The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Emily Lindin Is Right!
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Screenshot 2017-11-22 02.17.48

 
Hide 216 CommentsLeave a Comment
216 Comments to "Emily Lindin Is Right!"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. IHTG says:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Neoconned
    She's probably one of those stupid white girls that dates the rough looking ex con dudes w the tats & has a choke and spank fetish.....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /isteve/emily-lindin-is-right/#comment-2088858
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. guest says:

    What about innocent men of color?

    Or innocent men who are actually women?

    Obviously, Lindin is a racist tranophobe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Christian

    What about innocent men of color?
     
    You mean the innocent 2% of college population, but 50% of the rape complaints on-campus? The 'teens', the folks we don't discuss?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. TheBoom says:

    Haven has not been able pursue his dream of becoming an anti diversity officer due to the controversy

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Clyde says:

    Her important stuff as she lists it at twitter. Another Teen Vogue writer!

    @EmilyLindin
    writing a novel this month
    founder: #unslut project
    award-winning documentary filmmaker
    author: @wattpad & @zestbooks
    columnist: @teenvogue
    #nanowrimo
    unslutproject.com

    Here is the unslut book she wrote _____ https://www.amazon.com/UnSlut-Diary-Memoir-Emily-Lindin/dp/1942186002

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    She got a reputation for being a slut when she was 11 years old, because she let her boyfriend put his hand down her pants. That is kind of slutty, isn't it?

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/sep/21/unslut-project-against-sexual-bullying
    , @Forbes
    I wanna hear about the award she won for her documentary... Where everyone who enters gets a prize? Was it a re-purposed bowling trophy?
    , @guest
    I see several of her Amazon reviews are entirely about her tweet. One of which--can't tell whether or not it's a parody--says she's racist. Merely because the tweet talked about men in general instead of specifying white men.

    Good times.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Wow, that’s edgy

    Read More
    • Replies: @Altai
    I think she needed it, her Twitter bio sounds like every other dull, conformist but slightly smarter than average woman on Twitter. (I'm quirky in exactly the same way as all my class peers have agreed is currently most popular to be!) Has anyone made a generator for bios like this?

    Twanger of stringed things on the West End production of @OurLadiesLDN || Life metaphors, puns & positivity.
     
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    https://youtu.be/Q-X0nUDEb_Y?t=15s
    , @Opinionator
    Steve is on a tear this week.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Altai says:
    @27 year old
    Wow, that's edgy

    I think she needed it, her Twitter bio sounds like every other dull, conformist but slightly smarter than average woman on Twitter. (I’m quirky in exactly the same way as all my class peers have agreed is currently most popular to be!) Has anyone made a generator for bios like this?

    Twanger of stringed things on the West End production of @OurLadiesLDN || Life metaphors, puns & positivity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malcolm X-Lax
    She does get points for not warning people just how snarky she can be.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    I can’t say I care much about people I don’t know losing their jobs, anywhere, though it doesn’t make me happy either. At a certain point, saying you “don’t care” loudly enough is actually saying you’re glad about it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Jake says:

    The last truly believing Bolsheviks in the USSR, even after its death, told tales about how the Tsars raped all the women and girls in their villages and executed millions and imprisoned incalculable numbers and how, on the other hand, the Revolution brought freedom, equality, justice: the perfect reversal of brutal tyranny.

    Our Leftists are no more sane, no more logical, no more grounded in reality, no more moral, that were all those Bolsheviks who graced the world with the Gulag. Our Leftists are no more sane, no more logical, no more moral than were Mao and his Cultural Revolutionaries.

    Therefore, no Emily Linden will learn anything from any of this. Instead, they will look for more heterosexual white males from whom to take a pound of flesh.

    The funny part is that the aspiring Ismail the Bloodthirstys, who are everywhere in the worlds of delightfully black and/or Mohammedan peoples, are already salivating at the thought of adding stupid sluts like her to their list of concubines.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. L Woods says:

    She’s only saying what every attention seeking thot and their endless male enablers are thinking and projecting in deed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. The important thing is to stay out of it while they attack themselves, if they start thinking about how we are enjoying this because it mostly liberal men and jewish men they will start withholding the stories on those men and only publishing stories on our guys (do we have any guys left). If you cant resist then be like a channer and target their guys as if you’re a leftist. just resist the public schadenfreude.Remember they are doing our work for us men and good women are watching this.And of course a few of these guys are creeps no one should want around.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. bomag says:

    I don’t know whether to think of this humorously –”round up the usual suspects”

    or more darkly — “show me the man, I’ll show you the crime”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. AndrewR says:

    I’m never disgusted by disgusting tweets or comments per se. It’s seeing hundreds or thousands of “likes” that is disgusting.

    Here is this evil person trying to play victim now:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/EmilyLindin/status/933132157786009600

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    Her tweets are protected now (only her followers can see them). I wonder if iSteve's post had anything to do with that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. what about abusive women bosses? Those who berate their subordinates. Arbitrarily fire or refuse to hire. Real harm has been done to real people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. rogue-one says:

    One could also say:

    “Here’s an unpopular opinion: I’m actually not at all concerned about white men losing their jobs over false racism allegations”

    “Here’s an unpopular opinion: I’m actually not at all concerned about urban riots over false racism allegations”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. Neoconned says:
    @IHTG
    https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/933277138723094528

    She’s probably one of those stupid white girls that dates the rough looking ex con dudes w the tats & has a choke and spank fetish…..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. @27 year old
    Wow, that's edgy

    Read More
    • LOL: bomag
    • Replies: @El Dato
    Bunker Ledge Maintenance matters! Serious business.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    Oh, man! Now you've instigated another upcoming post about golf course design, and the fact that certain people are still complaining because they were kept out of the sand traps where the WASPS would socialize and smoke pot until the end of segregation ... or something like that ... ;-}
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Arclight says:

    Modern feminism – all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise…and even then, it’s probably only a matter of time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thea
    White men only. And perhaps some Asian and Hispanics.

    Black football players and Arab migrants are free to do as they please.
    , @Tim Howells
    Like everything else it depends a lot on race. If you're White, then if you give your girlfriend a dirty look, that just might be rape! On the other hand an African style gang rape is probably just a cultural misunderstanding and not worth mentioning. In fact even mentioning it is racist and also sexist since shows that you think White women are your personal property. I've actually had several lectures on this from highly qualified feminists so let me know if you need anything cleared up.
    , @Kylie
    "Modern feminism – all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise…and even then, it’s probably only a matter of time."

    All white men.
    , @bomag
    I knew a school administrator in a large district who was handling a discrimination claim from the usual, largish, WOC. She was ranting on about all the discrimination in her life when he asks her, "have I done anything to suggest I'm racist?" and she replied, "not yet".
    , @kihowi
    Correction: We will assume all men are rapists and wife beaters, unless it's probable that they actually are rapists and wife beaters (muslims, blacks). Then they're sexy.

    But if it's probable that they're not (goody two shoes white guys), we'll scream it even louder.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. So the guilty ones in positions of power who are socio- or psycho- pathically able to beat the rap grow in numbers while continuing to have their way with women like her?

    Winning!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. L Woods says:

    Is it plain enough yet that the subjugation of women is as integral to civilization as the planting of grains and the division of labor?

    Read More
    • Disagree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    Is it plain enough yet that the subjugation of women is as integral to civilization as the planting of grains and the division of labor?
     
    No it isn't. For centuries Christianity treated women well. It is the post-Christian feminist heresy that endorses the supremacist ideology they demand.

    Subjugation of women is rule in the rest of humanity. Your animosity is directed at the wrong target.
    , @Neil Templeton
    The ballad is not yet resolved, but I pose that if either sex may behave with impunity, civil life suffers.
    , @Tim Howells
    Actually it's even far worse than that. These anti-feminist conspiracies go back long before civilization, and even across species. See the strict enforcement of traditional gender roles among apes and in lion and wolf packs, just for example. Feminism can only triumph in the end by obliterating all life down to the amoeba level and starting over from there.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Here’s an unpopular opinion: I’m actually not at all concerned about fecund females who can’t come to terms with the fact that they share a jungle with males whom nature compels to mount them.

    Deal with it ladies. We males have to carry our seeds around in a sack, so the least you could do is make your choice: stand by civilized men, who have self-control, or continue to signal your virtues to those who would truly rape you.

    Bikinis or burkas. It’s up to you.

    Read More
    • Agree: Thea
    • Replies: @DFH
    Why so keen to have your daughter/sister/wife be harassed by a fat Jew or black congressman?
    , @Samuel Skinner
    Or the reactionaries are right and women on the whole aren't capable of rational thought. Don't feel bad ladies, most men aren't either.
    , @Louis Renault

    Bikinis or burkas. It’s up to you.
     
    Meme of the day.
    , @Anon
    I know it may be an unpopular opinion here, but if women have been dressing to attract men in one way or another for the last couple hundred years in western civilization, it's because they find the men hard to attract. If it was easy, they wouldn't go through all the bother. If all women took off their makeup and dressed in average clothes, only a small percentage would be considered good-looking by men. Women did not dress in a fashion to sexually attract men back in the day of the arranged marriage. They used to dress more modestly back in the Middle Ages and in previous times. They only started really dressing up once they were expected to find their mates themselves because they felt it wouldn't work otherwise.

    The goal isn't just to attract a man's eyes, it's to get him to make a commitment to marriage. The latter has always been hard for woman. Before the modern era, young people went through a long engagement to find out whether they were compatible or not, and engagements were still broken right and left in those days. In this era, plenty of men refuse to marry or have kids if they can get sex for free without a commitment. The financial investment women make in trying to get a commitment out of a man has always been huge in proportion to her income, when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl's working salary, which is never that high at any sort of starter job. In the days of the arranged marriage, many men would refuse to commit if it wasn't for a financial sum given to him provided by her family, which was called a dowry. Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.
    , @Buffalo Joe
    Buzz, too funny, more than a LOL.
    , @Bernardista
    Comments like these are why I love this blog.

    I agree in principle, but in the summer can't I at least have a light-colored burka with a few vents?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. @27 year old
    Wow, that's edgy

    Steve is on a tear this week.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    Steve is on a tear this week.
     
    It has been much longer than a week.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. Taco says:

    The coalition of the fringes will not be able to avoid these colliding narratives forever. Ms. Lindin is basically saying that Emmitt Till deserved to die. Because patriarchy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @rogue-one
    Nope.

    The hierarchy is
    0. Jews
    1. Blacks
    2. Hispanic women
    3. Hispanic men
    4. Pakis
    5. White women
    6. East Asians
    7. White men

    Nobody is allowed to criticize or hurt people above them in hierarchy. If a bunch of asian men in UK do rape white women, then the women must shut up for the good of multiculturalism.

    However, if a white man does anything, you are allowed to raise hell.

    The coalition of fringes seems like a neo-caste system in practice.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. DFH says:
    @Buzz Mohawk
    Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm actually not at all concerned about fecund females who can't come to terms with the fact that they share a jungle with males whom nature compels to mount them.

    Deal with it ladies. We males have to carry our seeds around in a sack, so the least you could do is make your choice: stand by civilized men, who have self-control, or continue to signal your virtues to those who would truly rape you.

    Bikinis or burkas. It's up to you.

    Why so keen to have your daughter/sister/wife be harassed by a fat Jew or black congressman?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

    Why so keen to have your daughter/sister/wife be harassed by a fat Jew or black congressman?
     
    I'm not.

    In another comment, I mentioned joie de vivre, a concept that seems to be foreign to many people now. Before the types you mention were coddled in my country, it was possible to just enjoy the dance between women and men without turning it all into another terrorized universe of paranoia.

    Maybe this is just another version of The War on Terror. The old America is gone, replaced by fear.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. I wonder how the falsely accused Duke lacrosse players (Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty, and David Evans) would feel about that?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. jim jones says:

    Men can only take so much provocation:

    Read More
    • LOL: Forbes
    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    Jim, best video ever, thank you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Thea says:
    @Arclight
    Modern feminism - all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise...and even then, it's probably only a matter of time.

    White men only. And perhaps some Asian and Hispanics.

    Black football players and Arab migrants are free to do as they please.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @Arclight
    Modern feminism - all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise...and even then, it's probably only a matter of time.

    Like everything else it depends a lot on race. If you’re White, then if you give your girlfriend a dirty look, that just might be rape! On the other hand an African style gang rape is probably just a cultural misunderstanding and not worth mentioning. In fact even mentioning it is racist and also sexist since shows that you think White women are your personal property. I’ve actually had several lectures on this from highly qualified feminists so let me know if you need anything cleared up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Runshyt
    You’re really full of it! If anything, men of color are always...always...ALWAYS...guilty until proven innocent. But your white male fragility permits you to make up garbage. Your post is a hot, steaming load of bs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Symbiosis, or Takes Two to Tangle

    Steve Sailer / Emily Lindin
    Tucker Carlson / Jack Evans
    Harlem Globetrotters / Washington Generals

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. eah says:

    Amazing 3-tweet story.

    (((white supremacy)))

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thea
    This should send chills down the back of all white people but I don't think anything will at this point.

    But collective guilt can boomerang. It maybe someday a different group will be getting their's.


    Also she is bitter than attractive white men do not want to commit to her promiscuous self.

    , @Forbes
    These fuck-wits believe "disproportionately accused" can only result from racism, so next up will be an amnesty rather than a "one free grope" rule...
    , @Ivy
    Who bitch this is?

    Look in the dictionary and see Emily Lindin's picture.
    , @ic1000
    Fringe-fraying!
    , @eah
    https://twitter.com/JonathanTurley/status/934070705767047169
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Barnard says:

    Her Twitter profile says she is writing a novel and is the founder of the unslut project. You have to wonder if this was a calculated effort to attract attention and increase her visibility online. She also could just be that mentally deranged, or it could be a combination of the two.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    She was shilling/fishing for content on Reddit (30th April 2013)
    She was dumb and evasive back then too.

    yourlegsgrow 6 points 4 years ago
    Do the people in your posts know that you are posting about them? Are you still friends with any of them?

    TheUnSlutProject[S] 18 points 4 years ago
    I am not close friends with any of the people in my posts, but we're friends through social media, and for the most part they've grown up into really admirable people. I am writing under a pen name for just that reason - I don't want them or anyone else to find out who the characters are. The point of The UnSlut Project is not to villainize them or anyone else, and I wouldn't want to cause them any guilt or pain now.
     
    /too late you silly cow.

    GiveJesusPants -1 points 4 years ago
    ... I'm having a hard time believing that the author is publishing her 11-year old private thoughts "word-for-word" while implementing techniques in her writing like foreshadowing and metaphors, and using words like "tentatively" and "communal."
    TheUnSlutProject[S] 11 points 4 years ago
    This makes me kind of wish I weren't writing under a pen name, so my actual 6th-grade English teacher could take some credit for her good work!
    Believe it or not, that's the way I wrote as an 11-year-old.
     
    /humblebrag FTW
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Emily Lindin’s carefree insouciance regarding the treatment of innocent men in regards to improper behaviour is an indication that Fourth Wave Feminism has brought evil upon the earth. This distaff bitch Emily Lindin says she don’t give a rat’s ass if innocent men are fired during this current improper behaviour witch hunt. Feminism has always been most foul, but man-hating broads like Emily Lindin have eliminationist intentions for most men.

    Patriotic men remember that White Women Without College Degrees supported Trump in the 2016 presidential election. White Women With College Degrees went slightly in Hillary Clinton’s favor. Men must not be seen as attacking all women when we respond to the anti-man provocations of nasty feminist tarts such as Emily Lindin.

    Emily Lindin and the rest of the anti-man Fourth Wave Feminists in the Democrat Party want to cut men’s nuts off with a rusty lawn mower blade. These 4th Wave gals are mean bastards who will not hesitate to butcher every man they can get their paws on. Not every smiling broad in a pussy hat is a harmless creature screeching out some stupid nonsense. Some of these murderous broads have evil plans in store for all men, whether the men are decent or not.

    Weaponized White Women who have joined the anti-man cult have taken over a small faction of the Democrat Party. It is up to brave patriotic men and women who love America to stop these 4th Wave Feminist Thugs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Exactly right, my friend. I'm proud to report that my wife and my mother both supported Trump and never even considered Clinton. These women are not the problem, and they share our contempt for women who hate men and everything normal.
    , @dr kill
    The Guardian article she wrote claims sexual activity at age 11. Man, she was a smokin hot 14 yo. But the past 40 lbs haven't done her any favors.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Curle says:

    Who, whom.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. Art Deco says:

    She made her tweets private.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    This is the pattern with nasty women: they talk a lot of trash no man would say and then they fold when the reaction comes in. See Hillary Clinton's election night behaviour for details.

    I just wish they'd invented social media forty years ago. Maybe we could have avoided a lot of this mess if the Megaphone got a healthy dose of backtalk every time it tried to push this stuff.

    , @Jake
    Typical cowardly, hypocritical Liberal.
    , @Tony Lawless
    In my opinion, a girl's tweets should ALWAYS be kept private.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Mr. Anon says:

    Ms. Lindin is the founder of the “UnSlut Project”, an effort to de-stigmatize the word “slut”. I suppose the goal is to normalize slutdom. Slut Liberation! This is what passes for meaningful and useful work in our present Age of Crap.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. Tiny Duck says:

    Not really all that of a controversial opinion. Most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their positions as is their custom

    Men of Color respect women so it is implied Ms Lindin didn’t mean ALL MEN just white men rapists

    You guys are monsters

    Ms. Lindin had to lock her twitter account after the abuse she received from right wing trolls

    Twitter needs to protect women from virtual abuse and hatred

    Read More
    • Replies: @fish

    Ohs Tinys.....memeber we'll had dat talk.....bout you thinkin U was'n a wimmin .....o at least doing wimmin things! ya....yous rememberz.


    Lnertz "I beinz a Doktor ob teh brain" Pitz
     
    , @Buffalo Joe
    TD, ....."most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their power." Recent history, Barack Obama and Eric Holder and any one of dozens of African dictators proves you wrong.
    , @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    Not really all that of a controversial opinion. Most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their positions as is their custom

    Men of Color respect women
     

    You're not even trying to sound believable now.
    , @Forbes
    All women are helpless, according to Tiny Dick:

    Twitter needs to protect women from virtual abuse and hatred
     
    Simply ban all women from Twitter and other social media--for their own protection and safety. Virtual abuse and hatred could lead to virtually anything...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. @Buzz Mohawk
    Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm actually not at all concerned about fecund females who can't come to terms with the fact that they share a jungle with males whom nature compels to mount them.

    Deal with it ladies. We males have to carry our seeds around in a sack, so the least you could do is make your choice: stand by civilized men, who have self-control, or continue to signal your virtues to those who would truly rape you.

    Bikinis or burkas. It's up to you.

    Or the reactionaries are right and women on the whole aren’t capable of rational thought. Don’t feel bad ladies, most men aren’t either.

    Read More
    • Agree: Kylie
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. @Art Deco
    She made her tweets private.

    This is the pattern with nasty women: they talk a lot of trash no man would say and then they fold when the reaction comes in. See Hillary Clinton’s election night behaviour for details.

    I just wish they’d invented social media forty years ago. Maybe we could have avoided a lot of this mess if the Megaphone got a healthy dose of backtalk every time it tried to push this stuff.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Buzz Mohawk
    Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm actually not at all concerned about fecund females who can't come to terms with the fact that they share a jungle with males whom nature compels to mount them.

    Deal with it ladies. We males have to carry our seeds around in a sack, so the least you could do is make your choice: stand by civilized men, who have self-control, or continue to signal your virtues to those who would truly rape you.

    Bikinis or burkas. It's up to you.

    Bikinis or burkas. It’s up to you.

    Meme of the day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Romanian
    Wasn't there a theory making the rounds on how women are actually choosing "burqas", because mating patterns today have led them into an exhausting arms race (effort, money, self-mutilation and resentment if getting older and alone or if never particularly blessed in the first place) for the attention of a few high value men and an increasing number of them find the "burqa" to be a valuable respite from a battle they are too tired to fight anymore or were never going to win?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Buzz Mohawk
    Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm actually not at all concerned about fecund females who can't come to terms with the fact that they share a jungle with males whom nature compels to mount them.

    Deal with it ladies. We males have to carry our seeds around in a sack, so the least you could do is make your choice: stand by civilized men, who have self-control, or continue to signal your virtues to those who would truly rape you.

    Bikinis or burkas. It's up to you.

    I know it may be an unpopular opinion here, but if women have been dressing to attract men in one way or another for the last couple hundred years in western civilization, it’s because they find the men hard to attract. If it was easy, they wouldn’t go through all the bother. If all women took off their makeup and dressed in average clothes, only a small percentage would be considered good-looking by men. Women did not dress in a fashion to sexually attract men back in the day of the arranged marriage. They used to dress more modestly back in the Middle Ages and in previous times. They only started really dressing up once they were expected to find their mates themselves because they felt it wouldn’t work otherwise.

    The goal isn’t just to attract a man’s eyes, it’s to get him to make a commitment to marriage. The latter has always been hard for woman. Before the modern era, young people went through a long engagement to find out whether they were compatible or not, and engagements were still broken right and left in those days. In this era, plenty of men refuse to marry or have kids if they can get sex for free without a commitment. The financial investment women make in trying to get a commitment out of a man has always been huge in proportion to her income, when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary, which is never that high at any sort of starter job. In the days of the arranged marriage, many men would refuse to commit if it wasn’t for a financial sum given to him provided by her family, which was called a dowry. Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

    Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.
     
    Marriage yes, sex no.

    Women continue to pretty themselves up long after they have captured a mate. That's because they enjoy it, and because they want their mate to continue shtupping them.

    There is a thing called joie de vivre. When you live in the amazing, developed world the White Man has built, life is not only about surviving and reproducing. You can actually spend some resources on looking good and fucking. Why do you think everyone else wants to come here?
    , @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.
    , @Thea
    Historically, in England only nobles had arranged marriages. The peasants were free to choose as little money was involved. average men married average women.

    Make up has been used to manipulate men for millennia.

    This problem began in the 20th century due to increased wealth and new ideologies.
    , @Flip

    Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.
     
    It is harder to achieve if you want the same top of the heap male that everyone else wants, but I think a non-obese, fertile white female can get married pretty readily if she is willing to settle. If she's fat or too old, then it is different.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Kylie says:
    @Arclight
    Modern feminism - all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise...and even then, it's probably only a matter of time.

    “Modern feminism – all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise…and even then, it’s probably only a matter of time.”

    All white men.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    To the standard Feminist, all white heterosexual men are rapists at least at heart. To see white gay men as rapists would be homophobia.

    Non-white men, conversely, are innocent victims of white men falsely accusing them of rape.
    , @nebulafox
    Which reminds me: we've got our secret 2100 meeting with the Asian males to discuss how we will coordinate intelligence efforts on how to reinforce patriarchy. The primary subject of discussion will be the imminent and already here threat of the most natural ally of Western feminism: millions of Muslim migrants and their burka wearing, liberated multiple wives. Also on topic will be how we can further doctor statistics that, though insidious and ingenious efforts, show that intersectional allies, such as young African-American males in the ghetto, end up doing some not-so-feminist things.

    Don't be late. I'm sure we can keep this new Pokemon privilege point sharing arrangement with them going. I know that we've dominated the world and all of that because our ancestors kicked a lot of butts and built Western civilization, but in times of famine, the devil feeds on flies. Coffee out front, soju and BBQ in the back, strippers will arrive at midnight after the meeting adjourns. And remember: Putin is organizing it all, as he does everything in the world. So don't say anything positive about Russians.

    (The above is semi-sarcastic.)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Whiskey says: • Website

    Translation from female to English: “I HATE HATE HATE beta males, and any false rape accusations because women regret having sex with them is right and just because they are icky beta males. Tom Brady please call me.”

    Contra Steve, there is no end of ways in which most women are the enemy of most (Beta Male) White men. All women want is to criminalize beta males even looking at them and exalt Alpha males. And it always happens when women are made men’s equal. There is nothing women despise and find innate disgust for than men their equal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Women ARE our equals. What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.
    , @Corvinus
    "Contra Steve, there is no end of ways in which most women are the enemy of most (Beta Male) White men."

    Some woman really did a number on you, and a result you have to craft a narrative that is so ludicrous on its face that it offers you comfort.

    "All women want is to criminalize beta males even looking at them and exalt Alpha males. And it always happens when women are made men’s equal. There is nothing women despise and find innate disgust for than men their equal."

    You would rather project your own insecurities rather than deal with the reality that some women, just like some men, have major relationship issues.
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    Let your trauma go Whiskey. You are having zero affect upon her. And you have let her define you.

    You are drinking poison, and assuming it will harm your former lover. It will only kill you.
    , @Forbes
    Absolutely.
    , @The True and Original David
    Every now and then, I check in to see if Whiskey has been been laid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Jake says:
    @Art Deco
    She made her tweets private.

    Typical cowardly, hypocritical Liberal.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Jake says:
    @Kylie
    "Modern feminism – all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise…and even then, it’s probably only a matter of time."

    All white men.

    To the standard Feminist, all white heterosexual men are rapists at least at heart. To see white gay men as rapists would be homophobia.

    Non-white men, conversely, are innocent victims of white men falsely accusing them of rape.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. nebulafox says:
    @Kylie
    "Modern feminism – all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise…and even then, it’s probably only a matter of time."

    All white men.

    Which reminds me: we’ve got our secret 2100 meeting with the Asian males to discuss how we will coordinate intelligence efforts on how to reinforce patriarchy. The primary subject of discussion will be the imminent and already here threat of the most natural ally of Western feminism: millions of Muslim migrants and their burka wearing, liberated multiple wives. Also on topic will be how we can further doctor statistics that, though insidious and ingenious efforts, show that intersectional allies, such as young African-American males in the ghetto, end up doing some not-so-feminist things.

    Don’t be late. I’m sure we can keep this new Pokemon privilege point sharing arrangement with them going. I know that we’ve dominated the world and all of that because our ancestors kicked a lot of butts and built Western civilization, but in times of famine, the devil feeds on flies. Coffee out front, soju and BBQ in the back, strippers will arrive at midnight after the meeting adjourns. And remember: Putin is organizing it all, as he does everything in the world. So don’t say anything positive about Russians.

    (The above is semi-sarcastic.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Brabantian says: • Website

    A relevant heart-rending story, singificantly deep-sixed by mainstream media more than usual

    30-year-old Angelica Wiktor of Vittaryd, Sweden, a lesbian, has apparently killed herself after being raped by two neighbour migrant males – alleged ‘Syrians’ (often a false nationality claim by migrants in Europe) – and after the Swedish authorities declined to prosecute the men, despite Angelica’s personal testimony to police, medical authorities verifying she was raped, & the men continuing to stalk & harass her

    Apparently Angelica shared her story on Facebook before deliberately overdosing on drugs

    The story is all over various ‘rightist’ websites in multiple languages … but it seems even semi-mainstream media are not touching it

    It’s quite profound how a compelling story like this is hidden by alleged ‘news media’, making clear we have a bifurcated news ‘reality’ about key occurrences that expose the horror of Western governmental systems at their worst

    One comment seen about this, is that obviously the ‘sh-tlibs’ in fact don’t really care at all about women, as they claim to do

    The now-suicided lesbian had originally been pleased to have ‘refugees’ given a home nearby

    Read More
    • LOL: fish
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    I do feel terrible for that poor woman. But why couldn't she simply move to a different city and apply to immigrate elsewhere, rather than killing herself?

    Alternately, no decent person would have begrudged it if she had killed the rapists instead of herself. After all, why should SHE have to leave her home while the attackers stay where they please.

    , @bomag
    Reminds us again of the adage that you do not want a society wholly dependent upon the police for civil order.

    I can't say America trends any better. We've got a Somali walking around Minneapolis after gunning down a blonde. Diplomatic immunity, I guess; or divine right of kings.
    , @Peterike
    “The now-suicided lesbian had originally been pleased to have ‘refugees’ given a home nearby.”

    Another Poetic Justice Warrior. Sad.
    , @Peter Lund
    I found very few *contemporary* references to her death on "alt-right" websites. Here's one:

    https://petterssonsblogg.se/2017/06/20/angelica-ar-dod-och-garningsmannen-gar-fria/

    The other references (all over Europe, in many languages) seem to be from November, possibly due to pettersonblog writing about her again, possibly due to an independent journalist posting on Facebook (see links at the bottom):

    https://petterssonsblogg.se/2017/11/12/angelica-tog-sitt-liv-nar-hennes-valdtaktsanmalan-lades-ner-valdtaktsmannen-adnan-som-fatt-en-chans-i-sverige-gar-helt-fri/



    This is her Facebook page:

    https://www.facebook.com/angelica.wiktor


    ---

    There's nothing about her on Snaphanen, Avpixlat, or Uriasposten.

    Snaphanen is a multi-lingual Scandinavian website about immigration problems (amongst other things), run by a Dane who used to live in Sweden so he speaks/reads fluent Swedish and has a deep interest in Swedish affairs. The rest of us Danes find written Swedish a bit hard: it's like reading Scots or Shakespeare. You can do do it but only if you concentrate hard. Multi-lingual doesn't mean "translated into your favourite language". It means "sometimes in Danish, sometimes in Swedish".

    The name comes from a Danish resistance movement in Scania after Sweden conquered it in the 1600's.


    Avpixlat was a Swedish website about immigration. The name means "depixelated" and is a reference to the Swedish practice of blacking out, pixelating or even photoshopping the skin colour of criminals on photos and in videos. It recently rebranded itself and relaunched under the name Samhällsnyt (News about Society). If you want to look at the old stuff, you have to use archive.org with the http://avpixlat.info/ URL.


    She isn't mentioned on Uriasposten, either.

    Uriasposten is a play on words: Urias (Uriah) was ordered by King David to fight in a place where he was guaranteed to be killed. An "uriaspost" is a position that is guaranteed to cause trouble for the person holding that position/job. "-Posten" is also a common suffix in newspaper names, similar to "Washington Post".

    Those three websites usually have all the interesting immigration/crime news in Scandinavia so I'm surprised they didn't write about her.

    (Not that they are the only ones in Scandinavia!)

    ---

    Here's some background info on the case by an independent journalist:

    https://www.facebook.com/joakim.lamotte/photos/a.721663931261534.1073741829.713993068695287/1544068305687755/?type=3

    https://www.facebook.com/joakim.lamotte/photos/pb.713993068695287.-2207520000.1511184936./1552975321463720/?type=3

    The rape story seems to be correct but it would have been hard to get a conviction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. NOTA says:

    Too bad nobody ever taught her to think in terms of incentives, or she’d have asked herself how men would feel about hiring, promoting, and working with women in a world where baseless sexual harassment claims from any woman could wreck their career. Mike Pence’s rules are a pale shadow of what you would see in such a world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dearieme
    Good point. Mr Pence should be awarded a prize for his prudent foresight.
    , @Anonymous
    That might be the subconscious end game. To drive men out of the workforce and the economy, and remake everything in a way that suits female psychology and biology.

    Men find working with women uncomfortable. And the reverse is true as well.

    When men controlled society, women were barefoot and in the kitchen. Not threatening their careers.

    Now women subconsciously want most men in their pajamas and playing videogames. Not threatening their careers.
    , @RadicalCenter
    You're right.

    Pence's rules are wise nowadays. I never allow myself to be in a room with any female under age sixty with the door closed at the workplace. Never. Prefer not to be in a room alone with any female at work even with the door open.

    , @anon
    I run a (mostly unsuccessful) software startup, but when I talk with my partner about having to hire, the main thing we've come up with is this: we shouldn't hire women for technical roles. Either (a) she's an SJW who's a "woman in tech!" and could sink the company when her incompetence shows or (b) she's not, but not really any better than a man. Where's the upside?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Thea says:
    @eah
    Amazing 3-tweet story.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH0V4AExFqC.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH3VoAE0jjm.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH1U8AEzxBh.jpg

    (((white supremacy)))

    This should send chills down the back of all white people but I don’t think anything will at this point.

    But collective guilt can boomerang. It maybe someday a different group will be getting their’s.

    Also she is bitter than attractive white men do not want to commit to her promiscuous self.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. fish says:
    @Tiny Duck
    Not really all that of a controversial opinion. Most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their positions as is their custom

    Men of Color respect women so it is implied Ms Lindin didn't mean ALL MEN just white men rapists

    You guys are monsters

    Ms. Lindin had to lock her twitter account after the abuse she received from right wing trolls

    Twitter needs to protect women from virtual abuse and hatred

    Ohs Tinys…..memeber we’ll had dat talk…..bout you thinkin U was’n a wimmin …..o at least doing wimmin things! ya….yous rememberz.

    Lnertz “I beinz a Doktor ob teh brain” Pitz

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    That new Crocodile in Zimbabwe or Lumumbaville would eat Tinys for breakfast and wipe the fat off his lips with his shirt sleeve.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. This kind of all out assault on the sons of mothers is going to turn otherwise normie women into valkyries that give the term “helicopter mom” a whole new meaning.

    The casual “tee hee who cares if men are destroyed” reaction has to activate some neural impulse in women with sons that cause them to react like a t rex guarding the nest.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    My Italian Mom, even at her advanced age, would have no problem strangling the life out of any woman who falsely accused me and ruined my life. I mean that literally. I love ya, Mom.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. rogue-one says:
    @Taco
    The coalition of the fringes will not be able to avoid these colliding narratives forever. Ms. Lindin is basically saying that Emmitt Till deserved to die. Because patriarchy.

    Nope.

    The hierarchy is
    0. Jews
    1. Blacks
    2. Hispanic women
    3. Hispanic men
    4. Pakis
    5. White women
    6. East Asians
    7. White men

    Nobody is allowed to criticize or hurt people above them in hierarchy. If a bunch of asian men in UK do rape white women, then the women must shut up for the good of multiculturalism.

    However, if a white man does anything, you are allowed to raise hell.

    The coalition of fringes seems like a neo-caste system in practice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    Rogue, nice try, but add, Gays, Trans, Bi and Questioning in any order above White men.
    , @biz
    If Jews are at the top of that progressive stack, how do you explain the current popularity of Linda Sarsour, or the ongoing deification of antisemitic figures such as Malcolm X, or the bakery in Oakland with a huge mural of one of the Palestinian Arab terrorists, etc?
    , @guest
    I don't see how this hierarchy contradicts Taco's point. The women aren't shutting up for the good of multiculturalism, and won't. Women have a hard time shutting up, believe it or not.

    Forget for a moment the fact that the hierarchy is not set in stone. Or the fact that you left out identities of perversion. Or the fact that perceived identities change. (What's a Jew to you could be just another white person to a black.) The major flaw in your thinking is that the various coalition members respect or are even aware of the hierarchy.

    If they are aware, they forget constantly. Which is why they may be called to task for not caring about innocent men period instead of specifying innocent white men. Because their group--womyn--is on their mind, not every other coalition group.

    I don't think it was, but just imagine if a real conflict was on her mind: i.e. blacks sexually assaulting womyn. According to your hierarchy, they have to shut up about it for the good of the cause. Can you think of a reason why they may have an incentive not to go along with that?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. dearieme says:
    @NOTA
    Too bad nobody ever taught her to think in terms of incentives, or she’d have asked herself how men would feel about hiring, promoting, and working with women in a world where baseless sexual harassment claims from any woman could wreck their career. Mike Pence’s rules are a pale shadow of what you would see in such a world.

    Good point. Mr Pence should be awarded a prize for his prudent foresight.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. syonredux says:

    Off-topic,

    Still more Taylor Swift bashing by WOKE Woman of Color:

    However, as we all learned last November when it was revealed that 53% of white women voted for Trump: trust no one. Plus the alt-right has, for inexplicable reasons, taken her on as their aspirational white princess, even though based on our very, very bare-bones knowledge of her politics, she would clearly not give a fuck about them. Yet her silence about them has led to people to assume Taylor cares more about maintaining her fanbase then speaking out.

    I mean, don’t get me wrong, Taylor Swift not actively calling out the alt-right is horrible, and if she isn’t gonna be vocal about hating Nazis (the very least any decent human being can do), she should definitely be called out. But we black people have been telling you guys that she’s shady for years. “The Read” podcast can give you plenty of rants about that topic. Yet none of that criticism has stopped Taylor from making bank.

    https://www.themarysue.com/taylor-swift-think-pieces/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Forbes

    she would clearly not give a fuck about them. Yet her silence about them has led to people to assume Taylor cares more about maintaining her fanbase then speaking out.
     
    Powerful reasoning. What do you figure? An IQ of 90? Lower?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @NOTA
    Too bad nobody ever taught her to think in terms of incentives, or she’d have asked herself how men would feel about hiring, promoting, and working with women in a world where baseless sexual harassment claims from any woman could wreck their career. Mike Pence’s rules are a pale shadow of what you would see in such a world.

    That might be the subconscious end game. To drive men out of the workforce and the economy, and remake everything in a way that suits female psychology and biology.

    Men find working with women uncomfortable. And the reverse is true as well.

    When men controlled society, women were barefoot and in the kitchen. Not threatening their careers.

    Now women subconsciously want most men in their pajamas and playing videogames. Not threatening their careers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @Anon
    I know it may be an unpopular opinion here, but if women have been dressing to attract men in one way or another for the last couple hundred years in western civilization, it's because they find the men hard to attract. If it was easy, they wouldn't go through all the bother. If all women took off their makeup and dressed in average clothes, only a small percentage would be considered good-looking by men. Women did not dress in a fashion to sexually attract men back in the day of the arranged marriage. They used to dress more modestly back in the Middle Ages and in previous times. They only started really dressing up once they were expected to find their mates themselves because they felt it wouldn't work otherwise.

    The goal isn't just to attract a man's eyes, it's to get him to make a commitment to marriage. The latter has always been hard for woman. Before the modern era, young people went through a long engagement to find out whether they were compatible or not, and engagements were still broken right and left in those days. In this era, plenty of men refuse to marry or have kids if they can get sex for free without a commitment. The financial investment women make in trying to get a commitment out of a man has always been huge in proportion to her income, when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl's working salary, which is never that high at any sort of starter job. In the days of the arranged marriage, many men would refuse to commit if it wasn't for a financial sum given to him provided by her family, which was called a dowry. Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.

    Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.

    Marriage yes, sex no.

    Women continue to pretty themselves up long after they have captured a mate. That’s because they enjoy it, and because they want their mate to continue shtupping them.

    There is a thing called joie de vivre. When you live in the amazing, developed world the White Man has built, life is not only about surviving and reproducing. You can actually spend some resources on looking good and fucking. Why do you think everyone else wants to come here?

    Read More
    • Replies: @L Woods
    They do it to keep their opinions open.
    , @ThreeCranes
    Finally!

    Someone is adult enough to admit that women enjoy a good roll in the hay just for the fun of it. It's not always about reproduction or the selfish gene or finding a reliable provider.

    Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. An El Presidente (ha ha).
    , @Forbes
    Looking good and fucking? I've known my share. Mostly though, it's spending those resources.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Here’s an unpopular opinion: …

    One problem for feminists with whom this sentiment IS popular is that the population is becoming more red pilled day by day and is catching on to women’s true feelings on this and other subjects. Arrogant admissions like this one are only hastening that process.

    The proof of that is President Trump and soon to be Senator Roy Moore. Ten years ago, they would have probably not withstood the onslaught of smears they have endured. But more and more, the population is looking askance at such claims and it is going to take more than an accusation from a fabricated incident 20 + years ago to derail a career or lose a lawsuit.

    Assuming Moore is elected, the silver lining will be that women will now have to co-exist with the men they smeared and tried to banish. Same for Trump. Women lie all the time and pretty soon, even the White Knights will get it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moses
    I dunno. Some white knights will *never* get it.

    But yes, women lie all the time. Men too. I've found that women are naturally better at it though.

    Read the Bible. The ancients understood women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. bomag says:
    @Arclight
    Modern feminism - all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise...and even then, it's probably only a matter of time.

    I knew a school administrator in a large district who was handling a discrimination claim from the usual, largish, WOC. She was ranting on about all the discrimination in her life when he asks her, “have I done anything to suggest I’m racist?” and she replied, “not yet”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @DFH
    Why so keen to have your daughter/sister/wife be harassed by a fat Jew or black congressman?

    Why so keen to have your daughter/sister/wife be harassed by a fat Jew or black congressman?

    I’m not.

    In another comment, I mentioned joie de vivre, a concept that seems to be foreign to many people now. Before the types you mention were coddled in my country, it was possible to just enjoy the dance between women and men without turning it all into another terrorized universe of paranoia.

    Maybe this is just another version of The War on Terror. The old America is gone, replaced by fear.

    Read More
    • Agree: Bernardista
    • Replies: @El Dato
    So what about Europe then.

    I hope euthanasia laws are relaxed soon so that responsible but depressive Bürger or citoyens can go to the corner pharmacy, get their pills and sign off honorably.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. L Woods says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.
     
    Marriage yes, sex no.

    Women continue to pretty themselves up long after they have captured a mate. That's because they enjoy it, and because they want their mate to continue shtupping them.

    There is a thing called joie de vivre. When you live in the amazing, developed world the White Man has built, life is not only about surviving and reproducing. You can actually spend some resources on looking good and fucking. Why do you think everyone else wants to come here?

    They do it to keep their opinions open.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Another problem the culture is now running into is that there is no way to walk back from a false accusation of rape, harassment, or male-on-female abuse. In the family court system where this has been going on for decades, it is contained there and does not follow somebody around they way it does in the greater public. Words there without corroborating evidence are taken for what they are worth, just words which go for nothing everywhere.

    Now that this phenomenon has gone mainstream, the only way someone can save their careers and fortunes is to fight to the death. This means going after the accusers until either they are destroyed a la Bill O’Reilly or the charges are proven to be true which means the end of the accused like in Weinstein’s case. Either way, these things are not just going away or being swept under the rug like the family courts.

    What you are seeing now with Congress and the corporate angle is that most of these accusations (both true and false) is are treated as nuisance lawsuits. The people bringing charges make it easier to settle than fight and then agree to a non-disclosure. But once this comes out in the open in front of the whole country there can be no backing down. One side will win and the other lose. My hope is that this red-pilling will make the cost of making up such charges more and more prohibitive helping both the real victims while hurting the scum who are taking advantage of the public’s good will.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. @Anon
    I know it may be an unpopular opinion here, but if women have been dressing to attract men in one way or another for the last couple hundred years in western civilization, it's because they find the men hard to attract. If it was easy, they wouldn't go through all the bother. If all women took off their makeup and dressed in average clothes, only a small percentage would be considered good-looking by men. Women did not dress in a fashion to sexually attract men back in the day of the arranged marriage. They used to dress more modestly back in the Middle Ages and in previous times. They only started really dressing up once they were expected to find their mates themselves because they felt it wouldn't work otherwise.

    The goal isn't just to attract a man's eyes, it's to get him to make a commitment to marriage. The latter has always been hard for woman. Before the modern era, young people went through a long engagement to find out whether they were compatible or not, and engagements were still broken right and left in those days. In this era, plenty of men refuse to marry or have kids if they can get sex for free without a commitment. The financial investment women make in trying to get a commitment out of a man has always been huge in proportion to her income, when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl's working salary, which is never that high at any sort of starter job. In the days of the arranged marriage, many men would refuse to commit if it wasn't for a financial sum given to him provided by her family, which was called a dowry. Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary

    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there’s nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, “Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!”

