The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Female Solidarity in Action
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Lyrics here.

 
Hide 95 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. I know that my observations are not “proven” by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is “happening” between males and females!!

    • Replies: @JW
    Guys love guns and women don't.
    , @Jim Christian

    Something is “happening” between males and females!!
     
    Yep! The girls are running the show. Not sure if the few boys are trannies, or just VERY low-T, but Hogg is the strongest-looking of all of the boys and he's soft, weak, effeminate. The 60s had Rubin and Abby Hoffman and Hayden, real hell-raisers and women like Jane Fonda slept with all of them. The fights in the streets were real and back then, the cops waded in. It was war. These kids today don't stand a chance. Not that anyone is challenging them in the streets. As for the missing boys that have a little T left in them? They're at the range, making things ready. Quietly, they're holding on to their guns, thank you very much. The girls marching must be very entertaining to them.
    , @Dr. X

    ... in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males.
     
    Definitely a chickfest. And a childfest. The relative few males were either poofters or betas.

    Funny thing is, the gun community is very welcoming of females. Some of the top competitive shooters in the country are females.

    https://www.nrablog.com/articles/2013/12/what-does-shooting-legend-nancy-tompkins-bring-to-the-range/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Golob

    https://www.facebook.com/USAMU1956/photos/pb.251278279733.-2207520000.1470197282./10154551653334734/?type=3

    https://cowgirlmagazine.com/kenda-lenseigne/

    But they're in the minority and everything they know they learned from men. Most women -- urban single ones especially -- are herd animals and they hate guns.

    , @Whiskey
    Women are the natural and eternal enemy of the Beta White male. Which is 90% easily of White men.

    Women HATE HATE HATE guns ... in the hands of beta males. Because it equalizes the equation between a Reginald Denny and a Damien "Football" Williams. Imagine if Denny had a gun that day, not even a high capacity, and we saw on live TV not Damien "Football" Willams bashing Denny's head in with a brick, over and over again, laughing (as millions of women get ... excited over the dominance) but rather shot instead?

    That would upset the "natural order of dominance" that single, unmarried, and Upper Class women (regardless of marital status) want -- the dominance of a few Alpha White males and the thuggery of various non Whites.

    If there is one thing White women HATE HATE HATE its beta males being "uppity" and defending themselves, as much as they love love love displays of dominance by non White males with natural low IQs. Heck the Rotherham/Telford child rape and forced prostitution scandals just make Muslim men more dominant. Unfortunately women are just hard-wired to find dominance arousing the way men find a shapely young woman arousing. Neither sex can do anything about it and the mass female driven consumer market dominates in turn men in a vicious cycle. Men don't buy much consumer goods, advertising in both people and product becomes more female centric, repeat until the soy boi latte drinking gay guy is figured to be too testosterone laden.

    Why would a woman want an ordinary man armed any more than she'd want him able to drink, or be able to do drugs, or watch pr0n, or ride a motorcycle, or anything like that! Save the polar bears, outlaw the internal combustion engine, Harley Davidson, guns, booze, pictures of pretty women, its all the same. From Temperance to Gun Control -- the war of Women on Men, White people edition.
    , @Rosie

    I know that my observations are not “proven” by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is “happening” between males and females!!
     
    Not only are your observations not proven, but in fact a majority of White women almost always vote for Republicans despite their excellent record on gun rights. The most you can say is that most people who are passionately anti-gun are women, and that doesn't mean most White women are anti-gun.
    , @S. Anonyia
    Women are socialized into being wimps except in redneckland and the inner city.

    Irony is, people on the alt right are always complaining that the issue with women is that they aren’t feminine enough, but the gun-grabbers are very stereotypically feminine in attitude (if not appearance.)

  2. A disturbingly accurate video.

  3. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:

    For all women who love gun control:

    • Replies: @flyingtiger
    The woman with the firearm was not given proper instructions on how to stand by the males standing by. Plus modeling is rough. They never talk about how many women are injured each year. I bet it is worse than football players.
  4. This has to be parody. Otherwise, why the meretricious apparel? If not parody, it must be a working girl, trolling for a trick. No?

  5. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:

    You seem to really like this show.

  6. • Replies: @Antlitz Grollheim
    Great comment.

    That passive aggressive video, that alpha picture, daring you to do something about her ugliness, tells you everything one needs to know about women and power.
    , @ThreeCranes
    With her looks she could be taken for Rodney Dangerfield's sister (if he had one).

    http://www.rodney.com/images/bg/Jokes.jpg

    , @Autochthon
    Is there footage of her eating a frog from a hookah? Where is Salacious Crumb? Just cropped below the photo's lower frame, right?
    , @Macumazahn
    I think I've seen that photo before, perhaps it was when I looked up the word "barhog" in the dictionary.
    , @Father O'Hara
    She had got to be Jewish.
  7. Speaking of failures in female solidarity,,,,,

    Seven men have been found guilty of grooming and sexually abusing teenage girls “on a massive scale” in Oxford.

    The gang was convicted of more than 20 offences including rape and indecent assault between 1998 and 2005.

    Prosecutor Oliver Saxby QC said they carried out the “routine, cynical and predatory sexual exploitation” of vulnerable girls who were groomed with alcohol and drugs.

    Assad Hussain, 37, of Iffley Road, Oxford, guilty of five counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault, not guilty of one count of indecent assault.
    Kameer Iqbal, 39, of Dashwood Road, Oxford, guilty of three counts of rape.
    Khalid Hussain, 38, of Ashhurst Way, Oxford, guilty of rape and indecent assault, not guilty of one count of rape.
    Kamran Khan, 36, of Northfield Road, Bolton, guilty of indecent assault and false imprisonment, not guilty of rape.
    Moinul Islam, 41, of Wykeham Crescent, Oxford, guilty of rape, two counts of indecent assault and supplying cannabis, not guilty of false imprisonment.
    Raheem Ahmed, 40 of Starwort Path, Oxford, guilty of two counts of indecent assault and false imprisonment, not guilty of rape.
    Alladitta Yousaf, 48, of Bodley Road, Oxford, guilty of indecent assault.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-41608602

    • Replies: @Forbes
    "Mostly Sagittarius"!! I'm howling. LOL!
    , @Rosie
    As I mentioned in another thread, if a White billlionaire was offering to fund protests against grooming gangs, I assure you he could get thousands of heels on the ground. He who pays the piper all the tune, and the so-called "feminist movement" is no exception.
    , @Escher
    Rowing club members they are definitely not.
  8. @CCZ
    I know that my observations are not "proven" by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is "happening" between males and females!!

    Guys love guns and women don’t.

  9. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:

    Women are dumb as hell.

  10. @CCZ
    I know that my observations are not "proven" by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is "happening" between males and females!!

    Something is “happening” between males and females!!

    Yep! The girls are running the show. Not sure if the few boys are trannies, or just VERY low-T, but Hogg is the strongest-looking of all of the boys and he’s soft, weak, effeminate. The 60s had Rubin and Abby Hoffman and Hayden, real hell-raisers and women like Jane Fonda slept with all of them. The fights in the streets were real and back then, the cops waded in. It was war. These kids today don’t stand a chance. Not that anyone is challenging them in the streets. As for the missing boys that have a little T left in them? They’re at the range, making things ready. Quietly, they’re holding on to their guns, thank you very much. The girls marching must be very entertaining to them.

  11. With respect to the guns, I figure it’s unattached women who are anti-gun. Right? On average over-indexing single is what I mean.

    Normal women are fine with their husbands knowing how to use firearms; the expect their husbands to know stuff like that. My wife gets irritated if I don’t carry when we go out, wants a gun by my side of the bed, all that.

    That same behavior becomes threatening when you don’t have prospects of getting your own man. In that case the implicit violence of a gun is never going to be something that serves your interests; it can only ever be a threat. These women are married to the State and want the state to play the protector role.

    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Neoconned
    I remember in the mid 90s my redneck neighbor got a nasty divorce. Because a judge said so, he had to pay all utilities and the mortgage. His ex wife moved her Egyptian bf in and would send her two sons to the grandparents so she could party w Achmed.

    She ended up having a bastard daughter with Achmed who skipped the country and returned home.

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men.... palimony, alimony, child support, "she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage" and so forth.

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed.... or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don't want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives
    , @Anon
    Why wouldn't single women be interested in possessing a firearm for their own defense?
    , @SOL
    Last time I looked online, maybe 10 years ago, there was a survey showing that even among women gun-owners, they tended to be more supportive of stricter gun-control laws than gun-owning men. It's a female psychology thing.
  12. #METOOMETOOMETOOMETOO

    x infinity

  13. @Buzz Mohawk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qzz6m5HIwI

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/02/16/21/494C7BC200000578-5401669-image-m-49_1518817061529.jpg

    Great comment.

    That passive aggressive video, that alpha picture, daring you to do something about her ugliness, tells you everything one needs to know about women and power.

  14. @CCZ
    I know that my observations are not "proven" by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is "happening" between males and females!!

    … in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males.

    Definitely a chickfest. And a childfest. The relative few males were either poofters or betas.

    Funny thing is, the gun community is very welcoming of females. Some of the top competitive shooters in the country are females.

    https://www.nrablog.com/articles/2013/12/what-does-shooting-legend-nancy-tompkins-bring-to-the-range/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Golob

    Staff Sgt. Amanda Elsenboss

    Posted by U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit on Thursday, July 28, 2016

    https://cowgirlmagazine.com/kenda-lenseigne/

    But they’re in the minority and everything they know they learned from men. Most women — urban single ones especially — are herd animals and they hate guns.

    • Replies: @DFH
    I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting.
  15. @Bryan
    With respect to the guns, I figure it's unattached women who are anti-gun. Right? On average over-indexing single is what I mean.

    Normal women are fine with their husbands knowing how to use firearms; the expect their husbands to know stuff like that. My wife gets irritated if I don't carry when we go out, wants a gun by my side of the bed, all that.

    That same behavior becomes threatening when you don't have prospects of getting your own man. In that case the implicit violence of a gun is never going to be something that serves your interests; it can only ever be a threat. These women are married to the State and want the state to play the protector role.

    I remember in the mid 90s my redneck neighbor got a nasty divorce. Because a judge said so, he had to pay all utilities and the mortgage. His ex wife moved her Egyptian bf in and would send her two sons to the grandparents so she could party w Achmed.

    She ended up having a bastard daughter with Achmed who skipped the country and returned home.

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men…. palimony, alimony, child support, “she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage” and so forth.

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed…. or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don’t want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives

    • Agree: Autochthon, AndrewR, L Woods
    • Replies: @Macumazahn
    I used to know a multiply-divorced woman, about whom a buddy remarked, "She's a great housekeeper. Divorced twice, kept the house both times."
    , @njguy73

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men…. palimony, alimony, child support, “she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage” and so forth.
     
    Any man who gets married without a prenup gets what he deserves.
    , @L Woods
    Your daily reminder that the demise of this disgusting order can't come soon enough.
    , @Rosie

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed…. or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don’t want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives
     
    I suppose there may be some truth to this in rare cases, but the truth of the matter is that the oligarchs want men disarmed so they can't avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration.
  16. @Buzz Mohawk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qzz6m5HIwI

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/02/16/21/494C7BC200000578-5401669-image-m-49_1518817061529.jpg

    With her looks she could be taken for Rodney Dangerfield’s sister (if he had one).

    • Replies: @Alec Leamas
    Beat me to it. Too on the nose.
    , @ChrisZ
    Thanks, Cranes. Just a *picture* of that guy gets me laughing. I saw Rodney perform in Atlantic City years ago, and I was on the floor from the second he set foot on the stage.
  17. Anonymous[346] • Disclaimer says:

    Related:

    PUSH: The topic of oral cancer risk as a result of oral sex with HPV-positive females has been getting exposure in the media.

    PUSHBACK: Top film star (Hunger Games chick) does interview claiming she’s a germophobe and “dick is dangerous”…

    • Replies: @Forbes
    Carpet-munching Hunger Games chick is probably HPV-positive, so it doesn't matter...
  18. @Buzz Mohawk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qzz6m5HIwI

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/02/16/21/494C7BC200000578-5401669-image-m-49_1518817061529.jpg

    Is there footage of her eating a frog from a hookah? Where is Salacious Crumb? Just cropped below the photo’s lower frame, right?

  19. @CCZ
    I know that my observations are not "proven" by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is "happening" between males and females!!

    Women are the natural and eternal enemy of the Beta White male. Which is 90% easily of White men.

    Women HATE HATE HATE guns … in the hands of beta males. Because it equalizes the equation between a Reginald Denny and a Damien “Football” Williams. Imagine if Denny had a gun that day, not even a high capacity, and we saw on live TV not Damien “Football” Willams bashing Denny’s head in with a brick, over and over again, laughing (as millions of women get … excited over the dominance) but rather shot instead?

    That would upset the “natural order of dominance” that single, unmarried, and Upper Class women (regardless of marital status) want — the dominance of a few Alpha White males and the thuggery of various non Whites.

    If there is one thing White women HATE HATE HATE its beta males being “uppity” and defending themselves, as much as they love love love displays of dominance by non White males with natural low IQs. Heck the Rotherham/Telford child rape and forced prostitution scandals just make Muslim men more dominant. Unfortunately women are just hard-wired to find dominance arousing the way men find a shapely young woman arousing. Neither sex can do anything about it and the mass female driven consumer market dominates in turn men in a vicious cycle. Men don’t buy much consumer goods, advertising in both people and product becomes more female centric, repeat until the soy boi latte drinking gay guy is figured to be too testosterone laden.

    Why would a woman want an ordinary man armed any more than she’d want him able to drink, or be able to do drugs, or watch pr0n, or ride a motorcycle, or anything like that! Save the polar bears, outlaw the internal combustion engine, Harley Davidson, guns, booze, pictures of pretty women, its all the same. From Temperance to Gun Control — the war of Women on Men, White people edition.

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    This is perhaps a bit over the top. But the basic picture is accurate
  20. @Bryan
    With respect to the guns, I figure it's unattached women who are anti-gun. Right? On average over-indexing single is what I mean.

    Normal women are fine with their husbands knowing how to use firearms; the expect their husbands to know stuff like that. My wife gets irritated if I don't carry when we go out, wants a gun by my side of the bed, all that.

    That same behavior becomes threatening when you don't have prospects of getting your own man. In that case the implicit violence of a gun is never going to be something that serves your interests; it can only ever be a threat. These women are married to the State and want the state to play the protector role.

    Why wouldn’t single women be interested in possessing a firearm for their own defense?

    • Replies: @grapesoda
    Some of them are, but many are cowards and want Big Daddy Gov to do their dirty work for them. Ergo, 2nd Amendment rights are useless to them unless they are philosophically sophisticated enough to understand the "last defense against tyranny (tranny)" argument.
    , @schnellandine
    99% fear of the unknown. Most antigun women can be encouraged to a range to at least try shooting. If that intro's done properly (understanding her fear), near instant conversion.
    , @Rosie
    I'm not single, but I didn't own one when I was, not because of a lack of philosophical sophistication but rather a bit too much of it. A moment of paralysis by analysis and the bad guy, who is already bigger and stronger than you, gets the gun.

    On the other hand, a neighbor with a gun can definitely bring peace of mind. Just because a particular single woman chooses not to have a gun herself doesn't mean she doesn't appreciate the importance of guns and men who are willing to use them.
  21. @Buzz Mohawk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qzz6m5HIwI

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/02/16/21/494C7BC200000578-5401669-image-m-49_1518817061529.jpg

    I think I’ve seen that photo before, perhaps it was when I looked up the word “barhog” in the dictionary.

    • Replies: @Forbes
    Or beached whale...
    , @Percy Gryce
    In my callow youth in the Midwest the term we used was "moonpig."
  22. @Neoconned
    I remember in the mid 90s my redneck neighbor got a nasty divorce. Because a judge said so, he had to pay all utilities and the mortgage. His ex wife moved her Egyptian bf in and would send her two sons to the grandparents so she could party w Achmed.

    She ended up having a bastard daughter with Achmed who skipped the country and returned home.

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men.... palimony, alimony, child support, "she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage" and so forth.

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed.... or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don't want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives

    I used to know a multiply-divorced woman, about whom a buddy remarked, “She’s a great housekeeper. Divorced twice, kept the house both times.”

  23. @Dr. X

    ... in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males.
     
    Definitely a chickfest. And a childfest. The relative few males were either poofters or betas.

    Funny thing is, the gun community is very welcoming of females. Some of the top competitive shooters in the country are females.

    https://www.nrablog.com/articles/2013/12/what-does-shooting-legend-nancy-tompkins-bring-to-the-range/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Golob

    https://www.facebook.com/USAMU1956/photos/pb.251278279733.-2207520000.1470197282./10154551653334734/?type=3

    https://cowgirlmagazine.com/kenda-lenseigne/

    But they're in the minority and everything they know they learned from men. Most women -- urban single ones especially -- are herd animals and they hate guns.

    I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting.

    • Replies: @3g4me
    @21 DFH: "I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting."

    I've seen this assertion before but I disagree. The vast majority of top shooters are men - and that's not merely because far fewer women shoot.

    What I think more likely is that women are more ignorant of guns in general and so have fewer bad habits to unlearn - plus nothing to prove to any friends - so no cocky attitude and more open to instruction. I knew just how ignorant I was when I was learning to shoot, plus I didn't want to deal with my son's scorn, so I paid close attention and he was surprisingly patient.

    We went to the range again just last week - first time I'd gone in a few months. I actually did quite well - but that was definitely the result of doubling up on hearing protection. I'm not afraid of weapons, but the blast is always louder than I expect and I was tensing up in anticipation, and thus jerking the trigger. With extra hearing protection I was far more relaxed, and really focused on squeezing the trigger. Two to the chest, one to the head . Nice grouping on the first, merely singed the ear a few times on the second but the rest went right where I intended. Made me proud of myself!
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting.
     
    Maybe, but do you think they could be better than "White Feather" at killing?
  24. @Anon
    Why wouldn't single women be interested in possessing a firearm for their own defense?

    Some of them are, but many are cowards and want Big Daddy Gov to do their dirty work for them. Ergo, 2nd Amendment rights are useless to them unless they are philosophically sophisticated enough to understand the “last defense against tyranny (tranny)” argument.

  25. Is there anything a man don’t stand to lose,
    when he lets a woman hold him in her hand?

  26. Oddly, that Crazy Ex-girlfriend video lacks diversity.

  27. @Anon
    Why wouldn't single women be interested in possessing a firearm for their own defense?

    99% fear of the unknown. Most antigun women can be encouraged to a range to at least try shooting. If that intro’s done properly (understanding her fear), near instant conversion.

    • Replies: @carol
    That would be me. A local R politician told me I should take a shooting course so I'd understand better, and I too beginning and intermediate classes. Then I really got into it, esp after I started shooting a Glock. Semi autos are much easier to shoot accurately with than revolvers.

    Having been single on my own for so many years, it was a Godsend. I shot in practical shooting competitions and helped out with new classes. I can't believe all the years I traveled alone as a tourign musician with no cell phone, no cruise control and no handgun.
  28. @ThreeCranes
    With her looks she could be taken for Rodney Dangerfield's sister (if he had one).

    http://www.rodney.com/images/bg/Jokes.jpg

    Beat me to it. Too on the nose.

  29. @Neoconned
    I remember in the mid 90s my redneck neighbor got a nasty divorce. Because a judge said so, he had to pay all utilities and the mortgage. His ex wife moved her Egyptian bf in and would send her two sons to the grandparents so she could party w Achmed.

    She ended up having a bastard daughter with Achmed who skipped the country and returned home.

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men.... palimony, alimony, child support, "she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage" and so forth.

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed.... or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don't want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men…. palimony, alimony, child support, “she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage” and so forth.

    Any man who gets married without a prenup gets what he deserves.

    • Replies: @L Woods
    All it takes is for a holier-than-thou judge to decide she was coerced/misled/whatever into signing it, and that's good for nothing too.
    , @Rosie
    How about you tell us exactly how you think divorce should be handled? I hear so much bellyaching about how men are hard done by, but no actual recommendations as to how to move forward.

    To break the ice, here are my thoughts on the matter.

    If you walk away unilaterally and without cause, you walk away with nothing. On the other hand, if your dependent spouse can prove that you are at fault for marital breakdown, you pay up. Alimony for life, or until she remarried, in law or in fact.

    Anyone else have any thoughts.
    , @Anonymous
    Prenups are often ruled unenforceable, is my understanding.
    , @MBlanc46
    A prenup is only worth what the judge says it’s worth.
  30. @njguy73

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men…. palimony, alimony, child support, “she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage” and so forth.
     
    Any man who gets married without a prenup gets what he deserves.

    All it takes is for a holier-than-thou judge to decide she was coerced/misled/whatever into signing it, and that’s good for nothing too.

  31. @Neoconned
    I remember in the mid 90s my redneck neighbor got a nasty divorce. Because a judge said so, he had to pay all utilities and the mortgage. His ex wife moved her Egyptian bf in and would send her two sons to the grandparents so she could party w Achmed.

    She ended up having a bastard daughter with Achmed who skipped the country and returned home.

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men.... palimony, alimony, child support, "she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage" and so forth.

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed.... or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don't want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives

    Your daily reminder that the demise of this disgusting order can’t come soon enough.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    Since you hate "this disgusting order," which of these would you like to see replace it? Or do you have something entirely novel in mind?

    http://stories.avvo.com/relationships/divorce/fivestrangedivorcelaws.html
    , @Neoconned
    At this point I'll almost welcome the caliphate to burn this system to the ground....
  32. @schnellandine
    99% fear of the unknown. Most antigun women can be encouraged to a range to at least try shooting. If that intro's done properly (understanding her fear), near instant conversion.

    That would be me. A local R politician told me I should take a shooting course so I’d understand better, and I too beginning and intermediate classes. Then I really got into it, esp after I started shooting a Glock. Semi autos are much easier to shoot accurately with than revolvers.

    Having been single on my own for so many years, it was a Godsend. I shot in practical shooting competitions and helped out with new classes. I can’t believe all the years I traveled alone as a tourign musician with no cell phone, no cruise control and no handgun.

    • Replies: @schnellandine
    One person spreading the word beats 10 passive NRA memberships. Good to hear.
    , @Buzz Mohawk
    Good for you.

    My wife grew up in a country in which gun ownership was forbidden. Funnily, in that same Communist country, all the girls and boys in school were taken to a shooting range periodically. So, my wife learned how to operate a military rifle when she was a schoolgirl!

    Now she is thinking about having a gun for herself, another freedom she didn't have before. She wants to be able to protect herself, but she is also well aware of some history in her old part of the world in which armed citizens, including women, played a role fighting for freedom.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Female_Soldier_of_the_Corvin_Passage.png
    http://78.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lsq573fhIY1qib0x9o1_500.jpg

    https://tmq2.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/distress-american-flag.gif
    , @Reg Cæsar

    ... with no cell phone, no cruise control and no handgun.
     
    Please, do not use any two of these at the same time.
  33. You’re all off-base. THIS is the leader of the modern Sisterhood:

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/28631/watch-twitter-erupts-after-parkland-student-makes-ryan-saavedra

    Tinkerbell here will show them the way.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    Re: The targeted attack on Senator Rubio in Florida

    One thing the Left is doing right now is using their anti-gun children's crusade to bring down the Republican Rubio so that voters in purple Florida will install a Democrat in the Senate. This is just one more little part of the game. Those usefully-idiotic children may help add one more Democrat vote to Congress while subtracting one Republican, for a net change of two more steps to the left.

  34. @Brutusale
    You're all off-base. THIS is the leader of the modern Sisterhood:

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/28631/watch-twitter-erupts-after-parkland-student-makes-ryan-saavedra

    Tinkerbell here will show them the way.

    Re: The targeted attack on Senator Rubio in Florida

    One thing the Left is doing right now is using their anti-gun children’s crusade to bring down the Republican Rubio so that voters in purple Florida will install a Democrat in the Senate. This is just one more little part of the game. Those usefully-idiotic children may help add one more Democrat vote to Congress while subtracting one Republican, for a net change of two more steps to the left.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

    a net change of two more steps to the left.
     
    Correction: one step left. The Senate would become one percent more Democrat, which under current circumstances might be just enough to take it away from the Republicans, depending on how other races go.

    We may be looking a both the House and the Senate going Democrat. That could conceivably mean not only impeachment for Trump, but also conviction.

  35. @Buzz Mohawk
    Re: The targeted attack on Senator Rubio in Florida

    One thing the Left is doing right now is using their anti-gun children's crusade to bring down the Republican Rubio so that voters in purple Florida will install a Democrat in the Senate. This is just one more little part of the game. Those usefully-idiotic children may help add one more Democrat vote to Congress while subtracting one Republican, for a net change of two more steps to the left.

    a net change of two more steps to the left.

    Correction: one step left. The Senate would become one percent more Democrat, which under current circumstances might be just enough to take it away from the Republicans, depending on how other races go.

    We may be looking a both the House and the Senate going Democrat. That could conceivably mean not only impeachment for Trump, but also conviction.

    • Replies: @prusmc
    I thought Little Marco was returned to the Senate in the 2016 election? Isn't it between a democrat shoo-in, Bill Nelson and Governor Rick Scott (who just acted to prompt me to sit the election out) ?
  36. @carol
    That would be me. A local R politician told me I should take a shooting course so I'd understand better, and I too beginning and intermediate classes. Then I really got into it, esp after I started shooting a Glock. Semi autos are much easier to shoot accurately with than revolvers.

    Having been single on my own for so many years, it was a Godsend. I shot in practical shooting competitions and helped out with new classes. I can't believe all the years I traveled alone as a tourign musician with no cell phone, no cruise control and no handgun.

    One person spreading the word beats 10 passive NRA memberships. Good to hear.

  37. @Anonymous
    For all women who love gun control:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5YDEu2JLVY

    The woman with the firearm was not given proper instructions on how to stand by the males standing by. Plus modeling is rough. They never talk about how many women are injured each year. I bet it is worse than football players.

  38. @carol
    That would be me. A local R politician told me I should take a shooting course so I'd understand better, and I too beginning and intermediate classes. Then I really got into it, esp after I started shooting a Glock. Semi autos are much easier to shoot accurately with than revolvers.

    Having been single on my own for so many years, it was a Godsend. I shot in practical shooting competitions and helped out with new classes. I can't believe all the years I traveled alone as a tourign musician with no cell phone, no cruise control and no handgun.

    Good for you.

    My wife grew up in a country in which gun ownership was forbidden. Funnily, in that same Communist country, all the girls and boys in school were taken to a shooting range periodically. So, my wife learned how to operate a military rifle when she was a schoolgirl!

    Now she is thinking about having a gun for herself, another freedom she didn’t have before. She wants to be able to protect herself, but she is also well aware of some history in her old part of the world in which armed citizens, including women, played a role fighting for freedom.

  39. Adam Schleshinger writes most/all music for the show. He was the brains behind two of my favorite bands; “Fountains of Wayne” and “Ivy”. A talented and brilliant guy.

    This song about football (!) was one of my favorites.

    (And sure, I loved “Stacy’s Mom”, too.)

  40. After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed…. or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don’t want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives

    Spot-on. I live in a small town that’s 98.6% white. The people here are heavily armed, and there’s three gun clubs. Violent street crime is non-existent. Home invasions are non-existent. Black-on-white crime is non-existent. In the 27 years I’ve been here the only homicides have been two murder-suicides of married couples breaking up.

    Women know this, and the feminized legal system has completely stripped men of any due process. The slightest accusation against a man, or even a pro forma order of protection in an ordinary divorce results in immediate confiscation of all guns so that she can empty the bank account and go off and bang some other guy with impunity.

    • Replies: @L Woods
    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because...why again? As much as I’d miss beer...
  41. @syonredux
    Speaking of failures in female solidarity,,,,,

    Seven men have been found guilty of grooming and sexually abusing teenage girls "on a massive scale" in Oxford.

     


    The gang was convicted of more than 20 offences including rape and indecent assault between 1998 and 2005.
     

    Prosecutor Oliver Saxby QC said they carried out the "routine, cynical and predatory sexual exploitation" of vulnerable girls who were groomed with alcohol and drugs.

     


    Assad Hussain, 37, of Iffley Road, Oxford, guilty of five counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault, not guilty of one count of indecent assault.
    Kameer Iqbal, 39, of Dashwood Road, Oxford, guilty of three counts of rape.
    Khalid Hussain, 38, of Ashhurst Way, Oxford, guilty of rape and indecent assault, not guilty of one count of rape.
    Kamran Khan, 36, of Northfield Road, Bolton, guilty of indecent assault and false imprisonment, not guilty of rape.
    Moinul Islam, 41, of Wykeham Crescent, Oxford, guilty of rape, two counts of indecent assault and supplying cannabis, not guilty of false imprisonment.
    Raheem Ahmed, 40 of Starwort Path, Oxford, guilty of two counts of indecent assault and false imprisonment, not guilty of rape.
    Alladitta Yousaf, 48, of Bodley Road, Oxford, guilty of indecent assault.
     
    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-41608602


    https://twitter.com/KTHopkins/status/978020151596650497

    “Mostly Sagittarius”!! I’m howling. LOL!

  42. @DFH
    I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting.

    @21 DFH: “I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting.”

    I’ve seen this assertion before but I disagree. The vast majority of top shooters are men – and that’s not merely because far fewer women shoot.

    What I think more likely is that women are more ignorant of guns in general and so have fewer bad habits to unlearn – plus nothing to prove to any friends – so no cocky attitude and more open to instruction. I knew just how ignorant I was when I was learning to shoot, plus I didn’t want to deal with my son’s scorn, so I paid close attention and he was surprisingly patient.

    We went to the range again just last week – first time I’d gone in a few months. I actually did quite well – but that was definitely the result of doubling up on hearing protection. I’m not afraid of weapons, but the blast is always louder than I expect and I was tensing up in anticipation, and thus jerking the trigger. With extra hearing protection I was far more relaxed, and really focused on squeezing the trigger. Two to the chest, one to the head . Nice grouping on the first, merely singed the ear a few times on the second but the rest went right where I intended. Made me proud of myself!

    • Replies: @DFH
    I was cautious about stating it since I know the vast majority of competitive shooters are men.

    But (purely anecdotally), I used to shoot at school nad I would see women starting off very consistnetly score higher than men. Women also made up at least half of the team (the highest ranking shooters) despite being on average much less interested in the sport. This was in the UK where it was highly unlikely that either sex had touched a gun before.
  43. @Anonymous
    Related:

    PUSH: The topic of oral cancer risk as a result of oral sex with HPV-positive females has been getting exposure in the media.

    PUSHBACK: Top film star (Hunger Games chick) does interview claiming she's a germophobe and "dick is dangerous"...

    Carpet-munching Hunger Games chick is probably HPV-positive, so it doesn’t matter…

  44. @Macumazahn
    I think I've seen that photo before, perhaps it was when I looked up the word "barhog" in the dictionary.

    Or beached whale…

  45. @CCZ
    I know that my observations are not "proven" by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is "happening" between males and females!!

    I know that my observations are not “proven” by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is “happening” between males and females!!

    Not only are your observations not proven, but in fact a majority of White women almost always vote for Republicans despite their excellent record on gun rights. The most you can say is that most people who are passionately anti-gun are women, and that doesn’t mean most White women are anti-gun.

  46. @syonredux
    Speaking of failures in female solidarity,,,,,

    Seven men have been found guilty of grooming and sexually abusing teenage girls "on a massive scale" in Oxford.

     


    The gang was convicted of more than 20 offences including rape and indecent assault between 1998 and 2005.
     

    Prosecutor Oliver Saxby QC said they carried out the "routine, cynical and predatory sexual exploitation" of vulnerable girls who were groomed with alcohol and drugs.

     


    Assad Hussain, 37, of Iffley Road, Oxford, guilty of five counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault, not guilty of one count of indecent assault.
    Kameer Iqbal, 39, of Dashwood Road, Oxford, guilty of three counts of rape.
    Khalid Hussain, 38, of Ashhurst Way, Oxford, guilty of rape and indecent assault, not guilty of one count of rape.
    Kamran Khan, 36, of Northfield Road, Bolton, guilty of indecent assault and false imprisonment, not guilty of rape.
    Moinul Islam, 41, of Wykeham Crescent, Oxford, guilty of rape, two counts of indecent assault and supplying cannabis, not guilty of false imprisonment.
    Raheem Ahmed, 40 of Starwort Path, Oxford, guilty of two counts of indecent assault and false imprisonment, not guilty of rape.
    Alladitta Yousaf, 48, of Bodley Road, Oxford, guilty of indecent assault.
     
    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-41608602


    https://twitter.com/KTHopkins/status/978020151596650497

    As I mentioned in another thread, if a White billlionaire was offering to fund protests against grooming gangs, I assure you he could get thousands of heels on the ground. He who pays the piper all the tune, and the so-called “feminist movement” is no exception.

  47. @Neoconned
    I remember in the mid 90s my redneck neighbor got a nasty divorce. Because a judge said so, he had to pay all utilities and the mortgage. His ex wife moved her Egyptian bf in and would send her two sons to the grandparents so she could party w Achmed.

    She ended up having a bastard daughter with Achmed who skipped the country and returned home.

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men.... palimony, alimony, child support, "she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage" and so forth.

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed.... or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don't want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed…. or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don’t want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives

    I suppose there may be some truth to this in rare cases, but the truth of the matter is that the oligarchs want men disarmed so they can’t avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration.

    • Replies: @dfordoom

    but the truth of the matter is that the oligarchs want men disarmed so they can’t avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration.
     
    I don't think so. The oligarchs know that the chances of ordinary people taking any kind of action (whether violent or non-violent) to avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration are zero.

    I honestly don't think the elites worry very much about guns. Why should they? They own the police and the military and they could crush any armed insurrection within 24 hours. What the gun issue offers them is a wonderful weapon to use against the people they hate. And it's a great way to energise their own supporters.

    I do think that a great many feminists do like the idea of the state having a monopoly on guns because they know the state will always be on their side against men.
  48. @njguy73

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men…. palimony, alimony, child support, “she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage” and so forth.
     
    Any man who gets married without a prenup gets what he deserves.

    How about you tell us exactly how you think divorce should be handled? I hear so much bellyaching about how men are hard done by, but no actual recommendations as to how to move forward.

    To break the ice, here are my thoughts on the matter.

    If you walk away unilaterally and without cause, you walk away with nothing. On the other hand, if your dependent spouse can prove that you are at fault for marital breakdown, you pay up. Alimony for life, or until she remarried, in law or in fact.

    Anyone else have any thoughts.

    • Replies: @dfordoom

    How about you tell us exactly how you think divorce should be handled?
     
    We should simply go back to the marriage and divorce laws as they existed in the early 20th century.
  49. @Anon
    Why wouldn't single women be interested in possessing a firearm for their own defense?

    I’m not single, but I didn’t own one when I was, not because of a lack of philosophical sophistication but rather a bit too much of it. A moment of paralysis by analysis and the bad guy, who is already bigger and stronger than you, gets the gun.

    On the other hand, a neighbor with a gun can definitely bring peace of mind. Just because a particular single woman chooses not to have a gun herself doesn’t mean she doesn’t appreciate the importance of guns and men who are willing to use them.

  50. @CCZ
    I know that my observations are not "proven" by a strict statistical tabulation, but, in all of the photographs that I have seen (hundreds) of the anti-gun protests, at perhaps 50 or 60 different locations, I continue to see far more females than males. In numerous photographs not a single male is seen and in many others very few males are visible. And in all of the others, females clearly outnumber males and are a perhaps 60%+ majority of the participants. Even in overhead photographs, a majority of females is visible. Something is "happening" between males and females!!

    Women are socialized into being wimps except in redneckland and the inner city.

    Irony is, people on the alt right are always complaining that the issue with women is that they aren’t feminine enough, but the gun-grabbers are very stereotypically feminine in attitude (if not appearance.)

  51. @L Woods
    Your daily reminder that the demise of this disgusting order can't come soon enough.

    Since you hate “this disgusting order,” which of these would you like to see replace it? Or do you have something entirely novel in mind?

    http://stories.avvo.com/relationships/divorce/fivestrangedivorcelaws.html

    • Replies: @dfordoom

    Since you hate “this disgusting order,” which of these would you like to see replace it?
     
    The systems in the Philippines, Malta and Chile all sound pretty good.
  52. @Bryan
    With respect to the guns, I figure it's unattached women who are anti-gun. Right? On average over-indexing single is what I mean.

    Normal women are fine with their husbands knowing how to use firearms; the expect their husbands to know stuff like that. My wife gets irritated if I don't carry when we go out, wants a gun by my side of the bed, all that.

    That same behavior becomes threatening when you don't have prospects of getting your own man. In that case the implicit violence of a gun is never going to be something that serves your interests; it can only ever be a threat. These women are married to the State and want the state to play the protector role.

    Last time I looked online, maybe 10 years ago, there was a survey showing that even among women gun-owners, they tended to be more supportive of stricter gun-control laws than gun-owning men. It’s a female psychology thing.

  53. Beta fanbois everywhere.

  54. @Buzz Mohawk

    a net change of two more steps to the left.
     
    Correction: one step left. The Senate would become one percent more Democrat, which under current circumstances might be just enough to take it away from the Republicans, depending on how other races go.

    We may be looking a both the House and the Senate going Democrat. That could conceivably mean not only impeachment for Trump, but also conviction.

    I thought Little Marco was returned to the Senate in the 2016 election? Isn’t it between a democrat shoo-in, Bill Nelson and Governor Rick Scott (who just acted to prompt me to sit the election out) ?

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    You're right. No chance to unseat Marco until 2022. That changes the idea somewhat. Does the Left still see him as some kind of long term threat? They sure do have the Children's Crusade going after him. Maybe they think they can bend him to their will.
  55. @Dr. X

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed…. or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don’t want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives
     
    Spot-on. I live in a small town that's 98.6% white. The people here are heavily armed, and there's three gun clubs. Violent street crime is non-existent. Home invasions are non-existent. Black-on-white crime is non-existent. In the 27 years I've been here the only homicides have been two murder-suicides of married couples breaking up.

    Women know this, and the feminized legal system has completely stripped men of any due process. The slightest accusation against a man, or even a pro forma order of protection in an ordinary divorce results in immediate confiscation of all guns so that she can empty the bank account and go off and bang some other guy with impunity.

    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because…why again? As much as I’d miss beer…

    • Replies: @Rosie

    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because…why again? As much as I’d miss beer…
     
    Then Rosie approached L Woods and said: “Will you enslave the righteous with the wicked? What if there are a few hundred thousand righteous White women in Alabama?"

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2017-election/AL
    , @Anonymous

    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because…why again?
     
    Maybe the part where your sisters, daughters, mother, etc. can be raped with essentially legal impunity? (2x more female "witnesses" to a rape needed than male, to convict)
    Of course you are then encouraged to extract extrajudicial revenge yourself from the perp's family, but then he can get it from yours, and on the cycle goes. Are you that tough?
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    I am not giving up beer. You can convert and move to one of the 58 Muslim countries that share your values.
  56. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/cosmo-pulled-wal-mart-shelves-1097811

    Then they came for the Cosmo quiz, and I said nothing, because I was not a fun, fearless female…

  57. @prusmc
    I thought Little Marco was returned to the Senate in the 2016 election? Isn't it between a democrat shoo-in, Bill Nelson and Governor Rick Scott (who just acted to prompt me to sit the election out) ?

    You’re right. No chance to unseat Marco until 2022. That changes the idea somewhat. Does the Left still see him as some kind of long term threat? They sure do have the Children’s Crusade going after him. Maybe they think they can bend him to their will.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Maybe they think they can bend him to their will.
     
    Marco is dumb and pliable, so there is a good chance they can.
    , @snorlax

    Maybe they think they can bend him to their will.
     
    That; they strategically target the squishiest to get them to, er, squish.

    Or, they may be softening him up as preparation before dropping a bigger scandal. A related tactic we're seeing more and more often is "will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" — NYT et al run hourly two-minute's hates on someone they want purged (Trump, Travis Kalanick, James Woods, John Kelly, etc) until a scandal or guilt-by-association scandal, typically ex-girlfriend or sexual harassment-related, appears, like magic!
  58. @Buzz Mohawk
    You're right. No chance to unseat Marco until 2022. That changes the idea somewhat. Does the Left still see him as some kind of long term threat? They sure do have the Children's Crusade going after him. Maybe they think they can bend him to their will.

    Maybe they think they can bend him to their will.

    Marco is dumb and pliable, so there is a good chance they can.

  59. @carol
    That would be me. A local R politician told me I should take a shooting course so I'd understand better, and I too beginning and intermediate classes. Then I really got into it, esp after I started shooting a Glock. Semi autos are much easier to shoot accurately with than revolvers.

    Having been single on my own for so many years, it was a Godsend. I shot in practical shooting competitions and helped out with new classes. I can't believe all the years I traveled alone as a tourign musician with no cell phone, no cruise control and no handgun.

    … with no cell phone, no cruise control and no handgun.

    Please, do not use any two of these at the same time.

  60. @L Woods
    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because...why again? As much as I’d miss beer...

    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because…why again? As much as I’d miss beer…

    Then Rosie approached L Woods and said: “Will you enslave the righteous with the wicked? What if there are a few hundred thousand righteous White women in Alabama?”

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2017-election/AL

    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    Hmm. I am unsure that I am following you here. Did you vote for Doug Jones?
  61. A moment of paralysis by analysis and the bad guy, who is already bigger and stronger than you, gets the gun.

    I’ve heard that argument multiple times and frankly I don’t get it. The gun is the “great equalizer.” An analogy could be applied to a weaker man getting attacked by a bigger, stronger man, but I’ve never heard a man use this argument, only women. Besides, once you start using and carrying guns, you become acutely aware of the fact that the gun is not a “cure all” and that unless you have situational awareness and a defensive perimeter beyond your immediate physical space it may not be effective.

    I think he answer, simply, is that women are by nature herd animals who want to be protected by the shepherd, while men are either pack animals or individuals.

    • Replies: @Rosie

    I’ve heard that argument multiple times and frankly I don’t get it. The gun is the “great equalizer.”
     
    Don't misunderstand. I'm not making an argument. I'm just being realistic about myself. I think there is a very good chance I would hesitate. I'm not saying other girls should avoid guns if they trust themselves to pull the trig trigger at the right time.
  62. @njguy73

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men…. palimony, alimony, child support, “she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage” and so forth.
     
    Any man who gets married without a prenup gets what he deserves.

    Prenups are often ruled unenforceable, is my understanding.

  63. Anonymous[612] • Disclaimer says:
    @L Woods
    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because...why again? As much as I’d miss beer...

    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because…why again?

    Maybe the part where your sisters, daughters, mother, etc. can be raped with essentially legal impunity? (2x more female “witnesses” to a rape needed than male, to convict)
    Of course you are then encouraged to extract extrajudicial revenge yourself from the perp’s family, but then he can get it from yours, and on the cycle goes. Are you that tough?

    • Replies: @Brutusale
    Or by family agreement. This one hit the press recently.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5544481/Rapist-let-agreeing-allow-sister-raped-victims-brother-Pakistan.html
  64. The Jews do know satire, as the producers of this amusement are Adam Schlesinger & Steven M. Gold.

  65. @Dr. X

    A moment of paralysis by analysis and the bad guy, who is already bigger and stronger than you, gets the gun.
     
    I've heard that argument multiple times and frankly I don't get it. The gun is the "great equalizer." An analogy could be applied to a weaker man getting attacked by a bigger, stronger man, but I've never heard a man use this argument, only women. Besides, once you start using and carrying guns, you become acutely aware of the fact that the gun is not a "cure all" and that unless you have situational awareness and a defensive perimeter beyond your immediate physical space it may not be effective.

    I think he answer, simply, is that women are by nature herd animals who want to be protected by the shepherd, while men are either pack animals or individuals.

    I’ve heard that argument multiple times and frankly I don’t get it. The gun is the “great equalizer.”

    Don’t misunderstand. I’m not making an argument. I’m just being realistic about myself. I think there is a very good chance I would hesitate. I’m not saying other girls should avoid guns if they trust themselves to pull the trig trigger at the right time.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    We really ought to strive for a society in which our womenfolk don't have to personally shoot muggers and home invaders too often.
  66. @Rosie

    I’ve heard that argument multiple times and frankly I don’t get it. The gun is the “great equalizer.”
     
    Don't misunderstand. I'm not making an argument. I'm just being realistic about myself. I think there is a very good chance I would hesitate. I'm not saying other girls should avoid guns if they trust themselves to pull the trig trigger at the right time.

    We really ought to strive for a society in which our womenfolk don’t have to personally shoot muggers and home invaders too often.

    • LOL: Rosie
  67. @Buzz Mohawk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qzz6m5HIwI

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/02/16/21/494C7BC200000578-5401669-image-m-49_1518817061529.jpg

    She had got to be Jewish.

  68. @Rosie

    After they clean them out they rightfully fear retaliation and so disarming the men they scam and fleece of their livelihood they want them disarmed…. or when they leave their husbands and kids for Shtavius during their quarter life crisis they don’t want their ex to be able to blow their brains out for screwing up their lives
     
    I suppose there may be some truth to this in rare cases, but the truth of the matter is that the oligarchs want men disarmed so they can't avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration.

    but the truth of the matter is that the oligarchs want men disarmed so they can’t avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration.

    I don’t think so. The oligarchs know that the chances of ordinary people taking any kind of action (whether violent or non-violent) to avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration are zero.

    I honestly don’t think the elites worry very much about guns. Why should they? They own the police and the military and they could crush any armed insurrection within 24 hours. What the gun issue offers them is a wonderful weapon to use against the people they hate. And it’s a great way to energise their own supporters.

    I do think that a great many feminists do like the idea of the state having a monopoly on guns because they know the state will always be on their side against men.

    • Replies: @Rosie

    I do think that a great many feminists do like the idea of the state having a monopoly on guns because they know the state will always be on their side against men.
     
    I see that you think the feminist movement exists independently of the oligarchs. It does not. When you see feminists on TV caring about something, you are seeing what they have been told to care about by their paymasters. Trust me. The world will make a great deal more sense to you once you see this.

    I honestly don’t think the elites worry very much about guns. Why should they? They own the police and the military and they could crush any armed insurrection within 24 hours.
     
    Weren't we supposed to be in and out of Iraq in a couple of weeks or something?
    , @Rosie
    Rather than speculating, I should have just done some research.

    "Student organizers from Never Again MSD planned the march in collaboration with the nonprofit organization Everytown for Gun Safety.[8]"

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_for_Our_Lives

    And what is Everytown for Gun Safety?

    "Everytown was founded in 2014, combining 'Mayors Against Illegal Guns' and 'Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America'.[5] Everytown for Gun Safety is largely bankrolled by Michael Bloomberg,[6] who also founded the group.[7]"

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everytown_for_Gun_Safety

    Michael Bloomberg

  69. @Macumazahn
    I think I've seen that photo before, perhaps it was when I looked up the word "barhog" in the dictionary.

    In my callow youth in the Midwest the term we used was “moonpig.”

  70. @Rosie
    How about you tell us exactly how you think divorce should be handled? I hear so much bellyaching about how men are hard done by, but no actual recommendations as to how to move forward.

    To break the ice, here are my thoughts on the matter.

    If you walk away unilaterally and without cause, you walk away with nothing. On the other hand, if your dependent spouse can prove that you are at fault for marital breakdown, you pay up. Alimony for life, or until she remarried, in law or in fact.

    Anyone else have any thoughts.

    How about you tell us exactly how you think divorce should be handled?

    We should simply go back to the marriage and divorce laws as they existed in the early 20th century.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    Well thank you for that. I'll do some reading.
  71. @3g4me
    @21 DFH: "I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting."

    I've seen this assertion before but I disagree. The vast majority of top shooters are men - and that's not merely because far fewer women shoot.

    What I think more likely is that women are more ignorant of guns in general and so have fewer bad habits to unlearn - plus nothing to prove to any friends - so no cocky attitude and more open to instruction. I knew just how ignorant I was when I was learning to shoot, plus I didn't want to deal with my son's scorn, so I paid close attention and he was surprisingly patient.

    We went to the range again just last week - first time I'd gone in a few months. I actually did quite well - but that was definitely the result of doubling up on hearing protection. I'm not afraid of weapons, but the blast is always louder than I expect and I was tensing up in anticipation, and thus jerking the trigger. With extra hearing protection I was far more relaxed, and really focused on squeezing the trigger. Two to the chest, one to the head . Nice grouping on the first, merely singed the ear a few times on the second but the rest went right where I intended. Made me proud of myself!

    I was cautious about stating it since I know the vast majority of competitive shooters are men.

    But (purely anecdotally), I used to shoot at school nad I would see women starting off very consistnetly score higher than men. Women also made up at least half of the team (the highest ranking shooters) despite being on average much less interested in the sport. This was in the UK where it was highly unlikely that either sex had touched a gun before.

  72. @Rosie
    Since you hate "this disgusting order," which of these would you like to see replace it? Or do you have something entirely novel in mind?

    http://stories.avvo.com/relationships/divorce/fivestrangedivorcelaws.html

    Since you hate “this disgusting order,” which of these would you like to see replace it?

    The systems in the Philippines, Malta and Chile all sound pretty good.

    • Agree: Rosie
  73. @DFH
    I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting.

    I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting.

    Maybe, but do you think they could be better than “White Feather” at killing?

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Women won some Olympic shooting gold medals when they briefly eliminated separate men's and women's events in the Olympics. Then the men asked to go back to separate.
  74. “So if some weird troll named Rebecca moves here from New York and is all up on my boyfriend”

    The joke being that the singer herself is that weird troll from New York. That is, this song is exactly the sort of passive-aggressive female bullshit that it ostensibly parodies.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    "The joke being that the singer herself is that weird troll from New York."

    No. The singer is Valencia and she's referring to the title character of "Crazy Ex-Girlfriend."

  75. @L Woods
    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because...why again? As much as I’d miss beer...

    I am not giving up beer. You can convert and move to one of the 58 Muslim countries that share your values.

  76. @Rosie

    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because…why again? As much as I’d miss beer…
     
    Then Rosie approached L Woods and said: “Will you enslave the righteous with the wicked? What if there are a few hundred thousand righteous White women in Alabama?"

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2017-election/AL

    Hmm. I am unsure that I am following you here. Did you vote for Doug Jones?

    • Replies: @Rosie
    H

    mm. I am unsure that I am following you here. Did you vote for Doug Jones?
     
    Lol No. See Genesis 18:20-26.
  77. @Dave from Oz
    "So if some weird troll named Rebecca moves here from New York and is all up on my boyfriend"

    The joke being that the singer herself is that weird troll from New York. That is, this song is exactly the sort of passive-aggressive female bullshit that it ostensibly parodies.

    “The joke being that the singer herself is that weird troll from New York.”

    No. The singer is Valencia and she’s referring to the title character of “Crazy Ex-Girlfriend.”

  78. @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    I think women are actually naturally better than men at target shooting.
     
    Maybe, but do you think they could be better than "White Feather" at killing?

    Women won some Olympic shooting gold medals when they briefly eliminated separate men’s and women’s events in the Olympics. Then the men asked to go back to separate.

  79. @dfordoom

    How about you tell us exactly how you think divorce should be handled?
     
    We should simply go back to the marriage and divorce laws as they existed in the early 20th century.

    Well thank you for that. I’ll do some reading.

  80. @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    Hmm. I am unsure that I am following you here. Did you vote for Doug Jones?

    H

    mm. I am unsure that I am following you here. Did you vote for Doug Jones?

    Lol No. See Genesis 18:20-26.

  81. @dfordoom

    but the truth of the matter is that the oligarchs want men disarmed so they can’t avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration.
     
    I don't think so. The oligarchs know that the chances of ordinary people taking any kind of action (whether violent or non-violent) to avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration are zero.

    I honestly don't think the elites worry very much about guns. Why should they? They own the police and the military and they could crush any armed insurrection within 24 hours. What the gun issue offers them is a wonderful weapon to use against the people they hate. And it's a great way to energise their own supporters.

    I do think that a great many feminists do like the idea of the state having a monopoly on guns because they know the state will always be on their side against men.

    I do think that a great many feminists do like the idea of the state having a monopoly on guns because they know the state will always be on their side against men.

    I see that you think the feminist movement exists independently of the oligarchs. It does not. When you see feminists on TV caring about something, you are seeing what they have been told to care about by their paymasters. Trust me. The world will make a great deal more sense to you once you see this.

    I honestly don’t think the elites worry very much about guns. Why should they? They own the police and the military and they could crush any armed insurrection within 24 hours.

    Weren’t we supposed to be in and out of Iraq in a couple of weeks or something?

  82. @dfordoom

    but the truth of the matter is that the oligarchs want men disarmed so they can’t avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration.
     
    I don't think so. The oligarchs know that the chances of ordinary people taking any kind of action (whether violent or non-violent) to avenge the destruction of their livelihoods with outsourcing and out-of-control immigration are zero.

    I honestly don't think the elites worry very much about guns. Why should they? They own the police and the military and they could crush any armed insurrection within 24 hours. What the gun issue offers them is a wonderful weapon to use against the people they hate. And it's a great way to energise their own supporters.

    I do think that a great many feminists do like the idea of the state having a monopoly on guns because they know the state will always be on their side against men.

    Rather than speculating, I should have just done some research.

    “Student organizers from Never Again MSD planned the march in collaboration with the nonprofit organization Everytown for Gun Safety.[8]”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_for_Our_Lives

    And what is Everytown for Gun Safety?

    “Everytown was founded in 2014, combining ‘Mayors Against Illegal Guns’ and ‘Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America’.[5] Everytown for Gun Safety is largely bankrolled by Michael Bloomberg,[6] who also founded the group.[7]”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everytown_for_Gun_Safety

    Michael Bloomberg

  83. @Buzz Mohawk
    You're right. No chance to unseat Marco until 2022. That changes the idea somewhat. Does the Left still see him as some kind of long term threat? They sure do have the Children's Crusade going after him. Maybe they think they can bend him to their will.

    Maybe they think they can bend him to their will.

    That; they strategically target the squishiest to get them to, er, squish.

    Or, they may be softening him up as preparation before dropping a bigger scandal. A related tactic we’re seeing more and more often is “will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?” — NYT et al run hourly two-minute’s hates on someone they want purged (Trump, Travis Kalanick, James Woods, John Kelly, etc) until a scandal or guilt-by-association scandal, typically ex-girlfriend or sexual harassment-related, appears, like magic!

  84. @ThreeCranes
    With her looks she could be taken for Rodney Dangerfield's sister (if he had one).

    http://www.rodney.com/images/bg/Jokes.jpg

    Thanks, Cranes. Just a *picture* of that guy gets me laughing. I saw Rodney perform in Atlantic City years ago, and I was on the floor from the second he set foot on the stage.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    One of my few regrets in life is not going to see Rodney Dangerfield live.

    Wanna make $14 the hard way? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dgxzItaQzw. Start at 0:30.
  85. @syonredux
    Speaking of failures in female solidarity,,,,,

    Seven men have been found guilty of grooming and sexually abusing teenage girls "on a massive scale" in Oxford.

     


    The gang was convicted of more than 20 offences including rape and indecent assault between 1998 and 2005.
     

    Prosecutor Oliver Saxby QC said they carried out the "routine, cynical and predatory sexual exploitation" of vulnerable girls who were groomed with alcohol and drugs.

     


    Assad Hussain, 37, of Iffley Road, Oxford, guilty of five counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault, not guilty of one count of indecent assault.
    Kameer Iqbal, 39, of Dashwood Road, Oxford, guilty of three counts of rape.
    Khalid Hussain, 38, of Ashhurst Way, Oxford, guilty of rape and indecent assault, not guilty of one count of rape.
    Kamran Khan, 36, of Northfield Road, Bolton, guilty of indecent assault and false imprisonment, not guilty of rape.
    Moinul Islam, 41, of Wykeham Crescent, Oxford, guilty of rape, two counts of indecent assault and supplying cannabis, not guilty of false imprisonment.
    Raheem Ahmed, 40 of Starwort Path, Oxford, guilty of two counts of indecent assault and false imprisonment, not guilty of rape.
    Alladitta Yousaf, 48, of Bodley Road, Oxford, guilty of indecent assault.
     
    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-41608602


    https://twitter.com/KTHopkins/status/978020151596650497

    Rowing club members they are definitely not.

  86. @L Woods
    Your daily reminder that the demise of this disgusting order can't come soon enough.

    At this point I’ll almost welcome the caliphate to burn this system to the ground….

    • Replies: @Rosie

    At this point I’ll almost welcome the caliphate to burn this system to the ground….
     
    I understand this is a common sentiment among MGTOWs, which is why I don't understand why the alt-Right tolerates your presence in the ranks.
  87. @ChrisZ
    Thanks, Cranes. Just a *picture* of that guy gets me laughing. I saw Rodney perform in Atlantic City years ago, and I was on the floor from the second he set foot on the stage.

    One of my few regrets in life is not going to see Rodney Dangerfield live.

    Wanna make $14 the hard way? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dgxzItaQzw. Start at 0:30.

    • Replies: @ChrisZ
    I use that line all the time. :)
  88. @Anonymous

    And we’re anti-Shariah around these parts because…why again?
     
    Maybe the part where your sisters, daughters, mother, etc. can be raped with essentially legal impunity? (2x more female "witnesses" to a rape needed than male, to convict)
    Of course you are then encouraged to extract extrajudicial revenge yourself from the perp's family, but then he can get it from yours, and on the cycle goes. Are you that tough?
  89. @Jim Don Bob
    One of my few regrets in life is not going to see Rodney Dangerfield live.

    Wanna make $14 the hard way? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dgxzItaQzw. Start at 0:30.

    I use that line all the time. 🙂

  90. @Neoconned
    At this point I'll almost welcome the caliphate to burn this system to the ground....

    At this point I’ll almost welcome the caliphate to burn this system to the ground….

    I understand this is a common sentiment among MGTOWs, which is why I don’t understand why the alt-Right tolerates your presence in the ranks.

    • Replies: @Neoconned
    I'm not necessarily "alt right" nor do I even really like the term as Hillary and her writers largely invented it out of thin air....
  91. @Rosie

    At this point I’ll almost welcome the caliphate to burn this system to the ground….
     
    I understand this is a common sentiment among MGTOWs, which is why I don't understand why the alt-Right tolerates your presence in the ranks.

    I’m not necessarily “alt right” nor do I even really like the term as Hillary and her writers largely invented it out of thin air….

  92. @Whiskey
    Women are the natural and eternal enemy of the Beta White male. Which is 90% easily of White men.

    Women HATE HATE HATE guns ... in the hands of beta males. Because it equalizes the equation between a Reginald Denny and a Damien "Football" Williams. Imagine if Denny had a gun that day, not even a high capacity, and we saw on live TV not Damien "Football" Willams bashing Denny's head in with a brick, over and over again, laughing (as millions of women get ... excited over the dominance) but rather shot instead?

    That would upset the "natural order of dominance" that single, unmarried, and Upper Class women (regardless of marital status) want -- the dominance of a few Alpha White males and the thuggery of various non Whites.

    If there is one thing White women HATE HATE HATE its beta males being "uppity" and defending themselves, as much as they love love love displays of dominance by non White males with natural low IQs. Heck the Rotherham/Telford child rape and forced prostitution scandals just make Muslim men more dominant. Unfortunately women are just hard-wired to find dominance arousing the way men find a shapely young woman arousing. Neither sex can do anything about it and the mass female driven consumer market dominates in turn men in a vicious cycle. Men don't buy much consumer goods, advertising in both people and product becomes more female centric, repeat until the soy boi latte drinking gay guy is figured to be too testosterone laden.

    Why would a woman want an ordinary man armed any more than she'd want him able to drink, or be able to do drugs, or watch pr0n, or ride a motorcycle, or anything like that! Save the polar bears, outlaw the internal combustion engine, Harley Davidson, guns, booze, pictures of pretty women, its all the same. From Temperance to Gun Control -- the war of Women on Men, White people edition.

    This is perhaps a bit over the top. But the basic picture is accurate

  93. @njguy73

    My point? A lotta women use the police and courts to clean out men…. palimony, alimony, child support, “she keeps the house and the court orders he must pay the mortgage” and so forth.
     
    Any man who gets married without a prenup gets what he deserves.

    A prenup is only worth what the judge says it’s worth.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS