The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 iSteve BlogTeasers
EU Parliament President: African Exodus to Europe Threatens Disaster of "Biblical Proportions"
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

From the Daily Mail:

Europe is ‘underestimating’ scale of migrant crisis and could be flooded by millions of Africans in ‘biblical exodus’ unless urgent action is taken says top official

Antonio Tajani said the severity of the migrant crisis is being underestimated

European Parliament president called on urgent action to confront problem

By Rory Tingle For Mailonline
PUBLISHED: 19:46 EDT, 7 July 2017 | UPDATED: 13:31 EDT, 8 July 2017

Antonio Tajani, president of the European Parliament, has said the scale and severity of the migrant crisis is being underestimated

The number of migrants crossing into Europe from Africa will be in the millions within five years unless urgent action is taken, a senior EU official has warned.

Antonio Tajani, president of the European Parliament, has said the scale and severity of the migrant crisis is being underestimated and must be tackled urgently.

In an interview with Il Messagero newspaper, Mr Tajani said there would be an exodus ‘of biblical proportions that would be impossible to stop if we don’t confront the problem now’.

‘Population growth, climate change, desertification, wars, famine in Somalia and Sudan. These are the factors that are forcing people to leave.

‘When people lose hope, they risk crossing the Sahara and the Mediterranean because it is worse to stay at home, where they run enormous risks. If we don’t confront this soon, we will find ourselves with millions of people on our doorstep within five years.

‘Today we are trying to solve a problem of a few thousand people, but we need to have a strategy for millions of people.’

News footage:

 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
    []
  1. That Tajani fellow is either dishonest or a fool. It isn’t those without any hope who are trying to cross over into Europe – it’s mostly young men who manage to scrounge together enough money (often thousands of dollars) for the journey. The image of desperate famished refugees fleeing for Europe because their lives are in danger is a fantasy.
    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn’t some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it’s actively enabled by Europe’s worthless and treasonous political class.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kylie
    I read somewhere that the media deliberately take photos and videos that make it appear these invasive migrants are mostly women and children. The number of teen-aged and adult males is minimized as much as possible.
    , @Diversity Heretic
    Good comment. What's lacking is the political will to stop the invasion because elites benefit from it (or think they do).
    , @Sean
    According to Paul Collier in Exodus, at present it is mainly the relatively well to to who can afford to immigrate but immigration is best seen as an investment, the cost of whichis greatly reduced by diaspora, so immigration will naturally accelerate as the more and more prospective immigrants can count on help from relatives already in the West. Eventually it will indeed begin to take in even the poorer Africans a nd women and children.
    , @Olorin
    Look at the history of people trafficking.

    It's always been lucrative.
    , @Anonymous
    The EU doing what it does best: funding a "media project across national borders". They're "successful" coming together to erode Europe's borders with the rest of the world:

    http://www.dw.com/en/pope-francis-praises-dw-infomigrants-news-service-as-austria-moves-to-control-border/a-39537251


    Pope Francis has sent a message to the InfoMigrants.net portal, a joint project of DW, Italy's ANSA and France's Media Monde. ...

    "I am close with affection and encouragement to those institutions, associations and individuals who open up wisely to the migratory phenomenon with interventions of support, bearing witness to the human and Christian values that are the base of European civilization," Pope Francis said.

    The Infomigrants portal, co-financed by the European Union, is published in French, Arabic and English and is aimed at migrants "to counter misinformation at every point of their journey," ...

    ... Responding to the papal message, DW Director General Peter Limbourg said: "We are pleased to receive the encouragement of the Holy Father," and added: "We can not be indifferent to the fate of millions of refugees and migrants."

    Limbourg emphasized that InfoMigrants was not a refugee aid project but a channel for news and factual information: "With InfoMigrants we have succeeded in launching a European media project across national borders," Limbourg said. "We want to help people but also to educate them about the dangers and indicate the route to legal migration."
     

    Sample InfoMigrants.net stories:

    For this Syrian refugee in Germany, an apprenticeship makes all the difference

    Afousatou, a rebellious woman from the Ivory Coast who dreamed of independence

    Fact check: Is it easy to find jobs in Germany?
    In this edition of Fact check, we tell you about the different steps towards finding employment in Germany.

    Where to start if you're a refugee seeking advice in Sweden, Germany, Italy or Greece
     

    , @Erik Sieven
    that´s right. Also it is riciulous to talk about Sudan or Somalia. What really matters demographically is West Africa. Also "millions" is a vast underestimation. We are literally talking about billions.
    , @AnotherDad

    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn’t some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it’s actively enabled by Europe’s worthless and treasonous political class.
     
    The key point.

    In fairness, I think it's great that any one of these wankers is talking about African population--just as part of a process of getting people "woke".

    But his statement is rife with the same old "fixing Africa" nonsense. We must fix Africa and if we don't blah, blah, blah ...

    This is almost 180 from the reality, which is that Europe aiding/enabling this migration and absent Europe doing that there is no "migration crisis" at all. If Europe just stops doing that and enforces its borders, Africa still sucks, but it isn't infecting the rest of the world.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    //www.unz.com/isteve/eu-parliament-president-african-exodus-to-europe-threatens-disaster-of-biblical-proportions/#comment-1929241
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Former Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi, the head of the ruling Democratic Party, said yesterday Italy should allow only a ‘fixed number’ of migrants into the country as it grapples with a wave of people arriving by sea from North Africa.

    That fixed number should be -1M/year until they are all gone.

    But it is nice to see the institutional imperative start to bite. These retarded scum are starting to realize that if they keep going with their virtue signaling policies, it will only signal an end to their cushy sinecures.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Arclight
    I am puzzled as to why there are any in Italy at all - on my trips there, Italians openly dislike the Africans that have arrived there, and its seems crazy that the government continues to do nothing about it when it seems like a solid majority of the country would like to seem them gone. I realize Italian government has a reputation for incompetence, but this doesn't seem like a difficult thing to arrange.
    , @Fredrik
    What's happened is that Austria has said they will use the army to set up roadblocks to prevent the Africans from leaving Italy.

    This is why Italian politicians suddenly see the problem and want to fix it.
  3. Stating the obvious, but not forcefully enough. But at least someone in the EU power structure admits there’s a problem.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ben tillman

    Stating the obvious, but not forcefully enough. But at least someone in the EU power structure admits there’s a problem.
     
    Yes. It could be too little too late, but it's at least mildly encouraging.
    , @Lagertha
    The funniest thing for me, after all these "cereal" posturing by EU effetes...after all those lamestream pontificating, scurrilous nation-states, Trump said: " thanks and I'm jetting outta here now." wow. Very Jersey - love it! the beach rules...it's summer!
    , @RonaldB
    I disagree that the EU power structure is reacting to alleviate the problem.

    The dynamics are pretty obvious. The EU gins up a problem with Europe by importing millions of low-skill, low-IQ, low-impulse-control Africans and Middle Easterners. They then assert the problem can only be solved by massive transfers of wealth to the fertile countries. This massive transfer of wealth will go through the EU leaders and bureaucracy, which will deduct its share of operating expenses, fees, and honorariums.

    In other words, it's simply part of the scheme to centralize European wealth and control to the EU bureaucracy even more than it is already.

    The problem will not be solved by dumping massive resources into the fertile countries, because their peoples invest whatever wealth they accumulate into...more babies. But, the objective of the EU is not to reduce African fertility, but to transfer European wealth to the EU bureaucracy.

    Notice Tajani didn't devote even a whiff of attention to the only real solution for Europe: cut off access to Europe. This is a simple, cheap solution that does not enhance the power of the EU bureaucracy and hence is not even discussed.
  4. Malthus was right.

    Malthus has always been right.

    Malthus never predicted a global Apocalypse. That’s big-lie propaganda.

    Malthus only described how the world works. When a nation has reached a certain size, when there is no longer an open frontier, then the power of exponential growth is so great, that if people keep trying to double and quadruple and octuple etc.etc.etc. they will fail – and the result will be, not usually famine, but crushing misery.

    I blame those economic whores – Milton Friedman, Julian Simon, Paul Krugman – for DEMANDING that more people are ALWAYS better and that prosperity depends on people breeding like rabbits. These ‘economists’ should be forced to practice what they have so sanctimoniously preached. They (if still living) and their descendants should be stripped of all wealth and shipped off to Yemen or Bangladesh where they may experience the vibrant dynamic economics of ‘the more the merrier’ at a more personal level.

    Read More
    • Agree: Autochthon
    • Replies: @AM

    Malthus has always been right.
     
    Except we're reaching peak population and I personally, at least, have never experienced a famine or severe food shortage. That would be unlike most of my ancestors.

    How about the world is complex and when you add people, you do add resources to the world and yes, it's a good thing? And yes, we need resources to support those resources so let's think about that, too.


    I blame those economic whores – Milton Friedman, Julian Simon, Paul Krugman – for DEMANDING that more people are ALWAYS better and that prosperity depends on people breeding like rabbits.
     
    It's really extremist to have these kinds of views. Either we must all NEVER have children LEST WE DIE OF STARVATION (hasn't happened yet, could - but not yet) OR people are clearly promoting BREEDING LIKE RABBITS (TM). It's like having the number of children they could reasonably personally support, whether it's 0, 1, or 5 (sometimes 11) is like an mysterious concept never to be found in the chasm between the extremes.


    Yes, the economist bunch leaves much to be desired, but it's in the idea that economic prosperity is 100% about population numbers and nothing to do with culture and morality. They make us widgets, like a person from Niger has the same wants, motivations, and desires as myself. Like citizen in low trust country will have the same economic impact as citizen in a high trust country.

    They over simplify and in that, the theories are worthless. But people as resources, yes, that's a pretty consistent truth.

    , @RonaldB
    " economic whores – Milton Friedman, Julian Simon, Paul Krugman"

    You're being a bit harsh here.

    These economists were correct within the context of a Western culture and a Western population: high effort in child-raising, technological innovation, and a relatively free market. And in Western countries, the population has generally leveled off well in accord with the increased resources made available by technology. An example is the relatively new technology of fracking, which has dramatically increase the oil and gas reserves not just in the world, but in the West. And, I'm in favor of fracking companies paying the full (and then some) expenses of any damages done by the fracking process.

    But the dynamics are completely different when you get populations for which more babies are a genetic and cultural imperative, child-rearing is a low-attention process, and your productivity is not an index of what resources you have access to.

    These economists had integrity and were correct as far as the world they knew. It's a different world now with different rules.
  5. They have navies, don’t they? Their warships have guns, don’t they?

    This is not in the least bit complicated.

    Read More
    • Agree: Anonym
    • Replies: @neutral
    They have navies, but it seems that they see the function of the navy to be the ferry service for African migration.
    , @Kylie
    They have navies. They have warships.

    They also have borders.
    , @RonaldB
    There's actually a bit more complication than that.

    International law generally mandates that people adrift on the open seas be picked up when encountered. The European courts, particularly the International Court of Human Rights, would consider the case of a navy ignoring refugees on the seas as a criminal offense, and would no doubt issue warrants for the arrest of the naval officers involved, as well as any leaders giving the orders.

    So, any country choosing to ignore refugees in leaky rafts would at one step have to be willing to be accorded criminal status and treat the rest of the world as enemy territory. Their military and leadership would be subject to arrest when traveling anywhere in the world.

    This is the situation which would probably face Israel, except the US quite rightly vetoes any such proposal and has enough clout to make it stick.

    The willingness to face this situation is a test of high leadership, and is simply not present in the majority of countries, with the exception of East Europe.
  6. It’s instructive to remember what happened to the natives when that Biblical exodus arrived in their settled lands.

    Read More
  7. This has to be fake. I refuse to believe it. Either that, or the man had a slight aneurysm or something and he isn’t thinking clearly.

    Read More
  8. I am old enough to remember when Sweden and Scandinavia was the goal other nations strived for but could never achieve.

    A search on google news for Malmo yielded the following on just the first page:

    Malmö travel warning debate a ‘storm in a teacup’: travel agency

    https://www.thelocal.se/20170705/malmo-travel-warning-debate-a-storm-in-a-teacup-travel-agency

    Three men injured in Malmö shooting

    https://www.thelocal.se/20170703/three-men-injured-in-malmo-shooting-holma

    Man injured in shooting in Rosengård, Malmö

    https://www.thelocal.se/20170707/man-injured-in-shooting-in-rosengard-malmo-sweden

    Teen who shot Malmö janitor sentenced in court

    https://www.thelocal.se/20170707/teen-16-who-shot-malm-janitor-sentenced-in-court

    Read More
  9. @Lord Larperston
    They have navies, don't they? Their warships have guns, don't they?

    This is not in the least bit complicated.

    They have navies, but it seems that they see the function of the navy to be the ferry service for African migration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @George
    Frontex, not the navy, is the EU organization not defending the border. The navy is different, the navy is the NATO organization defending Europe from the USSR/Warsaw Pact.

    5 VESSELS DEPLOYED BY FRONTEX ENGAGED IN RESCUE OPERATIONS IN CENTRAL MEDITERRANEAN

    http://frontex.europa.eu/news/5-vessels-deployed-by-frontex-engaged-in-rescue-operations-in-central-mediterranean-rqf8Zs
  10. The reason they are coming is they have seen no evidence that they will be stopped. Quite the contrary. They will stop after the first time they are forcefully rejected.

    This is not in the least bit complicated.

    Read More
  11. Climate change and famine. Somalia is closing in on thirty years as a failed state and finally European elites are realizing they need to stop Somalias from moving to Europe in mass. How can the citizens of these countries continue to allow themselves to ruled by these dunces?

    Read More
    • Replies: @RonaldB
    With all due respect, Tajani said nothing whatsoever about stopping the flow of refugees/migrants at the border. He talked about solving the "problems" of the breeder countries, which is an entirely different matter.
  12. No they don’t have navies. No they don’t have guns. The Italian navy for example consists of a few patrol boats which mostly pick up the sexy, no-work layabouts so aging cat ladies and various sloots can get tingle thrills and rapefugee rackets can work like gangbusters.

    Europe has a pretend military, which could not fight its way out of a paper bag. That they have mostly female Presidents, Prime Ministers, and Defense Ministers is a tell that they have no real serious military. France has one aircraft carrier that cannot leave port; and that’s it.

    No, no European GOVERNMENT will or can defend its borders; they lack both the means and the will outside the Visegrad Four. [Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia]. The people are another matter and a young, hungry man might well look at the fat, comfortable, stupid, and sleek people in the government and think “why not me?” instead of Muslim and African invaders.

    Who lets get real, are invited in by the aging cat ladies and sloots that populate Europe’s fairer sex.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome


    No they don’t have navies. No they don’t have guns.

     

    To be fair, an inflatible raft can be sunk by a bb gun firing from a rowboat.
  13. Duh!…If the Africans aren’t going to starve, they need to emigrate to a 1st world country. Since Asia doesn’t allow immigration and has no use for Africans, that means Europe and North America are the targets. If Africans are allowed in, everything collapses…

    Read More
  14. Is this something we are allowed to notice? I’m curious as to whether or not Mr. Tajani gets backlash for saying this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    It's an attempt to smuggle in five more lies under the cover of one grudging truth.
    , @Mike Street Station

    Is this something we are allowed to notice? I’m curious as to whether or not Mr. Tajani gets backlash for saying this.
     
    I'm wondering if Bill Gate's recent skepticism on unlimited African immigration to Europe has allowed others to voice those opinions.
  15. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Daily mail continuing covfefe of the Pamplona carnage:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?sel=site&searchPhrase=pamplona

    The pics are gnarly. Jose Escolar bulls take it up a notch.

    Funny to some gray haired guys in the mix. How about it, Steve?

    Read More
  16. Didn’t Macron say as much during his campaign? Thought he said something that it was futile for Europe to stop migrants, the French voted for him anyway.

    The Germans voted for Merkel’s party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don’t? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ben tillman

    The Germans voted for Merkel’s party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don’t? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.
     
    Because they are us. They can carry our genetic structures into the future.
    , @bartok
    We fought the 20th century Communists. Now they are back, (you will note, we didn't demand their unconditional surrender, we didn't have de-Commiefication and we didn't have Truth and Reconcilation, never mind 'Venona' trials).

    Yes, we have to fight them again to hold on to Europe, the 21st century Communists: racial communists, sex communists, sexual communists, Singularity Communists and other J*ws.

    What is the alternative?
    , @Desiderius

    Let the Africans & Muslims take over.
     
    On the bright side they can get rid of female suffrage and cancel the $20 trillion debt.

    We can't control our women, maybe they can.
    , @Negrolphin Pool
    On the other hand, if herds of benighted tramps can take the place over, why doesn't some enterprising group put together a team of mercs and claim a country or two as their personal fiefdom? The German economy, for example, is still worth quite a lot.
    , @Thea
    It's like watching your best friend comit suicide.
  17. @Rob McX
    Stating the obvious, but not forcefully enough. But at least someone in the EU power structure admits there's a problem.

    Stating the obvious, but not forcefully enough. But at least someone in the EU power structure admits there’s a problem.

    Yes. It could be too little too late, but it’s at least mildly encouraging.

    Read More
  18. @Ed
    Didn't Macron say as much during his campaign? Thought he said something that it was futile for Europe to stop migrants, the French voted for him anyway.

    The Germans voted for Merkel's party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don't? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.

    The Germans voted for Merkel’s party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don’t? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.

    Because they are us. They can carry our genetic structures into the future.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anony-mouse
    Neither Macron nor Merkel have any biological children.
  19. Here’s a really simple strategy: any vessel illegally entering the waters of an EU nation will be towed back to country of origin (if in doubt, due south) with all on board and the vessel sunk in shallow waters.

    Read More
  20. I bet he disappears before the end of the month. By the time the mass of Europeans actually figure out how bad it’s going to get, it’ll be too late to do anything about it. Short of getting the Wehrmacht back in the saddle, doesn’t appear to be the political will to challenge Merkle and the rest of the morons…

    Read More
  21. Now they’re laughing at German men, he’s right too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ogunsiron
    I agree with the note at the end of the video. It seems to have been made by an african who can't believe what is happening and who can hardly believe what the vibrants are able to get away with. He seems angry at the germans for letting all of this happen to their country. He's angry at the european politicians doing nothing. He says that France is already gone. I think he's very frustrated and just doesn't get why Europeans don't seem to care.

    There's an algerian guy nicknamed Aldo Sterone who does french language videos that are a little bit of this type in that he tries to get it across to the French that they're losing their country. He gets angry at the French for allowing this to happen. It's the anger of someone who cares.

  22. @Ed
    Didn't Macron say as much during his campaign? Thought he said something that it was futile for Europe to stop migrants, the French voted for him anyway.

    The Germans voted for Merkel's party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don't? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.

    We fought the 20th century Communists. Now they are back, (you will note, we didn’t demand their unconditional surrender, we didn’t have de-Commiefication and we didn’t have Truth and Reconcilation, never mind ‘Venona’ trials).

    Yes, we have to fight them again to hold on to Europe, the 21st century Communists: racial communists, sex communists, sexual communists, Singularity Communists and other J*ws.

    What is the alternative?

    Read More
  23. Antonio Tajani……Is speaking in tongues because being anti-migrant = you are a racist Nazi in Germany, Sweden and the EU apparatus in their new billion dollar buildings in Brussels. Built with money extorted from Microsoft, Google and other American hi-tech companies. Best case scenario (I rate at 50%) Tajani is trying to lay the groundwork for the EU to use military force to repel this African-Muslim tsunami.

    Read More
  24. The Biblical exodus consisted of just 500,000 people, and it was a one-time event. Would that Europe were that lucky.

    Read More
  25. This interview is most likely the beginning of the end of Antonio Tajani’s political career.

    Read More
  26. @Anonymous
    Daily mail continuing covfefe of the Pamplona carnage:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?sel=site&searchPhrase=pamplona

    The pics are gnarly. Jose Escolar bulls take it up a notch.

    Funny to some gray haired guys in the mix. How about it, Steve?

    I prefer not to.

    Read More
    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    Bartelby the Sailer!
    , @rsj
    Perhaps the New Orleans running of the bulls would be more your speed Mr. Sailer?

    http://lagniappeslair.blogspot.com/2017/07/running-with-bulls-new-orleans-style.html
  27. To a certain extent I have been using this blog like Midas’ barber used his hole in the ground (so to speak). I live in a very liberal place and, frankly, cannot imagine productively discussing these ideas with my immediate family, at least until things get considerably worse.

    That said, LET THEM STARVE!! We owe them nothing and if we do not protect Western European demographics, if we allow millions of Africans to migrate North, EVERYTHING we have accomplished as a people will be gone (as Trump, to his extreme credit, recently stated). If SSA can’t work out its own problems, that’s sad, but allowing SSA to expand across the face of the Earth would be sadder.

    (BTW, this imperative to protect our rarefied culture includes Sweden and Germany’s traditional job of protecting NWE from Slavs– something the Putin fan clubbers here ought to consider.)

    Let me ask the commentariat, as someone who has only tentatively and recently embraced the WN label– is there anything we can honestly do at this point? Are we just screwed?

    Kinda seems like it. Maybe India and China could be convinced to replace themselves instead? They seem to aspire to other aspects of Euro culture anyway.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonym
    Let me ask the commentariat, as someone who has only tentatively and recently embraced the WN label– is there anything we can honestly do at this point? Are we just screwed?

    1. Marry and have white children.
    2. Vote.
    3. Communicate. Talk to other people, say what you think. Expand the Overton Window in your own personal sphere of influence. Ridicule the left, they are richly deserving of it. Your own personal courage will embolden others.

    , @Anonymous
    'Germany' as a unified state only dates from 1871.
    Russia is a nation state is a great deal older.

    Prussia the predominant 'German state' from the 17th to 19th centuries was, traditionally, an ally of Russia.

    , @Autochthon
    Hear, hear! I share your contempt and dread for the Social Security Administration; it must be contained at all costs!
    , @RonaldB
    Think locally in terms of your own borders. Understand what you can and can't affect. Encourage the intelligence services of your country to have the objective of preventing the interference of other countries the in affairs of your country. Honestly, the real military threat of backward countries is not that great. The threat is other Western countries. The aggression of NATO to the Serbs in 1992 is a perfect example.
  28. @Ed
    Didn't Macron say as much during his campaign? Thought he said something that it was futile for Europe to stop migrants, the French voted for him anyway.

    The Germans voted for Merkel's party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don't? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.

    Let the Africans & Muslims take over.

    On the bright side they can get rid of female suffrage and cancel the $20 trillion debt.

    We can’t control our women, maybe they can.

    Read More
    • Agree: Kevin C.
    • Replies: @White Guy In Japan
    And throwing homos off of buildings will be OK. Always a silver lining.

    (Sarcasm warning! FBI no bully!)
  29. @death by pungi
    Is this something we are allowed to notice? I'm curious as to whether or not Mr. Tajani gets backlash for saying this.

    It’s an attempt to smuggle in five more lies under the cover of one grudging truth.

    Read More
  30. @neutral
    They have navies, but it seems that they see the function of the navy to be the ferry service for African migration.

    Frontex, not the navy, is the EU organization not defending the border. The navy is different, the navy is the NATO organization defending Europe from the USSR/Warsaw Pact.

    5 VESSELS DEPLOYED BY FRONTEX ENGAGED IN RESCUE OPERATIONS IN CENTRAL MEDITERRANEAN

    http://frontex.europa.eu/news/5-vessels-deployed-by-frontex-engaged-in-rescue-operations-in-central-mediterranean-rqf8Zs

    Read More
  31. @TG
    Malthus was right.

    Malthus has always been right.

    Malthus never predicted a global Apocalypse. That's big-lie propaganda.

    Malthus only described how the world works. When a nation has reached a certain size, when there is no longer an open frontier, then the power of exponential growth is so great, that if people keep trying to double and quadruple and octuple etc.etc.etc. they will fail - and the result will be, not usually famine, but crushing misery.

    I blame those economic whores - Milton Friedman, Julian Simon, Paul Krugman - for DEMANDING that more people are ALWAYS better and that prosperity depends on people breeding like rabbits. These 'economists' should be forced to practice what they have so sanctimoniously preached. They (if still living) and their descendants should be stripped of all wealth and shipped off to Yemen or Bangladesh where they may experience the vibrant dynamic economics of 'the more the merrier' at a more personal level.

    Malthus has always been right.

    Except we’re reaching peak population and I personally, at least, have never experienced a famine or severe food shortage. That would be unlike most of my ancestors.

    How about the world is complex and when you add people, you do add resources to the world and yes, it’s a good thing? And yes, we need resources to support those resources so let’s think about that, too.

    I blame those economic whores – Milton Friedman, Julian Simon, Paul Krugman – for DEMANDING that more people are ALWAYS better and that prosperity depends on people breeding like rabbits.

    It’s really extremist to have these kinds of views. Either we must all NEVER have children LEST WE DIE OF STARVATION (hasn’t happened yet, could – but not yet) OR people are clearly promoting BREEDING LIKE RABBITS (TM). It’s like having the number of children they could reasonably personally support, whether it’s 0, 1, or 5 (sometimes 11) is like an mysterious concept never to be found in the chasm between the extremes.

    Yes, the economist bunch leaves much to be desired, but it’s in the idea that economic prosperity is 100% about population numbers and nothing to do with culture and morality. They make us widgets, like a person from Niger has the same wants, motivations, and desires as myself. Like citizen in low trust country will have the same economic impact as citizen in a high trust country.

    They over simplify and in that, the theories are worthless. But people as resources, yes, that’s a pretty consistent truth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gaslighting Hotep

    They make us widgets, like a person from Niger has the same wants, motivations, and desires as myself. Like citizen in low trust country will have the same economic impact as citizen in a high trust country.
     
    I'll bet you can leave your front door unlocked in rural Niger.
  32. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    I have a simple solution. Don’t let them in / keep them out.

    BY FORCE IF REQUIRED.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
    It's not like Sweden's rainbow burqa brigade would be required to personally man the turrets. Does any European country currently have a functioning navy? Men who are trained in warfare can be called on to ply their trade. War is atrocity, and the West has been damn good at it. Maybe now, we can put some of those skills to good use.

    And the press loves selective reporting. Maybe they could selectively refrain from running full-page outrage porn every time some would-be Nigerien bandit fails his first swimming lesson in 2,000 feet of water.

  33. A huge part of the current problem are the NGOs that are working with people smugglers to make this happen:

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39686239

    https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2017/06/15/ngo-anti-smuggling-efforts-end-fueling-human-smuggling/

    A sharp crackdown on these “humanitarian” groups would help.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lurker
    The fact the NGOs are doing it is a sign that the governments endorse it. Cracking down implies something illicit (from the government pov) That and the assorted naval ferry services being operated.

    Close the borders, deport the invaders, crush the traitors.
  34. Something worth defending:

    Read More
    • Replies: @White Guy In Japan
    Horrible! How can they be happy without 50,000 Somalis! Unthinkable!
    , @Chrisnonymous
    I feel like there's a Grimm Brothers Fairy Tale in there somewhere. Like, at the bottom of that lake are 10,000 Somalis. They're wearing heavy winter coats and boots with their pockets full of metal coin--all given to them by the townspeople. "You say we should let you live here? By all means. You can have my brother's house. It's just there, across the ice. But first, you are so cold and have so little. Take whatever you like from my home..."
  35. @Desiderius

    Let the Africans & Muslims take over.
     
    On the bright side they can get rid of female suffrage and cancel the $20 trillion debt.

    We can't control our women, maybe they can.

    And throwing homos off of buildings will be OK. Always a silver lining.

    (Sarcasm warning! FBI no bully!)

    Read More
  36. @syonredux
    Something worth defending:


    https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/884091703241605121

    Horrible! How can they be happy without 50,000 Somalis! Unthinkable!

    Read More
  37. ANON says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    This speech is a prelude to the next speech which is:

    Europe must send trillions of € s to Africa so the honest, hardworking charitable African governments can develop industry, infrastructure, agriculture, sewers, water plants build modern houses with plumbing etc.

    Only thus can Europe save itself from the African invaders

    And 15 years later the trillions will be in off shore banks. Africa will be filthier than ever. And because Africa is far worse than it was in 2017 Europe will bring even more.

    Read More
  38. Most Western European countries are already deeply in debt. Now they face the prospect of endless spending on social welfare for the “refugees” as well as higher security spending. The increasing chaos is also a drag on economic growth (lower tourism, brain drain, etc.). If these countries don’t act soon, growth and revenues will slow further, taxes will rise and more people will flee. It’s a death spiral.

    Read More
    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    "If these (Western) countries don’t act soon, growth and revenues will slow further, taxes will rise and more people will flee."

    Where to ? I'm not sure Poland will have all of us. Historically the first to flee are the people with the money and the people who got us into the mess.

  39. This would be solved if piece of crap Poland would take its fair share.

    This is why demographics must change. With white men out of power we can make good laws that promote world prosperity

    Read More
    • Replies: @Nan
    Can't he'lp it if Poland is the only one remembering history. Jan Sobieski.
  40. @ben tillman

    The Germans voted for Merkel’s party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don’t? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.
     
    Because they are us. They can carry our genetic structures into the future.

    Neither Macron nor Merkel have any biological children.

    Read More
  41. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Pamplona San Fermin is very very manosphere.

    Not popular with lgbt or leftists in general.

    Very old school.

    We need to celebrate this. The limpwrists hate Pamplona.

    Read More
  42. Read More
    • Replies: @Lagertha
    so, ewwwww. Why has Nigeria not gotten it together? Shame on them!
    , @Lagertha
    _____Trash..._____Trash. Which govt institution is going to be responsible for picking up the trash we see here????
  43. @Roderick Spode
    To a certain extent I have been using this blog like Midas' barber used his hole in the ground (so to speak). I live in a very liberal place and, frankly, cannot imagine productively discussing these ideas with my immediate family, at least until things get considerably worse.

    That said, LET THEM STARVE!! We owe them nothing and if we do not protect Western European demographics, if we allow millions of Africans to migrate North, EVERYTHING we have accomplished as a people will be gone (as Trump, to his extreme credit, recently stated). If SSA can't work out its own problems, that's sad, but allowing SSA to expand across the face of the Earth would be sadder.

    (BTW, this imperative to protect our rarefied culture includes Sweden and Germany's traditional job of protecting NWE from Slavs-- something the Putin fan clubbers here ought to consider.)

    Let me ask the commentariat, as someone who has only tentatively and recently embraced the WN label-- is there anything we can honestly do at this point? Are we just screwed?

    Kinda seems like it. Maybe India and China could be convinced to replace themselves instead? They seem to aspire to other aspects of Euro culture anyway.

    Let me ask the commentariat, as someone who has only tentatively and recently embraced the WN label– is there anything we can honestly do at this point? Are we just screwed?

    1. Marry and have white children.
    2. Vote.
    3. Communicate. Talk to other people, say what you think. Expand the Overton Window in your own personal sphere of influence. Ridicule the left, they are richly deserving of it. Your own personal courage will embolden others.

    Read More
    • Agree: Thea, Autochthon
    • Disagree: Kevin C.
    • Replies: @L Woods
    3 doesn't work. Stick your neck out in that way, and the only thing you'll inspire is the manifest cowardice of the white males around you as they slink away from/disavow you like the loathsome pusillanimous curs they are. I've actually seen more open mindedness from minorities, truth be told. The average white man is a bovine fool who is as deserving of his impending demise as leftists are of mere ridicule.
  44. @Rob McX
    Stating the obvious, but not forcefully enough. But at least someone in the EU power structure admits there's a problem.

    The funniest thing for me, after all these “cereal” posturing by EU effetes…after all those lamestream pontificating, scurrilous nation-states, Trump said: ” thanks and I’m jetting outta here now.” wow. Very Jersey – love it! the beach rules…it’s summer!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lagertha
    meant to refer to the nothingburger of Hamburg...the hamburger of 2017 that is now, kind of , not really wanting to be remembered for being a Hamburger! Haha...hamburger jokes were big in the 60's in Hamburg, and elsewhere in Europe since the McDonald's chain had anchored themselves into Europe- had to be there to see the beginning in 69-71.
  45. @eah
    https://twitter.com/nontolerantman/status/883581354037977088

    so, ewwwww. Why has Nigeria not gotten it together? Shame on them!

    Read More
  46. @Lagertha
    The funniest thing for me, after all these "cereal" posturing by EU effetes...after all those lamestream pontificating, scurrilous nation-states, Trump said: " thanks and I'm jetting outta here now." wow. Very Jersey - love it! the beach rules...it's summer!

    meant to refer to the nothingburger of Hamburg...the hamburger of 2017 that is now, kind of , not really wanting to be remembered for being a Hamburger! Haha…hamburger jokes were big in the 60′s in Hamburg, and elsewhere in Europe since the McDonald’s chain had anchored themselves into Europe- had to be there to see the beginning in 69-71.

    Read More
  47. @eah
    https://twitter.com/nontolerantman/status/883581354037977088

    _____Trash…_____Trash. Which govt institution is going to be responsible for picking up the trash we see here????

    Read More
  48. @Tiny Duck
    This would be solved if piece of crap Poland would take its fair share.

    This is why demographics must change. With white men out of power we can make good laws that promote world prosperity

    Can’t he’lp it if Poland is the only one remembering history. Jan Sobieski.

    Read More
  49. @German_reader
    That Tajani fellow is either dishonest or a fool. It isn't those without any hope who are trying to cross over into Europe - it's mostly young men who manage to scrounge together enough money (often thousands of dollars) for the journey. The image of desperate famished refugees fleeing for Europe because their lives are in danger is a fantasy.
    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn't some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it's actively enabled by Europe's worthless and treasonous political class.

    I read somewhere that the media deliberately take photos and videos that make it appear these invasive migrants are mostly women and children. The number of teen-aged and adult males is minimized as much as possible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    The photos I see seem to bear out the UN's official numbers of 70% men. I suspect it's even higher. Women and children, men with families, are going to be very reluctant to journey along with dozens of young men who are strangers.
    , @Pericles
    When Merkel snuck down and opened the gates of Europe to the enemy (2015), this was readily evident. The media weepingly reported about women and children and inconvenient photos showed the vast hordes of young men with smartphones.

    Why did Germany have to elect Ephialtes the Traitor as president? Bad choice, kameraden.
    , @Anonymous
    First it was the drowned boy on the beach, then the shallow depth of field close-ups of women with children (the blurry mass still identifiable as men) in every outlet, hence the outrage over Nigel Farage's wide shot: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/16/nigel-farage-defends-ukip-breaking-point-poster-queue-of-migrants
  50. @Lord Larperston
    They have navies, don't they? Their warships have guns, don't they?

    This is not in the least bit complicated.

    They have navies. They have warships.

    They also have borders.

    Read More
  51. I was hoping/expecting that it will be the Italians who will be the first in EU to say basta.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Detective Club
    With national elections in 2018, the Italians are in the on-deck circle. Italians are pretty much fed up with the 30% minority, Lefty government that they presently have. It looks like the "right" will be back in power next year in the Chamber of Deputies. The Italian "right" just might put a stop to all "ngo" immigrant shipping to southern Italy - - - and not a moment too soon.

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.

    Theresa May called a General Election in April. May and her Tories ran a crappy campaign. The end-result was that Labour BREXIT voters and radical British Open Borders "yoof" voted for Corbyn and Labour in June. The Tories barely survive in a coalition with the Northern Irish Paisley Protestants. May is now begging Corbyn to support her new watered-down Tory BREXIT plan. During the period of time in which May was Home Secretary (2010-16), May was gung-ho for Open Borders. Corbyn doesn't like the idea of helping wounded and bleeding Tories. He is waiting for the Tories and the Paisley Prots to kill each other off. He just may get his wish.

    As the French used to say, before Hollande and Macron, QUEL MERDE! - - - now the frogs just lie dead & horizontal on the proverbial lab table and take it from the fresh arrivals of the Third World . . .
  52. @German_reader
    That Tajani fellow is either dishonest or a fool. It isn't those without any hope who are trying to cross over into Europe - it's mostly young men who manage to scrounge together enough money (often thousands of dollars) for the journey. The image of desperate famished refugees fleeing for Europe because their lives are in danger is a fantasy.
    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn't some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it's actively enabled by Europe's worthless and treasonous political class.

    Good comment. What’s lacking is the political will to stop the invasion because elites benefit from it (or think they do).

    Read More
  53. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    How ironic it is that a top Eurocrat pontificates thus.

    Well, the *truth* of the matter is that the EU is *wholly and solely* responsible for the current ‘migrant crisis’ which will eventually and inevitably kill Europe.

    The EU *insists* that member states cannot derogate from that god-awful Geneva Convention on ‘Refugees’ – something which *legally obligates* the invasion. It is the EU which forbids ‘push-backs’. It is the EU which outlaws ‘discriminatory’ policies which are necessitated in order to deal with this crisis.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rob McX
    True. The EU dictates what laws and treaties its member states abide by. And the refugee treaties are in effect an agreement to abolish borders with the Third World. There's no clear dividing line between refugees and immigrants anyway. Overpopulation and inability to form a functioning state are what turns these Third World hell-holes into "war-torn" countries, which allows their people to claim asylum in Europe. In the long run, they're not escaping the chaotic savagery of their native lands. They're just importing it to ours.
  54. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Roderick Spode
    To a certain extent I have been using this blog like Midas' barber used his hole in the ground (so to speak). I live in a very liberal place and, frankly, cannot imagine productively discussing these ideas with my immediate family, at least until things get considerably worse.

    That said, LET THEM STARVE!! We owe them nothing and if we do not protect Western European demographics, if we allow millions of Africans to migrate North, EVERYTHING we have accomplished as a people will be gone (as Trump, to his extreme credit, recently stated). If SSA can't work out its own problems, that's sad, but allowing SSA to expand across the face of the Earth would be sadder.

    (BTW, this imperative to protect our rarefied culture includes Sweden and Germany's traditional job of protecting NWE from Slavs-- something the Putin fan clubbers here ought to consider.)

    Let me ask the commentariat, as someone who has only tentatively and recently embraced the WN label-- is there anything we can honestly do at this point? Are we just screwed?

    Kinda seems like it. Maybe India and China could be convinced to replace themselves instead? They seem to aspire to other aspects of Euro culture anyway.

    ‘Germany’ as a unified state only dates from 1871.
    Russia is a nation state is a great deal older.

    Prussia the predominant ‘German state’ from the 17th to 19th centuries was, traditionally, an ally of Russia.

    Read More
  55. Hopefully immigration will be the straw that breaks the camels back and causes the disintegration of the EU. Most people I talk to agree that politicians are living in a fantasy world.

    Read More
  56. But please think of what Bono would say! Do you want a Europe with walls?

    Read More
  57. @Ed
    Didn't Macron say as much during his campaign? Thought he said something that it was futile for Europe to stop migrants, the French voted for him anyway.

    The Germans voted for Merkel's party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don't? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.

    On the other hand, if herds of benighted tramps can take the place over, why doesn’t some enterprising group put together a team of mercs and claim a country or two as their personal fiefdom? The German economy, for example, is still worth quite a lot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Autochthon
    It's a classic problem of the first mover. (As soon as someone with the capital does it, though, I am signing up!)
  58. @anon
    I have a simple solution. Don't let them in / keep them out.

    BY FORCE IF REQUIRED.

    It’s not like Sweden’s rainbow burqa brigade would be required to personally man the turrets. Does any European country currently have a functioning navy? Men who are trained in warfare can be called on to ply their trade. War is atrocity, and the West has been damn good at it. Maybe now, we can put some of those skills to good use.

    And the press loves selective reporting. Maybe they could selectively refrain from running full-page outrage porn every time some would-be Nigerien bandit fails his first swimming lesson in 2,000 feet of water.

    Read More
  59. @utu
    I was hoping/expecting that it will be the Italians who will be the first in EU to say basta.

    With national elections in 2018, the Italians are in the on-deck circle. Italians are pretty much fed up with the 30% minority, Lefty government that they presently have. It looks like the “right” will be back in power next year in the Chamber of Deputies. The Italian “right” just might put a stop to all “ngo” immigrant shipping to southern Italy – – – and not a moment too soon.

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.

    Theresa May called a General Election in April. May and her Tories ran a crappy campaign. The end-result was that Labour BREXIT voters and radical British Open Borders “yoof” voted for Corbyn and Labour in June. The Tories barely survive in a coalition with the Northern Irish Paisley Protestants. May is now begging Corbyn to support her new watered-down Tory BREXIT plan. During the period of time in which May was Home Secretary (2010-16), May was gung-ho for Open Borders. Corbyn doesn’t like the idea of helping wounded and bleeding Tories. He is waiting for the Tories and the Paisley Prots to kill each other off. He just may get his wish.

    As the French used to say, before Hollande and Macron, QUEL MERDE! – – – now the frogs just lie dead & horizontal on the proverbial lab table and take it from the fresh arrivals of the Third World . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lurker
    Corbyn isn't particularly pro-EU but, I suspect, regards Merkel as far too tough on immigration.
    , @Chrisnonymous

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.
     
    I feel quite bad for the minority of Germans whose eyes are open but have have to live under the regimes voted in by their fellows... But I have an idea.

    Germany should dis-unify. That is, it should return to its Cold War-era division into West and East Germanies. The East can be populated by patriotic Germans, who will be allowed/encouraged to move there, and the West can be used as a dump for all the refugees, presided over by the Merkelites.

    It would be a shame to lose so much in the West, but we would be better off having a pro-German East Germany forming a block with Eastern European countries.

    It seems like a fantasy now of course, but think of the future: it wouldn't be the first time a two-state solution was proposed to end ethnic strife with Muslims.
    , @Pericles
    Sweden at the moment accepts only the EU minimum number of migrants, but the traitorous ex-commie Greens have been agitating for that to be changed (in their favorite paper (((Dagens Nyheter)))). To some, that still seems too little too late of course.
  60. I suggested Britain offer up South Georgia Island as a refugee center. There in the remote South Atlantic refugees could be kept and their requests for asylum evaluated. Once the word got out that you not be allowed to squat on the streets of Paris, London or Berlin but would have only penguins to sexually assault and pure glacial water to wash down your UN rations with I think the number seeking asylum would drop considerably.

    Read More
    • Agree: Negrolphin Pool
    • Replies: @Peter Johnson
    Good idea, and might pass the European Court of Justice test, maybe, if the situation worsens and the elites wise up considerably.
    , @Seth Largo
    South Georgia residency can also come with a free Antarctic cruise to McMurdo during the summer months, where refugees can find gainful employment.
    , @MBlanc46
    I'm sure that there are hundreds of desolate islands that would serve as "refugee" reception centers. Great idea, worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize.
  61. Overpopulation significantly compounds the problem, and well- meaning Western governments and NGOs are to blame, having provided aid in the form of both funds and good. This has allowed cultures that do not practice contraceptive restraint to reach population sizes that exceed the carrying capacity of the land, and their dysfunctional governments, lower prevailing average IQ (look it up, it’s a documented fact, and tribal cultures have prevented the use of technological innovation to foster economic growth to make up the shortfall. It’s really pretty damn simple.

    Read More
  62. @Phillip
    Overpopulation significantly compounds the problem, and well- meaning Western governments and NGOs are to blame, having provided aid in the form of both funds and good. This has allowed cultures that do not practice contraceptive restraint to reach population sizes that exceed the carrying capacity of the land, and their dysfunctional governments, lower prevailing average IQ (look it up, it's a documented fact, and tribal cultures have prevented the use of technological innovation to foster economic growth to make up the shortfall. It's really pretty damn simple.

    Food not good. Damn Korean predictive text.

    Read More
  63. “‘When people lose hope, they risk crossing the Sahara and the Mediterranean because it is worse to stay at home, where they run enormous risks. ”

    Utter garbage of course.

    1. It will always be worse ‘at home’ than in Europe.
    2. Conversely, migration is almost always the much riskier option.
    3. It is the *hope* of a much nicer life in Europe that prompts migration. Migrants take a big risk in search of a big reward.

    ***If they sent the migrants back, the migration would stop***.
    The migration destroying Europe is a product of migrants being allowed to stay.

    Read More
  64. @PapayaSF
    A huge part of the current problem are the NGOs that are working with people smugglers to make this happen:

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39686239

    https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2017/06/15/ngo-anti-smuggling-efforts-end-fueling-human-smuggling/

    A sharp crackdown on these "humanitarian" groups would help.

    The fact the NGOs are doing it is a sign that the governments endorse it. Cracking down implies something illicit (from the government pov) That and the assorted naval ferry services being operated.

    Close the borders, deport the invaders, crush the traitors.

    Read More
  65. @Detective Club
    With national elections in 2018, the Italians are in the on-deck circle. Italians are pretty much fed up with the 30% minority, Lefty government that they presently have. It looks like the "right" will be back in power next year in the Chamber of Deputies. The Italian "right" just might put a stop to all "ngo" immigrant shipping to southern Italy - - - and not a moment too soon.

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.

    Theresa May called a General Election in April. May and her Tories ran a crappy campaign. The end-result was that Labour BREXIT voters and radical British Open Borders "yoof" voted for Corbyn and Labour in June. The Tories barely survive in a coalition with the Northern Irish Paisley Protestants. May is now begging Corbyn to support her new watered-down Tory BREXIT plan. During the period of time in which May was Home Secretary (2010-16), May was gung-ho for Open Borders. Corbyn doesn't like the idea of helping wounded and bleeding Tories. He is waiting for the Tories and the Paisley Prots to kill each other off. He just may get his wish.

    As the French used to say, before Hollande and Macron, QUEL MERDE! - - - now the frogs just lie dead & horizontal on the proverbial lab table and take it from the fresh arrivals of the Third World . . .

    Corbyn isn’t particularly pro-EU but, I suspect, regards Merkel as far too tough on immigration.

    Read More
  66. @Roderick Spode
    To a certain extent I have been using this blog like Midas' barber used his hole in the ground (so to speak). I live in a very liberal place and, frankly, cannot imagine productively discussing these ideas with my immediate family, at least until things get considerably worse.

    That said, LET THEM STARVE!! We owe them nothing and if we do not protect Western European demographics, if we allow millions of Africans to migrate North, EVERYTHING we have accomplished as a people will be gone (as Trump, to his extreme credit, recently stated). If SSA can't work out its own problems, that's sad, but allowing SSA to expand across the face of the Earth would be sadder.

    (BTW, this imperative to protect our rarefied culture includes Sweden and Germany's traditional job of protecting NWE from Slavs-- something the Putin fan clubbers here ought to consider.)

    Let me ask the commentariat, as someone who has only tentatively and recently embraced the WN label-- is there anything we can honestly do at this point? Are we just screwed?

    Kinda seems like it. Maybe India and China could be convinced to replace themselves instead? They seem to aspire to other aspects of Euro culture anyway.

    Hear, hear! I share your contempt and dread for the Social Security Administration; it must be contained at all costs!

    Read More
  67. @Negrolphin Pool
    On the other hand, if herds of benighted tramps can take the place over, why doesn't some enterprising group put together a team of mercs and claim a country or two as their personal fiefdom? The German economy, for example, is still worth quite a lot.

    It’s a classic problem of the first mover. (As soon as someone with the capital does it, though, I am signing up!)

    Read More
  68. @unit472
    I suggested Britain offer up South Georgia Island as a refugee center. There in the remote South Atlantic refugees could be kept and their requests for asylum evaluated. Once the word got out that you not be allowed to squat on the streets of Paris, London or Berlin but would have only penguins to sexually assault and pure glacial water to wash down your UN rations with I think the number seeking asylum would drop considerably.

    Good idea, and might pass the European Court of Justice test, maybe, if the situation worsens and the elites wise up considerably.

    Read More
  69. @Kylie
    I read somewhere that the media deliberately take photos and videos that make it appear these invasive migrants are mostly women and children. The number of teen-aged and adult males is minimized as much as possible.

    The photos I see seem to bear out the UN’s official numbers of 70% men. I suspect it’s even higher. Women and children, men with families, are going to be very reluctant to journey along with dozens of young men who are strangers.

    Read More
  70. @Anonym
    Former Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi, the head of the ruling Democratic Party, said yesterday Italy should allow only a ‘fixed number’ of migrants into the country as it grapples with a wave of people arriving by sea from North Africa.

    That fixed number should be -1M/year until they are all gone.

    But it is nice to see the institutional imperative start to bite. These retarded scum are starting to realize that if they keep going with their virtue signaling policies, it will only signal an end to their cushy sinecures.

    I am puzzled as to why there are any in Italy at all – on my trips there, Italians openly dislike the Africans that have arrived there, and its seems crazy that the government continues to do nothing about it when it seems like a solid majority of the country would like to seem them gone. I realize Italian government has a reputation for incompetence, but this doesn’t seem like a difficult thing to arrange.

    Read More
  71. @Detective Club
    With national elections in 2018, the Italians are in the on-deck circle. Italians are pretty much fed up with the 30% minority, Lefty government that they presently have. It looks like the "right" will be back in power next year in the Chamber of Deputies. The Italian "right" just might put a stop to all "ngo" immigrant shipping to southern Italy - - - and not a moment too soon.

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.

    Theresa May called a General Election in April. May and her Tories ran a crappy campaign. The end-result was that Labour BREXIT voters and radical British Open Borders "yoof" voted for Corbyn and Labour in June. The Tories barely survive in a coalition with the Northern Irish Paisley Protestants. May is now begging Corbyn to support her new watered-down Tory BREXIT plan. During the period of time in which May was Home Secretary (2010-16), May was gung-ho for Open Borders. Corbyn doesn't like the idea of helping wounded and bleeding Tories. He is waiting for the Tories and the Paisley Prots to kill each other off. He just may get his wish.

    As the French used to say, before Hollande and Macron, QUEL MERDE! - - - now the frogs just lie dead & horizontal on the proverbial lab table and take it from the fresh arrivals of the Third World . . .

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.

    I feel quite bad for the minority of Germans whose eyes are open but have have to live under the regimes voted in by their fellows… But I have an idea.

    Germany should dis-unify. That is, it should return to its Cold War-era division into West and East Germanies. The East can be populated by patriotic Germans, who will be allowed/encouraged to move there, and the West can be used as a dump for all the refugees, presided over by the Merkelites.

    It would be a shame to lose so much in the West, but we would be better off having a pro-German East Germany forming a block with Eastern European countries.

    It seems like a fantasy now of course, but think of the future: it wouldn’t be the first time a two-state solution was proposed to end ethnic strife with Muslims.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Autochthon
    It won't be the first such proposition never implemented, either.
    , @Pericles
    Merkel came from East Germany though. In retrospect, great presidential material.
    , @German_reader
    In German online fora you occasionally read comments by East Germans who state they regret reunification given what's becoming of Germany. It's certainly hard to feel much attachment to this rotten federal republic as a patriot.
    Maybe something like your scenario will happen organically...West German cities are pretty much lost already.
  72. @Rob McX
    Stating the obvious, but not forcefully enough. But at least someone in the EU power structure admits there's a problem.

    I disagree that the EU power structure is reacting to alleviate the problem.

    The dynamics are pretty obvious. The EU gins up a problem with Europe by importing millions of low-skill, low-IQ, low-impulse-control Africans and Middle Easterners. They then assert the problem can only be solved by massive transfers of wealth to the fertile countries. This massive transfer of wealth will go through the EU leaders and bureaucracy, which will deduct its share of operating expenses, fees, and honorariums.

    In other words, it’s simply part of the scheme to centralize European wealth and control to the EU bureaucracy even more than it is already.

    The problem will not be solved by dumping massive resources into the fertile countries, because their peoples invest whatever wealth they accumulate into…more babies. But, the objective of the EU is not to reduce African fertility, but to transfer European wealth to the EU bureaucracy.

    Notice Tajani didn’t devote even a whiff of attention to the only real solution for Europe: cut off access to Europe. This is a simple, cheap solution that does not enhance the power of the EU bureaucracy and hence is not even discussed.

    Read More
  73. @TG
    Malthus was right.

    Malthus has always been right.

    Malthus never predicted a global Apocalypse. That's big-lie propaganda.

    Malthus only described how the world works. When a nation has reached a certain size, when there is no longer an open frontier, then the power of exponential growth is so great, that if people keep trying to double and quadruple and octuple etc.etc.etc. they will fail - and the result will be, not usually famine, but crushing misery.

    I blame those economic whores - Milton Friedman, Julian Simon, Paul Krugman - for DEMANDING that more people are ALWAYS better and that prosperity depends on people breeding like rabbits. These 'economists' should be forced to practice what they have so sanctimoniously preached. They (if still living) and their descendants should be stripped of all wealth and shipped off to Yemen or Bangladesh where they may experience the vibrant dynamic economics of 'the more the merrier' at a more personal level.

    ” economic whores – Milton Friedman, Julian Simon, Paul Krugman”

    You’re being a bit harsh here.

    These economists were correct within the context of a Western culture and a Western population: high effort in child-raising, technological innovation, and a relatively free market. And in Western countries, the population has generally leveled off well in accord with the increased resources made available by technology. An example is the relatively new technology of fracking, which has dramatically increase the oil and gas reserves not just in the world, but in the West. And, I’m in favor of fracking companies paying the full (and then some) expenses of any damages done by the fracking process.

    But the dynamics are completely different when you get populations for which more babies are a genetic and cultural imperative, child-rearing is a low-attention process, and your productivity is not an index of what resources you have access to.

    These economists had integrity and were correct as far as the world they knew. It’s a different world now with different rules.

    Read More
  74. @death by pungi
    Is this something we are allowed to notice? I'm curious as to whether or not Mr. Tajani gets backlash for saying this.

    Is this something we are allowed to notice? I’m curious as to whether or not Mr. Tajani gets backlash for saying this.

    I’m wondering if Bill Gate’s recent skepticism on unlimited African immigration to Europe has allowed others to voice those opinions.

    Read More
  75. @Lord Larperston
    They have navies, don't they? Their warships have guns, don't they?

    This is not in the least bit complicated.

    There’s actually a bit more complication than that.

    International law generally mandates that people adrift on the open seas be picked up when encountered. The European courts, particularly the International Court of Human Rights, would consider the case of a navy ignoring refugees on the seas as a criminal offense, and would no doubt issue warrants for the arrest of the naval officers involved, as well as any leaders giving the orders.

    So, any country choosing to ignore refugees in leaky rafts would at one step have to be willing to be accorded criminal status and treat the rest of the world as enemy territory. Their military and leadership would be subject to arrest when traveling anywhere in the world.

    This is the situation which would probably face Israel, except the US quite rightly vetoes any such proposal and has enough clout to make it stick.

    The willingness to face this situation is a test of high leadership, and is simply not present in the majority of countries, with the exception of East Europe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thea
    Towing them back to Africa would be humane and I think legal as well.
    , @Autochthon
    Don't be preposterous. The maritime law you cite was established for, and is sufficient only for, genuine situations of those stranded at sea. The ignominy and any punishment for a captain ignoring a shipwreck would be by and large meted out not by some international bugbear like the so-called International Court of Human Rights, but by the man's own sovereign should it learn of his behaviour. (Much as, in any functioning society, miscreant children fear much more the wrath of their fathers than that of the constabulary or the magistrate.)

    Here we've no shipwrecked persons nor distressed vessels relying upon the reciprocol altruism codified in maritime
    law; we've instead a deliberate and ongoing amphibious invasion. By your lights all the world may flaunt borders with impunity so long as they do so in a dinghy and wave a copy of some screed from the United Nations at their betters

    Notwithstanding the recent nonsense purporting to abridge sovereignty with all manner of formal rigmarole and bureaucracy such as you cite, the entire affair is a paper tiger. Who shall hold accountable the Italian navy should it begin towing, at gunpoint if need be, boats brimming with insolent Negroes back to the coasts of Africa whence they came? Or if the Greeks close their ports to these vermin, leaving them to turn back or bob in the open ocean, in international waters, until they should all starve? The Greeks have no responsibility in such a case. Will German naval officers be precluded from their frequent and indispensible trips to Tunisia? Will Morocco enact sanctions against the European nations to retaliate? Will the Chinese, what used to be the U.S.A., and Japan invade France to hunt down the alleged criminals? Who will issue these warrants you imagine? Who will execute them? Is the Sixth Fleet going to steam up the coast of Dover and launch cruise missiles at the parliament until the admiralty are handed over for trial and punishment?

    Do yourself a favour: stop smoking that stuff.

    , @Anonymous
    Yes.

    The only solution is derogation from the ECJ and ECHR and the re-assertion of national independence and sovereignty.

    Before the UK entered the EU - or for that matter acceded to the ECHR - the doctrine of 'parliamentary supremacy' ran writ in the UK. Basically, this means that no court, no judge etc can, in the final analysis, overrule the will of parliament. That's why there never ever were, until Tony Blair's time, any 'charter of individual rights' in the UK. Parliament was held to be the guarantor of citizen's rights.
    Wisely, by not having a written constitution or having courts that could possibly constrain parliament, or an enforceable 'bill of rights', the framers of the Westminster parliament knowingly and willing created a system that could smoothly react to the unpredictable crises thrown up by unknowable future events in a way that the most fitting course if action for the*nation* the highest and really only interest, could be taken without the national authority being hamstrung and tripped up by 'well meaning' but ultimately counteractive, legalistic measures.
  76. @Barnard
    Climate change and famine. Somalia is closing in on thirty years as a failed state and finally European elites are realizing they need to stop Somalias from moving to Europe in mass. How can the citizens of these countries continue to allow themselves to ruled by these dunces?

    With all due respect, Tajani said nothing whatsoever about stopping the flow of refugees/migrants at the border. He talked about solving the “problems” of the breeder countries, which is an entirely different matter.

    Read More
  77. @Roderick Spode
    To a certain extent I have been using this blog like Midas' barber used his hole in the ground (so to speak). I live in a very liberal place and, frankly, cannot imagine productively discussing these ideas with my immediate family, at least until things get considerably worse.

    That said, LET THEM STARVE!! We owe them nothing and if we do not protect Western European demographics, if we allow millions of Africans to migrate North, EVERYTHING we have accomplished as a people will be gone (as Trump, to his extreme credit, recently stated). If SSA can't work out its own problems, that's sad, but allowing SSA to expand across the face of the Earth would be sadder.

    (BTW, this imperative to protect our rarefied culture includes Sweden and Germany's traditional job of protecting NWE from Slavs-- something the Putin fan clubbers here ought to consider.)

    Let me ask the commentariat, as someone who has only tentatively and recently embraced the WN label-- is there anything we can honestly do at this point? Are we just screwed?

    Kinda seems like it. Maybe India and China could be convinced to replace themselves instead? They seem to aspire to other aspects of Euro culture anyway.

    Think locally in terms of your own borders. Understand what you can and can’t affect. Encourage the intelligence services of your country to have the objective of preventing the interference of other countries the in affairs of your country. Honestly, the real military threat of backward countries is not that great. The threat is other Western countries. The aggression of NATO to the Serbs in 1992 is a perfect example.

    Read More
  78. @RonaldB
    There's actually a bit more complication than that.

    International law generally mandates that people adrift on the open seas be picked up when encountered. The European courts, particularly the International Court of Human Rights, would consider the case of a navy ignoring refugees on the seas as a criminal offense, and would no doubt issue warrants for the arrest of the naval officers involved, as well as any leaders giving the orders.

    So, any country choosing to ignore refugees in leaky rafts would at one step have to be willing to be accorded criminal status and treat the rest of the world as enemy territory. Their military and leadership would be subject to arrest when traveling anywhere in the world.

    This is the situation which would probably face Israel, except the US quite rightly vetoes any such proposal and has enough clout to make it stick.

    The willingness to face this situation is a test of high leadership, and is simply not present in the majority of countries, with the exception of East Europe.

    Towing them back to Africa would be humane and I think legal as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Derbyshire
    scupper (verb, transitive) (Brit.) ... 2. to sink (one's ship) deliberately
    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/scupper?s=t
  79. @syonredux
    Something worth defending:


    https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/884091703241605121

    I feel like there’s a Grimm Brothers Fairy Tale in there somewhere. Like, at the bottom of that lake are 10,000 Somalis. They’re wearing heavy winter coats and boots with their pockets full of metal coin–all given to them by the townspeople. “You say we should let you live here? By all means. You can have my brother’s house. It’s just there, across the ice. But first, you are so cold and have so little. Take whatever you like from my home…”

    Read More
  80. @Wazoo
    Most Western European countries are already deeply in debt. Now they face the prospect of endless spending on social welfare for the "refugees" as well as higher security spending. The increasing chaos is also a drag on economic growth (lower tourism, brain drain, etc.). If these countries don't act soon, growth and revenues will slow further, taxes will rise and more people will flee. It's a death spiral.

    “If these (Western) countries don’t act soon, growth and revenues will slow further, taxes will rise and more people will flee.”

    Where to ? I’m not sure Poland will have all of us. Historically the first to flee are the people with the money and the people who got us into the mess.

    Read More
  81. @Thea
    Towing them back to Africa would be humane and I think legal as well.

    scupper (verb, transitive) (Brit.) … 2. to sink (one’s ship) deliberately

    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/scupper?s=t

    Read More
  82. @Chrisnonymous

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.
     
    I feel quite bad for the minority of Germans whose eyes are open but have have to live under the regimes voted in by their fellows... But I have an idea.

    Germany should dis-unify. That is, it should return to its Cold War-era division into West and East Germanies. The East can be populated by patriotic Germans, who will be allowed/encouraged to move there, and the West can be used as a dump for all the refugees, presided over by the Merkelites.

    It would be a shame to lose so much in the West, but we would be better off having a pro-German East Germany forming a block with Eastern European countries.

    It seems like a fantasy now of course, but think of the future: it wouldn't be the first time a two-state solution was proposed to end ethnic strife with Muslims.

    It won’t be the first such proposition never implemented, either.

    Read More
  83. @RonaldB
    There's actually a bit more complication than that.

    International law generally mandates that people adrift on the open seas be picked up when encountered. The European courts, particularly the International Court of Human Rights, would consider the case of a navy ignoring refugees on the seas as a criminal offense, and would no doubt issue warrants for the arrest of the naval officers involved, as well as any leaders giving the orders.

    So, any country choosing to ignore refugees in leaky rafts would at one step have to be willing to be accorded criminal status and treat the rest of the world as enemy territory. Their military and leadership would be subject to arrest when traveling anywhere in the world.

    This is the situation which would probably face Israel, except the US quite rightly vetoes any such proposal and has enough clout to make it stick.

    The willingness to face this situation is a test of high leadership, and is simply not present in the majority of countries, with the exception of East Europe.

    Don’t be preposterous. The maritime law you cite was established for, and is sufficient only for, genuine situations of those stranded at sea. The ignominy and any punishment for a captain ignoring a shipwreck would be by and large meted out not by some international bugbear like the so-called International Court of Human Rights, but by the man’s own sovereign should it learn of his behaviour. (Much as, in any functioning society, miscreant children fear much more the wrath of their fathers than that of the constabulary or the magistrate.)

    Here we’ve no shipwrecked persons nor distressed vessels relying upon the reciprocol altruism codified in maritime
    law; we’ve instead a deliberate and ongoing amphibious invasion. By your lights all the world may flaunt borders with impunity so long as they do so in a dinghy and wave a copy of some screed from the United Nations at their betters

    Notwithstanding the recent nonsense purporting to abridge sovereignty with all manner of formal rigmarole and bureaucracy such as you cite, the entire affair is a paper tiger. Who shall hold accountable the Italian navy should it begin towing, at gunpoint if need be, boats brimming with insolent Negroes back to the coasts of Africa whence they came? Or if the Greeks close their ports to these vermin, leaving them to turn back or bob in the open ocean, in international waters, until they should all starve? The Greeks have no responsibility in such a case. Will German naval officers be precluded from their frequent and indispensible trips to Tunisia? Will Morocco enact sanctions against the European nations to retaliate? Will the Chinese, what used to be the U.S.A., and Japan invade France to hunt down the alleged criminals? Who will issue these warrants you imagine? Who will execute them? Is the Sixth Fleet going to steam up the coast of Dover and launch cruise missiles at the parliament until the admiralty are handed over for trial and punishment?

    Do yourself a favour: stop smoking that stuff.

    Read More
  84. @Anonymous
    How ironic it is that a top Eurocrat pontificates thus.

    Well, the *truth* of the matter is that the EU is *wholly and solely* responsible for the current 'migrant crisis' which will eventually and inevitably kill Europe.

    The EU *insists* that member states cannot derogate from that god-awful Geneva Convention on 'Refugees' - something which *legally obligates* the invasion. It is the EU which forbids 'push-backs'. It is the EU which outlaws 'discriminatory' policies which are necessitated in order to deal with this crisis.

    True. The EU dictates what laws and treaties its member states abide by. And the refugee treaties are in effect an agreement to abolish borders with the Third World. There’s no clear dividing line between refugees and immigrants anyway. Overpopulation and inability to form a functioning state are what turns these Third World hell-holes into “war-torn” countries, which allows their people to claim asylum in Europe. In the long run, they’re not escaping the chaotic savagery of their native lands. They’re just importing it to ours.

    Read More
  85. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @RonaldB
    There's actually a bit more complication than that.

    International law generally mandates that people adrift on the open seas be picked up when encountered. The European courts, particularly the International Court of Human Rights, would consider the case of a navy ignoring refugees on the seas as a criminal offense, and would no doubt issue warrants for the arrest of the naval officers involved, as well as any leaders giving the orders.

    So, any country choosing to ignore refugees in leaky rafts would at one step have to be willing to be accorded criminal status and treat the rest of the world as enemy territory. Their military and leadership would be subject to arrest when traveling anywhere in the world.

    This is the situation which would probably face Israel, except the US quite rightly vetoes any such proposal and has enough clout to make it stick.

    The willingness to face this situation is a test of high leadership, and is simply not present in the majority of countries, with the exception of East Europe.

    Yes.

    The only solution is derogation from the ECJ and ECHR and the re-assertion of national independence and sovereignty.

    Before the UK entered the EU – or for that matter acceded to the ECHR – the doctrine of ‘parliamentary supremacy’ ran writ in the UK. Basically, this means that no court, no judge etc can, in the final analysis, overrule the will of parliament. That’s why there never ever were, until Tony Blair’s time, any ‘charter of individual rights’ in the UK. Parliament was held to be the guarantor of citizen’s rights.
    Wisely, by not having a written constitution or having courts that could possibly constrain parliament, or an enforceable ‘bill of rights’, the framers of the Westminster parliament knowingly and willing created a system that could smoothly react to the unpredictable crises thrown up by unknowable future events in a way that the most fitting course if action for the*nation* the highest and really only interest, could be taken without the national authority being hamstrung and tripped up by ‘well meaning’ but ultimately counteractive, legalistic measures.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RonaldB
    I agree with you on derogation.

    I cannot agree on your assertion of the disadvantages of a Constitution. The Bill of Rights is a life raft for US citizens. Furthermore, the Congress can, Constitutionally, pass any law it wants and remove it from the jurisdiction of court judgement. So, in effect, the Constitution is what Congress says it is.

    Since Congress, and the multi-cultural US are too divided to assert its Constitutional prerogatives, I doubt that abolishing the Constitution would do anything to preserve US liberties.
  86. @Ed
    Didn't Macron say as much during his campaign? Thought he said something that it was futile for Europe to stop migrants, the French voted for him anyway.

    The Germans voted for Merkel's party after two million migrants traipsed through Europe to get to Germany at her invitation. Why should America care if Europeans don't? Let the Africans & Muslims take over.

    It’s like watching your best friend comit suicide.

    Read More
  87. @Ed
    Now they're laughing at German men, he's right too.

    https://youtu.be/-GbN4y2Y0yU

    I agree with the note at the end of the video. It seems to have been made by an african who can’t believe what is happening and who can hardly believe what the vibrants are able to get away with. He seems angry at the germans for letting all of this happen to their country. He’s angry at the european politicians doing nothing. He says that France is already gone. I think he’s very frustrated and just doesn’t get why Europeans don’t seem to care.

    There’s an algerian guy nicknamed Aldo Sterone who does french language videos that are a little bit of this type in that he tries to get it across to the French that they’re losing their country. He gets angry at the French for allowing this to happen. It’s the anger of someone who cares.

    Read More
  88. @Anonym
    Former Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi, the head of the ruling Democratic Party, said yesterday Italy should allow only a ‘fixed number’ of migrants into the country as it grapples with a wave of people arriving by sea from North Africa.

    That fixed number should be -1M/year until they are all gone.

    But it is nice to see the institutional imperative start to bite. These retarded scum are starting to realize that if they keep going with their virtue signaling policies, it will only signal an end to their cushy sinecures.

    What’s happened is that Austria has said they will use the army to set up roadblocks to prevent the Africans from leaving Italy.

    This is why Italian politicians suddenly see the problem and want to fix it.

    Read More
  89. Africa fro Africans!
    China for Chinese!
    Japan for Japanese!
    Islam for Muslims!
    Europe for Europeans!

    Global consistency demands no less.

    Read More
  90. @unit472
    I suggested Britain offer up South Georgia Island as a refugee center. There in the remote South Atlantic refugees could be kept and their requests for asylum evaluated. Once the word got out that you not be allowed to squat on the streets of Paris, London or Berlin but would have only penguins to sexually assault and pure glacial water to wash down your UN rations with I think the number seeking asylum would drop considerably.

    South Georgia residency can also come with a free Antarctic cruise to McMurdo during the summer months, where refugees can find gainful employment.

    Read More
  91. Japan for Japanese!

    They are “white” enough to be in need of diversity. Those subway people packers are in danger of losing their jobs if their demographic crisis continues, doncha know.

    The list is missing “Israel for the Jews.”

    Islam for Muslims!

    Needs an asterisk for the area between the Nile and Euphrates.

    Read More
  92. In the long run, only the policies of the “extreme right” parties can save Europe from genocide, whether these parties are voted into power or other ones adopt their policies.

    The “conservatives” who promise to “tackle” the problem are the most pernicious. All they are really promising to do is reduce the rate at which immigration is increasing.

    For two reasons, the “conservatives” are worse than the far left as represented by people such as Jeremy Corbyn. For one thing, they fool the voters by posing as “reasonable” politicians as distinct from superannuated Trotskyites like Corbyn. Secondly, they have viable economic policies to offer which can see their countries through another decade or two of mass immigration. On the other hand, under a far left government, the economic Armageddon would come a lot sooner and Europeans would be forced to wake up or die.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    Additionally, I believe that mainstream "conservative" parties are more accomplished liars than the Leftists. Leftists tend to be so ideolgically driven that they tell the truth about what they want to do, e.g., let men use public facilities that your daughter will use.
  93. @Anonym
    Let me ask the commentariat, as someone who has only tentatively and recently embraced the WN label– is there anything we can honestly do at this point? Are we just screwed?

    1. Marry and have white children.
    2. Vote.
    3. Communicate. Talk to other people, say what you think. Expand the Overton Window in your own personal sphere of influence. Ridicule the left, they are richly deserving of it. Your own personal courage will embolden others.

    3 doesn’t work. Stick your neck out in that way, and the only thing you’ll inspire is the manifest cowardice of the white males around you as they slink away from/disavow you like the loathsome pusillanimous curs they are. I’ve actually seen more open mindedness from minorities, truth be told. The average white man is a bovine fool who is as deserving of his impending demise as leftists are of mere ridicule.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonym
    3 doesn’t work. Stick your neck out in that way, and the only thing you’ll inspire is the manifest cowardice of the white males around you as they slink away from/disavow you like the loathsome pusillanimous curs they are. I’ve actually seen more open mindedness from minorities, truth be told. The average white man is a bovine fool who is as deserving of his impending demise as leftists are of mere ridicule.

    One eloquent, confident and correct man can still swing a crowd. Most people are followers, it works like this to ensure society functions. Either step up and lead or be a fellow bovine on your way to the slaughterhouse.
  94. Check this out:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Verified Twitter responds: http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/10/macron-angers-his-fans-with-g20-africa-speech-video/
  95. @German_reader
    That Tajani fellow is either dishonest or a fool. It isn't those without any hope who are trying to cross over into Europe - it's mostly young men who manage to scrounge together enough money (often thousands of dollars) for the journey. The image of desperate famished refugees fleeing for Europe because their lives are in danger is a fantasy.
    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn't some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it's actively enabled by Europe's worthless and treasonous political class.

    According to Paul Collier in Exodus, at present it is mainly the relatively well to to who can afford to immigrate but immigration is best seen as an investment, the cost of whichis greatly reduced by diaspora, so immigration will naturally accelerate as the more and more prospective immigrants can count on help from relatives already in the West. Eventually it will indeed begin to take in even the poorer Africans a nd women and children.

    Read More
  96. Apparently Macron just gave a speech (that people are freaking out and calling racist) where he talked about Africa’s “civilizational problems” and women having 7 and 8 kids. Apparently this issue is now on the radar screen of Europe’s elites, big time. Will be interesting to see where it goes from here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    Ross Douthat objects:

    https://twitter.com/DouthatNYT/status/884474672859029505

    In this column he looks forward to Europe being Africanized:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/08/opinion/sunday/the-west-and-what-comes-after.html
  97. @Whiskey
    No they don't have navies. No they don't have guns. The Italian navy for example consists of a few patrol boats which mostly pick up the sexy, no-work layabouts so aging cat ladies and various sloots can get tingle thrills and rapefugee rackets can work like gangbusters.

    Europe has a pretend military, which could not fight its way out of a paper bag. That they have mostly female Presidents, Prime Ministers, and Defense Ministers is a tell that they have no real serious military. France has one aircraft carrier that cannot leave port; and that's it.

    No, no European GOVERNMENT will or can defend its borders; they lack both the means and the will outside the Visegrad Four. [Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia]. The people are another matter and a young, hungry man might well look at the fat, comfortable, stupid, and sleek people in the government and think "why not me?" instead of Muslim and African invaders.

    Who lets get real, are invited in by the aging cat ladies and sloots that populate Europe's fairer sex.

    No they don’t have navies. No they don’t have guns.

    To be fair, an inflatible raft can be sunk by a bb gun firing from a rowboat.

    Read More
  98. @Lagertha
    _____Trash..._____Trash. Which govt institution is going to be responsible for picking up the trash we see here????

    Breed, Ebola-Chan, breed.

    Read More
  99. @Kylie
    I read somewhere that the media deliberately take photos and videos that make it appear these invasive migrants are mostly women and children. The number of teen-aged and adult males is minimized as much as possible.

    When Merkel snuck down and opened the gates of Europe to the enemy (2015), this was readily evident. The media weepingly reported about women and children and inconvenient photos showed the vast hordes of young men with smartphones.

    Why did Germany have to elect Ephialtes the Traitor as president? Bad choice, kameraden.

    Read More
  100. @Detective Club
    With national elections in 2018, the Italians are in the on-deck circle. Italians are pretty much fed up with the 30% minority, Lefty government that they presently have. It looks like the "right" will be back in power next year in the Chamber of Deputies. The Italian "right" just might put a stop to all "ngo" immigrant shipping to southern Italy - - - and not a moment too soon.

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.

    Theresa May called a General Election in April. May and her Tories ran a crappy campaign. The end-result was that Labour BREXIT voters and radical British Open Borders "yoof" voted for Corbyn and Labour in June. The Tories barely survive in a coalition with the Northern Irish Paisley Protestants. May is now begging Corbyn to support her new watered-down Tory BREXIT plan. During the period of time in which May was Home Secretary (2010-16), May was gung-ho for Open Borders. Corbyn doesn't like the idea of helping wounded and bleeding Tories. He is waiting for the Tories and the Paisley Prots to kill each other off. He just may get his wish.

    As the French used to say, before Hollande and Macron, QUEL MERDE! - - - now the frogs just lie dead & horizontal on the proverbial lab table and take it from the fresh arrivals of the Third World . . .

    Sweden at the moment accepts only the EU minimum number of migrants, but the traitorous ex-commie Greens have been agitating for that to be changed (in their favorite paper (((Dagens Nyheter)))). To some, that still seems too little too late of course.

    Read More
  101. @Chrisnonymous

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.
     
    I feel quite bad for the minority of Germans whose eyes are open but have have to live under the regimes voted in by their fellows... But I have an idea.

    Germany should dis-unify. That is, it should return to its Cold War-era division into West and East Germanies. The East can be populated by patriotic Germans, who will be allowed/encouraged to move there, and the West can be used as a dump for all the refugees, presided over by the Merkelites.

    It would be a shame to lose so much in the West, but we would be better off having a pro-German East Germany forming a block with Eastern European countries.

    It seems like a fantasy now of course, but think of the future: it wouldn't be the first time a two-state solution was proposed to end ethnic strife with Muslims.

    Merkel came from East Germany though. In retrospect, great presidential material.

    Read More
  102. As of today, 101,314 “sea arrivals” in the Mediterranean, of which about 85,000 to Italy. Guinea, Nigeria, Cote d’Ivoire and Bangladesh are the most popular starting points.

    The total “sea arrivals” of 2016 was 362,753.

    Read More
  103. @Earl Lemongrab
    Apparently Macron just gave a speech (that people are freaking out and calling racist) where he talked about Africa's "civilizational problems" and women having 7 and 8 kids. Apparently this issue is now on the radar screen of Europe's elites, big time. Will be interesting to see where it goes from here.

    Ross Douthat objects:

    In this column he looks forward to Europe being Africanized:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/08/opinion/sunday/the-west-and-what-comes-after.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    I shouldn't think those need be rediscovered. Though technocrats are eager to expand populations, they do it the Biblical Migration way. They've consistently decried doing it the biological way, which if you're white is just plain icky. We have abortion and feminism for that.
  104. @L Woods
    3 doesn't work. Stick your neck out in that way, and the only thing you'll inspire is the manifest cowardice of the white males around you as they slink away from/disavow you like the loathsome pusillanimous curs they are. I've actually seen more open mindedness from minorities, truth be told. The average white man is a bovine fool who is as deserving of his impending demise as leftists are of mere ridicule.

    3 doesn’t work. Stick your neck out in that way, and the only thing you’ll inspire is the manifest cowardice of the white males around you as they slink away from/disavow you like the loathsome pusillanimous curs they are. I’ve actually seen more open mindedness from minorities, truth be told. The average white man is a bovine fool who is as deserving of his impending demise as leftists are of mere ridicule.

    One eloquent, confident and correct man can still swing a crowd. Most people are followers, it works like this to ensure society functions. Either step up and lead or be a fellow bovine on your way to the slaughterhouse.

    Read More
  105. @Chrisnonymous

    Germany goes to the polls later this year. Merkel is expected to win. Germany is well along the road to national suicide. It may be all over except the shouting for the Germans. Germany appears to be adopting the current Swedish national practice of self-immolation.
     
    I feel quite bad for the minority of Germans whose eyes are open but have have to live under the regimes voted in by their fellows... But I have an idea.

    Germany should dis-unify. That is, it should return to its Cold War-era division into West and East Germanies. The East can be populated by patriotic Germans, who will be allowed/encouraged to move there, and the West can be used as a dump for all the refugees, presided over by the Merkelites.

    It would be a shame to lose so much in the West, but we would be better off having a pro-German East Germany forming a block with Eastern European countries.

    It seems like a fantasy now of course, but think of the future: it wouldn't be the first time a two-state solution was proposed to end ethnic strife with Muslims.

    In German online fora you occasionally read comments by East Germans who state they regret reunification given what’s becoming of Germany. It’s certainly hard to feel much attachment to this rotten federal republic as a patriot.
    Maybe something like your scenario will happen organically…West German cities are pretty much lost already.

    Read More
  106. In the ancient world, there was a great upheaval at the end of the Bronze Age, when, whole peoples, what were later called the Sea Peoples, and others, began to move into and invade the great Bronze Age civilizations of the Near East. Their invasions and movements eventually destroyed those Bronze Age civilizations and ushered in the beginning of a Dark Age in the Near East. Out of that Dark Age, new states emerged. Only Egypt escaped the destruction and managed cultural continuity. They repelled the invaders with force by assembling a navy with bowmen. I suppose there is a lesson in there somewhere.

    Read More
  107. @German_reader
    That Tajani fellow is either dishonest or a fool. It isn't those without any hope who are trying to cross over into Europe - it's mostly young men who manage to scrounge together enough money (often thousands of dollars) for the journey. The image of desperate famished refugees fleeing for Europe because their lives are in danger is a fantasy.
    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn't some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it's actively enabled by Europe's worthless and treasonous political class.

    Look at the history of people trafficking.

    It’s always been lucrative.

    Read More
  108. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Kylie
    I read somewhere that the media deliberately take photos and videos that make it appear these invasive migrants are mostly women and children. The number of teen-aged and adult males is minimized as much as possible.

    First it was the drowned boy on the beach, then the shallow depth of field close-ups of women with children (the blurry mass still identifiable as men) in every outlet, hence the outrage over Nigel Farage’s wide shot: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/16/nigel-farage-defends-ukip-breaking-point-poster-queue-of-migrants

    Read More
  109. @AM

    Malthus has always been right.
     
    Except we're reaching peak population and I personally, at least, have never experienced a famine or severe food shortage. That would be unlike most of my ancestors.

    How about the world is complex and when you add people, you do add resources to the world and yes, it's a good thing? And yes, we need resources to support those resources so let's think about that, too.


    I blame those economic whores – Milton Friedman, Julian Simon, Paul Krugman – for DEMANDING that more people are ALWAYS better and that prosperity depends on people breeding like rabbits.
     
    It's really extremist to have these kinds of views. Either we must all NEVER have children LEST WE DIE OF STARVATION (hasn't happened yet, could - but not yet) OR people are clearly promoting BREEDING LIKE RABBITS (TM). It's like having the number of children they could reasonably personally support, whether it's 0, 1, or 5 (sometimes 11) is like an mysterious concept never to be found in the chasm between the extremes.


    Yes, the economist bunch leaves much to be desired, but it's in the idea that economic prosperity is 100% about population numbers and nothing to do with culture and morality. They make us widgets, like a person from Niger has the same wants, motivations, and desires as myself. Like citizen in low trust country will have the same economic impact as citizen in a high trust country.

    They over simplify and in that, the theories are worthless. But people as resources, yes, that's a pretty consistent truth.

    They make us widgets, like a person from Niger has the same wants, motivations, and desires as myself. Like citizen in low trust country will have the same economic impact as citizen in a high trust country.

    I’ll bet you can leave your front door unlocked in rural Niger.

    Read More
  110. @unit472
    I suggested Britain offer up South Georgia Island as a refugee center. There in the remote South Atlantic refugees could be kept and their requests for asylum evaluated. Once the word got out that you not be allowed to squat on the streets of Paris, London or Berlin but would have only penguins to sexually assault and pure glacial water to wash down your UN rations with I think the number seeking asylum would drop considerably.

    I’m sure that there are hundreds of desolate islands that would serve as “refugee” reception centers. Great idea, worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize.

    Read More
  111. @Rob McX
    In the long run, only the policies of the "extreme right" parties can save Europe from genocide, whether these parties are voted into power or other ones adopt their policies.

    The "conservatives" who promise to "tackle" the problem are the most pernicious. All they are really promising to do is reduce the rate at which immigration is increasing.

    For two reasons, the "conservatives" are worse than the far left as represented by people such as Jeremy Corbyn. For one thing, they fool the voters by posing as "reasonable" politicians as distinct from superannuated Trotskyites like Corbyn. Secondly, they have viable economic policies to offer which can see their countries through another decade or two of mass immigration. On the other hand, under a far left government, the economic Armageddon would come a lot sooner and Europeans would be forced to wake up or die.

    Additionally, I believe that mainstream “conservative” parties are more accomplished liars than the Leftists. Leftists tend to be so ideolgically driven that they tell the truth about what they want to do, e.g., let men use public facilities that your daughter will use.

    Read More
  112. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @German_reader
    That Tajani fellow is either dishonest or a fool. It isn't those without any hope who are trying to cross over into Europe - it's mostly young men who manage to scrounge together enough money (often thousands of dollars) for the journey. The image of desperate famished refugees fleeing for Europe because their lives are in danger is a fantasy.
    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn't some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it's actively enabled by Europe's worthless and treasonous political class.

    The EU doing what it does best: funding a “media project across national borders”. They’re “successful” coming together to erode Europe’s borders with the rest of the world:

    http://www.dw.com/en/pope-francis-praises-dw-infomigrants-news-service-as-austria-moves-to-control-border/a-39537251

    Pope Francis has sent a message to the InfoMigrants.net portal, a joint project of DW, Italy’s ANSA and France’s Media Monde. …

    “I am close with affection and encouragement to those institutions, associations and individuals who open up wisely to the migratory phenomenon with interventions of support, bearing witness to the human and Christian values that are the base of European civilization,” Pope Francis said.

    The Infomigrants portal, co-financed by the European Union, is published in French, Arabic and English and is aimed at migrants “to counter misinformation at every point of their journey,” …

    … Responding to the papal message, DW Director General Peter Limbourg said: “We are pleased to receive the encouragement of the Holy Father,” and added: “We can not be indifferent to the fate of millions of refugees and migrants.”

    Limbourg emphasized that InfoMigrants was not a refugee aid project but a channel for news and factual information: “With InfoMigrants we have succeeded in launching a European media project across national borders,” Limbourg said. “We want to help people but also to educate them about the dangers and indicate the route to legal migration.”

    Sample InfoMigrants.net stories:

    For this Syrian refugee in Germany, an apprenticeship makes all the difference

    Afousatou, a rebellious woman from the Ivory Coast who dreamed of independence

    Fact check: Is it easy to find jobs in Germany?
    In this edition of Fact check, we tell you about the different steps towards finding employment in Germany.

    Where to start if you’re a refugee seeking advice in Sweden, Germany, Italy or Greece

    Read More
  113. @German_reader
    Ross Douthat objects:

    https://twitter.com/DouthatNYT/status/884474672859029505

    In this column he looks forward to Europe being Africanized:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/08/opinion/sunday/the-west-and-what-comes-after.html

    I shouldn’t think those need be rediscovered. Though technocrats are eager to expand populations, they do it the Biblical Migration way. They’ve consistently decried doing it the biological way, which if you’re white is just plain icky. We have abortion and feminism for that.

    Read More
  114. @German_reader
    That Tajani fellow is either dishonest or a fool. It isn't those without any hope who are trying to cross over into Europe - it's mostly young men who manage to scrounge together enough money (often thousands of dollars) for the journey. The image of desperate famished refugees fleeing for Europe because their lives are in danger is a fantasy.
    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn't some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it's actively enabled by Europe's worthless and treasonous political class.

    that´s right. Also it is riciulous to talk about Sudan or Somalia. What really matters demographically is West Africa. Also “millions” is a vast underestimation. We are literally talking about billions.

    Read More
  115. @German_reader
    That Tajani fellow is either dishonest or a fool. It isn't those without any hope who are trying to cross over into Europe - it's mostly young men who manage to scrounge together enough money (often thousands of dollars) for the journey. The image of desperate famished refugees fleeing for Europe because their lives are in danger is a fantasy.
    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn't some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it's actively enabled by Europe's worthless and treasonous political class.

    Also missing is the fact that European governments are making all of this possible by having their navies pick up the invaders and transport them to Europe. This isn’t some sort of natural disaster nothing can be done about, it’s actively enabled by Europe’s worthless and treasonous political class.

    The key point.

    In fairness, I think it’s great that any one of these wankers is talking about African population–just as part of a process of getting people “woke”.

    But his statement is rife with the same old “fixing Africa” nonsense. We must fix Africa and if we don’t blah, blah, blah …

    This is almost 180 from the reality, which is that Europe aiding/enabling this migration and absent Europe doing that there is no “migration crisis” at all. If Europe just stops doing that and enforces its borders, Africa still sucks, but it isn’t infecting the rest of the world.

    Read More
  116. @Anonymous
    Yes.

    The only solution is derogation from the ECJ and ECHR and the re-assertion of national independence and sovereignty.

    Before the UK entered the EU - or for that matter acceded to the ECHR - the doctrine of 'parliamentary supremacy' ran writ in the UK. Basically, this means that no court, no judge etc can, in the final analysis, overrule the will of parliament. That's why there never ever were, until Tony Blair's time, any 'charter of individual rights' in the UK. Parliament was held to be the guarantor of citizen's rights.
    Wisely, by not having a written constitution or having courts that could possibly constrain parliament, or an enforceable 'bill of rights', the framers of the Westminster parliament knowingly and willing created a system that could smoothly react to the unpredictable crises thrown up by unknowable future events in a way that the most fitting course if action for the*nation* the highest and really only interest, could be taken without the national authority being hamstrung and tripped up by 'well meaning' but ultimately counteractive, legalistic measures.

    I agree with you on derogation.

    I cannot agree on your assertion of the disadvantages of a Constitution. The Bill of Rights is a life raft for US citizens. Furthermore, the Congress can, Constitutionally, pass any law it wants and remove it from the jurisdiction of court judgement. So, in effect, the Constitution is what Congress says it is.

    Since Congress, and the multi-cultural US are too divided to assert its Constitutional prerogatives, I doubt that abolishing the Constitution would do anything to preserve US liberties.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments are moderated by iSteve, at whim.


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.