The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Applauding the Donald’s Ongoing Creative Destruction
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Big Media, the policy veterans and the chancelleries across Europe and Britain are constantly complaining: Donald Trump has had the temerity to defy their international order, summit—and seek peace—with their enemies, and mess with the multilateral maze they call agreements. He even declared, early in June, that the US would be far better off if it negotiated bilateral trade agreements.

Or, in Trump speak, “country-on-country agreements.”

But what does an entrenched punditocracy, a self-anointed, meritless intelligentsia (which is not very intelligent and draws its financial sustenance from the political spoils system), oleaginous politicians, slick media and big money care? They’ve all worked in tandem to advance a grand government—national and transnational—that aggrandizes its constituent elements, while diminishing those it’s supposed to serve.

These political players have built the den of iniquity Trump keeps trampling. Against these forces—NAFTA, NATO, FBI, DOJ, CIA, a whole alphabet soup of acronyms that stands for the Permanent State, national and international—is Trump, still acting as a political Samson that threatens to bring the house crashing down on its patrons.

And his latest. Trump’s judicial appointments, in particular, might just prove to be “his most enduring legacy,” lamented the liberal Economist. These certainly threaten to cement the Supreme Court’s originalist bent:

“.. No president has confirmed more federal appellate judges (12) in his first year than Donald Trump. He has also seen six federal district-court judges confirmed, and one Supreme Court justice, Neil Gorsuch. Another 47 nominees await confirmation; 102 more federal judgeships remain open for Mr. Trump to fill. With two of the Supreme Court’s liberal justices, and its one unpredictable member (Anthony Kennedy) aged 79 or older, the president [will] get to name another justice [maybe two] …”

Published in June of 2016, “The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed” made the case that Donald J. Trump is the quintessential post-constitutional candidate.

In the “Opening Statement” titled “Welcome To The Post-Constitutional Jungle,” oldies will recognize a nod to the Guns N’ Roses classic, “Welcome to the Jungle,” as well as to broadcaster Mark Levin’s coinage.

We inhabit what Levin has termed a post-constitutional America. The libertarian (and classical conservative) ideal—where the chains that tether us to an increasingly tyrannical national government are loosened and power is devolved once again to the smaller units of society—is a long way away.

Where the law of the jungle prevails, the options are limited: Do Americans get a benevolent authoritarian to undo the legacies of Barack Obama, George W. Bush and those who went before? Or, does the increasingly ill-defined entity called The People continue to submit to Demopublican diktats, past and present?

The quintessential post-constitutional candidate, Trump’s candidacy was for the age when the Constitution itself is unconstitutional. Like it or not, the original Constitution is a dead letter, having suffered decades of legislative, executive and judicial usurpation.

The natural- and common law traditions, once lodestars for lawmakers, have been buried under the rubble of legislation and statute. However much one shovels the muck of lawmaking aside, natural justice and the Founders’ original intent remain buried too deep to exhume.

The Constitution has become just another thing on the list of items presidential candidates check when they con constituents.

The dissembling words of many a presidential candidate notwithstanding, the toss-up in the 2016 election was, therefore, between submitting to the Democrats’ war on whites, the wealthy and Wal-Mart, or being bedeviled by mainstream Republicans’ wars on the world: Russia, China, Assad and The Ayatollahs. Or, suffering all the depredations listed and more had Candidate Clinton been victorious.

Thus, the endorsement over the pages of “The Trump Revolution” was not necessarily for all the policies of Trump, but for The Process of Trump. Until such time when the individual is king again, and a decentralized Constitution that guarantees regional and individual autonomy has been restored—this process of creative destruction begun by Donald Trump is the best freedom-loving Americans can hope for.

Put differently, in this age of unconstitutional government—Democratic and Republican—the best liberty lovers can look to is action and counteraction, force and counterforce in the service of liberty.

And a force of nature Mr. Trump is most certainly proving to be. You name it; Trump has tossed and gored it. The well-oiled elements that sustain and make the American political spoils system cohere are suddenly in Brownian motion, oscillating like never before.

The hope expressed was that by weakening The Machine’s moving parts—Trump might just help loosen the chains that bind each one of us to government. Trump, the book argued, evinces the necessary moxie to blast away at an overweening political system. Who can deny that he has, so far, done a laudable job of fumigating some serious snake pits?

Undeterred, the Trump holy terror has even blasted the scold from Fort Vatican for living walled-off in Vatican City, while preaching to Americans that for their security needs, they must reject walls and “build bridges.”
More laudably, Trump doesn’t collapse the distinction between “America” and the U.S. government. To the political cast, “America” is the U.S. government. To them, making America great means making government great. Trump exhibits no confusion of category. He doesn’t equate “America” with the U.S. government. To Trump, making America great still means making the people great, taking his message to the people as he continues to do.

Understandably, the president still has the political players rising on their hind legs in defense of their realm. And he has hitherto shattered the totems and taboos these players enforce. Debated as never before, thanks to The Donald, are vexations like immigration, especially from “shithole countries,” Islam (“what the hell is going on with it?” he thundered), and Maxine Waters as an “extraordinarily low IQ person.” The Donald’s delicious quip.

While “The Trump Revolution” deconstructs the evolution of the Political Trump, the book, at the same time, applauds The Donald’s destructive creativity. A masculine force at full tilt, Mr. Trump continues to create new reality on the ground.

The modest hope expressed in chronicling the dynamics of creative destruction à la Trump ” was that an utterly different political animal, Donald Trump, might actually do some good for the countrymen he genuinely seems to love.

ORDER IT NOW

Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian column since 1999. She is the author of “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011) & “The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed (June, 2016). She’s on Twitter, Facebook,Gab & YouTube

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Media, Donald Trump, Supreme Court 
Hide 7 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. If the Donald in Chief really wanted to rattle some neocon cages he could start a process with Putin to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

    The upside of success for the people – and Trump – would be tremendous.

    Not so much for the nuttocons.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    This modest little column contains five hyperlinks to the page with Ms. Mercer’s book for sale on the amazon.com website.

    You can still read for free her hilarious columns about Trump published here at Unz Review in which, for example, she contemplated a cabinet with people like the Pauls.

    If you want another perspective — including a prediction that Mr. Trump would be (s)elected — go back and read the columns of Linh Dinh.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Binyamin
    Mercer has the distinction of writing the worst 'book' on Trump. I have never seen it reviewed in any publication whether print, online, mainstream or otherwise. The only person who has 'reviewed' it is Mercer herself in odd snippets. I have yet to see her book in a bookshop and I go to bookshops a lot, having lived in a rather bookish city most of my life. Her Trump book is a self funded vanity project-anyone can get a book published if they are willing to pay for its production. Having read odd passages provided by Mercer, it is clear she does not understand the meaning of the word 'deconstruction' which is an analytical approach used to dissect a text or an entire book within its historical and cultural context. On a darker note, Mercer's target audience for the book are white males with a racialist world view. The funny side to this is her attempt to Photoshop her picture, changing her appearance from Middle Eastern to North European- I understand she has been lampooned for this elsewhere. I wonder how many unsold copies of her Trump book are gathering dust in her dingy apartment in Seattle, that most boring and provincial of towns.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Dale says:

    Demonecrosis – when a democracy becomes structurally incapable of making humane decisions regarding individual cases, reform is impossible because the rulers would lose their spoils, and political polarization shuts down anyone who deviates from the received wisdom (even if that wisdom has changed in the last 4-8 years) from productive conversation, the Democracy is already dead and the decaying carcass is the smell.

    My loathing of Trumpussolini is only ameliorated by the fact that he is breaking a century of sclerotic institutions that are simply bureaucratic nightmares that benefit only the elites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Binyamin says:
    @anonymous
    This modest little column contains five hyperlinks to the page with Ms. Mercer's book for sale on the amazon.com website.

    You can still read for free her hilarious columns about Trump published here at Unz Review in which, for example, she contemplated a cabinet with people like the Pauls.

    If you want another perspective -- including a prediction that Mr. Trump would be (s)elected -- go back and read the columns of Linh Dinh.

    Mercer has the distinction of writing the worst ‘book’ on Trump. I have never seen it reviewed in any publication whether print, online, mainstream or otherwise. The only person who has ‘reviewed’ it is Mercer herself in odd snippets. I have yet to see her book in a bookshop and I go to bookshops a lot, having lived in a rather bookish city most of my life. Her Trump book is a self funded vanity project-anyone can get a book published if they are willing to pay for its production. Having read odd passages provided by Mercer, it is clear she does not understand the meaning of the word ‘deconstruction’ which is an analytical approach used to dissect a text or an entire book within its historical and cultural context. On a darker note, Mercer’s target audience for the book are white males with a racialist world view. The funny side to this is her attempt to Photoshop her picture, changing her appearance from Middle Eastern to North European- I understand she has been lampooned for this elsewhere. I wonder how many unsold copies of her Trump book are gathering dust in her dingy apartment in Seattle, that most boring and provincial of towns.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dr. Krieger
    Say what you will. I just looked at her photos on Google. All I can say is...

    I would...

    If she'd have me. And I'm a certified, TRS donating, goy from way back.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. @Binyamin
    Mercer has the distinction of writing the worst 'book' on Trump. I have never seen it reviewed in any publication whether print, online, mainstream or otherwise. The only person who has 'reviewed' it is Mercer herself in odd snippets. I have yet to see her book in a bookshop and I go to bookshops a lot, having lived in a rather bookish city most of my life. Her Trump book is a self funded vanity project-anyone can get a book published if they are willing to pay for its production. Having read odd passages provided by Mercer, it is clear she does not understand the meaning of the word 'deconstruction' which is an analytical approach used to dissect a text or an entire book within its historical and cultural context. On a darker note, Mercer's target audience for the book are white males with a racialist world view. The funny side to this is her attempt to Photoshop her picture, changing her appearance from Middle Eastern to North European- I understand she has been lampooned for this elsewhere. I wonder how many unsold copies of her Trump book are gathering dust in her dingy apartment in Seattle, that most boring and provincial of towns.

    Say what you will. I just looked at her photos on Google. All I can say is…

    I would…

    If she’d have me. And I’m a certified, TRS donating, goy from way back.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Trump’s nominal battles with the alphabet globalists/Deep State are mostly eyewash, an admixture of negotiation-by-tweet and plain dog-and-pony show. We’re now 1.5 years into his Presidency, and

    *deportation of illegals has been cut by 50%
    *US/Mex border, except for some local enforcement (Texas), gone
    *insourcing of H1B dot-Indian streetshitters has been doubled
    *insourcing of Black Muslim savages from Sudan/Somalia has been doubled
    *deficits/debt now spun completely out of control
    *DC Swamp now deeper than ever
    *Obamacare still ongoing
    *NAFTA ditto
    *etc.

    what the Issacsohn-Mercer really likes about Trump: he’s the most violent Wall Street/Zionist-stooge US Prez yet: defunding the Palestinians, accelerating the arming of Israhell, continues to back the Israhell/Saudi massacres in Syria and Yemen, and is heading straight for a war with Iran on behalf of Israhell.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. The quintessential post-constitutional candidate, Trump’s candidacy was for the age when the Constitution itself is unconstitutional. Like it or not, the original Constitution is a dead letter, having suffered decades of legislative, executive and judicial usurpation.

    The natural- and common law traditions, once lodestars for lawmakers, have been buried under the rubble of legislation and statute. However much one shovels the muck of lawmaking aside, natural justice and the Founders’ original intent remain buried too deep to exhume.

    The Constitution has become just another thing on the list of items presidential candidates check when they con constituents.

    Very true. Actually, the Constitution was fatally flawed from the word “go.” I mean, if you start from the premise that the central government has only the powers specifically enumerated in the text of the document, and then immediately add the first ten amendments saying what that government is forbidden to do, you already have a massive contradiction: in the absence of any enumerated authority to regulate speech or religion, the fedgov can’t do those things, but then you add an amendment saying,”oh, by the way, you can’t regulate speech or religion?” From this nonsense comes the idea that the fedgov can do anything not explicitly forbidden by the Bill of Rights. Not that it matters how the document is read anyway, since it’s simply ignored whenever it is inconvenient to our rulers’ purposes. A dead letter, indeed.

    Another excellent piece from Ilana.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored