The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Israel Shamir ArchiveBlogview
The Pink Revolution and How to Beat It
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
GoyBoy
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Colour revolutions usually occur only in the countries blessed with a US diplomatic presence. You need an American embassy to find the perspective ruler to be uplifted by a human swell and placed on the throne; you need an American embassy to bring in enough cash to cover expenses of the organised mayhem; you need an American diplomat to protect the revolutionaries and to order the present dictator to desist. Could it be that there is now an American Embassy in America?

The Great American Colour Revolution marches on. The script is very similar to the ones they have used overseas. Usually it includes toppled monuments. The pro-American forces toppled monuments to Saddam Hussein in Baghdad, to Felix Dzerzhinsky in Moscow, to Vladimir Lenin in Kiev, to the Russian soldier-liberator in Tallinn and Warsaw. And now the trend came back home to America like a boomerang, with toppling Confederate statues.

This is not meaningless vandalism, but a symbolic declaration of victory. The victorious side topples the monuments of the defeated. And the defeated spitefully grumble, but can’t do anything. However, watch their hands: everywhere and every time, the colour revolutionaries choose some dated memorials of little importance to the majority. This is a difference with real revolutions, where actual symbols of power go down.

A real revolution in France 1789 destroyed the Bastille, a real revolution in Russia 1917 destroyed the Tsar’s statues and took over the Winter Palace. A real revolution in the US will probably take over the Federal Reserve and topple statues of recent presidents. But colour revolutions are fake, faux-revolutions, so they choose an easy target. Lenin in Kiev, or Lee in Charlottesville were sitting ducks. Lenin’s cause had been defeated in 1990, a quarter century ago, while the cause General Robert Lee fought for had been defeated over 150 years ago. A lot of people are rather upset by their removal, but very few people would care enough to take up arms and defend them. It is a PR action, and a very effective one.

The wonderful Steve Sailer wrote: “The American deep state has taken down various opposing regimes via the mechanism of a Colour Revolution.” This is a good reading, but not a sufficient one. The force behind the colour revolutions, including the present American one, is not an American force, not even the American deep state, but a global one, serving the globalist elite and the shadowy world government. Until recently, they used US power for their ends, now they successfully fight the rising Golem of the United States as they fought much a weaker Ukraine or Sweden. “Golem, know thy place” is the incantation used by the Wizard of Prague, the creator of the Golem, in the medieval Jewish legend. This spell suborns the creature.

People close to power in the US know or feel the global hegemony. Its bearers are heavily Jewish liberal groups, who use their PC, their hostility to the Church, their approval of gender flux in order to undermine the mind and mentality of an ordinary American, of a redneck, of a working class Goy (as in the Goy, Bye headline). They ceaselessly tease and annoy this goy, in order to cause his premature acts of rebellion to be easily squashed. In order to spite the worker, they even put on the latest aircraft carrier only toilet bowls and no urinals ‚ to make it more comfortable for supposed transgenders and to enrage the rednecks.

The world globalists received a serious blow when their candidate Hillary Clinton lost the election, but they didn’t waste time and immediately mobilised for a fight. They aren’t going to give up hegemony. Practically all the media, judicial system, Congress, intelligence services are in their hands. Charlottesville provided an occasion to show rednecks in whose hands rests hegemony.

Hegemonists have their own storm troops – Antifa. This extremist movement was born in Germany. There they walk on the streets on the anniversary of Dresden bombings with Israeli flags and chant: “Death to Germany! Long live Bomber Harris” (the British commander of the Air Force, a big fan of the carpet bombing of Germany). They managed to terrorize the Germans: as soon as someone objects they call their opponent a Nazi and beat him up. And if they encounter resistance, the police comes to the rescue. That’s why in Germany resistance to the mass inflow of migrants was almost imperceptible. It is spoken about in the kitchen, but not on the streets.

And now Antifa came to America. They have the same mode of action as in Germany. Whoever is against them is a Nazi, or a “white racist”. They proved their mettle in Charlottesville, the city blessed with the Jewish mayor who chose the city police. Many Jewish activists came to participate, from as far as Boston. After the scuffle, the newspapers raised a hue and cry: Nazis attack Jews!

President Trump condemned both sides participating in the brawl‚ both white nationalists and Antifa. It is exactly what his opponents were waiting for. His attempt to stay above the brawl was doomed to defeat: liberal hegemonists immediately branded him a racist and neo-Nazi. Trump reminded them that not all defenders of the monument were white racists, but this argument didn’t work.

The public response to the dog-whistle “racist” was overwhelming. The Jews responded first. Rabbis said they do not want Trump to telephone them and greet them with the forthcoming Jewish High Holidays. 300 Jews, former Yale classmates of Mnuchin, the treasury secretary, imploring him to resign. (Aren’t there too many Jewish alumni in Yale? What about some diversity?)

ORDER IT NOW

A known Jewish writer Michael Chabon called upon Ivanka to kill her father, by magical means of going into full mourning for a still living President. Jews believe this should kill a living man as sure as a bullet. Chabon’s hysterical screed must be read to be believed. “Now you know [Trump is] an anti-Semite — a Nazi sympathizer, a friend of the Jew-hating Klan,” he declared. And more and more Jews came in calling to impeach Trump the racist and anti-Semite.

However, non-Jews meekly followed while Jews played them like a fiddle. Industrialists resigned from the presidential council, generals issued a rebuke to their Commander-in-Chief, thousands of non-Jews participated in marches and demonstrations against “white racists”. In short, Jews played as a team, and they dictated the rules. Very, very few persons offered a learned defence of Trump. They would be ostracised, if they did, and Trump proved he is not going to stand for his friends. If his position on Flynn didn’t make it clear, his dismissal of Bannon supplied the sterling proof.

In the present political climate, you are not allowed to speak against the hegemonist view. If you do, you are a white racist, i.e. your opinion is not simply rejected, but it is declared as an unlawful and inadmissible view. This is what hegemony is: when an opposed view is delegitimised.

One can argue for racism (it is anyway better than greed, a mortal sin; it is a natural defence of a tribal territory), but it is a hard way, and quite futile. Before Trump the Racist, there was Trump the Russian Spy, and he was preceded by Trump the Pussy Grabber. New reasons for impeachment will be found, surely.

It is easier to turn the racism weapon against the adversary, for the Jewish adversary of Trump is as racist as any KKK member is likely to be, or worse. Last week it became known, that in Israel, Jewish settlers established a road sign saying: “The area where you are located is under Jewish control. The entry of Arabs is absolutely forbidden and constitutes a mortal danger to you!” You couldn’t find such signs in the Deep South even in Jim Crow days! Was there any response from “antiracist” American Jews? (This is a rhetoric question).

One issue of a Jewish newspaper daily would supply you with sufficient amount of Jewish racism exemplified. Here is a Rabbi calling to exterminate goyim (like vermin they are), here are Jews stealing Palestinian land, here are Jewish judges who approve of a obvious thievery as it delivers Christian houses into Jewish hands.

Is it something Trump doesn’t know? If he knows why doesn’t he use it for his defence? This is not a rhetoric question. The answer to it is that he decided to ally with the Zionist Jews against Liberal Jews. This is the method tried by the Far Right in France, Britain, the Netherlands, Sweden. Perhaps it was useful for a while (to get access to the mainstream media) but like every immoral device this one has a limited shelf life. Zionists are a hedging fund of the Jewish People, betting against the governing paradigm. They can’t endear you with the owners of mass media, their status at the World Government is dubious to the extreme. Zionist Jews can – for a while – defend you from an accusation in anti-Semitism, but they will stab you in the back whenever expedient.

It’s not that the Zionist Jews are good for nothing. Zionists are good for one thing. They are excellent for revealing the hidden Jewish racism. Palestinian activists – and there are Jews among them, too – can explain that to the Americans. Alison Weir’s book and site are called If Americans Knew, and it is built for such a purpose. Norman Finkelstein can add to that, and so can quite a few Jews and non-Jews with experience of pro-Palestinian activism.

It is possible to beat the Jews and their entourage in the Blame-the-Racist game by attacking Israeli racism. Actually, this is the only method that works, as the other methods do not. Bannon proclaimed his Zionism, and he ended with Goy, Bye. Richard Spencer said he loves Israel, and became a pariah. Now President Trump went down the same path leading to defeat and oblivion. American nationalists who support Zionism lose their moral superiority and get nothing in exchange.

Taking a position against Israeli racism is not only moral, it is practical and realistic. It is the way to solve the Israeli – Palestinian conflict. Demand that Israel drop its Jim Crow laws. Let the Palestinians have equal rights, the same as Jews in the Holy Land. Let them have a right to vote, equal employment, freedom of movement in the same buses as the Jews.

A separate independent Palestinian state is not good enough, especially bearing in mind that the Jews aren’t likely to grant it. Remind them that the Jewish Freedom Riders did not support an idea of separate Bantustans for the Blacks, but demanded equality for Blacks and Whites in the whole United States of America. The same attitude should be applied in Israel/Palestine. This is the solution to the problem.

If you want to troll them a bit, call for removal of a memorial for a Jewish slave-driver David Levy Yulee, who was called “the Florida Fire Eater” for his inflammatory pro-slavery rhetoric in the U.S. Senate. He resigned his US Senate seat to support the Confederacy, but his statue still stands high in Fernandia, Amelia Island, Florida, reports Michael Hoffman who notes that neither the ADL nor the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) called for it removal. This is the time to demand Florida to overturn its (year 2000) designation of Yulee a “Great Floridian”.

ORDER IT NOW

I’d advise president Trump: Appeal to the better side of human nature. If your fellow Americans want less racism, give it to them – by rejecting Zionism. And proceed with your agenda. I watched with great satisfaction that you laid off North Korea and referred to Jeff Bezos, your enemy. However, your Afghanistan proposal is a mistake. It will give you no kudos. It would be better to stick to the original plan, that is to cut losses and withdraw from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria before shrewd Netanyahu can embroil you in a war not of your choosing. Begin to pull back home troops and bases. Go Obama one better: demolish Guantanamo and return it to the Cubans, with the remaining inmates. Let them deal with the tenants.

It is quite unnecessary to antagonise Blacks. There is no profit in it. They are not against you, they are not against whites, they are not even against white nationalists. They are partly white, as a rule. Yes, present diversity-driven overestimation of Blacks’ contribution to the American civilisation can be annoying, especially as it is supposed to provide cover for the exceedingly high rate of their incarceration. Deal with it. There are by far too many inmates in the US Gulag. Bring their number down to the level of, say, 1970. Undo Clinton’s draconian laws. You will be called Trump the Liberator, and the main reason for artificial aggrandisement of the blacks will vanish.

A colour revolution can be defeated by being stern of purpose. You are a golfer: keep your eyes on the ball, Mr President.

Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@israelshamir.net

This article was first published at The Unz Review.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Deep State, Donald Trump, Israel Lobby, Zionism 
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Fine sentiment!

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @American Russian
    While affirming the the thing it condemnes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /ishamir/the-pink-revolution-and-how-to-beat-it/#comment-1983754
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Okay, Israel! Excellent analysis of some of Trump’s crucial political goofs! Thank you, and I hope President Trump reads this.

    Read More
  3. Brabantian says: • Website

    Israel Shamir has some terrific but sadly likely-only-dream-world recommendations for Donald Trump, asking him to be the man whom voters hoped he was … how beautiful it would be indeed, for Trump to end the Mid-East & South Asian wars, close Guantánamo, let hundreds of thousands of non-violent black & other offenders / railroaded innocents out of US prison (as Vladimir Putin did for hundreds of thousands of Russian prisoners) … this last an especially brilliant suggestion by Shamir, as that one Lincolnesque act would be a total trumping of the ‘racist’ slurs against Trump & his voters

    But the question is … Can we really hope that the USA ‘Tsar’ will or could act well & honourably for his people? Was Trump just the Master New York Salesman all along? Or is it that Trump in his heart really wanted to do some good with that high office he was able to win … Trump who trumpeted to the world the great truth that the News is Fake … but a Trump who is in fact now in part a hostage under the direst threats, not only against himself but all his family? As this photo meme suggested

    Read More
    • Replies: @Huggbear
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHbrOg092GA

    Too old to worry about anything other than "giving back" with a romantic idea about the "American Dream" with a Christian Worldview - I have every confidence that Mr Trump's "heart" is in the right place for his mission.

    His problem is "Draining the Swamp" - which if you look at the above video explains how it is composed with elements of the SHADOW government and the DEEP STATE.

    Until this battle is over - wheel spinning will be the order of the day and progress against the Vision will be slow.

    We have seen however that he is nothing if not dedicated to the mission but the recent foray back to Afghanistan shows that he has to make some compromises.
  4. The truth of the matter is that there were for a long time, right into the mid twentieth century, Sundown Towns. These had posted signs barring non-whites from being within the city limits after dark. A number of them were even in Oregon, which explicitly barred them from residency. So there is some equivalence with the modern Settler signs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Such places in the US no longer exist.

    In "that shitty little country" they most certainly do, and much worse.

    Get serious, hasbarist.

    , @OilcanFloyd
    @ Fran Macadam:

    Israel's treatment of non-Jews is far worse than anything that ever happened to blacks under Jim Crow, or even slavery, in North America. Blacks in the South were never napalmed, their neighborhoods have never been attacked by military aircraft or shelled and attacked by tanks or infantry. Blacks have never faced all out war, or anything close to it, and there was never an attempt or real desire to genocide them.
  5. Huggbear says:

    Is it possible to be anti-Zionist without being anti-Semitic?

    I think they would because the term has very bad connotations now. It has morphed its original meaning, but the short answer is definitely YES although most Jews in California would not agree.

    Let’s try and understand :

    There is great confusion about what Zionism actually means and how it is defined and where the term arose from. To understand ANTI-ZIONISM it is good to understand a little history.

    HOW THE TERM AROSE

    Zion is a hill near Jerusalem (now in the city), widely symbolizing the Land of Israel. Zionism was nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land.

    WHY ZIONISM AROSE

    [MORE]

    Since the first centuries CE, most Jews have lived outside the Land of Israel (Eretz Israel, better known as Palestine), although there has been a constant minority presence of Jews. According to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Eretz Israel was a land CONDITIONALLY promised to the Jews by God according to the Hebrew and Greek Bibles and the Quran, respectively but conditional upon righteous behaviour.

    The Diaspora began in 586 BCE during the Babylonian occupation of Israel. The Babylonians destroyed the First Temple took the Israelites back to Babylon, which was central to Jewish culture at the time and gave rise to their venerated “book” – The Babylonian Talmud.

    Many subsequently returned to Israel to rebuild the Temple when the Babylonian King died and set about rebuilding the Temple.

    After the 1st century Great Revolt and the 2nd century Bar Kokhba revolt , the Roman Empire expelled the Jews from Judea , changing the name to “Syria Palaestina”.

    The Bar Kokhba revolt caused a spike in anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution. The ensuing exile from Judea greatly increased the percent of Jews who were dispersed throughout the Diaspora instead of living in their original home intermarrying with other races kept the numbers up along with the mass conversion of Khazaria to Judaism in the 8th Century. ( these “new” Jews subsequently populated the Polish hinterland known as “The Pale of the Settlement” and spoke Yiddish. They are the original Ashkenaz.

    In the 17th century Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676) announced himself as the Messiah and gained many Jews to his side, forming a base in Salonika. He first tried to establish a settlement in Gaza, but moved later to Smyrna. After deposing the old rabbi Aaron Lapapa in the spring of 1666, the Jewish community of Avignon France, prepared to emigrate to the new kingdom.

    The readiness of the Jews of the time to believe the messianic claims of Sabbatai Zevi may be largely explained by the desperate state of Central European Jewry in the mid-17th century. The bloody pogroms of Bohdan Khmelnytsky had wiped out one-third of the Jewish population and destroyed many centres of Jewish learning and communal life due to their association with Usurious practices and the Talmudic “Worldview” .

    Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in central and eastern Europe as a national revival movement, in reaction to anti-Semitic and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe.

    Soon after this most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired state in Palestine, then an area controlled by the Ottoman Empire.

    A religious variety of Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity defined as adherence to religious Judaism, opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies, and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be a majority nation in their own state.

    There are other varieties of Zionism. One called cultural Zionism was founded and represented most prominently by Ahad Ha’am, fostered a secular vision of a Jewish “spiritual centre” in Israel, this is to be contrasted with Political Zionism which was established with the political goal of creating a Jewish state in order to create a nation where Jews could be the majority, rather than the minority they were in the many nations in the diaspora.

    THE AUTHOR OF MODERN POLITICAL ZIONISM

    Theodor Herzl, is considered the ideological father of Zionism, considered Anti-Semitism as an eternal feature of all societies in which Jews lived as minorities, and that only a separation could allow Jews to escape eternal prosecution.

    “Let them give us sovereignty over a piece of of the Earth’s surface, just sufficient for the needs of our people, then we will do the rest!” he proclaimed exposing his plan.”

    Major aspects of the Zionist idea are represented in the Israeli Declaration of Independence :

    1.The Land of Israel was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped. Here they first attained to statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance and gave to the world the eternal Book of Books.

    2.After being forcibly exiled from their land, the people kept faith with it throughout their Dispersion and never ceased to pray and hope for their return to it and for the restoration in it of their political freedom.

    3.Impelled by this historic and traditional attachment, Jews strove in every successive generation to re-establish themselves in their ancient homeland. In recent decades they returned in their masses.

    Herzl came to reject his early ideas regarding Jewish emancipation and assimilation and to believe that the Jews must remove themselves from Europe and create their own state. Beginning in late 1895, Herzl wrote “Der Judenstaat” (The State of the Jews), which was published February 1896 to immediate acclaim and controversy.

    The book argued that the Jewish people should leave Europe if they wished to, either for Argentina or, preferably, for Palestine, their historic homeland. The Jews possessed a nationality; all they were missing was a nation and a state of their own.

    In “Der Judenstaat” he writes:

    “The Jewish question persists wherever Jews live in appreciable numbers. Wherever it does not exist, it is brought in together with Jewish immigrants. We are naturally drawn into those places where we are not persecuted, and our appearance there gives rise to persecution. This is the case, and will inevitably be so, everywhere, even in highly civilised countries—see, for instance, France—so long as the Jewish question is not solved on the political level.”

    Only through a Jewish state could they avoid anti-Semitism, express their culture freely and practice their religion without hindrance.

    Herzl’s ideas spread rapidly throughout the Jewish world and attracted international attention. Supporters of existing Zionist movements, such as the Hovevei Zion, immediately allied themselves with him, but establishment Jewry vilified him and considered his ideas as a threat to their attempts at integration and a rebellion against God.

    The book concludes:

    “Therefore I believe that a wondrous generation of Jews will spring into existence. The Maccabeans will rise again. Let me repeat once more my opening words:

    The Jews who wish for a State will have it.We shall live at last as free men on our own soil, and die peacefully in our own homes.The world will be freed by our liberty, enriched by our wealth, magnified by our greatness. And whatever we attempt there to accomplish for our own welfare, will react powerfully and beneficially for the good of humanity”

    Herzl publicly met Wilhelm II in 1898. The meeting significantly advanced Herzl’s and Zionism’s legitimacy in Jewish and world opinion.

    Unlike Herzl, the founder of political Zionism, Ahad Ha’am strived for Israel to be “a Jewish state and not merely a state of Jews”.

    ANTI-ZIONISM

    Advocates of Zionism view it as a national liberation movement for the repatriation of a persecuted people residing as minorities in a variety of nations, to the homeland to which they had a historical connection.

    Throughout the first decade of the Zionist movement, there were several instances where Zionist figures supported a Jewish state in places outside Palestine, such as Uganda and Argentina. Even Theodor Herzl, the founder of political Zionism was initially content with any Jewish self-governed state.

    However, other Zionists emphasized the memory, emotion and myth linking Jews to the Land of Israel and migrations began to Holy Land.

    Despite using Zion as the name of the movement (a name after the Jebusite fortress in Jerusalem, which became synonymous with Jerusalem), Palestine only became Herzl’s main focus after his Zionist manifesto ‘Judenstaat’ was published in 1896, but even then he was hesitant.

    In 1903, British Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain offered Herzl 5,000 square miles in the Uganda Protectorate for Jewish settlement. Called the Uganda Scheme, it was introduced the same year to the World Zionist Organization’s Congress at its sixth meeting, where a fierce debate ensued.

    It should also be noted that throughout the 1930s when MOST European countries were asking Jews to leave their countries not just Germany, there was a progressive exodus eastward through Germany where camps were built to house the mass migration on their way. Some of these later turned into the extermination camps of the Holocaust as Nazism began to oppose Zionism and, arguably, its progeny Communism / Bolshevism.

    In the early days both Hitler and the World Zionist organisation shared the same objective of populating Palestine with returning Jews. The agreement between Hitler and the Zionist movement was known as the Ha’avara Agreement. In other words most European countries wanted the Jews OUT and the reason for this is another long discussion but boils down to their “Worldview” fostered by the Babylonian Talmud and the focus on Usurious business practices. Europe, at that time, was principally Catholic and viewed USURY and SODOMY as category partners in immorality.

    More worrying is the discussion topic promoted by the Rothschild dynasty in the World Zionist Conference in the early 1900s that discuss Zionism becoming a World Dominant Ideology with NWO ambitions.

    Critics of Zionism view it as a colonialist,racist and exceptionalist ideology that led advocates to violence during Mandatory Palestine, followed by the forced exodus of Palestinians, and the subsequent denial of their human rights.

    Furthermore the Zionist Ashkenazi sect have NWO order aspirations and push their worldview through the Neo-Con movement that has taken Washington captive since 1991. They formulated the PNAC ( Plan for the New American Century) and leading policies like “Open Immigration” that destroy American and indeed Western Nations from within by using Muslims as the “tip of the spear” to destroy our inherited culture.

    When a “Group” that governs the political agenda of the USA – TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE USA – requires a very serious spotlight on them.New American Century (PNAC), which has essentially dictated Bush regime “defense” policies since early 2001:

    These PNACzi’s. Credited with this incredible yet frightening nonsense are the following higher-ups in the current false US “presidential” regime: Paul Wolfowitz, then with the Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University I. Lewis Libby, then with the Wall Street firm of Dechert Price & Rhoads … and the following well-known “neo-cons” and for the most part Zionists:

    1. Roger Barnett, U.S. Naval War College Alvin Bernstein, National Defense University
    2. Stephen Cambone, National Defense University
    3. Eliot Cohen, Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
    4. Devon Gaffney Cross, Donors’ Forum for International Affairs
    5. Thomas Donnelly, Project for the New American Century
    6. David Epstein, Office of Secretary of Defense, Net Assessment
    7. David Fautua, Lt. Col., U.S. Army
    8. Dan Goure, Center for Strategic and International Studies
    9. Donald Kagan, Yale University
    10. Fred Kagan, U. S. Military Academy at West Point
    11. Robert Kagan, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
    12. Robert Killebrew, Col., USA (Ret.)
    13. William Kristol, The Weekly Standard
    14. Mark Lagon, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
    15. James Lasswell, GAMA Corporation Robert Martinage, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
    16. Phil Meilinger, U.S. Naval War College
    17. Mackubin Owens, U.S. Naval War College
    18. Steve Rosen, Harvard University
    19. Gary Schmitt, Project for the New American Century
    20. Abram Shulsky, The RAND Corporation
    21. Michael Vickers, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
    22. Barry Watts, Northrop Grumman Corporation
    23. Dov Zakheim, System Planning Corporation .

    If a particular group become a Power Elite and manage a country to the detriment of the Nationalist structures in a non patriotic way we are bound to ask Why? and what is the common link between them, namely, Zionism, for this is the Political Ideology that is confused with the “homeland” idea.

    Thus the new anti-Zionism and is being incorrectly equated with anti-Semitism emanates from the far-right, the political left, and a growing Muslim population within European nations. A statistical analysis shows that 150 million people across Europe have “serious anti-Semitic” or “demonic view of Israel” because of conflation of all Israelis with this poisenous ideology.

    Cooper, Abraham and Harold Brackman. “Hitler’s e-book blitzkrieg.(http://www.jewishjournal.com/cul&#8230 ;) *Jewish Journal*. 15 January 2014. 15 January 2014.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Zionism is a loaded term which can mean many different things as a consultation of Wikipedia will inform you. Generally, the Anti-Zionists will be those who oppose the territorial claims as set out in the Zionist agenda of 1919 and illustrated in the map at the top of this blog.

    The “homeland” of the Jews in a State that is pluralist within the geographic boundaries that comply partially with the conditionality of the “Abrahamic covenant”, the territorial gains by successive wars, the sanction of international Law, the support of the UN , the recognition of the Palestinians . These latter who numbered 1 million in 1948 compared with the Jews 300,000 in that land.

