The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Sailer in Taki's: The Threat to Jewish Prosperity
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From my new column in Taki’s Magazine:

The Threat to Jewish Prosperity
by Steve Sailer

December 13, 2017

There’s actually a sane, quite reasonable explanation for why so much of the media’s embarrassing levels of Trump Trauma and Putin Psychosis stem from Jewish paranoia.

In the latest of an endless series of incidents, the national press is in a tizzy over Republican Alabama senatorial candidate Roy Moore’s wife pointing out that their lawyer is Jewish. The wisdom of having a Jewish lawyer is, of course, a stereotype, so Southern Republicans aren’t supposed to mention it.

A few hours before that, in response to the latest Muslim attempt to blow up a Manhattan tourist attraction, verified blue checkmark David Rothschild tweeted:

Dear rest of USA,

Whatever we learn over next few hours, New Yorkers do NOT want you to restrict immigrants or harass Muslims due to incident in NYC. They are vital part of our economy & society.

Thank You!

New Yorkers

PS. Happy to talk about 35,000 killed by guns each year.

7:03 AM – 11 Dec 2017

I assumed this was an anti-Semitic parody account, but it’s not. David Rothschild is a good example of how 21st-century Jewish writers, despite the world’s potentially strongest critical thinking skills, increasingly lack the self-awareness to get the joke.

In truth, everyone of goodwill, Jewish and gentile alike, would profit from taking the time to think about the 20th-century events that make so many Jewish-Americans concerned for their futures.

And no, I’m not talking about the Holocaust.

Read the whole thing there.

 
Hide 302 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Which joke are the Jews are not getting?

    Read More
    • Replies: @RonaldB
    The joke is that we (people of Jewish background) are putting ourselves in more danger, the more Muslim immigration we continually advocate. This is illustrated by Malmo, the Swedish city inundated by Muslims, where Jews identifiable as Jews, are almost routinely attacked.

    I actually wouldn't use the term "joke", as there's nothing funny about it. "Paradox" is a better description.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. The blue check equals yellow star meme may well be Anglin’s best work.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. Jews are empathetic to People of Color and other marginilzed groups because they to have been on the receiving end of the white male’s evil

    what do white men contribute aside from theft, war, misery, cowardice, and greed? why did white males vote 75% for pedophile Roy Moore?

    I know you guys will accuse me of trolling but consider-ALL Men of Color pretty much agree with me

    Just read Leonard Pitts and see what the truth is

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    Just read Leonard Pitts and see what the truth is

    Tiny- How come no love for verysmartbrothas.com?
    , @fish
    Ohs Tinys…..not the berrysmrtborths thing agin….we'n had deh talk!


    - Lendert "Don't be liking Tinys be cheetin wit the borthas" Psssst
    , @Buffalo Joe
    Tiny, That's not who we are!
    , @Jake
    "ALL Men of Color pretty much agree with me"

    That is an overstatement, but it is basically true. And that truth is the reason that every honest Liberal/Leftist would be demanding that all Jews and 'peoples of color' and Mohammedans be saved by forcing whites to stay away from them. They are too precious to be forced to live in the same country as whites.
    , @Unladen Swallow
    White Man's evil? Was it white men or black men who committed genocide in Uganda, Equatorial Guinea, Burundi, Rwanda, Nigeria, Zimbabwe etc... What is crime rate in Jamacia or South Africa compared to lilly white Switzerland or Finland? Black murder rate in any country compared to whites living in the same country? Ducks in Glass Houses shouldn't throw stones.
    , @Dissident
    May I be so bold as to inquire where you reside?

    A non-white majority, non-white-ruled land, I'm sure...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. . In medieval Poland after the Mongols had massacred the urban middle class, the surviving Polish nobility invited in Rhineland Jews to provide numerate services such as tax-gathering and money-lending.

    Err, no. MOngols slaughtered thousands of people, but concentrated in one Polish region (Lesser Poland) and the overal percentage was probably not that big (it’s not like those regions were not raided by Yatzvingers, Ruthenians or fellow Poles from different region). The urban middle class survived and nobles too. It just Poland was developing quite fast and it needed every immigrant they could get hands on, and immigrants in medieval times were scarce resource. So, in addition to Germans, Armenians, also Jews were invited. After that, they were indeed invaluable because, well, they could do things Christians theoretically couldn’t – not necessarily because of religion, but because there were laws in place which already regulated what a guild can and can’t do and so on. For example, Jews were invaluable to nobles because taht would allow nobles to get their own merchants and handcrafters without needing to pay attention to city regulations and city laws.

    Anyways, it;s complicated, but mongols have nothing to do with it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Don’t know. None of this seems very rational. It seems very visceral. Trump, while obviously Jew friendly, has offered up a bit–very mild and wishy washy–of nationalism and this just sends a fair number of Jews into a tizzy. A nation belonging to its citizens!?! ‘effing Nazi!

    As i noted in a previous thread, while Jews are quite sharp and commercially savy, their social/political theorizing and ideological committments seem to come without much in the way of–or any desire to do–an empirical check. And Jewish attitudes around nationalism and especially immigration seems to be very visceral and utterly without any empirical grounding whatsoever.

    I don’t see Jews worried about quotas, i just see them super-annoyed that anyone is pandering to those flyover country hicks and questioning their narrative of minority/diversity/immigrant wonderfulness.

    Read More
    • Agree: BB753, rogue-one, NickG
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    He recognised Jerusalem as the Israeli Capitol.

    Jews hate him, hated him and will still hate him regardless.
    Whatever he does, Jews will still hate him.

    Methinks it's something to do with him being a 'strong character' but not the 'right type' of strong character for Jewish tastes.
    , @guest
    "None of this seems very rational"

    Welcome to politics.

    "It seems very visceral. Trump, while obviously Jew friendly, has offered up a bit--very mild and wishy washy--of nationalism"

    That's the Who/Whom thing. Jews in this country at least are likely to be leftists or at least vote Democrat, and Trump is objectively not on that side. Unless he's a double-agent. If you live in a Who/Whom world, either you're With Us or Against Us. One side or the other. And any little indication, wishy-washy or not, is enough.

    Nationalists have done the same thing with Trump. It's still not clear he's really on their side, despite the rhetoric. For one thing, we all know how long he ran in Establishment circles before jumping into populist politics. But they perceive he's on their side. And the Deep State appears to agree, which is good enough for me. Though of course some of the Establishment is working with Trump.
    , @Anonymous
    Trump is a loose cannon. Unpredictable and uncontrollable.

    Unpredictable: Mercurial character. Nice today but possibly mean tomorrow. You can never know.

    Uncontrollable: He gained the presidency by his own means, bypassing the usual Republican fundraising/campaigning machinery, as well as the traditional media. He can do as he pleases.

    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    As I noted in a previous thread, while Jews are quite sharp and commercially savvy, their social/political theorizing and ideological commitments seem to come without much in the way of–or any desire to do–an empirical check. And Jewish attitudes around nationalism and especially immigration seems to be very visceral and utterly without any empirical grounding whatsoever.
     
    Agree.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. I don’t think jews have anything to worry about. They’re perfectly capable of holding us to the exact opposite of their own behavior for an indefinite time.

    In fact, the bold impertinence of the narrative we’re supposed to believe in is its strength. It’s impossible to know where to begin when addressing it. When a normal person lies you zero in on the part of their story that’s untrue. But when faced with a mass of talk that floats over reality without being connected to it at any point, you just shrug your shoulders. There’s nothing to grab hold of.

    Read More
    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "There’s nothing to grab hold of."

    You could always grab hold of the throat of the person who is out to destroy you. It's bound to happen at some point.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. They are vital part of our economy & society.

    I would like it clarified: exactly when did “Muslims” become a “vital part of our economy & society” — I must have missed that — also just how “vital” are they? — say on a scale of 1 – 10.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Percy Gryce
    I do really wish we could have an empirical discussion about this. But, as Steve has pointed out, we lack the public language and categories for that discussion. Or perhaps we lack the will.
    , @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    I would like it clarified: exactly when did “Muslims” become a “vital part of our economy & society” — I must have missed that — also just how “vital” are they? — say on a scale of 1 – 10.
     
    They've stimulated enormous growth in our domestic spying apparatus and internal checkpoint industry.

    Do you really want to put these people out on the streets?
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    just how “vital” are they? — say on a scale of 1 – 10.
     
    Hmm, -1, at best.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    In other news, Swedish police recently thwarted a planned grenade attack on the main Swedish synagogue.
    No surprises to read that a gang of Muslim immigrants to Sweden planned the attack.
    The irony is, of course, that Sweden was a ‘safe haven’ for Jews throughout the tumult of the 20th century ….. and until quite recently. Sweden was never outright antisemitic. The new imported population is, however, and with a vengeance. Some of the biggest supporters and defenders of the massive Muslim immigration into Sweden are Jews.

    Unlike France, Muslims are not a ‘colonial legacy’. This makes the madness even more acute.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    If true, perhaps Sweden doesn't have enough Muslims.
    , @Jake
    It is Jewish desire for suicide that almost no Jews recognize, because they see it as Jews forcing the whites to pay for Christendom.

    Scandinavian Germans were savages going a-viking as their jobs. Over time, they were civilized by the Catholic Church and its emissaries, which provided them with a high culture that was Latinate.The Reformation allowed them to recover the Germanic pagan love of war for the sake of war, and for a couple of centuries, the Swedes and the equally Protestant re-paganized Germanic Prussians were per capita the most terrifyingly effective soldiers in the world.

    But rebelling against Christendom always leads a culture to decay, with its military might and economics the last to go. But everything worthwhile about the culture decays, because the culture has chosen slow suicide when choosing rebellion against Christendom.

    Swedish culture is in latter stages of suicide. That cannot change unless Swedes return to the ideas and allegiances of Christendom.
    , @Bill Jones
    It's a shame the Swedish police don't spend more time protecting White Swedish women, rather than immigrants.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. @AnotherDad
    Don't know. None of this seems very rational. It seems very visceral. Trump, while obviously Jew friendly, has offered up a bit--very mild and wishy washy--of nationalism and this just sends a fair number of Jews into a tizzy. A nation belonging to its citizens!?! 'effing Nazi!

    As i noted in a previous thread, while Jews are quite sharp and commercially savy, their social/political theorizing and ideological committments seem to come without much in the way of--or any desire to do--an empirical check. And Jewish attitudes around nationalism and especially immigration seems to be very visceral and utterly without any empirical grounding whatsoever.

    I don't see Jews worried about quotas, i just see them super-annoyed that anyone is pandering to those flyover country hicks and questioning their narrative of minority/diversity/immigrant wonderfulness.

    He recognised Jerusalem as the Israeli Capitol.

    Jews hate him, hated him and will still hate him regardless.
    Whatever he does, Jews will still hate him.

    Methinks it’s something to do with him being a ‘strong character’ but not the ‘right type’ of strong character for Jewish tastes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Nico
    The problem is Christian Zionism.

    If something could call into question the Covenant Theology nonsense of the idiots in "Bible-believin'" churches it would surely be that the clan those doctrines refer to that would rip out the second half of their Bible, refer to the Second Person of their God as "the great blasphemer" and vote the replacement of themselves and their children and the end of any place recognizable as the one they grew up in, all in a heartbeat.

    Alas, they STILL center their theology AND their votes on the material interests of said clan.

    Hopeless?
    , @jimbo
    No, I think it's more that American Jews are becoming more and more distant from the Hebrews who live in Israel. The longer they stay in (and defend) their own country, the less Jewish the Isrealis become. They are becoming just another kind of Goy, and that's why their support among secular Jews keeps declining..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eilDS0IKhLE
    , @kaganovitch
    It is secular Jews who hate Trump.Religious / observant Jews tend to like him. He won observant Jewish neighborhoods in Brooklyn by wide margins.
    , @utu
    There is no contradiction. Jewish ambitions are global. They think they won't be safe until they control the whole world. Yes, Jerusalem is important to Jews but whether it will become Israel's capital now or later it is a tactical issue of secondary importance. Jerusalem is slated to be the capital of the world anyway but the world must be conquered first.

    In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah. - Ben-Gurion, 1962
     
    Israel's Zionists often are parochial and shortsighted and it is them who are gaming Trump and trying to game Putin and toying with the New Right in Europe by at the same time sending them Muslims and promising protection if they are joined in the anti-Muslim "crusade". The New Right thinks that going along with Israel will help them to protect nation states in Europe from multiculturalism and immigration. Hungary, Poland and Czechia have exceptionally close ties with Israel. It helps them to resist Brussel and Germany. But these games that Israel plays do not happen because Israel really wants to have nation states in Europe that are free form multiculturalism and immigrants. The game is about isolating Germany and preventing linkage of Germany with Russia. This is the old inescapable American doctrine: maritime empire against land empires. At the same time one can imagine that Putin or Trump may hope that they can put a wedge between Zionist Parochial Jews and Globalist Elite Jews. Do they have a chance? Who is really playing whom?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. As a rule, in the United States (and other countries), being liberal is positively correlated with education and IQ, which does not say much for the role of education in improving politics. Non-Russian speaking Jews in the United States are the demographic which has been most programmed by over-education. (Although Jews outside the US, usually favor centrist politics for particular reasons – Muslim immigration in Europe; conflict with Muslims in Israel).

    Taxi drivers usually have more sensible politics than college professors. Countries with the most educated and high IQ populations (look at Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands), generally have the most liberal politics.

    There are exceptions like Israel or Japan – where this is a result of war (in the former case), or very high levels of nationalistic programming (in the former and latter case).

    Switzerland is another special case of a conservative, yet educated, population (although 1/4 of people in Switzerland are foreigners).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Samuel Skinner
    Those are bad politics- for the country. If you want to show how much better you are then everyone else or screw over poor people, they are great politics.
    , @dfordoom

    Taxi drivers usually have more sensible politics than college professors. Countries with the most educated and high IQ populations (look at Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands), generally have the most liberal politics.
     
    Higher education is like salt. Every country needs some, but not too much. A college education is probably required by five percent (at most) of the population. Anything over that figure and higher education becomes a liability rather than an asset for the nation.
    , @Curle
    “ where this is a result of war (in the former case), or very high levels of nationalistic programming”

    Or that neither country put themselves in a position of accommodating any significant population of minorities who, as with the US, have access to the means of distributing political theater on a mass scale and as a consequence can engage in nonstop hysteria campaigns that give the impression of requiring a response. Remove mass media and the ‘problem’ disappears.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. The new national anthem will be Alt Right Now

    This was a massive hit somewhere around the late 60′s when performed by the Jewish band Free.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
    Paul Kossoff, the lead guitarist, was half-Jewish. The rest were common or garden English, though Fraser undoubtedly had a lot of Scots blood.
    Don't expect much interest from Mr Steve. His interest in music only seems to be stimulated by the LA opera scene, The Clash and the later punk scene - though strangely he seems to have gone off Joe Strummer rather completely.
    He no longer does articles about the Great American or Otherwise Popular Song, usually referenced to a recent Mark Steyn article. Mr Steve used to have a high regard for Mr Steyn, his many talents, especially his apparent ability to retain an MSM slot and salary and hint at un-PC truths.
    This regard seems to have evaporated. When Michelle Malkin and Ann Coutts have bite the bullet and published on VDARE, there was no similar effort from Steyn. He is basically a Neocon MSM hack, as recent contributor Tobias Langdon has exposed.
    , @Anonymous
    That chap, second right, looks just the MGM lion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. AD, Jewish culture is so full of denial, obfuscation, misdirection, evasion, and other defense mechanisms designed to perpetually absolve Jews of guilt that by the time Jews have filtered anything through it, even they barely know what they’re thinking.

    But Jews should be worried about quotas. America seems far more likely to impose quotas on Jews, and everyone else, than to repeal Affirmative Action; following through and making the whole thing a strict quota system is an easy argument to make, uses poztard logic against phony poztards like Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel H
    >>But Jews should be worried about quotas. America seems far more likely to impose quotas on Jews,

    But "society" is not yet imposing quotas on Jews in admission to elite universities. Well in fact maybe there are quotas, in the sense that their is a floor of Jewish admittance that administrators dare not let the Jewish component fall through. Just look at the numbers. One doesn't need a degree in statistics to figure this out. Common sense, arithmetic and inference will carry the argument.
    , @Anonymous

    Jews should be worried about quotas.
     
    Jews will never, ever have to worry about quotas. When and if the issue of quotas rears its ugly head, Jews magically become Whites. Even if the quota for whites becomes only 10%, as it probably will, Jews will take all of those spots for themselves and that will still be more than five times their preponderance in the general population. Look no further than elite college admissions to see this phenomenon in action.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Steve, good piece, but the end seemed to have something missing. I was expecting something more to tie the Russian angle back into the preceding parts, but instead it seemed to end somewhat abruptly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    He reached his minimum length to get paid for a column, time to wrap it up.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. No, what they lack is called a survival instinct.

    What’s the Jewish strategy in a nutshell? ‘Hey lets import millions of Muslims who hate our guts so they can crush the goy, what can go wrong?’

    The only thing keeping Jews from becoming a fat, waddling(Jews tend to walk funny) target of opportunity are whites whom they hate beyond all measure. Really how long would Jews survive in a place like Niger or Mali? Not very as ethnics don’t really care about Jewish things. Even where whites still dominate the security services as in Europe there are nations where Jews are leavig because of the increasing violence directed towards them by Muslim imports.

    That said, NYC deserves what it gets in terms of terrorist attacks. 9/11 should have been a wake up call for those snobs but it wasn’t. Instead they went back to sticking their heads up their behinds and voted in a Communist mayor who hates the cops and white people. You can’t have sympathy for people like that at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    To my mind, it seems to be the in-born vicious type of Arab/MENA/Pakistani oriental type that openly seeks to harm/attack Jews.
    Other third world types - natural born grunts, if you will, as typified by Legions are vicious, by don't seem able to articulate a directed racial animus, for whatever reason. In other words, they're easy to keep 'barefoot and ignorant'.
    Blacks, however, can be persuaded to ally with the MENAs.
    , @Anonymous
    A lot of Jews think they did better under Muslim rule like the Ottoman Empire.

    I don't agree, but I have heard it stated by Jews that Christians (meaning White Christians) were much worse historically than Muslims.
    , @SimpleSong
    I think their main issue with the gentiles is they seem them as their only real competition. No other group is likely to knock them from their perch. Obviously blacks and browns are not competing for the same economic niche. Asians are to some extent but for whatever reason they are not seen as a threat (not sure if this is right or wrong), but whites (particularly Northern Europeans) are seen as a threat. Hence the demonization of Mormons, preppy Whites (Haven Monahan!), and rural Whites in the media; although since these are three very different groups they get attacked in different ways.

    Not a terribly smart strategy though; since whites tend to be much less antisemitic than blacks, Muslims, Mexicans, etc. And they provide the boots on the ground that make all this accumulation of capital possible, by maintaining order in ways large and small. So maybe it would be best not to undermine them. Just a thought.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Buy when there’s blood in the streets! That’s all the Rothschild wisdom I know.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The trouble is that a considerable proportion of world – particularly American Jewry – is still fighting the battles of 100 years ago.
    The atavistic bogeyman fear is of white European man. For whatever reason, the crushing defeat of Hitlerism and Germany etc, that particular ghost is seemingly laid. Perhaps ‘seemingly’ is the operative word, as the prospect of some type of Frankensteinian resurrection can never be totally erased from the conditioned neurotic mind.
    That said, just look at how white European man has fallen. He is quite blatantly run and pussywhipped by his womenfolk who lord it over him. Horror of horrors, an institutionalized racial caste system exists, but white European man is the dalit. The efficient and market dominant Chinese and East Asians have shit all over him. In all certainty his progeny will be in a minority in the womb of the nations which birthed him. Quite frank shitheads and fuckwits – intent on destroying him – run the EU.
    Government by Economist magazine etc.
    Yes, the atavistic bogeyman has been dealt a killer blow and is dying on his feet, although it takes generations to perceive it. The post 1945 culture changes, the fatal ‘Ace of Spades’ of the great Hitler gamble, have done their job.
    The current Jewish dilemma is adjusting to the new reality – and a future Muslim Europe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    In a purely Darwinian sense, the only competition Jews have in the contest for world dominion are European-descended whites. In countries where Jews have pushed for non-discrimination laws, Jews have risen up in the last 2-3 generations to run a lot of institutions in those countries and wrest power from the native whites, and they have tried very hard to extend their influence by interbreeding with the native white elite power families. Both the Clintons and the Trumps have Jewish son-in-laws, for example.

    The one thing Jews have against them is the very same interbreeding. There are a lot more whites than Jews, thus Jewish genes will be swamped and the Jewish character lost as they intermarry. The math is against Jewish genes. It doesn't help that Jews carry genes for higher frequencies of autism and virulent breast cancer, either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Bangladeshi cab drivers ARE a vital part of the NY economy. Have you ever taken a cab ride to the Upper West Side WITHOUT a Bangladeshi cab driver? I rest my case.

    Read More
    • Replies: @istevefan
    I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business. I mean you'd think a newcomer would be the last person you would trust to be able to take you to any destination in the city. I realize today with GPS it is not much of a problem. But immigrant cabbies have been dominating big city USA since long before the arrival of personal GPS devices.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. One could also make an equivalent argument that:

    0. Whatever may be the history of Europe, it is one of the least anti-Semite places in the world today.

    1. Muslims are pretty anti-semite.

    2. Importing large numbers of young, poor, sexually frustrated muslim men into Europe would increase crime & terrorism in general and anti-semitism in particular.

    3. If the muslims ever organize politically (assuming they have sufficient ability to), they possess or will soon possess enough numbers to change European foreign policy towards Israel. This will not be good for jews & Israel.

    4. And yet, Jewish elites, media, and religious leaders seem to be huge supporters of massive muslim immigration, Merkel’s boner and seem insistent on branding any anti-immigration movement as anti-semitic. This behavior seems not just wrong but frankly suicidal for them in medium and long term .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Of course, the very real and apparent danger is of Lefty European political parties symbiotically fostering further Muslim immigration.
    The lefty political parties need the Muslim votes to survive.
    The Muslims need to immigrate for their ethno/genetic self interest to survive.

    Thus we have the perfect confluence ofvsrlf interest dynamic. Rather like the alga and the fungus have been doing for countless eons.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    It's not that suicidal if you have an escape hatch, which Jews do.
    , @Sam
    If the Alt-Right's, by the way of Kevin Macdonald, theory about Jewish self interest is correct then these positions make little sense. As Paul Gottfried has pointed out it is more due to a weird and irrational animus directed against Europeans that took hold in the 60's. Therefore Europeans are always the great danger.

    By contrast in other countries not quite as shaped by the Frankfurt school you don't quite see the same schmalz on immigration.
    , @Anon
    Importing large numbers of young, poor, sexually frustrated muslim men into Europe would increase crime & terrorism in general and anti-semitism in particular.

    But it correlates well with raising millions of white girls on slut culture. Combination of slut culture and white guilt turns white females into sucker for Diversity.

    More wild men from non-West means more sexual choice for the sluts, and 'welcoming' them makes white girls feel self-righteous and morally superior.

    Suppose a bunch of I-dream-of-Jeannie-type Arabian women are coming to Europe with sexual frustration and willing to have sex with any white guy. I think a bunch of white guys would be holding up signs like 'Arab Women are the story of the bravery of love'.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9L4NVc4HJo
    , @Anonymous
    Of course, not all Muslims are Semites, but I'm thinking a greater proportion of Muslims are Semites than are Jews, and at any rate, Muslims certainly constitute the largest proportion of Semites in the world. Even if you consider ALL Jews, even Liz, MM, Luke Ford and Sammy Davis Jr. to be Semites, that now or ever have lived, it still is no contest.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Dear New Yorkers,

    Drop Dead!

    rest of USA

    P.S. Happy to talk about guns, as I have become interested in reloading equipment as of late, and also about people killed by vans, hammers and 2 x 4′s.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    people killed by vans, hammers and 2 x 4′s.
     
    Too funny: For a moment I thought you wrote "Vans, Hummers, and 4x4s" insofar as motor vehicles indeed kill 3,000 Americans every month and no one bats an eyelash.
    , @NickG

    P.S. Happy to talk about guns, as I have become interested in reloading equipment as of late
     
    My press is an RCBS Rock-Chucker. Way bigger than I need, as with rifle brass I neck size only.

    I learned the ins and outs of reloading to a fairly comprehensive standard about 20 yrs back from the ABCs of Reloading by the late Dean A Grennell. Still possibly the most engaging and agreeable bit of technical 'how to' writing I've enjoyed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Right now the US economy probably does not function without immigrants, and the alt right does not give much of a plan for correcting that. So he is right.

    If you want an example of what I mean look at Ajit Pai’s home town of Parsons Kansas. Son of immigrant doctors Pai is able to operate the commanding heights of government, can anyone else, living, from Parsons claim that? And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JollyOldSoul
    "And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is."

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven't expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration? Parsons, Kansas is 16.7% Latino. A decade before then it wasn't even half that. We need immigrant doctors so we can treat immigrant patients (many of whom don't even have health insurance). We need immigrant Muslims to spy on other immigrant Muslims (and their children) who want to kill us. Sounds like a great plan.
    , @istevefan

    And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is.
     
    Actually you know who needs South Asian doctors? South Asian countries do. According to the World Health Organization, the USA has 2.6 physicians per 1000 population, while India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have 0.73, 0.81, and 0.39 respectively.
    , @bomag

    US economy probably does not function without immigrants
     
    I notice that you hedged it with "probably".

    Maybe we can run this Grand Experiment again one day, only this time we leave out the demographic swamping level of immigration and use more natives.

    I'd certainly close with the deal of "fewer immigrants and less economy", which really would be "fewer immigrants = fewer parasites."

    Ajit Pai
     
    I can't help but think that his career was helped by affirmative action.

    There are talented immigrants, no doubt. But that gets leveraged into us importing a zillion zerglings that crush us under the sheer weight of their numbers.
    , @AnotherDad

    Right now the US economy probably does not function without immigrants, and the alt right does not give much of a plan for correcting that. So he is right.
     
    iSteve commenters should be able to do better. This "we can't function without immigrants" is one of those things that isn't even "arguable" or "complicated", it's just flat out stupid.

    First off the US did just fine--as in the leading global power--with very minimal immigration when I was a kid. In fact, life in the US was better for most folks, if normalized for economic progress (technological improvements, productivity improvements and corresponding increase in standard of living).

    Secondly it's just mathematically stupid. The "we need immigrants" is essentially an argument that there's something going on in the US where the economy just does not function as a closed system for labor. However, obviously *the world* is a closed system--both for labor and for goods and capital--and the world economy functions. These arguments are particularly stupid for the US which has something like 20% of the world's economy with 5% of it's land area and population and sports a reasonably high IQ, well educated and capable population.

    Arguments that a closed economic system doesn't work are just mathematically and logically stupid and incoherent. We are floating around on a big ball that is pretty darn closed economically.

    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    So you can see what the problem is.
     
    Yes we can. The problem is we do not have an immigration moratorium.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Regarding Moore, he is literally yesterday’s news, but I have to admit that the wife was hilariously naive. “Some of my best friends are Jewish” is the oldest cliche in the book. They have found this carved in hieroglyphics on the pyramids. You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America. That being said, I really liked her – she really appeared totally sincere.

    Also you need to watch the video – after she tells the press that her husband’s lawyer is Jewish she gives a little nod like “take that, you media!” She then mentions that they are friends with not only Jews but rabbis. That’s more than I can say – I have never met a rabbi that I would want to be friends with – I usually find them creepy and sanctimonious. The non-Orthodox ones are all flaming liberals and they are all interested in getting money from you. Well there was kind of a cool rabbi in my synagogue that I might have hung out with if he was my age (but he was much younger). But then they found out he had been sleeping with all the lonely divorcees in the congregation, so he’s gone.

    Then she mentioned something about “having fellowship” with her Jewish friends and rabbis. I don’t know what having fellowship in Alabama involves, but if it involves 14 year old girls and taking off all of your clothes then I want nothing to do with it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    It is a cliche, yes. The MSM is full of cool kids that know that response is lame, which causes them to laugh about it in the same way high school kids might laugh at a weird kid for wearing the wrong t-shirt. That's the level on which they're operating. "Look, America, these people aren't With It!"

    Wasn't so much a matter of them being racists, because they're from Alabama. That's a given. It became a big News Thing because they're so uncool.
    , @Vinteuil
    "...the wife was hilariously naive. 'Some of my best friends are Jewish' is the oldest cliche in the book. They have found this carved in hieroglyphics on the pyramids. You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America."

    Really? You think she lacked *self* awareness?

    No.

    What she lacked was *situational* awareness.

    She genuinely doesn't understand the insanely disproportionate role played by jews in American politics. She genuinely didn't understand that she *couldn't say that.*

    And who can blame her? Very few middle-American gentiles understand these things. And a big part of the reason for that is because the mass media doesn't *want* ...them to...notice.

    , @Jimi
    We've entered a parody phase of anti-conventional wisdom.

    Commonsense indicates that if you are accused of bigotry a effective response is to point out you have no problem with dating, socializing, and hiring people of all races.

    However if you use that as a defense today its considered proof you are racist. The "correct" response is to apologize, grovel and donate some $$ to the SPLC.
    , @AnotherDad

    Well there was kind of a cool rabbi in my synagogue that I might have hung out with if he was my age (but he was much younger). But then they found out he had been sleeping with all the lonely divorcees in the congregation, so he’s gone.
     
    LOL Jack.

    At least you can take pride that the clerics for your team are doing unclerical behavior that’s perfectly natural. When the clerics for my team go off the reservation they seem to prefer trying to convince 14 year old boys to perform unnatural acts.
    , @anon
    > You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America.

    Eh, it's just an embodiment of the cultural divide between big metropolitan areas on the coasts and (some) lifelong Alabama residents.

    The gulf is real. It's analogous to a person well versed in the internet/social media vs. someone who has only sparingly used the internet (thinking of me and my 69-year-old aunt). There are so many seemingly fundamental "baby" things that she just doesn't understand and these things simply cannot be explained/taught because they are so context dependent and interconnected.

    , @Dave Pinsen
    That little nod was the best part of it.

    There was another aspect of her little speech that set off lefties: she didn't say "One of our lawyers is Jewish" but "One of our lawyers is a Jew". Calling a Jew a Jew is a sort of a taboo, like calling a black person a black or a negro.

    I assume "fellowship" means praying. My girlfriend had an Episcopal priest (a former Russian Orthodox priest who switched teams because he was gay) who would pray with some orthodox Jews every week.

    But basically, a woman who sincerely professed her lack of bigotry was mocked for not being attuned to coastal, blue state mores.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. New Yorkers do NOT want you to restrict immigrants or harass Muslims due to incident in NYC. They are vital part of our economy & society.

    About as absurd as it gets.

    No one is “vital”; suggesting such just gives one a tool to order the rest of us around.

    I’m thinking of Sun Tzu’s dictum that maximum fighting effort comes with your back against the wall and no escape; I guess that is one reason to promulgate a narrative that we are ever precariously balanced on a precipice of genocide, and a holocaust is just one bad thought away from being ignited; constant vigilance and effort are called for, even if it means throwing every immigrant at hand against the alleged foe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    New Yorkers do NOT want you to restrict immigrants or harass Muslims due to incident in NYC. They are vital part of our economy & society.

    Okay, let's play the Jewish game. Let's praise and honor Muslims. Let's call for ending all wars to destroy Muslim nations. Let's stick up for the right of Palestinians. Let's call for BDS and let's denounce efforts to criminalize it. Muslims are so precious and valuable. We must stop favoring Jewish/Zionist interests over Muslim or Arab ones.

    Since Jews preach that Muslims are so very dear, let's play their game. Let's stop favoring Jews over Muslims, Israel over Muslim world. See how much Jews like that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Steve Sailer says:

    I assumed this was an anti-Semitic parody account, but it’s not. David Rothschild is a good example of how 21st-century Jewish writers, despite the world’s potentially strongest critical thinking skills, increasingly lack the self-awareness to get the joke.

    The Jews don’t get the joke and they will never change. Organized Jewry has too much power over immigration policy in the United States. Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer and Organized Jewry should not have a disproportionate control over immigration policy in the United States.

    Organized Jewry has joined with the old stocker WASP cohort to create the evil WASP/ Jew ruling class of the American Empire. Organized Jewry has exercised tremendous financial and political power in the United States for well over a century. The WASP/Jew ruling class pushes nation-wrecking open borders mass immigration, sovereignty-sapping trade deal scams, unnecessary overseas war, an Israel First foreign policy and globalization.

    Organized Jewry is a clear and present threat to the national security of the United States of America. Organized Jewry puts the interests of foreigners and the interests of Israel ahead of the United States.

    Jared Kushner, Paul Singer, Sheldon Adelson and many other members of Organized Jewry are enemies of the historic American nation. Organized Jewry operates in the same manner in every nation or region of the world where they have managed to steal their way into the ruling class.

    The WASP/Jew ruling class of the American Empire must be dislodged from power in order to defend the sovereignty and safety of the nation.

    MERRY CHRISTMAS!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. I wonder if there actually is such a thing as “critical thinking skills.” Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There’s no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking. It’s really more a matter of cultivated taste, as allegedly exists amongst wine connoisseurs.

    If you’re smart enough to take the Critical hatchet to everything, you’re smart enough to trick yourself into thinking stupid things. And it’s difficult if not impossible to be objective about it. Like when I’ve tried playing chess against myself, my instinct is always to subtly favor one side or the other.

    The scientific method is supposed to work because people who aren’t you check your work. People like David Rothschild probably don’t listen to people outside ones who agree with him, so he never gets to hear valid criticism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stebbing Heuer
    Critical thinking is essentially just asking questions - who, what, when, where, why, how - and not stopping until you are satisfied that you understand the important, if not all, aspects of what it is that you are interrogating.
    , @Stebbing Heuer
    My own definition of critical thinking:

    https://stebbingheuer.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/critical-thinking-what-is-it/
    , @NOTA
    Critical thinking is all about giving yourself tools to check your work, even when it’s giving you the conclusions you are sure must be true by all your instincts and upbringing and tribal assertions of faith.
    , @Anon
    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as “critical thinking skills.” Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There’s no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking.

    Sure such exists. But it's never objective. Critical Thinking always serves a bias, agenda, or perspective. Edward Said was a critical thinking but against Zionism and Western Imperialism.

    Critical thinking is more a tool. It's like hammer and nails are critical tools to a carpenter. But there's no guarantee what he will do with them. Build a church? Build a brothel?
    , @ThreeCranes
    Here's some "valid criticism".

    Might as well quote Wiki verbatim,

    "Gun violence in the United States is a major national concern that results in.........33,636 deaths due to "injury by firearms" (10.6 deaths per 100,000 U.S. citizens).[4] These deaths consisted of 11,208 homicides,[5] 21,175 suicides,[4] 505 deaths due to accidental or negligent discharge of a firearm, and 281 deaths due to firearms use with "undetermined intent".[4] Of the 2,596,993 total deaths in the US in 2013, 1.3% were related to firearms.[1][6] The ownership and control of guns are among the most widely debated issues in the country."

    So, 2/3rds of the deaths he's "happy to talk about" are suicides. And homicides roughly 1/3rd. And we all know the rest about who really is pulling the trigger so there's no point in reciting more. Anyway, he's deceitful right out of the blocks.

    Would he really happily deprive suffering people of their best option, the least painful way to end it all? How cruel is that?
    , @The Last Real Calvinist

    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as “critical thinking skills.”

     

    'Critical thinking' is like 'social justice'. Once you introduce the adjectives, you've left what's real and substantial and entered the realm of manipulation and social engineering.

    'Thinking' and 'justice' don't need qualifiers.

    , @ben tillman

    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as “critical thinking skills.” Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There’s no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking. It’s really more a matter of cultivated taste, as allegedly exists amongst wine connoisseurs.
     
    The second, and fourth sentences are completely false.

    Critical thinking is part of truth-seeking. How you can connect that to "BS"-ing or even taste is beyond me.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. @Jack D
    Regarding Moore, he is literally yesterday's news, but I have to admit that the wife was hilariously naive. "Some of my best friends are Jewish" is the oldest cliche in the book. They have found this carved in hieroglyphics on the pyramids. You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America. That being said, I really liked her - she really appeared totally sincere.

    Also you need to watch the video - after she tells the press that her husband's lawyer is Jewish she gives a little nod like "take that, you media!" She then mentions that they are friends with not only Jews but rabbis. That's more than I can say - I have never met a rabbi that I would want to be friends with - I usually find them creepy and sanctimonious. The non-Orthodox ones are all flaming liberals and they are all interested in getting money from you. Well there was kind of a cool rabbi in my synagogue that I might have hung out with if he was my age (but he was much younger). But then they found out he had been sleeping with all the lonely divorcees in the congregation, so he's gone.

    Then she mentioned something about "having fellowship" with her Jewish friends and rabbis. I don't know what having fellowship in Alabama involves, but if it involves 14 year old girls and taking off all of your clothes then I want nothing to do with it.

    It is a cliche, yes. The MSM is full of cool kids that know that response is lame, which causes them to laugh about it in the same way high school kids might laugh at a weird kid for wearing the wrong t-shirt. That’s the level on which they’re operating. “Look, America, these people aren’t With It!”

    Wasn’t so much a matter of them being racists, because they’re from Alabama. That’s a given. It became a big News Thing because they’re so uncool.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    Exactly. The whole gambit is that once they level the charge of Antisemitism - usually by some official media approved Jewish authority on the matter - everything you do in your struggle to deny the charge is just more evidence of the charge itself. They're just sadists sitting beside a quicksand pit, enjoying the misery of people they feel entitled to hate without reservation and broadcasting it to the like-minded.

    In a sane world, one's personal relationships would of course be evidence of one's non-racism, or that
    "racism" is a hopelessly broad concept that doesn't capture the complexities of human behavior.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. @Dmitry
    As a rule, in the United States (and other countries), being liberal is positively correlated with education and IQ, which does not say much for the role of education in improving politics. Non-Russian speaking Jews in the United States are the demographic which has been most programmed by over-education. (Although Jews outside the US, usually favor centrist politics for particular reasons - Muslim immigration in Europe; conflict with Muslims in Israel).

    Taxi drivers usually have more sensible politics than college professors. Countries with the most educated and high IQ populations (look at Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands), generally have the most liberal politics.

    There are exceptions like Israel or Japan - where this is a result of war (in the former case), or very high levels of nationalistic programming (in the former and latter case).

    Switzerland is another special case of a conservative, yet educated, population (although 1/4 of people in Switzerland are foreigners).

    Those are bad politics- for the country. If you want to show how much better you are then everyone else or screw over poor people, they are great politics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. I look forward to reading the article on Takimag, but I wanted to put this interesting thing out here, since it relates to some degree:

    I have twice wrote, in comments, the simple term for the people as described by Steve in the 1st word of this post’s title. I’m not trying to be silly here, so hear me out.

    Both those times, from the comment on iSteve, something triggered a bot to go completely through my site. The visitors log whose a systematic load of views of pages in the order you’d expect (i.e. starting from the 1st post, loading all internal links as they came up on a page, then skipping those ones on the way up through the pages) and close enough together to not be a human.

    The first time around, the IP number of all those hits was in Israel. The 2nd time, it was in the Washington, DC area. Yes, I have heard that it’s easy to spoof IP numbers, but I don’t know if that matters even here.

    Therefore, I am experimenting here, by not typing out one word today, and I will come back on tomorrow and type it. I will check visitor logs and compare. I am just interested in this, and it’s a zero-cost experiment. I am at heart an experimentalist, and, without much theory here, I’m like the non-beret-wearing member of the mythbusters. Thanks for putting up with this, Steve.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    My control comment resulted in nothing detectable (though I was not able to go back to the early morning) - I don't know exactly when my previous comment, that I'm replying to, got "on the web" though.

    OK, this comment is about Jews. That's all - I will look at the logs tonight. Steve, if you could keep an eye on the time that this got moderated into the system, it'd be appreciated. You can be a co-author, if we publish.

    Hey, I gots to know!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Anonymous
    In other news, Swedish police recently thwarted a planned grenade attack on the main Swedish synagogue.
    No surprises to read that a gang of Muslim immigrants to Sweden planned the attack.
    The irony is, of course, that Sweden was a 'safe haven' for Jews throughout the tumult of the 20th century ..... and until quite recently. Sweden was never outright antisemitic. The new imported population is, however, and with a vengeance. Some of the biggest supporters and defenders of the massive Muslim immigration into Sweden are Jews.

    Unlike France, Muslims are not a 'colonial legacy'. This makes the madness even more acute.

    If true, perhaps Sweden doesn’t have enough Muslims.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. @AnotherDad
    Don't know. None of this seems very rational. It seems very visceral. Trump, while obviously Jew friendly, has offered up a bit--very mild and wishy washy--of nationalism and this just sends a fair number of Jews into a tizzy. A nation belonging to its citizens!?! 'effing Nazi!

    As i noted in a previous thread, while Jews are quite sharp and commercially savy, their social/political theorizing and ideological committments seem to come without much in the way of--or any desire to do--an empirical check. And Jewish attitudes around nationalism and especially immigration seems to be very visceral and utterly without any empirical grounding whatsoever.

    I don't see Jews worried about quotas, i just see them super-annoyed that anyone is pandering to those flyover country hicks and questioning their narrative of minority/diversity/immigrant wonderfulness.

    “None of this seems very rational”

    Welcome to politics.

    “It seems very visceral. Trump, while obviously Jew friendly, has offered up a bit–very mild and wishy washy–of nationalism”

    That’s the Who/Whom thing. Jews in this country at least are likely to be leftists or at least vote Democrat, and Trump is objectively not on that side. Unless he’s a double-agent. If you live in a Who/Whom world, either you’re With Us or Against Us. One side or the other. And any little indication, wishy-washy or not, is enough.

    Nationalists have done the same thing with Trump. It’s still not clear he’s really on their side, despite the rhetoric. For one thing, we all know how long he ran in Establishment circles before jumping into populist politics. But they perceive he’s on their side. And the Deep State appears to agree, which is good enough for me. Though of course some of the Establishment is working with Trump.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @Jonathan Mason
    The new national anthem will be Alt Right Now

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siMFORx8uO8

    This was a massive hit somewhere around the late 60's when performed by the Jewish band Free.

    Paul Kossoff, the lead guitarist, was half-Jewish. The rest were common or garden English, though Fraser undoubtedly had a lot of Scots blood.
    Don’t expect much interest from Mr Steve. His interest in music only seems to be stimulated by the LA opera scene, The Clash and the later punk scene – though strangely he seems to have gone off Joe Strummer rather completely.
    He no longer does articles about the Great American or Otherwise Popular Song, usually referenced to a recent Mark Steyn article. Mr Steve used to have a high regard for Mr Steyn, his many talents, especially his apparent ability to retain an MSM slot and salary and hint at un-PC truths.
    This regard seems to have evaporated. When Michelle Malkin and Ann Coutts have bite the bullet and published on VDARE, there was no similar effort from Steyn. He is basically a Neocon MSM hack, as recent contributor Tobias Langdon has exposed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    Well, yes, however the band was also associated with founding father of British blues Alexis Korner who was half Jewish and who actually gave the band its name Free. I'm not sure what "Free" was supposed to mean in this context, but I guess it was a catchy name for a band and made possible album titles like Free At Last.

    Korner (born Koerner) was an interesting fellow who was a significant career influence on artists like Cream, the Rolling Stones, Jimmy Page, Robert Plant, and Rod Stewart.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. @Jonathan Mason
    The new national anthem will be Alt Right Now

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siMFORx8uO8

    This was a massive hit somewhere around the late 60's when performed by the Jewish band Free.

    That chap, second right, looks just the MGM lion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. On behalf of us downtrodden goys, I extend best Hanukkah wishes to our paranoid Jewish overlords.

    I knew a lot of Jewish kids when I was growing up. Among other things, I learned the lyrics to the obscene version of “Dreidel, Dreidel, Dreidel.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Rod1963
    No, what they lack is called a survival instinct.

    What's the Jewish strategy in a nutshell? 'Hey lets import millions of Muslims who hate our guts so they can crush the goy, what can go wrong?'

    The only thing keeping Jews from becoming a fat, waddling(Jews tend to walk funny) target of opportunity are whites whom they hate beyond all measure. Really how long would Jews survive in a place like Niger or Mali? Not very as ethnics don't really care about Jewish things. Even where whites still dominate the security services as in Europe there are nations where Jews are leavig because of the increasing violence directed towards them by Muslim imports.

    That said, NYC deserves what it gets in terms of terrorist attacks. 9/11 should have been a wake up call for those snobs but it wasn't. Instead they went back to sticking their heads up their behinds and voted in a Communist mayor who hates the cops and white people. You can't have sympathy for people like that at all.

    To my mind, it seems to be the in-born vicious type of Arab/MENA/Pakistani oriental type that openly seeks to harm/attack Jews.
    Other third world types – natural born grunts, if you will, as typified by Legions are vicious, by don’t seem able to articulate a directed racial animus, for whatever reason. In other words, they’re easy to keep ‘barefoot and ignorant’.
    Blacks, however, can be persuaded to ally with the MENAs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. The only thing keeping Jews from becoming a fat, waddling(Jews tend to walk funny) target of opportunity are whites whom they hate beyond all measure. Really how long would Jews survive in a place like Niger or Mali? Not very as ethnics don’t really care about Jewish things. Even where whites still dominate the security services as in Europe there are nations where Jews are leavig because of the increasing violence directed towards them by Muslim imports.

    I think it helps to see Jews not as hating Whites, but as having a master-slave view. White slaveowners liked happy, dancing, singing blacks who obeyed the rules and stayed on the plantation just fine; Jews like “goodwhites” just fine. It’s the uppity badwhites who read and do their own thinking (leads to uprisings) who are the problem. This is precisely because Jews see Whites as their natural hosts, and can’t survive without them in places like Niger or Mali. As for the Jews being forced to leave Europe, I suppose they’re mostly the conspicuous Jews who can’t give up the yarmulkes, sidelocks, black hats, or other Jewish traditions of no concern to the majority of Jews.

    It’s also worth pointing out that the White slaveowning class was just fine with more Black “immigration” from Africa; the demographic dangers didn’t really rate.

    Right now the US economy probably does not function without immigrants, and the alt right does not give much of a plan for correcting that. So he is right.

    “Right now the addict doesn’t function without his dope.” Yeah there’s a plan, it’s called detox.

    I’m thinking of Sun Tzu’s dictum that maximum fighting effort comes with your back against the wall and no escape; I guess that is one reason to promulgate a narrative that we are ever precariously balanced on a precipice of genocide, and a holocaust is just one bad thought away from being ignited; constant vigilance and effort are called for, even if it means throwing every immigrant at hand against the alleged foe.

    Yes, I’ve been saying this for years; psychologically, Jews get themselves into a place where they’re fighting the next genocide when it comes to racial issues, addressing Jewish power, etc. When you’re “fighting for survival” you don’t have to observe niceties like morality, honesty, or responsibility. (The slaveowner view is enabled this way; Jews must have Whites as host, it’s a matter of survival; Jews have an inborn right to have Whites as their hosts)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thea
    Both the Talmud & the OT teach that Gentiles will gratefully and willingly become slaves to the Jews. I've read rabbis that say we are different species and that Gentiles will love serving them. They will be doing us a favor.


    Given evangelical sycophants devotion to Israel, who can disagree?

    , @Anonymous
    "I think it helps to see Jews not as hating Whites, but as having a master-slave view. White slaveowners liked happy, dancing, singing blacks who obeyed the rules and stayed on the plantation just fine; Jews like “goodwhites” just fine. It’s the uppity badwhites who read and do their own thinking (leads to uprisings) who are the problem."

    Which is ironic, given that their morality and ethics arose as a 'slave' to the European master
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_morality

    They probably developed the inverted world view of the bottom being the top (ie.- the 'loser' is superior to the one who achieves) to psychologically cope with being at the bottom during points in their history. Other things suggest this as well. A matrilineal descent for the 'people ' perhaps because for a people who are losing, the women could still be counted on to reproduce whereas a male from a people at the bottom tended to be disfavored.

    Anyway, the foolish worldview has now become their Achilles heel, really. This distorted view of the world leads to all kinds of foolishness, much of which has serious consequences for them, like importing Muslims, supporting blacks who hate them, stirring up resentment against themselves by slapping the face of the majority, etc. Maybe it has been the source of being kicked out of country after country through the ages.

    Some of the tribe see through it and directly ignore it. But many if not most seem tied to it, and feel like they have to try to come up with a million and 1 little ways to justify their way around it (ways which fall flat on their backs with any serious reflection), perhaps much like the million and 1 little ways to get around religious rules. Not allowed to have keys on Sabbath? Well, lets incorporate them into our belt buckle, now they're just part of our belt buckle and not keys, you see. Not allowed to work equipment on Sabbath? Well, let's keep a Goyim on the payroll who just happens to want to sit around and do things for us that we need on the Sabbath. We are in favor of illegal immigration, just not for Israel, because, uh, Israel is a little country so can't have a big heart. Yeah! That's it. [Never mind that many European countries (like Sweden) being forced against the will of the people to take up Muslim 'refugees' have native populations of a similar size.]

    It's something we should exploit, because it's a gaping weakness. It's why they try to shut down all conversation that disagrees, because at the core of their belief system there is fallacy.

    , @The Craw
    "...Jews get themselves into a place where they’re fighting the next genocide when it comes to racial issues, addressing Jewish power, etc. When you’re “fighting for survival” you don’t have to observe niceties like morality, honesty, or responsibility."

    And almost as if on cue Jack D tells us in the very next comment:

    "Without Jewish brains and money, the jihadis might decide that their proper target is Jews and not whites in general. Would you prefer to be driving the bus or UNDER the bus? So far this is working, so who are you to say that this is not the right strategy?"

    Q.E.D.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Some of the stuff in the Takimag article is true, some is questionable.

    But they [Soviet leaders] tended to allow subordinates to discriminate against Jews in hiring and promotions, if they felt like it. Some did, some didn’t.

    In the Soviet Union, no one took any action except under the direction of the Politburo – it was called a centralized economy for a reason. No one did “what they felt like”. Also, did and didn’t wasn’t random. Moscow State University (their equivalent of Harvard) excluded Jews from its math dept. The Moscow Petroleum Institute ( a much less prestigious place) didn’t. Likewise, in most organizations there was a glass ceiling for Jews – you could get a job but not be promoted beyond a certain level.

    It wasn’t clear that they were in particular need of saving; rather, their careers were languishing under a Soviet system of affirmative action that tried to distribute the good jobs more broadly.

    Most Soviet Jews (except for the activists) were not in literal danger of their lives but they were being treated as 2nd class citizens (in a place that treated even 1st class citizens poorly). It wasn’t just a matter of quotas to limit Jews to their proportion in the population (such quotas are unfair anyway because while Jews might only be 2% of your overall population they are going to be 20% of your high IQ people) but in many cases (high leadership, Moscow University, etc. the quota was ZERO). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.1556.pdf

    Without Jewish brains and money, the social justice jihadis who are increasingly threatening Jewish prosperity would be seen as ineffectual clowns.

    Without Jewish brains and money, the jihadis might decide that their proper target is Jews and not whites in general. Would you prefer to be driving the bus or UNDER the bus? So far this is working, so who are you to say that this is not the right strategy?

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    The Politburo controlled every last detail in a country where bribery, larceny, shipment-lightening and an enormous black market were both normative and necessitated by the failure of the official economy?
    The Politburo controlled the hiring of individual secretaries?
    , @AnotherDad

    Moscow State University (their equivalent of Harvard) excluded Jews from its math dept. The Moscow Petroleum Institute ( a much less prestigious place) didn’t.
     
    I think this is the sort of "some did, some didn't" that Steve is referring to.

    Everything, every hiring decision in the Soviet Union was not taken at the Politburo level. (Merely subject to "correction" at the Politburo level.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @rogue-one
    One could also make an equivalent argument that:

    0. Whatever may be the history of Europe, it is one of the least anti-Semite places in the world today.

    1. Muslims are pretty anti-semite.

    2. Importing large numbers of young, poor, sexually frustrated muslim men into Europe would increase crime & terrorism in general and anti-semitism in particular.

    3. If the muslims ever organize politically (assuming they have sufficient ability to), they possess or will soon possess enough numbers to change European foreign policy towards Israel. This will not be good for jews & Israel.

    4. And yet, Jewish elites, media, and religious leaders seem to be huge supporters of massive muslim immigration, Merkel's boner and seem insistent on branding any anti-immigration movement as anti-semitic. This behavior seems not just wrong but frankly suicidal for them in medium and long term .

    Of course, the very real and apparent danger is of Lefty European political parties symbiotically fostering further Muslim immigration.
    The lefty political parties need the Muslim votes to survive.
    The Muslims need to immigrate for their ethno/genetic self interest to survive.

    Thus we have the perfect confluence ofvsrlf interest dynamic. Rather like the alga and the fungus have been doing for countless eons.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. @rogue-one
    One could also make an equivalent argument that:

    0. Whatever may be the history of Europe, it is one of the least anti-Semite places in the world today.

    1. Muslims are pretty anti-semite.

    2. Importing large numbers of young, poor, sexually frustrated muslim men into Europe would increase crime & terrorism in general and anti-semitism in particular.

    3. If the muslims ever organize politically (assuming they have sufficient ability to), they possess or will soon possess enough numbers to change European foreign policy towards Israel. This will not be good for jews & Israel.

    4. And yet, Jewish elites, media, and religious leaders seem to be huge supporters of massive muslim immigration, Merkel's boner and seem insistent on branding any anti-immigration movement as anti-semitic. This behavior seems not just wrong but frankly suicidal for them in medium and long term .

    It’s not that suicidal if you have an escape hatch, which Jews do.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Svigor
    Steve, good piece, but the end seemed to have something missing. I was expecting something more to tie the Russian angle back into the preceding parts, but instead it seemed to end somewhat abruptly.

    He reached his minimum length to get paid for a column, time to wrap it up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Tiny Duck
    Jews are empathetic to People of Color and other marginilzed groups because they to have been on the receiving end of the white male's evil

    what do white men contribute aside from theft, war, misery, cowardice, and greed? why did white males vote 75% for pedophile Roy Moore?

    I know you guys will accuse me of trolling but consider-ALL Men of Color pretty much agree with me

    Just read Leonard Pitts and see what the truth is

    Just read Leonard Pitts and see what the truth is

    Tiny- How come no love for verysmartbrothas.com?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Affirmative action is a problem for Jews. They repeatedly point out that Jews are not white to avoid the wrath of PoC. But when it comes to college admissions, Jews very much want to be considered Joe Blow white guy or gal.

    If Jews become a separte group than whites, there’s a danger that quotas will limit them to far lower numbers. Heaven forbid that they are treated like Asians whose numbers are limited to two or three times their percent of the population.

    Jews also might consider how gentile whites will feel if Jews push to become and, eventually, are officially considered non-white. It’d become a constant reminder that Jews aren’t one of us and, apparently, aren’t on our side. (Granted, influential Jews already aren’t on our side, but everyday whites don’t know this.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. @rogue-one
    One could also make an equivalent argument that:

    0. Whatever may be the history of Europe, it is one of the least anti-Semite places in the world today.

    1. Muslims are pretty anti-semite.

    2. Importing large numbers of young, poor, sexually frustrated muslim men into Europe would increase crime & terrorism in general and anti-semitism in particular.

    3. If the muslims ever organize politically (assuming they have sufficient ability to), they possess or will soon possess enough numbers to change European foreign policy towards Israel. This will not be good for jews & Israel.

    4. And yet, Jewish elites, media, and religious leaders seem to be huge supporters of massive muslim immigration, Merkel's boner and seem insistent on branding any anti-immigration movement as anti-semitic. This behavior seems not just wrong but frankly suicidal for them in medium and long term .

    If the Alt-Right’s, by the way of Kevin Macdonald, theory about Jewish self interest is correct then these positions make little sense. As Paul Gottfried has pointed out it is more due to a weird and irrational animus directed against Europeans that took hold in the 60′s. Therefore Europeans are always the great danger.

    By contrast in other countries not quite as shaped by the Frankfurt school you don’t quite see the same schmalz on immigration.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Steve’s analysis is generally solid, but I think he may be missing something here. Isn’t it possible that folks like Rothschild genuinely believe their pro-immigrant rhetoric?

    I’m not a liberal and I think, as Steve has pointed out many times, that importation of Muslims and other non-Western immigrants into the US will have a long-term negative effect on Jews and create otherwise avoidable problems for the county as a whole. It seems almost blindingly obvious to me, especially given the Jewish experience in France with Muslim immigrants. But when I discuss those points with fellow Jews, I get the standard “nation of immigrants” / “they’ll assimilate just like we did” talking points in response.

    Why don’t liberal Jews see the obvious danger in Muslim immigration? I’m a reform Jew and can say from personal experience that liberalism is part of the culture, including making its way into the religious educational process. Why liberalism is so intertwined with reform Judaism is another question, (probably an outdated reaction to right-wing antisemitism in 19th century Europe and the Holocaust) but its there.

    Take, for example, a well-educated influential Jew, like Steve writes about in his column. Odds are those folks had liberal parents, were taught liberal beliefs in synagogue, at the elite universities they attended, and then worked with primarily liberal co-workers, especially if they went into media or the academy. It’s not surprising they believe the same. Most people keep the same political and religious beliefs they are raised with. There doesn’t have be some self-interested or nefarious motive for that belief.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    But when I discuss those points with fellow Jews, I get the standard “nation of immigrants” / “they’ll assimilate just like we did” talking points in response.
     
    Jews could perhaps be forgiven some naivete in this regard if they also weren't simultaneously proponents of non-assimilation and of the positive value of "diversity" (insisting upon the most obnoxious elements of the immigrant's culture and demanding that the host adapt to them).

    I’m a reform Jew and can say from personal experience that liberalism is part of the culture, including making its way into the religious educational process. Why liberalism is so intertwined with reform Judaism is another question, (probably an outdated reaction to right-wing antisemitism in 19th century Europe and the Holocaust) but its there.
     
    I've known lots of Jews in all different capacities and degrees of observance (except Hasidim). I've even been in majority and overwhelmingly Jewish-dominated situations (summer camp and work). Maybe it's not uniform but there is certainly a palpable current of disgust for middle-American types. (In my experience Jews really let their hair down when they're numerically dominant). I think gentiles pick up on this (I did) as a thinly veiled chauvinism and hostility. It's not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.

    In my opinion the best thing that Jews could do at this point is to engage in a certain amount of self-criticism (I mean the sincere kind, not the pretext to criticizing others kind) and make an honest assessment of the cultural motivations behind their political involvement and particularly Jewish involvement in radical causes and movements and try to see how they're perceived by non-Jewish eyes. The current path of criminalizing noticing as Anti-Semetic is probably feeding into a false feedback loop which could lead to a catastrophic outcome that Jews won't see building on the horizon. This is the sort of thing that well-educated people who attended elite universities should be both open to and good at undertaking.
    , @Ian M.

    Isn’t it possible that folks like Rothschild genuinely believe their pro-immigrant rhetoric?
     
    Yes.
    , @Dave Pinsen
    If you're interested in Jewish motivations, I think a good exercise would be to try to differentiate them from non-Jews with the same politics. If you don't know any white gentile liberals, and your exposure to these sorts of views comes mainly from this blog, you may assume that believing (or, at least, spouting) obviously dumb and destructive ideas about immigration policy is a Jewish thing. But I know a German-American gentile New Yorker who has the same views on immigration. I don't know what he thinks of Israel -- that's never come up in our political discussions, which have been centered around Trump (I think I'm the only Trump supporter he knows, so he emailed me incredulous about how I could support Trump) -- but otherwise he's indistinguishable ideologically from a Jewish liberal.
    , @John Pepple
    Why should Muslims assimilate when Allah has guaranteed them that sooner or later they will be in control?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @guest
    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as "critical thinking skills." Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There's no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking. It's really more a matter of cultivated taste, as allegedly exists amongst wine connoisseurs.

    If you're smart enough to take the Critical hatchet to everything, you're smart enough to trick yourself into thinking stupid things. And it's difficult if not impossible to be objective about it. Like when I've tried playing chess against myself, my instinct is always to subtly favor one side or the other.

    The scientific method is supposed to work because people who aren't you check your work. People like David Rothschild probably don't listen to people outside ones who agree with him, so he never gets to hear valid criticism.

    Critical thinking is essentially just asking questions – who, what, when, where, why, how – and not stopping until you are satisfied that you understand the important, if not all, aspects of what it is that you are interrogating.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed. The only way to destroy Christianity is to destroy western civilization first. The goal, the prize Jews have their eye on is the destruction of the civilized world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D

    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed.

     

    Really? Where is this written?

    Your argument starts out with a totally false premise so everything that follows is equally false. The Messiah can come at any moment - maybe even today.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @guest
    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as "critical thinking skills." Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There's no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking. It's really more a matter of cultivated taste, as allegedly exists amongst wine connoisseurs.

    If you're smart enough to take the Critical hatchet to everything, you're smart enough to trick yourself into thinking stupid things. And it's difficult if not impossible to be objective about it. Like when I've tried playing chess against myself, my instinct is always to subtly favor one side or the other.

    The scientific method is supposed to work because people who aren't you check your work. People like David Rothschild probably don't listen to people outside ones who agree with him, so he never gets to hear valid criticism.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. W0w – remarkable piece – but it’s just a sketch.

    The role of the jews in American history since the Ellis Island influx is a story that needs telling, in full, by a dispassionate observer.

    This should be your second book

    Maybe you could call it One Hundred Years Together.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  47. @guest
    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as "critical thinking skills." Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There's no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking. It's really more a matter of cultivated taste, as allegedly exists amongst wine connoisseurs.

    If you're smart enough to take the Critical hatchet to everything, you're smart enough to trick yourself into thinking stupid things. And it's difficult if not impossible to be objective about it. Like when I've tried playing chess against myself, my instinct is always to subtly favor one side or the other.

    The scientific method is supposed to work because people who aren't you check your work. People like David Rothschild probably don't listen to people outside ones who agree with him, so he never gets to hear valid criticism.

    Critical thinking is all about giving yourself tools to check your work, even when it’s giving you the conclusions you are sure must be true by all your instincts and upbringing and tribal assertions of faith.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Luke Lea
    "Critical thinking is all about giving yourself tools to check your work, even when it’s giving you the conclusions you are sure must be true by all your instincts and upbringing and tribal assertions of faith."

    Critical thinking is easier to identify than to define. For example, it is what Pat Buchanan is doing in his book A Republic, Not an Empire. https://goo.gl/1KmTrV
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. What is the price to get rid of The Psychosis?

    Do we have to put Jewishly Cultured People into Matrix-like harvesting towers where they can dream their dreams of imminent pogroms forever while being managed by Mr. Smith (Mr. Smith will probably be Google-branded btw.)?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  49. The basic model is a genius trapped in tunnel vision and extreme short-term thinking. Because he’s a genius, he can generally make late and bad solutions work most of the time, and can rationalize away failures that would shake a more phronetically-connected person. That last point is a strong theme in Jewish biography: they make it to 85 or 90 and insist that some avant-garde insanity could have worked but the world was not ready yet, and, if they’re lucky, they transmit it to young people discovering rock music and marijuana. We never really defeat the Jews, but a Jewish sloppy stopgap is always colliding into a Jewish brilliant cocktail napkin scheme, so reasonable people with feet on the ground accidentally win. This unplanned collateral victory is frequently remembered by establishmentarian history as a nefarious conspiracy by evildoers cackling in moonlight.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. @Jack D
    Some of the stuff in the Takimag article is true, some is questionable.

    But they [Soviet leaders] tended to allow subordinates to discriminate against Jews in hiring and promotions, if they felt like it. Some did, some didn’t.
     
    In the Soviet Union, no one took any action except under the direction of the Politburo - it was called a centralized economy for a reason. No one did "what they felt like". Also, did and didn't wasn't random. Moscow State University (their equivalent of Harvard) excluded Jews from its math dept. The Moscow Petroleum Institute ( a much less prestigious place) didn't. Likewise, in most organizations there was a glass ceiling for Jews - you could get a job but not be promoted beyond a certain level.

    It wasn’t clear that they were in particular need of saving; rather, their careers were languishing under a Soviet system of affirmative action that tried to distribute the good jobs more broadly.
     
    Most Soviet Jews (except for the activists) were not in literal danger of their lives but they were being treated as 2nd class citizens (in a place that treated even 1st class citizens poorly). It wasn't just a matter of quotas to limit Jews to their proportion in the population (such quotas are unfair anyway because while Jews might only be 2% of your overall population they are going to be 20% of your high IQ people) but in many cases (high leadership, Moscow University, etc. the quota was ZERO). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.1556.pdf

    Without Jewish brains and money, the social justice jihadis who are increasingly threatening Jewish prosperity would be seen as ineffectual clowns.
     
    Without Jewish brains and money, the jihadis might decide that their proper target is Jews and not whites in general. Would you prefer to be driving the bus or UNDER the bus? So far this is working, so who are you to say that this is not the right strategy?

    The Politburo controlled every last detail in a country where bribery, larceny, shipment-lightening and an enormous black market were both normative and necessitated by the failure of the official economy?
    The Politburo controlled the hiring of individual secretaries?

    Read More
    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Jack D
    No, but if Moscow State University had an (illegal under Soviet law) policy of excluding Jews, you can be sure that it was approved at the highest level. Jews in the post 1967 Soviet Union had no problem being hired as secretaries, the problem was that they could not be hired as the secretary's boss.
    , @Whiskey
    Yes and the Akkadian, Hittite, and Assyrian Empires did much the same also Babylonia. Ultrea centralized planed pre monetary societies. Long history of such peoples.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @Jack D
    Regarding Moore, he is literally yesterday's news, but I have to admit that the wife was hilariously naive. "Some of my best friends are Jewish" is the oldest cliche in the book. They have found this carved in hieroglyphics on the pyramids. You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America. That being said, I really liked her - she really appeared totally sincere.

    Also you need to watch the video - after she tells the press that her husband's lawyer is Jewish she gives a little nod like "take that, you media!" She then mentions that they are friends with not only Jews but rabbis. That's more than I can say - I have never met a rabbi that I would want to be friends with - I usually find them creepy and sanctimonious. The non-Orthodox ones are all flaming liberals and they are all interested in getting money from you. Well there was kind of a cool rabbi in my synagogue that I might have hung out with if he was my age (but he was much younger). But then they found out he had been sleeping with all the lonely divorcees in the congregation, so he's gone.

    Then she mentioned something about "having fellowship" with her Jewish friends and rabbis. I don't know what having fellowship in Alabama involves, but if it involves 14 year old girls and taking off all of your clothes then I want nothing to do with it.

    “…the wife was hilariously naive. ‘Some of my best friends are Jewish’ is the oldest cliche in the book. They have found this carved in hieroglyphics on the pyramids. You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America.”

    Really? You think she lacked *self* awareness?

    No.

    What she lacked was *situational* awareness.

    She genuinely doesn’t understand the insanely disproportionate role played by jews in American politics. She genuinely didn’t understand that she *couldn’t say that.*

    And who can blame her? Very few middle-American gentiles understand these things. And a big part of the reason for that is because the mass media doesn’t *want* …them to…notice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    You are exactly right. She's behaving in exactly the way that MSM entertainment/propaganda has programmed her to behave, and it's only natural that the self-styled 'elite' snicker at this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @rogue-one
    One could also make an equivalent argument that:

    0. Whatever may be the history of Europe, it is one of the least anti-Semite places in the world today.

    1. Muslims are pretty anti-semite.

    2. Importing large numbers of young, poor, sexually frustrated muslim men into Europe would increase crime & terrorism in general and anti-semitism in particular.

    3. If the muslims ever organize politically (assuming they have sufficient ability to), they possess or will soon possess enough numbers to change European foreign policy towards Israel. This will not be good for jews & Israel.

    4. And yet, Jewish elites, media, and religious leaders seem to be huge supporters of massive muslim immigration, Merkel's boner and seem insistent on branding any anti-immigration movement as anti-semitic. This behavior seems not just wrong but frankly suicidal for them in medium and long term .

    Importing large numbers of young, poor, sexually frustrated muslim men into Europe would increase crime & terrorism in general and anti-semitism in particular.

    But it correlates well with raising millions of white girls on slut culture. Combination of slut culture and white guilt turns white females into sucker for Diversity.

    More wild men from non-West means more sexual choice for the sluts, and ‘welcoming’ them makes white girls feel self-righteous and morally superior.

    Suppose a bunch of I-dream-of-Jeannie-type Arabian women are coming to Europe with sexual frustration and willing to have sex with any white guy. I think a bunch of white guys would be holding up signs like ‘Arab Women are the story of the bravery of love’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Suppose a bunch of I-dream-of-Jeannie-type Arabian women are coming to Europe with sexual frustration and willing to have sex with any white guy.
     
    A brilliant and obvious corollary which will never, ever see the light of day in the mass media, for obvious reasons.

    And she hailed from Baghdad, of all places! How times do change.

    http://media.extratv.com/2013/05/27/i-dream-of-jeannie-340x440.jpg

    Yes, let's import us a few million of these (they don't even have to be blonde--we're liberal on that) and see how the equations shift.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @bomag

    New Yorkers do NOT want you to restrict immigrants or harass Muslims due to incident in NYC. They are vital part of our economy & society.
     
    About as absurd as it gets.

    No one is "vital"; suggesting such just gives one a tool to order the rest of us around.

    I'm thinking of Sun Tzu's dictum that maximum fighting effort comes with your back against the wall and no escape; I guess that is one reason to promulgate a narrative that we are ever precariously balanced on a precipice of genocide, and a holocaust is just one bad thought away from being ignited; constant vigilance and effort are called for, even if it means throwing every immigrant at hand against the alleged foe.

    New Yorkers do NOT want you to restrict immigrants or harass Muslims due to incident in NYC. They are vital part of our economy & society.

    Okay, let’s play the Jewish game. Let’s praise and honor Muslims. Let’s call for ending all wars to destroy Muslim nations. Let’s stick up for the right of Palestinians. Let’s call for BDS and let’s denounce efforts to criminalize it. Muslims are so precious and valuable. We must stop favoring Jewish/Zionist interests over Muslim or Arab ones.

    Since Jews preach that Muslims are so very dear, let’s play their game. Let’s stop favoring Jews over Muslims, Israel over Muslim world. See how much Jews like that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    The whole of the European liberal elite is already doing this. Have you never watched the BBC, or picked up a French or Spanish newspaper?

    The US is an exception insofar as there are also a number (albeit a declining number) of liberals who support Israel (in Europe, it is almost only conservatives who support Israel).

    , @Redman
    And don’t forget the $4billion yearly stipend for Israel. We could end that too and see what happens.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @Anonymous
    He recognised Jerusalem as the Israeli Capitol.

    Jews hate him, hated him and will still hate him regardless.
    Whatever he does, Jews will still hate him.

    Methinks it's something to do with him being a 'strong character' but not the 'right type' of strong character for Jewish tastes.

    The problem is Christian Zionism.

    If something could call into question the Covenant Theology nonsense of the idiots in “Bible-believin’” churches it would surely be that the clan those doctrines refer to that would rip out the second half of their Bible, refer to the Second Person of their God as “the great blasphemer” and vote the replacement of themselves and their children and the end of any place recognizable as the one they grew up in, all in a heartbeat.

    Alas, they STILL center their theology AND their votes on the material interests of said clan.

    Hopeless?

    Read More
    • Agree: dfordoom
    • Replies: @Jake
    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. Judaizing heresy always produces pro-Jewish politics and culture. WASP culture is the product of Puritanism. Oliver Cromwell allied with Jews to take their money granting Jews the right to re-enter England legally and even granting them rights and privileges denied to the vast majority of Christian natives of the British Isles.

    WASP culture as a whole, and not just the American Falwell or Swaggart type Evangelicals, is pro-Jewish and like Oliver Cromwell will sacrifice the vast majority of white Gentiles in order to promote Jews.
    , @RealRev
    Agree that xn Zionism is a problem. But you have your theological terms mixed up.

    Christian Zionism is part of a (fairly recent) theological system known as Dispensationalism. (Think Pentecostals, and baptists).

    Covenant theology (Think Presbyterians and Reformed) on the other hand is opposed to Christian Zionism and most books debunking xn Zionism are written by covenant theologians.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @J.Ross
    The Politburo controlled every last detail in a country where bribery, larceny, shipment-lightening and an enormous black market were both normative and necessitated by the failure of the official economy?
    The Politburo controlled the hiring of individual secretaries?

    No, but if Moscow State University had an (illegal under Soviet law) policy of excluding Jews, you can be sure that it was approved at the highest level. Jews in the post 1967 Soviet Union had no problem being hired as secretaries, the problem was that they could not be hired as the secretary’s boss.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @guest
    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as "critical thinking skills." Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There's no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking. It's really more a matter of cultivated taste, as allegedly exists amongst wine connoisseurs.

    If you're smart enough to take the Critical hatchet to everything, you're smart enough to trick yourself into thinking stupid things. And it's difficult if not impossible to be objective about it. Like when I've tried playing chess against myself, my instinct is always to subtly favor one side or the other.

    The scientific method is supposed to work because people who aren't you check your work. People like David Rothschild probably don't listen to people outside ones who agree with him, so he never gets to hear valid criticism.

    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as “critical thinking skills.” Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There’s no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking.

    Sure such exists. But it’s never objective. Critical Thinking always serves a bias, agenda, or perspective. Edward Said was a critical thinking but against Zionism and Western Imperialism.

    Critical thinking is more a tool. It’s like hammer and nails are critical tools to a carpenter. But there’s no guarantee what he will do with them. Build a church? Build a brothel?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @Anonymous
    He recognised Jerusalem as the Israeli Capitol.

    Jews hate him, hated him and will still hate him regardless.
    Whatever he does, Jews will still hate him.

    Methinks it's something to do with him being a 'strong character' but not the 'right type' of strong character for Jewish tastes.

    No, I think it’s more that American Jews are becoming more and more distant from the Hebrews who live in Israel. The longer they stay in (and defend) their own country, the less Jewish the Isrealis become. They are becoming just another kind of Goy, and that’s why their support among secular Jews keeps declining..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. “Whatever we learn over next few hours, New Yorkers do NOT want you to restrict immigrants or harass Muslims due to incident in NYC. They are vital part of our plan to replace you

    FTFH.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. ‘As Anti-Semitism Rises, ‘I Don’t Feel Safe in Australia,’ Rabbi Says’

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/26/world/australia/australia-anti-semitism-racism.html

    I wonder how safe the Rabbi feels in Anglo-Celtic Australian neighbourhoods versus Lebanese neighbourhoods…

    I wonder how safe he or his ancestors felt when they travelled half-way around the world to be in a much more blonde Australia. Because if I am to understand the logic, more white people = more white racism. Right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @dfordoom

    ‘As Anti-Semitism Rises, ‘I Don’t Feel Safe in Australia,’ Rabbi Says’
     
    I'd be happy to pay for his plane ticket if he wants to leave. I'll even drive him to the airport.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. @Jack D
    Some of the stuff in the Takimag article is true, some is questionable.

    But they [Soviet leaders] tended to allow subordinates to discriminate against Jews in hiring and promotions, if they felt like it. Some did, some didn’t.
     
    In the Soviet Union, no one took any action except under the direction of the Politburo - it was called a centralized economy for a reason. No one did "what they felt like". Also, did and didn't wasn't random. Moscow State University (their equivalent of Harvard) excluded Jews from its math dept. The Moscow Petroleum Institute ( a much less prestigious place) didn't. Likewise, in most organizations there was a glass ceiling for Jews - you could get a job but not be promoted beyond a certain level.

    It wasn’t clear that they were in particular need of saving; rather, their careers were languishing under a Soviet system of affirmative action that tried to distribute the good jobs more broadly.
     
    Most Soviet Jews (except for the activists) were not in literal danger of their lives but they were being treated as 2nd class citizens (in a place that treated even 1st class citizens poorly). It wasn't just a matter of quotas to limit Jews to their proportion in the population (such quotas are unfair anyway because while Jews might only be 2% of your overall population they are going to be 20% of your high IQ people) but in many cases (high leadership, Moscow University, etc. the quota was ZERO). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.1556.pdf

    Without Jewish brains and money, the social justice jihadis who are increasingly threatening Jewish prosperity would be seen as ineffectual clowns.
     
    Without Jewish brains and money, the jihadis might decide that their proper target is Jews and not whites in general. Would you prefer to be driving the bus or UNDER the bus? So far this is working, so who are you to say that this is not the right strategy?

    Moscow State University (their equivalent of Harvard) excluded Jews from its math dept. The Moscow Petroleum Institute ( a much less prestigious place) didn’t.

    I think this is the sort of “some did, some didn’t” that Steve is referring to.

    Everything, every hiring decision in the Soviet Union was not taken at the Politburo level. (Merely subject to “correction” at the Politburo level.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    You and he missing that the "did" and the "didn't" weren't at the same level. It's not like (if this had been America) Harvard didn't take Jews but Yale did. It's more like Harvard didn't take Jews but Bridgewater State University did.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @Jack D
    Regarding Moore, he is literally yesterday's news, but I have to admit that the wife was hilariously naive. "Some of my best friends are Jewish" is the oldest cliche in the book. They have found this carved in hieroglyphics on the pyramids. You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America. That being said, I really liked her - she really appeared totally sincere.

    Also you need to watch the video - after she tells the press that her husband's lawyer is Jewish she gives a little nod like "take that, you media!" She then mentions that they are friends with not only Jews but rabbis. That's more than I can say - I have never met a rabbi that I would want to be friends with - I usually find them creepy and sanctimonious. The non-Orthodox ones are all flaming liberals and they are all interested in getting money from you. Well there was kind of a cool rabbi in my synagogue that I might have hung out with if he was my age (but he was much younger). But then they found out he had been sleeping with all the lonely divorcees in the congregation, so he's gone.

    Then she mentioned something about "having fellowship" with her Jewish friends and rabbis. I don't know what having fellowship in Alabama involves, but if it involves 14 year old girls and taking off all of your clothes then I want nothing to do with it.

    We’ve entered a parody phase of anti-conventional wisdom.

    Commonsense indicates that if you are accused of bigotry a effective response is to point out you have no problem with dating, socializing, and hiring people of all races.

    However if you use that as a defense today its considered proof you are racist. The “correct” response is to apologize, grovel and donate some $$ to the SPLC.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Moore didn't say he would DATE Jews. At least Jews past the age of their bat mitzvah.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. @Tiny Duck
    Jews are empathetic to People of Color and other marginilzed groups because they to have been on the receiving end of the white male's evil

    what do white men contribute aside from theft, war, misery, cowardice, and greed? why did white males vote 75% for pedophile Roy Moore?

    I know you guys will accuse me of trolling but consider-ALL Men of Color pretty much agree with me

    Just read Leonard Pitts and see what the truth is

    Ohs Tinys…..not the berrysmrtborths thing agin….we’n had deh talk!

    - Lendert “Don’t be liking Tinys be cheetin wit the borthas” Psssst

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. @George
    Right now the US economy probably does not function without immigrants, and the alt right does not give much of a plan for correcting that. So he is right.

    If you want an example of what I mean look at Ajit Pai's home town of Parsons Kansas. Son of immigrant doctors Pai is able to operate the commanding heights of government, can anyone else, living, from Parsons claim that? And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is.

    “And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is.”

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven’t expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration? Parsons, Kansas is 16.7% Latino. A decade before then it wasn’t even half that. We need immigrant doctors so we can treat immigrant patients (many of whom don’t even have health insurance). We need immigrant Muslims to spy on other immigrant Muslims (and their children) who want to kill us. Sounds like a great plan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterike

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven’t expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration?

     

    Yes, but you also have the issue of who goes to medical school. A fair number of spots go to foreign students (number should be zero, by law). A lot of them stay here, where the medicaid fraud is easy, and the hiring preferences fat and juicy. But I wonder what percentage take their U.S. medical education and go elsewhere with it? Whatever that number is, it represents us shooting ourselves in the foot through stupidity.

    But the larger problem is that few coming out of medical school want to work in Podunk. Why? Because medical schools are the final step in the elite school process. And what kind of whites get into elite schools? Super SJW/SWPL whites. Therefore, the pool of white students applying to med school is already pre-selected to be majority SJW/SWPL whites, and they all want to live in Williamsburg. You don't have many Johnny and Jane Americans from Podunk even getting into the feeding system because of blatant, anti-white bigotry in elite schools. They don't want conservative, religious farm kids, so there aren't that many that get into med school in the first place that might want to go back and serve rural patients.

    PS - I was at a medical school not long ago. Asians all over the place, and even a few hijab wearing Muslim women. Ain't America grand.
    , @Dan Hayes
    JollyOldSoul:

    The American Medical Association purposefully keeps US medical schools below necessary requirement levels in order to have absolute control over the number of American medical students.

    The AMA knows that it would be practically impossible to terminate any operational American medical school while it would be relatively easy to control the flow of foreign practitioners. Its about AMA control of the number of physicians and absolute control at that!
    , @dfordoom

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven’t expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration?
     
    Could it have something to do with the fact that American universities are too busy teaching Gender Studies and similar nonsense and they just can't spare the resources to teach trivial stuff like medicine and engineering?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. I spoke with a right-wing rabbi in Israel who had an interesting theory which I will summarize and expand on:

    The Jews have been able to survive as a distinct people for thousands of years despite the oppression they suffered across the diaspora, precisely because of said oppression. The majority in each country never allowed the Jews to forget they were a (suspiciously) distinct people, and so they never did.

    By being such a largely welcoming and safe place for Jewish people, the United States is ironically a greater existential threat to The Jewish People. Modern American society views Jews first and foremost as American and White, so Jews have begun to see themselves as the same. And so we now have an intermarriage rate of 58% (71% among the non-Orthodox) and soaring assimilation.

    Ironically, if the rabid anti-semitism found in certain corners of the internet were to become mainstreamed into American society (as the alt-right seems to pine for) American Jews will begin again to see themselves first and foremost as Jewish, and fight-or-flight mode will kick in to overdrive.

    So my question to the Jew-haters in the comments section of Unz.com: are you hasbara agents or merely patsies?

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    Certainly outside oppression binds people together. That's KKK-razy Glue. But what is it about Jews that they get singled-out for oppressive team-building throughout history. The entire world single them out, why? Simple probability speaks against it.

    That being said, waiting for them to cease independent existence through assimilation is like waiting for black people to finally reach social and economic parity with white people post-civil rights. How long do we have to wait? When is it supposed to happen?

    It's been decades since the Gentleman's Agreement era, and still watching Americans put up flags on their own front porches gives Jews visions of gas chambers.

    When do they drop persecution paranoia and become us? Three more generations? A millennium?

    A poster above posted a clip from the Believer,which is about a Jewish neo-nazi. At some point in that movie, the main character changes tactics and advises his fellow anti-semites that the only way to conquer the Jewish people is to embrace them, openly and honestly. Let them into your hearts, and truly love them, with no guile. Which is something only a member of the outgroup could think up. "You cannot possibly defeat me. I'm special, because I'm me. The only way to beat me is to let me win."

    Nice try.
    , @dfordoom

    By being such a largely welcoming and safe place for Jewish people, the United States is ironically a greater existential threat to The Jewish People.
     
    Yep. In a perverse way Jews want to be hated. Their entire self-identity depends on it.

    Just as homosexuals want to be oppressed. Their existence as a distinctive sub-culture depends on it.

    Hatred is an excellent means of preserving group cohesion. Look at the Irish Catholics. For centuries the one thing that kept them going was their sense of being persecuted by the evil English. When the English stopped persecuting and oppressing them the Irish immediately began to commit national suicide.

    Christianity grew rapidly when it was persecuted, or when Christians believed they had real enemies who hated them. By the end of the seventeenth century the Islamic threat to Europe was over. Christianity immediately began to decline.

    The good news for Christians is that they now once again have enemies who hate them and want to destroy them - liberals. And it is increasingly obvious that liberals intend to start actively persecuting Christians. This may be the only thing that can save Christianity.
    , @El Dato

    The Jews have been able to survive as a distinct people for thousands of years despite the oppression they suffered across the diaspora, precisely because of said oppression.
     
    An ahistorical proposition, apocryphal.

    There are so many Jews because they liked to proeslytize heavily and openly. All this "thousands of years" and "diaspora" stuff is Star Wars level of bullshit.
    , @Discard
    I won't hate Jews if they stop hating me.
    , @Issac
    All true, but our ancestors also exercised self-inflicted separation in good times. The narrative of our diaspora is actually too reactionary. They have forgotten that we have to self-govern before we can govern. The radical dissolution movement is highly successful diaspora men and women begging to be governed because unlike Israelis they have never been introspective enough to accept their rank and role in broader society. They have, ironically, a more shtetle mentality than those of us who live in the shtetle nation. The solution is for them to understand that if they are to remain among the gentiles they must become a part of that society rather than its foremost opponents.
    , @ben tillman

    I spoke with a right-wing rabbi in Israel who had an interesting theory which I will summarize and expand on:

    The Jews have been able to survive as a distinct people for thousands of years despite the oppression they suffered across the diaspora, precisely because of said oppression. The majority in each country never allowed the Jews to forget they were a (suspiciously) distinct people, and so they never did.

    By being such a largely welcoming and safe place for Jewish people, the United States is ironically a greater existential threat to The Jewish People.
     
    I sounds like the rabbi's been reading Kevin MacDonald.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. @AnonCommentator
    Steve's analysis is generally solid, but I think he may be missing something here. Isn't it possible that folks like Rothschild genuinely believe their pro-immigrant rhetoric?

    I'm not a liberal and I think, as Steve has pointed out many times, that importation of Muslims and other non-Western immigrants into the US will have a long-term negative effect on Jews and create otherwise avoidable problems for the county as a whole. It seems almost blindingly obvious to me, especially given the Jewish experience in France with Muslim immigrants. But when I discuss those points with fellow Jews, I get the standard "nation of immigrants" / "they'll assimilate just like we did" talking points in response.

    Why don't liberal Jews see the obvious danger in Muslim immigration? I'm a reform Jew and can say from personal experience that liberalism is part of the culture, including making its way into the religious educational process. Why liberalism is so intertwined with reform Judaism is another question, (probably an outdated reaction to right-wing antisemitism in 19th century Europe and the Holocaust) but its there.

    Take, for example, a well-educated influential Jew, like Steve writes about in his column. Odds are those folks had liberal parents, were taught liberal beliefs in synagogue, at the elite universities they attended, and then worked with primarily liberal co-workers, especially if they went into media or the academy. It's not surprising they believe the same. Most people keep the same political and religious beliefs they are raised with. There doesn't have be some self-interested or nefarious motive for that belief.

    But when I discuss those points with fellow Jews, I get the standard “nation of immigrants” / “they’ll assimilate just like we did” talking points in response.

    Jews could perhaps be forgiven some naivete in this regard if they also weren’t simultaneously proponents of non-assimilation and of the positive value of “diversity” (insisting upon the most obnoxious elements of the immigrant’s culture and demanding that the host adapt to them).

    I’m a reform Jew and can say from personal experience that liberalism is part of the culture, including making its way into the religious educational process. Why liberalism is so intertwined with reform Judaism is another question, (probably an outdated reaction to right-wing antisemitism in 19th century Europe and the Holocaust) but its there.

    I’ve known lots of Jews in all different capacities and degrees of observance (except Hasidim). I’ve even been in majority and overwhelmingly Jewish-dominated situations (summer camp and work). Maybe it’s not uniform but there is certainly a palpable current of disgust for middle-American types. (In my experience Jews really let their hair down when they’re numerically dominant). I think gentiles pick up on this (I did) as a thinly veiled chauvinism and hostility. It’s not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.

    In my opinion the best thing that Jews could do at this point is to engage in a certain amount of self-criticism (I mean the sincere kind, not the pretext to criticizing others kind) and make an honest assessment of the cultural motivations behind their political involvement and particularly Jewish involvement in radical causes and movements and try to see how they’re perceived by non-Jewish eyes. The current path of criminalizing noticing as Anti-Semetic is probably feeding into a false feedback loop which could lead to a catastrophic outcome that Jews won’t see building on the horizon. This is the sort of thing that well-educated people who attended elite universities should be both open to and good at undertaking.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ian M.

    Maybe it’s not uniform but there is certainly a palpable current of disgust [among Jews] for middle-American types.
     
    This is also the case among the educated white gentile class.
    , @Jack D

    It’s not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.
     
    First of all, I don't think that "contempt for Christian morality" is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as "contempt".

    2nd, I think it IS a leap. In the mind of most Jewish liberals one has nothing to do with the other. They don't think of the US as a zero sum game so that giving opportunity to minorities and immigrants TAKES opportunity way from whites. This is the whole (false) premise behind "affirmative action" - you are just giving some oppressed people who remind me of my oppressed ancestors a helping hand, you are not trying to hurt anyone and in fact you are not hurting anyone because of all of the wonderful benefits that immigrants and diversity will bring to us. This POV may be dead wrong, but it is not meant maliciously. They really do think this way.

    3rd, there is no "long-term [Jewish] project to diminish the cultural dominance of the "host". Going back to George Washington's letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO "host". America is not the goyim's world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.

    If you want to make unfounded leaps in your own bigoted mind, then go ahead, but don't impose imaginary viewpoints on the Jews. If what you are saying is real, show me the minutes of the Elders of Zion where this "project" is discussed or it didn't happen.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @Anonymous
    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed. The only way to destroy Christianity is to destroy western civilization first. The goal, the prize Jews have their eye on is the destruction of the civilized world.

    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed.

    Really? Where is this written?

    Your argument starts out with a totally false premise so everything that follows is equally false. The Messiah can come at any moment – maybe even today.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas (hard at work)


    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed.

     

    Really? Where is this written?

    Your argument starts out with a totally false premise so everything that follows is equally false. The Messiah can come at any moment – maybe even today.

     

    Would you say that a Jew who is awaiting the True Messiah would have at least some motivation to debunk/expose a preceding False Messiah? Then let's say that Jew and his fellows had a few thousand years to think about it, and really stew about it because there was this really popular False Messiah who appealed even to lots of non-Jews. And then you wind up in the lands of these non-Jewish False Messiah followers, and not only are they sure their False Messiah isn't indeed false, they think you're the one in error for not recognizing him as the True Messiah! You might be fit to be tied!
    , @Ian M.
    I thought that Anonymous was joking.

    But in the case that he wasn't, most Jews don't believe in a literal Messiah any longer. Only the Orthodox, but they're not the ones influencing society.
    , @Anonymous
    He has already arrived. You are just to blind to see. You made a terrible mistake. It is not to late to ask for forgiveness and repent your sins against God.
    , @Anonymous
    Here you go. In this video a Jew rabbi is admitting white Christian Western civilization must be destroyed in order for the Jew messiah to appear.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZfiOmcipoI
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Jimi
    We've entered a parody phase of anti-conventional wisdom.

    Commonsense indicates that if you are accused of bigotry a effective response is to point out you have no problem with dating, socializing, and hiring people of all races.

    However if you use that as a defense today its considered proof you are racist. The "correct" response is to apologize, grovel and donate some $$ to the SPLC.

    Moore didn’t say he would DATE Jews. At least Jews past the age of their bat mitzvah.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Moore isn't going to date anybody, he's got a wife.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @eah
    They are vital part of our economy & society.

    I would like it clarified: exactly when did "Muslims" become a "vital part of our economy & society" -- I must have missed that -- also just how "vital" are they? -- say on a scale of 1 - 10.

    I do really wish we could have an empirical discussion about this. But, as Steve has pointed out, we lack the public language and categories for that discussion. Or perhaps we lack the will.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I used to think that Jews were just playing dumb, but I’m starting to think, that, in some issues (i.e. regarding Jewish behavior vs the rest of society), they really are dumb. Yes, dumb. They seem incapable of self-criticism, which is a mark of higher intelligence.

    https://forward.com/fast-forward/387372/what-does-fellow-white-people-mean-decoding-the-new-anti-semitic-alt-right/

    Read More
    • Agree: AndrewR
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  70. @Jack D
    Moore didn't say he would DATE Jews. At least Jews past the age of their bat mitzvah.

    Moore isn’t going to date anybody, he’s got a wife.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    I kid, I kid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @guest
    It is a cliche, yes. The MSM is full of cool kids that know that response is lame, which causes them to laugh about it in the same way high school kids might laugh at a weird kid for wearing the wrong t-shirt. That's the level on which they're operating. "Look, America, these people aren't With It!"

    Wasn't so much a matter of them being racists, because they're from Alabama. That's a given. It became a big News Thing because they're so uncool.

    Exactly. The whole gambit is that once they level the charge of Antisemitism – usually by some official media approved Jewish authority on the matter – everything you do in your struggle to deny the charge is just more evidence of the charge itself. They’re just sadists sitting beside a quicksand pit, enjoying the misery of people they feel entitled to hate without reservation and broadcasting it to the like-minded.

    In a sane world, one’s personal relationships would of course be evidence of one’s non-racism, or that
    “racism” is a hopelessly broad concept that doesn’t capture the complexities of human behavior.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @AnotherDad

    Moscow State University (their equivalent of Harvard) excluded Jews from its math dept. The Moscow Petroleum Institute ( a much less prestigious place) didn’t.
     
    I think this is the sort of "some did, some didn't" that Steve is referring to.

    Everything, every hiring decision in the Soviet Union was not taken at the Politburo level. (Merely subject to "correction" at the Politburo level.)

    You and he missing that the “did” and the “didn’t” weren’t at the same level. It’s not like (if this had been America) Harvard didn’t take Jews but Yale did. It’s more like Harvard didn’t take Jews but Bridgewater State University did.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    And if only there were some period in history in which "Harvard didn't take Jews"--in multiples of their proportion of the general population, no less--you might even have the beginnings of an argument. As it is, all you have is your fanatical, unreasoning tribalism.
    , @Brutusale
    During those times it was Bridgewater Normal School, training pedagogues. It's now just another shitty state school with delusions of grandeur, graduating barely-literate students. No self-respecting Jew would go near the place.

    That it's one of the largest colleges in America when it comes to turning out teachers just flabbergasts me. It's the reason Johnny, sorry, Juan Can't Read.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. @AnotherDad
    Don't know. None of this seems very rational. It seems very visceral. Trump, while obviously Jew friendly, has offered up a bit--very mild and wishy washy--of nationalism and this just sends a fair number of Jews into a tizzy. A nation belonging to its citizens!?! 'effing Nazi!

    As i noted in a previous thread, while Jews are quite sharp and commercially savy, their social/political theorizing and ideological committments seem to come without much in the way of--or any desire to do--an empirical check. And Jewish attitudes around nationalism and especially immigration seems to be very visceral and utterly without any empirical grounding whatsoever.

    I don't see Jews worried about quotas, i just see them super-annoyed that anyone is pandering to those flyover country hicks and questioning their narrative of minority/diversity/immigrant wonderfulness.

    Trump is a loose cannon. Unpredictable and uncontrollable.

    Unpredictable: Mercurial character. Nice today but possibly mean tomorrow. You can never know.

    Uncontrollable: He gained the presidency by his own means, bypassing the usual Republican fundraising/campaigning machinery, as well as the traditional media. He can do as he pleases.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Redman
    In some ways, don’t those qualities make him an effective negotiator and therefore national leader.

    I’ve heard the best negotiators in the business discuss the importance of unpredictability. Seems like a national leader should have the same qualities as a master negotiator under the international law of the jungle.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @AnonCommentator
    Steve's analysis is generally solid, but I think he may be missing something here. Isn't it possible that folks like Rothschild genuinely believe their pro-immigrant rhetoric?

    I'm not a liberal and I think, as Steve has pointed out many times, that importation of Muslims and other non-Western immigrants into the US will have a long-term negative effect on Jews and create otherwise avoidable problems for the county as a whole. It seems almost blindingly obvious to me, especially given the Jewish experience in France with Muslim immigrants. But when I discuss those points with fellow Jews, I get the standard "nation of immigrants" / "they'll assimilate just like we did" talking points in response.

    Why don't liberal Jews see the obvious danger in Muslim immigration? I'm a reform Jew and can say from personal experience that liberalism is part of the culture, including making its way into the religious educational process. Why liberalism is so intertwined with reform Judaism is another question, (probably an outdated reaction to right-wing antisemitism in 19th century Europe and the Holocaust) but its there.

    Take, for example, a well-educated influential Jew, like Steve writes about in his column. Odds are those folks had liberal parents, were taught liberal beliefs in synagogue, at the elite universities they attended, and then worked with primarily liberal co-workers, especially if they went into media or the academy. It's not surprising they believe the same. Most people keep the same political and religious beliefs they are raised with. There doesn't have be some self-interested or nefarious motive for that belief.

    Isn’t it possible that folks like Rothschild genuinely believe their pro-immigrant rhetoric?

    Yes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Jack D

    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed.

     

    Really? Where is this written?

    Your argument starts out with a totally false premise so everything that follows is equally false. The Messiah can come at any moment - maybe even today.

    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed.

    Really? Where is this written?

    Your argument starts out with a totally false premise so everything that follows is equally false. The Messiah can come at any moment – maybe even today.

    Would you say that a Jew who is awaiting the True Messiah would have at least some motivation to debunk/expose a preceding False Messiah? Then let’s say that Jew and his fellows had a few thousand years to think about it, and really stew about it because there was this really popular False Messiah who appealed even to lots of non-Jews. And then you wind up in the lands of these non-Jewish False Messiah followers, and not only are they sure their False Messiah isn’t indeed false, they think you’re the one in error for not recognizing him as the True Messiah! You might be fit to be tied!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    No, not at all. Non-Jews have always had false beliefs from the Jewish POV - they worshipped statues, calves, whatever. Non-Jews are not expected to abide by or believe in Jewish law which were given by God to the Jews via Moses, only by the Noahide laws which were given to the sons of Noah by God and thus applicable to all mankind. So that if you believe in a false Messiah or worship Mohammed or a goat or whatever is not an issue - you do your thing. This has nothing to do with the actual Messiah of the Jews one way or the other. Keep in mind that as a powerless minority from 70 AD onward, Jews were in no position to impose their belief system on anyone. Christians have an urge to convert the unbelievers but there is no Jewish equivalent. Jews were never interested in convincing Christians of the wrongness of their belief system. There was never a Jewish Inquisition in the Diaspora and even Israel has remained fully tolerant of other religions.
    , @Anonymous
    Here you go. In this video a Jew rabbi is admitting white Christian Western civilization must be destroyed in order for the Jew messiah to appear.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZfiOmcipoI
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @JollyOldSoul
    "And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is."

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven't expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration? Parsons, Kansas is 16.7% Latino. A decade before then it wasn't even half that. We need immigrant doctors so we can treat immigrant patients (many of whom don't even have health insurance). We need immigrant Muslims to spy on other immigrant Muslims (and their children) who want to kill us. Sounds like a great plan.

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven’t expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration?

    Yes, but you also have the issue of who goes to medical school. A fair number of spots go to foreign students (number should be zero, by law). A lot of them stay here, where the medicaid fraud is easy, and the hiring preferences fat and juicy. But I wonder what percentage take their U.S. medical education and go elsewhere with it? Whatever that number is, it represents us shooting ourselves in the foot through stupidity.

    But the larger problem is that few coming out of medical school want to work in Podunk. Why? Because medical schools are the final step in the elite school process. And what kind of whites get into elite schools? Super SJW/SWPL whites. Therefore, the pool of white students applying to med school is already pre-selected to be majority SJW/SWPL whites, and they all want to live in Williamsburg. You don’t have many Johnny and Jane Americans from Podunk even getting into the feeding system because of blatant, anti-white bigotry in elite schools. They don’t want conservative, religious farm kids, so there aren’t that many that get into med school in the first place that might want to go back and serve rural patients.

    PS – I was at a medical school not long ago. Asians all over the place, and even a few hijab wearing Muslim women. Ain’t America grand.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Keep in mind that a lot of American doctors educated at foreign medical schools (because US med school too hard to get into) so "doctors can only attend med school in their home country" cuts both ways.

    I don't doubt that there are farm boys in Iowa who have no desire to attend Harvard med school (which doesn't want them either) but almost every state has its own med school as part of its state university system (and law school, etc.) . If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren't that many who do. Either he would rather stay on the family farm or is not smart enough/hard working enough to get thru med school in the 1st place or if he is, after med school he wants to move somewhere that has better restaurants than Podunk and where he can make more $. So the choice of the good people of Podunk, KS is either Arjun as their family doctor or nobody.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @Anonymous
    He recognised Jerusalem as the Israeli Capitol.

    Jews hate him, hated him and will still hate him regardless.
    Whatever he does, Jews will still hate him.

    Methinks it's something to do with him being a 'strong character' but not the 'right type' of strong character for Jewish tastes.

    It is secular Jews who hate Trump.Religious / observant Jews tend to like him. He won observant Jewish neighborhoods in Brooklyn by wide margins.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @JollyOldSoul
    "And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is."

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven't expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration? Parsons, Kansas is 16.7% Latino. A decade before then it wasn't even half that. We need immigrant doctors so we can treat immigrant patients (many of whom don't even have health insurance). We need immigrant Muslims to spy on other immigrant Muslims (and their children) who want to kill us. Sounds like a great plan.

    JollyOldSoul:

    The American Medical Association purposefully keeps US medical schools below necessary requirement levels in order to have absolute control over the number of American medical students.

    The AMA knows that it would be practically impossible to terminate any operational American medical school while it would be relatively easy to control the flow of foreign practitioners. Its about AMA control of the number of physicians and absolute control at that!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @eah
    They are vital part of our economy & society.

    I would like it clarified: exactly when did "Muslims" become a "vital part of our economy & society" -- I must have missed that -- also just how "vital" are they? -- say on a scale of 1 - 10.

    I would like it clarified: exactly when did “Muslims” become a “vital part of our economy & society” — I must have missed that — also just how “vital” are they? — say on a scale of 1 – 10.

    They’ve stimulated enormous growth in our domestic spying apparatus and internal checkpoint industry.

    Do you really want to put these people out on the streets?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. According to David Rothschild Muslims would no doubt be vital economically and socially to all white countries, even in ones like Poland which don’t hardly have any Muslims yet. Muslims however, are not important to a certain middle eastern country that will remain unnamed.

    David Rothschild would have received a world-class education folks. Its on purpose. The naive idealism is just an act. Smiling malice aforethought. No matter how many stateside Rotterdams ensue, he will concoct an excuse that puts you in the wrong for even questioning.

    I’m glad Steve archived Rothschild’s tweet via the article.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  81. @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    But when I discuss those points with fellow Jews, I get the standard “nation of immigrants” / “they’ll assimilate just like we did” talking points in response.
     
    Jews could perhaps be forgiven some naivete in this regard if they also weren't simultaneously proponents of non-assimilation and of the positive value of "diversity" (insisting upon the most obnoxious elements of the immigrant's culture and demanding that the host adapt to them).

    I’m a reform Jew and can say from personal experience that liberalism is part of the culture, including making its way into the religious educational process. Why liberalism is so intertwined with reform Judaism is another question, (probably an outdated reaction to right-wing antisemitism in 19th century Europe and the Holocaust) but its there.
     
    I've known lots of Jews in all different capacities and degrees of observance (except Hasidim). I've even been in majority and overwhelmingly Jewish-dominated situations (summer camp and work). Maybe it's not uniform but there is certainly a palpable current of disgust for middle-American types. (In my experience Jews really let their hair down when they're numerically dominant). I think gentiles pick up on this (I did) as a thinly veiled chauvinism and hostility. It's not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.

    In my opinion the best thing that Jews could do at this point is to engage in a certain amount of self-criticism (I mean the sincere kind, not the pretext to criticizing others kind) and make an honest assessment of the cultural motivations behind their political involvement and particularly Jewish involvement in radical causes and movements and try to see how they're perceived by non-Jewish eyes. The current path of criminalizing noticing as Anti-Semetic is probably feeding into a false feedback loop which could lead to a catastrophic outcome that Jews won't see building on the horizon. This is the sort of thing that well-educated people who attended elite universities should be both open to and good at undertaking.

    Maybe it’s not uniform but there is certainly a palpable current of disgust [among Jews] for middle-American types.

    This is also the case among the educated white gentile class.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    EXACTLY!

    A group of filthy rich pure blood descendants of Boston Brahmins will hate and despise Middle American whites (Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox; all ethnicities) as widely and deeply as do any group of Jews.

    And it is not just a coastal thing. George Will is from the midwest, the small college town midwest, and he despises almost all non-rich Middle American whites. Will's contempt for deeply believing Southern Baptists is exceeded only by his contempt for deeply believing Catholics and deeply believing Eastern Orthodox.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    But when I discuss those points with fellow Jews, I get the standard “nation of immigrants” / “they’ll assimilate just like we did” talking points in response.
     
    Jews could perhaps be forgiven some naivete in this regard if they also weren't simultaneously proponents of non-assimilation and of the positive value of "diversity" (insisting upon the most obnoxious elements of the immigrant's culture and demanding that the host adapt to them).

    I’m a reform Jew and can say from personal experience that liberalism is part of the culture, including making its way into the religious educational process. Why liberalism is so intertwined with reform Judaism is another question, (probably an outdated reaction to right-wing antisemitism in 19th century Europe and the Holocaust) but its there.
     
    I've known lots of Jews in all different capacities and degrees of observance (except Hasidim). I've even been in majority and overwhelmingly Jewish-dominated situations (summer camp and work). Maybe it's not uniform but there is certainly a palpable current of disgust for middle-American types. (In my experience Jews really let their hair down when they're numerically dominant). I think gentiles pick up on this (I did) as a thinly veiled chauvinism and hostility. It's not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.

    In my opinion the best thing that Jews could do at this point is to engage in a certain amount of self-criticism (I mean the sincere kind, not the pretext to criticizing others kind) and make an honest assessment of the cultural motivations behind their political involvement and particularly Jewish involvement in radical causes and movements and try to see how they're perceived by non-Jewish eyes. The current path of criminalizing noticing as Anti-Semetic is probably feeding into a false feedback loop which could lead to a catastrophic outcome that Jews won't see building on the horizon. This is the sort of thing that well-educated people who attended elite universities should be both open to and good at undertaking.

    It’s not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.

    First of all, I don’t think that “contempt for Christian morality” is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as “contempt”.

    2nd, I think it IS a leap. In the mind of most Jewish liberals one has nothing to do with the other. They don’t think of the US as a zero sum game so that giving opportunity to minorities and immigrants TAKES opportunity way from whites. This is the whole (false) premise behind “affirmative action” – you are just giving some oppressed people who remind me of my oppressed ancestors a helping hand, you are not trying to hurt anyone and in fact you are not hurting anyone because of all of the wonderful benefits that immigrants and diversity will bring to us. This POV may be dead wrong, but it is not meant maliciously. They really do think this way.

    3rd, there is no “long-term [Jewish] project to diminish the cultural dominance of the “host”. Going back to George Washington’s letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO “host”. America is not the goyim’s world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.

    If you want to make unfounded leaps in your own bigoted mind, then go ahead, but don’t impose imaginary viewpoints on the Jews. If what you are saying is real, show me the minutes of the Elders of Zion where this “project” is discussed or it didn’t happen.

    Read More
    • Troll: AndrewR
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    First of all, I don’t think that “contempt for Christian morality” is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as “contempt”.
     
    As a preliminary matter, I note that you don't have any qualms about imposing Jewish morality on everyone else. You just pretend that Jewish morality is compelled as a matter of law and reason. Additionally, scruples about abortion is in no way exclusively "Christian" morality.

    But if Jews don't have contempt for Christian morality, they sure accidentally express something easily mistaken for it an awful lot. From Larry David shaking his schmeckel on an image of Christ to Billy Joel cajoling "good Catholic girls" who hide behind "stained glass curtains" for "starting much too late" these mistakes get made far too often. And Al Goldstein - what a Screw up! I'll have to just go to Portnoy's and lodge a complaint against him for his "mistakes."

    2nd, I think it IS a leap. In the mind of most Jewish liberals one has nothing to do with the other. They don’t think of the US as a zero sum game so that giving opportunity to minorities and immigrants TAKES opportunity way from whites. This is the whole (false) premise behind “affirmative action” – you are just giving some oppressed people who remind me of my oppressed ancestors a helping hand, you are not trying to hurt anyone and in fact you are not hurting anyone because of all of the wonderful benefits that immigrants and diversity will bring to us. This POV may be dead wrong, but it is not meant maliciously. They really do think this way.
     
    Well, they sure do see any proposal that would take opportunities away from Jews as Zero Sum. Artificially limiting whites in numerically-limited elite institutions by increasing the proportions of lower-qualified minorities - ABSOLUTELY KOSHER! Mere mentioning of the vast over-representations of Jews in elite institutions? Who are you, Hitler?

    I doubt that they "really do think this way." It seems more likely that they're both hostile and arrogant and think that no one else notices these patent contradictions with their goyische kopfs. Noticing - it's the worst of crimes!

    3rd, there is no “long-term [Jewish] project to diminish the cultural dominance of the “host”. Going back to George Washington’s letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO “host”. America is not the goyim’s world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.
     
    Thanks. I was looking for a new definition of Chutzpah and I think you've provided me with about as fine of one as I could have hoped to find.

    If you want to make unfounded leaps in your own bigoted mind, then go ahead, but don’t impose imaginary viewpoints on the Jews. If what you are saying is real, show me the minutes of the Elders of Zion where this “project” is discussed or it didn’t happen.
     
    How about instead I observe Jewish behavior and extrapolate backwards to the sort of thinking that would precede and instigate that behavior?
    , @Daniel H
    >> What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as “contempt”.<<

    There you go again. Abortion is not a religious issue. It is a public policy issue. It is no more germane to religion than the prohibition against murder is. This statement is a not to clever sleight of hand on your part. The fact that some Christian denominations oppose abortion and that some of the congregants of these denominations wish to construct public policy to restrict or ban abortion is mere coincidence.

    Judaism as understood by many Jews is very unlike Christianity. One could say that the religion of Judaism moral framework is based on what is good for the Jews, and Jews, for some mysterious reason, have fixated on the idea that regulating abortion is bad for the Jews. It is the Jews who are obsessed with abortion, not the goyim.
    , @Daniel H
    >>We are all partners in the American project.......

    There is no American "project". There is no American "experiment". Have you ever heard of a Chinese, Mexican, Brazilian, French or Israeli project? Oh, I know, magic dirt.

    There used to be an American nation. Substantially, there still is one but it has been eclipsed by the American imperium. As went all empires, the American empire too will end in the "dust bin of history".
    , @dfordoom

    What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else.
     
    Opposing abortion has nothing to do with Christian morality. I'm an atheist and I'm against abortion.
    , @Anonymous
    This sort of hysterical and paranoid hand waving tends to confirm Alec's thesis, in practically every detail. Not sure if that was your purpose, Jack.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    The only thing that really bugs me about the Jews is that they can’t spend 5 minutes out of the limelight without thinking it’s the end of the world. They’re the world’s worst drama queens. It’s always drama, drama, drama, full-blown hysterical fit, more drama piled on drama, etc., of the most childish sort. Jews generate it the way other people breathe. If they don’t get attention, they’re ready to die. They’re always fighting for the spotlight no matter what.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  84. @Anon
    New Yorkers do NOT want you to restrict immigrants or harass Muslims due to incident in NYC. They are vital part of our economy & society.

    Okay, let's play the Jewish game. Let's praise and honor Muslims. Let's call for ending all wars to destroy Muslim nations. Let's stick up for the right of Palestinians. Let's call for BDS and let's denounce efforts to criminalize it. Muslims are so precious and valuable. We must stop favoring Jewish/Zionist interests over Muslim or Arab ones.

    Since Jews preach that Muslims are so very dear, let's play their game. Let's stop favoring Jews over Muslims, Israel over Muslim world. See how much Jews like that.

    The whole of the European liberal elite is already doing this. Have you never watched the BBC, or picked up a French or Spanish newspaper?

    The US is an exception insofar as there are also a number (albeit a declining number) of liberals who support Israel (in Europe, it is almost only conservatives who support Israel).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    The whole of the European liberal elite is already doing this. Have you never watched the BBC, or picked up a French or Spanish newspaper?

    But and it's a very big but, when push comes to shove, they are right behind the US in supporting Israel and condemning Iran and Russia.

    Action speaks louder than words.

    It's like Saudis. Always bitching about justice for Palestinians, but always working with Israel under the table.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Jack D

    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed.

     

    Really? Where is this written?

    Your argument starts out with a totally false premise so everything that follows is equally false. The Messiah can come at any moment - maybe even today.

    I thought that Anonymous was joking.

    But in the case that he wasn’t, most Jews don’t believe in a literal Messiah any longer. Only the Orthodox, but they’re not the ones influencing society.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. @Tiny Duck
    Jews are empathetic to People of Color and other marginilzed groups because they to have been on the receiving end of the white male's evil

    what do white men contribute aside from theft, war, misery, cowardice, and greed? why did white males vote 75% for pedophile Roy Moore?

    I know you guys will accuse me of trolling but consider-ALL Men of Color pretty much agree with me

    Just read Leonard Pitts and see what the truth is

    Tiny, That’s not who we are!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. @Random Lurker
    I spoke with a right-wing rabbi in Israel who had an interesting theory which I will summarize and expand on:

    The Jews have been able to survive as a distinct people for thousands of years despite the oppression they suffered across the diaspora, precisely because of said oppression. The majority in each country never allowed the Jews to forget they were a (suspiciously) distinct people, and so they never did.

    By being such a largely welcoming and safe place for Jewish people, the United States is ironically a greater existential threat to The Jewish People. Modern American society views Jews first and foremost as American and White, so Jews have begun to see themselves as the same. And so we now have an intermarriage rate of 58% (71% among the non-Orthodox) and soaring assimilation.

    Ironically, if the rabid anti-semitism found in certain corners of the internet were to become mainstreamed into American society (as the alt-right seems to pine for) American Jews will begin again to see themselves first and foremost as Jewish, and fight-or-flight mode will kick in to overdrive.

    So my question to the Jew-haters in the comments section of Unz.com: are you hasbara agents or merely patsies?

    Certainly outside oppression binds people together. That’s KKK-razy Glue. But what is it about Jews that they get singled-out for oppressive team-building throughout history. The entire world single them out, why? Simple probability speaks against it.

    That being said, waiting for them to cease independent existence through assimilation is like waiting for black people to finally reach social and economic parity with white people post-civil rights. How long do we have to wait? When is it supposed to happen?

    It’s been decades since the Gentleman’s Agreement era, and still watching Americans put up flags on their own front porches gives Jews visions of gas chambers.

    When do they drop persecution paranoia and become us? Three more generations? A millennium?

    A poster above posted a clip from the Believer,which is about a Jewish neo-nazi. At some point in that movie, the main character changes tactics and advises his fellow anti-semites that the only way to conquer the Jewish people is to embrace them, openly and honestly. Let them into your hearts, and truly love them, with no guile. Which is something only a member of the outgroup could think up. “You cannot possibly defeat me. I’m special, because I’m me. The only way to beat me is to let me win.”

    Nice try.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    The trouble is that a considerable proportion of world - particularly American Jewry - is still fighting the battles of 100 years ago.
    The atavistic bogeyman fear is of white European man. For whatever reason, the crushing defeat of Hitlerism and Germany etc, that particular ghost is seemingly laid. Perhaps 'seemingly' is the operative word, as the prospect of some type of Frankensteinian resurrection can never be totally erased from the conditioned neurotic mind.
    That said, just look at how white European man has fallen. He is quite blatantly run and pussywhipped by his womenfolk who lord it over him. Horror of horrors, an institutionalized racial caste system exists, but white European man is the dalit. The efficient and market dominant Chinese and East Asians have shit all over him. In all certainty his progeny will be in a minority in the womb of the nations which birthed him. Quite frank shitheads and fuckwits - intent on destroying him - run the EU.
    Government by Economist magazine etc.
    Yes, the atavistic bogeyman has been dealt a killer blow and is dying on his feet, although it takes generations to perceive it. The post 1945 culture changes, the fatal 'Ace of Spades' of the great Hitler gamble, have done their job.
    The current Jewish dilemma is adjusting to the new reality - and a future Muslim Europe.

    In a purely Darwinian sense, the only competition Jews have in the contest for world dominion are European-descended whites. In countries where Jews have pushed for non-discrimination laws, Jews have risen up in the last 2-3 generations to run a lot of institutions in those countries and wrest power from the native whites, and they have tried very hard to extend their influence by interbreeding with the native white elite power families. Both the Clintons and the Trumps have Jewish son-in-laws, for example.

    The one thing Jews have against them is the very same interbreeding. There are a lot more whites than Jews, thus Jewish genes will be swamped and the Jewish character lost as they intermarry. The math is against Jewish genes. It doesn’t help that Jews carry genes for higher frequencies of autism and virulent breast cancer, either.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The preferred nomenclature is...
    Add in the fact many of the successful, non-religious ones aren't spawning any offspring either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. In the bigger picture (and it pains me to say it) I think most Western democracies are done. Kaput. Effectively over and only waiting to be garbage collected and replaced. This sounds awfully radical- it may SEEM America has been around forever and will prove more eternal than Rome (Fukuyama’s end of history and all that), but from a comparative perspective it is on par with the lifecycle of classical Greek democracies and seems to be following the same end-game- a ‘golden age’ period of effervescence followed by a slide into degeneracy as smart sociopaths (just like the sophists in Socrates’s day) game the system for all its short-term worth. All the flaws of the democratic model that Aristotle and Machiavelli identified so long ago are coming to the fore now. I see no real difference between the current ‘invite the world’ vote-farming gimmick which pretty much all left-of-center parties in the most ADVANCED Western democracies now exploit to the hilt, and classical Greek polis tactic of appealing to invaders (Athens if your faction is ‘democratic’, Sparta if it is oligarchic) to settle internal political squabbles (and provide the necessary muscle to expropriate, exile and maybe massacre your internal enemies). I do not see this ending well unless open borders insanity comes to a halt real soon.

    More on-topic, the problem we have is that we are now a cowardocracy. Think of the wealthiest, most famous, most influential dudes in America now- Buffett, Gates, Brin, Zuckerberg, Bezos. Isn’t it amazing that not one of them ever served in the military (I may be wrong on Buffett given his age and the existence of the draft in the 50′s, but I see no record of it on Wikipedia)? Isn’t it amazing that it’s almost impossible to imagine any of them even getting into a fistfight, let alone winning one? I’m not pushing forward some Hemingway-esque caricature of boxing/safari/deepwater fishing masculinity (and given that Hemingway was so fixated on this, he really was a beta at heart). I’m just saying it’s quite remarkable and historically anomalous almost none of our national elites have a martial background given that the PRIMARY duty of a national elite is to stave off foreign encroachment? And that not having said martial background, they have none of the martial virtues like bravery, honor, resilience?

    We can have all the boyish discussions we want about how tough Americans once were because they could pitch 300 innings a year in the Majors. I’ve been on a Civil War history kick this year and let me tell you- that is TOUGH! Every other page a new general or officer pops up who’s lost at least one major appendage. Let me spell that out for you- they enlisted, fought, had an arm or leg mangled, got it amputated with no or the barest working mid-19th Century anesthesia, recovered, and were back fighting in a matter of months. No honorable discharge w/pension, no long-term recuperation, no years long physical therapy, no PTSD therapy. One general actually had a leg cut off inches above the hip, recovered, then served out the rest of the war, strapped to his saddle and riding mile upon mile over rough country rode with his wound still fresh. Every prior elite had its faults and hypocrisies, but- for the most part- they did serve and lead from the front.

    So when you live under a cowardocracy you are ruled by cowards, and when you’re a coward you panic, and when you panic you are quite apt to explode in vigorous activity that is entirely self-harming. Ruth Zombie Ginsberg told THE NEW YORK TIMES she was considering moving to New Zealand – BEFORE Trump was elected. If you’re terrified of your fellow countrymen turning on you with pitchforks at any moment you don’t rationally discuss the problem of importing more Scimitar-Americans. You panic. You lash out at anyone wanting to discuss the problem, no matter how moderately. You lash out at anyone even wanting to NAME the problem. Again, cowardocracy in action.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    About 1/3 of American Presidents never served in the military, including some greats and not so greats from both parties:

    John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Quincy Adams, Martin Van Buren, Millard Fillmore, Grover Cleveland, William Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Donald Trump.

    The other 2/3 with military backgrounds included some real turkeys (Jimmy Carter). The 2 great world wars of the 20th century followed by the Cold War put a lot of men in uniform who would not have in other times.

    And just because they wore a uniform did not mean that they really fought. LBJ was already a Congressman when he went in during WWII. He was awarded a totally unmerited Silver Star by General MacArthur as a political gesture. Here is his citation:


    For gallantry in action in the vicinity of Port Moresby and Salamaua, New Guinea, on June 9, 1942. While on a mission of obtaining information in the Southwest Pacific area, Lieutenant Commander Johnson, in order to obtain personal knowledge of combat conditions, volunteered as an observer on a hazardous aerial combat mission over hostile positions in New Guinea. As our planes neared the target area they were intercepted by eight hostile fighters. When, at this time, the plane in which Lieutenant Commander Johnson was an observer, developed mechanical trouble and was forced to turn back alone, presenting a favorable target to the enemy fighters, he evidenced marked coolness in spite of the hazards involved. His gallant actions enabled him to obtain and return with valuable information.
     
    Reading between the lines, he got a Silver Star for taking an airplane ride and not crying for his mama.

    The end of the Cold War and the draft saw a massive shrink in our military so it's less likely that future Presidents will have served.

    So you really can't read too much into that one factor.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. @Alec Leamas (hard at work)


    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed.

     

    Really? Where is this written?

    Your argument starts out with a totally false premise so everything that follows is equally false. The Messiah can come at any moment – maybe even today.

     

    Would you say that a Jew who is awaiting the True Messiah would have at least some motivation to debunk/expose a preceding False Messiah? Then let's say that Jew and his fellows had a few thousand years to think about it, and really stew about it because there was this really popular False Messiah who appealed even to lots of non-Jews. And then you wind up in the lands of these non-Jewish False Messiah followers, and not only are they sure their False Messiah isn't indeed false, they think you're the one in error for not recognizing him as the True Messiah! You might be fit to be tied!

    No, not at all. Non-Jews have always had false beliefs from the Jewish POV – they worshipped statues, calves, whatever. Non-Jews are not expected to abide by or believe in Jewish law which were given by God to the Jews via Moses, only by the Noahide laws which were given to the sons of Noah by God and thus applicable to all mankind. So that if you believe in a false Messiah or worship Mohammed or a goat or whatever is not an issue – you do your thing. This has nothing to do with the actual Messiah of the Jews one way or the other. Keep in mind that as a powerless minority from 70 AD onward, Jews were in no position to impose their belief system on anyone. Christians have an urge to convert the unbelievers but there is no Jewish equivalent. Jews were never interested in convincing Christians of the wrongness of their belief system. There was never a Jewish Inquisition in the Diaspora and even Israel has remained fully tolerant of other religions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Really, what are you paid for this tripe?

    https://www.haaretz.com/christians-in-jerusalem-want-jews-to-stop-spitting-on-them-1.137099
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. Maybe the encouragement of mass Muslim immigration into Europe and the US is a cunning Israeli plot to get all of Western Jewry to move to Israel? (I don’t really believe that, but it may work out that way—look at what is happening in France.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  92. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Jewish nervousness and energy remind me of the old saying about military men. The smart and energetic men go on staff, the smart and lazy run the command, the always-wrong and lazy go at the bottom in some BS job, but the always-wrong and energetic must be gotten rid off at all costs because they will destroy your command with their busy-body bull crap.

    Liberal Jews=classic example of always-wrong and energetic. They make bad decision after bad decision that is not even vaguely grounded in real-world thinking because they are pure ideologues who refuse to admit they cannot make the world into something matches their perfect castle-in-the-air utopia. They are also relentless in trying to coerce others into going along with their lousy decisions.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  93. @Anon
    Moore isn't going to date anybody, he's got a wife.

    I kid, I kid.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. I once asked one of my friends who is a Republican and Jewish about why so many of his co-religionists vote/support the left when it really doesn’t serve their interests and he could only come up with “it’s because they feel guilty about being so successful” which neither of us felt really explained things.

    To some extent, there is a cohort that mentally puts themselves in the same ‘victim’ class as other members of the Democratic coalition, as ridiculous as that sounds. After the election last year I was blown away by how many of my friends on social media cited their status as Jews as why they were afraid of Trump and how they can just tell he’s a Nazi. These were all people who are firmly in the top 10% of the country in terms of household income and whose families have been successful for multiple generations, yet they were talking as though they expected the roundups to begin in the near future.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    The most coveted, holy status in America today is "victim" , so can you blame rich people for wanting to get in on the victim game? Jews didn't invent this game. It wasn't a Jewish guy who said, "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven." Oh wait, he was a Jewish guy, but you know what I mean.
    , @Jake
    Jews do what they do because they are defined by being anti-Christ and thus anti-Christendom and thus anti-peoples of historic Christendom, who are white.

    That such action long term is suicidal means nothing to them. Deep down, the vast majority of Jews would much rather risk being totally engulfed by Mohammedans than seem to suggest that Christendom was anything less evil than mindlessly violent anti-Semitism transferred to all whites by a combination of genetics and the Mass/Divine Liturgy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Jack D

    It’s not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.
     
    First of all, I don't think that "contempt for Christian morality" is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as "contempt".

    2nd, I think it IS a leap. In the mind of most Jewish liberals one has nothing to do with the other. They don't think of the US as a zero sum game so that giving opportunity to minorities and immigrants TAKES opportunity way from whites. This is the whole (false) premise behind "affirmative action" - you are just giving some oppressed people who remind me of my oppressed ancestors a helping hand, you are not trying to hurt anyone and in fact you are not hurting anyone because of all of the wonderful benefits that immigrants and diversity will bring to us. This POV may be dead wrong, but it is not meant maliciously. They really do think this way.

    3rd, there is no "long-term [Jewish] project to diminish the cultural dominance of the "host". Going back to George Washington's letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO "host". America is not the goyim's world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.

    If you want to make unfounded leaps in your own bigoted mind, then go ahead, but don't impose imaginary viewpoints on the Jews. If what you are saying is real, show me the minutes of the Elders of Zion where this "project" is discussed or it didn't happen.

    First of all, I don’t think that “contempt for Christian morality” is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as “contempt”.

    As a preliminary matter, I note that you don’t have any qualms about imposing Jewish morality on everyone else. You just pretend that Jewish morality is compelled as a matter of law and reason. Additionally, scruples about abortion is in no way exclusively “Christian” morality.

    But if Jews don’t have contempt for Christian morality, they sure accidentally express something easily mistaken for it an awful lot. From Larry David shaking his schmeckel on an image of Christ to Billy Joel cajoling “good Catholic girls” who hide behind “stained glass curtains” for “starting much too late” these mistakes get made far too often. And Al Goldstein – what a Screw up! I’ll have to just go to Portnoy’s and lodge a complaint against him for his “mistakes.”

    2nd, I think it IS a leap. In the mind of most Jewish liberals one has nothing to do with the other. They don’t think of the US as a zero sum game so that giving opportunity to minorities and immigrants TAKES opportunity way from whites. This is the whole (false) premise behind “affirmative action” – you are just giving some oppressed people who remind me of my oppressed ancestors a helping hand, you are not trying to hurt anyone and in fact you are not hurting anyone because of all of the wonderful benefits that immigrants and diversity will bring to us. This POV may be dead wrong, but it is not meant maliciously. They really do think this way.

    Well, they sure do see any proposal that would take opportunities away from Jews as Zero Sum. Artificially limiting whites in numerically-limited elite institutions by increasing the proportions of lower-qualified minorities – ABSOLUTELY KOSHER! Mere mentioning of the vast over-representations of Jews in elite institutions? Who are you, Hitler?

    I doubt that they “really do think this way.” It seems more likely that they’re both hostile and arrogant and think that no one else notices these patent contradictions with their goyische kopfs. Noticing – it’s the worst of crimes!

    3rd, there is no “long-term [Jewish] project to diminish the cultural dominance of the “host”. Going back to George Washington’s letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO “host”. America is not the goyim’s world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.

    Thanks. I was looking for a new definition of Chutzpah and I think you’ve provided me with about as fine of one as I could have hoped to find.

    If you want to make unfounded leaps in your own bigoted mind, then go ahead, but don’t impose imaginary viewpoints on the Jews. If what you are saying is real, show me the minutes of the Elders of Zion where this “project” is discussed or it didn’t happen.

    How about instead I observe Jewish behavior and extrapolate backwards to the sort of thinking that would precede and instigate that behavior?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @NOTA
    Critical thinking is all about giving yourself tools to check your work, even when it’s giving you the conclusions you are sure must be true by all your instincts and upbringing and tribal assertions of faith.

    “Critical thinking is all about giving yourself tools to check your work, even when it’s giving you the conclusions you are sure must be true by all your instincts and upbringing and tribal assertions of faith.”

    Critical thinking is easier to identify than to define. For example, it is what Pat Buchanan is doing in his book A Republic, Not an Empire. https://goo.gl/1KmTrV

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. @Tiny Duck
    Jews are empathetic to People of Color and other marginilzed groups because they to have been on the receiving end of the white male's evil

    what do white men contribute aside from theft, war, misery, cowardice, and greed? why did white males vote 75% for pedophile Roy Moore?

    I know you guys will accuse me of trolling but consider-ALL Men of Color pretty much agree with me

    Just read Leonard Pitts and see what the truth is

    “ALL Men of Color pretty much agree with me”

    That is an overstatement, but it is basically true. And that truth is the reason that every honest Liberal/Leftist would be demanding that all Jews and ‘peoples of color’ and Mohammedans be saved by forcing whites to stay away from them. They are too precious to be forced to live in the same country as whites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. @Arclight
    I once asked one of my friends who is a Republican and Jewish about why so many of his co-religionists vote/support the left when it really doesn't serve their interests and he could only come up with "it's because they feel guilty about being so successful" which neither of us felt really explained things.

    To some extent, there is a cohort that mentally puts themselves in the same 'victim' class as other members of the Democratic coalition, as ridiculous as that sounds. After the election last year I was blown away by how many of my friends on social media cited their status as Jews as why they were afraid of Trump and how they can just tell he's a Nazi. These were all people who are firmly in the top 10% of the country in terms of household income and whose families have been successful for multiple generations, yet they were talking as though they expected the roundups to begin in the near future.

    The most coveted, holy status in America today is “victim” , so can you blame rich people for wanting to get in on the victim game? Jews didn’t invent this game. It wasn’t a Jewish guy who said, “it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.” Oh wait, he was a Jewish guy, but you know what I mean.

    Read More
    • LOL: Johann Ricke
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. @Arclight
    I once asked one of my friends who is a Republican and Jewish about why so many of his co-religionists vote/support the left when it really doesn't serve their interests and he could only come up with "it's because they feel guilty about being so successful" which neither of us felt really explained things.

    To some extent, there is a cohort that mentally puts themselves in the same 'victim' class as other members of the Democratic coalition, as ridiculous as that sounds. After the election last year I was blown away by how many of my friends on social media cited their status as Jews as why they were afraid of Trump and how they can just tell he's a Nazi. These were all people who are firmly in the top 10% of the country in terms of household income and whose families have been successful for multiple generations, yet they were talking as though they expected the roundups to begin in the near future.

    Jews do what they do because they are defined by being anti-Christ and thus anti-Christendom and thus anti-peoples of historic Christendom, who are white.

    That such action long term is suicidal means nothing to them. Deep down, the vast majority of Jews would much rather risk being totally engulfed by Mohammedans than seem to suggest that Christendom was anything less evil than mindlessly violent anti-Semitism transferred to all whites by a combination of genetics and the Mass/Divine Liturgy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    What would’ve happened if the Jews who left Russia had moved to Israel instead of the west. What would the world be like today? I think we would not be seeing this mess in the world today.

    God’s chosen people alright, chosen to lead us to the promised land, for them, which just happens to be Hell for everyone else.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  101. @guest
    I wonder if there actually is such a thing as "critical thinking skills." Just people who are better at B.S.-ing. There's no actual intellectual discipline called Critical Thinking. It's really more a matter of cultivated taste, as allegedly exists amongst wine connoisseurs.

    If you're smart enough to take the Critical hatchet to everything, you're smart enough to trick yourself into thinking stupid things. And it's difficult if not impossible to be objective about it. Like when I've tried playing chess against myself, my instinct is always to subtly favor one side or the other.

    The scientific method is supposed to work because people who aren't you check your work. People like David Rothschild probably don't listen to people outside ones who agree with him, so he never gets to hear valid criticism.

    Here’s some “valid criticism”.

    Might as well quote Wiki verbatim,

    “Gun violence in the United States is a major national concern that results in………33,636 deaths due to “injury by firearms” (10.6 deaths per 100,000 U.S. citizens).[4] These deaths consisted of 11,208 homicides,[5] 21,175 suicides,[4] 505 deaths due to accidental or negligent discharge of a firearm, and 281 deaths due to firearms use with “undetermined intent”.[4] Of the 2,596,993 total deaths in the US in 2013, 1.3% were related to firearms.[1][6] The ownership and control of guns are among the most widely debated issues in the country.”

    So, 2/3rds of the deaths he’s “happy to talk about” are suicides. And homicides roughly 1/3rd. And we all know the rest about who really is pulling the trigger so there’s no point in reciting more. Anyway, he’s deceitful right out of the blocks.

    Would he really happily deprive suffering people of their best option, the least painful way to end it all? How cruel is that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    It makes sense, though, if you think about it. What's the use in constructing an elaborate torture chamber for your worst tribal enemies if you leave them a way of escaping it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. @peterike

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven’t expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration?

     

    Yes, but you also have the issue of who goes to medical school. A fair number of spots go to foreign students (number should be zero, by law). A lot of them stay here, where the medicaid fraud is easy, and the hiring preferences fat and juicy. But I wonder what percentage take their U.S. medical education and go elsewhere with it? Whatever that number is, it represents us shooting ourselves in the foot through stupidity.

    But the larger problem is that few coming out of medical school want to work in Podunk. Why? Because medical schools are the final step in the elite school process. And what kind of whites get into elite schools? Super SJW/SWPL whites. Therefore, the pool of white students applying to med school is already pre-selected to be majority SJW/SWPL whites, and they all want to live in Williamsburg. You don't have many Johnny and Jane Americans from Podunk even getting into the feeding system because of blatant, anti-white bigotry in elite schools. They don't want conservative, religious farm kids, so there aren't that many that get into med school in the first place that might want to go back and serve rural patients.

    PS - I was at a medical school not long ago. Asians all over the place, and even a few hijab wearing Muslim women. Ain't America grand.

    Keep in mind that a lot of American doctors educated at foreign medical schools (because US med school too hard to get into) so “doctors can only attend med school in their home country” cuts both ways.

    I don’t doubt that there are farm boys in Iowa who have no desire to attend Harvard med school (which doesn’t want them either) but almost every state has its own med school as part of its state university system (and law school, etc.) . If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren’t that many who do. Either he would rather stay on the family farm or is not smart enough/hard working enough to get thru med school in the 1st place or if he is, after med school he wants to move somewhere that has better restaurants than Podunk and where he can make more $. So the choice of the good people of Podunk, KS is either Arjun as their family doctor or nobody.

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Medicine and law are both ruined and need drastic reform. Law needs to start learning what the Constitution is and medicine needs an end to arbitrary pricing, out-of-control insurance cartels, high cost education (which will come down with the other two), and universally paralyzing lawsuit danger. The worse, the better: I do not speak for only myself when I say I do not want a more efficient version of the current situation. I have been in conversations where experienced doctors in confidence tell young people to not go into medicine because of the insurance companies and the lawsuits.
    And then we can fix teaching. I'm not going to command children of any ethnicity to vote Democrat in exchange for being accused of pedophilia once a year.
    Tldr all our institutions have the same problem and need to be violently dragged back to the principles and traditions that made them successful.
    , @Peterike
    “I don’t doubt that there are farm boys in Iowa who have no desire to attend Harvard med school (which doesn’t want them either) but almost every state has its own med school as part of its state university system (and law school, etc.) . If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren’t that many who do.”

    What rot. Every med school in America is hyper competitive to get into. There’s no free ride for that “bright farm boy” you have the typical Jewish contempt for.
    , @Discard
    Colleges prefer foreigners because they pay the full cost, no in state tuition breaks and so forth. So every Ahmad or Patel represents a Smith or McMahon denied admission.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. OT: Trump to blame for imprisonmen of journalists in Turkey, China

    http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-love-dictators-hatred-media-leads-rise-journalists-jailed-746621

    If I wasn’t laughing I’d be crying…!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  104. @Nico
    The problem is Christian Zionism.

    If something could call into question the Covenant Theology nonsense of the idiots in "Bible-believin'" churches it would surely be that the clan those doctrines refer to that would rip out the second half of their Bible, refer to the Second Person of their God as "the great blasphemer" and vote the replacement of themselves and their children and the end of any place recognizable as the one they grew up in, all in a heartbeat.

    Alas, they STILL center their theology AND their votes on the material interests of said clan.

    Hopeless?

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. Judaizing heresy always produces pro-Jewish politics and culture. WASP culture is the product of Puritanism. Oliver Cromwell allied with Jews to take their money granting Jews the right to re-enter England legally and even granting them rights and privileges denied to the vast majority of Christian natives of the British Isles.

    WASP culture as a whole, and not just the American Falwell or Swaggart type Evangelicals, is pro-Jewish and like Oliver Cromwell will sacrifice the vast majority of white Gentiles in order to promote Jews.

    Read More
    • Agree: Nico
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @Nico
    The problem is Christian Zionism.

    If something could call into question the Covenant Theology nonsense of the idiots in "Bible-believin'" churches it would surely be that the clan those doctrines refer to that would rip out the second half of their Bible, refer to the Second Person of their God as "the great blasphemer" and vote the replacement of themselves and their children and the end of any place recognizable as the one they grew up in, all in a heartbeat.

    Alas, they STILL center their theology AND their votes on the material interests of said clan.

    Hopeless?

    Agree that xn Zionism is a problem. But you have your theological terms mixed up.

    Christian Zionism is part of a (fairly recent) theological system known as Dispensationalism. (Think Pentecostals, and baptists).

    Covenant theology (Think Presbyterians and Reformed) on the other hand is opposed to Christian Zionism and most books debunking xn Zionism are written by covenant theologians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Nico
    Thanks. I'd been led astray by my memories of a Presbyterian I'd known who was strictly anti-dispensationalist yet politically fervently pro-Israel. I must've assimilated "Covenant Theology" to something else.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. @Svigor
    AD, Jewish culture is so full of denial, obfuscation, misdirection, evasion, and other defense mechanisms designed to perpetually absolve Jews of guilt that by the time Jews have filtered anything through it, even they barely know what they're thinking.

    But Jews should be worried about quotas. America seems far more likely to impose quotas on Jews, and everyone else, than to repeal Affirmative Action; following through and making the whole thing a strict quota system is an easy argument to make, uses poztard logic against phony poztards like Jews.

    >>But Jews should be worried about quotas. America seems far more likely to impose quotas on Jews,

    But “society” is not yet imposing quotas on Jews in admission to elite universities. Well in fact maybe there are quotas, in the sense that their is a floor of Jewish admittance that administrators dare not let the Jewish component fall through. Just look at the numbers. One doesn’t need a degree in statistics to figure this out. Common sense, arithmetic and inference will carry the argument.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. @J.Ross
    The Politburo controlled every last detail in a country where bribery, larceny, shipment-lightening and an enormous black market were both normative and necessitated by the failure of the official economy?
    The Politburo controlled the hiring of individual secretaries?

    Yes and the Akkadian, Hittite, and Assyrian Empires did much the same also Babylonia. Ultrea centralized planed pre monetary societies. Long history of such peoples.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. @Abe
    In the bigger picture (and it pains me to say it) I think most Western democracies are done. Kaput. Effectively over and only waiting to be garbage collected and replaced. This sounds awfully radical- it may SEEM America has been around forever and will prove more eternal than Rome (Fukuyama's end of history and all that), but from a comparative perspective it is on par with the lifecycle of classical Greek democracies and seems to be following the same end-game- a 'golden age' period of effervescence followed by a slide into degeneracy as smart sociopaths (just like the sophists in Socrates's day) game the system for all its short-term worth. All the flaws of the democratic model that Aristotle and Machiavelli identified so long ago are coming to the fore now. I see no real difference between the current 'invite the world' vote-farming gimmick which pretty much all left-of-center parties in the most ADVANCED Western democracies now exploit to the hilt, and classical Greek polis tactic of appealing to invaders (Athens if your faction is 'democratic', Sparta if it is oligarchic) to settle internal political squabbles (and provide the necessary muscle to expropriate, exile and maybe massacre your internal enemies). I do not see this ending well unless open borders insanity comes to a halt real soon.

    More on-topic, the problem we have is that we are now a cowardocracy. Think of the wealthiest, most famous, most influential dudes in America now- Buffett, Gates, Brin, Zuckerberg, Bezos. Isn't it amazing that not one of them ever served in the military (I may be wrong on Buffett given his age and the existence of the draft in the 50's, but I see no record of it on Wikipedia)? Isn't it amazing that it's almost impossible to imagine any of them even getting into a fistfight, let alone winning one? I'm not pushing forward some Hemingway-esque caricature of boxing/safari/deepwater fishing masculinity (and given that Hemingway was so fixated on this, he really was a beta at heart). I'm just saying it's quite remarkable and historically anomalous almost none of our national elites have a martial background given that the PRIMARY duty of a national elite is to stave off foreign encroachment? And that not having said martial background, they have none of the martial virtues like bravery, honor, resilience?

    We can have all the boyish discussions we want about how tough Americans once were because they could pitch 300 innings a year in the Majors. I've been on a Civil War history kick this year and let me tell you- that is TOUGH! Every other page a new general or officer pops up who's lost at least one major appendage. Let me spell that out for you- they enlisted, fought, had an arm or leg mangled, got it amputated with no or the barest working mid-19th Century anesthesia, recovered, and were back fighting in a matter of months. No honorable discharge w/pension, no long-term recuperation, no years long physical therapy, no PTSD therapy. One general actually had a leg cut off inches above the hip, recovered, then served out the rest of the war, strapped to his saddle and riding mile upon mile over rough country rode with his wound still fresh. Every prior elite had its faults and hypocrisies, but- for the most part- they did serve and lead from the front.

    So when you live under a cowardocracy you are ruled by cowards, and when you're a coward you panic, and when you panic you are quite apt to explode in vigorous activity that is entirely self-harming. Ruth Zombie Ginsberg told THE NEW YORK TIMES she was considering moving to New Zealand - BEFORE Trump was elected. If you're terrified of your fellow countrymen turning on you with pitchforks at any moment you don't rationally discuss the problem of importing more Scimitar-Americans. You panic. You lash out at anyone wanting to discuss the problem, no matter how moderately. You lash out at anyone even wanting to NAME the problem. Again, cowardocracy in action.

    About 1/3 of American Presidents never served in the military, including some greats and not so greats from both parties:

    John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Quincy Adams, Martin Van Buren, Millard Fillmore, Grover Cleveland, William Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Donald Trump.

    The other 2/3 with military backgrounds included some real turkeys (Jimmy Carter). The 2 great world wars of the 20th century followed by the Cold War put a lot of men in uniform who would not have in other times.

    And just because they wore a uniform did not mean that they really fought. LBJ was already a Congressman when he went in during WWII. He was awarded a totally unmerited Silver Star by General MacArthur as a political gesture. Here is his citation:

    For gallantry in action in the vicinity of Port Moresby and Salamaua, New Guinea, on June 9, 1942. While on a mission of obtaining information in the Southwest Pacific area, Lieutenant Commander Johnson, in order to obtain personal knowledge of combat conditions, volunteered as an observer on a hazardous aerial combat mission over hostile positions in New Guinea. As our planes neared the target area they were intercepted by eight hostile fighters. When, at this time, the plane in which Lieutenant Commander Johnson was an observer, developed mechanical trouble and was forced to turn back alone, presenting a favorable target to the enemy fighters, he evidenced marked coolness in spite of the hazards involved. His gallant actions enabled him to obtain and return with valuable information.

    Reading between the lines, he got a Silver Star for taking an airplane ride and not crying for his mama.

    The end of the Cold War and the draft saw a massive shrink in our military so it’s less likely that future Presidents will have served.

    So you really can’t read too much into that one factor.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Whoever

    [Lyndon Johnson] got a Silver Star for taking an airplane ride and not crying for his mama.
     
    I think LBJ's volunteering for this mission showed courage---June 9, 1942, 11 B-26s, six B-17s and five B-25s escorted by eight P-39s attack in daylight the heavily-defended Japanese base at Lae. That was not some milk run by any means.
    Johnson was assigned to fly as observer in 1440-86, but there was some confusion getting the VIP passengers squared away and Lt. Col. Francis Stevens, who was escorting Johnson on his tour of the combat area, got aboard -86 and Johnson got into another plane, 1440-88.
    Because of this delay, the B-26s were late getting airborne and lagged behind the rest of the formation, losing the protection of the fighter escort and the defensive firepower of the other bombers' guns.
    On take-off, -88 suffered a generator failure. The plane stayed with the formation for a half-hour before the pilot aborted and returned to base. Johnson's diary for the day records merely, "After we were off the field with [PIC] Greer, generator went out: crew begged him to go on. For the next 30 minutes we flew on one generator."
    The early model B-26 had a marginal 12 volt electrical system. Loss of a generator put a strain on the remaining one, which was needed to control the electric props and the electric gun turret. It was SOP to abort with a generator failure because if the remaining generator failed, the aircraft would be lost.
    On nearing the target, the American force was intercepted by 24 Zeros. The B-26 Johnson had been assigned to, 40-1486, was shot down, all aboard being killed. Another B-26, 40-1363 was shot up so badly it crashed while attempting to land on the return. Four other B-26s suffered battle damage.
    While it suffered no damage on this mission, -88 was shot down on a later mission and both the pilot and co-pilot were killed.
    Normally, an observer on a combat mission would have been awarded an Air Medal. Brigadier General William Marquat, who flew on the mission in 40-1496, recommended Johnson for the Silver Star and Major General Richard Sutherland, MacArthur's chief of staff, approved it.
    The pretext for giving LBJ the Silver Star is in a letter to him from Marquat: "Your outstanding bravery in volunteering for a so-called 'suicide mission' in order to get a first-hand view of what our Army fliers go through has been subject of much favorable comment since your departure. It is indeed a great government we have when members of Congress take THOSE [sic] chances in order to better serve their fellow men in the legislative bodies. You surely earned your decoration."
    Doubtless, the award was made for reasons other than honoring Johnson's bravery, however. Consider the timing: the Battle of Midway had just ended when the mission was flown and the Battle of the Coral Sea was only a month old. The Navy was getting all the credit for fighting the Japanese, Lieutenant Commander Butch O'Hare was a household name, and the army in the southwest Pacific was being ignored. The Japanese had not yet been defeated in New Guinea and were still driving toward Port Moresby. They held control of the air and were bombing Australia.
    Journalists as well as visiting politicians were also given VIP treatment in hopes of generating publicity, and frequently flew on dangerous missions and wrote some very compelling accounts of what they witnessed.
    Hobart Skidmore, a then-famous reporter who had covered the labor unrest in the West Virginia coal mines, wrote a series of gripping articles about the New Guinea air war in those early days, describing, for example, Japanese fighters bursting through clouds to intercept American bombers, "climbing as if they had been fired from gigantic guns."
    A Life photographer wrote about his harrowing experiences when the B-26 he was flying in was torn apart by a monstrous thunderstorm. He made the mistake of opening his parachute while still in the storm and stayed aloft for over two hours and was taken so high he lost consciousness and suffered frost bite. Once he got on the ground it took him a month struggling through the jungle to get back to friendly territory. He was feted by MacArthur and given a VIP flight home.
    As far as Johnson is concerned, he didn't need to volunteer to fly a combat mission, only luck prevented him from being killed on that mission, and he did not solicit a medal.
    MacArthur's staff was merely trying to direct attention to their efforts and so, hopefully, get more supplies and reinforcements -- when Johnson flew his mission, the 22nd Bomb Group he flew with was so short of personnel that aircrew serviced and armed their own planes.
    At the time of Johnson's flight, the entire fighter strength of the Army Air Force in New Guinea was two P-39 squadrons, only based at Moresby for about 2 months, during which time they had lost 36 planes, 25 in air combat, eight due to mechanical problems and three destroyed on the ground by bombing.
    It took some courage for Johnson to even fly out to New Guinea during that era, and you have to credit him. He could have stayed in Brisbane schmoozing. Instead he went right to the heart of the battle front and fully intended to fly a combat mission over a Japanese stronghold.
    Harold Ickes, in his diary, writes of this episode that MacArthur offered Johnson the medal but that Johnson declined. Only some time later did Johnson receive the citation and medal in the mail.
    The award clearly was important to Johnson, and throughout his career he never missed an opportunity to wear the Silver Star pin in his lapel. You can see it in the famous swearing-in ceremony on Air Force One after the Kennedy assassination. And he wore it in his lapel for his official presidential photograph
    https://i.imgur.com/SX2kJYl.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. ‘embarrassing levels of Trump Trauma and Putin Psychosis stem from Jewish paranoia.’

    I personally thought the Trump Russia thing was people thought he might end invade the world / invite the world, or just tone it down a bit. The forever war is safe, and immigration levels probably are just fluctuating with the economy. If Trump had been left to his own devices he might have actually messed things up as NATO is obsolete and Iraqistan is a disaster but fear not, he has not changed anything much.

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Jews are often highly irrational at first but good enough at coming up with an excuse that you forget this, so a major key in learning to predict their moves is to not ask what an intelligent person would do, and instead to picture a cartoon Semite (2kyo Man, not Streicher) from Tribe A who spits on the ground at the most abstract suggestion of Tribe B.
    Jews hate Russia. Here endeth the lesson. There's some history to that, and you can learn it if you want, but it won't change anything or make things more clear than they are. And if you ask, would they actually maintain that hate beyond Russia being any kind of threat, and even past the very existence of Russia, well, that's what Amalek is.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. @Anonymous
    In other news, Swedish police recently thwarted a planned grenade attack on the main Swedish synagogue.
    No surprises to read that a gang of Muslim immigrants to Sweden planned the attack.
    The irony is, of course, that Sweden was a 'safe haven' for Jews throughout the tumult of the 20th century ..... and until quite recently. Sweden was never outright antisemitic. The new imported population is, however, and with a vengeance. Some of the biggest supporters and defenders of the massive Muslim immigration into Sweden are Jews.

    Unlike France, Muslims are not a 'colonial legacy'. This makes the madness even more acute.

    It is Jewish desire for suicide that almost no Jews recognize, because they see it as Jews forcing the whites to pay for Christendom.

    Scandinavian Germans were savages going a-viking as their jobs. Over time, they were civilized by the Catholic Church and its emissaries, which provided them with a high culture that was Latinate.The Reformation allowed them to recover the Germanic pagan love of war for the sake of war, and for a couple of centuries, the Swedes and the equally Protestant re-paganized Germanic Prussians were per capita the most terrifyingly effective soldiers in the world.

    But rebelling against Christendom always leads a culture to decay, with its military might and economics the last to go. But everything worthwhile about the culture decays, because the culture has chosen slow suicide when choosing rebellion against Christendom.

    Swedish culture is in latter stages of suicide. That cannot change unless Swedes return to the ideas and allegiances of Christendom.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB

    Scandinavian Germans were savages going a-viking as their jobs. Over time, they were civilized by the Catholic Church and its emissaries, which provided them with a high culture that was Latinate.The Reformation allowed them to recover the Germanic pagan love of war for the sake of war, and for a couple of centuries, the Swedes and the equally Protestant re-paganized Germanic Prussians were per capita the most terrifyingly effective soldiers in the world.
     
    That's really interesting, and strikes me as containing a good deal of truth.
    , @Anon
    I get your point, but must nuance. What is Christendom? I'd use Carroll's definition. Christendom is the reign of Christ on earth, that is to say, the recognition by men of the reign (creation by, omnipresence of) of God. Much of it is invisible, that is, supernatural. Much of it too, is inevitably personal.

    But some of it is public and historical, as when men formed with Christian consciences get together in a political community, and their laws and institutions deliberately seek to conform to natural law, and to the Christian understanding of God's laws (for example, the inherent dignity of the human person.) When Christians live as such, the social, artistic and political presence of Christendom grows. Nowadays, I don't think we can say Christendom has a recognizably public face (maybe in Hungary, with its explicit Constitution? Maybe Russia to a point, maybe parts of Latin America. ), though there are pockets of sanity and Christian life. 

    The swedes or any other group that doesn't conform to natural law in sufficient degree cannot, of course, prosper or attain/retain high culture. But is it rebellion? I rather think the spiritus mundi has made great strides in the last 100 years, aided by faulty catechesis (Catholicism after all exists to tell us how we ought to live), the horrors of massive wars and the indolences born of plenty. If Europeans don't have Christian consciences, how can they express Christendom? A civilization that has known Christianity is choosing to go back down into the swamp. Shielded by economic plenty and poor in historic memory, it doesn't really know how dark paganism can be. 

    What, do you think, can we do?

    As to Swedish suicide, I couldn't agree more. Harsh but illustrative:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e8iLVNx_nRU
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. @Jack D
    Keep in mind that a lot of American doctors educated at foreign medical schools (because US med school too hard to get into) so "doctors can only attend med school in their home country" cuts both ways.

    I don't doubt that there are farm boys in Iowa who have no desire to attend Harvard med school (which doesn't want them either) but almost every state has its own med school as part of its state university system (and law school, etc.) . If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren't that many who do. Either he would rather stay on the family farm or is not smart enough/hard working enough to get thru med school in the 1st place or if he is, after med school he wants to move somewhere that has better restaurants than Podunk and where he can make more $. So the choice of the good people of Podunk, KS is either Arjun as their family doctor or nobody.

    Medicine and law are both ruined and need drastic reform. Law needs to start learning what the Constitution is and medicine needs an end to arbitrary pricing, out-of-control insurance cartels, high cost education (which will come down with the other two), and universally paralyzing lawsuit danger. The worse, the better: I do not speak for only myself when I say I do not want a more efficient version of the current situation. I have been in conversations where experienced doctors in confidence tell young people to not go into medicine because of the insurance companies and the lawsuits.
    And then we can fix teaching. I’m not going to command children of any ethnicity to vote Democrat in exchange for being accused of pedophilia once a year.
    Tldr all our institutions have the same problem and need to be violently dragged back to the principles and traditions that made them successful.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. @Anonymous
    In other news, Swedish police recently thwarted a planned grenade attack on the main Swedish synagogue.
    No surprises to read that a gang of Muslim immigrants to Sweden planned the attack.
    The irony is, of course, that Sweden was a 'safe haven' for Jews throughout the tumult of the 20th century ..... and until quite recently. Sweden was never outright antisemitic. The new imported population is, however, and with a vengeance. Some of the biggest supporters and defenders of the massive Muslim immigration into Sweden are Jews.

    Unlike France, Muslims are not a 'colonial legacy'. This makes the madness even more acute.

    It’s a shame the Swedish police don’t spend more time protecting White Swedish women, rather than immigrants.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. (Cantor’s older son had previously been a member of the frat when Haven Monahan would have rushed, if Haven hadn’t been nonexistent.)

    You’re killin’ me, Sal! Almost LLOLed … that’s Literally LOLed, like in meat-space.

    Still reading, Steve, but great stuff. Your tone is very polite too, so I don’t see how anyone can call you names on this one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  114. @George
    'embarrassing levels of Trump Trauma and Putin Psychosis stem from Jewish paranoia.'

    I personally thought the Trump Russia thing was people thought he might end invade the world / invite the world, or just tone it down a bit. The forever war is safe, and immigration levels probably are just fluctuating with the economy. If Trump had been left to his own devices he might have actually messed things up as NATO is obsolete and Iraqistan is a disaster but fear not, he has not changed anything much.

    Jews are often highly irrational at first but good enough at coming up with an excuse that you forget this, so a major key in learning to predict their moves is to not ask what an intelligent person would do, and instead to picture a cartoon Semite (2kyo Man, not Streicher) from Tribe A who spits on the ground at the most abstract suggestion of Tribe B.
    Jews hate Russia. Here endeth the lesson. There’s some history to that, and you can learn it if you want, but it won’t change anything or make things more clear than they are. And if you ask, would they actually maintain that hate beyond Russia being any kind of threat, and even past the very existence of Russia, well, that’s what Amalek is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    That sounds like a Jewish version of the so-called "rationalization hamster" that manosphere types say women use to find rational justifications for their irrational desires.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. @Dmitry
    As a rule, in the United States (and other countries), being liberal is positively correlated with education and IQ, which does not say much for the role of education in improving politics. Non-Russian speaking Jews in the United States are the demographic which has been most programmed by over-education. (Although Jews outside the US, usually favor centrist politics for particular reasons - Muslim immigration in Europe; conflict with Muslims in Israel).

    Taxi drivers usually have more sensible politics than college professors. Countries with the most educated and high IQ populations (look at Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands), generally have the most liberal politics.

    There are exceptions like Israel or Japan - where this is a result of war (in the former case), or very high levels of nationalistic programming (in the former and latter case).

    Switzerland is another special case of a conservative, yet educated, population (although 1/4 of people in Switzerland are foreigners).

    Taxi drivers usually have more sensible politics than college professors. Countries with the most educated and high IQ populations (look at Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands), generally have the most liberal politics.

    Higher education is like salt. Every country needs some, but not too much. A college education is probably required by five percent (at most) of the population. Anything over that figure and higher education becomes a liability rather than an asset for the nation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. @Svigor

    The only thing keeping Jews from becoming a fat, waddling(Jews tend to walk funny) target of opportunity are whites whom they hate beyond all measure. Really how long would Jews survive in a place like Niger or Mali? Not very as ethnics don’t really care about Jewish things. Even where whites still dominate the security services as in Europe there are nations where Jews are leavig because of the increasing violence directed towards them by Muslim imports.
     
    I think it helps to see Jews not as hating Whites, but as having a master-slave view. White slaveowners liked happy, dancing, singing blacks who obeyed the rules and stayed on the plantation just fine; Jews like "goodwhites" just fine. It's the uppity badwhites who read and do their own thinking (leads to uprisings) who are the problem. This is precisely because Jews see Whites as their natural hosts, and can't survive without them in places like Niger or Mali. As for the Jews being forced to leave Europe, I suppose they're mostly the conspicuous Jews who can't give up the yarmulkes, sidelocks, black hats, or other Jewish traditions of no concern to the majority of Jews.

    It's also worth pointing out that the White slaveowning class was just fine with more Black "immigration" from Africa; the demographic dangers didn't really rate.

    Right now the US economy probably does not function without immigrants, and the alt right does not give much of a plan for correcting that. So he is right.
     
    "Right now the addict doesn't function without his dope." Yeah there's a plan, it's called detox.

    I’m thinking of Sun Tzu’s dictum that maximum fighting effort comes with your back against the wall and no escape; I guess that is one reason to promulgate a narrative that we are ever precariously balanced on a precipice of genocide, and a holocaust is just one bad thought away from being ignited; constant vigilance and effort are called for, even if it means throwing every immigrant at hand against the alleged foe.
     
    Yes, I've been saying this for years; psychologically, Jews get themselves into a place where they're fighting the next genocide when it comes to racial issues, addressing Jewish power, etc. When you're "fighting for survival" you don't have to observe niceties like morality, honesty, or responsibility. (The slaveowner view is enabled this way; Jews must have Whites as host, it's a matter of survival; Jews have an inborn right to have Whites as their hosts)

    Both the Talmud & the OT teach that Gentiles will gratefully and willingly become slaves to the Jews. I’ve read rabbis that say we are different species and that Gentiles will love serving them. They will be doing us a favor.

    Given evangelical sycophants devotion to Israel, who can disagree?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I remember trying to explain this to a guy from a certain European county who thought that, because his people had helped the Jews in the past, and still gave occasional assistance to Israel, that Jews were grateful and would reciprocate if ever the need arose. Do not expect reciprocity from Jews. If they repay you that should be considered a fortunate bonus, not something you should expect by right.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. @Tiny Duck
    Jews are empathetic to People of Color and other marginilzed groups because they to have been on the receiving end of the white male's evil

    what do white men contribute aside from theft, war, misery, cowardice, and greed? why did white males vote 75% for pedophile Roy Moore?

    I know you guys will accuse me of trolling but consider-ALL Men of Color pretty much agree with me

    Just read Leonard Pitts and see what the truth is

    White Man’s evil? Was it white men or black men who committed genocide in Uganda, Equatorial Guinea, Burundi, Rwanda, Nigeria, Zimbabwe etc… What is crime rate in Jamacia or South Africa compared to lilly white Switzerland or Finland? Black murder rate in any country compared to whites living in the same country? Ducks in Glass Houses shouldn’t throw stones.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    I never learned how to really play the game, but chess is a useful metaphor for Jewish Power.

    Not only are there different levels of mastery but different chess pieces have different roles serving various layers of power.

    Not all Jews play the Game of Power at high levels. Some are either dumb, mediocre, or too hotheaded to see the bigger picture. Uncontrolled personality can override and destroy even high IQ people. Norman Mailer nearly destroyed his career by stabbing his wife. Had she died, his career would have suffered a great setback. Roman Polanski ended up in exile because he couldn’t control his boing, a rather perverse one at that. Kubrick was smart to remove himself from the temptations. It’s like Dylan retreated to some suburb in Woodstock for awhile when things got too crazy.

    In chess, there is the gambit that looks like a bad move but actually sets up for something bigger down the line. So, what seems like Jewish stupidity or short-sightedness could be a gambit. It’s like in HOUSE OF GAMES and GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS. The winners can see a little more ahead than the other guy. Even without the good leads, they have mental leads. They can use empathy to emotionally gauge the other characters. And it’s not just about a cold dry game but about emotions. How to manipulate emotions. The woman in HOUSE OF GAMES is conned not only by the brilliance of the huckster but his charms and flattery of her own repressed ego.

    Among the chess pieces, the lowest are the pawns. Some Jews are just pawns. The low-level Jews, the antifa bottomfeeder type and SJW dummies. They think stupidly and act dumbly… just like pawns in chess, but they can be effective in short bursts or their madness can serve as blocking tactics. Antifa terror suppresses Free Speech by nationalists, esp as Antifa and SJW get special protection from the Police as seen in Berkeley and Charlottesville. So, pawns are useful to the Power.

    [MORE]

    But there are other pieces.

    Neocons are like the knights/horses. They are unpredictable. They are supposed to be ‘conservative’, but their motions always turn this way or that way. They seem to be moving forward but one can’t tell which way they will hook, left or right. Also, Neocons, as ‘conservatives’ who work(often very well) with Liberal Zionists, jump over the understood boundaries. Neocons jump from left to right to left to right.

    Jewish Media are like bishops. Bishops are mercurial and slip diagonally all across the board. When straight lanes are blocked, bishops can slip in sideways. And media are like that. As its signals go all over the place, it permeates into every household. Con or Lib, any American who turns on the radio or TV or even internet(due to ethno-monopoly control of platforms that work with ADL), come under the power of Jewish bishop power.

    Jewish Power in Deep State and institutions like Academia are like Rooks. Less obvious and mobile than bishop power when the board is cluttered but more solid and substantive. They are the bastions of power that give directives to the media on what can be said and can’t be said.

    Jewish oligarchic power is like the Queen. Super-rich Jews can exert tremendous power by donating to colleges, buying up politicians, funding certain kind of activists(in NGO’s), and spreading cash all around. Just think of what a sole Adelson or Soros can do. A lot.

    And then, there is the King. The King is chess is the most important piece, but it also the most vulnerable piece without much direct power. But if it goes, all else goes. Even if you got rooks, bishops, knights, and queen, a checkmate is checkmate. It’s game over. On that basis, the King is the most important piece even though, in some ways, it is the most ineffective and weakest piece.
    And this goes for Jews. The most important thing for Jews is the Covenant, though it’s been secularized in recent times.

    In some ways, what is most valuable to Jews is the idea of the Covenant(with God, History, Destiny, etc). Without it, Jewishness cannot exist. Without it, there would have been no plan to regain the Holy Land. Jews have gained a lot in history and then lost nearly everything.. but they carried on. Why? The Covenant. So, if a billionaire Jew loses every penny but retains the Covenant, he still has Jewishness that can be passed down through the generations. It is priceless. Because the Covenant isn’t one individual or institution, it has no practical or applicable power. It’s not like the military or money. But it’s the thing that gives Jews a sense of center and serves as a compass in their navigation through space and time. It’s like no matter how big a ship with how many crew and how many guns, the ships in the Voyage of Discovery would have been lost without the compass or other means to gauge direction.

    The Covenant is a strange and paradoxical thing. It keeps Jews humble but also most arrogant and megalomaniacal. As a pact with God, they must bow down before the Lord. Among secular Jews, the Covenant is with History and/or Justice, like Marx with theory of class and revolution. The covenant is humbling because it says Jews must serve something bigger than themselves, be it God or History or Humanity or Justice or Truth or some such. But it is also arrogant because it gives Jews the sense that they have a special place in history. Jews feel that without them, the world would be missing the axle. Wheels will spin out in all directions. Jews need to hold everything together because they and only they understand and see the Big Picture. This paradox was there in Jesus Himself, who was the most humble Man before God but also the most megalomaniacal Man who ever lived, claiming to be Son of God and God Himself.

    Jews are humbled by the Covenant because it allowed them to survive and carry on even when everything seemed lost. Even when all their fortunes were gone and their cities burned down, they had this special identity and sense of place in the universe.
    But because the Covenant proved their resilience and ability to comeback from the direst setbacks and tragedies(and because it connected them with the Laws of the Universe), it made them feel as the most special people.

    This Covenant cannot be owned by a single Jew, yet it belongs to every Jew as an individual soul. In pagan myths, if a man is favored by gods and made great as a demi-god-like figure, it is a favor bestowed onto him alone. But in the story of Abraham, what was given to Abraham is to be passed down the generations as a fire in the soul. It is the one equalizer between the richest Jew and poorest Jew, happiest Jew living in freedom and unhappiest Jew living in bondage. The Covenant reminds the poorest Jew that he could rise to the top because he is of the special Tribe. It also reminds the richest Jew that his life still has meaning and value because, even if he loses everything, he still has the Covenant that links him with God or History.

    Without the Covenant, Jews could not have risen so powerfully(as a People and Power than as mere individuals) after WWII and Shoah.
    Also, it is the ONLY thing that can last indefinitely. The richest and most powerful Jews today will die in a few decades. Soros and Adelson can’t live forever. And there’s no telling what their children will do the fortunes. No one lives forever. Radical individualism is dumb hubris. But Covenant is forever. It was around 2000 yrs ago and it can remain 2000 yrs from now if Jews pass it down generation after generation.

    So, to understand the psychological roots of Jewish Power, we need to focus on the King piece, the Covenant. It is almost invisible like the King in chess as it’s hardly moved and often hidden via ‘castling’. And yet, it is the source of Jewish Power through the ages. Without the Covenant, there can be rich and successful Jewish individuals who exert individual power, much like Bill Gates or Tim Cook does. But individual power is only for a lifetime whereas Covenant Power is for all time. Indeed, notice how even Cook and his ilk serve Jewish Power since it exists as a focus of identity. Cook may serve himself as a successful individual but when it comes to ‘something bigger than myself’, he defers to Jewish power of ADL because it exists as a Covenant, an Idea, an ageless ethno-proposition.
    Suppose there are 100 Irishmen and 100 Poles. Suppose 100 Irishmen have lost interest in their Irishness and just see themselves as either lone individuals or part of generic humanity. In contrast, suppose Poles cling to their sense of Polishness with pride and prestige. Over time, even the Irish individuals will come to serve and honor Polishness because it retains its force as an identity. It’s like if you have two big blocks of magnets and if you keep one magnet whole while breaking the other magnet into tiny little individual pieces, the tiny little pieces will gravitate to the big magnet and stick to it. Why are Anglos in Canada and Irish in Ireland celebrating Black History Month? Why are they into Holocaust Cult Worship? Because having cucked out their own identity as ‘white bread’ and ‘boring’, they either see themselves as lone individuals(the Irish ‘right’) or as generic humanity(the Irish ‘left’). Since genericism lacks direction, it is attracted to Other identities that retain its center and meaning. Since blackness is into ‘yo, I be badass and kick butt and hump every ho’, the cucked out whites are gravitating toward blackness. And some even turn to Islam since it remains a viable and powerful spiritual ideology. Christianity has become so generic that it caves to Homomania among Liberal christos or to Zionism among Conzo christos. “Muh holy homos” or “Muh holy Israel”.

    If Jews were to lose or abandon the Covenant, they could still be rich and successful, like many Wasps are. But they would have no power beyond that of individuals. Bill Gates is a very rich man and has power of money and position. But he is not part of any power as a people, culture, or tribe. He may claim to be of the Geek Tribe, but geeks serve technology and don’t live forever.

    And this is why Jews are pissed with Putin and Trump. Jews know neither Putin or Trump intends to hold Nazi rallies and send Jews to death camps. They don’t even intend to take away Jewish property. Even with Putin’s pro-Russian economic policies, many of the super-rich in Russia are Jewish or non-Russian. Some are even Muslim.
    So, why are Jews so upset? Because gentile nationalism is a nascent kind of gentile covenantism. The thing is a people cannot serve two covenants. For a long time, Jews were into serving their own Covenant and just getting along with goyim, thought to be different or even filthy(by some Jews). And in the Middle East, it seems Jews were successful but knew their place and were tolerated and didn’t get Too Big. In the Ottoman Empire, Jews were among the successful minority middlemen along with Greeks and Armenians. In such places, Jews sought success but not total control. Muslim World remained under the power of Islam. And Jews in the Middle East were more traditional and remained humble before their own traditions.

    But things were different in the West. I don’t know about the virtues of INTERSTELLAR, which I failed to finish watching because I don’t think ‘corn is good’ is a very inspiring idea. But this article gets at something about the West.

    https://altright.com/2017/12/11/is-interstellar-a-movie-about-the-faustian-soul-of-the-white-race/

    The West developed a Faustian soul, and it goes back to Greek mythology and Germanic mythology. It’s what Joseph Campbell talks about. It’s the soul’s equivalent of breaking the Sound Barrier. According to traditional Judaism, there is nothing greater than God, and Jews better watch out.. or else they’ll end up like Edward G. Robinson in THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. If Howard Stern, Harvey Weinstein, and Ron Jeremy had given lip to Moses, they would have been wiped out too with the help of Yahweh.
    And Islam means Submission. Allah is great and man is little and he better know his place.
    There is an element of humility in Christianity certainly. But it is also the story of Jesus the Man becoming God. It also about Saul-as-Paul playing the Promethean-Faustian figure and stealing the holy fire of the Jews and passing it off to gentiles and making that New Fire burn brighter and stronger than that of the Jews. Also, a Faustian Pact was made between the most pacifist of religions and most fiercest of all warrior races. Roman Empire collapse physically but survived and gained supremacy over all of Europe spiritually. Barbarians physically overran Rome, but the Roman Church spiritually spread its fire to the darkest and coldest corners of Europe. And Classical Learning, esp after revival during the Renaissance, set the white race onto a Faustian path. Unlike other peoples who accepted certain truths to be timeless, ultimate, and final, the Western Man kept on pushing the boundaries of what is knowable. Unlike other races who felt, “We know enough and the Great Power forbids us from knowing more”, the Western Man figured he had to go further and further and voyage and discover the entire world, gain greater knowledge, increase his power to make man closer and closer to gods. Transhumanists want humans to merge with computers and machines and become godly. In a way, even white cucking before Negroes and Jews is a kind of Faustian Pact. Though masked as ‘social justice’ or ‘redress for white guilt’, it is about the fascination with Power. A white cuck man who lets a Negro do his woman is obsessed with the Power of the Gro. A white cuck collaborator of globalism is awed by Mighty Brew(hebrew) and want to play a role in it.. even if it means betraying his own race and people. Why not go and be with More Power with the Other race if one’s own race now seems rather lame and boring in flyover country? Globalism is a Faustian Pact where Divertocracy combines Diversity and Meritocracy. Bring together the best of all humanity to rule over all the world. So, superior Diversity will tower and rule over inferior Diversity. Exclusive Diversity(open only to talent) shall rule over Inclusive Diversity(open to all the losers of the world).

    Anyway, Jews in the West were also infected with the Faustian Bug. Traditionally, Jewish Covenant meant humility before God. But in the Faustian West, the Jewish Soul sought more and more and more power and knowledge, culminating in atomic explosion and computers. This secularized Faustian Covenant is exciting but also dangerous because it has turned into Jewish self-worship of their own power and prowess. With the fading of ideologies — seriously, who believes in communism anymore –, there is only the Power.
    David Cronenberg made two interesting films on the fusion of Jewish Way and Western Way. RABID has a blonde Aryan woman who is operated by a Jewish doctor. The fusion leads to an explosive outbreak of epidemic. DANGEROUS METHOD has Jewish Freud and Aryan Jung playing tug-o-war with some neurotic Jewish woman. The movie ends with a caption about WWII and Holocaust. It’s as if, just like the fusion of the Jewish and Aryan led to a great tragedy in RABID, the horrors of WWII was, at root, caused by Faustian friction of Aryan and Jews, two people with strong personalities.

    Even though the ‘Aryans’ led in Faustianism whereas Jews humbly worshiped the almighty God, the funny thing is Jews had more Faustian content hidden within their souls. Paradoxically in a way, Jews were so repressive of Faustianism because they were fearful that, if unloosed, it would go totally out of control. It’s like those guarding nuclear bombs have to be more cautious than those guarding conventional weapons. Use conventional weapons in a rash way and you mess up part of a city. Use nukes and the whole city blows up. So, Jewish humility was deceptive. After all, gods are projections of the soul of a people, and the fact that Jews projected onto the universe an all-knowing and all-powerful one and only God means that Jewish personality is inherently power-obsessed. This was so dangerous that Jews had to project the idea onto the universe and worship Him as God. What might happen if Jews with their powerful personalities were to worship themselves as gods? ‘Aryan’ faustianism was about being great heroes. Jewish faustianism could be about Jewish prophets as gods. In the Middle East, surrounded by religious Muslims, Jews also kept to their humility. But in the Faustian West where ‘Aryans’ were encouraged to be heroes of discovery and power, this was bound to have much greater impact on Jews. Once unloosed from their restraints, Jewish faustian soul outpaced that of ‘Aryans’. Those who seek to be heroes cannot compete with those who seek to be prophets, then gods. It’s same with Negroes. Greeks and Western world came up with athletic competition of Olympics. And they hoped to dominate and be heroes/champions. Negroes in Africa were into physical stuff too, but they were forced to be humble because if they chucked their spears in the wrong direction, their asses would be torn apart by lions or stomped by hippos. In Africa, there were reminders that, as tough as the negro be, other creatures could kick their ass. But in the West, white men wiped out all the dangerous animals. So, white man could believe that man could be the physical master by winning in sports. In Africa, the toughest black warrior could act big but then a gorilla or lion might jump out of the bush and remind him what a wussy he be. That kept blacks humble. I mean if a crocodile bites off your leg, you know what real physical power is. But in the West, where physical prowess was decided in the enclosure of the ring or stadium, man could act like he is the toughest hero. When whites competed against the more muscular blacks, blacks didn’t just kick the whitey’s butt. His pride was no longer checked by gorillas, lions, hippos, and elephants. The frightful reality of wild Africa had kept in check the Faustian spirit of the Negro, but in the West, it realized itself fully. Whites had created a safe human environment where white men could be win in sports and feel like ‘champion of the world’. Blacks beat whites and took over this arena, as with Muhammad Ali declaring himself the greatest.
    So, even though White Faustianism led the way, it was usurped in brain power and soul-power by Jews and in physical power and funky power by the Negro.

    Jews are now obsessed with Power. Sure, they do believe to some degree in justice and other stuff, but Jewish Power comes first. Also, power is addictive. People with power want more power. It’s like Stalin and Mao kept craving fore more power, purging any perceived rival and enemy and then making fake enemies just to purge them to feel more powerful. But, with Jews, the Power Obsession is more dangerous because, even in secularized form, they have the Covenant. It’s like the Kim Klan in North Korea. Mao and Stalin were crazy about power.. for a lifetime. Stalin was not into creating a dynasty. Mao had no plans to turn power to his kids or nephews. So, it was power-obsession of a lifetime. But the Kim Klan created a ridiculous covenant that tied the fate of North Korea with the Kim Klan. So, Kim the elder passed power to Kim to Junior who passed the power to Kim the Retard. If Kim the Elder had been like Stalin, his nation might have changed drastically after his death. But the Power obsession became familial, and this is the basis of much nuttery and paranoia among the Kim Klan. It’s not just about fear of North Korea being attacked by outsiders but about the fear of Kim Klan losing the special national covenant.
    Jews are very different from the rulers of North Korea, but they have one thing in common. Jews, like the Kims, have a bigger vision of power. Kims are no longer satisfied with power-for-a-lifetime. They want the power to remain in the Kim Klan forever.
    The big difference between white gentile elites and Jews is that the former thinks in terms of power-for-a-lifetime on individual basis whereas the latter thinks in terms of power-forever-for-our-tribe. So, even though Bill Gates or Warren Buffet love their money and power, they are not interested in the larger Anglo family or identity. It’s about themselves as successful individuals. Beyond themselves, they just see ‘humanity’. To be sure, they are more sensitive to Jews and blacks because Jews and blacks insist on their strong sense of identity and pride. Unlike Gates and Buffet, Jews are not content to be mere individuals with success over a lifetime. Their sense of Covenant, now Faustianized, wants supreme power to remain in the Jewish Tribe. And this is why they hate Putin and Trump so much. Under Putin-ism and Trumpism, Jews as individuals can make all the money and gain so much influence and etc. But Putinism and Trumpism suggest at(if not blatantly) the possibility of the rise of white gentile national identity. Now, some paranoid Jews may worry about gentile mobs with pitchforks, and the Charlottesville torchlight parade did freak them out. But that is not the main concern. The main concern is that EVEN IF whites don’t become anti-Jewish, their own sense of identity will make whites focus on their own interests than on serving Jewish interests. The faustianized Jewish Covenant is addicted to Jewish Supremacism. Because Jews don’t have the numbers despite their great wealth and privilege, their supremacism depends on the support of gentiles, especially the whites. Even if whites didn’t turn anti-Jewish, let alone ‘nazi’, but didn’t feel like supporting Jewish interests and agenda, Jewish power would diminish overnight. Also, it is this white submissivist near-worship of Jewish Power that forestalls criticism of Jewish Power.
    Indeed, the freakiest silence in the West is lack of honest discussion of Jewish Power. It is surreal because the whole point of a democracy is to loudly voice opposition or criticism to the biggest power. But there is such deafening silence about Jewish Power.

    Because Jews depend on White Submissivist support to maintain Jewish supremacist power, Jews must be especially harsh toward whites. If whites show any sign of identity or group-interest, it must be denounced as ‘vile’, ‘rabid’, ‘virulent’, ‘odious’, ‘toxic’, ‘divisive’, ‘ugly’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘nazi’, etc. Of course, Jews use carrots and sticks. For those whites who are with the Program, they are lauded as ‘progressive’, ‘caring’, ‘woke’, ‘compassionate’, ‘anti-hate’, etc. It’s like taming animals. If they disobey, punish them hard to show them who is boss. If they obey, pet them and shower them with affection.
    Be very insulting to whites who clamor for identity and be very smiley-faced to whites who cuck out totally and wag their tails.

    There was a time when Jews feared anti-Jewish elements because of threat of violence or endangerment. It was about survival. But now, Jews fear the fading of pro-Jewish sentiments because they are addicted to power. Jewish supremacism is fearful of anti-philosemitism than classic antisemtism. The main worry is that gentiles will be anti-Jewish but more pro-themselves than pro-Jewish.
    It’s like a hungry man will eat just to survive. It’s about life. But when he has more than he can eat and eats just for pleasure, he gets angry if he isn’t served the fanciest cake.
    Power has a similar kind of logic. When Japan faced the West in the 19th century, it had no grand designs. It was only worried about power. It was fearful of the West and desperately hoped to catch up just enough to be able to defend Japan and survive. But then, Japan toyed with the imperial game and lo and behold, even ‘defeated’ Russia and gained foothold over Northeast Asia. And then, they got addicted to becoming the dominant Asian power FOREVER and that meant preventing the rise of a unified modern China. So, the logic of power went from survival and defense to domination and supremacism. Japanese became so addicted to dominationism that they even risked a major war to cling to their ambition. The idea of retreating from China and just being a normal nation was no longer acceptable to the Japanese. So, a people had worried about survivalism became addicted to supremacism, and then, ONLY supremacism was acceptable and anything less was intolerable.

    As the US rules the world and as Jews rule the US, Jews rule the world. It is a dizzying kind of power. It is Faustian Covenant on steroids, and Jews now want it forever. Because Jews don’t see themselves as mere individuals or part of a generic humanity, their main identity is as Jews, and so, their sense of power remains tribal and supremacist. Jewish individuals are no longer satisfied with success as lone members of society. They want this power to remain with the Tribe to the end of time.

    Also, even though non-whites in the West may compete with Jews, they also come under the influence of Jews. This is esp true of East Asians who are such slavish servile dogs under PC. All those Asians in Ivy League schools become servitors of the Empire, just like all those non-whites who studied in Western colleges in the Age of Empire were turned into dutiful servitors of the empire. They were about the Queen than their own people.
    One problem back then was that white race-ism was a thing. So, even as non-whites were welcomed to study in Paris and London, they were so many reminders that they were not quite as good as White Folks.

    But now, non-whites who come to the West feel different because they are welcomed with open arms by Jews who really run the show. (At least officially with open arms since there is the issue of affirmative action that hurts Asians.) If non-whites who went to London or Paris in the past felt slighted and even disregarded by whites, they now feel they have the advantage over whites. After all, PC associates whites with ‘guilt’ and many other bad stuff. Also, they can’t help noticing that whites in white nations are now subjects under Jewish power. So, if non-whites side with Jews, they can rule over whites. Just look at the smug smirk on Fareed Zikavirus’ face. Or that lowlife Metha Suckasstu. Or guess who the editors of Harvard Crimson are:

    http://www.thecrimson.com/about/masthead/

    Servitors of the Jewish Empire. So, even as they may resent Jewish power, they know that it is Jewish Power over whites that has given them entry into the halls of power and privilege. They may serve under Jews but will serve OVER whites in white nations.

    Obama knew this well to as the editor of the Harvard Law Review. He had to serve under Jews but it meant serving over whites. Over-underclass.

    Anyway, what Jews fear most is White Identity. It’s no longer about Shoah. Jews are not fearful of survival. I mean even the most anti-Putin Jews admit Jews have it pretty good in Russia. The real problem is Jews are no longer fixated on survival but on supreme power. They are like Japan in the 1930s when its military was no longer about survival(from Western Imperialism) but about ensuring permanent Japanese domination over Asia.

    This is why Jews fear Alt Right more than anything. Alt Right is about White Identity. And that can lead to White Covenantism, their own sense of special destiny with History. And if whites serve their own identity, they will disregard that of Jews, and then Jewish supremacism will crumble. Jews will still succeed as individuals, but white nations will no longer have “Muh Israel” and “We Worship Jews” as their main themes.

    When a slave wants out of slavery, the master isn’t afraid of his survival. Rather, he fears the loss of his supremacist status to which he’d grown accustomed and addicted to.
    White Emancipation means end of white submissivism to Jewish supremacism. And White Covenantism, if such is possible, means a new kind of covenant that may surpass the power of Jewish Covenant since there are many more whites.

    Poland and Hungary are minor powers, so why are Jews so angry with them? Their nationalism is a kind of covenantism. Poles and Hungarians are saying their nations belong to them as holy lands, just like Israel is to Jews. This sounds fair and square. Jews and their nationalism, Hungarians and their nationalism. So, what is the problem?
    Jews are not satisfied with their own nation and own power. They are addicted to non-Jews serving Jews to maintain Jewish supremacism. And to ensure this, gentiles must forgo their sense of blood and soil to serve and honor the blood and soil of Jews as the one and only true nationalism.

    Every people need a Covenant with history. Look how this powerful idea enabled Jews to survive all kinds of storms through the worst of times. Covenantism will decide the history of mankind. Those who forge it will survive. Those who don’t will wash away into generic humanity or end up serving identities that retain powerful identities, like the Irish that now cuck to Jews and Negroes(and even Homos who redefined ‘pride’ to mean homo.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D

    I never learned how to really play the game,
     
    And yet you proceed to give us a 5,000 word essay on how Jews are like chess pieces. I am looking forward to AlphaZero's essays on this subject. Maybe AI will be racist but at least it will know what it is talking about.
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    Great essay, Priss Factor.

    Alt Right is about White Identity. And that can lead to White Covenantism, their own sense of special destiny with History …

    Covenantism will decide the history of mankind. Those who forge it will survive.
     
    Covenant — CALL THE SHIPS TO PORT — Northern Light

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwNgnWlS778

    https://youtu.be/IPiuuXh4RVo?t=13s
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. Steve, a major correction:

    “Polish nobility invited in Rhineland Jews”

    Yes, but the dominant events of that period involved massive
    expulsions of the Jews from Western Europe (with minor
    exceptions like Holland), including the German states.
    To understand the climate of opinion of that era, you could
    read Martin Luther’s treatise “On the Jews and their lies” (1543).
    Luther advocates that the Jewish schools and synagogues be set
    on fire, their property confiscated, and any remaining Jews expelled.
    As a result of the expulsions the Jews had nowhere else to go so they,
    like many dissidents of that era, ended up in Poland which was the
    first country of that era to proclaim religious liberty. Many Jewish
    scholars stated that there would be very few Jews left in the world
    today if Poland hadn’t given them refuge when they were being
    expelled from Western Europe.

    In a way, the Holocaust could be regarded as a second major (and more
    drastic) attempt by the Western Europeans to expel the Jews from
    Europe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Jews were recognized as a protected people superior to gentile peasants in the Polish constitution hundreds of years before Luther.
    >oh but feel bad because of this other thing that happened
    Okay, sure, but the original fact remains untouched.
    , @utu
    Poland which was the first country of that era to proclaim religious liberty

    Poor Poland. Who planted this crazy idea?

    However you are not correct. The religious liberty applied only to Christian religions and to nobles and gentry who opted of Calvinism or Lutheranism. Judaism was orthogonal to Christian squabbles. Jews belonged to entirely different category and no argument concerning religious liberty could be used to protect or harm Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Dmitry
    The whole of the European liberal elite is already doing this. Have you never watched the BBC, or picked up a French or Spanish newspaper?

    The US is an exception insofar as there are also a number (albeit a declining number) of liberals who support Israel (in Europe, it is almost only conservatives who support Israel).

    The whole of the European liberal elite is already doing this. Have you never watched the BBC, or picked up a French or Spanish newspaper?

    But and it’s a very big but, when push comes to shove, they are right behind the US in supporting Israel and condemning Iran and Russia.

    Action speaks louder than words.

    It’s like Saudis. Always bitching about justice for Palestinians, but always working with Israel under the table.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dfordoom

    But and it’s a very big but, when push comes to shove, they are right behind the US in supporting Israel and condemning Iran and Russia.
     
    To be fair that might be plain old-fashioned cowardice. When push comes to shove the European elites do what Washington tells them to do whether they like it or not. Just because a slave obeys his master's orders doesn't mean he agrees with them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. @Jack D

    It’s not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.
     
    First of all, I don't think that "contempt for Christian morality" is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as "contempt".

    2nd, I think it IS a leap. In the mind of most Jewish liberals one has nothing to do with the other. They don't think of the US as a zero sum game so that giving opportunity to minorities and immigrants TAKES opportunity way from whites. This is the whole (false) premise behind "affirmative action" - you are just giving some oppressed people who remind me of my oppressed ancestors a helping hand, you are not trying to hurt anyone and in fact you are not hurting anyone because of all of the wonderful benefits that immigrants and diversity will bring to us. This POV may be dead wrong, but it is not meant maliciously. They really do think this way.

    3rd, there is no "long-term [Jewish] project to diminish the cultural dominance of the "host". Going back to George Washington's letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO "host". America is not the goyim's world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.

    If you want to make unfounded leaps in your own bigoted mind, then go ahead, but don't impose imaginary viewpoints on the Jews. If what you are saying is real, show me the minutes of the Elders of Zion where this "project" is discussed or it didn't happen.

    >> What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as “contempt”.<<

    There you go again. Abortion is not a religious issue. It is a public policy issue. It is no more germane to religion than the prohibition against murder is. This statement is a not to clever sleight of hand on your part. The fact that some Christian denominations oppose abortion and that some of the congregants of these denominations wish to construct public policy to restrict or ban abortion is mere coincidence.

    Judaism as understood by many Jews is very unlike Christianity. One could say that the religion of Judaism moral framework is based on what is good for the Jews, and Jews, for some mysterious reason, have fixated on the idea that regulating abortion is bad for the Jews. It is the Jews who are obsessed with abortion, not the goyim.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. @Ian M.

    Maybe it’s not uniform but there is certainly a palpable current of disgust [among Jews] for middle-American types.
     
    This is also the case among the educated white gentile class.

    EXACTLY!

    A group of filthy rich pure blood descendants of Boston Brahmins will hate and despise Middle American whites (Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox; all ethnicities) as widely and deeply as do any group of Jews.

    And it is not just a coastal thing. George Will is from the midwest, the small college town midwest, and he despises almost all non-rich Middle American whites. Will’s contempt for deeply believing Southern Baptists is exceeded only by his contempt for deeply believing Catholics and deeply believing Eastern Orthodox.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ian M.
    Right. I went to college in the Midwest, and there was no shortage of white gentile Midwesterners who despised their roots.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. @Jack D

    It’s not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.
     
    First of all, I don't think that "contempt for Christian morality" is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as "contempt".

    2nd, I think it IS a leap. In the mind of most Jewish liberals one has nothing to do with the other. They don't think of the US as a zero sum game so that giving opportunity to minorities and immigrants TAKES opportunity way from whites. This is the whole (false) premise behind "affirmative action" - you are just giving some oppressed people who remind me of my oppressed ancestors a helping hand, you are not trying to hurt anyone and in fact you are not hurting anyone because of all of the wonderful benefits that immigrants and diversity will bring to us. This POV may be dead wrong, but it is not meant maliciously. They really do think this way.

    3rd, there is no "long-term [Jewish] project to diminish the cultural dominance of the "host". Going back to George Washington's letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO "host". America is not the goyim's world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.

    If you want to make unfounded leaps in your own bigoted mind, then go ahead, but don't impose imaginary viewpoints on the Jews. If what you are saying is real, show me the minutes of the Elders of Zion where this "project" is discussed or it didn't happen.

    >>We are all partners in the American project…….

    There is no American “project”. There is no American “experiment”. Have you ever heard of a Chinese, Mexican, Brazilian, French or Israeli project? Oh, I know, magic dirt.

    There used to be an American nation. Substantially, there still is one but it has been eclipsed by the American imperium. As went all empires, the American empire too will end in the “dust bin of history”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jack D
    I keep hearing about this pure American nation that once existed, but people who talk about it keep drawing the line further and further back (but not so far back that THEY are excluded) - "they all have to go back" apparently doesn't just mean Mexicans and Chinese - to get to a pure American nation you have to get rid of the Ellis Island Jews and Italians and Poles, etc. and then the pre-Civil War Irish and Germans. By the time you are done sending everyone back there will be like 10 people left in America and 5 of them will be black.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. @Altai
    'As Anti-Semitism Rises, ‘I Don’t Feel Safe in Australia,’ Rabbi Says'
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/26/world/australia/australia-anti-semitism-racism.html

    I wonder how safe the Rabbi feels in Anglo-Celtic Australian neighbourhoods versus Lebanese neighbourhoods...

    I wonder how safe he or his ancestors felt when they travelled half-way around the world to be in a much more blonde Australia. Because if I am to understand the logic, more white people = more white racism. Right?

    ‘As Anti-Semitism Rises, ‘I Don’t Feel Safe in Australia,’ Rabbi Says’

    I’d be happy to pay for his plane ticket if he wants to leave. I’ll even drive him to the airport.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. @JollyOldSoul
    "And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is."

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven't expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration? Parsons, Kansas is 16.7% Latino. A decade before then it wasn't even half that. We need immigrant doctors so we can treat immigrant patients (many of whom don't even have health insurance). We need immigrant Muslims to spy on other immigrant Muslims (and their children) who want to kill us. Sounds like a great plan.

    I dunno, because US medical schools haven’t expanded rapidly enough to account for the increasing population, which is largely the result of immigration?

    Could it have something to do with the fact that American universities are too busy teaching Gender Studies and similar nonsense and they just can’t spare the resources to teach trivial stuff like medicine and engineering?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. Steve, another major correction:

    “as imperial Russia gobbled up Poland”

    1. It didn’t gobble up ‘Poland.’ It annexed the
    eastern part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth,
    a vast highly decentralized federal republic (i.e.,
    early democracy) that comprised parts of today’s
    Lithuania, Belarus, and western Ukraine, although,
    indeed, it was dominated by Poland and its culture.

    2. It was actually two Germans, Frederick II of Prussia
    and Catherine II of Russia, who originated the
    annexations, one from the east and one from the west
    (with Austrians getting in on the action from the south).

    Steve, you should really learn to use the term Commonwealth
    (English equivalent of res publica), esp. because under Pilsudski
    a smaller version of the Commonwealth was established after
    WW I, and today’s Poland, with a massive influx of people
    from the east, is again moving in that direction.

    It is my contention (and I’m not the only one) that the Partitions
    of Poland started the process that resulted in WW I and the
    Bolshevik Revolution. Germany and Russia expanded their
    territory, and became neighbors, in the process developing
    delusions of grandeur, and eventually attacking each other.
    “Pride goeth before the fall.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon 2
    The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is important
    historically because it was the first major multicultural
    state in Europe (or perhaps even the world), i.e., it was
    multiethnic, multiconfessional, and multilingual.
    And yet contrary to "Diversity is our strength," it failed,
    showing that multiculturalism doesn't work.

    Some would argue that the Commonwealth might
    have survived it it were ruled by absolute monarchy
    and armed to the teeth, i.e., if it had been more like its
    neighbors Russia and Prussia. Perhaps, but then it
    would've had to abandon its parliamentary system.

    Who knows maybe the U.S. is moving in the direction
    of autocratic rule, comparable to that in Russia and
    China. Democracy and diversity seem profoundly
    incompatible
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. @Anon 2
    Steve, a major correction:

    "Polish nobility invited in Rhineland Jews"

    Yes, but the dominant events of that period involved massive
    expulsions of the Jews from Western Europe (with minor
    exceptions like Holland), including the German states.
    To understand the climate of opinion of that era, you could
    read Martin Luther's treatise "On the Jews and their lies" (1543).
    Luther advocates that the Jewish schools and synagogues be set
    on fire, their property confiscated, and any remaining Jews expelled.
    As a result of the expulsions the Jews had nowhere else to go so they,
    like many dissidents of that era, ended up in Poland which was the
    first country of that era to proclaim religious liberty. Many Jewish
    scholars stated that there would be very few Jews left in the world
    today if Poland hadn't given them refuge when they were being
    expelled from Western Europe.

    In a way, the Holocaust could be regarded as a second major (and more
    drastic) attempt by the Western Europeans to expel the Jews from
    Europe.

    Jews were recognized as a protected people superior to gentile peasants in the Polish constitution hundreds of years before Luther.
    >oh but feel bad because of this other thing that happened
    Okay, sure, but the original fact remains untouched.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. @Random Lurker
    I spoke with a right-wing rabbi in Israel who had an interesting theory which I will summarize and expand on:

    The Jews have been able to survive as a distinct people for thousands of years despite the oppression they suffered across the diaspora, precisely because of said oppression. The majority in each country never allowed the Jews to forget they were a (suspiciously) distinct people, and so they never did.

    By being such a largely welcoming and safe place for Jewish people, the United States is ironically a greater existential threat to The Jewish People. Modern American society views Jews first and foremost as American and White, so Jews have begun to see themselves as the same. And so we now have an intermarriage rate of 58% (71% among the non-Orthodox) and soaring assimilation.

    Ironically, if the rabid anti-semitism found in certain corners of the internet were to become mainstreamed into American society (as the alt-right seems to pine for) American Jews will begin again to see themselves first and foremost as Jewish, and fight-or-flight mode will kick in to overdrive.

    So my question to the Jew-haters in the comments section of Unz.com: are you hasbara agents or merely patsies?

    By being such a largely welcoming and safe place for Jewish people, the United States is ironically a greater existential threat to The Jewish People.

    Yep. In a perverse way Jews want to be hated. Their entire self-identity depends on it.

    Just as homosexuals want to be oppressed. Their existence as a distinctive sub-culture depends on it.

    Hatred is an excellent means of preserving group cohesion. Look at the Irish Catholics. For centuries the one thing that kept them going was their sense of being persecuted by the evil English. When the English stopped persecuting and oppressing them the Irish immediately began to commit national suicide.

    Christianity grew rapidly when it was persecuted, or when Christians believed they had real enemies who hated them. By the end of the seventeenth century the Islamic threat to Europe was over. Christianity immediately began to decline.

    The good news for Christians is that they now once again have enemies who hate them and want to destroy them – liberals. And it is increasingly obvious that liberals intend to start actively persecuting Christians. This may be the only thing that can save Christianity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moses

    Yep. In a perverse way Jews want to be hated. Their entire self-identity depends on it.

    Just as homosexuals want to be oppressed. Their existence as a distinctive sub-culture depends on it.

    Hatred is an excellent means of preserving group cohesion.
     

    This is right on.

    Jewish in-group identity *depends* on "being hated" or at least being an alien minority. If others don't hate them they will find ways to be hated. It's built into their operating system. Thank goodness (for them) that Israel is surrounded by Arab enemies who want to destroy them instead of located in, say, western Canada. The Old Testament shows their need for enemies in abundance.

    They've been kicked out of dozens of countries, repeatedly, throughout history. They are the only group as far as I know to have that happen to them.

    But the problem is always everyone else, never them.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  130. @Anon
    New Yorkers do NOT want you to restrict immigrants or harass Muslims due to incident in NYC. They are vital part of our economy & society.

    Okay, let's play the Jewish game. Let's praise and honor Muslims. Let's call for ending all wars to destroy Muslim nations. Let's stick up for the right of Palestinians. Let's call for BDS and let's denounce efforts to criminalize it. Muslims are so precious and valuable. We must stop favoring Jewish/Zionist interests over Muslim or Arab ones.

    Since Jews preach that Muslims are so very dear, let's play their game. Let's stop favoring Jews over Muslims, Israel over Muslim world. See how much Jews like that.

    And don’t forget the $4billion yearly stipend for Israel. We could end that too and see what happens.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carbon blob
    [snark]
    Can't do that, Israel is an ally and a precious source of intelligence and military support against those barbarians in Iran who seek to exterminate our ally Israel.
    [/snark]
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. @Anon 2
    Steve, another major correction:

    "as imperial Russia gobbled up Poland"

    1. It didn't gobble up 'Poland.' It annexed the
    eastern part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth,
    a vast highly decentralized federal republic (i.e.,
    early democracy) that comprised parts of today's
    Lithuania, Belarus, and western Ukraine, although,
    indeed, it was dominated by Poland and its culture.

    2. It was actually two Germans, Frederick II of Prussia
    and Catherine II of Russia, who originated the
    annexations, one from the east and one from the west
    (with Austrians getting in on the action from the south).

    Steve, you should really learn to use the term Commonwealth
    (English equivalent of res publica), esp. because under Pilsudski
    a smaller version of the Commonwealth was established after
    WW I, and today's Poland, with a massive influx of people
    from the east, is again moving in that direction.

    It is my contention (and I'm not the only one) that the Partitions
    of Poland started the process that resulted in WW I and the
    Bolshevik Revolution. Germany and Russia expanded their
    territory, and became neighbors, in the process developing
    delusions of grandeur, and eventually attacking each other.
    "Pride goeth before the fall."

    The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is important
    historically because it was the first major multicultural
    state in Europe (or perhaps even the world), i.e., it was
    multiethnic, multiconfessional, and multilingual.
    And yet contrary to “Diversity is our strength,” it failed,
    showing that multiculturalism doesn’t work.

    Some would argue that the Commonwealth might
    have survived it it were ruled by absolute monarchy
    and armed to the teeth, i.e., if it had been more like its
    neighbors Russia and Prussia. Perhaps, but then it
    would’ve had to abandon its parliamentary system.

    Who knows maybe the U.S. is moving in the direction
    of autocratic rule, comparable to that in Russia and
    China. Democracy and diversity seem profoundly
    incompatible

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. @Anonymous
    Trump is a loose cannon. Unpredictable and uncontrollable.

    Unpredictable: Mercurial character. Nice today but possibly mean tomorrow. You can never know.

    Uncontrollable: He gained the presidency by his own means, bypassing the usual Republican fundraising/campaigning machinery, as well as the traditional media. He can do as he pleases.

    In some ways, don’t those qualities make him an effective negotiator and therefore national leader.

    I’ve heard the best negotiators in the business discuss the importance of unpredictability. Seems like a national leader should have the same qualities as a master negotiator under the international law of the jungle.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  134. @Random Lurker
    I spoke with a right-wing rabbi in Israel who had an interesting theory which I will summarize and expand on:

    The Jews have been able to survive as a distinct people for thousands of years despite the oppression they suffered across the diaspora, precisely because of said oppression. The majority in each country never allowed the Jews to forget they were a (suspiciously) distinct people, and so they never did.

    By being such a largely welcoming and safe place for Jewish people, the United States is ironically a greater existential threat to The Jewish People. Modern American society views Jews first and foremost as American and White, so Jews have begun to see themselves as the same. And so we now have an intermarriage rate of 58% (71% among the non-Orthodox) and soaring assimilation.

    Ironically, if the rabid anti-semitism found in certain corners of the internet were to become mainstreamed into American society (as the alt-right seems to pine for) American Jews will begin again to see themselves first and foremost as Jewish, and fight-or-flight mode will kick in to overdrive.

    So my question to the Jew-haters in the comments section of Unz.com: are you hasbara agents or merely patsies?

    The Jews have been able to survive as a distinct people for thousands of years despite the oppression they suffered across the diaspora, precisely because of said oppression.

    An ahistorical proposition, apocryphal.

    There are so many Jews because they liked to proeslytize heavily and openly. All this “thousands of years” and “diaspora” stuff is Star Wars level of bullshit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. @Anon
    I never learned how to really play the game, but chess is a useful metaphor for Jewish Power.

    Not only are there different levels of mastery but different chess pieces have different roles serving various layers of power.

    Not all Jews play the Game of Power at high levels. Some are either dumb, mediocre, or too hotheaded to see the bigger picture. Uncontrolled personality can override and destroy even high IQ people. Norman Mailer nearly destroyed his career by stabbing his wife. Had she died, his career would have suffered a great setback. Roman Polanski ended up in exile because he couldn't control his boing, a rather perverse one at that. Kubrick was smart to remove himself from the temptations. It's like Dylan retreated to some suburb in Woodstock for awhile when things got too crazy.

    In chess, there is the gambit that looks like a bad move but actually sets up for something bigger down the line. So, what seems like Jewish stupidity or short-sightedness could be a gambit. It's like in HOUSE OF GAMES and GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS. The winners can see a little more ahead than the other guy. Even without the good leads, they have mental leads. They can use empathy to emotionally gauge the other characters. And it's not just about a cold dry game but about emotions. How to manipulate emotions. The woman in HOUSE OF GAMES is conned not only by the brilliance of the huckster but his charms and flattery of her own repressed ego.

    Among the chess pieces, the lowest are the pawns. Some Jews are just pawns. The low-level Jews, the antifa bottomfeeder type and SJW dummies. They think stupidly and act dumbly... just like pawns in chess, but they can be effective in short bursts or their madness can serve as blocking tactics. Antifa terror suppresses Free Speech by nationalists, esp as Antifa and SJW get special protection from the Police as seen in Berkeley and Charlottesville. So, pawns are useful to the Power.



    But there are other pieces.

    Neocons are like the knights/horses. They are unpredictable. They are supposed to be 'conservative', but their motions always turn this way or that way. They seem to be moving forward but one can't tell which way they will hook, left or right. Also, Neocons, as 'conservatives' who work(often very well) with Liberal Zionists, jump over the understood boundaries. Neocons jump from left to right to left to right.

    Jewish Media are like bishops. Bishops are mercurial and slip diagonally all across the board. When straight lanes are blocked, bishops can slip in sideways. And media are like that. As its signals go all over the place, it permeates into every household. Con or Lib, any American who turns on the radio or TV or even internet(due to ethno-monopoly control of platforms that work with ADL), come under the power of Jewish bishop power.

    Jewish Power in Deep State and institutions like Academia are like Rooks. Less obvious and mobile than bishop power when the board is cluttered but more solid and substantive. They are the bastions of power that give directives to the media on what can be said and can't be said.

    Jewish oligarchic power is like the Queen. Super-rich Jews can exert tremendous power by donating to colleges, buying up politicians, funding certain kind of activists(in NGO's), and spreading cash all around. Just think of what a sole Adelson or Soros can do. A lot.

    And then, there is the King. The King is chess is the most important piece, but it also the most vulnerable piece without much direct power. But if it goes, all else goes. Even if you got rooks, bishops, knights, and queen, a checkmate is checkmate. It's game over. On that basis, the King is the most important piece even though, in some ways, it is the most ineffective and weakest piece.
    And this goes for Jews. The most important thing for Jews is the Covenant, though it's been secularized in recent times.

    In some ways, what is most valuable to Jews is the idea of the Covenant(with God, History, Destiny, etc). Without it, Jewishness cannot exist. Without it, there would have been no plan to regain the Holy Land. Jews have gained a lot in history and then lost nearly everything.. but they carried on. Why? The Covenant. So, if a billionaire Jew loses every penny but retains the Covenant, he still has Jewishness that can be passed down through the generations. It is priceless. Because the Covenant isn't one individual or institution, it has no practical or applicable power. It's not like the military or money. But it's the thing that gives Jews a sense of center and serves as a compass in their navigation through space and time. It's like no matter how big a ship with how many crew and how many guns, the ships in the Voyage of Discovery would have been lost without the compass or other means to gauge direction.

    The Covenant is a strange and paradoxical thing. It keeps Jews humble but also most arrogant and megalomaniacal. As a pact with God, they must bow down before the Lord. Among secular Jews, the Covenant is with History and/or Justice, like Marx with theory of class and revolution. The covenant is humbling because it says Jews must serve something bigger than themselves, be it God or History or Humanity or Justice or Truth or some such. But it is also arrogant because it gives Jews the sense that they have a special place in history. Jews feel that without them, the world would be missing the axle. Wheels will spin out in all directions. Jews need to hold everything together because they and only they understand and see the Big Picture. This paradox was there in Jesus Himself, who was the most humble Man before God but also the most megalomaniacal Man who ever lived, claiming to be Son of God and God Himself.

    Jews are humbled by the Covenant because it allowed them to survive and carry on even when everything seemed lost. Even when all their fortunes were gone and their cities burned down, they had this special identity and sense of place in the universe.
    But because the Covenant proved their resilience and ability to comeback from the direst setbacks and tragedies(and because it connected them with the Laws of the Universe), it made them feel as the most special people.

    This Covenant cannot be owned by a single Jew, yet it belongs to every Jew as an individual soul. In pagan myths, if a man is favored by gods and made great as a demi-god-like figure, it is a favor bestowed onto him alone. But in the story of Abraham, what was given to Abraham is to be passed down the generations as a fire in the soul. It is the one equalizer between the richest Jew and poorest Jew, happiest Jew living in freedom and unhappiest Jew living in bondage. The Covenant reminds the poorest Jew that he could rise to the top because he is of the special Tribe. It also reminds the richest Jew that his life still has meaning and value because, even if he loses everything, he still has the Covenant that links him with God or History.

    Without the Covenant, Jews could not have risen so powerfully(as a People and Power than as mere individuals) after WWII and Shoah.
    Also, it is the ONLY thing that can last indefinitely. The richest and most powerful Jews today will die in a few decades. Soros and Adelson can't live forever. And there's no telling what their children will do the fortunes. No one lives forever. Radical individualism is dumb hubris. But Covenant is forever. It was around 2000 yrs ago and it can remain 2000 yrs from now if Jews pass it down generation after generation.

    So, to understand the psychological roots of Jewish Power, we need to focus on the King piece, the Covenant. It is almost invisible like the King in chess as it's hardly moved and often hidden via 'castling'. And yet, it is the source of Jewish Power through the ages. Without the Covenant, there can be rich and successful Jewish individuals who exert individual power, much like Bill Gates or Tim Cook does. But individual power is only for a lifetime whereas Covenant Power is for all time. Indeed, notice how even Cook and his ilk serve Jewish Power since it exists as a focus of identity. Cook may serve himself as a successful individual but when it comes to 'something bigger than myself', he defers to Jewish power of ADL because it exists as a Covenant, an Idea, an ageless ethno-proposition.
    Suppose there are 100 Irishmen and 100 Poles. Suppose 100 Irishmen have lost interest in their Irishness and just see themselves as either lone individuals or part of generic humanity. In contrast, suppose Poles cling to their sense of Polishness with pride and prestige. Over time, even the Irish individuals will come to serve and honor Polishness because it retains its force as an identity. It's like if you have two big blocks of magnets and if you keep one magnet whole while breaking the other magnet into tiny little individual pieces, the tiny little pieces will gravitate to the big magnet and stick to it. Why are Anglos in Canada and Irish in Ireland celebrating Black History Month? Why are they into Holocaust Cult Worship? Because having cucked out their own identity as 'white bread' and 'boring', they either see themselves as lone individuals(the Irish 'right') or as generic humanity(the Irish 'left'). Since genericism lacks direction, it is attracted to Other identities that retain its center and meaning. Since blackness is into 'yo, I be badass and kick butt and hump every ho', the cucked out whites are gravitating toward blackness. And some even turn to Islam since it remains a viable and powerful spiritual ideology. Christianity has become so generic that it caves to Homomania among Liberal christos or to Zionism among Conzo christos. "Muh holy homos" or "Muh holy Israel".

    If Jews were to lose or abandon the Covenant, they could still be rich and successful, like many Wasps are. But they would have no power beyond that of individuals. Bill Gates is a very rich man and has power of money and position. But he is not part of any power as a people, culture, or tribe. He may claim to be of the Geek Tribe, but geeks serve technology and don't live forever.

    And this is why Jews are pissed with Putin and Trump. Jews know neither Putin or Trump intends to hold Nazi rallies and send Jews to death camps. They don't even intend to take away Jewish property. Even with Putin's pro-Russian economic policies, many of the super-rich in Russia are Jewish or non-Russian. Some are even Muslim.
    So, why are Jews so upset? Because gentile nationalism is a nascent kind of gentile covenantism. The thing is a people cannot serve two covenants. For a long time, Jews were into serving their own Covenant and just getting along with goyim, thought to be different or even filthy(by some Jews). And in the Middle East, it seems Jews were successful but knew their place and were tolerated and didn't get Too Big. In the Ottoman Empire, Jews were among the successful minority middlemen along with Greeks and Armenians. In such places, Jews sought success but not total control. Muslim World remained under the power of Islam. And Jews in the Middle East were more traditional and remained humble before their own traditions.

    But things were different in the West. I don't know about the virtues of INTERSTELLAR, which I failed to finish watching because I don't think 'corn is good' is a very inspiring idea. But this article gets at something about the West.

    https://altright.com/2017/12/11/is-interstellar-a-movie-about-the-faustian-soul-of-the-white-race/

    The West developed a Faustian soul, and it goes back to Greek mythology and Germanic mythology. It's what Joseph Campbell talks about. It's the soul's equivalent of breaking the Sound Barrier. According to traditional Judaism, there is nothing greater than God, and Jews better watch out.. or else they'll end up like Edward G. Robinson in THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. If Howard Stern, Harvey Weinstein, and Ron Jeremy had given lip to Moses, they would have been wiped out too with the help of Yahweh.
    And Islam means Submission. Allah is great and man is little and he better know his place.
    There is an element of humility in Christianity certainly. But it is also the story of Jesus the Man becoming God. It also about Saul-as-Paul playing the Promethean-Faustian figure and stealing the holy fire of the Jews and passing it off to gentiles and making that New Fire burn brighter and stronger than that of the Jews. Also, a Faustian Pact was made between the most pacifist of religions and most fiercest of all warrior races. Roman Empire collapse physically but survived and gained supremacy over all of Europe spiritually. Barbarians physically overran Rome, but the Roman Church spiritually spread its fire to the darkest and coldest corners of Europe. And Classical Learning, esp after revival during the Renaissance, set the white race onto a Faustian path. Unlike other peoples who accepted certain truths to be timeless, ultimate, and final, the Western Man kept on pushing the boundaries of what is knowable. Unlike other races who felt, "We know enough and the Great Power forbids us from knowing more", the Western Man figured he had to go further and further and voyage and discover the entire world, gain greater knowledge, increase his power to make man closer and closer to gods. Transhumanists want humans to merge with computers and machines and become godly. In a way, even white cucking before Negroes and Jews is a kind of Faustian Pact. Though masked as 'social justice' or 'redress for white guilt', it is about the fascination with Power. A white cuck man who lets a Negro do his woman is obsessed with the Power of the Gro. A white cuck collaborator of globalism is awed by Mighty Brew(hebrew) and want to play a role in it.. even if it means betraying his own race and people. Why not go and be with More Power with the Other race if one's own race now seems rather lame and boring in flyover country? Globalism is a Faustian Pact where Divertocracy combines Diversity and Meritocracy. Bring together the best of all humanity to rule over all the world. So, superior Diversity will tower and rule over inferior Diversity. Exclusive Diversity(open only to talent) shall rule over Inclusive Diversity(open to all the losers of the world).

    Anyway, Jews in the West were also infected with the Faustian Bug. Traditionally, Jewish Covenant meant humility before God. But in the Faustian West, the Jewish Soul sought more and more and more power and knowledge, culminating in atomic explosion and computers. This secularized Faustian Covenant is exciting but also dangerous because it has turned into Jewish self-worship of their own power and prowess. With the fading of ideologies -- seriously, who believes in communism anymore --, there is only the Power.
    David Cronenberg made two interesting films on the fusion of Jewish Way and Western Way. RABID has a blonde Aryan woman who is operated by a Jewish doctor. The fusion leads to an explosive outbreak of epidemic. DANGEROUS METHOD has Jewish Freud and Aryan Jung playing tug-o-war with some neurotic Jewish woman. The movie ends with a caption about WWII and Holocaust. It's as if, just like the fusion of the Jewish and Aryan led to a great tragedy in RABID, the horrors of WWII was, at root, caused by Faustian friction of Aryan and Jews, two people with strong personalities.

    Even though the 'Aryans' led in Faustianism whereas Jews humbly worshiped the almighty God, the funny thing is Jews had more Faustian content hidden within their souls. Paradoxically in a way, Jews were so repressive of Faustianism because they were fearful that, if unloosed, it would go totally out of control. It's like those guarding nuclear bombs have to be more cautious than those guarding conventional weapons. Use conventional weapons in a rash way and you mess up part of a city. Use nukes and the whole city blows up. So, Jewish humility was deceptive. After all, gods are projections of the soul of a people, and the fact that Jews projected onto the universe an all-knowing and all-powerful one and only God means that Jewish personality is inherently power-obsessed. This was so dangerous that Jews had to project the idea onto the universe and worship Him as God. What might happen if Jews with their powerful personalities were to worship themselves as gods? 'Aryan' faustianism was about being great heroes. Jewish faustianism could be about Jewish prophets as gods. In the Middle East, surrounded by religious Muslims, Jews also kept to their humility. But in the Faustian West where 'Aryans' were encouraged to be heroes of discovery and power, this was bound to have much greater impact on Jews. Once unloosed from their restraints, Jewish faustian soul outpaced that of 'Aryans'. Those who seek to be heroes cannot compete with those who seek to be prophets, then gods. It's same with Negroes. Greeks and Western world came up with athletic competition of Olympics. And they hoped to dominate and be heroes/champions. Negroes in Africa were into physical stuff too, but they were forced to be humble because if they chucked their spears in the wrong direction, their asses would be torn apart by lions or stomped by hippos. In Africa, there were reminders that, as tough as the negro be, other creatures could kick their ass. But in the West, white men wiped out all the dangerous animals. So, white man could believe that man could be the physical master by winning in sports. In Africa, the toughest black warrior could act big but then a gorilla or lion might jump out of the bush and remind him what a wussy he be. That kept blacks humble. I mean if a crocodile bites off your leg, you know what real physical power is. But in the West, where physical prowess was decided in the enclosure of the ring or stadium, man could act like he is the toughest hero. When whites competed against the more muscular blacks, blacks didn't just kick the whitey's butt. His pride was no longer checked by gorillas, lions, hippos, and elephants. The frightful reality of wild Africa had kept in check the Faustian spirit of the Negro, but in the West, it realized itself fully. Whites had created a safe human environment where white men could be win in sports and feel like 'champion of the world'. Blacks beat whites and took over this arena, as with Muhammad Ali declaring himself the greatest.
    So, even though White Faustianism led the way, it was usurped in brain power and soul-power by Jews and in physical power and funky power by the Negro.

    Jews are now obsessed with Power. Sure, they do believe to some degree in justice and other stuff, but Jewish Power comes first. Also, power is addictive. People with power want more power. It's like Stalin and Mao kept craving fore more power, purging any perceived rival and enemy and then making fake enemies just to purge them to feel more powerful. But, with Jews, the Power Obsession is more dangerous because, even in secularized form, they have the Covenant. It's like the Kim Klan in North Korea. Mao and Stalin were crazy about power.. for a lifetime. Stalin was not into creating a dynasty. Mao had no plans to turn power to his kids or nephews. So, it was power-obsession of a lifetime. But the Kim Klan created a ridiculous covenant that tied the fate of North Korea with the Kim Klan. So, Kim the elder passed power to Kim to Junior who passed the power to Kim the Retard. If Kim the Elder had been like Stalin, his nation might have changed drastically after his death. But the Power obsession became familial, and this is the basis of much nuttery and paranoia among the Kim Klan. It's not just about fear of North Korea being attacked by outsiders but about the fear of Kim Klan losing the special national covenant.
    Jews are very different from the rulers of North Korea, but they have one thing in common. Jews, like the Kims, have a bigger vision of power. Kims are no longer satisfied with power-for-a-lifetime. They want the power to remain in the Kim Klan forever.
    The big difference between white gentile elites and Jews is that the former thinks in terms of power-for-a-lifetime on individual basis whereas the latter thinks in terms of power-forever-for-our-tribe. So, even though Bill Gates or Warren Buffet love their money and power, they are not interested in the larger Anglo family or identity. It's about themselves as successful individuals. Beyond themselves, they just see 'humanity'. To be sure, they are more sensitive to Jews and blacks because Jews and blacks insist on their strong sense of identity and pride. Unlike Gates and Buffet, Jews are not content to be mere individuals with success over a lifetime. Their sense of Covenant, now Faustianized, wants supreme power to remain in the Jewish Tribe. And this is why they hate Putin and Trump so much. Under Putin-ism and Trumpism, Jews as individuals can make all the money and gain so much influence and etc. But Putinism and Trumpism suggest at(if not blatantly) the possibility of the rise of white gentile national identity. Now, some paranoid Jews may worry about gentile mobs with pitchforks, and the Charlottesville torchlight parade did freak them out. But that is not the main concern. The main concern is that EVEN IF whites don't become anti-Jewish, their own sense of identity will make whites focus on their own interests than on serving Jewish interests. The faustianized Jewish Covenant is addicted to Jewish Supremacism. Because Jews don't have the numbers despite their great wealth and privilege, their supremacism depends on the support of gentiles, especially the whites. Even if whites didn't turn anti-Jewish, let alone 'nazi', but didn't feel like supporting Jewish interests and agenda, Jewish power would diminish overnight. Also, it is this white submissivist near-worship of Jewish Power that forestalls criticism of Jewish Power.
    Indeed, the freakiest silence in the West is lack of honest discussion of Jewish Power. It is surreal because the whole point of a democracy is to loudly voice opposition or criticism to the biggest power. But there is such deafening silence about Jewish Power.

    Because Jews depend on White Submissivist support to maintain Jewish supremacist power, Jews must be especially harsh toward whites. If whites show any sign of identity or group-interest, it must be denounced as 'vile', 'rabid', 'virulent', 'odious', 'toxic', 'divisive', 'ugly', 'white supremacist', 'nazi', etc. Of course, Jews use carrots and sticks. For those whites who are with the Program, they are lauded as 'progressive', 'caring', 'woke', 'compassionate', 'anti-hate', etc. It's like taming animals. If they disobey, punish them hard to show them who is boss. If they obey, pet them and shower them with affection.
    Be very insulting to whites who clamor for identity and be very smiley-faced to whites who cuck out totally and wag their tails.

    There was a time when Jews feared anti-Jewish elements because of threat of violence or endangerment. It was about survival. But now, Jews fear the fading of pro-Jewish sentiments because they are addicted to power. Jewish supremacism is fearful of anti-philosemitism than classic antisemtism. The main worry is that gentiles will be anti-Jewish but more pro-themselves than pro-Jewish.
    It's like a hungry man will eat just to survive. It's about life. But when he has more than he can eat and eats just for pleasure, he gets angry if he isn't served the fanciest cake.
    Power has a similar kind of logic. When Japan faced the West in the 19th century, it had no grand designs. It was only worried about power. It was fearful of the West and desperately hoped to catch up just enough to be able to defend Japan and survive. But then, Japan toyed with the imperial game and lo and behold, even 'defeated' Russia and gained foothold over Northeast Asia. And then, they got addicted to becoming the dominant Asian power FOREVER and that meant preventing the rise of a unified modern China. So, the logic of power went from survival and defense to domination and supremacism. Japanese became so addicted to dominationism that they even risked a major war to cling to their ambition. The idea of retreating from China and just being a normal nation was no longer acceptable to the Japanese. So, a people had worried about survivalism became addicted to supremacism, and then, ONLY supremacism was acceptable and anything less was intolerable.

    As the US rules the world and as Jews rule the US, Jews rule the world. It is a dizzying kind of power. It is Faustian Covenant on steroids, and Jews now want it forever. Because Jews don't see themselves as mere individuals or part of a generic humanity, their main identity is as Jews, and so, their sense of power remains tribal and supremacist. Jewish individuals are no longer satisfied with success as lone members of society. They want this power to remain with the Tribe to the end of time.

    Also, even though non-whites in the West may compete with Jews, they also come under the influence of Jews. This is esp true of East Asians who are such slavish servile dogs under PC. All those Asians in Ivy League schools become servitors of the Empire, just like all those non-whites who studied in Western colleges in the Age of Empire were turned into dutiful servitors of the empire. They were about the Queen than their own people.
    One problem back then was that white race-ism was a thing. So, even as non-whites were welcomed to study in Paris and London, they were so many reminders that they were not quite as good as White Folks.

    But now, non-whites who come to the West feel different because they are welcomed with open arms by Jews who really run the show. (At least officially with open arms since there is the issue of affirmative action that hurts Asians.) If non-whites who went to London or Paris in the past felt slighted and even disregarded by whites, they now feel they have the advantage over whites. After all, PC associates whites with 'guilt' and many other bad stuff. Also, they can't help noticing that whites in white nations are now subjects under Jewish power. So, if non-whites side with Jews, they can rule over whites. Just look at the smug smirk on Fareed Zikavirus' face. Or that lowlife Metha Suckasstu. Or guess who the editors of Harvard Crimson are:

    http://www.thecrimson.com/about/masthead/

    Servitors of the Jewish Empire. So, even as they may resent Jewish power, they know that it is Jewish Power over whites that has given them entry into the halls of power and privilege. They may serve under Jews but will serve OVER whites in white nations.

    Obama knew this well to as the editor of the Harvard Law Review. He had to serve under Jews but it meant serving over whites. Over-underclass.

    Anyway, what Jews fear most is White Identity. It's no longer about Shoah. Jews are not fearful of survival. I mean even the most anti-Putin Jews admit Jews have it pretty good in Russia. The real problem is Jews are no longer fixated on survival but on supreme power. They are like Japan in the 1930s when its military was no longer about survival(from Western Imperialism) but about ensuring permanent Japanese domination over Asia.

    This is why Jews fear Alt Right more than anything. Alt Right is about White Identity. And that can lead to White Covenantism, their own sense of special destiny with History. And if whites serve their own identity, they will disregard that of Jews, and then Jewish supremacism will crumble. Jews will still succeed as individuals, but white nations will no longer have "Muh Israel" and "We Worship Jews" as their main themes.

    When a slave wants out of slavery, the master isn't afraid of his survival. Rather, he fears the loss of his supremacist status to which he'd grown accustomed and addicted to.
    White Emancipation means end of white submissivism to Jewish supremacism. And White Covenantism, if such is possible, means a new kind of covenant that may surpass the power of Jewish Covenant since there are many more whites.

    Poland and Hungary are minor powers, so why are Jews so angry with them? Their nationalism is a kind of covenantism. Poles and Hungarians are saying their nations belong to them as holy lands, just like Israel is to Jews. This sounds fair and square. Jews and their nationalism, Hungarians and their nationalism. So, what is the problem?
    Jews are not satisfied with their own nation and own power. They are addicted to non-Jews serving Jews to maintain Jewish supremacism. And to ensure this, gentiles must forgo their sense of blood and soil to serve and honor the blood and soil of Jews as the one and only true nationalism.

    Every people need a Covenant with history. Look how this powerful idea enabled Jews to survive all kinds of storms through the worst of times. Covenantism will decide the history of mankind. Those who forge it will survive. Those who don't will wash away into generic humanity or end up serving identities that retain powerful identities, like the Irish that now cuck to Jews and Negroes(and even Homos who redefined 'pride' to mean homo.)

    I never learned how to really play the game,

    And yet you proceed to give us a 5,000 word essay on how Jews are like chess pieces. I am looking forward to AlphaZero’s essays on this subject. Maybe AI will be racist but at least it will know what it is talking about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas
    I'd say he hit a Home Run, but I never played in the majors so I suppose I'd better just not bother . . .
    , @Anon
    "And yet you proceed to give us a 5,000 word essay on how Jews are like chess"

    It was an analogy.

    Your argument is fallacious. You needn't have actually fought in the Vietnam War to understand why it didn't work out.

    And AI is just as likely to be anti-Semitic as it is likely to be racist.
    , @Anon
    Most people can't play sports but they have opinions about it.

    Most people can't play music but have views on music.

    PS. This guy had an interesting life.

    https://www.chess.com/news/view/viktor-korchnoi-1931-2016-1214
    , @AnotherDad

    Going back to George Washington’s letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO “host”. America is not the goyim’s world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.
     
    One can argue whether "host" is appropriate. Perhaps not. But i'm more Irish Catholic than any other component, and I certainly understand that the US is at core an Anglo-Protestant nation, created by Anglo-Protestants, according to Anglo-Protestant ideas. (Pretty darn good ideas!)

    We are all capable (in theory) of being part of "the project". But absent that core, "there is no there there". It's just a pig pile of people ruled by the bossy super-state. (Which i'm feeling in spades this week with AnotherMom and I trying to find some health coverage that doesn't break the bank and yet qualifies me to avoid a brutish tax penalty.)

    ~~~

    Jack, you should carefully read Washington's letter to the Touro Synagogue. A few other bits are worth of note:

    May the children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig-tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.
     
    *Own* vine and fig tree. Nothing in there about Jews--or Catholics or Muslims or anyone else--being entitled to entrance to Protestant Universities, which we here endless whining about. Nothing about country club admissions policy either.


    For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.
     
    *Good citizens*. And although "it" here in this particular sentence refers to the government of the US, I think Washington believed the "support" was more broad than that--i.e. to the nation.

    A paramount requirement to be a good citizen is to be loyal to your fellow citizens. To consider their public interests along with your own. To consider yourself to be on the same "team" with them. This is what a good number of Jews utterly fail to do.

    There are certainly plenty of loyal Jews--Mickey Kaus and Stephen Miller come to mind as guys I perceive as being on my American team. (Guys i'd want in my foxhole.) But huge numbers of Jews fail this loyalty test. And not just selfishly as in "what's good for the Jews" but often seemingly to be perversely disloyal--a la Brett Stephens--with active contempt for goy Americans and a desire to trash their interests. If you're confused about where all these "anti-semities" keep coming from, this is where you should look.

    George Washington was a stand up classy gentleman. A man of good heart and good character and was demonstrating his broadmindedness here. He was perhaps naïve about the Jews and how much broadminded loyalty would be coming back. He was certainly unknowing about the attitudes of Ostjuden who would be flooding in 100 years hence. I think if Washington saw the behavior of American Jews today--and attitudes toward their fellow citizens--he'd certainly be appalled and might be inclined to go back and kick the Jews out to save his republic.
    , @AnotherDad

    What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else.
     
    LOL. This is with a straight face?

    Jews have been far more active--at least an order of magnitude--in imposing their morality on the goyim than vice versa. And they--unlike the Christians--have been actually successful, have actually *imposed* their morality, not just talked about it. Generally Jews, with much higher verbal IQs are better at marketing and making it a "this is not who we are" thing. But in the last generation--I guess copying Christians--you hear a lot more explicit citation of the Talmud for some tradition or nation wrecking policy being a moral imperative.

    The scales are so overwhelmingly tilted toward the Jews even an idiot like Joe Biden can see it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Steve and the commentariat here know who the Jews are, but most Americans don’t. The wife and I chat about the news regularly. We keep it light. So when the groping scandal came up I mentioned that most the accused are, curiously, Jews. She had no clue about this. But I don’t think she would have guessed as much if they all had names like Marvin Finkelstein. This is commonplace.

    I am somewhat woke on this, but didn’t know until I looked it up, that Dinah Shore and Goldie Hawn were/are Jews. You can play the game here:

    http://www.jewornotjew.com

    I have a German last name. Most Americans with my last name are Jews. I am not. I usually get some ‘Happy Hanakkahs’ this time of year. OK, whatever, and Happy Hanakkah to you all too.

    If and when the shit hits the fan, Jews will be white. The angry, POC, pitch fork wielding mobs, will not know the difference.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Discard
    We have some similar experiences. The only people I've ever met who share my name, known family aside, are Jews. I wound up on the Democratic Party's computerized Jewish voter list, and what a difference it made in the campaign literature I got. I was red pilled before there was a red pill. It wasn't pretty. I'm not really an anti-Semite, but I am mistrustful.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. @Anon 2
    Steve, a major correction:

    "Polish nobility invited in Rhineland Jews"

    Yes, but the dominant events of that period involved massive
    expulsions of the Jews from Western Europe (with minor
    exceptions like Holland), including the German states.
    To understand the climate of opinion of that era, you could
    read Martin Luther's treatise "On the Jews and their lies" (1543).
    Luther advocates that the Jewish schools and synagogues be set
    on fire, their property confiscated, and any remaining Jews expelled.
    As a result of the expulsions the Jews had nowhere else to go so they,
    like many dissidents of that era, ended up in Poland which was the
    first country of that era to proclaim religious liberty. Many Jewish
    scholars stated that there would be very few Jews left in the world
    today if Poland hadn't given them refuge when they were being
    expelled from Western Europe.

    In a way, the Holocaust could be regarded as a second major (and more
    drastic) attempt by the Western Europeans to expel the Jews from
    Europe.

    Poland which was the first country of that era to proclaim religious liberty

    Poor Poland. Who planted this crazy idea?

    However you are not correct. The religious liberty applied only to Christian religions and to nobles and gentry who opted of Calvinism or Lutheranism. Judaism was orthogonal to Christian squabbles. Jews belonged to entirely different category and no argument concerning religious liberty could be used to protect or harm Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Jews were uniquely well treated there for a long time, which is a major explanation for why there were so many hanging around centuries later, even after the treatment programmatically worsened.
    , @Anon 2
    Wikipedia: "Warsaw Confederation (1573) was the first European
    act granting religious freedoms." It was one of the reasons why the
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was at peace while the Western
    Europeans were butchering each other during the religious wars.

    Edict of Nantes (1598) came much later and as a legal document
    was patterned after the articles of the Warsaw Confederation.

    As one of the commenters pointed out, it's true that, similarly to the
    Jews, Poland developed a mystical sense of its own destiny
    (e.g., as Christ among nations) that, for example, guided Lech Walesa
    and John Paul II in the overthrow of Communism starting with the
    Solidarity movement (1980). Many Poles feel that they are God's
    chosen people in Europe. E.g., read the recent statements by
    Poland's new Prime Minister Morawiecki.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. @Jack D

    I never learned how to really play the game,
     
    And yet you proceed to give us a 5,000 word essay on how Jews are like chess pieces. I am looking forward to AlphaZero's essays on this subject. Maybe AI will be racist but at least it will know what it is talking about.

    I’d say he hit a Home Run, but I never played in the majors so I suppose I’d better just not bother . . .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. @Redman
    And don’t forget the $4billion yearly stipend for Israel. We could end that too and see what happens.

    [snark]
    Can’t do that, Israel is an ally and a precious source of intelligence and military support against those barbarians in Iran who seek to exterminate our ally Israel.
    [/snark]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. @Jack D
    Bangladeshi cab drivers ARE a vital part of the NY economy. Have you ever taken a cab ride to the Upper West Side WITHOUT a Bangladeshi cab driver? I rest my case.

    I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business. I mean you’d think a newcomer would be the last person you would trust to be able to take you to any destination in the city. I realize today with GPS it is not much of a problem. But immigrant cabbies have been dominating big city USA since long before the arrival of personal GPS devices.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel H
    >>I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business..

    Having been a New York City cab driver for five years I can tell you why. The reason is simple, supply and demand. The more taxi cab drivers there are, the less pressure the fleet owners endure to pay fairer wages. That simple. Taxi industry (as do many small businessmen) love unlimited immigration. You know, sometimes, it's the little guy, the small businessman who is the real prick.
    , @Random Lurker
    Because being a taxi driver is stressful, long hours, dangerous, and these days low paid. They dominate because they have few other options and are willing to do it.
    , @Jonathan Mason

    I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business.
     
    You don't have to pass the GED to drive a taxi, you can make more than minimum wage, you have the use of a vehicle for at least part of the day, and plenty of opportunities to take part in lucrative criminal activity linked to drugs and prostitution, should you have the inclination.

    You are also providing a service at inconvenient times like late at night, weekends, holidays when the indigenous population probably prefers not to work or compete with you.
    , @Jack D
    Because it's a lousy job that is not that appealing to natives - long hours for not much pay after expenses, the danger of being robbed, etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    I never learned how to really play the game,
     
    And yet you proceed to give us a 5,000 word essay on how Jews are like chess pieces. I am looking forward to AlphaZero's essays on this subject. Maybe AI will be racist but at least it will know what it is talking about.

    “And yet you proceed to give us a 5,000 word essay on how Jews are like chess”

    It was an analogy.

    Your argument is fallacious. You needn’t have actually fought in the Vietnam War to understand why it didn’t work out.

    And AI is just as likely to be anti-Semitic as it is likely to be racist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. @istevefan
    I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business. I mean you'd think a newcomer would be the last person you would trust to be able to take you to any destination in the city. I realize today with GPS it is not much of a problem. But immigrant cabbies have been dominating big city USA since long before the arrival of personal GPS devices.

    >>I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business..

    Having been a New York City cab driver for five years I can tell you why. The reason is simple, supply and demand. The more taxi cab drivers there are, the less pressure the fleet owners endure to pay fairer wages. That simple. Taxi industry (as do many small businessmen) love unlimited immigration. You know, sometimes, it’s the little guy, the small businessman who is the real prick.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. @George
    Right now the US economy probably does not function without immigrants, and the alt right does not give much of a plan for correcting that. So he is right.

    If you want an example of what I mean look at Ajit Pai's home town of Parsons Kansas. Son of immigrant doctors Pai is able to operate the commanding heights of government, can anyone else, living, from Parsons claim that? And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is.

    And why did Parsons Kansas need South Asian doctors? So you can see what the problem is.

    Actually you know who needs South Asian doctors? South Asian countries do. According to the World Health Organization, the USA has 2.6 physicians per 1000 population, while India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have 0.73, 0.81, and 0.39 respectively.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. @istevefan
    I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business. I mean you'd think a newcomer would be the last person you would trust to be able to take you to any destination in the city. I realize today with GPS it is not much of a problem. But immigrant cabbies have been dominating big city USA since long before the arrival of personal GPS devices.

    Because being a taxi driver is stressful, long hours, dangerous, and these days low paid. They dominate because they have few other options and are willing to do it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor

    The only thing keeping Jews from becoming a fat, waddling(Jews tend to walk funny) target of opportunity are whites whom they hate beyond all measure. Really how long would Jews survive in a place like Niger or Mali? Not very as ethnics don’t really care about Jewish things. Even where whites still dominate the security services as in Europe there are nations where Jews are leavig because of the increasing violence directed towards them by Muslim imports.
     
    I think it helps to see Jews not as hating Whites, but as having a master-slave view. White slaveowners liked happy, dancing, singing blacks who obeyed the rules and stayed on the plantation just fine; Jews like "goodwhites" just fine. It's the uppity badwhites who read and do their own thinking (leads to uprisings) who are the problem. This is precisely because Jews see Whites as their natural hosts, and can't survive without them in places like Niger or Mali. As for the Jews being forced to leave Europe, I suppose they're mostly the conspicuous Jews who can't give up the yarmulkes, sidelocks, black hats, or other Jewish traditions of no concern to the majority of Jews.

    It's also worth pointing out that the White slaveowning class was just fine with more Black "immigration" from Africa; the demographic dangers didn't really rate.

    Right now the US economy probably does not function without immigrants, and the alt right does not give much of a plan for correcting that. So he is right.
     
    "Right now the addict doesn't function without his dope." Yeah there's a plan, it's called detox.

    I’m thinking of Sun Tzu’s dictum that maximum fighting effort comes with your back against the wall and no escape; I guess that is one reason to promulgate a narrative that we are ever precariously balanced on a precipice of genocide, and a holocaust is just one bad thought away from being ignited; constant vigilance and effort are called for, even if it means throwing every immigrant at hand against the alleged foe.
     
    Yes, I've been saying this for years; psychologically, Jews get themselves into a place where they're fighting the next genocide when it comes to racial issues, addressing Jewish power, etc. When you're "fighting for survival" you don't have to observe niceties like morality, honesty, or responsibility. (The slaveowner view is enabled this way; Jews must have Whites as host, it's a matter of survival; Jews have an inborn right to have Whites as their hosts)

    “I think it helps to see Jews not as hating Whites, but as having a master-slave view. White slaveowners liked happy, dancing, singing blacks who obeyed the rules and stayed on the plantation just fine; Jews like “goodwhites” just fine. It’s the uppity badwhites who read and do their own thinking (leads to uprisings) who are the problem.”

    Which is ironic, given that their morality and ethics arose as a ‘slave’ to the European master

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_morality

    They probably developed the inverted world view of the bottom being the top (ie.- the ‘loser’ is superior to the one who achieves) to psychologically cope with being at the bottom during points in their history. Other things suggest this as well. A matrilineal descent for the ‘people ‘ perhaps because for a people who are losing, the women could still be counted on to reproduce whereas a male from a people at the bottom tended to be disfavored.

    Anyway, the foolish worldview has now become their Achilles heel, really. This distorted view of the world leads to all kinds of foolishness, much of which has serious consequences for them, like importing Muslims, supporting blacks who hate them, stirring up resentment against themselves by slapping the face of the majority, etc. Maybe it has been the source of being kicked out of country after country through the ages.

    Some of the tribe see through it and directly ignore it. But many if not most seem tied to it, and feel like they have to try to come up with a million and 1 little ways to justify their way around it (ways which fall flat on their backs with any serious reflection), perhaps much like the million and 1 little ways to get around religious rules. Not allowed to have keys on Sabbath? Well, lets incorporate them into our belt buckle, now they’re just part of our belt buckle and not keys, you see. Not allowed to work equipment on Sabbath? Well, let’s keep a Goyim on the payroll who just happens to want to sit around and do things for us that we need on the Sabbath. We are in favor of illegal immigration, just not for Israel, because, uh, Israel is a little country so can’t have a big heart. Yeah! That’s it. [Never mind that many European countries (like Sweden) being forced against the will of the people to take up Muslim 'refugees' have native populations of a similar size.]

    It’s something we should exploit, because it’s a gaping weakness. It’s why they try to shut down all conversation that disagrees, because at the core of their belief system there is fallacy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @istevefan
    I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business. I mean you'd think a newcomer would be the last person you would trust to be able to take you to any destination in the city. I realize today with GPS it is not much of a problem. But immigrant cabbies have been dominating big city USA since long before the arrival of personal GPS devices.

    I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business.

    You don’t have to pass the GED to drive a taxi, you can make more than minimum wage, you have the use of a vehicle for at least part of the day, and plenty of opportunities to take part in lucrative criminal activity linked to drugs and prostitution, should you have the inclination.

    You are also providing a service at inconvenient times like late at night, weekends, holidays when the indigenous population probably prefers not to work or compete with you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. @istevefan
    I never understood why immigrants dominate the taxi business. I mean you'd think a newcomer would be the last person you would trust to be able to take you to any destination in the city. I realize today with GPS it is not much of a problem. But immigrant cabbies have been dominating big city USA since long before the arrival of personal GPS devices.

    Because it’s a lousy job that is not that appealing to natives – long hours for not much pay after expenses, the danger of being robbed, etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johann Ricke

    Because it’s a lousy job that is not that appealing to natives – long hours for not much pay after expenses, the danger of being robbed, etc.
     
    Etc is a huge factor:

    By the numbers: Taxi driver is the job with the No. 1 murder rate
     
    , @istevefan
    I've never been to London. But from this document it looks like 67 percent of the taxi drivers in London are white British.

    Is Britain different in this way? In the USA immigrants dominate the taxi business.

    While in the middle of this post, I found the answer. Business Insider just did a story on British taxis and the threat Uber poses to them. They brought up the racial angle with Uber threatening the predominately white taxi drivers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. @Jack D

    I never learned how to really play the game,
     
    And yet you proceed to give us a 5,000 word essay on how Jews are like chess pieces. I am looking forward to AlphaZero's essays on this subject. Maybe AI will be racist but at least it will know what it is talking about.

    Most people can’t play sports but they have opinions about it.

    Most people can’t play music but have views on music.

    PS. This guy had an interesting life.

    https://www.chess.com/news/view/viktor-korchnoi-1931-2016-1214

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Verymuchalive
    Paul Kossoff, the lead guitarist, was half-Jewish. The rest were common or garden English, though Fraser undoubtedly had a lot of Scots blood.
    Don't expect much interest from Mr Steve. His interest in music only seems to be stimulated by the LA opera scene, The Clash and the later punk scene - though strangely he seems to have gone off Joe Strummer rather completely.
    He no longer does articles about the Great American or Otherwise Popular Song, usually referenced to a recent Mark Steyn article. Mr Steve used to have a high regard for Mr Steyn, his many talents, especially his apparent ability to retain an MSM slot and salary and hint at un-PC truths.
    This regard seems to have evaporated. When Michelle Malkin and Ann Coutts have bite the bullet and published on VDARE, there was no similar effort from Steyn. He is basically a Neocon MSM hack, as recent contributor Tobias Langdon has exposed.

    Well, yes, however the band was also associated with founding father of British blues Alexis Korner who was half Jewish and who actually gave the band its name Free. I’m not sure what “Free” was supposed to mean in this context, but I guess it was a catchy name for a band and made possible album titles like Free At Last.

    Korner (born Koerner) was an interesting fellow who was a significant career influence on artists like Cream, the Rolling Stones, Jimmy Page, Robert Plant, and Rod Stewart.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    So now you changed the subject from Free to Korner, after your 'Free was a Jew band' fail.

    Do better next time.

    I met all the original Free members, hung out, great group of guys, great rock band.

    , @Anonymous

    Korner (born Koerner) was an interesting fellow who was a significant career influence on artists like Cream, the Rolling Stones, Jimmy Page, Robert Plant, and Rod Stewart.
     
    Yes, but no one is going to think of Cream, the Rolling Stones, the Faces/Small Faces, or Led Zeppelin as Jewish.

    Punk and new wave bands, by contrast, often were Jewish in that key members were Jews. Most people consider that Lou Reed (original family name Rabinowitz) and Iggy Pop (born James Jewell Osterberg) were the founders of punk rock. I think that almost every successful band out of CBGBs (owned by Hillel Krystal) had at least one Jewish member. The Ramones had two, Jeffrey Ross Hyman (Joey Ramone) and Thomas Erdelyi (Tommy Ramone). Patti Smith Group included definitely Jewish Lenny Kaye and Richard Sohl, who I believe was but am unable to verify was Jewish. And of course the most commercially successful "punk" act of all time (especially outside their native United States) was Blondie, with guitarist Chris Stein.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    Aristotle Would Be Accused of "Wrong Think" and Labeled a NAZI Today

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQ-U2NPVwAIOWKd.jpg
    , @27 year old

    The diversity Laffer Curve. How much alienation, atomization and social chaos can we inflict on the goyim, while still maintaining optimum productivity?
     
    The diversity laffer curve is genius.

    Call it the Enoch-Peinovich curve.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. @eah
    https://twitter.com/McDonaldfollow/status/941107965704200192
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. @Jack D

    The Jew messiah can not appear until Christianity is destroyed.

     

    Really? Where is this written?

    Your argument starts out with a totally false premise so everything that follows is equally false. The Messiah can come at any moment - maybe even today.

    He has already arrived. You are just to blind to see. You made a terrible mistake. It is not to late to ask for forgiveness and repent your sins against God.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Olorin
    God would rather hear a human talk about the solutions to the Millennium Prize problems.

    I understand from the Euler's Identity that appeared on my toast this morning that once we get those solved, god has another dozen for us.

    But mathematically we're still at Genesis 1:2 (KJV)--i.e., Navier-Stokes Equation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. @utu
    Poland which was the first country of that era to proclaim religious liberty

    Poor Poland. Who planted this crazy idea?

    However you are not correct. The religious liberty applied only to Christian religions and to nobles and gentry who opted of Calvinism or Lutheranism. Judaism was orthogonal to Christian squabbles. Jews belonged to entirely different category and no argument concerning religious liberty could be used to protect or harm Jews.

    Jews were uniquely well treated there for a long time, which is a major explanation for why there were so many hanging around centuries later, even after the treatment programmatically worsened.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. @Jack D
    Keep in mind that a lot of American doctors educated at foreign medical schools (because US med school too hard to get into) so "doctors can only attend med school in their home country" cuts both ways.

    I don't doubt that there are farm boys in Iowa who have no desire to attend Harvard med school (which doesn't want them either) but almost every state has its own med school as part of its state university system (and law school, etc.) . If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren't that many who do. Either he would rather stay on the family farm or is not smart enough/hard working enough to get thru med school in the 1st place or if he is, after med school he wants to move somewhere that has better restaurants than Podunk and where he can make more $. So the choice of the good people of Podunk, KS is either Arjun as their family doctor or nobody.

    “I don’t doubt that there are farm boys in Iowa who have no desire to attend Harvard med school (which doesn’t want them either) but almost every state has its own med school as part of its state university system (and law school, etc.) . If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren’t that many who do.”

    What rot. Every med school in America is hyper competitive to get into. There’s no free ride for that “bright farm boy” you have the typical Jewish contempt for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas

    What rot. Every med school in America is hyper competitive to get into. There’s no free ride for that “bright farm boy” you have the typical Jewish contempt for.
     
    I've often wondered whether all of the Medical School science prerequisites are really necessary to learn medicine in order to become an effective practitioner, or whether they're just barriers to entry used to keep the pool of potentials artificially small and the compensation of doctors high. I'm neither a doctor nor a scientist so I don't know. My surgeon buddy doesn't seem to think he uses organic chemistry regularly.

    I suppose one of the tests would be whether these requirements are waived or lowered for certain social considerations - i.e., affirmative action for the purpose of racial diversity. If they can be waived for those interests, it's kind of hard to pretend that they have life or death implications in furthering the interest of supplying sufficient medical doctors for a growing population.
    , @SimpleSong
    I know plenty of PAs and NPs who are good enough to be MDs (and are actually significantly better than the affirmative action MDs.) They all have the same profile: white gentiles, working class parents who probably didn't know how to play the game. Probably didn't even know there was a game; naively believed this place is a fair meritocracy.

    Aside from the AA players, the worst MDs I know are young Jews whose parents were also MDs. Technically bad and rude as hell because they've never worked a real job. No way in hell they make it in on a level playing field. The old Jews and the Asians are fairly solid though.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. @Jack D
    Because it's a lousy job that is not that appealing to natives - long hours for not much pay after expenses, the danger of being robbed, etc.

    Because it’s a lousy job that is not that appealing to natives – long hours for not much pay after expenses, the danger of being robbed, etc.

    Etc is a huge factor:

    By the numbers: Taxi driver is the job with the No. 1 murder rate

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. @Jack D
    Because it's a lousy job that is not that appealing to natives - long hours for not much pay after expenses, the danger of being robbed, etc.

    I’ve never been to London. But from this document it looks like 67 percent of the taxi drivers in London are white British.

    Is Britain different in this way? In the USA immigrants dominate the taxi business.

    While in the middle of this post, I found the answer. Business Insider just did a story on British taxis and the threat Uber poses to them. They brought up the racial angle with Uber threatening the predominately white taxi drivers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. It isn’t just Jewish brains that fuel the anti white jihads. It is primarily Jewish control of the media and academia and their disproportionate influence on academia and law. Without Jews’ belief that they are not safe until European culture is destroyed and whites a minority, the SJW would be just viewed as crazed freaks.

    But it is wishful thinking that Jews will change. The reason they have such a strong track record of being driven from societies is that they eventually turn against the host population.

    Why don’t they ever learn? I think it comes down to 2 things:

    1. People tend to use their analytic ability to justify what they emotionally want to do.

    2. A recent study found that smarter, more highly educated people are easier to fool because they had too high of an opinion of their reasoning capabilities. You can see this in the moronic ideas advocated by the elite, none of them is more illustrative of this tendency than believing “ISIS is not Islamic.” You have to be very smart to believe something that stupid.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  158. @eah
    https://twitter.com/McDonaldfollow/status/941107965704200192

    The diversity Laffer Curve. How much alienation, atomization and social chaos can we inflict on the goyim, while still maintaining optimum productivity?

    The diversity laffer curve is genius.

    Call it the Enoch-Peinovich curve.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. @Jack D
    Regarding Moore, he is literally yesterday's news, but I have to admit that the wife was hilariously naive. "Some of my best friends are Jewish" is the oldest cliche in the book. They have found this carved in hieroglyphics on the pyramids. You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America. That being said, I really liked her - she really appeared totally sincere.

    Also you need to watch the video - after she tells the press that her husband's lawyer is Jewish she gives a little nod like "take that, you media!" She then mentions that they are friends with not only Jews but rabbis. That's more than I can say - I have never met a rabbi that I would want to be friends with - I usually find them creepy and sanctimonious. The non-Orthodox ones are all flaming liberals and they are all interested in getting money from you. Well there was kind of a cool rabbi in my synagogue that I might have hung out with if he was my age (but he was much younger). But then they found out he had been sleeping with all the lonely divorcees in the congregation, so he's gone.

    Then she mentioned something about "having fellowship" with her Jewish friends and rabbis. I don't know what having fellowship in Alabama involves, but if it involves 14 year old girls and taking off all of your clothes then I want nothing to do with it.

    Well there was kind of a cool rabbi in my synagogue that I might have hung out with if he was my age (but he was much younger). But then they found out he had been sleeping with all the lonely divorcees in the congregation, so he’s gone.

    LOL Jack.

    At least you can take pride that the clerics for your team are doing unclerical behavior that’s perfectly natural. When the clerics for my team go off the reservation they seem to prefer trying to convince 14 year old boys to perform unnatural acts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. So the best White guys can do is hope Jewish people knock it off.

    Gee, that’s great. What a bright future we have.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  161. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D
    Regarding Moore, he is literally yesterday's news, but I have to admit that the wife was hilariously naive. "Some of my best friends are Jewish" is the oldest cliche in the book. They have found this carved in hieroglyphics on the pyramids. You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America. That being said, I really liked her - she really appeared totally sincere.

    Also you need to watch the video - after she tells the press that her husband's lawyer is Jewish she gives a little nod like "take that, you media!" She then mentions that they are friends with not only Jews but rabbis. That's more than I can say - I have never met a rabbi that I would want to be friends with - I usually find them creepy and sanctimonious. The non-Orthodox ones are all flaming liberals and they are all interested in getting money from you. Well there was kind of a cool rabbi in my synagogue that I might have hung out with if he was my age (but he was much younger). But then they found out he had been sleeping with all the lonely divorcees in the congregation, so he's gone.

    Then she mentioned something about "having fellowship" with her Jewish friends and rabbis. I don't know what having fellowship in Alabama involves, but if it involves 14 year old girls and taking off all of your clothes then I want nothing to do with it.

    > You really have to lack self awareness to say this un-ironically in 2017 America.

    Eh, it’s just an embodiment of the cultural divide between big metropolitan areas on the coasts and (some) lifelong Alabama residents.

    The gulf is real. It’s analogous to a person well versed in the internet/social media vs. someone who has only sparingly used the internet (thinking of me and my 69-year-old aunt). There are so many seemingly fundamental “baby” things that she just doesn’t understand and these things simply cannot be explained/taught because they are so context dependent and interconnected.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. @Rod1963
    No, what they lack is called a survival instinct.

    What's the Jewish strategy in a nutshell? 'Hey lets import millions of Muslims who hate our guts so they can crush the goy, what can go wrong?'

    The only thing keeping Jews from becoming a fat, waddling(Jews tend to walk funny) target of opportunity are whites whom they hate beyond all measure. Really how long would Jews survive in a place like Niger or Mali? Not very as ethnics don't really care about Jewish things. Even where whites still dominate the security services as in Europe there are nations where Jews are leavig because of the increasing violence directed towards them by Muslim imports.

    That said, NYC deserves what it gets in terms of terrorist attacks. 9/11 should have been a wake up call for those snobs but it wasn't. Instead they went back to sticking their heads up their behinds and voted in a Communist mayor who hates the cops and white people. You can't have sympathy for people like that at all.

    A lot of Jews think they did better under Muslim rule like the Ottoman Empire.

    I don’t agree, but I have heard it stated by Jews that Christians (meaning White Christians) were much worse historically than Muslims.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. you be reprlent:

    “A man who was twice removed from his state’s Supreme Court for defying judicial orders, who said Muslims should not be allowed to serve in elective office, who suggested the black family was better off under slavery, and who declared that homosexuality should be illegal — this man will not be in the United States Senate. Thank God.”

    https://nypost.com/2017/12/13/roy-moore-needed-to-lose-but-what-does-it-mean-for-2018/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  164. @Peterike
    “I don’t doubt that there are farm boys in Iowa who have no desire to attend Harvard med school (which doesn’t want them either) but almost every state has its own med school as part of its state university system (and law school, etc.) . If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren’t that many who do.”

    What rot. Every med school in America is hyper competitive to get into. There’s no free ride for that “bright farm boy” you have the typical Jewish contempt for.

    What rot. Every med school in America is hyper competitive to get into. There’s no free ride for that “bright farm boy” you have the typical Jewish contempt for.

    I’ve often wondered whether all of the Medical School science prerequisites are really necessary to learn medicine in order to become an effective practitioner, or whether they’re just barriers to entry used to keep the pool of potentials artificially small and the compensation of doctors high. I’m neither a doctor nor a scientist so I don’t know. My surgeon buddy doesn’t seem to think he uses organic chemistry regularly.

    I suppose one of the tests would be whether these requirements are waived or lowered for certain social considerations – i.e., affirmative action for the purpose of racial diversity. If they can be waived for those interests, it’s kind of hard to pretend that they have life or death implications in furthering the interest of supplying sufficient medical doctors for a growing population.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "I’ve often wondered whether all of the Medical School science prerequisites are really necessary to learn medicine in order to become an effective practitioner, or whether they’re just barriers to entry used to keep the pool of potentials artificially small and the compensation of doctors high. I’m neither a doctor nor a scientist so I don’t know. My surgeon buddy doesn’t seem to think he uses organic chemistry regularly."

    They are completely unnecessary. EVERY medical student I have encountered has said the same; they never use that information in any capacity.

    Another unnecessary requirement is the four year degree. Australia doesn't require it and they do just fine. This is about lowering the applicant pool in order to inflate doctor salaries.

    Average family physician US: $185k/ year.

    Same doc in Germany: $125k/year.

    Another scheme US medical schools use is to unnecessarily jack up tuition and other expenses ($200k/year administrator salaries), and then claim they don't get enough funding to admit more.

    , @Vinteuil
    "I’ve often wondered whether all of the Medical School science prerequisites are really necessary to learn medicine in order to become an effective practitioner, or whether they’re just barriers to entry used to keep the pool of potentials artificially small and the compensation of doctors high."

    Wonder no longer - it's barriers to entry, all the way.

    An MD is just a glorified mechanic - and no more likely to fix what ails you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. @Daniel H
    >>We are all partners in the American project.......

    There is no American "project". There is no American "experiment". Have you ever heard of a Chinese, Mexican, Brazilian, French or Israeli project? Oh, I know, magic dirt.

    There used to be an American nation. Substantially, there still is one but it has been eclipsed by the American imperium. As went all empires, the American empire too will end in the "dust bin of history".

    I keep hearing about this pure American nation that once existed, but people who talk about it keep drawing the line further and further back (but not so far back that THEY are excluded) – “they all have to go back” apparently doesn’t just mean Mexicans and Chinese – to get to a pure American nation you have to get rid of the Ellis Island Jews and Italians and Poles, etc. and then the pre-Civil War Irish and Germans. By the time you are done sending everyone back there will be like 10 people left in America and 5 of them will be black.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas

    I keep hearing about this pure American nation that once existed, but people who talk about it keep drawing the line further and further back (but not so far back that THEY are excluded) – “they all have to go back” apparently doesn’t just mean Mexicans and Chinese – to get to a pure American nation you have to get rid of the Ellis Island Jews and Italians and Poles, etc. and then the pre-Civil War Irish and Germans. By the time you are done sending everyone back there will be like 10 people left in America and 5 of them will be black.
     
    This is an excellent stratagem for convincing the goyim that you don't find them contemptible and aren't seeking to displace them by mass immigration, Yankel.

    "I'm not swindling you out of your inheritance, goy, just explaining how it belongs in equal shares to everybody else on Earth . . . after I take my fees off the top, of course, which is usual and customary."

    People here don't use the term "pure," they use the term "core" to refer to the original settler stock. "Core" connotes the existence of a small outer layer of exotics however insignificant in number.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. @Anon
    I never learned how to really play the game, but chess is a useful metaphor for Jewish Power.

    Not only are there different levels of mastery but different chess pieces have different roles serving various layers of power.

    Not all Jews play the Game of Power at high levels. Some are either dumb, mediocre, or too hotheaded to see the bigger picture. Uncontrolled personality can override and destroy even high IQ people. Norman Mailer nearly destroyed his career by stabbing his wife. Had she died, his career would have suffered a great setback. Roman Polanski ended up in exile because he couldn't control his boing, a rather perverse one at that. Kubrick was smart to remove himself from the temptations. It's like Dylan retreated to some suburb in Woodstock for awhile when things got too crazy.

    In chess, there is the gambit that looks like a bad move but actually sets up for something bigger down the line. So, what seems like Jewish stupidity or short-sightedness could be a gambit. It's like in HOUSE OF GAMES and GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS. The winners can see a little more ahead than the other guy. Even without the good leads, they have mental leads. They can use empathy to emotionally gauge the other characters. And it's not just about a cold dry game but about emotions. How to manipulate emotions. The woman in HOUSE OF GAMES is conned not only by the brilliance of the huckster but his charms and flattery of her own repressed ego.

    Among the chess pieces, the lowest are the pawns. Some Jews are just pawns. The low-level Jews, the antifa bottomfeeder type and SJW dummies. They think stupidly and act dumbly... just like pawns in chess, but they can be effective in short bursts or their madness can serve as blocking tactics. Antifa terror suppresses Free Speech by nationalists, esp as Antifa and SJW get special protection from the Police as seen in Berkeley and Charlottesville. So, pawns are useful to the Power.



    But there are other pieces.

    Neocons are like the knights/horses. They are unpredictable. They are supposed to be 'conservative', but their motions always turn this way or that way. They seem to be moving forward but one can't tell which way they will hook, left or right. Also, Neocons, as 'conservatives' who work(often very well) with Liberal Zionists, jump over the understood boundaries. Neocons jump from left to right to left to right.

    Jewish Media are like bishops. Bishops are mercurial and slip diagonally all across the board. When straight lanes are blocked, bishops can slip in sideways. And media are like that. As its signals go all over the place, it permeates into every household. Con or Lib, any American who turns on the radio or TV or even internet(due to ethno-monopoly control of platforms that work with ADL), come under the power of Jewish bishop power.

    Jewish Power in Deep State and institutions like Academia are like Rooks. Less obvious and mobile than bishop power when the board is cluttered but more solid and substantive. They are the bastions of power that give directives to the media on what can be said and can't be said.

    Jewish oligarchic power is like the Queen. Super-rich Jews can exert tremendous power by donating to colleges, buying up politicians, funding certain kind of activists(in NGO's), and spreading cash all around. Just think of what a sole Adelson or Soros can do. A lot.

    And then, there is the King. The King is chess is the most important piece, but it also the most vulnerable piece without much direct power. But if it goes, all else goes. Even if you got rooks, bishops, knights, and queen, a checkmate is checkmate. It's game over. On that basis, the King is the most important piece even though, in some ways, it is the most ineffective and weakest piece.
    And this goes for Jews. The most important thing for Jews is the Covenant, though it's been secularized in recent times.

    In some ways, what is most valuable to Jews is the idea of the Covenant(with God, History, Destiny, etc). Without it, Jewishness cannot exist. Without it, there would have been no plan to regain the Holy Land. Jews have gained a lot in history and then lost nearly everything.. but they carried on. Why? The Covenant. So, if a billionaire Jew loses every penny but retains the Covenant, he still has Jewishness that can be passed down through the generations. It is priceless. Because the Covenant isn't one individual or institution, it has no practical or applicable power. It's not like the military or money. But it's the thing that gives Jews a sense of center and serves as a compass in their navigation through space and time. It's like no matter how big a ship with how many crew and how many guns, the ships in the Voyage of Discovery would have been lost without the compass or other means to gauge direction.

    The Covenant is a strange and paradoxical thing. It keeps Jews humble but also most arrogant and megalomaniacal. As a pact with God, they must bow down before the Lord. Among secular Jews, the Covenant is with History and/or Justice, like Marx with theory of class and revolution. The covenant is humbling because it says Jews must serve something bigger than themselves, be it God or History or Humanity or Justice or Truth or some such. But it is also arrogant because it gives Jews the sense that they have a special place in history. Jews feel that without them, the world would be missing the axle. Wheels will spin out in all directions. Jews need to hold everything together because they and only they understand and see the Big Picture. This paradox was there in Jesus Himself, who was the most humble Man before God but also the most megalomaniacal Man who ever lived, claiming to be Son of God and God Himself.

    Jews are humbled by the Covenant because it allowed them to survive and carry on even when everything seemed lost. Even when all their fortunes were gone and their cities burned down, they had this special identity and sense of place in the universe.
    But because the Covenant proved their resilience and ability to comeback from the direst setbacks and tragedies(and because it connected them with the Laws of the Universe), it made them feel as the most special people.

    This Covenant cannot be owned by a single Jew, yet it belongs to every Jew as an individual soul. In pagan myths, if a man is favored by gods and made great as a demi-god-like figure, it is a favor bestowed onto him alone. But in the story of Abraham, what was given to Abraham is to be passed down the generations as a fire in the soul. It is the one equalizer between the richest Jew and poorest Jew, happiest Jew living in freedom and unhappiest Jew living in bondage. The Covenant reminds the poorest Jew that he could rise to the top because he is of the special Tribe. It also reminds the richest Jew that his life still has meaning and value because, even if he loses everything, he still has the Covenant that links him with God or History.

    Without the Covenant, Jews could not have risen so powerfully(as a People and Power than as mere individuals) after WWII and Shoah.
    Also, it is the ONLY thing that can last indefinitely. The richest and most powerful Jews today will die in a few decades. Soros and Adelson can't live forever. And there's no telling what their children will do the fortunes. No one lives forever. Radical individualism is dumb hubris. But Covenant is forever. It was around 2000 yrs ago and it can remain 2000 yrs from now if Jews pass it down generation after generation.

    So, to understand the psychological roots of Jewish Power, we need to focus on the King piece, the Covenant. It is almost invisible like the King in chess as it's hardly moved and often hidden via 'castling'. And yet, it is the source of Jewish Power through the ages. Without the Covenant, there can be rich and successful Jewish individuals who exert individual power, much like Bill Gates or Tim Cook does. But individual power is only for a lifetime whereas Covenant Power is for all time. Indeed, notice how even Cook and his ilk serve Jewish Power since it exists as a focus of identity. Cook may serve himself as a successful individual but when it comes to 'something bigger than myself', he defers to Jewish power of ADL because it exists as a Covenant, an Idea, an ageless ethno-proposition.
    Suppose there are 100 Irishmen and 100 Poles. Suppose 100 Irishmen have lost interest in their Irishness and just see themselves as either lone individuals or part of generic humanity. In contrast, suppose Poles cling to their sense of Polishness with pride and prestige. Over time, even the Irish individuals will come to serve and honor Polishness because it retains its force as an identity. It's like if you have two big blocks of magnets and if you keep one magnet whole while breaking the other magnet into tiny little individual pieces, the tiny little pieces will gravitate to the big magnet and stick to it. Why are Anglos in Canada and Irish in Ireland celebrating Black History Month? Why are they into Holocaust Cult Worship? Because having cucked out their own identity as 'white bread' and 'boring', they either see themselves as lone individuals(the Irish 'right') or as generic humanity(the Irish 'left'). Since genericism lacks direction, it is attracted to Other identities that retain its center and meaning. Since blackness is into 'yo, I be badass and kick butt and hump every ho', the cucked out whites are gravitating toward blackness. And some even turn to Islam since it remains a viable and powerful spiritual ideology. Christianity has become so generic that it caves to Homomania among Liberal christos or to Zionism among Conzo christos. "Muh holy homos" or "Muh holy Israel".

    If Jews were to lose or abandon the Covenant, they could still be rich and successful, like many Wasps are. But they would have no power beyond that of individuals. Bill Gates is a very rich man and has power of money and position. But he is not part of any power as a people, culture, or tribe. He may claim to be of the Geek Tribe, but geeks serve technology and don't live forever.

    And this is why Jews are pissed with Putin and Trump. Jews know neither Putin or Trump intends to hold Nazi rallies and send Jews to death camps. They don't even intend to take away Jewish property. Even with Putin's pro-Russian economic policies, many of the super-rich in Russia are Jewish or non-Russian. Some are even Muslim.
    So, why are Jews so upset? Because gentile nationalism is a nascent kind of gentile covenantism. The thing is a people cannot serve two covenants. For a long time, Jews were into serving their own Covenant and just getting along with goyim, thought to be different or even filthy(by some Jews). And in the Middle East, it seems Jews were successful but knew their place and were tolerated and didn't get Too Big. In the Ottoman Empire, Jews were among the successful minority middlemen along with Greeks and Armenians. In such places, Jews sought success but not total control. Muslim World remained under the power of Islam. And Jews in the Middle East were more traditional and remained humble before their own traditions.

    But things were different in the West. I don't know about the virtues of INTERSTELLAR, which I failed to finish watching because I don't think 'corn is good' is a very inspiring idea. But this article gets at something about the West.

    https://altright.com/2017/12/11/is-interstellar-a-movie-about-the-faustian-soul-of-the-white-race/

    The West developed a Faustian soul, and it goes back to Greek mythology and Germanic mythology. It's what Joseph Campbell talks about. It's the soul's equivalent of breaking the Sound Barrier. According to traditional Judaism, there is nothing greater than God, and Jews better watch out.. or else they'll end up like Edward G. Robinson in THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. If Howard Stern, Harvey Weinstein, and Ron Jeremy had given lip to Moses, they would have been wiped out too with the help of Yahweh.
    And Islam means Submission. Allah is great and man is little and he better know his place.
    There is an element of humility in Christianity certainly. But it is also the story of Jesus the Man becoming God. It also about Saul-as-Paul playing the Promethean-Faustian figure and stealing the holy fire of the Jews and passing it off to gentiles and making that New Fire burn brighter and stronger than that of the Jews. Also, a Faustian Pact was made between the most pacifist of religions and most fiercest of all warrior races. Roman Empire collapse physically but survived and gained supremacy over all of Europe spiritually. Barbarians physically overran Rome, but the Roman Church spiritually spread its fire to the darkest and coldest corners of Europe. And Classical Learning, esp after revival during the Renaissance, set the white race onto a Faustian path. Unlike other peoples who accepted certain truths to be timeless, ultimate, and final, the Western Man kept on pushing the boundaries of what is knowable. Unlike other races who felt, "We know enough and the Great Power forbids us from knowing more", the Western Man figured he had to go further and further and voyage and discover the entire world, gain greater knowledge, increase his power to make man closer and closer to gods. Transhumanists want humans to merge with computers and machines and become godly. In a way, even white cucking before Negroes and Jews is a kind of Faustian Pact. Though masked as 'social justice' or 'redress for white guilt', it is about the fascination with Power. A white cuck man who lets a Negro do his woman is obsessed with the Power of the Gro. A white cuck collaborator of globalism is awed by Mighty Brew(hebrew) and want to play a role in it.. even if it means betraying his own race and people. Why not go and be with More Power with the Other race if one's own race now seems rather lame and boring in flyover country? Globalism is a Faustian Pact where Divertocracy combines Diversity and Meritocracy. Bring together the best of all humanity to rule over all the world. So, superior Diversity will tower and rule over inferior Diversity. Exclusive Diversity(open only to talent) shall rule over Inclusive Diversity(open to all the losers of the world).

    Anyway, Jews in the West were also infected with the Faustian Bug. Traditionally, Jewish Covenant meant humility before God. But in the Faustian West, the Jewish Soul sought more and more and more power and knowledge, culminating in atomic explosion and computers. This secularized Faustian Covenant is exciting but also dangerous because it has turned into Jewish self-worship of their own power and prowess. With the fading of ideologies -- seriously, who believes in communism anymore --, there is only the Power.
    David Cronenberg made two interesting films on the fusion of Jewish Way and Western Way. RABID has a blonde Aryan woman who is operated by a Jewish doctor. The fusion leads to an explosive outbreak of epidemic. DANGEROUS METHOD has Jewish Freud and Aryan Jung playing tug-o-war with some neurotic Jewish woman. The movie ends with a caption about WWII and Holocaust. It's as if, just like the fusion of the Jewish and Aryan led to a great tragedy in RABID, the horrors of WWII was, at root, caused by Faustian friction of Aryan and Jews, two people with strong personalities.

    Even though the 'Aryans' led in Faustianism whereas Jews humbly worshiped the almighty God, the funny thing is Jews had more Faustian content hidden within their souls. Paradoxically in a way, Jews were so repressive of Faustianism because they were fearful that, if unloosed, it would go totally out of control. It's like those guarding nuclear bombs have to be more cautious than those guarding conventional weapons. Use conventional weapons in a rash way and you mess up part of a city. Use nukes and the whole city blows up. So, Jewish humility was deceptive. After all, gods are projections of the soul of a people, and the fact that Jews projected onto the universe an all-knowing and all-powerful one and only God means that Jewish personality is inherently power-obsessed. This was so dangerous that Jews had to project the idea onto the universe and worship Him as God. What might happen if Jews with their powerful personalities were to worship themselves as gods? 'Aryan' faustianism was about being great heroes. Jewish faustianism could be about Jewish prophets as gods. In the Middle East, surrounded by religious Muslims, Jews also kept to their humility. But in the Faustian West where 'Aryans' were encouraged to be heroes of discovery and power, this was bound to have much greater impact on Jews. Once unloosed from their restraints, Jewish faustian soul outpaced that of 'Aryans'. Those who seek to be heroes cannot compete with those who seek to be prophets, then gods. It's same with Negroes. Greeks and Western world came up with athletic competition of Olympics. And they hoped to dominate and be heroes/champions. Negroes in Africa were into physical stuff too, but they were forced to be humble because if they chucked their spears in the wrong direction, their asses would be torn apart by lions or stomped by hippos. In Africa, there were reminders that, as tough as the negro be, other creatures could kick their ass. But in the West, white men wiped out all the dangerous animals. So, white man could believe that man could be the physical master by winning in sports. In Africa, the toughest black warrior could act big but then a gorilla or lion might jump out of the bush and remind him what a wussy he be. That kept blacks humble. I mean if a crocodile bites off your leg, you know what real physical power is. But in the West, where physical prowess was decided in the enclosure of the ring or stadium, man could act like he is the toughest hero. When whites competed against the more muscular blacks, blacks didn't just kick the whitey's butt. His pride was no longer checked by gorillas, lions, hippos, and elephants. The frightful reality of wild Africa had kept in check the Faustian spirit of the Negro, but in the West, it realized itself fully. Whites had created a safe human environment where white men could be win in sports and feel like 'champion of the world'. Blacks beat whites and took over this arena, as with Muhammad Ali declaring himself the greatest.
    So, even though White Faustianism led the way, it was usurped in brain power and soul-power by Jews and in physical power and funky power by the Negro.

    Jews are now obsessed with Power. Sure, they do believe to some degree in justice and other stuff, but Jewish Power comes first. Also, power is addictive. People with power want more power. It's like Stalin and Mao kept craving fore more power, purging any perceived rival and enemy and then making fake enemies just to purge them to feel more powerful. But, with Jews, the Power Obsession is more dangerous because, even in secularized form, they have the Covenant. It's like the Kim Klan in North Korea. Mao and Stalin were crazy about power.. for a lifetime. Stalin was not into creating a dynasty. Mao had no plans to turn power to his kids or nephews. So, it was power-obsession of a lifetime. But the Kim Klan created a ridiculous covenant that tied the fate of North Korea with the Kim Klan. So, Kim the elder passed power to Kim to Junior who passed the power to Kim the Retard. If Kim the Elder had been like Stalin, his nation might have changed drastically after his death. But the Power obsession became familial, and this is the basis of much nuttery and paranoia among the Kim Klan. It's not just about fear of North Korea being attacked by outsiders but about the fear of Kim Klan losing the special national covenant.
    Jews are very different from the rulers of North Korea, but they have one thing in common. Jews, like the Kims, have a bigger vision of power. Kims are no longer satisfied with power-for-a-lifetime. They want the power to remain in the Kim Klan forever.
    The big difference between white gentile elites and Jews is that the former thinks in terms of power-for-a-lifetime on individual basis whereas the latter thinks in terms of power-forever-for-our-tribe. So, even though Bill Gates or Warren Buffet love their money and power, they are not interested in the larger Anglo family or identity. It's about themselves as successful individuals. Beyond themselves, they just see 'humanity'. To be sure, they are more sensitive to Jews and blacks because Jews and blacks insist on their strong sense of identity and pride. Unlike Gates and Buffet, Jews are not content to be mere individuals with success over a lifetime. Their sense of Covenant, now Faustianized, wants supreme power to remain in the Jewish Tribe. And this is why they hate Putin and Trump so much. Under Putin-ism and Trumpism, Jews as individuals can make all the money and gain so much influence and etc. But Putinism and Trumpism suggest at(if not blatantly) the possibility of the rise of white gentile national identity. Now, some paranoid Jews may worry about gentile mobs with pitchforks, and the Charlottesville torchlight parade did freak them out. But that is not the main concern. The main concern is that EVEN IF whites don't become anti-Jewish, their own sense of identity will make whites focus on their own interests than on serving Jewish interests. The faustianized Jewish Covenant is addicted to Jewish Supremacism. Because Jews don't have the numbers despite their great wealth and privilege, their supremacism depends on the support of gentiles, especially the whites. Even if whites didn't turn anti-Jewish, let alone 'nazi', but didn't feel like supporting Jewish interests and agenda, Jewish power would diminish overnight. Also, it is this white submissivist near-worship of Jewish Power that forestalls criticism of Jewish Power.
    Indeed, the freakiest silence in the West is lack of honest discussion of Jewish Power. It is surreal because the whole point of a democracy is to loudly voice opposition or criticism to the biggest power. But there is such deafening silence about Jewish Power.

    Because Jews depend on White Submissivist support to maintain Jewish supremacist power, Jews must be especially harsh toward whites. If whites show any sign of identity or group-interest, it must be denounced as 'vile', 'rabid', 'virulent', 'odious', 'toxic', 'divisive', 'ugly', 'white supremacist', 'nazi', etc. Of course, Jews use carrots and sticks. For those whites who are with the Program, they are lauded as 'progressive', 'caring', 'woke', 'compassionate', 'anti-hate', etc. It's like taming animals. If they disobey, punish them hard to show them who is boss. If they obey, pet them and shower them with affection.
    Be very insulting to whites who clamor for identity and be very smiley-faced to whites who cuck out totally and wag their tails.

    There was a time when Jews feared anti-Jewish elements because of threat of violence or endangerment. It was about survival. But now, Jews fear the fading of pro-Jewish sentiments because they are addicted to power. Jewish supremacism is fearful of anti-philosemitism than classic antisemtism. The main worry is that gentiles will be anti-Jewish but more pro-themselves than pro-Jewish.
    It's like a hungry man will eat just to survive. It's about life. But when he has more than he can eat and eats just for pleasure, he gets angry if he isn't served the fanciest cake.
    Power has a similar kind of logic. When Japan faced the West in the 19th century, it had no grand designs. It was only worried about power. It was fearful of the West and desperately hoped to catch up just enough to be able to defend Japan and survive. But then, Japan toyed with the imperial game and lo and behold, even 'defeated' Russia and gained foothold over Northeast Asia. And then, they got addicted to becoming the dominant Asian power FOREVER and that meant preventing the rise of a unified modern China. So, the logic of power went from survival and defense to domination and supremacism. Japanese became so addicted to dominationism that they even risked a major war to cling to their ambition. The idea of retreating from China and just being a normal nation was no longer acceptable to the Japanese. So, a people had worried about survivalism became addicted to supremacism, and then, ONLY supremacism was acceptable and anything less was intolerable.

    As the US rules the world and as Jews rule the US, Jews rule the world. It is a dizzying kind of power. It is Faustian Covenant on steroids, and Jews now want it forever. Because Jews don't see themselves as mere individuals or part of a generic humanity, their main identity is as Jews, and so, their sense of power remains tribal and supremacist. Jewish individuals are no longer satisfied with success as lone members of society. They want this power to remain with the Tribe to the end of time.

    Also, even though non-whites in the West may compete with Jews, they also come under the influence of Jews. This is esp true of East Asians who are such slavish servile dogs under PC. All those Asians in Ivy League schools become servitors of the Empire, just like all those non-whites who studied in Western colleges in the Age of Empire were turned into dutiful servitors of the empire. They were about the Queen than their own people.
    One problem back then was that white race-ism was a thing. So, even as non-whites were welcomed to study in Paris and London, they were so many reminders that they were not quite as good as White Folks.

    But now, non-whites who come to the West feel different because they are welcomed with open arms by Jews who really run the show. (At least officially with open arms since there is the issue of affirmative action that hurts Asians.) If non-whites who went to London or Paris in the past felt slighted and even disregarded by whites, they now feel they have the advantage over whites. After all, PC associates whites with 'guilt' and many other bad stuff. Also, they can't help noticing that whites in white nations are now subjects under Jewish power. So, if non-whites side with Jews, they can rule over whites. Just look at the smug smirk on Fareed Zikavirus' face. Or that lowlife Metha Suckasstu. Or guess who the editors of Harvard Crimson are:

    http://www.thecrimson.com/about/masthead/

    Servitors of the Jewish Empire. So, even as they may resent Jewish power, they know that it is Jewish Power over whites that has given them entry into the halls of power and privilege. They may serve under Jews but will serve OVER whites in white nations.

    Obama knew this well to as the editor of the Harvard Law Review. He had to serve under Jews but it meant serving over whites. Over-underclass.

    Anyway, what Jews fear most is White Identity. It's no longer about Shoah. Jews are not fearful of survival. I mean even the most anti-Putin Jews admit Jews have it pretty good in Russia. The real problem is Jews are no longer fixated on survival but on supreme power. They are like Japan in the 1930s when its military was no longer about survival(from Western Imperialism) but about ensuring permanent Japanese domination over Asia.

    This is why Jews fear Alt Right more than anything. Alt Right is about White Identity. And that can lead to White Covenantism, their own sense of special destiny with History. And if whites serve their own identity, they will disregard that of Jews, and then Jewish supremacism will crumble. Jews will still succeed as individuals, but white nations will no longer have "Muh Israel" and "We Worship Jews" as their main themes.

    When a slave wants out of slavery, the master isn't afraid of his survival. Rather, he fears the loss of his supremacist status to which he'd grown accustomed and addicted to.
    White Emancipation means end of white submissivism to Jewish supremacism. And White Covenantism, if such is possible, means a new kind of covenant that may surpass the power of Jewish Covenant since there are many more whites.

    Poland and Hungary are minor powers, so why are Jews so angry with them? Their nationalism is a kind of covenantism. Poles and Hungarians are saying their nations belong to them as holy lands, just like Israel is to Jews. This sounds fair and square. Jews and their nationalism, Hungarians and their nationalism. So, what is the problem?
    Jews are not satisfied with their own nation and own power. They are addicted to non-Jews serving Jews to maintain Jewish supremacism. And to ensure this, gentiles must forgo their sense of blood and soil to serve and honor the blood and soil of Jews as the one and only true nationalism.

    Every people need a Covenant with history. Look how this powerful idea enabled Jews to survive all kinds of storms through the worst of times. Covenantism will decide the history of mankind. Those who forge it will survive. Those who don't will wash away into generic humanity or end up serving identities that retain powerful identities, like the Irish that now cuck to Jews and Negroes(and even Homos who redefined 'pride' to mean homo.)

    Great essay, Priss Factor.

    Alt Right is about White Identity. And that can lead to White Covenantism, their own sense of special destiny with History …

    Covenantism will decide the history of mankind. Those who forge it will survive.

    Covenant — CALL THE SHIPS TO PORT — Northern Light

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. @Jack D
    I keep hearing about this pure American nation that once existed, but people who talk about it keep drawing the line further and further back (but not so far back that THEY are excluded) - "they all have to go back" apparently doesn't just mean Mexicans and Chinese - to get to a pure American nation you have to get rid of the Ellis Island Jews and Italians and Poles, etc. and then the pre-Civil War Irish and Germans. By the time you are done sending everyone back there will be like 10 people left in America and 5 of them will be black.

    I keep hearing about this pure American nation that once existed, but people who talk about it keep drawing the line further and further back (but not so far back that THEY are excluded) – “they all have to go back” apparently doesn’t just mean Mexicans and Chinese – to get to a pure American nation you have to get rid of the Ellis Island Jews and Italians and Poles, etc. and then the pre-Civil War Irish and Germans. By the time you are done sending everyone back there will be like 10 people left in America and 5 of them will be black.

    This is an excellent stratagem for convincing the goyim that you don’t find them contemptible and aren’t seeking to displace them by mass immigration, Yankel.

    “I’m not swindling you out of your inheritance, goy, just explaining how it belongs in equal shares to everybody else on Earth . . . after I take my fees off the top, of course, which is usual and customary.”

    People here don’t use the term “pure,” they use the term “core” to refer to the original settler stock. “Core” connotes the existence of a small outer layer of exotics however insignificant in number.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Indeed; moreover I daresay the exclusion of just one tiny tribe of primitive, conniving, hatemongering, religious fanatics could render the rest of our nation's problems quite soluble.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Which is ironic, given that their morality and ethics arose as a ‘slave’ to the European master

    Yeah I don’t suppose Jews have a conscious master-slave view of whites (allowing for exceptions, of course); this gets passed through the Jewish cultural filter like everything else, so Jews can behave like a master caste, but muh shoah muh victims muh survival, so presto it’s not a master-slave view, it’s a dominate to survive view (and even acknowledging it as a dominate to survive view would be relatively perspicacious; Jews’ ability to self-review in an ethnic sense is pretty much nil).

    Why don’t they ever learn? I think it comes down to 2 things:

    1. People tend to use their analytic ability to justify what they emotionally want to do.

    2. A recent study found that smarter, more highly educated people are easier to fool because they had too high of an opinion of their reasoning capabilities. You can see this in the moronic ideas advocated by the elite, none of them is more illustrative of this tendency than believing “ISIS is not Islamic.” You have to be very smart to believe something that stupid.

    Ethnocentrism. Ethnocentrism is easily the Jews’ salient trait, the most interesting thing about them. It preceded their high mean IQ; it’s probably the root cause of same (insularity, eugenics, etc.). It’s probably responsible for their psychological intensity; it is at least the concomitant.

    A lot of Jews think they did better under Muslim rule like the Ottoman Empire.

    I don’t agree, but I have heard it stated by Jews that Christians (meaning White Christians) were much worse historically than Muslims.

    Jews say stuff like this because they’re rather sociopathic in the aggregate, where culture is formed. It’s a psych game – negging your mark. Jews follow Christians around because we’re their marks.

    I keep hearing about this pure American nation that once existed, but people who talk about it keep drawing the line further and further back (but not so far back that THEY are excluded) – “they all have to go back” apparently doesn’t just mean Mexicans and Chinese – to get to a pure American nation you have to get rid of the Ellis Island Jews and Italians and Poles, etc. and then the pre-Civil War Irish and Germans. By the time you are done sending everyone back there will be like 10 people left in America and 5 of them will be black.

    Well we’ve got Israel as a guide so we know we’ll be okay.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  169. @Dmitry
    As a rule, in the United States (and other countries), being liberal is positively correlated with education and IQ, which does not say much for the role of education in improving politics. Non-Russian speaking Jews in the United States are the demographic which has been most programmed by over-education. (Although Jews outside the US, usually favor centrist politics for particular reasons - Muslim immigration in Europe; conflict with Muslims in Israel).

    Taxi drivers usually have more sensible politics than college professors. Countries with the most educated and high IQ populations (look at Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands), generally have the most liberal politics.

    There are exceptions like Israel or Japan - where this is a result of war (in the former case), or very high levels of nationalistic programming (in the former and latter case).

    Switzerland is another special case of a conservative, yet educated, population (although 1/4 of people in Switzerland are foreigners).

    “ where this is a result of war (in the former case), or very high levels of nationalistic programming”

    Or that neither country put themselves in a position of accommodating any significant population of minorities who, as with the US, have access to the means of distributing political theater on a mass scale and as a consequence can engage in nonstop hysteria campaigns that give the impression of requiring a response. Remove mass media and the ‘problem’ disappears.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. @Rod1963
    No, what they lack is called a survival instinct.

    What's the Jewish strategy in a nutshell? 'Hey lets import millions of Muslims who hate our guts so they can crush the goy, what can go wrong?'

    The only thing keeping Jews from becoming a fat, waddling(Jews tend to walk funny) target of opportunity are whites whom they hate beyond all measure. Really how long would Jews survive in a place like Niger or Mali? Not very as ethnics don't really care about Jewish things. Even where whites still dominate the security services as in Europe there are nations where Jews are leavig because of the increasing violence directed towards them by Muslim imports.

    That said, NYC deserves what it gets in terms of terrorist attacks. 9/11 should have been a wake up call for those snobs but it wasn't. Instead they went back to sticking their heads up their behinds and voted in a Communist mayor who hates the cops and white people. You can't have sympathy for people like that at all.

    I think their main issue with the gentiles is they seem them as their only real competition. No other group is likely to knock them from their perch. Obviously blacks and browns are not competing for the same economic niche. Asians are to some extent but for whatever reason they are not seen as a threat (not sure if this is right or wrong), but whites (particularly Northern Europeans) are seen as a threat. Hence the demonization of Mormons, preppy Whites (Haven Monahan!), and rural Whites in the media; although since these are three very different groups they get attacked in different ways.

    Not a terribly smart strategy though; since whites tend to be much less antisemitic than blacks, Muslims, Mexicans, etc. And they provide the boots on the ground that make all this accumulation of capital possible, by maintaining order in ways large and small. So maybe it would be best not to undermine them. Just a thought.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. @utu
    Poland which was the first country of that era to proclaim religious liberty

    Poor Poland. Who planted this crazy idea?

    However you are not correct. The religious liberty applied only to Christian religions and to nobles and gentry who opted of Calvinism or Lutheranism. Judaism was orthogonal to Christian squabbles. Jews belonged to entirely different category and no argument concerning religious liberty could be used to protect or harm Jews.

    Wikipedia: “Warsaw Confederation (1573) was the first European
    act granting religious freedoms.” It was one of the reasons why the
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was at peace while the Western
    Europeans were butchering each other during the religious wars.

    Edict of Nantes (1598) came much later and as a legal document
    was patterned after the articles of the Warsaw Confederation.

    As one of the commenters pointed out, it’s true that, similarly to the
    Jews, Poland developed a mystical sense of its own destiny
    (e.g., as Christ among nations) that, for example, guided Lech Walesa
    and John Paul II in the overthrow of Communism starting with the
    Solidarity movement (1980). Many Poles feel that they are God’s
    chosen people in Europe. E.g., read the recent statements by
    Poland’s new Prime Minister Morawiecki.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    I do not think that Warsaw Confederation (1573) or Edict of Nantes (1598) concerned themselves with Jews or Judaism. Jews constituted a separate caste that had special privileges and the laws of the land did not apply specifically to Jews as Jews were often exempt (sometimes to their benefit) from the laws of the land in Poland.

    As far as the "Many Poles feel that they are God’s chosen people in Europe." nonsense, I think it has developed in late 18 and then 19 century. Somebody in Poland should look into whether the mass Fankist (Jakob Frank) conversion to Catholicism that resulted of granting gentry status to tens of thousands of Jews had anything to do with bringing the Jewish Messianic ideas into Polish culture. These ideas are responsible for many nearly suicidal acts by Poles in 19 and 20 century.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. If the Alt-Right’s, by the way of Kevin Macdonald, theory about Jewish self interest is correct then these positions make little sense. As Paul Gottfried has pointed out it is more due to a weird and irrational animus directed against Europeans that took hold in the 60′s. Therefore Europeans are always the great danger.

    By contrast in other countries not quite as shaped by the Frankfurt school you don’t quite see the same schmalz on immigration.

    You don’t see quite as many Jews, either, or quite as clueless a population of Whites, for that matter. Maybe if either was less true, we’d see less subversive influence.

    I don’t think the love-hate superiority-inferiority thing Jews have for Whites is as a fad. Euro populations are their natural host, and have been for like 1500 years. They’re going to continue to psychologically game us as long as they can.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  173. @Jack D

    It’s not a tremendous leap from this to Jewish social/political hobbyhorses (immigration/diversity/objections to public Christianity/contempt for Christian morality) to the idea that the support for mass immigration and non-assimilation is an expression of that hostility and a long-term project to diminish the cultural dominance of the host.
     
    First of all, I don't think that "contempt for Christian morality" is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as "contempt".

    2nd, I think it IS a leap. In the mind of most Jewish liberals one has nothing to do with the other. They don't think of the US as a zero sum game so that giving opportunity to minorities and immigrants TAKES opportunity way from whites. This is the whole (false) premise behind "affirmative action" - you are just giving some oppressed people who remind me of my oppressed ancestors a helping hand, you are not trying to hurt anyone and in fact you are not hurting anyone because of all of the wonderful benefits that immigrants and diversity will bring to us. This POV may be dead wrong, but it is not meant maliciously. They really do think this way.

    3rd, there is no "long-term [Jewish] project to diminish the cultural dominance of the "host". Going back to George Washington's letter to the Newport Jewish congregation, the founding principle of America is that there is NO "host". America is not the goyim's world and Jews are just living in it. We are all partners in the American project and you have no special claim on it.

    If you want to make unfounded leaps in your own bigoted mind, then go ahead, but don't impose imaginary viewpoints on the Jews. If what you are saying is real, show me the minutes of the Elders of Zion where this "project" is discussed or it didn't happen.

    What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else.

    Opposing abortion has nothing to do with Christian morality. I’m an atheist and I’m against abortion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. “Superiority-inferiority thing” should be “superiority-inferiority complex.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  175. First of all, I don’t think that “contempt for Christian morality” is an actual Jewish hobbyhorse. What many Jews do oppose is the imposition of Christian morality (e.g. banning abortion) on everyone else. This is not the same thing as “contempt”.

    No the animus Jews have for Christianity is pretty obvious. It’s not as big a deal as some would make of it, but it’s pretty obvious.

    The rest of that comment was complete scheisse, by the way. Not worth addressing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  176. @Svigor

    The only thing keeping Jews from becoming a fat, waddling(Jews tend to walk funny) target of opportunity are whites whom they hate beyond all measure. Really how long would Jews survive in a place like Niger or Mali? Not very as ethnics don’t really care about Jewish things. Even where whites still dominate the security services as in Europe there are nations where Jews are leavig because of the increasing violence directed towards them by Muslim imports.
     
    I think it helps to see Jews not as hating Whites, but as having a master-slave view. White slaveowners liked happy, dancing, singing blacks who obeyed the rules and stayed on the plantation just fine; Jews like "goodwhites" just fine. It's the uppity badwhites who read and do their own thinking (leads to uprisings) who are the problem. This is precisely because Jews see Whites as their natural hosts, and can't survive without them in places like Niger or Mali. As for the Jews being forced to leave Europe, I suppose they're mostly the conspicuous Jews who can't give up the yarmulkes, sidelocks, black hats, or other Jewish traditions of no concern to the majority of Jews.

    It's also worth pointing out that the White slaveowning class was just fine with more Black "immigration" from Africa; the demographic dangers didn't really rate.

    Right now the US economy probably does not function without immigrants, and the alt right does not give much of a plan for correcting that. So he is right.
     
    "Right now the addict doesn't function without his dope." Yeah there's a plan, it's called detox.

    I’m thinking of Sun Tzu’s dictum that maximum fighting effort comes with your back against the wall and no escape; I guess that is one reason to promulgate a narrative that we are ever precariously balanced on a precipice of genocide, and a holocaust is just one bad thought away from being ignited; constant vigilance and effort are called for, even if it means throwing every immigrant at hand against the alleged foe.
     
    Yes, I've been saying this for years; psychologically, Jews get themselves into a place where they're fighting the next genocide when it comes to racial issues, addressing Jewish power, etc. When you're "fighting for survival" you don't have to observe niceties like morality, honesty, or responsibility. (The slaveowner view is enabled this way; Jews must have Whites as host, it's a matter of survival; Jews have an inborn right to have Whites as their hosts)

    “…Jews get themselves into a place where they’re fighting the next genocide when it comes to racial issues, addressing Jewish power, etc. When you’re “fighting for survival” you don’t have to observe niceties like morality, honesty, or responsibility.”

    And almost as if on cue Jack D tells us in the very next comment:

    “Without Jewish brains and money, the jihadis might decide that their proper target is Jews and not whites in general. Would you prefer to be driving the bus or UNDER the bus? So far this is working, so who are you to say that this is not the right strategy?”

    Q.E.D.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. Jack D, the boilerplate Jewish lectures on The American Way don’t persuade, because Israel. You guys don’t believe your own lectures.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I wonder if Mr. D believes that all Palestinian-Israelis should be given the vote (two state solution is no longer possible). After all, Israel has never been "pure." In fact, it hasn't even been majority Jewish for most of modern history.
    , @utu
    You guys don’t believe your own lectures.

    Who says that Jewish lecturers should believe their own lectures? Jews haven't adopted Kant's moral imperatives. They do not operate this way.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    “If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren’t that many who do.”

    I’m not sure I agree. US medical schools admit fewer than they could, likely to keep doctor salaries outrageously high (probably a majority of applicants could at least be good general practitioners); thus, immigration of foreign doctors who went through less rigorous foreign medical schools: high salaries and tuition money for thee while keeping the natives in Kansas served (going to Kansas is part of the bargain for many foreign docs) even if barely so.

    A poor white boy from Kansas faces serious obstacles if he wants to go to medical school anywhere (moreso in Southern states): outrageously expensive test prep that is basically mandatory if he wants to be admitted, lots of connections to get the right recs, money to apply, good parents who can help him get cool service experiences for the application, a four year degree, be physically attractive and tall (that definitely makes a difference in the interviews), affirmative action for minorities and discrimination for him, etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  179. @Anon
    The whole of the European liberal elite is already doing this. Have you never watched the BBC, or picked up a French or Spanish newspaper?

    But and it's a very big but, when push comes to shove, they are right behind the US in supporting Israel and condemning Iran and Russia.

    Action speaks louder than words.

    It's like Saudis. Always bitching about justice for Palestinians, but always working with Israel under the table.

    But and it’s a very big but, when push comes to shove, they are right behind the US in supporting Israel and condemning Iran and Russia.

    To be fair that might be plain old-fashioned cowardice. When push comes to shove the European elites do what Washington tells them to do whether they like it or not. Just because a slave obeys his master’s orders doesn’t mean he agrees with them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. @AnotherDad
    Don't know. None of this seems very rational. It seems very visceral. Trump, while obviously Jew friendly, has offered up a bit--very mild and wishy washy--of nationalism and this just sends a fair number of Jews into a tizzy. A nation belonging to its citizens!?! 'effing Nazi!

    As i noted in a previous thread, while Jews are quite sharp and commercially savy, their social/political theorizing and ideological committments seem to come without much in the way of--or any desire to do--an empirical check. And Jewish attitudes around nationalism and especially immigration seems to be very visceral and utterly without any empirical grounding whatsoever.

    I don't see Jews worried about quotas, i just see them super-annoyed that anyone is pandering to those flyover country hicks and questioning their narrative of minority/diversity/immigrant wonderfulness.

    As I noted in a previous thread, while Jews are quite sharp and commercially savvy, their social/political theorizing and ideological commitments seem to come without much in the way of–or any desire to do–an empirical check. And Jewish attitudes around nationalism and especially immigration seems to be very visceral and utterly without any empirical grounding whatsoever.

    Agree.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. @eah
    They are vital part of our economy & society.

    I would like it clarified: exactly when did "Muslims" become a "vital part of our economy & society" -- I must have missed that -- also just how "vital" are they? -- say on a scale of 1 - 10.

    just how “vital” are they? — say on a scale of 1 – 10.

    Hmm, -1, at best.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. A group of filthy rich pure blood descendants of Boston Brahmins will hate and despise Middle American whites (Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox; all ethnicities) as widely and deeply as do any group of Jews.

    People like saying this, but I don’t see it. The fact doesn’t seem to be in evidence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Doesn't seem to be 'in evidence' because you're looking for it in the 'real world'. On teevee and the moovies it's in evidence everywhere.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Alec Leamas

    What rot. Every med school in America is hyper competitive to get into. There’s no free ride for that “bright farm boy” you have the typical Jewish contempt for.
     
    I've often wondered whether all of the Medical School science prerequisites are really necessary to learn medicine in order to become an effective practitioner, or whether they're just barriers to entry used to keep the pool of potentials artificially small and the compensation of doctors high. I'm neither a doctor nor a scientist so I don't know. My surgeon buddy doesn't seem to think he uses organic chemistry regularly.

    I suppose one of the tests would be whether these requirements are waived or lowered for certain social considerations - i.e., affirmative action for the purpose of racial diversity. If they can be waived for those interests, it's kind of hard to pretend that they have life or death implications in furthering the interest of supplying sufficient medical doctors for a growing population.

    “I’ve often wondered whether all of the Medical School science prerequisites are really necessary to learn medicine in order to become an effective practitioner, or whether they’re just barriers to entry used to keep the pool of potentials artificially small and the compensation of doctors high. I’m neither a doctor nor a scientist so I don’t know. My surgeon buddy doesn’t seem to think he uses organic chemistry regularly.”

    They are completely unnecessary. EVERY medical student I have encountered has said the same; they never use that information in any capacity.

    Another unnecessary requirement is the four year degree. Australia doesn’t require it and they do just fine. This is about lowering the applicant pool in order to inflate doctor salaries.

    Average family physician US: $185k/ year.

    Same doc in Germany: $125k/year.

    Another scheme US medical schools use is to unnecessarily jack up tuition and other expenses ($200k/year administrator salaries), and then claim they don’t get enough funding to admit more.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    “I’ve often wondered whether all of the Medical School science prerequisites are really necessary to learn medicine in order to become an effective practitioner, or whether they’re just barriers to entry used to keep the pool of potentials artificially small and the compensation of doctors high. I’m neither a doctor nor a scientist so I don’t know. My surgeon buddy doesn’t seem to think he uses organic chemistry regularly.”
     
    I recently had a couple of small annoying growths removed from my forearm. I had to go to a dermatologist and my insurance paid almost three thousand dollars for this rocket surgery.

    This dermatologist, a woman, was #3 in her class of something like 230. She had to go to four years of STEM college undergrad and then four years of med school including rotations in internal medicine, hematology, oncology, and OB/GYN in residency, to do a job that can't possibly make use of most of this.

    It's like making a prospective car mechanic learn to work on bulldozers, tractor trailers, small engines and helicopters to be allowed to put brakes on your Subaru. If they did that a brake job would cost as much as my recent surgery.

    It's also interesting why such a high graduating student would go to dermatology. Is it because dermatology is more demanding than open heart surgery or nuclear medicine? No, it's because there a very small number of dermatologist residencies and the highest ranking grads get first choice of what they want. And as she explained, she has four kids and dermatology is a good fit with being a working mother. She keeps banker hours and will never be on 24-hour call. That's why dermatology residencies are highly sought after.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. @Peterike
    “I don’t doubt that there are farm boys in Iowa who have no desire to attend Harvard med school (which doesn’t want them either) but almost every state has its own med school as part of its state university system (and law school, etc.) . If some bright farm boy had a dream of opening a practice in Podunk, Kansas, he could make it come true but there aren’t that many who do.”

    What rot. Every med school in America is hyper competitive to get into. There’s no free ride for that “bright farm boy” you have the typical Jewish contempt for.

    I know plenty of PAs and NPs who are good enough to be MDs (and are actually significantly better than the affirmative action MDs.) They all have the same profile: white gentiles, working class parents who probably didn’t know how to play the game. Probably didn’t even know there was a game; naively believed this place is a fair meritocracy.

    Aside from the AA players, the worst MDs I know are young Jews whose parents were also MDs. Technically bad and rude as hell because they’ve never worked a real job. No way in hell they make it in on a level playing field. The old Jews and the Asians are fairly solid though.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "the worst MDs I know are young Jews whose parents were also MDs."

    Oh, and that's ANOTHER scam these schools use to reduce the applicant pool: legacy candidates are given significant advantage.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. @Svigor
    Jack D, the boilerplate Jewish lectures on The American Way don't persuade, because Israel. You guys don't believe your own lectures.

    I wonder if Mr. D believes that all Palestinian-Israelis should be given the vote (two state solution is no longer possible). After all, Israel has never been “pure.” In fact, it hasn’t even been majority Jewish for most of modern history.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @SimpleSong
    I know plenty of PAs and NPs who are good enough to be MDs (and are actually significantly better than the affirmative action MDs.) They all have the same profile: white gentiles, working class parents who probably didn't know how to play the game. Probably didn't even know there was a game; naively believed this place is a fair meritocracy.

    Aside from the AA players, the worst MDs I know are young Jews whose parents were also MDs. Technically bad and rude as hell because they've never worked a real job. No way in hell they make it in on a level playing field. The old Jews and the Asians are fairly solid though.

    “the worst MDs I know are young Jews whose parents were also MDs.”

    Oh, and that’s ANOTHER scam these schools use to reduce the applicant pool: legacy candidates are given significant advantage.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. @Jack D
    About 1/3 of American Presidents never served in the military, including some greats and not so greats from both parties:

    John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Quincy Adams, Martin Van Buren, Millard Fillmore, Grover Cleveland, William Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Donald Trump.

    The other 2/3 with military backgrounds included some real turkeys (Jimmy Carter). The 2 great world wars of the 20th century followed by the Cold War put a lot of men in uniform who would not have in other times.

    And just because they wore a uniform did not mean that they really fought. LBJ was already a Congressman when he went in during WWII. He was awarded a totally unmerited Silver Star by General MacArthur as a political gesture. Here is his citation:


    For gallantry in action in the vicinity of Port Moresby and Salamaua, New Guinea, on June 9, 1942. While on a mission of obtaining information in the Southwest Pacific area, Lieutenant Commander Johnson, in order to obtain personal knowledge of combat conditions, volunteered as an observer on a hazardous aerial combat mission over hostile positions in New Guinea. As our planes neared the target area they were intercepted by eight hostile fighters. When, at this time, the plane in which Lieutenant Commander Johnson was an observer, developed mechanical trouble and was forced to turn back alone, presenting a favorable target to the enemy fighters, he evidenced marked coolness in spite of the hazards involved. His gallant actions enabled him to obtain and return with valuable information.
     
    Reading between the lines, he got a Silver Star for taking an airplane ride and not crying for his mama.

    The end of the Cold War and the draft saw a massive shrink in our military so it's less likely that future Presidents will have served.

    So you really can't read too much into that one factor.

    [Lyndon Johnson] got a Silver Star for taking an airplane ride and not crying for his mama.

    I think LBJ’s volunteering for this mission showed courage—June 9, 1942, 11 B-26s, six B-17s and five B-25s escorted by eight P-39s attack in daylight the heavily-defended Japanese base at Lae. That was not some milk run by any means.
    Johnson was assigned to fly as observer in 1440-86, but there was some confusion getting the VIP passengers squared away and Lt. Col. Francis Stevens, who was escorting Johnson on his tour of the combat area, got aboard -86 and Johnson got into another plane, 1440-88.
    Because of this delay, the B-26s were late getting airborne and lagged behind the rest of the formation, losing the protection of the fighter escort and the defensive firepower of the other bombers’ guns.
    On take-off, -88 suffered a generator failure. The plane stayed with the formation for a half-hour before the pilot aborted and returned to base. Johnson’s diary for the day records merely, “After we were off the field with [PIC] Greer, generator went out: crew begged him to go on. For the next 30 minutes we flew on one generator.”
    The early model B-26 had a marginal 12 volt electrical system. Loss of a generator put a strain on the remaining one, which was needed to control the electric props and the electric gun turret. It was SOP to abort with a generator failure because if the remaining generator failed, the aircraft would be lost.
    On nearing the target, the American force was intercepted by 24 Zeros. The B-26 Johnson had been assigned to, 40-1486, was shot down, all aboard being killed. Another B-26, 40-1363 was shot up so badly it crashed while attempting to land on the return. Four other B-26s suffered battle damage.
    While it suffered no damage on this mission, -88 was shot down on a later mission and both the pilot and co-pilot were killed.
    Normally, an observer on a combat mission would have been awarded an Air Medal. Brigadier General William Marquat, who flew on the mission in 40-1496, recommended Johnson for the Silver Star and Major General Richard Sutherland, MacArthur’s chief of staff, approved it.
    The pretext for giving LBJ the Silver Star is in a letter to him from Marquat: “Your outstanding bravery in volunteering for a so-called ‘suicide mission’ in order to get a first-hand view of what our Army fliers go through has been subject of much favorable comment since your departure. It is indeed a great government we have when members of Congress take THOSE [sic] chances in order to better serve their fellow men in the legislative bodies. You surely earned your decoration.”
    Doubtless, the award was made for reasons other than honoring Johnson’s bravery, however. Consider the timing: the Battle of Midway had just ended when the mission was flown and the Battle of the Coral Sea was only a month old. The Navy was getting all the credit for fighting the Japanese, Lieutenant Commander Butch O’Hare was a household name, and the army in the southwest Pacific was being ignored. The Japanese had not yet been defeated in New Guinea and were still driving toward Port Moresby. They held control of the air and were bombing Australia.
    Journalists as well as visiting politicians were also given VIP treatment in hopes of generating publicity, and frequently flew on dangerous missions and wrote some very compelling accounts of what they witnessed.
    Hobart Skidmore, a then-famous reporter who had covered the labor unrest in the West Virginia coal mines, wrote a series of gripping articles about the New Guinea air war in those early days, describing, for example, Japanese fighters bursting through clouds to intercept American bombers, “climbing as if they had been fired from gigantic guns.”
    A Life photographer wrote about his harrowing experiences when the B-26 he was flying in was torn apart by a monstrous thunderstorm. He made the mistake of opening his parachute while still in the storm and stayed aloft for over two hours and was taken so high he lost consciousness and suffered frost bite. Once he got on the ground it took him a month struggling through the jungle to get back to friendly territory. He was feted by MacArthur and given a VIP flight home.
    As far as Johnson is concerned, he didn’t need to volunteer to fly a combat mission, only luck prevented him from being killed on that mission, and he did not solicit a medal.
    MacArthur’s staff was merely trying to direct attention to their efforts and so, hopefully, get more supplies and reinforcements — when Johnson flew his mission, the 22nd Bomb Group he flew with was so short of personnel that aircrew serviced and armed their own planes.
    At the time of Johnson’s flight, the entire fighter strength of the Army Air Force in New Guinea was two P-39 squadrons, only based at Moresby for about 2 months, during which time they had lost 36 planes, 25 in air combat, eight due to mechanical problems and three destroyed on the ground by bombing.
    It took some courage for Johnson to even fly out to New Guinea during that era, and you have to credit him. He could have stayed in Brisbane schmoozing. Instead he went right to the heart of the battle front and fully intended to fly a combat mission over a Japanese stronghold.
    Harold Ickes, in his diary, writes of this episode that MacArthur offered Johnson the medal but that Johnson declined. Only some time later did Johnson receive the citation and medal in the mail.
    The award clearly was important to Johnson, and throughout his career he never missed an opportunity to wear the Silver Star pin in his lapel. You can see it in the famous swearing-in ceremony on Air Force One after the Kennedy assassination. And he wore it in his lapel for his official presidential photograph

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    I red somewhere that US Air Force suffered 1/3 of all American losses in the WWII. It was not a safe job.
    , @Anonymous
    This segues to another issue, why the Martin B-26 Marauder was made from a challenging to a dangerous airplane by insisting it be fitted with the slow-to-feather Curtiss electric propeller AND an inadequate electrical system. It was known as "One A Day In Tampa Bay" even in training.

    As I have researched and discussed with authorities imagined (Hi, Art Kramer, if you are still alive!) and real (the late Bob Hoover, almost inarguably the single greatest pilot that ever lived), the Marauder was inherently a challenging aircraft aerodynamically and one that was in advance of the level of flight instruction and knowledge at the time, but it was flyable safely with the correct technique. It was probably about as challenging as a 23 or 24 Learjet, a little more in the case of a single engine takeoff, but similar in needed technique to the early J-85 Learjets or perhaps more closely the Mitsubishi MU-2. But because the airplane had electric propellers that required many seconds to feather , engine failure on takeoff was past challenging, it was in effect a single engine aircraft incapable of sustaining flight without both engines turning. Equipping the aircraft with Ham Standard or Aeroproducts hydraulic propellers, with no other changes, would have made the aircraft far safer.

    Looking back at US WWII aircraft production, there were several examples where simple aerodynamic or mechanical changes would have saved a great number of lives and made the airplane far more effective. Other changes would simply have saved a lot of effort and money. But rarely were existing designs very thoroughly vetted in this manner.

    What the US aircraft industry was very good at is the one thing they are seemingly incapable of today: they could actually make airplanes, and a lot of them, on time and under budget.
    , @Jack D
    Thanks for all the interesting details. It's easy to forget how poorly the Pacific war was going for the Americans in the early months.

    But fundamentally, you still don't deserve a medal for riding as a passenger in the back of an airplane. High ranking political officials shouldn't have been in the war zone in the 1st place unless they were themselves pilots or doing something that was more valuable to the war effort than their regular jobs. Having these guys around tends to distract people from fighting the enemy and leads to even more casualties. Shortly after this, FDR recalled all the Congressmen in the military to Washington so they could do the jobs they were elected for and let the troops do theirs.
    , @Grandpa Charlie

    As far as Johnson is concerned, he didn’t need to volunteer to fly a combat mission, only luck prevented him from being killed on that mission, and he did not solicit a medal.

    MacArthur’s staff was merely trying to direct attention to their efforts and so, hopefully, get more supplies and reinforcements — when Johnson flew his mission, the 22nd Bomb Group he flew with was so short of personnel that aircrew serviced and armed their own planes.

    At the time of Johnson’s flight, the entire fighter strength of the Army Air Force in New Guinea was two P-39 squadrons, only based at Moresby for about 2 months, during which time they had lost 36 planes, 25 in air combat, eight due to mechanical problems and three destroyed on the ground by bombing.

    It took some courage for Johnson to even fly out to New Guinea during that era, and you have to credit him. He could have stayed in Brisbane schmoozing. Instead he went right to the heart of the battle front and fully intended to fly a combat mission over a Japanese stronghold.

    --- Whoever
     
    Thanks,Whoever, for some history!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @rogue-one
    One could also make an equivalent argument that:

    0. Whatever may be the history of Europe, it is one of the least anti-Semite places in the world today.

    1. Muslims are pretty anti-semite.

    2. Importing large numbers of young, poor, sexually frustrated muslim men into Europe would increase crime & terrorism in general and anti-semitism in particular.

    3. If the muslims ever organize politically (assuming they have sufficient ability to), they possess or will soon possess enough numbers to change European foreign policy towards Israel. This will not be good for jews & Israel.

    4. And yet, Jewish elites, media, and religious leaders seem to be huge supporters of massive muslim immigration, Merkel's boner and seem insistent on branding any anti-immigration movement as anti-semitic. This behavior seems not just wrong but frankly suicidal for them in medium and long term .

    Of course, not all Muslims are Semites, but I’m thinking a greater proportion of Muslims are Semites than are Jews, and at any rate, Muslims certainly constitute the largest proportion of Semites in the world. Even if you consider ALL Jews, even Liz, MM, Luke Ford and Sammy Davis Jr. to be Semites, that now or ever have lived, it still is no contest.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. @Jonathan Mason
    Well, yes, however the band was also associated with founding father of British blues Alexis Korner who was half Jewish and who actually gave the band its name Free. I'm not sure what "Free" was supposed to mean in this context, but I guess it was a catchy name for a band and made possible album titles like Free At Last.

    Korner (born Koerner) was an interesting fellow who was a significant career influence on artists like Cream, the Rolling Stones, Jimmy Page, Robert Plant, and Rod Stewart.

    So now you changed the subject from Free to Korner, after your ‘Free was a Jew band’ fail.

    Do better next time.

    I met all the original Free members, hung out, great group of guys, great rock band.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. @Anon 2
    Wikipedia: "Warsaw Confederation (1573) was the first European
    act granting religious freedoms." It was one of the reasons why the
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was at peace while the Western
    Europeans were butchering each other during the religious wars.

    Edict of Nantes (1598) came much later and as a legal document
    was patterned after the articles of the Warsaw Confederation.

    As one of the commenters pointed out, it's true that, similarly to the
    Jews, Poland developed a mystical sense of its own destiny
    (e.g., as Christ among nations) that, for example, guided Lech Walesa
    and John Paul II in the overthrow of Communism starting with the
    Solidarity movement (1980). Many Poles feel that they are God's
    chosen people in Europe. E.g., read the recent statements by
    Poland's new Prime Minister Morawiecki.

    I do not think that Warsaw Confederation (1573) or Edict of Nantes (1598) concerned themselves with Jews or Judaism. Jews constituted a separate caste that had special privileges and the laws of the land did not apply specifically to Jews as Jews were often exempt (sometimes to their benefit) from the laws of the land in Poland.

    As far as the “Many Poles feel that they are God’s chosen people in Europe.” nonsense, I think it has developed in late 18 and then 19 century. Somebody in Poland should look into whether the mass Fankist (Jakob Frank) conversion to Catholicism that resulted of granting gentry status to tens of thousands of Jews had anything to do with bringing the Jewish Messianic ideas into Polish culture. These ideas are responsible for many nearly suicidal acts by Poles in 19 and 20 century.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon 2
    History of Polish Messianism is absolutely fascinating.
    But it predates the Frankists (Polish Jews who converted
    en masse to Christianity in the 18th century) by at least
    a hundred years, maybe more.

    Just like the Israelites developed the idea of a covenant based
    on what they considered to be historical events (Abraham, Moses,
    Exodus, etc), the Polish became convinced that God intervened
    in their history at certain specific points in time, one of the early
    ones being (1) the defeat of the Swedish invaders at the Marian
    shrine (Jasna Gora) in Czestochowa in 1655 during The Deluge;

    (2) King Sobieski coming to the rescue of Vienna and saving
    it from the Muslim onslaught on September 11, 1683. In other
    words, Poland acting as antemurale Christianitatis, defender
    of Christianity;

    (3) The miracle on the Vistula river during The Battle of Warsaw (1920)
    in which the Polish forces defeated Russia, and prevented Communism
    from flooding into Western Europe.

    Just as the Jews, many Poles believe that God entered into
    a covenant with Poland in which the Polish have been chosen
    to play a specific role in the history of salvation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. @Whoever

    [Lyndon Johnson] got a Silver Star for taking an airplane ride and not crying for his mama.
     
    I think LBJ's volunteering for this mission showed courage---June 9, 1942, 11 B-26s, six B-17s and five B-25s escorted by eight P-39s attack in daylight the heavily-defended Japanese base at Lae. That was not some milk run by any means.
    Johnson was assigned to fly as observer in 1440-86, but there was some confusion getting the VIP passengers squared away and Lt. Col. Francis Stevens, who was escorting Johnson on his tour of the combat area, got aboard -86 and Johnson got into another plane, 1440-88.
    Because of this delay, the B-26s were late getting airborne and lagged behind the rest of the formation, losing the protection of the fighter escort and the defensive firepower of the other bombers' guns.
    On take-off, -88 suffered a generator failure. The plane stayed with the formation for a half-hour before the pilot aborted and returned to base. Johnson's diary for the day records merely, "After we were off the field with [PIC] Greer, generator went out: crew begged him to go on. For the next 30 minutes we flew on one generator."
    The early model B-26 had a marginal 12 volt electrical system. Loss of a generator put a strain on the remaining one, which was needed to control the electric props and the electric gun turret. It was SOP to abort with a generator failure because if the remaining generator failed, the aircraft would be lost.
    On nearing the target, the American force was intercepted by 24 Zeros. The B-26 Johnson had been assigned to, 40-1486, was shot down, all aboard being killed. Another B-26, 40-1363 was shot up so badly it crashed while attempting to land on the return. Four other B-26s suffered battle damage.
    While it suffered no damage on this mission, -88 was shot down on a later mission and both the pilot and co-pilot were killed.
    Normally, an observer on a combat mission would have been awarded an Air Medal. Brigadier General William Marquat, who flew on the mission in 40-1496, recommended Johnson for the Silver Star and Major General Richard Sutherland, MacArthur's chief of staff, approved it.
    The pretext for giving LBJ the Silver Star is in a letter to him from Marquat: "Your outstanding bravery in volunteering for a so-called 'suicide mission' in order to get a first-hand view of what our Army fliers go through has been subject of much favorable comment since your departure. It is indeed a great government we have when members of Congress take THOSE [sic] chances in order to better serve their fellow men in the legislative bodies. You surely earned your decoration."
    Doubtless, the award was made for reasons other than honoring Johnson's bravery, however. Consider the timing: the Battle of Midway had just ended when the mission was flown and the Battle of the Coral Sea was only a month old. The Navy was getting all the credit for fighting the Japanese, Lieutenant Commander Butch O'Hare was a household name, and the army in the southwest Pacific was being ignored. The Japanese had not yet been defeated in New Guinea and were still driving toward Port Moresby. They held control of the air and were bombing Australia.
    Journalists as well as visiting politicians were also given VIP treatment in hopes of generating publicity, and frequently flew on dangerous missions and wrote some very compelling accounts of what they witnessed.
    Hobart Skidmore, a then-famous reporter who had covered the labor unrest in the West Virginia coal mines, wrote a series of gripping articles about the New Guinea air war in those early days, describing, for example, Japanese fighters bursting through clouds to intercept American bombers, "climbing as if they had been fired from gigantic guns."
    A Life photographer wrote about his harrowing experiences when the B-26 he was flying in was torn apart by a monstrous thunderstorm. He made the mistake of opening his parachute while still in the storm and stayed aloft for over two hours and was taken so high he lost consciousness and suffered frost bite. Once he got on the ground it took him a month struggling through the jungle to get back to friendly territory. He was feted by MacArthur and given a VIP flight home.
    As far as Johnson is concerned, he didn't need to volunteer to fly a combat mission, only luck prevented him from being killed on that mission, and he did not solicit a medal.
    MacArthur's staff was merely trying to direct attention to their efforts and so, hopefully, get more supplies and reinforcements -- when Johnson flew his mission, the 22nd Bomb Group he flew with was so short of personnel that aircrew serviced and armed their own planes.
    At the time of Johnson's flight, the entire fighter strength of the Army Air Force in New Guinea was two P-39 squadrons, only based at Moresby for about 2 months, during which time they had lost 36 planes, 25 in air combat, eight due to mechanical problems and three destroyed on the ground by bombing.
    It took some courage for Johnson to even fly out to New Guinea during that era, and you have to credit him. He could have stayed in Brisbane schmoozing. Instead he went right to the heart of the battle front and fully intended to fly a combat mission over a Japanese stronghold.
    Harold Ickes, in his diary, writes of this episode that MacArthur offered Johnson the medal but that Johnson declined. Only some time later did Johnson receive the citation and medal in the mail.
    The award clearly was important to Johnson, and throughout his career he never missed an opportunity to wear the Silver Star pin in his lapel. You can see it in the famous swearing-in ceremony on Air Force One after the Kennedy assassination. And he wore it in his lapel for his official presidential photograph
    https://i.imgur.com/SX2kJYl.jpg

    I red somewhere that US Air Force suffered 1/3 of all American losses in the WWII. It was not a safe job.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Just flying around in a plane behind the lines was dangerous in WWII. Many thousands of Americans died in non-combat plane crashes.
    , @Stumpy Pepys
    The Eighth Air Force based in England suffered more casualties than the entire USMC.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    There was no US Air Force. The navy/marines had planes, and the army had planes - USAAF.
    , @Jack D
    The air losses over Europe were enormous. It's not clear that it was worth the effort in military terms. Destroying German cities did NOT stop German war production as promised. The arms factories moved underground and destroying civilian work places actually freed up people to work in war industries. Arguably, the military justification was thin and it was really intended to punish the German civilian population into surrendering. While in some ways that's not a bad strategy (if it works, which it didn't), it's also a war crime. One of the reasons why German war criminals (von Braun) didn't get punished after the war (beside the fact that we wanted their help in the Cold War) was that they hadn't done anything that we hadn't done too.

    However, long term I think it might have been a good idea because it made the Germans extremely allergic to fighting another war or signing up to follow new dictators. One of the reasons why they had not learned this lesson during WWI is that their cities were largely intact at the end of that war. But it was an expensive lesson to teach for the Allies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Whoever

    [Lyndon Johnson] got a Silver Star for taking an airplane ride and not crying for his mama.
     
    I think LBJ's volunteering for this mission showed courage---June 9, 1942, 11 B-26s, six B-17s and five B-25s escorted by eight P-39s attack in daylight the heavily-defended Japanese base at Lae. That was not some milk run by any means.
    Johnson was assigned to fly as observer in 1440-86, but there was some confusion getting the VIP passengers squared away and Lt. Col. Francis Stevens, who was escorting Johnson on his tour of the combat area, got aboard -86 and Johnson got into another plane, 1440-88.
    Because of this delay, the B-26s were late getting airborne and lagged behind the rest of the formation, losing the protection of the fighter escort and the defensive firepower of the other bombers' guns.
    On take-off, -88 suffered a generator failure. The plane stayed with the formation for a half-hour before the pilot aborted and returned to base. Johnson's diary for the day records merely, "After we were off the field with [PIC] Greer, generator went out: crew begged him to go on. For the next 30 minutes we flew on one generator."
    The early model B-26 had a marginal 12 volt electrical system. Loss of a generator put a strain on the remaining one, which was needed to control the electric props and the electric gun turret. It was SOP to abort with a generator failure because if the remaining generator failed, the aircraft would be lost.
    On nearing the target, the American force was intercepted by 24 Zeros. The B-26 Johnson had been assigned to, 40-1486, was shot down, all aboard being killed. Another B-26, 40-1363 was shot up so badly it crashed while attempting to land on the return. Four other B-26s suffered battle damage.
    While it suffered no damage on this mission, -88 was shot down on a later mission and both the pilot and co-pilot were killed.
    Normally, an observer on a combat mission would have been awarded an Air Medal. Brigadier General William Marquat, who flew on the mission in 40-1496, recommended Johnson for the Silver Star and Major General Richard Sutherland, MacArthur's chief of staff, approved it.
    The pretext for giving LBJ the Silver Star is in a letter to him from Marquat: "Your outstanding bravery in volunteering for a so-called 'suicide mission' in order to get a first-hand view of what our Army fliers go through has been subject of much favorable comment since your departure. It is indeed a great government we have when members of Congress take THOSE [sic] chances in order to better serve their fellow men in the legislative bodies. You surely earned your decoration."
    Doubtless, the award was made for reasons other than honoring Johnson's bravery, however. Consider the timing: the Battle of Midway had just ended when the mission was flown and the Battle of the Coral Sea was only a month old. The Navy was getting all the credit for fighting the Japanese, Lieutenant Commander Butch O'Hare was a household name, and the army in the southwest Pacific was being ignored. The Japanese had not yet been defeated in New Guinea and were still driving toward Port Moresby. They held control of the air and were bombing Australia.
    Journalists as well as visiting politicians were also given VIP treatment in hopes of generating publicity, and frequently flew on dangerous missions and wrote some very compelling accounts of what they witnessed.
    Hobart Skidmore, a then-famous reporter who had covered the labor unrest in the West Virginia coal mines, wrote a series of gripping articles about the New Guinea air war in those early days, describing, for example, Japanese fighters bursting through clouds to intercept American bombers, "climbing as if they had been fired from gigantic guns."
    A Life photographer wrote about his harrowing experiences when the B-26 he was flying in was torn apart by a monstrous thunderstorm. He made the mistake of opening his parachute while still in the storm and stayed aloft for over two hours and was taken so high he lost consciousness and suffered frost bite. Once he got on the ground it took him a month struggling through the jungle to get back to friendly territory. He was feted by MacArthur and given a VIP flight home.
    As far as Johnson is concerned, he didn't need to volunteer to fly a combat mission, only luck prevented him from being killed on that mission, and he did not solicit a medal.
    MacArthur's staff was merely trying to direct attention to their efforts and so, hopefully, get more supplies and reinforcements -- when Johnson flew his mission, the 22nd Bomb Group he flew with was so short of personnel that aircrew serviced and armed their own planes.
    At the time of Johnson's flight, the entire fighter strength of the Army Air Force in New Guinea was two P-39 squadrons, only based at Moresby for about 2 months, during which time they had lost 36 planes, 25 in air combat, eight due to mechanical problems and three destroyed on the ground by bombing.
    It took some courage for Johnson to even fly out to New Guinea during that era, and you have to credit him. He could have stayed in Brisbane schmoozing. Instead he went right to the heart of the battle front and fully intended to fly a combat mission over a Japanese stronghold.
    Harold Ickes, in his diary, writes of this episode that MacArthur offered Johnson the medal but that Johnson declined. Only some time later did Johnson receive the citation and medal in the mail.
    The award clearly was important to Johnson, and throughout his career he never missed an opportunity to wear the Silver Star pin in his lapel. You can see it in the famous swearing-in ceremony on Air Force One after the Kennedy assassination. And he wore it in his lapel for his official presidential photograph
    https://i.imgur.com/SX2kJYl.jpg

    This segues to another issue, why the Martin B-26 Marauder was made from a challenging to a dangerous airplane by insisting it be fitted with the slow-to-feather Curtiss electric propeller AND an inadequate electrical system. It was known as “One A Day In Tampa Bay” even in training.

    As I have researched and discussed with authorities imagined (Hi, Art Kramer, if you are still alive!) and real (the late Bob Hoover, almost inarguably the single greatest pilot that ever lived), the Marauder was inherently a challenging aircraft aerodynamically and one that was in advance of the level of flight instruction and knowledge at the time, but it was flyable safely with the correct technique. It was probably about as challenging as a 23 or 24 Learjet, a little more in the case of a single engine takeoff, but similar in needed technique to the early J-85 Learjets or perhaps more closely the Mitsubishi MU-2. But because the airplane had electric propellers that required many seconds to feather , engine failure on takeoff was past challenging, it was in effect a single engine aircraft incapable of sustaining flight without both engines turning. Equipping the aircraft with Ham Standard or Aeroproducts hydraulic propellers, with no other changes, would have made the aircraft far safer.

    Looking back at US WWII aircraft production, there were several examples where simple aerodynamic or mechanical changes would have saved a great number of lives and made the airplane far more effective. Other changes would simply have saved a lot of effort and money. But rarely were existing designs very thoroughly vetted in this manner.

    What the US aircraft industry was very good at is the one thing they are seemingly incapable of today: they could actually make airplanes, and a lot of them, on time and under budget.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Discard
    The Martin B-26 was a state of the art, high performance aircraft. It had more teething problems than were usual because the Army was so desperate for planes that they placed a big order to be delivered yesterday. The normal problems had to be sorted out by active duty crews instead of by test pilots.
    One interesting fix was to take only men who had finished in the top third of their training as pilots. The B-25, a simpler plane with lower performance got the second string crews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @Svigor
    Jack D, the boilerplate Jewish lectures on The American Way don't persuade, because Israel. You guys don't believe your own lectures.

    You guys don’t believe your own lectures.

    Who says that Jewish lecturers should believe their own lectures? Jews haven’t adopted Kant’s moral imperatives. They do not operate this way.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    At the risk of sounding world-weary, I sometimes wonder if they believe anything they say. It's all for public consumption, rather, and it's sometimes difficult to resist imagining the sound of teeth gnashing and hands rubbing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. I don’t quite get Rothschild’s motivation for that tweet, but the affirmative action angle seems like the sort of Rube Goldberg-style analysis Steve often mocks Jews for.

    One minor clarification though about the place where the Bangladeshi terrorist detonated his explosive: it’s not a tourist site but a huge commuter gateway, the Port Authority Bus Terminal. My girlfriend goes through it every workday on her way to her office in Midtown. And if Rothschild is interested in her opinion, she would be fine with a reduction in Bangladeshi immigration.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments