The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
"Empowered" Woman Not Feeling So Empowered After Concept of "Perjury" Is Explained to Her
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From NPR:

Kavanaugh Accuser’s Classmate: ‘That It Happened Or Not, I Have No Idea’
September 20, 2018 7:57 AM ET
Domenico Montanaro – 2015

A former classmate of Christine Blasey Ford tells NPR that she does not know if an alleged sexual assault by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh took place as she first suggested on social media.

“That it happened or not, I have no idea,” Cristina King Miranda told NPR’s Nina Totenberg. “I can’t say that it did or didn’t.”

That’s different from what Miranda wrote Wednesday in a now-deleted Facebook post that stated definitively, “The incident DID happen, many of us heard about it in school.”…

“In my [Facebook] post, I was empowered and I was sure it probably did [happen],” Miranda told NPR. “I had no idea that I would now have to go to the specifics and defend it before 50 cable channels and have my face spread all over MSNBC news and Twitter.”

Miranda noted on Twitter that she did not have “first hand knowledge” of the incident.

To all media, I will not be doing anymore interviews. No more circus. To clarify my post: I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford mentions, and I stand by my support for Christine. That’s it. I don’t have more to say on the subject.

— Cristina King Miranda (@reinabori) September 19, 2018

Miranda said staff from the Senate Judiciary Committee had reached out to her, something she was not expecting. She said she will not go through with a committee interview if asked.

Miranda says she played soccer with Ford — whom she refers to as Chrissy — in high school and that she continues to support her. Miranda added that despite not knowing specifics of what went on at the party three decades ago, she remembers that there was a “buzz” that went around possibly on a weekend about the party where an alleged incident involving students from her school and Kavanaugh’s took place.

Hide 68 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anon[188] • Disclaimer says:

  2. So there was a “buzz” about this that everyone knew about, but Ford didn’t tell anyone until 2012, and also Ford herself didn’t know that there was this buzz about her. This story checks out for sure.

  3. theMann says:

    A lot easier to accuse some one of Witchcraft if they can’t fight back.

    It is almost like the protections af Anglo-Saxon law arose for a reason.

  4. J.Ross says: • Website

    And of course it’s the Jews, the Jews block all the emails in the world!

  5. I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford mentions, and I stand by my support for Christine. That’s it. I don’t have more to say on the subject.

    You’ll have to take me just the way that you find me

    What’s gone is gone and I do not give a damn

    I don’t remember, I don’t recall

    I got no memory of anything at all

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
  6. vinteuil says: • Website

    Talk about an own goal.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
  7. J.Ross says: • Website

    On Monday Sept. 17th, Christine Blasey Ford’s high school yearbooks suddenly disappeared from the web. I read them days before, knew they would be scrubbed, and saved them. Why did I know they would be scrubbed? Because if roles were reversed, and Christine Blasey Ford had been nominated for the Supreme Court by President Trump, the headline by the resistance would be this:


    And it would be an accurate headline. That’s why the yearbooks have been scrubbed. They are a testament to the incredible power these girls had over their teachers, parents and the boys of Georgetown Prep, Landon and other schools in the area. In the pages below, you will see multiple photos and references to binge drinking and the accompanying joy of not being able to remember any of it.

    https://cultofthe1st dot blog spot dot com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html?m=1
    In fairness, this sounds like normal stuff for the time, but we’re not the ones who wanted to pore over what happened in second period thirty-five years ago.

  8. Alfa158 says:

    “Empowered”. Adj. To believe you can get away with making stuff up because you aren’t under oath.

    • LOL: Daniel H
    • Replies: @El Dato
    , @anonymous
  9. Currahee says:

    “In my [Facebook] post, I was empowered…” ???!!!


    Anyone, class,…..Bueller?

    • Replies: @midtown
  10. Most of the social media discourse (left and right), which seems to be rubbing off onto mature adults who should know better, is at the 10th grade level, replete with skirmishing cliques, childish reasoning, and sketchy backbiting. What a shock, and what an embarrassment, that the nomination of a Supreme Court Justice hinges on literally 10th grade memories and feelings.

    Any man or woman who has led an energetic romantic life likely will have survived at least one irresolvable misunderstanding entailing bitter recriminations and lasting contempt by the former partner. It is difficult for the two parties to understand the rupture, and almost impossible for third parties to judge fairly. The problem is one magnitude worse for awkward adolescents. Their cognitive and emotional immaturity is widely acknowledged, and is the reason we do not try juveniles as adults.

    A friend of mine was a young journalist new to a legislative body and quickly learned of the personal dirt on many political actors. He was a crusader and wanted to expose those whose politics he disliked. A senior reporter explained to him that journalists weren’t interested in that, because it isn’t relevant to public policy and because there is personal dirt on everyone. When my friend objected that he was clean and had nothing to fear, the older reporter said, What about your family members? Your friends? Someone from high school who ended up in prison? Give me some time and I can dig up enough to destroy you, by association and innuendo if needed. Anyone can be smeared. So, we stay out of that entirely.

    How things have changed! Are there aForny adults left in the American elite?

    I’ll show you how it’s done.

    A vigorous JFK takes close notice of the political assets debuted by young Nancy of the Baltimore mafia D’Alesandr o family. Are birds of a feather cuddling in the same nest?

    (JFK and 20-year-old Nancy Pelosi. Please understand that this is satire meant to show that anyone can be smeared, and not a relevant or accurate way to judge Pelosi.)

    • Replies: @Dtbb
  11. 22pp22 says:

    Liberal woman.

    Mass assault rapes in Cologne – fui.

    Tens of thousands forced in prostitution and beaten across England – you’re a fascist if you notice.

    Californian psychology professor may have come into physical contact with a boy at a party thirty-five years ago when they were both kids, but no rape ensued (probably all in her imagination anyway) – trauma counselling required.

    If women are as fragile and weak as Blasey Ford, then they are too wet to leave the house ot have the vote

    Saudi Arabia is the way forward. It’s what Liberal women want.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  12. @vinteuil

    Disagree. She wanted to get it out there that she saw/knew about this. The MSM trumpeted that, but not her walk back.

  13. If I were a dimocrat I’d start worrying that rather than energizing the rad-fem vote in November the shenanigans of Feinstein, Ford, Miranda, et al. will have even the feeblest pro-Trump voters champing at the bit for electoral payback.

    When Cokey Roberts suggests that the latest dimocrat ploy is perhaps not such a good idea, you know the dimocrats have been boned and, better yet, have no one but themselves to blame.

    BTW, one my wilder ideas for an alt-right political thriller involves the SC advent of someone like BK causing one or more of the more senile current SC Justices to experience a totally incapacitating cerebral or cardiac event. (A man can dream, can’t he?)

    • Replies: @gunner29
    , @Forbes
  14. J.Ross says: • Website

    That’s not weakness, it’s cynical venality. I wish there was a way to punish the Republicans for their spinelessness here. Anons say:

    Another thread had an opinion piece that summed it up well. Gay marriage, abortion, nearly all of the left’s most cherished policies were enacted through judicial r[eview], and not democratic processes. The left sees the avenue to push their agenda slipping away as the court would have a 5-4 conservative majority with Kavanaugh. And god forbid (for them) that [Ruth Bader Ginsberg] died during Trump’s presidency, the court will be solidly conservative for decades to come.

    The real irony is Kavanaugh really was fairly moderate. Now he’s probably going to vote for overturning Roe v Wade just to spite liberals for putting him through all this [mess].

    That last bit would be nice but is unlikely. Another has some good stuff, but I think he is misusing the phrase “conflict of interest”:

    Ford has a conflict of interest:


    She also did a lot of quant work with an old lezzie from Stanford who consults with Big Pharma on how to quant-ify health care investment, meaning what diagnoses are the most or least lucrative. Ford, her mentor, and their whole circle were totally in support of Obamacare as absolute welfare for Big Pharma and Insurance.

    Ben Goldacre, the Guardian’s medical mythbusting expert columnist who goes jousting after homeopaths, has written about how there is no science (as any reasonable educated person would understand the word) in big pharma research. They are allowed to hide results they don’t like, to have as many tries as they need to get results that will look good in print, to tailor studies to get the right results, and sometimes (as in the case of Gardisil) to just skip testing. There’s an abundance of legitimate and defenseless targets here, but, given how the Trump administration has gone after the Sackler family, I don’t expect much.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Prof. Woland
  15. @J.Ross

    A blog post from a blog whose first and only entry is what you posted is even more believable that what I post. Thanks for the great find.

  16. Thomas says:

    It wouldn’t surprise me if this woman actually believes what she said. “Haven Monahan,” in all his guises, is sort of a legendary figure for American liberals at this point, sort of like the Wandering Jew. He can show up anywhere: on a Duke lacrosse team, at UVA, or in Supreme Court hearings. I would bet that if you took a sample of American liberals and told them Brett Kavanaugh (a name almost as good as “Haven Monahan” for the character) went to their school and had been accused of sexual assault, they’d say they remembered hearing about it too.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  17. The guys at Fash The Nation are calling this stuff “Box Wine Resistance”. That pretty much covers it.

    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
  18. Marty says:

    I called out a black dude for BART fare evasion about ten years ago. He spat on me. So I called the BART cops, and they caught him moseyin’ down the street a block away. Turned out he had a failure to appear for a previous evasion bust. As he was being cuffed he said to the officers, “why you always pickin’ on the black man?”

    • LOL: vinteuil
    • Replies: @Anon
  19. Jack D says:

    I was empowered

    What does “empowered” actually mean? Does it mean “I thought that I could get away with it?” “I was empowered to sit in Starbucks all day without buying anything.” ” I was empowered to walk down the middle of the road.”

    and I was sure it probably did

    Doubletalk anyone? Either you’re sure or you’re not. Sure that it is probable means not really sure.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    , @GW
    , @Jonathan Mason
  20. @Charles Pewitt

    You’ll have to take me just the way that you find me

    What’s gone is gone and I do not give a damn

    I don’t remember, I don’t recall

    I got no memory of anything at all


  21. Dave Pinsen says: • Website

    That title is hilarious. You should tweet it with a pic of her, Onion-style.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    , @Steve Sailer
  22. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Jack D

    What does “empowered” actually mean?
    Satiated beyond wanting to talk substantively or notice details, like when you buy a construction crew pizza as they work overtime, or require a white collar employees to do “flair” stuff.

  23. So have we reached Narrative Collapse on Kavaughgate yet? Just askin’.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  24. gunner29 says:
    @Jus' Sayin'...

    the shenanigans of Feinstein, Ford, Miranda, et al. will have even the feeblest pro-Trump voters champing at the bit for electoral payback.

    Texassian GOP just won a state senate seat that the Dims had held for 139 years! H! had won it by 12 points! Silent majority time again….

    I get the feeling a lot of the conservatives would crawl on their hands and knees thru burning gasoline, liberally sprinkled with broken beer bottles to vote this November. And I wouldn’t put it past the Dims to provide the bottles and fuel….their version of election fraud.

  25. @Anon

    I don’t have firsthand knowledge of the BART troubles but even if Black riders make up only 12% of BART’s riders, it looks like 41% of that 12% are Black.

  26. Marat says:

    Dr. Ford is willing to appear before the Committee. However, Dr Ford is not available Monday, due to pilates conflict. Please contact Mattress Girl Locum Tenens if this is an emergency.

    • Replies: @Pericles
  27. Cortes says:

    No dog (or bitch) in this fight* but it strikes me that the Blasey Ford allegations point right at the GOP’s backing amongst the Christian fundamentalist lobby:

    So, who will cast the first stone? That’s the dare the Democrats have put out.

    At Colonel Lang’s turcopolier blog there’s already a suggestion or more…

    *As a foreigner.

  28. Lowe says:

    Why would they keep data on the race of fare evaders cited? So they can get in trouble like this?