    Thus what we have is a complex and developing issue that could lead to Nuclear Wars and which is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon and certainly not under the current American Neo-con influences.

    Drain that Swamp and fast!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Wow, your first and only post!

    Cheap that you are using a variation on an existing commenter's u-name.

    Also funny how your attempted essay becomes totally disjointed before the list of early neo-cons, which from my reading is far from being representative or comprehensive, many on the iist just seem to be crypto-Zionists, not neo-cons as such.

    People forget that, on Einstein's vaunted world tour, he was only Herzl's puppy dog, or show pony. This may be particular to Japan.
    , @Delinquent Snail
    Im case others want more info on this


    "The hidden history of zionism"
    http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/index.htm


    The Pentagon's "highland forum" (and how the deepstate infiltrated tech giants, google, facebook, amazon)
    https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

    More and more people are becoming aware of the "elephant in the room" and its only a matter of time before it hits a critical mass.
    , @Joe Levantine
    "...that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land."
    While I load your energy and effort at producing such an analysis, I think that your article would have far more factual value if you were to omit the " re" from re-establishment.
    The problem with the biblical stories is that there has been almost no archeological evidence to substantiate it. One illuminated Israeli archeologist who candidly exposed the by local myth was the late Yigal Yadin who stated categorically that there is no proof whatsoever of the existence of the city of Jerico. So far, the Israelis after decades of occupation of the West Bank have failed miserably to unearth archeological evidence related to the temple of Jerusalem. So they proclaimed the remaining wall of the Roman fortress of Antonia as an archeological proof of the temple.
  6. Brawling street-fighting rabbles do not a revolutionary civil war make. You need snipers on rooftops. Every perspective ruler knows that.

    Read More
  7. LauraMR says:

    Correction. It is not a globalist elite but a galactic elite.

    Ancient aliens, people, ancient aliens.

    Read More
  8. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Welcome to the NWO Comrade. The USA will become the USSA, please report to your nearest FEMA Gulag for reeducation…NOW! Don’t force us to kick down your door at 3 am.

    What do we know about RAM? [An offshoot of Antifa] Well, according to their website:

    “The Revolutionary Abolitionist Movement is a political movement dedicated to freeing people from bondage and building resistance in the United States.”

    Just like every other Antifa group, they oppose white supremacy, racism, and bigotry. Seems reasonable, right? But read a little further into their “Political Foundation” and you will find a few things that aren’t so reasonable.

    They advocate for the abolition of gender:

    They advocate for the expropriation of good, lands, and tools:

    And finally, just like every other Antifa group, they oppose capitalism and are open proponents of communism.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-25/armed-antifa-group-hosts-%E2%80%9Cour-enemies-blue%E2%80%9D-anti-police-workshop

    Read More
  9. This article is an accurate indictment of forces at work in America that don’t bode well for our future as a great power. So be it. We have never demonstrated an affinity for world leadership. The same tendencies that led to the schism the preceded our Civil War have risen again in global affairs. The materialism and cupidity that so rankled the South in 1861 became the m.o. of the victors and shape us today. This won’t do. Eurasia has had enough and is turning away from US influence as rapidly as feasible considering the tendency for rabid violence we exhibit.

    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Maple Curtain
    "...forces at work in America that don’t bode well for our future as a great power."

    Your choice of words is instructive about the type of brainwashing to which the American people have been subjected.

    You, an individual American, are not a great power, and neither you, nor 99.9% of Americans gain one thing positive from the projection of American military might around the world.

    Yet, you, and far too many other Americans have been brainwashed into believing that you gain some benefit, even if only psychological, from American might brutalizing the peoples of this earth.

    That makes you, and anyone else who has every sought psychological refuge in the pride of "our" being a great power, a dupe, a pawn.

    Time to snap out of it.

    n.b. I am not an American, but, lest anyone confuse my comment for an anti-American screed, I am very pro-American people, having found Americans to be the friendliest and most generous of spirit of all peoples, and especially unlike those in the smug heartless gulag to the north of you in which I reside.

  10. Zionists are good for one thing. They are excellent for revealing the hidden Jewish racism.

    True.

    They’re also good at presenting themselves as something they’re not, (just like Trump, btw).

    They present themselves as victims, while the opposite is more accurate.

    They present themselves as Semites, while Palestinians are probably much more “Semitic” than they are. Zionists, in fact, are among the most anti-Semitic characters around.

    They present themselves as Jews, and i’d like to know by what standard. Most are likely not even religious.

    They present themselves as sane and “intelligent,” but their actions don’t show it.

    We’re told that they are moral; I’d like to know how.

    They are good for showing the world what crazed narcissism looks like.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greg Bacon
    Antifa is a bunch of spoiled rotten brats whose parents catered to their every whim, desire and want. Now that they are in the REAL world, they find that it's tough going, no one is handing them riches and mansions, that you have to work for, so it's time to riot, hiding behind noble sounding causes, which is nothing more than Uncle Joe's brand of Communism; Take what you want from others. If they object, kill them.

    The white males they abhor is code for the deplorables that had the nerve to NOT for the Killer Queen Hillary and for that insult, they must be made to pay.
    , @Wally
    "They’re also good at presenting themselves as something they’re not, (just like Trump, btw)."

    The alternative was ...... Hillary.
    , @Joe Levantine
    Short and sweet comment but condenses in it a mighty historic truth. Turning the victim into an aggressor and a villain is one art that Zionists have mastered and at which they are second to none.
  11. The Scalpel says: • Website

    ” You are a golfer: keep your eyes on the ball, Mr President.”

    Too late

    Read More
  12. Ragno says:

    Now that both Gavin McInnes and Kathy Shaidle have flown the coop, I implore the staff at Takimag to begin carrying the invaluable Israel Shamir.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Shamir does not give nearly enough slobbering to WASP culture to be acceptable to Brimelow and Derbyshire.
  13. The key to ending Zionist control of America is to abolish the Zionist privately owned Federal Reserve which creates money out 0f thin air and loans this ether created money to the government at interest and with the creation of this money Zionists control not only the banks and Wallstreet but every facet of life in America.

    The secondary Zionist control mechanism is the IRS which was put into place along with the FED in 1913 to allow we Americans to be forced to pay for their Zionist created wars which include WWI and WWll and the Korean war and the Vietnam war and Afghanistan and Iraq and Libya and Syria and Yemen and a host of others that have gone on and are going on under the radar.

    Why in the hell the author mentioned that opposing the Fed was a bad idea is beyond me, for as long as the Fed and the IRS exist we are slaves on the Zionist plantation aka America aka OCEANIA.

    Interested parties can read Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Anthony Sutton and The Protocols of Zion and Orwells 1984.

    Read More
  14. As the Dutch beeldenstorm, at the beginning of our 80 year struggle with Spain shows, destroying of statues and monuments not necessarily has anything to to with colour.
    It may be that Dutch whites are a bit whiter than Spanish whites, but that is all.

    The destruction by mobs, protestant, of statues in catholic churches was the result of a fatal decision, Karel V, who resided in Brussels, and ruled the present Netherlands, Belgium and the present Spain, sent his son Philips II to Madrid to be eucated.
    Karel knew that he ruled a multi cultural empire, where wealth was produced in the tolerant north.
    Businessmen are no interested in religion or culture, they are interested in business, profitable business.

    Philips was educated by catholic clergy in a feudal society, the north, in the view of the Spanish clergy was an immoral rabble.
    And so, from Madrid, Philips hardly ever visited his northern realm, difficult to get there, a hostile France was in between, tried to convert the rabble to his standards.
    He failed, the small Holland, through cunning and luck, was able to play off the powers, France, England, Spain and the Ottoman empire, against each other.

    Spanish troops did not help, they increased the hatred of the north against the south.
    Dutch floods, frozen lakes, marshes, the flooding of low lying land, well fortified cities with a determined population after Spanish troops had massacred the Antwerp population did not make the task easy for troops used to Spanish conditions.
    Dutch coastal waters with ebb and flood movements prevent big Spanish warships to use their firing power.
    In this struggle the symbols of the hated catholic Spaniards, statues, beelden, were stormed, and hacked to pieces.
    Great pity, from an art perspective.

    What the outcome of the present USA Cold Civil War will be, right now is uncertain.
    Sure is to me that in hundred years from now the effort to destroy an important part of USA history will be regretted, but alas common sense never ruled the world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    Maybe you are aware that many Spanish think being lackeys of the (imported from the "north") Hapsburg "royals" during that period was a disaster for Spain? They inherited Carlos II (Karel II) from the Hapsberg Netherlands and are not at all bothered by the fact that the Spanish branch of the House of Hapsberg became extinct.
  15. wayfarer says:


    Warning: This Video Is Not Politically Correct. If You’re Easily Triggered, Make Sure to View It Within a Safe Space.

    Outnumbered Ten to One, a Group of Olympia Washington Street Kids Take on Marxist Antifa Rioters.

    Read More
  16. Hegemonists have their own storm troops – Antifa. This extremist movement was born in Germany. There they walk on the streets on the anniversary of Dresden bombings with Israeli flags and chant: “Death to Germany! Long live Bomber Harris” (the British commander of the Air Force, a big fan of the carpet bombing of Germany). They managed to terrorize the Germans: as soon as someone objects they call their opponent a Nazi and beat him up. And if they encounter resistance, the police comes to the rescue.

    Does this really happen, Israel??

    dear god where does it end.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thoot
    The Confederacy lost the war they launched on the US. Even Robert E Lee himself counseled that putting up statues to Confederates was ill-advised and would only serve to keep the tensions of war alive. It's the United States, not the Union-Confederate States. For what possible reason should there be statues honoring those who waged war on the US?

    The reason is based in the fact that most of the statues were put up during the Jim Crow era as a way to emphasize that "we lost the war but we still advocate oppression of non-whites." That aim was made clear in much of the rhetoric around their construction.


    I'd guess that at least 50% of the people defending the statues know little of how/why they were put up. But whether one loathes antifa or not - the fact that a bunch of neo-Nazis and other white supremacists are defending the statues makes it clear what they represent.
  17. fnn says:

    Fine, but Shamir, who is pro-Communist, fails to bring up the crimes of the Jewish Bolsheviks.

    As if you all didn’t know:

    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

    https://archive.org/stream/StalinsWillingExecutioners/StalinsWillingExecutioners_djvu.txt

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    I know nothing about Shamir as Bolshevik apologist. I know he stresses the horrors the Nazis committed in Eastern Europe, which were ended only by advancing Soviet troops.

    I do know this: there are only two things that could cause decent, common sense folk to give a thought to post-Trotskyite Marxism (meaning, Marxism no longer focused on being a Jewish arm of genocide aimed at white cultures). 1 is resurgent and well armed Islam. The other is the EWASP-Jewish alliance.

    The British WASPs and now the AmericanWASPs have done both.
  18. fnn says:

    1. I have never read an article dripping with so much evil in my life.I've annotated it for you.Enjoy. pic.twitter.com/J08YV9KXBx— Alba Gu Brath (@Alba_Rising) August 23, 2017

    Read More
  19. Greg Bacon says: • Website
    @jacques sheete

    Zionists are good for one thing. They are excellent for revealing the hidden Jewish racism.
     
    True.

    They're also good at presenting themselves as something they're not, (just like Trump, btw).

    They present themselves as victims, while the opposite is more accurate.

    They present themselves as Semites, while Palestinians are probably much more "Semitic" than they are. Zionists, in fact, are among the most anti-Semitic characters around.

    They present themselves as Jews, and i'd like to know by what standard. Most are likely not even religious.

    They present themselves as sane and "intelligent," but their actions don't show it.

    We're told that they are moral; I'd like to know how.

    They are good for showing the world what crazed narcissism looks like.

    Antifa is a bunch of spoiled rotten brats whose parents catered to their every whim, desire and want. Now that they are in the REAL world, they find that it’s tough going, no one is handing them riches and mansions, that you have to work for, so it’s time to riot, hiding behind noble sounding causes, which is nothing more than Uncle Joe’s brand of Communism; Take what you want from others. If they object, kill them.

    The white males they abhor is code for the deplorables that had the nerve to NOT for the Killer Queen Hillary and for that insult, they must be made to pay.

    Read More
  20. Wally says:
    @Fran Macadam
    The truth of the matter is that there were for a long time, right into the mid twentieth century, Sundown Towns. These had posted signs barring non-whites from being within the city limits after dark. A number of them were even in Oregon, which explicitly barred them from residency. So there is some equivalence with the modern Settler signs.

    Such places in the US no longer exist.

    In “that shitty little country” they most certainly do, and much worse.

    Get serious, hasbarist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Fran Macadam
    That's as dumb, and factually deficient, as insulting everyone you disagree with as a Nazi.

    He don't know me vewwy well, do he?
  21. Wally says:
    @jacques sheete

    Zionists are good for one thing. They are excellent for revealing the hidden Jewish racism.
     
    True.

    They're also good at presenting themselves as something they're not, (just like Trump, btw).

    They present themselves as victims, while the opposite is more accurate.

    They present themselves as Semites, while Palestinians are probably much more "Semitic" than they are. Zionists, in fact, are among the most anti-Semitic characters around.

    They present themselves as Jews, and i'd like to know by what standard. Most are likely not even religious.

    They present themselves as sane and "intelligent," but their actions don't show it.

    We're told that they are moral; I'd like to know how.

    They are good for showing the world what crazed narcissism looks like.

    “They’re also good at presenting themselves as something they’re not, (just like Trump, btw).”

    The alternative was …… Hillary.

    Read More
  22. Jake says:

    Another masterpiece by Israel Shamir.

    What I would add is that this Global Deep State grew out of the American Deep State, which grew out of the English Deep State.

    And as the Anglo-Saxon Puritans were Judaizing heretics who hoped to practice genocide on white Christians who were NOT WASPs, it was a given that WASPs would ally with Jews. And it then was inevitable that eventually the Jews would replace the WASPs at the top of that partnership.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    Nothing in what I've read about Puritans accords with the picture you paint. They were more properly "sticklers" (versus Puritans) for wishing to admit into religious practice only that which was dictated by scripture. Vestments, stained glass windows, organs, and bishops weren't in the Bible so none of that. The Anglicans, not unreasonably, asked why not permit anything not prohibited by scripture?

    Predestination was a strange idea that wafted over from Geneva but it hardly seems like a Jewish graft. Nothing about them seems to have been Jewish so far as I know but Cambridge provided many very learned men to the Puritan ranks. Presumably some were learned in Hebrew, but so were some learned in Greek. Were Puritans also hellenized heretics?

    Puritans were different from the rejectionist Pilgrims who would not accept anything relating to the CoE. Things did not go well for these types. However, Puritans sought an accommodation with the Church and, when departing for Salem, swore allegiance to it and the king as required. Hardly raging heretics. Catholics bore the brunt of that moniker.

    Your genocide point is absurd.
  23. iffen says:

    You couldn’t find such signs in the Deep South even in Jim Crow days!

    Well, if you want to be factual, you should read up on sun-down towns.

    Read More
  24. Jake says:
    @fnn
    Fine, but Shamir, who is pro-Communist, fails to bring up the crimes of the Jewish Bolsheviks.

    As if you all didn't know:
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

    https://archive.org/stream/StalinsWillingExecutioners/StalinsWillingExecutioners_djvu.txt

    I know nothing about Shamir as Bolshevik apologist. I know he stresses the horrors the Nazis committed in Eastern Europe, which were ended only by advancing Soviet troops.

    I do know this: there are only two things that could cause decent, common sense folk to give a thought to post-Trotskyite Marxism (meaning, Marxism no longer focused on being a Jewish arm of genocide aimed at white cultures). 1 is resurgent and well armed Islam. The other is the EWASP-Jewish alliance.

    The British WASPs and now the AmericanWASPs have done both.

    Read More
    • Replies: @fnn
    I agree, the last person I was almost ready to kill was a pompous Englishman.


    But we have to remember the Soviets introduced their own horrors to Eastern Europe when they took it over:
    https://archive.org/details/TheAnti-humans

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zgoda_labour_camp


    A diligent researcher would no doubt find similar facilities in Hungary and the Baltic States.

    , @fnn

    I do know this: there are only two things that could cause decent, common sense folk to give a thought to post-Trotskyite Marxism (meaning, Marxism no longer focused on being a Jewish arm of genocide aimed at white cultures).
     
    Neo-Marxism (Marxism without the crackpot economics, originally a critical adaptation of classical economics) is more committed to genocide of white culture than ever. That should be obvious. It's seen in its crudest forms with the "antifa" and the "white privilege" proselytizers. All the formerly Marxist organizations and parties of the West have adopted this "cultural Marxist" ideology, so the relationship is proven cladistically.
    , @Pete22
    Can you point out these communities of WASPS, on par with Jewish communities in size and ethnopolitical coherence (or even recognizable as ethnopolitically coherent whatsoever), who have supposedly allied themselves with Jews and thus who would supposedly enjoy the same political advantages that Jews enjoy?

    Thought not.

    Where are they? Not in NYC. Not in Chicago. Not in LA. Not in San Francisco. Where are they hiding? In Burlington, Vermont? That's a long commute to exercise the power that is always incubated at the prole community level (see Jews). A few WASPS at the end of hidden driveways don't constitute a measurable political group who can do anything in regard to supporting the continuance of Anglos, even in the upper class.
  25. Jake says:
    @Ragno
    Now that both Gavin McInnes and Kathy Shaidle have flown the coop, I implore the staff at Takimag to begin carrying the invaluable Israel Shamir.

    Shamir does not give nearly enough slobbering to WASP culture to be acceptable to Brimelow and Derbyshire.

    Read More
  26. Sam J. says:

    “…Yes, present diversity-driven overestimation of Blacks’ contribution to the American civilisation can be annoying, especially as it is supposed to provide cover for the exceedingly high rate of their incarceration. Deal with it…”

    That’s not the problem with Blacks and that’s not why they are in jail. They’re in jail for drugs, robbery, theft, assault, rape and murder. Even if we waive the drugs part there’s still robbery, theft, assault, rape and murder of which there’s plenty of that left. I don’t see any solution for that unless you don’t mind the present trend for ignoring Black crime and pleading it down.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    Quite so. The fairy tale is that Rufus and Donte are innocent, harmless waifs languishing in Supermax because of horrid prosecutors insane for hanging felonies on them for "a little weed." In reality, the drug offense was but one of the available charges and it's easier to get a plea on a drug count. Counts involving violence are, for one, hazardous for witnesses who fear retaliation.

    Mr. Shamir is mistaken in the extreme to advocate freeing scum. It is pandering to the unreasonable black sense of victimization when black criminality us the real issue.
  27. wayfarer says:

    More Deceptive False Flags Will Function to Accelerate a Deep State Engineered Pink Revolution, Within the U.S.

    Read More
  28. It seems like they are descending to a lunacy which can only have a bad ending. Since “professional” jews back the continued domination of the yankee imperium by zionist interests, including backing the barbarous Saudi regime and its mercenaries in other Middle Eastern countries, a possible blowback against those propagating these beliefs is likely to revivify anti-Semitic stereotypes buried by the Nazi regime. It is blatantly apparent in some commentaries about other articles on this website. While the Nazi regime and its policies were evil, I can understand this revivification, since the anti-Russian tenor of the neocon avatars of this approach seems to be an immediate threat to our survival.

    Other issues raised by the “pink revolution” including civil rights preferences for those choosing to have their dicks cut off as part of their identities, seems, I am sure, to be totally daft even to those reluctant to admit that fact due to the politically correct bullshit now in the air. I expect that the pink tide may eventually be met by actual resistance, and the police, looking the other way presently based on orders from the top, may soon rebel against these orders which go against their bullying traditions. I see a lot of possibilities of chaos.

    Read More
  29. fnn says:
    @Jake
    I know nothing about Shamir as Bolshevik apologist. I know he stresses the horrors the Nazis committed in Eastern Europe, which were ended only by advancing Soviet troops.

    I do know this: there are only two things that could cause decent, common sense folk to give a thought to post-Trotskyite Marxism (meaning, Marxism no longer focused on being a Jewish arm of genocide aimed at white cultures). 1 is resurgent and well armed Islam. The other is the EWASP-Jewish alliance.

    The British WASPs and now the AmericanWASPs have done both.

    I agree, the last person I was almost ready to kill was a pompous Englishman.

    But we have to remember the Soviets introduced their own horrors to Eastern Europe when they took it over:

    https://archive.org/details/TheAnti-humans

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zgoda_labour_camp

    A diligent researcher would no doubt find similar facilities in Hungary and the Baltic States.

    Read More
    • Troll: Cyrano
    • Replies: @fnn
    Review of The Anti-Humans:
    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/03/04/communism-in-romania-the-anti-humans-by-dumitru-bacu/
    , @Jake
    What does what Soviets did in the 20the century have to do with THE source of the Anglo-Zionist Empire?

    Nothing. In fact, to raise the Soviets is to play sleight of hand, which is necessary to keep people in the dark.

    Let's get at that this way: would the Soviet revolution, including the counter revolution against the Whites, have been successful without all that Jewish money from the Anglosphere?

    Not bloody likely. Rich Jews from the Anglosphere poured fortunes into toppling the Tsar and slaughtering his family and other hereditary nobles, as well as Orthodox and Catholic priests and monks. And they quickly used that same money to start slaughtering ordinary people who wre not Bolsheviks.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism being a Judaizing heresy that birthed the pro-Jewish WASP Elite was necessary to the Soviet Union being brought about.

    And remember: by the height of the Victorian, virtually 100% of the UK WASP Elites were rather strongly pro-Semitic, half to 2/3rds of them pro-Jewish and the rest pro-Arabic and pro-Islamic.

    You cannot separate the Jewish problem from the WASP problem. Not can you separate the Arabic (especially Saudi) problem from he WASP problem.
  30. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Racism is, fundamentally, about one thing:

    Whose kids do you want to inherit your place in this world? Your own kids? The kids of your brothers and sisters? The kids of all those of your own race, nation and civilization?

    Or do you want to hand your small patch of this earth, your home, the home of your people, the people of your own race and culture, to people of an alien race and culture?

    Read more

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    Or do you want to hand your small patch of this earth, your home, the home of your people, the people of your own race and culture, to people of an alien race and culture?
     
    Sounds reasonable enough, and I would agree that your "small" patch should be yours and your progeny's.

    The problem is the limitless Greed and Psychopathy of the white race, the real engine behind their intellectual momentum.

    In simple words, the problem is that they (you), truly live by this maxim;

    What is ours is ours, and what is theirs is also ours.

    You greedy psychopathic evil fuckers have defined a world order which ensures that, along with continuous unjust wars for hegemony.

    I understand that that system may be unravelling really slowly, but the evil white empire and its minions are not going to let go easily.

    Tens, or perhaps hundreds, more millions will perish, all for the greed and psychopathy of the accursed white man.

  31. fnn says:
    @fnn
    I agree, the last person I was almost ready to kill was a pompous Englishman.


    But we have to remember the Soviets introduced their own horrors to Eastern Europe when they took it over:
    https://archive.org/details/TheAnti-humans

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zgoda_labour_camp


    A diligent researcher would no doubt find similar facilities in Hungary and the Baltic States.

    Read More
  32. timamac says:

    All this anti Zionist , Israel, and Jewish talk is confusing. I get much of it, but also, I don’t get much of it. As a Christian, the Bible teaches that the Jews are God’s chosen people. I don’t why, it’s a mystery. I’m more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    The "Schofield" Bible falsely states that jews are God's "chosen people". Schoflield was a charlatan and hustler whose "interpretation" of the Bible is suspect.
    , @Maple Curtain
    It's not a mystery.

    Old Testament/Torah: God was revealed to the world through the Israelites. The Jewish Messiah is meant to establish an earthly kingdom over all other peoples.

    New Testament: Jesus came and declared that the Jews God was the God of all people (individuals) who came to him, etc. The Jewish leadership and most of the Jews rejected Jesus. God's kingdom is spiritual, not material.

    Jews nailed Jesus to a cross because they were, and are, ethnic supremacists who did not want to hear his message.

    Jews have always been at war with Christians. You don't realize that because you don't know the real teachings of the Church and have been taught by the sons of Satan in a thoroughly Jewed church.
    , @jacques sheete

    ...the Bible teaches that the Jews are God’s chosen people.
     
    Yeah, but that was contingent upon them acting civilized and obeying G-d, which they had trouble doing, repeatedly.

    They broke the "covenant" so they lost their chosen status, just like Adam and Eve got their tushies kicked outta the Garden for getting uppity.

    You would be well advised to read the NT and to pay particular attention to what JC himself said about those who wound up murdering him.

    , @jacques sheete
    About "choseness," this may help.

    Judaism: The "Chosen People"
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-quot-chosen-people-quot
     
    It would also no doubt help to turn off the teevee and all other corporate sources of information. It's worse than garbage for the most part. The only thing to do is to research the topic yourself, and the above link is a good start.
    , @schmenz
    You should also be concerned with those who have inflamed Muslim hatreds anew, and they would be the Zionist Jews and their poodle, the US government.

    Muslims, Christians and Jews lived together in relative peace for centuries in the Holy Land...until 1948. In 1948 the Zionist madmen decided to ethnically cleanse the Holy Land of any and all non-Jews and have been doing a bang-up job of that ever since. And the US supports that outrageous injustice.

    That is why we are hated by some - not all - Muslims. And the Zionists inflame that hatred every day by their actions toward the historic inhabitants of Palestine.
    , @anonymous

    I’m more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.
     
    That is because you subliminally understand that Islam is true monotheism, the only logical comprehension of the, One Infinite Unique Creator... and every other faith is fundamentally pagan polytheist human/animal worship.

    The deluded brainwashed part of your mind is trying to fight against that truth.

    Don't let it win. ;)

  33. fnn says:
    @Jake
    I know nothing about Shamir as Bolshevik apologist. I know he stresses the horrors the Nazis committed in Eastern Europe, which were ended only by advancing Soviet troops.

    I do know this: there are only two things that could cause decent, common sense folk to give a thought to post-Trotskyite Marxism (meaning, Marxism no longer focused on being a Jewish arm of genocide aimed at white cultures). 1 is resurgent and well armed Islam. The other is the EWASP-Jewish alliance.

    The British WASPs and now the AmericanWASPs have done both.

    I do know this: there are only two things that could cause decent, common sense folk to give a thought to post-Trotskyite Marxism (meaning, Marxism no longer focused on being a Jewish arm of genocide aimed at white cultures).

    Neo-Marxism (Marxism without the crackpot economics, originally a critical adaptation of classical economics) is more committed to genocide of white culture than ever. That should be obvious. It’s seen in its crudest forms with the “antifa” and the “white privilege” proselytizers. All the formerly Marxist organizations and parties of the West have adopted this “cultural Marxist” ideology, so the relationship is proven cladistically.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    Yes, indeed. They are all reading off that sheet of music. Merkel's origins are more powerful in her thinking than any realize. Similarly, westerners don't realize to what extent the West was and is saturated with communists. The hatefest against McCarthy and Diana West was due to their having struck a big, honking nerve. Same for Sobran on Jewish power.

    The destruction of the West now underway is inexplicable unless you understand the tremendous revulsion against the West in the hearts of a great many people. Multiculturalism is extolled as something positively wonderful just because it is but it is in fact vicious. It is satanic. Leftism is a revolt against order and decency and produces disorder and indecency. The West is about to enjoy what its traitors so ardently desire.
  34. @Robert Magill
    This article is an accurate indictment of forces at work in America that don't bode well for our future as a great power. So be it. We have never demonstrated an affinity for world leadership. The same tendencies that led to the schism the preceded our Civil War have risen again in global affairs. The materialism and cupidity that so rankled the South in 1861 became the m.o. of the victors and shape us today. This won't do. Eurasia has had enough and is turning away from US influence as rapidly as feasible considering the tendency for rabid violence we exhibit.

    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    “…forces at work in America that don’t bode well for our future as a great power.”

    Your choice of words is instructive about the type of brainwashing to which the American people have been subjected.

    You, an individual American, are not a great power, and neither you, nor 99.9% of Americans gain one thing positive from the projection of American military might around the world.

    Yet, you, and far too many other Americans have been brainwashed into believing that you gain some benefit, even if only psychological, from American might brutalizing the peoples of this earth.

    That makes you, and anyone else who has every sought psychological refuge in the pride of “our” being a great power, a dupe, a pawn.

    Time to snap out of it.

    n.b. I am not an American, but, lest anyone confuse my comment for an anti-American screed, I am very pro-American people, having found Americans to be the friendliest and most generous of spirit of all peoples, and especially unlike those in the smug heartless gulag to the north of you in which I reside.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Elsewhere
    Read his whole post before responding. You've misunderstood him completely.
  35. I would say, let them fight it out, and perhaps like the Kilkenny Cats, they will perform the friendly office until none is left.

    We should let them all fight it out, then make a decision, rather than playing Little Tin God and choosing sides before necessary.

    On the ground, you can with fight or run, but when you moralize you are lost. You then demand outcomes and will do anything to serve that idol, rather than follow the ground truth, natural law, to a desire outcome.

    Reveal religion demands commitment to this one or that one, based on a prior judgment, which is easily wrong, and demands that one play at being god, no matter the facts.

    Read More
  36. anarchyst says:
    @timamac
    All this anti Zionist , Israel, and Jewish talk is confusing. I get much of it, but also, I don't get much of it. As a Christian, the Bible teaches that the Jews are God's chosen people. I don't why, it's a mystery. I'm more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.

    The “Schofield” Bible falsely states that jews are God’s “chosen people”. Schoflield was a charlatan and hustler whose “interpretation” of the Bible is suspect.

    Read More
  37. @timamac
    All this anti Zionist , Israel, and Jewish talk is confusing. I get much of it, but also, I don't get much of it. As a Christian, the Bible teaches that the Jews are God's chosen people. I don't why, it's a mystery. I'm more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.

    It’s not a mystery.

    Old Testament/Torah: God was revealed to the world through the Israelites. The Jewish Messiah is meant to establish an earthly kingdom over all other peoples.

    New Testament: Jesus came and declared that the Jews God was the God of all people (individuals) who came to him, etc. The Jewish leadership and most of the Jews rejected Jesus. God’s kingdom is spiritual, not material.

    Jews nailed Jesus to a cross because they were, and are, ethnic supremacists who did not want to hear his message.

    Jews have always been at war with Christians. You don’t realize that because you don’t know the real teachings of the Church and have been taught by the sons of Satan in a thoroughly Jewed church.

    Read More
  38. RudyM says:

    It is quite unnecessary to antagonise Blacks. . . . They are not against you, they are not against whites, they are not even against white nationalists.

    How much time have you spent in the United States? As a collective blacks may not be against whites, but there is a large segment of the black population that is against whites; don’t kid yourself. Spend some time living in a US urban area with a large black population, and make sure you have contact with all segments of society.

    Read More
  39. RudyM says:

    Going on the attack against Zionism is good, but it won’t necessarily weaken the power of unjustified accusations of racism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Going on the attack against Zionism is good, but it won’t necessarily weaken the power of unjustified accusations of racism.
     
    Why not just accept that Jews, Zionist or otherwise, are racists.

    It's fundamental to their religion just as genocide is to their political armory, beginning with the Canaanites and now focused on the Europeans.

    And why not accept that Europeans are racists too.

    Why should they not be?

    Racism is about survival: survival of your clan versus the survival of some alien invader, or the indigenous population of the land you have occupied.

    Racism is a matter of basic human preference and is expressed in all societies where any semblance of real democracy exists.

    Anti-racism = anti-democracy and genocide.

    Which are you for? Survival of your own people and culture, or committing racial suicide the PC anti-racist way?

  40. Elsewhere says:
    @Maple Curtain
    "...forces at work in America that don’t bode well for our future as a great power."

    Your choice of words is instructive about the type of brainwashing to which the American people have been subjected.

    You, an individual American, are not a great power, and neither you, nor 99.9% of Americans gain one thing positive from the projection of American military might around the world.

    Yet, you, and far too many other Americans have been brainwashed into believing that you gain some benefit, even if only psychological, from American might brutalizing the peoples of this earth.

    That makes you, and anyone else who has every sought psychological refuge in the pride of "our" being a great power, a dupe, a pawn.

    Time to snap out of it.

    n.b. I am not an American, but, lest anyone confuse my comment for an anti-American screed, I am very pro-American people, having found Americans to be the friendliest and most generous of spirit of all peoples, and especially unlike those in the smug heartless gulag to the north of you in which I reside.

    Read his whole post before responding. You’ve misunderstood him completely.

    Read More
  41. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @RudyM
    Going on the attack against Zionism is good, but it won't necessarily weaken the power of unjustified accusations of racism.

    Going on the attack against Zionism is good, but it won’t necessarily weaken the power of unjustified accusations of racism.

    Why not just accept that Jews, Zionist or otherwise, are racists.

    It’s fundamental to their religion just as genocide is to their political armory, beginning with the Canaanites and now focused on the Europeans.

    And why not accept that Europeans are racists too.

    Why should they not be?

    Racism is about survival: survival of your clan versus the survival of some alien invader, or the indigenous population of the land you have occupied.

    Racism is a matter of basic human preference and is expressed in all societies where any semblance of real democracy exists.

    Anti-racism = anti-democracy and genocide.

    Which are you for? Survival of your own people and culture, or committing racial suicide the PC anti-racist way?

    Read More
    • Agree: Che Guava
    • Disagree: SolontoCroesus
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    Why not just accept that Jews, Zionist or otherwise, are racists.
     
    and

    Europeans are racists too.

    Racism is about survival: survival of your clan versus the survival of some alien invader, or the indigenous population of the land you have occupied.
     

    You can't call both situations racism.

    If Racism is about survival . . . of your clan versus the survival of some alien invader

    then

    Jews/Zionists are and always have been the "alien invader."

    Jews/Zionists also were established upon, maintain, and teach their children that Jews are inherently morally supreme, and being supreme, have the right to destroy the icons/cultures/ideas/art of other people.

    HERE is what Jews teach their children: the quotation below is from an online site that teaches young Jews how to interpret Rabbinic midrash:
    http://learn.conservativeyeshiva.org/introduction-to-rabbinic-midrash-1-lesson-1-avraham-and-the-idol-shop/


    as a child, [Abraham] began contemplating and thinking day and night, and wondered how a sphere could follow a fixed path without being directed. If so, who directed it? Surely it would be impossible for it to rotate on its own!
    Abraham did not have a mentor, but was immersed amongst the stupid idolaters of Ur Casdim, where everyone, including his mother and father, served idols, as did he.
    In his heart, however, he continued to contemplate, until he realized the way of truth and understood the ways of righteousness from nature, and knew that there is a God who directs the spheres, created the world, and besides whom there is none other.

    He also knew that the whole world was erring, and knew that what caused the mistake was that they [had] worshiped the stars and figures for so long that the truth had vanished.

    Abraham was forty years old when he recognized his Creator. Once he achieved this, he began to reason with the inhabitants of Ur Casdim and to argue with them, saying that by serving idols they were not following the way of truth. He broke their images, and began to proclaim that it is not fitting to serve anyone other than God, and to Him it is fitting to bow down and to offer drink sacrifices and sacrifices to, so that all creation will recognize Him.
    Abraham also proclaimed that it was fitting to break and destroy all the figures, so that nobody will err on account of them, like those who imagined that there is no God except for their idols did.
     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV2COCsedCw

    This superior morality of Jews is the reason for "antisemitism:" Jews are chosen by god to teach the rest of the world moral and ethical values, and most people resist the demand to behave as morally as the Jews.

    (nb. in the video, the bit about Hitler is bogus: it's based on a quotation from the bogus memoirs of Hermann Rauschning http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p499_weber.html So much for superior morality.)

    In other words, Jews/Zionists are "alien invaders" who seek to impose their "supremacist" ideology on other in the land of the other, while destroying the 'icons' of those native people.

    nb Christians maintain their roots in Abraham and practice similar supremacist behavior.
    I think followers of Jesus ought to separate themselves from "abrahamism" as Walter Grundmann attempted to do.

    , @RudyM
    People like you like to make sweeping generalizations about how human nature is racist, but the reality that I've observed is a lot more nuanced that what you claim. Many of us enjoy the company of at least some of those who are different than us. (Granted, the company of some others is more enjoyable than other others.)

    I can't justify ethnic cleansing, genocide, or other extreme measures toward the creation of an ethno-state. Controlling immigration, on the other hand, seems reasonable and justifiable.

    I don't think dreams of pure ethno-state should override historical responsibilities. Basically I don't believe might makes right. Your approach seems to assume that.

    (Anyway, I am not alt-right and probably not even necessarily on the right at all.)
  42. Che Guava says:
    @Huggbear
    Is it possible to be anti-Zionist without being anti-Semitic?

    I think they would because the term has very bad connotations now. It has morphed its original meaning, but the short answer is definitely YES although most Jews in California would not agree.

    Let’s try and understand :


    There is great confusion about what Zionism actually means and how it is defined and where the term arose from. To understand ANTI-ZIONISM it is good to understand a little history.

    HOW THE TERM AROSE

    Zion is a hill near Jerusalem (now in the city), widely symbolizing the Land of Israel. Zionism was nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land.

    WHY ZIONISM AROSE

    Since the first centuries CE, most Jews have lived outside the Land of Israel (Eretz Israel, better known as Palestine), although there has been a constant minority presence of Jews. According to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Eretz Israel was a land CONDITIONALLY promised to the Jews by God according to the Hebrew and Greek Bibles and the Quran, respectively but conditional upon righteous behaviour.

    The Diaspora began in 586 BCE during the Babylonian occupation of Israel. The Babylonians destroyed the First Temple took the Israelites back to Babylon, which was central to Jewish culture at the time and gave rise to their venerated “book” - The Babylonian Talmud.

    Many subsequently returned to Israel to rebuild the Temple when the Babylonian King died and set about rebuilding the Temple.

    After the 1st century Great Revolt and the 2nd century Bar Kokhba revolt , the Roman Empire expelled the Jews from Judea , changing the name to "Syria Palaestina".

    The Bar Kokhba revolt caused a spike in anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution. The ensuing exile from Judea greatly increased the percent of Jews who were dispersed throughout the Diaspora instead of living in their original home intermarrying with other races kept the numbers up along with the mass conversion of Khazaria to Judaism in the 8th Century. ( these “new” Jews subsequently populated the Polish hinterland known as “The Pale of the Settlement” and spoke Yiddish. They are the original Ashkenaz.

    In the 17th century Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676) announced himself as the Messiah and gained many Jews to his side, forming a base in Salonika. He first tried to establish a settlement in Gaza, but moved later to Smyrna. After deposing the old rabbi Aaron Lapapa in the spring of 1666, the Jewish community of Avignon France, prepared to emigrate to the new kingdom.

    The readiness of the Jews of the time to believe the messianic claims of Sabbatai Zevi may be largely explained by the desperate state of Central European Jewry in the mid-17th century. The bloody pogroms of Bohdan Khmelnytsky had wiped out one-third of the Jewish population and destroyed many centres of Jewish learning and communal life due to their association with Usurious practices and the Talmudic “Worldview” .

    Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in central and eastern Europe as a national revival movement, in reaction to anti-Semitic and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe.

    Soon after this most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired state in Palestine, then an area controlled by the Ottoman Empire.

    A religious variety of Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity defined as adherence to religious Judaism, opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies, and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be a majority nation in their own state.

    There are other varieties of Zionism. One called cultural Zionism was founded and represented most prominently by Ahad Ha'am, fostered a secular vision of a Jewish "spiritual centre" in Israel, this is to be contrasted with Political Zionism which was established with the political goal of creating a Jewish state in order to create a nation where Jews could be the majority, rather than the minority they were in the many nations in the diaspora.

    THE AUTHOR OF MODERN POLITICAL ZIONISM

    Theodor Herzl, is considered the ideological father of Zionism, considered Anti-Semitism as an eternal feature of all societies in which Jews lived as minorities, and that only a separation could allow Jews to escape eternal prosecution.

    "Let them give us sovereignty over a piece of of the Earth's surface, just sufficient for the needs of our people, then we will do the rest!" he proclaimed exposing his plan."

    Major aspects of the Zionist idea are represented in the Israeli Declaration of Independence :

    1.The Land of Israel was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped. Here they first attained to statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance and gave to the world the eternal Book of Books.

    2.After being forcibly exiled from their land, the people kept faith with it throughout their Dispersion and never ceased to pray and hope for their return to it and for the restoration in it of their political freedom.

    3.Impelled by this historic and traditional attachment, Jews strove in every successive generation to re-establish themselves in their ancient homeland. In recent decades they returned in their masses.

    Herzl came to reject his early ideas regarding Jewish emancipation and assimilation and to believe that the Jews must remove themselves from Europe and create their own state. Beginning in late 1895, Herzl wrote "Der Judenstaat" (The State of the Jews), which was published February 1896 to immediate acclaim and controversy.

    The book argued that the Jewish people should leave Europe if they wished to, either for Argentina or, preferably, for Palestine, their historic homeland. The Jews possessed a nationality; all they were missing was a nation and a state of their own.

    In "Der Judenstaat" he writes:

    "The Jewish question persists wherever Jews live in appreciable numbers. Wherever it does not exist, it is brought in together with Jewish immigrants. We are naturally drawn into those places where we are not persecuted, and our appearance there gives rise to persecution. This is the case, and will inevitably be so, everywhere, even in highly civilised countries—see, for instance, France—so long as the Jewish question is not solved on the political level."

    Only through a Jewish state could they avoid anti-Semitism, express their culture freely and practice their religion without hindrance.

    Herzl’s ideas spread rapidly throughout the Jewish world and attracted international attention. Supporters of existing Zionist movements, such as the Hovevei Zion, immediately allied themselves with him, but establishment Jewry vilified him and considered his ideas as a threat to their attempts at integration and a rebellion against God.

    The book concludes:

    "Therefore I believe that a wondrous generation of Jews will spring into existence. The Maccabeans will rise again. Let me repeat once more my opening words:

    The Jews who wish for a State will have it.We shall live at last as free men on our own soil, and die peacefully in our own homes.The world will be freed by our liberty, enriched by our wealth, magnified by our greatness. And whatever we attempt there to accomplish for our own welfare, will react powerfully and beneficially for the good of humanity"

    Herzl publicly met Wilhelm II in 1898. The meeting significantly advanced Herzl's and Zionism's legitimacy in Jewish and world opinion.

    Unlike Herzl, the founder of political Zionism, Ahad Ha'am strived for Israel to be "a Jewish state and not merely a state of Jews".

    ANTI-ZIONISM

    Advocates of Zionism view it as a national liberation movement for the repatriation of a persecuted people residing as minorities in a variety of nations, to the homeland to which they had a historical connection.

    Throughout the first decade of the Zionist movement, there were several instances where Zionist figures supported a Jewish state in places outside Palestine, such as Uganda and Argentina. Even Theodor Herzl, the founder of political Zionism was initially content with any Jewish self-governed state.

    However, other Zionists emphasized the memory, emotion and myth linking Jews to the Land of Israel and migrations began to Holy Land.

    Despite using Zion as the name of the movement (a name after the Jebusite fortress in Jerusalem, which became synonymous with Jerusalem), Palestine only became Herzl's main focus after his Zionist manifesto 'Judenstaat' was published in 1896, but even then he was hesitant.

    In 1903, British Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain offered Herzl 5,000 square miles in the Uganda Protectorate for Jewish settlement. Called the Uganda Scheme, it was introduced the same year to the World Zionist Organization's Congress at its sixth meeting, where a fierce debate ensued.

    It should also be noted that throughout the 1930s when MOST European countries were asking Jews to leave their countries not just Germany, there was a progressive exodus eastward through Germany where camps were built to house the mass migration on their way. Some of these later turned into the extermination camps of the Holocaust as Nazism began to oppose Zionism and, arguably, its progeny Communism / Bolshevism.

    In the early days both Hitler and the World Zionist organisation shared the same objective of populating Palestine with returning Jews. The agreement between Hitler and the Zionist movement was known as the Ha’avara Agreement. In other words most European countries wanted the Jews OUT and the reason for this is another long discussion but boils down to their “Worldview” fostered by the Babylonian Talmud and the focus on Usurious business practices. Europe, at that time, was principally Catholic and viewed USURY and SODOMY as category partners in immorality.

    More worrying is the discussion topic promoted by the Rothschild dynasty in the World Zionist Conference in the early 1900s that discuss Zionism becoming a World Dominant Ideology with NWO ambitions.

    Critics of Zionism view it as a colonialist,racist and exceptionalist ideology that led advocates to violence during Mandatory Palestine, followed by the forced exodus of Palestinians, and the subsequent denial of their human rights.

    Furthermore the Zionist Ashkenazi sect have NWO order aspirations and push their worldview through the Neo-Con movement that has taken Washington captive since 1991. They formulated the PNAC ( Plan for the New American Century) and leading policies like “Open Immigration” that destroy American and indeed Western Nations from within by using Muslims as the “tip of the spear” to destroy our inherited culture.

    When a “Group” that governs the political agenda of the USA - TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE USA - requires a very serious spotlight on them.New American Century (PNAC), which has essentially dictated Bush regime "defense" policies since early 2001:

    These PNACzi's. Credited with this incredible yet frightening nonsense are the following higher-ups in the current false US "presidential" regime: Paul Wolfowitz, then with the Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University I. Lewis Libby, then with the Wall Street firm of Dechert Price & Rhoads ... and the following well-known "neo-cons" and for the most part Zionists:

    1. Roger Barnett, U.S. Naval War College Alvin Bernstein, National Defense University
    2. Stephen Cambone, National Defense University
    3. Eliot Cohen, Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
    4. Devon Gaffney Cross, Donors' Forum for International Affairs
    5. Thomas Donnelly, Project for the New American Century
    6. David Epstein, Office of Secretary of Defense, Net Assessment
    7. David Fautua, Lt. Col., U.S. Army
    8. Dan Goure, Center for Strategic and International Studies
    9. Donald Kagan, Yale University
    10. Fred Kagan, U. S. Military Academy at West Point
    11. Robert Kagan, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
    12. Robert Killebrew, Col., USA (Ret.)
    13. William Kristol, The Weekly Standard
    14. Mark Lagon, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
    15. James Lasswell, GAMA Corporation Robert Martinage, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
    16. Phil Meilinger, U.S. Naval War College
    17. Mackubin Owens, U.S. Naval War College
    18. Steve Rosen, Harvard University
    19. Gary Schmitt, Project for the New American Century
    20. Abram Shulsky, The RAND Corporation
    21. Michael Vickers, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
    22. Barry Watts, Northrop Grumman Corporation
    23. Dov Zakheim, System Planning Corporation .

    If a particular group become a Power Elite and manage a country to the detriment of the Nationalist structures in a non patriotic way we are bound to ask Why? and what is the common link between them, namely, Zionism, for this is the Political Ideology that is confused with the “homeland” idea.

    Thus the new anti-Zionism and is being incorrectly equated with anti-Semitism emanates from the far-right, the political left, and a growing Muslim population within European nations. A statistical analysis shows that 150 million people across Europe have "serious anti-Semitic" or "demonic view of Israel" because of conflation of all Israelis with this poisenous ideology.

    Cooper, Abraham and Harold Brackman. "Hitler’s e-book blitzkrieg.(http://www.jewishjournal.com/cul...) *Jewish Journal*. 15 January 2014. 15 January 2014.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Zionism is a loaded term which can mean many different things as a consultation of Wikipedia will inform you. Generally, the Anti-Zionists will be those who oppose the territorial claims as set out in the Zionist agenda of 1919 and illustrated in the map at the top of this blog.

    The “homeland” of the Jews in a State that is pluralist within the geographic boundaries that comply partially with the conditionality of the “Abrahamic covenant”, the territorial gains by successive wars, the sanction of international Law, the support of the UN , the recognition of the Palestinians . These latter who numbered 1 million in 1948 compared with the Jews 300,000 in that land.

    Thus what we have is a complex and developing issue that could lead to Nuclear Wars and which is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon and certainly not under the current American Neo-con influences.

    Drain that Swamp and fast!

    Wow, your first and only post!

    Cheap that you are using a variation on an existing commenter’s u-name.

    Also funny how your attempted essay becomes totally disjointed before the list of early neo-cons, which from my reading is far from being representative or comprehensive, many on the iist just seem to be crypto-Zionists, not neo-cons as such.

    People forget that, on Einstein’s vaunted world tour, he was only Herzl’s puppy dog, or show pony. This may be particular to Japan.

    Read More
  43. “non-Jews meekly followed while Jews played them like a fiddle…It is quite unnecessary to antagonise Blacks. .. They are not against you, they are not against whites, they are not even against white nationalists. They are partly white, as a rule. I’ll start with Izzy S’s “black statement.” Pure degeneracy. Blacks are naturally antaganostic. They hate whites. Even if they have some white blood, they are still black. Does anyone recall a recent occupant of the White House who was 1/2 black and white? Does anyone recall his racialism? He never struck me as being pro-white.

    As for the non-Jews, here are the biggest supporters of the Jews: the RCC and Zioevangizers. Deal with these two groups and you solve your Jewish/Muslim/black/Asian/homosexual problems.

    Trump is doing the best he can given his circumstances. It is up to us to keep putting the pressure on the RCC and Zioevangizers.

    Read More
  44. @CanSpeccy

    Going on the attack against Zionism is good, but it won’t necessarily weaken the power of unjustified accusations of racism.
     
    Why not just accept that Jews, Zionist or otherwise, are racists.

    It's fundamental to their religion just as genocide is to their political armory, beginning with the Canaanites and now focused on the Europeans.

    And why not accept that Europeans are racists too.

    Why should they not be?

    Racism is about survival: survival of your clan versus the survival of some alien invader, or the indigenous population of the land you have occupied.

    Racism is a matter of basic human preference and is expressed in all societies where any semblance of real democracy exists.

    Anti-racism = anti-democracy and genocide.

    Which are you for? Survival of your own people and culture, or committing racial suicide the PC anti-racist way?

    Why not just accept that Jews, Zionist or otherwise, are racists.

    and

    Europeans are racists too.

    Racism is about survival: survival of your clan versus the survival of some alien invader, or the indigenous population of the land you have occupied.

    You can’t call both situations racism.

    If Racism is about survival . . . of your clan versus the survival of some alien invader

    then

    Jews/Zionists are and always have been the “alien invader.”

    Jews/Zionists also were established upon, maintain, and teach their children that Jews are inherently morally supreme, and being supreme, have the right to destroy the icons/cultures/ideas/art of other people.

    HERE is what Jews teach their children: the quotation below is from an online site that teaches young Jews how to interpret Rabbinic midrash:

    http://learn.conservativeyeshiva.org/introduction-to-rabbinic-midrash-1-lesson-1-avraham-and-the-idol-shop/

    as a child, [Abraham] began contemplating and thinking day and night, and wondered how a sphere could follow a fixed path without being directed. If so, who directed it? Surely it would be impossible for it to rotate on its own!
    Abraham did not have a mentor, but was immersed amongst the stupid idolaters of Ur Casdim, where everyone, including his mother and father, served idols, as did he.
    In his heart, however, he continued to contemplate, until he realized the way of truth and understood the ways of righteousness from nature, and knew that there is a God who directs the spheres, created the world, and besides whom there is none other.

    He also knew that the whole world was erring, and knew that what caused the mistake was that they [had] worshiped the stars and figures for so long that the truth had vanished.

    Abraham was forty years old when he recognized his Creator. Once he achieved this, he began to reason with the inhabitants of Ur Casdim and to argue with them, saying that by serving idols they were not following the way of truth. He broke their images, and began to proclaim that it is not fitting to serve anyone other than God, and to Him it is fitting to bow down and to offer drink sacrifices and sacrifices to, so that all creation will recognize Him.
    Abraham also proclaimed that it was fitting to break and destroy all the figures, so that nobody will err on account of them, like those who imagined that there is no God except for their idols did.

    This superior morality of Jews is the reason for “antisemitism:” Jews are chosen by god to teach the rest of the world moral and ethical values, and most people resist the demand to behave as morally as the Jews.

    (nb. in the video, the bit about Hitler is bogus: it’s based on a quotation from the bogus memoirs of Hermann Rauschning http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p499_weber.html So much for superior morality.)

    In other words, Jews/Zionists are “alien invaders” who seek to impose their “supremacist” ideology on other in the land of the other, while destroying the ‘icons’ of those native people.

    nb Christians maintain their roots in Abraham and practice similar supremacist behavior.
    I think followers of Jesus ought to separate themselves from “abrahamism” as Walter Grundmann attempted to do.

    Read More
  45. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    The leaders of the counter-culture riots of the late 1960′s were Jerry Rubin, Abbie Hoffman and Paul Krassner. Jewish rabble-rousers, but at least they had the guts to show their faces.

    Rubin’s comment, “It made me see we could build a movement by knocking off American symbols,” is being replayed today by the Antifa thugs, hiding behind masks, but most likely, the same anarchist DNA as their Yippie grandfathers.

    Antifa want to turn the USA into a carbon copy of Uncle Joe’s USSR, and if they have to butcher 50 million or so Americans, well, that’s the price of a Red Omelette.

    Read More
  46. “The area where you are located is under Jewish control. The entry of Arabs is absolutely forbidden and constitutes a mortal danger to you!” You couldn’t find such signs in the Deep South even in Jim Crow days!

    Don’t be ridiculous. Who would change the bedding if there were such signs?

    “Jim Crow” was not segregation. It was hierarchical integration. Southerners just loved them some Africans.

    Read More
  47. Issac says:

    I see no utility in Trump pivoting one way or the other with the Zionists or Diaspora. In-fact I think it’s clearly the case that his loyalties one way or the other are proscribed by circumstances outside his control. Jews in both camps have no loyalty to anyone outside our tribe and for this reason we will be exterminated when the whites are no longer powerful enough to project our moral authority into martial power.

    Read More
  48. @timamac
    All this anti Zionist , Israel, and Jewish talk is confusing. I get much of it, but also, I don't get much of it. As a Christian, the Bible teaches that the Jews are God's chosen people. I don't why, it's a mystery. I'm more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.

    …the Bible teaches that the Jews are God’s chosen people.

    Yeah, but that was contingent upon them acting civilized and obeying G-d, which they had trouble doing, repeatedly.

    They broke the “covenant” so they lost their chosen status, just like Adam and Eve got their tushies kicked outta the Garden for getting uppity.

    You would be well advised to read the NT and to pay particular attention to what JC himself said about those who wound up murdering him.

    Read More
  49. it is permitted for blacks and their advocates to point out blacks’ under-representation among the elite and over-representation among the…whatever the opposite of elite is. blacks should resent their situation.

    it is not permitted to point out the truly gross over-representation of jews in so many areas. mass media, finance and real estate finance/development are the worst.

    this over-representation is so extreme that the jewish IQ cannot even come close to explaining it.

    white gentiles have very good reason to resent this. yet it can never be spoken of.

    when jews regard white gentiles in the same way white gentiles regard blacks, when they believe their people score 1 SD higher on IQ tests and this because jews are genetically superior to white gentiles this is a disaster. it cannot end well. you can’t fool all the people all the time.

    Read More
  50. it can never be spoken of because abc, cbs, nbc, hbo, showtime, cnn, msnbc, movies, NPR…are all jewish owned, managed, and staffed.

    it’s colonization.

    Read More
  51. @timamac
    All this anti Zionist , Israel, and Jewish talk is confusing. I get much of it, but also, I don't get much of it. As a Christian, the Bible teaches that the Jews are God's chosen people. I don't why, it's a mystery. I'm more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.

    About “choseness,” this may help.

    Judaism: The “Chosen People”

    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-quot-chosen-people-quot

    It would also no doubt help to turn off the teevee and all other corporate sources of information. It’s worse than garbage for the most part. The only thing to do is to research the topic yourself, and the above link is a good start.

    Read More
  52. utu says:

    A real revolution in France 1789… a real revolution in Russia 1917

    Israel Shamir is incorrigible Bolshevik sentimentalist which is an oxymoron because the Bolsheviks were ruthless and calculating killers. The two revolutions he mentions are more real than others only because their impact was global and they killed more people than any other revolution since. But in terms of them being real, meaning spontaneous and genuine Shamir is mistaken. All revolution are orchestrated and need lots of money. Revolution usually happen when things are getting better than worse for the general populace. Lot’s of money was spent by people who had money to make the Bolshevik revolution come true. Organizer came from abroad with bags of money. Government was infiltrated by dupes and useful idiots who helped the revolution. Workers in St. Petersburg were paid to strike just like Maidan occupiers in 2014 in Kiev. It is harder to track the money flow in case of French Revolution but the methods were not different. Just think about the bonnet rouge (Phrygian cap). Some textile mills made good money producing the fabric for the caps and somebody paid for it all in advance.

    There is nothing easier than to make people to revolt. It is much harder to make them calm down.

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    All revolution are orchestrated and need lots of money.
     
    And they get romanticized as some sort of deliverance for the masses. In any case, the violent ones burn themselves out rapidly and consistently and invariably get co-opted by the usual suspects.

    Many idealists found out the hard way and after it was too late that the various Red revolutions of any significance were backed by big money at least until the dupes did the dirty work, then they had the rug pulled out from under them.

    One can even see the concept playing out in the American rev if he loses the mythology and studies the realities of it.


    "Dee-Lighted!" by Robert Minor in St. Louis Post-Dispatch (1911).

    Karl Marx surrounded by an appreciative audience of Wall Street financiers: John D. Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, John D. Ryan of National City Bank, and Morgan partner George W. Perkins.

    Immediately behind Karl Marx is Teddy Roosevelt, leader of the Progressive Party.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Robert-Minor-Dee-Lighted-1911.png

     

    (Note: This comment was made for general educational purposes and to amplify utu's comment since his was excellent and he no doubt realizes it all already.)
  53. nickels says:

    At some point the crowd has to gather in Washington DC for the final mob scene of the color revolution.
    Here’s how to defeat it.
    Pull the police back.
    Infect the food supply with the worst case of Montezuma’s revenge around.
    Pull every porta potty out of there.
    Don’t let anyone leave for a week.
    Also, as a nice touch, storm the sound system and crank Lee Greenwood’s ‘Proud To Be An American’ nonstop.

    Read More
  54. schmenz says:
    @timamac
    All this anti Zionist , Israel, and Jewish talk is confusing. I get much of it, but also, I don't get much of it. As a Christian, the Bible teaches that the Jews are God's chosen people. I don't why, it's a mystery. I'm more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.

    You should also be concerned with those who have inflamed Muslim hatreds anew, and they would be the Zionist Jews and their poodle, the US government.

    Muslims, Christians and Jews lived together in relative peace for centuries in the Holy Land…until 1948. In 1948 the Zionist madmen decided to ethnically cleanse the Holy Land of any and all non-Jews and have been doing a bang-up job of that ever since. And the US supports that outrageous injustice.

    That is why we are hated by some – not all – Muslims. And the Zionists inflame that hatred every day by their actions toward the historic inhabitants of Palestine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Actually Islam and Judaism have much in common. Each "faith" professes an almost identical form of supremacism with punishments for transgressions against non-believers much less severe than those committed by non-believers against those of the "chosen"--both moslem and jew. One could safely argue that Islam is an arabicized form of Judaism. Both Islam and Judaism believe in Gods of vengeance, unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption.
    Read the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran to see for yourself.
    One divergence from similarity is the way Jesus Christ is looked upon...Jews consider Jesus Christ a heretic that is "boiling in excrement for eternity", conceived by his mother Mary, who is looked upon as a harlot, who consorted with a Roman soldier.
    Contrast that with the Islamic Koran, which regards, Jesus Christ as a great prophet...not the "Son of God", but a great prophet nevertheless. His mother Mary is specifically mentioned in the Koran and is given a place of high honor.
    Now, which "belief system" is more hostile to Christianity?
    }
  55. RudyM says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Going on the attack against Zionism is good, but it won’t necessarily weaken the power of unjustified accusations of racism.
     
    Why not just accept that Jews, Zionist or otherwise, are racists.

    It's fundamental to their religion just as genocide is to their political armory, beginning with the Canaanites and now focused on the Europeans.

    And why not accept that Europeans are racists too.

    Why should they not be?

    Racism is about survival: survival of your clan versus the survival of some alien invader, or the indigenous population of the land you have occupied.

    Racism is a matter of basic human preference and is expressed in all societies where any semblance of real democracy exists.

    Anti-racism = anti-democracy and genocide.

    Which are you for? Survival of your own people and culture, or committing racial suicide the PC anti-racist way?

    People like you like to make sweeping generalizations about how human nature is racist, but the reality that I’ve observed is a lot more nuanced that what you claim. Many of us enjoy the company of at least some of those who are different than us. (Granted, the company of some others is more enjoyable than other others.)

    I can’t justify ethnic cleansing, genocide, or other extreme measures toward the creation of an ethno-state. Controlling immigration, on the other hand, seems reasonable and justifiable.

    I don’t think dreams of pure ethno-state should override historical responsibilities. Basically I don’t believe might makes right. Your approach seems to assume that.

    (Anyway, I am not alt-right and probably not even necessarily on the right at all.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Many of us enjoy the company of at least some of those who are different than us.
     
    You make the common, foolish because unwarranted, assumption, that because I seek the preservation and perpetuation of my own family, my own kith and kin, my own nation and culture, over all others, I must hate other people, which is absurd. I live in a multi-racial society and have friends, people I like, people I care for, people I respect, and people I would sacrifice for, of all races, religions and creeds.

    But that doesn't mean I'd sacrifice my family for yours. I wouldn't. And if you'd sacrifice your family and their posterity to make way for a bunch of people of an alien race and culture, I would say that you are a poorly adapted specimen of humanity, and that the prospects of your kind in future generations are limited.

    But then I may be wrong. Perhaps, in the future, the only ordinary folk that the elite will tolerate are the stooges and sheeple, domesticated animals that can be readily programmed according to the current precepts of the religion of Political Correctness. In which case, you're well suited to the Brave New, post-1984 World. Congratulations on opting to be a traitor to your own race and nation.

  56. @utu
    A real revolution in France 1789... a real revolution in Russia 1917

    Israel Shamir is incorrigible Bolshevik sentimentalist which is an oxymoron because the Bolsheviks were ruthless and calculating killers. The two revolutions he mentions are more real than others only because their impact was global and they killed more people than any other revolution since. But in terms of them being real, meaning spontaneous and genuine Shamir is mistaken. All revolution are orchestrated and need lots of money. Revolution usually happen when things are getting better than worse for the general populace. Lot's of money was spent by people who had money to make the Bolshevik revolution come true. Organizer came from abroad with bags of money. Government was infiltrated by dupes and useful idiots who helped the revolution. Workers in St. Petersburg were paid to strike just like Maidan occupiers in 2014 in Kiev. It is harder to track the money flow in case of French Revolution but the methods were not different. Just think about the bonnet rouge (Phrygian cap). Some textile mills made good money producing the fabric for the caps and somebody paid for it all in advance.

    There is nothing easier than to make people to revolt. It is much harder to make them calm down.

    All revolution are orchestrated and need lots of money.

    And they get romanticized as some sort of deliverance for the masses. In any case, the violent ones burn themselves out rapidly and consistently and invariably get co-opted by the usual suspects.

    Many idealists found out the hard way and after it was too late that the various Red revolutions of any significance were backed by big money at least until the dupes did the dirty work, then they had the rug pulled out from under them.

    One can even see the concept playing out in the American rev if he loses the mythology and studies the realities of it.

    “Dee-Lighted!” by Robert Minor in St. Louis Post-Dispatch (1911).

    Karl Marx surrounded by an appreciative audience of Wall Street financiers: John D. Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, John D. Ryan of National City Bank, and Morgan partner George W. Perkins.

    Immediately behind Karl Marx is Teddy Roosevelt, leader of the Progressive Party.

    (Note: This comment was made for general educational purposes and to amplify utu’s comment since his was excellent and he no doubt realizes it all already.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @schrub
    Huh? Didn't Marx die in 1883. Maybe his ghost was in this picture.
  57. Art says:

    The modern word for Golem is Matrix.

    ma·trix : something (as a mold) that gives form, foundation, or origin to something else enclosed in it.

    We each are enclosed in the matrix of our culture. As a practical matter, we used to treat each other with a healthy respect as neighbors – today the Jews have us hating each other. Today we are starting to kill each other over politics.

    The US, Canada, UK, and Australia all live in a Jew Matrix. The Jews in these countries have managed to give form and foundation to these countries cultures. The Jews have molded and enclosed us in their evil Matrix. They dictate, the foundation, form, and origin of our next actions as a nation. They are falsely claiming that their values are American values.

    We are not free to be ourselves. The American matrix is dead – the Jew matrix rules.

    We all dance to a Jew Matrix toon – what could be more true?

    Think Peace — Art

    Read More
  58. @Fran Macadam
    The truth of the matter is that there were for a long time, right into the mid twentieth century, Sundown Towns. These had posted signs barring non-whites from being within the city limits after dark. A number of them were even in Oregon, which explicitly barred them from residency. So there is some equivalence with the modern Settler signs.

    @ Fran Macadam:

    Israel’s treatment of non-Jews is far worse than anything that ever happened to blacks under Jim Crow, or even slavery, in North America. Blacks in the South were never napalmed, their neighborhoods have never been attacked by military aircraft or shelled and attacked by tanks or infantry. Blacks have never faced all out war, or anything close to it, and there was never an attempt or real desire to genocide them.

    Read More
  59. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @RudyM
    People like you like to make sweeping generalizations about how human nature is racist, but the reality that I've observed is a lot more nuanced that what you claim. Many of us enjoy the company of at least some of those who are different than us. (Granted, the company of some others is more enjoyable than other others.)

    I can't justify ethnic cleansing, genocide, or other extreme measures toward the creation of an ethno-state. Controlling immigration, on the other hand, seems reasonable and justifiable.

    I don't think dreams of pure ethno-state should override historical responsibilities. Basically I don't believe might makes right. Your approach seems to assume that.

    (Anyway, I am not alt-right and probably not even necessarily on the right at all.)

    Many of us enjoy the company of at least some of those who are different than us.

    You make the common, foolish because unwarranted, assumption, that because I seek the preservation and perpetuation of my own family, my own kith and kin, my own nation and culture, over all others, I must hate other people, which is absurd. I live in a multi-racial society and have friends, people I like, people I care for, people I respect, and people I would sacrifice for, of all races, religions and creeds.

    But that doesn’t mean I’d sacrifice my family for yours. I wouldn’t. And if you’d sacrifice your family and their posterity to make way for a bunch of people of an alien race and culture, I would say that you are a poorly adapted specimen of humanity, and that the prospects of your kind in future generations are limited.

    But then I may be wrong. Perhaps, in the future, the only ordinary folk that the elite will tolerate are the stooges and sheeple, domesticated animals that can be readily programmed according to the current precepts of the religion of Political Correctness. In which case, you’re well suited to the Brave New, post-1984 World. Congratulations on opting to be a traitor to your own race and nation.

    Read More
  60. I’m not sure why many non-Jews (not just whites) should like Jewish culture, institutions, power, or even many individual Jews. For the most part, if a non-Jew isn’t an anti-Semite, he’s either just plain stupid, or not thinking. There’s nothing at all wrong in disliking Jewish culture, Jewish power, Jewish institutions, Judaism, or the Jewish collective. What is there to like in any of those for a Gentile?

    I don’t really see much difference in Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews. Both groups are extremely tribal, and have a strong drive to control others. I even doubt that many of the anti-Zionist or “universalist” Jews would really do anything that would harm Israel. They may not wish to live in Israel, for obvious reasons, but if push ever comes to shove, and Israel is truly in danger, I’m sure most would reveal their true tribal loyalties by ditching the Palestinians. For the most part they use Palestinian and Arab “allies” in the West as just another ethnic group to play against Whitey, anyway, leaving their interfaith partners looking like shuffling Sambos. I even wonder if the differences between Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews aren’t mostly fake. Bolsheviks in the diaspora and Nazis in the Promised Land. Tribal always.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Parbes
    Great comment, very perceptive, bravo! I agree completely.
    , @utu
    For the most part, if a non-Jew isn’t an anti-Semite, he’s either just plain stupid, or not thinking.

    Probably anything short of admiration and reverence comes as anti-Semitism nowadays but it would suffice to be aware of their otherness in terms of their group interests as they practice it which would be a simple application of one version of the Golden Rule like: what's good for the goose...
    , @fnn
    The pro-Palestinian movement in the US and UK (but really only the US counts) is controlled by liberal so-called anti-Zionist Jewish gatekeepers. This may be the reason it never seems to make any progress.

    Relevant video:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB2lDJJr3lE
  61. @Wally
    Such places in the US no longer exist.

    In "that shitty little country" they most certainly do, and much worse.

    Get serious, hasbarist.

    That’s as dumb, and factually deficient, as insulting everyone you disagree with as a Nazi.

    He don’t know me vewwy well, do he?

    Read More
  62. The fact of the matter is, there are areas of Miami Florida I personally am familiar with, where it’s not safe to be walking while black, after dark. They are largely Cuban emigre neighborhoods, not majority Anglo.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    Blacks pretty much roam about freely in America without any issues. When they do have issues, it's usually in hispanic neighborhoods. White areas are pretty much open to anyone, hut it's whites who face no-go zones throughout the nation. Most intra-racial violence and crime is perpetrated against whites by minorities, mostly black minorities.
  63. schrub says:
    @jacques sheete

    All revolution are orchestrated and need lots of money.
     
    And they get romanticized as some sort of deliverance for the masses. In any case, the violent ones burn themselves out rapidly and consistently and invariably get co-opted by the usual suspects.

    Many idealists found out the hard way and after it was too late that the various Red revolutions of any significance were backed by big money at least until the dupes did the dirty work, then they had the rug pulled out from under them.

    One can even see the concept playing out in the American rev if he loses the mythology and studies the realities of it.


    "Dee-Lighted!" by Robert Minor in St. Louis Post-Dispatch (1911).

    Karl Marx surrounded by an appreciative audience of Wall Street financiers: John D. Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, John D. Ryan of National City Bank, and Morgan partner George W. Perkins.

    Immediately behind Karl Marx is Teddy Roosevelt, leader of the Progressive Party.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Robert-Minor-Dee-Lighted-1911.png

     

    (Note: This comment was made for general educational purposes and to amplify utu's comment since his was excellent and he no doubt realizes it all already.)

    Huh? Didn’t Marx die in 1883. Maybe his ghost was in this picture.

    Read More
  64. Parbes says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    I'm not sure why many non-Jews (not just whites) should like Jewish culture, institutions, power, or even many individual Jews. For the most part, if a non-Jew isn't an anti-Semite, he's either just plain stupid, or not thinking. There's nothing at all wrong in disliking Jewish culture, Jewish power, Jewish institutions, Judaism, or the Jewish collective. What is there to like in any of those for a Gentile?

    I don't really see much difference in Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews. Both groups are extremely tribal, and have a strong drive to control others. I even doubt that many of the anti-Zionist or "universalist" Jews would really do anything that would harm Israel. They may not wish to live in Israel, for obvious reasons, but if push ever comes to shove, and Israel is truly in danger, I'm sure most would reveal their true tribal loyalties by ditching the Palestinians. For the most part they use Palestinian and Arab "allies" in the West as just another ethnic group to play against Whitey, anyway, leaving their interfaith partners looking like shuffling Sambos. I even wonder if the differences between Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews aren't mostly fake. Bolsheviks in the diaspora and Nazis in the Promised Land. Tribal always.

    Great comment, very perceptive, bravo! I agree completely.

    Read More
  65. Che Guava says:

    Judaeo-Christian is a nonsense term, as used now.

    The original usage was C19, by theologians. It did not mean anything like its modern usage.

    It meant the pre-Pauline tendency for Jewish ritual law to be applied, and the groups in the early Church who were favouring that.

    Looking at Catholic teaching since Vatican II, the judaics had made a big comeback, mainly through slow infiltration of the hierarchy. Like worms, they seem to be vanishingly few again now, but they were in the right places at the right times there.

    There is no such thing as ‘Judaeo-Christianity’. Post-dark-ages Western civ. and its offshoots would better be characterized as Greco-Roman-Germanic–Celtic Christian. The Iberians joining on the RC side, once they had thrown off their Islamic and Jewish oppressors.

    The fact of that is always neglected in why Iberians sailed to the west, as soon as they were free of the Islamo-Judaic yoke.

    Not that I mean to devalue the Orthodox, if I am to becoming to regularly attending Holy Mass again, I am thinking Orthodox is the most true.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Before you give up on the Catholic Church, please look into the Society of St Pius X (SSPX). I agree with you that the Vatican II Ecumenical Council was a grave error...
    The “beginning of the end” of Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants.
    Much Catholic ritual was discarded, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their "dirty work" for them...
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Cardinal Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back" against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial
    considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize celebration of pre-Vatican II principles.
  66. Thoot says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Hegemonists have their own storm troops – Antifa. This extremist movement was born in Germany. There they walk on the streets on the anniversary of Dresden bombings with Israeli flags and chant: “Death to Germany! Long live Bomber Harris” (the British commander of the Air Force, a big fan of the carpet bombing of Germany). They managed to terrorize the Germans: as soon as someone objects they call their opponent a Nazi and beat him up. And if they encounter resistance, the police comes to the rescue.
     
    Does this really happen, Israel??

    dear god where does it end.

    The Confederacy lost the war they launched on the US. Even Robert E Lee himself counseled that putting up statues to Confederates was ill-advised and would only serve to keep the tensions of war alive. It’s the United States, not the Union-Confederate States. For what possible reason should there be statues honoring those who waged war on the US?

    The reason is based in the fact that most of the statues were put up during the Jim Crow era as a way to emphasize that “we lost the war but we still advocate oppression of non-whites.” That aim was made clear in much of the rhetoric around their construction.

    I’d guess that at least 50% of the people defending the statues know little of how/why they were put up. But whether one loathes antifa or not – the fact that a bunch of neo-Nazis and other white supremacists are defending the statues makes it clear what they represent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    I don't know exactly which statue(s) you mean, but many statues honoring the Confederacy were erected in the early 1900s by the Daughters of the Confederacy, at pretty much the same time that Teddy Roosevelt told Booker T. Washington to take a hike. After the destruction of the War and Reconstruction, and the continued struggles of the region, it makes sense that the Lost Cause mythology would take root.

    Maybe among the elites of the South the movement was an attempt to regain lost power, but for the majority of Southerners who had always been treated like serfs by the gentry, and whose Confederate ancestors never owned slaves, the commemoration of the Confederacy has always served the purpose of honoring their own ancestors, and was/is an expression of their desire to be free of their masters from the North, who never did much good for them. Calling these people neo-Nazis or white supremacists is just stupid. National Socialism is not an American or Southern ideology or movement, and if current levels of voluntary segregation are an indication of white supremacy, then the Good Whites, Jews and SJWs of other hues in the North are the true racial supremacists.
  67. anarchyst says:
    @Che Guava
    Judaeo-Christian is a nonsense term, as used now.

    The original usage was C19, by theologians. It did not mean anything like its modern usage.

    It meant the pre-Pauline tendency for Jewish ritual law to be applied, and the groups in the early Church who were favouring that.

    Looking at Catholic teaching since Vatican II, the judaics had made a big comeback, mainly through slow infiltration of the hierarchy. Like worms, they seem to be vanishingly few again now, but they were in the right places at the right times there.

    There is no such thing as 'Judaeo-Christianity'. Post-dark-ages Western civ. and its offshoots would better be characterized as Greco-Roman-Germanic--Celtic Christian. The Iberians joining on the RC side, once they had thrown off their Islamic and Jewish oppressors.

    The fact of that is always neglected in why Iberians sailed to the west, as soon as they were free of the Islamo-Judaic yoke.

    Not that I mean to devalue the Orthodox, if I am to becoming to regularly attending Holy Mass again, I am thinking Orthodox is the most true.

    Before you give up on the Catholic Church, please look into the Society of St Pius X (SSPX). I agree with you that the Vatican II Ecumenical Council was a grave error…
    The “beginning of the end” of Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants.
    Much Catholic ritual was discarded, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their “dirty work” for them…
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Cardinal Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back” against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial
    considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize celebration of pre-Vatican II principles.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Thank you.

    I know of the Society of Saint Pius the Tenth, and the writing of Pope Pious X agaiinst theological modernism is very good, prophetic beyond theology. Posting a link if you don't know.

    Used to live near their HQ in Tokyo. They don't seem to hold Mass anywhere. Well, very occasionally. Maybe.

    I complain about the lack of latin at Mass, my friend very sensibly replies 'Nobody is undestanding it. '
    , @Huggbear
    As an Anglican Christian I was brought up never to understand the Catholics. In my latter years I have come to understand what a vast repository of "ideals" and "intellectual chiseling" the Catholic Church has undergone over the centuries and how "right" it is on many of the ideals.

    Can I say how much I enjoyed your ditty which summarised exactly my present feelings and even explained the reason for celibacy.

    Everywhere it seems, Rome is no exception, we see the clash of the ideals of Jesus ( PBUH) and the those rather nasty Jewish Pharisees. Whether Church or Geopolitics the Power of Mammon and its nefarious influences subverting and perverting.

    Can Catholicism ever recover from Vatican 11 ?

    Not it would seem without a major Revolution - that is never going to happen with this Pope .
  68. anarchyst says:
    @schmenz
    You should also be concerned with those who have inflamed Muslim hatreds anew, and they would be the Zionist Jews and their poodle, the US government.

    Muslims, Christians and Jews lived together in relative peace for centuries in the Holy Land...until 1948. In 1948 the Zionist madmen decided to ethnically cleanse the Holy Land of any and all non-Jews and have been doing a bang-up job of that ever since. And the US supports that outrageous injustice.

    That is why we are hated by some - not all - Muslims. And the Zionists inflame that hatred every day by their actions toward the historic inhabitants of Palestine.

    Actually Islam and Judaism have much in common. Each “faith” professes an almost identical form of supremacism with punishments for transgressions against non-believers much less severe than those committed by non-believers against those of the “chosen”–both moslem and jew. One could safely argue that Islam is an arabicized form of Judaism. Both Islam and Judaism believe in Gods of vengeance, unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption.
    Read the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran to see for yourself.
    One divergence from similarity is the way Jesus Christ is looked upon…Jews consider Jesus Christ a heretic that is “boiling in excrement for eternity”, conceived by his mother Mary, who is looked upon as a harlot, who consorted with a Roman soldier.
    Contrast that with the Islamic Koran, which regards, Jesus Christ as a great prophet…not the “Son of God”, but a great prophet nevertheless. His mother Mary is specifically mentioned in the Koran and is given a place of high honor.
    Now, which “belief system” is more hostile to Christianity?
    }

    Read More
    • Replies: @schmenz
    Regarding the similarities of Jews and Muslims, Hilaire Belloc was pointing that out in his day. Islam essentially selected what it liked from Catholicism and Judaism and concocted a new religion, disregarding what it didn't like in those two religions.

    But I agree that the real danger to the world is not Islam as such; the real danger comes from those who have a visceral hatred for Christianity, examples of which from their diseased Talmud you pointed out.
    , @Sowhat
    Everything the Jewish propaganda in the U.S. accuses of Islam, their religion is guilty of. Just visit radioislam.com and read for yourself. The Proles are played like a violin and, to read their idiotic comments is a sad indictment of just how foolish the average uneducated yo-yo truly is.
    , @anonymous
    The racial supremacy as believed by the Jews, and whites in general, is completely antithetical to Islam.

    But yes, as far as spiritual ideology goes, that of Islam's true monotheism, you are right, we believe it to be supreme... the only faith which comprehends his Oneness, Infiniteness and Uniqueness, a faith open to one and all, and the only faith acceptable to Him.

    With regards to the latter part of that statement, consider this;

    And those who believe [in true monotheism] and do righteous good deeds, they are dwellers of paradise, they will dwell therein forever. [Quran 2:82]

    Note, there is no mention about any prophets, or belief in any human, in that verse, except for a belief that He is One, and the "righteous good deeds," should be clear enough.

    Any human, from the time of Adam(pbuh), to the present day man, has always been mentally capable of comprehending and following it, if he only chose to.

    Compare that with the hoops Christians have to jump through, such as the nonsensical "Harrowing of Hell," to explain that salvation is only through Jesus(pbuh). Dug yourselves into a big hole there, fellas.

    Both Islam ... believe in Gods of vengeance
     
    In the Quran, the word "forgiveness" appears at least twice as much as "punishment." Ponder the implication of that.

    unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption
     
    Seriously, a westerner talking about peace? An irony so bitter. *sobs*

    Anyway, you are absolutely right about the Messiah and his mother. When we remember them, it is only with immense love and respect (may the peace and blessing of God be upon them).
  69. hyperbola says:
    @jilles dykstra
    As the Dutch beeldenstorm, at the beginning of our 80 year struggle with Spain shows, destroying of statues and monuments not necessarily has anything to to with colour.
    It may be that Dutch whites are a bit whiter than Spanish whites, but that is all.

    The destruction by mobs, protestant, of statues in catholic churches was the result of a fatal decision, Karel V, who resided in Brussels, and ruled the present Netherlands, Belgium and the present Spain, sent his son Philips II to Madrid to be eucated.
    Karel knew that he ruled a multi cultural empire, where wealth was produced in the tolerant north.
    Businessmen are no interested in religion or culture, they are interested in business, profitable business.

    Philips was educated by catholic clergy in a feudal society, the north, in the view of the Spanish clergy was an immoral rabble.
    And so, from Madrid, Philips hardly ever visited his northern realm, difficult to get there, a hostile France was in between, tried to convert the rabble to his standards.
    He failed, the small Holland, through cunning and luck, was able to play off the powers, France, England, Spain and the Ottoman empire, against each other.

    Spanish troops did not help, they increased the hatred of the north against the south.
    Dutch floods, frozen lakes, marshes, the flooding of low lying land, well fortified cities with a determined population after Spanish troops had massacred the Antwerp population did not make the task easy for troops used to Spanish conditions.
    Dutch coastal waters with ebb and flood movements prevent big Spanish warships to use their firing power.
    In this struggle the symbols of the hated catholic Spaniards, statues, beelden, were stormed, and hacked to pieces.
    Great pity, from an art perspective.

    What the outcome of the present USA Cold Civil War will be, right now is uncertain.
    Sure is to me that in hundred years from now the effort to destroy an important part of USA history will be regretted, but alas common sense never ruled the world.

    Maybe you are aware that many Spanish think being lackeys of the (imported from the “north”) Hapsburg “royals” during that period was a disaster for Spain? They inherited Carlos II (Karel II) from the Hapsberg Netherlands and are not at all bothered by the fact that the Spanish branch of the House of Hapsberg became extinct.

    Read More
  70. anarchyst says:

    I have a technical question:
    How can I post a picture?
    Thanks for your help…

    Read More
  71. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @CanSpeccy
    Racism is, fundamentally, about one thing:

    Whose kids do you want to inherit your place in this world? Your own kids? The kids of your brothers and sisters? The kids of all those of your own race, nation and civilization?

    Or do you want to hand your small patch of this earth, your home, the home of your people, the people of your own race and culture, to people of an alien race and culture?

    Read more

    Or do you want to hand your small patch of this earth, your home, the home of your people, the people of your own race and culture, to people of an alien race and culture?

    Sounds reasonable enough, and I would agree that your “small” patch should be yours and your progeny’s.

    The problem is the limitless Greed and Psychopathy of the white race, the real engine behind their intellectual momentum.

    In simple words, the problem is that they (you), truly live by this maxim;

    What is ours is ours, and what is theirs is also ours.

    You greedy psychopathic evil fuckers have defined a world order which ensures that, along with continuous unjust wars for hegemony.

    I understand that that system may be unravelling really slowly, but the evil white empire and its minions are not going to let go easily.

    Tens, or perhaps hundreds, more millions will perish, all for the greed and psychopathy of the accursed white man.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    You're saying that the "accursed white man" is genociding himself by suppressed reproduction and mass replacement immigration and thus deserves to die?

    You sound like a settler immigrant to the European world, and a cheerful participant in white genocide, although I suppose you may simply be a mouthpiece for the Money Power, or a dupe of the Politically Correct meme that the only good white is a self-hating white.

    As for wars for global empire, they are driven by the olive skinned as much as by whites,* although there are plenty of blacks, browns and yellows anxious to join the globalist elite, which will gladly accept them provided that they have acquired by any means the necessary billions to justify their claim to elite membership.

    In the world the globalists seek to create, humanity will be divided not between white and black, brown and yellow, but between sheep and goats, rulers and ruled.

    ——
    *Lord Rothschild was the executor of the will of the globalist empire builder, Cecil Rhodes, and the secret society for global empire** that Rhodes conceived was intended to organize elites throughout the Empire, the majority of whose citizens were not white.

    ** Rhodes Secret Society gave rise to the Council on Foreign Relations, of which nearly all US Presidents have belonged, though not J.F. Kennedy or Donald J. Trump, although Trump's national security advisor, Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster, is a CFR member.
    , @utu
    the greed and psychopathy of the accursed white man

    White men sooner or later will have to respond to people like you. White man does not have racial identity. He is really not self-aware that he is white. He defines himself by what he does. When he wakes up in the morning and sees his face in the mirror he does not see himself as white. On the other hand a black man has no other identity than the negation of being white because he can't define himself by accomplishment which are too few but only by resentment. If people like you force on white man racial identity it will be a very sad moment for civilization and it will be very bad for people like you because then the white man will be just like you, full of resentment and irrational with the advantage of having brains and wits. Fear the white man when he awakens.
  72. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @timamac
    All this anti Zionist , Israel, and Jewish talk is confusing. I get much of it, but also, I don't get much of it. As a Christian, the Bible teaches that the Jews are God's chosen people. I don't why, it's a mystery. I'm more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.

    I’m more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.

    That is because you subliminally understand that Islam is true monotheism, the only logical comprehension of the, One Infinite Unique Creator… and every other faith is fundamentally pagan polytheist human/animal worship.

    The deluded brainwashed part of your mind is trying to fight against that truth.

    Don’t let it win. ;)

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    the only logical comprehension of the, One Infinite Unique Creator… and every other faith is fundamentally pagan polytheist human/animal worship.
     
    The predecessor, or prefigure, and major donor, to Judaism, Christianity and Islam is Zoroastrianism.

    Zoroaster established ethical principles perhaps as much as a millennia, but at least in a time before Cyrus -- both dates arrive before Ezra, the Hebrew scribe, recorded the writings that became the Old Testament.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_Age


    Zoroastrianism, another of Jaspers' examples [of axial age religions/philosophical systems], is one of the first monotheistic religions and it greatly influenced modern Abrahamic religions. . .
    The exact date of Zarathustra's life is debated by scholars, with some, such as Mary Boyce, arguing that Zoroastrianism itself is significantly older. Others, such as William W Malandra and RC Zaehner, suggest that he may indeed have been an early contemporary of Cyrus living around 600 BC.
    However, Boyce and other leading scholars who once supported much earlier dates for Zarathustra/Zoroaster have recently changed their position on the time when he likely lived, so that there is an emerging consensus regarding him as a contemporary or near-contemporary of Cyrus the Great.
     
  73. schmenz says:
    @anarchyst
    Actually Islam and Judaism have much in common. Each "faith" professes an almost identical form of supremacism with punishments for transgressions against non-believers much less severe than those committed by non-believers against those of the "chosen"--both moslem and jew. One could safely argue that Islam is an arabicized form of Judaism. Both Islam and Judaism believe in Gods of vengeance, unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption.
    Read the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran to see for yourself.
    One divergence from similarity is the way Jesus Christ is looked upon...Jews consider Jesus Christ a heretic that is "boiling in excrement for eternity", conceived by his mother Mary, who is looked upon as a harlot, who consorted with a Roman soldier.
    Contrast that with the Islamic Koran, which regards, Jesus Christ as a great prophet...not the "Son of God", but a great prophet nevertheless. His mother Mary is specifically mentioned in the Koran and is given a place of high honor.
    Now, which "belief system" is more hostile to Christianity?
    }

    Regarding the similarities of Jews and Muslims, Hilaire Belloc was pointing that out in his day. Islam essentially selected what it liked from Catholicism and Judaism and concocted a new religion, disregarding what it didn’t like in those two religions.

    But I agree that the real danger to the world is not Islam as such; the real danger comes from those who have a visceral hatred for Christianity, examples of which from their diseased Talmud you pointed out.

    Read More
    • Replies: @El Dato

    Islam essentially selected what it liked from Catholicism and Judaism and concocted a new religion, disregarding what it didn’t like in those two religions.
     
    Well, yes. It was a political ploy to get the warring tribes into the same tent and unify Arabs.

    Spectular success as there are only two tents now, with some takfiris making noises inside.
  74. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @anonymous

    Or do you want to hand your small patch of this earth, your home, the home of your people, the people of your own race and culture, to people of an alien race and culture?
     
    Sounds reasonable enough, and I would agree that your "small" patch should be yours and your progeny's.

    The problem is the limitless Greed and Psychopathy of the white race, the real engine behind their intellectual momentum.

    In simple words, the problem is that they (you), truly live by this maxim;

    What is ours is ours, and what is theirs is also ours.

    You greedy psychopathic evil fuckers have defined a world order which ensures that, along with continuous unjust wars for hegemony.

    I understand that that system may be unravelling really slowly, but the evil white empire and its minions are not going to let go easily.

    Tens, or perhaps hundreds, more millions will perish, all for the greed and psychopathy of the accursed white man.

    You’re saying that the “accursed white man” is genociding himself by suppressed reproduction and mass replacement immigration and thus deserves to die?

    You sound like a settler immigrant to the European world, and a cheerful participant in white genocide, although I suppose you may simply be a mouthpiece for the Money Power, or a dupe of the Politically Correct meme that the only good white is a self-hating white.

    As for wars for global empire, they are driven by the olive skinned as much as by whites,* although there are plenty of blacks, browns and yellows anxious to join the globalist elite, which will gladly accept them provided that they have acquired by any means the necessary billions to justify their claim to elite membership.

    In the world the globalists seek to create, humanity will be divided not between white and black, brown and yellow, but between sheep and goats, rulers and ruled.

    ——
    *Lord Rothschild was the executor of the will of the globalist empire builder, Cecil Rhodes, and the secret society for global empire** that Rhodes conceived was intended to organize elites throughout the Empire, the majority of whose citizens were not white.

    ** Rhodes Secret Society gave rise to the Council on Foreign Relations, of which nearly all US Presidents have belonged, though not J.F. Kennedy or Donald J. Trump, although Trump’s national security advisor, Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster, is a CFR member.

    Read More
  75. utu says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    I'm not sure why many non-Jews (not just whites) should like Jewish culture, institutions, power, or even many individual Jews. For the most part, if a non-Jew isn't an anti-Semite, he's either just plain stupid, or not thinking. There's nothing at all wrong in disliking Jewish culture, Jewish power, Jewish institutions, Judaism, or the Jewish collective. What is there to like in any of those for a Gentile?

    I don't really see much difference in Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews. Both groups are extremely tribal, and have a strong drive to control others. I even doubt that many of the anti-Zionist or "universalist" Jews would really do anything that would harm Israel. They may not wish to live in Israel, for obvious reasons, but if push ever comes to shove, and Israel is truly in danger, I'm sure most would reveal their true tribal loyalties by ditching the Palestinians. For the most part they use Palestinian and Arab "allies" in the West as just another ethnic group to play against Whitey, anyway, leaving their interfaith partners looking like shuffling Sambos. I even wonder if the differences between Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews aren't mostly fake. Bolsheviks in the diaspora and Nazis in the Promised Land. Tribal always.

    For the most part, if a non-Jew isn’t an anti-Semite, he’s either just plain stupid, or not thinking.

    Probably anything short of admiration and reverence comes as anti-Semitism nowadays but it would suffice to be aware of their otherness in terms of their group interests as they practice it which would be a simple application of one version of the Golden Rule like: what’s good for the goose…

    Read More
  76. annamaria says:

    Meanwhile, in the post-”revolutionary” Ukraine … http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-military-bio-labs-in-ukraine-production-of-bio-weapons-and-disease-causing-agents/5605307
    “Today, thirteen American military bio-labs operate in Ukraine. They employ only American specialists being entirely funded from the budget of the Department of Defense. Local authorities have pledged not to interfere in their work. These military labs are reported to be mainly involved in the study and production of disease-causing agents of smallpox, anthrax, and botulism. The facilities are located in the following Ukrainian cities: Odessa, Vinnytsia, Uzhgorod, Lviv (three), Kharkiv, Kyiv (four), Kherson, Ternopil.
    The network of military bio-labs in Eastern Europe gives the hawks the opportunity to avoid the Geneva Convention of 1972 on the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of biological and chemical weapons the US Senate ratified in 1973. So we witness the blatant violation of international laws”

    Read More
    • Replies: @El Dato
    Sounds unlikely. X-Files levels of unlikely.

    And what would be the reason for someone to circumvent the convention on bio/chem weapons?

    These things are hard to manage, control and deploy, basically a national version of Ahmed's Nitroglycerine-based IED. You are likely to blow yourself up.

    The US doesn't need those, it is currently "investing" hard in mini nukes FFS.
  77. Sowhat says:
    @anarchyst
    Actually Islam and Judaism have much in common. Each "faith" professes an almost identical form of supremacism with punishments for transgressions against non-believers much less severe than those committed by non-believers against those of the "chosen"--both moslem and jew. One could safely argue that Islam is an arabicized form of Judaism. Both Islam and Judaism believe in Gods of vengeance, unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption.
    Read the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran to see for yourself.
    One divergence from similarity is the way Jesus Christ is looked upon...Jews consider Jesus Christ a heretic that is "boiling in excrement for eternity", conceived by his mother Mary, who is looked upon as a harlot, who consorted with a Roman soldier.
    Contrast that with the Islamic Koran, which regards, Jesus Christ as a great prophet...not the "Son of God", but a great prophet nevertheless. His mother Mary is specifically mentioned in the Koran and is given a place of high honor.
    Now, which "belief system" is more hostile to Christianity?
    }

    Everything the Jewish propaganda in the U.S. accuses of Islam, their religion is guilty of. Just visit radioislam.com and read for yourself. The Proles are played like a violin and, to read their idiotic comments is a sad indictment of just how foolish the average uneducated yo-yo truly is.

    Read More
  78. Color Revolutions need CNN’s Anderson Cooper, and here he is again.
    Robert E. Lee was an American General and was the head of West Point for years.
    When the war broke out, he sided with his home state Virginia.

    Read More
  79. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @anarchyst
    Actually Islam and Judaism have much in common. Each "faith" professes an almost identical form of supremacism with punishments for transgressions against non-believers much less severe than those committed by non-believers against those of the "chosen"--both moslem and jew. One could safely argue that Islam is an arabicized form of Judaism. Both Islam and Judaism believe in Gods of vengeance, unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption.
    Read the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran to see for yourself.
    One divergence from similarity is the way Jesus Christ is looked upon...Jews consider Jesus Christ a heretic that is "boiling in excrement for eternity", conceived by his mother Mary, who is looked upon as a harlot, who consorted with a Roman soldier.
    Contrast that with the Islamic Koran, which regards, Jesus Christ as a great prophet...not the "Son of God", but a great prophet nevertheless. His mother Mary is specifically mentioned in the Koran and is given a place of high honor.
    Now, which "belief system" is more hostile to Christianity?
    }

    The racial supremacy as believed by the Jews, and whites in general, is completely antithetical to Islam.

    But yes, as far as spiritual ideology goes, that of Islam’s true monotheism, you are right, we believe it to be supreme… the only faith which comprehends his Oneness, Infiniteness and Uniqueness, a faith open to one and all, and the only faith acceptable to Him.

    With regards to the latter part of that statement, consider this;

    And those who believe [in true monotheism] and do righteous good deeds, they are dwellers of paradise, they will dwell therein forever. [Quran 2:82]

    Note, there is no mention about any prophets, or belief in any human, in that verse, except for a belief that He is One, and the “righteous good deeds,” should be clear enough.

    Any human, from the time of Adam(pbuh), to the present day man, has always been mentally capable of comprehending and following it, if he only chose to.

    Compare that with the hoops Christians have to jump through, such as the nonsensical “Harrowing of Hell,” to explain that salvation is only through Jesus(pbuh). Dug yourselves into a big hole there, fellas.

    Both Islam … believe in Gods of vengeance

    In the Quran, the word “forgiveness” appears at least twice as much as “punishment.” Ponder the implication of that.

    unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption

    Seriously, a westerner talking about peace? An irony so bitter. *sobs*

    Anyway, you are absolutely right about the Messiah and his mother. When we remember them, it is only with immense love and respect (may the peace and blessing of God be upon them).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    That's why it's impossible to have a sensible discussion about religion with a Muslim. You have your heads stuck up your own arses and, in order to accept this nonsensical drivel, you have to self-neuter your logical mind, which leaves you mentally feeble and unable to enter the scientific age.

    In terms of religious perfection, I'd say the middle east is a wasteland. India has persistently produced vastly higher quality religious learnings consistently over thousands of years and, best of all, hasn't felt the need to ram them down other people's throats.
    , @Ace
    ** the only faith acceptable to Him **

    You don't know what is acceptable to a German shepherd let alone to Allah.
  80. utu says:
    @anonymous

    Or do you want to hand your small patch of this earth, your home, the home of your people, the people of your own race and culture, to people of an alien race and culture?
     
    Sounds reasonable enough, and I would agree that your "small" patch should be yours and your progeny's.

    The problem is the limitless Greed and Psychopathy of the white race, the real engine behind their intellectual momentum.

    In simple words, the problem is that they (you), truly live by this maxim;

    What is ours is ours, and what is theirs is also ours.

    You greedy psychopathic evil fuckers have defined a world order which ensures that, along with continuous unjust wars for hegemony.

    I understand that that system may be unravelling really slowly, but the evil white empire and its minions are not going to let go easily.

    Tens, or perhaps hundreds, more millions will perish, all for the greed and psychopathy of the accursed white man.

    the greed and psychopathy of the accursed white man

    White men sooner or later will have to respond to people like you. White man does not have racial identity. He is really not self-aware that he is white. He defines himself by what he does. When he wakes up in the morning and sees his face in the mirror he does not see himself as white. On the other hand a black man has no other identity than the negation of being white because he can’t define himself by accomplishment which are too few but only by resentment. If people like you force on white man racial identity it will be a very sad moment for civilization and it will be very bad for people like you because then the white man will be just like you, full of resentment and irrational with the advantage of having brains and wits. Fear the white man when he awakens.

    Read More
  81. fnn says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    I'm not sure why many non-Jews (not just whites) should like Jewish culture, institutions, power, or even many individual Jews. For the most part, if a non-Jew isn't an anti-Semite, he's either just plain stupid, or not thinking. There's nothing at all wrong in disliking Jewish culture, Jewish power, Jewish institutions, Judaism, or the Jewish collective. What is there to like in any of those for a Gentile?

    I don't really see much difference in Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews. Both groups are extremely tribal, and have a strong drive to control others. I even doubt that many of the anti-Zionist or "universalist" Jews would really do anything that would harm Israel. They may not wish to live in Israel, for obvious reasons, but if push ever comes to shove, and Israel is truly in danger, I'm sure most would reveal their true tribal loyalties by ditching the Palestinians. For the most part they use Palestinian and Arab "allies" in the West as just another ethnic group to play against Whitey, anyway, leaving their interfaith partners looking like shuffling Sambos. I even wonder if the differences between Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews aren't mostly fake. Bolsheviks in the diaspora and Nazis in the Promised Land. Tribal always.

    The pro-Palestinian movement in the US and UK (but really only the US counts) is controlled by liberal so-called anti-Zionist Jewish gatekeepers. This may be the reason it never seems to make any progress.

    Relevant video:

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Phyllis Bennis (at 3 minutes + )

    heh heh heh

    C Span put on a fair-and-balanced dog & pony show, pitting Bennis against a Foundation for Defense of Democracy trained hasbarat, someone named Adesnik -- great big, square-jawed E European mug, or maybe Hungarian.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?433093-3/washington-journal-david-adesnik-phyllis-bennis-discuss-trump-administration-foreign-policy

    Bennis & Adesnik were thick as thieves in blaming Trump for his immorality in not condemning "white supremacists" and "neo Nazis" in "Charlotte" (per Bennis) / "Charlottesville" (Adesnik).

    Bennis said US is in Afghanistan for the resources, esp. lithium; Adnesik said, "that's a conspiracy theory," whereupon Bennis back-pedaled and blamed the quest for lithium on Trump, "who has connections who want those resources."
    Global Resources reported in 2010 that US war on Afghanistan was for gas & lithium.

    On Palestine, Bennis & Adesnik were more alike than different, despite Adesnik's phony outrage when Bennis called Israel "apartheid."
    "S Africans did not lob rockets, Palestinians do," Adesnik argued, so "it's not apartheid."
    Bennis, bless her heart, said, "Yes it is." (I sorta recall the burning-tire necklaces http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-2851/WARNING-GRAPHIC-CONTENT-Necklace-lynchings-Africa.html )
    so there.
  82. @Huggbear
    Is it possible to be anti-Zionist without being anti-Semitic?

    I think they would because the term has very bad connotations now. It has morphed its original meaning, but the short answer is definitely YES although most Jews in California would not agree.

    Let’s try and understand :


    There is great confusion about what Zionism actually means and how it is defined and where the term arose from. To understand ANTI-ZIONISM it is good to understand a little history.

    HOW THE TERM AROSE

    Zion is a hill near Jerusalem (now in the city), widely symbolizing the Land of Israel. Zionism was nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land.

    WHY ZIONISM AROSE

    Since the first centuries CE, most Jews have lived outside the Land of Israel (Eretz Israel, better known as Palestine), although there has been a constant minority presence of Jews. According to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Eretz Israel was a land CONDITIONALLY promised to the Jews by God according to the Hebrew and Greek Bibles and the Quran, respectively but conditional upon righteous behaviour.

    The Diaspora began in 586 BCE during the Babylonian occupation of Israel. The Babylonians destroyed the First Temple took the Israelites back to Babylon, which was central to Jewish culture at the time and gave rise to their venerated “book” - The Babylonian Talmud.

    Many subsequently returned to Israel to rebuild the Temple when the Babylonian King died and set about rebuilding the Temple.

    After the 1st century Great Revolt and the 2nd century Bar Kokhba revolt , the Roman Empire expelled the Jews from Judea , changing the name to "Syria Palaestina".

    The Bar Kokhba revolt caused a spike in anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution. The ensuing exile from Judea greatly increased the percent of Jews who were dispersed throughout the Diaspora instead of living in their original home intermarrying with other races kept the numbers up along with the mass conversion of Khazaria to Judaism in the 8th Century. ( these “new” Jews subsequently populated the Polish hinterland known as “The Pale of the Settlement” and spoke Yiddish. They are the original Ashkenaz.

    In the 17th century Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676) announced himself as the Messiah and gained many Jews to his side, forming a base in Salonika. He first tried to establish a settlement in Gaza, but moved later to Smyrna. After deposing the old rabbi Aaron Lapapa in the spring of 1666, the Jewish community of Avignon France, prepared to emigrate to the new kingdom.

    The readiness of the Jews of the time to believe the messianic claims of Sabbatai Zevi may be largely explained by the desperate state of Central European Jewry in the mid-17th century. The bloody pogroms of Bohdan Khmelnytsky had wiped out one-third of the Jewish population and destroyed many centres of Jewish learning and communal life due to their association with Usurious practices and the Talmudic “Worldview” .

    Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in central and eastern Europe as a national revival movement, in reaction to anti-Semitic and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe.

    Soon after this most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired state in Palestine, then an area controlled by the Ottoman Empire.

    A religious variety of Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity defined as adherence to religious Judaism, opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies, and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be a majority nation in their own state.

    There are other varieties of Zionism. One called cultural Zionism was founded and represented most prominently by Ahad Ha'am, fostered a secular vision of a Jewish "spiritual centre" in Israel, this is to be contrasted with Political Zionism which was established with the political goal of creating a Jewish state in order to create a nation where Jews could be the majority, rather than the minority they were in the many nations in the diaspora.

    THE AUTHOR OF MODERN POLITICAL ZIONISM

    Theodor Herzl, is considered the ideological father of Zionism, considered Anti-Semitism as an eternal feature of all societies in which Jews lived as minorities, and that only a separation could allow Jews to escape eternal prosecution.

    "Let them give us sovereignty over a piece of of the Earth's surface, just sufficient for the needs of our people, then we will do the rest!" he proclaimed exposing his plan."

    Major aspects of the Zionist idea are represented in the Israeli Declaration of Independence :

    1.The Land of Israel was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped. Here they first attained to statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance and gave to the world the eternal Book of Books.

    2.After being forcibly exiled from their land, the people kept faith with it throughout their Dispersion and never ceased to pray and hope for their return to it and for the restoration in it of their political freedom.

    3.Impelled by this historic and traditional attachment, Jews strove in every successive generation to re-establish themselves in their ancient homeland. In recent decades they returned in their masses.

    Herzl came to reject his early ideas regarding Jewish emancipation and assimilation and to believe that the Jews must remove themselves from Europe and create their own state. Beginning in late 1895, Herzl wrote "Der Judenstaat" (The State of the Jews), which was published February 1896 to immediate acclaim and controversy.

    The book argued that the Jewish people should leave Europe if they wished to, either for Argentina or, preferably, for Palestine, their historic homeland. The Jews possessed a nationality; all they were missing was a nation and a state of their own.

    In "Der Judenstaat" he writes:

    "The Jewish question persists wherever Jews live in appreciable numbers. Wherever it does not exist, it is brought in together with Jewish immigrants. We are naturally drawn into those places where we are not persecuted, and our appearance there gives rise to persecution. This is the case, and will inevitably be so, everywhere, even in highly civilised countries—see, for instance, France—so long as the Jewish question is not solved on the political level."

    Only through a Jewish state could they avoid anti-Semitism, express their culture freely and practice their religion without hindrance.

    Herzl’s ideas spread rapidly throughout the Jewish world and attracted international attention. Supporters of existing Zionist movements, such as the Hovevei Zion, immediately allied themselves with him, but establishment Jewry vilified him and considered his ideas as a threat to their attempts at integration and a rebellion against God.

    The book concludes:

    "Therefore I believe that a wondrous generation of Jews will spring into existence. The Maccabeans will rise again. Let me repeat once more my opening words:

    The Jews who wish for a State will have it.We shall live at last as free men on our own soil, and die peacefully in our own homes.The world will be freed by our liberty, enriched by our wealth, magnified by our greatness. And whatever we attempt there to accomplish for our own welfare, will react powerfully and beneficially for the good of humanity"

    Herzl publicly met Wilhelm II in 1898. The meeting significantly advanced Herzl's and Zionism's legitimacy in Jewish and world opinion.

    Unlike Herzl, the founder of political Zionism, Ahad Ha'am strived for Israel to be "a Jewish state and not merely a state of Jews".

    ANTI-ZIONISM

    Advocates of Zionism view it as a national liberation movement for the repatriation of a persecuted people residing as minorities in a variety of nations, to the homeland to which they had a historical connection.

    Throughout the first decade of the Zionist movement, there were several instances where Zionist figures supported a Jewish state in places outside Palestine, such as Uganda and Argentina. Even Theodor Herzl, the founder of political Zionism was initially content with any Jewish self-governed state.

    However, other Zionists emphasized the memory, emotion and myth linking Jews to the Land of Israel and migrations began to Holy Land.

    Despite using Zion as the name of the movement (a name after the Jebusite fortress in Jerusalem, which became synonymous with Jerusalem), Palestine only became Herzl's main focus after his Zionist manifesto 'Judenstaat' was published in 1896, but even then he was hesitant.

    In 1903, British Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain offered Herzl 5,000 square miles in the Uganda Protectorate for Jewish settlement. Called the Uganda Scheme, it was introduced the same year to the World Zionist Organization's Congress at its sixth meeting, where a fierce debate ensued.

    It should also be noted that throughout the 1930s when MOST European countries were asking Jews to leave their countries not just Germany, there was a progressive exodus eastward through Germany where camps were built to house the mass migration on their way. Some of these later turned into the extermination camps of the Holocaust as Nazism began to oppose Zionism and, arguably, its progeny Communism / Bolshevism.

    In the early days both Hitler and the World Zionist organisation shared the same objective of populating Palestine with returning Jews. The agreement between Hitler and the Zionist movement was known as the Ha’avara Agreement. In other words most European countries wanted the Jews OUT and the reason for this is another long discussion but boils down to their “Worldview” fostered by the Babylonian Talmud and the focus on Usurious business practices. Europe, at that time, was principally Catholic and viewed USURY and SODOMY as category partners in immorality.

    More worrying is the discussion topic promoted by the Rothschild dynasty in the World Zionist Conference in the early 1900s that discuss Zionism becoming a World Dominant Ideology with NWO ambitions.

    Critics of Zionism view it as a colonialist,racist and exceptionalist ideology that led advocates to violence during Mandatory Palestine, followed by the forced exodus of Palestinians, and the subsequent denial of their human rights.

    Furthermore the Zionist Ashkenazi sect have NWO order aspirations and push their worldview through the Neo-Con movement that has taken Washington captive since 1991. They formulated the PNAC ( Plan for the New American Century) and leading policies like “Open Immigration” that destroy American and indeed Western Nations from within by using Muslims as the “tip of the spear” to destroy our inherited culture.

    When a “Group” that governs the political agenda of the USA - TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE USA - requires a very serious spotlight on them.New American Century (PNAC), which has essentially dictated Bush regime "defense" policies since early 2001:

    These PNACzi's. Credited with this incredible yet frightening nonsense are the following higher-ups in the current false US "presidential" regime: Paul Wolfowitz, then with the Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University I. Lewis Libby, then with the Wall Street firm of Dechert Price & Rhoads ... and the following well-known "neo-cons" and for the most part Zionists:

    1. Roger Barnett, U.S. Naval War College Alvin Bernstein, National Defense University
    2. Stephen Cambone, National Defense University
    3. Eliot Cohen, Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
    4. Devon Gaffney Cross, Donors' Forum for International Affairs
    5. Thomas Donnelly, Project for the New American Century
    6. David Epstein, Office of Secretary of Defense, Net Assessment
    7. David Fautua, Lt. Col., U.S. Army
    8. Dan Goure, Center for Strategic and International Studies
    9. Donald Kagan, Yale University
    10. Fred Kagan, U. S. Military Academy at West Point
    11. Robert Kagan, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
    12. Robert Killebrew, Col., USA (Ret.)
    13. William Kristol, The Weekly Standard
    14. Mark Lagon, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
    15. James Lasswell, GAMA Corporation Robert Martinage, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
    16. Phil Meilinger, U.S. Naval War College
    17. Mackubin Owens, U.S. Naval War College
    18. Steve Rosen, Harvard University
    19. Gary Schmitt, Project for the New American Century
    20. Abram Shulsky, The RAND Corporation
    21. Michael Vickers, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
    22. Barry Watts, Northrop Grumman Corporation
    23. Dov Zakheim, System Planning Corporation .

    If a particular group become a Power Elite and manage a country to the detriment of the Nationalist structures in a non patriotic way we are bound to ask Why? and what is the common link between them, namely, Zionism, for this is the Political Ideology that is confused with the “homeland” idea.

    Thus the new anti-Zionism and is being incorrectly equated with anti-Semitism emanates from the far-right, the political left, and a growing Muslim population within European nations. A statistical analysis shows that 150 million people across Europe have "serious anti-Semitic" or "demonic view of Israel" because of conflation of all Israelis with this poisenous ideology.

    Cooper, Abraham and Harold Brackman. "Hitler’s e-book blitzkrieg.(http://www.jewishjournal.com/cul...) *Jewish Journal*. 15 January 2014. 15 January 2014.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Zionism is a loaded term which can mean many different things as a consultation of Wikipedia will inform you. Generally, the Anti-Zionists will be those who oppose the territorial claims as set out in the Zionist agenda of 1919 and illustrated in the map at the top of this blog.

    The “homeland” of the Jews in a State that is pluralist within the geographic boundaries that comply partially with the conditionality of the “Abrahamic covenant”, the territorial gains by successive wars, the sanction of international Law, the support of the UN , the recognition of the Palestinians . These latter who numbered 1 million in 1948 compared with the Jews 300,000 in that land.

    Thus what we have is a complex and developing issue that could lead to Nuclear Wars and which is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon and certainly not under the current American Neo-con influences.

    Drain that Swamp and fast!

    Im case others want more info on this

    “The hidden history of zionism”

    http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/index.htm

    The Pentagon’s “highland forum” (and how the deepstate infiltrated tech giants, google, facebook, amazon)

    https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

    More and more people are becoming aware of the “elephant in the room” and its only a matter of time before it hits a critical mass.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Huggbear
    This is an absolutely fascinating return post - for which many thanks. I agree with your sentiments entirely.
    I started my research with no dog in the game. I was just curious about world geopolitics and the seemingly chaotic decisions and events that have affected the ME and Europe. This was about the time Trump posed his candidacy for POTUS.

    The further I dug and researched the more "the elephant in the room" became clear.

    I started posting my findings with references on Californian discussion sites like Quora.com. The bile and vitriol that came my way would grace any of the circles of Dante's Hell. I realised that Truthseekers are not welcome and there is much propaganda in the Matrix and much censorship.

    Since then the scales have fallen off my eyes - I hope many like me experience this same phenomena - we urgently need the World to wake up to the games. Globalisation does not have to be this way!

    Thank you for your information and please use my email to send me any other links you deem fit - in order that I can do my bit to wake people up!!

    Best Wishes
  83. @LauraMR
    Correction. It is not a globalist elite but a galactic elite.

    Ancient aliens, people, ancient aliens.

    Anunaki come. Hide your women and load your rifles!

    Read More
  84. @Fran Macadam
    The fact of the matter is, there are areas of Miami Florida I personally am familiar with, where it's not safe to be walking while black, after dark. They are largely Cuban emigre neighborhoods, not majority Anglo.

    Blacks pretty much roam about freely in America without any issues. When they do have issues, it’s usually in hispanic neighborhoods. White areas are pretty much open to anyone, hut it’s whites who face no-go zones throughout the nation. Most intra-racial violence and crime is perpetrated against whites by minorities, mostly black minorities.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    interracial violence instead of intraracial violence.
  85. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @fnn
    The pro-Palestinian movement in the US and UK (but really only the US counts) is controlled by liberal so-called anti-Zionist Jewish gatekeepers. This may be the reason it never seems to make any progress.

    Relevant video:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB2lDJJr3lE

    Phyllis Bennis (at 3 minutes + )

    heh heh heh

    C Span put on a fair-and-balanced dog & pony show, pitting Bennis against a Foundation for Defense of Democracy trained hasbarat, someone named Adesnik — great big, square-jawed E European mug, or maybe Hungarian.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?433093-3/washington-journal-david-adesnik-phyllis-bennis-discuss-trump-administration-foreign-policy

    Bennis & Adesnik were thick as thieves in blaming Trump for his immorality in not condemning “white supremacists” and “neo Nazis” in “Charlotte” (per Bennis) / “Charlottesville” (Adesnik).

    Bennis said US is in Afghanistan for the resources, esp. lithium; Adnesik said, “that’s a conspiracy theory,” whereupon Bennis back-pedaled and blamed the quest for lithium on Trump, “who has connections who want those resources.”
    Global Resources reported in 2010 that US war on Afghanistan was for gas & lithium.

    On Palestine, Bennis & Adesnik were more alike than different, despite Adesnik’s phony outrage when Bennis called Israel “apartheid.”
    “S Africans did not lob rockets, Palestinians do,” Adesnik argued, so “it’s not apartheid.”
    Bennis, bless her heart, said, “Yes it is.” (I sorta recall the burning-tire necklaces http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-2851/WARNING-GRAPHIC-CONTENT-Necklace-lynchings-Africa.html )
    so there.

    Read More
  86. @Thoot
    The Confederacy lost the war they launched on the US. Even Robert E Lee himself counseled that putting up statues to Confederates was ill-advised and would only serve to keep the tensions of war alive. It's the United States, not the Union-Confederate States. For what possible reason should there be statues honoring those who waged war on the US?

    The reason is based in the fact that most of the statues were put up during the Jim Crow era as a way to emphasize that "we lost the war but we still advocate oppression of non-whites." That aim was made clear in much of the rhetoric around their construction.


    I'd guess that at least 50% of the people defending the statues know little of how/why they were put up. But whether one loathes antifa or not - the fact that a bunch of neo-Nazis and other white supremacists are defending the statues makes it clear what they represent.

    I don’t know exactly which statue(s) you mean, but many statues honoring the Confederacy were erected in the early 1900s by the Daughters of the Confederacy, at pretty much the same time that Teddy Roosevelt told Booker T. Washington to take a hike. After the destruction of the War and Reconstruction, and the continued struggles of the region, it makes sense that the Lost Cause mythology would take root.

    Maybe among the elites of the South the movement was an attempt to regain lost power, but for the majority of Southerners who had always been treated like serfs by the gentry, and whose Confederate ancestors never owned slaves, the commemoration of the Confederacy has always served the purpose of honoring their own ancestors, and was/is an expression of their desire to be free of their masters from the North, who never did much good for them. Calling these people neo-Nazis or white supremacists is just stupid. National Socialism is not an American or Southern ideology or movement, and if current levels of voluntary segregation are an indication of white supremacy, then the Good Whites, Jews and SJWs of other hues in the North are the true racial supremacists.

    Read More
  87. @OilcanFloyd
    Blacks pretty much roam about freely in America without any issues. When they do have issues, it's usually in hispanic neighborhoods. White areas are pretty much open to anyone, hut it's whites who face no-go zones throughout the nation. Most intra-racial violence and crime is perpetrated against whites by minorities, mostly black minorities.

    interracial violence instead of intraracial violence.

    Read More
  88. El Dato says:
    @annamaria
    Meanwhile, in the post-"revolutionary" Ukraine ... http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-military-bio-labs-in-ukraine-production-of-bio-weapons-and-disease-causing-agents/5605307
    "Today, thirteen American military bio-labs operate in Ukraine. They employ only American specialists being entirely funded from the budget of the Department of Defense. Local authorities have pledged not to interfere in their work. These military labs are reported to be mainly involved in the study and production of disease-causing agents of smallpox, anthrax, and botulism. The facilities are located in the following Ukrainian cities: Odessa, Vinnytsia, Uzhgorod, Lviv (three), Kharkiv, Kyiv (four), Kherson, Ternopil.
    The network of military bio-labs in Eastern Europe gives the hawks the opportunity to avoid the Geneva Convention of 1972 on the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of biological and chemical weapons the US Senate ratified in 1973. So we witness the blatant violation of international laws"

    Sounds unlikely. X-Files levels of unlikely.

    And what would be the reason for someone to circumvent the convention on bio/chem weapons?

    These things are hard to manage, control and deploy, basically a national version of Ahmed’s Nitroglycerine-based IED. You are likely to blow yourself up.

    The US doesn’t need those, it is currently “investing” hard in mini nukes FFS.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "Sounds unlikely..."
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-25/20-dead-200-hospitalized-after-reports-us-lab-leaks-deadly-virus-ukraine
    "More than 20 Ukrainian soldiers have died and over 200 soldiers are hospitalized in a short period of time because of a new and deadly virus... the Californian Flu is leaked from the same place where research of this virus has been carried out. The laboratory is located near the city of Kharkov and its base for US military experts. .... It appears it is not just military that is affected, as Radio Free Europe reports a flu epidemic is sweeping through the eastern Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk -- and the conflict smoldering nearby is making the situation even worse. Doctors are unable to identify the exact strain of the virus..."
    Never underestimate the "humanitarian" interventionists from the "exceptional" nation of US.
  89. El Dato says:
    @schmenz
    Regarding the similarities of Jews and Muslims, Hilaire Belloc was pointing that out in his day. Islam essentially selected what it liked from Catholicism and Judaism and concocted a new religion, disregarding what it didn't like in those two religions.

    But I agree that the real danger to the world is not Islam as such; the real danger comes from those who have a visceral hatred for Christianity, examples of which from their diseased Talmud you pointed out.

    Islam essentially selected what it liked from Catholicism and Judaism and concocted a new religion, disregarding what it didn’t like in those two religions.

    Well, yes. It was a political ploy to get the warring tribes into the same tent and unify Arabs.

    Spectular success as there are only two tents now, with some takfiris making noises inside.

    Read More
  90. annamaria says:
    @El Dato
    Sounds unlikely. X-Files levels of unlikely.

    And what would be the reason for someone to circumvent the convention on bio/chem weapons?

    These things are hard to manage, control and deploy, basically a national version of Ahmed's Nitroglycerine-based IED. You are likely to blow yourself up.

    The US doesn't need those, it is currently "investing" hard in mini nukes FFS.

    “Sounds unlikely…”

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-25/20-dead-200-hospitalized-after-reports-us-lab-leaks-deadly-virus-ukraine

    “More than 20 Ukrainian soldiers have died and over 200 soldiers are hospitalized in a short period of time because of a new and deadly virus… the Californian Flu is leaked from the same place where research of this virus has been carried out. The laboratory is located near the city of Kharkov and its base for US military experts. …. It appears it is not just military that is affected, as Radio Free Europe reports a flu epidemic is sweeping through the eastern Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk — and the conflict smoldering nearby is making the situation even worse. Doctors are unable to identify the exact strain of the virus…”
    Never underestimate the “humanitarian” interventionists from the “exceptional” nation of US.

    Read More
  91. @anonymous

    I’m more concerned with Islam and Muslims myself.
     
    That is because you subliminally understand that Islam is true monotheism, the only logical comprehension of the, One Infinite Unique Creator... and every other faith is fundamentally pagan polytheist human/animal worship.

    The deluded brainwashed part of your mind is trying to fight against that truth.

    Don't let it win. ;)

    the only logical comprehension of the, One Infinite Unique Creator… and every other faith is fundamentally pagan polytheist human/animal worship.

    The predecessor, or prefigure, and major donor, to Judaism, Christianity and Islam is Zoroastrianism.

    Zoroaster established ethical principles perhaps as much as a millennia, but at least in a time before Cyrus — both dates arrive before Ezra, the Hebrew scribe, recorded the writings that became the Old Testament.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_Age

    Zoroastrianism, another of Jaspers’ examples [of axial age religions/philosophical systems], is one of the first monotheistic religions and it greatly influenced modern Abrahamic religions. . .
    The exact date of Zarathustra’s life is debated by scholars, with some, such as Mary Boyce, arguing that Zoroastrianism itself is significantly older. Others, such as William W Malandra and RC Zaehner, suggest that he may indeed have been an early contemporary of Cyrus living around 600 BC.
    However, Boyce and other leading scholars who once supported much earlier dates for Zarathustra/Zoroaster have recently changed their position on the time when he likely lived, so that there is an emerging consensus regarding him as a contemporary or near-contemporary of Cyrus the Great.

    Read More
  92. Ace says:
    @Jake
    Another masterpiece by Israel Shamir.

    What I would add is that this Global Deep State grew out of the American Deep State, which grew out of the English Deep State.

    And as the Anglo-Saxon Puritans were Judaizing heretics who hoped to practice genocide on white Christians who were NOT WASPs, it was a given that WASPs would ally with Jews. And it then was inevitable that eventually the Jews would replace the WASPs at the top of that partnership.

    Nothing in what I’ve read about Puritans accords with the picture you paint. They were more properly “sticklers” (versus Puritans) for wishing to admit into religious practice only that which was dictated by scripture. Vestments, stained glass windows, organs, and bishops weren’t in the Bible so none of that. The Anglicans, not unreasonably, asked why not permit anything not prohibited by scripture?

    Predestination was a strange idea that wafted over from Geneva but it hardly seems like a Jewish graft. Nothing about them seems to have been Jewish so far as I know but Cambridge provided many very learned men to the Puritan ranks. Presumably some were learned in Hebrew, but so were some learned in Greek. Were Puritans also hellenized heretics?

    Puritans were different from the rejectionist Pilgrims who would not accept anything relating to the CoE. Things did not go well for these types. However, Puritans sought an accommodation with the Church and, when departing for Salem, swore allegiance to it and the king as required. Hardly raging heretics. Catholics bore the brunt of that moniker.

    Your genocide point is absurd.

    Read More
  93. Ace says:
    @Sam J.
    "...Yes, present diversity-driven overestimation of Blacks’ contribution to the American civilisation can be annoying, especially as it is supposed to provide cover for the exceedingly high rate of their incarceration. Deal with it..."


    That's not the problem with Blacks and that's not why they are in jail. They're in jail for drugs, robbery, theft, assault, rape and murder. Even if we waive the drugs part there's still robbery, theft, assault, rape and murder of which there's plenty of that left. I don't see any solution for that unless you don't mind the present trend for ignoring Black crime and pleading it down.

    Quite so. The fairy tale is that Rufus and Donte are innocent, harmless waifs languishing in Supermax because of horrid prosecutors insane for hanging felonies on them for “a little weed.” In reality, the drug offense was but one of the available charges and it’s easier to get a plea on a drug count. Counts involving violence are, for one, hazardous for witnesses who fear retaliation.

    Mr. Shamir is mistaken in the extreme to advocate freeing scum. It is pandering to the unreasonable black sense of victimization when black criminality us the real issue.

    Read More
  94. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @anonymous
    The racial supremacy as believed by the Jews, and whites in general, is completely antithetical to Islam.

    But yes, as far as spiritual ideology goes, that of Islam's true monotheism, you are right, we believe it to be supreme... the only faith which comprehends his Oneness, Infiniteness and Uniqueness, a faith open to one and all, and the only faith acceptable to Him.

    With regards to the latter part of that statement, consider this;

    And those who believe [in true monotheism] and do righteous good deeds, they are dwellers of paradise, they will dwell therein forever. [Quran 2:82]

    Note, there is no mention about any prophets, or belief in any human, in that verse, except for a belief that He is One, and the "righteous good deeds," should be clear enough.

    Any human, from the time of Adam(pbuh), to the present day man, has always been mentally capable of comprehending and following it, if he only chose to.

    Compare that with the hoops Christians have to jump through, such as the nonsensical "Harrowing of Hell," to explain that salvation is only through Jesus(pbuh). Dug yourselves into a big hole there, fellas.

    Both Islam ... believe in Gods of vengeance
     
    In the Quran, the word "forgiveness" appears at least twice as much as "punishment." Ponder the implication of that.

    unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption
     
    Seriously, a westerner talking about peace? An irony so bitter. *sobs*

    Anyway, you are absolutely right about the Messiah and his mother. When we remember them, it is only with immense love and respect (may the peace and blessing of God be upon them).

    That’s why it’s impossible to have a sensible discussion about religion with a Muslim. You have your heads stuck up your own arses and, in order to accept this nonsensical drivel, you have to self-neuter your logical mind, which leaves you mentally feeble and unable to enter the scientific age.

    In terms of religious perfection, I’d say the middle east is a wasteland. India has persistently produced vastly higher quality religious learnings consistently over thousands of years and, best of all, hasn’t felt the need to ram them down other people’s throats.

    Read More
  95. Huggbear says:
    @Delinquent Snail
    Im case others want more info on this


    "The hidden history of zionism"
    http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/index.htm


    The Pentagon's "highland forum" (and how the deepstate infiltrated tech giants, google, facebook, amazon)
    https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

    More and more people are becoming aware of the "elephant in the room" and its only a matter of time before it hits a critical mass.

    This is an absolutely fascinating return post – for which many thanks. I agree with your sentiments entirely.
    I started my research with no dog in the game. I was just curious about world geopolitics and the seemingly chaotic decisions and events that have affected the ME and Europe. This was about the time Trump posed his candidacy for POTUS.

    The further I dug and researched the more “the elephant in the room” became clear.

    I started posting my findings with references on Californian discussion sites like Quora.com. The bile and vitriol that came my way would grace any of the circles of Dante’s Hell. I realised that Truthseekers are not welcome and there is much propaganda in the Matrix and much censorship.

    Since then the scales have fallen off my eyes – I hope many like me experience this same phenomena – we urgently need the World to wake up to the games. Globalisation does not have to be this way!

    Thank you for your information and please use my email to send me any other links you deem fit – in order that I can do my bit to wake people up!!

    Best Wishes

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    Agree that Quora.com became a playground for the hasbarists and propagandizers
    , @Delinquent Snail
    You are welcome. Just stay on unz and you will find all kinds of things that "the powers that be" would very much like to have been flushed down the memory hole.
  96. Ace says:
    @fnn

    I do know this: there are only two things that could cause decent, common sense folk to give a thought to post-Trotskyite Marxism (meaning, Marxism no longer focused on being a Jewish arm of genocide aimed at white cultures).
     
    Neo-Marxism (Marxism without the crackpot economics, originally a critical adaptation of classical economics) is more committed to genocide of white culture than ever. That should be obvious. It's seen in its crudest forms with the "antifa" and the "white privilege" proselytizers. All the formerly Marxist organizations and parties of the West have adopted this "cultural Marxist" ideology, so the relationship is proven cladistically.

    Yes, indeed. They are all reading off that sheet of music. Merkel’s origins are more powerful in her thinking than any realize. Similarly, westerners don’t realize to what extent the West was and is saturated with communists. The hatefest against McCarthy and Diana West was due to their having struck a big, honking nerve. Same for Sobran on Jewish power.

    The destruction of the West now underway is inexplicable unless you understand the tremendous revulsion against the West in the hearts of a great many people. Multiculturalism is extolled as something positively wonderful just because it is but it is in fact vicious. It is satanic. Leftism is a revolt against order and decency and produces disorder and indecency. The West is about to enjoy what its traitors so ardently desire.

    Read More
  97. Ace says:
    @anonymous
    The racial supremacy as believed by the Jews, and whites in general, is completely antithetical to Islam.

    But yes, as far as spiritual ideology goes, that of Islam's true monotheism, you are right, we believe it to be supreme... the only faith which comprehends his Oneness, Infiniteness and Uniqueness, a faith open to one and all, and the only faith acceptable to Him.

    With regards to the latter part of that statement, consider this;

    And those who believe [in true monotheism] and do righteous good deeds, they are dwellers of paradise, they will dwell therein forever. [Quran 2:82]

    Note, there is no mention about any prophets, or belief in any human, in that verse, except for a belief that He is One, and the "righteous good deeds," should be clear enough.

    Any human, from the time of Adam(pbuh), to the present day man, has always been mentally capable of comprehending and following it, if he only chose to.

    Compare that with the hoops Christians have to jump through, such as the nonsensical "Harrowing of Hell," to explain that salvation is only through Jesus(pbuh). Dug yourselves into a big hole there, fellas.

    Both Islam ... believe in Gods of vengeance
     
    In the Quran, the word "forgiveness" appears at least twice as much as "punishment." Ponder the implication of that.

    unlike the Christian God of peace and redemption
     
    Seriously, a westerner talking about peace? An irony so bitter. *sobs*

    Anyway, you are absolutely right about the Messiah and his mother. When we remember them, it is only with immense love and respect (may the peace and blessing of God be upon them).

    ** the only faith acceptable to Him **

    You don’t know what is acceptable to a German shepherd let alone to Allah.

    Read More
  98. annamaria says:
    @Huggbear
    This is an absolutely fascinating return post - for which many thanks. I agree with your sentiments entirely.
    I started my research with no dog in the game. I was just curious about world geopolitics and the seemingly chaotic decisions and events that have affected the ME and Europe. This was about the time Trump posed his candidacy for POTUS.

    The further I dug and researched the more "the elephant in the room" became clear.

    I started posting my findings with references on Californian discussion sites like Quora.com. The bile and vitriol that came my way would grace any of the circles of Dante's Hell. I realised that Truthseekers are not welcome and there is much propaganda in the Matrix and much censorship.

    Since then the scales have fallen off my eyes - I hope many like me experience this same phenomena - we urgently need the World to wake up to the games. Globalisation does not have to be this way!

    Thank you for your information and please use my email to send me any other links you deem fit - in order that I can do my bit to wake people up!!

    Best Wishes

    Agree that Quora.com became a playground for the hasbarists and propagandizers

    Read More
  99. Che Guava says:
    @anarchyst
    Before you give up on the Catholic Church, please look into the Society of St Pius X (SSPX). I agree with you that the Vatican II Ecumenical Council was a grave error...
    The “beginning of the end” of Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants.
    Much Catholic ritual was discarded, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their "dirty work" for them...
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Cardinal Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back" against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial
    considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize celebration of pre-Vatican II principles.

    Thank you.

    I know of the Society of Saint Pius the Tenth, and the writing of Pope Pious X agaiinst theological modernism is very good, prophetic beyond theology. Posting a link if you don’t know.

    Used to live near their HQ in Tokyo. They don’t seem to hold Mass anywhere. Well, very occasionally. Maybe.

    I complain about the lack of latin at Mass, my friend very sensibly replies ‘Nobody is undestanding it. ‘

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Your friend is at best a lazy idiot.

    Latin must be at the center of saving Western Civilization.
    , @Veritatis
    http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/08/29/liturgy-the-counterstatement-of-cardinal-sarah/
  100. @Huggbear
    This is an absolutely fascinating return post - for which many thanks. I agree with your sentiments entirely.
    I started my research with no dog in the game. I was just curious about world geopolitics and the seemingly chaotic decisions and events that have affected the ME and Europe. This was about the time Trump posed his candidacy for POTUS.

    The further I dug and researched the more "the elephant in the room" became clear.

    I started posting my findings with references on Californian discussion sites like Quora.com. The bile and vitriol that came my way would grace any of the circles of Dante's Hell. I realised that Truthseekers are not welcome and there is much propaganda in the Matrix and much censorship.

    Since then the scales have fallen off my eyes - I hope many like me experience this same phenomena - we urgently need the World to wake up to the games. Globalisation does not have to be this way!

    Thank you for your information and please use my email to send me any other links you deem fit - in order that I can do my bit to wake people up!!

    Best Wishes

    You are welcome. Just stay on unz and you will find all kinds of things that “the powers that be” would very much like to have been flushed down the memory hole.

    Read More
  101. Jake says:
    @fnn
    I agree, the last person I was almost ready to kill was a pompous Englishman.


    But we have to remember the Soviets introduced their own horrors to Eastern Europe when they took it over:
    https://archive.org/details/TheAnti-humans

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zgoda_labour_camp


    A diligent researcher would no doubt find similar facilities in Hungary and the Baltic States.

    What does what Soviets did in the 20the century have to do with THE source of the Anglo-Zionist Empire?

    Nothing. In fact, to raise the Soviets is to play sleight of hand, which is necessary to keep people in the dark.

    Let’s get at that this way: would the Soviet revolution, including the counter revolution against the Whites, have been successful without all that Jewish money from the Anglosphere?

    Not bloody likely. Rich Jews from the Anglosphere poured fortunes into toppling the Tsar and slaughtering his family and other hereditary nobles, as well as Orthodox and Catholic priests and monks. And they quickly used that same money to start slaughtering ordinary people who wre not Bolsheviks.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism being a Judaizing heresy that birthed the pro-Jewish WASP Elite was necessary to the Soviet Union being brought about.

    And remember: by the height of the Victorian, virtually 100% of the UK WASP Elites were rather strongly pro-Semitic, half to 2/3rds of them pro-Jewish and the rest pro-Arabic and pro-Islamic.

    You cannot separate the Jewish problem from the WASP problem. Not can you separate the Arabic (especially Saudi) problem from he WASP problem.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Huggbear
    JAKE
    I agree but you do not put your finger on the key source of the problem although you mention funds in passing only.

    The whole rise and fall of the Great powers in Europe can be seen through the perspective of the Ashkenazim Power Elite ( PE) that leveraged a Talmudic Worldview with the Usurious Power of Money.

    When you do the research it all boils down to this and of course the rise of the Rothschild International Banking cartels.

    Napoleon solicited the Jews to help his campaign and the Holy Roman Empire toppled along with the catholic Worldview.
    The Eastern European Lands "Pale of the Settlement" moved from a feudal aristocracy based system to one based on Usury. The peasants ended up starving as the Jewish Plutocrats diverted grain into vodka production instead of feeding the people. Pogroms and massacres followed as the peasants revolted and the Jews left for Germany.
    Everywhere we see ( even in England) when the Jews arriving the landed Aristocracy progressively ending up indebted and beholden to the Jewish Banker.
    Czarist Russia is perhaps the best example of the Jewish money men fomenting revolution as you have pointed out but it happened in Germany too.
    Bismark's Germany was no different. Jews spent a good 60 years in Germany living in peace and immense prosperity until it became clear that the German Volk were being marginalised in all matters relating to their culture and lands , in favour of the Internationalist Jews.

    In England, having dispossessed the Church of all lands and wealth accumulated over centuries - the "NEW" aristocracy ( robber barons) profited greatly from the Judaizing MONEY influences as they traded the world in the spirit of "Free Trade & Enterprise" - ( it was only free for the British of course).

    I summarise of course but the undercurrent is a Worldview that treats everything as a commercial contract and financed by huge government sponsored debt.
    In summary The JEWISH INFLUENCE from behind "the tiller" guiding and directing. The hidden hand.

    Dr E Michael Jones says it best in his 1300 page tome "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and World History"


    All said and done. There are spooky parallels in our own times to the 1930s in Germany as many of the "Goy" are awakening to the very real possibility of a Jewish Utopia being imposed on the the world AKA the NWO. - fomented by the rise of the Ashkenazi NeoCon.

    Hitler posed a threat to that and the World Zionist Organisation ( WZO ) made the mistake of trying to take him out and sactionining German exports. - the rest as they say is history.

  102. Jake says:
    @Che Guava
    Thank you.

    I know of the Society of Saint Pius the Tenth, and the writing of Pope Pious X agaiinst theological modernism is very good, prophetic beyond theology. Posting a link if you don't know.

    Used to live near their HQ in Tokyo. They don't seem to hold Mass anywhere. Well, very occasionally. Maybe.

    I complain about the lack of latin at Mass, my friend very sensibly replies 'Nobody is undestanding it. '

    Your friend is at best a lazy idiot.

    Latin must be at the center of saving Western Civilization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    I agree in part, she is not an idiot, has a simplistic Marian-centred faith, she will ask me, in Japanese Do you not love Mary?'

    My answer, sure, but parts of the RC teaching on that go far into the realm of confection.

    I don't say to my friend that the 'visions' of Fatima, the associated 'Immaculate Heart' and the extension to 'conversion' of Russia had and have a clear geopolitical purpose, though it is true, long may the Orthodox be free of the Bishop of Roma, particularly this one.
  103. @Huggbear
    Is it possible to be anti-Zionist without being anti-Semitic?

    I think they would because the term has very bad connotations now. It has morphed its original meaning, but the short answer is definitely YES although most Jews in California would not agree.

    Let’s try and understand :


    There is great confusion about what Zionism actually means and how it is defined and where the term arose from. To understand ANTI-ZIONISM it is good to understand a little history.

    HOW THE TERM AROSE

    Zion is a hill near Jerusalem (now in the city), widely symbolizing the Land of Israel. Zionism was nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land.

    WHY ZIONISM AROSE

    Since the first centuries CE, most Jews have lived outside the Land of Israel (Eretz Israel, better known as Palestine), although there has been a constant minority presence of Jews. According to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Eretz Israel was a land CONDITIONALLY promised to the Jews by God according to the Hebrew and Greek Bibles and the Quran, respectively but conditional upon righteous behaviour.

    The Diaspora began in 586 BCE during the Babylonian occupation of Israel. The Babylonians destroyed the First Temple took the Israelites back to Babylon, which was central to Jewish culture at the time and gave rise to their venerated “book” - The Babylonian Talmud.

    Many subsequently returned to Israel to rebuild the Temple when the Babylonian King died and set about rebuilding the Temple.

    After the 1st century Great Revolt and the 2nd century Bar Kokhba revolt , the Roman Empire expelled the Jews from Judea , changing the name to "Syria Palaestina".

    The Bar Kokhba revolt caused a spike in anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution. The ensuing exile from Judea greatly increased the percent of Jews who were dispersed throughout the Diaspora instead of living in their original home intermarrying with other races kept the numbers up along with the mass conversion of Khazaria to Judaism in the 8th Century. ( these “new” Jews subsequently populated the Polish hinterland known as “The Pale of the Settlement” and spoke Yiddish. They are the original Ashkenaz.

    In the 17th century Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676) announced himself as the Messiah and gained many Jews to his side, forming a base in Salonika. He first tried to establish a settlement in Gaza, but moved later to Smyrna. After deposing the old rabbi Aaron Lapapa in the spring of 1666, the Jewish community of Avignon France, prepared to emigrate to the new kingdom.

    The readiness of the Jews of the time to believe the messianic claims of Sabbatai Zevi may be largely explained by the desperate state of Central European Jewry in the mid-17th century. The bloody pogroms of Bohdan Khmelnytsky had wiped out one-third of the Jewish population and destroyed many centres of Jewish learning and communal life due to their association with Usurious practices and the Talmudic “Worldview” .

    Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in central and eastern Europe as a national revival movement, in reaction to anti-Semitic and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe.

    Soon after this most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired state in Palestine, then an area controlled by the Ottoman Empire.

    A religious variety of Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity defined as adherence to religious Judaism, opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies, and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be a majority nation in their own state.

    There are other varieties of Zionism. One called cultural Zionism was founded and represented most prominently by Ahad Ha'am, fostered a secular vision of a Jewish "spiritual centre" in Israel, this is to be contrasted with Political Zionism which was established with the political goal of creating a Jewish state in order to create a nation where Jews could be the majority, rather than the minority they were in the many nations in the diaspora.

    THE AUTHOR OF MODERN POLITICAL ZIONISM

    Theodor Herzl, is considered the ideological father of Zionism, considered Anti-Semitism as an eternal feature of all societies in which Jews lived as minorities, and that only a separation could allow Jews to escape eternal prosecution.

    "Let them give us sovereignty over a piece of of the Earth's surface, just sufficient for the needs of our people, then we will do the rest!" he proclaimed exposing his plan."

    Major aspects of the Zionist idea are represented in the Israeli Declaration of Independence :

    1.The Land of Israel was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped. Here they first attained to statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance and gave to the world the eternal Book of Books.

    2.After being forcibly exiled from their land, the people kept faith with it throughout their Dispersion and never ceased to pray and hope for their return to it and for the restoration in it of their political freedom.

    3.Impelled by this historic and traditional attachment, Jews strove in every successive generation to re-establish themselves in their ancient homeland. In recent decades they returned in their masses.

    Herzl came to reject his early ideas regarding Jewish emancipation and assimilation and to believe that the Jews must remove themselves from Europe and create their own state. Beginning in late 1895, Herzl wrote "Der Judenstaat" (The State of the Jews), which was published February 1896 to immediate acclaim and controversy.

    The book argued that the Jewish people should leave Europe if they wished to, either for Argentina or, preferably, for Palestine, their historic homeland. The Jews possessed a nationality; all they were missing was a nation and a state of their own.

    In "Der Judenstaat" he writes:

    "The Jewish question persists wherever Jews live in appreciable numbers. Wherever it does not exist, it is brought in together with Jewish immigrants. We are naturally drawn into those places where we are not persecuted, and our appearance there gives rise to persecution. This is the case, and will inevitably be so, everywhere, even in highly civilised countries—see, for instance, France—so long as the Jewish question is not solved on the political level."

    Only through a Jewish state could they avoid anti-Semitism, express their culture freely and practice their religion without hindrance.

    Herzl’s ideas spread rapidly throughout the Jewish world and attracted international attention. Supporters of existing Zionist movements, such as the Hovevei Zion, immediately allied themselves with him, but establishment Jewry vilified him and considered his ideas as a threat to their attempts at integration and a rebellion against God.

    The book concludes:

    "Therefore I believe that a wondrous generation of Jews will spring into existence. The Maccabeans will rise again. Let me repeat once more my opening words:

    The Jews who wish for a State will have it.We shall live at last as free men on our own soil, and die peacefully in our own homes.The world will be freed by our liberty, enriched by our wealth, magnified by our greatness. And whatever we attempt there to accomplish for our own welfare, will react powerfully and beneficially for the good of humanity"

    Herzl publicly met Wilhelm II in 1898. The meeting significantly advanced Herzl's and Zionism's legitimacy in Jewish and world opinion.

    Unlike Herzl, the founder of political Zionism, Ahad Ha'am strived for Israel to be "a Jewish state and not merely a state of Jews".

    ANTI-ZIONISM

    Advocates of Zionism view it as a national liberation movement for the repatriation of a persecuted people residing as minorities in a variety of nations, to the homeland to which they had a historical connection.

    Throughout the first decade of the Zionist movement, there were several instances where Zionist figures supported a Jewish state in places outside Palestine, such as Uganda and Argentina. Even Theodor Herzl, the founder of political Zionism was initially content with any Jewish self-governed state.

    However, other Zionists emphasized the memory, emotion and myth linking Jews to the Land of Israel and migrations began to Holy Land.

    Despite using Zion as the name of the movement (a name after the Jebusite fortress in Jerusalem, which became synonymous with Jerusalem), Palestine only became Herzl's main focus after his Zionist manifesto 'Judenstaat' was published in 1896, but even then he was hesitant.

    In 1903, British Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain offered Herzl 5,000 square miles in the Uganda Protectorate for Jewish settlement. Called the Uganda Scheme, it was introduced the same year to the World Zionist Organization's Congress at its sixth meeting, where a fierce debate ensued.

    It should also be noted that throughout the 1930s when MOST European countries were asking Jews to leave their countries not just Germany, there was a progressive exodus eastward through Germany where camps were built to house the mass migration on their way. Some of these later turned into the extermination camps of the Holocaust as Nazism began to oppose Zionism and, arguably, its progeny Communism / Bolshevism.

    In the early days both Hitler and the World Zionist organisation shared the same objective of populating Palestine with returning Jews. The agreement between Hitler and the Zionist movement was known as the Ha’avara Agreement. In other words most European countries wanted the Jews OUT and the reason for this is another long discussion but boils down to their “Worldview” fostered by the Babylonian Talmud and the focus on Usurious business practices. Europe, at that time, was principally Catholic and viewed USURY and SODOMY as category partners in immorality.

    More worrying is the discussion topic promoted by the Rothschild dynasty in the World Zionist Conference in the early 1900s that discuss Zionism becoming a World Dominant Ideology with NWO ambitions.

    Critics of Zionism view it as a colonialist,racist and exceptionalist ideology that led advocates to violence during Mandatory Palestine, followed by the forced exodus of Palestinians, and the subsequent denial of their human rights.

    Furthermore the Zionist Ashkenazi sect have NWO order aspirations and push their worldview through the Neo-Con movement that has taken Washington captive since 1991. They formulated the PNAC ( Plan for the New American Century) and leading policies like “Open Immigration” that destroy American and indeed Western Nations from within by using Muslims as the “tip of the spear” to destroy our inherited culture.

    When a “Group” that governs the political agenda of the USA - TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE USA - requires a very serious spotlight on them.New American Century (PNAC), which has essentially dictated Bush regime "defense" policies since early 2001:

    These PNACzi's. Credited with this incredible yet frightening nonsense are the following higher-ups in the current false US "presidential" regime: Paul Wolfowitz, then with the Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University I. Lewis Libby, then with the Wall Street firm of Dechert Price & Rhoads ... and the following well-known "neo-cons" and for the most part Zionists:

    1. Roger Barnett, U.S. Naval War College Alvin Bernstein, National Defense University
    2. Stephen Cambone, National Defense University
    3. Eliot Cohen, Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
    4. Devon Gaffney Cross, Donors' Forum for International Affairs
    5. Thomas Donnelly, Project for the New American Century
    6. David Epstein, Office of Secretary of Defense, Net Assessment
    7. David Fautua, Lt. Col., U.S. Army
    8. Dan Goure, Center for Strategic and International Studies
    9. Donald Kagan, Yale University
    10. Fred Kagan, U. S. Military Academy at West Point
    11. Robert Kagan, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
    12. Robert Killebrew, Col., USA (Ret.)
    13. William Kristol, The Weekly Standard
    14. Mark Lagon, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
    15. James Lasswell, GAMA Corporation Robert Martinage, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
    16. Phil Meilinger, U.S. Naval War College
    17. Mackubin Owens, U.S. Naval War College
    18. Steve Rosen, Harvard University
    19. Gary Schmitt, Project for the New American Century
    20. Abram Shulsky, The RAND Corporation
    21. Michael Vickers, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
    22. Barry Watts, Northrop Grumman Corporation
    23. Dov Zakheim, System Planning Corporation .

    If a particular group become a Power Elite and manage a country to the detriment of the Nationalist structures in a non patriotic way we are bound to ask Why? and what is the common link between them, namely, Zionism, for this is the Political Ideology that is confused with the “homeland” idea.

    Thus the new anti-Zionism and is being incorrectly equated with anti-Semitism emanates from the far-right, the political left, and a growing Muslim population within European nations. A statistical analysis shows that 150 million people across Europe have "serious anti-Semitic" or "demonic view of Israel" because of conflation of all Israelis with this poisenous ideology.

    Cooper, Abraham and Harold Brackman. "Hitler’s e-book blitzkrieg.(http://www.jewishjournal.com/cul...) *Jewish Journal*. 15 January 2014. 15 January 2014.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Zionism is a loaded term which can mean many different things as a consultation of Wikipedia will inform you. Generally, the Anti-Zionists will be those who oppose the territorial claims as set out in the Zionist agenda of 1919 and illustrated in the map at the top of this blog.

    The “homeland” of the Jews in a State that is pluralist within the geographic boundaries that comply partially with the conditionality of the “Abrahamic covenant”, the territorial gains by successive wars, the sanction of international Law, the support of the UN , the recognition of the Palestinians . These latter who numbered 1 million in 1948 compared with the Jews 300,000 in that land.

    Thus what we have is a complex and developing issue that could lead to Nuclear Wars and which is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon and certainly not under the current American Neo-con influences.

    Drain that Swamp and fast!

    “…that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land.”
    While I load your energy and effort at producing such an analysis, I think that your article would have far more factual value if you were to omit the ” re” from re-establishment.
    The problem with the biblical stories is that there has been almost no archeological evidence to substantiate it. One illuminated Israeli archeologist who candidly exposed the by local myth was the late Yigal Yadin who stated categorically that there is no proof whatsoever of the existence of the city of Jerico. So far, the Israelis after decades of occupation of the West Bank have failed miserably to unearth archeological evidence related to the temple of Jerusalem. So they proclaimed the remaining wall of the Roman fortress of Antonia as an archeological proof of the temple.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Huggbear
    Thanks for the LAUDING and apologies for the LOADING - the article was a bit long but there is so much misinformation and idiocy talked about Zionism that I thought I would post my own analysis, having approached this subject without a "dog in the race" and a previous rather favourable view of the Israeli plutocracy after a lifetime of indoctrination.

    You make a good point about the archeology and open with that comment another veritable "can of worms" where it is really difficult for the average Joe to sift through the various contributions to TRUTH.
    Most people are now aware of remains of giants and peculiarly shaped skulls and odd features like the solid slabs of rock at Baalbek and Gobekli Tepi ( forgive the spelling) and so many more of the "hidden" archeology that is never explained or discussed transparently by experts. Ron Wyatt apparently found the Ark of the Covenant under the Dome of the Rock as well as the Dead Sea miracle crossing point, Graham Hancock is all over the internet with new archeological findings - these may be fringe but they make important observations on the whole subject of the veracity of archeology in the Holy Lands.
    I saw for example recently that there is some possible Archeological evidence that Solomon's Temple is not at the site of the Wailing Wall but some distance away in a park area near the hill at Jerusalem. That King David's palace site was not in Jerusalem at all.........all very perplexing and leaves one wondering what to believe.

    I think however coming back on topic. There is enough evidence in the Bible to postulate a Hebrew presence in the lands discussed, even if the Greater Israel Project boundaries ( Oded Yinon Plan) which effectively is from the Nile to the Euphrates is somewhat exaggerated.
    Thus I would defend my RE but possibly with the caveat that the precise boundaries are somewhat speculative ..until that is archeology shows different.
  104. @jacques sheete

    Zionists are good for one thing. They are excellent for revealing the hidden Jewish racism.
     
    True.

    They're also good at presenting themselves as something they're not, (just like Trump, btw).

    They present themselves as victims, while the opposite is more accurate.

    They present themselves as Semites, while Palestinians are probably much more "Semitic" than they are. Zionists, in fact, are among the most anti-Semitic characters around.

    They present themselves as Jews, and i'd like to know by what standard. Most are likely not even religious.

    They present themselves as sane and "intelligent," but their actions don't show it.

    We're told that they are moral; I'd like to know how.

    They are good for showing the world what crazed narcissism looks like.

    Short and sweet comment but condenses in it a mighty historic truth. Turning the victim into an aggressor and a villain is one art that Zionists have mastered and at which they are second to none.

    Read More
  105. Huggbear says:
    @Joe Levantine
    "...that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land."
    While I load your energy and effort at producing such an analysis, I think that your article would have far more factual value if you were to omit the " re" from re-establishment.
    The problem with the biblical stories is that there has been almost no archeological evidence to substantiate it. One illuminated Israeli archeologist who candidly exposed the by local myth was the late Yigal Yadin who stated categorically that there is no proof whatsoever of the existence of the city of Jerico. So far, the Israelis after decades of occupation of the West Bank have failed miserably to unearth archeological evidence related to the temple of Jerusalem. So they proclaimed the remaining wall of the Roman fortress of Antonia as an archeological proof of the temple.

    Thanks for the LAUDING and apologies for the LOADING – the article was a bit long but there is so much misinformation and idiocy talked about Zionism that I thought I would post my own analysis, having approached this subject without a “dog in the race” and a previous rather favourable view of the Israeli plutocracy after a lifetime of indoctrination.

    You make a good point about the archeology and open with that comment another veritable “can of worms” where it is really difficult for the average Joe to sift through the various contributions to TRUTH.
    Most people are now aware of remains of giants and peculiarly shaped skulls and odd features like the solid slabs of rock at Baalbek and Gobekli Tepi ( forgive the spelling) and so many more of the “hidden” archeology that is never explained or discussed transparently by experts. Ron Wyatt apparently found the Ark of the Covenant under the Dome of the Rock as well as the Dead Sea miracle crossing point, Graham Hancock is all over the internet with new archeological findings – these may be fringe but they make important observations on the whole subject of the veracity of archeology in the Holy Lands.
    I saw for example recently that there is some possible Archeological evidence that Solomon’s Temple is not at the site of the Wailing Wall but some distance away in a park area near the hill at Jerusalem. That King David’s palace site was not in Jerusalem at all………all very perplexing and leaves one wondering what to believe.

    I think however coming back on topic. There is enough evidence in the Bible to postulate a Hebrew presence in the lands discussed, even if the Greater Israel Project boundaries ( Oded Yinon Plan) which effectively is from the Nile to the Euphrates is somewhat exaggerated.
    Thus I would defend my RE but possibly with the caveat that the precise boundaries are somewhat speculative ..until that is archeology shows different.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
    Sorry for the misspelling of lauding which is what was really meant.
    I would like to know if you have read the book of Egyptian Doctor Ashraf Ezzat " Egypt knew no Pharoes nor Israelites" which give IMO an interesting and original view of the Israeli biblical story. I would very much appreciate your feedback for you have a truly scholarly approach.
  106. Huggbear says:
    @Brabantian
    Israel Shamir has some terrific but sadly likely-only-dream-world recommendations for Donald Trump, asking him to be the man whom voters hoped he was ... how beautiful it would be indeed, for Trump to end the Mid-East & South Asian wars, close Guantánamo, let hundreds of thousands of non-violent black & other offenders / railroaded innocents out of US prison (as Vladimir Putin did for hundreds of thousands of Russian prisoners) ... this last an especially brilliant suggestion by Shamir, as that one Lincolnesque act would be a total trumping of the 'racist' slurs against Trump & his voters

    But the question is ... Can we really hope that the USA 'Tsar' will or could act well & honourably for his people? Was Trump just the Master New York Salesman all along? Or is it that Trump in his heart really wanted to do some good with that high office he was able to win ... Trump who trumpeted to the world the great truth that the News is Fake ... but a Trump who is in fact now in part a hostage under the direst threats, not only against himself but all his family? As this photo meme suggested
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2a08e9c871ceb69f30c4fdeb633e84a1b43c23bf2e3367d5f921b090e2fbdfd6.jpg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHbrOg092GA

    Too old to worry about anything other than “giving back” with a romantic idea about the “American Dream” with a Christian Worldview – I have every confidence that Mr Trump’s “heart” is in the right place for his mission.

    His problem is “Draining the Swamp” – which if you look at the above video explains how it is composed with elements of the SHADOW government and the DEEP STATE.

    Until this battle is over – wheel spinning will be the order of the day and progress against the Vision will be slow.

    We have seen however that he is nothing if not dedicated to the mission but the recent foray back to Afghanistan shows that he has to make some compromises.

    Read More
  107. Huggbear says:
    @Jake
    What does what Soviets did in the 20the century have to do with THE source of the Anglo-Zionist Empire?

    Nothing. In fact, to raise the Soviets is to play sleight of hand, which is necessary to keep people in the dark.

    Let's get at that this way: would the Soviet revolution, including the counter revolution against the Whites, have been successful without all that Jewish money from the Anglosphere?

    Not bloody likely. Rich Jews from the Anglosphere poured fortunes into toppling the Tsar and slaughtering his family and other hereditary nobles, as well as Orthodox and Catholic priests and monks. And they quickly used that same money to start slaughtering ordinary people who wre not Bolsheviks.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism being a Judaizing heresy that birthed the pro-Jewish WASP Elite was necessary to the Soviet Union being brought about.

    And remember: by the height of the Victorian, virtually 100% of the UK WASP Elites were rather strongly pro-Semitic, half to 2/3rds of them pro-Jewish and the rest pro-Arabic and pro-Islamic.

    You cannot separate the Jewish problem from the WASP problem. Not can you separate the Arabic (especially Saudi) problem from he WASP problem.

    JAKE
    I agree but you do not put your finger on the key source of the problem although you mention funds in passing only.

    The whole rise and fall of the Great powers in Europe can be seen through the perspective of the Ashkenazim Power Elite ( PE) that leveraged a Talmudic Worldview with the Usurious Power of Money.

    When you do the research it all boils down to this and of course the rise of the Rothschild International Banking cartels.

    Napoleon solicited the Jews to help his campaign and the Holy Roman Empire toppled along with the catholic Worldview.
    The Eastern European Lands “Pale of the Settlement” moved from a feudal aristocracy based system to one based on Usury. The peasants ended up starving as the Jewish Plutocrats diverted grain into vodka production instead of feeding the people. Pogroms and massacres followed as the peasants revolted and the Jews left for Germany.
    Everywhere we see ( even in England) when the Jews arriving the landed Aristocracy progressively ending up indebted and beholden to the Jewish Banker.
    Czarist Russia is perhaps the best example of the Jewish money men fomenting revolution as you have pointed out but it happened in Germany too.
    Bismark’s Germany was no different. Jews spent a good 60 years in Germany living in peace and immense prosperity until it became clear that the German Volk were being marginalised in all matters relating to their culture and lands , in favour of the Internationalist Jews.

    In England, having dispossessed the Church of all lands and wealth accumulated over centuries – the “NEW” aristocracy ( robber barons) profited greatly from the Judaizing MONEY influences as they traded the world in the spirit of “Free Trade & Enterprise” – ( it was only free for the British of course).

    I summarise of course but the undercurrent is a Worldview that treats everything as a commercial contract and financed by huge government sponsored debt.
    In summary The JEWISH INFLUENCE from behind “the tiller” guiding and directing. The hidden hand.

    Dr E Michael Jones says it best in his 1300 page tome “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and World History”

    All said and done. There are spooky parallels in our own times to the 1930s in Germany as many of the “Goy” are awakening to the very real possibility of a Jewish Utopia being imposed on the the world AKA the NWO. – fomented by the rise of the Ashkenazi NeoCon.

    Hitler posed a threat to that and the World Zionist Organisation ( WZO ) made the mistake of trying to take him out and sactionining German exports. – the rest as they say is history.

    Read More
  108. Huggbear says:
    @anarchyst
    Before you give up on the Catholic Church, please look into the Society of St Pius X (SSPX). I agree with you that the Vatican II Ecumenical Council was a grave error...
    The “beginning of the end” of Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants.
    Much Catholic ritual was discarded, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their "dirty work" for them...
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Cardinal Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back" against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial
    considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize celebration of pre-Vatican II principles.

    As an Anglican Christian I was brought up never to understand the Catholics. In my latter years I have come to understand what a vast repository of “ideals” and “intellectual chiseling” the Catholic Church has undergone over the centuries and how “right” it is on many of the ideals.

    Can I say how much I enjoyed your ditty which summarised exactly my present feelings and even explained the reason for celibacy.

    Everywhere it seems, Rome is no exception, we see the clash of the ideals of Jesus ( PBUH) and the those rather nasty Jewish Pharisees. Whether Church or Geopolitics the Power of Mammon and its nefarious influences subverting and perverting.

    Can Catholicism ever recover from Vatican 11 ?

    Not it would seem without a major Revolution – that is never going to happen with this Pope .

    Read More
    • Replies: @schmenz
    Catholicism recovered after the Arian heresy of the 4th century so it will recover after the desolation brought on by the Modernists. Whether we will live to see their defeat is another matter.
  109. @Huggbear
    Thanks for the LAUDING and apologies for the LOADING - the article was a bit long but there is so much misinformation and idiocy talked about Zionism that I thought I would post my own analysis, having approached this subject without a "dog in the race" and a previous rather favourable view of the Israeli plutocracy after a lifetime of indoctrination.

    You make a good point about the archeology and open with that comment another veritable "can of worms" where it is really difficult for the average Joe to sift through the various contributions to TRUTH.
    Most people are now aware of remains of giants and peculiarly shaped skulls and odd features like the solid slabs of rock at Baalbek and Gobekli Tepi ( forgive the spelling) and so many more of the "hidden" archeology that is never explained or discussed transparently by experts. Ron Wyatt apparently found the Ark of the Covenant under the Dome of the Rock as well as the Dead Sea miracle crossing point, Graham Hancock is all over the internet with new archeological findings - these may be fringe but they make important observations on the whole subject of the veracity of archeology in the Holy Lands.
    I saw for example recently that there is some possible Archeological evidence that Solomon's Temple is not at the site of the Wailing Wall but some distance away in a park area near the hill at Jerusalem. That King David's palace site was not in Jerusalem at all.........all very perplexing and leaves one wondering what to believe.

    I think however coming back on topic. There is enough evidence in the Bible to postulate a Hebrew presence in the lands discussed, even if the Greater Israel Project boundaries ( Oded Yinon Plan) which effectively is from the Nile to the Euphrates is somewhat exaggerated.
    Thus I would defend my RE but possibly with the caveat that the precise boundaries are somewhat speculative ..until that is archeology shows different.

    Sorry for the misspelling of lauding which is what was really meant.
    I would like to know if you have read the book of Egyptian Doctor Ashraf Ezzat ” Egypt knew no Pharoes nor Israelites” which give IMO an interesting and original view of the Israeli biblical story. I would very much appreciate your feedback for you have a truly scholarly approach.

    Read More
  110. schmenz says:
    @Huggbear
    As an Anglican Christian I was brought up never to understand the Catholics. In my latter years I have come to understand what a vast repository of "ideals" and "intellectual chiseling" the Catholic Church has undergone over the centuries and how "right" it is on many of the ideals.

    Can I say how much I enjoyed your ditty which summarised exactly my present feelings and even explained the reason for celibacy.

    Everywhere it seems, Rome is no exception, we see the clash of the ideals of Jesus ( PBUH) and the those rather nasty Jewish Pharisees. Whether Church or Geopolitics the Power of Mammon and its nefarious influences subverting and perverting.

    Can Catholicism ever recover from Vatican 11 ?

    Not it would seem without a major Revolution - that is never going to happen with this Pope .

    Catholicism recovered after the Arian heresy of the 4th century so it will recover after the desolation brought on by the Modernists. Whether we will live to see their defeat is another matter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Huggbear
    Funny you should say that as this morning I tuned into THE SAVAGE NATION and was surprised to hear that Michael Savage spent quite a few minutes of air time predicting a resurgence of Christianity in the US?

    The reaction to the Modernists is apparently already underway in the households of America.

    Maybe you are right.
    , @Huggbear
    Bishop Richard Williamson is the MAN to listen to!
  111. trump is a run-of-the-mill president like most that have gone before him. a political coward. he said: get out of nato – nope. he said get out of afghanistan – nope. he said get out of syria – nope. he said fix the infrastructure – nope.
    he’s just another in long line of bums.
    just another huckster.
    don’t be fooled

    Read More
  112. Huggbear says:

    My Amazon search reveals that no such book is stocked – I wonder if you have the ISBN?

    Zahi Hawass apparently found the tomb of Osiris down a well a year of so back and the Americans found Gilgamesh AKA Nimrod when Iraq was invaded. Both of these stories have not been developed and we await developments. Same deal for the “Hall of Records” under the Sphinx.

    Seems there is still much to come out

    Would be interested in reading this book if I can procure a copy.

    As for scholarly approach – no I am just imbued with a curiosity about the world that often gets me into trouble and the time and money to explore.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
    I did procure a kindle copy of this book from Amazon though I had to change my e mail from its original address in a Muslim country to another address as the downloading of the book was not allowed in the country of my original e mail.
    May be you should try a Google search about Asraf Ezzat books and that should do the job.
    It is a highly recommended book that by and large got a five stars assessment except from Isreali readers who obviously thought it negates the Raison D'être of Isreal.
  113. Huggbear says:
    @schmenz
    Catholicism recovered after the Arian heresy of the 4th century so it will recover after the desolation brought on by the Modernists. Whether we will live to see their defeat is another matter.

    Funny you should say that as this morning I tuned into THE SAVAGE NATION and was surprised to hear that Michael Savage spent quite a few minutes of air time predicting a resurgence of Christianity in the US?

    The reaction to the Modernists is apparently already underway in the households of America.

    Maybe you are right.

    Read More
  114. Che Guava says:
    @Jake
    Your friend is at best a lazy idiot.

    Latin must be at the center of saving Western Civilization.

    I agree in part, she is not an idiot, has a simplistic Marian-centred faith, she will ask me, in Japanese Do you not love Mary?’

    My answer, sure, but parts of the RC teaching on that go far into the realm of confection.

    I don’t say to my friend that the ‘visions’ of Fatima, the associated ‘Immaculate Heart’ and the extension to ‘conversion’ of Russia had and have a clear geopolitical purpose, though it is true, long may the Orthodox be free of the Bishop of Roma, particularly this one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nickels
    I think the Greek Orthodox and the Russian Orthodox churches in America have the right idea:

    The Greek (or Slavic) text is on one page, the english version on the other.

    The presentation of the liturgy goes mostly in English but with some parts in the native language.

    The main point is that the full liturgy is still there, as opposed to tossed in the garbage like the post VII liturgy.
  115. nickels says:
    @Che Guava
    I agree in part, she is not an idiot, has a simplistic Marian-centred faith, she will ask me, in Japanese Do you not love Mary?'

    My answer, sure, but parts of the RC teaching on that go far into the realm of confection.

    I don't say to my friend that the 'visions' of Fatima, the associated 'Immaculate Heart' and the extension to 'conversion' of Russia had and have a clear geopolitical purpose, though it is true, long may the Orthodox be free of the Bishop of Roma, particularly this one.

    I think the Greek Orthodox and the Russian Orthodox churches in America have the right idea:

    The Greek (or Slavic) text is on one page, the english version on the other.

    The presentation of the liturgy goes mostly in English but with some parts in the native language.

    The main point is that the full liturgy is still there, as opposed to tossed in the garbage like the post VII liturgy.

    Read More
  116. @Huggbear
    My Amazon search reveals that no such book is stocked - I wonder if you have the ISBN?

    Zahi Hawass apparently found the tomb of Osiris down a well a year of so back and the Americans found Gilgamesh AKA Nimrod when Iraq was invaded. Both of these stories have not been developed and we await developments. Same deal for the "Hall of Records" under the Sphinx.

    Seems there is still much to come out

    Would be interested in reading this book if I can procure a copy.

    As for scholarly approach - no I am just imbued with a curiosity about the world that often gets me into trouble and the time and money to explore.

    I did procure a kindle copy of this book from Amazon though I had to change my e mail from its original address in a Muslim country to another address as the downloading of the book was not allowed in the country of my original e mail.
    May be you should try a Google search about Asraf Ezzat books and that should do the job.
    It is a highly recommended book that by and large got a five stars assessment except from Isreali readers who obviously thought it negates the Raison D’être of Isreal.

    Read More
  117. Osten says:

    American people need truth about Charlottesville.
    If they see film and hear interviews on television and radio of credible witnesses they will change their opinions of news media representations.
    Samizdat worked in Russia to help people learn and see.
    That can work in USA.

    Read More
  118. Huggbear says:
    @schmenz
    Catholicism recovered after the Arian heresy of the 4th century so it will recover after the desolation brought on by the Modernists. Whether we will live to see their defeat is another matter.

    Bishop Richard Williamson is the MAN to listen to!

    Read More
  119. Two details, Israel :

    The French revolution was planned by the Rothschilds and carried out by Freemasons, against the will of the French people. The attack on the Bastille (an elite prison known for the supreme quality of its food) was carried out by hired scum brought in from Marseille (at 776 km). When jewish boot makers, saddle makers and such were butchering catholic priests in Paris, the revolutionary army had to protect them against the fury of the people of Paris. This was NOT a real revolution of the people.

    The Russian revolution was also planned by the Rothschilds and carried out by emigré Jews from lower east side Manhatten, who hardly spoke Russian. Banker Schiff spent 20 million USD (or so) on this revolution and had – of course – a fantastic return on his investment : a trainload of gold. This was not a real revolution of the people either.

    Read More
  120. Veritatis says:
    @Che Guava
    Thank you.

    I know of the Society of Saint Pius the Tenth, and the writing of Pope Pious X agaiinst theological modernism is very good, prophetic beyond theology. Posting a link if you don't know.

    Used to live near their HQ in Tokyo. They don't seem to hold Mass anywhere. Well, very occasionally. Maybe.

    I complain about the lack of latin at Mass, my friend very sensibly replies 'Nobody is undestanding it. '
    Read More
  121. ussr andy says:

    It is easier to turn the racism weapon against the adversary, for the Jewish adversary of Trump is as racist as any KKK member is likely to be, or worse. Last week it became known, that in Israel, Jewish settlers established a road sign saying:

    As so often, Shamir aimed at American globalists but hit Israel. And not just Israel but the Israeli analog of Southern rednecks. Why?

    Read More
  122. Pete22 says:
    @Jake
    I know nothing about Shamir as Bolshevik apologist. I know he stresses the horrors the Nazis committed in Eastern Europe, which were ended only by advancing Soviet troops.

    I do know this: there are only two things that could cause decent, common sense folk to give a thought to post-Trotskyite Marxism (meaning, Marxism no longer focused on being a Jewish arm of genocide aimed at white cultures). 1 is resurgent and well armed Islam. The other is the EWASP-Jewish alliance.

    The British WASPs and now the AmericanWASPs have done both.

    Can you point out these communities of WASPS, on par with Jewish communities in size and ethnopolitical coherence (or even recognizable as ethnopolitically coherent whatsoever), who have supposedly allied themselves with Jews and thus who would supposedly enjoy the same political advantages that Jews enjoy?

    Thought not.

    Where are they? Not in NYC. Not in Chicago. Not in LA. Not in San Francisco. Where are they hiding? In Burlington, Vermont? That’s a long commute to exercise the power that is always incubated at the prole community level (see Jews). A few WASPS at the end of hidden driveways don’t constitute a measurable political group who can do anything in regard to supporting the continuance of Anglos, even in the upper class.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Israel Shamir Comments via RSS