The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Guardian: "Number of Child Sexual Abuse Victims in Rotherham Raised to 1,510"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From The Guardian:

Number of child sexual abuse victims in Rotherham raised to 1,510

National Crime Agency analysis suggests number is higher than 1,400 identified in 2014 Jay report

Josh Halliday North of England correspondent

Tue 20 Feb 2018 06.20 EST

… The National Crime Agency (NCA) detectives revealed the updated figure on Tuesday in a briefing on Operation Stovewood, the investigation into child sexual exploitation over a 16-year period in the South Yorkshire town. Prof Alexis Jay’s report in 2014 identified 1,400 victims.

Keep in mind that Rotherham is hardly unique. It mostly just happened to be the first English municipality to commission an official report by an honest researcher. (For example, I wrote about this vast problem in 2013, a year before I ever heard of Rotherham.)

The NCA inquiry, the biggest of its kind in the UK, has identified 110 suspects, of whom 80% are of Pakistani heritage, officers said.

Of the 110, 38 have been arrested, 18 have been charged, two cautioned and four have been convicted and handed prison sentences totalling over 30 years.

Good work, coppers! Four convictions out of 110 suspects in four years …

I’m reminded of the Danny Boyle movie Millions where the residents of a pleasant English suburb are told:

Policeman: Christmas is coming, so your home will be broken into and burglarized. But, we’re here to help.

Homeowner: To prevent crimes or to punish the criminals?

Policeman: Neither. But when you are burgled, we’ll come round and give you an official victimization number so you can file a claim with your insurance company.

Thirty-four investigations are continuing under the Operation Stovewood umbrella, officers said, with six trials to take place later this year.

Of the 1,510 potential victims, detectives said 260 – 17% – were speaking to officers but that police aimed to talk to every victim. The vast majority of victims were white British girls aged 11 to 18, police said.

 
Hide 87 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Be fair, the police is a safe job with a pension* and the abusers were low profile (parking right outside their victims’ schools to collect them, driving about in a Bentley ect).

    *https://www.thestar.co.uk/news/rotherham-dads-were-arrested-after-tracking-down-abusers-1-6807187

    *http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4296438/No-evidence-police-misconduct-Rotherham-IPCC-probe.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. The vast majority of victims were white British girls aged 11 to 18, police said.

    Hey, 11 year-old girls getting raped by Muslims is simply the price that Britain must pay for the blessings of diversity.

    The NCA inquiry, the biggest of its kind in the UK, has identified 110 suspects, of whom 80% are of Pakistani heritage, officers said.

    White criminals are so stale and pale; Pakistanis, in contrast, are vibrant….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Barnard
    They gave up their right to own firearms 20 years ago and the government won't do anything. What are their options?
    , @Anonym
    How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    What do you think Brexit was?

    Also remember in Britain only criminals and a few hunters and sport shooters have access to some guns. What would you personally do in that situation?

    Of course, if you no longer wanted to live you would have more options.
    , @YetAnotherAnon
    A chap called Nick Griffin, leader of the British National Party, was put on trial (IIRC in 2004) under "hate speech" laws for

    a) alleging that this sort of abuse was widespread

    b) predicting that there would be terrorist attacks by British-born Muslims

    c) and that terrorists would use the burka (tent-like garment hiding the face and everything else) as disguise.

    All three have been proven true. He was acquitted, but "the process is the punishment". Britons like Tommy Robinson, convicted under "hate speech" laws, find they are sharing a cell with Muslims and being beaten up.

    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    They don't see color. What is a "Pakistani" but a label, a social construct. There are white pimps too. Everybody is the same - except when the differences are good.

    All of this garbage has been swallowed hook, line and sinker by whites in Western Europe and North America. We have no ability to even think as a people anymore, to think at all.

    But it can't last because other groups don't buy any of it. The Muslims sure as hell don't. Somebody disses Mohammed and they get a bullet to the brain. Some gays parade a Muslim neighborhood and they get an ass kicking. Some feminists protest for women's rights in front of a mosque and their cars get smashed up. Some school director prevents Muslim kids from praying all day or demanding a different cirriculum and she'll notice men trailing her at night and maybe threatening her.

    White men may have lost their masculinity and religion, but other men haven't. They will fight for their people and their beliefs. Even if they're not very good at it, they still win because we don't even show up.

    Especially for Europe, I find it hard to believe that 50 or 100 years from now one of two things didn't happen. Either whites found their identity again and fought back or Muslims and Africans basically took over and white just blended in. But what has little chance of surviving is this feminized "We are the World"/Diversity Uber Alles culture. It's just too vulnerable, too easy to game and take over.
    , @AndrewR
    Englishmen don't really even run the country. The PM is a female and the mayor of London, the world's most important city (perhaps outside of NYC), is a Paki Moslem.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. This a #metoo moment. The Grooming victims should begin tweeting the name of the local Police supervisor who ignored their rape and abuse for a decade.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Related:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. Nigel Farage on Muslim Rape Gangs in Rotherham

    Nigel Farage:

    “The reason that the blind eye was turned is because race was an issue. Had these offenders been from a different race, I suspect more would have been done earlier. That is not an extraordinary thing to say, that is pretty much an accepted fact.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @larry lurker

    “The reason that the blind eye was turned is because race was an issue. Had these offenders been from a different race, I suspect more would have been done earlier. That is not an extraordinary thing to say, that is pretty much an accepted fact.”
     
    Indeed, it's even mentioned in the executive summary of the Jay Report (PDF):

    By far the majority of perpetrators were described as 'Asian' by victims, yet throughout the entire period, councillors did not engage directly with the Pakistani-heritage community to discuss how best they could jointly address the issue. Some councillors seemed to think it was a one-off problem, which they hoped would go away. Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.
     
    , @Curmudgeon
    In 2004, the BNP's Nick Griffin was arrested and charged for inciting hatred, because he spoke about the grooming gangs and who was behind them, while at a constituency meeting.
    Farage's stated goal was to destroy the BNP, likely because they opposed all immigration and wanted to repatriate the non-Whites. Farage, by helping destroy the BNP, has been part of the problem, not the solution.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. As horrific as this tragedy was, if diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gary in Gramercy
    That's the commanding officer at Fort Hood, Texas, after that Muslim psychiatrist nutcake (physician, heal thyself...) killed a bunch of innocents, right? Perfect.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Read More
    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
    That's the typical behavior of conquering warriors.
    , @eah
    Asian grooming gangs abused 700 girls and vulnerable women with 'arrogant persistence' because they were 'not investigated' before major operation was launched to stop them

    Report into authorities' response to child sexual exploitation in Newcastle -- Series of trials saw 22 defendants sentenced for rape, drugs and prostitution -- Review has been hit by just one defendant agreeing to help - who denied guilt -- A 150-page report has been published into the authorities' response to child sexual exploitation (CSE) in Newcastle, following a series of trials which saw 22 defendants sentenced for a range of offences including rape, drugs and prostitution -- Efforts to find out why the perpetrators thought they could abuse vulnerable women and girls have been rebuffed, with only one defendant agreeing to help the inquiry, and he denied guilt, blaming a government cover up -- But before 2014, the report stated that perpetrators were not consistently investigated and so went unpunished -- The report said: 'This sent an unhelpful message to perpetrators - they were unlikely to be prosecuted or prevented from continuing to abuse - encouraging an arrogant persistence -- 'It also had a significant impact on victims who learnt that nothing would be done against perpetrators.'

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Read More
    • LOL: Cloudbuster
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. @Thea
    How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    They gave up their right to own firearms 20 years ago and the government won’t do anything. What are their options?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
    In Rwanda, the Sudan, Somalia and elsewhere, highly motivated individuals seem to be doing quite well with machetes.
    , @Bill
    It is very easy to manufacture "good enough" firearms and explosives. And, as cloudbuster mentions, knives and clubs work great. Gun control is not the problem.
    , @jim jones
    My neighbour here in London has a shotgun, all you need to do is get a license:

    http://www.shootinguk.co.uk/shooting/start-shooting/how-to-get-shotgun-certificate-licence-32358
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. You probably shouldn’t make plans to visit the UK after posting that. You are no doubt on the same ban list as that Savage guy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    You are no doubt on the same ban list as that Savage guy.
     
    I think they just won't let you in if they know you are going to speak to a lot of people, telling the truth and all that rubbish. Mr. Sailer could pass under the radar at this point, but I would like to be wrong on that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Part of the reason why white girls are targeted:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Birmingham_riots

    The Birmingham riots of 2005 occurred on two consecutive nights on Saturday 22 October and Sunday 23 October 2005 in the Lozells and Handsworth area of Birmingham, England. The riots were derived from ethnic tensions between the Caribbean and British Asian communities, with the spark for the riot being an alleged gang rape of a teenage black girl by a group of South Asian men.

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/how-muslims-are-kept-mostly-peaceful-in-india/

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    This. We are going to have to be like them, at least develop a capacity to think like them. We must remember how to think tribally. Imagine any outsider deliberately entering a Sicilian neighborhood in New Jersey in the mid-sixties, expressly to hit on teenage girls. That's what we need.
    , @Tex
    Rioting was defended as constitutional by John Adams, among others, in the 1770s. At the time America was still a set of English colonies, and the unwritten English constitution formed a nebulous sort of "higher law" in the background of written law.

    Americans would get outraged by the high-handed behavior of tax authorities and respond by trashing the tax office, roughing up the excisemen, and burning their papers. Englishmen did similar things, though often on a bigger scale (the Gordon Riots for instance). Generally the mob violence was pretty focused on the objects of outrage, ie they'd loot the East India Company's tea warehouse, not the local dry goods store.

    Adams argued that this was simply how you got redress when you had no other means of moving the authorities, hence it was constitutional. It may have been a self-serving argument, but no one else seems to have been serving the colonists in this matter.

    Pauline Maeir's From Resistance to Revolution goes into some detail on the idea of the constitutional riot.

    As the Clash noted, a riot can be a practical solution to a problem.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. @Thea
    How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    What do you think Brexit was?

    Also remember in Britain only criminals and a few hunters and sport shooters have access to some guns. What would you personally do in that situation?

    Of course, if you no longer wanted to live you would have more options.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. @Thea
    How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    A chap called Nick Griffin, leader of the British National Party, was put on trial (IIRC in 2004) under “hate speech” laws for

    a) alleging that this sort of abuse was widespread

    b) predicting that there would be terrorist attacks by British-born Muslims

    c) and that terrorists would use the burka (tent-like garment hiding the face and everything else) as disguise.

    All three have been proven true. He was acquitted, but “the process is the punishment”. Britons like Tommy Robinson, convicted under “hate speech” laws, find they are sharing a cell with Muslims and being beaten up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Related: Danny Boyle (Millions director) directed the opening ceremony of the 2012 London Olympic games, replete with images of black Britons taking over —there’s an extended bit where a mixed race teenage girl with a black father and white mother parties goes out and parties night away with her also-dark-skinned boyfriend and some club, grinding away in a way that stripper would’ve been embarrassed of just 40 years ago.

    And of course the Queen embarrassed and lowered herself to being in a sad sketch involving James Bond, debasing the entire Royal position. That part shocked me the most, as the Queen seemed to be the last remaining stiff-upper-lip Brit who knew to act serious and noble in public.

    Of course, Boyle’s parents were Irish, so perhaps he gets off on the idea of Blighty becoming blighted.

    All in all, the 2012 opening ceremonies–and lack of outrage about them— had me firmly convinced that England was dead and buried as a culture. Brexit and Tommy Robinson, however, have convinced me that all is not lost for Albion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johan Schmidt
    Couldn't agree with you more. 2012 opening ceremony was my watershed moment: it ensured that I would eventually switch from a completely cucked open-borders libertarian to a nationalist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. @eah
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DWfoxKxWkAEZUgl.jpg

    That’s the typical behavior of conquering warriors.

