The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Democrats: Americans Don't Deserve a Wall
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Wall is bad either because it won’t work or because it will work.

But these contradictory rationalizations are motivated by the heartfelt sentiment that Americans don’t deserve a Wall. You Americans being allowed a say into who gets into your country next would be like Motel 6 guests getting to veto future guests in their rooms. Just move along, transients …

 
Hide 364 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Stick says:

    Per Jonah Goldberg, America is an idea not a real meat and bones nation. Maybe Trump can deliver the beef instead of delivering the New World Order Wankerism that defined the 28 shite cyclone of Bush, Clinton Dynasties with a primitive interlude featuring Obama.

  2. Trevor H. says:

    Why are Democrats furiously trying to replace what’s left of the white race in America? Do they not have confidence that the task is essentially complete already?

    What’s it going to take to convince them? They don’t want to hear a single peep out of any of us. Aren’t we there yet? I don’t think too many of them read iSteve…..it’s that orange man isn’t it. Gives them the chills.

    • Replies: @Harold
    , @Tyrion 2
    , @Reg Cæsar
  3. PaceLaw says:

    It is a well stated belief of ALL Democrats that America should ALWAYS be open to everyone. After all, are not the words “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses” found somewhere within the Constitution?

  4. Anon[188] • Disclaimer says:

    In the Middle East, Jewish Zionists say “We deserve a wall against Palestinians, but Palestinians don’t deserve a wall against us Zionists. We can freely enter West Bank and take more land, but Palestinians in W. Bank can’t enter Israel to take over or do terror.” Which side is better off? Jews with right of walls or Palestinians with no right of walls?

    Do Jewish Americans regard whites as ‘the other Jews'(who deserve a wall) or ‘the other Palestinians'(who don’t deserve a wall)? Do Jews believe that Anglo-Texans, for example, have the right to remain dominant in Texas(like Jews in Israel) or do Jews believe Anglo-Texans should end up like Palestinians in West Bank(or in Palestine Proper in 1948, the year of Nakba), occupied and defeated? The answer is obvious. Jews see white Texans as the ‘other Palestinians’. However, Texas is run by cuckboys(than cowboys) who criminalize BDS and suck up to Zionists. The Jewish Plan for Anglo-Texans is same as Zionist Plan for Palestinians, but whites keep pretending they are the ‘other Jews’.

    In a way, Jews support massive non-white immigration-invasion as their own pro-wall policy. To Jews, a huge mass of non-whites amounts to a Human Wall or Barrier against White Power. Non-white masses are the electoral-economic moat around the globo-homo castle to keep out the white masses with pitchforks.

  5. Walls? What walls? We don’t need no stinking walls!

    Coming soon to you and your neighborhood: Open Concept Living.

    California, where everything is fine, characteristically leads the trend.


    Stacie McDonough, age 51, eats lunch by her tent in a homeless encampment near Los Angeles airport.

  6. @Stick

    Some alt-right wag (might have been Roissy?) once drily observed, If America is really only an idea, then let’s just write the idea down on a piece of paper and mail it to Mexico, Honduras, India, Africa, Pakistan and China. Then they can read it, and if they like the idea, they can re-constitute America in their own countries, no need to take all the trouble of coming here. Win-win!

  7. Going along with your Motel 6 analogy, the motel owner will at least wait until you’ve checked out. The ctrl-left/Globalist crowd has just been too impatient to wait until we check out. They’ve been doing their best, though, to expedite the check-out times of white Americans, like a motel owner having the housekeeping knock on the door time and again “housekeeping!” “We’re staying till eleven, ELEVEN, I said that 10 minutes ago!” “No comprende, Senor, I come clean room now…”

    • Replies: @415 reasons
  8. Pretty much.

    The truth is that “they” – Jews, Corporate America and deracinated Good Whites – are winning and, really if you look at birth demographics, have won. They’re turning what was an emerging nation (American whites were becoming a people, much like the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Britons slowly became one people) isn’t an economic zone with a boarding house filled with any and all.

    Trump has been fun, but he was mostly a rear guard action. There was no way that he could have done what was needed to save the country – stop all legal and illegal immigration and expel all illegal aliens. I’m not sure that even that would have saved the country, but it was our only chance.

    I have no idea what comes next. Worst case scenario would be war, though that still seems fanciful to me. (That said, while extremely unlikely, large-scale violence doesn’t seem impossible. Five years ago, I would have laughed at the idea and thought someone a childish nut for bringing it up, so things can change.) Best case scenario – as espoused by Mr. Unz – is that the country becomes a large California. Crumbling infrastructure, growing wealth disparities, but a place where whites are not openly discriminated against and can live relatively peacefully.

    (Actually, now that I think about it, the worst case scenario isn’t war, it’s South Africa. Whites are just killed off and don’t fight back.)

    I suppose that the real question is whether American (and European) whites will accept this fate. For now, it seems that we will. The examples of California, Texas, New Mexico and Florida show that whites seem fine with being displaced relatively peacefully. The example of South Africa shows that whites would rather be killed than called racist.

    If that’s the case, it’s hard to argue that we don’t deserve our fate. I’ll keep pushing in my little ways to get my fellow whites to wake up, but, for now, they seem quite happy to go gentle into that good night.

    • Agree: Daniel H
  9. @Buzz Mohawk

    These people wouldn’t last long like that with mosquitoes and chiggers around. You’ve got it pretty good over in Southern California, Steve.

  10. @Buzz Mohawk

    We’ve come a long way since the Dust Bowl days.


    Florence Thomson and children, photographed by Dorothea Lange

    • Replies: @Pericles
    , @Anon
    , @MBlanc46
  11. The biggest lie in Congress is when a member says they like to hear from the folks back home. Unless the folks back home say, “You are doing a great job. Keep doing what you are doing. I will always vote for you no matter what.” Anything else is unwelcome.

    And for Democrats, the sooner they can replace their constituents with low IQ serfs who will do what they are told without much fuss, the better. Accountability is something that no one enjoys but which everyone needs. Especially those in government.

    • Replies: @Hail
    , @J.Ross
  12. bjondo says:

    Americans Need This Wall

    The Wall should be made of Demos, Repubs ,
    fake opinion/news and Hollywood mouths,
    think tankers, bankers, corp CEO’s,
    foundation founders/execs, NGO heads.
    To start, Shumer, Pelosi, McConnell, Ryan.
    McCain’s bones topping instead of razor wire.

    5ds

  13. Harold says:
    @Trevor H.

    They don’t have a plan, they have a religion.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  14. But these contradictory rationalizations are motivated by the heartfelt sentiment that Americans don’t deserve a Wall.

    I assume you are being sarcastic there.

    Democrats know that they must prevent President Trump from fulfilling the one promise that resonates so strongly with most real Americans (as apposed to dual citizenship holders, if you get my drift) if they are to reduce his chances of re-election in 2020.

    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
  15. Don’t worry, Emma, we have plenty of vacancies…

  16. There are three reasons liberals and enthusiasts for the Democratic Party are so vehemently opposed to the wall, two rather prosaic and one a bit more esoteric. Cost and feasibility don’t register in the top three, IMO:

    1. Trump wants it; and since Orange Man Bad, the wall is bad. It was one of his main campaign promises, so they must defeat it to humiliate him.

    2. They oppose anything which stanches the flow of reliable Democratic voters. There’s also cheap labor lobby campaign loot in play, of course.

    3. (And this is the most esoteric) Having borders and keeping people out suggests that the “other” people on this planet are not as desirable as the people who are already here. When the people who are already here are over 60% white, one can accurately characterize that opposition to open borders as “white supremacy,” in the sense that yes, “we” prefer to be around “people like us.”

    That kind of thinking is abominable to a leftist. It’s why they flipped out over the “sh******” comment: They know it’s true and they hate themselves for noticing this fact themselves so they have to transfer it onto everyone else. Had Trump called Finland or Norway bad names, everyone would have chuckled and mocked it for a few days and that would have been the end of it because it’s obviously ridiculous.

    • Agree: Clyde
  17. RE “Democrats: Americans Don’t Deserve a Wall,” it’s not just Democrats, it’s the powerful of both parties. Don’t fool yourself; the R party, too, does not really want to limit immigration, legal or otherwise. Remember, it controlled both houses of Congress, plus the Executive Branch, until approximately yesterday.

    Keep in mind also that the bigger problem is legal immigration. Did we really see much action when ostensibly “our” party held “our” government?

    Over-immigration displaces Americans. The powers that be do not care.

    • Agree: Travis, Cloudbuster, RVBlake
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
  18. Dr. X says:

    The Wall is bad either because it won’t work or because it will work.

    But these contradictory rationalizations are motivated by the heartfelt sentiment that Americans don’t deserve a Wall.

    Only God’s Chosen People deserve a wall… paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

    • LOL: YetAnotherAnon
  19. JimB says:

    Republicans are the American Party. Democrats are the barbarian invader party. At some point Americans must decide that the political process is illegitimate and a new modus vivendi is required. We’re close to that point already with widespread voter fraud in heavily barbarian districts.

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    , @Bill Jones
  20. Ibound1 says:

    They really have no intention of allowing us to leave what we and our forefathers collectively built to our children. At some point one will have to ask oneself, “why am I building anything at all?”

  21. @Anon

    Pretty much. What’s more, they’ve won. Look at birth demographics. Throw in some immigration and the future for whites is clear.

    We’re not going to vote our way out of this.

    • Agree: Mr McKenna
  22. You Americans being allowed a say into who gets into your country next would be like Motel 6 guests getting to veto future guests in their rooms. Just move along, transients …

    I’ve long thought the respectable “conservative” view of the US, Canada, the UK, etc is that they’re just commercial real estate properties. From their point of view, our countries are commercial real estate and we legacy tenants can often be more of a headache than we’re worth. For legal reasons, they can’t evict us but they’re working on it.

    • Agree: CJ, MBlanc46
  23. @Stick

    Per Jonah Goldberg, America is an idea not a real meat and bones nation. Maybe Trump can deliver the beef instead of delivering the New World Order Wankerism that defined the 28 shite cyclone of Bush, Clinton Dynasties with a primitive interlude featuring Obama.

    The United States needs a political leader who will talk about the European Christian ancestral core of the USA. Red solo cup guy came up with White Core America or White Core American to get at the same thing by another way.

    David Hacker Fischer wrote the best book on the origins of the United States. Many of you know that DH Fischer once had kind words for the presidential candidacy of John McCain, but that momentary plunge into lunacy shouldn’t negate the great book Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways In America.

    Lindsey Graham says the United States is nothing but an idea. Trump should cut all ties with Lindsey Graham to make sure his voter base understands that Trump will stand up and fight for the historic American nation.

    Trump won’t cut all ties with Lindsey Graham, and that is why I am preparing to challenge Trumpy in the 2020 GOP presidential primary.

    Pewitt Immigration Promise and Pledge:

    IMMIGRATION MORATORIUM NOW!

    IMMEDIATE DEPORTATION OF ALL ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS!

  24. @PaceLaw

    It is a well stated belief of ALL Democrats that America should ALWAYS be open to everyone. After all, are not the words “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses” found somewhere within the Constitution?

    Imagine a fictional land far away, let’s call it The Republic of Jacksonia. It’s full of tired, poor and huddled People of Pallor (POPs) whose culture is very close to our own Scotch Irish of Appalachia and the rural South – in fact, our Southerners are not too distant descendants of destitute Jacksonian immigrants. In their social and political outlook, the Jacksonian immigrants are very close if not identical to their Appalachian and Southern cousins. Jacksonian immigration patterns however began with them settling in Appalachia and the South, but economic motives have seen them settling more frequently in Southern Illinois, Western Pennsylvania, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. These reliably “blue” States have seen their statewide elections for President and United States Senator getting closer, with Democrats still winning the majority of those races but with slimmer and slimmer margins despite the Democratic candidates moderating their positions and in many cases becoming quite conservative.

  25. Jack D says:
    @Anon

    The focus on Joos around here is insane (although not unusual – Nazis had the same obsession). There are 160,000 Jews in Texas, or .6% of the population. If .6% of the population can lead the remaining 99.4% around by the nose like cattle, you deserve your fate. And BTW, that .6% is not unanimously in favor of open borders. Trump got 28% of the Jewish vote – much higher among the Orthodox and among married Jewish men. If you keep focusing on the Joos as the source of your woes you will never get anywhere because the Joos are not the source of your woes. By focusing on them you make yourself appear like repellent Nazi clowns and repel people (both Jewish and non-Jewish) who might otherwise sympathize with your position. And since Joos have this wonderful magic mojo that enables a handful of them to mind control the rest of the population, you should be trying to get them on your side rather than making yourself repellent to them.

  26. @Stick

    Per Jonah Goldberg, America is an idea not a real meat and bones nation.

    Unfortunately, he’s exactly right, and too many people on the white nationalist bandwagon refuse to accept it. France is a nation-state, dominated by a coherent ethnic group. Russia is is a nation-state, dominated by a coherent ethnic group. Japan is a nation-state, dominated by a coherent ethnic group. Kurds are a coherent ethnic group, but not a nation. America is not dominated by a coherent ethnic group. “White people” is not an ethnicity. The majority of white Americans may be beginning to feel a common bond of being attacked for their skin color (but I don’t see much evidence even that is true), but they don’t share thousands of years of common traditions, ancestry and language.

    Trump is probably playing it smart in that he is not framing the wall in ethnic terms. He talks about “border security” and keeping out nebulous “terrorists and criminals.” He knows perfectly well that talking about keeping out people that will change the ethnic composition of the US is, even today, a political non-starter. Most white Americans don’t think in those terms. The percentage of white Americans who would tell their children not to marry someone of Mexican or Guatemalan ethnicity just on racial grounds is probably below 1%.

    The “race replacement” argument works in Hungary or even Germany. It’s a pointless argument in the US and will never gain traction.

  27. @Citizen of a Silly Country

    The examples of Mexico and Brazil show that white elites can live perfectly well in multi-racial countries, especially if they allow the occasional minority to marry in and add a “dash of color”.

    Seems to me America is headed that way. Towards becoming a nation of castes, rather than races. The elite is already producing a new race of people of mixed Jewish-East Asian-Northern European ancestry. That is what “meritocratic” Ivy League schools are for. Within 3 generations having pure white ancestry (or pure asian) will be a marker for backwardness. All the “cool” people will be interracial – Lin Manuel Miranda, George P. Bush, etc. Just wait until Ivanka and Jared’s daughter marries some half black/half Pakistani investment banker. Then the Trumps will have arrived and all will be forgiven.

    • Agree: fish
  28. @Jack D

    …you make yourself appear like repellent Nazi clowns…

    Remove the word, “Nazi,” and you might be right. That label is overused, as you know.

    …you should be trying to get them on your side…

    Since that side is the American side, they should already be on it. Many of them, such as you for example, are.

    …Joos have this wonderful magic mojo that enables a handful of them to mind control the rest of the population…

    CNN, NBC, FOX, New York Times, the Ivy League, the Congress, AIPAC, ADL, SPLC…

    “To whomever much is given, of him will much be required; and to whom much was entrusted, of him more will be asked.” –— Luke 12:35-48

    In the words of Bill Clinton, “I feel your pain.”

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
    , @Doug
  29. Alfa158 says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    I try to subtly push as well, and I notice that Whites are increasingly realizing what has happened, but as Richard Spencer once said, the demographic cake is already baked, the frog is boiled. Here in California the percentage of Whites is down in the 30’s and dropping. It’s a combination of having forgotten to have children, and people fleeing the state. I did a count of my closest friends, neighbors and relatives and the average fertility rate per couple came to 0.94 children. The discrimination is in actuality entirely open, it’s called affirmative action. People who just got here, never suffered discrimination and may in fact be financially better off than the average White get preferences based entirely on their race.
    For now California has been able to somewhat work as the tech economy, and the artificially inflated stock market have provided funding to keep the party going. However, that party is coming to an end. Technology manufacturing has long ago shifted overseas and the development is following. For now we are still benefiting from the brain drain of the brightest Asians escaping their countries to live and work here, but even that has had the negative side effect of their dimmer relatives flooding in with them.
    We’ll see how Brazilifornia holds up when the credit card bills start coming due, but I would take a guess that Brazil North is where the whole country is heading. I would not get any hopes up about Covington’s Northwest American Republic becoming reality.

  30. Hail says: • Website
    @Alfa158

    We’ll see how Brazilifornia holds up when the credit card bills start coming due

    Regardless of how it stumbles along — the bubble-people, the media and Hollywood You-Know-Whos, the many shifty immigrants of used-car-salesman caliber, and the great Mestizo masses — it won’t really be America.

    For all the big talk, as by Peter Akuleyev above (predicting a stable Jewish-NWEuropean-EAsian triracial elite for an as-is USA going forward), America is still defined by its ethnocultural core — as every single nation on Earth is.

  31. @Jack D

    If .6% of the population can lead the remaining 99.4% around by the nose like cattle, you deserve your fate.

    A sentiment shared by every corrupt, oppressive ruling class in the history of the world.

    that .6% is not unanimously in favor of open borders.

    But that 0.6% (2.2% nationwide), including you, is nearly unanimously opposed to anyone, ever, for any reason criticizing the Jews as a group.

    This is the the root cause of the ongoing destruction of America and every other European Christian nation. There is an ethnic pecking order, aka political correctness, that warps all discussion, and hence all policy.

    At the top are the Jews, about whom no bad can ever be spoken.

    In the middle are Blacks, Asians, Muslims and Amerinds, who can be criticized, but only with extreme respect and circumspection.

    At the bottom are European Christian peoples, including Americans, who must be criticized in the nastiest, most dishonest manner imaginable – for instance, the “white trash” stereotype so prevalent in entertainment.

    Shem, Japeth and Ham.

    Trump got 28% of the Jewish vote

    The only identifiable ethnic block among whom Trump did worse, rather than better, than McCain and Romney. And if Trump had run on a more consistently American-nationalist platform including a strictly non-interventionist foreign policy, like Buchanan did, how low would his percentage have been?

    Your comment betrays fathomless malice towards Americans. If we defend ourselves, you viscerally hate us as “repellent Nazi clowns”. If we do not defend ourselves, you viscerally hate us as “cattle”. But what never changes, no matter what we do, is your visceral hatred towards us.

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
  32. Anon[135] • Disclaimer says:

    OT

    Ron, how about making the “Recent Comments for This Writer” into their own pages? You could have a global recent comments page, and then recent comments pages for each writer, each linked to from its respective multi-post page, complete with Previous or Older links. One benefit would be Search on Page capability.

  33. Hail says: • Website
    @Hannah Katz

    And for Democrats, the sooner they can replace their constituents with low IQ serfs who will do what they are told without much fuss, the better

    Slogan idea,

    “Replacing bigots with immigrant serfs who do what they’re told”
    The Democrats: 2020
    [insert rainbow imagery or the like]

    • Agree: fish
  34. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Trevor H.

    Pyramid schemes need ever more entrants.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  35. @Jack D

    And since Joos have this wonderful magic mojo that enables a handful of them to mind control the rest of the population, you should be trying to get them on your side rather than making yourself repellent to them.

    If you want to insist that near hegemony in directing the content of mass media and marketing is “wonderful magic mojo” in order to “mind control” so be it. It seems rather more straightforward than that to me.

    I suppose it’s a Free Market though, so I should build my own public airwaves and nationwide cable network.

  36. Hail says: • Website
    @Anon

    Do Jewish Americans regard whites as… ‘the other Palestinians'(who don’t deserve a wall)?

    Yes. (The Jewish political class does regard us this way).

    “I sympathize with the Palestinians, because I too live under Zionist occupation.” —Greg Johnson

    • Replies: @Anon
  37. @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Astute, if depressing comment! Europe, at least some parts of it, are offering some resistance. But, like you, I see little sign of that kind of resistance in the United States.

  38. @Jack D

    Jack D,

    Thanks for encapsulating both what’s great about your general arguments and what makes me (and others) not trust you as far as we presumably can throw you. (Who knows, maybe you’re a very light guy.)

    Let’s break this down sentence by sentence.

    The focus on Joos around here is insane (although not unusual – Nazis had the same obsession).

    Guilt by association. This is just below you. Also, nice rhetorical trick using “Joos,” which implicitly implies that what’s written around here about Jewish influence is clownish and shouldn’t be taken seriously, thus shutting down debate immediately.

    Don’t address the arguments, just stop people from even considering them. Sad.

    There are 160,000 Jews in Texas, or .6% of the population.

    So what? What percentage of science nobel prizes are awarded to Jews vs their overall percent of the world’s population? What percentage of U.S. billionaires are Jews compared to Jews overall percent of the country’s population?

    George Soros is 0.0000 . . . 1% of the world’s population, yet his impact is huge.

    Stating Jews population as % of Texas’ total population as proof that Jews couldn’t possibly have any real influence is just insulting. Please stop it.

    If .6% of the population can lead the remaining 99.4% around by the nose like cattle, you deserve your fate.

    Totally agree. There’s the Jack D that I like. Gentile whites should stop harping on how “Jews control the media or politics or academia” NOT because it isn’t largely true (as you laughingly assert) but because gentile whites could stop it tomorrow. The Japanese wouldn’t put up with this shit. The Hungarians aren’t putting up with this shit. Gentile whites in the United States should grow a pair and tell elite, influencial Jews who wish to turn the U.S. into a multi-everything Brazil to go to hell.

    But we don’t. We take their money. We watch their propaganda (sorry, entertainment). We allow them to define our culture and values. That’s not elite, influencial, anti-gentile Jews’ fault. It’s gentile whites’ fault.

    And BTW, that .6% is not unanimously in favor of open borders.

    And BTW, many Germans weren’t fans of the Nazis. Didn’t help the Jews much, did it.

    Trump got 28% of the Jewish vote – much higher among the Orthodox and among married Jewish men.

    Gosh, Trump got a whole one out of four Jewish votes, and many of those votes were from the least power group of Jews. That’s great, Jack. I guess that I was wrong about everything that I’ve written so far.

    If you keep focusing on the Joos as the source of your woes you will never get anywhere because the Joos are not the source of your woes.

    Agreed. (See above.)

    By focusing on them you make yourself appear like repellent Nazi clowns and repel people (both Jewish and non-Jewish) who might otherwise sympathize with your position.

    No, by publicly pointing out the pivotal amount of Jewish influence in the forces arrayed against gentile whites, we attract a massive attack from Jews who use every means possible – including destroying careers – to shut down the discussion. Jews in the media associate any discussion of Jewish influence as anti-Semitic and any person who brings up the subject as a Nazi. Is either attack true? Doesn’t matter because the discussion is shut down, just like you are trying to shut it down.

    Btw, what’s with Jews using the word “repellent” when uppity goys bring up Jewish influence. At least, you spelled it right, unlike Podhoretz.

    Regarding losing potential allies, if we can’t discuss Jewish influence, it doesn’t matter. We lose because we can’t address a major source of our problem.

    And since Joos have this wonderful magic mojo that enables a handful of them to mind control the rest of the population, you should be trying to get them on your side rather than making yourself repellent to them.

    Once again, you mock rather than address as a way of belittling (and thus discarding) the discussion of Jewish power used to harm gentile whites. It’s insulting, and we notice, so please stop or you will create what you fear.

    Finally, you seem to be forgetting a second option for gentile whites. Gentile whites are perfectly capable of living without Jews. We don’t need you on our side. If Jews openly join the Coalition of the Fringes (actually, that’s already happened) and gentile whites wake up to that fact, Jewish influence diminishes considerably.

    The acceptance of Jews as “one of us” is a relatively new and particularly white American thing. It’s not the norm. It certainly won’t be the case for non-whites. Jews reached their apex of power because gentile whites in America accepted them. If Jews as a group – and particularly powerful Jews – continue to attack gentile whites, even hayseed whites will figure it out eventually and reject Jews. And that, my friend, will not be good for the Jews.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    , @Lot
  39. Anonymous[156] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    It’s not really about the magic mind control. Let’s face it, Am-Jews are rich, and there is a powerful anti-Gentile strain in their group esp. the baby boomers (read the Mark Rudd article linked here several times). On average blacks are probably far more in the grip of anti-white Animus (not excluding Am-Jews natch) but blacks are poor and can’t accomplish much. Among rich gay men, some are munificent, but many are possessed by childish anti-straight vendettas. Because they’re Rich-Yet-Oppressed, these malignant power-gays egg on every anti-middle-class popular burbling that comes along. The ethnoracial politics don’t line up exactly — that is a pretty weird area for gay men — but it’s the same dynamic. Am-Jews can’t have it both ways, enjoying special victim status while wielding enough clout to ruin some rubes in St. Louis on a whim. The solution is to be more frank with each other, not pretending this afterschool-special drama of every piddling licensed countercultural minority dying to be accepted by Haven Monahan but keeps cruelly getting shut down. It’s the opposite, folks. Listen to some Chinese opinions of American YT some time, they’re brutal.

  40. Anon[135] • Disclaimer says:

    OT

    Reading Steve’s Twitter feed and the comments he has been getting about the recent Taleb, et al. exchange, from IQ skeptics, I realized that most people do not have a clear ID of what IQ is. There seems to be a belief that it is some sort of esoteric Myers-Briggs-like voodoo score, and thus might not mean anything or might be very specialized in its meaning and interpretation.

    As I understand it, IQ is an imperfect, but still 90 percent accurate, attempt to measure g, the general intelligence factor. This is simply a common factor among all cognitive abilities, which include language, math, short-term memory, reaction time, 3D perception, pattern recognition, and some others.

    The diversity of these abilities gives a hint at what g really is: It simply represents how well your brain developed, with higher scores for fewer mutations and goofs and miswirings and so on (vd. the new book Innate on how the brain develops). As there are very few jobs where having a good brain is not helpful, yes, IQ predicts good performance for almost any job.

    However, g only accounts for a portion of your still in each of the abilities, so there is still some task-specific ability not included in IQ. This is why you might perceive yourself or an acquaintance as being good at language, but hopeless at math. Rest assured, the difference between your abilities is not that great when considered globally, but yes, such gaps occur.

    Additionally, personality traits can be independent of IQ, or mostly so, although traits like leadership and creativity do correlate somewhat with IQ.

    At the end of the day IQ is better than any alternative. When a university admissions office says that it is dropping the SAT, an IQ proxy test, because it doesn’t predict success in college. you never hear them continue on to say that their “holistic” method has been independently studied and it produces better results. Because it hasn’t, and it doesn’t.

  41. Hail says: • Website

    iSteve predictions for tonight’s 9 PM Eastern Trump speech and aftermath?

    Scenarios:

    [1.] Trump announces (or eventually gets) $5 billion for wall in new spending bill without major concession (Schumer surrenders to Trump) (highly unlikely);
    [2.] Trump signs spending bill without the wall (Trump surrenders to Schumer) (highly unlikely) (Worst Case);
    [3.] Trump refuses to sign bill unless wall money is offered; no immediate action but vetoes all bills. Congress eventually overrides Trump’s veto after weeks or months;
    [4.] Trump declares emergency to force through wall; courts do not “strike it down” (realistic Best Case);
    [5.] Wall funding traded for DACA amnesty (Bad Case);
    [6.] Fence repair and nebulous border security funds (face-saving measure);
    [7.] Trump declares emergency to force through wall; courts do “strike it down”

    (Adapted from Ramzpaul; descending rank-order outcome probabilities, i.e., he proposes [1.] as lowest and [7.] as highest probability.)

    • Agree: snorlax
  42. @Jack D

    I agree with you completely on this.

  43. @Buzz Mohawk

    What was the IQ of Albert Einstein?

    Although the exact IQ of this man is unknown because he never took the test in his lifetime

  44. @Buzz Mohawk

    The 1% all quickly said: Let them eat cake!

    (Note, I do understand the reality behind that piece of rhetoric.)

  45. snorlax says:
    @Hail

    Maybe add [0.] some outside-the-box deal, e.g. Schumer gives Trump the full $25 billion for the wall and Trump replaces RBG with a liberal. (Risky Case)

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @Hail
  46. istevefan says:
    @Jack D

    Trump got 28% of the Jewish vote

    And that is supposed to be good?

  47. AndrewR says:

    OT: Handsome, masculine, white meteorologist in Rochester accidentally calls St. Martin “Martin Luther Coin

    [MORE]
    ” and then immediately corrects himself and issues an apology. He’s still fired by his parenthetical boss after angry Africans, including the mayor, call for his head.

    https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/01/07/us/new-york-meteorologist-racial-slur/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  48. @Jack D

    If you keep focusing on the Joos as the source of your woes you will never get anywhere because the Joos are not the source of your woes.

    The Joos, no.

    The Jews, yes, absolutely. The inversion of our societal immune system is a Jewish project.

  49. AndrewR says:

    Are comments being memory holed instantly

    • Replies: @Hail
    , @Hail
  50. @istevefan

    The votes were awful. And in such small portions!

  51. @Jack D

    If .6% of the population can lead the remaining 99.4% around by the nose like cattle, you deserve your fate.

    A sentiment shared by every malignant oligarchy in human history.

    You despise as “cattle” the vast majority of Americans who don’t stand up for themselves, you hate as “repellent Nazi clowns” the small minority of Americans who do stand up for themselves.

    In other words, you hate all Americans, whether they defend themselves or not.

  52. Pericles says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Yeah, at least Stacey in LA doesn’t have any kids.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
  53. Pericles says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    The examples of Mexico and Brazil show that white elites can live perfectly well in multi-racial countries, especially if they

    can buy an apartment in Miami or migrate to Portugal when the heat turns up.

  54. Yeah, well, Motel Six looks like the Ritz to the Third-World.

  55. istevefan says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    He knows perfectly well that talking about keeping out people that will change the ethnic composition of the US is, even today, a political non-starter. Most white Americans don’t think in those terms. The percentage of white Americans who would tell their children not to marry someone of Mexican or Guatemalan ethnicity just on racial grounds is probably below 1%.

    The “race replacement” argument works in Hungary or even Germany. It’s a pointless argument in the US and will never gain traction.

    Americans have always been concerned about the the population makeup of their nation, and still are. That is why the First Naturalization Act of 1790 narrowly defined who could be naturalized. That is why we had various exclusion acts over the years. That is why the 1924 Immigration Act was deliberately framed to preserve the existing ethnic mix of the nation.

    In fact in 1965, during debate of the immigration act that would indeed change the ethnic composition of this nation, backers of that bill felt they had to convince Americans that it would not change the ethnic composition of the nation. Here are some quotes from Senator Kennedy during debate of the bill.

    “First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia … In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

    The only reason Kennedy would state such a thing is that he knew Americans would not support an immigration policy that was intended to alter the ethnic composition of the nation. So he lied.

    Americans are well aware of the changing ethnic composition that immigration brings, whether the year is 1965 or 2019. The difference between then and now is only between who must lie or remain silent, and who can openly state their preferences without fear of reprisals.

    Back then you had to lie if you wanted to change the ethnic composition of the nation. Today you have to lie if you want to preserve it. It doesn’t mean people don’t think about it. In fact the side wanting to accelerate the ethnic composition change feels quite free to discuss it publicly and in fact wants to speed up the process.

  56. @Jack D

    And BTW, that .6% is not unanimously in favor of open borders. Trump got 28% of the Jewish vote – much higher among the Orthodox and among married Jewish men.

    Yes. The dying legacy media continuously shout until they are hoarse that the “new” American people are so against Trump and they are the future. Yet, outside of the monolithic African vote, about 1/3 of the more popularly discussed minority groups (Hispanics, Asians) voted for Trump. Or, 1 in 3, to put it in other terms. The religious fanatic left can’t compute that close to one half of the population is NOT on board with eliminating the traditional basic Anglo-Saxon (pro-individual liberty) cultural and governing structure of the nation. In fact, they are hardening into their position.

    • Replies: @Anon
  57. Anon[381] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hail

    Does he also sympathise with Kevin Spacey and Ed Buck?

  58. @Jack D

    Ron Unz should consider adding a “HASBARA” button to the “AGREE/DISAGREE/ETC.” pop up box.

    • Replies: @Lot
  59. Jack D says:
    @istevefan

    Trump got 4% of the black female vote so it’s 7x better than that. And there are a lot more black women. But I don’t see a lot of posts here about how black women are destroying America, it’s all the fault of black women, black women are hypocritical because Africans don’t allow free immigration in their countries, etc. It’s always Joos, Joos, Joos.

    And if you would like to increase that 28% in the next election, having the right blame all the ills of America on the Joos is not the way to do it. The Left practices “no enemies on the Left” but the right wants to exclude everyone who didn’t come over on the Mayflower from being American.

    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
  60. ia says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    The “race replacement” argument works in Hungary or even Germany. It’s a pointless argument in the US and will never gain traction.

    I think you are right in a certain sense but we are entering into a different plain or landscape where whites in the future will not have the luxury of deciding who’s white or who isn’t. They will be told in no uncertain terms who they are. It’s already happening really; it’s just that arrogant, clueless white men haven’t figured it out yet.

  61. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jack D

    And BTW, that .6% is not unanimously in favor of open borders.

    What fraction of it is in favor of open borders? What fraction is in favor of increased or continued high levels of increased immigration. Good luck finding an answer to that, since polls don’t seem to explicitly look for those things with that particular group. My impression is that Jews support high levels of immigration more than do non-latino gentiles, but less than elite Jewish opinion and jewish “thought leaders”.

    Trump got 28% of the Jewish vote – much higher among the Orthodox and among married Jewish men.

    So? Every Republican gets about 30% of the Jewish vote. Among Jews that one hears about and who have a megaphone – politicians, pundits, celebrities – the support for immigration appears to be very high, even among those who lean right. There are exceptions of course, but honestly, those exceptions seem to be rather rare.

    In an event, the whole notion of the Jewish vote is a canard (see, we can use that word too). Other than in a few select places, the Jewish vote is insignificant. What is important is their money. As a group, Jews inject a lot of money into campaigns, and among the super-rich who spend really big to influence elections, Jews are very highly represented.

    If you keep focusing on the Joos as the source of your woes you will never get anywhere because the Joos are not the source of your woes.

    Is this like the Democrats telling us that a wall will never work?

    Anyway, as far as I can tell, the only group more obsessed than Nazis are with Jews are the people who use the term “Joooooos”. And – by the way – that term is played, man. It’s very Ace-of-Spades circa 2005. It’s like “feminazi”.

  62. Jack D says:
    @snorlax

    No and no. Not going to happen either way. #7 is the most likely scenario – some Obama district judge in California will strike it down but it will go to the Supreme Court and Trump will win there (but might take months or years).

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
  63. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Anon

    The Palestinian Authority punishment for a Palestinian selling land to a Jew (not an Israeli) is death.

    I may be a consistent nationalist and therefore support border walls in both America and Israel but an internationalist is not inconsistent for failing to equivocate between the two.

    Comparing the nice Spanish speaker who mows lawns cheaply to a jihadist makes you look nutty.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @Mr. Anon
    , @Mr. Anon
    , @Anon
  64. Jack D says:
    @istevefan

    Trump got 4% of the black female vote so it’s 7x better than that. And there are a lot more black women. But I don’t see a lot of posts here about how black women are destroying America, it’s all the fault of black women, black women are hypocritical because Africans don’t allow free immigration in their countries, etc. It’s always Joos, Joos, Joos.

    And if you would like to increase that 28%, blaming all the ills of the world on the Joos is not the way to do it. People complain that Jews are not identifying as white Americans but why would you want join a club where you are made to feel unwelcome?

  65. @Buzz Mohawk

    From Wikipedia…

    Lazarus argued for the creation of a Jewish homeland thirteen years before Theodor Herzl began to use the term “Zionism”.

    Open borders for her country and a closed ethnic nation state for her people.

  66. kihowi says:
    @Jack D

    Joos

    You’re doing the text version of what children do when they imitate someone they don’t like. “Durrr I’m Kevin I’m a retard durrrr”.

    Not how you get people to take you seriously.

  67. Jack D says:
    @Tyrion 2

    For decades, there was no wall between the West Bank and Israel – Palestinians went back and forth every day and formed the core of the manual labor force on construction jobs, in agriculture, etc. This was mutually beneficial – compared to what they could earn in their little dirt patches back in the village, the pay was lucrative. And these really were jobs that Israelis didn’t want (nowadays these jobs are filled by guest workers from Thailand, China, etc.). It was a win-win.

    Then in 2000, Arafat decided to foment an intifada and started sending dozens of suicide bombers across who were blowing themselves up on buses, in public places, etc. Hundreds were being killed and injured in a small country. It was a desperate situation – every time you left the house felt like you were playing Russian roulette. You had no certainty that you or your loved ones would make it home that day or would you be blown up? So Israel had no choice but to close the border and build a separation wall. If Palestinians no longer have the right to cross into Israel, they have no one to blame but themselves. A consistent theme in Arab history is that Arabs are their own worst enemies. They constantly do stuff that is counter productive and they know that it’s counter productive and yet they feel compelled to do it anyway. They are like the scorpion in the fable – they just can’t help themselves.

    • Agree: Tyrion 2
    • Replies: @bjondo
    , @El Dato
    , @Moshe
  68. J1234 says:

    Keep the government shut down til all obstacles for the building the wall are removed.

  69. @Buzz Mohawk

    Buzz, Well that is a nice looking lunch, more than I typically eat at midday.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
  70. Bud Light says:
    @Anon

    Thank God for Stephen Miller

    • Replies: @Hunsdon
  71. @Buzz Mohawk

    Buzz, Does it really read…”tempest tost?” My mother used to make me cinnamon tost, when we were kids.

    • Replies: @Lot
    , @Buzz Mohawk
  72. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    If you keep focusing on the Joos as the source of your woes you will never get anywhere because the Joos are not the source of your woes.

    Okay, I love Jews. Will Jews now cut it out with open borders and Wars for Israel?

    Has Chuck Schumer changed his mind on the Wall yet?

    Btw, I’m not attacking all ‘Joos’. Sure, there are Jews who understand Open Borders policy is insane. There are Jews like Stephen Cohen who see the current anti-Russia policy as crazy.

    But power works according to rules of ‘winner takes all’. It’s like there were sane Germans who loathed Hitler and his warmongering. But the fact is Hitler had sufficient support among Germans to push through with the madness. And there were Japanese politicians and intellectuals who feared that the Japanese military(esp in Manchuria) were leading Japan down a dangerous path. They tried to stop it, but the lunatics won the day.
    Same with Jews. There are many sane Jews, but they are overpowered and outnumbered by insane Jews. The sane Jews are like the Japanese politicians in the 20s and 30s who tried to de-escalate tensions with China that could blow up into a massive conflict(thereby involving other powers as well).
    But as far as I can see, it seems like Jewish Power is with the insane Jews like Chuck Schumer. And it seems like most powerful Jews, even in the GOP, are bashing sane Jews like Stephen Miller. And even though Israel is called ‘right-wing’, it seems more than happy to work with globalists in US and EU. Israel sent its ‘humanitarian’ groups to Europe to save ‘refugees’. Funny that a nation with walls against Muslims wages wars in the Middle East, uproots Muslims, and then guides the ‘refugee’ hordes into Europe.

    There are sane Jews, but they don’t have the power. The winner-takes-all advantage is with the globo-homo Jews. So, does it make a difference for whites to side with sane Jews who have little power? It’d be like the US deciding not to fight back against Germany and Japan in WWII on account of there being good/sane Japanese and Germans who oppose the war. Yeah, but those good/sane Japanese and Germans were NOT in control of Japanese and German world strategy.
    And so, we must ask, WHO controls Jewish Power? The sane Jews or insane Jews? It seems the insane ones are in control.

    What you say would make good sense IF sane Jews controlled Jewish Power. If Jewish Power is overwhelmingly pro-white and happy partners of white Americans, why alienate the Jewish community? But as it stands, Jewish Power is virulently anti-white. Just look at NYT search for Evil Whitey even though anyone experienced with journalism would have smelled a skunk upon hearing of Nazi-KKK lunatic prowling black neighborhood to kill some cute black girl.

    If .6% of the population can lead the remaining 99.4% around by the nose like cattle, you deserve your fate.

    Jews lead goyim by the nose like cattle because goyim take the advice of guys like you who say ‘Trust Jews no matter what they do to you guys’. In any negotiation, there has to be give and take: Jews give something and take something, Goyim give something and take something.
    So, my point is this: It would make sense for whites to support Zionism against Palestinians IF Jews support white Americanism against the non-white hordes. It’d be give and take.
    But even though whites totally support Zionism, most Jews are hellbent on turning whites into minorities in their own nations. Actually it’s worse. Not just into minorities but vilified and scapegoated minorities who are to be blamed for everything. Indeed, what is the rallying and unifying call to keep the Diversity Coalition together? “We all hate whitey.”

    Also, power isn’t just about numbers. It’s about key institutions. Even in a totally homogeneous and autonomous society, only a handful of people in key institutions get to call the shots that decide the long-term direction of the nation. Even within the Deep State, most people have only managerial power. Only a few have directorial or directional power. Whether in the US or USSR or Nazi Germany or Red China, most of the managerial class just shuffle papers, carry out daily tasks, and follow orders. It was not the managerial class in Nazi Germany that decided on invading Russia. Whether Hitler chose peace or war with Russia, the managerial class would have just done as told. It’s hardly surprising that many of the Nazi managerial class later served in East Germany as servants of the communist system. The upper managerial class is tiny compared to the overall population, but even most of the upper management have no say in the direction or agency of power. People like James Comey never decide the direction of the nation. After all, management is task-centered. One is given a task to do and tries to do it well.
    The Real Power is among those who with the power of vision as either king of the hill(like Hitler or Mao) or puppet-master(like Sheldon Adelson or Koch Brothers). And their sense of national or global direction can be driven by ideology, tribalism, or egotism. Communism was ideology driven, and so, for a time, communist elites sought to spread the revolution(before the inspiration finally died out). Jews are tribal driven, though they mask their ethnocentric directionalism with bogus talk about ‘liberal democratic values’ and ‘fighting terrorism'(when, more often than not, Jewish power has been allied with terrorism). And then, there are guys like Alexander the Great and Hitler whose direction was ultimately decided by egotism as ‘man of destiny’. Or egotism can serve the greed of guys like Jeff Bezos.

    And this is why it is wrong to ridicule most goyim for being led by the nose like cattle. Most people in all nations are led by the nose. Whether it’s homogeneous North Korea or diverse Egypt, most people have no say in anything. They are just masses whose daily lives are about having enough bread and circuses for the day. And even the upper managerial class don’t get to say anything about the direction of the nation. They just do their jobs, like Baath Party members under Hussein in Iraq. Only a tiny-tiny-tiny elite get to decide the directional fate of nations, and these people happen to be embedded in certain key institutions of power. Because Jews are well-entrenched in key institutions in the US, they get to decide the narrative, dogma, idols, and policy.

    To end this unfair and unjust state of affairs, Americans must wake up to the fact of Jewish Power and its passions and agendas. Only then will white Americans no longer be led by the nose.
    The problem with you is that you mock white Americans for being led by the nose BUT THEN you condemn any awakening among whites as to what is really going on.

  73. istevefan says:

    People complain that Jews are not identifying as white Americans but why would you want join a club where you are made to feel unwelcome?

    In 1790, Jews were covered under the Naturalization Act of 1790 which limited this privilege to free whites, and thus they were allowed to naturalize. Jews were given citizenship and the right to freely practice their religion in the USA probably earlier than any other place since they lost their nation to the Romans.

    White Americans fought and died to help the Balfour Declaration come into play, thus leading to the creation of modern Israel.

    White Americans fought and died to help stop the killing of Jews in WW2.

    White Americans supported the creation of modern Israel and endured heavy penalties such as the 1973 Arab oil embargo for doing so. Not to mention the billions they have transferred to keep Israel viable. And they supported the continued presence of American forces in the middle east to help shape that area to be more amenable to Israeli interests.

    No other group of people worldwide has done more for Israel than White Americans. No other nation in world history has allowed Jews to flourish to such an extent as White America.

    If Jews don’t feel comfortable with White Americans, then that suggests the problem lies with Jews. I don’t see what else White Americans can do. And if allowing ourselves to be displaced by immigrants is the price we have to pay to increase our share of the Jewish vote, then I say that is a price we should not pay.

  74. Ah. Another iSteve thread about America’s future where the underlying theme by the Boomer/Xer contingent is “Please let nothing happen that affects my reverse mortgage and 50 state RV national park tour please please please nothing that might in any way mess with my standard of living as karmic debt for for the policies my cohort pushed.”

    The future is not smothered to death with a pillow or fantasy land where the Left discovers a charity to dissenting views it has never displayed ever and lets you live in peace while you go on your RV tour.

    The future is war. Either be a fighter or be cattle.

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
    , @MBlanc46
  75. istevefan says:
    @Jack D

    People complain that Jews are not identifying as white Americans but why would you want join a club where you are made to feel unwelcome?

    In 1790, Jews were covered under the Naturalization Act of 1790 which limited this privilege to free whites, and thus they were allowed to naturalize. Jews were given citizenship and the right to freely practice their religion in the USA probably earlier than any other place since they lost their nation to the Romans.

    White Americans fought and died to help the Balfour Declaration come into play, thus leading to the creation of modern Israel.

    White Americans fought and died to help stop the killing of Jews in WW2.

    White Americans supported the creation of modern Israel and endured heavy penalties such as the 1973 Arab oil embargo for doing so. Not to mention the billions they have transferred to keep Israel viable. And they supported the continued presence of American forces in the middle east to help shape that area to be more amenable to Israeli interests.

    No other group of people worldwide has done more for Israel than White Americans. No other nation in world history has allowed Jews to flourish to such an extent as White America.

    If Jews don’t feel comfortable with White Americans, then that suggests the problem lies with Jews. I don’t see what else White Americans can do. And if allowing ourselves to be displaced by immigrants is the price we have to pay to increase our share of the Jewish vote, then I say that is a price we should not pay.

  76. @Alfa158

    Nothing is set in stone.

    Throw out illegals (and their native-born anchor babies on the legal theory that a thief (of citizenship) cannot convey good title), start a preferential immigration program to import Whites, especially those with education and young children and grant them affirmative action and a fast track to citizenship, use the sanctuary city bullshit to import whites free from central government interference, etc.

    Couple that with violent attacks by a domestic terror group on non-white immigrants such as the French Arabs are doing to French Jews which are causing the French Jewish population to emigrate (borrow a phrase from the Arab Algerians – “The suitcase or the coffin!”) and pretty soon, America would have a pretty solid long term White demographic future.

    It’s not that it can’t be done, it’s do we have the will to do it? The White man would rather die than be called a racist, currently. But look how much things have changed in
    the last three years.

    I find it hard to believe that the White man,

  77. @Alfa158

    Nothing is set in stone.

    Throw out illegals (and their native-born anchor babies on the legal theory that a thief (of citizenship) cannot convey good title), start a preferential immigration program to import Whites, especially those with education and young children and grant them affirmative action and a fast track to citizenship, use the sanctuary city bullshit to import whites free from central government interference, etc.

    Couple that with violent attacks by a domestic terror group on non-white immigrants such as the French Arabs are doing to French Jews which are causing the French Jewish population to emigrate (borrow a phrase from the Arab Algerians – “The suitcase or the coffin!”) and pretty soon, America would have a pretty solid long term White demographic future.

    It’s not that it can’t be done, it’s do we have the will to do it? The White man would rather die than be called a racist, currently. But look how much things have changed in
    the last three years.

    I find it hard to believe that the White man, the greatest organized killing machine in history, will simply go gentle into that good night.

    White men have two major problems:

    Our women are against us, we have lost control of them, and

    We think our biggest enemy are the third world races. Our biggest enemy are our fellow white traitors.

    We may have to fight a white-on-white civil war first. Observing what we will have to do to our fellow whites may well encourage non-whites to leave while they can.

    Obviously, I would much prefer that this country not undergo such horrors. But a White South African style future as the alternative is untenable.

    We may have no other choice.

    • Replies: @Joseph Doaks
  78. Mr. Anon says:
    @Tyrion 2

    I may be a consistent nationalist and therefore support border walls in both America and Israel but an internationalist is not inconsistent for failing to equivocate between the two.

    I thought you were a citizen of the UK. So how are you an American nationalist? Or are you an Israeli nationalist? Or are you just whatever you need to be to accomplish whatever your rhetorical purposes are at the moment?

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  79. bjondo says:
    @Jack D

    Also like the fabled scorpion,
    you can’t help yourself.
    Jew so innocent.

  80. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jack D

    People complain that Jews are not identifying as white Americans but why would you want join a club where you are made to feel unwelcome?

    Why would anyone want to admit to their club newcomers who take over the club and make its founders feel unwelcome?

  81. The Democrats supported spending $8 Billion to construct a wall along the Mexican border just 5 years ago. The gang of 8 bill included an additional $42 Billion funding for border security.

    Trump derangement syndrome is handing Trump another victory , helping to expose the democrats hypocrisy and forcing them to admit they seek open borders , no border security and more refugees. Restricting immigration and building a wall remain popular with Americans and the dems are foolish to obstruct Trump on the Wall. This can only help Trump win again in 2020 , as Trump can blame the dems for not funding the wall. The dems would be very foolish to make this a campaign issue in 2020.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  82. @Jack D

    I believe that it’s spelled “Jews”. 🙂

    We’re not blaming all the world’s ills on Jews. Just the portion that they’re responsible for. You seem to have a major problem with that.

    Regarding black women, what % of Dem Party donations come from black women? How many major TV networks, newspapers and news websites are either owned or run by black women? How many major Hollywood producers are black women?

    I think that you get the point.

    You seem quite angry that people bring up the role of Jews in funding and promoting past and current anti-white political policies and cultural changes. Instead of insulting us, why don’t you simply show us where we’re wrong. Show us how Jews haven’t funded and promoted such things, and how just as many Jews have been fighting on our side.

    I know why, because you can’t.

    People complain that Jews are not identifying as white Americans but why would you want join a club where you are made to feel unwelcome?

    And just why might gentile whites have developed these feelings, Jack? If you honestly don’t know, then, well, there’s not much left to discuss.

    • Replies: @Lot
  83. Also, watch and see RBG is going to have been functionally dead for the past week.

    • Replies: @istevefan
  84. Mr. Anon says:

    In a recent Tucker Carlson show, he had on Chris Hahn, a smarmy liberal hack who was an aide to Senator Chuck Shumer, and asked him exactly how is it that walls are “immoral”.

    Tucker has taken to asking guests like this why Israel’s wall is okay, but our having a wall on the Mexican border is not okay. The answer always amounts to some variant of: Israel is different. It’s just different, because reasons. Their unstated premise is also that what is going on at the Mexican border is not an invasion, when effectively, it is exactly that.

    In this case, Hahn repeats the old BS line about how a wall on the Mexican border is useless because a guy with a ladder can scale it. However Israel is different because people are lobbing bombs into Israel.

    Huh? So………………..walls don’t stop pedestrians, but they do stop rockets, mortars, etc.

    Tucker should have asked Hahn: Have you ever seen a wall? Do you even know what a wall is?

  85. Mr. Anon says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Comparing the nice Spanish speaker who mows lawns cheaply to a jihadist makes you look nutty.

    Are all palestinians jihadists? Are all illegal aliens nice guys who just mow lawns? I’ll answer that last question. No. A lot of them are murderers, drug dealers, rapists, child molesters, thieves, drunk drivers or some combination thereof. And even the ones who aren’t will still change my country into some other country, so I don’t want them here, “nice” or not.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  86. Whiskey says: • Website
    @istevefan

    It is not just or even primarily Jews. I moved on the periphery very much so as an amateur photographer and reviewer of the SoCal indie music scene and as a teacher and web developer.

    Hatred of mainstream White society and its values is pretty much bog standard particularly among the most suburban.

    Revolt of the elites. Jews in elite circles just surf the wave. They are as relevant as a piece of driftwood in a rip current.

  87. Doug says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    > CNN, NBC, FOX, New York Times, the Ivy League, the Congress, AIPAC, ADL, SPLC…

    CNN is owned by Turner Broadcasting and founded by Ted Turner. A middle-class Scotch-Irish from Ohio. Fox is founded and controlled by Rupert Murdoch, a WASP from Australia. The New York Times’s majority shareholder is Slim Carlos, a Lebanese-Mexican, and its executive editor is a black creole from Louisiana. Congress is controlled by Nancy Pelosi, an Italian-Catholic, and Mitch McConnell, a Scotch-Irish from Alabama.

    Total pro-Israel lobbying spending (including AIPAC) was $3.8 million in 2018. It doesn’t even rank in the top 50 of lobbying spenders, and makes it less than 1% as powerful as the biggest groups like pharma companies ($3.9 *billion*), the oil lobby ($2 billion), and the real estate lobby ($1.5 billion). In fact the entire Israel lobby is less than half as powerful as the (gentile) Koch brothers alone ($9 million).

    The ADL’s total endowment is $77 million. It doesn’t even rank in the top 100 largest non-profits in the US. It’s less than 1% the size of the (WASP) Gates Foundation, (Huguenot-founded, Irish-led) Howard Hughes Foundation, (black) Ford Foundation, or (WASP) Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

    SPLC is founded and controlled by Morris Dees, a Southern Baptist from Alabama.

  88. Silly Deplorables!

    Big beautiful walls patrolled by men carrying big beautiful guns are for Pelosi’s, Clintons, and Obamas.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  89. @The Germ Theory of Disease

    “If America is really only an idea, then let’s just write the idea down on a piece of paper and mail it to Mexico, Honduras, India, Africa, Pakistan and China.”

    Been there done that. Viz: the shithole called Liberia.

    Wherever they go, shitholes creates shitholes.

  90. Boethiuss says:
    @Hail

    I’d say a variation on #3 is the most likely. It could be that Trump vetoes extraneous bills from Congress. It’s probably more likely that Dems in Congress either refuse to pass or filibuster extraneous bills on their end, leading to the same place.

    Ultimately, I think enough Republicans in Congress will capitulate and reopen the government. It’s mostly a question of what, if anything they will get. They will probably get something, considering that we’ve had the shutdown for a few weeks already with little if any impact.

  91. bucky says:

    I still think that Bush/Rove were right about Mexican immigration and working to convert Hispanics into a GOP voting Bloc. The upmost importance in this country is resisting the black narrative, and Hispanics could play a role in this.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  92. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    The Palestinian Authority punishment for a Palestinian selling land to a Jew (not an Israeli) is death.

    Palestinian faces surer death when refusing to relinquish his land to Jewish ‘settlers’ backed by IDF.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  93. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack D

    The focus on Joos around here is insane (although not unusual – Nazis had the same obsession). There are 160,000 Jews in Texas, or .6% of the population. If .6% of the population can lead the remaining 99.4% around by the nose like cattle, you deserve your fate.

    Yeah, this. It’s important to appreciate that it’s upper-middle class white people who are controlling the coalition for the other side. Those upper-middle class white people are disproportionately Jewish though not a majority, not really even close. Like you said, there’s just not enough Jews to make it work.

    We need to rethink Steve’s formulation of the Coalition of the Fringes vs the Core. Specifically the Core is much more hostile to us now than before Trump was elected.

  94. @istevefan

    No other group of people worldwide has done more for Israel than White Americans. No other nation in world history has allowed Jews to flourish to such an extent as White America.

    I suspect that more than a few non-whites around the world will notice how this turned out for White America.

    I’ve been saying for years that we’re past “peak Jew.” Jewish power – both in the U.S. and Israeli power – will fall along with gentile White Americans. That American and Israeli Jews can’t understand this is baffling. Or perhaps it isn’t so surprising.

    Regardless, we’re all Jews now, so time to start acting like it.

  95. Boethiuss says:

    But these contradictory rationalizations are motivated by the heartfelt sentiment that Americans don’t deserve a Wall.

    Steve’s OP is right as far as it goes, but what does that mean for us? I know for me at least, the answer is pretty clear. We can talk to normie America, to say that we d0 deserve a wall, but the Orange Man Bad distortion field is in the way. So let’s get rid of it and make our case.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  96. Jack D says:
    @istevefan

    I complete agree with you. Few countries have been as kind and accepting of the Jews as the US. Personally, I owe my very existence to the GI’s who fought to liberate my father from the camps (also to Stalin who deported my mother across the Urals and far from German lines, but I digress) and my existence as an American to the Truman refugee policy. (OTOH, you cannot deny there have also been times when America was NOT welcoming to the Jews – tragically this period coincided with the rise of Hitler and many Jewish refugees were turned away by the US. Whatever happened then and whatever the university and employment policies of that time were, that was 80 years ago – certainly in my adult lifetime institutional anti-Semitism in America is all but extinct).

    However, there is a strain on the alt-right that is distinctly unfriendly to the Jews and who make it clear that they don’t want Jews spoiling the purity of their (non-existent) future white ruled homeland. Most American Jews feel welcome as Americans but not so welcome on the alt right. Personally, I have encountered more anti-Semitism here than I have in a lifetime in meat space. Trump himself could not be more welcoming of Jews but I can’t say that for some of the folks around here. It was said of Henry Adams that when he saw Vesuvius erupting he searched for the Jew who was stoking the fire and I get that same feeling here sometimes too.

  97. Mr. Anon says:
    @Doug

    CNN is owned by Turner Broadcasting and founded by Ted Turner.

    Turner Broadcasting is owned by Warner Media, founded by Steve Ross:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Ross_(businessman)

    CNN’s current president is Jeff Zucker.

    The New York Times’s majority shareholder is Slim Carlos, a Lebanese-Mexican,…

    Wrong. Slim’s stake in the Times was never more than 17%.

    Total pro-Israel lobbying spending (including AIPAC) was $3.8 million in 2018.

    Most Israel lobbyists are not registered as lobbyists or foreign agents. And you are neglecting the enormous amount of campaign cash spent by those “non lobbyists”.

    As to the rest of your post, most of it was disingenuous BS.

    Have you been lying long? You’re not very good at it.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    , @Doug
    , @anon
  98. @Peter Akuleyev

    they don’t share thousands of years of common traditions, ancestry and language

    Since that’s the benchmark for preserving your country, I’d like to point out that very few countries around the world meet it. Certainly, no one from Tijuana to Buenos Aires does. This is a scrap between people with exactly the same claim to the New World. And since they’re the ones coming here, we have a right to demand that they adjust to us, just as they would do that to English-speaking gringos who emigrated to their countries.

    Some of Europe doesn’t meet your benchmark either. Britain, which likes to think of itself as an ancient and magical place, only has about 900 years under its belt where one could say a “common language and culture” were in existence. That’s far short of “thousands,” isn’t it? So, let the invaders pour across the U.K. — oh wait, they already are.

  99. @Doug

    Carlos Slim is not slim.

    Carlos Slim is a fat-faced billionaire dirtbag who grabs money from tens of millions of Amerindians and Mestizos in Mexico. Carlos Slim is a Lebanese money-grubber who has made a lot of money by pushing policies that are harmful to the best interests of the USA.

    Carlos Slim controls a good chunk of the New York Times, that is true. But the Sulzbergers control that disgusting rumpswab called the New York Times.

    Carlos Slim and the WASP/JEW ruling class of the United States are using the mass immigration invasion of Mexican Amerindians and Mestizos as a demographic weapon to attack the European Christian ancestral core of the United States.

    President Trump should send the US military into Mexico to capture Carlos Slim the same way George HW Bush used the US military to capture Noriega in Panama.

  100. @Peter Akuleyev

    What happens to the non-elite Whites when we go Brazil? There are scores of millions of us.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
  101. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack D

    No and no. Not going to happen either way. #7 is the most likely scenario – some Obama district judge in California will strike it down but it will go to the Supreme Court and Trump will win there (but might take months or years).

    This could happen but I don’t think that the people thinking this way, especially those outside the Administration, have appreciated the problems with trying this. We think that building a wall on Presidential authority is right-wing DACA, but at least in one important way it’s not.

    DACA was essentially one action, maybe three or four at the outside, which basically means that the courts are going to be reviewing one or three or four things. Building a wall is necessarily the culmination of hundreds of actions, each of which can be reviewed by the courts. It could be, maybe it’s even likely, that SCOTUS or another organ of the US judiciary will agree that building a wall is a proper exercise of POTUS national defense responsibilities.

    But still, there’s water rights here, a property dispute there, an endangered species in some other place. It’s a long long stretch to think that the President’s fiat is just going to bulldoze all those things away, without modification or impediment by the judiciary.

    • Replies: @Hail
  102. @Doug

    Yep, Jews are just another group among many when it comes to political influence. Oh wait.

    https://www.jpost.com/US-Elections/US-Jews-contribute-half-of-all-donations-to-the-Democratic-party-468774

    And how could anyone think that the Jews are a major player in the entertainment field.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

    And who can forget Netanyahu’s speech before Congress. Look at America’s leaders, terrified to be the first person to stop clapping. Totally normal.

    Seriously, I don’t mind that Jews have achieved such success. I do mind that you’re pissing on my head and telling me that it’s raining.

    Don’t create what you fear.

  103. Mr. Anon says:
    @Boethiuss

    We can talk to normie America, to say that we d0 deserve a wall, but the Orange Man Bad distortion field is in the way. So let’s get rid of it and make our case.

    If Mitt Romney were asking for $ 5 billion to build a wall – not that he ever would – but if he were, he would get the same reception.

    Your whole “Trump is bad for the GOP – instead, let’s descend into interparty warfare” schtick is tiresome and stupid. You don’t like Trump? Fine don’t vote for him in 2020. Vote for Mitt Romney. Or David French. Or Evan MacGuffin. Or whomever else you prefer – all of whom you claim would be better. You probably think Denny Hastert would be better than Trump. Nobody cares what you think.

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
  104. Jack D says:
    @Anon

    That’s a lie. Unless Palestinians resist violently, they are completely safe. Israel has no death penalty so even captured Palestinian baby killers are nicely fed and housed until they are exchanged by the thousands for the body of an Israel soldier. OTOH, Israelis who fall into Palestinian hands are often torn to bits amid frenzied celebrations.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    , @Anon
    , @El Dato
  105. istevefan says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    He knows perfectly well that talking about keeping out people that will change the ethnic composition of the US is, even today, a political non-starter.

    Yet we know perfectly well that talking about letting people in that will change the ethnic composition of the USA is perfectly admissible.

    Most white Americans don’t think in those terms. The percentage of white Americans who would tell their children not to marry someone of Mexican or Guatemalan ethnicity just on racial grounds is probably below 1%.

    The “race replacement” argument works in Hungary or even Germany. It’s a pointless argument in the US and will never gain traction.

    Americans have always been concerned about the the population makeup of their nation, and still are. That is why the First Naturalization Act of 1790 narrowly defined who could be naturalized. That is why we had various exclusion acts over the years. That is why the 1924 Immigration Act was deliberately framed to preserve the existing ethnic mix of the nation.

    In fact in 1965, during debate of the immigration act that would indeed change the ethnic composition of this nation, backers of that bill felt they had to convince Americans that it would not change the ethnic composition of the nation. Here are some quotes from Senator Kennedy during debate of the bill.

    “First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia … In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

    The only reason Kennedy would state such a thing is that he knew Americans would not support an immigration policy that was intended to alter the ethnic composition of the nation. So he lied.

    Americans are well aware of the changing ethnic composition that immigration brings, whether the year is 1965 or 2019. The difference between then and now is only between who must lie or remain silent, and who can openly state their preferences without fear of reprisals.

    Back then you had to lie if you wanted to change the ethnic composition of the nation. Today you have to lie if you want to preserve it. It doesn’t mean people don’t think about it. In fact the side wanting to accelerate the ethnic composition change feels quite free to discuss it publicly and in fact wants to speed up the process.

  106. Lot says:
    @Buffalo Joe

    You must not make lossed
    The tempest-tossed
    Emma to America bost

  107. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Tyrion 2

    As Douglas Murray points out, those entrants don’t count if they aren’t paying.

  108. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Jack D

    >Unless Palestinians resist violently, they are completely safe.
    Okay.

  109. @Cagey Beast

    He didn’t say anything other than “Don’t talk about Jewish influence.” Is that what you agree with?

    Show me how we’re all so wrong that Jews have been pivotal in funding and promoting the flooding of the West with non-whites and creating an anti-(gentile) white culture.

    Have gentile whites also been major players? Of course, but Jews have played a major, if not decisive, role in what has unfolded over the past 60 years. Why is that so hard to admit?

    That said, I do agree with Jack that gentile whites need to stop whining about the Jews, not because a portion of their population hasn’t actively (and successfully) attempted to destroy our societies but because we could stop it at any time.

    Grow a pair and tell anti-White Jews to fuck off. Keep your blood money. If you harass us, we’ll harass you. We’ll create our own entertainment if your shows trash us. We’ll hire whites fired from Google. That’s what gentile whites should do instead of bitching about Jews. It’s not Jews’ job to watch out for gentile whites.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
  110. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    Unless Palestinians resist violently, they are completely safe.

    You’re trolling, right?

    I mean, isn’t it the patriotic duty of a people to violently resist invasion?

    Suppose super-powerful Iranians decided to move into Israel and take land. Wouldn’t Jews resist violently? Would Iranian invasion be okay IF Iranians went easy on the peaceable Jews who just surrender their land to Iranians and slink away?

  111. istevefan says:
    @Jack D

    However, there is a strain on the alt-right that is distinctly unfriendly to the Jews and who make it clear that they don’t want Jews spoiling the purity of their (non-existent) future white ruled homeland.

    Could you also say there is a strain among Jewry that is distinctly unfriendly to White Gentiles, and who make it clear they don’t want White Gentiles to have any white-ruled homelands, whether in the New World or even in Europe?

    • Agree: Buzz Mohawk
    • Replies: @Doug
    , @Jack D
  112. @Jack D

    Perhaps if you acknowledge why some on alt-right might have some issues with influential Jews, we might find some common ground.

    I certainly can understand why some (maybe many) Jews would harbor fears and distrust of gentile whites, but you seem to be baffled as to why we might feel the same.

  113. Clyde says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Obama made being biracial cool. He gave a huge boost to the race mixing industry. I mean all kinds of interracial dating and marriage, not just white-black. Before Obama got in I never thought about the word “biracial”.
    I get the impression that before Obama many biracials felt confused and inferior. Now they get to strut their stuff in TV advertising and all kinds of advertising. In TV and movies. Biracial is cutting edge. It is the future. At least this is what is being pushed onto us.
    Can you see Idris Elba as the next James Bond and getting it on with various white women? The Final Frontier.

  114. @Whiskey

    Bullshit.

    To their credit, Jews fight back. They push hard to influence the society in which they live. Always have, which is one of the reasons why they’ve had some many problems with their host countries.

    Whether you think that this is a good thing or a bad thing, it is reality. To compare Jews to driftwood is ridiculous and makes everything else that you write (which is often enlightening) less trustworthy. It’s also insulting to Jews, who work hard to protect their people – whether or not I agree with their methods.

  115. @Buffalo Joe

    Exactly. One of the points is that we now have homeless people in America who would not normally be homeless. It appears that the woman in the photograph is maintaining her civilized lifestyle as best she can in a time when over-immigration has displaced her and excessive foreign imports have eliminated jobs.

    More and more citizens, who own this country and very likely have ancestors going way back, cannot find employment gainful enough to pay for a place to live when millions are allowed in to undercut their wages and crowd into available housing, and products we buy do not support our workers.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon
  116. Trump has been a big disappointment on the immigration issue.

    Many of us would like to see Trump fulfill his campaign promises by drastically reducing legal immigration and deporting illegal alien invaders. Trump has not kept his promises to his voter base.

    If I were president I would be calling for an immigration moratorium and I would deport every illegal alien invader in the United States.

    One thing I do want to see and hear Trump do tonight is to bring up the example of Israel as a nation that has successfully provided for the safety and security of their citizens by building walls, fencing, obstacles and barriers to prevent illegal infiltration.

    Trump loves the cheap labor that mass immigration and illegal immigration provides for greedy money-grubbing slobs. Trump uses foreigner visas and other foreigners to staff his businesses. We have to be honest about that.

    That is why Trump hardly ever brings up the wage-reducing, American worker replacing aspects of mass immigration and illegal immigration.

    Trump could talk about the hard scrabble Israeli Jews who saw South Tel Aviv get flooded with foreigners, and they told their government to clear out the foreigners. The Israeli government, unlike the US government, actually did start to clear out the foreigners from South Tel Aviv, and the Israeli government built walls, fences, barriers and obstacles to prevent further illegal alien infiltration of Israel.

    Trump Has Treated His Voter Base Like Chumps — It’s True!

  117. Russ says:
    @Stick

    Meanwhile, Cindy McCain is

    • Replies: @Russ
  118. @Doug

    Oh, okay. I’m sorry I didn’t satisfy your attention to detail.

    Jews do not have inordinate influence over American thought, culture, media, foreign policy, education, finance, or fifty years of “progressive” activism. They don’t massively push for over-immigration, especially of non-Europeans. And every other person on my TV screen isn’t either Jewish or black either. And almost every anti-white screed in the New York Times isn’t written by a Jew either.

    Nevermind.

    (And note my use of the word “inordinate.” For a measly 2%, they sure are constantly in my face. In the words of Ann Coulter, “How many fucking Jews do they think there are in this country?”

  119. Anonymous[331] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Muslim impersonates white nationalist in anonymous discussion forum with some cliche cut-and-paste Israel screed.
    Unsavvy white nationalists salivate.
    Dog bites man.

  120. Russ says:
    @Russ

    … screw this commenting system

  121. istevefan says:
    @Whiskey

    Revolt of the elites. Jews in elite circles just surf the wave. They are as relevant as a piece of driftwood in a rip current.

    There are two extremes on this. One is that Jews are 100 percent responsible for the rot we see. The other is that they have no influence over it at all.

    Just as I do not subscribe to the former, I am also not prepared to dismiss them as “a piece of driftwood in a rip current.”

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  122. AndrewR says:
    @AndrewR

    Should say “Coon” not “Coin”, obviously, but the website is broken and the comment disappeared as soon as I posted this comment. I guess I could proofread before posting but, when there an edit feature, that shouldn’t be necessary.

  123. @Jack D

    I can understand why some working and lower-middle class whites in the US are hostile to diaspora Jews. As an urban market dominant minority, Jews tend to favour policies which disadvantage working and lower-middle class people, especially those outside big cities. For example, Jews in the US have done well out of free trade, financial deregulation, and the growth of the service economy, while many ordinary white Americans have suffered. To understand why a lot of people hate diaspora Jews, you have to understand producerism and hostility to finance-driven capitalism. It’s no coincidence that the anti-Semitic Nazis glorified manufacturing and agriculture, or that the nationalistic communists like Stalin eventually turned on the Jews.

    What I don’t get is why American white nationalists are always bashing Israel, when the Jews in Israel are the least hostile to white gentiles and populist/nationalism in Europe. To me this looks like existential hatred – we hate you for being anti-nationalist, but we still hate you for being pro-nationalist.

  124. @Buffalo Joe

    Merriam-Webster says it’s an archaic past tense of toss.

    tost
    Definition of tost

    archaic past tense of TOSS

    It’s common in artistic expression.

    I like tost salad. Sometimes even with little pieces of tost in it.

  125. @Anon

    To Jews, a huge mass of non-whites amounts to a Human Wall or Barrier against White Power.

    It’s true Jews are ridiculously pro-immigration. But is this really their motive?

    It seems to me they have flourished insanely well under the (previously) existing “White Power” regime.

    Why would they want to give up such a good thing and take their chances with a new regime run by Blacks, Hispanics, and Muslim immigrants? All of these groups are vastly more hostile to Jews than Whites are.

    Of course, Jews could be executing a scheme that is simply ill-considered and counterproductive. But an incorrect assessment of self-interest or lack of intelligence is not normally associated with this group.

  126. Jack D says:
    @unpc downunder

    we hate you for being anti-nationalist, but we still hate you for being pro-nationalist.

    When my father was a young man in Poland, he would hear anti-Semites chanting , “Jews to Palestine”. Nowadays, they chant “Jews out of Palestine”. You might get the idea that anti-Semites don’t really want Jews anywhere.

    • Agree: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @istevefan
    , @El Dato
  127. @Buzz Mohawk

    Simply designate skid row as a national park. The homeless then become urban campers enjoying the outdoors. Problem solved.

  128. Doug says:
    @istevefan

    > who make it clear they don’t want White Gentiles to have any white-ruled homelands

    Can you at least cite one major Jewish person who’s every said anything close to this?

    I’ve certainly heard of multiculturalists who happen to be Jewish. Just the same as I’ve heard of Catholic multiculturalists, Nordic multiculturalists, and left-handed multiculturalists. Certainly the mere existence of any of these examples doesn’t prove a widespread plot against Protestants, Anglo-Saxons or right-handers.

    But I’ve never heard of anyone advocating multiculturalism specifically as a tactic for winning some sort of perceived Jewish power struggle against white gentiles. Again, if you have any record of any major figure saying something like this, please enlighten me.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @Anon
  129. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Mr. Anon

    I support nations for both. Duh!

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  130. @Pericles

    She can’t afford to.

    And 50 years of media-, academic-, and pop cultural-brainwashing have convinced her not to have a husband either.

  131. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Are all Chinese people short? Are all Dutch people tall? Are you capable of understanding that generalising is both not being 100% accurate but also telling the truth?

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  132. Anonymous[268] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Taleb is inarticulate — listen to him on YouTube. He also tries to dazzle you with math. The fact is, the math he is posting on twitter is just high school and undergraduate stuff. I could post dazzling math equations on twitter, but it doesn’t mean I’m a great mathematician. It just means I am reading an undergraduate book on probabjlty, and want to show you all what I have Learned. Neat!

    Also, his ideas are basic. Skin in the game…. OK duh.

    So Steve, don’t think that the guy is smart. You’re way smarter than him.

  133. Boethiuss says:
    @unpc downunder

    What I don’t get is why American white nationalists are always bashing Israel, when the Jews in Israel are the least hostile to white gentiles and populist/nationalism in Europe. To me this looks like existential hatred – we hate you for being anti-nationalist, but we still hate you for being pro-nationalist.

    Yeah, me either. To be honest I don’t get too worked up over the Jews in either direction, pro or con. To the extent I have a (recent) opinion of them, I’m reasonably sympathetic to Israeli nationalism, substantially less so to Jewish cultural Leftism in America.

    But no matter which it is, I’m going to want to think in terms of responses and actions, and in terms of the Jews there’s not necessarily a whole lot available. For those who have their complaints against the Jews, they typically say things like “Why can we criticize white Americans, or Russians, or Muslims, but never Jews or Israel?” Fine, that sucks, now what?

    What we can do is take on a mentality of collective solidarity and vote Republican. And let’s face it, that’s basically what the Jews do (except for the Republican part). And if we can’t even be bothered to do that, which is the intention of a lot of the commentariat here, there’s not much percentage in complaining about whatever it is the Jews are doing.

  134. El Dato says:

    Semi-on-topic “wall management”:

    Monsieur Erdogan, aggressive promoter of population replacement by Turkish Muslims, finds that Kurdish separatists are actual instigators of “Gilets Jaunes”, says Islam is not Europe’s problem, but European people are Europe’s problem. How weird.

    Erdogan was not specific about what his nemesis, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), has to gain from hijacking a protest over fuel prices 2,500km away from the territorial disputes with the Turkish government, but appeared certain it was involved.
    “The PKK’s branches are there. The DHKP-C (People’s Liberation Army-Front terror group) is there,” he said.

    Erdogan explained that he opposes both the chaos of the demonstrations and the “disproportionate violence” of the French police. However, he ultimately placed the blame on European leaders who “fell in their own ditch,” by blaming migrants and Islam for their problems, failing to recognize the danger of their own people.

    What could Erdogan mean by this?

    I can’t remember European leaders blaming migrants and Islam for their problems. Indeed, European leaders believe migrants and Islam are the solutions to their problems.

  135. “Just move along, transients …”

    Yep, “transients” is the key word there. SJW whites on the victim/savior cycle and their POC allies propagate the notion that American whites have no intrinsic culture; that we should just relinquish the societal and physical infrastructure built through theft, appropriation, and whiteness to the true originators of everything that is green and good on these fruited plains. And like it or not, as newly installed Governor Hollow is wont to say, the POC are eventually going to take it all. Those of the pale hues who are left, will be the servants at their parties. And we all know how the POCs love to party. They’ll be dancing in the ruins for generations.

  136. istevefan says:
    @Jack D

    When my father was a young man in Poland, he would hear anti-Semites chanting , “Jews to Palestine”. Nowadays, they chant “Jews out of Palestine”. You might get the idea that anti-Semites don’t really want Jews anywhere.

    I don’t hear people with my views chanting “Jews out of Palestine”. Rather I see people trying to point out the hypocrisy of American Jews who support policies for Israel that they would consider immoral if enacted by America.

    I recall Sailer had a post some time back where he suggested we come up with a grand bargain. We’d give Israel support, and let her run her affairs as she sees fit so long as the anti-Gentile elements of her diaspora would cease to fight against our interests here.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @Anonymous
  137. Jack D says:
    @istevefan

    Well of course if a “white ruled homeland” is hostile to Jews and doesn’t regard Jews as being entitled to the same rights and privileges of citizenship as “natives” then Jews will be hostile to them and in favor of the party that has a more inclusive view of Jews as fellow citizens. Who wants to be a second class citizen in the country of their birth? We hear all the time here that whites should not want this for themselves, so why would Jews want this?

    If the “bargain” that the alt-right offered was, “forget about all the Emma Lazarus stuff, the brown immigrants who are clawing at our borders are not your friends. You really won’t like it when they are in charge. We regard you as our fellow Americans and brothers and not as the hated “other” – please join our club, our doors are open to you, we value your skills and want you on our side. You can keep your religion – there are no religious tests for being American. There are no “Founding Stock Americans” and “other”, we are all Americans together”, then maybe it would sell. But instead Jews hear from the alt right, “they all have to go back”, Holocaust denialism, denial that there was EVER any anti-Semitism in America, hatred for Israel, accusations of divided loyalty, “hypocrisy”, etc. What Jew in his right mind would NOT be hostile to those who are hostile to him?

  138. @unpc downunder

    What I don’t get is why American white nationalists are always bashing Israel, when the Jews in Israel are the least hostile to white gentiles and populist/nationalism in Europe.

    Are they bashing Israel for being a nation?

    Seems to me the main criticism is that Israel has too much control over US foreign policy.

    Also, the hypocrisy that excuses Israel for things that America is not allowed to do. Like having an ethnic immigration policy and building a wall. (And this isn’t a criticism of Israel per se, but rather the double standard of American Jews and Liberals).

    As a side note, it would be very interesting to see the opinions of Israeli Jews on American immigration policy. Does anybody do polling in Israel about domestic US issues like that?

  139. Rosie says:
    @Jack D

    If the “bargain” that the alt-right offered was, “forget about all the Emma Lazarus stuff, the brown immigrants who are clawing at our borders are not your friends. You really won’t like it when they are in charge. We regard you as our fellow Americans and brothers and not as the hated “other” – please join our club, our doors are open to you, we value your skills and want you on our side.

    Hasn’t that bargain already been offered and rejected?

    • Agree: Buzz Mohawk
  140. @unpc downunder

    I would have no problem with Israel if they acted like a normal nation state, fighting their own battles, paying their own bills, and reciprocating friendship.

    The problem is, the Israeli 5th column in America, the Israel lobby, has dragged the US into endless wars against the enemies of Israel in the Middle East, wars which cost the lives of thousands of American soldiers and trillions of dollars of American taxpayer money.

    The results of these wars have been disastrous for America’s national and civilizational interests. Our Christian brothers in the world’s oldest churches have been ethnically cleansed from the region where Christianity originated, our own homeland and the homelands of our European Christian brothers have been flooded with Middle Eastern refugees, America’s good name has been tainted by humanitarian catastrophes in places like Yemen, and we’ve been brought to the brink of a catastrophic military confrontation with Russia.

    Worse, they’ve corrupted the purity of Evangelical Christianity in America by introducing the Christian Zionist heresy into our churches.

    They are attacking American First Amendment free speech rights via anti-BDS legislation.

    Furthermore, they’ve repeatedly bitten the hand that feeds them, for instance the Lavon Affair, the attack on the USS Liberty, and the Jonathan Pollard spy scandal. Some well respected Israeli thinkers even threaten genocidal military action against our NATO allies – the “Sampson Option”.

    I hope that Israel will learn to be a real nation, but first they must outgrow the hyper-ethnocentrism they learned as a diaspora people. The Virtue of Nationalism is a golden mean between a vice of deficiency (ethno-masochism) and a vice of excess (hyper-ethnocentrism).

  141. istevefan says:
    @Jack Hanson

    Also, watch and see RBG is going to have been functionally dead for the past week.

    If she were one of the conservative justices, the media would be calling upon her to resign. Congress would probably being considering ways to impeach her. The American Bar Association would put out editorials about how she is doing the nation a disservice by occupying one of nine highest judicial seats in the land while not being able to devote anywhere near 100 percent to fulfilling her duty.

    Since its RBG, we get a Hollywood biopic and treatment of her hanging onto office as some sort of heroic effort like a wounded soldier driving on to take the hill. Additionally members of the media are now soliciting the public to give up one day of their useful lives to donate to RBG so that she can continue on the court for another 27 years.

    • Replies: @Peripatetic Commenter
  142. MarkinLA says:
    @Prodigal son

    IF and that is a big IF, Trump doesn’t cave.

    Trump’s real winning strategy is to declare an emergency and “Just build the damn wall” to paraphrase Insane McCain. Nobody would dare stop him and he can stop the government shutdown which make a lot of people happy.

    • Replies: @istevefan
  143. Jack D says:
    @istevefan

    We’d give Israel support, and let her run her affairs as she sees fit so long as the anti-Gentile elements of her diaspora would cease to fight against our interests here.

    Such a bargain is impossible because there is no Pope of the Jews (even if there was one, the answer would be the same – not even the Pope of the Catholics who is a real person could make such a deal on behalf of all Catholics). Many of the Jews who you perceive as fighting against “our interests” are equally hostile to the current Israeli regime. The accusations of “hypocrisy” are just another anti-Semitic slur.

  144. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack Hanson

    Ah. Another iSteve thread about America’s future where the underlying theme by the Boomer/Xer contingent is “Please let nothing happen that affects my reverse mortgage and 50 state RV national park tour please please please nothing that might in any way mess with my standard of living as karmic debt for for the policies my cohort pushed.”

    The future is not smothered to death with a pillow or fantasy land where the Left discovers a charity to dissenting views it has never displayed ever and lets you live in peace while you go on your RV tour.

    The future is war. Either be a fighter or be cattle.

    Jack, you’ve been beating this drum for a while now, and I’m genuinely at a loss for what you’re getting at. Yeah, I get it that we’re supposed to be more confrontational and less passive, but concretely speaking what is that supposed to mean? Those dots don’t connect.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
  145. @Alfa158

    The cultural environment in California is going to get worse with newly-spawned Governor Hollow in charge. Hollow and his creepy, activist wife are self-aware enough to know that they have to throw shade on whites in order to obscure their elite SF Bay Area origins. They will seek to pacify the brown majority any way they can because both desire residency in the White House. So, my fellow non-elite white Californians, prepare for intensified psychological warfare.

  146. MarkinLA says:
    @Jack D

    People complain that Jews are not identifying as white Americans but why would you want join a club where you are made to feel unwelcome?

    Isn’t this a chicken and egg problem? Did Jews once identify as while when they were attacking white America or did they pretend they were something else?

  147. El Dato says:
    @Doug

    Amazingly, you can say Bad Things about Microsoft Windows and boycott Office 365, but you can’t say bad things about Israel (for example that they are bombing the crap out of civilians they keep in a ghetto conditions) or boycott Israeli produce without risking bringing down the wrath of Jehova itself (and possibly of Twitter Jack too)

    You can’t explain that!

    Total pro-Israel lobbying spending (including AIPAC) was $3.8 million in 2018

    A red herring and it’s not even an elegant one.

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48277.htm

    While the American media and Washington are expending substantial energy on the alleged Russian interference in the United States political theatre during the 2016 election cycle, another nation and its American promoters that invest substantially in Washington generally fly under the radar when it comes to political influence-peddling.

    According to Open Secrets, the pro-Israel “industry” has made the following political contributions since 1990 …. 2016: 20 million USD (of which 5 million via the “PACs”)

    Not counted “black ops” to “destroy” non-compliant pols I guess.

  148. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    How Jewish globalist-elites see demographic flooding by mass-immigration. It drowns and destroys the majority goy power. Sea Peoples indeed.

  149. El Dato says:
    @Jack D

    The accusations of “hypocrisy” are just another anti-Semitic slur.

    And thus must not be discussed!

  150. Anon[274] • Disclaimer says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    He is partially right.

    America is a shared idea of the state composed of individuals.

    It is why American nationalism, as it is, is so tied up to its governing institutions in a way no other nationality and nation-state is. You can be against the French Republic and still be considered a Frenchman, you can plot against the Japanese Emperor and while you’d probably lose your life, you wouldn’t lose your nationality; but an American who attacks his or her institutions, from the right or left, is in danger of being considered un-American.

    It is why the written constitution, pace Jefferson and many other intellectuals, was more effective than they would deign. The point wasn’t to organize the state, once and for all, by written command; but to provide a document to in-form the minds and habits of the individuals who were expected to share between each other. Unfortunately, it appears we are well past the point where large pluralities of Americans have no intention of coming to understand the American constitution, and treat it forensically as this extrinsic document to be adhered to literally or done away with completely through ignorance or connivance.

    What Mr.Goldberg and others do by ignoring the shared aspect of it, is to render America a commodity which one comes into possession by hook or by crook. There is an expediency to this, whether it was to justify one’s belonging (say as immigrants reacting to tensions) or as some sort of quasi-messianic social gospel pose against outside enemies (as often used as a rhetorical device in the 20th century against fascist and communist positions). It then becomes this passive, dead thing that can only be divined by clerics and clerks. Now we are in a situation where our lumpenintelligensia are confident that the fact of mere existence (and doing so on any patch of land on this planet) immediately qualifies one for a share of grace in this world and the one to come; they do no blink twice when someone gets off a plane, gets a green card and then becomes an activist within months or years of arriving (like that lady arrested at the Statue of Liberty some months ago.)

    And the irony is that they are opening the doorway for Americans to think of themselves as a nation in the old world sense. The great thing about the constitution is that it provided a system which diverted the energy of police the usual aspects of nationhood (shared language, prayers etc.) away from those passive sort of bonds and into more active ones without discounting them in toto. The effect has been to create a people more resilient in the face of change, and therefore making changes which come in time more palatable and reactions more mild. Nationalism, which must regard changes as a potential threat to its conception, always hold the potential for some terribly destructive reactions. The sort of reactions that men and women amon our chatterers worry about excessively as is.

    Not a good situation.

  151. MarkinLA says:
    @bucky

    I still think that Bush/Rove were right about Mexican immigration and working to convert Hispanics into a GOP voting Bloc

    A GOP that votes for more affirmative action and more welfare paid for by whites to get Hispanic votes. Why exactly am I voting for the GOP again?

    • Replies: @bucky
    , @MarkinLA
  152. El Dato says:
    @Jack D

    When my father was a young man in Poland, he would hear anti-Semites chanting , “Jews to Palestine”. Nowadays, they chant “Jews out of Palestine”. You might get the idea that anti-Semites don’t really want Jews anywhere.

    This sounds like something of a NYT op-ed. Completely made up.

  153. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Captain Tripps

    about 1/3 of the more popularly discussed minority groups (Hispanics, Asians) voted for Trump

    But among their elites, it’s like 20 to 1 against Historic America. The fact that 2/3 of Asians vote Democrats is bad enough. Their elites are totally on the globo-homo train.

    As for Hispanic elites, most are white Latinos and they’re animated by envy and resentment of Anglo Achievement. They will do anything to shame, disgrace, and destroy Anglo-America.

  154. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    From Okies to Opies. People gotta have their drugs.

  155. El Dato says:
    @Jack D

    Unless Palestinians resist violently, they are completely safe.

    Phew lad!

    Stop taking bad 3rd Reich propaganda and dishing it out here, badly overdone.

  156. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack D

    Such a bargain is impossible because there is no Pope of the Jews (even if there was one, the answer would be the same – not even the Pope of the Catholics who is a real person could make such a deal on behalf of all Catholics).

    I’ve made that argument before in other threads. But even if this were possible it’s still a distraction all the way around. Instead of worrying about what the Jews are doing, let’s ask ourselves what we can do.

    Well, we can vote Republican, try to formulate clearly and organize ourselves around American national interest. If we actually did that, the Jews would probably respond appropriately. Jews react much differently towards Palestians, relative to Saudis, relative to Americans, relative to technology/finance professionals, etc, etc. We should spend less time bitching about Jews and get our house in order instead.

  157. MarkinLA says:
    @Jack D

    Many of the Jews who you perceive as fighting against “our interests” are equally hostile to the current Israeli regime.

    The important ones like Schumer aren’t.

  158. El Dato says:
    @Jack D

    Palestinian uprising against the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

    “If Palestinians no longer have the right to cross into Israel, they have no one to blame but themselves”

    Doesn’t make logical sense.

    Look, you people would be more sympathetic if you didn’t try to both cry AND shoot all the time.

    • Replies: @Lot
  159. Moshe says:
    @Anon

    I’m in the mood to fight, I’ve been reading up on the Ukranian Famine under Stalin and my blood started boiling at the sort of goyim (and antisemitic jews) who do what they can to inspire what eventually leads to the persecution and death of… well, me.

    So, I came here and wondered how many articles I would have to Ctrl+F before the word “jew” came up in a comment.

    Luccky me! The sophisticated commentariot here kept me from executing a search beyond the very top article – one that has nothing to do with Jews – all the way down to comment #4. I didn’t read your comment but a momentary phrase-skim presented me with a few pictures of “Zionist” and a conclusion of “white masses with pitchforks”.

    I’m willing to take the risk of being wrong and that your comment wasn’t of the sort expressing and fomenting the kind of mental stance that increases the likelihood that, through no sins of my own, the simple fact of my ancestry would, to your preference, be a danger to me – because I know the sort of comments that end up here on hackneyed subjects and they don’t tend to be trendbreakers. On more innovative posts on rarer subjects there can be great comment threads. Here I doubt and I’m willing to take the risk, just to fight some dumb goy or emotionally perverted jew.

    So here I am.

    JEWS!

    Why are so many of the local rabble here and in ukraine 80 years ago and in Spain 500 years ago, etc so eager to to see Jews as the fault of their circumstances? Because you are dumb or emotiomentally perverted. It REALLY IS that simple.

    Desucing the most relevant matters relating to the Soviet induced famine in the Ukraine (that starved around 100,000 Jews too, despite the aid they received from American relatives and having largely lived in cities rather than on farms) is beyond my ken and most definitely beyond yours but one simple fact is that the news was broken to the literate American public largely by Yiddish speaking American Jews of Socialist bent.

    Try again. Your sort are either or both sickly or stupid but even you can hack this one.

    The Yiddish Literate Jewish American Public was informed about the horrors of this starvation even earlier, through the Yiddish Press (much as would be the case with regard to the Holocaust a decade later), and it was largely these same give-a-damn Jews who brought the matter to the general American Public’s attention, including rhrough a series of heartrending articles by a Forward Newspaper reporter through a series of articles in The New York Evening Journal.

    You know why? Because Jews have had a slightly divergent evolution and therefore end up being the thinkers and noticers and analyzers and influencers and doers in the world.

    Not me, God knows. I’m just enjoying informing you that you are stupid and worthless (due to the unfortunately-created written media “you” includes yourself as the author of your written disseminations, in real life you’re probably just as good a bloke as I, but the medium has changed whom we can honestly call ourselves and it includes you as the disseminator of hatred for people from a particular extended family – mine).

    Whyfore antisemitism?

    Because the rulers of the world are often disliked – both wisely and stupidly – by the non-rulers. If we were honest we would notice that the rulers (what have the Romans ever done for us?) generally do a fairly good job at giving us the sort of lot we claim we want (cheap chicken, bright cellphones and a so-simple-and-safe-you-forget-it’s-there sewage system). Sure they do it for their own sake but, holy f’n hell if the existence of MacDonalds isn’t a miracle as divine as the car or the airplane. And we have all 3!

    Not that there isn’t what to hate and certainly what to envy. Evolution requires that there be such reasons and by golly there are. I never understood people’s quico and terrified denial of Hannity’s trump card accusation when (the very few times I watched him over a decade ago) he would accuse someone of promoting “class warfare”. Particilarly with regard to easily resolved severe unpleasantnesses like needing to work at an unjoyable job for 60 hours a week just so that you CAN enjoy items on the MacDonalds Dollar Menu and a habitation that includes a sewage system, a tad of hatred for those who could resolve your problems or at least envy for those who don’t have them appears logical.

    And identifiable Jews, for evolutionary and many other known and unknown reasons, tend to over-represent among the famous, the wealthy, the literate, the extreme and the interesting.

    And for dumb people like yourself or insane people like the jew-descended writers on this platform, it’s so much SIMPLER to look for and hate/envy “Cohn”s than “rich people”. Most particularly when your national myth includes the brilliant idea that “The Goldbergs Killed God” or that this is “The Land Of Opportunity”. If I’m not rich and it’s not the fault of the rich themselves then whose fault is it? The Jews. All of them.

    Naturally, reality being what it is, the rich, Jews and Not, don’t suffer for their perceived sins. Most of the Jews murdered during expulsions, pogroms and holocausts have been poor. The rich Jews often had the means and connections to escape or pay for safety. Just as, closer to home, one of the most despised Americans Donald Trump managed ro make himself beloved by his former despisers by coming down a golden escalator and in a golden crown declaring himself the champion of the poor. The man who would have been the first to be hanged by the common man was able ro turn himself into a hero of theirs, a transformation impossible for the day manager in one of his casinos or hotels.

    But if we love in the land of the free and the home of the brave where anybody can easily make it rich ny just following the rules (all you need is a good idea or an education!), conscious hatred or envy for the elite (often unwarranted anyway) is blocked by the dissonance that has you ALSO believing rhat you too will soon be rich. Did you know that most Americans believe they will be in the top 5 percentile of wealthy some day? A moral ideology to satisfy ones hatred or envy that includes hating on the wealthy is barred by such beliefs. Hating on “Jews” however is not. It would be easier if Jews were a different color, but seeking out the Goldbergs and simply accepting the ‘theories’ that Hitler, Gaddafi or Beria is much easier.

    Anyway, my point is, F you.

    On an unrelated note, F the internet more. I’m not one of the wealthy or elite (though I hope and believe I will be!) and am ambivalent about the fact of literacy and it’s slutty descendant, the internet. Evolution fashioned us for interactions with people we could see, touch and hear while being seen, touched and heard. Our communication system has gone haywire online.

    I assume the benefits outweigh the negatives by a lot but the negatives are real, stark and unfortunate. I don’t mind a good fight but I highly doubt if atually meeting any of the jew-hatred spreaders online would have led to one rather than to an encounter that is close and empathic and pleasant for all involved.

    Online however (because it sure as hell has become – to varying degrees – part of the identity of many) f the dumb ass antisems who attempt to increase what they would call “jew consciousness” with results negative for me and f even more the emotiomentally masochists born of the tribe who put their jew-enhanced gifts into the same service.

    Hallelujah

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Neil Templeton
  160. @Charlesz Martel

    “Our women are against us, we have lost control of them, and

    We think our biggest enemy are the third world races. Our biggest enemy are our fellow white traitors.”

    Yes, and yes!

  161. Donald Trump is a builder. Part of his legacy will be to have a wall stretching from Gulf to Ocean, encompassing all the waves, and blocking the river that runs below Texas.

    All he needs is to remain strong, and his party will back him on this. The American people will back him.

    All he needs is to remain caringly tough. (Remember him sympathizing with supporters at a rally suffering from the weight of illegals??)

  162. @Hail

    Another possible bargaining chip: That multi-billion-dollar NY-NJ tunnel Schumer dearly wants to get started

  163. Moshe says:
    @Jack D

    I’m not sure how long it will take before Steve lets it through, but check my own response to his. Granted, it’s written while I just came down with a cold and perhaps includes too many ideas in too few words but hopefully it will give you a smile. And furthermore, hopefully it will encourage you to see if you could enjoy fighting, rather than defending, as well. their theories are acceptable to them based on either stupidity or perversion, rational responses aren’t the answer. A lance, and a few moments of surrender to your human capability for sadism, is a better one. Ignore, toy or troll the joo obsessives. reasoning with them is retarded.

  164. @Peripatetic Commenter

    Agree. Everything is about denying Trump a win, even if it is something they would have agreed with had Obama done it.

    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
  165. Anonymous[331] • Disclaimer says:
    @istevefan

    the hypocrisy of American Jews who support policies for Israel that they would consider immoral if enacted by America.

    These days that describes a small (and ever shrinking) number of people. It’s always the same old small set of dinosaurs like Kristol, Boot, and maybe Schumer that get called out around here. In fact, that might be the totality of them. Three people (or thirty even) don’t really justify all of the garment rending that goes on at this website on this topic.

    American Jews can basically be almost divided into two cultural groups now – a smaller but growing group of Orthodox and occasionally secular conservative (politically) people who are fairly nationalist for both America and Israel, and a larger but shrinking group of secular progressives who have no attachment to Israel and are leftist for America. The Venn diagram overlap of nationalist for Israel but internationalist for America is tiny, although it gets wildly disproportionate attention here.

  166. Dr. X says:
    @Jack D

    “Jack D” sounds like he is either Bill Kristol or John Podhoretz…

  167. Moshe says:
    @Jack D

    Beini U’veincha what you say is kinna true on a national level but I’ve recently been to Ramallah and the sense of being in a walled ghetto surrounded by barbed wire is a pretty strong one and certainly causes suffering and humiliation to average sort of people for whom tou can’t help feel bad.

    Also relevant to your comment, that intifada was touched off by the person who lit it, Ariel Sharon when he publicly ascended the Temple Mount while in the opposition, against the wishes of the Israeli Government. He was wise to do so and I myself stayed up all night and went to the mikveh in the off chance that I could ascend unto the mount together with him. I did get to wish him well but his massive securiyy detail successfully ensured that I couldn’t sneak on with him. A shame. But I did get to watch the outbreak of that intifada as I quickly ran up a few hundred stairs to the roof of Yeshivat HaKotel (successfully getting past their lesser security).

    Anyway, just a reminisce…

    • Replies: @Jack D
  168. Hail says: • Website
    @AndrewR

    Software thing has caused some comment bugs; see here.

    Test link

  169. Hail says: • Website
    @snorlax

    Headline, Wednesday morning:

    Trump Announces Ginsberg to be Traded for Wall

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
  170. @Boethiuss

    That the iSteve commentariat is made up of coddled Boomers/Xers who’s chief concern is “muh reverse mortgage”, ergo why there are so many posts from that sector with an obvious yearning for YT to get snuffed out like a match (after they pass on, of course).

    Its mocking their sad sack attitudes and letting anyone not willing to be kulaked (unlike many here) that they ain’t alone.

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
    , @Autochthon
  171. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Hannah Katz

    I can’t find it but about a year and a half ago there was an NPR story out of Minnesota including recordings of a town hall meeting in which a globalist stooge congresscritter consescended to hear nice Minnesotans who had been redpilled against their will regarding Somali personal habits and self control.
    At the climax he wheezes something to the effect of “what do you want me to do about it?”
    Thought experiment: imagine an Anerican politician saying that (in that tone of voice), to Jews. I’m sure that would be possible in the 1900s (assuming there would even be a meeting). I cannot imagine that happening in my lifetime.

  172. Hail says: • Website
    @Boethiuss

    It’s a long long stretch to think that the President’s fiat is just going to bulldoze all those things away

    President Roosevelt literally interned an entire ethnic group by fiat.

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
  173. @Hail

    Personally I think the efforts surrounding keeping RBG alive right now (I’m going to assume until proven otherwise that she is being kept on life support) are so over the top that it makes the circus surrounding Terri Schivao look like another day in Holland.

    Just you watch, the Dems are going to insist RBG is “alive” and you can’t take her seat from her.

  174. MarkinLA says:
    @Anonymous

    The problem seems to be that the intersection in your Venn diagram are all in DC or have somebody there paid to represent them.

  175. Mr. Anon says:
    @Tyrion 2

    No, no, yes, and you evaded the question and missed the point.

    • Disagree: Tyrion 2
  176. @unpc downunder

    Not sure what you mean. Most Dissident Right people that I read or know are quite sympathetic to Israel. I know that I am. We just want American Jews to allow us the same right to form a homeland.

  177. Mr. Anon says:
    @istevefan

    Whereas the notion that commenter “Whiskey” is even a little bit Scots-Irish, as he purports to be, is risible.

  178. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous

    These days that describes a small (and ever shrinking) number of people. It’s always the same old small set of dinosaurs like Kristol, Boot, and maybe Schumer that get called out around here.

    Yeah, it’s hardly anybody at all:

    • LOL: Lot
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  179. istevefan says:
    @MarkinLA

    Insane McCain.

    Why did we not think of that name while he was alive? I can’t believe this is the first time I am seeing it.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  180. @Anon

    Damn. I thought that I gave Jack D a little hell for his hypocrisy. I’m a piker compared to you.

    Well done, sir. Well done.

  181. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack Hanson

    That the iSteve commentariat is made up of coddled Boomers/Xers who’s chief concern is “muh reverse mortgage”, ergo why there are so many posts from that sector with an obvious yearning for YT to get snuffed out like a match (after they pass on, of course).

    Come on Jack, the only one talking about reverse mortgages here is you. So specifically, who’s supposed to be doing what that they’re not doing (in your opinion of course)?

    • Replies: @Hail
    , @Lot
    , @Jack Hanson
  182. @Anonymous

    “The Venn diagram overlap of nationalist for Israel but internationalist for America is tiny”

    I disagree. But assuming for the sake of argument that your characterization is accurate, the folks constituting that “tiny” overlap are unfortunately quite powerful (e.g. Chuckie ‘Guardian of Israel’ [but no border wall for the USA] Schumer).

  183. Boethiuss says:
    @Hail

    President Roosevelt literally interned an entire ethnic group by fiat.

    Well yeah, 1942 was a long time ago. We couldn’t do that now, and not just because of the courts either.

  184. Hail says: • Website
    @Boethiuss

    the only one talking about reverse mortgages here is you

    Google, site:unz.com “reverse mortgages” –> Zero hits on iSteve main blog entry; nine iSteve comment-section hits (2011 to 2017), one hit on a James Petras article’s comment-section; one hit on a Nomi Prins article.

  185. istevefan says:
    @Jack D

    Many of the Jews who you perceive as fighting against “our interests” are equally hostile to the current Israeli regime.

    First, the Jews I perceive to be fighting against “our interests” are most definitely not equally hostile to the current Israeli regime, or to the state of Israel itself. In fact they seem to very staunch supporters of Israel. Who are these Jews about which you refer?

    Second, when you wrote” the”current Israeli regime” that seems like a huge qualification. Are you suggesting that those Jews are only hostile to Likud or Netanyahu’s current government? Or are they hostile to the state of Israel itself?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  186. Boethiuss says:
    @Mr. Anon

    If Mitt Romney were asking for $ 5 billion to build a wall – not that he ever would – but if he were, he would get the same reception.

    Fcuk that sideways. If Mitt Romney were President, DACA would have been gone on Inauguration Day, and of course if he had beat Obama in 2012, there would never have been any DACA in the first place.

    More or less the same people would support a wall, and more or less the same people would oppose it. But if Romney were President, with two Republican houses of Congress, and if he wanted a wall, we would be building a wall.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    , @Mr. Anon
    , @BB753
  187. MarkinLA says:
    @istevefan

    It was quite common. I used it a lot and I am sure I didn’t invent it.

  188. bucky says:
    @MarkinLA

    Hispanics aren’t on welfare. Most illegals are working under the table. It is the legal residents, mainly blacks, who are on welfare.

    Hispanics could be a demographic that is GOP for the right reasons: hard work and family. But a big segment of the GOP has demonized them because it is politically incorrect to criticize blacks.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @MarkinLA
    , @Anon
  189. @Doug

    How much does your hasbara fellowship pay? Your BS reads like it came off a reference card, and it’s wrong, deceptive, and out of date. They need to provide you with better talking points.

  190. MarkinLA says:
    @Boethiuss

    If Mitt Romney were President, DACA would have been gone on Inauguration Day,

    I don’t believe this for one second. Romney stopped talking about immigration once he got the Republican nomination. That may the biggest reason he lost.

  191. @Doug

    So you’re saying that if all Jews were to pack up and leave the USA tomorrow, and in the process liquidate all their assets, then the overall political, economic and social policy of the United States, both externally and internally, would be no different than it has been for the last 30 years and is today?

    I bet that if such an option were offered that very few Jews who would up and leave, even if given fair exchange value for their assets. They know that they occupy a privileged place in America and that they’d be fools to forsake that.

    • Replies: @Doug
  192. @Hypnotoad666

    Why would they want to give up such a good thing and take their chances with a new regime run by Blacks, Hispanics, and Muslim immigrants? All of these groups are vastly more hostile to Jews than Whites are.

    Vengeance.

  193. @Harold

    Two religions, actually.
    Yankee Protestant (New England) believes in sacrificing others for your sins under quite a range of circumstances. Highly influential in corporations and academia.
    Reform Judaism fears that it might have to move to another country yet again, and is willing to sacrifice anybody involved with a possible move. Highly influential in banking and entertainment/media.
    Both groups have lots of money, lots of influence.

    Counterinsurgency

  194. Mr. Anon says:
    @Tyrion 2

    I believe that Israelis should have a nation too. That doesn’t make me an Israeli nationalist, and I am not one. To be an X-nationalist one ought to be, at least, a citizen of X.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  195. Chuck Shomer:

    Posted by Meritocracy on Monday, January 7, 2019

    • LOL: jim jones
  196. @Jack D

    Jack D. You perfectly embody Jewish myopia. Your critique of my comments is prompt and often on target. Your own comment here is just plain stupid or dishonest. More likely, both, given your fellow Jew’s track record.

  197. @Mr. Anon

    His comment reads like hasbara. Maybe it is.

    Thank you for countering his deceptions. I would add that he conveniently left out the SPLC co-founder, Joseph J. Levin.

    I would also add, that in my original comment I left out Hollywood, which is majority Jewish-controlled and has exerted enormous cultural influence approximately forever. I just can’t wait to see the upcoming hagiopic about Ruth Bader Ginsburg… which a sane person would reasonably conclude comes to us now to stoke the fire against Trump’s next Supreme Court nominee when Ginsburg goes.

  198. Mr. Anon says:
    @bucky

    Hispanics aren’t on welfare.

    Nonsense. Latinos recieve all sorts of government assistance. Illegal aliens recieve all sorts of government assistance.

    • Replies: @bucky
  199. Mr. Anon says:
    @Boethiuss

    Who knows what Romney thinks on any given day. He’s an opportunist whose opinions shift with the wind. You are a fool.

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
  200. Anonymous[130] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Most AIPAC supporters are nationalist for Israel and America. Do you even realize who is on the jumbo-tron screen in your photo?

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  201. Lot says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    “You seem quite angry that people bring up the role of Jews in funding and promoting past and current anti-white political policies and cultural changes. Instead of insulting us, why don’t you simply show us where we’re wrong. ”

    What’s the point?

    What percentage of people who want to engage in intellectual debates about Jewish perfidy are open to admitting they are wrong, or have the slightest real-world influence? Convince me I should engage with Ron Unz’s Putinfans, 9-11 Truthers, and now Nation of Islamers.

    Circa 1930, there were definitely a lot of smart and reasonable people who were anti-semites but likely open to reason. Now they are overwhelmingly NAM proles, with likely under 1% of the US population holding anything close to right-wing antisemitic views. Even when such people are not low IQ, they are usually eccentric and self-marginalizing.

  202. @Jack D

    There are founding stock Americans, but how many of us are saying that you are not our fellow Americans? Obviously you are.

    You are conflating our complaints about your group’s disproportionate and self-serving influence with others who, according to you, are hostile to Jews and want you to go back somewhere. These are not the same things, and your comment is yet another example of what makes us mad.

    Sorry. You are in our club. And you can keep your religion, please.

  203. nebulafox says:

    All this ranting over Israel is stupid. If you people really insist on a wall-as opposed to, I don’t know, simply making E-Verify mandatory and cracking down hard on things like remittance money for Carlos Slim-use India instead. India faces illegal immigration on an economic basis from Bangladesh along with Islamist threats, and the borders are more on America’s scale, size-wise.

    Also, India is Democracy of Color. The new, upcoming generation of Democrat is more likely to think of Israel as an apartheid state rather than a beacon of civilization in the Middle East. Much better tool for SJW bludgeoning.

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    , @J.Ross
  204. MarkinLA says:
    @MarkinLA

    Check your stats again. Hispanics use more welfare than whites by a lot. It is true that they usually have jobs but the jobs pay below the poverty line and they qualify for all sorts of welfare as well as Earned Income Tax Credit.

    Without them wages would rise for the working poor.

  205. MarkinLA says:
    @bucky

    Clicked on the wrong button see #191.

  206. @Citizen of a Silly Country

    AGREE. Completely. Excellent reply and analysis.

  207. @Citizen of a Silly Country

    He didn’t say anything other than “Don’t talk about Jewish influence.” Is that what you agree with?

    No I agree that Jews aren’t the answer to every question or the only actors in the drama. Blaming Jews for America’s open border with Mexico is especially dumb. Rich, White goyboys like John McCain and the Bush clan want that border open more than any New York Jews.

    Have gentile whites also been major players? Of course, but Jews have played a major, if not decisive, role in what has unfolded over the past 60 years. Why is that so hard to admit?

    I have no trouble admitting Jews have played a major role in public life and pushing almost all of the bad policies of the last 60 years. I’m just saying they’re not always the decisive faction and often they’re only minor partners in the political coalition pushing policy X or Y. Our own Chamber of Commerce types are happy enough to sell Vancouver to the Chinese, with or without Jewish assistance.

  208. J.Ross says: • Website

    At Vox (bear with me), one hospital decides to be a standalone socialized medicine system, aggressively shaking down middle and working class people to subsidize junkies under the approving watch of a certain tech billionaire. In any country or even any organization communism reproduces the same evils.

    “For us, the challenge is we don’t want to become just another hospital,” he said. “Our mission is to serve people who are underserved because of their financial needs. We feel like we have to recoup what we’re able to from people who are insured because we’re supporting people who don’t have insurance.”

    https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/7/18137967/er-bills-zuckerberg-san-francisco-general-hospital

    • Agree: Lot
  209. bucky says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Examples please.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  210. Boethiuss says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Who knows what Romney thinks on any given day. He’s an opportunist whose opinions shift with the wind. You are a fool.

    Well, you’re a shitty American, and if you think you’re a patriot, then you’re a shitty patriot too.

    • Troll: Trevor H.
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  211. Mr. Anon says:
    @Lot

    You know, you could have just written “F**k you!”.

  212. Mr. Anon says:
    @Boethiuss

    At least I’m not a blustering nincompoop / blowhard like you.

  213. J.Ross says: • Website
    @istevefan

    Jews think they’re fooling God with the centrifugal chickens, Natalie Portman feels assuaged acknowledging feeling conflicted over how her remunerative career started, and the sock puppet on the left hand is supposed to be a separate human being from the one on the right. No one is fooled. I don’t know that anyone is persuaded by online disputation, but we do seem to be seeing a new general skepticism.
    The sound file I wish I could play whenever this sort of thing comes up is either the guy who awarded the victim compensation packages after the destruction of the World Trade Center (you can hear the smile in his voice), or the nominal leader of BLM appearing on NPR and explaining in cartoon lawyer fashion why up is down, or Ezekiel Emmamuel insisting on CNN that no heterosexual Nobel prize winning shotgun marksmen had ever said anything about Obamacare doctor choice.
    Actually, Muslims pull this same garbage (all these claims are infinitely recycled Semitic intertribal defenses and allegations, going back millennia) but they usually fail because they lack the verbal acuity.

  214. Lot says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    There’s about 10 instances in that comment of you presuming to speak for American “gentile whites.”

    Left out is any evidence that people in this group ever think of themselves as “gentile American whites” as opposed to just white Americans. And further, even if that dubious idea were the case, there’s you assumption that if they only “knew the truth” they’d prefer antisemitic WNs to Jews and philosemite conservatives.

  215. @istevefan

    They are going to try to resurrect her tomorrow … I think someone will claim the tomb is empty.

  216. Doug says:
    @Mr. Anon

    > Most Israel lobbyists are not registered as lobbyists or foreign agents. A

    [citation needed]

    > Slim’s stake in the Times was never more than 17%.

    Which still makes him by far the largest individual shareholder, with control of more than a third of the board seats, and the ability to have to handpicked the current NYT CEO (a gentile British Catholic).

    > Turner Broadcasting is owned by Warner Media

    Which in turn is owned by AT&T, whose current CEO is a Scotch-Irish boycott (literally) from Oklahoma, and has never had a Jewish chief in its entire 158 year history.

    > CNN’s current president is Jeff Zucker.

    Oh me, I must have forgot. It’s obviously Jeff Zucker who made CNN left-wing. When Ted Turner was in charge, the station was obviously an American first paleoconservative news outlet. Who can forget the Pat Buchanan News Hour that ran until 2013 when conniving Jeff Zucker took over from noble gentile John Martin.

  217. BB753 says:
    @Boethiuss

    Still got a man-crush on Romney? It took Steve Seiler years of therapy to overcome it but he’s alright now. Don’t let Mormons fool you, they’re globalist and they hate “gentiles”.

  218. Lot says:
    @Boethiuss

    JH used to post a lot of random ad hominems against those of us pessimistic about Trump’s desire and ability to stop US demographic decline.

    That pessimism has been mostly vindicated, though the steady positive steps (most sourced to Jeff Sessions at DOJ) have added up.

    I think a few months ago Hanson read the Turner Diaries and has been really excited since then about hanging all the Jews and Libtards from lampposts.

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
    , @Jack Hanson
  219. Doug says:
    @ThreeCranes

    > So you’re saying that if all Jews were to pack up and leave the USA tomorrow, and in the process liquidate all their assets, then the overall political, economic and social policy of the United States, both externally and internally, would be no different than it has been for the last 30 years and is today?

    Well, sure things would look quite different. A huge proportion of American jobs and retirement assets created in the past 30 years were done by Jewish-founded, Jewish-run and Jewish-funded companies. About a third of American science Nobel Prize winners have also been Jewish. Jews also make up at least one quarter of America’s medical doctors.

    So we can definitely say for sure that a Jew-free America would be poorer, less prosperous, technologically underdeveloped, and less healthy.

    If you’re specifically referring to the political orientation of the United States, and whether we’d have a less ‘woke’ culture and more America first politicians? Doesn’t seem convincing to me. There’s plenty of Western nations with hardly any Jewish population, so that’s pretty instructive. For example, Sweden doesn’t exactly strike me as a “based” “cuck-free”, paleoconservative paradise.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  220. Boethiuss says:
    @Lot

    Well so what if he did, at least that would be coherent. What I suspect is that he hasn’t really thought the matter through in any meaningful way, it just sounds good to talk about Boomer reverse mortgages. But I could be wrong, I really am interested to know.

    • Replies: @Lot
  221. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    It seems to me they have flourished insanely well under the (previously) existing “White Power” regime.

    In Old Europe, Jews were safer in Austro-Hungarian Empire. All goy groups disliked Jews but they also disliked each other. So, they couldn’t unite against Jews. Also, Jews were useful to the Austrian ruling elites because Jews, being more cosmopolitan, could serve as middlemen among all groups. Rise of nationalism led to united national actions against Jews, most radically in Nazi Germany. Granted, Germany became most dangerous to Jews when it went into Imperialist mode and came to rule over diverse peoples. Unlike Austrian rulers, Nazi Imperialists weren’t going to use Jews as middlemen.

    Another thing. If Jews were a Normal People, they would be middle-achievers and just fit into any society. But they are a Great People, and this means they take elite power over nations. Jews become addicted to domination. Elite minorities tend to be nervous because it’s generally not normal for a small group to rule over others.

    Now, it seems as though EU and US don’t mind Jewish power and privilege, but Jewish paranoia can’t help feeling that things will eventually change. So, the only insurance to keep Jewish Domination going is Diversity.

  222. istevefan says:
    @Jack D

    Well of course if a “white ruled homeland” is hostile to Jews and doesn’t regard Jews as being entitled to the same rights and privileges of citizenship as “natives” then Jews will be hostile to them and in favor of the party that has a more inclusive view of Jews as fellow citizens. Who wants to be a second class citizen in the country of their birth? We hear all the time here that whites should not want this for themselves, so why would Jews want this?

    But you know that is BS especially in regards to the USA. Jews were accepted as citizens from the very first days of this republic. Even the Confederates welcomed Jews.

    Additionally the one group of White Gentiles that literally worships Jews and Israel, the Evangelicals, are the ones for whom the Jews seem to have the most vitriol. So how can you convince White Gentiles to be more pro Jewish when you have open hostility and disgust for the one group that showers you the most with love?

    But instead Jews hear from the alt right, “they all have to go back”, Holocaust denialism, denial that there was EVER any anti-Semitism in America, hatred for Israel, accusations of divided loyalty, “hypocrisy”, etc. Wha

    Stop hiding behind this alt-right BS. How long has the alt-right been around? Does the alt-right even have power? Besides, when immigration was blown open in 1965, there wasn’t even an alt-right. The alt-right appears to be a response to 50-plus years of immigration, trade and foreign policy that has not been beneficial for the bulk of the citizenry.

    Throughout the past half century of world record setting immigration, White America has sat back as Jews displaced the dreaded Wasps as the leading group of this nation. They have not tried to prevent Jews from achieving disproportionate success. All the while they have spent enormous sums on Israel, endured a costly boycott over our support in 1973, and participated in multiple wars in the middle east.

    Yet you can’t even acknowledge this with a simple thank you. Instead you come up with some fringe alt-righters as an excuse to say FU to White America because we supposedly aren’t treating you with enough respect.

    Honestly at this point I don’t think there is any more we can do to get your respect. As noted above, the Evangelicals are absolutely detested by the bulk of Jews. And if what White America has done for Jews and Israel over the past century is not enough, nothing will ever be. If the Russians can’t ever be forgiven for their past sins by the deaths of millions in defeating the Nazis, what chance do we have?

    Maybe trying to bend over backwards like the Evangelicals engenders disrespect.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @L Woods
  223. @Jack D

    Short version: Dindu nuffin’ … and you deserve it.

    JackD i hearby award you the honorific: Dinjoo.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  224. Lot says:
    @Boethiuss

    I am not understanding the reference to reverse mortgages either.

    Turner Diaries isn’t too coherent either. How many lampposts are there in America low enough to hang a Jew on?

    Every place I’ve been, they are way too high, except a few small historic districts. The WN will need to commandeer cherry picker cranes as their first revolutionary act.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
  225. Boethiuss says:

    I am not understanding the reference to reverse mortgages either.

    I do know that he’s expressed skepticism toward political change as a useful strategy toward the solution to his complaints. Exactly what his intentions are, I’ve asked him but he hasn’t answered.

    There’s obviously a big difference between Gavin McInnes-style Proud Boys and The Turner Diaries, but it’s not real clear that either one of them would work. What’s more interesting for me, is if Jack does believe that one or the other of them would work (or some third alternative he hasn’t told us about yet), what that would be the case. Again, my guess is that Jack doesn’t know the answer for that himself.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  226. …would be like Motel 6 guests getting to veto future guests in their rooms.

    Or bedbugs. Or roaches.

  227. @Trevor H.

    Why are Democrats furiously trying to replace what’s left of the white race in America?

    Huh? Haven’t you heard of Vermont? Oregon? Chappaqua, N.Y.?

  228. Lot says:
    @El Dato

    Who’s crying? I only see winning!

  229. @Jack D

    Jack this a striking load of b.s. And either you know it’s a striking load of b.s. or you’ve got your head just so loaded up with ethnic resentment–over your dad’s experience in the camps or whatever– that you are unable to be even remotely objective about anything having to do with Jews.

    We have this thing called “causality”. Something causes something else. The future can not cause actions in the past. And the alt-right has absolutely zero to do with Jewish ethnic animus.

    A timeline suffices:

    — As European tribes–Picts, Angles, Jutes, Gauls, Vandals, Huns, etc. etc.–coalesced into simple “the people” of various geographic states, which in turn became larger nation states, the Jews were the one tribe to hold themselves apart and refuse integration, and in fact wrap all sorts of religious sanctions around that refusal.

    — In the US–contrary to your b.s.–Jews have never been “2nd class citizens”. They’ve had all the privileges of citizenship from the get go.

    — What you are whining about is that Jews were not part of the ruling WASP elite. Uh, duh, of course because Jews aren’t WASPs. Is there some sort of moral commandment for any people, much less the people who built the nation to throw down whatever privilege they have and say, no you take it? Uh, no. There is not. (My Irish ancestors weren’t part of the ruling WASP elite either. I don’t find it offensive or unfair … they weren’t WASPs and weren’t integrating to WASPhood. Why should a WASP wrap and arm around them and say “Here, son come meet my daughter.”)

    — This golfocaust whining is particularly repulsive coming from Jews. Again, Jews are people who for 2000 years held themselves separate from other Europeans–a separate chosen tribe. WASPs are their own “race”, with their own language, traditions, religion, culture–different than the Jews. And Jews were at odds with some of those traditions–not just religion. WASPs found lots of Jews–especially the new arrivals–to be loud, pushy, obnoxious. (Jews don’t deny this they celebrate their own character and culture and call it liberating compared to these stiff, “stuffy” WASPs.) WASPs aren’t entitled to say “no I don’t want them in my club, I don’t want them meeting, trying to bed or marry my daughter? It’s pretty ‘effing rich for a group which has steadfastly refused integration and kept itself separate for 2000 years, to whine about some other group, which likes its own traditions and culture wanting to keep separate. In truth, the WASPs were far, far more “open” a tribe than Jews have ever been. Just typical Jewish double standards–tribalism for me, but not for thee. (And yes, Jews still have their own Jewish country clubs–for Jewish ethnic networking and mating–today.)

    — In the 50s, 60s and 70s, the WASP elite basically stepped aside. They meriocratically hired Jews, Catholics and eventually even blacks (less meriocratically) into all the institutions they had built, their universities, companies, white shoe law firms, etc. and even opened up their country clubs essentially to elites (or people with the buyin) of any background. Jews, being smart and aggressive, rose quickly in numbers and prominence and essentially took control of a good portion of American elite institutions.

    How has this act of WASP ethno-cultural openness been repaid by the Jews?

    Basically with extreme rudeness and ingratitude. Hostility. Contempt. Mocking white gentile traditions, religion and culture. Trashing their history and traditions. Tearing down their heroes. And most of all, pushing minoritarianism: minorities good, majorities bad, encouraging dis-integration and flooding the nation with more ethno-culturally incompatible people and encouraging them all to blame and define themselves against whitey.

    This Jewish disparagement of whitey was already well underway in the 70s by the time I was reaching some sort of cultural awareness. It’s something driven by some combination of Jewish self-interest, psychopathy, ethnic solidarity/ethnic animus. To try and pretend it is even remotely gated by alt-right “anti-Semitism”, which is a growing awareness of and reaction to this Jewish behavior a full 30 to 40 years later is just bizarre. “Arrow of time”–causalty does not work this way.

    • Agree: Hail
    • Replies: @Lot
  230. istevefan says:
    @Lot

    Who’s crying? I only see winning!

    So your idea of winning is to make an apostate out of the president’s daughter?

    • Replies: @Lot
  231. @PaceLaw

    Pace Law? Do tell. Haven’t been to White Plains in awhile.

  232. Lot says:
    @Jus' Sayin'...

    Probably on the next site update.

    • Replies: @Moshe
  233. Kyle says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    hmmmm. California where it isn’t 20 degrees farenheit right now. California has the right idea when it comes to weather.

    • Replies: @Anon
  234. Lot says:
    @istevefan

    Apostate? OK Achmed.

    Who cares… you lost Ivanka, but gained….. me! Well technically my pa before I was born, but still a Christian with oven-worthy genes.

  235. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @istevefan

    Fundangelical Christian Zionists are the worst people in the world. They are God-Damned Rapture Bunnies, traitors, heretics and blasphemers.

    If there is a hell they are going to the worst part of it.

  236. @Lot

    The truth is that you can’t show that I’m wrong. However, you’re right. You’re right.

    Gentile whites have gleefully played the part of the patsy. Will we wake up? I don’t know. It certainly doesn’t look good. But a few of us have. Just a few.

    But here’s the thing. Those of us waking us aren’t “eccentric and self-marginalizing.” We’re engineers, corporate executives, blue collar guys. The downside, of course, is that we’re not ethno-pyschos, like certain groups. We’re just regular guys who wanted to live our lives in peace.

    But as Jews have shown, a few dedicated people can make a surprisingly large difference.

    I apologize for wasting your time. It’s becoming clear that our differences are too much to bridge.

  237. Lot says:
    @AnotherDad

    “which is a growing awareness of and reaction”

    You have any evidence of “growth” of right-antisemitism? I highly doubt it. Certainly the ADL hopes to find it, but their evidence is pretty unconvincing.

    I see none myself. More visible in a few dark corners of the Internet, but that isn’t anything new, but was the case in the mid-1990s.

    I don’t think the “intellectual” case for reactionary antisemitism has merit, but their reality is persecuted and nutty freaks, so most people will never view it worthwhile to give them a hearing.

    Best to embrace The Jew. #StrongerTogether

  238. MBlanc46 says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Indeed. At least the other woman had a lot of food on her plate.

  239. Bottom line: If border jumpers were voting GOP by a nine to one margin, Democrats would be building that wall with their bare hands.

  240. @nebulafox

    “As of 23 December 2015 the Government had sanctioned barbed wire fencing of 3326.14 km along the Indo-Bangladesh border. Out of this, 2708.77 km of fencing had been completed. The target for completion of the project was by March 2019. ”

    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/india-bangladesh-fence.htm

  241. MBlanc46 says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    As I have said many times, the Repubs are not our friends. There’s probably no way forward, if there’s a way forward, that doesn’t involve the collapse of the Repubs.

  242. Jack D says:
    @Moshe

    There are many decent Palestinians and I feel bad for them – if they were the majority, they could have made a deal decades ago. The West Bank could have been the Las Vegas of the Middle East – Israelis (and other tourists) could have gone there to gamble, there would have been resort hotels, full employment, prosperity, etc. Wealth far beyond the stupid olive groves they left behind 70 years ago. Israel would have been glad to offer jobs to their Palestinian neighbors instead of importing people from half a world away.

    But there are a large # of Palestinian fanatics who will not accept anything short of pushing the Jews into the sea and are willing to kill themselves so long as they can take Jews with them. So the “good” Palestinians must pay for the misdeeds of the “bad” ones. If they had reined in their own fanatics they wouldn’t have to live surrounded with barbed wire. The same thing was true of the Germans – not every German was a Nazi but the Allied bombs fell on all their heads. If you sow the wind, you will reap the whirlwind and the whirlwind carries away the innocent along with the guilty.

  243. MBlanc46 says:
    @JimB

    You mean some Repub Party in some other possible world? The US Repubs—office holders, donors, and apparatchiks, not people who vote for Repub candidates—are full-bore globalists who want to offshore every job that can be offshored and import a Third Worlder to do every job that can’t be offshored.

  244. @Jack D

    What Jew in his right mind would NOT be hostile to those who are hostile to him?

    What’s funny, in a gallows humor sense, is Jews being hostile to those who are hostile to them, and being hostile in general and those same hostile Jews being outnumbered and unaware of the danger to themselves despite that fact. “Oh, it will be different this time, the goyim are finally tamed.”

    History repeats itself—the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce, the tenth time as sensible chuckle.

  245. @Jack D

    What Jew in his right mind would NOT be hostile to those who are hostile to him?

    But what created that hostility, Jack? Your lack of self-awareness is stunning.

    You may not believe this, but I’m a big fan of the Jewish people, but it’s becoming clear that we’re not meant to be family. That’s not hatred. It’s certainly not a desire that harm is inflicted upon you. I wish you well. I just don’t wish you to be a part of my society because we seem incompatible.

    Ah, I feel better, like getting out of a bad relationship. After you break up, you can’t imagine why you were ever together. We’ll both be much happier apart.

    Of course, my view is almost unimaginably marginal; and yet, and yet, it has a ring to it, a ring that I believe more and more people – Jew, gentile White, black, Asian, Hispanic – will find appealing.

    I wish you – and the Jewish people – the best, Jack – just not at the expense of my people, which seems to be our sticking point.

  246. MBlanc46 says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Explain, then, the phenomenon of white flight.

  247. @Lot

    This is why what little sympathy I have for Palestinians is limited to their Christian minority:


    • Replies: @Lot
  248. This is why what little sympathy I have for Palestinians is limited to their Christian minority:

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  249. @Lot

    Best to embrace The Jew. #StrongerTogether

    I’ll pass on the slow death.

    But, hey, current odds are on your side. On the other hand, history is not.

  250. This is why what little sympathy I have for Palestinians is limited to their Christian minority:

  251. MBlanc46 says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Oh boy, we get to be Brazil or Mexico! Lucky us. Tell you what, Pete, you p*ss off to Brazil or Mexico and leave the US to the descendants of the people who built it. Give my best to Fred Reed, you bag of excrement in human form.

  252. This is why what little sympathy I have for Palestinians is limited to their Christian minority:

  253. MBlanc46 says:
    @John Gruskos

    Well said, JG. I just got angry at his post. You surgically dismantled it.

  254. @Peter Akuleyev

    The percentage of white Americans who would tell their children not to marry someone of Mexican or Guatemalan ethnicity just on racial grounds is probably below 1%.

    I love when someone so clearly shows that they’re an idiot. Saves time.

    What you mean to say is that American whites don’t explicitly show – or even feel – ethnic solidarity. That doesn’t mean that it’s not there. We show it in a million small ways that our fellow whites understand, if only unconsciously.

    The “race replacement” argument works in Hungary or even Germany. It’s a pointless argument in the US and will never gain traction.

    You don’t get out much. Mention that whites will be a minority in the United States in 20 years when chit-chatting with a group of whites and witness their reaction. Naturally, they don’t say anything, but their faces clearly show concern.

  255. @Reg Cæsar

    Sorry, but the EDIT function is acting up. It either erases or duplicates instead of editing properly. Indeed, it was showing me erasure while actually duplicating.

  256. Lot says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Are conditions bad in the small number of Christain towns in the West Bank and Israel proper, as compared to any other group of middle east Christians?

    I don’t think they are, outside of those individuals who throw in with the Muslims and face the consequences.

  257. @Lot

    Left out is any evidence that people in this group ever think of themselves as “gentile American whites” as opposed to just white Americans.

    Well, there’s a never-ending stream of evidence that American Jews very much don’t see themselves as white Americans, which, more or less, guarantees that, sooner or later, I will be speaking for American “gentile whites.”

    Always overplaying your hand.

    • Replies: @Lot
  258. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Boethiuss

    There’s obviously a big difference between Gavin McInnes-style Proud Boys and The Turner Diaries

    Pierce had many outstanding characteristics but was not an especially good writer of fiction. His second novel, Hunter was somewhat better, but it was still not first rate. Both, however were better than the survivalist novels of cuckstain CommaRawles. As compared to Harold Covington’s work, which is of fully mainstream-New York-publishing house quality (though their contents be anathema!) neither is very good.

    According to Pierce’s biographer Robert S. Griffin, Pierce was motivate to write The Turner Diaries after a conversation with Revilo Oliver. (Those interested can easily find Griffin’s book , The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds on the internet for free download: it is quite good.) Oliver had apparently wrote a similar missive himself, and though Oliver’s name appears nowhere on it, the style is unmistakably Oliverian.

    Covington’s novels are particularly good, particularly the first four of the so-called Northwest Quartet-the fifth involves him jumping the shark a little, so to speak.

    Could the revolution be done just as he suggests? No. For one thing, any attempt now to “kick over the old regime” would be stamped out easily and quickly in any area of the country: the prerequisites for a successful revolution are just not available now. The percentage of the population that would be willing to actively support it and the necessary, much larger percentage who might not care either way but will stay quiet and not see what the revolutionaries need them not to see are both radically under where they would need to be. Plus which, the Empire is at its peak strength right now. Any regime that can operate not one, or even two but ten nuclear powered and armed aircraft carriers is for all purposes unstoppable. Plus the strength of Navy, Marine Corps and Army special warfare units and the prospect of conventional or even tactical nuclear strikes from Air Force bombers….all of which would be turned against a Covingtonian racial revolt in full force no matter what previous restrictions have been employed to stop the military from doing its job against illegals and criminals.

    Ah, but: as Baltasar Gracian said, time and I against any two.

    The Republic is dead and the Empire has replaced it in full. And the Empire has already started its ballistic decline: it has terminal cancer. It will die and it will die within the lifetimes of the younger readers reading this. It might be 20 years, it might be fifty. At some point, the breakup of the United States becomes inevitable, revolution or no revolution.

    If they hold their mud and strike hard at the right time could the Northwest American Republic be implemented? Hard to say, but I’m guessing maybe. Failure would mean death for all involved, of course. But if the country is coming apart anyway the chances of breaking off the part you want and getting the people you want in it are quite plausible.

  259. J.Ross says: • Website
    @nebulafox

    Good point — India shoots Bangladeshi border crossers on sight. There is a human rights group outcry, I guess, but it’s never been central.

    • Replies: @nebulafox
  260. MBlanc46 says:
    @Jack Hanson

    Your eyes are brown, right?

  261. Annoyed says:

    The coalition of the fringes will ensure the demise of America. It’s too much of a good thing for them.

  262. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous

    Most AIPAC supporters are nationalist for Israel and America.

    Bulls**t. You can tell yourself that if you like. Nobody else will believe it.

    Do you even realize who is on the jumbo-tron screen in your photo?

    Yeah. A non-entity and a tool.

    Are you claiming that the fact that AIPAC can summon just about any American politician they want for a command performance demonstrates that they are NOT influential?

  263. Mr. Anon says:
    @bucky

    Examples please.

    Screw you. I ain’t your lackey. Look it up yourself.

    You claimed that “hispanics” don’t take welfare – a patent lie – who cares what you think.

  264. Mr. Anon says:
    @Doug

    [citation needed]

    Where were your citations?

    Which still makes him by far the largest individual shareholder, with control of more than a third of the board seats, and the ability to have to handpicked the current NYT CEO (a gentile British Catholic).

    You said “majority”. You lied. You’re a liar.

    Don’t bother with the “we are a small insignificant minority in the media” guff. It’s patent horses**t.

    As I said, you’re a poor liar. The quality of hasbara trolls has declined.

  265. Mr. Anon says:
    @Doug

    Can you at least cite one major Jewish person who’s every said anything close to this?

    Noel Ignatieff. Tim Wise.

    That’s two. And you will undoubtedly say they aren’t “major”.

    But I’ve never heard of anyone advocating multiculturalism specifically as a tactic for winning some sort of perceived Jewish power struggle against white gentiles.

    Who says they would say it? It’s reasonable enough to infer motives from actions.

  266. L Woods says:
    @istevefan

    Maybe trying to bend over backwards like the Evangelicals engenders disrespect.

    Ding ding ding.

  267. @RationalExpressions

    H2h Brazil looks pretty awesome right now.

  268. anon[381] • Disclaimer says:

    “If .6% of the population can lead the remaining 99.4% around by the nose like cattle, you deserve your fate.”

    That’s exactly the kind of Machiavellianism/sociopathy I’d expect from this guy; psychopaths often express contempt for their victims for being stupid enough to fall for their cons. Mr. D is also the one who used the Synagogue shooting to disingenuously claim that he’d just recently come to the conclusion in the aftermath that freedom of speech is bad and that perhaps we should limit it if it’s directed at his ethnic group. I say disingenuous because he spent quite a bit of time lobbying for illegal anti-BDS legislation in these same threads before, so he’d clearly been thinking about this for a long time and was merely hoping to use the sentiment at the time to get something for his ethnic group at our expense. He also tried defending rapist child murder, and ADL mascot, Leo Frank after that devastating Unz piece on the subject. See a pattern here?

    “The West Bank could have been the Las Vegas of the Middle East – Israelis (and other tourists) could have gone there to gamble, there would have been resort hotels, full employment, prosperity, etc. Wealth far beyond the stupid olive groves they left behind 70 years ago.”

    Please. They’ve been stealing Palestinian land for decades. Israel has entire political parties based around stealing Palestinian lands. None of that was ever a possibility. Your entire comment is one long justification for Israel’s misdeeds by means of victim blaming. Your passionate attachment to that country is disturbing, but also illuminating for those willing to observe.

    “Israel would have been glad to offer jobs to their Palestinian neighbors instead of importing people from half a world away.”

    Ahahahahahahahah

    “But there are a large # of Palestinian fanatics who will not accept anything short of pushing the Jews into the sea and are willing to kill themselves so long as they can take Jews with them.”

    Jews have probably killed between 3 and 5 times the number of Palestinians as the other way around. And it’s not the Palestinians pushing Jews off their lands, buddy. The ethnic animus and venom dripping from your comments is nearly overpowering. Like the rest of your co-ethnics, you dehumanize your victims with preposterous delusions of supposed imminent destruction in order to justify your horrible actions. Despicable.

    “So the “good” Palestinians must pay for the misdeeds of the “bad” ones.”

    Spoken like a true psychopath. You’re a credit to your race, sir. That Kevin MacDonald theory is looking better by the day. The fundamental difference between gentiles like us and people like yourself is that you’re a bunch of ethnocentric psychopaths.

    “If they had reined in their own fanatics they wouldn’t have to live surrounded with barbed wire.”

    Translation: if they had just accepted their place at the bottom of society and let us steal their lands and oppress them we wouldn’t have to oppress them.

    “The same thing was true of the Germans – not every German was a Nazi but the Allied bombs fell on all their heads. If you sow the wind, you will reap the whirlwind and the whirlwind carries away the innocent along with the guilty.”

    Oh, get out of my country. Israel awaits. Take your entire race with you. And don’t kid yourself, either. Jack D and the like are not our friends. He’s only here because he perceives the place as being slightly more friendly to his ethnic group than the BDS left (which is probably true). But he’d still place a knife in between your ribs just as soon as he thought it would do his group well. We don’t need allies like that.

    Perhaps one of the few good things that will come from the Balkanization of the United States is the diminishment of Zionist political power, especially in regards to Israel. Of course, you should never count these people out, but I’d still be willing to assert that the writing is still on the wall nonetheless considering the demographic trends. As it is now, UN Security counsel votes regularly run something like 15 – 1 against Israel. What do you think will happen when some BDS democrat gets the White House? I will enjoy that day when it occurs.

  269. Mr. Anon says:
    @Doug

    White supremecism bad. Jewish supremecism good.

  270. anon[381] • Disclaimer says:

    “Are conditions bad in the small number of Christain towns in the West Bank and Israel proper, as compared to any other group of middle east Christians?”

    Things are bad for Christians throughout the Middle East because Zionists and their allies have supported the destruction of the various countries they reside in – Iraq and Syria most notably.

  271. anon[571] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Doug says:

    Fox is founded and controlled by Rupert Murdoch, a WASP from Australia.

    According to Murdoch himself, he’s half Scottish on his father’s side, he converted to Roman Catholicism about 40 years ago, and his mother was a jew.
    All in all, no WASP there.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  272. @Boethiuss

    See, this is one more reason why no one takes you seriously: either you’re being purposefully obtuse here (and disingenuous) or you’re so autistic you’re unable to grok that “reverse mortgages” and “RVs” are anti boomer rhetorical shivs.

    Either way, not a good look!

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
  273. Mr. Anon says:
    @AnotherDad

    Short version: Dindu nuffin’ … and you deserve it.

    Some Jews – a lot, seemingly, at least on boards like this – one might call them Jewish supremecists – seem to have a point of view that is a mirror image of holocaust deniers.

    Holocaust Denier: There was no holocaust and, anyway, they had it coming

    Jewish Supremecist: There is no jewish exploitation of gentiles and, anyway, you’ve only yourself to blame when we exploit you.

  274. @Lot

    Lot I’m not shocked you’re finding common cause with the other “I’m quitting iSteve FOREVER” eeyore on here.

  275. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    But there are a large # of Palestinian fanatics who will not accept anything short of pushing the Jews into the sea and are willing to kill themselves so long as they can take Jews with them. So the “good” Palestinians must pay for the misdeeds of the “bad” ones. If they had reined in their own fanatics they wouldn’t have to live surrounded with barbed wire. The same thing was true of the Germans – not every German was a Nazi but the Allied bombs fell on all their heads. If you sow the wind, you will reap the whirlwind and the whirlwind carries away the innocent along with the guilty.

    When the cattle revolt and use the same logic in applying the pitchfork liberally to the tuchis of Jews, something tells me you won’t be quite as understanding.

  276. Mr. Anon says:
    @Lot

    I guess guns are good for Israelis. For Americans, eh, not so much (see question 36):

    https://www.ajc.org/news/survey2018

    Questions 33, 34, and 35 are also instructive.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  277. @Whiskey

    Revolt of the elites. Jews in elite circles just surf the wave. They are as relevant as a piece of driftwood in a rip current.

    Manischewitz, this is even dumber then your the-whole-problem-is-white-girls-wanting-dark-meat shtick.

  278. @istevefan

    Well said istevefan.

    JackD’s repeated assertions that Jews haven’t had a dominant role in pushing the destruction of the American nation, through minoritarianism, diversity worship, multiculturalism, anti-traditionalism and immigration boosterism is intellectually laughable.

    And his imputation that it’s white people or alt-righters who are the problem when they notice Jewish misbehavior rather than Jews who need to fix their behavior is morally ludicrous.

    There are crappy, useless and treasonous people of all stripes. But as a group, it is Jews, not white gentiles, who have massively failed the “do you want him in your foxhole” test.

  279. Schrödinger’s Wall: MS-13 exists equally on both sides until Chuck and Nancy tell us which collapse of the wave function puts us on the right side of history.

  280. @Lot

    Lot, you are third biggest anti-prophet here, right behind Boethiussss and Whiskey.

    You regularly made eeyore doooooooom predictions that were never fulfilled, and then ignored you ever made them, arguing Talmudically. You literally ragequit iSteve after getting bullycided over Israel, only to come back pretending, as is your wont, you never quit in the first place.

    But please, do go on with this new aggressive embracing of “I’m too autistic to understand rhetoric” schtick.

    • Replies: @Lot
  281. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Mr. Anon

    You didn’t read my original post even close to properly.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  282. @Autochthon

    Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch, Walt Disney, and George Lucas are gay?

    Who knew?

    • Replies: @anon
    , @BB753
    , @Autochthon
  283. @anon

    A friend of mine who is a retired big time corporate attorney and former member of parliament in Melbourne is really annoyed by the myth that Rupert Murdoch’s mother was Jewish. He’s friends with the Green family, went to her funeral when she died at 103. He says that his people, the British, invented being a press lord and are really good at it.

    • Replies: @anon
  284. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kyle

    It’s freezing here in S California. I have to close my windows around 4/30 in the afternoon and sleep under blankets at night. Terrible horrible

    I even had to wear s sweatshirt when I walked to the post office today it was so cold. But at least I don’t have to call the gas company to turn on the furnace.

  285. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    I read the Los Angeles Jewish Journal every week. I read other Jewish community publications. If anyone wants to know what Jews think of the White goyim, just read the online edition of your local community newspaper.
    Speaking of walls, I just drove past that Jewish private school on Olympic Saturday. It’s got a solid concrete block wall 16 ft high with razor wire. There armed guards at the locked gate.
    All this in the safest lowest crime area of the city of Los Angeles. The guards aren’t armed with handguns either. Some kind of small compact rifle that’s openly displayed.

    But the Jewish journal is against a border wall 150 miles away on the Mexican border.

    Anyone who thinks Jews don’t hate the White goyim should just start reading their own local publications

    • Replies: @Jack D
  286. Moshe says:
    @Lot

    A lot of people won’t recognize Bolsonaro. Those who do will wonder why he is wearing a Yarmulka.

    I can answer that question because I recognize the background. If I am not mistaken it is the shul in Rio de Janeiro. I was a speaker there as well, during the World Cup in Rio. Pictures available upon request (requester-dependant). Also a video of me at the world cup final in Maracaña shout-singing at the celebrating drunk germans (on key) “deutschland! deutschland UNTER alles! unter alles in der velt!”) I was rooting for Argentina. [The rest of the spectators in the stadium were for the germans, both because the Brazilians hate Argentinians worse than the Germans who had just humiliated them with a 6-0 knockout in their own country and because Germans have much nore expendable cash (than Argentinians, enough to make up for the proximity difference, such that the stadium was given over to the Alemans (who could afford to biy scalped tickets to the game for an insane €20,000) whilst the Argentines (a happier group of humans) were relegated to the free jumbo screens on Copacabana’s beach. Needless to say, I woke up late enough in the day that the game had already begun, mozied over and got in for free. I’m no good at asking for and receiving things I need – like money from the synagogue in Rio where I was a keynote lecturer and neglected to ask to get paid – but very good at magically receiving things I don’t need, like a series of scary soldiers, police and “others” letting me through to get into the game while actual television reporters with dubious passes begged for the same allowance and were denied.]

    As for your top photo, in private I can tell you of my involvement if you wanna talk by phone but I’d best leave it out here. Suffice it to say, I get a warm glow from all of the antisemitic suffering online every time they angerwhine about “hasbara”. You’re welcome f’ers 🙂

    • LOL: Lot
  287. istevefan says:
    @Doug

    I don’t know the timeline of when Ted Turner was actively involved in CNN, but they most surely featured Pat Buchanan as a co-host of the very popular show ‘Crossfire’. In fact that is where I got to know about Pat and his views. No way that happens on CNN today.

    • Replies: @Doug
  288. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Doug

    Susan Sontag Abe Forman Soros. We let Foxman and Soros immigrate and look how they repaid us.

    They’re no different from Emma Goldman, Alexander Berkowitz the Hammer family Trotsky Leon Czologz* and the rest of the Russian Jews who invaded America with the sole intention of fomenting a communist revolution 1880 to 1935.

    They weren’t fleeing pogroms and Cossacks either. They were dodging the draft. As part of the Russian reforms Jews were granted many civil liberties. But with them came civic responsibilities such as paying taxes and being subject to conscription like every other male citizen of Russia and Russian territories such as Poland.

    For Jews, conscription is the work of satan. The chosen people can never degrade themselves by submitting to the authority of a goyim draft board and associating with the unclean animals or actually fighting for a goyim army.

    That’s the sole reason for the mass migration to America. And they brought communism to America. CPUSA was a Jewish immigrant organization. It’s language was Yiddish until Stalin realized that a Yiddish speaking organization would not succeed in an English speaking nation and ordered the CPUSA to start speaking and writing in English.

    * Leon Czolgz communist Jewish immigrant associate of Emma Goldman and the rest of the communist Jews who repaid America for letting that piece of wretched refuse in by assasinating our president

    If you feel like delving into federal and state data bases, take a good look st the clerk’s lists of attorneys on the anti White side of every school desegregation and school bussing case going back to Brown vs Topeka then every affirmative action case then to the cases that overturned state anti affirmative action referendums.

    Back when I was seriously planning individual direct action I looked at those lists of plaintiff and respondents attorneys.

    Roughly 90 to 100 percent of the attorneys on the anti White side had obviously Jewish surnames.

    I’d like to note that the very first move Hitler made against Jews was affirmative action for non Jews and discrimination against Jews in employment

    Since Jews can’t distinguish among all us us blue eyed devils I must assume that the Jewish imposition of affirmative action discrimination against us is a form of revenge for what Hitler and the Nazis did to the Jews during WW2.

    Here’s just one of many egregious examples of how utterly totally Jewish school desegregation and bussing was

    All the Brown vs Topeka attorneys but the well trained and rehearsed actor Thurgood Marshall were Jews.

    The plaintiff was not a black child desiring to attend a White school. The plaintiff was not a black parent wanting his her child to attend a White school.

    The plaintiff was Esther Brown a Jewish attorney who was neither a child nor parent of a child in the Topeka school district. How the judges granted her standing to sue the district is impossible to understand. It went against every precedent procedure and judicial rules.

    It’s not Jewish control of entertainment and newspapers that set the stage for the destruction of Whites.

    It’s affirmative action which was and is a Jewish weapon against us goyim. It’s one of the weapons Hitler used against the Jews.

  289. You know, Corvinus isn’t the only Corvinus.

    A thread about the Wall, a few well-placed comments about anti-Semites and Israel, lots of people bite, and all of a sudden the thread isn’t about the Wall any more.

    “As an iSteve comment thread grows longer, the probability of most of the additional comments involving Jews or Israel approaches 1”

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @Bill Jones
  290. Moshe says:
    @Jack D

    Unfortunately this comment was the first one that Steve allowed through. Do a Ctrl+f for my name and you’ll see the comment that I had actually written earlier. I’m not an apologist to the antisems, just sharing what I know about the situation of the Palestinians in Yehuda v’Shomron from a lot of first hand experience and how it is the sort of subject that has no black/white or right/wrong. Aside for wanting casinos in or around Israel (or anywhere) I agree in the generality with what you are saying but having lived in and visited Jewish villages in the west bank as well as Arab ones in both the west bank and Israel, I can relate quite well to all involved. Israel should have expelled all the JordGyptians further into the countries of those aggressing nations right after those nations lost the 6 day war they had begun by attacking from the west bank and the golan and sinai etc. But Israel stupidly didn’t. In victory magnanimity and all that. And now you have a horrible situation that I can viscerally relate to. Yes, Ramallah deserved what they got after ripping apart and defenstering 2 Jews who made a wrong turn, but that was a while ago and a new generation is born into a walled and barbed wire ghetto. A new generation that includes thousands of regular doctors and pharmacists and store owners and moms just going about their 21st century life with all the same emotions you and I have. It sucks.

    People are people.

  291. @Jack D

    Sorry for the oversight. Black women are destroying America.

  292. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @bucky

    Many of the men aren’t on welfare. But their women and children are and the men live in the welfare household on food stamps, the welfare cash benefits the low income reduced cost for utilities
    ($17.00) a month gas and electricity free Obama phones and the free food at the food banks which they load their cars with and sell.

    How do you think all those poverty stricken pieces of wretched refuseanagr to send 30 billion a year to Mexico?

    63 percent of all immigrants are on welfare. It’s not just Hispanic children either. The Indians and Chinese bring over the old people. As soon as they turn 65 the family unification are entitled to and get SSI although thru never put a penny into social security Medicare medi caid free senior transportation the food banks free senior lunch free meals on wheels and whatever they can find.

    2 or 3 65+ family unification immigrants bringing in $800.00 a month SSI cash apiece plus all the free food which they usually sell is one of the reasons why Asian and Indian household incomes are so high

    The old people don’t really need to be 65 to be entitled to SSI. All they need to do is present their Chinese or Indian passport and it’s accepted that they are 65. Investigation is forbidden

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  293. Anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:
    @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    This comment can be read several ways.

  294. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    You are very hostile to us.

    Your father’s gratitude to us for saving him and allowing him to emigrate didn’t pass on to you did it? How long was your father grateful? A couple years at least I hope. Or did he join the chorus of Jews blaming Roosevelt and Churchill because they didn’t charge in and save the Jews from Hitler in 1933?

  295. anon[571] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Humphrey McQeen, in his book, A Paper Prince, said that Murdoch was known as Rupert the Chick in Adelaide during the 1950s.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  296. @Anon

    “the free food at the food banks which they load their cars with and sell”

    Ten years ago there were big floods in Gloucestershire, UK which took out the water supply to hundreds of thousands of people for months. Local authorities immediate response was to buy pallets of bottled water and leave them at street corners for people who lived nearby to take. Asian families were then seen loading the water (far more than any household could need) into vans – presumably to sell in their shops.

  297. @anon

    Isn’t Rupert currently married to Mick Jagger’s ex-wife Jerry Hall? Jerry’s not exactly non-binary:

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
  298. anon[571] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Okay, but I don’t see what his problem with that myth is.
    I mean, if people were saying she was an Abo, I could understand. There’s nothing wrong with being called a jew, though, is there?
    Rupert Murdoch had 3 sisters, and I think they all married jewish blokes, so Dame Elisabeth couldn’t have been too worried about it.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @Jack D
  299. @anon

    My friend, who is an ultra-Brit Aussie, feels that it denigrates his ethnicity for ill-informed people to assume that Rupert Murdoch couldn’t possibly have clawed his way to the top of the media pyramid without being substantially Jewish.

  300. @Steve Sailer

    Here’s the 2016 Rupert Murdoch-Jerry Hall wedding. Guests appear to be mostly old guys who have reached a point where they don’t really care anymore, like Michael Caine and Tom Stoppard.

    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
  301. BB753 says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Walt Disney and George Lucas are widely rumored to have liked ’em young. There was a blind item recently on the Crazy Days and Nights website about Walt Disney and Annette Funicello.

    https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/01/blind-items-revealed-39.html

  302. @Jack Hanson

    The University of Georgia report adults ages sixty-eight to seventy-nine have a seventy-eight per cent likelihood of having a home equity conversion mortgage.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
  303. Anon[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Moshe

    Jewish Power may have to be defeated in order for sane Jews to lead the Jewish Community.

    Germany and Japan had to be defeated in order for sane Germans and Japanese to rule those nations. The defeat cleared away the insane Germans and Japanese so that sane Germans and Japanese could emerge and take control. But prior to the defeat, even sane Germans and Japanese had no choice but to serve the insane Germans and Japanese. (Also, even sane and good people are drawn to power and serve it even when it is morally dubious. Consider how Albert Speer, not a bad guy, who was sucked into Hitler’s circle and ended up doing great evil.)

    Today, insane Jews have control over the Jewish Community. They are messing up the world in EU, US, and Middle East. They are globo-homo hegemonists and Neocon Zionist Supremacists. They believe sacrificing any number of goyim is justified on basis of “Is it super-great for Jews?”

    Because these insane Jews are so dominant, even sane Jews mostly go along with them. Insane Jews must be defeated in order for sane Jews to take control and lead the Jewish Community.

  304. Jack D says:
    @Anon

    Gee, I don’t know why they have armed security at a Jewish facility. It’s not like white nationalists are shooting up synagogues or anything. It’s not like the President of United States has suggested that they do so…

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/27/politics/trump-jba-death-penalty-pittsburgh/index.html

    I have no idea why an elementary school would need armed security in a safe neighborhood.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @AnotherDad
  305. Jack D says:
    @anon

    The problem is that it is false and that it plays into the myth that the Joos control the media. When you ask for examples you get Murdoch (not Jewish), the Sulzbergers (Episcopalian), Katherine Graham (Episcopalian), etc. maybe mixed in with a few actual Jews.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  306. Anonymous[137] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Why do you think that it is damning that Israeli Jews and American Jews feel differently about guns? Of course they would, given the different circumstances that they live in.

    • Replies: @bjondo
    , @Mr. Anon
  307. Doug says:
    @Autochthon

    Amazingly even just a cursory spot-check of that graphic reveals obvious inaccuracies, out of date information, and glaring omissions.

    * Anne Sweeney is a regularly practicing Catholic.
    * CBS News’ president in 2013 was (Episcopalian) David Rhodes, not Leslie Moonves.
    * John Skipper is a Southern Baptist.
    * Holly Bario is an Episcopalian.
    * (Presbytarian) Fred Ryan. was the president of WaPo in 2013, not Donald Graham (who’s 3/4 Lutheran anyway).
    * The owner of WaPo in 2013 was (lowborn rural white) Jeff Bezos, not the Graham family.
    * Gordon McLeod is Irish Catholic, was never the president of WSJ (just the head of WSJ Digital Network division), and left the company in 2010.
    * The chart completely misses the biggest media company in the world, Netflix, who’s CEO, founder and chairman is an Episcopalian former marine.

    And that’s literally what I immediately recognized just by looking at the first half of the first column. Here’s a tip kids. Don’t get your information off of unsourced poorly made JPEGs that you find on /pol/. Now, let the grownups have the room.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  308. Doug says:
    @istevefan

    Pat Buchanan was hired for Crossfire by (Jewish) CNN executive Reese Schonfeld. (Gentile) Ted Turner vehemently objected but Schonfeld already signed the contract. Turner immediately fired Buchanan in 1992 once his contract was up. Crossfire was later brought back with paleoconservative Newt Gingrich by (Jewish) CNN president Jeff Zucker in 2013.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossfire_(U.S._TV_program)

    • Replies: @istevefan
    , @Mr. Anon
  309. istevefan says:
    @Doug

    Your summary is somewhat deceitful.

    Pat Buchanan was hired for Crossfire by (Jewish) CNN executive Reese Schonfeld. (Gentile) Ted Turner vehemently objected but Schonfeld already signed the contract.

    Your description implies Turner had a problem with Buchanan. But according to your wiki link, “CNN’s owner, Ted Turner, objected to their hiring but Braden and Buchanan,…” In other words Turner objected to the hiring of both Braden and Buchanan. Braden of course was a very liberal man. So we don’t know why Turner objected. Maybe he did not like Buchanan. Maybe he did not like Braden. Maybe he did not like the format of their show.

    Turner immediately fired Buchanan in 1992 once his contract was up.

    Not quite. Pat Buchanan decided to run for the GOP presidential nomination in 1992 and left the show.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @Reg Cæsar
  310. @The Germ Theory of Disease

    If America is really only an idea, then let’s just write the idea down on a piece of paper and mail it to Mexico, Honduras, India, Africa, Pakistan and China. Then they can read it, and if they like the idea, they can re-constitute America in their own countries, no need to take all the trouble of coming here. Win-win!

    Well said. Every conservative/nationalist should have that tucked into their belt. And every conservative/nationalist politician should pull it out and fire it when this “America is an idea” or “America is a ‘nation of immigrants’” pap is spewed.

  311. We don’t need no stinkin’ wall!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  312. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack Hanson

    See, this is one more reason why no one takes you seriously: either you’re being purposefully obtuse here (and disingenuous) or you’re so autistic you’re unable to grok that “reverse mortgages” and “RVs” are anti boomer rhetorical shivs.

    Well yeah, that’s kinda the point now, isn’t it Jack? A rhetorical shiv and 80 cents is worth a donut at 7-11. And you say people aren’t taking me seriously. LOL.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    , @Mr. Anon
  313. @Boethiuss

    So autism it is, huh? You’ll have to change your name a third time here soon enough to try and erase your shameful posting career yet again if you keep it up?

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
    , @Mr. Anon
  314. Mr. Anon says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Yes I did, you nincompoop. Stop projecting your inability to understand what other people write on them.

    • Troll: Tyrion 2
  315. @Autochthon

    A boomer’s first troll in response to an on the nose observation of their habits goes about as poorly as expected.

    You should probably just sit back and watch the Jews in this thread go to work regarding how they deal with apt observations about a group’s habits.

    • Replies: @Autochthon
  316. bjondo says:
    @Anonymous

    Why do you think that it is damning that Israeli Jews and American Jews feel differently about guns?

    they feel the same.
    guns, bombs, missiles, more,
    for israel.

    jew is jew.

  317. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jack D

    Then why do they have no idea why the rest of us would want a wall?

  318. Mr. Anon says:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Or – another way of looking at it – one guy mentions Palestine, and all of a sudden a few people steer the whole thread in the direction of their own parochial interests. And then claim that everyone else is “obsessed” with them.

    Because no criticism – not the smallest amount – not even on a (relatively) obscure website – can ever be tolerated. Ever.

  319. Mr. Anon says:
    @Doug

    Gosh – and is there any meaningful distinction between Pat Buchanan and Newt Gingrich?

  320. Mr. Anon says:
    @istevefan

    @Doug

    Your summary is somewhat deceitful.

    More like “completely deceitful” – as is, apparently, everything he writes.

  321. Mr. Anon says:
    @Doug

    The co-founder (and first CEO) of Netflix is Marc Randolph, but you just naturally happened to leave him out of it, didn’t you?

    And, here are some more facts for you to ignore:

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/who-said-jews-run-hollywood/

    Now, tell us how The Times of Israel is an anti-semitic publication.

    By the way, what fraction of the US Supreme Court are MOTs? The US Senate? How does that compare to their representation in the population as a whole?

  322. Mr. Anon says:
    @Boethiuss

    And you say people aren’t taking me seriously.

    That’s right, we aren’t. Because you’re not.

    And if you think reverse mortgages are an unimportant topic or somehow irrelevant to what’s going on in America, then you are even more the fool then you normally appear to be.

    Why don’t you just stop wasting time here and go volunteer for the Mitt 2020 campaign.

    You won’t be missed.

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
  323. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous

    Why do you think that it is damning that Israeli Jews and American Jews feel differently about guns? Of course they would, given the different circumstances that they live in.

    The murder rate in America is over twice that in Israel. So why would Americans be less justified in wanting to own guns? Anyway, the point is not the difference between American and Israeli Jews’s attitude toward guns. It is about the difference in attitude of American Jews towards gun ownership in America vs gun ownership in Israel. The former is “problematic”, whereas the latter is seemingly never questioned and even triumphantly extolled, as it was above by commenter “Lot”.

  324. Anonymous[343] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jim Don Bob

    Is that actually Pelosi’s house? I don’t think any private residence in SF looks like that.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  325. @istevefan

    So we don’t know why Turner objected. Maybe he did not like Buchanan.

    It’s said that everyone who actually meets Buchanan does like him. It’s hard to see why Turner wouldn’t, unless he hadn’t ever come in contact. They could have swapped Civil War stories.

  326. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack Hanson

    Jack, I don’t know how this isn’t computing for you but I’m proud of my posting history here. I don’t always agree now with everything I wrote then but I’m not hiding from any of it.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
  327. Boethiuss says:
    @Mr. Anon

    And if you think reverse mortgages are an unimportant topic or somehow irrelevant to what’s going on in America, then you are even more the fool then you normally appear to be.

    Reverse mortgages could be relevant to any number of things, but not here. Like Jack said, it’s just a stick to hit The Boomers with (I’m not one). RV’s too!

    Why don’t you just stop wasting time here and go volunteer for the Mitt 2020 campaign.

    I might. And if I do, whatever I might disagree with Senator Romney about, at least the people I’d be associating with are actual patriotic Americans, instead of nasty anti-American shitbags like Mr. Anon.

  328. Lot says:
    @Jack Hanson

    Link to supposed false predictions of doom?

    In reality, I posted multiple specific predictions that I had money on and won.

    “Rage” is not an emotional state I feel here either.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
  329. Lot says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    “Well, there’s a never-ending stream of evidence that American Jews very much don’t see themselves as white American”

    ???

    You mean random navel-gazing far leftie online essays? Yeah that’s some evidence.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  330. @Lot

    There’s about 10 instances in that comment of you presuming to speak for American “gentile whites.”

    Left out is any evidence that people in this group ever think of themselves as “gentile American whites” as opposed to just white Americans. And further, even if that dubious idea were the case, there’s you assumption that if they only “knew the truth” they’d prefer antisemitic WNs to Jews and philosemite conservatives.

    Lot, you’re usually more perceptive. Silly’s comment is a particularly good one and dead on.

    You point is true, but you’re actually missing the critical dynamic that it points to:

    Actually American whites generally think–or at least thought–of themselves as simply “Americans”. That’s the default mentality of white gentiles. We explicitly are not a tribe like Jews or Gypsies, but are just “the people” who inhabit a particular place\nation. (Be it England or Ireland or France or Germany or the USofA.)

    Now, with the explicit racialism/minoritarianism of the last 60 years, all the attention focused on “Civil Rights” and blacks, and growing ethnic diversity white Americans are more likely to think “sure i’m a white American”. In other words, explicitly separate themselves from blacks who have gotten lots of attention, and more generally no longer think of themselves as “normative”.

    But every time one of these Jews pops up and
    — gives spews some tikkun olamy b.s.–the comedy routine where Jews pretend Judaism is about universal values and chock full of Martin Luther King content of your character–
    or
    — engages in “nation of immigrants” sentimentality, demands open borders and bad mouths native Americans
    or
    — blathers on about the golfocaust or Harvard quotas (demands Americans acknowledge their terrible anti-semitism like JackD was doing yesterday)
    or
    — whines about “the rising tide of anti-semitism
    then, yes, in fact the gentile “white American”, sees a bright line being drawn–the same as was with blacks–and thinks about himself a little bit less as a “white American” and a little be more as
    a “gentile white American”.

    ~~~

    This isn’t really very complicated stuff. The cultural “weather” can be nationally integrating or disintegrating.

    For the 40 years of immigration closure–which included the depression and the War–the cultural weather was *very* integrating. More and more Americans of whatever background saw themselves more and more as unhypenated Americans. Even Jews at least appeared to be headed that way. And some progress was starting to be made on black white relations–which are of course very difficult because of the wide racial gulf in genes and culture.

    Then with the rise of the Jews the “cultural weather” radically shifted with Jewish minoritarianism. Minorities were good and virtuous–majorities bad and oppressive. Blacks were–most unwisely–encouraged to be authentically black, reject white norms and not take any shit from the man. All minorities were encouraged to be not just proud of their roots, but reject thorough assimilation and hold themselves apart as hypenated Americans. And–most importantly–cracking open the immigration floodgates to diversify America.

    But while this was aimed at balkanizing and deconstructing a coherent American nation–and was quite, quite successful–the whole hypenated-American thing did not crackup the white American identity. While whites are often aware of their European ethnic background(s), they just think of themselves as “white Americans”. They–unlike Jews–aren’t all obsessed with their ethnic separateness and think of fellow whites as … fellow whites. The main division is the class one, between white fellow travellers aping the Jews resentments and following their latests fashions to virtue signal their exquisite good-whiteness, and the majority who just see themselves as white Americans.

    As America further diversifies and the media Jews ramp up evermore the anti-white propganda, the essential logic here is for more and more whites to hop on the dis-integration bandwagon themselves.

    Our elites–especially Jews–have push dis-integration, so dis-integration is what they are getting. White gentiles are more naturally tuned to openess and neighborly fellow feeling so they are the last guys on the bus. But even white gentiles get the message eventually.

    • Replies: @Lot
  331. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous

    https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/03/12/18376175.php

    It doesn’t look that big but in S.F. something that size would be worth many millions.

    Zillow estimates around $8.5 million.

    https://www.spokeo.com/CA/San-Francisco/2640-Broadway-St

    This is the corner of Broadway and Normandie in Pacific Heights.

    Maybe this is the gate to the vineyard in the Napa Valley that she also owns.

  332. @Jack D

    It’s not like white nationalists are shooting up synagogues or anything.

    Correction “white nationalist” and “synagogue”. Yep, it’s true, after a 100 years of hysterics about the cousin-marrying, pickup driving, gun toting goyim … you actually managed to get *one* loon pissed off enough–apparently about HIA–to attack.

    ~~

    For the record, I’ve got no problem with Jews having barred wire fences and security with guns–it makes sense. Of course, the actual day in, day out threat is overwhelmingly muslims, but the threat is real.

    The is the nation–diversity!–that American Jews have chosen–over an overwhelmlingly white, culturally “white America”–and studiously worked to bring about. If they don’t like it… look in the mirror.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  333. @Boethiuss

    You only changed your name post election after your ridiculous predictions never came to pass, and now you’re here with MITT 2020.

    L M A O

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
  334. @Lot

    Anyone who cares can easily access your posting history. You literally ragequit this site over being mad about Israel only to come crawling back. Trying to avoid taking a stand by claiming youre making money by playing all sides is why you and your coethnics keep getting kicked outta countries.

  335. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jack D

    The problem is that it is false and that it plays into the myth that the Joos control the media. When you ask for examples you get Murdoch (not Jewish), the Sulzbergers (Episcopalian), Katherine Graham (Episcopalian), etc. maybe mixed in with a few actual Jews.

    Sure, it’s a religion, it’s an ethnicity, it’s a floor-wax, it’s a desert topping. Both Sulzberger and Graham are ethnically half-jewish. Doesn’t that count? If they had won a Nobel Prize you would say it does. You have convenient definitions for who are, and are not, your people.

  336. @Steve Sailer

    Bob Geldof lost the Battle of the Thames to Nigel Farage.

    Geldof wanted to keep England in the prison house of nations called the European Union.

    Geldof is a globalizer wanker who wants to flood England with foreigners.

    Bob Geldof and Rupert Murdoch are globalizer bastards.

  337. Mr. Anon says:
    @Lot

    You mean random navel-gazing far leftie online essays? Yeah that’s some evidence.

    The people who write them, often for prestige publications, have a lot of influence. Or is it your contention that they write for famous, widely-read publications in order to NOT have influence.

    But, no matter, tell us again why people who write for the New York Times, or Atlantic Monthly, or the Washington Post have no influence, but somehow a guy who posts as “Lot” on unz.com does.

  338. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jack Hanson

    I wonder if the original Boethius was as much of a blowhard and a dick as our current version, “Boethiuss” (with two ss, for a double dose of signalling).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boethius

    One begins to sympathize with Theodoric.

    • Agree: Jack Hanson
  339. Lot says:
    @AnotherDad

    “You point is true, but you’re actually missing the critical dynamic that it points to”

    Not missing it, just missing its relevance to 2019. I certainly agree with “Jews are disproportionately responsible for communism and cultural Marxism,” though some exaggerate the extent, and it is mitigated by demographic factors Cofnas has discussed, and the smaller but real disproportionate contributions to anti-communism and social conservativism.

    But ….so what? There really hasn’t been much development of right-antisemitism in the past 100 years. MacDonald sounds a lot like The International Jew. If it were an idea Americans found convincing, it would have caught on by now. Instead, white antisemitism keeps declining from already low levels, Jews themselves become less and less plausible threats as they intermarry and otherwise decline and Hasidify demographically.

  340. nebulafox says:
    @J.Ross

    To boot, West Bengal and Bangladesh have far less of a wealth gap than Texas and California does with Mexico, let alone Central America. India does not have the same kind of developed welfare net that the US does, meaning that the fiscal burden of illegal immigration influxes isn’t as great, to say nothing of the far more informal economy in India. If you want to go down the comparison road, America has *more* illegal immigrants than India, despite India having three times as many people as America. And in West Bengal, people speak the same language, share the same culture, and look exactly the same as he illegal immigrants-a minority of them even still practice the same religion. So, the culture gap is a lot neater, too. If India deems it necessary to have a wall nonetheless, it certainly creates some issues for people who argue that it is completely beyond the pale for the US to consider for its own illegal immigration problems.

    Mind, there are some nuances to the situation when you consider the strict orders the border guards in India have. Bengal is still one of the poorest provinces, famous for its left-wing militancy in the past. Not exactly a place where you want a huge illegal immigration problem. There’s also the communal factor you have to consider. Even now, this manifests, and the media largely fails to get it when they do bother to pay attention. For instance, some of the people who’ve been shot crossing the border were doing brisk business in cattle smuggling. They capture roaming cows in India, smuggle them across the border, and make a brisk profit for Bangladeshi consumption, Muslims having no issues with eating beef. But the Hindus find this deeply, deeply offensive, to say the least. This is a big reason why much of the Indian lay public aren’t exactly outraged by the guards shooting to kill.

    • Replies: @nebulafox
  341. nebulafox says:
    @nebulafox

    I should clarify: I’m not even a real wall supporter, though I do find it a bit rich that the people arguing most against walls on the border are the ones who inevitably live in gated communities, away from other Americans. I always found Trump’s blunt insistence on it, without any further details, to be just red meat for gullible voters. I think there are much cheaper, more efficient, and more PR friendly ways to fix the illegal immigration problem.

    But there’s a huge difference between arguing against a wall on policy merits and going into emotional tirades with heavy doses of Emma Lazarus and demanding that we not even *discuss* it on morality. Truth be told, the whole illegal immigration debate isn’t even about that anymore. It’s about whether the American public has the right to demand that the government actually enforce an international border, and to hell with what the donors and CEOs and academics and journalists want. For the past couple of decades, Congress have repeatedly tried to pass amnesty, only for it to be rejected every time when voters made it clear that, no, they didn’t want that. But they just keep going back to it, and are going to keep going back until they get what they want. Cantor even committed career suicide when he insisted on choosing the Chamber of Commerce over the people who actually elected him.

    And don’t get me started on the fiscal angle. If Trump withdrew from Afghanistan tomorrow, he’d have enough for a wall and then some. Yet invariably, the sober, responsible GOP thinks we can afford that. Somehow. Over a million dollars per soldier.

    • Replies: @BB753
  342. @Jack D

    There are many decent Palestinians

    That would depend on what you mean by “many” and “decent”.

    • Replies: @bjondo
  343. @Moshe

    Whatever. Jews are natural gaslighters. By that I mean that on average, Jews score higher in

  344. To finish my previous comment, if Jews want to earn the trust of Americans, don’t gaslight. Don’t hedge truth, exaggerate outliers, pretend that my interest is your interest when not, fabricate information, adopt moral pretensions, resort consistently to ad hominem and emotional appeal, insist on the primacy of your moral stature as recipients of violence, and atrocity of same, only to destroy others because they are ignorant and in the way, and don’t weave fairy tales that weaken the ability of your credulous neighbors, especially their children, to discriminate, to distinguish good from bad and right from wrong. If this makes me an anti-Semite, Moshe, so be it.

  345. @JimB

    You are deranged, seek help.

  346. BB753 says:
    @nebulafox

    Trump cunningly called for building a wall, because it sells more than to say: we’re gonna put a double 10 feet tall metallic fence topped by concertina wire separated by 30 feet of no-man’s-land monitored by CCTV and patrolled by the National Guard and the Border Guard. Snipers might be called upon at certain hot-spots to keep human coyotes and trespassers away. It’s gonna cost less than a billion dollars to build, and a fraction of that to mantain annually. People see Trump as a builder. A new Akhenaton. Or maybe he fancies himself that way.
    An effective, Israeli or Hungarian -style is unsexy, but it works. No need to build a Great Wall like the Chinese. Or an underground Maginot line.
    Ultimately, the best wall is e-verify coupled with the threat of legal and lethal violence upon trespassers.
    Maybe Trump can’t understand anything that’s not made out of brick and mortar.

  347. @YetAnotherAnon

    That’s because the focus at Unz tends to be about bad things happening.
    There’s a correlation.

  348. @AnotherDad

    ” the actual day in, day out threat is overwhelmingly muslims, but the threat is real. ”

    ” the actual day in, day out threat is overwhelmingly blacks, but the threat is real. ”

    TFTFY

  349. Kylie says:
    @PaceLaw

    “It is a well stated belief of ALL Democrats that America should ALWAYS be open to everyone.”

    Everyone as long as they’re non-white.

  350. bjondo says:
    @Johann Ricke

    “many” means all palestinians.

    “decent” means way better than yid.

    5ds

  351. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack Hanson

    Jack, you’re completely full of shit on that point, and the fact that you insist on reiterating it bugs me, much more than it should frankly.

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/its-the-message-more-than-the-messenger/#comment-1604082
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/its-the-message-more-than-the-messenger/#comment-1604082
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/hillary-why-arent-i-50-points-ahead/#comment-1581516
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/wapo-why-isnt-clinton-far-ahead/#comment-1566292

    Here are just a few of my gloriously inaccurate Trump/Hillary election prognostications right here in this form with this handle “Boethiuss.” All of these were written before the 2016 election, as you ought to be able to plainly see for yourself. Give it up already.

    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
  352. @Boethiuss

    Your predictions as “Boethius” were so embarrassingly awful, it doesn’t change the fact you changed names to hide them while you went on making awful predictions.

    You mad cause I’m right, Mr. Mitt 2020.

    • Replies: @Boethiuss
  353. rbbe brod says:
    @Anon

    We need to stop being ethnocentric and get more men like Steven Miller. Think of it like getting an attorney

  354. Anon[394] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m fascinated by the claims being advanced here (of all places!) that Jews don’t control the media, and that liberal/internationalist open-borders American Jews are somehow antagonistic to blood-and-soil Israeli nationalist Jews.

    Whatever then are we to make of the behavior of the media during the Great Palestinian Bum Rush of last summer: at a time when thousands of Arabs (including children) were being shot by Israeli border guards, the American media flew into a collective rage… over the killing of Emmett Till 60 years ago.

  355. Boethiuss says:
    @Jack Hanson

    You mad cause I’m right, Mr. Mitt 2020.

    Bull-phucking-shit.

    Everytime someone tells you to put up or shut up, you pull some bullshit deflection. I’m surprised you haven’t said I was (((Jewish))) yet (I’m not).

    Specifically, you hallucinate all sorts of shit, and people here ask you legitimate questions. Why do you think RBG is dead? Why do you think Roy Moore is going to win (or did win) Alabama? What do reverse mortgages have to do with the price of tea in China? Who is your right-wing antifa and what do you think they could accomplish that the Republican Party couldn’t?

    Cut the shit. Either back it up, or give it up.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments are moderated by iSteve, at whim.


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?