The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Economist: GOP "Increasingly Unified Around Whiteness"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From The Economist:

Basic instincts

Identity politics are stronger on the right than the left
The Republican Party is increasingly unified around whiteness

Print edition | United States, Nov 1st 2018

In the popular imagination, identity politics is the stuff of queer-studies seminars and Hillary Clinton rallies. The excesses of intolerant university students raging against misogyny, racism and homophobia have been rigorously catalogued. Rather less attention has been paid to the appetite for a different kind of identity politics—one centred around whiteness and championed by President Donald Trump. This kind of right-leaning identity politics is more potent than the left-leaning version. There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened, which binds the Trumpian Republican Party together.

It’s almost as if the Democrats could use a single cause which unifies their Coalition of the Margins … like their sense that whites deserve to be threatened.

For evidence of this, look no further than the president’s closing arguments a week before the mid-term elections on November 6th. Worried about the damage that a Democratic wave in the mid-terms could wreak, Mr Trump has fed his base an artery-clogging diet of red meat.

Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?

Recently leaked news that his administration is planning to rip up Obama-era rules on the treatment of transgender people was a poke in the eye for political correctness. The president has also seized on the useful image of a caravan of Central American migrants heading to the southern border.

Mr Trump and his allies have claimed that the caravan is an “invasion” harbouring, among other things, criminals, “Middle Easterners” (apparently meaning terrorists) and “diseases” such as leprosy. (At least the last of these can be deterred by a course of antibiotics.)

So what are you white Republicans worrying about? If, say, your child is in increased danger of catching leprosy at school, don’t you know that leprosy can be deterred by a course of antibiotics?

Checkmate, white people!

In summary, white people started it all by racistly noticing the fate that we at The Economist had long been working on for them.

 
Hide 115 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. “…artery-clogging diet of red meat.”

    “Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?”

    Yes. Although the Dems still believe red meat leads to seizures…

    “The president has also seized on the useful image of a caravan..”

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri


    artery-clogging diet of red meat.
     
    Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?
     
    Depends if it is grass fed or not.
  2. If you assume that someone who looks Black, Hispanic or Asian will vote Democrat you will be right 75%+ of the time. For Caucasians it’s much closer to 50-50.

    • Replies: @istevefan

    For Caucasians it’s much closer to 50-50.
     
    The only reason elections are not a foregone conclusion is because Whites don't bloc-vote, yet.
    , @The Alarmist
    Such open-mindedness is doing wonders for South Africa.
  3. Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?

    You mean “in the mid-terms”? It was never in-date constitutionally.

    Congressional elections in World Cup years are equal to those in Olympic years. How hard is that for everybody to grasp?

    Exceedingly, evidently.

  4. The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Might not?

    This is flaming neo-communist propaganda right here. No sane and honest person would ever claim that identity politics is stronger on the right than the left. I'm outraged just from reading that. These are evil, deeply dishonest people.
    , @Fidelios Automata
    I canceled that globalist rag a long time ago.
    , @Cagey Beast
    The Economist is being left-wing when it promotes the free flow of cheap labour around the world; they're being good British liberals. Indian labourers were brought on steamships to Fiji and the British West Indies to cut sugarcane, not because the British were lefties.
    , @Svigor
    Yer a hard man.
    , @notanon
    big business pretending to believe in SJW identity politics out of a desire for open borders for cheap labor is one of the critical factors to understand in modern politics.
    , @AnonyBot
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    The Economist has actually published a few op-eds recently that seem somewhat further to the right on the issue than they were a few years ago. Granted they still want open borders and probably would not have moved (slightly) to the right if not for Orban and Brexit and Trump and so on, but there you have it.
    , @Realist

    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time
     
    You mean you're still wasting your money on that shit???
    , @Unladen Swallow
    They moved left sometime ago, although they held out a lot longer than American newsmagazines did. Read an article a few years back where they were completely dumbfounded about why the black students were not doing anywhere near as well academically as Europeans and Asian students in South Africa. Of course it was still the fault of Afrikaners.
    , @Forbes
    I dropped the NYT in 2000, even as I knew they were left-liberal to begin with, but their hectoring about what to think became oppressive and unbearable.

    I dropped The Economist long before that. A conservative (in temperament), though classically liberal (ordered liberty with limited government) in politics, that yielding to progressive-left (top-down, one-size-fits-all) partisanship is simply an about-face in substance.

    They made their choice--I made my choice.
  5. …the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened…

    Oh, yeah, the “white voters” who feel threatened think they used to be top dogs.

    • Agree: Desiderius, RVBlake
  6. Worried about the damage that a Democratic wave in the mid-terms could wreak, Mr Trump has fed his base an artery-clogging diet of red meat.

    Reminds me of this recent Tweet from some twerp at Vox:

    • Replies: @Olorin
    The absolute state of Twitard punditry.

    > regurgitate others' stereotypes about middle Americans
    > "well, it makes me mad"
    , @Lurker
    At least he admits he's mad. It's progress of a sort.
    , @Realist
    Obviously written by a lib from one of our large shit hole cities.

    He sounds jealous to me.

    , @BigDickNick
    Suburban Americans = bad character traits
    Somalis and mexicans = good character traits


    How anyone can look at the environments these groups produce and honestly believe this stuff I don't know. I dont think I can be convinced ALL of these people are signaling for personal advancement. Some have to seriously believe this crap.
  7. Gee, I wonder why importing a bunch of people who live off our taxes, commit crimes against us at outsize rates, hate our guts and want us gone, and trying to force us to integrate with them, enacting quotas against our people getting places at university, good jobs, etc. might cause us to embrace identity politics.

    Ya think?

    • Agree: ben tillman
  8. “Basic Instincts”…Hmm. Doesn’t sound Jewish.

  9. Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?

    I’m not sure. Some say that red meat is fine if that’s all you eat, and that it’s bad if you eat it with starches like bread, potatoes, pasta, rice, etc., which is how most people eat it.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Also bad if you load up on that stuff without the meat.
    , @Rosie

    I’m not sure. Some say that red meat is fine if that’s all you eat, and that it’s bad if you eat it with starches like bread, potatoes, pasta, rice, etc., which is how most people eat it.

     

    There is absolutely no point in eating a steak without potatoes.
  10. @Hank Archer
    If you assume that someone who looks Black, Hispanic or Asian will vote Democrat you will be right 75%+ of the time. For Caucasians it's much closer to 50-50.

    For Caucasians it’s much closer to 50-50.

    The only reason elections are not a foregone conclusion is because Whites don’t bloc-vote, yet.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Do they in South Africa?
    , @The preferred nomenclature is...
    Does any race commit suicide at the White rate, I mean even remotely close to the White rate.

    https://afsp.org/about-suicide/suicide-statistics/

    Other than American Indians, no. American Indians; another conquered race and a people who lost their heritage.
  11. Whatever happened to “white sales”? Didn’t they use to take place on Washington’s birthday?

    • Replies: @International Jew
    And what about "white courtesy phones" at airports? (As in "Rege Cæsare, pick up the white courtesy phone.")
    , @Olorin
    I've waited half a century now to see an MLK BD white sale.
    , @Forbes
    The "white sale" at Bloomingdale's and Macy's still occur in January, or did, IIRC.

    Sheets and towels on sale--maybe they've all converted to the "bed & bath sale."
    , @Bill jones
    The white sales had to end because all the whites were sold out.
  12. @istevefan

    For Caucasians it’s much closer to 50-50.
     
    The only reason elections are not a foregone conclusion is because Whites don't bloc-vote, yet.

    Do they in South Africa?

    • Replies: @Anon
    I doubt it. If nothing else, I hear Dutch and British cultures are quite different. The "Democratic Alliance" seems to get a lot of the non-black vote though.

    In South Africa if you say you're a WASP you're a communist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers_and_Socialist_Party
    , @ben tillman
    They do in South Carolina.
    , @NickG

    Do they in South Africa?
     
    Yes - most whites vote Democratic Alliance.
  13. In the popular imagination, identity politics is the stuff of queer-studies seminars and Hillary Clinton rallies. The excesses of intolerant university students raging against misogyny, racism and homophobia have been rigorously catalogued.

    So Democrat identity politics has had nothing to do with appealing to blacks as blacks, hispanics as hispanics, or women as women.

    Instead, it has something to do with the excesses of college campus life. And it seems the topic has already been beaten to death.

    Thanks for setting us straight, The Economist!

    [Trump] also floated the idea of abolishing birthright citizenship by executive order. The fact that the text of the 14th Amendment bars such action is no matter

    So, the text of the Fourteenth Amendment specifies that America must grant citizenship to babies of illegal aliens and birth tourist aliens?

    I did not know that! And to think I’ve read the Fourteenth Amendment countless times! Thanks again, The Economist!

  14. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    Might not?

    This is flaming neo-communist propaganda right here. No sane and honest person would ever claim that identity politics is stronger on the right than the left. I’m outraged just from reading that. These are evil, deeply dishonest people.

    • Agree: L Woods
  15. The writers at the Economist seem to be wondering out loud what happens now that the mass immigration pyramid scheme is being openly questioned by more and more Whites in America. Good question.

  16. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    I canceled that globalist rag a long time ago.

    • Replies: @syonredux

    I canceled that globalist rag a long time ago.
     
    I just read the copy in the library reading room at my uni.
  17. The role that The Economist has envisioned for whites is one of a deeply hated, highly productive, highly taxed minority. Not that they have great plans for any group of goyim, but the whites are going to get it the hardest. At least that’s their plan.

    • Replies: @Bleuteaux

    The role that The Economist has envisioned for whites is one of a deeply hated, highly productive, highly taxed minority.
     
    Excellent comment, and descriptive of every office environment I've seen or heard of.

    Shut up, keep the machines running, don't complain, and "give back" half your paycheck to all those not as privileged as you.

  18. The Dems are “unified around whiteness” too. Just in a different way.

  19. and “diseases” such as leprosy

    And “journalists” such as this guy.
    And “publications” such as this.

    Gee, that is clever.

  20. @Reg Cæsar
    Whatever happened to "white sales"? Didn't they use to take place on Washington's birthday?

    And what about “white courtesy phones” at airports? (As in “Rege Cæsare, pick up the white courtesy phone.”)

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    Our airport's are black.
  21. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    The Economist is being left-wing when it promotes the free flow of cheap labour around the world; they’re being good British liberals. Indian labourers were brought on steamships to Fiji and the British West Indies to cut sugarcane, not because the British were lefties.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    He meant to say "isn't being left-wing."

    Though it is certainly still up for debate whether the free movement of peoples is left-wing or not. It was the Commintern after all. Stalin only went nationalist because he had to.
    , @ben tillman

    The Economist is being left-wing when it promotes the free flow of cheap labour around the world; they’re being good British liberals. Indian labourers were brought on steamships to Fiji and the British West Indies to cut sugarcane, not because the British were lefties.
     
    To the contrary, what you have described constitutes being "lefties".
  22. We are moving toward the inevitable equilibrium. The wildcard of course is how much the Jewish media will choose to escalate things. Are they going to back off? Maybe realize that Whites just want the border under control and don’t particlarly want to send them to the gas chambers? Or freak out and do increasingly crazier things to forestall (but actually incite) the Fourth Reich?

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true. The narrative is something like, well, yes, we are trying to flood you with immigrants. But we aren’t doing it to destroy White civilization per se. We are doing it because of our insecurities and history of persecution and are merely destroying White civilization incidentally.

    From Twitter

    https://mobile.twitter.com/BorzoiBoskovic/status/1059192442560438272

    • Replies: @Rosie

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true.
     
    Have you seen this one?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/11/anti-semitism-inherent-trumps-nativism/574672/

    The circumstances today, however, are vastly different. One reason hateful nativism so easily morphs into anti-Semitism in the Trump era is that today Jews really do disproportionately support immigration. The major American Jewish organizations overwhelmingly oppose Trump’s immigration policies. So do rank-and-file American Jews, according to several polls. Among whites, Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the civil-rights movement, too.

    The segregationist anti-Semites of the mid-20th century and the nativist anti-Semites of today are wrong about Jews’ motives. Jews didn’t support civil rights then—and they don’t support immigrants’ rights now—because they want to subjugate white Christians. They’re just predisposed—because of their understanding of Jewish history—to identify with outsiders and fear ethnically and religiously exclusive definitions of Americanism. But people who demonize African Americans or Latino and Muslim immigrants notice that predisposition, and it leads them to demonize Jews, too.
     
    Notice here again this peculiar belief on the part of Jews that it is perfectly acceptable to destroy the White race so long as it is, as you say, "incidental."
  23. @International Jew
    And what about "white courtesy phones" at airports? (As in "Rege Cæsare, pick up the white courtesy phone.")

    Our airport’s are black.

    • Replies: @Neil Templeton
    Not so good for you. Not only would you be stymied as your brain obsessively computed all potential anagrams of "white courtesy phone" and "black courtesy phone", but you would also have to estimate the probability that the hostess might have maliciously conflated white with black, and the probability that she had singled out you, of all airport patrons, to demonstrate the structural racism of the airport identification of telephones, and (hopefully, finally) the probability that other airporters would believe you if you demonstrated that the phones were black, and always had been, and were never intended to be white, not even for a moment.
  24. Identity politics are stronger on the right than the left

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    No.

    But soon.

  25. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    Yer a hard man.

  26. There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened, which binds the Trumpian Republican Party together.

    Hatred of White, Christian, Cis-Het men doesn’t count?

    • Replies: @Svigor

    There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened, which binds the Trumpian Republican Party together.
     
    Yes, the Democrat Party is a coalition of White Uncle Toms, Black racialists, Jewish racialists, and assorted other non-White racialists. We could quibble over my use of racialist here but we all know what I mean.

    So yes, the White Uncle Tom faction does diminish the Democrat racialist motif somewhat. 'Course he's just daft about the GOP being White racialist.

    But soon.

    , @Forbes

    There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters
     
    One marvels at the equivalence between the Democratic Party and some white voters. Apparently, the status of some binds the Trumpian Republican Party together, while it's a mystery the Democratic Party doesn't disappear for lack of unifying cause...
  27. @Fidelios Automata
    I canceled that globalist rag a long time ago.

    I canceled that globalist rag a long time ago.

    I just read the copy in the library reading room at my uni.

  28. @Anonymous

    Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?
     
    I'm not sure. Some say that red meat is fine if that's all you eat, and that it's bad if you eat it with starches like bread, potatoes, pasta, rice, etc., which is how most people eat it.

    Also bad if you load up on that stuff without the meat.

  29. @Cagey Beast
    The Economist is being left-wing when it promotes the free flow of cheap labour around the world; they're being good British liberals. Indian labourers were brought on steamships to Fiji and the British West Indies to cut sugarcane, not because the British were lefties.

    He meant to say “isn’t being left-wing.”

    Though it is certainly still up for debate whether the free movement of peoples is left-wing or not. It was the Commintern after all. Stalin only went nationalist because he had to.

    • Replies: @ben tillman

    Though it is certainly still up for debate whether the free movement of peoples is left-wing or not.
     
    Up for debate? How could it possibly be anything other than left-wing?
    , @Anonymous
    Comintern = Commie International (though ended up interning a lot of folks in practice)

    I thought you were going to point out Marx's criticism of coolie labor which appears in The Communist Manifesto among other writings. By contrast, much of the current "free movement of peoples" pabulum spews from opportunistic nationalists (well, nationalists on behalf of another nation than the one they're exploiting)
    , @Cagey Beast
    Thanks for catching my typo.

    Yes, you're right about Stalin as well.
  30. anon[414] • Disclaimer says:

    The Economist took a hard left turn after it was bought by a Rothschild. They used to have a comments section after every article that was very active, and in almost every article readers expressed vastly different views than the editorials, and these commies shut it down. I used to subscribe and read it cover to cover. Since 2016 I no longer even bothered visiting the website.

    It’s time for them to rename themselves The Globalist. This third rate rag has never met an immigrant they don’t love. Everyday is hug an immigrant day and every other day is hug a Muslim day at TE. And if they’re not obsessing over immigration, they’re obsessing over sex, especially over gays and transgenders. Once again the chosen have turned a once great magazine into shite, like they do everything else.

    • Replies: @Cowboy shaw
    I read it every week cover to cover for twenty five years. I can't stand to look at it now. I wonder what their readership stats are saying. This view seems to be so widespread that it must be showing up in their sales. Maybe they've decided good riddance to middle aged white men - their readership is booming among Indian data scientists or something.
    , @Anonymous
    The comments section was very good. Then one day, without any warning or explanation, it was suddenly gone.
  31. @Anonymous

    Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?
     
    I'm not sure. Some say that red meat is fine if that's all you eat, and that it's bad if you eat it with starches like bread, potatoes, pasta, rice, etc., which is how most people eat it.

    I’m not sure. Some say that red meat is fine if that’s all you eat, and that it’s bad if you eat it with starches like bread, potatoes, pasta, rice, etc., which is how most people eat it.

    There is absolutely no point in eating a steak without potatoes.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  32. @gregor
    We are moving toward the inevitable equilibrium. The wildcard of course is how much the Jewish media will choose to escalate things. Are they going to back off? Maybe realize that Whites just want the border under control and don’t particlarly want to send them to the gas chambers? Or freak out and do increasingly crazier things to forestall (but actually incite) the Fourth Reich?

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true. The narrative is something like, well, yes, we are trying to flood you with immigrants. But we aren’t doing it to destroy White civilization per se. We are doing it because of our insecurities and history of persecution and are merely destroying White civilization incidentally.

    From Twitter

    https://mobile.twitter.com/BorzoiBoskovic/status/1059192442560438272

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true.

    Have you seen this one?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/11/anti-semitism-inherent-trumps-nativism/574672/

    The circumstances today, however, are vastly different. One reason hateful nativism so easily morphs into anti-Semitism in the Trump era is that today Jews really do disproportionately support immigration. The major American Jewish organizations overwhelmingly oppose Trump’s immigration policies. So do rank-and-file American Jews, according to several polls. Among whites, Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the civil-rights movement, too.

    The segregationist anti-Semites of the mid-20th century and the nativist anti-Semites of today are wrong about Jews’ motives. Jews didn’t support civil rights then—and they don’t support immigrants’ rights now—because they want to subjugate white Christians. They’re just predisposed—because of their understanding of Jewish history—to identify with outsiders and fear ethnically and religiously exclusive definitions of Americanism. But people who demonize African Americans or Latino and Muslim immigrants notice that predisposition, and it leads them to demonize Jews, too.

    Notice here again this peculiar belief on the part of Jews that it is perfectly acceptable to destroy the White race so long as it is, as you say, “incidental.”

    • Replies: @Olorin
    Is that Beinart's piece?

    The one where he effectively points out that Jews and Adolf Hitler have the same talking points about Jewish character and group strategies in their host countries?

    Not that the normie readers of The Atlantic will think into/get it....
    , @anon
    It's obvious. Jews support mass immigration from the third world so they won't be the only group of outsiders in America. Teaming up with blacks wasn't enough because whites still vastly outnumbered both groups.

    But WASP elites do their part. The Seattle area is drowning in Chinese and Indians, and their anchor babies are taking over our schools. The #1 importer of all this diversity? Bill Gates. They're all his H1B code coolies, either directly employed by Microsoft or indirectly through an outsourcing firm like Infosys.

    I'm thankful Amazon is establishing HQ2 and HQ3 somewhere else, possibly Dallas and Northern Virginia. Just wish Microsoft would do the same and move the hell somewhere else, preferably to CA, that state is already ruined, no need to go ruin another Red state. WA used to be solidly red, until Gates turned it blue with his tech plantation and multi-culti army.

    , @Anonymous
    I love his self-complimenting rationalization there, which of course, technically, doesn't conflict with the premise he's supposedly refuted: that activist Hebrews don't hate goy society, they just really really like NAM peasants who will battle low-status non-pedigreed goyim in economic warfare. Yep, no signs of malice there *at all*.

    By his own facile terms it's easy to retort that mobilized Judaica promotes wholesale society-wrecking immigration because it's no skin off their back, or threat to their own clannish intra-group's concerns, and is actually quite helpful to the ol' wallet in some ways. Yahweh said let my people have cheap maids and gardeners.

    , @gregor
    Another one from NYT’s Bari Weiss:

    https://youtu.be/ngXPO9-ex04

    This idea that they are a constitutionally welcoming people would be a lot more plausible if they had eagerly welcomed those 40,000 African migrants that showed up in Israel instead of trying to dump them on Europe.
  33. @Anonymous

    Worried about the damage that a Democratic wave in the mid-terms could wreak, Mr Trump has fed his base an artery-clogging diet of red meat.
     
    Reminds me of this recent Tweet from some twerp at Vox:

    https://twitter.com/drvox/status/1058473742207115264

    The absolute state of Twitard punditry.

    > regurgitate others’ stereotypes about middle Americans
    > “well, it makes me mad”

  34. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    big business pretending to believe in SJW identity politics out of a desire for open borders for cheap labor is one of the critical factors to understand in modern politics.

    • Replies: @Lucas McCrudy
    "big business pretending to believe in SJW identity politics out of a desire for open borders for cheap labor is one of the critical factors to understand in modern politics."
    Ain't that the truth. Just look at the ads big coproporations are putting out these days; vast overrepsresntation of non-whites. especially blacks, with many ads blantantly anti-white. You'd never guess blacks are only 13% of the population and that the purchasing power of whites, both by median income and sheer numbers, vastly outstrips them.
    , @Forbes
    But are they pretending? How could you know? Does the outcome make any difference if they are pretending?
  35. @Rosie

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true.
     
    Have you seen this one?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/11/anti-semitism-inherent-trumps-nativism/574672/

    The circumstances today, however, are vastly different. One reason hateful nativism so easily morphs into anti-Semitism in the Trump era is that today Jews really do disproportionately support immigration. The major American Jewish organizations overwhelmingly oppose Trump’s immigration policies. So do rank-and-file American Jews, according to several polls. Among whites, Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the civil-rights movement, too.

    The segregationist anti-Semites of the mid-20th century and the nativist anti-Semites of today are wrong about Jews’ motives. Jews didn’t support civil rights then—and they don’t support immigrants’ rights now—because they want to subjugate white Christians. They’re just predisposed—because of their understanding of Jewish history—to identify with outsiders and fear ethnically and religiously exclusive definitions of Americanism. But people who demonize African Americans or Latino and Muslim immigrants notice that predisposition, and it leads them to demonize Jews, too.
     
    Notice here again this peculiar belief on the part of Jews that it is perfectly acceptable to destroy the White race so long as it is, as you say, "incidental."

    Is that Beinart’s piece?

    The one where he effectively points out that Jews and Adolf Hitler have the same talking points about Jewish character and group strategies in their host countries?

    Not that the normie readers of The Atlantic will think into/get it….

  36. The Economist ignores the most important point.

    If it becomes whites versus everyone else, the whites win.

    This wasn’t my idea, and it’s still not my preference, but if it has to be, I’m up for it.

    • Replies: @Mark Raven

    If it becomes whites versus everyone else, the whites win.
     
    It's been that way for decades, and whites aren't winning.

    They're vanishing.

  37. It won’t let me quote it but the two lines beginning “the excesses of intolerant” and ending “championed by President Donald Trump” are perfectly Orwellian.

  38. @istevefan

    For Caucasians it’s much closer to 50-50.
     
    The only reason elections are not a foregone conclusion is because Whites don't bloc-vote, yet.

    Does any race commit suicide at the White rate, I mean even remotely close to the White rate.

    https://afsp.org/about-suicide/suicide-statistics/

    Other than American Indians, no. American Indians; another conquered race and a people who lost their heritage.

  39. ‘…There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened…’

    The tediously repeated irony here that the one group of whites who are most definitely ‘top dogs’ are Jews, and yet it is almost invariably they who denounce the remaining whites, who as a rule merely want to preserve the rather nice country they built for themselves and can still vaguely remember.

    Few whites particularly feel any need to be more affluent than anyone else or in any other way ‘top dog.’ This is just denigrating our perfectly reasonable desire to have a decent home for ourselves and our children. It doesn’t particularly disturb me, for example, that several ethnic groups — Jews among them — are wealthier than gentile whites. It does disturb me when, not content with their actual wealth and privilege, they want to accuse me of having it instead, so that they can hound and persecute me.

    • Agree: Kylie
    • Replies: @Desiderius

    Few whites
     
    Doesn't take many. Jews themselves are only 2% of the population, and most of those are harmless conservative/Orthodox Jews.
    , @Svigor

    The tediously repeated irony here that the one group of whites who are most definitely ‘top dogs’ are Jews, and yet it is almost invariably they who denounce the remaining whites
     
    Yeah it's totally not obvious what their self-serving schtick is here.
  40. @Anonymous

    Worried about the damage that a Democratic wave in the mid-terms could wreak, Mr Trump has fed his base an artery-clogging diet of red meat.
     
    Reminds me of this recent Tweet from some twerp at Vox:

    https://twitter.com/drvox/status/1058473742207115264

    At least he admits he’s mad. It’s progress of a sort.

  41. Speaking of slanted news. Is it just me or has Drudge moved more to the Left the last 18 months or so. For example, he sure has been touting all those fake polls showing Dems up by wide margins. It is subtle but it’s there. I’ve been following him from almost the beginning of his site (just like I’ve followed Mr. Sailer) and I don’t think I am wrong in my analysis of his leftward tilt.

    • Agree: Federalist
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Speaking of slanted news. Is it just me or has Drudge moved more to the Left the last 18 months or so. For example, he sure has been touting all those fake polls showing Dems up by wide margins. It is subtle but it’s there. I’ve been following him from almost the beginning of his site (just like I’ve followed Mr. Sailer) and I don’t think I am wrong in my analysis of his leftward tilt.
     
    Yeah, the DrudgeReport is now pretty much in line with MSM in general. I noticed the shift about a year ago or so as well. I mentioned this to family members who support Trump and they agreed and had stopped going there. I have also seen posts on FreeRepublic about Drudge’s new left slant and all the replies agreed. It had to have happened after the election because Trump was praising Drudge during his election rallies two-plus years ago.
  42. @Colin Wright
    '...There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened...'

    The tediously repeated irony here that the one group of whites who are most definitely 'top dogs' are Jews, and yet it is almost invariably they who denounce the remaining whites, who as a rule merely want to preserve the rather nice country they built for themselves and can still vaguely remember.

    Few whites particularly feel any need to be more affluent than anyone else or in any other way 'top dog.' This is just denigrating our perfectly reasonable desire to have a decent home for ourselves and our children. It doesn't particularly disturb me, for example, that several ethnic groups -- Jews among them -- are wealthier than gentile whites. It does disturb me when, not content with their actual wealth and privilege, they want to accuse me of having it instead, so that they can hound and persecute me.

    Few whites

    Doesn’t take many. Jews themselves are only 2% of the population, and most of those are harmless conservative/Orthodox Jews.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    dele
    , @ben tillman

    Doesn’t take many. Jews themselves are only 2% of the population, and most of those are harmless conservative/Orthodox Jews.
     
    LOL. You can't be serious.

    First, 2% is more than sufficient. Two percent (or three percent at the time) was enough to own the whole damn national media for decades. You should understand, though for some reason you can't, that 200 million white Americans were thereby indoctrinated to act in a way that convinces you that they are part of the problem. THEY'RE NOT. There are some collaborators, but the anti-white project is a Jewish project.

    Second, harmless conservative Jews? What? Conservative Jews, in general, are a crucial part of the organized Jewish community.
  43. @AndrewR
    Do they in South Africa?

    I doubt it. If nothing else, I hear Dutch and British cultures are quite different. The “Democratic Alliance” seems to get a lot of the non-black vote though.

    In South Africa if you say you’re a WASP you’re a communist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers_and_Socialist_Party

  44. @Reg Cæsar
    Whatever happened to "white sales"? Didn't they use to take place on Washington's birthday?

    I’ve waited half a century now to see an MLK BD white sale.

  45. anon[414] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rosie

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true.
     
    Have you seen this one?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/11/anti-semitism-inherent-trumps-nativism/574672/

    The circumstances today, however, are vastly different. One reason hateful nativism so easily morphs into anti-Semitism in the Trump era is that today Jews really do disproportionately support immigration. The major American Jewish organizations overwhelmingly oppose Trump’s immigration policies. So do rank-and-file American Jews, according to several polls. Among whites, Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the civil-rights movement, too.

    The segregationist anti-Semites of the mid-20th century and the nativist anti-Semites of today are wrong about Jews’ motives. Jews didn’t support civil rights then—and they don’t support immigrants’ rights now—because they want to subjugate white Christians. They’re just predisposed—because of their understanding of Jewish history—to identify with outsiders and fear ethnically and religiously exclusive definitions of Americanism. But people who demonize African Americans or Latino and Muslim immigrants notice that predisposition, and it leads them to demonize Jews, too.
     
    Notice here again this peculiar belief on the part of Jews that it is perfectly acceptable to destroy the White race so long as it is, as you say, "incidental."

    It’s obvious. Jews support mass immigration from the third world so they won’t be the only group of outsiders in America. Teaming up with blacks wasn’t enough because whites still vastly outnumbered both groups.

    But WASP elites do their part. The Seattle area is drowning in Chinese and Indians, and their anchor babies are taking over our schools. The #1 importer of all this diversity? Bill Gates. They’re all his H1B code coolies, either directly employed by Microsoft or indirectly through an outsourcing firm like Infosys.

    I’m thankful Amazon is establishing HQ2 and HQ3 somewhere else, possibly Dallas and Northern Virginia. Just wish Microsoft would do the same and move the hell somewhere else, preferably to CA, that state is already ruined, no need to go ruin another Red state. WA used to be solidly red, until Gates turned it blue with his tech plantation and multi-culti army.

    • Replies: @Cowboy shaw
    Something really weird is going on in Gates' brain. Is he not noticing any of this stuff?
  46. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    The Economist has actually published a few op-eds recently that seem somewhat further to the right on the issue than they were a few years ago. Granted they still want open borders and probably would not have moved (slightly) to the right if not for Orban and Brexit and Trump and so on, but there you have it.

  47. @Reg Cæsar
    Our airport's are black.

    Not so good for you. Not only would you be stymied as your brain obsessively computed all potential anagrams of “white courtesy phone” and “black courtesy phone”, but you would also have to estimate the probability that the hostess might have maliciously conflated white with black, and the probability that she had singled out you, of all airport patrons, to demonstrate the structural racism of the airport identification of telephones, and (hopefully, finally) the probability that other airporters would believe you if you demonstrated that the phones were black, and always had been, and were never intended to be white, not even for a moment.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Gosh. That must be why they work at NASA.
  48. @syonredux

    There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened, which binds the Trumpian Republican Party together.
     
    Hatred of White, Christian, Cis-Het men doesn't count?

    There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened, which binds the Trumpian Republican Party together.

    Yes, the Democrat Party is a coalition of White Uncle Toms, Black racialists, Jewish racialists, and assorted other non-White racialists. We could quibble over my use of racialist here but we all know what I mean.

    So yes, the White Uncle Tom faction does diminish the Democrat racialist motif somewhat. ‘Course he’s just daft about the GOP being White racialist.

    But soon.

  49. @Colin Wright
    '...There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened...'

    The tediously repeated irony here that the one group of whites who are most definitely 'top dogs' are Jews, and yet it is almost invariably they who denounce the remaining whites, who as a rule merely want to preserve the rather nice country they built for themselves and can still vaguely remember.

    Few whites particularly feel any need to be more affluent than anyone else or in any other way 'top dog.' This is just denigrating our perfectly reasonable desire to have a decent home for ourselves and our children. It doesn't particularly disturb me, for example, that several ethnic groups -- Jews among them -- are wealthier than gentile whites. It does disturb me when, not content with their actual wealth and privilege, they want to accuse me of having it instead, so that they can hound and persecute me.

    The tediously repeated irony here that the one group of whites who are most definitely ‘top dogs’ are Jews, and yet it is almost invariably they who denounce the remaining whites

    Yeah it’s totally not obvious what their self-serving schtick is here.

  50. @Colin Wright
    The Economist ignores the most important point.

    If it becomes whites versus everyone else, the whites win.

    This wasn't my idea, and it's still not my preference, but if it has to be, I'm up for it.

    If it becomes whites versus everyone else, the whites win.

    It’s been that way for decades, and whites aren’t winning.

    They’re vanishing.

  51. All politics is based in identity. All identity is political. The Economist article above is merely ignorance and projection. In the end, when all additive errors cancel, identity=politics.

  52. @Desiderius

    Few whites
     
    Doesn't take many. Jews themselves are only 2% of the population, and most of those are harmless conservative/Orthodox Jews.

    dele

  53. Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?

    Like race denial, it was always out of date scientifically.

  54. @AndrewR
    Do they in South Africa?

    They do in South Carolina.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The South has always bloc voted.
  55. @Cagey Beast
    The Economist is being left-wing when it promotes the free flow of cheap labour around the world; they're being good British liberals. Indian labourers were brought on steamships to Fiji and the British West Indies to cut sugarcane, not because the British were lefties.

    The Economist is being left-wing when it promotes the free flow of cheap labour around the world; they’re being good British liberals. Indian labourers were brought on steamships to Fiji and the British West Indies to cut sugarcane, not because the British were lefties.

    To the contrary, what you have described constitutes being “lefties”.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    If the British Empire of a century ago is unquestionably leftist to you then you must be a Tsarist or something. So, either you're being lose with your terms or you know this song by heart:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UyxcRNyJVXU
  56. One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true. The narrative is something like, well, yes, we are trying to flood you with immigrants. But we aren’t doing it to destroy White civilization per se. We are doing it because of our insecurities and history of persecution and are merely destroying White civilization incidentally.

    As if it matters whether it’s the goal or just a by-product of the pursuit of another goal.

    • Replies: @Forbes

    As if it matters whether it’s the goal or just a by-product of the pursuit of another goal.
     
    Well if it's a by-product, a derivative of the intended goal, then it can be claimed the outcome was an unforeseen consequence.

    "So sorry about that, our intentions were good and honorable and transparent, but that consequence was not foreseen."
  57. @Desiderius
    He meant to say "isn't being left-wing."

    Though it is certainly still up for debate whether the free movement of peoples is left-wing or not. It was the Commintern after all. Stalin only went nationalist because he had to.

    Though it is certainly still up for debate whether the free movement of peoples is left-wing or not.

    Up for debate? How could it possibly be anything other than left-wing?

  58. Anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rosie

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true.
     
    Have you seen this one?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/11/anti-semitism-inherent-trumps-nativism/574672/

    The circumstances today, however, are vastly different. One reason hateful nativism so easily morphs into anti-Semitism in the Trump era is that today Jews really do disproportionately support immigration. The major American Jewish organizations overwhelmingly oppose Trump’s immigration policies. So do rank-and-file American Jews, according to several polls. Among whites, Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the civil-rights movement, too.

    The segregationist anti-Semites of the mid-20th century and the nativist anti-Semites of today are wrong about Jews’ motives. Jews didn’t support civil rights then—and they don’t support immigrants’ rights now—because they want to subjugate white Christians. They’re just predisposed—because of their understanding of Jewish history—to identify with outsiders and fear ethnically and religiously exclusive definitions of Americanism. But people who demonize African Americans or Latino and Muslim immigrants notice that predisposition, and it leads them to demonize Jews, too.
     
    Notice here again this peculiar belief on the part of Jews that it is perfectly acceptable to destroy the White race so long as it is, as you say, "incidental."

    I love his self-complimenting rationalization there, which of course, technically, doesn’t conflict with the premise he’s supposedly refuted: that activist Hebrews don’t hate goy society, they just really really like NAM peasants who will battle low-status non-pedigreed goyim in economic warfare. Yep, no signs of malice there *at all*.

    By his own facile terms it’s easy to retort that mobilized Judaica promotes wholesale society-wrecking immigration because it’s no skin off their back, or threat to their own clannish intra-group’s concerns, and is actually quite helpful to the ol’ wallet in some ways. Yahweh said let my people have cheap maids and gardeners.

  59. @Desiderius

    Few whites
     
    Doesn't take many. Jews themselves are only 2% of the population, and most of those are harmless conservative/Orthodox Jews.

    Doesn’t take many. Jews themselves are only 2% of the population, and most of those are harmless conservative/Orthodox Jews.

    LOL. You can’t be serious.

    First, 2% is more than sufficient. Two percent (or three percent at the time) was enough to own the whole damn national media for decades. You should understand, though for some reason you can’t, that 200 million white Americans were thereby indoctrinated to act in a way that convinces you that they are part of the problem. THEY’RE NOT. There are some collaborators, but the anti-white project is a Jewish project.

    Second, harmless conservative Jews? What? Conservative Jews, in general, are a crucial part of the organized Jewish community.

    • Replies: @Whiskey
    You can't sell sand in the Sahara. Regardless of whatever roles Jews play in media anti White male hate, open borders and mass third world migration are bought by the vast majority of voters and power centers. The judiciary, university, media. All love it.

    The greatest salesman can't sell garbage. People want open borders the end of Western civilization and anti White male hatred. Look at Oprah. That is what America wants
    , @Desiderius
    You're an idiot, this link is for others reading along:

    "These are the high spots of organized U.S. Protestantism's super-protestant new program for a just and durable peace after World War II:

    >Ultimately, "a world government of delegated powers."
    >Complete abandonment of U.S. isolationism.
    >Strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty.
    >International control of all armies & navies.
    > "A universal system of money ... so planned as to prevent inflation and deflation."
    > Worldwide freedom of immigration.
    > Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade.
    > "Autonomy for all subject and colo nial peoples" (with much better treatment for Negroes... "

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/time42.htm

    http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,801396,00.html

    https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/archive/American_Malvern.pdf

  60. Anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @Desiderius
    He meant to say "isn't being left-wing."

    Though it is certainly still up for debate whether the free movement of peoples is left-wing or not. It was the Commintern after all. Stalin only went nationalist because he had to.

    Comintern = Commie International (though ended up interning a lot of folks in practice)

    I thought you were going to point out Marx’s criticism of coolie labor which appears in The Communist Manifesto among other writings. By contrast, much of the current “free movement of peoples” pabulum spews from opportunistic nationalists (well, nationalists on behalf of another nation than the one they’re exploiting)

  61. @ben tillman
    They do in South Carolina.

    The South has always bloc voted.

  62. Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?

    Economist writers only consume soy.

  63. @ben tillman

    Doesn’t take many. Jews themselves are only 2% of the population, and most of those are harmless conservative/Orthodox Jews.
     
    LOL. You can't be serious.

    First, 2% is more than sufficient. Two percent (or three percent at the time) was enough to own the whole damn national media for decades. You should understand, though for some reason you can't, that 200 million white Americans were thereby indoctrinated to act in a way that convinces you that they are part of the problem. THEY'RE NOT. There are some collaborators, but the anti-white project is a Jewish project.

    Second, harmless conservative Jews? What? Conservative Jews, in general, are a crucial part of the organized Jewish community.

    You can’t sell sand in the Sahara. Regardless of whatever roles Jews play in media anti White male hate, open borders and mass third world migration are bought by the vast majority of voters and power centers. The judiciary, university, media. All love it.

    The greatest salesman can’t sell garbage. People want open borders the end of Western civilization and anti White male hatred. Look at Oprah. That is what America wants

    • Replies: @27 year old
    I never realized it before but Tiny Duck is actually Whiskey.
    , @ben tillman

    You can’t sell sand in the Sahara. Regardless of whatever roles Jews play in media anti White male hate, open borders and mass third world migration are bought by the vast majority of voters and power centers. The judiciary, university, media. All love it.

    The greatest salesman can’t sell garbage.
     
    It's not sold.
  64. It has become fashionable for ostensibly conservative commentators to call into question and delegitimize identity politics. Your racial or ethnic idenity is just what you were born with, and is fundmentally unimporant.

    Come again? How is such an idea even remotely “conservative”? Who you are, where you came from, and who your people are would seem to be something very important to anyone genuinely bearing the description “conservative”. And it certainly is important to any number of other groups. Blacks seem to consider it pretty important that they are black. Jews consider it pretty important that they are Jews. Feminists consider it pretty important that they are women. So why shouldn’t whites deem their whiteness to be pretty important?

    • Replies: @Forbes

    It has become fashionable for ostensibly conservative commentators to call into question and delegitimize identity politics.
     
    It's the preemptive rebuttal to charges of racism: "I don't see race, I see a person--I'm color-blind to race." And since Democrats instinctively adopt identity politics, the putative conservative must reject identity politics.

    This attitude is also an adoption of MLK's as laid out in his 1963 "I have a dream" speech--where the content of one's character is more important than the color of one's skin (paraphrasing).

    The putative conservative, apparently, hasn't noticed that the Democratic Party and every special-interest identity group has rejected MLK's dream, in favor of set-asides for those identity groups.

    What's new, starting in 2016, was the purported horror that Whites might be acting as an identity group--hence, all the hectoring about white supremacy, white nationalism, white privilege, etc., as if everyone except Whites could so coalesce...

  65. @ben tillman

    Doesn’t take many. Jews themselves are only 2% of the population, and most of those are harmless conservative/Orthodox Jews.
     
    LOL. You can't be serious.

    First, 2% is more than sufficient. Two percent (or three percent at the time) was enough to own the whole damn national media for decades. You should understand, though for some reason you can't, that 200 million white Americans were thereby indoctrinated to act in a way that convinces you that they are part of the problem. THEY'RE NOT. There are some collaborators, but the anti-white project is a Jewish project.

    Second, harmless conservative Jews? What? Conservative Jews, in general, are a crucial part of the organized Jewish community.

    You’re an idiot, this link is for others reading along:

    “These are the high spots of organized U.S. Protestantism’s super-protestant new program for a just and durable peace after World War II:

    >Ultimately, “a world government of delegated powers.”
    >Complete abandonment of U.S. isolationism.
    >Strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty.
    >International control of all armies & navies.
    > “A universal system of money … so planned as to prevent inflation and deflation.”
    > Worldwide freedom of immigration.
    > Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade.
    > “Autonomy for all subject and colo nial peoples” (with much better treatment for Negroes… ”

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/time42.htm

    http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,801396,00.html

    https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/archive/American_Malvern.pdf

    • Replies: @Svigor
    Throw in a qanon link while you're at it, eh?
    , @notanon
    i come from that "east anglian puritan" type ancestry so i completely agree there is an universalist, egalitarian, messianic aspect to it which is very dangerous if harnessed to a bad ideology like globohomo

    however that ancestry is only attached to globohomo cos they were conned by the blank slate ideology

    the same ancestry combined with acceptance of genetic reality would have a completely different outcome (no doubt equally arrogant and morally superior but different)

    nb your link on John Foster Dulles

    chairman of the Federal Council of Churches' Commission on a Just and Durable Peace and John Foster Dulles chaired the conference in question
     

    married into Rockefeller family
     
    , @ben tillman
    None of that is even responsive. Those links are perfectly consistent with everything I've ever said. In fact, that's a perfect ilustration of my point.

    You are insanely wrong about this stuff, and -- FYI -- you're a cultist. Think about it. Oh, that's right -- you can't. Your brain is occupied territory.

  66. @anon
    The Economist took a hard left turn after it was bought by a Rothschild. They used to have a comments section after every article that was very active, and in almost every article readers expressed vastly different views than the editorials, and these commies shut it down. I used to subscribe and read it cover to cover. Since 2016 I no longer even bothered visiting the website.

    It's time for them to rename themselves The Globalist. This third rate rag has never met an immigrant they don't love. Everyday is hug an immigrant day and every other day is hug a Muslim day at TE. And if they're not obsessing over immigration, they're obsessing over sex, especially over gays and transgenders. Once again the chosen have turned a once great magazine into shite, like they do everything else.

    I read it every week cover to cover for twenty five years. I can’t stand to look at it now. I wonder what their readership stats are saying. This view seems to be so widespread that it must be showing up in their sales. Maybe they’ve decided good riddance to middle aged white men – their readership is booming among Indian data scientists or something.

  67. @anon
    It's obvious. Jews support mass immigration from the third world so they won't be the only group of outsiders in America. Teaming up with blacks wasn't enough because whites still vastly outnumbered both groups.

    But WASP elites do their part. The Seattle area is drowning in Chinese and Indians, and their anchor babies are taking over our schools. The #1 importer of all this diversity? Bill Gates. They're all his H1B code coolies, either directly employed by Microsoft or indirectly through an outsourcing firm like Infosys.

    I'm thankful Amazon is establishing HQ2 and HQ3 somewhere else, possibly Dallas and Northern Virginia. Just wish Microsoft would do the same and move the hell somewhere else, preferably to CA, that state is already ruined, no need to go ruin another Red state. WA used to be solidly red, until Gates turned it blue with his tech plantation and multi-culti army.

    Something really weird is going on in Gates’ brain. Is he not noticing any of this stuff?

  68. @AndrewR
    Do they in South Africa?

    Do they in South Africa?

    Yes – most whites vote Democratic Alliance.

  69. The Economist is a science experiment demonstrative of the success of the postmodernist’s long march through the institutions.

  70. Waiting for the Economist to put it bluntly,”CRUSH THE REBELS IN AMERICA ONCE AND FOR ALL”.

  71. @Hank Archer
    If you assume that someone who looks Black, Hispanic or Asian will vote Democrat you will be right 75%+ of the time. For Caucasians it's much closer to 50-50.

    Such open-mindedness is doing wonders for South Africa.

  72. @ben tillman

    The Economist is being left-wing when it promotes the free flow of cheap labour around the world; they’re being good British liberals. Indian labourers were brought on steamships to Fiji and the British West Indies to cut sugarcane, not because the British were lefties.
     
    To the contrary, what you have described constitutes being "lefties".

    If the British Empire of a century ago is unquestionably leftist to you then you must be a Tsarist or something. So, either you’re being lose with your terms or you know this song by heart:

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    You admitted I'm right. Empire = Left.
  73. “In the end, when all additive errors cancel, identity=politics.”

    Yes, Karl Marx didn’t get it exactly right.

    “The history of all hitherto existing monoethnic society is the history of class struggles.”

    But Disraeli did.

    “All is race; there is no other truth”

  74. Economist: GOP “Increasingly Unified Around Whiteness”

    That would sure as hell would be a step in the right direction.

  75. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time

    You mean you’re still wasting your money on that shit???

  76. @Anonymous

    Worried about the damage that a Democratic wave in the mid-terms could wreak, Mr Trump has fed his base an artery-clogging diet of red meat.
     
    Reminds me of this recent Tweet from some twerp at Vox:

    https://twitter.com/drvox/status/1058473742207115264

    Obviously written by a lib from one of our large shit hole cities.

    He sounds jealous to me.

  77. Anonymous[346] • Disclaimer says:
    @The preferred nomenclature is...
    Speaking of slanted news. Is it just me or has Drudge moved more to the Left the last 18 months or so. For example, he sure has been touting all those fake polls showing Dems up by wide margins. It is subtle but it's there. I've been following him from almost the beginning of his site (just like I've followed Mr. Sailer) and I don't think I am wrong in my analysis of his leftward tilt.

    Speaking of slanted news. Is it just me or has Drudge moved more to the Left the last 18 months or so. For example, he sure has been touting all those fake polls showing Dems up by wide margins. It is subtle but it’s there. I’ve been following him from almost the beginning of his site (just like I’ve followed Mr. Sailer) and I don’t think I am wrong in my analysis of his leftward tilt.

    Yeah, the DrudgeReport is now pretty much in line with MSM in general. I noticed the shift about a year ago or so as well. I mentioned this to family members who support Trump and they agreed and had stopped going there. I have also seen posts on FreeRepublic about Drudge’s new left slant and all the replies agreed. It had to have happened after the election because Trump was praising Drudge during his election rallies two-plus years ago.

    • Replies: @The preferred nomenclature is...
    Well he is a Jew and I presume a homosexual so it was only a matter of time I suppose.

    I know my visits to his site have dropped considerably and when I do go there it is usually not for long.
    , @Forbes
    Good observation. I stopped looking at Drudge some time ago--I used to check it every day for headlines, but no longer. 18 months sounds about right.
  78. @anon
    The Economist took a hard left turn after it was bought by a Rothschild. They used to have a comments section after every article that was very active, and in almost every article readers expressed vastly different views than the editorials, and these commies shut it down. I used to subscribe and read it cover to cover. Since 2016 I no longer even bothered visiting the website.

    It's time for them to rename themselves The Globalist. This third rate rag has never met an immigrant they don't love. Everyday is hug an immigrant day and every other day is hug a Muslim day at TE. And if they're not obsessing over immigration, they're obsessing over sex, especially over gays and transgenders. Once again the chosen have turned a once great magazine into shite, like they do everything else.

    The comments section was very good. Then one day, without any warning or explanation, it was suddenly gone.

  79. We live in a degenerated and degenerate technocracy and the Economist is the in-flight magazine to read while we corkscrew into the ground.

    I’ve said many times before that our system is a degenerated technocracy but, until now, I was never able to offer conclusive proof. Here is is below. They can do this but they can’t figure out if mass immigration by Islamists to Europe is dangerous, even after the third dozen attacks?

  80. @Whiskey
    You can't sell sand in the Sahara. Regardless of whatever roles Jews play in media anti White male hate, open borders and mass third world migration are bought by the vast majority of voters and power centers. The judiciary, university, media. All love it.

    The greatest salesman can't sell garbage. People want open borders the end of Western civilization and anti White male hatred. Look at Oprah. That is what America wants

    I never realized it before but Tiny Duck is actually Whiskey.

  81. OT:
    Paul Krugman has a series of tweets on how the gross White guys of America are a lot like the ones in the former East Germany who just don’t get how amazing Merkel has been.

    Countries don’t have economies, economies have countries. Some people just need to die off if they’re not needed in Prof Krugman’s pink collar, “knowledge” economy. Sorry guys (not really)!

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    I'll just add that the article on the lost men of the former East Germany really reeks of misandry.
  82. @Desiderius
    You're an idiot, this link is for others reading along:

    "These are the high spots of organized U.S. Protestantism's super-protestant new program for a just and durable peace after World War II:

    >Ultimately, "a world government of delegated powers."
    >Complete abandonment of U.S. isolationism.
    >Strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty.
    >International control of all armies & navies.
    > "A universal system of money ... so planned as to prevent inflation and deflation."
    > Worldwide freedom of immigration.
    > Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade.
    > "Autonomy for all subject and colo nial peoples" (with much better treatment for Negroes... "

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/time42.htm

    http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,801396,00.html

    https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/archive/American_Malvern.pdf

    Throw in a qanon link while you’re at it, eh?

  83. @Rosie

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true.
     
    Have you seen this one?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/11/anti-semitism-inherent-trumps-nativism/574672/

    The circumstances today, however, are vastly different. One reason hateful nativism so easily morphs into anti-Semitism in the Trump era is that today Jews really do disproportionately support immigration. The major American Jewish organizations overwhelmingly oppose Trump’s immigration policies. So do rank-and-file American Jews, according to several polls. Among whites, Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the civil-rights movement, too.

    The segregationist anti-Semites of the mid-20th century and the nativist anti-Semites of today are wrong about Jews’ motives. Jews didn’t support civil rights then—and they don’t support immigrants’ rights now—because they want to subjugate white Christians. They’re just predisposed—because of their understanding of Jewish history—to identify with outsiders and fear ethnically and religiously exclusive definitions of Americanism. But people who demonize African Americans or Latino and Muslim immigrants notice that predisposition, and it leads them to demonize Jews, too.
     
    Notice here again this peculiar belief on the part of Jews that it is perfectly acceptable to destroy the White race so long as it is, as you say, "incidental."

    Another one from NYT’s Bari Weiss:

    This idea that they are a constitutionally welcoming people would be a lot more plausible if they had eagerly welcomed those 40,000 African migrants that showed up in Israel instead of trying to dump them on Europe.

  84. The Republican Party is increasingly unified around whiteness

    While the Democratic Party is increasingly unified around anti-whiteness which, for some reason, is apparently perfectly acceptable in today’s world. I guess the message is just say no to hate unless it is anti-white hate in which case you should embrace it with both arms.

  85. @Cagey Beast
    OT:
    Paul Krugman has a series of tweets on how the gross White guys of America are a lot like the ones in the former East Germany who just don't get how amazing Merkel has been.

    Countries don't have economies, economies have countries. Some people just need to die off if they're not needed in Prof Krugman's pink collar, "knowledge" economy. Sorry guys (not really)!
    https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1059780385192767488

    I’ll just add that the article on the lost men of the former East Germany really reeks of misandry.

  86. @Thirdtwin
    "...artery-clogging diet of red meat."

    "Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?"

    Yes. Although the Dems still believe red meat leads to seizures...

    "The president has also seized on the useful image of a caravan.."

    artery-clogging diet of red meat.

    Isn’t this cliche out of date scientifically?

    Depends if it is grass fed or not.

  87. @AndrewR
    The role that The Economist has envisioned for whites is one of a deeply hated, highly productive, highly taxed minority. Not that they have great plans for any group of goyim, but the whites are going to get it the hardest. At least that's their plan.

    The role that The Economist has envisioned for whites is one of a deeply hated, highly productive, highly taxed minority.

    Excellent comment, and descriptive of every office environment I’ve seen or heard of.

    Shut up, keep the machines running, don’t complain, and “give back” half your paycheck to all those not as privileged as you.

  88. An easier way to look at the GOP and Democratic Party is to realize one is the assimilated party and the other is the unassimilated.

  89. @Anonymous

    Speaking of slanted news. Is it just me or has Drudge moved more to the Left the last 18 months or so. For example, he sure has been touting all those fake polls showing Dems up by wide margins. It is subtle but it’s there. I’ve been following him from almost the beginning of his site (just like I’ve followed Mr. Sailer) and I don’t think I am wrong in my analysis of his leftward tilt.
     
    Yeah, the DrudgeReport is now pretty much in line with MSM in general. I noticed the shift about a year ago or so as well. I mentioned this to family members who support Trump and they agreed and had stopped going there. I have also seen posts on FreeRepublic about Drudge’s new left slant and all the replies agreed. It had to have happened after the election because Trump was praising Drudge during his election rallies two-plus years ago.

    Well he is a Jew and I presume a homosexual so it was only a matter of time I suppose.

    I know my visits to his site have dropped considerably and when I do go there it is usually not for long.

  90. Though people with high scores on white identity are hostile to immigration, they are also strong supporters of Social Security (federal pensions) and Medicare, the government health-insurance programme for the elderly. Unlike means-tested programmes, such as cash welfare or food stamps, these schemes are seen as benefiting white Americans after a life of hard work. Mr Trump broke with Republican orthodoxy when he promised no cuts in the programmes, while also driving a hard line against immigration of all kinds.

    Trumpy wanted to win Florida, so he said no cuts to Social Security nor Medicare, simple as that.

    Trumpy also said he would protect Social Security and Medicare. Trumpy just outflanked the GOP politician whores and went about his business of winning the nomination and the presidency.

    Tweet from 2015:

  91. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    They moved left sometime ago, although they held out a lot longer than American newsmagazines did. Read an article a few years back where they were completely dumbfounded about why the black students were not doing anywhere near as well academically as Europeans and Asian students in South Africa. Of course it was still the fault of Afrikaners.

  92. Anon[126] • Disclaimer says:

    “Reminds me of this recent Tweet from some twerp at Vox.”

    Well, well. Now that you mention it, YouTube has just been caught in a scheme to funnel Vox $20 million dollars to make “educational” videos for them. Hint: Vox, like most of these Leftist companies, don’t make money, so they get subsidized by the government through tax policy, corporations, and leftist billionaires. You guys should really look into the finances of Vox, Buzzfeed, the WaPo and the like. It’s almost like they are state propaganda.

  93. @Desiderius
    You're an idiot, this link is for others reading along:

    "These are the high spots of organized U.S. Protestantism's super-protestant new program for a just and durable peace after World War II:

    >Ultimately, "a world government of delegated powers."
    >Complete abandonment of U.S. isolationism.
    >Strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty.
    >International control of all armies & navies.
    > "A universal system of money ... so planned as to prevent inflation and deflation."
    > Worldwide freedom of immigration.
    > Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade.
    > "Autonomy for all subject and colo nial peoples" (with much better treatment for Negroes... "

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/time42.htm

    http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,801396,00.html

    https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/archive/American_Malvern.pdf

    i come from that “east anglian puritan” type ancestry so i completely agree there is an universalist, egalitarian, messianic aspect to it which is very dangerous if harnessed to a bad ideology like globohomo

    however that ancestry is only attached to globohomo cos they were conned by the blank slate ideology

    the same ancestry combined with acceptance of genetic reality would have a completely different outcome (no doubt equally arrogant and morally superior but different)

    nb your link on John Foster Dulles

    chairman of the Federal Council of Churches’ Commission on a Just and Durable Peace and John Foster Dulles chaired the conference in question

    married into Rockefeller family

  94. Anon[433] • Disclaimer says:

    I don’t see how anyone could say with a straight face that the democrat party is united by anything other than racist hatred for whites at this point. And to a lesser degree, men. The proof can be found in various polling data. Blacks and Hispanics, for example, tend to share many of the same social beliefs of conservative white republicans. They even share some of the same economic beliefs like restricting immigration and being skeptical of free trade. However, those two groups overwhelmingly vote democrat in every election. Therefore, policy – and even ideology – cannot fully explain their voting patterns (the same with Jews and Asians). Anti-white animus would seem to be the obvious take away here.

    Otherwise, these groups should be much more supportive of republicans: Trump has slapped tariffs on foreign nations dumping junk into our country; Trump demands a renegotiation of NAFTA (something Obama lied about); wage growth is good; Trump solved the North Korean nuclear crisis; Trump has refused to sign the TPP, something that would have been devastating for poor minorities; the job market is better than it was; Trump opposes immigration that hurts poor blacks and Hispanics; he opposes the affirmative action policies that harm high-achieving Asians; and he’s been good to Jews by supporting Israel…..so, why the hell aren’t these groups supporting him? Answer: these groups aren’t voting based on reason and logic but on pure tribal affinity and racial hatred for whites. This could be the time when the mask finally falls off the face of “US Democracy”, exposing it as nothing but warring tribes of people who hate each other. The elephant in the room is, “what comes next?”

    The controlled media says that it’s the whites who are racially unifying and being racist. Well, perhaps…but why? Perhaps they could ask if the continual stream of racism from the other side has something to do with it.

  95. Anon[805] • Disclaimer says:

    Here is how Jeff Bezos’s Washington Post frames it:

    “Trump stokes resentment toward minorities. Republicans just smile.”

    That’s funny. You’d think that outfits like the Washington Post have been stoking racial resentment against whites considering the thousands of articles they’ve collectively published with their friends about “white supremacy, white privilege, whiteness, the Patriarchy, get Becky, BLM, and justifying Confederate statue attacks” – between the times when they aren’t attacking Kanye West for being a race traitor Uncle Tom. The controlled media even have geniuses like Jennifer Rubin, Brett Stephens, and Max Boot on board who openly fantasize about deporting whites and packing the Supreme Court. Genius ex-Hollywood lawyer and foreign policy extraordinaire Jennifer “bomb Iran” Rubin even once appeared on MSNBC to encourage mobs of people to harass Sarah Huckabee for life. My, what tolerant people these Washington Post types are; the farthest thing away from hypocritical bald-faced liars. What integrity.

  96. …and let’s all play today’s segment of ‘Guess the Race.’

    ‘______ Named People’s Sexiest Man Alive’

    Everybody gets a prize.

  97. @Desiderius
    He meant to say "isn't being left-wing."

    Though it is certainly still up for debate whether the free movement of peoples is left-wing or not. It was the Commintern after all. Stalin only went nationalist because he had to.

    Thanks for catching my typo.

    Yes, you’re right about Stalin as well.

  98. @Flip
    The Economist has moved increasingly to the left and is much less objective. I might not renew next time.

    I dropped the NYT in 2000, even as I knew they were left-liberal to begin with, but their hectoring about what to think became oppressive and unbearable.

    I dropped The Economist long before that. A conservative (in temperament), though classically liberal (ordered liberty with limited government) in politics, that yielding to progressive-left (top-down, one-size-fits-all) partisanship is simply an about-face in substance.

    They made their choice–I made my choice.

  99. @notanon
    big business pretending to believe in SJW identity politics out of a desire for open borders for cheap labor is one of the critical factors to understand in modern politics.

    “big business pretending to believe in SJW identity politics out of a desire for open borders for cheap labor is one of the critical factors to understand in modern politics.”
    Ain’t that the truth. Just look at the ads big coproporations are putting out these days; vast overrepsresntation of non-whites. especially blacks, with many ads blantantly anti-white. You’d never guess blacks are only 13% of the population and that the purchasing power of whites, both by median income and sheer numbers, vastly outstrips them.

  100. @Reg Cæsar
    Whatever happened to "white sales"? Didn't they use to take place on Washington's birthday?

    The “white sale” at Bloomingdale’s and Macy’s still occur in January, or did, IIRC.

    Sheets and towels on sale–maybe they’ve all converted to the “bed & bath sale.”

  101. @syonredux

    There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters that their status as top dogs is threatened, which binds the Trumpian Republican Party together.
     
    Hatred of White, Christian, Cis-Het men doesn't count?

    There is no single cause which unifies the Democratic Party like the sense among some white voters

    One marvels at the equivalence between the Democratic Party and some white voters. Apparently, the status of some binds the Trumpian Republican Party together, while it’s a mystery the Democratic Party doesn’t disappear for lack of unifying cause…

  102. @notanon
    big business pretending to believe in SJW identity politics out of a desire for open borders for cheap labor is one of the critical factors to understand in modern politics.

    But are they pretending? How could you know? Does the outcome make any difference if they are pretending?

  103. @Anonymous

    Speaking of slanted news. Is it just me or has Drudge moved more to the Left the last 18 months or so. For example, he sure has been touting all those fake polls showing Dems up by wide margins. It is subtle but it’s there. I’ve been following him from almost the beginning of his site (just like I’ve followed Mr. Sailer) and I don’t think I am wrong in my analysis of his leftward tilt.
     
    Yeah, the DrudgeReport is now pretty much in line with MSM in general. I noticed the shift about a year ago or so as well. I mentioned this to family members who support Trump and they agreed and had stopped going there. I have also seen posts on FreeRepublic about Drudge’s new left slant and all the replies agreed. It had to have happened after the election because Trump was praising Drudge during his election rallies two-plus years ago.

    Good observation. I stopped looking at Drudge some time ago–I used to check it every day for headlines, but no longer. 18 months sounds about right.

  104. @ben tillman

    One odd thing has been how several Jews have recently more or less admitted that a lot of the “conspiracies” are factually true. The narrative is something like, well, yes, we are trying to flood you with immigrants. But we aren’t doing it to destroy White civilization per se. We are doing it because of our insecurities and history of persecution and are merely destroying White civilization incidentally.
     
    As if it matters whether it's the goal or just a by-product of the pursuit of another goal.

    As if it matters whether it’s the goal or just a by-product of the pursuit of another goal.

    Well if it’s a by-product, a derivative of the intended goal, then it can be claimed the outcome was an unforeseen consequence.

    “So sorry about that, our intentions were good and honorable and transparent, but that consequence was not foreseen.”

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    So what?
  105. @Neil Templeton
    Not so good for you. Not only would you be stymied as your brain obsessively computed all potential anagrams of "white courtesy phone" and "black courtesy phone", but you would also have to estimate the probability that the hostess might have maliciously conflated white with black, and the probability that she had singled out you, of all airport patrons, to demonstrate the structural racism of the airport identification of telephones, and (hopefully, finally) the probability that other airporters would believe you if you demonstrated that the phones were black, and always had been, and were never intended to be white, not even for a moment.

    Gosh. That must be why they work at NASA.

  106. @Mr. Anon
    It has become fashionable for ostensibly conservative commentators to call into question and delegitimize identity politics. Your racial or ethnic idenity is just what you were born with, and is fundmentally unimporant.

    Come again? How is such an idea even remotely "conservative"? Who you are, where you came from, and who your people are would seem to be something very important to anyone genuinely bearing the description "conservative". And it certainly is important to any number of other groups. Blacks seem to consider it pretty important that they are black. Jews consider it pretty important that they are Jews. Feminists consider it pretty important that they are women. So why shouldn't whites deem their whiteness to be pretty important?

    It has become fashionable for ostensibly conservative commentators to call into question and delegitimize identity politics.

    It’s the preemptive rebuttal to charges of racism: “I don’t see race, I see a person–I’m color-blind to race.” And since Democrats instinctively adopt identity politics, the putative conservative must reject identity politics.

    This attitude is also an adoption of MLK’s as laid out in his 1963 “I have a dream” speech–where the content of one’s character is more important than the color of one’s skin (paraphrasing).

    The putative conservative, apparently, hasn’t noticed that the Democratic Party and every special-interest identity group has rejected MLK’s dream, in favor of set-asides for those identity groups.

    What’s new, starting in 2016, was the purported horror that Whites might be acting as an identity group–hence, all the hectoring about white supremacy, white nationalism, white privilege, etc., as if everyone except Whites could so coalesce…

  107. GOP “Increasingly Unified Around Whiteness”.

    If only.

    In 2012, 90% of Romney votes came from Whites.
    In 2016 87% of Trump votes came from Whites.

    And all of them, Trump included, are in terror of telling the truth.

    Without White America, the mewling GOP really would become the emasculated empty shell that it is.

    And truth be told, were he and they to grab their primary sex organs and tell that truth, how many Whites could tolerate being called “racist”?

    Sentimental moralism, the mark of the Enlightenment’s triumph over Christendom, is our race’s shameful and lethal cancer of the soul.

  108. @Anonymous

    Worried about the damage that a Democratic wave in the mid-terms could wreak, Mr Trump has fed his base an artery-clogging diet of red meat.
     
    Reminds me of this recent Tweet from some twerp at Vox:

    https://twitter.com/drvox/status/1058473742207115264

    Suburban Americans = bad character traits
    Somalis and mexicans = good character traits

    How anyone can look at the environments these groups produce and honestly believe this stuff I don’t know. I dont think I can be convinced ALL of these people are signaling for personal advancement. Some have to seriously believe this crap.

  109. @Reg Cæsar
    Whatever happened to "white sales"? Didn't they use to take place on Washington's birthday?

    The white sales had to end because all the whites were sold out.

  110. @Forbes

    As if it matters whether it’s the goal or just a by-product of the pursuit of another goal.
     
    Well if it's a by-product, a derivative of the intended goal, then it can be claimed the outcome was an unforeseen consequence.

    "So sorry about that, our intentions were good and honorable and transparent, but that consequence was not foreseen."

    So what?

  111. @Cagey Beast
    If the British Empire of a century ago is unquestionably leftist to you then you must be a Tsarist or something. So, either you're being lose with your terms or you know this song by heart:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UyxcRNyJVXU

    You admitted I’m right. Empire = Left.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Britain since 1688 has been a de facto commercial republic where church, monarchy and tradition were little more than shop-window props.
  112. @Whiskey
    You can't sell sand in the Sahara. Regardless of whatever roles Jews play in media anti White male hate, open borders and mass third world migration are bought by the vast majority of voters and power centers. The judiciary, university, media. All love it.

    The greatest salesman can't sell garbage. People want open borders the end of Western civilization and anti White male hatred. Look at Oprah. That is what America wants

    You can’t sell sand in the Sahara. Regardless of whatever roles Jews play in media anti White male hate, open borders and mass third world migration are bought by the vast majority of voters and power centers. The judiciary, university, media. All love it.

    The greatest salesman can’t sell garbage.

    It’s not sold.

  113. @Desiderius
    You're an idiot, this link is for others reading along:

    "These are the high spots of organized U.S. Protestantism's super-protestant new program for a just and durable peace after World War II:

    >Ultimately, "a world government of delegated powers."
    >Complete abandonment of U.S. isolationism.
    >Strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty.
    >International control of all armies & navies.
    > "A universal system of money ... so planned as to prevent inflation and deflation."
    > Worldwide freedom of immigration.
    > Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade.
    > "Autonomy for all subject and colo nial peoples" (with much better treatment for Negroes... "

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/time42.htm

    http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,801396,00.html

    https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/archive/American_Malvern.pdf

    None of that is even responsive. Those links are perfectly consistent with everything I’ve ever said. In fact, that’s a perfect ilustration of my point.

    You are insanely wrong about this stuff, and — FYI — you’re a cultist. Think about it. Oh, that’s right — you can’t. Your brain is occupied territory.

  114. @ben tillman
    You admitted I'm right. Empire = Left.

    Britain since 1688 has been a de facto commercial republic where church, monarchy and tradition were little more than shop-window props.

    • Agree: ben tillman

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.