The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIsrael Shamir Archive
The Messiah in England
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_608993741

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

No, the freshly-minted British Duchess of Sussex, Meghan is not Jewish. She’s been married to a Jewish producer (@hertoo!), this is the nearest. Still, the cry Messiah is here! sounded in the British Jewish community, for they had a great run of success. They proved at court that a dead Jew is better than a dead Englishman, and that you have to discriminate in favour of a Jew. Another feat in the Kingdom of the Jewish Messiah!

The hunt for anti-Semites eclipsed the foxhunt in the category of blood sports. Ken Livingstone, a very popular ex-Mayor of London, lifelong Labour political activist, has been expelled out of Labour for his anti-Israeli views, deemed “antisemitic”. This is a big victory in a wider campaign against Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour leader, carried out by Friends of Israel, for Corbyn is a determined anti-Zionist with a long record of support for Palestinians and for other Resistance movements.

He is also for repairing relations with Russia, and the BBC played it up presenting him in a Russian winter hat against a Russian church background, to show for sure that he is a Russian agent. His son Tommy ‘liked’ a Facebook link to a piece of mine on a Palestinian site, and this was duly recorded as a proof of his father’s antisemitic tendency.

Livingstone is a jolly, hard-boiled, outspoken and very popular fellow, a real asset for Corbyn’s Labour. Thus Corbyn repeated the original error of Donald Trump who also agreed to drop his best supporters after they were accused of breaking PC rules and of antisemitism.

Organised Jewry hates Corbyn and Livingstone not only for their stand on Israel/Palestine; it is an indicator of policy. Organised Jewry, as opposed to ordinary accidental Jews, is a political body acting against the working people of England and for themselves, that is for the landlords and the moneybags. Usually they vote Conservative, and if they support Labour, they bend it in a Blairite mode. Blairite Labour is a pro-Jewish Labour, Conservative Lite. Blair took the UK into the Iraqi War and added to the destruction of the British working class that was launched by the Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher.

Now Corbyn and Livingstone are definitely no Blairites. They are against wars, against NATO, against selling arms to Israel and Saudi Arabia. Corbyn was the rare voice of reason during the Skripal madness. That’s why Organised Jewry wants to get rid of him; and antisemitism is their weapon of choice.

When Corbyn is subdued, the Cold War with Russia will become colder, much colder – if not very hot, by the way of dialectics. More Yemenis and Palestinians will be killed by British weapons, and British money will go to nuclear rearmament, instead of health services. It is very sad Corbyn allowed them to remove Livingstone; he lost an ally and he showed a sign of weakness.

Not the first one. Corbyn is weak on Jews, this is his Achilles Heel. Jeremy Corbyn agreed that dead Englishmen are inferior to dead Jews, and this is worse than Livingstone’s departure. (Let us add for balance’ sake, that this is the law of the realm, too.)

In England, dead bodies are released for burial by the coroner, and his permission usually takes time. The Jews do not want to wait with the commoners even after death. They demand to be buried right away, while non-Jews may have to wait for a week or longer. Many coroners just do it, but the obstinate coroner for progressive inner North London, a certain Ms Mary Hassel, decided to operate on ‘first come, first serve’ basis. In her own words, “no death will be prioritised in any way over any other”. For her, a dead Jew has no priority before an Englishman on his way to the cemetery. It sounds fair, sort of “all are equal in front of the Grim Reaper”, but such equality is against Jewish tradition.

The Jewish law postulates that a dog is better than a goy. This was stated by the leading authority, Rashi (Rabbi Shlomo Itzhaki, the 11th century exegete) in his commentary to Exodus 22:30. A dog is to be preferred over a goy, said he in discussing the proper way to dispose of non-kosher meat. Here is the original with a modern Jewish translation into English. The translation softens the message by adding “to be given preference in this respect” where the original has the brutal “dog is better than him [a goy]”. The translation offers “heathen”, where the original has straightforward “goy”. With such an attitude, it is obvious that the Jews should not mind overtaking non-Jews in the line to the coroner.

Now the story takes an unbelievable turn. The Jews sued Mary Hassel, and won. Not in Israel, not in a Jewish state, but in England. The High Court ruled a coroner must consider Jewish sensitivities. If they do not want to wait, do not cause them grief by waiting – it is “unlawful, irrational and discriminatory” to refuse to discriminate in favour of Jews. This mind-boggling (and in my view extremely offensive to an ordinary mortal goy who has to wait for weeks to get released for burial) decision has been made by a Lord Justice Singh, and lauded by Lord Mayor Sadiq Khan.

One could mumble something about Indians who import their caste ideas into fair England, but there was no rush by native judges to overrule Singh. And unfortunately Jeremy Corbyn approved of the decision, saying: “The High Court ruling is very welcome and will be a huge relief to the Jews who have suffered significant and unnecessary anxiety.” Even worse: before the matter went to the High Court, Jeremy Corbyn wrote to Hassel demanding that she reconsider.

ORDER IT NOW

Perhaps they were right? The Jews say that urgent burial is a religious duty. It is true, but so is the killing of a baptised Jew like me; it is a religious duty to kill such an apostate even on Yom Kippur, but Jews usually manage without fulfilling this obligation. On a milder note, a Jew is prohibited from eating bread baked by a non-Jew (פתנוכרי), but the vast majority of Jews transgress this prohibition. There are hundreds of Jewish laws and prohibitions that Jews do not observe if they can’t be fulfilled.

It is possible to offset this requirement of the Jewish law by another, keeping peace with neighbours (דרכישלום), as obviously getting in front of the line and bypassing your neighbours is disturbing peaceful relations with them.

The Jews say that they do it for the Muslims’ sake. Somehow Mary Hassel was taken to Court by Jews, not by Muslims. Jews often use Muslims for an alibi: instead of saying “we do not want to see a Christmas tree” or “we don’t want to hear church bells”, they say: it is offensive for Muslims. It is offensive for Muslims to be locked up in Gaza, but Jews do not mind causing that offence. So this elaboration is just an exercise in futility.

Jeremy Corbyn, a man who tried to please the Jews, is a sitting duck for antisemite hunters. I do not intend to criticise him, for he is a politician who operates in an England blessed with such a High Court, such a Parliament and such a corporate media.

Nothing is going to help him, nothing is going to help the British people, until they will free themselves from this Jewish fiefdom.

Despite his efforts to please, on a popular New World Order TV show, leftish Frankie Boyle attacked Corbyn for an “antisemitism crisis” – in the week the Jews committed the Gaza Massacre. Her obscene action had been analysed and found disgraceful by the wonderful British journalist, a resident in Nazareth, the city of Annunciation, Jonathan Cook. He wrote: “The very week when Palestinians need full-throated support, and Israel full-throated condemnation, you trotted out stale and bogus allegations of an antisemitism “crisis” in Labour precisely designed (whether you understand it or not) to foreclose criticism of Israel. That is a betrayal of the Palestinian people in their time of need”.

It is also a betrayal of the British people – or should we say, ushering them into the Kingdom of the Jewish Messiah?

 

P.S. Today, at the date of publication of this piece (what a stunning coincidence!), a new great step of the Jewish Messiah has been heard in England. A woman singer has been convicted of mocking Elie Wiezel etc. The judge said she will go to prison; actual sentencing is in a month.

Jewish Chronicle reported that

“Alison Chabloz, of Derbyshire, was convicted [for] Chabloz mocked Jewish figures, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel, as well as Anne and Otto Frank, to the tune of Hava Nagila. District Judge John Zani said he was “entirely satisfied” that the material was “grossly offensive”, and that it was intended to insult Jewish people. The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said: “Essentially this is a ruling on the legality of Holocaust denial and antisemitic conspiracy theories in the UK. This is about where the line lies between free speech and dangerous antisemitic incitement”.

Thus England within a few years went from God save the Queen//the Fascist regime being permitted and lèse-majesté de-criminalised — to an artist being sent to jail for (((survivors))) and lèse-majesté restored to the Penal Code books. It is the majeste that changed, it departed from the Windsor, king of goyim, to the Messiah, king of the Jews, after some 70 years of interregnum when you could freely mock both; the freest years England knew, when the old order had collapsed and was no longer enforced and the new order was not yet enforced.

Israel Shamir can be reached at [email protected]

This article was first published at The Unz Review.

 
Hide 130 CommentsLeave a Comment
130 Comments to "The Messiah in England"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:

    New Germany and the future vision of Europe.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    , @deschutes
  2. Ma Laoshi says:

    I could never agree with Shamir’s bolshevist nostalgia, and I don’t understand how it can coexist with his other views since bolshevism involved a lot of abuse of jewish power. But oh boy does he get the jews. Perhaps he could have a word with Putin about where appeasing jews gets you?

    • Replies: @Israel Shamir
  3. @Ma Laoshi

    bolshevism involved a lot of abuse of jewish power

    so much of Jewish Power that there was just one Jew in the government (deputy minister) and zero in Politburo the last ten years of Bolshevik rule.

  4. @ Shamir:

    once the (((communist))) tyranny in Russia was firmly in place (and “anti-semitism” declared a capital crime) the Jews – with a little help from Stalin – faded somewhat into the background.

    one also notices that, when (((communism))) in Russia finally collapsed, most of the Jews made a quick Exodus to Zion-in-Palestine and then on to greener pasture$.

    • Replies: @Wally
  5. utu says:
    @Israel Shamir

    With the creation of Israel and ascendance of Jews in the US the USSR was no longer of much use to the Jews. USSR by having client states like Iraq, Syria, Libya and Egypt till 1980 in the ME who were all thread to Israel became de facto an enemy of the Jews. One may wonder whether USSR would last longer or the Cold War had different trajectory if Israel was not created.

    • Replies: @bjondo
  6. j says: • Website

    The things one learns reading this senile meshumad (converted Christian)! The English let their dead to rot for weeks? Really? And the Zio-Fascist dictatorship forced them grant preposterous privileges like burying their dead raw and un-chilled. I wonder if the Parsis, whose religion direct them to recycle and feed their dead to vultures, enjoy the same privileges in England. And what about the Fijian cannibals?

    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
  7. “One could mumble something about Indians who import their caste ideas into fair England, but there was no rush by native judges to overrule Singh. And unfortunately Jeremy Corbyn approved of the decision, saying: “The High Court ruling is very welcome and will be a huge relief to the Jews who have suffered significant and unnecessary anxiety.”

    That is a stunning policy reversal. And it explains why, assimilation is a must. And by assimilation, one must forgo there old national beliefs and practices for the new.

    That is a bizarre ruling.

  8. Gordo says:

    Free speech has ceased to exist in the UK.

    So obvious now that all the wars were fought not for freedom but for the money power.

    All our ‘leaders’ bought and paid for. Or worse.

    • Replies: @Anon
  9. Ron T says:

    I do not like the use of “Jews”. Even if 99% of Jews are Zionists, we should not generalize, just like one righteous person in Sodom may spare the city from divine retribution. Here is a wonderful doc about Neturei Karta, in the same city of London, who march three and a half hours on a Sabbath to express solidarity with Palestinians. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKplabTRuak (if you discount the Vice presenter’s obvious inherent bias).

    Also, it is foolish of Zionist Jewish leadership to make the election of Corbyn a referendum on Jewish Power, a referendum that they may lose. Indeed, their bloodlust and insistence on complete control over the discourse may backfire. Just like their co-religionists in Israel who have marked Iran for destruction, they have drawn a red line and are now engaged in a full frontal assault on the leader of a major political party and a prominent Western state. His crime: he stands for human rights of Palestinians in lieu of cold financial and power considerations, which favor Apartheid Israel. They are in palpable panic, fearing that the election of Corbyn will break the dam and harbinger the turning of the tide against unconditional support for Israel, something that may well spill over to other Western states, which means Zionist Jews losing their privileged status and direct access to world leaders.

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @renfro
  10. Wally says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Curious how those Jews in Russia going to Palestine had been counted as being ‘holocausted’.

    recommended:

    http://juergen-graf.vho.org/articles/hungarian-holocaust-debate.html

    Jews evacuated to USSR during war

    https://archive.is/jA9iI

    and:
    more Jews evacuated to USSR during war
    https://www.jta.org/1944/02/23/archive/german-lauds-russia-for-joining-intergovernmental-committee-for-refugees , exc.:
    “Since the outbreak of the war hundreds of thousands of Jews from Poland, Rumania and the Baltic countries have been given shelter in the U.S.S.R., and many of them were permitted to pass through Russia en route to the United States and to Palestine.”

    http://www.codoh.com

  11. Realist says:

    Everybody gets a ride on the English bum….Jews, Hindus, Muslims, Blacks.

    • Replies: @Dagon Shield
  12. CalDre says:
    @Israel Shamir

    Stalin purged a lot of the Jews. And at that point Bolshevism became Stalinism. After even more Jew purging, Stalinism became Communism, and at some point, it actually became not such a bad system.

    But Bolshevism – when the Jews ruled Russia – greatest evil the world has ever faced. We have two modern day examples of Jewish rule – Bolshevism and Zionism. Both systems prove beyond any doubt the virulent, violent racism, hatred, murdering and genocide that Jews aspire to. And celebrate as it is being accomplished.

    Even worse than Stalinism, which itself runs a close race, but Stalin’ s crimes were less genocide (although often, including in treatment of the Tatars and Chechens, entirely racist – but at least he didn’t murder them all and burn down their mosques, as the Bolsheviks did).

    • Agree: ohmy, L.K, snag
    • Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy
    , @Ivan
  13. El Dato says:
    @Anon

    That feed has some good stuff, some fake stuff but definitely bluepills on Israel.

  14. renfro says:
    @Ron T

    I do not like the use of “Jews”. Even if 99% of Jews are Zionists, we should not generalize, just like one righteous person in Sodom may spare the city from divine retribution.

    So you said before but I still disagree even though I recognize not all Jews are Zionist .
    ‘The Jews” need to feel the pressure and the fear ….at which point they will have two choices—to either mount their own very public and political campaign against the Jewish/Israeli Fifth Column in the US …..or to run to Israel or elsewhere.
    Either would suffice for the purpose of getting Israel out of our government.

    • Replies: @Iris
  15. Wally says:

    “The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said: “Essentially this is a ruling on the legality of Holocaust denial and antisemitic conspiracy theories in the UK. This is about where the line lies between free speech and dangerous antisemitic incitement”.”

    Only when it comes to the fake & impossible ’6M Jews & gas chambers’ is free speech considered “dangerous”. But dangerous to what? The biggest, most profitable fraud the world has ever seen, that’s what. Those that have and do profit mightily are clinging by their fingernails … it is THEY who are truly “dangerous”.

    Nothing changes until the impossible and easily debunked ‘holocaust’ narrative is openly discussed and ridiculed. I know it, you know it. It is the soft underbelly of all that’s gone wrong in The West. Get off of your knees. Only liars demand censorship.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    must reading:
    Dissecting the Holocaust. The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory”
    By Germar Rudolf

    https://codoh.com/library/series/918/?lang=en

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    • Replies: @ohmy
  16. cezanne says:

    Assimilation is a pipe dream. White people used to have a similar culture which allowed them to assimilate, thus the word. However when you add to the mix Africans, mudslimes and jews, there intransigent stance against our culture will never allow them to assimilate. Thus we see these “folks” demanding rights that none of our forebears ever even requested. Redress for grievances give me a break, you and your kind are fucked always will be and do not belong in an assimilatable society.

  17. EagleEyeX says:

    I feel for this woman Chabloz going to the dock because she ridiculed this exposed fraud Wiesel. This type of fiasco is the real crime in today’s world of mass denial.
    And Corbyn will cave further if he is miraculously elected …….just one person of his position and prestige that puts the foot down in the UK or US to this outrageous calamity is enough to start a paradigm shift.
    I am sure that the Chinese are just standing by and watching this knowing that the whole house of cards will eventually fall because of arrogance and hubris of this “special” race.
    Russia seems to be enough in it to not be able to withstand it’s eventual consuming of her also. It is a virus ……tolerating it will not make it go away.

    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
  18. Steve F says:
    @Israel Shamir

    how about the first ten?

    • Replies: @Wally
  19. Meester Shamir, how exactly did Margaret Thatcher accelerate the decline of the Working Class?

    • Replies: @Iris
  20. The hunt for anti-Semites eclipsed the foxhunt in the category of blood sports.

    That’s because, in today’s England, fox hunting is illegal, whereas hunting ‘anti-semites’ is the law.

  21. @j

    I wonder if the Parsis, whose religion direct them to recycle and feed their dead to vultures, enjoy the same privileges in England. And what about the Fijian cannibals?

    Obviously, the Parsees and the Fijian cannibals don’t have much of a lobby!

    • Replies: @Dagon Shield
  22. Zionists control Britain and the U.S. and Germany and France and in fact all of Europe and so with this control mainly via the central banks , as those who control the money control everything and this is one of the 10 planks of the communist manifesto, and so Zionists rule as laid out in The Protocols of Zion, and that is a fact.

    In regards to Russia the Zionists were about 90% of the Soviet gov and these Zionist murdered some 60 million Russians over the course of 1917 to 1953 and this can be checked in The Gulag Archipelago by Solzhenitsyn, and by the way this is what we have to look forward to here in America if they get our guns.

    If interested , read the 10 planks to see where America is at in the road to a complete communist take over.

  23. Jake says:

    There are going to be all kinds of naive folks who read this – the kind who used to make smart aleck comments on my posts and how now ignore them – who will be stunned at any of this. After all, the ‘Jewish problem’ surely is only because Americans foolishly felt triple sorrow for Jews after Hitler and the Nazis, and then Jews used Hollywood to take over the US, and acting in ways that are antithetical to WASP culture.

    WASP culture is the direct product of a Judaizing heresy (Anglo-Saxon Puritanism) that delivered the death blows to the Norman, Celtic fringe, and catholic parts of earlier English culture, producing something rather new, but with much of its newness perhaps best seen as a revival of pagan west Germanic culture overlaid with Judaizing Protestantism. A Judaizing heresy always produces pro-Jewish politics and culture.

    Archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell made concrete that the new WASP culture saw itself as BFF with Jews. Cromwell – a man the ‘conservative’ Anglophiles like Brimelow, Derbyshire, and a host of pro-Neocon WASPs – hold up as exemplar – made concrete the WASP-Jewish alliance. Cromwell took Jewish loans and allowed Jews back into England, with special rights and privileges.

    And Cromwell took Jewish money precisely to keep waging war to slaughter white Christians and deliver death blows top their languages and local cultures.

    From the first generation of WASPs to grab control of the London government, WASP leaders have allied with Jews against the vast majority of white Christians.

    You cannot separate the Jewish problem in the Modern world from the WASP problem. You cannot solve the Jewish problem without also solving the WASP problem.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @renfro
  24. j says: • Website

    Mr Shamir’s bizarre observation that the traditional Jewish burial is an offense in Great Britain, so I consulted the wiki and found that no such law exists. The offenses arising out of the use of a dead body include:

    Detaining a body
    Refusing to deliver it to the executors for burial
    Conspiring to prevent a lawful and decent burial
    Disposing of the body to prevent an inquest
    Selling the body for dissection
    Exposing the body in a public place if to do so would shock public decency

    Parsis and Fijians too could follow their traditional disposal customs without legal problems in England. My conclusion is that Mr Shamir has some cognitive issue as consequence of age and disease. May be his conscience is driving him crazy for abandoning his ancestor’s faith.

  25. @CalDre

    “Both systems prove beyond any doubt the virulent, violent racism, hatred, murdering and genocide that Jews aspire to. And celebrate as it is being accomplished.“

    This was proved long before that, during the Kitos war around 100 AD.

    http://sword-site.com/thread/1344/kitos-genocide-probably-never-heard

    The Romans knew what was up with these people.

    • Replies: @CalDre
  26. Please do not mention the last seventy years in England, a long day’s journey into night.

    • Replies: @ohmy
  27. As we all know “repairing relations with Russia” is Orwellian for “capitulate to Putin in Ukraine”. I have never seen anything that suggests that Corbyn is particularly favourable to Russia and the author provides no support for his claim. Tha main point is, though, that all this has to do with Brexit, not Russia or Israel or the Jews. May plans to hold an election which will be, according to her, a referendum on the exit package. Corbyn very nearly won the last election and if he wins the next one, it will be seen as a rejection of Brexit. Thus, the various attempts to discredit him. However, few people in Britain care a hoot about Israel or the Jews, one way or the other. Thus, at worst, trying to brand Corbyn as an “anti-Semite” will do him no harm and at best, it will be seen as Jewish bullying and will actually help him.

  28. escobar says:

    I would like Israel Shamir to share his thoughts on this: As an “accidental” and fallen away Jew (refugee from Vienna in 1938) my experience with a substantial number of American Jews has shown them as embodiment of those Nazi posters: money-worshiping, mean-spirited, sly, treacherous, greedy, dishonest and lacking even a sliver of empathy, compassion or decency. And not just in dealing with the “dread” goyim, but with fellow Jews who stand between them and money and power to be gained. I found this not just among the Orthodox, but Ashkenazim Jews who attended Harvard or Princeton, where none of that humanistic good stuff (from Kant to Camus) took a place in their inner lives and their behavior. Have you written about how and why these attitudes and behaviors did not diminish or disappear in America, where no Cossacks or Nazis prevented them from”making it”?
    Have you written about that? Has anyone done a fair and perceptive article or book about it? Thanks.

    • Replies: @Iris
    , @Israel Shamir
    , @utu
  29. deschutes says:
    @Anon

    What a fucking bore you are, with your little video of a black guy dancing. Go cry me a river you white racist douchebag.

  30. ohmy says:
    @Wally

    Wally has the correct view. The idea that 6 million Jews died in an holocaust defies logic. The entire Jewish population in Germany pre WW2 is said to be 500,000. Yes, one has to consider the Jewish population in the neighboring countries also so for the historical answer I turned to the American Jewish Committee, and the Jewish Statistical Bureau of the Synagogue Council of America. In 1938 it published a census titled “Jewish People Here and Abroad”. According to the organization’s research in 1938 in Europe there were 8,o39,608 Jews. If between then and 1945 6 million perished, we’re left with 2 million. Without considering some factors, there should be 2 million Jews remaining in Europe at the end of WW2. In 1948 the same group published a census showing a Jewish population in Europe of 9,372,668. Does this raise an eyebrow? Personally, I don’t have to be a math genius to understand something smells fishy, and it ain’t a fish. Even if we assume annual birth rates weren’t negatively affected by war there is no way that a decimated population recovers at such an impossible rate. Either the holocaust did not happen as advertised or, the census for the years mentioned titled “Jewish People Here and Abroad” is garbage. However, many arguments can be offered as there are widely disparate opinions as to how many Jews were in preWW2 Europe. If we look to answers.com for help we find that in all of Nazi occupied Europe in the year 1939 there were only 2.5 million Jews. Either that nasty and, evil genius, Adolf was advertising Jews wanted or, he killed every Jew 3 times. Go figure.

    • Agree: Moi
    • Replies: @Moi
    , @Momus
    , @j2
  31. Wally says:

    So what’s wrong with the “little video of a black guy dancing”.

    After all, he was dancing and no one forced him to.

  32. ohmy says:
    @quasi_verbatim

    Ah, you quote Celine. One of my favorite authors.

    • Replies: @Iris
  33. renfro says:
    @Jake

    I don’t know what kind of nut case you are but your craziness in this Cromwell-WASP- and Jews needs to be corrected by some real history……at least for the benefits of others who read here.

    First off, Cromwell wasn’t a WASP by todays definitions.
    Second, Cromwell himself was a nut case. He suffered from severe bouts of depression and during one of those bouts he seized on religion as a cure for his mental angst. He became what would be called today a ‘born again or evangelical’. He said that God spoke to him and directed him in his battles. He actually called himself a ‘Moses Puritan. He waged war against Episcopacy and Catholism alike .

    As for your delusion that Cromwell somehow set up a partnership with the Jews in which they and the WASP would rule the world—-never happened.

    What did happen was that Cromwell was approached by a Amsterdam Jew asking that Jews be permitted to live once again in England. Cromwell looked favorably on this mainly because of his religious fanaticism. Cromwell wanted to allow the Jews to return to England in the hope that they would convert to Christianity and therefore hasten the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Secondly, Cromwell thought admitting the Jews would bring some need revenue to England. otoh the Jew merchants were more practical, they saw this as a opportunity to colonize British trade thru their world wide contacts with Jews in other lands.

    Cromwell convened a conference at Whitehall in 1655–where he talked about the need to send Christian preachers to the Jews. William Prynne the Presbyterian leader (an actual WASP) in contrast to Cromwell the evangelical was strongly opposed to the latter’s pro-Jewish policy.

    And the Jews were not re-admitted….they sort of dribbled back in over a period of time.
    Cromwells contribution as far as the Jews went was to remove some restrictions on the small population of Jews already in England.

    For Cromwells efforts in England his body was exhumed from Westminster Abbey in 1661 and was subjected to a posthumous execution. His disinterred body was hanged in chains and Cromwell’s severed head was displayed on a pole outside Westminster Hall until 1685.

    As Eliane Glaser wrote in the Financial Times:
    Did Cromwell Readmit Jews To England? Seems Not
    ”Imagine how odd it would be to discover that anniversaries were based on nothing more than an enduring, but utterly inaccurate, myth. Yet that is precisely what is happening in Britain this year where events are about to get under way to mark the 350th anniversary of the “readmission” of Jews under Oliver Cromwell. Britain’s oldest synagogue will hold a commemorative service in June; [London mayor] Ken Livingstone’s office hopes to erect a huge menorah in Trafalgar Square; the Arts Council has funded a new play; and there are plans for events at Tate Modern and the Royal Society.
    The only trouble is, Cromwell didn’t allow the Jews to return in 1656.
    In fact, as I discovered long ago when researching a doctorate in 17th-century religious history, the supposedly historic event of readmission and resettlement was nothing of the kind.
    What is true is this: in the Middle Ages, a deeply anti-Semitic England became the first country in the world to expel Jews. In 1655, a Jewish leader from Amsterdam, Menasseh ben Israel, came to England to try to persuade Cromwell to let the Jews return. In December that year, Cromwell held a conference of merchants, lawyers and theologians in Whitehall to discuss the proposal. A few were in favor – many Jews were well connected merchants, after all. Furthermore, according to an eccentric millenarian prophecy then circulating, conversion of the Jews might hasten Christ’s second coming.
    In the end, though, the Whitehall conference rejected the proposal. There was no great desire to welcome the Jewish people back from Europe.
    A few hundred Jews did arrive in the second half of the 17th century, but their numbers paled in comparison with the more than 50,000 Huguenot immigrants who moved here in the same period, and the order of expulsion was never revoked.…
    If you had been listening to Radio 4’s “Thought for the Day” last December however, you would have heard Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks give a different version of events: “In the Middle Ages, Britain led the world in its hostility to Jews, and in 1290 became the first country to expel them,” he said. “But in one of the great reversals of all time, in the 17th century it led the world in tolerance. Jews came back to Britain in 1656, and in a few weeks time will begin celebrating the 350th anniversary of that event.”
    When I first attempted to interview the Chief Rabbi for this article, the executive director of his office, Syma Weinberg, told me that I should first read some books on the subject. I told her that I had actually read them all, and had written one myself.
    Finally, after several days and many phone calls, I received a call from the Chief Rabbi. I put it to him that the readmission story was not what it was cracked up to be.
    “You’re right – “Technically there was no moment at which you could say Jews were readmitted.”…
    But what of Sacks’s earlier claim that the readmission was “one of the great reversals of all time”? Either something happened, or it didn’t.…
    Unlike Sacks, I regard the informal nature of British tolerance as a sign of reluctance rather than affable accommodation. The Jews were not readmitted to England in 1656; a bill to give them equal rights was repealed in 1754, and they were only permitted to sit in parliament without taking an Anglican oath in 1858, after 11 years of debate.
    Challenging the traditional faith in British tolerance is a better way of acknowledging true religious diversity than celebrating an event that didn’t happen”

    This myth has been address again and again and it is mostly Jews who want to propagate the myth for whatever reason….maybe wishful thinking that Jews were once accepted in England during an era when they really weren’t.’

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/dec/09/religion.uk

    https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/1655-cromwell-conference-on-letting-jews-back-into-england-fizzles-out-1.5474357

    If you had read any creditable works and accounts such as these you would know the real story.
    Christopher Hill, -God’s Englishman: Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution,
    John Morrill, – “The Making of Oliver Cromwell”,
    Carlyle, Thomas – “Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches II: Letters from Ireland
    (particularly this one which reveals his religious delusions).

    https://books.google.com/books?id=SvQoAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA128&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false

    Mark Levene – Genocide in the Age of the Nation State
    (And this one about his religiously inspired genocide of Ireland and Scotland.)

    • Replies: @Anon
  34. Anon[246] • Disclaimer says:

    @ the freest years England knew, when the old order had collapsed and was no longer enforced and the new order was not yet enforced.

    Very perceptive comment.

    The article, a fine piece of writing, it made my blood boil, and I try to stay nuanced on “the jews”.

    So, is there a link between jews and lgbt-ers, because those are holy and chosen too. As is the family, is the person; as is the person is the society.

  35. In MY research, I’ve discovered that practically EVERY important historical point regarding the so-called (really COUNTERFEIT) “Jews” is based on LIES.

    “LUKE 8:17 For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.”

    WHY do I call them COUNTERFEIT “Jews”? Read on to find out.

    Listen. We have been MASSIVELY DECEIVED regarding the TRUE identity of the so-called “Jews”. (10% “Sephardi”, 90% “Ashkenazi”). The 10% of “Jews” who call themselves “Sephardi” “Jews” are of BERBER-ARAB extraction, and their ancestors hailed from N. Africa. The 90% of “Jews” who call themselves “Ashkenazi” “Jews” are of SLAVO-TURKIC extraction, and their ancestors hailed from ancient Khazaria, between the Black & Caspian Seas.

    Read _The Non-Jewish Origins of the Sephardic Jews_, by Paul Wexler. Also, read _The Ashkenazic Jews: A Slavo-Turkic People in Search of a Jewish Identity_, by Paul Wexler. For further info. on this topic, you may also read: 1) THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE, by Arthur Koestler; 2) THE INVENTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE, by Schlomo Sand; 3) THE WANDERING WHO?, by Gilad Atzmon. I don’t know if Paul Wexler is “Jew”-ish, or not, but the other three authors most definitely are (or were) “Jews”. I would also highly recommend you read THE GREAT DECEPTION: SYRIA, BRITAIN AND THE ROMAN CONSPIRACY, by Comyns Beaumont, IF you wish to discover the TRUE GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION of the people, places & events described in both the Old & New Testament. (You see, what these BERBER-ARABS & SLAVO-TURKS did, was HIJACK the very name & identity of the TRUE, ORIGINAL IBERI, or IBRI (Hebrews) of the Old & New Testament era, on their way to HIJACKING the entirety of Western Civilization! When did they do it? 1860 AD.

    Page 3 of the 1980 Jewish Almanac states: “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary [modern] Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”

    Encyclopedia Judaica 1971, Vol 10:23: “Jews began to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860 [AD].”

    Also, it has been proven, beyond any reasonable doubt, that Judaism is NOT the religion of MOSES.  Read THE TALMUD TESTED: A Comparison of the Principles and Doctrines of Modern Judaism with the Religion of Moses and the Prophets, by Alexander McCaul.  Did you know that there are NO ancient “Jew”-ish cities that have been archaeologically-excavated in (((Rothschild)))-”Israel” (est. 1948 AD, for the VERY FIRST TIME ~ EVER ~ IN HUMAN HISTORY IN PALESTINE)?  However, there are A LOT of ancient GREEK cities that once existed there. What was the name of that book written by Martin Luther (the founder of the Lutheran Church)? Oh, that’s right. The title of that book was ON THE JEWS AND THEIR LIES. He published that book in 1543 AD. That was 475 years ago. (Anyone seeking to learn more about the “Jews” and their incessant LIES, should read the work of historian Michael A. Hoffman II, at http://www.revisionisthistory.org).

    • Replies: @kai
    , @j
  36. Curle says:

    What about claims that Sephardic crypto-Jews, especially merchants, were allowed in under the Tudors and that these folks made up a non-negligible % of the Armada, privateer and colonization forces?

    The Randolphs, Jefferson’s mother’s family, were part of this crowd and DNA researchers have connected Jefferson to Sephardic blood.

    • Replies: @Anon
  37. Here’s a good movie about England and it’s involvement in WWI and II.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI In the Shadow of Hermes

  38. Hessler says:

    The Nomadic Parasites will shift out of London and into Manhattan. And this will be presented under a camouflage of national slogans. It will be represented as an American victory. It will not be an American victory. Until you know who has lent what to whom, you know nothing whatever of politics, you know nothing whatever of history, you know nothing of international wrangles.—Ezra Pound … “ …

    …. that’s the intro to this book “ THE NEW BABYLON THOSE WHO REIGN SUPREME
    The Rothschild Empire: The Modern-Day Pharisees and the Historical, Religious and Economic Origins of The New World Order “ …
    by Michael Collins Piper … subtitled, … “A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious And Economic Origins of The New World Order “ …

    … click here for the free PDF ebook >>>
    https://ia801302.us.archive.org/17/items/TheNewBabylonThoseThatReignSupreme/MichaelCollinsPiperTheNewBabylon.pdf

    … it’s a good read whenever you feel like taking a break … and perhaps learn about the (((masters))) … those khazarian tribe, from the Pale of Settlement, who plans to control a “New World Order” … where goyim’s only purpose in life is to serve their talmudic masters …

    .. in order to understand what the Talmud is about without reading the massive volumes, here’s a short summary excerpt from the book,
    The New Babylon, pp 61-62 …

    … “ … Dr. Auguste Rohling, a professor at the University of Prague in the late 19th Century was a student of Hebrew and assembled a translation of the Talmud. This is what Rohling described as the basis of the Talmud:

    1) The soul of the Jew is part of God Himself; the souls of the other peoples come from the Devil and resemble those of brutes;

    2) Domination over other peoples is the right of Jews alone;

    3) Awaiting the coming of the Messiah, the Jews live in a con- tinsel state of war with other peoples;

    4) When the victory of the Jews is won, other peoples will accept the Jewish religion; however the Christians will not be given this privilege, but will be exterminated because they belong to the Devil.

    5) The Jew is the substance of God; a Gentile who strikes him deserves death;

    6) Non-Jews are created to serve Jews;

    7) A Jew is forbidden to show mercy to his enemies;

    8) A Jew may be a hypocrite to a non-Jew;

    9) To despoil a non-Jew is permitted;

    10) If anyone returns to a Christian something he has lost, God will not pardon him;

    11) God has ordained that the Jew shall take usury from the non-Jew in order to injure him;

    12) The best of the non-Jews should be exterminated; the honest life of a Gentile should be the object of hate;

    13) If a Jew can deceive a Gentile by pretending to be a non-Jew, he is permitted to do so. … “ …

    … the best part of waking up is opening your eyes …

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  39. Moi says:
    @ohmy

    Although I don’t have the link, I too have come across similar numbers that show there were many more Jews just a few years after WW2 than there were just before the war. Something is indeed fishy.

  40. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hessler

    What asylum are you locked up in? Do you know any Jews well at all? Do you know that most Jews are secular and care nothing for and know nothing about the Talmud? Your sort of ignorant hateful rant is why most accept that they are stuck with being Jews and should make the best of the inevitable.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Hessler
  41. kai says:
    @Just_Sayin'

    try “The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, as a general background, I got it here: http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/reeedcontrov.pdf
    as always, I recommend discretion in accessing web sites where they don’t want you to go; go as stealthily and anonymously as possible.

    Spread the word, the more people who are exposed to the truth, the more people can be brought out of the matrix of deception, and ultimately, the weaker the matrix becomes.

  42. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Preferential treatment for Muslim burials have been around in the UK for about 35 years because of the Muslim requirement of burial within a day of death.

    It meant issuing cell phones to cemetery management and grave diggers back when cell phones were rare and expensive. It meant lots of overtime, evening and Sunday work for grave diggers in Leeds Manchester Bradford and other Muslim colonies.

    It’s interesting. In America A picture of Santa Claus even red and green decorations are a violation of church and state. Even a school break the week after Easter is a violation of church and state.

    But Jews can impose their religious requirements everywhere and it’s not a violation of church and state. Whatever happened to the official established Church of England and its customs and rules?

  43. Read Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. Real human beings dislike “false Jews.” Iran welcomes ordinary Jews but dislikes false Jews, based upon false Jews’ bad behavior.

    • Replies: @Anon
  44. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hessler

    The Ost Jews invaded New York City in 1880 and were in complete control by 1920. No need to move from London to Manhattan.

  45. @Israel Shamir

    Russia and Germany figured out what false Jews were doing to their governments and removed the false Jews from government. The deep state retaliated with the Russian Revolution, WWI, WWII, etc.

    • Replies: @Anon
  46. CalDre says:
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    If you want to go back to the Jews’ days in the ME, they have documented their own numerous genocidal crimes against humanity in their death books worshiping the Beast Yahweh. A number of spots but Deuteronomy and Joshua are good starting points (many examples follow):

    [MORE]

    20 Deuteronomy 10-15: 10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies. 15 This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.

    2 Deuteronomy 32-36: 32 When Sihon and all his army came out to meet us in battle at Jahaz, 33 the Lord our God delivered him over to us and we struck him down, together with his sons and his whole army. 34 At that time we took all his towns and completely destroyed[c] them—men, women and children. We left no survivors. 35 But the livestock and the plunder from the towns we had captured we carried off for ourselves. 36 From Aroer on the rim of the Arnon Gorge, and from the town in the gorge, even as far as Gilead, not one town was too strong for us. The Lord our God gave us all of them.

    3 Deuteronomy 3-7: 3 So the Lord our God delivered into our hands Og also, the king of Bashan, and all his people: and we smote him until none was left to him remaining. 4 And we took all his cities at that time, there was not a city which we took not from them, threescore cities, all the region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan. … 6 And we utterly destroyed them, as we did unto Sihon king of Heshbon, utterly destroying the men, women, and children, of every city. 7 But all the cattle, and the spoil of the cities, we took for a prey to ourselves.

    2 Joahua 10: For we have heard how the Lord dried up the water of the Red sea for you, when ye came out of Egypt; and what ye did unto the two kings of the Amorites, that were on the other side Jordan, Sihon and Og, whom ye utterly destroyed.

    6 Joshua 20-21: 20 So the people shouted when the priests blew with the trumpets: and it came to pass, when the people heard the sound of the trumpet, and the people shouted with a great shout, that the wall fell down flat, so that the people went up into the city, every man straight before him, and they took the city. 21 And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword.

    8 Joshua 18-28: 18 And the Lord said unto Joshua, Stretch out the spear that is in thy hand toward Ai; for I will give it into thine hand. And Joshua stretched out the spear that he had in his hand toward the city. 19 And the ambush arose quickly out of their place, and they ran as soon as he had stretched out his hand: and they entered into the city, and took it, and hasted and set the city on fire. … 21 And when Joshua and all Israel saw that the ambush had taken the city, and that the smoke of the city ascended, then they turned again, and slew the men of Ai. 22 And the other issued out of the city against them; so they were in the midst of Israel, some on this side, and some on that side: and they smote them, so that they let none of them remain or escape. … 25 And so it was, that all that fell that day, both of men and women, were twelve thousand, even all the men of Ai. 26 For Joshua drew not his hand back, wherewith he stretched out the spear, until he had utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai. 27 Only the cattle and the spoil of that city Israel took for a prey unto themselves, according unto the word of the Lord which he commanded Joshua. 28 And Joshua burnt Ai, and made it an heap for ever, even a desolation unto this day.

    9 Joshua 27: [ referring to Joshua's enslavement of several tribes that had surrendered to the Jews ] 27 And Joshua made them that day hewers of wood and drawers of water for the congregation, and for the altar of the Lord, even unto this day, in the place which he should choose.

    10 Joahus 9-31: 9 Joshua therefore came unto them suddenly, and went up from Gilgal all night. 10 And the Lord discomfited [the five kings of the Amorites] before Israel, and slew them with a great slaughter at Gibeon, and chased them along the way that goeth up to Bethhoron, and smote them to Azekah, and unto Makkedah. 11 And it came to pass, as they fled from before Israel, and were in the going down to Bethhoron, that the Lord cast down great stones from heaven upon them unto Azekah, and they died: they were more which died with hailstones than they whom the children of Israel slew with the sword. … 20 And it came to pass, when Joshua and the children of Israel had made an end of slaying them with a very great slaughter, till they were consumed, that the rest which remained of them entered into fenced cities. … 25 And Joshua said unto them, Fear not, nor be dismayed, be strong and of good courage: for thus shall the Lord do to all your enemies against whom ye fight. 26 And afterward Joshua smote [the five kings of the Amorites], and slew them, and hanged them on five trees: and they were hanging upon the trees until the evening. … 28 And that day Joshua took Makkedah, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and the king thereof he utterly destroyed, them, and all the souls that were therein; he let none remain: and he did to the king of Makkedah as he did unto the king of Jericho. 29 Then Joshua passed from Makkedah, and all Israel with him, unto Libnah, and fought against Libnah: 30 And the Lord delivered it also, and the king thereof, into the hand of Israel; and he smote it with the edge of the sword, and all the souls that were therein; he let none remain in it; but did unto the king thereof as he did unto the king of Jericho. 31 And Joshua passed from Libnah, and all Israel with him, unto Lachish, and encamped against it, and fought against it: 32 And the Lord delivered Lachish into the hand of Israel, which took it on the second day, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and all the souls that were therein, according to all that he had done to Libnah. … 34 And from Lachish Joshua passed unto Eglon, and all Israel with him; and they encamped against it, and fought against it: 35 And they took it on that day, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and all the souls that were therein he utterly destroyed that day, according to all that he had done to Lachish. 36 And Joshua went up from Eglon, and all Israel with him, unto Hebron; and they fought against it: 37 And they took it, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and the king thereof, and all the cities thereof, and all the souls that were therein; he left none remaining, according to all that he had done to Eglon; but destroyed it utterly, and all the souls that were therein.

    10 Joshua 33: Then Horam king of Gezer came up to help Lachish; and Joshua smote him and his people, until he had left him none remaining.

    10 Joshua 38-40: 38 And Joshua returned, and all Israel with him, to Debir; and fought against it: 39 And he took it, and the king thereof, and all the cities thereof; and they smote them with the edge of the sword, and utterly destroyed all the souls that were therein; he left none remaining: as he had done to Hebron, so he did to Debir, and to the king thereof; as he had done also to Libnah, and to her king. 40 So Joshua smote all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of the vale, and of the springs, and all their kings: he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed, as the Lord God of Israel commanded.

    11 Joshua 7-14: 7 So Joshua came, and all the people of war with him, against them by the waters of Merom suddenly; and they fell upon them. 8 And the Lord delivered them into the hand of Israel, who smote them, and chased them unto great Zidon, and unto Misrephothmaim, and unto the valley of Mizpeh eastward; and they smote them, until they left them none remaining. … 10 And Joshua at that time turned back, and took Hazor, and smote the king thereof with the sword: for Hazor beforetime was the head of all those kingdoms. 11 And they smote all the souls that were therein with the edge of the sword, utterly destroying them: there was not any left to breathe: and he burnt Hazor with fire. 12 And all the cities of those kings, and all the kings of them, did Joshua take, and smote them with the edge of the sword, and he utterly destroyed them, as Moses the servant of the Lord commanded. … 14 And all the spoil of these cities, and the cattle, the children of Israel took for a prey unto themselves; but every man they smote with the edge of the sword, until they had destroyed them, neither left they any to breathe.

    11 Joshua 17-22: 17 Even from the mount Halak, that goeth up to Seir, even unto Baalgad in the valley of Lebanon under mount Hermon: and all their kings he took, and smote them, and slew them. 18 Joshua made war a long time with all those kings. 19 There was not a city that made peace with the children of Israel, save the Hivites the inhabitants of Gibeon: all other they took in battle. 20 For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts, that they should come against Israel in battle, that he might destroy them utterly, and that they might have no favour, but that he might destroy them, as the Lord commanded Moses. 21 And at that time came Joshua, and cut off the Anakims from the mountains, from Hebron, from Debir, from Anab, and from all the mountains of Judah, and from all the mountains of Israel: Joshua destroyed them utterly with their cities. 22 There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel: only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod, there remained.

    12 Joshua 7-24: 7 And these are the kings of the country which Joshua and the children of Israel smote on this side Jordan on the west, from Baalgad in the valley of Lebanon even unto the mount Halak, that goeth up to Seir; which Joshua gave unto the tribes of Israel for a possession according to their divisions; 8 In the mountains, and in the valleys, and in the plains, and in the springs, and in the wilderness, and in the south country; the Hittites, the Amorites, and the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites: 9 The king of Jericho, one; the king of Ai, which is beside Bethel, one; 10 The king of Jerusalem, one; the king of Hebron, one; 11 The king of Jarmuth, one; the king of Lachish, one; 12 The king of Eglon, one; the king of Gezer, one; 13 The king of Debir, one; the king of Geder, one; 14 The king of Hormah, one; the king of Arad, one; 15 The king of Libnah, one; the king of Adullam, one; 16 The king of Makkedah, one; the king of Bethel, one; 17 The king of Tappuah, one; the king of Hepher, one; 18 The king of Aphek, one; the king of Lasharon, one; 19 The king of Madon, one; the king of Hazor, one; 20 The king of Shimronmeron, one; the king of Achshaph, one; 21 The king of Taanach, one; the king of Megiddo, one; 22 The king of Kedesh, one; the king of Jokneam of Carmel, one; 23 The king of Dor in the coast of Dor, one; the king of the nations of Gilgal, one; 24 The king of Tirzah, one: all the kings thirty and one.

    19 Joshua 47: And the coast of the children of Dan went out too little for them: therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem, and took it, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and possessed it, and dwelt therein, and called Leshem, Dan, after the name of Dan their father.

    1 Chronicles 4:39-43: 39 And they went to the entrance of Gedor, even unto the east side of the valley, to seek pasture for their flocks. 40 And they found fat pasture and good, and the land was wide, and quiet, and peaceable; for they of Ham had dwelt there of old. 41 And these written by name came in the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, and smote their tents, and the habitations that were found there, and destroyed them utterly unto this day, and dwelt in their rooms: because there was pasture there for their flocks. 42 And some of them, even of the sons of Simeon, five hundred men, went to mount Seir, having for their captains Pelatiah, and Neariah, and Rephaiah, and Uzziel, the sons of Ishi. 43 And they smote the rest of the Amalekites that were escaped, and dwelt there unto this day.

    1 Samuel 15:5-8: 5 And Saul came to a city of Amalek, and laid wait in the valley. … 7 And Saul smote the Amalekites from Havilah until thou comest to Shur, that is over against Egypt. 8 And he took Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, and utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword.

    Numbers 21:2-3: 2 And Israel vowed a vow unto the Lord, and said, If thou wilt indeed deliver this people into my hand, then I will utterly destroy their cities. 3 And the Lord hearkened to the voice of Israel, and delivered up the Canaanites; and they utterly destroyed them and their cities: and he called the name of the place Hormah.

    Numbers 21:32-35: 32 And Moses sent to spy out Jaazer, and they took the villages thereof, and drove out the Amorites that were there. 33 And they turned and went up by the way of Bashan: and og the king of bashan went out against them, he, and all his people, to the battle at edrei. 34 And the Lord said unto Moses, Fear him not: for I have delivered him into thy hand, and all his people, and his land; and thou shalt do to him as thou didst unto Sihon king of the Amorites, which dwelt at Heshbon. 35 So they smote him, and his sons, and all his people, until there was none left him alive: and they possessed his land.

  47. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Just a couple miles east of my home is a huge settlement of chabad haredi Jews who know and believe in the Talmud.

    They have a completely separate community of thousands all studying Talmud. There are several big colonies of Chabad Haredim in LA city and the county

    I’ve spent my life around secular Jews. They might not know Talmud, but the jewish sense of superiority and endless grievance mongering and hatred of Christianity is blatant.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @jilles dykstra
  48. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @JamesinNewMexico

    If Iran welcomes “ real Jews” why did millions of them run to Europe and the United States starting when the Shah was overthrown?

    Now I suppose you’ll post one of those bible thumper Calvinist diatribes about the difference between Israelites and Jews based on some 2 thousand year old myth.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @CalDre
  49. Josecanuc says:

    “The Jewish law postulates that a dog is better than a goy.”

    If ‘science’ – the collection and analysis of ‘facts’ (‘certainties’) – was utilized by impartial scientists to ascertain if ‘dogs are better than a goy’ it would certainly be forced to say that yes indeed dogs are better than the vast majority of ‘goy’ or dirty, cattle.
    But the main problem with this Jewish law is that any honest Jew would have to admit that the Jews are just like everybody else – only more so.”

    And if the same objective science was utilized to determine if Jews are justified in referring to non Jews as ‘goy ‘or dirty cattle – after collecting and appraising all facts any independent scientist would be forced to concluded that the Jews are justified (presently) calling only – just the entire Christian West and all of its ‘international allies’ or ‘the international community’ – dirty cattle inasmuch as the proof is in the pudding or rather in objective uncorrupted reality.

    “None of this is reasonable, but reason is a sentiment that’s very unevenly distributed in the world,”
    Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the EU’s executive body.

  50. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Gordo

    There never was free speech either de jure or de facto in Britain.

    It’s worse now than it was in the 19th and early 20 th century but there were times when the regulation of speech was far more restrictive and harshly punished than it is now.

  51. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Curle

    3 thousand years of mixing, I’m sure most European Jews have a bit of non Jewish DNA and most non Jewish Europeans have a bit of Jewish DNA.

    And who’s to know if that Jewish DNA is from real Jews or those remote Jewish ancestors who crossed the Mediterranean into Europe 15,000 years ago?

    The visceral hatred of Spain in England after Catherine of Aragon’s divorce could be explained by a migration of Spanish Jews to England who had been expelled by Isabella mainly for selling Christian European slaves across the Mediterranean to Muslims.

    The Armada was designed to force England to control the English pirates who preyed in Spanish shipping.

    That’s how my English relatives made their money. They were Cornish/Devon pirates who made their fortune pirating Spanish and a century later Dutch treasure ships coming home from the colonies

    Whatever it was a long long time ago.

    • Replies: @Anon
  52. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    I don’t disbelieve you. But I hope you have some relaxed pleasant Jewish friends even amongst those who perhaps encourage their kids to spend a year in Israel. Apart from the mad Haredi can you distinguish the attitudes of the Jews you know by origins e.g. post WW2 orthodox Eastern Europe, upper middle class long ex-Europe etc.?

    • Replies: @Anon
  53. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @JamesinNewMexico

    You haven’t left kindergarten yet or you would know that to be Deep State you have to be in government…. Rewrite your rubbish after doing your homework.

    • Replies: @Wally
  54. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    I never heard of the presumably (post?) 1492 expulsions of that class of Jews by Isabella. Can you elaborate and say when and what it had to do with England?

    • Replies: @Curle
    , @Curle
    , @Curle
    , @Anon
  55. Iris says:
    @renfro

    Hi Renfro;

    I think Ron T describes the Jewish community in Britain.
    It is hard to explain why, but although Zionism is extremely powerful and covertly completely controls the British Establishment, it cannot express its arrogance and supremacist racism openly, as it does in other countries such as the US or France.

    Because the British, as a people, are genuinely tolerant and respectful towards cultural, religious and ethnic differences, Jewish people are rarely abused.
    As a consequence, Zionists are forced to behave the same way to protect their image: they have less excuses to abuse and stigmatise other communities.

    This why the Zionists’ pet ISIS terrorists, murdering children in false flag terror attacks on British soil, come in handy.

    • Replies: @Wally
  56. Iris says:
    @Poupon Marx

    Margaret Thatcher destroyed the working class by drowning it into debt and making it a
    slave to the financial industry..

    See on the trend below what happened to the working class in 1982
    ( “Figure 2: Private debt and credit in the UK since 1880″)

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/neweconomics/the-ten-graphs-which-show-how-britain-became-a-wholly-owned-subsiduary-of-the-city-of-london-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/

  57. Iris says:
    @ohmy

    And undoubtedly the greatest French author of all the 20th century.

    You have much taste :-) :-)

  58. Wally says:
    @Iris

    “As a consequence, Zionists are forced to behave the same way to protect their image: they have less excuses to abuse and stigmatise other communities. ”

    So is that why singer / songwriters like Alison Chabloz get arrested for writing & singing comedic songs criticizing Jews & their fake ‘holocaust’?

    Is that why there are numerous charges of the ‘antisemitism’ against various public figures when Jews don’t like their views?

    http://www.codoh.com

  59. Wally says:
    @Anon

    “If Iran welcomes “ real Jews” why did millions of them run to Europe and the United States starting when the Shah was overthrown? ”

    That’s an easy one.

    To grab their blood money and run, that’s why

    The Shah and his Jews did not , do not have a very good reputation anywhere.

  60. Wally says:
    @Anon

    Wrong.

    Being “in the government” and being in the media rather amount to the same thing.

  61. Curle says:
    @Anon

    Not post 1492. He was responding to me and I referenced the Tudors allegedly allowing in Sephardim. And that these folks may have assisted England in her exercises against Spain. Tudor era starts 1485.

  62. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    I don’t really inquire. I just listen

  63. Curle says:
    @Anon

    Further, Spanish Jews who escaped to the New World were mostly safe as cryptos until 1590. And there are alleged to have been considerable cryptos among the Huguenots.

  64. Curle says:
    @Anon

    “Moreover, according to depositions taken before the Inquisition at Lisbon and at Madrid in 1588 – the year of the Spanish Armada, Nuñez was not acting alone but in concert with several crypto-Jews. Based in London, where they publicly attended Lutheran churches, listened to sermons and took communion, this group was connected by marriage alliances, secretly observed Jewish rites and had ties with a clandestine synagogue in Antwerp. Among them was Benjamin George (Gonsalvo or Dunstan Añes), a freeman of the Grocers’ Company, spice trader, financial agent of the Portuguese pretender Don Antonio and father-in-law of Dr Rodrigo Lopez.[101] An importer of aniseed and sumac, Lopez was appointed Queen Elizabeth’s chief physician about 1586. Within a year he seems to have been bribed and turned into a Spanish agent. Following Walsingham’s death in 1590 Lopez became embroiled in a power struggle between rival intelligence agencies headed by Lord Burghley – which utilized a number of crypto-Jewish merchants – and the Earl of Essex. At Essex’s instigation Lopez was arrested in January 1594 and examined about his part in an alleged plot to poison Elizabeth. A signed confession was extracted under torture and a guilty verdict obtained on the opening day of his trial. Then along with two supposed Portuguese accomplices Lopez – portrayed as ‘worse than Judas himself’ – was executed.[102]”

    http://www.fupress.net/index.php/cromohs/article/view/13673/12738

    • Replies: @Anon
  65. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Isabella expelled the Jews for among other things, slave trading of White European Christian slaves to Muslim Turks and Arabs. Good for her.

    Curle mentioned the theory that many Spanish Jews came to England in Tudor times after expulsion from Spain. First I’ve ever heard of that theory.

    But it’s pretty well documented that England went on a big hate fest against Spain starting in the 1530s. England got very very rich during the time of ER1 pirating the Spanish treasure ships coming home.

    Hawkins Drake Raleigh Gilbert and the rest were all Devon and Cornwall men perfectly placed in southern England to go out and raid the Spanish ships. Piracy, smuggling and killing survivors of shipwrecks for salvage were major industries in Devon & Cornwall for centuries.

    Only reason Drake sailed around the world to the Pacific was to rob the Spanish treasure ships traveling from Macao to Manila to the west coast of Panama

    Spain traded with China and Japan via the Portuguese ports of Nagasaki and Macao and looted the new world.

    English French Turk Algerian and Dutch pirates looted the Spanish ships on their way home.

    It’s my opinion that a lot of the English hate and suspicion of Spain was just to justify the piracy. Very similiar to the hatred whipped up in America against countries like Afghanistan Syria Iraq Libya

    So, the English whipped up hatred of Spain to justify the piracy. Jews have never forgotten Isabella and Spain for expelling them for illegal slave trading.

    Maybe if there were a substantial number of Spanish Jews in England the Jewish hatred and English hatred of Spain came together.

    Most of the Jewish histories say nothing about a big exodus of Spanish Jews to England

    I doubt Curle’s idea about Spanish Jews in England during Tudor times. There were always stories about Jews in the entourage of the Spanish Ambassadors to England

    It was a long time ago.

    Jews hate all the goyim nations. The two nations most hated by Jews are Spain and Poland

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @DFH
  66. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @renfro

    First off, Cromwell wasn’t a WASP by todays definitions.

    Eh? He was: Wealthy, Anglo-Saxon (or at least English), and Protestant. What more do you want?

  67. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Curle

    Fact check. There were no Lutheran churches in England until cerca 1680-90s and certainly not in the time of ER1.

    So Lopez and other secret Jews could not have publicly attended a Lutheran church.

    Lopez was a recent Portuguese immigrant to England

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  68. j says: • Website
    @Just_Sayin'

    Ethiopian Jews (the Falasha) are converted Christians, and they fought 400 years to maintain their religion. They have not a drop of the original Judean and Samaritan blood, yet they are Jews and accepted a Jews. How could they be rejected after suffering so much for Judaism?

    If the Sepharadim are Arab converts, and Ashkenazim are Turks, then the Nazi race science is wrong and Hitler made a big mistake. What do you have against Turks? Who do you consider “real” Jews? Palestinian Muslims? They will cut your neck if you suggest such a thing.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  69. @escobar

    I think I covered it in the Cabbala of Power, or, if you want it short and concise, in the Pardes https://www.amazon.com/Pardes-Israel-Shamir/dp/1419606018 or even shorter here http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Medina.htm

  70. @j

    The Hitler Germany laws defining jews had nothing to do with race, the definition of who was a jew depended on the religion of parents and grandparents, and of course, one’s own religion.
    So there were full jews to an eight jew.
    There was a small problem with this definition, if a ‘real’ German had converted to judaism, this did happen through weddings mainly, how to prevent that this ‘real’ German was classified as a jew ?
    Do not remember how this was solved.

  71. @Anon

    You underestimate how in the good old days religion mainly defined one’s identity.
    Henry VIII was fed up with the pope turning around his decisions, so he made himself head of a seperate religion in Britain.
    And of course, he liked to have the very rich monasteries.
    Yet, in fact religion meant very little.
    Little Holland could just exist by playing out the catholic king Philip II in Spain, deeply religious, and the king of France, Britain and the Ottoman empire, against each other.
    The Ottoman rulers were as religious as Saddam was.
    In the 19th century nation states emerged.
    It is interesting to read the book quoted below written by a deeply religious French historian about the clash of religions.
    The clash peters out let us say from 1900 on, Muslims fought against Muslims, Muslims fought with christians, in WWII, Arabs against the Ottomans.
    Iran and Iraq were at war.
    Herbert H. Rowen, ‘John de Witt, Statesman of the “True Freedom”‘, Cambridge 1986
    Jean-Paul Roux, ‘Un choc des religions, La longue guerre de l’Islam et la chrétienté 622 – 2007′, Paris 2007
    Of course, Roux sees present western colonialism and imperialism again as a clash of religions.

  72. @Anon

    As, I suspect, christianity was invented to undermine judaism, their ideas have some ground.
    Just in the 19th century jews got equal rights.
    They, again in my opinion, did not use these equal rights wisely, so antisemitism began
    Ismar Schorsch, ‘Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870 – 1914′, New York 1972

  73. utu says:
    @escobar

    where no Cossacks or Nazis prevented them from”making it”

    Because Cossacks were never a cause of anything. They were the excuse.

  74. @Realist

    The Lord Justice in question is a Sikh and more than likely a Khalistani to boot and they are just as crazy if not more than the Jews and Muslims for they are so proud of their Levant derived monotheism. Hindus maybe all things but they aren’t batshit crazy to bugger the Limey!

    • Replies: @Realist
  75. Hessler says:
    @Anon

    You might wanna infer again on who’s comment is based on documented facts and who’s is pure hateful, lying rant.

    The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back:
    “I’ve been found out”.

  76. @Seamus Padraig

    Freddie Mercury should have been fed to the birds!

    • Replies: @j
  77. Momus says:
    @ohmy

    Who exactly other than benthic Wally is making a serious claim to those 6/5 million numbers? It might have been the case 30 or 40 or 50 years ago, but not now. Researchers, historians demographers have revised the figures in line with research.

    The evil intent of the Nazis to exterminate European Jewry remains and is being reinforced by modern forensic investigation techniques as well as continuing trials of Nazis and prosecutions of lying deniers.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wally
  78. Realist says:
    @Dagon Shield

    Metaphorically speaking.

    • Replies: @Dagon Shield
  79. Ivan says:
    @CalDre

    The so-called light of the world type of Jews, who have fooled many so-called Christians can wear the the ‘Bolshevist’ tag, in the same manner as they have forced the Nazi tag on the Germans. There are killers and there are killers, but the extreme brutality of the Bolshevists towards all manifestations of Christianity points to a racial origin, in this case of the Jews , in the horrors that the old Russia endured. The native Russians retained a superstitious awe of the Romanovs. It took the riff-raff Jews from the sewers of NY to kill them off.

  80. Wally says:
    @Momus

    said:
    “but not now. Researchers, historians demographers have revised the figures in line with research”
    LOL And what “research” is that, Momus? Why do you hide this alleged “research”? Because it’s BS, simple as that.
    Talk about liars not keeping their lies straight, This is a long list of ever changing lies of Auschwitz:
    How many deaths at Auschwitz?

    https://codoh.com/library/document/1424/?lang=en

    [MORE]

    - 9,000,000 persons according to the documentary film Nuit et Brouillard (Night and Fog, 1955), whose historical advisers were the historians Henri Michel and Olga Wormser-Migot.
    - 8,000,000 persons according to the French War Crime Research Office and the French War Crime Information Service (1945).
    - 7,000,000 persons according to Raphaël Feigelson (1945).
    - 6,000,000 Jews according to Tibère Kremer, writer of a foreword for Miklos Nyiszli (1951).
    - 5,000,000 to 5,500,000 persons according to Bernard Czardybon (1945), according to confessions attributed to some SS members and according to the newspaper Le Monde (1978) that added: “of whom 90% Jews”.
    - 4,500,000 persons according to Henryk Mandelbaum (1945).
    - 4,000,000 persons according to a Soviet document of which the Nuremberg tribunal took “judicial notice“. This figure was inscribed nineteen times, with a commentary in as many different languages, on the Auschwitz-Birkenau monument. It was repeated by many different authors, including the Polish historian Franciszek Piper, ex-curator of the Auschwitz Museum.
    Then, it was declared false in 1990 and replaced on the monument, in 1995, by the figure of 1,500,000 with the concurrence of the same F. Piper for whom this figure is a maximum, while the minimum figure is 1,100,000.
    According to Miriam Novitch (1967), of the 4,000,000 dead, 2,700,000 were Jewish. According to Rabbi Moshe Weiss (1991), more than 4,000,000 persons died at Auchwitz, of whom 3,000,000 were Jews.

    - 3,500,000 persons according to the Dictionnaire de la langue française published by Hachette (1991). According to Claude Lanzmann (1980), there were 3,500,000 gassed of whom 95% of Jews as well as many other deaths.
    - 3,000,000 persons until December 1st, 1943, according to a confession extorted from Rudolf Höss, ex-Commander of Auschwitz.
    - 3,000,000 Jews gassed according to David Susskind (1986) and according to Heritage, the most important Californian Jewish weekly (1993).
    - 2,500,000 persons according to Rudolf Vrba for the Eichmann trial (1961).
    - 2,000,000 to 4,000,000 according to the historian Yehuda Bauer (1982).
    - 2,000,000 to 3,000,000 Jews killed as well as thousands of non-Jews
    according to a confession attributed to an SS named Pery Broad.
    - 2,000,000 to 2,500,000 persons killed according to a “confession” attributed to an SS physician, Dr. Friedrich Entress (1945).
    - 2,000,000 persons according to the historian Léon Poliakov (1951); according to the historian Georges Wellers (1973) and according to the woman historian Lucy Davidowicz (1975).
    - 1,600,000 persons according to the historian Yehuda Bauer (1989), of whom 1,352,980 Jews (the latter figure is from Georges Wellers, 1983).
    - 1,500,000 persons this figure, chosen by Lech Walesa, replaced, in 1995, on the Birkenau monument, the previous one of 4,000,000, withdrawn in 1990.
    1,471,595 persons of whom 1,352,980 Jews, according to the historian Georges Wellers (1983).
    - 1,250,000 persons or so of whom 1,000,000 Jews killed and more than 250,000 non-Jews dead, according to the historian Raul Hilberg.
    - 1,100,000 to 1,500,000 persons according to the historians Yisrael Gutman, Michael Berenbaum and Franciszek Piper (1994).
    - 1,000,000 persons according to Jean-Claude Pressac (1989) and the Dictionnaire des noms propres published by Hachette (1992).
    - 800,000 to 900,000 persons according to the historian Gerald Reitlinger (1953).
    - 775,000 to 800,000 persons according to Jean-Claude Pressac (1993), of whom 630,000 were gassed Jews.
    - 630,000 to 710,000 persons according to Jean-Claude Pressac (1994), of whom from 470,000 to 550,000 were gassed Jews.
    - 510.000 persons according to Fritjof Meyer (2002), of whom 356.000 were gassed Jews.[35]
    - 300,000 Welt im Film (British newsreel, nbr. 137)
    66.206 International Red Cross at Arolsen, c.
    Dept. of Holocaust investigations (Ref. nbr: 10824).

    more: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5631
    and: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9593
    and: https://www.historiography-project.com/misc/graf_jewishlosses.php
    and: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndstats.html
    http://www.codoh.com

  81. Wally says:
    @Momus

    said:
    “modern forensic investigation techniques as well as continuing trials of Nazis and prosecutions of lying deniers.”

    Don’t make me laugh. What “modern forensic investigation techniques”?
    The ones that absolutely do not / cannot show the immense remains that are claimed?
    More run & hide BS from Momos and those like him.

    ‘Only’ me?

    You wish, Zionist.

    [MORE]

    everyone see these:
    Holocaust Handbooks
    By Castle Hill Publishers

    https://codoh.com/library/series/1187/?lang=en

    and:
    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    Speaking of numbers, indeed, the ones that keep changing. LOL
    Aee the long list in my other recent post and:
    The Story Keeps Changing
    By Douglas Collins

    https://codoh.com/library/document/2463/?lang=en

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Momus
  82. Momus says:
    @Wally

    The ones that absolutely do not / cannot show the immense remains that are claimed?

    Who is making claims for ‘immense remains’ that are apparently unaccounted for, apart from you benthic Wally?

    No one else as far as I can see. It is just more lying from a denier with no evidence and without the fortitude to face that his case is spurious.

    By all accounts the remains of the huge numbers of Jews murdered by the Nazis in the Holocaust have been satisfactorily accounted for.

    • Replies: @CalDre
  83. Wally says:

    How predictable. Zionist child Momus doesn’t even know the impossible narrative he’s hopelessly trying to defend. LOL
    And do tell us Momus how the “remains of the huge numbers of Jews murdered by the Nazis in the Holocaust have been satisfactorily accounted for.”
    Please show them to us. We’re waiting. A good laugh is guaranteed.
    For starters:

    - Jew ‘historian’ Raul Hilberg wrote in his three-volume book entitled “The Destruction of the European Jews” that there were 700,000 – 900,000 bodies buried at Treblinka.

    [MORE]

    Alleged location of Treblinka remains, curiously blocked, hmm.:

    Here is a “chilling” photo from ‘Surviving Treblinka’, by Samuel Willenberg.

    It is captioned: “crane lifting corpses destined for cremation”
    Does anyone see any “corpses”? :lol:

    And if anyone claims that 34,000 Jews were not buried at Babi Yar, then why did Jews go looking for them, with zero results? LOL, see:
    !! Excavation Result: No Enormous Human Remains as Alleged at Babi Yar !! … of
    course

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11314

    Sobibor ‘monument’ supposedly over the remains of 250,000 Jew, actual remains of the alleged 250,ooo cannot be shown.

    found

    Alleged “ash pond” for 1,100,000 Jew remains at Auschwitz, no actual remains can be shown.

    Per their alleged ‘holocaust by bullets’ the ‘holocau$t’ Industry now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.
    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?

    Poor Momus, his cognitive dissonance is overwhelming him.
    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Momus
  84. j says: • Website
    @Dagon Shield

    Poor fagot died of HIV. I do not wish that death on innocent vultures.

  85. j2 says:
    @ohmy

    I did some calculations on the number of Jews killed. Scroll the following link to Holocaust controversy. All my calculations use the American Jewish Yearbooks corrected by what are known errors there (like the difference between 1938 and 1948 you mention)

    http://www.pienisalaliittotutkimus.com/categories-kategoriat/

    The last post is a simple summary of what I get as figures.

  86. Momus says:
    @Wally

    Nobody that matters cares about your postulates benthic Wally. You are growling at the moon.

    The Nazis were an efficient organisation and the SS killers went to extraordinary lengths to dispose of and conceal the huge numbers of people they murdered.

    That has been known and documented thousands of times. Bodies were incinerated, the ash and bones pulverised and spread across the country side to become the soil or thrown into rivers and washed to the sea.

    Shot victims were buried and disinterred and burnt and scattered.

    Mass gravesites abound, many are unmarked and many that are known are left as the are out of basic decency for the victims and of course religious conviction.

    Jews have no need to brag about their lament: the facts are understood and the evidence for an attempted genocide is an avalanche.

    That is all that matters to the vast majority of the worlds population.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wally
    , @anarchyst
    , @Da Wei
  87. Wally says:
    @Momus

    Once again you do not even know the tall tales you are trying to defend. LOL
    And you simply ignored the damning information that I posted.

    You are now calling ‘holocaust historian Raul Hilberg a liar. LOL
    You are now saying that the fake displays at numerous “extermination sites”, which I posted, are lies. LOL
    You are now saying that Jews who actually went looking for the alleged mass graves, with no results, are actually lying about their efforts. LOL

    In the book ‘Holocaust By Bullets‘ it is claimed that the sites are precisely known, though they don’t dare get a couple of guys with shovels to proof that massive numbers of Jews are buried in these claimed locations. We know why.
    see:
    ‘Holocaust by Bullets: Uncovering the Reality of alleged Genocide’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7362

    and:
    Mattogno demolishes ‘Holocaust by Bullets’ ‘mass graves’ fraud

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9768

    and:
    “Holocaust by Bullets” debunked

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5410

    And there is your absurdly alleged grinding of Jew bones.But even that absurdity would still leave massive remains which would need to buried. Oops.
    Here is the allged ‘bone grinding machine:Which is really a small cement mixer. LOL
    see:
    The Bone Mill of Lemberg

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3220/?lang=en

    Human remains of an alleged 11,000,000 just don’t disappear.

    • Replies: @Momus
  88. Wally says:
    @Momus

    also said:
    “Mass gravesites abound, many are unmarked and many that are known are left as the are out of basic decency for the victims and of course religious conviction.”

    Nonsense. We’re talking about an alleged enormous crime and the fact that the alleged sites are not in Jew countries, nor do even Jews stop exhumations of Jews. Oops

    See Momus’s dumb & desperate excuse debunked here:

    The Big Excuse: ‘excavation & exhumation of Jews forbidden’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6817

    and:
    “The mass graves were opened and the corpses were taken out, to be consumed by the flames of huge pyres (the ‘roasts’). The bones were crushed and, together with the ashes, WERE REBURIED IN THE SAME GRAVES.”
    - Israel Gutman (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, 4 vols., Macmillan, New York 1990, vol. 4, p. 1481-87
    TREBLINKA: EXTERMINATION CAMP OR TRANSIT CAMP? Mattogno/Graf, 2004, 2005, 2011, p.15.

    http://vho.org/GB/Books/t/1.html#ftnref19

  89. CalDre says:
    @Anon

    Maybe because they lost their privileged position and they took their ill-gotten gains and rain? And in other cases, because they preferred not to live among a more theological society? Maybe they never really considered themselves Persians, but firstly and perhaps only Jews, so leaving Iran was no big deal for them?

    It’s amazing how you Jew supremacists always want to blame others when Jews move. Jews have been moving for millenia. I move often too, and it’s not because someone is driving me out with racism. So do countless billions of people. And movement is even more common when there are stark social changes and some people don’t have any real connection to the country, like Jews who consider themselves Jews and not Persians, Iraqis or Syrians.

  90. CalDre says:
    @Momus

    the remains of the huge numbers of Jews murdered by the Nazis in the Holocaust have been satisfactorily accounted for

    Oh, please, do account for them, you hoaxer you.

    Show us the pictures from Allied fly-overs of the camps of the cremation ovens “spewing black smoke 24 hours a day”, as the small handful of lying “witnesses” to the Holohoax proclaim. I’ve seen lots of aerial photos, even ones taken during the period of the alleged most numerous “gassings”, and not a single one shows any of this smoke.

    And what about the Red Cross, which had access to every single camp throughout the entire war? Yes, you Holohoaxers like to ignore that one. But they have no evidence of gassings, or remains.

    Maybe you like that Jew witness to the Holohoax that also claimed she swallowed and re-swallowed pooped-out diamonds for 3 years? I guess she had time to dig through her poop every day to find that precious diamond and swallow it again. That is the credibility of these “witnesses” to the Holohoax. If you look at their stories, they are all swallowing crap (no pun intended!).

    It is not up to anyone to prove the Nazis’ “innocence” of this fantastic crime the Jews invented to blame on Germans. It is up to the liars to prove their lies. Something they are utterly unable to do, save for a few of these poop – excuse me, diamond – swallowing lunatics Spielberg interviews in his Shoah “Show Me Da Money” idiot flick.

    • Replies: @Momus
  91. anarchyst says:
    @Momus

    IF the “truth” is what you say, why is any deviation from “official holocaust ™ orthodoxy” punishable by prosecution and imprisonment? Why are Ursula Haverbeck, Monika Schaefer (both 80+ year-old grandmothers) and others incarcerated in German maximum-security prisons?
    What are you and your ilk afraid of? The TRUTH?
    The jewish holocaust™ is the biggest hoax and money grab in modern history.
    The latest jewish “holocaust ™” swindle is that of the “holocaust ™ transference syndrome” where (only) jewish “holocaust™ memories are transferred to their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and even to unrelated persons. This claim by two jewish psychiatrists is gaining traction among jewish “holocaust ™” promoters in order to “keep the dream alive” and to “keep the reparations and shekels flowing”. You see, these children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and other unrelated individuals are also seen as jewish “holocaust ™” survivors, worthy of reparations and special treatment.
    When will it end?

    • Replies: @Momus
  92. Momus says:
    @Wally

    Great photo of an old ball mill.

    I recommissioned and modified a larger one similar to that for a guy who was extracting the residual gold from circa 1870′s mullock heaps. Certainly wouldn’t be much use for the crushing of lots of human bones.

    The Nazis used camp inmates as slave laborers to pulverise bones with hammers and mallets after cremation or incineration. This is well documented and of course meant that the evidence could be effectively concealed by periodically executing the unfortunate workers.

    • Replies: @Wally
  93. DFH says:
    @Anon

    But it’s pretty well documented that England went on a big hate fest against Spain starting in the 1530s.

    It started after Mary, probably because she burned people and her husband subsequently tried to invade England.
    Or it could be a hidden Jewish conspiracy, your choice

  94. Momus says:
    @anarchyst

    IF the “truth” is what you say, why is any deviation from “official holocaust ™ orthodoxy” punishable by prosecution and imprisonment? Why are Ursula Haverbeck, Monika Schaefer (both 80+ year-old grandmothers) and others incarcerated in German maximum-security prisons?

    Those two old denier molls have the social equivalent of syphilis and Ebola according to the German state?

    Advanced countries interested in a harmonious society all have race hate incitement laws to prevent bogus freedom of speech rights to be used as stalking horses.

    How hard is that to understand? It is not all about your POV.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @anarchyst
  95. Momus says:
    @CalDre

    It is not up to anyone to prove the Nazis’ “innocence” of this fantastic crime the Jews invented to blame on Germans. It is up to the liars to prove their lies. Something they are utterly unable to do, save for a few of these poop – excuse me, diamond – swallowing lunatics Spielberg interviews in his Shoah “Show Me Da Money” idiot flick.

    The holocaust is an accepted historical fact.

    Next you sad old NS loving jew haters will be trying to tell me that the concentration camps were actually prototype kibbutz. What a laugh.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @CalDre
    , @Anon
  96. Wally says:
    @Momus

    laughably said, while he dodges my previous info:

    “The Nazis used camp inmates as slave laborers to pulverise bones with hammers and mallets after cremation or incineration. This is well documented and of course meant that the evidence could be effectively concealed by periodically executing the unfortunate workers.”

    Seriously? Then where did the remains go? To the air? LOL
    How can there be “documents” if the hillarious bone grinders were killed? LOL

    also said:
    “I recommissioned and modified a larger one similar to that for a guy who was extracting the residual gold from circa 1870′s mullock heaps. Certainly wouldn’t be much use for the crushing of lots of human bones.”

    But that IS the alleged bone grinder supposedly used to grind up Jews. LOL
    The link that you dodged that contains that photo and more:
    Holocaust Bone Grinding

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3220/?lang=en

    Again, you don’t even know the the ridiculous story that you’re try to defend.

    You’re making a fool of yourself. LOL

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Momus
  97. Wally says:
    @Momus

    ignorantly said:
    “The holocaust is an accepted historical fact. ”

    - Witchcraft was also an accepted historical fact.
    - So was the flat earth.
    - So was the earth centered solar system.

    It’s a long list

    http://www.codoh.com

  98. Wally says:
    @Momus

    Indeed, Momus thinks freedom of speech is “bogus” and must be made illegal like it is in ‘Israel’ and most of faltering Europe.

    Here’s why:

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Only liars demand censorship.

    Only liars demand censorship.

    Momus also supports strict Israeli immigration laws which mandate JEWS ONLY, while demanding massive low IQ, 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe.

    http://www.codoh.com

  99. CalDre says:
    @Momus

    I don’t love NS and I don’t hate Jews. 0 for 3.

    Of course I do hate Jew supremacists, if only for the hate they feel for me and their desire for me to serve their evil, ignoble ends (b/c in my book, the Beast Yahweh is Satan and unfortunately Jews worship that Beast, and Jew supremacists, of which there are many as their Satanic Books the Talmud and Torah preach it, want to rule over the entire planet and impose their evil, totalitarian, tyrannical ideology on everyone).

    The holocaust is an accepted historical fact.

    It is true many are brainwashed to believe it. That does not make it fact, any more than the belief that the world was flat a few generations ago made that a fact. Facts aren’t decided by who controls the media and can indoctrinate the most people. Any ape knows that.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Momus
  100. anarchyst says:
    @Momus

    I generally do not personally criticize my fellow commenters, but Momus, you are one sick puppy…

  101. Momus says:
    @Wally

    Seriously? Then where did the remains go? To the air? LOL
    How can there be “documents” if the hillarious bone grinders were killed? LOL

    Some of the remains quite literally did go to the air- of course most of a cadaver’s mass is water and a lot of the ash would also be blown away after it had been spread and or mixed into sand and soil.

    It may not have occurred to you benthic Wally but the soil you stand on, that grows the food you eat, is partly composed of the remains of organisms, including people:

    “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.”.

    That is why the Nazis burnt so many corpses and had their slaves manually pulverise the big bone fragments; they revert to earth ;-)

    I am not sure why you are linking me to the small ball mill in the photo. You are making the claims about it, not me. I said in my experience that human bones would be no grist for it so we are in furious agreement.

    • Replies: @Wally
  102. Momus says:
    @CalDre

    It is true many are brainwashed to believe it. That does not make it fact, any more than the belief that the world was flat a few generations ago made that a fact.

    Window licker grade comment.

    There is incontrovertible, scientific evidence for a spherical earth on an orbit around the sun and just as convincing proof for the Holocaust.

    What do you suggest were the various purposes of the massive concentration camp infrastructure built by Nazis during WW2?

  103. Hibernian says:
    @Anon

    Lutheran influence on the schismatic Church of England began early; it was a schismatic Catholic church for about six years.

    • Replies: @Anon
  104. CalDre says:
    @Momus

    There is incontrovertible, scientific evidence for a spherical earth on an orbit around the sun and just as convincing proof for the Holocaust.

    And there is just as much incontrovertible, scientific evidence for the Holohoax being a fraud. Except anyone trying to conduct scientific tests, open to peer review, and discuss the results, is sent into prison for 10 years or longer. Like Galileo. Imagine, if the Catholic Church, like the Jew supremacist rabbis, had imprisoned everyone who dared question that the Earth is Flat. Idiots like you would still be believing it.

    Any “fact” that relies on the severe oppression of all scientific research to support it, is not a fact at all – it is a lie, a fiction, a fraud, a Holo-hoax.

    What do you suggest were the various purposes of the massive concentration camp infrastructure built by Nazis during WW2?

    They were work camps. That’s why they were all surrounded by … factories. They produced most of the ammunition used against the Red Army – ironic, isn’t it?

    As I noted, the Red Cross had access to every single camp, during every single day of their existence. Unfettered, full access. It says so in their own monumental reports – published YEARS after the end of WW II (so no argument they were “lying” to protect access to the camps). There is nothing in there about gassings or even mass killings in those massive tombs. The Jew supremacist response, as they are programmed to do, is to claim the IRGC is anti-Semitic. But to their credit, to this day, the IRGC has NOT renounced their report and stands by it. Remember, these are people who had unfettered access to the camps every single day, with no motive to lie (after all, they were there to help and monitor the prisoners).

    There simply is no evidence of your Holohoax, whether demographic studies (the world Jewish population barely dropped during the war, though the German and Russian populations dropped quite dramatically), scientific studies (to the extent allowed, which they aren’t), the amazingly massive number of survivors if they were death camps (reparation claims – MILLIONS of survivors – stupid Germans, couldn’t kill the Jews they already had in the camps, lol), lack of any forensic evidence to prove it (and strict penalties against anyone seeking scientific evidence), utter suppression of free speech (although denying the Holohoax is not even remotely hate speech, that’s how it’s painted, in the desperate endeavor to prevent the topic receiving much needed sunlight), lack of any German orders to conduct mass killings (despite the Allies obtaining huge troves of documents not only from Berlin but from the camps themselves), etc.

    What evidence is there for it? Some testimony. That’s it. And the vast majority of those testifying claims they were forced into labor at the camps – hence the big sign over the Auschwitz entrance, “Arbiet Macht Free” (Work Liberates). Only a small handful, who to the man have utterly fantastic tales that no sane person would believe, claim they saw gassings.

    Did you know about the Auschwitz soccer pitch? 100 yards from the alleged “gas chambers”. So all the football players could see people walk into the chambers and be killed and tell the camp about it. Because, you know, the stupid Germans weren’t worried that 100,000 prisoners might overpower a few hundred guards if they actually believed they were going to be killed.

    The Holohoax story, in one word: preposterous.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  105. Wally says:
    @Momus

    “What do you suggest were the various purposes of the massive concentration camp infrastructure built by Nazis during WW2?”

    First, try ‘labor camps’. For making materials for the war effort.
    To begin with I suggest you read up on synthetic fuel & Auschwitz.

    And, just like the US concentration camps for Japanese Americans who were thought to be threat to the US war effort just because they were Japanese, some, not all, Jews were held for security purposes with the intention of relocating them away from Germany and most of Europe.

    “There is incontrovertible, scientific evidence for a spherical earth on an orbit around the sun.
    Yes, IS.
    Previously such evidence was vigorously denounced.

    http://www.codoh.com

  106. Wally says:
    @Momus

    Because he doesn’t even know the official tall tales he’s attempting prop up, Momus ignores the point that the bone grinder in the photo promoted the ‘holocaust Industry’ is said to be the machine that ground up bones of millions of Jews. They say so, not me. LOL

    [MORE]


    again see:
    Claimed Holocaust Bone Grinding Machine / laughable Bone Mill of Lemberg

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3220/?lang=en

    To no surprise he continues to ignore science concerning the large amount of remains per corpse after cremation, which means countless tons when we multiply that by an alleged 11,000,000.
    Those do not, cannot be made too disappear.
    see:
    The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz
    A Technical and Historical Study

    https://codoh.com/library/document/4146/?lang=en

    and:
    The Crematoria Ovens of Auschwitz and Birkenau

    https://codoh.com/library/document/921/?lang=en

    and:
    Dissecting the Holocaust. Imprint
    By Germar Rudolf

    https://codoh.com/library/document/990/?lang=en

    http://www.codoh.com

  107. Momus says:

    Benthic Wally, I told you the machine is a small ball mill and highly unlikely to be useful for any more than test grinding. Still would have been interesting to examine.

    No, the bulk of the incinerated corpse large bones were pulverised with mallets, and returned to the soil. A corpse reduced to ashes weighs less than 3kg and has a volume that allows 600 people per cubic metre. Accepting that, you do the math, and a 22 metre or 72′ cube would be sufficient to contain the cremated remains of what you say is a claimed 6 million Jews. A 72′ cube might be the amount of earth removed for the parking basement of a small building. Not hard to dispose of that amount of ash over several years at several places is it?

    It could have been used to fertilize a Nazi SS 250 acre wheat field at one of the camps without being noticeable.

    So the idea that proof of the Holocaust relies on a massive gravesite is easily dealt with.

    • Replies: @Wally
  108. Wally says:

    Momus, you dodged where that picture is from, the US ‘Holocaust Museum’, LOL.

    Claimed Holocaust Bone Grinding Machine / laughable Bone Mill of Lemberg

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3220/?lang=en

    [MORE]

    Where we see it is claimed to be aJew bone grinding machine, here’s yet another laughable picture:

    “a bone crushing machine in the Janowska concentration camp (USHMM caption)
    LOL!!
    “The cremated remains of an adult male will usually weigh around six pounds while the remains of an adult female will be closer to four pounds. The height of the deceased rather than their weight has a strong correlation with the weight of the ashes produced through cremation.”

    https://www.cremationsolutions.com/information/scattering-ashes/all-about-cremation-ashes

    And then those remains still have to buried. And those sites are also claimed to be known. Oops.
    such as:
    “The mass graves were opened and the corpses were taken out, to be consumed by the flames of huge pyres (the ‘roasts’). The bones were crushed and, together with the ashes, WERE REBURIED IN THE SAME GRAVES.”
    - Israel Gutman (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, 4 vols., Macmillan, New York 1990, vol. 4, p. 1481-87
    And then, not all corpses, even under the impossible ‘holocaust’ tale, are said to have been cremated at all. Oops.

    Fertilized field? Show me the fields with their soil analyzed to show human remains. LOL

    http://www.codoh.com

  109. Wally says:
    @Momus

    absurdly said:
    “No, the bulk of the incinerated corpse large bones were pulverised with mallets, and returned to the soil. ”

    You still are in denial of the scam story you’re trying to defend. The Big Lie says that bone grinding machines were used, as I have posted repeatedly. LOL
    you also said:
    “So the idea that proof of the Holocaust relies on a massive gravesite is easily dealt with.”

    The Big Lies tries to rely on many things, your false strawman is noted. All equally impossible however. LOL
    But, the alleged mass graves in claimed known location is certainly primary. You wish that wasn’t the case but it is.
    Therefore:
    - You are now calling ‘holocaust historian Raul Hilberg a liar. Hilberg wrote in his three-volume book entitled “The Destruction of the European Jews” that there were 700,000 – 900,000 bodies buried at Treblinka. I agree.

    - You are now saying that the fake displays which label supposedly huge ‘mass graves’ at numerous “extermination sites”, which I posted, are lies. I agree.LOL
    - You are now saying that Jews who actually went looking for the alleged mass graves, with no results, are actually lying about their efforts.
    I guess they were really look for your laughable”mallets”. LOL

    Everyone see here for more on the failed searches for the allegedly know ‘immense holocaust remains’. Yet Momus says the attempted excavations weren’t really looking for Jew remains. LOL

    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=haimi+sobibor

    • Replies: @Them Guys
    , @Momus
  110. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hibernian

    The whole reformation was Luther influenced

    BUT

    There were no Lutheran churches in England until cerca 1680 90. So neithe Lopez not anyone else could have
    “ publicly attended” a Lutheran church in England during. The reign of ER1

    Why not ask Mr. google.

  111. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Momus

    The thing is Momus, the professional Jews who make a living representing the rest of the Jews have lied so much about almost everything in the last 120 years that no one believes anything the professional Jewish leadership claims.

    Look what the Jews said about the Ukrainian genocide, that it never happened, but it did. The Jews said senator McCarthy was wrong about communists in the US government
    The Verona filed prove he was absolutely right.

    It was Jews who fomented the Ferguson and Zimmerman persecutions.

    No one believes the professional Jews any more. The 108 year old collaboration of Jews and blacks didn’t work. Blacks don’t like Jews because are the rich privileged Whites Jews taught blacks to hate.

    Jews made a big attempt to collaborate with Hispanics but hispanicss totally rejected the Jewish attempts. Asians can take care of themselves and don’t need the Jewish hero to lead their fight against evil Whitey.

    Jews still have complete control of the courts and the politicians But most Americans regard Jews as an oppressive overclass, which the professional Jews are.

    Only Jews and blacks believed that officer Wilson and George Zimmerman did anything wrong by the self defense killing of useless black thugs trying to murder them.
    Every one else knew it was a Jewish and black rabble rouser Lynch mob.

    It’s more the 120 history of the professional Jews lieing about everything that causes skepticism about every official Jewish pronouncement, including what ever happened to Jews during WW2

    The latest horror by the government of Israel and the professional Jews is the attempted extortion of 300 billion USD from Poland because Germany invaded and occupied Poland during WW2.

    Jews rule America. But Americans especially immigrants resent it and just don’t believe what Jews claim.

    And you lost your black collaborators.

  112. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Momus

    Whatever the truth about the holocaust, Jews lie so much about everything no one believes Jewish propaganda about anything anymore.

  113. Them Guys says:
    @Wally

    Too Funny!! As I read yet another of massive hokum idiotic Talmudic like circle logic spin scam from momus. I had a vivid in full color vision in my mind of little jewish elves akin to santas elves hard at work, a pounding away furiously with their small sized wooden mallets. And working against the clock of time in order to keep up with their task at hand, which unlike real santas elves crews make toys for kiddies at xmass….These jewish elves must Hammer at them Bones day and nite 24/7 to keep ahead of the ever larger pile of six gazillions of dead bone piles!

    All the while those jewish elves with small wooden hammers, furiously pounding dead bones into dust, and needing to keep looking over their shoulders for that big Huge mean as sin evil Nazi SS man with strict orders from, Da Fhurerman hisself, to constantly Bull Whip them jewish elves so to keep them in line of course. While the jewish elves hammering out a tune of Dat feet bone is connected to da leg bone, and da leg bones connected to da thigh bone, heheheh….What the fuck is next from the likes of these tall tale tellers of fantasy and lies they themselves actually believe eh?

    There is simply No possible end of countless wild tales and jewish fables when the issue is jewrys greatest 20th century swindle scam of…HolyHoax. And when ever the issue is other than their hoax claims…Fear not for a dozen of jews await to Pounce and quickly Make every issue all about their scam hoax, and with many more new exciting fabled claims to bewilder and confuse the unsuspecting goyim.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  114. Momus says:
    @Wally

    You still are in denial of the scam story you’re trying to defend. The Big Lie says that bone grinding machines were used, as I have posted repeatedly.

    Benthic Wally, you are at it again.

    Where have I said I believe corpse grinding machines were used? Nowhere is the answer. My opinion is ball mills may have been tested as bone grinders, but more likely not and that any found were used for something else- probably an activity at the site prior to it becoming a concentration/slave/extermination camp for Jews.

    It is beyond any doubt that German Jews were persecuted prior to WW2 by Hitler’s Nazis and then and during that war the organised, systematic, industrial scale extermination of European Jewry and (((almost))) equal efforts to conceal it was planned and put into effect.

    This is the Holocaust as I understand it. Your mileage may vary. I’ve seen the mountains of evidence, the concentration camp gas chambers, corpse incinerators, slave laborers, piles of corpses and the photos of mass graves and exhumations.

    The Holocaust is real and undeniable.

    • Replies: @Wally
  115. j2 says:

    ” I’ve seen the mountains of evidence, the concentration camp gas chambers, corpse incinerators, slave laborers, piles of corpses and the photos of mass graves and exhumations.”

    I have seen all evidence you mention, but it is very weak for a genocide accusation. Piles of corpses of very thin people, who died of typhus when the camps collapsed at the end of the war. Gas chambers, but not the homocidal gas chambers that were supposedly used. Corpse incinerators, yes, I saw one the first time I was in Auschwitz (1989), they did not show it anymore in 2016. Slave laborers there were and not only Jewish. Photos I have seen. But I would like to see a mass grave opened and examined. There is no such thing like decency to the dead in a case of a mass murder. Open the graves and show how many bodies there are.

  116. Wally says:
    @Momus

    “Where have I said I believe corpse grinding machines were used?”

    The liars that you say you believe said it. As shown in may posts.

    Are YOU now saying they are liars? LOL

    Then he laughably repeats himself, again:
    “then and during that war the organised, systematic, industrial scale extermination of European Jewry and (((almost))) equal efforts to conceal it was planned and put into effect.

    This is the Holocaust as I understand it. Your mileage may vary. I’ve seen the mountains of evidence, the concentration camp gas chambers, corpse incinerators, slave laborers, piles of corpses and the photos of mass graves and exhumations.

    The Holocaust is real and undeniable.”

    Except, as I have shown repeatedly, you have no proof . You cannot show this “mountains of evidence”. LOL
    Everyone review this thread to see step by step examples of Momus lying, and contradicting himself, and the impossible tall tales he claims to support.

    http://www.codoh.com

  117. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @Momus

    The fate of his book in Israel was twisted. Shortly after finishing the manuscript of his book, he presented it to Yad Vashem for publication (1957), Yad Vashem, headed by …
    first agreed, but later declined. The reason was not the quality of the whole work – it was evaluated as the best comprehensive study to date – but Hilberg’s evaluation of Jewish behavior vis-a-vis the Nazis, especially the Judenrate (Jewish Councils), whom he saw as a cog in the destruction machine.

    He had written that “if we look at the whole Jewish reaction pattern, we notice that in its two salient features it is an attempt to avert action and, failing that, automatic compliance with orders. Why is this so? Why did the Jews act in this way? They hoped that somehow the German drive would spend itself.
    He also published Adam Czerniakow’s diary (together with Yad Vashem’s Joseph Kermisz), but remained extremely critical of the value of survivor testimonies until his death (see his Sources of Holocaust Research, 2001).

    https://www.haaretz.com/1.4966143

  118. @Them Guys

    Yup.

    “Dem Nazis; muh holycaust.”

    …and with many more new exciting fabled claims to bewilder and confuse the unsuspecting goyim.

    To bewilder, confuse and shakedown unsuspecting goyim gulls. It’s a veritable majik formula…

  119. @Momus

    What do you suggest were the various purposes of the massive concentration camp infrastructure built by Nazis during WW2?

    Hey, that’s easy!

    The inmates were kept in them for protection. Were any camps bombed while Jews were in them? Protective custody ya know.

  120. @CalDre

    …hence the big sign over the Auschwitz entrance, “Arbiet Macht Free” (Work Liberates)

    I find it ironic that work as a liberating force is a constant theme in the Zionist, Max Nordau’s, Conventional Lies of our Civilization(1883).

    https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Conventional_Lies_of_our_Civilization

    Just as Orwell pointed out, there is little difference in practice, between Communism and Capitalism, and there are obviously few practical differences between what the Nais were accused of doing and what the Israeli Zionists are doing today.

    A big difference is that the Nazis faced true existential threats whereas today’s Izzy Zionists are the main threats to to peaceful existence if not existence in general.

    I bet Nordau’s tossing in his grave over what the crazies in Israel have done to his ideas. He’d no doubt cringe over the vicious inanities of momus and kin.

  121. Greg.pl says:

    Dear Mr Shamir,
    להיות שיבח
    תודה רבה
    Greg.pl

  122. snag says:
    @Israel Shamir

    How convenient – How about the first 30 years in Soviet Union and another 15 after WWII in Soviet dominated countries?

  123. snag says:
    @Israel Shamir

    I beg your pardon, but the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Yuri Andropov’s mother Yevgenia Karlovna Fleckenstein was Jewish, that makes him a Jew.

  124. dogday says:

    Unbelievable! The Brits are going to sit back and allow Jews to dictate what “freedom” means? They must be crazy. “Offensive to the Jewish people” is in the nature of satire, comedy. light verse.

    Like Gilad Atzmon says, it is already too late for UK and the USA, both are now in the pocket of the Jewish power and this is what we are seeing, these are the source of the changes we are seeing.

    • Replies: @snag
  125. snag says:
    @dogday

    That’s what they said about Weimar Republic, it can change overnight like in 1933 ,…

  126. Da Wei says:
    @Momus

    Momus,

    Have you read Douglas Reed on this subject? The evidence he offers is overwhelming that the number of Jews who died in the labor camps was proportionate to those in the general population. It may have been even less, considering many Jews operated as “trustees” and helped run the place.

    Also, if what you say is so evident, why is it illegal to argue the point?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Israel Shamir Comments via RSS