The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Emasculated West Primed for A Muscular, Muslim Takeover
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Programmed as they are in feminist myth-making, journalists, young and old, often ask incredulously, “Why would western girls travel to join ISIS fighters?” “ISIS men don’t believe in equality between the sexes.”

At heart, neither do women. Not when hormones rage.

Islamic State projects strength. Strength is an aphrodisiac. Women are biologically programmed to be attracted to powerful men. That’s one reason some girls willingly put on black nose bags and flock to become ISIS brides.

Brainwashed to think biology is incidental, and that men and women are essentially interchangeable; younger readers will likely find it harder to grasp something as primordial and important as the male-female biological category.

Sheikh Muhammad Ayed has no such problem. Speaking in a deep, sonorous voice; in what sounds like classical Arabic, this imam can be observed on YouTube delivering a sermon from East Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque. The object of Sheikh Ayed’s coruscating derision is the emasculated West. It is primed for a muscular, Muslim takeover, he argues.

Said Ayed (as translated by The Middle East Media Research Institute):

“But they have lost their fertility, so they look for fertility in their midst. We will give them fertility! We will breed children with them, because we shall conquer their countries—whether you like it or not, oh Germans, oh Americans, oh French, oh Italians, and all those like you. Take the refugees! We shall soon collect them in the name of the coming Caliphate. We will say to you: These are our sons. Send them, or we will send our armies to you.”

On its side, Islam has ascetic evangelists such as Ayed, who bow to no one.

On our side we have Father Michael Pfleger! He’s the too-hideous-to-behold, standard issue, Western preacher-cum-Obama idolater.

Pray tell: Who looks and sounds more impressive to the young and the impressionable? The impassioned, unapologetic, manly imam in flowing, Lawrence-of-Arabia robes, who channels the Word of his Prophet? Or, Father Pfleger, the soft face of the West’s ultra-liberal faith; a tool of liberal public administration; a man more eager to prostrate himself to Caesar than to serve a higher authority?

Pfleger’s ilk—the West’s priesthood—are in the four corners of the earth preaching hate for their own kind. Thus, in a week in which fifteen blacks wielding Kalashnikovs killed two white farmers in KwaZulu-Natal; another excuse-for-a-man—man-of-the-cloth Michael Vorster—was at a South-African pulpit puling about “the controlling ways of whiteness.”

More so than girls do boys need strong men in their lives—men who affirm their masculinity.When a vulnerable Anglo-American boy hears preachers, parents, pedagogues and politicians pounding on about our country’s Founding Fathers as the archetypical pale, patriarchal oppressors—he quickly learns to reject his country’s heritage and look elsewhere for masculine inspiration, maybe even at Muhammad. After all, American boys, K through Twelve, are mired in an estrogen-infused, cloistered world, where strong men in authority are an endangered minority.

ORDER IT NOW

Religious or irreligious, the generic Western guy is instructed to ooze psychological correctness, but sublimate manliness. He never takes charge; he consults and cooperates. He’s not necessarily effeminate, but he’s safely androgynous (and he’s most certainly not guy-like in the Trumpian sense). As personalities go, this Generic Guy and his wife (oops, “life partner”) are indistinguishable.

The feminization and regulation of Western society over decades has meant that life-saving manliness is confined, increasingly, to corners upon which women are less likely to encroach: the cockpit or combat.

Perhaps this blurring of biological boundaries accounts for why, in Europe, there are no men left to defend the women folk. From Cologne to Hamburg to Stuttgart, the mass molestation of German women by Muslim refugees (hashtag “RapeFugees”) elicits very little outrage from their natural protectors: the remaining fifty percent of the population.

Why, a decadent dilatant named Ralf Jaeger (interior minister for North Rhine-Westphalia), even ventured that “right-wing poisoning of the climate of our society” is “at least as awful as the acts of those assaulting the women.” Father Pfleger and the head of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Francis, would concur. The last scurried to wash the feet of his Christ-like victims: the refugees, not the raped.

Although none was in attendance at the 2016 Democratic National Convention,America still has magnificent men who’re unwilling to relinquish their natural, individual right to proceed against evil.

Men like Mark Vaughan.

In September of 2014, a woman at a Vaughan Foods factory, in Moore, Oklahoma, was beheaded by one Alton Nolen, a young, hateful black man, convert to Islam, who was terrorizing co-workers into doing the same.

Another woman, poor Traci Johnson, was also doing an honest day’s work, when Nolen approached her and began sawing at her throat. Suddenly something marvelously American happened. The boss and CEO, Mr. Vaughan, stopped Nolen in his tracks with a bullet. (What a shame Vaughan didn’t stop the butcher dead in his tracks.)

Survival—of the species of the culture of the faith—has a biological dimension. What would have befallen our Hominid ancestors had they implemented gender parity in their hunter-gatherer societies—sometimes the women hunt while the men forage and mind the kids, and vice versa?

In the service of statist sameness, the male-vs.-female biological imperatives are rapidly, if reflexively, being dissolved. Dissolving “The Constitution of Man” is dangerous to civilization, for a subservient, effete civilization will not survive the onslaught of Islam.

 

ILANA Mercer is the author of “The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed” (June, 2016), and “Into The Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa” (2011). She has been writing a popular, weekly, paleolibertarian column—begun in Canada—since 1999. Ilana’s online homes are www.IlanaMercer.com & www.BarelyABlog.com. Follow her on https://twitter.com/IlanaMercer.

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Islam, Political Correctness 
Hide 206 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. attonn says:

    “European man” is an oxymoron. But “American man” is on his way out as well, just with few-years lag. And I don’t see any hope for a reversal.

  2. The West needs more babes like Ms. Mercer telling their men to come home carrying their shields or being carried upon them rather than things like the refrain of that dreadful anti-war hit, “Billy, Don’t be a Hero.”

    • Replies: @boogerbently
  3. Jason Liu says:

    The most hysterical attacks on masculinity have come from white women. Single white female liberals, young or old, are arguably the most polarized demographic against anything traditional or naturally ordered. The social conditions in the west has bred a generation of infantilized middle class women who, all said and done, are primarily motivated by a fear of men. Over the last few decades, they’ve created and pushed all kinds of moralist and academic sounding rationalizations for this fear, such as “toxic masculinity”, “mansplaining” or “male gaze”. They push tolerance of everything, and relativism of all things, because it makes society less judgmental and therefore less threatening to themselves.

    I’m not saying other races dominate their women (although some do), but at least they don’t privilege their women. A lot of things I hear from white girls would be dismissed as idiotic and not worth talking about if they were a man. Yet white guys stop, listen, and give them attention.

    It was noted by native Americans, then battling white settlers, that Europeans had a soft spot in women, and treated theirs a little too well. Now that behavior has crystallized in the form of feminism, and is infecting the rest of the world. Nationhood is mostly a manifestation of male ethos. If you don’t have that, then you don’t have a nation, just one large and undefined “community”. For yours and everyone elses’ sake, you need to end this gender egalitarianism.

  4. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    For the sake of western people used o read UNZ review I’d please Mr Mercer to well verify all MEMRI translations before to post it, as this is a well known tool of zionist deception.
    Tks

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @WhatEvvs
  5. Isn’t a version of this something that Chateau Heartiste, Roosh, and WhiskeysPlace have been saying for some time? Chicks dig jerks, even violent Muslim jerks!

    And the same women who want male protection in the streets will be the first to run to Human Resources to scream “sexual harassment” if one of those same men asks her for a date in the workplace.

    The “Men Going Their Own Way” Movement makes more and more sense. What’s the point of defending a civilization that despises you?

  6. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    A good article but wonder if it went far enough. In my opinion, the “West” has gone full suicidal mode for quite some time. One reason is that females in their 20’s and 30’s have for years bitched to and about boys/men who where indeed boys and men in the strictest sense and told them they (boys and men) that they were too harsh, too tough, too…MANLY!

    After years of the females (broads) bitching about “Rape Culture” they now have in in their face, at least in Europe, and coming soon to the US. After years of harping about this and that, and boys and men being fed up with said behavior, the females should not expect any real man to rescue them from their own stupidity and arrogance. They have the Beta orbiters and other weaklings for that and will find out that it is not enough in the long-term to keep them (females) “safe”.

    Those of the West are and will continue to get what is deserved.

  7. Rehmat says:

    Mercer your bigotry against Muslim country is obvious by quoting an Israeli lying source ‘The Middle East Media Research Institute’ which authored the notorious claim in 2006 accusing Iranian president Dr. Ahmadinejad of saying: “Wipe Israel off the Map.” Incidentally, three years ago, Israel’s deputy prime minister told Al-Jazeera that Ahmadinejad never said that.

    The western men and women are attracted to US-Israel created ‘macho’ ISIS aka ‘Islamic State’ because they’re recruited by anti-Islam Judeo-Christian groups.

    Mercer if you study some objective source – you would be shocked to learn that three-out-of-four converts to Islam are women and a great majority of them wear hijab as a personal choice. For example, Tony Blair’s sister-in-law Lauren Booth, British journalist and political activist Yvonne Ridley, British TV presenter, artist and author Kristiane Backer, French rapper Mélanie Georgiades, known as Diam’s, Bollywood actress Monica, British writer, journalist and editor Myriam François-Cerrah, to name a few.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/07/04/why-do-they-wear-hijab/

  8. @Jason Liu

    I think Africans noted the same “soft spot” for women in colonists, at least in Kenya. Robert Ruark’s novel Something of Value described an older African tribal leader who admired the colonists’ industriousness and even fighting skills but shook his head at the way white women could manipulate them.

  9. Interesting video of the growling imam. People in the background are just milling around, and nobody is paying attention to him.

    Your article is correct that the east coast elites are at war against masculinity.

    However, there is a reservoir of masculine strength in flyover country. Not coincidentally, your illustration of a man who retains his manhood took place in Oklahoma, not Manhattan.

  10. woman always want to change her man (husband) and when have succes, dont like more. Feminism has done the same whith the society, and now they dont like, therefore the male west is destroyed, and women dont know where are going.Men would not hear never never women.

  11. what a load of nonsense. here’s the thing about strong men: they don’t have to prove it.
    the author calls herself a paleolibertarian. i suppose this brand of ideology means a rejection of modernity. the new often threatens insecure minds. change scares them.
    ideologues of all stripes are followers. they feel a need to be led – like followers of islam or christianity or judaism. ideologues need to be told what to believe, how to behave, how to live. they worship only one way. all other ways are circumspect or just plain wrong. ideologues embrace and constantly and continually reinforce a closed mind. open-mindedness fosters reevaluation and questioning. a closed mind is like a stylus stuck in a vinyl groove: repetition as progress. a closed mind is a form of ignorance.
    imagination changes the world. imagination, wonder, experimentation, delivers humanity to a higher plane.
    the stagnation of ideology suffocates free thought, and with it, the human race.

  12. Quebeker says:
    @martino from barcelona

    Good point.

    I would add that a man who can be nagged/manipulated into ‘changing’, or worse yet, changes on his own volition, will be rewarded by contempt from those very women asking for change in the first place.

    Men never, ever get anywhere with women by the act of amassing brownie points.

  13. attonn says:
    @Jason Liu

    True.
    No man extols the whorish, mercenary behavior of his woman more than the white man. And no woman disdains, backstabs and loathes her man more than a white woman. And if anything, it’s getting worse. That way lies extinction.

  14. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    “Or, Father Pfleger, the soft face of the West’s ultra-liberal faith; a tool of liberal public administration; a man more eager to prostrate himself to Caesar than to serve a higher authority?”

    But he hollers like a wild-ass negro.

    He is manly in his anti-white-ness.

    He sure talked nasty about Hillary in 2008.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  15. The medieval code of chivalry evolved to protect the helpless Christian against the perils of aggression, with orders such as the Knights Templars expressly dedicated to fighting the savage depredations of Mohammedan infidels.

    Then, it was recognized that Christians, having accepted the Word as the message of Christ, were bound by oath not to defend themselves against attack.

    We can see parallels in the dilemma of today’s soft-handed liberal. He is incapable of defending himself, his spouse, his homeland and everything he holds dear.

    We need to get beyond our skepticism and disbelief at this phenomenon. It simply is. It is a product of his having taken an oath of non-violence which he holds to irrespective of the severity of the assault against him.

    Again, we should not be irritated by his passivity. Rather, we should see things in a new light and accept that is that it is up to us, the fighting Knights to defend him.

    The challenge then is organize able-bodied men into trained groups and take the battle directly to the enemy–invading Muslims in European cities and feral blacks in America’s.

    What is needed is a new crusade. We able-bodied men have, in a sense, neglected our duty in that we have been waiting for the liberal weakling to finally wake up and show some signs of manliness. But this he cannot do.

    It is up to us, the virile, to rally and defend our women, children and yes, liberal men. It is we who must organize. It’s time to recognize that none will do it for us because they cannot be expected to do it for themselves.

    Time to strap on your greaves, men, heft your sword, shield and spear and march out into the line of battle with your fellows. The weaklings among us need us to protect them.

    Stop blaming liberals for our problems. They are only doing what they are capable of doing. We, on the other hand, can fight, so we have no excuse.

  16. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    “Religious or irreligious, the generic Western guy is instructed to ooze psychological correctness, but sublimate manliness.”

    OTOH, there is rap thug culture, tattoo culture, sports mania, biggus-dickus-mania, MMA popularity, mockery of geeks and nerds, and etc.

    The West worships rough rapper thugs and whoopsy-doo homos.

    Weirdly schizo.

    • Replies: @attonn
  17. […] Source: Emasculated West Primed For A Muscular, Muslim Takeover […]

  18. attonn says:
    @Priss Factor

    It’s called “faux masculinity”, a desperate try of young males to resemble a man, be something that they have little to no understanding or knowledge of. It’s all hat and no cattle, all form and no substance. The more pathetic the creature, the more tattoos it has.
    Put these “toughs” into a real combat (unaided by technology) – and they’ll be turning into the squealing little girls within minutes, without fail.

    • Agree: Andrei Martyanov
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  19. attonn says:
    @Threecranes

    You will never assemble a viable fighting force with a present white Christian birthrate of 1.3 children per woman. The slow death is already baked in, whether you fight or not. In fact, with this kind of demographics, fighting will only accelerate white race’s inevitable checkout from this Earth.

  20. @Lawrence Fitton

    With your all too predictable praise of innovation and open mindedness for the sake of innovation and open mindedness, you sound like a broken record. We’ve heard this spiel a million times. All you people manage to do is spend vast amounts of energy and time reinventing the wheel.

    Let me enlighten you with a Zen saying (paraphrased): “If you find a trail in the mountains, stick to it.”

    If that is too opaque for your brain, here’s what it means in practical terms. From having hiked many times in steep mountains, I can attest to the truth of the observation that getting off the beaten track and bushwhacking often results in running into unclimbable sheer walls or precipices that defy decent (unless equipped with climbing gear–but that’s a different kettle of fish).

    • Replies: @Lawrence Fitton
  21. @attonn

    Don’t give up before the battle is even joined.

    Remember, our enemies are a disorganized rabble of cowards who attack women and old men. They are no match for us.

    • Replies: @attonn
  22. attonn says:
    @Threecranes

    Joined? By whom? By the only child of the single mother? Please….

    You may think you can fly, but the force of gravity has its own opinion. Try and see what happens.

    When numbers don’t work, nothing works. And the numbers simply don’t work for the white man anymore.

    Even your fine fighting spirit, I suspect, is safely limited to the confines of your basement.

  23. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Academia is just Acadogma

  24. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Jason Liu

    Gender egalitarism is born and thrives in societies no more exposed to threats.

    Middle class white women have been instructed to be anti-male by high class high-testosterone masculine butches who have one or two reasons to develop very rough complexes of inferiority with respect to men — most of them are shapeless, or at least odd blends of manly and womanly, if you pay attention to that.

    But why do these parasitic ideologies spread by very tiny fraction of sick people within society gain traction? Because the host body is lifeless on its own.
    Masochistic deranged feminism isn’t the killer of masculinity. The death of masculinity has given free rein to the former.

    The more a society lives in comfort, and physical strength becomes a low-value asset, and the more profound, meaningful culture fades, the more women will not see any more the difference between the sexes.

    But the difference is there, physical, as well as intellectual.
    And a lot of middl-class, as well as mid-low-class white women are made unhappy by our day’s deranged feminism, while they are unable to track down the cause of their unhappiness: thus it happens that their unhappiness reinforces their faith in ideology, id est, makes them still more feminist.

  25. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @attonn

    Other people’s fertility is dropping too, and it will continue to drop.

    Plus, whites (including Ashkenazis) will continue to be the more intelligent, and hold much, if not all, of the power.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  26. @attonn

    My home doesn’t have a basement.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Karl
  27. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    This Father Pfleger is a complete nut…I am surprised he hasn’t been sanctioned by the Catholic church.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  28. @Threecranes

    thank you for reinforcing my point. as for your beaten path metaphor ~ ‘i have taken the road less traveled by and that has made all the difference.’
    without innovation, civilization would be stuck in the stone age. then you would have to call me names with smoke signals.
    oh, and the author of the quote can be found by using an innovation called the google. pretty sure he was a manly man. although he wrote poetry, so he could have been a girly man.

  29. Truth says:
    @Threecranes

    WELL BE A GOSH DURN MAN AND DIG ONE!

  30. @Diversity Heretic

    Most of the MGTOW guys are lame and androgynous anyway. Going your own way is a convenient viewpoint and path when you can’t get a woman to love in any case. Roosh and and that fat Forney and the rest of that ilk are some of the ugliest bastards there are, their “exploits” are false and contrived and meaningless. Given their advice is mostly nonsensical as regards handling broads, when called on it, they ban their readers. Sour grapes types. Heartist and DalRock are pretty good and the writers here, at Taki’s and on Stacy McCain’s site are the realists, but they aren’t advising how to handle it all, their readers already know how. MGTOW? Again, sour grapes.

    It is a downfall. Women in the big cities rich in feminist study, big university and politics (DC was my hell, but there were lots of women dying to let out their inner Monica Lewinski for a blue collar guy after a day out on the bike) are well and truly indoctrinated and they are indeed unhappy and they don’t even know why. They drink, they get laid, they work. So, you cope. When the women don’t need the men for the noble stuff, then go ahead and use them and allow them to use you for the good stuff, getting laid.

    Broads. No sex without them, can’t live with them, not allowed to kill them. But make no mistake, they aren’t smarter, as strong, nor as smart as the men. In any scenario, they’re weak. Even in the feminist times we find ourselves, women require massive support from men. At tge grass roots, they’re killed chivalry. Most of the women out there, I wouldn’t piss on em if they were on fire. They killed that in men, chivalry. How’s it working?

    Muslims? Half-a-fag types, full-on homo when no one is watching and they’ll even rape animals. Not too bright, but they do certainly cause a stir, no? When stood up to, they disappear.

    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
    , @Rehmat
  31. Men will stop defending women soon, you can see that in Germany and Sweden, and it is the same everywhere. Likewise many men are simply refusing to have families, they are losing faith in women.

    As more women, and their allies gay and very liberal men move into positions of authority within government and more men are increasingly locked out, they will find it harder and harder to raise families and find reliable women to marry.

    The progressives and women are relying on technology and some fantasy that they will take over the world with their liberal ideas. They are stupid and depraved. Wars are won by heart and virtue and sacrifice and that is fading quickly in the west. In fact America would never win a war without its air superiority, and that is now fading fast with missile technology able to destroy any bird within minutes.

    Any society run by women and effeminate men will not stand, it never has in history, and never will because men will simply not fight for it. They have been told many lies, but generally the average man can see when he is being treated like dirt.

    • Agree: Jeff77450
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  32. @Anonymous

    They’ll keep enough White men around to keep the lights and water and sewer on, manage the groceries, design and fly the planes. Otherwise, they’re by and large done with White men.

  33. @attonn

    The birthrate of Whites ought to also take into account the tens of millions of White Euro-men killed during WW1, 2, Korea and Vietnam and plenty died in all the time in between. White men have been on a suicide run for a long time.

  34. @martino from barcelona

    Hagamos un trato Martino– Tú dejas de intentar escribir en inglés y te prometo no intentar escribir in catalán. (cosa que ni la menor puta idea tengo como hacer)

    Así creo que alcanzarás mayor comprension con mayor audencia aquí en este foro aún usando el castellano.

  35. @Rehmat

    A man that makes knee jerk anti-Jewish posts has no credibility when it comes to bigotry.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Rehmat
  36. Marcus says:
    @Jason Liu

    Magua understands that the white man is a dog to his women

    • Replies: @Clyde
  37. Corvinus says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    “The “Men Going Their Own Way” Movement makes more and more sense. What’s the point of defending a civilization that despises you?”

    MGTOW makes absolutely NO sense. Those adherents falsely believe that civilization has betrayed them. If they want to steer clear from women, let them.

  38. Corvinus says:
    @Pat the Rat

    “Men will stop defending women soon, you can see that in Germany and Sweden, and it is the same everywhere. Likewise many men are simply refusing to have families, they are losing faith in women.”

    Men are continuing to defend women, continuing to have families, continuing to have faith in women and their fellow men.

    • Replies: @Marcus
  39. Corvinus says:
    @attonn

    “The slow death is already baked in, whether you fight or not. In fact, with this kind of demographics, fighting will only accelerate white race’s inevitable checkout from this Earth.”

    The white race is not going to die off. There is no genocide taking place.

    • Replies: @helena
  40. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Are those Muslim men H1B positive in manhood?

  41. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    Did you look at the pope lately?

  42. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Steven Spielberg wants Idris Elba to play 007 and hump white shikses.

    Jews seem to push the castration of white men. And they use blacks and Muslims to do this.

    ‘Murica:

    https://goodbyeamericainaphoto.wordpress.com/

  43. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    http://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2016/08/01/britain-needs-a-competiveness-shake-up/

    Sheesh, maybe the UK services wouldn’t be as clogged if UK didn’t have so many useless immigrants.

  44. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    https://stream.org/look-inside-4-important-goals-lgbt-movement/

    ‘Emasculation’ is too mild to describe the state of the West.

    It’s gone full-homo.

    https://stream.org/look-inside-4-important-goals-lgbt-movement/

  45. @Jim Christian

    I appreciate your comment and your insight. Maybe MGTOW are losers, I’ve only seen a few videos, but the name sure is catchy. Roosh I generally don’t read, but I’m aware of him. Chateau Heartiste’s Six Sirenes of the Sexual Apocalypse (up from Four) brilliantly sums up the various influences that are leading to societal destruction. I guess that I’m just weary of commentators (e.g., Charles Murray) telling men to “man up,” without considering the broader context of why men find themselves in the situations that they do.

    I spent nineteen years in DC. I’ll put it this way: I didn’t know game, and it showed.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
    , @WhatEvvs
  46. Marcus says:
    @Corvinus

    Not so much in Western Europe, e.g. the one man who tried to defend women from Muslim rapists in Cologne is an ethnic Croat, and he was investigated for racism as a result.

  47. Max Payne says:

    You white people are weird.

    Seriously just beat your women from time to time. They need to learn that outside the Western walls of civilization men are not going to treat them the same and hippy communist comments like “genders don’t matter”, “we’re all equal” or (my personal favorite) “the laws of physics change all the time” need to be BEATEN out of women.

    You just can’t reason with retardation like that.

    If you’re a bit more coy and have some understanding in social engineering it would be better to emotionally and psychologically abuse your woman. First it doesn’t leave marks and the damage is much more lasting. You know. Ignore her (especially if she did something to grab your attention), don’t answer her calls, maintain an illusion she is just one of many women, remind her of her incompetence all the time, for every compliment you give her also throw in a semi-insult so the compliment doesn’t go to her head (“your hair looks really nice… but whats with the low-class looking earrings? You think that matches the hair design?”)

    If you’re woman isn’t cowering in the corner huddled in fear when you come home through the door then you’ve failed as a man in maintaining your dominance. That goes double for children. God when I see a (white) parent talk to their impudent 8 year old as if they were an adult it makes me cringe… JUST BEAT THAT WEAK ASS CHILD! Won’t give you any lip after that.

    Like the song says:

    I beat my wife with the back of my hand.
    I beat my wife when her cooking is bland.
    I beat my wife when she talks back to me.
    I beat my wife if she votes Hillary!

    • Replies: @Truth
  48. bunga says:

    [Pick one handle and stick with it, or use Anonymous/Anon. Otherwise your comments may get trashed.]

    “The neocons’ underlying motive, I believe, is absolute security for America’s colony in the Middle East, Israel – put another way, their concern is for Israel’s hegemony over its entire region with no room for anyone else to act in their own interests. It is only if the United States is deeply engaged all over the planet that Israel can constantly benefit from its strange relationship with America.
    ……
    Ordinary Americans are not interested in world affairs, and there is a great deal of evidence to support that statement. American Imperialists of earlier times disparaged this tendency to just want peace at home with the pejorative name, isolationism and avoiding isolationism became an excuse for a whole series of wars and interventions.”
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/08/no_author/lurching-towards-wwiii/
    Now this author has reduced the dialogue of war from between the militaries and between the ruling classes to among or between the common folks in the hope of aiding to uninterrupted military engagement of the western society , so that Israel doesn’t suffer and continues to benefit.

  49. KenH says:

    The cowardice and effeteness of Western European man did not happen in a vacuum. Decades of holocaust propaganda and racial guilt tripping of the Germans and to a lesser extent all Western Europeans for their colonial past have taken their toll as well as the “anti-hate” laws which prevent them from speaking out about their dispossession.

    Western Europeans could make short shrift of the Muslims in their midst if only they were allowed to be the warriors that they once were which might be next to impossible given the collective lobotomy they’ve undergone. Or, if Western European governments would reject globalism and multiculturalism and heed the wishes of its own people instead of the Muslim interlopers.

  50. cipher says:

    Man-up and make the ultimate sacrifice!

    [for all the sluts and mudsharks who’d never give a noble man so much as the time of day]

    No, thank you.

  51. @Diversity Heretic

    Well, released from marriage (I’m not haaaapy), 1992 or so was a grand time in Washington. Women weren’t fouled yet, for the most part. Never a tatt, piercing or blue hair, not then. Men were the same in the offices, pale, short, fat, weak. Those 15 years were quite a party for a 6’2″ phone guy with a pocket fulla dough and motorcycles and handguns they could shoot. Women are SO bored by the average guy. Terror and a little adventure was my “game”, but I didn’t know it, I was just a bit of a nut maybe. Roosh was down there then having a bad time with broads, but then, look at him. Anyway, DC then, Clinton’s times up until 9/11, was good times.

    I’m in Boston now. These days, even with the bike, I romance the women with lobsters and wine, but they, as I, are a little more advanced in age. Good times still.

    Later.

    • Replies: @grapesoda
  52. Clyde says:
    @Marcus

    How did Magua manage to keep head shaved clean? His death was the best scene in that movie.

  53. The decline of the West has little to do with declining masculinity or the triump of feminism, these are symptoms not causes of western decline. Everyone becomes a little soft and complacent in an affluent industrialised, society but not all soft industrialised societies welcome dangerous foreigners. The modern Japanese male isn’t exactly very masculine, yet he has the good sense not to import lots of dangerous foreigners. Why? because he has a pragmatic collectivist mind set rather than a liberal, individualistic one.

    There are plenty of liberal white males, like the anti-hero in the novel Camp of the Saints who think that conservatives are sissies who oppose immigration because they are frightened of foreigners. Indeed liberal ideology is peppered with words based on the idea that conservatives are fearful individuals – xenophobia, homophobia, etc.

    Forget the pop psychology and focus on the imbalanced ideology which is driving the west to destroy itself.

    • Replies: @helena
    , @Jason Liu
  54. Alden says:

    One correction: not one European or American girl has gone off to house Isis

    Everyone was a Muslim living in Europe or America.

    I agree with most of the article except for the canard that the women who ran off to join Isis were Europeans.

    As for the Palestinian Iman yammering away about out breedingEuropeans, he and his congregation are under the thumb of a very hostile occupation by Israel.

  55. Wally says: • Website
    @Quartermaster

    Man up and take it like everyone else, Quartermaster.

    Rehmat is merely criticizing the obvious behaviour of Jews.

    And who is it that demands massive immigration into Europe and the US, but demands that non-Jew immigration be prevented into “that shitty little country”?

  56. Alden says:
    @Threecranes

    We had an organization like that in the south eastern states of America. It was destroyed by the federal government after about 100 years of successfully protecting women from rape.

  57. utu says:

    Typical pro Israel propaganda for this author. Today it is shaming Europeans to be more like Israel, right?

  58. Only the fools are emasculated and they never counted to being with. The brunt endure, which is what men do (and real women too).

  59. helena says:
    @Corvinus

    It has already been predicted by biologists. European genes won’t go away, they will infuse into the new mixed race population(s). We’re talking hundreds of years but crucially, once the % white gets down to a certain level, the south africa situation develops and the onus becomes on white people to blend in or suffer the fate of a very very unpopular ghetto. That point is just about reached hence the political explosion taking palce on either side of the Atlantic. The UK has had it basically. The areas outside cities are beginning to start political campaigns to end discrimination. That’s the first step towards becoming minority-dominated as they say in UK.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  60. Rurik says:

    yes, very good article and very important, vigorous, existential thrust

    with the notable exception of this guy

    and him

    http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Home.aspx

    (and perhaps a few marginalized others), the Christian leadership of the world seems to me to be a nunnery of sniveling cowards, Judases, pole smokers, venal liars and pedophiles. Going all the way up to the Poop. And the leadership of the gay worshiping mainstream protestants and the Jew worshiping, bloodthirsty evangelicals hell-bent on slaughtering every last Palestinian Christian man, woman and child.

    I have a thousand times more respect for Mel Gibson than all those Godless worms and snakes slithering around the corridors of our ancient and noble heritage that are the cathedrals our ancestors built to honor their God(s).

    Men like the Poop are an abomination to those ancestors and the spiritual truths they were willing to die for. Plopping his distended ass there in the Vatican, he is a sacrilege, and all of those boy rapists he’s been anointed to protect and vouchsafe for. God damn them all to Hell.

    someone mentioned Heartiste. And I agree, this is what they’ve been saying now for a long time. They even have a thread with photos to document the decline (plunge into the abyss)

    https://goodbyeamericainaphoto.wordpress.com/

    someone mentioned of the above photo, and that looking at that, how could the Muslim world not want to come over and put every last one of us to the sword?

    reminds me of that scene in Braveheart where the king mentioned what an enemy would do to England if they took one look at his ‘gentle son’..

    but as someone else also mentioned, this is all by design by the usual suspects

    and yes, it can be a temptation to just forsake the women of your tribe, once they too have been turned against you, and simply decide to use them for libertine distraction and amusement, never committing to any kind of relationship, that being difficult with a person indoctrinated into the depraved mire of modern political correctness.

    but there is hope. As the author mentions, there is a dearth of men out there, and a vacuum of angst and despair in the depths the womenfolk. Once you decide to make it a hobby of filling that gaping void of their souls with manly virtues, and give them their needed solace, you’ll find that many of them are in earnest craving the very thing they’ve been programmed to spurn. And you’ll find that by leading them and playing your role, they’ll respond with infinite gratitude and gushing receptivity.

    the lesson of Heartiste

    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/

    is to make the best of today’s circumstances, and live your life as a repudiation of the ubiquitous lies and demonic yoke strangling our civilization. Laugh at them, and mock them, and the gals will love you for it.

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @dahoit
  61. @Threecranes

    “It is a product of his having taken an oath of non-violence which he holds to irrespective of the severity of the assault against him. Again, we should not be irritated by his passivity. Rather, we should see things in a new light and accept that is that it is up to us, the fighting Knights to defend him.” I’m not defending anyone that isn’t close by, I did that already, I’m not certain what we have is worth defending anymore anyway.

    Those teams of able-bodied men you would have clean up Blacks in America would find themselves facing their own police, FBI and U.S. Marshals. I don’t disagree what ought to be done, but you need to maintain practicality here. We can defend our own homes and stand our ground on the street, but going active against those who claim the “monopoly on violence” would have other ideas about your proposed anarchy.

    It would take an invasion equal to the Marines in Fallujah in Iraq going door to door killing thousands to clean up the guns and get all the bad guys in even one city’s ghetto. Those folks, like the Muslims in Iraq, hide among the civilians, the innocent. I don’t know the situation that would initiate the taking of ghettos. It isn’t necessary. Bottle them up, feed them, house them in place, let them kill each other. Pretty much what we’re doing now. Good advice out in the world, too. In the end, you can’t kill everyone.

  62. Carl says:
    @Lawrence Fitton

    Yeah man like free your mind to imagination and stuff, yeah? You’ll take humanity to a higher plane dude if you just like open your mind, ok? cool

    • LOL: Che Guava
  63. Talha says:
    @Rurik

    Dear Rurik,

    A more masculine Western man is in order – also a more feminine Western woman. The question is, how does one get back on track after the train has been derailed. This I do not know the answer to – is there any civilization that has picked itself back up once it has cut itself off from its traditional mores and started on that perilous road of decline?

    As far as the ‘growling’ (as some have stated) imam in the video, I am not too impressed honestly. This sounds too much like; all bark and no bite (people in the video seem to be doing their own thing – who knows if anybody is listening). People in desperate situations (it seems he is out of Palestine) often puff themselves up to compensate. I’m not sure it is a ‘masculinity’ that is deeply impressive to a Western female.

    However, this interpretation of masculinity is embedded in deep spiritual roots and understanding. Here the speaker is a Welsh convert and Shafi’i scholar with spiritual roots in the B’Alawi chain; his perspicacious grasp of the confusion of the age (using a contemporary example) is much more intellectually sound and convincing (at least to me):

    May God preserve the people of the West and their progeny.

  64. helena says:
    @unpc downunder

    Check out (if u havent already) Thosewhocansee blogspot latest research – conclusion: progressivism is a genetic adaptation to lack of ‘predators’.

    Also nobabies.net – civilisations collapse for the same reason cells die; cycles.

    Both the above make sense but isn’t it still worth talking about the decline of acceptability of white macho identity and the rise of feminism and homotransphilia?

    I was thinking about the UK attitude to Trump’s Wall the other day and a discussion about whether Mexico would pay for it and whether saying they would was a lie or not. And I thought to myself – seriously,

    if Trump got elected and the idea of the wall was legal, are we seriously suggesting that Americans, the descendents of people who made the most incredible migration the world has ever seen (because it resulted in the creation of a civilisation out of wilderness) couldn’t set to and build a wall themselves?

    And then I thought, supposing European Americans, Mexicans, and African Americans were each given a route and neccessary equipment and materials – which wall would be built first and/or straightest?

  65. Che Guava says:
    @Anonymous

    I am aware, from reading, that MEMRI often posts untruths and exaggerations,

    if you want to claim that the quotes Ilana has used here are untrue, give us the real translation.

    Doubt that you would be able to come up with anything much different, without a lie, on this one.

  66. Forget this primordial biological urge nonsense. It’s impossible to justify any conclusion based on the decisions of a small group of flaky women. Following their repressed biological urges, or bent on self destruction, damn the consequences to anyone else? If you ask me, I would bet on the latter. This does not mean that the actions of these lost souls has no meaning. Ultimately, a socety’s success depends on the willingness and ability of its individual members to discover, develop, and build on their individual strengths, and to cohesively link those strengths together in a manner that is beneficial to both the individual and society as a whole. There is a big difference between some twisted psychopath looking and sounding “virile” and “manly” on a youtube video and actual manly strength. Clearly our society, by elevating such abstract concepts as equality and fairness and justice and diversity to a higher moral place, has lost its way. We have lost, or are losing, the ability to distinguish right from wrong, good from evil, strength from weakness, competence from incompetence, sanity from insanity, truth from fiction, and reality from fantasy. Look at the manly Hillary and the feminine pompom waving cheerleader Tim Keane on top of the democratic ticket. Is there any wonder why many find Trump to be the more appealing choice?

  67. Emasculated West Primed for A Muscular, Muslim Takeover

    Gawd, how can it get more hysterical than that?

    FYI it’s a class war, Honey, and always has been. Have people really been that dumbed down that they believe it’s the Muzzies agin the rest of us?

    • Agree: edNels
    • Replies: @Stonehands
  68. Rurik says:

    Dear Talha,

    always a pleasure my friend

    I agree that the ‘growling imam’ seems to be an ignored old fool, struggling with his impotence and despair, and like so many (pardon the expression) niggers, he’s lashing out at a world that has wronged him and his people, and he wants psychic revenge.

    I watched the video you posted, and the guy seems reasonable enough, except for a couple of things. For one, the Star Wars director wasn’t giving the people of the West what they want, but rather was giving the people of the West what he figured they should have, IOW more political correctness soul-rot. We’ve been inundated with it for so many decades now, that I guess the Islamic scholar can’t distinguish it from the healthy culture that perseveres in the hearts and souls of Western man (and women).

    We’re really not that different from Islamic men and women. We too understand, instinctively and intuitively that there is a difference between the sexes, and that we have different roles to play, and that rather than considering each other rivals, or enemies, that we should complement each other, and therein lies the harmony and meaning of life. (and true happiness ; )

    But then it is the West, and not Islam that has been under such relentless, decades long cultural onslaught. Our media and entertainment are our most ruthless enemy.

    The scholar in the video points to the Westerner; “white men, white women” as using feminism as a imperial weapon against Islam, but this is so very wrong, that I can’t emphasis this enough! Feminism has been a weapon of the usual suspects to degrade and destroy the fundamental foundations of the West itself! To pit woman against man, and girl against boy. It is us that have suffered this more than anyone. And tragically, it is the women who’re the biggest pitiful victims of this devil’s anti-human screed. Millions upon millions of Western women are barren and alone or living with cats, having been seduced by the false gods of feminism.

    and it isn’t just Islam that suffers the drones and assorted atrocities visited upon them by the Zio-West, but Ukraine, and Serbia too. In fact when the Zio-Fiend was bombing Serbia into submission, they were doing so on behalf of imperialist Islamic terrorists and drug traffickers. I know that must sound like an oxy-moron to you, but it’s well documented

    http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/KLA-Linked-To-Enormous-Heroin-Trade-Police-2932516.php

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2000/01/heroin-heroes

    So, while I agree with the scholar’s points on the general degradation of culture and the human experience by Hollywood, (and the usual suspects), I think what he’s missing is that this scourge isn’t only targeted at Islam, but at those of us in the West too. In fact we’re suffering it more than anyone. Radical feminism and radical homosexuality and radical political correctness, with its implication that whites are all guilty and everyone else a victim, is what is destroying our world, and threatening everyone elses, including Islam.

    We share a common enemy Talha, I guess is my point. The day the Zionist vampire is dislodged from our necks, is the day that Germany and Palestine and all the other countries of the West and East and in between, can finally, at long last breath free. And not until then.

    So in the meantime I would just point out that before there was a zio-tick latched onto our central nervous system, the West had no problem with Islam, other than a few Barbary pirates here and there. Nor did we all have to scratch our heads at the revelation that women were just men with tits, and who needed a man “like a fish needed a bicycle”. We had to have Betty Friedman (why does she look exactly like Madelyn Albright?

    and Gloria Steinem and others

    to explain all that to us.

    the carnage from all that is just being felt today by so many gullible Western women who were seduced by these lies

    May the Gods grant us all peace ~ and a lover and spouse/mate who brings us true happiness.

    • Replies: @Talha
  69. Rehmat says:
    @Quartermaster

    A man who follows anti-Christian Talmud has no credibility to lecture others not to hate Jews.

    On October 27, 2015, Arthur Topham appeared in a British Columbia court to defend his freedom of speech rights. He is accused by B’nai B’rith of inciting hatred toward Canadian Jewish community (310,000 in country’s population of 35 million). BC province is home to 32,000 Jews.

    Topham is also accused of believing anti-Jewish ‘conspiracy theories’ like The Protocols, 9/11, etc. and re-blogging anti-Israel articles from other websites. If convicted, Topham will spend some time in a jail, in addition to a heavy fine and his website, Radical Press, would be removed from internet – like British vicar Stephen Sizer‘s personal blog 7 months ago.

    Terry Wilson, ex-anti-hate crime squad detective had accused Arthur Topham of quoting anti-Jew statements from Elizabeth Dillings’ book, The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today. While cross-examining, Topham’s defense lawyer asked Wilson if he had read Ms Dillings’ book, he replied that he did. When further questioned that if he had cross-checked the book’s allegations with Talmud, Wilson admitted that he had never read Talmud. However, Wilson lauded Talmud as one of Jews “Holy” books and attempting to convince the Jury that any negative criticism of it was just pure anti-Semitism and hatred (here).

    Israeli historian, late professor Israel Shahak in his epic book, Jewish History Jewish Religion, has exposed Talmud’s hatred of non-Jewish people, particularly hatred toward Jesus (as) his mother Saint Mary (as) and Christianity.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/10/30/talmud-in-canadian-court/

  70. Rehmat says:

    “I say AMEN to your prediction of ‘Muslim takeover of the West’,” Rabbi Baruch Efrati, in the Israel-occupied West Bank.

    As I said in 2013: “With the help of G-d, the Gentile (non-Jewish) will adopt a healthier life with a lot of modesty and integrity, and not like the hypocritical Christianity which appears pure but is fundamentally corrupt.”

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/01/02/rabbi-islamization-of-europe-is-good-for-jews/

  71. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The Western white male subconsciously recognizes his emasculated nature and is embarrassed by it, though subconsciously. If he is young it is expressed through sports and pecifically MMA w/or tattoos. If he is older and weaker with low T, he expresses it through being tough warmongerness. Due to his emasculated nature, he is subservient to political correctness. So he chooses the only only white Christian country– the only country and people it is acceptable to target by politically correct standards– to show his aggression towards. Any hostility to any other country makes you, well, Hitler. Or at best Hitler-esque. And when Russia displays its white maleness and masculinity, it makes the gelded Western white males even crazier in aggressive talk.

    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov
  72. Corvinus says:
    @helena

    “It has already been predicted by biologists.”

    Who are these biologists? What research are you discussing here?

    “We’re talking hundreds of years but crucially, once the % white gets down to a certain level, the south africa situation develops and the onus becomes on white people to blend in or suffer the fate of a very very unpopular ghetto.”

    This “south africa situation”, what does it all entail? Is it a theory? By whom?

    “The UK has had it basically. The areas outside cities are beginning to start political campaigns to end discrimination. That’s the first step towards becoming minority-dominated as they say in UK.”

    No, that’s the first step toward liberty.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @helena
  73. @attonn

    Okay, I answered you flippantly before, but now will take the time to answer you straight.

    I’m not claiming to be a hero, but I’m not a weak wannabe basement dweller who only imagines doing Knightly deeds of altruistic good.

    I am the guy who rescued a drowning swimmer by swimming her 250 yards to shore in a cold northern lake. I was the first one to run to the rescue of two old ladies who were trapped in their overturned car when they drove over a small cliff into a grove of saplings, hauling them out one by one and then reassuring them until I heard the sirens approaching, when I left. I did intervene in an armed robbery, exposing myself to danger and had a pistol held to my head as a consequence, when I was the only bystander to speak up rationally and cooly to the assailants. We,meaning our group of victims, were fortunate in not having any of our party murdered, as had others (as we found out later at the trial).

    Okay, you can laugh and call me a Boy Scout doing a good deed daily and admittedly, none of these will alter the Earth in its orbit but they do demonstrate that I’m not a passive dreamer. I pride myself on keeping myself fit enough so that I can make a contribution when I’m needed and not be a net drain. What more can an ordinary citizen do?

  74. I stopped attending church decades ago. Christianity has become effeminate.

  75. Che Guava says:
    @Threecranes

    The medieval code of chivalry evolved to protect the helpless Christian against the perils of aggression, with orders such as the Knights Templars expressly dedicated to fighting the savage depredations of Mohammedan infidels.

    Then, it was recognized that Christians, having accepted the Word as the message of Christ, were bound by oath not to defend themselves against attack.

    If you had read a little history, you would know what nonsense you spout.

    Started to make an educational reply, but clearly from your post, it seems pointless. A minor troll of some variety, occultist or muslim, someone who takes The da Vinci Code as history, or just a simpleton.

  76. Che Guava says:
    @Corvinus

    Ilana was born in Sth. Africa. She has published a book Into the Cannibal’s Pot, which I gather extrapolates from there.

    Apologies to Ilana for not having bought it yet, I have a serious overwork problem on top of a bad injury.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  77. @Diversity Heretic

    “What’s the point of defending a civilization that despises you?”

    Because what replaces it will hunt you down, **s rape you and kill you and rape you again.

  78. Now the real guilt is the ”emasculated” men…

    next post

    ”the guilt is the pokemon go”

    (((is not)))*

  79. Rurik says:
    @Che Guava

    She has published a book Into the Cannibal’s Pot

    I just perused her Wiki page, and it seems the lady is quite an enigma. Intriguing to say the least.

    If I have it right, her family left S. Africa for Israel due to her dad’s anti-Apartheid activism, and then she wrote a book lamenting the loss of white rule in S. Africa? And calling it a “murder of civilization”.

    Isn’t that curious?

    her support of Israel is qualified, but inviolate

    and she also supports borders for the US and Donald Trump

    if I were permitted to ask the lady one question, it would be what is the meaning of the cover of the book Into the Cannibal’s Pot?

    • Replies: @L.K
    , @Che Guava
  80. Andrei Martyanov [AKA "SmoothieX12"] says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    True to a degree. The good step will be to look at the backgrounds of people who constitute American “elites”. Here is the level of one of them, but while a complete immature cretin, the guy is in many respects representative of thoughts many in US “elites” do have, just don’t articulate them openly.

    https://lawfareblog.com/ill-fight-putin-any-time-any-place-he-cant-have-me-arrested

    A lot, and I mean a lot of it also derives from the fact that US is not conditioned by continental warfare.

  81. Biff says:

    As the Anglo/Zionist war machine ravages the planet we are supposed to fear a loosely affiliated group of losers, and their dumb blonde counterparts.

    • Replies: @edNels
  82. Anne says:

    When discussing the Catholic priesthood in the latter part of the 20th century and in the 21st century, historians and polemicists should be aware that it is arguable that since 1969, with the alteration of the rite of ordination of priests and the total revision of the rite of episcopal consecration, all ordinations to the priesthood in the new rite are of doubtful validity and the priests should be re-ordained in the traditional rite. The faithful should not attend their Masses. Also, there is a strong case that all the episcopal consecrations are absolutely null and utterly void because the traditional Western rite was scrapped and an Eastern-Rite ceremony for the installation of a patriarch was substituted—not even a rite of consecration. For that reason, then, the priesthood in the Catholic Church has almost ceased to exist, as has its central act of worship. Most of the men acting as priests are not really priests; the bishops are not bishops, and the popes after Pius XII have not been popes. Bergoglio pope? Nope. For information, visit novusordowatch.org and traditionalmass.org/articles/. Do read Patrick Henry Omlor, Robber Council.

    • Agree: Intelligent Dasein
  83. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    This may be true in the urban areas, but there is a large portion of the male population that the MSM would lead people to believe no longer exists. The fact that there are record breaking gun sales month after month, and conceal carry is at an all time high and growing in leaps and bounds bare this out. Mohammad and other vermin don’t fly in my neck of the woods.

  84. @The Alarmist

    I can’t help but believe Ms Mercer is as guilty as the next female her age in the vaginification of the American male. She is at least smart enough, now, to regret her part in the process.

  85. helena says:
    @Corvinus

    Steve Jones and others. Nobabies.net. TFR Europeans < replacement
    Blogsites run by those in the ghettoes. World News re: assassination of Boer Leader and harrassment of white farmers in Zimbabwe. Also friends who lived in Zimb and Kenya.
    Liberty for immigrants. Territory for immigrants. Territory for non-Europeans.
    TV is already minority white.
    It's a moot point. Biology doesn't care about colour or civilisation, but Europeans do. Not specifically for racist reasons it's more a question of preference.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  86. L.K says:
    @Rurik

    Enigma??

    C’mon now Rurik; she is no enigma.

    She is a fierce zionist and promoter of the clash of civilizations between the “West’ & Islam, which is purely a zio fabrication on so many different levels & the basis for the synthetic ‘war on terror’, a zio-israeli construct.
    She lies about the History of Palestine with a straight face.

    She seems pro-‘white’ bc the way Jewish activists act is;
    1. they try to shut u up.

    2. if that does not work, they infiltrate & destroy from within.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Karl
  87. rod1963 says:

    The culprit isn’t feminism. It’s not to say it doesn’t play a part, it does. Especially with the younger generations of males who were brought up in a anti-male education system which drugs the snot out of them for the slightest of behavioral infractions.

    Primarily it’s the police state and sue happy culture that has arisen inside of the establishment.

    Say for example you and a couple guys decide to kick Muslim ass and let them know they’re not welcome in your town. They go whining to the cops, ACLU and probably the DOJ. The DOJ labels it a “hate crime” and drops several hundred FBI and DOJ goons into the town to bully the cops and track down the malefactors. Once identified and prosecuted, they’ll be sued in civil court by the ACLU/SPLC.

    Maybe you take a more peaceful approach and just make them feel unwelcome and refuse to do business with them. You still become the target of the DOJ and civil rights extortionists if you are a local politico or business leader.

    The point is the establishment serves as a jackboot on the necks of whites, even if they are just trying to protect their town and women.

    Of course such a authoritarian system breeds a lot of hatred and contempt towards the political, legal classes and police in this country. By letting the pressure build just guarantees when it goes off it will be large and bloody.

  88. Rurik says:
    @L.K

    synthetic ‘war on terror’, a zio-israeli construct.
    She lies about the History of Palestine with a straight face.

    well, I haven’t read her on Palestine, but I always do find it curious when otherwise intelligent people can lament things like the evisceration of the Western male and his proud culture without noticing that every single media outlet and movie and entertainment corporation and advertising are all swarming with Jews- who’re obviously hostile to our culture, our way of life, down to our very DNA.

    pretending to dislike things like Multiculturalism and radical feminism (and even the downfall of white rule in S. Africa!) without seeing the Jewish hand behind these things, certainly must require effort. But then, we’re both writing anonymously, and perhaps being a little too strident can be inconvenient in the real world, especially if you’ve made your career as a writer, no?

    And she does support Trump..

    isn’t that worth something?

    • Replies: @L.K
  89. edNels [AKA "geoshmoe"] says:
    @Biff

    That’s a good point, I think this whole plan is going to fail, Sweden won’t support much more population, and the immigrants will move south again, Dumb Sweeds don’t get it.

  90. So the muscular Muslims will take over emasculated West. How exactly will they do that? With knives, slingshots, guns and dynamite? I doubt that very much. Perhaps they will take over by luring away the fairer sex with their unabashed masculinity and leave emasculated males of the West to their own devices or to each other. Except that most studies point to the fact that the majority of females prefer brainy guys. The Muslims do not stand a chance of taking over the West by violent means except in some fantasy of a sexually confused female. If there is going to be any takeover it will be done without any need for masculinity or violence and only in places where Muslims outnumber the rest of the population. It will be done through a ballot box. A good example is London with its first Muslim mayor. The Muslims took over London without any need for masculinity whatsoever. Even if all the remaining non Muslim males in London had been extremely muscular the result would be the same. Of course none of that would have happened if it had not been enabled by policies of the ruling elites.

    • Replies: @Eric Novak
  91. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @attonn

    “It’s called ‘faux masculinity’, a desperate try of young males to resemble a man, be something that they have little to no understanding or knowledge of.”

    I agree that true manhood should be a unity of mind, body, soul, values, identity, and responsibility. Like John Wayne characters in many Ford Westerns.

    But we are living in a degraded Negrophile culture.

    In this culture, animalism dominates. Muscle power rules.

    In a civilization, a young man may be stronger than an older man, but he would respect the older man as an elder, more experienced. As wiser.

    Among blacks, pure thuggery rules. Since younger males are tougher than older males, young punks rule the streets. And since there are no values that favor elder status over younger status, all that matters is who-can-beat-up-whom. Older black males are afraid to speak truth to younger black males cuz the latter will kick their ass like Muhammad Ali beat up Floyd Patterson and like Mike Tyson beat up Larry Holmes.

    It’s like sports. Younger boxers beat up older boxers. That’s the only measure of manhood in the raw world of animalism. There are NO OTHER considerations. It’s like in the animal world. Younger males defeat older males. That’s that.

    Because blacks are tougher than whites, they define manhood in a society saturated with sports and rap culture. And since young black males beat up older black males, the culture of masculinity is defined by young black punks.
    It’s animalism. (Mercer speaks of Muslims as threat to white manhood. In fact, black males are far more dangerous cuz they got rap and sports and jungalo fever.)

    But we also see a similar amoralism in geekism. Smarts and innovation don’t care about wisdom, experience, and values. It’s all about who can outsmart others with the latest hot gadgetry. So, it doesn’t matter than Mark Zuckerberg is one major a**hole. He outsmarted the rest and made his billions. He can buy all the influence in the world.

    In a world of winner-takes-all based on fist power or brain power, morality and value matter less and less.

    Globalism makes all the Correct Noises about ‘equality-and-diversity’, but the reality is it’s winner-takes-all. Notice how the only GLOB music that matters is Rap. The only GLOB industry that matters is high-tech, what with some geeks raking in billions by coming up with new apps. Or consider the financial wizards in Wall Street who made their money with simple wits and smarts.

    Since power defines morality than vice versa, if the rich and powerful Jews say ‘gay marriage’ is real marriage, it is. That’s how it goes.

  92. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    The Christian tradition with its emphasis on equality, on forgiveness, and on doing good to ones enemies worked well in the West when the governments of “Christian” nations maintained a firmly Old Testament view of foreigners and of the family.

    But the West, today, under the domination of the United States, is committed to globalization, which means destruction of the nation state. What better tool, therefore, to destroy the nations of Christian heritage than the Christian principles of equality and forgiveness applied not only in dealing with uppity women, but also the alien masses intent on settling the European nations, looting their accumulated wealth, and replacing their people with their own?

    As Ms. Turner indicates, women play an important role in the destruction of the West, forming, by virtue of their biologically programming, a major component of a Western liberal fifth column:

    Islamic State projects strength. Strength is an aphrodisiac. Women are biologically programmed to be attracted to powerful men.

    Now, then, is a time not for forgiveness, or for doing good to our enemies but for intolerance. Intolerance of anti-reproductive and anti-masculine feminism, intolerance of multiculturalism, and intolerance of liberals who will tolerate almost anything except intolerance of globalists for the genocide of the Western nations.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  93. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    I meant Ms. Mercer, obviously. Sorry for the error.

  94. utu says:

    This kind of manly behavior by not emasculated men Iliana recommends for Europeans?

    Why did these Israeli soldiers take this young Palestinian girl’s bike?
    http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/08/02/478179/west-bank-girl-bike-israelis-throwaway

  95. Cranky says:

    What a bunch of twaddle.

    The west has been butchering the middle east for two hundred years.

    With minimal effort.

    It is with damn near ridicule I note that Israel dominates the neighbors in military and economic terms despite being outnumbered 100-1.

    The idiots who think Europe will continue to be dominated by Merkel Mommy are sooo wrong.

    As for the islamic state fools, they are simply dead pawns. Now that Erdy has the upper hand, well they are totally superfluous to his dominance of the middle east- and note he made nicey nice with Netanyahoo.

    As for the fluffbucket’s cry that westerners are soft, uh we just killed how many in Iraq?

    A million? A million in Afpak at least- and we are still not done.

    The biggest winners in the middle east are the Iranians and the Turks.

    Saudi wah wah aside, they are sooo ineffective they could not fight their way out of a paper bag- and when Iran comes for them I will applaud- they are dead as soon as Ghawar drops production.

    Europe is slowly beginning to bury the liberal consensus, and we really have buried it outside of our own class problems that are always pandering fodder during every election.

    I really laugh at the thought of the idiot Trump thinking he can bridle our military so casually and get elected.

    Pfft, already we are installing Hillary and the war machine continues to wreak havoc.

    Consider we have wasted a TRILLION DOLLARS on IRAQ AND AFPAK, and still think we can make them into peaceful democratic consumers.

    We incarcerate more men than anyone in the world, and you think we are peaceful?

    What a laugh, outside of suburban burbclaves we are as violent as the middle east.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  96. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/read-bret-easton-ellis-excoriating-monologue-on-social-justice-warriors-and-political-correctness-a7170101.html

    PC-whipping.

    I find Ellis’ bitching somewhat disingenuous because homos and trannies played a HUGE Role in the spread of PC.

    I mean things got so bad that even decent conservative Americans were afraid to oppose ‘gay marriage’ in public.

    Homos are so vain. They play a big role in the creation of PC mania but then bitch about it.

  97. Rurik says:
    @Cranky

    The west has been butchering the middle east for two hundred years.

    It is with damn near ridicule I note that Israel dominates the neighbors in military and economic terms despite being outnumbered 100-1.

    this is not about how well the West’s technology, handed to or stolen by Israel, can splatter villagers. A twenty something girl in Langley is perfectly capable of sitting in an air conditioned room and pressing some buttons and firing a drone-launched Hellfire missile and killing some mujahedeen (and a few old women and children too) That doesn’t make America manly or virile.

    How well do you suppose our feminized, gay-loving, transgendered, high-heel wearing sensitive army would fair hand to hand, ‘mano a mano’ against the highly motivated and willing to die fighters of ISIS?

    we do have our janissaries in the SEALs and special forces, but they’re using their prodigious talents fighting someone else’s enemies. Hardly very virtuous or vigorous, acting as Israel’s dog on a leash.

    that westerners are soft, uh we just killed how many in Iraq?

    A million? A million in Afpak at least- and we are still not done.

    see above

    Europe is slowly beginning to bury the liberal consensus,

    not from where I’m siting. It’s just more of the same liberal, suicidal, castrated march over the cliff.

    Trump thinking he can bridle our military so casually and get elected.

    Trump is hugely popular with the military. The only one who doesn’t like him is the traitorous, sniveling coward McCain. And m0cking that particular POS will only win Trump thunderous cheers, from the military, and every other red-blooded, patriotic American.

    We incarcerate more men than anyone in the world, and you think we are peaceful?

    not peaceful, but cowardly and stupid. Slaughtering and maiming and displacing millions upon millions of people in the service of our worst enemy. That’s hardly anything to beat your chest over. The emasculated part comes when we send our young men to die in wars for Israel and then our Zio-fecal government invites the survivors of our wars to come to Idaho and the Dakotas to comfort the war widows.

    invade and invite

    the actions of a castrated society hell-bent on filling the wombs of its women with the seeds of its enemies.

    You should be Cranky, but rather it sounds like you consider this all quite invigorating.

    • Replies: @Regnum Nostrum
  98. Rehmat says:
    @Jim Christian

    Was not having sex with animals practiced by Jewish barbarians in the past?

    Oops! In fact the Israeli rabbis and Jews still use White and African women as sex slaves while call them animals.

    http://peacepalestine.blogspot.ca/2005/10/paradise-mombassa-translated-and.html

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/04/29/sterling-israel-treats-blacks-like-dogs/

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  99. @Rurik

    How well do you suppose our feminized, gay-loving, transgendered, high-heel wearing sensitive army would fair hand to hand, ‘mano a mano’ against the highly motivated and willing to die fighters of ISIS?

    Irrelevant question. We do not fight with swords anymore. No amount of masculinity will help you to fight a missile.

    • Replies: @Avery
    , @Talha
    , @SteveRogers42
  100. Jason Liu says:
    @unpc downunder

    To be fair, Japanese society is still fairly patriarchal and women are clearly not equals. If they were, maybe they’d would cause a social decline similar to that in the west.

    • Replies: @WhatEvvs
  101. There have been matriarchal societies in the past, but they were all conquered by patriarchal societies. Something for the man haters to consider. If they gain full control, we will all be conquered and have to live under Sharia. Pick your poison, ladies.

  102. @Rehmat

    Well, coming from the camel-driving and boy-loving Islamic faith of evil, Reeeeee!Mat, you seem to have all the answers. Meanwhile, nothing I wrote had anything to do with you, but maybe heterosexual discussion just inspires you to your perversions and fantasies of goats and young boys, tied to your whipping post..

  103. Avery says:
    @Regnum Nostrum

    {Irrelevant question. We do not fight with swords anymore. No amount of masculinity will help you to fight a missile}

    Well, not so irrelevant.

    No number of missiles or bombs has conquered a country.
    (except a nuke bomb: but then there is nothing left to conquer.)
    You have to take and hold ground to conquer a country.
    And that means the proverbial “boots on the ground”.

    If missiles won wars, US would not have lost in Afghanistan (USSR also).
    US would not have lost in Viet Nam.
    Men don’t fight hand-to-hand with swords: its AK-47 vs AK-47 or M-16.
    But still takes a lot of guts, stamina, skill,…..

    Having said that, I do not share the opinion that “our feminized, gay-loving, transgendered, high-heel wearing sensitive army”.
    Individual American warriors fought very well in Afghanistan.
    There are countless examples. I don’t think the warrior core has been affected by the social engineering. But maybe members of military have a better idea.

    One thing that was very disturbing was seeing some marines crying when Iranians took them in. I always thought marines were made of better material. But maybe the standards have been watered down.

    • Replies: @SteveRogers42
  104. @Threecranes

    How ridiculous. Anders Brievek is that you?

  105. WhatEvvs [AKA "Mipchunk"] says:
    @Anonymous

    It’s Miss Mercer.

    MEMRI has an excellent reputation. Please give an example of where they have mistranslated anything. Wild charges are meaningless.

    • Replies: @dahoit
  106. Corvinus says:
    @helena

    You listed a website. You listed an article. Yet, I specifically asked for a reference to this exact statement.

    “We’re talking hundreds of years but crucially, once the % white gets down to a certain level, the south africa situation develops and the onus becomes on white people to blend in or suffer the fate of a very very unpopular ghetto.”

    Put another way–what scientists are discussing from a biological perspective this “south africa situation”? Who coined this term? Because you are making it appear that it is some sort of phenomenon talked about by scientists.

    • Replies: @helena
  107. WhatEvvs [AKA "Mipchunk"] says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    ” I guess that I’m just weary of commentators (e.g., Charles Murray) telling men to “man up,”

    OK. And I’m weary of commentators who blame everything on the secondary effect known as feminism. Hugh Hefner & the Beats preceded the feminists by 10-15 years. They hated the nuclear family, marriage, heterosexuality, the works. They were the ones who drained the prestige from family formation. The feminists were the coup de grace.

  108. Corvinus says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “The Christian tradition with its emphasis on equality, on forgiveness, and on doing good to ones enemies worked well in the West when the governments of “Christian” nations maintained a firmly Old Testament view of foreigners and of the family.”

    [Laughs] that’s not the way it works, or had worked. Indeed, America was founded by Christians and espoused Christian principles. YET, the Founding Fathers made it clear that a secular government would be created by its citizens, present and future, with those individuals determining who will be welcomed as newcomers.

    “But the West, today, under the domination of the United States, is committed to globalization, which means destruction of the nation state.”

    That is observably false. America is a nation consisting of dozens of groups of people who created a dominant culture, as well as ensuring individual cultures would be safeguarded. It is a state created by those same groups, with definitive borders–unfortunately, those borders need to be tightened up.

    “What better tool, therefore, to destroy the nations of Christian heritage than the Christian principles of equality and forgiveness applied not only in dealing with uppity women, but also the alien masses intent on settling the European nations, looting their accumulated wealth, and replacing their people with their own?”

    Think about it for a moment. The English were the ORIGINAL settlers of America. They felt the same way about “foreigners”, i.e. their competitors, yet in the end allowed these different ethnic groups to come here, and they prospered. Fast forward to the 1840’s and 1850’s. Nativists felt the same way about the Irish and Germans, their fellow “whites”, yet held disdain for their alien cultures. However, in the end, they were allowed to come here, and they prospered. Rinse and repeat. In EACH case, the natives were “replaced”.

    More importantly, remembered WHO accumulated wealth and replaced people here in North and South America without their consent…

    “As Ms. Turner indicates, women play an important role in the destruction of the West, forming, by virtue of their biologically programming, a major component of a Western liberal fifth column”.

    Americans generally today have little regard for the West. They refer to their homeland as “The United States”. Why are so many people here so consumed with this notion of “the West” or “western civilization”.

  109. Anon7 says:

    BTW

    Why, a decadent dilatant named Ralf Jaeger…

    You mean “dilettante”. The word you used didn’t set off your spell checker because “dilatant” is a real word, an engineering term referring to a shear-thickening material (corn starch in water is an example) that is soft if you push on it gently, but hard if you punch it.

  110. WhatEvvs [AKA "Mipchunk"] says:
    @Jason Liu

    Admittedly, I know little of Japan first hand. I know only what I read. But I read that Japan has a below replacement level birth rate. Fingleton says that that is by choice. But still, it’s aging.

  111. WhatEvvs [AKA "Mipchunk"] says:

    Things are terrible in the West, I agree.

    But I don’t think Islam will take over anything. Islam is devoid of ideas, positive forward momentum.

    Let’s not exaggerate.

    Christianity does seem to have hit a snag. Too many Christians are too intelligent to believe in the ridiculous foundation myths of the religion. This is a problem.

  112. @Jacques Sheete

    “…FYI it’s a class war, Honey, and always has been”

    “The issue which has swept down through the ages, and will have to be fought, is the people against the banks.” – Acton.

    The Federal Reserve

    The CFR

    AIPAC

    • Agree: Jacques Sheete
  113. @attonn

    White birth rate in the US is right at replacement level. White population in the US is stable. Immigration is the problem.

  114. @Regnum Nostrum

    Studies about what women like claim they like brainy men? Did you read that in a Cosmo article at checkout? That they like nerds is contrary to common sense and the experiences of all men.

    • Replies: @grapesoda
    , @Regnum Nostrum
  115. Talha says:
    @Rurik

    Dear Rurik,

    I can see why you get that impression from the video since it is but a short clip and the audience is definitely a Muslim one in order to shore up their confidence in their tradition. However, Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad (db – aka Tim Winter) knows about the subtleties and his other talks and writings bespeak of a profound knowledge of European history (and the laudable parts of it) and its trajectory (with a special understanding of the Anglo-Saxon subset of it). He was talking more of the pop-mono-culture that seems to indeed be an enemy of East and West – which is why he contrasted the traditional spirit imbued in Lucas’ original version (where Luke [in the European tradition] may well be seen as the ‘squire’ to Obi Wan’s ‘wandering knight’) compared to the the current Hollywood nonsense. I guess it is the perennial question; does art imitate life or vice versa?

    Millions upon millions of Western women are barren and alone or living with cats, having been seduced by the false gods of feminism.

    I know some at work – very sad…and they are too old now to do anything about it.

    Radical feminism and radical homosexuality

    And I believe his point about imperialism was that the new-age feminism is used as a tool to whip up support in a section of the population (leftists/liberals) which would naturally not be allies of war – but, who can argue with “Hey, it’s for women’s rights – what are you some kind of women-hater?”

    they were doing so on behalf of imperialist Islamic terrorists and drug traffickers. I know that must sound like an oxy-moron to you, but it’s well documented

    I partially agree with this. I met some of the KLA – not much ‘Islamic’ about them – they seemed like secular ethno-nationalists to me, totally full of themselves and repulsive – “We’re descendants from the Illyrians!” I can totally believe they are involved in criminal enterprises and did horrible things to ethnic Serbs. But I also met with common Kosovars that were devastated by what the Serbian military did – though that does not validate NATO’s bombardment of civilians in Serbian proper.

    We share a common enemy

    I can agree to this is a general sense; post-modern, vacuous, consumer culture that has no room for the words like ‘virtue’, ‘modesty’, ‘honor’…and of course it wants you to offer up your sons to Moloch to establish this new world order.

    May God grant you a spouse and children who are the coolness of your eyes.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  116. Talha says:
    @Regnum Nostrum

    And this is a good thing too, because any hand-to-hand against a Chechen probably means him beating you to death with your own hand.

    “The ones that were left — I read this in a Chechen guy’s account of growing up on in the steppes — the kids that survived used to pass the time by fighting. That’s all they did. All day, every day. One kid would go to another kid’s tent and call his name. The kid would come out swinging and they’d fight till it was time to go in and have their gruel or whatever. Broken bones, damaged organs — all part of the fun. You weren’t even supposed to mention them or you weren’t a real man.”
    http://exiledonline.com/war-nerd-whats-a-chechen/

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Regnum Nostrum
  117. Brohemius says:
    @Lawrence Fitton

    Thanks for weighing in from 1967. I didn’t know time-travel was actually possible. “a closed mind is like a stylus stuck in a vinyl groove…” That sealed the deal. You must have written the scripts for “Then Came Bronson”. And your refusal to capitalize words just proves what an egalitarian you are! Even men and women are essentially the same!

  118. @Lawrence Fitton

    I mean — have you ever looked at your hand? I mean really looked at it? You can hear the colors, man!

  119. @Avery

    Those were sailors, not Marines.

  120. @Regnum Nostrum

    Don’t believe the hype.

    Close-quarter combat is exceptionally relevant in the era of 4GW. In active-shooter terrorist attacks (Bataclan, Pulse nightclub, etc.) the action can be very up-close and personal, and strength, skill, and fighting spirit are the decisive factors. Remember the Americans who stopped the terrorist on the French train? Or the takedown of the shoe bomber?

    In recognized battle zones, CQB is equally important, as this article demonstrates:

    http://www.gq.com/story/battle-of-bastion-taliban-afghanistan-air-base

    Fifteen attackers who were neither deterred nor defeated by “missiles”, but by a high “amount of masculinity” on the ground.

  121. @attonn

    In pre-industrial warfare, an overwhelming numerical advantage was usually (but not always) the decisive factor. Nowadays, not so much. If we open the hatches on a single Trident submarine, we could depopulate the entire Middle East without losing a man.

  122. Excellent article.

    One of the many odd things about the Muslim immivasion is the demographics of the human wave. It seems to be overwhelmingly military-age males — few women and children , no oldsters. And they are welcomed by the govts. of France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, etc. Aside from the obvious 4GW military potential of this cohort, what would the reaction of the European states have been if the “migrants” were mostly 18-30-year-old females? Would the feminized “leadership” of Europe have been quite so ready to welcome them into the fold? Or would they have found some rationalization to exclude competitors in the sexual marketplace? Are the you-go-grrrllzzz of Europe bored with home-grown beta males and looking to find some replacements? There’s something very odd about the whole thing that underlies the surface issues.

  123. helena says:
    @Corvinus

    I think you have a comprehension problem

    • Replies: @helena
  124. helena says:
    @helena

    I think what you are doing is conflating ‘science’ – statements that can be made about what is now and what is projected, with ‘social’ – policies that steer events in one direction or another and often of course with unforeseen consequences. Think of it like a scenario model. Science sits in the middle with the upper and lower limits malleable to social policy. If governments chose to, they could introduce programmes to increase European family formation, but they don’t. What governments are doing at the moment is a) providing means for African countries to decrease mortality rates and, b) presenting images of white minorities as the normal social situation in the West. Take for instance a European woman who works in international development, visiting Africa frequently to work with African communities. But back at home she opts for a reduced family size and her mothering includes long and/or frequent absences. In her mind she is ‘saving the world’; in reality she is helping promote African survival at the expense of European survival. But like I said, who survives is of no concern to either evolution as a process or progressivism as an ideology. Of course I could flesh this out with links but Google is so easy to use I think if you’re interested you can find the information.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Talha
  125. Karl says:
    @Threecranes

    > My home doesn’t have a basement

    My window faces the South

  126. Karl says:
    @L.K

    > 2. if that does not work, they infiltrate & destroy from within

    Strong creatures don’t succumb to parasites.

    Parasites weed out the weak.

    Nature isn’t pretty. Just ask the Neanderthals.

  127. grapesoda says:
    @Eric Novak

    I do think that women like brains, in the form of sophistication. They do not like awkwardness, boringness, overanalysis, or other extremely left-brained socially tone deaf tendencies.

    This applies mainly to either women of higher social class, or those who aspire to be. Ghetto and guidette types may not be impressed with sophistication. But it’s very “in” now to be nerdy and culturally sophisticated.

    Corvinus –

    Heartiste is a hack. His reputation is made from his little follower bitch boys who lack the intellectual confidence to form their own opinions based on their experiences. Aren’t you a little too old for that shit? Isn’t it a little, *ahem*, BETA for the little boys to follow Roissy and Roosh and salivate over their every word? Funny how no one ever points out this blatantly obvious contradiction.

    Real men strike out into the world and forge their own path. They don’t need some white collar faggot sitting behind a desk and immersed in a catty artificial social environment to tell them what’s what.

  128. grapesoda says:
    @Jim Christian

    Roosh is at least 15 years younger than you. He was still in knickers when you were knocking about in DC. You really shouldn’t be commenting on these matters at all, because you are referring to a completely different social environment which no longer exists.

    http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/old-economy-steven

  129. Corvinus says:
    @helena

    “I think what you are doing is conflating ‘science’ – statements that can be made about what is now and what is projected, with ‘social’ – policies that steer events in one direction or another and often of course with unforeseen consequences.”

    Talk about comprehension problems. There is a reason for social science–it employs the scientific method. A person refers past and current factors and crafts policies which takes into account positive and negative outcomes. The result of this process is the best solution from several solutions that maximizes benefits and minimizes problems.

    “Think of it like a scenario model. Science sits in the middle with the upper and lower limits malleable to social policy.”

    Please elaborate here, this statement makes no sense without background or context.

    “If governments chose to, they could introduce programmes to increase European family formation, but they don’t.”

    Actually, Russia is employing this social policy based on science.

    http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2012/12/19/vladimir-putin-offers-to-pay-russian-women-to-have-three-babies/

    “What governments are doing at the moment is a) providing means for African countries to decrease mortality rates and, b) presenting images of white minorities as the normal social situation in the West.”

    In other words, white propaganda.

    “Take for instance a European woman who works in international development, visiting Africa frequently to work with African communities. But back at home she opts for a reduced family size and her mothering includes long and/or frequent absences. In her mind she is ‘saving the world’; in reality she is helping promote African survival at the expense of European survival. ”

    You assume that her mentality is “saving the world”, and then try to explain her thought process as being ultimately detrimental to whites. You do not know her motivations. It might well just as be that she, as a Christian, seeks to assist those who are in need. It might well just as be that she is unable to bear children because of a condition. It might well just as be that she is waiting later in life to have offspring.

    Regardless, it is the personal choice of men and women to have children.

    But like I said, who survives is of no concern to either evolution as a process or progressivism as “an ideology.”

    Actually it is a major concern to those who embrace eugenics and white nationalism as ideologies.

    • Replies: @helena
  130. Che Guava says:
    @Rurik

    Rurik,

    Thanks for the reply. I have not read what you have. Will do.

    You are correct that most Jewish writers always seem to leave holes for their groups in their narratives, Chomsky and Finkelstein (worse than Chomsky, because Chomsky’s bs quotient was obvious many years ago) as examples who made themselves look particularly foolish.

    This site is hosted by Ron Unz, other commentors say he is Jewish, I neither know nor care, but does he not allow very free expression?

    I like to think that Ilana writes in good faith. She doesn’t seem very fond of the neoconlib axis. Counts for something to me. I know she is an Anna Rosenbaum fan, but that can’t be helped.

    Israel Shamir, not technically jewish by one definition, but still is by another, is always interesting, and never afraid of criticizing Israeli policies, even if I think his original writing on the attempted coup in Turkey was wrong

    Former terrorist in Palestine (and grand old man of them), Uri Avnery, makes sense most of the time, again does not hesitate to criticise the state’s polity.

    Marx and Engels, it is so interesting that Marx never mentions the jewish role in the rise of capitalism in Das Kapital, but runs off on all sorts of tangents. The book by Engels on the family and state (I forget the title in English) makes his prejudice against non-jews clear. Also sure that he never treated his factory workers well. Between those two things, it convinced me that it was a lie in total, but still worth having read in detail, has some food for thought.

    Cheers Rurik.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  131. […] Emasculated West Primed for A Muscular, Muslim Takeover […]

  132. Talha says:
    @helena

    Hey helena,

    I’ve read your comments and you seem to have a very balanced view of things; practical as well as a long-term view. You have analyzed the problem and are not being fooled by the multi-cultural narrative. So…

    In your circle of women (still of child-bearing age), how many are like minded? How many of those have then found like minded males who are responsible partners (as certain people of the ‘White/European Resurgence’ mindset are quite repulsive) enough to at least start a modest 2 child home? My wife – a convert from Scandinavian stock – gave birth to four kids (the third, a 10+ pounder that almost broke her) and gave up many of her personal aspirations to raise them. ‘Mother’ is both a technical term and a spiritual one. Because without these ideas being put into motion – the reality on the ground will be that nothing but hand-wringing and mutual back-patting on internet forums will be accomplished. For instance, I see women like Anne Coulter and Ms. Mercer talking about these things a great deal, but have produced a single child between the both of them. That is their choice of course, but how can one rail on and on about society going to hell in a hand basket without taking practical (non-controversial) steps to stem the tide?

    May God grant you a spouse and children which are the coolness of your eyes.

    • Replies: @helena
  133. dahoit says:
    @Rehmat

    The zionists would never permit Muslims taking what is theirs.
    Look at Israel.
    Trump for POTUS.

  134. helena says:
    @Corvinus

    Your replies don’t correspond to what I write.

    The European ethnic group is being deliberately replaced. Why or by whom I do not know. Let’s just leave it that. If you don’t believe it that’s fine.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  135. dahoit says:
    @WhatEvvs

    Memri has an excellent reputation with serial liars yes.
    How anyone can possibly believe that it is Islam that is the threat to America when Zionism has US committing suicide is a figment of 9-11 imagination.
    And pray tell US,who benefited from 9-11 but Israel?
    Is this misdirection or the sign of true believers in horsecrap?

  136. dahoit says:
    @Rurik

    The last we heard of the truthful Mel was he and fellow truthful Charlie Sheen were put in a rowboat,called the Bobby Fisher,and set loose in the current of Fukushima.

  137. @grapesoda

    He grew up there (just outside, S.S. Md) and was indeed kicking around in the late 90’s and 2000s. His stuff was well out and about all over the place on blogs and bulletin boards when I left DC for Boston in 2009. You have NO idea what you’re talking about. Again, look at him, of course he has woman problems. And he’s been bitching about it for well over a decade and a half. And who cares? Guys like him probably drove the women to obesity and piercings and the M&Ms of the depressed and addled. Contradict him or that fat Forney (Mr. Rape allegations, Anne Sturzburg or some such, and of course, Rachel Haywire and her deal with him) and you are instantly banned. They write whole blog posts and comments to the contrary are banned as are the posters. They are what they are. But spare me your sympathies for them. Rabble-rouser who think they’re helping anyone but themselves.

  138. @Eric Novak

    Firstly, I was not talking about nerds. Secondly, here is just a couple of quotes from scientific publications.

    The Journal of Evolution and Human Behavior recently published a new study from four researchers in the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Davis. The study finds that women, both in short- and long-term relationship situations find the brainy guy more attractive than the dumb jock.

    German geneticists say by favouring intelligence over strength and looks, our female ancestors set in motion a process that, over thousands of years, has developed the modern human brain.

    The second one proves the point. If females went for the dumb muscle man the world today would have been populated by morons with physique of a bodybuilder.

  139. @grapesoda

    Not the greatest idea to advise young men, Grape, the few that read him, that “no isn’t necessarily no”. Feminism is insane with all the rape-culture crap and Roosh and Forney are espousing “No ain’t no” like that. Great idea if you like your sex in the jail of a judge’s choosing. Instead, they should be pushing pre-nups and pre-sex contracts.

  140. helena says:
    @Talha

    Talha, I have skim read a lot of your comments but I have to say I find your closing blessings very annoying! There’s a time and place for everything and piety belongs in a dedicated place of worship.

    God already blessed me with two sons, 29 and 25. I don’t know if they’re the coolness of my eyes whatever that means but we had a great day out in Amsterdam earlier in the year. Luckily they tolerate my satyrical sense of humour.

    “In your circle of women (still of child-bearing age), how many are like minded? ”

    I have relatives of child-bearing age but not friends. My social sphere is liberal progressive. I study biology of culture. I’d go as far as saying that ‘life’ at population level is a competition between different paternal lines – apparently there are 20 but 7 dominate the world. One in three men is Han Chinese. Ha!

    Most of my friends and relatives have stable, assortatively mated families of 3+ children. The hippies had 4+, the marxists were chaotic and had 0 or 1.

    [good choice in the bride department, btw ;)]

    • Replies: @Talha
  141. @Talha

    Nice fairy tale but a bit short. Do you have another one?

    • Replies: @Talha
  142. @Rehmat

    “three-out-of-four converts to Islam are women”

    Makes perfect sense, given that women go for dominant men, and a Muslim husband has “situational alpha” in the same way a Christian husband did “in elder days before the fall”.

    Muslims seem to be culturally innoculated against many of the changes which have debilitated Western societies – but then if those societies hadn’t been so debilitated, Muslims wouldn’t be living in them.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  143. Talha says:
    @Regnum Nostrum

    About Chechens? Sure!

    “In “The Gulag Archipelago,” Alexander Solzhenitsyn notes that in the camps everyone was afraid of the guards, but the guards were only afraid of the Chechens.”
    https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/the-lessons-of-boston-23671

    Your turn. I suggest asking any surviving Spetsnaz veterans about the assault on Grozny.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Regnum Nostrum
    , @Avery
  144. Corvinus says:
    @helena

    “Your replies don’t correspond to what I write.”

    Enlighten me.

    “The European ethnic group is being deliberately replaced. Why or by whom I do not know. Let’s just leave it that. If you don’t believe it that’s fine.”

    If you don’t know why or by whom, then how are you able to contend it is deliberate? Listen, people in Europe, just like people in the States, will ultimately decide how many children to have, with whom they want to mate with. Those who support immigration now, and those who advocated for it in the past, were not trying to get rid of their own kind of people. That is just plain silly.

    • Replies: @helena
  145. @Talha

    I suggest asking any surviving Spetsnaz veterans about the assault on Grozny.

    It is interesting that somebody who has become famous on this forum for his cloying politeness and the portrayal of Muslims as a bunch of kind hearted scholars is suddenly promoting violent Chechens.

    • Replies: @Talha
  146. Talha says:
    @Regnum Nostrum

    Hey RN,

    You have NOT been paying attention to my posts. I have never promoted a ‘fruity’ version of Islam.

    The issue at hand was about the fighting spirit of the backbone of Daesh who are primarily Chechen and Uzbek – not about their tactics or ideology. One can both denounce the Mongol hordes and the Nazis while recognizing their military prowess brilliance at tactical maneuvering. Just recently I stated on another post:
    “So sad that many Chechens have become extremists – they are such solid fighters.”
    http://www.unz.com/tsaker/major-syria-developments-soon/#comment-1490339

    Even UR’s very own Fred Reed could give accolades to the fighting spirit of the Taliban while thoroughly denouncing their philosophy:
    “I cannot endorse the politics of the Taliban. If one of them told me that my daughter couldn’t go to school, one of us would leave the room on a stretcher. Yet as fighting men, are they not magnificent? They have only rifles, explosives, RPGs, and balls. Their enemies have unlimited air support, helicopters, armor, artillery, sophisticated communications, night-vision gear, good food and excellent medical care. The Taliban take heavy casualties, their enemies almost none. The ragheads do not even have PX privileges. Yet they have not been defeated. A fight on even terms would last perhaps five minutes.”
    http://www.fredoneverything.net/Baez.shtml

    And as far as invading Russians into Chechnya, Muslims sending them back in body bags is a time-honored tradition, one for which we owe no apology:
    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Shamil

    If one cannot see the difference between noble use of arms as in this case (http://www.abdelkaderproject.org/about-emir-abdelkader/) versus the nonsense that Daesh practices – that is their problem, not ours.

    The warrior saint is solid part of our tradition (the fourth caliph, Ali ibn Abi Talib [ra], was known for his asceticism, piety, generosity, nightly prayer vigils, aphorisms, being the link between the Prophet [pbuh] and all the Sufi orders [save one]…and the ability to nearly cleave a man in half on the battlefield) – the suicide bomber of cafes and killers of children are not.

    Peace.

  147. Talha says:
    @helena

    Hey helena,

    Annoying eh? No soup for you!

    I kid, I’ll stick to the ‘Peace’ sign off for you.

    Well, I can’t say you and yours haven’t done their part for queen and country – I am always more impressed by people who walk the walk. The expression of ‘coolness’ is a prayer in hopes that whenever your eyes fall on your sons, you feel happy and elated; I hope they are doing their part to keep you happy and earn your prayers.

    Thanks, she is a catch – mashaAllah. But the funny thing is, she inquired about me. Glad she did too, I was way too insecure to approach someone like her since I thought she was way out of my league.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @helena
  148. Ed says:

    The problem is that women are the ones that have allowed the culture to be emasculated to their own detriment. Looks like they are going to go in for the kill this fall.

  149. Avery says:
    @Talha

    {. I suggest asking any surviving Spetsnaz veterans about the assault on Grozny.}

    Hey Talha: Where is your evidence that Russian troops who assaulted Grozny during First Chechen war were Spetsnaz?. My information is that during the first war, drunkard Yeltsin and incompetent Russian military leadership sent raw recruits 18-20 from Russian heartland (flatlands) into a meatgrinder manned by tough, experienced Chechen mountain fighters 25-30.

    During the second Chechen war Russian leadership had learned their lesson and sent volunteer, experienced contraktnikee and other experienced troops. They did much better. Also, Putin was able to turn a segment of Chechens, who cut the Chechen Islamist terrorists to pieces.

    On another note, the military prowess of Chechens has very little to do with Islam. Their fighting prowess is largely due to their ethnicity: indigenous, Caucasus mountain people who predate Islam by 1,000 of years. They would be just as fierce warriors being Christian. I know that for certain.

    • Replies: @Talha
  150. helena says:
    @Corvinus

    how are you able to contend it is deliberate?

    because demos, polit groups, legislation, stigmatisation, all point to a social engineering policy that has been imposed on Europeans against their wishes. what Europeans would have preferred in the 70s would have been family planning policies to avert the reduced birthrate that triggered immigration

    people in Europe, just like people in the States, will ultimately decide how many children to have, with whom they want to mate with.

    of course but people are influenced by policy and imagery

    Those who support immigration now, and those who advocated for it in the past, were not trying to get rid of their own kind of people.

    some were/are, some weren’t/aren’t. but either way they have done

  151. @Anonymous Nephew

    Correct. I don’t see Muslim men giving up THEIR privilege and wealth to Feminism, Inc. Muslims from the Arab countries that come here have no tolerance for the Blacks and women and I suspect will vie for supremacy with Hispanics. They’ll keep a few Whites and Asians around to keep the lights on, so to speak, but that Muslim/Hispanic competition will heat up some day. I’ll take the Hispanics, giving three.

    • Replies: @Talha
  152. @helena

    Interesting still, Helena, that Western society was pushed and pushed to stop breeding and we conveniently forgot to tell the REAL breeders to comply. Kind of like the way the West is supposed to go solar, we hamstring our energy industries yet Asia, the Middle East and South America are still full-on fossil fuels including the dirtiest, most sulfur-laden coal burned until their populations can’t breathe. To top it all of, they’re deforesting their land for, you guessed it, charcoal.

    Only the U.S. and Europe even care to count carbon credits and for all that, it’s pointless. The rest of the world gives a crap, they’re still cooking outside and it ain’t on a Weber Kettle loaded with rib-eyes and Kingsford, hickory chips and a cocktail (or three). A lot of anti-Western policy is taking place at the hand of Western policy-makers.

    Why are they doing it to us? Ha! I kid because I care. Good takes, Helena. I think of you as GoodLiberal.

    As with the others, peace.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  153. Talha says:
    @Avery

    Hey Avery,

    You are certainly right about the majority of the soldiers tossed at Grozny, but Spetsnaz were certainly used (that’s why I said ask them, since green conscripts would be impressed by anything):
    “Into this chaos the Spetsnaz forces were frequently sent on special operations.”
    Death Before Dishonour: True Stories of the Special Forces

    I thought OMON troops were inclusive of their own Spetsnaz (can’t tell whether this is Grozny 1 or 2):
    http://www.military.com/video/operations-and-strategy/terrorism/grozny-mop-up-and-ambush-graphic/763655300001

    The Russians did indeed learn from the first debacle.

    the military prowess of Chechens has very little to do with Islam

    Likely. Same with Punjabis, they’d likely be solid scrappers without Islam. People of that region have been solid warriors, for instance the Circassians and other Caucasians that, along with hardy Turkic steppe soldiers, made up the backbone of the Mamluks – (the slaves-become-kings) who first ones to defeat the Mongols in a pitched battle at Ain Jalut and took control over much of the Muslim world. But two things; 1) being Muslim may have helped them retain that edge (for instance, the Scandinavians used to produce the fearsome Varangian Guard who were Byzantium’s elite imperial caretakers) 2) I don’t know much of their exploits before they actually became Muslim – from what I’ve read, they were constantly beating each other up (clan blood feuds) to do anything effective; the Sufi orders were essential in breaking down these barriers and forging them into an effective united people – bloody policies by Russian Tsars did the rest.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @Avery
  154. Talha says:
    @Jim Christian

    Hey JC,

    Your assumption is that Muslim/Hispanic is mutually exclusive:
    http://www.latinpost.com/articles/105363/20151230/number-latinos-converting-islam-growing.htm

    My father’s mosque in SoCal is about to hire a Latino convert for Imam (religious director) role – one of the motivations being the support for growing Latino population in congregation.

    Peace.

  155. Talha says:
    @Talha

    Looks like the video is indeed from Grozny 1 – missed the time stamp (7.3.1996) on it the first time. The soldiers in it look confident and definitely in the late 20’s to 30’s range. You may be able to tell what the dialog says.

  156. Rurik says:
    @Talha

    Dear Talha,

    the perennial question; does art imitate life or vice versa?

    well Talha, when the “art” is emanating out of Hollywood, we can both be certain that it has an agenda. They don’t make so much as a commercial that doesn’t have some agenda-driven message tucked in there. And because Hollywood is owned and controlled by Jews and homosexuals, (often Jewish homosexuals), their agenda is to remake our culture into something that suits their proclivities better than traditional Western culture, with its ancient virtues and notions of honor and chivalry. There’s nothing about Brokeback Mountain that imitates real life

    I can see how many people in Islam (and all other cultures not under the thrall of the fiend) would look at the West and wonder with deep consternation at how a once proud and noble people came to this.

    but it’s been engineered, and imposed on us. Just like the way Berlin was a giant brothel with homosexuality and rampant pedophilia during Weimar. And all the same players are involved, just a few generations removed.

    – but, who can argue with “Hey, it’s for women’s rights – what are you some kind of women-hater?”

    well in this, and many other ways, Islam does seem to me to be superior to what Western culture has evolved into (albeit with lots of deliberate assistance). Even the author of this article is lamenting the sissification of the Western male. They may say they want to be empowered, and who can blame them, but they’ve been lied to – that their enemies are their men (their fathers and brothers and sons and neighbors). Their enemies are the 1%, just like my enemies are the 1%.
    But at least in Islam (the moderate kind) you have maintained a respect for gender roles that both men and women thrive under. And you treat pedophiles the way they should be treated.

    did horrible things to ethnic Serbs. But I also met with common Kosovars that were devastated by what the Serbian military did –

    the lesson for the Serbs is that demographics = destiny. That’s a lesson the West had better learn, and quick, or there’s going to be a whole lot more Kosovos all over the globe.

    We share a common enemy

    I can agree to this is a general sense; post-modern, vacuous, consumer culture that has no room for the words like ‘virtue’, ‘modesty’, ‘honor’…and of course it wants you to offer up your sons to Moloch to establish this new world order.

    both Western children and the children of Islam are intended to fight each other and kill each other for the benefit of the international globalists who’re wringing their hands with demonic glee at the slaughter.

    We should be smarter than to play their sick game of ‘let’s you and him fight’

    peace Talha

    keep on keepin’ on

    • Replies: @Talha
  157. Talha says:
    @Rurik

    Oh my good Lord – that photo of those men(?)! I think I need to take a shower – my eyes!

    Yeah – I’m vigilant about what I let my kids watch.

    their fathers

    This is crucial, I think your hope lies in the next generation – raise your daughters well and not in the mold they want them (so that they are used in their youth and discarded as barren shells in their old age). I recently had a talk with my daughter about the fact that, as her wali, I have veto power over her choice in a husband and that it is a decision to be made by mutual consultation between the two of us. It started a little hostile, but she understood the wisdom in it by the end (though I’m sure we’ll have to have a refresher talk in a few years 😉 ) – humor goes a long way in these kinds of conversations with them. Don’t let your daughters out of your hands until they are ready…this takes investment of time.

    And it’s funny what you bring up; I see a lot of people knocking Muslims for the obscure practice of ‘bacha bazi’ that is particular to Afghanistan. Of course, our government put the ‘boy players’ in charge (according to our own military):
    “The Taliban made the practice punishable by death, but bacha bazi has been resurrected since the fall of the Taliban.”
    https://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/2015-10-30qr.pdf

    Peace and same to you friend.

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @Rurik
  158. Talha says:
    @Talha

    Don’t let your daughters out of your hands until they are ready

    And by this, I meant as person may hold a bird in their palms before letting it fly away when it’s ready or as a parent holds a child’s hand while the cross the road before they get safely to the other side…thought I should clarify that before I get walloped for calling for caging daughters in basements or something.

  159. Che Guava says:
    @Che Guava

    So I did some background reading, parts are a little curious, like the Sth.African part being only infancy, and her father having been possibly a pal of Joe Slovo in the heavily Jewish-dominated (at the top, an oddity at the time for Communist Parties) Sth. African CP.

    I would love to hear her opinion of her father’s political activites, and why the family chose to leave for Israel.

    At the time, Zionism was playing a strange double game, controlling the ANC through the CP, whist Israeli govt. was passing their, mainly stolen, atomic-bomb tech. to the old apartheid govt.

    Very few seem to recall that it was a nuclear weapons holder on a similar scale to Nth. Korea of now, largely thanks to assistance from Israel.

    I still like Ilana’s writing, agree far more than I disagree, am not a fan of Anna Rosenbaum, but Anna does get some people right (some of the secondary characters .a few bit characters are very true to life).

    The cover of Into the Cannibal’s Pot is nystifying to you?

    That mystification is mystifying to me.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  160. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @helena

    Yeah, shove it down his craw, Helena.

    But don’t waste too much time on Corvinus, who’s just a globalist troll, with no more reasoning power than a bird. Corvinus will say anything and then attack you for not responding to his idiotic remarks.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  161. Rurik says:
    @Talha

    Dear Talha,

    That’s a pretty amazing link. I’ll have to peruse it later.

    And it’s funny what you bring up; I see a lot of people knocking Muslims for the obscure practice of ‘bacha bazi’ that is particular to Afghanistan. Of course, our government put the ‘boy players’ in charge (according to our own military):
    “The Taliban made the practice punishable by death, but bacha bazi has been resurrected since the fall of the Taliban.”

    sounds like the heroin trade that was the first thing the CIA reconstituted in Afghanistan once the Taliban was out of the way.

    I remember being effected by that story of the soldier who was chastised for assaulting that Afghanistan officer who kept a little boy chained to his bed as a sex slave. I rather think I’d have shot the monster, no matter what uniform he was wearing- US or anything else. (I suppose I wouldn’t make a very good soldier in ‘this man’s army’)

    as far as I know Islamic nation have very little patience for child rape. Whereas here in the ‘exceptional’ country, Sandusky would rape little boys right in the Penn State locker room, and everyone up to the dean of the university knew about it.

    I have veto power over her choice in a husband

    good luck with that Talha

    if you’re raising her in the West, (such as it is)

    I hope you prevail, and your daughter is guided by your benevolent love. (But what if she finds a Christian who is otherwise the perfect man in every other way, and she loves him, and he her? )

    • Replies: @Talha
  162. Rurik says:
    @Che Guava

    I would love to hear her opinion of her father’s political activites, and why the family chose to leave for Israel.

    there’s a lot that I’m sort of becoming curious about with the enigmatic lady

    not a fan of Anna Rosenbaum

    OK, who is Anna Rosenbaum?

    I ‘binged’ her, and there’s just a bunch of Jewish doctors

    The cover of Into the Cannibal’s Pot is nystifying to you?

    well, sort of

    is she saying that white women are subject to assault by the blacks?

    I understand that S. Africa is the rape capital of the world, but I haven’t seen statistics that indicate white women are the victims. I’d think that kind of news would be sensational

    perhaps it’s more nuanced than that. Or perhaps there is a terror but it’s all hushed up. IDK

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Che Guava
  163. L.K says:
    @Rurik

    Rurik:

    pretending to dislike things like Multiculturalism and radical feminism (and even the downfall of white rule in S. Africa!) without seeing the Jewish hand behind these things, certainly must require effort.

    And yet this is exactly what Ms.Mercer does…. bc she is a Jewish activist.

    Rurik:

    But then, we’re both writing anonymously, and perhaps being a little too strident can be inconvenient in the real world, especially if you’ve made your career as a writer, no?

    Uh?? She is constantly talking shit about “Muslims’, it is not as if she is writing a revisionist book on the holohoax inc. Gimme a break.

    Rurik:
    “And she does support Trump..isn’t that worth something?”

    From your own observations I would think no… so, NO.
    BTW, Jewish activists do their thing, which comes down to ‘what is good for the Jews’… but, but this does not mean that they all see eye to eye when it comes to strategies & tactics to promote ‘what is good for the jews’. So, for example, a minority does not think that importing large numbers of Muslims into the West is good for the Jews in the long run…
    Ms.Mercer seems to be one of those.

    RUrik: “I haven’t read her on Palestine,”

    Here is something she wrote a while ago here:
    Israel was a wasteland, a swamp when Jews bought land legally from its owners (Turks held the deeds), dried the swamps, died in droves doing that, and turned a blighted spot into an oasis.

    And my answer to these ridiculous zionist LIES:

    Yawwnn… these are old, stale zionist LIES. Ilana, you know they are lies and you are still repeating this kind of BS… what does that say about you?

    First of all, it was not “Israel”, since this is an artificial zionist entity created in 48 trough terrorism, ethnic cleansing and chicanery, at the expense of the indigenous Palestinian population. No, it was not a wasteland and no, Jews did NOT buy the land legally. These are all old zio lies refuted by many scholars, including Jewish/israeli ones.
    See, for instance, “The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine” by Israeli historian Ilan Pappe or the various books by Norman Finkelstein.
    Under Zionist pressure, the UN recommended giving away 55% of Palestine to a Jewish state – despite the fact that this group represented only about 30% of the total population, and owned under 7% of the land.
    For a detailed synopsis of the conflict, see http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/

    Take care, Rurik.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  164. Corvinus says:
    @helena

    “because demos, polit groups, legislation, stigmatisation, all point to a social engineering policy that has been imposed on Europeans against their wishes. what Europeans would have preferred in the 70s would have been family planning policies to avert the reduced birthrate that triggered immigration”

    You had previously wrote you don’t know why or by whom regarding the deliberate replacement of the European ethnic group, then proceed to list several factors. You can’t even make up your mind.

    Moreover, you act as if these factors just came out of thin air. They were NOT imposed on Europeans against their wishes, as Europeans themselves agreed upon through their representatives in government. They were discussed and implemented. Certainly there are people who oppose matter. Then work to change it.

    “of course but people are influenced by policy and imagery”

    You mean propaganda. You do realize the hypocrisy, right? Are you NOT also advocating through policy and imagery that white people have children?

    “some were/are, some weren’t/aren’t. but either way they have done.”

    So now it’s SOME people who are trying to get rid of their own kind. How can YOU be certain of their intentions and motivations? Did you personally ask them?

  165. Corvinus says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “But don’t waste too much time on Corvinus, who’s just a globalist troll, with no more reasoning power than a bird. Corvinus will say anything and then attack you for not responding to his idiotic remarks.”

    It’s called discourse. Try it sometime, rather than make statements, get challenged on them, and proceed to run away when they are questioned.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  166. Corvinus says:
    @Jim Christian

    “Interesting still, Helena, that Western society was pushed and pushed to stop breeding and we conveniently forgot to tell the REAL breeders to comply.”

    First, most Americans do not look refer to things as “Western society”, they look at it as “American society”. Second, it’s all in your imagination regarding white people being pushed to “stop breeding”, since they are having children, which is their choice. If they have kids, great. If not, that’s not for you to lament about their decision. Moreover, are you not using coercion yourself to tell other people, ones considered “undesirable”, to not breed?

    • Replies: @helena
  167. helena says:
    @Corvinus

    It takes too long to challenge every flaw in your logic but just on this :

    “it’s all in your imagination regarding white people being pushed to “stop breeding”, since they are having children, which is their choice. If they have kids, great. If not, that’s not for you to lament about their decision”

    It’s not imaginary; it’s actual demography and actual family/welfare policy. (policy in the broad sense of, ‘policies are formulated for/by governments’)

    Some people having some children does not negate the actual demographic and policy actualities.

    What people choose to study, regretfully or otherwise, is their business. Telling people not to be interested in something is not an argument and it’s not called discourse, not even if your writing style is discursive.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  168. Western society was indeed coerced through social convention and shaming to stop being rabbits with their 8-plus children families. Many were the Catholic families with 12 on up to 18 kids in my old neighborhood in Northern Virginia. Today, only in the Third World do you see breed rates like that, but then, the children starve more in the third world. Earth Day brought the demands for smaller families, 2 children, three tops and women started feeling guilty about it in the West. All for the good of the planet, of course. Only ones that listened and only ones told by liberals to “save the planet” this was western society, whatever YOUR ignorant view on the subject may be. Latinos and Muslims throughout the Middle East and the folks on the African Continent and India somehow missed receipt of the message. They wouldn’t have listened to Sally Struthers on the subject in any case. And we went from then-3 billion or so (4?) to far north of 6 or 7 billion population today. All Third World population growth without a clue as to how to feed them.

    Only Western society stopped breeding. Darks however, pardon the pun, have always and continue, to breed like rats. You’re awfully sensitive on the subject. Dark much? Or are you one of the self-hating GoodWhites that insist on “saving the planet” from only yourself and your race? I have no interest except as an observer anymore. I’m enjoying the decline. From afar, a far, far better place. YOU deal with it, Cor-vee, YOU deal with it.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @cipher
  169. Rurik says:
    @L.K

    minority does not think that importing large numbers of Muslims into the West is good for the Jews in the long run…
    Ms.Mercer seems to be one of those.

    I’ve read Jews say that importing millions of Hispanics into the US might not ultimately be ‘good for the Jews’, since it’s white people who’re uniquely susceptible to the ‘guilting’ thing (we seem to have a ‘guilt gene’), even for things done before they were even alive. Latinos are likely to tell the Judíos to fuck off when the Jews demand shekels for past transgressions.

    I guess Ms. Mercer is just another stinking Jewish supremacist. Your quotes of her lies about Palestine are damning L.K. And yep, those are lies, pure and simple. (no educated person at her level is that stupid ; )

    There is no comprehensible justification for those kind of vile and obvious Zio-lies.

    Point taken

    • Replies: @Talha
  170. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Corvinus

    “[Laughs] that’s not the way it works…”
    “That is observably false.”
    “Think about it for a moment. …”
    “… you have a comprehension problem.”
    “Talk about comprehension problems.”
    “It’s called discourse. Try it sometime…”

    Caw, caw, caw.

    That’s not discourse, it’s non-stop trolling.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  171. Avery says:
    @Talha

    Yo Talha*:


    { I thought OMON troops were inclusive of their own Spetsnaz}

    No: OMON are specialized police force. Not military. Not Spetsnaz.

    Here is the chain of exchanges re Spetsnaz:

    Talha: {Your turn. I suggest asking any surviving Spetsnaz veterans about the assault on Grozny.}
    Avery: {Hey Talha: Where is your evidence that Russian troops who assaulted Grozny during First Chechen war were Spetsnaz?. My information is that during the first war, drunkard Yeltsin and incompetent Russian military leadership sent raw recruits 18-20 from Russian heartland (flatlands) into a meatgrinder manned by tough, experienced Chechen mountain fighters 25-30.}
    Talha: {“Into this chaos the Spetsnaz forces were frequently sent on special operations.”}

    Looks like the Chechen fighters did not fare so well against Spetsnaz – according to the book that you referenced.
    Here it is:

    {“In one such raid in 1995 two Spetsnaz companies each of about thirty men tasked with attacking a former government office block….The objective was to storm the building, kill those inside, set fire to the place and then retreat. ……After five minutes of intense fire from the tanks the assault force stormed the building. The sound of automatic fire could be heard from those keeping watch outside, as well as frequent explosions as the Spetsnaz troops tossed grenades into the rooms before moving inside. …….The Special Forces troops moved from floor to floor, but the Chechen fighters were determined to hold out as long as possible. As the Spetsnaz reached each floor the Chechens would throw grenades down on to their heads and spray them with automatic fires. But these attackers were not the usual underfed, under-trained and underpaid Russian conscripts who only wanted to get back home safely, but the Federation’s crack troops, privileged, well paid, well trained and keen. …..The assault on the top-floor redoubt began with an explosive charge which disintegrated the wooden floors, followed by half a dozen grenades and a non-stop torrent of bullets from machine guns which sprayed the room for several minutes. The Chechens fired back and killed as least three Spetsnaz troops during the final attack, but, in reality they stood no chance. It is not knwn whether any of the Chechens surrendered or tried to surrender, but all were killed, ruthlessly and professionally. And some of the bodies were thrown out of the top windows, to the cheers of the Spetsnaz men keeping guard in the square below.”}

    btw: that book looks very interesting. Definitely belongs in my library.

    ———-
    * I am introducing a new shoutout: I think “Yo” is more formal than “Hey” that Talha introduced a while back, and has certain gravitas that “Hey” lacks. .

    • Replies: @Talha
  172. “….if one of them told me that my daughter couldn’t go to school, one of us would leave the room on a stretcher. Yet as fighting men, are they not magnificent? ”

    It seems that “educated” women -and fighting men- in the same society are mutually exclusive.

    The devil- women in the Homo States of America will be the catalyst for Hillary Rottencrotch Clinton.

  173. Talha says:
    @Avery

    Yo Avery – or (for Rocky fans) Yo! Averiaaaan!

    Yeah – there is no doubt, Chechens will almost always lose to special forces like Spetsnaz, SEALs, SAS, etc. but they will make them pay hell for every inch. There is just no comparison; how much money and resources and training does it take to produce a single Spetsnaz versus a regular Chechen rebel? Now think about putting the same Chechen rebel through that same training and giving him the fancy gadgets and equipment, unlimited ammunition, etc….

    The Russians have always eventually overcome the Chechen resistance, whether in the 1800s or very recently. The Chechens comprise a couple of million people at most, how can they possibly marshal the resources to defeat a nation almost a hundred times their size? The fact that they were able to get Russia to quit in round one after the fall of the USSR was hugely impressive.

    Yet, even though the Spetsnaz may rout them every time, they will still hail their martial abilities:
    “‘These people. They fight like werewolves. By day they are human. By night wolves. It is much worse than Afghanistan. The Chechens are the toughest, cruellest people in the world,’ he said.
    There were six of them, in their late twenties, all from Siberia, tall and athletic with several days’ growth of beard. They were Spetsnaz – Russia’s elite special forces. They had just come out of Grozny, where they had been part of the assault on the presidential palace.”
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/elite-troops-learn-to-respect-chechen-werewolves-1569232.html

    War Nerd basically breathes this stuff and his assessment was:
    “A thousand Chechens is a serious force, and a terrifying one if they’re bearing down on your neighborhood. Chechens are the scariest fighters, pound-for-pound, in the world.”
    https://pando.com/2014/06/16/the-war-nerd-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-too-extreme-for-al-qaeda-i-s-i-s/

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Avery
  174. Talha says:
    @Rurik

    Hey Rurik,

    L.K. is on point about “She is constantly talking s* about “Muslims’”. For a person who writes books, I am amazed at how many talking points she publishes on Islam/Muslims that may as well come from the writings of Neocon/Israeli-firsters like Geller, Horowitz and Spencer. No citations for any of her opinions and usually the same tropes.

    I don’t know too much about her stuff on Israel since I haven’t read much of what she has to say on it, but I agree that quote L.K. referenced is pretty damning – the old ‘a people without a land for a land without a people’ nonsense.

    Her social commentary on liberalism’s effect on Western society seems balanced enough though – but nothing that is extremely novel compared to some other commentators.

    Peace.

  175. Che Guava says:
    @Rurik

    Anna Rosenbaum was frequently cited as the real name of Ayn Rand in print, and on the ‘net in days of yore.

    The current standard ‘Alise’ may be correct.

    I’d think that kind of news would be sensational

    You know very well that that kind of news would just be suppressed.

    Whether it is or is not true, sure, I don’t know, but looking at the experiences of Afrikaner farmers, I would guess it is, proportionately. News about crimes against them is always suppressed.

    Whether my guess about rates in general is or is not correct solely depends on the degree of avoidance of freely going out at night, and the frequency of living in hideous ‘gated communities’, not on the ‘agency’ of potential attackers.

    You will surely never hear figures on such things from the ANC govt.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  176. Avery says:
    @Talha

    Yo, Talha:

    No doubt: as I also admitted in previous posts, Chechens are outstanding warriors. They deserve to live in their own land in peace.

  177. Talha says:
    @Rurik

    Dear Rurik,

    Yeah I will definitely need some luck. I can only get her to understand things, I don’t have any legal recourse. Of course, if I’ve done my job right, I shouldn’t have to worry about it.

    Good question…what’s love got to do with it? I kid…actually a marriage between Muslims and non-Muslims is invalid – the only exception to the rule is in the case of a Muslim man marrying a Jewish or Christian lady. So, technically, the guy would have to convert – of course, again, there is little I could do legally to prevent it.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  178. Corvinus says:
    @CanSpeccy

    I don’t simply make those statements and run. There’s substantial meat to those bones. Again, why not actually engage in conversation? What are YOU afraid of?

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  179. Corvinus says:
    @helena

    “It’s not imaginary; it’s actual demography and actual family/welfare policy. (policy in the broad sense of, ‘policies are formulated for/by governments’)”

    What specific policies are put into place by say, the American government, to actually prevent white people to have children? I am talking about particular laws here.

    “Telling people not to be interested in something is not an argument and it’s not called discourse, not even if your writing style is discursive.”

    Except I never told anyone NOT to be interested in this topic, I am merely questioning your logic. Big difference.

  180. Corvinus says:
    @Jim Christian

    “Western society was indeed coerced through social convention and shaming to stop being rabbits with their 8-plus children families.”

    Social convention and shaming are not government legislation.

    “Many were the Catholic families with 12 on up to 18 kids in my old neighborhood in Northern Virginia.”

    The world has changed since the 1950’s, my friend.

    “Earth Day brought the demands for smaller families, 2 children, three tops and women started feeling guilty about it in the West.”

    No, a host of political, economic, and social factors have led to smaller families in the States.

    “Only Western society stopped breeding. Darks however, pardon the pun, have always and continue, to breed like rats. You’re awfully sensitive on the subject. Dark much?”

    It’s called being a human being. Indeed, there is a huge population uptick in Third World countries. Do you actually know the reasons why?

    “I have no interest except as an observer anymore. I’m enjoying the decline.”

    Typical. Complain mightily about the problems of western demographics, then go into a proverbial hole. What about YOUR children? How many whites in your brood?

    • Replies: @helena
  181. Che Guava says:
    @Rurik

    I didn’t manage to correct my earlier post by the time the timer expired, her mother’s name was Anna.

    Remain fairly sure that ‘Ayn’ went under the same name in early years in the US.

  182. Rurik says:
    @Che Guava

    I’ve read most of Rand’s stuff, and while I found it entertaining, and at that time in my life, (teenager when I first found one of her books laying around), her words were revolutionary for the kind of Midwestern, protestant upbringing I’d had. Here was an author saying the ‘mystics’ were clueless and that you should rely on your own mind and reason, and that it was your mind that was the seat of truth, not some moldering book written before mankind even knew what science was. I was fascinated, and plowed though Atlas and Fountainhead and Anthem and some other works.

    But I never gave her the sort of prophet status that many young men did back then. She was right about some things and wrong about some things. She was inconsistent when one of her mantras was consistency. So, like with all the greats, I took the good and tossed the bad. But she was important and refreshing for me at that time in my life.

    What are your issues with the lady? [RIP]

    Whether it is or is not true, sure, I don’t know, but looking at the experiences of Afrikaner farmers, I would guess it is, proportionately. News about crimes against them is always suppressed.

    I remember when Mugabe was going nuts and sending his thugs in to drive out the owners and steal peoples houses and farms and stuff for Mugabe’s cronies, and of course they’d often murder the farmers and/or their wives and horribly hack up the livestock for sheer cruelty’s sake. (The sub-humans that they were/are). But it wasn’t until they actually started raping the young white women that the news was finally on Drudge.

    I think certain demographics, the ones who’re hated by the Zio-Fiend the most (Kulaks, Germans, white farmers – whether they’re Serbian or S. African) are murdered with silent approval, and the crimes hushed, but somehow when it comes to raping, then the news sometimes finds its way out. But then again, considering how the news of American and Norwegian and British and Swedish young women are being raped at epidemic levels by the orcs, and it’s never mentioned at all in the media, perhaps S. Africa is a greater dystopian hell on earth than we can even possibly imagine. Wouldn’t surprise me.

  183. Rurik says:
    @Talha

    Dear Talha,

    the only exception to the rule is in the case of a Muslim man marrying a Jewish or Christian lady

    OK, see I’m learning more all the time from you!

    I didn’t realize the prohibition was only way. So it’s only the women who have to marry a Muslim man, but a Muslim man can marry Christian or Jewish or Hindu or secular women, and presumably, as many as he wants to (or can afford)

    [maybe I might convert myself ; ]

    Interesting. And do wives have to convert?

    Sometimes it’s the nuanced questions that I find the most intriguing Talha. When it gets to the nitty-gritty of what makes us tick. I can’t help but wonder where your lines in the sand are, and raising your daughter in the West, what you’re willing to compromise about. If, for instance, she were to meet and fall in love with a man who was Druze, and was a perfect man in every way, loving and intelligent, Pakistani, (has there ever been a Pakistani Druze?) and devoted with his life to your daughter.. would you prefer she would rather marry a less than perfect man who didn’t nearly love your daughter as much just because he was Sunni? Or Shia, would that matter?

    I ask respectfully of course.

    I know personally of families that have been torn apart by stuff like this. A Christian man marries a Jewish gal, and then his family objects (stridently) t0 the children being raised Jewish- that kind of thing.

    Peace my friend

    • Replies: @Talha
  184. cipher says:
    @Jim Christian

    Jim Christian,

    Family formation and maintenance is an outward sign of the couple’s faith – e.g., love for our heavenly Father + hope or optimism about the future.

    What does the absence of family formation and maintenance say about a society’s members and their shared worldview?

    What’s your plan or program to change – correct – it?

    What steps have you taken to implement said plan?

  185. helena says:
    @Corvinus

    “No, a host of political, economic, and social factors have led to smaller families in the States.”

    Earth Day is a ‘social factor’!

    as for politics, ‘political’ and ‘policy’ might even be from the same word derivation, let’s see what the free dic says~;

    pol·i·cy 1 (pŏl′ĭ-sē)
    n. pl. pol·i·cies
    1. A plan or course of action, as of a government, political party, or business, intended to influence and determine decisions, actions, and other matters:
    2.
    a. A course of action, guiding principle, or procedure considered expedient, prudent, or advantageous:

    “Indeed, there is a huge population uptick in Third World countries. Do you actually know the reasons why?”

    Blow me, there was I guessing the African population is rising while the European population is falling, and turns out it is!

    ” Progress in medical science has, therefore, had a great effect on the population of most nations of the world. Nearly everywhere death rates have fallen. At the same time, birth rates, at least in the LDCs, have remained high. This combination of high birth rates and low death rates have led to the population explosion in many countries throughout the world.

    The end of the population explosion worldwide will be determined by how much countries invest in family planning efforts to lower fertility and slow down popula-tion growth.”
    http://teachersinstitute.yale.edu/curriculum/units/1998/7/98.07.02.x.html

  186. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Corvinus

    Again, why not actually engage in conversation? What are YOU afraid of?

    Caw, Caw, Caw.

    Can’t stop trolling can you Corvy.

    Why not just make your point and leave it to others to decide for themselves whether they think your point is worth a response.

    And don’t yell and use ALL CAPS, it suggests a lack of confidence in the validity of your own argument.

    • Replies: @helena
    , @Corvinus
  187. Talha says:
    @Rurik

    Dear Rurik,

    No, the exception for males is only Jews or Christians. And 4 is the limit no matter how rich, and one is expected to maintain them at the same level – very difficult to do. This seems like a lot for non-tribal sedentary people, but it is actually a restriction for tribal and nomadic folks. If you convert we’ll hook you up; nothing like swinging an Albanian on one arm and a Latina on the other, eh? I kid – you’d have to abide by the canon of the land so no polygamy around these parts, but that may change – I mean, hell, if men are marrying men…But Albanian/Bosnian women are quite the catch for someone interested in keeping things within European heritage.

    Wives have their religious rights protected by shariah, you can look through our books*:
    She cannot be proscribed in her religious practice (visiting church, prayers, etc.) and she cannot be proscribed from indulging in practices that are allowed to her in her religion (drinking wine, eating pork, etc.) – for the Malikis, this is absolute, some of the other schools have certain restrictions, such as, as long as she doesn’t get drunk (which obviously affect husband and children), etc.

    There are some lines which are honestly not up to me to choose. So for instance a Druze (even Pakistani one – if they exist) is out since they are not Muslim (as with Bahai’s, etc.) even if he is the nicest guy. As far as Sunni/Shiah. Look, I’m as Sunni as they get and consider Shiah to be heterodox – but I would rather have my daughter marry a practicing Shiah man that will respect and honor her and raise children with strong morals than a drunkard who beats her though nominally Sunni and cares not for the character he passes on to his children.

    No offence taken bro, I always welcome inquiries from you.

    May God preserve you and yours.

    *In this instance: Umdat us-Salik (Reliance of the Traveller) by the 14th century Shafi’i scholar, Ahmad al-Misri, Beheshti Zewar (Heavenly Ornaments) by the Sufi/Scholar of British-Raj India, Muhammad Thanavi (with citations to earlier works from Ibn Abidin and al-Haskafi – who are known from the East to the West among the Hanafis), Taj wal-Iklil (The Crown and the Trophy), by the Maliki jurist al-Muwaq

    • Replies: @Rurik
  188. helena says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “What are YOU afraid of?”

    I fear that evolution has just taken a nose-dive. I actually agree with a UK BLM campaigner who said that black youths do badly in school because their exuberance is seen as disruptive and that black youth need different approaches to education. But in fact, the stats show that white working class boys are by far doing the worst in UK education at the moment.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  189. Corvinus says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Now I know that you are decidedly not interested in advancing discussion, but only remaining comfortable in your echo chamber.

  190. Corvinus says:
    @helena

    “But in fact, the stats show that white working class boys are by far doing the worst in UK education at the moment.”

    Typical explanations why white working-class students underachieve include in uninvolved parenting, the impact of poverty, low literacy rates, low levels of personal aspiration, and a lack of emphais on post-industrial unemployment. It should also be noted that student performance in Great Britain has a strong positive correlation to social class.

    “Earth Day is a ‘social factor’!”

    You have only speculation, not facts.

    “as for politics, ‘political’ and ‘policy’ might even be from the same word derivation, let’s see what the free dic says~”

    Stop stalling. I asked specific policies being put into place by that actually prevent white people to have children. I am talking about particular laws here.

    • Replies: @Epochehusserl
    , @helena
  191. Rurik says:
    @Talha

    Dear Talha,

    Always intriguing and edifying

    No, the exception for males is only Jews or Christians

    when I consider the proximity (and historical ties) of Pakistani Muslims to Pakistani and Indian Hindus, I can only be confounded by information like this. What sort of tragic misunderstandings have taken place over the generations. What sort of human tragedies are happening even today in places like Kashmir and the Hindu Kush.

    I once worked very closely with a ‘trini’ for many years, and Trinidad is basically divided between (Indian) Hindus and (African) Muslims (and a smattering of others). They trade off power but basically distrust and even (to be honest) hate each other.

    So much religions intolerance in the world.

    nothing like swinging an Albanian on one arm and a Latina on the other, eh?

    no, nothing wrong with that. But as luck would have it, I’ve been in a long-term monogamous relationship with an amazing girlfriend, so I kid about several wives, but for me, I kind of agree with Oscar Wilde when it comes to marriage. “Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same”.

    a Druze (even Pakistani one – if they exist) is out since they are not Muslim

    I have to tell you Talha, this seem so very odd to me. I can only imagine a community in Kashmir (for instance) where some are Muslim and some are Hindu (I think, I’ve never been there), and so many Romeo and Juliet tragedies playing out.

    I would rather have my daughter marry a practicing Shiah man that will respect and honor her

    A good choice I would counsel. But then I’m not restricted in any way by such things. Perhaps to my detriment, but still, I like choosing my friends and lovers all based on their individual character, without regard to such things as their respective religions, or lack there of.

    Nevertheless, it’s always a pleasure to learn from you. You are teaching us all much. And with so many misconceptions about Islam, we could all use a little more understanding.

    I’d actually like to expand on some of this, but I have to go. The boss is calling.

    (I’ll be gone for about a week from posting, so enjoy the summer my friend!)

    Namate’

    As-salāmu ʿalaykum

    • Replies: @Talha
  192. @Corvinus

    The doctrine of disparate impact, cash payouts for parents, the way that higher education is financed, daycare center, the laws forbidding iq tests from being administered and how this is being applauded as a moral triumph after it was enacted after a series of violent student outbursts which continue to this very day, the enactment of zirp, no fault divorce, the gramscian revolution never ending, the requirement of a college degree for jobs that don’t really require a degree, the continued Reliance of government to use income tax to find projects in a time of capital depletion..

  193. helena says:
    @Corvinus

    “Typical explanations why white working-class students underachieve include in uninvolved parenting, the impact of poverty, low literacy rates, low levels of personal aspiration, and a lack of emphais on post-industrial unemployment. It should also be noted that student performance in Great Britain has a strong positive correlation to social class.”

    Some of that but there’s a lot to be said for the hbd explanation that those with the IQ have already risen into middle class. That’s why having more children is useful for a population. The question is, what is/are the population(s)? The Left and Right have different opinions on that.

  194. Talha says:
    @Rurik

    Dear Rurik,

    So much religions intolerance in the world.

    Definitely. As far as the limitations that Islam puts on who can marry who (not that all Muslims even adhere to these standards); it is much like the good fences make good neighbors idea that you and I have talked about. Many people on this forum express apprehension about ethnicities inter-mingling too closely – whether with inter-marriage or just physical proximity. Islam puts less of an emphasis on that rather than religious boundaries. So, it’s no big deal if a Sudanese marries an Albanian or a Malay with a Moroccan – as long as they all agree to a general framework for the interactions which is defined by the shariah (with slight differences between schools and allowances for local culture). Thus, since Christians and Jews are closer to the Muslim understanding of religious thought and practice, an intermingling is allowed for the family structure. Other traditions are just too far apart from the Islamic ethos to provide a viable framework for a family in which Islamic culture is upheld and nurtured – if both sides are nominally Muslim, Hindu, or whatever, then it works out since nobody really cares what happens to the kids’ religious upbringing. Again this is all trying to derive the wisdom behind the ruling; but the the ruling is there because it is clear in the Qur’an.

    so many Romeo and Juliet tragedies playing out

    No doubt they do – but people have to be realistic; if they are serious about practicing their religion, they should not set themselves up for heartbreak by initiating a relationship that they know has zero chance for acceptability. I feel bad for them, but there is no way to change the ruling – there are certain consensus rulings which define the borders of the religion.

    Nevertheless, it’s always a pleasure to learn from you.

    The pleasure is mine, your inquiries give me an excuse to delve into the traditional books (works that men and women sacrificed their lives to preserve) for answers.

    The boss is calling.

    Girlfriend? That’s what my kids think about my wife – 😉

    Wa alaikum assalaam – may God bring you back to us safe and sound.

    • Replies: @Avery
  195. Avery says:
    @Talha

    {Thus, since Christians and Jews are closer to the Muslim understanding of religious thought and practice,….. }

    I am no religious expert, but where do you get that Christians are closer to Muslim understanding? From a layman’s vantage point, I can see Jewish and Muslim religious thought and practice being quite similar, e.g. prohibition against pork, the concept of halal/kosher meat, the practice of circumcision, etc.

    But I see nothing in Christianity that is similar to either Jewish religion or Islam.

    • Replies: @Talha
  196. Talha says:
    @Avery

    Yo Avery,

    Well, there are two aspects to this:
    1) The Christian perspective: which is divided in how to view a religion that accepts Christ the Son of Mary (pbuh) as a truthful messenger of God (granted a Divine revelation) and confirms the virgin birth as well as accepts everything he stated as truth (Muslims accept that he only spoke the truth, we simply don’t consider the Christians to have a verifiable claim as to what they say he said). Some Christians have historically treated us as a heretical sect (much like Arians, Ebionites, etc.) – the first polemic work against Islam was called the ‘Heresy of the Ishmaelites’ by John of Damascus – while some consider us to be the equivalent of Martians with three heads. Bear in mind that differences over Christian inclusion of certain Jewish practices is a very old issue going back to James the Just (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saint-James-the-Lords-brother) and can still be seen in normative practices of some of the Orthodox churches (Ethiopian for example).
    2) The Muslim perspective: we could care less if all Christians think we are three-headed Martians; our special relationship with Christians (and Jews) has been defined within the Qur’an as well as hadith literature (for instance, the Christians of Najran were granted permission to perform their prayers in the mosque of the Prophet [pbuh] in his very presence). This includes things like being able to marry their women, eat their meat, etc. So even if the view on this special relationship is completely one-sided, it does indeed exist. And, we await his second coming (http://www.islamiclandmarks.com/syria/minaret-of-isa-as), so generally, the view is that this whole theological gap will be bridged once he arrives and resolves the differences in person.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Avery
  197. Avery says:
    @Talha

    Thanks for the explanation.
    Yo.

  198. @Lawrence Fitton

    Love the lower case syntax. Your writing is so vaginal. It’s like you’re wanting to dissolve your very being, your very consciousness, into your writing.

  199. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Somehow I think Muslims have the right idea. I hate to admit it. Just shut those man destroying sluts up! Stone or behead them if all else fails! They’re just going to keep trying to destroy men regardless. Why put up with their sheite! Use your masculinity and beat the sense back into her – before she does the same through government paid white knights to you! Yes – the Muslim religion is the future of the world – ironically – thanks to feminism! LOL!

    Thank you feminists! And FUCK YOU FEMINISTS!

  200. In theory, feminism can work, if done scientifically. As it stands, evolution built the male body/brain to maximize evolved male roles: acts of strength such as defense of the family and nation, exploration of the physical world to discover resources, political leadership, etc.

    Female bodies are maximized for evolutionary female roles: gestation, lactation, child-rearing, and managing acquired family resources.

    So, let’s say we want females to excel at male roles, as portrayed by Hollywood. Well, first we would have to change the genes of females for physical strength. CRISPR technology would have to be used so that every female from now on have muscles as big as males.

    Also, females will need a masculine skeletal structure to hold larger muscles and withstand more physical stress. They will need bigger bones and broader shoulders.

    Next, females will need to be genetically engineered to have more grey brain matter compared to white matter to allow for better non-verbal reasoning. Plus, the brain will have to be altered for better visuo-spatial abilities.

    Female ovaries will also have to be altered to produce much more testosterone, which will make the female personality less altruistic/empathetic and more violence-prone and tough-minded.

    Since CRISPR technology will make all these changes, females will need more energy production than males, since they will not only now be physically maximized for all male roles, but also for the female roles of gestation, lactation, child rearing, and managing family resources. As such, females will have to be genetically engineered for things like having a larger appetite to take in more food, more mitochondria production, better free radical protection, and so forth.

    So, what we will now have is a female that looks like a male, except for the hip bone area which needs to be wide enough to allow for child-birth and for the presence of breasts for lactation.

    Let’s just hope that males will be willing to impregnate this newly genetically designed female. But if not, scientists have already done experiments where sperm is not even needed: they can remove an egg cell, make a few tweaks to change it into an embryo without the use of sperm, and then implanting the embryo back into the female’s uterus.

    So, this new redesigned female class will have the best of both worlds, bringing forth the end to sexual dimorphism. The human species will no longer be divided into male and female. It will be a sexless species.

  201. … he quickly learns to reject his country’s heritage and look elsewhere for masculine inspiration, maybe even at Muhammad.

    That’s the point of evolution. When he realizes his country’s heritage is shit, he builds a new one out of bigger and better materials. That’s what all successful people did.

    Survival of the fittest.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS