The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 iSteve BlogTeasers
London Bridge Massacre Open Thread
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.

I hear the Eiffel Tower will soon be surrounded by a glass wall.

I hope St. Peter’s Basilica has extra security. Is that the most famous place in Europe?

 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.

    I hear the Eiffel Tower will soon be surrounded by a glass wall.

    I hope St. Peter’s Basilica has extra security. Is that the most famous place in Europe?

    Not sure that the Muslims would bomb St Peter’s; surely they look forward to the day when they can convert it into a mosque (cf Hagia Sophia in Constantinople/Istanbul)?

    On the other hand, that would still leave the door open to mass shootings…..

    Read More
    • Agree: MBlanc46
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    The enemy is already inside St. Peter's. Anti-Pope Francis has repeatedly called for more immigrants and "welcoming." However, none of that will stop the Muslims from bombing it anyway.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/london-bridge-open-thread/#comment-1893982
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Multiple’ casualties following major incident in London
    Police say they are responding to three incidents in London Bridge, Borough Market and Vauxhall
    ‘I saw a man with a large blade’: witnesses describe attack
    Reports a car collided with pedestrians on London Bridge
    Officers dealing with reports of stabbings in Borough Market
    Reports of fatalities in London Bridge area
    At least two people have been killed and and multiple people are injured after a string of terror attacks at landmarks across London.

    London Bridge, Borough Market and Vauxhall have all been hit in what appears to be a series of coordinated attacks south of the River Thames.

    The London Bridge area is in lockdown after a white transit van ploughed into a crowd of people at speed shortly after 10pm, sparking a major incident. Witnesses reported up to 20 people injured. There were also reports of pedestrians being attacked with knives.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/03/london-bridge-incident-armed-police-respond-several-people-mown/

    Read More
  3. So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    Read More
    • Agree: Daniel H, NickG
    • Replies: @anon
    Only if you bet me that leftists and the media will say this has nothing to do with islam.

    Care for a bit o sharia wif your fish n chips , mate ?

    If we don't allow in millions of "asians" and "mediteranians " , how the hell are we going to get kebabs and asian takeaway ? I mean the recipes are secret , difficult to recreate and totally unavailable on the internet.
    , @carol
    The euros' stupid denial and reflexive non judgementalism shows me just how terrified they are. Speaking out now could get you beheaded
    , @Johnny F. Ive
    The UK will never change its foreign policy and immigration policy. They'll probably use it to push even more intrusive laws on their citizenry which won't solve the problem. We know through Patrick Cockburn that the UK has aided Libyan terrorist living inside the UK and was well aware of the concept of blowback. If people want change then they need to demand the heads of the people who have aided these people inside the UK government.
    , @biz
    Nothing will change. In fact I'm sure some commenter will be along here shortly to tell us yet again that this had nothing to do with the jihad and martyrdom doctrine in Islam but rather was caused by US foreign policy or Israel or something.
    , @TheJester
    Absolutely right ... nothing will change. There will be more concerts and other public events to express everyone's solidarity with everyone else. There will be public huggings (rather than hangings). There will be gigabytes of tweets offering condolences to the victims and their families with pleas to remind everyone that not all Muslims are terrorists.

    The above, of course, is useless virtue signaling. It makes people feel better about something they will do nothing about. MI5 got the problem right after Manchester: There are already up to 20,000 suspected terrorists hiding within Britain's Muslim immigrant communities ... and it can only monitor and track 3,000 of them at a time. Given the relatively high Muslim birth rate, this ratio will get worse as years go by. In short, it is too late to doing anything about Islamic terrorism in Britain or anywhere else in Western Europe.

    This should have been foreseen ... but maybe not. This is the new European society populated by radical feminists and gelded "cucks" making concrete progress in establishing a New World Order. As a generalization, the anti-natalist New World Order is led by childless feminists and male homosexuals who for years have been arranging, via mass immigration, the intentional atomization of society with the most diverse social and religious demographic they could organize. A permanent but tolerable level of terrorism on the part of Muslim immigrant communities is now de rigueur across the entire continent.
    , @Mr. Anon

    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?
     
    There will probably be an incremental increase in the kind of state repression that is called "Security". Other than that - you are right - nothing will change.

    If we do anything to stop terrorism, the terrorists win.
    , @Erik Sieven
    this is just another incident in a long series of incidents which most likely has not ended yet. So why should anything change?
    , @Yak-15
    I think the biggot British will finally start respecting Islam. It's about time!
    , @Pat Boyle
    I think that things may change. It all depends on the leadership. Many historians think that without the stubbornness of Churchill England would have reached an accommodation with the Nazis. Another prickly British leader may emerge just as Martine Le Pen or Donald Trump did.

    A retaliation policy would not be hard to devise. Simply announce that if there are further attacks British forces will retaliate in the ratio of a hundred to one - or a thousand to one. So if some Muslim terrorist from somewhere kills three people in England then British forces will kill three hundred (or three thousand) Muslims.

    Trump has a list of 'bad' Islamic nations. We could lend that list to the Brits. We would spare some Islamic nations and concentrate on just a few. Then a prospective terrorist who would cheerfully give up his own life would have to judge if his attack is worth the lives of other hundreds or thousands of other Muslims. If the terror attacks continued we could always accelerate the exchange rate. At some point stay at home Muslims would begin to enforce anti-terrorist measures for themselves. They would turn in the terrorists so as to avoid the concomitant bombings.

    Currently there is no price that Muslims have to pay for terrorism. The Muslims are at war and they have chosen to have their battlefields on our homelands. We need to raise the price for terror and bring the battle to the Muslim home lands.

    If terrorism continues or accelerates some policy like this will be inevitable. I don't necessarily approve of such tactics but they seem very likely. Using the example I've used before on similar threads - between the wars nice civilized people everywhere looked with horror on the prospect of bombing civilian cities from the air. But as soon as the stakes got higher the Germans launched the Blitz, the Americans and British launched day and nighttime saturation bombing on the Fatherland and we dropped two atomic bombs on Japan.

    Terror bombings by lone terrorists will be met by fleets of terror bombers. Muslim civilians in the Middle East will eventually pay for the British casualties on London Bridge yesterday.

    , @AnotherDad
    To me the worst of this is not the attacks, the dead and injured.    Death and injury ... that's unfortunate.    But we can tolerate a lot--witness the War.    Millions dead, but at the end England was still England, France still France.   Even Germany, Russia and Poland were still there--if moved a bit West.    Even the Jews--despite being victims of immense mass murder--still existed and in fact shortly had their own nation.    People die, but life goes on.

    No the worst part of this is the crying, the hugging, the flowers, the calls for "peace", the "unity" concerts and candlelight vigils, all the girly, faggy shit that signals that the West is now thoroughly unserious and a bunch of pussies who are going to be rolled and fucked.    

    Death of individuals comes to us all in turn.  (My best years are well behind me.)   But this is the death of nations, the death of the greatest civilization of all time.

    These are depressing times.
    , @dfordoom

    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?
     
    Things have changed already. PM Theresa May has promised a savage crackdown on freedom of speech.

    This is of course something that she has always wanted to do.

    From the point of view of the British political establishment things are progressing very nicely indeed. It helps if you keep in mind that Islamic terrorists and the globalist political establishment are on the same side. Both would love to get rid of this pesky democracy business.
  4. You can tell that Muslims are mostly IQ < 100 and following a holy text. Events like this will ultimately result in their expulsion back to MENA or the afterlife.

    East Asians are more disciplined and willing to wait until they see the whites of their eyes so to speak before doing much other than ensuring Richard Gere never stars in a major movie again. 1.4B of our people should have an ethnostate and then we'll talk about other zones where we'll try the open borders experiment.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    MENA people vs MENSA people. Sadly, for them, MENA people don't have what it takes to be successful in a MENSA world, so they lash out at society. Also, it doesn't help that MENA people, due to centuries of inbreeding, tend to look 'off'. They're not getting much sex from white women, and that isn't helping matters.
  5. And fun. One of their biggest targets is Western concept of fun. The phrase “relax with a nice evening out” is headed to the landfill of cultural history.

    Read More
  6. Seven dead people confirmed.

    “Jihadi terrorists shouting ‘this is for Allah’ kill seven in knife frenzy at ‘FIVE’ locations in the capital: Hunt for men with 12in blades who began the rampage by mowing down revellers on London Bridge 
    The men, ‘of Mediterranean origin’, reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge, then began ‘randomly stabbing people’ along Borough High Street”

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @syonredux

    The men, ‘of Mediterranean origin’, reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge, then began ‘randomly stabbing people’ along Borough High Street”
     
    MMM, how vexing. ‘of Mediterranean origin’.....that could mean anything. Why, they could be Greek, or Italian, or Spanish....
  7. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    Read More
    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome

    First mural at Eiffel Tower

     

    More about the artist:

    Paris Mural Artist Depicts Whites Getting Murdered, Raped, and Enslaved
    ... The mural depicts white and black figures intertwined, in the middle a black male figure looks like he’s having sex with a white female figure. Many of people have pointed out the shape of the figures makes a six pointed star, or the “star of David”. ... The artist Cleon Peterson named his mural, “The Endless Sleep“
    [more works by the same artist shown]

     

    -----------

    Cleon Peterson’s Dystopian (Anti-White?) Future
    vast majority of his paintings depict black figures attacking and eviscerating white figures ... the blacks standing over the soon-to-be white victims are meting out justice ... In many of the paintings the black figures assaulting whites are in uniform — they have the power. ... I haven’t found any where the black figures are being victimized by the white figures ... But a very large percentage of his output clearly depicts white figures being victimized by black figures. The black figures are always depicted as male, but the white victims are often females ... They are dressed alike in any given picture, either in police uniforms or nearly naked in what looks like underwear or a tight bathing suit. ... Mr. Peterson would likely never claim to be depicting a dystopian future where non-Whites have power and use it to mercilessly attack Whites.
    [more works by the same artist shown]

     

    The same artist has his murder/rapist figures holding spears on the sail of Edmond De Rothschild's new sailboat.

    Maxi Edmond De Rothschild unveiled
    ...On Thursday, March 30th, the Gitana Team invited the press to the Palais de Tokyo to mark the official launch of Maxi Edmond de Rothschild, a "giant" 32 metres long by 23 metres wide

     

  8. from the daily mail’s coverage:

    Police have responded … telling people ‘you must run, hide and tell‘, Scotland Yard said.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4569638/Car-ploughs-20-people-London-Bridge.html#ixzz4izMqc8PE

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Maiden has more divisions than May.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVceoX-pX0I
  9. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Europe has voted for suicide. The population had its spirit beaten down by vicious anti-White “elites”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    The population had a chance to stop the madness in France and they elected the traitorous bastard Macron. The people who choose to be manipulated by their hostile elites deserve the hells they have brought on themselves.

    When will the Anglo-Saxon begin to hate?
    , @Mika-Non
    Audio-visual propaganda in the form of MSM entertainment / information is unsurpassed in its ability to sway the masses. Not for nothing is the stranglehold maintained at all costs.
    , @anon

    Europe has voted for suicide.
     
    No they didn't.

    They are being manipulated into what is effectively a stealth genocide by a corrupted political-media class.

    If it was suicide the media and politicians wouldn't have to lie about and cover up the negative consequences of mass immigration.
  10. Compare how the Brits dealt with IRA terrorists and now vs. Islamoterrorists. Brits are doomed unless they wake the F up

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Magarac

    Compare how the Brits dealt with IRA terrorists and now vs. Islamoterrorists.
     
    If by "the Brits" you mean their ruling class, the difference is easy to comprehend.

    The IRA was a threat to their power and the present wave of Muslim terrorism is not. Which also explains why they want the proles to get used to it.
  11. The biggest problem with all these terrorist attacks is that they might get people to thinking that diversity and multiculturalism are not strengths. Then where would we be?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    I agree. As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.
    , @Random Dude on the Internet
    Rest assured that as we speak Scotland Yard has their priorities in order by combing through social media to arrest anyone making mean tweets regarding this event.
  12. St. Peters had pretty stout security last year. It took maybe forty minutes to work through the check points. Suicide bombers would find it hard, I would guess. There were bag checks (and metal detectors, as I recall.) There would be other ways to carry out a terrorist act, however, and not much could be done about it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Walls don't work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.
    , @Dutch Boy
    The Swiss Guards are no joke.
  13. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @rw95
    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    Only if you bet me that leftists and the media will say this has nothing to do with islam.

    Care for a bit o sharia wif your fish n chips , mate ?

    If we don’t allow in millions of “asians” and “mediteranians ” , how the hell are we going to get kebabs and asian takeaway ? I mean the recipes are secret , difficult to recreate and totally unavailable on the internet.

    Read More
    • LOL: rw95
    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
    It's worse than a sane person can even imagine or lampoon. I'm already getting whiffs of prog propaganda that these attacks have been staged by the Tories to influence tomorrow's election.
    , @Frau Katze
    Not to mention the cultural appropriation if whites tried to cook Asian food. It's just not acceptable!
  14. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    WHAT? The first news website I visit in my daily routine is unz. Is there another terrorist attack in London?

    Read More
    • Replies: @El Dato
    My thoughts exactly.

    Actually I was planning on reading more on Oliver Stone's interview with Putin later in the day, but for now I ... must ... fight ... ants in the house.

    (My name is not Leiningen)
  15. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    They attack on multiple fronts.

    Read More
  16. The UEFA Champions League final was happening in Cardiff at about the same time, and the broadcasters emphasized the extra security measures taken for it. Could the authorities have had a vague idea that something was afoot in Britain? Were the usual London security forces diverted to Cardiff?

    By the way, St. Peter’s Basilica was sacked by Muslims once in the ninth century.

    Read More
  17. Anon says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    In a month starts the tour de france. It’s actually the perfect target for terrorists. Watched live by millions ans no real distance to the riders.
    I think it’s just a matter of time before someone blows up live on tv.

    Read More
  18. This is very shocking. I thought U.K Muslims would answer the call of Katy Perry and other pop stars to “come together”. I thought Trump calling last week’s Muslim terrorist attacker an “evil loser” would have sent other would be Muslim terrorists into permanent hiding.

    I guess it’s back to the drawing board.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    I thought Trump calling last week’s Muslim terrorist attacker an “evil loser” would have sent other would be Muslim terrorists into permanent hiding.
     
    One type of jihadist are people who have screwed up their lives - petty crime, prison etc - so "loser" might be accurate but saying it bigly will trigger them - important to recognize that aspect of their motivation but don't say it publicly, just incorporate it into analysis.

    The critical part isn't that - every population has "losers" - the critical point is the religion says you can gain *redemption* from loserdom if you die while killing non-Muslims.

    That's why non-Muslim "losers" convert in prison and go on jihad - the religion offers redemption through killing.

    Obviously most people want a quiet life so *most* Muslims ignore that part but it's there - that's the critical factor and the media-political class have been lying about it since 9/11.
  19. Scotland Yard have issued an urgent call for Davide Martello to wheel his piano to London Bridge

    Read More
    • LOL: BB753
    • Replies: @dr kill
    John Kerry and James Taylor are much more effective. Ever see a terror attack in MA?
  20. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anonym
    You can tell that Muslims are mostly IQ < 100 and following a holy text. Events like this will ultimately result in their expulsion back to MENA or the afterlife.

    East Asians are more disciplined and willing to wait until they see the whites of their eyes so to speak before doing much other than ensuring Richard Gere never stars in a major movie again. 1.4B of our people should have an ethnostate and then we'll talk about other zones where we'll try the open borders experiment.

    MENA people vs MENSA people. Sadly, for them, MENA people don’t have what it takes to be successful in a MENSA world, so they lash out at society. Also, it doesn’t help that MENA people, due to centuries of inbreeding, tend to look ‘off’. They’re not getting much sex from white women, and that isn’t helping matters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Don't get cocky, MENSA. It's your autistic security policies that got us in this mess.
    , @Anonym
    They don't generally have what it takes to get a conventional job around the median income. The definition of success is different. They are successful at getting income from welfare, crime and grooming white girls. They are successful at creating no-go zones for police. Their incipient attempts at colonizing appear successful.

    However, once whites are pushed into a condition of war economy and war propaganda "the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim" etc. the organizational strengths, intelligence and dedication of whites will be a force to be reckoned with. I suspect within a generation we will be at that point.

    , @Daniel H
    MENSA people have no advantage in the struggle for survival. Mother nature has her own priorities in sorting out winners and losers. I'm a pessimist. I think MENA and continental African peoples have the competitive advantage.
  21. Well, judging from the comments at this and some other web sites, the fears of a backlash that will follow this terror attack, that the muslim community expressed last week, were fully justified!

    The only way I see to improve the situation is to somehow achieve an increase in frequency of these attacks, so that the authorities can make statistical predictions: “For this weekend, we forecast between seven and ten mass stabbings and three to five bombings, with total body count in the low eighties. Have a safe and pleasant weekend!”

    Read More
  22. I have wondered for some time now if there would be anything that would change peoples minds, by that I mean that this will not lead to the very predictable hashtags, the usual “we must fight them with love and tolerance” and letting in even more immigrants. I hate to say it, but I don’t think anything will change peoples minds. They could attack the Economist or the BBC and slaughter the entire senior staff and the people that take over will still say exactly the same. They could launch daily attacks that kill hundreds every day and they will say exactly the same. I even believe that a nuclear attack on some city in Europe would not change their minds.

    The problem is clearly not radical Islam, but radical liberalism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @gcochran
    "They could attack the Economist or the BBC and slaughter the entire senior staff and the people that take over will still say exactly the same."

    It's worth a try.
    , @jesse helms think-alike
    correct

    the enemy within is the only real obstacle to eliminating this problem

    a self confident united western civilization such as existed before the 60's would crush islam(ic extremism) as soon as yesterday if it had the will to do so.

    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."
    Cicero

    , @lavoisier
    True. The bogeyman we face is always portrayed as the Muslim fanatic, as if we were powerless to defeat these primitive monsters.

    We could mop up these primitives in a fortnight--nothing too violent--just deport the lot of them back to their ancestral kingdoms, were it not for the bloody fool liberal goodwhites who always stand in the way of doing what is reasonable to save one's civilization.

    They are the true enemy of Western Civilization, and they must be defeated if we have any hope to survive.

    , @Mika-Non
    Well, we'd look at the bright side, now wouldn't we. A European city or two being nuked would create more living space for third-world immigrants. Win-win!
    , @anon

    The problem is clearly not radical Islam, but radical liberalism.
     
    If that was true the media-political class wouldn't have to cover up the rape jihad sweeping over Europe.

    "liberalism" aka the weighted average result of eurowhite genetics does have an inherent moral calculus but that calculus is being consciously fed false data by the politicians and the media.
    , @AnotherDad

    The problem is clearly not radical Islam, but radical liberalism.
     
    Thank you neutral.

    Yeah, I get so sick of all the nonsense about how this or that--"refugees", "illegals", "terrorism", "immigration"--is overwhelming and can't be fixed by the West.

    It's all utter nonsense. The refugee and illegal stuff is absolutely trivial. But none of it, even repatriation, is the least bit technically difficult for the West.

    Muzzies are just a nuisance--like the antics of adolescent boys. The entire problem is the ideological cancer of leftism, "tolerance", "open society" globalism, minoritarianism. Defeat those and the technical problems of enforcing borders and sending back the riff-raff and thus restoring Western nations is straightforward.
  23. terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” – London Mayor Sidiq Kahn the last time this happened.

    UK General Election 6/8 or is it 8/6.

    Searching for 3 men with 12 inch blades.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    https://twitter.com/mayoroflondon/status/729986957984534528
  24. Steve,

    The fact that they have hit London Bridge once again shows that there is NO place to hide in London for the native populace, or for that matter anyplace in greater Europe!

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    The fact that they have hit London Bridge once again shows that there is NO place to hide in London for the native populace
     
    Most of the native populace have already been cleansed over the last 20 years by low level versions of this kind of attack which the media managed to cover up because they occurred in blue collar areas out of the public eye.

    The irony is most of the natives left in London are the people responsible - the private sector wealthy and government worker SJWs.
  25. You racists!, check Ms. Mensch’s twitter if you want to know how enlightened people react after one of these “incidents”

    Louise Mensch‏
    Verified account
     @LouiseMensch 2h
    2 hours ago

    My dear Muslim brothers and sisters in the UK, I stand with you tonight and every night in friendship and patriotism. #LondonBridge

    More
    Let me be plain. The United Kingdom is 100% comfortable being a tolerant diverse nation. Muslim Britons are our friends and neighbors.

    More
    We can see what @PutinRF is doing. It kills him that we do not care to ostracise our Muslim compatriots. Not now. NOT EVER. #LondonBridge

    Read More
    • Replies: @neutral

    We can see what @PutinRF is doing. It kills him that we do not care to ostracise our Muslim compatriots.
     
    Do the liberals that follow this women know how deranged she is, conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones might not be everyones cup of tea, but at least he tries to tie his ideas to real world things, she just makes stuff up. Going to @PutinRF there is not a mention of this event, looking at whats there is just standard meetings with other heads of states.
    , @guest
    Why in the name of Cosmic Pete did it take her three tweets to mention Russia? She's slipping.
    , @Regina Phalange
    My dear Muslim brothers and sisters in the UK, I stand with you tonight and every night in friendship and patriotism. #LondonBridge

    Except those of you wearing bulky vests with lots of little wires poking out. Then I'm gonna stand waaaaaaay over here. #dontwanttogetexploded

    , @ben tillman
    Mensch's Twitter feed reads like a parody. "Putin hacked the election.... Hacked voter databases."

    What does that even mean?
  26. “It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.

    I hear the Eiffel Tower will soon be surrounded by a glass wall.

    I hope St. Peter’s Basilica has extra security. Is that the most famous place in Europe?”

    A similar thought actually occurred to me today as I was reading a travel magazine on holiday deals to Europe before the attack happened. If people visit Europe to experience European culture , that would obviously mean people want to see European people to get a better appreciation and understanding of that culture. Why doesn’t the tourist industry start lobbying for sensible immigration and foreign security policies that would preserve European demographic hegemony? Of course European countries still have mostly 80-85 percent plus majorities, but in Paris I hear even the central city is experiencing Islamification and Africanization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    My nephews found a super cheap trip to Paris right after the Bataclan massacre. But they said Paris was kind of grimy with all the migrants sitting everywhere. You get what you pay for...
    , @European-American

    Why doesn’t the tourist industry start lobbying for sensible immigration and foreign security policies that would preserve European demographic hegemony? Of course European countries still have mostly 80-85 percent plus majorities, but in Paris I hear even the central city is experiencing Islamification and Africanization.
     
    The problem is it's like a virus with a very long delay. Sure, if you go to the wrong place or look at the wrong thing or think the wrong thought, the demographics are alarming. But if you watch French TV, entertainment, politics, etc. the people you see are all white. So why be alarmed? Nothing is changing at all when you watch TV.

    It's pretty hilarious, really. The usual white people endlessly discussing among themselves the problems of racism, the banlieue, and so on.

    Yeah the tourist industry may be among the first aware there's a problem... But it's hard to convince people and change things when the problem is invisible.

    , @Anon
    My wife likes to travel in Europe and I am an indulgent husband, so we go to parts or Europe not yet transformed. We did a final trip to see the Louvre about 5 years ago, and now if we go to France it is to resorts and restaurants in the countryside. As for urban travels we will stick to Hungary, Slovakia, etc.
    , @anon

    Why doesn’t the tourist industry start lobbying for sensible immigration and foreign security policies that would preserve European demographic hegemony?
     
    Same reason as everything else - if they did it publicly they'd be destroyed by the traitor media-political class.

    They might be doing it privately.
    , @Bill B.
    I've had several Thais and Singaporeans in recent months ask me why London (an iconic city in their eyes) has so many "Indians" and "(words probably best not written here)"and "Why would the British do that?"
  27. @BB753
    Seven dead people confirmed.


    "Jihadi terrorists shouting 'this is for Allah' kill seven in knife frenzy at 'FIVE' locations in the capital: Hunt for men with 12in blades who began the rampage by mowing down revellers on London Bridge 
    The men, 'of Mediterranean origin', reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge, then began 'randomly stabbing people' along Borough High Street"

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html

    The men, ‘of Mediterranean origin’, reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge, then began ‘randomly stabbing people’ along Borough High Street”

    MMM, how vexing. ‘of Mediterranean origin’…..that could mean anything. Why, they could be Greek, or Italian, or Spanish….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    German police crime blotters go with "men of Southern appearance".
    , @e
    One witness described the men as "of Mediterranean or Asian colouring."

    Yeah, right, Asian. Anything to avoid saying "Middle Eastern."
    , @Sarah Toga
    The French Riviera is on the Mediterranean . . . maybe that's what the "authorities" meant
    SMH
    , @anonymous
    Sardinian separatists.
    , @Expletive Deleted
    It'll be that Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem again. Maltesers, and paramiltaries to boot. Nothing but trouble ...
    , @anonymous
    ...or (hubba! hubba!) MIDDLE EASTERN!!
  28. How long do we have to wait before some idiot Limey politician calls the latest Third-World atrocity “a normal feature of daily London life” or says that we “must fight blind Hatred with bold acts of Love!”

    The sellers of yellow Teddy Bears and pink heart-shaped balloons are rushing to the blood-soaked scene of the crime before the adjoining streets can even be scraped clean of oozing Whitey guts.

    Read More
  29. I think they like either prominent places or tourist places or jewish places or american places or, if the stars are aligned just right, all four.

    I don’t particularly inhabit their mental mindsets or undwrstand what they think they will accomplish (and I assume there is some diversity there as well) but as you’ve mentioned a number of times they do not generally appear to be an impressive gaggle.

    On your suggestion about this general ineptitude I watched The Four Lines about a decade ago and have to watch it again. It was beautiful.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    I don’t particularly inhabit their mental mindsets or undwrstand what they think they will accomplish

    These appear to be rational acts. Why do you see them as irrational?
    , @anon

    I don’t particularly inhabit their mental mindsets or undwrstand what they think they will accomplish
     
    The Koran commands them to attack non-Muslims and promises that if they die while killing non-Muslims they go to heaven.

    (obviously most people want a quiet life so they ignore that part of the Koran - but some don't)

    it's not complicated - the media is just lying about what it says in the Koran
    , @bomag

    as you’ve mentioned a number of times they do not generally appear to be an impressive gaggle.
     
    They are riding a trend that is in their favor.

    Every successful movement in history had it's early efforts described as unimpressive.
  30. Pack them up, ship them out, and demolish their mosques. Until they are removed, the terror will continue. They’re not fit to live in civilized society.

    Read More
  31. Is it too soon to wonder if this drags T. May over the finish line.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lot
    The current polls showed her majority increasing by 20 seats. Corbyn's Labour is fully Muslimist now and doomed.
    , @anon
    The Election was originally about reaffirming Brexit, and May was looking at an 100+ makority, going on the early Polls.
    Since then, Tory campaigning, focused on the lacklustre May, has been poor, and the Polls have tightened.
    Corbyn's response to Manchester has been that it is blowback from British involvement in Middle East wars.
    That's not a bad line, similar to the Ron Paul line, and Labour could form a minority Government by winning another 25 Seats on the strength of it.
    If May cannot respond to the latest events with concrete proposals, rather than pap, she''ll be toast on June 8.
  32. Isn’t it interesting how often when these types of attacks happen the secret police tells us that the perpetrators were known jihadist radicals. If the intelligence services knows that they are dangerous and likely to carry out an attack at some point, even if not in the immediate future, why don’t they do anything to prevent it? Is it simply out of “respecting their rights”, cowardice or something more sinister?

    Read More
    • Replies: @AKAHorace
    Maybe just a problem of numbers. There might be a lot of suspicious characters, a relatively few of go on to commit terrorism.
    , @al gore rhythms
    Mark Steyn did a good article on the numbers of the most dangerous 'extremists' the security services are having to monitor at the moment, and the number of Muslims who similar views but have not been deemed quite as dangerous.. It's worth a read if you haven't seen it. Even a few thousand people is more than the security services can properly manage, so there are many Muslims who are not considered a huge, huge threat that just slip through the net in favour of the biggest, most obvious threats. So a lot of these attackers prove to be people who were on the radar but only just.
    , @anon

    f the intelligence services knows that they are dangerous and likely to carry out an attack at some point, even if not in the immediate future, why don’t they do anything to prevent it?
     
    because we live in a giant media-created lie

    1) the politicians want mass immigration (either because they are bought by the banking mafia to provide cheap labor or because they are idiot SJWs) so for 30 years they have tried to play down the jihadist threat and put pressure on the security services to just keep a lid on it.

    2) jihad is an inherent [part of Islam so there are *tens of thousands* of jihadist suspects - far too many to watch. the only solution would be to deport them all just on suspicion - and not let any more in - but the politicians and media won't allow it

    3) the security services are partly living in the past treating jihadism like previous terror orgs where you watch, infiltrate and disrupt. jihadism is different - it is an integral part of the religion and some small percentage of Muslims will self-radicalize and attack non-Muslims on a consistent and regular basis. it happens everywhere in the world where there is a mixed population.

    tl;dr

    jihadism isn't a terrorist problem it's an immigration problem but the corrupt media-political class won't accept that reality because it undermines the "diversity" narrative

    , @Expletive Deleted
    Because there's more of them than there are of "us" able to do anything about it, without being slung in chokey and our kids handed over to "child protection" (see :- Rotherham etc).
    Only about 20k "known to authorities" are even on the radar (out of 2.7 mill. muslims in England; I make that 3/4ths of a percent; the colony has doubled in strength in the last decade alone).
    Coppers facing regular "austerity" measures, and dwindling slowly.

    Enoch will be rotating slowly by now ...
  33. “Run, hide, tell” say the cops.

    Fine.

    When are we going to stop running and hiding and start fighting back and kicking them out?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    I bet if you try that you'll find out really quick who the bullets are actually for. Hint: Not for Achmed and Mohammed.
    , @Dutch Boy
    Run and hide is good advice in a disarmed country like the UK.
  34. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @syonredux

    The men, ‘of Mediterranean origin’, reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge, then began ‘randomly stabbing people’ along Borough High Street”
     
    MMM, how vexing. ‘of Mediterranean origin’.....that could mean anything. Why, they could be Greek, or Italian, or Spanish....

    German police crime blotters go with “men of Southern appearance”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ben tillman

    German police crime blotters go with “men of Southern appearance”.
     
    Those Bavarians are always up to no good.
  35. The Russians must be behind this, because it makes Trump’s case stronger.

    Again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    You joke but this is LITERALLY Louise Mensch right now on Twitter.

    Blue checkmark Twitter is kind of a sight to behold as the left and right journos are dropping pretenses of "my colleague" and ripping into each other. Surprised at some of the sentiments coming from the Bow Tie Conservative crew.

    I guess they realise the Left doesn't have a plan for what they plan to do with a few million imported <80 IQ fanatics who hate them enough to kill them in painful and slow ways. Some of them are even starting to realise why Trump was elected in spite of all their Never Trump shenanigans.
  36. Feel uncomfortable about the series of unfortunate vehicular jihad events?

    Keep Calm and Eat Your Soy!

    Lawrence of Tribalia echo-chambers collective fear about real clear & present danger:

    Read More
    • Replies: @e
    Does Larry feel that way about Bibi. Bibi believes in walls. Bibi believes in protecting his own. Bibi gets the best deals he can for his own country.

    Larry will never again, evidently, publicly test the diversity and progressive gods.
    , @Mika-Non
    The global system he refers to is the System Which Must Not Be Named.
    , @EvolutionistX
    Clear and present danger to an orderly global system is the entire reason people voted for Trump.
    , @dr kill
    Hahaha, is Richard Quest still on CNN International? They will cut him up first.
  37. Remember when they pooh -poohed the saying “worse is better”?
    It’s looking like worse really is better!

    Read More
  38. I’d say Notre Dame in Paris is more “famous”. St Peter’s is more important, in many ways.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lot
    A huge car bomb left by a group of Muslimas, both Arabs and white French Islamic converts, was found before it exploded outside Notre Dame.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notre_Dame_Cathedral_bombing_attempt

    My 10 year old recollection is that it had almost no security. But closing Ile de la Cite to private cars seems a likely step.
  39. Anything short of a mass roundup and repatriation of the “usual suspects” will merely be a few more steps in the march towards suicide for the UK.

    Unfortunately, the same type of self destructive half wits who denounced and ignored Enoch Powell are still calling the shots.

    Read More
  40. @Buzz Mohawk
    The Russians must be behind this, because it makes Trump's case stronger.

    Again.

    You joke but this is LITERALLY Louise Mensch right now on Twitter.

    Blue checkmark Twitter is kind of a sight to behold as the left and right journos are dropping pretenses of “my colleague” and ripping into each other. Surprised at some of the sentiments coming from the Bow Tie Conservative crew.

    I guess they realise the Left doesn’t have a plan for what they plan to do with a few million imported <80 IQ fanatics who hate them enough to kill them in painful and slow ways. Some of them are even starting to realise why Trump was elected in spite of all their Never Trump shenanigans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

    ...Louise Mensch right now on Twitter.
     
    I just looked at her Twitter. What a deranged lunatic. I have to admit I'd never heard of her, and I don't care to learn any more. If that makes me ignorant, fine. Such people aren't worth paying any attention to.

    Current events are separating the wheat from the chaff.

    The pink revolutionary reaction to our election of Donald Trump, the powers that be freaking out and rolling out their deepest battle plans...

    Our media unleashing perhaps the most obvious propaganda blitz ever seen in America...

    The pathetic response of half our people to barbarians -- and our courts coming down on our executive powers with their unconstitutional iron fist to prevent us from keeping those barbarians outside our gates...

    These things lay bare the evil people, the stupid people, the crazy people. We can see the psychopathic shepherds and their sheep uncovered now.

    Never before has it been so obvious who the useless fools are and who manipulates them.

  41. @Perspective
    "It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.

    I hear the Eiffel Tower will soon be surrounded by a glass wall.

    I hope St. Peter’s Basilica has extra security. Is that the most famous place in Europe?"

    A similar thought actually occurred to me today as I was reading a travel magazine on holiday deals to Europe before the attack happened. If people visit Europe to experience European culture , that would obviously mean people want to see European people to get a better appreciation and understanding of that culture. Why doesn't the tourist industry start lobbying for sensible immigration and foreign security policies that would preserve European demographic hegemony? Of course European countries still have mostly 80-85 percent plus majorities, but in Paris I hear even the central city is experiencing Islamification and Africanization.

    My nephews found a super cheap trip to Paris right after the Bataclan massacre. But they said Paris was kind of grimy with all the migrants sitting everywhere. You get what you pay for…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome


    Paris was kind of grimy with all the migrants sitting everywhere

     

    "Paris Syndrome" spreading outside the fastidious Japanese to a wider population?
    , @Seminumerical
    Still depends where you go. I went to the 5th Arr. after Bataclan. Tiny inexpensive hotel, fantastic food everywhere served by real French waiters. I didn't see a MENA anywhere in nine days except a few sulking on Blvd. Saint Germain and one taking tickets behind the counter at the Louvre.

    I did see four man fire teams patroling with assault rifles, body armour, and paratrooper berets inside the Louvre, and an army truck pulled up on Saint Germain one afternoon and a dozen soldiers jumped out. The officer forbade me to take a photo after I asked politely.

    But then on the plane from there to visit my relatives in Scotland I sat behind a bearded man in a man dress reading Hadiths from a stack of photocopies, and on my way home to Canada I sat beside a woman in a hijab who successfully landed the aircraft by praying loudly besides me as cross winds buffeted us.

    , @bored identity
    Just imagine how Parisian tourist could have felt yesterday while visiting iconic Trump Tower.

    "Sacrebleu, four thousand miles away, and somehow I feel like I'm stiill at home":

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBRr5SjXcAAFiKt.jpg
    , @Mika-Non
    I've been visiting Paris for decades and you could see it beginning back in the mid 1980s. Ten years ago it was out of control ("no-go zones") in many areas, and by now we'd be at a tipping point even if traitors weren't in power.
    , @bored identity
    Just imagine how Parisian tourist could have felt yesterday while visiting iconic Trump Tower.

    "Sacrebleu, four thousand miles away, and somehow I feel like I'm stiill at home":

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBRr5SjXcAAFiKt.jpg
  42. MMM, how vexing. ‘of Mediterranean origin’…..that could mean anything. Why, they could be Greek, or Italian, or Spanish….

    It’s astonishing, isn’t it, the leftist media’s indefatigable attempts to euphemize away the horrific reality.

    Read More
  43. @Patrick in SC
    "Run, hide, tell" say the cops.

    Fine.

    When are we going to stop running and hiding and start fighting back and kicking them out?

    I bet if you try that you’ll find out really quick who the bullets are actually for. Hint: Not for Achmed and Mohammed.

    Read More
  44. @syonredux

    It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.

    I hear the Eiffel Tower will soon be surrounded by a glass wall.

    I hope St. Peter’s Basilica has extra security. Is that the most famous place in Europe?
     
    Not sure that the Muslims would bomb St Peter's; surely they look forward to the day when they can convert it into a mosque (cf Hagia Sophia in Constantinople/Istanbul)?

    On the other hand, that would still leave the door open to mass shootings.....

    The enemy is already inside St. Peter’s. Anti-Pope Francis has repeatedly called for more immigrants and “welcoming.” However, none of that will stop the Muslims from bombing it anyway.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes, Travis
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson
    Agree. Dammit, how do I get an increase in my agree tokens?
  45. I’m attempting to reason with the liberals on Slate by suggesting that countries like the UK follow the example of a Japan or South Korea. Honestly at this point I sound like a broken record both here and on other blogs, but I suspect that large parts of the world could benefit from embracing an East Asian mentality on all sorts of real life issues ranging from education to immigration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lugash
    What specific policy of Japan's or SK's should the UK follow? The UK situation on the ground is vastly different than Japan's or Korea's. Your tiresome 'embrace cognitive elitism!' ? Even if that was a good idea, and the UK establishment embraced it, they couldn't pull it off without letting the trash in. And it wouldn't do anything about the existing trash.
    , @Lot
    Sex-selective abortion in Korea has resulted in a huge surplus of men, who are importing poor brides from elsewhere in Asia. The sex ratio imbalance peaked 25-30 years ago at nearly 1.2 to 1, meaning the effect is most acute right now.

    More than a third of marriages in rural South Korea involve foreign women, and these marriages are more fertile than Korean-Korean marriages. By 2020, about one third of children born in Korean will have a non-ethnic-Korean parent.

    http://apjjf.org/-Andrew-Eungi-Kim/3035/article.html

    Aside from foreign brides, the number of foreign migrant labors in South Korea is growing very rapidly.

    South Korea has been importing significant numbers of migrant workers since the early 1990s. As of the end of 2007, registered foreigners totaled 1,066,273, accounting for 2.2 per cent of the total population. The number of foreigners in Korea jumped 2.75 times since 1997 from 386,972. If the current trend continues, the number of foreigners in Korea would reach 1.5 million in 2012, 2.5 million in 2020...

    A large majority of foreigners in Korea have entered the country with work visas and the number of foreigners with work visas, as of May 2008, amounted to more than 700,000. The 2008 total represents an annual increase of nearly 100,000 new arrivals since late 2004, when the figure was 460,000. Most of those who entered Korea with work visas, including more than 200,000 overstaying migrant workers, have been unskilled migrant workers.
     
    , @Daniel Chieh
    Europe wants to die. She's successfully implementing her strategy. Stop disturbing her.

    To be more exact, the elite seems to have that as their plan and much of the population appears to largely agree. There's nothing left to say, really. The world wars have killed all of the real men.

    Its really sad.There are tons of effective strategies, but none of them are being implemented. The will is wanting.

    , @Old fogey
    Keeping borders secure and avoiding foreign entanglements were political mainstays just a few years ago. Oh, for the good old days! Isolationism is a great tradition when you have fish to your east and west and no military powers to your north or south.
    , @AnotherDad

    Honestly at this point I sound like a broken record both here and on other blogs, but I suspect that large parts of the world could benefit from embracing an East Asian mentality on all sorts of real life issues ranging from education to immigration.
     
    Yeah, you do sound like a broken record.

    Your East Asianism isn't a solution to anything. We who are Westerners like being Westerners--racially and culturally. I'm no more interested in being East Asian than I am in growing wings and flying.

    And frankly the only thing that East Asians are doing better--at this point--is borders/immigration. (And Korea is fast declining in that department.) I don't see any great solution from East Asians on the other aspects of this--the women problem, smart female fertility, eugenic fertility.

    The West just needs to chuck this mind virus--Jewish minoritarianism/globalism/anti-nationalism. Easier said than done. But if we do do it, then we get to be Westerners again which to us is far, far superior than being some East Asian clone.
  46. @RW
    The biggest problem with all these terrorist attacks is that they might get people to thinking that diversity and multiculturalism are not strengths. Then where would we be?

    I agree. As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.

    Read More
    • Replies: @San Fernando Curt
    I will brace with my Islamic brethren and sistren (if it's ok with the brethren having them around), fearfully awaiting the backlash much promised, rarely seen.
  47. DONT CAAAAAAARE

    Let them eat Islam. Europe is dying of self-inflicted wounds that they are stuffing with more of the infectious puss.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    Dear fellow, one simply hasn’t lived until one has bellied up to a halal food truck and wolfed a pastry pocket full of hot stuffed infectious puss!

    Saw it on Bourdain.
  48. @neutral
    I have wondered for some time now if there would be anything that would change peoples minds, by that I mean that this will not lead to the very predictable hashtags, the usual "we must fight them with love and tolerance" and letting in even more immigrants. I hate to say it, but I don't think anything will change peoples minds. They could attack the Economist or the BBC and slaughter the entire senior staff and the people that take over will still say exactly the same. They could launch daily attacks that kill hundreds every day and they will say exactly the same. I even believe that a nuclear attack on some city in Europe would not change their minds.

    The problem is clearly not radical Islam, but radical liberalism.

    “They could attack the Economist or the BBC and slaughter the entire senior staff and the people that take over will still say exactly the same.”

    It’s worth a try.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SteveRogers42
    It certainly is a head-scratcher why elitist Establishment institutions like those are never hit...

    The Bank of England and various pop celebrities' homes seem curiously immune, as well.
  49. @neutral
    I have wondered for some time now if there would be anything that would change peoples minds, by that I mean that this will not lead to the very predictable hashtags, the usual "we must fight them with love and tolerance" and letting in even more immigrants. I hate to say it, but I don't think anything will change peoples minds. They could attack the Economist or the BBC and slaughter the entire senior staff and the people that take over will still say exactly the same. They could launch daily attacks that kill hundreds every day and they will say exactly the same. I even believe that a nuclear attack on some city in Europe would not change their minds.

    The problem is clearly not radical Islam, but radical liberalism.

    correct

    the enemy within is the only real obstacle to eliminating this problem

    a self confident united western civilization such as existed before the 60′s would crush islam(ic extremism) as soon as yesterday if it had the will to do so.

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”
    Cicero

    Read More
  50. @jesse helms think-alike
    from the daily mail's coverage:

    Police have responded ... telling people 'you must run, hide and tell', Scotland Yard said.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4569638/Car-ploughs-20-people-London-Bridge.html#ixzz4izMqc8PE


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86URGgqONvA

    Maiden has more divisions than May.

    Read More
  51. Get used to this. It’s the new “normal.”

    “We must face the fact: the national institutions of the West are now fiercely protective of Muslims and hostile to the native ancestral populations.” – John Derbyshire

    Until that changes, we face the accelerating onrush of our doom.

    Read More
  52. @Jimbo in OPKS
    Is it too soon to wonder if this drags T. May over the finish line.

    The current polls showed her majority increasing by 20 seats. Corbyn’s Labour is fully Muslimist now and doomed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Brutusale
    Really?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4569566/Shock-poll-reveals-Tories-lead-just-1.html

    I know that polling, especially election polling, is suspect in the main these days, but the Tories, like our GOP, have the issue to remain in power for the foreseeable future, but neither can't find their asses with both hands.
  53. @anon
    MENA people vs MENSA people. Sadly, for them, MENA people don't have what it takes to be successful in a MENSA world, so they lash out at society. Also, it doesn't help that MENA people, due to centuries of inbreeding, tend to look 'off'. They're not getting much sex from white women, and that isn't helping matters.

    Don’t get cocky, MENSA. It’s your autistic security policies that got us in this mess.

    Read More
  54. ‘Incident’ rather than ‘attack’ is really catching on for those following the ‘Minimize Islamic Terrorism’ style book.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    Let's start calling them massacres.

    Only five people died in the Boston Massacre of 1770, but that event helped start a revolution.

    We need to become more militant in our attitude toward all the bullshit that's been fed to us for too long.

    Tonight's event was another Islamist massacre of Whites in London. It was caused by open immigration policies, cultural relativism, and political correctness.

  55. @The Only Catholic Unionist
    I'd say Notre Dame in Paris is more "famous". St Peter's is more important, in many ways.

    A huge car bomb left by a group of Muslimas, both Arabs and white French Islamic converts, was found before it exploded outside Notre Dame.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notre_Dame_Cathedral_bombing_attempt

    My 10 year old recollection is that it had almost no security. But closing Ile de la Cite to private cars seems a likely step.

    Read More
  56. That ” Mediterranean ” description was completely bogus and they know it .

    Read More
  57. Here’s the question that I’m posing to the liberals on Slate mindlessly parroting standard liberal talking points that they’ve been fed most of their lives.

    “There have been 3 terrorist attacks in the UK in the past 2 months alone. How far back would we have to go in a country like South Korea or Japan to find 3 such terrorist attacks?”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    If you add the caveat "not committed by the Norks" you'd do some serious time travel.
    , @SteveRogers42
    Japan -- Early 1930's. Political assassinations by Black Dragon Society.
    , @Brutusale
    Other than the funboys from Aum Shinrikyo attacking the Tokyo subway with sarin gas 22 years ago, I've got nothing.
  58. @WR
    You racists!, check Ms. Mensch's twitter if you want to know how enlightened people react after one of these "incidents"

    Louise Mensch‏
    Verified account
     @LouiseMensch 2h
    2 hours ago

    My dear Muslim brothers and sisters in the UK, I stand with you tonight and every night in friendship and patriotism. #LondonBridge

    More
    Let me be plain. The United Kingdom is 100% comfortable being a tolerant diverse nation. Muslim Britons are our friends and neighbors.

    More
    We can see what @PutinRF is doing. It kills him that we do not care to ostracise our Muslim compatriots. Not now. NOT EVER. #LondonBridge

    We can see what @PutinRF is doing. It kills him that we do not care to ostracise our Muslim compatriots.

    Do the liberals that follow this women know how deranged she is, conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones might not be everyones cup of tea, but at least he tries to tie his ideas to real world things, she just makes stuff up. Going to @PutinRF there is not a mention of this event, looking at whats there is just standard meetings with other heads of states.

    Read More
  59. Another London attack. A rock concert cancelled in Germany. YAWN!!! They know what they have do to. It’s what Trump is doing.

    As for pope Frannie, ship him to the Congo or the Philippines.

    Read More
  60. @Moshe
    I think they like either prominent places or tourist places or jewish places or american places or, if the stars are aligned just right, all four.

    I don't particularly inhabit their mental mindsets or undwrstand what they think they will accomplish (and I assume there is some diversity there as well) but as you've mentioned a number of times they do not generally appear to be an impressive gaggle.

    On your suggestion about this general ineptitude I watched The Four Lines about a decade ago and have to watch it again. It was beautiful.

    I don’t particularly inhabit their mental mindsets or undwrstand what they think they will accomplish

    These appear to be rational acts. Why do you see them as irrational?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moshe
    Come on. If you are going to premeditated give your life for an attack that you are not commanded to do by your superior officer and that has virtually no chance of survival... wouldn't you want to actually accomplish something instead of just doing the same thing that 50 other guys did before you while accomplishing nothing?
  61. @syonredux

    The men, ‘of Mediterranean origin’, reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge, then began ‘randomly stabbing people’ along Borough High Street”
     
    MMM, how vexing. ‘of Mediterranean origin’.....that could mean anything. Why, they could be Greek, or Italian, or Spanish....

    One witness described the men as “of Mediterranean or Asian colouring.”

    Yeah, right, Asian. Anything to avoid saying “Middle Eastern.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    In the UK, Asian is what they call sub-continentals.
    , @englishmike
    One witness described the men as “of Mediterranean or Asian colouring.”

    In general, the British don't use "Asian", as Americans do, to describe East Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Malaysians, etc.); it is more a catch-all category comprising Indians and Pakistanis, North Africans and what you call "Middle Eastern". This is probably because our experience had - until the current migrant crisis - mainly been of Indians and Pakistanis because of our links through the former British Empire. Similarly, many (most?) British Chinese came here from Hong Kong rather than the Chinese mainland.

    The witness you quoted may have been evasive, as you imply. But to be fair, he may have had in mind the North African states which border the south of the Mediterranean, especially if it was fresh in his mind that the Manchester bomber was the son of a Libyan family.
    , @Bugg
    King Juan Carlos, Robert DeNiro and John Belushi?
    , @greysquirrell
    @e
    Quote: One witness described the men as “of Mediterranean or Asian colouring.”

    Yeah, right, Asian. Anything to avoid saying “Middle Eastern.”


    They meant Pakistani looking because (in the UK) Asian = from the Subcontinent.
  62. @Yan Shen
    Here's the question that I'm posing to the liberals on Slate mindlessly parroting standard liberal talking points that they've been fed most of their lives.

    "There have been 3 terrorist attacks in the UK in the past 2 months alone. How far back would we have to go in a country like South Korea or Japan to find 3 such terrorist attacks?"

    If you add the caveat “not committed by the Norks” you’d do some serious time travel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    Were the sarin attacks, nork in origin?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_subway_sarin_attack
  63. I just hope none of the victims are patriotic Britons who are opposed to the multiculturalization of their country. I hope the Lord spares them as much as possible.

    Read More
  64. @Steve Sailer
    My nephews found a super cheap trip to Paris right after the Bataclan massacre. But they said Paris was kind of grimy with all the migrants sitting everywhere. You get what you pay for...

    Paris was kind of grimy with all the migrants sitting everywhere

    “Paris Syndrome” spreading outside the fastidious Japanese to a wider population?

    Read More
  65. @Yan Shen
    I'm attempting to reason with the liberals on Slate by suggesting that countries like the UK follow the example of a Japan or South Korea. Honestly at this point I sound like a broken record both here and on other blogs, but I suspect that large parts of the world could benefit from embracing an East Asian mentality on all sorts of real life issues ranging from education to immigration.

    What specific policy of Japan’s or SK’s should the UK follow? The UK situation on the ground is vastly different than Japan’s or Korea’s. Your tiresome ‘embrace cognitive elitism!’ ? Even if that was a good idea, and the UK establishment embraced it, they couldn’t pull it off without letting the trash in. And it wouldn’t do anything about the existing trash.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Brutusale
    According to a June 2005 report by the National Police Agency, Aleph had approximately 1,650 members, of whom 650 lived communally in compounds.[1] The group operated 26 facilities in 17 prefectures, and about 120 residential facilities. An article in the Mainichi Shimbun newspaper on 11 September 2002 showed that the Japanese public still distrusts Aleph, and compounds are usually surrounded by protest banners from local residents.
    There have been numerous cases where local authorities have refused to accept resident registration for cult members when it is discovered that Aleph has set up a facility within their jurisdiction. This effectively denies cult members social benefits such as health insurance; five cases have been taken to court by cult members, who won every time. Local communities also try to drive the cult away by preventing cultists from finding jobs, or keeping cult children out of schools. Right-wing groups frequently conduct protest marches near apartments rented by Aum followers by blaring extremely loud music through loudspeakers installed on minivans.
    --part of the Wikipedia entry on the splinter groups of Aum Shinrikyo, perpetrators of the sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway.

    In other words, a non-atomized society is pretty harsh to violent outliers.
  66. @rw95
    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    The euros’ stupid denial and reflexive non judgementalism shows me just how terrified they are. Speaking out now could get you beheaded

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kylie
    "The euros’ stupid denial and reflexive non judgementalism shows me just how terrified they are. Speaking out now could get you beheaded"

    No, these are true believers. They are not terrified, they are deluded.
    , @anon

    Speaking out now could get you beheaded
     
    Misunderstanding the psychology of it imo - they are more scared of other people thinking they are "racist" aka a bad person, and the media-political class use that threat of *social ostracism* to control everyone.

    When that control mechanism breaks down it will happen overnight.
  67. @syonredux

    The men, ‘of Mediterranean origin’, reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge, then began ‘randomly stabbing people’ along Borough High Street”
     
    MMM, how vexing. ‘of Mediterranean origin’.....that could mean anything. Why, they could be Greek, or Italian, or Spanish....

    The French Riviera is on the Mediterranean . . . maybe that’s what the “authorities” meant
    SMH

    Read More
  68. Europeans are behaving like the guy in that Woody Allen story who fell from the opera balcony, and did it again a couple of times on purpose, just so people would think he was being original rather than clumsy.

    Read More
  69. It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.

    My nineteen-year-old kid is in London right now, visiting a friend and was out on the town Saturday night GMT. She texted me three hours ago, was about half-a-mile away from the incident, and said the usual Saturday night crowds appear not to have batted an eyelid, but to check their smartphones.

    They are made of pretty stern stuff over there, q.v. the Blitz. So also, I’m happy to say, PiltdownJunior1 and friends.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    the usual Saturday night crowds appear not to have batted an eyelid, but to check their smartphones.

    They are made of pretty stern stuff over there, q.v. the Blitz. So also, I’m happy to say, PiltdownJunior1 and friends.


    Stern stuff, eh? What are any of these people doing to resist being displaced from their homelands?
    , @fnn
    The Blitz wasn't all heroism and stiff upper lip:
    http://www.unz.com/acockburn/2014/08/

    Gavin Mortimer, author of The Blitz, had an amusing piece in the First Post about the conduct of Britons at the time of their Finest Hour:

    “It didn’t take long for a hardcore of opportunists to realise there were rich pickings available in the immediate aftermath of a raid – and the looting wasn’t limited to civilians.

    “In October 1940 Winston Churchill ordered the arrest and conviction of six London firemen caught looting from a burned-out shop to be hushed up by Herbert Morrison, his Home Secretary. The Prime Minister feared that if the story was made public it would further dishearten Londoners struggling to cope with the daily bombardments…

    “The looting was often carried out by gangs of children organized by a Fagin figure; he would send them into bombed-out houses the morning after a raid with orders to target coins from gas meters and display cases containing First World War medals. In April 1941 Lambeth juvenile court dealt with 42 children in one day, from teenage girls caught stripping clothes from dead bodies to a seven-year-old boy who had stolen five shillings from the gas meter of a damaged house. In total, juvenile crime accounted for 48 per cent of all arrests in the nine months between September 1940 and May 1941 and there were 4,584 cases of looting.

    “Joan Veazey, whose husband was a vicar in Kennington, south London, wrote in her diary after one raid in 1940: “The most sickening thing was to see people like vultures, picking up things and taking them away. I didn’t like to feel that English people would do this, but they did.”

    “Perhaps the most shameful episode of the whole Blitz occurred on the evening of March 8 1941 when the Cafe de Paris in Piccadilly was hit by a German bomb. The cafe was one of the most glamorous night spots in London, the venue for off-duty officers to bring their wives and girlfriends, and within minutes of its destruction the looters moved in.

    “Some of the looters in the Cafe de Paris cut off the people’s fingers to get the rings,” recalled Ballard Berkeley, a policeman during the Blitz who later found fame as the ‘Major’ in Fawlty Towers. Even the wounded in the Cafe de Paris were robbed of their jewellery amid the confusion and carnage.”
     
  70. I’m rooting for the Muslims. They want it more.

    Read More
    • LOL: Abe
    • Replies: @Moshe
    Yes!
    , @Yak-15
    I literally thought the exact same thing. Why am I on a side which fails to care to even fight back?
    , @rw95
    Honestly, at this point so am I.
  71. @Anonymous
    Europe has voted for suicide. The population had its spirit beaten down by vicious anti-White "elites".

    The population had a chance to stop the madness in France and they elected the traitorous bastard Macron. The people who choose to be manipulated by their hostile elites deserve the hells they have brought on themselves.

    When will the Anglo-Saxon begin to hate?

    Read More
    • Agree: Travis
    • Replies: @Kevin C.

    When will the Anglo-Saxon begin to hate?
     
    Increasingly, it's looking like the answer is "never". Or, if not that, then "when he's already hopelessly outnumbered and overrun".
    , @Parbes
    Oh but the Anglo-Saxons DO hate - they hate Russians, Chinese, Eastern Europeans, secular pro-Assad Syrians etc., with an understated passion... Just as programmed by their mind-controllers.
    , @Joe Schmoe



    When will the Anglo-Saxon begin to hate?
     
    The strong, fit, able bodied were rounded up and used as cannon fodder in the last two world wars. Just as Napoleon devastated the French gene pool, so did the rest of Europe in the world wars. All the cowards who didn't enlist got the girls, and we now have their descendants. Europeans should have set their sights on foreign continents rather than Europe.
  72. If there’s only any existing surveillance technology, or some other method, to help Our governments to distinguish Vehicular Blade Running Mediterraneans and other Sharia Lawn Mowing Types from the rest of population:

    https://youtu.be/lqlrru1V69E

    https://youtu.be/d0Dq_2RQEwE

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Read More
  73. The eiffel tower is the most famous place in europe, not st. peters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @al gore rhythms
    "The eiffel tower is the most famous place in europe, not st. peters"

    That's probably true, and quite an achievement in a continent with so many important, beautiful and historic buildings. I wonder why it would be the Eiffel Tower, rather than St Paul's, St Peter's, the Parthenon?

    It certainly has a shape which means it couldn't be mistaken for anything else.
  74. @rw95
    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    The UK will never change its foreign policy and immigration policy. They’ll probably use it to push even more intrusive laws on their citizenry which won’t solve the problem. We know through Patrick Cockburn that the UK has aided Libyan terrorist living inside the UK and was well aware of the concept of blowback. If people want change then they need to demand the heads of the people who have aided these people inside the UK government.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Parbes
    Precisely! Finally an intelligent comment on this thread.
  75. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @George
    terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” - London Mayor Sidiq Kahn the last time this happened.

    UK General Election 6/8 or is it 8/6.

    Searching for 3 men with 12 inch blades.
    Read More
  76. When you guys bash Islam you are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non Muslims.

    We are going to get mass immigration anyway so it is better that it be Islamic because Muslims alienate the public so much more. Also Muslims are much more of a threat to Globalism than any of us will ever be.

    Read More
    • Replies: @yaqub the mad scientist
    When you guys bash Islam you are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non Muslims.

    WTF are you talking about? Do you even read this site? Most of the people here want a halt or severe curtailing of all immigration, legal and illegal.
    , @anon
    "you guys are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non-Muslims."

    No. Mass immigration is NOT "fine" at all. And immigration of Muslims is the absolute worst of all.
    , @guest
    "We are going to get mass immigration anyway so it is better that it be Islamic because Muslims alienate the public so much more"

    Which you're hoping leads to what? Ethnic cleansing?

    "Also Muslims are much more of a threat to Globalism than any of us will ever be"

    Okay, then Muslims kill and/or push out the globalists, and America is preserved. As a Muslim nation? Is that the plan?

    , @unpc downunder
    These Muslim terrorists are pushing their own form of globalism - a global Islamic caliphate. It's a war between two globalisms, and were stuck in the Middle, like Poland in WWII.
    , @Pericles
    You're that crazy Jew who fancies himself a political analyst, aren't you. Go hit on Louise Mensch, you'd make a perfect couple.
    , @Hyperborean
    I'm not so convinced that Muslim immigrants in Europe are that much of a threat to "Globalism" as you think. Most Muslims who I've encountered in Europe tend to be rather Western in their mindset. It might be "halal-certified globalism" but it is still "globalism", and it is even more prevalent in "youths" who sing expletive-filled rap songs and pretend to be black Americans living in urban ghettos and women who pretend to be "Islamic virgins" simply because they wear a hijab even though their heavy makeup and tight clothing that leaves little to the imagination makes one think of courtesans. At least their parents behave in a comparatively decent manner (once you factor out their on-average lower IQ and higher societal dysfunctionality). But from judging the quality of people who will grow up to be "Europe's future Muslims" I think "Globalism" will handle this great Völkerwanderung of the southern peoples just fine.
    , @MBlanc46
    There is no such implication whatever.
  77. Based on celebrity photos, holocaust centers seem to be the most popular spots nowadays.

    Read More
  78. No matter how bad the Irish Republican Army was, their past terror attacks do not suggest that admitting tens of thousands of Muslims into the U.K. is a good idea.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    What the IRA terrorism did suggest, was that it wasn't a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century.
    Like the Muslims later on, they never assimilated and remained hostile to British people and their way of life.
  79. @neutral
    I have wondered for some time now if there would be anything that would change peoples minds, by that I mean that this will not lead to the very predictable hashtags, the usual "we must fight them with love and tolerance" and letting in even more immigrants. I hate to say it, but I don't think anything will change peoples minds. They could attack the Economist or the BBC and slaughter the entire senior staff and the people that take over will still say exactly the same. They could launch daily attacks that kill hundreds every day and they will say exactly the same. I even believe that a nuclear attack on some city in Europe would not change their minds.

    The problem is clearly not radical Islam, but radical liberalism.

    True. The bogeyman we face is always portrayed as the Muslim fanatic, as if we were powerless to defeat these primitive monsters.

    We could mop up these primitives in a fortnight–nothing too violent–just deport the lot of them back to their ancestral kingdoms, were it not for the bloody fool liberal goodwhites who always stand in the way of doing what is reasonable to save one’s civilization.

    They are the true enemy of Western Civilization, and they must be defeated if we have any hope to survive.

    Read More
  80. In the U.S., you’d think another terrorist attack would make people more inclined to vote for conservatives. In the U.K., bettors seem to think it will have the opposite effect in the upcoming snap election. Maybe anti-incumbency?
    https://twitter.com/dpinsen/status/871162622720307200

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Could be something to do with May having been blasé about police cuts (police states are a good thing now that they hide the true violence of diversity from the public) and Corbyn getting his trendy talking points together: that we destabilized the Middle East, letting jihadism flourish there, which has blown back on us, because "British" Muslims have no agency and must join every jihadist movement that pops up wherever it pops up, and we couldn't possibly stop letting them in in the first place.
    , @Lot
    Am I missing something here?

    Corbyn now up to 19% to be PM on June 30. Current polls show Tories expect to pad on another net 40 seats on top of their current ~100 seat lead over Labour. Polls routinely understate Tory support. In the very unlikely event of no Tory majority, the minor parties hate Corbyn and would coalition only with their own PM or a non-Corbyn from either major party.
    , @jesse helms think-alike

    n the U.S., you’d think another terrorist attack would make people more inclined to vote for conservatives. In the U.K., bettors seem to think it will have the opposite effect in the upcoming snap election. Maybe anti-incumbency?
     
    Unfortunately lady Conservatives just like lady Republicans in the US have absorbed the "compassionate conservative" ideal. Their goals are indistinguishable from those of the Left but they fight to achieve those goals a bit more slowly, with some empty talk of fiscal responsibility and tax cuts thrown in to fool the rubes.

    Look at Elizabeth Dole who converted Jesse Helms' safe senate seat to Dem in just one term.
    Look at Nimrata Haley who as SC governor rushed to tear down any confederate flag within reach before the left even had a chance to bus in BLM rent-a-mobs.

    Marine LePen, the last rightwing hope for France was a similar disappointment, disavowing membership in her own party before the election in order to curry favor with people who hate her.

    Why would May, a dim non-entity who backed into the Prime Ministership through no skill or talent of her own be any different? talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory
    , @anon
    it ought to be anti-incumbency as modern "conservatives" aren't - they're whores for the cheap labor lobby and just as bad on immigration as SJWs

    the big problem is trust - too many people just can't get their head around the fact the entire media-political class is betraying them
  81. @RW
    The biggest problem with all these terrorist attacks is that they might get people to thinking that diversity and multiculturalism are not strengths. Then where would we be?

    Rest assured that as we speak Scotland Yard has their priorities in order by combing through social media to arrest anyone making mean tweets regarding this event.

    Read More
  82. I hope no one in the UK takes advantage of this tragedy to post naughty things on social media while the police are temporarily otherwise occupied.

    Read More
    • Replies: @a reader
    Regrettably, a German lady failed to heed your advice and forwarded a hateful joke about refugees on her Facebook account.

    The case was quickly dealt with.
    , @a reader
    Too late!

    The islamophobic plague spreads all over Europe, it seems.
  83. I wonder when someone in the public eye is going to compare the snowflake response from the Metropolitan Police of London (Run! Hide! Tell!) to the way things were done back in the day in both Scotland and England/Wales…

    Compulsory weapons practice so ordinary people could deal confidently with potential threats to the common weal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SteveRogers42
    Well, at least the Bobbies are practicing what they preach:

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/london-citizens-throw-chairs-terrorists-unarmed-police-ran-away/
    , @Expletive Deleted
    Like this?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-2KLuAH4GY
    one of the incentives offered in ye olden dayes was at least a quart of free ale after. Got beaten out as a village pastime by cricket (allows more ale), and the accursed leathren sphere (allows more fighting).
  84. Steve,
    How do you make it through the day with so many topics? You must feel like Cassandra at times, trying to warn people and not getting enough to recognize what is so evident.
    Respectfully ,
    Ivy

    Read More
  85. I’m uh only being partly facetious here, but another one of my favorite sayings is WWLKYD (What Would Lee Kuan Yew Do)? Maybe comparing Japan or South Korea to a country like the UK isn’t quite apples to apples given that the former are much more homogeneous today.

    But look at a country like Singapore. Yeah I suppose it’s a tiny nation state, but still. For most of its history, it’s basically been 3/4 Chinese and 1/4 non-Chinese, which to be honest isn’t that different from many of the “multicultural” Western nations. In fact, the Chinese make up less of Singapore percentage wise than the majority white ethnic groups do in virtually all European nations. Yet somehow the country has managed to avoid the insanity that is political correctness and most of the pitfalls besetting the modern United States and Western Europe. Somehow Singapore made it work!

    I often lament that if only a modern day Lee Kuan Yew descended from the heavens, alas. And really, imagine if the second coming of Lee Kuan Yew were to be the prime minster of the UK instead of a Theresa May. Would anyone doubt that LKY the Second Coming would do anything less than steer the UK out of its myriad of social predicaments and towards the Promised Land? Would anyone argue against the notion that some rigid Confucian discipline could be exactly what the doctor ordered?

    Read More
    • Replies: @PiltdownMan

    For most of its history, it’s basically been 3/4 Chinese and 1/4 non-Chinese.
     
    This is actually incorrect. Singapore was majority Indian until 1948, at least, with Malays and Chinese making up the rest. The Lee Kuan Yew government strongly favored the immigration of Mainland Chinese, without making any public waves about it. The communist takeover of China and subsequent waves of refugees helped change the balance of ethnicities in Singapore. In Singapore itself, history has been retconned to downplay and pigeonhole the role of Indians in its history, to the extent of completely avoiding any mention in their war museums of the presence of significant numbers of the British Indian Army during the fall of Singapore in WWII. This is not surprising if you consider that Singapore was administered out of Calcutta until about 100 years ago, by the British.

    Lee Kuan Yew's views on the strengths and weaknesses of the various ethnicities in Singapore were explicit. He thought Indians made for good accountants and CFOs, but were not CEO material. When an Indian was appointed the CEO of Singapore biggest bank a few years ago, there was openly published debate in the newspapers about Indian managers not having the magic ingredient.

    , @Lugash

    I often lament that if only a modern day Lee Kuan Yew descended from the heavens, alas. And really, imagine if the second coming of Lee Kuan Yew were to be the prime minster of the UK instead of a Theresa May. Would anyone doubt that LKY the Second Coming would do anything less than steer the UK out of its myriad of social predicaments and towards the Promised Land? Would anyone argue against the notion that some rigid Confucian discipline could be exactly what the doctor ordered?
     
    What specific things would PM LKY do to improve the UK? Closing down radical mosques, stopping immigration and deporting illegals? As PM he might get the last one done. What would he do to integrate the 15% of the population that is foreign born? The 5% Muslim population? The black population? More prosaic, what would he do to reduce housing prices and improve the NHS? I know, import a million Chinese cognitive elites!

    You're too enamored with LKY and your co-ethnics. I'm not sure if it's blinding you to the real world impossibilities of your ideas, or if you're just oblivious to the real world in general.
    , @Buck Turgidson
    I lived and worked in Singapore for a year. They have effectively zero immigration. The country is Chinese-led and they allow opportunity and tolerance for the Malays (muzzies) and Tamil (Indian dot) ethnic groups; but those groups also know who rules the roost.

    The Singapore gov't would have zero compunction about razing a mosque and jailing forever anyone who was plotting a terrorist attack, and that is common knowledge. They don't do Chinese guilt and they run the country to make it work for everyone.

    It ain't perfect, I was happy to leave, but they don't put up with stuff like this. The gov't sits on a lot of things and runs a very tight ship, which makes the place culturally and socially sterile (IMO), but there ain't going to be any muzzie 'terror' there. Women also can walk the streets alone at night, etc.

    A student-led protest @ the National University would last about 3 minutes until the cops showed up with pepper spray, mace, truncheons, and the paddy wagon. Singapore is a tiny place and there ain't nowhere to hide.
    , @RadicalCenter
    Singapore does not have any substantial Muslim or African population, nor is it admitting such. Might this be relevant in helping to explain how Singapore "made it work" while Europe has not?
    , @Father O'Hara
    "...descended from the heavens." I think we need someone who has Ascended,muhself.
    , @RW
    You're right Yan Shen. "and in Britain [Lee Kuan Yew] had campaigned for the Labour Party. But for him ideology always took second place to a pragmatic appreciation of how power works. In later life he would rail against the welfare state as the root of Britain’s malaise"
  86. @Anonymous
    First mural at Eiffel Tower

    http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e35/14482313_1765106777112128_4467960250741293056_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTM1MDE1NjIwNTA2MjE5Nzc3NA%3D%3D.2

    First mural at Eiffel Tower

    More about the artist:

    Paris Mural Artist Depicts Whites Getting Murdered, Raped, and Enslaved
    … The mural depicts white and black figures intertwined, in the middle a black male figure looks like he’s having sex with a white female figure. Many of people have pointed out the shape of the figures makes a six pointed star, or the “star of David”. … The artist Cleon Peterson named his mural, “The Endless Sleep“
    [more works by the same artist shown]

    ———–

    Cleon Peterson’s Dystopian (Anti-White?) Future
    vast majority of his paintings depict black figures attacking and eviscerating white figures … the blacks standing over the soon-to-be white victims are meting out justice … In many of the paintings the black figures assaulting whites are in uniform — they have the power. … I haven’t found any where the black figures are being victimized by the white figures … But a very large percentage of his output clearly depicts white figures being victimized by black figures. The black figures are always depicted as male, but the white victims are often females … They are dressed alike in any given picture, either in police uniforms or nearly naked in what looks like underwear or a tight bathing suit. … Mr. Peterson would likely never claim to be depicting a dystopian future where non-Whites have power and use it to mercilessly attack Whites.
    [more works by the same artist shown]

    The same artist has his murder/rapist figures holding spears on the sail of Edmond De Rothschild’s new sailboat.

    Maxi Edmond De Rothschild unveiled
    …On Thursday, March 30th, the Gitana Team invited the press to the Palais de Tokyo to mark the official launch of Maxi Edmond de Rothschild, a “giant” 32 metres long by 23 metres wide

    Read More
  87. You have to wonder if the people are going to start questioning the legitimacy of a government who takes 60%+ of your earnings in various forms of taxes but refuses to protect you when you need them the most. Prior to the immivasion, Europeans were gouged on taxes but at least the government would take care of you. Now they just take your taxes and look away when your family gets blown up, raped, trafficked, etc. I suspect it is an age issue: older Europeans still ascribe legitimacy to the government but younger people are in an era where the government is more of your enemy than your friend. Le Pen did well among young voters. Europe will change course if these young people have anything to do about it but it might be too late when they start getting more power and change course.

    Read More
  88. @anon
    MENA people vs MENSA people. Sadly, for them, MENA people don't have what it takes to be successful in a MENSA world, so they lash out at society. Also, it doesn't help that MENA people, due to centuries of inbreeding, tend to look 'off'. They're not getting much sex from white women, and that isn't helping matters.

    They don’t generally have what it takes to get a conventional job around the median income. The definition of success is different. They are successful at getting income from welfare, crime and grooming white girls. They are successful at creating no-go zones for police. Their incipient attempts at colonizing appear successful.

    However, once whites are pushed into a condition of war economy and war propaganda “the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim” etc. the organizational strengths, intelligence and dedication of whites will be a force to be reckoned with. I suspect within a generation we will be at that point.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bomag

    However, once whites are pushed into a...
     
    Seems like a wane hope. The point of intelligence and civilization is to see far enough ahead to avoid needing that kind of emotional disaster to elicit action.

    If a people are so pathologically altruistic, or so easily fooled, that looks to be fatal flaw that an angry push back won't overcome.

  89. Time to start mocking these Euros for their cowardice.
    After all, wouldn’t you start mocking a man who’s wife has affair after affair and he doesn’t have balls enough to divorce her?
    Same thing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome


    wouldn’t you start mocking a man who’s wife has affair after affair and he doesn’t have balls enough to divorce her?

     

    But what if before, a few years ago when he tried to divorce her and you went to his house and beat him to a pulp and burned his house down and said "if you ever try to divorce her again, I will come back and do it again." In addition, every day you say he must write on a provided chalkboard an apology for trying to divorce her. Then you start writing books every year about the divorce attempt and make him buy and read them. Then you hire a secrity guard to live in his house to keep an eye on things. If he shows any sings of disrepect to his wife, the guard will make him spend a day in the doghouse to keep him in line. Then you mock him.
    , @SteveRogers42
    Gotcha covered:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dKpHtc9F9M
  90. Nothing will change. Flowers, vigils, Facebook profile changes, rinse and repeat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    UNICEF ‘World Version’ of John Lennon’s IMAGINE (feat. Shakira, Katy Perry, David Guetta, will.i.am, Neymar Jr., Priyanka Chopra, Idris Elba and thousands more)
  91. @Yan Shen
    I'm attempting to reason with the liberals on Slate by suggesting that countries like the UK follow the example of a Japan or South Korea. Honestly at this point I sound like a broken record both here and on other blogs, but I suspect that large parts of the world could benefit from embracing an East Asian mentality on all sorts of real life issues ranging from education to immigration.

    Sex-selective abortion in Korea has resulted in a huge surplus of men, who are importing poor brides from elsewhere in Asia. The sex ratio imbalance peaked 25-30 years ago at nearly 1.2 to 1, meaning the effect is most acute right now.

    More than a third of marriages in rural South Korea involve foreign women, and these marriages are more fertile than Korean-Korean marriages. By 2020, about one third of children born in Korean will have a non-ethnic-Korean parent.

    http://apjjf.org/-Andrew-Eungi-Kim/3035/article.html

    Aside from foreign brides, the number of foreign migrant labors in South Korea is growing very rapidly.

    South Korea has been importing significant numbers of migrant workers since the early 1990s. As of the end of 2007, registered foreigners totaled 1,066,273, accounting for 2.2 per cent of the total population. The number of foreigners in Korea jumped 2.75 times since 1997 from 386,972. If the current trend continues, the number of foreigners in Korea would reach 1.5 million in 2012, 2.5 million in 2020…

    A large majority of foreigners in Korea have entered the country with work visas and the number of foreigners with work visas, as of May 2008, amounted to more than 700,000. The 2008 total represents an annual increase of nearly 100,000 new arrivals since late 2004, when the figure was 460,000. Most of those who entered Korea with work visas, including more than 200,000 overstaying migrant workers, have been unskilled migrant workers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johann Ricke

    Aside from foreign brides, the number of foreign migrant labors in South Korea is growing very rapidly.
     
    While the number of foreign workers is increasing, the principal route towards permanent residence appears to be marriage to a Korean citizen, and there's no mention of either chain migration or routine annual immigration quotas (permanent residence permits leading to citizenship):

    Despite all the indications that the country is rapidly becoming a multicultural society, the Korean government still insists on almost zero-immigration. In contrast to such “immigration countries” as the United States, Canada, and Australia that have extended citizenship to many new residents and encouraged their integration and assimilation, Korea remains a “non-immigration” country, much like Japan and many Western European countries, its policy objectives centering on controlling inflows, restricting long-term stays, discouraging permanent residence and limiting citizenship.
     
  92. @Perspective
    "It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.

    I hear the Eiffel Tower will soon be surrounded by a glass wall.

    I hope St. Peter’s Basilica has extra security. Is that the most famous place in Europe?"

    A similar thought actually occurred to me today as I was reading a travel magazine on holiday deals to Europe before the attack happened. If people visit Europe to experience European culture , that would obviously mean people want to see European people to get a better appreciation and understanding of that culture. Why doesn't the tourist industry start lobbying for sensible immigration and foreign security policies that would preserve European demographic hegemony? Of course European countries still have mostly 80-85 percent plus majorities, but in Paris I hear even the central city is experiencing Islamification and Africanization.

    Why doesn’t the tourist industry start lobbying for sensible immigration and foreign security policies that would preserve European demographic hegemony? Of course European countries still have mostly 80-85 percent plus majorities, but in Paris I hear even the central city is experiencing Islamification and Africanization.

    The problem is it’s like a virus with a very long delay. Sure, if you go to the wrong place or look at the wrong thing or think the wrong thought, the demographics are alarming. But if you watch French TV, entertainment, politics, etc. the people you see are all white. So why be alarmed? Nothing is changing at all when you watch TV.

    It’s pretty hilarious, really. The usual white people endlessly discussing among themselves the problems of racism, the banlieue, and so on.

    Yeah the tourist industry may be among the first aware there’s a problem… But it’s hard to convince people and change things when the problem is invisible.

    Read More
  93. @Jack Hanson
    You joke but this is LITERALLY Louise Mensch right now on Twitter.

    Blue checkmark Twitter is kind of a sight to behold as the left and right journos are dropping pretenses of "my colleague" and ripping into each other. Surprised at some of the sentiments coming from the Bow Tie Conservative crew.

    I guess they realise the Left doesn't have a plan for what they plan to do with a few million imported <80 IQ fanatics who hate them enough to kill them in painful and slow ways. Some of them are even starting to realise why Trump was elected in spite of all their Never Trump shenanigans.

    …Louise Mensch right now on Twitter.

    I just looked at her Twitter. What a deranged lunatic. I have to admit I’d never heard of her, and I don’t care to learn any more. If that makes me ignorant, fine. Such people aren’t worth paying any attention to.

    Current events are separating the wheat from the chaff.

    The pink revolutionary reaction to our election of Donald Trump, the powers that be freaking out and rolling out their deepest battle plans…

    Our media unleashing perhaps the most obvious propaganda blitz ever seen in America…

    The pathetic response of half our people to barbarians — and our courts coming down on our executive powers with their unconstitutional iron fist to prevent us from keeping those barbarians outside our gates…

    These things lay bare the evil people, the stupid people, the crazy people. We can see the psychopathic shepherds and their sheep uncovered now.

    Never before has it been so obvious who the useless fools are and who manipulates them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lurker
    Note - Louise Mensch is a 'conservative'. Even more staggeringly was a Conservative MP.

    Insanity.

    She's blocked me on Twitter I think.
  94. Remember all those people telling us that we have to admit hundreds of thousands of Muslim immigrants or they’ll only wan to kill us more?

    Well London elected a @$!#&^* Muslim mayor yet the number of terrorist attacks has only increased.

    Gratitude only goes so far, and the people who are coming to take over your country feel absolutely no gratitude at all.

    Read More
  95. @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    I agree. As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.

    I will brace with my Islamic brethren and sistren (if it’s ok with the brethren having them around), fearfully awaiting the backlash much promised, rarely seen.

    Read More
  96. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Dave Pinsen
    In the U.S., you'd think another terrorist attack would make people more inclined to vote for conservatives. In the U.K., bettors seem to think it will have the opposite effect in the upcoming snap election. Maybe anti-incumbency?
    https://twitter.com/dpinsen/status/871162622720307200

    Could be something to do with May having been blasé about police cuts (police states are a good thing now that they hide the true violence of diversity from the public) and Corbyn getting his trendy talking points together: that we destabilized the Middle East, letting jihadism flourish there, which has blown back on us, because “British” Muslims have no agency and must join every jihadist movement that pops up wherever it pops up, and we couldn’t possibly stop letting them in in the first place.

    Read More
  97. What have the Tories under Theresa May done to slow Muslim immigration and reduce their abuse of the welfare system?

    Read More
  98. At some point if the government doesn’t start defending the interests of native Britons and start reducing levels of Muslim immigration the people will start to take matters into their own hands. It may not be happening as soon as you’d think it would, but it’s not a matter of if, but when. Rotherham, Lee Rigby, Manchester, London Bridge, the tube bombings…A limit will be reached.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dave
    Respectfully disagree. The vast majority of the white British population appears to be incapable of self defense. I live in NYC, and I've socialized with several Brits, and after you've softened them up with booze and the defenses fall they will admit that " England is lost " and the England of their youth is gone forever, but there is literally no will to resist in any way. They've just collectively given up. Resistance would make them " bad people ". And nobody wants to be seen by their fellows as a bad person.
    , @SteveRogers42
    The Euros are unarmed. Work-arounds are possible:

    http://www.europeancivilwar.com/german-self-defense-website-works-to-help-citizens-arm-protect-themselves/
    , @Frau Katze

    A limit will be reached.
     
    Not necessarily. As long the police cooperate with the govt, nothing changes.

    Locking people up for insulting Muslims shows that the police are happy with things as they are.
    , @lavoisier
    The limit for a sane population should have been reached some time ago.

    Too many forces at work to prevent the smart and the courageous from doing what is necessary to save their country. The major negative force being brain dead white liberals. Simply too many of these sanctimonious fools alive today and in positions of power.

    However, should economic calamity befall the nation, and people start to go hungry, the equation could change rapidly as even a brain dead white liberal who is hungry might begin to question some things. Liberals are invariably hypocrites and fools, but they don't suffer real injuries with equanimity.

  99. @WR
    You racists!, check Ms. Mensch's twitter if you want to know how enlightened people react after one of these "incidents"

    Louise Mensch‏
    Verified account
     @LouiseMensch 2h
    2 hours ago

    My dear Muslim brothers and sisters in the UK, I stand with you tonight and every night in friendship and patriotism. #LondonBridge

    More
    Let me be plain. The United Kingdom is 100% comfortable being a tolerant diverse nation. Muslim Britons are our friends and neighbors.

    More
    We can see what @PutinRF is doing. It kills him that we do not care to ostracise our Muslim compatriots. Not now. NOT EVER. #LondonBridge

    Why in the name of Cosmic Pete did it take her three tweets to mention Russia? She’s slipping.

    Read More
  100. anonymous says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @J1234
    St. Peters had pretty stout security last year. It took maybe forty minutes to work through the check points. Suicide bombers would find it hard, I would guess. There were bag checks (and metal detectors, as I recall.) There would be other ways to carry out a terrorist act, however, and not much could be done about it.

    Walls don’t work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel H
    >>Walls don’t work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.

    Well, let's just add another 2 feet to the wall, and on and on if necessary.
    , @anon
    Right. Walls don't work. That's why the Han never built the great wall of China. The Romans took a pass on building Hadrian's wall and there are no castles or fortresses throughout Europe from the middle ages.

    Btw, you ever try pulling a 26 foot ladder up by yourself and putting it on the other side? Just the seven foot high walls of Hougoumont kept out 10,000 French troops at Waterloo sport.
    , @englishmike
    Walls don’t work.

    And his holiness Pope Francis believes in building bridges, not walls.
    , @EvolutionistX
    That's why you put electric wire on the top.
    , @Hyperborean
    "Walls don’t work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder."

    Which why you have a guy standing on top of the wall with a rifle making sure the people on the other side don't get ideas.

    But in all seriousness, if migrants knew that climbing over that wall wouldn't ensure an automatic ticket to paradise they would be less likely to do it. Just look at all the "literally Hitler" hyperventilation there was from our moral betters over Denmark requiring asylum seekers to sell their valuable assets to pay for the expense of housing them or Hungary deciding to put migrants in "container camps" instead of "suitable" facilities to deter migrants.
    , @anon
    militarily speaking obstacles aren't meant to stop people - they're meant to slow them down which gives you time to shoot them
    , @J1234

    Walls don’t work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.
     
    And that's why there was armed law enforcement at the checkpoints at St. Peters. But yes, terrorists could compromise these defenses in ways I'd rather not state publicly (though it wouldn't take a genius to figure it out.)

    Nevertheless, a wall or fence is an essential part of any security system, which is why all military bases, prisons and nuclear power facilities have them. The idea that they aren't necessary because they aren't an all encompassing approach to security is ridiculous.
  101. @Yan Shen
    I'm uh only being partly facetious here, but another one of my favorite sayings is WWLKYD (What Would Lee Kuan Yew Do)? Maybe comparing Japan or South Korea to a country like the UK isn't quite apples to apples given that the former are much more homogeneous today.

    But look at a country like Singapore. Yeah I suppose it's a tiny nation state, but still. For most of its history, it's basically been 3/4 Chinese and 1/4 non-Chinese, which to be honest isn't that different from many of the "multicultural" Western nations. In fact, the Chinese make up less of Singapore percentage wise than the majority white ethnic groups do in virtually all European nations. Yet somehow the country has managed to avoid the insanity that is political correctness and most of the pitfalls besetting the modern United States and Western Europe. Somehow Singapore made it work!

    I often lament that if only a modern day Lee Kuan Yew descended from the heavens, alas. And really, imagine if the second coming of Lee Kuan Yew were to be the prime minster of the UK instead of a Theresa May. Would anyone doubt that LKY the Second Coming would do anything less than steer the UK out of its myriad of social predicaments and towards the Promised Land? Would anyone argue against the notion that some rigid Confucian discipline could be exactly what the doctor ordered?

    For most of its history, it’s basically been 3/4 Chinese and 1/4 non-Chinese.

    This is actually incorrect. Singapore was majority Indian until 1948, at least, with Malays and Chinese making up the rest. The Lee Kuan Yew government strongly favored the immigration of Mainland Chinese, without making any public waves about it. The communist takeover of China and subsequent waves of refugees helped change the balance of ethnicities in Singapore. In Singapore itself, history has been retconned to downplay and pigeonhole the role of Indians in its history, to the extent of completely avoiding any mention in their war museums of the presence of significant numbers of the British Indian Army during the fall of Singapore in WWII. This is not surprising if you consider that Singapore was administered out of Calcutta until about 100 years ago, by the British.

    Lee Kuan Yew’s views on the strengths and weaknesses of the various ethnicities in Singapore were explicit. He thought Indians made for good accountants and CFOs, but were not CEO material. When an Indian was appointed the CEO of Singapore biggest bank a few years ago, there was openly published debate in the newspapers about Indian managers not having the magic ingredient.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yan Shen
    Meant to say for most of its recent history. According to Wikipedia since at least 1970 it's basically been about 75/25 Chinese to non-Chinese.

    The interesting thing about LKY is that in some sense he really represents the best of all possible worlds! Even Francis Fukuyama, the patron saint of the End of History and the triumph of democracy and liberalism, conceded that in theory an authoritarian regime ruled by a benevolent dictator was in fact superior to the kind of society he viewed as being the end point of mankind's historical evolution. And LKY was one of the few instances in history of someone who might rightfully be labelled as a benevolent dictator.

    I hope people will understand why the uh wise amongst us might more often than not pine for LKY the Second Coming to return to this earthly realm and dispense some sense and discipline upon the lost and wayward masses...

    , @Numinous

    In Singapore itself, history has been retconned to downplay and pigeonhole the role of Indians in its history, to the extent of completely avoiding any mention in their war museums of the presence of significant numbers of the British Indian Army during the fall of Singapore in WWII.
     
    I didn't know the demographics of Singapore changed so much recently, so thanks for the info. As for Indian participation in WWII, we should keep in mind that the Japanese, while being very hostile to the Chinese, advertised themselves as well-wishers of Indians (whether or not they were sincere is a different question.) They wanted the Indians on their side, at least for a while, to stir up trouble in India against British rule, and possibly even help the Japanese "liberate" India (and then fall into the Japanese lap, I guess.) The Japanese let the Indian nationalist leader, Subhash Chanbdra Bose land in Singapore and recruit an army from among the Indian POWs. Given that many of these POWs had seen their British officers surrender pusillanimously to the Japanese, they were completely disillusioned about the superiority of the British, and many of them enthusiastically flocked to Bose's Indian National Army (which helped the Japanese invade eastern India, but eventually lost and was disbanded.)

    I wonder if these events increased antagonism the local Chinese (including LKY) felt for the local Indians, because the former were most definitely oppressed by the Japanese. Do you have any info on this?
    , @Numinous

    Lee Kuan Yew’s views on the strengths and weaknesses of the various ethnicities in Singapore were explicit. He thought Indians made for good accountants and CFOs, but were not CEO material.
     
    Do you have any citations for this? If LKY thought so, presumably he thought Chinese made better CEOs than Indians? The stereotype seems to have been reversed in the US though; many Fortune 500 companies have Indian CEOs, many more so than East Asians.
    , @Bill B.
    Singapore was majority Indian after the war?

    Balderdash!

    The census of 1947 recorded a population of 940,824 comprising 75.2 percent Chinese, 12.9 percent Malay, 7.7 percent Indians, 1.3 percent Eurasians, and 2.9 percent Europeans and other communities.[17]
     
    http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/history/events/97c37d90-b4f7-4d9b-8306-6fb2c4476c59#17
    , @AnonJT

    This is actually incorrect. Singapore was majority Indian until 1948, at least, with Malays and Chinese making up the rest.
     
    Nope. That's not true at all. You can check out Singapore's demographic history here ...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore

    From the article itself...

    By 1821, the population was estimated to have increased to 4,724 Malays and 1,150 Chinese.[35] In the first census of 1824, 6,505 out of the 10,683 total were Malays and Bugis, constituting over 60% of the population. Large number of Chinese migrants started to enter Singapore just months after it became a British settlement, and they were predominantly male. In 1826, official census figures give a total population of 13,750, with 6,088 Chinese, 4,790 Malays, 1,242 Bugis, 1,021 Indians from Bengal (244) and the Coromandel Coast (777), smaller number of Javanese (267), Europeans (87) and other peoples.[19] The population total of Singapore increased to 16,000 in 1829, 26,000 five years later. By 1836, the Chinese at 13,749 had become the most populous ethnic group, overtaking the broad Malay grouping (12,538, including other groups such as the Bugis, Javanese, and Balinese).[37] By the beginning of 1850, the population had reached 60,000, 24,790 of them Chinese.
     
    If you look at the charts provided, you'll see that at no point in its history do Indians surpass the Malay and Chinese populations. The article provides citations for reference.
  102. anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @syonredux

    The men, ‘of Mediterranean origin’, reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge, then began ‘randomly stabbing people’ along Borough High Street”
     
    MMM, how vexing. ‘of Mediterranean origin’.....that could mean anything. Why, they could be Greek, or Italian, or Spanish....

    Sardinian separatists.

    Read More
  103. Just wait for the men ‘of Mediterranean origin’ to get themselves behind the whirling blades of this newToyota:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4568766/Toyota-test-drives-flying-CAR.html

    Flying carpet bombing waiting to happen.

    Read More
  104. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Jamie_NYC
    Well, judging from the comments at this and some other web sites, the fears of a backlash that will follow this terror attack, that the muslim community expressed last week, were fully justified!

    The only way I see to improve the situation is to somehow achieve an increase in frequency of these attacks, so that the authorities can make statistical predictions: "For this weekend, we forecast between seven and ten mass stabbings and three to five bombings, with total body count in the low eighties. Have a safe and pleasant weekend!"

    Like the weather report.

    Read More
  105. anonymous says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @aceofspades
    Nothing will change. Flowers, vigils, Facebook profile changes, rinse and repeat.

    UNICEF ‘World Version’ of John Lennon’s IMAGINE (feat. Shakira, Katy Perry, David Guetta, will.i.am, Neymar Jr., Priyanka Chopra, Idris Elba and thousands more)

    Read More
  106. @Dave Pinsen
    In the U.S., you'd think another terrorist attack would make people more inclined to vote for conservatives. In the U.K., bettors seem to think it will have the opposite effect in the upcoming snap election. Maybe anti-incumbency?
    https://twitter.com/dpinsen/status/871162622720307200

    Am I missing something here?

    Corbyn now up to 19% to be PM on June 30. Current polls show Tories expect to pad on another net 40 seats on top of their current ~100 seat lead over Labour. Polls routinely understate Tory support. In the very unlikely event of no Tory majority, the minor parties hate Corbyn and would coalition only with their own PM or a non-Corbyn from either major party.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dave Pinsen
    My money's on the 360-369 Conservative seats contract, at an average cost of 15 cents, but as of a couple of days ago, the 390+ contract was the highest priced one. Now it's the 329 or fewer contract.

    I don't think Brits are legally allowed to use PredictIt though, so not sure how accurate this market is.
    , @anon
    That's not quite right.
    While the Tories do have 101 more MPs than Labour, their majority in the House of Commons is only 17. A loss of 9 Seats could lose them Government.
    None of the other Parties have repudiated Labour, and all of them have left their options open regarding Corbyn.

    http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/
    , @anon

    Am I missing something here?
     
    The UK welfare state is crumbling because of mass immigration of cheap labor.

    The conservatives don't care because the people who bribe them benefit from the cheap labor and don't use the welfare state.

    However they briefly let it show they don't care and (if the polls are accurate?????) it's hurting them.

    SJWs care about the welfare state (partly because most of them work in it) but are too innumerate to understand that mass immigration is causing the problem - but so are most of the voters so Corbyn is currently benefiting.

    Also the Cons don't get much benefit from security / immigration issues nowadays because they want open borders as much as SJWs do (for cheap labor whereas SJWs want it for the votes).

    (also the conservatives want to privatize the police so have been reducing police numbers which is hurting them now as well)

  107. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Jimbo in OPKS
    Is it too soon to wonder if this drags T. May over the finish line.

    The Election was originally about reaffirming Brexit, and May was looking at an 100+ makority, going on the early Polls.
    Since then, Tory campaigning, focused on the lacklustre May, has been poor, and the Polls have tightened.
    Corbyn’s response to Manchester has been that it is blowback from British involvement in Middle East wars.
    That’s not a bad line, similar to the Ron Paul line, and Labour could form a minority Government by winning another 25 Seats on the strength of it.
    If May cannot respond to the latest events with concrete proposals, rather than pap, she”ll be toast on June 8.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Corbyn’s response to Manchester has been that it is blowback from British involvement in Middle East wars.

    He's right of course.
    , @Random Dude on the Internet
    The alt right oddly enough also seems to be backing Corbyn over May. Partly because of accelerationism and partly because it seems like UKIP has totally deflated since Farage stepping down the first time. It is shocking how incompetent May has been as a PM, not because I figured she would do better, it's more that she's just that incompetent that it continues to surprise.
    , @O'Really
    It had better be more than just proposals. If she doesn't take real action in the next 48 hours, I suspect a few million core Conservative/Brexiteer voters would just sit home, and hand the election to Corbyn. (they won't be convinced to vote for the Islamicized Labour Party, but they won't need to)
  108. @Greasy William
    When you guys bash Islam you are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non Muslims.

    We are going to get mass immigration anyway so it is better that it be Islamic because Muslims alienate the public so much more. Also Muslims are much more of a threat to Globalism than any of us will ever be.

    When you guys bash Islam you are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non Muslims.

    WTF are you talking about? Do you even read this site? Most of the people here want a halt or severe curtailing of all immigration, legal and illegal.

    Read More
  109. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    'Incident' rather than 'attack' is really catching on for those following the 'Minimize Islamic Terrorism' style book.

    Let’s start calling them massacres.

    Only five people died in the Boston Massacre of 1770, but that event helped start a revolution.

    We need to become more militant in our attitude toward all the bullshit that’s been fed to us for too long.

    Tonight’s event was another Islamist massacre of Whites in London. It was caused by open immigration policies, cultural relativism, and political correctness.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    ...and the murders we have committed in the Middle East.
    , @Uebersetzer
    That, and a few other things.
    One of the dead was from Ireland and was not killed outright. He actually issued a statement before he died exonerating the soldiers. He said in his native Ireland British troops opened fire on crowds with far less provocation than they had received in Boston.
  110. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/871143765473406976

    Trump’s tweet: “We need to be smart, vigilant and tough. We need the courts to give us back our rights. We need the Travel Ban as an extra level of safety!”

    Good for him. It’s about time he started pulling the Obama/global warming/ hate-whitey tactics: using a recent event to push forward the agenda. It works.

    Punch back twice as hard.

    Read More
  111. @PiltdownMan

    For most of its history, it’s basically been 3/4 Chinese and 1/4 non-Chinese.
     
    This is actually incorrect. Singapore was majority Indian until 1948, at least, with Malays and Chinese making up the rest. The Lee Kuan Yew government strongly favored the immigration of Mainland Chinese, without making any public waves about it. The communist takeover of China and subsequent waves of refugees helped change the balance of ethnicities in Singapore. In Singapore itself, history has been retconned to downplay and pigeonhole the role of Indians in its history, to the extent of completely avoiding any mention in their war museums of the presence of significant numbers of the British Indian Army during the fall of Singapore in WWII. This is not surprising if you consider that Singapore was administered out of Calcutta until about 100 years ago, by the British.

    Lee Kuan Yew's views on the strengths and weaknesses of the various ethnicities in Singapore were explicit. He thought Indians made for good accountants and CFOs, but were not CEO material. When an Indian was appointed the CEO of Singapore biggest bank a few years ago, there was openly published debate in the newspapers about Indian managers not having the magic ingredient.

    Meant to say for most of its recent history. According to Wikipedia since at least 1970 it’s basically been about 75/25 Chinese to non-Chinese.

    The interesting thing about LKY is that in some sense he really represents the best of all possible worlds! Even Francis Fukuyama, the patron saint of the End of History and the triumph of democracy and liberalism, conceded that in theory an authoritarian regime ruled by a benevolent dictator was in fact superior to the kind of society he viewed as being the end point of mankind’s historical evolution. And LKY was one of the few instances in history of someone who might rightfully be labelled as a benevolent dictator.

    I hope people will understand why the uh wise amongst us might more often than not pine for LKY the Second Coming to return to this earthly realm and dispense some sense and discipline upon the lost and wayward masses…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Singapore has abysmal TFR. LKY failed. Feminism destroys all.
  112. @anon
    The Election was originally about reaffirming Brexit, and May was looking at an 100+ makority, going on the early Polls.
    Since then, Tory campaigning, focused on the lacklustre May, has been poor, and the Polls have tightened.
    Corbyn's response to Manchester has been that it is blowback from British involvement in Middle East wars.
    That's not a bad line, similar to the Ron Paul line, and Labour could form a minority Government by winning another 25 Seats on the strength of it.
    If May cannot respond to the latest events with concrete proposals, rather than pap, she''ll be toast on June 8.

    Corbyn’s response to Manchester has been that it is blowback from British involvement in Middle East wars.

    He’s right of course.

    Read More
    • Agree: Randal
    • Replies: @Ed
    He's wrong of course. The jihadists attack in countries that send no or very few troops or forces to the Middle East (Belgium) and don't attack in countries that have serious involvement (Poland).
    , @Bill B.
    No, the Jihadists are not attacking European countries because of their foreign policy.

    They are attacking them because they are full of filthy kaffirs and it is the good Muslim's duty to attack the kaffirs that refuse to submit. This is very clearly spelled out in the Jihadist literature.

    Boualem Sansal, the superb and brave Algerian writer, in Le Figaro last week said that Islamists think Europe is "in play" and ready for the plucking.

    He said that Daesh/ISIS is probably doomed but it will make no difference; just as the demise of the Algerian FIS, the destruction of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the ousting of the Taliban from Kabul etc. did little to halt the spread of Islamism. Indeed whatever replaces ISIS will likely have an even more cruel and more obdurate leader.

    The Islamists, Sansal said, leap like wolves on European weakness and ignorance to lard the West with Sunni Islamic communities where sharia law is obligatory. Defeat and victory are the same for the Islamists: victory means expansion; defeat means the 'moderate' Muslims are pandered to by a West that slowing succumbs to Wahabi-style Islam.

    He pointed out that Islamism with the sword is actually expanding faster in Europe now than it is in the MENA countries where typically tough but effective local religious frameworks hold it at bay.

    Personally I think he is right: there is no mechanism in Islam to switch off the jihadi gene and there is seeming nothing to persuade Western authorities that Jihadi atrocities are not eruptions with wholly mysterious causes. This will continue for some time.

    (The article is behind a paywall but I googled a chunk of the text to find a copy).

  113. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Chebyshev
    No matter how bad the Irish Republican Army was, their past terror attacks do not suggest that admitting tens of thousands of Muslims into the U.K. is a good idea.

    What the IRA terrorism did suggest, was that it wasn’t a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century.
    Like the Muslims later on, they never assimilated and remained hostile to British people and their way of life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    There is one flaw in your analogy sir. In the early 20th century Ireland was a part of the United Kingdom. This is not the case for the Muslim invaders. Kind of a home-grown terrorism vs an imported one.
    , @Lot

    it wasn’t a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century
     
    You assume the alternative would be no immigration. Capital demands cheap labor, so just as likely the Irish who did not come would have been replaced by Africans and South Asians.
    , @Daniel H
    >>What the IRA terrorism did suggest, was that it wasn’t a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century.

    Problem being, that during the entire 19th and 20th century, and up until this very minute, Northern Ireland was/is as much a part of the UK as Westminster. Northern Irish are UK citizens as much as Enoch Powell was.
    , @James Richard
    No, what the IRA terrorism suggests is that it wasn't a good idea for the English to colonize Ulster with thousands of Scottish Presbyterians.
    , @daniel le mouche
    I'm sure you'll readily agree that it was the Anglo Saxons that rather forcefully 'admitted' themselves to Britain a millenium and a half ago, and that it was THEY who over many centuries tormented the Celts of Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Cornwall. It was the charming Cromwell who created the hell known as Northern Ireland, using the tried old trick of importing foreigners, whose progeny within a generation or two are just as 'native' as the true natives. Before him, it was the charming Englishwoman Elizabeth who ordered all Catholics in England drawn and quartered, whether Irish or English. Terrorism is the weapon of the bullied. How was one to fight the power of the British Empire and Crown? That's the only way. They were totally justified, no matter how the English moan about every precious Anglo Saxon killed, convenientlychoosing to ignore the utter destruction of Ireland by their ancestors.
  114. @Hyperborean
    Isn't it interesting how often when these types of attacks happen the secret police tells us that the perpetrators were known jihadist radicals. If the intelligence services knows that they are dangerous and likely to carry out an attack at some point, even if not in the immediate future, why don't they do anything to prevent it? Is it simply out of "respecting their rights", cowardice or something more sinister?

    Maybe just a problem of numbers. There might be a lot of suspicious characters, a relatively few of go on to commit terrorism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @David Allan coe
    True, they would need to deport half the Muslim males in the UK, but too many are British born citizens. They don't even lock up terrorists guilty of mass slaughter for more than 20 years.
  115. @rw95
    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    Nothing will change. In fact I’m sure some commenter will be along here shortly to tell us yet again that this had nothing to do with the jihad and martyrdom doctrine in Islam but rather was caused by US foreign policy or Israel or something.

    Read More
  116. I guess the British have totally forgotten (or chosen to fully ignore) the ‘Father of Pakistan’ Muhammad Ali Jinnah who persuaded the British that an India containing a large Muslim population would inevitably fall apart.

    In a 1940 Muslim League conference in Lahore, Jinnah said:

    “It is a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality; and this misconception of one Indian nation has gone far beyond the limits and is the cause of more of our troubles and will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time.

    The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, and literature[s]….and indeed they belong to two different civilisations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspects [perspectives] on life, and of life, are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Mussalmans derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, their heroes are different…. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other, and likewise their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent, and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built up for the government of such a state.”

    [Paragraph 23]:
    http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/txt_jinnah_lahore_1940.html

    Substitute Christians (or secularists or westerners) for Hindus and Europe for India and the “growing discontent, and final destruction of any fabric” prediction is the seeming fate of Europe.

    Read More
  117. @Wilkey
    At some point if the government doesn't start defending the interests of native Britons and start reducing levels of Muslim immigration the people will start to take matters into their own hands. It may not be happening as soon as you'd think it would, but it's not a matter of if, but when. Rotherham, Lee Rigby, Manchester, London Bridge, the tube bombings...A limit will be reached.

    Respectfully disagree. The vast majority of the white British population appears to be incapable of self defense. I live in NYC, and I’ve socialized with several Brits, and after you’ve softened them up with booze and the defenses fall they will admit that ” England is lost ” and the England of their youth is gone forever, but there is literally no will to resist in any way. They’ve just collectively given up. Resistance would make them ” bad people “. And nobody wants to be seen by their fellows as a bad person.

    Read More
    • Agree: Kevin C., rw95
    • Replies: @BB753
    Not to mention there's a host of hate-laws forbidding even the softest protest against immivasion and rapefugees. If English lads were to try to defend themselves and push back Muslims, they'd be met with the utmost violence by riot police and put in prison in the blink of an eye. For Britons to be free to protect themselves, they'd have to take down the whole regime. Not an easy task.
    , @Anonymouse
    So says Jonn Derbyshire and he should know.
    , @ben tillman

    Respectfully disagree. The vast majority of the white British population appears to be incapable of self defense. I live in NYC, and I’ve socialized with several Brits, and after you’ve softened them up with booze and the defenses fall they will admit that ” England is lost ” and the England of their youth is gone forever, but there is literally no will to resist in any way. They’ve just collectively given up. Resistance would make them ” bad people “. And nobody wants to be seen by their fellows as a bad person.
     
    That's why someone important needs to speak out. Someone more important than Morrissey.

    Someone named Elizabeth, Charles, or William. Or even Harry.
  118. @Opinionator
    I don’t particularly inhabit their mental mindsets or undwrstand what they think they will accomplish

    These appear to be rational acts. Why do you see them as irrational?

    Come on. If you are going to premeditated give your life for an attack that you are not commanded to do by your superior officer and that has virtually no chance of survival… wouldn’t you want to actually accomplish something instead of just doing the same thing that 50 other guys did before you while accomplishing nothing?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    It is imposing a cost on the British people for their aggression against Muslims in the Middle East. Basic tit for tat game strategy. Highly rational.

    The strategy does assume that the British are rational and sentient and sovereign. If they were, they would cease their aggression there, direct and indirect.

  119. I am a POM Kiwi, born in the UK. This is the new normal. I don’t care any more. Londoners elected a mayor with fundamentalist sympathies and felt oh-so-smug about doing so. The smugness was so extreme you could almost sense it in the atmosphere.

    Pimp my daughter
    Mug my mother
    I still love you
    You’re my brother

    hashtag- thoughts and prayers, light and candle blah-dee-blah

    rinse and repeat.

    I am in Cyprus at the moment. Most of the POMs I meet here are well aware of what a disaster this has been, but it’s too late.

    Kiwis often suffer from exactly the same mindless smugness that brought about this catastrophe in England.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cowboy Shaw
    Kiwi living in London here. NZers are the smuggest most pompous people of the Anglosphere. We are truly convinced, in a religious sense, that there is something different in the dirt in NZ that confers moral excellency upon us, and anyone else who deigns to land there. One day, there will be terror act there and the sense of stupefaction will be off the charts.
  120. @Yan Shen
    I'm uh only being partly facetious here, but another one of my favorite sayings is WWLKYD (What Would Lee Kuan Yew Do)? Maybe comparing Japan or South Korea to a country like the UK isn't quite apples to apples given that the former are much more homogeneous today.

    But look at a country like Singapore. Yeah I suppose it's a tiny nation state, but still. For most of its history, it's basically been 3/4 Chinese and 1/4 non-Chinese, which to be honest isn't that different from many of the "multicultural" Western nations. In fact, the Chinese make up less of Singapore percentage wise than the majority white ethnic groups do in virtually all European nations. Yet somehow the country has managed to avoid the insanity that is political correctness and most of the pitfalls besetting the modern United States and Western Europe. Somehow Singapore made it work!

    I often lament that if only a modern day Lee Kuan Yew descended from the heavens, alas. And really, imagine if the second coming of Lee Kuan Yew were to be the prime minster of the UK instead of a Theresa May. Would anyone doubt that LKY the Second Coming would do anything less than steer the UK out of its myriad of social predicaments and towards the Promised Land? Would anyone argue against the notion that some rigid Confucian discipline could be exactly what the doctor ordered?

    I often lament that if only a modern day Lee Kuan Yew descended from the heavens, alas. And really, imagine if the second coming of Lee Kuan Yew were to be the prime minster of the UK instead of a Theresa May. Would anyone doubt that LKY the Second Coming would do anything less than steer the UK out of its myriad of social predicaments and towards the Promised Land? Would anyone argue against the notion that some rigid Confucian discipline could be exactly what the doctor ordered?

    What specific things would PM LKY do to improve the UK? Closing down radical mosques, stopping immigration and deporting illegals? As PM he might get the last one done. What would he do to integrate the 15% of the population that is foreign born? The 5% Muslim population? The black population? More prosaic, what would he do to reduce housing prices and improve the NHS? I know, import a million Chinese cognitive elites!

    You’re too enamored with LKY and your co-ethnics. I’m not sure if it’s blinding you to the real world impossibilities of your ideas, or if you’re just oblivious to the real world in general.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Judah Benjamin Hur
    Singapore is about 14% muslim, though they are mostly Malays. The other major minority is Indians, who have low rates of violent criminality.
  121. @Yan Shen
    I'm attempting to reason with the liberals on Slate by suggesting that countries like the UK follow the example of a Japan or South Korea. Honestly at this point I sound like a broken record both here and on other blogs, but I suspect that large parts of the world could benefit from embracing an East Asian mentality on all sorts of real life issues ranging from education to immigration.

    Europe wants to die. She’s successfully implementing her strategy. Stop disturbing her.

    To be more exact, the elite seems to have that as their plan and much of the population appears to largely agree. There’s nothing left to say, really. The world wars have killed all of the real men.

    Its really sad.There are tons of effective strategies, but none of them are being implemented. The will is wanting.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    • Replies: @Random Dude on the Internet
    Europeans today are living in a post-colonial world. Many of these countries, especially the UK and France, used to have impressive empires that spanned the globe that are now totally gone, with the exception of a couple islands here and there. To live in a society where they're past their peak, it probably doesn't seem like it is worth saving. The best days of their country are long since gone. It also explains why Eastern European countries have been dealing with immigration better than Western European countries: they finally have their countries back after centuries of being conquered and don't want to give it up yet again to a foreign power.

    America is a little different because we're still in Pax Americana so people are a little more aware of what is at stake, which is why Trump got elected.
    , @SteveRogers42
    Dan, the theory about the world wars killing off the best stock seems plausible when you look at Germany and Western Europe, but Russia and the East suffered horrendous casualties as well, and there doesn't seem to be any shortage of high-T alphas in those places. Also, the most cucked nation on the continent is Sweden, and they haven't lost a single soldier in combat for the last 150 years.

    I'm not saying that the great cullings of the 20th century had no effect, but there's got to be something else going on there, as well.
  122. @Lot
    Am I missing something here?

    Corbyn now up to 19% to be PM on June 30. Current polls show Tories expect to pad on another net 40 seats on top of their current ~100 seat lead over Labour. Polls routinely understate Tory support. In the very unlikely event of no Tory majority, the minor parties hate Corbyn and would coalition only with their own PM or a non-Corbyn from either major party.

    My money’s on the 360-369 Conservative seats contract, at an average cost of 15 cents, but as of a couple of days ago, the 390+ contract was the highest priced one. Now it’s the 329 or fewer contract.

    I don’t think Brits are legally allowed to use PredictIt though, so not sure how accurate this market is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lot

    I don’t think Brits are legally allowed to use PredictIt though, so not sure how accurate this market is.
     
    Though would be odd given how many online event betting sites seem to be in the UK.
  123. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    It’s about 4/am GMT Sunday. Sunday is the day Arianna Grande will have her ” love and unity” memorial concert in Manchester .

    Security will be tight at the concert.
    I think I’ll quit my job and start a cheap Chinese teddy bear, candle and plastic flower import business in Britian.

    Heritage Foundation guy is on TV right now praising the Britiah intelligence forces. If they are so effective but allow the Rotherham rapes and endless attacks might perhaps lead a conspiracy theorist to wonder if the security forces, like the Rotherham police are under orders to let the Muslims take over the country

    Read More
  124. @PiltdownMan

    It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.
     
    My nineteen-year-old kid is in London right now, visiting a friend and was out on the town Saturday night GMT. She texted me three hours ago, was about half-a-mile away from the incident, and said the usual Saturday night crowds appear not to have batted an eyelid, but to check their smartphones.

    They are made of pretty stern stuff over there, q.v. the Blitz. So also, I'm happy to say, PiltdownJunior1 and friends.

    the usual Saturday night crowds appear not to have batted an eyelid, but to check their smartphones.

    They are made of pretty stern stuff over there, q.v. the Blitz. So also, I’m happy to say, PiltdownJunior1 and friends.

    Stern stuff, eh? What are any of these people doing to resist being displaced from their homelands?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    They can't do anything about it because they don't own the land. Not one square inch. Somebody else does. An old lady. And her bankers.
    They also don't have an Army or Navy etc. Again, personal property of said old lady and her financial advisers, with solemn oaths and all. To protect all Her land, that was stolen in 1066.
    And on top of that it's jail if you carry so much as a jack-knife or a melon-baller in public, as a commoner.

    Suggestions please. Vote Her out?? lol.
  125. @bored identity
    Feel uncomfortable about the series of unfortunate vehicular jihad events?

    Keep Calm and Eat Your Soy!


    Lawrence of Tribalia echo-chambers collective fear about real clear & present danger:


    https://twitter.com/LHSummers/status/870394334373437441

    Does Larry feel that way about Bibi. Bibi believes in walls. Bibi believes in protecting his own. Bibi gets the best deals he can for his own country.

    Larry will never again, evidently, publicly test the diversity and progressive gods.

    Read More
  126. @anon
    MENA people vs MENSA people. Sadly, for them, MENA people don't have what it takes to be successful in a MENSA world, so they lash out at society. Also, it doesn't help that MENA people, due to centuries of inbreeding, tend to look 'off'. They're not getting much sex from white women, and that isn't helping matters.

    MENSA people have no advantage in the struggle for survival. Mother nature has her own priorities in sorting out winners and losers. I’m a pessimist. I think MENA and continental African peoples have the competitive advantage.

    Read More
  127. @Buzz Mohawk
    Let's start calling them massacres.

    Only five people died in the Boston Massacre of 1770, but that event helped start a revolution.

    We need to become more militant in our attitude toward all the bullshit that's been fed to us for too long.

    Tonight's event was another Islamist massacre of Whites in London. It was caused by open immigration policies, cultural relativism, and political correctness.

    …and the murders we have committed in the Middle East.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Lets assume you are right. Just for argument's sake. They still couldn't kill British people in Britain if they couldn't get INSIDE into Britain. So it really is the open immigration policies as the cause.
    , @syonredux

    Tonight’s event was another Islamist massacre of Whites in London. It was caused by open immigration policies, cultural relativism, and political correctness.

    …and the murders we have committed in the Middle East.
     
    MMMM, clip-paste....Invade the world, invite the world.

    I assume that things will settle down once St Peter's and St Paul's are converted to mosques, and every Muslim has his quota of pubescent European girls to rape......
    , @Buzz Mohawk
    It's time to stop using one half of Invade/Invite to argue against our right and responsibility to protect ourselves.

    When you decide to invade people, the smart thing to do is not to allow them into your country.

    Every other race on Earth puts its own kind ahead of others, and every other race has invaded others at one time or another. Repeated retorts like "...and the murders we have committed in the Middle East" are getting old.

    They would invade us anyway, if given the chance, as they have done in the past.
    , @Clyde
    You are a dumb, self blaming, self hater. Hater of his own people too. Pffftttt..... I never insult other posters but you are an ill educated blight. Troll, you are joining Corvinus in the Unz kill file.
  128. Well, its a good thing that the terrorists have low IQs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Judah Benjamin Hur
    No question about it. Just consider how much damage one smart terrorist was able to inflict (Bin Laden). I'm worried that something like that (or much worse) will happen again.
  129. @anonymous
    Walls don't work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.

    >>Walls don’t work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.

    Well, let’s just add another 2 feet to the wall, and on and on if necessary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SteveRogers42
    Along with Active Denial Systems, National Guard vehicle and aerial patrols, volunteer sheriff's posses, etc. Prioritize the Great Wall of Trump as a national security issue.

    THE national security issue.
  130. @Dave Pinsen
    My money's on the 360-369 Conservative seats contract, at an average cost of 15 cents, but as of a couple of days ago, the 390+ contract was the highest priced one. Now it's the 329 or fewer contract.

    I don't think Brits are legally allowed to use PredictIt though, so not sure how accurate this market is.

    I don’t think Brits are legally allowed to use PredictIt though, so not sure how accurate this market is.

    Though would be odd given how many online event betting sites seem to be in the UK.

    Read More
  131. @Intelligent Dasein
    The enemy is already inside St. Peter's. Anti-Pope Francis has repeatedly called for more immigrants and "welcoming." However, none of that will stop the Muslims from bombing it anyway.

    Agree. Dammit, how do I get an increase in my agree tokens?

    Read More
  132. @Lugash

    I often lament that if only a modern day Lee Kuan Yew descended from the heavens, alas. And really, imagine if the second coming of Lee Kuan Yew were to be the prime minster of the UK instead of a Theresa May. Would anyone doubt that LKY the Second Coming would do anything less than steer the UK out of its myriad of social predicaments and towards the Promised Land? Would anyone argue against the notion that some rigid Confucian discipline could be exactly what the doctor ordered?
     
    What specific things would PM LKY do to improve the UK? Closing down radical mosques, stopping immigration and deporting illegals? As PM he might get the last one done. What would he do to integrate the 15% of the population that is foreign born? The 5% Muslim population? The black population? More prosaic, what would he do to reduce housing prices and improve the NHS? I know, import a million Chinese cognitive elites!

    You're too enamored with LKY and your co-ethnics. I'm not sure if it's blinding you to the real world impossibilities of your ideas, or if you're just oblivious to the real world in general.

    Singapore is about 14% muslim, though they are mostly Malays. The other major minority is Indians, who have low rates of violent criminality.

    Read More
  133. @anon
    The Election was originally about reaffirming Brexit, and May was looking at an 100+ makority, going on the early Polls.
    Since then, Tory campaigning, focused on the lacklustre May, has been poor, and the Polls have tightened.
    Corbyn's response to Manchester has been that it is blowback from British involvement in Middle East wars.
    That's not a bad line, similar to the Ron Paul line, and Labour could form a minority Government by winning another 25 Seats on the strength of it.
    If May cannot respond to the latest events with concrete proposals, rather than pap, she''ll be toast on June 8.

    The alt right oddly enough also seems to be backing Corbyn over May. Partly because of accelerationism and partly because it seems like UKIP has totally deflated since Farage stepping down the first time. It is shocking how incompetent May has been as a PM, not because I figured she would do better, it’s more that she’s just that incompetent that it continues to surprise.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Why the hell did Farage step down?
    , @Randal

    The alt right oddly enough also seems to be backing Corbyn over May. Partly because of accelerationism and partly because it seems like UKIP has totally deflated since Farage stepping down the first time.
     
    UKIP understandably has not yet reorganised itself to deal with the consequences of achieving its core goal with the victory in the Brexit referendum.

    As for supporting Corbyn over May that might be going a bit far, but with May allowing the advance of "hate speech" censorship and harassment of patriots and traditionalists, and enthusiastically continuing the invade the world globalist policies and, perhaps less enthusiastically, the related invite the world policies, it's hard to get up much enthusiasm for voting "Conservative". It's more a case, I think, of voting tactically for the more reliably pro-Brexit candidate in each constituency regardless of party.

    And, of course, as someone who has been openly menaced with the threat of legal harassment by someone supposedly representing jewish interests, this kind of stuff makes me feel that even a Labour victory would at least have some redeeming features:

    If Jeremy Corbyn and his followers do not suffer a gigantic defeat in this election, it will be an utter, complete, ghastly disaster for Jews. It will mean that despite all that has happened in the past two years, all his supporters have said about Jews, people — even Jews, for goodness sake — can still support him. … Jeremy Corbyn mustn’t just lose. He must be crushed electorally. It must be impossible for his supporters to say that it wasn’t too bad and they should have another go. …

     

    , @Jack Hanson
    Unsurprisingly, crypto-cuck Michael B Dougherty is a YUGE fan of May.
    , @Intelligent Dasein

    The alt right oddly enough also seems to be backing Corbyn over May. Partly because of accelerationism...
     
    I just need to say at this juncture that accelerationism is utterly stupid. I have no respect and no patience for anyone who would even propose such a thing. Not only is it morally impermissible to do evil that good may come of it, it is also tactically the very pitch of insanity to think that you're somehow helping your cause by doing your enemy's work for him. There is no Hegelian antithesis that's going to appear ex machina to save the day, and to hope for such a thing is both delusional and deranged.
    , @jim jones
    The Daily Mail, which is the propaganda organ of the Conservative Party, loves Theresa May
  134. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Alien Muslims living in Europe.

    Why Europeans can’t have nice things anymore.

    Read More
  135. @anon
    The Election was originally about reaffirming Brexit, and May was looking at an 100+ makority, going on the early Polls.
    Since then, Tory campaigning, focused on the lacklustre May, has been poor, and the Polls have tightened.
    Corbyn's response to Manchester has been that it is blowback from British involvement in Middle East wars.
    That's not a bad line, similar to the Ron Paul line, and Labour could form a minority Government by winning another 25 Seats on the strength of it.
    If May cannot respond to the latest events with concrete proposals, rather than pap, she''ll be toast on June 8.

    It had better be more than just proposals. If she doesn’t take real action in the next 48 hours, I suspect a few million core Conservative/Brexiteer voters would just sit home, and hand the election to Corbyn. (they won’t be convinced to vote for the Islamicized Labour Party, but they won’t need to)

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    If she doesn’t take real action in the next 48 hours, I suspect a few million core Conservative/Brexiteer voters would just sit home
     
    yes - i think that is a real possibility. in the US there are always reasons for patriots to force themselves to vote GOPe (despite what traitors they are) because of things like supreme court appointments

    but in western Europe the conservatives (bribed by the banking mafia) have fully adopted SJW ideology because open borders ideology suits the banking mafia's desire for endless cheap labor
  136. @Daniel Chieh
    Well, its a good thing that the terrorists have low IQs.

    No question about it. Just consider how much damage one smart terrorist was able to inflict (Bin Laden). I’m worried that something like that (or much worse) will happen again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    No question about it. Just consider how much damage one smart terrorist was able to inflict (Bin Laden). I’m worried that something like that (or much worse) will happen again.
     
    hmm... CNN pitched this idea tonight. Namely that the 'low tech' British attacks are a sign that the State has rooted out more effective and dangerous terrorist attacks. Leaving only knives and rental vehicles.

    Not to mention the idea that the current attacks are due to ISIS, which isn't who they -- the Brit Muslims -- are. So the Brit establishment Muslims are not responsible for the deplorable Muslims. Not to mention that they aren't immigrants anyway. And the fact they are not more integrated into society is the fault of bigoted whites. Not to mention they need more money to provide services. &c.

    Of course, it is all absurd, but facts have no bearing on any of this. The globalist agenda is immune to evidence.
    , @ben tillman

    No question about it. Just consider how much damage one smart terrorist was able to inflict (Bin Laden). I’m worried that something like that (or much worse) will happen again.
     
    That depends on whether it would be good for PNAC.
  137. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    The mosques are barracks.

    Universalist white westerners just don’t get it. They relentless project their worldview onto the scorpion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SteveRogers42
    That is an excellent line, sir. I hope you don't mind if I appropriate it.
  138. @Lot
    Sex-selective abortion in Korea has resulted in a huge surplus of men, who are importing poor brides from elsewhere in Asia. The sex ratio imbalance peaked 25-30 years ago at nearly 1.2 to 1, meaning the effect is most acute right now.

    More than a third of marriages in rural South Korea involve foreign women, and these marriages are more fertile than Korean-Korean marriages. By 2020, about one third of children born in Korean will have a non-ethnic-Korean parent.

    http://apjjf.org/-Andrew-Eungi-Kim/3035/article.html

    Aside from foreign brides, the number of foreign migrant labors in South Korea is growing very rapidly.

    South Korea has been importing significant numbers of migrant workers since the early 1990s. As of the end of 2007, registered foreigners totaled 1,066,273, accounting for 2.2 per cent of the total population. The number of foreigners in Korea jumped 2.75 times since 1997 from 386,972. If the current trend continues, the number of foreigners in Korea would reach 1.5 million in 2012, 2.5 million in 2020...

    A large majority of foreigners in Korea have entered the country with work visas and the number of foreigners with work visas, as of May 2008, amounted to more than 700,000. The 2008 total represents an annual increase of nearly 100,000 new arrivals since late 2004, when the figure was 460,000. Most of those who entered Korea with work visas, including more than 200,000 overstaying migrant workers, have been unskilled migrant workers.
     

    Aside from foreign brides, the number of foreign migrant labors in South Korea is growing very rapidly.

    While the number of foreign workers is increasing, the principal route towards permanent residence appears to be marriage to a Korean citizen, and there’s no mention of either chain migration or routine annual immigration quotas (permanent residence permits leading to citizenship):

    Despite all the indications that the country is rapidly becoming a multicultural society, the Korean government still insists on almost zero-immigration. In contrast to such “immigration countries” as the United States, Canada, and Australia that have extended citizenship to many new residents and encouraged their integration and assimilation, Korea remains a “non-immigration” country, much like Japan and many Western European countries, its policy objectives centering on controlling inflows, restricting long-term stays, discouraging permanent residence and limiting citizenship.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lot
    With an estimated 200,000 illegal residents via visa overstay (the route of about half of US illegals) and 100,000 more legal migrant workers coming every year, it will get to a point where the illegals blend in, or become too important to influential employers to deport.

    I envy having South Korea's immigration problem rather than our own, but they are far from a model case.
  139. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    After all of the carnage of the last decade it is still impossible to get an ass kicking masculine leader elected in western Europe!

    Think about it. The estrogen filled voters cannot relate to a tough leader who will actually fix the problem. He’s too “scary”…

    Repulsive straight fag limp wrist leadership until the end of time apparently! Vive Macron! Et al.

    Read More
  140. @carol
    The euros' stupid denial and reflexive non judgementalism shows me just how terrified they are. Speaking out now could get you beheaded

    “The euros’ stupid denial and reflexive non judgementalism shows me just how terrified they are. Speaking out now could get you beheaded”

    No, these are true believers. They are not terrified, they are deluded.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Stockholm Syndrome?
    , @Buzz Mohawk
    They are deluded and terrified -- by their own governments.

    Speakers and writers in Europe can pretty easily come up against hate-speech laws and such. Write the wrong thing about non-European people, and you will be investigated. It is even harder there than it is in the US for citizens to come upon frank statements in media.

    Since most people in any group are conformists and followers, laws like that make it extra difficult for heretical truth to spread.

    The delusion is perpetuated by law.

    If we in America don't aggressively protect The First Amendment, if we don't categorically reject every proposal of anything resembling a hate-speech law, we will find ourselves in the same mental bind.

  141. @Dave Pinsen
    In the U.S., you'd think another terrorist attack would make people more inclined to vote for conservatives. In the U.K., bettors seem to think it will have the opposite effect in the upcoming snap election. Maybe anti-incumbency?
    https://twitter.com/dpinsen/status/871162622720307200

    n the U.S., you’d think another terrorist attack would make people more inclined to vote for conservatives. In the U.K., bettors seem to think it will have the opposite effect in the upcoming snap election. Maybe anti-incumbency?

    Unfortunately lady Conservatives just like lady Republicans in the US have absorbed the “compassionate conservative” ideal. Their goals are indistinguishable from those of the Left but they fight to achieve those goals a bit more slowly, with some empty talk of fiscal responsibility and tax cuts thrown in to fool the rubes.

    Look at Elizabeth Dole who converted Jesse Helms’ safe senate seat to Dem in just one term.
    Look at Nimrata Haley who as SC governor rushed to tear down any confederate flag within reach before the left even had a chance to bus in BLM rent-a-mobs.

    Marine LePen, the last rightwing hope for France was a similar disappointment, disavowing membership in her own party before the election in order to curry favor with people who hate her.

    Why would May, a dim non-entity who backed into the Prime Ministership through no skill or talent of her own be any different? talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory

    Read More
    • Replies: @whorefinder
    Putting their faith in a woman (La Pen) was a bad idea. The French were probably thinking of St. Joan of Arc, but she wasn't some middle aged, supremely-organized, long-in-wait French political actor and scion of the French Right, but a mystic visionary country girl who went by her lonesome and personally rallied the beleaguered troops to stunning victories because, quite frankly, the regular French establishment had failed them and was all but giving up to become a rump state and vassal of the English.

    The French, like the Brits, need to be led by men. Brave native French and British white men of traditional stock, non-gay, and of the traditional national religion. You'll note that Viktor Orban and Vladimir Putin and Bibi Netanyahu fit these bills, and their countries are achieving success. Trump is doing so here in America. Enough of this Theresa May-Marine Le Pen soft-feminism nonsense.

    If La Pen really wants her movement to succeed, she'll find a bold white Gallic straight Catholic French man and put him in charge. Enough of this female nonsense. If France needs a great female leader God will send her, just as he did St. Joan of Arc. Until then, He orders men to lead.
  142. @Kylie
    "The euros’ stupid denial and reflexive non judgementalism shows me just how terrified they are. Speaking out now could get you beheaded"

    No, these are true believers. They are not terrified, they are deluded.

    Stockholm Syndrome?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kylie
    Stockholm Syndrome? No. Just smug virtue-signaling. The left's veneration of NAMS allows them to feel superior to and contemptuous of conservative/lower-class whites.

    It's a winning combo platter for them. They will never voluntarily give it up.
  143. @anon
    Only if you bet me that leftists and the media will say this has nothing to do with islam.

    Care for a bit o sharia wif your fish n chips , mate ?

    If we don't allow in millions of "asians" and "mediteranians " , how the hell are we going to get kebabs and asian takeaway ? I mean the recipes are secret , difficult to recreate and totally unavailable on the internet.

    It’s worse than a sane person can even imagine or lampoon. I’m already getting whiffs of prog propaganda that these attacks have been staged by the Tories to influence tomorrow’s election.

    Read More
  144. @Daniel Chieh
    Europe wants to die. She's successfully implementing her strategy. Stop disturbing her.

    To be more exact, the elite seems to have that as their plan and much of the population appears to largely agree. There's nothing left to say, really. The world wars have killed all of the real men.

    Its really sad.There are tons of effective strategies, but none of them are being implemented. The will is wanting.

    Europeans today are living in a post-colonial world. Many of these countries, especially the UK and France, used to have impressive empires that spanned the globe that are now totally gone, with the exception of a couple islands here and there. To live in a society where they’re past their peak, it probably doesn’t seem like it is worth saving. The best days of their country are long since gone. It also explains why Eastern European countries have been dealing with immigration better than Western European countries: they finally have their countries back after centuries of being conquered and don’t want to give it up yet again to a foreign power.

    America is a little different because we’re still in Pax Americana so people are a little more aware of what is at stake, which is why Trump got elected.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    It also explains why Eastern European countries have been dealing with immigration better than Western European countries: they finally have their countries back after centuries of being conquered and don’t want to give it up yet again to a foreign power.

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.

    , @Frau Katze
    But America will catch up with Europe's Muslim numbers if someone doesn't stop them from coming.

    Trump can't even get a temporary from a handful of Muslims countries past the judges.
  145. Just reading this at a rural train station west of Tokyo after a hike in the mountains. My first thought was that all these terrorist events are absolutely unthinkable here. Poor Japanese people, deprived of all of the benefits of diversity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Well, to be fair, Japan does get doomsday cults of much greater efficiency when they do decide to go and kill people.
  146. @Steve Sailer
    My nephews found a super cheap trip to Paris right after the Bataclan massacre. But they said Paris was kind of grimy with all the migrants sitting everywhere. You get what you pay for...

    Still depends where you go. I went to the 5th Arr. after Bataclan. Tiny inexpensive hotel, fantastic food everywhere served by real French waiters. I didn’t see a MENA anywhere in nine days except a few sulking on Blvd. Saint Germain and one taking tickets behind the counter at the Louvre.

    I did see four man fire teams patroling with assault rifles, body armour, and paratrooper berets inside the Louvre, and an army truck pulled up on Saint Germain one afternoon and a dozen soldiers jumped out. The officer forbade me to take a photo after I asked politely.

    But then on the plane from there to visit my relatives in Scotland I sat behind a bearded man in a man dress reading Hadiths from a stack of photocopies, and on my way home to Canada I sat beside a woman in a hijab who successfully landed the aircraft by praying loudly besides me as cross winds buffeted us.

    Read More
  147. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Greasy William
    When you guys bash Islam you are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non Muslims.

    We are going to get mass immigration anyway so it is better that it be Islamic because Muslims alienate the public so much more. Also Muslims are much more of a threat to Globalism than any of us will ever be.

    “you guys are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non-Muslims.”

    No. Mass immigration is NOT “fine” at all. And immigration of Muslims is the absolute worst of all.

    Read More
  148. @rw95
    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    Absolutely right … nothing will change. There will be more concerts and other public events to express everyone’s solidarity with everyone else. There will be public huggings (rather than hangings). There will be gigabytes of tweets offering condolences to the victims and their families with pleas to remind everyone that not all Muslims are terrorists.

    The above, of course, is useless virtue signaling. It makes people feel better about something they will do nothing about. MI5 got the problem right after Manchester: There are already up to 20,000 suspected terrorists hiding within Britain’s Muslim immigrant communities … and it can only monitor and track 3,000 of them at a time. Given the relatively high Muslim birth rate, this ratio will get worse as years go by. In short, it is too late to doing anything about Islamic terrorism in Britain or anywhere else in Western Europe.

    This should have been foreseen … but maybe not. This is the new European society populated by radical feminists and gelded “cucks” making concrete progress in establishing a New World Order. As a generalization, the anti-natalist New World Order is led by childless feminists and male homosexuals who for years have been arranging, via mass immigration, the intentional atomization of society with the most diverse social and religious demographic they could organize. A permanent but tolerable level of terrorism on the part of Muslim immigrant communities is now de rigueur across the entire continent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @415 reasons
    It is of course not too late to completely solve the problem, in principle. Special wartime laws that would allow for mass deportation of all citizens who are descended from migrants from Islamic countries.

    Needless to say, that is completely beyond the pale of discourse in Europe or America. Perhaps when these attacks happen with a latency of once a day or more than once a day instead of once every 10-20 days the Overton window can slide a bit.
  149. @Random Dude on the Internet
    Europeans today are living in a post-colonial world. Many of these countries, especially the UK and France, used to have impressive empires that spanned the globe that are now totally gone, with the exception of a couple islands here and there. To live in a society where they're past their peak, it probably doesn't seem like it is worth saving. The best days of their country are long since gone. It also explains why Eastern European countries have been dealing with immigration better than Western European countries: they finally have their countries back after centuries of being conquered and don't want to give it up yet again to a foreign power.

    America is a little different because we're still in Pax Americana so people are a little more aware of what is at stake, which is why Trump got elected.

    It also explains why Eastern European countries have been dealing with immigration better than Western European countries: they finally have their countries back after centuries of being conquered and don’t want to give it up yet again to a foreign power.

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lot

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.
     
    Wait I though the Jews were the ones who got the East Euros to go communist. Retard anti-Semites can never get their stories straight.
    , @Whiskey
    Yes, turning France into Algeria on the Rhone is so good for Jews. Its so good, that France in a few years will be totally "Jundenrein" something that not even Hitler could achieve. Or maybe, just maybe, HBD explains it all. To be blunt, there is something very, very wrong with White people -- our women.

    Whites are evolved from an HBD perspective to treat our women well, by being Beta Males. Beta Maledom is innate and a massively sexually selected characteristic. This worked well before the pill, condom, welfare, increased female earnings, and anonymous urban living made White Beta Maledom about as adaptive as the Lindy and 23 Skiddo.

    White women, and ESPECIALLY White Upper Class women, have decided their men are lacking, and no longer needing or wanting Beta Male Provisioning, have decided to replace us with violent, low IQ Third Worlders, especially Africans and Muslims.





    If you put most White women somewhere on the spectrum between Cackle Pants Hillary and her HATE HATE HATE of you deplorables, and Amanda Palmer, common law wife of Neil Gaiman, acclaimed author with millions of global fans, who wrote a fawning "love poem" to Dhokar Tsarnaev, you would not be far wrong. After all, the nurses at Tsarnaev's hospital allegedly got into a fight over who would take care of that sexy, wounded bad boy. Women around the Tsarnaev's knew who they were, and that's why they were all over them. The older dead one even has an Alpha Widow to go along with his actual widow.

    The rapes, the murder, the slavery, the misery are a feature not a bug of Islam and Muslims and most White women WANT WANT WANT it like an extra dose of a fat-hiding burqua and that sexy male dominance. Women despise male intelligence as much as they prize male violence and dominance. Heck the more Muslims rape and murder in the West the more White women defend them. To anyone who is depressingly familiar with female nature (and nothing is more depressing) then this is absolutely predictable.

    If the story of the West up to the 1950's was utter dominance based on massing lots of industrious, hard working, willing to die in shock battle or wars of attrition, not to mention cooperative and high trust men, based on the rewards of a woman freely choosing them in exchange for beta male provisioning, the story of Western collapse is that of White women deciding they'll go all-in for the Bad Boy experience and viewing their men as obsolete.

    TL:DR, the pill and condom make the West obsolete and abolished.

    Thought experiment -- if every White dude on the planet resembled a cast member from Sons of Anarchy, how quickly would Muslims in the West be expelled, along with most non-Whites? Two months? Three at most?

    This attack almost certainly puts Corbyn over the top, as most White women WANT to surrender to the most dominant male group which is Muslims, and Corbyn is the candidate of surrender to Islam.

    Bottom line: Harley Quinn, literally a serial killer groupie, is a "feminist hero." If the West is to survive anywhere it is imperative that almost all White men treat our women as a biker fully patched member would, or worse. Its what they want and the only way to get them to buy in to siding with us instead of the stronger horse.
  150. @Yan Shen
    I'm attempting to reason with the liberals on Slate by suggesting that countries like the UK follow the example of a Japan or South Korea. Honestly at this point I sound like a broken record both here and on other blogs, but I suspect that large parts of the world could benefit from embracing an East Asian mentality on all sorts of real life issues ranging from education to immigration.

    Keeping borders secure and avoiding foreign entanglements were political mainstays just a few years ago. Oh, for the good old days! Isolationism is a great tradition when you have fish to your east and west and no military powers to your north or south.

    Read More
  151. @Random Dude on the Internet
    The alt right oddly enough also seems to be backing Corbyn over May. Partly because of accelerationism and partly because it seems like UKIP has totally deflated since Farage stepping down the first time. It is shocking how incompetent May has been as a PM, not because I figured she would do better, it's more that she's just that incompetent that it continues to surprise.

    Why the hell did Farage step down?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Random Dude on the Internet
    After Brexit happened, he basically said, "I've done all I wanted to achieve" and stepped down. Then he went back to being a leader after UKIP collapsed and then left again in a matter of weeks, resulting in UKIP collapsing again. A totally bungled operation that gave people little or no confidence in UKIP. So now anyone conservative is throwing their lot in with the Tories who are being led by the least competent Prime Minister since the late 1970s.
  152. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @anonymous
    Walls don't work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.

    Right. Walls don’t work. That’s why the Han never built the great wall of China. The Romans took a pass on building Hadrian’s wall and there are no castles or fortresses throughout Europe from the middle ages.

    Btw, you ever try pulling a 26 foot ladder up by yourself and putting it on the other side? Just the seven foot high walls of Hougoumont kept out 10,000 French troops at Waterloo sport.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    The Berlin Wall seemed to work pretty well.
    , @Random Dude on the Internet
    Not to mention the symbolic value of having the wall. Does anonymous really believe that low end Latin Americans, who probably have a 85 IQ at best (they're not sending their best), will come up with an effective enough scheme to get over a big, beautiful wall? Does anonymous also not think that you can't have border patrols along the wall? Heck, with technology being as cheap as it is you could probably have sensors that could send drones to perform a preliminary investigation and if it detects human movement, border patrol agents can be dispatched to the site.

    The defeatism being shown here is utterly pathetic. It's sad that there are some people who think the only situation is to roll over and get taken over. Sad!
    , @Peter Akuleyev
    The Great Wall was a notorious failure, horrible example.
    , @Buck Turgidson
    I would pay a lot of $$ to watch Janet Napolitano scale a 50-foot wall with her 51-foot ladder. The descent would be epic (and seismic).
  153. @Moshe
    Come on. If you are going to premeditated give your life for an attack that you are not commanded to do by your superior officer and that has virtually no chance of survival... wouldn't you want to actually accomplish something instead of just doing the same thing that 50 other guys did before you while accomplishing nothing?

    It is imposing a cost on the British people for their aggression against Muslims in the Middle East. Basic tit for tat game strategy. Highly rational.

    The strategy does assume that the British are rational and sentient and sovereign. If they were, they would cease their aggression there, direct and indirect.

    Read More
    • Replies: @syonredux

    It is imposing a cost on the British people for their aggression against Muslims in the Middle East. Basic tit for tat game strategy. Highly rational.
     
    As I keep on pointing out to you, it's actually quite irrational. In exchange for a little chaos , Muslims are being given the opportunity to both invade Europe and to exterminate Christianity in the Middle East....

    Really, this is the most glorious moment for Islam since the Rightly Guided Caliphs.

    The strategy does assume that the British are rational and sentient and sovereign. If they were, they would cease their aggression there, direct and indirect.
     
    But that would also mean that the Brits would close their gates to Islam.....and that would rob Islam of its grand moment.....

    Remember, it's invade the world, invite the world. Can't have one without the other...
    , @Moshe
    Ah, you're overthinking things. You might say such a thing of Thinkers like BLadin but you're giving these small fry way too much credit.
  154. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @anon
    What the IRA terrorism did suggest, was that it wasn't a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century.
    Like the Muslims later on, they never assimilated and remained hostile to British people and their way of life.

    There is one flaw in your analogy sir. In the early 20th century Ireland was a part of the United Kingdom. This is not the case for the Muslim invaders. Kind of a home-grown terrorism vs an imported one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @whorefinder
    Which leads to the question of differing terrorist motivations:

    The IRA's motivations were clear: withdrawal of British rule from all of Ireland and thus independence of the entire island. The British could have ended the terrorism by acceding to the IRA's demands, though to their credit they didn't fold and were pretty firm.

    With Muslims, there are two motivations: (1) end of bombing of Muslim countries; and (2) complete Muslim-Sharia takeover of British/French/European countries. The British these days are so womanly they are rolling over and acceding to both.

    One can't help but point out again that Poland, Japan, Hungary aren't having any Muslim terrorist attacks. Guess what? They haven't taken in any Muslims.
  155. @anon
    What the IRA terrorism did suggest, was that it wasn't a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century.
    Like the Muslims later on, they never assimilated and remained hostile to British people and their way of life.

    it wasn’t a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century

    You assume the alternative would be no immigration. Capital demands cheap labor, so just as likely the Irish who did not come would have been replaced by Africans and South Asians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Completely unlikely to import Africans and South Asians in 1900.
    My point is that the Catholic Irish were [and are] a volatile and unassimilable people, and the response of The State of the time was to pander and accomodate them, to the detriment of the local people.
    The only thing that's changed is the religion and the race of the State's new pets.
  156. @NJ Transit Commuter
    Just reading this at a rural train station west of Tokyo after a hike in the mountains. My first thought was that all these terrorist events are absolutely unthinkable here. Poor Japanese people, deprived of all of the benefits of diversity.

    Well, to be fair, Japan does get doomsday cults of much greater efficiency when they do decide to go and kill people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    Well, to be fair, Japan does get doomsday cults of much greater efficiency when they do decide to go and kill people.
     
    The Aum Shinrikyo cult was pretty incompetent. Their total victim count was something like twenty people. One psychotic Korean can out perform that in an afternoon.

    If, however, you are talking about the military junta that governed Japan during WWII, you have a point.
    , @European-American
    The 1995 Tokyo subway sarin attack was the deadliest incident to occur in Japan since the end of World War II. The five coordinated attacks killed 12 people and injured 50. (Because it evaporates so quickly, sarin presents an immediate but short-lived threat.)

    There were also a few other attacks and murders by Aum Shinrikyo, but all in all I'd hardly call that "much greater efficiency"...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aum_Shinrikyo#Incidents_before_1995

    Worst terrorist strikes--worldwide, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston:
    http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255i.html

    Unless you're referencing the crimes of imperial Japan?... Those are indeed in the same league as some of humanity's worst.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimes#List_of_major_crimes

  157. @Opinionator
    It also explains why Eastern European countries have been dealing with immigration better than Western European countries: they finally have their countries back after centuries of being conquered and don’t want to give it up yet again to a foreign power.

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.

    Wait I though the Jews were the ones who got the East Euros to go communist. Retard anti-Semites can never get their stories straight.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    You appear to have your centuries mixed up.
    , @whorefinder

    Wait I though the Jews were the ones who got the East Euros to go communist.
     
    They did, and then famously Stalin turned on them and began purging them, leading to death and emigration to Israel. And as communism became unpopular as the decades rolled on, the Semitic drive behind communism led to a backlash in Eastern Europe and Jews became very unwelcome there. Dude, do you even history?

    Retard anti-Semites can never get their stories straight.
     
    Retard Semitic apologists never can logic much.
    , @al gore rhythms
    The Jewish demographic in Eastern Europe has diminished a great deal since about 1940.

    There will probably be quite a large section in your local library dealing with this if you are interested.
  158. @anon
    Right. Walls don't work. That's why the Han never built the great wall of China. The Romans took a pass on building Hadrian's wall and there are no castles or fortresses throughout Europe from the middle ages.

    Btw, you ever try pulling a 26 foot ladder up by yourself and putting it on the other side? Just the seven foot high walls of Hougoumont kept out 10,000 French troops at Waterloo sport.

    The Berlin Wall seemed to work pretty well.

    Read More
  159. @Lot

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.
     
    Wait I though the Jews were the ones who got the East Euros to go communist. Retard anti-Semites can never get their stories straight.

    You appear to have your centuries mixed up.

    Read More
  160. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Opinionator
    ...and the murders we have committed in the Middle East.

    Lets assume you are right. Just for argument’s sake. They still couldn’t kill British people in Britain if they couldn’t get INSIDE into Britain. So it really is the open immigration policies as the cause.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    Mass immigration makes it easy for our acts of aggression to trigger acts of retaliatory violence here, because there are significant pools of people in place here who sympathise with the victims of our military aggression, ready to act. But it isn't true that no mass immigration means no retaliation.

    In the C19th and before, European nations could happily slaughter Africans and Asians completely safe from retaliation in our own countries, because the means for such retaliation simply were not available to the victims. As technological advance and the spread of the industrial revolution and its consequences has shrunk the world, making travel easier and multiplying the killing force available to individuals and small groups, this has become ever less true. In the mid-C20th, the resistance to the imposition of Israel on the ME led to plenty of terrorism by mostly secularist, socialist and nationalist groups, without much need for mass immigration to western states. The world has become a lot smaller since then.

    Ending mass immigration should be done because mass migration is inherently harmful, not out of fear of terrorism. It will also reduce the amount of terrorism our policies generate. But it won't end it, that's for sure. Maybe nothing will, completely. But the correct policies nevertheless are:

    Controlled borders and limited migration
    No more interventionist wars of aggression and regime change interference
    Strong military, used only for genuine defence, not "preventive" aggression dressed up as defence
  161. @Opinionator
    Why the hell did Farage step down?

    After Brexit happened, he basically said, “I’ve done all I wanted to achieve” and stepped down. Then he went back to being a leader after UKIP collapsed and then left again in a matter of weeks, resulting in UKIP collapsing again. A totally bungled operation that gave people little or no confidence in UKIP. So now anyone conservative is throwing their lot in with the Tories who are being led by the least competent Prime Minister since the late 1970s.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Thanks. It's inexplicable behavior. Does he truly want Brexit to succeed or not?
  162. I don’t care about the dead White scum. The main thing is that we stop naighty Alt Right trolls from using this to promote Islamophobia. They don’t see hiw our Third World friends haveade our siciety so Vibrannt & Diverse.

    #StandUpForDiversity

    Read More
  163. @jesse helms think-alike

    n the U.S., you’d think another terrorist attack would make people more inclined to vote for conservatives. In the U.K., bettors seem to think it will have the opposite effect in the upcoming snap election. Maybe anti-incumbency?
     
    Unfortunately lady Conservatives just like lady Republicans in the US have absorbed the "compassionate conservative" ideal. Their goals are indistinguishable from those of the Left but they fight to achieve those goals a bit more slowly, with some empty talk of fiscal responsibility and tax cuts thrown in to fool the rubes.

    Look at Elizabeth Dole who converted Jesse Helms' safe senate seat to Dem in just one term.
    Look at Nimrata Haley who as SC governor rushed to tear down any confederate flag within reach before the left even had a chance to bus in BLM rent-a-mobs.

    Marine LePen, the last rightwing hope for France was a similar disappointment, disavowing membership in her own party before the election in order to curry favor with people who hate her.

    Why would May, a dim non-entity who backed into the Prime Ministership through no skill or talent of her own be any different? talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory

    Putting their faith in a woman (La Pen) was a bad idea. The French were probably thinking of St. Joan of Arc, but she wasn’t some middle aged, supremely-organized, long-in-wait French political actor and scion of the French Right, but a mystic visionary country girl who went by her lonesome and personally rallied the beleaguered troops to stunning victories because, quite frankly, the regular French establishment had failed them and was all but giving up to become a rump state and vassal of the English.

    The French, like the Brits, need to be led by men. Brave native French and British white men of traditional stock, non-gay, and of the traditional national religion. You’ll note that Viktor Orban and Vladimir Putin and Bibi Netanyahu fit these bills, and their countries are achieving success. Trump is doing so here in America. Enough of this Theresa May-Marine Le Pen soft-feminism nonsense.

    If La Pen really wants her movement to succeed, she’ll find a bold white Gallic straight Catholic French man and put him in charge. Enough of this female nonsense. If France needs a great female leader God will send her, just as he did St. Joan of Arc. Until then, He orders men to lead.

    Read More
    • Replies: @European-American
    True, but in Western Europe the barriers to such "brave native white men of traditional stock, non-gay, and of the traditional national religion" seem high.

    It's no coincidence that strong right-wing or populist stances are often defended by Jewish intellectuals, or gays, or women (off the top of my head Zemmour, Finkielkraut, Pim Fortuyn, Florian Philippot, Frauke Petry, Margaret Thatcher (?). You can't easily call such people Nazis, so they can express ideas that would not otherwise be allowed to be aired.

    The US (and the UK?) don't have quite as strict a prohibition, since they were never fascist.

    (by the way "La Pen" is a handy shorthand which I hadn't run across, nice! But what would we call Marion... Le Pen, La Pen, ... Bébé Pen? Lait Pen?)
    , @Frau Katze
    Geert Wilders in the Netherlands has had even less success than Le Pen.

    I don't think it have mattered a bit if there had been a male Le Pen.

    Macron has what can only be described as an "unusual" marriage but that didn't slow him down.

    Nope, it's policy alone people are voting on.
    , @Mika-Non
    Perhaps. Or perhaps Simone of Calais ("The Death of Civilization") should be their candidate.
    , @Anonymous

    If La Pen really wants her movement to succeed, she’ll find a bold white Gallic straight Catholic French man and put him in charge.
     
    Lol, I started reading your comment and was just about to ask where these brave men are hiding, and then this crap. Not much of a bold go-getter if he needs Le Pen to search for him and hold his hand.
  164. @Johann Ricke

    Aside from foreign brides, the number of foreign migrant labors in South Korea is growing very rapidly.
     
    While the number of foreign workers is increasing, the principal route towards permanent residence appears to be marriage to a Korean citizen, and there's no mention of either chain migration or routine annual immigration quotas (permanent residence permits leading to citizenship):

    Despite all the indications that the country is rapidly becoming a multicultural society, the Korean government still insists on almost zero-immigration. In contrast to such “immigration countries” as the United States, Canada, and Australia that have extended citizenship to many new residents and encouraged their integration and assimilation, Korea remains a “non-immigration” country, much like Japan and many Western European countries, its policy objectives centering on controlling inflows, restricting long-term stays, discouraging permanent residence and limiting citizenship.
     

    With an estimated 200,000 illegal residents via visa overstay (the route of about half of US illegals) and 100,000 more legal migrant workers coming every year, it will get to a point where the illegals blend in, or become too important to influential employers to deport.

    I envy having South Korea’s immigration problem rather than our own, but they are far from a model case.

    Read More
  165. @anon
    Right. Walls don't work. That's why the Han never built the great wall of China. The Romans took a pass on building Hadrian's wall and there are no castles or fortresses throughout Europe from the middle ages.

    Btw, you ever try pulling a 26 foot ladder up by yourself and putting it on the other side? Just the seven foot high walls of Hougoumont kept out 10,000 French troops at Waterloo sport.

    Not to mention the symbolic value of having the wall. Does anonymous really believe that low end Latin Americans, who probably have a 85 IQ at best (they’re not sending their best), will come up with an effective enough scheme to get over a big, beautiful wall? Does anonymous also not think that you can’t have border patrols along the wall? Heck, with technology being as cheap as it is you could probably have sensors that could send drones to perform a preliminary investigation and if it detects human movement, border patrol agents can be dispatched to the site.

    The defeatism being shown here is utterly pathetic. It’s sad that there are some people who think the only situation is to roll over and get taken over. Sad!

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    The defeatism being shown here is utterly pathetic. It’s sad that there are some people who think the only situation is to roll over and get taken over.
     
    It's not defeatism - the people doing it *want* the destruction of the West and so they haunt forums where they can blackpill people.

    I do the same thing (in reverse) on SJW forums.
    , @Jack Hanson
    For examples, see any thread on Trump here.
  166. @Lot

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.
     
    Wait I though the Jews were the ones who got the East Euros to go communist. Retard anti-Semites can never get their stories straight.

    Wait I though the Jews were the ones who got the East Euros to go communist.

    They did, and then famously Stalin turned on them and began purging them, leading to death and emigration to Israel. And as communism became unpopular as the decades rolled on, the Semitic drive behind communism led to a backlash in Eastern Europe and Jews became very unwelcome there. Dude, do you even history?

    Retard anti-Semites can never get their stories straight.

    Retard Semitic apologists never can logic much.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Whiskey
    Blaming Jews for the fall of the West is like burning your neighbor for hexing you with an illness. It might feel good but won't do much to fix your illness. Whereas a dose of penicillin might just do the trick, or surgery ...

    Eastern Europe had always been a hostile place for Jews, and Western Europe more amenable. Ironically Germany before WWI had been fairly friendly towards Jews, there were many Jews who went to the gas chambers wearing their Iron Crosses thinking that their service for the Kaiser would save them. It did not. By contrast there were few Jews who sought out service in Russia.

    Eastern Europe went Communist because Stalin's forces rolled over them and conquered them after Hitler had conquered them first (Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia) or had been defeated as Hitler's allies of convenience (Romania, Hungary). Just as they were conquered by the Ottomans, and then the Austrians and Russians before. In all cases the fundamental issue was military weakness caused by unfavorable geography, lack of military ability, and financial/material weakness. It sucks to be weak and poor and with little help in geography for defense. Places like Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Romania were not exactly known for their friendliness to Communism in the 1930s. Which was imposed by Soviet Occupation after 1945.





    The fundamental problem is that most Western women want life as a Manson Family groupie*, and Muslims (and Africans) offer that option, in the way that too intelligent, too beta male Western Men do not.

    China has the same problems the West has with Muslim terrorism, there is hardly a month that goes by that does not feature a knife/vehicle attack or a homemade bomb. These things are well known in China in the "undernews" but rarely make it into the West and are heavily censored in China. Eventually some Communist Princeling will make a play for Emperor as the Defender of the Han against Hui (Han Muslims) and Uighur Muslim attacks and either succeed to the Heavenly Throne or provoke the Sitting Emperor to kick out or kill most of China's Muslims.

    *If women had no control over their fertility, depended on beta male provisioning for survival of themselves and their children, and had severe limits on bad-boy-apolooza, things would be different but that is not going to happen ever since there is zero likelihood of banning such simple technology.

    Rather than super-complicated neo-Copernican ideas of perfect circular orbits of planets with mini orbits within orbits, the most parsimonious explanation of why Eastern Europe is less Muslim afflicted is that their men treat women worse, and thus their women like them better. The treatment and status of women would have I'd bet an R^2 of about .8 in the attitudes and desire for substantial Non-White immavasion. That famous Irish Savant photo of the club in Sweden that only admits White women and African men with no shortage of either group is pretty telling. White women make out fine with mass Third World immigration, White men not so much and that's the entire point. There is no end to the ways in which White men and Women are the enemy post-pill and condom and either one or the other will be vanquished (or perhaps both).
    , @Lot

    communism led to a backlash in Eastern Europe and Jews became very unwelcome there
     
    Lolwut? Do you mean in your dreams? I must have missed those big pogroms after the Berlin Wall fell.

    The only people who don't like Jews are Muslims, their far-left Western allies, and Nazi retards. Normal Americans, Europeans, and Asians like Jews.

    , @Johann Ricke

    And as communism became unpopular as the decades rolled on, the Semitic drive behind communism led to a backlash in Eastern Europe and Jews became very unwelcome there. Dude, do you even history?
     
    Communism isn't unpopular in Eastern Europe. They don't like Russian occupation and they don't like the shortages, but they like the idea of Communism. A good chunk of Communist-era social programs and restrictions on private enterprise are still in existence, which is why their economies are not growing in leaps and bounds the way the East Asian tigers were, even decades after the fall of the Berlin wall. Note that this is despite the huge advantage of their close proximity to the US and Western European markets.

    And as to Jews, as cognitive elites, they were over-represented among the commissar class just as they were over-represented among the business and intellectual elites who suffered greatly under communism. The latter fled the region in great numbers, much like their less-persecuted non-Jewish brethren.

    Apart from the prophylactic wars we fought in Korea and Vietnam, Communism turned out great for us, though. We got some of the Eastern bloc's best minds - the more notable of which were people like the founders of Intel and Google, who would never have left their homelands if they weren't such basket cases, thanks to Communism.
    , @Malcolm X-Lax
    Many of the former Soviet-era Russian jews who didn't immigrate to israel, immigrated to the US. These jews received a special preference because they WERE jews. Many of them now appear on the news and in newspapers calling any American racist who suggests we institute a preference for Middle Eastern Christians, who are having their heads chopped off.
  167. @anon
    There is one flaw in your analogy sir. In the early 20th century Ireland was a part of the United Kingdom. This is not the case for the Muslim invaders. Kind of a home-grown terrorism vs an imported one.

    Which leads to the question of differing terrorist motivations:

    The IRA’s motivations were clear: withdrawal of British rule from all of Ireland and thus independence of the entire island. The British could have ended the terrorism by acceding to the IRA’s demands, though to their credit they didn’t fold and were pretty firm.

    With Muslims, there are two motivations: (1) end of bombing of Muslim countries; and (2) complete Muslim-Sharia takeover of British/French/European countries. The British these days are so womanly they are rolling over and acceding to both.

    One can’t help but point out again that Poland, Japan, Hungary aren’t having any Muslim terrorist attacks. Guess what? They haven’t taken in any Muslims.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    With Muslims, there are two motivations: (1) end of bombing of Muslim countries; and (2) complete Muslim-Sharia takeover of British/French/European countries.

    The explanation they repeatedly give for their attacks on Western targets relates almost exclusively to (1). Moreover, these attacks tend to fruatrate the objective you allege in (2), inasmuch as they increase the probability that Muslim immigration will face greater restrictions.
  168. A few points to discuss:

    1. The UK’s recent terrorist attacks are not caused by refugees, but by Muslims born in the UK or who immigrated under normal UK immigration laws.

    2. Almost every terrorist attack in Europe in the last few years has been executed by North Africans. Turks and Pakistani immigrants reduce quality of life in other ways but they don’t go in for suicide bombings. Why are North Africans so much more violent and angry than other Muslims?

    3. Always fun to note the number of terrorist attacks in Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic, i.e. zero. On the other hand Austria and Italy have disfunctional immigrant Muslim populations but no significant terrorist attacks yet. But again see point two. We don’t have a lot of North Africans in Austria.

    4. Trump’s poorly targeted travel ban does nothing to address actual threats to the US. Iranians, if anything, seem like the most desirable Muslim immigrants.

    5. Long term, immigration from Sub Saharan Africa is a far bigger threat to civilization than “Muslim” immigration.

    Read More
    • Agree: European-American
    • Replies: @BRF
    Good points Mr Akuleyev

    Self combustion seems to be a Sunni specialty, are there known examples of similar Shia contributions?
    , @for-the-record
    All very good points. Absent a time machine, there is no short-term solution, and the long-term outlook (for Western Europe at least) is even more depressing.
    , @Erik Sieven
    very good points, especially the last one. Although taking the global perspective North Africans are by far not the only problem. Look at China, India, South East Asia, Pakistan, East Africa, West Africa. Though Shiites really are a much smaller problem than Sunnis. Iranian immigrants are good, especially those who left Iran because of the the Islamic Revolution.
    , @anon

    1. The UK’s recent terrorist attacks are not caused by refugees, but by Muslims born in the UK or who immigrated under normal UK immigration laws.
     
    they are all caused by immigration of incompatible groups - refugees, legal immigrants, illehal immigrants - it's all the same

    3. Always fun to note the number of terrorist attacks in Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic, i.e. zero.
     
    right - immigration, legal, illegal or refugee

    4. Trump’s poorly targeted travel ban does nothing to address actual threats to the US.
     
    yes it does - because the threat is caused by immigration of incompatible groups
    , @Parbes
    "Why are North Africans so much more violent and angry than other Muslims?"

    Because, in addition to being Muslims, they are mostly Arab-Negro mongrels.

    An ancillary reason: Their ancestors in previous centuries had a history of invading and/or raiding and pillaging parts of Western Europe - the Iberian peninsula, Southern France, and parts of Italy, to be exact. What's more, THEY AND THEIR CLERICS/LEADERS ARE AWARE OF THAT. So in a sense, they are just recapitulating a (for them) time-honored historical practice.
    , @Rod1963
    Iranians are not desirable for the fact they are Muslim and have no loyalty to the U.S. whatsoever. They are only nice because they're numbers are small and they are Shiaa and hated by the Sunni community.

    We don't need or want Muslims. They are not a value added immigrant group. They have their own country, let them stay there.
  169. @Opinionator
    It is imposing a cost on the British people for their aggression against Muslims in the Middle East. Basic tit for tat game strategy. Highly rational.

    The strategy does assume that the British are rational and sentient and sovereign. If they were, they would cease their aggression there, direct and indirect.

    It is imposing a cost on the British people for their aggression against Muslims in the Middle East. Basic tit for tat game strategy. Highly rational.

    As I keep on pointing out to you, it’s actually quite irrational. In exchange for a little chaos , Muslims are being given the opportunity to both invade Europe and to exterminate Christianity in the Middle East….

    Really, this is the most glorious moment for Islam since the Rightly Guided Caliphs.

    The strategy does assume that the British are rational and sentient and sovereign. If they were, they would cease their aggression there, direct and indirect.

    But that would also mean that the Brits would close their gates to Islam…..and that would rob Islam of its grand moment…..

    Remember, it’s invade the world, invite the world. Can’t have one without the other…

    Read More
  170. @anon
    Right. Walls don't work. That's why the Han never built the great wall of China. The Romans took a pass on building Hadrian's wall and there are no castles or fortresses throughout Europe from the middle ages.

    Btw, you ever try pulling a 26 foot ladder up by yourself and putting it on the other side? Just the seven foot high walls of Hougoumont kept out 10,000 French troops at Waterloo sport.

    The Great Wall was a notorious failure, horrible example.

    Read More
  171. @Opinionator
    ...and the murders we have committed in the Middle East.

    Tonight’s event was another Islamist massacre of Whites in London. It was caused by open immigration policies, cultural relativism, and political correctness.

    …and the murders we have committed in the Middle East.

    MMMM, clip-paste….Invade the world, invite the world.

    I assume that things will settle down once St Peter’s and St Paul’s are converted to mosques, and every Muslim has his quota of pubescent European girls to rape……

    Read More
  172. @Kylie
    "The euros’ stupid denial and reflexive non judgementalism shows me just how terrified they are. Speaking out now could get you beheaded"

    No, these are true believers. They are not terrified, they are deluded.

    They are deluded and terrified — by their own governments.

    Speakers and writers in Europe can pretty easily come up against hate-speech laws and such. Write the wrong thing about non-European people, and you will be investigated. It is even harder there than it is in the US for citizens to come upon frank statements in media.

    Since most people in any group are conformists and followers, laws like that make it extra difficult for heretical truth to spread.

    The delusion is perpetuated by law.

    If we in America don’t aggressively protect The First Amendment, if we don’t categorically reject every proposal of anything resembling a hate-speech law, we will find ourselves in the same mental bind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kylie
    Sorry, Buzz, I should have been more specific. I think the elites in government, academia and the media are deluded true believers. The rest probably are terrified or, at the very least, cowed into submission.

    To this day, after eight years, even my closest friends don't know I post here. But I'm not cowed, just cautious!
  173. @Random Dude on the Internet
    After Brexit happened, he basically said, "I've done all I wanted to achieve" and stepped down. Then he went back to being a leader after UKIP collapsed and then left again in a matter of weeks, resulting in UKIP collapsing again. A totally bungled operation that gave people little or no confidence in UKIP. So now anyone conservative is throwing their lot in with the Tories who are being led by the least competent Prime Minister since the late 1970s.

    Thanks. It’s inexplicable behavior. Does he truly want Brexit to succeed or not?

    Read More
  174. @Opinionator
    It is imposing a cost on the British people for their aggression against Muslims in the Middle East. Basic tit for tat game strategy. Highly rational.

    The strategy does assume that the British are rational and sentient and sovereign. If they were, they would cease their aggression there, direct and indirect.

    Ah, you’re overthinking things. You might say such a thing of Thinkers like BLadin but you’re giving these small fry way too much credit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Motivations of the 2005 London bombers, from the horses' mouths:

    Tanweer said this –

    What have you witnessed now is only the beginning of a string of attacks that will continue and become stronger until you pull your forces out of Afghanistan and Iraq. And until you stop your financial and military support to America and Israel.

    Khan said this -

    Your democratically-elected governments continuously perpetuate atrocities against my people all over the world. And your support of them makes you directly responsible, just as I am directly responsible for protecting and avenging my Muslim brothers and sisters. Until we feel security you will be our targets and until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture of my people we will not stop this fight. We are at war and I am a soldier. Now you too will taste the reality of this situation.
    , @whorefinder
    Opinionator is a paid troll, probably Saudi in origin, or perhaps Media Matters. Everything bad about Muslims is always caused by our bombing the Middle East, according to him. Islam is a religion of peace, I tell you!
  175. @lavoisier
    The population had a chance to stop the madness in France and they elected the traitorous bastard Macron. The people who choose to be manipulated by their hostile elites deserve the hells they have brought on themselves.

    When will the Anglo-Saxon begin to hate?

    When will the Anglo-Saxon begin to hate?

    Increasingly, it’s looking like the answer is “never”. Or, if not that, then “when he’s already hopelessly outnumbered and overrun”.

    Read More
  176. @whorefinder
    Which leads to the question of differing terrorist motivations:

    The IRA's motivations were clear: withdrawal of British rule from all of Ireland and thus independence of the entire island. The British could have ended the terrorism by acceding to the IRA's demands, though to their credit they didn't fold and were pretty firm.

    With Muslims, there are two motivations: (1) end of bombing of Muslim countries; and (2) complete Muslim-Sharia takeover of British/French/European countries. The British these days are so womanly they are rolling over and acceding to both.

    One can't help but point out again that Poland, Japan, Hungary aren't having any Muslim terrorist attacks. Guess what? They haven't taken in any Muslims.

    With Muslims, there are two motivations: (1) end of bombing of Muslim countries; and (2) complete Muslim-Sharia takeover of British/French/European countries.

    The explanation they repeatedly give for their attacks on Western targets relates almost exclusively to (1). Moreover, these attacks tend to fruatrate the objective you allege in (2), inasmuch as they increase the probability that Muslim immigration will face greater restrictions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @whorefinder

    The explanation they repeatedly give for their attacks on Western targets relates almost exclusively to (1).
     
    Nope. Muslims, especially as their percentage of the population has grown, have increasingly called for national sharia law take overs.


    Moreover, these attacks tend to fruatrate the objective you allege in (2), inasmuch as they increase the probability that Muslim immigration will face greater restrictions.
     
    You're imputing logic upon goat molesters. And you also fail to note their attacks have only opened borders FURTHER in the countries they attack. Even simpletons like these 9th century barbarians can see they are gaining power the more they push for it.
    , @syonredux

    With Muslims, there are two motivations: (1) end of bombing of Muslim countries; and (2) complete Muslim-Sharia takeover of British/French/European countries.

    The explanation they repeatedly give for their attacks on Western targets relates almost exclusively to (1). Moreover, these attacks tend to fruatrate the objective you allege in (2), inasmuch as they increase the probability that Muslim immigration will face greater restrictions.
     
    Nah. The SJW narrative demands that we take in more Muslims after terrorist attacks. If we don't, that means that we are surrendering to "hate."
  177. To me, the logical thing to do, to stop the situation from worsening, would be to halt all islamic immigration until we can find out what is going on.

    Surely I can’t be the first person to have thought of this?

    Read More
  178. @Peter Akuleyev
    A few points to discuss:

    1. The UK's recent terrorist attacks are not caused by refugees, but by Muslims born in the UK or who immigrated under normal UK immigration laws.

    2. Almost every terrorist attack in Europe in the last few years has been executed by North Africans. Turks and Pakistani immigrants reduce quality of life in other ways but they don't go in for suicide bombings. Why are North Africans so much more violent and angry than other Muslims?

    3. Always fun to note the number of terrorist attacks in Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic, i.e. zero. On the other hand Austria and Italy have disfunctional immigrant Muslim populations but no significant terrorist attacks yet. But again see point two. We don't have a lot of North Africans in Austria.

    4. Trump's poorly targeted travel ban does nothing to address actual threats to the US. Iranians, if anything, seem like the most desirable Muslim immigrants.

    5. Long term, immigration from Sub Saharan Africa is a far bigger threat to civilization than "Muslim" immigration.

    Good points Mr Akuleyev

    Self combustion seems to be a Sunni specialty, are there known examples of similar Shia contributions?

    Read More
  179. @Greasy William
    When you guys bash Islam you are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non Muslims.

    We are going to get mass immigration anyway so it is better that it be Islamic because Muslims alienate the public so much more. Also Muslims are much more of a threat to Globalism than any of us will ever be.

    “We are going to get mass immigration anyway so it is better that it be Islamic because Muslims alienate the public so much more”

    Which you’re hoping leads to what? Ethnic cleansing?

    “Also Muslims are much more of a threat to Globalism than any of us will ever be”

    Okay, then Muslims kill and/or push out the globalists, and America is preserved. As a Muslim nation? Is that the plan?

    Read More
  180. @Greasy William
    When you guys bash Islam you are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non Muslims.

    We are going to get mass immigration anyway so it is better that it be Islamic because Muslims alienate the public so much more. Also Muslims are much more of a threat to Globalism than any of us will ever be.

    These Muslim terrorists are pushing their own form of globalism – a global Islamic caliphate. It’s a war between two globalisms, and were stuck in the Middle, like Poland in WWII.

    Read More
  181. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    The British people can voice their discontent at massive uncontrolled third world immigration by voting UKIP this coming Thursday – a viable, non-fascist, sensible policied political party.

    But they won’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @englishmike

    The British people can voice their discontent at massive uncontrolled third world immigration by voting UKIP this coming Thursday – a viable, non-fascist, sensible policied political party.
    But they won’t.

     

    One reason most of them won't is the "first-past-the-post" electoral system, which means that the total number of votes cast for a party's candidates does not translate into a corresponding number of Members of Parliament being elected.

    For example, I live in a "safe Tory constituency" – a geographical voting area which always elects a Tory by a very large majority of votes. If I want a Tory MP I know I shall get one without needing to vote. If I vote for the UKIP candidate, or anyone else, I know it is a wasted vote.

    As several newspapers reported after the 2015 General Election:


    While there were major Conservative and SNP victories in the 2015 election, everyone else on the political spectrum was grumbling about the first-past-the-post voting system.

    Ukip won 12.6 per cent of the vote and only managed to get one MP into parliament. By contrast, the Scottish National Party only got 4.7 per cent of the vote and returned 56 MPs. The Liberal Democrats won 7.8 per cent giving them 8 MPs.

    So what would today’s new parliament look like if we had a proportionally representative system?

    Under a proportional voting system the SNP’s landslide of 56 seats would have been reduced to 31 and the Lib Dems would not have been wiped out, retaining 51 seats instead of eight.

    Ukip would become the third biggest party in government with 82 seats and the Greens would have won 24 - a far cry from those parties' current tally of one seat each.


    From "Here's how the election results would look under a proportional voting system" (The Independent)

    However, even under a proportional system UKIP would have been the third largest party in parliament with limited influence on immigration policy or anything else.

    By contrast, Americans in 2016 had the option of electing a president on the basis of his declared policies on such important matters as "massive uncontrolled third world immigration".

    Let's see how that turns out.
  182. @Opinionator
    ...and the murders we have committed in the Middle East.

    It’s time to stop using one half of Invade/Invite to argue against our right and responsibility to protect ourselves.

    When you decide to invade people, the smart thing to do is not to allow them into your country.

    Every other race on Earth puts its own kind ahead of others, and every other race has invaded others at one time or another. Repeated retorts like “…and the murders we have committed in the Middle East” are getting old.

    They would invade us anyway, if given the chance, as they have done in the past.

    Read More
    • Agree: Auntie Analogue
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Let's grant the objective to "not invite". Does invading advance that objective or make it harder to accomplish?

    More generally, is invading a sensible action--taking all costs and benefits into account--in terms of the English or the Americans putting their own kind ahead of others?

    , @Randal

    When you decide to invade people, the smart thing to do is not to allow them into your country.
     
    The smart thing is not to invade them in the first place, because it's stupid and costly to do so, and not to allow mass immigration because mass immigration is inherently harmful, whether it's muslims or non-muslim foreigners.
  183. @Daniel Chieh
    Europe wants to die. She's successfully implementing her strategy. Stop disturbing her.

    To be more exact, the elite seems to have that as their plan and much of the population appears to largely agree. There's nothing left to say, really. The world wars have killed all of the real men.

    Its really sad.There are tons of effective strategies, but none of them are being implemented. The will is wanting.

    Dan, the theory about the world wars killing off the best stock seems plausible when you look at Germany and Western Europe, but Russia and the East suffered horrendous casualties as well, and there doesn’t seem to be any shortage of high-T alphas in those places. Also, the most cucked nation on the continent is Sweden, and they haven’t lost a single soldier in combat for the last 150 years.

    I’m not saying that the great cullings of the 20th century had no effect, but there’s got to be something else going on there, as well.

    Read More
  184. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Lot
    Am I missing something here?

    Corbyn now up to 19% to be PM on June 30. Current polls show Tories expect to pad on another net 40 seats on top of their current ~100 seat lead over Labour. Polls routinely understate Tory support. In the very unlikely event of no Tory majority, the minor parties hate Corbyn and would coalition only with their own PM or a non-Corbyn from either major party.

    That’s not quite right.
    While the Tories do have 101 more MPs than Labour, their majority in the House of Commons is only 17. A loss of 9 Seats could lose them Government.
    None of the other Parties have repudiated Labour, and all of them have left their options open regarding Corbyn.

    http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lot

    While the Tories do have 101 more MPs than Labour, their majority in the House of Commons is only 17. A loss of 9 Seats could lose them Government.
    None of the other Parties have repudiated Labour, and all of them have left their options open regarding Corbyn.
     
    It is the largest party that gets first crack at forming a government. The Ulster parties are already a few easy votes for the Conservatives.

    However, I think the Tories would support a LibDem PM over letting the LibDems support Corbyn.

    I am not worried and think betting against Corbyn will be an easy $100 (not fun risking $450 to do so however!).

    Tories outperformed 70 out of 70 polls in the month before the 2015 election! In fact out of what looks to be 200 polls, not a single one had them higher than +6, but they won by +6.6. And plenty of polls had Labour ahead.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_United_Kingdom_general_election,_2015#2015

    Britain Elects forecast has about 12 Tory pickups at 90%+ certainty, not a single Labour one even close to that.
  185. There was the Lindt cafe massacre in Sydney which was an Iranian -

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Sydney_hostage_crisis

    The suburb of Sandringham here in Auckland where you have hipster cafes next to halal butchers, the youngsters like the edginess of it. White people are crazy.

    Read More
  186. @Buzz Mohawk
    It's time to stop using one half of Invade/Invite to argue against our right and responsibility to protect ourselves.

    When you decide to invade people, the smart thing to do is not to allow them into your country.

    Every other race on Earth puts its own kind ahead of others, and every other race has invaded others at one time or another. Repeated retorts like "...and the murders we have committed in the Middle East" are getting old.

    They would invade us anyway, if given the chance, as they have done in the past.

    Let’s grant the objective to “not invite”. Does invading advance that objective or make it harder to accomplish?

    More generally, is invading a sensible action–taking all costs and benefits into account–in terms of the English or the Americans putting their own kind ahead of others?

    Read More
  187. @anon
    What the IRA terrorism did suggest, was that it wasn't a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century.
    Like the Muslims later on, they never assimilated and remained hostile to British people and their way of life.

    >>What the IRA terrorism did suggest, was that it wasn’t a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century.

    Problem being, that during the entire 19th and 20th century, and up until this very minute, Northern Ireland was/is as much a part of the UK as Westminster. Northern Irish are UK citizens as much as Enoch Powell was.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    This was, and is, the problem.
    They were allowed to form ghettos in Glasgow, Manchester, and Liverpool, form street gangs to terrorise the non catholic population, while their leaders continuously chastised the indigenous population about sectarian prejudice and bigotry.
    The authorities took the newcomers side at all times, and those 3 cities were turned into violent, corrupt dumps.

    Sound familiar?
    That's because the same thing has been happening in all the the cities of the mainland U.K. with South Asians and Blacks for the last 50+ years
  188. Is that the most famous place in Europe?

    What an autistic concept? Do you see the world in terms of lists and scores? You were an accountant, right?

    Read More
  189. @rw95
    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    There will probably be an incremental increase in the kind of state repression that is called “Security”. Other than that – you are right – nothing will change.

    If we do anything to stop terrorism, the terrorists win.

    Read More
  190. @Daniel H
    >>Walls don’t work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.

    Well, let's just add another 2 feet to the wall, and on and on if necessary.

    Along with Active Denial Systems, National Guard vehicle and aerial patrols, volunteer sheriff’s posses, etc. Prioritize the Great Wall of Trump as a national security issue.

    THE national security issue.

    Read More
  191. @Daniel Chieh
    Well, to be fair, Japan does get doomsday cults of much greater efficiency when they do decide to go and kill people.

    Well, to be fair, Japan does get doomsday cults of much greater efficiency when they do decide to go and kill people.

    The Aum Shinrikyo cult was pretty incompetent. Their total victim count was something like twenty people. One psychotic Korean can out perform that in an afternoon.

    If, however, you are talking about the military junta that governed Japan during WWII, you have a point.

    Read More
  192. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Judah Benjamin Hur
    No question about it. Just consider how much damage one smart terrorist was able to inflict (Bin Laden). I'm worried that something like that (or much worse) will happen again.

    No question about it. Just consider how much damage one smart terrorist was able to inflict (Bin Laden). I’m worried that something like that (or much worse) will happen again.

    hmm… CNN pitched this idea tonight. Namely that the ‘low tech’ British attacks are a sign that the State has rooted out more effective and dangerous terrorist attacks. Leaving only knives and rental vehicles.

    Not to mention the idea that the current attacks are due to ISIS, which isn’t who they — the Brit Muslims — are. So the Brit establishment Muslims are not responsible for the deplorable Muslims. Not to mention that they aren’t immigrants anyway. And the fact they are not more integrated into society is the fault of bigoted whites. Not to mention they need more money to provide services. &c.

    Of course, it is all absurd, but facts have no bearing on any of this. The globalist agenda is immune to evidence.

    Read More
  193. @Opinionator
    It also explains why Eastern European countries have been dealing with immigration better than Western European countries: they finally have their countries back after centuries of being conquered and don’t want to give it up yet again to a foreign power.

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.

    Yes, turning France into Algeria on the Rhone is so good for Jews. Its so good, that France in a few years will be totally “Jundenrein” something that not even Hitler could achieve. Or maybe, just maybe, HBD explains it all. To be blunt, there is something very, very wrong with White people — our women.

    Whites are evolved from an HBD perspective to treat our women well, by being Beta Males. Beta Maledom is innate and a massively sexually selected characteristic. This worked well before the pill, condom, welfare, increased female earnings, and anonymous urban living made White Beta Maledom about as adaptive as the Lindy and 23 Skiddo.

    White women, and ESPECIALLY White Upper Class women, have decided their men are lacking, and no longer needing or wanting Beta Male Provisioning, have decided to replace us with violent, low IQ Third Worlders, especially Africans and Muslims.

    [MORE]

    If you put most White women somewhere on the spectrum between Cackle Pants Hillary and her HATE HATE HATE of you deplorables, and Amanda Palmer, common law wife of Neil Gaiman, acclaimed author with millions of global fans, who wrote a fawning “love poem” to Dhokar Tsarnaev, you would not be far wrong. After all, the nurses at Tsarnaev’s hospital allegedly got into a fight over who would take care of that sexy, wounded bad boy. Women around the Tsarnaev’s knew who they were, and that’s why they were all over them. The older dead one even has an Alpha Widow to go along with his actual widow.

    The rapes, the murder, the slavery, the misery are a feature not a bug of Islam and Muslims and most White women WANT WANT WANT it like an extra dose of a fat-hiding burqua and that sexy male dominance. Women despise male intelligence as much as they prize male violence and dominance. Heck the more Muslims rape and murder in the West the more White women defend them. To anyone who is depressingly familiar with female nature (and nothing is more depressing) then this is absolutely predictable.

    If the story of the West up to the 1950′s was utter dominance based on massing lots of industrious, hard working, willing to die in shock battle or wars of attrition, not to mention cooperative and high trust men, based on the rewards of a woman freely choosing them in exchange for beta male provisioning, the story of Western collapse is that of White women deciding they’ll go all-in for the Bad Boy experience and viewing their men as obsolete.

    TL:DR, the pill and condom make the West obsolete and abolished.

    Thought experiment — if every White dude on the planet resembled a cast member from Sons of Anarchy, how quickly would Muslims in the West be expelled, along with most non-Whites? Two months? Three at most?

    This attack almost certainly puts Corbyn over the top, as most White women WANT to surrender to the most dominant male group which is Muslims, and Corbyn is the candidate of surrender to Islam.

    Bottom line: Harley Quinn, literally a serial killer groupie, is a “feminist hero.” If the West is to survive anywhere it is imperative that almost all White men treat our women as a biker fully patched member would, or worse. Its what they want and the only way to get them to buy in to siding with us instead of the stronger horse.

    Read More
  194. @Steve Sailer
    My nephews found a super cheap trip to Paris right after the Bataclan massacre. But they said Paris was kind of grimy with all the migrants sitting everywhere. You get what you pay for...

    Just imagine how Parisian tourist could have felt yesterday while visiting iconic Trump Tower.

    “Sacrebleu, four thousand miles away, and somehow I feel like I’m stiill at home”:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBRr5SjXcAAFiKt.jpg

    Read More
  195. @Anonymous
    Europe has voted for suicide. The population had its spirit beaten down by vicious anti-White "elites".

    Audio-visual propaganda in the form of MSM entertainment / information is unsurpassed in its ability to sway the masses. Not for nothing is the stranglehold maintained at all costs.

    Read More
  196. @neutral
    I have wondered for some time now if there would be anything that would change peoples minds, by that I mean that this will not lead to the very predictable hashtags, the usual "we must fight them with love and tolerance" and letting in even more immigrants. I hate to say it, but I don't think anything will change peoples minds. They could attack the Economist or the BBC and slaughter the entire senior staff and the people that take over will still say exactly the same. They could launch daily attacks that kill hundreds every day and they will say exactly the same. I even believe that a nuclear attack on some city in Europe would not change their minds.

    The problem is clearly not radical Islam, but radical liberalism.

    Well, we’d look at the bright side, now wouldn’t we. A European city or two being nuked would create more living space for third-world immigrants. Win-win!

    Read More
  197. @whorefinder

    Wait I though the Jews were the ones who got the East Euros to go communist.
     
    They did, and then famously Stalin turned on them and began purging them, leading to death and emigration to Israel. And as communism became unpopular as the decades rolled on, the Semitic drive behind communism led to a backlash in Eastern Europe and Jews became very unwelcome there. Dude, do you even history?

    Retard anti-Semites can never get their stories straight.
     
    Retard Semitic apologists never can logic much.

    Blaming Jews for the fall of the West is like burning your neighbor for hexing you with an illness. It might feel good but won’t do much to fix your illness. Whereas a dose of penicillin might just do the trick, or surgery …

    Eastern Europe had always been a hostile place for Jews, and Western Europe more amenable. Ironically Germany before WWI had been fairly friendly towards Jews, there were many Jews who went to the gas chambers wearing their Iron Crosses thinking that their service for the Kaiser would save them. It did not. By contrast there were few Jews who sought out service in Russia.

    Eastern Europe went Communist because Stalin’s forces rolled over them and conquered them after Hitler had conquered them first (Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia) or had been defeated as Hitler’s allies of convenience (Romania, Hungary). Just as they were conquered by the Ottomans, and then the Austrians and Russians before. In all cases the fundamental issue was military weakness caused by unfavorable geography, lack of military ability, and financial/material weakness. It sucks to be weak and poor and with little help in geography for defense. Places like Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Romania were not exactly known for their friendliness to Communism in the 1930s. Which was imposed by Soviet Occupation after 1945.

    [MORE]

    The fundamental problem is that most Western women want life as a Manson Family groupie*, and Muslims (and Africans) offer that option, in the way that too intelligent, too beta male Western Men do not.

    China has the same problems the West has with Muslim terrorism, there is hardly a month that goes by that does not feature a knife/vehicle attack or a homemade bomb. These things are well known in China in the “undernews” but rarely make it into the West and are heavily censored in China. Eventually some Communist Princeling will make a play for Emperor as the Defender of the Han against Hui (Han Muslims) and Uighur Muslim attacks and either succeed to the Heavenly Throne or provoke the Sitting Emperor to kick out or kill most of China’s Muslims.

    *If women had no control over their fertility, depended on beta male provisioning for survival of themselves and their children, and had severe limits on bad-boy-apolooza, things would be different but that is not going to happen ever since there is zero likelihood of banning such simple technology.

    Rather than super-complicated neo-Copernican ideas of perfect circular orbits of planets with mini orbits within orbits, the most parsimonious explanation of why Eastern Europe is less Muslim afflicted is that their men treat women worse, and thus their women like them better. The treatment and status of women would have I’d bet an R^2 of about .8 in the attitudes and desire for substantial Non-White immavasion. That famous Irish Savant photo of the club in Sweden that only admits White women and African men with no shortage of either group is pretty telling. White women make out fine with mass Third World immigration, White men not so much and that’s the entire point. There is no end to the ways in which White men and Women are the enemy post-pill and condom and either one or the other will be vanquished (or perhaps both).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    That famous Irish Savant photo of the club in Sweden that only admits White women and African men with no shortage of either group is pretty telling. White women make out fine with mass Third World immigration
     
    http://tinyurl.com/y74dr4fp
    That club is in Finland (or was) and the Photo is at Lawrence Auster's site and the Irish Savant's
  198. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Lot

    it wasn’t a good idea to admit hundreds of thousands of Irish Catholics into the UK mainland during the early 20th Century
     
    You assume the alternative would be no immigration. Capital demands cheap labor, so just as likely the Irish who did not come would have been replaced by Africans and South Asians.

    Completely unlikely to import Africans and South Asians in 1900.
    My point is that the Catholic Irish were [and are] a volatile and unassimilable people, and the response of The State of the time was to pander and accomodate them, to the detriment of the local people.
    The only thing that’s changed is the religion and the race of the State’s new pets.

    Read More
  199. @bored identity
    Feel uncomfortable about the series of unfortunate vehicular jihad events?

    Keep Calm and Eat Your Soy!


    Lawrence of Tribalia echo-chambers collective fear about real clear & present danger:


    https://twitter.com/LHSummers/status/870394334373437441

    The global system he refers to is the System Which Must Not Be Named.

    Read More
  200. @Steve Sailer
    My nephews found a super cheap trip to Paris right after the Bataclan massacre. But they said Paris was kind of grimy with all the migrants sitting everywhere. You get what you pay for...

    I’ve been visiting Paris for decades and you could see it beginning back in the mid 1980s. Ten years ago it was out of control (“no-go zones”) in many areas, and by now we’d be at a tipping point even if traitors weren’t in power.

    Read More
  201. The Police shot all three terrorists dead within eight minutes of the attack starting, maybe the Police are learning.

    Read More
  202. @Cool Shoes
    Time to start mocking these Euros for their cowardice.
    After all, wouldn't you start mocking a man who's wife has affair after affair and he doesn't have balls enough to divorce her?
    Same thing.

    wouldn’t you start mocking a man who’s wife has affair after affair and he doesn’t have balls enough to divorce her?

    But what if before, a few years ago when he tried to divorce her and you went to his house and beat him to a pulp and burned his house down and said “if you ever try to divorce her again, I will come back and do it again.” In addition, every day you say he must write on a provided chalkboard an apology for trying to divorce her. Then you start writing books every year about the divorce attempt and make him buy and read them. Then you hire a secrity guard to live in his house to keep an eye on things. If he shows any sings of disrepect to his wife, the guard will make him spend a day in the doghouse to keep him in line. Then you mock him.

    Read More
  203. @Hyperborean
    Isn't it interesting how often when these types of attacks happen the secret police tells us that the perpetrators were known jihadist radicals. If the intelligence services knows that they are dangerous and likely to carry out an attack at some point, even if not in the immediate future, why don't they do anything to prevent it? Is it simply out of "respecting their rights", cowardice or something more sinister?

    Mark Steyn did a good article on the numbers of the most dangerous ‘extremists’ the security services are having to monitor at the moment, and the number of Muslims who similar views but have not been deemed quite as dangerous.. It’s worth a read if you haven’t seen it. Even a few thousand people is more than the security services can properly manage, so there are many Muslims who are not considered a huge, huge threat that just slip through the net in favour of the biggest, most obvious threats. So a lot of these attackers prove to be people who were on the radar but only just.

    Read More
  204. @TheJester
    Absolutely right ... nothing will change. There will be more concerts and other public events to express everyone's solidarity with everyone else. There will be public huggings (rather than hangings). There will be gigabytes of tweets offering condolences to the victims and their families with pleas to remind everyone that not all Muslims are terrorists.

    The above, of course, is useless virtue signaling. It makes people feel better about something they will do nothing about. MI5 got the problem right after Manchester: There are already up to 20,000 suspected terrorists hiding within Britain's Muslim immigrant communities ... and it can only monitor and track 3,000 of them at a time. Given the relatively high Muslim birth rate, this ratio will get worse as years go by. In short, it is too late to doing anything about Islamic terrorism in Britain or anywhere else in Western Europe.

    This should have been foreseen ... but maybe not. This is the new European society populated by radical feminists and gelded "cucks" making concrete progress in establishing a New World Order. As a generalization, the anti-natalist New World Order is led by childless feminists and male homosexuals who for years have been arranging, via mass immigration, the intentional atomization of society with the most diverse social and religious demographic they could organize. A permanent but tolerable level of terrorism on the part of Muslim immigrant communities is now de rigueur across the entire continent.

    It is of course not too late to completely solve the problem, in principle. Special wartime laws that would allow for mass deportation of all citizens who are descended from migrants from Islamic countries.

    Needless to say, that is completely beyond the pale of discourse in Europe or America. Perhaps when these attacks happen with a latency of once a day or more than once a day instead of once every 10-20 days the Overton window can slide a bit.

    Read More
  205. @Wilkey
    At some point if the government doesn't start defending the interests of native Britons and start reducing levels of Muslim immigration the people will start to take matters into their own hands. It may not be happening as soon as you'd think it would, but it's not a matter of if, but when. Rotherham, Lee Rigby, Manchester, London Bridge, the tube bombings...A limit will be reached.
    Read More
  206. @kyle
    The eiffel tower is the most famous place in europe, not st. peters.

    “The eiffel tower is the most famous place in europe, not st. peters”

    That’s probably true, and quite an achievement in a continent with so many important, beautiful and historic buildings. I wonder why it would be the Eiffel Tower, rather than St Paul’s, St Peter’s, the Parthenon?

    It certainly has a shape which means it couldn’t be mistaken for anything else.

    Read More
  207. @Peter Akuleyev
    A few points to discuss:

    1. The UK's recent terrorist attacks are not caused by refugees, but by Muslims born in the UK or who immigrated under normal UK immigration laws.

    2. Almost every terrorist attack in Europe in the last few years has been executed by North Africans. Turks and Pakistani immigrants reduce quality of life in other ways but they don't go in for suicide bombings. Why are North Africans so much more violent and angry than other Muslims?

    3. Always fun to note the number of terrorist attacks in Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic, i.e. zero. On the other hand Austria and Italy have disfunctional immigrant Muslim populations but no significant terrorist attacks yet. But again see point two. We don't have a lot of North Africans in Austria.

    4. Trump's poorly targeted travel ban does nothing to address actual threats to the US. Iranians, if anything, seem like the most desirable Muslim immigrants.

    5. Long term, immigration from Sub Saharan Africa is a far bigger threat to civilization than "Muslim" immigration.

    All very good points. Absent a time machine, there is no short-term solution, and the long-term outlook (for Western Europe at least) is even more depressing.

    Read More
  208. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Perspective
    "It appears that one terrorist strategy is to hit extremely famous spots (such as Westminster Bridge next to Big Ben, or the defeated assault on the Louvre) to disrupt tourism.

    I hear the Eiffel Tower will soon be surrounded by a glass wall.

    I hope St. Peter’s Basilica has extra security. Is that the most famous place in Europe?"

    A similar thought actually occurred to me today as I was reading a travel magazine on holiday deals to Europe before the attack happened. If people visit Europe to experience European culture , that would obviously mean people want to see European people to get a better appreciation and understanding of that culture. Why doesn't the tourist industry start lobbying for sensible immigration and foreign security policies that would preserve European demographic hegemony? Of course European countries still have mostly 80-85 percent plus majorities, but in Paris I hear even the central city is experiencing Islamification and Africanization.

    My wife likes to travel in Europe and I am an indulgent husband, so we go to parts or Europe not yet transformed. We did a final trip to see the Louvre about 5 years ago, and now if we go to France it is to resorts and restaurants in the countryside. As for urban travels we will stick to Hungary, Slovakia, etc.

    Read More
  209. @Yan Shen
    Here's the question that I'm posing to the liberals on Slate mindlessly parroting standard liberal talking points that they've been fed most of their lives.

    "There have been 3 terrorist attacks in the UK in the past 2 months alone. How far back would we have to go in a country like South Korea or Japan to find 3 such terrorist attacks?"

    Japan — Early 1930′s. Political assassinations by Black Dragon Society.

    Read More
  210. @gcochran
    "They could attack the Economist or the BBC and slaughter the entire senior staff and the people that take over will still say exactly the same."

    It's worth a try.

    It certainly is a head-scratcher why elitist Establishment institutions like those are never hit…

    The Bank of England and various pop celebrities’ homes seem curiously immune, as well.

    Read More
  211. @streamfortyseven
    Pack them up, ship them out, and demolish their mosques. Until they are removed, the terror will continue. They're not fit to live in civilized society.

    “The suitcase or the coffin.”

    Read More
  212. @Cortes
    I wonder when someone in the public eye is going to compare the snowflake response from the Metropolitan Police of London (Run! Hide! Tell!) to the way things were done back in the day in both Scotland and England/Wales...

    Compulsory weapons practice so ordinary people could deal confidently with potential threats to the common weal.

    Read More
  213. @Opinionator
    ...and the murders we have committed in the Middle East.

    You are a dumb, self blaming, self hater. Hater of his own people too. Pffftttt….. I never insult other posters but you are an ill educated blight. Troll, you are joining Corvinus in the Unz kill file.

    Read More
  214. @Cool Shoes
    Time to start mocking these Euros for their cowardice.
    After all, wouldn't you start mocking a man who's wife has affair after affair and he doesn't have balls enough to divorce her?
    Same thing.
    Read More
  215. @Anonymous
    The mosques are barracks.

    Universalist white westerners just don't get it. They relentless project their worldview onto the scorpion.

    That is an excellent line, sir. I hope you don’t mind if I appropriate it.

    Read More
  216. @anon
    WHAT? The first news website I visit in my daily routine is unz. Is there another terrorist attack in London?

    My thoughts exactly.

    Actually I was planning on reading more on Oliver Stone’s interview with Putin later in the day, but for now I … must … fight … ants in the house.

    (My name is not Leiningen)

    Read More
  217. Thoughts and prayers here , to Allah of course , wouldn’t want to offend anyone . I wonder if there is a service where for a small monthly fee one could have a small stuffed animal or candle or some plastic flowers delivered to the site of the latest Muzzie Mayhem ?

    Read More
  218. @Anon
    In a month starts the tour de france. It's actually the perfect target for terrorists. Watched live by millions ans no real distance to the riders.
    I think it's just a matter of time before someone blows up live on tv.

    Boston Marathon bombing came close. Similar event.

    Read More
  219. @bored identity
    Feel uncomfortable about the series of unfortunate vehicular jihad events?

    Keep Calm and Eat Your Soy!


    Lawrence of Tribalia echo-chambers collective fear about real clear & present danger:


    https://twitter.com/LHSummers/status/870394334373437441

    Clear and present danger to an orderly global system is the entire reason people voted for Trump.

    Read More
  220. @rw95
    So who wants to bet absolutely nothing is going to change because of this?

    this is just another incident in a long series of incidents which most likely has not ended yet. So why should anything change?

    Read More
  221. @anonymous
    Walls don't work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.

    Walls don’t work.

    And his holiness Pope Francis believes in building bridges, not walls.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buck Turgidson
    With the exception of some of the biggest walls I ever have seen around Vatican City
  222. @Peter Akuleyev
    A few points to discuss:

    1. The UK's recent terrorist attacks are not caused by refugees, but by Muslims born in the UK or who immigrated under normal UK immigration laws.

    2. Almost every terrorist attack in Europe in the last few years has been executed by North Africans. Turks and Pakistani immigrants reduce quality of life in other ways but they don't go in for suicide bombings. Why are North Africans so much more violent and angry than other Muslims?

    3. Always fun to note the number of terrorist attacks in Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic, i.e. zero. On the other hand Austria and Italy have disfunctional immigrant Muslim populations but no significant terrorist attacks yet. But again see point two. We don't have a lot of North Africans in Austria.

    4. Trump's poorly targeted travel ban does nothing to address actual threats to the US. Iranians, if anything, seem like the most desirable Muslim immigrants.

    5. Long term, immigration from Sub Saharan Africa is a far bigger threat to civilization than "Muslim" immigration.

    very good points, especially the last one. Although taking the global perspective North Africans are by far not the only problem. Look at China, India, South East Asia, Pakistan, East Africa, West Africa. Though Shiites really are a much smaller problem than Sunnis. Iranian immigrants are good, especially those who left Iran because of the the Islamic Revolution.

    Read More
  223. @anonymous
    Walls don't work. If you build a 25 foot wall someone comes up with a 26 foot ladder.

    That’s why you put electric wire on the top.

    Read More
  224. @PiltdownMan

    For most of its history, it’s basically been 3/4 Chinese and 1/4 non-Chinese.
     
    This is actually incorrect. Singapore was majority Indian until 1948, at least, with Malays and Chinese making up the rest. The Lee Kuan Yew government strongly favored the immigration of Mainland Chinese, without making any public waves about it. The communist takeover of China and subsequent waves of refugees helped change the balance of ethnicities in Singapore. In Singapore itself, history has been retconned to downplay and pigeonhole the role of Indians in its history, to the extent of completely avoiding any mention in their war museums of the presence of significant numbers of the British Indian Army during the fall of Singapore in WWII. This is not surprising if you consider that Singapore was administered out of Calcutta until about 100 years ago, by the British.

    Lee Kuan Yew's views on the strengths and weaknesses of the various ethnicities in Singapore were explicit. He thought Indians made for good accountants and CFOs, but were not CEO material. When an Indian was appointed the CEO of Singapore biggest bank a few years ago, there was openly published debate in the newspapers about Indian managers not having the magic ingredient.

    In Singapore itself, history has been retconned to downplay and pigeonhole the role of Indians in its history, to the extent of completely avoiding any mention in their war museums of the presence of significant numbers of the British Indian Army during the fall of Singapore in WWII.

    I didn’t know the demographics of Singapore changed so much recently, so thanks for the info. As for Indian participation in WWII, we should keep in mind that the Japanese, while being very hostile to the Chinese, advertised themselves as well-wishers of Indians (whether or not they were sincere is a different question.) They wanted the Indians on their side, at least for a while, to stir up trouble in India against British rule, and possibly even help the Japanese “liberate” India (and then fall into the Japanese lap, I guess.) The Japanese let the Indian nationalist leader, Subhash Chanbdra Bose land in Singapore and recruit an army from among the Indian POWs. Given that many of these POWs had seen their British officers surrender pusillanimously to the Japanese, they were completely disillusioned about the superiority of the British, and many of them enthusiastically flocked to Bose’s Indian National Army (which helped the Japanese invade eastern India, but eventually lost and was disbanded.)

    I wonder if these events increased antagonism the local Chinese (including LKY) felt for the local Indians, because the former were most definitely oppressed by the Japanese. Do you have any info on this?

    Read More
  225. @PiltdownMan

    For most of its history, it’s basically been 3/4 Chinese and 1/4 non-Chinese.
     
    This is actually incorrect. Singapore was majority Indian until 1948, at least, with Malays and Chinese making up the rest. The Lee Kuan Yew government strongly favored the immigration of Mainland Chinese, without making any public waves about it. The communist takeover of China and subsequent waves of refugees helped change the balance of ethnicities in Singapore. In Singapore itself, history has been retconned to downplay and pigeonhole the role of Indians in its history, to the extent of completely avoiding any mention in their war museums of the presence of significant numbers of the British Indian Army during the fall of Singapore in WWII. This is not surprising if you consider that Singapore was administered out of Calcutta until about 100 years ago, by the British.

    Lee Kuan Yew's views on the strengths and weaknesses of the various ethnicities in Singapore were explicit. He thought Indians made for good accountants and CFOs, but were not CEO material. When an Indian was appointed the CEO of Singapore biggest bank a few years ago, there was openly published debate in the newspapers about Indian managers not having the magic ingredient.

    Lee Kuan Yew’s views on the strengths and weaknesses of the various ethnicities in Singapore were explicit. He thought Indians made for good accountants and CFOs, but were not CEO material.

    Do you have any citations for this? If LKY thought so, presumably he thought Chinese made better CEOs than Indians? The stereotype seems to have been reversed in the US though; many Fortune 500 companies have Indian CEOs, many more so than East Asians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Any casual reading of his history displays it. He was explicitly racist, even against other Chinese. It was only the consummate failure of the British against the Japanese that made him decide that white men should not lead everything; he remained convinced that whites were generally more likely to be successful to the end of his life if they did not self-destruct - and he saw multiculturalism to be a weakness, or at best, a dangerous potential to be carefully managed.

    By his opinion, it did seem like whites self-destructed.
  226. @Greasy William
    When you guys bash Islam you are basically saying that mass immigration is fine as long as it is of non Muslims.

    We are going to get mass immigration anyway so it is better that it be Islamic because Muslims alienate the public so much more. Also Muslims are much more of a threat to Globalism than any of us will ever be.

    You’re that crazy Jew who fancies himself a political analyst, aren’t you. Go hit on Louise Mensch, you’d make a perfect couple.

    Read More
  227. @Daniel Chieh
    Well, to be fair, Japan does get doomsday cults of much greater efficiency when they do decide to go and kill people.

    The 1995 Tokyo subway sarin attack was the deadliest incident to occur in Japan since the end of World War II. The five coordinated attacks killed 12 people and injured 50. (Because it evaporates so quickly, sarin presents an immediate but short-lived threat.)

    There were also a few other attacks and murders by Aum Shinrikyo, but all in all I’d hardly call that “much greater efficiency”…
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aum_Shinrikyo#Incidents_before_1995

    Worst terrorist strikes–worldwide, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston:
    http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255i.html

    Unless you’re referencing the crimes of imperial Japan?… Those are indeed in the same league as some of humanity’s worst.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimes#List_of_major_crimes

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Ah, my apologies. I thought the Aum Shinrikyo attacks were a lot deadlier.
  228. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @e
    One witness described the men as "of Mediterranean or Asian colouring."

    Yeah, right, Asian. Anything to avoid saying "Middle Eastern."

    In the UK, Asian is what they call sub-continentals.

    Read More
  229. @anon
    Only if you bet me that leftists and the media will say this has nothing to do with islam.

    Care for a bit o sharia wif your fish n chips , mate ?

    If we don't allow in millions of "asians" and "mediteranians " , how the hell are we going to get kebabs and asian takeaway ? I mean the recipes are secret , difficult to recreate and totally unavailable on the internet.

    Not to mention the cultural appropriation if whites tried to cook Asian food. It’s just not acceptable!

    Read More
  230. @Lot

    Jewish influence is stronger in the West than in Eastern Europe.
     
    Wait I though the Jews were the ones who got the East Euros to go communist. Retard anti-Semites can never get their stories straight.

    The Jewish demographic in Eastern Europe has diminished a great deal since about 1940.

    There will probably be quite a large section in your local library dealing with this if you are interested.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    The fiction section, right?
    , @peterike

    The Jewish demographic in Eastern Europe has diminished a great deal since about 1940.

     

    Well in Ukraine at least, they are a tiny, tiny minority, yet a large majority of the oligarchs who own the whole damn country. Is it like that elsewhere?
  231. @whorefinder
    Putting their faith in a woman (La Pen) was a bad idea. The French were probably thinking of St. Joan of Arc, but she wasn't some middle aged, supremely-organized, long-in-wait French political actor and scion of the French Right, but a mystic visionary country girl who went by her lonesome and personally rallied the beleaguered troops to stunning victories because, quite frankly, the regular French establishment had failed them and was all but giving up to become a rump state and vassal of the English.

    The French, like the Brits, need to be led by men. Brave native French and British white men of traditional stock, non-gay, and of the traditional national religion. You'll note that Viktor Orban and Vladimir Putin and Bibi Netanyahu fit these bills, and their countries are achieving success. Trump is doing so here in America. Enough of this Theresa May-Marine Le Pen soft-feminism nonsense.

    If La Pen really wants her movement to succeed, she'll find a bold white Gallic straight Catholic French man and put him in charge. Enough of this female nonsense. If France needs a great female leader God will send her, just as he did St. Joan of Arc. Until then, He orders men to lead.

    True, but in Western Europe the barriers to such “brave native white men of traditional stock, non-gay, and of the traditional national religion” seem high.

    It’s no coincidence that strong right-wing or populist stances are often defended by Jewish intellectuals, or gays, or women (off the top of my head Zemmour, Finkielkraut, Pim Fortuyn, Florian Philippot, Frauke Petry, Margaret Thatcher (?). You can’t easily call such people Nazis, so they can express ideas that would not otherwise be allowed to be aired.

    The US (and the UK?) don’t have quite as strict a prohibition, since they were never fascist.

    (by the way “La Pen” is a handy shorthand which I hadn’t run across, nice! But what would we call Marion… Le Pen, La Pen, … Bébé Pen? Lait Pen?)

    Read More
  232. @Random Dude on the Internet
    Europeans today are living in a post-colonial world. Many of these countries, especially the UK and France, used to have impressive empires that spanned the globe that are now totally gone, with the exception of a couple islands here and there. To live in a society where they're past their peak, it probably doesn't seem like it is worth saving. The best days of their country are long since gone. It also explains why Eastern European countries have been dealing with immigration better than Western European countries: they finally have their countries back after centuries of being conquered and don't want to give it up yet again to a foreign power.

    America is a little different because we're still in Pax Americana so people are a little more aware of what is at stake, which is why Trump got elected.

    But America will catch up with Europe’s Muslim numbers if someone doesn’t stop them from coming.

    Trump can’t even get a temporary from a handful of Muslims countries past the judges.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lot

    Trump can’t even get a temporary from a handful of Muslims countries past the judges.
     
    I think we're going to have a big win at the Supreme Court and see the executive orders reinstated. Could be as soon as three months from now.
  233. @anon
    Lets assume you are right. Just for argument's sake. They still couldn't kill British people in Britain if they couldn't get INSIDE into Britain. So it really is the open immigration policies as the cause.

    Mass immigration makes it easy for our acts of aggression to trigger acts of retaliatory violence here, because there are significant pools of people in place here who sympathise with the victims of our military aggression, ready to act. But it isn’t true that no mass immigration means no retaliation.

    In the C19th and before, European nations could happily slaughter Africans and Asians completely safe from retaliation in our own countries, because the means for such retaliation simply were not available to the victims. As technological advance and the spread of the industrial revolution and its consequences has shrunk the world, making travel easier and multiplying the killing force available to individuals and small groups, this has become ever less true. In the mid-C20th, the resistance to the imposition of Israel on the ME led to plenty of terrorism by mostly secularist, socialist and nationalist groups, without much need for mass immigration to western states. The world has become a lot smaller since then.

    Ending mass immigration should be done because mass migration is inherently harmful, not out of fear of terrorism. It will also reduce the amount of terrorism our policies generate. But it won’t end it, that’s for sure. Maybe nothing will, completely. But the correct policies nevertheless are:

    Controlled borders and limited migration
    No more interventionist wars of aggression and regime change interference
    Strong military, used only for genuine defence, not “preventive” aggression dressed up as defence

    Read More
  234. @Wilkey
    At some point if the government doesn't start defending the interests of native Britons and start reducing levels of Muslim immigration the people will start to take matters into their own hands. It may not be happening as soon as you'd think it would, but it's not a matter of if, but when. Rotherham, Lee Rigby, Manchester, London Bridge, the tube bombings...A limit will be reached.

    A limit will be reached.

    Not necessarily. As long the police cooperate with the govt, nothing changes.

    Locking people up for insulting Muslims shows that the police are happy with things as they are.

    Read More
  235. @22pp22
    I am a POM Kiwi, born in the UK. This is the new normal. I don't care any more. Londoners elected a mayor with fundamentalist sympathies and felt oh-so-smug about doing so. The smugness was so extreme you could almost sense it in the atmosphere.

    Pimp my daughter
    Mug my mother
    I still love you
    You're my brother

    hashtag- thoughts and prayers, light and candle blah-dee-blah

    rinse and repeat.

    I am in Cyprus at the moment. Most of the POMs I meet here are well aware of what a disaster this has been, but it's too late.

    Kiwis often suffer from exactly the same mindless smugness that brought about this catastrophe in England.

    Kiwi living in London here. NZers are the smuggest most pompous people of the Anglosphere. We are truly convinced, in a religious sense, that there is something different in the dirt in NZ that confers moral excellency upon us, and anyone else who deigns to land there. One day, there will be terror act there and the sense of stupefaction will be off the charts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @22pp22
    There has already been a hijacking by a Somali woman who was given residency after spitting in her immigration officer's face. It has been decided that she should not be deported after her release from jail.
  236. @whorefinder
    Putting their faith in a woman (La Pen) was a bad idea. The French were probably thinking of St. Joan of Arc, but she wasn't some middle aged, supremely-organized, long-in-wait French political actor and scion of the French Right, but a mystic visionary country girl who went by her lonesome and personally rallied the beleaguered troops to stunning victories because, quite frankly, the regular French establishment had failed them and was all but giving up to become a rump state and vassal of the English.

    The French, like the Brits, need to be led by men. Brave native French and British white men of traditional stock, non-gay, and of the traditional national religion. You'll note that Viktor Orban and Vladimir Putin and Bibi Netanyahu fit these bills, and their countries are achieving success. Trump is doing so here in America. Enough of this Theresa May-Marine Le Pen soft-feminism nonsense.

    If La Pen really wants her movement to succeed, she'll find a bold white Gallic straight Catholic French man and put him in charge. Enough of this female nonsense. If France needs a great female leader God will send her, just as he did St. Joan of Arc. Until then, He orders men to lead.

    Geert Wilders in the Netherlands has had even less success than Le Pen.

    I don’t think it have mattered a bit if there had been a male Le Pen.

    Macron has what can only be described as an “unusual” marriage but that didn’t slow him down.

    Nope, it’s policy alone people are voting on.

    Read More
  237. @whorefinder
    Putting their faith in a woman (La Pen) was a bad idea. The French were probably thinking of St. Joan of Arc, but she wasn't some middle aged, supremely-organized, long-in-wait French political actor and scion of the French Right, but a mystic visionary country girl who went by her lonesome and personally rallied the beleaguered troops to stunning victories because, quite frankly, the regular French establishment had failed them and was all but giving up to become a rump state and vassal of the English.

    The French, like the Brits, need to be led by men. Brave native French and British white men of traditional stock, non-gay, and of the traditional national religion. You'll note that Viktor Orban and Vladimir Putin and Bibi Netanyahu fit these bills, and their countries are achieving success. Trump is doing so here in America. Enough of this Theresa May-Marine Le Pen soft-feminism nonsense.

    If La Pen really wants her movement to succeed, she'll find a bold white Gallic straight Catholic French man and put him in charge. Enough of this female nonsense. If France needs a great female leader God will send her, just as he did St. Joan of Arc. Until then, He orders men to lead.

    Perhaps. Or perhaps Simone of Calais (“The Death of Civilization”) should be their candidate.

    Read More
  238. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anonymous
    Europe has voted for suicide. The population had its spirit beaten down by vicious anti-White "elites".

    Europe has voted for suicide.

    No they didn’t.

    They are being manipulated into what is effectively a stealth genocide by a corrupted political-media class.

    If it was suicide the media and politicians wouldn’t have to lie about and cover up the negative consequences of mass immigration.

    Read More
  239. @Random Dude on the Internet
    The alt right oddly enough also seems to be backing Corbyn over May. Partly because of accelerationism and partly because it seems like UKIP has totally deflated since Farage stepping down the first time. It is shocking how incompetent May has been as a PM, not because I figured she would do better, it's more that she's just that incompetent that it continues to surprise.

    The alt right oddly enough also seems to be backing Corbyn over May. Partly because of accelerationism and partly because it seems like UKIP has totally deflated since Farage stepping down the first time.

    UKIP understandably has not yet reorganised itself to deal with the consequences of achieving its core goal with the victory in the Brexit referendum.

    As for supporting Corbyn over May that might be going a bit far, but with May allowing the advance of “hate speech” censorship and harassment of patriots and traditionalists, and enthusiastically continuing the invade the world globalist policies and, perhaps less enthusiastically, the related invite the world policies, it’s hard to get up much enthusiasm for voting “Conservative”. It’s more a case, I think, of voting tactically for the more reliably pro-Brexit candidate in each constituency regardless of party.

    And, of course, as someone who has been openly menaced with the threat of legal harassment by someone supposedly representing jewish interests, this kind of stuff makes me feel that even a Labour victory would at least have some redeeming features:

    If Jeremy Corbyn and his followers do not suffer a gigantic defeat in this election, it will be an utter, complete, ghastly disaster for Jews. It will mean that despite all that has happened in the past two years, all his supporters have said about Jews, people — even Jews, for goodness sake — can still support him. … Jeremy Corbyn mustn’t just lose. He must be crushed electorally. It must be impossible for his supporters to say that it wasn’t too bad and they should have another go. …

    Read More
  240. @Buzz Mohawk
    It's time to stop using one half of Invade/Invite to argue against our right and responsibility to protect ourselves.

    When you decide to invade people, the smart thing to do is not to allow them into your country.

    Every other race on Earth puts its own kind ahead of others, and every other race has invaded others at one time or another. Repeated retorts like "...and the murders we have committed in the Middle East" are getting old.

    They would invade us anyway, if given the chance, as they have done in the past.

    When you decide to invade people, the smart thing to do is not to allow them into your country.

    The smart thing is not to invade them in the first place, because it’s stupid and costly to do so, and not to allow mass immigration because mass immigration is inherently harmful, whether it’s muslims or non-muslim foreigners.

    Read More