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    Read More
    • Replies: @BenKenobi
    I actually prefer my woman to have a nice mani/pedi, FWIW.
    , @Anon
    Jewelry--at least the real stuff, gold, silver and actual gems--works exactly the same way a dowry does. It's supposed to be a signal that she has money and isn't broke, because many men think a broke wife does not make a good potential marriage partner. Good jewelry is still convertible to ready cash in an emergency.
    , @Anon
    Good points. Also I never heard of Victorian or Georgian women finding men particularly difficult to attract.
    , @Joe Joe
    I love a well manicured set of long nails on a woman. I wish more women took care of their hands. No more "man hands"!
    , @Harry Baldwin
    Did you ever hear women sitting around admiring and discussing each other's shoes? There's something that no man cares about.
    , @kihowi
    That kind of stuff exists to make it more expensive for other women to compete and drive down their self esteem when they can't.

    Worrying and working takes time and energy that those bitches won't be able to expend on stealing my man.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    I like nail polish on women and do notice that, for what it is worth.
    , @Clyde

    Then there’s nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, “Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!”
     
    I can be greatly impressed. This is highly situation dependent but very nicely done nails and toenails.....are like 20 arrows pointing to that central V location. They are very sexy. To repeat, very situation dependent. When I compliment women directly on finger nails I always get a smile. Long hair is impressive and signalling. It takes so much time and investment.
    , @Forbes

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.
     
    Truth. Out on the town, the beauty pageant is among the women, not for the benefit of men. They want other women to be green with envy. If that serves up male attention, that's frosting on the cake.
    , @Neil Templeton
    "But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it."

    Feature, not a bug. She ain't fishin' for the finely discriminatin'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @Buzz Mohawk

    Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.
     
    Marriage yes, sex no.

    Women continue to pretty themselves up long after they have captured a mate. That's because they enjoy it, and because they want their mate to continue shtupping them.

    There is a thing called joie de vivre. When you live in the amazing, developed world the White Man has built, life is not only about surviving and reproducing. You can actually spend some resources on looking good and fucking. Why do you think everyone else wants to come here?

    Finally!

    Someone is adult enough to admit that women enjoy a good roll in the hay just for the fun of it. It’s not always about reproduction or the selfish gene or finding a reliable provider.

    Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. An El Presidente (ha ha).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. @Buzz Mohawk
    Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm actually not at all concerned about fecund females who can't come to terms with the fact that they share a jungle with males whom nature compels to mount them.

    Deal with it ladies. We males have to carry our seeds around in a sack, so the least you could do is make your choice: stand by civilized men, who have self-control, or continue to signal your virtues to those who would truly rape you.

    Bikinis or burkas. It's up to you.

    Buzz, too funny, more than a LOL.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Muslims don’t want to live under Muslims in their own lands.

    Africans don’t want to live under Africans in their own lands.

    They come to the West because they see White Man as the superior master. They overthrew the white master in their own lands and sent him packing back to UK after WWII… but they follow the master to his own nation to live under him.

    But it would be so humiliating to admit this. So, if there is problem among Diversity, blame it all on whites, and leave it up to whites to solve the problem since whites seem to be more fair and just in dealing with such matters. But then, this implies that whites, as superior masters, must have power over non-whites, and that hurts non-white pride.

    It’s like Lawrence is the only one who can solve the dispute among the Arab tribes since he, as agent of world empire, is above tribal pettiness.

    It’s the Diversity Paradox. Non-whites want to live under white power and white justice, but then, they resent the fact of this preference and dependence(of whites over their own kind),and so, they blame everything on whites and call for end to ‘white privilege’. (But if whites lose power and UK is run by Muslims and Africans, would non-whites really want that kind of justice?)

    But then, whites are the only ones who will listen. Africans don’t listen to Africans, Muslims don’t listen to Muslims, Africans don’t listen to Muslims, and Muslims don’t listen to Africans. I mean what is happening in Libya? Guess what you can buy with $400?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. @jim jones
    Men can only take so much provocation:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xf3ELqb6kc

    Jim, best video ever, thank you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. BenKenobi says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    I actually prefer my woman to have a nice mani/pedi, FWIW.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @Tiny Duck
    Not really all that of a controversial opinion. Most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their positions as is their custom

    Men of Color respect women so it is implied Ms Lindin didn't mean ALL MEN just white men rapists

    You guys are monsters

    Ms. Lindin had to lock her twitter account after the abuse she received from right wing trolls

    Twitter needs to protect women from virtual abuse and hatred

    TD, …..”most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their power.” Recent history, Barack Obama and Eric Holder and any one of dozens of African dictators proves you wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Thea says:

    I wonder if I’m the only one thinks legalized prostitution is a good solution for young men. These women are toxic and any personal engagements with them will cost way more than a night with a hooker.

    I can’t say this to my son because it would horrify him.

    I do tell him to avoid these women like the plague and marry a nice 18 waitress after he established himself. I told him he can’t even expect to have decent conversations with his female college classmates as some are nutty and believe this garbage and my accuse him of harassment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  68. @rogue-one
    Nope.

    The hierarchy is
    0. Jews
    1. Blacks
    2. Hispanic women
    3. Hispanic men
    4. Pakis
    5. White women
    6. East Asians
    7. White men

    Nobody is allowed to criticize or hurt people above them in hierarchy. If a bunch of asian men in UK do rape white women, then the women must shut up for the good of multiculturalism.

    However, if a white man does anything, you are allowed to raise hell.

    The coalition of fringes seems like a neo-caste system in practice.

    Rogue, nice try, but add, Gays, Trans, Bi and Questioning in any order above White men.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Thea says:
    @Anon
    I know it may be an unpopular opinion here, but if women have been dressing to attract men in one way or another for the last couple hundred years in western civilization, it's because they find the men hard to attract. If it was easy, they wouldn't go through all the bother. If all women took off their makeup and dressed in average clothes, only a small percentage would be considered good-looking by men. Women did not dress in a fashion to sexually attract men back in the day of the arranged marriage. They used to dress more modestly back in the Middle Ages and in previous times. They only started really dressing up once they were expected to find their mates themselves because they felt it wouldn't work otherwise.

    The goal isn't just to attract a man's eyes, it's to get him to make a commitment to marriage. The latter has always been hard for woman. Before the modern era, young people went through a long engagement to find out whether they were compatible or not, and engagements were still broken right and left in those days. In this era, plenty of men refuse to marry or have kids if they can get sex for free without a commitment. The financial investment women make in trying to get a commitment out of a man has always been huge in proportion to her income, when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl's working salary, which is never that high at any sort of starter job. In the days of the arranged marriage, many men would refuse to commit if it wasn't for a financial sum given to him provided by her family, which was called a dowry. Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.

    Historically, in England only nobles had arranged marriages. The peasants were free to choose as little money was involved. average men married average women.

    Make up has been used to manipulate men for millennia.

    This problem began in the 20th century due to increased wealth and new ideologies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    Jewelry–at least the real stuff, gold, silver and actual gems–works exactly the same way a dowry does. It’s supposed to be a signal that she has money and isn’t broke, because many men think a broke wife does not make a good potential marriage partner. Good jewelry is still convertible to ready cash in an emergency.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    The dowry can get saved in a bank, a nice music box, or a safe-deposit box at the bank (until they need a bail-in), so long as it's currency, bonds, precious metals, etc... Jewelry, on the other hand, when worn around town is done just to show off. It is like a signal "rob me, rob me" to a petty thief just as if a woman had 50-dollar bills taped to her clothing. The joke would be on the thief in the end, though, because jewelry is also a rip-off, even if the gold is 18-carat.

    Diamonds especially are a scam, no matter what your girl says (in fact, having her think you're insane for NOT wanting to buy a diamond ring is just the fruits of a splendid effort by De Beers, and Co. - more here and here.)

    Yes, it's convertible to cash, but at a 50-75% loss or so.

    I got a signal that I'm not broke. I'm not sleeping on a park bench. If you need to know more, just ask.


    Just edited this a tad. Yes, precious metals in the right form are a great way of keeping REAL money.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @Art Deco
    She made her tweets private.

    In my opinion, a girl’s tweets should ALWAYS be kept private.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    There's a strong argument to be made for there being separate male and female Twitters and perhaps even separate Internets.
    , @Forbes
    I was thinking "kept silent."
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    Maybe nobody else got that one?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    Good points. Also I never heard of Victorian or Georgian women finding men particularly difficult to attract.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Perhaps, unlike American women today, those women didn't weigh more than the men they were trying to attract.
    , @Romanian
    A third of them died as spinsters during Victorian times. They became either too old, or their beaus died in some war, or many other reasons. Selection happens not just through having more children, but also by not having any at all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Clyde says:
    @fish

    Ohs Tinys.....memeber we'll had dat talk.....bout you thinkin U was'n a wimmin .....o at least doing wimmin things! ya....yous rememberz.


    Lnertz "I beinz a Doktor ob teh brain" Pitz
     

    That new Crocodile in Zimbabwe or Lumumbaville would eat Tinys for breakfast and wipe the fat off his lips with his shirt sleeve.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @Charles Pewitt
    Emily Lindin's carefree insouciance regarding the treatment of innocent men in regards to improper behaviour is an indication that Fourth Wave Feminism has brought evil upon the earth. This distaff bitch Emily Lindin says she don't give a rat's ass if innocent men are fired during this current improper behaviour witch hunt. Feminism has always been most foul, but man-hating broads like Emily Lindin have eliminationist intentions for most men.

    Patriotic men remember that White Women Without College Degrees supported Trump in the 2016 presidential election. White Women With College Degrees went slightly in Hillary Clinton's favor. Men must not be seen as attacking all women when we respond to the anti-man provocations of nasty feminist tarts such as Emily Lindin.

    Emily Lindin and the rest of the anti-man Fourth Wave Feminists in the Democrat Party want to cut men's nuts off with a rusty lawn mower blade. These 4th Wave gals are mean bastards who will not hesitate to butcher every man they can get their paws on. Not every smiling broad in a pussy hat is a harmless creature screeching out some stupid nonsense. Some of these murderous broads have evil plans in store for all men, whether the men are decent or not.

    Weaponized White Women who have joined the anti-man cult have taken over a small faction of the Democrat Party. It is up to brave patriotic men and women who love America to stop these 4th Wave Feminist Thugs.

    Exactly right, my friend. I’m proud to report that my wife and my mother both supported Trump and never even considered Clinton. These women are not the problem, and they share our contempt for women who hate men and everything normal.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    I’m afraid this column and the comments prove the point that conservative men do not care at all about a woman’s safety if it means their sexual access to her is blocked, because that comes first for him no matter what, and that the only person who will care at all if she’s assaulted is her angry father or brother. This is the mindset of a primitive, backward, anarchistic male, not a modern man who rightfully belongs to civilization and who can control himself like an adult.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then? None at all. You’ll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don’t walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    You’ll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don’t walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.
     
    Yes, hypocrites are the best.

    Beyond that, learn to realize that conservatives are not into atomization and fundamentally expect there to be a family structure and a variety of societal contracts. A far more reality-based notion than individuals making accusations of each other while creating entire universes of "what should be" in her head.
    , @anon
    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives.

    Protect women from what? Men NOT actually assaulting them, which is what this woman is talking about?
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives.
     
    You write of that which you know nothing. Even a passing understanding of conservative philosophy would persuade you that you are wrong.

    Tell us, are you ignorant, malicious, or stupid?
    , @Anonymous
    If you are concerned about turning women into conservatives, you are one who has not swallowed the red pill yet.

    A woman's political opinions are completely irrelevant. The political opinions she will have are those of the man that owns her. All else is liberal folly.

    The moon does not shine on its own, but it does reflect the light of the sun. The moon has no choice in this matter, it merely reflects exactly as it is shown upon.

    If women are not reflecting your own opinion back to you, you need to work on your own masculinity, your yang essence, your frame.

    You, white man, are the most powerful force in the known universe. Time to start acting like it.

    The result, I assure you, is completely exhilarating.
    , @anon
    What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then?

    Hard as it may be to believe, some women have husbands and/or sons, and I assume they would prefer it if these men had some assurance that they wouldn't have their careers ended without some type of due process, just because some woman decided to get back at them over some perceived slight.

    Now, if you're asking how we plan on appealing to single, vindictive harpies, who want the power to ruin a man's life with nothing more than an accusation, then I admit that that's a trickier problem.

    , @Forbes

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then?
     
    Considering that 99% of the accusations have been alleged against Prog/left/liberal Democrats for rude/humiliating/criminal behavior, it seems, as they say, the proof is in the pudding. What is the incentive for women to align themselves with their abusers?

    Most of the alleged victims appear to be prog-left women, who ate the pudding and din't like it. The cognitive dissonance is revealing, especially the talk-the-talk, walk-the-walk bullshit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @Whiskey
    Translation from female to English: "I HATE HATE HATE beta males, and any false rape accusations because women regret having sex with them is right and just because they are icky beta males. Tom Brady please call me."

    Contra Steve, there is no end of ways in which most women are the enemy of most (Beta Male) White men. All women want is to criminalize beta males even looking at them and exalt Alpha males. And it always happens when women are made men's equal. There is nothing women despise and find innate disgust for than men their equal.

    Women ARE our equals. What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    Agree.
    , @Curle
    "Women ARE our equals."

    Phrases like this obscure more than they enlighten. In very, very few ways are women the equal of men. They are complimentary, worthy of respect, better at some things, but calling them equals simply feeds and reinforces the equalist/blank slate religious view. Should they receive some degree of rights? Yes. Even rights specifically tailored to their unique needs. Aside from that, the whole equality charade needs to be dialed back it is pointless and increasingly brazen in its stupidity.
    , @Kylie
    "Women ARE our equals. What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be."

    And no woman in her right mind would want to be.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @Brabantian
    A relevant heart-rending story, singificantly deep-sixed by mainstream media more than usual

    30-year-old Angelica Wiktor of Vittaryd, Sweden, a lesbian, has apparently killed herself after being raped by two neighbour migrant males - alleged 'Syrians' (often a false nationality claim by migrants in Europe) - and after the Swedish authorities declined to prosecute the men, despite Angelica's personal testimony to police, medical authorities verifying she was raped, & the men continuing to stalk & harass her

    Apparently Angelica shared her story on Facebook before deliberately overdosing on drugs

    The story is all over various 'rightist' websites in multiple languages ... but it seems even semi-mainstream media are not touching it

    It's quite profound how a compelling story like this is hidden by alleged 'news media', making clear we have a bifurcated news 'reality' about key occurrences that expose the horror of Western governmental systems at their worst

    One comment seen about this, is that obviously the 'sh-tlibs' in fact don't really care at all about women, as they claim to do

    The now-suicided lesbian had originally been pleased to have 'refugees' given a home nearby

    I do feel terrible for that poor woman. But why couldn’t she simply move to a different city and apply to immigrate elsewhere, rather than killing herself?

    Alternately, no decent person would have begrudged it if she had killed the rapists instead of herself. After all, why should SHE have to leave her home while the attackers stay where they please.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bomag

    But why couldn’t she simply move...
     
    The sense of failure can be quite profound in European types. Moving doesn't appear as a balm in those moments.

    I suppose a strong sense of personal responsibility helps build an advanced society. It is often shocking to realize most of the world is completely happy to blame someone/something else for what goes on. Cause and effect does not rule. Inshallah. YT.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @NOTA
    Too bad nobody ever taught her to think in terms of incentives, or she’d have asked herself how men would feel about hiring, promoting, and working with women in a world where baseless sexual harassment claims from any woman could wreck their career. Mike Pence’s rules are a pale shadow of what you would see in such a world.

    You’re right.

    Pence’s rules are wise nowadays. I never allow myself to be in a room with any female under age sixty with the door closed at the workplace. Never. Prefer not to be in a room alone with any female at work even with the door open.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @Jack Hanson
    This kind of all out assault on the sons of mothers is going to turn otherwise normie women into valkyries that give the term "helicopter mom" a whole new meaning.

    The casual "tee hee who cares if men are destroyed" reaction has to activate some neural impulse in women with sons that cause them to react like a t rex guarding the nest.

    My Italian Mom, even at her advanced age, would have no problem strangling the life out of any woman who falsely accused me and ruined my life. I mean that literally. I love ya, Mom.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be."

    Thankfully, that is not for you to unilaterally decide. It is a societal decision.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Joe Joe says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    I love a well manicured set of long nails on a woman. I wish more women took care of their hands. No more “man hands”!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @Buzz Mohawk
    Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm actually not at all concerned about fecund females who can't come to terms with the fact that they share a jungle with males whom nature compels to mount them.

    Deal with it ladies. We males have to carry our seeds around in a sack, so the least you could do is make your choice: stand by civilized men, who have self-control, or continue to signal your virtues to those who would truly rape you.

    Bikinis or burkas. It's up to you.

    Comments like these are why I love this blog.

    I agree in principle, but in the summer can’t I at least have a light-colored burka with a few vents?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. biz says:
    @rogue-one
    Nope.

    The hierarchy is
    0. Jews
    1. Blacks
    2. Hispanic women
    3. Hispanic men
    4. Pakis
    5. White women
    6. East Asians
    7. White men

    Nobody is allowed to criticize or hurt people above them in hierarchy. If a bunch of asian men in UK do rape white women, then the women must shut up for the good of multiculturalism.

    However, if a white man does anything, you are allowed to raise hell.

    The coalition of fringes seems like a neo-caste system in practice.

    If Jews are at the top of that progressive stack, how do you explain the current popularity of Linda Sarsour, or the ongoing deification of antisemitic figures such as Malcolm X, or the bakery in Oakland with a huge mural of one of the Palestinian Arab terrorists, etc?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    > If Jews are at the top of that progressive stack, how do you explain ...

    The Holocaust is proof that Adolf Hitler was a cuck.

    (Found on the interwebs.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. A legal question that has me puzzled.

    I understand most of us are in an “at will employment” relationship with our employers.
    What I can’t understand is if a person whom you have no relationship with tries to get you fired on the internet, this isn’t a tort if they succeed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  84. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Clyde
    Her important stuff as she lists it at twitter. Another Teen Vogue writer!

    @EmilyLindin
    writing a novel this month
    founder: #unslut project
    award-winning documentary filmmaker
    author: @wattpad & @zestbooks
    columnist: @teenvogue
    #nanowrimo
    unslutproject.com

    Here is the unslut book she wrote _____ https://www.amazon.com/UnSlut-Diary-Memoir-Emily-Lindin/dp/1942186002

    She got a reputation for being a slut when she was 11 years old, because she let her boyfriend put his hand down her pants. That is kind of slutty, isn’t it?

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/sep/21/unslut-project-against-sexual-bullying

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Let’s rephrase that: I’m not concerned about innocent woman losing their jobs over false harassment/sexual assault claims and I fully expect there to be some accusations about Emily Linden harassing men and women at her work.

    We must believe Emily’s victims and they are out there! Or at least they will be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  86. El Dato says:
    @Jenner Ickham Errican
    https://youtu.be/Q-X0nUDEb_Y?t=15s

    Bunker Ledge Maintenance matters! Serious business.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    I'll start taking it seriously when Morrissey issues a statement a statement on it. That's my rule of thumb for pretty much everything.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Doesn’t this incentivize gang bangs? Maybe that’s really what her unpopular opinion is.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  88. Flip says:
    @Anon
    I know it may be an unpopular opinion here, but if women have been dressing to attract men in one way or another for the last couple hundred years in western civilization, it's because they find the men hard to attract. If it was easy, they wouldn't go through all the bother. If all women took off their makeup and dressed in average clothes, only a small percentage would be considered good-looking by men. Women did not dress in a fashion to sexually attract men back in the day of the arranged marriage. They used to dress more modestly back in the Middle Ages and in previous times. They only started really dressing up once they were expected to find their mates themselves because they felt it wouldn't work otherwise.

    The goal isn't just to attract a man's eyes, it's to get him to make a commitment to marriage. The latter has always been hard for woman. Before the modern era, young people went through a long engagement to find out whether they were compatible or not, and engagements were still broken right and left in those days. In this era, plenty of men refuse to marry or have kids if they can get sex for free without a commitment. The financial investment women make in trying to get a commitment out of a man has always been huge in proportion to her income, when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl's working salary, which is never that high at any sort of starter job. In the days of the arranged marriage, many men would refuse to commit if it wasn't for a financial sum given to him provided by her family, which was called a dowry. Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.

    Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.

    It is harder to achieve if you want the same top of the heap male that everyone else wants, but I think a non-obese, fertile white female can get married pretty readily if she is willing to settle. If she’s fat or too old, then it is different.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. guest says:
    @rogue-one
    Nope.

    The hierarchy is
    0. Jews
    1. Blacks
    2. Hispanic women
    3. Hispanic men
    4. Pakis
    5. White women
    6. East Asians
    7. White men

    Nobody is allowed to criticize or hurt people above them in hierarchy. If a bunch of asian men in UK do rape white women, then the women must shut up for the good of multiculturalism.

    However, if a white man does anything, you are allowed to raise hell.

    The coalition of fringes seems like a neo-caste system in practice.

    I don’t see how this hierarchy contradicts Taco’s point. The women aren’t shutting up for the good of multiculturalism, and won’t. Women have a hard time shutting up, believe it or not.

    Forget for a moment the fact that the hierarchy is not set in stone. Or the fact that you left out identities of perversion. Or the fact that perceived identities change. (What’s a Jew to you could be just another white person to a black.) The major flaw in your thinking is that the various coalition members respect or are even aware of the hierarchy.

    If they are aware, they forget constantly. Which is why they may be called to task for not caring about innocent men period instead of specifying innocent white men. Because their group–womyn–is on their mind, not every other coalition group.

    I don’t think it was, but just imagine if a real conflict was on her mind: i.e. blacks sexually assaulting womyn. According to your hierarchy, they have to shut up about it for the good of the cause. Can you think of a reason why they may have an incentive not to go along with that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @rogue-one
    "The women aren’t shutting up for the good of multiculturalism, and won’t. "

    I agree completely. But opinions of women are (largely) irrelevant. What matters is powers that be (media, administrative state) pay attention to voices of women. In Rotterdam UK, white women did complain about rampant sexual abuse by Asian males. But to avoid rocking the multi-cultural boat, the authorities simply ignored their voices. I feel that if the rapists and pimps were a bunch of balding white men instead of balding Pakistanis, the authorities would have acted and the media class wouldn't have been complicit in silencing the victims.

    "Can you think of a reason why they may have an incentive not to go along with that?"

    Again, I don't think women may have an incentive in shutting up. But in an "intersectional" State, I don't see their voices having much power.

    It's possible (and I hope) I am wrong.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @NOTA
    Too bad nobody ever taught her to think in terms of incentives, or she’d have asked herself how men would feel about hiring, promoting, and working with women in a world where baseless sexual harassment claims from any woman could wreck their career. Mike Pence’s rules are a pale shadow of what you would see in such a world.

    I run a (mostly unsuccessful) software startup, but when I talk with my partner about having to hire, the main thing we’ve come up with is this: we shouldn’t hire women for technical roles. Either (a) she’s an SJW who’s a “woman in tech!” and could sink the company when her incompetence shows or (b) she’s not, but not really any better than a man. Where’s the upside?

    Read More
    • Replies: @stillCARealist
    If you need someone to man the phones, don't hire a man. Hire a woman in her 50's with a stable life.

    Don't hire any weirdos or homos. They're trouble waiting to happen. While I hate saying this, don't hire disabled people either. They're future workers' comp claims.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. [...] can you haters out there name any harm whatsoever that Haven Monahan suffered [...]

    Of course. He sits at home by the window every day waiting for the letter from Hogwarts that will never come. Because of this scandal, his life is ruined and he will NEVER be a Gryffindor!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  92. kihowi says:
    @Arclight
    Modern feminism - all men are to be considered rapists until proven otherwise...and even then, it's probably only a matter of time.

    Correction: We will assume all men are rapists and wife beaters, unless it’s probable that they actually are rapists and wife beaters (muslims, blacks). Then they’re sexy.

    But if it’s probable that they’re not (goody two shoes white guys), we’ll scream it even louder.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    Did you ever hear women sitting around admiring and discussing each other’s shoes? There’s something that no man cares about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Captain Willard
    Sir:

    Salvatore Ferragamo, Bruno Magli, Jimmy Choo, Steve Madden, Christian Louboutin and Yves St. Laurent beg to differ
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Did you ever hear women sitting around admiring and discussing each other’s shoes? There’s something that no man cares about.
     
    A self-defense guru in the '70s showed a talk-show host how stiletto heels could be used as a weapon on a man who gets a little too close for comfort while walking alongside a woman. Just jam one into his instep.

    Since watching that, I have kept a good, healthy distance from any woman in heels.

    Flat-bottom shoes, plain, trimmed nails, and no makeup or hair-dye are just fine with me. Maybe it's the Yankee-German gene mix, or a reaction against postwar pop culture, but I like my women honest.

    Studying in Scandinavia 30+ years ago, I found the local girls so much nicer than the ones back home that I even started to prefer unshaven legs. But then, that's unshaven fair-haired Scandinavian legs. Results may vary with latitude.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. kihowi says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    That kind of stuff exists to make it more expensive for other women to compete and drive down their self esteem when they can’t.

    Worrying and working takes time and energy that those bitches won’t be able to expend on stealing my man.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. El Dato says:

    Off-Topic:

    In Merkel Germany, Holocaust Memorial visits YOU!

    German activists build Holocaust memorial outside AfD politician’s house

    A German activist art collective has erected a replica of the Berlin Holocaust Memorial outside the house of a right-wing politician who’d controversially called on Germany to stop atoning for its past.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Glaivester
    AfD should respond by putting up a copy of a pro-German article by a Jewish writer (Nicholas Stix)

    http://www.vdare.com/articles/nicholas-stix-is-the-final-solution-to-the-german-question-at-hand
    , @Cagey Beast
    He'd better get rid of those concrete slabs before the local Grindr community starts using them for sexual encounters. That's what's happened to the original in Berlin, apparently.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @Tony Lawless
    In my opinion, a girl's tweets should ALWAYS be kept private.

    There’s a strong argument to be made for there being separate male and female Twitters and perhaps even separate Internets.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dahlia
    The biggest mistake in all my years on the internet, and it's been huge, was joining Twitter and using my real name and photo.

    Women of iSteve: Don't ever ID yourself on Twitter. Don't say to yourself, "but I'm too fill-in-the-blank to attract drama/attention." Do not do it.
    If you're here at Steve's, you probably aren't one for drama, otherwise, ignore everything I just said.

    I've been here at Steve's for about 15 years and they've been great years. A low-drama, mostly serene, funny, and even cozy place where I could relax and geek out; the worst fights ever engaged in were the Malthusian vs Cornucopian battles of old. People can get emotional here, but it's so greatly tempered by not seeing each other's faces.

    But I joined Twitter and ID'd myself and within a year and a half, life changed for the worse; it didn't happen overnight. It's not good for me right now, though the worst is over. It led me to being emotionally abused and ultimately assaulted. I'm not joking.

    I miss being the anonymous nerdy girl.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. @guest
    What about innocent men of color?

    Or innocent men who are actually women?

    Obviously, Lindin is a racist tranophobe.

    What about innocent men of color?

    You mean the innocent 2% of college population, but 50% of the rape complaints on-campus? The ‘teens’, the folks we don’t discuss?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. El Dato says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Why so keen to have your daughter/sister/wife be harassed by a fat Jew or black congressman?
     
    I'm not.

    In another comment, I mentioned joie de vivre, a concept that seems to be foreign to many people now. Before the types you mention were coddled in my country, it was possible to just enjoy the dance between women and men without turning it all into another terrorized universe of paranoia.

    Maybe this is just another version of The War on Terror. The old America is gone, replaced by fear.

    So what about Europe then.

    I hope euthanasia laws are relaxed soon so that responsible but depressive Bürger or citoyens can go to the corner pharmacy, get their pills and sign off honorably.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Kylie says:

    The fallout from that Rolling Stone article was very dehumanizing to Haven Monahan. He’s dropped out of sight and is seldom mentioned. It’s as though he never existed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    LOL, or damn close, anyway.
    , @Forbes
    You'd be excused for thinking Haven Monahan was "disappeared."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. @Harry Baldwin
    Did you ever hear women sitting around admiring and discussing each other's shoes? There's something that no man cares about.

    Sir:

    Salvatore Ferragamo, Bruno Magli, Jimmy Choo, Steve Madden, Christian Louboutin and Yves St. Laurent beg to differ

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar



    Did you ever hear women sitting around admiring and discussing each other’s shoes? There’s something that no man cares about.
     
    Sir: Salvatore Ferragamo, Bruno Magli, Jimmy Choo, Steve Madden, Christian Louboutin and Yves St. Laurent beg to differ
     
    He said no MAN.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Brian Williams’ daughter appeared on GIRLS or some whore TV show, and got a ‘rimjob’.

    Williams is proud of his girl.

    Emma Sulkowicz acted like a total fool and then even made a porny video as ‘art project’. Her mother beamed with pride and gave her full support. She is half Jewish and half Chinese.

    A society is defined largely by its main or core themes. The themes of America in the past were noble: liberty, freedom, individuality, independence, morality, family, church, tradition, honor, responsibility, pride earned than demanded, rule of law. The stuff you see in SANDS OF IWO JIMA and IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE.
    The US didn’t live up to these principles at all times and even violated them seriously, but those were the governing principles. And the US moved toward fulfilling them. Also, there was a balance between change and conservation, between individual freedom and common good.

    Now, what are the themes” Diversity? That is neither good nor bad. It’s just a condition. The notion that Diversity is some kind of automatic good is absurd. “Inclusion’? No nation can survive by just including anyone, especially hostile masses of morons.
    ‘Gay pride’? First, what is so proud about homo behavior or tranny nonsense? Slut Pride? Really? Some fat hag who took gender classes in college wearing no bras is something to be proud of? There aren’t any noble themes anymore.
    The main spiritual theme is Homo Worship and Magic Negro.
    The main icons are Negro thug, homo narcissist, nasty bitch with ;pussy hat’, and Diversity leeches who left their own nation to live off whitey. They are pests.
    Or WE LOVE ISRAEL. What does Israel have to do with gentiles who make up 98% of Americans? And why should US support Zionist occupation of West Bank?
    And main aesthetics is tattoos and piercings. So ugly and hideous and trashy.

    Thematically, US has become a nuthouse.
    To be sure, there are still people with Silent Morality. They are ignored and mocked by the Media and Entertainment industry. Also, even progs with terrible stated ideologies contribute most to society when they act like normal decent human beings with conservative values. I mean Ivy League colleges are filled with progs, but my guess is that most of those kids had parents who cared to make them study and act responsible in school.

    If it weren’t for Silent Morality that still lend balance to the US, this nation would sink.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  102. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    https://youtu.be/Q-X0nUDEb_Y?t=15s

    Oh, man! Now you’ve instigated another upcoming post about golf course design, and the fact that certain people are still complaining because they were kept out of the sand traps where the WASPS would socialize and smoke pot until the end of segregation … or something like that … ;-}

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Glaivester says: • Website
    @El Dato
    Off-Topic:

    In Merkel Germany, Holocaust Memorial visits YOU!

    German activists build Holocaust memorial outside AfD politician’s house

    A German activist art collective has erected a replica of the Berlin Holocaust Memorial outside the house of a right-wing politician who’d controversially called on Germany to stop atoning for its past.

     

    AfD should respond by putting up a copy of a pro-German article by a Jewish writer (Nicholas Stix)

    http://www.vdare.com/articles/nicholas-stix-is-the-final-solution-to-the-german-question-at-hand

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @Tiny Duck
    Not really all that of a controversial opinion. Most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their positions as is their custom

    Men of Color respect women so it is implied Ms Lindin didn't mean ALL MEN just white men rapists

    You guys are monsters

    Ms. Lindin had to lock her twitter account after the abuse she received from right wing trolls

    Twitter needs to protect women from virtual abuse and hatred

    Not really all that of a controversial opinion. Most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their positions as is their custom

    Men of Color respect women

    You’re not even trying to sound believable now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @El Dato
    Bunker Ledge Maintenance matters! Serious business.

    I’ll start taking it seriously when Morrissey issues a statement a statement on it. That’s my rule of thumb for pretty much everything.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Coemgen says:

    Haven Monaghan: the new Joe Sixpack!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  107. @El Dato
    Off-Topic:

    In Merkel Germany, Holocaust Memorial visits YOU!

    German activists build Holocaust memorial outside AfD politician’s house

    A German activist art collective has erected a replica of the Berlin Holocaust Memorial outside the house of a right-wing politician who’d controversially called on Germany to stop atoning for its past.

     

    He’d better get rid of those concrete slabs before the local Grindr community starts using them for sexual encounters. That’s what’s happened to the original in Berlin, apparently.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The True and Original David
    People also pee among the tall slabs. And picnic on the short ones. The place looks strikingly trivial, a nothing.

    And it seems to be crumbling. Embarrassment.

    The way you build a Holocaust memorial is to construct an over-the-top haunted house so solid that will last 200+ years.

    And by "haunted house," I mean the kind of attraction that is temporarily opened in shopping malls every October 31. It should have actors shrieking behind glass, blood painted on walls, torture instruments on display, a gesticulating animatronic Führer in a red light, recorded screams coming from ubiquitous speakers, an "electric floor" room that gives visitors a brief electric shock, moveable displays to accommodate tie-ins to the latest Holocaust movie or TV special, etc. Only kitsch makes an impression on the moron masses.

    But does anyone listen to me about this? Oh boy, no. I get the wide-eyed stare and the slow backing-away every time.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. @Kylie
    The fallout from that Rolling Stone article was very dehumanizing to Haven Monahan. He's dropped out of sight and is seldom mentioned. It's as though he never existed.

    LOL, or damn close, anyway.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “If Manson had been a journalist” is more like it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  110. @Anon
    Good points. Also I never heard of Victorian or Georgian women finding men particularly difficult to attract.

    Perhaps, unlike American women today, those women didn’t weigh more than the men they were trying to attract.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Escher
    And were not man-hating harridans hunting for micro-aggressions in every statement and action of their suitors.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Corvinus says:
    @RadicalCenter
    My Italian Mom, even at her advanced age, would have no problem strangling the life out of any woman who falsely accused me and ruined my life. I mean that literally. I love ya, Mom.

    “What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.”

    Thankfully, that is not for you to unilaterally decide. It is a societal decision.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    It is a societal decision.
     
    No, it isn't. You cannot waive your constructionist, positivist, magic wand and change the chromosomes from X to Y. You are delusional.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. Corvinus says:
    @Whiskey
    Translation from female to English: "I HATE HATE HATE beta males, and any false rape accusations because women regret having sex with them is right and just because they are icky beta males. Tom Brady please call me."

    Contra Steve, there is no end of ways in which most women are the enemy of most (Beta Male) White men. All women want is to criminalize beta males even looking at them and exalt Alpha males. And it always happens when women are made men's equal. There is nothing women despise and find innate disgust for than men their equal.

    “Contra Steve, there is no end of ways in which most women are the enemy of most (Beta Male) White men.”

    Some woman really did a number on you, and a result you have to craft a narrative that is so ludicrous on its face that it offers you comfort.

    “All women want is to criminalize beta males even looking at them and exalt Alpha males. And it always happens when women are made men’s equal. There is nothing women despise and find innate disgust for than men their equal.”

    You would rather project your own insecurities rather than deal with the reality that some women, just like some men, have major relationship issues.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Jason Liu says:

    tbh I’m not too concerned with feminists being harassed either

    You could almost call it social justice

    Read More
    • LOL: Daniel Chieh
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  114. bomag says:
    @RadicalCenter
    I do feel terrible for that poor woman. But why couldn't she simply move to a different city and apply to immigrate elsewhere, rather than killing herself?

    Alternately, no decent person would have begrudged it if she had killed the rapists instead of herself. After all, why should SHE have to leave her home while the attackers stay where they please.

    But why couldn’t she simply move…

    The sense of failure can be quite profound in European types. Moving doesn’t appear as a balm in those moments.

    I suppose a strong sense of personal responsibility helps build an advanced society. It is often shocking to realize most of the world is completely happy to blame someone/something else for what goes on. Cause and effect does not rule. Inshallah. YT.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. @Anon
    I'm afraid this column and the comments prove the point that conservative men do not care at all about a woman's safety if it means their sexual access to her is blocked, because that comes first for him no matter what, and that the only person who will care at all if she's assaulted is her angry father or brother. This is the mindset of a primitive, backward, anarchistic male, not a modern man who rightfully belongs to civilization and who can control himself like an adult.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then? None at all. You'll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don't walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.

    You’ll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don’t walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.

    Yes, hypocrites are the best.

    Beyond that, learn to realize that conservatives are not into atomization and fundamentally expect there to be a family structure and a variety of societal contracts. A far more reality-based notion than individuals making accusations of each other while creating entire universes of “what should be” in her head.

    Read More
    • Agree: bomag
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson II
    Agree.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. bomag says:
    @Brabantian
    A relevant heart-rending story, singificantly deep-sixed by mainstream media more than usual

    30-year-old Angelica Wiktor of Vittaryd, Sweden, a lesbian, has apparently killed herself after being raped by two neighbour migrant males - alleged 'Syrians' (often a false nationality claim by migrants in Europe) - and after the Swedish authorities declined to prosecute the men, despite Angelica's personal testimony to police, medical authorities verifying she was raped, & the men continuing to stalk & harass her

    Apparently Angelica shared her story on Facebook before deliberately overdosing on drugs

    The story is all over various 'rightist' websites in multiple languages ... but it seems even semi-mainstream media are not touching it

    It's quite profound how a compelling story like this is hidden by alleged 'news media', making clear we have a bifurcated news 'reality' about key occurrences that expose the horror of Western governmental systems at their worst

    One comment seen about this, is that obviously the 'sh-tlibs' in fact don't really care at all about women, as they claim to do

    The now-suicided lesbian had originally been pleased to have 'refugees' given a home nearby

    Reminds us again of the adage that you do not want a society wholly dependent upon the police for civil order.

    I can’t say America trends any better. We’ve got a Somali walking around Minneapolis after gunning down a blonde. Diplomatic immunity, I guess; or divine right of kings.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    We’ve got a Somali walking around Minneapolis after gunning down a blonde. Diplomatic immunity, I guess; or divine right of kings
     
    Stupidity is the explanation. But it is a good stick. Beat the SJWs with it as often as possible.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    One aspect that people here seem to be missing is the possibility that leftist men are just more psychologically dysfunctional people in general, and more inclined to molest others.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Forbes
    I thought that was a fundamental assumption.
    , @Bel Riose
    You mean leftist men like Corvinus!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    I like nail polish on women and do notice that, for what it is worth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    I like nail polish on women and do notice that, for what it is worth.
     
    Yes, but your name suggests that your recent ancestors may have engaged in foot-binding as well.

    Not that there's anything wrong with that...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. @L Woods
    Is it plain enough yet that the subjugation of women is as integral to civilization as the planting of grains and the division of labor?

    Is it plain enough yet that the subjugation of women is as integral to civilization as the planting of grains and the division of labor?

    No it isn’t. For centuries Christianity treated women well. It is the post-Christian feminist heresy that endorses the supremacist ideology they demand.

    Subjugation of women is rule in the rest of humanity. Your animosity is directed at the wrong target.

    Read More
    • Replies: @L Woods
    1. “Treated well” is a long way from equality.

    2. Just because the West possesses a certain quality doesn’t make that quality good, even if we take it as axiomatic that the West is the best. E.g., developed societies have more obesity. Development is good. Obesity is not good.

    3. To hell with Christianity. It’s set the stage for a great many of our present problems.

    4. Animosity has nothing to do with it. I don’t have animus towards children, but I’m quite convinced that they shouldn’t hold the reins of power.

    5. It’s more or less incontrovertible that transition to agrarian society is highly correlated with the establishment of patriarchy. Some leftists have even latched onto this so as to construct a narrative of a preagrarian paradise lost.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. @L Woods
    Is it plain enough yet that the subjugation of women is as integral to civilization as the planting of grains and the division of labor?

    The ballad is not yet resolved, but I pose that if either sex may behave with impunity, civil life suffers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. @Opinionator
    Steve is on a tear this week.

    Steve is on a tear this week.

    It has been much longer than a week.

    Read More
    • Agree: el topo
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anon
    I'm afraid this column and the comments prove the point that conservative men do not care at all about a woman's safety if it means their sexual access to her is blocked, because that comes first for him no matter what, and that the only person who will care at all if she's assaulted is her angry father or brother. This is the mindset of a primitive, backward, anarchistic male, not a modern man who rightfully belongs to civilization and who can control himself like an adult.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then? None at all. You'll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don't walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives.

    Protect women from what? Men NOT actually assaulting them, which is what this woman is talking about?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Cuckservatism in a nutshell.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. @Anon
    I'm afraid this column and the comments prove the point that conservative men do not care at all about a woman's safety if it means their sexual access to her is blocked, because that comes first for him no matter what, and that the only person who will care at all if she's assaulted is her angry father or brother. This is the mindset of a primitive, backward, anarchistic male, not a modern man who rightfully belongs to civilization and who can control himself like an adult.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then? None at all. You'll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don't walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives.

    You write of that which you know nothing. Even a passing understanding of conservative philosophy would persuade you that you are wrong.

    Tell us, are you ignorant, malicious, or stupid?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. Clyde says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    Then there’s nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, “Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!”

    I can be greatly impressed. This is highly situation dependent but very nicely done nails and toenails…..are like 20 arrows pointing to that central V location. They are very sexy. To repeat, very situation dependent. When I compliment women directly on finger nails I always get a smile. Long hair is impressive and signalling. It takes so much time and investment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. Forbes says:
    @Clyde
    Her important stuff as she lists it at twitter. Another Teen Vogue writer!

    @EmilyLindin
    writing a novel this month
    founder: #unslut project
    award-winning documentary filmmaker
    author: @wattpad & @zestbooks
    columnist: @teenvogue
    #nanowrimo
    unslutproject.com

    Here is the unslut book she wrote _____ https://www.amazon.com/UnSlut-Diary-Memoir-Emily-Lindin/dp/1942186002

    I wanna hear about the award she won for her documentary… Where everyone who enters gets a prize? Was it a re-purposed bowling trophy?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. @Whiskey
    Translation from female to English: "I HATE HATE HATE beta males, and any false rape accusations because women regret having sex with them is right and just because they are icky beta males. Tom Brady please call me."

    Contra Steve, there is no end of ways in which most women are the enemy of most (Beta Male) White men. All women want is to criminalize beta males even looking at them and exalt Alpha males. And it always happens when women are made men's equal. There is nothing women despise and find innate disgust for than men their equal.

    Let your trauma go Whiskey. You are having zero affect upon her. And you have let her define you.

    You are drinking poison, and assuming it will harm your former lover. It will only kill you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Anon
    I'm afraid this column and the comments prove the point that conservative men do not care at all about a woman's safety if it means their sexual access to her is blocked, because that comes first for him no matter what, and that the only person who will care at all if she's assaulted is her angry father or brother. This is the mindset of a primitive, backward, anarchistic male, not a modern man who rightfully belongs to civilization and who can control himself like an adult.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then? None at all. You'll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don't walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.

    If you are concerned about turning women into conservatives, you are one who has not swallowed the red pill yet.

    A woman’s political opinions are completely irrelevant. The political opinions she will have are those of the man that owns her. All else is liberal folly.

    The moon does not shine on its own, but it does reflect the light of the sun. The moon has no choice in this matter, it merely reflects exactly as it is shown upon.

    If women are not reflecting your own opinion back to you, you need to work on your own masculinity, your yang essence, your frame.

    You, white man, are the most powerful force in the known universe. Time to start acting like it.

    The result, I assure you, is completely exhilarating.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "If you are concerned about turning women into conservatives, you are one who has not swallowed the red pill yet."

    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It's pseudo-intellectualism.

    "The political opinions she will have are those of the man that owns her. All else is liberal folly."

    Men do not "own" women. They are not less than a man if he is unable to "rein" her in. I would surmise that you are married and desire to put your foot down more, but are rather weak minded. So, to alleviate your stress, you go on blogs and show how manly you are by crafting a narrative that is other than befitting of your current status. In other words, you are a "gamma" if one is keeping track of the scorecard at home.

    "You, white man, are the most powerful force in the known universe. Time to start acting like it."

    You are no different than a radical feminist. Basically, if ALL white men refuse to think and act in a particular manner ALL of the time, they are other than masculine. Fortunately, we men make go our own way.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. @bomag
    Reminds us again of the adage that you do not want a society wholly dependent upon the police for civil order.

    I can't say America trends any better. We've got a Somali walking around Minneapolis after gunning down a blonde. Diplomatic immunity, I guess; or divine right of kings.

    We’ve got a Somali walking around Minneapolis after gunning down a blonde. Diplomatic immunity, I guess; or divine right of kings

    Stupidity is the explanation. But it is a good stick. Beat the SJWs with it as often as possible.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. @RadicalCenter
    Women ARE our equals. What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.

    Agree.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. @Corvinus
    "What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be."

    Thankfully, that is not for you to unilaterally decide. It is a societal decision.

    It is a societal decision.

    No, it isn’t. You cannot waive your constructionist, positivist, magic wand and change the chromosomes from X to Y. You are delusional.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "No, it isn’t. You cannot waive your constructionist, positivist, magic wand and change the chromosomes from X to Y. You are delusional."

    Do you even understand context? Radical Center stated “What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.” The implication here is that the political rights and social mores that have changed within the last 100 years regarding female opportunities in our society could be reverted back to those glorious "good old days". I made mention of how today's men and women will ultimately decide if they will "turn back the clock" or "move forward".

    Furthermore, Christianity treated women well, but not Christians.

    "It is the post-Christian feminist heresy that endorses the supremacist ideology they demand."

    IF our society was solely predicated on Christian ideals. Except we have in our nation the separation of church and state. Secularist ideas about the nature and roles of men and women in our society may not necessarily be rooted in traditional religious beliefs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. @Daniel Chieh

    You’ll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don’t walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.
     
    Yes, hypocrites are the best.

    Beyond that, learn to realize that conservatives are not into atomization and fundamentally expect there to be a family structure and a variety of societal contracts. A far more reality-based notion than individuals making accusations of each other while creating entire universes of "what should be" in her head.

    Agree.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anon
    I'm afraid this column and the comments prove the point that conservative men do not care at all about a woman's safety if it means their sexual access to her is blocked, because that comes first for him no matter what, and that the only person who will care at all if she's assaulted is her angry father or brother. This is the mindset of a primitive, backward, anarchistic male, not a modern man who rightfully belongs to civilization and who can control himself like an adult.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then? None at all. You'll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don't walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.

    What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then?

    Hard as it may be to believe, some women have husbands and/or sons, and I assume they would prefer it if these men had some assurance that they wouldn’t have their careers ended without some type of due process, just because some woman decided to get back at them over some perceived slight.

    Now, if you’re asking how we plan on appealing to single, vindictive harpies, who want the power to ruin a man’s life with nothing more than an accusation, then I admit that that’s a trickier problem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Forbes says:
    @eah
    Amazing 3-tweet story.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH0V4AExFqC.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH3VoAE0jjm.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH1U8AEzxBh.jpg

    (((white supremacy)))

    These fuck-wits believe “disproportionately accused” can only result from racism, so next up will be an amnesty rather than a “one free grope” rule…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Forbes says:
    @Tiny Duck
    Not really all that of a controversial opinion. Most men in power are white men so of course they abuse their positions as is their custom

    Men of Color respect women so it is implied Ms Lindin didn't mean ALL MEN just white men rapists

    You guys are monsters

    Ms. Lindin had to lock her twitter account after the abuse she received from right wing trolls

    Twitter needs to protect women from virtual abuse and hatred

    All women are helpless, according to Tiny Dick:

    Twitter needs to protect women from virtual abuse and hatred

    Simply ban all women from Twitter and other social media–for their own protection and safety. Virtual abuse and hatred could lead to virtually anything…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Forbes says:
    @Whiskey
    Translation from female to English: "I HATE HATE HATE beta males, and any false rape accusations because women regret having sex with them is right and just because they are icky beta males. Tom Brady please call me."

    Contra Steve, there is no end of ways in which most women are the enemy of most (Beta Male) White men. All women want is to criminalize beta males even looking at them and exalt Alpha males. And it always happens when women are made men's equal. There is nothing women despise and find innate disgust for than men their equal.

    Absolutely.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Eagle Eye says:

    The pendulum has reached peak feminism and is swinging back:

    CNN reporter Dylan Byers is slammed for bemoaning the ‘talent drain’ that raft of sexual harassment claims have caused in the media industry

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5106445/Dylan-Byers-slammed-disgusting-talent-drain-tweet.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Curle
    ‘talent drain’

    Almost like suspending the special Olympics.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Forbes says:
    @syonredux
    Off-topic,


    Still more Taylor Swift bashing by WOKE Woman of Color:

    However, as we all learned last November when it was revealed that 53% of white women voted for Trump: trust no one. Plus the alt-right has, for inexplicable reasons, taken her on as their aspirational white princess, even though based on our very, very bare-bones knowledge of her politics, she would clearly not give a fuck about them. Yet her silence about them has led to people to assume Taylor cares more about maintaining her fanbase then speaking out.

     


    I mean, don’t get me wrong, Taylor Swift not actively calling out the alt-right is horrible, and if she isn’t gonna be vocal about hating Nazis (the very least any decent human being can do), she should definitely be called out. But we black people have been telling you guys that she’s shady for years. “The Read” podcast can give you plenty of rants about that topic. Yet none of that criticism has stopped Taylor from making bank.
     
    https://www.themarysue.com/taylor-swift-think-pieces/

    she would clearly not give a fuck about them. Yet her silence about them has led to people to assume Taylor cares more about maintaining her fanbase then speaking out.

    Powerful reasoning. What do you figure? An IQ of 90? Lower?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. Forbes says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.
     
    Marriage yes, sex no.

    Women continue to pretty themselves up long after they have captured a mate. That's because they enjoy it, and because they want their mate to continue shtupping them.

    There is a thing called joie de vivre. When you live in the amazing, developed world the White Man has built, life is not only about surviving and reproducing. You can actually spend some resources on looking good and fucking. Why do you think everyone else wants to come here?

    Looking good and fucking? I’ve known my share. Mostly though, it’s spending those resources.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Forbes says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    Truth. Out on the town, the beauty pageant is among the women, not for the benefit of men. They want other women to be green with envy. If that serves up male attention, that’s frosting on the cake.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Rich married women compete over things like handbags, which has the beneficial effect that they aren't competing over each other's husbands. No straight man was ever seduced by a more fashionable handbag.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Forbes says:
    @Tony Lawless
    In my opinion, a girl's tweets should ALWAYS be kept private.

    I was thinking “kept silent.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. @Forbes

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.
     
    Truth. Out on the town, the beauty pageant is among the women, not for the benefit of men. They want other women to be green with envy. If that serves up male attention, that's frosting on the cake.

    Rich married women compete over things like handbags, which has the beneficial effect that they aren’t competing over each other’s husbands. No straight man was ever seduced by a more fashionable handbag.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Forbes
    Precisely. Four- and five-figure handbags never got any guy's motor running. Don't even start on shoes...
    , @black sea

    No straight man was ever seduced by a more fashionable handbag.
     
    A cunning little purse, on the other hand . . .
    , @guest
    There are only so many hours in a day, I suppose, but I don't imagine handbag competition takes much away from man-stealing. Women have a bottomless capacity for competition.

    If there's less husband-stealing in the vanity handbag class, it's only because those women are already dried up by the time they get married, and men are being stolen by younger girls.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Forbes says:
    @Anon
    I'm afraid this column and the comments prove the point that conservative men do not care at all about a woman's safety if it means their sexual access to her is blocked, because that comes first for him no matter what, and that the only person who will care at all if she's assaulted is her angry father or brother. This is the mindset of a primitive, backward, anarchistic male, not a modern man who rightfully belongs to civilization and who can control himself like an adult.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then? None at all. You'll just make them liberals, because those who at least talk the talk even if they don't walk the walk in secret, still look like a better pick than conservatives who neither talk the talk or walk the walk.

    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives. What incentive do they have to become conservatives, then?

    Considering that 99% of the accusations have been alleged against Prog/left/liberal Democrats for rude/humiliating/criminal behavior, it seems, as they say, the proof is in the pudding. What is the incentive for women to align themselves with their abusers?

    Most of the alleged victims appear to be prog-left women, who ate the pudding and din’t like it. The cognitive dissonance is revealing, especially the talk-the-talk, walk-the-walk bullshit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. Forbes says:
    @Steve Sailer
    Rich married women compete over things like handbags, which has the beneficial effect that they aren't competing over each other's husbands. No straight man was ever seduced by a more fashionable handbag.

    Precisely. Four- and five-figure handbags never got any guy’s motor running. Don’t even start on shoes…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lurker

    Four- and five-figure handbags never got any guy’s motor running. Don’t even start on shoes…
     
    Handbags never got any guy’s motor running. FTFY.

    Shoes otoh . . .I think sexy shoes can really help a lady. But most normal men certainly won't know or care what designer was responsible, price tag etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. Forbes says:
    @Kylie
    The fallout from that Rolling Stone article was very dehumanizing to Haven Monahan. He's dropped out of sight and is seldom mentioned. It's as though he never existed.

    You’d be excused for thinking Haven Monahan was “disappeared.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. Forbes says:
    @Anon
    One aspect that people here seem to be missing is the possibility that leftist men are just more psychologically dysfunctional people in general, and more inclined to molest others.

    I thought that was a fundamental assumption.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. Dahlia says:
    @Cagey Beast
    There's a strong argument to be made for there being separate male and female Twitters and perhaps even separate Internets.

    The biggest mistake in all my years on the internet, and it’s been huge, was joining Twitter and using my real name and photo.

    Women of iSteve: Don’t ever ID yourself on Twitter. Don’t say to yourself, “but I’m too fill-in-the-blank to attract drama/attention.” Do not do it.
    If you’re here at Steve’s, you probably aren’t one for drama, otherwise, ignore everything I just said.

    I’ve been here at Steve’s for about 15 years and they’ve been great years. A low-drama, mostly serene, funny, and even cozy place where I could relax and geek out; the worst fights ever engaged in were the Malthusian vs Cornucopian battles of old. People can get emotional here, but it’s so greatly tempered by not seeing each other’s faces.

    But I joined Twitter and ID’d myself and within a year and a half, life changed for the worse; it didn’t happen overnight. It’s not good for me right now, though the worst is over. It led me to being emotionally abused and ultimately assaulted. I’m not joking.

    I miss being the anonymous nerdy girl.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dahlia
    Btw, it's still Julian Simon ftw.
    , @Clyde
    I got screwed once (say 1998) back in the heyday of newsgroups by a lib who I thought was honorable. Immediately this turd posted my info. He tried to dox me which was primitive back then but he failed because he only got partial info from me. It was an immigration newsgroup.
    , @ScarletNumber
    My prettiest student is named Dahlia. She is literally head-turning beautiful.
    , @Kylie
    Thanks for the heads-up, Dahlia. I'm sorry you had such an awful experience.

    I have a Facebook page under my real name. I use it to share posts about homeless dogs. I just joined Instagram but haven't posted any pics. I don't tweet or twitter.

    After eight years at iSteve. I have yet to tell anyone, online or in real life, that I post here. Not even Steve knows.

    Life is good. Life is better if you know how to fly under the radar.
    , @Cagey Beast
    I hate to hear what happened to you. The current web is really a terrible mess. The only people who don't think so now are people with nothing to say and who just go with the flow. Even some of those poor people get plucked out of the herd and mercilessly tormented online for a while, before the mob and the media move on.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Dahlia says:
    @Dahlia
    The biggest mistake in all my years on the internet, and it's been huge, was joining Twitter and using my real name and photo.

    Women of iSteve: Don't ever ID yourself on Twitter. Don't say to yourself, "but I'm too fill-in-the-blank to attract drama/attention." Do not do it.
    If you're here at Steve's, you probably aren't one for drama, otherwise, ignore everything I just said.

    I've been here at Steve's for about 15 years and they've been great years. A low-drama, mostly serene, funny, and even cozy place where I could relax and geek out; the worst fights ever engaged in were the Malthusian vs Cornucopian battles of old. People can get emotional here, but it's so greatly tempered by not seeing each other's faces.

    But I joined Twitter and ID'd myself and within a year and a half, life changed for the worse; it didn't happen overnight. It's not good for me right now, though the worst is over. It led me to being emotionally abused and ultimately assaulted. I'm not joking.

    I miss being the anonymous nerdy girl.

    Btw, it’s still Julian Simon ftw.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. @Anon
    Jewelry--at least the real stuff, gold, silver and actual gems--works exactly the same way a dowry does. It's supposed to be a signal that she has money and isn't broke, because many men think a broke wife does not make a good potential marriage partner. Good jewelry is still convertible to ready cash in an emergency.

    The dowry can get saved in a bank, a nice music box, or a safe-deposit box at the bank (until they need a bail-in), so long as it’s currency, bonds, precious metals, etc… Jewelry, on the other hand, when worn around town is done just to show off. It is like a signal “rob me, rob me” to a petty thief just as if a woman had 50-dollar bills taped to her clothing. The joke would be on the thief in the end, though, because jewelry is also a rip-off, even if the gold is 18-carat.

    Diamonds especially are a scam, no matter what your girl says (in fact, having her think you’re insane for NOT wanting to buy a diamond ring is just the fruits of a splendid effort by De Beers, and Co. – more here and here.)

    Yes, it’s convertible to cash, but at a 50-75% loss or so.

    I got a signal that I’m not broke. I’m not sleeping on a park bench. If you need to know more, just ask.

    Just edited this a tad. Yes, precious metals in the right form are a great way of keeping REAL money.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Tony Lawless
    In my opinion, a girl's tweets should ALWAYS be kept private.

    Maybe nobody else got that one?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Ivy says:
    @eah
    Amazing 3-tweet story.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH0V4AExFqC.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH3VoAE0jjm.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH1U8AEzxBh.jpg

    (((white supremacy)))

    Who bitch this is?

    Look in the dictionary and see Emily Lindin’s picture.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. Clyde says:
    @Dahlia
    The biggest mistake in all my years on the internet, and it's been huge, was joining Twitter and using my real name and photo.

    Women of iSteve: Don't ever ID yourself on Twitter. Don't say to yourself, "but I'm too fill-in-the-blank to attract drama/attention." Do not do it.
    If you're here at Steve's, you probably aren't one for drama, otherwise, ignore everything I just said.

    I've been here at Steve's for about 15 years and they've been great years. A low-drama, mostly serene, funny, and even cozy place where I could relax and geek out; the worst fights ever engaged in were the Malthusian vs Cornucopian battles of old. People can get emotional here, but it's so greatly tempered by not seeing each other's faces.

    But I joined Twitter and ID'd myself and within a year and a half, life changed for the worse; it didn't happen overnight. It's not good for me right now, though the worst is over. It led me to being emotionally abused and ultimately assaulted. I'm not joking.

    I miss being the anonymous nerdy girl.

    I got screwed once (say 1998) back in the heyday of newsgroups by a lib who I thought was honorable. Immediately this turd posted my info. He tried to dox me which was primitive back then but he failed because he only got partial info from me. It was an immigration newsgroup.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. L Woods says:
    @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    Is it plain enough yet that the subjugation of women is as integral to civilization as the planting of grains and the division of labor?
     
    No it isn't. For centuries Christianity treated women well. It is the post-Christian feminist heresy that endorses the supremacist ideology they demand.

    Subjugation of women is rule in the rest of humanity. Your animosity is directed at the wrong target.

    1. “Treated well” is a long way from equality.

    2. Just because the West possesses a certain quality doesn’t make that quality good, even if we take it as axiomatic that the West is the best. E.g., developed societies have more obesity. Development is good. Obesity is not good.

    3. To hell with Christianity. It’s set the stage for a great many of our present problems.

    4. Animosity has nothing to do with it. I don’t have animus towards children, but I’m quite convinced that they shouldn’t hold the reins of power.

    5. It’s more or less incontrovertible that transition to agrarian society is highly correlated with the establishment of patriarchy. Some leftists have even latched onto this so as to construct a narrative of a preagrarian paradise lost.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    "'Treated well' is a long way from equality"

    We don't have equality now, and never will. And shouldn't. Everyone would find it intolerable if we tried.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. @Whiskey
    Translation from female to English: "I HATE HATE HATE beta males, and any false rape accusations because women regret having sex with them is right and just because they are icky beta males. Tom Brady please call me."

    Contra Steve, there is no end of ways in which most women are the enemy of most (Beta Male) White men. All women want is to criminalize beta males even looking at them and exalt Alpha males. And it always happens when women are made men's equal. There is nothing women despise and find innate disgust for than men their equal.

    Every now and then, I check in to see if Whiskey has been been laid.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Neil Templeton
    Whiskey is my lodestone. If his comments vary slightly I take note. If his comments ever veer 90° or reverse, I will know the end is nigh.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. @Reg Cæsar

    when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary
     
    Hair and makeup, sure. Clothes? Maybe.

    But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.

    Then there's nail polish. Come on, when have you ever heard a man say, "Gee, that girl has such beautiful nails!"

    Much of what she spends is to impress other women.

    “But jewelry? How does that attract men? It would scare me away, as she might expect me to buy her more of it.”

    Feature, not a bug. She ain’t fishin’ for the finely discriminatin’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. black sea says:
    @Steve Sailer
    Rich married women compete over things like handbags, which has the beneficial effect that they aren't competing over each other's husbands. No straight man was ever seduced by a more fashionable handbag.

    No straight man was ever seduced by a more fashionable handbag.

    A cunning little purse, on the other hand . . .

    Read More
    • LOL: fish
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. guest says:
    @Clyde
    Her important stuff as she lists it at twitter. Another Teen Vogue writer!

    @EmilyLindin
    writing a novel this month
    founder: #unslut project
    award-winning documentary filmmaker
    author: @wattpad & @zestbooks
    columnist: @teenvogue
    #nanowrimo
    unslutproject.com

    Here is the unslut book she wrote _____ https://www.amazon.com/UnSlut-Diary-Memoir-Emily-Lindin/dp/1942186002

    I see several of her Amazon reviews are entirely about her tweet. One of which–can’t tell whether or not it’s a parody–says she’s racist. Merely because the tweet talked about men in general instead of specifying white men.

    Good times.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. guest says:
    @L Woods
    1. “Treated well” is a long way from equality.

    2. Just because the West possesses a certain quality doesn’t make that quality good, even if we take it as axiomatic that the West is the best. E.g., developed societies have more obesity. Development is good. Obesity is not good.

    3. To hell with Christianity. It’s set the stage for a great many of our present problems.

    4. Animosity has nothing to do with it. I don’t have animus towards children, but I’m quite convinced that they shouldn’t hold the reins of power.

    5. It’s more or less incontrovertible that transition to agrarian society is highly correlated with the establishment of patriarchy. Some leftists have even latched onto this so as to construct a narrative of a preagrarian paradise lost.

    “‘Treated well’ is a long way from equality”

    We don’t have equality now, and never will. And shouldn’t. Everyone would find it intolerable if we tried.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. @The True and Original David
    Every now and then, I check in to see if Whiskey has been been laid.

    Whiskey is my lodestone. If his comments vary slightly I take note. If his comments ever veer 90° or reverse, I will know the end is nigh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. guest says:
    @Steve Sailer
    Rich married women compete over things like handbags, which has the beneficial effect that they aren't competing over each other's husbands. No straight man was ever seduced by a more fashionable handbag.

    There are only so many hours in a day, I suppose, but I don’t imagine handbag competition takes much away from man-stealing. Women have a bottomless capacity for competition.

    If there’s less husband-stealing in the vanity handbag class, it’s only because those women are already dried up by the time they get married, and men are being stolen by younger girls.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. @Dahlia
    The biggest mistake in all my years on the internet, and it's been huge, was joining Twitter and using my real name and photo.

    Women of iSteve: Don't ever ID yourself on Twitter. Don't say to yourself, "but I'm too fill-in-the-blank to attract drama/attention." Do not do it.
    If you're here at Steve's, you probably aren't one for drama, otherwise, ignore everything I just said.

    I've been here at Steve's for about 15 years and they've been great years. A low-drama, mostly serene, funny, and even cozy place where I could relax and geek out; the worst fights ever engaged in were the Malthusian vs Cornucopian battles of old. People can get emotional here, but it's so greatly tempered by not seeing each other's faces.

    But I joined Twitter and ID'd myself and within a year and a half, life changed for the worse; it didn't happen overnight. It's not good for me right now, though the worst is over. It led me to being emotionally abused and ultimately assaulted. I'm not joking.

    I miss being the anonymous nerdy girl.

    My prettiest student is named Dahlia. She is literally head-turning beautiful.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. @Cagey Beast
    He'd better get rid of those concrete slabs before the local Grindr community starts using them for sexual encounters. That's what's happened to the original in Berlin, apparently.

    People also pee among the tall slabs. And picnic on the short ones. The place looks strikingly trivial, a nothing.

    And it seems to be crumbling. Embarrassment.

    The way you build a Holocaust memorial is to construct an over-the-top haunted house so solid that will last 200+ years.

    And by “haunted house,” I mean the kind of attraction that is temporarily opened in shopping malls every October 31. It should have actors shrieking behind glass, blood painted on walls, torture instruments on display, a gesticulating animatronic Führer in a red light, recorded screams coming from ubiquitous speakers, an “electric floor” room that gives visitors a brief electric shock, moveable displays to accommodate tie-ins to the latest Holocaust movie or TV special, etc. Only kitsch makes an impression on the moron masses.

    But does anyone listen to me about this? Oh boy, no. I get the wide-eyed stare and the slow backing-away every time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    If they want quality replacements for their knockoff cowboy blocks, we could flog off the ones still littering almost any halfway decent beach on the east coast. Seems they'll outlast Stonehenge.
    Here's some handy Polish chaps we got in, to do the ones on the beach just north of The Royal & Ancient, across the Eden estuary. http://www.pillbox-study-group.org.uk/psgwordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Engineers-of-the-1st-Rifle-Brigade-1st-Polish-Corps-constructing-beach-defences-at-Tentsmuir-in-Scotland.-The-concrete-blocks-were-used-as-anti-tank-obstacles.jpg
    Kids are occasionally crushed by the larger ones, e.g. like those at Alnwick, digging in the sand under them, as no amount of dire warnings about relict UXB mines deters them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. ic1000 says:
    @eah
    Amazing 3-tweet story.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH0V4AExFqC.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH3VoAE0jjm.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH1U8AEzxBh.jpg

    (((white supremacy)))

    Fringe-fraying!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Peterike says:
    @Brabantian
    A relevant heart-rending story, singificantly deep-sixed by mainstream media more than usual

    30-year-old Angelica Wiktor of Vittaryd, Sweden, a lesbian, has apparently killed herself after being raped by two neighbour migrant males - alleged 'Syrians' (often a false nationality claim by migrants in Europe) - and after the Swedish authorities declined to prosecute the men, despite Angelica's personal testimony to police, medical authorities verifying she was raped, & the men continuing to stalk & harass her

    Apparently Angelica shared her story on Facebook before deliberately overdosing on drugs

    The story is all over various 'rightist' websites in multiple languages ... but it seems even semi-mainstream media are not touching it

    It's quite profound how a compelling story like this is hidden by alleged 'news media', making clear we have a bifurcated news 'reality' about key occurrences that expose the horror of Western governmental systems at their worst

    One comment seen about this, is that obviously the 'sh-tlibs' in fact don't really care at all about women, as they claim to do

    The now-suicided lesbian had originally been pleased to have 'refugees' given a home nearby

    “The now-suicided lesbian had originally been pleased to have ‘refugees’ given a home nearby.”

    Another Poetic Justice Warrior. Sad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. res says:
    @AndrewR
    I'm never disgusted by disgusting tweets or comments per se. It's seeing hundreds or thousands of "likes" that is disgusting.

    Here is this evil person trying to play victim now:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/EmilyLindin/status/933132157786009600

    Her tweets are protected now (only her followers can see them). I wonder if iSteve’s post had anything to do with that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Steady, Steve. Don’t take the bait. No reason to get emotional. Best to stay calm, cool, collected. Much more prudent to take the tactic of slightly annoyance a la “You know, I’m inclined to believe that there’s a logical explanation for why nearly all of these cases that are incessantly championed by the Left, the MSM, and feminists ultimately turn out to be the hoaxing bullshit that they are. And that’s because these cases are nothing more than actual bullshit. Whether they’re due to upper class women ticked off at not getting their own way on the Narrative is more or less moot at this point. But they are in fact BS.”

    Steady as it goes. Ultimately lord willing, truth eventually prevails.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  166. Kylie says:
    @Dahlia
    The biggest mistake in all my years on the internet, and it's been huge, was joining Twitter and using my real name and photo.

    Women of iSteve: Don't ever ID yourself on Twitter. Don't say to yourself, "but I'm too fill-in-the-blank to attract drama/attention." Do not do it.
    If you're here at Steve's, you probably aren't one for drama, otherwise, ignore everything I just said.

    I've been here at Steve's for about 15 years and they've been great years. A low-drama, mostly serene, funny, and even cozy place where I could relax and geek out; the worst fights ever engaged in were the Malthusian vs Cornucopian battles of old. People can get emotional here, but it's so greatly tempered by not seeing each other's faces.

    But I joined Twitter and ID'd myself and within a year and a half, life changed for the worse; it didn't happen overnight. It's not good for me right now, though the worst is over. It led me to being emotionally abused and ultimately assaulted. I'm not joking.

    I miss being the anonymous nerdy girl.

    Thanks for the heads-up, Dahlia. I’m sorry you had such an awful experience.

    I have a Facebook page under my real name. I use it to share posts about homeless dogs. I just joined Instagram but haven’t posted any pics. I don’t tweet or twitter.

    After eight years at iSteve. I have yet to tell anyone, online or in real life, that I post here. Not even Steve knows.

    Life is good. Life is better if you know how to fly under the radar.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. Curle says:
    @RadicalCenter
    Women ARE our equals. What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.

    “Women ARE our equals.”

    Phrases like this obscure more than they enlighten. In very, very few ways are women the equal of men. They are complimentary, worthy of respect, better at some things, but calling them equals simply feeds and reinforces the equalist/blank slate religious view. Should they receive some degree of rights? Yes. Even rights specifically tailored to their unique needs. Aside from that, the whole equality charade needs to be dialed back it is pointless and increasingly brazen in its stupidity.

    Read More
    • Agree: Jasper Been
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    They are complimentary
     
    Complementary.

    I haven't heard many complements from them lately. And I mean toward my entire sex, not just me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Kylie says:
    @RadicalCenter
    Women ARE our equals. What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.

    “Women ARE our equals. What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.”

    And no woman in her right mind would want to be.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Benny
    Of course not; they're too busy perving on their own rears. Intellectual stuff.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. @L Woods
    Is it plain enough yet that the subjugation of women is as integral to civilization as the planting of grains and the division of labor?

    Actually it’s even far worse than that. These anti-feminist conspiracies go back long before civilization, and even across species. See the strict enforcement of traditional gender roles among apes and in lion and wolf packs, just for example. Feminism can only triumph in the end by obliterating all life down to the amoeba level and starting over from there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. Curle says:
    @Eagle Eye
    The pendulum has reached peak feminism and is swinging back:

    CNN reporter Dylan Byers is slammed for bemoaning the 'talent drain' that raft of sexual harassment claims have caused in the media industry
     
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5106445/Dylan-Byers-slammed-disgusting-talent-drain-tweet.html

    ‘talent drain’

    Almost like suspending the special Olympics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. @Altai
    I think she needed it, her Twitter bio sounds like every other dull, conformist but slightly smarter than average woman on Twitter. (I'm quirky in exactly the same way as all my class peers have agreed is currently most popular to be!) Has anyone made a generator for bios like this?

    Twanger of stringed things on the West End production of @OurLadiesLDN || Life metaphors, puns & positivity.
     

    She does get points for not warning people just how snarky she can be.

    Read More
    • Replies: @el topo
    I've seen many dating profiles in which the woman specifies that her prospective mate "must speak sarcasm".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. rogue-one says:
    @guest
    I don't see how this hierarchy contradicts Taco's point. The women aren't shutting up for the good of multiculturalism, and won't. Women have a hard time shutting up, believe it or not.

    Forget for a moment the fact that the hierarchy is not set in stone. Or the fact that you left out identities of perversion. Or the fact that perceived identities change. (What's a Jew to you could be just another white person to a black.) The major flaw in your thinking is that the various coalition members respect or are even aware of the hierarchy.

    If they are aware, they forget constantly. Which is why they may be called to task for not caring about innocent men period instead of specifying innocent white men. Because their group--womyn--is on their mind, not every other coalition group.

    I don't think it was, but just imagine if a real conflict was on her mind: i.e. blacks sexually assaulting womyn. According to your hierarchy, they have to shut up about it for the good of the cause. Can you think of a reason why they may have an incentive not to go along with that?

    “The women aren’t shutting up for the good of multiculturalism, and won’t. ”

    I agree completely. But opinions of women are (largely) irrelevant. What matters is powers that be (media, administrative state) pay attention to voices of women. In Rotterdam UK, white women did complain about rampant sexual abuse by Asian males. But to avoid rocking the multi-cultural boat, the authorities simply ignored their voices. I feel that if the rapists and pimps were a bunch of balding white men instead of balding Pakistanis, the authorities would have acted and the media class wouldn’t have been complicit in silencing the victims.

    “Can you think of a reason why they may have an incentive not to go along with that?”

    Again, I don’t think women may have an incentive in shutting up. But in an “intersectional” State, I don’t see their voices having much power.

    It’s possible (and I hope) I am wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Moses says:
    @Prof. Woland

    Here's an unpopular opinion: ...
     
    One problem for feminists with whom this sentiment IS popular is that the population is becoming more red pilled day by day and is catching on to women's true feelings on this and other subjects. Arrogant admissions like this one are only hastening that process.

    The proof of that is President Trump and soon to be Senator Roy Moore. Ten years ago, they would have probably not withstood the onslaught of smears they have endured. But more and more, the population is looking askance at such claims and it is going to take more than an accusation from a fabricated incident 20 + years ago to derail a career or lose a lawsuit.

    Assuming Moore is elected, the silver lining will be that women will now have to co-exist with the men they smeared and tried to banish. Same for Trump. Women lie all the time and pretty soon, even the White Knights will get it.

    I dunno. Some white knights will *never* get it.

    But yes, women lie all the time. Men too. I’ve found that women are naturally better at it though.

    Read the Bible. The ancients understood women.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @biz
    If Jews are at the top of that progressive stack, how do you explain the current popularity of Linda Sarsour, or the ongoing deification of antisemitic figures such as Malcolm X, or the bakery in Oakland with a huge mural of one of the Palestinian Arab terrorists, etc?

    > If Jews are at the top of that progressive stack, how do you explain …

    The Holocaust is proof that Adolf Hitler was a cuck.

    (Found on the interwebs.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. @Brabantian
    A relevant heart-rending story, singificantly deep-sixed by mainstream media more than usual

    30-year-old Angelica Wiktor of Vittaryd, Sweden, a lesbian, has apparently killed herself after being raped by two neighbour migrant males - alleged 'Syrians' (often a false nationality claim by migrants in Europe) - and after the Swedish authorities declined to prosecute the men, despite Angelica's personal testimony to police, medical authorities verifying she was raped, & the men continuing to stalk & harass her

    Apparently Angelica shared her story on Facebook before deliberately overdosing on drugs

    The story is all over various 'rightist' websites in multiple languages ... but it seems even semi-mainstream media are not touching it

    It's quite profound how a compelling story like this is hidden by alleged 'news media', making clear we have a bifurcated news 'reality' about key occurrences that expose the horror of Western governmental systems at their worst

    One comment seen about this, is that obviously the 'sh-tlibs' in fact don't really care at all about women, as they claim to do

    The now-suicided lesbian had originally been pleased to have 'refugees' given a home nearby

    I found very few *contemporary* references to her death on “alt-right” websites. Here’s one:

    https://petterssonsblogg.se/2017/06/20/angelica-ar-dod-och-garningsmannen-gar-fria/

    The other references (all over Europe, in many languages) seem to be from November, possibly due to pettersonblog writing about her again, possibly due to an independent journalist posting on Facebook (see links at the bottom):

    https://petterssonsblogg.se/2017/11/12/angelica-tog-sitt-liv-nar-hennes-valdtaktsanmalan-lades-ner-valdtaktsmannen-adnan-som-fatt-en-chans-i-sverige-gar-helt-fri/

    This is her Facebook page:

    https://www.facebook.com/angelica.wiktor

    There’s nothing about her on Snaphanen, Avpixlat, or Uriasposten.

    Snaphanen is a multi-lingual Scandinavian website about immigration problems (amongst other things), run by a Dane who used to live in Sweden so he speaks/reads fluent Swedish and has a deep interest in Swedish affairs. The rest of us Danes find written Swedish a bit hard: it’s like reading Scots or Shakespeare. You can do do it but only if you concentrate hard. Multi-lingual doesn’t mean “translated into your favourite language”. It means “sometimes in Danish, sometimes in Swedish”.

    The name comes from a Danish resistance movement in Scania after Sweden conquered it in the 1600′s.

    Avpixlat was a Swedish website about immigration. The name means “depixelated” and is a reference to the Swedish practice of blacking out, pixelating or even photoshopping the skin colour of criminals on photos and in videos. It recently rebranded itself and relaunched under the name Samhällsnyt (News about Society). If you want to look at the old stuff, you have to use archive.org with the http://avpixlat.info/ URL.

    She isn’t mentioned on Uriasposten, either.

    Uriasposten is a play on words: Urias (Uriah) was ordered by King David to fight in a place where he was guaranteed to be killed. An “uriaspost” is a position that is guaranteed to cause trouble for the person holding that position/job. “-Posten” is also a common suffix in newspaper names, similar to “Washington Post”.

    Those three websites usually have all the interesting immigration/crime news in Scandinavia so I’m surprised they didn’t write about her.

    (Not that they are the only ones in Scandinavia!)

    Here’s some background info on the case by an independent journalist:

    https://www.facebook.com/joakim.lamotte/photos/a.721663931261534.1073741829.713993068695287/1544068305687755/?type=3

    https://www.facebook.com/joakim.lamotte/photos/pb.713993068695287.-2207520000.1511184936./1552975321463720/?type=3

    The rape story seems to be correct but it would have been hard to get a conviction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. @Dahlia
    The biggest mistake in all my years on the internet, and it's been huge, was joining Twitter and using my real name and photo.

    Women of iSteve: Don't ever ID yourself on Twitter. Don't say to yourself, "but I'm too fill-in-the-blank to attract drama/attention." Do not do it.
    If you're here at Steve's, you probably aren't one for drama, otherwise, ignore everything I just said.

    I've been here at Steve's for about 15 years and they've been great years. A low-drama, mostly serene, funny, and even cozy place where I could relax and geek out; the worst fights ever engaged in were the Malthusian vs Cornucopian battles of old. People can get emotional here, but it's so greatly tempered by not seeing each other's faces.

    But I joined Twitter and ID'd myself and within a year and a half, life changed for the worse; it didn't happen overnight. It's not good for me right now, though the worst is over. It led me to being emotionally abused and ultimately assaulted. I'm not joking.

    I miss being the anonymous nerdy girl.

    I hate to hear what happened to you. The current web is really a terrible mess. The only people who don’t think so now are people with nothing to say and who just go with the flow. Even some of those poor people get plucked out of the herd and mercilessly tormented online for a while, before the mob and the media move on.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. Benny says:

    Feeble.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  178. Benny says:
    @Kylie
    "Women ARE our equals. What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be."

    And no woman in her right mind would want to be.

    Of course not; they’re too busy perving on their own rears. Intellectual stuff.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. dr kill says:
    @Charles Pewitt
    Emily Lindin's carefree insouciance regarding the treatment of innocent men in regards to improper behaviour is an indication that Fourth Wave Feminism has brought evil upon the earth. This distaff bitch Emily Lindin says she don't give a rat's ass if innocent men are fired during this current improper behaviour witch hunt. Feminism has always been most foul, but man-hating broads like Emily Lindin have eliminationist intentions for most men.

    Patriotic men remember that White Women Without College Degrees supported Trump in the 2016 presidential election. White Women With College Degrees went slightly in Hillary Clinton's favor. Men must not be seen as attacking all women when we respond to the anti-man provocations of nasty feminist tarts such as Emily Lindin.

    Emily Lindin and the rest of the anti-man Fourth Wave Feminists in the Democrat Party want to cut men's nuts off with a rusty lawn mower blade. These 4th Wave gals are mean bastards who will not hesitate to butcher every man they can get their paws on. Not every smiling broad in a pussy hat is a harmless creature screeching out some stupid nonsense. Some of these murderous broads have evil plans in store for all men, whether the men are decent or not.

    Weaponized White Women who have joined the anti-man cult have taken over a small faction of the Democrat Party. It is up to brave patriotic men and women who love America to stop these 4th Wave Feminist Thugs.

    The Guardian article she wrote claims sexual activity at age 11. Man, she was a smokin hot 14 yo. But the past 40 lbs haven’t done her any favors.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. Corvinus says:
    @Charles Erwin Wilson II

    It is a societal decision.
     
    No, it isn't. You cannot waive your constructionist, positivist, magic wand and change the chromosomes from X to Y. You are delusional.

    “No, it isn’t. You cannot waive your constructionist, positivist, magic wand and change the chromosomes from X to Y. You are delusional.”

    Do you even understand context? Radical Center stated “What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.” The implication here is that the political rights and social mores that have changed within the last 100 years regarding female opportunities in our society could be reverted back to those glorious “good old days”. I made mention of how today’s men and women will ultimately decide if they will “turn back the clock” or “move forward”.

    Furthermore, Christianity treated women well, but not Christians.

    “It is the post-Christian feminist heresy that endorses the supremacist ideology they demand.”

    IF our society was solely predicated on Christian ideals. Except we have in our nation the separation of church and state. Secularist ideas about the nature and roles of men and women in our society may not necessarily be rooted in traditional religious beliefs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    “What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.”
     
    And they are not. Check your dictionary, if you have a copy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous
    If you are concerned about turning women into conservatives, you are one who has not swallowed the red pill yet.

    A woman's political opinions are completely irrelevant. The political opinions she will have are those of the man that owns her. All else is liberal folly.

    The moon does not shine on its own, but it does reflect the light of the sun. The moon has no choice in this matter, it merely reflects exactly as it is shown upon.

    If women are not reflecting your own opinion back to you, you need to work on your own masculinity, your yang essence, your frame.

    You, white man, are the most powerful force in the known universe. Time to start acting like it.

    The result, I assure you, is completely exhilarating.

    “If you are concerned about turning women into conservatives, you are one who has not swallowed the red pill yet.”

    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It’s pseudo-intellectualism.

    “The political opinions she will have are those of the man that owns her. All else is liberal folly.”

    Men do not “own” women. They are not less than a man if he is unable to “rein” her in. I would surmise that you are married and desire to put your foot down more, but are rather weak minded. So, to alleviate your stress, you go on blogs and show how manly you are by crafting a narrative that is other than befitting of your current status. In other words, you are a “gamma” if one is keeping track of the scorecard at home.

    “You, white man, are the most powerful force in the known universe. Time to start acting like it.”

    You are no different than a radical feminist. Basically, if ALL white men refuse to think and act in a particular manner ALL of the time, they are other than masculine. Fortunately, we men make go our own way.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It’s pseudo-intellectualism.

    Actually, it's just a reference to a Keanu Reeves movie. I've never heard anyone make the claim that there's anything particularly intellectual about it.

    You're dumb.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "No, it isn’t. You cannot waive your constructionist, positivist, magic wand and change the chromosomes from X to Y. You are delusional."

    Do you even understand context? Radical Center stated “What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.” The implication here is that the political rights and social mores that have changed within the last 100 years regarding female opportunities in our society could be reverted back to those glorious "good old days". I made mention of how today's men and women will ultimately decide if they will "turn back the clock" or "move forward".

    Furthermore, Christianity treated women well, but not Christians.

    "It is the post-Christian feminist heresy that endorses the supremacist ideology they demand."

    IF our society was solely predicated on Christian ideals. Except we have in our nation the separation of church and state. Secularist ideas about the nature and roles of men and women in our society may not necessarily be rooted in traditional religious beliefs.

    “What they are not, and will never be, is THE SAME as men. Nor do they need to be.”

    And they are not. Check your dictionary, if you have a copy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "If you are concerned about turning women into conservatives, you are one who has not swallowed the red pill yet."

    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It's pseudo-intellectualism.

    "The political opinions she will have are those of the man that owns her. All else is liberal folly."

    Men do not "own" women. They are not less than a man if he is unable to "rein" her in. I would surmise that you are married and desire to put your foot down more, but are rather weak minded. So, to alleviate your stress, you go on blogs and show how manly you are by crafting a narrative that is other than befitting of your current status. In other words, you are a "gamma" if one is keeping track of the scorecard at home.

    "You, white man, are the most powerful force in the known universe. Time to start acting like it."

    You are no different than a radical feminist. Basically, if ALL white men refuse to think and act in a particular manner ALL of the time, they are other than masculine. Fortunately, we men make go our own way.

    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It’s pseudo-intellectualism.

    Actually, it’s just a reference to a Keanu Reeves movie. I’ve never heard anyone make the claim that there’s anything particularly intellectual about it.

    You’re dumb.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Actually, it’s just a reference to a Keanu Reeves movie."

    I'm quite aware of that reference, thank you very little.

    "I’ve never heard anyone make the claim that there’s anything particularly intellectual about it."

    Feel free to educate yourself.

    http://www.openculture.com/2017/03/the-philosophy-of-the-matrix.html

    And now a word about it from the Manosphere.

    https://therationalmale.com/category/the-matrix/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. @Barnard
    Her Twitter profile says she is writing a novel and is the founder of the unslut project. You have to wonder if this was a calculated effort to attract attention and increase her visibility online. She also could just be that mentally deranged, or it could be a combination of the two.

    She was shilling/fishing for content on Reddit (30th April 2013)
    She was dumb and evasive back then too.

    yourlegsgrow 6 points 4 years ago
    Do the people in your posts know that you are posting about them? Are you still friends with any of them?

    TheUnSlutProject[S] 18 points 4 years ago
    I am not close friends with any of the people in my posts, but we’re friends through social media, and for the most part they’ve grown up into really admirable people. I am writing under a pen name for just that reason – I don’t want them or anyone else to find out who the characters are. The point of The UnSlut Project is not to villainize them or anyone else, and I wouldn’t want to cause them any guilt or pain now.

    /too late you silly cow.

    GiveJesusPants -1 points 4 years ago
    … I’m having a hard time believing that the author is publishing her 11-year old private thoughts “word-for-word” while implementing techniques in her writing like foreshadowing and metaphors, and using words like “tentatively” and “communal.”
    TheUnSlutProject[S] 11 points 4 years ago
    This makes me kind of wish I weren’t writing under a pen name, so my actual 6th-grade English teacher could take some credit for her good work!
    Believe it or not, that’s the way I wrote as an 11-year-old.

    /humblebrag FTW

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. @The True and Original David
    People also pee among the tall slabs. And picnic on the short ones. The place looks strikingly trivial, a nothing.

    And it seems to be crumbling. Embarrassment.

    The way you build a Holocaust memorial is to construct an over-the-top haunted house so solid that will last 200+ years.

    And by "haunted house," I mean the kind of attraction that is temporarily opened in shopping malls every October 31. It should have actors shrieking behind glass, blood painted on walls, torture instruments on display, a gesticulating animatronic Führer in a red light, recorded screams coming from ubiquitous speakers, an "electric floor" room that gives visitors a brief electric shock, moveable displays to accommodate tie-ins to the latest Holocaust movie or TV special, etc. Only kitsch makes an impression on the moron masses.

    But does anyone listen to me about this? Oh boy, no. I get the wide-eyed stare and the slow backing-away every time.

    If they want quality replacements for their knockoff cowboy blocks, we could flog off the ones still littering almost any halfway decent beach on the east coast. Seems they’ll outlast Stonehenge.
    Here’s some handy Polish chaps we got in, to do the ones on the beach just north of The Royal & Ancient, across the Eden estuary.
    Kids are occasionally crushed by the larger ones, e.g. like those at Alnwick, digging in the sand under them, as no amount of dire warnings about relict UXB mines deters them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @anon
    I run a (mostly unsuccessful) software startup, but when I talk with my partner about having to hire, the main thing we've come up with is this: we shouldn't hire women for technical roles. Either (a) she's an SJW who's a "woman in tech!" and could sink the company when her incompetence shows or (b) she's not, but not really any better than a man. Where's the upside?

    If you need someone to man the phones, don’t hire a man. Hire a woman in her 50′s with a stable life.

    Don’t hire any weirdos or homos. They’re trouble waiting to happen. While I hate saying this, don’t hire disabled people either. They’re future workers’ comp claims.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. @anon
    A conservative philosophy that refuses to protect women will not turn women into conservatives.

    Protect women from what? Men NOT actually assaulting them, which is what this woman is talking about?

    Cuckservatism in a nutshell.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Bel Riose says:
    @Anon
    One aspect that people here seem to be missing is the possibility that leftist men are just more psychologically dysfunctional people in general, and more inclined to molest others.

    You mean leftist men like Corvinus!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. Corvinus says:
    @anon
    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It’s pseudo-intellectualism.

    Actually, it's just a reference to a Keanu Reeves movie. I've never heard anyone make the claim that there's anything particularly intellectual about it.

    You're dumb.

    “Actually, it’s just a reference to a Keanu Reeves movie.”

    I’m quite aware of that reference, thank you very little.

    “I’ve never heard anyone make the claim that there’s anything particularly intellectual about it.”

    Feel free to educate yourself.

    http://www.openculture.com/2017/03/the-philosophy-of-the-matrix.html

    And now a word about it from the Manosphere.

    https://therationalmale.com/category/the-matrix/

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    I’m quite aware of that reference, thank you very little.

    Yes, well, you didn't seem like you did, because you thought the very idea of it was "pseudo-intellectual".

    Feel free to educate yourself.

    Well, Corvinus, I'm sorry. I keep forgetting that, when I talk to you, I'm basically talking to a third-grader, so you have to make things really clear.

    Imagine someone said to you "Well, you win some, you lose some.".

    You wouldn't call that "pseudo-intellectual", because it's just a basic concept.

    Now, you could, if you wanted to, write endless books about game theory and the basic, fundamental structure of the universe, and whatever else, explaining WHY you win some and you lose some. But that doesn't mean a person is being "pseudo-intellectual" just by saying it.

    Similarly. You COULD get all intellectual by going in-depth into the concept of a "red pill", but that doesn't mean just saying "red pill" as a phrase is pseudo-intellectual.

    You know this, of course, and are just being a pain in the ass, like always. This is why nobody likes you.

    Also, I would like to reiterate that you are dumb.

    (And once again, nobody likes you.)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. @Curle
    "Women ARE our equals."

    Phrases like this obscure more than they enlighten. In very, very few ways are women the equal of men. They are complimentary, worthy of respect, better at some things, but calling them equals simply feeds and reinforces the equalist/blank slate religious view. Should they receive some degree of rights? Yes. Even rights specifically tailored to their unique needs. Aside from that, the whole equality charade needs to be dialed back it is pointless and increasingly brazen in its stupidity.

    They are complimentary

    Complementary.

    I haven’t heard many complements from them lately. And I mean toward my entire sex, not just me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. @Daniel Chieh
    I like nail polish on women and do notice that, for what it is worth.

    I like nail polish on women and do notice that, for what it is worth.

    Yes, but your name suggests that your recent ancestors may have engaged in foot-binding as well.

    Not that there’s anything wrong with that…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. @Captain Willard
    Sir:

    Salvatore Ferragamo, Bruno Magli, Jimmy Choo, Steve Madden, Christian Louboutin and Yves St. Laurent beg to differ

    Did you ever hear women sitting around admiring and discussing each other’s shoes? There’s something that no man cares about.

    Sir: Salvatore Ferragamo, Bruno Magli, Jimmy Choo, Steve Madden, Christian Louboutin and Yves St. Laurent beg to differ

    He said no MAN.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @Harry Baldwin
    Did you ever hear women sitting around admiring and discussing each other's shoes? There's something that no man cares about.

    Did you ever hear women sitting around admiring and discussing each other’s shoes? There’s something that no man cares about.

    A self-defense guru in the ’70s showed a talk-show host how stiletto heels could be used as a weapon on a man who gets a little too close for comfort while walking alongside a woman. Just jam one into his instep.

    Since watching that, I have kept a good, healthy distance from any woman in heels.

    Flat-bottom shoes, plain, trimmed nails, and no makeup or hair-dye are just fine with me. Maybe it’s the Yankee-German gene mix, or a reaction against postwar pop culture, but I like my women honest.

    Studying in Scandinavia 30+ years ago, I found the local girls so much nicer than the ones back home that I even started to prefer unshaven legs. But then, that’s unshaven fair-haired Scandinavian legs. Results may vary with latitude.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "Actually, it’s just a reference to a Keanu Reeves movie."

    I'm quite aware of that reference, thank you very little.

    "I’ve never heard anyone make the claim that there’s anything particularly intellectual about it."

    Feel free to educate yourself.

    http://www.openculture.com/2017/03/the-philosophy-of-the-matrix.html

    And now a word about it from the Manosphere.

    https://therationalmale.com/category/the-matrix/

    I’m quite aware of that reference, thank you very little.

    Yes, well, you didn’t seem like you did, because you thought the very idea of it was “pseudo-intellectual”.

    Feel free to educate yourself.

    Well, Corvinus, I’m sorry. I keep forgetting that, when I talk to you, I’m basically talking to a third-grader, so you have to make things really clear.

    Imagine someone said to you “Well, you win some, you lose some.”.

    You wouldn’t call that “pseudo-intellectual”, because it’s just a basic concept.

    Now, you could, if you wanted to, write endless books about game theory and the basic, fundamental structure of the universe, and whatever else, explaining WHY you win some and you lose some. But that doesn’t mean a person is being “pseudo-intellectual” just by saying it.

    Similarly. You COULD get all intellectual by going in-depth into the concept of a “red pill”, but that doesn’t mean just saying “red pill” as a phrase is pseudo-intellectual.

    You know this, of course, and are just being a pain in the ass, like always. This is why nobody likes you.

    Also, I would like to reiterate that you are dumb.

    (And once again, nobody likes you.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Yes, well, you didn’t seem like you did, because you thought the very idea of it was “pseudo-intellectual”."

    This red pill-blue pill-black pill phenomenon was invented by so called philosophers to separate "real men" from the chaff. If men neglect to adhere to its basic principles, they are not "masculine". It's a cult cut from the same cloth as SJW's and the Alt Right.

    Well, Corvinus, I’m sorry. I keep forgetting that, when I talk to you, I’m basically talking to a third-grader, so you have to make things really clear.

    "Imagine someone said to you “Well, you win some, you lose some.”. You wouldn’t call that “pseudo-intellectual”, because it’s just a basic concept."

    "Now, you could, if you wanted to, write endless books about game theory and the basic, fundamental structure of the universe, and whatever else, explaining WHY you win some and you lose some. But that doesn’t mean a person is being “pseudo-intellectual” just by saying it."

    It would the explanations behind "why you win some and lose some" that would be labeled as "pseudo-intellectual" should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations. You just are not that bright.

    "Similarly. You COULD get all intellectual by going in-depth into the concept of a “red pill”, but that doesn’t mean just saying “red pill” as a phrase is pseudo-intellectual."

    Again, it is that in-depth reasoning as to why the "red pill-blue pill" dichotomy is pseudo-intellectual.

    http://www.doctornerdlove.com/the-red-pill/

    "Also, I would like to reiterate that you are dumb. (And once again, nobody likes you.)"

    Talk about being acting like a third grader!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. el topo says:
    @Malcolm X-Lax
    She does get points for not warning people just how snarky she can be.

    I’ve seen many dating profiles in which the woman specifies that her prospective mate “must speak sarcasm”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ScarletNumber
    This is known as a red flag
    , @Malcolm X-Lax
    Vomit inducing; especially when it's a woman over 30.
    , @Escher
    On this Thanksgiving, I am grateful for not being on the dating market.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. @el topo
    I've seen many dating profiles in which the woman specifies that her prospective mate "must speak sarcasm".

    This is known as a red flag

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. Corvinus says:
    @anon
    I’m quite aware of that reference, thank you very little.

    Yes, well, you didn't seem like you did, because you thought the very idea of it was "pseudo-intellectual".

    Feel free to educate yourself.

    Well, Corvinus, I'm sorry. I keep forgetting that, when I talk to you, I'm basically talking to a third-grader, so you have to make things really clear.

    Imagine someone said to you "Well, you win some, you lose some.".

    You wouldn't call that "pseudo-intellectual", because it's just a basic concept.

    Now, you could, if you wanted to, write endless books about game theory and the basic, fundamental structure of the universe, and whatever else, explaining WHY you win some and you lose some. But that doesn't mean a person is being "pseudo-intellectual" just by saying it.

    Similarly. You COULD get all intellectual by going in-depth into the concept of a "red pill", but that doesn't mean just saying "red pill" as a phrase is pseudo-intellectual.

    You know this, of course, and are just being a pain in the ass, like always. This is why nobody likes you.

    Also, I would like to reiterate that you are dumb.

    (And once again, nobody likes you.)

    “Yes, well, you didn’t seem like you did, because you thought the very idea of it was “pseudo-intellectual”.”

    This red pill-blue pill-black pill phenomenon was invented by so called philosophers to separate “real men” from the chaff. If men neglect to adhere to its basic principles, they are not “masculine”. It’s a cult cut from the same cloth as SJW’s and the Alt Right.

    Well, Corvinus, I’m sorry. I keep forgetting that, when I talk to you, I’m basically talking to a third-grader, so you have to make things really clear.

    “Imagine someone said to you “Well, you win some, you lose some.”. You wouldn’t call that “pseudo-intellectual”, because it’s just a basic concept.”

    “Now, you could, if you wanted to, write endless books about game theory and the basic, fundamental structure of the universe, and whatever else, explaining WHY you win some and you lose some. But that doesn’t mean a person is being “pseudo-intellectual” just by saying it.”

    It would the explanations behind “why you win some and lose some” that would be labeled as “pseudo-intellectual” should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations. You just are not that bright.

    “Similarly. You COULD get all intellectual by going in-depth into the concept of a “red pill”, but that doesn’t mean just saying “red pill” as a phrase is pseudo-intellectual.”

    Again, it is that in-depth reasoning as to why the “red pill-blue pill” dichotomy is pseudo-intellectual.

    http://www.doctornerdlove.com/the-red-pill/

    “Also, I would like to reiterate that you are dumb. (And once again, nobody likes you.)”

    Talk about being acting like a third grader!

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    This red pill-blue pill-black pill phenomenon was invented by so called philosophers to separate “real men” from the chaff. If men neglect to adhere to its basic principles, they are not “masculine”.

    No, dummy. The phenomenon wasn't "invented" by anyone, much less a "so called philosopher". The concept of red pill vs blue pill is just an analogy for the actual fact of whether or not you see through the propaganda society feeds you. That's all it means. It's an idea that's been around forever. The red pill/blue pill thing is just the analogy that was used to appeal to a generation familiar with The Matrix. Nobody who did this claimed to be a "philosopher".

    It would the explanations behind “why you win some and lose some” that would be labeled as “pseudo-intellectual” should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations. You just are not that bright.

    I'm bright enough to know that "It would the explanations behind 'why you win some and lose some' that would be labeled as 'pseudo-intellectual' should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations." isn't a sentence.

    Again, it is that in-depth reasoning as to why the “red pill-blue pill” dichotomy is pseudo-intellectual.

    There is nothing whatsoever that is pseudo-intellectual about the concept that some people are tricked by what society tells them, and some people see through to the truth. It's a simple and basic observation that everyone understands, that was just given a metaphorical name from a movie that young men thought was cool. Only a worthless person that everyone hates would have a hard time understanding this.

    Talking to you is like trying to explain the facts of the Trayvon Martin case to a black person. You could take a leave of absence from your job, and spend six months explaining it to them, and their brains just weren't npowerful enough to understand the very simple facts of the case.

    So, on this Thanksgiving, I would like to announce my thankfulness for the brain I have, that is superior than the brains of your kind.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "Yes, well, you didn’t seem like you did, because you thought the very idea of it was “pseudo-intellectual”."

    This red pill-blue pill-black pill phenomenon was invented by so called philosophers to separate "real men" from the chaff. If men neglect to adhere to its basic principles, they are not "masculine". It's a cult cut from the same cloth as SJW's and the Alt Right.

    Well, Corvinus, I’m sorry. I keep forgetting that, when I talk to you, I’m basically talking to a third-grader, so you have to make things really clear.

    "Imagine someone said to you “Well, you win some, you lose some.”. You wouldn’t call that “pseudo-intellectual”, because it’s just a basic concept."

    "Now, you could, if you wanted to, write endless books about game theory and the basic, fundamental structure of the universe, and whatever else, explaining WHY you win some and you lose some. But that doesn’t mean a person is being “pseudo-intellectual” just by saying it."

    It would the explanations behind "why you win some and lose some" that would be labeled as "pseudo-intellectual" should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations. You just are not that bright.

    "Similarly. You COULD get all intellectual by going in-depth into the concept of a “red pill”, but that doesn’t mean just saying “red pill” as a phrase is pseudo-intellectual."

    Again, it is that in-depth reasoning as to why the "red pill-blue pill" dichotomy is pseudo-intellectual.

    http://www.doctornerdlove.com/the-red-pill/

    "Also, I would like to reiterate that you are dumb. (And once again, nobody likes you.)"

    Talk about being acting like a third grader!

    This red pill-blue pill-black pill phenomenon was invented by so called philosophers to separate “real men” from the chaff. If men neglect to adhere to its basic principles, they are not “masculine”.

    No, dummy. The phenomenon wasn’t “invented” by anyone, much less a “so called philosopher”. The concept of red pill vs blue pill is just an analogy for the actual fact of whether or not you see through the propaganda society feeds you. That’s all it means. It’s an idea that’s been around forever. The red pill/blue pill thing is just the analogy that was used to appeal to a generation familiar with The Matrix. Nobody who did this claimed to be a “philosopher”.

    It would the explanations behind “why you win some and lose some” that would be labeled as “pseudo-intellectual” should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations. You just are not that bright.

    I’m bright enough to know that “It would the explanations behind ‘why you win some and lose some’ that would be labeled as ‘pseudo-intellectual’ should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations.” isn’t a sentence.

    Again, it is that in-depth reasoning as to why the “red pill-blue pill” dichotomy is pseudo-intellectual.

    There is nothing whatsoever that is pseudo-intellectual about the concept that some people are tricked by what society tells them, and some people see through to the truth. It’s a simple and basic observation that everyone understands, that was just given a metaphorical name from a movie that young men thought was cool. Only a worthless person that everyone hates would have a hard time understanding this.

    Talking to you is like trying to explain the facts of the Trayvon Martin case to a black person. You could take a leave of absence from your job, and spend six months explaining it to them, and their brains just weren’t npowerful enough to understand the very simple facts of the case.

    So, on this Thanksgiving, I would like to announce my thankfulness for the brain I have, that is superior than the brains of your kind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The concept of red pill vs blue pill is just an analogy for the actual fact of whether or not you see through the propaganda society feeds you. That’s all it means. It’s an idea that’s been around forever."

    [Whoosh] there goes context over your head yet again. Of course the idea was "invented" or "created" by someone. And what has occurred is that people have taken it to mean something they want it to mean. It's more than a perspective, in fact: it's a philosophy, with several men and women who since that film came out have developed their own interpretations. The basis of this philosophy, which underpins almost all conversations in this community, is that females get away with things by virtue of being female. The foundations for their explanations, as evident by the link I provided, can be logically deduced as being "pseudo-intellectual".

    Again, follow carefully. The concept of red pill vs. blue pill is not labeled "pseudo-intellectual", it is the arguments offered by the philosophers in that community that is labeled "pseudo-intellectual" by individuals who break down those arguments, in particular the manosphere that says it has the "truth" about male-female relationships and male-female behavior.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. @el topo
    I've seen many dating profiles in which the woman specifies that her prospective mate "must speak sarcasm".

    Vomit inducing; especially when it’s a woman over 30.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. Escher says:
    @el topo
    I've seen many dating profiles in which the woman specifies that her prospective mate "must speak sarcasm".

    On this Thanksgiving, I am grateful for not being on the dating market.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    I am grateful for not being on the dating market.
     
    True. It sucks beyond words.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. Escher says:
    @RadicalCenter
    Perhaps, unlike American women today, those women didn't weigh more than the men they were trying to attract.

    And were not man-hating harridans hunting for micro-aggressions in every statement and action of their suitors.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. Lurker says:
    @Forbes
    Precisely. Four- and five-figure handbags never got any guy's motor running. Don't even start on shoes...

    Four- and five-figure handbags never got any guy’s motor running. Don’t even start on shoes…

    Handbags never got any guy’s motor running. FTFY.

    Shoes otoh . . .I think sexy shoes can really help a lady. But most normal men certainly won’t know or care what designer was responsible, price tag etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. Corvinus says:
    @anon
    This red pill-blue pill-black pill phenomenon was invented by so called philosophers to separate “real men” from the chaff. If men neglect to adhere to its basic principles, they are not “masculine”.

    No, dummy. The phenomenon wasn't "invented" by anyone, much less a "so called philosopher". The concept of red pill vs blue pill is just an analogy for the actual fact of whether or not you see through the propaganda society feeds you. That's all it means. It's an idea that's been around forever. The red pill/blue pill thing is just the analogy that was used to appeal to a generation familiar with The Matrix. Nobody who did this claimed to be a "philosopher".

    It would the explanations behind “why you win some and lose some” that would be labeled as “pseudo-intellectual” should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations. You just are not that bright.

    I'm bright enough to know that "It would the explanations behind 'why you win some and lose some' that would be labeled as 'pseudo-intellectual' should individuals offer cogent analysis that would call into question the rationale behind those explanations." isn't a sentence.

    Again, it is that in-depth reasoning as to why the “red pill-blue pill” dichotomy is pseudo-intellectual.

    There is nothing whatsoever that is pseudo-intellectual about the concept that some people are tricked by what society tells them, and some people see through to the truth. It's a simple and basic observation that everyone understands, that was just given a metaphorical name from a movie that young men thought was cool. Only a worthless person that everyone hates would have a hard time understanding this.

    Talking to you is like trying to explain the facts of the Trayvon Martin case to a black person. You could take a leave of absence from your job, and spend six months explaining it to them, and their brains just weren't npowerful enough to understand the very simple facts of the case.

    So, on this Thanksgiving, I would like to announce my thankfulness for the brain I have, that is superior than the brains of your kind.

    “The concept of red pill vs blue pill is just an analogy for the actual fact of whether or not you see through the propaganda society feeds you. That’s all it means. It’s an idea that’s been around forever.”

    [Whoosh] there goes context over your head yet again. Of course the idea was “invented” or “created” by someone. And what has occurred is that people have taken it to mean something they want it to mean. It’s more than a perspective, in fact: it’s a philosophy, with several men and women who since that film came out have developed their own interpretations. The basis of this philosophy, which underpins almost all conversations in this community, is that females get away with things by virtue of being female. The foundations for their explanations, as evident by the link I provided, can be logically deduced as being “pseudo-intellectual”.

    Again, follow carefully. The concept of red pill vs. blue pill is not labeled “pseudo-intellectual”, it is the arguments offered by the philosophers in that community that is labeled “pseudo-intellectual” by individuals who break down those arguments, in particular the manosphere that says it has the “truth” about male-female relationships and male-female behavior.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Of course the idea was “invented” or “created” by someone.

    You said the phenomenon was invented. And it wasn't. The phenomenon was a naturally-ocurring thing. The analogy was created, obviously, but that's not what you said.

    You are dumb and nobody likes you.

    And what has occurred is that people have taken it to mean something they want it to mean.

    Perhaps, but you can't blame the people who created the term for that.

    It’s more than a perspective, in fact: it’s a philosophy, with several men and women who since that film came out have developed their own interpretations.

    They may have, but that doesn't mean that anyone who uses the phrase "take the red pill" is an adherent of that philosophy. Any more than anyone who says he is "trying to be objective" is a follower of the philosophy called "Objectivism".

    If you had an IQ over 85, you would understand this.

    The basis of this philosophy, which underpins almost all conversations in this community, is that females get away with things by virtue of being female.

    It's not really relevant, but the fact is, they do, as a great many of them will admit.

    The concept of red pill vs. blue pill is not labeled “pseudo-intellectual”,

    Here is what you said:

    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It’s pseudo-intellectualism.

    You didn't say "Some people who use the phrase 'take the red pill' are using it in a pseudo-intellectual fashion.". You said the dichotomy was pseudo-intellectualism.

    Corvinus, I don't get why you do this. You argue about the stupidest shit, and, due to the fact that you are so dumb, you never win. All you ever do is make yourself look stupid. Why do you do that? Why don't you ever just realize that you're full of shit, and just stop arguing? Do you just like looking like an idiot?

    Is it because you're dumb and nobody likes you?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "The concept of red pill vs blue pill is just an analogy for the actual fact of whether or not you see through the propaganda society feeds you. That’s all it means. It’s an idea that’s been around forever."

    [Whoosh] there goes context over your head yet again. Of course the idea was "invented" or "created" by someone. And what has occurred is that people have taken it to mean something they want it to mean. It's more than a perspective, in fact: it's a philosophy, with several men and women who since that film came out have developed their own interpretations. The basis of this philosophy, which underpins almost all conversations in this community, is that females get away with things by virtue of being female. The foundations for their explanations, as evident by the link I provided, can be logically deduced as being "pseudo-intellectual".

    Again, follow carefully. The concept of red pill vs. blue pill is not labeled "pseudo-intellectual", it is the arguments offered by the philosophers in that community that is labeled "pseudo-intellectual" by individuals who break down those arguments, in particular the manosphere that says it has the "truth" about male-female relationships and male-female behavior.

    Of course the idea was “invented” or “created” by someone.

    You said the phenomenon was invented. And it wasn’t. The phenomenon was a naturally-ocurring thing. The analogy was created, obviously, but that’s not what you said.

    You are dumb and nobody likes you.

    And what has occurred is that people have taken it to mean something they want it to mean.

    Perhaps, but you can’t blame the people who created the term for that.

    It’s more than a perspective, in fact: it’s a philosophy, with several men and women who since that film came out have developed their own interpretations.

    They may have, but that doesn’t mean that anyone who uses the phrase “take the red pill” is an adherent of that philosophy. Any more than anyone who says he is “trying to be objective” is a follower of the philosophy called “Objectivism”.

    If you had an IQ over 85, you would understand this.

    The basis of this philosophy, which underpins almost all conversations in this community, is that females get away with things by virtue of being female.

    It’s not really relevant, but the fact is, they do, as a great many of them will admit.

    The concept of red pill vs. blue pill is not labeled “pseudo-intellectual”,

    Here is what you said:

    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It’s pseudo-intellectualism.

    You didn’t say “Some people who use the phrase ‘take the red pill’ are using it in a pseudo-intellectual fashion.”. You said the dichotomy was pseudo-intellectualism.

    Corvinus, I don’t get why you do this. You argue about the stupidest shit, and, due to the fact that you are so dumb, you never win. All you ever do is make yourself look stupid. Why do you do that? Why don’t you ever just realize that you’re full of shit, and just stop arguing? Do you just like looking like an idiot?

    Is it because you’re dumb and nobody likes you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    It's because he's a troll and wants people to talk to him rather than about the article.
    , @Corvinus
    "You said the phenomenon was invented. And it wasn’t. The phenomenon was a naturally-ocurring thing. The analogy was created, obviously, but that’s not what you said."

    The red pill-blue pill phenomenon is a concept. It was invented, created, developed, whatever word you want to use by a person or people, who made an observation of their world and proceeded to label it in this manner. The directors of the Matrix indicated that their trilogy pays homage to historical myths and philosophy, most notably existentialism and nihilism. An extension of red pill-blue pill has been those on the manosphere who claim to have "observable truths" about male-female relationships, as well as a "social-sexual hierarchy", based on scientific principles. However, I provided a link that calls into serious question the positions taken by these manospherists, who in my estimation are sophists, aka pseudo-intellectuals.

    "You didn’t say “Some people who use the phrase ‘take the red pill’ are using it in a pseudo-intellectual fashion.”. You said the dichotomy was pseudo-intellectualism."

    The dichotomy as employed by the manospherists is pseudo-intellectualism. That was the intent. I cannot help that you missed it time and time again.

    "Why do you do that? Why don’t you ever just realize that you’re full of shit, and just stop arguing? Do you just like looking like an idiot?"

    As I have stated before, projection is your strong suit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. @Escher
    On this Thanksgiving, I am grateful for not being on the dating market.

    I am grateful for not being on the dating market.

    True. It sucks beyond words.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @anon
    Of course the idea was “invented” or “created” by someone.

    You said the phenomenon was invented. And it wasn't. The phenomenon was a naturally-ocurring thing. The analogy was created, obviously, but that's not what you said.

    You are dumb and nobody likes you.

    And what has occurred is that people have taken it to mean something they want it to mean.

    Perhaps, but you can't blame the people who created the term for that.

    It’s more than a perspective, in fact: it’s a philosophy, with several men and women who since that film came out have developed their own interpretations.

    They may have, but that doesn't mean that anyone who uses the phrase "take the red pill" is an adherent of that philosophy. Any more than anyone who says he is "trying to be objective" is a follower of the philosophy called "Objectivism".

    If you had an IQ over 85, you would understand this.

    The basis of this philosophy, which underpins almost all conversations in this community, is that females get away with things by virtue of being female.

    It's not really relevant, but the fact is, they do, as a great many of them will admit.

    The concept of red pill vs. blue pill is not labeled “pseudo-intellectual”,

    Here is what you said:

    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It’s pseudo-intellectualism.

    You didn't say "Some people who use the phrase 'take the red pill' are using it in a pseudo-intellectual fashion.". You said the dichotomy was pseudo-intellectualism.

    Corvinus, I don't get why you do this. You argue about the stupidest shit, and, due to the fact that you are so dumb, you never win. All you ever do is make yourself look stupid. Why do you do that? Why don't you ever just realize that you're full of shit, and just stop arguing? Do you just like looking like an idiot?

    Is it because you're dumb and nobody likes you?

    It’s because he’s a troll and wants people to talk to him rather than about the article.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. Corvinus says:
    @anon
    Of course the idea was “invented” or “created” by someone.

    You said the phenomenon was invented. And it wasn't. The phenomenon was a naturally-ocurring thing. The analogy was created, obviously, but that's not what you said.

    You are dumb and nobody likes you.

    And what has occurred is that people have taken it to mean something they want it to mean.

    Perhaps, but you can't blame the people who created the term for that.

    It’s more than a perspective, in fact: it’s a philosophy, with several men and women who since that film came out have developed their own interpretations.

    They may have, but that doesn't mean that anyone who uses the phrase "take the red pill" is an adherent of that philosophy. Any more than anyone who says he is "trying to be objective" is a follower of the philosophy called "Objectivism".

    If you had an IQ over 85, you would understand this.

    The basis of this philosophy, which underpins almost all conversations in this community, is that females get away with things by virtue of being female.

    It's not really relevant, but the fact is, they do, as a great many of them will admit.

    The concept of red pill vs. blue pill is not labeled “pseudo-intellectual”,

    Here is what you said:

    This red pill-blue pill dichotomy is an overindulgence by men. It’s pseudo-intellectualism.

    You didn't say "Some people who use the phrase 'take the red pill' are using it in a pseudo-intellectual fashion.". You said the dichotomy was pseudo-intellectualism.

    Corvinus, I don't get why you do this. You argue about the stupidest shit, and, due to the fact that you are so dumb, you never win. All you ever do is make yourself look stupid. Why do you do that? Why don't you ever just realize that you're full of shit, and just stop arguing? Do you just like looking like an idiot?

    Is it because you're dumb and nobody likes you?

    “You said the phenomenon was invented. And it wasn’t. The phenomenon was a naturally-ocurring thing. The analogy was created, obviously, but that’s not what you said.”

    The red pill-blue pill phenomenon is a concept. It was invented, created, developed, whatever word you want to use by a person or people, who made an observation of their world and proceeded to label it in this manner. The directors of the Matrix indicated that their trilogy pays homage to historical myths and philosophy, most notably existentialism and nihilism. An extension of red pill-blue pill has been those on the manosphere who claim to have “observable truths” about male-female relationships, as well as a “social-sexual hierarchy”, based on scientific principles. However, I provided a link that calls into serious question the positions taken by these manospherists, who in my estimation are sophists, aka pseudo-intellectuals.

    “You didn’t say “Some people who use the phrase ‘take the red pill’ are using it in a pseudo-intellectual fashion.”. You said the dichotomy was pseudo-intellectualism.”

    The dichotomy as employed by the manospherists is pseudo-intellectualism. That was the intent. I cannot help that you missed it time and time again.

    “Why do you do that? Why don’t you ever just realize that you’re full of shit, and just stop arguing? Do you just like looking like an idiot?”

    As I have stated before, projection is your strong suit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    The red pill-blue pill phenomenon is a concept.

    No, the red-pill/blue-pill phenomenon is a real thing. That nobody invented.

    It was invented, created, developed, whatever word you want to use by a person or people, who made an observation of their world and proceeded to label it in this manner.

    This is false. The person or people simply described something that was already there, and none of them were pretending to be particularly intellectual.

    The directors of the Matrix indicated that their trilogy pays homage to historical myths and philosophy, most notably existentialism and nihilism.

    Nobody cares.

    An extension of red pill-blue pill has been those on the manosphere who claim to have “observable truths” about male-female relationships, as well as a “social-sexual hierarchy”, based on scientific principles.

    That is one extension, but that does not mean that it is the only use of the phrase ever.

    You know this, but you keep talking anyway. Proving, once again, why everyone hates you.

    However, I provided a link that calls into serious question the positions taken by these manospherists, who in my estimation are sophists, aka pseudo-intellectuals.

    That link was written by some stupid feminist. Here is what she says.


    Before we get too deep into this, we should start by defining some terms.

    The Red Pill is, for all intents and purposes, what happens when the pick-up community decides that it hates women.
     

    This is not what it means. No serious person would ever claim that that is all that the term "red pill" means. Only a feminist would ever say something so knowingly dishonest, and only a worthless, inferior being that everyone hates would ever take a feminist of this nature seriously.

    The dichotomy as employed by the manospherists is pseudo-intellectualism. That was the intent. I cannot help that you missed it time and time again.

    Sure you could. You could have cleared it up by saying "I'm sorry, anon! I misspoke! I didn't mean what I clearly said! I did this because I am stupid and nobody likes me! I will now stick my head in the oven. Please forgive me.".

    But you didn't, did you? No. You just kept arguing. Which, once again, is mysterious behavior, considering that your brain isn't powerful enough to argue with any of the white men on iSteve. All you do by arguing is make this more and more obvious.

    Why not just stop?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "You said the phenomenon was invented. And it wasn’t. The phenomenon was a naturally-ocurring thing. The analogy was created, obviously, but that’s not what you said."

    The red pill-blue pill phenomenon is a concept. It was invented, created, developed, whatever word you want to use by a person or people, who made an observation of their world and proceeded to label it in this manner. The directors of the Matrix indicated that their trilogy pays homage to historical myths and philosophy, most notably existentialism and nihilism. An extension of red pill-blue pill has been those on the manosphere who claim to have "observable truths" about male-female relationships, as well as a "social-sexual hierarchy", based on scientific principles. However, I provided a link that calls into serious question the positions taken by these manospherists, who in my estimation are sophists, aka pseudo-intellectuals.

    "You didn’t say “Some people who use the phrase ‘take the red pill’ are using it in a pseudo-intellectual fashion.”. You said the dichotomy was pseudo-intellectualism."

    The dichotomy as employed by the manospherists is pseudo-intellectualism. That was the intent. I cannot help that you missed it time and time again.

    "Why do you do that? Why don’t you ever just realize that you’re full of shit, and just stop arguing? Do you just like looking like an idiot?"

    As I have stated before, projection is your strong suit.

    The red pill-blue pill phenomenon is a concept.

    No, the red-pill/blue-pill phenomenon is a real thing. That nobody invented.

    It was invented, created, developed, whatever word you want to use by a person or people, who made an observation of their world and proceeded to label it in this manner.

    This is false. The person or people simply described something that was already there, and none of them were pretending to be particularly intellectual.

    The directors of the Matrix indicated that their trilogy pays homage to historical myths and philosophy, most notably existentialism and nihilism.

    Nobody cares.

    An extension of red pill-blue pill has been those on the manosphere who claim to have “observable truths” about male-female relationships, as well as a “social-sexual hierarchy”, based on scientific principles.

    That is one extension, but that does not mean that it is the only use of the phrase ever.

    You know this, but you keep talking anyway. Proving, once again, why everyone hates you.

    However, I provided a link that calls into serious question the positions taken by these manospherists, who in my estimation are sophists, aka pseudo-intellectuals.

    That link was written by some stupid feminist. Here is what she says.

    Before we get too deep into this, we should start by defining some terms.

    The Red Pill is, for all intents and purposes, what happens when the pick-up community decides that it hates women.

    This is not what it means. No serious person would ever claim that that is all that the term “red pill” means. Only a feminist would ever say something so knowingly dishonest, and only a worthless, inferior being that everyone hates would ever take a feminist of this nature seriously.

    The dichotomy as employed by the manospherists is pseudo-intellectualism. That was the intent. I cannot help that you missed it time and time again.

    Sure you could. You could have cleared it up by saying “I’m sorry, anon! I misspoke! I didn’t mean what I clearly said! I did this because I am stupid and nobody likes me! I will now stick my head in the oven. Please forgive me.”.

    But you didn’t, did you? No. You just kept arguing. Which, once again, is mysterious behavior, considering that your brain isn’t powerful enough to argue with any of the white men on iSteve. All you do by arguing is make this more and more obvious.

    Why not just stop?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "No, the red-pill/blue-pill phenomenon is a real thing. That nobody invented."

    You are decidedly in error and are doubling down like an SJW. Red-pill/blue-pill did not just magically happen. It was invented, created, developed, whatever word you want to use by a person or people, who made an observation of their world and proceeded to label it in this manner.

    "Nobody cares."

    Actually, the manospherists care, as they developed their theory about the nature of male-female relationships and their

    "You know this, but you keep talking anyway. Proving, once again, why everyone hates you."

    The train is fine, the train is fine.

    "That link was written by some stupid feminist. Here is what she says."

    It was written by a man who, among other men, offer cogent analysis as to the pseudo-intellectualism of the red pill-blue pill dichotomy as offered by the manospherists. What is now required is for you to offer a rebuttal rather than stammer your feet and clench your fists.

    "Why not just stop?"

    I agree. You keep embarrassing yourself here. You are like the Washington Generals losing every time to the Harlem Globetrotters.

    Are you done here?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. eah says:
    @eah
    Amazing 3-tweet story.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH0V4AExFqC.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH3VoAE0jjm.jpg

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPMIeH1U8AEzxBh.jpg

    (((white supremacy)))

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. Corvinus says:
    @anon
    The red pill-blue pill phenomenon is a concept.

    No, the red-pill/blue-pill phenomenon is a real thing. That nobody invented.

    It was invented, created, developed, whatever word you want to use by a person or people, who made an observation of their world and proceeded to label it in this manner.

    This is false. The person or people simply described something that was already there, and none of them were pretending to be particularly intellectual.

    The directors of the Matrix indicated that their trilogy pays homage to historical myths and philosophy, most notably existentialism and nihilism.

    Nobody cares.

    An extension of red pill-blue pill has been those on the manosphere who claim to have “observable truths” about male-female relationships, as well as a “social-sexual hierarchy”, based on scientific principles.

    That is one extension, but that does not mean that it is the only use of the phrase ever.

    You know this, but you keep talking anyway. Proving, once again, why everyone hates you.

    However, I provided a link that calls into serious question the positions taken by these manospherists, who in my estimation are sophists, aka pseudo-intellectuals.

    That link was written by some stupid feminist. Here is what she says.


    Before we get too deep into this, we should start by defining some terms.

    The Red Pill is, for all intents and purposes, what happens when the pick-up community decides that it hates women.
     

    This is not what it means. No serious person would ever claim that that is all that the term "red pill" means. Only a feminist would ever say something so knowingly dishonest, and only a worthless, inferior being that everyone hates would ever take a feminist of this nature seriously.

    The dichotomy as employed by the manospherists is pseudo-intellectualism. That was the intent. I cannot help that you missed it time and time again.

    Sure you could. You could have cleared it up by saying "I'm sorry, anon! I misspoke! I didn't mean what I clearly said! I did this because I am stupid and nobody likes me! I will now stick my head in the oven. Please forgive me.".

    But you didn't, did you? No. You just kept arguing. Which, once again, is mysterious behavior, considering that your brain isn't powerful enough to argue with any of the white men on iSteve. All you do by arguing is make this more and more obvious.

    Why not just stop?

    “No, the red-pill/blue-pill phenomenon is a real thing. That nobody invented.”

    You are decidedly in error and are doubling down like an SJW. Red-pill/blue-pill did not just magically happen. It was invented, created, developed, whatever word you want to use by a person or people, who made an observation of their world and proceeded to label it in this manner.

    “Nobody cares.”

    Actually, the manospherists care, as they developed their theory about the nature of male-female relationships and their

    “You know this, but you keep talking anyway. Proving, once again, why everyone hates you.”

    The train is fine, the train is fine.

    “That link was written by some stupid feminist. Here is what she says.”

    It was written by a man who, among other men, offer cogent analysis as to the pseudo-intellectualism of the red pill-blue pill dichotomy as offered by the manospherists. What is now required is for you to offer a rebuttal rather than stammer your feet and clench your fists.

    “Why not just stop?”

    I agree. You keep embarrassing yourself here. You are like the Washington Generals losing every time to the Harlem Globetrotters.

    Are you done here?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. Runshyt says:
    @Tim Howells
    Like everything else it depends a lot on race. If you're White, then if you give your girlfriend a dirty look, that just might be rape! On the other hand an African style gang rape is probably just a cultural misunderstanding and not worth mentioning. In fact even mentioning it is racist and also sexist since shows that you think White women are your personal property. I've actually had several lectures on this from highly qualified feminists so let me know if you need anything cleared up.

    You’re really full of it! If anything, men of color are always…always…ALWAYS…guilty until proven innocent. But your white male fragility permits you to make up garbage. Your post is a hot, steaming load of bs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tim Howells

    men of color are always…always…ALWAYS…guilty until proven innocent.
     
    Hmmm. Like that sweet little innocent Trayvon Martin and the "gentle giant" Michael Brown, I guess. Care to give a counter-example?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. Romanian says: • Website
    @Louis Renault

    Bikinis or burkas. It’s up to you.
     
    Meme of the day.

    Wasn’t there a theory making the rounds on how women are actually choosing “burqas”, because mating patterns today have led them into an exhausting arms race (effort, money, self-mutilation and resentment if getting older and alone or if never particularly blessed in the first place) for the attention of a few high value men and an increasing number of them find the “burqa” to be a valuable respite from a battle they are too tired to fight anymore or were never going to win?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. Romanian says: • Website
    @Anon
    Good points. Also I never heard of Victorian or Georgian women finding men particularly difficult to attract.

    A third of them died as spinsters during Victorian times. They became either too old, or their beaus died in some war, or many other reasons. Selection happens not just through having more children, but also by not having any at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Yeah, "maiden aunts" were a thing. (1/3) seems pretty high though. Does it include women who died as children?

    As for natural selection-- you think women nowadays are prettier? I dunno.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Romanian
    A third of them died as spinsters during Victorian times. They became either too old, or their beaus died in some war, or many other reasons. Selection happens not just through having more children, but also by not having any at all.

    Yeah, “maiden aunts” were a thing. (1/3) seems pretty high though. Does it include women who died as children?

    As for natural selection– you think women nowadays are prettier? I dunno.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Romanian
    Natural selection is not about making people smarter or prettier and it is sometimes not obvious what traits the process is selecting for. It is neutral with regards to desirability of traits. As with gene-culture co-evolution, if you use cultural means to stop someone from breeding, that will have an impact down the line.

    I cannot find a reference, it stuck with me from something I have read. I found this bachelor thesis that claims 12% https://is.muni.cz/th/216171/ff_b/Thesis.doc Still a lot!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. @Runshyt
    You’re really full of it! If anything, men of color are always...always...ALWAYS...guilty until proven innocent. But your white male fragility permits you to make up garbage. Your post is a hot, steaming load of bs.

    men of color are always…always…ALWAYS…guilty until proven innocent.

    Hmmm. Like that sweet little innocent Trayvon Martin and the “gentle giant” Michael Brown, I guess. Care to give a counter-example?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. Romanian says: • Website
    @Anon
    Yeah, "maiden aunts" were a thing. (1/3) seems pretty high though. Does it include women who died as children?

    As for natural selection-- you think women nowadays are prettier? I dunno.

    Natural selection is not about making people smarter or prettier and it is sometimes not obvious what traits the process is selecting for. It is neutral with regards to desirability of traits. As with gene-culture co-evolution, if you use cultural means to stop someone from breeding, that will have an impact down the line.

    I cannot find a reference, it stuck with me from something I have read. I found this bachelor thesis that claims 12% https://is.muni.cz/th/216171/ff_b/Thesis.doc Still a lot!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments are moderated by iSteve, at whim.


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?