    • Replies: @Forbes
  29. MBlanc46 says:

    Make the slur. Then shut up. That’s all that it takes to destroy a man’s career.

  30. “Empowered” is what a woman becomes after fighting off the Patriarchy’s attempt to “silence” her.

  31. anon[207] • Disclaimer says:

    Empowerment is one of the Kübler-Röss-Fëmën stages of meme death. Late stage feminist leaders and their fellow travelers in academia and the media have empowered their minions to inflict opinions on the unenlightened. That means you, Unzists.

    Now, Drop and give Steve 20.

    • Replies: @Iberiano
  32. @Cagey Beast

    BTW, once again seeing a photo of Christine Blasey Ford’s attorney, reminds me that my first impression of her was “first runner-up in a Rachel Maddow look-alike contest”. And that is not meant as a compliment.

  33. Forbes says:

    Because the violation citation will have a physical description/identification section–just like any contact with the police will record/report.

    It’s only “get in trouble like this” if you think noticing reality is a bug rather than a feature…

    BTW, who’s shocked that Blacks commit nearly 50% of the infractions–pretty much in line with their proportion for more serious crimes…

    • Replies: @Lowe
  34. Dtbb says:
    @New Dealer

    I remember the feeling I had when I sent my first text message. I was at work and I got the feeling I was passing a note to a girl in middle school.

  35. Forbes says:
    @Jus' Sayin'...

    What is the likelihood that the rad-fem vote is already at its upper limit–that it’s not really possible to energize them any further?

    And alternatively–the working class whites that (seemingly) stayed home in 2012 is the demographic most likely to be energized, with more room to grow before reaching ots upper limit…

  36. I have an announcement to make.

    Charles Schumer tried to rape me.

    It was 50 years ago, at a Jewish summer camp in the catskills. I knew from the moment he looked down his glasses at me he was a predator.

    The reason Im saying this now is because, even though i am a strong, empowered woman who needs no mans help, I need a mans help to help me overcome my weak, unempowered state.

    I call upon the FBI to confine Schumer to jail pending an investigation and conviction. its the only way for my voice to be heard and justice to be done.

  37. GW says:
    @Jack D

    Yes, this was an interesting choice of words. In modern parlance, “empowered” connotes the ascendance of a minority group that had previously been unjustly shut out of social and political representation. The fact a liberal woman associates this ascendancy with the making of unproven and blatantly unfair assertions meant to destroy someone who happens to be “privileged” is quite telling. Liberals implicitly know the weaponization of identity politics is premised upon falsehood and revenge, not justice and truth.

  38. @Jack D

    What does “empowered” actually mean?

    In this context ‘empowered’ means ‘carried away’.

  39. J.Ross says: • Website
    @International Jew

    I think we can have that at any time by calling them out but I lack subtlety. The chatter is we’ll have it early next week. If there’s another week of nonsense after that we need to start serious discussions about something beyond mere discussion.

  40. Lowe says:

    I assume most fare evaders who are caught, are caught in the act. You don’t have to post “Wanted” posters for them. So, again, why collect statistics on offender’s race? So you can get harangued for it later?

  41. Anon[777] • Disclaimer says:

    I hit the BART panic buzzer when a crazy acting schitzo black guy was rampaging in a car. Security came and removed him. My mistake was not getting off at that point. After the doors closed a nicely groomed, non-fat young black woman pulled out a tiny gun and pointed it at me until the next stop. Weirdly, I was not afraid, because all my mental bandwidth was taken up thinking about whether it really was a gun or just a cigarette lighter or toy and considering all the factors related to that. I figured it was probably not a gun. Fortunately I had not heard of guns like this at the time:

    I can’t remember how it ended, but I suspect that she hightailed it out at the next stop. But yeah, in environments where the number of blacks reach a tipping point, it’s snitches get stitches, and social norms evaporate and the place goes to hell quite quickly. Call it Black Fraction Theory, after Smart Fraction Theory.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  42. Iberiano says:

    Agreed, even in our topsy-turvey, heads you lose, tails I win, world, simply due to the fact that words, titles, positions and all that, still matter, women are finding that claiming one thing on one hand (empowered, “Yes, I was the boss!”, etc) can have a social, financial, legal or corporate cost on the other–even if it is of course, less than it would be were it a man.

    I once worked at an organization that had several women “rise” to the top (via affirmative action, blow jobs, etc), and once in positions of authority, they kept screwing up basic, static organizational and administrative tasks, stuff that had no built in bias nor could be read as someone “out to get them”–and to a woman, they all claimed some variant of Hilary’s “what difference, at this point…” argument (this was about 10-15 years ago), basically that just because I am in a position of power, authority and status now (which was unearned) doesn’t mean I am actually responsible for carrying out those duties, tasks, goals. Completely detachment of accountability.

    This seems to be changing, due to our cultural, more men red pilling, and the demographic shift that necessitates women, on occasion, being held to some standard. Think Asia Argento.

  43. Whiskey says: • Website

    Never underestimate the power of female hysteria in the educated White classes. Never. I doubt there is an upper limit on the pussy hat wearing vote.

    • Replies: @Carbon blob
  44. @Dave Pinsen

    Where and when was that picture taken? Last year at Marienbad?

    • LOL: Kylie
    • Replies: @Dave Pinsen
  45. @Thomas

    “Haven Monahan,” in all his guises, is sort of a legendary figure for American liberals at this point, sort of like the Wandering Jew.

    More like the Wandering Anti-Semite.

    An Irish kid at a WASP school.

  46. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @Steve Sailer

    I don’t know, but it’s also her profile pic on Twitter, where she tweets in Spanish as well as English:

  47. Pericles says:

    They’re going to the mattresses for this one?

  48. Anon[302] • Disclaimer says:

    From the article:

    “It’s shocking,” said BART board Director Lateefah Simon. “It is, of course, very troubling.”

    This is the director of BART:

    Lateefah is the President of Akonadi Foundation, which nurtures movement building to advance racial justice in Oakland. A nationally recognized advocate for civil rights and racial justice, Lateefah brings over 20 years of executive experience advancing opportunities for communities of color and low-income communities in the Bay Area. She has received numerous awards for her work, including the MacArthur “Genius” Fellowship.

    Wikipedia says she’s a Kamala Harris buddy, and here’s her BART qualifications:

    She was elected to represent the seventh district on the Bay Area Rapid Transit District board of directors in 2016. Her motivations for running included her reliance on BART, as someone legally blind and unable to drive.

    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
  49. El Dato says:

    The author seems to be a bit hot under the collar, stuff is not half as bad as it is made out to be …

    Now scan the previous caption from pg.150 of Scribe 84, this time down the left side. The editors discuss a house party where, “we were confronted by…a pair of veiled terrorists, [two redacted names], were the guns real or did you just want to get served first?”

    Then turn back to pg. 148, where the two Holton girls are pictured in makeshift burqas, holding automatic pistols:

    This is the mid-80s. How come Burqas and Terrorism were even on the undeveloped mental maps of high-schoolers back then? (Setting: Lebanon barracks bombing took place in ’83)

    “We are auditioning for the Raiders of the Lost Ark Sequel”


  50. El Dato says:

    I was sure it probably did [happen]

    New concepts in phenomenology.

  51. El Dato says:

    “Silenced”: After you have to put up or shut up and you can’t put up.

  52. anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:

    The ‘under oath’ thing will be next to go. If you’ve just heard about something somewhere, that’ll be as good as proof, providing of course it supports The Narrative.

    Miranda wrote Wednesday in a now-deleted Facebook post that stated definitively, “The incident DID happen, many of us heard about it in school.”…

    “In my [Facebook] post, I was empowered and I was sure it probably did [happen],” Miranda told NPR. “I had no idea that I would now have to go to the specifics and defend it”

    Well if this isn’t eerily reminiscent of Jackie Coakley’s friends, way back when:

    Rachel Soltis, a suitemate of Jackie…is also quoted this way: “The university ignores the problem to make itself look better. They should have done something in Jackie’s case. Me and several other people know exactly who did this to her. But they want to protect even the people who are doing these horrible things.” (Washington Post)

    “Me and several other people know” That makes this so much simpler. Rachel Soltis et al merely have to testify, to be subpoenaed if necessary, and the ‘facts’ can come out. Verifiable assertions, anyway, since they “know who did these horrible things.”

    Rubin Erdely’s editor at Rolling Stone, Sean Woods, told the Post, “We did not talk to them. We could not reach them,” but, he said, “we verified their existence.” Woods told several outlets that the factchecking had been thorough and told the Post, “I’m satisfied that these guys exist and are real. We knew who they were.”

    All these witnesses who could testify that Haven Monahan & Co were real.
    Where are they now??

  53. Anonymous[367] • Disclaimer says:

    There’s also a black powder percussion cap version that is a non firearm and may be mail ordered to most states or purchased without a 4473. Either version can be carried in a cool belt buckle as well, which is lawful in open carry states while “going under the radar” as people figure it an ornament and therefore effectively hidden in plain sight.

    In the teens and 20s there were a large number of available micro-pistols and revolvers, most being marginally lethal and serving only to annoy or piss off a determined assailant, in 3 or 4 mm calibers.

    In a longer barreled firearm-often, a subcaliber adapter for a smallbore rifle-such rounds were effective for rat shooting at short range, or for wingshooting practice against large insects. It is much to be regretted that none have been made in a long generation.

    Several obsolete cartridges were in fact very useful and should, in my opinion and in that of many other people, be reintroduced. The 9mm rimfire shotshell (still readily available in Europe, not here), the .25 Stevens rimfire, the 32 gauge shotshell all come to mind.

  54. Anonymous[367] • Disclaimer says:

    (Big) Little Miss Muffett has a problem with “empowerment”.

    “I have to be honest, I don’t give a f***,” she says, sounding as though she really doesn’t. “First I didn’t know, because I don’t read my press, but when I kept being questioned about it I said, ‘If you’re going to walk around in your underwear, drunk, you’re asking for it.’ And they really jumped on me for that. Because the idea in this climate of pseudo-empowerment is that no means no. Well, I have news for you, girls. A stiff dick means yes.”

    Surely she is not saying the bikers were in their rights to rape her? “What I’m saying is that women think men are in control all the time, but men are weaker than women. And don’t mess with these guys because once it’s unleashed they can’t control themselves.” She checks herself. “That’s too profound for most people. I’ll get into real trouble if I start saying things like that. The point is: I shouldn’t have been there and I was. Why? Because I didn’t want to go home. I wanted experience. I was depressed and f***ed up, which is when bad things happen. Believe me, nobody in the history of mankind has ever made good choices on Quaaludes.”

  55. @Whiskey

    “Never underestimate the power of female hysteria in the educated White classes. Never. I doubt there is an upper limit on the pussy hat wearing vote.”

    It really is incredibly what happens to people when they don’t have actual real-life things to worry about.

  56. midtown says:

    Empowered: to get high on your own supply. Right?

  57. anonymous[404] • Disclaimer says:

    ” Gay marriage, abortion, nearly all of the left’s most cherished policies were enacted through judicial review, and not democratic processes. The left sees the avenue to push their agenda slipping away as the court would have a 5-4 conservative majority with Kavanaugh. ”

    Those are libertarian campaigns initially opposed by the far-left, and which the far-left is trying to claim credit for and pervert.

    The left is hysterical over Kavanaugh because they think he is a libertarian, and libertarians are kicking the totalitarian pseudo-progressives out of their own groups.

  58. @J.Ross

    They scrubbed the yearbooks, they scrubbed Dr. Ford’s page … so much work to do rewriting history, before the big show trial could begin. No wonder Commissar Feinstein had to sit on the “allegations” for so long.

    BTW, how does one go about scrubbing history from the internet? Sue the site’s publisher? Threaten the webmaster? Have lawyers attack the domain registrar? Or just quietly pull a few strings behind the scenes: favors, innuendoes, bribes, inducements, or just casual backscratching between old friends?

    Whatever way history gets dynamically rewritten in the internet age, it is a chilling lesson in the ephemeralness of digital “records”.

    The one true science fiction prophecy was the obscure young adult short story, “A Bowl of Biskies Makes Growing Boy”. Sure, “The Marching Morons” portrayed the future dumbed-down populace too, but “Biskies” showed that and more: hollowed out nutrition, government-media collusion, the Counter-Reality Narrative, fiction reversing fact, flash mobs of obedient media servants to persecute and kill dissidents and truth seekers.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
  59. @Almost Missouri

    BTW, how does one go about scrubbing history from the internet?

    I would take down or scrub the webpages, then get Google to make them not show up in search results. Information effectively does not exist if it cannot be found.

    Google just admitted that they let other apps read gmails, and that they considered altering their search algorithm after DJT’s travel ban, so I wouldn’t put this past them.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
  60. In our brave new feminized culture, “empowerment” apparently means taking people down with gossip and snitching, rather than forthright competition and confrontation.

    On a somewhat related point, since women allegedly do the same work for 40% less pay, it should be a simple get-rich-quick scheme to start an all-female company that would soundly thrash its competition on labor costs alone.

    But has there ever been a large scale female-only organization that was capable of actually getting things done? Or would such an organization inevitably collapse due to endless back-biting and surreptitious undermining of authority?

  61. @J.Ross

    The mother of all supreme court decisions would be one that required equal funding between men and women for medical care. Right now women use 30 – 40% more health care during their entire lifetimes (not just when pregnant) than men while at the same time outliving men by 5 years. In most areas you can measure, men have far worse outcomes. I believe that is what is called a disparate impact.

    By posing this a ‘civil right’ and going to the Supreme Court, it would completely bypass the political system that is terrified of being mean and sexist even if it is killing us. Liberals / feminists crowed about how ObamaCare required the insurance companies to not charge women more money for their premiums could come back to roost because they insist on equality. I say give them what they are demanding.

    • Agree: Dtbb
  62. @Jim Don Bob

    Okay, that makes sense if you own the pages, but what if you want third party pages scrubbed? Say for instance you are an elderly corrupt senator in cronified corrupt political party. You have a constituent with some allegations that can help your political objectives, but your constituent has a lot of skeletons in her closet which will start popping out as soon as her allegations become public. The constituent is an academic, so you want all her negative, insanity-impugning reviews to disappear. The allegations stem back to high school, when she was drunk slut, so you want online yearbooks to disappear. There are at least two or three third-parties you need to have compromise their publications for you. How do you do it? You have about five weeks until your deadline.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
  63. @Almost Missouri

    I do not know anything about, but if they are a lefty outfit, I’d just call them up and ask that the bad stuff disappear. Same thing with Google; they have already declared what side they are on and have talked openly about things they could do to help their side win. I’m sure they’d help.

    Probably not everything can be sanitized, but most of the techies have shown themselves to be lefties, and if you “adjust” the searches so only a few “fringe” websites show up, you can then say, “See! Just a bunch of right wingers.” The MSM will lap it up just like they did what this B said.

  64. It seems the Holton-Arms party-crazed schoolgirls back in the day listened to Jimmy Buffet and obeyed:

  65. @Anon

    Anon, I propose that when we finally pay reparations, we included free public transportation. There, problem solved.

  66. @Anon

    Right or wrong Lateefah has a lot of confidence and self-belief.

    Wypipo should try re-acquiring those traits someday.

  67. Well, the prospect of a perjury charge may have frightened off this would-be liar, but sadly it won’t have any effect on “Chrissy!” She’ll go into that hearing/forum/whatchamacallit – behind closed door, open session, with attorneys or without – and lie her friggin’ ass off. I’m sure HER [free!] legal counsel has told her that, since whatever she spews forth cannot be DISPROVEN, the bigger the lie, the better. Even if the despicable and totally useless Jeff Sessions had grounds to pursue a perjury charge against this One Woman SCOTUS Veto, he doesn’t have the balls.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.