The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
My New Taki's Column: "Identity Stalinism"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From Taki’s Magazine:

Identity Stalinism
by Steve Sailer

January 23, 2019

The media’s latest Days of Rage, in which a white boy drove the national press into a frenzy by smiling at the leftist Person of Color banging a drum in his face, was like a greatest-hits collection of my old observations. So I’m going to take a victory lap to review how ideas I’ve been offering for years help explain much of the latest elite fury.

Read the whole thing there.

 
Hide 392 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Your ‘victory lap’ is well deserved. Although I’ve been suspicious of the left wing agenda of the mainstream press for a quite a few years, this incident does indeed really help to put things into perspective.

    • Replies: @Danindc
    If ALL the breaks go our way, Steve will be on a national monument by the year 2100. Hopefully he won’t look like angry giant MLK.
    , @Anonymous
    Those kids really need to take them all to task over this. The black Hebrew Israelites were clearly harassing children with threats of violence, blatant racism, and the like. There are laws against even adults behaving this way towards adults. And if they can get a criminal charge over it, then they can more easily be found guilty in civil court and have to pay the victims. Quite likely, Nathan's intentional harassment could also follow a similar route, given he intentionally walked over to them, looking to harass them.

    Threats of violence and the like from all the blue checks warrant their own charges. And what about a formal letter to Twitter demanding that the accounts be suspended/closed under Twitter's own rules? If Twitter demonstrably fails to act, and any one of those people issuing a threat is found guilty in court, Twitter would also be guilty of aiding them in it.

    Similarly the media owes some accountability for recklessly spreading this when it is well known we live in a place and time where death threats and anti-white hatred will be the response.

    We need to set up our own Rightwing Southern Poverty Law Center. You know, one that actually helps these poor Southern white boys in court.
    , @Keypusher
    “Victory lap”? There is no reason to be happy about the Covington situation. The school opened today, under guard. Nathan Phillips is still being treated as an authority. Indian organizations are demonstrating at the school rather than, say, against the Black Israelites who actually disparaged and demeaned them. MSM outlets are discussing whether wearing a MAGA hat is equivalent to wearing a swastika armband, or only 90% as bad. And, you can be certain that school administrators are busy writing "no MAGA hat" provisos into their conduct codes, the First Amendment be damned.
  2. First, in October, there was the Filipino-Italian bodybuilding male stripper who sent suspicious packages.

    Now, The Smirk Seen Around The World.

    I’m starting to think that in May of 2018, Philip Roth and Tom Wolfe did not die. They got together and merged into one being, a being which ascended to a higher plane of existence and which now uses the human race to make up stories for their own amusement.

    • Agree: Peter Johnson
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    But if it was Philip Roth then a white Christian would be traveling killing Jews just because they are Jewish and police would do nothing because of some sexual anxiety.
    , @Dieter Kief
    "(...) which now uses the human race to make up stories for their own amusement."

    Which means what: That poor me, being undoubtedly not one person glued together from the better halfes of a genius (Wolfe) and an at times impressive writer (the other one, you mention above) - as I say: Being only me, I have a good excuse to be not that amused about what's going on here. I find it quite troubling, I have to admit. And Jonathan Haidt's Heterodox Academy one of the good answers (Steve Sailer's on the spot dissections of these modern times conundrums working as an immediate pain killer - the victory lap is well deserved).

    (In small letters - very small ones: What about the new book, Mr. Sailer? Does it grow? It needn't become that big. Even 200+ p. would do nicely! title: Identity Stalinism)

    , @TWS
    I was wondering who was writing this comedy.
  3. All I can say is that
    “It is just the beginning”.
    America’s future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    “White man White woman couples” are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    • Replies: @istevefan
    South African whites are tremendously outnumbered. US Whites are not. There are close to 195 million of us. Even accounting for self-hating Whites, there are still well over 100 million.

    If a group that large gets run over by the coalition of the fringes, then it deserves it. For our opponents are not some cohesive, well-oiled machine like conquerors of the past. No, our foes are dregs and degenerates who have little to no martial skills at all.

    Check out the photos sometimes of those reporters and others who blabber about replacing us. Not exactly people to worry about. E.g. check out photos of that Alex chick in a prior post. After seeing her you sort of feel ashamed for having taken her seriously.

    We have the advantage of knowing what is in the hearts and minds of our foes. We have the advantage of facing such a sorry coalition. We have numbers too. If we end up like South African Whites, we will have deserved it.
    , @bro3886
    Puerto Rican parasite and all around pest Occasional-Cortex is now calling for reparations for all non-whites because of, wait for it, the New Deal. As if we haven't poured uncountable billions into Puerto Ricans. Yep, Barry was the beginning of third-world tribal politics in America. Brought to you mainly by all those conservative schmucks who PRETENDED than immigrants we're only economic units because they were afraid to be called racists by people who desire to exterminate them on a racial basis. I'M NOT AGAINST LE-E-E-GAL IMMIGRATION!

    https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/01/22/ocasio-cortez-compares-americas-past-to-nazi-germany-argues-us-should-pay-reparations-like-they-did-716599?

    Remember, anti-racism is just the con man's racist colonialism, designed only to give them an excuse to stay close to you so they can rob you. There's nothing moral about it.
    , @Thea
    Paraguay actually did outlaw white-white marriage in the nineteenth century but it didn’t stick.
    , @SunBakedSuburb
    "Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen."

    What is this sorcery you speak of and how can I obtain it?
    , @Jake
    "Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa."

    Our country is run by WASP Elites and their allies, preponderantly Jews. They are not primitive, but they know how to use the primitive to serve them as tools and weapons against the vast majority of white Gentiles.
    , @dfordoom

    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
     
    No, they won't. It's the rich who are in charge of all this. They're calling the shots. They're financing the Coalition of the Fringes. Wealth is most definitely not going to be seized.

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.
    , @obwandiyag
    God is your post stupid. The mind, she boggles.
    , @Peter Johnson
    Some really excellent comments on this thread - keep it up! We appreciate it.
  4. Anonymous[243] • Disclaimer says:

    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don’t need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be “content providers?” I understand the clickbait interns’ incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    • Replies: @njguy73

    why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?
     
    No, it's not satisfactory. She's too old to be the hot chick, she doesn't have the chops for Amy Adams/Jessica Chastain-type parts, and it would be a waste of time for her to ugly herself up and beg for an Oscar. As for selling stuff to moms, Gwyneth Paltrow and Jessica Alba are the Coke and Pepsi there, and Milano couldn't even be RC Cola.

    So SJWing it is.

    Unless someone wants to reboot Who's The Boss with her as the upper-class single mom who hires a Dominican ex-ballplayer to be her housekeeper.

    Gad! How do I do it?
    , @Jack D
    Partly virtue signalling and going along with the "in" crowd. Entertainment figures, especially female, always want to be on the side that is popular. They are like dogs who are attuned to pleasing (or manipulating) their masters in order to earn their living.

    And partly that no one wants to be seen as the first to stop clapping for Stalin. If you are not loudly clapping yourself, then maybe we have some reason to be suspicious of you? Maybe you are not really down with the Revolution? Maybe you once said something that could be taken as praise of a white person? We should check into this.

    But as long as you are clapping along with the others, the eye of Soros will have no reason to focus its gaze on you. You hope. So keep clapping.

    , @Thea
    Possibly left wing directors acquire a reputation for giving out roles to left wing starlets. Or previous starlets in her case.
    , @TelfoedJohn
    Can someone fill me in about when and why entertainers started pontificating about politics? Is it Bob Dylan’s fault? Seems to be a very Western thing. I can’t imagine Jackie Chan talking about the latest five year plan and being taken seriously.
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?
     
    Young Alyssa Milano? Maybe. Aging Alyssa? Hmmm.

    https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/08/AlyssaMilanorussia1.jpg
    , @Mr. Anon

    I understand the clickbait interns’ incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?
     
    She's only a celebrity if she stays in the public eye. Being woke is one way of doing that, in addition to gratifying her ego as being one of the good people.
    , @Russ

    Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?
     
    Her "activism" knows no boundaries. I surmise that it's out of latent guilt from having serviced directors to gain roles. Now that fornication is the new rape, she plays the victim role ... which of course spawns the activist role ... which is now activism in everything from abused animals to "abused" women. Little surprise that she saw oppression at first glance in the direction of the Covington youth. It's her nature.
    , @Keypusher
    It is obligatory now for celebrities to hold and express the correct opinion on gender and race questions and also on passing news items — so my 16-year-old-daughter tells me. I believe it. I think Taylor Swift finally endorsed some Democrats in the last election to squash the completely baseless rumor that she was a trump supporter.
    , @MBlanc46
    Alyssa who?
  5. If whites acted and thought like the coalition of the fringes’ leadership said we do, the various members would be too busy selling the others out to YT for the coalition to exist.

  6. This is like those situations where the cops shoot the black guy holding the gun even if it turns out later that he was the security guard and a good guy. You come upon a situation and the human mind immediately falls upon programmed stereotypes to make sense of it. Of course when you do this to a black person it is “systemic racism” but doing it to whites is okey dokey nowadays.

    This was all very predictable – the Left keeps shooting itself in the foot because they have no insight into their own behavior. They see racism just fine when it is being directed at them but they don’t see their own at all. What they are doing (“punch up”) is pure and holy and not racist, by definition.

    What is even funnier is that when they got called on their racism, it STILL wasn’t their fault. It was the fault of the “Trump Internet” that was poised and ready to pounce on their little error, which was after all made in good faith and with the best of intentions. Yes, it was wrong for them to say that they wanted the white boys and their families all to die a bloody painful death, but it was understandable given their rage at what appeared to be at first the massive disrespect the white boys were giving to a Native American Elder (and a Vietnam Veteran to boot!) by their improper facial expressions and imaginary chants.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    CNN now seriously promoting the conspiracy theory that this controversy was started by false-flag Trump supporters to make the left look bad. (I actually wish this was true.)
  7. What ive learened

    1. conservative whites love playing the victim

    2. conservatives believe in lies and gaslight

    3. conservatives will excuse evil behavior from white children

    4. conservatives are violent and hate filled

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    • LOL: byrresheim
    • Replies: @gda
    Thanks TD. It's good to have things clarified and summarized so adroitly .

    And since I've "learened" that the truth is ALWAYS the exact opposite of your spewings, we can confirm that even crazy old TD knows the real truth.

    This is the result of demonizing President Trump. The Dems have spun the narrative that Trump is Hitler/Stalin and therefore NOTHING that comes from Hitler/Stalin could possibly be good, so every single thing he does must be resisted and condemned.

    And all who associate with him, his cabinet, his policies, his family, his friends, his food, his dress, his HATS, his pets, etc. must be shamed, doxed, destroyed.

    Unfortunately, there are a lot of puppet-sheep who have been swayed by the evil of this adopted Alinsky "position" by the criminal left and their minions. It wouldn't be so bad if these folk were just puppets, or merely sheep, but puppet-sheep are extremely stupid, and highly resistant to truth. Their minds (such as they are) can NEVER be changed by facts.

    Personally, I've read "Human Accomplishment". I KNOW for a FACT that Europeans (aka 'white folk') are superior, at least in the vast majority of the type of accomplishments that matter, either in the recent past, or in the 21st century and going forward.

    And yes, when I say 'white folk' I do mean predominately 'white MEN'. (Sorry ladies).

    So all hail white patriarchy!

    And to think that TD led me to this revelation!

    , @Colin Wright
    'What ive learened...'

    My latest theory is that you're actually on the radical Right and are practising black propaganda. After all, consider '6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment.' Obviously, we're intended to believe someone from the Left still thinks that.

    The inconsistent misspellings confirm this. You can't handle 'I've' but manage to negotiate 'ultimate punishment' without a slip?

    I'm skeptical. This is faked, isn't it?

    , @Counterinsurgency
    As you can see, TD pretty much says that he can't live in an industrial society -- grates on his nerves too much. CG&LoE looks better than that.

    Counterinsurgency
    , @Gapeseed
    Give me a break.
    , @Mr. Anon

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment
     
    I know there is a lot of debate as to the nature of Tiny Duck. Is he for real? There are leftists who are really that stupid. On the other hand, given how over the top he is, some people figure he just has to be a put-on.

    That aside, just looking at he wrote there above - didn't he just call for a bunch of High School students to be put to death? Is that kind of post allowed here? Are there any consequences for that?
    , @fish
    Ohs Tinys……


    I caint's want to give you'n the "ultimit punishmint" tonights!

    Lendert "He be serious dis tyme" Plitss
    , @Keypusher
    ...an evening with Tiny Duck
    , @Anonymuse
    Thank god, I was not born black.
  8. From Steve’s article in Taki’s:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.

    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.

    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say “enough is enough!” what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever “they” are — and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, “they” will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn’t seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, “this doesn’t end well.”

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    "If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say “enough is enough!” what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time the media uses normal reactions by whites as evidence against us."
     

    Welcome to the dilemma faced by patriotic parties/movements in the UK like the BNP or EDL (or even UKIP). Attacks on you will be ignored by the media if serious injury is caused, if you're chased down the street with things being thrown it'll be used as proof of your unpopularity.

    If you stand your ground and fight (as EDL often do when attacked), or even if you don't, the headlines will read "35 arrested as trouble flares at EDL march" - even if every one of those 35 people is a left winger, and the local press will say "their hate-filled marches bring trouble to our streets" - half-true, but highly misleading because all the trouble comes from the other side.

    If someone finally has enough and goes postal like Thomas Mair - who killed his local Labour MP in the UK - stand by for the canonisation of the victim and 24/7 coverage. If someone like Theo Van Gogh is killed - well, he was asking for it, wasn't he?

    PS - OT, but this is very iSteve

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/oracle-owes-400m-to-women-black-asian-workers-dol-says

    "Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing."

    , @Jack D
    You play it just like those white boys did - you don't take the bait, you don't fall for the provocation. Yes, they were condemned anyway in the short run but (and this is driving the Left even more wild) in the longer cycle they won the confrontation. Nothing will change the mind of the most extreme, out of touch with reality Leftists but most reasonable people now understand that the initial picture presented of evil whites who might as well have been wearing KKK hoods and robes was not truthful - at a minimum the situation was "more complicated". Each time one of these hate hoaxes is perpetrated and then turns out to be a dud, it diminishes the impact of the tactic. Yes, the media keeps trying to memory hole them, but ordinary people are not idiots and remember and take media accounts nowadays with a grain of salt.

    Now the media keeps trying to flip the script and tell us that white teenagers from the sticks are really the "privileged" so that it is ok to punch "up" at them (while billionaires are the "oppressed") but people are not going to accept such topsy-turvy thinking in the long run. And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked - the way to gain sympathy is to maintain the high ground and make the bully look bad.

    , @Bill

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public.
     
    This is the key sentence. We can fight back after fighting back is no longer taken by the gullible (white) public to be such proof. That will happen after things get much worse. After this public is hardened against such claims by repetitive exposure to what is really going on. So, to answer the question "what must we do:" wait and pray for martyrs.
    , @Whiskey
    Make life as miserable as possible to select enemies.

    Example help the kids lawyers sue Patton Oswald who doxxed the kid into bankruptcy. Disrupt his standup performances. Picket his home. Picket his agency. Picket his agents home. All by anon decentralized flash mobs. No one to countersue or arrest.

    Strategic deterrence. The only way in a multi cultural society.
    , @log

    How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?
     
    The only hope for survival is to implement the teachings of Jesus Christ, as found in Matthew 5-7, and Luke 6:20-49.

    All other courses lead to annihilation.
    , @Lot
    "what are we to do? "

    Start thinking about 2020. Call up your nearest local GOP office and offer your time.
    , @Danindc
    Separation is the answer. Hopefully peaceful. The country is too diverse for harmony.

    I could see your point with whites fighting back and being vilified but this also might gain us some respect and could help bargaining when a majority of citizens think we need to disband.

    Or we just go on like this for another 100 years with things getting incrementally worse. But at some point there’s gotta be separation.

    What’s the time frame? I’m curious. I’m mid 40’s. What am I looking at when I’m 60? 70? 80?
    , @Hypnotoad666

    How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?
     
    The key to the whole thing is overturning the central (self-imposed) taboo in American culture and politics: i.e., that Whites shall not be allowed to form a group identity or advocate for their interests, as such.

    This will be very, very difficult due to the ingrained cuckery of most Whites in positions of power. But once a tipping point is reached where even the cowards and careerists are not frightened to treat Whites as just another ethnic group, the whole anti-White edifice will come tumbling down.

    To begin the process, Whites need to wrap their minds around the new paradigm that Legacy Americans are now an embattled minority. The anti-White left fully controls the Media, Hollywood, the Permanent Bureaucracy, Academia, and even the crony capitalist corporations.

    So reject all obsolete sentiments of collective guilt or noblesse oblige. Instead, simply develop a mental immunity to charges of "racism." No apologizing or virtue signalling that "I am one of the good ones," and "of course there is real discrimination against marginalized people but . . ."

    If wanting equal treatment is "racist," then color me "racist." (Maybe we should own the word like blacks call each other "my nigga.")

    In terms of forming tactics and strategy, I think a good guideline is to ask ourselves WWJD? -- By that, I mean "What Would Jews Do?"

    If someone tries to shame the Jews about their oppression of Palestinians do they cringe and grovel and apologize? Hell no. They go on the offensive and accuse their accuser of "Anti-Semitism." Legacy Americans likewise need to stay on the offensive against anti-White racism. In addition to being effective, this position has the added benefit of being morally correct.
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson 3

    and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us
     
    Algerian model. Ugly, painful and tragic, but you can increase the tension on a spring only so far before it gives way.
    , @MEH 0910
    The late Lawrence Auster's First Law of Majority-Minority Relations and it's corollary:

    The worse any designated minority or alien group behaves in a liberal society, the bigger become the lies of Political Correctess in covering up for that group.
    ......

    That last point leads us to the first corollary of Auster’s First Law of Majority/Minority Relations in Liberal Society: The more egregiously any non-Western or non-white group behaves, the more evil whites are made to appear for noticing and drawing rational conclusions about that group’s bad behavior.

    The First Law and its corollary are intrinsic to liberalism. Once the equality of all human groups is accepted as a given, any facts that make a minority or foreign group seem worse than the majority native group must be either covered up or blamed on the majority.
     
    , @Thea
    Simply continue to exist and behave with dignity. Above all have babies. Just our continued existence is a provocation. Refuse to give in to despair and maintain a standard of behavior for your children to emulate instead of Richard spencer juvenilia.
    , @utu

    How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them?
     
    Do what the Yellow Vests do. First, get out of the Sailer's ghetto. Broaden the narrative. Make it about the economy and the system. Fight the swamp not the tools and props that the swamp is using like the ridiculous Indian guy and his drum and the silly Black Hebrews.
    , @Issac
    You observe well. There is no path forward for your people without a non-trivial elite cohort supporting you. If I were a white American, I would be planning my family's exit strategy.
    , @Johnny Smoggins
    Do you really care if you've proven their point that you're "a hater" if after the millionth provocation you strike back?

    Remember this; British intelligence estimates that at its peak, the IRA only had around two hundred active (as in men actually doing the bombing and shooting) members. And yet they were able to force the hand of the much, much stronger British government and military to bend to their will.

    Paying them to behave, sucking up and retreating has only made them angrier and more aggressive. Time to try different tactics.

    Read Siege.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E02rvzOtKs&t=156s
    , @MBlanc46
    The way out is to cut the Gordian knot. Kick over the table and let the chips fall where they may.
    , @anon
    The answer is, we need a war. I don't care how bad war is. The only thing that will lance this boil and let the puss run out is a civil war. The left will start it, like John Brown's raid. We should encourage them to start it. Give them ammunition to hate us. Let them start it.
    , @TTSSYF
    Strengthening federalism by self-sorting into red states (Kentucky?) and making them overwhelmingly red and, therefore, repellant to Lefties, is one potentially non-violent path to take. And, in the meantime, refuse to honor a Leftie with a conversation on our current state of affairs or politics. Ignore and avoid them.
  9. I thought this entire affair was so stupid and obviously a manufactured controversy that I was going to ignore it, but now that the details are out, I think it has a more sinister connotation. What the media and leftists are attempting to do is bully any organized right wing or republican political activism. By showcasing these students on national media and demonizing them, the establishment is exposing them to future leftist harassment and even attack. I’m sure that smirking boy will have less success than comparable students in the college application process now. Perhaps all Covington students will now! There are probably loony leftists apparatchiks at every school just licking their lips with eagerness for their applications to arrive!

    When parents and administrators realize this, they will in the future be reluctant to bring students to rallies or political events realizing the prudence of laying low. It’s sort of like a small scale Charlottesville. Rightist will demur from public demonstration for fear of leftist bullying.

    • Replies: @Lot
    "obviously a manufactured controversy "

    The initial video was from instagram, but a now suspended Russian twitter (claiming to be a California teacher and using the image of a Brazilian woman) edited it down deceptively, gave it the inflammatory headline, and made it viral. The account posted 130 times per day on average.

    Same thing they did in 2016, stoking BLM and police shooting articles.
    , @penskefile
    My child's Catholic high school sent a contingent to the March for Life as well. It took them a three-day bus ride to get there (my son did not attend, but some of his friends did). The parents I know are more resolved than ever to go back. I think next year will be record attendance as this incident has really struck a chord among our demographic. We all saw our kid in Nick Sandmann
    , @Achmed E. Newman

    I’m sure that smirking boy will have less success than comparable students in the college application process now. Perhaps all Covington students will now! There are probably loony leftists apparatchiks at every school just licking their lips with eagerness for their applications to arrive!
     
    See, now that's the right's problem as much as the left's. If you're still gonna play their game, sucking up to attend the fancy expensive Ivy League schools, dealing with the ctrl-left (most of them) HR ladies, worrying about what the other parents in the PTO (public schools) will think, etc., yeah, you will lose that way. Don't play their games. They OWN the institutions: lower-ed, higher-ed, media, Big-Biz, and governments, all of it. If you revere all of that, then you are playing their game. Stick together!

    I hate to say we use another slogan from the 1960's, but, hell, tune out and drop out, and what the hell was the other thing?

    , @dfordoom

    What the media and leftists are attempting to do is bully any organized right wing or republican political activism.
     
    It's more that they are determined to demonstrate that only approved political activism is permitted. And non-approved political activism, of either the right or the left, is forbidden. All political activism must follow the script.

    All dissent, from left or right, is going to be crushed.
  10. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    “If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say “enough is enough!” what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time the media uses normal reactions by whites as evidence against us.”

    Welcome to the dilemma faced by patriotic parties/movements in the UK like the BNP or EDL (or even UKIP). Attacks on you will be ignored by the media if serious injury is caused, if you’re chased down the street with things being thrown it’ll be used as proof of your unpopularity.

    If you stand your ground and fight (as EDL often do when attacked), or even if you don’t, the headlines will read “35 arrested as trouble flares at EDL march” – even if every one of those 35 people is a left winger, and the local press will say “their hate-filled marches bring trouble to our streets” – half-true, but highly misleading because all the trouble comes from the other side.

    If someone finally has enough and goes postal like Thomas Mair – who killed his local Labour MP in the UK – stand by for the canonisation of the victim and 24/7 coverage. If someone like Theo Van Gogh is killed – well, he was asking for it, wasn’t he?

    PS – OT, but this is very iSteve

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/oracle-owes-400m-to-women-black-asian-workers-dol-says

    “Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing.”

    • Replies: @Redneck farmer
    But, but, but, Trump isn't doing anything!- scream the blackpilled douchebags.
    , @Hypnotoad666

    “Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing.”
     
    Yes, this is very iSteve, and I have to guess he will do a post on it when he gets a chance.

    The Complaint filed by the DOL is interesting due to its internal incoherence and its mangling of statistics. Basically, it says that Oracle prefers Asians, who make up 75 percent of its workforce. Yet Oracle is supposedly also discriminating against Asians because, on average, they make 4% less pay than the 25% of the workforce which is white.

    The Complaint also bizarrely alleges discrimination against "women," without noting how many women are Asian vs. White. This completely confuses their race and gender arguments.
    , @Anonymous
    Oracle robbed just about anyone who wasn't a pasty white male of $400m, says Uncle Sam: Lucrative govt IT contracts at risk in discrim row

    The bizarre clickbait headline is followed by:

    Amid the Dept of Labor's allegations is the claim that Big Red prefers to scoop up foreign Asian graduates on the cheap, sponsor their US immigration visas, and then keep a relatively low ceiling their wages. We're told that if you happen to be Asian and a recent college graduate – particularly an Indian grad – Big Red will favor you over other university-age candidates, and offer you a job in America as a level-one professional techie.

    Whites, Hispanics, and African Americans were all unfairly snubbed during the recruitment process of college-age kids, according to the department's complaint.
     
    Well, databases ARE boring....

    While the color of your skin may help you get aboard, it won't help you embiggen your wage packet, it is claimed. Raises are seemingly reserved for White blokes. ... Dept of Labor said Asians and African Americans had lower than expected pay compared to their White colleagues, and women lower than men, even when factors from full-time status and global career level, to job specialty, estimated prior work experience, and company tenure were taken into account.
     
    Lousy employer, apparently.

    And there is a take on everything.

    In a statement, Oracle's top brass said: "This meritless lawsuit is based on false allegations and a seriously flawed process within the OFCCP that relies on cherry-picked statistics rather than reality. We fiercely disagree with the spurious claims and will continue in the process to prove them false. We are in compliance with our regulatory obligations, committed to equality, and proud of our employees."
     
    , @MBlanc46
    Ah jeez. And DJT is the boss of the DoL. What’s the point of winning when we keep losing?
  11. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    You play it just like those white boys did – you don’t take the bait, you don’t fall for the provocation. Yes, they were condemned anyway in the short run but (and this is driving the Left even more wild) in the longer cycle they won the confrontation. Nothing will change the mind of the most extreme, out of touch with reality Leftists but most reasonable people now understand that the initial picture presented of evil whites who might as well have been wearing KKK hoods and robes was not truthful – at a minimum the situation was “more complicated”. Each time one of these hate hoaxes is perpetrated and then turns out to be a dud, it diminishes the impact of the tactic. Yes, the media keeps trying to memory hole them, but ordinary people are not idiots and remember and take media accounts nowadays with a grain of salt.

    Now the media keeps trying to flip the script and tell us that white teenagers from the sticks are really the “privileged” so that it is ok to punch “up” at them (while billionaires are the “oppressed”) but people are not going to accept such topsy-turvy thinking in the long run. And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked – the way to gain sympathy is to maintain the high ground and make the bully look bad.

    • Agree: Thea, PhysicistDave
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    Sovereignty is always consensus by the majority. When the majority of the Soviets no longer believed in the Soviet Union, it disappeared. NATO gave Gaddafi a push, and his regime--and his whole artificial country--toppled over. When the Baltics asked the Russians to leave, they did. Russians don't really have it in them to go full-Pizarro any more.

    ISIS very nearly had their own country, but violent, consumptive religions don't do well turning young people into spouses and parents, which is really all it's all about. ISIS just doesn't have the numbers, so they don't get sovereignty.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 - 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative "Gandhiism" will be crushed.
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson 3
    Gandhi faced the British, a fundamentally moral people. Do you think that is what we face with the Left?
    , @Achmed E. Newman

    And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked ...
     
    As Mr. Wilson replied already, Ghandi was dealing with the British, a much more civilized people at the time than the modern ctrl-left. That sounds like idiotic advice in general - would you tell your boys that, Jack? No, you need to bloody up the bully's nose right away. I think I will not read any more Gandhi for advice. He sounds like a 'tard, who just had the power of numbers behind him.

    Don't read this the wrong way - I don't mean that kid should have punched out that Indian, as good as it would have felt, I'm sure. He did a good job remaining calm, and nobody did him or his schoolmates any physical violence. They need to come down on anyone who has libeled or threatened them with some legal action, for starters.
    , @L Woods

    ordinary people are not idiots
     
    Citation needed.
    , @The preferred nomenclature is...
    I'd say most ordinary people in the FUSA are idiots (if you are including all the non-White males).
  12. Freud came up with a lot of bad ideas, but one of his better ones is “projection”

    My favorite Freud quotes:

    “And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?”

    “Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.”

    • LOL: Autochthon
  13. @Jack D
    You play it just like those white boys did - you don't take the bait, you don't fall for the provocation. Yes, they were condemned anyway in the short run but (and this is driving the Left even more wild) in the longer cycle they won the confrontation. Nothing will change the mind of the most extreme, out of touch with reality Leftists but most reasonable people now understand that the initial picture presented of evil whites who might as well have been wearing KKK hoods and robes was not truthful - at a minimum the situation was "more complicated". Each time one of these hate hoaxes is perpetrated and then turns out to be a dud, it diminishes the impact of the tactic. Yes, the media keeps trying to memory hole them, but ordinary people are not idiots and remember and take media accounts nowadays with a grain of salt.

    Now the media keeps trying to flip the script and tell us that white teenagers from the sticks are really the "privileged" so that it is ok to punch "up" at them (while billionaires are the "oppressed") but people are not going to accept such topsy-turvy thinking in the long run. And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked - the way to gain sympathy is to maintain the high ground and make the bully look bad.

    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    Sovereignty is always consensus by the majority. When the majority of the Soviets no longer believed in the Soviet Union, it disappeared. NATO gave Gaddafi a push, and his regime–and his whole artificial country–toppled over. When the Baltics asked the Russians to leave, they did. Russians don’t really have it in them to go full-Pizarro any more.

    ISIS very nearly had their own country, but violent, consumptive religions don’t do well turning young people into spouses and parents, which is really all it’s all about. ISIS just doesn’t have the numbers, so they don’t get sovereignty.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 – 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative “Gandhiism” will be crushed.

    • Agree: utu, Counterinsurgency
    • Replies: @rufus
    Camps/prisons, Deportation, End Visa issuance.

    The new segregation. You homo/pedo/diversity operators want eliminationist rhetoric you got it from the primary source.
    , @anon
    What? The vast majority of Russians (and therefore, of Soviets) very much believed in the Soviet Union and still do. Whether it was under the guise of Soviet Union or Greater Russia did not much matter. What broke it apart was the outlying nations acting boldly and Gorbachev being unwilling to engage in mass killings of pro-independence protesters, though some tens of them did get killed at various protests.
    , @istevefan

    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.
     
    So do we. And our numbers include the people who are probably the most heavily armed civilian population in human history.
    , @dfordoom

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 – 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative “Gandhiism” will be crushed.
     
    Agreed.

    Gandhi could also rely on favourable coverage in the left-wing press.

    The anti-Vietnam War protestors in the late 60s could rely on incredibly favourable coverage in the liberal media.

    Dissidents in the Soviet Union could rely on favourable coverage in the western media. There was no way Solzhenitsyn could be quietly silenced with a bullet to the back of the head.

    Anyone who tries to protest against the current orthodoxy is going to get uniformly hostile media coverage worldwide. It will be explained to the masses that these people are evil racist Nazis. The overwhelming majority of the population will believe this because it's the only version they're going to hear. What a handful of people say on Unz Review is irrelevant,. Most people don't know that Unz Review exists. The few who do know also know that it's an evil racist Nazi hate site.

    No elite has ever controlled the Megaphone as completely as our current elites do.
    , @byrresheim
    Think of Bose for a moment.

    At the point Louis Battenberg was sent to India to execute one of the fastest and most successful military retreats in human history, Bose may have been dead, but his legacy, a colonial military on the brink of rebellion lived on.

    That everybody heard of Ghandi and nobody of Bose is no mean feat of British propaganda. The pirate's empire would have collapsed even swifter had it become common knowledge that they had to cede to a very serious threat of massacre – that way, they could exploit other countries for another one or two decades.
    , @MBlanc46
    You are correct. But remember that, in addition to Ghandiism, there was a lot of anti-British violence taking place in India. While some of us are taking the nonviolent high road, others of us will have to be smashing the china.
  14. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public.

    This is the key sentence. We can fight back after fighting back is no longer taken by the gullible (white) public to be such proof. That will happen after things get much worse. After this public is hardened against such claims by repetitive exposure to what is really going on. So, to answer the question “what must we do:” wait and pray for martyrs.

  15. Dennis Dale means “free rein” — not, for God’s sake, “free reign.”

    • Replies: @Dennis Dale
    Doh! Damn. It's a tweet too. Can't even fix it. You get the idea.

    Thanks Steve.
  16. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    Make life as miserable as possible to select enemies.

    Example help the kids lawyers sue Patton Oswald who doxxed the kid into bankruptcy. Disrupt his standup performances. Picket his home. Picket his agency. Picket his agents home. All by anon decentralized flash mobs. No one to countersue or arrest.

    Strategic deterrence. The only way in a multi cultural society.

    • Agree: Johnny Smoggins, TheBoom
  17. BIG NEWS FLASH TO REAL AMERICA: it’s not safe to send your kids to Washington DC anymore.Go somewhere like the Hermitage in TN. and pay respects to a great man who knew how to handle a clapped out old indian…by the way.

    • Agree: Redneck farmer
    • Replies: @Danindc
    Lol. I was just looking there. Nashville is hot now. Good golf too.
    , @Autochthon
    I hate to break it to you but if you are going to Nashville you will be dodging Iraqis and Mexicans as you make your way past the Somali Community Centre.
  18. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    The only hope for survival is to implement the teachings of Jesus Christ, as found in Matthew 5-7, and Luke 6:20-49.

    All other courses lead to annihilation.

    • Replies: @Johnny Smoggins
    The faggy, feminine teachings of Jesus Christ are the main reason we're in the mess we're in.

    Please, no more of this turn-the-other-cheek shit.
  19. Good article, but one correction: It’s HoloDoMor, not HoloMoDor.
    From Russian/Ukrainian “golod” (pronounced “holod” in the Ukrainian dialect): hunger + “moritj”: kill slowly, by deprivation.

    • Replies: @Anon
    West is now about Homo-Do-More
    , @anon
    An understandable Tolkienian slip, perhaps - Holomo(r)dor.
  20. In contrast, the more similar you are to a Minuteman of 1776, the more likely you are to vote Republican.

    Uh, no. Source: Am lifelong resident of Massachusetts.

    • Replies: @snorlax
    Was true until 1992 (except 1964) at the national level and until 2004/6 within the Northeast.
    , @Hail
    1. Weren't the Minutemen of 1775?

    2. Snorlax: While in broad and nationwide terms Steve's statement is definitely correct, you seem to be disputing that it holds in Massachusetts.

    It depends what we mean by "similar to a Minuteman." I find it improbable, to say the least, that gun-owning and overtly patriotic White-Protestant Massachusetts men who are interested in militias are less likely to vote Republican.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts 'WASPs' (of the whom nearly all the Minutemen will have been), sans qualifications like gun-ownership, are less likely to vote Republican. If this is your claim, what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?

    IOW, who makes up the still-substantial 'R' vote below:

    Massachusetts D-R presidential vote split
    1972: 54-45
    1976: 56-40
    1980: 42-42 (Reagan takes EVs by a tenth of a %)
    1984: 48-51 (Reagan takes EVs)
    1988: 53-45
    1992: 48-37
    1996: 62-28
    2000: 60-33
    2004: 62-37
    2008: 62-36
    2012: 61-38
    2016: 60-33

    (Note that Trump did better than Dole '96 and no worse than any post-Dole Republican, despite worsening racial-political demographics.)

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast:

    https://hailtoyou.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/racialreligiousvote2012.png

    , @Barnard
    You are taking his point too literally. I have an ancestor who was a Minuteman and no one in my family line has lived in New England for five generations. Lots of white people outside the Northeast have a similar family history on ancestors moving west.
    , @Counterinsurgency
    No. Current Left coalition is Yankees and NYC, just as it was during the Civil War. Yankees and NYC dominated California cities after the American annexation, so the Left Coast is also in the Left coalition.
    If you want confirmation, try arguing with a Unitarian about politics. He (or she or it) won't even reply, most times. Or with a New Yorker, although that's a bit more physically risky.

    Counterinsurgency
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    Sailer’s sentence makes sense. He specifically likens contemporary Republicans (as opposed to Democrats) to Revolutionary War Minutemen in demographic similarity—i.e. white, male, pro-gun.
  21. @Jack D
    You play it just like those white boys did - you don't take the bait, you don't fall for the provocation. Yes, they were condemned anyway in the short run but (and this is driving the Left even more wild) in the longer cycle they won the confrontation. Nothing will change the mind of the most extreme, out of touch with reality Leftists but most reasonable people now understand that the initial picture presented of evil whites who might as well have been wearing KKK hoods and robes was not truthful - at a minimum the situation was "more complicated". Each time one of these hate hoaxes is perpetrated and then turns out to be a dud, it diminishes the impact of the tactic. Yes, the media keeps trying to memory hole them, but ordinary people are not idiots and remember and take media accounts nowadays with a grain of salt.

    Now the media keeps trying to flip the script and tell us that white teenagers from the sticks are really the "privileged" so that it is ok to punch "up" at them (while billionaires are the "oppressed") but people are not going to accept such topsy-turvy thinking in the long run. And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked - the way to gain sympathy is to maintain the high ground and make the bully look bad.

    Gandhi faced the British, a fundamentally moral people. Do you think that is what we face with the Left?

    • Replies: @Jack D
    You don't have to win with Leftists. You are never going to win with Leftists. If it was up to Leftists, Hillary Clinton would be President or maybe even Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would be Presidente for Life. But that's not who you have to win with. You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That's why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.
    , @AnotherDad

    Gandhi faced the British, a fundamentally moral people. Do you think that is what we face with the Left?
     
    Yes, and with a reasonably fair press. And still they didn't get the Brits out of their country until the Brits
    -- had just fought a war where the casus belli--and moral justification--was the Germans being in other people's countries
    -- and were bankrupt.
  22. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    “what are we to do? ”

    Start thinking about 2020. Call up your nearest local GOP office and offer your time.

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    Bugger the Repubs. They will be doing every thing in their power to destroy DJT. They are not our friends. They are more our enemies than the SJWs are.
  23. @snorlax

    In contrast, the more similar you are to a Minuteman of 1776, the more likely you are to vote Republican.
     
    Uh, no. Source: Am lifelong resident of Massachusetts.

    Was true until 1992 (except 1964) at the national level and until 2004/6 within the Northeast.

  24. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    Separation is the answer. Hopefully peaceful. The country is too diverse for harmony.

    I could see your point with whites fighting back and being vilified but this also might gain us some respect and could help bargaining when a majority of citizens think we need to disband.

    Or we just go on like this for another 100 years with things getting incrementally worse. But at some point there’s gotta be separation.

    What’s the time frame? I’m curious. I’m mid 40’s. What am I looking at when I’m 60? 70? 80?

    • Agree: MBlanc46
  25. @tyrone
    BIG NEWS FLASH TO REAL AMERICA: it's not safe to send your kids to Washington DC anymore.Go somewhere like the Hermitage in TN. and pay respects to a great man who knew how to handle a clapped out old indian…by the way.

    Lol. I was just looking there. Nashville is hot now. Good golf too.

  26. @snorlax

    In contrast, the more similar you are to a Minuteman of 1776, the more likely you are to vote Republican.
     
    Uh, no. Source: Am lifelong resident of Massachusetts.

    1. Weren’t the Minutemen of 1775?

    2. Snorlax: While in broad and nationwide terms Steve’s statement is definitely correct, you seem to be disputing that it holds in Massachusetts.

    It depends what we mean by “similar to a Minuteman.” I find it improbable, to say the least, that gun-owning and overtly patriotic White-Protestant Massachusetts men who are interested in militias are less likely to vote Republican.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts ‘WASPs’ (of the whom nearly all the Minutemen will have been), sans qualifications like gun-ownership, are less likely to vote Republican. If this is your claim, what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?

    IOW, who makes up the still-substantial ‘R’ vote below:

    Massachusetts D-R presidential vote split
    1972: 54-45
    1976: 56-40
    1980: 42-42 (Reagan takes EVs by a tenth of a %)
    1984: 48-51 (Reagan takes EVs)
    1988: 53-45
    1992: 48-37
    1996: 62-28
    2000: 60-33
    2004: 62-37
    2008: 62-36
    2012: 61-38
    2016: 60-33

    (Note that Trump did better than Dole ’96 and no worse than any post-Dole Republican, despite worsening racial-political demographics.)

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast:

    • Replies: @Lot
    In the NE the most GOP ethnic groups are Scots Irish in the hills and Italians and Orthodox Jews in the cities and suburbs. Also recent East Euro immigrants though they don't vote in large numbers.

    The old puritan class, if they never changed churches, would be UCC, UU, and independent congregationalists, all ultra left, even compared to other mainline protestant groups.

    I think even this group is moving to the GOP, just from a low base.
    , @Lot
    "Note that Trump did better than Dole ’96 and no worse than any post-Dole Republican"

    Trump did relatively well in most of the NE and relatively poorly in the very strongly GOP areas of the South and Plains. These areas weren't competitive so didn't get the attention of his huge rust belt over performance.
    , @snorlax

    While in broad and nationwide terms Steve’s statement is definitely correct
     
    The Minutemen were Massachusetts-specific.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts ‘WASP,’ sans qualifications like gun-ownership, is less likely to vote Republican.
     
    Yes. And WASP gun-owners would be less R-voting than other white gun-owners.

    what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?
     
    Italians, Portuguese and French-Canadians among others. Irish vote more D in the typical D landslides or when a Kennedy is on the ballot, but more R in close and/or R-won elections, and are more conservative on the issues.

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast.
     
    The Protestant/Catholic difference there is well within the margin of error, and I would say clearly erroneous.

    It's also out-of-date as pertains to Massachusetts; our WASPs swung extremely hard against Trump and appear to have voted similarly to Jews, Armenians and Hispanics in 2016/8. For example, Dover (MA's wealthiest town and 56-43 Romney in 2013), which had NEVER voted for a Democrat at the presidential level (it even voted for Goldwater!), went 57-32 Clinton.
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican

    1. Weren’t the Minutemen of 1775?
     
    That is the significant date. Rare oversight by Steve. I’m disappointed he’s not making a point to read every single one of my comments. :)
  27. @Chaotic Neutral
    I thought this entire affair was so stupid and obviously a manufactured controversy that I was going to ignore it, but now that the details are out, I think it has a more sinister connotation. What the media and leftists are attempting to do is bully any organized right wing or republican political activism. By showcasing these students on national media and demonizing them, the establishment is exposing them to future leftist harassment and even attack. I’m sure that smirking boy will have less success than comparable students in the college application process now. Perhaps all Covington students will now! There are probably loony leftists apparatchiks at every school just licking their lips with eagerness for their applications to arrive!

    When parents and administrators realize this, they will in the future be reluctant to bring students to rallies or political events realizing the prudence of laying low. It’s sort of like a small scale Charlottesville. Rightist will demur from public demonstration for fear of leftist bullying.

    “obviously a manufactured controversy ”

    The initial video was from instagram, but a now suspended Russian twitter (claiming to be a California teacher and using the image of a Brazilian woman) edited it down deceptively, gave it the inflammatory headline, and made it viral. The account posted 130 times per day on average.

    Same thing they did in 2016, stoking BLM and police shooting articles.

    • Replies: @AnonAnon

    The initial video was from instagram, but a now suspended Russian twitter
     
    Those pesky Russians. Sure the true source wasn’t deep state types making it look like “the Russians”?
  28. @Mr. Hack
    Your 'victory lap' is well deserved. Although I've been suspicious of the left wing agenda of the mainstream press for a quite a few years, this incident does indeed really help to put things into perspective.

    If ALL the breaks go our way, Steve will be on a national monument by the year 2100. Hopefully he won’t look like angry giant MLK.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    If another Chinese sculptor gets the gig, Steve will look like Leonid Brezhnev.
  29. Great article. This particular incident couldn’t have gone better for Trump and his supporters. Twas a great victory for the MAGA hat wearers (and makers) and a gift that keeps on giving for the anti-SJW community.

    Then again, if one of those kids gets hurt or killed or hurts or kills himself as a result of the left’s malevolent hysteria, there will be no way to ever look at this incident as anything other than an irremovable black stain on America’s soul.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
    I think it already is an irremovable black stain, but not on all of America -- just on those Americans who made public comments encouraging the painful, bloody deaths of the boys and their families. Anyone who could, of their own free will, publicly make such comments is consumed with such white-hot, irrational hatred that he/she/it is beyond redemption.

    No "apology" or retraction should be accepted for such incitements to violence. Conviction and hard time in prison is called for. That would be the equivalent of a quick punch on the nose to these bullies and might stave off bloody violence in the streets, at least, for awhile.

  30. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    No, it’s not satisfactory. She’s too old to be the hot chick, she doesn’t have the chops for Amy Adams/Jessica Chastain-type parts, and it would be a waste of time for her to ugly herself up and beg for an Oscar. As for selling stuff to moms, Gwyneth Paltrow and Jessica Alba are the Coke and Pepsi there, and Milano couldn’t even be RC Cola.

    So SJWing it is.

    Unless someone wants to reboot Who’s The Boss with her as the upper-class single mom who hires a Dominican ex-ballplayer to be her housekeeper.

    Gad! How do I do it?

  31. Steve, fantastic piece today as always, but there’s one particularly bizarre (in my dumb opinion, anyway) aspect of this smirk insanity that goes unmentioned in your article: borderline-hysterical journal obsessions with being bullied in HS (and to a lesser extent, college).  

    I first noticed this during the Kavanaugh imbroglio: a whole subset of people oftentimes well into middle-age who I would imagine enjoy six-figure salaries and a decent amount of social standing (at least in their blue-check, NPR tote-carrying circles) falling to pieces reminiscing about being abused, to varying degrees real or imagined, by the kids who were richer/whiter/more popular/stronger/thinner/more heterosexual etc. than they.  It struck me as, if genuine, a sign of some woefully maladjusted people.

    I mean shit, New York Magazine ran a piece solely comprised of interviews with five people (including an overweight gay Latino, of course) who went to Catholic high schools/colleges for varying degrees of time and had various unpleasant interactions with affluent-ish white teens who could probably be best described as being properly socialized.  No, really:

    https://www.thecut.com/2019/01/catholic-school-alumni-respond-to-covington-catholic-video.html#_ga=2.139081203.1993663772.1548078220-1873303599.1539095604

    Unsurprisingly, most of the journos and other commentariats writing these lame pieces or melting down on Twitter aren’t the most visually arresting people, to say the least.  I doubt many of them were getting laid on prom night.  I guess what I’m wondering is how much of this is just virtue-signalling schtick/grievance kabuki theater performance art vs. actual emotional trauma/damage from largely benign and typical experiences in their formative/teen years?  Like, how genuinely defective and broken are these people?

    Long, meandering blurb, I know. I’m goofing off at work while writing this. Been reading your stuff for close to ten years, though.

  32. @Hail
    1. Weren't the Minutemen of 1775?

    2. Snorlax: While in broad and nationwide terms Steve's statement is definitely correct, you seem to be disputing that it holds in Massachusetts.

    It depends what we mean by "similar to a Minuteman." I find it improbable, to say the least, that gun-owning and overtly patriotic White-Protestant Massachusetts men who are interested in militias are less likely to vote Republican.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts 'WASPs' (of the whom nearly all the Minutemen will have been), sans qualifications like gun-ownership, are less likely to vote Republican. If this is your claim, what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?

    IOW, who makes up the still-substantial 'R' vote below:

    Massachusetts D-R presidential vote split
    1972: 54-45
    1976: 56-40
    1980: 42-42 (Reagan takes EVs by a tenth of a %)
    1984: 48-51 (Reagan takes EVs)
    1988: 53-45
    1992: 48-37
    1996: 62-28
    2000: 60-33
    2004: 62-37
    2008: 62-36
    2012: 61-38
    2016: 60-33

    (Note that Trump did better than Dole '96 and no worse than any post-Dole Republican, despite worsening racial-political demographics.)

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast:

    https://hailtoyou.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/racialreligiousvote2012.png

    In the NE the most GOP ethnic groups are Scots Irish in the hills and Italians and Orthodox Jews in the cities and suburbs. Also recent East Euro immigrants though they don’t vote in large numbers.

    The old puritan class, if they never changed churches, would be UCC, UU, and independent congregationalists, all ultra left, even compared to other mainline protestant groups.

    I think even this group is moving to the GOP, just from a low base.

    • Replies: @snorlax

    Scots Irish
     
    There are many Scots-Irish in PA and to a lesser extent Upstate NY, but in New England they're either long ago assimilated to WASPhood or transplants from other states.

    Italians
     
    Italians are indeed the most GOP large group.

    Orthodox Jews
     
    Hasidim bloc vote for Rs at the presidential level and for machine Ds (+incumbent Rs) at the state and congressional level. Modern Orthodox are somewhere between Irish+WASPs and Portuguese+French-Canadians in their voting habits.

    recent East Euro immigrants
     
    Secular ex-Soviet Jews may be the most right-wing ethnocultural group in America, and gentile E. Euro immigrants are quite conservative as well, but neither group is large enough to make much of a difference.

    UCC, UU, and independent congregationalists, all ultra left, even compared to other mainline protestant groups.
     
    WASP long ago became more of a cultural than a religious designation, but mainline Protestant churches indeed range from left (Presbyterians and Methodists) to ultra-left (everything else).
  33. @Hail
    1. Weren't the Minutemen of 1775?

    2. Snorlax: While in broad and nationwide terms Steve's statement is definitely correct, you seem to be disputing that it holds in Massachusetts.

    It depends what we mean by "similar to a Minuteman." I find it improbable, to say the least, that gun-owning and overtly patriotic White-Protestant Massachusetts men who are interested in militias are less likely to vote Republican.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts 'WASPs' (of the whom nearly all the Minutemen will have been), sans qualifications like gun-ownership, are less likely to vote Republican. If this is your claim, what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?

    IOW, who makes up the still-substantial 'R' vote below:

    Massachusetts D-R presidential vote split
    1972: 54-45
    1976: 56-40
    1980: 42-42 (Reagan takes EVs by a tenth of a %)
    1984: 48-51 (Reagan takes EVs)
    1988: 53-45
    1992: 48-37
    1996: 62-28
    2000: 60-33
    2004: 62-37
    2008: 62-36
    2012: 61-38
    2016: 60-33

    (Note that Trump did better than Dole '96 and no worse than any post-Dole Republican, despite worsening racial-political demographics.)

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast:

    https://hailtoyou.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/racialreligiousvote2012.png

    “Note that Trump did better than Dole ’96 and no worse than any post-Dole Republican”

    Trump did relatively well in most of the NE and relatively poorly in the very strongly GOP areas of the South and Plains. These areas weren’t competitive so didn’t get the attention of his huge rust belt over performance.

  34. @An Immigrant
    All I can say is that
    "It is just the beginning".
    America's future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    "White man White woman couples" are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    South African whites are tremendously outnumbered. US Whites are not. There are close to 195 million of us. Even accounting for self-hating Whites, there are still well over 100 million.

    If a group that large gets run over by the coalition of the fringes, then it deserves it. For our opponents are not some cohesive, well-oiled machine like conquerors of the past. No, our foes are dregs and degenerates who have little to no martial skills at all.

    Check out the photos sometimes of those reporters and others who blabber about replacing us. Not exactly people to worry about. E.g. check out photos of that Alex chick in a prior post. After seeing her you sort of feel ashamed for having taken her seriously.

    We have the advantage of knowing what is in the hearts and minds of our foes. We have the advantage of facing such a sorry coalition. We have numbers too. If we end up like South African Whites, we will have deserved it.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    '... Even accounting for self-hating Whites, there are still well over 100 million.'

    The bulk of 'self-hating Whites' are simply ideological conformists. They go along with it all because they don't want a fight.

    If we can just wrest control of the pulpit from the politically-correct -- or even just make it clear there is no pulpit -- most of them will come around.

    It's dreadful that this keeps being the analogy, but the situation really is like the Nazis and Germany. They're a small minority -- until they're not. Then once they're in power, everyone will decide they're wonderful after all. Think anyone's going to miss all those homosexuals parading themselves, incompetent affirmative action cadets, and deliberately annoying women?

    I think not. It's going to be like snow melting in May.

    ...this really is the worst aspect of all this. Not only is it ugly, but the reaction won't exactly be pretty to watch either.

    , @Counterinsurgency
    The original idea was that these groups could become like everybody else in the US _if they were given time and tolerance_. That's what T. Roosevelt tried to prevent the US from descending into a "polyglot boarding house", and it seemed (but only seemed) to work, back then c.a. AD 1900.

    This idea of tolerance to give time for adaptation became tolerance for no particular reason ("tolerance" was said by Dobson to be the "chief tolerance of the Christian man", nor reason or function given, back when Focus on the Family was important).

    Then it was changed to "tolerance is oppression", still a duty, but now an offense as well.

    So it wasn't so much fear or even idiocy as it was faith in the government that had won WW II and made the US predominant in world affairs. Genocide, of course, is about the biggest breach possible in the understanding the US citizens had it their Federal Government, and it started early, during the demilitarization push after WW II. People in those years were called the "silent generation" for a reason -- they were made silent. By the 1960s, the silent ones were impersonated by actors (I was there, NYC East Village, Summer of Love. It was crowds and a few actors playing revolutionary, no real revolutionaries at all. Now, the silent ones are replaced by actors, foreign nationals, and groups that can't exist in industrial societies.

    But we're at the end of that, now.

    The town whence came the Catholic kids now realizes that its kids are suddenly no warning, attacked and hurt while trying to conform to the Left's current psychosis. As McDuff says after Maceth kills Macduff's family:
    "He has no children. All my pretty ones?
    Did you say all? O hell-kite! All?
    What, all my pretty chickens and their dam
    At one fell swoop?"
    W. Shakespeare, _Macbeth_, Act 4 Scene 3

    As it was for _Macbeth_, this sort of thing makes opposition that its choices are limited to chaos and watching their children be badly hurt and sometimes killed. Chaos usually wins, no matter the cost.

    Here's what comes next, in mythological terms. Set was, in Egyptian mythology, the spirit of chaos, which underlies everything. Set has been under the discipline of dead social order, has in fact been the chief servant in the House of the Dead, by Anubis, Lord of the Dead, for a millennium. The "father and son" can be taken as "past and future". With those interpretation, it fits our circumstances perfectly.

    Eventually Set (Chaos) realizes that he's been a slave to an order that hates him, and says the following, which Chaos always end up saying to Order, as the silenced generations will say to their silencers:

    You have trained me for a thousand years in the House of the Dead
    that I might kill my son and my father.
    But now you face Set the Destroyer
    and your days are numbered.
    _Creatures of Light and Darkness_, R. Zelzny, 1969.

    And that's what will be said in the USA (slightly edited) at some point in the future, exact time depending on chaotically sourced events.

    Counterinsurgency

    Note: the above is influenced by J. Peterson's interpretation of Egyptian myth. Peterson isn't all impractical fun and games.
    , @Danno
    Absolutely spot on!
    , @S. Anonyia
    Huh? Trump did better than Romney across the entire South, with the exception of Mississippi and Virginia (which can hardly be called Southern nowadays). His gains compared to Romney were especially significant in Florida.

    You're right about underperformance in a bunch of random Western/Plains states though.
  35. @Hail
    1. Weren't the Minutemen of 1775?

    2. Snorlax: While in broad and nationwide terms Steve's statement is definitely correct, you seem to be disputing that it holds in Massachusetts.

    It depends what we mean by "similar to a Minuteman." I find it improbable, to say the least, that gun-owning and overtly patriotic White-Protestant Massachusetts men who are interested in militias are less likely to vote Republican.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts 'WASPs' (of the whom nearly all the Minutemen will have been), sans qualifications like gun-ownership, are less likely to vote Republican. If this is your claim, what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?

    IOW, who makes up the still-substantial 'R' vote below:

    Massachusetts D-R presidential vote split
    1972: 54-45
    1976: 56-40
    1980: 42-42 (Reagan takes EVs by a tenth of a %)
    1984: 48-51 (Reagan takes EVs)
    1988: 53-45
    1992: 48-37
    1996: 62-28
    2000: 60-33
    2004: 62-37
    2008: 62-36
    2012: 61-38
    2016: 60-33

    (Note that Trump did better than Dole '96 and no worse than any post-Dole Republican, despite worsening racial-political demographics.)

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast:

    https://hailtoyou.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/racialreligiousvote2012.png

    While in broad and nationwide terms Steve’s statement is definitely correct

    The Minutemen were Massachusetts-specific.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts ‘WASP,’ sans qualifications like gun-ownership, is less likely to vote Republican.

    Yes. And WASP gun-owners would be less R-voting than other white gun-owners.

    what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?

    Italians, Portuguese and French-Canadians among others. Irish vote more D in the typical D landslides or when a Kennedy is on the ballot, but more R in close and/or R-won elections, and are more conservative on the issues.

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast.

    The Protestant/Catholic difference there is well within the margin of error, and I would say clearly erroneous.

    It’s also out-of-date as pertains to Massachusetts; our WASPs swung extremely hard against Trump and appear to have voted similarly to Jews, Armenians and Hispanics in 2016/8. For example, Dover (MA’s wealthiest town and 56-43 Romney in 2013), which had NEVER voted for a Democrat at the presidential level (it even voted for Goldwater!), went 57-32 Clinton.

    • Replies: @syonredux

    While in broad and nationwide terms Steve’s statement is definitely correct

    The Minutemen were Massachusetts-specific.
     

    Except, as noted above, Steve is using Minuteman as a generic label for men who are White, heterosexual, gun-owning, Christian (esp Protestant), etc.

    Steve did something similar a while back when he talked about how SJW hatred for a given category can be ranked according to how many points in common the group has with James Watt.

    And the Minuteman symbol works pretty well. I mean, talk about bad optics......

    http://www.stevestravelguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Minuteman-Statue-on-Lexington-Battle-Green.jpg

    , @Jack D

    For example, Dover (MA’s wealthiest town and 56-43 Romney in 2013), which had NEVER voted for a Democrat at the presidential level (it even voted for Goldwater!), went 57-32 Clinton.
     
    Trump is somewhat unique in that he is a populist rather than a mainstream GOPe figure. As such, his big appeal is with non-college whites and not with the rich educated whites in a place like Dover. Mass last went Republican in 1984 so it really doesn't make a damn bit of difference how the rich whites of Dover (and by definition there aren't that many rich people to begin with) vote.

    As we saw in the differing Senate vs House results in the recent election, Democrats can flip certain upscale suburban districts by appealing to nice white college educated ladies but this is not enough to flip entire states or the Electoral College. Or at least Trump hopes so.
  36. @Tiny Duck
    What ive learened

    1. conservative whites love playing the victim

    2. conservatives believe in lies and gaslight

    3. conservatives will excuse evil behavior from white children

    4. conservatives are violent and hate filled

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    Thanks TD. It’s good to have things clarified and summarized so adroitly .

    And since I’ve “learened” that the truth is ALWAYS the exact opposite of your spewings, we can confirm that even crazy old TD knows the real truth.

    This is the result of demonizing President Trump. The Dems have spun the narrative that Trump is Hitler/Stalin and therefore NOTHING that comes from Hitler/Stalin could possibly be good, so every single thing he does must be resisted and condemned.

    And all who associate with him, his cabinet, his policies, his family, his friends, his food, his dress, his HATS, his pets, etc. must be shamed, doxed, destroyed.

    Unfortunately, there are a lot of puppet-sheep who have been swayed by the evil of this adopted Alinsky “position” by the criminal left and their minions. It wouldn’t be so bad if these folk were just puppets, or merely sheep, but puppet-sheep are extremely stupid, and highly resistant to truth. Their minds (such as they are) can NEVER be changed by facts.

    Personally, I’ve read “Human Accomplishment”. I KNOW for a FACT that Europeans (aka ‘white folk’) are superior, at least in the vast majority of the type of accomplishments that matter, either in the recent past, or in the 21st century and going forward.

    And yes, when I say ‘white folk’ I do mean predominately ‘white MEN’. (Sorry ladies).

    So all hail white patriarchy!

    And to think that TD led me to this revelation!

  37. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    The key to the whole thing is overturning the central (self-imposed) taboo in American culture and politics: i.e., that Whites shall not be allowed to form a group identity or advocate for their interests, as such.

    This will be very, very difficult due to the ingrained cuckery of most Whites in positions of power. But once a tipping point is reached where even the cowards and careerists are not frightened to treat Whites as just another ethnic group, the whole anti-White edifice will come tumbling down.

    To begin the process, Whites need to wrap their minds around the new paradigm that Legacy Americans are now an embattled minority. The anti-White left fully controls the Media, Hollywood, the Permanent Bureaucracy, Academia, and even the crony capitalist corporations.

    So reject all obsolete sentiments of collective guilt or noblesse oblige. Instead, simply develop a mental immunity to charges of “racism.” No apologizing or virtue signalling that “I am one of the good ones,” and “of course there is real discrimination against marginalized people but . . .”

    If wanting equal treatment is “racist,” then color me “racist.” (Maybe we should own the word like blacks call each other “my nigga.”)

    In terms of forming tactics and strategy, I think a good guideline is to ask ourselves WWJD? — By that, I mean “What Would Jews Do?”

    If someone tries to shame the Jews about their oppression of Palestinians do they cringe and grovel and apologize? Hell no. They go on the offensive and accuse their accuser of “Anti-Semitism.” Legacy Americans likewise need to stay on the offensive against anti-White racism. In addition to being effective, this position has the added benefit of being morally correct.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
    Yep. Standard first move in all insurgencies is control off its own group, with an (shadow) internal police force. That's followed by an external force of some sort -- antifa clones, lawfare, respected commentators, etc At that point the insurgency can support its members when attacked, establish a shadow judiciary, and (in short) become an armed version of Tammany Hall.
    Considerable variation is possible within this framework.
    But first the base population has to want the insurgency. Absent that, recruiting and shadow taxation aren't feasible. We're getting there. Probably arrive after the Democratic white leadership is rejected and the successor groups start competing to be the first to eject all their Whites (as did the NAACP in the AD 1960s and the Women's March much more recently).

    Counterinsurgency
    , @SunBakedSuburb
    Agreed. But this means living in a constant state of racial conflict, which severely interferes with my mellow buzz. Where's that time machine?
  38. @Tiny Duck
    What ive learened

    1. conservative whites love playing the victim

    2. conservatives believe in lies and gaslight

    3. conservatives will excuse evil behavior from white children

    4. conservatives are violent and hate filled

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    ‘What ive learened…’

    My latest theory is that you’re actually on the radical Right and are practising black propaganda. After all, consider ‘6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment.’ Obviously, we’re intended to believe someone from the Left still thinks that.

    The inconsistent misspellings confirm this. You can’t handle ‘I’ve’ but manage to negotiate ‘ultimate punishment’ without a slip?

    I’m skeptical. This is faked, isn’t it?

    • Replies: @keuril

    I’m skeptical. This is faked, isn’t it?
     
    You catch on fast.
    , @Autochthon
    A lot of misspelling around here is down to typographical errors and shitty software automatically "correcting" things because people are using phones and rushed, on bumpy rides in ferries, trains, buses, etc.

    I used to be maddened by the misspellings and such and berate myself when I made such errors, but I'm becoming more resigned to it, sadly.

    The totality of regular commenters' remarks is a good guide to whether they are intelligent and write well and just succumbing to the shitty phone-typing dilemma.

    Tiny Duck, of course, really is either stupid or a parody, but his orthography isn't the proof of it.
  39. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/01/22/donald-trump-pursued-business-deal-russia-hid-voters-editorials-debates/2642773002/

    BOOM goes the dynamite

    This is it. We know have CONCLUSIVE evidence of COLLUSION with Russia. This seals the deal. Trump tried to cut a deal with Russia and HID it from VOTERS. This means IMPEACHMENT

    • Replies: @TheBoom
    TD, I am glad you are ever vigilant. It is sad that few are aware of the role demns played in electing Trump over the required Queen Hillary.
  40. @Chaotic Neutral
    I thought this entire affair was so stupid and obviously a manufactured controversy that I was going to ignore it, but now that the details are out, I think it has a more sinister connotation. What the media and leftists are attempting to do is bully any organized right wing or republican political activism. By showcasing these students on national media and demonizing them, the establishment is exposing them to future leftist harassment and even attack. I’m sure that smirking boy will have less success than comparable students in the college application process now. Perhaps all Covington students will now! There are probably loony leftists apparatchiks at every school just licking their lips with eagerness for their applications to arrive!

    When parents and administrators realize this, they will in the future be reluctant to bring students to rallies or political events realizing the prudence of laying low. It’s sort of like a small scale Charlottesville. Rightist will demur from public demonstration for fear of leftist bullying.

    My child’s Catholic high school sent a contingent to the March for Life as well. It took them a three-day bus ride to get there (my son did not attend, but some of his friends did). The parents I know are more resolved than ever to go back. I think next year will be record attendance as this incident has really struck a chord among our demographic. We all saw our kid in Nick Sandmann

    • Replies: @Mungerite
    Would be quite the troll if Trump came out said “if I had a son, he’d look like Nick Sandmann ...”
  41. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us

    Algerian model. Ugly, painful and tragic, but you can increase the tension on a spring only so far before it gives way.

  42. We should just cut to the chase and have a national referendum: “Yes or No: It shall be the official policy of these United States to disfavor white males for their years of oppression. “ If the vote is yes, the white males who want to stay can make their own decisions.

  43. In contrast, the more similar you are to a Minuteman of 1776, the more likely you are to vote Republican.

    True Dat.

    I would venture that the correlation coefficient between owning a black-powder muzzle loader and voting Republican is 1.00.

  44. @istevefan
    South African whites are tremendously outnumbered. US Whites are not. There are close to 195 million of us. Even accounting for self-hating Whites, there are still well over 100 million.

    If a group that large gets run over by the coalition of the fringes, then it deserves it. For our opponents are not some cohesive, well-oiled machine like conquerors of the past. No, our foes are dregs and degenerates who have little to no martial skills at all.

    Check out the photos sometimes of those reporters and others who blabber about replacing us. Not exactly people to worry about. E.g. check out photos of that Alex chick in a prior post. After seeing her you sort of feel ashamed for having taken her seriously.

    We have the advantage of knowing what is in the hearts and minds of our foes. We have the advantage of facing such a sorry coalition. We have numbers too. If we end up like South African Whites, we will have deserved it.

    ‘… Even accounting for self-hating Whites, there are still well over 100 million.’

    The bulk of ‘self-hating Whites’ are simply ideological conformists. They go along with it all because they don’t want a fight.

    If we can just wrest control of the pulpit from the politically-correct — or even just make it clear there is no pulpit — most of them will come around.

    It’s dreadful that this keeps being the analogy, but the situation really is like the Nazis and Germany. They’re a small minority — until they’re not. Then once they’re in power, everyone will decide they’re wonderful after all. Think anyone’s going to miss all those homosexuals parading themselves, incompetent affirmative action cadets, and deliberately annoying women?

    I think not. It’s going to be like snow melting in May.

    …this really is the worst aspect of all this. Not only is it ugly, but the reaction won’t exactly be pretty to watch either.

  45. @snorlax

    In contrast, the more similar you are to a Minuteman of 1776, the more likely you are to vote Republican.
     
    Uh, no. Source: Am lifelong resident of Massachusetts.

    You are taking his point too literally. I have an ancestor who was a Minuteman and no one in my family line has lived in New England for five generations. Lots of white people outside the Northeast have a similar family history on ancestors moving west.

  46. When the video first came out a lot of conservatives accepted the media’s version without any scepticism. Like Tucker Carlson they want to believe it isn’t really about race. These are the conservatives who post MLK quotes on their Facebook page or were angry at the kid because an Indian was involved. I don’t understand the hand-wringing by conservatives over slavery and the Indians. The Soviets and Chinese killed millions of their own people in the last hundred years while we’re supposed to feel bad about things that happened even further back in our history that weren’t nearly as bad.

    • Replies: @Hail

    I don’t understand the hand-wringing by conservatives over slavery and the Indians
     
    They are not allowed to speak in their own language.

    They must speak in the language of a hostile elite.

    Simple.
    , @Buffalo Joe
    Jean, we should always feel bad about the bad things in our past. However, we do not need to be clubbed over the head daily for those things.
  47. @An Immigrant
    All I can say is that
    "It is just the beginning".
    America's future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    "White man White woman couples" are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    Puerto Rican parasite and all around pest Occasional-Cortex is now calling for reparations for all non-whites because of, wait for it, the New Deal. As if we haven’t poured uncountable billions into Puerto Ricans. Yep, Barry was the beginning of third-world tribal politics in America. Brought to you mainly by all those conservative schmucks who PRETENDED than immigrants we’re only economic units because they were afraid to be called racists by people who desire to exterminate them on a racial basis. I’M NOT AGAINST LE-E-E-GAL IMMIGRATION!

    https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/01/22/ocasio-cortez-compares-americas-past-to-nazi-germany-argues-us-should-pay-reparations-like-they-did-716599?

    Remember, anti-racism is just the con man’s racist colonialism, designed only to give them an excuse to stay close to you so they can rob you. There’s nothing moral about it.

  48. I’ve said it before, but the Black Hebrew Israelites would be really great as a roving gang in a post apocalyptic movie. I’m thinking “Lucifer’s Hammer” on the big screen.

  49. @snorlax

    While in broad and nationwide terms Steve’s statement is definitely correct
     
    The Minutemen were Massachusetts-specific.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts ‘WASP,’ sans qualifications like gun-ownership, is less likely to vote Republican.
     
    Yes. And WASP gun-owners would be less R-voting than other white gun-owners.

    what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?
     
    Italians, Portuguese and French-Canadians among others. Irish vote more D in the typical D landslides or when a Kennedy is on the ballot, but more R in close and/or R-won elections, and are more conservative on the issues.

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast.
     
    The Protestant/Catholic difference there is well within the margin of error, and I would say clearly erroneous.

    It's also out-of-date as pertains to Massachusetts; our WASPs swung extremely hard against Trump and appear to have voted similarly to Jews, Armenians and Hispanics in 2016/8. For example, Dover (MA's wealthiest town and 56-43 Romney in 2013), which had NEVER voted for a Democrat at the presidential level (it even voted for Goldwater!), went 57-32 Clinton.

    While in broad and nationwide terms Steve’s statement is definitely correct

    The Minutemen were Massachusetts-specific.

    Except, as noted above, Steve is using Minuteman as a generic label for men who are White, heterosexual, gun-owning, Christian (esp Protestant), etc.

    Steve did something similar a while back when he talked about how SJW hatred for a given category can be ranked according to how many points in common the group has with James Watt.

    And the Minuteman symbol works pretty well. I mean, talk about bad optics……

    • Replies: @Jake
    Except that by then the average New Englander of pure WASP stock was fully a heretic of the worst sort and already given to backing almost all crazy Liberal notions in cultural and political matters as long as they were not seen as being imposed by non-New Englanders of pure WASP stock.
  50. Really outstanding analysis.

  51. Identity Stalinism or Totalitarian Inclusivity?

    The globalizer JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire wants to smash the crud out of the European Christian ancestral core of the United States in order to atomize and splinter any cohesive force strong enough to resist the machinations of the ruling class.

    White Core America stands alone as the last holdout to the globalizer’s plan to make every man or woman bow down to their evil overlordship.

    These filth mugs in the ruling class are kept in power by electronics. How so?

    Electronic propaganda and an electronic currency.

    The evil JEW/WASP ruling class uses its control of the electronic propaganda to distract and manage the opinion of the American public.

    The evil JEW/WASP ruling class uses an electronic currency conjured up out of thin air to keep the asset bubbles in stocks, bonds and real estate inflated. This is a tactic designed to buy off certain generational cohorts to keep them quiet about the anti-White policies that the ruling class pushes.

    There is a reason that the mass immigration law in 1965 was followed by the repudiation of the gold standard in 1971.

    Pewitt Says:

    Identity Stalinism is better than Totalitarian Inclusivity. It is better sounding and more ominous to rant about Identity Stalinism and more fun.

    Politics has boiled down to this:

    Mass Immigration and Monetary Policy

    or,

    Demography and Debt

  52. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    The late Lawrence Auster’s First Law of Majority-Minority Relations and it’s corollary:

    The worse any designated minority or alien group behaves in a liberal society, the bigger become the lies of Political Correctess in covering up for that group.
    ……

    That last point leads us to the first corollary of Auster’s First Law of Majority/Minority Relations in Liberal Society: The more egregiously any non-Western or non-white group behaves, the more evil whites are made to appear for noticing and drawing rational conclusions about that group’s bad behavior.

    The First Law and its corollary are intrinsic to liberalism. Once the equality of all human groups is accepted as a given, any facts that make a minority or foreign group seem worse than the majority native group must be either covered up or blamed on the majority.

  53. @YetAnotherAnon

    "If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say “enough is enough!” what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time the media uses normal reactions by whites as evidence against us."
     

    Welcome to the dilemma faced by patriotic parties/movements in the UK like the BNP or EDL (or even UKIP). Attacks on you will be ignored by the media if serious injury is caused, if you're chased down the street with things being thrown it'll be used as proof of your unpopularity.

    If you stand your ground and fight (as EDL often do when attacked), or even if you don't, the headlines will read "35 arrested as trouble flares at EDL march" - even if every one of those 35 people is a left winger, and the local press will say "their hate-filled marches bring trouble to our streets" - half-true, but highly misleading because all the trouble comes from the other side.

    If someone finally has enough and goes postal like Thomas Mair - who killed his local Labour MP in the UK - stand by for the canonisation of the victim and 24/7 coverage. If someone like Theo Van Gogh is killed - well, he was asking for it, wasn't he?

    PS - OT, but this is very iSteve

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/oracle-owes-400m-to-women-black-asian-workers-dol-says

    "Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing."

    But, but, but, Trump isn’t doing anything!- scream the blackpilled douchebags.

  54. @Lot
    In the NE the most GOP ethnic groups are Scots Irish in the hills and Italians and Orthodox Jews in the cities and suburbs. Also recent East Euro immigrants though they don't vote in large numbers.

    The old puritan class, if they never changed churches, would be UCC, UU, and independent congregationalists, all ultra left, even compared to other mainline protestant groups.

    I think even this group is moving to the GOP, just from a low base.

    Scots Irish

    There are many Scots-Irish in PA and to a lesser extent Upstate NY, but in New England they’re either long ago assimilated to WASPhood or transplants from other states.

    Italians

    Italians are indeed the most GOP large group.

    Orthodox Jews

    Hasidim bloc vote for Rs at the presidential level and for machine Ds (+incumbent Rs) at the state and congressional level. Modern Orthodox are somewhere between Irish+WASPs and Portuguese+French-Canadians in their voting habits.

    recent East Euro immigrants

    Secular ex-Soviet Jews may be the most right-wing ethnocultural group in America, and gentile E. Euro immigrants are quite conservative as well, but neither group is large enough to make much of a difference.

    UCC, UU, and independent congregationalists, all ultra left, even compared to other mainline protestant groups.

    WASP long ago became more of a cultural than a religious designation, but mainline Protestant churches indeed range from left (Presbyterians and Methodists) to ultra-left (everything else).

    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt

    There are many Scots-Irish in PA and to a lesser extent Upstate NY, but in New England they’re either long ago assimilated to WASPhood or transplants from other states.

     

    The Scotch-Irish founded Derry and Londonderry and Antrim in New Hampshire. I could be wrong, doubt it though!

    We be no Irish, we're Scoatch!

    New Hampshire is the Tennessee of New England.

    New Hampshire has a race track used for NASCAR races.

    Londonderry, the Scots-Irish mother town, spawned new settlements in New Hampshire. According to one estimate, the Scots-Irish made up 10 percent of New Hampshire’s population in the 18th century.

     

    http://www.newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/how-scots-irish-came-to-america-and-what-they-brought-with-them/
    , @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    I am 1/4th Scotch-Irish, and 3/4ths German. I am also the 9th generation in my family to live in my part of rural PA. My family, thanks be to God, is much more rooted than most Americans. I may have to move away someday, though.

    My blood is pretty much the standard for a rural south-central Pennsylvanian.

    There were three main waves of immigrants into the rural agricultural parts of Pennsylvania: the Scotch-Irish; followed about the same time or slightly later by various German-speaking groups; followed in the 1800s by a second and distinct German migration. The second wave of German immigrants, which was the largest across America, was more broadly taken from throughout Germany, whereas the first group was - the true Pennsylvania Dutch - were from the southwest of Germany. There were sprinklings of English around here too. The industrial areas of PA got vastly different ethnic groups, of course.

    The Scotch-Irish here are totally assimilated into Pennsylvania culture.

    The difference is that Pennsylvania culture isn't liberal WASP New England culture.

    I don't know enough off the top of my head to examine this distinction further.

    However! I do think there are/were FAR less Scotch-Irish in New England, historically, than there were/are in the South and Midwest. The single largest port of entry for Scotch-Irish was Philadelphia, followed by New York and the Southern ports, with Boston/New England WAAAAAAY behind.

  55. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    Partly virtue signalling and going along with the “in” crowd. Entertainment figures, especially female, always want to be on the side that is popular. They are like dogs who are attuned to pleasing (or manipulating) their masters in order to earn their living.

    And partly that no one wants to be seen as the first to stop clapping for Stalin. If you are not loudly clapping yourself, then maybe we have some reason to be suspicious of you? Maybe you are not really down with the Revolution? Maybe you once said something that could be taken as praise of a white person? We should check into this.

    But as long as you are clapping along with the others, the eye of Soros will have no reason to focus its gaze on you. You hope. So keep clapping.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    This is so obviously wrong that it shouldn't be necessary to bring up Wokebusters. Entertainment in the US is not free at all, it is very highly centralized and tightly controlled. Where people mistakenly expect a market there's manufactured outrage and deplatforming.
  56. I think what you say here Steve…

    As these examples from the weekend suggest, the only way the Democratic Party can hold together is by constantly ginning up excuses for Fringe Americans to hate Core Americans even more than they hate each other.

    is correct up to a point because we have to take into account Married Suburban White Women and Unmarried Childless Urban Career Women.

    Despite the aformentioned internecine warfare in the Democratic party, those two groups are locked down — especially in 2020 when Trump runs again.

    The first group hates the Donald because all their girlfriends at the daycare center think he’s a mean bully, and pack thinking is the norm. Plus the bad Orange Man reminds them of the rich lothario who pumped and dumped them, and left them with their Beta schlub in the 3-bedroom ranch.

    The second group has the same pack attitude, plus the younger rich guys pumping and dumping them currnetly on the free-sex carousel remind them of a younger DJT.

    Trump can still win, but as the midterms have told us, it will be a struggle.

    • Replies: @Redman
    Wow. This is totally true. I live in a well to do NY suburb. And the married women (all of them) here want to see Trump castrated.

    They also control the suburban dialogue worse than an Orwellian censor. They have recently started putting up lawn signs everywhere that say “Hate Has No Home Here” all over town. The signs look remarkably similar to Obama/HRC signs in color and design.

    These gals are powerful.
  57. @snorlax

    Scots Irish
     
    There are many Scots-Irish in PA and to a lesser extent Upstate NY, but in New England they're either long ago assimilated to WASPhood or transplants from other states.

    Italians
     
    Italians are indeed the most GOP large group.

    Orthodox Jews
     
    Hasidim bloc vote for Rs at the presidential level and for machine Ds (+incumbent Rs) at the state and congressional level. Modern Orthodox are somewhere between Irish+WASPs and Portuguese+French-Canadians in their voting habits.

    recent East Euro immigrants
     
    Secular ex-Soviet Jews may be the most right-wing ethnocultural group in America, and gentile E. Euro immigrants are quite conservative as well, but neither group is large enough to make much of a difference.

    UCC, UU, and independent congregationalists, all ultra left, even compared to other mainline protestant groups.
     
    WASP long ago became more of a cultural than a religious designation, but mainline Protestant churches indeed range from left (Presbyterians and Methodists) to ultra-left (everything else).

    There are many Scots-Irish in PA and to a lesser extent Upstate NY, but in New England they’re either long ago assimilated to WASPhood or transplants from other states.

    The Scotch-Irish founded Derry and Londonderry and Antrim in New Hampshire. I could be wrong, doubt it though!

    We be no Irish, we’re Scoatch!

    New Hampshire is the Tennessee of New England.

    New Hampshire has a race track used for NASCAR races.

    Londonderry, the Scots-Irish mother town, spawned new settlements in New Hampshire. According to one estimate, the Scots-Irish made up 10 percent of New Hampshire’s population in the 18th century.

    http://www.newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/how-scots-irish-came-to-america-and-what-they-brought-with-them/

  58. TODAY (!) from the NYT:

    Videos Show a Collision of 3 Groups That Spawned a Fiery Political Moment

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/22/us/covington-catholic-washington-videos.html

    From the comments:

    “What kind of supposedly religious school let’s their students wear regalia very strongly associated with white supremicism to an official school event? ”

    “I don’t understand the people who claim that MAGA isn’t racist. Thanks to new MAGA policies, we have thousands of children and babies locked up in concentration camps along our border. Most of these kids will never recover from the trauma of being separated from their family. Lifelong issues with trust and love.”

    “Seriously, I’d tend to vote for Nathan Phillips as president. We need more Americans like him.”

    “No matter how many times, from several angles, I view the video footage, the boys are still the worst behaved in the crowd. All identifiable “mockers” should be immediately expelled from their school.”

    “I saw nothing improper among the gatherings of the Indigenous Peoples’ March nor of the Israelites’ gathering. The teens were disgustingly biased, insulting, and totally out of control….. ”

    “It is clear that most of the blame can be attributed to the chaperones who should have kept their students under control. How did they allow their students to make such a scene. Sure the others in this exaggerated non-event bear some of the blame but the adult chaperones should have know better.”

    “Nathan Phillips, a Native American male, was and is the hero in this event.”

    Some comments defend the boys, most comments put most of the blame on the boys.

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    Well, it is the New York Times. Not exactly a neutral sample.
  59. @An Immigrant
    All I can say is that
    "It is just the beginning".
    America's future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    "White man White woman couples" are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    Paraguay actually did outlaw white-white marriage in the nineteenth century but it didn’t stick.

  60. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    Possibly left wing directors acquire a reputation for giving out roles to left wing starlets. Or previous starlets in her case.

  61. @Charles Erwin Wilson 3
    Gandhi faced the British, a fundamentally moral people. Do you think that is what we face with the Left?

    You don’t have to win with Leftists. You are never going to win with Leftists. If it was up to Leftists, Hillary Clinton would be President or maybe even Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would be Presidente for Life. But that’s not who you have to win with. You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That’s why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That’s why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.
     
    LOL. Hillary won the popular vote. The Electoral College is why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.
  62. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    Simply continue to exist and behave with dignity. Above all have babies. Just our continued existence is a provocation. Refuse to give in to despair and maintain a standard of behavior for your children to emulate instead of Richard spencer juvenilia.

  63. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    Can someone fill me in about when and why entertainers started pontificating about politics? Is it Bob Dylan’s fault? Seems to be a very Western thing. I can’t imagine Jackie Chan talking about the latest five year plan and being taken seriously.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Actor John Wilkes Booth had strong political views.
    , @dfordoom

    Can someone fill me in about when and why entertainers started pontificating about politics?
     
    By the 1930s Hollywood actors were incredibly politicised. Most of course were communists or (even worse) liberals.
  64. @snorlax

    While in broad and nationwide terms Steve’s statement is definitely correct
     
    The Minutemen were Massachusetts-specific.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts ‘WASP,’ sans qualifications like gun-ownership, is less likely to vote Republican.
     
    Yes. And WASP gun-owners would be less R-voting than other white gun-owners.

    what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?
     
    Italians, Portuguese and French-Canadians among others. Irish vote more D in the typical D landslides or when a Kennedy is on the ballot, but more R in close and/or R-won elections, and are more conservative on the issues.

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast.
     
    The Protestant/Catholic difference there is well within the margin of error, and I would say clearly erroneous.

    It's also out-of-date as pertains to Massachusetts; our WASPs swung extremely hard against Trump and appear to have voted similarly to Jews, Armenians and Hispanics in 2016/8. For example, Dover (MA's wealthiest town and 56-43 Romney in 2013), which had NEVER voted for a Democrat at the presidential level (it even voted for Goldwater!), went 57-32 Clinton.

    For example, Dover (MA’s wealthiest town and 56-43 Romney in 2013), which had NEVER voted for a Democrat at the presidential level (it even voted for Goldwater!), went 57-32 Clinton.

    Trump is somewhat unique in that he is a populist rather than a mainstream GOPe figure. As such, his big appeal is with non-college whites and not with the rich educated whites in a place like Dover. Mass last went Republican in 1984 so it really doesn’t make a damn bit of difference how the rich whites of Dover (and by definition there aren’t that many rich people to begin with) vote.

    As we saw in the differing Senate vs House results in the recent election, Democrats can flip certain upscale suburban districts by appealing to nice white college educated ladies but this is not enough to flip entire states or the Electoral College. Or at least Trump hopes so.

    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
    Trump is somewhat unique in that he is a populist rather than a mainstream GOPe figure. As such, his big appeal is with non-college whites and not with the rich educated whites in a place like Dover.

    Trump won among college-educated Whites.
  65. @YetAnotherAnon

    "If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say “enough is enough!” what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time the media uses normal reactions by whites as evidence against us."
     

    Welcome to the dilemma faced by patriotic parties/movements in the UK like the BNP or EDL (or even UKIP). Attacks on you will be ignored by the media if serious injury is caused, if you're chased down the street with things being thrown it'll be used as proof of your unpopularity.

    If you stand your ground and fight (as EDL often do when attacked), or even if you don't, the headlines will read "35 arrested as trouble flares at EDL march" - even if every one of those 35 people is a left winger, and the local press will say "their hate-filled marches bring trouble to our streets" - half-true, but highly misleading because all the trouble comes from the other side.

    If someone finally has enough and goes postal like Thomas Mair - who killed his local Labour MP in the UK - stand by for the canonisation of the victim and 24/7 coverage. If someone like Theo Van Gogh is killed - well, he was asking for it, wasn't he?

    PS - OT, but this is very iSteve

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/oracle-owes-400m-to-women-black-asian-workers-dol-says

    "Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing."

    “Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing.”

    Yes, this is very iSteve, and I have to guess he will do a post on it when he gets a chance.

    The Complaint filed by the DOL is interesting due to its internal incoherence and its mangling of statistics. Basically, it says that Oracle prefers Asians, who make up 75 percent of its workforce. Yet Oracle is supposedly also discriminating against Asians because, on average, they make 4% less pay than the 25% of the workforce which is white.

    The Complaint also bizarrely alleges discrimination against “women,” without noting how many women are Asian vs. White. This completely confuses their race and gender arguments.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    I'm surprised that the DoL is still running anti-business suits like this under Trump - it shows how little influence he has on the Permanent Government. On the surface this is pure Leftism - woman and blacks and Hispanics are being discriminated against, once again.

    But, if you look deeper, the anti-H1B angle is Trumpish. Once you brush aside the internal inconsistencies in their logic (they are discriminating against Asians by hiring them) the bottom line is that they want Oracle to hire more American citizens and fewer visa holders.

    The corporate greed at Oracle has clearly gotten out of hand and they deserve to be slapped back. It's one thing to hire a few H1B's to cut your average cost and it's another to hire NOTHING BUT H1B's. 9 out of 10 of their hires were H1B's. Typically when S. Asians take over an IT dept they only hire their fellow S. Asians in the future. It doesn't occur to them to do otherwise - NATURALLY you favor your own people. Only whites are altruistic.

    , @Travis
    the entire H1B visa program needs to be abolished because it discriminates against women...Those running the INS must be held accountable and prosecuted for their sexist program which grants 75% of the H1B visas to men. It is surprising than none of the female candidates running for President has held the INS accountable for their blatant sexism.
  66. I wonder if Mark’s sister would be willing to acknowledge that the racial and intellectual connection of modern Europeans to Greece and Rome is far more direct and better documented both in texts and archaeology than is the connection of Israelis to Israelites.

    Jews have really tried to legitimized their possession of most of Palestine by digging up proof that something resembling the Kingdom of David and Solomon actually once existed. But they haven’t found much, if anything.

    Kind of starting to seem like the history parts of the Hebrew Bible were composed more to legitimize then current governance than to record what actually happened and when.

    So they’re turning up the heat on Western Civilization. Every couple of days, there’s a new article denouncing any belief in a racial and intellectual tradition underlying Western Civ. They are projecting their own sense of phoniness onto us.

  67. @njguy73
    First, in October, there was the Filipino-Italian bodybuilding male stripper who sent suspicious packages.

    Now, The Smirk Seen Around The World.

    I'm starting to think that in May of 2018, Philip Roth and Tom Wolfe did not die. They got together and merged into one being, a being which ascended to a higher plane of existence and which now uses the human race to make up stories for their own amusement.

    But if it was Philip Roth then a white Christian would be traveling killing Jews just because they are Jewish and police would do nothing because of some sexual anxiety.

  68. @Tiny Duck
    What ive learened

    1. conservative whites love playing the victim

    2. conservatives believe in lies and gaslight

    3. conservatives will excuse evil behavior from white children

    4. conservatives are violent and hate filled

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    As you can see, TD pretty much says that he can’t live in an industrial society — grates on his nerves too much. CG&LoE looks better than that.

    Counterinsurgency

  69. @njguy73
    First, in October, there was the Filipino-Italian bodybuilding male stripper who sent suspicious packages.

    Now, The Smirk Seen Around The World.

    I'm starting to think that in May of 2018, Philip Roth and Tom Wolfe did not die. They got together and merged into one being, a being which ascended to a higher plane of existence and which now uses the human race to make up stories for their own amusement.

    “(…) which now uses the human race to make up stories for their own amusement.”

    Which means what: That poor me, being undoubtedly not one person glued together from the better halfes of a genius (Wolfe) and an at times impressive writer (the other one, you mention above) – as I say: Being only me, I have a good excuse to be not that amused about what’s going on here. I find it quite troubling, I have to admit. And Jonathan Haidt’s Heterodox Academy one of the good answers (Steve Sailer’s on the spot dissections of these modern times conundrums working as an immediate pain killer – the victory lap is well deserved).

    (In small letters – very small ones: What about the new book, Mr. Sailer? Does it grow? It needn’t become that big. Even 200+ p. would do nicely! title: Identity Stalinism)

    • Replies: @njguy73
    My point is that real life is turning into one big postmodern novel filled with characters like Rev. Reggie Bacon, Charlotte Simmons, Officer Nestor Camacho, Professor Coleman Silk, and Swede Levov.
  70. @Tiny Duck
    What ive learened

    1. conservative whites love playing the victim

    2. conservatives believe in lies and gaslight

    3. conservatives will excuse evil behavior from white children

    4. conservatives are violent and hate filled

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    Give me a break.

  71. All-girl Gawker reboot attempt founders because three chicks cannot be counted on to not fight.
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/gawker-writers-quit-over-editorial-director-carson-griffiths-offensive-tweets-workplace-comments/

    The two also told HR that they were particularly disturbed when Griffith commented in the small Gawker office that it may be difficult to hire writers of color because, in her estimation, people of color prefer to only write serious pieces about race.

    This grievance opera makes the case against Captain Queeg look like the case against Leopold and Loeb. At one point Griffith jokes that she has the habits of a poor person, which, instead of being taken as self-deprecating, was taken as hating poor people.

    • Replies: @anon
    Carson Griffith is too blonde.

    Also she doesn't get that bosses can't be one of the girls in a hopeless woke place.
  72. @Hypnotoad666

    How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?
     
    The key to the whole thing is overturning the central (self-imposed) taboo in American culture and politics: i.e., that Whites shall not be allowed to form a group identity or advocate for their interests, as such.

    This will be very, very difficult due to the ingrained cuckery of most Whites in positions of power. But once a tipping point is reached where even the cowards and careerists are not frightened to treat Whites as just another ethnic group, the whole anti-White edifice will come tumbling down.

    To begin the process, Whites need to wrap their minds around the new paradigm that Legacy Americans are now an embattled minority. The anti-White left fully controls the Media, Hollywood, the Permanent Bureaucracy, Academia, and even the crony capitalist corporations.

    So reject all obsolete sentiments of collective guilt or noblesse oblige. Instead, simply develop a mental immunity to charges of "racism." No apologizing or virtue signalling that "I am one of the good ones," and "of course there is real discrimination against marginalized people but . . ."

    If wanting equal treatment is "racist," then color me "racist." (Maybe we should own the word like blacks call each other "my nigga.")

    In terms of forming tactics and strategy, I think a good guideline is to ask ourselves WWJD? -- By that, I mean "What Would Jews Do?"

    If someone tries to shame the Jews about their oppression of Palestinians do they cringe and grovel and apologize? Hell no. They go on the offensive and accuse their accuser of "Anti-Semitism." Legacy Americans likewise need to stay on the offensive against anti-White racism. In addition to being effective, this position has the added benefit of being morally correct.

    Yep. Standard first move in all insurgencies is control off its own group, with an (shadow) internal police force. That’s followed by an external force of some sort — antifa clones, lawfare, respected commentators, etc At that point the insurgency can support its members when attacked, establish a shadow judiciary, and (in short) become an armed version of Tammany Hall.
    Considerable variation is possible within this framework.
    But first the base population has to want the insurgency. Absent that, recruiting and shadow taxation aren’t feasible. We’re getting there. Probably arrive after the Democratic white leadership is rejected and the successor groups start competing to be the first to eject all their Whites (as did the NAACP in the AD 1960s and the Women’s March much more recently).

    Counterinsurgency

  73. @Hypnotoad666

    “Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing.”
     
    Yes, this is very iSteve, and I have to guess he will do a post on it when he gets a chance.

    The Complaint filed by the DOL is interesting due to its internal incoherence and its mangling of statistics. Basically, it says that Oracle prefers Asians, who make up 75 percent of its workforce. Yet Oracle is supposedly also discriminating against Asians because, on average, they make 4% less pay than the 25% of the workforce which is white.

    The Complaint also bizarrely alleges discrimination against "women," without noting how many women are Asian vs. White. This completely confuses their race and gender arguments.

    I’m surprised that the DoL is still running anti-business suits like this under Trump – it shows how little influence he has on the Permanent Government. On the surface this is pure Leftism – woman and blacks and Hispanics are being discriminated against, once again.

    But, if you look deeper, the anti-H1B angle is Trumpish. Once you brush aside the internal inconsistencies in their logic (they are discriminating against Asians by hiring them) the bottom line is that they want Oracle to hire more American citizens and fewer visa holders.

    The corporate greed at Oracle has clearly gotten out of hand and they deserve to be slapped back. It’s one thing to hire a few H1B’s to cut your average cost and it’s another to hire NOTHING BUT H1B’s. 9 out of 10 of their hires were H1B’s. Typically when S. Asians take over an IT dept they only hire their fellow S. Asians in the future. It doesn’t occur to them to do otherwise – NATURALLY you favor your own people. Only whites are altruistic.

    • Agree: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @TWS
    It's past time someone put their foot down. We cannot have falling wages yet need more immigrants.
  74. OT: An arrest has been made of a suspect in the rape and impregnation of that poor woman in Phoenix. Looks like a black israelite. By the way, I happen also to be a nurse in the Phoenix area (a hospital, not a nursing care home) and black males represent maybe 2% of the nurses employed at my facility. To be honest I was expecting the guy to be Hispanic. At any rate, I wonder how much interest there will be in reporting this in the national media.

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/23/health/arizona-woman-birth-vegetative-state/index.html

  75. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    Young Alyssa Milano? Maybe. Aging Alyssa? Hmmm.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Walsh2
    There's no maybe to it, she was hot. When a leftist harpy insipidly yammers about on twitter I increase the toxicity of my masculinity by doing a google image search and including "topless" in the search. She was smoking.
    , @The preferred nomenclature is...
    Wow, she has not aged well. Neither has Ashley Judd. All that real hate is obviously not good for you. She has that dead eye look of a mass murderer.
    , @Johnny789
    I noticed yesterday that the same downgrading of looks thing has happened to Debra Messing. Isn't there an aphorism of some sort about being careful or else your face will permanently freeze in that nastiness that you project to the world.
  76. @snorlax

    In contrast, the more similar you are to a Minuteman of 1776, the more likely you are to vote Republican.
     
    Uh, no. Source: Am lifelong resident of Massachusetts.

    No. Current Left coalition is Yankees and NYC, just as it was during the Civil War. Yankees and NYC dominated California cities after the American annexation, so the Left Coast is also in the Left coalition.
    If you want confirmation, try arguing with a Unitarian about politics. He (or she or it) won’t even reply, most times. Or with a New Yorker, although that’s a bit more physically risky.

    Counterinsurgency

  77. @snorlax

    In contrast, the more similar you are to a Minuteman of 1776, the more likely you are to vote Republican.
     
    Uh, no. Source: Am lifelong resident of Massachusetts.

    Sailer’s sentence makes sense. He specifically likens contemporary Republicans (as opposed to Democrats) to Revolutionary War Minutemen in demographic similarity—i.e. white, male, pro-gun.

    • Agree: syonredux
  78. @Hail
    1. Weren't the Minutemen of 1775?

    2. Snorlax: While in broad and nationwide terms Steve's statement is definitely correct, you seem to be disputing that it holds in Massachusetts.

    It depends what we mean by "similar to a Minuteman." I find it improbable, to say the least, that gun-owning and overtly patriotic White-Protestant Massachusetts men who are interested in militias are less likely to vote Republican.

    You must be arguing a softer version of this, namely that as an ethnocultural group, the Massachusetts 'WASPs' (of the whom nearly all the Minutemen will have been), sans qualifications like gun-ownership, are less likely to vote Republican. If this is your claim, what groups in your experience are more likely to vote R?

    IOW, who makes up the still-substantial 'R' vote below:

    Massachusetts D-R presidential vote split
    1972: 54-45
    1976: 56-40
    1980: 42-42 (Reagan takes EVs by a tenth of a %)
    1984: 48-51 (Reagan takes EVs)
    1988: 53-45
    1992: 48-37
    1996: 62-28
    2000: 60-33
    2004: 62-37
    2008: 62-36
    2012: 61-38
    2016: 60-33

    (Note that Trump did better than Dole '96 and no worse than any post-Dole Republican, despite worsening racial-political demographics.)

    In Nov. 2012, I used Reuters polling data to find the vote by race and religion; here is the large-n result for the Northeast:

    https://hailtoyou.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/racialreligiousvote2012.png

    1. Weren’t the Minutemen of 1775?

    That is the significant date. Rare oversight by Steve. I’m disappointed he’s not making a point to read every single one of my comments. 🙂

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    No, it's totally reasonable to use the number 1776 to generally represent the Revolution.
    , @Hail
    Few may now remember The Minutemen of 2005, designated by some a revival of the 1990s right-wing militia movement, and certainly with undertones thereof at the least. They were a self-appointed civilian auxiliary to the border patrol.

    Not sure what happened to them. They were subject to nonstop hate-based attacks.

    They emerged right at an opportune time, the period o "peak amnesty risk" (the high water mark of which, IMO, was May 2006) and deserve a mention in any history of the Defeat of Amnesty of that era.

  79. @Jack D
    You don't have to win with Leftists. You are never going to win with Leftists. If it was up to Leftists, Hillary Clinton would be President or maybe even Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would be Presidente for Life. But that's not who you have to win with. You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That's why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That’s why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    LOL. Hillary won the popular vote. The Electoral College is why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    Then thank Allah for the Electoral College, because Hillary was Baal's choice.
    , @Counterinsurgency

    Hillary won the popular vote
     
    Right. So why didn't that translate to the Supreme Executive Power that HC wanted?

    Well, because the Electoral College is the way it is for a reason. People who occupy territory have more on the ground power than do people who don't. The majority vote that Hillary got was from foreign nationals and, to be blunt, vote theft. See what that buys you in a non-electoral process.

    What it comes to is that cities are now islands in a countryside that has rejected them. The cities have no economic importance other than finance, and are in fact unable to so much as maintain their capital plant. They are, moreover, about the only concentrated targets for foreign enemy the US has [1].

    If things come to a serious contest, your side is toast. The Left are fools to rely on violence; it's the one area where they can't compete. This Catholic school business -- the Left has graduated from political violence to terrorism, targeting children _who were playing stupid games assigned them by a Left teacher_. Terrorism unleashes chaos, and you now are the establishment: chaos isn't your friend.

    Counterinsurgency
    1] Copley.
    _Uncivilization_.
    , @Cloudbuster
    Your point? That has always been the rule. Trump won over the right Americans in the right places, not vast numbers of redundant votes in CA. That's how we do it in the USA.
    , @Paul Yarbles
    Did Trump spend a lot of effort winning the votes of Californians? Why not?
    , @ChrisZ
    Jenner, what you say is true and sobering, as usual. But I think you’re avoiding Jack’s point. The goal is not conversion of the enemy, but marginalization.

    Leftists are mostly pussies, but since 2008 they’ve been emboldened by a belief that they have become numerically superior in America. With perceived numbers on their side, and thus (in a mass society) a measure of invulnerability, they’ve gone the route of all weak people who suddenly find themselves with unmerited power: they’ve become martinets and bullies.

    The true believers and drivers on the Left are still not numerically a majority (at least that’s my impression). But the trouble is that most regular people are mere followers and easily cowed into submission and acquiescence, so they go along with whoever is dominant in the culture. For most of them, it was only the advent of Trump that clued them into the fact that there were people who were willing to say “F-you” to the Left.

    Our side needs to detach enough of those “followers” from the Left, capture them for our own side, and (this is key) re-jigger the system to permanently diminish and weaken the fringers. That’s going to be difficult, and possibly futile at this point. But I pray it’s within the realm of possibility—and events like this weekend’s fiasco are a glimmer of hope that some “followers” are waking up.
    , @MBlanc46
    Hello, Jenner! The electoral college is how US presidents are elected. There is no other way. Ms Clinton didn’t get elected to anything.
  80. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    I understand the clickbait interns’ incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    She’s only a celebrity if she stays in the public eye. Being woke is one way of doing that, in addition to gratifying her ego as being one of the good people.

  81. Jew commits a crime depending on manipulation
    HIS JEWISHNESS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT
    Muslim terrorist spreads diversity at a winter public gathering
    HIS ISLAM HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT
    Haitian “refugee” male nurse rapes mentally challened quadriplegic woman, who becomes pregnant
    SUSPECT WAS A DEVOUT CHRISTIAN
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6623669/Nurse-36-arrested-suspicion-raping-mentally-challenged-quadriplegic-patient.html

  82. @Tiny Duck
    What ive learened

    1. conservative whites love playing the victim

    2. conservatives believe in lies and gaslight

    3. conservatives will excuse evil behavior from white children

    4. conservatives are violent and hate filled

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    I know there is a lot of debate as to the nature of Tiny Duck. Is he for real? There are leftists who are really that stupid. On the other hand, given how over the top he is, some people figure he just has to be a put-on.

    That aside, just looking at he wrote there above – didn’t he just call for a bunch of High School students to be put to death? Is that kind of post allowed here? Are there any consequences for that?

  83. @Jack D
    Partly virtue signalling and going along with the "in" crowd. Entertainment figures, especially female, always want to be on the side that is popular. They are like dogs who are attuned to pleasing (or manipulating) their masters in order to earn their living.

    And partly that no one wants to be seen as the first to stop clapping for Stalin. If you are not loudly clapping yourself, then maybe we have some reason to be suspicious of you? Maybe you are not really down with the Revolution? Maybe you once said something that could be taken as praise of a white person? We should check into this.

    But as long as you are clapping along with the others, the eye of Soros will have no reason to focus its gaze on you. You hope. So keep clapping.

    This is so obviously wrong that it shouldn’t be necessary to bring up Wokebusters. Entertainment in the US is not free at all, it is very highly centralized and tightly controlled. Where people mistakenly expect a market there’s manufactured outrage and deplatforming.

  84. @Jack D
    You play it just like those white boys did - you don't take the bait, you don't fall for the provocation. Yes, they were condemned anyway in the short run but (and this is driving the Left even more wild) in the longer cycle they won the confrontation. Nothing will change the mind of the most extreme, out of touch with reality Leftists but most reasonable people now understand that the initial picture presented of evil whites who might as well have been wearing KKK hoods and robes was not truthful - at a minimum the situation was "more complicated". Each time one of these hate hoaxes is perpetrated and then turns out to be a dud, it diminishes the impact of the tactic. Yes, the media keeps trying to memory hole them, but ordinary people are not idiots and remember and take media accounts nowadays with a grain of salt.

    Now the media keeps trying to flip the script and tell us that white teenagers from the sticks are really the "privileged" so that it is ok to punch "up" at them (while billionaires are the "oppressed") but people are not going to accept such topsy-turvy thinking in the long run. And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked - the way to gain sympathy is to maintain the high ground and make the bully look bad.

    And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked …

    As Mr. Wilson replied already, Ghandi was dealing with the British, a much more civilized people at the time than the modern ctrl-left. That sounds like idiotic advice in general – would you tell your boys that, Jack? No, you need to bloody up the bully’s nose right away. I think I will not read any more Gandhi for advice. He sounds like a ‘tard, who just had the power of numbers behind him.

    Don’t read this the wrong way – I don’t mean that kid should have punched out that Indian, as good as it would have felt, I’m sure. He did a good job remaining calm, and nobody did him or his schoolmates any physical violence. They need to come down on anyone who has libeled or threatened them with some legal action, for starters.

  85. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    1. Weren’t the Minutemen of 1775?
     
    That is the significant date. Rare oversight by Steve. I’m disappointed he’s not making a point to read every single one of my comments. :)

    No, it’s totally reasonable to use the number 1776 to generally represent the Revolution.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    Did you not see the smiley face?
  86. That was a good one Steve. It ties quite a few different but related issues together nicely.

  87. @Chaotic Neutral
    I thought this entire affair was so stupid and obviously a manufactured controversy that I was going to ignore it, but now that the details are out, I think it has a more sinister connotation. What the media and leftists are attempting to do is bully any organized right wing or republican political activism. By showcasing these students on national media and demonizing them, the establishment is exposing them to future leftist harassment and even attack. I’m sure that smirking boy will have less success than comparable students in the college application process now. Perhaps all Covington students will now! There are probably loony leftists apparatchiks at every school just licking their lips with eagerness for their applications to arrive!

    When parents and administrators realize this, they will in the future be reluctant to bring students to rallies or political events realizing the prudence of laying low. It’s sort of like a small scale Charlottesville. Rightist will demur from public demonstration for fear of leftist bullying.

    I’m sure that smirking boy will have less success than comparable students in the college application process now. Perhaps all Covington students will now! There are probably loony leftists apparatchiks at every school just licking their lips with eagerness for their applications to arrive!

    See, now that’s the right’s problem as much as the left’s. If you’re still gonna play their game, sucking up to attend the fancy expensive Ivy League schools, dealing with the ctrl-left (most of them) HR ladies, worrying about what the other parents in the PTO (public schools) will think, etc., yeah, you will lose that way. Don’t play their games. They OWN the institutions: lower-ed, higher-ed, media, Big-Biz, and governments, all of it. If you revere all of that, then you are playing their game. Stick together!

    I hate to say we use another slogan from the 1960’s, but, hell, tune out and drop out, and what the hell was the other thing?

  88. I have a lot of experience in setting up events. So, the DNC has approached me to set up the stage for their Convention. See if you can help me. On opening night I have the separated migrant caravan children to stage left in cages, their incarcerated parents are depicted by cardboard cutouts at stage right. Mothers of black “boys” killed by police along the rainbow hued back curtain wall, and the anthem chanted by drumming Nathan Philips center stage. Sound good?

    • LOL: Dan Hayes
    • Replies: @Jack D
    You forgot Stormy Daniels and her stripper pole. Where will that be?

    Also Dr. Professor Christine Blasey Ford, Esq. and her seared Hippo Campus - gotta leave room for that.

    Also some Muslim Gold Star parents - the Khan family has already appeared and I'm not sure if there are any others, but please work on finding some. Or some other "we love Muslims" angle. Maybe Rashida Tlaib could appear and lead the crowd in a "Impeach the Motherf*cker" chant?
  89. “Actually … it’s really about race.”

    Precisely. I like Tucker, but he would jeopardize his position even further if he stated this fact.

    “The GOP appeals to Core Americans, the Democrats to Fringe Americans.”

    I’m a Core American at the fringe of the Democratic Party. I live in a state of confused frustration. There’s a few of us.

    ” … today’s rules of Identity Stalinism.”

    Steve Sailer nails it with this term. Too many Twitter, internet, and Fox News conservatives commit a serious rhetorical error when they refer to this new American left (the grandbabies of the old New Left, who must be so proud) as “fascists”. They are authoritarian, but these new leftist jerkoffs are cousins to Stalinism. I prefer Maoist.

  90. The three most powerful caucuses in the Democratic Party are the Hispanic, Asian Pacific-Islander, and the Black. Nothing can now pass through committee on the left without all three of their approval so they are de facto, TPTB within their party. On top of that, 50-60% of their funds come from Jewish Americans which has its own filtering effect. They just keep old white goy feminists like Pelosi around to put a white face on the party to keep from scaring the other white people.

    IMHO, this is why you won’t see anything happen on immigration unless it is capitulation by one side or the other. The coalition that is the Democratic party is very rigid and cannot withstand even a small amount of infighting. A fence will block more Hispanics so that is a non-starter. Interior enforcement harms Asians more because they get sent a longer way back and it is much harder for them to get back in so that is out too. Secure bio-metric ID would help but if everybody had one blacks could not bitch about being denied the right to vote taking away their best red meat topic so that is out also. So all the tools Trump has as President, even though they are the least effective overall, are incredibly divisive for the left coalition which is why he needs to declare an emergency and just build it. Once it is up it will be all over except the crying.

  91. @istevefan
    South African whites are tremendously outnumbered. US Whites are not. There are close to 195 million of us. Even accounting for self-hating Whites, there are still well over 100 million.

    If a group that large gets run over by the coalition of the fringes, then it deserves it. For our opponents are not some cohesive, well-oiled machine like conquerors of the past. No, our foes are dregs and degenerates who have little to no martial skills at all.

    Check out the photos sometimes of those reporters and others who blabber about replacing us. Not exactly people to worry about. E.g. check out photos of that Alex chick in a prior post. After seeing her you sort of feel ashamed for having taken her seriously.

    We have the advantage of knowing what is in the hearts and minds of our foes. We have the advantage of facing such a sorry coalition. We have numbers too. If we end up like South African Whites, we will have deserved it.

    The original idea was that these groups could become like everybody else in the US _if they were given time and tolerance_. That’s what T. Roosevelt tried to prevent the US from descending into a “polyglot boarding house”, and it seemed (but only seemed) to work, back then c.a. AD 1900.

    This idea of tolerance to give time for adaptation became tolerance for no particular reason (“tolerance” was said by Dobson to be the “chief tolerance of the Christian man”, nor reason or function given, back when Focus on the Family was important).

    Then it was changed to “tolerance is oppression”, still a duty, but now an offense as well.

    So it wasn’t so much fear or even idiocy as it was faith in the government that had won WW II and made the US predominant in world affairs. Genocide, of course, is about the biggest breach possible in the understanding the US citizens had it their Federal Government, and it started early, during the demilitarization push after WW II. People in those years were called the “silent generation” for a reason — they were made silent. By the 1960s, the silent ones were impersonated by actors (I was there, NYC East Village, Summer of Love. It was crowds and a few actors playing revolutionary, no real revolutionaries at all. Now, the silent ones are replaced by actors, foreign nationals, and groups that can’t exist in industrial societies.

    But we’re at the end of that, now.

    The town whence came the Catholic kids now realizes that its kids are suddenly no warning, attacked and hurt while trying to conform to the Left’s current psychosis. As McDuff says after Maceth kills Macduff’s family:
    “He has no children. All my pretty ones?
    Did you say all? O hell-kite! All?
    What, all my pretty chickens and their dam
    At one fell swoop?”
    W. Shakespeare, _Macbeth_, Act 4 Scene 3

    As it was for _Macbeth_, this sort of thing makes opposition that its choices are limited to chaos and watching their children be badly hurt and sometimes killed. Chaos usually wins, no matter the cost.

    Here’s what comes next, in mythological terms. Set was, in Egyptian mythology, the spirit of chaos, which underlies everything. Set has been under the discipline of dead social order, has in fact been the chief servant in the House of the Dead, by Anubis, Lord of the Dead, for a millennium. The “father and son” can be taken as “past and future”. With those interpretation, it fits our circumstances perfectly.

    Eventually Set (Chaos) realizes that he’s been a slave to an order that hates him, and says the following, which Chaos always end up saying to Order, as the silenced generations will say to their silencers:

    You have trained me for a thousand years in the House of the Dead
    that I might kill my son and my father.
    But now you face Set the Destroyer
    and your days are numbered.
    _Creatures of Light and Darkness_, R. Zelzny, 1969.

    And that’s what will be said in the USA (slightly edited) at some point in the future, exact time depending on chaotically sourced events.

    Counterinsurgency

    Note: the above is influenced by J. Peterson’s interpretation of Egyptian myth. Peterson isn’t all impractical fun and games.

  92. @An Immigrant
    All I can say is that
    "It is just the beginning".
    America's future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    "White man White woman couples" are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    “Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen.”

    What is this sorcery you speak of and how can I obtain it?

  93. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That’s why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.
     
    LOL. Hillary won the popular vote. The Electoral College is why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    Then thank Allah for the Electoral College, because Hillary was Baal’s choice.

  94. Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    Irrelevant. The impressive roster of media figures who went all in on reviling the Covington boys were not from South America.
    , @Jack D
    I've never been to a pow wow but I did once witness a dance ceremony at a New Mexico Pueblo. This was something that the Indians were doing for themselves and not as a tourist attraction - aside from my family and the residents of the pueblo there was hardly anyone else there. The dance mixed elements of Catholicism with Indian religion. The Spanish priests told them that they could keep worshipping the Corn Goddess but from now on they would have to call her the Virgin Mary and they were OK with that. Certain parts of the ceremony were conducted by the men in their kiva (lodge) and were off limits to everyone.

    Then one of the local families invited us to her house for lunch - it was apparently the saints day of someone in the household so it was a day of celebration and the custom was to invite guests for a meal. The food was Southwestern/American but someone in the household worked in a Chinese-American restaurant so they had all kinds of tacky knick knacks that you would see in such a place - Chinese restaurant placemats with the Chinese Zodiac on them, little umbrellas for the drinks, etc. , which I assume they had liberated from their employer (nothing of great value). It was all quite mind boggling but everyone was very nice and welcoming. I really didn't (and still don't) know what to make of it but it was certainly different.

    , @Anonymous
    Occam's Butterknife in action, folks.
    , @Jake
    Yours is a perfect post to come from one of our many Leftist organizations. You play the role of 'reasonable' Liberal well, which might lead to people putting their guards down, and then you drop this insanity that could come from any Neocon or any Leftist Jewish organization: "The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters."

    The most vocal and prolific BLM posters, in order: gay blacks, the black academic beneficiaries of affirmative action, Jews, Moslems, gay whites.
    , @J.Ross
    The only disharmony between white and red is what was ginned up by a proven liar who spreads disharmony for a living when he's not tactically operating operationally on refrigeration equipment.
    BLM (and other groups like By Any Means Necessary) are domestic terrorist groups that get a free pass from the law enforcement agencies of several cities and unlimited money from hostile foreigners -- such groups will always be far more important than a twitter account which has no power if you ignore it and which only showed up where things were already popping off. Anyone who talks about some harmless free speech "fanning the flames," but has no interest in the arsonist with the armload of Molotovs directly causing the literal flames, is suspiciously myopic.
    , @Lot
    Agree, except there is no connection to South America other than that is where the woman whose profile pic the suspended account used was from.

    Every indication is that it was a Russian agent fanning radical minority anger as they did in 2016.
    , @nebulafox
    >#4 includes a large group.

    True, but don't underestimate #3, either. I never fully appreciated until recently how many wackos the US has. Politics is the excuse to let go of their wackiness, not the other way around.

    And yes, I agree. I actually think the indigenous peoples of America send more people into the military per capita than any other ethnic group. Fits in well with the martial streak in their various cultures, and for young people unlucky enough to be on a reservation with some ambition, offers a ticket out.

    >The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    Putin is profoundly a-ideological when it comes to foreign support-as long as it benefits the Kremlin, he'll bankroll anybody, no matter how personally bizarre he and his cronies would probably privately find them. See the simultaneous support of SYRIZA along with the FN.

    , @AnotherDad

    Not many people mentioned:
    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.
    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.
     
    Who cares?

    These people are not the problem. The problem is that liberals crave this stuff, demand it and bathe in it.

    This wasn't some clever super-duper forgery. They just whacked off the leading context of the video and shipped it. There wasn't even anything objectionable in the viral video. Even if you believed the worse possible context--the kids "surrounded" the Indians--you'd think, "Ok teenagers. Their school and parents should have a talk with them about both polite behavior and the wisdom of steering clear of activist loons and potential confrontations." But that was not the reaction of liberals. It was mindless hysteria and hate.

    That's the problem. Not people "sowing division". Not "the Russians". Nope, the problem is the hatred of American elites for regular white Americans. They are the problem. No one else is to blame.
  95. @Hypnotoad666

    How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?
     
    The key to the whole thing is overturning the central (self-imposed) taboo in American culture and politics: i.e., that Whites shall not be allowed to form a group identity or advocate for their interests, as such.

    This will be very, very difficult due to the ingrained cuckery of most Whites in positions of power. But once a tipping point is reached where even the cowards and careerists are not frightened to treat Whites as just another ethnic group, the whole anti-White edifice will come tumbling down.

    To begin the process, Whites need to wrap their minds around the new paradigm that Legacy Americans are now an embattled minority. The anti-White left fully controls the Media, Hollywood, the Permanent Bureaucracy, Academia, and even the crony capitalist corporations.

    So reject all obsolete sentiments of collective guilt or noblesse oblige. Instead, simply develop a mental immunity to charges of "racism." No apologizing or virtue signalling that "I am one of the good ones," and "of course there is real discrimination against marginalized people but . . ."

    If wanting equal treatment is "racist," then color me "racist." (Maybe we should own the word like blacks call each other "my nigga.")

    In terms of forming tactics and strategy, I think a good guideline is to ask ourselves WWJD? -- By that, I mean "What Would Jews Do?"

    If someone tries to shame the Jews about their oppression of Palestinians do they cringe and grovel and apologize? Hell no. They go on the offensive and accuse their accuser of "Anti-Semitism." Legacy Americans likewise need to stay on the offensive against anti-White racism. In addition to being effective, this position has the added benefit of being morally correct.

    Agreed. But this means living in a constant state of racial conflict, which severely interferes with my mellow buzz. Where’s that time machine?

  96. @Buffalo Joe
    I have a lot of experience in setting up events. So, the DNC has approached me to set up the stage for their Convention. See if you can help me. On opening night I have the separated migrant caravan children to stage left in cages, their incarcerated parents are depicted by cardboard cutouts at stage right. Mothers of black "boys" killed by police along the rainbow hued back curtain wall, and the anthem chanted by drumming Nathan Philips center stage. Sound good?

    You forgot Stormy Daniels and her stripper pole. Where will that be?

    Also Dr. Professor Christine Blasey Ford, Esq. and her seared Hippo Campus – gotta leave room for that.

    Also some Muslim Gold Star parents – the Khan family has already appeared and I’m not sure if there are any others, but please work on finding some. Or some other “we love Muslims” angle. Maybe Rashida Tlaib could appear and lead the crowd in a “Impeach the Motherf*cker” chant?

    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    Jack, outstanding suggestions. Sorry I'm not hiring right now but you will get credit in the Event Program.
    , @El Dato
    While that uplifting e-Wokes fiesta is going on down on the Sanctuary Safespace Moon, the RNC is held in an orderly fashion just outside:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqZ0WRZmDfQ
  97. Check out this column about the Hebrew Israelites – https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/23/us/black-hebrew-israelites-covington-catholic.html

    Those guys are basically “Black Westboro Baptists” in terms of tactics and yet they get treated like a reasonable group with reasonable aims by the New York Times.

  98. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them?

    Do what the Yellow Vests do. First, get out of the Sailer’s ghetto. Broaden the narrative. Make it about the economy and the system. Fight the swamp not the tools and props that the swamp is using like the ridiculous Indian guy and his drum and the silly Black Hebrews.

  99. Anonymous[786] • Disclaimer says:

    Meanwhile, DC’s LEO delightfully practices Stallinism in all matters regarding to Orange Man Bad stunts.

    The Feebees would totally like to find the culprits of this latest disgusting act of games of trolling, but their code of dishonor prevents them from being involved in any affair that could lead to internal fraternicide :

    https://www.popville.com/2019/01/spotted-in-meridian-hill-park-over-the-weekend/

  100. @Jack D
    You forgot Stormy Daniels and her stripper pole. Where will that be?

    Also Dr. Professor Christine Blasey Ford, Esq. and her seared Hippo Campus - gotta leave room for that.

    Also some Muslim Gold Star parents - the Khan family has already appeared and I'm not sure if there are any others, but please work on finding some. Or some other "we love Muslims" angle. Maybe Rashida Tlaib could appear and lead the crowd in a "Impeach the Motherf*cker" chant?

    Jack, outstanding suggestions. Sorry I’m not hiring right now but you will get credit in the Event Program.

  101. Psst.

    Steve, its “Holodomor”, not “Holomodor”.

    Not too shabby, but it needs more fleshing out. The first half is good, but the second falls apart into a laundry list about how “this is like that”.

  102. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?
     
    Young Alyssa Milano? Maybe. Aging Alyssa? Hmmm.

    https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/08/AlyssaMilanorussia1.jpg

    There’s no maybe to it, she was hot. When a leftist harpy insipidly yammers about on twitter I increase the toxicity of my masculinity by doing a google image search and including “topless” in the search. She was smoking.

  103. @Jack D
    You forgot Stormy Daniels and her stripper pole. Where will that be?

    Also Dr. Professor Christine Blasey Ford, Esq. and her seared Hippo Campus - gotta leave room for that.

    Also some Muslim Gold Star parents - the Khan family has already appeared and I'm not sure if there are any others, but please work on finding some. Or some other "we love Muslims" angle. Maybe Rashida Tlaib could appear and lead the crowd in a "Impeach the Motherf*cker" chant?

    While that uplifting e-Wokes fiesta is going on down on the Sanctuary Safespace Moon, the RNC is held in an orderly fashion just outside:

  104. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That’s why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.
     
    LOL. Hillary won the popular vote. The Electoral College is why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    Hillary won the popular vote

    Right. So why didn’t that translate to the Supreme Executive Power that HC wanted?

    Well, because the Electoral College is the way it is for a reason. People who occupy territory have more on the ground power than do people who don’t. The majority vote that Hillary got was from foreign nationals and, to be blunt, vote theft. See what that buys you in a non-electoral process.

    What it comes to is that cities are now islands in a countryside that has rejected them. The cities have no economic importance other than finance, and are in fact unable to so much as maintain their capital plant. They are, moreover, about the only concentrated targets for foreign enemy the US has [1].

    If things come to a serious contest, your side is toast. The Left are fools to rely on violence; it’s the one area where they can’t compete. This Catholic school business — the Left has graduated from political violence to terrorism, targeting children _who were playing stupid games assigned them by a Left teacher_. Terrorism unleashes chaos, and you now are the establishment: chaos isn’t your friend.

    Counterinsurgency
    1] Copley.
    _Uncivilization_.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    If things come to a serious contest, your side is toast. The Left are fools to rely on violence; it’s the one area where they can’t compete.
     
    COIN, you may be making incorrect assumptions about what side I’m on.
  105. Sung to the tune of “Pretty Fly (For a White Guy)”

    Gunter, glieben, glauten, globen

    [Chorus]
    Give it to me baby
    Uh huh, uh huh
    Give it to me baby
    Uh huh, uh huh
    Give it to me baby
    Uh huh, uh huh
    And all the girlies say
    He’s got spunk, for a white punk.

    Uno dos tres, cuatro cinco cinco seis.

    His name is Nick Sandmann and he’s a devout Catholic,
    And all the girlies say he’s pretty fly for a spastic.
    He’s anti-homosex and he’s anti-abortion;
    He no longer gives a f–k, to the wind he throws caution.
    He don’t pack a gat,
    Just wears a MAGA hat.
    You know it takes a lotta guts to do that.
    He’s overcompensative,
    But stared down a native.
    Would you? No way!
    Would you? No way!
    With his famous smirk
    People think he’s a jerk,
    But his duty is a precious thing he’ll never shirk.
    The world needs kids with guts.
    Let’s get some more kids with nuts.
    So, hey hey, do that brand-new thing.

    [Chorus]
    Give it to me baby, etc.

  106. In my mind I love replaying the whole scenario with the shoe on the other foot:

    1. A group of Black teens waits for a charter bus in DC. They are wearing “I’m with her” Hillary hats.

    2. A group of Neo-Nazis, all White adult males, begins to taunt the group, calling them “Negroes” and someone yells “Go back to Africa.”

    3. An individual from a group sacred to the right – let’s say a White, male decorated Marine combat vet – sees what’s going on. He marches in front of the Black teens and starts banging on a military drum while singing the Marines’ Hymn in their face. The Black teens respond by smirking at him (because there wouldn’t be a full-on fist fight by now if it were Black teens…)

    Has the left really gone this insane? I went on the NYTimes comments section of David Brook’s tepid mea culpa and was shocked (but should I be anymore) to find the lefty Times readers still defending the Indian and attacking the White teens. Again, keep in mind these were teens and the other all adults.

    The left keeps on topping itself. When the London Underground stopped using “ladies and gentleman” to not offend trans people I thought, surely, this must be the bottom. Apparently not.

    This is mad. There’s simply no arguing with these people.

    • Replies: @David

    I thought, surely, this must be the bottom. Apparently not.
     
    A line from Dylan that frequently informs my thoughts is, "When you think you've lost everything, you find out you can always lose a little more."
  107. “the white boy’s manly impassivity under assault just proved he was the bad guy.” Get a dictionary Sailer , the phrase “manly impassivity under assault” is contradictory nonsense . The child’s rictus of confusion under assault was a perfect illustration of how bleak the White man’s future in his own homelands appears to be .
    Shit you can’t even write a good polemic . “May you live in interesting times” . I was looking for a different clip but this one is amusing as well :

    BTW that was not an example of “manliness” or “impassivity” on Michael Douglas’ part .

    • Replies: @Prof. Woland
    I cannot help but believe that part of what troubles liberals is that what will happen when conservatives stop being physically passive. Had this Indian or the Black Hebrews thrown the first punch, the whole Covington School would have been justified swarming their attackers and laying them out. This kid did not look particularly tough but imagine the senior football team taking on 6 fat adults and an almost senior citizen. I think of how the Chinese high school basketball players and audience rushed the visiting American (black) team
    https://youtu.be/jmG9G-ZwDDc
    Turning the other cheek with these guys and liberals in general does not work and they will just comeback for more.
  108. @Jack D
    You play it just like those white boys did - you don't take the bait, you don't fall for the provocation. Yes, they were condemned anyway in the short run but (and this is driving the Left even more wild) in the longer cycle they won the confrontation. Nothing will change the mind of the most extreme, out of touch with reality Leftists but most reasonable people now understand that the initial picture presented of evil whites who might as well have been wearing KKK hoods and robes was not truthful - at a minimum the situation was "more complicated". Each time one of these hate hoaxes is perpetrated and then turns out to be a dud, it diminishes the impact of the tactic. Yes, the media keeps trying to memory hole them, but ordinary people are not idiots and remember and take media accounts nowadays with a grain of salt.

    Now the media keeps trying to flip the script and tell us that white teenagers from the sticks are really the "privileged" so that it is ok to punch "up" at them (while billionaires are the "oppressed") but people are not going to accept such topsy-turvy thinking in the long run. And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked - the way to gain sympathy is to maintain the high ground and make the bully look bad.

    ordinary people are not idiots

    Citation needed.

    • LOL: Achmed E. Newman
  109. Anonymous[200] • Disclaimer says:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    "If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say “enough is enough!” what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time the media uses normal reactions by whites as evidence against us."
     

    Welcome to the dilemma faced by patriotic parties/movements in the UK like the BNP or EDL (or even UKIP). Attacks on you will be ignored by the media if serious injury is caused, if you're chased down the street with things being thrown it'll be used as proof of your unpopularity.

    If you stand your ground and fight (as EDL often do when attacked), or even if you don't, the headlines will read "35 arrested as trouble flares at EDL march" - even if every one of those 35 people is a left winger, and the local press will say "their hate-filled marches bring trouble to our streets" - half-true, but highly misleading because all the trouble comes from the other side.

    If someone finally has enough and goes postal like Thomas Mair - who killed his local Labour MP in the UK - stand by for the canonisation of the victim and 24/7 coverage. If someone like Theo Van Gogh is killed - well, he was asking for it, wasn't he?

    PS - OT, but this is very iSteve

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/oracle-owes-400m-to-women-black-asian-workers-dol-says

    "Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing."

    Oracle robbed just about anyone who wasn’t a pasty white male of $400m, says Uncle Sam: Lucrative govt IT contracts at risk in discrim row

    The bizarre clickbait headline is followed by:

    Amid the Dept of Labor’s allegations is the claim that Big Red prefers to scoop up foreign Asian graduates on the cheap, sponsor their US immigration visas, and then keep a relatively low ceiling their wages. We’re told that if you happen to be Asian and a recent college graduate – particularly an Indian grad – Big Red will favor you over other university-age candidates, and offer you a job in America as a level-one professional techie.

    Whites, Hispanics, and African Americans were all unfairly snubbed during the recruitment process of college-age kids, according to the department’s complaint.

    Well, databases ARE boring….

    While the color of your skin may help you get aboard, it won’t help you embiggen your wage packet, it is claimed. Raises are seemingly reserved for White blokes. … Dept of Labor said Asians and African Americans had lower than expected pay compared to their White colleagues, and women lower than men, even when factors from full-time status and global career level, to job specialty, estimated prior work experience, and company tenure were taken into account.

    Lousy employer, apparently.

    And there is a take on everything.

    In a statement, Oracle’s top brass said: “This meritless lawsuit is based on false allegations and a seriously flawed process within the OFCCP that relies on cherry-picked statistics rather than reality. We fiercely disagree with the spurious claims and will continue in the process to prove them false. We are in compliance with our regulatory obligations, committed to equality, and proud of our employees.”

  110. @Jack D

    For example, Dover (MA’s wealthiest town and 56-43 Romney in 2013), which had NEVER voted for a Democrat at the presidential level (it even voted for Goldwater!), went 57-32 Clinton.
     
    Trump is somewhat unique in that he is a populist rather than a mainstream GOPe figure. As such, his big appeal is with non-college whites and not with the rich educated whites in a place like Dover. Mass last went Republican in 1984 so it really doesn't make a damn bit of difference how the rich whites of Dover (and by definition there aren't that many rich people to begin with) vote.

    As we saw in the differing Senate vs House results in the recent election, Democrats can flip certain upscale suburban districts by appealing to nice white college educated ladies but this is not enough to flip entire states or the Electoral College. Or at least Trump hopes so.

    Trump is somewhat unique in that he is a populist rather than a mainstream GOPe figure. As such, his big appeal is with non-college whites and not with the rich educated whites in a place like Dover.

    Trump won among college-educated Whites.

  111. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    Her “activism” knows no boundaries. I surmise that it’s out of latent guilt from having serviced directors to gain roles. Now that fornication is the new rape, she plays the victim role … which of course spawns the activist role … which is now activism in everything from abused animals to “abused” women. Little surprise that she saw oppression at first glance in the direction of the Covington youth. It’s her nature.

  112. @Paleo Liberal
    Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    Irrelevant. The impressive roster of media figures who went all in on reviling the Covington boys were not from South America.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Irrelevant. The impressive roster of media figures who went all in on reviling the Covington boys were not from South America.
     
    This. Who is the Paleo Liberal person squirting squid ink for?
  113. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That’s why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.
     
    LOL. Hillary won the popular vote. The Electoral College is why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    Your point? That has always been the rule. Trump won over the right Americans in the right places, not vast numbers of redundant votes in CA. That’s how we do it in the USA.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    My point was to factually correct Jack’s Pollyannaish statement. Assuming Jack meant the entire voting population, Trump did not “win over the American people”— but he thankfully did win enough Deplorables to take the Electoral College.
  114. @Paleo Liberal
    Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    I’ve never been to a pow wow but I did once witness a dance ceremony at a New Mexico Pueblo. This was something that the Indians were doing for themselves and not as a tourist attraction – aside from my family and the residents of the pueblo there was hardly anyone else there. The dance mixed elements of Catholicism with Indian religion. The Spanish priests told them that they could keep worshipping the Corn Goddess but from now on they would have to call her the Virgin Mary and they were OK with that. Certain parts of the ceremony were conducted by the men in their kiva (lodge) and were off limits to everyone.

    Then one of the local families invited us to her house for lunch – it was apparently the saints day of someone in the household so it was a day of celebration and the custom was to invite guests for a meal. The food was Southwestern/American but someone in the household worked in a Chinese-American restaurant so they had all kinds of tacky knick knacks that you would see in such a place – Chinese restaurant placemats with the Chinese Zodiac on them, little umbrellas for the drinks, etc. , which I assume they had liberated from their employer (nothing of great value). It was all quite mind boggling but everyone was very nice and welcoming. I really didn’t (and still don’t) know what to make of it but it was certainly different.

  115. @Dieter Kief
    "(...) which now uses the human race to make up stories for their own amusement."

    Which means what: That poor me, being undoubtedly not one person glued together from the better halfes of a genius (Wolfe) and an at times impressive writer (the other one, you mention above) - as I say: Being only me, I have a good excuse to be not that amused about what's going on here. I find it quite troubling, I have to admit. And Jonathan Haidt's Heterodox Academy one of the good answers (Steve Sailer's on the spot dissections of these modern times conundrums working as an immediate pain killer - the victory lap is well deserved).

    (In small letters - very small ones: What about the new book, Mr. Sailer? Does it grow? It needn't become that big. Even 200+ p. would do nicely! title: Identity Stalinism)

    My point is that real life is turning into one big postmodern novel filled with characters like Rev. Reggie Bacon, Charlotte Simmons, Officer Nestor Camacho, Professor Coleman Silk, and Swede Levov.

    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
    I see. And I agree - with one little caveat: You're right Bacon, Simmons, Officer Camacho, Silk etc. are prototypes of our societies.
    My caveat: That's what novels are about - since ages: To create characters, which allow the reader to understand and feel even - better what's going on.
    My caveat: That is what modern literature is all about - and there is basically no difference between - Thomas Manns Felix Krull and Balzac's Lucien Chardon in Lost IllusionsThe Human Comedy.
    Tom Wolfe was right: The Postmodern novel is the modern novel - is the novel...

    The career of the expression postmodernity is in itself - in its inner unnecessity and intellectual superficiality and hollowness and pompousness - just one more example for the human comedy.

    (If one thinks of Sterne (or Jean Paul as the most advanced German writer of the 18th/19th century) there is not a single aspect of the supposedly postmodern novel, that - Jean Paul especially - would not have shown already (not to mention the Fatrasien of the French middle ages - - - ).
  116. Anon[315] • Disclaimer says:

    Identity Stalinism or Identity Hitlerism?

    Stalinism was about class war. Who/Whom was determined mainly by class(though ‘class’ could be defined rather flexibly). After all, peoples of all ethnic backgrounds participated in the Soviet project. Josef Stalin himself was a Georgian working with many non-Russians to rule over the Russian Empire.

    On the other hand, I suppose the current PC is Stalinist in the Orwellian sense because of political fluidity amidst ideological rigidity. In some ways, Stalinism was hard-leftist and Marxist-Leninist, but in the end, whatever Stalin said was the ultimate truth(until Stalin said something else). So, Nazi Germany was enemy forever prior to 1939, friend from 30 to 41, and enemy again from 41 to 45. Such discrepancy was less problematic with fascism that favored ideological ‘creativity’ and pluralism, aka the Third Position. In contrast, Stalinism claimed to be the highest achievement of Marxist-Leninist ideology but so often deviated from its ideals according to Stalin’s whims. And, there is something similar in the politics of the current West. For one thing, the Truth is less about a set of values or principles that the whims of Jewish Personality. So, ‘Nationalism good for Israel, bad for Hungary. Nukes good for Israel, bad for Iran. Cheney bad for failed war in Iraq, but Trump also bad for wanting to pull out from Middle East.’
    In some ways, PC is about rigidity of passion. PC folks easily get triggered by the slightest deviance, and yet, rules change so fast that even many PC folks aren’t sure of the latest trends and what they’re supposed to bark at and when. One difference between Stalinism and Globo-Homo is there was genuine ideological underpinning to communism whereas Globo-Homo is less about ideology than iconography. A kind of ICON Curtain has descended on the West, and that is why the image of the white kid with ‘smirk'(looked more like a bemused smile to me) was so triggering. According to PC, white male, esp with MAGA hat, is the Iconic Image of Evil. And that was enough for the Iconoclasmic rage. Iconoclasm is the Rage-Orgasm of the globo-homo progs. Iconography for the good, iconoclasm for the bad. Even the use of terminology is iconocentric in current PC. Marxists spoke of the proletariat and bourgeoisie, terms emphasizing economic stations of peoples. But a term like ‘white privilege’ conjures White Face as evil. And a term like ‘people of color’ creates a mental image of people of various races and colors. And it’s telling that women are now so much into vagina and even wear ‘pussy hats’ or clothing shaped like actual poons. Icunts. And when we think of homos, we don’t really think of ideas or values. We just think of homo-as-saint characters on TV shows, ‘rainbow’ flags, and ‘gay pride’ parades. And homoshering of food is more fun than koshering. We aren’t sure which foods are ‘kosher’ or why, but look at those ‘rainbow’ pack of Oreo cookies. Right, I just love to bite into food thinking of homos buggering each other or a guy having his penis cut by Frankenstein Medicine.

    The problem for Jews is they don’t have much iconic status. They once did as comedians in a more inhibited and cerebral age. Back then, Jews as subversive agents had lots of iconic value as agents for greater liberty. Lenny Bruce wasn’t a looker but his foul talk seemed daring. But we now live in a shameless age of cultural filth, and so, no Jewish guy can score points just by being subversive or going on and on about his pud like Philip Roth or Ron Jeremy. And as our culture is anti-intellectual, Jews won’t gain much ground by being like Norman Mailer — novelist and public intellectual — and Susan Sontag, an essayist who wrote on difficult matters, the Jewish Mind gets less respect. There was a time when the culture made a big deal of Woody Allen trying to make serious movies, the American Bergman. While the culture has grown more uninhibited in terms of sex and violence, it has grown more stunted intellectually due to power of PC and idolatry(over ideology or as the new ideology). Things got so crazy that it takes real courage for someone like Jordan Peterson to say, “Wait a minute.. that man is a man, not a woman.” The culture is retarded and anti-intellectual… or it is pseudo-intellectual or schizo-intellectual. It’s not sane about anything. Jewish comedians used to score points by using wit to subvert sacred cows. It was easier to do in the past when Sacred Cows were associated with Power, thus ‘punching up’ to Wasps and White Christians. But now, the Sacred Cows are associated with Powerlessness even though Jews, homos, and blacks have lots of power. Comedians can still beat up on whites, but at this point, it’s like beating a dead horse or feeding a fed horse. Norman Mailer warned of the ‘fascism of the left’ as more dangerous because, traditionally, the left defined itself as the power of freedom against tyranny and repression. But when the struggle itself turns dogmatic and hardline, there is no place to go for freedom. People went to the left for freedom it couldn’t find on the right, but if the left is for dogma, then freedom is dead all around. Granted, the dangers of the Left were evident from the beginning with the French Revolution. And Orwell wrote the perfect book on Stalinism or radical leftism as tyranny beyond tyranny. Still, many people in the West chose to believe the failure of Eastern Communism had less to do with ideology than Oriental Despotism of Slavicism.

    Because Jews have less iconic power now, they must maintain grip-and-whip on their proxies with the more iconic or ‘idolic’ power. They are blacks due to sports and music. And homos for their flaming narcissism. Most POC groups have no iconic power but, as the saying goes, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Diversity has been promoted as an iconic image of New America where All the World is drinking coke and singing(or maybe ‘twerking’) in perfect harmony. Because Jews control finance, academia, media, deep state, courts, law firms, and most whore politicians, they have lots of tricks to control the dogs. Jews are masters, and their proxies are like dogs. But, dogs are not always easy to train. Sure, you can make them track a scent, but dogs sometimes have a mind of their own.. or they might become distracted by something other than the scent. Or, what if the dogs mistake YOU for the scent. This is problematic for Jews because the ‘scent’ of whiteness is sometimes detected on Jews by non-whites. “No, bad doggy, my smell is holocausty-whitey, good. Go after nazi-whitey, bad.” Also, it takes some time and effort to train dogs. Some of these immigrant groups come from nations where people have been trained to dislike Jews. Now, it’s a tall order for Jews to re-train Muslims and such folks to love Jews. But maybe they can be trained to bark and bite so furiously at Bad-whitey that they won’t bother with Jewish-whitey. This is why yellow dogs are especially useful. Yellows come with either neutral or pro-Jewish attitudes(because they love to suck up to power), and so, Jews can train them to be like Sarah Jeong. As for folks from Latin America, Jews know they can easily make them bark at Gringo. White Latinos have this envy for Anglo-Americans, and so, Latin whites and Jewish whites make common cause to take more from northern whites. As for the browns, they feel resentment against blanco. It doesn’t matter whether it’s Latin whites or gringo whites. Even as they want to live under richer gringos, they are filled with inferiority complex, and Jews play on that. But Muslims and blacks are problematic dogs to train. Muslims have a very proud religion that isn’t about turn-the-other-cheek. Also, POC ideology actually favors them against Jews in a way. Many folks around the world see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as WHITE Jewish colonialists vs brown oppressed. As for blacks, they are dawgs than dogs, or dogs-with-attitude. Unlike yellow dogs and brown dogs, blacks are not easy to train. They like to let the good rabbits run and chase after them. Also, as dawgs are semi-wolf-like in aggression, they get pissed if the master demands too much. Or black dawgs go too far with the aggression. When the Jewish master tells black dawgs to bark at whitey, he doesn’t necessarily mean that they should run wild and burn down entire cities, messing things up for gentrification as well. But black dawgs often get out of control, as with BLM fiasco. (So, Jews have been trying to spin it as controlled by Russia.)

    Jewish Power is crucial in the equation because the elites get to call the shots through control of the Megaphone and Methadone. Jews can rouse people to hatred or soothe them with happy feely stuff. Take the Women’s March. Why was it shut down for being ‘antisemitic’ but not ‘anti-Palestinian’? After all, many Jewish women in feminism support Zionism that crushes Palestinians in West Bank. Also, lots of Jewish women in media, academia, and Deep State have pushed policies that spread Wars for Israel all over Middle East and North Africa. Why didn’t anyone sound the alarm about how feminism and the Women’s March movement have too many Zionist and Lesbian women who’s been supporting neo-imperialism, Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, and globalist wars? It’s because Jews control the means of discourse, the platforms, and the money. To put on massive events, you need money and good media coverage. Jewish Power is okay with Women’s March being full of Zionist women and lesbians who support the Deep State and Neo-Imperialism, BUT my oh my, something must be done about all those ‘anti-Semites’.
    Consider the anti-BDS laws. It is the Jews who invaded Palestine, drove out native folks and who continue to occupy West Bank. Jews also violate international norms and have 300 nukes made from stolen uranium from the US. But the US sends billions in aid to Israel, and both Political Parties suck up to Jewish Power while Palestinian-Americans and their supporters are fired and blacklisted for standing up for justice for Palestinians. Now, it’d be one thing if one could choose to support or condemn Israel OR support or condemn Palestinians. A matter of personal conscience and liberty. But in the US, one has no choice but to favor Israel over Palestinians in all the institutions and industries that count. If you’re homeless, you can use free speech. But if you’re a person of any consequence, you will be utterly destroyed if you support BDS.

    Jewish anti-whiteness has several facets to it.

    1. There is fear based on actual history. There have been times when White Christians and Neo-Pagans did hurt Jews real bad. Jews have deep historical memory and know well that history can change fast. So, there is genuine Jewish fear of White Power.

    2. There is whiteness as convenient scapegoat. This is especially useful for Jews because they are the new ruling class. Generally, those on top get the most criticism and abuse from below. Jews don’t mind criticism of the elites in Israel because both elites and people are Jewish. So, the criticism of elite power in Israel isn’t about ‘antisemitism’ but abuse and corruption. But in the US, Jews fear that criticism of Jewish elites can turn into anti-Jewish animus or call out on what is essentially Jewish supremacism. Then, it’s convenient for Jews to have so many people blame ‘white privilege’ for all the problems. Even as or especially because Jews constantly vilify Wasps, Jews need them to stick around if only as Evil Icons or Straw Men for bashing. Wasps are the useful decoy or degoy. So, in Hollywood movies, the Face of Evil is usually some Waspy type who heads a corporation or department. Or some Russian-type.

    3. Another reason why Jews are so anti-white is because they are so dependent on white. Even if whites don’t become anti-Jewish, Jews hate the notion of white autonomy, or whites feeling pretty good to be white. “It’s Okay to be White” pissed off so many Jews. If whites feel that way, they will gain pride and confidence. They would no longer need to atone by obeying a morally superior holy group for redemption. But the fact is Jewish Power is all head and no body. For example, how could the US military serve as the arm of Zionists IF white generals and soldiers feel that the US military exists mainly to serve and defend the US, not to serve in Middle East wars for Israel? So, Jews have to inject continuous doses of ‘white guilt’ to make whites lose pride and confidence. A guilty people feel they must serve others for atonement, and Jewish Power naturally says ‘you must serve us’.
    The Diversity Stuff is really just a ruse. If most Jews are really into Equal Justice for All Peoples, why do they insist the US support Israel against Palestinians, Syria, and Iran? The problem for Jews is that they are essentially pushing a tribal agenda spun as universal agenda. To fool us, Jews use terminology like ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’ AND iconography of People of Color, but when we look at the nitty-gritty details of globalism, it’s always JEWS FIRST and ISRAEL FIRST. Look at US vs Russia, US vs Iran, US vs Palestinians, US vs Syria, US vs Libya, and etc, and the Surest Common Denominator is they are all designed to serve Jewish interests. I mean, what do Mexican-Americans care about Syria? What do black-Americans care about Iran? What do hillbillies in W. Virginia care about expanding NATO to Ukraine? What do Filipino-Americans care about Libya? What do Italian-Americans care about BDS? It’s all about Jews, but Jews know they can’t sell it as such… so we are told that a nuclear-armed Iran is going to blow up the US, Russia is out to grab the world, China is planning to take over everything, and other such nonsense. Now, I’m thinking that many POC at elite levels know that Jews are full of it, but they go along with the charade because it’s their only ticket into the corridors of power and privilege. And this is why Jews love to parade around Obama. He’s been a good boy who did the bidding of Jews and their homo allies. He was made president and was showered with millions and millions of money and glorious media coverage. Uncle Charm.
    That said, there is something to admire about Jews. Just consider. Look at all those Muslims in the US military who take orders from the Zionist-controlled government to go destroy Muslim nations. If Muslim-Americans are ordered to drop bombs to kill Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East, they will do so. But imagine if Muslim-Americans have an average IQ of 130, take over much of media and elite institutions. Suppose they use their media and money power to vilify Israel as the greatest abuser of human rights, a ‘New Nazi Nation’. Suppose the Muslim-American elites steer the US to use sanctions to kill 100,000s of Jewish kids and to employ shock-and-awe tactics to blow Israel to smithereens. How many Jewish-Americans would join in this massacre? Probably none. On that score, Jews are better than white cucks and Muslim morons.

    4. Another reason why Jews and POC are so anti-white is they are addicted to whiteness. Despite all the anti-white iconoclasm, the fact is whiteness still has tremendous iconic value. Black athletes want blonde white women. Look at Tiger Woods. He was celebrated for his mixed-race-ness but he never went for mixed-race women but for Aryan-looking women. Look at silly Asians with their hair-dyeing and plastic surgery, or their videogames with white-looking characters. Hayao Miyazaki’s movies were all set in some white fantasy lands before TORORO, and even there, Asian characters are drawn with features that look more Caucasian. And in Latin America, brown folks are addicted to Soap Opera with mostly white characters. And men in Turkey and Middle East got the Natasha Syndrome.

    https://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/17/world/istanbul-journal-natasha-syndrome-brings-on-a-fever-in-turkey.html

    https://www.forbes.com/2008/11/24/russia-bond-girls-oped-cx_mk_1125kaylan.html#2515ef1b61aa

    Because all the world wants whiteness — good governance, personable-ness, ability & competence, sexual attraction, balance of reason and emotion, etc — , they hate the idea of whites owning whiteness. If whites own whiteness, then whites would get to decide what to do with their lands, passion, abilities, sex appeal, legacy, and etc. What’s the difference between a woman of dignity and a whore? Woman of dignity has control over her body and decides who can be with her. In contrast, a whore is open to anyone with a few bucks. (Odd thing about Abortion Rights is it’s sold as women’s control over her own body but actually promotes behavior where she has less self-control because she can always negate the unwanted pregnancy with sucking out the fetus. She can act like a whore without suffering the consequence.) A woman of dignity owns herself and her own body. She gets to determine who can be with her. A whore, on the other hand, has to do what the pimp tells her to. Her body must put out to all comers willing to pay.
    Similarly, white dignity and autonomy would mean that whiteness has value in and of itself. It has meaning as heredity, legacy, heritage, and history. If whites are unique and have dignity, they can decide their own destiny and say NO to non-whites who want to partake of whiteness.
    Then, the ONLY way to make whiteness accessible to all the world is to commoditize it into a product, and the end-logic of this is the pornification of whiteness as meat. And it won’t be long before globo-homo forces will call for legalization of prostitution.
    In a way, what was done to Slavic women in Israeli and Arab brothels was hardly different from what is being done to whiteness as a whole all around the world. Whites are being told that they don’t own their whiteness. White lands are not white. White history is not white. Ancient Greece was not white. Medieval Europe was not white. White heroes are not white. (Let’s cast blacks as Achilles, Julius Caesar, Lancelot, and Hamilton.) White bodies are not white and put out to other races as servings and offerings. So, if 100 million black African men move to Europe, each is deserving of a white womb to produce black babies. And the US as white-envisioned and white-made nation? No way, that’s ‘racist’. Just let tons of browns from south of the border barge in and grab SWPM or Stuff White People Made. Even though the psycho who killed the plastic surgeon for passing ‘white features’ to Asians was a nutter, he had a point. Another race was appropriating specific features of whiteness for itself. He was accused of ‘white supremacism’, but aren’t Asians the Real White Supremacists by undergoing surgery to replace ‘ugly’ Asian features with ‘beautiful’ white ones? And all these immigration patterns have one thing in common: We want to be with white than with our own kind. Jewish immigration always preferred whiteness.

    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-11/news/mn-22701_1_white-supremacist

    So, this aspect of anti-whiteness is really a paradox. Jews and non-whites beat up on whitey to destroy the notion that proud whites own whiteness. That way, ashamed whites will market whiteness as just a commodity for all of humanity to buy or partake of.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Josef Stalin himself was a Georgian working with many non-Russians to rule over the Russian Empire.
     
    It was an ethnic war against ethnic Russians.
    , @The preferred nomenclature is...
    Hire an editor.
    , @J.Ross
    After all, peoples of all ethnic backgrounds participated in the Soviet project.

    This is "true" in the same way that this statement applies to the Third Reich: millions of people represented very imperfectly by celebrities or tokens, time determining place, and so on.
    , @Jack D
    TL;DR. Whites good, Jews bad.
    , @Anonymous
    Your list of the motivations behind Jewish hostility toward White Christians left out the most important one: sexual insecurity, sexual envy, opposition to intermarriage.
  117. @istevefan
    South African whites are tremendously outnumbered. US Whites are not. There are close to 195 million of us. Even accounting for self-hating Whites, there are still well over 100 million.

    If a group that large gets run over by the coalition of the fringes, then it deserves it. For our opponents are not some cohesive, well-oiled machine like conquerors of the past. No, our foes are dregs and degenerates who have little to no martial skills at all.

    Check out the photos sometimes of those reporters and others who blabber about replacing us. Not exactly people to worry about. E.g. check out photos of that Alex chick in a prior post. After seeing her you sort of feel ashamed for having taken her seriously.

    We have the advantage of knowing what is in the hearts and minds of our foes. We have the advantage of facing such a sorry coalition. We have numbers too. If we end up like South African Whites, we will have deserved it.

    Absolutely spot on!

  118. @anon
    Good article, but one correction: It's HoloDoMor, not HoloMoDor.
    From Russian/Ukrainian "golod" (pronounced "holod" in the Ukrainian dialect): hunger + "moritj": kill slowly, by deprivation.

    West is now about Homo-Do-More

  119. Tucker Carlson is correct: It is NOT really about race. The Left does not want to destroy white male gays or white male Jews or white males who convert to Islam or even white males who call themselves Christian but back gay marriage and abortion.

    It really is about hating Christ and the ever distancing Christendom. The hatred for whites generally is because whites built and maintained Christendom. Whites who make it clear that they wish to sodomize and effeminize and Judaize and Islamicize – and abort – what is left of Christendom are fully welcomed in the Left and are almost all its most important leaders.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I agree. Race is a tool. (It can perfectly well be a tool even if you are a realist about racial difference, and even if you are a realist about the fact that many powerful Jews actually do work together, on some level, in ways that undermine the broader society in which they live).
    Race agitators are tools. "Conniving Jews" are tools. Even "money grubbing" capitalists are tools. What ultimately drives things is the hint of sexual license. It is rarely realized. It is NEVER fully realized. But if religion recedes, and especially Christianity, which seems to promise a place in the concrete world, and in eternity, for humans as physical and creative and productive beings, the drive for such things becomes, quite easily, a drive for unlicensed sexuality. If that possibility disappears, life will appear meaningless.

    Harvey Weinstein can f*** all the starlets if he supports "the right to choose". Bill Clinton can stick it where he wants. Nobody hates the "good" white men, the powerful white men, the white men who can make women feel like they really exist. ALL women like them. (Well, not really, but...)

    Here is an interesting angle on the Battle of the Lincoln Memorial (no one really seems to have put forth a good name for the thing...): has anyone considered the idea that ALL participants might actually be in agreement on something they each regard as DEEPLY important and on which society objects?
    We know what the Covington boys think about killing babies? Yeah, maybe they are "brainwashed" and wanted to "be boys" and have a fun outing, but I suspect the vast majority of them would love to meet a nice girl and repeatedly impregnate her and have many children.
    What about the Black Hebrews? I have no citations, but I am quite confident that they would regard killing black children as an abomination foisted on them by whitey. I bet all of them would gladly leave the street preaching in a moment if they had black women who were inclined towards their brand of myth-making, and would take it is an injunction and rationale to make babies.
    And what of "Elder" Phillips? He is trying to play the media game, and who knows what he might have been quoted saying somewhere, but he clearly just makes sh*t up. Does anyone really doubt that inwardly he feels some genuine pull towards some authentic Indian life, and would find the killing of Indian babies some abomination crafted by the white man?

    So... a clash between whites and blacks and Indians, all of whom inwardly yearn to raise children with real women... who benefits? Perhaps the guys who think they have a fighting chance to pump and dump the hottest sluts, and to realize whatever even more perverse sexual desires lurk within.

    Yes, white men are the enemy. But that is because white men have historically been the best at constructing and fighting for an alternative. And everyone kind of knows this.
    , @MBlanc46
    That might—might—be the case now. Don’t count on it being the case next week.
  120. “Freud came up with a lot of bad ideas, but one of his better ones is “projection”: Human beings defend themselves by attributing their own bad traits to others.”

    True.

    And nobody projects with such hypocritical fury remotely close to Jews.

  121. @Paleo Liberal
    Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    Occam’s Butterknife in action, folks.

  122. @anon
    Good article, but one correction: It's HoloDoMor, not HoloMoDor.
    From Russian/Ukrainian "golod" (pronounced "holod" in the Ukrainian dialect): hunger + "moritj": kill slowly, by deprivation.

    An understandable Tolkienian slip, perhaps – Holomo(r)dor.

  123. Sounds like there’s a coup in Venezuela. I assume the CIA are the organisers though I may be wrong – Venezuela seems to be off the radar these days.

    A long time back, but I read an interesting passage in that great flying memoir Fate Is The Hunter, where the author had to fly a new plane down to Brazil in the 30s and was nearly killed when the plane was sabotaged at a remote staging airfield (someone put a pint of water in the engine which blew off the oil filler when it turned to steam).

    It turned out that in the mid-30s South American passenger flights were dominated by German airplanes, airlines and pilots, and the American government used all its considerable clout to replace them with American airlines, aircraft and pilots. The author was delivering a plane to Rio.

    The State Department had finally become alarmed at the domination of South American airlines by the Germans. They were particularly strong in Brazil, Colombia and Bolivia. They hired every (South American) national they could to aid their own pilots and technicians, and then they hired relatives of those already employed. And then they hired the relatives of the relatives. Thus the Germans and nationalised Germans, who had never really forsaken the fatherland, became an extremely popular force throughout South America…

    It would be better if you left – better if you had never come. Because of you many people have lost their jobs, and a job anywhere in South America is a precious thing… I am probably the only person in Bolivia who is happy to see you. Even so I advise you to be careful. Most people here and in Brazil would prefer to see you fail. Some of them may even help you to fail. You can think as you please, but don’t forget about the devil.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    And now I know why - they're fixing their oil prices in renminbi. This is like when Saddam set his oil prices in Euros (Foreign Policy magazine said it was a conspiracy theory that it caused the US invasion).

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-oil/venezuela-publishes-oil-prices-in-chinese-currency-to-shun-u-s-dollar-idUSKCN1BQ2D1

    Blue check twitter is 100% supportive of the coup by the look of it.

  124. @An Immigrant
    All I can say is that
    "It is just the beginning".
    America's future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    "White man White woman couples" are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    “Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa.”

    Our country is run by WASP Elites and their allies, preponderantly Jews. They are not primitive, but they know how to use the primitive to serve them as tools and weapons against the vast majority of white Gentiles.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Our country is run by WASP Elites and their allies, preponderantly Jews.
     
    Could you list 5 of these Anglo Saxon elites?

    And would you please desist from using the racial epithet "WASP"?

    , @syonredux

    “Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa.”

    Our country is run by WASP Elites and their allies, preponderantly Jews.
     
    When was the last time the WASP elite was in charge? The early '60s? Jews have been the senior partner for quite some time now.....
  125. @The Anti-Gnostic
    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    Sovereignty is always consensus by the majority. When the majority of the Soviets no longer believed in the Soviet Union, it disappeared. NATO gave Gaddafi a push, and his regime--and his whole artificial country--toppled over. When the Baltics asked the Russians to leave, they did. Russians don't really have it in them to go full-Pizarro any more.

    ISIS very nearly had their own country, but violent, consumptive religions don't do well turning young people into spouses and parents, which is really all it's all about. ISIS just doesn't have the numbers, so they don't get sovereignty.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 - 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative "Gandhiism" will be crushed.

    Camps/prisons, Deportation, End Visa issuance.

    The new segregation. You homo/pedo/diversity operators want eliminationist rhetoric you got it from the primary source.

  126. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That’s why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.
     
    LOL. Hillary won the popular vote. The Electoral College is why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    Did Trump spend a lot of effort winning the votes of Californians? Why not?

  127. @Paleo Liberal
    Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    Yours is a perfect post to come from one of our many Leftist organizations. You play the role of ‘reasonable’ Liberal well, which might lead to people putting their guards down, and then you drop this insanity that could come from any Neocon or any Leftist Jewish organization: “The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.”

    The most vocal and prolific BLM posters, in order: gay blacks, the black academic beneficiaries of affirmative action, Jews, Moslems, gay whites.

  128. @YetAnotherAnon
    Sounds like there's a coup in Venezuela. I assume the CIA are the organisers though I may be wrong - Venezuela seems to be off the radar these days.

    A long time back, but I read an interesting passage in that great flying memoir Fate Is The Hunter, where the author had to fly a new plane down to Brazil in the 30s and was nearly killed when the plane was sabotaged at a remote staging airfield (someone put a pint of water in the engine which blew off the oil filler when it turned to steam).

    It turned out that in the mid-30s South American passenger flights were dominated by German airplanes, airlines and pilots, and the American government used all its considerable clout to replace them with American airlines, aircraft and pilots. The author was delivering a plane to Rio.


    The State Department had finally become alarmed at the domination of South American airlines by the Germans. They were particularly strong in Brazil, Colombia and Bolivia. They hired every (South American) national they could to aid their own pilots and technicians, and then they hired relatives of those already employed. And then they hired the relatives of the relatives. Thus the Germans and nationalised Germans, who had never really forsaken the fatherland, became an extremely popular force throughout South America...

    "It would be better if you left - better if you had never come. Because of you many people have lost their jobs, and a job anywhere in South America is a precious thing... I am probably the only person in Bolivia who is happy to see you. Even so I advise you to be careful. Most people here and in Brazil would prefer to see you fail. Some of them may even help you to fail. You can think as you please, but don't forget about the devil."
     

    And now I know why – they’re fixing their oil prices in renminbi. This is like when Saddam set his oil prices in Euros (Foreign Policy magazine said it was a conspiracy theory that it caused the US invasion).

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-oil/venezuela-publishes-oil-prices-in-chinese-currency-to-shun-u-s-dollar-idUSKCN1BQ2D1

    Blue check twitter is 100% supportive of the coup by the look of it.

  129. @Tiny Duck
    What ive learened

    1. conservative whites love playing the victim

    2. conservatives believe in lies and gaslight

    3. conservatives will excuse evil behavior from white children

    4. conservatives are violent and hate filled

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    Ohs Tinys……

    I caint’s want to give you’n the “ultimit punishmint” tonights!

    Lendert “He be serious dis tyme” Plitss

  130. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    1. Weren’t the Minutemen of 1775?
     
    That is the significant date. Rare oversight by Steve. I’m disappointed he’s not making a point to read every single one of my comments. :)

    Few may now remember The Minutemen of 2005, designated by some a revival of the 1990s right-wing militia movement, and certainly with undertones thereof at the least. They were a self-appointed civilian auxiliary to the border patrol.

    Not sure what happened to them. They were subject to nonstop hate-based attacks.

    They emerged right at an opportune time, the period o “peak amnesty risk” (the high water mark of which, IMO, was May 2006) and deserve a mention in any history of the Defeat of Amnesty of that era.

    • Replies: @Hail
    Two iSteve mentions of the Minutemen of 2005, from the pre-commenting era:

    - Law & Order v. the Minutemen: The crime drama did a thinly veiled depiction of the Minutemen. They were the villains. (The shock of the century, I know.)

    - It Must be a Cold Day in Hell: In which Steve celebrates a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed supportive of the Minutemen.

    The link to that Op-Ed is long dead, but Archive.org has the original.

    Here is beginning of that Op-Ed:


    Minutemen Are People, Too
    Arizona rednecks win a round against the ACLU.

    BY LEO W. BANKS
    Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT

    TUCSON, Ariz.--Anybody who appreciates a good yuck was sad to see the Minutemen pack up their pickups and go home. After all, it wasn't every day that we got to enjoy the spectacle of sunscreen-lathered ACLU observers chasing volunteer border-watchers through the desert. But in the media bonfire accompanying Arizona's Redneck Revolt, we saw the cultural divide separating media elites from ordinary people--those with BlackBerries and $150 hairdos versus folks with tobacco bulges in their cheeks.

    In the view of most of the reporters who parachuted into Arizona for this story and, disturbingly, local ones as well, you'd get the distinct impression that the Minutemen are the problem along the border. That's right. America needn't worry about the thousands who bust into the country every night. No, the real danger are those yahoos who think calling the cops when they see somebody breaking the law is a good idea.

    Never mind that it worked, more or less. In April, the number of illegals coming across along the Naco corridor, where the Minutemen were stationed, fell [....]
     

    Who is Leo W. Banks? Where is he today?

    Luck would have it that he runs a website called LeoWBanks.com which explains it all. To bring this back full-circle to the Minutemen of 1775 and to the state (or "commonwealth") of Massachusetts, look where Leo W. Banks is from:


    LEO TALKS TO HIMSELF

    Where were you born?
    In South Boston. In a brick apartment building called Lennon Court.

    What memories do you have of Massachusetts?
    Snow and nuns, often on the same day.
     

    Sadly, he will never see this, because he also includes this statement:

    Reading the comments is like walking into a biker bar wearing an Armani suit. It doesn't end well.
     
  131. @syonredux

    While in broad and nationwide terms Steve’s statement is definitely correct

    The Minutemen were Massachusetts-specific.
     

    Except, as noted above, Steve is using Minuteman as a generic label for men who are White, heterosexual, gun-owning, Christian (esp Protestant), etc.

    Steve did something similar a while back when he talked about how SJW hatred for a given category can be ranked according to how many points in common the group has with James Watt.

    And the Minuteman symbol works pretty well. I mean, talk about bad optics......

    http://www.stevestravelguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Minuteman-Statue-on-Lexington-Battle-Green.jpg

    Except that by then the average New Englander of pure WASP stock was fully a heretic of the worst sort and already given to backing almost all crazy Liberal notions in cultural and political matters as long as they were not seen as being imposed by non-New Englanders of pure WASP stock.

    • Replies: @syonredux

    Except that by then the average New Englander of pure WASP stock was fully a heretic of the worst sort and already given to backing almost all crazy Liberal notions in cultural and political matters
     
    Dunno......New England in the 18th century was pretty conservative....Cf John Adams vs Thomas Jefferson....And the conservative strain in New England thought contains a lot of distinguished names: Nathaniel Hawthorne, James Russell Lowell, Henry Adams, Ralph Adams Cram, Lovecraft, TS Eliot (born in Missouri, but of New England stock), Lothrop Stoddard, .....
  132. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?
     
    Young Alyssa Milano? Maybe. Aging Alyssa? Hmmm.

    https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/08/AlyssaMilanorussia1.jpg

    Wow, she has not aged well. Neither has Ashley Judd. All that real hate is obviously not good for you. She has that dead eye look of a mass murderer.

  133. @Lot
    "obviously a manufactured controversy "

    The initial video was from instagram, but a now suspended Russian twitter (claiming to be a California teacher and using the image of a Brazilian woman) edited it down deceptively, gave it the inflammatory headline, and made it viral. The account posted 130 times per day on average.

    Same thing they did in 2016, stoking BLM and police shooting articles.

    The initial video was from instagram, but a now suspended Russian twitter

    Those pesky Russians. Sure the true source wasn’t deep state types making it look like “the Russians”?

    • Replies: @AnonAnon
    The follow-on comments are interesting: https://twitter.com/pollyspin/status/1087582878001700865?s=21

    Archive of the tweet here: https://archive.is/jnVKJ
    , @snorlax

    Sure the true source wasn’t deep state types making it look like "the Russians"?
     
    Yes, because it's extremely embarrassing to the left.
  134. @Jack D
    You play it just like those white boys did - you don't take the bait, you don't fall for the provocation. Yes, they were condemned anyway in the short run but (and this is driving the Left even more wild) in the longer cycle they won the confrontation. Nothing will change the mind of the most extreme, out of touch with reality Leftists but most reasonable people now understand that the initial picture presented of evil whites who might as well have been wearing KKK hoods and robes was not truthful - at a minimum the situation was "more complicated". Each time one of these hate hoaxes is perpetrated and then turns out to be a dud, it diminishes the impact of the tactic. Yes, the media keeps trying to memory hole them, but ordinary people are not idiots and remember and take media accounts nowadays with a grain of salt.

    Now the media keeps trying to flip the script and tell us that white teenagers from the sticks are really the "privileged" so that it is ok to punch "up" at them (while billionaires are the "oppressed") but people are not going to accept such topsy-turvy thinking in the long run. And as Gandhi showed, when confronted by bullying you lose if you punch back no matter how many times you are provoked - the way to gain sympathy is to maintain the high ground and make the bully look bad.

    I’d say most ordinary people in the FUSA are idiots (if you are including all the non-White males).

    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
    The preferred nomenclature is... wrote:

    I’d say most ordinary people in the FUSA are idiots (if you are including all the non-White males).
     
    Well... almost everyone has one or two minor little personal idiocies!

    But, no, by and large, the human species did not survive by mainly being idiots. They're not idiots: they're afraid.

    They see what happened to Jim Watson and Larry Summers and they are afraid.

    But reigns of terror can end very rapidly, as it becomes clear to the majority of sane people that they have all had enough and they start rising up together and end the insanity.

    The Left does not actually control the equivalent of the NKVD or the Gestapo or the Committee of Public Safety. They are simply relying on incredible cowardice and spinelessness among the mid-level apparatchiks. Once a few people stand up to them and survive, the terror can end.

    These kids from Covington Catholic High are actually starting to point the way. Savannah Guthrie tried to bully Nick Sandmann into falsely confessing to wrongdoing, but he, respectfully, declined:


    As far as standing there, I had every right to do so. My position is that I was not disrespectful to Mr. Phillips. I respect him. I’d like to talk to him...But I can't say that I'm sorry for listening to him and standing there.
     
    Sometimes, adults can learn from the kids.
  135. @Hail
    Few may now remember The Minutemen of 2005, designated by some a revival of the 1990s right-wing militia movement, and certainly with undertones thereof at the least. They were a self-appointed civilian auxiliary to the border patrol.

    Not sure what happened to them. They were subject to nonstop hate-based attacks.

    They emerged right at an opportune time, the period o "peak amnesty risk" (the high water mark of which, IMO, was May 2006) and deserve a mention in any history of the Defeat of Amnesty of that era.

    Two iSteve mentions of the Minutemen of 2005, from the pre-commenting era:

    Law & Order v. the Minutemen: The crime drama did a thinly veiled depiction of the Minutemen. They were the villains. (The shock of the century, I know.)

    It Must be a Cold Day in Hell: In which Steve celebrates a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed supportive of the Minutemen.

    The link to that Op-Ed is long dead, but Archive.org has the original.

    Here is beginning of that Op-Ed:

    [MORE]

    Minutemen Are People, Too
    Arizona rednecks win a round against the ACLU.

    BY LEO W. BANKS
    Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT

    TUCSON, Ariz.–Anybody who appreciates a good yuck was sad to see the Minutemen pack up their pickups and go home. After all, it wasn’t every day that we got to enjoy the spectacle of sunscreen-lathered ACLU observers chasing volunteer border-watchers through the desert. But in the media bonfire accompanying Arizona’s Redneck Revolt, we saw the cultural divide separating media elites from ordinary people–those with BlackBerries and $150 hairdos versus folks with tobacco bulges in their cheeks.

    In the view of most of the reporters who parachuted into Arizona for this story and, disturbingly, local ones as well, you’d get the distinct impression that the Minutemen are the problem along the border. That’s right. America needn’t worry about the thousands who bust into the country every night. No, the real danger are those yahoos who think calling the cops when they see somebody breaking the law is a good idea.

    Never mind that it worked, more or less. In April, the number of illegals coming across along the Naco corridor, where the Minutemen were stationed, fell [….]

    Who is Leo W. Banks? Where is he today?

    Luck would have it that he runs a website called LeoWBanks.com which explains it all. To bring this back full-circle to the Minutemen of 1775 and to the state (or “commonwealth”) of Massachusetts, look where Leo W. Banks is from:

    LEO TALKS TO HIMSELF

    Where were you born?
    In South Boston. In a brick apartment building called Lennon Court.

    What memories do you have of Massachusetts?
    Snow and nuns, often on the same day.

    Sadly, he will never see this, because he also includes this statement:

    Reading the comments is like walking into a biker bar wearing an Armani suit. It doesn’t end well.

  136. Have been reading your blog for a time, have found your take interesting, and have often wondered why you are lumped in with the alt-right extremists.

    Your Taki distinction of Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up – a very pernicious analysis.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    "Alt-right" does not have a very clear meaning and its usage suggests this will not resolve soon. Reasonable people use it to mean something like paleocon or not-neocon, Richard Spencer copyrighted it so it could only refer to himself, and pinkhairs use it to mean whatever they do not like.
    , @Anonymous

    Your Taki distinction of Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up – a very pernicious analysis.
     
    What do you mean by pernicious?
    , @vinteuil

    Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up – a very pernicious analysis.
     
    Steve Sailer is so very, very naughty. Sometimes, he's even pernicious!
  137. anon[312] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic
    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    Sovereignty is always consensus by the majority. When the majority of the Soviets no longer believed in the Soviet Union, it disappeared. NATO gave Gaddafi a push, and his regime--and his whole artificial country--toppled over. When the Baltics asked the Russians to leave, they did. Russians don't really have it in them to go full-Pizarro any more.

    ISIS very nearly had their own country, but violent, consumptive religions don't do well turning young people into spouses and parents, which is really all it's all about. ISIS just doesn't have the numbers, so they don't get sovereignty.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 - 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative "Gandhiism" will be crushed.

    What? The vast majority of Russians (and therefore, of Soviets) very much believed in the Soviet Union and still do. Whether it was under the guise of Soviet Union or Greater Russia did not much matter. What broke it apart was the outlying nations acting boldly and Gorbachev being unwilling to engage in mass killings of pro-independence protesters, though some tens of them did get killed at various protests.

  138. @AnonAnon

    The initial video was from instagram, but a now suspended Russian twitter
     
    Those pesky Russians. Sure the true source wasn’t deep state types making it look like “the Russians”?

    The follow-on comments are interesting: https://twitter.com/pollyspin/status/1087582878001700865?s=21

    Archive of the tweet here: https://archive.is/jnVKJ

  139. @Charles Erwin Wilson 3
    Gandhi faced the British, a fundamentally moral people. Do you think that is what we face with the Left?

    Gandhi faced the British, a fundamentally moral people. Do you think that is what we face with the Left?

    Yes, and with a reasonably fair press. And still they didn’t get the Brits out of their country until the Brits
    — had just fought a war where the casus belli–and moral justification–was the Germans being in other people’s countries
    — and were bankrupt.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    And still they didn’t get the Brits out of their country until the Brits
     
    The Brits weren't trying to replace or destroy them.
    , @byrresheim
    It was not, and please do educate yourself, do not take my word for it, Gandhi, who made the bloodsucking pirateas hastily leave the subcontinent they had plundered for two centuries, but the fact that their colonial military, nearly completely indigenous up to and including company level officers, was on the brink of rebellion.

    It did not help matters that the Japanese had crushed the myth of British invincibility quite thoroughly.

    How it came to pass that the Japanese, up to then doing the pirates' bidding in Asia turned upon their erstwhile British friends and military suppliers is yet another ignored but highly interesting story. The British have numerous reasons to rethink their view of Churchill and his contemporaries, this being one of them.
  140. I call bragging rights: I was *at* the Basilica on Saturday night. I met the protesters on their way up the hill toward the Basilica stairs. I waited three whole days before the story broke in the media. Well, there was an obscure Canadian Broadcasting Corporation story on Sunday.

    And those protesters were *loud.* Drumming and shrieking.

    Also, OT: I don’t see any stories on this blog about Dan-el Padilla Peralta the illegal alien/classicist at the center of the Society for Classical Studies’ implosion two weeks ago:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan-el_Padilla_Peralta#Racist_attack

    Did I miss the story?

  141. @Paleo Liberal
    Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    The only disharmony between white and red is what was ginned up by a proven liar who spreads disharmony for a living when he’s not tactically operating operationally on refrigeration equipment.
    BLM (and other groups like By Any Means Necessary) are domestic terrorist groups that get a free pass from the law enforcement agencies of several cities and unlimited money from hostile foreigners — such groups will always be far more important than a twitter account which has no power if you ignore it and which only showed up where things were already popping off. Anyone who talks about some harmless free speech “fanning the flames,” but has no interest in the arsonist with the armload of Molotovs directly causing the literal flames, is suspiciously myopic.

  142. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    You observe well. There is no path forward for your people without a non-trivial elite cohort supporting you. If I were a white American, I would be planning my family’s exit strategy.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    If I were a white American, I would be planning my family’s exit strategy.
     
    What do you mean?
    , @istevefan

    If I were a white American, I would be planning my family’s exit strategy.
     
    Why? Where else would you go that is not undergoing a similar rot? Besides, there are well over 100 million whites in the USA who disagree with the way things are going, and we are the most heavily armed civilian population in the history of the world. It would seem silly to just abandon the place. In fact Whites in America have a better chance at surviving than most other Whites simply because of our numbers and the 2nd Amendment that other Whites lack.

    What we are seeing now is essentially a one-sided cold war in which the other side has gotten a free ride due to the overwhelming majority of American Whites who believe in the founding principles. Therefore, we have played by rules that the Left long ago abandoned. We are slowly figuring this out.

    We also are slowly figuring out that the Left derives most of its power through us. It is our reaction that gives them power. They have crafted words and concepts like 'racism' and 'white privilege' to use against us, and we willingly submit to those charges. We have yet to collectively tell them to fu*k off, or even to use our enormous economic clout to bring down companies who push the Leftist line. So long as we play by their rules, we lose. So long as we feed globo-homo with our dollars, we lose. It's that simple.

    It's like how everyone was afraid of the Wizard of Oz until they pulled back the curtain and saw behind it. Right now most Whites are afraid. But that is changing. Once a critical mass is reached, it will change real fast.

  143. @Simon
    Dennis Dale means “free rein” — not, for God’s sake, “free reign."

    Doh! Damn. It’s a tweet too. Can’t even fix it. You get the idea.

    Thanks Steve.

    • Replies: @Keypusher
    The thing is “free reign” really does express the meaning of the phrase better than the correct “free rein” does. That’s why that mistake gets made so often.
  144. @Hypnotoad666

    “Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing.”
     
    Yes, this is very iSteve, and I have to guess he will do a post on it when he gets a chance.

    The Complaint filed by the DOL is interesting due to its internal incoherence and its mangling of statistics. Basically, it says that Oracle prefers Asians, who make up 75 percent of its workforce. Yet Oracle is supposedly also discriminating against Asians because, on average, they make 4% less pay than the 25% of the workforce which is white.

    The Complaint also bizarrely alleges discrimination against "women," without noting how many women are Asian vs. White. This completely confuses their race and gender arguments.

    the entire H1B visa program needs to be abolished because it discriminates against women…Those running the INS must be held accountable and prosecuted for their sexist program which grants 75% of the H1B visas to men. It is surprising than none of the female candidates running for President has held the INS accountable for their blatant sexism.

  145. Upton Sinclair observed, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!” Not surprisingly, many in the Democratic-media complex misunderstood the video of the besieged boy acting classy as yet more evidence of the white wickedness for which they hope to be rewarded for uncovering.

    Do you really think they are stupid, that they do not know what they are doing, that nobody is telling them what to do?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    They are opportunists with a racial agenda.
  146. • Replies: @TheBoom
    Godfrey lives
    , @TWS
    Why are we stuck maroons and boors but no Godfrey Elfwick?
  147. @Paleo Liberal
    Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    Agree, except there is no connection to South America other than that is where the woman whose profile pic the suspended account used was from.

    Every indication is that it was a Russian agent fanning radical minority anger as they did in 2016.

    • Replies: @Issac
    That seems like the sort of thing Twitter would like to sound off about. Why silently delete the account instead? And if the US elite hate the division sown by Russia, why are they allowing all these Russian accomplices in hollywood, news media, social media, etc. to go unpunished? Surely they are capable of making an example of a leftist fanatic to discourage this sort of behavior.

    But they don't do any such thing... curious.
    , @J.Ross
    If fanning minority anger is suddenly an issue does it mean we will be going after any of the Americans who do it for a living?
    , @Trevor H.

    Every indication is that it was a Russian agent
     
    I like your sense of humor!
  148. @Lot
    Agree, except there is no connection to South America other than that is where the woman whose profile pic the suspended account used was from.

    Every indication is that it was a Russian agent fanning radical minority anger as they did in 2016.

    That seems like the sort of thing Twitter would like to sound off about. Why silently delete the account instead? And if the US elite hate the division sown by Russia, why are they allowing all these Russian accomplices in hollywood, news media, social media, etc. to go unpunished? Surely they are capable of making an example of a leftist fanatic to discourage this sort of behavior.

    But they don’t do any such thing… curious.

  149. Every indication is that it was a Russian agent fanning radical minority anger as they did in 2016.

    You spelled George Soros wrong.

  150. @Paleo Liberal
    Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    >#4 includes a large group.

    True, but don’t underestimate #3, either. I never fully appreciated until recently how many wackos the US has. Politics is the excuse to let go of their wackiness, not the other way around.

    And yes, I agree. I actually think the indigenous peoples of America send more people into the military per capita than any other ethnic group. Fits in well with the martial streak in their various cultures, and for young people unlucky enough to be on a reservation with some ambition, offers a ticket out.

    >The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    Putin is profoundly a-ideological when it comes to foreign support-as long as it benefits the Kremlin, he’ll bankroll anybody, no matter how personally bizarre he and his cronies would probably privately find them. See the simultaneous support of SYRIZA along with the FN.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    And yes, I agree. I actually think the indigenous peoples of America send more people into the military per capita than any other ethnic group.
     
    I doubt it's more than White Southerners, another conquered people.
  151. @The Anti-Gnostic
    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    Sovereignty is always consensus by the majority. When the majority of the Soviets no longer believed in the Soviet Union, it disappeared. NATO gave Gaddafi a push, and his regime--and his whole artificial country--toppled over. When the Baltics asked the Russians to leave, they did. Russians don't really have it in them to go full-Pizarro any more.

    ISIS very nearly had their own country, but violent, consumptive religions don't do well turning young people into spouses and parents, which is really all it's all about. ISIS just doesn't have the numbers, so they don't get sovereignty.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 - 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative "Gandhiism" will be crushed.

    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    So do we. And our numbers include the people who are probably the most heavily armed civilian population in human history.

  152. @An Immigrant
    All I can say is that
    "It is just the beginning".
    America's future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    "White man White woman couples" are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin

    No, they won’t. It’s the rich who are in charge of all this. They’re calling the shots. They’re financing the Coalition of the Fringes. Wealth is most definitely not going to be seized.

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.
     
    Uh, nope. The whole point of identity politics is for one identity group to smash rival identity groups.
    , @utu

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized.
     
    I agree though some minor rearrangements are possible to make some subgroups of foot soldiers more happy.
    , @obwandiyag
    Exactly. Precisely. You have put your finger exactly on it.

    But don't hold your breath until the readers on this dumb blog catch on to the truth of your simple truth. They are, get this, CONGENITALLY incapable of understanding such a simple but true concept, because they are ruled by their snake-brain prejudices like worms.
  153. @Chaotic Neutral
    I thought this entire affair was so stupid and obviously a manufactured controversy that I was going to ignore it, but now that the details are out, I think it has a more sinister connotation. What the media and leftists are attempting to do is bully any organized right wing or republican political activism. By showcasing these students on national media and demonizing them, the establishment is exposing them to future leftist harassment and even attack. I’m sure that smirking boy will have less success than comparable students in the college application process now. Perhaps all Covington students will now! There are probably loony leftists apparatchiks at every school just licking their lips with eagerness for their applications to arrive!

    When parents and administrators realize this, they will in the future be reluctant to bring students to rallies or political events realizing the prudence of laying low. It’s sort of like a small scale Charlottesville. Rightist will demur from public demonstration for fear of leftist bullying.

    What the media and leftists are attempting to do is bully any organized right wing or republican political activism.

    It’s more that they are determined to demonstrate that only approved political activism is permitted. And non-approved political activism, of either the right or the left, is forbidden. All political activism must follow the script.

    All dissent, from left or right, is going to be crushed.

  154. @AnotherDad

    Gandhi faced the British, a fundamentally moral people. Do you think that is what we face with the Left?
     
    Yes, and with a reasonably fair press. And still they didn't get the Brits out of their country until the Brits
    -- had just fought a war where the casus belli--and moral justification--was the Germans being in other people's countries
    -- and were bankrupt.

    And still they didn’t get the Brits out of their country until the Brits

    The Brits weren’t trying to replace or destroy them.

  155. @nebulafox
    >#4 includes a large group.

    True, but don't underestimate #3, either. I never fully appreciated until recently how many wackos the US has. Politics is the excuse to let go of their wackiness, not the other way around.

    And yes, I agree. I actually think the indigenous peoples of America send more people into the military per capita than any other ethnic group. Fits in well with the martial streak in their various cultures, and for young people unlucky enough to be on a reservation with some ambition, offers a ticket out.

    >The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    Putin is profoundly a-ideological when it comes to foreign support-as long as it benefits the Kremlin, he'll bankroll anybody, no matter how personally bizarre he and his cronies would probably privately find them. See the simultaneous support of SYRIZA along with the FN.

    And yes, I agree. I actually think the indigenous peoples of America send more people into the military per capita than any other ethnic group.

    I doubt it’s more than White Southerners, another conquered people.

  156. @istevefan
    South African whites are tremendously outnumbered. US Whites are not. There are close to 195 million of us. Even accounting for self-hating Whites, there are still well over 100 million.

    If a group that large gets run over by the coalition of the fringes, then it deserves it. For our opponents are not some cohesive, well-oiled machine like conquerors of the past. No, our foes are dregs and degenerates who have little to no martial skills at all.

    Check out the photos sometimes of those reporters and others who blabber about replacing us. Not exactly people to worry about. E.g. check out photos of that Alex chick in a prior post. After seeing her you sort of feel ashamed for having taken her seriously.

    We have the advantage of knowing what is in the hearts and minds of our foes. We have the advantage of facing such a sorry coalition. We have numbers too. If we end up like South African Whites, we will have deserved it.

    Huh? Trump did better than Romney across the entire South, with the exception of Mississippi and Virginia (which can hardly be called Southern nowadays). His gains compared to Romney were especially significant in Florida.

    You’re right about underperformance in a bunch of random Western/Plains states though.

  157. Actually…it’s really about race.

    No, it’s about power and money.

    Are you familiar with Spandrell’s theory of bioleninism? According to this theory the Coalition of the Fringes is held together by fear and dependence. What the globalist elites want from their foot soldiers is not competence but blind loyalty. Which means that the very hopelessness of these people is their greatest asset. It forces them to be loyal.

    The various groups comprising the Coalition of the Fringes are entirely dependent on patronage from the government and from globalist billionaires. They obey orders became they have no choice. If their cushy bureaucratic and academic sinecures were taken away from them they’d starve.

    Take the TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists). They’re currently getting the daylights kicked out of them for their wicked transphobia. It doesn’t matter. They will remain loyal members of the Coalition of the Fringes because they have nowhere else to go. We’re taking about fat ageing lesbian feminists, entirely unemployable in the real world. If the Women’s Studies departments and the women’s health centres and the rape crisis centres get closed down what the heck are they going to do? And if they’re naughty those jobs will be taken away from them. They’ve already been punished by having their wimmin’s music festivals confiscated.

    What the TERFs are actually going to do is to grovel and beg for forgiveness. They don’t have any choice.

    That’s how the Coalition of the Fringes is held together. And that’s why it’s in no danger of breaking up.

    • Agree: fish, TheBoom
  158. The left has such a cartoonish, simple-minded grasp of human nature that the hate hoaxes they cook up are always easy to spot. They really think Trump voters have white hoods in their closets and go around painting swastikas on the office walls of Jewish professors. I guess it’s not surprising that there’s a lot of overlap between Hollywood and the left. In soap operas, the bad guy is always utterly evil for no reason other than his inherent, inexplicable evilness.

  159. @Lot
    Agree, except there is no connection to South America other than that is where the woman whose profile pic the suspended account used was from.

    Every indication is that it was a Russian agent fanning radical minority anger as they did in 2016.

    If fanning minority anger is suddenly an issue does it mean we will be going after any of the Americans who do it for a living?

  160. Anonymous[261] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Hack
    Your 'victory lap' is well deserved. Although I've been suspicious of the left wing agenda of the mainstream press for a quite a few years, this incident does indeed really help to put things into perspective.

    Those kids really need to take them all to task over this. The black Hebrew Israelites were clearly harassing children with threats of violence, blatant racism, and the like. There are laws against even adults behaving this way towards adults. And if they can get a criminal charge over it, then they can more easily be found guilty in civil court and have to pay the victims. Quite likely, Nathan’s intentional harassment could also follow a similar route, given he intentionally walked over to them, looking to harass them.

    Threats of violence and the like from all the blue checks warrant their own charges. And what about a formal letter to Twitter demanding that the accounts be suspended/closed under Twitter’s own rules? If Twitter demonstrably fails to act, and any one of those people issuing a threat is found guilty in court, Twitter would also be guilty of aiding them in it.

    Similarly the media owes some accountability for recklessly spreading this when it is well known we live in a place and time where death threats and anti-white hatred will be the response.

    We need to set up our own Rightwing Southern Poverty Law Center. You know, one that actually helps these poor Southern white boys in court.

    • Replies: @Autochthon
    I reiterate: This is how you get shit done in federal courts...which means Trump and his people won't be doing any of it.
  161. @The Anti-Gnostic
    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    Sovereignty is always consensus by the majority. When the majority of the Soviets no longer believed in the Soviet Union, it disappeared. NATO gave Gaddafi a push, and his regime--and his whole artificial country--toppled over. When the Baltics asked the Russians to leave, they did. Russians don't really have it in them to go full-Pizarro any more.

    ISIS very nearly had their own country, but violent, consumptive religions don't do well turning young people into spouses and parents, which is really all it's all about. ISIS just doesn't have the numbers, so they don't get sovereignty.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 - 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative "Gandhiism" will be crushed.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 – 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative “Gandhiism” will be crushed.

    Agreed.

    Gandhi could also rely on favourable coverage in the left-wing press.

    The anti-Vietnam War protestors in the late 60s could rely on incredibly favourable coverage in the liberal media.

    Dissidents in the Soviet Union could rely on favourable coverage in the western media. There was no way Solzhenitsyn could be quietly silenced with a bullet to the back of the head.

    Anyone who tries to protest against the current orthodoxy is going to get uniformly hostile media coverage worldwide. It will be explained to the masses that these people are evil racist Nazis. The overwhelming majority of the population will believe this because it’s the only version they’re going to hear. What a handful of people say on Unz Review is irrelevant,. Most people don’t know that Unz Review exists. The few who do know also know that it’s an evil racist Nazi hate site.

    No elite has ever controlled the Megaphone as completely as our current elites do.

  162. Steven Sailor has a punchable white face.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Hi Steve
    , @Anonymous
    Because nothing strikes fear in his heart more than threats by a gay SJW who goes by a handle like Tiny Duck.
  163. Time for America’s Favorite High School boys to file a libel suit in Kentucky against Congresswoman Jihadi Brother-Marriage?

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/23/ilhan-omar-slammed-social-media-attacking-covington-students/

    One of many articles:

    https://www.city-journal.org/html/curious-case-ilhan-omar-14724.html

    Yes, she is still legally married to her brother. Immigration fraud, not incest.

  164. @snorlax

    Scots Irish
     
    There are many Scots-Irish in PA and to a lesser extent Upstate NY, but in New England they're either long ago assimilated to WASPhood or transplants from other states.

    Italians
     
    Italians are indeed the most GOP large group.

    Orthodox Jews
     
    Hasidim bloc vote for Rs at the presidential level and for machine Ds (+incumbent Rs) at the state and congressional level. Modern Orthodox are somewhere between Irish+WASPs and Portuguese+French-Canadians in their voting habits.

    recent East Euro immigrants
     
    Secular ex-Soviet Jews may be the most right-wing ethnocultural group in America, and gentile E. Euro immigrants are quite conservative as well, but neither group is large enough to make much of a difference.

    UCC, UU, and independent congregationalists, all ultra left, even compared to other mainline protestant groups.
     
    WASP long ago became more of a cultural than a religious designation, but mainline Protestant churches indeed range from left (Presbyterians and Methodists) to ultra-left (everything else).

    I am 1/4th Scotch-Irish, and 3/4ths German. I am also the 9th generation in my family to live in my part of rural PA. My family, thanks be to God, is much more rooted than most Americans. I may have to move away someday, though.

    My blood is pretty much the standard for a rural south-central Pennsylvanian.

    There were three main waves of immigrants into the rural agricultural parts of Pennsylvania: the Scotch-Irish; followed about the same time or slightly later by various German-speaking groups; followed in the 1800s by a second and distinct German migration. The second wave of German immigrants, which was the largest across America, was more broadly taken from throughout Germany, whereas the first group was – the true Pennsylvania Dutch – were from the southwest of Germany. There were sprinklings of English around here too. The industrial areas of PA got vastly different ethnic groups, of course.

    The Scotch-Irish here are totally assimilated into Pennsylvania culture.

    The difference is that Pennsylvania culture isn’t liberal WASP New England culture.

    I don’t know enough off the top of my head to examine this distinction further.

    However! I do think there are/were FAR less Scotch-Irish in New England, historically, than there were/are in the South and Midwest. The single largest port of entry for Scotch-Irish was Philadelphia, followed by New York and the Southern ports, with Boston/New England WAAAAAAY behind.

  165. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    It is obligatory now for celebrities to hold and express the correct opinion on gender and race questions and also on passing news items — so my 16-year-old-daughter tells me. I believe it. I think Taylor Swift finally endorsed some Democrats in the last election to squash the completely baseless rumor that she was a trump supporter.

  166. @Mr. Hack
    Your 'victory lap' is well deserved. Although I've been suspicious of the left wing agenda of the mainstream press for a quite a few years, this incident does indeed really help to put things into perspective.

    “Victory lap”? There is no reason to be happy about the Covington situation. The school opened today, under guard. Nathan Phillips is still being treated as an authority. Indian organizations are demonstrating at the school rather than, say, against the Black Israelites who actually disparaged and demeaned them. MSM outlets are discussing whether wearing a MAGA hat is equivalent to wearing a swastika armband, or only 90% as bad. And, you can be certain that school administrators are busy writing “no MAGA hat” provisos into their conduct codes, the First Amendment be damned.

    • Agree: Buffalo Joe
    • Replies: @dfordoom

    “Victory lap”? There is no reason to be happy about the Covington situation. The school opened today, under guard. Nathan Phillips is still being treated as an authority. Indian organizations are demonstrating at the school rather than, say, against the Black Israelites who actually disparaged and demeaned them. MSM outlets are discussing whether wearing a MAGA hat is equivalent to wearing a swastika armband, or only 90% as bad. And, you can be certain that school administrators are busy writing “no MAGA hat” provisos into their conduct codes, the First Amendment be damned.
     
    It always amuses me when dissident rightists claim these things as major victories when in fact they've suffered yet another defeat. But in their imaginations it's a victory. The awesome power of wishful thinking.
  167. Anon spotted:
    “WHITE GENOCIDE NOW!” – 2019 Women’s March in NYC

    In case anyone claims the video has been edited:
    https://video.foxnews.com/v/5991501704001
    https://postimg.cc/Thgjq9dG
    Signholder interviewed

  168. @Tiny Duck
    What ive learened

    1. conservative whites love playing the victim

    2. conservatives believe in lies and gaslight

    3. conservatives will excuse evil behavior from white children

    4. conservatives are violent and hate filled

    5. those kids attacked People of Color

    6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment

    …an evening with Tiny Duck

  169. @Dennis Dale
    Doh! Damn. It's a tweet too. Can't even fix it. You get the idea.

    Thanks Steve.

    The thing is “free reign” really does express the meaning of the phrase better than the correct “free rein” does. That’s why that mistake gets made so often.

    • Replies: @Dennis Dale
    Honestly, if I've ever considered the distinction I've forgotten about it. But it's obvious once you see it.
  170. Folks, it’s over:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-23/millennials-gen-z-support-big-govt-academic-brainwashing-or-young-naivete

    Peaceful separation into various ethno-states appears to be the least horrible of all solutions at this point.

    • Replies: @Hail

    Peaceful separation into various ethno-states
     
    When this happens, of course, it is rarely peaceful.

    And even with the will, it tends to be very hard to vote your way into dissolution.

    , @dfordoom

    Peaceful separation into various ethno-states appears to be the least horrible of all solutions at this point.
     
    It also seems like the least likely solution to be adopted. I'd put the chances at somewhere between zero and none at all.

    Generation Z loves Big Brother. Generation Z loves Diversity. Generation Z thinks homosexuality is awesome. Generation Z knows that a man becomes a woman when he puts on a frock. Generation Z welcomes refugees.

    Generation Z is as dumb as a rock. By mid-century they're going to be running things.

    Be afraid. Be very afraid.
  171. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    Do you really care if you’ve proven their point that you’re “a hater” if after the millionth provocation you strike back?

    Remember this; British intelligence estimates that at its peak, the IRA only had around two hundred active (as in men actually doing the bombing and shooting) members. And yet they were able to force the hand of the much, much stronger British government and military to bend to their will.

    Paying them to behave, sucking up and retreating has only made them angrier and more aggressive. Time to try different tactics.

    Read Siege.

  172. @log

    How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?
     
    The only hope for survival is to implement the teachings of Jesus Christ, as found in Matthew 5-7, and Luke 6:20-49.

    All other courses lead to annihilation.

    The faggy, feminine teachings of Jesus Christ are the main reason we’re in the mess we’re in.

    Please, no more of this turn-the-other-cheek shit.

  173. @Lot
    Agree, except there is no connection to South America other than that is where the woman whose profile pic the suspended account used was from.

    Every indication is that it was a Russian agent fanning radical minority anger as they did in 2016.

    Every indication is that it was a Russian agent

    I like your sense of humor!

  174. @tyrone
    BIG NEWS FLASH TO REAL AMERICA: it's not safe to send your kids to Washington DC anymore.Go somewhere like the Hermitage in TN. and pay respects to a great man who knew how to handle a clapped out old indian…by the way.

    I hate to break it to you but if you are going to Nashville you will be dodging Iraqis and Mexicans as you make your way past the Somali Community Centre.

  175. @Anonymous
    Those kids really need to take them all to task over this. The black Hebrew Israelites were clearly harassing children with threats of violence, blatant racism, and the like. There are laws against even adults behaving this way towards adults. And if they can get a criminal charge over it, then they can more easily be found guilty in civil court and have to pay the victims. Quite likely, Nathan's intentional harassment could also follow a similar route, given he intentionally walked over to them, looking to harass them.

    Threats of violence and the like from all the blue checks warrant their own charges. And what about a formal letter to Twitter demanding that the accounts be suspended/closed under Twitter's own rules? If Twitter demonstrably fails to act, and any one of those people issuing a threat is found guilty in court, Twitter would also be guilty of aiding them in it.

    Similarly the media owes some accountability for recklessly spreading this when it is well known we live in a place and time where death threats and anti-white hatred will be the response.

    We need to set up our own Rightwing Southern Poverty Law Center. You know, one that actually helps these poor Southern white boys in court.

    I reiterate: This is how you get shit done in federal courts…which means Trump and his people won’t be doing any of it.

  176. Anonymous[378] • Disclaimer says:

    Dennis Dale observes:

    … There’s a reason the left projects the charge of the “dog whistle”…. It’s precisely where they’re at, itching to give their animus and hatred free reign.

    Can someone explain to me what this means? I know a dog whistle is a coded message to your followers others don’t notice, but…

    • Replies: @sayless
    Describing some public utterance as a dog whistle can be (not always) a tactic to discredit the plain sense of what has been said.

    For example, if Trump says at a rally in the Rust Belt that the country is being run by globalists “who do not have your best interests at heart”, then he is sending out a dog whistle to the people that Jews are to blame for their economic troubles. He’s stirring up hatred, for political gain.

    Therefore what he said wasn’t meant sincerely, or true; it was just (in fact) anti Semitic manipulation. So he’s discredited, and his listeners are too for agreeing with him, and any person of sound intelligence and good will will understand that what he just said is wrong and bad. What a lot of stupid bigots they must be. What a demagogue he is.

    That’s a real example.

    Because anyone at the rally could have seen, if they’d really given the matter some thought, that the people who are running the country really do have their —the Rust Belt people’s— best interests at heart.

  177. @Paleo Liberal
    Not many people mentioned:

    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    The Russians who were fanning the flames in 2016 were not only posting alt-right comments, but were also the most vocal and most prolific BLM posters.

    There are several types of people who will post truly divisive things.:

    1. Foreign agents who hope to divide Americans
    2. Federal agents provocateur
    3. Whackos
    4. People who stand to profit from division.
    5. Sheep who follow what is considered politically fashionable, not realizing how they are being manipulated

    #4 includes a large group.

    It includes big business that knows a divided people are easily exploited. Why else would big business be so much in favor of immigration from “diverse” places? Because the workers are divided.

    It includes Identity Politicians whose followers are more numerous when there are divisions.

    One can fight racial division better without witch hunts.

    If you have never done so, I would highly recommend going to an Indian Pow Wow sometime.

    Cheap entertainment.
    Tradition is highly regarded. For example, only men can drum. Women never drum. It is not their role.
    Veterans are highly respected. Some events and some roles are for veterans only. For example, if an eagle feather falls and touches the floor, all must be completely silent until a veteran picks it up. None but a warrior may touch it.
    Elders are respected.

    Going to a Pow Wow would do far more to promote harmony between white and red than 1 million tweets.

    Not many people mentioned:
    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.
    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.

    Who cares?

    These people are not the problem. The problem is that liberals crave this stuff, demand it and bathe in it.

    This wasn’t some clever super-duper forgery. They just whacked off the leading context of the video and shipped it. There wasn’t even anything objectionable in the viral video. Even if you believed the worse possible context–the kids “surrounded” the Indians–you’d think, “Ok teenagers. Their school and parents should have a talk with them about both polite behavior and the wisdom of steering clear of activist loons and potential confrontations.” But that was not the reaction of liberals. It was mindless hysteria and hate.

    That’s the problem. Not people “sowing division”. Not “the Russians”. Nope, the problem is the hatred of American elites for regular white Americans. They are the problem. No one else is to blame.

    • Agree: Abe
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Well said, and tomorrow, when my comment clears moderation, you will see that I agree.
    , @Anonymous
    AnotherDad nails it.
    , @MBlanc46
    Another spot-on comment from Another Dad.
  178. One of the first posts here really encapsulated the iSteve worldview in that they’ve “long had suspicions” about the left wing bias of the press. Whoa! NOW they’re realising that the press is a propaganda organ of the Left.

    Many of you guys don’t get it, talking about voting and “sue them” and so on. You literally just lived through an election where a statistically impossible numbers of elections flipped in one direction based off of boxes of ballots being “discovered” on a daily basis. You have a court system that gave a dude trying to escape from an armed mob a 400+ year sentence because a morbidly obese woman had a heart attack, while a guy who attacked a Trump supporter with a bike lock and nearly killed him got time served. That’s just one example.

    Some of you, host included, are hard wired to your 70s version of politics where you think if you just GOTV a little harder you’ll win the war. Ha!

    Not saying its time to clean the guns and go full Brevik, but some candid discussion of where we are going versus this whistling past the graveyard so many of you are doing would be appreciated. You think winning an election is going to walk back us back as a nation from the ledge where multiple well know personalities were calling for violence against children? With the full faith and support of the Cathedral?

    L M A O. You sweet summer children.

    • Replies: @vinteuil

    With the full faith and support of the Cathedral?
     
    Is Jack Hanson, like Unamused & Karl F. Boetel, yet another Mask of Mencius Moldbug?

    The possibility never occurred to me, before.

    Not saying its time to clean the guns and go full Brevik...
     
    A lot of guys seem to be coming awfully close to saying that.
    , @Anonymous

    You have a court system that gave a dude trying to escape from an armed mob a 400+ year sentence because a morbidly obese woman had a heart attack, while a guy who attacked a Trump supporter with a bike lock and nearly killed him got time served. That’s just one example.
     
    The evidence indicates the driver hit the deceased. That doesn't necessarily mean he was guilty of a crime, but you should get your facts straight nonetheless.
  179. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You have to win over the American people, who are fair minded on the whole. That’s why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.
     
    LOL. Hillary won the popular vote. The Electoral College is why Trump is in the White House and not Hillary.

    Jenner, what you say is true and sobering, as usual. But I think you’re avoiding Jack’s point. The goal is not conversion of the enemy, but marginalization.

    Leftists are mostly pussies, but since 2008 they’ve been emboldened by a belief that they have become numerically superior in America. With perceived numbers on their side, and thus (in a mass society) a measure of invulnerability, they’ve gone the route of all weak people who suddenly find themselves with unmerited power: they’ve become martinets and bullies.

    The true believers and drivers on the Left are still not numerically a majority (at least that’s my impression). But the trouble is that most regular people are mere followers and easily cowed into submission and acquiescence, so they go along with whoever is dominant in the culture. For most of them, it was only the advent of Trump that clued them into the fact that there were people who were willing to say “F-you” to the Left.

    Our side needs to detach enough of those “followers” from the Left, capture them for our own side, and (this is key) re-jigger the system to permanently diminish and weaken the fringers. That’s going to be difficult, and possibly futile at this point. But I pray it’s within the realm of possibility—and events like this weekend’s fiasco are a glimmer of hope that some “followers” are waking up.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    Not happening.

    I am surprised at how many "TRUMP IS DOOMED/HAS BETRAYED US FOR THE 20TH TIME THIS WEEK" types around here are suddenly "Well if we message more effectively we can GOTV to more BASED minorities and really show the Left wing what for!" Swallowing whitepills desperately through an ear to ear grin, insisting all is well if we just win another election.

    You guys see the writing on the wall same as I do. You know as well as I do where we are going. The only question is if we get there next week or next year.

    , @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Jenner, what you say is true and sobering, as usual.
     
    Thank you.

    The goal is not conversion of the enemy, but marginalization.
     
    The goal is to win and be in power. By nice means if possible, or not so nice means if necessary. 2020 will be interesting.
    , @TTSSYF
    Yes, exactly. As with just about everything, it's all in the numbers.
  180. Anon[398] • Disclaimer says:

    Caitlin Flanagan of The Atlantic is a Tom Wolfe fan … or an iSteve lurker:

    The full video reveals that these kids had wandered into a Tom Wolfe novel and had no idea how to get out of it.

    She writes 3,500 words on the Covington incident, sympathetic to the students, having watched all the video, including a newly released 2-hour video from the Black Hebrew Israelites.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/media-must-learn-covington-catholic-story/581035/

    [The new video] includes a long, interesting passage, in which the Covington Catholic boys engage in a mostly thoughtful conversation with the Black Hebrew Israelite preacher. Throughout the conversation, they disrespect him only once—to boo him when he says something vile about gays and lesbians.

    She wraps up by throwing the New York Times under the bus:

    How could the elite media—The New York Times, let’s say—have protected themselves from this event, which has served to reinforce millions of Americans’ belief that traditional journalistic outlets are purveyors of “fake news”? They might have hewed to a concept that once went by the quaint term “journalistic ethics.” Among other things, journalistic ethics held that if you didn’t have the reporting to support a story, and if that story had the potential to hurt its subjects, and if those subjects were private citizens, and if they were moreover minors, you didn’t run the story. You kept reporting it; you let yourself get scooped; and you accepted that speed is not the highest value. Otherwise, you were the trash press.

    At 8:30 yesterday morning, as I was typing this essay, The New York Times emailed me. The subject line was “Ethics Reminders for Freelance Journalists.” (I have occasionally published essays and reviews in the Times). It informed me, inter alia, that the Times expected all of its journalists, both freelance and staff, “to protect the integrity and credibility of Times journalism.” This meant, in part, safeguarding the Times’ “reputation for fairness and impartiality.”

    I am prompted to issue my own ethics reminders for The New York Times. Here they are: You were partly responsible for the election of Trump because you are the most influential newspaper in the country, and you are not fair or impartial. Millions of Americans believe you hate them and that you will causally harm them. Two years ago, they fought back against you, and they won. If Trump wins again, you will once again have played a small but important role in that victory.

    • Replies: @vinteuil
    Wow - an Atlantic article that isn't totally full of s*** - that admits a few observations of reality to intrude - you don't see that, every day!
  181. I am AMAZED how fast this went from the top of the news cycle, to OUT of the news cycle.

    This must be some kind of new record!

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Nah, it's pretty standard, when it turns out that the bad guy was of color. See also the Navy Yard shooting.
  182. On Laura Ingraham: Kentucky prosecutors will look into people making terroristic threats against the Covington kids.
    https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/report-multiple-investigations-into-twitter-users-making-terroristic-threats-against-covington-students

  183. @AnotherDad

    Not many people mentioned:
    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.
    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.
     
    Who cares?

    These people are not the problem. The problem is that liberals crave this stuff, demand it and bathe in it.

    This wasn't some clever super-duper forgery. They just whacked off the leading context of the video and shipped it. There wasn't even anything objectionable in the viral video. Even if you believed the worse possible context--the kids "surrounded" the Indians--you'd think, "Ok teenagers. Their school and parents should have a talk with them about both polite behavior and the wisdom of steering clear of activist loons and potential confrontations." But that was not the reaction of liberals. It was mindless hysteria and hate.

    That's the problem. Not people "sowing division". Not "the Russians". Nope, the problem is the hatred of American elites for regular white Americans. They are the problem. No one else is to blame.

    Well said, and tomorrow, when my comment clears moderation, you will see that I agree.

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute

    Well said, and tomorrow, when my comment clears moderation, you will see that I agree.
     
    Wow, Steve must really like you!
  184. @AnotherDad

    Not many people mentioned:
    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.
    There are a number of people, foreign and domestic, who like to fan the flames of division.
     
    Who cares?

    These people are not the problem. The problem is that liberals crave this stuff, demand it and bathe in it.

    This wasn't some clever super-duper forgery. They just whacked off the leading context of the video and shipped it. There wasn't even anything objectionable in the viral video. Even if you believed the worse possible context--the kids "surrounded" the Indians--you'd think, "Ok teenagers. Their school and parents should have a talk with them about both polite behavior and the wisdom of steering clear of activist loons and potential confrontations." But that was not the reaction of liberals. It was mindless hysteria and hate.

    That's the problem. Not people "sowing division". Not "the Russians". Nope, the problem is the hatred of American elites for regular white Americans. They are the problem. No one else is to blame.

    AnotherDad nails it.

  185. @ChrisZ
    Jenner, what you say is true and sobering, as usual. But I think you’re avoiding Jack’s point. The goal is not conversion of the enemy, but marginalization.

    Leftists are mostly pussies, but since 2008 they’ve been emboldened by a belief that they have become numerically superior in America. With perceived numbers on their side, and thus (in a mass society) a measure of invulnerability, they’ve gone the route of all weak people who suddenly find themselves with unmerited power: they’ve become martinets and bullies.

    The true believers and drivers on the Left are still not numerically a majority (at least that’s my impression). But the trouble is that most regular people are mere followers and easily cowed into submission and acquiescence, so they go along with whoever is dominant in the culture. For most of them, it was only the advent of Trump that clued them into the fact that there were people who were willing to say “F-you” to the Left.

    Our side needs to detach enough of those “followers” from the Left, capture them for our own side, and (this is key) re-jigger the system to permanently diminish and weaken the fringers. That’s going to be difficult, and possibly futile at this point. But I pray it’s within the realm of possibility—and events like this weekend’s fiasco are a glimmer of hope that some “followers” are waking up.

    Not happening.

    I am surprised at how many “TRUMP IS DOOMED/HAS BETRAYED US FOR THE 20TH TIME THIS WEEK” types around here are suddenly “Well if we message more effectively we can GOTV to more BASED minorities and really show the Left wing what for!” Swallowing whitepills desperately through an ear to ear grin, insisting all is well if we just win another election.

    You guys see the writing on the wall same as I do. You know as well as I do where we are going. The only question is if we get there next week or next year.

    • Replies: @vinteuil

    You guys see the writing on the wall same as I do. You know as well as I do where we are going. The only question is if we get there next week or next year.
     
    I take it you mean that this is leading to another civil war, with lots of people killing each other?
    , @Anonymous

    You know as well as I do where we are going.
     
    Actually, I, for one, don't know what you mean.
  186. @Suzy
    I am AMAZED how fast this went from the top of the news cycle, to OUT of the news cycle.

    This must be some kind of new record!

    Nah, it’s pretty standard, when it turns out that the bad guy was of color. See also the Navy Yard shooting.

  187. @JimD
    Have been reading your blog for a time, have found your take interesting, and have often wondered why you are lumped in with the alt-right extremists.

    Your Taki distinction of Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up - a very pernicious analysis.

    “Alt-right” does not have a very clear meaning and its usage suggests this will not resolve soon. Reasonable people use it to mean something like paleocon or not-neocon, Richard Spencer copyrighted it so it could only refer to himself, and pinkhairs use it to mean whatever they do not like.

  188. @Anon
    Identity Stalinism or Identity Hitlerism?

    Stalinism was about class war. Who/Whom was determined mainly by class(though 'class' could be defined rather flexibly). After all, peoples of all ethnic backgrounds participated in the Soviet project. Josef Stalin himself was a Georgian working with many non-Russians to rule over the Russian Empire.

    On the other hand, I suppose the current PC is Stalinist in the Orwellian sense because of political fluidity amidst ideological rigidity. In some ways, Stalinism was hard-leftist and Marxist-Leninist, but in the end, whatever Stalin said was the ultimate truth(until Stalin said something else). So, Nazi Germany was enemy forever prior to 1939, friend from 30 to 41, and enemy again from 41 to 45. Such discrepancy was less problematic with fascism that favored ideological 'creativity' and pluralism, aka the Third Position. In contrast, Stalinism claimed to be the highest achievement of Marxist-Leninist ideology but so often deviated from its ideals according to Stalin's whims. And, there is something similar in the politics of the current West. For one thing, the Truth is less about a set of values or principles that the whims of Jewish Personality. So, 'Nationalism good for Israel, bad for Hungary. Nukes good for Israel, bad for Iran. Cheney bad for failed war in Iraq, but Trump also bad for wanting to pull out from Middle East.'
    In some ways, PC is about rigidity of passion. PC folks easily get triggered by the slightest deviance, and yet, rules change so fast that even many PC folks aren't sure of the latest trends and what they're supposed to bark at and when. One difference between Stalinism and Globo-Homo is there was genuine ideological underpinning to communism whereas Globo-Homo is less about ideology than iconography. A kind of ICON Curtain has descended on the West, and that is why the image of the white kid with 'smirk'(looked more like a bemused smile to me) was so triggering. According to PC, white male, esp with MAGA hat, is the Iconic Image of Evil. And that was enough for the Iconoclasmic rage. Iconoclasm is the Rage-Orgasm of the globo-homo progs. Iconography for the good, iconoclasm for the bad. Even the use of terminology is iconocentric in current PC. Marxists spoke of the proletariat and bourgeoisie, terms emphasizing economic stations of peoples. But a term like 'white privilege' conjures White Face as evil. And a term like 'people of color' creates a mental image of people of various races and colors. And it's telling that women are now so much into vagina and even wear 'pussy hats' or clothing shaped like actual poons. Icunts. And when we think of homos, we don't really think of ideas or values. We just think of homo-as-saint characters on TV shows, 'rainbow' flags, and 'gay pride' parades. And homoshering of food is more fun than koshering. We aren't sure which foods are 'kosher' or why, but look at those 'rainbow' pack of Oreo cookies. Right, I just love to bite into food thinking of homos buggering each other or a guy having his penis cut by Frankenstein Medicine.

    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DLW9BFkqxh0/hqdefault.jpg

    The problem for Jews is they don't have much iconic status. They once did as comedians in a more inhibited and cerebral age. Back then, Jews as subversive agents had lots of iconic value as agents for greater liberty. Lenny Bruce wasn't a looker but his foul talk seemed daring. But we now live in a shameless age of cultural filth, and so, no Jewish guy can score points just by being subversive or going on and on about his pud like Philip Roth or Ron Jeremy. And as our culture is anti-intellectual, Jews won't gain much ground by being like Norman Mailer -- novelist and public intellectual -- and Susan Sontag, an essayist who wrote on difficult matters, the Jewish Mind gets less respect. There was a time when the culture made a big deal of Woody Allen trying to make serious movies, the American Bergman. While the culture has grown more uninhibited in terms of sex and violence, it has grown more stunted intellectually due to power of PC and idolatry(over ideology or as the new ideology). Things got so crazy that it takes real courage for someone like Jordan Peterson to say, "Wait a minute.. that man is a man, not a woman." The culture is retarded and anti-intellectual... or it is pseudo-intellectual or schizo-intellectual. It's not sane about anything. Jewish comedians used to score points by using wit to subvert sacred cows. It was easier to do in the past when Sacred Cows were associated with Power, thus 'punching up' to Wasps and White Christians. But now, the Sacred Cows are associated with Powerlessness even though Jews, homos, and blacks have lots of power. Comedians can still beat up on whites, but at this point, it's like beating a dead horse or feeding a fed horse. Norman Mailer warned of the 'fascism of the left' as more dangerous because, traditionally, the left defined itself as the power of freedom against tyranny and repression. But when the struggle itself turns dogmatic and hardline, there is no place to go for freedom. People went to the left for freedom it couldn't find on the right, but if the left is for dogma, then freedom is dead all around. Granted, the dangers of the Left were evident from the beginning with the French Revolution. And Orwell wrote the perfect book on Stalinism or radical leftism as tyranny beyond tyranny. Still, many people in the West chose to believe the failure of Eastern Communism had less to do with ideology than Oriental Despotism of Slavicism.

    Because Jews have less iconic power now, they must maintain grip-and-whip on their proxies with the more iconic or 'idolic' power. They are blacks due to sports and music. And homos for their flaming narcissism. Most POC groups have no iconic power but, as the saying goes, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Diversity has been promoted as an iconic image of New America where All the World is drinking coke and singing(or maybe 'twerking') in perfect harmony. Because Jews control finance, academia, media, deep state, courts, law firms, and most whore politicians, they have lots of tricks to control the dogs. Jews are masters, and their proxies are like dogs. But, dogs are not always easy to train. Sure, you can make them track a scent, but dogs sometimes have a mind of their own.. or they might become distracted by something other than the scent. Or, what if the dogs mistake YOU for the scent. This is problematic for Jews because the 'scent' of whiteness is sometimes detected on Jews by non-whites. "No, bad doggy, my smell is holocausty-whitey, good. Go after nazi-whitey, bad." Also, it takes some time and effort to train dogs. Some of these immigrant groups come from nations where people have been trained to dislike Jews. Now, it's a tall order for Jews to re-train Muslims and such folks to love Jews. But maybe they can be trained to bark and bite so furiously at Bad-whitey that they won't bother with Jewish-whitey. This is why yellow dogs are especially useful. Yellows come with either neutral or pro-Jewish attitudes(because they love to suck up to power), and so, Jews can train them to be like Sarah Jeong. As for folks from Latin America, Jews know they can easily make them bark at Gringo. White Latinos have this envy for Anglo-Americans, and so, Latin whites and Jewish whites make common cause to take more from northern whites. As for the browns, they feel resentment against blanco. It doesn't matter whether it's Latin whites or gringo whites. Even as they want to live under richer gringos, they are filled with inferiority complex, and Jews play on that. But Muslims and blacks are problematic dogs to train. Muslims have a very proud religion that isn't about turn-the-other-cheek. Also, POC ideology actually favors them against Jews in a way. Many folks around the world see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as WHITE Jewish colonialists vs brown oppressed. As for blacks, they are dawgs than dogs, or dogs-with-attitude. Unlike yellow dogs and brown dogs, blacks are not easy to train. They like to let the good rabbits run and chase after them. Also, as dawgs are semi-wolf-like in aggression, they get pissed if the master demands too much. Or black dawgs go too far with the aggression. When the Jewish master tells black dawgs to bark at whitey, he doesn't necessarily mean that they should run wild and burn down entire cities, messing things up for gentrification as well. But black dawgs often get out of control, as with BLM fiasco. (So, Jews have been trying to spin it as controlled by Russia.)

    Jewish Power is crucial in the equation because the elites get to call the shots through control of the Megaphone and Methadone. Jews can rouse people to hatred or soothe them with happy feely stuff. Take the Women's March. Why was it shut down for being 'antisemitic' but not 'anti-Palestinian'? After all, many Jewish women in feminism support Zionism that crushes Palestinians in West Bank. Also, lots of Jewish women in media, academia, and Deep State have pushed policies that spread Wars for Israel all over Middle East and North Africa. Why didn't anyone sound the alarm about how feminism and the Women's March movement have too many Zionist and Lesbian women who's been supporting neo-imperialism, Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, and globalist wars? It's because Jews control the means of discourse, the platforms, and the money. To put on massive events, you need money and good media coverage. Jewish Power is okay with Women's March being full of Zionist women and lesbians who support the Deep State and Neo-Imperialism, BUT my oh my, something must be done about all those 'anti-Semites'.
    Consider the anti-BDS laws. It is the Jews who invaded Palestine, drove out native folks and who continue to occupy West Bank. Jews also violate international norms and have 300 nukes made from stolen uranium from the US. But the US sends billions in aid to Israel, and both Political Parties suck up to Jewish Power while Palestinian-Americans and their supporters are fired and blacklisted for standing up for justice for Palestinians. Now, it'd be one thing if one could choose to support or condemn Israel OR support or condemn Palestinians. A matter of personal conscience and liberty. But in the US, one has no choice but to favor Israel over Palestinians in all the institutions and industries that count. If you're homeless, you can use free speech. But if you're a person of any consequence, you will be utterly destroyed if you support BDS.

    Jewish anti-whiteness has several facets to it.

    1. There is fear based on actual history. There have been times when White Christians and Neo-Pagans did hurt Jews real bad. Jews have deep historical memory and know well that history can change fast. So, there is genuine Jewish fear of White Power.

    2. There is whiteness as convenient scapegoat. This is especially useful for Jews because they are the new ruling class. Generally, those on top get the most criticism and abuse from below. Jews don't mind criticism of the elites in Israel because both elites and people are Jewish. So, the criticism of elite power in Israel isn't about 'antisemitism' but abuse and corruption. But in the US, Jews fear that criticism of Jewish elites can turn into anti-Jewish animus or call out on what is essentially Jewish supremacism. Then, it's convenient for Jews to have so many people blame 'white privilege' for all the problems. Even as or especially because Jews constantly vilify Wasps, Jews need them to stick around if only as Evil Icons or Straw Men for bashing. Wasps are the useful decoy or degoy. So, in Hollywood movies, the Face of Evil is usually some Waspy type who heads a corporation or department. Or some Russian-type.

    3. Another reason why Jews are so anti-white is because they are so dependent on white. Even if whites don't become anti-Jewish, Jews hate the notion of white autonomy, or whites feeling pretty good to be white. "It's Okay to be White" pissed off so many Jews. If whites feel that way, they will gain pride and confidence. They would no longer need to atone by obeying a morally superior holy group for redemption. But the fact is Jewish Power is all head and no body. For example, how could the US military serve as the arm of Zionists IF white generals and soldiers feel that the US military exists mainly to serve and defend the US, not to serve in Middle East wars for Israel? So, Jews have to inject continuous doses of 'white guilt' to make whites lose pride and confidence. A guilty people feel they must serve others for atonement, and Jewish Power naturally says 'you must serve us'.
    The Diversity Stuff is really just a ruse. If most Jews are really into Equal Justice for All Peoples, why do they insist the US support Israel against Palestinians, Syria, and Iran? The problem for Jews is that they are essentially pushing a tribal agenda spun as universal agenda. To fool us, Jews use terminology like 'diversity' and 'inclusion' AND iconography of People of Color, but when we look at the nitty-gritty details of globalism, it's always JEWS FIRST and ISRAEL FIRST. Look at US vs Russia, US vs Iran, US vs Palestinians, US vs Syria, US vs Libya, and etc, and the Surest Common Denominator is they are all designed to serve Jewish interests. I mean, what do Mexican-Americans care about Syria? What do black-Americans care about Iran? What do hillbillies in W. Virginia care about expanding NATO to Ukraine? What do Filipino-Americans care about Libya? What do Italian-Americans care about BDS? It's all about Jews, but Jews know they can't sell it as such... so we are told that a nuclear-armed Iran is going to blow up the US, Russia is out to grab the world, China is planning to take over everything, and other such nonsense. Now, I'm thinking that many POC at elite levels know that Jews are full of it, but they go along with the charade because it's their only ticket into the corridors of power and privilege. And this is why Jews love to parade around Obama. He's been a good boy who did the bidding of Jews and their homo allies. He was made president and was showered with millions and millions of money and glorious media coverage. Uncle Charm.
    That said, there is something to admire about Jews. Just consider. Look at all those Muslims in the US military who take orders from the Zionist-controlled government to go destroy Muslim nations. If Muslim-Americans are ordered to drop bombs to kill Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East, they will do so. But imagine if Muslim-Americans have an average IQ of 130, take over much of media and elite institutions. Suppose they use their media and money power to vilify Israel as the greatest abuser of human rights, a 'New Nazi Nation'. Suppose the Muslim-American elites steer the US to use sanctions to kill 100,000s of Jewish kids and to employ shock-and-awe tactics to blow Israel to smithereens. How many Jewish-Americans would join in this massacre? Probably none. On that score, Jews are better than white cucks and Muslim morons.

    4. Another reason why Jews and POC are so anti-white is they are addicted to whiteness. Despite all the anti-white iconoclasm, the fact is whiteness still has tremendous iconic value. Black athletes want blonde white women. Look at Tiger Woods. He was celebrated for his mixed-race-ness but he never went for mixed-race women but for Aryan-looking women. Look at silly Asians with their hair-dyeing and plastic surgery, or their videogames with white-looking characters. Hayao Miyazaki's movies were all set in some white fantasy lands before TORORO, and even there, Asian characters are drawn with features that look more Caucasian. And in Latin America, brown folks are addicted to Soap Opera with mostly white characters. And men in Turkey and Middle East got the Natasha Syndrome.

    https://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/17/world/istanbul-journal-natasha-syndrome-brings-on-a-fever-in-turkey.html

    https://www.forbes.com/2008/11/24/russia-bond-girls-oped-cx_mk_1125kaylan.html#2515ef1b61aa

    Because all the world wants whiteness -- good governance, personable-ness, ability & competence, sexual attraction, balance of reason and emotion, etc -- , they hate the idea of whites owning whiteness. If whites own whiteness, then whites would get to decide what to do with their lands, passion, abilities, sex appeal, legacy, and etc. What's the difference between a woman of dignity and a whore? Woman of dignity has control over her body and decides who can be with her. In contrast, a whore is open to anyone with a few bucks. (Odd thing about Abortion Rights is it's sold as women's control over her own body but actually promotes behavior where she has less self-control because she can always negate the unwanted pregnancy with sucking out the fetus. She can act like a whore without suffering the consequence.) A woman of dignity owns herself and her own body. She gets to determine who can be with her. A whore, on the other hand, has to do what the pimp tells her to. Her body must put out to all comers willing to pay.
    Similarly, white dignity and autonomy would mean that whiteness has value in and of itself. It has meaning as heredity, legacy, heritage, and history. If whites are unique and have dignity, they can decide their own destiny and say NO to non-whites who want to partake of whiteness.
    Then, the ONLY way to make whiteness accessible to all the world is to commoditize it into a product, and the end-logic of this is the pornification of whiteness as meat. And it won't be long before globo-homo forces will call for legalization of prostitution.
    In a way, what was done to Slavic women in Israeli and Arab brothels was hardly different from what is being done to whiteness as a whole all around the world. Whites are being told that they don't own their whiteness. White lands are not white. White history is not white. Ancient Greece was not white. Medieval Europe was not white. White heroes are not white. (Let's cast blacks as Achilles, Julius Caesar, Lancelot, and Hamilton.) White bodies are not white and put out to other races as servings and offerings. So, if 100 million black African men move to Europe, each is deserving of a white womb to produce black babies. And the US as white-envisioned and white-made nation? No way, that's 'racist'. Just let tons of browns from south of the border barge in and grab SWPM or Stuff White People Made. Even though the psycho who killed the plastic surgeon for passing 'white features' to Asians was a nutter, he had a point. Another race was appropriating specific features of whiteness for itself. He was accused of 'white supremacism', but aren't Asians the Real White Supremacists by undergoing surgery to replace 'ugly' Asian features with 'beautiful' white ones? And all these immigration patterns have one thing in common: We want to be with white than with our own kind. Jewish immigration always preferred whiteness.

    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-11/news/mn-22701_1_white-supremacist

    So, this aspect of anti-whiteness is really a paradox. Jews and non-whites beat up on whitey to destroy the notion that proud whites own whiteness. That way, ashamed whites will market whiteness as just a commodity for all of humanity to buy or partake of.

    Josef Stalin himself was a Georgian working with many non-Russians to rule over the Russian Empire.

    It was an ethnic war against ethnic Russians.

  189. Anonymous[311] • Disclaimer says:
    @dfordoom

    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
     
    No, they won't. It's the rich who are in charge of all this. They're calling the shots. They're financing the Coalition of the Fringes. Wealth is most definitely not going to be seized.

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.

    Uh, nope. The whole point of identity politics is for one identity group to smash rival identity groups.

    • Replies: @obwandiyag
    You are one of the stupid. You have not right to respond to dfordoom's cogent and absolutely true observation, because your the opinions of the stupid are worth less than a coin toss.
    , @dfordoom


    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.
     
    Uh, nope. The whole point of identity politics is for one identity group to smash rival identity groups.
     
    Just try for a moment seeing things from the point of view of the elite. They're the people with all the power and money. What are they going to want more than anything else in the world? Obviously, to hold on to their power and money. Not just as individuals but as a class. Because everybody they know, their family members, the people they went to Yale with, the friends they made when they interned at Goldman Sachs, every single person they know - they're all fellow members of the elite.

    What they're going to be most worried about is that the people without the power and money will decide they'd like to have their share. The people without the power and money might decide to line the members of the elite up against a wall and shoot them.

    So how do you prevent that? Very simple. You make sure the have-nots are divided amongst themselves. You make sure that poor whites and poor blacks are at each other's throats, and that poor whites and poor hispanics are at each other's throats. You make sure that the big political issues of the day are which pronouns to use, and transexual bathroom rights. Because that means that uncomfortable issues (like economic inequality and unaffordable housing) are kept off the political agenda.

    So what do you do? You invent identity politics. And you fund it generously.
  190. @utu

    Upton Sinclair observed, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!” Not surprisingly, many in the Democratic-media complex misunderstood the video of the besieged boy acting classy as yet more evidence of the white wickedness for which they hope to be rewarded for uncovering.
     
    Do you really think they are stupid, that they do not know what they are doing, that nobody is telling them what to do?

    They are opportunists with a racial agenda.

  191. @Issac
    You observe well. There is no path forward for your people without a non-trivial elite cohort supporting you. If I were a white American, I would be planning my family's exit strategy.

    If I were a white American, I would be planning my family’s exit strategy.

    What do you mean?

  192. @JimD
    Have been reading your blog for a time, have found your take interesting, and have often wondered why you are lumped in with the alt-right extremists.

    Your Taki distinction of Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up - a very pernicious analysis.

    Your Taki distinction of Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up – a very pernicious analysis.

    What do you mean by pernicious?

    • Replies: @Anon


    Your Taki distinction of Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up – a very pernicious analysis.
     
    What do you mean by pernicious?
     
    Pernicious is African American Vernacular English for perspicacious.

    You can see why the SAT is considered biased against blacks by the black community. Vercabulinity like this is not recognized on the test and is downscored, causing tens of thousands of young black college applicants to rely on holistic admissions processes and waste time writing fake essays about Black Lives Matter.
  193. @Jake
    "Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa."

    Our country is run by WASP Elites and their allies, preponderantly Jews. They are not primitive, but they know how to use the primitive to serve them as tools and weapons against the vast majority of white Gentiles.

    Our country is run by WASP Elites and their allies, preponderantly Jews.

    Could you list 5 of these Anglo Saxon elites?

    And would you please desist from using the racial epithet “WASP”?

  194. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Isn’t being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?
     
    Young Alyssa Milano? Maybe. Aging Alyssa? Hmmm.

    https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/08/AlyssaMilanorussia1.jpg

    I noticed yesterday that the same downgrading of looks thing has happened to Debra Messing. Isn’t there an aphorism of some sort about being careful or else your face will permanently freeze in that nastiness that you project to the world.

    • Replies: @Anon
    There’s all sorts of sayings about how frowns and scowls turn into permanent wrinkles.
    , @Lurker
    Nature gives you the face you have at twenty. Life shapes the face you have at thirty. But at fifty you get the face you deserve.

    Is what I was thinking of.
  195. Off-topic but probably more relevant than anything else in the news today. Should any benighted HBDers still be under the impression that genetics is poised to advance the cause of race-essentialism with Real Science!™, you may wish to think again. For now we have the prospect of AeroMexico offering fare discounts for passengers based on their percentage of “Mexican” DNA.

    AeroMexico’s DNA Discounts: How to Fly High on your Mexican DNA.

    So far this particular ad campaign had not generated much of a response, but it is a harbinger of things to come. To the extent that genetics is ever accepted into the mainstream, it will simply become another token in the game of petty political maneuvering that characterizes the modern social landscape. Corporations, interest groups, victimology mongers, and snake oil salesmen of whatever description can play the DNA game just as easily as they currently play the social justice game, and they will be able to function quite well in this new regime simply by changing their vocabulary and their costume, all while their purpose remains the same. The widespread availability of cheap genetic testing will one day prove to have been a great gift to the racial grievance industry and its menagerie of reparation-clamorers and narrative-based welfare moochers. A future wherein an already bloated and all-powerful HR bureaucracy maintains its own internal DNA department is not out of the realm of possibility.

    Of course, none of this is actual science. Genetics as it is presently understood is a sort of materialist-mysticism not unlike the spiritualism of the Edwardian Age, and will one day come to be seen every bit as riddled with philosophical dilettantism and pedestrian perversity as the latter. As a homologous structure, cultural expression, and body-constituent of the times, HBD is also entirely “Current Year” ; the mirror of SJWism—i.e. abstruse in its academic expression and corrosive in its practical results—and a fitting exemplar of the fin de siècle inanities that portend the passing of an era.

    • Agree: utu, dfordoom
    • Replies: @vinteuil

    Genetics as it is presently understood is a sort of materialist-mysticism not unlike the spiritualism of the Edwardian Age
     
    Well, utu agrees with you - so there's that.
  196. @Cloudbuster
    The Twitter account which started this mess was from South America and has been banned.

    Irrelevant. The impressive roster of media figures who went all in on reviling the Covington boys were not from South America.

    Irrelevant. The impressive roster of media figures who went all in on reviling the Covington boys were not from South America.

    This. Who is the Paleo Liberal person squirting squid ink for?

  197. @Anon
    Identity Stalinism or Identity Hitlerism?

    Stalinism was about class war. Who/Whom was determined mainly by class(though 'class' could be defined rather flexibly). After all, peoples of all ethnic backgrounds participated in the Soviet project. Josef Stalin himself was a Georgian working with many non-Russians to rule over the Russian Empire.

    On the other hand, I suppose the current PC is Stalinist in the Orwellian sense because of political fluidity amidst ideological rigidity. In some ways, Stalinism was hard-leftist and Marxist-Leninist, but in the end, whatever Stalin said was the ultimate truth(until Stalin said something else). So, Nazi Germany was enemy forever prior to 1939, friend from 30 to 41, and enemy again from 41 to 45. Such discrepancy was less problematic with fascism that favored ideological 'creativity' and pluralism, aka the Third Position. In contrast, Stalinism claimed to be the highest achievement of Marxist-Leninist ideology but so often deviated from its ideals according to Stalin's whims. And, there is something similar in the politics of the current West. For one thing, the Truth is less about a set of values or principles that the whims of Jewish Personality. So, 'Nationalism good for Israel, bad for Hungary. Nukes good for Israel, bad for Iran. Cheney bad for failed war in Iraq, but Trump also bad for wanting to pull out from Middle East.'
    In some ways, PC is about rigidity of passion. PC folks easily get triggered by the slightest deviance, and yet, rules change so fast that even many PC folks aren't sure of the latest trends and what they're supposed to bark at and when. One difference between Stalinism and Globo-Homo is there was genuine ideological underpinning to communism whereas Globo-Homo is less about ideology than iconography. A kind of ICON Curtain has descended on the West, and that is why the image of the white kid with 'smirk'(looked more like a bemused smile to me) was so triggering. According to PC, white male, esp with MAGA hat, is the Iconic Image of Evil. And that was enough for the Iconoclasmic rage. Iconoclasm is the Rage-Orgasm of the globo-homo progs. Iconography for the good, iconoclasm for the bad. Even the use of terminology is iconocentric in current PC. Marxists spoke of the proletariat and bourgeoisie, terms emphasizing economic stations of peoples. But a term like 'white privilege' conjures White Face as evil. And a term like 'people of color' creates a mental image of people of various races and colors. And it's telling that women are now so much into vagina and even wear 'pussy hats' or clothing shaped like actual poons. Icunts. And when we think of homos, we don't really think of ideas or values. We just think of homo-as-saint characters on TV shows, 'rainbow' flags, and 'gay pride' parades. And homoshering of food is more fun than koshering. We aren't sure which foods are 'kosher' or why, but look at those 'rainbow' pack of Oreo cookies. Right, I just love to bite into food thinking of homos buggering each other or a guy having his penis cut by Frankenstein Medicine.

    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DLW9BFkqxh0/hqdefault.jpg

    The problem for Jews is they don't have much iconic status. They once did as comedians in a more inhibited and cerebral age. Back then, Jews as subversive agents had lots of iconic value as agents for greater liberty. Lenny Bruce wasn't a looker but his foul talk seemed daring. But we now live in a shameless age of cultural filth, and so, no Jewish guy can score points just by being subversive or going on and on about his pud like Philip Roth or Ron Jeremy. And as our culture is anti-intellectual, Jews won't gain much ground by being like Norman Mailer -- novelist and public intellectual -- and Susan Sontag, an essayist who wrote on difficult matters, the Jewish Mind gets less respect. There was a time when the culture made a big deal of Woody Allen trying to make serious movies, the American Bergman. While the culture has grown more uninhibited in terms of sex and violence, it has grown more stunted intellectually due to power of PC and idolatry(over ideology or as the new ideology). Things got so crazy that it takes real courage for someone like Jordan Peterson to say, "Wait a minute.. that man is a man, not a woman." The culture is retarded and anti-intellectual... or it is pseudo-intellectual or schizo-intellectual. It's not sane about anything. Jewish comedians used to score points by using wit to subvert sacred cows. It was easier to do in the past when Sacred Cows were associated with Power, thus 'punching up' to Wasps and White Christians. But now, the Sacred Cows are associated with Powerlessness even though Jews, homos, and blacks have lots of power. Comedians can still beat up on whites, but at this point, it's like beating a dead horse or feeding a fed horse. Norman Mailer warned of the 'fascism of the left' as more dangerous because, traditionally, the left defined itself as the power of freedom against tyranny and repression. But when the struggle itself turns dogmatic and hardline, there is no place to go for freedom. People went to the left for freedom it couldn't find on the right, but if the left is for dogma, then freedom is dead all around. Granted, the dangers of the Left were evident from the beginning with the French Revolution. And Orwell wrote the perfect book on Stalinism or radical leftism as tyranny beyond tyranny. Still, many people in the West chose to believe the failure of Eastern Communism had less to do with ideology than Oriental Despotism of Slavicism.

    Because Jews have less iconic power now, they must maintain grip-and-whip on their proxies with the more iconic or 'idolic' power. They are blacks due to sports and music. And homos for their flaming narcissism. Most POC groups have no iconic power but, as the saying goes, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Diversity has been promoted as an iconic image of New America where All the World is drinking coke and singing(or maybe 'twerking') in perfect harmony. Because Jews control finance, academia, media, deep state, courts, law firms, and most whore politicians, they have lots of tricks to control the dogs. Jews are masters, and their proxies are like dogs. But, dogs are not always easy to train. Sure, you can make them track a scent, but dogs sometimes have a mind of their own.. or they might become distracted by something other than the scent. Or, what if the dogs mistake YOU for the scent. This is problematic for Jews because the 'scent' of whiteness is sometimes detected on Jews by non-whites. "No, bad doggy, my smell is holocausty-whitey, good. Go after nazi-whitey, bad." Also, it takes some time and effort to train dogs. Some of these immigrant groups come from nations where people have been trained to dislike Jews. Now, it's a tall order for Jews to re-train Muslims and such folks to love Jews. But maybe they can be trained to bark and bite so furiously at Bad-whitey that they won't bother with Jewish-whitey. This is why yellow dogs are especially useful. Yellows come with either neutral or pro-Jewish attitudes(because they love to suck up to power), and so, Jews can train them to be like Sarah Jeong. As for folks from Latin America, Jews know they can easily make them bark at Gringo. White Latinos have this envy for Anglo-Americans, and so, Latin whites and Jewish whites make common cause to take more from northern whites. As for the browns, they feel resentment against blanco. It doesn't matter whether it's Latin whites or gringo whites. Even as they want to live under richer gringos, they are filled with inferiority complex, and Jews play on that. But Muslims and blacks are problematic dogs to train. Muslims have a very proud religion that isn't about turn-the-other-cheek. Also, POC ideology actually favors them against Jews in a way. Many folks around the world see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as WHITE Jewish colonialists vs brown oppressed. As for blacks, they are dawgs than dogs, or dogs-with-attitude. Unlike yellow dogs and brown dogs, blacks are not easy to train. They like to let the good rabbits run and chase after them. Also, as dawgs are semi-wolf-like in aggression, they get pissed if the master demands too much. Or black dawgs go too far with the aggression. When the Jewish master tells black dawgs to bark at whitey, he doesn't necessarily mean that they should run wild and burn down entire cities, messing things up for gentrification as well. But black dawgs often get out of control, as with BLM fiasco. (So, Jews have been trying to spin it as controlled by Russia.)

    Jewish Power is crucial in the equation because the elites get to call the shots through control of the Megaphone and Methadone. Jews can rouse people to hatred or soothe them with happy feely stuff. Take the Women's March. Why was it shut down for being 'antisemitic' but not 'anti-Palestinian'? After all, many Jewish women in feminism support Zionism that crushes Palestinians in West Bank. Also, lots of Jewish women in media, academia, and Deep State have pushed policies that spread Wars for Israel all over Middle East and North Africa. Why didn't anyone sound the alarm about how feminism and the Women's March movement have too many Zionist and Lesbian women who's been supporting neo-imperialism, Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, and globalist wars? It's because Jews control the means of discourse, the platforms, and the money. To put on massive events, you need money and good media coverage. Jewish Power is okay with Women's March being full of Zionist women and lesbians who support the Deep State and Neo-Imperialism, BUT my oh my, something must be done about all those 'anti-Semites'.
    Consider the anti-BDS laws. It is the Jews who invaded Palestine, drove out native folks and who continue to occupy West Bank. Jews also violate international norms and have 300 nukes made from stolen uranium from the US. But the US sends billions in aid to Israel, and both Political Parties suck up to Jewish Power while Palestinian-Americans and their supporters are fired and blacklisted for standing up for justice for Palestinians. Now, it'd be one thing if one could choose to support or condemn Israel OR support or condemn Palestinians. A matter of personal conscience and liberty. But in the US, one has no choice but to favor Israel over Palestinians in all the institutions and industries that count. If you're homeless, you can use free speech. But if you're a person of any consequence, you will be utterly destroyed if you support BDS.

    Jewish anti-whiteness has several facets to it.

    1. There is fear based on actual history. There have been times when White Christians and Neo-Pagans did hurt Jews real bad. Jews have deep historical memory and know well that history can change fast. So, there is genuine Jewish fear of White Power.

    2. There is whiteness as convenient scapegoat. This is especially useful for Jews because they are the new ruling class. Generally, those on top get the most criticism and abuse from below. Jews don't mind criticism of the elites in Israel because both elites and people are Jewish. So, the criticism of elite power in Israel isn't about 'antisemitism' but abuse and corruption. But in the US, Jews fear that criticism of Jewish elites can turn into anti-Jewish animus or call out on what is essentially Jewish supremacism. Then, it's convenient for Jews to have so many people blame 'white privilege' for all the problems. Even as or especially because Jews constantly vilify Wasps, Jews need them to stick around if only as Evil Icons or Straw Men for bashing. Wasps are the useful decoy or degoy. So, in Hollywood movies, the Face of Evil is usually some Waspy type who heads a corporation or department. Or some Russian-type.

    3. Another reason why Jews are so anti-white is because they are so dependent on white. Even if whites don't become anti-Jewish, Jews hate the notion of white autonomy, or whites feeling pretty good to be white. "It's Okay to be White" pissed off so many Jews. If whites feel that way, they will gain pride and confidence. They would no longer need to atone by obeying a morally superior holy group for redemption. But the fact is Jewish Power is all head and no body. For example, how could the US military serve as the arm of Zionists IF white generals and soldiers feel that the US military exists mainly to serve and defend the US, not to serve in Middle East wars for Israel? So, Jews have to inject continuous doses of 'white guilt' to make whites lose pride and confidence. A guilty people feel they must serve others for atonement, and Jewish Power naturally says 'you must serve us'.
    The Diversity Stuff is really just a ruse. If most Jews are really into Equal Justice for All Peoples, why do they insist the US support Israel against Palestinians, Syria, and Iran? The problem for Jews is that they are essentially pushing a tribal agenda spun as universal agenda. To fool us, Jews use terminology like 'diversity' and 'inclusion' AND iconography of People of Color, but when we look at the nitty-gritty details of globalism, it's always JEWS FIRST and ISRAEL FIRST. Look at US vs Russia, US vs Iran, US vs Palestinians, US vs Syria, US vs Libya, and etc, and the Surest Common Denominator is they are all designed to serve Jewish interests. I mean, what do Mexican-Americans care about Syria? What do black-Americans care about Iran? What do hillbillies in W. Virginia care about expanding NATO to Ukraine? What do Filipino-Americans care about Libya? What do Italian-Americans care about BDS? It's all about Jews, but Jews know they can't sell it as such... so we are told that a nuclear-armed Iran is going to blow up the US, Russia is out to grab the world, China is planning to take over everything, and other such nonsense. Now, I'm thinking that many POC at elite levels know that Jews are full of it, but they go along with the charade because it's their only ticket into the corridors of power and privilege. And this is why Jews love to parade around Obama. He's been a good boy who did the bidding of Jews and their homo allies. He was made president and was showered with millions and millions of money and glorious media coverage. Uncle Charm.
    That said, there is something to admire about Jews. Just consider. Look at all those Muslims in the US military who take orders from the Zionist-controlled government to go destroy Muslim nations. If Muslim-Americans are ordered to drop bombs to kill Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East, they will do so. But imagine if Muslim-Americans have an average IQ of 130, take over much of media and elite institutions. Suppose they use their media and money power to vilify Israel as the greatest abuser of human rights, a 'New Nazi Nation'. Suppose the Muslim-American elites steer the US to use sanctions to kill 100,000s of Jewish kids and to employ shock-and-awe tactics to blow Israel to smithereens. How many Jewish-Americans would join in this massacre? Probably none. On that score, Jews are better than white cucks and Muslim morons.

    4. Another reason why Jews and POC are so anti-white is they are addicted to whiteness. Despite all the anti-white iconoclasm, the fact is whiteness still has tremendous iconic value. Black athletes want blonde white women. Look at Tiger Woods. He was celebrated for his mixed-race-ness but he never went for mixed-race women but for Aryan-looking women. Look at silly Asians with their hair-dyeing and plastic surgery, or their videogames with white-looking characters. Hayao Miyazaki's movies were all set in some white fantasy lands before TORORO, and even there, Asian characters are drawn with features that look more Caucasian. And in Latin America, brown folks are addicted to Soap Opera with mostly white characters. And men in Turkey and Middle East got the Natasha Syndrome.

    https://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/17/world/istanbul-journal-natasha-syndrome-brings-on-a-fever-in-turkey.html

    https://www.forbes.com/2008/11/24/russia-bond-girls-oped-cx_mk_1125kaylan.html#2515ef1b61aa

    Because all the world wants whiteness -- good governance, personable-ness, ability & competence, sexual attraction, balance of reason and emotion, etc -- , they hate the idea of whites owning whiteness. If whites own whiteness, then whites would get to decide what to do with their lands, passion, abilities, sex appeal, legacy, and etc. What's the difference between a woman of dignity and a whore? Woman of dignity has control over her body and decides who can be with her. In contrast, a whore is open to anyone with a few bucks. (Odd thing about Abortion Rights is it's sold as women's control over her own body but actually promotes behavior where she has less self-control because she can always negate the unwanted pregnancy with sucking out the fetus. She can act like a whore without suffering the consequence.) A woman of dignity owns herself and her own body. She gets to determine who can be with her. A whore, on the other hand, has to do what the pimp tells her to. Her body must put out to all comers willing to pay.
    Similarly, white dignity and autonomy would mean that whiteness has value in and of itself. It has meaning as heredity, legacy, heritage, and history. If whites are unique and have dignity, they can decide their own destiny and say NO to non-whites who want to partake of whiteness.
    Then, the ONLY way to make whiteness accessible to all the world is to commoditize it into a product, and the end-logic of this is the pornification of whiteness as meat. And it won't be long before globo-homo forces will call for legalization of prostitution.
    In a way, what was done to Slavic women in Israeli and Arab brothels was hardly different from what is being done to whiteness as a whole all around the world. Whites are being told that they don't own their whiteness. White lands are not white. White history is not white. Ancient Greece was not white. Medieval Europe was not white. White heroes are not white. (Let's cast blacks as Achilles, Julius Caesar, Lancelot, and Hamilton.) White bodies are not white and put out to other races as servings and offerings. So, if 100 million black African men move to Europe, each is deserving of a white womb to produce black babies. And the US as white-envisioned and white-made nation? No way, that's 'racist'. Just let tons of browns from south of the border barge in and grab SWPM or Stuff White People Made. Even though the psycho who killed the plastic surgeon for passing 'white features' to Asians was a nutter, he had a point. Another race was appropriating specific features of whiteness for itself. He was accused of 'white supremacism', but aren't Asians the Real White Supremacists by undergoing surgery to replace 'ugly' Asian features with 'beautiful' white ones? And all these immigration patterns have one thing in common: We want to be with white than with our own kind. Jewish immigration always preferred whiteness.

    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-11/news/mn-22701_1_white-supremacist

    So, this aspect of anti-whiteness is really a paradox. Jews and non-whites beat up on whitey to destroy the notion that proud whites own whiteness. That way, ashamed whites will market whiteness as just a commodity for all of humanity to buy or partake of.

    Hire an editor.

  198. @TelfoedJohn
    Can someone fill me in about when and why entertainers started pontificating about politics? Is it Bob Dylan’s fault? Seems to be a very Western thing. I can’t imagine Jackie Chan talking about the latest five year plan and being taken seriously.

    Actor John Wilkes Booth had strong political views.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    LOL!
  199. Anon[398] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Your Taki distinction of Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up – a very pernicious analysis.
     
    What do you mean by pernicious?

    Your Taki distinction of Core vs. Fringe Americans clears that up – a very pernicious analysis.

    What do you mean by pernicious?

    Pernicious is African American Vernacular English for perspicacious.

    You can see why the SAT is considered biased against blacks by the black community. Vercabulinity like this is not recognized on the test and is downscored, causing tens of thousands of young black college applicants to rely on holistic admissions processes and waste time writing fake essays about Black Lives Matter.

  200. @AnonAnon

    The initial video was from instagram, but a now suspended Russian twitter
     
    Those pesky Russians. Sure the true source wasn’t deep state types making it look like “the Russians”?

    Sure the true source wasn’t deep state types making it look like “the Russians”?

    Yes, because it’s extremely embarrassing to the left.

  201. @Jake
    Except that by then the average New Englander of pure WASP stock was fully a heretic of the worst sort and already given to backing almost all crazy Liberal notions in cultural and political matters as long as they were not seen as being imposed by non-New Englanders of pure WASP stock.

    Except that by then the average New Englander of pure WASP stock was fully a heretic of the worst sort and already given to backing almost all crazy Liberal notions in cultural and political matters

    Dunno……New England in the 18th century was pretty conservative….Cf John Adams vs Thomas Jefferson….And the conservative strain in New England thought contains a lot of distinguished names: Nathaniel Hawthorne, James Russell Lowell, Henry Adams, Ralph Adams Cram, Lovecraft, TS Eliot (born in Missouri, but of New England stock), Lothrop Stoddard, …..

    • Replies: @Anon
    Whatever they were st one time, the Nee England WASPS are now deranged liberals, especially the Unitarians Congregationalists and the numerous atheists
  202. @Jake
    "Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa."

    Our country is run by WASP Elites and their allies, preponderantly Jews. They are not primitive, but they know how to use the primitive to serve them as tools and weapons against the vast majority of white Gentiles.

    “Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa.”

    Our country is run by WASP Elites and their allies, preponderantly Jews.

    When was the last time the WASP elite was in charge? The early ’60s? Jews have been the senior partner for quite some time now…..

    • Agree: Hail
  203. @Keypusher
    The thing is “free reign” really does express the meaning of the phrase better than the correct “free rein” does. That’s why that mistake gets made so often.

    Honestly, if I’ve ever considered the distinction I’ve forgotten about it. But it’s obvious once you see it.

  204. @dfordoom

    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
     
    No, they won't. It's the rich who are in charge of all this. They're calling the shots. They're financing the Coalition of the Fringes. Wealth is most definitely not going to be seized.

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized.

    I agree though some minor rearrangements are possible to make some subgroups of foot soldiers more happy.

  205. @syonredux

    Except that by then the average New Englander of pure WASP stock was fully a heretic of the worst sort and already given to backing almost all crazy Liberal notions in cultural and political matters
     
    Dunno......New England in the 18th century was pretty conservative....Cf John Adams vs Thomas Jefferson....And the conservative strain in New England thought contains a lot of distinguished names: Nathaniel Hawthorne, James Russell Lowell, Henry Adams, Ralph Adams Cram, Lovecraft, TS Eliot (born in Missouri, but of New England stock), Lothrop Stoddard, .....

    Whatever they were st one time, the Nee England WASPS are now deranged liberals, especially the Unitarians Congregationalists and the numerous atheists

    • Replies: @syonredux

    Whatever they were st one time, the Nee England WASPS are now deranged liberals, especially the Unitarians Congregationalists and the numerous atheists
     
    When I was living in Massachusetts, I met quite a few ultra- conservatives......interesting fellows, much sharper, on average, than the hard-right types that I've met from other states....
  206. @Johnny789
    I noticed yesterday that the same downgrading of looks thing has happened to Debra Messing. Isn't there an aphorism of some sort about being careful or else your face will permanently freeze in that nastiness that you project to the world.

    There’s all sorts of sayings about how frowns and scowls turn into permanent wrinkles.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
    A smile is the cheapest facelift.
  207. As Joseph Stalin was brought up we should consider this piece of wisdom of his:

    Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas. – Joseph Stalin

    and ponder which ideas American Stalins took away from us and what ersatz ideas they gave us instead. Is it possible that the White boy vs. the Indian is one of this ersatz ideas that will get us nowhere?

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Is it possible that the White boy vs. the Indian is one of this ersatz ideas that will get us nowhere?
     
    What is the "the White boy vs. Indian" idea?
  208. I’m glad that the young men had to endure this event. No substitute for real world experience. They may now know how the table is set.

  209. Some actual Americans are so full of self-loathing they anxiously await the destruction of everything as a way out of their misery. Naturally they ally with the third world freak show. Other Americans really don’t really understand what they are bringing upon themselves by allying with the third world freak show. But you want to image the future, imagine shrill hijabed Muslim women lecturing us about all the wonderful human rights found in the Koran – forever. Actually that’s not the future, it was last week at the woman’s march.

  210. You are the one whipping people into a frenzy. The overwhelming majority of people in the country do not know about this and do not care if they know. They have mortgages to pay. I notice you don’t talk about people’s mortgages too much. You’d rather beat the race-war drum. And don’t tell me you aren’t beating a drum by wanging and wanging and wanging on about this staged photo opportunity. You are beating louder and longer than the fake Indian. Why don’t you just get off it and talk about mortgages, and how the government ought to bail out people who are having trouble with theirs. Oh, no. I get it. You want people to suffer and die for lack of money. As long as liberals stop running around making fools out of themselves calling people racist, you don’t care who dies of starvation.

  211. @The Anti-Gnostic
    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    Sovereignty is always consensus by the majority. When the majority of the Soviets no longer believed in the Soviet Union, it disappeared. NATO gave Gaddafi a push, and his regime--and his whole artificial country--toppled over. When the Baltics asked the Russians to leave, they did. Russians don't really have it in them to go full-Pizarro any more.

    ISIS very nearly had their own country, but violent, consumptive religions don't do well turning young people into spouses and parents, which is really all it's all about. ISIS just doesn't have the numbers, so they don't get sovereignty.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 - 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative "Gandhiism" will be crushed.

    Think of Bose for a moment.

    At the point Louis Battenberg was sent to India to execute one of the fastest and most successful military retreats in human history, Bose may have been dead, but his legacy, a colonial military on the brink of rebellion lived on.

    That everybody heard of Ghandi and nobody of Bose is no mean feat of British propaganda. The pirate’s empire would have collapsed even swifter had it become common knowledge that they had to cede to a very serious threat of massacre – that way, they could exploit other countries for another one or two decades.

  212. Calling calling people racist “Stalinist” is just stupid and ignorant. Just plain stupid and ignorant. Unless it is a deliberate lie, meant to make sure that nobody starts asking where the money went, instead of wanging on about identity politics as you mean them to.

    • Replies: @TWS
    For goodness sake, we already have our limit of larpers, lunatics and monomaniacs. If you're not going to try being entertaining, try being pithy, if that's beyond you comment elsewhere.
  213. @dfordoom

    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
     
    No, they won't. It's the rich who are in charge of all this. They're calling the shots. They're financing the Coalition of the Fringes. Wealth is most definitely not going to be seized.

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.

    Exactly. Precisely. You have put your finger exactly on it.

    But don’t hold your breath until the readers on this dumb blog catch on to the truth of your simple truth. They are, get this, CONGENITALLY incapable of understanding such a simple but true concept, because they are ruled by their snake-brain prejudices like worms.

    • Replies: @dfordoom

    But don’t hold your breath until the readers on this dumb blog catch on to the truth of your simple truth. They are, get this, CONGENITALLY incapable of understanding such a simple but true concept, because they are ruled by their snake-brain prejudices like worms.
     
    Unfortunately there's a lot of truth in that.

    Oddly enough it's not always racial prejudice. Often it's class prejudice. Or political prejudice. A lot of it is kneejerk political prejudice. Capitalism good. Socialism bad! Freedom good. Communism bad! Police good. The military good. Anyone who sees class as being significant is obviously a communist so they're bad. Anyone who thinks the police are anything other than Noble Heroes In Blue is obviously a communist.

    Then there's the absurd HBD stuff. It's amusing that dissident rightists adopt the same attitude towards science that the cultural left adopts. If it conflicts with their prejudices it's fake science, there's not enough data, the evidence is conflicting, correlation is not causation, it's all a matter of interpretation. If it agrees with their prejudices it's Science! and Science! is never wrong.
  214. @Issac
    You observe well. There is no path forward for your people without a non-trivial elite cohort supporting you. If I were a white American, I would be planning my family's exit strategy.

    If I were a white American, I would be planning my family’s exit strategy.

    Why? Where else would you go that is not undergoing a similar rot? Besides, there are well over 100 million whites in the USA who disagree with the way things are going, and we are the most heavily armed civilian population in the history of the world. It would seem silly to just abandon the place. In fact Whites in America have a better chance at surviving than most other Whites simply because of our numbers and the 2nd Amendment that other Whites lack.

    What we are seeing now is essentially a one-sided cold war in which the other side has gotten a free ride due to the overwhelming majority of American Whites who believe in the founding principles. Therefore, we have played by rules that the Left long ago abandoned. We are slowly figuring this out.

    We also are slowly figuring out that the Left derives most of its power through us. It is our reaction that gives them power. They have crafted words and concepts like ‘racism’ and ‘white privilege’ to use against us, and we willingly submit to those charges. We have yet to collectively tell them to fu*k off, or even to use our enormous economic clout to bring down companies who push the Leftist line. So long as we play by their rules, we lose. So long as we feed globo-homo with our dollars, we lose. It’s that simple.

    It’s like how everyone was afraid of the Wizard of Oz until they pulled back the curtain and saw behind it. Right now most Whites are afraid. But that is changing. Once a critical mass is reached, it will change real fast.

  215. @An Immigrant
    All I can say is that
    "It is just the beginning".
    America's future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    "White man White woman couples" are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    God is your post stupid. The mind, she boggles.

  216. @Anonymous

    The whole point of identity politics is to make sure that wealth does not get seized. The whole point of it is to distract everyone with irrelevant nonsense like the Pronoun Wars and Black Lives Matter so that the rich can enjoy their wealth in peace and security.
     
    Uh, nope. The whole point of identity politics is for one identity group to smash rival identity groups.

    You are one of the stupid. You have not right to respond to dfordoom’s cogent and absolutely true observation, because your the opinions of the stupid are worth less than a coin toss.

  217. @AnotherDad

    Gandhi faced the British, a fundamentally moral people. Do you think that is what we face with the Left?
     
    Yes, and with a reasonably fair press. And still they didn't get the Brits out of their country until the Brits
    -- had just fought a war where the casus belli--and moral justification--was the Germans being in other people's countries
    -- and were bankrupt.

    It was not, and please do educate yourself, do not take my word for it, Gandhi, who made the bloodsucking pirateas hastily leave the subcontinent they had plundered for two centuries, but the fact that their colonial military, nearly completely indigenous up to and including company level officers, was on the brink of rebellion.

    It did not help matters that the Japanese had crushed the myth of British invincibility quite thoroughly.

    How it came to pass that the Japanese, up to then doing the pirates’ bidding in Asia turned upon their erstwhile British friends and military suppliers is yet another ignored but highly interesting story. The British have numerous reasons to rethink their view of Churchill and his contemporaries, this being one of them.

    • Replies: @Anon
    Thanks, I never heard the Indian army was on the brink of mutiny.
    , @dfordoom

    It did not help matters that the Japanese had crushed the myth of British invincibility quite thoroughly.
     
    That's what ended the British Empire.

    How it came to pass that the Japanese, up to then doing the pirates’ bidding in Asia turned upon their erstwhile British friends and military suppliers is yet another ignored but highly interesting story. The British have numerous reasons to rethink their view of Churchill and his contemporaries, this being one of them.
     
    The Japanese did not turn on the British. The British turned on the Japanese by abandoning the Anglo-Japanese Alliance. They did that at the insistence of the Americans. One of the main objectives of American foreign policy from the First World War right up to the late 1950s was the destruction of the British Empire. It was one of their key war aims in WW2. To the U.S. Britain was a rival that needed to be destroyed.
  218. @utu
    As Joseph Stalin was brought up we should consider this piece of wisdom of his:

    Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas. – Joseph Stalin
     
    and ponder which ideas American Stalins took away from us and what ersatz ideas they gave us instead. Is it possible that the White boy vs. the Indian is one of this ersatz ideas that will get us nowhere?

    Is it possible that the White boy vs. the Indian is one of this ersatz ideas that will get us nowhere?

    What is the “the White boy vs. Indian” idea?

    • Replies: @utu
    I think the answer is in #95 comment.
  219. I’ve been referring the regime under which we live as Neo-Stalinism for a number of years. It gratifies me that as perceptive an observer as Steve Sailer agrees with my characterization.

  220. @Anonymous
    The interesting thing to me is libs piling on who don't need, by any prevailing standard, to hold an opinion on such a small hatcrime du jour. Is this status sensitivity, or really just Type A competition to be "content providers?" I understand the clickbait interns' incentive, but why does Alyssa Milano feel the need to play pundit over faddish news filler? Isn't being Alyssa Milano satisfactory?

    Alyssa who?

  221. @Anon
    Identity Stalinism or Identity Hitlerism?

    Stalinism was about class war. Who/Whom was determined mainly by class(though 'class' could be defined rather flexibly). After all, peoples of all ethnic backgrounds participated in the Soviet project. Josef Stalin himself was a Georgian working with many non-Russians to rule over the Russian Empire.

    On the other hand, I suppose the current PC is Stalinist in the Orwellian sense because of political fluidity amidst ideological rigidity. In some ways, Stalinism was hard-leftist and Marxist-Leninist, but in the end, whatever Stalin said was the ultimate truth(until Stalin said something else). So, Nazi Germany was enemy forever prior to 1939, friend from 30 to 41, and enemy again from 41 to 45. Such discrepancy was less problematic with fascism that favored ideological 'creativity' and pluralism, aka the Third Position. In contrast, Stalinism claimed to be the highest achievement of Marxist-Leninist ideology but so often deviated from its ideals according to Stalin's whims. And, there is something similar in the politics of the current West. For one thing, the Truth is less about a set of values or principles that the whims of Jewish Personality. So, 'Nationalism good for Israel, bad for Hungary. Nukes good for Israel, bad for Iran. Cheney bad for failed war in Iraq, but Trump also bad for wanting to pull out from Middle East.'
    In some ways, PC is about rigidity of passion. PC folks easily get triggered by the slightest deviance, and yet, rules change so fast that even many PC folks aren't sure of the latest trends and what they're supposed to bark at and when. One difference between Stalinism and Globo-Homo is there was genuine ideological underpinning to communism whereas Globo-Homo is less about ideology than iconography. A kind of ICON Curtain has descended on the West, and that is why the image of the white kid with 'smirk'(looked more like a bemused smile to me) was so triggering. According to PC, white male, esp with MAGA hat, is the Iconic Image of Evil. And that was enough for the Iconoclasmic rage. Iconoclasm is the Rage-Orgasm of the globo-homo progs. Iconography for the good, iconoclasm for the bad. Even the use of terminology is iconocentric in current PC. Marxists spoke of the proletariat and bourgeoisie, terms emphasizing economic stations of peoples. But a term like 'white privilege' conjures White Face as evil. And a term like 'people of color' creates a mental image of people of various races and colors. And it's telling that women are now so much into vagina and even wear 'pussy hats' or clothing shaped like actual poons. Icunts. And when we think of homos, we don't really think of ideas or values. We just think of homo-as-saint characters on TV shows, 'rainbow' flags, and 'gay pride' parades. And homoshering of food is more fun than koshering. We aren't sure which foods are 'kosher' or why, but look at those 'rainbow' pack of Oreo cookies. Right, I just love to bite into food thinking of homos buggering each other or a guy having his penis cut by Frankenstein Medicine.

    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DLW9BFkqxh0/hqdefault.jpg

    The problem for Jews is they don't have much iconic status. They once did as comedians in a more inhibited and cerebral age. Back then, Jews as subversive agents had lots of iconic value as agents for greater liberty. Lenny Bruce wasn't a looker but his foul talk seemed daring. But we now live in a shameless age of cultural filth, and so, no Jewish guy can score points just by being subversive or going on and on about his pud like Philip Roth or Ron Jeremy. And as our culture is anti-intellectual, Jews won't gain much ground by being like Norman Mailer -- novelist and public intellectual -- and Susan Sontag, an essayist who wrote on difficult matters, the Jewish Mind gets less respect. There was a time when the culture made a big deal of Woody Allen trying to make serious movies, the American Bergman. While the culture has grown more uninhibited in terms of sex and violence, it has grown more stunted intellectually due to power of PC and idolatry(over ideology or as the new ideology). Things got so crazy that it takes real courage for someone like Jordan Peterson to say, "Wait a minute.. that man is a man, not a woman." The culture is retarded and anti-intellectual... or it is pseudo-intellectual or schizo-intellectual. It's not sane about anything. Jewish comedians used to score points by using wit to subvert sacred cows. It was easier to do in the past when Sacred Cows were associated with Power, thus 'punching up' to Wasps and White Christians. But now, the Sacred Cows are associated with Powerlessness even though Jews, homos, and blacks have lots of power. Comedians can still beat up on whites, but at this point, it's like beating a dead horse or feeding a fed horse. Norman Mailer warned of the 'fascism of the left' as more dangerous because, traditionally, the left defined itself as the power of freedom against tyranny and repression. But when the struggle itself turns dogmatic and hardline, there is no place to go for freedom. People went to the left for freedom it couldn't find on the right, but if the left is for dogma, then freedom is dead all around. Granted, the dangers of the Left were evident from the beginning with the French Revolution. And Orwell wrote the perfect book on Stalinism or radical leftism as tyranny beyond tyranny. Still, many people in the West chose to believe the failure of Eastern Communism had less to do with ideology than Oriental Despotism of Slavicism.

    Because Jews have less iconic power now, they must maintain grip-and-whip on their proxies with the more iconic or 'idolic' power. They are blacks due to sports and music. And homos for their flaming narcissism. Most POC groups have no iconic power but, as the saying goes, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Diversity has been promoted as an iconic image of New America where All the World is drinking coke and singing(or maybe 'twerking') in perfect harmony. Because Jews control finance, academia, media, deep state, courts, law firms, and most whore politicians, they have lots of tricks to control the dogs. Jews are masters, and their proxies are like dogs. But, dogs are not always easy to train. Sure, you can make them track a scent, but dogs sometimes have a mind of their own.. or they might become distracted by something other than the scent. Or, what if the dogs mistake YOU for the scent. This is problematic for Jews because the 'scent' of whiteness is sometimes detected on Jews by non-whites. "No, bad doggy, my smell is holocausty-whitey, good. Go after nazi-whitey, bad." Also, it takes some time and effort to train dogs. Some of these immigrant groups come from nations where people have been trained to dislike Jews. Now, it's a tall order for Jews to re-train Muslims and such folks to love Jews. But maybe they can be trained to bark and bite so furiously at Bad-whitey that they won't bother with Jewish-whitey. This is why yellow dogs are especially useful. Yellows come with either neutral or pro-Jewish attitudes(because they love to suck up to power), and so, Jews can train them to be like Sarah Jeong. As for folks from Latin America, Jews know they can easily make them bark at Gringo. White Latinos have this envy for Anglo-Americans, and so, Latin whites and Jewish whites make common cause to take more from northern whites. As for the browns, they feel resentment against blanco. It doesn't matter whether it's Latin whites or gringo whites. Even as they want to live under richer gringos, they are filled with inferiority complex, and Jews play on that. But Muslims and blacks are problematic dogs to train. Muslims have a very proud religion that isn't about turn-the-other-cheek. Also, POC ideology actually favors them against Jews in a way. Many folks around the world see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as WHITE Jewish colonialists vs brown oppressed. As for blacks, they are dawgs than dogs, or dogs-with-attitude. Unlike yellow dogs and brown dogs, blacks are not easy to train. They like to let the good rabbits run and chase after them. Also, as dawgs are semi-wolf-like in aggression, they get pissed if the master demands too much. Or black dawgs go too far with the aggression. When the Jewish master tells black dawgs to bark at whitey, he doesn't necessarily mean that they should run wild and burn down entire cities, messing things up for gentrification as well. But black dawgs often get out of control, as with BLM fiasco. (So, Jews have been trying to spin it as controlled by Russia.)

    Jewish Power is crucial in the equation because the elites get to call the shots through control of the Megaphone and Methadone. Jews can rouse people to hatred or soothe them with happy feely stuff. Take the Women's March. Why was it shut down for being 'antisemitic' but not 'anti-Palestinian'? After all, many Jewish women in feminism support Zionism that crushes Palestinians in West Bank. Also, lots of Jewish women in media, academia, and Deep State have pushed policies that spread Wars for Israel all over Middle East and North Africa. Why didn't anyone sound the alarm about how feminism and the Women's March movement have too many Zionist and Lesbian women who's been supporting neo-imperialism, Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, and globalist wars? It's because Jews control the means of discourse, the platforms, and the money. To put on massive events, you need money and good media coverage. Jewish Power is okay with Women's March being full of Zionist women and lesbians who support the Deep State and Neo-Imperialism, BUT my oh my, something must be done about all those 'anti-Semites'.
    Consider the anti-BDS laws. It is the Jews who invaded Palestine, drove out native folks and who continue to occupy West Bank. Jews also violate international norms and have 300 nukes made from stolen uranium from the US. But the US sends billions in aid to Israel, and both Political Parties suck up to Jewish Power while Palestinian-Americans and their supporters are fired and blacklisted for standing up for justice for Palestinians. Now, it'd be one thing if one could choose to support or condemn Israel OR support or condemn Palestinians. A matter of personal conscience and liberty. But in the US, one has no choice but to favor Israel over Palestinians in all the institutions and industries that count. If you're homeless, you can use free speech. But if you're a person of any consequence, you will be utterly destroyed if you support BDS.

    Jewish anti-whiteness has several facets to it.

    1. There is fear based on actual history. There have been times when White Christians and Neo-Pagans did hurt Jews real bad. Jews have deep historical memory and know well that history can change fast. So, there is genuine Jewish fear of White Power.

    2. There is whiteness as convenient scapegoat. This is especially useful for Jews because they are the new ruling class. Generally, those on top get the most criticism and abuse from below. Jews don't mind criticism of the elites in Israel because both elites and people are Jewish. So, the criticism of elite power in Israel isn't about 'antisemitism' but abuse and corruption. But in the US, Jews fear that criticism of Jewish elites can turn into anti-Jewish animus or call out on what is essentially Jewish supremacism. Then, it's convenient for Jews to have so many people blame 'white privilege' for all the problems. Even as or especially because Jews constantly vilify Wasps, Jews need them to stick around if only as Evil Icons or Straw Men for bashing. Wasps are the useful decoy or degoy. So, in Hollywood movies, the Face of Evil is usually some Waspy type who heads a corporation or department. Or some Russian-type.

    3. Another reason why Jews are so anti-white is because they are so dependent on white. Even if whites don't become anti-Jewish, Jews hate the notion of white autonomy, or whites feeling pretty good to be white. "It's Okay to be White" pissed off so many Jews. If whites feel that way, they will gain pride and confidence. They would no longer need to atone by obeying a morally superior holy group for redemption. But the fact is Jewish Power is all head and no body. For example, how could the US military serve as the arm of Zionists IF white generals and soldiers feel that the US military exists mainly to serve and defend the US, not to serve in Middle East wars for Israel? So, Jews have to inject continuous doses of 'white guilt' to make whites lose pride and confidence. A guilty people feel they must serve others for atonement, and Jewish Power naturally says 'you must serve us'.
    The Diversity Stuff is really just a ruse. If most Jews are really into Equal Justice for All Peoples, why do they insist the US support Israel against Palestinians, Syria, and Iran? The problem for Jews is that they are essentially pushing a tribal agenda spun as universal agenda. To fool us, Jews use terminology like 'diversity' and 'inclusion' AND iconography of People of Color, but when we look at the nitty-gritty details of globalism, it's always JEWS FIRST and ISRAEL FIRST. Look at US vs Russia, US vs Iran, US vs Palestinians, US vs Syria, US vs Libya, and etc, and the Surest Common Denominator is they are all designed to serve Jewish interests. I mean, what do Mexican-Americans care about Syria? What do black-Americans care about Iran? What do hillbillies in W. Virginia care about expanding NATO to Ukraine? What do Filipino-Americans care about Libya? What do Italian-Americans care about BDS? It's all about Jews, but Jews know they can't sell it as such... so we are told that a nuclear-armed Iran is going to blow up the US, Russia is out to grab the world, China is planning to take over everything, and other such nonsense. Now, I'm thinking that many POC at elite levels know that Jews are full of it, but they go along with the charade because it's their only ticket into the corridors of power and privilege. And this is why Jews love to parade around Obama. He's been a good boy who did the bidding of Jews and their homo allies. He was made president and was showered with millions and millions of money and glorious media coverage. Uncle Charm.
    That said, there is something to admire about Jews. Just consider. Look at all those Muslims in the US military who take orders from the Zionist-controlled government to go destroy Muslim nations. If Muslim-Americans are ordered to drop bombs to kill Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East, they will do so. But imagine if Muslim-Americans have an average IQ of 130, take over much of media and elite institutions. Suppose they use their media and money power to vilify Israel as the greatest abuser of human rights, a 'New Nazi Nation'. Suppose the Muslim-American elites steer the US to use sanctions to kill 100,000s of Jewish kids and to employ shock-and-awe tactics to blow Israel to smithereens. How many Jewish-Americans would join in this massacre? Probably none. On that score, Jews are better than white cucks and Muslim morons.

    4. Another reason why Jews and POC are so anti-white is they are addicted to whiteness. Despite all the anti-white iconoclasm, the fact is whiteness still has tremendous iconic value. Black athletes want blonde white women. Look at Tiger Woods. He was celebrated for his mixed-race-ness but he never went for mixed-race women but for Aryan-looking women. Look at silly Asians with their hair-dyeing and plastic surgery, or their videogames with white-looking characters. Hayao Miyazaki's movies were all set in some white fantasy lands before TORORO, and even there, Asian characters are drawn with features that look more Caucasian. And in Latin America, brown folks are addicted to Soap Opera with mostly white characters. And men in Turkey and Middle East got the Natasha Syndrome.

    https://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/17/world/istanbul-journal-natasha-syndrome-brings-on-a-fever-in-turkey.html

    https://www.forbes.com/2008/11/24/russia-bond-girls-oped-cx_mk_1125kaylan.html#2515ef1b61aa

    Because all the world wants whiteness -- good governance, personable-ness, ability & competence, sexual attraction, balance of reason and emotion, etc -- , they hate the idea of whites owning whiteness. If whites own whiteness, then whites would get to decide what to do with their lands, passion, abilities, sex appeal, legacy, and etc. What's the difference between a woman of dignity and a whore? Woman of dignity has control over her body and decides who can be with her. In contrast, a whore is open to anyone with a few bucks. (Odd thing about Abortion Rights is it's sold as women's control over her own body but actually promotes behavior where she has less self-control because she can always negate the unwanted pregnancy with sucking out the fetus. She can act like a whore without suffering the consequence.) A woman of dignity owns herself and her own body. She gets to determine who can be with her. A whore, on the other hand, has to do what the pimp tells her to. Her body must put out to all comers willing to pay.
    Similarly, white dignity and autonomy would mean that whiteness has value in and of itself. It has meaning as heredity, legacy, heritage, and history. If whites are unique and have dignity, they can decide their own destiny and say NO to non-whites who want to partake of whiteness.
    Then, the ONLY way to make whiteness accessible to all the world is to commoditize it into a product, and the end-logic of this is the pornification of whiteness as meat. And it won't be long before globo-homo forces will call for legalization of prostitution.
    In a way, what was done to Slavic women in Israeli and Arab brothels was hardly different from what is being done to whiteness as a whole all around the world. Whites are being told that they don't own their whiteness. White lands are not white. White history is not white. Ancient Greece was not white. Medieval Europe was not white. White heroes are not white. (Let's cast blacks as Achilles, Julius Caesar, Lancelot, and Hamilton.) White bodies are not white and put out to other races as servings and offerings. So, if 100 million black African men move to Europe, each is deserving of a white womb to produce black babies. And the US as white-envisioned and white-made nation? No way, that's 'racist'. Just let tons of browns from south of the border barge in and grab SWPM or Stuff White People Made. Even though the psycho who killed the plastic surgeon for passing 'white features' to Asians was a nutter, he had a point. Another race was appropriating specific features of whiteness for itself. He was accused of 'white supremacism', but aren't Asians the Real White Supremacists by undergoing surgery to replace 'ugly' Asian features with 'beautiful' white ones? And all these immigration patterns have one thing in common: We want to be with white than with our own kind. Jewish immigration always preferred whiteness.

    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-11/news/mn-22701_1_white-supremacist

    So, this aspect of anti-whiteness is really a paradox. Jews and non-whites beat up on whitey to destroy the notion that proud whites own whiteness. That way, ashamed whites will market whiteness as just a commodity for all of humanity to buy or partake of.

    After all, peoples of all ethnic backgrounds participated in the Soviet project.

    This is “true” in the same way that this statement applies to the Third Reich: millions of people represented very imperfectly by celebrities or tokens, time determining place, and so on.

  222. @Jean Ralphio
    When the video first came out a lot of conservatives accepted the media’s version without any scepticism. Like Tucker Carlson they want to believe it isn’t really about race. These are the conservatives who post MLK quotes on their Facebook page or were angry at the kid because an Indian was involved. I don’t understand the hand-wringing by conservatives over slavery and the Indians. The Soviets and Chinese killed millions of their own people in the last hundred years while we’re supposed to feel bad about things that happened even further back in our history that weren’t nearly as bad.

    I don’t understand the hand-wringing by conservatives over slavery and the Indians

    They are not allowed to speak in their own language.

    They must speak in the language of a hostile elite.

    Simple.

  223. @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    The way out is to cut the Gordian knot. Kick over the table and let the chips fall where they may.

  224. @The Wild Geese Howard
    Folks, it's over:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-23/millennials-gen-z-support-big-govt-academic-brainwashing-or-young-naivete

    Peaceful separation into various ethno-states appears to be the least horrible of all solutions at this point.

    Peaceful separation into various ethno-states

    When this happens, of course, it is rarely peaceful.

    And even with the will, it tends to be very hard to vote your way into dissolution.

  225. @YetAnotherAnon

    "If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say “enough is enough!” what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more “proof” to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time the media uses normal reactions by whites as evidence against us."
     

    Welcome to the dilemma faced by patriotic parties/movements in the UK like the BNP or EDL (or even UKIP). Attacks on you will be ignored by the media if serious injury is caused, if you're chased down the street with things being thrown it'll be used as proof of your unpopularity.

    If you stand your ground and fight (as EDL often do when attacked), or even if you don't, the headlines will read "35 arrested as trouble flares at EDL march" - even if every one of those 35 people is a left winger, and the local press will say "their hate-filled marches bring trouble to our streets" - half-true, but highly misleading because all the trouble comes from the other side.

    If someone finally has enough and goes postal like Thomas Mair - who killed his local Labour MP in the UK - stand by for the canonisation of the victim and 24/7 coverage. If someone like Theo Van Gogh is killed - well, he was asking for it, wasn't he?

    PS - OT, but this is very iSteve

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/oracle-owes-400m-to-women-black-asian-workers-dol-says

    "Oracle Corp. shorted women and minority workers $400 million in wages by paying them less than other employees, steering them into jobs at lower-level positions, and imposing an “extreme preference” for immigrant visa holders, the Labor Department said in a new legal filing."

    Ah jeez. And DJT is the boss of the DoL. What’s the point of winning when we keep losing?

  226. Where’s Jack Hanson, Trump just pussied out again. He has the power give the State of the Union message when he wants to. Now he will wait until Nancy says it is OK. One Term Trump.

    He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    Waiting for Steve to approve my comments in moderation when he wakes up from his Boomer Fainting Couch.

    The SOTU is a non issue.
  227. anon[335] • Disclaimer says:
    @Buzz Mohawk
    From Steve's article in Taki's:

    The Democrats’ fundamental problem is that white people, on the whole, just aren’t hate-filled enough for their strategy to wholly succeed.
    ...
    The supply of white wrongdoing falls short of demand, so our culture offers rich rewards to those who can concoct instances of whites behaving badly.
     
    Those two observations bring to mind a question that is bubbling to the surface now: How can we white Americans navigate the double bind we are in?

    So far, we, on the whole, have been behaving well, like the boy in the video. We have been stoic, even trying to flash friendly smiles now and then to diffuse things, but others continue to aim hate at us. More than that, they continue to try to provoke us into behaving badly.

    If we do eventually reach our tipping point and say "enough is enough!" what are we to do? If we assert ourselves and push back, then they will point at us and say that we are confirming their accusations. Media will shout it in chorus, even louder than they do now.

    We are in a bind, because if we do anything to fight back, we will give those who hate us more "proof" to show the gullible public. This has already happened many times, and every time it has happened the media has used normal reactions by whites as evidence against them.

    It is reasonable to assume that this is a goal of all of the tricks that are being played on us. They (whoever "they" are -- and many here have their theories) are doing their best to provoke us. If we ever rise up, say, like the Yellow Vests, "they" will be able to point at us and put in play even more stringent condemnations. This could lead to actual government restrictions on our behavior. Tighter security, less patience for our free expression.

    There doesn't seem to be any way forward. One senses that we are approaching that point at which many of us, especially the young and strong, like that excellent boy, will take a new tack, take to the streets, and take it out on individuals from all of those peripheral groups that are now opposing us. As the saying goes, "this doesn't end well."

    So, the real point of this comment is to ask for suggestions, ideas. How can white people move forward inside this hideous false reality that has been forced on them? What can we do about this double bind without giving ammunition to those who hate us, the real haters?

    The answer is, we need a war. I don’t care how bad war is. The only thing that will lance this boil and let the puss run out is a civil war. The left will start it, like John Brown’s raid. We should encourage them to start it. Give them ammunition to hate us. Let them start it.

    • Replies: @dfordoom

    The answer is, we need a war. I don’t care how bad war is. The only thing that will lance this boil and let the puss run out is a civil war. The left will start it, like John Brown’s raid. We should encourage them to start it. Give them ammunition to hate us. Let them start it.
     
    Be careful what you wish for.

    Their side has the numbers, it has the military, it has the surveillance state, it has the police, it has the media, it has the corporate sector, it has the bureaucracy. What exactly have you got? OK, you've got Pepe the Frog. Do you think that will be enough?
  228. There is a commenter on here, dfordoom, who is much more intelligent than you, much more insightful than you, and much much more interesting to read than you. And yet you get paid to “write” these boring all the same cut and paste articles while he is relegated to commentatery. Why? Hmm. I’m thinking. What could be the reason. It’s on the tip of my tongue . . .

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    Then there is nothing stopping him from doing what Sailer is doing and see if he can generate a following, the same for me or you.
  229. @Anon
    Whatever they were st one time, the Nee England WASPS are now deranged liberals, especially the Unitarians Congregationalists and the numerous atheists

    Whatever they were st one time, the Nee England WASPS are now deranged liberals, especially the Unitarians Congregationalists and the numerous atheists

    When I was living in Massachusetts, I met quite a few ultra- conservatives……interesting fellows, much sharper, on average, than the hard-right types that I’ve met from other states….

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    much sharper, on average, than the hard-right types that I’ve met from other states….
     
    How did that sharpness manifest itself?
  230. @Johnny789
    I noticed yesterday that the same downgrading of looks thing has happened to Debra Messing. Isn't there an aphorism of some sort about being careful or else your face will permanently freeze in that nastiness that you project to the world.

    Nature gives you the face you have at twenty. Life shapes the face you have at thirty. But at fifty you get the face you deserve.

    Is what I was thinking of.

  231. That’s a hell of a column.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    That’s a hell of a column.

    What about it prompts you to say that?
  232. @The Anti-Gnostic
    Gandhi had numbers. The British Empire could not realistically go full-Pizarro on the Hindu.

    Sovereignty is always consensus by the majority. When the majority of the Soviets no longer believed in the Soviet Union, it disappeared. NATO gave Gaddafi a push, and his regime--and his whole artificial country--toppled over. When the Baltics asked the Russians to leave, they did. Russians don't really have it in them to go full-Pizarro any more.

    ISIS very nearly had their own country, but violent, consumptive religions don't do well turning young people into spouses and parents, which is really all it's all about. ISIS just doesn't have the numbers, so they don't get sovereignty.

    Conservatives are not even half of all white people, and 60 - 90% of the non-whites oppose them politically and culturally. Conservative "Gandhiism" will be crushed.

    You are correct. But remember that, in addition to Ghandiism, there was a lot of anti-British violence taking place in India. While some of us are taking the nonviolent high road, others of us will have to be smashing the china.

    • Agree: utu
  233. @Lot
    "what are we to do? "

    Start thinking about 2020. Call up your nearest local GOP office and offer your time.

    Bugger the Repubs. They will be doing every thing in their power to destroy DJT. They are not our friends. They are more our enemies than the SJWs are.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
  234. @syonredux

    Whatever they were st one time, the Nee England WASPS are now deranged liberals, especially the Unitarians Congregationalists and the numerous atheists
     
    When I was living in Massachusetts, I met quite a few ultra- conservatives......interesting fellows, much sharper, on average, than the hard-right types that I've met from other states....

    much sharper, on average, than the hard-right types that I’ve met from other states….

    How did that sharpness manifest itself?

    • Replies: @syonredux
    Greater awareness of Anglo-American culture, for one thing. I was quite impressed by the way they casually referenced people like Orestes Brownson, John Jay Chapman, Paul Elmer More, etc
    , @anon
    You might take Syon's perspective here with a grain of salt. He's had a hard-on for New England WASPs for years. Just loves extending the HBD conversation to comparisons of various white groups.
  235. @SEATAF
    That's a hell of a column.

    That’s a hell of a column.

    What about it prompts you to say that?

    • Replies: @SEATAF
    I meant that it packs a punch. While, as the author notes, it's a reprise of arguments that are familiar to readers of this blog, this iteration is especially effective.
  236. @Danindc
    If ALL the breaks go our way, Steve will be on a national monument by the year 2100. Hopefully he won’t look like angry giant MLK.

    If another Chinese sculptor gets the gig, Steve will look like Leonid Brezhnev.

    • LOL: Danindc
  237. @J.Ross
    No, it's totally reasonable to use the number 1776 to generally represent the Revolution.

    Did you not see the smiley face?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Well I understand it now but at the time I had ignored it as a typo because there's no light in the world.
  238. @Anonymous

    much sharper, on average, than the hard-right types that I’ve met from other states….
     
    How did that sharpness manifest itself?

    Greater awareness of Anglo-American culture, for one thing. I was quite impressed by the way they casually referenced people like Orestes Brownson, John Jay Chapman, Paul Elmer More, etc

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Thank you.
  239. @Counterinsurgency

    Hillary won the popular vote
     
    Right. So why didn't that translate to the Supreme Executive Power that HC wanted?

    Well, because the Electoral College is the way it is for a reason. People who occupy territory have more on the ground power than do people who don't. The majority vote that Hillary got was from foreign nationals and, to be blunt, vote theft. See what that buys you in a non-electoral process.

    What it comes to is that cities are now islands in a countryside that has rejected them. The cities have no economic importance other than finance, and are in fact unable to so much as maintain their capital plant. They are, moreover, about the only concentrated targets for foreign enemy the US has [1].

    If things come to a serious contest, your side is toast. The Left are fools to rely on violence; it's the one area where they can't compete. This Catholic school business -- the Left has graduated from political violence to terrorism, targeting children _who were playing stupid games assigned them by a Left teacher_. Terrorism unleashes chaos, and you now are the establishment: chaos isn't your friend.

    Counterinsurgency
    1] Copley.
    _Uncivilization_.

    If things come to a serious contest, your side is toast. The Left are fools to rely on violence; it’s the one area where they can’t compete.

    COIN, you may be making incorrect assumptions about what side I’m on.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
    Jenner Ickham Errican

    I'll re-phrase at least that last:

    If things come to a serious contest, the Left is toast. The Left are fools to rely on violence; it’s the one area where they can’t compete.

    Still, the basic question right now is: Who are the American people?

    The "proposition nation" view holds that the American People are those who best hold the American ideals. These ideals are said to be Counter-Enlightenment Postmodernist ideals, so immigrants are the real American people, along with any other group that has been oppressed by the "historical nation" America.

    The "historical nation" view holds that it is those who established and maintain the historical American system that are the real Americans. Right now, that's the rural American blue collars, the people who elected Trump.

    The two sides hold different real estate, with the "proposition nation" holding the cities and (with some large exceptions, such as California) the "historical nation" holding the countryside.

    If you say that America is a proposition nation, then you imply that Trump lacks the confidence of the American people. If you say that American is an "historical nation", then Trump is the President.

    The Electoral College was a political kludge, no question, _but_ there is reality behind it:
    Holding territory is important. Democracies are one of many ways to stabilize government given multiple interests. It is a substitute for and preventative of civil war. Therefore, it has to (in some way) be a war game that estimates the outcome of a civil war, should one occur at election time. In the context of warfare territory matters, so the Electoral College has included territory in the selection process.

    As I keep repeating, war doesn't determine who is right, it determines who is left. The answer to the question "Who are the real American people?" will be determined by who is left in the US in a Century's time. Right now, I'd say that nobody is the real American people -- we just have (at least) two contending groups.

    And I have to watch my responses. I'm getting to be like an animal with a toothache. It was your implication that Trump's selection by the Electoral College rather than the popular vote meant that Trump hadn't been elected by the American people that drew my response. I apologize for any unintentional insult or emotional effect my post might have been responsible for.

    Counterinsurgency




    Counterinsurgency
  240. @Cloudbuster
    Your point? That has always been the rule. Trump won over the right Americans in the right places, not vast numbers of redundant votes in CA. That's how we do it in the USA.

    My point was to factually correct Jack’s Pollyannaish statement. Assuming Jack meant the entire voting population, Trump did not “win over the American people”— but he thankfully did win enough Deplorables to take the Electoral College.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    but he thankfully did win enough Americans to take the Electoral College.
     
    Fixed that for you.

    Do you think of yourself as a Deplorable?
  241. Anonymous[241] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jake
    Tucker Carlson is correct: It is NOT really about race. The Left does not want to destroy white male gays or white male Jews or white males who convert to Islam or even white males who call themselves Christian but back gay marriage and abortion.

    It really is about hating Christ and the ever distancing Christendom. The hatred for whites generally is because whites built and maintained Christendom. Whites who make it clear that they wish to sodomize and effeminize and Judaize and Islamicize - and abort - what is left of Christendom are fully welcomed in the Left and are almost all its most important leaders.

    I agree. Race is a tool. (It can perfectly well be a tool even if you are a realist about racial difference, and even if you are a realist about the fact that many powerful Jews actually do work together, on some level, in ways that undermine the broader society in which they live).
    Race agitators are tools. “Conniving Jews” are tools. Even “money grubbing” capitalists are tools. What ultimately drives things is the hint of sexual license. It is rarely realized. It is NEVER fully realized. But if religion recedes, and especially Christianity, which seems to promise a place in the concrete world, and in eternity, for humans as physical and creative and productive beings, the drive for such things becomes, quite easily, a drive for unlicensed sexuality. If that possibility disappears, life will appear meaningless.

    Harvey Weinstein can f*** all the starlets if he supports “the right to choose”. Bill Clinton can stick it where he wants. Nobody hates the “good” white men, the powerful white men, the white men who can make women feel like they really exist. ALL women like them. (Well, not really, but…)

    Here is an interesting angle on the Battle of the Lincoln Memorial (no one really seems to have put forth a good name for the thing…): has anyone considered the idea that ALL participants might actually be in agreement on something they each regard as DEEPLY important and on which society objects?
    We know what the Covington boys think about killing babies? Yeah, maybe they are “brainwashed” and wanted to “be boys” and have a fun outing, but I suspect the vast majority of them would love to meet a nice girl and repeatedly impregnate her and have many children.
    What about the Black Hebrews? I have no citations, but I am quite confident that they would regard killing black children as an abomination foisted on them by whitey. I bet all of them would gladly leave the street preaching in a moment if they had black women who were inclined towards their brand of myth-making, and would take it is an injunction and rationale to make babies.
    And what of “Elder” Phillips? He is trying to play the media game, and who knows what he might have been quoted saying somewhere, but he clearly just makes sh*t up. Does anyone really doubt that inwardly he feels some genuine pull towards some authentic Indian life, and would find the killing of Indian babies some abomination crafted by the white man?

    So… a clash between whites and blacks and Indians, all of whom inwardly yearn to raise children with real women… who benefits? Perhaps the guys who think they have a fighting chance to pump and dump the hottest sluts, and to realize whatever even more perverse sexual desires lurk within.

    Yes, white men are the enemy. But that is because white men have historically been the best at constructing and fighting for an alternative. And everyone kind of knows this.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    If that possibility disappears, life will appear meaningless
     
    To what possibility do you refer?

    But that is because white men have historically been the best at constructing and fighting for an alternative. And everyone kind of knows this.
     
    An alternative to what?
  242. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    Did you not see the smiley face?

    Well I understand it now but at the time I had ignored it as a typo because there’s no light in the world.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    There is light in the world, though it may not always be visible.
  243. @ChrisZ
    Jenner, what you say is true and sobering, as usual. But I think you’re avoiding Jack’s point. The goal is not conversion of the enemy, but marginalization.

    Leftists are mostly pussies, but since 2008 they’ve been emboldened by a belief that they have become numerically superior in America. With perceived numbers on their side, and thus (in a mass society) a measure of invulnerability, they’ve gone the route of all weak people who suddenly find themselves with unmerited power: they’ve become martinets and bullies.

    The true believers and drivers on the Left are still not numerically a majority (at least that’s my impression). But the trouble is that most regular people are mere followers and easily cowed into submission and acquiescence, so they go along with whoever is dominant in the culture. For most of them, it was only the advent of Trump that clued them into the fact that there were people who were willing to say “F-you” to the Left.

    Our side needs to detach enough of those “followers” from the Left, capture them for our own side, and (this is key) re-jigger the system to permanently diminish and weaken the fringers. That’s going to be difficult, and possibly futile at this point. But I pray it’s within the realm of possibility—and events like this weekend’s fiasco are a glimmer of hope that some “followers” are waking up.

    Jenner, what you say is true and sobering, as usual.

    Thank you.

    The goal is not conversion of the enemy, but marginalization.

    The goal is to win and be in power. By nice means if possible, or not so nice means if necessary. 2020 will be interesting.

    • Replies: @ChrisZ
    Agreed, Jenner. That was the gist of my final paragraph, although your “nice means” / “not so nice means” distinction puts a finer point on it.

    By the way, in reply to another of your comments, I too affirm that there is still light in the world. May it shine out for our posterity’s sake. Take care.
    , @Counterinsurgency
    Right. We're in a fight, and we want to be the ones left when it's over.
    The question is how?
    I'm more of an analyst than a tactician. I can talk about alternative ways things might break and that's it. I did recommend that Trump use various executive orders, as did Obama. I can also see that his choice might be correct -- he's giving the Democratic White leadership enough time to
    a) discredit themselves with the general population (for assuming dictatorial powers) and
    b) to discredit themselves with their coalition members (by not winning quickly).
    Once democracy has been shown to be a farce, Trump can sign executive orders as he pleases. Wilson and FDR both did something very similar -- during wartime it was assumed that democracy and law had to be set aside ("Inter arma enim silent leges", in Latin). If democracy is a farce, that's also an emergency, and we revert to the old Roman Dictator pattern: call in some respected old guy to set things right and restore justice. Old guy to limit the amount of damage he can do if he doesn't work out.

    But oh, the damage done.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi2XCsPKlY8

    Counterinsurgency



    Counterinsurgency
    1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter_arma_enim_silent_leges
    2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictator
  244. @njguy73
    My point is that real life is turning into one big postmodern novel filled with characters like Rev. Reggie Bacon, Charlotte Simmons, Officer Nestor Camacho, Professor Coleman Silk, and Swede Levov.

    I see. And I agree – with one little caveat: You’re right Bacon, Simmons, Officer Camacho, Silk etc. are prototypes of our societies.
    My caveat: That’s what novels are about – since ages: To create characters, which allow the reader to understand and feel even – better what’s going on.
    My caveat: That is what modern literature is all about – and there is basically no difference between – Thomas Manns Felix Krull and Balzac’s Lucien Chardon in Lost IllusionsThe Human Comedy.
    Tom Wolfe was right: The Postmodern novel is the modern novel – is the novel…

    The career of the expression postmodernity is in itself – in its inner unnecessity and intellectual superficiality and hollowness and pompousness – just one more example for the human comedy.

    (If one thinks of Sterne (or Jean Paul as the most advanced German writer of the 18th/19th century) there is not a single aspect of the supposedly postmodern novel, that – Jean Paul especially – would not have shown already (not to mention the Fatrasien of the French middle ages – – – ).

  245. @syonredux
    Greater awareness of Anglo-American culture, for one thing. I was quite impressed by the way they casually referenced people like Orestes Brownson, John Jay Chapman, Paul Elmer More, etc

    Thank you.

  246. @Anonymous
    I agree. Race is a tool. (It can perfectly well be a tool even if you are a realist about racial difference, and even if you are a realist about the fact that many powerful Jews actually do work together, on some level, in ways that undermine the broader society in which they live).
    Race agitators are tools. "Conniving Jews" are tools. Even "money grubbing" capitalists are tools. What ultimately drives things is the hint of sexual license. It is rarely realized. It is NEVER fully realized. But if religion recedes, and especially Christianity, which seems to promise a place in the concrete world, and in eternity, for humans as physical and creative and productive beings, the drive for such things becomes, quite easily, a drive for unlicensed sexuality. If that possibility disappears, life will appear meaningless.

    Harvey Weinstein can f*** all the starlets if he supports "the right to choose". Bill Clinton can stick it where he wants. Nobody hates the "good" white men, the powerful white men, the white men who can make women feel like they really exist. ALL women like them. (Well, not really, but...)

    Here is an interesting angle on the Battle of the Lincoln Memorial (no one really seems to have put forth a good name for the thing...): has anyone considered the idea that ALL participants might actually be in agreement on something they each regard as DEEPLY important and on which society objects?
    We know what the Covington boys think about killing babies? Yeah, maybe they are "brainwashed" and wanted to "be boys" and have a fun outing, but I suspect the vast majority of them would love to meet a nice girl and repeatedly impregnate her and have many children.
    What about the Black Hebrews? I have no citations, but I am quite confident that they would regard killing black children as an abomination foisted on them by whitey. I bet all of them would gladly leave the street preaching in a moment if they had black women who were inclined towards their brand of myth-making, and would take it is an injunction and rationale to make babies.
    And what of "Elder" Phillips? He is trying to play the media game, and who knows what he might have been quoted saying somewhere, but he clearly just makes sh*t up. Does anyone really doubt that inwardly he feels some genuine pull towards some authentic Indian life, and would find the killing of Indian babies some abomination crafted by the white man?

    So... a clash between whites and blacks and Indians, all of whom inwardly yearn to raise children with real women... who benefits? Perhaps the guys who think they have a fighting chance to pump and dump the hottest sluts, and to realize whatever even more perverse sexual desires lurk within.

    Yes, white men are the enemy. But that is because white men have historically been the best at constructing and fighting for an alternative. And everyone kind of knows this.

    If that possibility disappears, life will appear meaningless

    To what possibility do you refer?

    But that is because white men have historically been the best at constructing and fighting for an alternative. And everyone kind of knows this.

    An alternative to what?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    In response to the first question, what I meant was that "sex", broadly speaking, even if rarely realized in the imagined form, ends up being what gives meaning to life for people who otherwise perceive the world in a desacralized and materialistic form. This, I think, is why many SJWs fight SO hard. No doubt many get a rush from the groupthink and all, and SJWism per se is a sort of religion. But the idea of sexual self-realization as at the core of it is rarely articulated, NOT even in the promulgation of all the variants of LGBTism.

    Obviously, not all those who profess to be atheists, agnostics, etc, act in such ways, but my own suspicion is that most who give any credence to the idea of any sort of sexual morality are actively adhering to moral habits inculcated via ancestors in recent memory who were themselves religious in some real sense. Or else they are following "atheistic" philosophies, such as Stoicism in some form, that end up being religious in a way not always articulated.

    As for the second question, what I meant was that white men have been most successful in crafting alternatives to might-makes-right societies fueled by uninhibited sexuality. The Socrates-Plato-Aristotle nexus in Athens was in part such an effort (and so also the various ancient philosophies that drew from them). But then Christian culture (which incorporated much of Greek philosophy), forged an alternative to the sex-and-power depravities of the Roman empire.
  247. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    My point was to factually correct Jack’s Pollyannaish statement. Assuming Jack meant the entire voting population, Trump did not “win over the American people”— but he thankfully did win enough Deplorables to take the Electoral College.

    but he thankfully did win enough Americans to take the Electoral College.

    Fixed that for you.

    Do you think of yourself as a Deplorable?

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Do you think of yourself as a Deplorable?
     
    Yes, of course. Note the capital D, it’s a proper noun that instantly came to mean something other than Hillary meant it to mean.

    https://www.google.com/images?q=deplorable+shirt

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjZy2_wSuZg
  248. @Anonymous

    Is it possible that the White boy vs. the Indian is one of this ersatz ideas that will get us nowhere?
     
    What is the "the White boy vs. Indian" idea?

    I think the answer is in #95 comment.

  249. @Colin Wright
    'What ive learened...'

    My latest theory is that you're actually on the radical Right and are practising black propaganda. After all, consider '6. those kids deserve the ultimate punishment.' Obviously, we're intended to believe someone from the Left still thinks that.

    The inconsistent misspellings confirm this. You can't handle 'I've' but manage to negotiate 'ultimate punishment' without a slip?

    I'm skeptical. This is faked, isn't it?

    I’m skeptical. This is faked, isn’t it?

    You catch on fast.

  250. Great piece. I read it out loud to my wife, aka @wokemontecitowoman, and she nodded along enthusiastically to all your points.

  251. @An Immigrant
    All I can say is that
    "It is just the beginning".
    America's future would be more like that of South Africa not like Brazil where Whites are the Elite.
    Efforts to seize White wealth will probably begin
    In a few years and Leftists will be claiming that
    "White man White woman couples" are racist and that having White babies is a form of Racism.

    Our country is run by the equivalent of the most primitive tribes of Africa. They believe that if something bad happens it’s because some enemy cast a wicked spell. Here’s the American equivalent: Blacks commit a lot of crime and Hispanics do badly in school? Vicious white people cast spells to make it happen. Can’t find actual, individual vicious white people hexing blacks or Hispanics? Invent a new kind of collective spell called “institutional racism,” so you can blame all white people. And when you find someone who doesn’t believe in spells but talks about race and IQ, crucify him.

    Some really excellent comments on this thread – keep it up! We appreciate it.

  252. @J.Ross
    Well I understand it now but at the time I had ignored it as a typo because there's no light in the world.

    There is light in the world, though it may not always be visible.

  253. @penskefile
    My child's Catholic high school sent a contingent to the March for Life as well. It took them a three-day bus ride to get there (my son did not attend, but some of his friends did). The parents I know are more resolved than ever to go back. I think next year will be record attendance as this incident has really struck a chord among our demographic. We all saw our kid in Nick Sandmann

    Would be quite the troll if Trump came out said “if I had a son, he’d look like Nick Sandmann …”

    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
  254. Anon[318] • Disclaimer says:

    Remember Kavanaugh and “High School Never Ends (Part Leventy Seven)”?

    I saw this today and realized I’d seen several tweets to the effect of “I was triggered, that exact guy was in my high/middle school!” relating to MAGA kid.

    The most insidious bully in my junior high wasn’t someone who stuffed smaller kids in lockers, but a smaller kid himself: slender, handsome, with a last name that appeared on a big building in town. What he would do, mostly, was stare. Stare and smile, and walk very close to his less-rich, less-handsome targets. Not touching, but close enough to show that he could have touched them if he wanted to.

    Complaining to adults was useless, because he insisted he wasn’t doing anything, and teachers — reading the letter of the school handbook rather than the spirit — were forced to agree.

    And it’s funny, how awful “not doing anything” can feel to the person it’s not being done to. How infuriating or unsettling.

    It’s funny, what a slender rich kid’s vehement denial can do to your mind-set: Maybe he wasn’t doing anything. Maybe he was just smiling. Maybe he was just smiling even when you made it clear you were trying to pass, and you were on the verge of tears? Maybe he was trying to defuse the situation, and you’re the one who was crazy.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-covington-students-and-the-calculated-art-of-making-people-uncomfortable/2019/01/23/817ffbba-1e8f-11e9-8e21-59a09ff1e2a1_story.html