    Read More
    • Agree: ben tillman
    • Replies: @eah
    conquering warriors

    How would you describe the behavior of the Brits who looked the other way/allowed it to go on?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. @Barnard
    They gave up their right to own firearms 20 years ago and the government won't do anything. What are their options?

    In Rwanda, the Sudan, Somalia and elsewhere, highly motivated individuals seem to be doing quite well with machetes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Saxon
    Your machetes won't do so well to their guns (which they have because the law looks the other way except when they commit the most egregious crimes) and their oppressive occupational government as defender's guns. The English are an embattled people with an occupation government invading them with brown mercenaries and letting those brown mercenaries rape their daughters and in some cases forcefully impregnate them with mongrel children, and they can do or say nothing without being jailed by the surveillance state which only watches them.

    You don't understand that both the invaders and government are in cahoots. They've been brought in, the government allows them to commit daily atrocity and only when the government can't hide it or cover it up do the brown invaders get jailed at all. The rape gangs were going on for a QUARTER CENTURY before Rotherham broke. The authorities knew! They did nothing. They ran Nick Griffin and other BNP members through the ringer for talking about it before the big reveal and now it's been revealed that virtually anywhere these disgusting brown people live in the country, this is happening.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. The BBC covered up Jimmy Saville’s rape-and-molestation fest for 30+ years. We should not think that such sex gangs are merely for Muslim men; instead, they are feeders for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions.

    In other words, the BBC and Muslim rape gangs are not unconnected.

    Read More
    • Replies: @notanon
    "The BBC covered up Jimmy Saville’s rape-and-molestation fest for 30+ years. "

    it's true the media always cover up for VIP pedophiles and rapists but they only cover up for pleb rapists when it contradicts PC


    they are feeders for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions
     
    it's very likely some politicians had a taste but the main reason for the grooming gangs is/was to supply the demand for ultra cheap prostitution caused by mass immigration of cheap labor who send most of their money home as remittances.

    the same thing happens among other cheap labor immigrant groups but the gangs involved in those cases mostly traffic girls from their own ethnic group back home cos it's harder to detect

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/opinion/getting-tough-on-sex-traffickers.html

    the big difference with Muslims (apart from any specific racial/cultural/religious elements) is because girls from their own group are locked away they have to target girls from the native population instead.

    , @James N. Kennett

    The BBC covered up Jimmy Saville’s rape-and-molestation fest for 30+ years. We should not think that such sex gangs are merely for Muslim men; instead, they are feeders for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions.

    In other words, the BBC and Muslim rape gangs are not unconnected.
     
    How are they connected? Do you know any reports of Muslims procuring women or children for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    As horrific as this tragedy was, if diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.

    That’s the commanding officer at Fort Hood, Texas, after that Muslim psychiatrist nutcake (physician, heal thyself…) killed a bunch of innocents, right? Perfect.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    You are correct, sir.
    , @L Woods
    “Our” military “leadership”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. @Thea
    How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    They don’t see color. What is a “Pakistani” but a label, a social construct. There are white pimps too. Everybody is the same – except when the differences are good.

    All of this garbage has been swallowed hook, line and sinker by whites in Western Europe and North America. We have no ability to even think as a people anymore, to think at all.

    But it can’t last because other groups don’t buy any of it. The Muslims sure as hell don’t. Somebody disses Mohammed and they get a bullet to the brain. Some gays parade a Muslim neighborhood and they get an ass kicking. Some feminists protest for women’s rights in front of a mosque and their cars get smashed up. Some school director prevents Muslim kids from praying all day or demanding a different cirriculum and she’ll notice men trailing her at night and maybe threatening her.

    White men may have lost their masculinity and religion, but other men haven’t. They will fight for their people and their beliefs. Even if they’re not very good at it, they still win because we don’t even show up.

    Especially for Europe, I find it hard to believe that 50 or 100 years from now one of two things didn’t happen. Either whites found their identity again and fought back or Muslims and Africans basically took over and white just blended in. But what has little chance of surviving is this feminized “We are the World”/Diversity Uber Alles culture. It’s just too vulnerable, too easy to game and take over.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thea
    I don't understand how it got to this point where they don't stop the rape of their women.

    Is it TV? It had to start way before smart phones. British inner city youth were to be feared at one time.

    These people gave the world punk rock and now they care about hurting others feelings?

    , @El Dato
    "I don't know what a "social construct" is but I can recognize it when I meet it in the street"

    What is a “Pakistani” but a label, a social construct.
     
    Yet another one from the "everything is unreal and also fluid and therefore exchangeable" dazed & confused postmodern sloganbox.

    Everybody is the same – except when the differences are good.
     
    We have arrived at the "everything sucks" final step of argumentation?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. This piece is about one of the E. Lazarus “wretched and poor”. This one’s from the Congo.

    https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Bridgeport-man-charged-in-murder-of-teen-12626388.php

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. An Uncomfortable Truth

    Andrew Norfolk, chief investigative reporter for The [UK] Times, talks through his four year investigation into ‘the lost girls of Rotherham’ at Shift North 2015.

    Video worth spending 19 mins on – here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. The year’s 2058.

    “If we didn’t fight the Nazis in WWII, we’d all be speaking German Today!” said the British man in Arabic.

    Read More
    • Agree: L Woods
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. @The Alarmist
    You probably shouldn't make plans to visit the UK after posting that. You are no doubt on the same ban list as that Savage guy.

    You are no doubt on the same ban list as that Savage guy.

    I think they just won’t let you in if they know you are going to speak to a lot of people, telling the truth and all that rubbish. Mr. Sailer could pass under the radar at this point, but I would like to be wrong on that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Pakistanis, the gift that keeps on giving:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/rotherham-12-pakistani-community-south-yorkshire-police-islamophobia-a8209991.html

    The 12 Pakistani men from Rotherham you probably haven’t heard about

    The Rotherham 12 Defence Campaign shows how media sensationalism and dangerous political rhetoric can lead to injustice

    Muhbeen Hussain Wednesday 14 February 2018 11:45 GMT

    If, after reading the headline, you for one reason or another presumed this had something to do with child sexual exploitation (CSE) because of the mere mention of a group of Pakistani men from Rotherham, then you have learnt lesson number one in structural racism. The presumption of guilt based on a stereotype of a race.

    These 12 Pakistani men, what later became known as part of the “Rotherham 12 Defence Campaign”, were all charged with violent disorder and not CSE – and that’s why you’ve probably never heard about them. The Rotherham 12 Defence Campaign highlights how media sensationalism and dangerous political rhetoric leads to injustice, and makes justice a political act – not a legal one.

    … So what did these men do to deserve a dawn raid and serious criminal charges? On 5 September 2015, they attended an anti-fascism march after the racist murder of 81-year-old Mushin Ahmed in their town. On the same day Britain First also staged a protest, and hundreds of police were deployed to keep the marches separate.

    When the police channelled the anti-fascist march down a road that had a pub on it frequented by far-right protesters, a clash between the two groups occurred after racist abuse was hurled. This followed months of the community feeling besieged and afraid to leave their homes due to incessant far-right marches in the city. Only one punch was thrown, yet all 12 were arrested, charged and put on trial.

    During the trial, the prosecution made clear that the “other side” had started the clash – but that the actions of the 12 men could not be justified as self-defence. This was rubbished in court, and all of the men have now been acquitted after three years of hell.

    So why are you only just finding out about this horrendous situation now? Let me say it for what it is: the rise of Islamophobia in Rotherham. The people of Rotherham have been subjected to vile verbal abuse on streets, in schools and in the town centre. Bomb threats to mosques; 14 far-right demonstrations within a year radicalising a local community; innocent taxi drivers forced into intensive care units; the murder of an 81-year-old grandfather who was walking to the mosque; and the wrongful arrest of these 12 men.

    Also, we all remember why child sexual exploitation was so prevalent in Rotherham. It was because the police were too scared to make arrests due to political correctness, wasn’t it? I’m sorry, but this is far from the truth. Even the current top cop in South Yorkshire is on record as saying that political correctness played no part in their past failures. Nevertheless, to deflect from their own incompetence South Yorkshire Police had to now show everyone that they were getting “tough” on the Pakistani community, to make up for their previous shortcoming.

    “Actually, Rotherham wasn’t due to political correctness, because look how the police persecute us!”

    Then what was it due to? He doesn’t say…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    "The people of Rotherham have been subjected to vile verbal abuse on streets, in schools and in the town centre. Bomb threats to mosques; 14 far-right demonstrations within a year radicalising a local community; innocent taxi drivers forced into intensive care units; the murder of an 81-year-old grandfather who was walking to the mosque; and the wrongful arrest of these 12 men."

    I suspect this is a bunch of bs. But if it is true, I call it a good start and hope it continues.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. I wonder if there are any cables involving the u.s. embassy stating the need for more tolerance in Rotherham from the local English?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. One child is a tragedy, 1,500 are a statistic

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derby_child_sex_abuse_ring

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle_sex_abuse_ring

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring

    If you were a British cop which would you rather deal with a child abuse scandal, or south asian immigrants who weren’t getting any?

    If you are a root cause type person, the root cause of the Rotherham and other sex scandals was British Imperialism, and a crazy deal to get a dam built in Pakistan by relocating displaced people to the UK.

    Migration from Mirpur and its adjacent areas started soon after World War II as most of the male population of this area and Pothohar worked in the British armed forces. However, more migrated because of the Mangla Dam, which was built in the 1960s and eventually flooded the surrounding farmland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mirpuris

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. Good work, coppers! Four convictions out of 110 suspects in four years …

    At that rate, they’ll rival Detroit’s thousands of “misplaced” rape kits in no time at all..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. Of the 110, 38 have been arrested, 18 have been charged, two cautioned and four have been convicted and handed prison sentences totalling over 30 years.

    That’s “totalling” [sic] 30 years, or average of 7.5 years of prison with probably an early release, for each of the 10% of the arrested that got sentences (yes, I know “arrested” is not “convicted”., but it’s probably hard to get good witness testimony) What in the hell does “cautioned” mean? “I severely caution you not to rape more than a few girls a year, old chap. OK? Right, then. Brilliant. Next rapist please …”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    They don't see color. What is a "Pakistani" but a label, a social construct. There are white pimps too. Everybody is the same - except when the differences are good.

    All of this garbage has been swallowed hook, line and sinker by whites in Western Europe and North America. We have no ability to even think as a people anymore, to think at all.

    But it can't last because other groups don't buy any of it. The Muslims sure as hell don't. Somebody disses Mohammed and they get a bullet to the brain. Some gays parade a Muslim neighborhood and they get an ass kicking. Some feminists protest for women's rights in front of a mosque and their cars get smashed up. Some school director prevents Muslim kids from praying all day or demanding a different cirriculum and she'll notice men trailing her at night and maybe threatening her.

    White men may have lost their masculinity and religion, but other men haven't. They will fight for their people and their beliefs. Even if they're not very good at it, they still win because we don't even show up.

    Especially for Europe, I find it hard to believe that 50 or 100 years from now one of two things didn't happen. Either whites found their identity again and fought back or Muslims and Africans basically took over and white just blended in. But what has little chance of surviving is this feminized "We are the World"/Diversity Uber Alles culture. It's just too vulnerable, too easy to game and take over.

    I don’t understand how it got to this point where they don’t stop the rape of their women.

    Is it TV? It had to start way before smart phones. British inner city youth were to be feared at one time.

    These people gave the world punk rock and now they care about hurting others feelings?

    Read More
    • Replies: @George
    Low birthrate means few yobs to fear.

    Then there was the exemplary justice: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Notting_Hill_race_riots
    , @Saxon
    Totalitarian state which only enforces the laws one-way. It's called anarcho-tyranny. They are allowed to rape our girls wholesale but if we so much as make a peep about it or try to organize political resistance to it, it's off to the government gulag with the worst of the violent brown criminal invaders as cellmates. An edgy youth movement in Britain called National Action spreading awareness of such issues was banned as a "terrorist" group under the flimsy pretext that an ANONYMOUS user on twitter who claimed to be part of their group said that the MP Jo Cox deserved to die. And when the people who were in it formed new groups, they then were arrested and have been tossed behind bars.

    You really don't understand that it's the whole system against indigenous resistance to this illegal genetic modification program no one wanted, no one voted for it, no one even had any serious debate about and which was implemented from the top-down with no consent.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. @Thea
    How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    Englishmen don’t really even run the country. The PM is a female and the mayor of London, the world’s most important city (perhaps outside of NYC), is a Paki Moslem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. @Gary in Gramercy
    That's the commanding officer at Fort Hood, Texas, after that Muslim psychiatrist nutcake (physician, heal thyself...) killed a bunch of innocents, right? Perfect.

    You are correct, sir.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. @Anonymous
    Pakistanis, the gift that keeps on giving:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/rotherham-12-pakistani-community-south-yorkshire-police-islamophobia-a8209991.html


    The 12 Pakistani men from Rotherham you probably haven’t heard about

    The Rotherham 12 Defence Campaign shows how media sensationalism and dangerous political rhetoric can lead to injustice

    Muhbeen Hussain Wednesday 14 February 2018 11:45 GMT

    If, after reading the headline, you for one reason or another presumed this had something to do with child sexual exploitation (CSE) because of the mere mention of a group of Pakistani men from Rotherham, then you have learnt lesson number one in structural racism. The presumption of guilt based on a stereotype of a race.

    These 12 Pakistani men, what later became known as part of the “Rotherham 12 Defence Campaign”, were all charged with violent disorder and not CSE – and that’s why you’ve probably never heard about them. The Rotherham 12 Defence Campaign highlights how media sensationalism and dangerous political rhetoric leads to injustice, and makes justice a political act – not a legal one.

    ... So what did these men do to deserve a dawn raid and serious criminal charges? On 5 September 2015, they attended an anti-fascism march after the racist murder of 81-year-old Mushin Ahmed in their town. On the same day Britain First also staged a protest, and hundreds of police were deployed to keep the marches separate.

    When the police channelled the anti-fascist march down a road that had a pub on it frequented by far-right protesters, a clash between the two groups occurred after racist abuse was hurled. This followed months of the community feeling besieged and afraid to leave their homes due to incessant far-right marches in the city. Only one punch was thrown, yet all 12 were arrested, charged and put on trial.

    During the trial, the prosecution made clear that the “other side” had started the clash – but that the actions of the 12 men could not be justified as self-defence. This was rubbished in court, and all of the men have now been acquitted after three years of hell.

    So why are you only just finding out about this horrendous situation now? Let me say it for what it is: the rise of Islamophobia in Rotherham. The people of Rotherham have been subjected to vile verbal abuse on streets, in schools and in the town centre. Bomb threats to mosques; 14 far-right demonstrations within a year radicalising a local community; innocent taxi drivers forced into intensive care units; the murder of an 81-year-old grandfather who was walking to the mosque; and the wrongful arrest of these 12 men.

    ... Also, we all remember why child sexual exploitation was so prevalent in Rotherham. It was because the police were too scared to make arrests due to political correctness, wasn’t it? I’m sorry, but this is far from the truth. Even the current top cop in South Yorkshire is on record as saying that political correctness played no part in their past failures. Nevertheless, to deflect from their own incompetence South Yorkshire Police had to now show everyone that they were getting “tough” on the Pakistani community, to make up for their previous shortcoming.
     

    "Actually, Rotherham wasn't due to political correctness, because look how the police persecute us!"

    Then what was it due to? He doesn't say...

    “The people of Rotherham have been subjected to vile verbal abuse on streets, in schools and in the town centre. Bomb threats to mosques; 14 far-right demonstrations within a year radicalising a local community; innocent taxi drivers forced into intensive care units; the murder of an 81-year-old grandfather who was walking to the mosque; and the wrongful arrest of these 12 men.”

    I suspect this is a bunch of bs. But if it is true, I call it a good start and hope it continues.

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    >"The people of Rotherham"
    >proceeds to apparently describe Muslims [in Rotherham?] claiming Islamophobia, because they never lie about that
    No matter how many children get abused, the real victims and the focus of mass media attention must always be military age Muslim men.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Keep in mind that Rotherham is hardly unique.

    list of court cases reported in various local newspapers around the UK (usually not reported nationally)

    http://www.englishdefenceleague.org.uk/islam/grooming-gangs/

    It mostly just happened to be the first English municipality to commission an official report by an honest researcher.

    only honest researcher

    the rest were done internally i.e. by the same child services who ignored the problem in the first place – surprisingly they exonerated themselves

    and four have been convicted and handed prison sentences totalling over 30 years.

    iirc at least one already released.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. @whorefinder
    The BBC covered up Jimmy Saville's rape-and-molestation fest for 30+ years. We should not think that such sex gangs are merely for Muslim men; instead, they are feeders for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions.

    In other words, the BBC and Muslim rape gangs are not unconnected.

    “The BBC covered up Jimmy Saville’s rape-and-molestation fest for 30+ years. ”

    it’s true the media always cover up for VIP pedophiles and rapists but they only cover up for pleb rapists when it contradicts PC

    they are feeders for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions

    it’s very likely some politicians had a taste but the main reason for the grooming gangs is/was to supply the demand for ultra cheap prostitution caused by mass immigration of cheap labor who send most of their money home as remittances.

    the same thing happens among other cheap labor immigrant groups but the gangs involved in those cases mostly traffic girls from their own ethnic group back home cos it’s harder to detect

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/opinion/getting-tough-on-sex-traffickers.html

    the big difference with Muslims (apart from any specific racial/cultural/religious elements) is because girls from their own group are locked away they have to target girls from the native population instead.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. @Gary in Gramercy
    That's the commanding officer at Fort Hood, Texas, after that Muslim psychiatrist nutcake (physician, heal thyself...) killed a bunch of innocents, right? Perfect.

    “Our” military “leadership”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Any breakdown of the population of Rotherham by age, gender and race?
    It seems like that many victims would actually be a sizeable proportion of the the white teenaged female population of the city.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    Per Wikipedia, there are a bit above 100k people in Rotherham USD, of which about 86% (and falling) were white British, and 8.6% (and rising) were "Asian".

    So 90k white British Rotherhamites ÷ 2 = 45k females ≈ 5000 11-18 year old girls = about one in three or four were raped!

    So the first time that the old feminist canard about 1 in 4 women being raped actually turns out to be documentarily true, they suddenly don't want to talk about it. This is dispositive evidence that feminism has nothing to do with femininity per se, but is just the distaff flavor of civilization wrecking.

    P.S. 9000 Asians ÷ 2 = 4500 Asian males ≈ 2500 post-pubescent/pre-impotent Asian Rotherhamite men. If the victims were pimped to "hundreds" ... 1500 × 100s = 150,000s. Undoubtedly many were repeat customers, and a few may have commuted from outside Rotherham (but why bother when every town seems to have this?), but 150000/2500 = at least 60 rapes per sexually active Rotherhamite Asian male sure looks like a large plurality, if not most, Rotherhamite Paki men were involved.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Barnard
    They gave up their right to own firearms 20 years ago and the government won't do anything. What are their options?

    It is very easy to manufacture “good enough” firearms and explosives. And, as cloudbuster mentions, knives and clubs work great. Gun control is not the problem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Thea
    I don't understand how it got to this point where they don't stop the rape of their women.

    Is it TV? It had to start way before smart phones. British inner city youth were to be feared at one time.

    These people gave the world punk rock and now they care about hurting others feelings?

    Low birthrate means few yobs to fear.

    Then there was the exemplary justice: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Notting_Hill_race_riots

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @whorefinder
    The BBC covered up Jimmy Saville's rape-and-molestation fest for 30+ years. We should not think that such sex gangs are merely for Muslim men; instead, they are feeders for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions.

    In other words, the BBC and Muslim rape gangs are not unconnected.

    The BBC covered up Jimmy Saville’s rape-and-molestation fest for 30+ years. We should not think that such sex gangs are merely for Muslim men; instead, they are feeders for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions.

    In other words, the BBC and Muslim rape gangs are not unconnected.

    How are they connected? Do you know any reports of Muslims procuring women or children for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions?

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    That's not an example of a structural connection, but it is a connection for investigative purposes (how many more pedophiles will the BBC cover for before people stop caring exactly what the exact connection is?), and one Muslim on trial has said that his customers for groomed runaways were not his neighbors but high politicians (he could be crazy, he could be lying to sound important or strike a deal, or he could be talking about high level programmatic child abuse at the same time that the UK franchise of 60 Minutes has aired stories about non-Muslim child rape rings now seeing their day in court).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    "The people of Rotherham have been subjected to vile verbal abuse on streets, in schools and in the town centre. Bomb threats to mosques; 14 far-right demonstrations within a year radicalising a local community; innocent taxi drivers forced into intensive care units; the murder of an 81-year-old grandfather who was walking to the mosque; and the wrongful arrest of these 12 men."

    I suspect this is a bunch of bs. But if it is true, I call it a good start and hope it continues.

    >”The people of Rotherham”
    >proceeds to apparently describe Muslims [in Rotherham?] claiming Islamophobia, because they never lie about that
    No matter how many children get abused, the real victims and the focus of mass media attention must always be military age Muslim men.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. The figure of 110 perpetrators is realistic, and may even be an underestimate. A study of a different case estimated one abuser for every 10 victims.

    There is good news and bad news.

    The good news is that more than 90% of Muslim men from Rotherham were not child rapists. Guardian journalists and other well-meaning people will seize on this fact as proof that we have nothing to fear from Muslim immigration, and another doubling of Britain’s Muslim population will be at least 90% a Good Thing.

    The bad news is that a few percent of Muslim men from Rotherham are child rapists. That is a staggering figure, possibly a hundred times higher than the figure for Rotherham’s infidel (kaffir) men.

    To sustain a civilised society, it is not sufficient for the “majority” of the population (50% + 1) to avoid committing serious crime; or even for the “vast majority” (say 90%) to avoid doing so. It is necessary for almost everyone not to commit serious crime.

    If asked to name the most serious crime, Guardian journalists would probably choose hate crime. The number of Muslims in Britain who have killed for religious/ethnic/tribal/political reasons (i.e. hate crime) exceeds the number of such infidels by a considerable margin – yet Muslims form only 5% of the British population. The rate of offending per 100,000 population is, as for child sex abuse, on the order of 100 times higher for Muslims than for infidels.

    The citizens of countries like Hungary, who have not had five decades immersed in goodspeak, can see clearly what our own politicians cannot – and they do not want to repeat our mistakes.

    The problem of serious crime committed by Muslims in Western Europe is containable, but only if we end mass immigration from Muslim countries. This will require legislation in each country, to provide derogations from the European Convention on Human Rights (and its equivalent in local legislation). It will need the resolve to refuse immigration for purposes of family reunion, marriage, and other forms of chain migration.

    While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle.

    Read More
    • Replies: @3g4me
    @41 James N Kennett: "While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle."

    It's neither a paradox nor a complex issue. Pakistani Mohammedans=/English Christians. Different race, different religion, different history, different culture. You could stop all further immigration tomorrow and you would not begin to solve the problem. The purported fact that some "majority" of these Mohammedans are not rapists is irrelevant. Even ONE is one too many. You are obviously one of the "human race" blind fools who believes that with time and education these profoundly alien people will accept different values, exhibit different behavior, and become good loyal Englishmen. Not gonna happen in a million years.

    But go ahead and intermarry; I'm sure that will work out really well for your family.
    Masochistic cuck.
    , @jbwilson24
    "we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people."

    A load of nonsense.

    One of the police officers interviewed for the Jay report stated that half the Paki men in Rotherham were involved.

    In no other case of gang rapes are there women actively covering up the rape of children. The men would make the girls call the wives on the telephone. The women knew what was going on and did nothing.

    These are not 'decent people'. They are third world savages ripe for a purging.
    , @Anonym
    While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle.

    Not necessarily decent people. The religion they subscribe to still instructs them to terrorize/kill kaffir. The French were ethnically cleansed from Algeria for less.
    , @notanon

    A study of a different case estimated one abuser for every 10 victims.
     

    The good news is that more than 90% of Muslim men from Rotherham were not child rapists.
     
    The grooming gangs pimp the girls out to hundreds of men - so a ratio of 1:10 of groomers to girls is reasonable but the ratio of customers to girls is at least 10:1.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @James N. Kennett

    The BBC covered up Jimmy Saville’s rape-and-molestation fest for 30+ years. We should not think that such sex gangs are merely for Muslim men; instead, they are feeders for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions.

    In other words, the BBC and Muslim rape gangs are not unconnected.
     
    How are they connected? Do you know any reports of Muslims procuring women or children for non-Muslim British pedophiles in higher positions?

    That’s not an example of a structural connection, but it is a connection for investigative purposes (how many more pedophiles will the BBC cover for before people stop caring exactly what the exact connection is?), and one Muslim on trial has said that his customers for groomed runaways were not his neighbors but high politicians (he could be crazy, he could be lying to sound important or strike a deal, or he could be talking about high level programmatic child abuse at the same time that the UK franchise of 60 Minutes has aired stories about non-Muslim child rape rings now seeing their day in court).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    The term "pedophilia" gives the wrong angle on Rotherham and the other grooming gangs. Most of these girls were post-pubescent but underage, so it's just regular heterosexual statutory rape and sometimes rape rape.

    http://takimag.com/article/the_real_threat_to_british_elites_steve_sailer/print#axzz57dvyh8BX

    , @notanon

    and one Muslim on trial has said that his customers for groomed runaways were not his neighbors but high politicians
     
    a lot of the people who run the gangs are local businessmen who are also (or have been) local (Muslim) politicians (this is how they get the contracts to provide taxis for girls in group homes)

    so he's right but his definition of "high politicians" may be different to what people imagine - they are high locally rather than nationally.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. @Lex
    Part of the reason why white girls are targeted:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Birmingham_riots

    The Birmingham riots of 2005 occurred on two consecutive nights on Saturday 22 October and Sunday 23 October 2005 in the Lozells and Handsworth area of Birmingham, England. The riots were derived from ethnic tensions between the Caribbean and British Asian communities, with the spark for the riot being an alleged gang rape of a teenage black girl by a group of South Asian men.
     
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/how-muslims-are-kept-mostly-peaceful-in-india/

    This. We are going to have to be like them, at least develop a capacity to think like them. We must remember how to think tribally. Imagine any outsider deliberately entering a Sicilian neighborhood in New Jersey in the mid-sixties, expressly to hit on teenage girls. That’s what we need.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @J.Ross
    That's not an example of a structural connection, but it is a connection for investigative purposes (how many more pedophiles will the BBC cover for before people stop caring exactly what the exact connection is?), and one Muslim on trial has said that his customers for groomed runaways were not his neighbors but high politicians (he could be crazy, he could be lying to sound important or strike a deal, or he could be talking about high level programmatic child abuse at the same time that the UK franchise of 60 Minutes has aired stories about non-Muslim child rape rings now seeing their day in court).

    The term “pedophilia” gives the wrong angle on Rotherham and the other grooming gangs. Most of these girls were post-pubescent but underage, so it’s just regular heterosexual statutory rape and sometimes rape rape.

    http://takimag.com/article/the_real_threat_to_british_elites_steve_sailer/print#axzz57dvyh8BX

    Read More
    • Replies: @Whiskey
    Steve, how many were age 11 or thereabouts. Its my understanding that Muslims like em young, like around age nine or so. In emulation of Mohammed who took as his wife Aisha at age nine when she was still playing with toys.

    It is worth noting that Muslims consider Mohammed a perfect man in all respects.

    What we are seeing in British/English men not fighting back is the reality of POWER.

    Muslims have it all, in every Western country, save Israel, Hungary, Switzerland, Poland, and Russia because of .... what?

    The Nazi Larpers say "Joooooosssssssss!!!!!! What was the question" as if turning Paris into a Muslim sewer is good for Jews and particularly Rothschilds. The more accurate commonality is that the Western Nations that don't let Muslims walk all over them have a relatively poor position of women. None of those nations are keen on letting their women hold up signs saying "Rapefugees Welcome."

    When Sarah Silverman's sister tried that stuff in Israel she got flyers directing Africans straight to her mansion. Implying she'd put them up and invite them in. Israel is constantly fighting wars that a significant measure of their male population is involved in and has the draft and not much of a consumer market. The same is true for Switzerland given its fractured canton government and patchwork of blue / Sunday laws and of the post-Communist East.

    Theory: Decade upon Decade of mass female-driven consumerism has driven the decisive power to Women instead of men and in response they are acting like all women do -- going with whatever man swaggers around the most. Muslims, Blacks, no matter what the group as long as the natural IQ is low and the probability of stupid senseless violence is high that's catnip to women. [Yes, NAWALT. But enough are to shape the currents of POWER.]

    A female dominated society will PUNISH its own men for acting to protect their own women from colonizers and aggressive immavaders. A White English man acting to protect his daughter would be sent to prison and likely stabbed to death by Muslim inmates inside a week. With his daughter being prostituted anyway as his baby momma (they won't be married) makes excuses for Ahmed or Jamal.

    Women and men will always reach for decisive power over the other as women and men's goals on average are not only divergent but mutually exclusive. Today's Western society is a female paradise or as close to it as women get, and a (White) male hell. The 1950s were a White male paradise and a female hell (just ask any feminist, they'll tell you).

    If White men ran England (it would not only be awesome) but nearly every Muslim or African would be booted out. Instead you get Rapefugees Welcome and another Warlock Hunt over some charity event with older White men acting boorishly.
    , @eah
    just

    Yeah, "just" statutory rape -- on a mass scale -- that went on for well more than a decade.

    As the 'Jay Report' makes clear, there's a lot more to what went on -- what was allowed to go on -- in Rotherham than "just" statutory rape.
    , @J.Ross
    And the urine and the beatings and the completely undiscussed tribal angle, these girls being "fair game" because of their identity -- none of that is really covered by any terms.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Charles Pewitt
    Nigel Farage on Muslim Rape Gangs in Rotherham

    Nigel Farage:

    "The reason that the blind eye was turned is because race was an issue. Had these offenders been from a different race, I suspect more would have been done earlier. That is not an extraordinary thing to say, that is pretty much an accepted fact."

    https://twitter.com/CharlesPewitt/status/564828141580189696

    “The reason that the blind eye was turned is because race was an issue. Had these offenders been from a different race, I suspect more would have been done earlier. That is not an extraordinary thing to say, that is pretty much an accepted fact.”

    Indeed, it’s even mentioned in the executive summary of the Jay Report (PDF):

    By far the majority of perpetrators were described as ‘Asian’ by victims, yet throughout the entire period, councillors did not engage directly with the Pakistani-heritage community to discuss how best they could jointly address the issue. Some councillors seemed to think it was a one-off problem, which they hoped would go away. Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. England is dead man walking, unless it repents of its bloody history as the greatest exponent of the Reformation and its corresponding desire to replace Christendom and its furious animus to despise almost every other European people.

    What we are seeing across the secularized West, which is the bastard child of Christendom ruined, is akin to what the junkie faces: either you repent, fully, going 180 degrees away from what got you here, or you die.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  48. @James N. Kennett
    The figure of 110 perpetrators is realistic, and may even be an underestimate. A study of a different case estimated one abuser for every 10 victims.

    There is good news and bad news.

    The good news is that more than 90% of Muslim men from Rotherham were not child rapists. Guardian journalists and other well-meaning people will seize on this fact as proof that we have nothing to fear from Muslim immigration, and another doubling of Britain's Muslim population will be at least 90% a Good Thing.

    The bad news is that a few percent of Muslim men from Rotherham are child rapists. That is a staggering figure, possibly a hundred times higher than the figure for Rotherham's infidel (kaffir) men.

    To sustain a civilised society, it is not sufficient for the "majority" of the population (50% + 1) to avoid committing serious crime; or even for the "vast majority" (say 90%) to avoid doing so. It is necessary for almost everyone not to commit serious crime.

    If asked to name the most serious crime, Guardian journalists would probably choose hate crime. The number of Muslims in Britain who have killed for religious/ethnic/tribal/political reasons (i.e. hate crime) exceeds the number of such infidels by a considerable margin - yet Muslims form only 5% of the British population. The rate of offending per 100,000 population is, as for child sex abuse, on the order of 100 times higher for Muslims than for infidels.

    The citizens of countries like Hungary, who have not had five decades immersed in goodspeak, can see clearly what our own politicians cannot - and they do not want to repeat our mistakes.

    The problem of serious crime committed by Muslims in Western Europe is containable, but only if we end mass immigration from Muslim countries. This will require legislation in each country, to provide derogations from the European Convention on Human Rights (and its equivalent in local legislation). It will need the resolve to refuse immigration for purposes of family reunion, marriage, and other forms of chain migration.

    While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle.

    @41 James N Kennett: “While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle.”

    It’s neither a paradox nor a complex issue. Pakistani Mohammedans=/English Christians. Different race, different religion, different history, different culture. You could stop all further immigration tomorrow and you would not begin to solve the problem. The purported fact that some “majority” of these Mohammedans are not rapists is irrelevant. Even ONE is one too many. You are obviously one of the “human race” blind fools who believes that with time and education these profoundly alien people will accept different values, exhibit different behavior, and become good loyal Englishmen. Not gonna happen in a million years.

    But go ahead and intermarry; I’m sure that will work out really well for your family.
    Masochistic cuck.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. @James N. Kennett
    The figure of 110 perpetrators is realistic, and may even be an underestimate. A study of a different case estimated one abuser for every 10 victims.

    There is good news and bad news.

    The good news is that more than 90% of Muslim men from Rotherham were not child rapists. Guardian journalists and other well-meaning people will seize on this fact as proof that we have nothing to fear from Muslim immigration, and another doubling of Britain's Muslim population will be at least 90% a Good Thing.

    The bad news is that a few percent of Muslim men from Rotherham are child rapists. That is a staggering figure, possibly a hundred times higher than the figure for Rotherham's infidel (kaffir) men.

    To sustain a civilised society, it is not sufficient for the "majority" of the population (50% + 1) to avoid committing serious crime; or even for the "vast majority" (say 90%) to avoid doing so. It is necessary for almost everyone not to commit serious crime.

    If asked to name the most serious crime, Guardian journalists would probably choose hate crime. The number of Muslims in Britain who have killed for religious/ethnic/tribal/political reasons (i.e. hate crime) exceeds the number of such infidels by a considerable margin - yet Muslims form only 5% of the British population. The rate of offending per 100,000 population is, as for child sex abuse, on the order of 100 times higher for Muslims than for infidels.

    The citizens of countries like Hungary, who have not had five decades immersed in goodspeak, can see clearly what our own politicians cannot - and they do not want to repeat our mistakes.

    The problem of serious crime committed by Muslims in Western Europe is containable, but only if we end mass immigration from Muslim countries. This will require legislation in each country, to provide derogations from the European Convention on Human Rights (and its equivalent in local legislation). It will need the resolve to refuse immigration for purposes of family reunion, marriage, and other forms of chain migration.

    While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle.

    “we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people.”

    A load of nonsense.

    One of the police officers interviewed for the Jay report stated that half the Paki men in Rotherham were involved.

    In no other case of gang rapes are there women actively covering up the rape of children. The men would make the girls call the wives on the telephone. The women knew what was going on and did nothing.

    These are not ‘decent people’. They are third world savages ripe for a purging.

    Read More
    • Agree: Anonym
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    One of the police officers interviewed for the Jay report stated that half the Paki men in Rotherham were involved.
     
    This is just an expression that English speakers use. "Half the country owns a pit bull terrier." It is not a serious attempt to quantify the problem.

    Just as it is important not to underestimate the problem, it is also unhelpful to overestimate it.

    In no other case of gang rapes are there women actively covering up the rape of children. The men would make the girls call the wives on the telephone. The women knew what was going on and did nothing.
     
    Again, if a few percent of men were perpetrators, a few percent of women were in collusion. A larger number knew what was happening and did nothing. Or perhaps they did report the offences to police and social services, who did nothing.

    If there is anything in common with the case of Jimmy Savile, it is that when complaints were made, nothing was done. Savile talked himself out of seven police investigations, chiefly by pointing out that if he were arrested and charged, charitable donations to Stoke Mandeville hospital and other good causes would cease. The Muslim child rapists of Rotherham found that, at best, the responsible authorities valued "community cohesion" over the lives of 1,400 white girls; at worst, they were terrified of losing their livelihoods through accusations of racism.
    , @Thea
    Judging by comments made to the media by the paki women, they believe white girls deserved it and lured the men in.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. @James N. Kennett
    The figure of 110 perpetrators is realistic, and may even be an underestimate. A study of a different case estimated one abuser for every 10 victims.

    There is good news and bad news.

    The good news is that more than 90% of Muslim men from Rotherham were not child rapists. Guardian journalists and other well-meaning people will seize on this fact as proof that we have nothing to fear from Muslim immigration, and another doubling of Britain's Muslim population will be at least 90% a Good Thing.

    The bad news is that a few percent of Muslim men from Rotherham are child rapists. That is a staggering figure, possibly a hundred times higher than the figure for Rotherham's infidel (kaffir) men.

    To sustain a civilised society, it is not sufficient for the "majority" of the population (50% + 1) to avoid committing serious crime; or even for the "vast majority" (say 90%) to avoid doing so. It is necessary for almost everyone not to commit serious crime.

    If asked to name the most serious crime, Guardian journalists would probably choose hate crime. The number of Muslims in Britain who have killed for religious/ethnic/tribal/political reasons (i.e. hate crime) exceeds the number of such infidels by a considerable margin - yet Muslims form only 5% of the British population. The rate of offending per 100,000 population is, as for child sex abuse, on the order of 100 times higher for Muslims than for infidels.

    The citizens of countries like Hungary, who have not had five decades immersed in goodspeak, can see clearly what our own politicians cannot - and they do not want to repeat our mistakes.

    The problem of serious crime committed by Muslims in Western Europe is containable, but only if we end mass immigration from Muslim countries. This will require legislation in each country, to provide derogations from the European Convention on Human Rights (and its equivalent in local legislation). It will need the resolve to refuse immigration for purposes of family reunion, marriage, and other forms of chain migration.

    While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle.

    While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle.

    Not necessarily decent people. The religion they subscribe to still instructs them to terrorize/kill kaffir. The French were ethnically cleansed from Algeria for less.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @James N. Kennett
    The figure of 110 perpetrators is realistic, and may even be an underestimate. A study of a different case estimated one abuser for every 10 victims.

    There is good news and bad news.

    The good news is that more than 90% of Muslim men from Rotherham were not child rapists. Guardian journalists and other well-meaning people will seize on this fact as proof that we have nothing to fear from Muslim immigration, and another doubling of Britain's Muslim population will be at least 90% a Good Thing.

    The bad news is that a few percent of Muslim men from Rotherham are child rapists. That is a staggering figure, possibly a hundred times higher than the figure for Rotherham's infidel (kaffir) men.

    To sustain a civilised society, it is not sufficient for the "majority" of the population (50% + 1) to avoid committing serious crime; or even for the "vast majority" (say 90%) to avoid doing so. It is necessary for almost everyone not to commit serious crime.

    If asked to name the most serious crime, Guardian journalists would probably choose hate crime. The number of Muslims in Britain who have killed for religious/ethnic/tribal/political reasons (i.e. hate crime) exceeds the number of such infidels by a considerable margin - yet Muslims form only 5% of the British population. The rate of offending per 100,000 population is, as for child sex abuse, on the order of 100 times higher for Muslims than for infidels.

    The citizens of countries like Hungary, who have not had five decades immersed in goodspeak, can see clearly what our own politicians cannot - and they do not want to repeat our mistakes.

    The problem of serious crime committed by Muslims in Western Europe is containable, but only if we end mass immigration from Muslim countries. This will require legislation in each country, to provide derogations from the European Convention on Human Rights (and its equivalent in local legislation). It will need the resolve to refuse immigration for purposes of family reunion, marriage, and other forms of chain migration.

    While doing this, we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people. The paradox seems to be too much for many people to handle.

    A study of a different case estimated one abuser for every 10 victims.

    The good news is that more than 90% of Muslim men from Rotherham were not child rapists.

    The grooming gangs pimp the girls out to hundreds of men – so a ratio of 1:10 of groomers to girls is reasonable but the ratio of customers to girls is at least 10:1.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    The grooming gangs pimp the girls out to hundreds of men – so a ratio of 1:10 of groomers to girls is reasonable but the ratio of customers to girls is at least 10:1.
     
    I don't believe it. If there are a hundred times more "customers" than "groomers", you end up with many more "customers" than there are Muslim men in Rotherham.

    It is true that the girls were taken to other towns to be abused by other men. However, this was a two-way street: those men also groomed and abused local girls and took them to Rotherham. The ratio of abusers to victims remains the same.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. @J.Ross
    That's not an example of a structural connection, but it is a connection for investigative purposes (how many more pedophiles will the BBC cover for before people stop caring exactly what the exact connection is?), and one Muslim on trial has said that his customers for groomed runaways were not his neighbors but high politicians (he could be crazy, he could be lying to sound important or strike a deal, or he could be talking about high level programmatic child abuse at the same time that the UK franchise of 60 Minutes has aired stories about non-Muslim child rape rings now seeing their day in court).

    and one Muslim on trial has said that his customers for groomed runaways were not his neighbors but high politicians

    a lot of the people who run the gangs are local businessmen who are also (or have been) local (Muslim) politicians (this is how they get the contracts to provide taxis for girls in group homes)

    so he’s right but his definition of “high politicians” may be different to what people imagine – they are high locally rather than nationally.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. @Steve Sailer
    The term "pedophilia" gives the wrong angle on Rotherham and the other grooming gangs. Most of these girls were post-pubescent but underage, so it's just regular heterosexual statutory rape and sometimes rape rape.

    http://takimag.com/article/the_real_threat_to_british_elites_steve_sailer/print#axzz57dvyh8BX

    Steve, how many were age 11 or thereabouts. Its my understanding that Muslims like em young, like around age nine or so. In emulation of Mohammed who took as his wife Aisha at age nine when she was still playing with toys.

    It is worth noting that Muslims consider Mohammed a perfect man in all respects.

    What we are seeing in British/English men not fighting back is the reality of POWER.

    Muslims have it all, in every Western country, save Israel, Hungary, Switzerland, Poland, and Russia because of …. what?

    The Nazi Larpers say “Joooooosssssssss!!!!!! What was the question” as if turning Paris into a Muslim sewer is good for Jews and particularly Rothschilds. The more accurate commonality is that the Western Nations that don’t let Muslims walk all over them have a relatively poor position of women. None of those nations are keen on letting their women hold up signs saying “Rapefugees Welcome.”

    When Sarah Silverman’s sister tried that stuff in Israel she got flyers directing Africans straight to her mansion. Implying she’d put them up and invite them in. Israel is constantly fighting wars that a significant measure of their male population is involved in and has the draft and not much of a consumer market. The same is true for Switzerland given its fractured canton government and patchwork of blue / Sunday laws and of the post-Communist East.

    Theory: Decade upon Decade of mass female-driven consumerism has driven the decisive power to Women instead of men and in response they are acting like all women do — going with whatever man swaggers around the most. Muslims, Blacks, no matter what the group as long as the natural IQ is low and the probability of stupid senseless violence is high that’s catnip to women. [Yes, NAWALT. But enough are to shape the currents of POWER.]

    A female dominated society will PUNISH its own men for acting to protect their own women from colonizers and aggressive immavaders. A White English man acting to protect his daughter would be sent to prison and likely stabbed to death by Muslim inmates inside a week. With his daughter being prostituted anyway as his baby momma (they won’t be married) makes excuses for Ahmed or Jamal.

    Women and men will always reach for decisive power over the other as women and men’s goals on average are not only divergent but mutually exclusive. Today’s Western society is a female paradise or as close to it as women get, and a (White) male hell. The 1950s were a White male paradise and a female hell (just ask any feminist, they’ll tell you).

    If White men ran England (it would not only be awesome) but nearly every Muslim or African would be booted out. Instead you get Rapefugees Welcome and another Warlock Hunt over some charity event with older White men acting boorishly.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn’t just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I’m sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface. I wouldn’t lay the main blame on multiculturalism’s doorstep just yet.

    Let’s not lose focus of the real threat to women (white male christians) just because a few Men of Color take advantage of libertine western seductresses

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn’t just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I’m sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface.

    I think you are right. As far as I remember the social workers in the town felt that these somewhat delinquent girls were making a deliberate, albeit poor, decision to live as prostitutes and "Paki-lovers" in this socially deprived town which was once at the epicenter of the now defunct South Yorkshire coalfield and steel industries, and did not perceive the situation as one of child rape and pedophilia, which has since become the dominant perspective.

    If the Pakistani whoremasters or whatever you call them had been arrested or investigated at an earlier point, most likely the underage women would have defended them, rather than cooperating with the police investigation.

    I don't understand the revision from 1400 to 1510, because the 14oo was only a rough estimate in the first place and the Jay Report did not have 1400 named victims. An additional 110 girls over 16 years does not seem very significant.
    , @James N. Kennett

    I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn’t just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I’m sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface. I wouldn’t lay the main blame on multiculturalism’s doorstep just yet.
     
    Don't forget that the Macpherson Report (1999) into the murder of Stephen Lawrence declared that the Metropolitan Police were "institutionally racist". This verdict inhibited law enforcement against minorities for years afterwards.

    The notion of "institutional racism" was pure virtue signalling, of course: the problems with the Lawrence investigation arose from straightforward police corruption, which has still not been properly investigated.

    There are two ways to deal with a complaint against a person from a minority, without being accused of racism:
    (a) Use your brain. Look at the evidence in front of you. Forget the person's race, except when asking "would I be treating a white person the same way?"
    (b) Treat the complaint as motivated by racism. Ignore it, as if the accused is a noble savage who cannot possibly have the same vices as other people.

    You can start out following strategy (a), but if your manager or superior officer is following strategy (b) you will quickly find that you have made a career-limiting move. In fact, for strategy (a) to work it must be followed by your entire reporting chain, right up to elected politicians. So in fact there are not two ways to avoid career-limiting accusations of racism - there is only one.

    I think this is the atmosphere that prevailed after Macpherson, and it may be sufficient to explain why officialdom turned a blind eye to the Muslim gangs. However, some episodes are so extreme that they seem hard to explain without either police corruption or the extreme ineptitude that is not unknown in the Yorkshire constabularies.

    In a particularly extreme case, police were called because a man was banging on a Muslim's door. The first man's 15-year-old daughter was inside the house. The police arrived, searched the house, and found the girl, drunk, hiding under a bed. They arrested her for assault, and arrested her father for racial abuse. Then they left three Muslim men in the house with the other white girls that they had groomed.

    , @Tex

    Let’s not lose focus of the real threat to women (white male christians) just because a few Men of Color take advantage of libertine western seductresses
     
    I was getting a little worried about you while reading that first paragraph. But the last part pulled out the dive in classic form.

    Thank you emotional comfort duck!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @Cloudbuster
    That's the typical behavior of conquering warriors.

    conquering warriors

    How would you describe the behavior of the Brits who looked the other way/allowed it to go on?

    Read More
    • Agree: Cloudbuster
    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    Conquered.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. @Steve Sailer
    The term "pedophilia" gives the wrong angle on Rotherham and the other grooming gangs. Most of these girls were post-pubescent but underage, so it's just regular heterosexual statutory rape and sometimes rape rape.

    http://takimag.com/article/the_real_threat_to_british_elites_steve_sailer/print#axzz57dvyh8BX

    just

    Yeah, “just” statutory rape — on a mass scale — that went on for well more than a decade.

    As the ‘Jay Report’ makes clear, there’s a lot more to what went on — what was allowed to go on — in Rotherham than “just” statutory rape.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    They don't see color. What is a "Pakistani" but a label, a social construct. There are white pimps too. Everybody is the same - except when the differences are good.

    All of this garbage has been swallowed hook, line and sinker by whites in Western Europe and North America. We have no ability to even think as a people anymore, to think at all.

    But it can't last because other groups don't buy any of it. The Muslims sure as hell don't. Somebody disses Mohammed and they get a bullet to the brain. Some gays parade a Muslim neighborhood and they get an ass kicking. Some feminists protest for women's rights in front of a mosque and their cars get smashed up. Some school director prevents Muslim kids from praying all day or demanding a different cirriculum and she'll notice men trailing her at night and maybe threatening her.

    White men may have lost their masculinity and religion, but other men haven't. They will fight for their people and their beliefs. Even if they're not very good at it, they still win because we don't even show up.

    Especially for Europe, I find it hard to believe that 50 or 100 years from now one of two things didn't happen. Either whites found their identity again and fought back or Muslims and Africans basically took over and white just blended in. But what has little chance of surviving is this feminized "We are the World"/Diversity Uber Alles culture. It's just too vulnerable, too easy to game and take over.

    “I don’t know what a “social construct” is but I can recognize it when I meet it in the street”

    What is a “Pakistani” but a label, a social construct.

    Yet another one from the “everything is unreal and also fluid and therefore exchangeable” dazed & confused postmodern sloganbox.

    Everybody is the same – except when the differences are good.

    We have arrived at the “everything sucks” final step of argumentation?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @Tiny Duck
    I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn't just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I'm sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface. I wouldn't lay the main blame on multiculturalism's doorstep just yet.

    Let's not lose focus of the real threat to women (white male christians) just because a few Men of Color take advantage of libertine western seductresses

    I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn’t just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I’m sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface.

    I think you are right. As far as I remember the social workers in the town felt that these somewhat delinquent girls were making a deliberate, albeit poor, decision to live as prostitutes and “Paki-lovers” in this socially deprived town which was once at the epicenter of the now defunct South Yorkshire coalfield and steel industries, and did not perceive the situation as one of child rape and pedophilia, which has since become the dominant perspective.

    If the Pakistani whoremasters or whatever you call them had been arrested or investigated at an earlier point, most likely the underage women would have defended them, rather than cooperating with the police investigation.

    I don’t understand the revision from 1400 to 1510, because the 14oo was only a rough estimate in the first place and the Jay Report did not have 1400 named victims. An additional 110 girls over 16 years does not seem very significant.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Knowing the way Pakistanis operate, palms were likely greased somewhere along the line.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @eah
    conquering warriors

    How would you describe the behavior of the Brits who looked the other way/allowed it to go on?

    Conquered.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    A real dilemma for the Left.

    Two of their pets high up the Totem Pole – women and brown muzzies – are at each other’s throats. In more ways than one, I might add.
    The usual Left tactic is to blame white men – with the usual bullshit, convoluted tissue of lies and sophistry.
    Proving difficult here, but somehow, someway, it will be done.
    Expect the names John Worboys, Jimmy Savile and Barry Bunnell to be aired incessantly.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  61. @Jonathan Mason
    I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn’t just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I’m sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface.

    I think you are right. As far as I remember the social workers in the town felt that these somewhat delinquent girls were making a deliberate, albeit poor, decision to live as prostitutes and "Paki-lovers" in this socially deprived town which was once at the epicenter of the now defunct South Yorkshire coalfield and steel industries, and did not perceive the situation as one of child rape and pedophilia, which has since become the dominant perspective.

    If the Pakistani whoremasters or whatever you call them had been arrested or investigated at an earlier point, most likely the underage women would have defended them, rather than cooperating with the police investigation.

    I don't understand the revision from 1400 to 1510, because the 14oo was only a rough estimate in the first place and the Jay Report did not have 1400 named victims. An additional 110 girls over 16 years does not seem very significant.

    Knowing the way Pakistanis operate, palms were likely greased somewhere along the line.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. @Clement Pulaski
    Any breakdown of the population of Rotherham by age, gender and race?
    It seems like that many victims would actually be a sizeable proportion of the the white teenaged female population of the city.

    Per Wikipedia, there are a bit above 100k people in Rotherham USD, of which about 86% (and falling) were white British, and 8.6% (and rising) were “Asian”.

    So 90k white British Rotherhamites ÷ 2 = 45k females ≈ 5000 11-18 year old girls = about one in three or four were raped!

    So the first time that the old feminist canard about 1 in 4 women being raped actually turns out to be documentarily true, they suddenly don’t want to talk about it. This is dispositive evidence that feminism has nothing to do with femininity per se, but is just the distaff flavor of civilization wrecking.

    P.S. 9000 Asians ÷ 2 = 4500 Asian males ≈ 2500 post-pubescent/pre-impotent Asian Rotherhamite men. If the victims were pimped to “hundreds” … 1500 × 100s = 150,000s. Undoubtedly many were repeat customers, and a few may have commuted from outside Rotherham (but why bother when every town seems to have this?), but 150000/2500 = at least 60 rapes per sexually active Rotherhamite Asian male sure looks like a large plurality, if not most, Rotherhamite Paki men were involved.

    Read More
    • Replies: @notanon

    So 90k white British Rotherhamites ÷ 2 = 45k females ≈ 5000 11-18 year old girls = about one in three or four were raped!
     
    the girls are groomed around age 11-13 and rebel around 15-16 so the total number over 20 years involves maybe 200-400 girls at a time

    there's also a thing been happening all over the West since the most extreme kind of SJWs came to dominate child services which is they have become very aggressive about taking children away from parents they feel are unsuitable (which includes parents who are too Christian) and putting them into group homes a long away from their home town.

    (there's a secondary aspect to this of snatching children for the lucrative adoption market as a lot of the adoption agencies are run by ex child services people)

    so the victims from group homes could have come from the whole county or beyond and not just Rotherham itself.

    #


    sure looks like a large plurality, if not most, Rotherhamite Paki men were involved.
     
    the aspect of this which has been completely hidden so far is this is mostly not about pedophilia it's industrial scale child prostitution and the majority of customers are the millions of illegal immigrants who send most of their money home and thus have very little spending money - and the grooming gangs are often paid by the employers of the illegals.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. When the Labour MP Ann Cryer was campaigning against this in the 1990s, she naturally turned to the leftwingers who are passionately committed to rescuing Britain’s most vulnerable wimmin and girls from toxic patriarchal culture:

    How I was branded a racist – for trying to save girls from their vile abusers: Former MP ANN CRYER on the accusations she has faced after daring to say these are culturally-routed crimes

    Support was not forthcoming from all quarters. I couldn’t get The Guardian interested. Its reporters seemed paralysed by political correctness. When I wasn’t being openly accused of racism and religious hate — my name was on the website Islamophobia Watch — I was painted as someone who didn’t understand Asian culture. The former London mayor Ken Livingstone certainly thought so.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4780326/Branded-racist-trying-save-girls-vile-abusers.html

    And let’s not forget Denis MacShane, the passionately feminist Labour MP who served Rotherham for eighteen years. He was too busy fighting antisemitism and fascism on behalf of Britain’s tiny Jewish community to notice what was happening in his constituency. Sarah Champion, who replaced Denis as Rotherham’s MP after he was jailed for fraud, had to resign from Labour’s shadow cabinet when she suggested that Pakistani males have a tendency towards this kind of thing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. @Barnard
    They gave up their right to own firearms 20 years ago and the government won't do anything. What are their options?

    My neighbour here in London has a shotgun, all you need to do is get a license:

    http://www.shootinguk.co.uk/shooting/start-shooting/how-to-get-shotgun-certificate-licence-32358

    Read More
    • Replies: @stillCARealist
    Yikes, who would bother to go through all that? An illegal weapon would be far easier and cheaper to acquire I would think.

    All Americans should read through that list of intrusive and bureaucratic steps involved in just getting permission to own a shotgun. Then you have to get the dang license renewed in 5 years.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. @jbwilson24
    "we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people."

    A load of nonsense.

    One of the police officers interviewed for the Jay report stated that half the Paki men in Rotherham were involved.

    In no other case of gang rapes are there women actively covering up the rape of children. The men would make the girls call the wives on the telephone. The women knew what was going on and did nothing.

    These are not 'decent people'. They are third world savages ripe for a purging.

    One of the police officers interviewed for the Jay report stated that half the Paki men in Rotherham were involved.

    This is just an expression that English speakers use. “Half the country owns a pit bull terrier.” It is not a serious attempt to quantify the problem.

    Just as it is important not to underestimate the problem, it is also unhelpful to overestimate it.

    In no other case of gang rapes are there women actively covering up the rape of children. The men would make the girls call the wives on the telephone. The women knew what was going on and did nothing.

    Again, if a few percent of men were perpetrators, a few percent of women were in collusion. A larger number knew what was happening and did nothing. Or perhaps they did report the offences to police and social services, who did nothing.

    If there is anything in common with the case of Jimmy Savile, it is that when complaints were made, nothing was done. Savile talked himself out of seven police investigations, chiefly by pointing out that if he were arrested and charged, charitable donations to Stoke Mandeville hospital and other good causes would cease. The Muslim child rapists of Rotherham found that, at best, the responsible authorities valued “community cohesion” over the lives of 1,400 white girls; at worst, they were terrified of losing their livelihoods through accusations of racism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @notanon

    A study of a different case estimated one abuser for every 10 victims.
     

    The good news is that more than 90% of Muslim men from Rotherham were not child rapists.
     
    The grooming gangs pimp the girls out to hundreds of men - so a ratio of 1:10 of groomers to girls is reasonable but the ratio of customers to girls is at least 10:1.

    The grooming gangs pimp the girls out to hundreds of men – so a ratio of 1:10 of groomers to girls is reasonable but the ratio of customers to girls is at least 10:1.

    I don’t believe it. If there are a hundred times more “customers” than “groomers”, you end up with many more “customers” than there are Muslim men in Rotherham.

    It is true that the girls were taken to other towns to be abused by other men. However, this was a two-way street: those men also groomed and abused local girls and took them to Rotherham. The ratio of abusers to victims remains the same.

    Read More
    • Replies: @notanon

    I don’t believe it. If there are a hundred times more “customers” than “groomers”, you end up with many more “customers” than there are Muslim men in Rotherham.
     
    nope

    there are millions of illegal immigrants working in minority-owned businesses who are paid very little and sending most of it back home.

    this is the big lie aspect of all this - it's not primarily pedophilia it's industrial scale forced child prostitution cos children are easier to hold down.

    it's happening on a similar scale with mexican children being trafficked into the US to service illegals in the US (or Nigerian children trafficked by Nigerian gangs to service Nigerian illegals etc). the big difference with Muslims is their culture is so ****ed up they have to lock their children away to be safe so they have to get the girls from the native population.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Tiny Duck
    I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn't just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I'm sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface. I wouldn't lay the main blame on multiculturalism's doorstep just yet.

    Let's not lose focus of the real threat to women (white male christians) just because a few Men of Color take advantage of libertine western seductresses

    I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn’t just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I’m sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface. I wouldn’t lay the main blame on multiculturalism’s doorstep just yet.

    Don’t forget that the Macpherson Report (1999) into the murder of Stephen Lawrence declared that the Metropolitan Police were “institutionally racist”. This verdict inhibited law enforcement against minorities for years afterwards.

    The notion of “institutional racism” was pure virtue signalling, of course: the problems with the Lawrence investigation arose from straightforward police corruption, which has still not been properly investigated.

    There are two ways to deal with a complaint against a person from a minority, without being accused of racism:
    (a) Use your brain. Look at the evidence in front of you. Forget the person’s race, except when asking “would I be treating a white person the same way?”
    (b) Treat the complaint as motivated by racism. Ignore it, as if the accused is a noble savage who cannot possibly have the same vices as other people.

    You can start out following strategy (a), but if your manager or superior officer is following strategy (b) you will quickly find that you have made a career-limiting move. In fact, for strategy (a) to work it must be followed by your entire reporting chain, right up to elected politicians. So in fact there are not two ways to avoid career-limiting accusations of racism – there is only one.

    I think this is the atmosphere that prevailed after Macpherson, and it may be sufficient to explain why officialdom turned a blind eye to the Muslim gangs. However, some episodes are so extreme that they seem hard to explain without either police corruption or the extreme ineptitude that is not unknown in the Yorkshire constabularies.

    In a particularly extreme case, police were called because a man was banging on a Muslim’s door. The first man’s 15-year-old daughter was inside the house. The police arrived, searched the house, and found the girl, drunk, hiding under a bed. They arrested her for assault, and arrested her father for racial abuse. Then they left three Muslim men in the house with the other white girls that they had groomed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @Thea
    I don't understand how it got to this point where they don't stop the rape of their women.

    Is it TV? It had to start way before smart phones. British inner city youth were to be feared at one time.

    These people gave the world punk rock and now they care about hurting others feelings?

    Totalitarian state which only enforces the laws one-way. It’s called anarcho-tyranny. They are allowed to rape our girls wholesale but if we so much as make a peep about it or try to organize political resistance to it, it’s off to the government gulag with the worst of the violent brown criminal invaders as cellmates. An edgy youth movement in Britain called National Action spreading awareness of such issues was banned as a “terrorist” group under the flimsy pretext that an ANONYMOUS user on twitter who claimed to be part of their group said that the MP Jo Cox deserved to die. And when the people who were in it formed new groups, they then were arrested and have been tossed behind bars.

    You really don’t understand that it’s the whole system against indigenous resistance to this illegal genetic modification program no one wanted, no one voted for it, no one even had any serious debate about and which was implemented from the top-down with no consent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @Cloudbuster
    In Rwanda, the Sudan, Somalia and elsewhere, highly motivated individuals seem to be doing quite well with machetes.

    Your machetes won’t do so well to their guns (which they have because the law looks the other way except when they commit the most egregious crimes) and their oppressive occupational government as defender’s guns. The English are an embattled people with an occupation government invading them with brown mercenaries and letting those brown mercenaries rape their daughters and in some cases forcefully impregnate them with mongrel children, and they can do or say nothing without being jailed by the surveillance state which only watches them.

    You don’t understand that both the invaders and government are in cahoots. They’ve been brought in, the government allows them to commit daily atrocity and only when the government can’t hide it or cover it up do the brown invaders get jailed at all. The rape gangs were going on for a QUARTER CENTURY before Rotherham broke. The authorities knew! They did nothing. They ran Nick Griffin and other BNP members through the ringer for talking about it before the big reveal and now it’s been revealed that virtually anywhere these disgusting brown people live in the country, this is happening.

    Read More
    • Agree: ben tillman
    • Replies: @Thea
    At what point did the anti-indigenous government take over?

    My neighbor moved here from Bradford. He said the same thing you said about the rapes going for years and everyone knew and did nothing.

    And wha ly happened to Prince Harry? He used to date pretty young blonds. Now he found an ugly divorced old hag who acted in gross sex scenes on national television.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @Lex
    Part of the reason why white girls are targeted:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Birmingham_riots

    The Birmingham riots of 2005 occurred on two consecutive nights on Saturday 22 October and Sunday 23 October 2005 in the Lozells and Handsworth area of Birmingham, England. The riots were derived from ethnic tensions between the Caribbean and British Asian communities, with the spark for the riot being an alleged gang rape of a teenage black girl by a group of South Asian men.
     
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/how-muslims-are-kept-mostly-peaceful-in-india/

    Rioting was defended as constitutional by John Adams, among others, in the 1770s. At the time America was still a set of English colonies, and the unwritten English constitution formed a nebulous sort of “higher law” in the background of written law.

    Americans would get outraged by the high-handed behavior of tax authorities and respond by trashing the tax office, roughing up the excisemen, and burning their papers. Englishmen did similar things, though often on a bigger scale (the Gordon Riots for instance). Generally the mob violence was pretty focused on the objects of outrage, ie they’d loot the East India Company’s tea warehouse, not the local dry goods store.

    Adams argued that this was simply how you got redress when you had no other means of moving the authorities, hence it was constitutional. It may have been a self-serving argument, but no one else seems to have been serving the colonists in this matter.

    Pauline Maeir’s From Resistance to Revolution goes into some detail on the idea of the constitutional riot.

    As the Clash noted, a riot can be a practical solution to a problem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @jim jones
    My neighbour here in London has a shotgun, all you need to do is get a license:

    http://www.shootinguk.co.uk/shooting/start-shooting/how-to-get-shotgun-certificate-licence-32358

    Yikes, who would bother to go through all that? An illegal weapon would be far easier and cheaper to acquire I would think.

    All Americans should read through that list of intrusive and bureaucratic steps involved in just getting permission to own a shotgun. Then you have to get the dang license renewed in 5 years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @Tiny Duck
    I find it hard to believe that fear of being labeled racist is what kept the police from pursuing this, as they seem to be claiming. The police didn't just fail to investigate; they actively impeded any possible investigation and punished people who pressed the issue. Maybe political correctness did influence some people who might have stepped in, but for others it sounds more like a convenient excuse. I'm sure there is a lot more to this story and that what we know so far only scratches the surface. I wouldn't lay the main blame on multiculturalism's doorstep just yet.

    Let's not lose focus of the real threat to women (white male christians) just because a few Men of Color take advantage of libertine western seductresses

    Let’s not lose focus of the real threat to women (white male christians) just because a few Men of Color take advantage of libertine western seductresses

    I was getting a little worried about you while reading that first paragraph. But the last part pulled out the dive in classic form.

    Thank you emotional comfort duck!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. How is it Englishmen allowed this to happen and still take no action? Are they all emasculated?

    Anarcho-Tyranny. The traitorous state is on the Pakis’ side, hostile to the natives. The eventual outcome will be Civil War, but the welfare state and Big Media will delay the onset beyond what would historically be expected.

    I and others like me are willing to do what needs doing, but not for a race that will vilify and punish, rather than thank and reward them. Hell, I’d settle for “ignore and tolerate,” but that’s not in the cards for a while yet, either.

    All of this garbage has been swallowed hook, line and sinker by whites in Western Europe and North America. We have no ability to even think as a people anymore, to think at all.

    Not quite. Whites have pathological white tribal identity, not no white tribal identity. E.g., this is how whites know not to hold non-whites to the standards whites are held to; whites know that “the rules” are white rules. The goal is to delegitimize and extirpate the dominant, pathological white tribal identity, and replace it with a healthy one.

    White men may have lost their masculinity and religion, but other men haven’t. They will fight for their people and their beliefs. Even if they’re not very good at it, they still win because we don’t even show up.

    Especially for Europe, I find it hard to believe that 50 or 100 years from now one of two things didn’t happen. Either whites found their identity again and fought back or Muslims and Africans basically took over and white just blended in. But what has little chance of surviving is this feminized “We are the World”/Diversity Uber Alles culture. It’s just too vulnerable, too easy to game and take over.

    Again, you’re mistaking pathological white identity for something else. Whites (mistakenly) see “their” gov’ts as theirs, as legitimate. Thus, they still defer to them. This is slowly changing – though far more quickly than it was in 2003 when I started paying attention to politics.

    When whites come to see their gov’ts as illegitimate in considerable numbers, that’s when things will start to get interesting.

    To sustain a civilised society, it is not sufficient for the “majority” of the population (50% + 1) to avoid committing serious crime; or even for the “vast majority” (say 90%) to avoid doing so. It is necessary for almost everyone not to commit serious crime.

    Indeed. Humans are, roughly speaking, divided into positive, negative, and neutral. Positives do good, negatives do bad, and neutrals do okay. The positives being balanced by the negatives does not make for a good society. The negatives must be far outweighed by the positives. Otherwise you have a society where the negatives destroy what the positives make, nearly as fast as they can make it. E.g., Africa, where they tear down phone lines to sell the copper, and transformers to get the oil for cooking in.

    What is a “Pakistani” but a label, a social construct.

    Human organs are a social construct. There’s no bright line separating an organ from the surrounding tissue. It’s all just human flesh. So there’s really nothing to worry about, at, say, the prospect of having one’s brains blown out. There’s plenty more flesh to go around.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  74. @Steve Sailer
    The term "pedophilia" gives the wrong angle on Rotherham and the other grooming gangs. Most of these girls were post-pubescent but underage, so it's just regular heterosexual statutory rape and sometimes rape rape.

    http://takimag.com/article/the_real_threat_to_british_elites_steve_sailer/print#axzz57dvyh8BX

    And the urine and the beatings and the completely undiscussed tribal angle, these girls being “fair game” because of their identity — none of that is really covered by any terms.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Charles Pewitt
    Nigel Farage on Muslim Rape Gangs in Rotherham

    Nigel Farage:

    "The reason that the blind eye was turned is because race was an issue. Had these offenders been from a different race, I suspect more would have been done earlier. That is not an extraordinary thing to say, that is pretty much an accepted fact."

    https://twitter.com/CharlesPewitt/status/564828141580189696

    In 2004, the BNP’s Nick Griffin was arrested and charged for inciting hatred, because he spoke about the grooming gangs and who was behind them, while at a constituency meeting.
    Farage’s stated goal was to destroy the BNP, likely because they opposed all immigration and wanted to repatriate the non-Whites. Farage, by helping destroy the BNP, has been part of the problem, not the solution.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonym
    https://youtu.be/2rB4QkAorYY

    Well whaddaya know. I have certainly lost respect for Farage after that cucked response. Nick Griffin certainly has my respect for representing British people at a time when few thought that way or would support him.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @Curmudgeon
    In 2004, the BNP's Nick Griffin was arrested and charged for inciting hatred, because he spoke about the grooming gangs and who was behind them, while at a constituency meeting.
    Farage's stated goal was to destroy the BNP, likely because they opposed all immigration and wanted to repatriate the non-Whites. Farage, by helping destroy the BNP, has been part of the problem, not the solution.

    Well whaddaya know. I have certainly lost respect for Farage after that cucked response. Nick Griffin certainly has my respect for representing British people at a time when few thought that way or would support him.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @Saxon
    Your machetes won't do so well to their guns (which they have because the law looks the other way except when they commit the most egregious crimes) and their oppressive occupational government as defender's guns. The English are an embattled people with an occupation government invading them with brown mercenaries and letting those brown mercenaries rape their daughters and in some cases forcefully impregnate them with mongrel children, and they can do or say nothing without being jailed by the surveillance state which only watches them.

    You don't understand that both the invaders and government are in cahoots. They've been brought in, the government allows them to commit daily atrocity and only when the government can't hide it or cover it up do the brown invaders get jailed at all. The rape gangs were going on for a QUARTER CENTURY before Rotherham broke. The authorities knew! They did nothing. They ran Nick Griffin and other BNP members through the ringer for talking about it before the big reveal and now it's been revealed that virtually anywhere these disgusting brown people live in the country, this is happening.

    At what point did the anti-indigenous government take over?

    My neighbor moved here from Bradford. He said the same thing you said about the rapes going for years and everyone knew and did nothing.

    And wha ly happened to Prince Harry? He used to date pretty young blonds. Now he found an ugly divorced old hag who acted in gross sex scenes on national television.

    Read More
    • Replies: @notanon

    At what point did the anti-indigenous government take over?
     
    early 1980s after the collapse of the Soviet Union meant the banking mafia stopped being scared of communism

    And wha ly happened to Prince Harry?
     
    there was some kind of incident at the Royal bank (Coutts) some years ago which didn't register much at the time but i wouldn't be surprised if the banking mafia got the Royals under their thumb then and have been awaiting an opportunity to call in the favor.

    http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Prince+Charles+Evelyn+de+Rothschild+Prince+Fe92XCZvAKcl.jpg
    , @Saxon
    1947 at the very earliest, when the boat SS Windrush brought the first load of Caribbean blacks. In the mid 60s when the Jewish elite used state force to create the Race Relations Act in order to shut down and imprison the leader of a "National Socialist" movement of the time speaking out against jews flooding the country with coloreds is probably when it became obvious. John Enoch Powell had his famous speech not too long after and he was overwhelmingly popular but of course he was removed from the political parties for saying what no one can now deny was obvious.

    Probably earlier than then, though. I believe Oswald Mosley was cheated out of being elected by fraud, and he was then imprisoned to stop him from holding rallies once the war began. Maybe it goes back as far as the 1600s when Dutch mercenaries were employed to overthrow the monarchy of the time to install the square mile "City of London" and the "Bank of England" which is not very English.

    The book "Easy Meat" estimates that at least 10,000 girls are in sex slavery to these monsters at any given time. Their entire "communities" are guilty by my estimation.

    As for what the deal is with Harry, who knows. He's probably not even Charles' child. Looks like one of Diana's ginger bodyguards.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @James N. Kennett

    The grooming gangs pimp the girls out to hundreds of men – so a ratio of 1:10 of groomers to girls is reasonable but the ratio of customers to girls is at least 10:1.
     
    I don't believe it. If there are a hundred times more "customers" than "groomers", you end up with many more "customers" than there are Muslim men in Rotherham.

    It is true that the girls were taken to other towns to be abused by other men. However, this was a two-way street: those men also groomed and abused local girls and took them to Rotherham. The ratio of abusers to victims remains the same.

    I don’t believe it. If there are a hundred times more “customers” than “groomers”, you end up with many more “customers” than there are Muslim men in Rotherham.

    nope

    there are millions of illegal immigrants working in minority-owned businesses who are paid very little and sending most of it back home.

    this is the big lie aspect of all this – it’s not primarily pedophilia it’s industrial scale forced child prostitution cos children are easier to hold down.

    it’s happening on a similar scale with mexican children being trafficked into the US to service illegals in the US (or Nigerian children trafficked by Nigerian gangs to service Nigerian illegals etc). the big difference with Muslims is their culture is so ****ed up they have to lock their children away to be safe so they have to get the girls from the native population.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @Thea
    At what point did the anti-indigenous government take over?

    My neighbor moved here from Bradford. He said the same thing you said about the rapes going for years and everyone knew and did nothing.

    And wha ly happened to Prince Harry? He used to date pretty young blonds. Now he found an ugly divorced old hag who acted in gross sex scenes on national television.

    At what point did the anti-indigenous government take over?

    early 1980s after the collapse of the Soviet Union meant the banking mafia stopped being scared of communism

    And wha ly happened to Prince Harry?

    there was some kind of incident at the Royal bank (Coutts) some years ago which didn’t register much at the time but i wouldn’t be surprised if the banking mafia got the Royals under their thumb then and have been awaiting an opportunity to call in the favor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Almost Missouri
    Per Wikipedia, there are a bit above 100k people in Rotherham USD, of which about 86% (and falling) were white British, and 8.6% (and rising) were "Asian".

    So 90k white British Rotherhamites ÷ 2 = 45k females ≈ 5000 11-18 year old girls = about one in three or four were raped!

    So the first time that the old feminist canard about 1 in 4 women being raped actually turns out to be documentarily true, they suddenly don't want to talk about it. This is dispositive evidence that feminism has nothing to do with femininity per se, but is just the distaff flavor of civilization wrecking.

    P.S. 9000 Asians ÷ 2 = 4500 Asian males ≈ 2500 post-pubescent/pre-impotent Asian Rotherhamite men. If the victims were pimped to "hundreds" ... 1500 × 100s = 150,000s. Undoubtedly many were repeat customers, and a few may have commuted from outside Rotherham (but why bother when every town seems to have this?), but 150000/2500 = at least 60 rapes per sexually active Rotherhamite Asian male sure looks like a large plurality, if not most, Rotherhamite Paki men were involved.

    So 90k white British Rotherhamites ÷ 2 = 45k females ≈ 5000 11-18 year old girls = about one in three or four were raped!

    the girls are groomed around age 11-13 and rebel around 15-16 so the total number over 20 years involves maybe 200-400 girls at a time

    there’s also a thing been happening all over the West since the most extreme kind of SJWs came to dominate child services which is they have become very aggressive about taking children away from parents they feel are unsuitable (which includes parents who are too Christian) and putting them into group homes a long away from their home town.

    (there’s a secondary aspect to this of snatching children for the lucrative adoption market as a lot of the adoption agencies are run by ex child services people)

    so the victims from group homes could have come from the whole county or beyond and not just Rotherham itself.

    #

    sure looks like a large plurality, if not most, Rotherhamite Paki men were involved.

    the aspect of this which has been completely hidden so far is this is mostly not about pedophilia it’s industrial scale child prostitution and the majority of customers are the millions of illegal immigrants who send most of their money home and thus have very little spending money – and the grooming gangs are often paid by the employers of the illegals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @jbwilson24
    "we must remember that at least 90% of our Muslim neighbours are decent people."

    A load of nonsense.

    One of the police officers interviewed for the Jay report stated that half the Paki men in Rotherham were involved.

    In no other case of gang rapes are there women actively covering up the rape of children. The men would make the girls call the wives on the telephone. The women knew what was going on and did nothing.

    These are not 'decent people'. They are third world savages ripe for a purging.

    Judging by comments made to the media by the paki women, they believe white girls deserved it and lured the men in.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @Thea
    At what point did the anti-indigenous government take over?

    My neighbor moved here from Bradford. He said the same thing you said about the rapes going for years and everyone knew and did nothing.

    And wha ly happened to Prince Harry? He used to date pretty young blonds. Now he found an ugly divorced old hag who acted in gross sex scenes on national television.

    1947 at the very earliest, when the boat SS Windrush brought the first load of Caribbean blacks. In the mid 60s when the Jewish elite used state force to create the Race Relations Act in order to shut down and imprison the leader of a “National Socialist” movement of the time speaking out against jews flooding the country with coloreds is probably when it became obvious. John Enoch Powell had his famous speech not too long after and he was overwhelmingly popular but of course he was removed from the political parties for saying what no one can now deny was obvious.

    Probably earlier than then, though. I believe Oswald Mosley was cheated out of being elected by fraud, and he was then imprisoned to stop him from holding rallies once the war began. Maybe it goes back as far as the 1600s when Dutch mercenaries were employed to overthrow the monarchy of the time to install the square mile “City of London” and the “Bank of England” which is not very English.

    The book “Easy Meat” estimates that at least 10,000 girls are in sex slavery to these monsters at any given time. Their entire “communities” are guilty by my estimation.

    As for what the deal is with Harry, who knows. He’s probably not even Charles’ child. Looks like one of Diana’s ginger bodyguards.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. there’s also a thing been happening all over the West since the most extreme kind of SJWs came to dominate child services which is they have become very aggressive about taking children away from parents they feel are unsuitable (which includes parents who are too Christian) and putting them into group homes a long away from their home town.

    (there’s a secondary aspect to this of snatching children for the lucrative adoption market as a lot of the adoption agencies are run by ex child services people)

    Harold Covington used an American version of this as one of the main causes of insurgency in his Northwest Republic novels. He cribbed a lot from the IRA, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he picked this up from reading about the UK.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  84. @eah
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DWfoxKxWkAEZUgl.jpg

    Asian grooming gangs abused 700 girls and vulnerable women with ‘arrogant persistence’ because they were ‘not investigated’ before major operation was launched to stop them

    Report into authorities’ response to child sexual exploitation in Newcastle — Series of trials saw 22 defendants sentenced for rape, drugs and prostitution — Review has been hit by just one defendant agreeing to help – who denied guilt — A 150-page report has been published into the authorities’ response to child sexual exploitation (CSE) in Newcastle, following a series of trials which saw 22 defendants sentenced for a range of offences including rape, drugs and prostitution — Efforts to find out why the perpetrators thought they could abuse vulnerable women and girls have been rebuffed, with only one defendant agreeing to help the inquiry, and he denied guilt, blaming a government cover up — But before 2014, the report stated that perpetrators were not consistently investigated and so went unpunished — The report said: ‘This sent an unhelpful message to perpetrators – they were unlikely to be prosecuted or prevented from continuing to abuse – encouraging an arrogant persistence — ‘It also had a significant impact on victims who learnt that nothing would be done against perpetrators.’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  86. @whorefinder
    Related: Danny Boyle (Millions director) directed the opening ceremony of the 2012 London Olympic games, replete with images of black Britons taking over ---there's an extended bit where a mixed race teenage girl with a black father and white mother parties goes out and parties night away with her also-dark-skinned boyfriend and some club, grinding away in a way that stripper would've been embarrassed of just 40 years ago.

    And of course the Queen embarrassed and lowered herself to being in a sad sketch involving James Bond, debasing the entire Royal position. That part shocked me the most, as the Queen seemed to be the last remaining stiff-upper-lip Brit who knew to act serious and noble in public.

    Of course, Boyle's parents were Irish, so perhaps he gets off on the idea of Blighty becoming blighted.

    All in all, the 2012 opening ceremonies--and lack of outrage about them--- had me firmly convinced that England was dead and buried as a culture. Brexit and Tommy Robinson, however, have convinced me that all is not lost for Albion.

    Couldn’t agree with you more. 2012 opening ceremony was my watershed moment: it ensured that I would eventually switch from a completely cucked open-borders libertarian to a nationalist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Another day, another report about sexual abuse by Muslims, this time of 700 girls in Newcastle and the surrounding area.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/23/northumbria-police-operation-sanctuary-newcastle-grooming-gangs-case-review

    The report itself can be found here:

    https://www.nscb.org.uk/joint-serious-case-review-concerning-sexual-exploitation-newcastle

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored