The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Caldwell on "Le Suicide Français"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Christopher Caldwell writes in The Weekly Standard:

Although the French novelist Patrick Modiano won the Nobel in October, he has lately been bumped off the charts by Eric Zemmour, a talk-show pundit who is persona non grata among the country’s intellectual establishment. Zemmour’s Le suicide français (Paris: Albin Michel, 534 pages, 22.90 euros) is made for the moment. It argues that, since the French student uprising of May 1968, women’s libbers, Muslim migrants, crooked bankers, and overzealous judges have brought France to ruin. To judge from the reaction to Zemmour’s book—which sold a quarter-million copies in the fortnight after publication despite furious condemnations in all of the daily papers—large parts of the French public think he is right.

It is tempting to look at Zemmour as a television hothead in the Bill O’Reilly mold. He is that, at times. But his book has a great ambition, too. As Paul Johnson did in his magisterial Modern Times (1983), Zemmour takes a half-century of events that have been shrouded in progressive clichés and places them in a more logical relationship. His method is the one that historian Richard Reeves uses in his biographies of U.S. presidents. Zemmour will take an episode in France’s political or cultural life, describe the long train of events that made it possible, and extrapolate to its consequences. These are generally episodes that show the French choosing to do away with something they had formerly cherished: the release of director Bertrand Blier’s sexual picaresque Les valseuses in 1974;

A.k.a., “Going Places.” I tried watching that a year ago and only made it through ten minutes of the young Gerard Depardieu in his breakout role as a petty criminal harassing some poor woman as she tried to walk down the street.

the 1993 law abandoning the list of approved (usually saints’) names that had been in force for two centuries;

Here’s a French baby name tracker (via Andrew Gelman’s stats site). The French used to have a fairly limited list of first names, but now they’ve dispersed like crazy, except for Mohammed.

President Jacques Chirac’s abolition of military conscription in 1996; the introduction of affirmative action in one of France’s elite universities that same year; the booing of the “Marseillaise,” the French national anthem, by North African immigrant spectators during a game against Algeria in October 2001, weeks after the attacks on the World Trade Center; the lack of any commemoration of the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Austerlitz (1805), perhaps the greatest victory of Napoleon, who until that point had been revered almost as a demigod in French popular culture; and so on.

Zemmour’s idea of France is built around its great nation-builders: Richelieu, Napoleon, and above all General (later president) Charles de Gaulle. It was de Gaulle who rescued French honor after the country’s surrender and occupation in World War II and unified the postwar nation around a narrative of its fight against the Nazis—even if that narrative was mythological, the fight having been in large part confined to Communists, various Christians, and the general himself. De Gaulle’s conservatism was different from conservatism elsewhere. He was attached more to the grandeur of the French nation, less to liberty and small government, and he neither admired nor trusted the United States. After his death in 1970, French politicians made their peace with the free market and a less ambitious view of their country’s destiny. Its intellectuals came to treat their fathers as a bunch of collaborators. Zemmour now sees the post-de Gaulle consensus as an unpatriotic sellout. “We were taught to love what we used to hate,” he writes, “and to hate what we used to love.”

The means by which France’s institutions were pulled off their hinges will be familiar to Americans. Utopian court decrees had a lot to do with it, but even commonsensical laws could be interpreted in radical ways, leaving French people asking: When did I vote for that? Mass immigration, especially from France’s hastily abandoned colonies in North Africa and West Africa, looms over this book as the great unintended consequence. It was already transforming France by the time de Gaulle left power. But a seemingly straightforward antidiscrimination law of 1972, by introducing “the principle of nondiscrimination between French and foreigners,” made it impossible to stop. The law was interpreted in a spirit that led not just to equality but to an outright preference for foreigners. The North African traditional family was treated as essential to the flourishing of its members, so that “family reunification” became grounds for bringing in vast numbers of new residents, once a single family member was working on French soil.

By contrast, with the women’s movement in full swing, the French traditional family was treated as an oppressive vestige from which wives and children must be liberated. Zemmour sees feminism as one of the central tragedies of postwar France (even if, to the outsider, there appears to have been less of it there than elsewhere). Feminists had called for “liberated” relations between the sexes. …

But women turned out not to like that kind of man very much, once they had him. Zemmour notes that the ruthless Don Juans of the old macho sexual order had feared two things above all: pregnancy and marriage. “The paradox of feminism,” he writes, “was that it fulfilled the dreams of generations of male predators.” …

The son of North African Jewish immigrant parents, Zemmour is sensitive about immigration in both senses of the word “sensitive.” That is, he is highly nuanced and easily angered. Even if it was retreating from a large colonial empire, France had no recent legacy of slavery and segregation to atone for, as America did. But it was not lost on the Socialist president François Mitterrand, who came to power in 1981, what a powerful rallying cry and organizing tool the rejection of racism had proven to be in the United States. In 1984 his government helped establish the NGO SOS Racisme to agitate and propagandize. It was a solution in search of a problem, but it was mightily effective in intimidating French journalists and politicians. Thereafter the press covered immigration, Zemmour writes, through anecdotage, discussing “the individual fates of immigrants, their wives, their children, their emotions, their resentments .  .  . willfully obscuring their collective, historical side, as members of a people that had its own roots, its culture, its religion, its heroes, and its dreams of postcolonial vengeance.” Much as feminism was a windfall for macho men, the sort of antiracism that protects the foreign-born from hard questions proved good news for a certain kind of racist. According to the filmmaker Alexandre Arcady, in the public schools of the vast suburban département of Seine-St-Denis, once heavily Jewish and now heavily Arab, there is “not a single student of Jewish faith.”

And here’s F. Roger Devlin’s review in American Renaissance.

 
Hide 55 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. syonredux says:

    France had no recent legacy of slavery and segregation to atone for, as America did.

    France abolished slavery in 1794…..then re-established slavery in 1802.France did not permanently end slavery until 1848.And here are some calculations for the death toll in the Haitian revolt against French rule:

    Saint-Domingue (1791-1803) [make link]
    Slave Revolt and Civil War
    Scheina, Latin America’s Wars, v.2, p.18
    Haitians: 350,000 d.
    French
    soldiers: only 10,000 survived out of 55,131 sent
    sailors: 10,000 d.
    Dumas (citing Fröhlich):
    French: 60,000
    Whites: 50,000
    Colored: 50,000
    TOTAL: 160,000
    Rogozinski, A Brief History of the Caribbean (1994):
    More than one third of the 435,000 slaves died (i.e. >145,000)
    1791: rebel slaves killed 2,000 whites
    1793-98: 13,000 out of 20,000 British troops died, mostly of disease.
    1802-1803: French lost 40,000 soldiers.
    James Trager, The People’s Chronology (1992): 2,000 Whites and 10,000 Blacks and Mulattoes k (1791)

    As for Segregation…..Mr Caldwell seems to be operating under some curious illusions as to how the French Empire operated away from the Metropole

    Read More
    • Replies: @Southfarthing
    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized:

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP.
     
    , @MartianObserver

    Mr Caldwell seems to be operating under some curious illusions as to how the French Empire operated away from the Metropole
     
    And let's not forget Francafrique. I love how French critics of American imperialism have absolutely nothing to say about France's imperialism-by-proxy in it's former African colonies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /isteve/caldwell-on-le-suicide-francais/#comment-787326
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Zemmour is allowed to say and write those things in the media because he is Sephardic and not a purebred Frenchman. It makes the accusations of racism and xenophobia ridiculous. And even if the well-thinking people thinks he’s outrageous they keep inviting him because of the ratings. Still, the success of his book, dethroning Francois Hollande’s ex-girlfriend “badmouthing book” on the Best-Sellers list, is a sign that reactionary have the wind in their sails outside the U.S. But is it to late?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. Meh. As far as I’m concerned, Christopher Caldwell is another neocon BS-artist. I always enjoyed reading him in the Financial Times when he wrote about the UK because he got his facts wrong repeatedly.

    As for Eric Zemmour — the comparison with Paul Johnson’s Modern Times is instructive.

    What changed in British politics or society after the publication (and publicization) of Johnson’s book in 1983?

    Nothing. We continued on our downward slide.

    I wish France the best of luck.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Priss Factor [AKA "terrapin gape"] says:

    “A.k.a., “Going Places.” I tried watching that a year ago and only made it through ten minutes of the young Gerard Depardieu in his breakout role as a petty criminal harassing some poor woman as she tried to walk down the street.”

    Saw the whole thing in 1991 on VHS. If you’re a moral idiot or sociopath(as Kael sometimes could be), it can be fun. But my priggish moral sense kept getting in the way. It made me sick, as did Get Out Your Handkerchiefs. And when the woman(who was the girl in Forbidden Games) was used as a whore, it made you angry at the world.

    That said, it’s made in a fun breezy way and has a catchy music.

    It was like a French MASH, another film that is highly enjoyable if you’re a moral idiot or anarchist sociopath.

    Some might say Going Places is no more offensive than Last Tango in Paris or Beavis and Butthead.
    But here’s the difference. Last Tango can be off-putting too but there’s genuine power in the emotions, and the last 30 min is outstanding.
    As for B & B, they are really just harmless couple of kids. They are too dumb too hurt anyone.

    In contrast, Going Places has two degenerates wreaking mindless havoc on society just for the sake of it. It sickens me like Tarantino movies after Reservoir Dogs or the trashy art films of von Trier. Or Kevin Smith. There’s an inhuman sensibility at work. Movies by people of some talent but zero taste and depth.

    The sicko who made Man Bites Dog took this to the limit. After watching that foul-fest, I wanted to kill someone: the director.

    If any movie should be burned, it’s this one.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoO35mKRguY

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake Grant
    The director of Man Bites Dog committed suicide in 2006 aged 39
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Dennis Dale says: • Website

    it was not lost on the Socialist president François Mitterrand, who came to power in 1981, what a powerful rallying cry and organizing tool the rejection of racism had proven to be in the United States

    The US civil rights movement created a model that’s proven disastrous.

    Some Ferguson protesters were still at it in Portland yesterday, shutting down a street. I heard about it from a thirty-ish part time dj with two gages in each earlobe; he shouted at the protesters for making him late for work and they called back “what are you, a racist?” Of course they were serious. This is Portland.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. Bert says:

    de Gaulle’s conservatism was different from conservatism elsewhere. He was attached more to the grandeur of the French nation, less to liberty and small government

    I love how this moron insinuates that conservatism is somehow intrinsically linked to small government. That’s pretty much a purely American thing.

    De Gaulle was a French nationalist first and foremost.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    I love how this moron insinuates that conservatism is somehow intrinsically linked to small government. That’s pretty much a purely American thing.

     

    Conservatism conserves tradition. This differs by peoples. Liberty is tradition in the Anglo-Saxon ecumene. (Not "purely American", though it is stronger here.) Obviously Chinese conservatism will vary.

    Also, conservatives want to conserve the church and the family. The left-- all the left, everywhere-- sees these as threats. And they're right. To them.

    Thus, post-1789 conservatism almost everywhere will necessarily be less statist than almost anything to its left.

    By the way, which government agency came up with those 386 (or however many) cheeses DeGaulle quipped about?

    , @slumber_j
    Caldwell did put it more categorically than he might have. But most or even all Anglophone countries have at least a strain of small-government conservatism; and he is writing for an English-speaking, mainly conservative readership. In any case, your assertion that "De Gaulle was a French nationalist first and foremost" is more or less what he's saying, isn't it?

    By the way, you may disagree with him, and he may get facts wrong from time to time--as all journalists do. But I used to know Chris Caldwell pretty well, and unless he's gotten a lot less smart in the meantime, he most certainly is not a "moron."

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. @syonredux

    France had no recent legacy of slavery and segregation to atone for, as America did.
     
    France abolished slavery in 1794.....then re-established slavery in 1802.France did not permanently end slavery until 1848.And here are some calculations for the death toll in the Haitian revolt against French rule:

    Saint-Domingue (1791-1803) [make link]
    Slave Revolt and Civil War
    Scheina, Latin America's Wars, v.2, p.18
    Haitians: 350,000 d.
    French
    soldiers: only 10,000 survived out of 55,131 sent
    sailors: 10,000 d.
    Dumas (citing Fröhlich):
    French: 60,000
    Whites: 50,000
    Colored: 50,000
    TOTAL: 160,000
    Rogozinski, A Brief History of the Caribbean (1994):
    More than one third of the 435,000 slaves died (i.e. >145,000)
    1791: rebel slaves killed 2,000 whites
    1793-98: 13,000 out of 20,000 British troops died, mostly of disease.
    1802-1803: French lost 40,000 soldiers.
    James Trager, The People's Chronology (1992): 2,000 Whites and 10,000 Blacks and Mulattoes k (1791)
     
    As for Segregation.....Mr Caldwell seems to be operating under some curious illusions as to how the French Empire operated away from the Metropole

    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized:

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stone Garden

    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized
     
    It could be argued by your logic, that, rape benefits the rape victim.

    Each additional act of rape results in a baby and the joys of motherhood.

    BTW, who was it precisely that asked the superhumanly philanthropic white man to shower us with colonial goodies???

    How many %s of GDP did Leopold II's rule bestow on Congo?

    Yes, the white man built bridges and railways... but only to make sure the loot could be transported away more efficiently.

    Yes, the white man built telegraph wires... but only to make sure that news about the natives' rebellions could be send to the garrisons faster.

    Yes, the white man introduced fertilizers and irrigation ... but only to make sure that slave plantations could be more profitable.

    Who was the beneficiaries of GDP increase? Was it the aborigine or the Euro that replaced him??????
    , @syonredux

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP.
     
    As a Burkean Conservative, I tend to think that there is more to life than GDP, dear fellow
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP
     
    And how did the non- or minor colonizers fare-- Switzerland, Luxembourg, Denmark? 50, 60, 70% greater?
    , @Jaakko Raipala
    It's not at all reasonable to be critical of immigration and at the same time defend colonialism because of its benefits for GDP.

    After all the argument we constantly hear for letting the Middle East and Africa colonize Europe is that it will boost our GDP or that it's necessary to stop our GDP from declining due to aging populations. Whether or not that's true should be completely irrelevant as what most of us really want is not to be colonized by Africa or the Middle East, regardless of whether it has some material benefits. It clearly does have material benefits even to the average guy (I'm enjoying those cheap immigrant restaurants that we didn't use to have) but they don't outweigh the non-material downsides like ballooning crime, white flight and political polarization.

    It should be similarly irrelevant whether colonialism benefited Third World countries, most of them did not ask to be colonized and the past European elites telling the rest of the world that they will be colonized, fed European cultures and European immigration because of the supposed economic benefits is no different from today's European elite telling us that we will be colonized, fed Middle Eastern and African cultures and immigration because of the supposed economic benefits.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Like the French, we Americans are told that we must insist on and that we must enjoy having ever fewer enfants de la patrie.

    How’s your enjoyment coming along, then?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. Hey Steve says:

    http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/bosnian-community-in-st-louis-outraged-over-fatal-hammer-attack/article_9f15bf49-c8b7-5bc3-8671-ac291f666084.html?mode=comments

    Bosnian man killed by a gang of black and “hispanic”(black hispanic, probably P. Rican or Dominican) teens who were carrying hammers. Didn’t rob him — was a random “mayhem” attack.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. OT: Unarmed White teen in Alabama killed by Black police officer.

    The officer was rightfully in fear of his life. The teen stood a full 5’7″ tall, and weighed 135 pounds… approximately the size of UFC heavyweight champion Brock Lesnar.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. Speaking of France, this has been priceless:

    “Angry protesters blocked the premiere of ‘Exhibit B’ in the Parisian suburb of Saint Denis on Thursday. While members of the black community say the art show is misguided and racist, organisers say its forced cancelling is pure censorship.”

    http://www.france24.com/en/20141128-video-protests-paris-premiere-human-zoo-art-show-exhibit-b/

    Some additional info:
    - Saint-Denis, in whose ancient cathedral all French kings rest, is part of a large suburb north of Paris that has become majority Arab and African.
    - The “play” is staged by a white South African at the government-funded avant-garde Théâtre Gérard Philipe, last civilized outpost in a sea of kebab shops, African market stalls, and mosques.
    - The shouting matches between furious black protesters and white theater types are highly entertaining street comedy. PC self-abasement is a hard sell in some quartiers. And the protesters yell: “This racist junk is made by whites for a white audience! We don’t want this in our neighborhood!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    There is no doubt whatsoever that sometime this century, between the dates 2050 and 2100, France will become a majority non-white nation.
    Anyone who tries to claim otherwise is either a fool or a liar.
    A telling piece of evidence, (the French typically and sniffly refuse to compile ‘racial statistics’), is the rate of testing for all newborn infants for sickle cell anemia genetic markers. This is a disease that is exclusively African , being unknown amongst Europeans. To save resources, testing is done on the self reported geographical origin of the parents. Currently, something like 37.5% of all newborns are tested. The rate of testing appears to increase by 1.25% points each and every year. It doesn’t takes a genius to work out that within 10 years, African origin newborns will comprise half of births. By simple extent ion, around 33 years after that, ie year 2057, or call it 2060 to tie up loose ends, France will have a majority non white population.

    Suffice to say that prior to 1939, France had a negligible non European population, and France has always been the ‘premier’ European nation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. Horzabky says:

    According to the filmmaker Alexandre Arcady, in the public schools of the vast suburban département of Seine-St-Denis, once heavily Jewish and now heavily Arab, there is “not a single student of Jewish faith.”

    I live in Seine Saint-Denis. I remember a conversation I had with a Jewish neighbor, many years ago. He was a liberal. He insisted on two points : 1) France must be as multi-ethnic and multi-racial as possible, 2) Israel must remain a Jewish country (that was his rejoinder to my suggestion that the Palestinians, as the most ancient residents of the land, if they were smart, would demand Israeli citizenship, and then influence Israeli policies from within).

    So far, he got what he wanted, both in France and in Israel. But beware of what you wish, you might just get it… The new non-white majority of Seine Saint-Denis is rabidly anti-Jewish and worships anti-semites Dieudonné and Alain Soral as heroes. Their basic idea is ‘réconciliation‘, which, in practice, means that Blacks, Muslims and Whites must be united in a common loathing of Jews.

    Which, when you think about it, is a desperate ideology. People who know that they have no future turn on those they think are responsible for their plight.

    Alain Soral looks to me like a crypto-Muslim, but he also evinces nostalgia for the France of old, White, catholic, law-abiding and socially conservative. He’s in his fifties, like me. That was the France we knew when we were children.

    Someone who read Zemmour’s book said that Zemmour proposes no solutions. Of course he doesn’t, because there are none, short of a civil war in which millions would die and France would become a failed state. I know that it sounds fanciful to Americans, but less so in Europe, because there are states that imploded in Europe already: the distance from Paris to Kiev is about the same as from New-York to Dallas, and between the former Yugoslavia and France there’s only northern Italy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @gu
    "The new non-white majority of Seine Saint-Denis is rabidly anti-Jewish and worships anti-semites Dieudonné and Alain Soral as heroes. "

    Why would they be "anti semites" exactly?
    , @WhatEvvs
    I would like to ask you an honest question, and I mean this in the most respectful way. I do not want to start an argument.

    When you speak of the Catholic, white France of your childhood, I think of people like Brigitte Bardot, who was given a good strict Catholic upbringing. Her stage mother also wanted her to become a model, and so guided her sheltered daughter into modeling. Bardot met Vadim, who took over her life, and the rest is history. But Bardot always admitted that she freely chose to become, as she put it, "a libertine."

    France has always had this dual nature, to me as a foreigner. Devout and libertine. Religious and clinically skeptical.

    OK, so my question is: how much of this breakdown has to do with Muslim immigration and Jewish phonies like your neighbor, and how much of it has to do with native Gallic libertinism?

    Let me repeat that I am not trying to start a fruitless back and forth argument here, just want your impressions as a Frenchman. Whatever you say I will accept as your perspective and that will be that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. @syonredux

    France had no recent legacy of slavery and segregation to atone for, as America did.
     
    France abolished slavery in 1794.....then re-established slavery in 1802.France did not permanently end slavery until 1848.And here are some calculations for the death toll in the Haitian revolt against French rule:

    Saint-Domingue (1791-1803) [make link]
    Slave Revolt and Civil War
    Scheina, Latin America's Wars, v.2, p.18
    Haitians: 350,000 d.
    French
    soldiers: only 10,000 survived out of 55,131 sent
    sailors: 10,000 d.
    Dumas (citing Fröhlich):
    French: 60,000
    Whites: 50,000
    Colored: 50,000
    TOTAL: 160,000
    Rogozinski, A Brief History of the Caribbean (1994):
    More than one third of the 435,000 slaves died (i.e. >145,000)
    1791: rebel slaves killed 2,000 whites
    1793-98: 13,000 out of 20,000 British troops died, mostly of disease.
    1802-1803: French lost 40,000 soldiers.
    James Trager, The People's Chronology (1992): 2,000 Whites and 10,000 Blacks and Mulattoes k (1791)
     
    As for Segregation.....Mr Caldwell seems to be operating under some curious illusions as to how the French Empire operated away from the Metropole

    Mr Caldwell seems to be operating under some curious illusions as to how the French Empire operated away from the Metropole

    And let’s not forget Francafrique. I love how French critics of American imperialism have absolutely nothing to say about France’s imperialism-by-proxy in it’s former African colonies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Twinkie says:

    Which is worse, an invasion of migrant Muslims or a latter-day Voelkerwanderung of the Neo-Goths and -Vandals from the Global South?

    Also on a completely unrelated note, getting into elite colleges still not that tough:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/30/upshot/for-accomplished-students-reaching-a-top-college-isnt-actually-that-hard.html

    It’s still all fine for the children of the elites!

    Does Unz Review or this sub-section have a link submission page one can use instead of intruding into unrelated (latest) threads to get Mr. Sailer’s attention?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. A much better review of Zemmour’s Le suicide français

    http://www.amren.com/features/2014/11/forty-years-that-unmade-france/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Thanks, I'll add a link.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. @Southfarthing
    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized:

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP.
     

    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized

    It could be argued by your logic, that, rape benefits the rape victim.

    Each additional act of rape results in a baby and the joys of motherhood.

    BTW, who was it precisely that asked the superhumanly philanthropic white man to shower us with colonial goodies???

    How many %s of GDP did Leopold II‘s rule bestow on Congo?

    Yes, the white man built bridges and railways… but only to make sure the loot could be transported away more efficiently.

    Yes, the white man built telegraph wires… but only to make sure that news about the natives’ rebellions could be send to the garrisons faster.

    Yes, the white man introduced fertilizers and irrigation … but only to make sure that slave plantations could be more profitable.

    Who was the beneficiaries of GDP increase? Was it the aborigine or the Euro that replaced him??????

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hard Line Realist

    Each additional act of rape results in a baby and the joys of motherhood.
     
    Ahhh, so there are people who agree that it's about males who do not have many options gaining reproduction opportunities.

    Thanks for admitting it after all this time.
    , @Big Bill

    It could be argued by your logic, that, rape benefits the rape victim.
     
    So we are in agreement: colonialism is rape. Not wishing to be raped, I am against African and Hispanic colonialism in my country, the USA. Thank you for that very apt equivalence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. @anonymous-antimarxist
    A much better review of Zemmour’s Le suicide français

    http://www.amren.com/features/2014/11/forty-years-that-unmade-france/

    Thanks, I’ll add a link.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @Priss Factor
    "A.k.a., “Going Places.” I tried watching that a year ago and only made it through ten minutes of the young Gerard Depardieu in his breakout role as a petty criminal harassing some poor woman as she tried to walk down the street."

    Saw the whole thing in 1991 on VHS. If you're a moral idiot or sociopath(as Kael sometimes could be), it can be fun. But my priggish moral sense kept getting in the way. It made me sick, as did Get Out Your Handkerchiefs. And when the woman(who was the girl in Forbidden Games) was used as a whore, it made you angry at the world.

    That said, it's made in a fun breezy way and has a catchy music.

    http://youtu.be/Tzz3iTZLXY4?t=20m49s

    It was like a French MASH, another film that is highly enjoyable if you're a moral idiot or anarchist sociopath.

    Some might say Going Places is no more offensive than Last Tango in Paris or Beavis and Butthead.
    But here's the difference. Last Tango can be off-putting too but there's genuine power in the emotions, and the last 30 min is outstanding.
    As for B & B, they are really just harmless couple of kids. They are too dumb too hurt anyone.

    In contrast, Going Places has two degenerates wreaking mindless havoc on society just for the sake of it. It sickens me like Tarantino movies after Reservoir Dogs or the trashy art films of von Trier. Or Kevin Smith. There's an inhuman sensibility at work. Movies by people of some talent but zero taste and depth.

    The sicko who made Man Bites Dog took this to the limit. After watching that foul-fest, I wanted to kill someone: the director.

    If any movie should be burned, it's this one.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoO35mKRguY

    The director of Man Bites Dog committed suicide in 2006 aged 39

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. a reader says:

    @Farang
    People who know that they have no future turn on those they think are responsible for their plight.

    Just take a look at the 1st SOS Racisme festival: Harlem Desir(on screen), Bernard Henri-Levy, Marek Halter and Julien Dray.

    Coincidentally the four leaders of the ONG happen to be non-Christian.

    Less than 30 years ago, a journalist could ask these guys if there was not too many Jews at the helm (of SOS Racisme), can you believe it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. a reader says:

    Sorry, that’s not Julien Dray, but Eric Ghebali, secrétaire général de l’UEJF (Union des étudiants juifs de France).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. dearieme says:

    “not a single student of Jewish faith” doesn’t logically exclude there being secular Jews – though they’d have to be pretty foolhardy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. Keith Vaz [AKA "Notorious BIG"] says:

    “it fulfilled the dreams of generations of male predators.”

    That paragraph completely vindicates the greatest social critic, psychologist, anthropologist and writer of the modern era – Chateau Heartiste.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. Sunbeam says:

    You guys really think Heartiste has any significance?

    I’m kind of baffled by that whole thing. I’ve looked at that site and read a few of his pieces.

    The whole thing just strikes me as terribly unimportant. Useless even.

    Maybe I’m wrong, my take was it was a whole lotta noise and no signal. Nothing to learn or think about there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. Bettega [AKA "Derfel"] says:

    “Zemmour’s idea of France is built around its great nation-builders: Richelieu, Napoleon, and above all General (later president) Charles de Gaulle.”

    My idea of France is built around Clovis, Charles Martel, Charlemagne… after all, May 1968 is the logical outcome of Napoleon’s own liberalism.

    I’m ok with de Gaulle, though.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. syonredux says:
    @Southfarthing
    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized:

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP.
     

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP.

    As a Burkean Conservative, I tend to think that there is more to life than GDP, dear fellow

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @Bert

    de Gaulle’s conservatism was different from conservatism elsewhere. He was attached more to the grandeur of the French nation, less to liberty and small government
     
    I love how this moron insinuates that conservatism is somehow intrinsically linked to small government. That's pretty much a purely American thing.

    De Gaulle was a French nationalist first and foremost.

    I love how this moron insinuates that conservatism is somehow intrinsically linked to small government. That’s pretty much a purely American thing.

    Conservatism conserves tradition. This differs by peoples. Liberty is tradition in the Anglo-Saxon ecumene. (Not “purely American”, though it is stronger here.) Obviously Chinese conservatism will vary.

    Also, conservatives want to conserve the church and the family. The left– all the left, everywhere– sees these as threats. And they’re right. To them.

    Thus, post-1789 conservatism almost everywhere will necessarily be less statist than almost anything to its left.

    By the way, which government agency came up with those 386 (or however many) cheeses DeGaulle quipped about?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Southfarthing
    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized:

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP.
     

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP

    And how did the non- or minor colonizers fare– Switzerland, Luxembourg, Denmark? 50, 60, 70% greater?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. @Southfarthing
    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized:

    Each additional century of colonial status resulted in a 40% greater GDP.
     

    It’s not at all reasonable to be critical of immigration and at the same time defend colonialism because of its benefits for GDP.

    After all the argument we constantly hear for letting the Middle East and Africa colonize Europe is that it will boost our GDP or that it’s necessary to stop our GDP from declining due to aging populations. Whether or not that’s true should be completely irrelevant as what most of us really want is not to be colonized by Africa or the Middle East, regardless of whether it has some material benefits. It clearly does have material benefits even to the average guy (I’m enjoying those cheap immigrant restaurants that we didn’t use to have) but they don’t outweigh the non-material downsides like ballooning crime, white flight and political polarization.

    It should be similarly irrelevant whether colonialism benefited Third World countries, most of them did not ask to be colonized and the past European elites telling the rest of the world that they will be colonized, fed European cultures and European immigration because of the supposed economic benefits is no different from today’s European elite telling us that we will be colonized, fed Middle Eastern and African cultures and immigration because of the supposed economic benefits.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. carol says:

    the ruthless Don Juans of the old macho sexual order had feared two things above all: pregnancy and marriage.

    I see feminism as a negotiated settlement, since relations between the sexes were pretty grim by 1963.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. gu says:
    @Horzabky
    According to the filmmaker Alexandre Arcady, in the public schools of the vast suburban département of Seine-St-Denis, once heavily Jewish and now heavily Arab, there is “not a single student of Jewish faith.”

    I live in Seine Saint-Denis. I remember a conversation I had with a Jewish neighbor, many years ago. He was a liberal. He insisted on two points : 1) France must be as multi-ethnic and multi-racial as possible, 2) Israel must remain a Jewish country (that was his rejoinder to my suggestion that the Palestinians, as the most ancient residents of the land, if they were smart, would demand Israeli citizenship, and then influence Israeli policies from within).

    So far, he got what he wanted, both in France and in Israel. But beware of what you wish, you might just get it... The new non-white majority of Seine Saint-Denis is rabidly anti-Jewish and worships anti-semites Dieudonné and Alain Soral as heroes. Their basic idea is 'réconciliation', which, in practice, means that Blacks, Muslims and Whites must be united in a common loathing of Jews.

    Which, when you think about it, is a desperate ideology. People who know that they have no future turn on those they think are responsible for their plight.

    Alain Soral looks to me like a crypto-Muslim, but he also evinces nostalgia for the France of old, White, catholic, law-abiding and socially conservative. He's in his fifties, like me. That was the France we knew when we were children.

    Someone who read Zemmour's book said that Zemmour proposes no solutions. Of course he doesn't, because there are none, short of a civil war in which millions would die and France would become a failed state. I know that it sounds fanciful to Americans, but less so in Europe, because there are states that imploded in Europe already: the distance from Paris to Kiev is about the same as from New-York to Dallas, and between the former Yugoslavia and France there's only northern Italy.

    “The new non-white majority of Seine Saint-Denis is rabidly anti-Jewish and worships anti-semites Dieudonné and Alain Soral as heroes. ”

    Why would they be “anti semites” exactly?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. WhatEvvs [AKA "Bemused"] says:

    France isn’t committing suicide. Geez, people here think that stuff just happens overnight. It takes time for things to percolate. There will be une reaction enorme. Vive La France!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. WhatEvvs [AKA "Bemused"] says:
    @Horzabky
    According to the filmmaker Alexandre Arcady, in the public schools of the vast suburban département of Seine-St-Denis, once heavily Jewish and now heavily Arab, there is “not a single student of Jewish faith.”

    I live in Seine Saint-Denis. I remember a conversation I had with a Jewish neighbor, many years ago. He was a liberal. He insisted on two points : 1) France must be as multi-ethnic and multi-racial as possible, 2) Israel must remain a Jewish country (that was his rejoinder to my suggestion that the Palestinians, as the most ancient residents of the land, if they were smart, would demand Israeli citizenship, and then influence Israeli policies from within).

    So far, he got what he wanted, both in France and in Israel. But beware of what you wish, you might just get it... The new non-white majority of Seine Saint-Denis is rabidly anti-Jewish and worships anti-semites Dieudonné and Alain Soral as heroes. Their basic idea is 'réconciliation', which, in practice, means that Blacks, Muslims and Whites must be united in a common loathing of Jews.

    Which, when you think about it, is a desperate ideology. People who know that they have no future turn on those they think are responsible for their plight.

    Alain Soral looks to me like a crypto-Muslim, but he also evinces nostalgia for the France of old, White, catholic, law-abiding and socially conservative. He's in his fifties, like me. That was the France we knew when we were children.

    Someone who read Zemmour's book said that Zemmour proposes no solutions. Of course he doesn't, because there are none, short of a civil war in which millions would die and France would become a failed state. I know that it sounds fanciful to Americans, but less so in Europe, because there are states that imploded in Europe already: the distance from Paris to Kiev is about the same as from New-York to Dallas, and between the former Yugoslavia and France there's only northern Italy.

    I would like to ask you an honest question, and I mean this in the most respectful way. I do not want to start an argument.

    When you speak of the Catholic, white France of your childhood, I think of people like Brigitte Bardot, who was given a good strict Catholic upbringing. Her stage mother also wanted her to become a model, and so guided her sheltered daughter into modeling. Bardot met Vadim, who took over her life, and the rest is history. But Bardot always admitted that she freely chose to become, as she put it, “a libertine.”

    France has always had this dual nature, to me as a foreigner. Devout and libertine. Religious and clinically skeptical.

    OK, so my question is: how much of this breakdown has to do with Muslim immigration and Jewish phonies like your neighbor, and how much of it has to do with native Gallic libertinism?

    Let me repeat that I am not trying to start a fruitless back and forth argument here, just want your impressions as a Frenchman. Whatever you say I will accept as your perspective and that will be that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. John says:

    GOOD TO READ ABOUT LE SUICIDE FRANÇAIS BY ZEMMOUR.

    First of all, this is good news that this book was written and is so popular.

    Maybe it will prod the gullible French to wake up from their slumber and stop voting for the libthugs who have destroyed their country.

    The fact that he is Jewish is good too. This is because the biggest groups that promote 3rd world immigration into white countries are Jewish.

    For instance, Jewish Barbara Lerner Spectre wants more 3rd world immigration into Sweden—despite the fact that these 3rd world immigrants are raping and killing white women, taking away jobs, adding to crime and congestion. But she did not care and wanted more of them.

    See:

    http://www.whyileftsweden.com/?p=198

    So it is good to see a Jewish person like Zemmour who is able to think independently and speak out against 3rd world immigration, the #1 weapon of the Jewish establishment.

    Hopefully, people will wake up and stop voting for left wing parties, like the Democratic party in USA, Labor in UK and instead vote for conservative parties that promise to ban immigration such as BNP, La Pen, etc. Another option is people must amend the constitution to allow binding superseding national referenda so they can ban immigration themselves. Eg. Ncid.us.

    Otherwise, whites will be killed, raped and murdered on the streets by the 3rd world invaders.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Barbara Lerner Spectre doesn't speak for ordinary Swedish Jews. They're the ones fleeing Muslim violence in Malmo that is the result of the 3rd world immigration she supports. It is also the case that one of the leaders of the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats is Kent Ekeroth, a half-Jew.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @Stone Garden

    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized
     
    It could be argued by your logic, that, rape benefits the rape victim.

    Each additional act of rape results in a baby and the joys of motherhood.

    BTW, who was it precisely that asked the superhumanly philanthropic white man to shower us with colonial goodies???

    How many %s of GDP did Leopold II's rule bestow on Congo?

    Yes, the white man built bridges and railways... but only to make sure the loot could be transported away more efficiently.

    Yes, the white man built telegraph wires... but only to make sure that news about the natives' rebellions could be send to the garrisons faster.

    Yes, the white man introduced fertilizers and irrigation ... but only to make sure that slave plantations could be more profitable.

    Who was the beneficiaries of GDP increase? Was it the aborigine or the Euro that replaced him??????

    Each additional act of rape results in a baby and the joys of motherhood.

    Ahhh, so there are people who agree that it’s about males who do not have many options gaining reproduction opportunities.

    Thanks for admitting it after all this time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stone Garden

    Ahhh, so there are people who agree that it’s about males who do not have many options gaining reproduction opportunities.

    Thanks for admitting it after all this time.

     

    Yup. Except the satirists become a lynch mob when it comes to some little-known small town in Albion. :)

    The sword of sociobiology cuts both ways I guess.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. “The paradox of feminism,” he writes, “was that it fulfilled the dreams of generations of male predators.” …

    The battle will be won when it is widely understood that this is no paradox at all. Feminism itself is grossly reactionary.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. Big Bill says:
    @Stone Garden

    Colonialism Benefited the Colonized
     
    It could be argued by your logic, that, rape benefits the rape victim.

    Each additional act of rape results in a baby and the joys of motherhood.

    BTW, who was it precisely that asked the superhumanly philanthropic white man to shower us with colonial goodies???

    How many %s of GDP did Leopold II's rule bestow on Congo?

    Yes, the white man built bridges and railways... but only to make sure the loot could be transported away more efficiently.

    Yes, the white man built telegraph wires... but only to make sure that news about the natives' rebellions could be send to the garrisons faster.

    Yes, the white man introduced fertilizers and irrigation ... but only to make sure that slave plantations could be more profitable.

    Who was the beneficiaries of GDP increase? Was it the aborigine or the Euro that replaced him??????

    It could be argued by your logic, that, rape benefits the rape victim.

    So we are in agreement: colonialism is rape. Not wishing to be raped, I am against African and Hispanic colonialism in my country, the USA. Thank you for that very apt equivalence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stone Garden

    So we are in agreement: colonialism is rape. Not wishing to be raped, I am against African and Hispanic colonialism in my country, the USA. Thank you for that very apt equivalence.

     

    No no no no no buddy... you've got it all muddled up.

    In your case it was NOT rape as it was CONSENSUAL.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Whiskey says: • Website

    Re Colonization: Africa was not Switzerland. And not all colonizers were the same. Africa was colonized because it was weak and lacked the ability to repel invaders outside its disease load. The Belgian Congo was a hell-hole that even the Kaiser not known for his human feeling condemned as an affront to humanity and God. The French less bad, and with schools and railways built that Africans could not and would not build. The British even less bad, with even more railways and schools and even universities built. The Spanish and Portugese did fairly nothing in Africa, but only ruled a tiny sliver of the coast and left the rest of their nominal possessions alone.

    At any rate, during colonization the question was not to leave the Africans alone or colonize them, but which European power would conquer the most. See Fashoda, near-war between France and Britain, over who would control the Nile Valley.

    Short version of why France Committed Suicide: Feminism.

    Longer version: what happened in the post-War period was not a centuries long conspiracy by Jews to turn France into Cameroon meets Algeria; but women being pushed up into the Upper Class by the mass media advertising consumer market. Women make or influence 85% of purchases, so advertisers court them and ignore or demean men. And women pushed up in status invariably want a certain kind of man: stupid, dangerous, unpredictable, violent, and cruel. All qualities that are incompatible with White guys working for a living. A White guy won’t get far in the office acting that way.

    Feminism is NOT angry Man-Hating Lesbians (though they do tend to rise to the top). IF it were, feminism would not find so many female takers. Instead Feminism is the desire by Aristocratic and would be aristocratic women or upper class women to have as much sex with as many men as they want without censure in and outside of marriage. That’s why Gay Marriage is so popular, it means beta bucks and Alpha … Think Mary Wollstonecroft, mother of Mary Wollstonecroft Shelley. Aristocratic and Upper Class women in the Anglosphere with restrictions on public sex with whoever they want, bridling at the restrictions and wanting it all.

    Feminism and the French female contempt/hatred for their men, losers in both World Wars (there is nothing women hate more than a man who loses), with French women in WWII mostly sleeping with Germans, their men being able to do nothing but grin and bear it, made mass Third World Immigration possible.

    Someone asks why is Roissy important? Because HE NOTICES. He has an excellent post on Errol Flynn up today, short version there was not a woman alive married or not that would not sleep with him on any chance, no matter what the cost. Five minutes of Alpha beat a lifetime of marriage, even to other lesser Alphas. Flynn was debauched, stupid, risk taking for no real reason, violent, cruel, and untrustworthy. In short, a White guy acting like today’s Black rappers.

    Once women reach economic security on their own (inherited title and wealth, working in an office amidst consumer plenty), they demand that type of Flynn man — stupid and violent and unpredictable and cruel and dangerous. And will import them if their own men don’t suffice. Which they did. Mass immigration is very popular among White single women, not just for the cruelty and excitement it brings but for destroying the beta male among them.

    In my more pessimistic moods I don’t see much future for France or any White people. Their women will always HATE HATE HATE beta males, and want to write love poems to Chechen Bomb Brothers despite being married to big-deal famous authors with fawning fans. White women in the main will always want to import the Congo, or Pakistan, just to get that dominance and cruelty and stupidity (women hate nothing more than male intelligence, its abstract nature and focus repelling them predictably). And thus the advertising, consumerist, big company, financial/social/cultural forces will reinforce the voting habits and political control insuring a mass Third World tidal wave that is unstoppable.

    In my less pessimistic moods I look at Israel, afflicted for decades with pacifism utopia, one-world idiocies, Christian Heresies of Marxism, “anti-Racism” (anti-White) and so on. But decades of jihad erased nearly completely the Left, pacifists, etc. to outposts in the media and judiciary and nothing else. Fighting with non-Whites who want to kill them meant for survival, abandoning feminism even amidst consumer mass marketing messages aimed at women. Even women changed, wanting security from their own men and protection, rather than exiciting violent dominance from foreign ones. And their own men became more dominant in fighting — no one would confuse ex-Paratrooper Bibi Netanyahu or ex-Mossad Assassin/Secret Agent Ehud Barak with Pajama Boy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  39. I loved “Going Places”! And Bertrand Blier, the film’s director, is one of my favorite filmmakers ever, darn it.

    Oldie that I am, I was a student in France back in the early 1970s. Not only did I enjoy Blier’s movie when it was released, I was VERY surprised by the blitheness with which France was importing a lot of black African and north African immigrants. People just seemed to assume the policy was bound to work out well. And, heck, the French didn’t want to sweep their own streets or pick up their own garbage any longer, and someone had to … Meanwhile I was staring at the process thinking (even in my dim young mind), “You have got to be kidding.” Being in France watching this happen was the experience that highlighted to me the importance of immigration policy, and immigration policy has been an abiding interest of mine ever since.

    That said, I don’t think that anarchistic movies about roguish, goofy-but-sexy anti-heroes are to blame for the demographic predicament France has got herself into. Why would they be? In fact, Blier’s much more recent “Un, Deux Trois Soleil” is a kind of lament — a very quirky lament, admittedly — for what’s becoming of Europe. (Gaspar Noé’s even more extreme “Irreversible” is too, IMHO.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. Several non-mainstream French commentators have said the fact that Zemmour’s book is widely available, and that he is invited on all the important talk shows, indicates that his argument has some powerful establishment backers. This is obviously true. It’s really not possible to get a book published, publicized and sold widely without more than a few influential people telling the gatekeepers “it’s okay, he’s with me”. Walt & Mearsheimer’s “Israel Lobby” eventually got the nod in a similar way. I think people in power realize they have to at least appear to be good sports occasionally and sometimes a faction within the establishment actually welcomes a debate on policies that are no longer working for them. Zemmour’s book is useful for the second reason especially. The anti-majority coalition developed over the ’80s in France is falling apart violently and Zemmour’s book just might help to form a new, anti-Muslim one; or at least make it okay to question the official dogma surrounding the old arrangement.

    I did hear Zemmour say on one program that the Holocaust is discussed out of proportion to its importance, which is a pretty “out there” thing for anyone to say now days.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. slumber_j says:
    @Bert

    de Gaulle’s conservatism was different from conservatism elsewhere. He was attached more to the grandeur of the French nation, less to liberty and small government
     
    I love how this moron insinuates that conservatism is somehow intrinsically linked to small government. That's pretty much a purely American thing.

    De Gaulle was a French nationalist first and foremost.

    Caldwell did put it more categorically than he might have. But most or even all Anglophone countries have at least a strain of small-government conservatism; and he is writing for an English-speaking, mainly conservative readership. In any case, your assertion that “De Gaulle was a French nationalist first and foremost” is more or less what he’s saying, isn’t it?

    By the way, you may disagree with him, and he may get facts wrong from time to time–as all journalists do. But I used to know Chris Caldwell pretty well, and unless he’s gotten a lot less smart in the meantime, he most certainly is not a “moron.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @John
    GOOD TO READ ABOUT LE SUICIDE FRANÇAIS BY ZEMMOUR.

    First of all, this is good news that this book was written and is so popular.

    Maybe it will prod the gullible French to wake up from their slumber and stop voting for the libthugs who have destroyed their country.

    The fact that he is Jewish is good too. This is because the biggest groups that promote 3rd world immigration into white countries are Jewish.

    For instance, Jewish Barbara Lerner Spectre wants more 3rd world immigration into Sweden—despite the fact that these 3rd world immigrants are raping and killing white women, taking away jobs, adding to crime and congestion. But she did not care and wanted more of them.

    See:

    http://www.whyileftsweden.com/?p=198

    So it is good to see a Jewish person like Zemmour who is able to think independently and speak out against 3rd world immigration, the #1 weapon of the Jewish establishment.

    Hopefully, people will wake up and stop voting for left wing parties, like the Democratic party in USA, Labor in UK and instead vote for conservative parties that promise to ban immigration such as BNP, La Pen, etc. Another option is people must amend the constitution to allow binding superseding national referenda so they can ban immigration themselves. Eg. Ncid.us.

    Otherwise, whites will be killed, raped and murdered on the streets by the 3rd world invaders.

    Barbara Lerner Spectre doesn’t speak for ordinary Swedish Jews. They’re the ones fleeing Muslim violence in Malmo that is the result of the 3rd world immigration she supports. It is also the case that one of the leaders of the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats is Kent Ekeroth, a half-Jew.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @Hard Line Realist

    Each additional act of rape results in a baby and the joys of motherhood.
     
    Ahhh, so there are people who agree that it's about males who do not have many options gaining reproduction opportunities.

    Thanks for admitting it after all this time.

    Ahhh, so there are people who agree that it’s about males who do not have many options gaining reproduction opportunities.

    Thanks for admitting it after all this time.

    Yup. Except the satirists become a lynch mob when it comes to some little-known small town in Albion. :)

    The sword of sociobiology cuts both ways I guess.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. @Big Bill

    It could be argued by your logic, that, rape benefits the rape victim.
     
    So we are in agreement: colonialism is rape. Not wishing to be raped, I am against African and Hispanic colonialism in my country, the USA. Thank you for that very apt equivalence.

    So we are in agreement: colonialism is rape. Not wishing to be raped, I am against African and Hispanic colonialism in my country, the USA. Thank you for that very apt equivalence.

    No no no no no buddy… you’ve got it all muddled up.

    In your case it was NOT rape as it was CONSENSUAL.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Horzabky says:

    “Les Valseuses” (or, “Going Places” if you prefer) convey the atmosphere of some parts of France in the 70s. The ‘heroes’ are what we called zonards: half-losers, half-delinquents, the guys from la zone (the wrong side of the tracks, in the USA). I knew guys similar to them when I was a teenager, in the 70s. They were not necessarily the dumbest, but certainly the clumsiest, doomed to fail, maybe 5% of French youths, who were still nearly all white by then. They often acted stupidly, but very few of them were really evil.

    As usual, the left (including Bertrand Blier) saw them as progressive, oppressed rebels against the stuffy conservativeness of French society (as is obvious in the film). The French left (and anyone who considered himself/herself smart) utterly despised France.

    The zonards were the kind of young guys you would meet, if you were a French high-school student, as friends of friends. In bars, they would tell you about their magouilles (illicit methods of earning money, from peddling weed to stealing from their employer, if they happened to have a job, usually a temporary one). Oddly enough, a few of them had strong conservative views, and political sympathy for Jean-Marie Le Pen (who usually gathered about 0.3% of the votes).

    Gérard Depardieu recently told how he had his first paid job at 10, doing BJ’s to grown-up men… He was, later, a delinquent zonard himself. French trash indeed, but it was our trash… The less than 5% of us who were failures. Much later, Depardieu became a rich friend of Sarkozy, and then of Putin… He despises France, considering some of his recent actions, and I can’t blame him. Well done, Gérard. But don’t drink too much: that’s the loser in you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Right, it was inspiring to see Depardieu come out of the scum of the streets to displace De Niro in the early to mid 1980s as the greatest actor in the world for a few years in movies like "Danton." It was a triumph of the civilizing mission of French culture. Now he's regressing back to where he started. But it was glorious for a few years.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Horzabky
    "Les Valseuses" (or, "Going Places" if you prefer) convey the atmosphere of some parts of France in the 70s. The 'heroes' are what we called zonards: half-losers, half-delinquents, the guys from la zone (the wrong side of the tracks, in the USA). I knew guys similar to them when I was a teenager, in the 70s. They were not necessarily the dumbest, but certainly the clumsiest, doomed to fail, maybe 5% of French youths, who were still nearly all white by then. They often acted stupidly, but very few of them were really evil.

    As usual, the left (including Bertrand Blier) saw them as progressive, oppressed rebels against the stuffy conservativeness of French society (as is obvious in the film). The French left (and anyone who considered himself/herself smart) utterly despised France.

    The zonards were the kind of young guys you would meet, if you were a French high-school student, as friends of friends. In bars, they would tell you about their magouilles (illicit methods of earning money, from peddling weed to stealing from their employer, if they happened to have a job, usually a temporary one). Oddly enough, a few of them had strong conservative views, and political sympathy for Jean-Marie Le Pen (who usually gathered about 0.3% of the votes).

    Gérard Depardieu recently told how he had his first paid job at 10, doing BJ's to grown-up men... He was, later, a delinquent zonard himself. French trash indeed, but it was our trash... The less than 5% of us who were failures. Much later, Depardieu became a rich friend of Sarkozy, and then of Putin... He despises France, considering some of his recent actions, and I can't blame him. Well done, Gérard. But don't drink too much: that's the loser in you.

    Right, it was inspiring to see Depardieu come out of the scum of the streets to displace De Niro in the early to mid 1980s as the greatest actor in the world for a few years in movies like “Danton.” It was a triumph of the civilizing mission of French culture. Now he’s regressing back to where he started. But it was glorious for a few years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Horzabky says:

    @ gu

    Anti-semitism has deep roots in Muslim culture. I once heard a Moroccan woman blame jihadism on Quran falsifications made by Jews. Dieudonné has a white French mother and a black Cameroonian father. He became an anti-semite after disputes with Jews in the entertainment industry (he began his career in entertainment with a Jewish partner) and for some unknown reason his resentment agains the Jews has become extreme. Alain Soral is more like an old-fashioned French anti-semite who adheres to the weird idea that without Jewish malevolence, White Gentiles, Blacks and Muslims would all get along. I read one of Soral’s books and I watched several of his videos. Basically, Soral’s message ito Black and Muslims is: You are not the bad guys, the Jews are. It’s a very enticing message to the young Blacks and Muslims who notice that most criminals are Blacks and Muslims, and who don’t like the idea of being the bad guys. Soral also has many White followers, who agree with his message that mass immigration, moral decay, etc, are the result of Jewish machinations. You only have to watch a few Bernard-Henri Lévy videos to be sure of that, right?

    Soral manages to do amazing things. Recently, an 85 year old Holocaust denier named Faurisson was tried in Paris. Young Black males, alerted by Soral, spontaneously acted as Faurisson’s bodyguards against the possibility of an attack by Jewish militants.

    @ Bemused
    You asked: « How much of this breakdown has to do with Muslim immigration and Jewish phonies like your neighbor, and how much of it has to do with native Gallic libertinism? »

    Gallic libertinism (or whatever name you give it) is, in my opinion, the root cause. It is the same suicidal tendency we see at work in Sweden. Jewish intellectuals accelerated the mass immigration process, but it would have happened without them, as in Norway or Sweden.

    In my opinion, East Asian nations like South Korea and Japan are hostile to mass immigration for one reason: East Asian men know that they would lose their women if they allowed foreigners to enter the country en masse.

    There will be no French renaissance, because in a generation or two, France will no longer be a White nation with an average IQ of 100, but a Third World nation with an average IQ of 90. Ten IQ points, that’s not much, but it’s what makes Detroit and Vancouver so different (although I suspect that it’s more like 80/100, since most of the relatively smart, employable Blacks have left Detroit).

    Zemmour says what he thinks. And maybe he realizes something, before everyone else: for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. When the USA has a non-White majority, and a significant, politically influential Muslim minority, Jews won’t be safe even in the USA. Israel won’t survive without American support, and what Black or Hispanic US president will still support Israel, if he doesn’t need the White Zionist vote anymore?

    There’s Australia and New Zealand, but who knows what they will look like twenty or thirty years from now?

    Read More
    • Replies: @WhatEvvs
    "for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. "

    Yes, he's like Pim Fortuyn in that respect, whose homosexuality and keen intellect sensitized him to the problem. Fortuyn was smart enough to realize that a conservative Western culture, even a "homophobic" one, was far preferable to an Islamic one.

    Well....I am more optimistic than you, but maybe because I know less about the situation. And I still have my hopes for the USA.
    , @Twinkie

    In my opinion, East Asian nations like South Korea and Japan are hostile to mass immigration for one reason: East Asian men know that they would lose their women if they allowed foreigners to enter the country en masse.
     
    1. There is considerable migration (mostly illegal) from the Global South to East Asia now. In South Korea, I believe 1 in 5 child born is from an "international marriage."

    2. East Asian men are not concerned about "losing their women." Most East Asian women (want to) marry East Asian men (just like white American women still marry white American men in vast numbers/percentages). Men who obsess about "losing women" are usually losers who have trouble attracting women in the first place.


    When the USA has a non-White majority
     
    You seem not to understand the definition of the world "majority." First of all, linear demographic projections are frequently faulty. Second, maybe all non-whites are the same to you, but they are not to each other and even in a country where the whites are a minority, they may still be a plurality. That's a not welcome prospect for America, to be sure, but the picture of a country with a white minority and an indistinguishable mass of "nonwhite" majority is not an accurate one. There IS a difference between, say, a South Africa with 5% whites and 90% blacks and a potential America where whites are 45%, blacks are 10%, Hispanics are 30% and Asians are 10%. Understand, I in no way welcome such a prospect but "a majority of the minority" is a term in contradiction.
    , @Southfarthing

    And maybe he realizes something, before everyone else: for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. When the USA has a non-White majority, and a significant, politically influential Muslim minority, Jews won’t be safe even in the USA. Israel won’t survive without American support, and what Black or Hispanic US president will still support Israel, if he doesn’t need the White Zionist vote anymore?
     
    Right, it's easier to convince people who are sensitive about persecution.

    Jews' incentives are strongly aligned against immigration.

    Ezra Klein called it "horrifying" that a poll showed 1 in 6 "French" people support ISIS. He hasn't yet realized the connection between his insane positions on Michael Brown and the support for ISIS. Klein needs to read Eric Zemmour's book.

    Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban are thinking in terms of the next 5 years, while ignoring the next 50 years.

    , @Stone Garden

    Anti-semitism has deep roots in Muslim culture.
     
    Anti-anti-semitism is a lucrative career prospect in a Jew ruled world. Smart choice, chap!

    Basically, Soral’s message ito Black and Muslims is: You are not the bad guys, the Jews are.
     
    In the US, the Jew used Blacks as a battering ram against Whites, in what was essentially a power struggle between Jews and WASPs for ethnic supremacy.

    Nowadays the Jew does not need color anymore, or should we say, he realized that his tools had a mind of their own. So now, he using his White tools against blacks, Muslims etc.. there are a lot of them commenting in this site.

    I find it quite ironic that a White dude like Soral is actually giving the Jews a taste of their own medicine.

    What goes around, comes around. ;)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. WhatEvvs [AKA "Bemused"] says:
    @Horzabky
    @ gu

    Anti-semitism has deep roots in Muslim culture. I once heard a Moroccan woman blame jihadism on Quran falsifications made by Jews. Dieudonné has a white French mother and a black Cameroonian father. He became an anti-semite after disputes with Jews in the entertainment industry (he began his career in entertainment with a Jewish partner) and for some unknown reason his resentment agains the Jews has become extreme. Alain Soral is more like an old-fashioned French anti-semite who adheres to the weird idea that without Jewish malevolence, White Gentiles, Blacks and Muslims would all get along. I read one of Soral’s books and I watched several of his videos. Basically, Soral’s message ito Black and Muslims is: You are not the bad guys, the Jews are. It’s a very enticing message to the young Blacks and Muslims who notice that most criminals are Blacks and Muslims, and who don’t like the idea of being the bad guys. Soral also has many White followers, who agree with his message that mass immigration, moral decay, etc, are the result of Jewish machinations. You only have to watch a few Bernard-Henri Lévy videos to be sure of that, right?

    Soral manages to do amazing things. Recently, an 85 year old Holocaust denier named Faurisson was tried in Paris. Young Black males, alerted by Soral, spontaneously acted as Faurisson’s bodyguards against the possibility of an attack by Jewish militants.

    @ Bemused
    You asked: « How much of this breakdown has to do with Muslim immigration and Jewish phonies like your neighbor, and how much of it has to do with native Gallic libertinism? »

    Gallic libertinism (or whatever name you give it) is, in my opinion, the root cause. It is the same suicidal tendency we see at work in Sweden. Jewish intellectuals accelerated the mass immigration process, but it would have happened without them, as in Norway or Sweden.

    In my opinion, East Asian nations like South Korea and Japan are hostile to mass immigration for one reason: East Asian men know that they would lose their women if they allowed foreigners to enter the country en masse.

    There will be no French renaissance, because in a generation or two, France will no longer be a White nation with an average IQ of 100, but a Third World nation with an average IQ of 90. Ten IQ points, that’s not much, but it’s what makes Detroit and Vancouver so different (although I suspect that it’s more like 80/100, since most of the relatively smart, employable Blacks have left Detroit).

    Zemmour says what he thinks. And maybe he realizes something, before everyone else: for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. When the USA has a non-White majority, and a significant, politically influential Muslim minority, Jews won’t be safe even in the USA. Israel won’t survive without American support, and what Black or Hispanic US president will still support Israel, if he doesn’t need the White Zionist vote anymore?

    There’s Australia and New Zealand, but who knows what they will look like twenty or thirty years from now?

    “for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. ”

    Yes, he’s like Pim Fortuyn in that respect, whose homosexuality and keen intellect sensitized him to the problem. Fortuyn was smart enough to realize that a conservative Western culture, even a “homophobic” one, was far preferable to an Islamic one.

    Well….I am more optimistic than you, but maybe because I know less about the situation. And I still have my hopes for the USA.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Twinkie says:
    @Horzabky
    @ gu

    Anti-semitism has deep roots in Muslim culture. I once heard a Moroccan woman blame jihadism on Quran falsifications made by Jews. Dieudonné has a white French mother and a black Cameroonian father. He became an anti-semite after disputes with Jews in the entertainment industry (he began his career in entertainment with a Jewish partner) and for some unknown reason his resentment agains the Jews has become extreme. Alain Soral is more like an old-fashioned French anti-semite who adheres to the weird idea that without Jewish malevolence, White Gentiles, Blacks and Muslims would all get along. I read one of Soral’s books and I watched several of his videos. Basically, Soral’s message ito Black and Muslims is: You are not the bad guys, the Jews are. It’s a very enticing message to the young Blacks and Muslims who notice that most criminals are Blacks and Muslims, and who don’t like the idea of being the bad guys. Soral also has many White followers, who agree with his message that mass immigration, moral decay, etc, are the result of Jewish machinations. You only have to watch a few Bernard-Henri Lévy videos to be sure of that, right?

    Soral manages to do amazing things. Recently, an 85 year old Holocaust denier named Faurisson was tried in Paris. Young Black males, alerted by Soral, spontaneously acted as Faurisson’s bodyguards against the possibility of an attack by Jewish militants.

    @ Bemused
    You asked: « How much of this breakdown has to do with Muslim immigration and Jewish phonies like your neighbor, and how much of it has to do with native Gallic libertinism? »

    Gallic libertinism (or whatever name you give it) is, in my opinion, the root cause. It is the same suicidal tendency we see at work in Sweden. Jewish intellectuals accelerated the mass immigration process, but it would have happened without them, as in Norway or Sweden.

    In my opinion, East Asian nations like South Korea and Japan are hostile to mass immigration for one reason: East Asian men know that they would lose their women if they allowed foreigners to enter the country en masse.

    There will be no French renaissance, because in a generation or two, France will no longer be a White nation with an average IQ of 100, but a Third World nation with an average IQ of 90. Ten IQ points, that’s not much, but it’s what makes Detroit and Vancouver so different (although I suspect that it’s more like 80/100, since most of the relatively smart, employable Blacks have left Detroit).

    Zemmour says what he thinks. And maybe he realizes something, before everyone else: for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. When the USA has a non-White majority, and a significant, politically influential Muslim minority, Jews won’t be safe even in the USA. Israel won’t survive without American support, and what Black or Hispanic US president will still support Israel, if he doesn’t need the White Zionist vote anymore?

    There’s Australia and New Zealand, but who knows what they will look like twenty or thirty years from now?

    In my opinion, East Asian nations like South Korea and Japan are hostile to mass immigration for one reason: East Asian men know that they would lose their women if they allowed foreigners to enter the country en masse.

    1. There is considerable migration (mostly illegal) from the Global South to East Asia now. In South Korea, I believe 1 in 5 child born is from an “international marriage.”

    2. East Asian men are not concerned about “losing their women.” Most East Asian women (want to) marry East Asian men (just like white American women still marry white American men in vast numbers/percentages). Men who obsess about “losing women” are usually losers who have trouble attracting women in the first place.

    When the USA has a non-White majority

    You seem not to understand the definition of the world “majority.” First of all, linear demographic projections are frequently faulty. Second, maybe all non-whites are the same to you, but they are not to each other and even in a country where the whites are a minority, they may still be a plurality. That’s a not welcome prospect for America, to be sure, but the picture of a country with a white minority and an indistinguishable mass of “nonwhite” majority is not an accurate one. There IS a difference between, say, a South Africa with 5% whites and 90% blacks and a potential America where whites are 45%, blacks are 10%, Hispanics are 30% and Asians are 10%. Understand, I in no way welcome such a prospect but “a majority of the minority” is a term in contradiction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. @Horzabky
    @ gu

    Anti-semitism has deep roots in Muslim culture. I once heard a Moroccan woman blame jihadism on Quran falsifications made by Jews. Dieudonné has a white French mother and a black Cameroonian father. He became an anti-semite after disputes with Jews in the entertainment industry (he began his career in entertainment with a Jewish partner) and for some unknown reason his resentment agains the Jews has become extreme. Alain Soral is more like an old-fashioned French anti-semite who adheres to the weird idea that without Jewish malevolence, White Gentiles, Blacks and Muslims would all get along. I read one of Soral’s books and I watched several of his videos. Basically, Soral’s message ito Black and Muslims is: You are not the bad guys, the Jews are. It’s a very enticing message to the young Blacks and Muslims who notice that most criminals are Blacks and Muslims, and who don’t like the idea of being the bad guys. Soral also has many White followers, who agree with his message that mass immigration, moral decay, etc, are the result of Jewish machinations. You only have to watch a few Bernard-Henri Lévy videos to be sure of that, right?

    Soral manages to do amazing things. Recently, an 85 year old Holocaust denier named Faurisson was tried in Paris. Young Black males, alerted by Soral, spontaneously acted as Faurisson’s bodyguards against the possibility of an attack by Jewish militants.

    @ Bemused
    You asked: « How much of this breakdown has to do with Muslim immigration and Jewish phonies like your neighbor, and how much of it has to do with native Gallic libertinism? »

    Gallic libertinism (or whatever name you give it) is, in my opinion, the root cause. It is the same suicidal tendency we see at work in Sweden. Jewish intellectuals accelerated the mass immigration process, but it would have happened without them, as in Norway or Sweden.

    In my opinion, East Asian nations like South Korea and Japan are hostile to mass immigration for one reason: East Asian men know that they would lose their women if they allowed foreigners to enter the country en masse.

    There will be no French renaissance, because in a generation or two, France will no longer be a White nation with an average IQ of 100, but a Third World nation with an average IQ of 90. Ten IQ points, that’s not much, but it’s what makes Detroit and Vancouver so different (although I suspect that it’s more like 80/100, since most of the relatively smart, employable Blacks have left Detroit).

    Zemmour says what he thinks. And maybe he realizes something, before everyone else: for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. When the USA has a non-White majority, and a significant, politically influential Muslim minority, Jews won’t be safe even in the USA. Israel won’t survive without American support, and what Black or Hispanic US president will still support Israel, if he doesn’t need the White Zionist vote anymore?

    There’s Australia and New Zealand, but who knows what they will look like twenty or thirty years from now?

    And maybe he realizes something, before everyone else: for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. When the USA has a non-White majority, and a significant, politically influential Muslim minority, Jews won’t be safe even in the USA. Israel won’t survive without American support, and what Black or Hispanic US president will still support Israel, if he doesn’t need the White Zionist vote anymore?

    Right, it’s easier to convince people who are sensitive about persecution.

    Jews’ incentives are strongly aligned against immigration.

    Ezra Klein called it “horrifying” that a poll showed 1 in 6 “French” people support ISIS. He hasn’t yet realized the connection between his insane positions on Michael Brown and the support for ISIS. Klein needs to read Eric Zemmour’s book.

    Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban are thinking in terms of the next 5 years, while ignoring the next 50 years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @Horzabky
    @ gu

    Anti-semitism has deep roots in Muslim culture. I once heard a Moroccan woman blame jihadism on Quran falsifications made by Jews. Dieudonné has a white French mother and a black Cameroonian father. He became an anti-semite after disputes with Jews in the entertainment industry (he began his career in entertainment with a Jewish partner) and for some unknown reason his resentment agains the Jews has become extreme. Alain Soral is more like an old-fashioned French anti-semite who adheres to the weird idea that without Jewish malevolence, White Gentiles, Blacks and Muslims would all get along. I read one of Soral’s books and I watched several of his videos. Basically, Soral’s message ito Black and Muslims is: You are not the bad guys, the Jews are. It’s a very enticing message to the young Blacks and Muslims who notice that most criminals are Blacks and Muslims, and who don’t like the idea of being the bad guys. Soral also has many White followers, who agree with his message that mass immigration, moral decay, etc, are the result of Jewish machinations. You only have to watch a few Bernard-Henri Lévy videos to be sure of that, right?

    Soral manages to do amazing things. Recently, an 85 year old Holocaust denier named Faurisson was tried in Paris. Young Black males, alerted by Soral, spontaneously acted as Faurisson’s bodyguards against the possibility of an attack by Jewish militants.

    @ Bemused
    You asked: « How much of this breakdown has to do with Muslim immigration and Jewish phonies like your neighbor, and how much of it has to do with native Gallic libertinism? »

    Gallic libertinism (or whatever name you give it) is, in my opinion, the root cause. It is the same suicidal tendency we see at work in Sweden. Jewish intellectuals accelerated the mass immigration process, but it would have happened without them, as in Norway or Sweden.

    In my opinion, East Asian nations like South Korea and Japan are hostile to mass immigration for one reason: East Asian men know that they would lose their women if they allowed foreigners to enter the country en masse.

    There will be no French renaissance, because in a generation or two, France will no longer be a White nation with an average IQ of 100, but a Third World nation with an average IQ of 90. Ten IQ points, that’s not much, but it’s what makes Detroit and Vancouver so different (although I suspect that it’s more like 80/100, since most of the relatively smart, employable Blacks have left Detroit).

    Zemmour says what he thinks. And maybe he realizes something, before everyone else: for French Jews like him, there will be no place to go in a few decades. When the USA has a non-White majority, and a significant, politically influential Muslim minority, Jews won’t be safe even in the USA. Israel won’t survive without American support, and what Black or Hispanic US president will still support Israel, if he doesn’t need the White Zionist vote anymore?

    There’s Australia and New Zealand, but who knows what they will look like twenty or thirty years from now?

    Anti-semitism has deep roots in Muslim culture.

    Anti-anti-semitism is a lucrative career prospect in a Jew ruled world. Smart choice, chap!

    Basically, Soral’s message ito Black and Muslims is: You are not the bad guys, the Jews are.

    In the US, the Jew used Blacks as a battering ram against Whites, in what was essentially a power struggle between Jews and WASPs for ethnic supremacy.

    Nowadays the Jew does not need color anymore, or should we say, he realized that his tools had a mind of their own. So now, he using his White tools against blacks, Muslims etc.. there are a lot of them commenting in this site.

    I find it quite ironic that a White dude like Soral is actually giving the Jews a taste of their own medicine.

    What goes around, comes around. ;)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    If kumbayah Jews hadn't helped set up the NAACP, kumbayah Christians and liberals would have a few years later.

    We can test that by checking how people like Bill Gates are spending their billions (to increase population growth in Africa).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. TB2 [AKA "JohnB"] says:

    Le Suicide Francais began when they started importing the shitty culture of the Etats-Unis, just like the rest of Europe. Particularly when they swallowed the propaganda about “Civil Rights” and other racial fairy tales.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. Moderator.

    May I know why my last comment censored?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Stone Garden

    Anti-semitism has deep roots in Muslim culture.
     
    Anti-anti-semitism is a lucrative career prospect in a Jew ruled world. Smart choice, chap!

    Basically, Soral’s message ito Black and Muslims is: You are not the bad guys, the Jews are.
     
    In the US, the Jew used Blacks as a battering ram against Whites, in what was essentially a power struggle between Jews and WASPs for ethnic supremacy.

    Nowadays the Jew does not need color anymore, or should we say, he realized that his tools had a mind of their own. So now, he using his White tools against blacks, Muslims etc.. there are a lot of them commenting in this site.

    I find it quite ironic that a White dude like Soral is actually giving the Jews a taste of their own medicine.

    What goes around, comes around. ;)

    If kumbayah Jews hadn’t helped set up the NAACP, kumbayah Christians and liberals would have a few years later.

    We can test that by checking how people like Bill Gates are spending their billions (to increase population growth in Africa).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation