The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Katz: "It's Time to Take the 'Great' White Men of Science Off Their Pedestals"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From The Guardian:

It’s time to take the ‘great’ white men of science off their pedestals
Yarden Katz

Tuesday 19 September 2017

… As this latest controversy shows, science also has its monuments to white supremacy. Like Confederate monuments, these statues should be removed. They are daggers to the open wounds of communities that have long known that white supremacy reaches far beyond the sphere of conventional politics into medicine and science. But removing these monuments won’t be sufficient on its own. …

There are also institutional monuments within science to be revisited. Britain’s prestigious biomedical research institute, the Crick, is named after Francis Crick, famous for his Nobel-prizewinning work on the double helix structure of DNA with James Watson. Both were proponents of eugenics. In the early 1970s, Crick defended other prominent racist scientists who proposed a plan where individuals deemed unfit would be paid to undergo sterilisation. Crick wrote in one letter that “more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”, which “will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment”. He urged that steps be taken to avoid the “serious” consequences. Crick also proposed that “irresponsible people” be sterilised “by bribery”. In the brochure of the institute bearing his name, Crick is nonetheless presented as a scientific hero known for his “intelligence and openness to new ideas”.

Indeed, Sir Francis Crick’s parents named him after the archdemon Sir Francis Galton. So what more do you need to know about Crick’s innate, hereditary evilness?

… A controversial memo recently circulated by a Google engineer, for example, based its claim that women are less capable than men in certain jobs on evolutionary psychology – a claim that, as physicist Chanda Prescod-Weinstein subsequently wrote, gains legitimacy from the unfortunate fact that “it’s 2017, and to some extent scientific literature still supports a patriarchal view that ranks a man’s intellect above a woman’s”. There’s no shortage of examples of scientists who have found ways to see sexist or racist ideas as “universals” of nature.

Nonetheless, there has been a persistent effort to manufacture a public image of science as being above the fray of politics – especially since the election of Donald Trump.

Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?

 
Hide 244 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Every. Single. Time.

    Read More
    • Agree: AndrewR
    • Replies: @DriesNK
    Mask slipped off again.
    , @The preferred nomenclature is...
    I know right.

    It's almost like they want to be hated and despised.
    , @bored identity
    'What.Does.It.Even.Mean?'



    bored identity's just kiddin'.

    Actually, he is still LOL, while Waiting for Silver's 538 & Godot to run some Serious Hate Fact Algos on Every.Single.Time.

    Good luck with that, right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /isteve/katz-its-time-to-take-the-great-white-men-of-science-off-their-pedestals/#comment-2012879
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    The guardian article is just more evidence that multi-religious, multi-ethnic, multiracial society means STRIFE.

    Eternal strife.

    Endless “counting coup” is the future as the braves of warrior tribes do their thing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dahlia
    For real. Isn't this the greatest argument *against* multiculturalism?

    I've pointed out before the drive for reconciliation, often forgotten because of reconstruction, that drove the North to honor some of the heroes of the South as a way to heal wounds, bring their brothers back into the fold, and I've wondered recently if such a thing is possible in the future.

    I've got to believe that it is, that the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death is an artifact of our extreme cocooning-meets-huge-wealth-chasm era. But other times, I wonder if it's a pipe dream.
    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?
    , @namae nanka

    "Now the Suffragettes cannot raise civil war in this soldierly and decisive sense; first, because they are women; and, secondly, because they are very few women. But they can raise something else; which is altogether another pair of shoes.

    "They do not create revolution; what they do create is anarchy; and the difference between these is not a question of violence, but a question of fruitfulness and finality.

    "Revolution of its nature produces government; anarchy only produces more anarchy. (...) You can only knock off the King's head once. But you can knock off the King's hat any number of times. Destruction is finite, obstruction is infinite: so long as rebellion takes the form of mere disorder (instead of an attempt to enforce a new order) there is no logical end to it; it can feed on itself and renew itself forever.
     
    http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2011/06/revolution-or-permanent-anarchy-gk.html?m=1
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. The WASP / Jew ruling class is evil and it must be obliterated. Katz should be encouraged to relocate to a non-European nation — Uganda would be perfect. Katz is a Harvard Jew who perfectly exemplifies the anti-White atmosphere that pervades the Ivy League.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous-antimarxist
    Yarden Katz is not just any Jewish Harvard Professor.

    https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/ykatz

    Yarden Katz is a departmental fellow in Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School. His scientific interests are at the interface of artificial intelligence and biology. At Berkman Klein, he is working on understanding the politics and culture of biomedical science. He is particularly interested in how scientific projects are influenced by fields thought to be external to science, like journalism and economics. What questions are prioritized, and which directions get sidelined, by seemingly “non-scientific” considerations? How do these external factors affect the building of a “commons” in biomedical science - and what can biomedical science learn from the software world about commons-building? He will focus on how privatization and the machinery of "intellectual property" law change the practice of academic biomedical research.
     
    Remember James Damore was working on his PH.D in Systems Biology at Harvard when he left for Google.

    Maybe knowing that Katz would be inspecting his thesis for anything politically incorrect was why Damore left Harvard for an elite programmer job Google in the first place?

    Oh well out of the frying pan and into the fire.

    No Place for White Men!!!
    , @David Davenport
    The WASP / Jew ruling class is evil and it must be obliterated.

    Charles old buddy, "Pewitt" is a WASP name.

    "Charles Pewitt" is obviously not your real name.

    I'm guessing that you're a Beijing boot licker.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. syonredux says:

    HG Wells has gotta go:

    While Nature’s editorial purported to object to “whitewashing” the past, the magazine has done plenty of whitewashing itself. A profile of novelist HG Wells last year described him as a “science-populariser” driven by a “desire to use writing to make the world better”, often by projecting “utopian” visions. It left out Wells’s enthusiasm for eugenics.

    Wells gave a glimpse into his flavour of utopia when he wrote in 1901 that “those swarms of black, and brown, and dirty-white, and yellow people” that fail to be “efficient” would have “to die out and disappear”. He also produced long screeds on Jews. According to Nature, though, Wells embodied the essence of “the scientific method”, which “conferred on its user the authority to rethink and challenge stale ideas”. When a £50,000 bronze statue of Wells was unveiled last year in Woking, Surrey, an official said the statue was meant to “inspire future generations of young people to continue in Wells’s legacy”.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/19/white-supremacist-statues-must-fall-scientists

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    The statue erected to honour the man who wanted to smash everything than came before is itself smashed by his ideological children. Delicious.
    , @David
    HG Wells published The Outline of History four or five years after Birth of a Nation was made. Discussing slavery in the United States he says...

    The Massachusetts constitution of 1780 had declared that “all men are born free and equal.” A certain negro, Quaco, put this to the test in 1783, and in that year the soil of Massachusetts became like the soil of Britain, intolerant of slavery; to tread upon it was to become free.
     

    There was in Virginia a strong party in favour of emancipating slaves. But they demanded that the emancipated slaves should leave the state within a year or be outlawed! They were naturally alarmed at the possibility that a free barbaric black community, many of its members African-born and reeking with traditions of cannibalism and secret and dreadful religious rites, should arise beside them upon Virginian soil. When we consider that point of view, we can understand why it was that a large number of Virginians should be disposed to retain the mass of blacks in the country under control as slaves, while at the same time they were bitterly opposed to the slave trade and the importation of any fresh blood from Africa. The free blacks, one sees, might easily become a nuisance; indeed the free state of Massachusetts presently closed its borders to their entry....
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. I am not sure that the Guardian will advance the Mainstream Narrative by reproducing thoughtful old quotes as in this article:

    Crick wrote in one letter that “more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”, which “will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment”.

    That evaluation/prediction has certainly stood the test of time! Mainstream scientific understanding of human biodiversity has retreated, rather than advanced, since Crick wrote that. Was that in the 1950s?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Unladen Swallow
    IIRC, Crick wrote that around 1969.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Tyrion says:

    Steve, the guy is a loser.

    He is certainly no pro-Jewish advocate. He is no hypocrite as you imply. Just an all round idiot.

    Here is another quote of his:

    “If we only dare look (at Israel), we see that there’s apartheid and much more.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Altai
    He is intellectually honest then, but his angst against the 'great white men' is not introspective either. Critical theory is still critical theory and still seeks to tear down or undermine any sense of cohesive identity in Western nations because it makes some people feel unsafe.
    , @Anon
    He's getting high on his own supply.
    , @Former Liberal
    Time to take JEWS off their pedestals as being perpetually oppressed, " chosen”, and oh so much better than everyone else!
    , @ogunsiron
    So ? He's one of those jews who hate israel because it doesn't live up to his idea of the jewish ideal. he's the kind of jew who hates Israel because in israel they do goyisch stuff like having an army, being patriots, promoting large families etc. He's one of those jews who thinks that it's supremely jewish to hate israel, because israel is too damn goyish.
    , @Opinionator
    Is he anti-Zionist or does he merely oppose some of Israel's "policies," such as its invasion and colonization of the West Bank?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. And as everybody knows, all evil in all of history was committed only by Whites.

    Orientals, Africans, Middle Easterners – their histories are pure sweetness and light.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    Sarah, and of course the violence committed by non-whites is the result of their interaction with whites. All Amerindians were peace loving and kind until the Europeans landed here.
    , @Dieter Kief

    Orientals, Africans, Middle Easterners – their histories are pure sweetness and light.
     
    I agree - and that's why everything is so easy, worldwide, btw.
    , @anonymous
    LOL! Of course not!

    But the most evil has been committed by the Albino Man.

    Those evil "coloured" tyrants who also commit much evil (living example, India's Modi), are simply masking their inferiority complex by emulating their idols... the Albino Man.

    As for the Jihadist evil of killing innocents, they are simply taking revenge... an eye for a million eyes, and all. It is difficult to blame them much.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Hello fellow White people…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Felix...
    Should have included the gif
    , @Anon
    ugh...someone please explain this one to me...
    , @biz
    Irony alert though: Yarden Katz's primary gig is writing for Mondoweiss, a tedious anti-Israel website which is on Steve's and Unz's blogroll.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Don’t be bitter just because your ancestors were wasting their average 115 IQs swindling Polish peasants, while the Anglo-Saxons were using their average 100 IQs to create science, the industrial revolution, representative government, end slavery, explore the globe etc.

    Read More
    • Agree: Realist, jim jones
    • Replies: @3g4me
    @#9 John Gruskos: "Don’t be bitter just because your ancestors were wasting their average 115 IQs swindling Polish peasants, while the Anglo-Saxons were using their average 100 IQs to create science, the industrial revolution, representative government, end slavery, explore the globe etc."

    Top top top kek.
    , @Anon
    The 100 average is of Americans as a whole.
    Anglo-Americans score higher.
    , @Frankie P
    Dude,

    All wrong! They weren't wasting their 115 IQs swindling Polish peasants; they were wasting the 115 IQs head banging to the Talmudic study rap, under the tyranny of the rabbis. They were wasting their 115 IQs on pilpul, trying to square the circle of the endless contradictions they found in the different readings and interpretations of their holy text. The "Jewish Renaissance" never would have happened without the fertile intellectual ground that Christian Western Europe provided; they would still be in Poland, nodding and arguing about what exactly that rabbi meant when he wrote...

    Frankie P
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    ‘Take the “great white men of science” off their pedestals’.

    Yep. I like it.

    The word ‘pedestal’ usually refers to the raised base of a statue. Now, these bases are usually made of stone, typically an iron-hard stone such as granite. As we all know, granite is an absolute b*stard to work. It has to be wrought with tools of iron and steel, formerly by the sheer hard graft of a (white) man’s muscles, now it’s done by (white man developed) pneumatic tool. The iron and steel for those tools was smelted, forged and tempered by whom exactly?
    No doubt that lump of granite had to be transported a long distance from the quarry where a gang of (whom?) wrested it from the unforgiving earth. No doubt cranes and trucks (developed by whom?) performed the otherwise heroic feat of dragging it from quarry to public square.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. Its the current year d00ds.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. “In the early 1970s, Crick defended other prominent racist scientists who proposed a plan where individuals deemed unfit would be paid to undergo sterilisation.”

    This is a quite sensible proposal. The individuals would be paid, not forced to undergo sterilization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thirdeye
    Norplant for welfare. It would be reversible sterilization and an incentive to get her act together if she wants children.

    Irresponsible reproduction has social consequences at least as bad as irresponsible driving. Driving is a licensed, revocable privilege.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Altai says:

    Yarden Katz. Yarden, really? Can they not even scare up a John Smith to write these things? At least get somebody whose given name isn’t a modern Hebrew one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @A guy
    It's not modern Hebrew , but ancient. Yarden is Jordan , as in the River.
    , @ogunsiron
    How old is this guy ? He's of a generation when ((( they ))) felt they didn't need to hide behind names like Harvey, Sheldon, etc. He seems a Max Blumenthal type. The kind of jew whose dedication to the abolition of nations is total.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Altai says:
    @Tyrion
    Steve, the guy is a loser.

    He is certainly no pro-Jewish advocate. He is no hypocrite as you imply. Just an all round idiot.

    Here is another quote of his:

    "If we only dare look (at Israel), we see that there’s apartheid and much more."

    He is intellectually honest then, but his angst against the ‘great white men’ is not introspective either. Critical theory is still critical theory and still seeks to tear down or undermine any sense of cohesive identity in Western nations because it makes some people feel unsafe.

    Read More
    • Agree: Opinionator
    • Replies: @Tyrion

    Critical theory is still critical theory and still seeks to tear down or undermine any sense of cohesive identity in Western nations because it makes some people feel unsafe.
     
    One of those Western nations is Israel.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. “more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”, which “will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment”.

    That seems about right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TG
    Reply to europeasant. Indeed. But you know, I bet that more than half the difference between the average IQ of stupid white Americans and smart white Americans is also due to genetic reasons? But so what. A healthy society needs truck drivers and plumbers as much as (if not more than) theoretical physicists and brain surgeons. In a tight labor market, all labor - skilled and unskilled alike - can do pretty good. That perhaps some races are, ON AVERAGE, possibly less smart than others, only matters if we adhere to rigid numerical racial quotas for high-skill professions. As far as the society as a whole, so what? I mean, there's lots of stupid people in Japan. But with a tight labor market, Japanese truck drivers and janitors do pretty well - better than engineers in Mexico or Bangladesh. And last I checked, despite about two decades of so-called recession, Japanese society is doing pretty well, stupid people and all.
    , @Realist
    "“more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”, which “will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment”."

    Yes , more than half. Eighty per cent or more.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Josh says: • Website

    Steve, watch what norm Macdonald does in his YouTube interview with Margaret cho with respect to frontlash. He never makes the joke, he just lets the tow oblivious liberals siting next to him make it, and he just lets it sit there.

    Starts just before the 32 minute mark.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Nkddddt_IVE

    Read More
    • Replies: @larry lurker
    Oh man. Norm's "friend" who he doesn't want to identify is Norm himself - he's quoting one of his own tweets.

    Also, I'm pretty sure Adam is just playing along so they can get Cho's natural reaction.
    , @Vinteuil
    31:55 - 32:35 - absolutely brutal. his guests simply have no idea what he's just done to them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Katz just wants to look inside and see if Emma Lazarus’s poem is inscribed inside those pedestals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. Beene says:

    Truth-teller Sailer strikes again! First no Jewish architects. And now, whoever has heard of a Jewish scientist? Especially one with a five-letter-long surname? Of course, Donald Trump himself paternally descends from an ethnic group known for its short, easy to spell and pronounce last names.

    Keep telling it like it is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dave Pinsen
    Are there any Jewish golf course architects though?
    , @anonymous
    Jewish architects ... do you really want to go there? Not so pretty.
    , @Njguy73
    "Salk" is four letters. Would that work?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @syonredux
    HG Wells has gotta go:

    While Nature’s editorial purported to object to “whitewashing” the past, the magazine has done plenty of whitewashing itself. A profile of novelist HG Wells last year described him as a “science-populariser” driven by a “desire to use writing to make the world better”, often by projecting “utopian” visions. It left out Wells’s enthusiasm for eugenics.
     

    Wells gave a glimpse into his flavour of utopia when he wrote in 1901 that “those swarms of black, and brown, and dirty-white, and yellow people” that fail to be “efficient” would have “to die out and disappear”. He also produced long screeds on Jews. According to Nature, though, Wells embodied the essence of “the scientific method”, which “conferred on its user the authority to rethink and challenge stale ideas”. When a £50,000 bronze statue of Wells was unveiled last year in Woking, Surrey, an official said the statue was meant to “inspire future generations of young people to continue in Wells’s legacy”.
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/19/white-supremacist-statues-must-fall-scientists

    The statue erected to honour the man who wanted to smash everything than came before is itself smashed by his ideological children. Delicious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Henry Ford was a well-known Nazi sympathizer and rabid anti-Semite – see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Jew

    We should start a petition to rename his company and foundation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yan Shen
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXyqRxTipN8

    Let's not uh forget his infamous Jew flattening machine...

    , @Barnard
    The Ford Foundation is so left wing, it wouldn't be that surprising if they decided to rename it on their own. They could call the King Foundation after America's greatest saint, but Martin Luther King's heirs would sue them.
    , @Cagey Beast
    The fact is, Ford Corporation would do it and they'd have big grins on their faces at the ceremony. I'll bet you could even get a good dozen of Henry Ford's descendants to come out on the day, apologize and roll around in Dead Sea mud brought over just for the occasion. A bunch of strapping, 20 yr old Holocaust survivors could flog them and everyone would think it was right and good. There are no limits to this stuff anymore.
    , @The King is a Fink
    IBM have been at it too!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
     
    , @Moses
    I'm puzzled why the term "anti-Semite" is used to mean "anti-Jew."

    "Semite" includes many non-Jewish peoples. "Anti-Jew" is narrower and clearer.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Thirdeye says:

    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable. It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity. All races could benefit from eugenics. Subconscious eugenic sense normally figures into sexual attraction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dave Pinsen
    https://twitter.com/hels/status/901861612935680000
    , @Desiderius

    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable.
     
    It still is.

    It's just that the unscrupulous found it profitable to pretend otherwise. Over time so profitable that now they can wantonly inflict that pretense on the rest of us with little repercussion.
    , @grapesoda
    Eugenics is mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita:

    "When irreligion is prominent in the family, the women of the family become corrupt, and from the degradation of womanhood, O descendant of Vrsni, comes unwanted progeny. When there is increase of unwanted population, a hellish situation is created both for the family and for those who destroy the family tradition." Bg 1.40-41

    This knowledge has been around for a long time and is easily observable. It didn't require the discovery of genetics as we know it in the modern sense.
    , @grapesoda

    It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity.
     
    Also because it conflicts with pretty lies that people either want to sell (the sociopaths) or desperately want to believe because they sound all nice (the useful idiots).
    , @Daniel Chieh
    The increasing distance of the average humans from animals and nature in general is promoting increasingly wild fictional ideas.
    , @larry lurker
    From Richard Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution:

    Political opposition to eugenic breeding of humans sometimes spills over into the almost certainly false assertion that it is impossible. Not only is it immoral, you may hear it said, it wouldn’t work. Unfortunately, to say that something is morally wrong, or politically undesirable, is not to say that it wouldn’t work. I have no doubt that, if you set your mind to it and had enough time and enough political power, you could breed a race of superior body-builders, or high-jumpers, or shot-putters; pearl fishers, sumo wrestlers, or sprinters; or (I suspect, although now with less confidence because there are no animal precedents) superior musicians, poets, mathematicians or wine-tasters.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. Yan Shen says:
    @Space Ghost
    Henry Ford was a well-known Nazi sympathizer and rabid anti-Semite - see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Jew

    We should start a petition to rename his company and foundation.

    Let’s not uh forget his infamous Jew flattening machine…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. DriesNK says:
    @Anonymous
    Every. Single. Time.

    Mask slipped off again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ussr andy

    Mask slipped off again.
     
    yes, Katz's.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. jim jones says:

    Every time I walk along Praed Street in London I look up at the room where Alexander Fleming discovered Penicillin. Where would we be without antibiotics?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. jcd1974 says:

    Darwin must be knocked off his pedestal too.

    In the “Voyage of the Beagle” and his diary he had some unkind words about the indigenous populations of South America.

    Will there be anyone left?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. Jack D says:

    Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?

    Well , maybe not Weinstein and Katz but we have Einstein and Born (and 1/4 of all Nobel Prizes, even though the Jews are a tiny fraction of the world population or even the white population). So that’s not chopped liver.

    Maybe if you are black you talk down the accomplishments of the “Great White Men of Science” out of jealousy, which accounts for Chanda’s issue (despite the name, Chanda identifies as “black” even though she is only slightly more black than Rachel Dolezal) but Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don’t know what Katz’s excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bigduke6

    Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don’t know what Katz’s excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity.
     
    It's just hate. Needs no excuse
    , @BB753
    If you're referring to Chanda Chisala, he's a real black man from Zambia.

    http://jsk.stanford.edu/fellows/class-of-2009/chanda-chisala/
    , @JW
    He's a self-hating Jew, http://mondoweiss.net/2017/08/israel-nature-poetry/
    , @Dave Pinsen
    Maybe Steve was thinking more about biology/life sciences, but Jews are fairly well represented there too. Years ago, my father was impressed with the care/bedside manner of one of the attending physicians at Memorial Sloan Kettering's urgent care unit, so he asked me to look up the president of the hospital so he could write him a letter praising the attending. The MSK president then turned out to be Nobel laureate in Physiology or Medicine Harold Varmus.
    , @Wally
    " a tiny fraction of the world population" my ass.

    Jewish law states that Jews are to avoid being counted, therefore many Jews dodge being counted.

    Many Jews do not consider themselves religious, but do consider themselves to be 'Jews', therefore they do not show up as 'Jews' in censuses which count the number of Jews via a question on religious beliefs.

    There are clearly more Jews than we are led to believe.

    see:
    The Numbers Game
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7843

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. Randal says:

    Nonetheless, there has been a persistent effort to manufacture a public image of science as being above the fray of politics – especially since the election of Donald Trump.

    LOL (literally)!

    The sheer depth of the unself-awareness to which the politically correct left sinks never ceases to impress. Perhaps the two most obvious areas for this are freedom of speech and the politicisation of science.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. Thirdeye says:
    @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    "In the early 1970s, Crick defended other prominent racist scientists who proposed a plan where individuals deemed unfit would be paid to undergo sterilisation."

    This is a quite sensible proposal. The individuals would be paid, not forced to undergo sterilization.

    Norplant for welfare. It would be reversible sterilization and an incentive to get her act together if she wants children.

    Irresponsible reproduction has social consequences at least as bad as irresponsible driving. Driving is a licensed, revocable privilege.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @Beene
    Truth-teller Sailer strikes again! First no Jewish architects. And now, whoever has heard of a Jewish scientist? Especially one with a five-letter-long surname? Of course, Donald Trump himself paternally descends from an ethnic group known for its short, easy to spell and pronounce last names.

    Keep telling it like it is.

    Are there any Jewish golf course architects though?

    Read More
    • LOL: Frau Katze
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Thirdeye says:

    I can think of one Weinstein statue I’d like to see – Brett Weinstein in the quad of The Evergreen State College!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. @Anonymous
    Every. Single. Time.

    I know right.

    It’s almost like they want to be hated and despised.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. TG says:

    Indeed. And how about all those great white scientists like Albert Einstein (there is no truth to the rumor that he changed his name so that he would sound more intelligent) and Hans Bethe and Eric Kandel and Wolfgang Pauli and Albert Michelson etc.etc.etc.? The list is so long that wikipedia needs two pages for the entry!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Jewish_American_scientists

    Surely we should purge these unabashed scions of white privilege as well?

    Or perhaps… we should realize that while we are whining about the absurdities of identity politics, we are throwing trillions of dollars away on pointless winless wars on the other side of the world, the big banks are getting direct and indirect subsidies to the tune of trillions of dollars while the real economy is being starved of investment capital, Equifax basically gave away the personal financial information of (at least) half the US population to organized crime and will probably make money from this fiasco (and don’t get me started on how Equifax has been put in charge of the secure social security access portal!) well I could go on. The people who are making money off of the above abuses are very happy that we are enraged about identity politics. That’s why they fund it, and give it so much press coverage. Just saying.

    Maybe the best thing we could do about clowns like Katz is ignore them. Attention and outrage just encourage yahoos like that. I suggest that maybe we have better battles to fight. IMHO.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. bigduke6 says:
    @Jack D

    Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    Well , maybe not Weinstein and Katz but we have Einstein and Born (and 1/4 of all Nobel Prizes, even though the Jews are a tiny fraction of the world population or even the white population). So that's not chopped liver.

    Maybe if you are black you talk down the accomplishments of the "Great White Men of Science" out of jealousy, which accounts for Chanda's issue (despite the name, Chanda identifies as "black" even though she is only slightly more black than Rachel Dolezal) but Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don't know what Katz's excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity.

    Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don’t know what Katz’s excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity.

    It’s just hate. Needs no excuse

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Barnard says:
    @Space Ghost
    Henry Ford was a well-known Nazi sympathizer and rabid anti-Semite - see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Jew

    We should start a petition to rename his company and foundation.

    The Ford Foundation is so left wing, it wouldn’t be that surprising if they decided to rename it on their own. They could call the King Foundation after America’s greatest saint, but Martin Luther King’s heirs would sue them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Beene
    Truth-teller Sailer strikes again! First no Jewish architects. And now, whoever has heard of a Jewish scientist? Especially one with a five-letter-long surname? Of course, Donald Trump himself paternally descends from an ethnic group known for its short, easy to spell and pronounce last names.

    Keep telling it like it is.

    Jewish architects … do you really want to go there? Not so pretty.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    "So true", as Trump says. The work of Jewish architects are one of the strongest arguments for Zionism that I know of. When the people who smash things are given money to build things, they create destructive buildings.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. TG says:
    @europeasant
    “more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”, which “will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment”.

    That seems about right.

    Reply to europeasant. Indeed. But you know, I bet that more than half the difference between the average IQ of stupid white Americans and smart white Americans is also due to genetic reasons? But so what. A healthy society needs truck drivers and plumbers as much as (if not more than) theoretical physicists and brain surgeons. In a tight labor market, all labor – skilled and unskilled alike – can do pretty good. That perhaps some races are, ON AVERAGE, possibly less smart than others, only matters if we adhere to rigid numerical racial quotas for high-skill professions. As far as the society as a whole, so what? I mean, there’s lots of stupid people in Japan. But with a tight labor market, Japanese truck drivers and janitors do pretty well – better than engineers in Mexico or Bangladesh. And last I checked, despite about two decades of so-called recession, Japanese society is doing pretty well, stupid people and all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bomag

    But you know, I bet that more than half the difference between the average IQ of... is also due to genetic reasons
     
    Uhm, yeah, I agree with what you said; but europeasant's point was that what Francis Crick said comports with the evidence, but Yarden Katz acts like there is something fundamentally false about it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. JimB says:

    We are entering the Diversity Dark Age. Humanity is being forced to take a time out by stupid, humorless daycare workers. Here’s hoping malevolent space aliens come along to thin the heard.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. @Space Ghost
    Henry Ford was a well-known Nazi sympathizer and rabid anti-Semite - see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Jew

    We should start a petition to rename his company and foundation.

    The fact is, Ford Corporation would do it and they’d have big grins on their faces at the ceremony. I’ll bet you could even get a good dozen of Henry Ford’s descendants to come out on the day, apologize and roll around in Dead Sea mud brought over just for the occasion. A bunch of strapping, 20 yr old Holocaust survivors could flog them and everyone would think it was right and good. There are no limits to this stuff anymore.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Lmao what if the leader of the First Amerikan Reich is a direct descendant of Henry Ford.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Maybe it’s time we took the mediocre Jewish men of science off their pedestals:

    Yarden Katz is a fellow in the department of systems biology at Harvard Medical School and an affiliate of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University

    — The Guardian

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    They could have just regressed to the mean, but no Jews have to outdo everyone in everything so they regressed way on past it.
    , @Shaq
    Hmmm... systems biology.... I seem to recall someone who used to work at Google with that background.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. RudyM says:

    Why are there still medical centers named after Maimonides?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. @Charles Pewitt
    The WASP / Jew ruling class is evil and it must be obliterated. Katz should be encouraged to relocate to a non-European nation -- Uganda would be perfect. Katz is a Harvard Jew who perfectly exemplifies the anti-White atmosphere that pervades the Ivy League.

    Yarden Katz is not just any Jewish Harvard Professor.

    https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/ykatz

    Yarden Katz is a departmental fellow in Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School. His scientific interests are at the interface of artificial intelligence and biology. At Berkman Klein, he is working on understanding the politics and culture of biomedical science. He is particularly interested in how scientific projects are influenced by fields thought to be external to science, like journalism and economics. What questions are prioritized, and which directions get sidelined, by seemingly “non-scientific” considerations? How do these external factors affect the building of a “commons” in biomedical science – and what can biomedical science learn from the software world about commons-building? He will focus on how privatization and the machinery of “intellectual property” law change the practice of academic biomedical research.

    Remember James Damore was working on his PH.D in Systems Biology at Harvard when he left for Google.

    Maybe knowing that Katz would be inspecting his thesis for anything politically incorrect was why Damore left Harvard for an elite programmer job Google in the first place?

    Oh well out of the frying pan and into the fire.

    No Place for White Men!!!

    Read More
    • Agree: G Pinfold
    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
    I would not be surprised in the least to find out that Harvard Katz was known to James Damore of Google fame, and that Damore escaped Harvard because the Katz types were getting on his nerves.

    Katz is perhaps pushing things too far in terms of attacking Whitey, he may not like the results of his efforts.
    , @RonaldB
    "He studied philosophy and artificial intelligence as an undergraduate at the University of Maryland and received his PhD in Brain and Cognitive Sciences from MIT."

    Katz has impressive credentials. But, a degree in artificial intelligence and a PhD in Cognitive Sciences from MIT implies a very sharp cookie completely familiar with mathematics and neurology.

    And yet, Katz completely focuses on the political side of science, which is not really science at all, but pop sociology. So, has Katz chucked his original scholastic efforts? Or, did his technical work consistently not cut the mustard, and he found the path to tenure and academic prominence through the "softer" routes of writing about the influence of racism and privilege on the development of science? His politicized talk certainly does not fit the profile of the technical person interested in problems of nature.
    , @anon
    "Maybe knowing that Katz would be inspecting his thesis for anything politically incorrect was why Damore left Harvard for an elite programmer job Google in the first place? "

    No. Katz is a freakin' postdoc who struggles to publish scientific articles. It's extremely unlikely he'd be invited to be on a PhD thesis committee in lieu of a faculty member.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. From a tactical viewpoint, SJWs would do well to stick to the specious version of white supremacy – the contentless, schoolyard-insult version that’s used to impede argument and diminish the standing of anyone who they disagree with. One might argue that this tactic is losing potency, but there’s no question that it still works to some degree in many contexts.

    On the other hand, writing articles that directly call attention to the real version of white supremacy, the inarguable fact that white inventiveness and industry have utterly dominated the creation of virtually all good things, at least prior to the 1975 or so, is doing their side no favors.

    Even the cleverest progs can’t argue against things like, “more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”. And every time they attempt to do so, they end up making themselves look like the foolish dilettantes with superstitious worldviews that they are. This simultaneously further discredits them and causes the more inquisitive reader, who often has not spent a great deal of time thinking about these things, to seriously question not only the obviously flimsy arguments being proffered by the ignorant author but also every other thing that he’s heard a leftist say.

    If you can only win with rhetoric, it’s foolish to try logic.

    That’s not to mention the optics of a self-conscious Jew citing other Jews as to why whites should be further dispossessed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
    In this case, SJW might be the wrong label. We might call the author a JSW - jewish supremacist warrior.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. its claim that women are less capable than men in certain jobs

    What a maroon.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res


    its claim that women are less capable than men in certain jobs
     
    What a maroon.

     

    There is nothing quite like a misleading paraphrase of someone else's words to establish that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. jackmcg says:

    Had to click over to the article to see if he did the usual liberal thing of pretending it was actually Rosalind Franklin who discovered the DNA double helix, and not Watson and Crick. He did.

    Of course, you see. Two evil white male protestants STOLE a Jewish woman’s discovery of DNA.

    Its mostly crap. By most reliable accounts Rosalind Franklin was a good lab hand but was certainly nowhere close to elucidating the structure of DNA. Some of her x-ray diffraction pictures just confirmed Watson and Crick’s theories. Big whoop.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  45. @Buzz Mohawk
    Maybe it's time we took the mediocre Jewish men of science off their pedestals:

    Yarden Katz is a fellow in the department of systems biology at Harvard Medical School and an affiliate of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University

    -- The Guardian
     

    They could have just regressed to the mean, but no Jews have to outdo everyone in everything so they regressed way on past it.

    Read More
    • LOL: AM
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Negrolphin Pool
    From a tactical viewpoint, SJWs would do well to stick to the specious version of white supremacy - the contentless, schoolyard-insult version that's used to impede argument and diminish the standing of anyone who they disagree with. One might argue that this tactic is losing potency, but there's no question that it still works to some degree in many contexts.

    On the other hand, writing articles that directly call attention to the real version of white supremacy, the inarguable fact that white inventiveness and industry have utterly dominated the creation of virtually all good things, at least prior to the 1975 or so, is doing their side no favors.

    Even the cleverest progs can't argue against things like, “more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”. And every time they attempt to do so, they end up making themselves look like the foolish dilettantes with superstitious worldviews that they are. This simultaneously further discredits them and causes the more inquisitive reader, who often has not spent a great deal of time thinking about these things, to seriously question not only the obviously flimsy arguments being proffered by the ignorant author but also every other thing that he's heard a leftist say.

    If you can only win with rhetoric, it's foolish to try logic.

    That's not to mention the optics of a self-conscious Jew citing other Jews as to why whites should be further dispossessed.

    In this case, SJW might be the wrong label. We might call the author a JSW – jewish supremacist warrior.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. I once saw a documentary on aspiring child actors and their delusional stage mothers.

    The Hollywood Complex (2011)
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1754351

    One of the talent agents had a line that to me also brings to mind the well-intentioned nonsense grade school guidance councilors that feel obligated to tell young girls that they can be every bit as good a engineer and scientist as any boy.

    “Acting is the only activity where a child can die from encouragement.”

    There is very cruel side to telling young girls with limited ability that they can over come biology and be as good at something as boys.

    On the other hand I remember way back in the early nineties being sent to a mandated corporate diversity workshop in Chicago. We men were lectured to by an obviously not very feminine Jewish lesbian Marxist that the reason Cindy Crawford did not go to Northwestern University and study Chemical Engineering on a full scholarship that was awarded to her as a high school junior instead of becoming a mega millionaire supermodel was because of the sexism of men.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_Crawford

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  48. “all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames”
    I didn’t heretofore know that I belong to a secret tribe of noble distinction, but, yeah, I am one of those five-letter Protestants. Steve, no need to envy me because you are one letter taller. However, I am at a loss as to how to namewash Mr. Katz. There is probably no alternative to him making the Herculean effort of writing a couple of paragraphs of factually accurate prose, however many years it might take him.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  49. Luke Lea says:

    Does that mean we can tear the members of the Frankfurt School off their pedestals too? How about the global warming alarmists? Psychoanalysts? French Structuralists and Deconstructionists? Most pundits?
    Anybody else?

    Read More
    • Replies: @bartok
    Psychoanalysis is a great example of a scientific fad/fraud driven by Jews.
    Climate change is the current example - isn't it weird that its 'discoveries' originated at Penn State and East Anglia, not at Caltech and Cambridge?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Njguy73 says:
    @Beene
    Truth-teller Sailer strikes again! First no Jewish architects. And now, whoever has heard of a Jewish scientist? Especially one with a five-letter-long surname? Of course, Donald Trump himself paternally descends from an ethnic group known for its short, easy to spell and pronounce last names.

    Keep telling it like it is.

    “Salk” is four letters. Would that work?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @Josh
    Steve, watch what norm Macdonald does in his YouTube interview with Margaret cho with respect to frontlash. He never makes the joke, he just lets the tow oblivious liberals siting next to him make it, and he just lets it sit there.

    Starts just before the 32 minute mark.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Nkddddt_IVE

    Oh man. Norm’s “friend” who he doesn’t want to identify is Norm himself – he’s quoting one of his own tweets.

    Also, I’m pretty sure Adam is just playing along so they can get Cho’s natural reaction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. res says:
    @Desiderius

    its claim that women are less capable than men in certain jobs
     
    What a maroon.

    its claim that women are less capable than men in certain jobs

    What a maroon.

    There is nothing quite like a misleading paraphrase of someone else’s words to establish that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer


    but Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don’t know what Katz’s excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity

    Jews thoroughly indoctrinated in traditional Jewish supremacist culture cannot tolerate goy high achievement. Every instance of world beating by white goyim suggests that the Jews are not The Chosen People.

    This psychological conflict can only be solved by expunging the evidence.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Tyrion
    Steve, the guy is a loser.

    He is certainly no pro-Jewish advocate. He is no hypocrite as you imply. Just an all round idiot.

    Here is another quote of his:

    "If we only dare look (at Israel), we see that there’s apartheid and much more."

    He’s getting high on his own supply.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. BB753 says:
    @Jack D

    Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    Well , maybe not Weinstein and Katz but we have Einstein and Born (and 1/4 of all Nobel Prizes, even though the Jews are a tiny fraction of the world population or even the white population). So that's not chopped liver.

    Maybe if you are black you talk down the accomplishments of the "Great White Men of Science" out of jealousy, which accounts for Chanda's issue (despite the name, Chanda identifies as "black" even though she is only slightly more black than Rachel Dolezal) but Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don't know what Katz's excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity.

    If you’re referring to Chanda Chisala, he’s a real black man from Zambia.

    http://jsk.stanford.edu/fellows/class-of-2009/chanda-chisala/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. If They is the same Yarden Katz that tweets under @queenyar then you guys have been using the wrong pronouns.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  57. Doesn’t anybody have this internet thingee?

    Katz writes for Mondoweiss:

    http://mondoweiss.net/2015/10/talks-about-israelpalestine/

    Prescod-Weinstein speaks at ”Jewish’ Voice for Peace’ events

    https://nmm.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/program/

    I wouldn’t worry about their wishes for more names like theirs on pedestals.

    (Yes I know that Jews can’t be anti-Jew, just like I know that Whites can’t be anti-White, Americans can’t be anti-American, Russians can’t be anti-Russians, Heterosexuals can’t be anti-heterosexual…)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry134564
    Have you noticed that that anti-Israel conspiracy site Mondoweiss itself is part of this very website? If anything, the far-left and the far-right are in an increasingly open alliance or alignment (well it's nothing new - see Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact), with their enemies appearing to be intelligent people of all kinds.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?

    If you knew anything about science or maths (which knowledge appears to be sadly lacking), you would know there were more than enough Yiddish origin names in it. However, in this case Weinstein and Katz are both anti-Israel writers, who publish on Mondoweiss, which is part of this very website – which highlights again the similarity (in this case out in the open) between the far-left and the far-right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    You have missed Steve's point. His post is a criticism of Jewish animus (Steve would probably describe it here as envy or greed or insecurity) with respect to perceived out-groups, especially Gentile Europeans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @anony-mouse
    Doesn't anybody have this internet thingee?

    Katz writes for Mondoweiss:

    http://mondoweiss.net/2015/10/talks-about-israelpalestine/

    Prescod-Weinstein speaks at ''Jewish' Voice for Peace' events

    https://nmm.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/program/

    I wouldn't worry about their wishes for more names like theirs on pedestals.

    (Yes I know that Jews can't be anti-Jew, just like I know that Whites can't be anti-White, Americans can't be anti-American, Russians can't be anti-Russians, Heterosexuals can't be anti-heterosexual...)

    Have you noticed that that anti-Israel conspiracy site Mondoweiss itself is part of this very website? If anything, the far-left and the far-right are in an increasingly open alliance or alignment (well it’s nothing new – see Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact), with their enemies appearing to be intelligent people of all kinds.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. @Sarah Toga
    And as everybody knows, all evil in all of history was committed only by Whites.

    Orientals, Africans, Middle Easterners - their histories are pure sweetness and light.

    Sarah, and of course the violence committed by non-whites is the result of their interaction with whites. All Amerindians were peace loving and kind until the Europeans landed here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. inertial says:

    From the comments:

    Liberal unable to mention any historical figure without adding that they were racist.

    A LIBERAL man is unable to discuss any writers, musicians or historical figures born before 1970 without mentioning that they were racist.

    Nathan Muir of Brighton has so far today clarified that Harold Macmillan, Terry Thomas, Dame Thora Hird and John Lennon were racist, that Isambard Kingdom Brunel and Houdini were sexist, and that Sir Arthur ‘Bomber’ Harris was a homophobe.

    [...]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  62. Dr. X says:

    There are also institutional monuments within science to be revisited. Britain’s prestigious biomedical research institute, the Crick, is named after Francis Crick, famous for his Nobel-prizewinning work on the double helix structure of DNA with James Watson. Both were proponents of eugenics.

    So… Mr. (((Katz))) is critical of eugenics, when his Tribe has been engaged in selective breeding for five thousand years? My goodness, now that’s rich…

    Read More
    • Agree: ben tillman
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. David says:
    @syonredux
    HG Wells has gotta go:

    While Nature’s editorial purported to object to “whitewashing” the past, the magazine has done plenty of whitewashing itself. A profile of novelist HG Wells last year described him as a “science-populariser” driven by a “desire to use writing to make the world better”, often by projecting “utopian” visions. It left out Wells’s enthusiasm for eugenics.
     

    Wells gave a glimpse into his flavour of utopia when he wrote in 1901 that “those swarms of black, and brown, and dirty-white, and yellow people” that fail to be “efficient” would have “to die out and disappear”. He also produced long screeds on Jews. According to Nature, though, Wells embodied the essence of “the scientific method”, which “conferred on its user the authority to rethink and challenge stale ideas”. When a £50,000 bronze statue of Wells was unveiled last year in Woking, Surrey, an official said the statue was meant to “inspire future generations of young people to continue in Wells’s legacy”.
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/19/white-supremacist-statues-must-fall-scientists

    HG Wells published The Outline of History four or five years after Birth of a Nation was made. Discussing slavery in the United States he says…

    The Massachusetts constitution of 1780 had declared that “all men are born free and equal.” A certain negro, Quaco, put this to the test in 1783, and in that year the soil of Massachusetts became like the soil of Britain, intolerant of slavery; to tread upon it was to become free.

    There was in Virginia a strong party in favour of emancipating slaves. But they demanded that the emancipated slaves should leave the state within a year or be outlawed! They were naturally alarmed at the possibility that a free barbaric black community, many of its members African-born and reeking with traditions of cannibalism and secret and dreadful religious rites, should arise beside them upon Virginian soil. When we consider that point of view, we can understand why it was that a large number of Virginians should be disposed to retain the mass of blacks in the country under control as slaves, while at the same time they were bitterly opposed to the slave trade and the importation of any fresh blood from Africa. The free blacks, one sees, might easily become a nuisance; indeed the free state of Massachusetts presently closed its borders to their entry….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. JW says:
    @Jack D

    Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    Well , maybe not Weinstein and Katz but we have Einstein and Born (and 1/4 of all Nobel Prizes, even though the Jews are a tiny fraction of the world population or even the white population). So that's not chopped liver.

    Maybe if you are black you talk down the accomplishments of the "Great White Men of Science" out of jealousy, which accounts for Chanda's issue (despite the name, Chanda identifies as "black" even though she is only slightly more black than Rachel Dolezal) but Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don't know what Katz's excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. @Sarah Toga
    And as everybody knows, all evil in all of history was committed only by Whites.

    Orientals, Africans, Middle Easterners - their histories are pure sweetness and light.

    Orientals, Africans, Middle Easterners – their histories are pure sweetness and light.

    I agree – and that’s why everything is so easy, worldwide, btw.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Lot says:

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?

    You’ve become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying

    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”

    Peace out.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    Thank you Sailer, for this alone.
    , @Yan Shen
    Ciao!
    , @Vinteuil
    Lot - Sailer may be Giraldi's co-blogger, but you can't blame him for every crazy thing Giraldi writes.

    The whole point of this website, as I understand it, is to let a thousand flowers bloom.
    , @Simon's Blood
    In what way does Steve Sailer "have" Philip Girladi write what he writes? Do you think that Giraldi takes his cue to discuss pernicious jew influence on American foreign policy from Sailer?
    , @anon
    Don't let the door …
    , @Stan d Mute
    But both are very valid points aren't they? The problem is that Noticing the number of Jewish war agitators or Noticing the (still) largely Jewish led communists eternal mission to stamp out the infernal white middle class appears like red meat to the Jew-hater conspiracy theorists.

    So-called "dual loyalty" is impossible. And combined with influence and power it leads directly to Treason. Jews' fascination with communism looks odd given their lofty perch in modern Europe/America but much can be explained just within Jewry if one thinks of the gulf between a Sheldon Adelson and a communist agitating assistant professor of sociology. Sailer has made this point well using golf clubs as examples. Jews are over-achievers and their spillover effect is enormous.

    My pet peeve is Agency. Whites who blame Jews are denying agency in their own failure. Jews who cry "victim" are denying agency in their failure. The former is arguably worse - whinging that a tiny readily identifiable minority has taken control of nearly every aspect of your life and you had no role in it is just pathetic. Whinging that the majority hates you when you refuse to assimilate after migrating is just slightly less pathetic. And that it's all a sectarian dispute about mythology is most pathetic of all when we are facing the prospect of a 4 Billion strong population from whom we have 50,000-100,000 years of evolutionary divergence.
    , @Judah Benjamin Hur
    Keep in mind the Daily Stormer market is up for grabs.
    , @Chrisnonymous
    Sorry to see you go. I, for one, agree about the tediousness.
    , @biz
    I agree its tiresome, and for a person whose trademark is noticing things, Steve doesn't do much noticing that most of the leftist Jews that he pillories are actually anti-Israel and not very pro-Jewish. This Katz fellow is a writer at Mondoweiss, which surely Steve is aware of since it is highlighted in his alternate media selections.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    Thank you Sailer, for this alone.

    Read More
    • Troll: Chrisnonymous
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. 3g4me says:
    @John Gruskos
    Don't be bitter just because your ancestors were wasting their average 115 IQs swindling Polish peasants, while the Anglo-Saxons were using their average 100 IQs to create science, the industrial revolution, representative government, end slavery, explore the globe etc.

    @#9 John Gruskos: “Don’t be bitter just because your ancestors were wasting their average 115 IQs swindling Polish peasants, while the Anglo-Saxons were using their average 100 IQs to create science, the industrial revolution, representative government, end slavery, explore the globe etc.”

    Top top top kek.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @Space Ghost
    Henry Ford was a well-known Nazi sympathizer and rabid anti-Semite - see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Jew

    We should start a petition to rename his company and foundation.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. “Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?”

    Geez Steve, what are you trying to do? Give JPod an aneurism?

    Read More
    • LOL: Bubba
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  71. There are plenty of non-disgusting non-WASP scientists like Semelweiss, Oppenheimer, and Einstein, but I’m sure the Cultural Commissars will be going after them any moment. Because not woke enough.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. Dahlia says:
    @Anonymous
    The guardian article is just more evidence that multi-religious, multi-ethnic, multiracial society means STRIFE.

    Eternal strife.

    Endless "counting coup" is the future as the braves of warrior tribes do their thing.

    For real. Isn’t this the greatest argument *against* multiculturalism?

    I’ve pointed out before the drive for reconciliation, often forgotten because of reconstruction, that drove the North to honor some of the heroes of the South as a way to heal wounds, bring their brothers back into the fold, and I’ve wondered recently if such a thing is possible in the future.

    I’ve got to believe that it is, that the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death is an artifact of our extreme cocooning-meets-huge-wealth-chasm era. But other times, I wonder if it’s a pipe dream.
    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?

    Yes, they could do it because they were White, Christian men of nearly identical ethnic backgrounds. And, no, I don't think the people alive now would be able to show the same broadness of spirit.
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    The conciliation began with Lincoln, and all of it was based on honor. Today, most Democrats, and all establishment Republicans have no honor. Antifa is the antithesis of honor, just as all of Marxism is dishonorable.

    The "the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death" is due entirely to the Left's insistence that this be a death match, bereft of not just honor, but reason, experience and common sense. Our opponents are post-rational (as one of our interlocutors has already pointed out - I am sorry to have forgotten whom to cite) so the use of reason has the same utility when used with them as it does with a rabid dog.

    The dishonesty, tendentiousness, and preening self-righteousness of the Left ensures that the political solution we need excludes them.
    , @Desiderius

    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?
     
    That and children of God Almighty.
    , @Maj. Kong
    Multikult can work, it just requires an incorruptible police state like Singapore. But I don't see any kind of LKY-like brilliance in our political elite.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Yan Shen says:
    @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    Ciao!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Vinteuil says:
    @Josh
    Steve, watch what norm Macdonald does in his YouTube interview with Margaret cho with respect to frontlash. He never makes the joke, he just lets the tow oblivious liberals siting next to him make it, and he just lets it sit there.

    Starts just before the 32 minute mark.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Nkddddt_IVE

    31:55 – 32:35 – absolutely brutal. his guests simply have no idea what he’s just done to them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Dahlia says:

    I will forever link to the Reconciliation Quilt when this topic comes up :)

    It’s truly a wonderful relic from a beautiful age and spirit: Slavery had been vanquished and the winners wanted to bring the losers back into the fold and declare that regardless of the absolute bloody toll, we were all Americans.

    (One day, Steve will let me do like Jody with his famous magnum opus on rock music, a report on American quilts :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    Reconciliation Quilt, you say?

    Disclaimer: The following video is extremely un-PC, ambiguously tongue-in-cheek, and contains esoteric alt-right references and crude animation. The content therein is the sole property of its creator and does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of J.I.E. LLC

    https://youtu.be/5AMuosWJ6Wk?t=46s
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. MEH 0910 says:

    “it’s 2017, and to some extent scientific literature still supports a patriarchal view that ranks a man’s intellect above a woman’s”.

    Hell, it’s 2017, and to some extent scientific literature still supports a soggiest view that water is wet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  77. bartok says:
    @Luke Lea
    Does that mean we can tear the members of the Frankfurt School off their pedestals too? How about the global warming alarmists? Psychoanalysts? French Structuralists and Deconstructionists? Most pundits?
    Anybody else?

    Psychoanalysis is a great example of a scientific fad/fraud driven by Jews.
    Climate change is the current example – isn’t it weird that its ‘discoveries’ originated at Penn State and East Anglia, not at Caltech and Cambridge?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion

    Psychoanalysis is a great example of a scientific fad/fraud driven by Jews.
     
    The throwaway arrogance of the ignorant. If you'd read Freud you'd probably like him. He was a realist and his work is thoroughly unprogressive.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Shaq says:
    @Buzz Mohawk
    Maybe it's time we took the mediocre Jewish men of science off their pedestals:

    Yarden Katz is a fellow in the department of systems biology at Harvard Medical School and an affiliate of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University

    -- The Guardian
     

    Hmmm… systems biology…. I seem to recall someone who used to work at Google with that background.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. I’ve noticed that the Weinsteins and Katzs of the world have basically given up on trying to refute the claims of real scientists. They simply point, kvetch and head for the fainting mikvah (would that there were such a thing).

    Its always Annudah Shoah.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  80. Vinteuil says:
    @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    Lot – Sailer may be Giraldi’s co-blogger, but you can’t blame him for every crazy thing Giraldi writes.

    The whole point of this website, as I understand it, is to let a thousand flowers bloom.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    I was hoping for that too, but if that was really the case, you'd think somewhere in those thousand flowers could be one that has something nuanced to say about Israel and/or is generally positive on Jewish contributions to America.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @Dahlia
    For real. Isn't this the greatest argument *against* multiculturalism?

    I've pointed out before the drive for reconciliation, often forgotten because of reconstruction, that drove the North to honor some of the heroes of the South as a way to heal wounds, bring their brothers back into the fold, and I've wondered recently if such a thing is possible in the future.

    I've got to believe that it is, that the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death is an artifact of our extreme cocooning-meets-huge-wealth-chasm era. But other times, I wonder if it's a pipe dream.
    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?

    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?

    Yes, they could do it because they were White, Christian men of nearly identical ethnic backgrounds. And, no, I don’t think the people alive now would be able to show the same broadness of spirit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. I wonder if Mr. (((Katz))) favors removing Albert Einstein and Jonas Salk from their pedestals?

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz

    I wonder if Mr. (((Katz))) favors removing Albert Einstein and Jonas Salk from their pedestals?
     
    Yes he probably does, because, for the millionth time, Yarden Katz writes for the virulently and tediously anti-Israel Mondoweiss blog.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Roger says:

    It is funny to see elite Jews complaining about non-Jews and eugenics. Jews have practiced eugenics more than any other ethnic group. Apparently they want to keep their secret to themselves, so that they can better compete against non-Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  84. @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    In what way does Steve Sailer “have” Philip Girladi write what he writes? Do you think that Giraldi takes his cue to discuss pernicious jew influence on American foreign policy from Sailer?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    Don’t let the door …

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. We should work tirelessly to improve all useful flora and fauna, except humans because that’s eugenic!

    But we must mate only with our own ethics (unless we are non-Chosen whites) because our group is special.

    What would our friends on the left spend their time doing if not justifying their hypocrisies?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  87. eah says:

    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    https://twitter.com/Brannon1776/status/775848726556315648
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. LKM says:

    So when it comes time to have kids, will Katz forego testing for Ashkenazi genetic diseases on the grounds that they’re a manifestation of eugenics?

    From the website of the Dor Yeshorim organization:

    Dor Yeshorim was built on the premise that fatal and debilitating recessive genetic disorders, prevalent in Jewish circles, have absolutely no reason to be perpetuated.

    Well if that isn’t the most hateful thing I’ve ever heard…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  89. @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    But both are very valid points aren’t they? The problem is that Noticing the number of Jewish war agitators or Noticing the (still) largely Jewish led communists eternal mission to stamp out the infernal white middle class appears like red meat to the Jew-hater conspiracy theorists.

    So-called “dual loyalty” is impossible. And combined with influence and power it leads directly to Treason. Jews’ fascination with communism looks odd given their lofty perch in modern Europe/America but much can be explained just within Jewry if one thinks of the gulf between a Sheldon Adelson and a communist agitating assistant professor of sociology. Sailer has made this point well using golf clubs as examples. Jews are over-achievers and their spillover effect is enormous.

    My pet peeve is Agency. Whites who blame Jews are denying agency in their own failure. Jews who cry “victim” are denying agency in their failure. The former is arguably worse – whinging that a tiny readily identifiable minority has taken control of nearly every aspect of your life and you had no role in it is just pathetic. Whinging that the majority hates you when you refuse to assimilate after migrating is just slightly less pathetic. And that it’s all a sectarian dispute about mythology is most pathetic of all when we are facing the prospect of a 4 Billion strong population from whom we have 50,000-100,000 years of evolutionary divergence.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. @Peter Johnson
    I am not sure that the Guardian will advance the Mainstream Narrative by reproducing thoughtful old quotes as in this article:

    Crick wrote in one letter that “more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”, which “will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment”.

    That evaluation/prediction has certainly stood the test of time! Mainstream scientific understanding of human biodiversity has retreated, rather than advanced, since Crick wrote that. Was that in the 1950s?

    IIRC, Crick wrote that around 1969.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    Close, 1971: https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/ResourceMetadata/SCBBNM

    It is worth noting that he preceded that quote with: "I have formed the opinion that there is much substance to Jensen's arguments. In brief I think it likely that..."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. J1234 says:

    Anyone who thought this would stop with confederate generals was crazy. Eventually the WW2 memorial will come down because those of us who are old enough remember rank and file WW2 veterans know they were race realists, generally speaking. Race realists who defeated the Nazis and other fascists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  92. Moses says:
    @Space Ghost
    Henry Ford was a well-known Nazi sympathizer and rabid anti-Semite - see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Jew

    We should start a petition to rename his company and foundation.

    I’m puzzled why the term “anti-Semite” is used to mean “anti-Jew.”

    “Semite” includes many non-Jewish peoples. “Anti-Jew” is narrower and clearer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @Charles Pewitt
    The WASP / Jew ruling class is evil and it must be obliterated. Katz should be encouraged to relocate to a non-European nation -- Uganda would be perfect. Katz is a Harvard Jew who perfectly exemplifies the anti-White atmosphere that pervades the Ivy League.

    The WASP / Jew ruling class is evil and it must be obliterated.

    Charles old buddy, “Pewitt” is a WASP name.

    “Charles Pewitt” is obviously not your real name.

    I’m guessing that you’re a Beijing boot licker.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    What's a Beijing boot licker?
    , @Charles Pewitt
    David Davenport says:

    Charles old buddy, “Pewitt” is a WASP name.

     

    I say:

    I am a Euro-mongrel with some English ancestry, I in no way identify or qualify for what would be considered as a "WASP." I narrowly define WASP to mean the Northern ruling class at the time when the the United States transformed into an Empire, 1890 or thereabouts, about the time the US Census declared the frontier to be closed. I would also add that to me, WASPs are part of the New England continuum from Portland to Portland. I don't consider Anglo-Norman George Washington to be a WASP; nor do I think the Scotch-Irish Andrew Jackson is a WASP.

    I would suggest that when the snot-nosed skanks go on and on about WASPs they are not just talking about every bastard with English ancestry.

    I would say the Bush family are WASPs, but they have other blood from Europe as well.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. A guy says:
    @Altai
    Yarden Katz. Yarden, really? Can they not even scare up a John Smith to write these things? At least get somebody whose given name isn't a modern Hebrew one.

    It’s not modern Hebrew , but ancient. Yarden is Jordan , as in the River.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Increasingly it is clear that the sins that are most proclaimed to be the most egregious and unforgivable of white men, are in fact much more central to the beliefs and behaviors at the core of the Eskimo people. They project their demons onto others.

    Eugenics is at its core, an Eskimo belief. Zionism and preserving and improving their gene pool are parts of the same eugenic core of the Eskimo people, and even though it has been sent down the memory hole, they were very much part of and even leaders in the eugenic movement prior to its rise among the Nazis, when it suddenly became something they detested (because it went against them).

    Supremacism certainly is. How else to explain how central the idea of a Master race (a chosen people) is to them. Even Christianity, which they so bitterly hate, arose from them.

    White Americans and Brits died en masse fighting the Nazis, freeing the people in concentration camps, and allowed large numbers to flee to the US. Yet we’re constantly labeled with the Nazi epithet. It is they who are not able to see others, don’t see groups beyond a general gentile theme, no difference between white Anglos and white Germans. All are whites, all are of Christian origin, so all are deserving of persecution.

    In fact, given their inability to discriminate among white Gentile groups, this and their longstanding role in the media and academia, one has to wonder whether it was they in fact who came up with the concept of ‘white’ which they now claim to detest so much as the source of all evil? After all, it is endlessly repeated that this was not originally the view of ‘white people’, that we didn’t view Irish or Italians as white, and that the various white groups viewed each other as different races – the British race, the German race, etc. This thing they proclaim as so central to the evil of the white man, may well have come from the Eskimos who now furiously attack it. Much like the black jokes, the gay jokes of Hollywood, etc. of the past often came from Eskimo writers and comedians but are condemned as white (gentile) racism, homophobia, etc.

    It is absolutely idiotic and insane to persecute Nobel prize winning scientists this way. How many Eskimo leaders of yore could stand up to the standards they demand our people from yesteryear be held to? Shall we tear down Moses from a pedestal for murder, and also for condoning slavery?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  96. Svigor says:

    Yarden Katz marries Housen Doge and they live happily ever after.

    Seriously though, I’m guessing this is one of those embarrassingly rare black-Jewish hybrids from one of those embarrassingly rare black-Jewish marriages.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  97. syonredux says:

    Off-topic,

    Don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Watching The Royal Society reach this level of degeneracy…

    “Testosterone Rex triumphs as Royal Society science book of the year
    Psychologist Cordelia Fine’s dissection of the myths that sustain assumptions about sexual difference acclaimed by judges as ‘a cracking critique’”

    “A book that rubbishes the idea of “fundamental” differences between men and women has become the 30th winner of the prestigious Royal Society prize for science book of the year.

    Testosterone Rex by Cordelia Fine review – the question of men’s and women’s brains
    The psychologist provides more evidence that the inequality of the sexes in society is cultural not natural

    Psychologist Cordelia Fine is the third woman in a row to win the £25,000 award, which has been described as the Booker prize for science writing. Her book, Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Our Gendered Minds, follows Gaia Vince’s win for Adventures in the Anthropocene in 2015 and Andrea Wulf’s The Invention of Nature in 2016.

    Judges of the Royal Society Insight Investment science book prize, which was awarded in London on Tuesday, praised Testosterone Rex for its eye-opening, forensic look at gender stereotypes and its urgent call for change.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/19/testosterone-rex-royal-society-science-book-of-the-year-cordelia-fine?CMP=twt_a-science_b-gdnscience

    Read More
    • Replies: @candid_observer
    You mean this Royal Society?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11732143/Sir-Tim-Hunt-deserved-to-lose-his-job-over-chauvinist-comments-Nobel-Prize-winner-says.html

    Paragons of integrity.

    , @slumber_j

    Her book, Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Our Gendered Minds, follows Gaia Vince’s win for Adventures in the Anthropocene in 2015 and Andrea Wulf’s The Invention of Nature in 2016.
     
    So basically Gaia Vince prepared a way in the wilderness for Testosterone Rex. Makes sense!
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    The rot is complete and undeniable. Defunding is one solution. Takeover by sentient beings is another. The average Caenorhabditis elegans is a genius compared to this lot.
    , @Rosamond Vincy
    Anyone who thinks the gendered brain is purely cultural has neither been nor raised a teenager. When those hormones kick in, all bets are off.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. @syonredux
    Off-topic,

    Don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Watching The Royal Society reach this level of degeneracy…

    “Testosterone Rex triumphs as Royal Society science book of the year
    Psychologist Cordelia Fine’s dissection of the myths that sustain assumptions about sexual difference acclaimed by judges as ‘a cracking critique’”

    “A book that rubbishes the idea of “fundamental” differences between men and women has become the 30th winner of the prestigious Royal Society prize for science book of the year.

    Testosterone Rex by Cordelia Fine review – the question of men’s and women’s brains
    The psychologist provides more evidence that the inequality of the sexes in society is cultural not natural

    Psychologist Cordelia Fine is the third woman in a row to win the £25,000 award, which has been described as the Booker prize for science writing. Her book, Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Our Gendered Minds, follows Gaia Vince’s win for Adventures in the Anthropocene in 2015 and Andrea Wulf’s The Invention of Nature in 2016.

    Judges of the Royal Society Insight Investment science book prize, which was awarded in London on Tuesday, praised Testosterone Rex for its eye-opening, forensic look at gender stereotypes and its urgent call for change.”
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/19/testosterone-rex-royal-society-science-book-of-the-year-cordelia-fine?CMP=twt_a-science_b-gdnscience
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. slumber_j says:
    @syonredux
    Off-topic,

    Don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Watching The Royal Society reach this level of degeneracy…

    “Testosterone Rex triumphs as Royal Society science book of the year
    Psychologist Cordelia Fine’s dissection of the myths that sustain assumptions about sexual difference acclaimed by judges as ‘a cracking critique’”

    “A book that rubbishes the idea of “fundamental” differences between men and women has become the 30th winner of the prestigious Royal Society prize for science book of the year.

    Testosterone Rex by Cordelia Fine review – the question of men’s and women’s brains
    The psychologist provides more evidence that the inequality of the sexes in society is cultural not natural

    Psychologist Cordelia Fine is the third woman in a row to win the £25,000 award, which has been described as the Booker prize for science writing. Her book, Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Our Gendered Minds, follows Gaia Vince’s win for Adventures in the Anthropocene in 2015 and Andrea Wulf’s The Invention of Nature in 2016.

    Judges of the Royal Society Insight Investment science book prize, which was awarded in London on Tuesday, praised Testosterone Rex for its eye-opening, forensic look at gender stereotypes and its urgent call for change.”
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/19/testosterone-rex-royal-society-science-book-of-the-year-cordelia-fine?CMP=twt_a-science_b-gdnscience

    Her book, Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Our Gendered Minds, follows Gaia Vince’s win for Adventures in the Anthropocene in 2015 and Andrea Wulf’s The Invention of Nature in 2016.

    So basically Gaia Vince prepared a way in the wilderness for Testosterone Rex. Makes sense!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Svigor says:

    “White Supremacy” means “majority white,” “historically white,” etc. When read that way the term makes a lot more sense, as used.

    Steve, the guy is a loser.

    He is certainly no pro-Jewish advocate. He is no hypocrite as you imply. Just an all round idiot.

    Here is another quote of his:

    “If we only dare look (at Israel), we see that there’s apartheid and much more.”

    Like most Jews and part-Jews, he’s almost certainly insufficiently anti-Zionist to have any credibility at all. Which is, I’m guessing, why you quoted a sentence, rather than linked a piece; because he has no anti-Zionist piece.

    Even if he had an anti-Zionist piece to link, it would be a matter of devoting equal attention to the mote in white eyes, and the beam in Jewish eyes, which would still be totally out of proportion. So, yes, he probably displays an obvious pro-Jewish bias.

    Not that the same thing isn’t baked into the zeitgeist itself (largely by people like Katz and Weinstein in the face of practically zero countervailing effort), mind you.

    He is intellectually honest then, but his angst against the ‘great white men’ is not introspective either. Critical theory is still critical theory and still seeks to tear down or undermine any sense of cohesive identity in Western nations because it makes some people feel unsafe.

    Nonsense. He’s not intellectually honest. Real social triage would be writing pieces about the mountain of western racism, Zionism and Israel, and ignoring (or giving sentences to) the molehill of “White Supremacy.” He’s done the opposite, AFAICT.

    (Yes I know that Jews can’t be anti-Jew, just like I know that Whites can’t be anti-White, Americans can’t be anti-American, Russians can’t be anti-Russians, Heterosexuals can’t be anti-heterosexual…)

    There are anti-Jewish Jews, they’re just vanishingly rare, relative to anti-White whites. Similarly, pro-Jewish Jews are abundant, relative to pro-White Whites. The two groups’ overall attitudes toward both are roughly opposite as well. And the whole picture serves pro-Jewish interests, and works against pro-White interests.

    Doesn’t anybody have this internet thingee?

    Katz writes for Mondoweiss:

    Much better. Now we have 7 pieces that criticize Israeli treatment of Palestinians, to accompany the piece that criticizes White Supremacy (I’m guessing it’s actually “pieces,” and Steve has not linked to his only anti-White piece).

    But if Katz follows the familiar pattern, he centers his criticism on the Israel/Palestine issue, and largely ignores the issue of Jewish White Supremacy.

    On balance I’ll give Katz the benefit of the doubt and call him one of the least bad offenders out there, but he’s still bad; even equal treatment of White Supremacy and Jewish White Supremacy is awful, and I’m guessing Katz doesn’t even get there (nobody ever does).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion
    Don't you feel embarrassed litigating the difference between how anti-Jewish and how more generally anti-white some zealot of progressivism is?

    Also, I only put in one sentence because my point only needed one sentence. Just like yours would have been accurately put across by "Jews make me feel like Whites makes Blacks feel, so where's my social veneration of imagined victimhood?"

    Is there anything less impressive than someone desperately seeking fantasy victim status?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    Keep in mind the Daily Stormer market is up for grabs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AM

    Keep in mind the Daily Stormer market is up for grabs.
     
    Seriously? It's totally okay for Jewish people, of a clear, distinct ethnic origin to bash white people. They can make a living at in public and get respect for it. Meanwhile, the tattooed carnie section of Jewish paranoia gets chased to Iceland, because it's We All Agree That It's Terrible (TM).

    The double standard and the whining gets very, very old. You're not a victim if it's not okay to bash Jews. It's the other way around.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Fitzjames says:
    Read More
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Another aggrieved, indignant Indian, Pankaj Mishra
     
    More like Wankaj Tishra, amirite?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. @Dahlia
    For real. Isn't this the greatest argument *against* multiculturalism?

    I've pointed out before the drive for reconciliation, often forgotten because of reconstruction, that drove the North to honor some of the heroes of the South as a way to heal wounds, bring their brothers back into the fold, and I've wondered recently if such a thing is possible in the future.

    I've got to believe that it is, that the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death is an artifact of our extreme cocooning-meets-huge-wealth-chasm era. But other times, I wonder if it's a pipe dream.
    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?

    The conciliation began with Lincoln, and all of it was based on honor. Today, most Democrats, and all establishment Republicans have no honor. Antifa is the antithesis of honor, just as all of Marxism is dishonorable.

    The “the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death” is due entirely to the Left’s insistence that this be a death match, bereft of not just honor, but reason, experience and common sense. Our opponents are post-rational (as one of our interlocutors has already pointed out – I am sorry to have forgotten whom to cite) so the use of reason has the same utility when used with them as it does with a rabid dog.

    The dishonesty, tendentiousness, and preening self-righteousness of the Left ensures that the political solution we need excludes them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Felix... says:
    @27 year old
    Hello fellow White people...

    Should have included the gif

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. namae nanka says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    The guardian article is just more evidence that multi-religious, multi-ethnic, multiracial society means STRIFE.

    Eternal strife.

    Endless "counting coup" is the future as the braves of warrior tribes do their thing.

    “Now the Suffragettes cannot raise civil war in this soldierly and decisive sense; first, because they are women; and, secondly, because they are very few women. But they can raise something else; which is altogether another pair of shoes.

    “They do not create revolution; what they do create is anarchy; and the difference between these is not a question of violence, but a question of fruitfulness and finality.

    “Revolution of its nature produces government; anarchy only produces more anarchy. (…) You can only knock off the King’s head once. But you can knock off the King’s hat any number of times. Destruction is finite, obstruction is infinite: so long as rebellion takes the form of mere disorder (instead of an attempt to enforce a new order) there is no logical end to it; it can feed on itself and renew itself forever.

    http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2011/06/revolution-or-permanent-anarchy-gk.html?m=1

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. @syonredux
    Off-topic,

    Don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Watching The Royal Society reach this level of degeneracy…

    “Testosterone Rex triumphs as Royal Society science book of the year
    Psychologist Cordelia Fine’s dissection of the myths that sustain assumptions about sexual difference acclaimed by judges as ‘a cracking critique’”

    “A book that rubbishes the idea of “fundamental” differences between men and women has become the 30th winner of the prestigious Royal Society prize for science book of the year.

    Testosterone Rex by Cordelia Fine review – the question of men’s and women’s brains
    The psychologist provides more evidence that the inequality of the sexes in society is cultural not natural

    Psychologist Cordelia Fine is the third woman in a row to win the £25,000 award, which has been described as the Booker prize for science writing. Her book, Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Our Gendered Minds, follows Gaia Vince’s win for Adventures in the Anthropocene in 2015 and Andrea Wulf’s The Invention of Nature in 2016.

    Judges of the Royal Society Insight Investment science book prize, which was awarded in London on Tuesday, praised Testosterone Rex for its eye-opening, forensic look at gender stereotypes and its urgent call for change.”
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/19/testosterone-rex-royal-society-science-book-of-the-year-cordelia-fine?CMP=twt_a-science_b-gdnscience

    The rot is complete and undeniable. Defunding is one solution. Takeover by sentient beings is another. The average Caenorhabditis elegans is a genius compared to this lot.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @27 year old
    Hello fellow White people...

    ugh…someone please explain this one to me…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @John Gruskos
    Don't be bitter just because your ancestors were wasting their average 115 IQs swindling Polish peasants, while the Anglo-Saxons were using their average 100 IQs to create science, the industrial revolution, representative government, end slavery, explore the globe etc.

    The 100 average is of Americans as a whole.
    Anglo-Americans score higher.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. SFG says:

    With all due respect for your very fine prior work, this is kind of silly. Does the antisemitic wing of the commentariat pay *that* well?

    There are a lot of things Jews don’t do well and would envoy the goyim about, but…science? *Science*? That’s about the one thing even the antisemites agree Jews are good at. Einstein may have had a lot of cockamamie left-wing ideas but he was right about science, Salk and Sabin invented the polio vaccine, Haber (and Bosch, who wasn’t) invented the Haber-Bosch process that lets us make fertilizer, Paul Ehrlich made the first antibiotic for syphilis, and God knows how many others. Jews are represented at about 1,000 times expected in Nobel prizes, and if you assume 90% of that is nepotism (and I am sure some of it is), you still have two orders of magnitude to explain.

    I’d stick to complaining about manipulation of foreign policy by neocons (we’re moving in a dangerously warmongering direction as the Bannonites leave and Trump has to fill positions with neocons) and Frankfurt School Cultural Marxism (there has been a lot of real damage to Western Civ from movements such as feminism). You had a lot of good points there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius

    Does the antisemitic wing of the commentariat pay *that* well?
     
    That is beneath you.
    , @Opinionator
    With due respect, I think you may be missing the point of Steve's post. I believe he intends to suggest that Katz's attack against renown Gentile scientists may be (yet another) instance of Jews acting out of ethnocentric motivations to damage the prestige/status/reputation of members of a perceived out-group (and, by extension, of the out-group itself).

    See Sabrina Rubin Erdely, Jann Wenner.

    He isn't suggesting Jewish achievement in the sciences has been found wanting.

    , @Maj. Kong
    Franz Boas supposedly did a great deal of damage to our culture's self-image. I have no more than a cursory interest in the natural and social sciences, but I can't find much evidence as a layman to refute the MacDonald thesis.

    We've come to accept that the economic and social trends of the immediate post-WWII era might be sui generis. It might be just as much that peaceful co-existence between White Christians and Jews in the same country is following the same direction as the postwar Keynesian consensus. There are a lot more of the former, than there are of the latter. And the former gets angrier by the day, as long as significant cuts to immigration are resisted in Washington, not to mention the ongoing cultural rot of feminism and gay pride. Look at the course of my own posting history.

    I can't stand your culture's subversion and hypocrisy. Stop admonishing us, and start convincing your own people to disavow those like Chuck Schumer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. res says:
    @Unladen Swallow
    IIRC, Crick wrote that around 1969.

    Close, 1971: https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/ResourceMetadata/SCBBNM

    It is worth noting that he preceded that quote with: “I have formed the opinion that there is much substance to Jensen’s arguments. In brief I think it likely that…”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Peter Johnson
    Hmmm, now why did Katz leave that out of the quote?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Svigor says:

    SFG says:
    September 20, 2017 at 3:49 am GMT • 200 Words

    You seem to be responding to a voice in your head.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  112. @syonredux
    Off-topic,

    Don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Watching The Royal Society reach this level of degeneracy…

    “Testosterone Rex triumphs as Royal Society science book of the year
    Psychologist Cordelia Fine’s dissection of the myths that sustain assumptions about sexual difference acclaimed by judges as ‘a cracking critique’”

    “A book that rubbishes the idea of “fundamental” differences between men and women has become the 30th winner of the prestigious Royal Society prize for science book of the year.

    Testosterone Rex by Cordelia Fine review – the question of men’s and women’s brains
    The psychologist provides more evidence that the inequality of the sexes in society is cultural not natural

    Psychologist Cordelia Fine is the third woman in a row to win the £25,000 award, which has been described as the Booker prize for science writing. Her book, Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Our Gendered Minds, follows Gaia Vince’s win for Adventures in the Anthropocene in 2015 and Andrea Wulf’s The Invention of Nature in 2016.

    Judges of the Royal Society Insight Investment science book prize, which was awarded in London on Tuesday, praised Testosterone Rex for its eye-opening, forensic look at gender stereotypes and its urgent call for change.”
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/19/testosterone-rex-royal-society-science-book-of-the-year-cordelia-fine?CMP=twt_a-science_b-gdnscience

    Anyone who thinks the gendered brain is purely cultural has neither been nor raised a teenager. When those hormones kick in, all bets are off.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @Jack D

    Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    Well , maybe not Weinstein and Katz but we have Einstein and Born (and 1/4 of all Nobel Prizes, even though the Jews are a tiny fraction of the world population or even the white population). So that's not chopped liver.

    Maybe if you are black you talk down the accomplishments of the "Great White Men of Science" out of jealousy, which accounts for Chanda's issue (despite the name, Chanda identifies as "black" even though she is only slightly more black than Rachel Dolezal) but Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don't know what Katz's excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity.

    Maybe Steve was thinking more about biology/life sciences, but Jews are fairly well represented there too. Years ago, my father was impressed with the care/bedside manner of one of the attending physicians at Memorial Sloan Kettering’s urgent care unit, so he asked me to look up the president of the hospital so he could write him a letter praising the attending. The MSK president then turned out to be Nobel laureate in Physiology or Medicine Harold Varmus.

    Read More
    • Replies: @syonredux

    Maybe Steve was thinking more about biology/life sciences, but Jews are fairly well represented there too
     
    Evolutionary Theory. The big names are distressingly WASPy: RA Fisher, Sewall Wright, George Ledyard Stebbins, WD Hamilton, George Gaylord Simpson, etc
    , @Desiderius

    Maybe Steve was thinking more about biology/life sciences, but Jews are fairly well represented there too.
     
    Steve was lampooning the historical ignorance of Katz and his ilk concerning Jew and goy alike. Jews learned in their own history are not the ones leading the mobs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. @Dahlia
    For real. Isn't this the greatest argument *against* multiculturalism?

    I've pointed out before the drive for reconciliation, often forgotten because of reconstruction, that drove the North to honor some of the heroes of the South as a way to heal wounds, bring their brothers back into the fold, and I've wondered recently if such a thing is possible in the future.

    I've got to believe that it is, that the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death is an artifact of our extreme cocooning-meets-huge-wealth-chasm era. But other times, I wonder if it's a pipe dream.
    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?

    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?

    That and children of God Almighty.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. @SFG
    With all due respect for your very fine prior work, this is kind of silly. Does the antisemitic wing of the commentariat pay *that* well?

    There are a lot of things Jews don't do well and would envoy the goyim about, but...science? *Science*? That's about the one thing even the antisemites agree Jews are good at. Einstein may have had a lot of cockamamie left-wing ideas but he was right about science, Salk and Sabin invented the polio vaccine, Haber (and Bosch, who wasn't) invented the Haber-Bosch process that lets us make fertilizer, Paul Ehrlich made the first antibiotic for syphilis, and God knows how many others. Jews are represented at about 1,000 times expected in Nobel prizes, and if you assume 90% of that is nepotism (and I am sure some of it is), you still have two orders of magnitude to explain.

    I'd stick to complaining about manipulation of foreign policy by neocons (we're moving in a dangerously warmongering direction as the Bannonites leave and Trump has to fill positions with neocons) and Frankfurt School Cultural Marxism (there has been a lot of real damage to Western Civ from movements such as feminism). You had a lot of good points there.

    Does the antisemitic wing of the commentariat pay *that* well?

    That is beneath you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SFG
    Oh, all right. I apologize.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. @Anonymous
    Every. Single. Time.

    ‘What.Does.It.Even.Mean?’

    bored identity’s just kiddin’.

    Actually, he is still LOL, while Waiting for Silver’s 538 & Godot to run some Serious Hate Fact Algos on Every.Single.Time.

    Good luck with that, right?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. syonredux says:
    @Dave Pinsen
    Maybe Steve was thinking more about biology/life sciences, but Jews are fairly well represented there too. Years ago, my father was impressed with the care/bedside manner of one of the attending physicians at Memorial Sloan Kettering's urgent care unit, so he asked me to look up the president of the hospital so he could write him a letter praising the attending. The MSK president then turned out to be Nobel laureate in Physiology or Medicine Harold Varmus.

    Maybe Steve was thinking more about biology/life sciences, but Jews are fairly well represented there too

    Evolutionary Theory. The big names are distressingly WASPy: RA Fisher, Sewall Wright, George Ledyard Stebbins, WD Hamilton, George Gaylord Simpson, etc

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. @SFG
    With all due respect for your very fine prior work, this is kind of silly. Does the antisemitic wing of the commentariat pay *that* well?

    There are a lot of things Jews don't do well and would envoy the goyim about, but...science? *Science*? That's about the one thing even the antisemites agree Jews are good at. Einstein may have had a lot of cockamamie left-wing ideas but he was right about science, Salk and Sabin invented the polio vaccine, Haber (and Bosch, who wasn't) invented the Haber-Bosch process that lets us make fertilizer, Paul Ehrlich made the first antibiotic for syphilis, and God knows how many others. Jews are represented at about 1,000 times expected in Nobel prizes, and if you assume 90% of that is nepotism (and I am sure some of it is), you still have two orders of magnitude to explain.

    I'd stick to complaining about manipulation of foreign policy by neocons (we're moving in a dangerously warmongering direction as the Bannonites leave and Trump has to fill positions with neocons) and Frankfurt School Cultural Marxism (there has been a lot of real damage to Western Civ from movements such as feminism). You had a lot of good points there.

    With due respect, I think you may be missing the point of Steve’s post. I believe he intends to suggest that Katz’s attack against renown Gentile scientists may be (yet another) instance of Jews acting out of ethnocentric motivations to damage the prestige/status/reputation of members of a perceived out-group (and, by extension, of the out-group itself).

    See Sabrina Rubin Erdely, Jann Wenner.

    He isn’t suggesting Jewish achievement in the sciences has been found wanting.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. @David Davenport
    The WASP / Jew ruling class is evil and it must be obliterated.

    Charles old buddy, "Pewitt" is a WASP name.

    "Charles Pewitt" is obviously not your real name.

    I'm guessing that you're a Beijing boot licker.

    What’s a Beijing boot licker?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    What’s a Beijing boot licker?
     
    What do you think it is ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Maj. Kong says:
    @Dahlia
    For real. Isn't this the greatest argument *against* multiculturalism?

    I've pointed out before the drive for reconciliation, often forgotten because of reconstruction, that drove the North to honor some of the heroes of the South as a way to heal wounds, bring their brothers back into the fold, and I've wondered recently if such a thing is possible in the future.

    I've got to believe that it is, that the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death is an artifact of our extreme cocooning-meets-huge-wealth-chasm era. But other times, I wonder if it's a pipe dream.
    Were the Northerners able to be conciliatory to Southerners because both were the Children of Albion?

    Multikult can work, it just requires an incorruptible police state like Singapore. But I don’t see any kind of LKY-like brilliance in our political elite.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. @Dmitry134564

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    If you knew anything about science or maths (which knowledge appears to be sadly lacking), you would know there were more than enough Yiddish origin names in it. However, in this case Weinstein and Katz are both anti-Israel writers, who publish on Mondoweiss, which is part of this very website - which highlights again the similarity (in this case out in the open) between the far-left and the far-right.

    You have missed Steve’s point. His post is a criticism of Jewish animus (Steve would probably describe it here as envy or greed or insecurity) with respect to perceived out-groups, especially Gentile Europeans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry134564
    Except that the people cited in the disingenuous blog here are part of this very website, writers for Mondoweiss (anti-Israel conspiracy theorists with Yiddish origin surnames, who work alongside far-right bloggers like this one, belonging to this blogger's own website). No, I did not miss the point. The point here is that the far-left and far-right are openly aligned, in the case of this very website and blog, which, reading for me, is like looking at a car-crash.

    As for people with Yiddish origin surnames, in general, anyone with knowledge of science and maths - sadly lacking here - would know they are perfectly represented amongst people with English or German (and more recently Chinese) origin surnames.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. Maj. Kong says:
    @SFG
    With all due respect for your very fine prior work, this is kind of silly. Does the antisemitic wing of the commentariat pay *that* well?

    There are a lot of things Jews don't do well and would envoy the goyim about, but...science? *Science*? That's about the one thing even the antisemites agree Jews are good at. Einstein may have had a lot of cockamamie left-wing ideas but he was right about science, Salk and Sabin invented the polio vaccine, Haber (and Bosch, who wasn't) invented the Haber-Bosch process that lets us make fertilizer, Paul Ehrlich made the first antibiotic for syphilis, and God knows how many others. Jews are represented at about 1,000 times expected in Nobel prizes, and if you assume 90% of that is nepotism (and I am sure some of it is), you still have two orders of magnitude to explain.

    I'd stick to complaining about manipulation of foreign policy by neocons (we're moving in a dangerously warmongering direction as the Bannonites leave and Trump has to fill positions with neocons) and Frankfurt School Cultural Marxism (there has been a lot of real damage to Western Civ from movements such as feminism). You had a lot of good points there.

    Franz Boas supposedly did a great deal of damage to our culture’s self-image. I have no more than a cursory interest in the natural and social sciences, but I can’t find much evidence as a layman to refute the MacDonald thesis.

    We’ve come to accept that the economic and social trends of the immediate post-WWII era might be sui generis. It might be just as much that peaceful co-existence between White Christians and Jews in the same country is following the same direction as the postwar Keynesian consensus. There are a lot more of the former, than there are of the latter. And the former gets angrier by the day, as long as significant cuts to immigration are resisted in Washington, not to mention the ongoing cultural rot of feminism and gay pride. Look at the course of my own posting history.

    I can’t stand your culture’s subversion and hypocrisy. Stop admonishing us, and start convincing your own people to disavow those like Chuck Schumer.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SFG
    I've basically ditched them, largely out of disgust for the very trends you're citing (I could never keep up with the kosher laws and would never march for social justice, and I definitely don't want to marry any of their feminist harpies), and was never raised in the culture anyway-I know no Hebrew at all and no more Yiddish than the average ex-New Yorker. I just thought the whole science thing was a little silly. I agree with most of what Steve says (and I'm not disagreeing with you about Boas, though the Frankfurt School is probably more important in terms of Western self-loathing), I just thought this was over the top.

    Anyway, what can I possibly do to make Chuck Schumer knock it off? I don't live in his state anymore, I couldn't write him a big enough check to make him shift course, and I doubt he'd listen to me anyway as the guy is very smart and probably has his precise strategy planned out. I guess I could find a temple to join and turn into the token Republican crackpot. (I don't think anyone here has any influence except for Steve, and that quite obliquely.)

    Probably I should just find a church, get a nose job, and make a joke out of any questions about my ancestry.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. eah says:
    @eah
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKHRAnFV4AEORNP.jpg

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. @Dave Pinsen
    Maybe Steve was thinking more about biology/life sciences, but Jews are fairly well represented there too. Years ago, my father was impressed with the care/bedside manner of one of the attending physicians at Memorial Sloan Kettering's urgent care unit, so he asked me to look up the president of the hospital so he could write him a letter praising the attending. The MSK president then turned out to be Nobel laureate in Physiology or Medicine Harold Varmus.

    Maybe Steve was thinking more about biology/life sciences, but Jews are fairly well represented there too.

    Steve was lampooning the historical ignorance of Katz and his ilk concerning Jew and goy alike. Jews learned in their own history are not the ones leading the mobs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. helena says:

    “all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go.”

    ha,ha, that’s me! luckily my children have a long frenchy Norman one, they might just sneak through the profiling filter.

    It never stops amazing me the precision of Steve’s observations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  126. @res
    Close, 1971: https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/ResourceMetadata/SCBBNM

    It is worth noting that he preceded that quote with: "I have formed the opinion that there is much substance to Jensen's arguments. In brief I think it likely that..."

    Hmmm, now why did Katz leave that out of the quote?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. White men are too rich and powerful. Not only should take down their statues but we should have a 70s-style supertax on rich white men like Mark Zuckerburg and Jeff Bezos.

    Ooops I meant dead conservative white men were very bad and we should take down their statues. Young, wealthy, but progressive white men like Zuckerburg are totally deserving of everything they have. What was I thinking, please don’t sack me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  128. Anon 2 says:

    Nobel Prizes don’t mean what they used to a hundred years
    ago. The heroic age of science when great discoveries were
    made by lone geniuses like Copernicus, Galileo
    or Newton mostly ended 100-150 years ago. Science is
    increasingly done by teams, and is an example of a social
    activity par excellence. In experimental particle physics
    (i.e., accelerator physics) one occasionally sees papers
    with 900+ authors. Sometimes the author list is longer
    than the paper itself. Hence it no longer makes sense to
    award Nobel Prizes to one, two, or at most three individuals.
    Generally, what is done these days is to award the prize to
    the director(s) of the team, but that person is usually the
    one who is the most aggressive, self-promoting individual,
    which may not have much to do with scientific merit. I think
    this is a good argument for either eliminating Nobel prizes
    in Science altogether or expanding them to 10,15, 20
    individuals, which of course will never be done.

    Similarly, focusing on the ethnicity of the award winner is
    a dubious undertaking. That’s probably why Feynman did not
    allow his name to be listed in a book about Jewish men and
    women of science. He was an atheist, and wanted to be regarded
    simply as an American because he grew up in the American culture,
    went to schools like Cornell and Princeton which were created
    by Christians, and, moreover, his Ph.D. adviser, John Wheeler, very famous
    man himself, who taught him a great deal, was not Jewish. If Feynman
    had been born and raised in outer Mongolia in the 1920s, and had no access
    to the richness of the U.S. science ecosystem, he probably would’ve ended up
    at best as a high school science teacher, with his song still unsung,
    and his potential completely unrealized

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    Not only Feynmann. I remember him telling me that he resented the attempts to classify him as jewish. Later I found that at least half of the "jewish" Nobel Prize winners that I met were also atheists who explicitly resented attempts by "zionists" to appropriate their reputations.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. @Dahlia
    I will forever link to the Reconciliation Quilt when this topic comes up :)

    https://youtu.be/k4rwRVuqrmo?t=22s

    It's truly a wonderful relic from a beautiful age and spirit: Slavery had been vanquished and the winners wanted to bring the losers back into the fold and declare that regardless of the absolute bloody toll, we were all Americans.

    (One day, Steve will let me do like Jody with his famous magnum opus on rock music, a report on American quilts :)

    Reconciliation Quilt, you say?

    Disclaimer: The following video is extremely un-PC, ambiguously tongue-in-cheek, and contains esoteric alt-right references and crude animation. The content therein is the sole property of its creator and does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of J.I.E. LLC

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Sarah Toga
    And as everybody knows, all evil in all of history was committed only by Whites.

    Orientals, Africans, Middle Easterners - their histories are pure sweetness and light.

    LOL! Of course not!

    But the most evil has been committed by the Albino Man.

    Those evil “coloured” tyrants who also commit much evil (living example, India’s Modi), are simply masking their inferiority complex by emulating their idols… the Albino Man.

    As for the Jihadist evil of killing innocents, they are simply taking revenge… an eye for a million eyes, and all. It is difficult to blame them much.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Opinionator
    What's a Beijing boot licker?

    What’s a Beijing boot licker?

    What do you think it is ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. @Fitzjames
    OT, Steve:

    Another aggrieved, indignant Indian, Pankaj Mishra, has panned Douglas Murray's book in NYT and LRB:

    https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n18/pankaj-mishra/what-is-great-about-ourselves

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/14/books/review/crisis-of-multiculturalism-in-europe-rita-chin-immigration.html

    Another aggrieved, indignant Indian, Pankaj Mishra

    More like Wankaj Tishra, amirite?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. biz says:
    @27 year old
    Hello fellow White people...

    Irony alert though: Yarden Katz’s primary gig is writing for Mondoweiss, a tedious anti-Israel website which is on Steve’s and Unz’s blogroll.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Realist says:
    @europeasant
    “more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”, which “will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment”.

    That seems about right.

    ““more than half of the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons”, which “will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment”.”

    Yes , more than half. Eighty per cent or more.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Mr. Anon says:

    It is clear that a white spirit has taken over science.

    We must denounce white science, in all it’s forms.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  136. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @Thirdeye
    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable. It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity. All races could benefit from eugenics. Subconscious eugenic sense normally figures into sexual attraction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Dave Pinsen says: • Website

    In the event no one has made this point yet, this is another example of Trump being right. He said after Charlottesville that taking down Confederate monuments was only the beginning.

    Another thing he was proved right about this week (again) is the danger of welcoming refugees from Syria and other Muslim countries. It turns out that one of the perpetrators of the recent Tube bombing in London was a Syrian refugee.

    Trump is mocked for not reading much, but that’s probably why he gets issues like these right: his innate common sense hasn’t been clouded by politically correct books. It takes in-person lectures by 4-star generals and former Goldman Sachs executives to get Trump to see the emperor’s invisible clothes.

    Read More
    • Agree: Desiderius
    • Replies: @Malcolm X-Lax
    Trump had also been right when the media was ordering him to denounce the bomb threats against all those jewish community centers and Trump they might not be what they seem.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. @Tyrion
    Steve, the guy is a loser.

    He is certainly no pro-Jewish advocate. He is no hypocrite as you imply. Just an all round idiot.

    Here is another quote of his:

    "If we only dare look (at Israel), we see that there’s apartheid and much more."

    Time to take JEWS off their pedestals as being perpetually oppressed, ” chosen”, and oh so much better than everyone else!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. jackson says:

    Berkeley’s gay Jewish anthropologist Paul Rabinow was so bothered that PCR, the seminal invention in biotech since the advent of molecular cloning, had been invented by Kary Mullis – a WASPy surfer dude from the South – that he wrote a lengthy book attempting to show that Mullis really can’t take all the credit given to him for the invention, cause, you know, the Rashomon effect.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  140. @Thirdeye
    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable. It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity. All races could benefit from eugenics. Subconscious eugenic sense normally figures into sexual attraction.

    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable.

    It still is.

    It’s just that the unscrupulous found it profitable to pretend otherwise. Over time so profitable that now they can wantonly inflict that pretense on the rest of us with little repercussion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thirdeye
    Still common sense, suppressed from the mainstream.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. SFG says:
    @Maj. Kong
    Franz Boas supposedly did a great deal of damage to our culture's self-image. I have no more than a cursory interest in the natural and social sciences, but I can't find much evidence as a layman to refute the MacDonald thesis.

    We've come to accept that the economic and social trends of the immediate post-WWII era might be sui generis. It might be just as much that peaceful co-existence between White Christians and Jews in the same country is following the same direction as the postwar Keynesian consensus. There are a lot more of the former, than there are of the latter. And the former gets angrier by the day, as long as significant cuts to immigration are resisted in Washington, not to mention the ongoing cultural rot of feminism and gay pride. Look at the course of my own posting history.

    I can't stand your culture's subversion and hypocrisy. Stop admonishing us, and start convincing your own people to disavow those like Chuck Schumer.

    I’ve basically ditched them, largely out of disgust for the very trends you’re citing (I could never keep up with the kosher laws and would never march for social justice, and I definitely don’t want to marry any of their feminist harpies), and was never raised in the culture anyway-I know no Hebrew at all and no more Yiddish than the average ex-New Yorker. I just thought the whole science thing was a little silly. I agree with most of what Steve says (and I’m not disagreeing with you about Boas, though the Frankfurt School is probably more important in terms of Western self-loathing), I just thought this was over the top.

    Anyway, what can I possibly do to make Chuck Schumer knock it off? I don’t live in his state anymore, I couldn’t write him a big enough check to make him shift course, and I doubt he’d listen to me anyway as the guy is very smart and probably has his precise strategy planned out. I guess I could find a temple to join and turn into the token Republican crackpot. (I don’t think anyone here has any influence except for Steve, and that quite obliquely.)

    Probably I should just find a church, get a nose job, and make a joke out of any questions about my ancestry.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. SFG says:
    @Desiderius

    Does the antisemitic wing of the commentariat pay *that* well?
     
    That is beneath you.

    Oh, all right. I apologize.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    That's manly of you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. AM says:
    @Judah Benjamin Hur
    Keep in mind the Daily Stormer market is up for grabs.

    Keep in mind the Daily Stormer market is up for grabs.

    Seriously? It’s totally okay for Jewish people, of a clear, distinct ethnic origin to bash white people. They can make a living at in public and get respect for it. Meanwhile, the tattooed carnie section of Jewish paranoia gets chased to Iceland, because it’s We All Agree That It’s Terrible (TM).

    The double standard and the whining gets very, very old. You’re not a victim if it’s not okay to bash Jews. It’s the other way around.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion

    Seriously? It’s totally okay for Jewish people, of a clear, distinct ethnic origin to bash white people. They can make a living at in public and get respect for it. Meanwhile, the tattooed carnie section of Jewish paranoia gets chased to Iceland, because it’s We All Agree That It’s Terrible (TM).

    The double standard and the whining gets very, very old. You’re not a victim if it’s not okay to bash Jews. It’s the other way around.
     

    A. It is totally OK for everyone to bash white people including Jews as white people.

    B. It is totally not OK for non-Jewish whites to bash Jews.

    C. It is totally not OK for Jewish whites to bash white gentiles.

    None of this is contradictory...

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. @anonymous
    Jewish architects ... do you really want to go there? Not so pretty.

    “So true”, as Trump says. The work of Jewish architects are one of the strongest arguments for Zionism that I know of. When the people who smash things are given money to build things, they create destructive buildings.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Have Zionists created destructive buildings?
    , @Cagey Beast
    Do the West Bank settlements count?

    No, you're missing my point. With Zionism, at least Jewish architects are building for people they want to uplift, rather than tear down. They can only use architecture as a form of collective punishment and critique when there are Gentiles there to endure it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. Tyrion says:
    @Altai
    He is intellectually honest then, but his angst against the 'great white men' is not introspective either. Critical theory is still critical theory and still seeks to tear down or undermine any sense of cohesive identity in Western nations because it makes some people feel unsafe.

    Critical theory is still critical theory and still seeks to tear down or undermine any sense of cohesive identity in Western nations because it makes some people feel unsafe.

    One of those Western nations is Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Neither the Zionist entity nor the construct "the Jewish People" are among the usual targets of critical theory.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. grapesoda says:
    @Thirdeye
    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable. It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity. All races could benefit from eugenics. Subconscious eugenic sense normally figures into sexual attraction.

    Eugenics is mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita:

    “When irreligion is prominent in the family, the women of the family become corrupt, and from the degradation of womanhood, O descendant of Vrsni, comes unwanted progeny. When there is increase of unwanted population, a hellish situation is created both for the family and for those who destroy the family tradition.” Bg 1.40-41

    This knowledge has been around for a long time and is easily observable. It didn’t require the discovery of genetics as we know it in the modern sense.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    What did BG mean by this?
    , @Thirdeye
    That passage addresses family dysfunction, not eugenics.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. grapesoda says:
    @Thirdeye
    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable. It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity. All races could benefit from eugenics. Subconscious eugenic sense normally figures into sexual attraction.

    It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity.

    Also because it conflicts with pretty lies that people either want to sell (the sociopaths) or desperately want to believe because they sound all nice (the useful idiots).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. Tyrion says:
    @bartok
    Psychoanalysis is a great example of a scientific fad/fraud driven by Jews.
    Climate change is the current example - isn't it weird that its 'discoveries' originated at Penn State and East Anglia, not at Caltech and Cambridge?

    Psychoanalysis is a great example of a scientific fad/fraud driven by Jews.

    The throwaway arrogance of the ignorant. If you’d read Freud you’d probably like him. He was a realist and his work is thoroughly unprogressive.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Thirdeye
    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable. It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity. All races could benefit from eugenics. Subconscious eugenic sense normally figures into sexual attraction.

    The increasing distance of the average humans from animals and nature in general is promoting increasingly wild fictional ideas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Interesting. I've had a similar thought, but hadn't stated it in such general terms.
    , @Jack D
    This is true. The English country gentry (Darwin and his crowd) had a strong and person interest in and contact with animal breeding which they generalized into their understanding of the world. Proper animal and plant breeding not only won horse races but it influenced the prosperity of your farm. It was well understood that civilized man had to carefully control this process and not just let nature take its course or else you would be back at the African village level of "prosperity".

    Today's feminist picks out a cat at the shelter and that is the extent of her contact with the animal world.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Used to be men (and women) of science pursued the truth. Therefore, when their data spat out hatefacts, these were looked at objectively, and conclusions were drawn like genetic differences in IQ between groups. Much in the same way James Damore was too borderline autistic to realize his faux pas, previous generations of social scientists accepted their results for what they were, and acted accordingly.

    Now, when everything is politics, it is realized that science can be used to support The Narrative. It is no longer objective, and books like Testosterone Rex win awards, even after being thoroughly rebuked and dismantled.

    OT: What intelligent kid has never theorized about eugenics for the stupid with his friends at school? Now every great thinker from the 19th and 20th century who even thought about it is being dragged through the mud for what used to be quite openly discussed.

    Read More
    • Agree: Peter Johnson
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  151. Svigor says:

    I’m puzzled why the term “anti-Semite” is used to mean “anti-Jew.”

    “Semite” includes many non-Jewish peoples. “Anti-Jew” is narrower and clearer.

    Some Jew coined “antisemite” as the word and it stuck.

    The “the hard-hearted drive to beat our opponents to death” is due entirely to the Left’s insistence that this be a death match

    PRECISELY. I don’t usually go in for that sort of thing, but the left finally convinced me.

    I can’t stand your culture’s subversion and hypocrisy. Stop admonishing us, and start convincing your own people to disavow those like Chuck Schumer.

    I tell alt-right Jews that, and they say (not that SFG is right-wing, but you know what I’m getting at):

    I’ve basically ditched them, largely out of disgust for the very trends you’re citing

    And I say hey, great for us that you ditched them, and are now policing us on their behalf.

    I just thought this was over the top.

    Maybe that’s the problem; Jews’ definition of “over the top” needs extensive reworking. Maybe ask yourselves, “how much shit did Susan Sontag get from Jews for calling the White Race ‘the cancer of history’” before proceeding?

    Anyway, what can I possibly do to make Chuck Schumer knock it off?

    Go bug him on Twitter. You bug Steve on iSteve, right? For far lesser offenses?

    Irony alert though: Yarden Katz’s primary gig is writing for Mondoweiss, a tedious anti-Israel website which is on Steve’s and Unz’s blogroll.

    Jews’ hectoring of Whites (all 800 lbs of it) is never tedious. All crit of Israel (all 5 oz) is tedious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  152. Tyrion says:
    @Svigor
    "White Supremacy" means "majority white," "historically white," etc. When read that way the term makes a lot more sense, as used.

    Steve, the guy is a loser.

    He is certainly no pro-Jewish advocate. He is no hypocrite as you imply. Just an all round idiot.

    Here is another quote of his:

    “If we only dare look (at Israel), we see that there’s apartheid and much more.”
     
    Like most Jews and part-Jews, he's almost certainly insufficiently anti-Zionist to have any credibility at all. Which is, I'm guessing, why you quoted a sentence, rather than linked a piece; because he has no anti-Zionist piece.

    Even if he had an anti-Zionist piece to link, it would be a matter of devoting equal attention to the mote in white eyes, and the beam in Jewish eyes, which would still be totally out of proportion. So, yes, he probably displays an obvious pro-Jewish bias.

    Not that the same thing isn't baked into the zeitgeist itself (largely by people like Katz and Weinstein in the face of practically zero countervailing effort), mind you.

    He is intellectually honest then, but his angst against the ‘great white men’ is not introspective either. Critical theory is still critical theory and still seeks to tear down or undermine any sense of cohesive identity in Western nations because it makes some people feel unsafe.
     
    Nonsense. He's not intellectually honest. Real social triage would be writing pieces about the mountain of western racism, Zionism and Israel, and ignoring (or giving sentences to) the molehill of "White Supremacy." He's done the opposite, AFAICT.

    (Yes I know that Jews can’t be anti-Jew, just like I know that Whites can’t be anti-White, Americans can’t be anti-American, Russians can’t be anti-Russians, Heterosexuals can’t be anti-heterosexual…)
     
    There are anti-Jewish Jews, they're just vanishingly rare, relative to anti-White whites. Similarly, pro-Jewish Jews are abundant, relative to pro-White Whites. The two groups' overall attitudes toward both are roughly opposite as well. And the whole picture serves pro-Jewish interests, and works against pro-White interests.

    Doesn’t anybody have this internet thingee?

    Katz writes for Mondoweiss:
     
    Much better. Now we have 7 pieces that criticize Israeli treatment of Palestinians, to accompany the piece that criticizes White Supremacy (I'm guessing it's actually "pieces," and Steve has not linked to his only anti-White piece).

    But if Katz follows the familiar pattern, he centers his criticism on the Israel/Palestine issue, and largely ignores the issue of Jewish White Supremacy.

    On balance I'll give Katz the benefit of the doubt and call him one of the least bad offenders out there, but he's still bad; even equal treatment of White Supremacy and Jewish White Supremacy is awful, and I'm guessing Katz doesn't even get there (nobody ever does).

    Don’t you feel embarrassed litigating the difference between how anti-Jewish and how more generally anti-white some zealot of progressivism is?

    Also, I only put in one sentence because my point only needed one sentence. Just like yours would have been accurately put across by “Jews make me feel like Whites makes Blacks feel, so where’s my social veneration of imagined victimhood?”

    Is there anything less impressive than someone desperately seeking fantasy victim status?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. Thirdeye says:
    @Desiderius

    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable.
     
    It still is.

    It's just that the unscrupulous found it profitable to pretend otherwise. Over time so profitable that now they can wantonly inflict that pretense on the rest of us with little repercussion.

    Still common sense, suppressed from the mainstream.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. @Opinionator
    You have missed Steve's point. His post is a criticism of Jewish animus (Steve would probably describe it here as envy or greed or insecurity) with respect to perceived out-groups, especially Gentile Europeans.

    Except that the people cited in the disingenuous blog here are part of this very website, writers for Mondoweiss (anti-Israel conspiracy theorists with Yiddish origin surnames, who work alongside far-right bloggers like this one, belonging to this blogger’s own website). No, I did not miss the point. The point here is that the far-left and far-right are openly aligned, in the case of this very website and blog, which, reading for me, is like looking at a car-crash.

    As for people with Yiddish origin surnames, in general, anyone with knowledge of science and maths – sadly lacking here – would know they are perfectly represented amongst people with English or German (and more recently Chinese) origin surnames.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    As for people with Yiddish origin surnames, in general, anyone with knowledge of science and maths – sadly lacking here – would know they are perfectly represented amongst people with English or German (and more recently Chinese) origin surnames.

    Again, you are missing the point. No one here would dispute the proposition that Jews are well represented in science and math. (Lurk moar.). Rather, Katz's article is part of a perceived pattern of Jews attacking or minimizing the accomplishments and culture of the European people.

    See Sabrina Ruben Erdely, Jann Wenner, Donna Zuckerberg.
    , @3g4me
    @152 Dmitri:

    Congratulations! You have just come from behind and pulled off a stunning upset to take first place in the Jewish victimhood and utter lack of self awareness prize! Great work!

    (And kudos to Jack D for neither responding to nor repeating your oy vey miasma.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. hyperbola says:
    @Anon 2
    Nobel Prizes don't mean what they used to a hundred years
    ago. The heroic age of science when great discoveries were
    made by lone geniuses like Copernicus, Galileo
    or Newton mostly ended 100-150 years ago. Science is
    increasingly done by teams, and is an example of a social
    activity par excellence. In experimental particle physics
    (i.e., accelerator physics) one occasionally sees papers
    with 900+ authors. Sometimes the author list is longer
    than the paper itself. Hence it no longer makes sense to
    award Nobel Prizes to one, two, or at most three individuals.
    Generally, what is done these days is to award the prize to
    the director(s) of the team, but that person is usually the
    one who is the most aggressive, self-promoting individual,
    which may not have much to do with scientific merit. I think
    this is a good argument for either eliminating Nobel prizes
    in Science altogether or expanding them to 10,15, 20
    individuals, which of course will never be done.

    Similarly, focusing on the ethnicity of the award winner is
    a dubious undertaking. That's probably why Feynman did not
    allow his name to be listed in a book about Jewish men and
    women of science. He was an atheist, and wanted to be regarded
    simply as an American because he grew up in the American culture,
    went to schools like Cornell and Princeton which were created
    by Christians, and, moreover, his Ph.D. adviser, John Wheeler, very famous
    man himself, who taught him a great deal, was not Jewish. If Feynman
    had been born and raised in outer Mongolia in the 1920s, and had no access
    to the richness of the U.S. science ecosystem, he probably would've ended up
    at best as a high school science teacher, with his song still unsung,
    and his potential completely unrealized

    Not only Feynmann. I remember him telling me that he resented the attempts to classify him as jewish. Later I found that at least half of the “jewish” Nobel Prize winners that I met were also atheists who explicitly resented attempts by “zionists” to appropriate their reputations.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Do you also remember Feynman telling you that his name was spelled with one n in the Jewish fashion and not with 2 in the German way?

    To be honest, while there are some exceptions, there are not a lot of Nobel Prize winners coming out of yeshivas (or madrasas or convent schools). Science is a mostly secular pursuit undertaken by most assimilated people. In the early part of the 20th century, being assimilated often meant being converted to Christianity and later it mean being atheist. Jews win Nobel Prizes out of proportion to their numbers not due to their attendance at religious services but because they come from one of the few groups in human history who have been subject to an accidental millennium scale IQ enhancing eugenics program of which Feynman was the beneficiary whether he liked it or not. You could take Feynman out of the synagogue but you couldn't take the synagogue out of Feynman.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. biz says:

    Steve if you really oppose this kind of intersectional gobbledeegook garbage, you could take Mondoweiss, Yarden Katz’s primary writing outlet, off of your recommended “alternate media” reading list that always appears on the right hand side of the page.

    Or do you oppose it with a wink and a nod?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  157. biz says:
    @Vinteuil
    Lot - Sailer may be Giraldi's co-blogger, but you can't blame him for every crazy thing Giraldi writes.

    The whole point of this website, as I understand it, is to let a thousand flowers bloom.

    I was hoping for that too, but if that was really the case, you’d think somewhere in those thousand flowers could be one that has something nuanced to say about Israel and/or is generally positive on Jewish contributions to America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Mercer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. biz says:
    @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    I wonder if Mr. (((Katz))) favors removing Albert Einstein and Jonas Salk from their pedestals?

    I wonder if Mr. (((Katz))) favors removing Albert Einstein and Jonas Salk from their pedestals?

    Yes he probably does, because, for the millionth time, Yarden Katz writes for the virulently and tediously anti-Israel Mondoweiss blog.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    Sorry to see you go. I, for one, agree about the tediousness.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AM

    Sorry to see you go. I, for one, agree about the tediousness.
     
    Y'all need to go the Daily Stormer (now in Iceland) and click some articles. This was nothing.

    Mr. Sailer made a joke that would have made it into Spaceballs.

    I too, am sick of the JQ, but the Jews aren't and the media in general is happy to do a white pile-on, which Jews of prominence hardly seem to notice.

    I'm sorry Lot was frustrated, but guess what, there are a lot of us tired of not even being able to turn on a TV without seeing something anti-white or just plain offensive. Good God, I was just at the gas station and ended up watching a news report about Taylor Swift's new outfit, which basically looked like lingere. All I wanted to do was fill up my gas tank. Argh...

    All Lot has do to is pick any media outlet that's not been regulated to the dank corners of badthink. I'm surrounded.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. @SFG
    Oh, all right. I apologize.

    That’s manly of you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. @David Davenport
    The WASP / Jew ruling class is evil and it must be obliterated.

    Charles old buddy, "Pewitt" is a WASP name.

    "Charles Pewitt" is obviously not your real name.

    I'm guessing that you're a Beijing boot licker.

    David Davenport says:

    Charles old buddy, “Pewitt” is a WASP name.

    I say:

    I am a Euro-mongrel with some English ancestry, I in no way identify or qualify for what would be considered as a “WASP.” I narrowly define WASP to mean the Northern ruling class at the time when the the United States transformed into an Empire, 1890 or thereabouts, about the time the US Census declared the frontier to be closed. I would also add that to me, WASPs are part of the New England continuum from Portland to Portland. I don’t consider Anglo-Norman George Washington to be a WASP; nor do I think the Scotch-Irish Andrew Jackson is a WASP.

    I would suggest that when the snot-nosed skanks go on and on about WASPs they are not just talking about every bastard with English ancestry.

    I would say the Bush family are WASPs, but they have other blood from Europe as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. @anonymous-antimarxist
    Yarden Katz is not just any Jewish Harvard Professor.

    https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/ykatz

    Yarden Katz is a departmental fellow in Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School. His scientific interests are at the interface of artificial intelligence and biology. At Berkman Klein, he is working on understanding the politics and culture of biomedical science. He is particularly interested in how scientific projects are influenced by fields thought to be external to science, like journalism and economics. What questions are prioritized, and which directions get sidelined, by seemingly “non-scientific” considerations? How do these external factors affect the building of a “commons” in biomedical science - and what can biomedical science learn from the software world about commons-building? He will focus on how privatization and the machinery of "intellectual property" law change the practice of academic biomedical research.
     
    Remember James Damore was working on his PH.D in Systems Biology at Harvard when he left for Google.

    Maybe knowing that Katz would be inspecting his thesis for anything politically incorrect was why Damore left Harvard for an elite programmer job Google in the first place?

    Oh well out of the frying pan and into the fire.

    No Place for White Men!!!

    I would not be surprised in the least to find out that Harvard Katz was known to James Damore of Google fame, and that Damore escaped Harvard because the Katz types were getting on his nerves.

    Katz is perhaps pushing things too far in terms of attacking Whitey, he may not like the results of his efforts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. ussr andy says:
    @DriesNK
    Mask slipped off again.

    Mask slipped off again.

    yes, Katz’s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. @Thirdeye
    Eugenics used to be a mainstream, common sense follow-on to the recognition that not all heritable traits are desirable. It became rejected not for any intrinsic lack of merit but because it became conflated with ideology that fostered crimes against humanity. All races could benefit from eugenics. Subconscious eugenic sense normally figures into sexual attraction.

    From Richard Dawkins’ The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution:

    Political opposition to eugenic breeding of humans sometimes spills over into the almost certainly false assertion that it is impossible. Not only is it immoral, you may hear it said, it wouldn’t work. Unfortunately, to say that something is morally wrong, or politically undesirable, is not to say that it wouldn’t work. I have no doubt that, if you set your mind to it and had enough time and enough political power, you could breed a race of superior body-builders, or high-jumpers, or shot-putters; pearl fishers, sumo wrestlers, or sprinters; or (I suspect, although now with less confidence because there are no animal precedents) superior musicians, poets, mathematicians or wine-tasters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thirdeye
    Dawkins is talking about positive eugenics, which would be a questionable enterprise. Negative eugenics is about stopping maladaptive traits (which might also inadvertently show up as a side effect of positive eugenics). But if the circumstances under which child-bearing is permissible were regulated (e.g. completion of high school or G.E.D., not on welfare, no recent pattern of criminal behavior, mentally competent functioning adult.....) it would probably exclude people with genetically-based inabilities as well as garden-variety fuckups.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Kylie says:

    Right. Let’s take the “great” white men of science off their pedestals and replace them with statues of this great* white woman artist–who is also differently-abled!

    https://goo.gl/images/Jk4nL6

    *omit sneer quotes

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  166. @Dmitry134564
    Except that the people cited in the disingenuous blog here are part of this very website, writers for Mondoweiss (anti-Israel conspiracy theorists with Yiddish origin surnames, who work alongside far-right bloggers like this one, belonging to this blogger's own website). No, I did not miss the point. The point here is that the far-left and far-right are openly aligned, in the case of this very website and blog, which, reading for me, is like looking at a car-crash.

    As for people with Yiddish origin surnames, in general, anyone with knowledge of science and maths - sadly lacking here - would know they are perfectly represented amongst people with English or German (and more recently Chinese) origin surnames.

    As for people with Yiddish origin surnames, in general, anyone with knowledge of science and maths – sadly lacking here – would know they are perfectly represented amongst people with English or German (and more recently Chinese) origin surnames.

    Again, you are missing the point. No one here would dispute the proposition that Jews are well represented in science and math. (Lurk moar.). Rather, Katz’s article is part of a perceived pattern of Jews attacking or minimizing the accomplishments and culture of the European people.

    See Sabrina Ruben Erdely, Jann Wenner, Donna Zuckerberg.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. @Daniel Chieh
    The increasing distance of the average humans from animals and nature in general is promoting increasingly wild fictional ideas.

    Interesting. I’ve had a similar thought, but hadn’t stated it in such general terms.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. @grapesoda
    Eugenics is mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita:

    "When irreligion is prominent in the family, the women of the family become corrupt, and from the degradation of womanhood, O descendant of Vrsni, comes unwanted progeny. When there is increase of unwanted population, a hellish situation is created both for the family and for those who destroy the family tradition." Bg 1.40-41

    This knowledge has been around for a long time and is easily observable. It didn't require the discovery of genetics as we know it in the modern sense.

    What did BG mean by this?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. @Cagey Beast
    "So true", as Trump says. The work of Jewish architects are one of the strongest arguments for Zionism that I know of. When the people who smash things are given money to build things, they create destructive buildings.

    Have Zionists created destructive buildings?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. biz says:
    @Lot

    Trump … Crick … all these repulsive five-letter Protestant surnames, they all have to go. Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    You've become tiresome with this. And you now have your co-blogger saying


    the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.”
     
    Peace out.

    I agree its tiresome, and for a person whose trademark is noticing things, Steve doesn’t do much noticing that most of the leftist Jews that he pillories are actually anti-Israel and not very pro-Jewish. This Katz fellow is a writer at Mondoweiss, which surely Steve is aware of since it is highlighted in his alternate media selections.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Opposing certain of Israel's policies (such as its cannibalization of the West Bank) is not the same thing as being anti-Israel.

    I doubt you can name even five recognizable Americans who are Jewish and oppose the existence of a "Jewish state" in Palestine. Thus, any person who believes he is Jewish and whom Steve mentions in a post is almost certainly not anti-Israel.
    , @Anon
    Geez. Does everybody have to do the censor-and-disavow thing?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. @Tyrion

    Critical theory is still critical theory and still seeks to tear down or undermine any sense of cohesive identity in Western nations because it makes some people feel unsafe.
     
    One of those Western nations is Israel.

    Neither the Zionist entity nor the construct “the Jewish People” are among the usual targets of critical theory.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion
    Israel gets plenty of stick. The Jews there are hated by much of the Western media for the crime of not agreeing to lay down and die, or at least leave and be dispossessed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. RonaldB says:
    @anonymous-antimarxist
    Yarden Katz is not just any Jewish Harvard Professor.

    https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/ykatz

    Yarden Katz is a departmental fellow in Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School. His scientific interests are at the interface of artificial intelligence and biology. At Berkman Klein, he is working on understanding the politics and culture of biomedical science. He is particularly interested in how scientific projects are influenced by fields thought to be external to science, like journalism and economics. What questions are prioritized, and which directions get sidelined, by seemingly “non-scientific” considerations? How do these external factors affect the building of a “commons” in biomedical science - and what can biomedical science learn from the software world about commons-building? He will focus on how privatization and the machinery of "intellectual property" law change the practice of academic biomedical research.
     
    Remember James Damore was working on his PH.D in Systems Biology at Harvard when he left for Google.

    Maybe knowing that Katz would be inspecting his thesis for anything politically incorrect was why Damore left Harvard for an elite programmer job Google in the first place?

    Oh well out of the frying pan and into the fire.

    No Place for White Men!!!

    “He studied philosophy and artificial intelligence as an undergraduate at the University of Maryland and received his PhD in Brain and Cognitive Sciences from MIT.”

    Katz has impressive credentials. But, a degree in artificial intelligence and a PhD in Cognitive Sciences from MIT implies a very sharp cookie completely familiar with mathematics and neurology.

    And yet, Katz completely focuses on the political side of science, which is not really science at all, but pop sociology. So, has Katz chucked his original scholastic efforts? Or, did his technical work consistently not cut the mustard, and he found the path to tenure and academic prominence through the “softer” routes of writing about the influence of racism and privilege on the development of science? His politicized talk certainly does not fit the profile of the technical person interested in problems of nature.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    He has hardly any scientific pubs. At his stage (a postdoc) that does not bode for for a career in science (i.e.,getting a tenure-track faculty position), which is probably why he's going into political writing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. @Cagey Beast
    "So true", as Trump says. The work of Jewish architects are one of the strongest arguments for Zionism that I know of. When the people who smash things are given money to build things, they create destructive buildings.

    Do the West Bank settlements count?

    No, you’re missing my point. With Zionism, at least Jewish architects are building for people they want to uplift, rather than tear down. They can only use architecture as a form of collective punishment and critique when there are Gentiles there to endure it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. mobi says:

    C’mon, (((y’all))) can do better!

    Spice it up a little.

    Where’s the ‘vile’, the ‘vomit’, the ‘spewing’, ‘ranting’, ‘despicable’, ‘toxic’ ‘noxious’, ‘venomous’, ‘virulent’ we’ve so come to expect and adore?

    You hardly even get our attention anymore without at least a little shrieking and spitting

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  175. AM says:
    @Chrisnonymous
    Sorry to see you go. I, for one, agree about the tediousness.

    Sorry to see you go. I, for one, agree about the tediousness.

    Y’all need to go the Daily Stormer (now in Iceland) and click some articles. This was nothing.

    Mr. Sailer made a joke that would have made it into Spaceballs.

    I too, am sick of the JQ, but the Jews aren’t and the media in general is happy to do a white pile-on, which Jews of prominence hardly seem to notice.

    I’m sorry Lot was frustrated, but guess what, there are a lot of us tired of not even being able to turn on a TV without seeing something anti-white or just plain offensive. Good God, I was just at the gas station and ended up watching a news report about Taylor Swift’s new outfit, which basically looked like lingere. All I wanted to do was fill up my gas tank. Argh…

    All Lot has do to is pick any media outlet that’s not been regulated to the dank corners of badthink. I’m surrounded.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. Jack D says:
    @hyperbola
    Not only Feynmann. I remember him telling me that he resented the attempts to classify him as jewish. Later I found that at least half of the "jewish" Nobel Prize winners that I met were also atheists who explicitly resented attempts by "zionists" to appropriate their reputations.

    Do you also remember Feynman telling you that his name was spelled with one n in the Jewish fashion and not with 2 in the German way?

    To be honest, while there are some exceptions, there are not a lot of Nobel Prize winners coming out of yeshivas (or madrasas or convent schools). Science is a mostly secular pursuit undertaken by most assimilated people. In the early part of the 20th century, being assimilated often meant being converted to Christianity and later it mean being atheist. Jews win Nobel Prizes out of proportion to their numbers not due to their attendance at religious services but because they come from one of the few groups in human history who have been subject to an accidental millennium scale IQ enhancing eugenics program of which Feynman was the beneficiary whether he liked it or not. You could take Feynman out of the synagogue but you couldn’t take the synagogue out of Feynman.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. Jack D says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    The increasing distance of the average humans from animals and nature in general is promoting increasingly wild fictional ideas.

    This is true. The English country gentry (Darwin and his crowd) had a strong and person interest in and contact with animal breeding which they generalized into their understanding of the world. Proper animal and plant breeding not only won horse races but it influenced the prosperity of your farm. It was well understood that civilized man had to carefully control this process and not just let nature take its course or else you would be back at the African village level of “prosperity”.

    Today’s feminist picks out a cat at the shelter and that is the extent of her contact with the animal world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    A cat as sterile and incapable of surviving in the wild as she is.
    , @Anon

    convent schools
     
    Maybe not Nobel prizes, but:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Caselli
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocenzo_Manzetti
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelista_Torricelli
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fausto_Veranzio
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guido_of_Arezzo

    If you count the University of Bologna there's also Marconi (and others).

    after about 5 minutes on wikipedia.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. 3g4me says:
    @Dmitry134564
    Except that the people cited in the disingenuous blog here are part of this very website, writers for Mondoweiss (anti-Israel conspiracy theorists with Yiddish origin surnames, who work alongside far-right bloggers like this one, belonging to this blogger's own website). No, I did not miss the point. The point here is that the far-left and far-right are openly aligned, in the case of this very website and blog, which, reading for me, is like looking at a car-crash.

    As for people with Yiddish origin surnames, in general, anyone with knowledge of science and maths - sadly lacking here - would know they are perfectly represented amongst people with English or German (and more recently Chinese) origin surnames.

    @152 Dmitri:

    Congratulations! You have just come from behind and pulled off a stunning upset to take first place in the Jewish victimhood and utter lack of self awareness prize! Great work!

    (And kudos to Jack D for neither responding to nor repeating your oy vey miasma.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. Tyrion says:
    @AM

    Keep in mind the Daily Stormer market is up for grabs.
     
    Seriously? It's totally okay for Jewish people, of a clear, distinct ethnic origin to bash white people. They can make a living at in public and get respect for it. Meanwhile, the tattooed carnie section of Jewish paranoia gets chased to Iceland, because it's We All Agree That It's Terrible (TM).

    The double standard and the whining gets very, very old. You're not a victim if it's not okay to bash Jews. It's the other way around.

    Seriously? It’s totally okay for Jewish people, of a clear, distinct ethnic origin to bash white people. They can make a living at in public and get respect for it. Meanwhile, the tattooed carnie section of Jewish paranoia gets chased to Iceland, because it’s We All Agree That It’s Terrible (TM).

    The double standard and the whining gets very, very old. You’re not a victim if it’s not okay to bash Jews. It’s the other way around.

    A. It is totally OK for everyone to bash white people including Jews as white people.

    B. It is totally not OK for non-Jewish whites to bash Jews.

    C. It is totally not OK for Jewish whites to bash white gentiles.

    None of this is contradictory…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. @Jack D
    This is true. The English country gentry (Darwin and his crowd) had a strong and person interest in and contact with animal breeding which they generalized into their understanding of the world. Proper animal and plant breeding not only won horse races but it influenced the prosperity of your farm. It was well understood that civilized man had to carefully control this process and not just let nature take its course or else you would be back at the African village level of "prosperity".

    Today's feminist picks out a cat at the shelter and that is the extent of her contact with the animal world.

    A cat as sterile and incapable of surviving in the wild as she is.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @biz
    I was hoping for that too, but if that was really the case, you'd think somewhere in those thousand flowers could be one that has something nuanced to say about Israel and/or is generally positive on Jewish contributions to America.

    Mercer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. ogunsiron says:

    Douglas Rushkoff, author of “Nothing Sacred” explains:

    “The thing that makes judaism dangerous to everybody – to every race, to every nation, to every idea – is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people, these are all artificial constructions and judaism really teaches us how to see that.

    “In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real, and that’s very upsetting to people.”

    —-

    This often translates into the erasing zeal on display these days. This need to bring other nation down. To befoul their heroes and gods and to mock everything they hold dear.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    “The thing that makes judaism dangerous to everybody – to every race, to every nation, to every idea – is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people, these are all artificial constructions and judaism really teaches us how to see that."

    This level of hypocrisy is simply beyond most Gentiles' power of imagination.

    "We don't believe in the boundaries of nation states"--except for our nation state Israel.

    "We don't believe in gods that protect individual groups of people"--except for the G-d of the chosen people.
    , @ben tillman

    “In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real, and that’s very upsetting to people.”
     
    That sounds a lot like hie co-ethnic Michael Ledeen:


    Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. ogunsiron says:
    @Tyrion
    Steve, the guy is a loser.

    He is certainly no pro-Jewish advocate. He is no hypocrite as you imply. Just an all round idiot.

    Here is another quote of his:

    "If we only dare look (at Israel), we see that there’s apartheid and much more."

    So ? He’s one of those jews who hate israel because it doesn’t live up to his idea of the jewish ideal. he’s the kind of jew who hates Israel because in israel they do goyisch stuff like having an army, being patriots, promoting large families etc. He’s one of those jews who thinks that it’s supremely jewish to hate israel, because israel is too damn goyish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion

    So ? He’s one of those jews who hate israel because it doesn’t live up to his idea of the jewish ideal. he’s the kind of jew who hates Israel because in israel they do goyisch stuff like having an army, being patriots, promoting large families etc. He’s one of those jews who thinks that it’s supremely jewish to hate israel, because israel is too damn goyish.
     
    Once you are reduced to claiming that a Western probably atheist and self-hating Jew hates Israel because it is not Jewish enough, you are entirely self-defeated.

    Replace Jewish with Katz's real religion of Progressivism or Rousseaunism or slave morality or pathetic dweebishness and you will be much more accurate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. ogunsiron says:
    @Altai
    Yarden Katz. Yarden, really? Can they not even scare up a John Smith to write these things? At least get somebody whose given name isn't a modern Hebrew one.

    How old is this guy ? He’s of a generation when ((( they ))) felt they didn’t need to hide behind names like Harvey, Sheldon, etc. He seems a Max Blumenthal type. The kind of jew whose dedication to the abolition of nations is total.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. @Tyrion
    Steve, the guy is a loser.

    He is certainly no pro-Jewish advocate. He is no hypocrite as you imply. Just an all round idiot.

    Here is another quote of his:

    "If we only dare look (at Israel), we see that there’s apartheid and much more."

    Is he anti-Zionist or does he merely oppose some of Israel’s “policies,” such as its invasion and colonization of the West Bank?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion

    Is he anti-Zionist or does he merely oppose some of Israel’s “policies,” such as its invasion and colonization of the West Bank?
     
    Is Black Lives Matter anti-white or merely anti racism and police brutality?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @ogunsiron
    Douglas Rushkoff, author of "Nothing Sacred" explains:

    "The thing that makes judaism dangerous to everybody – to every race, to every nation, to every idea – is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people, these are all artificial constructions and judaism really teaches us how to see that.

    "In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real, and that’s very upsetting to people."

    ----

    This often translates into the erasing zeal on display these days. This need to bring other nation down. To befoul their heroes and gods and to mock everything they hold dear.

    “The thing that makes judaism dangerous to everybody – to every race, to every nation, to every idea – is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people, these are all artificial constructions and judaism really teaches us how to see that.”

    This level of hypocrisy is simply beyond most Gentiles’ power of imagination.

    “We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states”–except for our nation state Israel.

    “We don’t believe in gods that protect individual groups of people”–except for the G-d of the chosen people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. @biz
    I agree its tiresome, and for a person whose trademark is noticing things, Steve doesn't do much noticing that most of the leftist Jews that he pillories are actually anti-Israel and not very pro-Jewish. This Katz fellow is a writer at Mondoweiss, which surely Steve is aware of since it is highlighted in his alternate media selections.

    Opposing certain of Israel’s policies (such as its cannibalization of the West Bank) is not the same thing as being anti-Israel.

    I doubt you can name even five recognizable Americans who are Jewish and oppose the existence of a “Jewish state” in Palestine. Thus, any person who believes he is Jewish and whom Steve mentions in a post is almost certainly not anti-Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    Oh for fuck sake your comment is embarrassingly ignorant. Read mondoweiss. It is as anti-Isarael as it gets. And no, not anti Israeli policies. Anti Israel and ZOG to boot.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @biz
    I agree its tiresome, and for a person whose trademark is noticing things, Steve doesn't do much noticing that most of the leftist Jews that he pillories are actually anti-Israel and not very pro-Jewish. This Katz fellow is a writer at Mondoweiss, which surely Steve is aware of since it is highlighted in his alternate media selections.

    Geez. Does everybody have to do the censor-and-disavow thing?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. biz says:
    @Opinionator
    Opposing certain of Israel's policies (such as its cannibalization of the West Bank) is not the same thing as being anti-Israel.

    I doubt you can name even five recognizable Americans who are Jewish and oppose the existence of a "Jewish state" in Palestine. Thus, any person who believes he is Jewish and whom Steve mentions in a post is almost certainly not anti-Israel.

    Oh for fuck sake your comment is embarrassingly ignorant. Read mondoweiss. It is as anti-Isarael as it gets. And no, not anti Israeli policies. Anti Israel and ZOG to boot.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @RonaldB
    "He studied philosophy and artificial intelligence as an undergraduate at the University of Maryland and received his PhD in Brain and Cognitive Sciences from MIT."

    Katz has impressive credentials. But, a degree in artificial intelligence and a PhD in Cognitive Sciences from MIT implies a very sharp cookie completely familiar with mathematics and neurology.

    And yet, Katz completely focuses on the political side of science, which is not really science at all, but pop sociology. So, has Katz chucked his original scholastic efforts? Or, did his technical work consistently not cut the mustard, and he found the path to tenure and academic prominence through the "softer" routes of writing about the influence of racism and privilege on the development of science? His politicized talk certainly does not fit the profile of the technical person interested in problems of nature.

    He has hardly any scientific pubs. At his stage (a postdoc) that does not bode for for a career in science (i.e.,getting a tenure-track faculty position), which is probably why he’s going into political writing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @anonymous-antimarxist
    Yarden Katz is not just any Jewish Harvard Professor.

    https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/ykatz

    Yarden Katz is a departmental fellow in Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School. His scientific interests are at the interface of artificial intelligence and biology. At Berkman Klein, he is working on understanding the politics and culture of biomedical science. He is particularly interested in how scientific projects are influenced by fields thought to be external to science, like journalism and economics. What questions are prioritized, and which directions get sidelined, by seemingly “non-scientific” considerations? How do these external factors affect the building of a “commons” in biomedical science - and what can biomedical science learn from the software world about commons-building? He will focus on how privatization and the machinery of "intellectual property" law change the practice of academic biomedical research.
     
    Remember James Damore was working on his PH.D in Systems Biology at Harvard when he left for Google.

    Maybe knowing that Katz would be inspecting his thesis for anything politically incorrect was why Damore left Harvard for an elite programmer job Google in the first place?

    Oh well out of the frying pan and into the fire.

    No Place for White Men!!!

    “Maybe knowing that Katz would be inspecting his thesis for anything politically incorrect was why Damore left Harvard for an elite programmer job Google in the first place? ”

    No. Katz is a freakin’ postdoc who struggles to publish scientific articles. It’s extremely unlikely he’d be invited to be on a PhD thesis committee in lieu of a faculty member.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous-antimarxist
    You are most likely right. But still Katz's presence at Harvard is nonetheless indicative of the political climate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. AndrewR says:
    @Cagey Beast
    The fact is, Ford Corporation would do it and they'd have big grins on their faces at the ceremony. I'll bet you could even get a good dozen of Henry Ford's descendants to come out on the day, apologize and roll around in Dead Sea mud brought over just for the occasion. A bunch of strapping, 20 yr old Holocaust survivors could flog them and everyone would think it was right and good. There are no limits to this stuff anymore.

    Lmao what if the leader of the First Amerikan Reich is a direct descendant of Henry Ford.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    LIBERALS- NOW WITH EXTRA IDIOT !

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  194. @anon
    "Maybe knowing that Katz would be inspecting his thesis for anything politically incorrect was why Damore left Harvard for an elite programmer job Google in the first place? "

    No. Katz is a freakin' postdoc who struggles to publish scientific articles. It's extremely unlikely he'd be invited to be on a PhD thesis committee in lieu of a faculty member.

    You are most likely right. But still Katz’s presence at Harvard is nonetheless indicative of the political climate.

    Read More
    • Agree: Desiderius
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. Tyrion says:
    @Opinionator
    Neither the Zionist entity nor the construct "the Jewish People" are among the usual targets of critical theory.

    Israel gets plenty of stick. The Jews there are hated by much of the Western media for the crime of not agreeing to lay down and die, or at least leave and be dispossessed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. Tyrion says:
    @ogunsiron
    So ? He's one of those jews who hate israel because it doesn't live up to his idea of the jewish ideal. he's the kind of jew who hates Israel because in israel they do goyisch stuff like having an army, being patriots, promoting large families etc. He's one of those jews who thinks that it's supremely jewish to hate israel, because israel is too damn goyish.

    So ? He’s one of those jews who hate israel because it doesn’t live up to his idea of the jewish ideal. he’s the kind of jew who hates Israel because in israel they do goyisch stuff like having an army, being patriots, promoting large families etc. He’s one of those jews who thinks that it’s supremely jewish to hate israel, because israel is too damn goyish.

    Once you are reduced to claiming that a Western probably atheist and self-hating Jew hates Israel because it is not Jewish enough, you are entirely self-defeated.

    Replace Jewish with Katz’s real religion of Progressivism or Rousseaunism or slave morality or pathetic dweebishness and you will be much more accurate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. Tyrion says:
    @Opinionator
    Is he anti-Zionist or does he merely oppose some of Israel's "policies," such as its invasion and colonization of the West Bank?

    Is he anti-Zionist or does he merely oppose some of Israel’s “policies,” such as its invasion and colonization of the West Bank?

    Is Black Lives Matter anti-white or merely anti racism and police brutality?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. bomag says:
    @TG
    Reply to europeasant. Indeed. But you know, I bet that more than half the difference between the average IQ of stupid white Americans and smart white Americans is also due to genetic reasons? But so what. A healthy society needs truck drivers and plumbers as much as (if not more than) theoretical physicists and brain surgeons. In a tight labor market, all labor - skilled and unskilled alike - can do pretty good. That perhaps some races are, ON AVERAGE, possibly less smart than others, only matters if we adhere to rigid numerical racial quotas for high-skill professions. As far as the society as a whole, so what? I mean, there's lots of stupid people in Japan. But with a tight labor market, Japanese truck drivers and janitors do pretty well - better than engineers in Mexico or Bangladesh. And last I checked, despite about two decades of so-called recession, Japanese society is doing pretty well, stupid people and all.

    But you know, I bet that more than half the difference between the average IQ of… is also due to genetic reasons

    Uhm, yeah, I agree with what you said; but europeasant’s point was that what Francis Crick said comports with the evidence, but Yarden Katz acts like there is something fundamentally false about it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. Svigor says:

    Don’t you feel embarrassed litigating the difference between how anti-Jewish and how more generally anti-white some zealot of progressivism is?

    No. I learned my political chutzpah from watching Jews.

    P.S., I have seen no evidence for the idea that Katz has shown any anti-Jewish sentiment. My guess is you will produce none.

    Also, I only put in one sentence because my point only needed one sentence. Just like yours would have been accurately put across by “Jews make me feel like Whites makes Blacks feel, so where’s my social veneration of imagined victimhood?”

    Jews follow Whites around, demand access to their societies as if a God-given right, go ape when that pseudo-right is questioned. Blacks do the same. Jews have no problem having their stuff, including a state where they deny Whites immigration rights. Blacks are the same.

    So the old “parallels between Black grievances against Whites and White grievances against Jews” thing doesn’t work on me. The Jewish relationship to Whites is fundamentally the same as the Black relationship to Whites.

    Is there anything less impressive than someone desperately seeking fantasy victim status?

    So you think there’s nothing less impressive than Jews?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion
    Is there any point to anything you wrote?

    Being kind, I think I can extract one coherent line of argument. That is that Israel is more stringent in its immigration policies to non-Jewish whites than other white countries are to Jews. This is a fair criticism and I sympathise. On the other hand, Israel has a similar immigration strictness to somewhere like Poland minus EU laws. It is hardly extreme and indeed Israel has had a bucketload more immigration than any European or North American country over the last 50 years.

    You know when blacks blame whites for all of their troubles I feel a little repulsed by the whole victim mentality of it but at least there are enough whites to realistically oppress blacks. When people like you whinge about Jews it is beyond risible.

    Katz is a loser for extreme self-flagellation. You are a loser for pretty much the same reason.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. Svigor says:

    I agree its tiresome, and for a person whose trademark is noticing things, Steve doesn’t do much noticing that most of the leftist Jews that he pillories are actually anti-Israel and not very pro-Jewish. This Katz fellow is a writer at Mondoweiss, which surely Steve is aware of since it is highlighted in his alternate media selections.

    Sort of a left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing, and vice-versa, thing?

    Organized (diaspora) Jewry works the anti-pro-White agenda, and is Zionist, supports Israel. Anti-Jewish-Supremacy (anti-Zionist) sentiment is confined to the political fringe, just like pro-White advocacy is. Jewish White Supremacy (Zionism) and anti-White-Supremacy are the establishment’s order of the day. How very convenient!

    I have been among the antifa of late. Even they won’t criticize Zionism. Maybe 5% will, and then only if you drag it out of them. And even then only in a very detached, “it’s all academic” sort of way; nothing like their anti-pro-White sentiments at all.

    You guys are really some lying MFers. No respect for you at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    Svigor you are very invested in the idea that Jews - as a collective - are screwing you, so I doubt I'll be able to change your mind on that, but I'm going to try.

    First of all, please consider the role of confirmation bias. Every time a Jewish Leftist says something stupid in the media we all have a big guffaw here. On the other hand, last week when Amy Wax faced an academic lynch mob for standing up for Western values, her ethnicity went suspiciously unnoticed by Steve and this blog. Jews are on both sides of the culture wars, not just one, but only one gets noticed here. That's a big misleader.

    Secondly, your calibration on the question of how pro- or anti-Israel Leftist Jews and the Left in general are is simply off. You asked for quotes to prove that Mondoweiss is anti-Israel. That's like asking for quotes to prove that BLM is anti-white, or that the KKK is anti-black. There are a thousand quotes. It is self-evident. Mondoweiss is probably the premier anti-Israel website, and is often anti-Jewish with ZOG themes. Mondoweiss is linked from this blog all the time (for reasons which escape me) - I encourage you to just look at it. And in case you find one part where they say something that could be construed as more about one particular policy than being anti-Israel or anti-Jewish in general, remember that sometimes BLM says something that is ostensibly about police brutality or gentrification, but the overall message is clear.

    As for the left in general, your experience with Antifa must have been an outlier. The Intersectional Left in America and Europe is now quite anti-Israel. Occupy Wall Street endorsed BDS, the Green Party endorsed BDS, anti-Israel activism and support for BDS is now huge on elite college campuses, the British Labour party is now anti-Israel, and you can look at polls of Democratic voters,' especially minority Democratic voters', attitudes toward Israel. For some documentation of the centrality of anti-Israel (and antisemitic) opinions on the activist Intersectional Left now (and for the past decade at least), I encourage you to check out some of the photographs of Leftist rallies collected on the Zombietime blog.

    The Intersectional, Postmodern, etc. Left is quite anti-Israel and fairly anti-Jewish, and the Leftist Jews that write for the Guardian etc. that Steve often highlights the stupidity of generally are as well. Say what you will about them and their silly and potentially destructive opinions, but they are simply not the hypocrites that you (and Steve, unfortunately) are making them out to be on that one particular question. And, importantly, they are not doing what they are doing as representatives of some larger Jewish collective.

    The last thing I would ask you to consider is that the parallel that you have drawn between Zionism and American White Nationalism is incorrect. Zionism is, rather, akin to Italian or Japanese or Dutch or Romanian nationalism or patriotism. The idea is that an ethnicity in the Old World gets a country in their historic homeland. So sure, you can find plenty of people who are Zionist but oppose American White Nationalism (and can you blame them, because they would be excluded from America under most conceptions of that?!), but that does not make them hypocrites. They would be hypocrites if they were Zionists but opposed the existence of Italy or Romania. But hardly anyone is like that. On the other hand, there are plenty of people who are ok with Italy or Romania but are against Zionism - they are the hypocrites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. Svigor says:

    Except that the people cited in the disingenuous blog here are part of this very website, writers for Mondoweiss (anti-Israel conspiracy theorists with Yiddish origin surnames, who work alongside far-right bloggers like this one, belonging to this blogger’s own website). No, I did not miss the point. The point here is that the far-left and far-right are openly aligned, in the case of this very website and blog, which, reading for me, is like looking at a car-crash.

    So, you’re either Jewish, or a dyed-in-the-wool patriotard. IME those are the only groups who make “observations” that inane (far left and far right openly aligned, lol). It takes a lot of chutzpah and ethnocentrism (Jews), or a desperate form of ignorance (patriotards) to push something that offensive to common sense and simple observation.

    I was hoping for that too, but if that was really the case, you’d think somewhere in those thousand flowers could be one that has something nuanced to say about Israel and/or is generally positive on Jewish contributions to America.

    The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection

    A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

    Yes he probably does, because, for the millionth time, Yarden Katz writes for the virulently and tediously anti-Israel Mondoweiss blog.

    When Jews start calling criticism of Apartheid or Segregation “virulently and tediously anti-White,” or the latter “virulently and tediously anti-American,” you might get some traction with that quote.

    P.S., you want tedious, look at all the anti-White advocacy Jews extrude. Look at how virulently and tediously anti-White the entire American establishment is.

    All Lot has do to is pick any media outlet that’s not been regulated to the dank corners of badthink. I’m surrounded.

    This. But no, gotta chase down and bayonet the remaining 1%.

    A. It is totally OK for everyone to bash white people including Jews as white people.

    B. It is totally not OK for non-Jewish whites to bash Jews.

    C. It is totally not OK for Jewish whites to bash white gentiles.

    None of this is contradictory…

    Is this being served straight, or with a twist? I honestly can’t tell.

    Douglas Rushkoff, author of “Nothing Sacred” explains:

    “The thing that makes judaism dangerous to everybody – to every race, to every nation, to every idea – is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people, these are all artificial constructions and judaism really teaches us how to see that.

    “In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real, and that’s very upsetting to people.”

    Yeah, nothing sacred but the Jews. Hence my mission of reciprocity.

    So ? He’s one of those jews who hate israel because it doesn’t live up to his idea of the jewish ideal. he’s the kind of jew who hates Israel because in israel they do goyisch stuff like having an army, being patriots, promoting large families etc. He’s one of those jews who thinks that it’s supremely jewish to hate israel, because israel is too damn goyish.

    Does he even hate Israel? Or is he just doing what Yankee Whites did about Segregation and Apartheid?

    Is he anti-Zionist or does he merely oppose some of Israel’s “policies,” such as its invasion and colonization of the West Bank?

    This. Jews have this princess and the pea thing where opposing Jewish White Supremacy (Zionism) is anti-Jewish but it’s nonsense. And it’s not even apparent that Katz opposes Zionism. More like I said above, and as you suggest, he’s opposing Jews’ version of Segregation or Apartheid.

    Oh for fuck sake your comment is embarrassingly ignorant. Read mondoweiss. It is as anti-Isarael as it gets. And no, not anti Israeli policies. Anti Israel and ZOG to boot.

    Give us some juicy quotes? I ask purely out of curiosity; the issue at hand is Katz, not Mondoweiss in general, and there has so far been nothing produced to show that Katz is anti-Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    More like I said above, and as you suggest, he’s opposing Jews’ version of Segregation or Apartheid.

    We cannot even say for sure that Katz opposes segregation or apartheid. What is happening in the West Bank might reasonably be described as colonization, conquest, or ethnic cleansing on the down low. Furthermore, is Judaism itself an expression of segregation or apartheid? Does Katz renounce it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. Svigor says:

    I mean you guys can’t even make the case that I’m anti-Israel. I hold Jews’ feet to the fire because they’re up to no good; suppressing in others that which they enthusiastically engage in themselves. And because they are the primary adversaries of Whites having for themselves what Jews have for themselves. That is the font of any criticism I make of Israel. Start reciprocating (Whites are fine with pro-Jewish politics and sentiment; return the favor) and I end my criticism of Israel. In fact, Zionists and pro-Whites are natural allies, but for Jewish malfeasance on the matter. I’d love it if Jews would let me be fully pro-Israel (I make plenty of pro-Israel comments, too, but those are “antisemitic” too, in Jewish Supremacy World).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  203. Svigor says:

    one that has something nuanced to say about Israel

    “Nuanced,” lol. The standard Jewish line (one you push constantly) is that criticizing Israel means you’re anti-Israel (and concomitant antisemitism is at least implied). Yeah you’re the king of nuance.

    I give you nuance. My position on Israel is textbook nuance; I’m tactically anti-Israel because Jews are virulently and tediously opposed to White Zionism, pro-White politics, but I’m a natural ally because I want for my people what Jews have for themselves, and more generally, would like the entire world to work a lot more like Israel than it currently does. But Jewish Supremacy (EVERYTHING has got to go the Jews’ way, much like Nazism, Germanic Supremacy, demanded that EVERYTHING go Germany’s way) is mucking up the works.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  204. Svigor says:

    Once you are reduced to claiming that a Western probably atheist and self-hating Jew hates Israel because it is not Jewish enough, you are entirely self-defeated.

    Replace Jewish with Katz’s real religion of Progressivism or Rousseaunism or slave morality or pathetic dweebishness and you will be much more accurate.

    Atheism, secularism, levels of observance, these are all neither here nor there. Most diaspora Jews are some flavor of atheist or agnostic, and they overwhelmingly support Zionism, “leftism,” and “anti-racism,” all at the same time. Jewish Supremacy is the obvious common factor.

    Israel gets plenty of stick. The Jews there are hated by much of the Western media for the crime of not agreeing to lay down and die, or at least leave and be dispossessed.

    This is Jewish ethnocentrism talking; the Princess and the Pea. It’s like a billionaire complaining about how he has billions of dollars but still can’t find a good assistant (who lives up to his neurotic, egomaniacal standards). Congress gives Bibi Stalinesque ovations. Which member of that body caught any flak for that from Big Media? Which Congressman is anti-Zionist or anti-Israel? Which Big Media mouthpiece?

    Cite us some American Big Media crit of Israel. Better yet, cite us some Americans fired for being Jewish White Supremacists (Zionists), harassed, unpersoned, assaulted, etc. You know; the treatment pro-Whites get.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  205. Svigor says:

    Tyrion, you seem fresh off the boat here in iSteve world, so I’ll give you a friendly piece of advice: read/lurk more, and respond less (maybe go back through the iSteve archives and read comments to threads like this one). We’ve been demolishing the Orthodox Jewish Narrative around here for ages, and you aren’t serving up anything we haven’t heard before. The stuff Jews tell each other in their echo chamber is complete garbage. It only works in the echo chamber, and in PC zones. This is a free speech zone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion

    Tyrion, you seem fresh off the boat here in iSteve world
     
    Lol, it is actually more than half my life.

    We’ve been demolishing the Orthodox Jewish Narrative
     
    What on earth are you rambling about?

    2 Jews, 3 opinions is practically banal as an observation.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. Except francis crick was entirely correct. There is a massive desparity between aftican intellectual potential and other races. And he was also correct that theres no signs of it fixing itself.

    Go look up any negative statistic you want. Rape, child marriage, death rate, avg age of death. Africa is the worst every time. Why? Because they have excessively low IQs.

    You attack science but its not science fault africans are unintelligent. In fact science might be their only hope at ever catching up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  207. Svigor says:

    Is he anti-Zionist or does he merely oppose some of Israel’s “policies,” such as its invasion and colonization of the West Bank?

    Is Black Lives Matter anti-white or merely anti racism and police brutality?

    Are Jews anti-White racists, or merely anti-racist? Oh, wait, Zionism and Israel, massive Jewish advocacy for all of the preceding. Definitely racist vs. Whites.

    Are Jewish critics of Segregation anti-racist, or anti-White?

    Are Jewish critics of Apartheid anti-racist, or anti-White?

    I suppose these are all good questions to explore.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  208. @ogunsiron
    Douglas Rushkoff, author of "Nothing Sacred" explains:

    "The thing that makes judaism dangerous to everybody – to every race, to every nation, to every idea – is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people, these are all artificial constructions and judaism really teaches us how to see that.

    "In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real, and that’s very upsetting to people."

    ----

    This often translates into the erasing zeal on display these days. This need to bring other nation down. To befoul their heroes and gods and to mock everything they hold dear.

    “In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real, and that’s very upsetting to people.”

    That sounds a lot like hie co-ethnic Michael Ledeen:

    Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    The Great Satan is here, and He is us.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. biz says:
    @Svigor

    I agree its tiresome, and for a person whose trademark is noticing things, Steve doesn’t do much noticing that most of the leftist Jews that he pillories are actually anti-Israel and not very pro-Jewish. This Katz fellow is a writer at Mondoweiss, which surely Steve is aware of since it is highlighted in his alternate media selections.
     
    Sort of a left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing, and vice-versa, thing?

    Organized (diaspora) Jewry works the anti-pro-White agenda, and is Zionist, supports Israel. Anti-Jewish-Supremacy (anti-Zionist) sentiment is confined to the political fringe, just like pro-White advocacy is. Jewish White Supremacy (Zionism) and anti-White-Supremacy are the establishment's order of the day. How very convenient!

    I have been among the antifa of late. Even they won't criticize Zionism. Maybe 5% will, and then only if you drag it out of them. And even then only in a very detached, "it's all academic" sort of way; nothing like their anti-pro-White sentiments at all.

    You guys are really some lying MFers. No respect for you at all.

    Svigor you are very invested in the idea that Jews – as a collective – are screwing you, so I doubt I’ll be able to change your mind on that, but I’m going to try.

    First of all, please consider the role of confirmation bias. Every time a Jewish Leftist says something stupid in the media we all have a big guffaw here. On the other hand, last week when Amy Wax faced an academic lynch mob for standing up for Western values, her ethnicity went suspiciously unnoticed by Steve and this blog. Jews are on both sides of the culture wars, not just one, but only one gets noticed here. That’s a big misleader.

    Secondly, your calibration on the question of how pro- or anti-Israel Leftist Jews and the Left in general are is simply off. You asked for quotes to prove that Mondoweiss is anti-Israel. That’s like asking for quotes to prove that BLM is anti-white, or that the KKK is anti-black. There are a thousand quotes. It is self-evident. Mondoweiss is probably the premier anti-Israel website, and is often anti-Jewish with ZOG themes. Mondoweiss is linked from this blog all the time (for reasons which escape me) – I encourage you to just look at it. And in case you find one part where they say something that could be construed as more about one particular policy than being anti-Israel or anti-Jewish in general, remember that sometimes BLM says something that is ostensibly about police brutality or gentrification, but the overall message is clear.

    As for the left in general, your experience with Antifa must have been an outlier. The Intersectional Left in America and Europe is now quite anti-Israel. Occupy Wall Street endorsed BDS, the Green Party endorsed BDS, anti-Israel activism and support for BDS is now huge on elite college campuses, the British Labour party is now anti-Israel, and you can look at polls of Democratic voters,’ especially minority Democratic voters’, attitudes toward Israel. For some documentation of the centrality of anti-Israel (and antisemitic) opinions on the activist Intersectional Left now (and for the past decade at least), I encourage you to check out some of the photographs of Leftist rallies collected on the Zombietime blog.

    The Intersectional, Postmodern, etc. Left is quite anti-Israel and fairly anti-Jewish, and the Leftist Jews that write for the Guardian etc. that Steve often highlights the stupidity of generally are as well. Say what you will about them and their silly and potentially destructive opinions, but they are simply not the hypocrites that you (and Steve, unfortunately) are making them out to be on that one particular question. And, importantly, they are not doing what they are doing as representatives of some larger Jewish collective.

    The last thing I would ask you to consider is that the parallel that you have drawn between Zionism and American White Nationalism is incorrect. Zionism is, rather, akin to Italian or Japanese or Dutch or Romanian nationalism or patriotism. The idea is that an ethnicity in the Old World gets a country in their historic homeland. So sure, you can find plenty of people who are Zionist but oppose American White Nationalism (and can you blame them, because they would be excluded from America under most conceptions of that?!), but that does not make them hypocrites. They would be hypocrites if they were Zionists but opposed the existence of Italy or Romania. But hardly anyone is like that. On the other hand, there are plenty of people who are ok with Italy or Romania but are against Zionism – they are the hypocrites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. @Svigor

    Except that the people cited in the disingenuous blog here are part of this very website, writers for Mondoweiss (anti-Israel conspiracy theorists with Yiddish origin surnames, who work alongside far-right bloggers like this one, belonging to this blogger’s own website). No, I did not miss the point. The point here is that the far-left and far-right are openly aligned, in the case of this very website and blog, which, reading for me, is like looking at a car-crash.
     
    So, you're either Jewish, or a dyed-in-the-wool patriotard. IME those are the only groups who make "observations" that inane (far left and far right openly aligned, lol). It takes a lot of chutzpah and ethnocentrism (Jews), or a desperate form of ignorance (patriotards) to push something that offensive to common sense and simple observation.

    I was hoping for that too, but if that was really the case, you’d think somewhere in those thousand flowers could be one that has something nuanced to say about Israel and/or is generally positive on Jewish contributions to America.
     

    The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection

    A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
     

    Yes he probably does, because, for the millionth time, Yarden Katz writes for the virulently and tediously anti-Israel Mondoweiss blog.
     
    When Jews start calling criticism of Apartheid or Segregation "virulently and tediously anti-White," or the latter "virulently and tediously anti-American," you might get some traction with that quote.

    P.S., you want tedious, look at all the anti-White advocacy Jews extrude. Look at how virulently and tediously anti-White the entire American establishment is.

    All Lot has do to is pick any media outlet that’s not been regulated to the dank corners of badthink. I’m surrounded.
     
    This. But no, gotta chase down and bayonet the remaining 1%.

    A. It is totally OK for everyone to bash white people including Jews as white people.

    B. It is totally not OK for non-Jewish whites to bash Jews.

    C. It is totally not OK for Jewish whites to bash white gentiles.

    None of this is contradictory…
     
    Is this being served straight, or with a twist? I honestly can't tell.

    Douglas Rushkoff, author of “Nothing Sacred” explains:

    “The thing that makes judaism dangerous to everybody – to every race, to every nation, to every idea – is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people, these are all artificial constructions and judaism really teaches us how to see that.

    “In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real, and that’s very upsetting to people.”
     
    Yeah, nothing sacred but the Jews. Hence my mission of reciprocity.

    So ? He’s one of those jews who hate israel because it doesn’t live up to his idea of the jewish ideal. he’s the kind of jew who hates Israel because in israel they do goyisch stuff like having an army, being patriots, promoting large families etc. He’s one of those jews who thinks that it’s supremely jewish to hate israel, because israel is too damn goyish.
     
    Does he even hate Israel? Or is he just doing what Yankee Whites did about Segregation and Apartheid?

    Is he anti-Zionist or does he merely oppose some of Israel’s “policies,” such as its invasion and colonization of the West Bank?
     
    This. Jews have this princess and the pea thing where opposing Jewish White Supremacy (Zionism) is anti-Jewish but it's nonsense. And it's not even apparent that Katz opposes Zionism. More like I said above, and as you suggest, he's opposing Jews' version of Segregation or Apartheid.

    Oh for fuck sake your comment is embarrassingly ignorant. Read mondoweiss. It is as anti-Isarael as it gets. And no, not anti Israeli policies. Anti Israel and ZOG to boot.
     
    Give us some juicy quotes? I ask purely out of curiosity; the issue at hand is Katz, not Mondoweiss in general, and there has so far been nothing produced to show that Katz is anti-Israel.

    More like I said above, and as you suggest, he’s opposing Jews’ version of Segregation or Apartheid.

    We cannot even say for sure that Katz opposes segregation or apartheid. What is happening in the West Bank might reasonably be described as colonization, conquest, or ethnic cleansing on the down low. Furthermore, is Judaism itself an expression of segregation or apartheid? Does Katz renounce it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz

    be described as colonization, conquest, or ethnic cleansing on the down low
     
    Yeah, the only "ethnic cleansing" where the supposed target population has the highest rate of population increase in the world.

    What is it about Israel that makes antis so stupid? Is there a prion being spread at these SJP rallies?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. @ben tillman

    “In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real, and that’s very upsetting to people.”
     
    That sounds a lot like hie co-ethnic Michael Ledeen:


    Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.
     

    The Great Satan is here, and He is us.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. Ben Frank says:

    Boil it down to the essentials. This is a skirmish in the global north-south war.
    Tear down civilization. Turn the US into Brazil or maybe Zimbabwe.
    It’s a death-cult. Leftists want to die and kill you first.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  213. Tyrion says:
    @Svigor

    Don’t you feel embarrassed litigating the difference between how anti-Jewish and how more generally anti-white some zealot of progressivism is?
     
    No. I learned my political chutzpah from watching Jews.

    P.S., I have seen no evidence for the idea that Katz has shown any anti-Jewish sentiment. My guess is you will produce none.

    Also, I only put in one sentence because my point only needed one sentence. Just like yours would have been accurately put across by “Jews make me feel like Whites makes Blacks feel, so where’s my social veneration of imagined victimhood?”
     
    Jews follow Whites around, demand access to their societies as if a God-given right, go ape when that pseudo-right is questioned. Blacks do the same. Jews have no problem having their stuff, including a state where they deny Whites immigration rights. Blacks are the same.

    So the old "parallels between Black grievances against Whites and White grievances against Jews" thing doesn't work on me. The Jewish relationship to Whites is fundamentally the same as the Black relationship to Whites.

    Is there anything less impressive than someone desperately seeking fantasy victim status?
     
    So you think there's nothing less impressive than Jews?

    Is there any point to anything you wrote?

    Being kind, I think I can extract one coherent line of argument. That is that Israel is more stringent in its immigration policies to non-Jewish whites than other white countries are to Jews. This is a fair criticism and I sympathise. On the other hand, Israel has a similar immigration strictness to somewhere like Poland minus EU laws. It is hardly extreme and indeed Israel has had a bucketload more immigration than any European or North American country over the last 50 years.

    You know when blacks blame whites for all of their troubles I feel a little repulsed by the whole victim mentality of it but at least there are enough whites to realistically oppress blacks. When people like you whinge about Jews it is beyond risible.

    Katz is a loser for extreme self-flagellation. You are a loser for pretty much the same reason.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. Jews invented nuclear weapons.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  215. syonredux says:

    Now they want to demonize Francis Crick https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/09/21/now-they-want-to-demonize-francis-crick … prediction is ‘crick will fall’; the point abt ‘private letters’ is naive

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Bold words for someone who was willing to demonize Ron Unz who gave him a platform when most wouldn't.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. Wally says:
    @Jack D

    Why aren’t there more decent, non-disgusting names in history like Weinstein and Katz?
     
    Well , maybe not Weinstein and Katz but we have Einstein and Born (and 1/4 of all Nobel Prizes, even though the Jews are a tiny fraction of the world population or even the white population). So that's not chopped liver.

    Maybe if you are black you talk down the accomplishments of the "Great White Men of Science" out of jealousy, which accounts for Chanda's issue (despite the name, Chanda identifies as "black" even though she is only slightly more black than Rachel Dolezal) but Jews have nothing to be jealous about so I don't know what Katz's excuse is, other than he too is another mediocrity.

    ” a tiny fraction of the world population” my ass.

    Jewish law states that Jews are to avoid being counted, therefore many Jews dodge being counted.

    Many Jews do not consider themselves religious, but do consider themselves to be ‘Jews’, therefore they do not show up as ‘Jews’ in censuses which count the number of Jews via a question on religious beliefs.

    There are clearly more Jews than we are led to believe.

    see:
    The Numbers Game

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7843

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Maybe you can explain why the Book of Numbers details two censuses?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. @syonredux

    Now they want to demonize Francis Crick https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/09/21/now-they-want-to-demonize-francis-crick … prediction is 'crick will fall'; the point abt 'private letters' is naive
     
    https://twitter.com/razibkhan/status/910880912648306688

    Bold words for someone who was willing to demonize Ron Unz who gave him a platform when most wouldn’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ogunsiron
    He seems completely and utterly surrounded by #ScienceMarch types, so distancing himself from a place like this must partly be a question of survival. Some of his former co-bloggers from the scienceBlogs days are ghastly people like PZ Myers.

    Has he actually disavowed Unz ? I wouldn't be surprised if there was an actual group of people dedicated to watching his every move (razib's) in the hopes of making him pay for his earlier "heresies".
    , @syonredux

    Bold words for someone who was willing to demonize Ron Unz who gave him a platform when most wouldn’t.
     
    Well, alongside the wheat (Steve Sailer, John Derbyshire, Anatoly Karlin, James Thompson, etc), Ron does have a lot of chaff (Gustavo Arrelano, Paul Craig Roberts, Fred Reed (when he's on one of his anti-evolution/ pro-Latinx rants), etc).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. biz says:
    @Opinionator
    More like I said above, and as you suggest, he’s opposing Jews’ version of Segregation or Apartheid.

    We cannot even say for sure that Katz opposes segregation or apartheid. What is happening in the West Bank might reasonably be described as colonization, conquest, or ethnic cleansing on the down low. Furthermore, is Judaism itself an expression of segregation or apartheid? Does Katz renounce it?

    be described as colonization, conquest, or ethnic cleansing on the down low

    Yeah, the only “ethnic cleansing” where the supposed target population has the highest rate of population increase in the world.

    What is it about Israel that makes antis so stupid? Is there a prion being spread at these SJP rallies?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Brutusale
    Yet Africans are killing each other on a wholesale basis but their population growth is geometric bordering on the exponential.

    What is it about Israel that makes so many Jews react in ways at odds with their superior intellects?

    I've got no problem with the Israelis doing whatever it takes to defend their territory, even those "occupied" areas. Just be straightforward about the means.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. ogunsiron says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Bold words for someone who was willing to demonize Ron Unz who gave him a platform when most wouldn't.

    He seems completely and utterly surrounded by #ScienceMarch types, so distancing himself from a place like this must partly be a question of survival. Some of his former co-bloggers from the scienceBlogs days are ghastly people like PZ Myers.

    Has he actually disavowed Unz ? I wouldn’t be surprised if there was an actual group of people dedicated to watching his every move (razib’s) in the hopes of making him pay for his earlier “heresies”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @benjaminl
    I don't know if he officially denounced or disavowed, but he made the mistake of trying to reason with the author of this hit piece, only to find, surprise, the author was trying to smear him.

    Personally I can't blame anyone who does what they have to do, to try to keep a job within mainstream institutions.


    https://undark.org/article/race-science-razib-khan-racism/

    The way Khan tells the story, he was caught off guard by the sudden rise of the alt-right, and by the extremist turn of Unz’s website. The day before I contacted him to request an interview, Khan announced that he was leaving The Unz Review. His new standalone blog, still called Gene Expression, launched in January. Over the phone, he told me that the move was partly because he wanted to be an independent blogger again, and partly because he had grown uncomfortable with some of the material on Unz’s site. He framed the issue as an image problem, not a moral one. “I wasn’t comfortable with some of the co-branding,” he said.

    Hadn’t Sailer and other Unz contributors been writing things like this for years? Khan said that he used to be more tolerant of those perspectives. “Obviously, I don’t condone it,” he said. When I observed that standing by silently — and even linking to Sailer’s work — seemed like the definition of “condone,” Khan hesitated. “In terms of being at Unz, I was probably there too long,” he said.
     
    https://twitter.com/JacobPhD/status/836761123017768961
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. Does he have a brother named Hausen Katz?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  221. syonredux says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Bold words for someone who was willing to demonize Ron Unz who gave him a platform when most wouldn't.

    Bold words for someone who was willing to demonize Ron Unz who gave him a platform when most wouldn’t.

    Well, alongside the wheat (Steve Sailer, John Derbyshire, Anatoly Karlin, James Thompson, etc), Ron does have a lot of chaff (Gustavo Arrelano, Paul Craig Roberts, Fred Reed (when he’s on one of his anti-evolution/ pro-Latinx rants), etc).

    Read More
    • Replies: @benjaminl
    I'm sure that Ron would say that none of us can agree which is the wheat, and which is the chaff.... My list is the same as your list though.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    " a tiny fraction of the world population" my ass.

    Jewish law states that Jews are to avoid being counted, therefore many Jews dodge being counted.

    Many Jews do not consider themselves religious, but do consider themselves to be 'Jews', therefore they do not show up as 'Jews' in censuses which count the number of Jews via a question on religious beliefs.

    There are clearly more Jews than we are led to believe.

    see:
    The Numbers Game
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7843

    Maybe you can explain why the Book of Numbers details two censuses?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. Frankie P says:
    @John Gruskos
    Don't be bitter just because your ancestors were wasting their average 115 IQs swindling Polish peasants, while the Anglo-Saxons were using their average 100 IQs to create science, the industrial revolution, representative government, end slavery, explore the globe etc.

    Dude,

    All wrong! They weren’t wasting their 115 IQs swindling Polish peasants; they were wasting the 115 IQs head banging to the Talmudic study rap, under the tyranny of the rabbis. They were wasting their 115 IQs on pilpul, trying to square the circle of the endless contradictions they found in the different readings and interpretations of their holy text. The “Jewish Renaissance” never would have happened without the fertile intellectual ground that Christian Western Europe provided; they would still be in Poland, nodding and arguing about what exactly that rabbi meant when he wrote…

    Frankie P

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. Tyrion says:
    @Svigor
    Tyrion, you seem fresh off the boat here in iSteve world, so I'll give you a friendly piece of advice: read/lurk more, and respond less (maybe go back through the iSteve archives and read comments to threads like this one). We've been demolishing the Orthodox Jewish Narrative around here for ages, and you aren't serving up anything we haven't heard before. The stuff Jews tell each other in their echo chamber is complete garbage. It only works in the echo chamber, and in PC zones. This is a free speech zone.

    Tyrion, you seem fresh off the boat here in iSteve world

    Lol, it is actually more than half my life.

    We’ve been demolishing the Orthodox Jewish Narrative

    What on earth are you rambling about?

    2 Jews, 3 opinions is practically banal as an observation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  225. Thirdeye says:
    @grapesoda
    Eugenics is mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita:

    "When irreligion is prominent in the family, the women of the family become corrupt, and from the degradation of womanhood, O descendant of Vrsni, comes unwanted progeny. When there is increase of unwanted population, a hellish situation is created both for the family and for those who destroy the family tradition." Bg 1.40-41

    This knowledge has been around for a long time and is easily observable. It didn't require the discovery of genetics as we know it in the modern sense.

    That passage addresses family dysfunction, not eugenics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. Thirdeye says:
    @larry lurker
    From Richard Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution:

    Political opposition to eugenic breeding of humans sometimes spills over into the almost certainly false assertion that it is impossible. Not only is it immoral, you may hear it said, it wouldn’t work. Unfortunately, to say that something is morally wrong, or politically undesirable, is not to say that it wouldn’t work. I have no doubt that, if you set your mind to it and had enough time and enough political power, you could breed a race of superior body-builders, or high-jumpers, or shot-putters; pearl fishers, sumo wrestlers, or sprinters; or (I suspect, although now with less confidence because there are no animal precedents) superior musicians, poets, mathematicians or wine-tasters.
     

    Dawkins is talking about positive eugenics, which would be a questionable enterprise. Negative eugenics is about stopping maladaptive traits (which might also inadvertently show up as a side effect of positive eugenics). But if the circumstances under which child-bearing is permissible were regulated (e.g. completion of high school or G.E.D., not on welfare, no recent pattern of criminal behavior, mentally competent functioning adult…..) it would probably exclude people with genetically-based inabilities as well as garden-variety fuckups.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  227. Svigor says:

    Being kind, I think I can extract one coherent line of argument. That is that Israel is more stringent in its immigration policies to non-Jewish whites than other white countries are to Jews. This is a fair criticism and I sympathise. On the other hand, Israel has a similar immigration strictness to somewhere like Poland minus EU laws. It is hardly extreme and indeed Israel has had a bucketload more immigration than any European or North American country over the last 50 years.

    Israel is a Jewish White Supremacist state, by diaspora Jewish standards (i.e., if diaspora Jews honestly applied their own standards, they’d call Israel and Zionism “White Supremacist)). Diaspora Jews overwhelmingly support their own White Supremacist state, but their most vociferous and enduring political pastime is denying anything like it to Whites.

    You know when blacks blame whites for all of their troubles

    Straw man (Jews love straw men; changing the subject is a good thing). Going before a judge and saying “why are you blaming me for all the world’s problems?” isn’t going to persuade him to drop the charges.

    Katz is a loser for extreme self-flagellation. You are a loser for pretty much the same reason.

    Zzzzzz….

    What on earth are you rambling about?

    2 Jews, 3 opinions is practically banal as an observation.

    Jew uses old Jewish saw to prove Jews don’t use old Jewish saws. If I knew how to code I could write an algorithm for how Jews argue these issues. Many of their defense mechanisms are culturally engrained (the final one being “leave the scene ASAP, purge short-term memory of conversation, start Orthodox flowchart fresh on next encounter”; that comes after all their arguments are steamrolled.)

    Yeah, the only “ethnic cleansing” where the supposed target population has the highest rate of population increase in the world.

    What is it about Israel that makes antis so stupid? Is there a prion being spread at these SJP rallies?

    IIRC, ethnic cleansing is about removing an ethnic group from an area. If I move Jews out of the Levant I’ve ethnically cleansed them from that location; their breeding rate can be whatever it wants to be.

    Maybe you can explain why the Book of Numbers details two censuses?

    Judaism went through a lot of changes over the years. The Hebrews of the OT were quite different from the Jews of the Talmud, for example. Formation of new religious laws (say, through a change in interpretation) wouldn’t exactly set an historical precedent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  228. Svigor says:

    Tyr, if you’ve been here half your life, and assuming you aren’t in short pants, then you should know by now that Jews’ problem is that they’re on the wrong side of the issue. That makes it hard to win arguments.

    Israel gets plenty of stick. The Jews there are hated by much of the Western media for the crime of not agreeing to lay down and die, or at least leave and be dispossessed.

    Steve didn’t like my previous response to this, so I’ll give my TL;DR version. That quote is nonsense. It’s also instructive; pro-Whites get fired, harassed, unpersoned, and assaulted.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  229. Svigor says:

    First of all, please consider the role of confirmation bias. Every time a Jewish Leftist says something stupid in the media we all have a big guffaw here. On the other hand, last week when Amy Wax faced an academic lynch mob for standing up for Western values, her ethnicity went suspiciously unnoticed by Steve and this blog. Jews are on both sides of the culture wars, not just one, but only one gets noticed here. That’s a big misleader.

    Amy Wax hasn’t really been on my radar, so I’m going to withhold comment on that. But you’re barking up the wrong tree. I love me some Righteous Jews. I love Stephen Miller. I call him the World’s Greatest Righteous Jew every chance I get. I’d make him PotUS if I could. I like Mark Steyn, Paul Gottfried, Nicholas Stix, etc.

    Obviously there are no absolutes when it comes to human social behavior. But the big picture here is not “Jews on both the pro-White and anti-White” side. It’s “Jews on the anti-White side, with a few outliers on the pro-White side.” And I see a lot of asterisks on pro-White Jews, btw; they often pursue Jews’ interests, on our side of the fence, far more than they do Whites’.

    Mondoweiss is probably the premier anti-Israel website

    That’s not saying much.

    and is often anti-Jewish with ZOG themes. Mondoweiss is linked from this blog all the time (for reasons which escape me) – I encourage you to just look at it.

    I’ve read many a MW piece, along with commentary. It all seems pro-Palestinian to me; it only seems anti-Israel in the way one might call anti-Apartheid Jews anti-White or anti-South-Africa, anti-Segregation Jews anti-White or anti-American or Anti-Southern, etc.

    As for the left in general, your experience with Antifa must have been an outlier. The Intersectional Left in America and Europe is now quite anti-Israel. Occupy Wall Street endorsed BDS, the Green Party endorsed BDS

    I’ll take your word on OWS and the GP, because one is dead and the other’s a nobody. The establishment is very pro-Israel and pro-Jewish-White-Supremacy (Zionist). The establishment is what matters. There are no anti-Zionist or anti-Israel members of Congress. There are no anti-Zionist or anti-Israel Big Media mouthpieces. Meanwhile the entire establishment is full-throat anti-pro-White.

    anti-Israel activism and support for BDS is now huge on elite college campuses

    Meaning, BDS candidates have won a few student elections. Meaning, on the horizon there’s a threat to the Zionist lock on the establishment.

    the British Labour party is now anti-Israel,

    I’m talking American politics.

    and you can look at polls of Democratic voters,’ especially minority Democratic voters’, attitudes toward Israel.

    Like, say, the fact that 75% of Jews (overwhelmingly Zionist) voted against Trump, and 72% voted for Hillary?

    The Intersectional, Postmodern, etc. Left is quite anti-Israel and fairly anti-Jewish, and the Leftist Jews that write for the Guardian etc. that Steve often highlights the stupidity of generally are as well. Say what you will about them and their silly and potentially destructive opinions, but they are simply not the hypocrites that you (and Steve, unfortunately) are making them out to be on that one particular question. And, importantly, they are not doing what they are doing as representatives of some larger Jewish collective.

    I’m not willing to take your word for it. I just don’t see the same reality you do. In my experience, Jews have an extremely diminished capacity to stand in anyone else’s shoes. They are too ethnocentric, too particularist. They simply can’t honestly assess questions about how they’d treat this criticism of Jews if it were criticism of Whites instead, or how they treat that manifestation of White ethnocentrism if it were Jews instead, etc. You guys routinely complain about problems that pro-Whites dream of having.

    The last thing I would ask you to consider is that the parallel that you have drawn between Zionism and American White Nationalism is incorrect. Zionism is, rather, akin to Italian or Japanese or Dutch or Romanian nationalism or patriotism. The idea is that an ethnicity in the Old World gets a country in their historic homeland.

    You’re being over-specific. It’s a form of special pleading fallacy, I suppose. It’s a common Jewish tactic; find something contextually unique to Zionism and use it as a criteria to write off White Nationalism as invalid. Jews don’t dictate the terms of self-determination. If Jews have a right to Zion, the rest of humanity has the right to their Zions, however they like them. Jews don’t get special rights.

    So sure, you can find plenty of people who are Zionist but oppose American White Nationalism (and can you blame them, because they would be excluded from America under most conceptions of that?!)

    1 Whites are excluded from Israel, so excluding Jews from White Nationalist territory would simply be reciprocity.
    2 Jews won’t admit this as one of their motivations, generally speaking, because their loathing of reciprocity is bad optics.
    3 There is no flavor of pro-White politics that satisfies Jews. Jews would not tolerate a flavor of WNism that promised not to reciprocate Israeli immigration policy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  230. Brutusale says:
    @biz

    be described as colonization, conquest, or ethnic cleansing on the down low
     
    Yeah, the only "ethnic cleansing" where the supposed target population has the highest rate of population increase in the world.

    What is it about Israel that makes antis so stupid? Is there a prion being spread at these SJP rallies?

    Yet Africans are killing each other on a wholesale basis but their population growth is geometric bordering on the exponential.

    What is it about Israel that makes so many Jews react in ways at odds with their superior intellects?

    I’ve got no problem with the Israelis doing whatever it takes to defend their territory, even those “occupied” areas. Just be straightforward about the means.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Opinionator
    I’ve got no problem with the Israelis doing whatever it takes to defend their territory, even those “occupied” areas. Just be straightforward about the means.

    And do you afford Palestinians the same deference?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  231. benjaminl says:
    @syonredux

    Bold words for someone who was willing to demonize Ron Unz who gave him a platform when most wouldn’t.
     
    Well, alongside the wheat (Steve Sailer, John Derbyshire, Anatoly Karlin, James Thompson, etc), Ron does have a lot of chaff (Gustavo Arrelano, Paul Craig Roberts, Fred Reed (when he's on one of his anti-evolution/ pro-Latinx rants), etc).

    I’m sure that Ron would say that none of us can agree which is the wheat, and which is the chaff…. My list is the same as your list though.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  232. benjaminl says:
    @ogunsiron
    He seems completely and utterly surrounded by #ScienceMarch types, so distancing himself from a place like this must partly be a question of survival. Some of his former co-bloggers from the scienceBlogs days are ghastly people like PZ Myers.

    Has he actually disavowed Unz ? I wouldn't be surprised if there was an actual group of people dedicated to watching his every move (razib's) in the hopes of making him pay for his earlier "heresies".

    I don’t know if he officially denounced or disavowed, but he made the mistake of trying to reason with the author of this hit piece, only to find, surprise, the author was trying to smear him.

    Personally I can’t blame anyone who does what they have to do, to try to keep a job within mainstream institutions.

    https://undark.org/article/race-science-razib-khan-racism/

    The way Khan tells the story, he was caught off guard by the sudden rise of the alt-right, and by the extremist turn of Unz’s website. The day before I contacted him to request an interview, Khan announced that he was leaving The Unz Review. His new standalone blog, still called Gene Expression, launched in January. Over the phone, he told me that the move was partly because he wanted to be an independent blogger again, and partly because he had grown uncomfortable with some of the material on Unz’s site. He framed the issue as an image problem, not a moral one. “I wasn’t comfortable with some of the co-branding,” he said.

    Hadn’t Sailer and other Unz contributors been writing things like this for years? Khan said that he used to be more tolerant of those perspectives. “Obviously, I don’t condone it,” he said. When I observed that standing by silently — and even linking to Sailer’s work — seemed like the definition of “condone,” Khan hesitated. “In terms of being at Unz, I was probably there too long,” he said.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  233. Svigor says:

    Yet Africans are killing each other on a wholesale basis but their population growth is geometric bordering on the exponential.

    Yeah violent, existential conflicts are great for birthrates. It’s the non-violent existential conflicts that won’t get people off the couch.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  234. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    http://www.pewforum.org/2013/10/01/chapter-5-connection-with-and-attitudes-towards-israel/#prospects-for-two-state-solution

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/

    Only ~25% of Jews voted for Trump while ~12% of Jews think caring about Israel is not an important part of being Jewish. So presumably at least ~60%, being generous, of liberal Jews think caring about Israel is an important part of being Jewish.

    Now Katz is obviously not in that category, but it is funny (ha-ha kind) that all the scientists he could think of as needing to be knocked down are gentile.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion

    ~12% of Jews think caring about Israel is not an important part of being Jewish
     
    That 12% are objectively wrong. As would a Catholic be who failed to care about the Vatican.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  235. @Dave Pinsen
    In the event no one has made this point yet, this is another example of Trump being right. He said after Charlottesville that taking down Confederate monuments was only the beginning.

    Another thing he was proved right about this week (again) is the danger of welcoming refugees from Syria and other Muslim countries. It turns out that one of the perpetrators of the recent Tube bombing in London was a Syrian refugee.

    Trump is mocked for not reading much, but that's probably why he gets issues like these right: his innate common sense hasn't been clouded by politically correct books. It takes in-person lectures by 4-star generals and former Goldman Sachs executives to get Trump to see the emperor's invisible clothes.

    Trump had also been right when the media was ordering him to denounce the bomb threats against all those jewish community centers and Trump they might not be what they seem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  236. @Brutusale
    Yet Africans are killing each other on a wholesale basis but their population growth is geometric bordering on the exponential.

    What is it about Israel that makes so many Jews react in ways at odds with their superior intellects?

    I've got no problem with the Israelis doing whatever it takes to defend their territory, even those "occupied" areas. Just be straightforward about the means.

    I’ve got no problem with the Israelis doing whatever it takes to defend their territory, even those “occupied” areas. Just be straightforward about the means.

    And do you afford Palestinians the same deference?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Brutusale
    Absolutely.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  237. Tyrion says:
    @Anon
    http://www.pewforum.org/2013/10/01/chapter-5-connection-with-and-attitudes-towards-israel/#prospects-for-two-state-solution

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/

    Only ~25% of Jews voted for Trump while ~12% of Jews think caring about Israel is not an important part of being Jewish. So presumably at least ~60%, being generous, of liberal Jews think caring about Israel is an important part of being Jewish.

    Now Katz is obviously not in that category, but it is funny (ha-ha kind) that all the scientists he could think of as needing to be knocked down are gentile.

    ~12% of Jews think caring about Israel is not an important part of being Jewish

    That 12% are objectively wrong. As would a Catholic be who failed to care about the Vatican.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    The survey includes all Jews including nonreligious Jews and presumably those who have religious objections to the state of Israel.

    As would a Catholic be who failed to care about the Vatican.
     
    I'm afraid I can't resist: the Vatican is a hill.

    Catholics do care about the successor to the Chair of Peter. His temporal domains have however not been at issue since 1870 and those who invaded them then were also Catholics.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  238. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Tyrion

    ~12% of Jews think caring about Israel is not an important part of being Jewish
     
    That 12% are objectively wrong. As would a Catholic be who failed to care about the Vatican.

    The survey includes all Jews including nonreligious Jews and presumably those who have religious objections to the state of Israel.

    As would a Catholic be who failed to care about the Vatican.

    I’m afraid I can’t resist: the Vatican is a hill.

    Catholics do care about the successor to the Chair of Peter. His temporal domains have however not been at issue since 1870 and those who invaded them then were also Catholics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion

    The survey includes all Jews including nonreligious Jews and presumably those who have religious objections to the state of Israel.
     
    It does and care is a broad word. As is Jewish.

    The survey does not ask the respondents if Israel is important to them. To the many Jews to whom Judaism is of little value this question is merely one of fact.

    Furthermore, 100% of Jews would respond that caring about the environment was an important part of Judaism.

    You see this is why people like you are justly termed anti-Semitic. You irrationally see the worst about Jews in even as mundane a survey answer as this.

    Of course, Israel is important to Judaism, have you not read the Bible? It is almost entirely about the place.

    But really what can you draw from this? What madcap inferences will you be making next? That because oil company execs all answer that caring about the planet is important to them, that they are actually secretly conspiring to convert power gen to renewables?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  239. Tyrion says:
    @Anon
    The survey includes all Jews including nonreligious Jews and presumably those who have religious objections to the state of Israel.

    As would a Catholic be who failed to care about the Vatican.
     
    I'm afraid I can't resist: the Vatican is a hill.

    Catholics do care about the successor to the Chair of Peter. His temporal domains have however not been at issue since 1870 and those who invaded them then were also Catholics.

    The survey includes all Jews including nonreligious Jews and presumably those who have religious objections to the state of Israel.

    It does and care is a broad word. As is Jewish.

    The survey does not ask the respondents if Israel is important to them. To the many Jews to whom Judaism is of little value this question is merely one of fact.

    Furthermore, 100% of Jews would respond that caring about the environment was an important part of Judaism.

    You see this is why people like you are justly termed anti-Semitic. You irrationally see the worst about Jews in even as mundane a survey answer as this.

    Of course, Israel is important to Judaism, have you not read the Bible? It is almost entirely about the place.

    But really what can you draw from this? What madcap inferences will you be making next? That because oil company execs all answer that caring about the planet is important to them, that they are actually secretly conspiring to convert power gen to renewables?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    You see this is why people like you are justly termed anti-Semitic. You irrationally see the worst about Jews in even as mundane a survey answer as this.

     

    ?

    Furthermore, 100% of Jews would respond that caring about the environment was an important part of Judaism.
     
    ?

    Also Judaism != "being Jewish" when nonreligious Jews are surveyed.

    But really what can you draw from this? What madcap inferences will you be making next? That because oil company execs all answer that caring about the planet is important to them, that they are actually secretly conspiring to convert power gen to renewables?
     
    Are you sane?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  240. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Tyrion

    The survey includes all Jews including nonreligious Jews and presumably those who have religious objections to the state of Israel.
     
    It does and care is a broad word. As is Jewish.

    The survey does not ask the respondents if Israel is important to them. To the many Jews to whom Judaism is of little value this question is merely one of fact.

    Furthermore, 100% of Jews would respond that caring about the environment was an important part of Judaism.

    You see this is why people like you are justly termed anti-Semitic. You irrationally see the worst about Jews in even as mundane a survey answer as this.

    Of course, Israel is important to Judaism, have you not read the Bible? It is almost entirely about the place.

    But really what can you draw from this? What madcap inferences will you be making next? That because oil company execs all answer that caring about the planet is important to them, that they are actually secretly conspiring to convert power gen to renewables?

    You see this is why people like you are justly termed anti-Semitic. You irrationally see the worst about Jews in even as mundane a survey answer as this.

    ?

    Furthermore, 100% of Jews would respond that caring about the environment was an important part of Judaism.

    ?

    Also Judaism != “being Jewish” when nonreligious Jews are surveyed.

    But really what can you draw from this? What madcap inferences will you be making next? That because oil company execs all answer that caring about the planet is important to them, that they are actually secretly conspiring to convert power gen to renewables?

    Are you sane?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion
    Clearly you are not smart enough to understand that different people will have different perspectives on the same question. Your perspective on the survey question is very much NOT the perspective the vast majority of those answering would have had. This means that your understanding of their answers and its socio-political implications is entirely wrong. I tried to explain this at what I thought was your level. I condescended as much as I was able, but it seems to have not been enough.

    Basically, you don't understand the survey question and therefore don't understand the answers. This makes your and many of the other commenters' inferences sound ludicrously stupid to both those who happen to have the same perspective as the respondees and also those capable of understanding multiple perspectives at once.

    I suspect the above will fly right over your head and you will feel offended. You will thus react with an attempt at wit or something else so dreary I will give up. Please surprise me and I will chew down crow all day long.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  241. Brutusale says:
    @Opinionator
    I’ve got no problem with the Israelis doing whatever it takes to defend their territory, even those “occupied” areas. Just be straightforward about the means.

    And do you afford Palestinians the same deference?

    Absolutely.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  242. Tyrion says:
    @Anon

    You see this is why people like you are justly termed anti-Semitic. You irrationally see the worst about Jews in even as mundane a survey answer as this.

     

    ?

    Furthermore, 100% of Jews would respond that caring about the environment was an important part of Judaism.
     
    ?

    Also Judaism != "being Jewish" when nonreligious Jews are surveyed.

    But really what can you draw from this? What madcap inferences will you be making next? That because oil company execs all answer that caring about the planet is important to them, that they are actually secretly conspiring to convert power gen to renewables?
     
    Are you sane?

    Clearly you are not smart enough to understand that different people will have different perspectives on the same question. Your perspective on the survey question is very much NOT the perspective the vast majority of those answering would have had. This means that your understanding of their answers and its socio-political implications is entirely wrong. I tried to explain this at what I thought was your level. I condescended as much as I was able, but it seems to have not been enough.

    Basically, you don’t understand the survey question and therefore don’t understand the answers. This makes your and many of the other commenters’ inferences sound ludicrously stupid to both those who happen to have the same perspective as the respondees and also those capable of understanding multiple perspectives at once.

    I suspect the above will fly right over your head and you will feel offended. You will thus react with an attempt at wit or something else so dreary I will give up. Please surprise me and I will chew down crow all day long.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    I suspect the above will fly right over your head and you will feel offended.
     
    Above, below, what's the difference-- naturally no one can be smarter than a Jew! Not offended, just amused. How much time do you spend telling people how bored you are with concern about Jews? You're certainly more interested than me...

    Anyway, the point of citing the survey was that various Jewish commenters had suggested that it was unfair to cite Katz as an example of wackoism on Americo-European social issues but sanity on Israel because he didn't exhibit sanity on Israel; but the survey shows that these positions (I will assume you must be a wacko to vote for Hillary) are indeed combined in a number of people. These positions are inconsistent, as is apparent to everyone but the people holding both.


    I tried to explain this at what I thought was your level.
     
    Perhaps you should simply speak plainly and intelligently without worrying about other peoples' levels. You will find this makes your writing more clear.

    Finally, let's see if you, in turn, will be offended or amused: http://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-we-are-all-jew-ish-now/#comment-2026633 .

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  243. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Tyrion
    Clearly you are not smart enough to understand that different people will have different perspectives on the same question. Your perspective on the survey question is very much NOT the perspective the vast majority of those answering would have had. This means that your understanding of their answers and its socio-political implications is entirely wrong. I tried to explain this at what I thought was your level. I condescended as much as I was able, but it seems to have not been enough.

    Basically, you don't understand the survey question and therefore don't understand the answers. This makes your and many of the other commenters' inferences sound ludicrously stupid to both those who happen to have the same perspective as the respondees and also those capable of understanding multiple perspectives at once.

    I suspect the above will fly right over your head and you will feel offended. You will thus react with an attempt at wit or something else so dreary I will give up. Please surprise me and I will chew down crow all day long.

    I suspect the above will fly right over your head and you will feel offended.

    Above, below, what’s the difference– naturally no one can be smarter than a Jew! Not offended, just amused. How much time do you spend telling people how bored you are with concern about Jews? You’re certainly more interested than me…

    Anyway, the point of citing the survey was that various Jewish commenters had suggested that it was unfair to cite Katz as an example of wackoism on Americo-European social issues but sanity on Israel because he didn’t exhibit sanity on Israel; but the survey shows that these positions (I will assume you must be a wacko to vote for Hillary) are indeed combined in a number of people. These positions are inconsistent, as is apparent to everyone but the people holding both.

    I tried to explain this at what I thought was your level.

    Perhaps you should simply speak plainly and intelligently without worrying about other peoples’ levels. You will find this makes your writing more clear.

    Finally, let’s see if you, in turn, will be offended or amused: http://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-we-are-all-jew-ish-now/#comment-2026633 .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  244. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Jack D
    This is true. The English country gentry (Darwin and his crowd) had a strong and person interest in and contact with animal breeding which they generalized into their understanding of the world. Proper animal and plant breeding not only won horse races but it influenced the prosperity of your farm. It was well understood that civilized man had to carefully control this process and not just let nature take its course or else you would be back at the African village level of "prosperity".

    Today's feminist picks out a cat at the shelter and that is the extent of her contact with the animal world.

    convent schools

    Maybe not Nobel prizes, but:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Caselli

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocenzo_Manzetti

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelista_Torricelli

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fausto_Veranzio

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guido_of_Arezzo

    If you count the University of Bologna there’s also Marconi (and others).

    after about 5 minutes on wikipedia.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments are moderated by iSteve, at whim.


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation
Confederate Flag Day, State Capitol, Raleigh, N.C. -- March 3, 2007