The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIsrael Shamir Archive
Philip Giraldi’s Remedy for Wars
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
May 5, 2016: Ultra-Zionist Billionaire Megadonor Sheldon Adelson attends 4th annual champions of Jewish values international awards gala at Marriott Marquis Times Square
May 5, 2016: Ultra-Zionist Billionaire Megadonor Sheldon Adelson attends 4th annual champions of Jewish values international awards gala at Marriott Marquis Times Square

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Once in a while, an observer notices a concerted Jewish action, and reports on it pro bono publico. It could be that Jews support Third-world immigration, or Jews fight the memorials, or, in the recent case, Jews promote the war on Iran. The Jews respond with a huge vehement counterattack and make life very difficult for the outspoken observer. Afterwards, the subject recedes, as people get cold feet to proceed, or do not know how to proceed, though the problem remains at large.

The recent example is a piece by Philip Giraldi on the Unz.com, which still produces waves on the web. In his piece he rolled the list of Jews who were keen on Iraq invasion, and who are pushing the US now into an attack on Iran: “David Frum, Max Boot, Bill Kristol and Bret Stephens, Mark Dubowitz, Michael Ledeen… And yep, they’re all Jewish, plus most of them would self-describe as neo-conservatives.”

Giraldi proposed to keep Jews out of the positions of influence on the foreign affairs, in order to keep the US out of wars it does not need. Giraldi wrote: “We don’t need a war with Iran because Israel wants one and some rich and powerful American Jews are happy to deliver.”

Actually, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz wrote at the time (in April 2003): “The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history. Two of them, journalists William Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, say it’s possible.”

I also wrote things in the same vein during Iraq invasion, and it is good to see that this thesis did not die but keeps resurging from time to time. One could add that these very persons are pushing for conflict with Russia, demonise Putin and attack Trump, though the Orange Man tries to fulfil their wishes as an eager Santa Claus of diligent Lizzie.

While agreeing with Giraldi on the malady, let us discuss the remedy. Would keeping Jews out of foreign policy making actually help? Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s? The Jews weren’t specially prominent before that time, and certainly weren’t overrepresented in the establishment. A Jewish couple, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg has been fried on the electric chair in 1953, and there were few objections. McCarthy terrorized Jews. The word Holocaust had yet to make its first appearance (in 1968). Jews were still kept out of clubs and out of high level politics. Israel had been threatened by the US (in 1956) rather than assisted.

And still, the free-from-Jews US had fought in Korea the terrible three-year long war (1950-1953), and in Vietnam (up to 1974), invaded and caused regime change in Guatemala and Iran, violently interfered in elections in France and Italy, and had fought the fierce Cold War against the USSR. In all these campaigns, the US Jews were actually for peace and against war. The Jews were nowhere in power when the US fought its wars against Spain and Mexico. The non-Jewish US made a coup in Iran, and non-Jewish and not-pro-Israel President Carter tried to invade Iran. Jews weren’t involved in the conquest of Panama, in Nicaragua intervention, in Granada operation.

Perhaps the Jews had moved the arena of wars to the Middle East and out of Latin America. Less Jewish-influenced America would rather invade Venezuela than Iraq or Iran. But is it so wonderful?

The idea of correcting or channelling the excessive Jewish influence is a reasonable one, but can this goal be achieved by keeping Kristol and Krauthammer out of media (an excellent thought anyway)?

The Jewish prominence in the US is inbuilt in the US culture and tradition. Karl Marx wrote that “in North America, the practical domination of Judaism over the Christian world has achieved as its unambiguous and normal expression”. He said that all Yankees are Jews, behave like Jews, aspire to be Jews and even are circumcised like Jews. So it is natural that real Jews succeed better in being Jews than their Gentile neighbours. Werner Sombart added that Jews were prominent from the very dawn of America and they created American-style capitalism the way that fits them. The Jews are prominent now because America is custom-built for Jews to fit and suit them, he said.

This is what should be corrected, and then the Jewish scribes, these Krauthammers will be out of business of inciting wars. Stop subscribing to Jewish success model, and the Jews won’t be able to influence the Senate. Make the US Christian as Christ taught, share labour and wealth, aspire to God instead of Mammon, make the first last and the last first, love thy neighbour and the problem will be solved.

If this is too tall an order, make it a smaller one. Unseating Ledeens and Frums (and I think they deserve tar and feathers all right) will not do the trick unless the rich Jews are un-wealthed. Without excessive Jewish wealth, there will be no excessive Jewish push for wars. And provided that more than half of all US wealth is in few Jewish hands, freeing it will make a colossal effect of improving life of every American, even every person on earth.

ORDER IT NOW

And why to stop there? The super-rich non-Jews are as Jewish as any Jew. They share the same aspirations. Strip them of their assets. Why should we worry whether Jeff Bezos is a Jew by blood or faith, or he is not? He behaves like a Jew, and that is enough. Establish a ceiling of wealth, a counterpart of minimal wage. This idea has been mulled: Jeremy Corbyn called for the maximum wage. Taxes can do it easily – in wonderful Sweden of 1950s, top tax rate was 102%. Or this can be achieved in a more festive way of stripping the richest men of their ill-gotten wealth on the main square of Washington, DC on Mardi Gras Sunday. Do not say this is a punishment for their diligence – other way around, this is assistance on their way to spiritual improvement. Too many assets imprison the spirit.

This would be good for Jews and for all concerned: while the average Jewish wealth in the US had been lagging below total average (that is as long as Jews were less wealthy than Gentiles), the Jews acted in the interests of the people. Around 1968-1970 the Jews became more wealthy than all Americans, and that was it: they ceased to strive for the common good.

Jews could be a force for good if their excessive tendency to collect material goods is nipped in the bud. So it was in the USSR: as the Jews could not make money, they went into science and worked for the common good. Even oligarchs could be good managers instead of pain in the neck for the society.

This is not more complicated than booting Max Boot out of writing business. So why to go for a palliative if you can go for the jugular?

Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@israelshamir.net

This article was first published at The Unz Review.

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Military, Israel Lobby, Jews 
Hide 165 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI…

    Read More
    • Replies: @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    The US entered WWI in 1917
    , @Alfred
    WWI was planned and executed to plan by a British elite - just like the 2 Boer wars. In all these wars, wealthy Jewish bankers helped get them started - the Cassels and the Rothschilds principally. Many leading British politicians - e.g. Winston Churchill and his father - were deeply in debt to these people. The much touted "Balfour Declaration" was the product of a British prime minister who was in debt to them - as was his uncle Lord Salisbury.

    Randolph Churchill died with debts of the order of $8m in today's money to these bankers. It is all well-documented.

    Suggested reading:

    "The Secret Origins of the First Wold War" by Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor

    https://amzn.com/1780576307

    However, blaming ordinary Jews or American Jews for WWI is as ridiculous as blaming the French for their corrupt Poincaré or the ordinary British for the warmonger Churchill.
    , @Tom Welsh
    It's quite hard to know such things for certain, since a lot of highly-paid professional effort has gone into concealing them from public scrutiny.

    For some reason I am reminded of George Carlin's weirdly logical observation, "One can never know for sure what a deserted area looks like".
    , @Wrenchturner
    This is typical obfuscation. Goyim we didn't have power we just controlled the newspapers.
    , @Marlowe
    It was 1916 when the US entered WW1. The jews pushed them in via the banks.
    , @hyperbola
    Well 1913 was an important milestone, but started much earlier.

    An Essay On The History Of Banking
    A Historical Perspective: The Banking Monopoly
    https://criminalbankingmonopoly.wordpress.com/
    , @Debbie Menon
    When did it all start?

    The answer to the question came from an Israeli diplomat who lectured to a class at Georgetown in the late 1980s, I am told by Professor Alan Sabrosky, who taught at the University, a course on Comparative Foreign Policy, among others, and had 3-4 diplomats from different countries in to the class each semester that at dinner with the Israeli diplomat and two students, he remarked during the conversation that the real turning point in Israel's approach to the US had come in the wake of the 1956 War, when President Eisenhower had ordered Israel, Britain and France to "cease & desist" and return home. He said the Israeli Embassy tried to get to Congress to reverse that decision, and found that in fact they had access to only two "minor Congressional offices" (his phrase, I remember it clearly says Prof. Alan Sabrosky). So, they set about crafting a network of PACs and other things to reverse that state of affairs. One of the students asked "how many Congressional offices they could access successfully now?" (that was in late 1980s please note)-- and with a satisfied smile, he remarked "Almost all of them." The students faces registered astonishment, so he quickly added words to the effect that "But of course, we don't control them, they still act in the best interests of the American people," but the students didn't believe him, and there you have it...."

    I suppose when so many people in comparable positions have a consensus on something (like "thou shalt not allow criticism of Israel"), you don't need a conspiracy. There are so many Jewish PACs, besides AIPAC. There exists a coordinating agency called "The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations," Their website (www.conferenceofpresidents.org/) is worth exploring (and AIPAC is just one of literally dozens of organizations under its umbrella).

    http://www.payvand.com/news/09/feb/1141.html
    , @Alden
    A few US history books barely mention that we borrowed 13 billion in 1773 currency from the French government.

    Very few US history books mention that the French government borrowed that 13 billion from the Grand Duke of Hesse and other Frankfort Germany bankers including Meyer Rothschild.

    So Jewish bankers were involved from the beginning. And all during the 1850s Confederate emissaries were in Europe begging for loans from largely Jewish bankers. That's why they sent Judah Benjamin to manage their investment during the civil war.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /ishamir/philip-giraldis-remedy-for-wars/#comment-2022242
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. First, abolish the Federal Reserve.

    Second, change the notion of ‘representing’ in Congress. It currently means ‘to bring as much Federal largess as possible back to the home district’. It should be changed to mean ‘to come from a given district’. Enact measures to restrict the ability of our representatives and senators to benefit personally from their legislative actions. Reducing the pool of available largess would be a good start. That would naturally result from the elimination of the income tax, which would be made possible by the elimination of the Federal Reserve (see ‘First’ above).

    This is simple stuff, made to seem difficult only by the propaganda of those who are benefiting from the status quo.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Making all public elections in the USA public funded only, breaking the laws is a criminal offense with minimum 10 years inprisonment. Limit the Congressmen to two terms and their terms end at the same time. These two actions is way more simpler and effective to get rid of the special interest groups controlling the Congress and the Administration.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. @Anonymous
    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI...

    The US entered WWI in 1917

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
    The U.S. declared war on Germany in 1917 but the FED allowed the U.S. Government to finance the war effort of Britain and their allies by the fiat money that the FED created. The scoundrel Woodrow Wilson became president on an anti war platform while all along he was preparing for the U.S. entry into WWI under the influence of the illuminati Colonel Edward House and the mega millionaire Bernard Baruch.
    The rest is history. But one thing we cannot deny is that the biggest disaster for Europe was the U.S. involvement into the European mayhem. That American interference led to the refusal of Britain to negotiate a peaceful settlement of the war on a a status quo ante which the Germans offered from a position of power in 1916 ( for further information on the subject check Benjamin Freedman lecture on the subject of WWI) This American involvement, which was backed by Jewish controlled media and the military industrial complex was a prelude to the modus operandi that fuelled the recent wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and the one under planning against Iran.
    So, yes indeed the American historic drive to wars, from those fought against the native Americans to those fought against Canada in 1812 and Mexico in 1846, were not triggered by the influence of the Jews the way it is done today with the U.S. media under the control of Zionist Jews, but the Rothchild Jews were then just as now a key player in the American war drive, and the war of 1812 had to do with the renewal of the charter of the Central Bank of the U.S. more than any geopolitical consideration.
    , @pyrrhus
    Yes, though the Jewish Wall Streeters pushed for it as part of the Balfour Declaration deal...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Israel Shamir is an entertaining writer and sometimes informative (especially about Russia). But he is prone to hyperbole. For example:

    [N]on-Jewish and not-pro-Israel President Carter tried to invade Iran …

    Perhaps the Jews had moved the arena of wars to the Middle East and out of Latin America. Less Jewish-influenced America would rather invade Venezuela than Iraq or Iran. But is it so wonderful?

    – Shamir

    The Special Forces operation to extract USA’s hostages in Iran fell way short of anything that anyone would call an “invasion.” As for Venezuela:

    Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) fired back at President Trump on Friday, saying Congress “obviously isn’t authorizing war in Venezuela” after Trump said he wouldn’t rule out using a military option in the country.

    “No, Congress obviously isn’t authorizing war in Venezuela,” Sasse, a member of the Senate Armed Services committee, said in a statement. “Nicolas Maduro is a horrible human being, but Congress doesn’t vote to spill Nebraskans’ blood based on who the Executive lashes out at today.”

    – The Hill

    This entire article is based on Shanir’s exaggerationa: First, as I recall, Giraldi never suggested any form of censorship of news media or commentary; more likely Giraldi would like to see effectively less censorship, especially censorship on behalf of Israel and Zionism. Second, Giraldi, as I recall, never made his suggestions as promising an end to war in general. Third, Giraldi never suggested that removing Jews from positions of influence relating to USA’s global security/strategy would keep the USA out of all unnecessary wars, only that it would help in getting the USA out of unnecessary wars in the ME — wars that do not enhance and indeed detract from our national security.

    I feel certain that Giraldi knows as much as anyone about the evil influence of the Military Industrial Congressional Complex — which obviously includes major gentile players as well as Zionist neocons. For me, the matter is simple: anyone whose loyalty is divided between the USA and Israel should be barred from any position of influence in USA’s military or related governmental activities. The same is true for anyone whose loyalty is divided between the USA and the People’s Republic of China … or Ireland or Russia or the Vatican … or wherever.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie
    It occurs to me that it's possible that Shamir intended the article as humor, as camp, as a parody of ((anti-Jewish)) commentary here at UR. It's complicated.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Edgar says:

    It’s been a week or so since I read Giraldi’s piece, but I recall him saying keep Jews in the US out of policy matters relating to Israel. “Put the Jewish members in charge of Korea Policy. . . ” I believe was Giraldi’s example. You seem to be punching a straw man with your otherwise pedestrian argument. But thanks for supporting Giraldi’s basic thesis!

    Now these pitiful William-F-Buckley-tards should put Giraldi’s article back up; Shamir confirms that Giraldi is right.

    Read More
    • Agree: Grandpa Charlie
    • Replies: @Anon
    Yes, at least Shamir confirms that Giraldi is right. But, off and on, Shamir has been frivolous in recent years (even gatekeeping for "US" warmongering ZioPsychopaths) and it may be as much a curse as a blessing.
    , @hyperbola

    """It’s been a week or so since I read Giraldi’s piece, but I recall him saying keep Jews in the US out of policy matters relating to Israel. “Put the Jewish members in charge of Korea Policy. . . ” """"
     
    Actually we already tried that during the Reagan administration. At the time letting the ZionCons loose in Central America produced the first several million refugees in the US.

    How Neocons Destabilized Europe – Consortiumnews
    https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/07/how-neocons-destabilized-europe/
    ..... When I first encountered the neocons in the 1980s, they had been given Central America to play with. President Ronald Reagan had credentialed many of them, bringing into the U.S. government neocon luminaries such as Elliott Abrams and Robert Kagan. But Reagan mostly kept them out of the big-power realms: the Mideast and Europe.

    Those strategic areas went to the “adults,” people like James Baker, George Shultz, Philip Habib and Brent Scowcroft. The poor Central Americans, as they tried to shed generations of repression and backwardness imposed by brutal right-wing oligarchies, faced U.S. neocon ideologues who unleashed death squads and even genocide against peasants, students and workers.

    The result not surprisingly was a flood of refugees, especially from El Salvador and Guatemala, northward to the United States. The neocon “success” in the 1980s, crushing progressive social movements and reinforcing the oligarchic controls, left most countries of Central America in the grip of corrupt regimes and crime syndicates, periodically driving more waves of what Reagan called “feet people” through Mexico to the southern U.S. border...
    _________________________________________________________________

    AND, we still suffer the damage from EVER letting ZionCons be involved in US foreign policy. These are (religious) crime sects/mafias that should be cleaned out of both our government and media.


    London Editor Proposes British Honduras Be Turned into Jewish State
    http://www.jta.org/1939/01/08/archive/london-editor-proposes-british-honduras-be-turned-into-jewish-state
    A suggestion that British Honduras be transformed into a Jewish State under the joint protection of Great Britain and the United States was made today by W.E. Simnett, editor of the Crown Colonist,....

    The Jewish families that run Honduras
    https://dagobertobellucci.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/the-jewish-families-that-run-honduras/

    THE ISRAELI CONNECTION TO THE HONDURAN COUP
    https://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/the-israeli-connection-to-the-honduran-coup/

    No es casual la presencia del MOSSAD en Honduras
    http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=93190

    Hillary Lost My Vote in Honduras
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/02/hillary-lost-my-vote-in-honduras/

    Hillary Clinton is lying about the criminal U.S.-backed coup in Honduras.
    http://www.salon.com/2016/04/15/hillary_clinton_is_lying_about_the_criminal_u_s_backed_coup_in_honduras_it_should_be_as_scandalous_as_libya/

    Before Her Murder, Berta Cáceres Singled Out Hillary Clinton for Criticism
    The presidential candidate has ignored criticism of her role in enabling the consolidation of the Honduran coup.
    http://www.thenation.com/article/chronicle-of-a-honduran-assassination-foretold/

    Honduras and Israel: A New Special Relationship
    Just as it serviced murderous regimes in Central America in the 1980s, Israel will now be exporting forms of repression to Honduras’ abusive government.
    https://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/Honduras-and-Israel-A-New-Special-Relationship-20160825-0008.html#comsup

    And, of course, the sect is now fully into exploiting the success of their coup in Honduras.
    Archaeology, Biology, Appropriation, and Empire in Honduras
    http://www.unz.com/plee/archaeology-biology-appropriation-and-empire-in-honduras/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. wayfarer says:

    Rothschild Zionists
    Est. 1813
    “We Finance Serial-Murder!”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie
    This illustrates how entirely minimalist Giraldi is in his discussion that is tangential to the question as to whether or not there are Zionist neocons working within the govt. of the USA who are actually guilty of treason to some degree or another.

    Giraldi does not even broach 9-11 truth ... he is very careful, circumspect and minimalist in everything he writes, perhaps because he is dogged by the CIA or perhaps because he anticipates being called to testify before a grand jury some day soon, not as a defendant but as an expert witness. Or maybe it's just that he has too much respect for the truth to engage in hyperbole.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. While agreeing with Giraldi on the malady, let us discuss the remedy. Would keeping Jews out of foreign policy making actually help? Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s? The Jews weren’t specially prominent before that time, and certainly weren’t overrepresented in the establishment.

    This is an interesting question, but there is a difference between Then and Now.

    In the past, US expansionism was part of the global norm. Imperialism was common and accepted all over the world. Ottomans ruled over a giant empire. Russians kept expanding into Siberia and Central Asia. It also swallowed parts of Central Europe. Manchus took over China and gobbled up more territory as part of Chinese empire. There were native imperialist wars in Africa before white man came. And Mexico was also the product of empire building. Spanish took it from Aztec Imperialists, and the Conquis took more land. And Spanish also took Philippines. Brits and French were creating vast empires. US was created out of empire-building and continued as such.

    So, US warmongering in the past was part of the world norm. Everyone did it. Also, empire-building was seen as glorious for the Whole People. So, even though the elites benefited the most, there was a sense of shared glory among all Britons over the British Empire. All Frenchmen were to share the glory of the French Empire. And US expansion into SW territories was great not only for elites but for Anglo settlers who built new lives in those areas. And it was even good for Mexers in the region because Anglos did so much than Mexers had done before when SW territories had belonged to Mexico. It’s like Ramon has it pretty good working for gringos. He was like the Guillermo of his day.

    So, imperial wars were once part of the norm, and all peoples took part in it. Even small powers did. If not for French Imperialism, the mini-imperialism of the Thais and Viets would have wiped Cambodia off the map. And of course, American Indians had been like childish savages ‘genociding’ one another before the white man came.

    The glory belonged to ALL the people. It was not just an elite thing. So, when Brits took over India, even British masses could go to India and enjoy the glory of calling a person-of-dot a ‘brown sammy’. So, there was shared glory for all people as fellow rulers of the empire. The elites got to lord over the empire, and the white masses got to enjoy privileges too, like calling a person-of-dot a ‘bloody coon’.

    [MORE]

    And when Anglo Empire spread across the ‘fruited plains’(now the fruity plains), little people gained along with the big people. Sure, the big industrialists got more, but little folks got their little house on the prairie too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt4z16n-3eU

    But then, with the spread of nationalism all around the world and the rise of native elites who felt slighted by European imperialists with their exclusive all-white clubs, there was an anti-imperialist uprising that finally exploded in the 20th century and achieved its goals after WWII when European imperialist nations were on the ropes and bankrupt.

    Still, before imperialism came to be a bad idea, it had been part of the world norm among all peoples… even though Europeans extended it farther than any previous civilization. So, warmongering back then was different from warmongering in the post WWII era. During the Cold War, there was nothing worse than imperialism in the eyes of the world community, at least ideally. This was rather ironic since both US and USSR were great empires or neo-empires that used quasi-imperialist modes in the name of combating imperialism, be it communist or capitalist.

    Cold War was a strange phenom because it exerted great imperialist energies against the threat of the Other imperialism. Pax Americana portrayed itself as representing the ‘Free World’ against Soviet-Communist Imperialist aggression that held Eastern Europe captive and funded fanatics in Asia, Africa, and Latin America to spread the Marxist virus. In Afghanistan, US purported to back the ‘freedom fighters’ against Soviet Imperialist occupation.

    Soviets did the same thing against the US. Soviets argued capitalism can only be imperialist. So, US support of right-wing autocrats all over the world was part of the American Imperialist world order. Pax Sovietica promised justice and equality for all peoples under the liberating cause of communism or related ideologies.

    And even though some today say the Cold War was exaggerated and overblown, it was a real conflict between giants. Both great powers did horrible things to win the war or to contain the enemy and to bribe its allies(or puppets). So, the warmongering during that period has to be seen as part of a worldwide struggle. A real struggle of History, as Fukuyama would say.

    So, even though US warmongering and aggression in the past(when Jews did not control America) had their dark side, they were part of the world norm OR part of a great Historical struggle between ideologies, the two that triumphed in WWII with the demise of German, French, British, and Japanese empires.

    But, things are different today. US is the lone superpower and stronger than ever. And yet, all this might is being used to serve the interests of the 2% of the population. Actually, closer to 0.2% of the population, the Jewish globalist elites as most American Jews may not be crazy about all this saber-rattling and grow increasingly critical of Israel’s reckless policies.

    Whatever one may say of past imperialism, it served the entire people. When US took SW areas from Mexico, it was for ALL Americans to share in the booty and free tacos. But when US makes a mess of Middle East and North Africa(nations hated by Israel), what do most Americans get from it? Nothing.
    Also, if warmongering during the Cold War had some overarching purpose in the Grand Struggle of ideologies and powers, the new wars are totally petty and narrowly tribal in design. Sure, some neocons try to portray it as a new Grand Struggle. World War IV as Podhoretz called it.

    https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/world-war-iv-how-it-started-what-it-means-and-why-we-have-to-win/

    9/11 was bad stuff, but US was at war with a bunch of ragtag terrorists. How is that WWIV? And what did Iraq have to do with it? If anything, Hussein(vile nasty bugger that he was) ruthlessly clamped down on terrorists. And how could the world have so many ‘new hitlers’? Lately, Putin became ‘new hitler’ ever since he said NO to Poo-Ride parades and ‘gay marriage’ in Russia. Most perversely, the War on Terror soon morphed into War with Terror. Under Obama, the US was actually working with remnants of Alqaeda(rebranded as ‘moderate rebels’) to undermine secular modern regimes that kept order and stability in the region. It is incredible that Americans aren’t outraged that the war that began against the terrorists who did 9/11 eventually metastasized into war with terrorists against the only secular regimes in the region. (But then, even 9/11 was mostly blowback for US policy in the Middle East. Iran and Iraq had NOTHING to do with it. It was US and Saudis that had funded and created Jihadi forces, esp in Afghanistan, to use against the Soviets and then Iran. US was attacked by the very monster it created with the help of Saudis. Indeed, it is telling that after 9/11, the US did nothing against the very nation, Saudi Arabia, that had been most instrumental in working with US to create monsters like Osama and others. But since Saudis are allies of the US, the Jewish media moguls and deep state overlooked that key detail and spun wild crazy theories about how Iraq and Iran must be destroyed to stop terrorism. What a sick world.)

    All of this was hype. Speak pushily and carry a big Shtick. Cold War may have been exaggerated but it was real enough. Soviets were a great power and did rule over Eastern Europe. And if China had kept good relations with Russia and Mao had more economic sense, the Sino-Soviet alliance might have kept the Cold War going for much longer. Imagine if, with some economic reforms, Chinese labor had combined with Soviet resources and knowhow. Communist power would have been much more formidable. But Mao had a peasant mentality and didn’t get modernity.

    Anyway, the nature of today’s wars are far more perverse because the world norm has been anti-imperialist since the end of WWII. So, why is US acting like an imperialist power in a world that has no place for imperialism? US freaks out about Russia ‘invading’ Crimea(when it wasn’t invaded) but it feels it has the right to make threats to other nations and wreck Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and maybe Iran and Venezuela too? The fact that most of these victims of US happen to be nations esp hated by Jewish globalists is proof enough that Jewish tribal hostility is at the center of it.

    During the Cold War, many people on both sides knew there were abuses. Surely, there were people in Soviet Union who felt bad about Russian domination over Hungary in 56 and Czechoslovakia in 68. And there were Americans who were sickened by US meddling in Latin America and Asia. But they were seen as maybe necessary because of the domino theory. Soviets felt that if they let one nation go, all others might follow. US felt that if it lost Vietnam, others might follow.

    But we now live in a world that could be peaceful. The world no longer believes in empire. There is no great ideological struggle. Some call West vs Islam a ‘clash of civilizations’, but it could easily be solved by ending mass immigration or colonization and also be end of US meddling in the Middle East. Leave those people alone. It is Jewish-Israeli paranoia about Iran and Syria and all the rest that led to these useless wars that serve NO ONE but Israel and Jewish globalist-Zionist interests.

    Fukuyama is a real globalist shi*, but he was right in the sense that there is no longer any great ideological struggle. There are Big Ideas but they are hyped and bloated, like homomania or queertianity, which is Jewish proxy of ersatz-christianity.

    If the world just wanted to get along and do business, we could do that and have peace and stability, the kind hoped for by Steven Pinker in BETTER DEVILS OF OUR NATURE.

    Japan doesn’t want to fight wars. European nations don’t want to conquer nations overseas. Russia wants trade, not more wars. It doesn’t even want to take back Lithuania and Estonia. It is even reluctant to take Donbass. China just wants more economic ties. Chinese don’t want to have military bases all over nor does it want to export Chinese-ness as world standard. Chinese don’t think ‘inside every barbarian is a chinaman trying to get out’. Latin America shelved the old struggles. There was a time when every Latin American nation had a serious Marxist insurgency. That is all gone.

    So, what is driving all this madness that is making 21st century into a hellhole?

    1. It is Jewish globalist greed in foreign policy. The desire to use US power to further Jewish Might, esp in the Middle East. As Jews control the US and EU(as vassals of US), they have the two richest parts of the world. But Jews also want to take control of vast Russia with all its resources. The only thing stopping such ambition is Russian nationalism, and this is why Jews seek to undermine it with appeals to ‘democracy’ and homomania. One problem with this is the goals are too narrow. Jews simply don’t identify with most gentiles who make up nations like US or Russia. When Anglos ruled, sure the elites took most for themselves. But they still felt something for the masses. Putin feels something for fellow Russians. Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt felt something for the white masses. Even though they were elites, they were of the same stock as the masses. But Jews don’t feel any affinity with the goyim. Sure, Jews will make temporary alliances. So, Jews will unite with Christians against Muslims and then later unite with Muslims against Christians or do both at the same time… like today. Jews will make white Christians hate ‘muzzies’ and drop bombs in the Middle East.. and then hug Muslim ‘refugees’ and pretend to protect them from ‘racist white Christians’. Jewish contempt for goyim is too deep. Not all Jews feel this way, but many powerful Jews do have this animus. Chinese elites are lowdown and dirty, a bunch of snakes, BUT they feel some sense of solidarity with other Chinese as fellow countrymen. But Jews don’t feel any such for the white masses, the ‘deplorables’ who are hurting. They pretend to care for blacks, but then go about welcoming immigration-colonization to replace urban blacks with Asians, Hindus, Arabs, and Mesos.

    In a way, Jews feel it is to their benefit for the world to be in a state of flux and crisis. After all, if all nations were stable and at peace, they would look to their own domestic affairs. And then, each nation will ask itself, “who has the most power and privilege in our nation?”, and the finger might point to Jews. So, in order for nations around the world to not notice Jewish power, they must be made to feel hostility against one another. So, if Americans are angry with Russians, they won’t notice who really rules America. That way, Jews can play the role of ‘patriots’ defending US from Russian ‘aggression’ and ‘influence’. And if Americans are made to hate Iran(as an ‘existential threat’), then they won’t ask questions about who really rules US foreign policy and why. And why not push some Yellow Peril so that Americans will think China is behind everything… even as Jews played a huge role in bringing China into the globalist economic system. Do business with China but use media power to make China out to be the Princess Dragon Mom.

    If you’re a coyote, it’s better to have bears, tigers, lions, buffaloes, and etc hate and fight one another. That way, they might not notice you. It’s like what the woman does in RASHOMON. She makes her husband and the bandit fight one another while she runs away. It’s like YOJIMBO where the ronin makes one clan fight the other clan while sitting pretty in between.

    2. But there is even a bigger threat that will mess up all nations in the 21st century. It is mass migration and demographic imperialism. No group has been more responsible in pushing this than the Jews. This will spell doom and end for Europe and possibly for East Asia and Australia/New Zealand as well. And Canada and US. Europe is esp in trouble as it’s being flooded with black Africans who are more muscled, more aggressive, more loutish, and bigger-donged than white men. As Europe is Africanized, white men will be wussified and white women will be womb-colonized into creating vile creatures like Obama and Kaepernick. Europe will become like Morocco or worse.
    With control of Media, Academia, and the Sacred Narrative, Jews have persuaded all these naive native whites into embracing Diversity, Jungle Fever, Replacism, and ‘White Guilt and Atonement’ as the only way forward. And US is no different.

    For a time following WWII, there was the golden age of universal nationalism when all peoples aspire to be independent and have national independence. At the UN, it was agreed that imperialism is wrong in any part of the world. So, the end of the Cold War seemed to promise the end of imperialism. Indeed, even the first Gulf War was billed as anti-imperialist as Iraq invaded Kuwait. But this act of anti-imperialism and limited war soon turned into prelude for More Wars of even greater imperialist designs. I mean Hussein was small potatoes in grabbing only Kuwait. US will grab entire big nations, at least if Jewish globalists want them occupied or destroyed.

    Anyway, the golden age of nationalism could have been realized to its fullness with the end of the Cold War. The Cold War necessitated both US and USSR to act like imperialist powers in the grand struggle. But with no more such struggle, each people could finally be independent. Indeed, the liberation of each Eastern European nation was seen as the new promise of nationalism. Iron Curtain was no more. Also, the Soviet Union itself birthed many new nations. Russian empire finally came to an end. And it was mostly done peacefully. There was war in Yugoslavia, but at the end of the day, peace was achieved with rise of new nations.
    And it could have been a happy story. And most peoples would have been content with this triumph of Universal Nationalism.

    So, what destroyed it? One was US-warmongering in Middle East and North Africa that led to huge ‘refugee’ crisis. Another was rise of PC in EU that somehow made ‘diversity’ sacrosanct. So, it was the duty of white nations to keep allowing in tons of non-whites on some crazy notion that more diversity is good. (If so, why is Latin America and North Africa such a mess?)

    But even more dangerous was the alliance between Jewish globalists and non-white elites & masses all over the world. Non-whites who had once resisted and fought Western Imperialists and told whites to GO HOME now decided to shift into Demographic Imperialist Mode and invade white nations. The reason was crass and obvious. They made a mess of things in their own nations with corruption, violence, and barbarism. And they wanted short-cut to material comfort and social stability in the West. So, these non-whites went from ‘whites go home’ to ‘whites, you better let me in’. And it was Jewish Power that pulled the strings to pressure white nations to take in these POC.
    POC found PC very useful as a moral cover for their crassness. In reality, they failed their own nations and want to flee from their own people and culture to enjoy better material lives in white-made nations. But that would sound crass and shameful. It would mean they would rather run to white success than fix their own failures. So, PC is so useful because it justifies non-white invasion of white nations in moral terms: redress or reparations for white ‘exploitation’ in the past. Just a lot of crock. POC and PC has led to a strange phenom of “whitey, I hate you, so please let me come live with you”.

    So, universal nationalism was destroyed by this new virulent form of globalism. If the West had not allowed mass immigration, non-whites would have worked hard to make their own nations better. But once the gates were open, non-whites figured it would be much easier and faster to have a good life by just moving to the West. Also, it was a great disaster in allowing non-white elites into white elite institutions. When white elites used to send signals like ‘no dogs and chinese allowed’, non-whites felt slighted and angry and decided to lead their own people in national struggles. But now that Western elite institutions let in non-white elites, the latter would rather join the Elysium club and collaborate with globalist Jews/whites than work for their own kind. This had led to Diversity of Privilege where elites of all color rub shoulders in hogging power, privilege, and influence. In contrast, masses get Diversity of Poverty. While white elites rub shoulders with fancy mulattoes and sophisticated people-of-dot, white masses get punched by nasty thug Negroes and must smell hindu fart in elevators.

    So, they effectively became demographic imperialism, and so, we are moved back into the Age of Empire. Indeed, it is much worse than past imperialism. Back then, whites, the most advanced peoples, went to less developed places and spread science and technology. Also, except for the New World(and Australia), whites didn’t have the numbers to replace the natives. So, Africa is still black, South Asia is still brown, and East Asia is still yellow.
    But the current demographic tide into the West will turn white nations into mulatto nations. France will become Morocco-Cameroon. Germany will become Nigeria-Turkey. Sweden will become Somalia-Afghanistan. Why would Jews do something so terrible? After all, Jews are adamant about keeping Israel Jewish and they don’t take in any Africans or new Muslims. Jews do this to white nations because they ONLY care about their own power. Jews figure that if all white nations are made ‘diverse’, there won’t be sufficient white solidarity to work against Jews. Also, whites will be too busy bickering with Africans and Muslims to deal with Jews. Also, Jews will work both sides. Jews will go to the non-whites and say, “we are your allies against nazi ‘racist’ whites” and Jews will go to whites and plead, “Oh help us poor poor Jews from those terrorist antisemitic Muzzies who are like the new nazis.”

    As the result of current trends, the 21st century will be even more crucial than the 20th century. It will determine if the West and white race survive at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    Perhaps you should make an alliance with others that have been equally abused by the jews? In fact, even by the very same jews. Might be more effective than allowing yourself to be "divided and conquered"?


    Controller Houses Of The East India Company: EIC Series Part IV
    http://greatgameindia.com/controller-houses-east-india-company-eic-series-part-iv/

    East India Company’s trade was divided into many parts and a particular family owned each part. They were given full control over a nation under consideration. They developed local industrial/business house, through which they exploited the independent nations. So for people of any nation, it is the local industrial house that comes to light as the exploiter and not EICs. Even today these Houses control most
    of the MNCs we see and follow the same Ideology & Methodology as the EICs.

    In the previous parts of this ongoing East India Company Series we examined the origin of these EICs, their motives and the motives of Multi National Corporations (MNCs). We also examined the commodities EICs dealt with and MNCs plan to deal with or are already dealing with along with the unique philosophical outlook that determined their ideology and methodology and gave them the opportunity to trade in goods like narcotics, which can destroy human civilization.

    With this background we now study the EICs and MNCs operatives or controller families. EIC trade as mentioned earlier was divided into many parts and a particular family owned a particular part. For example, the growing of opium and collecting taxes in India was owned by EIC and its paid officials or after 1837 by the British government itself. But the House of Sassoon’s handled the trading in opium and other goods in India. Thereafter, the House of Jardine and Matheson handled their distribution in China and the House of Inchapes handled the shipping of these goods. House of Openheimers/Rhodes handled the gold and diamond mining business. The American operations were handled by the House of Rockefellers, Seagrams, Sassoons, Japhets, Jardine – Mathesons etc. The Houses of Rothschilds and Warburgs coordinated the banking aspect of this trade. Apart from theses, Houses of Lloyds, Abes and Astors assisted these operations by insuring the business of EICs. Even today these houses control most of the MNCS we see. We do an in-depth study of Rothschilds and Rockefellers and at the end give a list of Indian MNCs, only to show how most of these belong to only one single group run by a single family which was associated with the EIC owners, by either business or marriage.......
    , @anon
    I was totally with your generally very intelligent comment up until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade, you need to deal with that. White men's contempt for a particular people make those people more of a curiousity to their womenfolk as in if you try to hide a loaf of bread from someone they are going to want it more. Its that and also the glamorization of athletes in general to hero status. Not to mention, if you hate a people because of your own insecurities, your women know your truth. Also, You must not know a lot of black men to realize how human and insecure they also are, they have the same problems with women that any other men would have and they also pay a major price for the myopic promotion of urban black culture in America and Europe.

    But everything else you said is serious food for thought and very enlightening and well said.

    , @druid
    911 was an inside job!
    , @peterAUS

    The elites got to lord over the empire, and the white masses got to enjoy privileges too, like calling a person-of-dot a ‘bloody coon’.
     

    But, things are different today. US is the lone superpower and stronger than ever. And yet, all this might is being used to serve the interests of the 2% of the population.
     
    NOW we are talking.
    So, all that was O.K. before because a common person in US had benefits he/she wanted.
    But, NOW, he/she doesn’t share those benefits. So, it’s not O.K.

    So, if benefits were shared now, that (imperialism, war etc…) would be O.K. again.

    Whoah.

    Nice.

    We remove those Jews, get back to “our” bunch and voila….we are back to business.
    Same business for the rest of the world, just it benefits US now.

    Nice…..very….very nice…….

    Why nobody said all that before?

    No need for all this…blathereing….”erudite philosophy” etc.
    We……….just…………want………….SPOILS………of…………..The……..Empire.
    They have it, we want it, let's get it.

    Just

    for ALL Americans to share in the booty
     
    ………..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Alfred says:
    @Anonymous
    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI...

    WWI was planned and executed to plan by a British elite – just like the 2 Boer wars. In all these wars, wealthy Jewish bankers helped get them started – the Cassels and the Rothschilds principally. Many leading British politicians – e.g. Winston Churchill and his father – were deeply in debt to these people. The much touted “Balfour Declaration” was the product of a British prime minister who was in debt to them – as was his uncle Lord Salisbury.

    Randolph Churchill died with debts of the order of $8m in today’s money to these bankers. It is all well-documented.

    Suggested reading:

    “The Secret Origins of the First Wold War” by Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor

    https://amzn.com/1780576307

    However, blaming ordinary Jews or American Jews for WWI is as ridiculous as blaming the French for their corrupt Poincaré or the ordinary British for the warmonger Churchill.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. @Grandpa Charlie
    Israel Shamir is an entertaining writer and sometimes informative (especially about Russia). But he is prone to hyperbole. For example:

    [N]on-Jewish and not-pro-Israel President Carter tried to invade Iran ...

    Perhaps the Jews had moved the arena of wars to the Middle East and out of Latin America. Less Jewish-influenced America would rather invade Venezuela than Iraq or Iran. But is it so wonderful?

    -- Shamir
     
    The Special Forces operation to extract USA's hostages in Iran fell way short of anything that anyone would call an "invasion." As for Venezuela:

    Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) fired back at President Trump on Friday, saying Congress “obviously isn’t authorizing war in Venezuela” after Trump said he wouldn’t rule out using a military option in the country.

    “No, Congress obviously isn’t authorizing war in Venezuela,” Sasse, a member of the Senate Armed Services committee, said in a statement. “Nicolas Maduro is a horrible human being, but Congress doesn’t vote to spill Nebraskans’ blood based on who the Executive lashes out at today.”


    -- The Hill
     
    This entire article is based on Shanir's exaggerationa: First, as I recall, Giraldi never suggested any form of censorship of news media or commentary; more likely Giraldi would like to see effectively less censorship, especially censorship on behalf of Israel and Zionism. Second, Giraldi, as I recall, never made his suggestions as promising an end to war in general. Third, Giraldi never suggested that removing Jews from positions of influence relating to USA's global security/strategy would keep the USA out of all unnecessary wars, only that it would help in getting the USA out of unnecessary wars in the ME -- wars that do not enhance and indeed detract from our national security.

    I feel certain that Giraldi knows as much as anyone about the evil influence of the Military Industrial Congressional Complex -- which obviously includes major gentile players as well as Zionist neocons. For me, the matter is simple: anyone whose loyalty is divided between the USA and Israel should be barred from any position of influence in USA's military or related governmental activities. The same is true for anyone whose loyalty is divided between the USA and the People's Republic of China ... or Ireland or Russia or the Vatican ... or wherever.

    It occurs to me that it’s possible that Shamir intended the article as humor, as camp, as a parody of ((anti-Jewish)) commentary here at UR. It’s complicated.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Mother Nature, no make monoliths. Monolithic nations or states do not exist, have never existed and never will.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. Kiza says:

    This article is a mix of truths and bull. But the key problem with the article is that it never mentions the main tool of the Zionists – the petrodollar and the main conduit of the Zionist power in US – The Federal Reserve. Luckily, China and Russia are working on dethroning FED by diminishing petrodollar. This will have the world-wide beneficial effect of deglobalisation: removing the ability to print money indefinitely will curb the ambitions of both “the rich Jews and the rich who want to be Jews” to rule the World. Power will become distributed again and the Jews will have to compete with the Chinese for domination.

    Diminishing petrodollar is a much healthier solution than the Marxist’s solution of removing wealth from the wealthy Jews and wannabe Jews. Once one starts removing wealth from individuals, one does not know where and when to stop.

    Read More
    • Replies: @edNels

    [Once one starts removing wealth from individuals, one does not know where and when to stop.]
     
    Nothing will be done 'cause nothing can be done. Many it seems who would benefit by a minimum wage, seem to be against it ''In Principle'', or just swaged against it by the nativist Horatio A propaganda. So the small thing of a minimum wage hasn't been successfully implemented.

    But… what if minimum wage was presented combined with a (unheard of ) ''Maximum Wage''. They better make sure that doesn't ever get started, because that would bring on a complete different dynamic. IE: as the motor mouth Zezek tells a joke from Slovenia, that a neighbor would prefer not to get a free cow, but rather to see his neighbor's cow destroyed. Base ignorant psychology.

    Combine a minimum wage…even a living stipend… with a maximum renumeration scheme, who would make that happen? the next generation or a benevolent dictator… haha.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Tom Welsh says:
    @Anonymous
    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI...

    It’s quite hard to know such things for certain, since a lot of highly-paid professional effort has gone into concealing them from public scrutiny.

    For some reason I am reminded of George Carlin’s weirdly logical observation, “One can never know for sure what a deserted area looks like”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Art says:

    Around 1968-1970 the Jews became more wealthy than all Americans, and that was it: they ceased to strive for the common good.

    For the next 30 years through excessive debt the Jew Allen Greenspan, head of the Fed, put a stake in the heart of America’s economy – end of story.

    Jew dominated corporate America turned its head away from its fiduciary responsibilities to customers, employees, neighbors, investors, and country – they instead turned to raw, naked, personal greed. Junk bonds got the ball rolling.

    In America you no longer do business with your neighbors – you must do business with Wall Street – Wall Street gets a slice of all your spending. Guess what – unlike you neighbors – Wall Street doesn’t give dam about you – PERIOD.

    Companies change ownership with the tough of a keyboard creating great uncertainty for all those invoved. This creates instability.

    Ownership must be returned to local people. Then stability will return to culture.

    Think Peace — Art

    Read More
    • Agree: John Jeremiah Smith
    • Replies: @Sherman
    Hey Genius

    "Allen Greenspan" s/b "Alan Greenspan".

    Peace
    Sherm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Remember the old adage for success in the world of WASPs: “Think Yiddish, dress British.”

    A serious case can be made for replacing the income tax, which has the potential to keep people from becoming wealthy, with a wealth tax, which has the effect of making people pay in proportion to their longer-term success and influence in the system. A millennial might say that this would be a more sustainable way to run things.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Your idea is admittedly appealing in some respects. But we should be careful what we wish for with a wealth tax.

    We might like to imagine a wealth tax hitting only "the truly rich", e.g. people with a net worth in the millions of dollars excluding their house. With the nascent Third World majority that the USA will soon have, however, it will not be hard to convince people of the "fairness" of a wealth tax that kicks in at low enough levels of wealth to hit your family and mine.

    Think that the Dems right now could get a majority of Californians to vote for a tax on all assets (including savings) held by California residents in excess of $1,000,000 per person or $2,000,000 per couple? I think they could. I think they will.

    As the State becomes even more composed of lower-income, lower-skill, less educated non-American people -- most of whom pay no federal income tax and not much state income tax -- could they eventually amend the law to include primary residences in that $500,000 or $1,000,000 threshold that triggers the wealth tax, so that most CA homeowners will be paying the new tax? You bet they will.

    The government could even include the value of retirement accounts or college-savings accounts in the net-worth calculation, extending the wealth tax to even more non-rich people. How many federal judges on the bench already, would uphold such a tax? How many federal judges will uphold such a wealth tax after the Dems get back in the White House for eight years and nominate the rest of the judiciary, as they almost inevitably will?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Randal says:

    This is not more complicated than booting Max Boot out of writing business. So why to go for a palliative if you can go for the jugular?

    If you think that imposing a general prohibitive wealth tax or somehow banning being rich is “not more complicated” than simply recognising the problems of dual loyalty and ulterior group motives, both in general and in particular relation to jewish elites, and addressing them in some form, then you would seem rather unrealistic to me.

    There has been no convincing argument raised against Giraldi’s point – the closest to a response so far seems to be the one you raise here – that jews aren’t the only people or groups pushing the US towards war, which is rather irrelevant, and the insistence that not all jewish people do so, which is both obvious and likewise irrelevant.

    Regardless, and whether or not one agrees with Giraldi’s particular diagnosis of one aspect of the ills of modern US sphere society (I do, broadly), one should support him and it anyway simply because its expression is so obviously being punished by those who seek to suppress it. His prompt dismissal by the contemptible American Conservative illustrates the truth of the point made by those who complain of politically correct censorship being used by identity lobbyists and those who kowtow to them to control dissent.

    The latter is a far bigger problem in the societies of the modern US sphere than the particular issue of foreign policy identified by Giraldi.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Flavius
    Spot on.
    Our contemptible media is having a wholesale nervous breakdown over whether a small contingent of mostly empty headed jocks should a) be subject to ordinary employment rules or b) be celebrated for exploiting their 5 minutes of ersatz fame to signal their political solidarity with an ill defined movement that cursory inspection reveals is 99% rubbish. The whole thing is set in a gilded frame so at least we get to laugh at the absurdity of the two faces side by side.
    Meanwhile the disgraceful American Conservative summarily marches Phil Girardi off the plank with a telephone call for having brushed its third rail. Why do I surmise that the call to Girardi was closely preceeded by a call from a 'donor.' Contemptible is the word. The mag hasn't the cajones to make that call to Patrick Buchanan...yet.
    Heartfelt gratitude to Phil Girardi for having exposed to the light of day the rot that has been progressing along the spine of the American Conservative for a very long time.
    , @fundamental problem
    The problem most egregious is control of information and communications. U.S. citizens lack knowledge of their Government's decisions and actions. An example of this control is Israel's deliberate attack on the U.S. "Liberty" [ship] which was in international waters. Between Johnson's collusion with Israel and a controlled media, most Americans were not then and are not now aware that the country that receives the most U.S. tax dollars attacked a U.S. ship and killed 34 sailors and wounded 170. This happened June 8, 1967. Moreover, most citizens have not been informed that Israel was selling U.S. provided technology to the Chinese which was absolutely illegal. Israel's illegal act may have been mentioned once or twice on U.S.TV networks. Has the U.S. media addressed the fact that Israel has not declared borders? How can the Palestinians recognize Israel when Israel will not acknowledge it has borders? The old canard that it is anti-Semitic to criticize Israel is used to restrict the constitutional right of free speech. If one has the legal right to criticize his/her country, one certainly has the legal right to criticize any other country on this earth without retribution! Our universities and colleges should never subject students to retribution for exercising free speech! Giraldi and many others should be published and granted time on television to rebut those presenting Israel's causes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. I like what is being said:
    Before the 1960s the Jews in the US were not occupying the front stage but their influence was far from being negligeable. They were acting like a fifth column and as such, they have been active in triggering and supporting the Bolsheviks revolution, in getting the US to enter WW I and latter on WW II.
    It is also obvious that when they were not occupying the front stage, they were courting the people in the US and in all the countries where they were living; to get accepted and their contribution to the societies was important.
    Today as they are running the show in the western world, they are acting like slaves drivers and are treating others like they treat the Palestinians.
    Having conquered the US and its dominions in Europe, they want to get the rest of the world. They never have enough. It looks like they want to take a revenge against all the others like they have done against the Russian during the revolution. They are no more working for improving the world but for running it and wreaking a revenge for having living the Diaspora .

    The only way to stop them driving us to Armageddon is to have them bankrupted; the whole world might be in jeopardy but that is the only way to avoid a nuclear apocalypse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. [Choose a single Handle and stick with it, or use Anonymous/Anon. Otherwise, your comments will be trashed.]

    I have never found Jews particularly cheap or materialistic. Maybe as a Scot I have a warped perspective. Denied the chance at noble titles or churchly favor, money has been their only path to power and distinction.What I do see as a problem is the combination of extreme ability and extreme solidarity. Put that together with their adversarial relationship to the gentile world developed over the centuries and you have a recipe for harmful culture war. Producing sexy movies and violent rap, the war on Christmas, the attempt to limit free speech — all are forms of aggression or payback for aggression, as I see it. To be sure, not all Jews or even most feel this emotion, but the ones that do work hard to promote it. According to Pew Research, 94% of self-identified Jews identify as pro-choice. The next highest group is mainline Protestants at 59%. Such a great disparity suggests to me that the issue is largely symbolic for them. I suspect you would find similar disparities on gun rights, attitudes to pornography, and religion in the public square. It’s rare for Muslims or Hindus to complain about having to hear Christmas carols, but many Jews want to sick the Homeland Security SWAT Team on the school choir if a few syllables of Hark the Herald Angels are overheard. For that reason, I feel more threatened by the billions of Adelson, Bezos, Saban, Soros, and Singer than by Gates or Buffett, even though the latter are also quite liberal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "I feel more threatened by the billions of Adelson, Bezos, Saban, Soros, and Singer than by Gates or Buffett..."
    Bezos is not Jewish. And Gates is probably a crypto-Jew, as the late brave website judicial-inc.biz pointed out.
    , @Ethan
    Bezos isn't Jewish. I can't believe it's 2017 and I'm actually reading this anti-semitic trash. Are the people here too blinded in their hatred of Jews to even realize they are repeating the centuries-old conspiracy theory that Jews control the world. If Jews controlled the world, you think Israel would be constantly surrounded by enemies, constantly dogged in the UN? It should be noted that the majority of Jewish senators voted against the Iraq war resolution. The majority of neo-cons are non-Jews and the majority of Jews are not neo-cons. But because you can draw a link to 1 or 2 Jews here or there, all of a sudden we can lay a blanket accusation against "Jews." These views are absolutely disgusting and medieval. I can pick any political view, any single political view on Earth, and find a handful of Jews who support it (or Armenians, or Greeks, or Persian-Americans...), does that mean it's fair to lump "The Jews," into a political agenda? You people can try to intellectualize your anti-semitic trash all you want, but you're only reenacting an ancient animus.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. @Anonymous
    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI...

    This is typical obfuscation. Goyim we didn’t have power we just controlled the newspapers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Why focus so much on Jewish wealth? The main problem of the American system has a simple name: capitalism. It is wealth and excessively rich people as such, who are the problem, and with a certain amount of wealth, you stop giving a fork about your religious, ethnic, national, or other alliances. All you care about are interests rates. Rich people also have a tendency to turn psychopath and get hooked on power – after all, you need to utilize that money, and you can only buy so many yachts, ferraris and mansions, right?

    Scratch capitalism by changing the monetary system from a debt money system to a full or free money system, in which private banking based on loans and credits is called out for what it is: criminal fraud. The debt of the many – including government – is the wealth of a few. You wouldn’t have this sick connection between wealth and poverty, if money creation wasn’t based on debt, and only allowed to a (computerized and automated) fourth state power called the monetative. Read German thinkers to understand that, start with Karl Marx to understand the social and spiritual errors of capitalism, read Silvio Gesell and, more up-to-date, German economist Bernd Senf and Austrian economist Franz Hörmann to understand the possible alternatives. Educate yourself about The Wörgl Experiment to get an historical example from Austria where Free Money worked wonders before it was scrapped by the bankster elite and their political servants during the Great Depression in the 1930s.

    Only free money could guarantee free markets (and you wouldn’t even need taxes anymore). In capitalism with debt money, all you ever get is monopolies and corporate cartels.

    Add to that a real democracy – no congress, no parliarment, no parties, the legislative shall only be the people based on direct democracy. We now have the technological means to realize what has never been realized in human history: free markets, democracy, and something which could be called communism. Don’t flinch from reading this last word, the stuff you commonly refer to as communism must be called bolshevism and has had nothing to do with actual communist ideals, which can never be realized in a centralized fashion as in capitalism (centralized wealth) or in bolshevism (centralized state power). But thanks to IT at our disposal, it can now be realized in form of free money and direct democracy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    I get it.
    Communism / Socialism never produced anyone or any group with excessive powers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. ‘Stop subscribing to Jewish success model, and the Jews won’t be able to influence the Senate. Make the US Christian as Christ taught, share labour and wealth, aspire to God instead of Mammon, make the first last and the last first, love thy neighbour and the problem will be solved.’

    Would that this were possible. Great ideas in this article, but realistically, could any of it be implemented? It would take great anti-Jewish fervency, which, as you note, Americans don’t have as they have always behaved as Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    What about the American Jewish bankers–like Schiff–that bankrolled Lenin and his thugs to sneak back into Russia, then proceeded–with his Jewish buddies–to steal the Revolution from Russians that had deposed the Czar?

    Lenin’s Bolshevik Jew radicals turned that Christian nation into a Commie nightmare, murdering around 60 million Russians in the process and turned a Christian nation that had been on friendly terms with the USA into an implacable foe, eventually leading to a five decades long ‘Cold War.’

    The USSR Commies tried to export their madness to Europe, specifically Germany, which led to the popularity and rise of Hitler and eventually WW II.
    During WWII, FDR had a number of Jewish advisers, like Henry Morgenthau, Jr. whose post-WW II plan for Germany was so punitive, it gave Germans the will to fight harder in the closing days to prevent the plans implementation, thereby dragging out the war.

    It was President Truman’s support for creating Israel–by stealing it from Palestine–and his recognition of that apartheid nightmare that led to many an ill, including 9/11.

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2006/06/03/truman-and-israel/

    I like Mr. Shamir’s writings, but I think he needs to hit the history books again and refresh his memory.
    Just stay away from Wikipedia, which publishes a lop-sided version of the past.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. Nothing short of revolution can achieve this and in revolution it is important to have leading organizing force to achieve desirable results. Otherwise mob which is what unorganized people is can be easily distracted and led in direction directly opposite to their interest just like in happened for example in Ukraine and elsewhere. 1917 was probably the only case when those who led the revolution actually had common folk interests and wellbeing at heart and actually built their policy around it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. the similarities to 1930s germany are startling.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    the similarities to 1930s germany are startling
     
    Except for the intelligent and informed populace in 1930's Germany.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. MarkU says:

    If I remember correctly it was Confucius who was supposed to have said “The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name” I tire of articles such as this one, they never really get to the nub of the matter, and I sometimes wonder if the authors of such pieces are really there to create another layer of obfuscation. The best way to control the opposition is to be the opposition.

    The problem as I see it is not Jews as such but bankers. Owing to an explosive combination of fractional reserve banking and compound interest, a group of banking dynasties have become so wealthy that they have effective control of the whole western world. How rich would you be if being born fabulously wealthy to start with you were able to lend out ten, twenty or even a hundred times more than you actually owned, and collect interest on it? Ridiculously rich I would say. Rich enough to buy the politicians, the newspapers, TV channels and the film industry, rich enough to own substantial parts of the military industrial complex and most of the important land.

    True, most of the prominent banking dynasties are Jewish, having gotten a head start over the others when usury was frowned upon by most of the important religions, but Jewishness is not the problem per se.

    Imagine how difficult it would be to combat Mafia influence, if instead of saying Mafia you had to use the word Italian (or Sicilian if you have to nitpick) The financial Mafia (this is what I call them) must really love it when people use the word Jews instead of saying international bankers, it plays directly into their hands by conflating opposition to them and their schemes with antisemitism. So why do it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    Clearly Mr. Shamir got ticked off. And decided to misdirect.
    , @Lemurmaniac
    Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity.

    The reason why 'Italian' is not a synonym for 'mafia' is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal.

    While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Joe Wong says:
    @Liosnagcat
    First, abolish the Federal Reserve.

    Second, change the notion of 'representing' in Congress. It currently means 'to bring as much Federal largess as possible back to the home district'. It should be changed to mean 'to come from a given district'. Enact measures to restrict the ability of our representatives and senators to benefit personally from their legislative actions. Reducing the pool of available largess would be a good start. That would naturally result from the elimination of the income tax, which would be made possible by the elimination of the Federal Reserve (see 'First' above).

    This is simple stuff, made to seem difficult only by the propaganda of those who are benefiting from the status quo.

    Making all public elections in the USA public funded only, breaking the laws is a criminal offense with minimum 10 years inprisonment. Limit the Congressmen to two terms and their terms end at the same time. These two actions is way more simpler and effective to get rid of the special interest groups controlling the Congress and the Administration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stan d Mute

    Making all public elections in the USA public funded only, breaking the laws is a criminal offense with minimum 10 years inprisonment. Limit the Congressmen to two terms and their terms end at the same time. These two actions is way more simpler and effective to get rid of the special interest groups controlling the Congress and the Administration.
     
    But nowhere near far enough..

    The Founders had it right. Only property owners could vote, because the essence of freedom is private property. They never envisioned our insanity however and this must be corrected. Voting must be predicated on having skin in the game, but also (more importantly) predicated on NOT being a beneficiary of government transfer payments or rent-seeking. A simple test:

    If you derive more income from government than you contribute in taxes, you have NO vote. This automatically excludes those on welfare as well as ALL government employees. The abject stupidity of allowing government employees to vote for (their own) higher wages and continued growth of government boggles the mind. Similarly, government contractors such as Lockheed, Boeing, etc can easily be checked to find if they are paid more by government than they contribute in taxes. If they’re funded by government they ARE government and their employees get no vote in how REAL taxpayers’ money is spent.

    The charade that any government employee is a “taxpayer” is so obviously complete bullshit, I have to wonder that anyone could conclude otherwise. They are ALL tax-eaters and ONLY the real taxpayers should have any say in how their confiscated labor and capital are spent.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Totally agree with Shamir on the larger point, neoconservatism in the U.S. is much larger than the prominent Jews who support it. It’s a mania inspired by a country that has had extraordinary power and an exaggerated feeling of self-importance. Any group of people will exploit it.

    You get buffoons like Hillary Clinton, Rubio, Chris Christi, Jeb Bush, … all in agreement when she says, ‘we are great because we are good’, what arrogance, why not say, ‘we are great because I am good’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lemurmaniac
    Neoconservatism was founded by Jews (Leo Strauss + the ex-Trotskyites at Partisan review), and pushed by Jews into the Republican Party. The Jewish dominated media gives the public propagandists of this ideology an incredible amount of positive coverage. The lazer like focus on MENA (where the Zionists are at) and Russia (these people remember the pogroms and their later expulsion as rootless cosmopolitans by Stalin) is a clue the 'hubris' of which you has speak has a remarkable correlation with Jewish interests.

    Jews recruiting dumb goyem into their cults is nothing new. Neoconservatism, Marxism, Objectivism, Straussianism, Frankfurt School, Freudianism - get the picture? All bull**** antithetical to traditional Western conceptions of life.

    Jews network in gentile societies. They therefore have more agency than the atomized goys, who follow the leader.
    , @druid
    Yes, but these people you mentioned are bought off by the Jewish neocon Zionists!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Edgar
    It's been a week or so since I read Giraldi's piece, but I recall him saying keep Jews in the US out of policy matters relating to Israel. "Put the Jewish members in charge of Korea Policy. . . " I believe was Giraldi's example. You seem to be punching a straw man with your otherwise pedestrian argument. But thanks for supporting Giraldi's basic thesis!

    Now these pitiful William-F-Buckley-tards should put Giraldi's article back up; Shamir confirms that Giraldi is right.

    Yes, at least Shamir confirms that Giraldi is right. But, off and on, Shamir has been frivolous in recent years (even gatekeeping for “US” warmongering ZioPsychopaths) and it may be as much a curse as a blessing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Z-man says:

    “Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s?”
    Shamir

    But then he says this;

    “The Jewish prominence in the US is inbuilt in the US culture and tradition. Karl Marx wrote that “in North America, the practical domination of Judaism over the Christian world has achieved as its unambiguous and normal expression”.

    So then the Jews did cause all the wars!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. utu says:
    @MarkU
    If I remember correctly it was Confucius who was supposed to have said "The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name" I tire of articles such as this one, they never really get to the nub of the matter, and I sometimes wonder if the authors of such pieces are really there to create another layer of obfuscation. The best way to control the opposition is to be the opposition.

    The problem as I see it is not Jews as such but bankers. Owing to an explosive combination of fractional reserve banking and compound interest, a group of banking dynasties have become so wealthy that they have effective control of the whole western world. How rich would you be if being born fabulously wealthy to start with you were able to lend out ten, twenty or even a hundred times more than you actually owned, and collect interest on it? Ridiculously rich I would say. Rich enough to buy the politicians, the newspapers, TV channels and the film industry, rich enough to own substantial parts of the military industrial complex and most of the important land.

    True, most of the prominent banking dynasties are Jewish, having gotten a head start over the others when usury was frowned upon by most of the important religions, but Jewishness is not the problem per se.

    Imagine how difficult it would be to combat Mafia influence, if instead of saying Mafia you had to use the word Italian (or Sicilian if you have to nitpick) The financial Mafia (this is what I call them) must really love it when people use the word Jews instead of saying international bankers, it plays directly into their hands by conflating opposition to them and their schemes with antisemitism. So why do it?

    Clearly Mr. Shamir got ticked off. And decided to misdirect.

    Read More
    • Agree: Moi
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @MarkU
    If I remember correctly it was Confucius who was supposed to have said "The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name" I tire of articles such as this one, they never really get to the nub of the matter, and I sometimes wonder if the authors of such pieces are really there to create another layer of obfuscation. The best way to control the opposition is to be the opposition.

    The problem as I see it is not Jews as such but bankers. Owing to an explosive combination of fractional reserve banking and compound interest, a group of banking dynasties have become so wealthy that they have effective control of the whole western world. How rich would you be if being born fabulously wealthy to start with you were able to lend out ten, twenty or even a hundred times more than you actually owned, and collect interest on it? Ridiculously rich I would say. Rich enough to buy the politicians, the newspapers, TV channels and the film industry, rich enough to own substantial parts of the military industrial complex and most of the important land.

    True, most of the prominent banking dynasties are Jewish, having gotten a head start over the others when usury was frowned upon by most of the important religions, but Jewishness is not the problem per se.

    Imagine how difficult it would be to combat Mafia influence, if instead of saying Mafia you had to use the word Italian (or Sicilian if you have to nitpick) The financial Mafia (this is what I call them) must really love it when people use the word Jews instead of saying international bankers, it plays directly into their hands by conflating opposition to them and their schemes with antisemitism. So why do it?

    Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity.

    The reason why ‘Italian’ is not a synonym for ‘mafia’ is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal.

    While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkU

    "Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity"
     
    So a sweeping generalisation from a noted Nazi follower and antisemite is your counter-argument, seriously? I think it absurd to believe that Jews, or indeed any ethnic group can be held to have a 'core identity' in the way described, and then to further illustrate the point you write:-

    "The reason why ‘Italian’ is not a synonym for ‘mafia’ is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal"
     
    You are apparently implying that usury is somehow fundamental to Jewish identity, so Jew would be synonymous with usurer. One more point:-

    "While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit"
     
    It seems to be the case that all criminal enterprises have a tendency towards nepotism/ethnic nepotism (for fairly obvious reasons) It is difficult to believe that WASP banksters would be exempt.

    The question in my mind is, are you a genuine and honest antisemite or are you a banksters paid troll tasked with maintaining the conflation between international usury and Jewish ethnicity?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. @Chris Chuba
    Totally agree with Shamir on the larger point, neoconservatism in the U.S. is much larger than the prominent Jews who support it. It's a mania inspired by a country that has had extraordinary power and an exaggerated feeling of self-importance. Any group of people will exploit it.

    You get buffoons like Hillary Clinton, Rubio, Chris Christi, Jeb Bush, ... all in agreement when she says, 'we are great because we are good', what arrogance, why not say, 'we are great because I am good'.

    Neoconservatism was founded by Jews (Leo Strauss + the ex-Trotskyites at Partisan review), and pushed by Jews into the Republican Party. The Jewish dominated media gives the public propagandists of this ideology an incredible amount of positive coverage. The lazer like focus on MENA (where the Zionists are at) and Russia (these people remember the pogroms and their later expulsion as rootless cosmopolitans by Stalin) is a clue the ‘hubris’ of which you has speak has a remarkable correlation with Jewish interests.

    Jews recruiting dumb goyem into their cults is nothing new. Neoconservatism, Marxism, Objectivism, Straussianism, Frankfurt School, Freudianism – get the picture? All bull**** antithetical to traditional Western conceptions of life.

    Jews network in gentile societies. They therefore have more agency than the atomized goys, who follow the leader.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Paul Harrison
    [Choose a single Handle and stick with it, or use Anonymous/Anon. Otherwise, your comments will be trashed.]

    I have never found Jews particularly cheap or materialistic. Maybe as a Scot I have a warped perspective. Denied the chance at noble titles or churchly favor, money has been their only path to power and distinction.What I do see as a problem is the combination of extreme ability and extreme solidarity. Put that together with their adversarial relationship to the gentile world developed over the centuries and you have a recipe for harmful culture war. Producing sexy movies and violent rap, the war on Christmas, the attempt to limit free speech --- all are forms of aggression or payback for aggression, as I see it. To be sure, not all Jews or even most feel this emotion, but the ones that do work hard to promote it. According to Pew Research, 94% of self-identified Jews identify as pro-choice. The next highest group is mainline Protestants at 59%. Such a great disparity suggests to me that the issue is largely symbolic for them. I suspect you would find similar disparities on gun rights, attitudes to pornography, and religion in the public square. It's rare for Muslims or Hindus to complain about having to hear Christmas carols, but many Jews want to sick the Homeland Security SWAT Team on the school choir if a few syllables of Hark the Herald Angels are overheard. For that reason, I feel more threatened by the billions of Adelson, Bezos, Saban, Soros, and Singer than by Gates or Buffett, even though the latter are also quite liberal.

    “I feel more threatened by the billions of Adelson, Bezos, Saban, Soros, and Singer than by Gates or Buffett…”
    Bezos is not Jewish. And Gates is probably a crypto-Jew, as the late brave website judicial-inc.biz pointed out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Giuseppe says:

    He said that all Yankees are Jews, behave like Jews, aspire to be Jews and even are circumcised like Jews.

    Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    The two go hand in hand. The WASP senses of philoSemitism and anti-Irish hatred, to the point of demanding linguistic and cultural genocide - of white Gentile Christians - are two sides of the one coin.
    , @utu
    Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.

    In rationalization it might be so but rationalization is always a post factor justification. There is more to it than just hygienic reasons.
    , @Grandpa Charlie

    "Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish." -- Giuseppe (@ #33)
     
    Dr. Dean Edel, sponsored by Penn & Teller: "Circumcision: Make the informed decision featuring Dr. Dean Edell"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYyJeKtFlK4
    , @edNels
    Well don't forget all the rest of continental Europe and Russia. Who's idea was it to start cutting babies' dicks? Ritual, not so just ritual excuse me! it is Castration light.

    Takes off a huge amount of the natural feeling a man might need in certain circumstances, like, not to be course, but after momma has delivered twins say, there is a time when sex commences again, and she isn't tight like before, how about some f'n sensitivity about that then!?

    Who gains from it? Not only is it bad, but it says… loud and clear: ''Who's your papa?''
    like Teli used to say. You know there's a presence of something evil there that came up with that idea.

    It is a primordial curse, upon seeing daylight the first time, he is abused to the max, and remembers it for life. Wake up Eloi.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Joe Hide says:

    To Israel Shamir,
    Very interesting reading as usual. Please do more.
    I would add that a much more implementable process of improving all human existence would be the development of inexpensive and convenient cell phone aps to screen for psychopath, sociopathic, narcissistic, murderous, etc tendencies. This information should NOT be protected under privacy laws (Just like the identities of sexual predators is not). That way we all can somewhat protect ourselves from these semi-human evolutionary throw-backs. We also can this end their political careers. The technology is certainly there, and a non-technological early identifier would be seeing those with these traits strongly opposing this technological development.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. The split between Putin’s American supporters and the Jews couldn’t be more obvious or more complete. The Jewish neocons mentioned above all believe in US global hegemony but for them it’s a means to an end. For them, the point of US hegemony is to prop up Israel. They share the view of other hegemonists, including Putin’s American supporters, that the EU is a threat to US hegemony and must be destroyed but give priority to getting rid of Putin over the “war on the EU”. Putin has challenged Israel’s American protector and the instrument for delivering that protection: NATO. He has made matters worse by challenging Israel’s regional hegemony in the Middle East: propping up Assad, threatening to shoot down Israeli planes and snuggling up to Iran. Putin is a bigger threat to Israel then the EU, so it’s Putin now, the EU later. The other hegemonists, including Putin’s American supporters, see US global hegemony as an end in itself. Hubris. The indispensable nation shall not have strange gods before it! They see the EU as a threat and destroying that threat takes priority over everything else. Putin is just a means to that end. Once the EU is destroyed, they’ll probably turn on Putin but, for the moment, he’s a useful idiot in the fight to maintain US global hegemony. Israel itself, indeed, is just a means to the same end: a useful pretext for maintaining hegemony. Thus, the Jewish neocons won’t sacrifice Israel just so as to destroy the EU and Putin’s American supporters won’t sacrifice him just to prop up Israel. The next logical step is therefore for Putin’s supporters to try to install a Putin stooge in Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    The abuse has been going on for a long time.

    A Jewish Defector Warns America: Benjamin Freedman Speaks on Zionism
    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. The Zionists have controlled America completely since 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the IRS both of which were sponsored by the Zionist bankers to enable the U.S. to be forced into wars which we taxpayers would be forced into debt and made slaves of the Zionist banking cartel.

    We are not a free country, we are slaves on the Zionist plantation aka Israels colony, and that is the reason we are in perpetual wars for the profit of the Zionists banking cartel, and that is the fact of the matter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    It's just a coincidence, no doubt, that the last THREE Federal Reserve Chairs have been Jews.
    , @Zumbuddi
    Very true.
    The Israel Firster meme must be rejected as inaccurate.
    Zionist Jews overthrew USA in 3 or 4 main stages
    1. 1913 Fed Reserve
    2. Creation of American Jewish Congress in Independence Hall Phil's for specific purpose of influencing Versailles Treaty in order to establish Jewish Palestine & guarantee empowerment of Jews in Europe
    3 AJC became permanent institution, elected FDR, populated FOR admin, partnered with East coast Anglicans to support Stalin &Churchill in project of destroying Germany
    4 ABC operatives & allied institutions --- like VIA --- took over Germany etc
    5 Israel up & running, Zionists eager to complete cleansing operation & expand & control the entire region. 1979 Bibi & Benzion Netanyahu blueprint for Global War on Terror. COALITION represented is si.ilar to WWII COALITION --- Trotskyites, East coast Anglophiles i.e. George H W Bush.

    GWOT may be morphing to a 6th phase in the Jewish overthrow/occupation of USA --- Iraq, first big mission of GWOT --was "fight them there so we don't have to fight them here." The new phase, w/ Charlottesville as marker, brings the war to The 'Homeland and destruction of American symbols & Founders
    Notice how ABC created in Independence Hall; GWOT conference on July 4; current phase started in Jefferson s own city & university
    , @Paul C.
    Well said. It makes you wonder about all the economics professors across the country. They haven't figured it out? Amazing. How is it possible that ALL countries are bankrupt and in debt? They've all relinquished the right to manage their own money supply to a private banking cabal of zionist (luciferian) bankers (i.e. the Fed, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, etc...). The world is effectively enslaved. Our birth certificate is a bond, pledging us as human collateral for the US debt.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hfk2bAMiQZU&t=5341s

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Marlowe says:
    @Anonymous
    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI...

    It was 1916 when the US entered WW1. The jews pushed them in via the banks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. hyperbola says:
    @Anonymous
    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI...

    Well 1913 was an important milestone, but started much earlier.

    An Essay On The History Of Banking
    A Historical Perspective: The Banking Monopoly

    https://criminalbankingmonopoly.wordpress.com/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Jake says:

    “The Jewish prominence in the US is inbuilt in the US culture and tradition. Karl Marx wrote that “in North America, the practical domination of Judaism over the Christian world has achieved as its unambiguous and normal expression”. He said that all Yankees are Jews, behave like Jews, aspire to be Jews and even are circumcised like Jews. So it is natural that real Jews succeed better in being Jews than their Gentile neighbours. Werner Sombart added that Jews were prominent from the very dawn of America and they created American-style capitalism the way that fits them. The Jews are prominent now because America is custom-built for Jews to fit and suit them, he said.”

    Yes, indeedy do. Shamir has nailed it.

    Why? Because WASP culture was born from a Judaizing heresy – Anglo-Saxon Puritanism. No less than Oliver Cromwell – adored by unfashionable conservatives such as John Derbyshire and Peter Brimelow as much as he is by Mainstream American ‘conservatives’ – cemented the deal by inviting Jews back into England and taking their loans. Cromwell gave Jews more rights and privileges than the vast majority of British Isles Christians had.

    And that sums the matter: WASP Elites always have allied, and always will ally, with Jews against the vast majority of white Gentiles.

    You cannot separate the ‘Jewish problem’ from the ‘WASP problem.’ You cannot solve the ‘Jewish problem’ with WASP culture in charge. WASP culture is at its heart strongly philoSemitic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. All Jews exhibit some form of cultivated Holocaust hysteria.

    The practical result is that most Jewish people support a political scheme called diversity and inclusion, a scheme that promotes central government entitlements for victim class people.

    Victim class people are people who claim to be victimized by Nazism or white Christians.

    The nation-state of Israel is based entirely on a diversity and inclusion scheme specifically benefitting Jews.

    Zionist and neocon sedition in the US is integral to the diversity and inclusion scheme.

    US support for Zionism is also support for American-Israeli fascism around the world.

    The solution in the US to American-Israeli fascism is to end the diversity and inclusion scheme in the US.

    [MORE]

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    Feminist are entitled by law because of presumed Male oppression
    Jewish are entitled by law because of presumed Gentile oppression
    Sodomites are entitled by law because of presumed Straight oppression
    Elective Abortionist are entitled by law because of presumed Innocent Life Advocate oppression
    Muslims are entitled by law because of presumed Christian oppression
    Disabled are entitled by law because of presumed Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are entitled by law because of presumed White oppression
    Latinos are entitled by law because of presumed Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are entitled by law because of presumed Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are entitled by law because of presumed Militia oppression
    Native Americans are entitled by law because of presumed Paleface oppression
    Asians are entitled by law because of presumed Occidental oppression
    International Socialist are entitled by law because of presumed Local Government oppression
    Social Justice Crony Capitalist are entitled by law because of presumed Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist-Neocons are entitled by law because of presumed Anti-Fascist oppression

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. Jake says:
    @Giuseppe

    He said that all Yankees are Jews, behave like Jews, aspire to be Jews and even are circumcised like Jews.
     
    Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.

    The two go hand in hand. The WASP senses of philoSemitism and anti-Irish hatred, to the point of demanding linguistic and cultural genocide – of white Gentile Christians – are two sides of the one coin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Jews allied with WASP philo semites to draft Irishmen & blacks & other Americans to marginalize the large German-American population, and go to Europe to kill the ancestors & brothers of the European Americans -- especially German, but also French & Italian, who had invested most in creation & building up of America.
    Notice that Ireland remained neutral, and that today, so many of US military leaders are Irish.

    Notice also that once they'd had their use of WASPs, Jews turned on them and worked to wipe them out: Phil Weiss has written of how, as a youngster, his Jewish community thought of nothing more than destroying/displacing/replacing WASPs.

    , @Giuseppe
    I disagree, but either way it's a matter of cutting off your schmoes to spite your race.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Hupa says:

    American wars are driven by the american need of democratizing the world and by seeing itself as the End of History

    USA is a completed state, while others need to be completed, so that we can freeze history, but that won’t happen until everybody becomes democratic and egalitarian like America

    In 1918 the Austro-Hungarian Empire tried to negotiate peace with the USA, but that was rejected by an envoy of Woodrow Wilson, because A-H was an old aristocratic monarchy! And we should destroy monarchies, so that we can bring in democracy and egalitarianism! The League of Nations had its HQ in Geneva, because Switzerland was one of the first democracies in Europe

    Don’t blame the Jews that they are taking advantage of your cultural tendencies. The need to fight wars for “democracy” is YOUR OWN invention, not jewish or anybody else’s. Jews have simply become americanized, that’s all

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  43. hyperbola says:
    @Edgar
    It's been a week or so since I read Giraldi's piece, but I recall him saying keep Jews in the US out of policy matters relating to Israel. "Put the Jewish members in charge of Korea Policy. . . " I believe was Giraldi's example. You seem to be punching a straw man with your otherwise pedestrian argument. But thanks for supporting Giraldi's basic thesis!

    Now these pitiful William-F-Buckley-tards should put Giraldi's article back up; Shamir confirms that Giraldi is right.

    “””It’s been a week or so since I read Giraldi’s piece, but I recall him saying keep Jews in the US out of policy matters relating to Israel. “Put the Jewish members in charge of Korea Policy. . . ” “”””

    Actually we already tried that during the Reagan administration. At the time letting the ZionCons loose in Central America produced the first several million refugees in the US.

    How Neocons Destabilized Europe – Consortiumnews

    https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/07/how-neocons-destabilized-europe/

    ….. When I first encountered the neocons in the 1980s, they had been given Central America to play with. President Ronald Reagan had credentialed many of them, bringing into the U.S. government neocon luminaries such as Elliott Abrams and Robert Kagan. But Reagan mostly kept them out of the big-power realms: the Mideast and Europe.

    Those strategic areas went to the “adults,” people like James Baker, George Shultz, Philip Habib and Brent Scowcroft. The poor Central Americans, as they tried to shed generations of repression and backwardness imposed by brutal right-wing oligarchies, faced U.S. neocon ideologues who unleashed death squads and even genocide against peasants, students and workers.

    The result not surprisingly was a flood of refugees, especially from El Salvador and Guatemala, northward to the United States. The neocon “success” in the 1980s, crushing progressive social movements and reinforcing the oligarchic controls, left most countries of Central America in the grip of corrupt regimes and crime syndicates, periodically driving more waves of what Reagan called “feet people” through Mexico to the southern U.S. border…
    _________________________________________________________________

    [MORE]

    AND, we still suffer the damage from EVER letting ZionCons be involved in US foreign policy. These are (religious) crime sects/mafias that should be cleaned out of both our government and media.

    London Editor Proposes British Honduras Be Turned into Jewish State

    http://www.jta.org/1939/01/08/archive/london-editor-proposes-british-honduras-be-turned-into-jewish-state

    A suggestion that British Honduras be transformed into a Jewish State under the joint protection of Great Britain and the United States was made today by W.E. Simnett, editor of the Crown Colonist,….

    The Jewish families that run Honduras

    https://dagobertobellucci.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/the-jewish-families-that-run-honduras/

    THE ISRAELI CONNECTION TO THE HONDURAN COUP

    https://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/the-israeli-connection-to-the-honduran-coup/

    No es casual la presencia del MOSSAD en Honduras

    http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=93190

    Hillary Lost My Vote in Honduras

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/02/hillary-lost-my-vote-in-honduras/

    Hillary Clinton is lying about the criminal U.S.-backed coup in Honduras.

    http://www.salon.com/2016/04/15/hillary_clinton_is_lying_about_the_criminal_u_s_backed_coup_in_honduras_it_should_be_as_scandalous_as_libya/

    Before Her Murder, Berta Cáceres Singled Out Hillary Clinton for Criticism
    The presidential candidate has ignored criticism of her role in enabling the consolidation of the Honduran coup.

    http://www.thenation.com/article/chronicle-of-a-honduran-assassination-foretold/

    Honduras and Israel: A New Special Relationship
    Just as it serviced murderous regimes in Central America in the 1980s, Israel will now be exporting forms of repression to Honduras’ abusive government.

    https://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/Honduras-and-Israel-A-New-Special-Relationship-20160825-0008.html#comsup

    And, of course, the sect is now fully into exploiting the success of their coup in Honduras.
    Archaeology, Biology, Appropriation, and Empire in Honduras

    http://www.unz.com/plee/archaeology-biology-appropriation-and-empire-in-honduras/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. How about a remedy for social and financial instability?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  45. I’m really surprised you haven’t taken the no-no Giraldi article down.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. hyperbola says:
    @Priss Factor
    While agreeing with Giraldi on the malady, let us discuss the remedy. Would keeping Jews out of foreign policy making actually help? Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s? The Jews weren’t specially prominent before that time, and certainly weren’t overrepresented in the establishment.

    This is an interesting question, but there is a difference between Then and Now.

    In the past, US expansionism was part of the global norm. Imperialism was common and accepted all over the world. Ottomans ruled over a giant empire. Russians kept expanding into Siberia and Central Asia. It also swallowed parts of Central Europe. Manchus took over China and gobbled up more territory as part of Chinese empire. There were native imperialist wars in Africa before white man came. And Mexico was also the product of empire building. Spanish took it from Aztec Imperialists, and the Conquis took more land. And Spanish also took Philippines. Brits and French were creating vast empires. US was created out of empire-building and continued as such.

    So, US warmongering in the past was part of the world norm. Everyone did it. Also, empire-building was seen as glorious for the Whole People. So, even though the elites benefited the most, there was a sense of shared glory among all Britons over the British Empire. All Frenchmen were to share the glory of the French Empire. And US expansion into SW territories was great not only for elites but for Anglo settlers who built new lives in those areas. And it was even good for Mexers in the region because Anglos did so much than Mexers had done before when SW territories had belonged to Mexico. It's like Ramon has it pretty good working for gringos. He was like the Guillermo of his day.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEA-o4IJAic

    So, imperial wars were once part of the norm, and all peoples took part in it. Even small powers did. If not for French Imperialism, the mini-imperialism of the Thais and Viets would have wiped Cambodia off the map. And of course, American Indians had been like childish savages 'genociding' one another before the white man came.

    The glory belonged to ALL the people. It was not just an elite thing. So, when Brits took over India, even British masses could go to India and enjoy the glory of calling a person-of-dot a 'brown sammy'. So, there was shared glory for all people as fellow rulers of the empire. The elites got to lord over the empire, and the white masses got to enjoy privileges too, like calling a person-of-dot a 'bloody coon'.

    https://youtu.be/S8mfOyCySKg?t=39s

    And when Anglo Empire spread across the 'fruited plains'(now the fruity plains), little people gained along with the big people. Sure, the big industrialists got more, but little folks got their little house on the prairie too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt4z16n-3eU

    But then, with the spread of nationalism all around the world and the rise of native elites who felt slighted by European imperialists with their exclusive all-white clubs, there was an anti-imperialist uprising that finally exploded in the 20th century and achieved its goals after WWII when European imperialist nations were on the ropes and bankrupt.

    Still, before imperialism came to be a bad idea, it had been part of the world norm among all peoples... even though Europeans extended it farther than any previous civilization. So, warmongering back then was different from warmongering in the post WWII era. During the Cold War, there was nothing worse than imperialism in the eyes of the world community, at least ideally. This was rather ironic since both US and USSR were great empires or neo-empires that used quasi-imperialist modes in the name of combating imperialism, be it communist or capitalist.

    Cold War was a strange phenom because it exerted great imperialist energies against the threat of the Other imperialism. Pax Americana portrayed itself as representing the 'Free World' against Soviet-Communist Imperialist aggression that held Eastern Europe captive and funded fanatics in Asia, Africa, and Latin America to spread the Marxist virus. In Afghanistan, US purported to back the 'freedom fighters' against Soviet Imperialist occupation.

    Soviets did the same thing against the US. Soviets argued capitalism can only be imperialist. So, US support of right-wing autocrats all over the world was part of the American Imperialist world order. Pax Sovietica promised justice and equality for all peoples under the liberating cause of communism or related ideologies.

    And even though some today say the Cold War was exaggerated and overblown, it was a real conflict between giants. Both great powers did horrible things to win the war or to contain the enemy and to bribe its allies(or puppets). So, the warmongering during that period has to be seen as part of a worldwide struggle. A real struggle of History, as Fukuyama would say.

    So, even though US warmongering and aggression in the past(when Jews did not control America) had their dark side, they were part of the world norm OR part of a great Historical struggle between ideologies, the two that triumphed in WWII with the demise of German, French, British, and Japanese empires.

    But, things are different today. US is the lone superpower and stronger than ever. And yet, all this might is being used to serve the interests of the 2% of the population. Actually, closer to 0.2% of the population, the Jewish globalist elites as most American Jews may not be crazy about all this saber-rattling and grow increasingly critical of Israel's reckless policies.

    Whatever one may say of past imperialism, it served the entire people. When US took SW areas from Mexico, it was for ALL Americans to share in the booty and free tacos. But when US makes a mess of Middle East and North Africa(nations hated by Israel), what do most Americans get from it? Nothing.
    Also, if warmongering during the Cold War had some overarching purpose in the Grand Struggle of ideologies and powers, the new wars are totally petty and narrowly tribal in design. Sure, some neocons try to portray it as a new Grand Struggle. World War IV as Podhoretz called it.

    https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/world-war-iv-how-it-started-what-it-means-and-why-we-have-to-win/

    9/11 was bad stuff, but US was at war with a bunch of ragtag terrorists. How is that WWIV? And what did Iraq have to do with it? If anything, Hussein(vile nasty bugger that he was) ruthlessly clamped down on terrorists. And how could the world have so many 'new hitlers'? Lately, Putin became 'new hitler' ever since he said NO to Poo-Ride parades and 'gay marriage' in Russia. Most perversely, the War on Terror soon morphed into War with Terror. Under Obama, the US was actually working with remnants of Alqaeda(rebranded as 'moderate rebels') to undermine secular modern regimes that kept order and stability in the region. It is incredible that Americans aren't outraged that the war that began against the terrorists who did 9/11 eventually metastasized into war with terrorists against the only secular regimes in the region. (But then, even 9/11 was mostly blowback for US policy in the Middle East. Iran and Iraq had NOTHING to do with it. It was US and Saudis that had funded and created Jihadi forces, esp in Afghanistan, to use against the Soviets and then Iran. US was attacked by the very monster it created with the help of Saudis. Indeed, it is telling that after 9/11, the US did nothing against the very nation, Saudi Arabia, that had been most instrumental in working with US to create monsters like Osama and others. But since Saudis are allies of the US, the Jewish media moguls and deep state overlooked that key detail and spun wild crazy theories about how Iraq and Iran must be destroyed to stop terrorism. What a sick world.)

    All of this was hype. Speak pushily and carry a big Shtick. Cold War may have been exaggerated but it was real enough. Soviets were a great power and did rule over Eastern Europe. And if China had kept good relations with Russia and Mao had more economic sense, the Sino-Soviet alliance might have kept the Cold War going for much longer. Imagine if, with some economic reforms, Chinese labor had combined with Soviet resources and knowhow. Communist power would have been much more formidable. But Mao had a peasant mentality and didn't get modernity.

    Anyway, the nature of today's wars are far more perverse because the world norm has been anti-imperialist since the end of WWII. So, why is US acting like an imperialist power in a world that has no place for imperialism? US freaks out about Russia 'invading' Crimea(when it wasn't invaded) but it feels it has the right to make threats to other nations and wreck Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and maybe Iran and Venezuela too? The fact that most of these victims of US happen to be nations esp hated by Jewish globalists is proof enough that Jewish tribal hostility is at the center of it.

    During the Cold War, many people on both sides knew there were abuses. Surely, there were people in Soviet Union who felt bad about Russian domination over Hungary in 56 and Czechoslovakia in 68. And there were Americans who were sickened by US meddling in Latin America and Asia. But they were seen as maybe necessary because of the domino theory. Soviets felt that if they let one nation go, all others might follow. US felt that if it lost Vietnam, others might follow.

    But we now live in a world that could be peaceful. The world no longer believes in empire. There is no great ideological struggle. Some call West vs Islam a 'clash of civilizations', but it could easily be solved by ending mass immigration or colonization and also be end of US meddling in the Middle East. Leave those people alone. It is Jewish-Israeli paranoia about Iran and Syria and all the rest that led to these useless wars that serve NO ONE but Israel and Jewish globalist-Zionist interests.

    Fukuyama is a real globalist shi*, but he was right in the sense that there is no longer any great ideological struggle. There are Big Ideas but they are hyped and bloated, like homomania or queertianity, which is Jewish proxy of ersatz-christianity.

    If the world just wanted to get along and do business, we could do that and have peace and stability, the kind hoped for by Steven Pinker in BETTER DEVILS OF OUR NATURE.

    Japan doesn't want to fight wars. European nations don't want to conquer nations overseas. Russia wants trade, not more wars. It doesn't even want to take back Lithuania and Estonia. It is even reluctant to take Donbass. China just wants more economic ties. Chinese don't want to have military bases all over nor does it want to export Chinese-ness as world standard. Chinese don't think 'inside every barbarian is a chinaman trying to get out'. Latin America shelved the old struggles. There was a time when every Latin American nation had a serious Marxist insurgency. That is all gone.

    So, what is driving all this madness that is making 21st century into a hellhole?

    1. It is Jewish globalist greed in foreign policy. The desire to use US power to further Jewish Might, esp in the Middle East. As Jews control the US and EU(as vassals of US), they have the two richest parts of the world. But Jews also want to take control of vast Russia with all its resources. The only thing stopping such ambition is Russian nationalism, and this is why Jews seek to undermine it with appeals to 'democracy' and homomania. One problem with this is the goals are too narrow. Jews simply don't identify with most gentiles who make up nations like US or Russia. When Anglos ruled, sure the elites took most for themselves. But they still felt something for the masses. Putin feels something for fellow Russians. Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt felt something for the white masses. Even though they were elites, they were of the same stock as the masses. But Jews don't feel any affinity with the goyim. Sure, Jews will make temporary alliances. So, Jews will unite with Christians against Muslims and then later unite with Muslims against Christians or do both at the same time... like today. Jews will make white Christians hate 'muzzies' and drop bombs in the Middle East.. and then hug Muslim 'refugees' and pretend to protect them from 'racist white Christians'. Jewish contempt for goyim is too deep. Not all Jews feel this way, but many powerful Jews do have this animus. Chinese elites are lowdown and dirty, a bunch of snakes, BUT they feel some sense of solidarity with other Chinese as fellow countrymen. But Jews don't feel any such for the white masses, the 'deplorables' who are hurting. They pretend to care for blacks, but then go about welcoming immigration-colonization to replace urban blacks with Asians, Hindus, Arabs, and Mesos.

    In a way, Jews feel it is to their benefit for the world to be in a state of flux and crisis. After all, if all nations were stable and at peace, they would look to their own domestic affairs. And then, each nation will ask itself, "who has the most power and privilege in our nation?", and the finger might point to Jews. So, in order for nations around the world to not notice Jewish power, they must be made to feel hostility against one another. So, if Americans are angry with Russians, they won't notice who really rules America. That way, Jews can play the role of 'patriots' defending US from Russian 'aggression' and 'influence'. And if Americans are made to hate Iran(as an 'existential threat'), then they won't ask questions about who really rules US foreign policy and why. And why not push some Yellow Peril so that Americans will think China is behind everything... even as Jews played a huge role in bringing China into the globalist economic system. Do business with China but use media power to make China out to be the Princess Dragon Mom.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FILogARZdxc

    If you're a coyote, it's better to have bears, tigers, lions, buffaloes, and etc hate and fight one another. That way, they might not notice you. It's like what the woman does in RASHOMON. She makes her husband and the bandit fight one another while she runs away. It's like YOJIMBO where the ronin makes one clan fight the other clan while sitting pretty in between.

    2. But there is even a bigger threat that will mess up all nations in the 21st century. It is mass migration and demographic imperialism. No group has been more responsible in pushing this than the Jews. This will spell doom and end for Europe and possibly for East Asia and Australia/New Zealand as well. And Canada and US. Europe is esp in trouble as it's being flooded with black Africans who are more muscled, more aggressive, more loutish, and bigger-donged than white men. As Europe is Africanized, white men will be wussified and white women will be womb-colonized into creating vile creatures like Obama and Kaepernick. Europe will become like Morocco or worse.
    With control of Media, Academia, and the Sacred Narrative, Jews have persuaded all these naive native whites into embracing Diversity, Jungle Fever, Replacism, and 'White Guilt and Atonement' as the only way forward. And US is no different.

    For a time following WWII, there was the golden age of universal nationalism when all peoples aspire to be independent and have national independence. At the UN, it was agreed that imperialism is wrong in any part of the world. So, the end of the Cold War seemed to promise the end of imperialism. Indeed, even the first Gulf War was billed as anti-imperialist as Iraq invaded Kuwait. But this act of anti-imperialism and limited war soon turned into prelude for More Wars of even greater imperialist designs. I mean Hussein was small potatoes in grabbing only Kuwait. US will grab entire big nations, at least if Jewish globalists want them occupied or destroyed.

    Anyway, the golden age of nationalism could have been realized to its fullness with the end of the Cold War. The Cold War necessitated both US and USSR to act like imperialist powers in the grand struggle. But with no more such struggle, each people could finally be independent. Indeed, the liberation of each Eastern European nation was seen as the new promise of nationalism. Iron Curtain was no more. Also, the Soviet Union itself birthed many new nations. Russian empire finally came to an end. And it was mostly done peacefully. There was war in Yugoslavia, but at the end of the day, peace was achieved with rise of new nations.
    And it could have been a happy story. And most peoples would have been content with this triumph of Universal Nationalism.

    So, what destroyed it? One was US-warmongering in Middle East and North Africa that led to huge 'refugee' crisis. Another was rise of PC in EU that somehow made 'diversity' sacrosanct. So, it was the duty of white nations to keep allowing in tons of non-whites on some crazy notion that more diversity is good. (If so, why is Latin America and North Africa such a mess?)

    But even more dangerous was the alliance between Jewish globalists and non-white elites & masses all over the world. Non-whites who had once resisted and fought Western Imperialists and told whites to GO HOME now decided to shift into Demographic Imperialist Mode and invade white nations. The reason was crass and obvious. They made a mess of things in their own nations with corruption, violence, and barbarism. And they wanted short-cut to material comfort and social stability in the West. So, these non-whites went from 'whites go home' to 'whites, you better let me in'. And it was Jewish Power that pulled the strings to pressure white nations to take in these POC.
    POC found PC very useful as a moral cover for their crassness. In reality, they failed their own nations and want to flee from their own people and culture to enjoy better material lives in white-made nations. But that would sound crass and shameful. It would mean they would rather run to white success than fix their own failures. So, PC is so useful because it justifies non-white invasion of white nations in moral terms: redress or reparations for white 'exploitation' in the past. Just a lot of crock. POC and PC has led to a strange phenom of "whitey, I hate you, so please let me come live with you".

    So, universal nationalism was destroyed by this new virulent form of globalism. If the West had not allowed mass immigration, non-whites would have worked hard to make their own nations better. But once the gates were open, non-whites figured it would be much easier and faster to have a good life by just moving to the West. Also, it was a great disaster in allowing non-white elites into white elite institutions. When white elites used to send signals like 'no dogs and chinese allowed', non-whites felt slighted and angry and decided to lead their own people in national struggles. But now that Western elite institutions let in non-white elites, the latter would rather join the Elysium club and collaborate with globalist Jews/whites than work for their own kind. This had led to Diversity of Privilege where elites of all color rub shoulders in hogging power, privilege, and influence. In contrast, masses get Diversity of Poverty. While white elites rub shoulders with fancy mulattoes and sophisticated people-of-dot, white masses get punched by nasty thug Negroes and must smell hindu fart in elevators.

    So, they effectively became demographic imperialism, and so, we are moved back into the Age of Empire. Indeed, it is much worse than past imperialism. Back then, whites, the most advanced peoples, went to less developed places and spread science and technology. Also, except for the New World(and Australia), whites didn't have the numbers to replace the natives. So, Africa is still black, South Asia is still brown, and East Asia is still yellow.
    But the current demographic tide into the West will turn white nations into mulatto nations. France will become Morocco-Cameroon. Germany will become Nigeria-Turkey. Sweden will become Somalia-Afghanistan. Why would Jews do something so terrible? After all, Jews are adamant about keeping Israel Jewish and they don't take in any Africans or new Muslims. Jews do this to white nations because they ONLY care about their own power. Jews figure that if all white nations are made 'diverse', there won't be sufficient white solidarity to work against Jews. Also, whites will be too busy bickering with Africans and Muslims to deal with Jews. Also, Jews will work both sides. Jews will go to the non-whites and say, "we are your allies against nazi 'racist' whites" and Jews will go to whites and plead, "Oh help us poor poor Jews from those terrorist antisemitic Muzzies who are like the new nazis."

    As the result of current trends, the 21st century will be even more crucial than the 20th century. It will determine if the West and white race survive at all.

    Perhaps you should make an alliance with others that have been equally abused by the jews? In fact, even by the very same jews. Might be more effective than allowing yourself to be “divided and conquered”?

    Controller Houses Of The East India Company: EIC Series Part IV

    http://greatgameindia.com/controller-houses-east-india-company-eic-series-part-iv/

    East India Company’s trade was divided into many parts and a particular family owned each part. They were given full control over a nation under consideration. They developed local industrial/business house, through which they exploited the independent nations. So for people of any nation, it is the local industrial house that comes to light as the exploiter and not EICs. Even today these Houses control most
    of the MNCs we see and follow the same Ideology & Methodology as the EICs.

    In the previous parts of this ongoing East India Company Series we examined the origin of these EICs, their motives and the motives of Multi National Corporations (MNCs). We also examined the commodities EICs dealt with and MNCs plan to deal with or are already dealing with along with the unique philosophical outlook that determined their ideology and methodology and gave them the opportunity to trade in goods like narcotics, which can destroy human civilization.

    With this background we now study the EICs and MNCs operatives or controller families. EIC trade as mentioned earlier was divided into many parts and a particular family owned a particular part. For example, the growing of opium and collecting taxes in India was owned by EIC and its paid officials or after 1837 by the British government itself. But the House of Sassoon’s handled the trading in opium and other goods in India. Thereafter, the House of Jardine and Matheson handled their distribution in China and the House of Inchapes handled the shipping of these goods. House of Openheimers/Rhodes handled the gold and diamond mining business. The American operations were handled by the House of Rockefellers, Seagrams, Sassoons, Japhets, Jardine – Mathesons etc. The Houses of Rothschilds and Warburgs coordinated the banking aspect of this trade. Apart from theses, Houses of Lloyds, Abes and Astors assisted these operations by insuring the business of EICs. Even today these houses control most of the MNCS we see. We do an in-depth study of Rothschilds and Rockefellers and at the end give a list of Indian MNCs, only to show how most of these belong to only one single group run by a single family which was associated with the EIC owners, by either business or marriage…….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Wally says: • Website
    @Serg Derbst
    Why focus so much on Jewish wealth? The main problem of the American system has a simple name: capitalism. It is wealth and excessively rich people as such, who are the problem, and with a certain amount of wealth, you stop giving a fork about your religious, ethnic, national, or other alliances. All you care about are interests rates. Rich people also have a tendency to turn psychopath and get hooked on power - after all, you need to utilize that money, and you can only buy so many yachts, ferraris and mansions, right?

    Scratch capitalism by changing the monetary system from a debt money system to a full or free money system, in which private banking based on loans and credits is called out for what it is: criminal fraud. The debt of the many - including government - is the wealth of a few. You wouldn't have this sick connection between wealth and poverty, if money creation wasn't based on debt, and only allowed to a (computerized and automated) fourth state power called the monetative. Read German thinkers to understand that, start with Karl Marx to understand the social and spiritual errors of capitalism, read Silvio Gesell and, more up-to-date, German economist Bernd Senf and Austrian economist Franz Hörmann to understand the possible alternatives. Educate yourself about The Wörgl Experiment to get an historical example from Austria where Free Money worked wonders before it was scrapped by the bankster elite and their political servants during the Great Depression in the 1930s.

    Only free money could guarantee free markets (and you wouldn't even need taxes anymore). In capitalism with debt money, all you ever get is monopolies and corporate cartels.

    Add to that a real democracy - no congress, no parliarment, no parties, the legislative shall only be the people based on direct democracy. We now have the technological means to realize what has never been realized in human history: free markets, democracy, and something which could be called communism. Don't flinch from reading this last word, the stuff you commonly refer to as communism must be called bolshevism and has had nothing to do with actual communist ideals, which can never be realized in a centralized fashion as in capitalism (centralized wealth) or in bolshevism (centralized state power). But thanks to IT at our disposal, it can now be realized in form of free money and direct democracy.

    I get it.
    Communism / Socialism never produced anyone or any group with excessive powers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. AaronB says:

    Great article, Shamir.

    And the Jews themselves merely represent a principle older than them, and that will outlast them. Power.

    Any group that focus on power, will be “Jewish”, just as the Romans were Jewish, the Athenian were Jewish, the English were Jewish.

    We are not fighting against flesh and blood, but against a Spirit. Jews merely manifest this spirit in our times.

    Rid of the world of flesh and blood Jews, and the Spirit will find another incarnation in a new people.

    For centuries, this Spirit manifested in the most Christian nations of Western Europe, despite Christianity being opposed to power.

    A creed, a theology, a religion is helpless against this Spirit – a person animated by this Spirit can turn any creed into its opposite, without shame.

    Focusing on “forms”, external husks, at the expense of the Spirit does not work – Christianity had the “form” of a power-denying creed, but gradually it’s Spirit came to mean the opposite of what it’s words plainly say, as it still does for many on the alt-right today.

    Jews are the external husks of an animating Spirit – focusing on Jews will solve nothing, as our fight is against powers and principalities and not flesh and blood.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Do you mean that "Spirit" literally, or just an expression, describing one of fundamental elements of human nature?
    , @jacques sheete

    Focusing on “forms”, external husks, at the expense of the Spirit does not work – Christianity had the “form” of a power-denying creed, but gradually it’s Spirit came to mean the opposite of what it’s words plainly say...
     
    Agree.

    For that reason, there is no cure, or at least there is no cure that any man can understand or even begin to implement.

    As for the "Jews", they could do very little without plenty of goyim willing to play their game. Everyone should let that sink in for a moment. Rather than changing them, we may need to think about changing ourselves, but that's not likely any time soon, if history is any guide.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Wally says: • Website
    @DESERT FOX
    The Zionists have controlled America completely since 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the IRS both of which were sponsored by the Zionist bankers to enable the U.S. to be forced into wars which we taxpayers would be forced into debt and made slaves of the Zionist banking cartel.

    We are not a free country, we are slaves on the Zionist plantation aka Israels colony, and that is the reason we are in perpetual wars for the profit of the Zionists banking cartel, and that is the fact of the matter.

    It’s just a coincidence, no doubt, that the last THREE Federal Reserve Chairs have been Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DESERT FOX
    Well, they are dual citizens of Israel as are all the leading Zionists and they should be made to make a choice either they are Israelis or they are Americans, and the obvious answer is they are Zionist Israelis.

    The FED is a privately owned zionist banking cartel that creates money out of thin air and then loans it to the government at interest , a real scam , and of course we ie our government should print the money ourselves and then we would be free of the zionists , but no one has the guts to do it after they saw what the zionists did to JFK and RFK and JFKjr.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. MarkU says:
    @Lemurmaniac
    Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity.

    The reason why 'Italian' is not a synonym for 'mafia' is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal.

    While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit.

    “Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity”

    So a sweeping generalisation from a noted Nazi follower and antisemite is your counter-argument, seriously? I think it absurd to believe that Jews, or indeed any ethnic group can be held to have a ‘core identity’ in the way described, and then to further illustrate the point you write:-

    “The reason why ‘Italian’ is not a synonym for ‘mafia’ is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal”

    You are apparently implying that usury is somehow fundamental to Jewish identity, so Jew would be synonymous with usurer. One more point:-

    “While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit”

    It seems to be the case that all criminal enterprises have a tendency towards nepotism/ethnic nepotism (for fairly obvious reasons) It is difficult to believe that WASP banksters would be exempt.

    The question in my mind is, are you a genuine and honest antisemite or are you a banksters paid troll tasked with maintaining the conflation between international usury and Jewish ethnicity?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lemurmaniac
    So anti-semitism is discredited by being anti-semitic? What a circular refutation. Heidigger was no Nazi drone. He was careful to eschew the vulgar anti-semitism of the Nazi ilk.

    Usury is one of the many ways Jews express their hyper-materialism. Jews are often found constructing ponzi schemes, but most of their activities are legal (thanks to lobbying). Their networks, comprised of a plurality of the mega rich in America, will always find ways to circumvent checks on oligarchic power, and gain ascendancy over native elites. That's basic game theory.

    Do you have anything to offer beside ad-hominem, Naxalt bro, and conspiratorial insinuations?

    , @druid
    I am so fed-up with the anti-Semite canard thing! Not working anymore, so give it a rest!
    , @Wally
    "So a sweeping generalisation from a noted Nazi follower and antisemite is your counter-argument, seriously?"

    More juvenile 'Nazi'nonsense.

    aka: Garbage in, garbage out.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the impossible '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.
     
    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com
    , @Grandpa Charlie
    I found the first paragraph much more interesting than the others.

    “Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity” -- Lemurmaniac
     
    The first sentence would seem to be prospective, while the second is retrospective ... from, I suppose, a present of maybe anno 1900. What I mean is that as of about, say, 1900, Heidigger considered Jews to be on an average more materialistic and cosmopolitan -- what we might now think of as more prone toward 'scientism' or rationalism, denying any 'spirit', and more what we might now call 'globalist' -- than gentiles. So, Jews were perhaps better positioned at the onset of the 20th Century than were gentiles.

    The second sentence, by contrast, is retrospective. That is, as of about 1900, looking back into the past, it may have been the case that Jews were given a monopoly on interest-bearing loans, at least the legal ones, although I have read some primary and secondary historical sources that document how Christian (Catholic) clergy were also profiting from such usurious business.

    Certainly, imho, a theory of usury has been incorporated into the concept (or myth?) of 'modernity' by way of popularization of the purely mathematical theory of compound interest. We can see this in the term, "magic of compound interest". Out of this developed the theory of endless economic growth. It was a part of the popular culture propagated by 'financial gurus' for probably the last half of the 20th Century, that money is somehow like a tree, it just naturally grows and, like a tree, the rate of growth just naturally applies continuously to the tree - the new growth and the old growth alike -- just like your bank account where the interest earned is "naturally" capitalized. Much the same equations applied in both situations ... the Chapman-Richards equation and the compound interest equation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=212&v=653DWJmfTK8
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. hyperbola says:
    @Michael Kenny
    The split between Putin’s American supporters and the Jews couldn’t be more obvious or more complete. The Jewish neocons mentioned above all believe in US global hegemony but for them it’s a means to an end. For them, the point of US hegemony is to prop up Israel. They share the view of other hegemonists, including Putin’s American supporters, that the EU is a threat to US hegemony and must be destroyed but give priority to getting rid of Putin over the “war on the EU”. Putin has challenged Israel’s American protector and the instrument for delivering that protection: NATO. He has made matters worse by challenging Israel’s regional hegemony in the Middle East: propping up Assad, threatening to shoot down Israeli planes and snuggling up to Iran. Putin is a bigger threat to Israel then the EU, so it’s Putin now, the EU later. The other hegemonists, including Putin’s American supporters, see US global hegemony as an end in itself. Hubris. The indispensable nation shall not have strange gods before it! They see the EU as a threat and destroying that threat takes priority over everything else. Putin is just a means to that end. Once the EU is destroyed, they’ll probably turn on Putin but, for the moment, he’s a useful idiot in the fight to maintain US global hegemony. Israel itself, indeed, is just a means to the same end: a useful pretext for maintaining hegemony. Thus, the Jewish neocons won’t sacrifice Israel just so as to destroy the EU and Putin’s American supporters won’t sacrifice him just to prop up Israel. The next logical step is therefore for Putin’s supporters to try to install a Putin stooge in Israel.

    The abuse has been going on for a long time.

    A Jewish Defector Warns America: Benjamin Freedman Speaks on Zionism

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Flavius says:
    @Randal

    This is not more complicated than booting Max Boot out of writing business. So why to go for a palliative if you can go for the jugular?
     
    If you think that imposing a general prohibitive wealth tax or somehow banning being rich is "not more complicated" than simply recognising the problems of dual loyalty and ulterior group motives, both in general and in particular relation to jewish elites, and addressing them in some form, then you would seem rather unrealistic to me.

    There has been no convincing argument raised against Giraldi's point - the closest to a response so far seems to be the one you raise here - that jews aren't the only people or groups pushing the US towards war, which is rather irrelevant, and the insistence that not all jewish people do so, which is both obvious and likewise irrelevant.

    Regardless, and whether or not one agrees with Giraldi's particular diagnosis of one aspect of the ills of modern US sphere society (I do, broadly), one should support him and it anyway simply because its expression is so obviously being punished by those who seek to suppress it. His prompt dismissal by the contemptible American Conservative illustrates the truth of the point made by those who complain of politically correct censorship being used by identity lobbyists and those who kowtow to them to control dissent.

    The latter is a far bigger problem in the societies of the modern US sphere than the particular issue of foreign policy identified by Giraldi.

    Spot on.
    Our contemptible media is having a wholesale nervous breakdown over whether a small contingent of mostly empty headed jocks should a) be subject to ordinary employment rules or b) be celebrated for exploiting their 5 minutes of ersatz fame to signal their political solidarity with an ill defined movement that cursory inspection reveals is 99% rubbish. The whole thing is set in a gilded frame so at least we get to laugh at the absurdity of the two faces side by side.
    Meanwhile the disgraceful American Conservative summarily marches Phil Girardi off the plank with a telephone call for having brushed its third rail. Why do I surmise that the call to Girardi was closely preceeded by a call from a ‘donor.’ Contemptible is the word. The mag hasn’t the cajones to make that call to Patrick Buchanan…yet.
    Heartfelt gratitude to Phil Girardi for having exposed to the light of day the rot that has been progressing along the spine of the American Conservative for a very long time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. @Joe Wong
    Making all public elections in the USA public funded only, breaking the laws is a criminal offense with minimum 10 years inprisonment. Limit the Congressmen to two terms and their terms end at the same time. These two actions is way more simpler and effective to get rid of the special interest groups controlling the Congress and the Administration.

    Making all public elections in the USA public funded only, breaking the laws is a criminal offense with minimum 10 years inprisonment. Limit the Congressmen to two terms and their terms end at the same time. These two actions is way more simpler and effective to get rid of the special interest groups controlling the Congress and the Administration.

    But nowhere near far enough..

    The Founders had it right. Only property owners could vote, because the essence of freedom is private property. They never envisioned our insanity however and this must be corrected. Voting must be predicated on having skin in the game, but also (more importantly) predicated on NOT being a beneficiary of government transfer payments or rent-seeking. A simple test:

    If you derive more income from government than you contribute in taxes, you have NO vote. This automatically excludes those on welfare as well as ALL government employees. The abject stupidity of allowing government employees to vote for (their own) higher wages and continued growth of government boggles the mind. Similarly, government contractors such as Lockheed, Boeing, etc can easily be checked to find if they are paid more by government than they contribute in taxes. If they’re funded by government they ARE government and their employees get no vote in how REAL taxpayers’ money is spent.

    The charade that any government employee is a “taxpayer” is so obviously complete bullshit, I have to wonder that anyone could conclude otherwise. They are ALL tax-eaters and ONLY the real taxpayers should have any say in how their confiscated labor and capital are spent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    If you derive more income from government than you contribute in taxes, you have NO vote.
     
    I would love to see that, and also to extend the NO vote to anyone who receives a penny or more from the government including those who work for companies who receive anything from the government. Talk about a conflict of interest!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. anonymos says:

    This article is biased because he has ignored the power of the tribe worldwide. He writes:

    [Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s?]

    He deliberately separates the jews in America from the tribe all over the world. He suddenly forgets that American power rose after WWII to replace the criminal British empire in late 1969, especially in the rich resource region of the Middle East. the Jewish power was on the rise since 1880’s in AMERICA, where they established themselves through slave trade, garment industry, banking and finance, Hollywood and fashion industry, beauty industry.

    The British Empire controlled by Rothschild family, where this family funded their wars to colonize countries in Asia, Africa and the so called Middle East to rob them of their resources which was very important for accumulation of wealth and building their market and creating jobs for their people, like TODAY. . Behind the 1953 coup in Iran was British empire controlled by Jewish Rothschild family where they had important interest in Oil industry, and the new empire going to replace the old one. British Empire could complete with the fresh one which soon going to be controlled by the same tribe.

    Nathan Rothschild said:
    [Nathan said (1777-1836): "I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply." ]

    http://rense.com/general79/tril.htm

    This shows that British Empire like American Empire is controlled by the economic power of the Jewish tribe. The tribe’s power is their WEALTH accumulated by capitalism, a usuary system, where Sombat called it JEWISH.

    The “new world order” is very much designed by people whose wealth is based on control of resources and markets around the world rubbing nation after nation. That’s why this group and their extension want to erect “world government” with ONE CENTRAL BANK and control of worldwide resources to keep the world under their hegemony.

    IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO CUT THEIR ECONOMIC POWER BASE. BOYCOTT THEIR GOODS.
    Palestine was bought by Rothschild family’s money to have a FOOT in rich resource region to put one against the other based on ethnic, religion diversity to rob them . We all ARE UNITED AGAINST THE ENEMY AND THEIR SERVANTS.

    The Fashion industry, like, Hollywood and Banking system is under their control.

    [MORE]

    http://theunhivedmind.com/UHM/the-jewish-controlled-fashion-industry/

    Elsewhere, Estelle Sommers founded the Capezio dancewear brand, Ann Klein [originally Hannah Golofski] has become a widely recognized “designer” brand, as has Donna Karan and her DKNY label. Isaac Mizrahi and Tommy Hilfiger are other famous Jewish fashion brands, as is that of the Iranian-Jewish mogul of perfume and self-promotion, Bijan (Pakzad), also known as the “designer of what’s probably the world’s most expensive menswear.” [DORFMAN] Rudi Gernreich and John Weitz are other Jews who have been prominent fashion designers. Designer Arnold Scassi’s last name is Isaacs (his original surname) spelled backwards. Kenneth Cole (originally: Kenneth Cohen) developed popular lines of shoes, belts, and leather jackets. Judith Lieber manufacturers luxury handbags.
    Liz Claiborne founded her company with her Jewish husband Arthur Ortenberg and Leonard Boxer. She retired in 1989 whereupon Jerome Chazen became chairman of the firm. Other prominent executives in the company are Harvey Falk and Jay Margolis. In 1988, Nicholas Coleridge listed the American “power buyers” (those who buy for stores) of the fashion world. Most of the people listed are Jewish, and a huge percentage of the stores are Jewish-owned:
    “Daria Retain, fashion director of Neiman Marcus; Ellin Saltzman, director of fashion and product development at Saks Fifth Avenue; James Fowler and Mary Talbot, vice-president and design buyer of Jacobsons Stores, Michigan; Kaye von Bergen, designer buyer of Bendel’s; Lois Ziegler and Sue Bicksler, fashion directors of J.C. Penney; Bernie Ozer, vice-president of the Associated Merchandising Corporation; Barbara Weiser of Charivari; Barbara Warner, formerly of Barneys, who virtually single-handedly turned the store into an upbeat designer terminus; Lynne Manulis, president of Marthas; Joan Weinstein, president of Ultimo; James Sullivan, fashion director of Jordan Marsh; Missy Lomonaco, fashion director of Bonwit Teller; Betty Hahn, designer buyer of Garfinkels, Washington; Jean Navin, vice-president and fashion director of Lord & Taylor; Kal Ruttenstein, vice-president and fashion director of Bloomingdales; Terry Melville, fashion director of Macy’s; and Sal Ruggerio of Marshall Field, Chicago.” [COLERIDGE, p. 259]
    In 2000, the National Post noted the heart of the garment district in Montreal, Canada — the Jewish center of Chabenel Street. The article addressed the bribery of store buyers by clothing makers and its long tradition in the Jewish community. (In Yiddish: “Az men shmert nit, fort men nit.” — If you don’t bribe, you don’t ride). Kickbacks, noted Doug Robinson, a Canadian fraud squad officer is “a dirty secret of the industry.” [KUITENBROWER, P., 4-1-2000, p. D1]
    Elsewhere, Israeli-born Elia “Tahari is among the most respected names in department and specialty stores.” [HOOD, p. 1E] In California Severin Wunderman’s company, the Severin Group ($500 million a year in sales), remains “the sole manufacturer, marketer, and distributor of Gucci timepieces and Fila sports watches.” These products’ retail cost run between $225 and $14,000 apiece. “The word ‘demanding’ is repeatedly used to describe [Severin]. In addition to shouting and breaking things, he has tossed more than one cellular phone out the window of his chauffeur-driven Rolls Royce.” The head of the French luxury jewelry firm, Cartier, is also Jewish: Alain Dominique Perrin. In 1996, during a visit to Israel, he announced “plans to donate an unspecified percentage of the revenue from the sale of $10 million worth of jewelry to WIZO [the World International Zionist Organization].” [CASHMAN, 1996, p. 14] Kenneth Jay Lane, “the fake jewelry king,” [HORYN, C., 12-12-99, sec. 9, p. 1] is also Jewish. Nudie Cohen, head of Nudie’s, was the “costume designer who pasted Nashville in rhinestones in the 1940s and ’50s.” [LONGINO, M., 9-8-2000] He supplied the Hollywood/Las Vegas cowboy image to people like Roy Rogers and Gene Autry. Others fitting such stars were “Nathan Turk and his East coast counterpart Rodeo Ben (Bernard Lichtenstein), both Eastern European immigrants” whose “clothes brought western wear into its heyday.” [MOORE, B., 2001, p. E3] Adrian’s was the logo of Adrian Goldberg, a famous dress designer for Hollywood in the 1930s and ’40s. Sidney Toledano is today’s president and CEO of Christian Dior.
    The Chanel company, which makes “the most expensive perfume in the world,” was founded by non-Jew Co Co Chanel, but built to power by the Jewish Wertheimer brothers. As the London Independent notes: “In 1924 [Chanel] sold 90 per cent of the rights to Chanel No. 5 to Pierre Wertheimer, who, with his brother Paul, owned Bourjois, the largest cosmetics company in France … They bought out Chanel — couture house, perfume and all — in 1954.” [JOBEY, L., 11-27-90, p. 12] Feeling that “she was being cheated” by the Wertheimers, Chanel had sued them in 1934. [MOUBRAY, J., 2-10-98, p. 18]

    http://americanjewisharchives.org/publications/journal/PDF/2012_64_01_00_cohen.pdf

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  55. Zumbuddi says:
    @DESERT FOX
    The Zionists have controlled America completely since 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the IRS both of which were sponsored by the Zionist bankers to enable the U.S. to be forced into wars which we taxpayers would be forced into debt and made slaves of the Zionist banking cartel.

    We are not a free country, we are slaves on the Zionist plantation aka Israels colony, and that is the reason we are in perpetual wars for the profit of the Zionists banking cartel, and that is the fact of the matter.

    Very true.
    The Israel Firster meme must be rejected as inaccurate.
    Zionist Jews overthrew USA in 3 or 4 main stages
    1. 1913 Fed Reserve
    2. Creation of American Jewish Congress in Independence Hall Phil’s for specific purpose of influencing Versailles Treaty in order to establish Jewish Palestine & guarantee empowerment of Jews in Europe
    3 AJC became permanent institution, elected FDR, populated FOR admin, partnered with East coast Anglicans to support Stalin &Churchill in project of destroying Germany
    4 ABC operatives & allied institutions — like VIA — took over Germany etc
    5 Israel up & running, Zionists eager to complete cleansing operation & expand & control the entire region. 1979 Bibi & Benzion Netanyahu blueprint for Global War on Terror. COALITION represented is si.ilar to WWII COALITION — Trotskyites, East coast Anglophiles i.e. George H W Bush.

    GWOT may be morphing to a 6th phase in the Jewish overthrow/occupation of USA — Iraq, first big mission of GWOT –was “fight them there so we don’t have to fight them here.” The new phase, w/ Charlottesville as marker, brings the war to The ‘Homeland and destruction of American symbols & Founders
    Notice how ABC created in Independence Hall; GWOT conference on July 4; current phase started in Jefferson s own city & university

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Sherman says:
    @Art
    Around 1968-1970 the Jews became more wealthy than all Americans, and that was it: they ceased to strive for the common good.

    For the next 30 years through excessive debt the Jew Allen Greenspan, head of the Fed, put a stake in the heart of America's economy - end of story.

    Jew dominated corporate America turned its head away from its fiduciary responsibilities to customers, employees, neighbors, investors, and country – they instead turned to raw, naked, personal greed. Junk bonds got the ball rolling.

    In America you no longer do business with your neighbors – you must do business with Wall Street – Wall Street gets a slice of all your spending. Guess what – unlike you neighbors - Wall Street doesn’t give dam about you – PERIOD.

    Companies change ownership with the tough of a keyboard creating great uncertainty for all those invoved. This creates instability.

    Ownership must be returned to local people. Then stability will return to culture.

    Think Peace --- Art

    Hey Genius

    “Allen Greenspan” s/b “Alan Greenspan”.

    Peace
    Sherm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art
    Hey Sherm,

    Thanks for the correction – I can always depend on you. I do what I can with my 88 IQ’s.

    You sound real edgy today – did you just get a whiff of Palestinian blood? How invigorating - we know that really jacks up you Israelis.

    How are the Palestinian’s beaches – getting a good tan?

    (Don’t get to tan – people might think you are a real middle eastern Arabian Jew. (In Israel’s cast system, a guy has to remain Euro looking to get the best Russian girls at the corner brothel.))

    Think Peace --- Art
    , @bjondo
    it matters?

    grinspanz name is made up like most or all jew names
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jake
    The two go hand in hand. The WASP senses of philoSemitism and anti-Irish hatred, to the point of demanding linguistic and cultural genocide - of white Gentile Christians - are two sides of the one coin.

    Jews allied with WASP philo semites to draft Irishmen & blacks & other Americans to marginalize the large German-American population, and go to Europe to kill the ancestors & brothers of the European Americans — especially German, but also French & Italian, who had invested most in creation & building up of America.
    Notice that Ireland remained neutral, and that today, so many of US military leaders are Irish.

    Notice also that once they’d had their use of WASPs, Jews turned on them and worked to wipe them out: Phil Weiss has written of how, as a youngster, his Jewish community thought of nothing more than destroying/displacing/replacing WASPs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Jews are not stupid. They knew that as junior partners to WASPs they has to wait their turn. Their turn came, and they now have become the directing partner of the firm. That happens in every firm. The junior partner, if he does not die early or get cheated by the senior partner, eventually takes over.

    Now, Jews are very much in charge of what some label the Anglo-Zionist Empire. That was inherent in the formation and development of WASP culture. WASP culture was necessary to spread 'the Jewish problem.' In fact, a case can be made that the 'Jewish problem' has been made much worse by WASP culture.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @Wally
    It's just a coincidence, no doubt, that the last THREE Federal Reserve Chairs have been Jews.

    Well, they are dual citizens of Israel as are all the leading Zionists and they should be made to make a choice either they are Israelis or they are Americans, and the obvious answer is they are Zionist Israelis.

    The FED is a privately owned zionist banking cartel that creates money out of thin air and then loans it to the government at interest , a real scam , and of course we ie our government should print the money ourselves and then we would be free of the zionists , but no one has the guts to do it after they saw what the zionists did to JFK and RFK and JFKjr.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Giuseppe says:
    @Jake
    The two go hand in hand. The WASP senses of philoSemitism and anti-Irish hatred, to the point of demanding linguistic and cultural genocide - of white Gentile Christians - are two sides of the one coin.

    I disagree, but either way it’s a matter of cutting off your schmoes to spite your race.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. @Anonymous
    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI...

    When did it all start?

    The answer to the question came from an Israeli diplomat who lectured to a class at Georgetown in the late 1980s, I am told by Professor Alan Sabrosky, who taught at the University, a course on Comparative Foreign Policy, among others, and had 3-4 diplomats from different countries in to the class each semester that at dinner with the Israeli diplomat and two students, he remarked during the conversation that the real turning point in Israel’s approach to the US had come in the wake of the 1956 War, when President Eisenhower had ordered Israel, Britain and France to “cease & desist” and return home. He said the Israeli Embassy tried to get to Congress to reverse that decision, and found that in fact they had access to only two “minor Congressional offices” (his phrase, I remember it clearly says Prof. Alan Sabrosky). So, they set about crafting a network of PACs and other things to reverse that state of affairs. One of the students asked “how many Congressional offices they could access successfully now?” (that was in late 1980s please note)– and with a satisfied smile, he remarked “Almost all of them.” The students faces registered astonishment, so he quickly added words to the effect that “But of course, we don’t control them, they still act in the best interests of the American people,” but the students didn’t believe him, and there you have it….”

    I suppose when so many people in comparable positions have a consensus on something (like “thou shalt not allow criticism of Israel”), you don’t need a conspiracy. There are so many Jewish PACs, besides AIPAC. There exists a coordinating agency called “The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations,” Their website (www.conferenceofpresidents.org/) is worth exploring (and AIPAC is just one of literally dozens of organizations under its umbrella).

    http://www.payvand.com/news/09/feb/1141.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    the real turning point in Israel’s approach to the US had come in the wake of the 1956 War, when President Eisenhower had ordered Israel, Britain and France to “cease & desist” and return home.
     
    Makes sense.
    , @Aren Haich
    Pat Buchanan's remark that Capitol is the Israeli occupied territory has apparently been true for quite some time.
    One may reasonably hope that now, with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump stirring things up and being the two most popular personalities in the American politics, the Israeli lobbies will meet substantial resistance in getting their usual choices elected to the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2018.
    Alabama Primary result today can be a decisive trendsetter.
    , @RobinG
    This is OT everywhere, but while the Ziocons are pushing for wars abroad, who's pushing the clashes at home? (The build-up has started to Nov. 4.)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmNz2jGzsDA
    UNDERCOVER IN ANTIFA: Their Tactics and Media Support Exposed!


    ps - no more catbird seat?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @MarkU

    "Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity"
     
    So a sweeping generalisation from a noted Nazi follower and antisemite is your counter-argument, seriously? I think it absurd to believe that Jews, or indeed any ethnic group can be held to have a 'core identity' in the way described, and then to further illustrate the point you write:-

    "The reason why ‘Italian’ is not a synonym for ‘mafia’ is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal"
     
    You are apparently implying that usury is somehow fundamental to Jewish identity, so Jew would be synonymous with usurer. One more point:-

    "While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit"
     
    It seems to be the case that all criminal enterprises have a tendency towards nepotism/ethnic nepotism (for fairly obvious reasons) It is difficult to believe that WASP banksters would be exempt.

    The question in my mind is, are you a genuine and honest antisemite or are you a banksters paid troll tasked with maintaining the conflation between international usury and Jewish ethnicity?

    So anti-semitism is discredited by being anti-semitic? What a circular refutation. Heidigger was no Nazi drone. He was careful to eschew the vulgar anti-semitism of the Nazi ilk.

    Usury is one of the many ways Jews express their hyper-materialism. Jews are often found constructing ponzi schemes, but most of their activities are legal (thanks to lobbying). Their networks, comprised of a plurality of the mega rich in America, will always find ways to circumvent checks on oligarchic power, and gain ascendancy over native elites. That’s basic game theory.

    Do you have anything to offer beside ad-hominem, Naxalt bro, and conspiratorial insinuations?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. edNels says:
    @Kiza
    This article is a mix of truths and bull. But the key problem with the article is that it never mentions the main tool of the Zionists - the petrodollar and the main conduit of the Zionist power in US - The Federal Reserve. Luckily, China and Russia are working on dethroning FED by diminishing petrodollar. This will have the world-wide beneficial effect of deglobalisation: removing the ability to print money indefinitely will curb the ambitions of both "the rich Jews and the rich who want to be Jews" to rule the World. Power will become distributed again and the Jews will have to compete with the Chinese for domination.

    Diminishing petrodollar is a much healthier solution than the Marxist's solution of removing wealth from the wealthy Jews and wannabe Jews. Once one starts removing wealth from individuals, one does not know where and when to stop.

    [Once one starts removing wealth from individuals, one does not know where and when to stop.]

    Nothing will be done ’cause nothing can be done. Many it seems who would benefit by a minimum wage, seem to be against it ”In Principle”, or just swaged against it by the nativist Horatio A propaganda. So the small thing of a minimum wage hasn’t been successfully implemented.

    But… what if minimum wage was presented combined with a (unheard of ) ”Maximum Wage”. They better make sure that doesn’t ever get started, because that would bring on a complete different dynamic. IE: as the motor mouth Zezek tells a joke from Slovenia, that a neighbor would prefer not to get a free cow, but rather to see his neighbor’s cow destroyed. Base ignorant psychology.

    Combine a minimum wage…even a living stipend… with a maximum renumeration scheme, who would make that happen? the next generation or a benevolent dictator… haha.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. chris says:

    I certainly appreciate Israel standing up for Phil, but not exactly in this way!

    Phil never said Jews should not be in charge of foreign policy, he simply made the terse observation that, as with all other people in the government, it is a matter of policy that one’s ethnicity disqualifies them from shaping policy in areas where their nationality is involved. Phil simply suggested that this policy should apply to them as well, as it has historically.

    That’s a big difference from the assertion made at the beginning of this article!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. I don’t necessarily agree with much of the Jew-bashing that goes on here, although I’ve done my fair share about the issue that they don’t serve in the American armed forces in percentages commensurate to their percent of the population and, in particular, don’t serve in the more dangerous roles in combat arms in numbers equivalent to their numbers in the U.S. population.

    But I’m delighted to no end that there’s a place on the Internet in which people can actually say what they might think about ethnicity and religion, in particularly about the Jews, without censorship.

    I think grievances are best expressed openly so that solutions can be openly discussed and sometimes found rather than suppressed where they simply fester.

    Read More
    • Replies: @chris
    I appreciate the point you're making and as far as free speech is concerned, I certainly agree, it's just that the analysis of the example you gave is not quite complete.

    Along the lines of the point you're making, people may or may not resent the Amish for refusing military service, but how would most people feel if the Amish, while refusing to serve in the military themselves, would be manning many of the DC think tanks and would be urging the rest of us constantly toward different wars?
    , @Karl
    64 longfisher > and, in particular, don’t serve in the more dangerous roles in combat arms in numbers equivalent to their numbers in the U.S. population

    so, put in quotas to make sure that African-Americans get more spots at the US National Laboratories and in the analytic units and in the Innovation units.

    There.... your problems are solved!
    , @Wally
    Yet Jews demanded and got free speech about the impossible '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' banned in 16 European counties & of course, "that shitty little country".

    Jews demand punishment for Thought Crimes.


    The "Holocau$t Industry" in court:

    'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'
     

    "Some stories are true that never happened."
    - Elie Wiesel
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Art says:
    @Sherman
    Hey Genius

    "Allen Greenspan" s/b "Alan Greenspan".

    Peace
    Sherm

    Hey Sherm,

    Thanks for the correction – I can always depend on you. I do what I can with my 88 IQ’s.

    You sound real edgy today – did you just get a whiff of Palestinian blood? How invigorating – we know that really jacks up you Israelis.

    How are the Palestinian’s beaches – getting a good tan?

    (Don’t get to tan – people might think you are a real middle eastern Arabian Jew. (In Israel’s cast system, a guy has to remain Euro looking to get the best Russian girls at the corner brothel.))

    Think Peace — Art

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sherman
    Hey Genius

    I almost forgot:

    "Wall Street doesn't give a dam about you" s/b "Wall Street doesn't give a damn about you".

    Peace
    Sherm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB
    Great article, Shamir.

    And the Jews themselves merely represent a principle older than them, and that will outlast them. Power.

    Any group that focus on power, will be "Jewish", just as the Romans were Jewish, the Athenian were Jewish, the English were Jewish.

    We are not fighting against flesh and blood, but against a Spirit. Jews merely manifest this spirit in our times.

    Rid of the world of flesh and blood Jews, and the Spirit will find another incarnation in a new people.

    For centuries, this Spirit manifested in the most Christian nations of Western Europe, despite Christianity being opposed to power.

    A creed, a theology, a religion is helpless against this Spirit - a person animated by this Spirit can turn any creed into its opposite, without shame.

    Focusing on "forms", external husks, at the expense of the Spirit does not work - Christianity had the "form" of a power-denying creed, but gradually it's Spirit came to mean the opposite of what it's words plainly say, as it still does for many on the alt-right today.

    Jews are the external husks of an animating Spirit - focusing on Jews will solve nothing, as our fight is against powers and principalities and not flesh and blood.

    Do you mean that “Spirit” literally, or just an expression, describing one of fundamental elements of human nature?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @alvin firpo
    the similarities to 1930s germany are startling.

    the similarities to 1930s germany are startling

    Except for the intelligent and informed populace in 1930′s Germany.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. peterAUS says:
    @Debbie Menon
    When did it all start?

    The answer to the question came from an Israeli diplomat who lectured to a class at Georgetown in the late 1980s, I am told by Professor Alan Sabrosky, who taught at the University, a course on Comparative Foreign Policy, among others, and had 3-4 diplomats from different countries in to the class each semester that at dinner with the Israeli diplomat and two students, he remarked during the conversation that the real turning point in Israel's approach to the US had come in the wake of the 1956 War, when President Eisenhower had ordered Israel, Britain and France to "cease & desist" and return home. He said the Israeli Embassy tried to get to Congress to reverse that decision, and found that in fact they had access to only two "minor Congressional offices" (his phrase, I remember it clearly says Prof. Alan Sabrosky). So, they set about crafting a network of PACs and other things to reverse that state of affairs. One of the students asked "how many Congressional offices they could access successfully now?" (that was in late 1980s please note)-- and with a satisfied smile, he remarked "Almost all of them." The students faces registered astonishment, so he quickly added words to the effect that "But of course, we don't control them, they still act in the best interests of the American people," but the students didn't believe him, and there you have it...."

    I suppose when so many people in comparable positions have a consensus on something (like "thou shalt not allow criticism of Israel"), you don't need a conspiracy. There are so many Jewish PACs, besides AIPAC. There exists a coordinating agency called "The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations," Their website (www.conferenceofpresidents.org/) is worth exploring (and AIPAC is just one of literally dozens of organizations under its umbrella).

    http://www.payvand.com/news/09/feb/1141.html

    the real turning point in Israel’s approach to the US had come in the wake of the 1956 War, when President Eisenhower had ordered Israel, Britain and France to “cease & desist” and return home.

    Makes sense.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    While agreeing with Giraldi on the malady, let us discuss the remedy. Would keeping Jews out of foreign policy making actually help? Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s? The Jews weren’t specially prominent before that time, and certainly weren’t overrepresented in the establishment.

    This is an interesting question, but there is a difference between Then and Now.

    In the past, US expansionism was part of the global norm. Imperialism was common and accepted all over the world. Ottomans ruled over a giant empire. Russians kept expanding into Siberia and Central Asia. It also swallowed parts of Central Europe. Manchus took over China and gobbled up more territory as part of Chinese empire. There were native imperialist wars in Africa before white man came. And Mexico was also the product of empire building. Spanish took it from Aztec Imperialists, and the Conquis took more land. And Spanish also took Philippines. Brits and French were creating vast empires. US was created out of empire-building and continued as such.

    So, US warmongering in the past was part of the world norm. Everyone did it. Also, empire-building was seen as glorious for the Whole People. So, even though the elites benefited the most, there was a sense of shared glory among all Britons over the British Empire. All Frenchmen were to share the glory of the French Empire. And US expansion into SW territories was great not only for elites but for Anglo settlers who built new lives in those areas. And it was even good for Mexers in the region because Anglos did so much than Mexers had done before when SW territories had belonged to Mexico. It's like Ramon has it pretty good working for gringos. He was like the Guillermo of his day.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEA-o4IJAic

    So, imperial wars were once part of the norm, and all peoples took part in it. Even small powers did. If not for French Imperialism, the mini-imperialism of the Thais and Viets would have wiped Cambodia off the map. And of course, American Indians had been like childish savages 'genociding' one another before the white man came.

    The glory belonged to ALL the people. It was not just an elite thing. So, when Brits took over India, even British masses could go to India and enjoy the glory of calling a person-of-dot a 'brown sammy'. So, there was shared glory for all people as fellow rulers of the empire. The elites got to lord over the empire, and the white masses got to enjoy privileges too, like calling a person-of-dot a 'bloody coon'.

    https://youtu.be/S8mfOyCySKg?t=39s

    And when Anglo Empire spread across the 'fruited plains'(now the fruity plains), little people gained along with the big people. Sure, the big industrialists got more, but little folks got their little house on the prairie too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt4z16n-3eU

    But then, with the spread of nationalism all around the world and the rise of native elites who felt slighted by European imperialists with their exclusive all-white clubs, there was an anti-imperialist uprising that finally exploded in the 20th century and achieved its goals after WWII when European imperialist nations were on the ropes and bankrupt.

    Still, before imperialism came to be a bad idea, it had been part of the world norm among all peoples... even though Europeans extended it farther than any previous civilization. So, warmongering back then was different from warmongering in the post WWII era. During the Cold War, there was nothing worse than imperialism in the eyes of the world community, at least ideally. This was rather ironic since both US and USSR were great empires or neo-empires that used quasi-imperialist modes in the name of combating imperialism, be it communist or capitalist.

    Cold War was a strange phenom because it exerted great imperialist energies against the threat of the Other imperialism. Pax Americana portrayed itself as representing the 'Free World' against Soviet-Communist Imperialist aggression that held Eastern Europe captive and funded fanatics in Asia, Africa, and Latin America to spread the Marxist virus. In Afghanistan, US purported to back the 'freedom fighters' against Soviet Imperialist occupation.

    Soviets did the same thing against the US. Soviets argued capitalism can only be imperialist. So, US support of right-wing autocrats all over the world was part of the American Imperialist world order. Pax Sovietica promised justice and equality for all peoples under the liberating cause of communism or related ideologies.

    And even though some today say the Cold War was exaggerated and overblown, it was a real conflict between giants. Both great powers did horrible things to win the war or to contain the enemy and to bribe its allies(or puppets). So, the warmongering during that period has to be seen as part of a worldwide struggle. A real struggle of History, as Fukuyama would say.

    So, even though US warmongering and aggression in the past(when Jews did not control America) had their dark side, they were part of the world norm OR part of a great Historical struggle between ideologies, the two that triumphed in WWII with the demise of German, French, British, and Japanese empires.

    But, things are different today. US is the lone superpower and stronger than ever. And yet, all this might is being used to serve the interests of the 2% of the population. Actually, closer to 0.2% of the population, the Jewish globalist elites as most American Jews may not be crazy about all this saber-rattling and grow increasingly critical of Israel's reckless policies.

    Whatever one may say of past imperialism, it served the entire people. When US took SW areas from Mexico, it was for ALL Americans to share in the booty and free tacos. But when US makes a mess of Middle East and North Africa(nations hated by Israel), what do most Americans get from it? Nothing.
    Also, if warmongering during the Cold War had some overarching purpose in the Grand Struggle of ideologies and powers, the new wars are totally petty and narrowly tribal in design. Sure, some neocons try to portray it as a new Grand Struggle. World War IV as Podhoretz called it.

    https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/world-war-iv-how-it-started-what-it-means-and-why-we-have-to-win/

    9/11 was bad stuff, but US was at war with a bunch of ragtag terrorists. How is that WWIV? And what did Iraq have to do with it? If anything, Hussein(vile nasty bugger that he was) ruthlessly clamped down on terrorists. And how could the world have so many 'new hitlers'? Lately, Putin became 'new hitler' ever since he said NO to Poo-Ride parades and 'gay marriage' in Russia. Most perversely, the War on Terror soon morphed into War with Terror. Under Obama, the US was actually working with remnants of Alqaeda(rebranded as 'moderate rebels') to undermine secular modern regimes that kept order and stability in the region. It is incredible that Americans aren't outraged that the war that began against the terrorists who did 9/11 eventually metastasized into war with terrorists against the only secular regimes in the region. (But then, even 9/11 was mostly blowback for US policy in the Middle East. Iran and Iraq had NOTHING to do with it. It was US and Saudis that had funded and created Jihadi forces, esp in Afghanistan, to use against the Soviets and then Iran. US was attacked by the very monster it created with the help of Saudis. Indeed, it is telling that after 9/11, the US did nothing against the very nation, Saudi Arabia, that had been most instrumental in working with US to create monsters like Osama and others. But since Saudis are allies of the US, the Jewish media moguls and deep state overlooked that key detail and spun wild crazy theories about how Iraq and Iran must be destroyed to stop terrorism. What a sick world.)

    All of this was hype. Speak pushily and carry a big Shtick. Cold War may have been exaggerated but it was real enough. Soviets were a great power and did rule over Eastern Europe. And if China had kept good relations with Russia and Mao had more economic sense, the Sino-Soviet alliance might have kept the Cold War going for much longer. Imagine if, with some economic reforms, Chinese labor had combined with Soviet resources and knowhow. Communist power would have been much more formidable. But Mao had a peasant mentality and didn't get modernity.

    Anyway, the nature of today's wars are far more perverse because the world norm has been anti-imperialist since the end of WWII. So, why is US acting like an imperialist power in a world that has no place for imperialism? US freaks out about Russia 'invading' Crimea(when it wasn't invaded) but it feels it has the right to make threats to other nations and wreck Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and maybe Iran and Venezuela too? The fact that most of these victims of US happen to be nations esp hated by Jewish globalists is proof enough that Jewish tribal hostility is at the center of it.

    During the Cold War, many people on both sides knew there were abuses. Surely, there were people in Soviet Union who felt bad about Russian domination over Hungary in 56 and Czechoslovakia in 68. And there were Americans who were sickened by US meddling in Latin America and Asia. But they were seen as maybe necessary because of the domino theory. Soviets felt that if they let one nation go, all others might follow. US felt that if it lost Vietnam, others might follow.

    But we now live in a world that could be peaceful. The world no longer believes in empire. There is no great ideological struggle. Some call West vs Islam a 'clash of civilizations', but it could easily be solved by ending mass immigration or colonization and also be end of US meddling in the Middle East. Leave those people alone. It is Jewish-Israeli paranoia about Iran and Syria and all the rest that led to these useless wars that serve NO ONE but Israel and Jewish globalist-Zionist interests.

    Fukuyama is a real globalist shi*, but he was right in the sense that there is no longer any great ideological struggle. There are Big Ideas but they are hyped and bloated, like homomania or queertianity, which is Jewish proxy of ersatz-christianity.

    If the world just wanted to get along and do business, we could do that and have peace and stability, the kind hoped for by Steven Pinker in BETTER DEVILS OF OUR NATURE.

    Japan doesn't want to fight wars. European nations don't want to conquer nations overseas. Russia wants trade, not more wars. It doesn't even want to take back Lithuania and Estonia. It is even reluctant to take Donbass. China just wants more economic ties. Chinese don't want to have military bases all over nor does it want to export Chinese-ness as world standard. Chinese don't think 'inside every barbarian is a chinaman trying to get out'. Latin America shelved the old struggles. There was a time when every Latin American nation had a serious Marxist insurgency. That is all gone.

    So, what is driving all this madness that is making 21st century into a hellhole?

    1. It is Jewish globalist greed in foreign policy. The desire to use US power to further Jewish Might, esp in the Middle East. As Jews control the US and EU(as vassals of US), they have the two richest parts of the world. But Jews also want to take control of vast Russia with all its resources. The only thing stopping such ambition is Russian nationalism, and this is why Jews seek to undermine it with appeals to 'democracy' and homomania. One problem with this is the goals are too narrow. Jews simply don't identify with most gentiles who make up nations like US or Russia. When Anglos ruled, sure the elites took most for themselves. But they still felt something for the masses. Putin feels something for fellow Russians. Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt felt something for the white masses. Even though they were elites, they were of the same stock as the masses. But Jews don't feel any affinity with the goyim. Sure, Jews will make temporary alliances. So, Jews will unite with Christians against Muslims and then later unite with Muslims against Christians or do both at the same time... like today. Jews will make white Christians hate 'muzzies' and drop bombs in the Middle East.. and then hug Muslim 'refugees' and pretend to protect them from 'racist white Christians'. Jewish contempt for goyim is too deep. Not all Jews feel this way, but many powerful Jews do have this animus. Chinese elites are lowdown and dirty, a bunch of snakes, BUT they feel some sense of solidarity with other Chinese as fellow countrymen. But Jews don't feel any such for the white masses, the 'deplorables' who are hurting. They pretend to care for blacks, but then go about welcoming immigration-colonization to replace urban blacks with Asians, Hindus, Arabs, and Mesos.

    In a way, Jews feel it is to their benefit for the world to be in a state of flux and crisis. After all, if all nations were stable and at peace, they would look to their own domestic affairs. And then, each nation will ask itself, "who has the most power and privilege in our nation?", and the finger might point to Jews. So, in order for nations around the world to not notice Jewish power, they must be made to feel hostility against one another. So, if Americans are angry with Russians, they won't notice who really rules America. That way, Jews can play the role of 'patriots' defending US from Russian 'aggression' and 'influence'. And if Americans are made to hate Iran(as an 'existential threat'), then they won't ask questions about who really rules US foreign policy and why. And why not push some Yellow Peril so that Americans will think China is behind everything... even as Jews played a huge role in bringing China into the globalist economic system. Do business with China but use media power to make China out to be the Princess Dragon Mom.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FILogARZdxc

    If you're a coyote, it's better to have bears, tigers, lions, buffaloes, and etc hate and fight one another. That way, they might not notice you. It's like what the woman does in RASHOMON. She makes her husband and the bandit fight one another while she runs away. It's like YOJIMBO where the ronin makes one clan fight the other clan while sitting pretty in between.

    2. But there is even a bigger threat that will mess up all nations in the 21st century. It is mass migration and demographic imperialism. No group has been more responsible in pushing this than the Jews. This will spell doom and end for Europe and possibly for East Asia and Australia/New Zealand as well. And Canada and US. Europe is esp in trouble as it's being flooded with black Africans who are more muscled, more aggressive, more loutish, and bigger-donged than white men. As Europe is Africanized, white men will be wussified and white women will be womb-colonized into creating vile creatures like Obama and Kaepernick. Europe will become like Morocco or worse.
    With control of Media, Academia, and the Sacred Narrative, Jews have persuaded all these naive native whites into embracing Diversity, Jungle Fever, Replacism, and 'White Guilt and Atonement' as the only way forward. And US is no different.

    For a time following WWII, there was the golden age of universal nationalism when all peoples aspire to be independent and have national independence. At the UN, it was agreed that imperialism is wrong in any part of the world. So, the end of the Cold War seemed to promise the end of imperialism. Indeed, even the first Gulf War was billed as anti-imperialist as Iraq invaded Kuwait. But this act of anti-imperialism and limited war soon turned into prelude for More Wars of even greater imperialist designs. I mean Hussein was small potatoes in grabbing only Kuwait. US will grab entire big nations, at least if Jewish globalists want them occupied or destroyed.

    Anyway, the golden age of nationalism could have been realized to its fullness with the end of the Cold War. The Cold War necessitated both US and USSR to act like imperialist powers in the grand struggle. But with no more such struggle, each people could finally be independent. Indeed, the liberation of each Eastern European nation was seen as the new promise of nationalism. Iron Curtain was no more. Also, the Soviet Union itself birthed many new nations. Russian empire finally came to an end. And it was mostly done peacefully. There was war in Yugoslavia, but at the end of the day, peace was achieved with rise of new nations.
    And it could have been a happy story. And most peoples would have been content with this triumph of Universal Nationalism.

    So, what destroyed it? One was US-warmongering in Middle East and North Africa that led to huge 'refugee' crisis. Another was rise of PC in EU that somehow made 'diversity' sacrosanct. So, it was the duty of white nations to keep allowing in tons of non-whites on some crazy notion that more diversity is good. (If so, why is Latin America and North Africa such a mess?)

    But even more dangerous was the alliance between Jewish globalists and non-white elites & masses all over the world. Non-whites who had once resisted and fought Western Imperialists and told whites to GO HOME now decided to shift into Demographic Imperialist Mode and invade white nations. The reason was crass and obvious. They made a mess of things in their own nations with corruption, violence, and barbarism. And they wanted short-cut to material comfort and social stability in the West. So, these non-whites went from 'whites go home' to 'whites, you better let me in'. And it was Jewish Power that pulled the strings to pressure white nations to take in these POC.
    POC found PC very useful as a moral cover for their crassness. In reality, they failed their own nations and want to flee from their own people and culture to enjoy better material lives in white-made nations. But that would sound crass and shameful. It would mean they would rather run to white success than fix their own failures. So, PC is so useful because it justifies non-white invasion of white nations in moral terms: redress or reparations for white 'exploitation' in the past. Just a lot of crock. POC and PC has led to a strange phenom of "whitey, I hate you, so please let me come live with you".

    So, universal nationalism was destroyed by this new virulent form of globalism. If the West had not allowed mass immigration, non-whites would have worked hard to make their own nations better. But once the gates were open, non-whites figured it would be much easier and faster to have a good life by just moving to the West. Also, it was a great disaster in allowing non-white elites into white elite institutions. When white elites used to send signals like 'no dogs and chinese allowed', non-whites felt slighted and angry and decided to lead their own people in national struggles. But now that Western elite institutions let in non-white elites, the latter would rather join the Elysium club and collaborate with globalist Jews/whites than work for their own kind. This had led to Diversity of Privilege where elites of all color rub shoulders in hogging power, privilege, and influence. In contrast, masses get Diversity of Poverty. While white elites rub shoulders with fancy mulattoes and sophisticated people-of-dot, white masses get punched by nasty thug Negroes and must smell hindu fart in elevators.

    So, they effectively became demographic imperialism, and so, we are moved back into the Age of Empire. Indeed, it is much worse than past imperialism. Back then, whites, the most advanced peoples, went to less developed places and spread science and technology. Also, except for the New World(and Australia), whites didn't have the numbers to replace the natives. So, Africa is still black, South Asia is still brown, and East Asia is still yellow.
    But the current demographic tide into the West will turn white nations into mulatto nations. France will become Morocco-Cameroon. Germany will become Nigeria-Turkey. Sweden will become Somalia-Afghanistan. Why would Jews do something so terrible? After all, Jews are adamant about keeping Israel Jewish and they don't take in any Africans or new Muslims. Jews do this to white nations because they ONLY care about their own power. Jews figure that if all white nations are made 'diverse', there won't be sufficient white solidarity to work against Jews. Also, whites will be too busy bickering with Africans and Muslims to deal with Jews. Also, Jews will work both sides. Jews will go to the non-whites and say, "we are your allies against nazi 'racist' whites" and Jews will go to whites and plead, "Oh help us poor poor Jews from those terrorist antisemitic Muzzies who are like the new nazis."

    As the result of current trends, the 21st century will be even more crucial than the 20th century. It will determine if the West and white race survive at all.

    I was totally with your generally very intelligent comment up until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade, you need to deal with that. White men’s contempt for a particular people make those people more of a curiousity to their womenfolk as in if you try to hide a loaf of bread from someone they are going to want it more. Its that and also the glamorization of athletes in general to hero status. Not to mention, if you hate a people because of your own insecurities, your women know your truth. Also, You must not know a lot of black men to realize how human and insecure they also are, they have the same problems with women that any other men would have and they also pay a major price for the myopic promotion of urban black culture in America and Europe.

    But everything else you said is serious food for thought and very enlightening and well said.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade

    Give him a break. He had some traumatic experiences when in school.
    , @Priss Factor
    I was totally with your generally very intelligent comment up until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade

    What can I do about it? LOL. Do I control mass colonization of EU by masses of black Africans? Do I control pop culture or sports industry? Do I control the media that promote interracism? Do I control the Narrative that makes blacks both sacred-spiritual and studly-sensual in 'Western' culture?

    I have no power over that. I just comment on what I see in the streets and in the media. And that stuff is inescapable. It is all over the place.

    Just connect the dots of demographics and media and white attitudes. You will see that I'm right when I say ACOWW is the greatest threat to whites. Other non-white races may outnumber whites, but they don't nullify white manhood. Even in China or India or Mexico, a lone white man is seen as a Man, an Hombre by the locals. But even when there is one black guy and 10 white guys, black guy is seen as the alpha while whites are cucked.

    This is real.
    , @Wally
    per the CDC:

    Blacks and Gays Lead STD Rates
    http://www.catholicleague.org/blacks-and-gays-lead-with-std-rates/
    excerpt:
    "After decades of the most progressive sex education programs in our nation’s history, and the most massive distribution of free condoms ever undertaken, never has the rate of sexually transmitted diseases been worse. The rates among blacks and homosexuals are astonishing.

    Blacks comprise roughly 13% of the U.S. population, yet they account for 55.4% of all gonorrhea cases and 50.6% of all syphilis cases. Even more disturbing are the rates for chlamydia and gonorrhea among blacks in the 0-4 age group: no racial or ethnic group comes close to them"

    STD rates hit another record high, with California near the top
    http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-ln-std-rates-20170926-story.html

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. druid says:
    @Priss Factor
    While agreeing with Giraldi on the malady, let us discuss the remedy. Would keeping Jews out of foreign policy making actually help? Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s? The Jews weren’t specially prominent before that time, and certainly weren’t overrepresented in the establishment.

    This is an interesting question, but there is a difference between Then and Now.

    In the past, US expansionism was part of the global norm. Imperialism was common and accepted all over the world. Ottomans ruled over a giant empire. Russians kept expanding into Siberia and Central Asia. It also swallowed parts of Central Europe. Manchus took over China and gobbled up more territory as part of Chinese empire. There were native imperialist wars in Africa before white man came. And Mexico was also the product of empire building. Spanish took it from Aztec Imperialists, and the Conquis took more land. And Spanish also took Philippines. Brits and French were creating vast empires. US was created out of empire-building and continued as such.

    So, US warmongering in the past was part of the world norm. Everyone did it. Also, empire-building was seen as glorious for the Whole People. So, even though the elites benefited the most, there was a sense of shared glory among all Britons over the British Empire. All Frenchmen were to share the glory of the French Empire. And US expansion into SW territories was great not only for elites but for Anglo settlers who built new lives in those areas. And it was even good for Mexers in the region because Anglos did so much than Mexers had done before when SW territories had belonged to Mexico. It's like Ramon has it pretty good working for gringos. He was like the Guillermo of his day.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEA-o4IJAic

    So, imperial wars were once part of the norm, and all peoples took part in it. Even small powers did. If not for French Imperialism, the mini-imperialism of the Thais and Viets would have wiped Cambodia off the map. And of course, American Indians had been like childish savages 'genociding' one another before the white man came.

    The glory belonged to ALL the people. It was not just an elite thing. So, when Brits took over India, even British masses could go to India and enjoy the glory of calling a person-of-dot a 'brown sammy'. So, there was shared glory for all people as fellow rulers of the empire. The elites got to lord over the empire, and the white masses got to enjoy privileges too, like calling a person-of-dot a 'bloody coon'.

    https://youtu.be/S8mfOyCySKg?t=39s

    And when Anglo Empire spread across the 'fruited plains'(now the fruity plains), little people gained along with the big people. Sure, the big industrialists got more, but little folks got their little house on the prairie too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt4z16n-3eU

    But then, with the spread of nationalism all around the world and the rise of native elites who felt slighted by European imperialists with their exclusive all-white clubs, there was an anti-imperialist uprising that finally exploded in the 20th century and achieved its goals after WWII when European imperialist nations were on the ropes and bankrupt.

    Still, before imperialism came to be a bad idea, it had been part of the world norm among all peoples... even though Europeans extended it farther than any previous civilization. So, warmongering back then was different from warmongering in the post WWII era. During the Cold War, there was nothing worse than imperialism in the eyes of the world community, at least ideally. This was rather ironic since both US and USSR were great empires or neo-empires that used quasi-imperialist modes in the name of combating imperialism, be it communist or capitalist.

    Cold War was a strange phenom because it exerted great imperialist energies against the threat of the Other imperialism. Pax Americana portrayed itself as representing the 'Free World' against Soviet-Communist Imperialist aggression that held Eastern Europe captive and funded fanatics in Asia, Africa, and Latin America to spread the Marxist virus. In Afghanistan, US purported to back the 'freedom fighters' against Soviet Imperialist occupation.

    Soviets did the same thing against the US. Soviets argued capitalism can only be imperialist. So, US support of right-wing autocrats all over the world was part of the American Imperialist world order. Pax Sovietica promised justice and equality for all peoples under the liberating cause of communism or related ideologies.

    And even though some today say the Cold War was exaggerated and overblown, it was a real conflict between giants. Both great powers did horrible things to win the war or to contain the enemy and to bribe its allies(or puppets). So, the warmongering during that period has to be seen as part of a worldwide struggle. A real struggle of History, as Fukuyama would say.

    So, even though US warmongering and aggression in the past(when Jews did not control America) had their dark side, they were part of the world norm OR part of a great Historical struggle between ideologies, the two that triumphed in WWII with the demise of German, French, British, and Japanese empires.

    But, things are different today. US is the lone superpower and stronger than ever. And yet, all this might is being used to serve the interests of the 2% of the population. Actually, closer to 0.2% of the population, the Jewish globalist elites as most American Jews may not be crazy about all this saber-rattling and grow increasingly critical of Israel's reckless policies.

    Whatever one may say of past imperialism, it served the entire people. When US took SW areas from Mexico, it was for ALL Americans to share in the booty and free tacos. But when US makes a mess of Middle East and North Africa(nations hated by Israel), what do most Americans get from it? Nothing.
    Also, if warmongering during the Cold War had some overarching purpose in the Grand Struggle of ideologies and powers, the new wars are totally petty and narrowly tribal in design. Sure, some neocons try to portray it as a new Grand Struggle. World War IV as Podhoretz called it.

    https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/world-war-iv-how-it-started-what-it-means-and-why-we-have-to-win/

    9/11 was bad stuff, but US was at war with a bunch of ragtag terrorists. How is that WWIV? And what did Iraq have to do with it? If anything, Hussein(vile nasty bugger that he was) ruthlessly clamped down on terrorists. And how could the world have so many 'new hitlers'? Lately, Putin became 'new hitler' ever since he said NO to Poo-Ride parades and 'gay marriage' in Russia. Most perversely, the War on Terror soon morphed into War with Terror. Under Obama, the US was actually working with remnants of Alqaeda(rebranded as 'moderate rebels') to undermine secular modern regimes that kept order and stability in the region. It is incredible that Americans aren't outraged that the war that began against the terrorists who did 9/11 eventually metastasized into war with terrorists against the only secular regimes in the region. (But then, even 9/11 was mostly blowback for US policy in the Middle East. Iran and Iraq had NOTHING to do with it. It was US and Saudis that had funded and created Jihadi forces, esp in Afghanistan, to use against the Soviets and then Iran. US was attacked by the very monster it created with the help of Saudis. Indeed, it is telling that after 9/11, the US did nothing against the very nation, Saudi Arabia, that had been most instrumental in working with US to create monsters like Osama and others. But since Saudis are allies of the US, the Jewish media moguls and deep state overlooked that key detail and spun wild crazy theories about how Iraq and Iran must be destroyed to stop terrorism. What a sick world.)

    All of this was hype. Speak pushily and carry a big Shtick. Cold War may have been exaggerated but it was real enough. Soviets were a great power and did rule over Eastern Europe. And if China had kept good relations with Russia and Mao had more economic sense, the Sino-Soviet alliance might have kept the Cold War going for much longer. Imagine if, with some economic reforms, Chinese labor had combined with Soviet resources and knowhow. Communist power would have been much more formidable. But Mao had a peasant mentality and didn't get modernity.

    Anyway, the nature of today's wars are far more perverse because the world norm has been anti-imperialist since the end of WWII. So, why is US acting like an imperialist power in a world that has no place for imperialism? US freaks out about Russia 'invading' Crimea(when it wasn't invaded) but it feels it has the right to make threats to other nations and wreck Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and maybe Iran and Venezuela too? The fact that most of these victims of US happen to be nations esp hated by Jewish globalists is proof enough that Jewish tribal hostility is at the center of it.

    During the Cold War, many people on both sides knew there were abuses. Surely, there were people in Soviet Union who felt bad about Russian domination over Hungary in 56 and Czechoslovakia in 68. And there were Americans who were sickened by US meddling in Latin America and Asia. But they were seen as maybe necessary because of the domino theory. Soviets felt that if they let one nation go, all others might follow. US felt that if it lost Vietnam, others might follow.

    But we now live in a world that could be peaceful. The world no longer believes in empire. There is no great ideological struggle. Some call West vs Islam a 'clash of civilizations', but it could easily be solved by ending mass immigration or colonization and also be end of US meddling in the Middle East. Leave those people alone. It is Jewish-Israeli paranoia about Iran and Syria and all the rest that led to these useless wars that serve NO ONE but Israel and Jewish globalist-Zionist interests.

    Fukuyama is a real globalist shi*, but he was right in the sense that there is no longer any great ideological struggle. There are Big Ideas but they are hyped and bloated, like homomania or queertianity, which is Jewish proxy of ersatz-christianity.

    If the world just wanted to get along and do business, we could do that and have peace and stability, the kind hoped for by Steven Pinker in BETTER DEVILS OF OUR NATURE.

    Japan doesn't want to fight wars. European nations don't want to conquer nations overseas. Russia wants trade, not more wars. It doesn't even want to take back Lithuania and Estonia. It is even reluctant to take Donbass. China just wants more economic ties. Chinese don't want to have military bases all over nor does it want to export Chinese-ness as world standard. Chinese don't think 'inside every barbarian is a chinaman trying to get out'. Latin America shelved the old struggles. There was a time when every Latin American nation had a serious Marxist insurgency. That is all gone.

    So, what is driving all this madness that is making 21st century into a hellhole?

    1. It is Jewish globalist greed in foreign policy. The desire to use US power to further Jewish Might, esp in the Middle East. As Jews control the US and EU(as vassals of US), they have the two richest parts of the world. But Jews also want to take control of vast Russia with all its resources. The only thing stopping such ambition is Russian nationalism, and this is why Jews seek to undermine it with appeals to 'democracy' and homomania. One problem with this is the goals are too narrow. Jews simply don't identify with most gentiles who make up nations like US or Russia. When Anglos ruled, sure the elites took most for themselves. But they still felt something for the masses. Putin feels something for fellow Russians. Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt felt something for the white masses. Even though they were elites, they were of the same stock as the masses. But Jews don't feel any affinity with the goyim. Sure, Jews will make temporary alliances. So, Jews will unite with Christians against Muslims and then later unite with Muslims against Christians or do both at the same time... like today. Jews will make white Christians hate 'muzzies' and drop bombs in the Middle East.. and then hug Muslim 'refugees' and pretend to protect them from 'racist white Christians'. Jewish contempt for goyim is too deep. Not all Jews feel this way, but many powerful Jews do have this animus. Chinese elites are lowdown and dirty, a bunch of snakes, BUT they feel some sense of solidarity with other Chinese as fellow countrymen. But Jews don't feel any such for the white masses, the 'deplorables' who are hurting. They pretend to care for blacks, but then go about welcoming immigration-colonization to replace urban blacks with Asians, Hindus, Arabs, and Mesos.

    In a way, Jews feel it is to their benefit for the world to be in a state of flux and crisis. After all, if all nations were stable and at peace, they would look to their own domestic affairs. And then, each nation will ask itself, "who has the most power and privilege in our nation?", and the finger might point to Jews. So, in order for nations around the world to not notice Jewish power, they must be made to feel hostility against one another. So, if Americans are angry with Russians, they won't notice who really rules America. That way, Jews can play the role of 'patriots' defending US from Russian 'aggression' and 'influence'. And if Americans are made to hate Iran(as an 'existential threat'), then they won't ask questions about who really rules US foreign policy and why. And why not push some Yellow Peril so that Americans will think China is behind everything... even as Jews played a huge role in bringing China into the globalist economic system. Do business with China but use media power to make China out to be the Princess Dragon Mom.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FILogARZdxc

    If you're a coyote, it's better to have bears, tigers, lions, buffaloes, and etc hate and fight one another. That way, they might not notice you. It's like what the woman does in RASHOMON. She makes her husband and the bandit fight one another while she runs away. It's like YOJIMBO where the ronin makes one clan fight the other clan while sitting pretty in between.

    2. But there is even a bigger threat that will mess up all nations in the 21st century. It is mass migration and demographic imperialism. No group has been more responsible in pushing this than the Jews. This will spell doom and end for Europe and possibly for East Asia and Australia/New Zealand as well. And Canada and US. Europe is esp in trouble as it's being flooded with black Africans who are more muscled, more aggressive, more loutish, and bigger-donged than white men. As Europe is Africanized, white men will be wussified and white women will be womb-colonized into creating vile creatures like Obama and Kaepernick. Europe will become like Morocco or worse.
    With control of Media, Academia, and the Sacred Narrative, Jews have persuaded all these naive native whites into embracing Diversity, Jungle Fever, Replacism, and 'White Guilt and Atonement' as the only way forward. And US is no different.

    For a time following WWII, there was the golden age of universal nationalism when all peoples aspire to be independent and have national independence. At the UN, it was agreed that imperialism is wrong in any part of the world. So, the end of the Cold War seemed to promise the end of imperialism. Indeed, even the first Gulf War was billed as anti-imperialist as Iraq invaded Kuwait. But this act of anti-imperialism and limited war soon turned into prelude for More Wars of even greater imperialist designs. I mean Hussein was small potatoes in grabbing only Kuwait. US will grab entire big nations, at least if Jewish globalists want them occupied or destroyed.

    Anyway, the golden age of nationalism could have been realized to its fullness with the end of the Cold War. The Cold War necessitated both US and USSR to act like imperialist powers in the grand struggle. But with no more such struggle, each people could finally be independent. Indeed, the liberation of each Eastern European nation was seen as the new promise of nationalism. Iron Curtain was no more. Also, the Soviet Union itself birthed many new nations. Russian empire finally came to an end. And it was mostly done peacefully. There was war in Yugoslavia, but at the end of the day, peace was achieved with rise of new nations.
    And it could have been a happy story. And most peoples would have been content with this triumph of Universal Nationalism.

    So, what destroyed it? One was US-warmongering in Middle East and North Africa that led to huge 'refugee' crisis. Another was rise of PC in EU that somehow made 'diversity' sacrosanct. So, it was the duty of white nations to keep allowing in tons of non-whites on some crazy notion that more diversity is good. (If so, why is Latin America and North Africa such a mess?)

    But even more dangerous was the alliance between Jewish globalists and non-white elites & masses all over the world. Non-whites who had once resisted and fought Western Imperialists and told whites to GO HOME now decided to shift into Demographic Imperialist Mode and invade white nations. The reason was crass and obvious. They made a mess of things in their own nations with corruption, violence, and barbarism. And they wanted short-cut to material comfort and social stability in the West. So, these non-whites went from 'whites go home' to 'whites, you better let me in'. And it was Jewish Power that pulled the strings to pressure white nations to take in these POC.
    POC found PC very useful as a moral cover for their crassness. In reality, they failed their own nations and want to flee from their own people and culture to enjoy better material lives in white-made nations. But that would sound crass and shameful. It would mean they would rather run to white success than fix their own failures. So, PC is so useful because it justifies non-white invasion of white nations in moral terms: redress or reparations for white 'exploitation' in the past. Just a lot of crock. POC and PC has led to a strange phenom of "whitey, I hate you, so please let me come live with you".

    So, universal nationalism was destroyed by this new virulent form of globalism. If the West had not allowed mass immigration, non-whites would have worked hard to make their own nations better. But once the gates were open, non-whites figured it would be much easier and faster to have a good life by just moving to the West. Also, it was a great disaster in allowing non-white elites into white elite institutions. When white elites used to send signals like 'no dogs and chinese allowed', non-whites felt slighted and angry and decided to lead their own people in national struggles. But now that Western elite institutions let in non-white elites, the latter would rather join the Elysium club and collaborate with globalist Jews/whites than work for their own kind. This had led to Diversity of Privilege where elites of all color rub shoulders in hogging power, privilege, and influence. In contrast, masses get Diversity of Poverty. While white elites rub shoulders with fancy mulattoes and sophisticated people-of-dot, white masses get punched by nasty thug Negroes and must smell hindu fart in elevators.

    So, they effectively became demographic imperialism, and so, we are moved back into the Age of Empire. Indeed, it is much worse than past imperialism. Back then, whites, the most advanced peoples, went to less developed places and spread science and technology. Also, except for the New World(and Australia), whites didn't have the numbers to replace the natives. So, Africa is still black, South Asia is still brown, and East Asia is still yellow.
    But the current demographic tide into the West will turn white nations into mulatto nations. France will become Morocco-Cameroon. Germany will become Nigeria-Turkey. Sweden will become Somalia-Afghanistan. Why would Jews do something so terrible? After all, Jews are adamant about keeping Israel Jewish and they don't take in any Africans or new Muslims. Jews do this to white nations because they ONLY care about their own power. Jews figure that if all white nations are made 'diverse', there won't be sufficient white solidarity to work against Jews. Also, whites will be too busy bickering with Africans and Muslims to deal with Jews. Also, Jews will work both sides. Jews will go to the non-whites and say, "we are your allies against nazi 'racist' whites" and Jews will go to whites and plead, "Oh help us poor poor Jews from those terrorist antisemitic Muzzies who are like the new nazis."

    As the result of current trends, the 21st century will be even more crucial than the 20th century. It will determine if the West and white race survive at all.

    911 was an inside job!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @Randal

    This is not more complicated than booting Max Boot out of writing business. So why to go for a palliative if you can go for the jugular?
     
    If you think that imposing a general prohibitive wealth tax or somehow banning being rich is "not more complicated" than simply recognising the problems of dual loyalty and ulterior group motives, both in general and in particular relation to jewish elites, and addressing them in some form, then you would seem rather unrealistic to me.

    There has been no convincing argument raised against Giraldi's point - the closest to a response so far seems to be the one you raise here - that jews aren't the only people or groups pushing the US towards war, which is rather irrelevant, and the insistence that not all jewish people do so, which is both obvious and likewise irrelevant.

    Regardless, and whether or not one agrees with Giraldi's particular diagnosis of one aspect of the ills of modern US sphere society (I do, broadly), one should support him and it anyway simply because its expression is so obviously being punished by those who seek to suppress it. His prompt dismissal by the contemptible American Conservative illustrates the truth of the point made by those who complain of politically correct censorship being used by identity lobbyists and those who kowtow to them to control dissent.

    The latter is a far bigger problem in the societies of the modern US sphere than the particular issue of foreign policy identified by Giraldi.

    The problem most egregious is control of information and communications. U.S. citizens lack knowledge of their Government’s decisions and actions. An example of this control is Israel’s deliberate attack on the U.S. “Liberty” [ship] which was in international waters. Between Johnson’s collusion with Israel and a controlled media, most Americans were not then and are not now aware that the country that receives the most U.S. tax dollars attacked a U.S. ship and killed 34 sailors and wounded 170. This happened June 8, 1967. Moreover, most citizens have not been informed that Israel was selling U.S. provided technology to the Chinese which was absolutely illegal. Israel’s illegal act may have been mentioned once or twice on U.S.TV networks. Has the U.S. media addressed the fact that Israel has not declared borders? How can the Palestinians recognize Israel when Israel will not acknowledge it has borders? The old canard that it is anti-Semitic to criticize Israel is used to restrict the constitutional right of free speech. If one has the legal right to criticize his/her country, one certainly has the legal right to criticize any other country on this earth without retribution! Our universities and colleges should never subject students to retribution for exercising free speech! Giraldi and many others should be published and granted time on television to rebut those presenting Israel’s causes.

    Read More
    • Agree: Grandpa Charlie
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. bjondo says:
    @Sherman
    Hey Genius

    "Allen Greenspan" s/b "Alan Greenspan".

    Peace
    Sherm

    it matters?

    grinspanz name is made up like most or all jew names

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. utu says:
    @Giuseppe

    He said that all Yankees are Jews, behave like Jews, aspire to be Jews and even are circumcised like Jews.
     
    Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.

    Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.

    In rationalization it might be so but rationalization is always a post factor justification. There is more to it than just hygienic reasons.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Giuseppe
    Sure, cultural reasons, people wanted to emulate the better classes where the practice started and to dissociate themselves from the despised immigrants and hicks.

    Hygiene just catalyzed a large number of circumcisions with the Victorian germophobia and fear of tuberculosis after Koch's postulates. After critical mass was achieved, the practice began to take off . Hygiene is often invoked today but the real reasons remain cultural.

    Mom, apple pie and circumcision.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. bjondo says:

    This is Shamir’s weakest article. One that borders on deceiving.
    Seems to be using truth to protect BS (@11, kiza, mix of truth and bull).
    Jew will be pleased with this article by IS. Maybe the 1st time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  75. peterAUS says:
    @Priss Factor
    While agreeing with Giraldi on the malady, let us discuss the remedy. Would keeping Jews out of foreign policy making actually help? Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s? The Jews weren’t specially prominent before that time, and certainly weren’t overrepresented in the establishment.

    This is an interesting question, but there is a difference between Then and Now.

    In the past, US expansionism was part of the global norm. Imperialism was common and accepted all over the world. Ottomans ruled over a giant empire. Russians kept expanding into Siberia and Central Asia. It also swallowed parts of Central Europe. Manchus took over China and gobbled up more territory as part of Chinese empire. There were native imperialist wars in Africa before white man came. And Mexico was also the product of empire building. Spanish took it from Aztec Imperialists, and the Conquis took more land. And Spanish also took Philippines. Brits and French were creating vast empires. US was created out of empire-building and continued as such.

    So, US warmongering in the past was part of the world norm. Everyone did it. Also, empire-building was seen as glorious for the Whole People. So, even though the elites benefited the most, there was a sense of shared glory among all Britons over the British Empire. All Frenchmen were to share the glory of the French Empire. And US expansion into SW territories was great not only for elites but for Anglo settlers who built new lives in those areas. And it was even good for Mexers in the region because Anglos did so much than Mexers had done before when SW territories had belonged to Mexico. It's like Ramon has it pretty good working for gringos. He was like the Guillermo of his day.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEA-o4IJAic

    So, imperial wars were once part of the norm, and all peoples took part in it. Even small powers did. If not for French Imperialism, the mini-imperialism of the Thais and Viets would have wiped Cambodia off the map. And of course, American Indians had been like childish savages 'genociding' one another before the white man came.

    The glory belonged to ALL the people. It was not just an elite thing. So, when Brits took over India, even British masses could go to India and enjoy the glory of calling a person-of-dot a 'brown sammy'. So, there was shared glory for all people as fellow rulers of the empire. The elites got to lord over the empire, and the white masses got to enjoy privileges too, like calling a person-of-dot a 'bloody coon'.

    https://youtu.be/S8mfOyCySKg?t=39s

    And when Anglo Empire spread across the 'fruited plains'(now the fruity plains), little people gained along with the big people. Sure, the big industrialists got more, but little folks got their little house on the prairie too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt4z16n-3eU

    But then, with the spread of nationalism all around the world and the rise of native elites who felt slighted by European imperialists with their exclusive all-white clubs, there was an anti-imperialist uprising that finally exploded in the 20th century and achieved its goals after WWII when European imperialist nations were on the ropes and bankrupt.

    Still, before imperialism came to be a bad idea, it had been part of the world norm among all peoples... even though Europeans extended it farther than any previous civilization. So, warmongering back then was different from warmongering in the post WWII era. During the Cold War, there was nothing worse than imperialism in the eyes of the world community, at least ideally. This was rather ironic since both US and USSR were great empires or neo-empires that used quasi-imperialist modes in the name of combating imperialism, be it communist or capitalist.

    Cold War was a strange phenom because it exerted great imperialist energies against the threat of the Other imperialism. Pax Americana portrayed itself as representing the 'Free World' against Soviet-Communist Imperialist aggression that held Eastern Europe captive and funded fanatics in Asia, Africa, and Latin America to spread the Marxist virus. In Afghanistan, US purported to back the 'freedom fighters' against Soviet Imperialist occupation.

    Soviets did the same thing against the US. Soviets argued capitalism can only be imperialist. So, US support of right-wing autocrats all over the world was part of the American Imperialist world order. Pax Sovietica promised justice and equality for all peoples under the liberating cause of communism or related ideologies.

    And even though some today say the Cold War was exaggerated and overblown, it was a real conflict between giants. Both great powers did horrible things to win the war or to contain the enemy and to bribe its allies(or puppets). So, the warmongering during that period has to be seen as part of a worldwide struggle. A real struggle of History, as Fukuyama would say.

    So, even though US warmongering and aggression in the past(when Jews did not control America) had their dark side, they were part of the world norm OR part of a great Historical struggle between ideologies, the two that triumphed in WWII with the demise of German, French, British, and Japanese empires.

    But, things are different today. US is the lone superpower and stronger than ever. And yet, all this might is being used to serve the interests of the 2% of the population. Actually, closer to 0.2% of the population, the Jewish globalist elites as most American Jews may not be crazy about all this saber-rattling and grow increasingly critical of Israel's reckless policies.

    Whatever one may say of past imperialism, it served the entire people. When US took SW areas from Mexico, it was for ALL Americans to share in the booty and free tacos. But when US makes a mess of Middle East and North Africa(nations hated by Israel), what do most Americans get from it? Nothing.
    Also, if warmongering during the Cold War had some overarching purpose in the Grand Struggle of ideologies and powers, the new wars are totally petty and narrowly tribal in design. Sure, some neocons try to portray it as a new Grand Struggle. World War IV as Podhoretz called it.

    https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/world-war-iv-how-it-started-what-it-means-and-why-we-have-to-win/

    9/11 was bad stuff, but US was at war with a bunch of ragtag terrorists. How is that WWIV? And what did Iraq have to do with it? If anything, Hussein(vile nasty bugger that he was) ruthlessly clamped down on terrorists. And how could the world have so many 'new hitlers'? Lately, Putin became 'new hitler' ever since he said NO to Poo-Ride parades and 'gay marriage' in Russia. Most perversely, the War on Terror soon morphed into War with Terror. Under Obama, the US was actually working with remnants of Alqaeda(rebranded as 'moderate rebels') to undermine secular modern regimes that kept order and stability in the region. It is incredible that Americans aren't outraged that the war that began against the terrorists who did 9/11 eventually metastasized into war with terrorists against the only secular regimes in the region. (But then, even 9/11 was mostly blowback for US policy in the Middle East. Iran and Iraq had NOTHING to do with it. It was US and Saudis that had funded and created Jihadi forces, esp in Afghanistan, to use against the Soviets and then Iran. US was attacked by the very monster it created with the help of Saudis. Indeed, it is telling that after 9/11, the US did nothing against the very nation, Saudi Arabia, that had been most instrumental in working with US to create monsters like Osama and others. But since Saudis are allies of the US, the Jewish media moguls and deep state overlooked that key detail and spun wild crazy theories about how Iraq and Iran must be destroyed to stop terrorism. What a sick world.)

    All of this was hype. Speak pushily and carry a big Shtick. Cold War may have been exaggerated but it was real enough. Soviets were a great power and did rule over Eastern Europe. And if China had kept good relations with Russia and Mao had more economic sense, the Sino-Soviet alliance might have kept the Cold War going for much longer. Imagine if, with some economic reforms, Chinese labor had combined with Soviet resources and knowhow. Communist power would have been much more formidable. But Mao had a peasant mentality and didn't get modernity.

    Anyway, the nature of today's wars are far more perverse because the world norm has been anti-imperialist since the end of WWII. So, why is US acting like an imperialist power in a world that has no place for imperialism? US freaks out about Russia 'invading' Crimea(when it wasn't invaded) but it feels it has the right to make threats to other nations and wreck Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and maybe Iran and Venezuela too? The fact that most of these victims of US happen to be nations esp hated by Jewish globalists is proof enough that Jewish tribal hostility is at the center of it.

    During the Cold War, many people on both sides knew there were abuses. Surely, there were people in Soviet Union who felt bad about Russian domination over Hungary in 56 and Czechoslovakia in 68. And there were Americans who were sickened by US meddling in Latin America and Asia. But they were seen as maybe necessary because of the domino theory. Soviets felt that if they let one nation go, all others might follow. US felt that if it lost Vietnam, others might follow.

    But we now live in a world that could be peaceful. The world no longer believes in empire. There is no great ideological struggle. Some call West vs Islam a 'clash of civilizations', but it could easily be solved by ending mass immigration or colonization and also be end of US meddling in the Middle East. Leave those people alone. It is Jewish-Israeli paranoia about Iran and Syria and all the rest that led to these useless wars that serve NO ONE but Israel and Jewish globalist-Zionist interests.

    Fukuyama is a real globalist shi*, but he was right in the sense that there is no longer any great ideological struggle. There are Big Ideas but they are hyped and bloated, like homomania or queertianity, which is Jewish proxy of ersatz-christianity.

    If the world just wanted to get along and do business, we could do that and have peace and stability, the kind hoped for by Steven Pinker in BETTER DEVILS OF OUR NATURE.

    Japan doesn't want to fight wars. European nations don't want to conquer nations overseas. Russia wants trade, not more wars. It doesn't even want to take back Lithuania and Estonia. It is even reluctant to take Donbass. China just wants more economic ties. Chinese don't want to have military bases all over nor does it want to export Chinese-ness as world standard. Chinese don't think 'inside every barbarian is a chinaman trying to get out'. Latin America shelved the old struggles. There was a time when every Latin American nation had a serious Marxist insurgency. That is all gone.

    So, what is driving all this madness that is making 21st century into a hellhole?

    1. It is Jewish globalist greed in foreign policy. The desire to use US power to further Jewish Might, esp in the Middle East. As Jews control the US and EU(as vassals of US), they have the two richest parts of the world. But Jews also want to take control of vast Russia with all its resources. The only thing stopping such ambition is Russian nationalism, and this is why Jews seek to undermine it with appeals to 'democracy' and homomania. One problem with this is the goals are too narrow. Jews simply don't identify with most gentiles who make up nations like US or Russia. When Anglos ruled, sure the elites took most for themselves. But they still felt something for the masses. Putin feels something for fellow Russians. Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt felt something for the white masses. Even though they were elites, they were of the same stock as the masses. But Jews don't feel any affinity with the goyim. Sure, Jews will make temporary alliances. So, Jews will unite with Christians against Muslims and then later unite with Muslims against Christians or do both at the same time... like today. Jews will make white Christians hate 'muzzies' and drop bombs in the Middle East.. and then hug Muslim 'refugees' and pretend to protect them from 'racist white Christians'. Jewish contempt for goyim is too deep. Not all Jews feel this way, but many powerful Jews do have this animus. Chinese elites are lowdown and dirty, a bunch of snakes, BUT they feel some sense of solidarity with other Chinese as fellow countrymen. But Jews don't feel any such for the white masses, the 'deplorables' who are hurting. They pretend to care for blacks, but then go about welcoming immigration-colonization to replace urban blacks with Asians, Hindus, Arabs, and Mesos.

    In a way, Jews feel it is to their benefit for the world to be in a state of flux and crisis. After all, if all nations were stable and at peace, they would look to their own domestic affairs. And then, each nation will ask itself, "who has the most power and privilege in our nation?", and the finger might point to Jews. So, in order for nations around the world to not notice Jewish power, they must be made to feel hostility against one another. So, if Americans are angry with Russians, they won't notice who really rules America. That way, Jews can play the role of 'patriots' defending US from Russian 'aggression' and 'influence'. And if Americans are made to hate Iran(as an 'existential threat'), then they won't ask questions about who really rules US foreign policy and why. And why not push some Yellow Peril so that Americans will think China is behind everything... even as Jews played a huge role in bringing China into the globalist economic system. Do business with China but use media power to make China out to be the Princess Dragon Mom.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FILogARZdxc

    If you're a coyote, it's better to have bears, tigers, lions, buffaloes, and etc hate and fight one another. That way, they might not notice you. It's like what the woman does in RASHOMON. She makes her husband and the bandit fight one another while she runs away. It's like YOJIMBO where the ronin makes one clan fight the other clan while sitting pretty in between.

    2. But there is even a bigger threat that will mess up all nations in the 21st century. It is mass migration and demographic imperialism. No group has been more responsible in pushing this than the Jews. This will spell doom and end for Europe and possibly for East Asia and Australia/New Zealand as well. And Canada and US. Europe is esp in trouble as it's being flooded with black Africans who are more muscled, more aggressive, more loutish, and bigger-donged than white men. As Europe is Africanized, white men will be wussified and white women will be womb-colonized into creating vile creatures like Obama and Kaepernick. Europe will become like Morocco or worse.
    With control of Media, Academia, and the Sacred Narrative, Jews have persuaded all these naive native whites into embracing Diversity, Jungle Fever, Replacism, and 'White Guilt and Atonement' as the only way forward. And US is no different.

    For a time following WWII, there was the golden age of universal nationalism when all peoples aspire to be independent and have national independence. At the UN, it was agreed that imperialism is wrong in any part of the world. So, the end of the Cold War seemed to promise the end of imperialism. Indeed, even the first Gulf War was billed as anti-imperialist as Iraq invaded Kuwait. But this act of anti-imperialism and limited war soon turned into prelude for More Wars of even greater imperialist designs. I mean Hussein was small potatoes in grabbing only Kuwait. US will grab entire big nations, at least if Jewish globalists want them occupied or destroyed.

    Anyway, the golden age of nationalism could have been realized to its fullness with the end of the Cold War. The Cold War necessitated both US and USSR to act like imperialist powers in the grand struggle. But with no more such struggle, each people could finally be independent. Indeed, the liberation of each Eastern European nation was seen as the new promise of nationalism. Iron Curtain was no more. Also, the Soviet Union itself birthed many new nations. Russian empire finally came to an end. And it was mostly done peacefully. There was war in Yugoslavia, but at the end of the day, peace was achieved with rise of new nations.
    And it could have been a happy story. And most peoples would have been content with this triumph of Universal Nationalism.

    So, what destroyed it? One was US-warmongering in Middle East and North Africa that led to huge 'refugee' crisis. Another was rise of PC in EU that somehow made 'diversity' sacrosanct. So, it was the duty of white nations to keep allowing in tons of non-whites on some crazy notion that more diversity is good. (If so, why is Latin America and North Africa such a mess?)

    But even more dangerous was the alliance between Jewish globalists and non-white elites & masses all over the world. Non-whites who had once resisted and fought Western Imperialists and told whites to GO HOME now decided to shift into Demographic Imperialist Mode and invade white nations. The reason was crass and obvious. They made a mess of things in their own nations with corruption, violence, and barbarism. And they wanted short-cut to material comfort and social stability in the West. So, these non-whites went from 'whites go home' to 'whites, you better let me in'. And it was Jewish Power that pulled the strings to pressure white nations to take in these POC.
    POC found PC very useful as a moral cover for their crassness. In reality, they failed their own nations and want to flee from their own people and culture to enjoy better material lives in white-made nations. But that would sound crass and shameful. It would mean they would rather run to white success than fix their own failures. So, PC is so useful because it justifies non-white invasion of white nations in moral terms: redress or reparations for white 'exploitation' in the past. Just a lot of crock. POC and PC has led to a strange phenom of "whitey, I hate you, so please let me come live with you".

    So, universal nationalism was destroyed by this new virulent form of globalism. If the West had not allowed mass immigration, non-whites would have worked hard to make their own nations better. But once the gates were open, non-whites figured it would be much easier and faster to have a good life by just moving to the West. Also, it was a great disaster in allowing non-white elites into white elite institutions. When white elites used to send signals like 'no dogs and chinese allowed', non-whites felt slighted and angry and decided to lead their own people in national struggles. But now that Western elite institutions let in non-white elites, the latter would rather join the Elysium club and collaborate with globalist Jews/whites than work for their own kind. This had led to Diversity of Privilege where elites of all color rub shoulders in hogging power, privilege, and influence. In contrast, masses get Diversity of Poverty. While white elites rub shoulders with fancy mulattoes and sophisticated people-of-dot, white masses get punched by nasty thug Negroes and must smell hindu fart in elevators.

    So, they effectively became demographic imperialism, and so, we are moved back into the Age of Empire. Indeed, it is much worse than past imperialism. Back then, whites, the most advanced peoples, went to less developed places and spread science and technology. Also, except for the New World(and Australia), whites didn't have the numbers to replace the natives. So, Africa is still black, South Asia is still brown, and East Asia is still yellow.
    But the current demographic tide into the West will turn white nations into mulatto nations. France will become Morocco-Cameroon. Germany will become Nigeria-Turkey. Sweden will become Somalia-Afghanistan. Why would Jews do something so terrible? After all, Jews are adamant about keeping Israel Jewish and they don't take in any Africans or new Muslims. Jews do this to white nations because they ONLY care about their own power. Jews figure that if all white nations are made 'diverse', there won't be sufficient white solidarity to work against Jews. Also, whites will be too busy bickering with Africans and Muslims to deal with Jews. Also, Jews will work both sides. Jews will go to the non-whites and say, "we are your allies against nazi 'racist' whites" and Jews will go to whites and plead, "Oh help us poor poor Jews from those terrorist antisemitic Muzzies who are like the new nazis."

    As the result of current trends, the 21st century will be even more crucial than the 20th century. It will determine if the West and white race survive at all.

    The elites got to lord over the empire, and the white masses got to enjoy privileges too, like calling a person-of-dot a ‘bloody coon’.

    But, things are different today. US is the lone superpower and stronger than ever. And yet, all this might is being used to serve the interests of the 2% of the population.

    NOW we are talking.
    So, all that was O.K. before because a common person in US had benefits he/she wanted.
    But, NOW, he/she doesn’t share those benefits. So, it’s not O.K.

    So, if benefits were shared now, that (imperialism, war etc…) would be O.K. again.

    Whoah.

    Nice.

    We remove those Jews, get back to “our” bunch and voila….we are back to business.
    Same business for the rest of the world, just it benefits US now.

    Nice…..very….very nice…….

    Why nobody said all that before?

    No need for all this…blathereing….”erudite philosophy” etc.
    We……….just…………want………….SPOILS………of…………..The……..Empire.
    They have it, we want it, let’s get it.

    Just

    for ALL Americans to share in the booty

    ………..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    NOW we are talking.
    So, all that was O.K. before because a common person in US had benefits he/she wanted.
    But, NOW, he/she doesn’t share those benefits. So, it’s not O.K.
    So, if benefits were shared now, that (imperialism, war etc…) would be O.K. again.

    No, you misunderstand me. I think we should oppose ALL forms of imperialism today. And I mean all forms.

    But we can't judge the historical past by principles and values that came later. There was a time when imperialism was the norm among all great and even minor powers. And it was true that in those days, imperialism was a Shared Project that benefited or glorified everyone among the winners. So, it had an element of democracy.

    But even that element is gone from today's imperialism that benefits only the globalist elites.

    Of course, we should oppose and condemn any kind of imperialism today.

    But globalists are pushing for US-dominant military interventions against nations hated by Israel and for massive demographic imperialism that will permanently change the character of nations. This demographic imperialism benefits Jewish elites(as they get to play divide and rule) and the masses of third world invaders(who mooch off and replace whites). Replacist Imperialism must go.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. druid says:
    @Chris Chuba
    Totally agree with Shamir on the larger point, neoconservatism in the U.S. is much larger than the prominent Jews who support it. It's a mania inspired by a country that has had extraordinary power and an exaggerated feeling of self-importance. Any group of people will exploit it.

    You get buffoons like Hillary Clinton, Rubio, Chris Christi, Jeb Bush, ... all in agreement when she says, 'we are great because we are good', what arrogance, why not say, 'we are great because I am good'.

    Yes, but these people you mentioned are bought off by the Jewish neocon Zionists!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. utu says:
    @anon
    I was totally with your generally very intelligent comment up until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade, you need to deal with that. White men's contempt for a particular people make those people more of a curiousity to their womenfolk as in if you try to hide a loaf of bread from someone they are going to want it more. Its that and also the glamorization of athletes in general to hero status. Not to mention, if you hate a people because of your own insecurities, your women know your truth. Also, You must not know a lot of black men to realize how human and insecure they also are, they have the same problems with women that any other men would have and they also pay a major price for the myopic promotion of urban black culture in America and Europe.

    But everything else you said is serious food for thought and very enlightening and well said.

    until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade

    Give him a break. He had some traumatic experiences when in school.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    When I was in school, interracism was not the thing. In the city school, whites and blacks usually kept apart and had different culture and music. Also, within the 4 yrs I was there, whites had pretty much left for the suburbs and I was one of the later ones to move out of blackening area. (Now, much of it has been reversed with gentrification and the Negroes are popping up in the 'burbs. I hate these yuppies.)

    Also, in high school, there were very few blacks in my heavily white/Jewish school. Now, the school is 10% black and the blacks are dominating all the sports teams. So, you can guess they are now humping the white girls. When I was in high school, white music was separate from black music, and few white girls were into black culture. But then, Rap and Hip Hop happened, and madonna and her ilk promoted interracism which became a norm in pop culture, and millennials grew up as a cuck generation.

    Things are much worse NOW.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. druid says:
    @MarkU

    "Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity"
     
    So a sweeping generalisation from a noted Nazi follower and antisemite is your counter-argument, seriously? I think it absurd to believe that Jews, or indeed any ethnic group can be held to have a 'core identity' in the way described, and then to further illustrate the point you write:-

    "The reason why ‘Italian’ is not a synonym for ‘mafia’ is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal"
     
    You are apparently implying that usury is somehow fundamental to Jewish identity, so Jew would be synonymous with usurer. One more point:-

    "While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit"
     
    It seems to be the case that all criminal enterprises have a tendency towards nepotism/ethnic nepotism (for fairly obvious reasons) It is difficult to believe that WASP banksters would be exempt.

    The question in my mind is, are you a genuine and honest antisemite or are you a banksters paid troll tasked with maintaining the conflation between international usury and Jewish ethnicity?

    I am so fed-up with the anti-Semite canard thing! Not working anymore, so give it a rest!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. It’s not healthy for democracy when any circumscribed group (note I didn’t say circumsized!) gains far more wealth and power for itself that are too far out from demographics. This sort of thing isn’t “good for the Jews” if you mean everyone in that group, as there will be a backlash of resentment against the innocent, rather than the few whose greed makes everyone else look bad. This is a problem of lack of self restraint for capitalists in general, regardless of ethnicity or culture. Certainly the Jewish religion is not approving. There will always be a ready unsavory audience for anti-semitism. Why feed it through the selfishness of a few? And assigning the blame to Jewishness specifically, allows all capitalists to get off scot free by labeling opposition to their malign practices antisemitism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  80. Giuseppe says:
    @utu
    Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.

    In rationalization it might be so but rationalization is always a post factor justification. There is more to it than just hygienic reasons.

    Sure, cultural reasons, people wanted to emulate the better classes where the practice started and to dissociate themselves from the despised immigrants and hicks.

    Hygiene just catalyzed a large number of circumcisions with the Victorian germophobia and fear of tuberculosis after Koch’s postulates. After critical mass was achieved, the practice began to take off . Hygiene is often invoked today but the real reasons remain cultural.

    Mom, apple pie and circumcision.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
    Circumcision was an established practice before the Irish were created
    , @utu
    Circumcision was promoted by Jews. There was no cultural reason for Christians to perform it. However Jews saw it that their mimicry would be more successful among circumcised Christians. No "drop-you-pants-test."

    There are known case sof Jewish doctors boasting of how many circumcisions they performed during the WWII on dumb unsuspecting GI's.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Sherman says:
    @Art
    Hey Sherm,

    Thanks for the correction – I can always depend on you. I do what I can with my 88 IQ’s.

    You sound real edgy today – did you just get a whiff of Palestinian blood? How invigorating - we know that really jacks up you Israelis.

    How are the Palestinian’s beaches – getting a good tan?

    (Don’t get to tan – people might think you are a real middle eastern Arabian Jew. (In Israel’s cast system, a guy has to remain Euro looking to get the best Russian girls at the corner brothel.))

    Think Peace --- Art

    Hey Genius

    I almost forgot:

    “Wall Street doesn’t give a dam about you” s/b “Wall Street doesn’t give a damn about you”.

    Peace
    Sherm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Jake says:
    @anonymous
    Jews allied with WASP philo semites to draft Irishmen & blacks & other Americans to marginalize the large German-American population, and go to Europe to kill the ancestors & brothers of the European Americans -- especially German, but also French & Italian, who had invested most in creation & building up of America.
    Notice that Ireland remained neutral, and that today, so many of US military leaders are Irish.

    Notice also that once they'd had their use of WASPs, Jews turned on them and worked to wipe them out: Phil Weiss has written of how, as a youngster, his Jewish community thought of nothing more than destroying/displacing/replacing WASPs.

    Jews are not stupid. They knew that as junior partners to WASPs they has to wait their turn. Their turn came, and they now have become the directing partner of the firm. That happens in every firm. The junior partner, if he does not die early or get cheated by the senior partner, eventually takes over.

    Now, Jews are very much in charge of what some label the Anglo-Zionist Empire. That was inherent in the formation and development of WASP culture. WASP culture was necessary to spread ‘the Jewish problem.’ In fact, a case can be made that the ‘Jewish problem’ has been made much worse by WASP culture.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    You are onto something here.

    Certain parameters favoring two power groups, "senior" and "junior", sharing power.
    In time "junior" group simply took over.

    And I do agree that the "senior" group created all that.

    My....theory.....is...it was The Holocaust.

    Invented by both but pushed hard by the "senior" during the Cold War.

    Well.....the story took over....and because it favoured "junior" partner here we are.......

    Simple I guess.

    And uncomfortable for sure.
    , @Wally
    Oh really?

    Below is from: 'The Spirit Of Militarism', by Zionist Jew Nahum Goldmann
    Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress

    "The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone."
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. peterAUS says:
    @Jake
    Jews are not stupid. They knew that as junior partners to WASPs they has to wait their turn. Their turn came, and they now have become the directing partner of the firm. That happens in every firm. The junior partner, if he does not die early or get cheated by the senior partner, eventually takes over.

    Now, Jews are very much in charge of what some label the Anglo-Zionist Empire. That was inherent in the formation and development of WASP culture. WASP culture was necessary to spread 'the Jewish problem.' In fact, a case can be made that the 'Jewish problem' has been made much worse by WASP culture.

    You are onto something here.

    Certain parameters favoring two power groups, “senior” and “junior”, sharing power.
    In time “junior” group simply took over.

    And I do agree that the “senior” group created all that.

    My….theory…..is…it was The Holocaust.

    Invented by both but pushed hard by the “senior” during the Cold War.

    Well…..the story took over….and because it favoured “junior” partner here we are…….

    Simple I guess.

    And uncomfortable for sure.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. chris says:
    @longfisher
    I don't necessarily agree with much of the Jew-bashing that goes on here, although I've done my fair share about the issue that they don't serve in the American armed forces in percentages commensurate to their percent of the population and, in particular, don't serve in the more dangerous roles in combat arms in numbers equivalent to their numbers in the U.S. population.

    But I'm delighted to no end that there's a place on the Internet in which people can actually say what they might think about ethnicity and religion, in particularly about the Jews, without censorship.

    I think grievances are best expressed openly so that solutions can be openly discussed and sometimes found rather than suppressed where they simply fester.

    I appreciate the point you’re making and as far as free speech is concerned, I certainly agree, it’s just that the analysis of the example you gave is not quite complete.

    Along the lines of the point you’re making, people may or may not resent the Amish for refusing military service, but how would most people feel if the Amish, while refusing to serve in the military themselves, would be manning many of the DC think tanks and would be urging the rest of us constantly toward different wars?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23
    Good point. The Amish live by their own traditions in a society apart and that's fine.

    They don't aim to gain political power over the majority, determine US foreign policy, head the FED and Treasury and control the media.

    It's the exploitative POLITICAL interference of a 2% Jewish minority in the affairs of the Gentile 98% majority that's the root of the problem in US Facade Democracy.
    , @Orville H. Larson
    Personally, I've got nothing against the Amish for refusing military service. They don't warmonger, nor do they demand that others go and fight. That kind of man, I can respect.

    I despise the armchair commando, Israel-First chickenhawks who are always screaming for more war(s). These gutless wonders wouldn't dream of wearing the uniform themselves, but they're happy to see others serve as cannon fodder.

    Bastards.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Realist says:

    While it is true that some Jews strive for wealth and power, many non Jews do also. What I very much dislike is the development of asinine ‘financial products’ (scams). These are cooked up by greedy bastards, both Jewish and non Jewish..
    I believe it is well known that Ashkenazi Jews on average have a very high IQ. Most use their ability to further mankind, medicine, science and the like. There are a few that use their ability to take advantage of those of lesser intellect, but the percentage is quite small. Those that choose to take the low road are usually very good at their scams, thus giving Jews a bad reputation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  86. Wally says: • Website
    @MarkU

    "Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity"
     
    So a sweeping generalisation from a noted Nazi follower and antisemite is your counter-argument, seriously? I think it absurd to believe that Jews, or indeed any ethnic group can be held to have a 'core identity' in the way described, and then to further illustrate the point you write:-

    "The reason why ‘Italian’ is not a synonym for ‘mafia’ is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal"
     
    You are apparently implying that usury is somehow fundamental to Jewish identity, so Jew would be synonymous with usurer. One more point:-

    "While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit"
     
    It seems to be the case that all criminal enterprises have a tendency towards nepotism/ethnic nepotism (for fairly obvious reasons) It is difficult to believe that WASP banksters would be exempt.

    The question in my mind is, are you a genuine and honest antisemite or are you a banksters paid troll tasked with maintaining the conflation between international usury and Jewish ethnicity?

    “So a sweeping generalisation from a noted Nazi follower and antisemite is your counter-argument, seriously?”

    More juvenile ‘Nazi’nonsense.

    aka: Garbage in, garbage out.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    We’re talking about an alleged ’6M Jews & 5M others’ … 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Wally says: • Website
    @Jake
    Jews are not stupid. They knew that as junior partners to WASPs they has to wait their turn. Their turn came, and they now have become the directing partner of the firm. That happens in every firm. The junior partner, if he does not die early or get cheated by the senior partner, eventually takes over.

    Now, Jews are very much in charge of what some label the Anglo-Zionist Empire. That was inherent in the formation and development of WASP culture. WASP culture was necessary to spread 'the Jewish problem.' In fact, a case can be made that the 'Jewish problem' has been made much worse by WASP culture.

    Oh really?

    Below is from: ‘The Spirit Of Militarism’, by Zionist Jew Nahum Goldmann
    Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress

    “The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Goldmann hat über deutscher Nationalismus geredet, aber du hast das schon gekannt.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. @anon
    I was totally with your generally very intelligent comment up until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade, you need to deal with that. White men's contempt for a particular people make those people more of a curiousity to their womenfolk as in if you try to hide a loaf of bread from someone they are going to want it more. Its that and also the glamorization of athletes in general to hero status. Not to mention, if you hate a people because of your own insecurities, your women know your truth. Also, You must not know a lot of black men to realize how human and insecure they also are, they have the same problems with women that any other men would have and they also pay a major price for the myopic promotion of urban black culture in America and Europe.

    But everything else you said is serious food for thought and very enlightening and well said.

    I was totally with your generally very intelligent comment up until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade

    What can I do about it? LOL. Do I control mass colonization of EU by masses of black Africans? Do I control pop culture or sports industry? Do I control the media that promote interracism? Do I control the Narrative that makes blacks both sacred-spiritual and studly-sensual in ‘Western’ culture?

    I have no power over that. I just comment on what I see in the streets and in the media. And that stuff is inescapable. It is all over the place.

    Just connect the dots of demographics and media and white attitudes. You will see that I’m right when I say ACOWW is the greatest threat to whites. Other non-white races may outnumber whites, but they don’t nullify white manhood. Even in China or India or Mexico, a lone white man is seen as a Man, an Hombre by the locals. But even when there is one black guy and 10 white guys, black guy is seen as the alpha while whites are cucked.

    This is real.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    This all comes from a loss of dignity but we have to take ownership for that...pornography and the cuckery that it breeds is consumed by a whole of white men. There is definitely perversion within our own ranks and I have seen it myself...I have mostly seen white men who get off on watching other men fucking their wives or consuming black on blonde style pornography. The powers that be want you to lose your religion but never forget that they aren't losing theirs. Its true that things are not what they used to be but we also are nothing like our grandfathers and men of those older eras. I rarely see any self reflection in posts from people who want to blame others for their issues....in this sense, a lot of white men are not too different from the black men they criticize for always playing the victim card.
    I am not aiming that last statement at you in particular cuz most of your original post was on point, but honor, dignity and chivalry are not valued by mass numbers of white men who have allowed indecency to pervert them. I
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @utu
    until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade

    Give him a break. He had some traumatic experiences when in school.

    When I was in school, interracism was not the thing. In the city school, whites and blacks usually kept apart and had different culture and music. Also, within the 4 yrs I was there, whites had pretty much left for the suburbs and I was one of the later ones to move out of blackening area. (Now, much of it has been reversed with gentrification and the Negroes are popping up in the ‘burbs. I hate these yuppies.)

    Also, in high school, there were very few blacks in my heavily white/Jewish school. Now, the school is 10% black and the blacks are dominating all the sports teams. So, you can guess they are now humping the white girls. When I was in high school, white music was separate from black music, and few white girls were into black culture. But then, Rap and Hip Hop happened, and madonna and her ilk promoted interracism which became a norm in pop culture, and millennials grew up as a cuck generation.

    Things are much worse NOW.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. @peterAUS

    The elites got to lord over the empire, and the white masses got to enjoy privileges too, like calling a person-of-dot a ‘bloody coon’.
     

    But, things are different today. US is the lone superpower and stronger than ever. And yet, all this might is being used to serve the interests of the 2% of the population.
     
    NOW we are talking.
    So, all that was O.K. before because a common person in US had benefits he/she wanted.
    But, NOW, he/she doesn’t share those benefits. So, it’s not O.K.

    So, if benefits were shared now, that (imperialism, war etc…) would be O.K. again.

    Whoah.

    Nice.

    We remove those Jews, get back to “our” bunch and voila….we are back to business.
    Same business for the rest of the world, just it benefits US now.

    Nice…..very….very nice…….

    Why nobody said all that before?

    No need for all this…blathereing….”erudite philosophy” etc.
    We……….just…………want………….SPOILS………of…………..The……..Empire.
    They have it, we want it, let's get it.

    Just

    for ALL Americans to share in the booty
     
    ………..

    NOW we are talking.
    So, all that was O.K. before because a common person in US had benefits he/she wanted.
    But, NOW, he/she doesn’t share those benefits. So, it’s not O.K.
    So, if benefits were shared now, that (imperialism, war etc…) would be O.K. again.

    No, you misunderstand me. I think we should oppose ALL forms of imperialism today. And I mean all forms.

    But we can’t judge the historical past by principles and values that came later. There was a time when imperialism was the norm among all great and even minor powers. And it was true that in those days, imperialism was a Shared Project that benefited or glorified everyone among the winners. So, it had an element of democracy.

    But even that element is gone from today’s imperialism that benefits only the globalist elites.

    Of course, we should oppose and condemn any kind of imperialism today.

    But globalists are pushing for US-dominant military interventions against nations hated by Israel and for massive demographic imperialism that will permanently change the character of nations. This demographic imperialism benefits Jewish elites(as they get to play divide and rule) and the masses of third world invaders(who mooch off and replace whites). Replacist Imperialism must go.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    You do make sense, of course.

    You'll forgive me for being a little unbelieving, though.

    Based on known history of humankind in general and US history in particular I just can't buy that should we get rid of American Jews the imperial wars would just stop.
    Sorry, I am not buying that for a second.

    Should American Jews go as a power group another power group would feel that vacuum.
    At the moment the most likely is the old guard.....the Anglo group.

    And looking at the past work of that group one has to be delusional to believe all would be fine and dandy.

    One could almost get a feeling that blaming Jewish American group for the ills of The Empire is.......nice play...........
    Smart....smooth.........play..........

    Almost as being used by one group against another.
    And neither gives a shit about us.
    Little guys.

    Just a feeling, mind you.

    , @anon
    We have been pimping our own women out way before black culture did it, when we pulled women out of the household in the name of their liberty to serve capitalism, this itself is a form of pimping. When we sell everything from beer to a car using a woman's sexuality, is this not a form of pimping? How about how white culture has also been detrimental to black people, do you know how many black women think its hip to be a stripper now? Strip clubs, pornography and all that shit came from us first but now it is also running rampant in the black culture....its fickle minded to blame this on others when our culture has fallen apart with us enjoying the ride and getting off on it...we sold out our happiness for pleasure and of course there are parasites who profit off this..but its our own weakness that sets the stage for this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. @Debbie Menon
    When did it all start?

    The answer to the question came from an Israeli diplomat who lectured to a class at Georgetown in the late 1980s, I am told by Professor Alan Sabrosky, who taught at the University, a course on Comparative Foreign Policy, among others, and had 3-4 diplomats from different countries in to the class each semester that at dinner with the Israeli diplomat and two students, he remarked during the conversation that the real turning point in Israel's approach to the US had come in the wake of the 1956 War, when President Eisenhower had ordered Israel, Britain and France to "cease & desist" and return home. He said the Israeli Embassy tried to get to Congress to reverse that decision, and found that in fact they had access to only two "minor Congressional offices" (his phrase, I remember it clearly says Prof. Alan Sabrosky). So, they set about crafting a network of PACs and other things to reverse that state of affairs. One of the students asked "how many Congressional offices they could access successfully now?" (that was in late 1980s please note)-- and with a satisfied smile, he remarked "Almost all of them." The students faces registered astonishment, so he quickly added words to the effect that "But of course, we don't control them, they still act in the best interests of the American people," but the students didn't believe him, and there you have it...."

    I suppose when so many people in comparable positions have a consensus on something (like "thou shalt not allow criticism of Israel"), you don't need a conspiracy. There are so many Jewish PACs, besides AIPAC. There exists a coordinating agency called "The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations," Their website (www.conferenceofpresidents.org/) is worth exploring (and AIPAC is just one of literally dozens of organizations under its umbrella).

    http://www.payvand.com/news/09/feb/1141.html

    Pat Buchanan’s remark that Capitol is the Israeli occupied territory has apparently been true for quite some time.
    One may reasonably hope that now, with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump stirring things up and being the two most popular personalities in the American politics, the Israeli lobbies will meet substantial resistance in getting their usual choices elected to the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2018.
    Alabama Primary result today can be a decisive trendsetter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Debbie Menon
    I recall my delight when Eric Cantor the staunch, powerful Israeli stooge in the Senate was thrown out of office Boom! In the most public way imaginable. “It’s still very vivid, indelibly etched,” he was beaten by a little known David Brat in the primaries. Cantor had outspent him, outpolled him, and had every reason to believe that he was headed for an eighth term. Cantor was the first sitting House majority leader in history to lose his congressional seat, a defeat so unexpected that it shocked the unshockable political establishment, which called it one of the greatest political upsets of modern times. It can be done. Go people!! #MAGA
    , @Debbie Menon
    Recall the staunch Israeli stooge Eric Cantor's defeat ?

    The next day, the National Journal’s Ron Fournier penned a warning with this headline:
    “Elites Beware: Eric Cantor’s Defeat May Signal a Populist Revolution.”

    Voters believed: Time to blow it up and start over.

    Go people! You can do it! #MAGA.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @wayfarer
    Rothschild Zionists
    Est. 1813
    “We Finance Serial-Murder!”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XvwSV0u0JE

    This illustrates how entirely minimalist Giraldi is in his discussion that is tangential to the question as to whether or not there are Zionist neocons working within the govt. of the USA who are actually guilty of treason to some degree or another.

    Giraldi does not even broach 9-11 truth … he is very careful, circumspect and minimalist in everything he writes, perhaps because he is dogged by the CIA or perhaps because he anticipates being called to testify before a grand jury some day soon, not as a defendant but as an expert witness. Or maybe it’s just that he has too much respect for the truth to engage in hyperbole.

    Read More
    • Replies: @wayfarer
    Philip Grialdi disseminates some truth, calls a spade-a-spade, and he's issued a pink slip.

    This speaks volumes.

    Truth has always drawn fire. Recently it's been under heavy fire, sustaining severe wounds.

    But fortunately according to Buddha, “Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.”

    So we can expect truth to eventually make a full recovery.

    Of course, this recovery can be facilitated by individuals willing to support the truth.

    http://www.pray4zion.org/images/graphics/arabrefugeesinarablands.png
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. peterAUS says:
    @Priss Factor
    NOW we are talking.
    So, all that was O.K. before because a common person in US had benefits he/she wanted.
    But, NOW, he/she doesn’t share those benefits. So, it’s not O.K.
    So, if benefits were shared now, that (imperialism, war etc…) would be O.K. again.

    No, you misunderstand me. I think we should oppose ALL forms of imperialism today. And I mean all forms.

    But we can't judge the historical past by principles and values that came later. There was a time when imperialism was the norm among all great and even minor powers. And it was true that in those days, imperialism was a Shared Project that benefited or glorified everyone among the winners. So, it had an element of democracy.

    But even that element is gone from today's imperialism that benefits only the globalist elites.

    Of course, we should oppose and condemn any kind of imperialism today.

    But globalists are pushing for US-dominant military interventions against nations hated by Israel and for massive demographic imperialism that will permanently change the character of nations. This demographic imperialism benefits Jewish elites(as they get to play divide and rule) and the masses of third world invaders(who mooch off and replace whites). Replacist Imperialism must go.

    You do make sense, of course.

    You’ll forgive me for being a little unbelieving, though.

    Based on known history of humankind in general and US history in particular I just can’t buy that should we get rid of American Jews the imperial wars would just stop.
    Sorry, I am not buying that for a second.

    Should American Jews go as a power group another power group would feel that vacuum.
    At the moment the most likely is the old guard…..the Anglo group.

    And looking at the past work of that group one has to be delusional to believe all would be fine and dandy.

    One could almost get a feeling that blaming Jewish American group for the ills of The Empire is…….nice play………..
    Smart….smooth………play……….

    Almost as being used by one group against another.
    And neither gives a shit about us.
    Little guys.

    Just a feeling, mind you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Based on known history of humankind in general and US history in particular I just can’t buy that should we get rid of American Jews the imperial wars would just stop.
    Sorry, I am not buying that for a second.

    I never said it would end. I said US foreign policy wouldn't be so narrow and petty. Also, it would be more difficult for US to wage wars. Not impossible. Just more difficult.

    Just think. Most ethnic groups in the US aren't interested in world affairs. Greek-Americans may be upset over Cyprus, but I can't see them controlling US policy to wage war on Turkey. Polish-Americans are pissed about Russia and Germany, but I don't see them controlling US foreign policy to have another war in Europe. Chinese Americans may feel some feeling for mother country, but Chinese don't have the personality to become pushy leaders of US power. Blacks are into themselves and don't care about foreign affairs. Mexicans are for Mexico and care nothing for the rest of the world.

    The only people who might push for more warmongering are Anglo-Americans with their long history of imperialism. But, without Jewish alliance, it would be much more difficult. At least with alliance with Jews, the war can be sold as 'protecting democratic Israel and preventing another hitler'. But without Jews, White Anglo Imperialism would be much more difficult to sell as 'white power' and 'white privilege' are denounced endlessly as 'racist'.

    Also, Jewish Power isn't just in government. It is in finance, academia, thinktanks, media, deep state, and all forms of soft power via NGO's and pop culture. So, there is a vast collusion of all those forces. Other groups don't control so much. So, Mormons might be well-represented in some areas but not so much in others. Hindus may be big in Silicon Valley but not so much in other areas like Hollywood and Las Vegas.

    In contrast, Jews are heavily represented in ALL forms of elite institutions and industries, and that makes a huge difference. It's the coordination of all those powers that led to current wars.

    Consider the Iraq War. Suppose media were controlled by gentiles than Jews. Then, the neocon war plans might have been opposed. But it was Jewish state power in collusion with Jewish media power. That did the trick. Also, Jewish finance power bought up so many politicians.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Zumbuddi says:
    @Giuseppe
    Sure, cultural reasons, people wanted to emulate the better classes where the practice started and to dissociate themselves from the despised immigrants and hicks.

    Hygiene just catalyzed a large number of circumcisions with the Victorian germophobia and fear of tuberculosis after Koch's postulates. After critical mass was achieved, the practice began to take off . Hygiene is often invoked today but the real reasons remain cultural.

    Mom, apple pie and circumcision.

    Circumcision was an established practice before the Irish were created

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Rurik says:

    While agreeing with Giraldi on the malady, let us discuss the remedy. Would keeping Jews out of foreign policy making actually help? Did the US keep out of wars before the Rise of Jews in late 1960s? The Jews weren’t specially prominent before that time, and certainly weren’t overrepresented in the establishment.

    well Mr. Shamir, as has already been pointed out, it was due to Jewish intrigue that dragged the US into the first World War (and second ; ).

    I don’t need to point out the Balfour Declaration or Benjamin Freedman’s speech. I’m just surprised you’d neglect that part of the story.

    Israel had been threatened by the US (in 1956) rather than assisted.

    Israel proper wasn’t threatened, just told to vacate the Sinai, which wasn’t theirs to occupy. Not that Palestine was either, but that’s a different story.

    In all these campaigns, the US Jews were actually for peace and against war.

    I remember reading somewhere that Jews were against the Vietnam war because it was (putatively) a war against communism, and communism was a Jewish invention and cherished institution. Compare the anti-war zealotry of the 1960s Jews with the sanguine glorification of Hollywood’s Jews for the wars in the Middle East, and the contradiction could not be more stark.

    here’s just a few of the movies glorifying the war crimes in Iraq (not including the movies made about America’s other wars to benefit Israel)

    http://www.famousfix.com/list/iraq-war-films

    I see they even made one about “Saving Jessica Lynch’, how that for a howler?

    Less Jewish-influenced America would rather invade Venezuela than Iraq or Iran. But is it so wonderful?

    I don’t buy the presumption that Americans demand wars. The American people voted against every war we’ve been forced to fight. We always vote against the wars. It’s true that the MIC will try to find a pretext, but just look at the way Americans, (and Brits) reacted to more war in Syria. There was a massive insurrection, and the whores in Parliament and congress were forced to say nay.

    Where is the grass roots agitation for war with N. Korea, if the American people are so congenitally belligerent?

    Karl Marx wrote that “in North America, the practical domination of Judaism over the Christian world has achieved as its unambiguous and normal expression”.

    I’ve heard the same kinds of things said about Weimar Germany. I see the influence as ‘normal’ and ‘practical’ as a dog must consider ticks normal and practical.

    The Jews are prominent now because America is custom-built for Jews to fit and suit them, he said.

    he has the cart before the horse.

    it suits them because they are prominent, not the other way around. The America of the 19th and 20th century or the post war America of the 1950s and early 60s was an America that suited the Gentiles, and under which the Jews (and the blacks) bristled. But soon the Jews were able to use their ill-gotten lucre, looted from America’s Treasury via the Fed, to create the kind of America that suited the Jews. Which is what we see today, with the cultural things happening and all the diversity and multi-whatever. It suits the Jews (and homosexuals and assorted minorities) but hardly the white Gentiles, who voted for Trump because they feel absolutely alienated in what was formerly their home.

    Stop subscribing to Jewish success model, and the Jews won’t be able to influence the Senate.

    oh come now Mr. Shamir, you’re being disingenuous. The power of the Jew rest entirely on financial chicanery and ownership of the Fed. The corruption comes from the top down, with a Jewish media that corrupts everything it touches. They’ve used the counterfeiting machine to buy up every institution that money can buy, and that’s our courts and universities and increasingly everything else. Like I said, it’s exactly like Weimar Germany, and for the exact same reasons.

    And why to stop there? The super-rich non-Jews are as Jewish as any Jew. They share the same aspirations.

    but that’s where you’re mistaken.

    The wealthy Gentiles might be corrupt and greedy and amoral, but they’re not full to the brim with racial, tribal hatreds that go back centuries. The “Jews’ have a massive chip on their shoulder, and they want revenge. That’s why their inordinate power is catastrophic, because they use it for evil, rather than just material advantage, like the Gentiles do.

    the solution is simply to end the Fed, and create a level playing field. But as long as the Fed remains in Jewish hands, and as long as the Federal Reserve Note is the world’s reserve currency, then the Jewish id (with all its rancor and pathologies) will grind this planet into a hate-fest of death and misery and blood in the streets.

    I agree with you that preventing that would be beneficial to Jew and Gentile alike, but there’s only one way to get there, and there’s no way out but through the Fed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  96. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    I was totally with your generally very intelligent comment up until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade

    What can I do about it? LOL. Do I control mass colonization of EU by masses of black Africans? Do I control pop culture or sports industry? Do I control the media that promote interracism? Do I control the Narrative that makes blacks both sacred-spiritual and studly-sensual in 'Western' culture?

    I have no power over that. I just comment on what I see in the streets and in the media. And that stuff is inescapable. It is all over the place.

    Just connect the dots of demographics and media and white attitudes. You will see that I'm right when I say ACOWW is the greatest threat to whites. Other non-white races may outnumber whites, but they don't nullify white manhood. Even in China or India or Mexico, a lone white man is seen as a Man, an Hombre by the locals. But even when there is one black guy and 10 white guys, black guy is seen as the alpha while whites are cucked.

    This is real.

    This all comes from a loss of dignity but we have to take ownership for that…pornography and the cuckery that it breeds is consumed by a whole of white men. There is definitely perversion within our own ranks and I have seen it myself…I have mostly seen white men who get off on watching other men fucking their wives or consuming black on blonde style pornography. The powers that be want you to lose your religion but never forget that they aren’t losing theirs. Its true that things are not what they used to be but we also are nothing like our grandfathers and men of those older eras. I rarely see any self reflection in posts from people who want to blame others for their issues….in this sense, a lot of white men are not too different from the black men they criticize for always playing the victim card.
    I am not aiming that last statement at you in particular cuz most of your original post was on point, but honor, dignity and chivalry are not valued by mass numbers of white men who have allowed indecency to pervert them. I

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Look at Germany and Sweden. Even with the current mess, the majority STILL vote for the establishment politicians and still drink the Kool Aid of globalism and 'inclusion'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    Oh really?

    Below is from: 'The Spirit Of Militarism', by Zionist Jew Nahum Goldmann
    Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress

    "The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone."
     

    Goldmann hat über deutscher Nationalismus geredet, aber du hast das schon gekannt.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    I rarely see any self reflection in posts from people who want to blame others for their issues….in this sense, a lot of white men are not too different from the black men they criticize for always playing the victim card.
     
    Agree, of course.
    , @Wally
    No he wasn't and you know it, Zionist.

    "Some stories are true that never happened."
    - Elie Wiesel
     
    Still owning you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. @peterAUS
    You do make sense, of course.

    You'll forgive me for being a little unbelieving, though.

    Based on known history of humankind in general and US history in particular I just can't buy that should we get rid of American Jews the imperial wars would just stop.
    Sorry, I am not buying that for a second.

    Should American Jews go as a power group another power group would feel that vacuum.
    At the moment the most likely is the old guard.....the Anglo group.

    And looking at the past work of that group one has to be delusional to believe all would be fine and dandy.

    One could almost get a feeling that blaming Jewish American group for the ills of The Empire is.......nice play...........
    Smart....smooth.........play..........

    Almost as being used by one group against another.
    And neither gives a shit about us.
    Little guys.

    Just a feeling, mind you.

    Based on known history of humankind in general and US history in particular I just can’t buy that should we get rid of American Jews the imperial wars would just stop.
    Sorry, I am not buying that for a second.

    I never said it would end. I said US foreign policy wouldn’t be so narrow and petty. Also, it would be more difficult for US to wage wars. Not impossible. Just more difficult.

    Just think. Most ethnic groups in the US aren’t interested in world affairs. Greek-Americans may be upset over Cyprus, but I can’t see them controlling US policy to wage war on Turkey. Polish-Americans are pissed about Russia and Germany, but I don’t see them controlling US foreign policy to have another war in Europe. Chinese Americans may feel some feeling for mother country, but Chinese don’t have the personality to become pushy leaders of US power. Blacks are into themselves and don’t care about foreign affairs. Mexicans are for Mexico and care nothing for the rest of the world.

    The only people who might push for more warmongering are Anglo-Americans with their long history of imperialism. But, without Jewish alliance, it would be much more difficult. At least with alliance with Jews, the war can be sold as ‘protecting democratic Israel and preventing another hitler’. But without Jews, White Anglo Imperialism would be much more difficult to sell as ‘white power’ and ‘white privilege’ are denounced endlessly as ‘racist’.

    Also, Jewish Power isn’t just in government. It is in finance, academia, thinktanks, media, deep state, and all forms of soft power via NGO’s and pop culture. So, there is a vast collusion of all those forces. Other groups don’t control so much. So, Mormons might be well-represented in some areas but not so much in others. Hindus may be big in Silicon Valley but not so much in other areas like Hollywood and Las Vegas.

    In contrast, Jews are heavily represented in ALL forms of elite institutions and industries, and that makes a huge difference. It’s the coordination of all those powers that led to current wars.

    Consider the Iraq War. Suppose media were controlled by gentiles than Jews. Then, the neocon war plans might have been opposed. But it was Jewish state power in collusion with Jewish media power. That did the trick. Also, Jewish finance power bought up so many politicians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    There is only ONE rule in human interactions.
    One only.

    You do not know the OTHER until they have power over you.

    So, I do not buy for a nanosecond that all those groups you mentioned wouldn't do exactly what you say they wouldn't, in instant they have THAT power.

    As for this:


    At least with alliance with Jews, the war can be sold as ‘protecting democratic Israel and preventing another hitler’.
     
    "Preventing another Hitler" was/is/will be exactly why The Holocaust was marketed so hard.
    Actually, one of reasons.
    Another, equally important, was/is/will be import of cheap and docile workforce.

    Bombing of Yugoslavia 1999 was not about Israel, Middle East and what not.

    It's been The Game since Germany lost the war.

    It was created by Anglos, and heavily used by them till fall of Communism.
    But The Game, by its very nature, created a perfect environment for other power group to get on top.
    And they did.

    So, its fine to blame Jews for being better in playing the game your team invented and was playing for some time.
    But, it wouldn't hurt to start with a bit of reflection and introspection first.

    The world is watching and having fun.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    NOW we are talking.
    So, all that was O.K. before because a common person in US had benefits he/she wanted.
    But, NOW, he/she doesn’t share those benefits. So, it’s not O.K.
    So, if benefits were shared now, that (imperialism, war etc…) would be O.K. again.

    No, you misunderstand me. I think we should oppose ALL forms of imperialism today. And I mean all forms.

    But we can't judge the historical past by principles and values that came later. There was a time when imperialism was the norm among all great and even minor powers. And it was true that in those days, imperialism was a Shared Project that benefited or glorified everyone among the winners. So, it had an element of democracy.

    But even that element is gone from today's imperialism that benefits only the globalist elites.

    Of course, we should oppose and condemn any kind of imperialism today.

    But globalists are pushing for US-dominant military interventions against nations hated by Israel and for massive demographic imperialism that will permanently change the character of nations. This demographic imperialism benefits Jewish elites(as they get to play divide and rule) and the masses of third world invaders(who mooch off and replace whites). Replacist Imperialism must go.

    We have been pimping our own women out way before black culture did it, when we pulled women out of the household in the name of their liberty to serve capitalism, this itself is a form of pimping. When we sell everything from beer to a car using a woman’s sexuality, is this not a form of pimping? How about how white culture has also been detrimental to black people, do you know how many black women think its hip to be a stripper now? Strip clubs, pornography and all that shit came from us first but now it is also running rampant in the black culture….its fickle minded to blame this on others when our culture has fallen apart with us enjoying the ride and getting off on it…we sold out our happiness for pleasure and of course there are parasites who profit off this..but its our own weakness that sets the stage for this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. @anon
    This all comes from a loss of dignity but we have to take ownership for that...pornography and the cuckery that it breeds is consumed by a whole of white men. There is definitely perversion within our own ranks and I have seen it myself...I have mostly seen white men who get off on watching other men fucking their wives or consuming black on blonde style pornography. The powers that be want you to lose your religion but never forget that they aren't losing theirs. Its true that things are not what they used to be but we also are nothing like our grandfathers and men of those older eras. I rarely see any self reflection in posts from people who want to blame others for their issues....in this sense, a lot of white men are not too different from the black men they criticize for always playing the victim card.
    I am not aiming that last statement at you in particular cuz most of your original post was on point, but honor, dignity and chivalry are not valued by mass numbers of white men who have allowed indecency to pervert them. I

    Look at Germany and Sweden. Even with the current mess, the majority STILL vote for the establishment politicians and still drink the Kool Aid of globalism and ‘inclusion’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    Look at Germany . . . the majority STILL vote for the establishment politicians and still drink the Kool Aid of globalism and ‘inclusion
     
    ’.

    Americans drink the Kool Aid.

    Germany was not returned to Germans, it was Americanized.

    If Americans drink the Kool Aid, why wouldn't you expect Germerica to sip from the same cup?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. anon says: • Disclaimer

    If we were so powerless as to let others take control of our nation against our will then we aren’t as superior as we originally thought we were or maybe just maybe, we ourselves sold out to a bag of goodies that are now biting us in the ass…either way, taking responsibility for your current condition is the only prereq for change.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANONYMOUS

    or maybe just maybe, we ourselves sold out to a bag of goodies that are now biting us in the ass…
     
    Matthew, ch 4
    Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. The tempter came to him and said, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.”

    Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’ ”

    Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written:

    “‘He will command his angels concerning you,
    and they will lift you up in their hands,
    so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’ ”
    Jesus answered him, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’ ”

    Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. “All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.”

    Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’ ”

    Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him.


    either way, taking responsibility for your current condition is the only prereq for change.
     
    , @peterAUS
    Precisely.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. anon says: • Disclaimer

    what the fuck do we celebrate as manhood and heroism these days, its all twisted. Indecency is entertainment to us and we consume it happily. The entertainers and athletes who excel in this system are most times worse off than us even though materially they prosper. Our current culture doesn’t reward decency and morality and like in the examples of black people, this is having major consequences for them as well where black boys all want to emulate womanizers, rappers and athletes because we place the worst examples of their culture on a pedestal, granted Jews do the placing often times but who the fuck is doing the consuming. Taking responsibility for ourselves is more a sign of manhood then reminiscing about a time when we had it good and how all these others placed us in the position that we are in.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. wayfarer says:
    @Grandpa Charlie
    This illustrates how entirely minimalist Giraldi is in his discussion that is tangential to the question as to whether or not there are Zionist neocons working within the govt. of the USA who are actually guilty of treason to some degree or another.

    Giraldi does not even broach 9-11 truth ... he is very careful, circumspect and minimalist in everything he writes, perhaps because he is dogged by the CIA or perhaps because he anticipates being called to testify before a grand jury some day soon, not as a defendant but as an expert witness. Or maybe it's just that he has too much respect for the truth to engage in hyperbole.

    Philip Grialdi disseminates some truth, calls a spade-a-spade, and he’s issued a pink slip.

    This speaks volumes.

    Truth has always drawn fire. Recently it’s been under heavy fire, sustaining severe wounds.

    But fortunately according to Buddha, “Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.”

    So we can expect truth to eventually make a full recovery.

    Of course, this recovery can be facilitated by individuals willing to support the truth.

    Read More
    • Agree: Grandpa Charlie
    • Replies: @anonYMOUS
    Iran should not be on that map.
    It's not Arab
    , @bjondo
    why do they need to be refugees?
    they have a land and homes.
    jew has whole world plus hell.
    jew get lost.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Holy shit, the author actually said “un-wealth”

    I love Unz Review so fucking much. The commenters on the other hand are a mixed bag, but I can see these comments attracting (((paid shills))), to perform their usual D&C, and other typical tricks. In fact, after the Plame affair, Unz Review is going to be under attack the way reddit and 8chan are currently.

    In b4 ‘muh antisemitism’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  105. ANONYMOUS says: • Disclaimer
    @anon
    If we were so powerless as to let others take control of our nation against our will then we aren't as superior as we originally thought we were or maybe just maybe, we ourselves sold out to a bag of goodies that are now biting us in the ass...either way, taking responsibility for your current condition is the only prereq for change.

    or maybe just maybe, we ourselves sold out to a bag of goodies that are now biting us in the ass…

    Matthew, ch 4
    Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. The tempter came to him and said, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.”

    Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’ ”

    Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written:

    “‘He will command his angels concerning you,
    and they will lift you up in their hands,
    so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’ ”
    Jesus answered him, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’ ”

    Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. “All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.”

    Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’ ”

    Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him.

    either way, taking responsibility for your current condition is the only prereq for change.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. wayfarer says:

    Correction:

    “Philip Giraldi disseminates some truth, …”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  107. anonYMOUS says: • Disclaimer
    @wayfarer
    Philip Grialdi disseminates some truth, calls a spade-a-spade, and he's issued a pink slip.

    This speaks volumes.

    Truth has always drawn fire. Recently it's been under heavy fire, sustaining severe wounds.

    But fortunately according to Buddha, “Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.”

    So we can expect truth to eventually make a full recovery.

    Of course, this recovery can be facilitated by individuals willing to support the truth.

    http://www.pray4zion.org/images/graphics/arabrefugeesinarablands.png

    Iran should not be on that map.
    It’s not Arab

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. peterAUS says:
    @Anon
    Goldmann hat über deutscher Nationalismus geredet, aber du hast das schon gekannt.

    I rarely see any self reflection in posts from people who want to blame others for their issues….in this sense, a lot of white men are not too different from the black men they criticize for always playing the victim card.

    Agree, of course.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. peterAUS says:
    @anon
    If we were so powerless as to let others take control of our nation against our will then we aren't as superior as we originally thought we were or maybe just maybe, we ourselves sold out to a bag of goodies that are now biting us in the ass...either way, taking responsibility for your current condition is the only prereq for change.

    Precisely.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. Old Jew says:

    Mr, Shamir,

    Good article.

    A much needed rebuke to Giraldi and his faithful team of

    “Bey Zhidov, Spasy Rossyiu”.

    Reminds me of “A modest Proposal”

    Bolshoe Spasibo!

    sf

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  111. peterAUS says:
    @Priss Factor
    Based on known history of humankind in general and US history in particular I just can’t buy that should we get rid of American Jews the imperial wars would just stop.
    Sorry, I am not buying that for a second.

    I never said it would end. I said US foreign policy wouldn't be so narrow and petty. Also, it would be more difficult for US to wage wars. Not impossible. Just more difficult.

    Just think. Most ethnic groups in the US aren't interested in world affairs. Greek-Americans may be upset over Cyprus, but I can't see them controlling US policy to wage war on Turkey. Polish-Americans are pissed about Russia and Germany, but I don't see them controlling US foreign policy to have another war in Europe. Chinese Americans may feel some feeling for mother country, but Chinese don't have the personality to become pushy leaders of US power. Blacks are into themselves and don't care about foreign affairs. Mexicans are for Mexico and care nothing for the rest of the world.

    The only people who might push for more warmongering are Anglo-Americans with their long history of imperialism. But, without Jewish alliance, it would be much more difficult. At least with alliance with Jews, the war can be sold as 'protecting democratic Israel and preventing another hitler'. But without Jews, White Anglo Imperialism would be much more difficult to sell as 'white power' and 'white privilege' are denounced endlessly as 'racist'.

    Also, Jewish Power isn't just in government. It is in finance, academia, thinktanks, media, deep state, and all forms of soft power via NGO's and pop culture. So, there is a vast collusion of all those forces. Other groups don't control so much. So, Mormons might be well-represented in some areas but not so much in others. Hindus may be big in Silicon Valley but not so much in other areas like Hollywood and Las Vegas.

    In contrast, Jews are heavily represented in ALL forms of elite institutions and industries, and that makes a huge difference. It's the coordination of all those powers that led to current wars.

    Consider the Iraq War. Suppose media were controlled by gentiles than Jews. Then, the neocon war plans might have been opposed. But it was Jewish state power in collusion with Jewish media power. That did the trick. Also, Jewish finance power bought up so many politicians.

    There is only ONE rule in human interactions.
    One only.

    You do not know the OTHER until they have power over you.

    So, I do not buy for a nanosecond that all those groups you mentioned wouldn’t do exactly what you say they wouldn’t, in instant they have THAT power.

    As for this:

    At least with alliance with Jews, the war can be sold as ‘protecting democratic Israel and preventing another hitler’.

    “Preventing another Hitler” was/is/will be exactly why The Holocaust was marketed so hard.
    Actually, one of reasons.
    Another, equally important, was/is/will be import of cheap and docile workforce.

    Bombing of Yugoslavia 1999 was not about Israel, Middle East and what not.

    It’s been The Game since Germany lost the war.

    It was created by Anglos, and heavily used by them till fall of Communism.
    But The Game, by its very nature, created a perfect environment for other power group to get on top.
    And they did.

    So, its fine to blame Jews for being better in playing the game your team invented and was playing for some time.
    But, it wouldn’t hurt to start with a bit of reflection and introspection first.

    The world is watching and having fun.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    Look at Germany and Sweden. Even with the current mess, the majority STILL vote for the establishment politicians and still drink the Kool Aid of globalism and 'inclusion'.

    Look at Germany . . . the majority STILL vote for the establishment politicians and still drink the Kool Aid of globalism and ‘inclusion

    ’.

    Americans drink the Kool Aid.

    Germany was not returned to Germans, it was Americanized.

    If Americans drink the Kool Aid, why wouldn’t you expect Germerica to sip from the same cup?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. They have been very successful in bombing the American surveillance ship in 1967 and corrupting the political apparatus of this country ever since! Many thanks to Mr Giraldi to document the criminals behind all that!

    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  114. Karl says:
    @longfisher
    I don't necessarily agree with much of the Jew-bashing that goes on here, although I've done my fair share about the issue that they don't serve in the American armed forces in percentages commensurate to their percent of the population and, in particular, don't serve in the more dangerous roles in combat arms in numbers equivalent to their numbers in the U.S. population.

    But I'm delighted to no end that there's a place on the Internet in which people can actually say what they might think about ethnicity and religion, in particularly about the Jews, without censorship.

    I think grievances are best expressed openly so that solutions can be openly discussed and sometimes found rather than suppressed where they simply fester.

    64 longfisher > and, in particular, don’t serve in the more dangerous roles in combat arms in numbers equivalent to their numbers in the U.S. population

    so, put in quotas to make sure that African-Americans get more spots at the US National Laboratories and in the analytic units and in the Innovation units.

    There…. your problems are solved!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. Dr. X says:

    The Jews are prominent now because America is custom-built for Jews to fit and suit them…

    This is what should be corrected, and then the Jewish scribes, these Krauthammers will be out of business of inciting wars. Stop subscribing to Jewish success model, and the Jews won’t be able to influence the Senate. Make the US Christian as Christ taught, share labour and wealth, aspire to God instead of Mammon, make the first last and the last first, love thy neighbour and the problem will be solved.

    That’s a really brilliant observation, and it contains much to agree with.

    However, it also begs one to bring up the question of the role of the Jews in undermining traditional Christianity in the U.S. (e.g., Engel v. Vitale, Roth v. U.S., Lee v. Weisman, the Frankfurt schoolers, etc.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    The “beginning of the end” of Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants. Both Jews and Protestants were "advisors" and helped formulate Vatican II policy...most people are unaware of the influence that "outsiders" had on the faith...
    Much Catholic ritual was discarded, as well as the idea that responsibility for Jesus Christ's crucifixion and death was at the hands of the Jews now being absolved of their participation and actions, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their "dirty work" for them...
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Cardinal Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back" against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize celebration of pre-Vatican II principles.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. Wally says:
    @Anon
    Goldmann hat über deutscher Nationalismus geredet, aber du hast das schon gekannt.

    No he wasn’t and you know it, Zionist.

    “Some stories are true that never happened.”
    - Elie Wiesel

    Still owning you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. @Aren Haich
    Pat Buchanan's remark that Capitol is the Israeli occupied territory has apparently been true for quite some time.
    One may reasonably hope that now, with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump stirring things up and being the two most popular personalities in the American politics, the Israeli lobbies will meet substantial resistance in getting their usual choices elected to the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2018.
    Alabama Primary result today can be a decisive trendsetter.

    I recall my delight when Eric Cantor the staunch, powerful Israeli stooge in the Senate was thrown out of office Boom! In the most public way imaginable. “It’s still very vivid, indelibly etched,” he was beaten by a little known David Brat in the primaries. Cantor had outspent him, outpolled him, and had every reason to believe that he was headed for an eighth term. Cantor was the first sitting House majority leader in history to lose his congressional seat, a defeat so unexpected that it shocked the unshockable political establishment, which called it one of the greatest political upsets of modern times. It can be done. Go people!! #MAGA

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Wally says: • Website
    @longfisher
    I don't necessarily agree with much of the Jew-bashing that goes on here, although I've done my fair share about the issue that they don't serve in the American armed forces in percentages commensurate to their percent of the population and, in particular, don't serve in the more dangerous roles in combat arms in numbers equivalent to their numbers in the U.S. population.

    But I'm delighted to no end that there's a place on the Internet in which people can actually say what they might think about ethnicity and religion, in particularly about the Jews, without censorship.

    I think grievances are best expressed openly so that solutions can be openly discussed and sometimes found rather than suppressed where they simply fester.

    Yet Jews demanded and got free speech about the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ banned in 16 European counties & of course, “that shitty little country”.

    Jews demand punishment for Thought Crimes.

    The “Holocau$t Industry” in court:

    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, … but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    “Some stories are true that never happened.”
    - Elie Wiesel

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. @Aren Haich
    Pat Buchanan's remark that Capitol is the Israeli occupied territory has apparently been true for quite some time.
    One may reasonably hope that now, with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump stirring things up and being the two most popular personalities in the American politics, the Israeli lobbies will meet substantial resistance in getting their usual choices elected to the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2018.
    Alabama Primary result today can be a decisive trendsetter.

    Recall the staunch Israeli stooge Eric Cantor’s defeat ?

    The next day, the National Journal’s Ron Fournier penned a warning with this headline:
    “Elites Beware: Eric Cantor’s Defeat May Signal a Populist Revolution.”

    Voters believed: Time to blow it up and start over.

    Go people! You can do it! #MAGA.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Wally says:
    @anon
    I was totally with your generally very intelligent comment up until you went on your weird big donged Africans will take all the white women tirade, you need to deal with that. White men's contempt for a particular people make those people more of a curiousity to their womenfolk as in if you try to hide a loaf of bread from someone they are going to want it more. Its that and also the glamorization of athletes in general to hero status. Not to mention, if you hate a people because of your own insecurities, your women know your truth. Also, You must not know a lot of black men to realize how human and insecure they also are, they have the same problems with women that any other men would have and they also pay a major price for the myopic promotion of urban black culture in America and Europe.

    But everything else you said is serious food for thought and very enlightening and well said.

    per the CDC:

    Blacks and Gays Lead STD Rates

    http://www.catholicleague.org/blacks-and-gays-lead-with-std-rates/

    excerpt:
    “After decades of the most progressive sex education programs in our nation’s history, and the most massive distribution of free condoms ever undertaken, never has the rate of sexually transmitted diseases been worse. The rates among blacks and homosexuals are astonishing.

    Blacks comprise roughly 13% of the U.S. population, yet they account for 55.4% of all gonorrhea cases and 50.6% of all syphilis cases. Even more disturbing are the rates for chlamydia and gonorrhea among blacks in the 0-4 age group: no racial or ethnic group comes close to them”

    STD rates hit another record high, with California near the top

    http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-ln-std-rates-20170926-story.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Wie würdest du kennen? Du kannst Deutsch nicht lesen. Du hast nie dies Buch gelesen, and du das kennst.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. Ethan says:
    @Paul Harrison
    [Choose a single Handle and stick with it, or use Anonymous/Anon. Otherwise, your comments will be trashed.]

    I have never found Jews particularly cheap or materialistic. Maybe as a Scot I have a warped perspective. Denied the chance at noble titles or churchly favor, money has been their only path to power and distinction.What I do see as a problem is the combination of extreme ability and extreme solidarity. Put that together with their adversarial relationship to the gentile world developed over the centuries and you have a recipe for harmful culture war. Producing sexy movies and violent rap, the war on Christmas, the attempt to limit free speech --- all are forms of aggression or payback for aggression, as I see it. To be sure, not all Jews or even most feel this emotion, but the ones that do work hard to promote it. According to Pew Research, 94% of self-identified Jews identify as pro-choice. The next highest group is mainline Protestants at 59%. Such a great disparity suggests to me that the issue is largely symbolic for them. I suspect you would find similar disparities on gun rights, attitudes to pornography, and religion in the public square. It's rare for Muslims or Hindus to complain about having to hear Christmas carols, but many Jews want to sick the Homeland Security SWAT Team on the school choir if a few syllables of Hark the Herald Angels are overheard. For that reason, I feel more threatened by the billions of Adelson, Bezos, Saban, Soros, and Singer than by Gates or Buffett, even though the latter are also quite liberal.

    Bezos isn’t Jewish. I can’t believe it’s 2017 and I’m actually reading this anti-semitic trash. Are the people here too blinded in their hatred of Jews to even realize they are repeating the centuries-old conspiracy theory that Jews control the world. If Jews controlled the world, you think Israel would be constantly surrounded by enemies, constantly dogged in the UN? It should be noted that the majority of Jewish senators voted against the Iraq war resolution. The majority of neo-cons are non-Jews and the majority of Jews are not neo-cons. But because you can draw a link to 1 or 2 Jews here or there, all of a sudden we can lay a blanket accusation against “Jews.” These views are absolutely disgusting and medieval. I can pick any political view, any single political view on Earth, and find a handful of Jews who support it (or Armenians, or Greeks, or Persian-Americans…), does that mean it’s fair to lump “The Jews,” into a political agenda? You people can try to intellectualize your anti-semitic trash all you want, but you’re only reenacting an ancient animus.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Debbie Menon
    The Source of America's Wars - Kristol Clear

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBCxYicxTow

    American politicians and media have fallen captive to the Zionist network. This is a lethal ailment that afflicts the US.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    I guess the communist Shamir has a gulag in mind….put ‘em all in jail…right. What an idiot. or Utopian…ugh, the worst thing for a communist.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  123. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    per the CDC:

    Blacks and Gays Lead STD Rates
    http://www.catholicleague.org/blacks-and-gays-lead-with-std-rates/
    excerpt:
    "After decades of the most progressive sex education programs in our nation’s history, and the most massive distribution of free condoms ever undertaken, never has the rate of sexually transmitted diseases been worse. The rates among blacks and homosexuals are astonishing.

    Blacks comprise roughly 13% of the U.S. population, yet they account for 55.4% of all gonorrhea cases and 50.6% of all syphilis cases. Even more disturbing are the rates for chlamydia and gonorrhea among blacks in the 0-4 age group: no racial or ethnic group comes close to them"

    STD rates hit another record high, with California near the top
    http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-ln-std-rates-20170926-story.html

    Wie würdest du kennen? Du kannst Deutsch nicht lesen. Du hast nie dies Buch gelesen, and du das kennst.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. bjondo says:
    @wayfarer
    Philip Grialdi disseminates some truth, calls a spade-a-spade, and he's issued a pink slip.

    This speaks volumes.

    Truth has always drawn fire. Recently it's been under heavy fire, sustaining severe wounds.

    But fortunately according to Buddha, “Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.”

    So we can expect truth to eventually make a full recovery.

    Of course, this recovery can be facilitated by individuals willing to support the truth.

    http://www.pray4zion.org/images/graphics/arabrefugeesinarablands.png

    why do they need to be refugees?
    they have a land and homes.
    jew has whole world plus hell.
    jew get lost.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. anarchyst says:
    @Dr. X

    The Jews are prominent now because America is custom-built for Jews to fit and suit them...

    This is what should be corrected, and then the Jewish scribes, these Krauthammers will be out of business of inciting wars. Stop subscribing to Jewish success model, and the Jews won’t be able to influence the Senate. Make the US Christian as Christ taught, share labour and wealth, aspire to God instead of Mammon, make the first last and the last first, love thy neighbour and the problem will be solved.
     
    That's a really brilliant observation, and it contains much to agree with.

    However, it also begs one to bring up the question of the role of the Jews in undermining traditional Christianity in the U.S. (e.g., Engel v. Vitale, Roth v. U.S., Lee v. Weisman, the Frankfurt schoolers, etc.)

    The “beginning of the end” of Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants. Both Jews and Protestants were “advisors” and helped formulate Vatican II policy…most people are unaware of the influence that “outsiders” had on the faith…
    Much Catholic ritual was discarded, as well as the idea that responsibility for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death was at the hands of the Jews now being absolved of their participation and actions, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their “dirty work” for them…
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Cardinal Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back” against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize celebration of pre-Vatican II principles.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. Miro23 says:
    @chris
    I appreciate the point you're making and as far as free speech is concerned, I certainly agree, it's just that the analysis of the example you gave is not quite complete.

    Along the lines of the point you're making, people may or may not resent the Amish for refusing military service, but how would most people feel if the Amish, while refusing to serve in the military themselves, would be manning many of the DC think tanks and would be urging the rest of us constantly toward different wars?

    Good point. The Amish live by their own traditions in a society apart and that’s fine.

    They don’t aim to gain political power over the majority, determine US foreign policy, head the FED and Treasury and control the media.

    It’s the exploitative POLITICAL interference of a 2% Jewish minority in the affairs of the Gentile 98% majority that’s the root of the problem in US Facade Democracy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. @AaronB
    Great article, Shamir.

    And the Jews themselves merely represent a principle older than them, and that will outlast them. Power.

    Any group that focus on power, will be "Jewish", just as the Romans were Jewish, the Athenian were Jewish, the English were Jewish.

    We are not fighting against flesh and blood, but against a Spirit. Jews merely manifest this spirit in our times.

    Rid of the world of flesh and blood Jews, and the Spirit will find another incarnation in a new people.

    For centuries, this Spirit manifested in the most Christian nations of Western Europe, despite Christianity being opposed to power.

    A creed, a theology, a religion is helpless against this Spirit - a person animated by this Spirit can turn any creed into its opposite, without shame.

    Focusing on "forms", external husks, at the expense of the Spirit does not work - Christianity had the "form" of a power-denying creed, but gradually it's Spirit came to mean the opposite of what it's words plainly say, as it still does for many on the alt-right today.

    Jews are the external husks of an animating Spirit - focusing on Jews will solve nothing, as our fight is against powers and principalities and not flesh and blood.

    Focusing on “forms”, external husks, at the expense of the Spirit does not work – Christianity had the “form” of a power-denying creed, but gradually it’s Spirit came to mean the opposite of what it’s words plainly say…

    Agree.

    For that reason, there is no cure, or at least there is no cure that any man can understand or even begin to implement.

    As for the “Jews”, they could do very little without plenty of goyim willing to play their game. Everyone should let that sink in for a moment. Rather than changing them, we may need to think about changing ourselves, but that’s not likely any time soon, if history is any guide.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    As for the “Jews”, they could do very little without plenty of goyim willing to play their game
     
    too true

    I have far more contempt for the traitorous scum gushing their fealty to this impertinent Jew than I have for the Jew himself

    http://sheffield.indymedia.org.uk/images/2011/06/480306.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. @Stan d Mute

    Making all public elections in the USA public funded only, breaking the laws is a criminal offense with minimum 10 years inprisonment. Limit the Congressmen to two terms and their terms end at the same time. These two actions is way more simpler and effective to get rid of the special interest groups controlling the Congress and the Administration.
     
    But nowhere near far enough..

    The Founders had it right. Only property owners could vote, because the essence of freedom is private property. They never envisioned our insanity however and this must be corrected. Voting must be predicated on having skin in the game, but also (more importantly) predicated on NOT being a beneficiary of government transfer payments or rent-seeking. A simple test:

    If you derive more income from government than you contribute in taxes, you have NO vote. This automatically excludes those on welfare as well as ALL government employees. The abject stupidity of allowing government employees to vote for (their own) higher wages and continued growth of government boggles the mind. Similarly, government contractors such as Lockheed, Boeing, etc can easily be checked to find if they are paid more by government than they contribute in taxes. If they’re funded by government they ARE government and their employees get no vote in how REAL taxpayers’ money is spent.

    The charade that any government employee is a “taxpayer” is so obviously complete bullshit, I have to wonder that anyone could conclude otherwise. They are ALL tax-eaters and ONLY the real taxpayers should have any say in how their confiscated labor and capital are spent.

    If you derive more income from government than you contribute in taxes, you have NO vote.

    I would love to see that, and also to extend the NO vote to anyone who receives a penny or more from the government including those who work for companies who receive anything from the government. Talk about a conflict of interest!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Paul C. says:
    @DESERT FOX
    The Zionists have controlled America completely since 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the IRS both of which were sponsored by the Zionist bankers to enable the U.S. to be forced into wars which we taxpayers would be forced into debt and made slaves of the Zionist banking cartel.

    We are not a free country, we are slaves on the Zionist plantation aka Israels colony, and that is the reason we are in perpetual wars for the profit of the Zionists banking cartel, and that is the fact of the matter.

    Well said. It makes you wonder about all the economics professors across the country. They haven’t figured it out? Amazing. How is it possible that ALL countries are bankrupt and in debt? They’ve all relinquished the right to manage their own money supply to a private banking cabal of zionist (luciferian) bankers (i.e. the Fed, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, etc…). The world is effectively enslaved. Our birth certificate is a bond, pledging us as human collateral for the US debt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. Which ever way influence shakes out, I think it’s better the US not get into a regional war with Iran.

    First, that’s a very bad idea.
    Second, it is extremely difficult to explain how doing so would serve US interests.

    But:

    Most importantly: there is a high, high, high, high, high, high likelihood … this enterprise, like almost all major wars, will in some way, go very, very badly.

    And there can be little doubting that when it does go badly – the optics are going to look bad, and even if unjustified, that’s not going to be enough to stop the ramifications of how bad the optics are going to look.

    It’s war and shooting and killing … good idea to act like people – lots of people – including people you care about: Iranians, Americans, Israelis, etc, etc, etc … are going to get hurt, and get killed.

    We don’t need that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  131. utu says:

    Basically Mr. Shamir says that Americans first must atone for Native Americans genocide, reexamine Mexican war and return Texas and California to Mexico and apologize for Spanish-American war. And only then they can start questioning the role of Jews in American wars and in the meantime at best they can hope that the questioning will be done by Jews like Mr. Shamir who have the exclusive license for it. It is interesting because this is the same line of argument I hear from Israeli’s when the treatment of Palestinians is questioned.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Could be.

    Or, he's just saying something as:
    “Whoever is without sin among you, let him be the first to cast a stone at her.”
    John 8:7.

    BTW, you left Hawaii out of the list.

    How about:
    American Anglo-Saxons first must acknowledge Native Americans genocide, acknowledge Mexican war, annexation of Hawaii and acknowledge Spanish-American war (Philippines in particular)
    And then they can start questioning the role of Jews in American wars.

    As for the rest of ethnic groups composing "Americans" let's not go there.
    Germans, Irish, East Europeans...and hell no African-Americans and Asians.
    As for South Americans.....whoah......again, let's just not go there.

    Just a thought.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. utu says:
    @Giuseppe
    Sure, cultural reasons, people wanted to emulate the better classes where the practice started and to dissociate themselves from the despised immigrants and hicks.

    Hygiene just catalyzed a large number of circumcisions with the Victorian germophobia and fear of tuberculosis after Koch's postulates. After critical mass was achieved, the practice began to take off . Hygiene is often invoked today but the real reasons remain cultural.

    Mom, apple pie and circumcision.

    Circumcision was promoted by Jews. There was no cultural reason for Christians to perform it. However Jews saw it that their mimicry would be more successful among circumcised Christians. No “drop-you-pants-test.”

    There are known case sof Jewish doctors boasting of how many circumcisions they performed during the WWII on dumb unsuspecting GI’s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. peterAUS says:
    @utu
    Basically Mr. Shamir says that Americans first must atone for Native Americans genocide, reexamine Mexican war and return Texas and California to Mexico and apologize for Spanish-American war. And only then they can start questioning the role of Jews in American wars and in the meantime at best they can hope that the questioning will be done by Jews like Mr. Shamir who have the exclusive license for it. It is interesting because this is the same line of argument I hear from Israeli's when the treatment of Palestinians is questioned.

    Could be.

    Or, he’s just saying something as:
    “Whoever is without sin among you, let him be the first to cast a stone at her.”
    John 8:7.

    BTW, you left Hawaii out of the list.

    How about:
    American Anglo-Saxons first must acknowledge Native Americans genocide, acknowledge Mexican war, annexation of Hawaii and acknowledge Spanish-American war (Philippines in particular)
    And then they can start questioning the role of Jews in American wars.

    As for the rest of ethnic groups composing “Americans” let’s not go there.
    Germans, Irish, East Europeans…and hell no African-Americans and Asians.
    As for South Americans…..whoah……again, let’s just not go there.

    Just a thought.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. @chris
    I appreciate the point you're making and as far as free speech is concerned, I certainly agree, it's just that the analysis of the example you gave is not quite complete.

    Along the lines of the point you're making, people may or may not resent the Amish for refusing military service, but how would most people feel if the Amish, while refusing to serve in the military themselves, would be manning many of the DC think tanks and would be urging the rest of us constantly toward different wars?

    Personally, I’ve got nothing against the Amish for refusing military service. They don’t warmonger, nor do they demand that others go and fight. That kind of man, I can respect.

    I despise the armchair commando, Israel-First chickenhawks who are always screaming for more war(s). These gutless wonders wouldn’t dream of wearing the uniform themselves, but they’re happy to see others serve as cannon fodder.

    Bastards.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Rurik says:
    @jacques sheete

    Focusing on “forms”, external husks, at the expense of the Spirit does not work – Christianity had the “form” of a power-denying creed, but gradually it’s Spirit came to mean the opposite of what it’s words plainly say...
     
    Agree.

    For that reason, there is no cure, or at least there is no cure that any man can understand or even begin to implement.

    As for the "Jews", they could do very little without plenty of goyim willing to play their game. Everyone should let that sink in for a moment. Rather than changing them, we may need to think about changing ourselves, but that's not likely any time soon, if history is any guide.

    As for the “Jews”, they could do very little without plenty of goyim willing to play their game

    too true

    I have far more contempt for the traitorous scum gushing their fealty to this impertinent Jew than I have for the Jew himself

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    That picture makes me soooo sick! What a bunch of sewer scum, yet people turn out by the millions to vote for such jackals. Ineffably disgusting.
    , @Sowhat
    Jacques, we could substitute NK heads on all in the audience and KJU'S head on BB and it would leave all with the same horrible impression.
    , @Cloak And Dagger
    This has to be the most contemptible demonstration of venal treachery that is the source of our national distress. Damn them all to hell.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. @MarkU

    "Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity"
     
    So a sweeping generalisation from a noted Nazi follower and antisemite is your counter-argument, seriously? I think it absurd to believe that Jews, or indeed any ethnic group can be held to have a 'core identity' in the way described, and then to further illustrate the point you write:-

    "The reason why ‘Italian’ is not a synonym for ‘mafia’ is because the mafia is not fundamental to Italian identity, and is viewed by the majority as criminal"
     
    You are apparently implying that usury is somehow fundamental to Jewish identity, so Jew would be synonymous with usurer. One more point:-

    "While their are WASP banksters, they are exempt from the levels of ethnic nepotism the Jews exhibit"
     
    It seems to be the case that all criminal enterprises have a tendency towards nepotism/ethnic nepotism (for fairly obvious reasons) It is difficult to believe that WASP banksters would be exempt.

    The question in my mind is, are you a genuine and honest antisemite or are you a banksters paid troll tasked with maintaining the conflation between international usury and Jewish ethnicity?

    I found the first paragraph much more interesting than the others.

    “Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity” — Lemurmaniac

    The first sentence would seem to be prospective, while the second is retrospective … from, I suppose, a present of maybe anno 1900. What I mean is that as of about, say, 1900, Heidigger considered Jews to be on an average more materialistic and cosmopolitan — what we might now think of as more prone toward ‘scientism’ or rationalism, denying any ‘spirit’, and more what we might now call ‘globalist’ — than gentiles. So, Jews were perhaps better positioned at the onset of the 20th Century than were gentiles.

    The second sentence, by contrast, is retrospective. That is, as of about 1900, looking back into the past, it may have been the case that Jews were given a monopoly on interest-bearing loans, at least the legal ones, although I have read some primary and secondary historical sources that document how Christian (Catholic) clergy were also profiting from such usurious business.

    Certainly, imho, a theory of usury has been incorporated into the concept (or myth?) of ‘modernity’ by way of popularization of the purely mathematical theory of compound interest. We can see this in the term, “magic of compound interest”. Out of this developed the theory of endless economic growth. It was a part of the popular culture propagated by ‘financial gurus’ for probably the last half of the 20th Century, that money is somehow like a tree, it just naturally grows and, like a tree, the rate of growth just naturally applies continuously to the tree – the new growth and the old growth alike — just like your bank account where the interest earned is “naturally” capitalized. Much the same equations applied in both situations … the Chapman-Richards equation and the compound interest equation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    “magic of compound interest”. Out of this developed the theory of endless economic growth

    There is no magic. And nothing is endless. Any system that has population growth require economic growth. Any system that has debt base money creation system will require population growth which leads to the requirement of economic growth.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. @Rurik

    As for the “Jews”, they could do very little without plenty of goyim willing to play their game
     
    too true

    I have far more contempt for the traitorous scum gushing their fealty to this impertinent Jew than I have for the Jew himself

    http://sheffield.indymedia.org.uk/images/2011/06/480306.jpg

    That picture makes me soooo sick! What a bunch of sewer scum, yet people turn out by the millions to vote for such jackals. Ineffably disgusting.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    What a bunch of sewer scum,
     
    yep, except that's not really fair to the assorted mastigophora and bacillus subtilis that dwells in sewers and septic tanks. Sewer scum never had an opportunity to be anything else, and even perform certain beneficial functions! Whereas the giddy and gushing, perfidious sycophants braying their fealty in the photograph should never be held anywhere near as esteemed or as comparatively noble as the kakkerlak.

    I thought about it, and I do sort of think the only fair denizen of creation that comports with direct similarities to a modern day congressman or woman, is the taenia solium- a tapeworm. That's the living thing that these congressmen and women most resemble. Both in character and manor and often appearance. Yet still, it seems unfair, as a tapeworm after all, has integrity, and betrays no one, least of all a sacred oath.


    yet people turn out by the millions to vote for such jackals
     
    and don't forget that all the Democrats standing there, in sniveling servility, were there as a direct repudiation of their putative leader and savior; Obama.

    Debbie Wassermann Schultz was exalted to the powerful position of the head of the DNC by her patron Obama

    http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Screen-Shot-2015-02-20-at-1.01.39-PM.png

    only to humiliate him by showing up to listen to Bibi berate Obama from the dais of his own capital building chamber in his own nation and in front of the members of his own gushing, furiously clapping party members.

    would even a kakkerlak do that?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Why the term ‘neo-con’? There’s nothing ‘con’ about any of it. It’s more of a form of fascism than anything resembling American style conservatism. What’s the big distinction between the invasions of places like Iraq and Mussolini’s invasions of Ethiopia and the Balkans? The ‘neos’ are just a fascist variant.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    agreed, it's not "con," as in conservativism, but neither is it "fascism.'

    It's Bolshevism.

    Mussolini's invasion of Ethiopia was an offense, but the Italians did not destroy Ethiopia they way Allies destroyed Iraq (and Germany, Syria, Libya . . .). That compulsion to destroy is not an Italian characteristic, it is Bolshevik.

    Italians left behind a greatly improved Libya
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_settlers_in_Libya
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Rurik says:
    @jacques sheete
    That picture makes me soooo sick! What a bunch of sewer scum, yet people turn out by the millions to vote for such jackals. Ineffably disgusting.

    What a bunch of sewer scum,

    yep, except that’s not really fair to the assorted mastigophora and bacillus subtilis that dwells in sewers and septic tanks. Sewer scum never had an opportunity to be anything else, and even perform certain beneficial functions! Whereas the giddy and gushing, perfidious sycophants braying their fealty in the photograph should never be held anywhere near as esteemed or as comparatively noble as the kakkerlak.

    I thought about it, and I do sort of think the only fair denizen of creation that comports with direct similarities to a modern day congressman or woman, is the taenia solium- a tapeworm. That’s the living thing that these congressmen and women most resemble. Both in character and manor and often appearance. Yet still, it seems unfair, as a tapeworm after all, has integrity, and betrays no one, least of all a sacred oath.

    yet people turn out by the millions to vote for such jackals

    and don’t forget that all the Democrats standing there, in sniveling servility, were there as a direct repudiation of their putative leader and savior; Obama.

    Debbie Wassermann Schultz was exalted to the powerful position of the head of the DNC by her patron Obama

    only to humiliate him by showing up to listen to Bibi berate Obama from the dais of his own capital building chamber in his own nation and in front of the members of his own gushing, furiously clapping party members.

    would even a kakkerlak do that?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. RobinG says:
    @Debbie Menon
    When did it all start?

    The answer to the question came from an Israeli diplomat who lectured to a class at Georgetown in the late 1980s, I am told by Professor Alan Sabrosky, who taught at the University, a course on Comparative Foreign Policy, among others, and had 3-4 diplomats from different countries in to the class each semester that at dinner with the Israeli diplomat and two students, he remarked during the conversation that the real turning point in Israel's approach to the US had come in the wake of the 1956 War, when President Eisenhower had ordered Israel, Britain and France to "cease & desist" and return home. He said the Israeli Embassy tried to get to Congress to reverse that decision, and found that in fact they had access to only two "minor Congressional offices" (his phrase, I remember it clearly says Prof. Alan Sabrosky). So, they set about crafting a network of PACs and other things to reverse that state of affairs. One of the students asked "how many Congressional offices they could access successfully now?" (that was in late 1980s please note)-- and with a satisfied smile, he remarked "Almost all of them." The students faces registered astonishment, so he quickly added words to the effect that "But of course, we don't control them, they still act in the best interests of the American people," but the students didn't believe him, and there you have it...."

    I suppose when so many people in comparable positions have a consensus on something (like "thou shalt not allow criticism of Israel"), you don't need a conspiracy. There are so many Jewish PACs, besides AIPAC. There exists a coordinating agency called "The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations," Their website (www.conferenceofpresidents.org/) is worth exploring (and AIPAC is just one of literally dozens of organizations under its umbrella).

    http://www.payvand.com/news/09/feb/1141.html

    This is OT everywhere, but while the Ziocons are pushing for wars abroad, who’s pushing the clashes at home? (The build-up has started to Nov. 4.)

    UNDERCOVER IN ANTIFA: Their Tactics and Media Support Exposed!

    ps – no more catbird seat?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. @Ethan
    Bezos isn't Jewish. I can't believe it's 2017 and I'm actually reading this anti-semitic trash. Are the people here too blinded in their hatred of Jews to even realize they are repeating the centuries-old conspiracy theory that Jews control the world. If Jews controlled the world, you think Israel would be constantly surrounded by enemies, constantly dogged in the UN? It should be noted that the majority of Jewish senators voted against the Iraq war resolution. The majority of neo-cons are non-Jews and the majority of Jews are not neo-cons. But because you can draw a link to 1 or 2 Jews here or there, all of a sudden we can lay a blanket accusation against "Jews." These views are absolutely disgusting and medieval. I can pick any political view, any single political view on Earth, and find a handful of Jews who support it (or Armenians, or Greeks, or Persian-Americans...), does that mean it's fair to lump "The Jews," into a political agenda? You people can try to intellectualize your anti-semitic trash all you want, but you're only reenacting an ancient animus.

    The Source of America’s Wars – Kristol Clear

    American politicians and media have fallen captive to the Zionist network. This is a lethal ailment that afflicts the US.

    Read More
    • LOL: chris
    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
    And yet, mainly because of Jewish control of our media, these charlatans who have been wrong on every single agenda are still given a podium from which to continue to spew their religion of war and world domination. It is well past time to roll out the guillotines and watch their heads tumble into brimming baskets for their crimes against humanity across the world, and not just upon our citizenry.

    Maybe God really does work in mysterious ways - and we are doomed to suffer these satanic beings and the consequences of their existence to somehow lift our spirits to a divine plane. Of course, as an atheist, I doubt that explanation for the absence of the Deity.

    It so past time for a real American revolution.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @anonymous
    Why the term 'neo-con'? There's nothing 'con' about any of it. It's more of a form of fascism than anything resembling American style conservatism. What's the big distinction between the invasions of places like Iraq and Mussolini's invasions of Ethiopia and the Balkans? The 'neos' are just a fascist variant.

    agreed, it’s not “con,” as in conservativism, but neither is it “fascism.’

    It’s Bolshevism.

    Mussolini’s invasion of Ethiopia was an offense, but the Italians did not destroy Ethiopia they way Allies destroyed Iraq (and Germany, Syria, Libya . . .). That compulsion to destroy is not an Italian characteristic, it is Bolshevik.

    Italians left behind a greatly improved Libya

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_settlers_in_Libya

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. Sowhat says:
    @Rurik

    As for the “Jews”, they could do very little without plenty of goyim willing to play their game
     
    too true

    I have far more contempt for the traitorous scum gushing their fealty to this impertinent Jew than I have for the Jew himself

    http://sheffield.indymedia.org.uk/images/2011/06/480306.jpg

    Jacques, we could substitute NK heads on all in the audience and KJU’S head on BB and it would leave all with the same horrible impression.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. utu says:
    @Grandpa Charlie
    I found the first paragraph much more interesting than the others.

    “Heidigger said the Jews had absorbed materialism and cosmopolitanism into their core identity. They are thus distinct from other people for whom usury is a vice, not an identity” -- Lemurmaniac
     
    The first sentence would seem to be prospective, while the second is retrospective ... from, I suppose, a present of maybe anno 1900. What I mean is that as of about, say, 1900, Heidigger considered Jews to be on an average more materialistic and cosmopolitan -- what we might now think of as more prone toward 'scientism' or rationalism, denying any 'spirit', and more what we might now call 'globalist' -- than gentiles. So, Jews were perhaps better positioned at the onset of the 20th Century than were gentiles.

    The second sentence, by contrast, is retrospective. That is, as of about 1900, looking back into the past, it may have been the case that Jews were given a monopoly on interest-bearing loans, at least the legal ones, although I have read some primary and secondary historical sources that document how Christian (Catholic) clergy were also profiting from such usurious business.

    Certainly, imho, a theory of usury has been incorporated into the concept (or myth?) of 'modernity' by way of popularization of the purely mathematical theory of compound interest. We can see this in the term, "magic of compound interest". Out of this developed the theory of endless economic growth. It was a part of the popular culture propagated by 'financial gurus' for probably the last half of the 20th Century, that money is somehow like a tree, it just naturally grows and, like a tree, the rate of growth just naturally applies continuously to the tree - the new growth and the old growth alike -- just like your bank account where the interest earned is "naturally" capitalized. Much the same equations applied in both situations ... the Chapman-Richards equation and the compound interest equation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=212&v=653DWJmfTK8

    “magic of compound interest”. Out of this developed the theory of endless economic growth

    There is no magic. And nothing is endless. Any system that has population growth require economic growth. Any system that has debt base money creation system will require population growth which leads to the requirement of economic growth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger

    Any system that has debt base[d] money creation system will require population growth which leads to the requirement of economic growth.
     
    I believe that is the very definition of a Ponzi Scheme.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. @Giuseppe

    He said that all Yankees are Jews, behave like Jews, aspire to be Jews and even are circumcised like Jews.
     
    Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.

    “Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.” — Giuseppe (@ #33)

    Dr. Dean Edel, sponsored by Penn & Teller: “Circumcision: Make the informed decision featuring Dr. Dean Edell”

    Read More
    • Agree: edNels
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. KenH says:

    Jews may not have started WWI, but according to Henry Ford and his researchers, Jewish bankers and industrialists did their part in prolonging the conflict. England supported the Balfour Declaration in exchange for Jews using their influence with America to enter the war on the side of the Allies.

    Charles Lindbergh cited the efforts of organized Jewry as one of the three main groups pushing for America to enter WWII against the Axis powers. Jewish financier Bernard Baruch was known to be FDR’s main Svengali which arguably influenced his opinion towards Germany and the conduct of the war.

    Pat Buchanan referred to the U.S. Senate as “Israeli occupied territory” in the 1990 run up to the first Iraq War. The necons of the 21st century need to introduction. Virginia Congressman Jim Moran blamed Jewish lobbying for the second Iraq war of 2003. Upon retirement in 2005, outgoing Senator Ernest Hollings said the U.S. is unable to have a foreign policy independent from the demands of Israel.

    Read More
    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Debbie Menon
    The Washington Post reviewing They Dare to Speak Out wrote "former congressman Paul Findley's message is straightforward and valid: Israeli influence in the United States, including in the inner sanctums of government, is very strong."

    Tillerson State Dept. Demanding Israel Hand Back Millions in U.S. Military Aid
    https://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2017/09/22/tillerson-state-dept-demanding-israel-hand-back-millions-in-u-s-military-aid/

    Jim Abourezk is a former Democratic senator from South Dakota. He writes: The hidden cost of free congressional trips to Israel For years, Israel has relied on billions of dollars in US taxpayer money. Shutting off this government funding would seriously impair Israel's harsh occupation.
    https://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0126/p09s01-coop.html
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. edNels says:
    @Giuseppe

    He said that all Yankees are Jews, behave like Jews, aspire to be Jews and even are circumcised like Jews.
     
    Circumcision is a peculiar symptom of the national obsessive-compulsive disorder that has nothing to do with the Jews and everything to do with not being like the dirty Irish.

    Well don’t forget all the rest of continental Europe and Russia. Who’s idea was it to start cutting babies’ dicks? Ritual, not so just ritual excuse me! it is Castration light.

    Takes off a huge amount of the natural feeling a man might need in certain circumstances, like, not to be course, but after momma has delivered twins say, there is a time when sex commences again, and she isn’t tight like before, how about some f’n sensitivity about that then!?

    Who gains from it? Not only is it bad, but it says… loud and clear: ”Who’s your papa?”
    like Teli used to say. You know there’s a presence of something evil there that came up with that idea.

    It is a primordial curse, upon seeing daylight the first time, he is abused to the max, and remembers it for life. Wake up Eloi.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. @Rurik

    As for the “Jews”, they could do very little without plenty of goyim willing to play their game
     
    too true

    I have far more contempt for the traitorous scum gushing their fealty to this impertinent Jew than I have for the Jew himself

    http://sheffield.indymedia.org.uk/images/2011/06/480306.jpg

    This has to be the most contemptible demonstration of venal treachery that is the source of our national distress. Damn them all to hell.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Debbie Menon
    The Source of America's Wars - Kristol Clear

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBCxYicxTow

    American politicians and media have fallen captive to the Zionist network. This is a lethal ailment that afflicts the US.

    And yet, mainly because of Jewish control of our media, these charlatans who have been wrong on every single agenda are still given a podium from which to continue to spew their religion of war and world domination. It is well past time to roll out the guillotines and watch their heads tumble into brimming baskets for their crimes against humanity across the world, and not just upon our citizenry.

    Maybe God really does work in mysterious ways – and we are doomed to suffer these satanic beings and the consequences of their existence to somehow lift our spirits to a divine plane. Of course, as an atheist, I doubt that explanation for the absence of the Deity.

    It so past time for a real American revolution.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. @utu
    “magic of compound interest”. Out of this developed the theory of endless economic growth

    There is no magic. And nothing is endless. Any system that has population growth require economic growth. Any system that has debt base money creation system will require population growth which leads to the requirement of economic growth.

    Any system that has debt base[d] money creation system will require population growth which leads to the requirement of economic growth.

    I believe that is the very definition of a Ponzi Scheme.

    Read More
    • Agree: utu
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. Dear Mr. Israel,
    I enjoy reading most of what you right and your witty observations. Thank you. My thanks also to Mr. Unz for allowing this free (but useful) speech.
    You are right with the remedy, but not just for America but all of humanity. If we can remember that all of us descended from one single family, created by the Holy One of Israel in His own image, then we will stop pillaging and murdering one another and start sharing and cooperating in our short life span of 70 or maybe 80 years.
    Then Prophet Isaiah’s words shall come to pass on this very earth, not only in the afterlife. For the Kingdom of God is in our midst.
    Isaiah 2
    3 … for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.

    4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

    5 O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the Lord.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    "If we can remember that all of us descended from one single family, created by the Holy One of Israel in His own image, then we will stop pillaging and murdering one another and start sharing and cooperating in our short life span of 70 or maybe 80 years.

    Pure comedy genius! I think I could get you a spot at the Laugh Factory on Sunset with that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. @KenH
    Jews may not have started WWI, but according to Henry Ford and his researchers, Jewish bankers and industrialists did their part in prolonging the conflict. England supported the Balfour Declaration in exchange for Jews using their influence with America to enter the war on the side of the Allies.

    Charles Lindbergh cited the efforts of organized Jewry as one of the three main groups pushing for America to enter WWII against the Axis powers. Jewish financier Bernard Baruch was known to be FDR's main Svengali which arguably influenced his opinion towards Germany and the conduct of the war.

    Pat Buchanan referred to the U.S. Senate as "Israeli occupied territory" in the 1990 run up to the first Iraq War. The necons of the 21st century need to introduction. Virginia Congressman Jim Moran blamed Jewish lobbying for the second Iraq war of 2003. Upon retirement in 2005, outgoing Senator Ernest Hollings said the U.S. is unable to have a foreign policy independent from the demands of Israel.

    The Washington Post reviewing They Dare to Speak Out wrote “former congressman Paul Findley’s message is straightforward and valid: Israeli influence in the United States, including in the inner sanctums of government, is very strong.”

    Tillerson State Dept. Demanding Israel Hand Back Millions in U.S. Military Aid

    https://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2017/09/22/tillerson-state-dept-demanding-israel-hand-back-millions-in-u-s-military-aid/

    Jim Abourezk is a former Democratic senator from South Dakota. He writes: The hidden cost of free congressional trips to Israel For years, Israel has relied on billions of dollars in US taxpayer money. Shutting off this government funding would seriously impair Israel’s harsh occupation.

    https://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0126/p09s01-coop.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    It's a start but 75 million isn't a lot compared to the billions given.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    The US entered WWI in 1917

    The U.S. declared war on Germany in 1917 but the FED allowed the U.S. Government to finance the war effort of Britain and their allies by the fiat money that the FED created. The scoundrel Woodrow Wilson became president on an anti war platform while all along he was preparing for the U.S. entry into WWI under the influence of the illuminati Colonel Edward House and the mega millionaire Bernard Baruch.
    The rest is history. But one thing we cannot deny is that the biggest disaster for Europe was the U.S. involvement into the European mayhem. That American interference led to the refusal of Britain to negotiate a peaceful settlement of the war on a a status quo ante which the Germans offered from a position of power in 1916 ( for further information on the subject check Benjamin Freedman lecture on the subject of WWI) This American involvement, which was backed by Jewish controlled media and the military industrial complex was a prelude to the modus operandi that fuelled the recent wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and the one under planning against Iran.
    So, yes indeed the American historic drive to wars, from those fought against the native Americans to those fought against Canada in 1812 and Mexico in 1846, were not triggered by the influence of the Jews the way it is done today with the U.S. media under the control of Zionist Jews, but the Rothchild Jews were then just as now a key player in the American war drive, and the war of 1812 had to do with the renewal of the charter of the Central Bank of the U.S. more than any geopolitical consideration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    The non Jewish British were as culpable as House and Baruch in conning us into WW 1
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. @shamireader
    Dear Mr. Israel,
    I enjoy reading most of what you right and your witty observations. Thank you. My thanks also to Mr. Unz for allowing this free (but useful) speech.
    You are right with the remedy, but not just for America but all of humanity. If we can remember that all of us descended from one single family, created by the Holy One of Israel in His own image, then we will stop pillaging and murdering one another and start sharing and cooperating in our short life span of 70 or maybe 80 years.
    Then Prophet Isaiah's words shall come to pass on this very earth, not only in the afterlife. For the Kingdom of God is in our midst.
    Isaiah 2
    3 ... for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.

    4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

    5 O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the Lord.

    “If we can remember that all of us descended from one single family, created by the Holy One of Israel in His own image, then we will stop pillaging and murdering one another and start sharing and cooperating in our short life span of 70 or maybe 80 years.

    Pure comedy genius! I think I could get you a spot at the Laugh Factory on Sunset with that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Would that be Adam and Eve and their children?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. @Debbie Menon
    The Washington Post reviewing They Dare to Speak Out wrote "former congressman Paul Findley's message is straightforward and valid: Israeli influence in the United States, including in the inner sanctums of government, is very strong."

    Tillerson State Dept. Demanding Israel Hand Back Millions in U.S. Military Aid
    https://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2017/09/22/tillerson-state-dept-demanding-israel-hand-back-millions-in-u-s-military-aid/

    Jim Abourezk is a former Democratic senator from South Dakota. He writes: The hidden cost of free congressional trips to Israel For years, Israel has relied on billions of dollars in US taxpayer money. Shutting off this government funding would seriously impair Israel's harsh occupation.
    https://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0126/p09s01-coop.html

    It’s a start but 75 million isn’t a lot compared to the billions given.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger

    It’s a start but 75 million isn’t a lot compared to the billions given.
     
    The fact that we won't even get that paltry $75 million back is revealing and sad.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. pyrrhus says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    The US entered WWI in 1917

    Yes, though the Jewish Wall Streeters pushed for it as part of the Balfour Declaration deal…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Kaganovich, Rakosi, Marcuse, Wolf and Slovo were a “kabbalah of power” as evil as any that ever existed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  158. @NoseytheDuke
    It's a start but 75 million isn't a lot compared to the billions given.

    It’s a start but 75 million isn’t a lot compared to the billions given.

    The fact that we won’t even get that paltry $75 million back is revealing and sad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. Adolph says:

    The reason Jews win is because of people like the owner of this blog censor the cure for Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  160. He said that all Yankees are Jews, behave like Jews, aspire to be Jews … So it is natural that real Jews succeed better in being Jews than their Gentile neighbours.

    All of America is Yankee now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  161. @The Alarmist
    Remember the old adage for success in the world of WASPs: "Think Yiddish, dress British."

    A serious case can be made for replacing the income tax, which has the potential to keep people from becoming wealthy, with a wealth tax, which has the effect of making people pay in proportion to their longer-term success and influence in the system. A millennial might say that this would be a more sustainable way to run things.

    Your idea is admittedly appealing in some respects. But we should be careful what we wish for with a wealth tax.

    We might like to imagine a wealth tax hitting only “the truly rich”, e.g. people with a net worth in the millions of dollars excluding their house. With the nascent Third World majority that the USA will soon have, however, it will not be hard to convince people of the “fairness” of a wealth tax that kicks in at low enough levels of wealth to hit your family and mine.

    Think that the Dems right now could get a majority of Californians to vote for a tax on all assets (including savings) held by California residents in excess of $1,000,000 per person or $2,000,000 per couple? I think they could. I think they will.

    As the State becomes even more composed of lower-income, lower-skill, less educated non-American people — most of whom pay no federal income tax and not much state income tax — could they eventually amend the law to include primary residences in that $500,000 or $1,000,000 threshold that triggers the wealth tax, so that most CA homeowners will be paying the new tax? You bet they will.

    The government could even include the value of retirement accounts or college-savings accounts in the net-worth calculation, extending the wealth tax to even more non-rich people. How many federal judges on the bench already, would uphold such a tax? How many federal judges will uphold such a wealth tax after the Dems get back in the White House for eight years and nominate the rest of the judiciary, as they almost inevitably will?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Obama and Bernie sanders pushed something called "pension equality"
    It meant taking the money from 401 Ks annunities and Iras and giving the money to people who never worked or only had a small amount from social security due to intermittent work.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. Alden says:
    @Anonymous
    I thought the ascent of Jewish power in America started in 1913?

    One year after that, America entered WWI...

    A few US history books barely mention that we borrowed 13 billion in 1773 currency from the French government.

    Very few US history books mention that the French government borrowed that 13 billion from the Grand Duke of Hesse and other Frankfort Germany bankers including Meyer Rothschild.

    So Jewish bankers were involved from the beginning. And all during the 1850s Confederate emissaries were in Europe begging for loans from largely Jewish bankers. That’s why they sent Judah Benjamin to manage their investment during the civil war.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Alden says:
    @RadicalCenter
    Your idea is admittedly appealing in some respects. But we should be careful what we wish for with a wealth tax.

    We might like to imagine a wealth tax hitting only "the truly rich", e.g. people with a net worth in the millions of dollars excluding their house. With the nascent Third World majority that the USA will soon have, however, it will not be hard to convince people of the "fairness" of a wealth tax that kicks in at low enough levels of wealth to hit your family and mine.

    Think that the Dems right now could get a majority of Californians to vote for a tax on all assets (including savings) held by California residents in excess of $1,000,000 per person or $2,000,000 per couple? I think they could. I think they will.

    As the State becomes even more composed of lower-income, lower-skill, less educated non-American people -- most of whom pay no federal income tax and not much state income tax -- could they eventually amend the law to include primary residences in that $500,000 or $1,000,000 threshold that triggers the wealth tax, so that most CA homeowners will be paying the new tax? You bet they will.

    The government could even include the value of retirement accounts or college-savings accounts in the net-worth calculation, extending the wealth tax to even more non-rich people. How many federal judges on the bench already, would uphold such a tax? How many federal judges will uphold such a wealth tax after the Dems get back in the White House for eight years and nominate the rest of the judiciary, as they almost inevitably will?

    Obama and Bernie sanders pushed something called “pension equality”
    It meant taking the money from 401 Ks annunities and Iras and giving the money to people who never worked or only had a small amount from social security due to intermittent work.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. Alden says:
    @NoseytheDuke
    "If we can remember that all of us descended from one single family, created by the Holy One of Israel in His own image, then we will stop pillaging and murdering one another and start sharing and cooperating in our short life span of 70 or maybe 80 years.

    Pure comedy genius! I think I could get you a spot at the Laugh Factory on Sunset with that.

    Would that be Adam and Eve and their children?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Alden says:
    @Joe Levantine
    The U.S. declared war on Germany in 1917 but the FED allowed the U.S. Government to finance the war effort of Britain and their allies by the fiat money that the FED created. The scoundrel Woodrow Wilson became president on an anti war platform while all along he was preparing for the U.S. entry into WWI under the influence of the illuminati Colonel Edward House and the mega millionaire Bernard Baruch.
    The rest is history. But one thing we cannot deny is that the biggest disaster for Europe was the U.S. involvement into the European mayhem. That American interference led to the refusal of Britain to negotiate a peaceful settlement of the war on a a status quo ante which the Germans offered from a position of power in 1916 ( for further information on the subject check Benjamin Freedman lecture on the subject of WWI) This American involvement, which was backed by Jewish controlled media and the military industrial complex was a prelude to the modus operandi that fuelled the recent wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and the one under planning against Iran.
    So, yes indeed the American historic drive to wars, from those fought against the native Americans to those fought against Canada in 1812 and Mexico in 1846, were not triggered by the influence of the Jews the way it is done today with the U.S. media under the control of Zionist Jews, but the Rothchild Jews were then just as now a key player in the American war drive, and the war of 1812 had to do with the renewal of the charter of the Central Bank of the U.S. more than any geopolitical consideration.

    The non Jewish British were as culpable as House and Baruch in conning us into WW 1

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Israel Shamir Comments via RSS