The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Hola, Ann Hart Coulter!
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Adios America” is the apropos title of Ann Coulter’s latest book. It details how mass immigration is killing America, as Bill O’Reilly would say (or still will). Adios means farewell in Spanish. Hola is the opposite. Immigration patriots bid a hearty hello to Ann Coulter, as she takes over and takes the battle to the enemy.

The big gun has arrived.

Ms. Coulter had managed to avoid the mass immigration vexation until recently. CPUKE 2013 was when she, I believe, first came out as “a single-issue voter against amnesty.” This Sally-come-lately stand, Ms. Coulter has rationalized with reference to Peter Brimelow, on whose work immigration patriots piggyback. Ann acknowledged as much during an interview with Chronicles’ Thomas Piatak. Since Brimelow had made the definitive case against the duopoly’s “plan to turn our country into a third world hellhole,” there was nothing more for her to add.

A WND reader expressed a different opinion. He writes: “Ms. Coulter is spot on but a decade late. That’s a big and calculated ‘mistake.’ Unless you recognize how politically cautious she’s been—you cannot appreciate how professionally suicidal the folks at VDARE, NumbersUSA; Michelle Malkin, Pat Buchanan and yourself have truly been all along.”

Then again, Ann herself conceded in the same interview that “Adios'” first seven chapters were a rehash. If it’s now safe to say stuff “everybody knows,” why the wait?

Like our reader, I worry that the indispensable Ann may be too late, and that we’ve passed the tipping point. For years, those of us who’ve warned about demographics have been dubbed racists. But “the D-Bomb has already dropped,” as this column noted in 2012. Demographics need not have become destiny, but they have.

Both factually and analytically exhaustive, Brimelow’s seminal “Alien Nation” remains the definitive text on centrally planned mass immigration. Peter and I are both immigrants. We came to the U.S. via Canada—and before that from countries whose national fabric is in tatters. An attachment rare among the current crop of immigrants to the American ideas of limited government and self-governance, and a recognition of the importance of the bonds that unite members of a civil society in common purpose: these prompted Peter and myself to take up the cudgels on behalf of an adopted country—America—that is still second-to-none, and an oblivious people—Americans—whose heritage is being squandered for a mess of pottage.

With first-hand experience in the visa labyrinth, I’ve been able to lift a corner of the curtain to reveal, for example, that the O-1 visa program is an open-ended one, allowing unlimited access to individuals with extraordinary abilities. If the traitors in D.C. were truly trawling for the world’s limited pool of unique talent, the O-1 visa gives them unlimited access to it. The H-1B program is anything but. Theoretically, the H-1B swindle could be abolished and all needed Einsteins and supermodels imported through the O-1 program.

A discussion in 2003 with black immigration patriot Terry Anderson, of blessed memory, prompted this warning against “selling out black Americans”: “It’s all very well to disenfranchise meek, guilt-ridden WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). But by encouraging the displacement of black Americans, promoters of unfettered immigration—black leaders included—may have slipped-up strategically. Given their history, blacks are less inclined to fade into the night. They’ve already been sold down the river once before.”

As a libertarian immigration restrictionist, it has been vital to point out that “we are [not] the world” (2006). Free trade is glorious. America needs and wants to remain the first and most mighty consumer society. But “the free flow of people across borders is not to be confused with the free flow of goods across borders. Free trade is a positive-sum game. Contrary to immigration, it is always invited, consensual and hence mutually beneficial to the parties involved.”

Some things are metaphysical. Again, we are not the world: “The purely economic argument about the price at which American workers will perform menial work is meaningless without a reference to borders and to the thing they bound—a nation. Render asunder the idea of a nation, make borders obsolete—and the world is your labor market. Sure, supply and demand must determine the price of labor. Once the borders are shut to the deluge of laborers, the supply of cheap labor (as well as the steady ‘supply’ of crime and welfarism) will no longer be limitless. A smaller pool of workers will allow wages for ‘menial work’ to rise—all the more so as employers, no longer seduced by the interminable flood of cheap labor, begin to bid for the most productive workers. The resulting higher wages, in turn, will induce more Americans to do ‘menial work.'”

Going by “the ‘logic’ of La-Raza libertarians,” “living at the public’s expense does indeed violate the rights of American taxpayers, but there is no reason to single out non-nationals.” Oh yes there is. Such illogic was defeated in 2006: “From the fact that you oppose taxpayer-funded welfare for nationals, it doesn’t follow that extending it to millions of unviable non-nationals is financially or morally negligible. (Or that it comports with the libertarian aim of curtailing government growth.) The argument is akin to saying that because a bank has been robbed by one band of bandits, arresting the next is unnecessary as the damage has already been done.”

ORDER IT NOW

As to “the exclusive emphasis in the immigration debate on border security”: What a relief it is that Ms. Coulter is finally dispelling this distraction. According to “The Immigration Scene” (2006), this fetish “has helped open-border evangelists immeasurably. Everyone (and his dog) currently concurs that we have no problem with legal immigration, only with the illegal variety. It’s now mandatory to pair an objection to the invasion of the American Southwest with an embrace of all forms of legal immigration. The sole emphasis on border security has, in all likelihood, entrenched the status quo—Americans will never assert their right to determine the nature of the country they live in and, by extension, the kind of immigrants they welcome. The security risk newcomers pose is the only permissible topic for conversation.”

Immigration into the U.S. is a statist and inorganic affair; a result of manipulation for on high. A 2002 tract, “The Problem With Immigration,” explained why: “In previous decades immigrants assimilated. Now they are encouraged by politicians and identity-politics activists to cling to a militant distinctiveness. The state-enforced ideology of multiculturalism and diversity has thus become a double-edged sword, deployed by government at once to make newcomers more subversive and the host population more submissive.”

Not enough can be said about the hypocrisy of environmental lobbies! They “abhor all by-products of human existence, unless generated by illegal aliens. In that case, the vast latrine and land fill created along the border with Mexico, as millions of migrants defecate and despoil their way to their destinations in the U.S., are just dandy.” (From “In Defense Of The Fence.”)

Alas, it might be too late for Annie to get her gun. Recounted in “Immolation by Immigration” (2002), our family witnessed the following at the American Immigration and Naturalization Service headquarters in Montreal, where we waited to complete the final leg of the immigration odyssey: “Small extended families like ours were not the norm among immigrant families. Birth rates being what they are in the Third World, one qualified legal immigrant from, say, Africa is a ticket for an entire tribe. The initial entrant—the meal ticket—integrates and pays his way; the rest remain, more often than not, unassimilable and welfare dependent.”

To paraphrase the old nursery rhyme, When she’s good she’s very very good. Ann Coulter is perhaps the most powerful ally the immigration patriot movement could hope to recruit. We can now stand down as she stands up.

 
• Category: Ideology, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Ann Coulter, Immigration 
Hide 55 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. She really should go the whole way and get that Adams Apple removed.

    • Replies: @Realist
  2. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Great article. I refer to the following sentence:

    “The security risk newcomers pose is the only permissible topic for conversation”

    In a speech in Minneapolis 2010 I presented an alternative definition of “safety” as opposed to “security”. I see this as being helpful to address societal problems, especially the immigration aspect mainly because safety and immigration is supposed to be the central pillar of country politics (today). Even for the world.

  3. SFG says:

    “We can now stand down as she stands up.”

    That’s where I disagree. We gotta keep pushing.

    Even if you can’t entirely change the facts on the ground, you can change the ‘correlation of forces’, as the military guys say. 12% Hispanics is assimilable, 25% will turn us into two nations like Canada, 37% and Mexico will get California back. Wait, I’m looking for arguments against immigration…

    So, yeah, don’t give up.

  4. That anyone would take mental whack-jobs like Ann Coulter seriously, is a simple case of social physics; ‘for every action, there is an equal reaction.’ The insipid, fungal ooze that is liberalism, produces an aroma of conservatism that is revolting. Let’s say, for argument’s sake, we have a John Derbyshire flees ‘Merry Olde England’ (a “sorry” race of people) for the simple fact ’empire’ had seen ‘aliens’ invade in hordes .. a classic case of ‘chickens come home to roost.’ Then, the indigenous ‘chicken’ (e.g. Derbyshire), offended at the sight of a dark skin, or a non-Germanic language (the ‘Romance’ French language having been revolting enough) pulls up stakes and takes his ‘caravan’ across the Atlantic. Doesn’t that make him, in some sense, an Anglo-Saxon Romani?

    Maybe the real problem here is, empire, in the habit of bankrupting entire peoples, excepting for those 1% at the top of the food-chain, put persons like the sore loser who’d authored this article (not only Derbyshire) in the menial labor pool and not to worry, the same it will happen to her progeny as pension funds (its a metaphor) are raided by the same sociopath personalities who’re bleeding the taxpayer dry to prop up corporate entities who could give a proverbial rat’s ass whether the blood they drink is White, Black, Yellow or Brown. What they do appreciate (the empire’s corporations that own you) is, morons like Mercer keeping peoples’ eye off the ball. With your pension fund in the pocket of a government partnered mafia, you can look forward to flipping burgers at McDonald’s, at age 75, to survive. Now, if Ann Coulter were a man…

    You all have heard of the first grade primer ‘Dick and Jane’? Well, as fate would have it, Dick did not grow up to love Jane, because Dick (like Don) matured into a homosexual in denial, or “RRR” (sounds like a Rottweiler growl), one of those closet morality, socially/sexually frustrated and consequently mean people known as a Religious Right Republican.

    So, this has to be a adult repressed homosexual ‘dick’, or machismo porn variation, of the ‘Dick and Jane’ story. Consequently, the story of how Don Rumsfeld met his demise, because of Dick Cheney’s dog, is pretty screwed up.

    It’s called: Don and ‘dick’

    Read more

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/09/dick-cheneys-lucid-dream/

    • Replies: @GW
    , @Stealth
    , @J1234
    , @Fran Macadam
  5. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    Ann Coulter opposes the H1B and L1B Programs because some of the Hindus that come in through these two programs are pedophiles and other types of degenerates. However, they are a fraction of a percent of the number of H1B…L1 B visa scab Asian labor that has been imported into the US. since the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act. The Asian scab labor legal immigrant program should be shut down because it allows the Asian legal immigrant scab workers to actively participate in the destruction of centuries of acquired Native Born White American Engineering…Scientific….and Medical experience and knowledge. And the Asian legal immigrant scab workers and their “American” born children will make sure that this is a permanent state of affairs. This is most definitely in the realm of genocide.

    This is not a defense of importing South Asian pedophiles and cannibals….but Coulter missed the very big target.

    If Coulter can’t come out and state unequivocably that post-1965 Asians in the US are waging an over-the-top-race war against The Historic Native Born White American Majority….then her book is worthless. It is now one minute before midnight…demographically speaking…for The Historic Native Born White American Majority within the borders of the US.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  6. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    Old Hippie with petrified dingle berries for brain matter….what are you gonna do when Whitey revolts full-blown against the open and deliberate policy of race-replacemet?…Join M-13?…La Raza?

    • Replies: @Jeff Albertson
    , @Jack_W
  7. vinteuil says:

    Wow, the trolls are out in force, this morning. (This evening, for me – I’m in Санкт-Петербург just now).

    Coulter’s book is brilliant, first rate, not-to-be-missed.

    Any immigration skeptic who gives it a pass because he disagrees with her on this or that lesser issue is making a huge mistake.

    My two cents.

    • Replies: @Mark Caplan
  8. Sam Shama says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Historic Native Born White American

    Can you please define this? Serious question.

    • Replies: @Maj. Kong
  9. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    There can be more than one real problem.

  10. Mark Caplan says: • Website
    @vinteuil

    Санкт-Петербург – You mean Saint Petersburg, you cyrillic boy.

    • Replies: @vinteuil
  11. @War for Blair Mountain

    Sorry to say, I did. Ilana is the polar opposite of neocon. Just ignore the guy.

  12. Biff says:

    Everyone loves a paranoid whitey.

    The man is opposed to fair play
    He wants it all, and he wants it his way

    If it were all mine the last person I would give it to would be Ann Coulter.

  13. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    If the Counterpunch-Z Magazine-Earth Firster defectives-degenerates can’t give The Historic Native Born White American Majority any reasons to tolerate the open and deliberate policy of post-1965 race-replacement immigration policy…well, don’t be shocked if The Historic Native Born White American Majority goes into a full-blown race revolt against the race-war being waged against them.

    • Replies: @Stealth
  14. J1234 says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    “That anyone would take mental whack-jobs like Ann Coulter seriously…”

    After reading this guy’s comment, I get the feeling he’s speaking with great authority when he talks of mental whack-jobs.

    A good article by Ilana Mercer. I haven’t read Ann’s book yet, but I look forward to it. Ann Coulter is very bright…she’s managed to avoid getting fired/censored/chased out of her msm gigs for her very un-PC sentiments. At least, thus far. I suspect it’s because she knows where to draw the line. For all of her abrasiveness, she’s fairly politically savvy. Hope she can continue the battle.

    I agree with others, though…now isn’t the time to stand down. There are scores of millions of white Anglophones in the US who call themselves conservative, yet they just sit at home on their butts yelling at the tv.

  15. Stealth says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    I’m not down with conflict, just immigration restriction.

    The Counterpunch “we’re different” type liberals really grate on my last nerve. They can dress it up in socialism and anti-war/corporation/empire/Israel rhetoric all they want, but at heart they’re really just anti-white, anti-borders globalists.

    Noam Chomsky is a wonderful example. In his writings and interviews, he slides effortlessly talking about “white males,” and it’s obvious that his leftism rests atop a foundation of ethnic resentment.

  16. Realist says:
    @Bill Jones

    Great non sequitur ad hominem.

  17. Stealth says:
    @J1234

    I think he’s one of those people who wants to be seen as making a unique contribution to the debate while saying the exact same things all liberals say.

    From what I’ve seen, he abides by the standard formula:

    White people = always bad and wrong
    Non-white people = always good, right, and victimized.

    They don’t come out and express it quite so explicitly, but they never quite get around to doing anything but verbally pissing on white people.

    For instance, a white conservative will say, “why is the media so obsessed with the death of Trayvon Martin when ten people were just killed in Chicago last weekend? If black lives really matter, why are you not more concerned about that?” The liberal replies, “That’s stupid, you idiot! We can be concerned about more than one thing at a time.” But when was the last time you heard a white liberal bring up black on black gun violence for any purpose other than pushing gun control? Right. It doesn’t happen.

    • Replies: @No Second Israel
  18. “I’m not down with conflict, just immigration restriction.”

    You may not be interested in conflict, but if our immigration situation doesn’t get resolved definitively and soon, you may find that conflict is interested in YOU.

  19. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @Stealth

    Noam Chomsky was interviewd by George Yancy in the NYT two months ago. Noam Chomsky made it very clear that he believed that Whitey deserved violent racial retribution by blacks because of White Racism.

    I am surprised that Steve Sailer has not made a post about this Chomsky interview in the Sunday NYT.

    Of course, “justifiable” racial retribution by blacks against Whitey means things like home-break-ins by black yoots who tie up and pistol whip White Husbands and White Sons while the White Wife-Mother is brutally gang raped in front of pistol-whipped-tied-up White Husband and White Sons.

    Noam Chomsky…nice multimillion dollar Mansion-Summer Home on Nantucket.

  20. @J1234

    After reading this guy’s comment, I get the feeling he’s speaking with great authority when he talks of mental whack-jobs

    Speaking with authority, here’s Ann, keeping her legs crossed high (sex symbol for Jesus?) because her skirt is too short:

    “Christians are perfected Jews”

    Now, being neither Jewish nor Christian, but given a choice … horrible thought but here goes:

    Born ‘dirty’ (in sin) and God’s ‘only son’ (never mind Jesus said we’re all ‘children of God’, he did say that, right?) had to be ‘sacrificed’ (blamed on Jews) and on top of that, y’all eat his carcass (communion) .. well, ok, so it is ‘ritual’ cannibalism but taken literally compares well to Satanism –

    Yeah, Ann Coulter is a mental whack-job and so are a whole lot more people on the Christian right (the Christian left is a little less literal, is the rumor I hear), no wonder our world is as f’d up as it is…

    Somewhere else I saw ‘whack-job Ann’ claim Christians are the ‘new chosen’ and a bit of rational study in the matter convinces Armageddon might be a good thing (when it wipes most Christians and probably all of Israelis), off the earth except for the considerable environmental damage (and no, I’m not Muslim either, they’ll no doubt bleed a whole lot more than they already have) in the ‘end days’ of the mental whack-job ‘culture’ (oops, I should’ve said ‘coulter’) .. in any case ‘god’s chosen’ is a whack-job mentality, whether Jew or ‘New Jew’ in any and all cases of rabid Zionism and Coulter is a rabid Christian Zionist because ‘god’s chosen is a dumb idea’

    Excerpt

    In essence, it is right-wing Christians producing the money and political drive supporting the Israeli policies in both the West Bank and Gaza. How it is politicians on the center-left (a few sane conservatives are at least trying) fail to shake off the boogey-man of AIPAC in the name of sanity and stand up to infantile, fascist killers like Bibi Netanyahu, is beyond the pale of reason. It is cowardice

    Read more

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/14/gods-chosen-a-dumb-idea/

  21. Oldvannes says:

    The immigration problem though very serious is a symptom of a much larger concern. The US GOV changed its character around the time of the Civil War. Though GOV advocacy was never absent it was not its dominate trait. It largely played the roll of referee; the marketplace, tradition and an ability to thrive were what separated winners from losers. The Civil war was a massive commitment on the part of US GOV pitting one group of Americans against another – all of it in terms of good vs evil. Winning that war enhanced and legitimized US GOV’s sense of righteousness. Thus, we have since moved from one US GOV led effort to reform one injustice or one imperfection to another and another and another. This never end peacefully. Never.

  22. @Stealth

    You are correct.
    He is a zionist jew who in fact talking like neocon but with different style in support of Israel strategy, Oded Yinon, like Noam chomsky and Uri Avnery. Tucker called these people “closet zionists”. They are protecting Israelis’ interest, and hold the ’empire’ responsible for Israel’s crimes against humanity, like Chomsky always does. When coutler is talking against immigration, she means Muslims not Jews. They are forming and promoting Muslim bashing and persecution for apartheid entity. They put the interest of little israel above interest of the entire plant.

  23. Stealth says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Anti-white bigotry is the very heart of liberalism. Chomsky and others, no matter how reasonable and correct they sound on other issues, will never betray the core belief that white people are evil.

    I happen to agree that a lot of white people are evil, but, unlike liberals, I think people of other races are evil, too. Some are worse.

  24. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    A person can be right about some things and wrong about others.

    Personally, I’ve never understood why people like you think mass, uncontrolled immigration is so sacrosanct that no civil discussion of the matter can be allowed.

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  25. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Noam Chomsky=Greedy Cheating Immigration Enthusiast Rat-Faced-Git…

  26. Biff says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    “Noam Chomsky made it very clear that he believed that Whitey deserved violent racial retribution by blacks because of White Racism.”

    Speaking for others is a sign of low self worth.
    If Chomsky ever actually said something like that, he would lose 3/4 of his perennial audience, so I believe your interpretation is completely your own.

  27. @Stealth

    Personally, I’ve never understood why people like you think mass, uncontrolled immigration is so sacrosanct that no civil discussion of the matter can be allowed

    Maybe you made a wrong assumption, I’ll be the first to admit multiculturalism isn’t working. So, now what? Nuke the Blacks & Mexicans to preserve a lily White populace? Create ‘reservations’ for Whites? (that thought makes me laugh, just build a fence around Montana and evict all 3,000 Blacks and jam America’s right wing inside, that’d work, right?)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/10/09/liberals/

    The fact is, Whites are now destined to minority status and so perhaps a ‘practical’ civility is in order before the ‘rest of them’ recall just how it is a whole lotta people here think (noting the moron who spurred my comment offending you, could have kept his mouth shut as well)

    • Replies: @Stealth
  28. Matra says:

    If Chomsky ever actually said something like that, he would lose 3/4 of his perennial audience,

    No, he’d been an even bigger hero to the kinds of people who worship him.

  29. Maj. Kong says:
    @Sam Shama

    A. You and/or your ancestors were citizens prior to 1965
    B. Your genetic alleles code to haplogroups with ‘European’ ancestry

  30. aandrews says:

    “Noam Chomsky made it very clear that he believed that Whitey deserved violent racial retribution by blacks because of White Racism.”

    Just finished reading it. He said no such thing, clearly or insinuated.

  31. Stealth says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    So, now what? Nuke the Blacks & Mexicans to preserve a lily White populace? Create ‘reservations’ for Whites?

    Preserving a lily white America is no longer an option. I know just as well as you do that there’s no turning back the clock at this point. It would be wise to try to retain as large a slice of the pie as possible, but that isn’t the only reason to reduce immigration.

    Immigration exacerbates poverty and every social problem associated with it. We complain about violent crime, the uninsured, high school dropouts, unemployment, and a whole host of other poverty-related social issues, but for some reason, you risk personal ruin for pointing out that immigration fuels poverty more than anything else. Is it really all that smart to take in two or three million legal and illegal immigrants a year when American companies off-shore and automate every task they can?

    For the most part, immigrants to the United States are poor, and their descendents remain at the bottom of the ladder. Do some of their descendents advance? Yes. Can America handle the ones who don’t? Well, it depends on how many of them there are. Adding millions to the ranks of the impoverished is a stupid idea. We should probably stop doing that immediately.

    And if you don’t think all of this is a problem now, keep in mind that there is an unlimited number of people who want to come here.

    The fact is, Whites are now destined to minority status and so perhaps a ‘practical’ civility is in order before the ‘rest of them’ recall just how it is a whole lotta people here think (noting the moron who spurred my comment offending you, could have kept his mouth shut as well)

    Millions of white people all but physically flog themselves to demonstrate their devotion the anti-white program, but it doesn’t get them anywhere. There’s a lot of money to be made in pissing nonwhites off at white people, so it really wouldn’t matter if the vast majority of us go out of our way to make nice. And you might not think whites deserve it, but it would be nice if nonwhites were held to a slightly higher standard in that department, too.

  32. Jack_W says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    what are you gonna do when Whitey revolts full-blown against the open and deliberate policy of race-replacemet?…Join M-13?…La Raza?

    M-13 is the Great Globular Cluster in Hercules (NGC 6205).

    MS-13 is the gang.

    You can do your own punchline.

  33. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @aandrews

    I’ll summarize what Chomsky said in the interview:1)America is a racist society….2)Whites are racist…3)White racism is the cause of the economic-jobs problem that Backs have….Racist White America needs to make massive reparations to Blacks…4)White Racism makes Whites fearfull of Black racial retribution.

    So what would a reasonable White Man or White Woman conclude about Chomsky’s comments in the interview? That Whites deserve racial retribution from angry Blacks because Whites….since they are racist….cause the economic problems that Blacks are having…and therefore….deserve racial retribution from Blacks. So Chomsky either believes that White Americans deserve to be murdered and raped by Blacks…or he doesn’t…..Someone should ask Chomsky. Chomsky is close enough in the Yancy interview to advocating racial retribution by Blacks against Racist White Americans that we can make the easy and obvious inferential leap that Chomsky believes that if Racist White America doesn’t go along with reparations….than Racist White America deserves to be murdered and raped by angry black yoots.

    Combine what I just wrote above with Chomsky’s view that Darren Wilson is a racist White Cop who murdered an innocent Black teenager, and that the Ferguson verdict should be used as launching pad by Blacks to wage a social justice movement across the US….well…Chomsky is justifying the murder and rape of innocent White Americans across America..

    I’ll go a step further and state that the views I attribute to Chomsky are also embraced by the sicko Paul Craig Roberts.

  34. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @Jack_W

    “Great Globular Cluster”…that kind of sounds like:”Great Globular Postule”..that’s like…you know… America 2015 and beyond…covering reeking stinking E.Coli infested gigantic toilet bowl post-white America from sea to shinning sea…Great Globular Postule!!!!…Great Ceasar’s Ghost!!!!

    MS-13 infests the bucolic Shenandoah Valley these days…Oh Shenandoah!!!

    • Replies: @aandrews
  35. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factor"] says:

    Most dangerous immigrants are Jews and blacks.

    Jews are smart and contribute a lot but also subversive and supremacist.

    They take over elite institutions and push diversity for divide-and-rule and push garbage like homo agenda.

    Blacks are bigger and stronger and beat up white males, take white females, and destroy cities.

    Mexicans are better than Jews and Negroes if the majority population wants to keep power.

    Mexers just want jobs and to eat tacos.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Jefferson
  36. @Ronald Thomas West

    Yeah, hypocrisy and distraction, divide and conquer, keep your eye off the ball.

    And God forbid anyone but elites and their capital should be “free” …
    .

  37. vinteuil says:
    @Mark Caplan

    Yes, Saint Petersburg (the one in Россия) – and, for a true lover of music, there’s no place else to be, anywhere in the world, during the Festival of the White Nights.

  38. @War for Blair Mountain

    White racism in the USA is a “strawman” designed to collectivize guilt and martial monies to those who financially benefit from blaming back troubles on white citizens. How can I say this? Easily!

    Over the centuries and to this very hour, Muslims have enslaved and continue to enslave millions of blacks. The latest may be the Boku Haram capture of 300 black girls for purposes of making them terrorist concubines. The United States did not even originate slavery as it was brought to the colonies by Muslim traders, the Dutch, the British, etc. The institution of slavery ended in the USA in 1865 after an 82 year period . Today there are no slaves but there are plenty of existing laws to prevent employment discrimination, to subsidize black social welfare needs and to help them to gain valuable educational access to Universities all over the nation. Yet the blacks are in deep societal trouble. Broken families, massive numbers of school dropouts, high levels of teenage pregnancies, self destruction of homes and murders of family members. And then, massive numbers involved in gang violence. With Barrack Obama, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson setting the victimization standard for blacks, why would anyone expect other than the disastrous ongoing debacle of black degradation?

    If there is any basis for claims of racism, it should be black animosity for the Democrats who have been making preposterous promises to blacks since the day of Johnson’s “Great Society Program.”

  39. @Ronald Thomas West

    Two billion Muslim Islamists standing up against the thirty million Jews of Israel looks to me like an overmatch. Maybe they should stop shooting at the sky and learn how to point their weapons. It also might help them to learn how to get their tanks out of reverse! And these Islamists are such honest, ethical, upstanding citizens of the world. That is if you can ignore the slaves, rape, beheadings, beatings, murder of prisoners, destruction of valuable historical properties, destruction of the places of worship of various religions all round the world.

    No matter where you are from or who you are or what you are, you are the infidel. You need only get in line and they will gladly chop off your head. I might even subscribe to that given the extent of your illogical hatred. But then, I really believer, push come to shove, that when threatened you will gladly become an Islamic Jihadi. I do have doubts about the blowing yourself up thing!

  40. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    I’ll take your argument a step further, for it is really what Noam Chomsky’s intent is:expand reparations to Hispanics and Asians.

    So what would a Noam Chomsky Fantasy reparations program be? Like this:free University education for Blacks, Hispanics, Africans ,Carribeans,Muslims,…and Asians…and massive affirmative action preferences for the aforementioned+wiping away the borders of the US.

    So now I’m gonna state the obvious:Noam Chomsky wants to exterminate The Historic Native Born White American Majority via racial reparations and open borders. But Noam does not support the right of return for Palestinians.

  41. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @Eternal Vigilance

    Ronnie is a weirdo Old Hippie with fossilized dingle berries for brain matter roaming the wasteland of his brain…this is your typical Counterpunch…Z Magazine…Earth First Journal Reader.

  42. @Priss Factor

    Mexicans are better than Jews and Negroes if the majority population wants to keep power.

    How’d that work out for California?

    • Replies: @Anon
  43. aandrews says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    God-o-mighty! Would you take a nerve pill and have a nice lie down?? Jesus Christ!
    (And Paul Craig Roberts is a principled guy who sacrificed his financial well-being for not being a go-along-with-the-gag-guy in Washington.)

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  44. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    “How’d that work out for California?”

    Jewish money funded immigration in Ca.

    http://www.vdare.com/posts/sierra-club-sellout-not-forgotten

  45. MarkinLA says:
    @aandrews

    On the principled scale these guys don’t rate as high as you think. Pat was supportive of GOP policies when they sere coming out of Reagan’s pie-hole, same as PCR. They could have actually done something useful then.

  46. @J1234

    After reading this guy’s comment, I get the feeling he’s speaking with great authority when he talks of mental whack-jobs.

    That’s the beauty of Unz’ addition of the ability to permablock selected commenters. Just type the troll’s name into the box and you’ll never again see their drivel. The one in question is a peculiar case however as he treats Unz as his own personal blog and posts comically long winded and mentally challenged comments to every article. Why that’s allowed to continue baffles me.

  47. Jefferson says:
    @Priss Factor

    “Mexicans are better than Jews”

    The per capita murder rate in Mexico is way higher than in Israel. Mexicans are more violent than Jews, this is 100 percent fact. So tell me how are Mexicans better than Jews? Please explain to me how most Mexicans behave like 1st World White Europeans?

    • Replies: @orly
  48. orly says:
    @Jefferson

    per capita murder rates for a country that is at the heart of the war on drugs would likly be high.

    mexico has more people living on less than 4 dollars a day than the total population israel/palestine.

    while every israeli citizen is getting 1000 dollars a day of us aid money.
    with an average of gdp per capita of 40,000 dollars.

    and yet they destroy 20,000 homes and kill over 2000 people in less than 2 weeks

    • Replies: @Jefferson
  49. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factor"] says:

    “The per capita murder rate in Mexico is way higher than in Israel. Mexicans are more violent than Jews, this is 100 percent fact. So tell me how are Mexicans better than Jews? Please explain to me how most Mexicans behave like 1st World White Europeans?”

    I don’t mean mexers are better in the qualitative sense. Of course, Jews are better in intelligence, learning, ability, and etc.

    I mean they are better in being less harmful to whites.

    Because Jews are so good at lots of stuff, they gain lots of power and wealth, and then they use their massive resources to take over all the elite industries and institutions and use their influence to push for stuff like ‘gay marriage’, ‘interracism’, ‘white guilt’, MLK cult, and etc.

    Mexers, in contrast, will just pick lettuce and sell some drugs.

    If US had no Jews, White Americans would still be in charge and would be setting the agenda.

    It’s like blacks are better in sports than whites are, and that is why they are worse for white sports.

    For whites to thrive in sports, it helps to have no or few blacks in America. Whites don’t get much challenge in sports domination from Mexers and yellows, but they get massive challenge from blacks who kick white butt and hump white women.

    So, because blacks are better, they are worse for whites. Jews know this and take delight in the athletic and sexual defeat of whites at the hands of black men.

    • Replies: @jack shindo
  50. Jefferson says:
    @orly

    “per capita murder rates for a country that is at the heart of the war on drugs would likly be high.”

    The reason the per capita murder rate is so high in Mexico is because it is in their racial genes. There is a lot of White meth drug dealers in places like West Virgina yet West Virgina is not a war zone like Mexico. Brown drug dealers on average are just more violent than White drug dealers.

    “mexico has more people living on less than 4 dollars a day than the total population israel/palestine.”

    Mexico has a very high poverty rate because of it’s racial demographics which are not White enough. Mexico is a country full of low IQ Brown people.

    “while every israeli citizen is getting 1000 dollars a day of us aid money.
    with an average of gdp per capita of 40,000 dollars.

    “and yet they destroy 20,000 homes and kill over 2000 people in less than 2 weeks”

    Killing Islamic terrorists is not the same as regular street crime homicides. Also 2,000 homicides is a typical weekend for Mexico.

    Does not change the fact that the per capita murder rate in Israel is still below the world average. Israel is safer than most countries in the world in terms of violent street crime. The same can not be said for Mexico who’s per capita murder rate is well above the world average.

    It is not really debatable that Jews are racially superior to Mexicans. The world’s 18 million Jews have produced way more successful people than the world’s 154 million Mexicans. Mexicans are the epitome of failure and mediocrity.

    • Replies: @orly
  51. orly says:
    @Jefferson

    the reason for israel low street crime, is because every street has if not active soldier on it, off duty soldiers carrying their rifles or other heavily armed citizen.

  52. orly says:

    “It is not really debatable that Jews are racially superior to Mexicans. The world’s 18 million Jews have produced way more successful people than the world’s 154 million Mexicans. Mexicans are the epitome of failure and mediocrity.”

    fine!
    i’ll accept that, but since i was the smartest in my class (in yeshiva) that makes me a smarter than average jew, which makes me superior to you.

    so you are wrong on all points but i have no need to justify my self to an inferior such as your self

    take my word for it after all im a smarter than average Superior Jew.

  53. @Priss Factor

    do you really believe the stuff you are writing, dude?
    USA white people propel the drug trade (remember supply and demand economic theory!) if demand is there then supply is revved up to get the ROI for more product. Yes, the Mixican bring it in based on the demand for the product. It is business just liek racism is a business so each get their own return for their own benefit!

  54. How can I say this easily? Easily!

    Look at the laws of this great nation and you will see who did what to whom if we are truthful in our consciousness. The same people who claimed that they wanted to escape the divine right of monarchial proviledge. did themselves create a democratic monarchy where rights are to be voted on by for some people while the rest are enslaved because it can be done. That has been the reality of what is USA so to claim that animosity to evil must be curtailed is itself evil.
    It must be destroyed in the same manner that the framers of the US Constitution claimed when they stated that tyranny must be put down like a mad dog. The eloquent words may be off but you can check the essential and specific phrasing of said words yourself.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS