The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
BBC: "EU Should 'Undermine National Homogeneity' Says UN Migration Chief"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Here’s an oldie-but-goodie from the BBC, c. 2012:

EU should ‘undermine national homogeneity’ says UN migration chief

By Brian Wheeler
Political reporter, BBC News

21 June 2012

The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.

Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.

He also suggested the UK government’s immigration policy had no basis in international law.

He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.

Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.

He told the House of Lords committee migration was a “crucial dynamic for economic growth” in some EU nations “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states”.

Those moron citizens keep responding to our inarguable assertions with “facts” and “logic” instead of just admitting we’re smarter than them.

An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.

“It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”

The UN special representative on migration was also quizzed about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.

He told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.

“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”

Mr Sutherland recently argued, in a lecture to the London School of Economics, of which he is chairman, that there was a “shift from states selecting migrants to migrants selecting states” and the EU’s ability to compete at a “global level” was at risk.

… Mr Sutherland, a former Attorney General of Ireland, agreed, saying: “Absolutely not. it provides absolutely no justification at all for the position they are talking about.”

He said the policy risked Britain’s traditional status as “tolerant, open society” and would be “massively damaging” to its higher education sector both financially and intellectually.

“It’s very important that we should not send a signal from this country, either to potential students of the highest quality, or to academic staff, that this is in some way an unsympathetic environment in which to seek visas or whatever other permissions are required… and I would be fearful that that could be a signal.”

Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group , a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy, called on EU states to stop targeting “highly skilled” migrants, arguing that “at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice” about whether to come and study or work in another country.

Mr Sutherland also briefed the peers on plans for the Global Migration and Development Forum’s next annual conference in Mauritius in November, adding: “The UK has been very constructively engaged in this whole process from the beginning and very supportive of me personally.”

Who is Peter Sutherland? Here’s a 2012 column in The Daily Mail by the somewhat improbably named Sebastian Shakespeare:

The questions Peter Sutherland, the globe’s grandee, was NOT asked by the Lords EU sub-committee
PUBLISHED: 15:01 EST, 27 June 2012

How perfect it is when principle and profit coincide. How convenient when your cherished beliefs slot in smoothly with the Zeitgeist, and you can simultaneously top up your self-esteem and your bank balance with a completely clear conscience. How agreeable to have powerful friends, to be powerful oneself, and all this in the name of the un-powerful – to be a Gracchus for the globe, beloved by the people – and safely distant from them.

On 21 June Peter Sutherland, KCMG, SC, UN Special Representative on Migration, sat massively opposite a House of Lords EU affairs sub-committee, a soft-faced man who has done very well indeed out of the culture wars. His erstwhile rugby-playing physique may be collapsing in on itself, but still he faced forward, safe in an armature of absolute self-belief and the certainty that he is on the side of History.

But then why shouldn’t he be certain? His dazzling trajectory, his gilt-edged address book, his multiple doctorates and directorships, and the seriousness with which his opinions are invariably greeted all attest to a life shrewdly spent – 66 years of weighing down the Western boat without ever rocking it.

Sutherland, a former Attorney General of Ireland, former or present director of blue-chip companies and permanent member of international think-tanks, is like an ungainly piece of inherited furniture, a teak-oiled trophy cabinet full of meretricious treasures. He holds in his stubby hands an honorary British knighthood – the European Parliament’s Gold Medal – the Grand Cross of Civil Merit (Spain) – the Grand Cross of King Leopold II (Belgium) – Grand Cross of the Order of Infante Dom Henrique (Portugal) – the Legion d’Honneur – the Brazilian Order of Rio Branco – and yet more others, a glinting cascade of gold-coloured base-metal tributes. …

Note distorted skull in foreground

His has been the life of a man of parts, one who walks and talks with the great, reminiscent of one of Holbein’s Ambassadors, surrounded by measuring instruments and all the external signs of extreme cultivation, peering down on human affairs from a great height. Yet Mr. Sutherland’s manicured machinations could prove calamitous for what remains of the West – just as Holbein includes a distorted skull to remind the viewer that all rational hopes are in vain. …

Born in Dublin in 1946, he was educated at the Jesuit-run Gonzaga College – named after a 16th century Italian nobleman canonized for giving up his life to minister to plague victims, a sacrifice luckily not demanded of the bright and ambitious pupil. He studied law at University College Dublin, the Catholic intellectual riposte to the traditionally Protestant Trinity College. He practiced at the Irish Bar between 1969 and 1980, toiling in the Georgian magnificence of Dublin’s King’s Inns.

He simultaneously became involved with Fine Gael (‘Tribe of the Gaels’), one of Ireland’s Buggin’s Turn parties of state, and although the highest vote he ever obtained in any election was a lowly 6.2%, he made it up to the disappointed voters by becoming Ireland’s youngest ever Attorney General in 1981.

Tiring of law at last, he joined the board of Allied Irish Bank, rising to chairman. Although he has more recently described himself as ‘passionately Irish’, in the Eighties he was apparently not content to ‘fumble in a greasy till / And add the halfpence to the pence’ (W. B. Yeats, September 1913) on behalf of the tribe of the Gaels.

His sights were set instead on the purlieus of la Belge, and in 1984 he became the youngest ever European Commissioner, one of those bland mini-potentates whose precise purpose is so mysterious that their appointment cannot be entrusted to ignorant voters. Here he greased the gears of the incipient European single market and made useful (if perhaps not very interesting) friends, who assisted him to become Director General first of GATT and then the World Trade Organisation. A starstruck Michael Kantor would later dub him ‘the father of globalization’.

Central to his grand schemes were, and are, international finance, air and oil – and as good luck would have it, he was soon invited to join the boards of Delta Airlines, BP and Goldman Sachs. His insights were soon being sought by, and all too often delivered to, a plethora of organizations feared by conspiracists – Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, World Economic Forum, Pilgrims Society – although perhaps such groups should be feared more for their narcoleptic than their necromantic powers. …

Whilst Chairman, BP signed a £545m oil deal with Libya, and he was present on the notorious 2007 occasion when Tony Blair was photographed embracing Colonel Gaddafi. …

His reserve was not resented by the Gaddafi family, because subsequently the Colonel’s son graciously accepted a PhD from the London School of Economics (Chair of Council: P. Sutherland) and gave the School £1.5m. A £2.2m government contract with the LSE to train the Libyan civil service may not have been entirely unconnected with these transactions.

Perhaps this mutually agreeable but officially frowned-upon alliance might have continued to this day had not Libya’s liberal idealists meted out rougher-than-strictly-necessary justice last year in Sirte.

Sad to record, in the last two years of Peter’s BP chairmanship (he left in 2010) ungrateful shareholders even argued he was not qualified for the job, as he had been a member of the board of the Royal Bank of Scotland, and on the RBS remuneration committee which was so generous to Sir Fred Goodwin and other equally deserving recipients – ‘resigning’ only when ‘asked’ by the government.

Suchlike perils of greatness were thankfully always counterbalanced by acknowledgements of his usefulness to that cosy world where law, liberalism and lucre meet – with even the un-liberal Vatican clamoring for his services (he has the resounding title of Consultor of the Extraordinary Section of the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See). To add to this sacerdotal seal of approval, there have always been plentiful profane rewards – such as the £125 million he reportedly ‘earned’ from Goldman Sachs 1999 flotation.

But the money was always incidental to the greater aim of getting rid of all those pesky prehistoric frontiers, traditions and identities which impede the global flows of capital, commodities, human rights lawyers, pictures of celebrities in thongs, and humans in throngs. As he remarked almost angrily in 2007, opposition to greater globalisation is ‘morally indefensible’.

The morally defensible, personally charming, highly intelligent, ‘passionately Irish’ grand panjandrum of globalization actually seems to be out of love with Irishness…also Englishness, Frenchness, Germannness, Italianness, and all the other nationalities which make up European-ness – to the extent that he would quite like to see them disappear. He has said that ‘Europe for me is the most noble political process in 1,000 years’, and he would dearly love to be the über-European – yet his ideal Europe might not have all that many indigenous Europeans. Europe for him seems not to be a place where Europeans live, but a wholly abstract entity, an entry in a balance sheet.

That is why he was peering at the House of Lords sub-committee like some well-fed but still peckish bird of prey, looking at the parochial parliamentarians from their dusty old-fashioned legislature – perhaps contrasting them unfavourably with the big-picture bureaucrats of his Global Forum on Migration and Development. He was there to answer questions about the government’s immigration policies – and from the outset it was plain that he disapproved. And not just of the policy – but Britain’s whole political structure, culture and national identity – all now, he broadly hinted, overripe for replacement.

… In any case, it came as little surprise to learn that he advocates a global approach to get rid of these dirty differences – an approach based on a wonderfully simple, wildly reckless premise – ‘…at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice.’

No-one enquired whether existing residents of countries would also have the freedom to choose what kind of country they lived in – nor whether he foresaw any kind of limits on human traffic from Asia or Africa into small countries like his own (pop. 3 million). Yeats bemoaned that ‘Romantic Ireland’s dead and gone’ – but if Mr. Sutherland and his many mini-mes have their way unromantic Ireland might soon follow.

Nor was he asked whether he thought it possible that unlimited migration might endanger the ‘tolerant, easy’ characteristics he and most other Europeans value – nor whether his manic métissage might make the whole world rather less interesting and beautiful. Although he will be leaving the world a very much richer man than he entered it, the world he leaves behind will probably be poorer, in ways he cannot begin to comprehend.

In 2015, Sutherland became the chairman of the International Catholic Migration Commission.

This week Sutherland visited the encampment in Calais of migrants attempting to flee France’s war, genocide, and weak Euro for refuge in London. Independent Catholic News reported on the Irish Catholic dignitary’s visit to this camp of the saints:

UN Representative visits Calais ‘Jungle’
Phil Kerton
Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:42 pm.

Further to ICN’s “Eyewitness” report on 20th September, Peter Sutherland, the UN Secretary General’s Special Representative for Refugees since 2006, current President of the International Catholic Migration Commission, and former Attorney General of Eire, visited Calais on Monday 21 September. His current UN work is centred around the Mediterranean, but he needed to find out what becomes of exiles when they have moved north.

Here are the horrified tweets posted by this experienced observer on that day, and subsequently:

21st September

Today I am in the camp in Calais. The conditions are appalling (about 3pm)

The camp is squalid and unacceptable. There are about 3000 in the camp and the majority are refugees. How can govs allow this to persist? (about 5pm)

They are in France but are determined to get into the UK. Why can’t the two govs accelerate the asylum process together (about 6pm)

a) The ones deserving credit in Calais are the French and British mini charities who compensate for terrible government inaction
b) Intergovernmental agreements on migrants are all about security. A pity a portion is not spent on the poor migrants in particular in Calais (about 7pm)

a) The first thing the EU should do now is to help the front line States Lebanon Turkey and Jordan by accepting resettlement of refugees.
b) The second thing is all the MS should be reminded strongly that membership of the EU requires common values and internal solidarity
c) Common values require that asylum be given to refugees rather than meeting them with barbed wire and teargas (about 9pm)

22nd September

a) I cannot easily recover from the shock of Calais.the French and British governments should rapidly respond to the horrible conditions.
b) With the filth has come disease and the place is testimony to the desperation of the people in it. They deserve immediate action.
c) The Camp in Calais is a truly dreadful place. It is an indictment of society that it exists.Why have the media largely moved on? (about midnight)

 
Hide 92 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.

    “It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”

    Steve, you often tell us on various articles about stagnating wages or stressed resources to do a ctrl-F for the “I” word, immigration. On articles like this one about the doom and gloom of homogeneity and low birth rates being the end of Europe and North America, might I suggest you do a ctrl-F for the “J” word, Japan.

    Just like Trump recently told border fence naysayers to go ask Israel if fences work, our side in the open borders debate should start promoting Japan whose aging demographics and low birth rates mirror ours.

    • Replies: @Massimo Heitor

    Just like Trump recently told border fence naysayers to go ask Israel if fences work, our side in the open borders debate should start promoting Japan whose aging demographics and low birth rates mirror ours.
     
    I love Japan and Israel, I don't think they should be forced to commit demographic suicide, but I do think the political engine driving mass immigration is geared explicitly towards whites and turning the same logic on a non-white nation like Japan would break that dominant political mindset.

    Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies.
  2. Undermine the ethnic homogeneity of European countries and only European countries… Wow!

    Today in South Africa, FW De Klerk says, “President Zuma recently blamed all the problems of the country on the arrival in South Africa of Jan van Riebeeck. Statues of historic leaders from minority communities are daubed with paint and excrement. White South Africans are increasingly referred to as ‘colonialists’ – as though they are alien interlopers in their own country.”

    So whites in Africa and pretty much anywhere outside of Europe are colonialists, they don’t belong there, they are interlopers, they need to go back to Europe. And in Europe, it is paramount to undermine the premise of homogeneity. Wow, just wow…

    Of course, the pope and Obama won’t mention non-whites attacking whites or criticize non-whites defending their own ethnic culture and sovereignty.

    Why doesn’t everyone in this crowd just have eight+ children each? That would make you happier. It’s harder for politicians to take that away from you.

  3. I wonder if Europe will really go quietly into the great darkness of 3d world existence, rather than making corrupt traitors like Sutherland and Merkel into examples, “pour encourager les autres.” I would say it’s 50-50 at this point in time.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    But making any suggestion that this is so gets my comments censored.
    Funny dat
    , @Anonymo1
    What reason is there to believe there would be a "great darkness?". Wouldn't things just decline somewhat significantly - scientific patents per capita and income go down a bit, homicide rate goes up a bit, things like that?
  4. Since it is only a matter of time before every population will be aging and/or declining wouldn’t it make more sense for the most advanced societies to pioneer how best to deal with it? Automation (new labor-saving technologies) seems like the obvious way to go since there will be fewer people available to do society’s work. Isn’t this Japan’s approach?

    The alternative is to conceive of society as a ponzi scheme until the supply of dumb suckers runs out. At which point rioting begins.

  5. “Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.”

    Those meddling Goldman Sachs guys seem to be into everything.

  6. I remember reading how Bernadette Devlin pissed off IRA supporters in South Boston in the 70s when she came over and said she was more comfortable with the blacks in Roxbury than her Irish cousins in Southie. When your enemy is the racial supremacist Orangeman, I guess its natural to adopt an anti-ethno-nationalist ideology, so there is unfortunately an historical logic to Mr. Sutherland’s brand of multi-cultural stupidity among the politically conscious Irish. However, the pub people are a different story altogether, and the Irish well know that history is a nightmare from which we seek to awake; as Deasy in Nestor says , Ireland hasn’t persecuted the Jews because it never let them in. Swamp that island with brown and black Muslims and watch the brawlers come out. Set off a bomb, and I bet those mosques will remember real quick who taught em how to do it.

    • Replies: @gruff

    as Deasy in Nestor says , Ireland hasn’t persecuted the Jews because it never let them in.
     
    Look into what Alan Shatter got up to over the last few years.

    Swamp that island with brown and black Muslims and watch the brawlers come out.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balbriggan#Demographics
    , @Sue D. Nim
    From The Commitments:

    Jimmy Rabbitte: Do you not get it, lads?
    The Irish are the blacks of Europe.
    And Dubliners are the blacks of Ireland.
    And the Northside Dubliners are the blacks of Dublin.
    So say it once, say it loud: I'm black and I'm proud.
    , @langadic
    Eh? This must be the first time ever Bernadette Devlin and a classic South Dublin/Law Library product like Peter Sutherland have ever been lumped together.
  7. [addendum] At which point rioting begins, and civilization comes to an end.

  8. Here we have it, straight from the horse’s mouth. This is the real intent, no beating around the bush. He represents the thinking of much of the upper political class and now much of what’s been happening makes sense.

  9. @iSteveFan

    An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.

    “It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”
     

    Steve, you often tell us on various articles about stagnating wages or stressed resources to do a ctrl-F for the "I" word, immigration. On articles like this one about the doom and gloom of homogeneity and low birth rates being the end of Europe and North America, might I suggest you do a ctrl-F for the "J" word, Japan.

    Just like Trump recently told border fence naysayers to go ask Israel if fences work, our side in the open borders debate should start promoting Japan whose aging demographics and low birth rates mirror ours.

    Just like Trump recently told border fence naysayers to go ask Israel if fences work, our side in the open borders debate should start promoting Japan whose aging demographics and low birth rates mirror ours.

    I love Japan and Israel, I don’t think they should be forced to commit demographic suicide, but I do think the political engine driving mass immigration is geared explicitly towards whites and turning the same logic on a non-white nation like Japan would break that dominant political mindset.

    Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies.

    • Replies: @Maj. Kong
    Hitler's greatest WWII ally was Josef Stalin. Without Stalin's support for invading Poland, and supplying the Germans until 1941, the Fall of France would not have been possible.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_Border_and_Commercial_Agreement

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_settlement_in_the_Japanese_Empire

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre
    , @Perspective
    "Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies."

    So should Italy as well then. Most Japanese seem to logically believe that past guilt should not be transferred to future generations. They often see themselves as victims in WWII, which many were of course.
    , @AndrewR
    Japanese skin tone is, on average, no darker than Europeans, so it's pretty absurd to call them "non-white." One who values accuracy should say "non-European" instead.
    , @AnAnon
    He is saying that Japan is in pretty good shape for a nation totally doomed by demographics.
  10. So the guy who is possibly the world’s top globalist is an actual Scots-Irish. This is hilarious.

    (The last time you posted about him there were lots of people in the comments who just couldn’t believe he wasn’t Jewish, but this time the evidence seems overwhelming)

    • Replies: @Rifleman

    Who is Peter Sutherland?
     
    The most phenotypically Jewish/Semitic Irishman in history..

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!

    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate.

    Based on looks alone there seems almost no way this guy isn't of Jewish ancestry and only "Celtic". And the money and globalization issues....come on.

    Who knows.
    , @Matra
    So the guy who is possibly the world’s top globalist is an actual Scots-Irish.

    Where does it say that? He seems to be Irish Catholic. Maybe with a name like Sutherland he has some Anglo-Irish background too. I don't know. But there is nothing in his biography to suggest any connection to the Scots-Irish/Ulster-Scots or whatever you wish to call them.

    , @el topo
    He looks very Jewish. Hard to believe he doesn't have at least significant Jewish ancestry.
  11. it is just the ageless tactic of the elite–divide et impera…the more heterogeneous a nation, the more diffused and focused the public will….when the public cannot unite because of diversity, they cannot control their own government….and then the elites can have their way.

  12. @pyrrhus
    I wonder if Europe will really go quietly into the great darkness of 3d world existence, rather than making corrupt traitors like Sutherland and Merkel into examples, "pour encourager les autres." I would say it's 50-50 at this point in time.

    But making any suggestion that this is so gets my comments censored.
    Funny dat

  13. Can’t one of you smart people fix this insanity? I’m just a lone man. At least brainstorm some ideas?

    • Replies: @helena
    Well, there's the International Nascent European People's Territorial (INEPT) Army:

    On the frontline are the Southern American Baptists, burning books to intimidate the enemy;
    Behind them is a row of Sumo Dartsvolk, only the lager's run out so they can't hit sh*t;
    Some Irish spies are behind enemy lines, switching sides as soon as they're spotted;
    The Austro-Prussian Dressage team are befuddling the enemy by side-stepping their horses;
    On the flanks are centuries of burly Slavs marching determinedly forward behind their shields to form the 'horns of the buffalo', except there's only one flank and it's just been surrounded by even burlier young male 'refugees';
    The Norse-men went berzerk long ago and are nowhere to be seen;
    The French are still in their tents discussing 'Qui? Quim?';
    The Italians are catering corps, whipping up steamy capuccinos for the Commissioned Officers -
    Who are of course, Anglo-this and Anglo-that, each issued with the most powerful binoculars money can buy;

    In the centre stands the general, and a Fraulein by design, she has squandered our resistence for a pocketful of dumplings such as policies;
    All lies and jest, still, a man reads the Unz-Review and disregards the rest;
    Lie La Lie

  14. Steve, I presume you put that portrait in and its caption…
    just as Holbein includes a distorted skull to remind the viewer that all rational hopes are in vain. ….
    Wow, I’ve never seen that before. Was it common? Can you amplify?

    • Replies: @a reader
  15. @IHTG
    So the guy who is possibly the world's top globalist is an actual Scots-Irish. This is hilarious.

    (The last time you posted about him there were lots of people in the comments who just couldn't believe he wasn't Jewish, but this time the evidence seems overwhelming)

    Who is Peter Sutherland?

    The most phenotypically Jewish/Semitic Irishman in history..

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!

    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate.

    Based on looks alone there seems almost no way this guy isn’t of Jewish ancestry and only “Celtic”. And the money and globalization issues….come on.

    Who knows.

    • Replies: @SFG
    Well, he looks Jewish...but who knows?

    Steve does like to troll his commenters from time to time.
    , @Whiskey
    Did you even READ what Steve posted? He's CATHOLIC and part of lay organiztions. Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He's the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian. But go ahead blame Jews. Like Satan in the 14th Century its a universal, non falsifiable religious/magical/vodoo belief.

    You could well argue that the Catholic church is on the whole even worse for the West than Marxism.
    , @anon

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!
     
    Cultural Marxism is a thing. If you don't know about it then you're ignorant.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci

    The theory is quite simple: Gramsci said religion and patriotism prevented people adopting communism so cultural Marxists needed to stop open Communist political activity and infiltrate national institutions like the schools and media and once inside work to destroy religion and patriotism.

    That is how the culture war started.


    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate
     
    The globalist version of capitalism that has taken over the West since the 8os is in alliance with the cultural Marxist types and funds them because it helps them with importing cheap labor

    That's the key point about the current political situation; it's left *and* right against the middle because they both want nation states destroyed.

    , @WhatEvvs

    The most phenotypically Jewish/Semitic Irishman in history..

     

    In other words: "Put me on ignore. My opinions are the worthless rantings of a keyboard jockey loser."
  16. @Massimo Heitor

    Just like Trump recently told border fence naysayers to go ask Israel if fences work, our side in the open borders debate should start promoting Japan whose aging demographics and low birth rates mirror ours.
     
    I love Japan and Israel, I don't think they should be forced to commit demographic suicide, but I do think the political engine driving mass immigration is geared explicitly towards whites and turning the same logic on a non-white nation like Japan would break that dominant political mindset.

    Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies.

    Hitler’s greatest WWII ally was Josef Stalin. Without Stalin’s support for invading Poland, and supplying the Germans until 1941, the Fall of France would not have been possible.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_Border_and_Commercial_Agreement

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_settlement_in_the_Japanese_Empire

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre

  17. @Massimo Heitor

    Just like Trump recently told border fence naysayers to go ask Israel if fences work, our side in the open borders debate should start promoting Japan whose aging demographics and low birth rates mirror ours.
     
    I love Japan and Israel, I don't think they should be forced to commit demographic suicide, but I do think the political engine driving mass immigration is geared explicitly towards whites and turning the same logic on a non-white nation like Japan would break that dominant political mindset.

    Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies.

    “Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies.”

    So should Italy as well then. Most Japanese seem to logically believe that past guilt should not be transferred to future generations. They often see themselves as victims in WWII, which many were of course.

    • Replies: @Massimo Heitor

    So should Italy as well then. Most Japanese seem to logically believe that past guilt should not be transferred to future generations. They often see themselves as victims in WWII, which many were of course.
     
    Every major involved party had plenty of victims in WWII, Germans, British, US, they all had loses.

    AFAIK, the Italian populace broadly supported the Allies in WWII. There was a large Italian resistance movement that captured and executed Mussolini. Italian Americans were eager to fight for the US, and their loyalty wasn't questioned unlike German or Japanese Americans.

    It's interesting that

    In Mussolini's thinking, demography was destiny; nations with rising populations were nations destined to conquer, and nations with falling populations were decaying powers that deserved to die.
     
  18. @IHTG
    So the guy who is possibly the world's top globalist is an actual Scots-Irish. This is hilarious.

    (The last time you posted about him there were lots of people in the comments who just couldn't believe he wasn't Jewish, but this time the evidence seems overwhelming)

    So the guy who is possibly the world’s top globalist is an actual Scots-Irish.

    Where does it say that? He seems to be Irish Catholic. Maybe with a name like Sutherland he has some Anglo-Irish background too. I don’t know. But there is nothing in his biography to suggest any connection to the Scots-Irish/Ulster-Scots or whatever you wish to call them.

    • Replies: @BubbaJoe
    His father was a Scotsman. Not Ulster, not Scots-Irish, not Anglo-Irish. His dad moved to ireland and married a local woman.
  19. The liberal right is always pusing the idea that Canada, Australia and NZ are doing (on average) better than Europe because of open immigration and free markets.

    However, they simply look better because they make more money from post and pre-industrial industries like mining, agriculture, tourism and selling off land to foreigners. Without these flattering economic crutches they would actually be worse off than most European countries. And in any case, Norway and Iceland, which don’t share their resource wealth with foreigners, are significantly richer than immigrant-loving Australia and Canada.

    In terms of productivity, Germany, France and the US – which still have some large high tech industries, are signficantly ahead of the UK Commonwealth.

  20. @Rifleman

    Who is Peter Sutherland?
     
    The most phenotypically Jewish/Semitic Irishman in history..

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!

    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate.

    Based on looks alone there seems almost no way this guy isn't of Jewish ancestry and only "Celtic". And the money and globalization issues....come on.

    Who knows.

    Well, he looks Jewish…but who knows?

    Steve does like to troll his commenters from time to time.

  21. @Pat Casey
    I remember reading how Bernadette Devlin pissed off IRA supporters in South Boston in the 70s when she came over and said she was more comfortable with the blacks in Roxbury than her Irish cousins in Southie. When your enemy is the racial supremacist Orangeman, I guess its natural to adopt an anti-ethno-nationalist ideology, so there is unfortunately an historical logic to Mr. Sutherland's brand of multi-cultural stupidity among the politically conscious Irish. However, the pub people are a different story altogether, and the Irish well know that history is a nightmare from which we seek to awake; as Deasy in Nestor says , Ireland hasn't persecuted the Jews because it never let them in. Swamp that island with brown and black Muslims and watch the brawlers come out. Set off a bomb, and I bet those mosques will remember real quick who taught em how to do it.

    as Deasy in Nestor says , Ireland hasn’t persecuted the Jews because it never let them in.

    Look into what Alan Shatter got up to over the last few years.

    Swamp that island with brown and black Muslims and watch the brawlers come out.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balbriggan#Demographics

    • Replies: @Pat Casey
    Oh my God. Somebody page Kevin MacDonald. This guy is a one-man Jewish conspiracy. Thanks for the heads up.

    Also, so apparently "black Irish" now refers to a black guy from Ireland. Which I, as a Casey, find too hysterical to begrudge.
  22. Three years ago, on the night of Obama’s re-election, when female candidates were triumphant in all races, that was defiant, and it went viral. I wrote how men were on their own, that none should expect any support from the culture, from the courts, from the political process. But I’d goddamned if I would be anybody’s slave. I was new to this community.

    And since that night, it has grown by leaps and bounds. Great men, great writers, great thinkers have emerged to educate us in manners I never thought possible. Communities have formed of like thinkers. And it is all so post-modern, in the way no one, certainly not me, could have ever dreamed.

    Elites are crumbling. Collectively, now, we are the intellectual elite. We are on the cusp of driving the prior establishment of the conservative powers out and replacing them with our own idea, our own thought. Our candidate at this time is driving the election as no other has driven it in many years. Our views are driving the conservative discussion. And come July, we shall move against the right. And day by day, men gain voice, gain courage from the others. If I waiver in the correctness of my views, of my ideas, I am comforted by the fact that my prime source of education is this site, iSteve. If we stand for nothing, we certainly stand for truth and honesty.

    Our cause is right and it is just. And our day is coming. The fight is being taken to the world.

    • Replies: @Massimo Heitor

    Our cause is right and it is just. And our day is coming. The fight is being taken to the world.
     
    Thank you for having saying something positive and beautiful. I am so tired of hearing non stop bad news.
  23. One takeaway from the improbable Shakespeare is that the writing in trashy british tabloids is better than that of the New York Times

  24. el topo [AKA "darryl revok"] says:
    @IHTG
    So the guy who is possibly the world's top globalist is an actual Scots-Irish. This is hilarious.

    (The last time you posted about him there were lots of people in the comments who just couldn't believe he wasn't Jewish, but this time the evidence seems overwhelming)

    He looks very Jewish. Hard to believe he doesn’t have at least significant Jewish ancestry.

  25. @gruff

    as Deasy in Nestor says , Ireland hasn’t persecuted the Jews because it never let them in.
     
    Look into what Alan Shatter got up to over the last few years.

    Swamp that island with brown and black Muslims and watch the brawlers come out.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balbriggan#Demographics

    Oh my God. Somebody page Kevin MacDonald. This guy is a one-man Jewish conspiracy. Thanks for the heads up.

    Also, so apparently “black Irish” now refers to a black guy from Ireland. Which I, as a Casey, find too hysterical to begrudge.

  26. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I apologize for bringing it up but it is simply too strange not to notice.

    The guy looks stereotypically Jewish. His entire professional history and networks of connections are stereotypically Jewish-like. He is an ardent agitator for erasing white identity in Europe. He is an honorary patron of Irish Jewish Museum (http://jewishmuseum.ie/patrons/) and Jewish Business News reprints his article (http://jewishbusinessnews.com/2015/03/02/peter-sutherland-the-migration-opportunity/)

    And yet he is said to be of a mixed Irish-Scottish ancestry. It’s possible of course – just not terribly likely. I’d be more convinced if something concrete was known about his ancestry but in that respect this globalist is strangely anonymous.

    The biography on his own web site only states “Of Irish nationality he was born on 25 April 1946″ – and that’s it (http://petersutherland.co.uk/biography/) Well, no one doubts that he was born in Ireland…

  27. Sutherland is acting out of a deep inferiority complex as an Irishman. His animus towards the once powerful English is simply being extended towards all other EU nations larger than Ireland especially the homogenous ones. It can’t be understated just how bitter & resentful some Irish are at having been such a poor backwater nation for most of the 20th century. Some joined the IRA; others like Sutherland can act out their psychosis by unleashing a battering ram of demographic upheaval against traditional nation states wherever they find them.

  28. @Rifleman

    Who is Peter Sutherland?
     
    The most phenotypically Jewish/Semitic Irishman in history..

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!

    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate.

    Based on looks alone there seems almost no way this guy isn't of Jewish ancestry and only "Celtic". And the money and globalization issues....come on.

    Who knows.

    Did you even READ what Steve posted? He’s CATHOLIC and part of lay organiztions. Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He’s the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian. But go ahead blame Jews. Like Satan in the 14th Century its a universal, non falsifiable religious/magical/vodoo belief.

    You could well argue that the Catholic church is on the whole even worse for the West than Marxism.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Who founded the Catholic Church?

    What ethnicity was Jesus?
    , @Joe Walker
    The reason why the Pope is so pro-immigration is that he grew up in Latin America which is awash with Marxist nonsense. You probably believe that Karl Marx was a Catholic.
    , @iSteveFan

    Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He’s the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian.
     
    You would make a better argument if you actually argued in good faith. Many argue that Jews are entirely to blame for the open border madness. But clearly there are plenty of Gentiles that support this position too. But instead of trying to point this out you make the extremely ridiculous claim that open borders is entirely the fault of Catholics and other Christians.

    Your argument is just as bad as those you try to counter.
    , @namae nanka
    A scots-irish defending a scots-irish, now I've seen everything!
  29. @Perspective
    "Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies."

    So should Italy as well then. Most Japanese seem to logically believe that past guilt should not be transferred to future generations. They often see themselves as victims in WWII, which many were of course.

    So should Italy as well then. Most Japanese seem to logically believe that past guilt should not be transferred to future generations. They often see themselves as victims in WWII, which many were of course.

    Every major involved party had plenty of victims in WWII, Germans, British, US, they all had loses.

    AFAIK, the Italian populace broadly supported the Allies in WWII. There was a large Italian resistance movement that captured and executed Mussolini. Italian Americans were eager to fight for the US, and their loyalty wasn’t questioned unlike German or Japanese Americans.

    It’s interesting that

    In Mussolini’s thinking, demography was destiny; nations with rising populations were nations destined to conquer, and nations with falling populations were decaying powers that deserved to die.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Sicilian-Americans played key roles in 1943 in restoring to power in Sicily the indigenous leadership caste that had been so cruelly persecuted by Mussolini.
    , @J1234

    Italian Americans were eager to fight for the US, and their loyalty wasn’t questioned unlike German or Japanese Americans.
     
    The US did, however, imprison many (thousands, I think) innocent Italians during the war. Many were merchant mariners who just so happened to be temporarily docked in the US when Pearl Harbor happened. (On the other hand, maybe the US did those guys a favor by keeping them out of the conflict.)
  30. anon • Disclaimer says:

    however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states

    When they can see with their own eyes it’s not true.

    An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.

    And yet if that was the key reason then why not promote pro-natal policies?

    Obviously because the key reason is really ethnic replacement.

    (Also always Goldman Sachs.)

    • Agree: ben tillman
  31. @Massimo Heitor

    So should Italy as well then. Most Japanese seem to logically believe that past guilt should not be transferred to future generations. They often see themselves as victims in WWII, which many were of course.
     
    Every major involved party had plenty of victims in WWII, Germans, British, US, they all had loses.

    AFAIK, the Italian populace broadly supported the Allies in WWII. There was a large Italian resistance movement that captured and executed Mussolini. Italian Americans were eager to fight for the US, and their loyalty wasn't questioned unlike German or Japanese Americans.

    It's interesting that

    In Mussolini's thinking, demography was destiny; nations with rising populations were nations destined to conquer, and nations with falling populations were decaying powers that deserved to die.
     

    Sicilian-Americans played key roles in 1943 in restoring to power in Sicily the indigenous leadership caste that had been so cruelly persecuted by Mussolini.

  32. That Shakespeare is some writer!

  33. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Rifleman

    Who is Peter Sutherland?
     
    The most phenotypically Jewish/Semitic Irishman in history..

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!

    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate.

    Based on looks alone there seems almost no way this guy isn't of Jewish ancestry and only "Celtic". And the money and globalization issues....come on.

    Who knows.

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!

    Cultural Marxism is a thing. If you don’t know about it then you’re ignorant.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci

    The theory is quite simple: Gramsci said religion and patriotism prevented people adopting communism so cultural Marxists needed to stop open Communist political activity and infiltrate national institutions like the schools and media and once inside work to destroy religion and patriotism.

    That is how the culture war started.

    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate

    The globalist version of capitalism that has taken over the West since the 8os is in alliance with the cultural Marxist types and funds them because it helps them with importing cheap labor

    That’s the key point about the current political situation; it’s left *and* right against the middle because they both want nation states destroyed.

    • Replies: @ben tillman

    That’s the key point about the current political situation; it’s left *and* right against the middle because they both want nation states destroyed.
     
    Capitalism is and always has been a phenomenon of the Left.
  34. Peter Sutherland looks a lot like the Pope, only not quite as Irish.

  35. Peter Sutherland looks a lot like George Soros, only not quite as Irish.

  36. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    According to this comment at the Irish Savant blog, Sutherland’s ancestry is Irish on the meternal side with a paternal grandfather who came from Scotland. That fits as there is an ancient Scottish earldom of Sutherland. Peter Sutherland looks like an Irish Catholic landlord I once had. He has light eyes, not unheard of among Jews but much more common among Irish and Scots.

  37. @Matra
    So the guy who is possibly the world’s top globalist is an actual Scots-Irish.

    Where does it say that? He seems to be Irish Catholic. Maybe with a name like Sutherland he has some Anglo-Irish background too. I don't know. But there is nothing in his biography to suggest any connection to the Scots-Irish/Ulster-Scots or whatever you wish to call them.

    His father was a Scotsman. Not Ulster, not Scots-Irish, not Anglo-Irish. His dad moved to ireland and married a local woman.

  38. The prime thing about Sutherland is his Catholicism. That’s his effective nationality. At some point the Catholic right in the west turned against nationalism(in Ireland this includes republicanism in the north) among whites, immigration is part of it, so is the EU, which was basically created by establishment Catholics. I wonder when are nationalist finally going to drop Catholicism too.

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class. Why this is is not hard to find out. Jews were a key component of the ruling class in Eastern Europe in the middle ages have have the same attitudes towards the lower orders that the gentiles did.

    Foolish nationalists who think we can cure all our problems with lots more conservatism, capitalism and Christianity are like an idiot who think he can bring about darkness and cold with fire. Its purpose is the opposite.

    • Replies: @iSteveFan

    Foolish nationalists who think we can cure all our problems with lots more conservatism, capitalism and Christianity are like an idiot who think he can bring about darkness and cold with fire. Its purpose is the opposite.
     
    In what country is that true? The nationalists in America would list ending immigration and beginning some sort of repatriation of the existing lot as their top priority. As for capitalism, most would be considered heretics because they would end free trade and go back to using tariffs to protect domestic industries. As for religion most nationalist types I'm aware of are cultural Christians and are not bible thumpers.
    , @backup
    @Irishman()

    The prime thing about Sutherland is his Catholicism. That’s his effective nationality. At some point the Catholic right in the west turned against nationalism(in Ireland this includes republicanism in the north) among whites, immigration is part of it, so is the EU, which was basically created by establishment Catholics. I wonder when are nationalist finally going to drop Catholicism too.
     
    The thing is that Europe is losing faith very rapidly. I think some may consider the colossal influx of Africans a rescue operation for Christianity.
    , @ben tillman

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class.
     
    Whether you prefer theory or empirical data, there is absolutely no doubt that it is the other way around. The gentile portion of the ruling class have assimilated to Jewish norms.
    , @ben tillman

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class.
     
    Whether you prefer theory or empirical data, there is absolutely no doubt that it is the other way around. The gentile portion of the ruling class have assimilated to Jewish norms.
  39. Here we go again…

    • Replies: @Stubborn in Germany
    Yes, the cognitive dissonance among the iSteve regulars is a sight to behold.

    He must be Jewish!

    But he's gotta be Jewish!

    Don't tell me he's not a Jew!

    The curtain's been pulled back and the man turns out to be ... a Catholic Irishman. Oh, but maybe Merkel is secretly Jewish? Didn't she visit Yad Vashem, aren't there pictures of her with Jewish leaders. How about the Pope? His nose sure is awfully big.

    Too funny. But not surprising, either. This is the web page of a guy who (sincerely or not, it's difficult to tell) espouses the "theories" of Kevin McDonald, according to which the devious Jews by "group evolutionary strategies" are always plotting to adulterate the good white stock of their societies with swarthy foreigners so they will feel themselves to be less of a minority.

    And now this. Cognitive dissonance. It's a bitch!
  40. @pyrrhus
    I wonder if Europe will really go quietly into the great darkness of 3d world existence, rather than making corrupt traitors like Sutherland and Merkel into examples, "pour encourager les autres." I would say it's 50-50 at this point in time.

    What reason is there to believe there would be a “great darkness?”. Wouldn’t things just decline somewhat significantly – scientific patents per capita and income go down a bit, homicide rate goes up a bit, things like that?

  41. @IHTG
    Here we go again...

    Yes, the cognitive dissonance among the iSteve regulars is a sight to behold.

    He must be Jewish!

    But he’s gotta be Jewish!

    Don’t tell me he’s not a Jew!

    The curtain’s been pulled back and the man turns out to be … a Catholic Irishman. Oh, but maybe Merkel is secretly Jewish? Didn’t she visit Yad Vashem, aren’t there pictures of her with Jewish leaders. How about the Pope? His nose sure is awfully big.

    Too funny. But not surprising, either. This is the web page of a guy who (sincerely or not, it’s difficult to tell) espouses the “theories” of Kevin McDonald, according to which the devious Jews by “group evolutionary strategies” are always plotting to adulterate the good white stock of their societies with swarthy foreigners so they will feel themselves to be less of a minority.

    And now this. Cognitive dissonance. It’s a bitch!

    • Replies: @anon
    Regardless of his ancestry Sutherland is a perfect example of how what is happening in Europe is a conspiracy to destroy national and ethnic groups in whole or in part.
    , @Deduction
    It has an exact parallel among the Arabs. There isn't a Middle Eastern leader or person of influence whom their enemies do not accuse of being a secret Jew.

    It's kind of funny because I get the impression that Jews do the same thing, but with more of an emphasis on the positive, of course.

    In the latter case it is much more understandable and much less indicative of mental illness.

    I feel like if I could explain this issue, I would have great insight into many contemporary phenomena, but I really can't.

    Maybe because Jews can look like anything it is the easisest way to out someone from the group and reduce one's own shame from your fellow group member's behaviour. This would also then allow you to demonise them to the nth degree without incurring even more shame.

    Maybe this is why this type of thought predominates in areas of political thought where concepts like honour and shame predominate?
    , @el topo
    It's not cognitive dissonance, it's simply objective observation of his appearance coupled with the knowledge that crypsis is a strategy employed by many Jews (especially in Europe, where it has historically been more important to them).

    Sutherland doesn't "have to be a Jew" - in fact, I'm rather glad if he is not, being Jewish myself - but the suspicion arises naturally to those familiar with Jewish appearance and behavior patterns.
    , @Cwhatfuture
    It is pretty amusing. "He looks Jewish, he must have one drop in him somewhere and that one drop would explain everything". But most leprechauns look Jewish to me, what with that beard, funny hat, and pot of gold.

    And it is the pot of gold that is the problem. Low marginal tax rates and the ability to accumulate so much money are what gives repulsive Anglo Irish Catholic leprechauns like this influence. Without the pot of gold, he would be a crank. Is it any wonder that when the U.S. had a more inefficient, but higher marginal tax rate, and higher inheritance taxes, the people were not quite so ignored?
    , @WhatEvvs
    LOL.

    The galling thing is that this blog is one of the few places to get an alternative realistic view of the migration crisis, in the US. It is simply impossible to read anything sensible in the major media.

    There used to be a guy named Bob Grant, who ran a call-in show in the NYC area. He was essentially a racist clown but he performed the same function that this blog does. He said that an alternative name for his show (the official name was The Bob Grant Show) would be: "Misery loves company."

    And so it is here.
  42. this is at the bottom of the google landing page today:
    The UN’s Global Goals to end poverty, climate change, and injustice. Learn more

    I used to think big corporations just paid out money to left wing causes – i still think that’s the case with jesse jackson type shakedowns- but ‘climate change’ is also potentially hugely profitable for companies and give them as much de facto control as being a nation’s bank (see greece’s lenders saying cut this program, increase this tax , sell this asset (cheap to us)

  43. Peter Sutherland career is good example of the kinds of self interest that often lies behind ostensible humanitarianism and rationality economic about migration. These officials are well compensated with directorships., he is hardly a mastermind who originated those ideas though.

    I think most people who have studied Kevin MacDonald’s work think there is something in his ideas, difficult as that may be for a typical German to accept. Certainly no theory can explain the world completely, because there is always more going on that we can understand. MacDonald has written quite a bit about an indigenous culture of critique originating in puritans.

  44. @Massimo Heitor
    Can't one of you smart people fix this insanity? I'm just a lone man. At least brainstorm some ideas?

    Well, there’s the International Nascent European People’s Territorial (INEPT) Army:

    On the frontline are the Southern American Baptists, burning books to intimidate the enemy;
    Behind them is a row of Sumo Dartsvolk, only the lager’s run out so they can’t hit sh*t;
    Some Irish spies are behind enemy lines, switching sides as soon as they’re spotted;
    The Austro-Prussian Dressage team are befuddling the enemy by side-stepping their horses;
    On the flanks are centuries of burly Slavs marching determinedly forward behind their shields to form the ‘horns of the buffalo’, except there’s only one flank and it’s just been surrounded by even burlier young male ‘refugees’;
    The Norse-men went berzerk long ago and are nowhere to be seen;
    The French are still in their tents discussing ‘Qui? Quim?’;
    The Italians are catering corps, whipping up steamy capuccinos for the Commissioned Officers –
    Who are of course, Anglo-this and Anglo-that, each issued with the most powerful binoculars money can buy;

    In the centre stands the general, and a Fraulein by design, she has squandered our resistence for a pocketful of dumplings such as policies;
    All lies and jest, still, a man reads the Unz-Review and disregards the rest;
    Lie La Lie

    • Replies: @helena
    The French are still in their tents discussing ‘Qui? Quim?’. "Non, il n'est pas un matelot; il est un matelet, tu sais." "Mais qu'est-ce que c'est un matelet?". "J'sais pas, moi. Mais, ou est M'bala M'bala? Est-ce qu'il a presente ses excuses pour le terrorisme?" "Tu es fous, bien sure qu'il a presente ses excuses pour le terrorisme! Mais, il a refuse a presente ses excuses pour presente ses excuses." "Voila, c'est ca." "Oui, d'accord. Autre verre du vin?". "Pourquoi pas";
  45. @Pat Casey
    I remember reading how Bernadette Devlin pissed off IRA supporters in South Boston in the 70s when she came over and said she was more comfortable with the blacks in Roxbury than her Irish cousins in Southie. When your enemy is the racial supremacist Orangeman, I guess its natural to adopt an anti-ethno-nationalist ideology, so there is unfortunately an historical logic to Mr. Sutherland's brand of multi-cultural stupidity among the politically conscious Irish. However, the pub people are a different story altogether, and the Irish well know that history is a nightmare from which we seek to awake; as Deasy in Nestor says , Ireland hasn't persecuted the Jews because it never let them in. Swamp that island with brown and black Muslims and watch the brawlers come out. Set off a bomb, and I bet those mosques will remember real quick who taught em how to do it.

    From The Commitments:

    Jimmy Rabbitte: Do you not get it, lads?
    The Irish are the blacks of Europe.
    And Dubliners are the blacks of Ireland.
    And the Northside Dubliners are the blacks of Dublin.
    So say it once, say it loud: I’m black and I’m proud.

  46. @helena
    Well, there's the International Nascent European People's Territorial (INEPT) Army:

    On the frontline are the Southern American Baptists, burning books to intimidate the enemy;
    Behind them is a row of Sumo Dartsvolk, only the lager's run out so they can't hit sh*t;
    Some Irish spies are behind enemy lines, switching sides as soon as they're spotted;
    The Austro-Prussian Dressage team are befuddling the enemy by side-stepping their horses;
    On the flanks are centuries of burly Slavs marching determinedly forward behind their shields to form the 'horns of the buffalo', except there's only one flank and it's just been surrounded by even burlier young male 'refugees';
    The Norse-men went berzerk long ago and are nowhere to be seen;
    The French are still in their tents discussing 'Qui? Quim?';
    The Italians are catering corps, whipping up steamy capuccinos for the Commissioned Officers -
    Who are of course, Anglo-this and Anglo-that, each issued with the most powerful binoculars money can buy;

    In the centre stands the general, and a Fraulein by design, she has squandered our resistence for a pocketful of dumplings such as policies;
    All lies and jest, still, a man reads the Unz-Review and disregards the rest;
    Lie La Lie

    The French are still in their tents discussing ‘Qui? Quim?’. “Non, il n’est pas un matelot; il est un matelet, tu sais.” “Mais qu’est-ce que c’est un matelet?”. “J’sais pas, moi. Mais, ou est M’bala M’bala? Est-ce qu’il a presente ses excuses pour le terrorisme?” “Tu es fous, bien sure qu’il a presente ses excuses pour le terrorisme! Mais, il a refuse a presente ses excuses pour presente ses excuses.” “Voila, c’est ca.” “Oui, d’accord. Autre verre du vin?”. “Pourquoi pas”;

  47. “It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”

    Well, that’s airtight!! You gotta love the lapidary irrefutability of a perfect circle.

  48. @Stubborn in Germany
    Yes, the cognitive dissonance among the iSteve regulars is a sight to behold.

    He must be Jewish!

    But he's gotta be Jewish!

    Don't tell me he's not a Jew!

    The curtain's been pulled back and the man turns out to be ... a Catholic Irishman. Oh, but maybe Merkel is secretly Jewish? Didn't she visit Yad Vashem, aren't there pictures of her with Jewish leaders. How about the Pope? His nose sure is awfully big.

    Too funny. But not surprising, either. This is the web page of a guy who (sincerely or not, it's difficult to tell) espouses the "theories" of Kevin McDonald, according to which the devious Jews by "group evolutionary strategies" are always plotting to adulterate the good white stock of their societies with swarthy foreigners so they will feel themselves to be less of a minority.

    And now this. Cognitive dissonance. It's a bitch!

    Regardless of his ancestry Sutherland is a perfect example of how what is happening in Europe is a conspiracy to destroy national and ethnic groups in whole or in part.

  49. @Mark Minter
    Three years ago, on the night of Obama's re-election, when female candidates were triumphant in all races, that was defiant, and it went viral. I wrote how men were on their own, that none should expect any support from the culture, from the courts, from the political process. But I'd goddamned if I would be anybody's slave. I was new to this community.

    And since that night, it has grown by leaps and bounds. Great men, great writers, great thinkers have emerged to educate us in manners I never thought possible. Communities have formed of like thinkers. And it is all so post-modern, in the way no one, certainly not me, could have ever dreamed.

    Elites are crumbling. Collectively, now, we are the intellectual elite. We are on the cusp of driving the prior establishment of the conservative powers out and replacing them with our own idea, our own thought. Our candidate at this time is driving the election as no other has driven it in many years. Our views are driving the conservative discussion. And come July, we shall move against the right. And day by day, men gain voice, gain courage from the others. If I waiver in the correctness of my views, of my ideas, I am comforted by the fact that my prime source of education is this site, iSteve. If we stand for nothing, we certainly stand for truth and honesty.

    Our cause is right and it is just. And our day is coming. The fight is being taken to the world.

    http://www.diarioaragones.com/files.php?file=Noticias/fotos_noticias/800_cabo_d__an____o_d__as_nabas_de_tolosa_articlo_745783776.jpg

    Our cause is right and it is just. And our day is coming. The fight is being taken to the world.

    Thank you for having saying something positive and beautiful. I am so tired of hearing non stop bad news.

  50. @Massimo Heitor

    Just like Trump recently told border fence naysayers to go ask Israel if fences work, our side in the open borders debate should start promoting Japan whose aging demographics and low birth rates mirror ours.
     
    I love Japan and Israel, I don't think they should be forced to commit demographic suicide, but I do think the political engine driving mass immigration is geared explicitly towards whites and turning the same logic on a non-white nation like Japan would break that dominant political mindset.

    Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies.

    Japanese skin tone is, on average, no darker than Europeans, so it’s pretty absurd to call them “non-white.” One who values accuracy should say “non-European” instead.

    • Replies: @5371
    It's darker.
  51. @Whiskey
    Did you even READ what Steve posted? He's CATHOLIC and part of lay organiztions. Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He's the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian. But go ahead blame Jews. Like Satan in the 14th Century its a universal, non falsifiable religious/magical/vodoo belief.

    You could well argue that the Catholic church is on the whole even worse for the West than Marxism.

    Who founded the Catholic Church?

    What ethnicity was Jesus?

  52. @Whiskey
    Did you even READ what Steve posted? He's CATHOLIC and part of lay organiztions. Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He's the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian. But go ahead blame Jews. Like Satan in the 14th Century its a universal, non falsifiable religious/magical/vodoo belief.

    You could well argue that the Catholic church is on the whole even worse for the West than Marxism.

    The reason why the Pope is so pro-immigration is that he grew up in Latin America which is awash with Marxist nonsense. You probably believe that Karl Marx was a Catholic.

  53. @Stubborn in Germany
    Yes, the cognitive dissonance among the iSteve regulars is a sight to behold.

    He must be Jewish!

    But he's gotta be Jewish!

    Don't tell me he's not a Jew!

    The curtain's been pulled back and the man turns out to be ... a Catholic Irishman. Oh, but maybe Merkel is secretly Jewish? Didn't she visit Yad Vashem, aren't there pictures of her with Jewish leaders. How about the Pope? His nose sure is awfully big.

    Too funny. But not surprising, either. This is the web page of a guy who (sincerely or not, it's difficult to tell) espouses the "theories" of Kevin McDonald, according to which the devious Jews by "group evolutionary strategies" are always plotting to adulterate the good white stock of their societies with swarthy foreigners so they will feel themselves to be less of a minority.

    And now this. Cognitive dissonance. It's a bitch!

    It has an exact parallel among the Arabs. There isn’t a Middle Eastern leader or person of influence whom their enemies do not accuse of being a secret Jew.

    It’s kind of funny because I get the impression that Jews do the same thing, but with more of an emphasis on the positive, of course.

    In the latter case it is much more understandable and much less indicative of mental illness.

    I feel like if I could explain this issue, I would have great insight into many contemporary phenomena, but I really can’t.

    Maybe because Jews can look like anything it is the easisest way to out someone from the group and reduce one’s own shame from your fellow group member’s behaviour. This would also then allow you to demonise them to the nth degree without incurring even more shame.

    Maybe this is why this type of thought predominates in areas of political thought where concepts like honour and shame predominate?

    • Replies: @ben tillman

    It has an exact parallel among the Arabs. There isn’t a Middle Eastern leader or person of influence whom their enemies do not accuse of being a secret Jew.
     
    It's not as if they're never right. Wasn't Qaddafi's mother Jewish?
  54. Steve your whims have no rhyme or reason.

    You allow a comment like

    I wonder if Europe will really go quietly into the great darkness of 3d world existence, rather than making corrupt traitors like Sutherland and Merkel into examples, “pour encourager les autres.” I would say it’s 50-50 at this point in time

    But censor

    It’s unlikely that all his money will be able to protect him from the fate he deserves after SHTF.

    It’s not as if pyrrhus doesn’t use very harsh language to describe Sutherland.

    I don’t understand why a blogger who is more insightful and honest than almost any other writer out there has such a petulant and arbitrary comment policy. I’m sure you are capable of coming up with some clear standards in plain English.

  55. @Massimo Heitor

    So should Italy as well then. Most Japanese seem to logically believe that past guilt should not be transferred to future generations. They often see themselves as victims in WWII, which many were of course.
     
    Every major involved party had plenty of victims in WWII, Germans, British, US, they all had loses.

    AFAIK, the Italian populace broadly supported the Allies in WWII. There was a large Italian resistance movement that captured and executed Mussolini. Italian Americans were eager to fight for the US, and their loyalty wasn't questioned unlike German or Japanese Americans.

    It's interesting that

    In Mussolini's thinking, demography was destiny; nations with rising populations were nations destined to conquer, and nations with falling populations were decaying powers that deserved to die.
     

    Italian Americans were eager to fight for the US, and their loyalty wasn’t questioned unlike German or Japanese Americans.

    The US did, however, imprison many (thousands, I think) innocent Italians during the war. Many were merchant mariners who just so happened to be temporarily docked in the US when Pearl Harbor happened. (On the other hand, maybe the US did those guys a favor by keeping them out of the conflict.)

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Joe Dimaggio's dad, a San Francisco fisherman, was grounded for the duration to prevent him from, uh, teaming up with the Axis invasion fleet off the Golden Gate, or something. His son Dom made a point of this about 15 years ago: it wasn't just the Japanese.
  56. @Massimo Heitor

    Just like Trump recently told border fence naysayers to go ask Israel if fences work, our side in the open borders debate should start promoting Japan whose aging demographics and low birth rates mirror ours.
     
    I love Japan and Israel, I don't think they should be forced to commit demographic suicide, but I do think the political engine driving mass immigration is geared explicitly towards whites and turning the same logic on a non-white nation like Japan would break that dominant political mindset.

    Japan should share WWII guilt as well. They were literally the Nazis greatest allies.

    He is saying that Japan is in pretty good shape for a nation totally doomed by demographics.

  57. @AndrewR
    Japanese skin tone is, on average, no darker than Europeans, so it's pretty absurd to call them "non-white." One who values accuracy should say "non-European" instead.

    It’s darker.

  58. @Irishman()
    The prime thing about Sutherland is his Catholicism. That's his effective nationality. At some point the Catholic right in the west turned against nationalism(in Ireland this includes republicanism in the north) among whites, immigration is part of it, so is the EU, which was basically created by establishment Catholics. I wonder when are nationalist finally going to drop Catholicism too.

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class. Why this is is not hard to find out. Jews were a key component of the ruling class in Eastern Europe in the middle ages have have the same attitudes towards the lower orders that the gentiles did.

    Foolish nationalists who think we can cure all our problems with lots more conservatism, capitalism and Christianity are like an idiot who think he can bring about darkness and cold with fire. Its purpose is the opposite.

    Foolish nationalists who think we can cure all our problems with lots more conservatism, capitalism and Christianity are like an idiot who think he can bring about darkness and cold with fire. Its purpose is the opposite.

    In what country is that true? The nationalists in America would list ending immigration and beginning some sort of repatriation of the existing lot as their top priority. As for capitalism, most would be considered heretics because they would end free trade and go back to using tariffs to protect domestic industries. As for religion most nationalist types I’m aware of are cultural Christians and are not bible thumpers.

    • Replies: @Irishman()

    In what country is that true? The nationalists in America would list ending immigration and beginning some sort of repatriation of the existing lot as their top priority. As for capitalism, most would be considered heretics because they would end free trade and go back to using tariffs to protect domestic industries. As for religion most nationalist types I’m aware of are cultural Christians and are not bible thumpers.
     
    And the very reason none of that will ever happen is that business will use its power to stop it. Trade agreements and immigration are a consequence of corporate power. Unless corporate power is broken, anything that is substantially contrary to corporate interests won't happen.

    National capitalism is a mirage. America had tariffs because business wanted them. They subsidise investment, and until the 20th century were against the economic interests of most Americans by raising the cost of living at a time when most people lived off the land. If anything Corporate power is stronger under protectionism. Sectors of the protected part of the economy tend to become cartelised or monopolistic as happened in the nineteenth century. People like Rockefeller and carnegie would never have been able to get as rich and powerful under free trade. Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.

    My point about the three C's is that they are things that must be defeated, illnesses to be cured if you will. The only type of nationalism that could ever succeed is one where power; economic, social and political, is wielded by the people. Political power is zero sum. Conservatism is modern iteration of feudalism, the few hoarding power at the expense of the many. Capitalism always leads to oligarchy because that's the way to maximise profit. But they don't tell you that when they're trying to sell it to you. Christianity is a psychological structure to justify servitude. No white nation ever converted to Christianity voluntarily. In every instance from the Roman empire, to Ireland, to the Germanic states to Russia(look that one up, particularly cynical) it was imposed by a king who had been converted by a small minority of his population who were frequently foreigners. The religions the stamped out lived on nonetheless for centuries, as late as the 17th century in Lithuania. The biggest consequence of the Christianisation of Europe was the development of feudalism and growth of royal power. It wasn't until Christian power was broken by the wars of religion that democracy could develop. The demise of Christian power was like a slab of rock being lifted off grass. Time to go the whole way and ditch such nonsense altogether.
  59. @anon

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!
     
    Cultural Marxism is a thing. If you don't know about it then you're ignorant.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci

    The theory is quite simple: Gramsci said religion and patriotism prevented people adopting communism so cultural Marxists needed to stop open Communist political activity and infiltrate national institutions like the schools and media and once inside work to destroy religion and patriotism.

    That is how the culture war started.


    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate
     
    The globalist version of capitalism that has taken over the West since the 8os is in alliance with the cultural Marxist types and funds them because it helps them with importing cheap labor

    That's the key point about the current political situation; it's left *and* right against the middle because they both want nation states destroyed.

    That’s the key point about the current political situation; it’s left *and* right against the middle because they both want nation states destroyed.

    Capitalism is and always has been a phenomenon of the Left.

  60. @Whiskey
    Did you even READ what Steve posted? He's CATHOLIC and part of lay organiztions. Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He's the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian. But go ahead blame Jews. Like Satan in the 14th Century its a universal, non falsifiable religious/magical/vodoo belief.

    You could well argue that the Catholic church is on the whole even worse for the West than Marxism.

    Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He’s the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian.

    You would make a better argument if you actually argued in good faith. Many argue that Jews are entirely to blame for the open border madness. But clearly there are plenty of Gentiles that support this position too. But instead of trying to point this out you make the extremely ridiculous claim that open borders is entirely the fault of Catholics and other Christians.

    Your argument is just as bad as those you try to counter.

    • Replies: @anowow
    Whiskey is just letting his "Presbyterian" bias show.
  61. @Pat Casey
    I remember reading how Bernadette Devlin pissed off IRA supporters in South Boston in the 70s when she came over and said she was more comfortable with the blacks in Roxbury than her Irish cousins in Southie. When your enemy is the racial supremacist Orangeman, I guess its natural to adopt an anti-ethno-nationalist ideology, so there is unfortunately an historical logic to Mr. Sutherland's brand of multi-cultural stupidity among the politically conscious Irish. However, the pub people are a different story altogether, and the Irish well know that history is a nightmare from which we seek to awake; as Deasy in Nestor says , Ireland hasn't persecuted the Jews because it never let them in. Swamp that island with brown and black Muslims and watch the brawlers come out. Set off a bomb, and I bet those mosques will remember real quick who taught em how to do it.

    Eh? This must be the first time ever Bernadette Devlin and a classic South Dublin/Law Library product like Peter Sutherland have ever been lumped together.

  62. @athEIst
    Steve, I presume you put that portrait in and its caption...
    just as Holbein includes a distorted skull to remind the viewer that all rational hopes are in vain. ….
    Wow, I've never seen that before. Was it common? Can you amplify?

    This is called an anamorphosis.

    Examples …

  63. @Irishman()
    The prime thing about Sutherland is his Catholicism. That's his effective nationality. At some point the Catholic right in the west turned against nationalism(in Ireland this includes republicanism in the north) among whites, immigration is part of it, so is the EU, which was basically created by establishment Catholics. I wonder when are nationalist finally going to drop Catholicism too.

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class. Why this is is not hard to find out. Jews were a key component of the ruling class in Eastern Europe in the middle ages have have the same attitudes towards the lower orders that the gentiles did.

    Foolish nationalists who think we can cure all our problems with lots more conservatism, capitalism and Christianity are like an idiot who think he can bring about darkness and cold with fire. Its purpose is the opposite.

    The prime thing about Sutherland is his Catholicism. That’s his effective nationality. At some point the Catholic right in the west turned against nationalism(in Ireland this includes republicanism in the north) among whites, immigration is part of it, so is the EU, which was basically created by establishment Catholics. I wonder when are nationalist finally going to drop Catholicism too.

    The thing is that Europe is losing faith very rapidly. I think some may consider the colossal influx of Africans a rescue operation for Christianity.

  64. @iSteveFan

    Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He’s the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian.
     
    You would make a better argument if you actually argued in good faith. Many argue that Jews are entirely to blame for the open border madness. But clearly there are plenty of Gentiles that support this position too. But instead of trying to point this out you make the extremely ridiculous claim that open borders is entirely the fault of Catholics and other Christians.

    Your argument is just as bad as those you try to counter.

    Whiskey is just letting his “Presbyterian” bias show.

  65. Nice to see we can still be against one kind of ‘homo’.

  66. el topo [AKA "darryl revok"] says:
    @Stubborn in Germany
    Yes, the cognitive dissonance among the iSteve regulars is a sight to behold.

    He must be Jewish!

    But he's gotta be Jewish!

    Don't tell me he's not a Jew!

    The curtain's been pulled back and the man turns out to be ... a Catholic Irishman. Oh, but maybe Merkel is secretly Jewish? Didn't she visit Yad Vashem, aren't there pictures of her with Jewish leaders. How about the Pope? His nose sure is awfully big.

    Too funny. But not surprising, either. This is the web page of a guy who (sincerely or not, it's difficult to tell) espouses the "theories" of Kevin McDonald, according to which the devious Jews by "group evolutionary strategies" are always plotting to adulterate the good white stock of their societies with swarthy foreigners so they will feel themselves to be less of a minority.

    And now this. Cognitive dissonance. It's a bitch!

    It’s not cognitive dissonance, it’s simply objective observation of his appearance coupled with the knowledge that crypsis is a strategy employed by many Jews (especially in Europe, where it has historically been more important to them).

    Sutherland doesn’t “have to be a Jew” – in fact, I’m rather glad if he is not, being Jewish myself – but the suspicion arises naturally to those familiar with Jewish appearance and behavior patterns.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Maybe he's not at all Jewish, but everybody else, Jews and gentiles alike, assumes he is, so his career has prospered as everybody in Ireland assumes he is secretly Jewish and therefore smart.

    "We're in big trouble. We need a smart Jewish lawyer."

    "But this Ireland. There are hardly any."

    "What about Peter Sutherland?"

    "Paddy? He's at Mass every Sunday morning."

    "It's obviously just an act."

    "Well, he does look Jewish ..."

    "So there's our secret smart Jewish lawyer!"

    "But he doesn't seem very smart."

    "That's probably just an act, too. A cunning bastard like him is just what we need."

    "Okay, we'll retain him."

  67. On BBC Radio Four yesterday at 7.35 Frans Timmermans, “first vice-president of the European Commission” and EU Comissioner for various things, gave an interview about the crisis, in which he basically said that Eastern Europe had been under the Communist heel for many years in which it didn’t get the benefits of diversity, but that they’d have to get used to it as “all nations will be diverse”. I’ll see if I can do a transcript tomorrow.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frans_Timmermans

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06c06nb

  68. @Stubborn in Germany
    Yes, the cognitive dissonance among the iSteve regulars is a sight to behold.

    He must be Jewish!

    But he's gotta be Jewish!

    Don't tell me he's not a Jew!

    The curtain's been pulled back and the man turns out to be ... a Catholic Irishman. Oh, but maybe Merkel is secretly Jewish? Didn't she visit Yad Vashem, aren't there pictures of her with Jewish leaders. How about the Pope? His nose sure is awfully big.

    Too funny. But not surprising, either. This is the web page of a guy who (sincerely or not, it's difficult to tell) espouses the "theories" of Kevin McDonald, according to which the devious Jews by "group evolutionary strategies" are always plotting to adulterate the good white stock of their societies with swarthy foreigners so they will feel themselves to be less of a minority.

    And now this. Cognitive dissonance. It's a bitch!

    It is pretty amusing. “He looks Jewish, he must have one drop in him somewhere and that one drop would explain everything“. But most leprechauns look Jewish to me, what with that beard, funny hat, and pot of gold.

    And it is the pot of gold that is the problem. Low marginal tax rates and the ability to accumulate so much money are what gives repulsive Anglo Irish Catholic leprechauns like this influence. Without the pot of gold, he would be a crank. Is it any wonder that when the U.S. had a more inefficient, but higher marginal tax rate, and higher inheritance taxes, the people were not quite so ignored?

  69. @iSteveFan

    Foolish nationalists who think we can cure all our problems with lots more conservatism, capitalism and Christianity are like an idiot who think he can bring about darkness and cold with fire. Its purpose is the opposite.
     
    In what country is that true? The nationalists in America would list ending immigration and beginning some sort of repatriation of the existing lot as their top priority. As for capitalism, most would be considered heretics because they would end free trade and go back to using tariffs to protect domestic industries. As for religion most nationalist types I'm aware of are cultural Christians and are not bible thumpers.

    In what country is that true? The nationalists in America would list ending immigration and beginning some sort of repatriation of the existing lot as their top priority. As for capitalism, most would be considered heretics because they would end free trade and go back to using tariffs to protect domestic industries. As for religion most nationalist types I’m aware of are cultural Christians and are not bible thumpers.

    And the very reason none of that will ever happen is that business will use its power to stop it. Trade agreements and immigration are a consequence of corporate power. Unless corporate power is broken, anything that is substantially contrary to corporate interests won’t happen.

    National capitalism is a mirage. America had tariffs because business wanted them. They subsidise investment, and until the 20th century were against the economic interests of most Americans by raising the cost of living at a time when most people lived off the land. If anything Corporate power is stronger under protectionism. Sectors of the protected part of the economy tend to become cartelised or monopolistic as happened in the nineteenth century. People like Rockefeller and carnegie would never have been able to get as rich and powerful under free trade. Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.

    My point about the three C’s is that they are things that must be defeated, illnesses to be cured if you will. The only type of nationalism that could ever succeed is one where power; economic, social and political, is wielded by the people. Political power is zero sum. Conservatism is modern iteration of feudalism, the few hoarding power at the expense of the many. Capitalism always leads to oligarchy because that’s the way to maximise profit. But they don’t tell you that when they’re trying to sell it to you. Christianity is a psychological structure to justify servitude. No white nation ever converted to Christianity voluntarily. In every instance from the Roman empire, to Ireland, to the Germanic states to Russia(look that one up, particularly cynical) it was imposed by a king who had been converted by a small minority of his population who were frequently foreigners. The religions the stamped out lived on nonetheless for centuries, as late as the 17th century in Lithuania. The biggest consequence of the Christianisation of Europe was the development of feudalism and growth of royal power. It wasn’t until Christian power was broken by the wars of religion that democracy could develop. The demise of Christian power was like a slab of rock being lifted off grass. Time to go the whole way and ditch such nonsense altogether.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    "Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is."

    That was true but it's getting less so as the economy gets more globalized. Soderbergh made a movie a half decade ago about the true story of an ambitious hayseed (Matt Damon) at Archer-Daniels-Midland who organized a global cartel. This is becoming more common, but there's not much interest in noticing.

    , @iSteveFan

    America had tariffs because business wanted them.
     
    America had tariffs because Alexander Hamilton and many presidents on down wanted them. I doubt Teddy Roosevelt was a tool of big business given his trust busting activities. Teddy wanted tariffs and did not support free trade. Was he a tool of big business, or did he want to make America an independent, economic power?

    Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.
     
    I don't see how this is so. It used to be that Congress (Sherman Act) would prevent American companies from merging if the new company would control a certain percentage of the market. But with free trade making our companies compete on equal footing with the giant foreign conglomerates, we almost have to let our companies merge, despite their new market share, because if our companies are not large enough, they won't be able to compete in the global market place.

    In other words the US lived with the Sherman Act, but a lot of the world couldn't give 2 cents about it. Now that our market is as equally open to foreign firms as it is to our own, we can either continue to enforce the Sherman Act and watch as our companies get killed in the global market, or emulate our foreign competitors and create huge enterprises.
    , @5371
    [People like Rockefeller and carnegie would never have been able to get as rich and powerful under free trade.]
    "Free trade" for you is like communism for the vulgar Marxist. Can never fail, only be failed.
  70. @el topo
    It's not cognitive dissonance, it's simply objective observation of his appearance coupled with the knowledge that crypsis is a strategy employed by many Jews (especially in Europe, where it has historically been more important to them).

    Sutherland doesn't "have to be a Jew" - in fact, I'm rather glad if he is not, being Jewish myself - but the suspicion arises naturally to those familiar with Jewish appearance and behavior patterns.

    Maybe he’s not at all Jewish, but everybody else, Jews and gentiles alike, assumes he is, so his career has prospered as everybody in Ireland assumes he is secretly Jewish and therefore smart.

    “We’re in big trouble. We need a smart Jewish lawyer.”

    “But this Ireland. There are hardly any.”

    “What about Peter Sutherland?”

    “Paddy? He’s at Mass every Sunday morning.”

    “It’s obviously just an act.”

    “Well, he does look Jewish …”

    “So there’s our secret smart Jewish lawyer!”

    “But he doesn’t seem very smart.”

    “That’s probably just an act, too. A cunning bastard like him is just what we need.”

    “Okay, we’ll retain him.”

    • Replies: @ben tillman

    Maybe he’s not at all Jewish, but everybody else, Jews and gentiles alike, assumes he is, so his career has prospered as everybody in Ireland assumes he is secretly Jewish and therefore smart.
     
    My other grandfather had a German last name and an Old-Testament first name and made a fortune in the garment business. I've often wondered whether anyone made a mistaken assumption about his background.
  71. @Irishman()

    In what country is that true? The nationalists in America would list ending immigration and beginning some sort of repatriation of the existing lot as their top priority. As for capitalism, most would be considered heretics because they would end free trade and go back to using tariffs to protect domestic industries. As for religion most nationalist types I’m aware of are cultural Christians and are not bible thumpers.
     
    And the very reason none of that will ever happen is that business will use its power to stop it. Trade agreements and immigration are a consequence of corporate power. Unless corporate power is broken, anything that is substantially contrary to corporate interests won't happen.

    National capitalism is a mirage. America had tariffs because business wanted them. They subsidise investment, and until the 20th century were against the economic interests of most Americans by raising the cost of living at a time when most people lived off the land. If anything Corporate power is stronger under protectionism. Sectors of the protected part of the economy tend to become cartelised or monopolistic as happened in the nineteenth century. People like Rockefeller and carnegie would never have been able to get as rich and powerful under free trade. Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.

    My point about the three C's is that they are things that must be defeated, illnesses to be cured if you will. The only type of nationalism that could ever succeed is one where power; economic, social and political, is wielded by the people. Political power is zero sum. Conservatism is modern iteration of feudalism, the few hoarding power at the expense of the many. Capitalism always leads to oligarchy because that's the way to maximise profit. But they don't tell you that when they're trying to sell it to you. Christianity is a psychological structure to justify servitude. No white nation ever converted to Christianity voluntarily. In every instance from the Roman empire, to Ireland, to the Germanic states to Russia(look that one up, particularly cynical) it was imposed by a king who had been converted by a small minority of his population who were frequently foreigners. The religions the stamped out lived on nonetheless for centuries, as late as the 17th century in Lithuania. The biggest consequence of the Christianisation of Europe was the development of feudalism and growth of royal power. It wasn't until Christian power was broken by the wars of religion that democracy could develop. The demise of Christian power was like a slab of rock being lifted off grass. Time to go the whole way and ditch such nonsense altogether.

    “Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.”

    That was true but it’s getting less so as the economy gets more globalized. Soderbergh made a movie a half decade ago about the true story of an ambitious hayseed (Matt Damon) at Archer-Daniels-Midland who organized a global cartel. This is becoming more common, but there’s not much interest in noticing.

  72. @J1234

    Italian Americans were eager to fight for the US, and their loyalty wasn’t questioned unlike German or Japanese Americans.
     
    The US did, however, imprison many (thousands, I think) innocent Italians during the war. Many were merchant mariners who just so happened to be temporarily docked in the US when Pearl Harbor happened. (On the other hand, maybe the US did those guys a favor by keeping them out of the conflict.)

    Joe Dimaggio’s dad, a San Francisco fisherman, was grounded for the duration to prevent him from, uh, teaming up with the Axis invasion fleet off the Golden Gate, or something. His son Dom made a point of this about 15 years ago: it wasn’t just the Japanese.

    • Replies: @ben tillman

    Joe Dimaggio’s dad, a San Francisco fisherman, was grounded for the duration to prevent him from, uh, teaming up with the Axis invasion fleet off the Golden Gate, or something. His son Dom made a point of this about 15 years ago: it wasn’t just the Japanese.
     
    It happened to German-Americans too, including one of my grandfathers.
    , @ben tillman

    Joe Dimaggio’s dad, a San Francisco fisherman, was grounded for the duration to prevent him from, uh, teaming up with the Axis invasion fleet off the Golden Gate, or something. His son Dom made a point of this about 15 years ago: it wasn’t just the Japanese.
     
    It happened to German-Americans too, including one of my grandfathers.
  73. @Irishman()

    In what country is that true? The nationalists in America would list ending immigration and beginning some sort of repatriation of the existing lot as their top priority. As for capitalism, most would be considered heretics because they would end free trade and go back to using tariffs to protect domestic industries. As for religion most nationalist types I’m aware of are cultural Christians and are not bible thumpers.
     
    And the very reason none of that will ever happen is that business will use its power to stop it. Trade agreements and immigration are a consequence of corporate power. Unless corporate power is broken, anything that is substantially contrary to corporate interests won't happen.

    National capitalism is a mirage. America had tariffs because business wanted them. They subsidise investment, and until the 20th century were against the economic interests of most Americans by raising the cost of living at a time when most people lived off the land. If anything Corporate power is stronger under protectionism. Sectors of the protected part of the economy tend to become cartelised or monopolistic as happened in the nineteenth century. People like Rockefeller and carnegie would never have been able to get as rich and powerful under free trade. Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.

    My point about the three C's is that they are things that must be defeated, illnesses to be cured if you will. The only type of nationalism that could ever succeed is one where power; economic, social and political, is wielded by the people. Political power is zero sum. Conservatism is modern iteration of feudalism, the few hoarding power at the expense of the many. Capitalism always leads to oligarchy because that's the way to maximise profit. But they don't tell you that when they're trying to sell it to you. Christianity is a psychological structure to justify servitude. No white nation ever converted to Christianity voluntarily. In every instance from the Roman empire, to Ireland, to the Germanic states to Russia(look that one up, particularly cynical) it was imposed by a king who had been converted by a small minority of his population who were frequently foreigners. The religions the stamped out lived on nonetheless for centuries, as late as the 17th century in Lithuania. The biggest consequence of the Christianisation of Europe was the development of feudalism and growth of royal power. It wasn't until Christian power was broken by the wars of religion that democracy could develop. The demise of Christian power was like a slab of rock being lifted off grass. Time to go the whole way and ditch such nonsense altogether.

    America had tariffs because business wanted them.

    America had tariffs because Alexander Hamilton and many presidents on down wanted them. I doubt Teddy Roosevelt was a tool of big business given his trust busting activities. Teddy wanted tariffs and did not support free trade. Was he a tool of big business, or did he want to make America an independent, economic power?

    Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.

    I don’t see how this is so. It used to be that Congress (Sherman Act) would prevent American companies from merging if the new company would control a certain percentage of the market. But with free trade making our companies compete on equal footing with the giant foreign conglomerates, we almost have to let our companies merge, despite their new market share, because if our companies are not large enough, they won’t be able to compete in the global market place.

    In other words the US lived with the Sherman Act, but a lot of the world couldn’t give 2 cents about it. Now that our market is as equally open to foreign firms as it is to our own, we can either continue to enforce the Sherman Act and watch as our companies get killed in the global market, or emulate our foreign competitors and create huge enterprises.

    • Replies: @Irishman()
    Hamilton was a protectionist because he was pro-business. Which is why he was treasury secretary. Open your eyes dear. There was no golden age of political virtue.

    Yep, the Sherman anti-trust act was a defeat for business and but TR's protectionism was an irrelevant anachronism because by the 20th century American industry was for larger and more efficient than the rest of the world and had nothing to fear from foreign competition. All TR achieved with protectionism rather than free trade was to postpone America's global dominance by 40 years and make Americans poorer.

    Anti-trust laws don't count for much anymore. For the same reason Americans get free trade agreements they dislike.
  74. @iSteveFan

    America had tariffs because business wanted them.
     
    America had tariffs because Alexander Hamilton and many presidents on down wanted them. I doubt Teddy Roosevelt was a tool of big business given his trust busting activities. Teddy wanted tariffs and did not support free trade. Was he a tool of big business, or did he want to make America an independent, economic power?

    Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.
     
    I don't see how this is so. It used to be that Congress (Sherman Act) would prevent American companies from merging if the new company would control a certain percentage of the market. But with free trade making our companies compete on equal footing with the giant foreign conglomerates, we almost have to let our companies merge, despite their new market share, because if our companies are not large enough, they won't be able to compete in the global market place.

    In other words the US lived with the Sherman Act, but a lot of the world couldn't give 2 cents about it. Now that our market is as equally open to foreign firms as it is to our own, we can either continue to enforce the Sherman Act and watch as our companies get killed in the global market, or emulate our foreign competitors and create huge enterprises.

    Hamilton was a protectionist because he was pro-business. Which is why he was treasury secretary. Open your eyes dear. There was no golden age of political virtue.

    Yep, the Sherman anti-trust act was a defeat for business and but TR’s protectionism was an irrelevant anachronism because by the 20th century American industry was for larger and more efficient than the rest of the world and had nothing to fear from foreign competition. All TR achieved with protectionism rather than free trade was to postpone America’s global dominance by 40 years and make Americans poorer.

    Anti-trust laws don’t count for much anymore. For the same reason Americans get free trade agreements they dislike.

  75. @Whiskey
    Did you even READ what Steve posted? He's CATHOLIC and part of lay organiztions. Catholucs are far, far, far worse than Jews. Indeed open borders are part if Catholic dogma. Just ask the Pope. He's the authority on such matters. Open borders suicide is entirely Catholic and certainly Chrstian. But go ahead blame Jews. Like Satan in the 14th Century its a universal, non falsifiable religious/magical/vodoo belief.

    You could well argue that the Catholic church is on the whole even worse for the West than Marxism.

    A scots-irish defending a scots-irish, now I’ve seen everything!

  76. @Irishman()

    In what country is that true? The nationalists in America would list ending immigration and beginning some sort of repatriation of the existing lot as their top priority. As for capitalism, most would be considered heretics because they would end free trade and go back to using tariffs to protect domestic industries. As for religion most nationalist types I’m aware of are cultural Christians and are not bible thumpers.
     
    And the very reason none of that will ever happen is that business will use its power to stop it. Trade agreements and immigration are a consequence of corporate power. Unless corporate power is broken, anything that is substantially contrary to corporate interests won't happen.

    National capitalism is a mirage. America had tariffs because business wanted them. They subsidise investment, and until the 20th century were against the economic interests of most Americans by raising the cost of living at a time when most people lived off the land. If anything Corporate power is stronger under protectionism. Sectors of the protected part of the economy tend to become cartelised or monopolistic as happened in the nineteenth century. People like Rockefeller and carnegie would never have been able to get as rich and powerful under free trade. Free trade is the most effective anti-trust program there is.

    My point about the three C's is that they are things that must be defeated, illnesses to be cured if you will. The only type of nationalism that could ever succeed is one where power; economic, social and political, is wielded by the people. Political power is zero sum. Conservatism is modern iteration of feudalism, the few hoarding power at the expense of the many. Capitalism always leads to oligarchy because that's the way to maximise profit. But they don't tell you that when they're trying to sell it to you. Christianity is a psychological structure to justify servitude. No white nation ever converted to Christianity voluntarily. In every instance from the Roman empire, to Ireland, to the Germanic states to Russia(look that one up, particularly cynical) it was imposed by a king who had been converted by a small minority of his population who were frequently foreigners. The religions the stamped out lived on nonetheless for centuries, as late as the 17th century in Lithuania. The biggest consequence of the Christianisation of Europe was the development of feudalism and growth of royal power. It wasn't until Christian power was broken by the wars of religion that democracy could develop. The demise of Christian power was like a slab of rock being lifted off grass. Time to go the whole way and ditch such nonsense altogether.

    [People like Rockefeller and carnegie would never have been able to get as rich and powerful under free trade.]
    “Free trade” for you is like communism for the vulgar Marxist. Can never fail, only be failed.

  77. WhatEvvs [AKA "Elizabeth Mott-Mulberry-Street"] says:
    @Stubborn in Germany
    Yes, the cognitive dissonance among the iSteve regulars is a sight to behold.

    He must be Jewish!

    But he's gotta be Jewish!

    Don't tell me he's not a Jew!

    The curtain's been pulled back and the man turns out to be ... a Catholic Irishman. Oh, but maybe Merkel is secretly Jewish? Didn't she visit Yad Vashem, aren't there pictures of her with Jewish leaders. How about the Pope? His nose sure is awfully big.

    Too funny. But not surprising, either. This is the web page of a guy who (sincerely or not, it's difficult to tell) espouses the "theories" of Kevin McDonald, according to which the devious Jews by "group evolutionary strategies" are always plotting to adulterate the good white stock of their societies with swarthy foreigners so they will feel themselves to be less of a minority.

    And now this. Cognitive dissonance. It's a bitch!

    LOL.

    The galling thing is that this blog is one of the few places to get an alternative realistic view of the migration crisis, in the US. It is simply impossible to read anything sensible in the major media.

    There used to be a guy named Bob Grant, who ran a call-in show in the NYC area. He was essentially a racist clown but he performed the same function that this blog does. He said that an alternative name for his show (the official name was The Bob Grant Show) would be: “Misery loves company.”

    And so it is here.

    • Replies: @Bill B.
    Why, given your observation on the zeitgeist, would anyone be "happy", on the assumption that happiness typically correlates with optimism in the psychologically balanced?

    This place is a commune of daffy optimists compared to some blogs. Check out biasedbbc for an exotic example.
  78. WhatEvvs [AKA "Elizabeth Mott-Mulberry-Street"] says:
    @Rifleman

    Who is Peter Sutherland?
     
    The most phenotypically Jewish/Semitic Irishman in history..

    Also, will all you Cultural Marxism blaming White male paranoids please shuut the F up now!!!

    This is pure Cultural CAPITALISM that wants all the things you fear and hate.

    Based on looks alone there seems almost no way this guy isn't of Jewish ancestry and only "Celtic". And the money and globalization issues....come on.

    Who knows.

    The most phenotypically Jewish/Semitic Irishman in history..

    In other words: “Put me on ignore. My opinions are the worthless rantings of a keyboard jockey loser.”

  79. @Irishman()
    The prime thing about Sutherland is his Catholicism. That's his effective nationality. At some point the Catholic right in the west turned against nationalism(in Ireland this includes republicanism in the north) among whites, immigration is part of it, so is the EU, which was basically created by establishment Catholics. I wonder when are nationalist finally going to drop Catholicism too.

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class. Why this is is not hard to find out. Jews were a key component of the ruling class in Eastern Europe in the middle ages have have the same attitudes towards the lower orders that the gentiles did.

    Foolish nationalists who think we can cure all our problems with lots more conservatism, capitalism and Christianity are like an idiot who think he can bring about darkness and cold with fire. Its purpose is the opposite.

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class.

    Whether you prefer theory or empirical data, there is absolutely no doubt that it is the other way around. The gentile portion of the ruling class have assimilated to Jewish norms.

  80. @Irishman()
    The prime thing about Sutherland is his Catholicism. That's his effective nationality. At some point the Catholic right in the west turned against nationalism(in Ireland this includes republicanism in the north) among whites, immigration is part of it, so is the EU, which was basically created by establishment Catholics. I wonder when are nationalist finally going to drop Catholicism too.

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class. Why this is is not hard to find out. Jews were a key component of the ruling class in Eastern Europe in the middle ages have have the same attitudes towards the lower orders that the gentiles did.

    Foolish nationalists who think we can cure all our problems with lots more conservatism, capitalism and Christianity are like an idiot who think he can bring about darkness and cold with fire. Its purpose is the opposite.

    I have always found the likes of Kevin MacDonald silly. Jewish cultural Marxism is not evidence of how un-white Jews are, but how assimilated they are into the western ruling class.

    Whether you prefer theory or empirical data, there is absolutely no doubt that it is the other way around. The gentile portion of the ruling class have assimilated to Jewish norms.

  81. @Steve Sailer
    Joe Dimaggio's dad, a San Francisco fisherman, was grounded for the duration to prevent him from, uh, teaming up with the Axis invasion fleet off the Golden Gate, or something. His son Dom made a point of this about 15 years ago: it wasn't just the Japanese.

    Joe Dimaggio’s dad, a San Francisco fisherman, was grounded for the duration to prevent him from, uh, teaming up with the Axis invasion fleet off the Golden Gate, or something. His son Dom made a point of this about 15 years ago: it wasn’t just the Japanese.

    It happened to German-Americans too, including one of my grandfathers.

  82. @Steve Sailer
    Joe Dimaggio's dad, a San Francisco fisherman, was grounded for the duration to prevent him from, uh, teaming up with the Axis invasion fleet off the Golden Gate, or something. His son Dom made a point of this about 15 years ago: it wasn't just the Japanese.

    Joe Dimaggio’s dad, a San Francisco fisherman, was grounded for the duration to prevent him from, uh, teaming up with the Axis invasion fleet off the Golden Gate, or something. His son Dom made a point of this about 15 years ago: it wasn’t just the Japanese.

    It happened to German-Americans too, including one of my grandfathers.

  83. @Steve Sailer
    Maybe he's not at all Jewish, but everybody else, Jews and gentiles alike, assumes he is, so his career has prospered as everybody in Ireland assumes he is secretly Jewish and therefore smart.

    "We're in big trouble. We need a smart Jewish lawyer."

    "But this Ireland. There are hardly any."

    "What about Peter Sutherland?"

    "Paddy? He's at Mass every Sunday morning."

    "It's obviously just an act."

    "Well, he does look Jewish ..."

    "So there's our secret smart Jewish lawyer!"

    "But he doesn't seem very smart."

    "That's probably just an act, too. A cunning bastard like him is just what we need."

    "Okay, we'll retain him."

    Maybe he’s not at all Jewish, but everybody else, Jews and gentiles alike, assumes he is, so his career has prospered as everybody in Ireland assumes he is secretly Jewish and therefore smart.

    My other grandfather had a German last name and an Old-Testament first name and made a fortune in the garment business. I’ve often wondered whether anyone made a mistaken assumption about his background.

  84. @Deduction
    It has an exact parallel among the Arabs. There isn't a Middle Eastern leader or person of influence whom their enemies do not accuse of being a secret Jew.

    It's kind of funny because I get the impression that Jews do the same thing, but with more of an emphasis on the positive, of course.

    In the latter case it is much more understandable and much less indicative of mental illness.

    I feel like if I could explain this issue, I would have great insight into many contemporary phenomena, but I really can't.

    Maybe because Jews can look like anything it is the easisest way to out someone from the group and reduce one's own shame from your fellow group member's behaviour. This would also then allow you to demonise them to the nth degree without incurring even more shame.

    Maybe this is why this type of thought predominates in areas of political thought where concepts like honour and shame predominate?

    It has an exact parallel among the Arabs. There isn’t a Middle Eastern leader or person of influence whom their enemies do not accuse of being a secret Jew.

    It’s not as if they’re never right. Wasn’t Qaddafi’s mother Jewish?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    A rumor spread by Qadaffi's enemies with no proof whatsoever. But you seem to be credulous about these claims.
    , @Deduction

    It’s not as if they’re never right. Wasn’t Qaddafi’s mother Jewish
     
    I really don't know but I do suspect not. After all, and repeating my point from before, everyone into the Middle East has been accused of being a secret Jew by their enemies.

    Ironically some Jews may, as you are doing too, pick up on these nonsenses from the ether, but then out of ethnic pride or out of liking to talk about their ethnicity, repeat these bizarre claims as true, which then furthers the rumours.
  85. @ben tillman

    It has an exact parallel among the Arabs. There isn’t a Middle Eastern leader or person of influence whom their enemies do not accuse of being a secret Jew.
     
    It's not as if they're never right. Wasn't Qaddafi's mother Jewish?

    A rumor spread by Qadaffi’s enemies with no proof whatsoever. But you seem to be credulous about these claims.

    • Replies: @Stubborn in Germany
    For decades, while Qaddafi was the champion of the Arab Muslim street everywhere, berating his fellow Arab rulers for not trying hard enough to destroy Israel, I never heard one peep from anyone about an alleged Jewish mother.

    Come the so-called Arab Spring, and suddenly he went from champion to pariah. Suddenly Muslims started telling the Jewish mother story all over the Internet, derisively suggesting that he could go claim exile in Israel. It's a familiar pattern.
    , @ben tillman

    A rumor spread by Qadaffi’s enemies with no proof whatsoever. But you seem to be credulous about these claims.
     
    Translation: I hate you.

    Now how about a real response that might shed light on the question?
  86. @Anonymous
    A rumor spread by Qadaffi's enemies with no proof whatsoever. But you seem to be credulous about these claims.

    For decades, while Qaddafi was the champion of the Arab Muslim street everywhere, berating his fellow Arab rulers for not trying hard enough to destroy Israel, I never heard one peep from anyone about an alleged Jewish mother.

    Come the so-called Arab Spring, and suddenly he went from champion to pariah. Suddenly Muslims started telling the Jewish mother story all over the Internet, derisively suggesting that he could go claim exile in Israel. It’s a familiar pattern.

  87. @Anonymous
    A rumor spread by Qadaffi's enemies with no proof whatsoever. But you seem to be credulous about these claims.

    A rumor spread by Qadaffi’s enemies with no proof whatsoever. But you seem to be credulous about these claims.

    Translation: I hate you.

    Now how about a real response that might shed light on the question?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    No, I don't hate you. However, you're the one who makes / accepts these claims of cryptic Jewish ancestry. You supply the proof.
  88. @ben tillman

    A rumor spread by Qadaffi’s enemies with no proof whatsoever. But you seem to be credulous about these claims.
     
    Translation: I hate you.

    Now how about a real response that might shed light on the question?

    No, I don’t hate you. However, you’re the one who makes / accepts these claims of cryptic Jewish ancestry. You supply the proof.

  89. @WhatEvvs
    LOL.

    The galling thing is that this blog is one of the few places to get an alternative realistic view of the migration crisis, in the US. It is simply impossible to read anything sensible in the major media.

    There used to be a guy named Bob Grant, who ran a call-in show in the NYC area. He was essentially a racist clown but he performed the same function that this blog does. He said that an alternative name for his show (the official name was The Bob Grant Show) would be: "Misery loves company."

    And so it is here.

    Why, given your observation on the zeitgeist, would anyone be “happy”, on the assumption that happiness typically correlates with optimism in the psychologically balanced?

    This place is a commune of daffy optimists compared to some blogs. Check out biasedbbc for an exotic example.

  90. @ben tillman

    It has an exact parallel among the Arabs. There isn’t a Middle Eastern leader or person of influence whom their enemies do not accuse of being a secret Jew.
     
    It's not as if they're never right. Wasn't Qaddafi's mother Jewish?

    It’s not as if they’re never right. Wasn’t Qaddafi’s mother Jewish

    I really don’t know but I do suspect not. After all, and repeating my point from before, everyone into the Middle East has been accused of being a secret Jew by their enemies.

    Ironically some Jews may, as you are doing too, pick up on these nonsenses from the ether, but then out of ethnic pride or out of liking to talk about their ethnicity, repeat these bizarre claims as true, which then furthers the rumours.

  91. […] migraci.Peter Sutherland je vysokým komisařem OSN pro mezinárodní migraci.Peter Sutherland řekl, že by Evropská unie měla podkopat homogenitu národních států.Peter Sutherland hrál […]

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.