The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Multiculturalism Elbows Anglo-Americans Out
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

America is “a society that is and always has been multiethnic and polyglot,” burbled David Frum, in a 2016 exposition. It’s a refrain repeated by centrists like Frum and French (also David), by all lefties and by well-trained faux rightists.

Such dissembling about America having always been multicultural are no more than post hoc justifications for turning the country into a veritable Tower of Babel.

Early America’s colonies were founded by Englishmen in periwigs, speaking different English dialects. They were joined by Irish, Scottish, French, Dutch, German and Swedish Christians, who quickly adopted English as lingua franca.

Not even the woke Wikipedia denies that, “Nearly all colonies and, later, states in the United States, were settled by migration from” one colony to another, with “foreign immigration” generally playing “a minor role after the first initial settlements.”

In other words, population growth was organic, a result of the settlers themselves multiplying and being fruitful, not of a flood of immigrants.

This so-called “multiethnic” dispensation saw early Americans publicly debate and come to a broad agreement on some highly complex, abstract matters of political philosophy, an impossibility today. The colonial community had to be pretty tight to arrive at the Articles of Confederation, followed by the Constitution.

Try as he might, not even the sainted Barack Obama got away with claiming, as he did, that, “Islam had been woven into the fabric of our country since its founding.”

Beyond their heavy involvement in the slave trade and in the Barbary wars—and contrary to Obama’s modern myth-making—Muslims were most certainly not enmeshed in America from its inception.

Moreover, and almost to a man, the learned Founding Father, as chronicled by Laura Rubenfeld of PJ Media, held a dismal view of Islam and its vampiric prophet.

It gives me great pleasure to break it to my anti-Semitic readers and to Ilhan Omar, the representative from Mogadishu in Minnesota: Jews were around. Early American Jews were of, mostly, Sephardic origins, having hailed from Spain and Portugal. That Jewry has always been more refined and reactionary than their radical, East-European brethren, who arrived much later.

And so we find Jews fighting or financing the War of Independence. Francis Salvador and Haym Solomon come to mind. “The highest ranking Jewish officer of the Colonial forces was Colonel Mordecai Sheftall.” Why, Jews even produced proud Confederate soldiers, the likes of Col. Abraham Charles Myers.

It was to the peaceful Jews of America that George Washington saw fit to promise peace and goodwill in a 1790 address to a synagogue congregation in Newport, Rhode Island.

Descendants of the original inhabitants of the United States of America are certainly not up to dealing with the political aggression brought to the country’s politics by recent immigrants. Come to speak of it, neither are the First Nations, the American Indians, who’re also politically more passive, when compared to the barbarians who’ve joined the Empire, since 1965.

To tether the character of Rep. Ilhan Omar to America’s immigration preferences is perfectly proper. Likewise Rashida Tlaib. The representative from Michigan is a second-generation Palestinian-American, and is every bit as tribal, politically aggressive and reliably leftist as Omar.

ORDER IT NOW

By virtue of its main source countries, America’s mass immigration policy privileges individuals like Omar: angry, anti-white, and highly receptive to theories that blacken the West and porcelainize the undeveloped world (a pedagogic poison that is, by the way, hothoused in the U.S.—K to 12 and beyond).

Muslim power in the U.S., we are assured, is negligible. Demographers peg the number of Muslims in America at 3.5 million, a mere 1 percent of the population. Nobody buys that—all the more so, given that “the Census Bureau has not asked questions about religion since the 1950s. “Some say the number is closer to 5 million and rising,” surmises the Economist.

The more politically aggressive the new arrivals, the more demographers stick by their “puny numbers” consolation.

Kamala Harris’ mother migrated to California from Chennai, in southern India. But the senator “rarely mentions the Indian side of her family while campaigning.” (I wonder why?)

How long before Harris tells her unschooled voters that Indian-Americans were “woven into the fabric of our country since its founding”?

The truth is that Indian-Americans have “arrived in America over the past two decades.” They’re a new addition to the country’s state-planned, multicultural mosaic. But, like Muslims, they are highly aggressive politically and reliably leftist.

“… Capitol Hill, for example, is crammed with staff and interns of Indian-American heritage. They also appear to be ‘over-represented’ in academia, the media and other influential posts,” notes the Economist, a left-liberal news magazine.

Again, we are assured that “only 1 million voters of Indian descent are politically active.”

Accordingly, the Economist even attempts to finesse the vile practice Indian arrivals have of cultivating their own, Indian-only “informal networks.” As those in the corporate world know all-too-well, Indian-Americans wrestle jobs for one another and for their kin.

Once ensconced in a position of power, individuals of South Asian descent tend to work assiduously to fire pale faces and hire others of their own persuasion.

Anglo-Americans, on the other hand, hire by talent, not by tribe. Their fate in multicultural America is to be dispossessed by the politically savvy, ruthlessly racist Other.

For that is the reality of multiculturalism in the West. It means conferring political privileges on many an individual whose illiberal practices and proclivities run counter to, even undermine, the American political tradition.

Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian column since 1999. She is the author of Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011) & The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed (June, 2016). She’s on Twitter, Facebook & Gab. Latest on YouTube: “How Democracy Made Us Dumb.

 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: Anglo-Saxons, Jews, Multiculturalism 
Hide 63 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. anon[190] • Disclaimer says:

    Well done, Ilana.

    • Troll: Sam Coulton
  2. Corvinus says:

    “Early America’s colonies were founded by Englishmen in periwigs, speaking different English dialects. They were joined by Irish, Scottish, French, Dutch, German and Swedish Christians, who quickly adopted English as lingua franca.”

    Depends upon how one defines “quickly”. Source –>
    http://faculty.las.illinois.edu/debaron/essays/legend.htm)

    The English-only nativists who attacked the Germans used arguments similar to those heard nowadays against newer immigrants. Benjamin Franklin considered the Pennsylvania Germans to be a “swarthy” racial group distinct from the English majority in the colony. In 1751 he complained, “Why should the Palatine Boors be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion?” (The papers of Benjamin Franklin. Ed. Leonard W. Labaree. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1959. vol 4:234).

    The Germans were accused by other eighteenth-century Anglos of laziness, illiteracy, clannishness, a reluctance to assimilate, excessive fertility, and Catholicism. They were even blamed for the severe Pennsylvania winters (Feer 1952, 403; Mittelberger 1898, 104). Most irritating to Pennsylvania’s English-firsters in the latter 1700s was German language loyalty, although it was clear that, despite community efforts to preserve their language, Germans were adopting English and abandoning German at a rate that should have impressed the rest of the English-speaking population.

    Anti-German sentiment spread along with German immigration, and the nation as a whole resisted both the German bilingual schools that were established in parts of the Midwest in the 19th century and the common practice of publishing legal notices in German-American newspapers. On a number of occasions the U.S. Congress again rejected motions to print laws or other documents in German as well as English. The motions were often treated jocularly and were shouted down amidst racist cries of, “What! In the Cherokee? [and in] the Old Congo language!

    Consider the second wave of German immigrants (mid-1800’s)…

    https://news.wisc.edu/study-debunks-myth-that-early-immigrants-quickly-learned-english

    “In other words, population growth was organic, a result of the settlers themselves multiplying and being fruitful, not of a flood of immigrants.”

    Context is important here. More than 3 million immigrants came to the United States from Europe between 1600 and 1799. Of course, as the nation expanded with new territory and became industrialized, there was a “flood of immigrants”, beginning with the Irish and the Germans in the 1850’s and the Italians and Poles, among others, in the late 1800’s.

    “Moreover, and almost to a man, the learned Founding Father, as chronicled by Laura Rubenfeld of PJ Media, held a dismal view of Islam…”

    Only three were listed. Thomas Jefferson was conveniently missing–[He] says neither Pagan nor Mahometan [Muslim] nor Jew ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the commonwealth because of his religion…(O)ur civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions.”

    George Washington suggested a way for Muslims to “obtain proper relief” from a proposed Virginia bill, laying taxes to support Christian worship. On another occasion, the first president declared that he would welcome “Mohometans” to Mount Vernon if they were “good workmen”. Officials in Massachusetts were equally insistent that their influential Constitution of 1780 afforded “the most ample liberty of conscience…to Deists, Mahometans, Jews and Christians,” a point that Chief Justice Theophilus Parsons resoundingly affirmed in 1810.

    Interesting to note that a group of (white) citizens of Chesterfield County, VA (southerners!) wrote to the state assembly on Nov. 14, 1785:

    “Let Jews, Mehometans and Christians of every denomination enjoy religious liberty…thrust them not out now by establishing the Christian religion lest thereby we become our own enemys and weaken this infant state. It is mens labour in our Manufactories, their services by sea and land that aggrandize our Country and not their creeds. Chain your citizens to the state by their Interest. Let Jews, Mehometans, and Christians of every denomination find their advantage in living under your laws.”

    “America’s mass immigration policy privileges individuals like Omar: angry, anti-white, and highly receptive to theories that blacken the West and porcelainize the undeveloped world.”

    According to Who/Whom?

    “Come to speak of it, neither are the First Nations, the American Indians, who’re also politically more passive, when compared to the barbarians who’ve joined the Empire, since 1965.”

    So the Vietnamese, the Kenyan, and the Guatemalan are “barbarians”? Consider how nativists back in the day believed that only stout Anglo-Saxon heritage served as the conduit to Western Civilization superiority and American exceptionalism. Do you really think they desired to have their culture being watered down by immigrants of notoriously questionable character, that being swarthy Poles and Italians?

    Senator Henry Cabot Lodge articulated the necessity for literacy tests and other measures to weed out, at worst, or outright deny, at best, the inclusion of “new” immigrants into American society –>

    “It is found, in the first place, that the illiteracy test will bear most heavily upon the Italians, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, Greeks, and Asiatics, and lightly, or not at all, upon English-speaking emigrants, or Germans, Scandinavians, and French. In other words, the races most affected by the illiteracy test are those whose emigration to this country has begun within the last twenty years and swelled rapidly to enormous proportions, races with which the English speaking people have never hitherto assimilated, and who are most alien to the great body of the people of the United States.”

    Lodge stated the problem succinctly–Southern and Eastern Europeans were culturally corrosive. Anglo-Saxon ideals from his perspective were being destroyed by waves of foreigners with their own culture and no desire to preserve nor adopt. Even Alt Right leader Vox Day agrees–“It’s telling, is it not, how all of these foreigners and immigrants just happened to produce a new definition of American that included them, a definition that was not held by the Founding Fathers. Nor is it a coincidence that this self-serving definition was subsequently used to justify the largest invasion to have ever taken place in human history, an invasion that has severely weakened the once-mighty American nation.”

    You have to go back.

    • Replies: @anon
  3. I beg to differ. They didn’t all “adopt English as their lingua franca.” How come nobody ever talks about White-Pennsylvania-Dutch-Protestants? WPDPs?

    • Replies: @Realist
  4. Tusk says:

    And so Washington said:

    This tribe of black gentry work more effectually against us, than the enemy’s arms. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties, and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each State, long ere this, has not hunted them down as pests to society, and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.

    I do wonder what ‘tribe’ of gentry, so despicable, would finance both sides of wars and profiteer off conflict?

    • Replies: @Observator
  5. anon20 says:

    “Multiculturalism” (like “diversity”) is just a code word for Anti-white.

    • Agree: Realist
  6. gT says:

    Multiculturalism elbowing the Anglo Americans out is the symptom; the cause is Ilana’s tribe who want all the Gringo’s to become Latino shit. Similarly multiculturalism is elbowing the Europeans out as her tribe wants Europe to become Muslim African Arab shit.

    So with North and South America being Latino, Europe and Mediterranean basin and Middle East being Muslim, Africa being Africa, Russia being Russia, India being India, and the Far East being Sinocentrismed , the cause of the One World Government is advanced because now there are only 6 entities to subvert and manage, instead of the 100’s of countries to subvert and manage.

    The One World Government, with Ilana’s tribe ruling it, is a long term incremental process. The many centre’s of power become fewer, then the few centre’s of power become fewer still, until there is only one centre of power in charge of the whole globe. The AngloSphere is not needed.

  7. Eric135 says:

    The first U.S. immigration law of 1790 limited citizenship to whites. It should have stayed that way.

    Now we can see — as the Founding Fathers could not — that mixing religions is just as bad as mixing races.

    America is now run by Jews, who took over from the WASP ruling class about 50 years ago, and we’ve gotten six things as a result:

    1) Demonization of whites and Christians

    2) Destruction of the white working class via the importation of low-wage Third World immigrants and offshoring of jobs to low-wage Third World countries

    3) Increasing degeneracy and immorality — casual abortion, pornography, obscenity, perversion, and the destruction of the family

    4) Cultural Marxism

    5) Endless wars for Israel

    6) White people in America being systematically discriminated against and replaced by non-whites. Also known as The Great Replacement.

    • Replies: @Reality Cheque
    , @Rogue
  8. @Tusk

    American blacks who escaped to British lines during the War of Independence were (eventually) repatriated to Africa, to the Sierra Leone colony established there by Britain for the purpose. American blacks who joined the rebels would receive as reward for their service two centuries of second-class citizenship at best, murderous apartheid at worst. This did not go unnoticed by others disgusted by the hypocrisy of the rebels. As Samuel Johnson dryly observed, it is the drivers of negroes who yelp loudest for freedom.

  9. Radek says:

    This is a shockingly racist article even by Ilana’s low standards. OK, haters are going to hate. As a brilliant Indian American colleague at work said to me the other day- “you know what, if someone is racist it is their problem not mine” before going on to say that she has never met a racist who had succeeded in life.

    In this age of far right terrorism, threats and violence, and sinister attempts at on-line radicalization of mainly young, vulnerable white males, this article is nothing less than incitement to—–(you know what I mean?) . Ilana posts mainly in Unz and WND (the later a conspiracy site thankfully on the verge of closure due to bankruptcy) and she damn knows that plenty of nut jobs read the articles on these websites and as some of the comments reveal, some of these guys are shit crazy and probably on the verge of picking an automatic and start mass shooting. Now I am not saying that if a mass shooter starts gunning down Indian Americans -a class of people Ilana hates, in Seattle, where Ilana lives , she will gloat and cheer but sometimes I am not so sure.

    Lets now look at Indian Americans as a group -a class of people Ilana repeatedly insults and caricatures. According to her, the bulk of them are ‘dumb’ HB-1 visa recipients who carry on indulging in practices they have imported from India. The reality is the exact opposite and the statistics are revealing- Indian Americans (a minuscule minority in America’s melting pot) have the highest median income of any groups in America- higher than Jewish Americans. They are the best educated and their children are among the highest performers in SAT scores (source: The Meritocratic Trap by Daniel Markovits 2019). Even more remarkably, a disproportionately high number of high skilled, high earning, Indian men who are super-ordinate workers and who arrive here still young and single, end up marrying white American women. They are a law abiding group, many of whom are CEOs, nationally known politicians (both Republicans and Democrats), Nobel prizes winners and Ivy league professors.

    Unlike the average Indian American, Ilana Mercer is a recent immigrant and a failed immigrant; she does not like America yet she posses neither the guts nor the money to buy a one way ticket back to her homeland South Africa.
    Ilana reveals, in her diatribes, that she has the mind and heart of a feral, uncouth, borderline ghetto bitch.

  10. Anonymous[234] • Disclaimer says:

    Is there such thing as an Anglo-American? In my experience white Americans are very particular about their origins and don’t like being called “Anglo”, even Americans who are mostly of English descent don’t like being called “Anglo” and just refer to themselves as American. This is despite the fact that white Americans, regardless of their origin, speak English and are culturally Anglo and in any other country would be undoubtedly considered Anglos.

    This is not the case for Hispanics, even Hispanics who don’t have the smallest amount of Spanish ancestry don’t mind being called “Spanish” and often refer to themselves as “Spanish”. Even Argentinians who often have more Italian ancestry than Spanish ancestry don’t mind being called “Spanish” either. Basically, Hispanic/Spanish identity is much more cohesive than “Anglo” identity is, it’s something Hispanics take pride in while Anglos in contrast often go to great lengths to distance themselves from any Anglo heritage.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  11. It gives me great pleasure to break it to my anti-Semitic readers and to Ilhan Omar, the representative from Mogadishu in Minnesota: Jews were around. Early American Jews were of, mostly, Sephardic origins, having hailed from Spain and Portugal. That Jewry has always been more refined and reactionary than their radical, East-European brethren, who arrived much later.

    The ‘Old Crowd’ was just as toxic because of financial leverage.

    Larry Fink who runs BlackRock, Inc. (U.S. $6.84 trillion in assets under management as of June 2019) is the heir of old banksters like Marcus Goldman, Samuel Sachs, Mayer Lehman and Joseph Bear.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  12. Realist says:

    Whites were the first to build habitable buildings more than four storeys high, the first to construct bridges to carry the weight of steam trains, which we also invented, and the safe and secure mines that produced the coal that smelted the metal that formed the engines that powered the trains with the coal we mined. We are—in a word—astonishing. In invention and innovation we are elves and everyone else are orcs, and the orcs despise us for it all whilst coveting the things we have created.

    • Agree: brandybranch
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  13. Corvinus says:
    @Realist

    “Whites were the first to build habitable buildings more than four storeys high…”

    Not whites, different ethnic groups like the English and the French. And, of course, there was this group of people. Perhaps you were asleep in American history class when your instructor presented this topic.

    https://www.nps.gov/meve/learn/historyculture/cliff_dwellings_home.htm

    “the first to construct bridges to carry the weight of steam trains, which we also invented, and the safe and secure mines that produced the coal that smelted the metal that formed the engines that powered the trains with the coal we mined.”

    Due in large part to the innovations by the Chinese and the Mesopotamians.

    “In invention and innovation we are elves and everyone else are orcs, and the orcs despise us for it all whilst coveting the things we have created.”

    What about all that we as a race have destroyed along the way?

    Here is a hate fact–“White inventions” or “western science”, while noteworthy in their original ideas and innovations, of course owe much to gunpowder, paper, the compass, and movable type (Chinese), to the number 0 (India), and to the idea of a rule-based, law-giving universal Creator (Middle East). The rise of white people to jackbooting status, I mean bearers of civilization, was built on these discoveries.

    Bear in mind that there are few inventions that are “purely” white. Take this comment for example. It depends on the Internet and computers – “white inventions”. But it also depends on the alphabet, a Phoenician invention, and the idea of writing itself, which in the West comes from Egypt. At any point in history, most inventions will come from one part of the world because it is the most advanced at that particular time. So while most important inventions of the past few hundred years were made by white people, that is only because they have been on top during that time frame. The Egyptians and the Chinese had a far longer reign compared to Europeans when it came to technological advancements.

    • Replies: @Eric135
    , @Felix Krull
  14. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    “In my experience white Americans are very particular about their origins and don’t like being called “Anglo””

    Probably because white Americans are mutts–the intermingling of different European ethnicities.

    “even Americans who are mostly of English descent don’t like being called “Anglo” and just refer to themselves as American.”

    OK.

    “This is despite the fact that white Americans, regardless of their origin, speak English and are culturally Anglo and in any other country would be undoubtedly considered Anglos.”

    No, we are culturally American. We derived our culture from a host of places. Moreover, in any other country Americans are undoubtedly called American.

    “This is not the case for Hispanics, even Hispanics who don’t have the smallest amount of Spanish ancestry don’t mind being called “Spanish” and often refer to themselves as “Spanish”.”

    According to Who/Whom?

    “Even Argentinians who often have more Italian ancestry than Spanish ancestry don’t mind being called “Spanish” either.”

    How do you know for certain?

    “Basically, Hispanic/Spanish identity is much more cohesive than “Anglo” identity is, it’s something Hispanics take pride in while Anglos in contrast often go to great lengths to distance themselves from any Anglo heritage.”

    Actually, Americans take great pride in their heritage, whether or not they are of Anglo descent.

  15. @Eric135

    5) Endless wars for Israel

    Pray tell, who actually won those wars?

    • Replies: @Eric135
  16. anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:

    I went to our local Jewish center a week ago, on Sabbath and heard a rabbi, speaking on the phone. From what I heard, I understood that there has been a meeting of the Sanhedrin – on the Pedophile Island. And it has been decided there: the flow of low-IQ immigrants will be increased at least tenfold during the next decade.

    The countries that have been chosen as sources of human material are Pakistan, Mexico, Bangladesh, Nigeria and other African and Middle East countries, to some extent. The choice was based, as I understand, on the following criterias. First of all, natural horniness – it is important, that the Great Replacement happens fast, as a shock. Second, the skin color – new population must be of at least brown skin tone, though black is preferable, since it has been established through research that white women prefer black men.

    The research, if I am not mistaken was conducted at the Rockfeller Institute and it showed that white women are predisposed to be attracted to black men much more, than to men of their own race, and that this predisposition is genetic in nature. And that at the same time, the stigmatization of the black race in the United States has created obstacles for spontaneous social interaction between black men and white women.

    So as to eradicate these obstacles, a propaganda technique of extreme vehemence has been developed, and it will be implemented as soon as the process is set in motion. It is called the B.B.J. – the acronim for Big Black Johnson, which is the secret dream of white women; in short, that is an image of a glamourous black man in Kelvin Klein underpants, holding his Johnson, which will be omnipresent.

    At the same time, white men will be bombarded with subliminal messages of homosexual character. “It’s okay to be gay” will become the motto of the New Age. Tolerance lessons in schools and kindergartens will become much more intense; it will be a must for teenagers to wear dresses and to sing female songs. Homosexual families will become a new social standard. Little kids will be wearing “I have two daddies” t-shirts.

    As the result of all this, of course, soon enough the United States of America, as we know it, will cease to exist. A new nation will be born – populated with mixed-race couples and cute brown babies. The rednecks, as the last resisting white people will be called, are going to experience a period of unprecedented frustration. And there will be nothing for them to hope for – nothing at all.

    State of the art robocop police forces will be in charge of social order. Micro drones will be in the air. Nano cameras and hidden microphones will be implanted into the sculls of infants. The whole financial system will undergo a thorough transformation. Money will be abolished, and replaced with obedience rating scores. All purchases will have to be made through the satellite Internet and will be possible with usage of chips alone; no credit cards will be issued.

    So, this is it, in short. Some things I cannot expose, but this is, in short what I can relate about the agreement the Sanhedrin has reached on the Pedophile Island. I also know that Barbara Spectre is now setting up a network of 600 new non-profit organizations worldwide, and Rothschild is building ships. Big ships. A lot of them.

    I hope that Mossad will not find me; I am using Tor through VPN now and am posting this from a hotspot in a cafeteria, but people have to know the truth.

  17. @Amerimutt Golems

    (((Mercer))) fails to mention how she and her rabbi father Ben Isaacson (sounds Eastern European) elbowed out the Afrikaners from power in South Africa with their anti-apartheid work.

    As to the Sephardic Jews in America, they were somewhat accepted by the WASPs who were Freemasons and Kabbalists. These Sephardic Jews were expelled from Spain, went to Holland, then England and finally America. The Protestants in Holland and England were Judaizers so this is how these Jews formed alliances with the Protestants. There were not many Sephardic Jews, but then we got the Eastern European Jews who now dominate Jewry.

    Mercer, Tlaib and Omar are not Western women and will be sent back to their countries. Tlaib’s country is Jordan.

    • Replies: @anon
  18. @Radek

    Well, it might not be sensible to call her a bitch and then call HER uncouth, eh?

    As for South Africa, are you serious? She’s cowardly because she doesn’t want to return and run a high risk of ultimately being raped and killed? You’re setting up a real fair standard there, Sanjay.

    Do you have the guts to move to Pakistan, announce that you’re Indian, and for good measure preach some religion the locals other than Islam? If not, you must be a coward.

  19. @Radek

    East Indians are not Western and will be repatriated. The few smart Indians in the West have to go back and fix their shithole country. The average Indian IQ is 82.

    East Indians in the GOP are being tossed out. Most East Indians are Democratics. Many marry Jews, also a non-Western group.

    (((Mercer))) has a country – Israel.

  20. @RadicalCenter

    Radical Center, you have an Asian wife and offspring. You imported your Asian wife so you and your Asian family will have to move to Asia.

  21. Exile says:
    @Radek

    Despite the squalor, disorder and backwardness of their homelands, there is no ethnic group on the planet so incessant and hyperbolic in their self-promotion and venomous in their denigration of ethnic rivals as Indians.

    If the Tribe finally succeeds in its ambition to Shoah Whites, I hope my ghost sticks around to see the sons of Freud, Mao & Gandhi make a mess of each other in their End Times struggle for the last shekels and atta-boys on Earth

  22. Rogue says:
    @Eric135

    Agreed.

    I like Ilana’s articles, but she seems oblivious of her own tribe’s extended influence on the history of the USA’s demographic White decline.

    Although she did allude to the flood of Ashkenazi starting in the late 19th century.

    Methinks that particular immigration policy needed a bit more fine-tuning.

  23. Thomm says:
    @Radek

    Dude, pay no attention to these fringe nuts. The average White Trashionalist has an IQ of 70, and almost half of them are gay.

    Hell, I am a white American guy, as evidenced by my 2000+ comments that demonstrate immense knowledge about American pop culture, burgers, and guns. By the same token, I haven’t commented on the last twenty South Asia-specific threads. Yet, these illiterate wiggers think I am a South Asian (except when they think I am Jewish). Why? Because I once defended Dinesh D’Souza. I also pointed out that some immigrant groups (such as Indians) are successful here.

    Rest assured that about 80% of white Americans have no problem with successful, low-crime minority groups. We keep these Trashionalists out of respectable society.

    But the rising tide of Indians who have taken to white-bashing has to stop. This is extremely unwise, as though Indians learned nothing from Uganda. You have a duty to keep these Indians under control.

    I like a lot of Ilana Mercer writes, and agree with about 70% of her views. But in some areas, she goes off the deep end (most notably her insane jealousy of Ivanka Trump).

    • Replies: @radek
  24. Anonymous[651] • Disclaimer says:
    @Radek

    Indians are the only ethnic group I’ve come across who seem consistently as bad if not worse than Jews in their anti-white attitude and general arrogance. High IQ Indians displacing Jews in the West wouldn’t be any improvement for whites, it may even be worse.

    I’ve seldom met an Indian who doesn’t support open borders into Western countries and the whole left wing globalist agenda despite wanting to keep India a Hindu ethno-state (or Sikh in the case of Punjab). Their view on Western countries vs their own country is just like Jews and Israel, they think like that without a hint of hypocrisy or irony.

  25. Rich says:
    @Radek

    “Racist” means White, and since the author is pretty Pale, I guess this word, under its present definition, is correct. So what? Do you guys think calling someone a name works like a hex? There’s absolutely nothing wrong with someone being a promoter of their people. Hispanics actually have a group called ‘The Race’ that politicians often kneel before. Blacks have a group that calls for their ‘advancement’ without a care about the ‘advancement’ of others. Mrs Mercer’s article is historically accurate and your voodoo words are meaningless.

    • Agree: brandybranch
  26. radek says:
    @Thomm

    Thomm, thanks for your comment. I agree no group should indulge in white bashing, or bash any other ethnicity for that matter. Ilana has a problem with some of the more successful of her fellow immigrants. Jealousy aside, even the dumbest pop psychologist will understand that the narrative of ‘successful immigrants’ in America does not apply to her. In Ilana’s so called writings what comes across repeatedly is hatred, envy, anger, jealousy and a sense of entitlement- ‘I am so brilliant, why am I not getting book deals, why am I not been invited to talk shows?’ , blah blah blah and whine, whine, whine. Successful people do not display this trait. Ilana is also naive and deluded . How else do you explain – a rather swarthy foreign born Jewish woman alinging herself with white nationalists, many of whom are neo nazis and holocaust deniers and begs them to take notice of her. She sure is some big fat dumbass.

  27. Realist says:
    @obwandiyag

    White-Pennsylvania-Dutch-Protestants?

    Those are Germans. You need to become familiar with American history.

    • Replies: @obwandiyag
  28. @Realist

    You are a complete and utter fucking idiot. A Rushdie quote comes to mind. Oh, to be condescended to by imbeciles. You don’t even get my point. Besides lecturing me on something I know better than you ever will.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Realist
  29. imbroglio says:
    @Radek

    I read Ilana’s piece to say that Indian-Americans work hard to further their group interests by, among other things, trying to find jobs and career advancement for the members of their group. Which is to say they’re very like other racial/ethnic groups. Her personal feelings about Indian-Americans are irrelevant. Her observation is accurate or it isn’t.

    If Indian-Americans are the best and brightest of all American groups, more power to them. Maybe, in time, they’ll be the new Jews and give the old Jews a rest.

  30. There’s a hell of a long way to go before the Muslims do as much damage as the Jews,

  31. Eric135 says:
    @Reality Cheque

    Pray tell, who actually won those wars?

    I’m sure you can have fun finding out.

    Be sure to report back to us.

  32. Eric135 says:
    @Morton's toes

    Sigh . . .

    “Hamilton” is about the most stupid thing I’ve heard of lately.

    I wonder when a 350 pound Blatino male-to-female tranny is going to waddle out onto a balcony as “Juliette.”

  33. Eric135 says:
    @Corvinus

    Bear in mind that there are few inventions that are ‘purely’ white.

    Subtract white inventions from the world and you’re left with Haiti.

    The Egyptians and the Chinese had a far longer reign compared to Europeans when it came to technological advancements.

    A far longer reign of what? Did they have airplanes or something?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  34. Realist says:
    @obwandiyag

    You don’t even get my point.

    Oh I get your point…you’re a stupid fuck and don’t know shit about America.

    Oh, to be condescended to by imbeciles.

    I just was.

    Besides lecturing me on something I know better than you ever will.

    From your dumbass name I suspect you’re a black shitlib. And know nothing, particularly about Pennsylvania Deutsch.

    • Replies: @obwandiyag
  35. Realist says:
    @obwandiyag

    Why would a black take an American Indian name…other than the IQs are about the same?

  36. @Corvinus

    What about all that we as a race have destroyed along the way?

    You mean like “we” destroyed Jericho?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  37. @anonymous

    The research, if I am not mistaken was conducted at the Rockfeller Institute and it showed that white women are predisposed to be attracted to black men much more, than to men of their own race, and that this predisposition is genetic in nature.

    Observation of actual behavior on dating sites gives lie to that study. For both genders, being white is the preferred option.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  38. Corvinus says:
    @Eric135

    “Subtract white inventions from the world and you’re left with Haiti.”

    Except they are not “white inventions”. They are innovations made by a host of ethnicities, which are predicated upon innovations from other civilizations.

    “A far longer reign of what? Did they have airplanes or something?”

    No, just the foundational aspects of our current civilization, along with the Sumerians.

    https://www.history.com/news/sumerians-inventions-mesopotamia

    Remember, you didn’t built that.

    • Replies: @Eric135
  39. Corvinus says:
    @Felix Krull

    “You mean like “we” destroyed Jericho?”

    No, silly goose. The civilizations and cultures of North America, Africa, and Asia. It’s what we do quite well for the sake of free stuff and gimmedats.

  40. @Realist

    Do all the braindead un-interesting pedestrian dull pollhead idiotic cretinous moronic boltbrain knucklehead peasebrain bovine wormlike name-calling you want.

    You still didn’t get my original point. At-tall. Because you are plainly too literacy-challenged.

    • Replies: @Realist
  41. Realist says:
    @obwandiyag

    You still didn’t get my original point.

    You never have a point. You call others names and insult, but when they return in kind you cry like the sub-saharan pussy you are.

  42. Eric135 says:
    @Corvinus

    Except they are not “white inventions”.

    Yes, they are.

    Apart from East Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa — which couldn’t even invent the wheel –Aryans ruled the ancient world and were responsible for all of its inventions.

    They would have made much faster progress if they hadn’t mixed with non-whites.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  43. anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:
    @Felix Krull

    Negroes with big black Johnson do not need to use dating sites. All white women who are attractive enough to pass face control meet their sex partners in night clubs.

    Dating sites are for losers.

    • Replies: @Eric135
  44. anon20 says:

    Multiculturalism is just a code word for anti-white.

  45. Corvinus says:
    @Eric135

    No, they are not white inventions. Inventions are made by individuals who come from different races and ethnicities.

    “Apart from East Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa — which couldn’t even invent the wheel…”

    Pay close attention here. Some would argue that since this important innovation was not found throughout Africa, it is a sign of intellectual weakness. Wheeled vehicles appear in late 400 B.C., near simultaneously in Mesopotamia and Central Europe. The wheel and axle was barely used in Sub-Saharan Africa (except Ethiopia and Somalia) until colonial powers arrived in the 19th century. Though not independently invented, the wheel was known to African societies. Why was it not adopted? Reasonably, it was not perceived to largely increase efficiency, considering this region had no drought animals (until European contact) or lack of suitable terrain in dense forests and mountainous areas. Where systems of slavery and forced labor were prevalent, it may also have
    reduced incentives to upgrade labor efficiency. So why did it take some parts of Africa longer use the wheel for travel? To a number of groups of people, they already had efficient means like the canoe. For instance, in the desert, riding on a camel may be better than being pulled on a carriage. Its height makes it less suitable for drought purposes than oxen, but from perhaps 1000 B.C. it was used in Asia and North Africa for drawing wagons and for plowing. Inventions must fulfill an urgent need if they are to gain widespread use. Their absence is to be expected if new technology introduced is deemed other than important.

    “They would have made much faster progress if they hadn’t mixed with non-white…”

    According to Who/Whom?

    • Replies: @Eric135
  46. Eric135 says:
    @Corvinus

    No, they are not white inventions. Inventions are made by individuals who come from different races and ethnicities.

    Wrong. Virtually all inventions and mathemtical and scientific discoveries have been made by whites: Volta, Ampere, Bell, Morse, Newton, Gauss, Edison, Hertz, Hooke, Euclid, Pythagoras, von Humboldt, Otto, Harvey, Benz, the Wright Brothers, Fermat, Hilbert, Rutherford, Pasteur, Bacon, Darwin, Copernicus, Ptolemy, Kepler, Hippocrates, Hubble, Fourier, Lavoisier, Leeuwenhoek, Watt, Maxwell, Galen, Descartes, Pascal, Cantor, Dedekind, Caley, Bohr, Heisenberg, Planck, Priestley, Curie, Galileo, Archimedes, Galton, Turing, Huygens, Boyle, Chadwick, Dalton, Euler, Faraday, Linnaeus, Nobel, Thomson, Lagrange, Riemann, Poincare, etc.

    Only a negligible number have come from non-whites. And that was only after they were trained by whites and/or learned about what whites had done.

    It’s the same with great art, literature and philosophy. The masterpieces have overwhelmingly come from whites.

    Ditto the greatest achievements in exploration and military conquest.

    Your tortured excuse for the wheel not being invented/used in sub-Saharan Africa is ridiculous. Wheels make things easier for people regardless of where they live.

    The reason blacks in sub-Saharan Africa didn’t come up with the wheel to make their lives easier is because they weren’t/aren’t very bright and enterprising. Surely at some point they saw a rock roll down a hill — duh.

    Put all of that together, and it is obvious that whites created almost all of civilization. No other group can make that claim.

    So of course, it’s fashionable to hate whitey or make nonsense up like you do. It’s all based on envy and jealousy.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  47. Eric135 says:
    @anonymous

    Negroes with big black Johnson do not need to use dating sites. All white women who are attractive enough to pass face control meet their sex partners in night clubs.

    Yes, if they’re prostitutes, and “Big Black Johnson” is ready to shell out the shekels.

    Night clubs are for losers.

  48. Corvinus says:
    @Eric135

    Volta was Italian. Descartes was French. Kepler was German. And on and on and on. These inventors referred to themselves by their ethnicity, not race, as homage to their nation’s technological prowess. That’s just the stone cold truth. Hate fact, to be sure.

    “Your tortured excuse for the wheel not being invented/used in sub-Saharan Africa is ridiculous.”

    It’s not a “tortured excuse”, it’s a reasonable explanation by historians and geographers.

    “Wheels make things easier for people regardless of where they live”.

    Really? Again, pay close attention. Perhaps you will learn a thing or two rather than remain ignorant.

    https://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/197303/why.they.lost.the.wheel.htm

    “The reason blacks in sub-Saharan Africa didn’t come up with the wheel to make their lives easier is because they weren’t/aren’t very bright and enterprising.”

    Quite the contrary. You were asleep during this unit on World History.

    https://listverse.com/2016/07/15/10-african-civilizations-more-amazing-than-ancient-egypt/

    “Put all of that together, and it is obvious that whites created almost all of civilization.”

    You mean the human race.

    “So of course, it’s fashionable to hate whitey or make nonsense up like you do. It’s all based on envy and jealousy.”

    I will admit that projection is your strong suit.

    • Replies: @Eric135
    , @Eric135
    , @anonymous
  49. Eric135 says:
    @Corvinus

    Volta was Italian, Descartes was French, Kepler was German….These inventors referred to themselves by their ethnicity, not race…

    So what? They were still white.

    Or maybe you maintain they were Asian, black or of mixed race?

    Pray, enlighten us.

    10-african-civilizations-more-amazing-than-ancient-egypt

    So you subscribe to “We wuz kangs.”

    Nice.

    Now I know that I don’t have to take you seriously.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  50. Eric135 says:
    @Corvinus

    why.they.lost.the.wheel.htm

    Nice try. I was talking about sub-Saharan Africa not coming up with the wheel.

    You do understand what “Sahara” refers to, do you not? A desert.

    But I wasn’t talking about any desert.

    As for your “great African civilizations”, the ones in sub-Saharan Africa were nothing compared to Greece, Rome, Egypt, etc.

  51. @anonymous

    I imagine this being written by a very sexually frustrated 15 year old in some high school class where they should really be paying more attention, because pop quizzes are a thing.

  52. @Anonymous

    All I see here on the mainland US is the same kind of shit as back in Hawaii. Everyone, and everything, divided up by tribe. Depending on how each tribe sticks together, they’re successful or not.

    Japanese are the top, ruling, tribe. Filipinos pretty much own whole swathes of jobs like house cleaning, food service, agricultural, and don’t even try to get one of those jobs if you’re not of that tribe. Wanna be a cop? Be Hawaiian, but if you just want to be a security guard, be Samoan.

    There are huge areas of the economy (and the land) forbidden to you if you are white. Surprisingly, you can be a real estate agent, but unsurprisingly, this pays little. You can’t be a bus driver, cop, schoolteacher (although a few can be low-level college teachers) or a lot of the more steady, lucrative jobs.

    Ambitious whites get out. Raising children there until you’re really wealthy is child cruelty.

  53. anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Perhaps you will learn a thing or two rather than remain ignorant.

    Nah, that is not going to happen. Eric is hardcore Nazi racist. A Christian racist. “We are the new Israel” he told me. He is not going to learn. He has read Hitler and he knows what he needs to know.

    Tell him this, because I have no desire to talk to him:

    “Around 420 BC, Empedocles stated that all matter is made up of four elemental substances: earth, fire, air and water. The early theory of atomism can be traced back to ancient Greece and ancient India. Greek atomism dates back to the Greek philosopher Democritus, who declared that matter is composed of indivisible and indestructible particles called “atomos” around 380 BC. This coincided with a similar declaration by Indian philosopher Kanada in his Vaisheshika sutras around the same time period.

    “In the Islamic World, the Muslims were translating the works of the ancient Greeks and Egyptians into Arabic and were experimenting with scientific ideas. The development of the modern scientific method was slow and arduous, but an early scientific method for chemistry began emerging among early Muslim chemists, beginning with the 9th-century chemist Jābir ibn Hayyān, who is sometimes regarded as “the father of chemistry”. He introduced a systematic and experimental approach to scientific research based in the laboratory, in contrast to the ancient Greek and Egyptian alchemists whose works were largely allegorical and often unintelligble.

    “Among other influential Muslim chemists, Abū al-Rayhān al-Bīrūnī, Avicenna and Al-Kindi refuted the theories of alchemy, particularly the theory of the transmutation of metals; and al-Tusi described a version of the conservation of mass, noting that a body of matter is able to change but is not able to disappear. Rhazes refuted Aristotle’s theory of four classical elements for the first time and set up the firm foundations of modern chemistry, using the laboratory in the modern sense, designing and describing more than twenty instruments, many parts of which are still in use today, such as a crucible, cucurbit or retort for distillation, and the head of a still with a delivery tube, and various types of furnace or stove.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_chemistry

    “From 3000 BC the Mesopotamian states of Sumer, Akkad and Assyria, together with Ancient Egypt and Ebla began using arithmetic, algebra and geometry for purposes of taxation, commerce, trade and also in the field of astronomy and to formulate calendars and record time.

    “Chinese mathematics made early contributions, including a place value system and the first use of negative numbers. The Hindu–Arabic numeral system and the rules for the use of its operations, in use throughout the world today evolved over the course of the first millennium AD in India and were transmitted to the Western world through the work of Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī.

    “Contemporaneous with but independent of these traditions were the mathematics developed by the Maya civilization of Mexico and Central America, where the concept of zero was given a standard symbol in Maya numerals.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mathematics

    “The origins of Western astronomy can be found in Mesopotamia, the ‘land between the rivers’ Tigris and Euphrates, where the ancient kingdoms of Sumer, Assyria, and Babylonia were located. A form of writing known as cuneiform emerged among the Sumerians around 3500–3000 BC.

    “Astronomy in the Indian subcontinent dates back to the period of Indus Valley Civilization during 3rd millennium BCE, when it was used to create calendars. As the Indus Valley civilization did not leave behind written documents, the oldest extant Indian astronomical text is the Vedanga Jyotisha, dating from the Vedic period.

    “Astronomy in China has a long history. Detailed records of astronomical observations were kept from about the 6th century BC, until the introduction of Western astronomy and the telescope in the 17th century. Chinese astronomers were able to precisely predict eclipses.

    “Maya astronomical codices include detailed tables for calculating phases of the Moon, the recurrence of eclipses, and the appearance and disappearance of Venus as morning and evening star. The Maya based their calendrics in the carefully calculated cycles of the Pleiades, the Sun, the Moon, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, and also they had a precise description of the eclipses as depicted in the Dresden Codex, as well as the ecliptic or zodiac.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_astronomy

  54. Corvinus says:
    @Eric135

    “So what? They were still white.”

    You mean they were European.

    “Wheels make things easier for people regardless of where they live”.

    “So you subscribe to “We wuz kangs. Nice.”

    No, I subscribe to being accurate.

    “Nice try. I was talking about sub-Saharan Africa not coming up with the wheel.”

    No, your comment was ““Wheels make things easier for people regardless of where they live”. So I found a source that calls into significant question that statement. Try to keep pace.

    “As for your “great African civilizations”, the ones in sub-Saharan Africa were nothing compared to Greece, Rome, Egypt, etc.”

    So now you are backtracking here. Regardless, you are entitled to your opinion.

  55. @Observator

    Mr. Washington wasn’t talking about the blacks, lol.

  56. Why should the Palatine boors [the Germans] be suffered to swarm into our settlements, and by herding together establish their language and manners to the exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a colony of aliens, who will soon be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our anglifying them, and will never adopt our language or customs, any more than they can acquire our complexion.

    “Which leads me to one remark: That the number of purely white people in the world is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawney. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes are generally of what we call a swarthy complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only being excepted, who with the English make up the principal body of white people on the face of the earth. I could wish their numbers increased. While we are scouring our planet by clearing America of woods, and so making our side of the planet reflect a brighter light to the inhabitants of Mars or Venus, why should we in the sight of superior beings darken its people? Why increase the sons of Africa by planting them in America, where we have an opportunity, by excluding all blacks and tawneys, of increasing the lovely white and red.

  57. Trinity says:

    I remember when Keith Alexander interviewed Ilana Mercer on the Political Cesspool a few years back. I was just about to purchase her book about South Africa, but the Alexander interview convinced me that I would be better off keeping my money.

  58. anon[844] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    america was conquered founded and built by europeans ,using european institucions as a guide and european culture as a compass mayorly and thats a fact .
    we trasformed a forgotten land in the first suporpower of the world after hundred of years of sacrifice and now that everything is built you want to came and enojoy the fruit of our esfort and sacrifice?
    YOU HAVE TO GO BACK

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  59. anon[844] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    the purity spiraling must stop
    he look european he defend european heritage and he reasonably blame jews when they break the rules .

    even hitler wouldnt have expelled her

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  60. @anon

    She really believes that present day Jews are the chosen and the smartest tribe ever. She is wrong. I would classify her as a Caucasian, but her religion is Judaism – a non-Western religion. She is not a Western woman.

    Because of what she did in South Africa, we obviously cannot have her in the West. She destroyed a European tribe – the Afrikaners. Her country is Israel.

    As to “racial purity,” she would be a Caucasian. However, many Jews now have high intermarriage rates with blacks/Asians. Mark Zuckerberg has a Chinese wife and Chinese-Jewish offspring. They are not Western.

    Chloe Green, the Topshop heiress, has a black/Jewish son. The father is the black, ex-felon Jeremy Meeks. Jew are not Western.

  61. Corvinus says:
    @anon

    “america was conquered founded and built by europeans ,using european institucions as a guide and european culture as a compass mayorly and thats a fact.”

    Originally founded, indeed. But the Founding Fathers enabled future generations to chart the course of the nation.

    “we trasformed a forgotten land in the first suporpower of the world after hundred of years of sacrifice and now that everything is built you want to came and enojoy the fruit of our esfort and sacrifice?”

    We? You mean “they”. You and I came along for the ride. Pray tell, are you not an immigrant?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS