The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Masked Mob Violence Sends Pro-Free Speech Middlebury Professor to Hospital
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The NYT today has a pretty good account of the Middlebury Conformist Club’s riot yesterday:

Protesters Disrupt Speech by ‘Bell Curve’ Author at Vermont College
By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE MARCH 3, 2017

… But when Mr. [Charles] Murray rose to speak, he was shouted down by most of the more than 400 students packed into the room, several witnesses said. Many turned their backs to him and chanted slogans like “Racist, sexist, anti-gay, Charles Murray go away!”

After almost 20 minutes, it was clear that he would not be able to give his speech, said Mr. Burger, the spokesman. Anticipating that such an outcry might happen, Mr. Murray was moved to a separate room equipped with a video camera so that Allison Stanger, a Middlebury professor of international politics and economics, could interview him over a live stream. Mr. Burger said the administration felt strongly that Mr. Murray’s right to free speech should be protected and that “no one should have the heckler’s veto.”

Once the interview began in the second room, protesters swarmed into the hallway, chanting and pulling fire alarms. Still, the interview was completed and officials, including Ms. Stanger, escorted Mr. Murray out the back of the building.

There, several masked protesters, who were believed to be outside agitators, began pushing and shoving Mr. Murray and Ms. Stanger, Mr. Burger said.

Genuine photo of notorious Middlebury “outside agitator” Snake Jailbird

“Someone grabbed Allison’s hair and twisted her neck,” he said.

After the two got into a car, Mr. Burger said, protesters pounded on it, rocked it back and forth, and jumped onto the hood. Ms. Stanger later went to a hospital, where she was put in a neck brace.

Mr. Dublois, the student, said he was disappointed. “To see protests, which really developed into riots — which is what they were — was incredibly shameful and embarrassing.”

Is there any video of the attack on Ms. Stanger?

Unlike the Washington Post’s article, which called Dr. Murray a “white nationalist” five times, the NYT used “white nationalist” only twice.

 
Hide 38 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Dr. X says:

    Protesters Disrupt Speech by ‘Bell Curve’ Author at Vermont College

    Wrong headline, guys. Should read: “Heroic Red Guards Defend the People from Bourgeois Professor.”

    Somewhere, Chairman Mao is smiling.

    Read More
    • LOL: Clyde
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    I don't think these antifa or SJW types are intellectual grounded enough to be Maoists. They're just feral rich kids.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /isteve/masked-mob-violence-sends-pro-free-speech-middlebury-professor-to-hospital/#comment-1786812
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. newrouter says:

    “Unlike the Washington Post’s article, which called Dr. Murray a “white nationalist” five times, the NYT used “white nationalist” only twice.”

    I do wish the AP Style Guide would update so that in the future terms such as ; racist, Hitler, white nationalism, whatever – phobia, et al were replaced with the simpler term : heretic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    Newrouter, The NYT and WaPo are slipping here. White Nationalist doesn't have the same impact as Nazi or racist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Cagey Beast says: • Website
    @Dr. X

    Protesters Disrupt Speech by ‘Bell Curve’ Author at Vermont College
     
    Wrong headline, guys. Should read: "Heroic Red Guards Defend the People from Bourgeois Professor."

    Somewhere, Chairman Mao is smiling.

    I don’t think these antifa or SJW types are intellectual grounded enough to be Maoists. They’re just feral rich kids.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Amasius says:

    Strauss and Howe predicted the Millennials would be extremely conformist. It’s too bad they conformed to psychotic Bolshevism instead of something more positive.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Bezos thinks he is too damn rich to notice losses from the WaPo. But whores are expensive – even for a new richie like Mr. Bezos.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. Yan Shen says:

    Props though to the administration for defending the right for Charles Murray to speak. Also, I hope Ms. Stanger is fine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Richard of Melbourne
    Ditto.
    , @gregor
    I wouldn't give them too much credit. It was a pathetic scene. A real school would not tolerate such a level of disruption.
    , @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    Props though to the administration for defending the right for Charles Murray to speak.

     

    You have a very strange idea of what defend means. Defending free speech requires a bit more than simply stating that someone has the right to speak, and then doing absolutely nothing to thugs who are taking away that right. Berkeley "defended" Milo's right to speak, even as they canceled his talk. Colleges need to stop using your definition of defend, and start arresting/expelling people who interfere with free speech rights.

    Also, I hope Ms. Stanger is fine.
     
    Me, too. I'm happy she wasn't seriously injured. But she should still sue the school, as should Murray (who would never dream of doing so).

    But it's only a matter of time before these antifa thugs kill somebody. They routinely smash people in the face with metal pipes; it's a wonder no one's been killed so far.

    And while one guy in the Northwest got away with shooting one of these thugs in self defense, another one is facing the possibility years in prison for simply pointing his gun at a crowd of masked antifas who were menacing him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH7aTp8DsVI

    At this rate, I expect several people to die in 2017 as a result of this kind of stuff.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Arclight says:

    I have noticed that whenever these mobs get going with their chants/accusations, it’s never one specific thing (like racist), they toss in sexist, misogynist, anti-gay, yadda, yadda, yadda. They have to cover all the bases whether it applies or not.

    Read More
    • Replies: @unpc downunder
    That's because the rainbow alliance is in danger of cracking up and they need to reinforce the pretext that everyone on the right is opposed to every group that the left claims to represent. It's also a warning to members of the rainbow alliance that if you deviate from liberal orthodoxy and do a Milo you will no longer be protected by the rainbow alliance and will be at the mercy of minority- hating conservatives.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Olorin says:

    Nothing I’ve seen at IHE yet, but they went into detail about the thugs’ chants…just to make the old Boomer readers feel at home I guess.

    https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/03/middlebury-students-shout-down-lecture-charles-murray

    Not word one about the hospitalized female prof.

    One presumes by the first comment at the link above that she, too, was Asking For It.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. NOTA says:

    Say, I have an idea! Let’s establish the rule that we will decide who gets to speak in public by each side bringing thugs and having them fight it out. How could this possibly go wrong?

    I very much hope they managed to arrest at least some of the thugs who attacked Murray and Stranger. I doubt it, but it would be a good outcome if a couple thugs did some jail time for this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ivy
    If there were too be some arrests, the Middleburyists would be true to form with crowd-think funding for those poor aggrieved, misunderstood thugs. Less likely is much compassion for Prof. Stanger. Future enrollees can anticipate more indoctrination, in the absence of arrests, convictions and public atonement. Hey, sometimes dreams come true.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. “Outside agitators”

    We never will grow beyond the Sixties, will we?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Laugh Track

    “Outside agitators”
    We never will grow beyond the Sixties, will we?
     
    Rather, I think there's a strong desire to recreate the Sixties. With the Humanities Depts pumping out SJWs, I sense a growing desire (certainly over the last 2-3 years) to act out those values and raise a ruckus and kick some ass. "Let's have some muscle over here."

    It also helps that we've been celebrating it being 50 years since the civil rights movement, "but nothing has changed". (Yeah, right.) But it is a little hard to push for socialism these days (Bernie aside), so let's go after racists, sexists, homophobes, et al.

    I lived through the Sixties. Once was enough.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Ivy says:
    @NOTA
    Say, I have an idea! Let's establish the rule that we will decide who gets to speak in public by each side bringing thugs and having them fight it out. How could this possibly go wrong?

    I very much hope they managed to arrest at least some of the thugs who attacked Murray and Stranger. I doubt it, but it would be a good outcome if a couple thugs did some jail time for this.

    If there were too be some arrests, the Middleburyists would be true to form with crowd-think funding for those poor aggrieved, misunderstood thugs. Less likely is much compassion for Prof. Stanger. Future enrollees can anticipate more indoctrination, in the absence of arrests, convictions and public atonement. Hey, sometimes dreams come true.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. ic1000 says:

    Just a month ago at The Volokh Conspiracy, the excellent KC Johnson and Stuart Taylor wrote The path to Obama’s ‘Dear Colleague’ letter.

    On April 4, 2011, the same day that President Obama formally announced his reelection bid, his Education Department, with no advance notice, reinterpreted Title IX as giving the federal government authority to dictate the specific procedures that colleges must use to adjudicate student-on-student sexual assault allegations.

    This “Dear Colleague” letter, issued by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), told all of the more than 7,000 colleges that receive federal money to use the lowest possible standard of proof, a preponderance of evidence, in sexual assault cases.

    It’s been suggested that Middlebury, UC Berkeley, Dartmouth, Yale, and 6,996 other colleges that receive federal money could benefit from a second “Dear Colleague” missive. This one would outline acceptable institutional procedures to counter the rash of campus-based assaults on the Bill of Rights.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    ic1000, Obama and Holder misspelled Dear Comrade.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Sunbeam says:

    This seems really easy to game if you think about it.

    I don’t really have the slightest idea about how jurisdictions work. But the Feds have access everywhere, at least in some situations right? (Didn’t Eric Holder torture this premise a couple times?)

    So basically just have some ringers in the audience and tailing things. The important thing is they are NOT campus police.

    Then just arrest the guys that do this. Just my take but I don’t think they really know what they are doing. Not even at Patty Hearst/SLA levels.

    If I were Soros (or whoever) I’d cool it on this stuff. Too many things could go wrong. And I’m pretty sure if these guys actually are the snowflakes we all know and love, they are going to sing in a way Rocko who works for the mob would never consider.

    Heck, maybe they don’t work for Soros. But there has to be a minimum amount of organization just to get masks issued and such.

    My take is these guys aren’t in the slightest ready to go where this kind of path takes them, even in this country as opposed to others in the past.

    I’d also wager a guess that some law enforcement types watching this from behind one way glass are going to laugh themselves silly if they nab a couple.

    Read More
    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. @Arclight
    I have noticed that whenever these mobs get going with their chants/accusations, it's never one specific thing (like racist), they toss in sexist, misogynist, anti-gay, yadda, yadda, yadda. They have to cover all the bases whether it applies or not.

    That’s because the rainbow alliance is in danger of cracking up and they need to reinforce the pretext that everyone on the right is opposed to every group that the left claims to represent. It’s also a warning to members of the rainbow alliance that if you deviate from liberal orthodoxy and do a Milo you will no longer be protected by the rainbow alliance and will be at the mercy of minority- hating conservatives.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Buffalo Joe says: • Website
    @newrouter
    "Unlike the Washington Post’s article, which called Dr. Murray a “white nationalist” five times, the NYT used “white nationalist” only twice."

    I do wish the AP Style Guide would update so that in the future terms such as ; racist, Hitler, white nationalism, whatever - phobia, et al were replaced with the simpler term : heretic.

    Newrouter, The NYT and WaPo are slipping here. White Nationalist doesn’t have the same impact as Nazi or racist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @newrouter
    I'm into mocking mode: All heresy/heretic all the time!!11!! It is a effin' "death cult".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. @ic1000
    Just a month ago at The Volokh Conspiracy, the excellent KC Johnson and Stuart Taylor wrote The path to Obama’s ‘Dear Colleague’ letter.

    On April 4, 2011, the same day that President Obama formally announced his reelection bid, his Education Department, with no advance notice, reinterpreted Title IX as giving the federal government authority to dictate the specific procedures that colleges must use to adjudicate student-on-student sexual assault allegations.

    This “Dear Colleague” letter, issued by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), told all of the more than 7,000 colleges that receive federal money to use the lowest possible standard of proof, a preponderance of evidence, in sexual assault cases.
     
    It's been suggested that Middlebury, UC Berkeley, Dartmouth, Yale, and 6,996 other colleges that receive federal money could benefit from a second "Dear Colleague" missive. This one would outline acceptable institutional procedures to counter the rash of campus-based assaults on the Bill of Rights.

    ic1000, Obama and Holder misspelled Dear Comrade.

    Read More
    • Replies: @David Davenport
    The NYT and WaPo are slipping here. White Nationalist doesn’t have the same impact as Nazi or racist.

    To NYT and Wapo fans, the're all the same thing. Might as well shorten "White Nationalist' to "White."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Svigor says:

    Hey, it’s an improvement. “White supremacist” used to be the term. Somebody reads “white supremacist,” it’s easy to think “white who wants whites to be the supreme master race.” Somebody reads “white nationalist,” it’s natural to think, “white who wants whites to have a nation.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome


    “white supremacist,” ... “white who wants whites to be the supreme master race.”

     

    As long as white nations have a unique duty to take in the world's migrants that others do not, we are in fact "the supreme master race".

    Anyone who believes white nations posess a "noblesse oblige" to render service to non whites believes the white race is the nobility of the world.

    Angela Merkel believes in white supremacism.

    Netanyahu believes in white supremacism. He doesn't believe Israeli civilization generates enough of a surplus to be able to take in refugees. He recommends they go to white nations who are prosperous enough to afford to support them.

    When a non-white civilization surpasses ours in terms of wealth and quality of life as demonstrated empirically by becoming the new target for the world's economic migrants, then we will no longer be the supreme master race. We can then unbolt Emma Lazarus' poem from the Statue of Liberty and attatch it to the Spring Temple Buddha or Christ the Redeemer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Svigor says:

    I have noticed that whenever these mobs get going with their chants/accusations, it’s never one specific thing (like racist), they toss in sexist, misogynist, anti-gay, yadda, yadda, yadda. They have to cover all the bases whether it applies or not.

    “The two minute hate shall be inclusive.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. newrouter says:
    @Buffalo Joe
    Newrouter, The NYT and WaPo are slipping here. White Nationalist doesn't have the same impact as Nazi or racist.

    I’m into mocking mode: All heresy/heretic all the time!!11!! It is a effin’ “death cult”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Reading that account my first thought was: Shit, this stuff is really getting serious.

    My second thought was the Norman Rockwell painting from 1964, “The Problem We All Live With”, showing the little Negro girl being escorted to school by US marshals to protect her civil rights.

    Why aren’t US marshals being put onto college campuses to protect the rights of Charles Murray, Allison Stanger and the many other victims of neo-Marxists’ violence and intimidation?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
    The title of that painting is subject to interpretation on more than one level (what or who is the problem), although I don't think that's what Norman Rockwell intended.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. @Yan Shen
    Props though to the administration for defending the right for Charles Murray to speak. Also, I hope Ms. Stanger is fine.

    Ditto.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. These “no platform” types are retarded. Don’t they realize we have the internet now?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Alt Right gripe would be Murray isn’t white nationalist enough.

    Btw, how come they never refer to David Brooks, Richard Cohen, and etc as Jewish Nationalists or Israeli Firsters?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Oleaginous Outrager
    Murray loathes the Alt right, so why should they have any concern for him personally? Except, of course, as an example of what becomes of "conservatives" who conserve nothing and pander to the left out of their abject fear of being called a racist: they still hate you and call you a racist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. @Buffalo Joe
    ic1000, Obama and Holder misspelled Dear Comrade.

    The NYT and WaPo are slipping here. White Nationalist doesn’t have the same impact as Nazi or racist.

    To NYT and Wapo fans, the’re all the same thing. Might as well shorten “White Nationalist’ to “White.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. It really shows how deep the rot has penetrated that a violent incident like this would happen at Middlebury College. One expects this in Berkeley or Ann Arbor or at any big state school, or at an Ivy perhaps, but not at a genteel small college in the middle of nowhere in VT.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. eah says:

    pretty good

    Except for some mysterious reason I cannot begin to imagine they mentioned he co-authored ‘The Bell Curve’ right in the headline — wink wink.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. @Richard of Melbourne
    Reading that account my first thought was: Shit, this stuff is really getting serious.

    My second thought was the Norman Rockwell painting from 1964, "The Problem We All Live With", showing the little Negro girl being escorted to school by US marshals to protect her civil rights.

    Why aren't US marshals being put onto college campuses to protect the rights of Charles Murray, Allison Stanger and the many other victims of neo-Marxists' violence and intimidation?

    The title of that painting is subject to interpretation on more than one level (what or who is the problem), although I don’t think that’s what Norman Rockwell intended.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. The university is reverting to its original mission as the developer and enforcer of religious orthodoxy, and the new religion is the Cult of Equality and Minority Veneration. One can express different views but they must still be within the orthodox consensus. Someone like Charles Murray is a heretic from that orthodoxy and he must expect the treatment that the medieval heretic received at the university. Martin Luther got more respect from Charles V at the Imperial Diet of Worms in 1521 than Charles Murray received this week at Middlebury College.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. gregor says:
    @Yan Shen
    Props though to the administration for defending the right for Charles Murray to speak. Also, I hope Ms. Stanger is fine.

    I wouldn’t give them too much credit. It was a pathetic scene. A real school would not tolerate such a level of disruption.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @Anon
    Alt Right gripe would be Murray isn't white nationalist enough.

    Btw, how come they never refer to David Brooks, Richard Cohen, and etc as Jewish Nationalists or Israeli Firsters?

    Murray loathes the Alt right, so why should they have any concern for him personally? Except, of course, as an example of what becomes of “conservatives” who conserve nothing and pander to the left out of their abject fear of being called a racist: they still hate you and call you a racist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Rob McX says:

    Didn’t Murray publicly declare his intention to vote for Hillary? Maybe he thought this gesture would smooth his path on the lecture circuit – a man in his mid-70s wants to earn his crust with the least possible risk of physical assault or intimidation. How’s that working out for you, Charles?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. @Yan Shen
    Props though to the administration for defending the right for Charles Murray to speak. Also, I hope Ms. Stanger is fine.

    Props though to the administration for defending the right for Charles Murray to speak.

    You have a very strange idea of what defend means. Defending free speech requires a bit more than simply stating that someone has the right to speak, and then doing absolutely nothing to thugs who are taking away that right. Berkeley “defended” Milo’s right to speak, even as they canceled his talk. Colleges need to stop using your definition of defend, and start arresting/expelling people who interfere with free speech rights.

    Also, I hope Ms. Stanger is fine.

    Me, too. I’m happy she wasn’t seriously injured. But she should still sue the school, as should Murray (who would never dream of doing so).

    But it’s only a matter of time before these antifa thugs kill somebody. They routinely smash people in the face with metal pipes; it’s a wonder no one’s been killed so far.

    And while one guy in the Northwest got away with shooting one of these thugs in self defense, another one is facing the possibility years in prison for simply pointing his gun at a crowd of masked antifas who were menacing him.

    At this rate, I expect several people to die in 2017 as a result of this kind of stuff.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    Some things worth mentioning about that comparison in no particular order:
    - The Portland incident happened in July 2016, the Seattle incident in January 2017.
    - The Seattle incident was a shooting in response to actual hands on violence. The Portland incident was brandishing a gun in response to apparent threats of violence.
    - The Seattle shooter was Asian, the Portland man who pulled the gun was white (and apparently had some non-SJW online history).
    - There appear to have been no consequences for the Seattle shooter. The Portland man is looking at (from Wikipedia, might want to check references given the bias there):

    Portland police arrested Strickland at the scene, charging him with menacing and disorderly conduct, both misdemeanors.[10] Law enforcement officials then processed Strickland through the Multnomah County Detention Center and released Strickland on his own recognizance.[8] The next day the state added two additional charges of unlawful use of a firearm, a class C felony.[11] At Strickland's arraignment, the judge set bail at $250,000, with Strickland being released after posting the required bail on July 18. A Multnomah County district attorney sought the high bail amount partly based on alleged race-based threats, including harassing texts and phone calls, reportedly made by Strickland at a previous 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting vigil.
    ...
    On February 10 2017, Strickland was found guilty of all 21 counts: 10 counts of unlawful use of a weapon, 10 counts of menacing, and one count of disorderly conduct. Judge Thomas Ryan ruled that he was not threatened by the crowd, as Strickland claimed. He will be sentenced in May 2017.[13][4]
     
    It would be interesting to explore the judge's logic (?) in ruling that he was not threatened. This seems a clear statement of what autres are being encouraged.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Why should I care that virtue signaller extrodinaire Murray got his just desserts from the people he went out of his way to assure he was a good thinker?

    Did Murray say anything when Milo got shouted down in Berkeley? I’m sure he probably thought the “white nationalist” got what he deserved there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  34. res says:
    @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    Props though to the administration for defending the right for Charles Murray to speak.

     

    You have a very strange idea of what defend means. Defending free speech requires a bit more than simply stating that someone has the right to speak, and then doing absolutely nothing to thugs who are taking away that right. Berkeley "defended" Milo's right to speak, even as they canceled his talk. Colleges need to stop using your definition of defend, and start arresting/expelling people who interfere with free speech rights.

    Also, I hope Ms. Stanger is fine.
     
    Me, too. I'm happy she wasn't seriously injured. But she should still sue the school, as should Murray (who would never dream of doing so).

    But it's only a matter of time before these antifa thugs kill somebody. They routinely smash people in the face with metal pipes; it's a wonder no one's been killed so far.

    And while one guy in the Northwest got away with shooting one of these thugs in self defense, another one is facing the possibility years in prison for simply pointing his gun at a crowd of masked antifas who were menacing him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH7aTp8DsVI

    At this rate, I expect several people to die in 2017 as a result of this kind of stuff.

    Some things worth mentioning about that comparison in no particular order:
    - The Portland incident happened in July 2016, the Seattle incident in January 2017.
    - The Seattle incident was a shooting in response to actual hands on violence. The Portland incident was brandishing a gun in response to apparent threats of violence.
    - The Seattle shooter was Asian, the Portland man who pulled the gun was white (and apparently had some non-SJW online history).
    - There appear to have been no consequences for the Seattle shooter. The Portland man is looking at (from Wikipedia, might want to check references given the bias there):

    Portland police arrested Strickland at the scene, charging him with menacing and disorderly conduct, both misdemeanors.[10] Law enforcement officials then processed Strickland through the Multnomah County Detention Center and released Strickland on his own recognizance.[8] The next day the state added two additional charges of unlawful use of a firearm, a class C felony.[11] At Strickland’s arraignment, the judge set bail at $250,000, with Strickland being released after posting the required bail on July 18. A Multnomah County district attorney sought the high bail amount partly based on alleged race-based threats, including harassing texts and phone calls, reportedly made by Strickland at a previous 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting vigil.

    On February 10 2017, Strickland was found guilty of all 21 counts: 10 counts of unlawful use of a weapon, 10 counts of menacing, and one count of disorderly conduct. Judge Thomas Ryan ruled that he was not threatened by the crowd, as Strickland claimed. He will be sentenced in May 2017.[13][4]

    It would be interesting to explore the judge’s logic (?) in ruling that he was not threatened. This seems a clear statement of what autres are being encouraged.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @Oleaginous Outrager
    "Outside agitators"

    We never will grow beyond the Sixties, will we?

    “Outside agitators”
    We never will grow beyond the Sixties, will we?

    Rather, I think there’s a strong desire to recreate the Sixties. With the Humanities Depts pumping out SJWs, I sense a growing desire (certainly over the last 2-3 years) to act out those values and raise a ruckus and kick some ass. “Let’s have some muscle over here.”

    It also helps that we’ve been celebrating it being 50 years since the civil rights movement, “but nothing has changed”. (Yeah, right.) But it is a little hard to push for socialism these days (Bernie aside), so let’s go after racists, sexists, homophobes, et al.

    I lived through the Sixties. Once was enough.

    Read More
    • Agree: Desiderius
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. @Svigor
    Hey, it's an improvement. "White supremacist" used to be the term. Somebody reads "white supremacist," it's easy to think "white who wants whites to be the supreme master race." Somebody reads "white nationalist," it's natural to think, "white who wants whites to have a nation."

    “white supremacist,” … “white who wants whites to be the supreme master race.”

    As long as white nations have a unique duty to take in the world’s migrants that others do not, we are in fact “the supreme master race”.

    Anyone who believes white nations posess a “noblesse oblige” to render service to non whites believes the white race is the nobility of the world.

    Angela Merkel believes in white supremacism.

    Netanyahu believes in white supremacism. He doesn’t believe Israeli civilization generates enough of a surplus to be able to take in refugees. He recommends they go to white nations who are prosperous enough to afford to support them.

    When a non-white civilization surpasses ours in terms of wealth and quality of life as demonstrated empirically by becoming the new target for the world’s economic migrants, then we will no longer be the supreme master race. We can then unbolt Emma Lazarus’ poem from the Statue of Liberty and attatch it to the Spring Temple Buddha or Christ the Redeemer.

    Read More
    • Agree: Desiderius
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Ben Frank says:

    Draining the swamp requires stopping the inflows. Colleges have turned into indoctrination factories.

    Get the Feds out of the student loan business immediately, and make student loans dischargable in bankruptcy.

    Colleges will have to go back to educating students.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. […] simultaneously, masked anti–First Amendment vigilantes assaulted social scientist Charles Murray and professor Allison Stanger (who had offered to […]

    Read More

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?