RSS
From BBC:
Germany shocked by Cologne New Year gang assaults on women
59 minutes agoCologne officials say the systematic assaults on women are a new type of crime
The mayor of Cologne has summoned police for crisis talks after about 80 women reported sexual assaults and muggings by men on New Year’s Eve.
The scale of the attacks on women at the city’s central train station has shocked Germany. About 1,000 drunk and aggressive young men were involved.
City police chief Wolfgang Albers called it “a completely new dimension of crime”. The men were of Arab or North African appearance, he said.
… At least one woman was raped, and many were groped. Most of the crimes reported to police were robberies. A volunteer policewoman was among those sexually molested.
What is particularly disturbing is that the attacks appear to have been organised. Around 1,000 young men arrived in large groups, seemingly with the specific intention of carrying out attacks on women.
A policeman who was outside Cologne station during the New Year’s Eve trouble told the city’s Express news website that he had detained eight suspects. “They were all asylum seekers, carrying copies of their residence certificates,” he said.
However, there was no official confirmation that asylum seekers had been involved in the violence. Commentators in Germany were quick to urge people not to jump to conclusions.
Feminist Susan Brownmiller’s 1975 suggestion that sexual assault can be viewed as a political crime makes a fair amount of sense.
This is reminiscent of the “wilding” phenomenon in New York in the late ’80s/early ’90s, made famous by the Central Park Jogger case.
You’re missing an “n” in “Germany” in the headline, btw, Steve.
These single lonely Arab Muslim men in Germany just want some sexy time (in Borat accent). Since when did sexy time become rape?
I’m sorry to say that Merkel may go down in history as Germany’s greatest traitor. Still I ask: what the hell possessed her?
Sorry Germany you'll just need to get used to that pee smell.
The need for approval from the media, from fellow politicians, from the people with whom she socializes at Davos and other meetings and conferences. And she got what she wanted - she's Time's person of the year.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2PSa3AzxskQ/T6ww3aqpaWI/AAAAAAAAJQU/E32VFSHOamU/s1600/group-differences.jpg
Just bright enough to work the system and manipulate the less bright and those in their own range, which amounts to about 80% of the total population. Not bright enough to see the consequences of their actions.
Possessing fairly base motives, like desire for popularity, to offset the meager hostilities they've experienced for being a little smart and the resentment they have of the brighter fraction.
Wanting to be like the dead-nuts-on-mean-IQ jocks (e.g.)...unable to.
In Merkel's case, add the element of being a female nobody wanted to mate with. She's got to distinguish herself somehow. There's something psychosexually very weird about her importing masses of swarthy young virile mean-IQ-85ish types. Seems absolutely designed to get even with white German men. And the white German women who got what she didn't (spouse, children, family),.
Of course I don't know what Merkel's IQ is. Anybody got any references or estimates?
I guess the other possibility is that she's bright enough to qualify for the top 20%, which can bring its own set of problems. But the fact that she started out as a commie tells me that she's more of the apparatchik class who soared high on the female vote and the Tulip Mania of gynephilia.
You're missing an "n" in "Germany" in the headline, btw, Steve.
While a typo, Merkel’s Germany is getting a lot more germy given the reported rate of diseases like TB for the Arab migrants and HIV from the Africans. And you know where the left hands of the Arab migrants have been.
“The scale of the attacks on women at the city’s central train station has shocked Germany. About 1,000 drunk and aggressive young men were involved.”
Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.
” Most of the crimes reported to police were robberies.”
Robbing women of their purses and wallets. These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.
These Arab Muslim men harassing and robbing White German women are the next Steve Jobs according to the Leftist invite the world elites.
Well, look at the bright side of things. At least, they are showing signs of assimilating. You know the old adage: when in Germany, do as the Germans do.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/12/heres-how-isis-uses-amphetamines-to-create-brainwashed-psychotic-killing-machines/
We are often told by MSM that Muslims are modest, conservative and do not drink. The truth is that they have no higher morals than westerners when it comes to cheating, drinking, using drugs and act outrageously. Muslim women tend to be more conservative wearing a veil – often it depends on which country she comes from and what social statues she has. European Muslim women from Albania and former Yugoslavia tend not wear a veil. Muslims are in general from third world countries and they bring the same problem as non-Muslim from third world countries. A growing concern is Albanian (Muslim) prostitutes – working in Vienna, Berlin, Amsterdam and Rome.
It is a growing concern in Europe with Muslim men seeing non-veiled women as prostitutes. Among Muslims a veiled woman is a protected woman and so she cannot be touched. As most Muslim migrants are men there is an acute shortage of Muslim women and their difficulty to find employment make it difficult to them to find a wife. Indigenous white women are therefore often sexual targets. In many these women are young, naïve and do not understand that these Muslim men do not understand western social codes.
It does not make it easier than the liberal elites of Western Europe encourage unreasonable behaviour among migrant groups and tell them that their white indigenous people of Europe are “racists” and therefore a morally legit target. Here in Untied States police is actually there to protect citizens from criminals and not to spree “peace, love and understanding”. US police enjoy very much respect among the general population although most people are rightfully critical of them when they use too much force. The far-left and the ghastly ignorant liberals in Washington DC seem to hate them and try to make them just as weak as the police in Europe. Trump is sort of a mainstream candidate in United States and his first Ad looks like this;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa3edsMzHkA
Europe is just too far-out to the left and I think will backfire and allow the violent far-right to grow rapidly which will hurt innocent Muslims.
Bring back Gerhard Schroeder!
at a much smaller scale the same seems to have happened in the cities Hamburg and Stuttgart aswell.
In Cologne the whole event took place in front of the main train station, at the foot of the Cologne cathedral. The cathedral has a side entry which goes directly to this square. At the top of this entry there is currently a huge antiracist / pro-refugee statement hanging at the wall.
It is funny how those people get called “asylum seekers” now. Why not simply call them refugees?
Actually those people did much likely not come this to Germany, but rather 3,4 years ago. After the Arab Spring started already a lot of North Africans came Europe and claimed being refugees.
Big western german cities, especially Cologne, have suffered from violence and crime of exactly this group for years.
Actually the Arab Spring seems to have two main variants:
1) the Egypt variant which means young mean sexually molesting women like on the Tahrir square in Cairo
2) the Syria variant which means Sunni muslims trying to expel or murder every Non-Muslim.
Hitler issued orders from the bunker that German society be destroyed. Maybe Merkel is just following through.
Like the NY Puerto Rican Day parade in 2000:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_Day_Parade_attacks
Taki wrote about it, Geraldo threatened him, but we never got to see the boxing match:
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/gossip/rivera-defends-el-barrio-taki-display-article-1.760123
Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.
" Most of the crimes reported to police were robberies."
Robbing women of their purses and wallets. These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.
These Arab Muslim men harassing and robbing White German women are the next Steve Jobs according to the Leftist invite the world elites.
“Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.”
Well, look at the bright side of things. At least, they are showing signs of assimilating. You know the old adage: when in Germany, do as the Germans do.
He could be found every evening alone (with two minders) in the lounge drinking Dom Perignon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_Day_Parade_attacks
Taki wrote about it, Geraldo threatened him, but we never got to see the boxing match:
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/gossip/rivera-defends-el-barrio-taki-display-article-1.760123
Even at 80, Taki probably still has too much for the ludicrous “Geraldo”.
The problems have just started. Those mobs are flexing their muscle and realizing they’ve got the run of things; they can do what they want with impunity. The natives in parts of Europe are going to be cowering in fear, hiding behind gates and keeping their daughters and wives cooped up. What a life. Merkel wouldn’t give the Greeks a break but suddenly felt generous towards this alien rabble for whatever reason. All public spaces such as parks, train stations, street corners are going to be hot spots from now on since these ‘asylum seekers’ are indolent and like to spend their time loitering about harassing anyone passing by.
Where shall the Germans take refuge?
Is this question ever asked?
No camels in Germany. Can you blame these poor youts for getting frustrated?
To be fair, it seems the perpetrators weren’t Syrians or Iraqis, but mostly from North Africa. But this shows what a joke Germany has become: It’s obvious these people aren’t genuine “refugees”, have no claim to asylum whatsoever and in many cases have probably entered Germany with criminal intentions. Any serious country would round them up (and rough them up in the process) and deport them. Instead they’re allowed to stay for years, game the system and commit crimes with a (to a large degree justified) feeling of impunity. Germany is pathetic (and the state of North-Rhine-Westphalia where Cologne is especially so, it’s known for being hyper-pc, corrupt and inefficient).
What is wrong with you, Steve? Don’t you support our Sacred GDP?
Look at the links below and the selected quotes from said links:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/looking-for-a-global-growth-strategy-support-refugees/2015/10/01/e446e2b4-66d1-11e5-9223-70cb36460919_story.html
“Looking for a global growth strategy? Support refugees.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-portes/economic-europe-refugees_b_8128288.html
“Immigration Is Good for Economic Growth. If Europe Gets It Right, Refugees Can Be Too.”
http://www.wsj.com/articles/politics-hold-sway-in-economic-impact-of-europes-refugee-crisis-1443034512
“On one thing, almost all economists agree: In the long term, the refugee crisis ought to be unambiguously positive for the European economy. Over time, the new arrivals should play an important role in addressing Europe’s alarming demographic trends, improving the ratio of workers to those who are economically inactive, a ratio that is falling in many countries.”
These mainstream media corporations support economic growth via refugee immigration, Steve. Why don’t you support that as well?
Are you a commie or something?
Don’t you love Capitalism, Steve?
Don’t you love Our Holy GDP?
You do realize, don’t you, that many of our most illustrious mainstream media outlets are struggling to survive? You do realize that economic growth is needed to keep these wonderful media outlets afloat? Don’t you love Our Sacred Mainstream Media, Steve?
More on the assaults, the cover-up and the backlash from Germany (in English): http://www.thelocal.de/20160104/refugees-blamed-for-mass-sexual-assault-in-cologne
Even NYT noticed
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/01/04/world/europe/ap-eu-germany-sex-assaults.html?_r=2
but apparently Facebook is removing mentions of the incident in Germany.
but apparently Facebook is removing mentions of the incident in Germany.
What does that even mean about Facebook? (I don't use it, obviously). The story (see link above) is all over the German press.
This type of political opinion engineering and manipulation has been a standard ideological warfare tactic. There is a growing awareness, resentment, and backlash to this type of left-wing ideological censorship and Facebook is feeding right into this.
And if these were “genuine refugees”? Then Germans would just have to endure it, no matter what?
Merkel was a communist youth leader, and apparently “destruction of western civilization” program is still running in her brain…
Including Merkel's Ossi compatriots (who highlight the difference quite particularly when compared to west germans).
If anything Merkel is just being as 'westerner' as possible.
Be nice if some of these “Commentators” were quick to urge people to not jump to conclusions every time a black guy is shot by the police.
Jared Taylor believes that Black Lies Matter is a blessing in disguise in that the longer they exist to spew anti-White garbage, the more Right Wing Whites it creates in the process.
Lara Logan of CBS News was attacked in the same way in a similar celebratory moment in Cairo’s Tahrir Square in the moments after Hosni Mubarak announced he was stepping down. It seems to be a thing.
She gave an all details interview to CBS News and the NYT a few months later. She still struggles with major health problems arising from the assault five years ago.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/lara-logan-breaks-silence-on-cairo-assault/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_Day_Parade_attacks
Taki wrote about it, Geraldo threatened him, but we never got to see the boxing match:
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/gossip/rivera-defends-el-barrio-taki-display-article-1.760123
That was an interesting article about the event. I remember the event but I don’t remember the neocon Guliani getting involved and denouncing Taki. Rivera is a joke and I still can’t forget how “conservatives” embraced him after he went to Fox post 9/11.
Angie is just a Crazy Cat Lady writ large. She’ll be there in her housecoat and slippers throwing cat kibble at them as long as they keep coming.
Sorry Germany you’ll just need to get used to that pee smell.
Sorry Germany you’ll just need to get used to that pee smell."
Someone forgot to throw a big plastic furniture cover over Cologne.
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/the-crazy-cat-lady-stage-of-america/
You're missing an "n" in "Germany" in the headline, btw, Steve.
And then there was that Puerto Rican Day parade in Manhattan ten years ago or so. Groups of young horny Puerto Rican men milling around in Central Park started groping girls and tearing their clothes off. As I remember, some French tourist girl got it worst of all.
Feminist Susan Brownmiller’s 1975 suggestion that sexual assault can be viewed as a political crime makes a fair amount of sense.
This must be Steve’s version of a Triple Bank Shot ™, because actually, no it does not make any sense at all.
That that's not what Susan Brownmiller had in mind makes Steve's observation all the more clever.
No, you’ve misunderstood me…I’m against taking in masses of Sunni Arabs per se, I’m absolutely against Merkel’s policy. The point I wanted to make is: Germany is too pc and too weak to act resolutely even against people whose asylum claims are obviously fraudulent and who are obviously just criminal scum. That’s how bad it is.
“Be nice if some of these “Commentators” were quick to urge people to not jump to conclusions every time a black guy is shot by the police.”
Jared Taylor believes that Black Lies Matter is a blessing in disguise in that the longer they exist to spew anti-White garbage, the more Right Wing Whites it creates in the process.
I’m old enough to remember when European cities were an oasis from the crime and violence of US cities. And looks like I’ll live long enough to see a time when the opposite will be true.
Two predictions:
1. Property theft and pickpocketing are now worse in most big European cities than US cities. I expect we’ll see (or already are seeing?) a spike in violent crime in Europe. The increase in crime in each region will be proportional to the number of refugees settled there.
2. US “racist,” “facist” policing and incarceration policies, so criticized by Europeans back in the 70s and 80s will soon become standard operating procedure in Europe. Within 5 years, expect there to be a lot of handwringing in Europe about “disparate impact” between native and refugee populations when it comes to arrests, incarceration rates, etc, etc…
Sorry Germany you'll just need to get used to that pee smell.
“Angie is just a Crazy Cat Lady writ large. She’ll be there in her housecoat and slippers throwing cat kibble at them as long as they keep coming.
Sorry Germany you’ll just need to get used to that pee smell.”
Someone forgot to throw a big plastic furniture cover over Cologne.
Sorry Germany you’ll just need to get used to that pee smell.'
Someone forgot to throw a big plastic furniture cover over Cologne."
You're too kind. Trapping feral cats and carting them off to a kill shelter is much more effective. Though I can see where Germany might find that method has troubling historical connotations.
On the bright side, feminists finally have a real-world example of their pet word ‘intersectionality’. Germany is now a virtual petri dish of intersecting systems of oppression and discrimination; a synergistic blending of sexism, Islamophobia, bigotry, homophobia, and racism.
Will feminists concern themselves with those German women who were actually raped and sexually assaulted? Or will the skin color and exotic origins of the male assaulters trump the victimhood status of white women?
Fascinating.
If only Haven Monahan were found within that vibrant flash mob. Just one Haven would be enough, really.
And, since Eastern Europe went unmentioned, I suppose that writers like Gogol and Pushkin are also acceptable?
You're missing an "n" in "Germany" in the headline, btw, Steve.
No, given the facts in the story, it sounds like the “n” is there now…
Well, look at the bright side of things. At least, they are showing signs of assimilating. You know the old adage: when in Germany, do as the Germans do.
I learned all I need to know about Islam and drinking alcohol on my honeymoon in Bermuda. We were given a serious upgrade in accommodations, as the entire 4th floor of the resort was occupied by Prince Bandar and his retinue on a spur-of-the-moment vacation.
He could be found every evening alone (with two minders) in the lounge drinking Dom Perignon.
She’s the same as every other leader in Western Europe and North America, only more so. She is different in degree, not in kind, from people like David Cameron or Jeb Bush.
Unless the media are gloating things in Germany must be really bad for the BBC to tell the truth about something like this.
The EU is 100% on board so it’s an EU thing not just Merkel
- Merkel says come to Germany
- infinite numbers start coming
- EU says everyone must share
- pass laws to force member states to take a percentage of infinite numbers
- inevitable demographic extinction
Yes, when enough of them realise there’s not enough police.
German reader, isn’t this enough to break the hold of PC, which is at base a fraudulent ideology? I mean at some point, don’t people’s minds change, especially when concrete interests like order and security are threatened? . It’s not like a religion or something. Or maybe it is, after only a generation.
(Sorry to usurp 'German Reader' and for the foul language).
This must be Steve's version of a Triple Bank Shot (tm), because actually, no it does not make any sense at all.
I think it makes sense as: mass rape can be a consequence of political decisions.
That that’s not what Susan Brownmiller had in mind makes Steve’s observation all the more clever.
Wo nehmen die Deutschen Zuflucht?
Where shall the Germans take refuge?
Is this question ever asked?
Two predictions:
1. Property theft and pickpocketing are now worse in most big European cities than US cities. I expect we'll see (or already are seeing?) a spike in violent crime in Europe. The increase in crime in each region will be proportional to the number of refugees settled there.
2. US "racist," "facist" policing and incarceration policies, so criticized by Europeans back in the 70s and 80s will soon become standard operating procedure in Europe. Within 5 years, expect there to be a lot of handwringing in Europe about "disparate impact" between native and refugee populations when it comes to arrests, incarceration rates, etc, etc...
Same here. Start visiting Poland, Czecho-Slovakia and Hungary. They’re still nice and “European”. Especially Poland.
It’s interesting that this news seems to have taken several days to emerge.
As this news went mainstream, so this Guardian piece became deluged with angry comments – comments were turned off just a few minutes ago, as I imagine they were coming in faster than they could be deleted.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/05/europes-citizens-need-start-debate-diversity
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/01/04/world/europe/ap-eu-germany-sex-assaults.html?_r=2
but apparently Facebook is removing mentions of the incident in Germany.
http://www.dw.com/en/top-stories/germany/s-1432
but apparently Facebook is removing mentions of the incident in Germany.
What does that even mean about Facebook? (I don’t use it, obviously). The story (see link above) is all over the German press.
So it seems there's been a switch in the interim where the media is talking about something while the social media is still being censored.
Maybe just a one-off cos this incident was too big to cover up or maybe something bigger.
Hopefully more and more Germans will wake up to the reality that their political elite doesn't care about public safety and security at all.
Under Hitler, Germany got invaded because it invaded.
Under Merkel, Germany got invaded because it invited.
At least Soviet troops left.
These new invaders will stay and bring more of their kind.
No. The pretence by Brownmiller and other Jewish feminists that the rape threat comes from white men – that’s the real political crime.
In an interview in “People,” Brownmiller bravely pointed out the big rise in black-on-white rapes in the era and suggested it was tied into leftist ideologies of the time.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/report-decade-of-pakistani-pimps-grooming-white-adolescents-ignored-because-officials-feared-appearing-racist/#comment-681122
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/world/europe/coordinated-attacks-on-women-in-cologne-were-unprecedented-germany-says.html
Times has picked it up.
Springtime, for migrants, in Germanee! Winter for Hamburg and Koln.
(I had to say it).
http://www.thelocal.de/20160104/refugees-blamed-for-mass-sexual-assault-in-cologne
Don’t know what “The Local” is but much about accusations of media cover-up.
Looks like Germany needs to follow Norway’s lead and conduct some “No Rapin’” classes. It might even be worthwhile to put some “Head Start” “No Rapin’” classes in place.
No, I don’t think this will really change much…mainstream media have now covered this story (they pretty much had no other choice), but eventually the standard script will kick in “Only a small minority of asylum seekers do things like that, we mustn’t let right-wingers exploit this, we must now double our efforts at integrating the refugees”. The powers that be and the “good” people will never admit they’ve been wrong.
http://www.westfalen-blatt.de/OWL/Lokales/Kreis-Lippe/Detmold/2069675-13-jaehriges-Maedchen-aus-Asien-von-Landsmann-missbraucht-Verdaechtiger-in-U-Haft-Polizei-aeussert-sich-nach-Berichterstattung-Im-Fluechtlingsheim-vergewaltigt-Oeffentlichkeit-soll-nichts-erfahren
About the German police deliberately staying silent about the rape of a 13 year old girl in a Detmold refugee accommodation.
He could be found every evening alone (with two minders) in the lounge drinking Dom Perignon.
As I recall, several of the 9/11 hijackers were whooping it up in some bars in Deerfield Beach, Florida. I guess you need a few drinks under your belt if you’re going to hook up soon with 72 virgins.
They flew to Boston from the Portland Jetport on 9/11.
A lot of great stuff is happening. First of all, more evince of the Trump effect:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/05/ted-cruz-ad-shows-bunch-business-professionals-crossing-border-illegally/
At the Daily Caller, this article on Japan is still among the “most popular” despite having been published in October.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/23/sweden-opened-its-doors-to-muslim-immigration-today-its-the-rape-capital-of-the-west-japan-didnt/
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/01/04/world/europe/ap-eu-germany-sex-assaults.html?_r=2
but apparently Facebook is removing mentions of the incident in Germany.
Facebook CEO Zuckerberg said he would censor anti-migrant sentiment. Censoring news isn’t a surprise.
This type of political opinion engineering and manipulation has been a standard ideological warfare tactic. There is a growing awareness, resentment, and backlash to this type of left-wing ideological censorship and Facebook is feeding right into this.
According to the ‘progressive globalist’ or proglob elites, unruly British soccer fans are bad.
But unruly mobs on non-white invaders? Shhhhh.
http://newobserveronline.com/mass-invader-sex-attacks-in-stuttgart-hamburg/
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/01/04/world/europe/ap-eu-germany-sex-assaults.html?_r=2
but apparently Facebook is removing mentions of the incident in Germany.
You mean, if I “like” an article about this incident, Facebook will remove it from my “wall”? (Apologies for imprecise language, I don’t do Facebook.)
but apparently Facebook is removing mentions of the incident in Germany.
What does that even mean about Facebook? (I don't use it, obviously). The story (see link above) is all over the German press.
The German media were censoring all the attacks – long before the Cologne thing – but people were still talking about local incidents on social media like Facebook and spreading the news that way so the German govt got FB to delete any comments about invader crime. This was in the news a few days ago.
So it seems there’s been a switch in the interim where the media is talking about something while the social media is still being censored.
Maybe just a one-off cos this incident was too big to cover up or maybe something bigger.
Hopefully more and more Germans will wake up to the reality that their political elite doesn’t care about public safety and security at all.
As these incidents continue, cell phone video evidence will mount, the public is eager to see, many outlets will be eager to host and cover, and Facebook can't stop them.
Under Merkel, Germany got invaded because it invited.
At least Soviet troops left.
These new invaders will stay and bring more of their kind.
No, these new invaders will not stay in Europe.
Never before has it been easier to move large numbers of populations around the world.
Apparently not just Cologne
http://newobserveronline.com/mass-invader-sex-attacks-in-stuttgart-hamburg/
what’s that word for a slave raid – ragaza or something?
"ragazza" is Italian for "girl".
The f*cking stupid Italians now import Moroccans by the million.
Germany f*cked them over then - they turned Italy into a battle ground, a prolonged, destructive, gut wrenching battle ground.
Now Germany is being, literally, f*cked over by some rather nasty, priapic Moroccans, and the current Fuhrerlein is protecting them.
I simply cannot get over the dumbness of white people. Or the evil of The Economist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razzia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghazi_(warrior)
but apparently Facebook is removing mentions of the incident in Germany.
What does that even mean about Facebook? (I don't use it, obviously). The story (see link above) is all over the German press.
good question, i have yet to use Facebook so wonder how they can censor news reports or their customers views. If a Facebook user supports Trump will they be blacklisted from Facebook ?
From the NYT writeup:
Wow, that is really interesting! Can you imagine something like that going unreported for days in the US?
Compare and contrast saturation Trayvon or Michael Brown hysteria to the Wichita massacre, that is if you have even have heard of the Wichita massacre.
The New York Times article has more enjoyable quotes:
For those who missed this prophetic 2007 video:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Rd8cRvZZv44
they are changing the name “ger” be racist “many”be sexist. how about gerkey.
From Steve Sailer:
In an interview in “People,” Brownmiller bravely pointed out the big rise in black-on-white rapes in the era and suggested it was tied into leftist ideologies of the time.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/report-decade-of-pakistani-pimps-grooming-white-adolescents-ignored-because-officials-feared-appearing-racist/#comment-681122
[…] [Comment at Unz.com.] […]
So it seems there's been a switch in the interim where the media is talking about something while the social media is still being censored.
Maybe just a one-off cos this incident was too big to cover up or maybe something bigger.
Hopefully more and more Germans will wake up to the reality that their political elite doesn't care about public safety and security at all.
The German government even put an ex-Stasi agent (!) in charge of censoring all ‘xenophobic’ Facebook posts: http://www.infowars.com/ex-stasi-agent-hired-to-censor-xenophobic-facebook-posts/
http://newobserveronline.com/mass-invader-sex-attacks-in-stuttgart-hamburg/
what's that word for a slave raid - ragaza or something?
Don’t you mean “razzia”?
“ragazza” is Italian for “girl”.
Watch, the response to this from the elite will be to fast track female refugees into Germany.
This must be Steve's version of a Triple Bank Shot (tm), because actually, no it does not make any sense at all.
of course rape can be some kind of political act, this is almost always the case when to different ethnicities are involved
White women have enjoyed privileges for so long that they never knew they had them, like a fish not being aware of water. The ability to go out in public without a man to protect them is something not enjoyed by the majority of the world’s women, and not even imaginable to many of them. It was something European women could do before mass non-white immigration. These immigrants belong to races to whom the modern Western concept of rape is incomprehensible, and will remain so.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/05/ted-cruz-ad-shows-bunch-business-professionals-crossing-border-illegally/
At the Daily Caller, this article on Japan is still among the "most popular" despite having been published in October.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/23/sweden-opened-its-doors-to-muslim-immigration-today-its-the-rape-capital-of-the-west-japan-didnt/
Yup. This is what Sweden has turned into: http://www.wvwnews.net/content/index.php?/news_story/who_was_ellen_krantz.html
those who really believe know only one direction, like a fly trapped in the ear. Whatever happens, they only believe even more and hate non-believers even more. Apart from that at some point it will be too late. I have always thought that way, but by now I think in the case of Germany the point where it is to late to wake up is coming up fast. This year there were around 1.3 million invaders, another 3-5 million and it is over.
that´s it. And it is not only the leaders. It is politicians on all levels who are basically the same
And so we begin……endgame……
(Sorry, but a third-rate world deserves a third-rate cliche to sum up even its most profound tragedies.)
What’s happening in Germany is a speeded up version of what happened in France, UK, Holland etc over the last 20-40 years.
The political and media elite both wanted the majority of immigrants to come from the bottom of the deck: the cultural left for the guaranteed votes, the economic right for the cheap labor, and as a result they imported large numbers of mostly young men into selected areas and as a result those areas were plunged into
- violent competition for females
- gang violence
- sexual violence
- forced prostitution
however because it was slow and gradual and one area at a time it was easy for the media to cover it up.
Merkel has turbo-charged it.
I don’t know of any hard evidence that they were actually from north Africa, do you? I think the police chief was just being a diffident ethnologist, listing all the potential places of origin that might be compatible with their appearance and speech.
Ease of horizontal transmission breeds virulence.
I don’t know about the ‘fish being unaware of water’ bit, but that classic old feminist refrain involved men and ‘fish needing bicycles’.
Where have you been all your life?
Compare and contrast saturation Trayvon or Michael Brown hysteria to the Wichita massacre, that is if you have even have heard of the Wichita massacre.
Well, you don't have to guess you just already know.
As this news went mainstream, so this Guardian piece became deluged with angry comments - comments were turned off just a few minutes ago, as I imagine they were coming in faster than they could be deleted.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/05/europes-citizens-need-start-debate-diversity
If diversity is great, it is only fair to send a million middles easterners, Latin Americans and East Asians to Sub Saharan African. Sharing is caring!
http://newobserveronline.com/mass-invader-sex-attacks-in-stuttgart-hamburg/
what's that word for a slave raid - ragaza or something?
Ironically, Italy, which stupidly followed Germany into war for reasons of ‘national glory’, but only got national disgrace, suffered mass rape of literally thousands of Italian women by Moroccans in French employ.
The f*cking stupid Italians now import Moroccans by the million.
Germany f*cked them over then – they turned Italy into a battle ground, a prolonged, destructive, gut wrenching battle ground.
Now Germany is being, literally, f*cked over by some rather nasty, priapic Moroccans, and the current Fuhrerlein is protecting them.
I simply cannot get over the dumbness of white people. Or the evil of The Economist.
It’s the young single immigrant underclass men who just happen to be Muslim who are employing Roissy-esque techniques to get some trim.
Why? Muslims are born and raised in a patriarchal society—where some conservative whites desire a return those “glory” days—by which women are considered to be chattel, stupid.
Muslims and Christians are related in that way–keep women where they should be, right?
To paraphrase Roissy, why be a sucker at marriage and raising kids when you can suck out the lifeblood of being single and chasin’ skirts? And to paraphrase Jim at Jim’s blog, there is no such thing as marital rape.
Jefferson—“Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.”
Because they do not strictly practice Islam. It’s not an uncommon experience for single, out of work men to search for other ways to satiate their desires for masculinizing behavior, whether it be buying a truck, pumping iron, or aggressively gaming chicks. Again, it’s the Roissy lifestyle!
“These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.”
Corrected for accuracy —> These Muslim men are behaving like any member, regardless of race or ethnicity, of the criminal underclass.
German_reader—“Any serious country would round them up (and rough them up in the process) and deport them. Instead they’re allowed to stay for years, game the system and commit crimes with a (to a large degree justified) feeling of impunity.”
Can’t say I disagree.
Flinders Petrie—“Germany is now a virtual petri dish of intersecting systems of oppression and discrimination; a synergistic blending of sexism, Islamophobia, bigotry, homophobia, and racism.”
You forgot to add “white privilege” and “Zionism”. You must be new here.
Radical Centrist—“On one thing, almost all economists agree: In the long term, the refugee crisis ought to be unambiguously positive for the European economy. Over time, the new arrivals should play an important role in addressing Europe’s alarming demographic trends, improving the ratio of workers to those who are economically inactive, a ratio that is falling in many countries.”
How did Carnegie and Rockefeller and Gould and Frick fare with immigrants at their disposal? How the United States become a global economic power by 1900?
Big Bill—“Groups of young horny Puerto Rican men milling around in Central Park started groping girls and tearing their clothes off.”
Roissy would characterize this behavior as being alpha-eseque. You really need to get with the program.
I found part of this argument in Chesterton’s A Short History of England:
Chivalry might be called the baptism of Feudalism. It was an attempt to bring the justice and even the logic of the Catholic creed into a military system which already existed; to turn its discipline into an initiation and its inequalities into a hierarchy. To the comparative grace of the new period belongs, of course, that considerable cultus of the dignity of woman, to which the word “chivalry” is often narrowed, or perhaps exalted. This also was a revolt against one of the worst gaps in the more polished civilization of the Saracens. Moslems denied even souls to women; perhaps from the same instinct which recoiled from the sacred birth, with its inevitable glorification of the mother; perhaps merely because, having originally had tents rather than houses, they had slaves rather than housewives. It is false to say that the chivalric view of women was merely an affectation, except in the sense in which there must always be an affectation where there is an ideal. It is the worst sort of superficiality not to see the pressure of a general sentiment merely because it is always broken up by events; the Crusade itself, for example, is more present and potent as a dream even than as a reality. From the first Plantagenet to the last Lancastrian it haunts the minds of English kings, giving as a background to their battles a mirage of Palestine. So a devotion like that of Edward I. to his queen was quite a real motive in the lives of multitudes of his contemporaries. When crowds of enlightened tourists, setting forth to sneer at the superstitions of the continent, are taking tickets and labelling luggage at the large railway station at the west end of the Strand, I do not know whether they all speak to their wives with a more flowing courtesy than their fathers in Edward’s time, or whether they pause to meditate on the legend of a husband’s sorrow, to be found in the very name of Charing Cross.
Yours sincerely,
A. Sasquatch.
Jared Taylor believes that Black Lies Matter is a blessing in disguise in that the longer they exist to spew anti-White garbage, the more Right Wing Whites it creates in the process.
Any white who cannot see the ‘name of the game’ before all that ‘black lives matter’ crap, is simply to dumb to live.
Will feminists concern themselves with those German women who were actually raped and sexually assaulted? Or will the skin color and exotic origins of the male assaulters trump the victimhood status of white women?
Fascinating.
If only Haven Monahan were found within that vibrant flash mob. Just one Haven would be enough, really.
I’ve gone on and on enough about the sacred ‘totem pole’ and totem pole algorithms enough in this blog.
what the hell possessed her?
The need for approval from the media, from fellow politicians, from the people with whom she socializes at Davos and other meetings and conferences. And she got what she wanted – she’s Time’s person of the year.
Too bad for Germany he was elected by the College of Cardinals rather than by the German people.
Well, it IS a f*cking religion with those bastard adherents.
(Sorry to usurp ‘German Reader’ and for the foul language).
One is reminded of Air Chief Marshall Arthur Harris’s wartime statement against Germany’s leaders:
"For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind: it hath no stalk: the bud shall yield no meal: if so be it yield, the strangers shall swallow it up"
Consider the ubiquity and saturation availability of hard core pornography on smart phones and tablets – which even the most scurvy of these ‘migrants’ all seem to have.
San Fernando’s biggest industry, of course, features women, overwhelmingly white women, seemingly doing all sorts of unspeakable things at the merest ‘drop of a hat’ or should I say drop of a wad (cash of course).
Now, consider yer typical Magrehbi sex-starved, burka-teased, scurvy punter.
He’s just entered porn-hub paradise.
The only trouble is that real, rather than fabled, white tarts keep their drawers on.
It’s been said that she let in all the migrants in order to resist Turkey’s blackmail. But what she’s done to Europe is far worse than letting Turkey into the EU.
And why doesn’t Japan want Third World immigrants again?
It’s very unlikely genuine refugees would act like this and I think you’re aware of that.
Hilarious stuff:
So, books by White men from Latin America are OK? Which means that Borges is kosher?
And, since Eastern Europe went unmentioned, I suppose that writers like Gogol and Pushkin are also acceptable?
I’m not sure Germans spend much time commenting on American domestic politics.
Will feminists concern themselves with those German women who were actually raped and sexually assaulted? Or will the skin color and exotic origins of the male assaulters trump the victimhood status of white women?
Fascinating.
If only Haven Monahan were found within that vibrant flash mob. Just one Haven would be enough, really.
Rotherham showed that feminists would rather be raped by swarthy Muslims than be seen as racists.
The truth is that it was other women and girls who got raped, and feminists don't give a shit about other women, except their immediate family and close friends.
It takes my breath away every time I see the callous indifference of women to people outside their immediate circle. The feminist bleating is turned on only when there is the chance of extracting resources or power from their menfolk, or those of a higher social class. The perps in Rotherham had nothing the feminists wanted to take.
Pardon the pun, but no skin in the game for the feminists.
I’ve asked before, but isn’t there a German Deep State left? The old “von” families. Prussians? Or did the occupation destroy/subvert them all?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl_9ayxs69A
THE GOOD SHEPHERD
Joseph Palmi: Let me ask you something... we Italians, we got our families, and we got the church; the Irish, they have the homeland, Jews their tradition; even the n******, they got their music. What about you people, Mr. Wilson, what do you have?
Edward Wilson: The United States of America. The rest of you are just visiting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florian_Henckel_von_Donnersmarck
"Following the defeat of the Third Reich in 1945, the Henckel von Donnersmarcks lost their fortune due to expulsion from Silesia by Ukrainian troops of Soviet Army."
They may have lost their money, but not their amazing class!
Sorry Germany you’ll just need to get used to that pee smell."
Someone forgot to throw a big plastic furniture cover over Cologne.
“‘Angie is just a Crazy Cat Lady writ large. She’ll be there in her housecoat and slippers throwing cat kibble at them as long as they keep coming.
Sorry Germany you’ll just need to get used to that pee smell.’
Someone forgot to throw a big plastic furniture cover over Cologne.”
You’re too kind. Trapping feral cats and carting them off to a kill shelter is much more effective. Though I can see where Germany might find that method has troubling historical connotations.
All that is left is for these sexually frustrated young men to bring their Trashfeen Malik mail order brides in and they will be popping out little Jihadists by the dozen.
I also read this:
http://www.westfalen-blatt.de/OWL/Lokales/Kreis-Lippe/Detmold/2069675-13-jaehriges-Maedchen-aus-Asien-von-Landsmann-missbraucht-Verdaechtiger-in-U-Haft-Polizei-aeussert-sich-nach-Berichterstattung-Im-Fluechtlingsheim-vergewaltigt-Oeffentlichkeit-soll-nichts-erfahren
About the German police deliberately staying silent about the rape of a 13 year old girl in a Detmold refugee accommodation.
I’m shocked by all the ‘racist’ rhetoric here.
Why should the ‘refugees’ be denied their Victory Riot?
http://takimag.com/article/birth_of_the_victory_riot_steve_sailer/print#axzz3wOujL6kq
And we should be happy that Muslims, Arabs, and North Africans are becoming ‘westernized’ and acting like soccer hooligans. I mean they are even drinking alcohol and acting like UVA frat boy rape gang. They are taking lessons from Caveman Monahan.
They don’t heed the Koran. They heed this(the other Semites):
Sorry Germany you'll just need to get used to that pee smell.
She was a good enough leader for Germany for years but had a mental breakdown or episode that turned her into a dictatorial cat lady imposing her whims on the rest of Europe. My opinion.
Jared Taylor believes that Black Lies Matter is a blessing in disguise in that the longer they exist to spew anti-White garbage, the more Right Wing Whites it creates in the process.
BLM was definitely instrumental in my awakening.
Cologne cathedral, Berlin’s Brandenburg Gate and bridges across the river Rhine plunged into darkness in backlash against anti-immigrant protests
The above is from an article exactly one year ago today. It goes on:
In Cologne, where protesters were also heavily outnumbered, the floodlights were switched off at the immense cathedral that dominates the city skyline and is Germany’s most visited tourist attraction, and on the bridges across the river Rhine.
One year later? Everything is going as well as any reasonable person could’ve expected.
So how come the whole rest of the former Soviet Bloc has a much healther attitude to immigration etc than the west?
Including Merkel’s Ossi compatriots (who highlight the difference quite particularly when compared to west germans).
If anything Merkel is just being as ‘westerner’ as possible.
What's wrong with the West is not 'the Jews' which when very, very Jewish Samuel Goldwyn, Louis B. Mayer, and Jack Warner were running Hollywood had Yankee Doodle Dandy and John Wayne defeating the Japanese and the Apache. Rather it is decades of advertisers pandering to the WORST of female desires: hatred of beta White males (the origin of PC/Multikult and anti-Whitism) for lack of sexy dominance, excuse making for Alpha males, social competition for being most holy, herd mentality conformism, etc.
Women make or influence about 85% of consumer purchases, so advertisers just pander to their desires figuring that if they offend males well too bad, they're playing the numbers game. And that numbers game plays right into mass Third World immigration, and excuse making for mass rapes by the Cathedral while there is a female meltdown over a fat White guy engineer wearing a shirt with hula girls on it while helping land a probe on a comet. Or an engineer getting fired for making a dongle joke at a programming convention. Or a female meltdown over a nerd asking her for coffee in an elevator.
Look at what women don't do. Not whatever excuses they make. They never criticize Muslims and their primitive attitudes towards women.
Female driven mass consumerism and mass advertising are like steroids pushing society to ultra feminism. Women have less of a role and importance in Eastern lands because advertising is still so new and consumerism so unsteady. Switzerland is more of the same -- it had granted women the vote only in the 1970s, and had and still does hefty restrictions on advertising and mass marketing. As does Japan, with its deliberately maintained retail small holder inefficiencies and higher costs.
I am Polish and I hate to say it, but Poland had higher crime rate than old Europe decades ago before the immigration. While right now I would say it’s safer here overall, this is not an oasis – people get beaten (especially if they are dark-skinned, but perfectly European look won’t always save you) and robbed.
This is not a problem. The fact that government of my country (Poland) is trying to get rid of corrupted class which costs us billions of zlotys every years – that’s the real problem.
Sorry Germany you’ll just need to get used to that pee smell."
Someone forgot to throw a big plastic furniture cover over Cologne.
Not a bad idea—a giant burqa would impose much-needed modesty on every Western harlot in the city, all at once.
Where are the great headline writers of yesteryear?
Germany shocked, shocked by wild and crazy invaders!!!!
Sorry Germany you'll just need to get used to that pee smell.
Brings to mind this post regarding our Crazy Cat Ladies.
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/the-crazy-cat-lady-stage-of-america/
Puerto Rican Day parade was a grope-fest for many years and a disaster in other ways. Howard Stern used to go on about this each year like clockwork
Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.
" Most of the crimes reported to police were robberies."
Robbing women of their purses and wallets. These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.
These Arab Muslim men harassing and robbing White German women are the next Steve Jobs according to the Leftist invite the world elites.
Koran says nothing about drugs so Muslims feel they can go to town with them and not defy Allah. Many Jihadis are hopped up on Captagon.
Here’s how ISIS uses amphetamines to create brainwashed, psychotic killing-machines
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/12/heres-how-isis-uses-amphetamines-to-create-brainwashed-psychotic-killing-machines/
Any impressions on which group of Muslim men is the worst in terms of violence and perversion? Maghrebis, Levantines/Iraqis, or Pakistanis?
In a sort of “Being There” moment, I had been in Central Park shortly before both the Central Park jogger and the Puerto Rican Day parade incidents. In 1989, I had run across the Harlem cutoff (approx. 105th St.) perhaps an hour before the jogger’s assault. It was dusk, and runners never went above the cutoff with darkness approaching. In 2000, was bike-riding the 6-mile loop around the south end–near the S.E. corner where the PR Day parade assaults took place, minutes beforehand (having to detour up the Mall to Center Drive due to pedestrian congestion on the loop). There was indeed a very strange vibe about activity in the Park in both instances.
Well, look at the bright side of things. At least, they are showing signs of assimilating. You know the old adage: when in Germany, do as the Germans do.
Thirty years ago a friend (white American), who worked for Babcock & Wilcox installing steam-powered desalinization plants in Saudi Arabia, told of how on flights out of the country the pilot would announce clearance of SA airspace, passengers would dispose of their Arabian attire and the drinks cart would come out of locked storage. Hypocrisy writ large.
Jared Taylor believes that Black Lies Matter is a blessing in disguise in that the longer they exist to spew anti-White garbage, the more Right Wing Whites it creates in the process.
True that.
I’m convinced that BLM and Ferguson were why Republicans did surprisingly well in the last Congressional elections. Nobody openly discussed it, least of all leftist pundits, but BLM negatively influenced a lot of people.
BLM is also helping swell the TrumpTide. Wouldn’t surprise me if Trump is secretly funding them.
BLM just won’t stop. They keep charging headlong into the brick wall of reality over and over again — new video was just released showing Tamir Rice pulling a gun on a police officer before he was shot, and there will be six more trials of the Freddie Gray officers stretching into the summer.
Tamir might not have been the sharpest pencil in the drawer but what, even by ghetto logic, would the point be of pulling a toy gun on a cop?
Featuring German rapist Hänsel Monahan?
http://newobserveronline.com/mass-invader-sex-attacks-in-stuttgart-hamburg/
what's that word for a slave raid - ragaza or something?
“what’s that word for a slave raid – ragaza or something?”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razzia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghazi_(warrior)
A new people brings a “new type of crime.”
A new people creates a “completely new dimension of crime.”
I can understand Obama wanting to import lots of Latinos, Hatians, etc. as he can eventually count on most of them voting Democrat.
But can Merkel really think a bunch of angry Muslim men will ever vote for her party, the Christian Democrats? These mad dogs are not just bad for Germany, they are bad for her party. Dumb…
The socialist parties support it for the votes.
Europhiles support it for divide and rule.
Some support it because they want to see the destruction of the european peoples.
Times has picked it up.
The top “Reader’s Picks” comments on the NYT article are monolithic. My favorite:
Also:
The top “NYT Pick”, however (with a whopping 41 recommends!), is pro-refugee.
Wondering if any Clappers got the clap?
Immigration Halt!
One incident won’t change global perception, but as these incidents become more prevalent, patterns emerge that are obvious to even casual observers, the current “standard script” will be increasingly ridiculous and be discarded. Global perception is in constant change and the current “standard script” might seem invincible or it might be on its last legs.
Had we listened to those guys then, we might have been able to do something about it. Now the problem has only gotten worse and dead-enders of this failed ideology double down and try ignore what is happening. It's great more and more people are seeing the light. But each and every day more and more non-Europeans are streaming into Europe and North America.
At this rate we'll only get enough converts AFTER it is way too late to do anything about it.
So it seems there's been a switch in the interim where the media is talking about something while the social media is still being censored.
Maybe just a one-off cos this incident was too big to cover up or maybe something bigger.
Hopefully more and more Germans will wake up to the reality that their political elite doesn't care about public safety and security at all.
Zuckerberg expressed eagerness to censor any anti-immigrant/refugee sentiment. No one had to twist Facebook’s arm to get them to engage in political censorship.
As these incidents continue, cell phone video evidence will mount, the public is eager to see, many outlets will be eager to host and cover, and Facebook can’t stop them.
OT: Sicario is out on DVD, BluRay, and at Redbox today for those, like me, who missed it in theater.
The moral logic of this all.
European madness in WWII pushed Jews to Palestine, and Palestinians got ethnically cleansed and lost their homeland.
So now, the Arabs must pour into Europe and ethnically cleanse Germans who are losing their homeland.
Idiot.
The problem is how long do we have to wait until ‘they get it’? As others pointed out Enoch Powell was predicting this stuff almost fifty years ago, but they didn’t listen. Worse they not only didn’t listen, they censured him. Ditto for Pat Buchanan since around 1990.
Had we listened to those guys then, we might have been able to do something about it. Now the problem has only gotten worse and dead-enders of this failed ideology double down and try ignore what is happening. It’s great more and more people are seeing the light. But each and every day more and more non-Europeans are streaming into Europe and North America.
At this rate we’ll only get enough converts AFTER it is way too late to do anything about it.
She gave an all details interview to CBS News and the NYT a few months later. She still struggles with major health problems arising from the assault five years ago.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/lara-logan-breaks-silence-on-cairo-assault/
Apparently Logan was digitally raped, and the physical damage done to her reproductive organs was significant. It takes a sub-human to do that to a woman, and yet they are legion.
These attacks are nothing that a few well orchestrated Slut Walks won’t clear up.
But can Merkel really think a bunch of angry Muslim men will ever vote for her party, the Christian Democrats? These mad dogs are not just bad for Germany, they are bad for her party. Dumb...
Probably true, but the Christian Democrats have been trying outreach to immigrant groups for some time. At one point the Christian Democrats in North-Rhine-Westphalia (where Cologne is) actually had a problem with infiltration by Turkish-Germans who were members of the Grey wolves and similiar outfits and wanted to join German parties to further their agenda…
This must be Steve's version of a Triple Bank Shot (tm), because actually, no it does not make any sense at all.
Agree. Rape, like any other crime, can be used for political purposes (e.g., subjugation of a conquered people, terrorism), but it is not a political act in the sense that that loon Brownmiller intended. She probably spent too much time reading “Soul On Ice” in college.
There’s a very large element of narcissism in pro-Immigration attitudes. The idea is that all these millions of people from abroad are “just like us”. For the Scandinavians and Germans, with their well-run societies, this means they think everyone is civic-minded, hard-working, and well-behaved. The rougher and tougher areas of Europe have a more realistic attitude towards immigrants, because in many respects they share a similar mentality. That’s why eastern Europe has not opened its arms like Germany and Scandinavia.
San Fernando's biggest industry, of course, features women, overwhelmingly white women, seemingly doing all sorts of unspeakable things at the merest 'drop of a hat' or should I say drop of a wad (cash of course).
Now, consider yer typical Magrehbi sex-starved, burka-teased, scurvy punter.
He's just entered porn-hub paradise.
The only trouble is that real, rather than fabled, white tarts keep their drawers on.
I have no doubt that a lot of those 3rd world migrants have access to hard porn on their smartphones, but even those with IQs lower than 80 would be aware that its not a true reflection of reality.
What is really driving them to do this is the other stuff they can access on their smartphones, stories about how in Europe you face no real punishment for crimes committed, stories about how the government generally uses its police to protect migrants over the locals and stories about how wimpish the men are in protecting their women. Unlike the porn, these views of Europe are very real and the migrants know it and they know that nobody will really stand in their way. These views are not coming on obscure sites, a migrant viewing something like BBC or any other standard mainstream outlet or the standard PC speak from a politician will very quickly realize just how easy it is for them to get away with things.
One might as well ask “what happened to the old WASP elite, the American-Americans?”:
THE GOOD SHEPHERD
Joseph Palmi: Let me ask you something… we Italians, we got our families, and we got the church; the Irish, they have the homeland, Jews their tradition; even the n******, they got their music. What about you people, Mr. Wilson, what do you have?
Edward Wilson: The United States of America. The rest of you are just visiting.
There are lots and lots of stupid white people on this planet. With a few very intelligent ones.
Of all the things to be upset with the Nazis for – and there are many – foremost is that they made it impossible to think and talk clearly about race and culture and genetics.
Unless the causative factors behind this PC lunacy are clearly explained, it’ll be impossible to effectively counter it. Here is my attempt to do so.
As I see it, the West is suffering from a condition I’ll call empathobesity.
For a long time, an egalitarian, empathetic impulse was an asset in the West as it created an ever expanding educated and productive class of citizens by expanding political franchise from monarchs to lords to wealthy commoners to middle class men to all men to all adults, followed by welfare and universal healthcare etc.
To illustrate using the example of England, starting with the Magna Carta in 1215, we have the English civil war in 1642, the glorious revolution in 1688, Habeas Corpus, the reform acts of the 19th century, the representation of the people acts of the early 20th, feminism, Welfare, the sexual revolution, mass migration, gay rights, animal rights, transgender rights and so on.
Initially these steps have had a positive payoff as they expanded the class of educated people able to undertake scientific and industrial progress. This is why the scientific and industrial revolutions occurred in England where also we see the first diffusion of political power with the Magna Carta in 1215.
Over time, this empathetic, egalitarianist impulse has calcified into a dogma. Probably in the early to mid 20th century, this dogma has run into diminishing and even negative returns.
Thus, the extension of empathy to adherents of a hostile religion is likely to be a major drag, not gain, a point well proven by this incident. The mass importation of low skilled illegal immigrants will not enhance the economic welfare of the recipient nation.
The feminist movement initially increased the pool of educated workers, but by eschewing reproduction, have condemned the West to declining human and financial resources just as the mass of poorly educated and integrated aliens, especially in Europe, starts to spike.
Yet, like an obese person compelled by instinct to eat in excess, the West cannot shake off its pathological empathy (hence empathobesity).
I’ve made this argument in more detail at tarkmarg.blogspot.com. Please have a look and see if you find it convincing.
The result is the current PC religion based on and driven by a completely falsified set of data.
I also believe that NW Europeans evolved to favor certain traits - empathy and non-tribalism in particular - from around 1000 to, well, quite recently. I think that this allowed them to work together on a scale that tribal societies simply couldn't match. You combine that ability to work in very large organizations with the technological advances of Europe over that time, and you get one kick-ass force.
Starting around 1500, this potent combination hit on a global scale. NW Europeans ran rough shod over the Earth for nearly 500 years. What a run. However, the moral underpinnings started to erode as the Enlightenment moved toward natural rights and universal rights. That slow moral decline was vastly accelerated with the Great White Civil War (WWI and WWII), which made many white intellectuals question their society and people.
So, you have whites already faltering when technology allows for mass communication and easy travel. Our biological evolution and moral code (universal rights) left (and leave) us wide open to being inundated by the the Third World hordes. The vast majority of whites simply have no psychological defense, especially when our media and academia is controlled by a combination of a bitter outside tribe and the most empathetic of whites.
As the Derb says, We are doomed!
However, I have to believe that some white will make it through all of this. Of course, those whites will be different, far less empathetic and much more tribal. Evolution at work.
This must be Steve's version of a Triple Bank Shot (tm), because actually, no it does not make any sense at all.
It doesn’t get more political than an invading force taking a country’s women at will. Triple bank shot my ass, that’s a brutal slam dunk. What planet are you on?
I was in the train in Europe end of August on my way to go clubbing and ride the cock carousel.
And there were these three girls…natural blondes…already somewhat drunk sitting in the middle of the train car in front of me.
Over the next ten minutes I watched as every black and Arab 20something/teen male came and surrounded those 3 girls.
It was like watching a pack of hyenas. It was insane and I kept looking at all the people in my train car like “ARE YOU GUYS WATCHING THIS?” and those IDIOTS were totally in the dark over what was going on in the train car in front of us.
When I got off, those girls were surrounded by at least a dozen men on the low count. With one Arab male sitting directly beside the girls and another Arab male draped over the seat staring at them.
My question is how did all these black/muslims coordinate their movement around the train as they came from both sides and at different times over the course of a 15-30 minute train ride?
What else did I see…
I just would walk in the woods occasionally and walk past a Black Black guy who didn’t look like he belonged in the woods. Stuff like that.
On Sundays though when all the white people were at home…the only people who would be walking around the closed shops would be Muslims. That was troubling.
Oh another story…
I was at a train station trying to start conversations with random men to practice my Game…when…
Some black chick…in a Multicultural group of Hispanic/Asian/Black (ahahah Asians aren’t your friends people!) was drunk and screaming in the language something along the lines of ‘You guys think you are an Elite Species!!’ to some teenage white kid
Every white woman, old and young on that train platform stood behind that white kid in solidarity.
I was impressed by my fellow blue eyed females.
Appreciate your comment. All of it. I'm 63 and married 35 years, so can't join the carousel. But nice to read your comment.
Typical rapes (especially those involving acquaintances) aren’t generally political crimes. But interethnic stranger rape, especially when committed by gangs, often is.
Back in the 1960s, Black Panther Eldridge Cleaver famously justified his rapes of white women as “an insurrectionary act”. I don’t remember if Brownmiller specifically mentioned this, but she probably had it and other similar incidents in mind when she defined rape as a political crime. Of course, to focus too strongly on the role of African-Americans in rape would have resulted in banishment from polite society, so it was easier for Brownmiller and her followers to pretend that all the rapes were being done by powerful white men motivated by white male privilege.
More broadly, we know that almost every documented military invasion in history has been accompanied by large numbers of sexual assaults by the victorious soldiers against the conquered civilian population. The modern West has tried (not always successfully) to stop this, but virtually every other society in history took it for granted and considered it a part of the spoils of war. It doesn’t take much of a stretch to interpret these assaults as political acts, at least in part.
“She probably spent too much time reading “Soul On Ice” in college.”
Brownmiller told People magazine in 1975 that the Left glorifying black-on-white rape via “Soul on Ice” was a contributor to the rape problem that had gotten worse over the previous decade.
Brownmiller deserves a reassessment. A lot of what she was responding to was the big increase in violent crime, including rape, in the 1960s and 1970s and a fair amount of her advice was practical to prevent women from becoming crime victims: e.g., get a heavy chain on your door, don’t open it to strange men knocking on your door, etc.
disproportionately young male at first and concentrated in certain areas at a time leading to...
- violent competition over females
- gang violence
- sexual violence
- forced prostitution
Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.
" Most of the crimes reported to police were robberies."
Robbing women of their purses and wallets. These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.
These Arab Muslim men harassing and robbing White German women are the next Steve Jobs according to the Leftist invite the world elites.
Muslims tend to use alcohol, tobacco and drugs. It is fairly easy to find in all Muslim countries. A handful of Muslim countries (Saudi Arabia and Iran) have a total ban. Iran allow non-Muslims (under certain conditions) to use alcohol for private consumptions and religious rites. However, it is very easy to find alcohol and drugs in Iran and Saudi Arabia tend to look the other way if it’s consumed in private.
We are often told by MSM that Muslims are modest, conservative and do not drink. The truth is that they have no higher morals than westerners when it comes to cheating, drinking, using drugs and act outrageously. Muslim women tend to be more conservative wearing a veil – often it depends on which country she comes from and what social statues she has. European Muslim women from Albania and former Yugoslavia tend not wear a veil. Muslims are in general from third world countries and they bring the same problem as non-Muslim from third world countries. A growing concern is Albanian (Muslim) prostitutes – working in Vienna, Berlin, Amsterdam and Rome.
It is a growing concern in Europe with Muslim men seeing non-veiled women as prostitutes. Among Muslims a veiled woman is a protected woman and so she cannot be touched. As most Muslim migrants are men there is an acute shortage of Muslim women and their difficulty to find employment make it difficult to them to find a wife. Indigenous white women are therefore often sexual targets. In many these women are young, naïve and do not understand that these Muslim men do not understand western social codes.
It does not make it easier than the liberal elites of Western Europe encourage unreasonable behaviour among migrant groups and tell them that their white indigenous people of Europe are “racists” and therefore a morally legit target. Here in Untied States police is actually there to protect citizens from criminals and not to spree “peace, love and understanding”. US police enjoy very much respect among the general population although most people are rightfully critical of them when they use too much force. The far-left and the ghastly ignorant liberals in Washington DC seem to hate them and try to make them just as weak as the police in Europe. Trump is sort of a mainstream candidate in United States and his first Ad looks like this;
Europe is just too far-out to the left and I think will backfire and allow the violent far-right to grow rapidly which will hurt innocent Muslims.
Had we listened to those guys then, we might have been able to do something about it. Now the problem has only gotten worse and dead-enders of this failed ideology double down and try ignore what is happening. It's great more and more people are seeing the light. But each and every day more and more non-Europeans are streaming into Europe and North America.
At this rate we'll only get enough converts AFTER it is way too late to do anything about it.
Have enough kids. As long as there’s a demographic population still alive and surviving they can reorganize and rebuild and it’s not too late. Germans may be pushed out of Germany but as long as there are enough still alive to group together, they can establish somewhere.
Back in the 1960s, Black Panther Eldridge Cleaver famously justified his rapes of white women as "an insurrectionary act". I don't remember if Brownmiller specifically mentioned this, but she probably had it and other similar incidents in mind when she defined rape as a political crime. Of course, to focus too strongly on the role of African-Americans in rape would have resulted in banishment from polite society, so it was easier for Brownmiller and her followers to pretend that all the rapes were being done by powerful white men motivated by white male privilege.
More broadly, we know that almost every documented military invasion in history has been accompanied by large numbers of sexual assaults by the victorious soldiers against the conquered civilian population. The modern West has tried (not always successfully) to stop this, but virtually every other society in history took it for granted and considered it a part of the spoils of war. It doesn't take much of a stretch to interpret these assaults as political acts, at least in part.
Here’s an excerpt from an interview Susan Brownmiller gave People magazine in 1975:
Q. What were some of your major misconceptions?
A. “Those of anyone growing up in the liberal New York City milieu. To me, rape was a screaming vindictive white woman and a framed black man. I had no sympathy or identification with rape victims. It was all the fault of women who led men on.
Q. What do statistics show?
A. “That most rape is black on black, that it is basically an intraclass, intraracial crime because of opportunity. But there is a definite rise in the percentage of interracial rape. ”
Q. Why is it increasing?
A. “It’s part and parcel of increasing violence rather than sex, partly because the criminal population is rising and becoming more adventurous. I think writers like Eldridge Cleaver and Franz Fanon, who tried to give rape an ideological justification, didn’t help. They tried to justify interracial rape as some sort of political act. It’s typical of the left to make a convicted rapist a hero.”
http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20065841,00.html
The media won't report it because it messes up their anti-white narrative.
So it wasn't about sex. Some enterprising journalist really should wallraff the immigrant sub-cultures to help us figure out what's going on.
Very perceptive from 40 years ago. I would call this a refreshingly accurate honest feminist perspective on rape. Today's feminists are deranged monsters compared to Susan Brownmiller
The female mayor of Cologne is going to announce new rules of behaviour for women, so this type of incident doesn’t repeat.
http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article150662120/Oberbuergermeisterin-legt-Frauen-Verhaltensregeln-nahe.html#disqus_thread
Youtube has a few good videos of combat in Cologne during March of 1945. I’ve linked to one video of an American M-26 Pershing tank dueling with a German Panther tank in the vicinity of the Cathedral.
Why? Muslims are born and raised in a patriarchal society—where some conservative whites desire a return those “glory” days—by which women are considered to be chattel, stupid.
Muslims and Christians are related in that way--keep women where they should be, right?
To paraphrase Roissy, why be a sucker at marriage and raising kids when you can suck out the lifeblood of being single and chasin’ skirts? And to paraphrase Jim at Jim’s blog, there is no such thing as marital rape.
Jefferson—“Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.”
Because they do not strictly practice Islam. It’s not an uncommon experience for single, out of work men to search for other ways to satiate their desires for masculinizing behavior, whether it be buying a truck, pumping iron, or aggressively gaming chicks. Again, it’s the Roissy lifestyle!
“These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.”
Corrected for accuracy —> These Muslim men are behaving like any member, regardless of race or ethnicity, of the criminal underclass.
German_reader—“Any serious country would round them up (and rough them up in the process) and deport them. Instead they’re allowed to stay for years, game the system and commit crimes with a (to a large degree justified) feeling of impunity.”
Can’t say I disagree.
Flinders Petrie—“Germany is now a virtual petri dish of intersecting systems of oppression and discrimination; a synergistic blending of sexism, Islamophobia, bigotry, homophobia, and racism.”
You forgot to add “white privilege” and “Zionism”. You must be new here.
Radical Centrist—“On one thing, almost all economists agree: In the long term, the refugee crisis ought to be unambiguously positive for the European economy. Over time, the new arrivals should play an important role in addressing Europe’s alarming demographic trends, improving the ratio of workers to those who are economically inactive, a ratio that is falling in many countries.”
How did Carnegie and Rockefeller and Gould and Frick fare with immigrants at their disposal? How the United States become a global economic power by 1900?
Big Bill—“Groups of young horny Puerto Rican men milling around in Central Park started groping girls and tearing their clothes off.”
Roissy would characterize this behavior as being alpha-eseque. You really need to get with the program.
English writer G.K. Chesterton believed that the rise of chivalry, starting in the early Middle Ages, came with the veneration of the Virgin Mary. The protection of women, motherhood and the veneration of the Virgin Mary go hand-in-hand. The rise of chivalry spurred the rise of Western civilization itself, which fought against barbarians who didn’t have the same respect for women.
I found part of this argument in Chesterton’s A Short History of England:
Chivalry might be called the baptism of Feudalism. It was an attempt to bring the justice and even the logic of the Catholic creed into a military system which already existed; to turn its discipline into an initiation and its inequalities into a hierarchy. To the comparative grace of the new period belongs, of course, that considerable cultus of the dignity of woman, to which the word “chivalry” is often narrowed, or perhaps exalted. This also was a revolt against one of the worst gaps in the more polished civilization of the Saracens. Moslems denied even souls to women; perhaps from the same instinct which recoiled from the sacred birth, with its inevitable glorification of the mother; perhaps merely because, having originally had tents rather than houses, they had slaves rather than housewives. It is false to say that the chivalric view of women was merely an affectation, except in the sense in which there must always be an affectation where there is an ideal. It is the worst sort of superficiality not to see the pressure of a general sentiment merely because it is always broken up by events; the Crusade itself, for example, is more present and potent as a dream even than as a reality. From the first Plantagenet to the last Lancastrian it haunts the minds of English kings, giving as a background to their battles a mirage of Palestine. So a devotion like that of Edward I. to his queen was quite a real motive in the lives of multitudes of his contemporaries. When crowds of enlightened tourists, setting forth to sneer at the superstitions of the continent, are taking tickets and labelling luggage at the large railway station at the west end of the Strand, I do not know whether they all speak to their wives with a more flowing courtesy than their fathers in Edward’s time, or whether they pause to meditate on the legend of a husband’s sorrow, to be found in the very name of Charing Cross.
You're going to have to be clearer as far as who are these "barbarians" and how you define "respect for women". Vikings, for example, were considered barbaric, I suppose, but the menfolk granted their women tremendous freedom compared to other European societies of that era. Women managed the finances of the family, ran the farm in their husband's absence. If widowed, they (gasp) could own land and control wealth. Would these actions from your point of view be "disrespectful"?
Regarding chivalry, historian Jean Charles Leonard de Sismondi responds, "The more closely we look into history, the more clearly shall we perceive that the system of chivalry is an invention almost entirely poetical. It is impossible to distinguish the countries in which it is said to have prevailed. It is always represented as distant from us both in time and place, and whilst the contemporary historians give us a clear, detailed, and complete account of the vices of the court and the great, of the ferocity or corruption of the nobles, and of the servility of the people, we are astonished to find the poets, after a long lapse of time, adorning the very same ages with the most splendid fictions of grace, virtue, and loyalty. The Romance writers of the twelfth century placed the age of chivalry in the time of Charlemagne. The period when these writers existed, is the time pointed out by Francis I. At the present day [about 1810], we imagine we can still see chivalry flourishing in the persons of Du Guesclin and Bayard, under Charles V and Francis I. But when we come to examine either the one period or the other, although we find in each some heroic spirits, we are forced to confess that it is necessary to antedate the age of chivalry, at least three or four centuries before any period of authentic history."
I also question whether European "chivalry" entailed men jackbooting the children of their sworn enemies, most notably during the Crusades and during the Age of Exploration.
The f*cking stupid Italians now import Moroccans by the million.
Germany f*cked them over then - they turned Italy into a battle ground, a prolonged, destructive, gut wrenching battle ground.
Now Germany is being, literally, f*cked over by some rather nasty, priapic Moroccans, and the current Fuhrerlein is protecting them.
I simply cannot get over the dumbness of white people. Or the evil of The Economist.
Yes – see the Academy Award winning film Two Women starring Sophia Loren
NEWSFLASH– It wasn’t just Cologne.
I spent New Year’s eve in Munich with my two (blonde, American) college age daughters. We found a place away from the center for a late dinner and about 11:30 the three of us started making our way to the main square, Marienplatz, to witness the celebration. As we got closer, the volume of fireworks going off increased dramatically (earlier in the day, I noticed in a supermarket a large food case filled with all manner of rockets and firecrackers for sale).The street leading into Marienplatz became increasingly clogged with people, some setting off fireworks, others watching. In the spirit of adventure, we decided to brave the crowds and shoulder through into the square, especially as our hotel lay on the opposite side.
Once fully in the square, I noticed that there were very few Germans there. Those that were remained on the periphery, watching. Instead, the entire square was filled with thousands of what were obviously young Middle Eastern males. I don’t know where they all materialized from as they were very little in evidence on the city streets in the days preceding, nor were they visible at the Christmas markets.
It was absolute pandemonium in the square with rockets going off in all directions, bouncing off buildings, caroming off the pavement. A couple of guys were holding their faces where they had been hit by ordnance. It seemed too late to turn back once we were inside, so we clung to the edge of the square and shouldered and elbowed our way through, dodging explosives all the way.
Almost immediately, both my daughters complained of being groped by unseen hands. It was so crowded, it was impossible for me to see anyone specifically doing anything, especially as I was concentrating on just getting us through without being hit by a rocket (although one guy–looked Kazhaki– did approach me and asked my permission to kiss my daughter!). After that, I took the hand of my younger daughter, pulling her along, bulldozing through. The other one was a bit ahead. By the time we got to the other side and found a small space to pause, both girls told me they had been grabbed and groped numerous times. Butt and breasts grabbed, hair pulled, rude comments… it was an unrestrained testosterone gauntlet. I couldn’t say whether many of these swarthy Mideast miscreants were drunk (after all they are Muslim), but a few obviously were. This was really unexpected.
I saw no police presence in the square at all, but that could have been because a terrorist bomb threat had just come in and they were in the process of closing Munich’s main train station (and one other). I suspect similarly unpleasant situations occurred in the crowded squares of many German (and probably Swedish) cities on December 31 that went unreported.
Incidentally, I am now in Berlin and you would never know they have an immigrant problem in Germany. Ethnically, it’s as homogenous here as small town America circa 1957. That’s why so many Germans are in denial or supportive of Merkel’s welcome policy. They have not been affected in the least. Not yet.
I found part of this argument in Chesterton’s A Short History of England:
Chivalry might be called the baptism of Feudalism. It was an attempt to bring the justice and even the logic of the Catholic creed into a military system which already existed; to turn its discipline into an initiation and its inequalities into a hierarchy. To the comparative grace of the new period belongs, of course, that considerable cultus of the dignity of woman, to which the word “chivalry” is often narrowed, or perhaps exalted. This also was a revolt against one of the worst gaps in the more polished civilization of the Saracens. Moslems denied even souls to women; perhaps from the same instinct which recoiled from the sacred birth, with its inevitable glorification of the mother; perhaps merely because, having originally had tents rather than houses, they had slaves rather than housewives. It is false to say that the chivalric view of women was merely an affectation, except in the sense in which there must always be an affectation where there is an ideal. It is the worst sort of superficiality not to see the pressure of a general sentiment merely because it is always broken up by events; the Crusade itself, for example, is more present and potent as a dream even than as a reality. From the first Plantagenet to the last Lancastrian it haunts the minds of English kings, giving as a background to their battles a mirage of Palestine. So a devotion like that of Edward I. to his queen was quite a real motive in the lives of multitudes of his contemporaries. When crowds of enlightened tourists, setting forth to sneer at the superstitions of the continent, are taking tickets and labelling luggage at the large railway station at the west end of the Strand, I do not know whether they all speak to their wives with a more flowing courtesy than their fathers in Edward’s time, or whether they pause to meditate on the legend of a husband’s sorrow, to be found in the very name of Charing Cross.
The great art critic Lord Kenneth Clark saw the same thing as Chesterton. After 1000 AD, Europeans started making large numbers of sculptures and paintings of the Virgin Mary. The rise in regard for Mary was a key aspect of the shift from the Dark Ages to the Middle Ages.
One of several aspects working in concert. The rise of towns and trade, a rapid rise in population, the development of merchant and craft guilds, and the power of the bourgeoisie. Things we learned in World History.
Rotherham showed that feminists would rather be raped by swarthy Muslims than be seen as racists.
The truth is that it was other women and girls who got raped, and feminists don’t give a shit about other women, except their immediate family and close friends.
It takes my breath away every time I see the callous indifference of women to people outside their immediate circle. The feminist bleating is turned on only when there is the chance of extracting resources or power from their menfolk, or those of a higher social class. The perps in Rotherham had nothing the feminists wanted to take.
merkel was a communist party member as a youth.
This is just a continuation of the NKVD ordered rape of german women after the fall of berlin.
The f*cking stupid Italians now import Moroccans by the million.
Germany f*cked them over then - they turned Italy into a battle ground, a prolonged, destructive, gut wrenching battle ground.
Now Germany is being, literally, f*cked over by some rather nasty, priapic Moroccans, and the current Fuhrerlein is protecting them.
I simply cannot get over the dumbness of white people. Or the evil of The Economist.
Aren’t the Rothchild banks part owner?
Remember, these women aren’t getting raped. They’re getting Merkelled.
Why? Muslims are born and raised in a patriarchal society—where some conservative whites desire a return those “glory” days—by which women are considered to be chattel, stupid.
Muslims and Christians are related in that way--keep women where they should be, right?
To paraphrase Roissy, why be a sucker at marriage and raising kids when you can suck out the lifeblood of being single and chasin’ skirts? And to paraphrase Jim at Jim’s blog, there is no such thing as marital rape.
Jefferson—“Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.”
Because they do not strictly practice Islam. It’s not an uncommon experience for single, out of work men to search for other ways to satiate their desires for masculinizing behavior, whether it be buying a truck, pumping iron, or aggressively gaming chicks. Again, it’s the Roissy lifestyle!
“These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.”
Corrected for accuracy —> These Muslim men are behaving like any member, regardless of race or ethnicity, of the criminal underclass.
German_reader—“Any serious country would round them up (and rough them up in the process) and deport them. Instead they’re allowed to stay for years, game the system and commit crimes with a (to a large degree justified) feeling of impunity.”
Can’t say I disagree.
Flinders Petrie—“Germany is now a virtual petri dish of intersecting systems of oppression and discrimination; a synergistic blending of sexism, Islamophobia, bigotry, homophobia, and racism.”
You forgot to add “white privilege” and “Zionism”. You must be new here.
Radical Centrist—“On one thing, almost all economists agree: In the long term, the refugee crisis ought to be unambiguously positive for the European economy. Over time, the new arrivals should play an important role in addressing Europe’s alarming demographic trends, improving the ratio of workers to those who are economically inactive, a ratio that is falling in many countries.”
How did Carnegie and Rockefeller and Gould and Frick fare with immigrants at their disposal? How the United States become a global economic power by 1900?
Big Bill—“Groups of young horny Puerto Rican men milling around in Central Park started groping girls and tearing their clothes off.”
Roissy would characterize this behavior as being alpha-eseque. You really need to get with the program.
You’ve got a Jan Brady thing happening here. Do you go to Chateau Heartiste to tell the world what Sailer says and thinks?
Link please.
Tamir might not have been the sharpest pencil in the drawer but what, even by ghetto logic, would the point be of pulling a toy gun on a cop?
The f*cking stupid Italians now import Moroccans by the million.
Germany f*cked them over then - they turned Italy into a battle ground, a prolonged, destructive, gut wrenching battle ground.
Now Germany is being, literally, f*cked over by some rather nasty, priapic Moroccans, and the current Fuhrerlein is protecting them.
I simply cannot get over the dumbness of white people. Or the evil of The Economist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marocchinate
European madness in WWII pushed Jews to Palestine, and Palestinians got ethnically cleansed and lost their homeland.
So now, the Arabs must pour into Europe and ethnically cleanse Germans who are losing their homeland.
Fair enough, except that very few of the Arabs pouring into Europe are refugees. The troublemakers in Cologne weren’t even refugees – they were N. Africans.
In several german cities a large group of North African men have made problems with very brutal robbing and stealing, as well as drug dealing, they are almost exclusively refugees. It is much likely that those did the groping in New Years Night were connected to them.
Also alle of those who were checked that night in Cologne were refugees, according to a police officer who was there.
Nobody can know this for sure right now, but its much likely that only a few of those thousand men in Cologne that night were NOT refugees.
European madness in WWII pushed Jews to Palestine, and Palestinians got ethnically cleansed and lost their homeland.
So now, the Arabs must pour into Europe and ethnically cleanse Germans who are losing their homeland.
The Palestinians are still there. They are not Moroccans, Algerians, Pakistanis, etc. Do you know numbers? Can you read a map?
Idiot.
I spent New Year's eve in Munich with my two (blonde, American) college age daughters. We found a place away from the center for a late dinner and about 11:30 the three of us started making our way to the main square, Marienplatz, to witness the celebration. As we got closer, the volume of fireworks going off increased dramatically (earlier in the day, I noticed in a supermarket a large food case filled with all manner of rockets and firecrackers for sale).The street leading into Marienplatz became increasingly clogged with people, some setting off fireworks, others watching. In the spirit of adventure, we decided to brave the crowds and shoulder through into the square, especially as our hotel lay on the opposite side.
Once fully in the square, I noticed that there were very few Germans there. Those that were remained on the periphery, watching. Instead, the entire square was filled with thousands of what were obviously young Middle Eastern males. I don't know where they all materialized from as they were very little in evidence on the city streets in the days preceding, nor were they visible at the Christmas markets.
It was absolute pandemonium in the square with rockets going off in all directions, bouncing off buildings, caroming off the pavement. A couple of guys were holding their faces where they had been hit by ordnance. It seemed too late to turn back once we were inside, so we clung to the edge of the square and shouldered and elbowed our way through, dodging explosives all the way.
Almost immediately, both my daughters complained of being groped by unseen hands. It was so crowded, it was impossible for me to see anyone specifically doing anything, especially as I was concentrating on just getting us through without being hit by a rocket (although one guy--looked Kazhaki-- did approach me and asked my permission to kiss my daughter!). After that, I took the hand of my younger daughter, pulling her along, bulldozing through. The other one was a bit ahead. By the time we got to the other side and found a small space to pause, both girls told me they had been grabbed and groped numerous times. Butt and breasts grabbed, hair pulled, rude comments... it was an unrestrained testosterone gauntlet. I couldn't say whether many of these swarthy Mideast miscreants were drunk (after all they are Muslim), but a few obviously were. This was really unexpected.
I saw no police presence in the square at all, but that could have been because a terrorist bomb threat had just come in and they were in the process of closing Munich's main train station (and one other). I suspect similarly unpleasant situations occurred in the crowded squares of many German (and probably Swedish) cities on December 31 that went unreported.
Incidentally, I am now in Berlin and you would never know they have an immigrant problem in Germany. Ethnically, it's as homogenous here as small town America circa 1957. That's why so many Germans are in denial or supportive of Merkel's welcome policy. They have not been affected in the least. Not yet.
If refugees start demanding that gun control laws in Germany be eased so prevent discrimination against their vibrant custom of firing AK-47s in the air to celebrate, the NYT editorial board’s collective brain will melt.
No. Rotherham showed that feminists would rather that poor white girls, i.e. not the feminists or, in the rare case, their daughters, be raped by swarthy Muslims than the feminists be seen as racists.
Pardon the pun, but no skin in the game for the feminists.
Cruz is now attacking Trump on immigration….from the right!
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/ted-cruz-trump-will-let-deported-immigrants-back-in-i-wont#.qobB7nGR1
I spent New Year's eve in Munich with my two (blonde, American) college age daughters. We found a place away from the center for a late dinner and about 11:30 the three of us started making our way to the main square, Marienplatz, to witness the celebration. As we got closer, the volume of fireworks going off increased dramatically (earlier in the day, I noticed in a supermarket a large food case filled with all manner of rockets and firecrackers for sale).The street leading into Marienplatz became increasingly clogged with people, some setting off fireworks, others watching. In the spirit of adventure, we decided to brave the crowds and shoulder through into the square, especially as our hotel lay on the opposite side.
Once fully in the square, I noticed that there were very few Germans there. Those that were remained on the periphery, watching. Instead, the entire square was filled with thousands of what were obviously young Middle Eastern males. I don't know where they all materialized from as they were very little in evidence on the city streets in the days preceding, nor were they visible at the Christmas markets.
It was absolute pandemonium in the square with rockets going off in all directions, bouncing off buildings, caroming off the pavement. A couple of guys were holding their faces where they had been hit by ordnance. It seemed too late to turn back once we were inside, so we clung to the edge of the square and shouldered and elbowed our way through, dodging explosives all the way.
Almost immediately, both my daughters complained of being groped by unseen hands. It was so crowded, it was impossible for me to see anyone specifically doing anything, especially as I was concentrating on just getting us through without being hit by a rocket (although one guy--looked Kazhaki-- did approach me and asked my permission to kiss my daughter!). After that, I took the hand of my younger daughter, pulling her along, bulldozing through. The other one was a bit ahead. By the time we got to the other side and found a small space to pause, both girls told me they had been grabbed and groped numerous times. Butt and breasts grabbed, hair pulled, rude comments... it was an unrestrained testosterone gauntlet. I couldn't say whether many of these swarthy Mideast miscreants were drunk (after all they are Muslim), but a few obviously were. This was really unexpected.
I saw no police presence in the square at all, but that could have been because a terrorist bomb threat had just come in and they were in the process of closing Munich's main train station (and one other). I suspect similarly unpleasant situations occurred in the crowded squares of many German (and probably Swedish) cities on December 31 that went unreported.
Incidentally, I am now in Berlin and you would never know they have an immigrant problem in Germany. Ethnically, it's as homogenous here as small town America circa 1957. That's why so many Germans are in denial or supportive of Merkel's welcome policy. They have not been affected in the least. Not yet.
Check out Kreuzberg or Moabit. Plenty of Turks in those parts.
Mayor of Cologne says women should have code of conduct to prevent future assault
The suggested code of conduct includes maintaining an arm’s length distance from strangers, to stick within your own group, to ask bystanders for help or to intervene as a witness, or to inform the police if you are the victim of such an assault.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/mayor-of-cologne-says-women-should-have-code-of-conduct-to-prevent-future-assault-a6798186.html
Victims speak out after nightmare New Year in Cologne5
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=76f_1452034893
* Wear a burqa or at least a niqab at all times in public.
* Travel only in the company of your husband or a male blood relative over 15 years old.
* Do not go out between the hours of 7pm and 7am.
* Do not drive an automobile. Also, to ride a bicycle is unsafe as well as forbidden, and tends to incite the uncontrollable lust of men who see you.
* Remember, you are responsible for the behavior of strange men. If you lose your virtue or even become pregnant due to rape, you will be stoned to death for the crime of unchastity.
* Obey all orders of the mutawa. Do not interfere or even tarry if you see them enforcing sharia against women who do not follow the Code of Conduct.
"let's you and him fight"
Ask away, strong independent women who don't need no steenkin' man. I won't be going to jail for assaulting or otherwise offending a member of the Protected Classes.
That adds another layer to Francois’s pilgrimage to the Black Madonna in Submission.
@JHoLo,
Appreciate your comment. All of it. I’m 63 and married 35 years, so can’t join the carousel. But nice to read your comment.
Steven – this “dozens of women were merkelled” meme idea is pure gold. I vote you push it hard.
Has there been anybody doing a study of Slavic vs German IQ differences?
Bomber Harris was quoting Hosea 8:7.
“For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind: it hath no stalk: the bud shall yield no meal: if so be it yield, the strangers shall swallow it up”
The suggested code of conduct includes maintaining an arm’s length distance from strangers, to stick within your own group, to ask bystanders for help or to intervene as a witness, or to inform the police if you are the victim of such an assault.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/mayor-of-cologne-says-women-should-have-code-of-conduct-to-prevent-future-assault-a6798186.html
Victims speak out after nightmare New Year in Cologne5
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=76f_1452034893
In addition to keeping an arm’s length distance from strangers, etc, etc, the next edition of the Code of Conduct For The Women of Cologne will include:
* Wear a burqa or at least a niqab at all times in public.
* Travel only in the company of your husband or a male blood relative over 15 years old.
* Do not go out between the hours of 7pm and 7am.
* Do not drive an automobile. Also, to ride a bicycle is unsafe as well as forbidden, and tends to incite the uncontrollable lust of men who see you.
* Remember, you are responsible for the behavior of strange men. If you lose your virtue or even become pregnant due to rape, you will be stoned to death for the crime of unchastity.
* Obey all orders of the mutawa. Do not interfere or even tarry if you see them enforcing sharia against women who do not follow the Code of Conduct.
Why? Muslims are born and raised in a patriarchal society—where some conservative whites desire a return those “glory” days—by which women are considered to be chattel, stupid.
Muslims and Christians are related in that way--keep women where they should be, right?
To paraphrase Roissy, why be a sucker at marriage and raising kids when you can suck out the lifeblood of being single and chasin’ skirts? And to paraphrase Jim at Jim’s blog, there is no such thing as marital rape.
Jefferson—“Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.”
Because they do not strictly practice Islam. It’s not an uncommon experience for single, out of work men to search for other ways to satiate their desires for masculinizing behavior, whether it be buying a truck, pumping iron, or aggressively gaming chicks. Again, it’s the Roissy lifestyle!
“These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.”
Corrected for accuracy —> These Muslim men are behaving like any member, regardless of race or ethnicity, of the criminal underclass.
German_reader—“Any serious country would round them up (and rough them up in the process) and deport them. Instead they’re allowed to stay for years, game the system and commit crimes with a (to a large degree justified) feeling of impunity.”
Can’t say I disagree.
Flinders Petrie—“Germany is now a virtual petri dish of intersecting systems of oppression and discrimination; a synergistic blending of sexism, Islamophobia, bigotry, homophobia, and racism.”
You forgot to add “white privilege” and “Zionism”. You must be new here.
Radical Centrist—“On one thing, almost all economists agree: In the long term, the refugee crisis ought to be unambiguously positive for the European economy. Over time, the new arrivals should play an important role in addressing Europe’s alarming demographic trends, improving the ratio of workers to those who are economically inactive, a ratio that is falling in many countries.”
How did Carnegie and Rockefeller and Gould and Frick fare with immigrants at their disposal? How the United States become a global economic power by 1900?
Big Bill—“Groups of young horny Puerto Rican men milling around in Central Park started groping girls and tearing their clothes off.”
Roissy would characterize this behavior as being alpha-eseque. You really need to get with the program.
And happy New 2016 to you too, Corv. Still employing your usual schtick. An oldie but a goodie eh? I must say though, although your delivery is great (Bill Maher would envy you) and your timing is perfect, your material…a little long in the tooth, like a sitcom that’s overstretched it’s ratings highpoint. Hoping for some new stuff from you come the new year. Alas – think I’ll no longer bother with your posts Corv my boy. I wish you all the best in your 2016 Trollings!
Yours sincerely,
A. Sasquatch.
I wonder if the influx of Polish immigrants into the Ruhr during the 19th century had an effect of lowering the IQ in that prime industrial area?
A lot of xenophobic racism on this board. You can’t blame a whole group for the actions of a few. This was only a 1000 of millions of Muslims in Europe. Less than one percent
“…but even those with IQs lower than 80 would be aware that its not a true reflection of reality. “
Being somewhat acquainted with the mindset of the notorious male street culture of New Delhi, India, where “eve-teasing” is rampant, all actual white women are indeed seen to be behaviorally identical in reality to their XXX depictions.
This bizarre notion took off in the late 1960s when word of the Western sexual revolution reached those distant parts, along with busloads-tens of thousands-of hippies on the overland trail from Europe, eager to demonstrate the rumored shedding of inhibition in the fleabag hotels of Delhi and on the beaches of Goa.
India, lightly policed and prudish by Victorian standards, gawped at the new arrivals in stunned silence.
Sex, available only after arranged marriage, seemed very, very close indeed, whenever a white female tourist walked by, to these young, not entirely employable, Indian men of the city streets, usually living away from the strictures of rural life and their own rigid family and social heirarchies.
Since then, it appears to have become unshakable belief.
Goa, then:
http://static.messynessychic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/hippiebeach11-930x695.jpghttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/-K8FaD1M0iIw/VUXkvRyDrNI/AAAAAAAAJj0/1o0WH8dZIhg/s1600/hippiebeach11-930x695.jpg
That’s some pretty weak tea, eh? She forgot to mention joining a women’s support group for victims of violence.
Some of the worst (meaning most enthusiastic and accomplished) politicians IME are in the +.75 SD range of IQ–100 to about 110. Same as the worst (meaning most enthusiastic and accomplished) bureaucrats.
Just bright enough to work the system and manipulate the less bright and those in their own range, which amounts to about 80% of the total population. Not bright enough to see the consequences of their actions.
Possessing fairly base motives, like desire for popularity, to offset the meager hostilities they’ve experienced for being a little smart and the resentment they have of the brighter fraction.
Wanting to be like the dead-nuts-on-mean-IQ jocks (e.g.)…unable to.
In Merkel’s case, add the element of being a female nobody wanted to mate with. She’s got to distinguish herself somehow. There’s something psychosexually very weird about her importing masses of swarthy young virile mean-IQ-85ish types. Seems absolutely designed to get even with white German men. And the white German women who got what she didn’t (spouse, children, family),.
Of course I don’t know what Merkel’s IQ is. Anybody got any references or estimates?
I guess the other possibility is that she’s bright enough to qualify for the top 20%, which can bring its own set of problems. But the fact that she started out as a commie tells me that she’s more of the apparatchik class who soared high on the female vote and the Tulip Mania of gynephilia.
Merkel was married once from 1977-82 and has been married to her second husband, a chemist, since 1998. Whatever explains her corruption, stupidity, or insanity, it is not the result of being "a female nobody wanted to mate with."
http://img.timeinc.net/time/daily/2007/0711/360_merkel_husband_1108.jpg
Judging by the body language I wouldn't be surprised if he was an influence on her.
If 1% of an imported food product lead to poisonings, we’d ban it.
Looks like Haven Monahan’s getting around.
BTW – before typing this I did a search of both ‘haven’ and ‘monahan’ and nothing popped up. Not so long ago no story of this sort could get to 171 comments without a shout out to Haven.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2PSa3AzxskQ/T6ww3aqpaWI/AAAAAAAAJQU/E32VFSHOamU/s1600/group-differences.jpg
Just bright enough to work the system and manipulate the less bright and those in their own range, which amounts to about 80% of the total population. Not bright enough to see the consequences of their actions.
Possessing fairly base motives, like desire for popularity, to offset the meager hostilities they've experienced for being a little smart and the resentment they have of the brighter fraction.
Wanting to be like the dead-nuts-on-mean-IQ jocks (e.g.)...unable to.
In Merkel's case, add the element of being a female nobody wanted to mate with. She's got to distinguish herself somehow. There's something psychosexually very weird about her importing masses of swarthy young virile mean-IQ-85ish types. Seems absolutely designed to get even with white German men. And the white German women who got what she didn't (spouse, children, family),.
Of course I don't know what Merkel's IQ is. Anybody got any references or estimates?
I guess the other possibility is that she's bright enough to qualify for the top 20%, which can bring its own set of problems. But the fact that she started out as a commie tells me that she's more of the apparatchik class who soared high on the female vote and the Tulip Mania of gynephilia.
Merkel’s doctorate is in physical chemistry:
Untersuchung des Mechanismus von Zerfallsreaktionen mit einfachem Bindungsbruch und Berechnung ihrer Geschwindigkeitskonstanten auf der Grundlage quantenchemischer und statistischer Methoden (Investigation of the mechanism of decay reactions with single bond breaking and calculation of their velocity constants on the basis of quantum chemical and statistical methods)
Where shall the Germans take refuge?
Is this question ever asked?
To paraphrase Houellebecq, the Germans have no Israel to go to.
Brilliant!
Well, I do know that she was a working physicist (molecular quantum mechanics) until her mid 30s. It’s a safe bet that it’s pretty high up in that top 20%.
The need for approval from the media, from fellow politicians, from the people with whom she socializes at Davos and other meetings and conferences. And she got what she wanted - she's Time's person of the year.
Yeah, she’s being bombarded by the equivalent of pheromones that change her behavior. It’s the same thing that happens to Supreme Court justices after they’re appointed by Republican Presidents.
The migrants will not demand loosening of gun control laws. They can already obtain assault weapons via migrant controlled smuggling networks. It is only the native population that would benefit from easier legal access to guns, and the migrants obviously would not like to see their victims become able to defend themselves. They’re not stupid.
Why? Muslims are born and raised in a patriarchal society—where some conservative whites desire a return those “glory” days—by which women are considered to be chattel, stupid.
Muslims and Christians are related in that way--keep women where they should be, right?
To paraphrase Roissy, why be a sucker at marriage and raising kids when you can suck out the lifeblood of being single and chasin’ skirts? And to paraphrase Jim at Jim’s blog, there is no such thing as marital rape.
Jefferson—“Why are Muslim men getting drunk? The koran prohibits alcohol consumption.”
Because they do not strictly practice Islam. It’s not an uncommon experience for single, out of work men to search for other ways to satiate their desires for masculinizing behavior, whether it be buying a truck, pumping iron, or aggressively gaming chicks. Again, it’s the Roissy lifestyle!
“These Arab Muslim men are behaving like a bunch of Roma Gypsies.”
Corrected for accuracy —> These Muslim men are behaving like any member, regardless of race or ethnicity, of the criminal underclass.
German_reader—“Any serious country would round them up (and rough them up in the process) and deport them. Instead they’re allowed to stay for years, game the system and commit crimes with a (to a large degree justified) feeling of impunity.”
Can’t say I disagree.
Flinders Petrie—“Germany is now a virtual petri dish of intersecting systems of oppression and discrimination; a synergistic blending of sexism, Islamophobia, bigotry, homophobia, and racism.”
You forgot to add “white privilege” and “Zionism”. You must be new here.
Radical Centrist—“On one thing, almost all economists agree: In the long term, the refugee crisis ought to be unambiguously positive for the European economy. Over time, the new arrivals should play an important role in addressing Europe’s alarming demographic trends, improving the ratio of workers to those who are economically inactive, a ratio that is falling in many countries.”
How did Carnegie and Rockefeller and Gould and Frick fare with immigrants at their disposal? How the United States become a global economic power by 1900?
Big Bill—“Groups of young horny Puerto Rican men milling around in Central Park started groping girls and tearing their clothes off.”
Roissy would characterize this behavior as being alpha-eseque. You really need to get with the program.
Obviously, Roissy is a short-sighted hedonistic fool. As for Jim, I have no idea who he is, but his view on marital rape is basic common sense recognized by the common law for centuries. It was not controversial in the least until maybe 30 or 40 years ago.
The f*cking stupid Italians now import Moroccans by the million.
Germany f*cked them over then - they turned Italy into a battle ground, a prolonged, destructive, gut wrenching battle ground.
Now Germany is being, literally, f*cked over by some rather nasty, priapic Moroccans, and the current Fuhrerlein is protecting them.
I simply cannot get over the dumbness of white people. Or the evil of The Economist.
And apparently you cannot get over inserting the Nazi narrative into everything either.
Genuine refugees are just people on the losing side of a conflict. That doesn’t turn them into angels.
Everyone in the Middle East and Africa is or will be a refugee at some point. That includes the guys beheading and throwing people off buildings in Syria. Europe should limit its intake to white refugees from South Africa, Zimbabwe and other such places.
I don’t know much about the German aristocracy, but the director of /The Lives of Others and The Tourist (Depp/Jolie movie) is a real specimen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florian_Henckel_von_Donnersmarck
“Following the defeat of the Third Reich in 1945, the Henckel von Donnersmarcks lost their fortune due to expulsion from Silesia by Ukrainian troops of Soviet Army.”
They may have lost their money, but not their amazing class!
They did no such thing. To the contrary, it is the people who tell us what lessons we should learn from the Nazi episode who have made it impossible to think and talk clearly about race and culture and genetics.
Sort of Off Topic:
I watched the first episode of “Deutschland 83″, a cold war spy drama set in 1983 in West Germany. Available on the usual online outlets.
It it told from the perspective of East Germany, the first episode was pretty good.
After watching it, I thought about how easy it must have been for East German spies to infiltrate the West German military and diplomatic corps.
Including Merkel's Ossi compatriots (who highlight the difference quite particularly when compared to west germans).
If anything Merkel is just being as 'westerner' as possible.
The reason that say, Hungary has a more sane attitude towards multicultural suicide is the lack of female driven consumerism.
What’s wrong with the West is not ‘the Jews’ which when very, very Jewish Samuel Goldwyn, Louis B. Mayer, and Jack Warner were running Hollywood had Yankee Doodle Dandy and John Wayne defeating the Japanese and the Apache. Rather it is decades of advertisers pandering to the WORST of female desires: hatred of beta White males (the origin of PC/Multikult and anti-Whitism) for lack of sexy dominance, excuse making for Alpha males, social competition for being most holy, herd mentality conformism, etc.
Women make or influence about 85% of consumer purchases, so advertisers just pander to their desires figuring that if they offend males well too bad, they’re playing the numbers game. And that numbers game plays right into mass Third World immigration, and excuse making for mass rapes by the Cathedral while there is a female meltdown over a fat White guy engineer wearing a shirt with hula girls on it while helping land a probe on a comet. Or an engineer getting fired for making a dongle joke at a programming convention. Or a female meltdown over a nerd asking her for coffee in an elevator.
Look at what women don’t do. Not whatever excuses they make. They never criticize Muslims and their primitive attitudes towards women.
Female driven mass consumerism and mass advertising are like steroids pushing society to ultra feminism. Women have less of a role and importance in Eastern lands because advertising is still so new and consumerism so unsteady. Switzerland is more of the same — it had granted women the vote only in the 1970s, and had and still does hefty restrictions on advertising and mass marketing. As does Japan, with its deliberately maintained retail small holder inefficiencies and higher costs.
As I see it, the West is suffering from a condition I'll call empathobesity.
For a long time, an egalitarian, empathetic impulse was an asset in the West as it created an ever expanding educated and productive class of citizens by expanding political franchise from monarchs to lords to wealthy commoners to middle class men to all men to all adults, followed by welfare and universal healthcare etc.
To illustrate using the example of England, starting with the Magna Carta in 1215, we have the English civil war in 1642, the glorious revolution in 1688, Habeas Corpus, the reform acts of the 19th century, the representation of the people acts of the early 20th, feminism, Welfare, the sexual revolution, mass migration, gay rights, animal rights, transgender rights and so on.
Initially these steps have had a positive payoff as they expanded the class of educated people able to undertake scientific and industrial progress. This is why the scientific and industrial revolutions occurred in England where also we see the first diffusion of political power with the Magna Carta in 1215.
Over time, this empathetic, egalitarianist impulse has calcified into a dogma. Probably in the early to mid 20th century, this dogma has run into diminishing and even negative returns.
Thus, the extension of empathy to adherents of a hostile religion is likely to be a major drag, not gain, a point well proven by this incident. The mass importation of low skilled illegal immigrants will not enhance the economic welfare of the recipient nation.
The feminist movement initially increased the pool of educated workers, but by eschewing reproduction, have condemned the West to declining human and financial resources just as the mass of poorly educated and integrated aliens, especially in Europe, starts to spike.
Yet, like an obese person compelled by instinct to eat in excess, the West cannot shake off its pathological empathy (hence empathobesity).
I've made this argument in more detail at tarkmarg.blogspot.com. Please have a look and see if you find it convincing.
I think you’ve derailed your narrative. The Regicide and the Glorious Revolution were plutocratic endeavors. The movers and shakers behind those events weren’t yielding to any sort of empathetic impulse.
It's true that the parliamentary side in the English civil war was far from your standard issue Marxist study circle. But what I'm trying to show is a trend of constant widening of the circle of political power over time, which I'd suggest flows from a egalitarianist impulse such that the plutocrats did not view themselves as inferior to King Charles. IMO these precedents are also a prerequisite to embolden those seeking further expansions of the circle of power.
Incidentally, the parliamentary forces had distinctly leftist factions like the diggers and levellers, who nicely foreshadow the continental revolutionaries of the 18th (French Revolution) and 19th century.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2PSa3AzxskQ/T6ww3aqpaWI/AAAAAAAAJQU/E32VFSHOamU/s1600/group-differences.jpg
Just bright enough to work the system and manipulate the less bright and those in their own range, which amounts to about 80% of the total population. Not bright enough to see the consequences of their actions.
Possessing fairly base motives, like desire for popularity, to offset the meager hostilities they've experienced for being a little smart and the resentment they have of the brighter fraction.
Wanting to be like the dead-nuts-on-mean-IQ jocks (e.g.)...unable to.
In Merkel's case, add the element of being a female nobody wanted to mate with. She's got to distinguish herself somehow. There's something psychosexually very weird about her importing masses of swarthy young virile mean-IQ-85ish types. Seems absolutely designed to get even with white German men. And the white German women who got what she didn't (spouse, children, family),.
Of course I don't know what Merkel's IQ is. Anybody got any references or estimates?
I guess the other possibility is that she's bright enough to qualify for the top 20%, which can bring its own set of problems. But the fact that she started out as a commie tells me that she's more of the apparatchik class who soared high on the female vote and the Tulip Mania of gynephilia.
“In Merkel’s case, add the element of being a female nobody wanted to mate with.”
Merkel was married once from 1977-82 and has been married to her second husband, a chemist, since 1998. Whatever explains her corruption, stupidity, or insanity, it is not the result of being “a female nobody wanted to mate with.”
You're missing an "n" in "Germany" in the headline, btw, Steve.
Germay is actually a fairly common men’s name in Eritrea.
The need for approval from the media, from fellow politicians, from the people with whom she socializes at Davos and other meetings and conferences. And she got what she wanted - she's Time's person of the year.
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict, tols a young American priest that not only did the press’s attacks not bother him, if they went for three days without doing so he felt the need to examine his conscience.
Too bad for Germany he was elected by the College of Cardinals rather than by the German people.
You not only can — you must! A group can’t act except through its members.
Thanks for your feedback Ben.
It’s true that the parliamentary side in the English civil war was far from your standard issue Marxist study circle. But what I’m trying to show is a trend of constant widening of the circle of political power over time, which I’d suggest flows from a egalitarianist impulse such that the plutocrats did not view themselves as inferior to King Charles. IMO these precedents are also a prerequisite to embolden those seeking further expansions of the circle of power.
Incidentally, the parliamentary forces had distinctly leftist factions like the diggers and levellers, who nicely foreshadow the continental revolutionaries of the 18th (French Revolution) and 19th century.
There were no "leftist factions" in the parliamentary forces. You are missing the religious inspiration of the whole movement, including its most extreme and eccentric splinters. As attitudes changed, later historians forgot what the rebellion had really been about and interpreted it in terms of their own preoccupations with liberty and - later on - class conflict.
“The rise in regard for Mary was a key aspect of the shift from the Dark Ages to the Middle Ages.”
One of several aspects working in concert. The rise of towns and trade, a rapid rise in population, the development of merchant and craft guilds, and the power of the bourgeoisie. Things we learned in World History.
I found part of this argument in Chesterton’s A Short History of England:
Chivalry might be called the baptism of Feudalism. It was an attempt to bring the justice and even the logic of the Catholic creed into a military system which already existed; to turn its discipline into an initiation and its inequalities into a hierarchy. To the comparative grace of the new period belongs, of course, that considerable cultus of the dignity of woman, to which the word “chivalry” is often narrowed, or perhaps exalted. This also was a revolt against one of the worst gaps in the more polished civilization of the Saracens. Moslems denied even souls to women; perhaps from the same instinct which recoiled from the sacred birth, with its inevitable glorification of the mother; perhaps merely because, having originally had tents rather than houses, they had slaves rather than housewives. It is false to say that the chivalric view of women was merely an affectation, except in the sense in which there must always be an affectation where there is an ideal. It is the worst sort of superficiality not to see the pressure of a general sentiment merely because it is always broken up by events; the Crusade itself, for example, is more present and potent as a dream even than as a reality. From the first Plantagenet to the last Lancastrian it haunts the minds of English kings, giving as a background to their battles a mirage of Palestine. So a devotion like that of Edward I. to his queen was quite a real motive in the lives of multitudes of his contemporaries. When crowds of enlightened tourists, setting forth to sneer at the superstitions of the continent, are taking tickets and labelling luggage at the large railway station at the west end of the Strand, I do not know whether they all speak to their wives with a more flowing courtesy than their fathers in Edward’s time, or whether they pause to meditate on the legend of a husband’s sorrow, to be found in the very name of Charing Cross.
“The rise of chivalry spurred the rise of Western civilization itself, which fought against barbarians who didn’t have the same respect for women.”
You’re going to have to be clearer as far as who are these “barbarians” and how you define “respect for women”. Vikings, for example, were considered barbaric, I suppose, but the menfolk granted their women tremendous freedom compared to other European societies of that era. Women managed the finances of the family, ran the farm in their husband’s absence. If widowed, they (gasp) could own land and control wealth. Would these actions from your point of view be “disrespectful”?
Regarding chivalry, historian Jean Charles Leonard de Sismondi responds, “The more closely we look into history, the more clearly shall we perceive that the system of chivalry is an invention almost entirely poetical. It is impossible to distinguish the countries in which it is said to have prevailed. It is always represented as distant from us both in time and place, and whilst the contemporary historians give us a clear, detailed, and complete account of the vices of the court and the great, of the ferocity or corruption of the nobles, and of the servility of the people, we are astonished to find the poets, after a long lapse of time, adorning the very same ages with the most splendid fictions of grace, virtue, and loyalty. The Romance writers of the twelfth century placed the age of chivalry in the time of Charlemagne. The period when these writers existed, is the time pointed out by Francis I. At the present day [about 1810], we imagine we can still see chivalry flourishing in the persons of Du Guesclin and Bayard, under Charles V and Francis I. But when we come to examine either the one period or the other, although we find in each some heroic spirits, we are forced to confess that it is necessary to antedate the age of chivalry, at least three or four centuries before any period of authentic history.”
I also question whether European “chivalry” entailed men jackbooting the children of their sworn enemies, most notably during the Crusades and during the Age of Exploration.
Daniel Williams–”You’ve got a Jan Brady thing happening here. Do you go to Chateau Heartiste to tell the world what Sailer says and thinks?”
Well, Mr. Sailer does have a link to CH. Moreover, I’m told that “real men” adhere to his advice, and that CH assuredly informs his readers that Mr. Sailer is “the real deal”. What do YOU think?
Ben Tillman–”Obviously, Roissy is a short-sighted hedonistic fool.”
Actually, he would call you a jealous beta for making that remark.
And in other news, the same people were shocked to learn Italian-Americans love pizza, Deadheads have an affinity for drugs, and Cal Ripken has a serious work ethic.
Who knew?
Tamir might not have been the sharpest pencil in the drawer but what, even by ghetto logic, would the point be of pulling a toy gun on a cop?
Google “tamir rice enhanced video”
The enhanced video pretty clearly shows Tamir hiking up his right shoulder, pulling something out of his waistband with his right hand, and his left hand pulling up his sweater. The gun can also be seen (just barely) on the ground after he falls.
I, personally don’t know why he did it, but I also don’t know why he paraded around on the street brandishing the gun for ten minutes before that.
Yours sincerely,
A. Sasquatch.
It’s really not trollings, it’s more meanderings of truth sprinkled in with sardonic, intellectual barbs. It’s not really in your wheelhouse. You’re more suited for Hekyl and Jeckyl type antics. I wish you the best in trying to improve upon your own material. Too much milquetoast and sugary pleasantries for my palate. But, to each their own…
The f*cking stupid Italians now import Moroccans by the million.
Germany f*cked them over then - they turned Italy into a battle ground, a prolonged, destructive, gut wrenching battle ground.
Now Germany is being, literally, f*cked over by some rather nasty, priapic Moroccans, and the current Fuhrerlein is protecting them.
I simply cannot get over the dumbness of white people. Or the evil of The Economist.
Yeah, I know about those Moroccans running amok in Italy during WW2. My English grandfather was there, near Caserta in 1944, local Italians complained about the rapes and the pillaging committed by the Moroccans. My grandfather’s unit eventually rounded up some of those Moroccans (on threat they would be shot if they resisted) and beat them with rifle butts until they were bloody…probably killed a few of the bastards. Something like this would be needed today as well, but Germany is such a joke, nothing will happen. Already the main concern of the establishment is once again that this not be “exploited” by right-wingers.
Do much hand wringing, time and money wasted when a few hits from a rifle would send a better message.
In Cologne today they are having a protest... Against racism and sexism. No mention of alien invaders or cultural decay.
Some actually do, they had a lengthy segment in today’s news about Obama’s plans to restrict gun ownership (of course very much in favour of that).
It's extremely rare for US media to discuss domestic politics in other lands.
Sorry to break it to you, but they were a pretty big deal.
I spent New Year's eve in Munich with my two (blonde, American) college age daughters. We found a place away from the center for a late dinner and about 11:30 the three of us started making our way to the main square, Marienplatz, to witness the celebration. As we got closer, the volume of fireworks going off increased dramatically (earlier in the day, I noticed in a supermarket a large food case filled with all manner of rockets and firecrackers for sale).The street leading into Marienplatz became increasingly clogged with people, some setting off fireworks, others watching. In the spirit of adventure, we decided to brave the crowds and shoulder through into the square, especially as our hotel lay on the opposite side.
Once fully in the square, I noticed that there were very few Germans there. Those that were remained on the periphery, watching. Instead, the entire square was filled with thousands of what were obviously young Middle Eastern males. I don't know where they all materialized from as they were very little in evidence on the city streets in the days preceding, nor were they visible at the Christmas markets.
It was absolute pandemonium in the square with rockets going off in all directions, bouncing off buildings, caroming off the pavement. A couple of guys were holding their faces where they had been hit by ordnance. It seemed too late to turn back once we were inside, so we clung to the edge of the square and shouldered and elbowed our way through, dodging explosives all the way.
Almost immediately, both my daughters complained of being groped by unseen hands. It was so crowded, it was impossible for me to see anyone specifically doing anything, especially as I was concentrating on just getting us through without being hit by a rocket (although one guy--looked Kazhaki-- did approach me and asked my permission to kiss my daughter!). After that, I took the hand of my younger daughter, pulling her along, bulldozing through. The other one was a bit ahead. By the time we got to the other side and found a small space to pause, both girls told me they had been grabbed and groped numerous times. Butt and breasts grabbed, hair pulled, rude comments... it was an unrestrained testosterone gauntlet. I couldn't say whether many of these swarthy Mideast miscreants were drunk (after all they are Muslim), but a few obviously were. This was really unexpected.
I saw no police presence in the square at all, but that could have been because a terrorist bomb threat had just come in and they were in the process of closing Munich's main train station (and one other). I suspect similarly unpleasant situations occurred in the crowded squares of many German (and probably Swedish) cities on December 31 that went unreported.
Incidentally, I am now in Berlin and you would never know they have an immigrant problem in Germany. Ethnically, it's as homogenous here as small town America circa 1957. That's why so many Germans are in denial or supportive of Merkel's welcome policy. They have not been affected in the least. Not yet.
Interesting, I read some reader’s comment on a German website that also said there was such stuff going on in Munich. This may be worse than I had thought.
With all due respect, if it's worse than you thought, what in heaven's name were you thinking?
Your nation's leader--and a leader of the Western world-- has invited unintelligent, amoral, violent marauders to invade your country where they will be supported by its taxpayers and where they are free to assault its citizens.
Yes. There are worse things. Merkel could nuke Bavaria as a warning to the rest of Germany that resistance to her policy of importing a human pestilence is futile. Or a comet could strike Germany. But absent those extreme situations, this is about as bad as it gets.
“Somewhere”? I am certainly not going to leave Germany. Europe is still 1st choice for culturally sensitive people.
Why not apply force to get them to leave? Or pay all this uneducated low-IQ, low ability 3rd world scum to leave? Why should we watch thousands of years of civilization getting destroyed by retards?
Kant and Goethe are turning in their graves.
I'd stress that third worlders aren't "scum", they are humans and deserve basic human rights. But ethnic Germans should have some right to exist as a distinct and segregated group of people as most other major ethnic groups have.You shouldn't. Find some reasonable course of action to make the world a better place that doesn't involve wanton destruction or oppression.
It's true that the parliamentary side in the English civil war was far from your standard issue Marxist study circle. But what I'm trying to show is a trend of constant widening of the circle of political power over time, which I'd suggest flows from a egalitarianist impulse such that the plutocrats did not view themselves as inferior to King Charles. IMO these precedents are also a prerequisite to embolden those seeking further expansions of the circle of power.
Incidentally, the parliamentary forces had distinctly leftist factions like the diggers and levellers, who nicely foreshadow the continental revolutionaries of the 18th (French Revolution) and 19th century.
English history is the worst possible place to look for an “egalitarianist impulse”.
There were no “leftist factions” in the parliamentary forces. You are missing the religious inspiration of the whole movement, including its most extreme and eccentric splinters. As attitudes changed, later historians forgot what the rebellion had really been about and interpreted it in terms of their own preoccupations with liberty and – later on – class conflict.
"The Levellers were a political movement during the English Civil War that emphasised popular sovereignty, extended suffrage, common land ownership, equality before the law, and religious tolerance, all of which were expressed in the manifesto "Agreement of the People". "
This sounds classically leftist.
Regarding the diggers:
"In 1649 Gerrard Winstanley and 14 others published a pamphlet[3] in which they called themselves the "True Levellers" to distinguish their ideas from those of the Levellers. Once they put their idea into practice and started to cultivate common land, both opponents and supporters began to call them "Diggers". The Diggers' beliefs were informed by Winstanley's writings which envisioned an ecological interrelationship between humans and nature, acknowledging the inherent connections between people and their surroundings.[citation needed] Winstanley declared that "true freedom lies where a man receives his nourishment and preservation, and that is in the use of the earth".[6]"
Another quote from leveller Colonel Thomas Rainborough:
" I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he, and therefore truly, sir, I think it is clear to every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that government.”"
Of course, both the levellers and diggers were eventually suppressed by Cromwell so their beliefs cannot be taken as representing the parliament's position. But they did fight on the parliamentary side, so it seems to me that they were foreshadowing the future.
That is more or less the same thing.
The event is essentially irrelevant; what maters is the monopoly of the megaphone.
In November 2013, the NYT published a stupid hit piece (which Steve addressed) scapegoating Dallas conservatives for a Soviet Commie's murder of the President in 1963. They don't need an event that matches the desired narrative.
Look at Jackie Coakley. Trayvon Martin.
And what are the real lessons of the Nazi phenomenon? Diversity is dangerous. Diversity is deadly. You can't have genocide without diversity. You can't have genocide without immigration.
At Nuremberg, the Allied tribunal told us that waging aggressive war was wrong, so at least they got that right for a while, but that's been tossed by the wayside as the megaphone monopolists have cheered on government aggression against Iraq et al.
Maybe the Muslims are attracted to the scent of German women’s cologne?
There were no "leftist factions" in the parliamentary forces. You are missing the religious inspiration of the whole movement, including its most extreme and eccentric splinters. As attitudes changed, later historians forgot what the rebellion had really been about and interpreted it in terms of their own preoccupations with liberty and - later on - class conflict.
Thanks for your reply. I certainly can’t claim to be an expert in English history, but my reading of this topic seems to support my conclusions. Regarding “leftist factions” in the English civil war, wiki has this about the levellers:
“The Levellers were a political movement during the English Civil War that emphasised popular sovereignty, extended suffrage, common land ownership, equality before the law, and religious tolerance, all of which were expressed in the manifesto “Agreement of the People”. ”
This sounds classically leftist.
Regarding the diggers:
“In 1649 Gerrard Winstanley and 14 others published a pamphlet[3] in which they called themselves the “True Levellers” to distinguish their ideas from those of the Levellers. Once they put their idea into practice and started to cultivate common land, both opponents and supporters began to call them “Diggers”. The Diggers’ beliefs were informed by Winstanley’s writings which envisioned an ecological interrelationship between humans and nature, acknowledging the inherent connections between people and their surroundings.[citation needed] Winstanley declared that “true freedom lies where a man receives his nourishment and preservation, and that is in the use of the earth”.[6]”
Another quote from leveller Colonel Thomas Rainborough:
” I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he, and therefore truly, sir, I think it is clear to every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that government.””
Of course, both the levellers and diggers were eventually suppressed by Cromwell so their beliefs cannot be taken as representing the parliament’s position. But they did fight on the parliamentary side, so it seems to me that they were foreshadowing the future.
2) parliament + everyone must be anglican
3) dissenters wanting religious freedom for their groupsDespite being a minority the dissenters made up the core of Cromwell's army - as being disciplined religious fanatics made them more or less unbeatable.After the defeat of the Royalist factions Cromwell tried to make a compromise between Parliament and the dissenter Army but in the end it wasn't possible.And yes a lot of those dissenter groups: Levellers, Diggers, Quakers, Shakers etc were archetypal religious egalitarians that made up one strand that went into Leftism - with the Levellers being most clearly so even by the name.A lot of them moved to the US.(Now I think of it maybe a lot of them moving to the US is why England lagged behind France in revolutionary spirit 150 years later?)(I wonder how many of the founding fathers had ancestors who fought in the New Model Army?)
The suggested code of conduct includes maintaining an arm’s length distance from strangers, to stick within your own group, to ask bystanders for help or to intervene as a witness, or to inform the police if you are the victim of such an assault.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/mayor-of-cologne-says-women-should-have-code-of-conduct-to-prevent-future-assault-a6798186.html
Victims speak out after nightmare New Year in Cologne5
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=76f_1452034893
“ask bystanders for help”
“let’s you and him fight”
Ask away, strong independent women who don’t need no steenkin’ man. I won’t be going to jail for assaulting or otherwise offending a member of the Protected Classes.
Still no reason to foist the Nazi angle on every German affair. But of course this is apparently all you know about Germany.
"ragazza" is Italian for "girl".
“razzia” – that’s the one, ty, I’d forgotten it.
Rotherham showed that upper middle class feminists would rather working class children be raped than be seen as racists.
Including Merkel's Ossi compatriots (who highlight the difference quite particularly when compared to west germans).
If anything Merkel is just being as 'westerner' as possible.
Proof that what’s happening in the West is the result of 60 years of media poisoning,
But can Merkel really think a bunch of angry Muslim men will ever vote for her party, the Christian Democrats? These mad dogs are not just bad for Germany, they are bad for her party. Dumb...
The capitalist parties support it because their donors want the cheap labor.
The socialist parties support it for the votes.
Europhiles support it for divide and rule.
Some support it because they want to see the destruction of the european peoples.
As I see it, the West is suffering from a condition I'll call empathobesity.
For a long time, an egalitarian, empathetic impulse was an asset in the West as it created an ever expanding educated and productive class of citizens by expanding political franchise from monarchs to lords to wealthy commoners to middle class men to all men to all adults, followed by welfare and universal healthcare etc.
To illustrate using the example of England, starting with the Magna Carta in 1215, we have the English civil war in 1642, the glorious revolution in 1688, Habeas Corpus, the reform acts of the 19th century, the representation of the people acts of the early 20th, feminism, Welfare, the sexual revolution, mass migration, gay rights, animal rights, transgender rights and so on.
Initially these steps have had a positive payoff as they expanded the class of educated people able to undertake scientific and industrial progress. This is why the scientific and industrial revolutions occurred in England where also we see the first diffusion of political power with the Magna Carta in 1215.
Over time, this empathetic, egalitarianist impulse has calcified into a dogma. Probably in the early to mid 20th century, this dogma has run into diminishing and even negative returns.
Thus, the extension of empathy to adherents of a hostile religion is likely to be a major drag, not gain, a point well proven by this incident. The mass importation of low skilled illegal immigrants will not enhance the economic welfare of the recipient nation.
The feminist movement initially increased the pool of educated workers, but by eschewing reproduction, have condemned the West to declining human and financial resources just as the mass of poorly educated and integrated aliens, especially in Europe, starts to spike.
Yet, like an obese person compelled by instinct to eat in excess, the West cannot shake off its pathological empathy (hence empathobesity).
I've made this argument in more detail at tarkmarg.blogspot.com. Please have a look and see if you find it convincing.
I think that’s the gist of it and over time that impulse would have extended to an anti (unfounded) racism however that impulse was explicitly redirected into an all encompassing anti-racism by the electronic media who filtered the facts of the matter to create the desired end result i.e. censorship of anti-white racism combined with a magnification of white racism.
The result is the current PC religion based on and driven by a completely falsified set of data.
I said nothing about angels.
The internal “Great Migration” in the US ought to have followed the same pattern as international blue-collar migration has had in Europe…
disproportionately young male at first and concentrated in certain areas at a time leading to…
- violent competition over females
- gang violence
- sexual violence
- forced prostitution
Quite. The biggest single victim group of the inner city black gang culture are 14 year old black girls.
The media won’t report it because it messes up their anti-white narrative.
I imagine then you have the numbers to back up your claim...
That’s the origin of it and where it got its name. It was meant to ward off The Black Death.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2PSa3AzxskQ/T6ww3aqpaWI/AAAAAAAAJQU/E32VFSHOamU/s1600/group-differences.jpg
Just bright enough to work the system and manipulate the less bright and those in their own range, which amounts to about 80% of the total population. Not bright enough to see the consequences of their actions.
Possessing fairly base motives, like desire for popularity, to offset the meager hostilities they've experienced for being a little smart and the resentment they have of the brighter fraction.
Wanting to be like the dead-nuts-on-mean-IQ jocks (e.g.)...unable to.
In Merkel's case, add the element of being a female nobody wanted to mate with. She's got to distinguish herself somehow. There's something psychosexually very weird about her importing masses of swarthy young virile mean-IQ-85ish types. Seems absolutely designed to get even with white German men. And the white German women who got what she didn't (spouse, children, family),.
Of course I don't know what Merkel's IQ is. Anybody got any references or estimates?
I guess the other possibility is that she's bright enough to qualify for the top 20%, which can bring its own set of problems. But the fact that she started out as a commie tells me that she's more of the apparatchik class who soared high on the female vote and the Tulip Mania of gynephilia.
Merkel’s husband
Judging by the body language I wouldn’t be surprised if he was an influence on her.
"The Levellers were a political movement during the English Civil War that emphasised popular sovereignty, extended suffrage, common land ownership, equality before the law, and religious tolerance, all of which were expressed in the manifesto "Agreement of the People". "
This sounds classically leftist.
Regarding the diggers:
"In 1649 Gerrard Winstanley and 14 others published a pamphlet[3] in which they called themselves the "True Levellers" to distinguish their ideas from those of the Levellers. Once they put their idea into practice and started to cultivate common land, both opponents and supporters began to call them "Diggers". The Diggers' beliefs were informed by Winstanley's writings which envisioned an ecological interrelationship between humans and nature, acknowledging the inherent connections between people and their surroundings.[citation needed] Winstanley declared that "true freedom lies where a man receives his nourishment and preservation, and that is in the use of the earth".[6]"
Another quote from leveller Colonel Thomas Rainborough:
" I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he, and therefore truly, sir, I think it is clear to every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that government.”"
Of course, both the levellers and diggers were eventually suppressed by Cromwell so their beliefs cannot be taken as representing the parliament's position. But they did fight on the parliamentary side, so it seems to me that they were foreshadowing the future.
There were three sides in the English part of the ECW (plus others in the Welsh, Scottish and Irish parts).
1) royalist + everyone must be catholic
2) parliament + everyone must be anglican
3) dissenters wanting religious freedom for their groups
Despite being a minority the dissenters made up the core of Cromwell’s army – as being disciplined religious fanatics made them more or less unbeatable.
After the defeat of the Royalist factions Cromwell tried to make a compromise between Parliament and the dissenter Army but in the end it wasn’t possible.
And yes a lot of those dissenter groups: Levellers, Diggers, Quakers, Shakers etc were archetypal religious egalitarians that made up one strand that went into Leftism – with the Levellers being most clearly so even by the name.
A lot of them moved to the US.
(Now I think of it maybe a lot of them moving to the US is why England lagged behind France in revolutionary spirit 150 years later?)
(I wonder how many of the founding fathers had ancestors who fought in the New Model Army?)
Also it'd be nice if you could point me to some authoritative references about the history of England over the past few centuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razzia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghazi_(warrior)
ty
A lot of xenophobic racism on this board. You can’t blame a whole group for the actions of a few. This was only a 1000 of millions of Muslims in Europe. Less than one percent.
Even if this is true, we cannot distinguish the 1% from the 99% until they commit crimes. This is especially true when they cross our borders en masse.
Even when crimes are committed, we are unable to deport the criminals. In fact, we don’t even send them to prison. The Cologne police declared that they knew who the criminals were, because they are the same multitude who had been arrested earlier for pickpocketing in the same area.
Compare and contrast with the genuine refugees who fled Nazi Germany. Did 1% of them go on a mass crime spree when they arrived in a new country? Was there a single such refugee who used guns or bombs to commit random slaughter in a holy war against his new hosts?
You don’t need to be xenophobic or racist to see that the arrival of a million migrants from dysfunctional societies is not necessarily to our advantage. The unqualified welcome extended by the likes of Merkel is the sign of a society that has lost the will to live. Africans and Middle Easterners sense that Western Europe is theirs for the taking, and they are not wrong.
Well yeah, you don’t expect to see Muhammad Al Muhammad in the starring role, do you?
The HBD angle to that might be
- exogamous marriage practise is enhanced if females are able to move about freely
- endogamous marriage practise is enhanced if females are terrorized into staying at home
so the rise of chivalry might tie into the shift in marriage practise.
As I see it, the West is suffering from a condition I'll call empathobesity.
For a long time, an egalitarian, empathetic impulse was an asset in the West as it created an ever expanding educated and productive class of citizens by expanding political franchise from monarchs to lords to wealthy commoners to middle class men to all men to all adults, followed by welfare and universal healthcare etc.
To illustrate using the example of England, starting with the Magna Carta in 1215, we have the English civil war in 1642, the glorious revolution in 1688, Habeas Corpus, the reform acts of the 19th century, the representation of the people acts of the early 20th, feminism, Welfare, the sexual revolution, mass migration, gay rights, animal rights, transgender rights and so on.
Initially these steps have had a positive payoff as they expanded the class of educated people able to undertake scientific and industrial progress. This is why the scientific and industrial revolutions occurred in England where also we see the first diffusion of political power with the Magna Carta in 1215.
Over time, this empathetic, egalitarianist impulse has calcified into a dogma. Probably in the early to mid 20th century, this dogma has run into diminishing and even negative returns.
Thus, the extension of empathy to adherents of a hostile religion is likely to be a major drag, not gain, a point well proven by this incident. The mass importation of low skilled illegal immigrants will not enhance the economic welfare of the recipient nation.
The feminist movement initially increased the pool of educated workers, but by eschewing reproduction, have condemned the West to declining human and financial resources just as the mass of poorly educated and integrated aliens, especially in Europe, starts to spike.
Yet, like an obese person compelled by instinct to eat in excess, the West cannot shake off its pathological empathy (hence empathobesity).
I've made this argument in more detail at tarkmarg.blogspot.com. Please have a look and see if you find it convincing.
I agree with Ben, but I still think that your overall theory has a lot of merit. Well done.
I also believe that NW Europeans evolved to favor certain traits – empathy and non-tribalism in particular – from around 1000 to, well, quite recently. I think that this allowed them to work together on a scale that tribal societies simply couldn’t match. You combine that ability to work in very large organizations with the technological advances of Europe over that time, and you get one kick-ass force.
Starting around 1500, this potent combination hit on a global scale. NW Europeans ran rough shod over the Earth for nearly 500 years. What a run. However, the moral underpinnings started to erode as the Enlightenment moved toward natural rights and universal rights. That slow moral decline was vastly accelerated with the Great White Civil War (WWI and WWII), which made many white intellectuals question their society and people.
So, you have whites already faltering when technology allows for mass communication and easy travel. Our biological evolution and moral code (universal rights) left (and leave) us wide open to being inundated by the the Third World hordes. The vast majority of whites simply have no psychological defense, especially when our media and academia is controlled by a combination of a bitter outside tribe and the most empathetic of whites.
As the Derb says, We are doomed!
However, I have to believe that some white will make it through all of this. Of course, those whites will be different, far less empathetic and much more tribal. Evolution at work.
Please try to spread the word. In particular I'd recommend popularizing the word "empathobesity" to refer to this condition because naming a condition is the first step to understanding and curing it.
Compare and contrast saturation Trayvon or Michael Brown hysteria to the Wichita massacre, that is if you have even have heard of the Wichita massacre.
The Law and Order SVU Season 4 Episode called “Dominance” was based on this case. Guess who played the murderers?
Well, you don’t have to guess you just already know.
That’s 90% of White women.
The US made sure to give the San Bernadino pair a Muslim burial. And tsarnaev a trial.
Do much hand wringing, time and money wasted when a few hits from a rifle would send a better message.
In Cologne today they are having a protest… Against racism and sexism. No mention of alien invaders or cultural decay.
Ok but how common is that?
It’s extremely rare for US media to discuss domestic politics in other lands.
In the 1990s the death penalty was also a prominent subject though that has somewhat faded out of view in recent years.
According to a client of mine up in Portland, ME, Atta and Alomari, two of the 9/11 hijackers, spent a good bit of their last night on Earth at Mark’s Showplace, a strip joint in Portland, after hitting a couple ATMs.
They flew to Boston from the Portland Jetport on 9/11.
“Interesting, I read some reader’s comment on a German website that also said there was such stuff going on in Munich. This may be worse than I had thought.”
With all due respect, if it’s worse than you thought, what in heaven’s name were you thinking?
Your nation’s leader–and a leader of the Western world– has invited unintelligent, amoral, violent marauders to invade your country where they will be supported by its taxpayers and where they are free to assault its citizens.
Yes. There are worse things. Merkel could nuke Bavaria as a warning to the rest of Germany that resistance to her policy of importing a human pestilence is futile. Or a comet could strike Germany. But absent those extreme situations, this is about as bad as it gets.
Well I would have thought that at least in Bavaria (which unlike rotten, leftie-dominated North-Rhine-Westphalia is normally a well-functioning state) police would bring those savages under control, but maybe I was mistaken. But hey, I have no illusions how bad all of this is...I'm one of the sane ones in Germany!
Lives in NYC(whee), hates her father, has no white sons
Thanks for posting this. It helped me understand the current state of those comments. I just clicked on that link and the top 5 reader’s picks were all NYT picks as well (from 900-1700+ recommends). All of these were at least skeptical about immigration. I thought I had entered an alternate reality (surely the Overton window has not moved that much at the NYT). After reading your post I looked more closely and saw the much harsher comments you quoted just below the top five. I guess when the NYT position is too unpopular it is necessary to give some publicity to the “sane/civil enemy” to prevent the really incriminating views being seen. Encouraging.
So do you mean that elsewhere on that night as well as during the rest of 2015 not a single crime was committed by muslim men in Europe? Not a single woman sexually harassed or worse?
The suggested code of conduct includes maintaining an arm’s length distance from strangers, to stick within your own group, to ask bystanders for help or to intervene as a witness, or to inform the police if you are the victim of such an assault.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/mayor-of-cologne-says-women-should-have-code-of-conduct-to-prevent-future-assault-a6798186.html
Victims speak out after nightmare New Year in Cologne5
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=76f_1452034893
She is admitting that this unprecedented attack is the new normal. Get used to it ladies of Germany
I kind of get the female response to feel sympathetic towards these refugees but I’m at a loss to understand why a normal German man would support it. Yet polls continually show Merkel has significant support.
Unlike the Turkish migration before which saw young couples move to Germany, this migration is dominated by young males with poor job prospects & even poorer dating options. Whatever your inclination towards refugees that alone should have given Merkel & European leaders pause.
Now they are stuck. You can’t deport one million people thousands of miles away. Well atleast she won Time person of the year, so there’s that.
It also must be remembered that in toto, there are not, in combination, one million police officers, armed forces personnel or other agents of law enforcement in Germany.
In other words, any talk of 'mass deportation' is pure bullshit, unless you want to unleash a bloody civil war.
With all due respect, if it's worse than you thought, what in heaven's name were you thinking?
Your nation's leader--and a leader of the Western world-- has invited unintelligent, amoral, violent marauders to invade your country where they will be supported by its taxpayers and where they are free to assault its citizens.
Yes. There are worse things. Merkel could nuke Bavaria as a warning to the rest of Germany that resistance to her policy of importing a human pestilence is futile. Or a comet could strike Germany. But absent those extreme situations, this is about as bad as it gets.
“With all due respect, if it’s worse than you thought, what in heaven’s name were you thinking? ”
Well I would have thought that at least in Bavaria (which unlike rotten, leftie-dominated North-Rhine-Westphalia is normally a well-functioning state) police would bring those savages under control, but maybe I was mistaken. But hey, I have no illusions how bad all of this is…I’m one of the sane ones in Germany!
I'm 1/4 German and find the situation there horrifying. Please stay safe and keep us posted.
There isn’t the political will to enforce basic borders or push for European ethno states, much less force a mass exile like what Algeria did to their Euro white population. German leaders like Merkel have knowingly pushed hard for mass foreign immigration.
I’d stress that third worlders aren’t “scum”, they are humans and deserve basic human rights. But ethnic Germans should have some right to exist as a distinct and segregated group of people as most other major ethnic groups have.
You shouldn’t. Find some reasonable course of action to make the world a better place that doesn’t involve wanton destruction or oppression.
It always puzzles me the way the left, in general, is so keen to assert the nationalistic right of the Palestinian people to live in their hereditary Palestinian state - presumably that much hated 'right' of ancient blood and soil applies in that case - but decries any attempt of European peoples to defend their ancient, ancestral motherlands as the ultimate anathema possible.
At bes tthe left is dumb. Dumb dumb dumb.
At worst, they are disgusting hypocrites.
It's extremely rare for US media to discuss domestic politics in other lands.
Well yes, but the US has an exceptional position as hegemon, Americans can afford not to care about the rest of the world. But German media is quite obsessed about the US…they are of course resolutely trans-atlantic in their basic orientation, but very, very concerned about gun violence (in their view the fault of right-wing rednecks) and racism (in their view pretty much unchanged since about 1915, they totally buy into BLM).
In the 1990s the death penalty was also a prominent subject though that has somewhat faded out of view in recent years.
In your estimation, do most Germans know blacks are only about 13% of the U.S. population?
It was written by "right-wing rednecks".
It’s a mile wide, and an inch deep. Humans are flexible strategizers, and the inflection point between perceived winning teams winds up looking like a “black swan,” when really it was no more complicated than every Soviet citizen loving the party, until they no longer feared hating it.
If multiculturalism is a religion, it’s a pitiful excuse for one. The fairy tales from 1-2k years ago offer far more fulfillment.
No, Rotherham showed that feminists would rather ignore rape of young girls by swarthy Muslims than be seen as racists.
Pigswallow. Commies were all about egalitarianism, blank-slatism, and “anti-racism,” and they killed far more people than the Nazis did.
Precisely.
Nonsense. Given a different elite, we’d be talking about how lucky we are that Communism made it impossible to support egalitarianism, blank-slatism, multiculturalism and “anti-racism.”
I'd stress that third worlders aren't "scum", they are humans and deserve basic human rights. But ethnic Germans should have some right to exist as a distinct and segregated group of people as most other major ethnic groups have.You shouldn't. Find some reasonable course of action to make the world a better place that doesn't involve wanton destruction or oppression.
Yep.
It always puzzles me the way the left, in general, is so keen to assert the nationalistic right of the Palestinian people to live in their hereditary Palestinian state – presumably that much hated ‘right’ of ancient blood and soil applies in that case – but decries any attempt of European peoples to defend their ancient, ancestral motherlands as the ultimate anathema possible.
At bes tthe left is dumb. Dumb dumb dumb.
At worst, they are disgusting hypocrites.
When Sunni Muslim Arabs from Syria are in crisis, the world expects working class white communities in Europe to make giant sacrifices so that the Sunni Muslim Arabs born into millions or billions of oil money can keep their lavish excesses. That is just beyond weird.
Unlike the Turkish migration before which saw young couples move to Germany, this migration is dominated by young males with poor job prospects & even poorer dating options. Whatever your inclination towards refugees that alone should have given Merkel & European leaders pause.
Now they are stuck. You can't deport one million people thousands of miles away. Well atleast she won Time person of the year, so there's that.
Once German women realize they have all been Merkeled, they will change their tunes. You do remember that Hitler got into power on the female vote, don’t you?
There are many solutions. The German people are very inventive. Some of them will be painful. Better for the invaders to self-deport.
Unlike the Turkish migration before which saw young couples move to Germany, this migration is dominated by young males with poor job prospects & even poorer dating options. Whatever your inclination towards refugees that alone should have given Merkel & European leaders pause.
Now they are stuck. You can't deport one million people thousands of miles away. Well atleast she won Time person of the year, so there's that.
One must remember that the million plus ‘migrants’ Germany foolishly took in this coast year alone – and now who they are trying to palm off by threats and bribes to other weaker, poorer EU states – are overwhelmingly strong, young fit men of ‘fighting age’.
It also must be remembered that in toto, there are not, in combination, one million police officers, armed forces personnel or other agents of law enforcement in Germany.
In other words, any talk of ‘mass deportation’ is pure bullshit, unless you want to unleash a bloody civil war.
There were no "leftist factions" in the parliamentary forces. You are missing the religious inspiration of the whole movement, including its most extreme and eccentric splinters. As attitudes changed, later historians forgot what the rebellion had really been about and interpreted it in terms of their own preoccupations with liberty and - later on - class conflict.
“English history is the worst possible place to look for an “egalitarianist impulse”.
The funny thing about an ‘egalitarianist impulse’ is that it is such an idealistic, sensitive, educated and rareified way of thinking that it probably stems from quite an elitist impulse to begin with.
Being egalitarian is in itself quite a ‘classy’ thing to be. It implies that you yourself are giving something up by being that way. If there is no sacrifice in your egalitarianism, then what really is it? If you asked a loser who only took from society why he was a parasite, and he replied ‘because I have a very egalitarian impulse, just one that works in my favour’ it would seem a bit of a joke.
So maybe England did have such an impulse. It was just a very snobby one.
thats wrong. Several North African countries are in the top ten of countries from which most of the refugees came in 2015. Especially the numbers of refugees from Marocco have been rising fast in recent weeks, according to official data. Also lot of Syrians in Germany are actually North Africans with fake Syrian passports.
In several german cities a large group of North African men have made problems with very brutal robbing and stealing, as well as drug dealing, they are almost exclusively refugees. It is much likely that those did the groping in New Years Night were connected to them.
Also alle of those who were checked that night in Cologne were refugees, according to a police officer who was there.
Nobody can know this for sure right now, but its much likely that only a few of those thousand men in Cologne that night were NOT refugees.
The truth is that it was other women and girls who got raped, and feminists don't give a shit about other women, except their immediate family and close friends.
It takes my breath away every time I see the callous indifference of women to people outside their immediate circle. The feminist bleating is turned on only when there is the chance of extracting resources or power from their menfolk, or those of a higher social class. The perps in Rotherham had nothing the feminists wanted to take.
The point of feminism was never the welfare of women, it was always about tearing apart Western Civilisation to break down societal cohesion. Same with LGBT rights. It’s right there in the Frankfurt School and the Bilderberg group and others have been doing their bit to further these goals.
The media won't report it because it messes up their anti-white narrative.
“Quite. The biggest single victim group of the inner city black gang culture are 14 year old black girls. The media won’t report it because it messes up their anti-white narrative.”
I imagine then you have the numbers to back up your claim…
Who has what they want? Who's accessible? Who's vulnerable?
Thirteen- and 14-year-old Black girls are at the top of the list.
WOC are by far the most common victims of rape.
- exogamous marriage practise is enhanced if females are able to move about freely
- endogamous marriage practise is enhanced if females are terrorized into staying at home
so the rise of chivalry might tie into the shift in marriage practise.
The English have always been keen on that sort of thing, particularly under Christian influence.
Of course, as the fifth Bretwalda, everyone was balls-achingly keen not to get in his bad books, even the Welsh. He hadn’t always been a Christian …
[Yes I know, puerile comment...]
I also believe that NW Europeans evolved to favor certain traits - empathy and non-tribalism in particular - from around 1000 to, well, quite recently. I think that this allowed them to work together on a scale that tribal societies simply couldn't match. You combine that ability to work in very large organizations with the technological advances of Europe over that time, and you get one kick-ass force.
Starting around 1500, this potent combination hit on a global scale. NW Europeans ran rough shod over the Earth for nearly 500 years. What a run. However, the moral underpinnings started to erode as the Enlightenment moved toward natural rights and universal rights. That slow moral decline was vastly accelerated with the Great White Civil War (WWI and WWII), which made many white intellectuals question their society and people.
So, you have whites already faltering when technology allows for mass communication and easy travel. Our biological evolution and moral code (universal rights) left (and leave) us wide open to being inundated by the the Third World hordes. The vast majority of whites simply have no psychological defense, especially when our media and academia is controlled by a combination of a bitter outside tribe and the most empathetic of whites.
As the Derb says, We are doomed!
However, I have to believe that some white will make it through all of this. Of course, those whites will be different, far less empathetic and much more tribal. Evolution at work.
I basically agree with your analysis except I think you are leaving out an important reason why psychological defenses are missing in the vast majority of whites. This reason is that white culture has become overly feminized and looks out for individuals and not for society overall.
2) parliament + everyone must be anglican
3) dissenters wanting religious freedom for their groupsDespite being a minority the dissenters made up the core of Cromwell's army - as being disciplined religious fanatics made them more or less unbeatable.After the defeat of the Royalist factions Cromwell tried to make a compromise between Parliament and the dissenter Army but in the end it wasn't possible.And yes a lot of those dissenter groups: Levellers, Diggers, Quakers, Shakers etc were archetypal religious egalitarians that made up one strand that went into Leftism - with the Levellers being most clearly so even by the name.A lot of them moved to the US.(Now I think of it maybe a lot of them moving to the US is why England lagged behind France in revolutionary spirit 150 years later?)(I wonder how many of the founding fathers had ancestors who fought in the New Model Army?)
Thanks for the perspective. Do you think my overall hypothesis makes sense? You can view it in full at tarkmarg.blogspot.com.
Also it’d be nice if you could point me to some authoritative references about the history of England over the past few centuries.
I also believe that NW Europeans evolved to favor certain traits - empathy and non-tribalism in particular - from around 1000 to, well, quite recently. I think that this allowed them to work together on a scale that tribal societies simply couldn't match. You combine that ability to work in very large organizations with the technological advances of Europe over that time, and you get one kick-ass force.
Starting around 1500, this potent combination hit on a global scale. NW Europeans ran rough shod over the Earth for nearly 500 years. What a run. However, the moral underpinnings started to erode as the Enlightenment moved toward natural rights and universal rights. That slow moral decline was vastly accelerated with the Great White Civil War (WWI and WWII), which made many white intellectuals question their society and people.
So, you have whites already faltering when technology allows for mass communication and easy travel. Our biological evolution and moral code (universal rights) left (and leave) us wide open to being inundated by the the Third World hordes. The vast majority of whites simply have no psychological defense, especially when our media and academia is controlled by a combination of a bitter outside tribe and the most empathetic of whites.
As the Derb says, We are doomed!
However, I have to believe that some white will make it through all of this. Of course, those whites will be different, far less empathetic and much more tribal. Evolution at work.
Thanks.
Please try to spread the word. In particular I’d recommend popularizing the word “empathobesity” to refer to this condition because naming a condition is the first step to understanding and curing it.
Well I would have thought that at least in Bavaria (which unlike rotten, leftie-dominated North-Rhine-Westphalia is normally a well-functioning state) police would bring those savages under control, but maybe I was mistaken. But hey, I have no illusions how bad all of this is...I'm one of the sane ones in Germany!
Point taken. I picked Bavaria as the state Merkel might nuke because I understood that it’s less leftist than the rest of Germany.
I’m 1/4 German and find the situation there horrifying. Please stay safe and keep us posted.
In the 1990s the death penalty was also a prominent subject though that has somewhat faded out of view in recent years.
I was reading the English version of Der Spiegel a few years ago and what I presume to be German commenters were very upset about white Americans’ racism toward black Americans. The Germans apparently thought nearly half the U.S. population is black.
In your estimation, do most Germans know blacks are only about 13% of the U.S. population?
Hard to say, but there's definitely the impression that blacks still suffer tremendously under racism...and their supposed plight is seen as central; other groups get very little attention (as do inconvenient facts like black crime rates). Basically it's a view of the US permanently stuck in 1960s civil rights era perceptions...which isn't that different from the mainstream US media as far as I can tell.
It's true that the parliamentary side in the English civil war was far from your standard issue Marxist study circle. But what I'm trying to show is a trend of constant widening of the circle of political power over time, which I'd suggest flows from a egalitarianist impulse such that the plutocrats did not view themselves as inferior to King Charles. IMO these precedents are also a prerequisite to embolden those seeking further expansions of the circle of power.
Incidentally, the parliamentary forces had distinctly leftist factions like the diggers and levellers, who nicely foreshadow the continental revolutionaries of the 18th (French Revolution) and 19th century.
Tark, I know I’m coming from another angle, but Belloc’s sympathetic treatment of Charles is borne out in important respects by Tawney in Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. Tawney wrote that Charles saw himself, and acted, as a protector of the lower orders against predatory capitalism.
As I mentioned earlier, my hypothesis is based on information from public but general sources like wiki, open academic papers and history websites.
Do you know of a authoritative source which gives an in depth treatment of English history over the past few centuries, especially the civil war?
Of course. If they really had the best interests of women (or homosexuals,) at heart, their foremost objective would be to stop all Third World immigration at once. Not all TW immigrants are as bad as Muslims, but they’re all more opposed to feminism and gay rights than whites are.
In the 1990s the death penalty was also a prominent subject though that has somewhat faded out of view in recent years.
As hegemon we can, relative to other lands, better afford to not care much about other lands’ foreign policies.
But even people in the weakest states have no more reason to care about our domestic policy than we do about theirs.
I fail to understand how any German could think that American gun laws affect them in any way unless they or a loved one live in or travel to America.
SJWs then pick up on it for virtue signalling.
Also, from what little I understand, the Germans are convinced that arms stockpiling leads to war...and you know they don't exactly have great memories of the last two.
The media in Europe use things like BLM as anti-white propaganda.
SJWs then pick up on it for virtue signalling.
… everyone was balls-achingly keen…
That must be the first time that that adjective has been used in a comment on chivalry.
On the other hand, that type of ache is precisely the condition that chivalry expects every man to bear without complaint.
[Yes I know, puerile comment...]
There’s the whole ‘these guys are weapon-crazed’ angle.
Also, from what little I understand, the Germans are convinced that arms stockpiling leads to war…and you know they don’t exactly have great memories of the last two.
In the 1990s the death penalty was also a prominent subject though that has somewhat faded out of view in recent years.
They should read the 1832 Virginia law that began “No free negro or mulatto shall be suffered to keep or carry any firelock of any kind…”
It was written by “right-wing rednecks”.
Very impressive on their part considering most of them could not vote.
Also, from what little I understand, the Germans are convinced that arms stockpiling leads to war...and you know they don't exactly have great memories of the last two.
Perhaps with Krauts, it does. All their pacifists came over here.
You’d think with two world wars on their soil (and Belgium’s and France’s) there’d be enough weaponry lying around farms and woodlands to equip a healthy army. I was told by an Eastern European about a farmer in Russia or the Ukraine who had the equivalent of a howitzer hidden in his barn for decades.
You and Dave are answering someone named “ecum”, which sounds like a porn site.
I imagine then you have the numbers to back up your claim...
Don’t be so obtuse.
Who has what they want? Who’s accessible? Who’s vulnerable?
Thirteen- and 14-year-old Black girls are at the top of the list.
Less. Much less, as in not at all.
The event is essentially irrelevant; what maters is the monopoly of the megaphone.
In November 2013, the NYT published a stupid hit piece (which Steve addressed) scapegoating Dallas conservatives for a Soviet Commie’s murder of the President in 1963. They don’t need an event that matches the desired narrative.
Look at Jackie Coakley. Trayvon Martin.
And what are the real lessons of the Nazi phenomenon? Diversity is dangerous. Diversity is deadly. You can’t have genocide without diversity. You can’t have genocide without immigration.
At Nuremberg, the Allied tribunal told us that waging aggressive war was wrong, so at least they got that right for a while, but that’s been tossed by the wayside as the megaphone monopolists have cheered on government aggression against Iraq et al.
«In the book, Cleaver admitted to raping black girls as a “practice run” before seeking white women as prey.» (Wiki)
So it wasn’t about sex. Some enterprising journalist really should wallraff the immigrant sub-cultures to help us figure out what’s going on.
Who has what they want? Who's accessible? Who's vulnerable?
Thirteen- and 14-year-old Black girls are at the top of the list.
Right below them are gay guys in churches attended by Barack Obama.
Also it'd be nice if you could point me to some authoritative references about the history of England over the past few centuries.
Obviously, Tawney’s Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. You wouldn’t consider Belloc’s biography of Charles I to be authoritative, but it is a perspective that fits perfectly within the historical framework. The relevant portions of Graetz’ History of the Jews are crucial, as are David Katz’s books on the readmission and 17th-c. millennialism. And you need to keep in mind what David Hackett Fischer said in Albion’s Seed: travel in the 17th century was faster by sea than by land; thus East Anglia, was closer to the Netherlands than to London.
The history of England from the time of Henry VIII is largely the history of the Netherlands with a bit of delay. The Enlightenment arose in the Netherlands and then crossed over to Britain. See Jonathan Israel and Adam Sutcliffe. Capitalism flowered in the Netherlands before crossing the Channel. Tikkun Olam and Messianism similarly arose in the Netherlands and then crossed the Channel.
When 5371 speaks of “the religious inspiration of the whole movement”, he’s talking about religious fervor imported from the netherlands.
The Puritans produced enough religious fervor and to spare, that’s why some of them had gone to the Netherlands in the first place to escape recatholicisation under Mary I.
Well, Mr. Sailer does have a link to CH. Moreover, I'm told that "real men" adhere to his advice, and that CH assuredly informs his readers that Mr. Sailer is "the real deal". What do YOU think?
Ben Tillman--"Obviously, Roissy is a short-sighted hedonistic fool."
Actually, he would call you a jealous beta for making that remark.
Ha ha. That’s the first thing you’ve written on this blog that was actually worth reading.
Replacements for the broken link in my comment on the history of Indian street male attitudes to white women.
Links are to a picture of an Indian woman staring aghast at a hippie in Goa circa 1970.
Well, Mr. Sailer does have a link to CH. Moreover, I'm told that "real men" adhere to his advice, and that CH assuredly informs his readers that Mr. Sailer is "the real deal". What do YOU think?
Ben Tillman--"Obviously, Roissy is a short-sighted hedonistic fool."
Actually, he would call you a jealous beta for making that remark.
Roissy is certainly very bright but he is utterly degenerate, as are the commenters on his blog.
Ben Tillman–”Ha ha. That’s the first thing you’ve written on this blog that was actually worth reading.”
Usually the things I write about are over your head. I decided to dumb it down for you.
It always puzzles me the way the left, in general, is so keen to assert the nationalistic right of the Palestinian people to live in their hereditary Palestinian state - presumably that much hated 'right' of ancient blood and soil applies in that case - but decries any attempt of European peoples to defend their ancient, ancestral motherlands as the ultimate anathema possible.
At bes tthe left is dumb. Dumb dumb dumb.
At worst, they are disgusting hypocrites.
I completely agree with you. I find more egregious the issue of Sunni Arab oil wealth.
When Sunni Muslim Arabs from Syria are in crisis, the world expects working class white communities in Europe to make giant sacrifices so that the Sunni Muslim Arabs born into millions or billions of oil money can keep their lavish excesses. That is just beyond weird.
This is what it means to be ‘more evolved’ according to so-called ‘progressives’.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3386652/Transgender-surgery-addict-spends-52-000-four-boob-jobs-two-rounds-lipo-150-face-fillers-perfect-female-body-says-wife-standing-her.html
Thanks for that piece of information. I’ll try and look it up online.
As I mentioned earlier, my hypothesis is based on information from public but general sources like wiki, open academic papers and history websites.
Do you know of a authoritative source which gives an in depth treatment of English history over the past few centuries, especially the civil war?
Sorry, didn’t see your other comment mentioning some sources.
http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20065841,00.html
Very perceptive from 40 years ago. I would call this a refreshingly accurate honest feminist perspective on rape. Today’s feminists are deranged monsters compared to Susan Brownmiller
Very perceptive from 40 years ago. I would call this a refreshingly accurate honest feminist perspective on rape. Today's feminists are deranged monsters compared to Susan Brownmiller
Thank you for that interview with Susan Brownmiller. From the perspective of 2016, it is remarkably pragmatic, objective and ideology free.
There is no area of policy debate in the public sphere anymore with that “these are the facts, let’s fix it” tone and approach.
In your estimation, do most Germans know blacks are only about 13% of the U.S. population?
“In your estimation, do most Germans know blacks are only about 13% of the U.S. population?”
Hard to say, but there’s definitely the impression that blacks still suffer tremendously under racism…and their supposed plight is seen as central; other groups get very little attention (as do inconvenient facts like black crime rates). Basically it’s a view of the US permanently stuck in 1960s civil rights era perceptions…which isn’t that different from the mainstream US media as far as I can tell.
At the time I read those comments, I assumed that well-educated Europeans, unlike their American counterparts, based their opinions on facts.
I can't believe how naive I was.
I imagine then you have the numbers to back up your claim...
According to RAINN, white women make up only 17.7% of female rape/attempted rape victims.
WOC are by far the most common victims of rape.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3386652/Transgender-surgery-addict-spends-52-000-four-boob-jobs-two-rounds-lipo-150-face-fillers-perfect-female-body-says-wife-standing-her.html
Words fail me.
It was written by "right-wing rednecks".
“right-wing rednecks”
Very impressive on their part considering most of them could not vote.
The influence from the Netherlands predated the migration you speak of.
Hard to say, but there's definitely the impression that blacks still suffer tremendously under racism...and their supposed plight is seen as central; other groups get very little attention (as do inconvenient facts like black crime rates). Basically it's a view of the US permanently stuck in 1960s civil rights era perceptions...which isn't that different from the mainstream US media as far as I can tell.
Yes, that is The Narrative over here, too.
At the time I read those comments, I assumed that well-educated Europeans, unlike their American counterparts, based their opinions on facts.
I can’t believe how naive I was.
I wonder if Merkel plans to change Munich’s tradional Oktoberfest to a Gropenfest?