying how sorry they were for him and how sympathetic they were. But its all absolute crap! Blacks are far more violent than whites. Blacks commit far more crimes against whites than whites commit against blacks. The real denial is the left’s denial of the obvious, observable low IQs of blacks.

    In EVERY instance where blacks are in great numbers, control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we ALWAYS see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive, unable to support their own children, birthrates
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found

    What is wrong with these white people? How can white people be so f'ing pathetic! How can they be so so f'ing stupid? They are mad, literally insane. Its like they have edopted some crazy religious cult that says that aliens will be arriving on Xmas day.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  252. Looks like the Professor married Edith Prickley from SCTV

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  253. Can My Children Be Friends With White People? –Ewok

    Daddy, Can I Have Sex With White Girls? –Ewok, Jr.

    Read More
    • LOL: Brutusale
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  254. “Yankah” spelled backwards is almost “hackneyed”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  255. Corvinus says:
    @Jack D
    Are you sure about that? Was the radical Left yanking our chain when they said that men should be allowed to marry men at a time when that was unimaginable or when they said that boys should be allowed to use the girls bathroom? Or were they the vanguard of the Revolution pushing the Overton window to the left? Herzl said, "If you will it, it is no dream."

    Wouldn't a remade world, one in which Prof. Yankah's mulatto children could and should withhold the honor of their friendship from pleading whites (Oh, please, Yankah, Jr., I am a goodwhite who abases myself before you. PLEEZE be my friend!") be a world that is more to his liking?

    “Was the radical Left yanking our chain when they said that men should be allowed to marry men at a time when that was unimaginable or when they said that boys should be allowed to use the girls bathroom?”

    Certainly gay marriage and transgender rights originated with groups of people who held opinions contrary to established, conventional thinking. But social revolutions are a historical phenomenon, and once taboo subjects and topics may eventually become mainstream. Think about segregation for a moment–Southrons had passed laws separately whites and blacks politically and socially. Interracial marriage was considered illegal and unethical. Within a couple of generations, this “unnatural” interaction is now generally accepted by Americans.

    “Wouldn’t a remade world, one in which Prof. Yankah’s mulatto children could and should withhold the honor of their friendship from pleading whites (Oh, please, Yankah, Jr., I am a goodwhite who abases myself before you. PLEEZE be my friend!”) be a world that is more to his liking?”

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.

    Well, not even his liking, really. I mean, he says he wants to be away from white people, but he's just blowing off steam. If he wanted to be away from us, he'd m0ve back to Africa.

    The thing to keep in mind when dealing with blacks like Yankah here is that they're basically like teenagers. They don't like having to live under the white man's rules (such as "Do not hit a Hispanic guy's head against the sidewalk."), but they also know that they can't really get very far without us.

    So we just have to put up with a lot of obnoxious whining from them about how one day they're going to move out of the house and THEN we'll see!

    I guess that's our privilege, that we have to put up with that.
    , @Jack D

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.
     
    You could have said the exact same thing about a gay activist's views on gay marriage in say 1996, when 2 out of 3 Americans did not agree with THAT worldview:

    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2013/03/26/us/politics/fivethirtyeight-0326-marriage2/fivethirtyeight-0326-marriage2-blog480.png

    But today the gay activist's view is the majority view so who is to say that 20 years from now the majority won't agree with the good professor and not with your rose colored kumbaya view of race relations?
    , @Olorin

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.
     
    It would appear that you are deliciously innocent of the rapidity with which marginal and extreme views of What's Best For Society can be engineered into its members for the benefit of its engineers and exploiters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  256. Corvinus says:
    @Ghost of Bull Moose
    Listen, everybody needs love. I would like to personally thank Woke Hankey for taking this grizzled hag off our hands and providing her a nice home and a husband with a prestigious sinecure at Yeshivah.

    Okay, probably not what her parents pictured when they imagined their daughter marrying a Yeshivah professor, but hey- think about all the middle-aged, unmarried black women seething at this photo of yet another Becky stealing a quality, high-IQ, bisexual Strong Black Man.

    “I would like to personally thank Woke Hankey for taking this grizzled hag off our hands and providing her a nice home and a husband with a prestigious sinecure at Yeshivah.”

    Is that what the parents of your old lady said to you?

    “think about all the middle-aged, unmarried black women seething at this photo of yet another Becky stealing a quality, high-IQ, bisexual Strong Black Man.”

    So? That’s their problem. And as far as this notion of someone who says it’s “stealing” when one race marries someone from another race, again, that’s idiotic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose
    "Is that what the parents of your old lady said to you?"

    No. They may have, I don't know. They don't speak English.

    "So? That’s their problem. And as far as this notion of someone who says it’s “stealing” when one race marries someone from another race, again, that’s idiotic."

    You don't know any black women. I agree with you, it's not stealing when they 're giving it away. My guess is Woke Hanky belongs to the same club as Buddy Fletcher and Charles Blow. In case you don't know any black men either, it's A Thing.

    Just like Woke Hanky's seashell necklace, there's no accounting for taste in fashion accessories.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  257. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t.

    Asians in America are for the most part economic tourists with shallow roots here. They don’t have the same view or stake in this society as the whites who brought this civilization to the new world, or the blacks whose ancestors were treated harshly.

    However, Asians in Asia seem perfectly able to grasp racial questions when their societies face threats. In 1988, Chinese students who were offended by African men dating Chinese women began the Nanjing anti-African protests. Though not as famous in the West as the Tiananmen Square protests 6 months later, these protests that began out of anger at the presence of African students in China helped spur other protests which culminated in Tiananmen Square.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  258. Must comment on the odd photo. Look at his expression, and head posture. I can’t tell if he’s proud of that skank or sort of ashamed. She, on the other hand, looks like she could not be prouder. I wonder if when they are out together, and he gets the stink-eye from black women, he says what Richard Pryor used to joke: “She’s not with me!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  259. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @guest
    I think the idea is we get there first. You know, before the whole left starts acting like its feral vibrant shock troops.

    Which won't happen.

    You really don’t want to bring Latin American-style political violence to the U.S., but if it must come you must make sure the left is seen to fire the first shot.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  260. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "Was the radical Left yanking our chain when they said that men should be allowed to marry men at a time when that was unimaginable or when they said that boys should be allowed to use the girls bathroom?"

    Certainly gay marriage and transgender rights originated with groups of people who held opinions contrary to established, conventional thinking. But social revolutions are a historical phenomenon, and once taboo subjects and topics may eventually become mainstream. Think about segregation for a moment--Southrons had passed laws separately whites and blacks politically and socially. Interracial marriage was considered illegal and unethical. Within a couple of generations, this "unnatural" interaction is now generally accepted by Americans.

    "Wouldn’t a remade world, one in which Prof. Yankah’s mulatto children could and should withhold the honor of their friendship from pleading whites (Oh, please, Yankah, Jr., I am a goodwhite who abases myself before you. PLEEZE be my friend!”) be a world that is more to his liking?"

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.

    Well, not even his liking, really. I mean, he says he wants to be away from white people, but he’s just blowing off steam. If he wanted to be away from us, he’d m0ve back to Africa.

    The thing to keep in mind when dealing with blacks like Yankah here is that they’re basically like teenagers. They don’t like having to live under the white man’s rules (such as “Do not hit a Hispanic guy’s head against the sidewalk.”), but they also know that they can’t really get very far without us.

    So we just have to put up with a lot of obnoxious whining from them about how one day they’re going to move out of the house and THEN we’ll see!

    I guess that’s our privilege, that we have to put up with that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  261. Jack D says:
    @Corvinus
    "Was the radical Left yanking our chain when they said that men should be allowed to marry men at a time when that was unimaginable or when they said that boys should be allowed to use the girls bathroom?"

    Certainly gay marriage and transgender rights originated with groups of people who held opinions contrary to established, conventional thinking. But social revolutions are a historical phenomenon, and once taboo subjects and topics may eventually become mainstream. Think about segregation for a moment--Southrons had passed laws separately whites and blacks politically and socially. Interracial marriage was considered illegal and unethical. Within a couple of generations, this "unnatural" interaction is now generally accepted by Americans.

    "Wouldn’t a remade world, one in which Prof. Yankah’s mulatto children could and should withhold the honor of their friendship from pleading whites (Oh, please, Yankah, Jr., I am a goodwhite who abases myself before you. PLEEZE be my friend!”) be a world that is more to his liking?"

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.

    You could have said the exact same thing about a gay activist’s views on gay marriage in say 1996, when 2 out of 3 Americans did not agree with THAT worldview:

    But today the gay activist’s view is the majority view so who is to say that 20 years from now the majority won’t agree with the good professor and not with your rose colored kumbaya view of race relations?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  262. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anon
    I get so confused about whether Jews are "white" and whether Yankah, a prof at Yeshiva, is in a way talking about Jews.

    Jews are the bride at every wedding, and the corpse at every funeral.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  263. @Corvinus
    "I would like to personally thank Woke Hankey for taking this grizzled hag off our hands and providing her a nice home and a husband with a prestigious sinecure at Yeshivah."

    Is that what the parents of your old lady said to you?

    "think about all the middle-aged, unmarried black women seething at this photo of yet another Becky stealing a quality, high-IQ, bisexual Strong Black Man."

    So? That's their problem. And as far as this notion of someone who says it's "stealing" when one race marries someone from another race, again, that's idiotic.

    “Is that what the parents of your old lady said to you?”

    No. They may have, I don’t know. They don’t speak English.

    “So? That’s their problem. And as far as this notion of someone who says it’s “stealing” when one race marries someone from another race, again, that’s idiotic.”

    You don’t know any black women. I agree with you, it’s not stealing when they ‘re giving it away. My guess is Woke Hanky belongs to the same club as Buddy Fletcher and Charles Blow. In case you don’t know any black men either, it’s A Thing.

    Just like Woke Hanky’s seashell necklace, there’s no accounting for taste in fashion accessories.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  264. Olorin says:

    rending, violent, often fatal betrayal.

    We are approaching the (((retconning singularity))) methinks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  265. Olorin says:
    @Corvinus
    "Was the radical Left yanking our chain when they said that men should be allowed to marry men at a time when that was unimaginable or when they said that boys should be allowed to use the girls bathroom?"

    Certainly gay marriage and transgender rights originated with groups of people who held opinions contrary to established, conventional thinking. But social revolutions are a historical phenomenon, and once taboo subjects and topics may eventually become mainstream. Think about segregation for a moment--Southrons had passed laws separately whites and blacks politically and socially. Interracial marriage was considered illegal and unethical. Within a couple of generations, this "unnatural" interaction is now generally accepted by Americans.

    "Wouldn’t a remade world, one in which Prof. Yankah’s mulatto children could and should withhold the honor of their friendship from pleading whites (Oh, please, Yankah, Jr., I am a goodwhite who abases myself before you. PLEEZE be my friend!”) be a world that is more to his liking?"

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.

    It would appear that you are deliciously innocent of the rapidity with which marginal and extreme views of What’s Best For Society can be engineered into its members for the benefit of its engineers and exploiters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "It would appear that you are deliciously innocent of the rapidity with which marginal and extreme views of What’s Best For Society can be engineered into its members for the benefit of its engineers and exploiters."

    You realize that would include race realism, the Zeroth Amendment, and a host of other Alt Right causes.

    They all have to go back.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  266. Bee7 says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, ….

    Surely you have heard of Suey Park.

    Also:

    https://www.thoughtco.com/asian-american-civil-rights-movement-history-2834596

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  267. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Tiny Duck
    The editorial breaks my heart because if I were in his shoes, I would very likely be saying the same things. I am a white man and it would be easy for me to say that he is committing the same sin that he is preaching against, but that would be wrong.

    Millions of whites voted for Trump and his despicable policies and values.

    The author would have every reason to disbelieve me if I told you that one of my proudest moments in the last year was when an African American member of my church said that I actually got what white privilege was about and that he was proud to call me brother.

    I can't challenge him to not stereotype white people and to not teach your children to do this because the risk of giving someone of my background the benefit of the doubt is borne entirely by him and his children. All I can ask is that he realize there are white people as sickened by Trump and his voters as you are and that they are trying to be worthy of his trust.

    You a pathetic and should be b*tch-slapped for being ashamed to be white!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Christian

    You a pathetic and should be b*tch-slapped for being ashamed to be white!
     
    I'm ashamed Tiny Dick is White too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  268. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Twinkie
    Goan Catholics are a minuscule minority in India.

    But not all Catholics in India are Goanese.

    Okay, the rest are a small minority too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  269. Thomm says:
    @Yan Shen
    Well I don't know if I would necessarily agree with your comments about WNs having blue hair or the IQ of blacks or whatever else it is that you often like to point out, but I will uh agree that the vast majority of blacks are obsessed with race, a minority of whites are thoroughly obsessed with race, and there are some pretty strange and creepy fellows in the WN blogosphere who seem to be blithely unaware of their own creepiness.

    Well I don’t know if I would necessarily agree with your comments about WNs having blue hair

    I never, ever said that WNs have blue hair.

    I said that bottom-tier white women become ‘feminists’ and then dye their hair blue.

    The male equivalents in this bottom tier become WNs, and are similarly damaged and low-status.

    The rest of your comment is correct.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  270. Thomm says:
    @Karl
    91 Thomm > South Asians [...] don’t convert to Christianity


    i'll mention your theory to all the Catholics (as in "Roman") in Goa.

    Tell your son serving in ComFifthFleet, to check out the Goan maids in the RC church in town.

    If your son is a 7 who could land a 7 white bride, he'll be able to land a 8-9 Goan Catholic girl.

    As pleasant as a provinciana filipina, but with a 5-10 IQ point advantage.


    Not many of those Goan women would even dream of breeding with a dindu, which is more than we can say about (e.g.) Nordic women.

    Christians are 2% of India’s population.

    Extremely few take on Western first names, or convert to Christianity, upon arrival in the West.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  271. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Twinkie

    I would argue that the present is tribalism. It’s merely a matter of some deluded people that think it doesn’t apply to them.
     
    The problem here is one of definition. How does one define tribe? It's not clear that it simply means race. There are a lot of factors that enter into "tribe" in the U.S., race, ethnicity, class, education level, social standing, regional origin, etc. just to name a few.

    Christianity, particularly the RCC, experiences a degree of active persecution in China, which affects to some extent both its growth and the estimates thereof.

    How do old California (east) Asians vs. anticommunist refugees and their progeny vs. H1b guys (several other groups exist of course) vote?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  272. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Twinkie
    Goan Catholics are a minuscule minority in India.

    Sailing the Indian Ocean seems anecdotally for whatever reason to be a disproportionately Catholic profession.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  273. I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with white people is possible. When they ask, I will teach my sons that their beautiful hue is a fault line. Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside. I first have to keep my boys safe, and so I will teach them before the world shows them this particular brand of rending, violent, often fatal betrayal.

    If that’s the prevailing view of Blacks, oughtn’t we just move on to a shooting war? Oh yeah, we already are.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  274. @Anon
    You a pathetic and should be b*tch-slapped for being ashamed to be white!

    You a pathetic and should be b*tch-slapped for being ashamed to be white!

    I’m ashamed Tiny Dick is White too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  275. Let me guess, the mudshark in the picture is…let me see…Jewish? She looks like a slaggy, sluttier version of Joan Byez when she was first coming out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  276. @Yan Shen
    One of the best quotes I've read about John Derbyshire.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren't. I can't think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Here's an off topic interesting story that doesn't involve race, but might be good material for a blog such as this. I've recently bought a Nintendo Switch and started playing through Super Mario Odyssey...

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/12/asia/future-japan-videogame-landmarks/index.html


    Japan didn't invent the first computer game. That accolade goes to "Space War!", a game created in 1962 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

    But ever since then, Japan has embraced gaming culture with an almost unrivaled passion. From the Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog games that became cultural giants, to the Sega Mega Drive and Game Boy consoles which were symbols of their time, gaming was led by Tokyo for decades.

    "Without the contributions of Japan, we wouldn't have a video game industry," Blake J. Harris, a video game expert and author of "Console Wars," says. "Or, at least, not one that resembles what we have today in any way.

    "From hardware to software, controllers to culture, no country has had a bigger influence on console gaming."
     

    The more relevant question is why blacks and whites in this country seem so singularly obsessed with the topic of race, in a way that Asian Americans aren’t. I can’t think of a single Asian American equivalent to someone like John Derbyshire, Ta Nehisi Coates, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer, Al Sharpton, or any of the countless other black or white pundits for whom race is clearly a primary focus and the prism through which they view everything in life.

    Wesley Yang seems to be the man you’ve been missing. I think he’s the only semi-famous guy who’s doing this sort of thing in front of a wide audience. My impression is that Asians who view everything through a racial lens and write about it online are disproportionately women with non-Chinese Vietnamese surnames.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  277. @Jack Hanson
    Theres a guy tweeting as General Pinochet and he makes a very valid point that the Left has been on a temper tantrum for the last 60 years, and has grown into a monster that eventually will have to be confronted. The best thing, in his words, would be a sudden swift hard confrontation now, to prevent the bloodbath that's going to come.

    Unfortunately, in the great American tradition, we will kick the can down the road.

    Exactly what I had been minded to say myself.

    And in reference to somebody else’s post: Pinochet (the real one) was not “sadistic”- he was a hard-headed soldier who knew that you win battles by killing people. Once you’ve won, you settle back to ruling the country and, if any little bastard comes along who wants to start the war going again, well, then you kill him too.
    Pinochet did not persecute for the sake of persecuting. He surgically removed a cancer – and then set about healing the cancer’s host. This he did so well that Chile, even after further years of Leftist misrule, is a model South American state.
    I did say to him the one time we met that he should have ignored the result of the election he lost in 1988. Those around the table looked shocked, even worried (perhaps for my health?) but the General merely shrugged – and then, smiling, offered me another cup of tea.

    Read More
    • Agree: Jack Hanson
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    People who hand wring about how Pinochet got his results are not serious people.

    Sorry Boomer Bros - Citizenism is a pipe dream and your snarky tldr essays on how the guy who wrote Mad Men is anti White aren't going to convince the people currently getting away with attacking Trump supporters of anything other than that you DESERVE for your face to keep hitting their boot.

    The only decisive end to this insanity is going to be when the people wearing pussy hats and throwing paint thinner on Blair White are terrified of standing before a Deploreable Tribunal and facing summary justice.

    We got this way because the supposed Very Serious People on the Right kept telling flyover America that the Left "really wasn't serious" about homo marriage/tranny bathrooms/pedophilia/amnesty/etc.

    The reality is even a big brain boomer like Steve Sailer can't admit that the Left wants your guns so they can gulag you and kill you at will, but instead invents this inane conspiracy theory about how urban whites just want to keep Raven and Skyler safe from minorities with guns.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  278. Jack D says:
    @Malcolm X-Lax

    "My bi-ethnic wife, my most trusted friend, understands she is seen as a white woman, even though her brother and father are not."
     
    Does anyone have any idea what he means by this?

    I think he is saying that his wife, despite looking like a run of the mill Ashkenazi Jewess, is in fact an Octoroon with a father who has not crossed the color line and who is still perceived as a black mulatto. And that she has a [step? half?] brother who is likewise perceived as black – sometimes at the Octoroon level, the offspring will differ in color, with one child (his wife) appearing entirely white and the other (the brother) appearing more mulatto.

    This is sort of Sapir-Whorf in reverse – once upon a time in America we had a fine vocabulary with which to describe various racial categories (quadroon, octoroon, etc.) but now they have disappeared so you can no longer even understand what Wookie is try to tell you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Christian

    This is sort of Sapir-Whorf in reverse – once upon a time in America we had a fine vocabulary with which to describe various racial categories (quadroon, octoroon, etc.)
     
    Fair enough, good take, but that was once upon a time when they were fashioning various degrees of "Black" so they could pass for White because that was where the privilege was. Now that the privilege is with Blacks, Jews and Hispanics, everyone is content with the "One Drop" option, or in the case of wannabe Jews, a simple conversion and a distant maternal connection is good enough. Find a kinky hair, one drop of "heritage" in your past, you can declare Black now, for cash and prizes. This is why trannies convert man-2-woman at a ratio of around 6 or 8:1 over women-2-man. Privilege, although none is lost to women who declare "male". This is simply because even a tranny, a disfigured, castrated and mutilated tranny at that, knows that "castrated female" is a better gig than being a standard-issue everyday man, for their purposes anyway. And be assured, even the chicks that turn to being "men" will make sure everyone knows they started out as "women" so as not to sacrifice even THAT privilege. Of course, these days, "tranny" brings its own privilege. Funny thing, Privilege. It's a powerful incentive. Instant preference for all sorts of cash and prizes and on top of it, the ability to terrorize those around you at work and social settings.

    Amazing to me that women would allow tranny-men to appropriate female privilege, however. Initial feminist "approval", a change from their original position (faggots were their status with feminists back in the 60s and 70s), that was only because "tranny" was something they could beat heterosexual White men over the head with. Time goes on, we'll see more and more ugly-ass loser men take the plunge into "womanhood". Because then they can step up to the plate for their heaping, steamy helping of female privilege, goodies they could never have acquired as men. Only when women, having their scholarships and golf tournaments taken away by man-2-woman trannies and having to compete with trannies in other venues such as jobs and tenure and so on will women begin to chafe at the tranny explosion edging into their privilege. That day is coming because real bio-women are greedy scorekeepers, I promise you they're tallying up the score. Trannies aren't such a novelty anymore and it isn't like White men give a shit, so where's the benefit to women? And so I think Feminists will see to it that Tranny-men will be pushed back down to their rightful, deserved status of psycho-boys, mutilated faggots, men who failed at being men.

    The Left is eating itself and so sometimes I wonder as to which segments of the Left will emerge supreme. Feminists for now hold the cards until I see the Colors finally painting the Feminist left at the top of the party as the racists they are. But in gender terms, it will be a tug (heh) of war, but I'm betting on feminists. Consider: Muslim boy in Orlando shot up a bar full of homos and trannies and the press protected the Muslim and mostly buried the story quickly and so the Muslim side of the Left has privilege over the perverted side of the Left. I suspect feminism will beat out the male-2-female perverted tranny group and biology will assert itself in the feminist mindset once again if trannies gain true female privilege. But I also think that as Muslims install the caliphate, they will initially ally themselves with feminists in order to smear the perverts and put them down. But in the end, Muslims trump all the pressure groups of the Left and will in the end crush feminism and especially, the Jews. No one here or alive today may see it in the States in our lifetime, but that day is coming. And sure as privilege is in being or changing into a woman today, when privilege is in being a Muslim, everyone on the left will do THAT. Even, especially, White men.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  279. TheJester says:
    @Twinkie

    Now what are the Goodwhites going to do when it’s the Blacks who are demanding segregation?
     
    Don’t be daft. Blacks don’t want segregation. Who’d pay for stuff then? They want to be privileged among other races, which they already are - but more. They want us to grovel for their company.

    White women with black husbands used to be the bottom of the barrel. Okay, exceptions … but generalizations are not built on exceptions.

    However, living among the SJWs in Northern Virginia, I’ve noticed a social trend of late. Now, white professional women are marrying black male nationalists. They share each other’s disdain for white males. How do I know this? I notice the stickers on their cars: “Black Lives Matter”, “Black Power”, “Black is Beautiful”.

    Guess what? A sticker with, “It’s Okay to be White,” is not on the car.

    Their mulatto children, of course, are going to have a hard time reconciling with half of their heritage. I wonder if they will turn out like Barack Obama … hating white people because he is not one of them and hating his mother because she birthed him with such an ambiguous identity.

    I guess the white feminist female invective against the white male patriarchy has reached such a crescendo that white males are no longer viable marriage partners for many of them. Makes sense. Once you have joined the revolutionary struggle, how can you marry a member of the white race oppressing the rest of humanity?

    However, like Rachel Dolezal, I wonder how many of them will feel when they finally face the cultural reality of black male violence and other abuses against their female partners.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/rachel-dolezal-claimed-forced-sex-tape-article-1.2261643

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-sugarmann/black-women-face-a-greate_b_4157659.html

    http://www.vpc.org/press/press-release-archive/black-women-murdered-by-men-are-most-often-killed-with-a-gun-almost-always-by-someone-they-know-according-to-new-vpc-study-released-each-year-for-domestic-violence-awareness-month-3/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  280. @Old Palo Altan
    Exactly what I had been minded to say myself.

    And in reference to somebody else's post: Pinochet (the real one) was not "sadistic"- he was a hard-headed soldier who knew that you win battles by killing people. Once you've won, you settle back to ruling the country and, if any little bastard comes along who wants to start the war going again, well, then you kill him too.
    Pinochet did not persecute for the sake of persecuting. He surgically removed a cancer - and then set about healing the cancer's host. This he did so well that Chile, even after further years of Leftist misrule, is a model South American state.
    I did say to him the one time we met that he should have ignored the result of the election he lost in 1988. Those around the table looked shocked, even worried (perhaps for my health?) but the General merely shrugged - and then, smiling, offered me another cup of tea.

    People who hand wring about how Pinochet got his results are not serious people.

    Sorry Boomer Bros – Citizenism is a pipe dream and your snarky tldr essays on how the guy who wrote Mad Men is anti White aren’t going to convince the people currently getting away with attacking Trump supporters of anything other than that you DESERVE for your face to keep hitting their boot.

    The only decisive end to this insanity is going to be when the people wearing pussy hats and throwing paint thinner on Blair White are terrified of standing before a Deploreable Tribunal and facing summary justice.

    We got this way because the supposed Very Serious People on the Right kept telling flyover America that the Left “really wasn’t serious” about homo marriage/tranny bathrooms/pedophilia/amnesty/etc.

    The reality is even a big brain boomer like Steve Sailer can’t admit that the Left wants your guns so they can gulag you and kill you at will, but instead invents this inane conspiracy theory about how urban whites just want to keep Raven and Skyler safe from minorities with guns.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Nico

    The reality is even a big brain boomer like Steve Sailer can’t admit that the Left wants your guns so they can gulag you and kill you at will, but instead invents this inane conspiracy theory about how urban whites just want to keep Raven and Skyler safe from minorities with guns.
     
    The one isn't necessarily incompatible with the other, but you're correct to put the emphasis on the former. "The second amendment is for self-defense!" is NOT the appropriate argument. The right to bear arms is a necessary constitutional guarantee intrinsic to a citizen's republic of a last check on state-mandated abuse of the citizenry. That is the ONLY argument that matters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  281. Twinkie says:
    @Jack Hanson
    Theres a guy tweeting as General Pinochet and he makes a very valid point that the Left has been on a temper tantrum for the last 60 years, and has grown into a monster that eventually will have to be confronted. The best thing, in his words, would be a sudden swift hard confrontation now, to prevent the bloodbath that's going to come.

    Unfortunately, in the great American tradition, we will kick the can down the road.

    To be quite frank, I’ve been having Francoist fantasies more and more lately. People are electing “transgender” freaks – the country has gone nuts. This was not what I was promised when I came to this country in the early Reagan years. I was promised “It’s morning in America again” in return for my devotion and patriotism to the Republic and its people. I feel completely and totally betrayed. This was not why I lost friends and my own blood and flesh overseas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    I know that feel. I got into a few spats with my veteran friends when I asked them why they fly a flag that means, nowadays, you can be a deviant or desert to the enemy and it's aok.
    , @Nico

    I’ve been having Francoist fantasies more and more lately.
     
    I began having Francoist romantic sentiments since 2004, and they've been creeping up and out more and more the past two years. It's flared up even quicker the last two months when I watched a Spanish Civil War documentary while arranging the house. The documentary pretended to be neutral but was obviously anti-Franco. Even so, their outline of the nationalist movement was very inspiring: theirs is an excellent template for how to federate the saner elements of a society on a non-strictly-geographical basis and subvert the more fringy types into positive exertion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  282. Twinkie says:
    @eah
    Per whitepages.com, Mr Ekow N Yankah (how many of them could there be?) lives at 29 Perry St in NYC -- this is Greenwich Village -- per the demographic pie chart below, he's going to have a few problems keeping his kids away from white kids.

    http://unpackingthebookstore.susqu.edu/wp-content/uploads/Greenwich-Village-diversity.png

    It’d be so funny if it weren’t so sad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  283. biz says:
    @MarcB.
    The New Left are high on their own supply if they think this kind of talk won't spark a re-evaluation among fellow travelers of the more numerous Nominal Left, many whom have not realized until they've sided up with until it's made explicit in articles like this.

    Yes and no. Many in what you call the Nominal Left will either not read this, or skim it and think meh whatever and then flip to the sports or financial section, or flip on CNN to see the latest about who Roy Moore sexually assaulted.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  284. Forbes says:
    @a reader

    Thanks for that. My recollection was end of ’15, but it makes sense that it was shortly after the primaries started.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  285. martin2 says:
    @Tiny Duck
    The editorial breaks my heart because if I were in his shoes, I would very likely be saying the same things. I am a white man and it would be easy for me to say that he is committing the same sin that he is preaching against, but that would be wrong.

    Millions of whites voted for Trump and his despicable policies and values.

    The author would have every reason to disbelieve me if I told you that one of my proudest moments in the last year was when an African American member of my church said that I actually got what white privilege was about and that he was proud to call me brother.

    I can't challenge him to not stereotype white people and to not teach your children to do this because the risk of giving someone of my background the benefit of the doubt is borne entirely by him and his children. All I can ask is that he realize there are white people as sickened by Trump and his voters as you are and that they are trying to be worthy of his trust.

    Mr Duck is getting lazy and has copied this from the NYT website. But I was going to say…I looked at the comments at the NYT and could not believe the cringey apologetic BS coming from people that are presumably white and are actually agreeing with this black professor and saying how sorry they were for him and how sympathetic they were. But its all absolute crap! Blacks are far more violent than whites. Blacks commit far more crimes against whites than whites commit against blacks. The real denial is the left’s denial of the obvious, observable low IQs of blacks.

    In EVERY instance where blacks are in great numbers, control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we ALWAYS see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive, unable to support their own children, birthrates
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found

    What is wrong with these white people? How can white people be so f’ing pathetic! How can they be so so f’ing stupid? They are mad, literally insane. Its like they have edopted some crazy religious cult that says that aliens will be arriving on Xmas day.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  286. @jane claire
    Black people were free in Europe and England plus some Northern and North Eastern states before the civil war. So the idea that whites didn't treat blacks good enough after the war is A BIG FAT LIE. The KKK came about after the civil war, you can find the reason yourself. Also after the civil war blacks could vote, there were schools set up and they were elected to political office. Do some people get any more ignorant than those who post. Blacks were not forced to fight like the white man, I wonder why Jim Crow happened?
    Do you ever feel like your life is to be spent trying to make people of color better people, like that it's your purpose in life? That's propaganda.

    The KKK came about after the civil war, you can find the reason yourself.

    What was the reason?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  287. I cannot help my prurient curiosity regarding whether Mrs. Yankah’s sons suffered genital mutilation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  288. CCZ says:
    @S. Anonyia
    If that's the mother of his children I doubt the kids are even half as dark as the illustration that goes with the article. Shouldn't they have Drake's complexion?

    Also why does he call his wife "biethnic?" That's a new one. As is the line "white faces swept together"......like a horror movie.

    Here is “Mrs.”

    My name is Chavi Keeney Nana. I am a lawyer (international anti-corruption investigations, as well as civil trafficking suits) in Manhattan, where I also live with my husband, Ekow, and our son, Kofi. I have lived and studied abroad (UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Israel/Palestine) for significant portions of my career, come from a mixed background (Pakistani and Canadian/English/Irish), and still love traveling and exploring new places. I backpacked and hitchhiked throughout much of the Middle East, Europe, and some of Central America in my 20s and early 30s, though now tend to stay in bed and breakfasts and small homes (I am introducing my city loving husband to backpacking on a step by step basis). I love learning languages and cooking in my free time.

    Here is their Airbnb listed home.

    https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/7240997

    https://www.facebook.com/people/Chavi-Keeney-Nana/317465

    https://www.wilmerhale.com/chavi_nana/#!0

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eagle Eye
    So Ekow's son is indeed called Kofi, apparently a popular moniker back home in GHANA, e.g. Kofi Annan.

    Ghanaians are second only to Nigerians in scamming and racketeering. Both countries' offspring are well represented in politics in the UK.

    , @Lagertha
    hmmmm? upon seeing the photo of their airbnb, I wonder if it's just typical sour grapes of academics? I've been around a lot of professors, and, they bitch and moan about how their salaries are mediocre; they may never get tenure; and, that they are stuck sending their kids to public school because they live in a high-rent area to remain close to their Uni. His apartment looks smaller than the one I had in NYC, back in the day.

    Maybe, by writing this article, he thought he can make some extra money in the talk-show circuits? He is paying mega-bucks to live in what is probably, the best school district in NYC! - P.S. 41. So, maybe he is just super pissed-off that living in whitey area is expensive. I smell resentment of the parental kind. Besides, it doesn't take long for most other professionals to realize that the Wall Streeters and lawyers, really do own the City.

    West Village to East Village has been expensive since the late 70's. Because there is such an overwhelming amount of gay men, the number of families with children, most if not all, wealthy, is small. And, because it is The Village, dull public housing tenements were never built there. So, anyone with money (there are good Catholic schools there, too) and primary school-aged children (HS's are so-so) would kill to live for P.S. 41.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  289. Steve, I know you don’t like it when I reference “Negroes in Negroland” because you have blocked my comments a number of time when I have done so.

    But that book quotes primary sources including but not limited to the following: Burton, Speke, Barth, Baker, Livingston and Stanley. These were the guys who experienced first hand what Africa was like before colonization. Nasty and brutish? Sure. But they called it as they saw it.

    What else do we have to go on? After-the-fact invention? 20th century Ivy League “scholars” working from what? Let’s have a little intellectual honesty and courage here. This is what it was and this was the raw material Southern planters had to work with. Ta na Heshe Coates and his type get away with the bullshot narrative they peddle because they grossly understate the raw primitiveness of Africans in their native state.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Old Palo Altan
    I am delighted to find this reference to Hinton R Helper. When he lived in St Louis he boarded with an ancestral aunt of mine, a kindly widow, childless, who was passionately both Catholic and Confederate: the list of her property compiled after her death in 1887 mentions busts of Lee, Davis, and Pope Pius IX. Her house was popular with visiting southern dignitaries, and Helper was certainly one of the most interesting of these.
    He hated slavery because of its effect on poorer whites, and, detested by the slave-owning class, was appointed consul in Buenos Aires by Lincoln in 1861. When he returned to America in 1866 and saw what freed blacks were like, and what their presence would do to America's social health, he became their most passionate enemy - thus his book.
    Read it and learn. But then again we see it daily, don't we?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  290. El Dato says:
    @BenKenobi
    This guy gets it.

    Fourth generation memetic warfare. The diverse hordes are weaponized, but they are not under any formal command. The sword can cut both ways.

    What's to stop an interested party raising PoC flash mobs via social media?

    "YOU HAVE RESEARCHED NEGRO STORM."

    “YOU HAVE RESEARCHED NEGRO STORM.”

    I see a market in a PC Master Race game wherein a society of disparate individuals can be manipulated via various channels to react in a targeted way. Current events can be seamlessly woven in. Much fun and learning can be had. One could call it “uncivilization”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  291. @Yan Shen
    I said victimization, not necessarily violence. Anti-Asian racism is pretty common among blacks, whites, and Hispanics, as Chris Rock, Alexandra Wallace, or Yuli Gurriel all prove.

    “Anti-Asian racism is pretty common among blacks, whites”

    Feel free to go home. You came here. Uninvited. Frankly, any decent treatment you receive is more than you deserve.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  292. benjaminl says:
    @eah
    Per whitepages.com, Mr Ekow N Yankah (how many of them could there be?) lives at 29 Perry St in NYC -- this is Greenwich Village -- per the demographic pie chart below, he's going to have a few problems keeping his kids away from white kids.

    http://unpackingthebookstore.susqu.edu/wp-content/uploads/Greenwich-Village-diversity.png

    Well, in fairness to Mr. Yankah, New York City is such an overwhelmingly — dare I say, unbearably? — white place, that it must have been difficult for him to find a single neighborhood there that *wasn’t* overflowing with white people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    http://pics.city-data.com/nraces/40536.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  293. @ThreeCranes
    Steve, I know you don't like it when I reference "Negroes in Negroland" because you have blocked my comments a number of time when I have done so.

    But that book quotes primary sources including but not limited to the following: Burton, Speke, Barth, Baker, Livingston and Stanley. These were the guys who experienced first hand what Africa was like before colonization. Nasty and brutish? Sure. But they called it as they saw it.

    What else do we have to go on? After-the-fact invention? 20th century Ivy League "scholars" working from what? Let's have a little intellectual honesty and courage here. This is what it was and this was the raw material Southern planters had to work with. Ta na Heshe Coates and his type get away with the bullshot narrative they peddle because they grossly understate the raw primitiveness of Africans in their native state.

    I am delighted to find this reference to Hinton R Helper. When he lived in St Louis he boarded with an ancestral aunt of mine, a kindly widow, childless, who was passionately both Catholic and Confederate: the list of her property compiled after her death in 1887 mentions busts of Lee, Davis, and Pope Pius IX. Her house was popular with visiting southern dignitaries, and Helper was certainly one of the most interesting of these.
    He hated slavery because of its effect on poorer whites, and, detested by the slave-owning class, was appointed consul in Buenos Aires by Lincoln in 1861. When he returned to America in 1866 and saw what freed blacks were like, and what their presence would do to America’s social health, he became their most passionate enemy – thus his book.
    Read it and learn. But then again we see it daily, don’t we?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    "Read it and learn. But then again we see it daily, don’t we?"

    Indeed we do. It's that "deva vu all over again" quality that makes the book such a ghoulish and spellbinding read.
    , @Jack D
    I'm sorry but Helper was mentally ill. I think if he were around today he would be diagnosed as manic-depressive.

    He was convinced that Negroes are cannibals, when in fact they never have been any such thing. An American version of the blood libel.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-41072524
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  294. What sane white person want’s their kid anywhere near this toxic piece of shit?

    Sailer is desperately wrong if he thinks this thing has anything of value to add to America..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  295. Thomm says:
    @Pericles
    In other words, when the day comes, everyone will be happier if you stay on the other side of the fence.

    In other words, when the day comes, everyone will be happier if you stay on the other side of the fence.

    I am an American. And unlike you, I believe in American values (which were never about white nationalism).

    Remember, as a WN wigger, you are *supposed* to be miserable. It is what nature intended, since you represent waste matter than nature wants to eliminate from the white gene pool. High-achieving whites can only arise if the waste matter generated in the process is carried out via wastebaskets that the bottom 10-20% of whites represent (the women of this wastebasket group become bluehaired feminists, the men become WN losers).

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    And unlike you, I believe in American values (which were never about white nationalism).

    They were about actually enslaving blacks for quite some time. Does that thought never cross your mind when you drone on about "muh American values"?
    , @Pericles

    I am an American. And unlike you, I believe in American values (which were never about white nationalism).

     

    I'm sure you do, more specifically the eternal American values inscribed at the foot of the Statue of Liberty.

    High-achieving whites can only arise if the waste matter generated in the process is carried out via wastebaskets that the bottom 10-20% of whites represent
     
    If you weren't so incredibly high-achieving, this matter could be resolved quickly, efficiently, and voluntarily. See you on the other side (of the fence).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  296. Corvinus says:
    @Olorin

    HIS liking, but not necessarily the liking of whites and blacks and browns and reds and yellows who do not agree with that worldview.
     
    It would appear that you are deliciously innocent of the rapidity with which marginal and extreme views of What's Best For Society can be engineered into its members for the benefit of its engineers and exploiters.

    “It would appear that you are deliciously innocent of the rapidity with which marginal and extreme views of What’s Best For Society can be engineered into its members for the benefit of its engineers and exploiters.”

    You realize that would include race realism, the Zeroth Amendment, and a host of other Alt Right causes.

    They all have to go back.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  297. Nico says:
    @Jack Hanson
    People who hand wring about how Pinochet got his results are not serious people.

    Sorry Boomer Bros - Citizenism is a pipe dream and your snarky tldr essays on how the guy who wrote Mad Men is anti White aren't going to convince the people currently getting away with attacking Trump supporters of anything other than that you DESERVE for your face to keep hitting their boot.

    The only decisive end to this insanity is going to be when the people wearing pussy hats and throwing paint thinner on Blair White are terrified of standing before a Deploreable Tribunal and facing summary justice.

    We got this way because the supposed Very Serious People on the Right kept telling flyover America that the Left "really wasn't serious" about homo marriage/tranny bathrooms/pedophilia/amnesty/etc.

    The reality is even a big brain boomer like Steve Sailer can't admit that the Left wants your guns so they can gulag you and kill you at will, but instead invents this inane conspiracy theory about how urban whites just want to keep Raven and Skyler safe from minorities with guns.

    The reality is even a big brain boomer like Steve Sailer can’t admit that the Left wants your guns so they can gulag you and kill you at will, but instead invents this inane conspiracy theory about how urban whites just want to keep Raven and Skyler safe from minorities with guns.

    The one isn’t necessarily incompatible with the other, but you’re correct to put the emphasis on the former. “The second amendment is for self-defense!” is NOT the appropriate argument. The right to bear arms is a necessary constitutional guarantee intrinsic to a citizen