The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Slate’s Resident Idiot Slanders Jewish Woman -- Me
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_196606184

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

When Slate magazine went after President Trump’s former speech writer, Darren Beattie, it chose to libel this writer, as well.

That’s a bully’s calculus: If you can, why not ruin the reputation of another individual, just for good measure?

Ruining reputations by labeling and libeling unpopular others is all in a day’s work for the bully, who has nothing in his authorial quiver but ad hominem attack.

The individual who penned an unsourced hit piece on me is Slate magazine’s designated “chief news blogger.”

A hit piece is “a published article or post aiming to sway public opinion by presenting false or biased information in a way that appears objective and truthful.”

Our intrepid journalist does not even feign objectivity.

Indeed, nothing screams Fake News like a “newsman” engaging in sloppy slander.

Incidentally, double-barreled surnames are largely a feminist affection. “Mathis-Lilley” happens to be male. Or, rather, an excuse for a man. Real men don’t bully, berate and bitch baselessly.

That’s what my many dogged, anti-Semitic, unmanly readers do. (Yes, I’m a Jewish, independent writer, the daughter of a scholarly, penniless rabbi. Bullies invariably target the weakest.)

The Mathis-Lilley article was published on August 20, this year, in the section called “The Slatest.” (Slate does cutesy and corny quite well.)

Mathis-Lilley lies throughout the piece, starting with the title:

“White House Speechwriter Appeared on Panel With Author Who Compared Black South Africans to Cannibals.”

It didn’t happen. No such comparisons were made. Cannibalism serves merely as metaphor in my book, “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa.”

The origin of the title is expressly and unambiguously explained in the Introduction. “It is inspired by Ayn Rand’s wise counsel against prostrating civilization to savagery.” (p. 8)

The exact Rand quote is citation No. 15 in “Into the cannibal’s Pot.” It comes courtesy of “Robert Mayhew (ed.), Ayn Rand Answers: The Best of Her Q&A (New York, 2005).”

Unlike Mathis-Lilley’s unsourced material in Slate , “Into the Cannibal’s Pot” is topped and tailed with hard evidence, and sports over 800 endnotes.

Based on the evidence presented, readers come to see “that South Africans had been tossed into the metaphorical cannibal’s pot.” (p. 9)

These are facts, not slander. Slander is Slate’s purview.

Duly, ignored was my polite request, addressed to Slate’s editors, to let me counter Mathis-Lilley’s lies over their pixelated pages.

After all, did not their chief counsel, Ava Lubell, Esq., promise me in email (Sept. 10, 2018, 4:22 p.m.) that Slate takes “the accuracy of [its] work seriously and would appreciate your identifying what factual inaccuracies you believe the piece contains”?

Yes, she did. Chief counsel for Slate clearly didn’t think Slate’s fidelity to facts was brought into disrepute by an unsound, unfounded cry, straight from the reptilian brain of their news correspondent:

“Ilana mercer is a real piece of work, racism-wise!”

Such puritanical zeal would have landed Mathis-Lilley a spot on Cotton Mather’s “special court to try the witchcraft cases,” in Salem, Massachusetts, circa 1692.

“Goody Mercer, burn her, burn her.” “‘Goody’ was a form of address for women,” in the days when women were offed for so-called sorcery.

In what is “Goody Mercer nee Isaacson” implicated, next?

Why, for the “insanely unsubtle” “cover art of ‘Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa.’” “[I]nsanely unsubtle”: Mathis is no wordsmith. His choice of adjectives is positively Kardashian.

The cover art, of course, is the publisher’s purview, not that of the author.

In anticipation of the Mathis-Lilleys of the world, the publisher chose to preface my text with a “Publisher’s Note.”

He wrote, “[‘Into the Cannibal’s Pot’] is about ideas and ideology. When losing an intellectual argument, there are despicable people who point an accusing finger and shout racism.”

Schooled in epithets, not argument, Mathis-Lilley goes on to claim that Steve Bannon uttered the “N-word,” and that, by extension, I was a sympathizer of such ugly utterances.

Oh, Mathis-Lilley hedges his words all right. Legalistic phrases like “Mercer seems to” bedeck his sub-par prose. But that’s just dirty, dishonest, underhanded writing. Never have I used the language attributed to Bannon.

Never. I could not. I would not.

The daughter of Rabbi Ben Isaacson would never use language so foul about another human being.

Daddy was a noted anti-apartheid activist before it became a fashionable and safe virtue-signaling pastime. The book maligned by Slate’s Mathis-Lilley as “racist” pays homage to dad (who refuses to leave his South Africa), for being “…a leader in the Promethean struggle to end apartheid. Rabbi Abraham Benzion Isaacson’s fight for justice for South Africa’s blacks was inspired by the advanced concept of Jewish social justice showcased in Deuteronomy and in The Prophets. …” (“Into the Cannibal’s Pot,” 2011, pp. 185-186.)

Mathis-Lilley is a pig of a man (with apologies to pigs which I love and do not eat). The woman he dubs “a real piece of work, racism-wise” worked tirelessly against petty apartheid.

A couple of pathos-filled pages in “Into the Cannibal’s Pot” detail how, in one single day, with nothing but determination, this “racist” broke a bit of the apartheid bureaucracy, to benefit a beloved domestic worker, Ethel, tribal name Nomasomi Khala. (pp. 70-72)

Accompanied by me, Ethel entered the Department of Home Affairs in Cape Town as a woman whose tribal marriage was unrecognized by the authorities, whose kids (in tow) were without birth certificates, and whose decades of toil left her bereft of state benefits.

Ethel was not in The System. She was stateless. But not for long.

When we departed the Department, that same day, Ethel and Jim, her husband of 25 years, had had their union solemnized by a grumpy magistrate, summoned at my insistence. And the children—bless them, they had dressed to the nines for the occasion—had birth certificates.

Good people, Mathis-Lilley, act. Bad people badmouth.

Next, Slate’s pseudo-newsman contends that “Mercer thinks getting rid of apartheid has been bad for South Africa.”

Lilley lies, again.

“Into the Cannibal’s Pot” condemns apartheid, calling it “one of the world’s most retrogressive colonial systems.” (p. 65) “Apartheid showed a gross disrespect for human rights and international law,” I wrote (p. 222).

What I do condemn in the book is “unrestrained majoritarianism” or “simple majority rule,” as applied in South Africa (and America).

Need I remind the crushingly stupid Lilley that “America’s founding fathers had attempted to forestall raw democracy by devising a republic” (p. 9)?

Lilley likely doesn’t even know that, in mediating the political dispensation in the New South Africa, “Anglo-American elites,” condemned in my book, sidelined South Africa’s indigenous, leading intellectuals, one black (Dr. Mangosuthu Buthelezi), the other white (Fredrick van Zyl Slabbert).

Both these classical liberals are cited as opposing “unrestrained majoritarianism,” and in support of a “power-sharing constitutional dispensation.” (p. 222)

Both favored “a multi-racial, decentralized federation, in which elites of the various groups agree to share executive power and abide by a system of mutual vetoes and spheres of communal autonomy.”

I write in strong support of the thing instantiated in the U.S. Bill of Rights, “the preservation of the rights of cultural groups and the protection of minorities.” (p. 222)

One last ugly, baseless idea imputed to me by the lying Lilley is that I think “white people shouldn’t support democracy in countries in which they’re a minority population because they will be exterminated by nonwhite savages.”

And I’m the pseudo-intellectual?

Every democratic theorist worth his salt knows that South Africa doesn’t even qualify as a democracy.

ORDER IT NOW

The scholarly data cited in “Into the Cannibal’s Pot” stipulate that a prerequisite for a classical liberal democracy is that majority and minority status should be interchangeable and fluid; that a ruling majority party should be as likely to become a minority party as the obverse.

By contrast, in South Africa, the majority and the minorities are permanent, not temporary. And voting is strictly along racial lines.

If majority and minority are perpetual or fixed, then government ceases to have a mediating or remedial function. It becomes an instrument of perpetual oppression of the minority by the majority.

That’s untrammeled tyranny.

In the U.S., we still have a rotating duopoly, for what it’s worth. But not for long.

To that I object. Of that I warn.

As regards Ben Mathis-Lilley. Look, this is the Age of the Idiot. Idiots have come into their own in a big way. The Lilliputian Mathis-Lilley is not working with much.

But what’s Slate’s excuse?

Ilana Mercer’s weekly, paleolibertarian think piece has been going strong since 1999. She is the author of “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011) & “The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed (June, 2016). She’s on Twitter, Facebook,Gab & YouTube

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Media, Political Correctness 
Hide 151 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again — it’s the very definition of hypocrisy for blacks who call each other by the N-word to condemn anyone else for using it. Realistically though it’s probably white SJW’s who freak out the most about it.

  2. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    How much do you think this outrage will affect the sales of your book?

  3. tac says:

    Why do the supremacist Jews refuse to take accountability in their role for slavery?:

    Educate yourself here:

    http://www.unz.com/ishamir/pittsburgh-advice-to-jews/#comment-2615210

    and here:

    http://www.unz.com/ishamir/pittsburgh-advice-to-jews/#comment-2615278

    • Replies: @Wally
  4. anon[112] • Disclaimer says:

    That’s what my many dogged, anti-Semitic, unmanly readers do. (Yes, I’m a Jewish, independent writer, the daughter of a scholarly, penniless rabbi. Bullies invariably target the weakest.)

    poor girl

    • Replies: @Moi
  5. anon[112] • Disclaimer says:

    Daddy was a noted anti-apartheid activist before it became a fashionable and safe virtue-signaling pastime.

    i hear israel is basically an apartheid state, what is your beloved daddy doing about that?

  6. Thomm says:
    @Fidelios Automata

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again — it’s the very definition of hypocrisy for blacks who call each other by the N-word to condemn anyone else for using it.

    You are right.

    Remember, as well, that White Trashionalists are also ‘wiggers’, but do not address each other as such.

    • Replies: @TRASH(NOT)
  7. Baxter says:

    Hi everybody! I’m a Jew who opposes racism, however. I support Israel, which is an ethnostate, as the homeland of the Jews.
    Yes, you caught me red handed. I am full of it.
    Maybe if I was 20 years younger someone might give a damn.

    • Replies: @Biff
  8. ” The daughter of Rabbi Ben Isaacson would never use language so foul about another human being. ”
    According to jewish theology just jews are human beings: google ‘gentiles in halacha’.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  9. @anon

    Hopefully staying out of it, its affairs, and its interests, as should many in the US.

    • Replies: @anon
  10. As far as I can tell, Mercer is in favor of consocial democracy, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consociationalism

    #Metoo, but it runs against American historical unitary ideas (one nation, undivided). Sure enough, Americans are not more a nation & consociationalism would work better for them. But, they’re not wise enough.

    For consocial democracy, you have to have restrained & wise populations, which can hardly be found anywhere.

  11. Thank you Ilana, that was a superb clarification and flogging of yet another lighweight twerp at slate magazine. Where do these brainless twits come from?

    Apartheid is evil wherever it is and many Americans were heroic in their struggle to destroy it in South Africa. In many countries sporting matches turned into battlegrounds between police and protest at visiting whites only football or cricket teams. The global boycott and disinvest strategies were resoundingly successful against South African apartheid and global corporations that tried to continue business with that evil state. Throughout the world boycott and disinvest remains a strong force in the hands of people of goodwill and strong purpose in support of the powerless and oppressed. If any readers doubt this or seek to get a bigger picture then read Saul Alinsky and his Rules for Radicals and ponder the enormous contribution that book made then and now in the struggle for freedom. Don’t ever let any law into your land that limits your power to advocate for boycott or disinvest. I am looking forward to reading your book Into the Cannibals Pot and so should we all.

  12. EagleEyeX says:
    @anon

    Rock on ANON …..let’s see if she gets back to you …..I doubt it.

    • Replies: @Quebecer
    , @Wizard of Oz
  13. Biff says:
    @Baxter

    I support Israel, which is an ethnostate, as the homeland of the Jews.

    Fine by many, as long as you stay there, and stay out of the affairs of others it’s all good.

  14. JessicaR says:
    @Fidelios Automata

    In my experience, educated African-Americans do not use this word and disapprove of other members of their community do so. When I taught in what was demographically an inner-city school, the word was used, not in a teasing, ironic way, but in hatred, to wound.

    There is no good reason to use a word whose sole purpose is to degrade. None. A decent concern for the sensitivities of other people should teach us this.

    Name-calling is the mark of someone who is uneducated, troubled, or just plain mean. I always tell my current (mostly white) students to never go out with a man who uses ethnic slurs. I have found that such men are often severe misogynists. By this I don’t mean that they believe women should fill traditional gender roles; rather, that they despise women–except the young, beautiful ones they want to have sex with–and are more likely to be violent.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @John Done
  15. Quebecer says:
    @EagleEyeX

    If she gets back to you or anon, or any of your ilk, it will probably be to thank you to so clearly prove her right.

    Some people simply can’t disagree with an author’s ideas without stooping down to petsonal attacks.

  16. neutral says:

    Bullies invariably target the weakest

    Yes that pure blameless jew, all they want is to be left alone. They cause harm to nobody, it is crazy to believe otherwise.

    • Agree: jacques sheete
  17. @EagleEyeX

    He lives in South Africa doesn’t he, not Israel?

  18. @uncle tungsten

    ” Apartheid is evil wherever it is and many Americans were heroic in their struggle to destroy it in South Africa. In many countries sporting matches turned into battlegrounds between police and protest at visiting whites only football or cricket teams. The global boycott and disinvest strategies were resoundingly successful against South African apartheid and global corporations that tried to continue business with that evil state. ”

    You have not yet realised that under black rule South Africa is becoming a shithole country comparable to Zimbabwe ?
    The simple truth is that black South Africans are too stupid to rule themselves.
    Whites are leaving, the first bank is bankrupt.
    I am not defending apartheid, but at the same time I’m able to see a rich country destroying itself, as Venezuela did.

  19. Jake says:

    “That’s what my many dogged, anti-Semitic, unmanly readers do.”

    I would bet that at least half of your anti-Semitic readers are Jewish working for, in some sense, the ADL or SPLC or the Sorus empire or AIPAC, etc.

  20. So, I take a look at Unz this morning, see the featured piece by Ilana Mercer, see that there are already 17 comments, and my immediate thought is, “how far down the comment thread do I have to go before they start?”

    Regrettably, my guess (almost immediately) was correct.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @tac
  21. I think this woman has a sense of humor.

    Real men don’t bully, berate and bitch baselessly.

    That’s what my many dogged, anti-Semitic, unmanly readers do. (Yes, I’m a Jewish, independent writer, the daughter of a scholarly, penniless rabbi. Bullies invariably target the weakest.)

    Or maybe she doesn’t notice that by her definition, the Zio-nutz aren’t real men. Or Izzit OK for “real women” and “Semites” to bully, berate and bitch baselessly or not? Why or why not, Ms Mercer?

    Maybe I’m overlooking the fact that the “ChosenOnes” are so special that they can bully, berate and bitch baselessly and ceaselessly with impunity. I’ve seen no evidence that the author does anything but whine, so what makes her so special other than the fact that her fawtha is a scholarly (of course high IQ), penniless, (and no doubt persecuted), rabbi and without a doubt, a victim, of long, maybe even genetic, standing?

    Gimmee a break.

  22. @Thomm

    Our resident Hindoo (apparently a so called “based” one at that) pops out like a weasel with his clockwork about “whiggers”. Your millennial whack job friend “Jeff Stryker” should turn up anytime now.

    You’ll croon about said “whiggers” and why we should open the floodgates for “highly skilled” immigrants especially from India while he will regale us all with his tales about DeToiLet (that once was) and how a white man must try his best to chase tight poontang across wide swathes of SEA and let the grown ups run his country to the ground.

    If you think about it, your advice is completely orthogonal to his so one wonders which one makes more “sense”

    • Replies: @neutral
    , @anon
    , @Thomm
  23. @jilles dykstra

    Good one, jiles!

    Isn’t it cute how they employ “sly” little “technicalities” like that to excuse themselves and damn everyone else and hope we dumb goyim don’t notice? They pride themselves on their cleverness, but more often than not, they’re too clever by half, I think.

  24. Having a bad day, are we?

  25. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reactionary Utopian

    Wait a second. Didn’t the author start it, with her headline?

    It doesn’t appear that Mr. Mathis-Lilley back in August said the first thing about Ms. Mercer being Jewish. So unless I’ve missed something,* she’s exploiting her family’s background to clickbait some sales of her fading book. Apparently feigned outrage in any case.

    * It can be hard to decipher the contrived alliterations and other AngryGirl effects. And, no, we shouldn’t have to jump over to other websites to unscramble Ms. Mercer’s argument that she was libeled.

    • Replies: @Quebecer
  26. Idiots have come into their own in a big way.

    Yes. Yes they have.

    People may argue the wisdom and/or morality of apartheid endlessly, but if one expected its end in any fashion other than the way it has gone…

    A system under stress will react in a direction to relieve the stress. Le Chatelier

  27. @jilles dykstra

    I am not defending apartheid, but at the same time I’m able to see a rich country destroying itself, as Venezuela did.

    As Venezuela did? How about what the US is doing to itself? I have a suspicion that South Africa is not ruled by blacks so much as the usual international moneybags and that’s mainly what’s making it a “shithole” if that’s what it is. The politicians who seem to be in control are probably nothing more than puppets just as they are in the USA but I suspect neither you, nor I, nor the author of this goofy piece know much about what’s really going on there.

    I do have a few clues about SA history and as a primer may I suggest you read Douglas Reed’s take on it? “Somewhere South of Suez ” would be a good start, and it does fit an often recurring pattern, so he’s probably onto something. A sample follows.

    [MORE]

    Here in Johannesburg begins the master-process of the twentieth century, which appears to me to operate above the comprehension of republican farmer and colonizing Britisher alike. Here the gold is taken from the earth which is then sent to America and reburied, retaining even in its second entombment some magic property which enables it to vitalize or withhold loans and credit operations, to selected political ends, all over the globe. So marvelous a mineral is gold that, the deeper you inter it, the more potent it is. Here in Johannesburg are born martial aid and Marshall Aid, lend-lease and UNRRA, gifts of arms and money alike to the Soviet State and its satellites and to those who may be called on to oppose them. (I noted with delight a report from Washington, dated July 16th, 1948, that ‘pressure will be brought to bear on countries which show reluctance to accept Marshall Plan loans’.) So subtle and yet simple is this process that even the country which supplies the gold which is the basis of credit, may be denied credit if its government is disliked by the guardians of the gold at its re-interment. Thus, South Africa itself, when it elected in 1948 a government which was disliked by some quarters in New York, was promptly and repeatedly told that it could not hope for ‘a loan’ until this government mended its ways or a new one were returned. As all South African Governments (and as far as I know all governments) are members of an International Monetary Fund which dictates the price of gold, escape from this thrall through the free marketing of gold was closed, and the ‘shortages’ immediately began. The gold continues to flow, as if it were a river beyond the control of man, to its tomb in Kentucky, and the political operations everywhere to be directed from the power-unit it operates there. Another great hoard is accumulating in the dark interior of the Soviet Empire. This appears to me to be the reality of world-power in the twentieth century, operating through or despite all parties, politicians and governments everywhere. A man need but learn who controls the use of the gold to know the secrets of this century.

    - Reed, Douglass, Somewhere South Of Suez, p19

    https://archive.org/details/SomewhereSouthOfSuez/page/n17

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @S
  28. nickels says:

    One minute, skimming, that I’ll never get back.

  29. neutral says:
    @TRASH(NOT)

    There is nothing to debate, he is a foreign invader who has the audacity to claim the right to decide how white people should live, he must be expelled from our lands.

  30. imbroglio says:

    Whenever Ilana posts a column here, the Jew bashing quickly begins. Just a bit more slowly than what used to go on at Takimag before Sailer, Goad and Taki got tired of it and eliminated the comment section. “If you can’t bash Jews intelligently, don’t bother.” Jew bashing on the alt’s (left and right) is standard fare. Even Ron Unz does his bit.

    To paraphrase Yeats, we live at time, here in America, when the center can’t hold, the best keep silent and the worst bang on the door at Tucker Carlson’s house, causing his wife to cower in the pantry. Ilana can hardly expect better treatment.

    Some punks, like the guy who wrote the hit piece, eventually get their due. Some don’t. Not everyone lands in Mephisto’s clutches who makes the Faustian bargain. But cultures do. Societies do. Ours will.

  31. T. Weed says:

    The author, whose articles I learn from and enjoy, says she is “Jewish”, and decries “unmanly” “dogged anti-Semites” who “bully and berate” her. When someone says, “I am a Christian”, I wonder how much nonsense she can believe, i.e., virgin birth, miracles, resurrection, etc. Similarly, does a “Jewish” woman ascribe to the racist Talmud, that Gentiles are so many cattle to be exploited by Jews? Here’s what I say: If pro-Zionist Pastor Hagee of a San Antonio Baptist church is a “Christian”, then I’m anti-Christian and proud of it. If Netanyahu, Dershowitz, Elie Weisel are “Semites”, then I’m an anti-Semite and proud of it.

  32. Realist says:

    Daddy was a noted anti-apartheid activist before it became a fashionable and safe virtue-signaling pastime.

    Yes, he was one of the first to promote what has turned South Africa into the shit hole it is today.

  33. Quebecer says:
    @anonymous

    I think the author is basically asking if it is possible for a Jewish person to write
    about any contentious subject without being told to shut up and getting insulted for
    the simple reason of being Jewish ?

  34. Time will tell! Only time is the true judge. Here is one example of her father highly educated person who did not know what he was doing, Many time actions of Jewish leadership results in unfavorable results for Jews. Sometime even in catastrophic results for Jewish diaspora,
    I already made a comment somewhere that this Jewish leadership push on US government to accept all scum from the rest of the world could result being devastating for the Jews.
    There are possibly many scenarios of the result, but analyze them would require a lot of pages, and hard work.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  35. Moi says:
    @anon

    …and certifiably nuts.

  36. neutral says:
    @Quebecer

    Who is shutting up who here exactly? All that I am seeing is the endless censorship happening by the tech giants (mostly jew owned) being guided by jewish outlets such as the ADL. The same already happened in the legacy media for decades. Now lets look at the opposite, do you see jews being shut down by anyone?

  37. @Quebecer

    I think the author is basically asking if it is possible for a Jewish person to write
    about any contentious subject without being told to shut up and getting insulted for
    the simple reason of being Jewish ?

    Well of course that’s what she’s whining about. How could it be otherwise? Since she and her ilk are perfect, there’s nothing to criticize (according to them), but something they can’t help, and therefore any critics are bullies, etc.

    Note how she, in so doing, gets a free pass to insult, bully and whine til the cows come home. The typical behavior would be hilarious if it weren’t so silly. And boring.

  38. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    C’mon, IR! How dare you challenge unquestionable authority? ;)

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  39. sarz says:

    Why is Unz publishing this? The woman has nothing to say and says that nothing badly, to boot.

    • Replies: @JLK
  40. @Quebecer

    Actually, while I usually enjoy Ilana’s writing and find something to think about (and, often, disagree with) in it, I thought this was one of her poorer efforts: personal score-settling with some soy boy at Slate, probably misplaced here because of the microscopic overlap between the readerships of Slate and the Unz Review. I’m not going to bother following a link to Slate, because I’m not in the mood to contemplate a steaming turd on this chilly November morning.

    However, one can’t help noticing that there’s a sizable, or at least vocal, segment of the Unz commentariat who can’t take it or leave it alone. “Don’t offer me Fred Reed; he’s a Mexican expat race traitor! Don’t offer me Ilana Mercer; she’s a Jew!” Look, folks, the term “snowflake” is coming to mind. Does the Unz Review have to be your personal safe space? C’mon, man up a little. If you know it’s worthless, go on to the next thing.

    • Agree: lavoisier
    • Replies: @Rogue
  41. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Quebecer

    Pfft. I think not.

    It’s right up there in black and white. She’s just trying to cash in on “Jewish Woman —Me,” injecting that irrelevant fact into some specious claim that she was libeled as being a racist. She wants the anti-Jewish comments, and then those who tsk-tsk them, hoping that someone throwing or ducking all of the apes**t will click over to Amazon to buy her aging book.

    Hey, professional provocateurs use clickbait. Ms. Mercer has done so here from time to time, such as once with a glamorous photo that she pathetically tried to suggest was something that Mr. Unz went out somewhere and found. (I was reminded of that episode by her trying to distance herself in this mess of an essay from the provocative picture on the cover of her book as within the “publisher’s purview.”) The difference between her and a Derbyshire or Weissberg is that she is so often self-referential and purportedly wronged.

    It’s embarrassingly transparent.

    • Replies: @Sean
  42. @jilles dykstra

    How are them Muslims working out for you in the Netherlands, smartypants?

  43. @neutral

    Just like the Negro will get rid off white man in South Africa and the Red man in the Americas… get some help!

  44. @jacques sheete

    What I’m writing about is what Dutchmen who lived in S Africa for decades told me how the country began to change after apartheid ended.
    Blacks do not rule the country administratively, next to any black administrator sits a white person doing the work.
    The politicians are black, but, as the situation worsens through misrule and corruption, they blame the white people, who leave, often get murdered.
    And of course then the situation deteriorates further.
    Cannot see how any multinational can do profitable business with such a mess.
    Writing this I am reminded about the period when the rule of the USA puppet shah in Iran was coming to an end.
    No western firm invested money any more in the country, long before the shah was deposed.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  45. @imbroglio

    A reply without any content, just suggesting that any criticism of jews has nothing to do with facts.

  46. JLK says:
    @sarz

    Her prose is disjunctive and almost every sentence is a new paragraph.

    • Replies: @Sean
  47. @neutral

    Well if you think he is audacious, then you haven’t really debated with Silicon Valley pretentious SJW type Indians [dot]. Especially the ones that have become fabulously rich beyond their wildest imaginations.

    They themselves couldn’t believe we were so naive and stupid to let them run us over and cackle as we (figuratively) lay bleeding. To give you an idea of what they think of themselves and of us (deplorables), you can take a look here:

    https://en.paperblog.com/racist-elitist-arrogant-indian-man-kanwal-rekhi-by-magneto-1588299/

  48. @jilles dykstra

    What I’m writing about is what Dutchmen who lived in S Africa for decades told me how the country began to change after apartheid ended.

    Did he tell you how it was after the Brits had their way? And who took over the place after that? Again, the politicians that we all see are nothing more than front men and puppets.

    Please read South of Suez, I’m sure you’ll find it useful, interesting and enlightening.

  49. J1234 says:

    As far as Darren Beattie goes, what will Slut say about Al Sharpton appearing at the same rally as the Black Panthers? Absolutely nothing.

    As far as Ilana goes, the left has to invent mythologies about it’s enemies…that’s what orthodoxies do.

    • Replies: @MacNucc11
  50. @jacques sheete

    I do speak logic and sometime facts. I never challenge anybody

  51. BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
    Slate’s Resident Idiot Slanders Jewish Woman — Me

    She must mean that as a compliment. After all, she wouldn’t want to bully anyone, would she?

    Ruining reputations by labeling and libeling unpopular others is all in a day’s work for the bully, who has nothing in his authorial quiver but ad hominem attack.

    Hmmmm. I wonder if she’s aware of the defense mechanism known as projection…

  52. Sean says:
    @anonymous

    If Ms Mercer was interested in sales above principles, she would never have allowed her book to be given that title.

    Hey, professional provocateurs use clickbait.

    They don’t hide behind a pseudonym?

    Ms. Mercer has done so here from time to time, such as once with a glamorous photo that she pathetically tried to suggest was something that Mr. Unz went out somewhere and found.

    Surely not that photo of her in the shower that used to be on her site?
    Perhaps Mr Unz thought to point up the fact that Ilana Mercer is female. I can see why that is such a rarity here.

    The difference between her and a Derbyshire or Weissberg is that she is so often self-referential and purportedly wronged.

    They are men like the authors of 99% of the posts here, while she is a woman (your attitude to her seems to have some curious basis in that fact). Another difference is they lacked faith in Trump, Derbyshire wanted him to use better grammar instead of his practiced rhetorical style. She was right about Trump, early on she said he would win. Trump is self-referential and complaining, in case you have not noticed. Silence is taken as assent.

    It’s embarrassingly transparent.

    It’s clear that she is a woman, mother, does not look like Steve Bannon, knows a thing or two about South Africa, and is defending Trump from an underhanded calumny misrepresenting her views. If she did not refute it who would?

    • Replies: @anonymous
  53. Sean says:
    @JLK

    Trump communicates rather well without using good grammar. It’s called rhetoric.

  54. There are no fucking penniless rabbis.

  55. S says:
    @jacques sheete

    ‘Here [South Africa] the gold is taken from the earth which is then sent to America and reburied, retaining even in its second entombment some magic property which enables it to vitalize or withhold loans and credit operations, to selected political ends, all over the globe. So marvelous a mineral is gold that, the deeper you inter it, the more potent it is. Here in Johannesburg are born martial aid and Marshall Aid, lend-lease and UNRRA, gifts of arms and money alike to the Soviet State and its satellites and to those who may be called on to oppose them.’

    Interesting writing there of Douglass Reed’s. (emphasis mine)

    The below as well. An old truism and sage advice..’Follow the money.’

    ‘A man need but learn who controls the use of the gold to know the secrets of this century.’

  56. renfro says:

    I read the article in Slate…..it says nothing about her being a Jew. So she is playing the Jew Card.

    A few things about little Ms Mercer. She’s racist as they come. Some here like that about her unfortunately.
    Who hasn’t she slandered with the Anti Semite slur? What race or group hasn’t she said was too stupid to run a country.

    And my personal favorite of all time was her :

    In Defense Of Michael Vick, Part 1

    ”Human beings ought to care for and be kind to animals. But a civilized society is one that never threatens a man’s liberty because of the callousness with which he has treated the livestock he owns.”

    Evidently Mercer doesn’t think a civilized society should punish individuals for torture of defenseless animals. So much for her definition of civilized.

    What should Slate have written about Mercer?
    That she’s a rancid junk yard bitch.
    A Jewish supremacy racist.
    That she was born in SA, moved to Israel and brought up there, then moved to America to squat and defecate her crap on our turf .

    Come on out into the comments Mercer and confront us bullies…..come on ….but you wont will you?…. cause you have nothing to stand on but your maggot covered Jewish dung hill…..while we have all your previous articles full of lies and slander of this and that to throw at you.

    • Agree: FB, Druid
    • Replies: @Quebecer
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
  57. FB says:

    LOL…methinks the [Jewish] ‘lady’ doth protest too much…her hateful scribblings here on this unfortunate website are some of the most revolting trash one could imagine…so she gets called out for her virulent racism…what does she expect…that normal people are going to be anything but repulsed by her hate speech…?

    Incidentally, there is a big notice at the top of her wikipedia entry that it is going to be taken down…it seems to be a question of ‘notability’…LOL

    Ron Unz would do well to tie the can to this harpy also…it would help clean up the site from the stormfront crowd…

    • Replies: @Druid
  58. anon[231] • Disclaimer says:
    @TRASH(NOT)

    Our resident Hindoo (apparently a so called “based” one at that) pops out like a weasel with his clockwork about “whiggers”.

    even better is “White Trashionalist” lol – its so clever

    • Replies: @MacNucc11
  59. anon[231] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Alarmist

    Hopefully staying out of it, its affairs, and its interests, as should many in the US.

    why should anyone do that? jews need to be placed under the microscope and judged judged judged, just like they do to others

  60. anon[231] • Disclaimer says:
    @uncle tungsten

    Apartheid is evil wherever it is and many Americans were heroic in their struggle to destroy it in South Africa.

    yes, many (((americans))) were, but oddly those same (((americans))) usually have little to say about israel

    and other Americans were duped by for example Lethal Weapon 2 into believing whatever (((they))) want you to

  61. anon[231] • Disclaimer says:
    @JessicaR

    I always tell my current (mostly white) students to never go out with a man who uses ethnic slurs. I have found that such men are often severe misogynists. By this I don’t mean that they believe women should fill traditional gender roles; rather, that they despise women–except the young, beautiful ones they want to have sex with–and are more likely to be violent.

    wow, your students get plenty of free advice and opinions

  62. Anonymous[370] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Good point.

    There’s no apartheid in SA for a very, very long time. What we have there is a slow-burn (for now) white genocide after the whites were tricked into giving up their power.

    Meanwhile, Israel is a puss-filled, murderous, bleeding sore on the face of humanity since its (((inception))).

    How does “daddy” feel about that? From my point of view, it’s been both fashionable and (reasonably) safe for jews to slow-genocide their white hosts for many decades.

    Not anymore.

  63. Quebecer says:
    @renfro

    Some schoolyard bullies clearly never outgrow their phase.

    Renfro, surely you can make a point without using that kind of language.

    Of course this place allows for frank discussion, but locker room talk should stay there.

    • Agree: Sean
    • Replies: @renfro
  64. anon[231] • Disclaimer says:
    @imbroglio

    Whenever Ilana posts a column here, the Jew bashing quickly begins…

    one mans facts and legitimate questions are another man’s “jew bashing” lol

    take it somewhere else, rabbi

  65. @uncle tungsten

    Was it really evil? The people in charge may have been foolish, but was it evil?
    Was it evil or foolish to allow millions of blacks from the Sahara South to enter and provide a pool of cheap labor? (open borders anyone?) The result of that decision was a massive shift in the already tenuous demographics.
    Was it evil for the the Boers to protect the original inhabitants, the San Xhosa, from the Bantus and Zulus invading from the North? The San Xhosan King has declared independence from South Africa due to the government attacks on Whites, and asked the Whites to stay.
    Were the homelands established by apartheid evil? Even the Zulus recognize the ANC is made up mostly of people who have no long history with the Whites in South Africa. The Zulu King is asking the White farmers to join with them, because they know without the Boer, they will starve to death.

    Call me an anti-Semite if you must, but the one thing Jews have excelled at is stirring the pot to get people fighting each other while they reap the benefit of conflict.

  66. @Sean

    Trump has a stamina of shtaerak.
    I know, I know Wally will be right away here and claim that it is staerak. I am prepared for that.
    Anyway 99.99999999999999 % of men would long time ago fold under pressure the Zionist Globalists and MSM are putting on him. But Trump is going and going like that energizing bunny.

    • Replies: @renfro
  67. @renfro

    I do like Ilana. She is entertaining and she has many valid points. Not all but enough.
    And after all everybody has a right to hers/his opinion.
    Remember what My Lord said: The one without guilt let him throw the first stone.
    Open your heart a little bit.

    • Replies: @renfro
  68. MacNucc11 says:
    @anon

    The big doofus really thinks he is pushing people’s buttons here with that. He must think he is on a White Nationalist site. He needs a little educating. Very few individuals actually consider themselves white nationalists in the truest sense, and I would surmise very few on Unz. Most of us simply don’t like seeing white people continually blamed for every ill of society as is the current fashion. I am also sure he confuses white nationalists with white supremacists as most do in our largely media numbed and dumbed society.

  69. MacNucc11 says:
    @J1234

    I read an interesting article about the Black Panthers. Originally they were a non-violent group who advocated for poor blacks. They were seen as a threat by the deep state because they did not want to see blacks used as pawns as they are today. The FBI used a provocateur to militarize the group which they then took down in a raid where they murdered the leader. Later Malcolm X was assassinated by the deep state just as MLK and JFK were. I believe an innocent man died in jail for the killing of MLK and we all know LHO was a set up. Same old pattern you see again and again.
    I am curious, should the Black Panthers be concerned about being at a rally with Al Sharpton or vice versa? I must confess ignorance regarding Al Sharpton. I only know he made some spot on comments about Obama. I actually didn’t know the Black Panthers still exist. If they do it can be assumed they are a fully funded and managed organization such as ISIS, Al quada, etc.

    • Replies: @niteranger
  70. Che Guava says:

    Ilana.

    You should find a more consistent and believable narrative’than muh poor dear rabbi pappy and me wuz so poor’, it is so false. Does your dear ole rabbi pappy still live in Seth Efrica? Don’t believe it. You both ran away to Israel, remember? If rabbi pappy went back to and is living in Suid Afrique, which I doubt, but you claim, the only purpose would be to tip people into the cannibal’s pot.

    Yet you claim that your rabbi pappy does just that in this article.

    I would expect that he is still in Israel.

    You may more closely consider the lack of logic and clear cognitive dissonance in your own writing, if you are capable of such.

  71. renfro says:
    @Quebecer

    Renfro, surely you can make a point without using that kind of language.

    I only use profanity in special cases like this one.

  72. renfro says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Open your heart a little bit.

    In this case that would be like the spider inviting the fly into his web.
    No thanks.

  73. Thomm says:
    @TRASH(NOT)

    LOL! I have beaten up this long-time commenter so badly that the coward uses a new handle (as evidenced by the low commenting history).

    He could scarcely broadcast his cowardice and defeat so heavily. Nothing could make this wastematter creature (i.e. not a member of the functional white race) look worse.

    LOL! ….

    This is even before getting to the point that no one with an IQ of 75 or higher could possibly think I am Indian. It is just a pain avoidance mechanism for white trashionalists (who are really just waste matter that the functional white race wants to expel from the gene pool) when reminded that successful white people want to eradicate them.

    Heh heh heh heh ….

    • Replies: @TRASH(NOT)
  74. Wally says:
    @tac

    Slavery of black Africans would have never happened in the first place without black Africans selling their own black African slaves first.

    African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade, Nigerian civil rights group says tribal leaders’ ancestors sold people to slavers and should say sorry: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade
    “African chiefs were the ones waging war on each other and capturing their own people and selling them. If anyone should apologise it should be the African chiefs. We still have those traitors here even today.”

    And indeed, Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let’s us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade

    • Replies: @anon
  75. Like the recent whine about a daughter who lied to US immigration and got herself banned from the country, nobody gives a shit about your petty feuds with other professional victims. And playing the “poor me, a jewess” card is absolutely pathetic.

    “Waaah, nobody worships me because my sky fairy is better than theirs! Waaah, Slate is a bunch of anti-semites.” And mostly, “Waaah, my sexual market value is zero.”

    Dear YHWH, old women with pruned ovaries are annoying with their whining about the unfairness of the world (to them)..

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Quebecer
  76. Tod says:

    I see where this is going, and there’s only one correct answer to the question. That answer is: If you are Jewish you should stay the hell away from any from any topics involving: Israel, Palestine, BDS, apartheid, pedophilia, organ stealing, forced sterilization, racism, USA politics.
    All of the above topics have been so thoroughly tainted by helpful Jews, or plain racist Jews, that no one in it’s right mind will risk to be burned again, hoping that: “No really, I’m a Jew, but different, vote Bernie Sanders!” or “I’m a Jew, and I believe in Wikileaks, I just happened to blow up the whole operation!”
    Supposing you are a human being that actually wants to do some good for the human race, and not one of the usual Jewish racist plats (meaning, “I’ll help your cause, until something remotely bad could happen to a fellow Jew”), there are plenty of humanitarian causes that could use your effort.

  77. anonymous[739] • Disclaimer says:
    @imbroglio

    I think Unz review should have more edited comments like Amren.

    Yeah, straight forward Jew bashing isn’t helpful, educational or entertaining.

    I think Unz should allow some honest commentary on the JQ – like presenting the facts about the various country and religious changes Clinton’s Serb hating Sec. of State Madeline Albright made:

    Madeleine Albright

    @madeleine
    Follow Follow @madeleine
    More
    I was raised Catholic, became Episcopalian & found out later my family was Jewish. I stand ready to register as Muslim in #solidarity.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @TRASH(NOT)
  78. Ilana, you’ve got to give up your scribblings. It is time for you to go to Israel. Israel needs you. When you go back, take the sophist Jew (((Molyneux))) with you. He’s now attempting to re-write the West’s history.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpAyTjt_JzA The first two minutes are the most interesting.

    The West is not black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim. You can opine all you want, but you will be ignored in the West.

  79. anon[390] • Disclaimer says:
    @Stan d Mute

    And playing the “poor me, a jewess” card is absolutely pathetic.

    this is what bothered me.

    she’s a member of the wealthiest, most privileged group on the planet so why should i feel sorry for her?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  80. anon[390] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade, Nigerian civil rights group says tribal leaders’ ancestors sold people to slavers and should say sorry: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade
    “African chiefs were the ones waging war on each other and capturing their own people and selling them. If anyone should apologise it should be the African chiefs. We still have those traitors here even today.”

    they all want to blame everything on whites

    whites are the only group that has any shame

  81. Quebecer says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Sir, i think that with this comment you have reached a new low, plumbing new depths of tastelesness.

    So you attack the author’s looks ? I think that the only way you’d get close to someone who looks as good as she does would be to get caught in a hostage taking

    • Agree: Sean
  82. schrub says:

    It was a long time ago, least 10 or 15 years, that I first encountered Iliana Mercer writing on another site. She, like now, was pretending to be a classical liberal with libertarian inclinations. At first, I thought highly of her but then something happened that revealed an entirely different side of her.

    During one of these sessions, one of the other writers, a very clever and droll fellow who loved to bait Iliana about what he thought was her faux persona, wrote a comment that must have touched a very sensitive nerve in her because she suddenly seemed to go absolutely bat shi-t crazy. She started commenting wildly claiming antisemitism and then started to curse the other person with a racist, ad hominem viciousness that old Abe Foxman of the ADL or a strict Hasidic rabbi would have envied. Other clever commenters then started to join in this kerfuffle against her which made her even crazier.

    Then she lost all restraint. She proceeded to make it perfectly clear during the ensuing outbursts that she wasn’t just attacking just the single commenter but goys in general. Her utter contempt for gentiles had inadvertently come out into the wide open.

    Her meltdown was so extreme and vicious that she immediately lost all credibility on the site. I think she might have been kicked off it as a result.

    Maybe her comments had then made her such a hot potato among her controllers that even they had become wary of her for admitting what she felt (and they also felt) out among the common plebes.

    Her posting name vanished for an extended period of time, over a decade. It has taken all this time for all this to blow over and allow her to reappear, writing under her real name.

    Iliana is not only rabidly pro Israel but is also an extreme Jewish supremacist. Everything that she writes about should be treated with extreme skepticism.

    Best advice: She is a fake. Believe nothing that she writes.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  83. @MacNucc11

    Al Sharpton has been an FBI informant for years. The Blacks are too stupid to understand his game plan. He has ratted a number of “brothers” out over the years. He owes a ton of money to the IRS and yet they do nothing! I suggest you try this and see what happens to you. He invented “shaking down” businesses or the blacks would protest and riot. He has made this method into an art form. He was Obama’s Right Hand Man for blacks because Obama hates Jesse Jackson.

    He is one of the greatest cons, race pimps, race hustlers and parasites in history yet the dim witted black populace love him. He is ripping them off and they just keep coming back for more.

  84. TGGP says: • Website

    I expect that most scholars would regard South Africa as a democracy, even though it’s a good rule of thumb to say that democratic status is proved when a regime peacefully steps down after losing an election (which is basically what happened when Mandela was first elected). At the same time, there are many countries with what are called natural governing parties (wikipedia uses the term “dominant-party system“), like the PRI in Mexico, Liberal Democrats in Japan or Liberal Party in Canada. All of them actually have lost power & stepped down in my lifetime, although that came after ruling for decades. Singapore has been ruled by one party throughout its entire existence. This is usually pointed to as an indication that it’s not a democracy at all, but I’ve heard the response that many cities are effectively one-party states (in America that seems due to people forming their political identities at a national level and Democrats clustering in cities). Another such country is Russia, though that’s become unpopular enough with liberals that I think many would agree it’s not a democracy (even if some might believe Putin really is popular enough that he would win a fair contest).

  85. renfro says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Anyway 99.99999999999999 % of men would long time ago fold under pressure the Zionist Globalists and MSM are putting on him. But Trump is going and going like that energizing bunny

    Yep, he’s banging away doing exactly what they tell him to do.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Sean
  86. @Fidelios Automata

    Ohh stop being silly.

    it’s referred to as linguistic manipulation. In which one takes a term intended for offense and uses to a different end.

    Women can and do refer to each other as “b’. But If I were to do so the contextualize meaning would be interpreted as offensive.

    No more the same thing two friends who berate each other all day long , you join in on the exchange and find that you are an offense.

    The social bindings are just not similar. It is not the same thing.

  87. He he!
    You are certainly highly intelligent. Also smart. But you look at everything as being played, and so phony. For you nothing is real.
    I just do not think so. There must be some reality somewhere.
    I really do like Trump, but now I wish that Trump will get impeached so I can then point out to you that you are wrong.

    • Replies: @Sean
  88. RI says:

    I did not understand which part makes you so angry – the Idiot, that the Idiot Slanders someone, that the Idiot Slanders a Jewish, or that the Idiot Slanders a Woman? Which part is the most special to pay attention to?

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
  89. @Fidelios Automata

    linguistic manipulation = symbolic manipulation

  90. @Thomm

    “Beating” me?? Ahahahahaha!! You sure need some good ol fashioned beat down Thomm.

    Btw I have something for you, you heap of (holy) cow dung (cake). Go and ask your butt buddy Jeff about this moniker. It sure will be a good after (butt) sex conversation topic for the both of you!

    • Replies: @Thomm
  91. John Done says:
    @JessicaR

    ‘I have found that such men are often severe misogynists ‘

    ‘ Name-calling is the mark of someone who is uneducated, troubled, or just plain mean ‘

    So , which one are you?

    uneducated?
    troubled?
    or just plain mean?

  92. @anon

    Take away the money they get from the idiot Christian Zionists and the US government and their fortunes will change.

  93. @schrub

    It doesn’t bother me that she’s rabidly pro-Israel or she believes in Jewish supremacy. What is more important is for Westerners to remind her that modern day Jews are not the chosen and are not related to the Jews of the Old Testament and when Jesus lived. Also, they are not the smartest tribe ever and did not contribute anything to the development of the West. They are a miscegenated bunch. She can be as rabid and supreme as she wants to be in Israel.

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @jilles dykstra
  94. Thomm says:
    @TRASH(NOT)

    LOL! You were so destroyed when I beat you up last, that you can’t even comment under the same handle. You put forth a new handle just to try to be a mosquito here.

    If you had human levels of intelligence, you would see how loudly you have broadcast your own loserdom.

    Heh heh heh heh

    You are not a functional member of the white race. That is why we are trying to eradicate waste matter like you, which is nature’s directive.

    Get off my lawn, faggot!

    • Replies: @James Scott
    , @TRASH(NOT)
  95. tac says:
    @Reactionary Utopian

    So, I presume I was the exemplar to your faux wrath….the TRUTH dispensed (did you even examine what I’ve posted …. of course not you light-weight) is anti-semitic gleamed with lyin’ Elise Wiesel’s eyesight …. you certainly seem just like a weasel …. care to DISPUTE any of my statements, or are you simply a faux/pseudo intellectual without ANY BASIS whatsoever to refute these claims …. waiting for your non-answer the ADL has NO ANSWER to the truth dispensed, all they can do is jail people for disagreeing with their will accusations ….. .if you have no factual rebuttal do crawl back into your obscurity…time will tell…waiting……

  96. Lin says:

    I usually don’t comment on such issues nor I want to judge Ilana Mercer based on these matters but certainly rhetorics are over-stretched here:
    ” Cannibalism serves merely as metaphor in my book”
    A few entries of mine:
    —Jews are said to be the ‘chosen people’–Metaphor or hard fact ?
    —Jesus is the only begotten Son of God—Metaphor or hard fact ?
    — Jack said to Jane: “You’re a real bitch”–Jack meant benign metaphor or Jane is a biological canine ?
    ………………..
    Seems people must be reminded that images and metaphors are an integral and important part of human languages and are guilded missiles carrying warheads of emotion homed to supposedly hot spots or vulnerabilities

  97. Rogue says:
    @Reactionary Utopian

    I agree.

    There is one thing I’d like to point out though, and that is the bit where Ilana spoke about how she helped a Black domestic back in the Apartheid days.

    Umm, lots of Whites did that, whether they were liberal or conservative. Whether they supported Apartheid or not. Knowing people personally is always going to be different to viewing another whole ethnicity as just “them”.

    But I generally do like Ilana’s writing. (And Fred’s).

  98. Sean says:
    @attilathehen

    Did you read the post? In order to discredit Trump through his former speechwriter, Slate are screaming that Ilana Mercer is a racist, and yet you cannot see whose side you are in effect on when you try and bully her off this site as a racist. But of course the people who don’t like Mercer also oppose Trump, and so when Mercer defends Trump that just makes her an easier target.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  99. Sean says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Renfro would apply his standard technique of analysis, not “Who benefits?” but “Jew benefits” and assume the whole thing was arranged by Mossad to trick him. Cognitive dissonance makes him believe everyone is fake so he himself feels real. People like renfro perceive themselves as persecuted by the certainty of other people, none more so than that Ilana was an early and stalwart supporter of Trump.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    , @renfro
  100. Realist says:
    @anonymous

    I think Unz review should have more edited comments like Amren.

    Amren over edits it reader comments making it pretty much an ineffectual site. What’s the point of having edited comments??

    • Replies: @Sean
  101. @attilathehen

    The problem is that some jews really seem to think that they’re chosen:
    Israel Shahak, ‘Jewish History, Jewish Religion, The Weight of Three Thousand Years’, 1994, 2002, London

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  102. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean

    “If Ms Mercer was interested in sales above principles, she would never have allowed her book to be given that title.”

    Oh, so the racebait title was within the “publisher’s purview,” too? Are you sure? She seems quite proud of it in this article. Scroll up and read it again:

    “The origin of the title is expressly and unambiguously explained in the Introduction. [more]”

    Maybe you fellas should just let “Jewish Woman — Me” dissemble for herself. She can do that when she answers my first question in comment #2: How much do you think this outrage will affect the sales of your book?

    • Replies: @Sean
  103. @Sean

    I do agree with you. And everybody deserves to have a little breathing space.
    I can see some people are totally convinced that Jews are totally monolithic people.
    That is a little bit childish.

  104. Sean says:
    @Realist

    No point. Better to ban a few, then the others will edit their own comments and cease to swamp and disrupt comment threads rather than make cogent comments.

    • Replies: @Rogue
    , @Realist
    , @tac
  105. Sean says:
    @anonymous

    How much do you think this outrage will affect the sales of your book?

    The book is being misrepresented as discreditable in Slate, which is a mainstream media trusted by many millions. Mercer also has multiple pages attacking her at THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER website.

    Even a sympathetic reviewer at Alternative Right said that title would cost her sales. She was referencing Ayn Rand. Slate misrepresented what both meant to tangentally smear Trump and she was defending him, which you object to without saying how she is misrepresenting what the title meant. You don’t like Trump and you are attacking her and him, so there is no question which side you are on in effect. And you have many powerful allies, because most Jews are over there with you.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @anonymous
  106. renfro says:
    @Sean

    Yep, I am asking myself right now who benefits from your erroneous claim that ‘all’ my complaints are centered on the Jews…hummm?

    I am the least persecuted person I know as all the issues here …race, Jews, etc….have no effect on my life or me personally.
    Any angst I have is for the late great USA, now devoid of all common sense.

    I haven’t decided yet if I’m going to feel sorry for those like you who cling to the false hope that Trump will re order the US and world the way you want him to and grant your every wish. Or just say ‘I told you so’.

    One thing I was and am certain of is that both Trump and Hillary sheep who vote on whatever narrow issue they are obsessed with ; the wall, blacks, etc for the right and gays and minorities for the left are The Problem.

    • Replies: @Sean
  107. @Thomm

    I’m a salesman. I meet a lot of people. I am really good with words and know how to steer conversations in any direction without it seeming like it.

    I get white men to say white nationalist things every single workday. Its easy and fun. I also get blacks to badmouth wetbacks and vice versa everyday.

    If you are a white man your views are in the minority. White people are snapping out of it fast.

    • Replies: @Liza
  108. Art Deco says:

    He seems to have dropped out of school ca. 2004 and had one job after another at punchy outlets (New York, BuzzFeed). That’s pretty much his adult work history. He’s not paid to know anything. He’s paid to get copy in on time and be ‘clever’ and ‘edgy’.

  109. Rogue says:
    @Sean

    No point. Better to ban a few, then the others will edit their own comments and cease to swamp and disrupt comment threads rather than make cogent comments.

    There I must disagree with you.

    I find the comment section at Unz generally quite engaging and informative. Obviously, there will always be exceptions.

    As opposed to the comment section at Amren, which I find stale and generally pretty shallow.

    I’ve left a couple of comments at Amren that weren’t published. Whether by accident or the mods didn’t like what I was saying, I couldn’t say.

    But what I’d written could no way possible have been deemed offensive or rude or anything remotely like that. Therefore, it is simply possible they didn’t like what I had to say (about former Rhodesia and South Africa).

    So while I will still visit Amren (I have tremendous respect for Jared Taylor), I can’t generally be bothered to leave comments much anymore.

    The comments section at Unz is far superior. It should stay the way it is.

  110. Sean says:

    If I remember correctly they reserve the right to hold opponents to lower standards. It’s a tactic, but one that sometimes creates a vulnerability. Supposing a site comments were attracting the attention of swarms of people for who it is a full time job to monomaniacally bring up one aspect of criticism on any site that lets them post it, and the world sees them, not as opponents but rather supporters of the website.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
  111. Sean says:
    @renfro

    You sound pathologically ambivalent, I think you overthink others and feel ontological angst as a result. Through being adversely affected by the certitudes of the average person, so you have come to believe in an alternative certainty. Trump is very sure of himself, but he also puts up a front inasmuch he always knows he is rolling the dice. In other words, he is confident in a definite decision taken under conditions of risk.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
    , @renfro
  112. crimson2 says:

    lol, slander. You racist garbage are always whining. File a lawsuit so I can laugh my ass off when you lose.

  113. Anon[411] • Disclaimer says:

    Some hope

    OPEN SOURCE IS FREE SPEECH! A CONVERSATION WITH BILL OTTMAN, CEO OF MINDS.COM

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/2zIIr7APfp8/

  114. Realist says:
    @Sean

    No point. Better to ban a few, then the others will edit their own comments and cease to swamp and disrupt comment threads rather than make cogent comments.

    That is censorship plain and simple. Who are you to decide what is cogent??? You sound like a snowflake lib.

  115. @Thomm

    Hay Uncle tom tom, heres to your “official” recognition by Unz himself.

    http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/of-course-harvard-discriminates-against-asians/#comment-2112122

    Again, hearty congratulations for being noticed. As they say, no such thing as bad publicity ;)!

  116. @Sean

    Matthis-Lilley is a functionally, illiterate soyboy – a typical Slate male writer. He’s just scribbling nonsense because he’s part of the Fake News media. He’s too stupid and lazy to do any real investigating.

    Darren Beattie was fired by some cuck in the Trump and replaced by a Dalit – Raj Shah. https://vdare.com/articles/raj-shah-in-darren-beattie-out-no-wonder-trump-faces-mid-term-catastrophe

    I voted for Trump and so far he’s done a good job, except for immigration. He has cucked on this.

    Whether someone believes (((Mercer))) is a racist or not, is not important to me. We know she’s a groid lover. Her support and defense of Trump is irrelevant. She is irrelevant because she’s a Jewess and must go to Israel. We need Western nationalists defending Trump.

  117. @jilles dykstra

    I don’t care if they think they are chosen, it’s what we think and know that’s important. That 3000 history is bunk. Again, it’s the idiot Christian Zionists and the RCC who promote their choseness.

  118. @imbroglio

    It’s not Jew-bashing, it’s truth-telling. I used to read and post comments at Takimag. I was shocked by the idiot anti-Semites who constantly yammer about the Jews, but when I would ask them where should we put the Jews, they would never respond. Mr. Taki is an anti-Semite and after an article he wrote, I asked him directly where should we put the Jews. He didn’t answer, but another commentator couldn’t believe I would ask him such a question. My solution is repatriation to Israel.

    What I found about the commentators was that many were cucks, gentile/Jewish males involved with Asian females, and trad Roman Catholics – or some combination thereof. Whenever I criticized Asians, particularly the females, I would get called fat, old, jealous, a lesbian or some other nonsense. I don’t care if Jews marry Asians, but if a Western male gets involved with Asian females, that’s a huge problem. John Derbyshire is exhibit A of what happens to a Western male involved with Asian dragon women.

    The trad RCCers would get furious when I would state that black/Asian priests-popes are unacceptable and that we need a new church for the West.

    Nothing is going to happen to Ilana. She has Israel. We only the West and must defend it.

    • Replies: @Anon
  119. @anonymous

    Ah is she the same old hag that said killing a million plus babies in Iraq was worth it? That collateral damage in Iraq, Serbia et all is nothing to be bothered about. It is due to parasites like these that we can not extricate ourselves out of that sandbox called the middle east. Our men die there while they sell out our country to the brown horde piece by piece. Go to edison, dearborn or sunnyvale if you don’t believe me

    I wonder what these men think about that? Those grunts who put their lives on the line so that their country could be split up and sold to the highest bidder

    I think these people should be exposed for what they really are, which is not all that difficult with the internet (which is why these folks are so intent on “banning” parts of it). Christians of the old had the sense to keep these folks on the leash. Look where “secularism” got us

    • Agree: anarchyst
  120. Anon[661] • Disclaimer says:

    When I read the words Slate, slander, Jewish woman in the same sentence I was sure it was a joke — a peculiar one at that.
    Then I finished the sentence and it turned out to be believable.

    Anyone saying some truth can be slandered: even a Jewish woman by Slate, it seems.

  121. Anon[661] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    On what basis would you repatriate the Jews to Israel, whilst keeping all the others where they are now (even “Heritage America” is multiracial in composition)?

    “Because they are too ethnocentric, wilful, intelligent, and ended up controlling a lot of the culture business state administration, and we want to do it and we can’t do it if we don’t give them the boot”.

    Have you ever read that Paris happened to be the world’s cultural and political centre when it was Jewry’s centre, that the same happened later as to London, and once again with New York?

    Ever read about the Manhattan Project? Had Hitler not broke relations with Jewry, he’d probably have been the first to lay hands on the atom bomb = won the war.

    And wouldn’t the USA be far less influential, without Google, Facebook, Hollywood, …?

    Give-and-take accounts are often hard to make with a clear mind.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  122. @Anon

    Get rid of dual-citizenship in the USA. This will get rid of most of the Jews and other groups.

    Hollywood is gone. 99% of the movies are multi-culti, tits and ass, blood and gore trash. Haven’t you noticed that few movies make any money. The only movies which make money are those that appeal to the low IQers, i.e., Fast and Furious. Once in a while they will make a decent movie for all ages.

    The alt-tech is coming up with new platforms. Facebook is collapsing. People are finally realizing that most of social media is a waste of time. Also, I’m reading more articles about how tech executives in Silicon Valley do not allow their children to use computers, tablets, etc.

    Jews only takeover when the gentiles allow them. Also, I don’t blame the Jews for these supposed takeovers. I always look behind the Jews and see Catholics and Freemasons causing problems. E. Michael Jones blames the Jews for everything. He said that it was the 1964 movie “The Pawnbroker” with its nude scene that caused our movie porn problem. No, it was Vittorio De Sica’s movie “The Bicycle Thief” which challenged US censors in 1949. http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/68597/The-Bicycle-Thief/articles.html De Sica was an Italian Catholic. Nothing Jewish about him. Jones tries to blame the porn problem on Jews. The porn problem started with the Marquis de Sade, a French Catholic. Nothing Jewish about him. There’s always been porn. We see it turn up in archaeology excavations. However, it could not be mass-produced until the printing press was invented.

    Also, the Jews can only copy. The philosophical, theological systems in the West had nothing to do with the Jews. Also, today’s Jews are now an Afro-Asiatic people because of their high intermarriage rates with blacks/Asians. Mark Zuckerberg and his Chinese wife and (((Chloe Green)), the Topshop heiress and her black, ex-felon soon to be husband are the faces of modern Jewry. Nothing Western here.

    As to Hitler and the bomb, I’ve read that the Nazis were working on their own atomic weapons. That’s why the USA and Russia were in the race to capture the German scientists. We got them in Operation Paperclip.

    Again, the Jews are not the problem. It is the RCC and the insane Zioevangizers who are causing our problems. Along with getting rid of the Jews, the RCC will have to be reorganized. There can be no black/Asian priests-popes in the West. The Christian Zionists will have to have their insane theology constantly challenged and repudiated. I watch RCC and Zioevangizer programs. They are both nuts.

    We are undergoing a new paradigm shift in the West. The world has been mapped, settled, IQs measured. We can divide people according to races. We know IQ is the most important objective truth there is. We know the West is not black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim. There will be no white flight to Mars, the moon. The blue marble is it. We need to save the Western part of the blue marble. Think of this, we get rid of dual citizenship and we get rid of a lot of people. We give blacks their own states and crime rates will drop dramatically. The Chinese and East Indians will have to go back and we will get control of our schools and universities. We must teach that the West is best. By teaching that the West is best because of Western populations, people who aren’t Western or refuse to assimilate if they can, will go away. Little steps will cascade into big changes.

    But, again, it will be the RCCers and Zioevangizers who will try to cause problems. Fortunately, most are cucks so they won’t be a problem.

    Getting rid of the evil, oxymoronic universal brotherhood belief is the first step.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  123. tac says:
    @Sean

    No point. Better to ban a few

    Said in a real neo-nazi point-of-view…. I’ve ALWAYS had this feeling about you …. now you’ve proved it once and for all.

    Even though I disagree with much of your commentary, I would NEVER advocate for banning your POV ….

    funny how that works …. who is really the repressor here …. not need to answer this rhetorical question ….

  124. Druid says:
    @FB

    I cant be what they my FATHER is a rabbi who opposed apartheid. So now that apatyheid in SAfrica is no more, why are they here and not there. The jews were the first to bolt when apartheid ended. And raped the country!

  125. Them Guys says:
    @Sean

    You just described those 250,000 Israeli Mossad Paid, Jewish internet Talkbackers. Jews in every nation and location, Trained and Paid to seek out every possible poster, on every online forum that has posted any info critical of Israel and or Jews. Then to quickly join forum, pretend to be just another normal avg individual poster person, and to then post up nothing else but a totally pro Israel and Pro Jewish type reply response. If any should get banned?…They’d be a good start. I am against all censorship, except for actual threats of harm etc….But if someone just must be banned as you seem to think, make it a ban on all such Mossad trained and paid talkbacker Jews.

    PS: I wont bother to look up and post here the many links of proof that Israeli Govnt and Mossad are doing this…Since I have prior posted such links and Wally here has posted tons of such proof links, and done so often. Seems nothing is too Low and without limits as to how far Jews will go, eh. Then they Brag of it all endlessly, then when non Jew goys find it out and warn or alert others to these nefarious Jewish methods and out right Lies…The same braggart Jews return to scream Nazi Antisemite! Oy Vey!

    • Replies: @Sean
  126. Them Guys says:
    @Sean

    Trump is so confident, his tweets change hour by hour. Depending on who was his last visitor in his office at Whitehouse. Example..Mon 9am..first tweet of day, Trump alerts everybody he just bought new dress shoes for his soon inspections of Illegal Invader alien Tents to be built instead of a Wall.

    10 am mon, 2nd tweet of day…Jewish Daughter and Co-US-Prez Ivanka #1 Main us Prez advisor just left the room, and now Trump tweets how he so hates dress shoes and is buying new tennis shoes…..11 am mon 3rd tweet of day…Son in law and Co-US-Prez based from his main home shared with Ivanka in Israel, phoned in his advise, and as Co-us-Prez told Trump open toe sandals look much nicer when at new Tent City for Illegal alien Invader hoards….so Trumps 11 am mon tweet alerts the nation about how he hates tennis shoes worse than dress shoes and is proud to say he’s going to wear Sandals instead!

    Sure shows confidence in decisions, no….Confident on decisions made based upon whom was last visitor so far during daily briefings.

    • Agree: renfro
    • Replies: @Sean
  127. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean

    Sean (#53): “If Ms Mercer was interested in sales above principles, she would never have allowed her book to be given that title.”

    Sean (#107): “Even a sympathetic reviewer at Alternative Right said that title would cost her sales. She was referencing Ayn Rand.”

    I’m the one and only anonymous[340].

    But is there more than one “Sean”?

  128. @attilathehen

    #1 credo of Jews is this: If it sells and make profit we go with it.
    There is nothing wrong with this credo.
    But if these kind of people assume power in the state (totally disregarding consequence of their actions}, than the people of the state are in trouble.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  129. Sean says:
    @Them Guys

    I wonder if it is that easy to identity who is who. The 9/11 conspiracy theory comments had getting on for a thousand about … well take a look at this 1995 Illuminati conspiracy board game card.


    I suppose Israel is mainly worried about the mainstream, but I suppose they can spare one or two people to come here. And yet if it was going to try and disrupt comment threads it seems to me it would be more effective to promote, not straight out pro Israel or pro Jewish viewpoints, but rather insane, puerile and preposterous anti-Semitic ones. That is what I meant about seeming to be on the side that you are trying to destroy. Then again there are always people who if given free reins will take things so far that they end up as having the opposite effect to what they intend. So maybe the Jewish method is to just let their opponents get disrupted by their own sincere commenters.

    The extreme minority taking over a comments thread can wreck everything the author of the post was trying to do by agreeing with it in an increasingly unreasonably way, that more or less what happened at the 9/11 conspiracy thread even though everyone there agreed the discussion overheated. Some of the more wild eyed stuff was from people who did not seem to have anything else to do with their time. And the thread fell into their hands because everyone else got bored and discouraged. So I do not think anyone needs to spend time blowing up threads, there are plenty of defective people with mental problems who are at a loose end and happy to do it for free.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  130. Sean says:
    @Them Guys

    There is something to be said for all those types of footwear. Different people see different sides of an issue, and Trump is no dogmatist.

  131. Liza says:
    @James Scott

    James, why would you want to manipulate people? It’s slimy to do that. Even for salesmen.

  132. KD says:

    I remember Bret Weinstein talking about the “slurs” against him over is opposition to Evergreen College. He was right! Ilana Mercer needs to understand the rhetorical effect needed because enough people will not look at context or facts. “Racist” is now being used as a slur intended to discredit someone rather than an objective “good-call” on a person’s character and actions.

    This is simply a role reversal on racial/ethnic slurs, for example “he’s just a filthy whop, don’t listen to him.” It’s a simple dismissal.

  133. renfro says:
    @Sean

    You sound pathologically ambivalent, I think you overthink others and feel ontological angst as a result. Through being adversely affected by the certitudes of the average person, so you have come to believe in an alternative certainty.

    I am a realist.
    You otoh appear to be an average minus guy with a dictionary who lives vicariously thru your hero Trump.
    Trump is confident because he suffers from the Dunning–Kruger effect, a cognitive bias in which people of low ability have illusory superiority and mistakenly assess their cognitive ability as greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority comes from the inability of low-ability people to recognize their lack of ability. Without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence.
    Iow, If you’re incompetent, you can’t know you’re incompetent … The skills you need to produce right solutions are exactly the skills you need to recognize what the reality is.
    Your ‘certitude’ about Trump comes from the same problem as his does.

    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Replies: @Sean
    , @anon
  134. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Again, it is the cuck Western male who is allowing this to happen. Universal brotherhood/church are what is destroying the West. Until the Western male deals with these 2 evils, we will have a difficult time trying to save the West. We will triumph, but, we need to deal with the cucked Western male first.

  135. ILANA MERCER a typical jewish sjw, who is too good to do anything bad like call someone names because she’s a rabbi’s daughter — usually the worst, but most sanctimonious. loves the holocaust lies, hates everyone who isn’t a jew but hides it in public and in her writings, very likely holds two passports making her a dual citizen which is unlawful according to the US Constitution, but law means nothing to jews for they live by the talmud while masquerading as if they live by the ‘Torah’, etc.
    when jews stop being victims, and get out of everyone’s lives & nations, then and only then, will this world know peace and prosperity.

  136. Sean says:
    @renfro

    Trump is confident because he suffers from the Dunning–Kruger effect.

    No one is an expert on themselves to the extent they can see their own weaknesses because what we use to judge ourself is part of that same self. As an outsider Trump could look at the political sytem and see the establishment that were out of touch with their actual situation. Mercer could too.

    The skills you need to produce right solutions are exactly the skills you need to recognize what the reality is.

    You could have got odds of 100:1 for Trump becomeing president when he decided to run. That was reality, but only a reality. Another was his confidence in his abilities and willingness to put it to the test, and win or lose it all. Yes, heroes often fail, but they cannot hope to win if they don’t dare try!

    Even Donald Trump did not know if he would win the Presidency. If he had lost after giving them a populist fright, they would have used state agencies to ruin him and quite possibly jail him, so it was it was risky to try. He had ultimate Skin in the Game as Nassim Taleb puts it. The reality was Trump had the skills to win, though no one knew it, Trump was closer to the truth than anyone
    about the country and the way it was declining relative to China, because of the elite’s treachery.

    So he stepped forward.

    http://www.unz.com/imercer/trumps-invisible-poor-white-armys-waiting-on-the-ropes/

    Mercer was the only person here who was sanguine about Trump’s prospects from the begining. It seems to me the people you are criticizing as incompetent get things right even if they don’t comprehend why. Maybe your kind of armchair rationality is overrated.

  137. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Sean

    Three buildings falling down on the same day did it for me. In particular, WTC 7 free falling on video from a fire!!

    That, and what happened after, pointed to the culprits.

    Cui bono??

    You truly have to be insane to believe the conventional fairy tale.

    We are dealing with a monstrous evil.

  138. anon[311] • Disclaimer says:
    @renfro

    Trump is confident because he suffers from the Dunning–Kruger effect, a cognitive bias in which people of low ability have illusory superiority and mistakenly assess their cognitive ability as greater than it is.

    yes, the “low ability” billionaire

    where would you place him the scale – cretin, moron, or retard?

    • Replies: @JLK
  139. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean

    Calling all Seans! Calling all Seans!

    Did she allow the title, or did she choose it?

    Sean (#53): “If Ms Mercer was interested in sales above principles, she would never have allowed her book to be given that title.”

    Sean (#107): “Even a sympathetic reviewer at Alternative Right said that title would cost her sales. She was referencing Ayn Rand.”

    Ms. Mercer, please feel free to pull Sean out of the pot.

    • Replies: @Sean
  140. @Sean

    Trump repeats himself very often, but I’ll bet he does so on purpose. Repetition is a rhetorical device to allow his mind time to consider the next point he wants to make.

    • Replies: @Sean
  141. JLK says:
    @anon

    There seems to be a taboo against politicians releasing their college transcripts and SAT scores or having them discussed in the media. Even when the scores were likely very high (Bill Clinton for example) and would make the candidate look smart.

    This information would be as useful to voters as the results of a medical check-up, one would think.

    The best we can do in Trump’s case is guess, but not too many rich kids who ace their college boards go to Fordham.

  142. Sean says:
    @anonymous

    As far as I am aware Ilana Mercer is now almost totally an internet columnist without any syndication or book deal agent to pressure her into a less challenging title, so I would suspect that she was free to chose that title or allow it because she was not desperate for sales, and surely was not anticipating the the way it was used to attribute the discreditable views now being attributed to her in Slate. I cannot see any of this as welcome to her. I comment on her posts far less than other authors as there is not that she says I disagree with, and the comments are overly dominated by off topic animadversion.

  143. Sean says:
    @Simply Simon

    Trump alludes to his point rather than making it directly. Maybe he should explain the difference between metaphor and analogy to Slate.

  144. anonymous[739] • Disclaimer says:

    I greatly admire and appreciate Miss Ilana Mercer’s writing and activism – feel that she has presented the realities of the rough life in South Africa after the collapse of White rule.

    I request that editors here get stricter on editing comments, not complete censorship – more like Amren’s policies of not allowing open Jew hating comments.

    I’m disappointed Takimag doesn’t allow any comments which were once the best section.

    Thanks Miss Ilana Mercer – you wrote/write the truth as you’ve seen it.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  145. Thanks for the article. I agree wholeheartedly with your position, and I greatly admire your courage and consistency.

    My only little quibble with your article is with the inaccuracy – dare I call it libel? – concerning the Mathers. It was Cotton and his father who helped end the witchcraft trials. Increase Mather told the General Court that the devil can slander even the most devout saint with scurrilous half-truths and lies. Taking the word of self-interested pick-thanks is hardly prudent or reasonable.

    Sounds like you may have personal knowledge of this sad fact.

    Keep up the great work!

  146. Aeopole says:
    @anon

    He doesnt live there. This would be like asking me, an American what I plan to do for Germany because we share a kinship.

    • Replies: @anon
  147. @anonymous

    “…the realities of the rough life in South Africa after the collapse of White rule…” were caused by the anti-apartheid work of her and her rabbi father. She writes and does things from a Jewish perspective, i.e., anti-Western. The West is not black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim. She has no idea of “truth.”

  148. anon[641] • Disclaimer says:
    @Aeopole

    if you’ve just demonstrated and spoken out against apartheid in your home country for years and years and then you as a German noticed that the country of your ancestors engaged in apartheid as well, you’d say nothing?

    i suspect you’d be perceived as quite the hypocrite

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.