The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Apartheid In Black and White: Truth About the Afrikaner (1)
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_279507872

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In a recent translation of Tacitus’ Annals, a question was raised as to whether “there were any ‘nations’ in antiquity other than the Jews.” Upon reflection, one suspects that the same question can be posed about the Afrikaners in the modern era.

In fact, in April of 2009, former South African President Jacob Zuma infuriated the “multicultural noise machine” the world over by stating: “Of all the white groups that are in South Africa, it is only the Afrikaners that are truly South Africans in the true sense of the word. Up to this day, they [the Afrikaners] don’t carry two passports, they carry one. They are here to stay.”

Indeed, the Afrikaners fought Africa’s first anticolonial struggles, are native to the land and not colonists in any normal sense. Yet the liberal world order has only ever singled out Afrikaners for having established apartheid, considered by the Anglo-American-European axis of interventionism to be “one of the world’s most retrogressive colonial systems.”

However, while the honing of apartheid by the Afrikaner National Party started in 1948, after Daniel Malan assumed the prime minister’s post, elements of the program were part of the policy first established in 1923 by the British-controlled government.

There was certainly nothing Mosaic about the maze of racial laws that formed the edifice of apartheid. The Population Registration Act required that all South Africans be classified by bureaucrats in accordance with race. The Group Areas Act “guaranteed absolute residential segregation.” Pass laws regulated the comings-and-goings of blacks (though not them alone), and ensured that black workers left white residential areas by nightfall.

Easily the most egregious aspect of flushing blacks out of white areas was the manner in which entire communities were uprooted and dumped in bleak, remote, officially designated settlement sites— “vast rural slums with urban population densities, but no urban amenities beyond the buses that represented their slender lifelines to the cities.”

Still, apartheid South Africa sustained far more critical scrutiny for its non-violent (if unjust) resettlement policies than did the U.S. for its equally unjust but actively violent mass resettlement agenda, say, in South Vietnam. (See Sophie Quinn-Judge, “Lawless Zones,” The Times Literary Supplement, February 26, 2010.)

Or, before that. In his magisterial “History of the American People,” historian Paul Johnson, a leading protagonist for America, details the rather energetic destruction and displacement by Andrew Jackson of the “the oldest American nations,” the Indians.

Nor should we forget subsequent American military misdeeds. There was, for instance, the 1890 “Wounded Knee” bloodbath in South Dakota (where a U.S. cavalry regiment wiped out, within an hour, between 150 and 300 Native Americans, women and children included). A decade later occurred the war in the Philippines, where a million Filipinos perished at American hands. The 1990 book “In Our Image,” written by historian Stanley Kurnow, reports that at least 200,000 of the dead Filipinos in that war were civilians. Many of the civilians breathed their last in disease-ridden concentration camps which were known as reconcentrados.

ORDER IT NOW

It was the British, not the settler ancestors of the contemporary Afrikaners, who vanquished the locals with the express purpose of producing British-type “free” societies. The horrors of British concentration camps during the Boer War are well documented. And there is little to be said in extenuation of Britain’s Zulu Wars, which were summarized in an extract from the once-famous 1930 historiographical parody “1066 And All That”: “War Against Zulus. Cause: the Zulus. Zulus exterminated. Peace with Zulus.”

Why so many conservatives still defend Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt is a mystery. The fact is that between 1942 and 1945, the FDR administration dispensed with habeas corpus in order to relocate en masse, and confine in camps, some 112,000 Japanese aliens and American-born citizens of Japanese ancestry. These Japanese internees were penned in camps, their bank accounts frozen often for years, without being charged with any crime.

Nothing in Afrikaner rule, even at its least enlightened, can match such episodes in American history.

The offending National Party began to dismantle apartheid almost a decade before the transition to democracy. By 1986, the party had already brought down apartheid’s pillars. “Beginning in the early 1980s, the South African government expanded democracy by drawing colored people and Indians into Parliament.” By the end of the 1980s, the pernicious influx control laws had been scrapped, public facilities desegregated, and racial sex laws repealed. “Blacks were allowed full freehold rights to property” and admission to historically white universities.

Next week: “Apartheid: A Strategy for Survival”

Citations are in “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons For America From Post-Apartheid South-Africa” (2011) by ilana mercer, who has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian column since 1999. She’s on Twitter, Facebook,Gab& YouTube

 
• Category: Foreign Policy, History • Tags: Afrikaner, South Africa 
Hide 305 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I don’t know why Ilana brings up American dirty laundry. They weren’t the ones killing Boers; the Brits were. And when the Brits could no longer kill the Boers they demonized them to the point where it was considered acceptable for black South Africans to kill them. And now Theresa May has endorsed land confiscation “as long as it’s legal.” So nothing’s changed for Britain.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Did you see the recent clip of May “dancing” with black school children in SA? It’s a pretty damning statement on how low the British political class has sunk that this loathsome bitch attained a prominent position. (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)
    , @Anonymous
    Only a Jewess could twist news from South Africa into a two-minute hate against America.
    , @republic
    Not a very good article. This writer's race caused a lot of the problems the Boers today are facing in South Africa.

    Before he died in 2002, the late great white nationalist, Dr. Pierce gave a lot of speeches which are still available today on the real reasons for why the last white government gave up its rule in SA.

    The lesson of South Africa

    said among other things that the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers, also the jews were pumping spiritual poison into the White population urging them to surrender rather than fight. But Pierce said it was the betrayal by the Boer establishment- the Boer politicians and church leaders and big businessmen which sealed the fate of South Africa
    , @Patricus
    The North American oppression of indigenous peoples was nothing like the South African domination of the blacks. Our predecessors died overwhelmingly from diseases like small pox. They were not a passive peoples like Africans. Native people could be among the most cruel and barbaric people known in history.

    Not to gloat over the current fate of the Boers. If anything they have a greater claim to that country than the Negroes. They predated almost all of them. In the next decades South Africa will decline to a sad state. Maybe the Chinese can enslave them or starve them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. try as she might, the (((Issacsohn-Mercer))) will never be able to make amends for her own, her family’s, and other SA Jews’ predominant role in destroying White South Africa.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MacNucc11
    But at least she does try and that counts for something.
    , @Che Guava
    Since you have already said it, no need for me to post a reminder.

    As for the internment of 'Japanese-Americans', from reading Japanese sources, this may have been better if more selective, but there were many spies on Oahu.

    In California, the majority of adults of Japanese descent were members of the 'Imperial Rule Assistance Association', by 'imperial' they did not mean Napoleon or the George who was king of England at the time.

    Much spying in California, too.

    The Imperial Rule Assistance Association was one of the several pillars of our version of fascism.

    So, though they should have been more differentiated on such bases, internment was totally logical.

    Modern U.S.A. accounts of the injustice are laughable.

    They were not treated inhumanely.

    That is not to say that Pearl Harbour was not a trap set by the U.S.A. prez to make an excuse to godawaah, and very evil he was in that. His true interest was in Europe, not the Pacific and eastern Asia.
    , @kuladanga
    Gosh, you folks have got it bad. I notice every time Ms Mercer posts, she gets trolled for being Jewish or for her politics. With the same rhetoric the neo-Maoist left uses to shut down the discourse. So either come out with some facts as to why this article should not be read, and Madame should not be allowed to post, or shut it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. @Bragadocious
    I don't know why Ilana brings up American dirty laundry. They weren't the ones killing Boers; the Brits were. And when the Brits could no longer kill the Boers they demonized them to the point where it was considered acceptable for black South Africans to kill them. And now Theresa May has endorsed land confiscation "as long as it's legal." So nothing's changed for Britain.

    Did you see the recent clip of May “dancing” with black school children in SA? It’s a pretty damning statement on how low the British political class has sunk that this loathsome bitch attained a prominent position. (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Apex Predator
    (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    Pummeling people with V2 rockets, glide bombs, and gravity bombs seems an exceptionally peculiar way to show admiration.

    Sorry for the OT, but that struck me as comical.
    , @The Alarmist
    As Home Secretary prior to rising to PM, Mrs. May had access to the vast data gathered by the UK's intelligence apparatus as well as much shared among Five Eyes members. There is little doubt that, like in the US government, most of the major politicians in the UK are hopelessly compromised and therefore beholden to she or he who holds the data. What drives the Deep State insane about Trump is that he is difficult to blackmail because at some point he just says "eff it," which means they are probably running him by more overt threats.

    To Bragadocious' question about dredging up the US history, we assumed the mantle of Leader of the Free world (more like Leader of the Fee World, if you ask me), and became instrumental in regime change in South Africa. The US is fair game, especially when you see it's former African American President standing in SA and giving a virtual stamp of approval to its new racist policies.

    What is happening to the Boers in SA is an atrocity by any reasonable measure, but it is winked at by the Western Establishment because they too are engaged in a war on a certain class of people who won't go quietly into the dark night.
    , @Bragadocious
    What's funny about the dancing video is that the British press is completely obsessed with it, while ignoring her damaging and lethal comments about land confiscation. In other words, the Brits love to chatter about optics and social faux pas, proving yet again that they're highly overrated as a so-called thinking peoples.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. llloyd says: • Website

    I hear the whine. What’s South African history to do with America? Presumably, the Japanese Americans got their bank accounts unfrozen after the war. An improvement on the treatment of the Palestinians’ frozen bank accounts by Israel after 1948. They went into the Israel treasury by Israel law. But I suppose that is anti-Semitic to bring that up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Anonymous[132] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bragadocious
    I don't know why Ilana brings up American dirty laundry. They weren't the ones killing Boers; the Brits were. And when the Brits could no longer kill the Boers they demonized them to the point where it was considered acceptable for black South Africans to kill them. And now Theresa May has endorsed land confiscation "as long as it's legal." So nothing's changed for Britain.

    Only a Jewess could twist news from South Africa into a two-minute hate against America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Well, the American can do better than a Jewess, the Americans even bombed, killed and waterboarded millions of people for decades on fabricated WMD allegations without provocation, wage an all out trade war by allege Chinese stealing their technologies without proof, while they are benefiting handsomely from Chinese supplied cheap and quality materials to maintain their living standard that they cannot afford themselves, etc.

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate ....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Watching says:

    Anyone usurping the land and rights of another people, is a criminal interloper. Putting them under a microscope and attempting to delineate subtle differences is a waste of time and adds to the crimes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Even accepting your simplifications it is reasonable to ask you to spell out
    1. What differences in legal title you recognise when you refer to the "land and rights of another people" considering the different systems by which individuals or families or institutions could/can have title and those where there is nothing but e.g. seasonal grazing grounds for a whole tribe (who might have had to battle for it from time to time) but, maybe, a much bigger population could be supported by irrigation and agriculture (If that is relevant as it would have to be in some circumstances)?
    2.What constitutes "usurping"
    3. Is there any period of limitation on the duty to treat the usurpation as criminal? How about the Normans in England, Wales and Ireland? How about the white Canadians in Newfoundland? The white genes in every descendant of Tasmanian Aborigines? Each remnant of a Native American tribe? Etc. etc.
    , @Fran800
    Anyone usurping land and rights of another people Is a criminal interloper? Really? The most monstrous example of this is the Muslims, first the conquest of about half the Roman Empire, including North Africa and most of Spain. Then, the relentless onslaught of Turks against the Byzantine Empire in the East, with the enslavement of Greeks and Cypriots, Armenians, Bulgarians, Serbs, Romanians, with hundreds of years warfare against Germans, Italians, etc. in the West, Russians in the East. Nothing in the world is more vile than the Arabs and the Turks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Did you see the recent clip of May “dancing” with black school children in SA? It’s a pretty damning statement on how low the British political class has sunk that this loathsome bitch attained a prominent position. (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    Pummeling people with V2 rockets, glide bombs, and gravity bombs seems an exceptionally peculiar way to show admiration.

    Sorry for the OT, but that struck me as comical.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    You are a dumb-ass.
    , @HdC
    If you cannot take the heat get out of the kitchen!
    Ie. don't declare war on Germany, bomb its citizens, and then whine and moan that those nasty Germans retaliated.
    Mind you, typical British nonsense.
    , @my2cents
    When someone declares war on you because their psyche cannot handle Germany being the second largest economy in the world after the U.S and their aim is to break it up......then engage in the targeted bombing of German cities killing Women and children, the eventual result after 4 months of hitting German cities was that Berlin decided to hit London and the population there could not understand any of it. No one told them that their Government had been hitting German Cities for 4 months. You might want to check your history books. Bombings are not funny or comical, not in Germany and not in London. I was fire bombed 3 times by the U.S. with a faulty atlas on May 19, 21 and 23, 1945 in the Netherlands....I went to school in a bombed out building.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. I wonder what truth is being revealed.
    The Boers, mainly of Dutch and German origin, drove the original peoples from their lands, in wars.
    These wars were extremely one sided, repeater rifles against javelins etc.
    How many casualties among the javelin people, never saw any estimate.
    With the end of racism, and democracy, the Boers etc became a minority.
    A relative of mine lived in S Africa from 1955 until 1985, then the first bombs exploded, and, as he had the Dutch pension age, 65, he and his wife left for the Netherlands, though he loved S Africa.
    He died not so long ago, visited S Africa until high age, and told me about deteriorating conditions, the country in general, but especially how whites were treated.
    He said ‘they all (whites) want to leave, but most of them cannot’, financially.
    There can be long discussions about the moral side of the conflict between black and white, who owns the land, etc., what happens is clear to me: a rich country going the Zimbabwe way.
    I never saw my relative as a racist, yet he was of the opinion that ‘the blacks are completely useless’.
    In my opinion just a statement of fact.

    Read More
    • Replies: @George F. Held
    The original black inhabitants of SA died out from disease after contact with the Boers. Other blacks came south into SA only because the Boers offered them jobs in farming, etc. The blacks there now are not the original inhabitants of SA and have now stolen the land from the Boers and Brits.
    , @DeriKuk
    "These wars were extremely one sided, repeater rifles against javelins etc."

    I don't think there were "repeater" muskets - let alone rifles - before the 1860s... which by my reckoning comes a few years after 1652. Please pay attention to these little details before you besmirch you own arguments in the future.
    , @Davy de Verteuil
    Yeah right: I never saw my relative as a racist, yet he was of the opinion that ‘the blacks are completely useless’.
    In my opinion just a statement of fact........ Yeah, Just NAZI = hateful=bigot
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Did you see the recent clip of May “dancing” with black school children in SA? It’s a pretty damning statement on how low the British political class has sunk that this loathsome bitch attained a prominent position. (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    As Home Secretary prior to rising to PM, Mrs. May had access to the vast data gathered by the UK’s intelligence apparatus as well as much shared among Five Eyes members. There is little doubt that, like in the US government, most of the major politicians in the UK are hopelessly compromised and therefore beholden to she or he who holds the data. What drives the Deep State insane about Trump is that he is difficult to blackmail because at some point he just says “eff it,” which means they are probably running him by more overt threats.

    To Bragadocious’ question about dredging up the US history, we assumed the mantle of Leader of the Free world (more like Leader of the Fee World, if you ask me), and became instrumental in regime change in South Africa. The US is fair game, especially when you see it’s former African American President standing in SA and giving a virtual stamp of approval to its new racist policies.

    What is happening to the Boers in SA is an atrocity by any reasonable measure, but it is winked at by the Western Establishment because they too are engaged in a war on a certain class of people who won’t go quietly into the dark night.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist

    ......war on a certain class of people who won’t go quietly into the dark night.
     
    At least some won't.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. shegetz says:

    With the tribal blacks of SA, it was always a matter of might is right. Now they have the power, they will be relentless.

    While the author was, to my limited knowledge anyway, a vocal advocate for the end of Apartheid, she has left the outcome and afaik is now in Israel, where the government will back you as a Jew, far more than it seems gentile whites get in the West nowadays in diversitopia.

    We know what is coming down the pipeline when we are reduced to minority in our lands, as it stands a Jewishly led and coordinated situation and one Jews in Israel would never countenance for themselves in their homeland as they know their own survival is at stake. They’d be made short work of by their enemies on all sides.

    So why are so many Jews openly engineering white minority in Anglophone countries and Western Europe? As the outcome is very probably a highly hostile situation for gentile whites to live in, given all the Jewishly led laws about racism that are lenient on minority racism against whites in the form of rape and brutality, but bring the sword of Damocles upon any white that opens their mouth against mass immigration/reduction to minority, it can only be interpreted the way it is, veiled hostility for gentile whites.

    Galling for Anglophones, we sacrificed, fought, killed and likewise perished in global conflagration not that long ago. What was it all for when the Jewish elite sell us out like this today?

    Sadly, unlike the author, living as I understand in a heavily armed society, with compulsory military service, a culture fostering excellence, nuclear options as insurance, even (unbelievably) generous USA taxpayer subsides, there is virtually nowhere for white gentiles to go. Otherwise we fight or perish.

    My heart goes out to the Afrikaner. Indeed, so did my wallet, but I suspected the charity operator used some of the funds for a personal holiday, so once bitten as they say.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Destroying the most capable group in the world may be the objective, out of revenge, and/or in an effort to control the world.
    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    Weird people, jews.
    The German Sarrazin, former member of the Board of the Bundesbank, the German Fed, outstanding economist, former senator of Berlin, in 2010 wrote a book on how immigration destroys Germany, by importing stupidity.
    Merkel fired him immediately.
    His next book was about the euro disaster.
    Now a book by him on the dangers of Islam has appeared.
    A Dutch jewish journalist, Joshua Livestro, writes that the book should be forbidden.

    Unable to understand writings like this, do not people like this Joshua see that Muslims are not friends of jews ?
    Or is it that the nationalism of men like Sarrazin is seen as the greater evil for jews ?

    https://tpo.nl/2018/08/30/dit-nieuwe-boek-van-thilo-sarrazin-moet-volgens-joshua-livestro-worden-verboden/

    , @Joe Wong
    The White Europeans including their offshoots is where is now, still filthy rich (although always complaining), because of those hundreds of millions of people all over the world who were robbed and murdered, those who become victims of their very madness of colonialism and orientalism, of the crusades and the slave and Opium trades. Cathedrals and palaces, museums and theatres, train stations – all had been constructed on horrid foundations of bones and blood, and amalgamated by tears. There were so many centuries of plunder that the acts of looting the world for the sole benefit of the few, turned into inseparable part of the ‘Western existence and culture’, something that gets almost never addressed, let alone criticized.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. @Apex Predator
    (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    Pummeling people with V2 rockets, glide bombs, and gravity bombs seems an exceptionally peculiar way to show admiration.

    Sorry for the OT, but that struck me as comical.

    You are a dumb-ass.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. So what was Zuma saying about those holding a passport in addition to the South African one… he was signalling out Jews as being the interloper group!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. @shegetz
    With the tribal blacks of SA, it was always a matter of might is right. Now they have the power, they will be relentless.

    While the author was, to my limited knowledge anyway, a vocal advocate for the end of Apartheid, she has left the outcome and afaik is now in Israel, where the government will back you as a Jew, far more than it seems gentile whites get in the West nowadays in diversitopia.

    We know what is coming down the pipeline when we are reduced to minority in our lands, as it stands a Jewishly led and coordinated situation and one Jews in Israel would never countenance for themselves in their homeland as they know their own survival is at stake. They'd be made short work of by their enemies on all sides.

    So why are so many Jews openly engineering white minority in Anglophone countries and Western Europe? As the outcome is very probably a highly hostile situation for gentile whites to live in, given all the Jewishly led laws about racism that are lenient on minority racism against whites in the form of rape and brutality, but bring the sword of Damocles upon any white that opens their mouth against mass immigration/reduction to minority, it can only be interpreted the way it is, veiled hostility for gentile whites.

    Galling for Anglophones, we sacrificed, fought, killed and likewise perished in global conflagration not that long ago. What was it all for when the Jewish elite sell us out like this today?

    Sadly, unlike the author, living as I understand in a heavily armed society, with compulsory military service, a culture fostering excellence, nuclear options as insurance, even (unbelievably) generous USA taxpayer subsides, there is virtually nowhere for white gentiles to go. Otherwise we fight or perish.

    My heart goes out to the Afrikaner. Indeed, so did my wallet, but I suspected the charity operator used some of the funds for a personal holiday, so once bitten as they say.

    Destroying the most capable group in the world may be the objective, out of revenge, and/or in an effort to control the world.
    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    Weird people, jews.
    The German Sarrazin, former member of the Board of the Bundesbank, the German Fed, outstanding economist, former senator of Berlin, in 2010 wrote a book on how immigration destroys Germany, by importing stupidity.
    Merkel fired him immediately.
    His next book was about the euro disaster.
    Now a book by him on the dangers of Islam has appeared.
    A Dutch jewish journalist, Joshua Livestro, writes that the book should be forbidden.

    Unable to understand writings like this, do not people like this Joshua see that Muslims are not friends of jews ?
    Or is it that the nationalism of men like Sarrazin is seen as the greater evil for jews ?

    https://tpo.nl/2018/08/30/dit-nieuwe-boek-van-thilo-sarrazin-moet-volgens-joshua-livestro-worden-verboden/

    Read More
    • Replies: @shegetz
    Merkel, as you likely know, was a leading Communist, currently masquerading as a conservative.

    We are in an age of dysgenics and saturation with subversion. I do not know enough about history to draw comparison, but there is very likely method to the madness.

    "Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand"

    ... attributed to Jesus Christ (Matthew 12:25) but can as readily be seen in this onslaught to splinter nation states with so-called multiculturalism. The age old principle of divide and rule.

    Al-Hijrah enabled by a Jewish elite is a form of warfare on the Western white gentile. As you wonder, the motive may well be the dissolution of the nation state. As much is known in earlier publications of the CFR.
    , @Malla

    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.
     
    LOL India is already going deep under Jewry as we speak.

    MODI APCO SHIN BET

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2018/03/27/modi-apco-shin-bet/

    A PR firm run by the ‘chosens’ handled Modi’s election campaign. Including the Shining Gujrat b.s.(Gujrat, the state where Modi was chief minister before becoming Prime Minister)

    Also, check out their outreach to (influence in) the Indian media.

    THE KOSHER “EDUCATION” OF INDIAN MEDIA

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/the-kosher-education-of-indian-media/

    Israeli security firms, closely connected to the Israeli Military, provide security to the Indian Parliament !

    UNIT 8200 ,SERAYET MATKAL AND INDIAS CYBER SECURITY

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/unit-8200-serayet-matkal-and-indias-cyber-security/

    Some notable Israeli companies (all closely connected to the Israeli Military) which deserve mention
    NICE Systems, (High Tech recording of the Indian Parliament )
    Akamai Technologies (Election Commission Of India Private mobile Handsets)
    ECI Telecom ,(ECI’s top position in the Indian transmission market, with 25% share of the country’s metro optical network hardware market.)

    Below we observe Hinjew Indians proudly announce how they are preparing to be good Goyim slaves to the Top Dog Jews

    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/mmnmmm.png
    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/admdsa.png
    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/randa-2.png

    As far as China

    CHINAS “REVOLUTIONARY” JEWS

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/jews-in-china-mao-era/

    CHINESE COMMUNISM? YES BUT IT WAS JEWISH WHEN IT STARTED

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/06/07/chinese-communism-yes-but-it-was-jewish-when-it-started/

    The money looted out of China during the Opium War was itself used to fund Mao and his CCP movement. The elites are deviously brilliant or what?

    Also
    HOW ISRAEL USED WEAPONS AND TECHNOLOGY TO BECOME AN ALLY OF CHINA

    https://www.newsweek.com/china-israel-military-technology-beijing-jerusalem-saul-eisenberg-weapons-607117

    Taking over the non White world will be much easier than you think. Lots of corrupt people, people who will sell anything for a few shekels.
    , @Erebus

    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.
     
    For all but (arguably) the first two, it's very easy to see. They'll accept it because they'll be unaware of it. Europeans and N. Americans accepted it without a murmur because they had little idea of it, and had much to distract them. Why wouldn't the rest?
    Russia & China are outliers. They're blessed by the fact that their current elites are hyper-sensitive to how power operates in the world for the simple reason that they aspire to take the heart of it. They know who has to be taken down a notch, and they know from whence power springs.
    , @Respect
    Why Holland does not repatriate the boers ?? , or Merkel . Central Europe is full of muslims , and you don`t repatriate boers ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Malla says:

    Interesting piece about Rhodesia

    From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe
    By: Anthony C. LoBaido

    [MORE]

    At the inaugural ceremony, Prime Minister Mugabe’s call for reconciliation between blacks and whites came as a welcome surprise to those who had for years dismissed him as “a Marxist-terrorist trying to gain power through the barrel of a gun.” … The unexpected size of his majority gave Mugabe an unequivocal mandate…. All in all, the election and handover represented a triumph of democracy in the face of considerable external pressure.
    — Andrew Young
    President Carter’s Ambassador to the United Nations
    The excerpted statement above by Andrew Young provides a small sampling of the outrageous commentary on Robert Mugabe’s ascension to power in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) in an essay penned by Young for Foreign Affairs’ special report, “America and the World, 1980.” As President Jimmy Carter’s emissary to Africa, Young played a pivotal role — along with Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, and other Carter administration officials — in enthroning Mugabe’s terror regime and turning much of the Dark Continent into the nightmarish slaughterhouse of chaos and terror it has become.
    Two years earlier, in 1978, Ambassador Andrew Young described Robert Mugabe in an interview with the Times of London. “Does Mr. Mugabe strike you as a violent man?” the Times reporter asked. “Not at all, he’s a very gentle man,” Young replied. “In fact, one of the ironies of the whole struggle is that I can’t imagine Joshua Nkomo, or Robert Mugabe, ever pulling the trigger on a gun to kill anyone. I doubt that they ever have.”
    Ambassador Young could barely contain his brimming admiration for the newest “liberator” of Africa’s oppressed: “I find that I am fascinated by his intelligence, by his dedication. The only thing that frustrates me about Robert Mugabe is that he is so damned incorruptible.”
    Andrew Young knew better. During the 1970s, as Mugabe competed with his sometime ally and former mentor Joshua Nkomo for primacy in the “liberation” movement in Rhodesia, he proudly identified himself as a Maoist and proved himself one of the most ruthless terrorist leaders. His Chinese-sponsored ZANU-PF guerrillas, operating out of the neighboring communist regimes in Mozambique, Zambia, and Angola, terrorized black villages, and tortured and killed opponents.
    This was all well known not only to Andrew Young but to other pillars in the American foreign policy establishment who were promoting Mugabe as the “gentle,” “incorruptible” savior of Rhodesia. Foreign Affairs, from whence came Mr. Young’s quote at the beginning of this article, is, of course, the house journal of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), arguably the most influential “brain trust” in the world. The council, of which Young was a prominent member, had promoted Mugabe in its literature and had hosted him as an honored speaker during his long terror campaign to take control of Rhodesia. David Rockefeller, chairman of the CFR during that period, called Mugabe a “very reasonable and charming person.” Likewise, the New York Times, Washington Post, and virtually all the rest of the major print and broadcast media choir had persistently sung his praises, ignoring his well-documented record of atrocities against civilian men, women, and children — black and white.

    But in the past few years, Mugabe’s erstwhile supporters have been forced to acknowledge that he is the brutal communist dictator that his critics had exposed him as more than 30 years ago. He has bathed Zimbabwe in blood, turned it into a police state, and ruined what was previously one of the most prosperous economies in Africa. Finally, the former darling of the Liberal Establishment has been repudiated by virtually all except Communist China and his fellow African Marxist despots.
    A Beacon Extinguished
    How could Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, a thriving, vibrant, multi-cultural example of Western-style civilization, once a shining beacon for Africa, have turned into hell on Earth?
    Rhodesia’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) from Great Britain came in 1965, only a few short decades after England’s 1923 annexation of Southern Rhodesia from the South Africa Company. Under the UDI, Rhodesia pulled away from the Mother Crown rather than negotiate with Mugabe’s terrorists, as it was being pressured to do by White Hall and the powerbrokers in London. Rhodesians were all too familiar with the chaos and tyranny that had befallen neighboring countries that had capitulated to such pressure. Rhodesian leader Ian Smith, a fighter pilot who was shot down over Italy during World War II while fighting for the Allies, stood up to the Maoist, Marxist, and Communist penetration in the region all by himself. This while the rest of the Western world, wounded from Vietnam and menaced by the old Soviet Union, sat idly by — or worse yet, helped the communist-backed terrorists.
    Smith traveled to Washington, D.C., to ask for help. He wasn’t asking for foreign aid; he merely hoped to persuade President Carter to call off the economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure being applied by the U.S. State Department, the UN, and Britain in an attempt to force Rhodesia to accept rule by the Mugabe/Nkomo terrorist forces. Carter flatly refused to see Smith.
    Henry Kissinger, meanwhile, did meet with Smith in Geneva. But if Smith thought that he would receive kinder treatment from the former secretary of state and adviser to Republican presidents, he was in for a rude awakening. Precisely what threats or pressures were brought against him is not known, but Smith, who had previously pledged not to surrender to the terrorists “in ten thousand years,” was a changed man after the meeting. He is said to have aged 10 years in that one week in Geneva. It has been suggested by African observers that Smith was threatened with a military invasion of Rhodesia backed by the UN, the United States, and the U.K.
    That is entirely plausible, as such talk was in the air and detailed plans for a military invasion of South Africa had been drawn up and published by policy wonks at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace.
    Smith asked Kissinger about things like history, culture, civilization, and loyalty. After all, Rhodesia had fought for the West in the great battles of the 20th century, including World War II and the Korean War. Kissinger firmly told Smith something truly sad and even frightening, “I am afraid those things have no place in the modern world.”
    Kissinger added that “white regimes would not survive in Southern Africa.” Ironically, it is a fact that at that time the black peoples of Southern Africa were voting with their feet and fleeing from the communist-Marxist regimes run by black revolutionary clients of Washington, Moscow, and Beijing to the “white regimes” of Rhodesia and South Africa. The New World Order and seeds of today’s African mayhem were being firmly planted by the globalists at the Council on Foreign Relations and Britain’s Royal Institute for International Affairs.
    Under intense pressure from the Washington-Moscow-Beijing axis, South Africa, which had long fought for Rhodesia, cut off aid to Ian Smith’s government, hoping their own apartheid system would be spared by the West for doing so. The sellout was on. Many Rhodesians, including legendary soldiers like Willem Ratte, Bert Sachse, and Luther Eeben Barlow, who would become the backbone of South Africa’s elite special forces in the war in Angola against Cuba and the Soviet Union, fled to South Africa. The power vacuum created by that exodus would be filled by some of the most blood-thirsty savages Africa has ever seen.
    Mugabe’s Long Record
    Contrary to Andrew Young’s claims, Mugabe’s record proves that he was (and is) indeed “a Marxist-terrorist trying to gain power through the barrel of a gun.” And, contrary to popular misconceptions caused by decades of media disinformation, it was not Mugabe’s thugs who ended white rule in Rhodesia. Ian Smith and the legitimate black leaders of Rhodesia accomplished that in 1979 in multi-racial elections that brought a black majority government to power under a former Nkomo/Mugabe comrade, Bishop Abel Muzorewa, who had renounced violence to work for peaceful change.
    Mugabe and Nkomo tried to stop the elections with threats, intimidation, and terror. Mugabe issued a “death list” of the black leaders who were cooperating for a peaceful transition to black rule, calling them “traitors,” “opportunistic running-dogs,” and “capitalist vultures.” Nevertheless, 64 percent of Rhodesia’s black population defied the threats and turned out to vote. And an overwhelming two-thirds of them voted for Abel Muzorewa, making him Rhodesia/Zimbabwe’s first black prime minister.
    They were very much aware of the disasters brought about by communist-backed black dictatorships in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Mozambique, Zambia, Ghana, and Namibia. They did not want “one man, one vote, one time,” which had become the rule in Africa.
    The 1979 election that elected Muzorewa and a new black majority parliament had met all the conditions demanded by the United States and Britain and was certified to be free and fair by outside observers. But the U.S. and British governments then reneged and demanded new elections that not only included Mugabe and Nkomo, but allowed their ZANU-PF (Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front) and ZAPU (Zimbabwe African People’s Union) guerrillas back into the country as well. Believing it had no choice, Rhodesia capitulated to these outrageous demands. Following a campaign of intimidation and terror, Mugabe was “elected” in 1980, proving the African dictum that the man with the most guns and the most ruthless thugs wins.
    As anti-communists had predicted, soon after coming to power Mugabe turned on his former terrorist comrade, Joshua Nkomo, who was of the minority Matabele tribe. To accomplish this, Mugabe brought in several hundred advisers from communist North Korea to train his infamous Fifth Brigade. Then he began his great Matabele Massacre. Mugabe’s Mashona tribe (or “Shona” for short) had been long-standing rivals of the Matabele, but the two tribal groups had managed to coexist peacefully in white-ruled Rhodesia. Mugabe called his ethnic cleansing operation against Nkomo and the Matabele Gukurahundi, the Shona term for “the first rain that washes away the chaff of the last harvest before the advent of spring rains proper.”
    Bitter Harvest
    Official figures vary, but it can be roughly estimated that around 30,000 Matabele were slaughtered in Mugabe’s “liberation” of Rhodesia/Zimbabwe.
    It was an ominous prelude to what would become a fascist, archetype Maoist revolution in Rhodesia, a country roughly the size of Montana. Mugabe, with the help of his own de facto Hitler Nazi Youth corps called the “Green Bombers,” would go on to slaughter Zimbabwe’s white farmers, take away their land, and plunge the nation into a hell hole of debt, hunger, hyperinflation, murder, HIV/Aids, and hopelessness.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. Malla says:

    Black Population in South Africa Has Increased by 920% in 100 Years

    TNO STAFF — MAY 30, 2013

    The black population in South Africa has increased by an astonishing 920 percent in just 100 years, mainly thanks to white farmers and western infrastructure, a new report from the Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU) has revealed.

    The report, titled “Whose Land is it Anyway,” was brought out to counter the build-up to the centenary of the 1913 Land Act in South Africa, which black supremacists and their supporters quite falsely claim was a “cornerstone of apartheid” and “land theft” from the African people.

    ARP1576224

    The TAU is the oldest agricultural union in South Africa and has been in existence since 1897.

    “Common currency has it that whites ‘stole’ land from indigenous blacks and that this theft was legally ratified by the 1913 and 1936 Land Acts which divided up the land and codified these divisions,” the TAU report said.

    In reality, “whites who came to South Africa in 1652 and thereafter found a land devoid of basic development and infrastructure, sparsely populated by meandering tribes who had no written word and whose way of life was the absolute antithesis of Western mores.

    “It is now acknowledged that the Khoi-San groups, and their sub-groups, are the indigenous peoples of South Africa.

    “Whites and black African groups arrived in various parts of the country around the same time. They met at the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and wars followed.”

    The TAU also pointed out that prior to the arrival of the whites, the black population—which as pointed out above, arrived simultaneously with the European settlers and therefore have no more claim to the country than the whites—did not have any concept of land ownership or even writing.

    “Man in his primitive state did not know the concept of ‘land tenure,’” the report continued.

    “When hunter/gatherer groups formed, the first land tenure (if it can be called that) was by nature communal. Before the arrival of the European in South Africa with his tradition of individual land ownership, communal tenure in Africa was the norm.

    “The territory inhabited and/or cultivated by a particular ethnic group was owned and/or utilized by the tribe in the name of their king or chief. Because there was no written word among these peoples, Christian missionaries took it upon themselves to learn and then write and codify the languages of the black people to whom they were ministering. They then taught these people to read and write their own language.”

    “It is known that a great migration of black people took place from the Great Lakes region southwards, eventually reaching Southern Africa. Numerous reports exist as to which tribe went where. But these reports are not the historical property of the black peoples.

    “Thus their claims to land in South Africa have no empirical foundation. They are based on oral history and folklore, and what was observed by early European travelers and missionaries, by the British colonial presence in the country, by Boer trekkers and administrators.

    “If your history is written by others, with what can you contest this history? However, the early settled areas of the black people were later generally recognized as their core areas.”

    “From the very beginning of settlement, black and white were segregated. South African history is replete with clashes over land ‘ownership’. There were no title deeds, no courts to decide who owned what.

    “Proclamations and annexations were followed by wars, clashes, agreements and disagreements, theft of livestock, sloppy boundaries and arguments over the measurement and surveying of land; borders were drawn and re-drawn; people moved all over the place and a completely differing approach to farming by both groups existed.

    “In the black community, land was communal and the product of their agricultural activities was mainly for their own consumption. This was subsistence farming, and it persists in today’s South Africa.

    “ Soon after the formation of the Union of South Africa in 1910, it was deemed imperative to settle the land question once and for all. The government (still under the British Crown) believed that if land could not be partitioned and allocated within the ambit of a Western title deed system, the very future of South Africa would be put at risk.

    “The most immediate problem was food production for a burgeoning population. (It was obvious to the British then that blacks could not produce food for surplus, and to this day this is still the case).

    “The core reason for the 1913 Land Act’s passing was the security of the whites, and particularly the farmers, to give them the necessary security of tenure on their farms to produce the food for what was still a country under the British flag, controlled essentially from London. Gold and diamonds had been discovered, and Britain was not going to give up this new jewel in the Crown.

    “Antagonists of the 1913 Act and indeed the 1936 Act should look to Britain for redress. These pieces of legislation were not apartheid Acts—they were devised in South Africa under a government controlled by Britain.

    “The current population of South Africa according to Stats SA is 52,98 million. As quoted by the SA Institute of Race Relations’ Yearbook 2012, the population of the country in 1911 was blacks: 4,018 million, whites: 1,276 million; coloreds: 525,466 and Indians: 152,094.

    “The percentages were white: 21% and black: 67%. One hundred years later, the percentage population increase of blacks was 920%.

    “But land in South Africa is a political tool. It is wielded without thought for the morrow. It is proffered within the context of a cultural more that has no place in today’s practical world. The division of land under the 1913 Land Act is a blunt weapon used to garner votes by the present SA government to seduce naïve and mostly uneducated followers who cannot feed themselves but who are asked to look upon those who can feed them as ogres who stole their land.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    Whites and black African groups arrived in various parts of the country around the same time. They met at the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and wars followed.
     
    Whites first settled the Western Cape, where a few Khoikhoi/Hottentots lived. When whites expanded to other other areas, they encountered Bantu people, who had displaced the San and Khoikhoi centuries earlier.
    , @Stan d Mute

    They then taught these people to read and write their own language.
     
    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics. We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    The East Asians and Mesopotamians with their primitive pictographic languages at least managed to innovate an impressive amount given the limitations. Africans never innovated even the most basic of concepts like the wheel. Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Watching
    Anyone usurping the land and rights of another people, is a criminal interloper. Putting them under a microscope and attempting to delineate subtle differences is a waste of time and adds to the crimes.

    Even accepting your simplifications it is reasonable to ask you to spell out
    1. What differences in legal title you recognise when you refer to the “land and rights of another people” considering the different systems by which individuals or families or institutions could/can have title and those where there is nothing but e.g. seasonal grazing grounds for a whole tribe (who might have had to battle for it from time to time) but, maybe, a much bigger population could be supported by irrigation and agriculture (If that is relevant as it would have to be in some circumstances)?
    2.What constitutes “usurping”
    3. Is there any period of limitation on the duty to treat the usurpation as criminal? How about the Normans in England, Wales and Ireland? How about the white Canadians in Newfoundland? The white genes in every descendant of Tasmanian Aborigines? Each remnant of a Native American tribe? Etc. etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @pater eusebius tenebrarum
    We should ponder whether to reclaim the land stolen by the Tervingi in AD 376, the Visigoths between AD 410 and AD 460 (these locusts were quite busy, first they sacked Rome, then they stole half of Gaul and later large swathes of the Iberian peninsula) and not to forget the Ostrogoths under Theodoric the Great around AD 480 (grabbed themselves a nice chunk of Italy).

    The difficulty is in deciding who should get it post confiscation. The supply of historically oppressed & perennially aggrieved people who can be relied upon to to bugger it up is probably insufficient in the regions concerned. Nevertheless, justice has to be served; these land thefts of yore cannot just go unpunished. Perhaps the new owners could be imported from Africa? This would kill several birds with one stone.

    Anyone doubting the wisdom of this proposal is basically Hitler.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. What are “colonists in the normal sense” and from what other kind of colonists are they to be distinguished? Also: “Nothing in Afrikaner rule, even at its least enlightened, can match such episodes in American history”. So what? Proving that A is less evil then B doesn’t prove that A isn’t evil. Is Hitler to be considered a “good guy” simply because he murdered fewer people than Stalin?

    Read More
    • Replies: @MacNucc11
    I think her point though is that it would be pretty hypocritical of Stalin to be pointing a finger at Hitler.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Malla says:

    The much-decried “Bantu education” system under Apartheid was better than what ANC ruled South Africa currently offers school children, a leading black academic has announced.

    https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2013-08-15-bantu-education-was-better-academic/

    Bantu education was better: academic
    15 August 2013

    The apartheid-era Bantu education system was much better than the current education regime, a Wits academic said in Pretoria on Thursday.

    “It was far better in terms of quality than the education that our kids are receiving nowadays. That is where the problem is,” Rabelani Dagada, a lecturer at Wits Business School, told a debate on affirmative action.

    “Affirmative action should be about empowerment. The best way to empower is not to take from those who have and give to those who don’t have. It won’t work.”

    Dagada said South Africans could only be empowered through proper education.

    “After 20 years of democracy, the education levels have plunged. It’s worse than the so-called Bantu education. The best way to do transformation, empowerment is to provide quality education.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. HdC says:
    @Apex Predator
    (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    Pummeling people with V2 rockets, glide bombs, and gravity bombs seems an exceptionally peculiar way to show admiration.

    Sorry for the OT, but that struck me as comical.

    If you cannot take the heat get out of the kitchen!
    Ie. don’t declare war on Germany, bomb its citizens, and then whine and moan that those nasty Germans retaliated.
    Mind you, typical British nonsense.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    And you reply with typical anonymous semiliterate illogicality.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Malla says:

    Before 1902 there was no black problem in the two Boer republics. The big black homelands (Zululand and Xhosaland) were outside of these republics. The mass black immigration started when the British Empire took control of the republics to provide cheap labour for the Jewish mines but also to force a multi-cultural problem onto the “rebellious” Boer nation. After the republics were swallowed up into what became South Africa under the British, the policy of Apartheid was the only means the Boers had to correct the 46 years long open border policy the British forced on them. And even then the Banking elites of London had a hand in the assassination of South African Prime Minister Verwoerd who was making good progress and gaining the support of the various black tribal leaders.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. Malla says:

    Very interesting piece about life in Rhodesia, what it was really like

    https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    Requiem for Rhodesia by Carlos Whitlock Porter

    Some snippets:

    “Salisbury is pronounced “Sauls-bry”, not Sal-is-berry. Wages are low and prices are high. It is one of the only two countries in the world which declared their independence from Britain illegally. The other one is having a holiday this year [the United States, celebrating the 200th anniversary of its own UDI].

    Is there apartheid in Rhodesia? No.

    …snip…

    “You can wait behind Africans in the post office. You can marry an Africa if you get permission. You can drink with Africans, even though normally they will not drink with you; there is a hotel between Stanley and Speke Streets in Salisbury, with a European bar on Stanley and an African bar on Speke. European means white, even if you are Japanese. They are not labelled: if you shoul d happen to enter the African bar, you will simply be told that your bar is around the corner. It is extremely difficult to mistake them, since the African bars are so much noisier. ”

    …snip…

    The University of Rhodesia at Salisbury is 50% African; in 1973 it was 10%, but due to excrement in the showers and other complaints the opinion became widespread that you had to go to South Africa to get a good education.

    You cannot, however, go to the largest (and one of the best) sports arenas in Rhodesia; that is reserved for non-whites only.

    …snip….

    “But with this difference: the average wage for a white man when I was there was 150 Rhodesian dollars a month, then about 300 American dollars; not much. But it costs 150 Rhodesian dollars a month to rent a house. An African could earn 10 dollars a week and rent a house which was in many cases almost identical from the government for 10 dollars a month. You are always hearing about their low wages, but you never hear about what they get for free. There are African, Asian, “Coloured”, and European areas in Salisbury itself which you cannot tell apart without looking at the people — attractive modern bungalows, some with cars parked outside, with the victims of oppression chatting casually in the front gardens. Whether or not these are a showcase I don’t know, but I can tell you they are resented by Rhodesian taxpayers.

    Life is a constant struggle for the white Rhodesians, who must work nine hours a day, husband and wife, to keep ahead of the Africans, who are constantly learning new skills and moving into new jobs. Food, beer, and cigarettes are cheap, but manufactured items are fantastically expensive.

    As they struggle to save, they see the African renting the best house he’s ever had from the government for a week’s wages; paying no income taxes; doing no compulsory military service; getting free medical care in modern hospitals; paying at the most a few cents for travel, concerts, sports events; packing the house with relatives; putting his wife to work in the garden; growing his own food and tobacco; brewing his own beer; sitting in the sun smoking cigarettes and saving his money to buy a bicycle. And all this with only one of them working!

    This is in contrast to the propaganda picture which shows the bloated whites lounging around the swimming pools enjoying the semi-slavery of the starving blacks who spend all their time shouting “Zimbabwe, we want out country”, and who, of course, are just like white people except for the colour of their skin. Could it be that we have been misinformed?

    Could it be that we have been misinformed by the same people who told us that the Viet Cong were not Communist; then, that they Communist, but not backed by Hanoi; that they were backed by Hanoi, but that Hanoi had no troops in the south; that they had troops in the south, but that if we stopped the bombing they would negotiate; that they were not negotiating, but that if we ever did reach an agreement they would respect it; that if we withdrew our troops the war would end; that the war was continuing, but that Hanoi was not taking over the south; that Hanoi was taking over the south, but that none of the other “dominoes” would follow; that the other “dominoes” were following, but that there would be no bloodbath; that there was a bloodbath, but that it did not really matter very much anyhow. “

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    "Africans work long hours, but they are not generally expected to work hard. It is more common to see one or two at work and four or five asleep. On one occasion Africans were photographed asleep in a park in South Africa. This was shown on television in Britain saying that they had been killed by the police."

    ...snip....
    I knew another African in Johannesburg who got together with his relatives and bought a brand-new van for cash; he used to pick up his employer and charge him a fortune to take him around town. Poor old Billy (the employer) lived in an old busted down dump with damp walls (in Johannesburg, which is notoriously dry), and drove an old clunker. This was the owner of an established piano business left him by his father, and he was convinced his employees lived better than he did.

    Cars are scarce in Rhodesia, where a cheap second hand one costs between one and two thousand Rhodesian dollars, but the percentage of car ownership (cash down) is higher among South African blacks than it is in the Soviet Union."

    "At a dance, one tribe will get up and dance, the other will sit down; half the audience will smile and joke, and other half will not. These are different tribes. If you build a township for one tribe, they will not tolerate members of other tribes living there. They will not tolerate members of other related tribes from different parts of Rhodesia, Zambia, or Mozambique living there. They will not dance together; they will not sit together; they will not talk to each other; they will not intermarry; they will not work together without frequent killing."

    ...snip...
    "“Africa is the most racist country on earth”, an African medical student studying in Spain told me once, “I come from a little country about this big” (indicating a coffee cup), “Spanish Guinea, Equitorial Guinea”. He began naming regions in his country. “The people from the mountains hate the people from the jungles, the people from the jungles hate the people from the plains, the people from the plains hate the people from the coast, the people from the countryside hate the people from the cities, the people in the cities hate everybody… what can you do?”

    Colonial history has been somewhat peculiarly distorted. The British were invited into Zambia to protect the inhabitants from the Matabele, and entered East Africa to destroy the Arab slave trade. Perhaps those vociferous African converts to Mohammedanism would be amused to find themselves in the hands of an Islamic specialist in the castration of Negroes to be sold as harem guards."

    ...snip....

    "Reporters who visit the white-rule states think they know better than the people who live there. At one time this would have been called “prejudice”. Such people know all the facts except the obvious ones, and constantly pretend that if Africans were treated as something which they are not, African would be as democratic as Switzerland. The truth is that Africans will not share power with each other, much less with you, and such theorists are seldom willing to invest their own lives and property in the experiment."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. Malla says:
    @Malla
    Very interesting piece about life in Rhodesia, what it was really like
    https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html
    Requiem for Rhodesia by Carlos Whitlock Porter

    Some snippets:

    "Salisbury is pronounced “Sauls-bry”, not Sal-is-berry. Wages are low and prices are high. It is one of the only two countries in the world which declared their independence from Britain illegally. The other one is having a holiday this year [the United States, celebrating the 200th anniversary of its own UDI].

    Is there apartheid in Rhodesia? No."

    ...snip...

    "You can wait behind Africans in the post office. You can marry an Africa if you get permission. You can drink with Africans, even though normally they will not drink with you; there is a hotel between Stanley and Speke Streets in Salisbury, with a European bar on Stanley and an African bar on Speke. European means white, even if you are Japanese. They are not labelled: if you shoul d happen to enter the African bar, you will simply be told that your bar is around the corner. It is extremely difficult to mistake them, since the African bars are so much noisier. "

    ...snip...

    "The University of Rhodesia at Salisbury is 50% African; in 1973 it was 10%, but due to excrement in the showers and other complaints the opinion became widespread that you had to go to South Africa to get a good education.

    You cannot, however, go to the largest (and one of the best) sports arenas in Rhodesia; that is reserved for non-whites only. "

    ...snip....

    "But with this difference: the average wage for a white man when I was there was 150 Rhodesian dollars a month, then about 300 American dollars; not much. But it costs 150 Rhodesian dollars a month to rent a house. An African could earn 10 dollars a week and rent a house which was in many cases almost identical from the government for 10 dollars a month. You are always hearing about their low wages, but you never hear about what they get for free. There are African, Asian, “Coloured”, and European areas in Salisbury itself which you cannot tell apart without looking at the people -- attractive modern bungalows, some with cars parked outside, with the victims of oppression chatting casually in the front gardens. Whether or not these are a showcase I don’t know, but I can tell you they are resented by Rhodesian taxpayers.

    Life is a constant struggle for the white Rhodesians, who must work nine hours a day, husband and wife, to keep ahead of the Africans, who are constantly learning new skills and moving into new jobs. Food, beer, and cigarettes are cheap, but manufactured items are fantastically expensive.

    As they struggle to save, they see the African renting the best house he’s ever had from the government for a week’s wages; paying no income taxes; doing no compulsory military service; getting free medical care in modern hospitals; paying at the most a few cents for travel, concerts, sports events; packing the house with relatives; putting his wife to work in the garden; growing his own food and tobacco; brewing his own beer; sitting in the sun smoking cigarettes and saving his money to buy a bicycle. And all this with only one of them working!

    This is in contrast to the propaganda picture which shows the bloated whites lounging around the swimming pools enjoying the semi-slavery of the starving blacks who spend all their time shouting “Zimbabwe, we want out country”, and who, of course, are just like white people except for the colour of their skin. Could it be that we have been misinformed?

    Could it be that we have been misinformed by the same people who told us that the Viet Cong were not Communist; then, that they Communist, but not backed by Hanoi; that they were backed by Hanoi, but that Hanoi had no troops in the south; that they had troops in the south, but that if we stopped the bombing they would negotiate; that they were not negotiating, but that if we ever did reach an agreement they would respect it; that if we withdrew our troops the war would end; that the war was continuing, but that Hanoi was not taking over the south; that Hanoi was taking over the south, but that none of the other “dominoes” would follow; that the other “dominoes” were following, but that there would be no bloodbath; that there was a bloodbath, but that it did not really matter very much anyhow. "

    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    “Africans work long hours, but they are not generally expected to work hard. It is more common to see one or two at work and four or five asleep. On one occasion Africans were photographed asleep in a park in South Africa. This was shown on television in Britain saying that they had been killed by the police.”

    …snip….
    I knew another African in Johannesburg who got together with his relatives and bought a brand-new van for cash; he used to pick up his employer and charge him a fortune to take him around town. Poor old Billy (the employer) lived in an old busted down dump with damp walls (in Johannesburg, which is notoriously dry), and drove an old clunker. This was the owner of an established piano business left him by his father, and he was convinced his employees lived better than he did.

    Cars are scarce in Rhodesia, where a cheap second hand one costs between one and two thousand Rhodesian dollars, but the percentage of car ownership (cash down) is higher among South African blacks than it is in the Soviet Union.”

    At a dance, one tribe will get up and dance, the other will sit down; half the audience will smile and joke, and other half will not. These are different tribes. If you build a township for one tribe, they will not tolerate members of other tribes living there. They will not tolerate members of other related tribes from different parts of Rhodesia, Zambia, or Mozambique living there. They will not dance together; they will not sit together; they will not talk to each other; they will not intermarry; they will not work together without frequent killing.

    …snip…
    “Africa is the most racist country on earth”, an African medical student studying in Spain told me once, “I come from a little country about this big” (indicating a coffee cup), “Spanish Guinea, Equitorial Guinea”. He began naming regions in his country. “The people from the mountains hate the people from the jungles, the people from the jungles hate the people from the plains, the people from the plains hate the people from the coast, the people from the countryside hate the people from the cities, the people in the cities hate everybody… what can you do?”

    Colonial history has been somewhat peculiarly distorted. The British were invited into Zambia to protect the inhabitants from the Matabele, and entered East Africa to destroy the Arab slave trade. Perhaps those vociferous African converts to Mohammedanism would be amused to find themselves in the hands of an Islamic specialist in the castration of Negroes to be sold as harem guards.”

    …snip….

    “Reporters who visit the white-rule states think they know better than the people who live there. At one time this would have been called “prejudice”. Such people know all the facts except the obvious ones, and constantly pretend that if Africans were treated as something which they are not, African would be as democratic as Switzerland. The truth is that Africans will not share power with each other, much less with you, and such theorists are seldom willing to invest their own lives and property in the experiment.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html
    Rhodesia has segregated schools. Whites are fee-paying, black schools are free; the whites pay twice, tuition and tax as well. Blacks are educated separately from each other. Why not? Every time you put them together, they kill each other.

    ...snip....

    "All politics in Africa is tribal. Politics, religion, colour, are just new names. Parties are organized along tribal lines. If two tribes are enemies (and they are nearly all enemies), and one fights for the terrorists, the others will either fight for the whites or form their own “terr” groups and fight each other. The three Marxist terrorist armies in Angola reported each other’s troop movements to the Portuguese for years. The Frente Nacional, for example (FNLA) was made up of Bakongo tribesmen from across the Angoloa-Congo (Zaire) border, and was later backed by that country in its civil war against the Movimento Popular (MPLA) and the União Nacional (UNITA). These others had been geographical and tribal enemies of the Bakongos for years.

    Mozambique had two main tribes, the Macua and the Makonde (I am sorry to say I don’t remember which is which). One lived on both sides of the Tanzanian border and made up the main forces of the Frelimo (Frente de Liberacão de Moçambique) terrorists. The others, two million strong, fought for the Portuguese and made up 60% of their army. When “independence” came, they asked Frelimo for elections and were told politely to go to hell. Where is all the talk about stopping Communism by satisfying the “legitimate aspirations” of these people?

    In Rhodesia there are two main terrorist groups following the same pattern.

    It is useless to wait for “education” to de-tribalize the Africans. Tribe is as fundamental as nation, language, religion, culture. The only de-tribalized Africans in the world are the descendents of the New World slaves. Uprooted by force; deliberately mixed; taught an alien language; dumped on the other side of the world for two centuries; outnumbered and educated by whites -- how else could it be done? The New World Negroes are the only ones born speaking a common language (English, Spanish, or Portuguese). They are the only ones who accept the racially mixed as belonging to their own race.

    The African “coloured” (with European, Indian, Malay, Hottentot or Chinese ancestry) belongs to no tribe -- is accepted nowhere -- has no culture of his own, and has a significantly higher rate of social problems than the African. This is one reason why interracial sex was made a criminal offence in South Africa."

    ...snip....

    "Critics of racial separation stress its discriminatory aspects while ignoring the practical reasons for its existence. Port Shepstone, South Africa, had a very high burglary rate. An ordinance was passed making it illegal for blacks to be in town past eight o’clock at night. The burglary rate fell to zero.

    One has to live in these countries to experience the relaxed racial atmosphere which normally prevails in contrast to comparable areas of America. It is common even in “tension-ridden” Johannesburg to chat with an African on a street corner over “whose bus will come first --yours or mine?” Since there are more buses for Africans than for whites, it is usually yourself who waves goodbye and continues to wait"

    ...snip...
    "The system of independent tribal homelands in South Africa is in fact identical to those “black republics” once demanded by American black radicals. The latter are the only areas in the world where blacks can rule free from the conflicting and sometimes violent ambitions of other races and tribes.

    However, even these areas, set up and educated for responsible democratic government by the South African government at great expense, reject democracy and voting at the first available opportunity to do so. In one of these states, the first royal act of King Jonathan, “the world’s longest reigning monarch”, who had ruled his people longer than Queen Victoria had ruled hers, was to abolish Parliament, outlaw the opposition parties, and declare a dictatorship within several days of independence. The first act of independent Ovamboland was to institute public floggings. The world protested and blamed South Africa. South Africa asked them to stop it. They replied that they were independent now, it was a tribal custom, and they could do what they liked.

    Yet African agitators demand the vote in Rhodesia. The agitators have it already, since most of them are educated; they wish the vote so as to get themselves into office to declare a dictatorship of their own.

    A leader of the Rhodesian African nationalists in London has declared that “majority” rule for Rhodesia will involve no pretense at parliamentary government. It will be the usual dictatorship of a self-appointed minority."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. MacNucc11 says:
    @Haxo Angmark
    try as she might, the (((Issacsohn-Mercer))) will never be able to make amends for her own, her family's, and other SA Jews' predominant role in destroying White South Africa.

    But at least she does try and that counts for something.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Malla says:
    @Malla
    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    "Africans work long hours, but they are not generally expected to work hard. It is more common to see one or two at work and four or five asleep. On one occasion Africans were photographed asleep in a park in South Africa. This was shown on television in Britain saying that they had been killed by the police."

    ...snip....
    I knew another African in Johannesburg who got together with his relatives and bought a brand-new van for cash; he used to pick up his employer and charge him a fortune to take him around town. Poor old Billy (the employer) lived in an old busted down dump with damp walls (in Johannesburg, which is notoriously dry), and drove an old clunker. This was the owner of an established piano business left him by his father, and he was convinced his employees lived better than he did.

    Cars are scarce in Rhodesia, where a cheap second hand one costs between one and two thousand Rhodesian dollars, but the percentage of car ownership (cash down) is higher among South African blacks than it is in the Soviet Union."

    "At a dance, one tribe will get up and dance, the other will sit down; half the audience will smile and joke, and other half will not. These are different tribes. If you build a township for one tribe, they will not tolerate members of other tribes living there. They will not tolerate members of other related tribes from different parts of Rhodesia, Zambia, or Mozambique living there. They will not dance together; they will not sit together; they will not talk to each other; they will not intermarry; they will not work together without frequent killing."

    ...snip...
    "“Africa is the most racist country on earth”, an African medical student studying in Spain told me once, “I come from a little country about this big” (indicating a coffee cup), “Spanish Guinea, Equitorial Guinea”. He began naming regions in his country. “The people from the mountains hate the people from the jungles, the people from the jungles hate the people from the plains, the people from the plains hate the people from the coast, the people from the countryside hate the people from the cities, the people in the cities hate everybody… what can you do?”

    Colonial history has been somewhat peculiarly distorted. The British were invited into Zambia to protect the inhabitants from the Matabele, and entered East Africa to destroy the Arab slave trade. Perhaps those vociferous African converts to Mohammedanism would be amused to find themselves in the hands of an Islamic specialist in the castration of Negroes to be sold as harem guards."

    ...snip....

    "Reporters who visit the white-rule states think they know better than the people who live there. At one time this would have been called “prejudice”. Such people know all the facts except the obvious ones, and constantly pretend that if Africans were treated as something which they are not, African would be as democratic as Switzerland. The truth is that Africans will not share power with each other, much less with you, and such theorists are seldom willing to invest their own lives and property in the experiment."

    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html
    Rhodesia has segregated schools. Whites are fee-paying, black schools are free; the whites pay twice, tuition and tax as well. Blacks are educated separately from each other. Why not? Every time you put them together, they kill each other.

    …snip….

    All politics in Africa is tribal. Politics, religion, colour, are just new names. Parties are organized along tribal lines. If two tribes are enemies (and they are nearly all enemies), and one fights for the terrorists, the others will either fight for the whites or form their own “terr” groups and fight each other. The three Marxist terrorist armies in Angola reported each other’s troop movements to the Portuguese for years. The Frente Nacional, for example (FNLA) was made up of Bakongo tribesmen from across the Angoloa-Congo (Zaire) border, and was later backed by that country in its civil war against the Movimento Popular (MPLA) and the União Nacional (UNITA). These others had been geographical and tribal enemies of the Bakongos for years.

    Mozambique had two main tribes, the Macua and the Makonde (I am sorry to say I don’t remember which is which). One lived on both sides of the Tanzanian border and made up the main forces of the Frelimo (Frente de Liberacão de Moçambique) terrorists. The others, two million strong, fought for the Portuguese and made up 60% of their army. When “independence” came, they asked Frelimo for elections and were told politely to go to hell. Where is all the talk about stopping Communism by satisfying the “legitimate aspirations” of these people?

    In Rhodesia there are two main terrorist groups following the same pattern.

    It is useless to wait for “education” to de-tribalize the Africans. Tribe is as fundamental as nation, language, religion, culture. The only de-tribalized Africans in the world are the descendents of the New World slaves. Uprooted by force; deliberately mixed; taught an alien language; dumped on the other side of the world for two centuries; outnumbered and educated by whites — how else could it be done? The New World Negroes are the only ones born speaking a common language (English, Spanish, or Portuguese). They are the only ones who accept the racially mixed as belonging to their own race.

    The African “coloured” (with European, Indian, Malay, Hottentot or Chinese ancestry) belongs to no tribe — is accepted nowhere — has no culture of his own, and has a significantly higher rate of social problems than the African. This is one reason why interracial sex was made a criminal offence in South Africa.

    …snip….

    “Critics of racial separation stress its discriminatory aspects while ignoring the practical reasons for its existence. Port Shepstone, South Africa, had a very high burglary rate. An ordinance was passed making it illegal for blacks to be in town past eight o’clock at night. The burglary rate fell to zero.

    One has to live in these countries to experience the relaxed racial atmosphere which normally prevails in contrast to comparable areas of America. It is common even in “tension-ridden” Johannesburg to chat with an African on a street corner over “whose bus will come first –yours or mine?” Since there are more buses for Africans than for whites, it is usually yourself who waves goodbye and continues to wait

    …snip…
    The system of independent tribal homelands in South Africa is in fact identical to those “black republics” once demanded by American black radicals. The latter are the only areas in the world where blacks can rule free from the conflicting and sometimes violent ambitions of other races and tribes.

    However, even these areas, set up and educated for responsible democratic government by the South African government at great expense, reject democracy and voting at the first available opportunity to do so. In one of these states, the first royal act of King Jonathan, “the world’s longest reigning monarch”, who had ruled his people longer than Queen Victoria had ruled hers, was to abolish Parliament, outlaw the opposition parties, and declare a dictatorship within several days of independence. The first act of independent Ovamboland was to institute public floggings. The world protested and blamed South Africa. South Africa asked them to stop it. They replied that they were independent now, it was a tribal custom, and they could do what they liked.

    Yet African agitators demand the vote in Rhodesia. The agitators have it already, since most of them are educated; they wish the vote so as to get themselves into office to declare a dictatorship of their own.

    A leader of the Rhodesian African nationalists in London has declared that “majority” rule for Rhodesia will involve no pretense at parliamentary government. It will be the usual dictatorship of a self-appointed minority.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    "This is the African who goes about promising his fellows that when the Europeans are expelled, all Africans will drive cars.This is the African who promises UN posts to illiterates. This is the African who goes on speaking tours in Europe and is interviewed by the world’s journalists.

    In Malawi the word for “politician” is “Wa-Benz”. “Wa” is “man”, and “Benz”, of course, is Mercedes-Benz."

    ....snip....
    "Oh really, why not? Oh, well, it seems the Zambian army killed three tourists yesterday and we might get shot down.

    These tourists came from my hotel and were having a picnic on the Rhodesian side in their bathing suits. Two were killed immediately by machine gun fire from the Zambian side and the third, one of the girls, hid behind a rock for half an hour waist deep in the crocodile-infested water until they moved the guns and killed her. The body was never found.

    The Zambians accused them of trying to swim across to their side of the river to blow up a power station. Sure. Through forty-nine million gallons of water a minute rushing through a narrow gorge and the shallows full of crocs.

    These teenagers were American or Canadian, but no note of protest was ever forthcoming to the Zambian government because of it. It was Rhodesia’s fault for creating tension in the area and the Americans should not have been their. (I believe it was in Uganda about 8 years go that two American newspaper reporters were killed and fed to crocs for witnessing the murder of an entire army barracks. The American government demanded an investigation and was perfectly satisfied when the chief suspect was placed in charge.)

    What if the Rhodesian Army had killed Americans having a picnic in Zambia?
    It was in connection with this incident that Ian Smith said,
    “If your skin is black, you will be forgiven anything.”"

    ...snip.....

    "In Africa, European-owned farms, homes, and businesses are tolerated only until the Africans can stand the chaos created by their confiscation. The owners are given 24 hours to leave the country with two suitcases and a few dollars; or they are given cash and expelled, but are prohibited by “exchange control regulations” from taking the cash with them; or they are paid off with government bonds which do not mature for 25 years and can be repudiated by any succeeding government; or they are terrorized by thugs and are told by the police, “If you don’t like it, why don’t you get out of the country!” Then technicians are imported to exploit the resources created or discovered by the former whites. Statistics are falsified by equating the old whites with the new ones. “Despite the horror of the past, there are now 60,000 Belgians (or whatever), spread through the Congo, which once had 90,000, and the nation’s industries, commerce and transport system could not work without them”. Ah, but which ones are they?

    This is the new colonialism. We must help to kill the white Rhodesians so as to butter up the blacks into allowing us to help exploit their property, or the enormous mineral resources which the blacks were never aware of.""

    ...snip.....

    "The terrorists are not freedom fighters. To be in the army in Rhodesia is relatively safe unless you happen to step on a landmine, run into an ambush, or catch up with someone you are chasing. Terrorists stay away from soldiers because soldiers carry guns. The purpose of terrorism is to discourage civilian cooperation with an established government. What is not safe is to be an unarmed African in a terrorist-infested zone. Such a person is likely to see his chief beaten to death, his wife and daughters raped, his sons kidnapped, his ears, lips and nose cut off “pour encourager les autres”. He will be told, “We are coming back. Do not tell the Europeans which way we went. We want so many bags of maize waiting for us when we return.” "

    ...snip....

    "Perhaps you have noticed that countries in which Africans hold all the land must subsist largely off foreign aid. The Frelimo government of Mozambique confiscated the homes and farms of a quarter million Portuguese, and then asked the Rhodesians to feed their starving population! As soon as they got their hands on a couple of trainloads of Rhodesian maize, they declared war on Rhodesia! They were instantly given a healthy dose of foreign aid “assistance” by Britain, whose socialist Prime Minister at that time owned five houses. "

    ...snip...

    "Do you remember the famous “Wiriyamu Massacre”? Where Portuguese soldiers were supposed to have killed 400 (or was it 463?) villagers in a village by that name? No village with that or any similar name in that area was ever proven to exist. Yet the stories of the Wiriyamu massacre and the search for the village of Wiriyamu made headlines all over the world for months. (Strangely enough, until the revolution in Portugal almost to the day.) This story was later found to have fabricated at a conference in Czechoslovakia. About the best thing you can say for newspapers is that they will print anything that makes money. "

    ...snip....
    "Recently an un-elected American official [Henry Kissinger], without the knowledge or consent of the American people, attempted to commit his adopted country to the support of several un-elected Communist dictatorships in their voting-rights war against Rhodesia, a country which that official has never even visited.

    Since Mr. Kissinger is a refugee from Nazi Germany, it is apparent that he feels something less than grateful: Rhodesian had the highest killed-in-action ratio of any Commonwealth country during WWII.

    Rhodesia would accept Mr. Kissinger; Rhodesia would protect his life, his family, his property, his religion; it would allow him full citizenship after two years.

    Can he say the same for Zambia or Mozambique, where religious minorities are tortured, killed, driven into the jungles to starve, where churches are abolished and religion is illegal?

    Neither has there ever been any anti-Semitic legislation in South Africa, where Jews enjoy full political rights.

    South African Jews are among the richest in the world. They are the second greatest single source of Israeli foreign exchange. They have been allowed to do this in a very short time. And they have almost single-handedly financed the movement towards black rule in that country. They are also known to pay or treat their Africans no better than anyone else, as personal experience and strikes at Mr. Oppenheimer’s diamond company can soon attest."
    ...snip...

    "The willingness of South African Jews to repay with contempt the privileges and opportunities of citizenship in one of the richest (and freest) countries of the world, to which most of them fled as penniless refugees, has caused them to be widely hated."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. jim jones says:

    Nobody cares about the Boers. Just like the Russians they are perpetual losers:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Holdon
    If I were to believe all Boers were like those shown in the video, I would say let the african savages have them.
    , @Mark54
    It is very likely that the Dutch Boers are your species superiors.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. MacNucc11 says:
    @Michael Kenny
    What are “colonists in the normal sense” and from what other kind of colonists are they to be distinguished? Also: “Nothing in Afrikaner rule, even at its least enlightened, can match such episodes in American history”. So what? Proving that A is less evil then B doesn’t prove that A isn’t evil. Is Hitler to be considered a “good guy” simply because he murdered fewer people than Stalin?

    I think her point though is that it would be pretty hypocritical of Stalin to be pointing a finger at Hitler.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. Malla says:
    @Malla
    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html
    Rhodesia has segregated schools. Whites are fee-paying, black schools are free; the whites pay twice, tuition and tax as well. Blacks are educated separately from each other. Why not? Every time you put them together, they kill each other.

    ...snip....

    "All politics in Africa is tribal. Politics, religion, colour, are just new names. Parties are organized along tribal lines. If two tribes are enemies (and they are nearly all enemies), and one fights for the terrorists, the others will either fight for the whites or form their own “terr” groups and fight each other. The three Marxist terrorist armies in Angola reported each other’s troop movements to the Portuguese for years. The Frente Nacional, for example (FNLA) was made up of Bakongo tribesmen from across the Angoloa-Congo (Zaire) border, and was later backed by that country in its civil war against the Movimento Popular (MPLA) and the União Nacional (UNITA). These others had been geographical and tribal enemies of the Bakongos for years.

    Mozambique had two main tribes, the Macua and the Makonde (I am sorry to say I don’t remember which is which). One lived on both sides of the Tanzanian border and made up the main forces of the Frelimo (Frente de Liberacão de Moçambique) terrorists. The others, two million strong, fought for the Portuguese and made up 60% of their army. When “independence” came, they asked Frelimo for elections and were told politely to go to hell. Where is all the talk about stopping Communism by satisfying the “legitimate aspirations” of these people?

    In Rhodesia there are two main terrorist groups following the same pattern.

    It is useless to wait for “education” to de-tribalize the Africans. Tribe is as fundamental as nation, language, religion, culture. The only de-tribalized Africans in the world are the descendents of the New World slaves. Uprooted by force; deliberately mixed; taught an alien language; dumped on the other side of the world for two centuries; outnumbered and educated by whites -- how else could it be done? The New World Negroes are the only ones born speaking a common language (English, Spanish, or Portuguese). They are the only ones who accept the racially mixed as belonging to their own race.

    The African “coloured” (with European, Indian, Malay, Hottentot or Chinese ancestry) belongs to no tribe -- is accepted nowhere -- has no culture of his own, and has a significantly higher rate of social problems than the African. This is one reason why interracial sex was made a criminal offence in South Africa."

    ...snip....

    "Critics of racial separation stress its discriminatory aspects while ignoring the practical reasons for its existence. Port Shepstone, South Africa, had a very high burglary rate. An ordinance was passed making it illegal for blacks to be in town past eight o’clock at night. The burglary rate fell to zero.

    One has to live in these countries to experience the relaxed racial atmosphere which normally prevails in contrast to comparable areas of America. It is common even in “tension-ridden” Johannesburg to chat with an African on a street corner over “whose bus will come first --yours or mine?” Since there are more buses for Africans than for whites, it is usually yourself who waves goodbye and continues to wait"

    ...snip...
    "The system of independent tribal homelands in South Africa is in fact identical to those “black republics” once demanded by American black radicals. The latter are the only areas in the world where blacks can rule free from the conflicting and sometimes violent ambitions of other races and tribes.

    However, even these areas, set up and educated for responsible democratic government by the South African government at great expense, reject democracy and voting at the first available opportunity to do so. In one of these states, the first royal act of King Jonathan, “the world’s longest reigning monarch”, who had ruled his people longer than Queen Victoria had ruled hers, was to abolish Parliament, outlaw the opposition parties, and declare a dictatorship within several days of independence. The first act of independent Ovamboland was to institute public floggings. The world protested and blamed South Africa. South Africa asked them to stop it. They replied that they were independent now, it was a tribal custom, and they could do what they liked.

    Yet African agitators demand the vote in Rhodesia. The agitators have it already, since most of them are educated; they wish the vote so as to get themselves into office to declare a dictatorship of their own.

    A leader of the Rhodesian African nationalists in London has declared that “majority” rule for Rhodesia will involve no pretense at parliamentary government. It will be the usual dictatorship of a self-appointed minority."

    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    “This is the African who goes about promising his fellows that when the Europeans are expelled, all Africans will drive cars.This is the African who promises UN posts to illiterates. This is the African who goes on speaking tours in Europe and is interviewed by the world’s journalists.

    In Malawi the word for “politician” is “Wa-Benz”. “Wa” is “man”, and “Benz”, of course, is Mercedes-Benz.”

    ….snip….
    “Oh really, why not? Oh, well, it seems the Zambian army killed three tourists yesterday and we might get shot down.

    These tourists came from my hotel and were having a picnic on the Rhodesian side in their bathing suits. Two were killed immediately by machine gun fire from the Zambian side and the third, one of the girls, hid behind a rock for half an hour waist deep in the crocodile-infested water until they moved the guns and killed her. The body was never found.

    The Zambians accused them of trying to swim across to their side of the river to blow up a power station. Sure. Through forty-nine million gallons of water a minute rushing through a narrow gorge and the shallows full of crocs.

    These teenagers were American or Canadian, but no note of protest was ever forthcoming to the Zambian government because of it. It was Rhodesia’s fault for creating tension in the area and the Americans should not have been their. (I believe it was in Uganda about 8 years go that two American newspaper reporters were killed and fed to crocs for witnessing the murder of an entire army barracks. The American government demanded an investigation and was perfectly satisfied when the chief suspect was placed in charge.)

    What if the Rhodesian Army had killed Americans having a picnic in Zambia?
    It was in connection with this incident that Ian Smith said,
    “If your skin is black, you will be forgiven anything.””

    …snip…..

    “In Africa, European-owned farms, homes, and businesses are tolerated only until the Africans can stand the chaos created by their confiscation. The owners are given 24 hours to leave the country with two suitcases and a few dollars; or they are given cash and expelled, but are prohibited by “exchange control regulations” from taking the cash with them; or they are paid off with government bonds which do not mature for 25 years and can be repudiated by any succeeding government; or they are terrorized by thugs and are told by the police, “If you don’t like it, why don’t you get out of the country!” Then technicians are imported to exploit the resources created or discovered by the former whites. Statistics are falsified by equating the old whites with the new ones. “Despite the horror of the past, there are now 60,000 Belgians (or whatever), spread through the Congo, which once had 90,000, and the nation’s industries, commerce and transport system could not work without them”. Ah, but which ones are they?

    This is the new colonialism. We must help to kill the white Rhodesians so as to butter up the blacks into allowing us to help exploit their property, or the enormous mineral resources which the blacks were never aware of.”

    …snip…..

    “The terrorists are not freedom fighters. To be in the army in Rhodesia is relatively safe unless you happen to step on a landmine, run into an ambush, or catch up with someone you are chasing. Terrorists stay away from soldiers because soldiers carry guns. The purpose of terrorism is to discourage civilian cooperation with an established government. What is not safe is to be an unarmed African in a terrorist-infested zone. Such a person is likely to see his chief beaten to death, his wife and daughters raped, his sons kidnapped, his ears, lips and nose cut off “pour encourager les autres”. He will be told, “We are coming back. Do not tell the Europeans which way we went. We want so many bags of maize waiting for us when we return.” ”

    …snip….

    “Perhaps you have noticed that countries in which Africans hold all the land must subsist largely off foreign aid. The Frelimo government of Mozambique confiscated the homes and farms of a quarter million Portuguese, and then asked the Rhodesians to feed their starving population! As soon as they got their hands on a couple of trainloads of Rhodesian maize, they declared war on Rhodesia! They were instantly given a healthy dose of foreign aid “assistance” by Britain, whose socialist Prime Minister at that time owned five houses. ”

    …snip…

    “Do you remember the famous “Wiriyamu Massacre”? Where Portuguese soldiers were supposed to have killed 400 (or was it 463?) villagers in a village by that name? No village with that or any similar name in that area was ever proven to exist. Yet the stories of the Wiriyamu massacre and the search for the village of Wiriyamu made headlines all over the world for months. (Strangely enough, until the revolution in Portugal almost to the day.) This story was later found to have fabricated at a conference in Czechoslovakia. About the best thing you can say for newspapers is that they will print anything that makes money. ”

    …snip….
    Recently an un-elected American official [Henry Kissinger], without the knowledge or consent of the American people, attempted to commit his adopted country to the support of several un-elected Communist dictatorships in their voting-rights war against Rhodesia, a country which that official has never even visited.

    Since Mr. Kissinger is a refugee from Nazi Germany, it is apparent that he feels something less than grateful: Rhodesian had the highest killed-in-action ratio of any Commonwealth country during WWII.

    Rhodesia would accept Mr. Kissinger; Rhodesia would protect his life, his family, his property, his religion; it would allow him full citizenship after two years.

    Can he say the same for Zambia or Mozambique, where religious minorities are tortured, killed, driven into the jungles to starve, where churches are abolished and religion is illegal?

    Neither has there ever been any anti-Semitic legislation in South Africa, where Jews enjoy full political rights.

    South African Jews are among the richest in the world. They are the second greatest single source of Israeli foreign exchange. They have been allowed to do this in a very short time. And they have almost single-handedly financed the movement towards black rule in that country. They are also known to pay or treat their Africans no better than anyone else, as personal experience and strikes at Mr. Oppenheimer’s diamond company can soon attest.
    …snip…

    The willingness of South African Jews to repay with contempt the privileges and opportunities of citizenship in one of the richest (and freest) countries of the world, to which most of them fled as penniless refugees, has caused them to be widely hated.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    So what did I learn on this thread?

    Black people are horrible to each other, and the Anglos killed a hell of a lot more Boers (white people) than the black people did.

    In other words, "nothing."
    , @Them Guys
    Maybe Poster "Truth" didn't learn anything as he/she stated....However, what I did learn is that I and many others who claim that...Jews and Negroes are The two worst possible Curses upon European White folks, that could ever be a curse. It took me until I was about age of 50 yrs old, when then 15 yrs ago, I first became really Jewised Up and awake fully about Jews. So until that age 50 era, I was a firm believer that, NOTHING and NOBODY Else is, nor could ever be worse than Blacks.

    That all changed once I got Jewised Up, and now I admit I was very wrong about Blacks...I Now know, and without any doubt, that Blacks are slightly less of a massive major Curse upon Whites...If I had to rate it by assigning a number, say a 10 means absolute worst curse on Whites....Then, Jews get rated at, 15+ and Blacks at a lower number rate of just, 14.5 or, 1/2 point below the curse of Jews on Whiteys.

    These great informative reply posts by Malla, have vindicated me in proving me correct as can be. The Two main, major, Massive Curses against European Whites is and has been....Jews#1 and African Savage Blacks at #2...But a Very Close #2.....So close I prefer to avoid Both groups like the major Plague they both have well proven themselves to be.


    If one were to compare America to a Human body, to describe its many problems...It would look like a very sickly and diseased Human Body, with Scab covered deep sores all over its body. And if you were to carefully peel back a scab, any and every scab from the many sores. And peered into the poison puss filling the sore spot, it would be as if, every sore was a negro, and beneath every scab covering, deep within that poison puss, stood a tiny Jew with his snarling evil face staring back up at you. The scab covered sores are the visible problems aka negros, while the real poison aka the puss inside is Jewish. Deeply well hidden and only revealed by peeling away the scab he hides under, and even then one must possess a very keen vision eye sight or use a microscope to view him.


    These postings Malla Posted up also vindicate, a website owner guy named, Bro. Kapner at, realjewnews dot com, when he has said many times that, No major problem such as Americas Black problems, can ever get fixed unless Americans first deal with it's massive, Jew problems. He advises a total boot out same as 109 prior nations have had to do, if America ever wishes to end its problems, and return to when it was a great and swell nation and peoples again. Bro Kapner is correct, and these posts on Africans and Tribal jungle blacks....Well prove it so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. shegetz says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Destroying the most capable group in the world may be the objective, out of revenge, and/or in an effort to control the world.
    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    Weird people, jews.
    The German Sarrazin, former member of the Board of the Bundesbank, the German Fed, outstanding economist, former senator of Berlin, in 2010 wrote a book on how immigration destroys Germany, by importing stupidity.
    Merkel fired him immediately.
    His next book was about the euro disaster.
    Now a book by him on the dangers of Islam has appeared.
    A Dutch jewish journalist, Joshua Livestro, writes that the book should be forbidden.

    Unable to understand writings like this, do not people like this Joshua see that Muslims are not friends of jews ?
    Or is it that the nationalism of men like Sarrazin is seen as the greater evil for jews ?

    https://tpo.nl/2018/08/30/dit-nieuwe-boek-van-thilo-sarrazin-moet-volgens-joshua-livestro-worden-verboden/

    Merkel, as you likely know, was a leading Communist, currently masquerading as a conservative.

    We are in an age of dysgenics and saturation with subversion. I do not know enough about history to draw comparison, but there is very likely method to the madness.

    “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand”

    … attributed to Jesus Christ (Matthew 12:25) but can as readily be seen in this onslaught to splinter nation states with so-called multiculturalism. The age old principle of divide and rule.

    Al-Hijrah enabled by a Jewish elite is a form of warfare on the Western white gentile. As you wonder, the motive may well be the dissolution of the nation state. As much is known in earlier publications of the CFR.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. shegetz says:

    HRC planned to grant amnesty to perhaps 20M illegals. The USA system allows daisy chain family immigration. This would have meant a real total of 100M new immigrants. They would vote for their master. The master would then put to them that the US Constitution is racist and needs to go. But before that would work, citizens would need to be weakened or properly defanged. In the UK, I understand Boris J was in favor of amnesty for the 1M illegals there. Theoretically less chance of civil war as the guns are already removed.

    Personally, if it goes much further, I am wondering what whites will do. There are many of us and there is a very hostile situation for us brewing by our elites for their own reasons.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Theoretically less chance of civil war as the guns are already removed.
     
    The British government supplies guns to minority communities. That is the opinion in many black communities in London. What they mean is that the government supplies guns so that they kill each other. But that makes no sense whatsoever. Why get them in the land, in the first place only to help kill each other. The truth is the outsiders are being brought in since Windrush, post WW2, to create the forces which will be unleashed on the native Britons in the future, they are building up the numbers slowly. They will be the shock troops used in a future Bolshevik takeover. The native Britons are more or less de-armed. There is no 'Right to bear arms' enshrined in a constitution in Britain, Australia (where a false flag event was used to take the guns away), Canada etc... The fact that White Americans have guns, this fact alone have put the brakes on many plans of the globalist elites. The moment they lose their guns, the policies of the elites will fast forward across the world. If a Brazillian in Brazil had some knowledge of how the world really works, he would be praying in his Catholic Church that the Americans can keep their guns, Turks in Ankara would be praying in their mosques, that the Americans have their guns forever, Hindus should be praying in their temples in India that Americans be able to keep their guns, Thais should be praying in their Buddhist Temples that Americans be able to keep their guns.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. twango says:

    @ shegetz

    What was it all for when the Jewish elite sell us out like this today?

    What does that mean? Perhaps you’d like to enlarge on this thesis. It lacks detail.

    Read More
    • Replies: @shegetz
    Rendering the white gentiles minority in their lands, those that fought tyrants, is not something taken lightly.

    Perhaps you'd elaborate on your interest.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Malla says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Destroying the most capable group in the world may be the objective, out of revenge, and/or in an effort to control the world.
    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    Weird people, jews.
    The German Sarrazin, former member of the Board of the Bundesbank, the German Fed, outstanding economist, former senator of Berlin, in 2010 wrote a book on how immigration destroys Germany, by importing stupidity.
    Merkel fired him immediately.
    His next book was about the euro disaster.
    Now a book by him on the dangers of Islam has appeared.
    A Dutch jewish journalist, Joshua Livestro, writes that the book should be forbidden.

    Unable to understand writings like this, do not people like this Joshua see that Muslims are not friends of jews ?
    Or is it that the nationalism of men like Sarrazin is seen as the greater evil for jews ?

    https://tpo.nl/2018/08/30/dit-nieuwe-boek-van-thilo-sarrazin-moet-volgens-joshua-livestro-worden-verboden/

    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    LOL India is already going deep under Jewry as we speak.

    MODI APCO SHIN BET

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2018/03/27/modi-apco-shin-bet/

    A PR firm run by the ‘chosens’ handled Modi’s election campaign. Including the Shining Gujrat b.s.(Gujrat, the state where Modi was chief minister before becoming Prime Minister)

    Also, check out their outreach to (influence in) the Indian media.

    THE KOSHER “EDUCATION” OF INDIAN MEDIA

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/the-kosher-education-of-indian-media/

    Israeli security firms, closely connected to the Israeli Military, provide security to the Indian Parliament !

    UNIT 8200 ,SERAYET MATKAL AND INDIAS CYBER SECURITY

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/unit-8200-serayet-matkal-and-indias-cyber-security/

    Some notable Israeli companies (all closely connected to the Israeli Military) which deserve mention
    NICE Systems, (High Tech recording of the Indian Parliament )
    Akamai Technologies (Election Commission Of India Private mobile Handsets)
    ECI Telecom ,(ECI’s top position in the Indian transmission market, with 25% share of the country’s metro optical network hardware market.)

    Below we observe Hinjew Indians proudly announce how they are preparing to be good Goyim slaves to the Top Dog Jews

    As far as China

    CHINAS “REVOLUTIONARY” JEWS

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/jews-in-china-mao-era/

    CHINESE COMMUNISM? YES BUT IT WAS JEWISH WHEN IT STARTED

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/06/07/chinese-communism-yes-but-it-was-jewish-when-it-started/

    The money looted out of China during the Opium War was itself used to fund Mao and his CCP movement. The elites are deviously brilliant or what?

    Also
    HOW ISRAEL USED WEAPONS AND TECHNOLOGY TO BECOME AN ALLY OF CHINA

    https://www.newsweek.com/china-israel-military-technology-beijing-jerusalem-saul-eisenberg-weapons-607117

    Taking over the non White world will be much easier than you think. Lots of corrupt people, people who will sell anything for a few shekels.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MacNucc11
    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler. Don't bet on China throwing in. Communism is all but done and they are hardcore nationalists. They also have no shame which is in their favor.
    , @Respect
    Godess Kali is going to punish India , for you unfaithfulness
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Che Guava says:
    @Haxo Angmark
    try as she might, the (((Issacsohn-Mercer))) will never be able to make amends for her own, her family's, and other SA Jews' predominant role in destroying White South Africa.

    Since you have already said it, no need for me to post a reminder.

    As for the internment of ‘Japanese-Americans’, from reading Japanese sources, this may have been better if more selective, but there were many spies on Oahu.

    In California, the majority of adults of Japanese descent were members of the ‘Imperial Rule Assistance Association’, by ‘imperial’ they did not mean Napoleon or the George who was king of England at the time.

    Much spying in California, too.

    The Imperial Rule Assistance Association was one of the several pillars of our version of fascism.

    So, though they should have been more differentiated on such bases, internment was totally logical.

    Modern U.S.A. accounts of the injustice are laughable.

    They were not treated inhumanely.

    That is not to say that Pearl Harbour was not a trap set by the U.S.A. prez to make an excuse to godawaah, and very evil he was in that. His true interest was in Europe, not the Pacific and eastern Asia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Is it true that the "chosen of Yahweh" "took over" a large number of the businesses built up by the Japanese during the internment?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Truth says:
    @Malla
    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    "This is the African who goes about promising his fellows that when the Europeans are expelled, all Africans will drive cars.This is the African who promises UN posts to illiterates. This is the African who goes on speaking tours in Europe and is interviewed by the world’s journalists.

    In Malawi the word for “politician” is “Wa-Benz”. “Wa” is “man”, and “Benz”, of course, is Mercedes-Benz."

    ....snip....
    "Oh really, why not? Oh, well, it seems the Zambian army killed three tourists yesterday and we might get shot down.

    These tourists came from my hotel and were having a picnic on the Rhodesian side in their bathing suits. Two were killed immediately by machine gun fire from the Zambian side and the third, one of the girls, hid behind a rock for half an hour waist deep in the crocodile-infested water until they moved the guns and killed her. The body was never found.

    The Zambians accused them of trying to swim across to their side of the river to blow up a power station. Sure. Through forty-nine million gallons of water a minute rushing through a narrow gorge and the shallows full of crocs.

    These teenagers were American or Canadian, but no note of protest was ever forthcoming to the Zambian government because of it. It was Rhodesia’s fault for creating tension in the area and the Americans should not have been their. (I believe it was in Uganda about 8 years go that two American newspaper reporters were killed and fed to crocs for witnessing the murder of an entire army barracks. The American government demanded an investigation and was perfectly satisfied when the chief suspect was placed in charge.)

    What if the Rhodesian Army had killed Americans having a picnic in Zambia?
    It was in connection with this incident that Ian Smith said,
    “If your skin is black, you will be forgiven anything.”"

    ...snip.....

    "In Africa, European-owned farms, homes, and businesses are tolerated only until the Africans can stand the chaos created by their confiscation. The owners are given 24 hours to leave the country with two suitcases and a few dollars; or they are given cash and expelled, but are prohibited by “exchange control regulations” from taking the cash with them; or they are paid off with government bonds which do not mature for 25 years and can be repudiated by any succeeding government; or they are terrorized by thugs and are told by the police, “If you don’t like it, why don’t you get out of the country!” Then technicians are imported to exploit the resources created or discovered by the former whites. Statistics are falsified by equating the old whites with the new ones. “Despite the horror of the past, there are now 60,000 Belgians (or whatever), spread through the Congo, which once had 90,000, and the nation’s industries, commerce and transport system could not work without them”. Ah, but which ones are they?

    This is the new colonialism. We must help to kill the white Rhodesians so as to butter up the blacks into allowing us to help exploit their property, or the enormous mineral resources which the blacks were never aware of.""

    ...snip.....

    "The terrorists are not freedom fighters. To be in the army in Rhodesia is relatively safe unless you happen to step on a landmine, run into an ambush, or catch up with someone you are chasing. Terrorists stay away from soldiers because soldiers carry guns. The purpose of terrorism is to discourage civilian cooperation with an established government. What is not safe is to be an unarmed African in a terrorist-infested zone. Such a person is likely to see his chief beaten to death, his wife and daughters raped, his sons kidnapped, his ears, lips and nose cut off “pour encourager les autres”. He will be told, “We are coming back. Do not tell the Europeans which way we went. We want so many bags of maize waiting for us when we return.” "

    ...snip....

    "Perhaps you have noticed that countries in which Africans hold all the land must subsist largely off foreign aid. The Frelimo government of Mozambique confiscated the homes and farms of a quarter million Portuguese, and then asked the Rhodesians to feed their starving population! As soon as they got their hands on a couple of trainloads of Rhodesian maize, they declared war on Rhodesia! They were instantly given a healthy dose of foreign aid “assistance” by Britain, whose socialist Prime Minister at that time owned five houses. "

    ...snip...

    "Do you remember the famous “Wiriyamu Massacre”? Where Portuguese soldiers were supposed to have killed 400 (or was it 463?) villagers in a village by that name? No village with that or any similar name in that area was ever proven to exist. Yet the stories of the Wiriyamu massacre and the search for the village of Wiriyamu made headlines all over the world for months. (Strangely enough, until the revolution in Portugal almost to the day.) This story was later found to have fabricated at a conference in Czechoslovakia. About the best thing you can say for newspapers is that they will print anything that makes money. "

    ...snip....
    "Recently an un-elected American official [Henry Kissinger], without the knowledge or consent of the American people, attempted to commit his adopted country to the support of several un-elected Communist dictatorships in their voting-rights war against Rhodesia, a country which that official has never even visited.

    Since Mr. Kissinger is a refugee from Nazi Germany, it is apparent that he feels something less than grateful: Rhodesian had the highest killed-in-action ratio of any Commonwealth country during WWII.

    Rhodesia would accept Mr. Kissinger; Rhodesia would protect his life, his family, his property, his religion; it would allow him full citizenship after two years.

    Can he say the same for Zambia or Mozambique, where religious minorities are tortured, killed, driven into the jungles to starve, where churches are abolished and religion is illegal?

    Neither has there ever been any anti-Semitic legislation in South Africa, where Jews enjoy full political rights.

    South African Jews are among the richest in the world. They are the second greatest single source of Israeli foreign exchange. They have been allowed to do this in a very short time. And they have almost single-handedly financed the movement towards black rule in that country. They are also known to pay or treat their Africans no better than anyone else, as personal experience and strikes at Mr. Oppenheimer’s diamond company can soon attest."
    ...snip...

    "The willingness of South African Jews to repay with contempt the privileges and opportunities of citizenship in one of the richest (and freest) countries of the world, to which most of them fled as penniless refugees, has caused them to be widely hated."

    So what did I learn on this thread?

    Black people are horrible to each other, and the Anglos killed a hell of a lot more Boers (white people) than the black people did.

    In other words, “nothing.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Black people are horrible to each other, and the Anglos killed a hell of a lot more Boers (white people) than the black people did.
     
    Human nature.

    In other words, “nothing.”
     
    My apologies for your time wasted.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. shegetz says:
    @twango
    @ shegetz

    What was it all for when the Jewish elite sell us out like this today?
     
    What does that mean? Perhaps you'd like to enlarge on this thesis. It lacks detail.

    Rendering the white gentiles minority in their lands, those that fought tyrants, is not something taken lightly.

    Perhaps you’d elaborate on your interest.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Erebus says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Destroying the most capable group in the world may be the objective, out of revenge, and/or in an effort to control the world.
    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    Weird people, jews.
    The German Sarrazin, former member of the Board of the Bundesbank, the German Fed, outstanding economist, former senator of Berlin, in 2010 wrote a book on how immigration destroys Germany, by importing stupidity.
    Merkel fired him immediately.
    His next book was about the euro disaster.
    Now a book by him on the dangers of Islam has appeared.
    A Dutch jewish journalist, Joshua Livestro, writes that the book should be forbidden.

    Unable to understand writings like this, do not people like this Joshua see that Muslims are not friends of jews ?
    Or is it that the nationalism of men like Sarrazin is seen as the greater evil for jews ?

    https://tpo.nl/2018/08/30/dit-nieuwe-boek-van-thilo-sarrazin-moet-volgens-joshua-livestro-worden-verboden/

    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    For all but (arguably) the first two, it’s very easy to see. They’ll accept it because they’ll be unaware of it. Europeans and N. Americans accepted it without a murmur because they had little idea of it, and had much to distract them. Why wouldn’t the rest?
    Russia & China are outliers. They’re blessed by the fact that their current elites are hyper-sensitive to how power operates in the world for the simple reason that they aspire to take the heart of it. They know who has to be taken down a notch, and they know from whence power springs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. shegetz says:

    A curiosity. I just plugged in Hijrah into Jewish cuckcuckgo and guess what? NOTHING about the reality of the term. It is apparently a mosque in north Virginia, not a religious imperative to invade Dar Al-Harb, fellow dhimmis. Fancy that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. @jilles dykstra
    I wonder what truth is being revealed.
    The Boers, mainly of Dutch and German origin, drove the original peoples from their lands, in wars.
    These wars were extremely one sided, repeater rifles against javelins etc.
    How many casualties among the javelin people, never saw any estimate.
    With the end of racism, and democracy, the Boers etc became a minority.
    A relative of mine lived in S Africa from 1955 until 1985, then the first bombs exploded, and, as he had the Dutch pension age, 65, he and his wife left for the Netherlands, though he loved S Africa.
    He died not so long ago, visited S Africa until high age, and told me about deteriorating conditions, the country in general, but especially how whites were treated.
    He said 'they all (whites) want to leave, but most of them cannot', financially.
    There can be long discussions about the moral side of the conflict between black and white, who owns the land, etc., what happens is clear to me: a rich country going the Zimbabwe way.
    I never saw my relative as a racist, yet he was of the opinion that 'the blacks are completely useless'.
    In my opinion just a statement of fact.

    The original black inhabitants of SA died out from disease after contact with the Boers. Other blacks came south into SA only because the Boers offered them jobs in farming, etc. The blacks there now are not the original inhabitants of SA and have now stolen the land from the Boers and Brits.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    The original black inhabitants of SA died out from disease after contact with the Boers. Other blacks came south into SA only because the Boers offered them jobs in farming, etc. The blacks there now are not the original inhabitants of SA and have now stolen the land from the Boers and Brits.
     
    Fake history. A little research will disabuse you of this stupidity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. MacNucc11 says:
    @Malla

    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.
     
    LOL India is already going deep under Jewry as we speak.

    MODI APCO SHIN BET

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2018/03/27/modi-apco-shin-bet/

    A PR firm run by the ‘chosens’ handled Modi’s election campaign. Including the Shining Gujrat b.s.(Gujrat, the state where Modi was chief minister before becoming Prime Minister)

    Also, check out their outreach to (influence in) the Indian media.

    THE KOSHER “EDUCATION” OF INDIAN MEDIA

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/the-kosher-education-of-indian-media/

    Israeli security firms, closely connected to the Israeli Military, provide security to the Indian Parliament !

    UNIT 8200 ,SERAYET MATKAL AND INDIAS CYBER SECURITY

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/unit-8200-serayet-matkal-and-indias-cyber-security/

    Some notable Israeli companies (all closely connected to the Israeli Military) which deserve mention
    NICE Systems, (High Tech recording of the Indian Parliament )
    Akamai Technologies (Election Commission Of India Private mobile Handsets)
    ECI Telecom ,(ECI’s top position in the Indian transmission market, with 25% share of the country’s metro optical network hardware market.)

    Below we observe Hinjew Indians proudly announce how they are preparing to be good Goyim slaves to the Top Dog Jews

    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/mmnmmm.png
    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/admdsa.png
    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/randa-2.png

    As far as China

    CHINAS “REVOLUTIONARY” JEWS

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/jews-in-china-mao-era/

    CHINESE COMMUNISM? YES BUT IT WAS JEWISH WHEN IT STARTED

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/06/07/chinese-communism-yes-but-it-was-jewish-when-it-started/

    The money looted out of China during the Opium War was itself used to fund Mao and his CCP movement. The elites are deviously brilliant or what?

    Also
    HOW ISRAEL USED WEAPONS AND TECHNOLOGY TO BECOME AN ALLY OF CHINA

    https://www.newsweek.com/china-israel-military-technology-beijing-jerusalem-saul-eisenberg-weapons-607117

    Taking over the non White world will be much easier than you think. Lots of corrupt people, people who will sell anything for a few shekels.

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler. Don’t bet on China throwing in. Communism is all but done and they are hardcore nationalists. They also have no shame which is in their favor.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler.
     
    That may be true but ironically it is also a country where there is a lot of devotion and love for Jews. Hinjews...er... Hindus will compete with Christian Zionists in 'kissing Jew butt' contests.
    , @Bliss

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler.
     
    This self-loathing Indian Malla must be the sales agent in India for Mein Kampf.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer, the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”. He has dedicated his life to bashing the “subhuman” race he was unfortunately born into.

    What a pathetic creature...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Malla
    Black Population in South Africa Has Increased by 920% in 100 Years

    TNO STAFF — MAY 30, 2013

    The black population in South Africa has increased by an astonishing 920 percent in just 100 years, mainly thanks to white farmers and western infrastructure, a new report from the Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU) has revealed.

    The report, titled “Whose Land is it Anyway,” was brought out to counter the build-up to the centenary of the 1913 Land Act in South Africa, which black supremacists and their supporters quite falsely claim was a “cornerstone of apartheid” and “land theft” from the African people.

    ARP1576224

    The TAU is the oldest agricultural union in South Africa and has been in existence since 1897.

    “Common currency has it that whites ‘stole’ land from indigenous blacks and that this theft was legally ratified by the 1913 and 1936 Land Acts which divided up the land and codified these divisions,” the TAU report said.

    In reality, “whites who came to South Africa in 1652 and thereafter found a land devoid of basic development and infrastructure, sparsely populated by meandering tribes who had no written word and whose way of life was the absolute antithesis of Western mores.

    “It is now acknowledged that the Khoi-San groups, and their sub-groups, are the indigenous peoples of South Africa.

    “Whites and black African groups arrived in various parts of the country around the same time. They met at the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and wars followed.”

    The TAU also pointed out that prior to the arrival of the whites, the black population—which as pointed out above, arrived simultaneously with the European settlers and therefore have no more claim to the country than the whites—did not have any concept of land ownership or even writing.

    “Man in his primitive state did not know the concept of ‘land tenure,’” the report continued.

    “When hunter/gatherer groups formed, the first land tenure (if it can be called that) was by nature communal. Before the arrival of the European in South Africa with his tradition of individual land ownership, communal tenure in Africa was the norm.

    “The territory inhabited and/or cultivated by a particular ethnic group was owned and/or utilized by the tribe in the name of their king or chief. Because there was no written word among these peoples, Christian missionaries took it upon themselves to learn and then write and codify the languages of the black people to whom they were ministering. They then taught these people to read and write their own language.”

    “It is known that a great migration of black people took place from the Great Lakes region southwards, eventually reaching Southern Africa. Numerous reports exist as to which tribe went where. But these reports are not the historical property of the black peoples.

    “Thus their claims to land in South Africa have no empirical foundation. They are based on oral history and folklore, and what was observed by early European travelers and missionaries, by the British colonial presence in the country, by Boer trekkers and administrators.

    “If your history is written by others, with what can you contest this history? However, the early settled areas of the black people were later generally recognized as their core areas.”


    “From the very beginning of settlement, black and white were segregated. South African history is replete with clashes over land ‘ownership’. There were no title deeds, no courts to decide who owned what.

    “Proclamations and annexations were followed by wars, clashes, agreements and disagreements, theft of livestock, sloppy boundaries and arguments over the measurement and surveying of land; borders were drawn and re-drawn; people moved all over the place and a completely differing approach to farming by both groups existed.

    “In the black community, land was communal and the product of their agricultural activities was mainly for their own consumption. This was subsistence farming, and it persists in today’s South Africa.

    “ Soon after the formation of the Union of South Africa in 1910, it was deemed imperative to settle the land question once and for all. The government (still under the British Crown) believed that if land could not be partitioned and allocated within the ambit of a Western title deed system, the very future of South Africa would be put at risk.

    “The most immediate problem was food production for a burgeoning population. (It was obvious to the British then that blacks could not produce food for surplus, and to this day this is still the case).

    “The core reason for the 1913 Land Act’s passing was the security of the whites, and particularly the farmers, to give them the necessary security of tenure on their farms to produce the food for what was still a country under the British flag, controlled essentially from London. Gold and diamonds had been discovered, and Britain was not going to give up this new jewel in the Crown.

    “Antagonists of the 1913 Act and indeed the 1936 Act should look to Britain for redress. These pieces of legislation were not apartheid Acts—they were devised in South Africa under a government controlled by Britain.

    “The current population of South Africa according to Stats SA is 52,98 million. As quoted by the SA Institute of Race Relations’ Yearbook 2012, the population of the country in 1911 was blacks: 4,018 million, whites: 1,276 million; coloreds: 525,466 and Indians: 152,094.

    “The percentages were white: 21% and black: 67%. One hundred years later, the percentage population increase of blacks was 920%.

    “But land in South Africa is a political tool. It is wielded without thought for the morrow. It is proffered within the context of a cultural more that has no place in today’s practical world. The division of land under the 1913 Land Act is a blunt weapon used to garner votes by the present SA government to seduce naïve and mostly uneducated followers who cannot feed themselves but who are asked to look upon those who can feed them as ogres who stole their land.”

    Whites and black African groups arrived in various parts of the country around the same time. They met at the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and wars followed.

    Whites first settled the Western Cape, where a few Khoikhoi/Hottentots lived. When whites expanded to other other areas, they encountered Bantu people, who had displaced the San and Khoikhoi centuries earlier.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Yes true.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Okechukwu says:

    I see Malla is spamming another thread with his unadulterated nonsense.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. Okechukwu says:
    @George F. Held
    The original black inhabitants of SA died out from disease after contact with the Boers. Other blacks came south into SA only because the Boers offered them jobs in farming, etc. The blacks there now are not the original inhabitants of SA and have now stolen the land from the Boers and Brits.

    The original black inhabitants of SA died out from disease after contact with the Boers. Other blacks came south into SA only because the Boers offered them jobs in farming, etc. The blacks there now are not the original inhabitants of SA and have now stolen the land from the Boers and Brits.

    Fake history. A little research will disabuse you of this stupidity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Malla says:
    @Truth
    So what did I learn on this thread?

    Black people are horrible to each other, and the Anglos killed a hell of a lot more Boers (white people) than the black people did.

    In other words, "nothing."

    Black people are horrible to each other, and the Anglos killed a hell of a lot more Boers (white people) than the black people did.

    Human nature.

    In other words, “nothing.”

    My apologies for your time wasted.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Malla says:
    @MacNucc11
    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler. Don't bet on China throwing in. Communism is all but done and they are hardcore nationalists. They also have no shame which is in their favor.

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler.

    That may be true but ironically it is also a country where there is a lot of devotion and love for Jews. Hinjews…er… Hindus will compete with Christian Zionists in ‘kissing Jew butt’ contests.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Malla says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Whites and black African groups arrived in various parts of the country around the same time. They met at the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and wars followed.
     
    Whites first settled the Western Cape, where a few Khoikhoi/Hottentots lived. When whites expanded to other other areas, they encountered Bantu people, who had displaced the San and Khoikhoi centuries earlier.

    Yes true.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Malla says:
    @Che Guava
    Since you have already said it, no need for me to post a reminder.

    As for the internment of 'Japanese-Americans', from reading Japanese sources, this may have been better if more selective, but there were many spies on Oahu.

    In California, the majority of adults of Japanese descent were members of the 'Imperial Rule Assistance Association', by 'imperial' they did not mean Napoleon or the George who was king of England at the time.

    Much spying in California, too.

    The Imperial Rule Assistance Association was one of the several pillars of our version of fascism.

    So, though they should have been more differentiated on such bases, internment was totally logical.

    Modern U.S.A. accounts of the injustice are laughable.

    They were not treated inhumanely.

    That is not to say that Pearl Harbour was not a trap set by the U.S.A. prez to make an excuse to godawaah, and very evil he was in that. His true interest was in Europe, not the Pacific and eastern Asia.

    Is it true that the “chosen of Yahweh” “took over” a large number of the businesses built up by the Japanese during the internment?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    I do nnt kmow about that, but if true, it would not surprise me at all.
    Just typical
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Malla
    Black Population in South Africa Has Increased by 920% in 100 Years

    TNO STAFF — MAY 30, 2013

    The black population in South Africa has increased by an astonishing 920 percent in just 100 years, mainly thanks to white farmers and western infrastructure, a new report from the Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU) has revealed.

    The report, titled “Whose Land is it Anyway,” was brought out to counter the build-up to the centenary of the 1913 Land Act in South Africa, which black supremacists and their supporters quite falsely claim was a “cornerstone of apartheid” and “land theft” from the African people.

    ARP1576224

    The TAU is the oldest agricultural union in South Africa and has been in existence since 1897.

    “Common currency has it that whites ‘stole’ land from indigenous blacks and that this theft was legally ratified by the 1913 and 1936 Land Acts which divided up the land and codified these divisions,” the TAU report said.

    In reality, “whites who came to South Africa in 1652 and thereafter found a land devoid of basic development and infrastructure, sparsely populated by meandering tribes who had no written word and whose way of life was the absolute antithesis of Western mores.

    “It is now acknowledged that the Khoi-San groups, and their sub-groups, are the indigenous peoples of South Africa.

    “Whites and black African groups arrived in various parts of the country around the same time. They met at the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and wars followed.”

    The TAU also pointed out that prior to the arrival of the whites, the black population—which as pointed out above, arrived simultaneously with the European settlers and therefore have no more claim to the country than the whites—did not have any concept of land ownership or even writing.

    “Man in his primitive state did not know the concept of ‘land tenure,’” the report continued.

    “When hunter/gatherer groups formed, the first land tenure (if it can be called that) was by nature communal. Before the arrival of the European in South Africa with his tradition of individual land ownership, communal tenure in Africa was the norm.

    “The territory inhabited and/or cultivated by a particular ethnic group was owned and/or utilized by the tribe in the name of their king or chief. Because there was no written word among these peoples, Christian missionaries took it upon themselves to learn and then write and codify the languages of the black people to whom they were ministering. They then taught these people to read and write their own language.”

    “It is known that a great migration of black people took place from the Great Lakes region southwards, eventually reaching Southern Africa. Numerous reports exist as to which tribe went where. But these reports are not the historical property of the black peoples.

    “Thus their claims to land in South Africa have no empirical foundation. They are based on oral history and folklore, and what was observed by early European travelers and missionaries, by the British colonial presence in the country, by Boer trekkers and administrators.

    “If your history is written by others, with what can you contest this history? However, the early settled areas of the black people were later generally recognized as their core areas.”


    “From the very beginning of settlement, black and white were segregated. South African history is replete with clashes over land ‘ownership’. There were no title deeds, no courts to decide who owned what.

    “Proclamations and annexations were followed by wars, clashes, agreements and disagreements, theft of livestock, sloppy boundaries and arguments over the measurement and surveying of land; borders were drawn and re-drawn; people moved all over the place and a completely differing approach to farming by both groups existed.

    “In the black community, land was communal and the product of their agricultural activities was mainly for their own consumption. This was subsistence farming, and it persists in today’s South Africa.

    “ Soon after the formation of the Union of South Africa in 1910, it was deemed imperative to settle the land question once and for all. The government (still under the British Crown) believed that if land could not be partitioned and allocated within the ambit of a Western title deed system, the very future of South Africa would be put at risk.

    “The most immediate problem was food production for a burgeoning population. (It was obvious to the British then that blacks could not produce food for surplus, and to this day this is still the case).

    “The core reason for the 1913 Land Act’s passing was the security of the whites, and particularly the farmers, to give them the necessary security of tenure on their farms to produce the food for what was still a country under the British flag, controlled essentially from London. Gold and diamonds had been discovered, and Britain was not going to give up this new jewel in the Crown.

    “Antagonists of the 1913 Act and indeed the 1936 Act should look to Britain for redress. These pieces of legislation were not apartheid Acts—they were devised in South Africa under a government controlled by Britain.

    “The current population of South Africa according to Stats SA is 52,98 million. As quoted by the SA Institute of Race Relations’ Yearbook 2012, the population of the country in 1911 was blacks: 4,018 million, whites: 1,276 million; coloreds: 525,466 and Indians: 152,094.

    “The percentages were white: 21% and black: 67%. One hundred years later, the percentage population increase of blacks was 920%.

    “But land in South Africa is a political tool. It is wielded without thought for the morrow. It is proffered within the context of a cultural more that has no place in today’s practical world. The division of land under the 1913 Land Act is a blunt weapon used to garner votes by the present SA government to seduce naïve and mostly uneducated followers who cannot feed themselves but who are asked to look upon those who can feed them as ogres who stole their land.”

    They then taught these people to read and write their own language.

    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics. We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    The East Asians and Mesopotamians with their primitive pictographic languages at least managed to innovate an impressive amount given the limitations. Africans never innovated even the most basic of concepts like the wheel. Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization.
     
    Well I agree with you that the best solution for the race problem would be complete separation. The failure is of the White race which went about trying to spread Western civilization everywhere. Big mistake. There are genetic racial differences on AVERAGE in outlook towards everything. Our brains are wired differently it seems. Not completely differently, we have a lot of similarities as humans but there are differences enough to make multi racial/ multi cultural societies failures in the long run. This whole project was bound to fail. That is why the White Africans either should leave or get their own republics. There is no other option.

    However I have come across black people who are good, well mannered, kind and intelligent, mostly educated Africans and a few black Americans too. I have come across honest good Jewish people too. Maybe they are some kind of minority in their group. Indeed some of the blacks I knew were better than most Indians I know. There are variations in every race.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwPlY6EYnJ8
    Check out the Congolese guy at 28:01 to 33:38

    I have an Indian friend who does some business in Africa something to do with the sugarcane industry. He told me he would rather do business with blacks and whites than Indians because Indians never pay for service rendered. White customers in general were the best, the black business customer will eventually pay up but Indians just do not pay. He avoids Indian customers like hell even though he is Indian himself. But there are honest Indians too. Just that the percentage out of a population is smaller.

    So I do not think it is possible to judge an individual as all individuals do not behave as the AVERAGE of their groups. But we make stereotypes to protect ourselves as it is not possible to know the nature of each and every stranger, we do not have time and have to make quick decisions.

    But I still agree that complete separation of the races is the best option. Whites and blacks should separate out and leave and live in peace.

    , @Okechukwu

    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics.
     
    Can you identify any ancient manuscripts from North, West or Central Europe? Any papyri? Stone tablets? Symbolic pictography? Anything? Europeans were some of the last adopters of writing. And it was imposed on them, they couldn't figure it out on their own.

    On the other hand:

    Ancient African Writing

    http://www.taneter.org/writing.html

    On math.

    Ancient African Mathematics

    http://www.taneter.org/math.html

    13 Interesting Facts About Math in Ancient Africa

    https://blog.mindresearch.org/blog/math-facts-ancient-africa

    Mathematics in (central) Africa before colonization

    http://etopia.sintlucas.be/3.14/Ishango_meeting/Mathematics_Africa.pdf

    Your lies are too easy to refute, bruh.
    , @Anonymous

    We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.
     
    Current research on Neandertals suggests they were more intelligent and less violent than the species that gradually absorbed them.

    Just something to keep in mind, along with the general concept of not blatting your fool mouth in loud and resplendent ignorance.
    , @TheJester

    Allowing them [Bantu Africans] in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.
     
    Well said, Stan d Mute.

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia. (Affirmative action jobs must pay well. I talking about a social phenomenon in some of the richest counties in the United States.) These marriages make sense in a way. Given the alternative, I can imagine what transpires over morning coffee between a White feminist who hates White men and one of the White men she hates.

    On the other hand, White feminists who hate White men and Black power males who hate White men have a lot in common. Their back-and-forth over morning coffee must provide both of them a cathartic effect as they vent their anger against a common enemy.

    However, I'm wondering if many of these White feminists will become disillusioned when Black male domestic violence, as happened to Rachel Dolezal, starts to rear its ugly head. There is also the question of whether shared anger is a viable basis for a stable marriage.

    Although somewhat dated, a 2000 NYT article reports that Blacks commit domestic violence at almost triple the rate of Whites.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/18/us/study-shows-a-racial-divide-in-domestic-violence-cases.html

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. APilgrim says:

    If memory serves, the USA abortion death count since Roe-v-Wade is ~65M.

    Dead Black Babies are statistically the relative highest percentage, & close to the top numerically.

    When will the slaughter stop, and the DENIALS begin?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    If memory serves, the USA abortion death count since Roe-v-Wade is ~65M.
     
    Good, but not good enough.

    Dead Black Babies are statistically the relative highest percentage, & close to the top numerically.
     
    Better, but still not good enough.

    ZPG, and screw you dumbass religionists.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Did you see the recent clip of May “dancing” with black school children in SA? It’s a pretty damning statement on how low the British political class has sunk that this loathsome bitch attained a prominent position. (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    What’s funny about the dancing video is that the British press is completely obsessed with it, while ignoring her damaging and lethal comments about land confiscation. In other words, the Brits love to chatter about optics and social faux pas, proving yet again that they’re highly overrated as a so-called thinking peoples.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    At this stage Britain is richly deserving of their fate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Malla says:
    @shegetz
    HRC planned to grant amnesty to perhaps 20M illegals. The USA system allows daisy chain family immigration. This would have meant a real total of 100M new immigrants. They would vote for their master. The master would then put to them that the US Constitution is racist and needs to go. But before that would work, citizens would need to be weakened or properly defanged. In the UK, I understand Boris J was in favor of amnesty for the 1M illegals there. Theoretically less chance of civil war as the guns are already removed.

    Personally, if it goes much further, I am wondering what whites will do. There are many of us and there is a very hostile situation for us brewing by our elites for their own reasons.

    Theoretically less chance of civil war as the guns are already removed.

    The British government supplies guns to minority communities. That is the opinion in many black communities in London. What they mean is that the government supplies guns so that they kill each other. But that makes no sense whatsoever. Why get them in the land, in the first place only to help kill each other. The truth is the outsiders are being brought in since Windrush, post WW2, to create the forces which will be unleashed on the native Britons in the future, they are building up the numbers slowly. They will be the shock troops used in a future Bolshevik takeover. The native Britons are more or less de-armed. There is no ‘Right to bear arms’ enshrined in a constitution in Britain, Australia (where a false flag event was used to take the guns away), Canada etc… The fact that White Americans have guns, this fact alone have put the brakes on many plans of the globalist elites. The moment they lose their guns, the policies of the elites will fast forward across the world. If a Brazillian in Brazil had some knowledge of how the world really works, he would be praying in his Catholic Church that the Americans can keep their guns, Turks in Ankara would be praying in their mosques, that the Americans have their guns forever, Hindus should be praying in their temples in India that Americans be able to keep their guns, Thais should be praying in their Buddhist Temples that Americans be able to keep their guns.

    Read More
    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    The old (17th century) England and Wales Bill of Rights, and its Scottish equivalent, did include the right of citizens to bear arms.

    Much of the U.S. constitution and Bill of Rights is based on those documents (probably more the former (England and Wales)), so they are worth reading if you have an interest in such things. I do.

    However, the Brit. legal-political classes decided to pretend that those laws did not exist at some stage, I think, but not sure, early in the last century, maybe earlier. They have never been rescinded.

    The sequence of how that happened would make a really good topic for a doctoral thesis in history.

    From my reading, such deep thought is not well-regarded in the west of now, Intersectional Thoughts on the Founders, On the Non-Intersectionality of the Founders, or some other such rubbish would be more likely to be a hit.

    There must be some places that are not like that?

    Also, looking at both the England-Wales and Scotland bills, and their connection to the founding principles of the U.S.A., in depth, at least worth a master's thesis.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Don't spoil the credit you get for good stuff by talking out of your hat on matters about which you are totally misinformed. There was no false flag incident involved in the further restrictions on gun ownership in Australia and the gun buybacks enacted about 21 years ago after mentally disturbed former soldier Julian Knight in inner Melbourne's Hoddle Street shot a few people and the mentally retarded loner Martin Bryant shot a lot of people at Port Arthur, Tasmania. Please try not to be one of those strange commenters infesting UR threads who have absolutely no judgment or discrimination about the websites they trust and no instinct for suspecting the clichéd dodgy story.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. republic says:
    @Bragadocious
    I don't know why Ilana brings up American dirty laundry. They weren't the ones killing Boers; the Brits were. And when the Brits could no longer kill the Boers they demonized them to the point where it was considered acceptable for black South Africans to kill them. And now Theresa May has endorsed land confiscation "as long as it's legal." So nothing's changed for Britain.

    Not a very good article. This writer’s race caused a lot of the problems the Boers today are facing in South Africa.

    Before he died in 2002, the late great white nationalist, Dr. Pierce gave a lot of speeches which are still available today on the real reasons for why the last white government gave up its rule in SA.

    The lesson of South Africa

    said among other things that the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers, also the jews were pumping spiritual poison into the White population urging them to surrender rather than fight. But Pierce said it was the betrayal by the Boer establishment- the Boer politicians and church leaders and big businessmen which sealed the fate of South Africa

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stan d Mute

    the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers
     
    Of course it did. Look how the Catholic Church has betrayed white Catholics, the evangelical churches have betrayed white evangelicals, etc, ad nauseum.

    For all the awareness of Jewish manipulation around here, it’s absolutely astounding how stupid Christians are on the topic of the grandest manipulation foisted on their ancestors and which their ancestors foisted upon them. Too stupid to realize Tinkerbelle isn’t real, that it’s a retarded fable of desert dwelling morons, they suck it up like soy milkshakes. They have Faith that they are exactly the same as Africans (maybe they are on a cognitive level) because some desert rat’s desiccated scrolls tell them they’re all created in Tinkerbelle’s image.

    The stupidity of adhering to Neolithic sand myths in the Space Age is equalled only by the hypocrisy of blaming the Jews for all our troubles while worshippers a Jew god. Meanwhile, they mock moron Mormans for believing the exact same stupidity (lone nutcase on a mountain talking to himself) with the sole addition of an alien planet named Kolob.

    If we truly are too stupid to shrug off this yoke of imbecility, I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.

    Fortunately, I have a sense of humor and delight in the knowledge that the Jews will be the first to go and entirely as a result of their own dissembling nonsense. Booble Thumping Christians will be next and once they’re gone the inbred low IQ Hinpoohs won’t stand a chance. The poor Buttists will see it coming, but by then the tsunami will be unstoppable. Goodbye Civilization. See you again in another 70,000 years perhaps...
    , @peterAUS

    .... the betrayal by the Boer establishment- the Boer politicians and church leaders and big businessmen..
     
    Don't say......

    Also, sounds familiar.

    Ah, yes, but this time, and PLACE, it will be different.
    The HOPE.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Malla says:
    @Stan d Mute

    They then taught these people to read and write their own language.
     
    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics. We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    The East Asians and Mesopotamians with their primitive pictographic languages at least managed to innovate an impressive amount given the limitations. Africans never innovated even the most basic of concepts like the wheel. Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.

    Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization.

    Well I agree with you that the best solution for the race problem would be complete separation. The failure is of the White race which went about trying to spread Western civilization everywhere. Big mistake. There are genetic racial differences on AVERAGE in outlook towards everything. Our brains are wired differently it seems. Not completely differently, we have a lot of similarities as humans but there are differences enough to make multi racial/ multi cultural societies failures in the long run. This whole project was bound to fail. That is why the White Africans either should leave or get their own republics. There is no other option.

    However I have come across black people who are good, well mannered, kind and intelligent, mostly educated Africans and a few black Americans too. I have come across honest good Jewish people too. Maybe they are some kind of minority in their group. Indeed some of the blacks I knew were better than most Indians I know. There are variations in every race.

    Check out the Congolese guy at 28:01 to 33:38

    I have an Indian friend who does some business in Africa something to do with the sugarcane industry. He told me he would rather do business with blacks and whites than Indians because Indians never pay for service rendered. White customers in general were the best, the black business customer will eventually pay up but Indians just do not pay. He avoids Indian customers like hell even though he is Indian himself. But there are honest Indians too. Just that the percentage out of a population is smaller.

    So I do not think it is possible to judge an individual as all individuals do not behave as the AVERAGE of their groups. But we make stereotypes to protect ourselves as it is not possible to know the nature of each and every stranger, we do not have time and have to make quick decisions.

    But I still agree that complete separation of the races is the best option. Whites and blacks should separate out and leave and live in peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stan d Mute

    I have come across black people who are good, well mannered, kind and intelligent, mostly educated Africans and a few black Americans too. I have come across honest good Jewish people too. Maybe they are some kind of minority in their group.
     
    That’s the same fallacious reasoning that has created the USA (and global) impending collapse. You cannot judge on the outliers or freaks. You cannot make bathroom rules for 300,000,000 people based on a handful of insane freaks who chop off their own penis. You cannot say, “Bantus are the same as us” just because you’ve met one who seemed awfully similar except skin pigmentation and tendency towards obesity and diabetes.

    When half the poopulation of India is still shitting in the streets and water supplies of India, you cannot claim “Indians are a smart and advanced race.” When half of whites still believe in fairies, you cannot really say we are a scientifically advanced race. Eugenics was and still is the only way our species advances. After just a hundred years of abandonment of eugenic principles, one doesn’t need to look very far ahead to see the end of everything and return to the Stone Age.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. The author doesn’t like any of the racial separation laws that were on the books in S.A. when it was controlled by whites but doesn’t realize that you can’t have it both ways. Either blacks are kept under control or be excluded completely from the country. To not control them you have the U.S. or Brazil where feral blacks victimize whites on a constant basis. Whites and blacks simply cannot live together, blacks will always be a burden.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. Bliss says:
    @MacNucc11
    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler. Don't bet on China throwing in. Communism is all but done and they are hardcore nationalists. They also have no shame which is in their favor.

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler.

    This self-loathing Indian Malla must be the sales agent in India for Mein Kampf.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer, the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”. He has dedicated his life to bashing the “subhuman” race he was unfortunately born into.

    What a pathetic creature…

    Read More
    • Agree: Okechukwu
    • Replies: @Malla

    self-loathing Indian Malla
     
    LOL I love myself too much. Ask my friends. When I was younger, my friends complained that I was a bit narcissistic.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer,
     
    Hey if there were positive sides to the British Empire why not? Facts are facts.

    the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”.
     
    Many Indian nationalists admire Hitler because he was a nationalist. Tough guys. Tough nationalist guys admire him. They do not need your permission, a permission of a foreigner, to admire the people they wish to admire. You have the right to decide what they admire or not?

    What a pathetic creature…
     
    LOL anything is better than being the hateful piece of shit that you are.
    , @Malla

    He has dedicated his life to bashing the “subhuman” race he was unfortunately born into.
     
    Then should I be an Indian nationalist. Let me tell you about how Indian nationalist like folks think. OK. When I was a kid in class, my class mates who were all proud Indian nationalists believed
    1] We Indians are the most intelligent people on Earth.
    2] We had the most oldest and greatest civilization on Earth.
    3] White people are barbarians with no culture. They stole many ancient technologies from our ancient texts.
    You are happy till now. But let us go further in what they think
    4] Black Africans are junglee monkeys and savages. They are dumb brutes who live on trees.
    5] East Asians eat all sort of things. They have weird faces
    6] All non Indians have no culture, no civilization to be taken seriously. Only we have a culture.

    Are you happy now?
    I did rather stick with facts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. Joe Wong says:
    @Anonymous
    Only a Jewess could twist news from South Africa into a two-minute hate against America.

    Well, the American can do better than a Jewess, the Americans even bombed, killed and waterboarded millions of people for decades on fabricated WMD allegations without provocation, wage an all out trade war by allege Chinese stealing their technologies without proof, while they are benefiting handsomely from Chinese supplied cheap and quality materials to maintain their living standard that they cannot afford themselves, etc.

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate ….

    Read More
    • LOL: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Malla

    they hate people different from they
     
    I guess most people in the world are like that.

    they hate people have independent mind
     
    People brainwashed by commies do not have independent minds.
    , @Anonymous

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate
     
    Then pack your bags and hit the road, Charlie Chan.
    , @Them Guys
    Ahhh Soooo! Chop, Chop.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @republic
    Not a very good article. This writer's race caused a lot of the problems the Boers today are facing in South Africa.

    Before he died in 2002, the late great white nationalist, Dr. Pierce gave a lot of speeches which are still available today on the real reasons for why the last white government gave up its rule in SA.

    The lesson of South Africa

    said among other things that the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers, also the jews were pumping spiritual poison into the White population urging them to surrender rather than fight. But Pierce said it was the betrayal by the Boer establishment- the Boer politicians and church leaders and big businessmen which sealed the fate of South Africa

    the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers

    Of course it did. Look how the Catholic Church has betrayed white Catholics, the evangelical churches have betrayed white evangelicals, etc, ad nauseum.

    For all the awareness of Jewish manipulation around here, it’s absolutely astounding how stupid Christians are on the topic of the grandest manipulation foisted on their ancestors and which their ancestors foisted upon them. Too stupid to realize Tinkerbelle isn’t real, that it’s a retarded fable of desert dwelling morons, they suck it up like soy milkshakes. They have Faith that they are exactly the same as Africans (maybe they are on a cognitive level) because some desert rat’s desiccated scrolls tell them they’re all created in Tinkerbelle’s image.

    The stupidity of adhering to Neolithic sand myths in the Space Age is equalled only by the hypocrisy of blaming the Jews for all our troubles while worshippers a Jew god. Meanwhile, they mock moron Mormans for believing the exact same stupidity (lone nutcase on a mountain talking to himself) with the sole addition of an alien planet named Kolob.

    If we truly are too stupid to shrug off this yoke of imbecility, I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.

    Fortunately, I have a sense of humor and delight in the knowledge that the Jews will be the first to go and entirely as a result of their own dissembling nonsense. Booble Thumping Christians will be next and once they’re gone the inbred low IQ Hinpoohs won’t stand a chance. The poor Buttists will see it coming, but by then the tsunami will be unstoppable. Goodbye Civilization. See you again in another 70,000 years perhaps…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss

    I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.
     
    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?
    , @anarchyst
    The “beginning of the end” of traditional Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants who were involved in the "modernization" of the Catholic Church.

    Much Catholic ritual and doctrine was discarded or changed, in order to reflect the "age" that we live in, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ and Christianity which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their "dirty work" for them...assigning Jesus Christ's crucifixion and death to the Jews, is NOT "blood libes" as, even today, Jews DO hate Jesus Christ and Christianity, their Talmud stating that "Jesus Christ is suffering in boiling excrement for eternity" while his mother Mary "conceived Jesus Christ with a Roman soldier"--Jewish Talmudic doctrine--not mine.
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many traditional Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back" against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize pre-Vatican II principles.
    Fortunately, there are Catholic organizations that subscribe to pre-Vatican II principles, one being the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).
    , @APilgrim
    By the reckoning of Stan d Mute,

    Jesus of Nazareth was the biggest dupe of all human history.

    Moses was a 'desert rat'.

    Neanderthals had low IQs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. @Malla

    Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization.
     
    Well I agree with you that the best solution for the race problem would be complete separation. The failure is of the White race which went about trying to spread Western civilization everywhere. Big mistake. There are genetic racial differences on AVERAGE in outlook towards everything. Our brains are wired differently it seems. Not completely differently, we have a lot of similarities as humans but there are differences enough to make multi racial/ multi cultural societies failures in the long run. This whole project was bound to fail. That is why the White Africans either should leave or get their own republics. There is no other option.

    However I have come across black people who are good, well mannered, kind and intelligent, mostly educated Africans and a few black Americans too. I have come across honest good Jewish people too. Maybe they are some kind of minority in their group. Indeed some of the blacks I knew were better than most Indians I know. There are variations in every race.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwPlY6EYnJ8
    Check out the Congolese guy at 28:01 to 33:38

    I have an Indian friend who does some business in Africa something to do with the sugarcane industry. He told me he would rather do business with blacks and whites than Indians because Indians never pay for service rendered. White customers in general were the best, the black business customer will eventually pay up but Indians just do not pay. He avoids Indian customers like hell even though he is Indian himself. But there are honest Indians too. Just that the percentage out of a population is smaller.

    So I do not think it is possible to judge an individual as all individuals do not behave as the AVERAGE of their groups. But we make stereotypes to protect ourselves as it is not possible to know the nature of each and every stranger, we do not have time and have to make quick decisions.

    But I still agree that complete separation of the races is the best option. Whites and blacks should separate out and leave and live in peace.

    I have come across black people who are good, well mannered, kind and intelligent, mostly educated Africans and a few black Americans too. I have come across honest good Jewish people too. Maybe they are some kind of minority in their group.

    That’s the same fallacious reasoning that has created the USA (and global) impending collapse. You cannot judge on the outliers or freaks. You cannot make bathroom rules for 300,000,000 people based on a handful of insane freaks who chop off their own penis. You cannot say, “Bantus are the same as us” just because you’ve met one who seemed awfully similar except skin pigmentation and tendency towards obesity and diabetes.

    When half the poopulation of India is still shitting in the streets and water supplies of India, you cannot claim “Indians are a smart and advanced race.” When half of whites still believe in fairies, you cannot really say we are a scientifically advanced race. Eugenics was and still is the only way our species advances. After just a hundred years of abandonment of eugenic principles, one doesn’t need to look very far ahead to see the end of everything and return to the Stone Age.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Eugenics was and still is the only way our species advances.
     
    Very true. But the globalist elites would NEVER allow that. They want us all to become dumb and barbaric.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Okechukwu says:
    @Stan d Mute

    They then taught these people to read and write their own language.
     
    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics. We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    The East Asians and Mesopotamians with their primitive pictographic languages at least managed to innovate an impressive amount given the limitations. Africans never innovated even the most basic of concepts like the wheel. Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.

    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics.

    Can you identify any ancient manuscripts from North, West or Central Europe? Any papyri? Stone tablets? Symbolic pictography? Anything? Europeans were some of the last adopters of writing. And it was imposed on them, they couldn’t figure it out on their own.

    On the other hand:

    Ancient African Writing

    http://www.taneter.org/writing.html

    On math.

    Ancient African Mathematics

    http://www.taneter.org/math.html

    13 Interesting Facts About Math in Ancient Africa

    https://blog.mindresearch.org/blog/math-facts-ancient-africa

    Mathematics in (central) Africa before colonization

    http://etopia.sintlucas.be/3.14/Ishango_meeting/Mathematics_Africa.pdf

    Your lies are too easy to refute, bruh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. TG says:

    The white minority government of South Africa DID do something evil… it just never gets mentioned.

    They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked. But in the long run, poverty and political stability do not go together…

    South Africa used to be pretty prosperous, even with apartheid the blacks were doing not so bad. And of course, the fertility rate was pretty low, for blacks and whites alike. If the government had just let the people alone, perhaps they could have come to some sort of accommodation. But no, the elites – first white, then black – wanted their cheap labor. So the population of South Africa was deliberately tripled from about 20 million to about 60 million and climbing… and native blacks protesting this abusive open borders cheap-labor immigration policy, are slandered as ‘racist.’ Of course.

    But we can’t talk about how governments forcing population increases against the will of the general public drives wages down… no, that is taboo.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked. But in the long run, poverty and political stability do not go together…
     
    Very true. Blacks were rushing to get into "evil, apartheid" Africa. people vote with their feet.
    , @peterAUS

    ...They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked.
     
    and

    But we can’t talk about how governments forcing population increases against the will of the general public drives wages down… no, that is taboo.
     
    Yup.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @jim jones
    Nobody cares about the Boers. Just like the Russians they are perpetual losers:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcXNPI-IPPM

    If I were to believe all Boers were like those shown in the video, I would say let the african savages have them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bj
    This guy is a more typical Afrikaner.

    Your Security in South Africa | Craig Roseveare

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhiM9lBmdoE

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Bliss says:
    @Stan d Mute

    the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers
     
    Of course it did. Look how the Catholic Church has betrayed white Catholics, the evangelical churches have betrayed white evangelicals, etc, ad nauseum.

    For all the awareness of Jewish manipulation around here, it’s absolutely astounding how stupid Christians are on the topic of the grandest manipulation foisted on their ancestors and which their ancestors foisted upon them. Too stupid to realize Tinkerbelle isn’t real, that it’s a retarded fable of desert dwelling morons, they suck it up like soy milkshakes. They have Faith that they are exactly the same as Africans (maybe they are on a cognitive level) because some desert rat’s desiccated scrolls tell them they’re all created in Tinkerbelle’s image.

    The stupidity of adhering to Neolithic sand myths in the Space Age is equalled only by the hypocrisy of blaming the Jews for all our troubles while worshippers a Jew god. Meanwhile, they mock moron Mormans for believing the exact same stupidity (lone nutcase on a mountain talking to himself) with the sole addition of an alien planet named Kolob.

    If we truly are too stupid to shrug off this yoke of imbecility, I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.

    Fortunately, I have a sense of humor and delight in the knowledge that the Jews will be the first to go and entirely as a result of their own dissembling nonsense. Booble Thumping Christians will be next and once they’re gone the inbred low IQ Hinpoohs won’t stand a chance. The poor Buttists will see it coming, but by then the tsunami will be unstoppable. Goodbye Civilization. See you again in another 70,000 years perhaps...

    I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.

    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?
     
    Except those humans had nothing to do with present day blacks

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjpIqzGrFR8

    Assuming the Out of Africa theory is true (ASSUMING), those early modern humans were not like today’s black Negroid people. Black Negroid people did not even exist when those early humans left Africa.This belief that Africa is a black only continent is wrong as hell. There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.
    The Manot skull, one of the first human skulls found in the Middle East is already similar to European skulls.
    Indeed black Negroids have genes which is not found in other humans but the blacks got it from archaic primitive humanoids before modern humans even left Africa. In other words, these humans who left Africa did not carry this gene which blacks got 150,000 years ago!!! How is that possible if blacks (who did not look like today’s blacks but are the ancestors of Negroid blacks) are the ancestors of the population who left Africa. This population which left Africa was a distinct population from black Negroid and may already have looked European or at least Caucasiod.
    Negroids have greater genetic diversity because they have absorbed genes from more primitive humanoids. In other words, the population which left Africa was a population which had nothing to do with the ancestors of black negroids (who had not yet evolved/ devolved into Negroids by then).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. anarchyst says:
    @Stan d Mute

    the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers
     
    Of course it did. Look how the Catholic Church has betrayed white Catholics, the evangelical churches have betrayed white evangelicals, etc, ad nauseum.

    For all the awareness of Jewish manipulation around here, it’s absolutely astounding how stupid Christians are on the topic of the grandest manipulation foisted on their ancestors and which their ancestors foisted upon them. Too stupid to realize Tinkerbelle isn’t real, that it’s a retarded fable of desert dwelling morons, they suck it up like soy milkshakes. They have Faith that they are exactly the same as Africans (maybe they are on a cognitive level) because some desert rat’s desiccated scrolls tell them they’re all created in Tinkerbelle’s image.

    The stupidity of adhering to Neolithic sand myths in the Space Age is equalled only by the hypocrisy of blaming the Jews for all our troubles while worshippers a Jew god. Meanwhile, they mock moron Mormans for believing the exact same stupidity (lone nutcase on a mountain talking to himself) with the sole addition of an alien planet named Kolob.

    If we truly are too stupid to shrug off this yoke of imbecility, I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.

    Fortunately, I have a sense of humor and delight in the knowledge that the Jews will be the first to go and entirely as a result of their own dissembling nonsense. Booble Thumping Christians will be next and once they’re gone the inbred low IQ Hinpoohs won’t stand a chance. The poor Buttists will see it coming, but by then the tsunami will be unstoppable. Goodbye Civilization. See you again in another 70,000 years perhaps...

    The “beginning of the end” of traditional Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants who were involved in the “modernization” of the Catholic Church.

    [MORE]

    Much Catholic ritual and doctrine was discarded or changed, in order to reflect the “age” that we live in, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ and Christianity which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their “dirty work” for them…assigning Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death to the Jews, is NOT “blood libes” as, even today, Jews DO hate Jesus Christ and Christianity, their Talmud stating that “Jesus Christ is suffering in boiling excrement for eternity” while his mother Mary “conceived Jesus Christ with a Roman soldier”–Jewish Talmudic doctrine–not mine.
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many traditional Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back” against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize pre-Vatican II principles.
    Fortunately, there are Catholic organizations that subscribe to pre-Vatican II principles, one being the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler.
     
    This self-loathing Indian Malla must be the sales agent in India for Mein Kampf.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer, the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”. He has dedicated his life to bashing the “subhuman” race he was unfortunately born into.

    What a pathetic creature...

    self-loathing Indian Malla

    LOL I love myself too much. Ask my friends. When I was younger, my friends complained that I was a bit narcissistic.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer,

    Hey if there were positive sides to the British Empire why not? Facts are facts.

    the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”.

    Many Indian nationalists admire Hitler because he was a nationalist. Tough guys. Tough nationalist guys admire him. They do not need your permission, a permission of a foreigner, to admire the people they wish to admire. You have the right to decide what they admire or not?

    What a pathetic creature…

    LOL anything is better than being the hateful piece of shit that you are.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss

    LOL I love myself too much.
     
    Who are you kidding? You clearly suffer from a very deep seated inferiority complex. Which is why you have such a shamelessly slavish personality.
    , @Respect
    Malla

    As I understand european gypsies came to Europe about five or six centuries ago , they were expelled from India . Do you know why they were expelled from India ? . Thanks
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Che Guava says:
    @Malla
    Is it true that the "chosen of Yahweh" "took over" a large number of the businesses built up by the Japanese during the internment?

    I do nnt kmow about that, but if true, it would not surprise me at all.
    Just typical

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Malla says:
    @TG
    The white minority government of South Africa DID do something evil... it just never gets mentioned.

    They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked. But in the long run, poverty and political stability do not go together...

    South Africa used to be pretty prosperous, even with apartheid the blacks were doing not so bad. And of course, the fertility rate was pretty low, for blacks and whites alike. If the government had just let the people alone, perhaps they could have come to some sort of accommodation. But no, the elites - first white, then black - wanted their cheap labor. So the population of South Africa was deliberately tripled from about 20 million to about 60 million and climbing... and native blacks protesting this abusive open borders cheap-labor immigration policy, are slandered as 'racist.' Of course.

    But we can't talk about how governments forcing population increases against the will of the general public drives wages down... no, that is taboo.

    They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked. But in the long run, poverty and political stability do not go together…

    Very true. Blacks were rushing to get into “evil, apartheid” Africa. people vote with their feet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Joe Wong says:
    @shegetz
    With the tribal blacks of SA, it was always a matter of might is right. Now they have the power, they will be relentless.

    While the author was, to my limited knowledge anyway, a vocal advocate for the end of Apartheid, she has left the outcome and afaik is now in Israel, where the government will back you as a Jew, far more than it seems gentile whites get in the West nowadays in diversitopia.

    We know what is coming down the pipeline when we are reduced to minority in our lands, as it stands a Jewishly led and coordinated situation and one Jews in Israel would never countenance for themselves in their homeland as they know their own survival is at stake. They'd be made short work of by their enemies on all sides.

    So why are so many Jews openly engineering white minority in Anglophone countries and Western Europe? As the outcome is very probably a highly hostile situation for gentile whites to live in, given all the Jewishly led laws about racism that are lenient on minority racism against whites in the form of rape and brutality, but bring the sword of Damocles upon any white that opens their mouth against mass immigration/reduction to minority, it can only be interpreted the way it is, veiled hostility for gentile whites.

    Galling for Anglophones, we sacrificed, fought, killed and likewise perished in global conflagration not that long ago. What was it all for when the Jewish elite sell us out like this today?

    Sadly, unlike the author, living as I understand in a heavily armed society, with compulsory military service, a culture fostering excellence, nuclear options as insurance, even (unbelievably) generous USA taxpayer subsides, there is virtually nowhere for white gentiles to go. Otherwise we fight or perish.

    My heart goes out to the Afrikaner. Indeed, so did my wallet, but I suspected the charity operator used some of the funds for a personal holiday, so once bitten as they say.

    The White Europeans including their offshoots is where is now, still filthy rich (although always complaining), because of those hundreds of millions of people all over the world who were robbed and murdered, those who become victims of their very madness of colonialism and orientalism, of the crusades and the slave and Opium trades. Cathedrals and palaces, museums and theatres, train stations – all had been constructed on horrid foundations of bones and blood, and amalgamated by tears. There were so many centuries of plunder that the acts of looting the world for the sole benefit of the few, turned into inseparable part of the ‘Western existence and culture’, something that gets almost never addressed, let alone criticized.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Opium trades.
     
    Opium War and looting by evil YT?
    Lets discuss it shall we

    You cannot discuss the opium trade without discussing the Iraqi Jewish Sassoon family, the big kingpins on the trade. There are still docks and hospitals named after this family in India.

    The truth lies buried in the family line of David Sassoon, “The Rothschilds of The Far East,” and their monopoly over the opium trade.

    Britain won Hong Kong by launching the opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an entire nation!

    David Sassoon was born in Baghdad in 1792. His father, Saleh Sassoon, was a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, the governor of Baghdad. (Thus making him the “court Jew” – a highly influential position.)

    In 1829 Ahmet was overthrown due to corruption and the Sassoon family fled to Bombay, India. This was the strategic trade route to interior India and the gateway to the Far East. In a brief time the British government granted Sassoon “monopoly rights” to all manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most important of all – Opium – then the most addictive drug in the world!

    The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major opium exchanges in China.

    According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: “He employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews. . . and put them to work.”

    Sassoon’s sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China.

    More about them here

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/04/11/the-magnificent-sassoons-raking-money-off-chinese-and-indian-misery-with-british-troops/

    http://www.ibtimes.co.in/chinas-opium-war-was-completely-indian-enterprise-not-british-indian-author-amitav-ghosh-628177

    China’s Opium War Was ‘Completely Indian Enterprise’, not British: Indian Author Amitav Ghosh

    At this juncture he found that the first opium war in China was an Indian undertaking. “The first opium war (was) planned in India, it was financed by Indian money, it was fought with Indian soldiers. But it has all completely vanished from our historical memory,” Ghosh, whose third book of Ibis series ‘Flood of Fire’ is all about migration in the 1830s, told IANS.

    “The putting together of the expeditionary force took place in India. The British naval ships for the expedition were accompanied by 50 supply ships, all provided for by Parsi merchants in Bombay (now Mumbai). From top to bottom, it was a completely Indian enterprise; all the wherewithal for it came from India,” he added.
    , @Malla
    Who opposed the Opium trade?
    Why Evil YT ofcourse.

    From

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium#Prohibition_and_conflict_in_China

    The opium trade incurred intense enmity from the later British Prime Minister William Ewart Gladstone.[65] As a member of Parliament, Gladstone called it “most infamous and atrocious” referring to the opium trade between China and British India in particular.[66] Gladstone was fiercely against both of the Opium Wars Britain waged in China in the First Opium War initiated in 1840 and the Second Opium War initiated in 1857, denounced British violence against Chinese, and was ardently opposed to the British trade in opium to China.[67] Gladstone lambasted it as “Palmerston’s Opium War” and said that he felt “in dread of the judgments of God upon England for our national iniquity towards China” in May 1840.[68] A famous speech was made by Gladstone in Parliament against the First Opium War.[69][70] Gladstone criticized it as “a war more unjust in its origin, a war more calculated in its progress to cover this country with permanent disgrace”.[71] His hostility to opium stemmed from the effects of opium brought upon his sister Helen.[72] Due to the First Opium war brought on by Palmerston, there was initial reluctance to join the government of Peel on part of Gladstone before 1841.[73]

    Scientific evidence of the pernicious nature of opium use was largely undocumented in the 1890s, when Protestant missionaries in China decided to strengthen their opposition to the trade by compiling data which would demonstrate the harm the drug did. Faced with the problem that many Chinese associated Christianity with opium, partly due to the arrival of early Protestant missionaries on opium clippers, at the 1890 Shanghai Missionary Conference, they agreed to establish the Permanent Committee for the Promotion of Anti-Opium Societies in an attempt to overcome this problem and to arouse public opinion against the opium trade. The members of the committee were John Glasgow Kerr, MD, American Presbyterian Mission in Canton; B.C. Atterbury, MD, American Presbyterian Mission in Peking; Archdeacon Arthur E. Moule, Church Missionary Society in Shanghai; Henry Whitney, MD, American Board of Commissioners for foreign Missions in Foochow; the Rev. Samuel Clarke, China Inland Mission in Kweiyang; the Rev. Arthur Gostick Shorrock, English Baptist Mission in Taiyuan; and the Rev. Griffith John, London Mission Society in Hankow.[75] These missionaries were generally outraged over the British government’s Royal Commission on Opium visiting India but not China. Accordingly, the missionaries first organized the Anti-Opium League in China among their colleagues in every mission station in China. American missionary Hampden Coit DuBose acted as first president. This organization, which had elected national officers and held an annual national meeting, was instrumental in gathering data from every Western-trained medical doctor in China, which was then published as William Hector Park compiled Opinions of Over 100 Physicians on the Use of Opium in China (Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press, 1899). The vast majority of these medical doctors were missionaries; the survey also included doctors who were in private practices, particularly in Shanghai and Hong Kong, as well as Chinese who had been trained in medical schools in Western countries. In England, the home director of the China Inland Mission, Benjamin Broomhall, was an active opponent of the opium trade, writing two books to promote the banning of opium smoking: The Truth about Opium Smoking and The Chinese Opium Smoker. In 1888, Broomhall formed and became secretary of the Christian Union for the Severance of the British Empire with the Opium Traffic and editor of its periodical, National Righteousness. He lobbied the British Parliament to stop the opium trade. He and James Laidlaw Maxwell appealed to the London Missionary Conference of 1888 and the Edinburgh Missionary Conference of 1910 to condemn the continuation of the trade. When Broomhall was dying, his son Marshall read to him from The Times the welcome news that an agreement had been signed ensuring the end of the opium trade within two years.
    , @Malla

    slave trade
     
    Lets discuss this too.

    Check this out

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_Trade_Act_1807

    The Slave Trade Act 1807, officially the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act 1807,[1] abolished the slave trade in the British Empire, in particular the Atlantic slave trade, and also encouraged British action to press other European states to abolish their slave trades, but it did not abolish slavery itself. The United States, another major power involved in the Atlantic slave trade, passed the comparable Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves that same month, taking effect on 1 January 1808.

    The act was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed on 25 March 1807, with the title of “An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade”. The original act is in the Parliamentary Archives.

    Many of the supporters thought the Act would lead to the death of slavery, but it was not until 26 years later that slavery itself was actually abolished.

    And the Arabs still had black slaves upto 1962

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7EEyTNMwUU

    Watch from 4:01
    Rich Arabs Give Their Children Black Slaves As Birthday Gifts, black slaves kids carrying the books of their Arab master kids.

    And they would not have stopped it if the British, other Europeans and Americans had not forced them to.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_George_Gordon

    Moreover, considerable progress was made in the suppression of the slave trade.[104] Gordon wrote in a letter to his sister about the Africans living a “life of fear and misery”, but in spite of the “utter misery” of Equatoria that “I like this work”.[105] Gordon often personally intercepted slave convoys to arrest the slavers and break the chains of the slaves, but he found that the corrupt Egyptian bureaucrats usually sold the freed Africans back into slavery, and the expense of caring for thousands of freed slaves who were a long away from home burdensome.[106]

    During this period Gordon grew close to the Anti-Slavery Society, an evangelical Christian group based in London dedicated to ending slavery all over the world, and who regularly celebrated Gordon’s efforts to end slavery in the Sudan.[84] Urban wrote that: “Newspaper readers in Bolton or Beaminister had become enraged by stories about chained black children, cruelly abducted, being sold into slave markets…”, and Gordon’s anti-slavery efforts contributed to his image as a saintly man.[84]

    Gordon had come into conflict with the Egyptian governor of Khartoum and Sudan over his efforts to ban slavery.


    …snip….

    Governor-General of the Sudan[edit]
    As governor, Gordon faced a variety of challenges. Besides working to end slavery, Gordon carried out a series of reforms such as abolishing torture and public floggings where those opposed to the Egyptian state were flogged with a whip known as the kourbash made of buffalo hide

    Slavery was the basis of the Sudanese economy, and Gordon’s attempts to end the slave trade meant taking on very powerful vested interests, most notably Rahama Zobeir, known as the “King of the Slavers” as he was the richest and most powerful of all the slave traders in the entire Sudan. An insurrection had broken out in Darfur province led by associates of Zobeir and Gordon went to deal with it. The insurgents were numerous, and he saw that diplomacy had a better chance of success. On 2 September 1877, Gordon clad in the full gold-braided ceremonial blue uniform of the Governor-General of the Sudan and wearing the tarboush (the type of fez reserved for a pasha), accompanied by an interpreter and a few bashi-bazouks, rode unannounced into the enemy camp to discuss the situation.[115]
    , @Malla
    Regarding slavery let us check this out

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxydlMaikBY

    From 00.00 minutes
    African kingdoms were major part in slavery. they did not stop slavery, Europeans did.
    The African soldier of the past proudly says they are a military people who sold slaves.
    at 06:52 African kings played a big role in the slave trade, many African kingdoms depended on slavery. Before Europeans landed in Africa, slavery was already in the system, it were slaves who worked for African kings.
    at 22:38 to 23:04 Ashanti made a lot of money on slavery
    at 30:04 Dahomey Kingdom was so warlike that other Africans had to make a venice like village in a lake to escape.
    at 31:30 the Dahohomey and neighbouring Kingdoms traded in slaves for ammunition. Dahomey themselves 1 million as slaves.
    the Dahomey even sacrificed their enemies, yes human sacrifice.
    At 33:20, the Dahomey were warlike, wars every year. Enemies were beheaded. Conquest and power and being greedy of power was considered a good thing for the King to have in Dahomey culture.
    At 34:50 Human sacrifice of enemy kings
    At 37:38 How much slavery was in the Dahomey kingdom
    At 45:15 a black guy of Benin said that the people sold into slavery were lucky or they would have been sacrificed, so slavery saved the lives of the blacks sold as slaves.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oag1eE2qMw

    At 14:40 to 16:20 minutes, slavery still going strong in the Sahara. It is traditional. Indeed the locals say, the Bela slaves love being slaves of the Tuareg. Wow. Lovely.

    Yeah rite, the West and Whites are uniquely evil. Yeah rite.
    If you think life was paradise before European colonialism, you have got to be thick.
    , @Malla
    Many of those cathedrals were built before colonialism even began

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Lincoln_Cathedral_viewed_from_Lincoln_Castle.jpg

    This is the Lincoln Cathedral in Lincoln, England. Building commenced in 1072 and continued in several phases throughout the medieval period. It was the tallest building in the world for 238 years (1311–1549). It was the first building in the world taller than the Great Pyramid of Giza. But even then it was not the largest cathedral in England, York Cathedral was even larger.
    This was built before colonialism even began. And there are loads of such cathedrals in Europe before 1600.

    Also Haiti, the poor shithole carribean country too was a colonial power. After genociding the French Whites on that island (except a few Germans and Poles) they colonized the Dominican Republic. The Dominican Republic celebrates their independence day from Haiti. So why is Haiti with its colonial history not rich?

    https://www.officeholidays.com/countries/dominican_republic/independence-day.php

    This public holiday is always celebrated on 27 February.
    It is the Dominican Republic's National Day and it commemorates independence from Haiti in 1844.
    , @Anon
    Perhaps your seemingly invincible stupidity and ignorance can be penetrated by getting you to think deeply about Europe's richest country. Germany's railways, factories, housing and much else of its infrastructure and even agricultural capacity were destroyed by the end of WW2 and many of it's people displaced. It didn't recover and recover and overtake all others while paying out much compensation to victims and pensions to disabled members of its armed forces because of any past or current colonial or imperial depredations. Think human capital and social cooperation. Familiar concepts? They should be if you consider the differences in economic growth between some or most East Asian politics and African or Latin American countries since 1945.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler.
     
    This self-loathing Indian Malla must be the sales agent in India for Mein Kampf.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer, the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”. He has dedicated his life to bashing the “subhuman” race he was unfortunately born into.

    What a pathetic creature...

    He has dedicated his life to bashing the “subhuman” race he was unfortunately born into.

    Then should I be an Indian nationalist. Let me tell you about how Indian nationalist like folks think. OK. When I was a kid in class, my class mates who were all proud Indian nationalists believed
    1] We Indians are the most intelligent people on Earth.
    2] We had the most oldest and greatest civilization on Earth.
    3] White people are barbarians with no culture. They stole many ancient technologies from our ancient texts.
    You are happy till now. But let us go further in what they think
    4] Black Africans are junglee monkeys and savages. They are dumb brutes who live on trees.
    5] East Asians eat all sort of things. They have weird faces
    6] All non Indians have no culture, no civilization to be taken seriously. Only we have a culture.

    Are you happy now?
    I did rather stick with facts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.
     
    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?

    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?

    Except those humans had nothing to do with present day blacks

    Assuming the Out of Africa theory is true (ASSUMING), those early modern humans were not like today’s black Negroid people. Black Negroid people did not even exist when those early humans left Africa.This belief that Africa is a black only continent is wrong as hell. There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.
    The Manot skull, one of the first human skulls found in the Middle East is already similar to European skulls.
    Indeed black Negroids have genes which is not found in other humans but the blacks got it from archaic primitive humanoids before modern humans even left Africa. In other words, these humans who left Africa did not carry this gene which blacks got 150,000 years ago!!! How is that possible if blacks (who did not look like today’s blacks but are the ancestors of Negroid blacks) are the ancestors of the population who left Africa. This population which left Africa was a distinct population from black Negroid and may already have looked European or at least Caucasiod.
    Negroids have greater genetic diversity because they have absorbed genes from more primitive humanoids. In other words, the population which left Africa was a population which had nothing to do with the ancestors of black negroids (who had not yet evolved/ devolved into Negroids by then).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss
    Lol at this black wannabe nordicist.

    Here’s what the British saw you as:

    https://dreamofacity.com/2016/12/19/bowbazar-to-former-black-town-calcutta/

    Calcutta in its heyday was divided into two main districts – White Town, which was where the British and other Europeans lived their lives and did their business, and Black Town, which was where the local Bengalis resided.

    In between White Town and Black Town, a kind of “grey area” emerged; a district in which everyone who was neither British nor Bengali were housed. Here in the area generally known as Bowbazar, one found Calcutta’s Chinatown, Muslim and Jewish Quarters, as well as communities of Buddhists, Parsis, Ismailis, Portuguese-Eurasians and Anglo-Indians.
    , @Bliss

    There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.
     
    Whadda silly moron, getting all excited about something that proves the opposite of what he thinks:

    https://www.mpg.de/research/hofmeyr-skull-supports-out-of-africa-theory

    Hofmeyr-Skull supports the "Out of Africa"-Theory
    Dating of skull delivers the first fossil indicator that modern humans evolved in Africa


    The surprising similarity between a fossil skull from the southernmost tip of Africa and similarly ancient skulls from Europe is in agreement with the genetics-based "Out of Africa" theory, which predicts that humans like those that inhabited Eurasia in the Upper Paleolithic should be found in sub-Saharan Africa around 36,000 years ago. The skull from South Africa provides the first fossil evidence in support of this prediction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    self-loathing Indian Malla
     
    LOL I love myself too much. Ask my friends. When I was younger, my friends complained that I was a bit narcissistic.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer,
     
    Hey if there were positive sides to the British Empire why not? Facts are facts.

    the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”.
     
    Many Indian nationalists admire Hitler because he was a nationalist. Tough guys. Tough nationalist guys admire him. They do not need your permission, a permission of a foreigner, to admire the people they wish to admire. You have the right to decide what they admire or not?

    What a pathetic creature…
     
    LOL anything is better than being the hateful piece of shit that you are.

    LOL I love myself too much.

    Who are you kidding? You clearly suffer from a very deep seated inferiority complex. Which is why you have such a shamelessly slavish personality.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    You clearly suffer from a very deep seated inferiority complex.
     
    Please spare me your low IQ nonsense. I am just stating facts.
    I am human, I cannot fly as an eagle. I am just stating facts. Does this make me self hating?
    I was born as a human, without mechanical aid I cannot run as fast as a cheetah. Do I lose sleep over this? Do I hate myself over this? Do I dream of secretly being born a cheetah?
    It is you who are obsessed with White. You who are filled with hatred for White people. You need to see a psychiatrist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Malla says:
    @Stan d Mute

    I have come across black people who are good, well mannered, kind and intelligent, mostly educated Africans and a few black Americans too. I have come across honest good Jewish people too. Maybe they are some kind of minority in their group.
     
    That’s the same fallacious reasoning that has created the USA (and global) impending collapse. You cannot judge on the outliers or freaks. You cannot make bathroom rules for 300,000,000 people based on a handful of insane freaks who chop off their own penis. You cannot say, “Bantus are the same as us” just because you’ve met one who seemed awfully similar except skin pigmentation and tendency towards obesity and diabetes.

    When half the poopulation of India is still shitting in the streets and water supplies of India, you cannot claim “Indians are a smart and advanced race.” When half of whites still believe in fairies, you cannot really say we are a scientifically advanced race. Eugenics was and still is the only way our species advances. After just a hundred years of abandonment of eugenic principles, one doesn’t need to look very far ahead to see the end of everything and return to the Stone Age.

    Eugenics was and still is the only way our species advances.

    Very true. But the globalist elites would NEVER allow that. They want us all to become dumb and barbaric.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    Well, the American can do better than a Jewess, the Americans even bombed, killed and waterboarded millions of people for decades on fabricated WMD allegations without provocation, wage an all out trade war by allege Chinese stealing their technologies without proof, while they are benefiting handsomely from Chinese supplied cheap and quality materials to maintain their living standard that they cannot afford themselves, etc.

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate ....

    they hate people different from they

    I guess most people in the world are like that.

    they hate people have independent mind

    People brainwashed by commies do not have independent minds.

    Read More
    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Why do you hate commies so much? Is it because they have different minds than yours? Or the communism make your way of life, 'capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism' appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. Before white man came to South Africa, a few hundreeds of thousands of people have lived there, mostly hunting big animals. White men established agriculture, mining, and later – the state, the industries and all the servicies. As they needed workers – Niggers from the rest of Africa have been comming there, because there has been the food, the salaries, schools, medical aid, and street security – things that other African states are suffering from the lack of it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    LOL I love myself too much.
     
    Who are you kidding? You clearly suffer from a very deep seated inferiority complex. Which is why you have such a shamelessly slavish personality.

    You clearly suffer from a very deep seated inferiority complex.

    Please spare me your low IQ nonsense. I am just stating facts.
    I am human, I cannot fly as an eagle. I am just stating facts. Does this make me self hating?
    I was born as a human, without mechanical aid I cannot run as fast as a cheetah. Do I lose sleep over this? Do I hate myself over this? Do I dream of secretly being born a cheetah?
    It is you who are obsessed with White. You who are filled with hatred for White people. You need to see a psychiatrist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss
    I bash liars and haters regardless of whether they are black like you or white like the majority here. How the hell does that make me a hater?

    You on the other hand have embraced hate with a passion. What makes you look so pathetic is your slavish identification with racists who hate your race.

    If anyone needs to see a psychiatrist it’s you. You are obviously a seriously f**ked up lowlife.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?
     
    Except those humans had nothing to do with present day blacks

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjpIqzGrFR8

    Assuming the Out of Africa theory is true (ASSUMING), those early modern humans were not like today’s black Negroid people. Black Negroid people did not even exist when those early humans left Africa.This belief that Africa is a black only continent is wrong as hell. There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.
    The Manot skull, one of the first human skulls found in the Middle East is already similar to European skulls.
    Indeed black Negroids have genes which is not found in other humans but the blacks got it from archaic primitive humanoids before modern humans even left Africa. In other words, these humans who left Africa did not carry this gene which blacks got 150,000 years ago!!! How is that possible if blacks (who did not look like today’s blacks but are the ancestors of Negroid blacks) are the ancestors of the population who left Africa. This population which left Africa was a distinct population from black Negroid and may already have looked European or at least Caucasiod.
    Negroids have greater genetic diversity because they have absorbed genes from more primitive humanoids. In other words, the population which left Africa was a population which had nothing to do with the ancestors of black negroids (who had not yet evolved/ devolved into Negroids by then).

    Lol at this black wannabe nordicist.

    Here’s what the British saw you as:

    https://dreamofacity.com/2016/12/19/bowbazar-to-former-black-town-calcutta/

    Calcutta in its heyday was divided into two main districts – White Town, which was where the British and other Europeans lived their lives and did their business, and Black Town, which was where the local Bengalis resided.

    In between White Town and Black Town, a kind of “grey area” emerged; a district in which everyone who was neither British nor Bengali were housed. Here in the area generally known as Bowbazar, one found Calcutta’s Chinatown, Muslim and Jewish Quarters, as well as communities of Buddhists, Parsis, Ismailis, Portuguese-Eurasians and Anglo-Indians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    So?
    Bengalis range in skin colour from light brown to extremely dark brown. But to a Northern Euro White person even a light brown Caucasoid subcontinental may seem as black. So they called the part of the city where Bengalis lived as blacktown. Makes perfect logical sense to me. To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    Most Hindus avoid contact with all non Hindus. Europeans, Africans, East Asians you name it. They are called Mleccha, or barbarians. So Europeans were not unique in this.

    What are you exactly trying to prove here? That I consider myself a wannabe White? You can go through all my comments on Unz, NOWHERE do I show this sentiment.
    Were the Europeans who took the side of blacks in their abolition of slavery called wannabe blacks?
    What is wrong with you head? Why don't you pour some water on it? It might increase your IQ a bit, maybe to 32.
    , @Bliss
    So British apartheid was practiced in India more than a century before it was officially introduced in South Africa.

    Btw, many Indians and Malays were also shipped to South Africa as slaves. And after slavery was abolished in the 19th century, as indentured servants:

    https://mediadiversified.org/2016/05/18/where-were-south-africas-slaves-from/

    In the early years, 80% of slaves to South Africa came from India (this included Sri Lanka). Slaves would continue to be brought from India, but over the years other regions of the world also gained importance.

    Records indicate slaves as also originating from West and Central Africa, with places of origin often collectively referred to as the Guinea coast, but specifically including the Cape Verde Islands, Burkina Faso, Benin, Congo, Angola, and also Zanzibar and Ethiopia (Abyssinia).

    Outside of Africa slaves were from: Siam (Thailand), Persia (Iran), Arabia (north Africa and the Arabian Peninsula), Brazil, Burma, China, Japan, Borneo, Timor and Vietnam, amongst other origins. There are also mentions of Tagal, possibly pointing to Filipinos who spoke Tagalog.

    So slaves from as far away as China, Japan, Vietnam and Philippines also ended up in European colonies in Africa. Later of course, after slavery was abolished and replaced by indentured servitude, it was overwhelmingly asians (Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos etc) who were imported to white colonies to do the work previously done by slaves.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Malla says:

    Which is why you have such a shamelessly slavish personality.

    Really? I am the one going against the convention here. The convention created by commie lies, commies funded by globalist elites. How am I slavish?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  75. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    The White Europeans including their offshoots is where is now, still filthy rich (although always complaining), because of those hundreds of millions of people all over the world who were robbed and murdered, those who become victims of their very madness of colonialism and orientalism, of the crusades and the slave and Opium trades. Cathedrals and palaces, museums and theatres, train stations – all had been constructed on horrid foundations of bones and blood, and amalgamated by tears. There were so many centuries of plunder that the acts of looting the world for the sole benefit of the few, turned into inseparable part of the ‘Western existence and culture’, something that gets almost never addressed, let alone criticized.

    Opium trades.

    Opium War and looting by evil YT?
    Lets discuss it shall we

    You cannot discuss the opium trade without discussing the Iraqi Jewish Sassoon family, the big kingpins on the trade. There are still docks and hospitals named after this family in India.

    The truth lies buried in the family line of David Sassoon, “The Rothschilds of The Far East,” and their monopoly over the opium trade.

    Britain won Hong Kong by launching the opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an entire nation!

    David Sassoon was born in Baghdad in 1792. His father, Saleh Sassoon, was a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, the governor of Baghdad. (Thus making him the “court Jew” – a highly influential position.)

    In 1829 Ahmet was overthrown due to corruption and the Sassoon family fled to Bombay, India. This was the strategic trade route to interior India and the gateway to the Far East. In a brief time the British government granted Sassoon “monopoly rights” to all manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most important of all – Opium – then the most addictive drug in the world!

    The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major opium exchanges in China.

    According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: “He employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews. . . and put them to work.”

    Sassoon’s sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China.

    More about them here

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/04/11/the-magnificent-sassoons-raking-money-off-chinese-and-indian-misery-with-british-troops/

    http://www.ibtimes.co.in/chinas-opium-war-was-completely-indian-enterprise-not-british-indian-author-amitav-ghosh-628177

    China’s Opium War Was ‘Completely Indian Enterprise’, not British: Indian Author Amitav Ghosh

    At this juncture he found that the first opium war in China was an Indian undertaking. “The first opium war (was) planned in India, it was financed by Indian money, it was fought with Indian soldiers. But it has all completely vanished from our historical memory,” Ghosh, whose third book of Ibis series ‘Flood of Fire’ is all about migration in the 1830s, told IANS.

    “The putting together of the expeditionary force took place in India. The British naval ships for the expedition were accompanied by 50 supply ships, all provided for by Parsi merchants in Bombay (now Mumbai). From top to bottom, it was a completely Indian enterprise; all the wherewithal for it came from India,” he added.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    The White Europeans including their offshoots is where is now, still filthy rich (although always complaining), because of those hundreds of millions of people all over the world who were robbed and murdered, those who become victims of their very madness of colonialism and orientalism, of the crusades and the slave and Opium trades. Cathedrals and palaces, museums and theatres, train stations – all had been constructed on horrid foundations of bones and blood, and amalgamated by tears. There were so many centuries of plunder that the acts of looting the world for the sole benefit of the few, turned into inseparable part of the ‘Western existence and culture’, something that gets almost never addressed, let alone criticized.

    Who opposed the Opium trade?
    Why Evil YT ofcourse.

    From

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium#Prohibition_and_conflict_in_China

    The opium trade incurred intense enmity from the later British Prime Minister William Ewart Gladstone.[65] As a member of Parliament, Gladstone called it “most infamous and atrocious” referring to the opium trade between China and British India in particular.[66] Gladstone was fiercely against both of the Opium Wars Britain waged in China in the First Opium War initiated in 1840 and the Second Opium War initiated in 1857, denounced British violence against Chinese, and was ardently opposed to the British trade in opium to China.[67] Gladstone lambasted it as “Palmerston’s Opium War” and said that he felt “in dread of the judgments of God upon England for our national iniquity towards China” in May 1840.[68] A famous speech was made by Gladstone in Parliament against the First Opium War.[69][70] Gladstone criticized it as “a war more unjust in its origin, a war more calculated in its progress to cover this country with permanent disgrace”.[71] His hostility to opium stemmed from the effects of opium brought upon his sister Helen.[72] Due to the First Opium war brought on by Palmerston, there was initial reluctance to join the government of Peel on part of Gladstone before 1841.[73]

    Scientific evidence of the pernicious nature of opium use was largely undocumented in the 1890s, when Protestant missionaries in China decided to strengthen their opposition to the trade by compiling data which would demonstrate the harm the drug did. Faced with the problem that many Chinese associated Christianity with opium, partly due to the arrival of early Protestant missionaries on opium clippers, at the 1890 Shanghai Missionary Conference, they agreed to establish the Permanent Committee for the Promotion of Anti-Opium Societies in an attempt to overcome this problem and to arouse public opinion against the opium trade. The members of the committee were John Glasgow Kerr, MD, American Presbyterian Mission in Canton; B.C. Atterbury, MD, American Presbyterian Mission in Peking; Archdeacon Arthur E. Moule, Church Missionary Society in Shanghai; Henry Whitney, MD, American Board of Commissioners for foreign Missions in Foochow; the Rev. Samuel Clarke, China Inland Mission in Kweiyang; the Rev. Arthur Gostick Shorrock, English Baptist Mission in Taiyuan; and the Rev. Griffith John, London Mission Society in Hankow.[75] These missionaries were generally outraged over the British government’s Royal Commission on Opium visiting India but not China. Accordingly, the missionaries first organized the Anti-Opium League in China among their colleagues in every mission station in China. American missionary Hampden Coit DuBose acted as first president. This organization, which had elected national officers and held an annual national meeting, was instrumental in gathering data from every Western-trained medical doctor in China, which was then published as William Hector Park compiled Opinions of Over 100 Physicians on the Use of Opium in China (Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press, 1899). The vast majority of these medical doctors were missionaries; the survey also included doctors who were in private practices, particularly in Shanghai and Hong Kong, as well as Chinese who had been trained in medical schools in Western countries. In England, the home director of the China Inland Mission, Benjamin Broomhall, was an active opponent of the opium trade, writing two books to promote the banning of opium smoking: The Truth about Opium Smoking and The Chinese Opium Smoker. In 1888, Broomhall formed and became secretary of the Christian Union for the Severance of the British Empire with the Opium Traffic and editor of its periodical, National Righteousness. He lobbied the British Parliament to stop the opium trade. He and James Laidlaw Maxwell appealed to the London Missionary Conference of 1888 and the Edinburgh Missionary Conference of 1910 to condemn the continuation of the trade. When Broomhall was dying, his son Marshall read to him from The Times the welcome news that an agreement had been signed ensuring the end of the opium trade within two years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    The White Europeans including their offshoots is where is now, still filthy rich (although always complaining), because of those hundreds of millions of people all over the world who were robbed and murdered, those who become victims of their very madness of colonialism and orientalism, of the crusades and the slave and Opium trades. Cathedrals and palaces, museums and theatres, train stations – all had been constructed on horrid foundations of bones and blood, and amalgamated by tears. There were so many centuries of plunder that the acts of looting the world for the sole benefit of the few, turned into inseparable part of the ‘Western existence and culture’, something that gets almost never addressed, let alone criticized.

    slave trade

    Lets discuss this too.

    Check this out

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_Trade_Act_1807

    The Slave Trade Act 1807, officially the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act 1807,[1] abolished the slave trade in the British Empire, in particular the Atlantic slave trade, and also encouraged British action to press other European states to abolish their slave trades, but it did not abolish slavery itself. The United States, another major power involved in the Atlantic slave trade, passed the comparable Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves that same month, taking effect on 1 January 1808.

    The act was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed on 25 March 1807, with the title of “An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade”. The original act is in the Parliamentary Archives.

    Many of the supporters thought the Act would lead to the death of slavery, but it was not until 26 years later that slavery itself was actually abolished.

    And the Arabs still had black slaves upto 1962

    Watch from 4:01
    Rich Arabs Give Their Children Black Slaves As Birthday Gifts, black slaves kids carrying the books of their Arab master kids.

    And they would not have stopped it if the British, other Europeans and Americans had not forced them to.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_George_Gordon

    Moreover, considerable progress was made in the suppression of the slave trade.[104] Gordon wrote in a letter to his sister about the Africans living a “life of fear and misery”, but in spite of the “utter misery” of Equatoria that “I like this work”.[105] Gordon often personally intercepted slave convoys to arrest the slavers and break the chains of the slaves, but he found that the corrupt Egyptian bureaucrats usually sold the freed Africans back into slavery, and the expense of caring for thousands of freed slaves who were a long away from home burdensome.[106]

    During this period Gordon grew close to the Anti-Slavery Society, an evangelical Christian group based in London dedicated to ending slavery all over the world, and who regularly celebrated Gordon’s efforts to end slavery in the Sudan.[84] Urban wrote that: “Newspaper readers in Bolton or Beaminister had become enraged by stories about chained black children, cruelly abducted, being sold into slave markets…”, and Gordon’s anti-slavery efforts contributed to his image as a saintly man.[84]

    Gordon had come into conflict with the Egyptian governor of Khartoum and Sudan over his efforts to ban slavery.

    …snip….

    Governor-General of the Sudan[edit]
    As governor, Gordon faced a variety of challenges. Besides working to end slavery, Gordon carried out a series of reforms such as abolishing torture and public floggings where those opposed to the Egyptian state were flogged with a whip known as the kourbash made of buffalo hide

    Slavery was the basis of the Sudanese economy, and Gordon’s attempts to end the slave trade meant taking on very powerful vested interests, most notably Rahama Zobeir, known as the “King of the Slavers” as he was the richest and most powerful of all the slave traders in the entire Sudan. An insurrection had broken out in Darfur province led by associates of Zobeir and Gordon went to deal with it. The insurgents were numerous, and he saw that diplomacy had a better chance of success. On 2 September 1877, Gordon clad in the full gold-braided ceremonial blue uniform of the Governor-General of the Sudan and wearing the tarboush (the type of fez reserved for a pasha), accompanied by an interpreter and a few bashi-bazouks, rode unannounced into the enemy camp to discuss the situation.[115]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    You clearly suffer from a very deep seated inferiority complex.
     
    Please spare me your low IQ nonsense. I am just stating facts.
    I am human, I cannot fly as an eagle. I am just stating facts. Does this make me self hating?
    I was born as a human, without mechanical aid I cannot run as fast as a cheetah. Do I lose sleep over this? Do I hate myself over this? Do I dream of secretly being born a cheetah?
    It is you who are obsessed with White. You who are filled with hatred for White people. You need to see a psychiatrist.

    I bash liars and haters regardless of whether they are black like you or white like the majority here. How the hell does that make me a hater?

    You on the other hand have embraced hate with a passion. What makes you look so pathetic is your slavish identification with racists who hate your race.

    If anyone needs to see a psychiatrist it’s you. You are obviously a seriously f**ked up lowlife.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    I bash liars and haters regardless of whether they are black like you or white like the majority here. How the hell does that make me a hater?
     
    You should bash yourself then. LOL.

    You on the other hand have embraced hate with a passion. What makes you look so pathetic is your slavish identification with racists who hate your race.
     
    I have embraced truth. Most people in the brown world are racists. I know this for sure. We are all Nazis. The average Arab is a Nazi, the average Indian is a Nazi. Hitler was just trying to make Europeans like us Asians to ensure their survival, trying to kill of the universalist nature of European thinking for the more tribal nature common in the Middle East and the Subcontinent and many other parts of the world.
    The fact that I am supporting a race different than mine because I believe they have been wronged makes me not a racist.

    If anyone needs to see a psychiatrist it’s you.
     
    No, not really.I am great. You are an extreme case. You need to be put in a mental hospital ward ASAP.

    You are obviously a seriously f**ked up lowlife.
     
    LOL I live a great life, got a great easy high paying job. Most people who know me say I am intelligent, kind person. Well educated. .....
    You are a hateful shit. You boil in hatred in your pathetic life.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    The White Europeans including their offshoots is where is now, still filthy rich (although always complaining), because of those hundreds of millions of people all over the world who were robbed and murdered, those who become victims of their very madness of colonialism and orientalism, of the crusades and the slave and Opium trades. Cathedrals and palaces, museums and theatres, train stations – all had been constructed on horrid foundations of bones and blood, and amalgamated by tears. There were so many centuries of plunder that the acts of looting the world for the sole benefit of the few, turned into inseparable part of the ‘Western existence and culture’, something that gets almost never addressed, let alone criticized.

    Regarding slavery let us check this out

    From 00.00 minutes
    African kingdoms were major part in slavery. they did not stop slavery, Europeans did.
    The African soldier of the past proudly says they are a military people who sold slaves.
    at 06:52 African kings played a big role in the slave trade, many African kingdoms depended on slavery. Before Europeans landed in Africa, slavery was already in the system, it were slaves who worked for African kings.
    at 22:38 to 23:04 Ashanti made a lot of money on slavery
    at 30:04 Dahomey Kingdom was so warlike that other Africans had to make a venice like village in a lake to escape.
    at 31:30 the Dahohomey and neighbouring Kingdoms traded in slaves for ammunition. Dahomey themselves 1 million as slaves.
    the Dahomey even sacrificed their enemies, yes human sacrifice.
    At 33:20, the Dahomey were warlike, wars every year. Enemies were beheaded. Conquest and power and being greedy of power was considered a good thing for the King to have in Dahomey culture.
    At 34:50 Human sacrifice of enemy kings
    At 37:38 How much slavery was in the Dahomey kingdom
    At 45:15 a black guy of Benin said that the people sold into slavery were lucky or they would have been sacrificed, so slavery saved the lives of the blacks sold as slaves.

    At 14:40 to 16:20 minutes, slavery still going strong in the Sahara. It is traditional. Indeed the locals say, the Bela slaves love being slaves of the Tuareg. Wow. Lovely.

    Yeah rite, the West and Whites are uniquely evil. Yeah rite.
    If you think life was paradise before European colonialism, you have got to be thick.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Respect says:
    @Malla

    self-loathing Indian Malla
     
    LOL I love myself too much. Ask my friends. When I was younger, my friends complained that I was a bit narcissistic.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer,
     
    Hey if there were positive sides to the British Empire why not? Facts are facts.

    the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”.
     
    Many Indian nationalists admire Hitler because he was a nationalist. Tough guys. Tough nationalist guys admire him. They do not need your permission, a permission of a foreigner, to admire the people they wish to admire. You have the right to decide what they admire or not?

    What a pathetic creature…
     
    LOL anything is better than being the hateful piece of shit that you are.

    Malla

    As I understand european gypsies came to Europe about five or six centuries ago , they were expelled from India . Do you know why they were expelled from India ? . Thanks

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    As I understand european gypsies came to Europe about five or six centuries ago , they were expelled from India . Do you know why they were expelled from India ? . Thanks
     
    Hey I do not know much about this. Sorry. But in India there are gypsies too. Called Banjaras. So either these nomadic banjaras simply went West and became gypsies. Or they were escaping the Islamic conquests of India. This is the most I can say.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Anonymous[238] • Disclaimer says:
    @Stan d Mute

    They then taught these people to read and write their own language.
     
    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics. We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    The East Asians and Mesopotamians with their primitive pictographic languages at least managed to innovate an impressive amount given the limitations. Africans never innovated even the most basic of concepts like the wheel. Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.

    We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    Current research on Neandertals suggests they were more intelligent and less violent than the species that gradually absorbed them.

    Just something to keep in mind, along with the general concept of not blatting your fool mouth in loud and resplendent ignorance.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Anonymous[238] • Disclaimer says:
    @APilgrim
    If memory serves, the USA abortion death count since Roe-v-Wade is ~65M.

    Dead Black Babies are statistically the relative highest percentage, & close to the top numerically.

    When will the slaughter stop, and the DENIALS begin?

    If memory serves, the USA abortion death count since Roe-v-Wade is ~65M.

    Good, but not good enough.

    Dead Black Babies are statistically the relative highest percentage, & close to the top numerically.

    Better, but still not good enough.

    ZPG, and screw you dumbass religionists.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    The fewer criminal welfare affirmative action orcs* there are, the better for Whites.

    * also known as obsolete farm equipment
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Anonymous[238] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe Wong
    Well, the American can do better than a Jewess, the Americans even bombed, killed and waterboarded millions of people for decades on fabricated WMD allegations without provocation, wage an all out trade war by allege Chinese stealing their technologies without proof, while they are benefiting handsomely from Chinese supplied cheap and quality materials to maintain their living standard that they cannot afford themselves, etc.

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate ....

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate

    Then pack your bags and hit the road, Charlie Chan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Can't you see we are building a new world in China? And hopefully it will be the sample for others to follow to form a new world order. But the Anglo and their mentally colonized lackeys like Indian and unrepentant war criminal Japanese won't let it happen, otherwise their ugly past will not only be addressed but also be criticized. Perhaps George Bush, Dick Cheney, Barak Obama, and Tony Blair should be summoned to the ICC to be questioned as the first batch?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Respect says:
    @Malla

    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.
     
    LOL India is already going deep under Jewry as we speak.

    MODI APCO SHIN BET

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2018/03/27/modi-apco-shin-bet/

    A PR firm run by the ‘chosens’ handled Modi’s election campaign. Including the Shining Gujrat b.s.(Gujrat, the state where Modi was chief minister before becoming Prime Minister)

    Also, check out their outreach to (influence in) the Indian media.

    THE KOSHER “EDUCATION” OF INDIAN MEDIA

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/the-kosher-education-of-indian-media/

    Israeli security firms, closely connected to the Israeli Military, provide security to the Indian Parliament !

    UNIT 8200 ,SERAYET MATKAL AND INDIAS CYBER SECURITY

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/unit-8200-serayet-matkal-and-indias-cyber-security/

    Some notable Israeli companies (all closely connected to the Israeli Military) which deserve mention
    NICE Systems, (High Tech recording of the Indian Parliament )
    Akamai Technologies (Election Commission Of India Private mobile Handsets)
    ECI Telecom ,(ECI’s top position in the Indian transmission market, with 25% share of the country’s metro optical network hardware market.)

    Below we observe Hinjew Indians proudly announce how they are preparing to be good Goyim slaves to the Top Dog Jews

    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/mmnmmm.png
    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/admdsa.png
    https://wideawakegentile.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/randa-2.png

    As far as China

    CHINAS “REVOLUTIONARY” JEWS

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/jews-in-china-mao-era/

    CHINESE COMMUNISM? YES BUT IT WAS JEWISH WHEN IT STARTED

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/06/07/chinese-communism-yes-but-it-was-jewish-when-it-started/

    The money looted out of China during the Opium War was itself used to fund Mao and his CCP movement. The elites are deviously brilliant or what?

    Also
    HOW ISRAEL USED WEAPONS AND TECHNOLOGY TO BECOME AN ALLY OF CHINA

    https://www.newsweek.com/china-israel-military-technology-beijing-jerusalem-saul-eisenberg-weapons-607117

    Taking over the non White world will be much easier than you think. Lots of corrupt people, people who will sell anything for a few shekels.

    Godess Kali is going to punish India , for you unfaithfulness

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Godess Kali is going to punish India , for you unfaithfulness
     
    Goddess Kali is angry with our stupidity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Malla says:

    Hey check this out

    Slavery still strong in Yemen. Slavery of blacks.

    How rich is Yemen? Well it is one of the poorest countries in the world. but I thought slavery makes nations rich by modern standards? So why is Yemen poor even if has slaves?

    What is strange is that brainwashed commies like Jeo Wong or hateful losers like Bliss will waste their time hating Whitey, hating the West, trying to make Whitey feel bad because of slavery, but if they are so concerned about slavery, why do they not go to say Yemen and try to stop the practice? Try to do something good for a change and go to Yemen and do something good. Either you will free a couple of slaves and you guys will do good or you pussyboys will be shot at by some tough tribal Arabs. Both are good changes to this world. Look at that Englishmen Pasha Gordon, born an evil YT, he gave his life fighting slavery. But loser shits like Bliss sit behind their computers hating colonials like Gordon, when they are not even equal a man to Gordon’s fingernail.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  86. Malla says:
    @Respect
    Malla

    As I understand european gypsies came to Europe about five or six centuries ago , they were expelled from India . Do you know why they were expelled from India ? . Thanks

    As I understand european gypsies came to Europe about five or six centuries ago , they were expelled from India . Do you know why they were expelled from India ? . Thanks

    Hey I do not know much about this. Sorry. But in India there are gypsies too. Called Banjaras. So either these nomadic banjaras simply went West and became gypsies. Or they were escaping the Islamic conquests of India. This is the most I can say.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Gypsies may have left N India voluntarily after the Muslim conquest.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Malla says:
    @Bliss
    I bash liars and haters regardless of whether they are black like you or white like the majority here. How the hell does that make me a hater?

    You on the other hand have embraced hate with a passion. What makes you look so pathetic is your slavish identification with racists who hate your race.

    If anyone needs to see a psychiatrist it’s you. You are obviously a seriously f**ked up lowlife.

    I bash liars and haters regardless of whether they are black like you or white like the majority here. How the hell does that make me a hater?

    You should bash yourself then. LOL.

    You on the other hand have embraced hate with a passion. What makes you look so pathetic is your slavish identification with racists who hate your race.

    I have embraced truth. Most people in the brown world are racists. I know this for sure. We are all Nazis. The average Arab is a Nazi, the average Indian is a Nazi. Hitler was just trying to make Europeans like us Asians to ensure their survival, trying to kill of the universalist nature of European thinking for the more tribal nature common in the Middle East and the Subcontinent and many other parts of the world.
    The fact that I am supporting a race different than mine because I believe they have been wronged makes me not a racist.

    If anyone needs to see a psychiatrist it’s you.

    No, not really.I am great. You are an extreme case. You need to be put in a mental hospital ward ASAP.

    You are obviously a seriously f**ked up lowlife.

    LOL I live a great life, got a great easy high paying job. Most people who know me say I am intelligent, kind person. Well educated. …..
    You are a hateful shit. You boil in hatred in your pathetic life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    "Hitler was just trying to make Europeans like us Asians to ensure their survival,..."

    For someone so well informed and Knowledgeable maybe you should be a little bit more skeptical about Hitler.

    I don't need to "prove" it, because I 'm sure you know where the money that put Hitler into power came from , where the money that saved the nazi party in the 30's came from.

    Hitler was a great admirer of the British empire and you also know who we gave the world that empire.

    I'm trying to suggest that we have enough evidence to suggest that Hitler was a poodle in the hands of those who gave us the British empire, the I and II WW etc...

    The total destruction of Germany couldn't have been achieved with just a defeat by an external enemy.

    And Hitler and lots of high ranking nazis looked like members of the tribe.

    of course , I might be completely wrong , but anyway your admiration for the man is, at best, naive.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Malla says:
    @Respect
    Godess Kali is going to punish India , for you unfaithfulness

    Godess Kali is going to punish India , for you unfaithfulness

    Goddess Kali is angry with our stupidity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?
     
    Except those humans had nothing to do with present day blacks

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjpIqzGrFR8

    Assuming the Out of Africa theory is true (ASSUMING), those early modern humans were not like today’s black Negroid people. Black Negroid people did not even exist when those early humans left Africa.This belief that Africa is a black only continent is wrong as hell. There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.
    The Manot skull, one of the first human skulls found in the Middle East is already similar to European skulls.
    Indeed black Negroids have genes which is not found in other humans but the blacks got it from archaic primitive humanoids before modern humans even left Africa. In other words, these humans who left Africa did not carry this gene which blacks got 150,000 years ago!!! How is that possible if blacks (who did not look like today’s blacks but are the ancestors of Negroid blacks) are the ancestors of the population who left Africa. This population which left Africa was a distinct population from black Negroid and may already have looked European or at least Caucasiod.
    Negroids have greater genetic diversity because they have absorbed genes from more primitive humanoids. In other words, the population which left Africa was a population which had nothing to do with the ancestors of black negroids (who had not yet evolved/ devolved into Negroids by then).

    There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.

    Whadda silly moron, getting all excited about something that proves the opposite of what he thinks:

    https://www.mpg.de/research/hofmeyr-skull-supports-out-of-africa-theory

    Hofmeyr-Skull supports the “Out of Africa”-Theory
    Dating of skull delivers the first fossil indicator that modern humans evolved in Africa

    The surprising similarity between a fossil skull from the southernmost tip of Africa and similarly ancient skulls from Europe is in agreement with the genetics-based “Out of Africa” theory, which predicts that humans like those that inhabited Eurasia in the Upper Paleolithic should be found in sub-Saharan Africa around 36,000 years ago. The skull from South Africa provides the first fossil evidence in support of this prediction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    My God, I have come across a lot of idiots on this website. You top them all. What was the gist of my post?
    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today's black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans. Thousands of years before the bantu black was even formed, hell even before the Koi San were formed, there were Caucasian people living in Africa.
    Go through that video again. You did not understand it as you have, what we call in India, 'mund buddhi'. Basically you are thick.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. APilgrim says:
    @Stan d Mute

    the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers
     
    Of course it did. Look how the Catholic Church has betrayed white Catholics, the evangelical churches have betrayed white evangelicals, etc, ad nauseum.

    For all the awareness of Jewish manipulation around here, it’s absolutely astounding how stupid Christians are on the topic of the grandest manipulation foisted on their ancestors and which their ancestors foisted upon them. Too stupid to realize Tinkerbelle isn’t real, that it’s a retarded fable of desert dwelling morons, they suck it up like soy milkshakes. They have Faith that they are exactly the same as Africans (maybe they are on a cognitive level) because some desert rat’s desiccated scrolls tell them they’re all created in Tinkerbelle’s image.

    The stupidity of adhering to Neolithic sand myths in the Space Age is equalled only by the hypocrisy of blaming the Jews for all our troubles while worshippers a Jew god. Meanwhile, they mock moron Mormans for believing the exact same stupidity (lone nutcase on a mountain talking to himself) with the sole addition of an alien planet named Kolob.

    If we truly are too stupid to shrug off this yoke of imbecility, I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.

    Fortunately, I have a sense of humor and delight in the knowledge that the Jews will be the first to go and entirely as a result of their own dissembling nonsense. Booble Thumping Christians will be next and once they’re gone the inbred low IQ Hinpoohs won’t stand a chance. The poor Buttists will see it coming, but by then the tsunami will be unstoppable. Goodbye Civilization. See you again in another 70,000 years perhaps...

    By the reckoning of Stan d Mute,

    Jesus of Nazareth was the biggest dupe of all human history.

    Moses was a ‘desert rat’.

    Neanderthals had low IQs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. Respect says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Destroying the most capable group in the world may be the objective, out of revenge, and/or in an effort to control the world.
    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    Weird people, jews.
    The German Sarrazin, former member of the Board of the Bundesbank, the German Fed, outstanding economist, former senator of Berlin, in 2010 wrote a book on how immigration destroys Germany, by importing stupidity.
    Merkel fired him immediately.
    His next book was about the euro disaster.
    Now a book by him on the dangers of Islam has appeared.
    A Dutch jewish journalist, Joshua Livestro, writes that the book should be forbidden.

    Unable to understand writings like this, do not people like this Joshua see that Muslims are not friends of jews ?
    Or is it that the nationalism of men like Sarrazin is seen as the greater evil for jews ?

    https://tpo.nl/2018/08/30/dit-nieuwe-boek-van-thilo-sarrazin-moet-volgens-joshua-livestro-worden-verboden/

    Why Holland does not repatriate the boers ?? , or Merkel . Central Europe is full of muslims , and you don`t repatriate boers ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. Malla says:
    @Bliss
    Lol at this black wannabe nordicist.

    Here’s what the British saw you as:

    https://dreamofacity.com/2016/12/19/bowbazar-to-former-black-town-calcutta/

    Calcutta in its heyday was divided into two main districts – White Town, which was where the British and other Europeans lived their lives and did their business, and Black Town, which was where the local Bengalis resided.

    In between White Town and Black Town, a kind of “grey area” emerged; a district in which everyone who was neither British nor Bengali were housed. Here in the area generally known as Bowbazar, one found Calcutta’s Chinatown, Muslim and Jewish Quarters, as well as communities of Buddhists, Parsis, Ismailis, Portuguese-Eurasians and Anglo-Indians.

    So?
    Bengalis range in skin colour from light brown to extremely dark brown. But to a Northern Euro White person even a light brown Caucasoid subcontinental may seem as black. So they called the part of the city where Bengalis lived as blacktown. Makes perfect logical sense to me. To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    Most Hindus avoid contact with all non Hindus. Europeans, Africans, East Asians you name it. They are called Mleccha, or barbarians. So Europeans were not unique in this.

    What are you exactly trying to prove here? That I consider myself a wannabe White? You can go through all my comments on Unz, NOWHERE do I show this sentiment.
    Were the Europeans who took the side of blacks in their abolition of slavery called wannabe blacks?
    What is wrong with you head? Why don’t you pour some water on it? It might increase your IQ a bit, maybe to 32.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

     

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks the Arabs call themselves as White. It is all relative.
    , @Bliss

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.
     
    It was only the natives of India, regardless of caste, who lived in Black Town, Calcutta. The non-European MENA types, the mixed race Anglo-Indians, the Chinese etc lived in between Black Town and White Town. In South Africa Indians were originally lumped with Black Africans until the London-educated lawyer Gandhi agitated for separation from african “kaffirs”.

    Indians are called blacks even by the dark skinned Malays of Southeast Asia. In Chinese Buddhist scripture Bodhidharma, the founder of the Chan sect (Zen in Japan) is described as “the black faced bhikshu”. Here’s Saint Francis Xavier describing the Brahmins of India:

    https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543xavier1.asp

    the Indians being black themselves, consider their own color the best, they believe that their gods are black. On this account the great majority of their idols are as black as black can be
    , @Stan d Mute
    https://youtu.be/BV-ASc0qkrM
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. peterAUS says:
    @republic
    Not a very good article. This writer's race caused a lot of the problems the Boers today are facing in South Africa.

    Before he died in 2002, the late great white nationalist, Dr. Pierce gave a lot of speeches which are still available today on the real reasons for why the last white government gave up its rule in SA.

    The lesson of South Africa

    said among other things that the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers, also the jews were pumping spiritual poison into the White population urging them to surrender rather than fight. But Pierce said it was the betrayal by the Boer establishment- the Boer politicians and church leaders and big businessmen which sealed the fate of South Africa

    …. the betrayal by the Boer establishment- the Boer politicians and church leaders and big businessmen..

    Don’t say……

    Also, sounds familiar.

    Ah, yes, but this time, and PLACE, it will be different.
    The HOPE.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.
     
    Whadda silly moron, getting all excited about something that proves the opposite of what he thinks:

    https://www.mpg.de/research/hofmeyr-skull-supports-out-of-africa-theory

    Hofmeyr-Skull supports the "Out of Africa"-Theory
    Dating of skull delivers the first fossil indicator that modern humans evolved in Africa


    The surprising similarity between a fossil skull from the southernmost tip of Africa and similarly ancient skulls from Europe is in agreement with the genetics-based "Out of Africa" theory, which predicts that humans like those that inhabited Eurasia in the Upper Paleolithic should be found in sub-Saharan Africa around 36,000 years ago. The skull from South Africa provides the first fossil evidence in support of this prediction.

    My God, I have come across a lot of idiots on this website. You top them all. What was the gist of my post?
    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans. Thousands of years before the bantu black was even formed, hell even before the Koi San were formed, there were Caucasian people living in Africa.
    Go through that video again. You did not understand it as you have, what we call in India, ‘mund buddhi’. Basically you are thick.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
    Pro tip: Ron has gifted us with an “ignore commenter” feature.
    , @Bliss

    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans.
     
    You drooling retard, modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent. What kind of an utterly clueless idiot are you to claim they had nothing in common?

    All humans in Africa and outside Africa have African human ancestors. Therefore alll races of mankind can be traced back to africans. Why is it such an exciting surprise for you to learn that Europeans are descended from humans in the Deep South of Africa? The Hofmeyr skull just confirms what genetics already revealed.

    Btw, the Hofmeyr skull predates european Cheddar man by over 25,000 years. Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot...

    https://news.nationalgeographic.com/content/dam/news/2018/02/07/cheddar-man-reconstruction/01-cheddar-man-Credit-Channel-4-Plimsol-Productions-2.adapt.1900.1.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. peterAUS says:
    @TG
    The white minority government of South Africa DID do something evil... it just never gets mentioned.

    They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked. But in the long run, poverty and political stability do not go together...

    South Africa used to be pretty prosperous, even with apartheid the blacks were doing not so bad. And of course, the fertility rate was pretty low, for blacks and whites alike. If the government had just let the people alone, perhaps they could have come to some sort of accommodation. But no, the elites - first white, then black - wanted their cheap labor. So the population of South Africa was deliberately tripled from about 20 million to about 60 million and climbing... and native blacks protesting this abusive open borders cheap-labor immigration policy, are slandered as 'racist.' Of course.

    But we can't talk about how governments forcing population increases against the will of the general public drives wages down... no, that is taboo.

    …They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked.

    and

    But we can’t talk about how governments forcing population increases against the will of the general public drives wages down… no, that is taboo.

    Yup.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Malla says:
    @Malla
    So?
    Bengalis range in skin colour from light brown to extremely dark brown. But to a Northern Euro White person even a light brown Caucasoid subcontinental may seem as black. So they called the part of the city where Bengalis lived as blacktown. Makes perfect logical sense to me. To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    Most Hindus avoid contact with all non Hindus. Europeans, Africans, East Asians you name it. They are called Mleccha, or barbarians. So Europeans were not unique in this.

    What are you exactly trying to prove here? That I consider myself a wannabe White? You can go through all my comments on Unz, NOWHERE do I show this sentiment.
    Were the Europeans who took the side of blacks in their abolition of slavery called wannabe blacks?
    What is wrong with you head? Why don't you pour some water on it? It might increase your IQ a bit, maybe to 32.

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks the Arabs call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Bliss says:
    @Bliss
    Lol at this black wannabe nordicist.

    Here’s what the British saw you as:

    https://dreamofacity.com/2016/12/19/bowbazar-to-former-black-town-calcutta/

    Calcutta in its heyday was divided into two main districts – White Town, which was where the British and other Europeans lived their lives and did their business, and Black Town, which was where the local Bengalis resided.

    In between White Town and Black Town, a kind of “grey area” emerged; a district in which everyone who was neither British nor Bengali were housed. Here in the area generally known as Bowbazar, one found Calcutta’s Chinatown, Muslim and Jewish Quarters, as well as communities of Buddhists, Parsis, Ismailis, Portuguese-Eurasians and Anglo-Indians.

    So British apartheid was practiced in India more than a century before it was officially introduced in South Africa.

    Btw, many Indians and Malays were also shipped to South Africa as slaves. And after slavery was abolished in the 19th century, as indentured servants:

    https://mediadiversified.org/2016/05/18/where-were-south-africas-slaves-from/

    In the early years, 80% of slaves to South Africa came from India (this included Sri Lanka). Slaves would continue to be brought from India, but over the years other regions of the world also gained importance.

    Records indicate slaves as also originating from West and Central Africa, with places of origin often collectively referred to as the Guinea coast, but specifically including the Cape Verde Islands, Burkina Faso, Benin, Congo, Angola, and also Zanzibar and Ethiopia (Abyssinia).

    Outside of Africa slaves were from: Siam (Thailand), Persia (Iran), Arabia (north Africa and the Arabian Peninsula), Brazil, Burma, China, Japan, Borneo, Timor and Vietnam, amongst other origins. There are also mentions of Tagal, possibly pointing to Filipinos who spoke Tagalog.

    So slaves from as far away as China, Japan, Vietnam and Philippines also ended up in European colonies in Africa. Later of course, after slavery was abolished and replaced by indentured servitude, it was overwhelmingly asians (Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos etc) who were imported to white colonies to do the work previously done by slaves.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Joe Wong says:
    @Anonymous

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate
     
    Then pack your bags and hit the road, Charlie Chan.

    Can’t you see we are building a new world in China? And hopefully it will be the sample for others to follow to form a new world order. But the Anglo and their mentally colonized lackeys like Indian and unrepentant war criminal Japanese won’t let it happen, otherwise their ugly past will not only be addressed but also be criticized. Perhaps George Bush, Dick Cheney, Barak Obama, and Tony Blair should be summoned to the ICC to be questioned as the first batch?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Can’t you see we are building a new world in China? And hopefully it will be the sample for others to follow to form a new world order.
     
    Can I see it? Yes, I can. And it looks very much like a revised, revitalized, newly-disguised variation of the soul-destroying feudalism that was "old China". Which means it's not all that much different from the foully-corrupt monstrosity that is the USA. Call it 30 years away?

    The hugely overpopulated world that is now on the horizon will be a horror-show for humanity like no other. China ain't no Camelot -- countries that are run by oligarchs paying people $1 an hour for 12-hour work-days are not shining examples of anything but monstrous inhumanity. But, like I said, not really much different from the USA.

    There are some very bad people in the world, and they need hanging, ASAP. The media -- the most disgusting component of the show -- keeps the masses deceived. All should hang -- government, oligarchs, media.

    Perhaps George Bush, Dick Cheney, Barak Obama, and Tony Blair should be summoned to the ICC to be questioned as the first batch?
     
    You tie their hands, I'll throw the trapdoor release.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    The White Europeans including their offshoots is where is now, still filthy rich (although always complaining), because of those hundreds of millions of people all over the world who were robbed and murdered, those who become victims of their very madness of colonialism and orientalism, of the crusades and the slave and Opium trades. Cathedrals and palaces, museums and theatres, train stations – all had been constructed on horrid foundations of bones and blood, and amalgamated by tears. There were so many centuries of plunder that the acts of looting the world for the sole benefit of the few, turned into inseparable part of the ‘Western existence and culture’, something that gets almost never addressed, let alone criticized.

    Many of those cathedrals were built before colonialism even began

    This is the Lincoln Cathedral in Lincoln, England. Building commenced in 1072 and continued in several phases throughout the medieval period. It was the tallest building in the world for 238 years (1311–1549). It was the first building in the world taller than the Great Pyramid of Giza. But even then it was not the largest cathedral in England, York Cathedral was even larger.
    This was built before colonialism even began. And there are loads of such cathedrals in Europe before 1600.

    Also Haiti, the poor shithole carribean country too was a colonial power. After genociding the French Whites on that island (except a few Germans and Poles) they colonized the Dominican Republic. The Dominican Republic celebrates their independence day from Haiti. So why is Haiti with its colonial history not rich?

    https://www.officeholidays.com/countries/dominican_republic/independence-day.php

    This public holiday is always celebrated on 27 February.
    It is the Dominican Republic’s National Day and it commemorates independence from Haiti in 1844.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Peasant
    Kind sir,

    I put you forward for commenter of the month. I have never seen so many informative comments from one commenter in such a short period of time.

    Bravo!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Joe Wong says:
    @Malla

    they hate people different from they
     
    I guess most people in the world are like that.

    they hate people have independent mind
     
    People brainwashed by commies do not have independent minds.

    Why do you hate commies so much? Is it because they have different minds than yours? Or the communism make your way of life, ‘capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism’ appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Or the communism make your way of life, ‘capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism’ appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?
     
    Communism is not the enemy of Capitalism. It is a system financed and supported by big banking elites because in this system the government gets maximum power over the people, something the elites like and want to implement on the entire world. You do not own anything yourself, you do not own your own house, you do not own your own cloths. You are basically not human but a slave automon.
    I am all for socialism. Not Communism.
    Besides that, Communists are experts in brainwashing.
    Check out this book. Maybe some of these techniques have been used on you.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/03/04/communism-in-romania-the-anti-humans-by-dumitru-bacu/

    http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pdf_books/antihumans.pdf
    The Anti-Humans: Student Re-education in Romanian Prisons by Dumitru Bacu
    Those who do this to others are not really humans.

    The Black Book of Communism
    https://archive.org/download/TheBlackBookofCommunism10/the-black-book-of-communism-jean-louis-margolin-1999-communism.pdf
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Bliss says:
    @Malla
    So?
    Bengalis range in skin colour from light brown to extremely dark brown. But to a Northern Euro White person even a light brown Caucasoid subcontinental may seem as black. So they called the part of the city where Bengalis lived as blacktown. Makes perfect logical sense to me. To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    Most Hindus avoid contact with all non Hindus. Europeans, Africans, East Asians you name it. They are called Mleccha, or barbarians. So Europeans were not unique in this.

    What are you exactly trying to prove here? That I consider myself a wannabe White? You can go through all my comments on Unz, NOWHERE do I show this sentiment.
    Were the Europeans who took the side of blacks in their abolition of slavery called wannabe blacks?
    What is wrong with you head? Why don't you pour some water on it? It might increase your IQ a bit, maybe to 32.

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    It was only the natives of India, regardless of caste, who lived in Black Town, Calcutta. The non-European MENA types, the mixed race Anglo-Indians, the Chinese etc lived in between Black Town and White Town. In South Africa Indians were originally lumped with Black Africans until the London-educated lawyer Gandhi agitated for separation from african “kaffirs”.

    Indians are called blacks even by the dark skinned Malays of Southeast Asia. In Chinese Buddhist scripture Bodhidharma, the founder of the Chan sect (Zen in Japan) is described as “the black faced bhikshu”. Here’s Saint Francis Xavier describing the Brahmins of India:

    https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543xavier1.asp

    the Indians being black themselves, consider their own color the best, they believe that their gods are black. On this account the great majority of their idols are as black as black can be

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Oh, you are an afrocentrist.
    If we are black like Africans, why did Idi Amin kick us out of Uganda?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-i0JVip9N4

    Why did that gorilla steal all the wealth we had created with hard work?

    Indians vary in skin colour from light brown to even White to jet black.

    From Dark brown

    http://pavementpieces.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/11357951943_79b03aeb98_n.jpg

    http://bermudasun.bm/Images/Images/160862.jpg

    to light brown

    http://www.matrimonymanagement.com/image/wed11.jpg

    http://www.ekroopvivah.com/theme/Default/img/banner.jpg

    What are you exactly trying to prove?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Anonymous[218] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe Wong
    Can't you see we are building a new world in China? And hopefully it will be the sample for others to follow to form a new world order. But the Anglo and their mentally colonized lackeys like Indian and unrepentant war criminal Japanese won't let it happen, otherwise their ugly past will not only be addressed but also be criticized. Perhaps George Bush, Dick Cheney, Barak Obama, and Tony Blair should be summoned to the ICC to be questioned as the first batch?

    Can’t you see we are building a new world in China? And hopefully it will be the sample for others to follow to form a new world order.

    Can I see it? Yes, I can. And it looks very much like a revised, revitalized, newly-disguised variation of the soul-destroying feudalism that was “old China”. Which means it’s not all that much different from the foully-corrupt monstrosity that is the USA. Call it 30 years away?

    The hugely overpopulated world that is now on the horizon will be a horror-show for humanity like no other. China ain’t no Camelot — countries that are run by oligarchs paying people $1 an hour for 12-hour work-days are not shining examples of anything but monstrous inhumanity. But, like I said, not really much different from the USA.

    There are some very bad people in the world, and they need hanging, ASAP. The media — the most disgusting component of the show — keeps the masses deceived. All should hang — government, oligarchs, media.

    Perhaps George Bush, Dick Cheney, Barak Obama, and Tony Blair should be summoned to the ICC to be questioned as the first batch?

    You tie their hands, I’ll throw the trapdoor release.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Malla says:

    So British apartheid was practiced in India more than a century before it was officially introduced in South Africa.

    The British did not practice apartheid in South Africa, you stupid mund buddhi monkey, Apartheid was mostly an Afrikanner thing.

    http://www.williamdalrymple.uk.com/books/white-mughals

    Apartheid in India? Read the book White Mughals you hateful monkey, 30% or early colonial Europeans in India married Indian women. There were several cases of Europeans going native, wearing Indian cloths, listening to Indian music, living like Indians during the early colonial period. Of Europeans converting to Islam and becoming scholars of Islam, of Europeans living like Hindus (Hindoo Stuart). What apartheid are you babbling about? Of East India Company men sitting with Hindu Pundits and Islamic Scholars and discussing astronomy, philosophy, poetry….

    Also in many Indian armies like the Marathas, Tipu Sultan, there were loads of European mercenaries mostly in the artillery division. What apartheid?

    Hey talking of slavery, why are you not in Yemen yet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    In the late 18th Century, when Delhi was being plagued by invaders, Lucknow's fortunes were on the rise under the Nawabs of Awadh, a relatively new dynasty. Nawab means a kind of Duke, semi independent aristocrat in India. The Nawabs often imitated Mughal practices to gain legitimacy. The poet Mir Muhammad Taqi who came to Lucknow as a refugee from Delhi in 1782. Although Mir was welcomed by the Nawab of Awadh, who even paid for his journey from Delhi, the poet was never able to reconcile himself to exile from the ravaged Mughal capital. Mir's predecessor at the Lucknow Court had been the poet Sauda, known for his caustic wit and satires on contemporary events. Sauda was patronised by the Nawab Shuja-ud-daula and his successor Asaf-ud-daula, and it was through this connection that the poet met Richard Johnson, the British Assistant Resident who is supposed to have known Urdu and who enjoyed its poetry. At the very end of his life, Sauda presented Johnson with a manuscript of his collected verse, as a mark of high honour, a graceful tribute across cultural boundaries.

    During the 1780s, there was a particular interest in the translations of the great Hindu epics, which were promoted by the Sanskrit scholar Sir William Jones, who founded the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Another connoisseur in Lucknow was Major General Claude Martin, whose library contained a number of important works including Seir Mutaquerin; The Code of Gentoo [Hindu] Laws, from a Persian translation from the original Sanskrit; The Hitopadesa, Fables and Proverbs from the Sanskrit, and "Sacontala" or the Fatal Ring, translated from the original Sanskrit and Prakrit.

    Descriptions by visiting foreigners present delightful glimpses of cultural exchange in the tolerant period of late 18th Century Lucknow. Mrs. Elizabeth Plowden entertains the Nawab at dinner with a number of English songs. The Mughal prince, Mir Sulaiman Shikuh, who was Insha's patron, is heard reading in English a poem translated from the Persian and the English artist Ozias Humphrey sees Asaf-ud-daula teaching his young son to write Arabic and Persian words.

    What kind of Apartheid is this?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @Malla
    My God, I have come across a lot of idiots on this website. You top them all. What was the gist of my post?
    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today's black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans. Thousands of years before the bantu black was even formed, hell even before the Koi San were formed, there were Caucasian people living in Africa.
    Go through that video again. You did not understand it as you have, what we call in India, 'mund buddhi'. Basically you are thick.

    Pro tip: Ron has gifted us with an “ignore commenter” feature.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    I would like to take this idiot on. But thanks for the tip bud.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @Malla
    So?
    Bengalis range in skin colour from light brown to extremely dark brown. But to a Northern Euro White person even a light brown Caucasoid subcontinental may seem as black. So they called the part of the city where Bengalis lived as blacktown. Makes perfect logical sense to me. To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    Most Hindus avoid contact with all non Hindus. Europeans, Africans, East Asians you name it. They are called Mleccha, or barbarians. So Europeans were not unique in this.

    What are you exactly trying to prove here? That I consider myself a wannabe White? You can go through all my comments on Unz, NOWHERE do I show this sentiment.
    Were the Europeans who took the side of blacks in their abolition of slavery called wannabe blacks?
    What is wrong with you head? Why don't you pour some water on it? It might increase your IQ a bit, maybe to 32.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    LOL.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.
     
    It was only the natives of India, regardless of caste, who lived in Black Town, Calcutta. The non-European MENA types, the mixed race Anglo-Indians, the Chinese etc lived in between Black Town and White Town. In South Africa Indians were originally lumped with Black Africans until the London-educated lawyer Gandhi agitated for separation from african “kaffirs”.

    Indians are called blacks even by the dark skinned Malays of Southeast Asia. In Chinese Buddhist scripture Bodhidharma, the founder of the Chan sect (Zen in Japan) is described as “the black faced bhikshu”. Here’s Saint Francis Xavier describing the Brahmins of India:

    https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543xavier1.asp

    the Indians being black themselves, consider their own color the best, they believe that their gods are black. On this account the great majority of their idols are as black as black can be

    Oh, you are an afrocentrist.
    If we are black like Africans, why did Idi Amin kick us out of Uganda?

    Why did that gorilla steal all the wealth we had created with hard work?

    Indians vary in skin colour from light brown to even White to jet black.

    From Dark brown

    to light brown

    What are you exactly trying to prove?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I'm glad you didn't put pictures of Hijras up again, Bro, I just ate; except the last one.
    , @Bliss
    Almost all Indians range from jet black to dark brown. ASI is black and every Indian has it. Most Indians are majority ASI.

    The most famous Indian of modern times, Gandhi, was stereotypically Indian:

    https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51hbri7jg8L._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

    The most famous female Indian saint of recent times with the Father of indian rocketry and President of India:

    http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories/2016September/ammamos-2_092716033244.jpg

    The founder of the Hare Krishna movement:

    https://www.vrindavan-dham.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/prabhupada_321.jpg

    The founder of the Transcendental Meditation (TM) movement:

    http://www.tm-africa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MMY2.jpg

    Brahmin priests:

    https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/sri-vadapathira-kaliamman-hindu-temple-hindu-brahmin-priests-picture-id929269750

    Brahmin Prime Minister:

    https://c8.alamy.com/comp/BHY6RN/shri-p-v-narasimha-rao-prime-minister-of-india-11-november-1991-BHY6RN.jpg

    India’s best runner:

    https://drop.ndtv.com/albums/NEWS/ptusha/pt4new.jpg

    India’s top music composer:

    https://www.sbs.com.au/movies/sites/sbs.com.au.film/files/01_pc_0023.jpg
    , @Joe Wong
    These are Photoshop doctored photos; Indians are either jet black or dark brown.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. Malla says:
    @Stan d Mute
    https://youtu.be/BV-ASc0qkrM

    LOL.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Malla says:
    @Stan d Mute
    Pro tip: Ron has gifted us with an “ignore commenter” feature.

    I would like to take this idiot on. But thanks for the tip bud.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. @Bragadocious
    What's funny about the dancing video is that the British press is completely obsessed with it, while ignoring her damaging and lethal comments about land confiscation. In other words, the Brits love to chatter about optics and social faux pas, proving yet again that they're highly overrated as a so-called thinking peoples.

    At this stage Britain is richly deserving of their fate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    Why do you hate commies so much? Is it because they have different minds than yours? Or the communism make your way of life, 'capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism' appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?

    Or the communism make your way of life, ‘capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism’ appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?

    Communism is not the enemy of Capitalism. It is a system financed and supported by big banking elites because in this system the government gets maximum power over the people, something the elites like and want to implement on the entire world. You do not own anything yourself, you do not own your own house, you do not own your own cloths. You are basically not human but a slave automon.
    I am all for socialism. Not Communism.
    Besides that, Communists are experts in brainwashing.
    Check out this book. Maybe some of these techniques have been used on you.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/03/04/communism-in-romania-the-anti-humans-by-dumitru-bacu/

    http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pdf_books/antihumans.pdf

    The Anti-Humans: Student Re-education in Romanian Prisons by Dumitru Bacu
    Those who do this to others are not really humans.

    The Black Book of Communism

    https://archive.org/download/TheBlackBookofCommunism10/the-black-book-of-communism-jean-louis-margolin-1999-communism.pdf

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA cold war version of Communism. Communism is about producers having bigger say about the distribution of what they produced and the equality of the society.

    So far communism has been implemented badly due to the adverse circumstances and poor quality of the participants. You should not put out verdict too early because of bad precedents unless you are brain washed by other ideology and does not have the capacity of open mindedness. This also apply to democracy, though democracy has been hijacked by the Western imperialists as a facade to cover their crimes, but given the right condition, democracy can be beneficial to be human beings just like communism.
    , @Malla
    I forgot to add this book. A must read.

    https://holodomorinfo.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/gulag_archipelago_i_text.pdf
    https://holodomorfacts.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/gulag_archipelago_ii_text.pdf
    https://holodomorinfo.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/gulag_archipelago_iii_text.pdf

    The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Malla says:
    @Malla

    So British apartheid was practiced in India more than a century before it was officially introduced in South Africa.
     
    The British did not practice apartheid in South Africa, you stupid mund buddhi monkey, Apartheid was mostly an Afrikanner thing.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:White_Mughals.jpg

    http://www.williamdalrymple.uk.com/books/white-mughals

    Apartheid in India? Read the book White Mughals you hateful monkey, 30% or early colonial Europeans in India married Indian women. There were several cases of Europeans going native, wearing Indian cloths, listening to Indian music, living like Indians during the early colonial period. Of Europeans converting to Islam and becoming scholars of Islam, of Europeans living like Hindus (Hindoo Stuart). What apartheid are you babbling about? Of East India Company men sitting with Hindu Pundits and Islamic Scholars and discussing astronomy, philosophy, poetry....

    Also in many Indian armies like the Marathas, Tipu Sultan, there were loads of European mercenaries mostly in the artillery division. What apartheid?

    Hey talking of slavery, why are you not in Yemen yet.

    In the late 18th Century, when Delhi was being plagued by invaders, Lucknow’s fortunes were on the rise under the Nawabs of Awadh, a relatively new dynasty. Nawab means a kind of Duke, semi independent aristocrat in India. The Nawabs often imitated Mughal practices to gain legitimacy. The poet Mir Muhammad Taqi who came to Lucknow as a refugee from Delhi in 1782. Although Mir was welcomed by the Nawab of Awadh, who even paid for his journey from Delhi, the poet was never able to reconcile himself to exile from the ravaged Mughal capital. Mir’s predecessor at the Lucknow Court had been the poet Sauda, known for his caustic wit and satires on contemporary events. Sauda was patronised by the Nawab Shuja-ud-daula and his successor Asaf-ud-daula, and it was through this connection that the poet met Richard Johnson, the British Assistant Resident who is supposed to have known Urdu and who enjoyed its poetry. At the very end of his life, Sauda presented Johnson with a manuscript of his collected verse, as a mark of high honour, a graceful tribute across cultural boundaries.

    During the 1780s, there was a particular interest in the translations of the great Hindu epics, which were promoted by the Sanskrit scholar Sir William Jones, who founded the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Another connoisseur in Lucknow was Major General Claude Martin, whose library contained a number of important works including Seir Mutaquerin; The Code of Gentoo [Hindu] Laws, from a Persian translation from the original Sanskrit; The Hitopadesa, Fables and Proverbs from the Sanskrit, and “Sacontala” or the Fatal Ring, translated from the original Sanskrit and Prakrit.

    Descriptions by visiting foreigners present delightful glimpses of cultural exchange in the tolerant period of late 18th Century Lucknow. Mrs. Elizabeth Plowden entertains the Nawab at dinner with a number of English songs. The Mughal prince, Mir Sulaiman Shikuh, who was Insha’s patron, is heard reading in English a poem translated from the Persian and the English artist Ozias Humphrey sees Asaf-ud-daula teaching his young son to write Arabic and Persian words.

    What kind of Apartheid is this?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. Malla says:

    And let us check out Amy Wilson Carmichael.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Carmichael

    Amy Wilson Carmichael (16 December 1867 – 18 January 1951) was a Protestant Christian missionary in India, who opened an orphanage and founded a mission in Dohnavur. She served in India for 55 years without furlough and wrote many books about the missionary work there.

    Carmichael’s fellowship transformed Dohnavur into a sanctuary for over one thousand children who would otherwise have faced a bleak future.[4] Carmichael often said that her Ministry of rescuing temple children started with a girl named Preena. Having become a temple servant against her wishes, Preena managed to escape. Amy Carmichael provided her shelter and withstood the threats of those who insisted that the girl be returned either to the temple directly to continue her sexual assignments, or to her family for more indirect return to the temple. The number of such incidents soon grew, thus beginning Amy Carmichael’s new Ministry.[5] When the children were asked what drew them to Amy, they most often replied “It was love. Amma (They’re refferring to Amy as their mother; Amma means mother) loved us.”[6]

    Respecting Indian culture, members of the organization wore Indian dress and gave the rescued children Indian names. Carmichael herself dressed in Indian clothes, dyed her skin with dark coffee, and often traveled long distances on India’s hot, dusty roads to save just one child from suffering.

    In 1912 Queen Mary recognized the missionary’s work, and helped fund a hospital at Dohnavur.[7] By 1913, the Dohnavur Fellowship was serving 130 girls. In 1918, Dohnavur added a home for young boys, many born to the former temple prostitutes. Meanwhile, in 1916 Carmichael formed a Protestant religious order called Sisters of the Common Life.

    What apartheid? And there were many like her. How many black Africans have done something like this for us?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lockean Proviso
    The Left have a trendy phrase for white persons like Amy Carmichael: "white savior". Such coinages serve to forestall inconvenient thinking or recognition of moral nobility and nuance. The neo-Marxists recognize the power of pseudo-intellectual jargon, particularly to the young, as it stereotypes, provides a short circuit to propaganda, and adds radical chic. Many youth want to sound hip and to not be left out (FOMO), so they delegate their thinking to those who spoon-feed them the vocabulary of self-hate and contempt for rational debate ("white fragility") and for enemies of The Narrative.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Joe Wong says:
    @Malla

    Or the communism make your way of life, ‘capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism’ appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?
     
    Communism is not the enemy of Capitalism. It is a system financed and supported by big banking elites because in this system the government gets maximum power over the people, something the elites like and want to implement on the entire world. You do not own anything yourself, you do not own your own house, you do not own your own cloths. You are basically not human but a slave automon.
    I am all for socialism. Not Communism.
    Besides that, Communists are experts in brainwashing.
    Check out this book. Maybe some of these techniques have been used on you.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/03/04/communism-in-romania-the-anti-humans-by-dumitru-bacu/

    http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pdf_books/antihumans.pdf
    The Anti-Humans: Student Re-education in Romanian Prisons by Dumitru Bacu
    Those who do this to others are not really humans.

    The Black Book of Communism
    https://archive.org/download/TheBlackBookofCommunism10/the-black-book-of-communism-jean-louis-margolin-1999-communism.pdf

    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA cold war version of Communism. Communism is about producers having bigger say about the distribution of what they produced and the equality of the society.

    So far communism has been implemented badly due to the adverse circumstances and poor quality of the participants. You should not put out verdict too early because of bad precedents unless you are brain washed by other ideology and does not have the capacity of open mindedness. This also apply to democracy, though democracy has been hijacked by the Western imperialists as a facade to cover their crimes, but given the right condition, democracy can be beneficial to be human beings just like communism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA
     
    You will be surprised to know how much the CIA (and the OSS before them) has actually helped in spreading communism around the world.
    The USA helped create the People's Republic of China. Wall Street bankers were behind Lenin and his gang. The USA also brought Castro to power in Cuba.
    This whole thing is a big scam, a game, a kabuki play. There is no Communism vs Capitalism. Both are arms of the same monster.

    Western imperialists
     
    There are no Western imperialists. There are Zionist imperialists.
    , @Malla
    Even Democracy is starting to look more and more like a scam. I guess Plato said (got this from a Jay Dyer video) that Democracy is a scam, there is always an oligarchy behind the scenes. It just gets the people excited more for national causes including wars for the oligarchs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. DeriKuk says:
    @jilles dykstra
    I wonder what truth is being revealed.
    The Boers, mainly of Dutch and German origin, drove the original peoples from their lands, in wars.
    These wars were extremely one sided, repeater rifles against javelins etc.
    How many casualties among the javelin people, never saw any estimate.
    With the end of racism, and democracy, the Boers etc became a minority.
    A relative of mine lived in S Africa from 1955 until 1985, then the first bombs exploded, and, as he had the Dutch pension age, 65, he and his wife left for the Netherlands, though he loved S Africa.
    He died not so long ago, visited S Africa until high age, and told me about deteriorating conditions, the country in general, but especially how whites were treated.
    He said 'they all (whites) want to leave, but most of them cannot', financially.
    There can be long discussions about the moral side of the conflict between black and white, who owns the land, etc., what happens is clear to me: a rich country going the Zimbabwe way.
    I never saw my relative as a racist, yet he was of the opinion that 'the blacks are completely useless'.
    In my opinion just a statement of fact.

    “These wars were extremely one sided, repeater rifles against javelins etc.”

    I don’t think there were “repeater” muskets – let alone rifles – before the 1860s… which by my reckoning comes a few years after 1652. Please pay attention to these little details before you besmirch you own arguments in the future.

    Read More
    • Agree: Realist
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. Truth says:
    @Malla
    Oh, you are an afrocentrist.
    If we are black like Africans, why did Idi Amin kick us out of Uganda?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-i0JVip9N4

    Why did that gorilla steal all the wealth we had created with hard work?

    Indians vary in skin colour from light brown to even White to jet black.

    From Dark brown

    http://pavementpieces.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/11357951943_79b03aeb98_n.jpg

    http://bermudasun.bm/Images/Images/160862.jpg

    to light brown

    http://www.matrimonymanagement.com/image/wed11.jpg

    http://www.ekroopvivah.com/theme/Default/img/banner.jpg

    What are you exactly trying to prove?

    I’m glad you didn’t put pictures of Hijras up again, Bro, I just ate; except the last one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Thanks. After that video you showed me about hijras (transgender) in Bollywood, I have become a bit careful. Indeed since that time onwards, I look at every celebrity with a critical eye. Glad I did not cause you to throw up.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. Peasant says:
    @Malla
    Many of those cathedrals were built before colonialism even began

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Lincoln_Cathedral_viewed_from_Lincoln_Castle.jpg

    This is the Lincoln Cathedral in Lincoln, England. Building commenced in 1072 and continued in several phases throughout the medieval period. It was the tallest building in the world for 238 years (1311–1549). It was the first building in the world taller than the Great Pyramid of Giza. But even then it was not the largest cathedral in England, York Cathedral was even larger.
    This was built before colonialism even began. And there are loads of such cathedrals in Europe before 1600.

    Also Haiti, the poor shithole carribean country too was a colonial power. After genociding the French Whites on that island (except a few Germans and Poles) they colonized the Dominican Republic. The Dominican Republic celebrates their independence day from Haiti. So why is Haiti with its colonial history not rich?

    https://www.officeholidays.com/countries/dominican_republic/independence-day.php

    This public holiday is always celebrated on 27 February.
    It is the Dominican Republic's National Day and it commemorates independence from Haiti in 1844.

    Kind sir,

    I put you forward for commenter of the month. I have never seen so many informative comments from one commenter in such a short period of time.

    Bravo!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Thank you for your kind words. I am glad I am getting these facts out to a larger audience.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. bj says:
    @Bill Holdon
    If I were to believe all Boers were like those shown in the video, I would say let the african savages have them.

    This guy is a more typical Afrikaner.

    Your Security in South Africa | Craig Roseveare

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Malla says:
    @Peasant
    Kind sir,

    I put you forward for commenter of the month. I have never seen so many informative comments from one commenter in such a short period of time.

    Bravo!

    Thank you for your kind words. I am glad I am getting these facts out to a larger audience.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. Malla says:
    @Truth
    I'm glad you didn't put pictures of Hijras up again, Bro, I just ate; except the last one.

    Thanks. After that video you showed me about hijras (transgender) in Bollywood, I have become a bit careful. Indeed since that time onwards, I look at every celebrity with a critical eye. Glad I did not cause you to throw up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA cold war version of Communism. Communism is about producers having bigger say about the distribution of what they produced and the equality of the society.

    So far communism has been implemented badly due to the adverse circumstances and poor quality of the participants. You should not put out verdict too early because of bad precedents unless you are brain washed by other ideology and does not have the capacity of open mindedness. This also apply to democracy, though democracy has been hijacked by the Western imperialists as a facade to cover their crimes, but given the right condition, democracy can be beneficial to be human beings just like communism.

    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA

    You will be surprised to know how much the CIA (and the OSS before them) has actually helped in spreading communism around the world.
    The USA helped create the People’s Republic of China. Wall Street bankers were behind Lenin and his gang. The USA also brought Castro to power in Cuba.
    This whole thing is a big scam, a game, a kabuki play. There is no Communism vs Capitalism. Both are arms of the same monster.

    Western imperialists

    There are no Western imperialists. There are Zionist imperialists.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Indian nut, typical 'god-fearing' morally defunct evil American exceptionalist, gang of unrepentant war criminal Jap and holocaust denier.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. bj says:

    Is South Africa Headed For Civil War? | Steve Hofmeyr and Stefan Molyneux

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  122. bj says:

    Beyond Black and White: A breakdown of different race groups in SA

    http://historyreviewed.com/?p=186

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  123. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA cold war version of Communism. Communism is about producers having bigger say about the distribution of what they produced and the equality of the society.

    So far communism has been implemented badly due to the adverse circumstances and poor quality of the participants. You should not put out verdict too early because of bad precedents unless you are brain washed by other ideology and does not have the capacity of open mindedness. This also apply to democracy, though democracy has been hijacked by the Western imperialists as a facade to cover their crimes, but given the right condition, democracy can be beneficial to be human beings just like communism.

    Even Democracy is starting to look more and more like a scam. I guess Plato said (got this from a Jay Dyer video) that Democracy is a scam, there is always an oligarchy behind the scenes. It just gets the people excited more for national causes including wars for the oligarchs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. Malla says:
    @Malla

    Or the communism make your way of life, ‘capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism’ appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?
     
    Communism is not the enemy of Capitalism. It is a system financed and supported by big banking elites because in this system the government gets maximum power over the people, something the elites like and want to implement on the entire world. You do not own anything yourself, you do not own your own house, you do not own your own cloths. You are basically not human but a slave automon.
    I am all for socialism. Not Communism.
    Besides that, Communists are experts in brainwashing.
    Check out this book. Maybe some of these techniques have been used on you.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/03/04/communism-in-romania-the-anti-humans-by-dumitru-bacu/

    http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pdf_books/antihumans.pdf
    The Anti-Humans: Student Re-education in Romanian Prisons by Dumitru Bacu
    Those who do this to others are not really humans.

    The Black Book of Communism
    https://archive.org/download/TheBlackBookofCommunism10/the-black-book-of-communism-jean-louis-margolin-1999-communism.pdf
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    I bash liars and haters regardless of whether they are black like you or white like the majority here. How the hell does that make me a hater?
     
    You should bash yourself then. LOL.

    You on the other hand have embraced hate with a passion. What makes you look so pathetic is your slavish identification with racists who hate your race.
     
    I have embraced truth. Most people in the brown world are racists. I know this for sure. We are all Nazis. The average Arab is a Nazi, the average Indian is a Nazi. Hitler was just trying to make Europeans like us Asians to ensure their survival, trying to kill of the universalist nature of European thinking for the more tribal nature common in the Middle East and the Subcontinent and many other parts of the world.
    The fact that I am supporting a race different than mine because I believe they have been wronged makes me not a racist.

    If anyone needs to see a psychiatrist it’s you.
     
    No, not really.I am great. You are an extreme case. You need to be put in a mental hospital ward ASAP.

    You are obviously a seriously f**ked up lowlife.
     
    LOL I live a great life, got a great easy high paying job. Most people who know me say I am intelligent, kind person. Well educated. .....
    You are a hateful shit. You boil in hatred in your pathetic life.

    “Hitler was just trying to make Europeans like us Asians to ensure their survival,…”

    For someone so well informed and Knowledgeable maybe you should be a little bit more skeptical about Hitler.

    I don’t need to “prove” it, because I ‘m sure you know where the money that put Hitler into power came from , where the money that saved the nazi party in the 30′s came from.

    Hitler was a great admirer of the British empire and you also know who we gave the world that empire.

    I’m trying to suggest that we have enough evidence to suggest that Hitler was a poodle in the hands of those who gave us the British empire, the I and II WW etc…

    The total destruction of Germany couldn’t have been achieved with just a defeat by an external enemy.

    And Hitler and lots of high ranking nazis looked like members of the tribe.

    of course , I might be completely wrong , but anyway your admiration for the man is, at best, naive.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    For someone so well informed and Knowledgeable maybe you should be a little bit more skeptical about Hitler.
     
    Yes I have heard about theories that the NSDAP was financed by bankers and the like. Also that Hitler was a Rothschild.
    And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.

    But on the other hand he and his party were rare in openly exposing the whole globalist conspiracy. He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. Worth noting is that Mussolini, Salazar (Portugal) and Franco of Spain are not reviled as much. Of course the lefties and the globalists hate them too but the Reich gets the most hatred from Hollywood (the propaganda arm of the elites). His economic policy was a good mix of free market economics and socialism and thus was a an alternative to the globalist elite controlled Communism and Corporate Capitalism.

    There is a video named "Dennis Wise- Claims of Hitler being controlled opposition 5-28-17" which debunks many of those claims. It is on youtube but obviously there are many restrictions put on it.

    Hitler was a great admirer of the British empire and you also know who we gave the world that empire.
     
    Because he thought that the Empire was a bulwark against Communism. But obviously he did not realize that the banking elites in London have been one of the biggest pushers of Communism in the world. Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire.

    And Hitler and lots of high ranking nazis looked like members of the tribe.
     
    Yes true. There are a few suspicious things about the regime.

    of course , I might be completely wrong , but anyway your admiration for the man is, at best, naive.
     
    Maybe you are right, I understand what you mean. But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich. German workers had a very high standard of living, the 6 million unemployment problem was solved with new public works jobs and the destruction heaped on Germany during the Weimar period, economic as well as social were all repaired during his short reign.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. Bliss says:
    @Malla
    Oh, you are an afrocentrist.
    If we are black like Africans, why did Idi Amin kick us out of Uganda?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-i0JVip9N4

    Why did that gorilla steal all the wealth we had created with hard work?

    Indians vary in skin colour from light brown to even White to jet black.

    From Dark brown

    http://pavementpieces.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/11357951943_79b03aeb98_n.jpg

    http://bermudasun.bm/Images/Images/160862.jpg

    to light brown

    http://www.matrimonymanagement.com/image/wed11.jpg

    http://www.ekroopvivah.com/theme/Default/img/banner.jpg

    What are you exactly trying to prove?

    Almost all Indians range from jet black to dark brown. ASI is black and every Indian has it. Most Indians are majority ASI.

    The most famous Indian of modern times, Gandhi, was stereotypically Indian:

    The most famous female Indian saint of recent times with the Father of indian rocketry and President of India:

    [MORE]

    The founder of the Hare Krishna movement:

    The founder of the Transcendental Meditation (TM) movement:

    Brahmin priests:

    https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/sri-vadapathira-kaliamman-hindu-temple-hindu-brahmin-priests-picture-id929269750

    Brahmin Prime Minister:

    India’s best runner:

    India’s top music composer:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    We Indians are a mix race of Caucasians and black aborigines and even East Asians upto a small extent. So obviously you will get massive variation in looks amongst Indian subcontinentals. They are all Indians but you are cherry picking. Indians are a mixture of ASI and ANI. But what about these Indians? '

    https://s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/images.deccanchronicle.com/dc-Cover-652ovhkibhg82kh6on274ihkn1-20171228012030.Medi.jpeg

    Arun Jaitley, Finance Minister of the Government India

    https://www.eturbonews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/0a1-14.jpg

    Ashok Gajapathi Raju, Minister of Civil Aviation, Government of India

    https://starofmysore.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/News-2-lk-advani.jpg

    L.K. Advani, Ex Home Minister of India

    https://s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/images.deccanchronicle.com/dc-Cover-redes1ua9h8qft0kk2h48jjrk4-20180529182019.Medi.jpeg

    Pranab Mukherjee, Ex President of the Republic of India

    http://ste.india.com/sites/default/files/2016/04/10/477586-ravi-shastri-700.jpg

    Ravi Shashtri, Indian Cricketer

    https://media.indiatimes.in/media/content/2016/Dec/7600_1480837725.jpg

    Ajit Agarkar, Indian Cricketer

    There are even Indian people with afro hair tho most Indians have straight or wavy hair

    http://www.srisathyasai.org.in/Images/Swami1.jpg

    Satya Sai Baba, conman, homosexual pervert

    The Indians you have posted and the ones I have posted are all Indians. But even the light brown Indians, I have posted above would have looked as blacks to Northern Europeans.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. @jilles dykstra
    I wonder what truth is being revealed.
    The Boers, mainly of Dutch and German origin, drove the original peoples from their lands, in wars.
    These wars were extremely one sided, repeater rifles against javelins etc.
    How many casualties among the javelin people, never saw any estimate.
    With the end of racism, and democracy, the Boers etc became a minority.
    A relative of mine lived in S Africa from 1955 until 1985, then the first bombs exploded, and, as he had the Dutch pension age, 65, he and his wife left for the Netherlands, though he loved S Africa.
    He died not so long ago, visited S Africa until high age, and told me about deteriorating conditions, the country in general, but especially how whites were treated.
    He said 'they all (whites) want to leave, but most of them cannot', financially.
    There can be long discussions about the moral side of the conflict between black and white, who owns the land, etc., what happens is clear to me: a rich country going the Zimbabwe way.
    I never saw my relative as a racist, yet he was of the opinion that 'the blacks are completely useless'.
    In my opinion just a statement of fact.

    Yeah right: I never saw my relative as a racist, yet he was of the opinion that ‘the blacks are completely useless’.
    In my opinion just a statement of fact…….. Yeah, Just NAZI = hateful=bigot

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. Bliss says:
    @Malla
    My God, I have come across a lot of idiots on this website. You top them all. What was the gist of my post?
    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today's black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans. Thousands of years before the bantu black was even formed, hell even before the Koi San were formed, there were Caucasian people living in Africa.
    Go through that video again. You did not understand it as you have, what we call in India, 'mund buddhi'. Basically you are thick.

    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans.

    You drooling retard, modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent. What kind of an utterly clueless idiot are you to claim they had nothing in common?

    All humans in Africa and outside Africa have African human ancestors. Therefore alll races of mankind can be traced back to africans. Why is it such an exciting surprise for you to learn that Europeans are descended from humans in the Deep South of Africa? The Hofmeyr skull just confirms what genetics already revealed.

    Btw, the Hofmeyr skull predates european Cheddar man by over 25,000 years. Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot…

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    Well, you've got the Out of Africa dogma down pat. You do realise Cheddar Man's pigmentation is hypothesis.

    What do you make of the 9.5 million year old teeth they found in Germany, which are similar to African Lucy's but predate hers by a couple million years?
    , @Peasant
    'Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot'

    Cheddar man had been reconstructed earlier with white coloured skin. This reconstruction was just a politically correct version. The scientist who did the reconstruction is on record as saying nobody knows if he had dark skin or not.

    The funniest part is that skin colour is not race. There are many southern dravidian Indians darker than many Africans but who look down on them beacuse of Africans primitive features eg prognathism, smaller head size, low foreheads etc and also primitive behaviours eg violence.

    You see you use an example of Cheddar man to point out how African ancient Europeans were, not realsiing that Cheddar man's bone structure, facial composition and hairline are all caucasian. You would never maintain the middle easterners are sub saharan blacks and yet you think prehistoric Europeans were. They are both caucosoid- which most sub saharan blacks (the pure ones anyway-in prehistoric times there was substantial in migration of middle eastern dna into the horn of Africa area which is why there are generally more gracile than southern and west African blacks) are not.

    By the way cheddar man has living re
    latives in modern Britain:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5364983/amp/Retired-history-teacher-believes-looks-like-Cheddar-Man.html

    Cheddar man White (and in black photo clearly Caucasian):

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5453665/amp/Was-Cheddar-man-white-all.html

    African Albinos (skin colour is not race):

    https://www.cwporter.com/africanalb.htm

    My final comment:

    http://nelson-haha.api-meal.eu/

    p.s I saw a comment recently that blacks do not understand what race is and that they think it is just skin colour. They are so dumb as to have taken to heart the liberal mantra that we should not judge people on the colour of thier skin. As if skin colour was not an indication of less desirable traits rather than a bad trait itself (although blacks tend to dislike it and spend alot of money on lightening creams). Im glad I saw your comments as it reconfirmed what I already knew. Lol.

    , @Malla

    modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent.
     
    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc... more than 150000 years ago at the least. Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures. Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them. The OOA migrants left Africa 80,000 years ago and even 40,000 years ago there was a back migration of Caucasians into Africa and for the next 32,000 years there were no Negroids around. The Negroid race was not even formed yet.
    Ancestors of Negroids have absorbed genes from archaic primitive populations as late as 150,000 years ago and those genes are not found in Out of Africa (OOA) populations.The OOA populations left 80,000 years ago but there is no history of these genes absorbed by Negroids, 150,000 years ago. How is that possible? Obviously the two populations (OOA populations and ancestors of Negroids/Khoi Sans etc..) had separated ATLEAST 150,000 years ago. Even unique Khoi San genes are not found in OOA populations.
    , @Dagandy
    Uhm ...that cheddar man pigmentation has been proved to be fraud .

    Malla is correct,,your really low IQ.

    @malla ...you've posted some great stuff that I've enjoyed since finding unz .
    Thanks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Respect says:

    And Merkelita von Siria could not accept afrikaner refugees ? , ah , no , their are white .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  130. Binyamin says:

    Mercer accurately highlights some of the odious practices of apartheid however, the article is historically inaccurate. The British did not invent Apartheid. Yes, there was widespread racial discrimination in South Africa prior to 1948 before the National party (the party of apartheid) came to power. But this was the case in all corners of the then British Empire, in Africa, India and elsewhere.
    During the second world war many National Party stalwarts such as John Vorster were open sympathizers of Nazi Germany and were interned by the then South African Government of General Smuts.
    The reason why the apartheid policies of the National Party which were codified and put in place between 1948 and 1950 caused unique worldwide opprobrium was because after the horrors of the second world war, the idea of racial supremacy was widely and rightly completely discredited. It is worth pointing out that the Apartheid government in South Africa were not white nationalists, they were white supremacists. Their worldview was based on the premise that the European race was superior to all other races, a mindset utterly unacceptable to the rest of the world especially since by now the world had known what racial supremacist ideology leads to, mainly the horrors of Nazi Germany.
    Moreover, in Mercer’s article there is a lot of ‘whataboutery’- what about the Americans and their supposed crimes and blah, blah, blah. I thought she was writing about her homeland and apartheid? One sometimes wonders if Mercer hates America so much why did she take up US citizenship? It has off course nothing to do with the generous welfare benefits US citizens often get, especially in their old age such as Medicare.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bj

    the idea of racial supremacy was widely and rightly completely discredited. It is worth pointing out that the Apartheid government in South Africa were not white nationalists, they were white supremacists. Their worldview was based on the premise that the European race was superior to all other races, a mindset utterly unacceptable to the rest of the world especially since by now the world had known what racial supremacist ideology leads to, mainly the horrors of Nazi Germany.
     
    Racial supremacy is the attitude of Jews world wide and the state policy of the apartheid state of Israel. Your conclusion that racial supremacy leads to the horrors of Nazi Germany is playing out in Israel, as the Jewish State of Israel massacres the Palestinians in slow genocide.

    Your words are the lies and hypocrisy of a tribal cult preying on normal humanity for thousands of years. The Afrikaners know the Jews instigated the Boer War to steal the mineral wealth of South Africa and you have the nerve to call the Afrikaners supremacists!

    From Yahweh to Zion by Laurent Guyénot (Author), Kevin Barrett (Translator)

    https://www.amazon.com/Yahweh-Zion-Laurent-Guy%C3%A9not-ebook/dp/B0798DF7K1

    And for your edification....The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed

    https://controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. Realist says:
    @The Alarmist
    As Home Secretary prior to rising to PM, Mrs. May had access to the vast data gathered by the UK's intelligence apparatus as well as much shared among Five Eyes members. There is little doubt that, like in the US government, most of the major politicians in the UK are hopelessly compromised and therefore beholden to she or he who holds the data. What drives the Deep State insane about Trump is that he is difficult to blackmail because at some point he just says "eff it," which means they are probably running him by more overt threats.

    To Bragadocious' question about dredging up the US history, we assumed the mantle of Leader of the Free world (more like Leader of the Fee World, if you ask me), and became instrumental in regime change in South Africa. The US is fair game, especially when you see it's former African American President standing in SA and giving a virtual stamp of approval to its new racist policies.

    What is happening to the Boers in SA is an atrocity by any reasonable measure, but it is winked at by the Western Establishment because they too are engaged in a war on a certain class of people who won't go quietly into the dark night.

    ……war on a certain class of people who won’t go quietly into the dark night.

    At least some won’t.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. Them Guys says:
    @Malla
    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    "This is the African who goes about promising his fellows that when the Europeans are expelled, all Africans will drive cars.This is the African who promises UN posts to illiterates. This is the African who goes on speaking tours in Europe and is interviewed by the world’s journalists.

    In Malawi the word for “politician” is “Wa-Benz”. “Wa” is “man”, and “Benz”, of course, is Mercedes-Benz."

    ....snip....
    "Oh really, why not? Oh, well, it seems the Zambian army killed three tourists yesterday and we might get shot down.

    These tourists came from my hotel and were having a picnic on the Rhodesian side in their bathing suits. Two were killed immediately by machine gun fire from the Zambian side and the third, one of the girls, hid behind a rock for half an hour waist deep in the crocodile-infested water until they moved the guns and killed her. The body was never found.

    The Zambians accused them of trying to swim across to their side of the river to blow up a power station. Sure. Through forty-nine million gallons of water a minute rushing through a narrow gorge and the shallows full of crocs.

    These teenagers were American or Canadian, but no note of protest was ever forthcoming to the Zambian government because of it. It was Rhodesia’s fault for creating tension in the area and the Americans should not have been their. (I believe it was in Uganda about 8 years go that two American newspaper reporters were killed and fed to crocs for witnessing the murder of an entire army barracks. The American government demanded an investigation and was perfectly satisfied when the chief suspect was placed in charge.)

    What if the Rhodesian Army had killed Americans having a picnic in Zambia?
    It was in connection with this incident that Ian Smith said,
    “If your skin is black, you will be forgiven anything.”"

    ...snip.....

    "In Africa, European-owned farms, homes, and businesses are tolerated only until the Africans can stand the chaos created by their confiscation. The owners are given 24 hours to leave the country with two suitcases and a few dollars; or they are given cash and expelled, but are prohibited by “exchange control regulations” from taking the cash with them; or they are paid off with government bonds which do not mature for 25 years and can be repudiated by any succeeding government; or they are terrorized by thugs and are told by the police, “If you don’t like it, why don’t you get out of the country!” Then technicians are imported to exploit the resources created or discovered by the former whites. Statistics are falsified by equating the old whites with the new ones. “Despite the horror of the past, there are now 60,000 Belgians (or whatever), spread through the Congo, which once had 90,000, and the nation’s industries, commerce and transport system could not work without them”. Ah, but which ones are they?

    This is the new colonialism. We must help to kill the white Rhodesians so as to butter up the blacks into allowing us to help exploit their property, or the enormous mineral resources which the blacks were never aware of.""

    ...snip.....

    "The terrorists are not freedom fighters. To be in the army in Rhodesia is relatively safe unless you happen to step on a landmine, run into an ambush, or catch up with someone you are chasing. Terrorists stay away from soldiers because soldiers carry guns. The purpose of terrorism is to discourage civilian cooperation with an established government. What is not safe is to be an unarmed African in a terrorist-infested zone. Such a person is likely to see his chief beaten to death, his wife and daughters raped, his sons kidnapped, his ears, lips and nose cut off “pour encourager les autres”. He will be told, “We are coming back. Do not tell the Europeans which way we went. We want so many bags of maize waiting for us when we return.” "

    ...snip....

    "Perhaps you have noticed that countries in which Africans hold all the land must subsist largely off foreign aid. The Frelimo government of Mozambique confiscated the homes and farms of a quarter million Portuguese, and then asked the Rhodesians to feed their starving population! As soon as they got their hands on a couple of trainloads of Rhodesian maize, they declared war on Rhodesia! They were instantly given a healthy dose of foreign aid “assistance” by Britain, whose socialist Prime Minister at that time owned five houses. "

    ...snip...

    "Do you remember the famous “Wiriyamu Massacre”? Where Portuguese soldiers were supposed to have killed 400 (or was it 463?) villagers in a village by that name? No village with that or any similar name in that area was ever proven to exist. Yet the stories of the Wiriyamu massacre and the search for the village of Wiriyamu made headlines all over the world for months. (Strangely enough, until the revolution in Portugal almost to the day.) This story was later found to have fabricated at a conference in Czechoslovakia. About the best thing you can say for newspapers is that they will print anything that makes money. "

    ...snip....
    "Recently an un-elected American official [Henry Kissinger], without the knowledge or consent of the American people, attempted to commit his adopted country to the support of several un-elected Communist dictatorships in their voting-rights war against Rhodesia, a country which that official has never even visited.

    Since Mr. Kissinger is a refugee from Nazi Germany, it is apparent that he feels something less than grateful: Rhodesian had the highest killed-in-action ratio of any Commonwealth country during WWII.

    Rhodesia would accept Mr. Kissinger; Rhodesia would protect his life, his family, his property, his religion; it would allow him full citizenship after two years.

    Can he say the same for Zambia or Mozambique, where religious minorities are tortured, killed, driven into the jungles to starve, where churches are abolished and religion is illegal?

    Neither has there ever been any anti-Semitic legislation in South Africa, where Jews enjoy full political rights.

    South African Jews are among the richest in the world. They are the second greatest single source of Israeli foreign exchange. They have been allowed to do this in a very short time. And they have almost single-handedly financed the movement towards black rule in that country. They are also known to pay or treat their Africans no better than anyone else, as personal experience and strikes at Mr. Oppenheimer’s diamond company can soon attest."
    ...snip...

    "The willingness of South African Jews to repay with contempt the privileges and opportunities of citizenship in one of the richest (and freest) countries of the world, to which most of them fled as penniless refugees, has caused them to be widely hated."

    Maybe Poster “Truth” didn’t learn anything as he/she stated….However, what I did learn is that I and many others who claim that…Jews and Negroes are The two worst possible Curses upon European White folks, that could ever be a curse. It took me until I was about age of 50 yrs old, when then 15 yrs ago, I first became really Jewised Up and awake fully about Jews. So until that age 50 era, I was a firm believer that, NOTHING and NOBODY Else is, nor could ever be worse than Blacks.

    That all changed once I got Jewised Up, and now I admit I was very wrong about Blacks…I Now know, and without any doubt, that Blacks are slightly less of a massive major Curse upon Whites…If I had to rate it by assigning a number, say a 10 means absolute worst curse on Whites….Then, Jews get rated at, 15+ and Blacks at a lower number rate of just, 14.5 or, 1/2 point below the curse of Jews on Whiteys.

    These great informative reply posts by Malla, have vindicated me in proving me correct as can be. The Two main, major, Massive Curses against European Whites is and has been….Jews#1 and African Savage Blacks at #2…But a Very Close #2…..So close I prefer to avoid Both groups like the major Plague they both have well proven themselves to be.

    If one were to compare America to a Human body, to describe its many problems…It would look like a very sickly and diseased Human Body, with Scab covered deep sores all over its body. And if you were to carefully peel back a scab, any and every scab from the many sores. And peered into the poison puss filling the sore spot, it would be as if, every sore was a negro, and beneath every scab covering, deep within that poison puss, stood a tiny Jew with his snarling evil face staring back up at you. The scab covered sores are the visible problems aka negros, while the real poison aka the puss inside is Jewish. Deeply well hidden and only revealed by peeling away the scab he hides under, and even then one must possess a very keen vision eye sight or use a microscope to view him.

    These postings Malla Posted up also vindicate, a website owner guy named, Bro. Kapner at, realjewnews dot com, when he has said many times that, No major problem such as Americas Black problems, can ever get fixed unless Americans first deal with it’s massive, Jew problems. He advises a total boot out same as 109 prior nations have had to do, if America ever wishes to end its problems, and return to when it was a great and swell nation and peoples again. Bro Kapner is correct, and these posts on Africans and Tribal jungle blacks….Well prove it so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    I am glad, my posts were of help.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Them Guys says:
    @Joe Wong
    Well, the American can do better than a Jewess, the Americans even bombed, killed and waterboarded millions of people for decades on fabricated WMD allegations without provocation, wage an all out trade war by allege Chinese stealing their technologies without proof, while they are benefiting handsomely from Chinese supplied cheap and quality materials to maintain their living standard that they cannot afford themselves, etc.

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate ....

    Ahhh Soooo! Chop, Chop.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. TheJester says:
    @Stan d Mute

    They then taught these people to read and write their own language.
     
    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics. We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    The East Asians and Mesopotamians with their primitive pictographic languages at least managed to innovate an impressive amount given the limitations. Africans never innovated even the most basic of concepts like the wheel. Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.

    Allowing them [Bantu Africans] in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.

    Well said, Stan d Mute.

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia. (Affirmative action jobs must pay well. I talking about a social phenomenon in some of the richest counties in the United States.) These marriages make sense in a way. Given the alternative, I can imagine what transpires over morning coffee between a White feminist who hates White men and one of the White men she hates.

    On the other hand, White feminists who hate White men and Black power males who hate White men have a lot in common. Their back-and-forth over morning coffee must provide both of them a cathartic effect as they vent their anger against a common enemy.

    However, I’m wondering if many of these White feminists will become disillusioned when Black male domestic violence, as happened to Rachel Dolezal, starts to rear its ugly head. There is also the question of whether shared anger is a viable basis for a stable marriage.

    Although somewhat dated, a 2000 NYT article reports that Blacks commit domestic violence at almost triple the rate of Whites.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/18/us/study-shows-a-racial-divide-in-domestic-violence-cases.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia.
     
    And who is behind this phenomenon?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2_K5koFGRY

    Who's behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.
    , @Them Guys
    TheJester: Keep in mind, that of all those White women, especially the femNazis feminist types, many, many if not most are actually Jewish women. Or 1/2 Jewish. And you cannot just go by names and last names, due to Jews being famous for doing name changes in order to "fit" as a European whitey and fool others. Name changes, nationality changes, race changes and religious conversions...Fake, False, Fraudulent in many cases.


    This is done, without a doubt, if one just looks at how everything has gone so far the past 100 yrs in usa and several hundred years in EU nations, in order to Hide their Jewishness, and they know sooner or later that proverbial Cat will get out of the Bag, and expose them fully. So if they can convince most peoples of being a European White women, then when the truth and facts come out and things turn for the worse....It will always be, European Whites who get Blamed!...Never Jews get blamed...Take issue of Slavery as just one small example of this phenomenon. Mostly done by Jewry, yet who gets blamed always? European Whites get blamed always...In fact until I discovered this Jewish slavery connection, online Via many articles and proofs, I don't ever recall hearing Anyone ever blame even a single Jew for slavery in usa or elsewhere. I am 65 yrs old, heard whitey blamed for every slavery issue always and all my life..yet never heard a single mention of Blame a Jew for slavery. Not until aprox 12-15 yrs ago when first discovered vast Jewish connections. Most people still know zero of this factoid. Most also refuse to believe its true too.


    So, now consider all the many other issues and events euro whitey gets blamed for, which actually was done by and for and profited by Jews....The Main question is always..."But, is it Good for Jews?" If Yes, then go for it always...and whenever possible Use whitey as a scape goat for later on blames.


    Also, most every entity and org, such as, NAACP-ACLU-Feminists lefty's-Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism-AIPAC-and over 300 Other Jewish Orgs within usa-and most every Marxist teaching along with communism itself...ALL was Invented by, Run By, Funded By, Profited from By....Jews. And always promoted as some form or type of Great Goodness for Blacks, Females, School kiddies aka wont you just do it...for....them..CHILDREN Please!...while in reality, any form of goodness intentions never ever existed at all...Except of course good for...Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. @Bliss

    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans.
     
    You drooling retard, modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent. What kind of an utterly clueless idiot are you to claim they had nothing in common?

    All humans in Africa and outside Africa have African human ancestors. Therefore alll races of mankind can be traced back to africans. Why is it such an exciting surprise for you to learn that Europeans are descended from humans in the Deep South of Africa? The Hofmeyr skull just confirms what genetics already revealed.

    Btw, the Hofmeyr skull predates european Cheddar man by over 25,000 years. Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot...

    https://news.nationalgeographic.com/content/dam/news/2018/02/07/cheddar-man-reconstruction/01-cheddar-man-Credit-Channel-4-Plimsol-Productions-2.adapt.1900.1.jpg

    Well, you’ve got the Out of Africa dogma down pat. You do realise Cheddar Man’s pigmentation is hypothesis.

    What do you make of the 9.5 million year old teeth they found in Germany, which are similar to African Lucy’s but predate hers by a couple million years?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Joe Wong says:
    @Malla

    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA
     
    You will be surprised to know how much the CIA (and the OSS before them) has actually helped in spreading communism around the world.
    The USA helped create the People's Republic of China. Wall Street bankers were behind Lenin and his gang. The USA also brought Castro to power in Cuba.
    This whole thing is a big scam, a game, a kabuki play. There is no Communism vs Capitalism. Both are arms of the same monster.

    Western imperialists
     
    There are no Western imperialists. There are Zionist imperialists.

    Indian nut, typical ‘god-fearing’ morally defunct evil American exceptionalist, gang of unrepentant war criminal Jap and holocaust denier.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Joe Wong says:
    @Malla
    Oh, you are an afrocentrist.
    If we are black like Africans, why did Idi Amin kick us out of Uganda?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-i0JVip9N4

    Why did that gorilla steal all the wealth we had created with hard work?

    Indians vary in skin colour from light brown to even White to jet black.

    From Dark brown

    http://pavementpieces.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/11357951943_79b03aeb98_n.jpg

    http://bermudasun.bm/Images/Images/160862.jpg

    to light brown

    http://www.matrimonymanagement.com/image/wed11.jpg

    http://www.ekroopvivah.com/theme/Default/img/banner.jpg

    What are you exactly trying to prove?

    These are Photoshop doctored photos; Indians are either jet black or dark brown.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Thank you for the compliments.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. Malla says:
    @Bliss
    Almost all Indians range from jet black to dark brown. ASI is black and every Indian has it. Most Indians are majority ASI.

    The most famous Indian of modern times, Gandhi, was stereotypically Indian:

    https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51hbri7jg8L._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

    The most famous female Indian saint of recent times with the Father of indian rocketry and President of India:

    http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories/2016September/ammamos-2_092716033244.jpg

    The founder of the Hare Krishna movement:

    https://www.vrindavan-dham.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/prabhupada_321.jpg

    The founder of the Transcendental Meditation (TM) movement:

    http://www.tm-africa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MMY2.jpg

    Brahmin priests:

    https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/sri-vadapathira-kaliamman-hindu-temple-hindu-brahmin-priests-picture-id929269750

    Brahmin Prime Minister:

    https://c8.alamy.com/comp/BHY6RN/shri-p-v-narasimha-rao-prime-minister-of-india-11-november-1991-BHY6RN.jpg

    India’s best runner:

    https://drop.ndtv.com/albums/NEWS/ptusha/pt4new.jpg

    India’s top music composer:

    https://www.sbs.com.au/movies/sites/sbs.com.au.film/files/01_pc_0023.jpg

    We Indians are a mix race of Caucasians and black aborigines and even East Asians upto a small extent. So obviously you will get massive variation in looks amongst Indian subcontinentals. They are all Indians but you are cherry picking. Indians are a mixture of ASI and ANI. But what about these Indians? ‘

    Arun Jaitley, Finance Minister of the Government India

    Ashok Gajapathi Raju, Minister of Civil Aviation, Government of India

    L.K. Advani, Ex Home Minister of India

    Pranab Mukherjee, Ex President of the Republic of India

    Ravi Shashtri, Indian Cricketer

    Ajit Agarkar, Indian Cricketer

    There are even Indian people with afro hair tho most Indians have straight or wavy hair

    Satya Sai Baba, conman, homosexual pervert

    The Indians you have posted and the ones I have posted are all Indians. But even the light brown Indians, I have posted above would have looked as blacks to Northern Europeans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss
    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures. Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins. A few minutes of googling exposes his deceit:

    Pranab Mukherjee with his wife:

    https://images.firstpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Pranab-wife-pti-new.jpg

    Amit Agarkar, on the right:

    https://images.livehindustan.com/uploadimage/library/2017/11/11/16_9/16_9_1/ms_dhoni_and_ajit_agarkar_1510394419.jpg

    Sathya Sai Baba:

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ryUYxIcUOdQ/Utbh7fVEBUI/AAAAAAAADuI/1Ztwndttv_o/s1600/IMG_1728+(1).JPG
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Che Guava says:
    @Malla

    Theoretically less chance of civil war as the guns are already removed.
     
    The British government supplies guns to minority communities. That is the opinion in many black communities in London. What they mean is that the government supplies guns so that they kill each other. But that makes no sense whatsoever. Why get them in the land, in the first place only to help kill each other. The truth is the outsiders are being brought in since Windrush, post WW2, to create the forces which will be unleashed on the native Britons in the future, they are building up the numbers slowly. They will be the shock troops used in a future Bolshevik takeover. The native Britons are more or less de-armed. There is no 'Right to bear arms' enshrined in a constitution in Britain, Australia (where a false flag event was used to take the guns away), Canada etc... The fact that White Americans have guns, this fact alone have put the brakes on many plans of the globalist elites. The moment they lose their guns, the policies of the elites will fast forward across the world. If a Brazillian in Brazil had some knowledge of how the world really works, he would be praying in his Catholic Church that the Americans can keep their guns, Turks in Ankara would be praying in their mosques, that the Americans have their guns forever, Hindus should be praying in their temples in India that Americans be able to keep their guns, Thais should be praying in their Buddhist Temples that Americans be able to keep their guns.

    The old (17th century) England and Wales Bill of Rights, and its Scottish equivalent, did include the right of citizens to bear arms.

    Much of the U.S. constitution and Bill of Rights is based on those documents (probably more the former (England and Wales)), so they are worth reading if you have an interest in such things. I do.

    However, the Brit. legal-political classes decided to pretend that those laws did not exist at some stage, I think, but not sure, early in the last century, maybe earlier. They have never been rescinded.

    The sequence of how that happened would make a really good topic for a doctoral thesis in history.

    From my reading, such deep thought is not well-regarded in the west of now, Intersectional Thoughts on the Founders, On the Non-Intersectionality of the Founders, or some other such rubbish would be more likely to be a hit.

    There must be some places that are not like that?

    Also, looking at both the England-Wales and Scotland bills, and their connection to the founding principles of the U.S.A., in depth, at least worth a master’s thesis.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Wow, thank you for this information. British people need to really look this up, if these laws still stand, start arming themselves. I am aware that in the pre American Revolution period, the colonials had the right to free speech as well as the right to bear arms.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. bj says:

    The head of Genocide Watch, Dr. Gregory Stanton in 2012 conducted a study in South Africa and came to an incredible conclusion: “There is a coordinated campaign of genocide being conducted against white farmers.” Many of the Whites surrendered their guns when the African National Congress (ANC) government passed gun laws to confiscate the farmers’ weapons.

    Genocide Watch said, “Disarmament of a targeted group is one of the surest early warning signs of future genocidal killings.”

    https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/30/south-africa-white-farms-white-farmers/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  141. Malla says:
    @anonymous
    "Hitler was just trying to make Europeans like us Asians to ensure their survival,..."

    For someone so well informed and Knowledgeable maybe you should be a little bit more skeptical about Hitler.

    I don't need to "prove" it, because I 'm sure you know where the money that put Hitler into power came from , where the money that saved the nazi party in the 30's came from.

    Hitler was a great admirer of the British empire and you also know who we gave the world that empire.

    I'm trying to suggest that we have enough evidence to suggest that Hitler was a poodle in the hands of those who gave us the British empire, the I and II WW etc...

    The total destruction of Germany couldn't have been achieved with just a defeat by an external enemy.

    And Hitler and lots of high ranking nazis looked like members of the tribe.

    of course , I might be completely wrong , but anyway your admiration for the man is, at best, naive.

    For someone so well informed and Knowledgeable maybe you should be a little bit more skeptical about Hitler.

    Yes I have heard about theories that the NSDAP was financed by bankers and the like. Also that Hitler was a Rothschild.
    And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.

    But on the other hand he and his party were rare in openly exposing the whole globalist conspiracy. He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. Worth noting is that Mussolini, Salazar (Portugal) and Franco of Spain are not reviled as much. Of course the lefties and the globalists hate them too but the Reich gets the most hatred from Hollywood (the propaganda arm of the elites). His economic policy was a good mix of free market economics and socialism and thus was a an alternative to the globalist elite controlled Communism and Corporate Capitalism.

    There is a video named “Dennis Wise- Claims of Hitler being controlled opposition 5-28-17″ which debunks many of those claims. It is on youtube but obviously there are many restrictions put on it.

    Hitler was a great admirer of the British empire and you also know who we gave the world that empire.

    Because he thought that the Empire was a bulwark against Communism. But obviously he did not realize that the banking elites in London have been one of the biggest pushers of Communism in the world. Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire.

    And Hitler and lots of high ranking nazis looked like members of the tribe.

    Yes true. There are a few suspicious things about the regime.

    of course , I might be completely wrong , but anyway your admiration for the man is, at best, naive.

    Maybe you are right, I understand what you mean. But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich. German workers had a very high standard of living, the 6 million unemployment problem was solved with new public works jobs and the destruction heaped on Germany during the Weimar period, economic as well as social were all repaired during his short reign.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    "And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead."

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.

    " He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. "

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler - , everyone knows that Russia isn't an independent country and that Russia is controlled by the same force that controls USA, GB, France etc...Putin best friend is the the king of Israel.
    Maybe in the 30's it was the same. Except that the mafia state didn't exist at the time

    " Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire".

    Later in life ? Can you give a date ?

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.

    Why ? Again , because Hitler had great admiration for the British empire and because like his "friend" - the great war criminal Churchill - he believed that Indians were inferiors and they needed a white master.

    Your admiration for the man is really bizarre...Because I don't think you believe that you belong to an inferior race. Do you ?

    Do you also admire that great war criminal and the greatest English hero of all time - Sir Winston Churchill , and who despised Indians ?

    "But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich."

    No doubt about that...But that isn't reason for you or anyone else to consider the guy as a kind of hero because he tried to save the white race or he fought for the white race.

    As usual, follow the money. If you follow the money, you will understand that Hitler /Nazi Party had a master.

    In spite of Hollywood movies, there was no doubt that Germany was condemned to lose that war.

    The enemy was inside Germany and some high ranking Nazis were working for Germany's defeat.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong
    These are Photoshop doctored photos; Indians are either jet black or dark brown.

    Thank you for the compliments.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Hey Malla.

    Like your many comments that are annoying others here, cheers for that.

    ... but you seem to like cricket. As do I. I wish that Japan had adopted cricket instead of baseball, but, instead, a third-tier nation in cricket. Still, able to defeat the U.S.A. in baseball, quite often.

    So, that is fun to see.

    Nothing is beating test cricket as a sport that approaches chess in complexity at times.

    I tell friends 'cricket is more interesting, if only we adopted it', but the baseball cult is very strong, during summer, the Koushien, literally 'child pressing park' is on TV everywhere. It is the high-school championships.

    They go on to the commercial teams, then, one to three a year, to the U.S.A.

    I am much liking their spirit, but am still preferring cricket as an interesting game.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. Malla says:
    @TheJester

    Allowing them [Bantu Africans] in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.
     
    Well said, Stan d Mute.

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia. (Affirmative action jobs must pay well. I talking about a social phenomenon in some of the richest counties in the United States.) These marriages make sense in a way. Given the alternative, I can imagine what transpires over morning coffee between a White feminist who hates White men and one of the White men she hates.

    On the other hand, White feminists who hate White men and Black power males who hate White men have a lot in common. Their back-and-forth over morning coffee must provide both of them a cathartic effect as they vent their anger against a common enemy.

    However, I'm wondering if many of these White feminists will become disillusioned when Black male domestic violence, as happened to Rachel Dolezal, starts to rear its ugly head. There is also the question of whether shared anger is a viable basis for a stable marriage.

    Although somewhat dated, a 2000 NYT article reports that Blacks commit domestic violence at almost triple the rate of Whites.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/18/us/study-shows-a-racial-divide-in-domestic-violence-cases.html

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia.

    And who is behind this phenomenon?

    Who’s behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    Who’s behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.
     
    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They've created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.

    Rather than a vast Jewish conspiracy to promote race-mixing, the Jews have actually enforced a sort of Jim Crow media. For example, Barack Obama was conceived in 1960. But in 1960 a black man and a white woman couldn't be in the same room together on television. The so-called Jewish media has always lagged far behind the real world in terms of interracial couplings.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. bj says:
    @Binyamin
    Mercer accurately highlights some of the odious practices of apartheid however, the article is historically inaccurate. The British did not invent Apartheid. Yes, there was widespread racial discrimination in South Africa prior to 1948 before the National party (the party of apartheid) came to power. But this was the case in all corners of the then British Empire, in Africa, India and elsewhere.
    During the second world war many National Party stalwarts such as John Vorster were open sympathizers of Nazi Germany and were interned by the then South African Government of General Smuts.
    The reason why the apartheid policies of the National Party which were codified and put in place between 1948 and 1950 caused unique worldwide opprobrium was because after the horrors of the second world war, the idea of racial supremacy was widely and rightly completely discredited. It is worth pointing out that the Apartheid government in South Africa were not white nationalists, they were white supremacists. Their worldview was based on the premise that the European race was superior to all other races, a mindset utterly unacceptable to the rest of the world especially since by now the world had known what racial supremacist ideology leads to, mainly the horrors of Nazi Germany.
    Moreover, in Mercer's article there is a lot of 'whataboutery'- what about the Americans and their supposed crimes and blah, blah, blah. I thought she was writing about her homeland and apartheid? One sometimes wonders if Mercer hates America so much why did she take up US citizenship? It has off course nothing to do with the generous welfare benefits US citizens often get, especially in their old age such as Medicare.

    the idea of racial supremacy was widely and rightly completely discredited. It is worth pointing out that the Apartheid government in South Africa were not white nationalists, they were white supremacists. Their worldview was based on the premise that the European race was superior to all other races, a mindset utterly unacceptable to the rest of the world especially since by now the world had known what racial supremacist ideology leads to, mainly the horrors of Nazi Germany.

    Racial supremacy is the attitude of Jews world wide and the state policy of the apartheid state of Israel. Your conclusion that racial supremacy leads to the horrors of Nazi Germany is playing out in Israel, as the Jewish State of Israel massacres the Palestinians in slow genocide.

    Your words are the lies and hypocrisy of a tribal cult preying on normal humanity for thousands of years. The Afrikaners know the Jews instigated the Boer War to steal the mineral wealth of South Africa and you have the nerve to call the Afrikaners supremacists!

    From Yahweh to Zion by Laurent Guyénot (Author), Kevin Barrett (Translator)

    https://www.amazon.com/Yahweh-Zion-Laurent-Guy%C3%A9not-ebook/dp/B0798DF7K1

    And for your edification….The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed

    https://controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Add to that

    https://marucha.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/eustace-mullins-the-biological-jew.pdf

    The Biological Jew by Eustace Mullins

    https://archive.org/download/MonstersOfBabylon1/Monsters_of_Babylon%281%29.pdf

    Monsters Of Babylon

    https://archive.org/details/EzraPoundSpeaking-RadioSpeechesOfWorldWarIi

    Ezra Pound Speaking - Radio Speeches of World War II
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. Peasant says:
    @Bliss

    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans.
     
    You drooling retard, modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent. What kind of an utterly clueless idiot are you to claim they had nothing in common?

    All humans in Africa and outside Africa have African human ancestors. Therefore alll races of mankind can be traced back to africans. Why is it such an exciting surprise for you to learn that Europeans are descended from humans in the Deep South of Africa? The Hofmeyr skull just confirms what genetics already revealed.

    Btw, the Hofmeyr skull predates european Cheddar man by over 25,000 years. Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot...

    https://news.nationalgeographic.com/content/dam/news/2018/02/07/cheddar-man-reconstruction/01-cheddar-man-Credit-Channel-4-Plimsol-Productions-2.adapt.1900.1.jpg

    ‘Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot’

    Cheddar man had been reconstructed earlier with white coloured skin. This reconstruction was just a politically correct version. The scientist who did the reconstruction is on record as saying nobody knows if he had dark skin or not.

    The funniest part is that skin colour is not race. There are many southern dravidian Indians darker than many Africans but who look down on them beacuse of Africans primitive features eg prognathism, smaller head size, low foreheads etc and also primitive behaviours eg violence.

    You see you use an example of Cheddar man to point out how African ancient Europeans were, not realsiing that Cheddar man’s bone structure, facial composition and hairline are all caucasian. You would never maintain the middle easterners are sub saharan blacks and yet you think prehistoric Europeans were. They are both caucosoid- which most sub saharan blacks (the pure ones anyway-in prehistoric times there was substantial in migration of middle eastern dna into the horn of Africa area which is why there are generally more gracile than southern and west African blacks) are not.

    By the way cheddar man has living re
    latives in modern Britain:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5364983/amp/Retired-history-teacher-believes-looks-like-Cheddar-Man.html

    Cheddar man White (and in black photo clearly Caucasian):

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5453665/amp/Was-Cheddar-man-white-all.html

    African Albinos (skin colour is not race):

    https://www.cwporter.com/africanalb.htm

    My final comment:

    http://nelson-haha.api-meal.eu/

    p.s I saw a comment recently that blacks do not understand what race is and that they think it is just skin colour. They are so dumb as to have taken to heart the liberal mantra that we should not judge people on the colour of thier skin. As if skin colour was not an indication of less desirable traits rather than a bad trait itself (although blacks tend to dislike it and spend alot of money on lightening creams). Im glad I saw your comments as it reconfirmed what I already knew. Lol.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    I saw a comment recently that blacks do not understand what race is and that they think it is just skin colour. They are so dumb as to have taken to heart the liberal mantra that we should not judge people on the colour of thier skin.
     
    You are right, dude, these black people are weird. They really think race is just skin colour or that Europeans are just negroid blacks with White skin and that black Negroids are just Europeans with black skin. Crazy!!! There are so Many other physical difference in between the races.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. Malla says:
    @Che Guava
    The old (17th century) England and Wales Bill of Rights, and its Scottish equivalent, did include the right of citizens to bear arms.

    Much of the U.S. constitution and Bill of Rights is based on those documents (probably more the former (England and Wales)), so they are worth reading if you have an interest in such things. I do.

    However, the Brit. legal-political classes decided to pretend that those laws did not exist at some stage, I think, but not sure, early in the last century, maybe earlier. They have never been rescinded.

    The sequence of how that happened would make a really good topic for a doctoral thesis in history.

    From my reading, such deep thought is not well-regarded in the west of now, Intersectional Thoughts on the Founders, On the Non-Intersectionality of the Founders, or some other such rubbish would be more likely to be a hit.

    There must be some places that are not like that?

    Also, looking at both the England-Wales and Scotland bills, and their connection to the founding principles of the U.S.A., in depth, at least worth a master's thesis.

    Wow, thank you for this information. British people need to really look this up, if these laws still stand, start arming themselves. I am aware that in the pre American Revolution period, the colonials had the right to free speech as well as the right to bear arms.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Malla says:
    @Them Guys
    Maybe Poster "Truth" didn't learn anything as he/she stated....However, what I did learn is that I and many others who claim that...Jews and Negroes are The two worst possible Curses upon European White folks, that could ever be a curse. It took me until I was about age of 50 yrs old, when then 15 yrs ago, I first became really Jewised Up and awake fully about Jews. So until that age 50 era, I was a firm believer that, NOTHING and NOBODY Else is, nor could ever be worse than Blacks.

    That all changed once I got Jewised Up, and now I admit I was very wrong about Blacks...I Now know, and without any doubt, that Blacks are slightly less of a massive major Curse upon Whites...If I had to rate it by assigning a number, say a 10 means absolute worst curse on Whites....Then, Jews get rated at, 15+ and Blacks at a lower number rate of just, 14.5 or, 1/2 point below the curse of Jews on Whiteys.

    These great informative reply posts by Malla, have vindicated me in proving me correct as can be. The Two main, major, Massive Curses against European Whites is and has been....Jews#1 and African Savage Blacks at #2...But a Very Close #2.....So close I prefer to avoid Both groups like the major Plague they both have well proven themselves to be.


    If one were to compare America to a Human body, to describe its many problems...It would look like a very sickly and diseased Human Body, with Scab covered deep sores all over its body. And if you were to carefully peel back a scab, any and every scab from the many sores. And peered into the poison puss filling the sore spot, it would be as if, every sore was a negro, and beneath every scab covering, deep within that poison puss, stood a tiny Jew with his snarling evil face staring back up at you. The scab covered sores are the visible problems aka negros, while the real poison aka the puss inside is Jewish. Deeply well hidden and only revealed by peeling away the scab he hides under, and even then one must possess a very keen vision eye sight or use a microscope to view him.


    These postings Malla Posted up also vindicate, a website owner guy named, Bro. Kapner at, realjewnews dot com, when he has said many times that, No major problem such as Americas Black problems, can ever get fixed unless Americans first deal with it's massive, Jew problems. He advises a total boot out same as 109 prior nations have had to do, if America ever wishes to end its problems, and return to when it was a great and swell nation and peoples again. Bro Kapner is correct, and these posts on Africans and Tribal jungle blacks....Well prove it so.

    I am glad, my posts were of help.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. Malla says:
    @bj

    the idea of racial supremacy was widely and rightly completely discredited. It is worth pointing out that the Apartheid government in South Africa were not white nationalists, they were white supremacists. Their worldview was based on the premise that the European race was superior to all other races, a mindset utterly unacceptable to the rest of the world especially since by now the world had known what racial supremacist ideology leads to, mainly the horrors of Nazi Germany.
     
    Racial supremacy is the attitude of Jews world wide and the state policy of the apartheid state of Israel. Your conclusion that racial supremacy leads to the horrors of Nazi Germany is playing out in Israel, as the Jewish State of Israel massacres the Palestinians in slow genocide.

    Your words are the lies and hypocrisy of a tribal cult preying on normal humanity for thousands of years. The Afrikaners know the Jews instigated the Boer War to steal the mineral wealth of South Africa and you have the nerve to call the Afrikaners supremacists!

    From Yahweh to Zion by Laurent Guyénot (Author), Kevin Barrett (Translator)

    https://www.amazon.com/Yahweh-Zion-Laurent-Guy%C3%A9not-ebook/dp/B0798DF7K1

    And for your edification....The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed

    https://controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans.
     
    You drooling retard, modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent. What kind of an utterly clueless idiot are you to claim they had nothing in common?

    All humans in Africa and outside Africa have African human ancestors. Therefore alll races of mankind can be traced back to africans. Why is it such an exciting surprise for you to learn that Europeans are descended from humans in the Deep South of Africa? The Hofmeyr skull just confirms what genetics already revealed.

    Btw, the Hofmeyr skull predates european Cheddar man by over 25,000 years. Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot...

    https://news.nationalgeographic.com/content/dam/news/2018/02/07/cheddar-man-reconstruction/01-cheddar-man-Credit-Channel-4-Plimsol-Productions-2.adapt.1900.1.jpg

    modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent.

    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc… more than 150000 years ago at the least. Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures. Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them. The OOA migrants left Africa 80,000 years ago and even 40,000 years ago there was a back migration of Caucasians into Africa and for the next 32,000 years there were no Negroids around. The Negroid race was not even formed yet.
    Ancestors of Negroids have absorbed genes from archaic primitive populations as late as 150,000 years ago and those genes are not found in Out of Africa (OOA) populations.The OOA populations left 80,000 years ago but there is no history of these genes absorbed by Negroids, 150,000 years ago. How is that possible? Obviously the two populations (OOA populations and ancestors of Negroids/Khoi Sans etc..) had separated ATLEAST 150,000 years ago. Even unique Khoi San genes are not found in OOA populations.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc… more than 150000 years ago at the least.
     
    You're a scientifically illiterate buffoon. There is no "branching away" in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.

    Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures.
     
    You have no idea what they looked like. What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification. There are no "Caucasian facial structures" that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa. Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.


    Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them.
     
    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations. But, again, that doesn’t indicate discrete differentiation because those are superficial traits that are modulated by relatively few genes.
    , @Bliss

    those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc
     
    The idiot still doesn’t get it. Where the hell did you learn the absurd idea that a branch has “nothing to do” with what it branched away from?

    You should stick to regurgitating the 19th century racial pseudoscience that you learned at Stormfront. That clearly impresses the racist trash here, and gets you off too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Che Guava says:
    @Malla
    Thank you for the compliments.

    Hey Malla.

    Like your many comments that are annoying others here, cheers for that.

    … but you seem to like cricket. As do I. I wish that Japan had adopted cricket instead of baseball, but, instead, a third-tier nation in cricket. Still, able to defeat the U.S.A. in baseball, quite often.

    So, that is fun to see.

    Nothing is beating test cricket as a sport that approaches chess in complexity at times.

    I tell friends ‘cricket is more interesting, if only we adopted it’, but the baseball cult is very strong, during summer, the Koushien, literally ‘child pressing park’ is on TV everywhere. It is the high-school championships.

    They go on to the commercial teams, then, one to three a year, to the U.S.A.

    I am much liking their spirit, but am still preferring cricket as an interesting game.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Like your many comments that are annoying others here, cheers for that.
     
    Thanks bud. What is more fun is reading their frustrated responses.

    Yes, very few countries play cricket. The main cricketing countries are England, West Indies, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
    It would have been great of Japan and the USA would have played cricket too. Cricket is a great game, the complexity turns off newcomers but once you get a hang of it, you get addicted.
    However we are seeing Kenya, Afghanistan, Netherlands, Scotland etc...coming up lately and may become full fledged cricket playing countries in the future.
    A lot of Indians are becoming curious about baseball lately.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia.
     
    And who is behind this phenomenon?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2_K5koFGRY

    Who's behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.

    Who’s behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.

    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They’ve created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.

    Rather than a vast Jewish conspiracy to promote race-mixing, the Jews have actually enforced a sort of Jim Crow media. For example, Barack Obama was conceived in 1960. But in 1960 a black man and a white woman couldn’t be in the same room together on television. The so-called Jewish media has always lagged far behind the real world in terms of interracial couplings.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    For your Jewish masters you guys are just weapons to be used against Whitey. When a major race war takes place, the blackie will be getting bashed by Whitey while the remote controllers of blacky, the Jooie will run scot free.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsgBy5dnHpI
    The Tall Israeli That Runs The Rap Industry

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kjDo-5NRX8
    Dr. E. Michael Jones on the Black/Jewish Alliance and Destabilization

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFlPCwW9UXc
    Minister Louis Farrakhan - Black Entertainers Under Jewish Remote Control

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kdo5YHT7gY
    Jewish Financed Gangster Rap Music is Psychological Warfare

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNPuXcN9QhY
    Malcolm X on Jews

    For your Jewish massas you guys are just mere tools. On the slave ships the Jews were the massas, they are still your massas. Black people never left no plantation. When you came to America from Nigeria, you entered a plantation. Come to think about it, the whole world is a plantation it seems.

    , @Bliss

    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.
     
    This silly slave is seriously screwed up. You really have to wonder what he sees when he looks in the mirror. It’s hilarious to see a non-white so emotionally invested in Nazi race fantasies.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They’ve created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.
     
    Exactly. And it continues to this day. Including among the most vocal leaders of the racist alt-right such as Reed, Derbyshire, Anglin et al. Many of the alt-right members of this forum are posting from Japan, Philippines, China, Thailand, Mexico etc where they went to pursue their sexual fetish for non-white women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Malla says:
    @Che Guava
    Hey Malla.

    Like your many comments that are annoying others here, cheers for that.

    ... but you seem to like cricket. As do I. I wish that Japan had adopted cricket instead of baseball, but, instead, a third-tier nation in cricket. Still, able to defeat the U.S.A. in baseball, quite often.

    So, that is fun to see.

    Nothing is beating test cricket as a sport that approaches chess in complexity at times.

    I tell friends 'cricket is more interesting, if only we adopted it', but the baseball cult is very strong, during summer, the Koushien, literally 'child pressing park' is on TV everywhere. It is the high-school championships.

    They go on to the commercial teams, then, one to three a year, to the U.S.A.

    I am much liking their spirit, but am still preferring cricket as an interesting game.

    Like your many comments that are annoying others here, cheers for that.

    Thanks bud. What is more fun is reading their frustrated responses.

    Yes, very few countries play cricket. The main cricketing countries are England, West Indies, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
    It would have been great of Japan and the USA would have played cricket too. Cricket is a great game, the complexity turns off newcomers but once you get a hang of it, you get addicted.
    However we are seeing Kenya, Afghanistan, Netherlands, Scotland etc…coming up lately and may become full fledged cricket playing countries in the future.
    A lot of Indians are becoming curious about baseball lately.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Cricket used to be major in the U.S.A.

    In the latter half of the nineteenth century, the Spalding company invented baseball as a macho version of rounders. It was all intended just to sell stuff, from the start. Spalding equipment.

    They had much press cooperation in pushing their advertising line that baseball represented American manly virtues, and that cricket was for sissies. That was their line, and it is easy to confirm.

    To me, it is quite the opposite, although Spalding clearly won their marketing campaign there.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    For someone so well informed and Knowledgeable maybe you should be a little bit more skeptical about Hitler.
     
    Yes I have heard about theories that the NSDAP was financed by bankers and the like. Also that Hitler was a Rothschild.
    And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.

    But on the other hand he and his party were rare in openly exposing the whole globalist conspiracy. He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. Worth noting is that Mussolini, Salazar (Portugal) and Franco of Spain are not reviled as much. Of course the lefties and the globalists hate them too but the Reich gets the most hatred from Hollywood (the propaganda arm of the elites). His economic policy was a good mix of free market economics and socialism and thus was a an alternative to the globalist elite controlled Communism and Corporate Capitalism.

    There is a video named "Dennis Wise- Claims of Hitler being controlled opposition 5-28-17" which debunks many of those claims. It is on youtube but obviously there are many restrictions put on it.

    Hitler was a great admirer of the British empire and you also know who we gave the world that empire.
     
    Because he thought that the Empire was a bulwark against Communism. But obviously he did not realize that the banking elites in London have been one of the biggest pushers of Communism in the world. Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire.

    And Hitler and lots of high ranking nazis looked like members of the tribe.
     
    Yes true. There are a few suspicious things about the regime.

    of course , I might be completely wrong , but anyway your admiration for the man is, at best, naive.
     
    Maybe you are right, I understand what you mean. But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich. German workers had a very high standard of living, the 6 million unemployment problem was solved with new public works jobs and the destruction heaped on Germany during the Weimar period, economic as well as social were all repaired during his short reign.

    “And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.”

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.

    ” He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. ”

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler – , everyone knows that Russia isn’t an independent country and that Russia is controlled by the same force that controls USA, GB, France etc…Putin best friend is the the king of Israel.
    Maybe in the 30′s it was the same. Except that the mafia state didn’t exist at the time

    ” Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire”.

    Later in life ? Can you give a date ?

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.

    Why ? Again , because Hitler had great admiration for the British empire and because like his “friend” – the great war criminal Churchill – he believed that Indians were inferiors and they needed a white master.

    Your admiration for the man is really bizarre…Because I don’t think you believe that you belong to an inferior race. Do you ?

    Do you also admire that great war criminal and the greatest English hero of all time – Sir Winston Churchill , and who despised Indians ?

    “But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich.”

    No doubt about that…But that isn’t reason for you or anyone else to consider the guy as a kind of hero because he tried to save the white race or he fought for the white race.

    As usual, follow the money. If you follow the money, you will understand that Hitler /Nazi Party had a master.

    In spite of Hollywood movies, there was no doubt that Germany was condemned to lose that war.

    The enemy was inside Germany and some high ranking Nazis were working for Germany’s defeat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.
     
    Hitler really did not want a war with the British. He thought that the British would come to their senses (which they did not) and that the British people would have a better opinion of him for his magnanimous act. But of course the press was controlled by the elites and they spun the whole thing around as a marvelous daring escape. LOL. The Germans could have crushed those allied forces there and then. It was the media. He was so desperate to not have a war with the British, who he considered the brother people of the Germans that he sent Rudolf Hess, second in command in the Third Reich. But we all know what happened with him/

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler – , everyone knows that Russia isn’t an independent country
     
    Yup it looks like Russia is a fake opposition to the West today.

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.
     
    Jew propaganda has fooled us all for too long, brother.

    https://www.livemint.com/rf/Image-621x414/LiveMint/Period2/2017/05/27/Photos/Processed/[email protected]

    Where do you even get such info? Hitler met him, promised to help him but only after the Wehrmacht conquers the Soviet Union. How would the Germans reach India without conquering the Soviet Union? If they had conquered the Soviet Union, Iran was a friend of Germany. The Iranian leader was pro National Socialist, there was a Nazi movement in Iran. So then via Iran/Persia, they could come to India and fight the British forces in India.
    Subhash Chnadra Bose raised an army in the Wehrmacht from POWs from the British Indian Army called the Indian Legion, Indische Legion and there were even Indians in the SS Wafen, Indian Volunteer Legion of the Waffen-SS, Indische Freiwilligen Legion der Waffen-SS.
    But since the war against the Soviets was dragging on, Hitler advised Bose to take a submarine to go to Japan and continue his struggle there. Thus Bose traveled on a U boat to Madagascar where he was transferred to a Japanese submarine and we went to Tokyo where the Japanese government agreed to support him against the British. It is in Singapore that he raised a new Army called the INA from POWs from the British Indian Army. Strangely in Burma, the Indian troops of the INA (Indian national Army) supported by Japanese forces fought Indian troops of the British Indian Army supported by British forces.

    This video will explain everything.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBX1NsAoQ38

    Also Indian volunteers in the Wehrmacht and SS Waffen
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEhmgcXYGE0

    There were also Muslim Waffen SS division

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkKuJL6brB0
    Mostly French Algerian Army POWs and Bosnians/Albanians etc....

    When the German command planned to include Indian Muslim troops of the Waffen SS into the Muslim divisions, the Indian Muslims complained that they saw themselves as Indians first and they were retained in the Indian divisions.

    , @jilles dykstra
    " Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.” "

    Winter began early, by negligence, or intentionally, opinions differ, the German Wehrmacht was not equipped for winter.
    As an example, 'shitting at minus forty ° Celcius is a life threatening excercise', the shit freezes inside your body.
    The Luftwaffe did have winter clothing;
    But it was not just shitting and shelter, weapons froze, engines could not be started, and so on and so forth.
    Intentionally no winter clothing, the suspicion is that the responsible general did not want Hitler to win.

    But Moscow was strategically unimportant, as was Stalingrad.
    The Caucasus oil was important.
    I never understood this, until I found out that Japan had promised to attack the USSR if Hitler had taken Moscow and stood at the Wolga.
    In both cases Hitler failed.
    IF Japan would have attacked, I do not think so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. Bliss says:
    @Malla
    We Indians are a mix race of Caucasians and black aborigines and even East Asians upto a small extent. So obviously you will get massive variation in looks amongst Indian subcontinentals. They are all Indians but you are cherry picking. Indians are a mixture of ASI and ANI. But what about these Indians? '

    https://s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/images.deccanchronicle.com/dc-Cover-652ovhkibhg82kh6on274ihkn1-20171228012030.Medi.jpeg

    Arun Jaitley, Finance Minister of the Government India

    https://www.eturbonews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/0a1-14.jpg

    Ashok Gajapathi Raju, Minister of Civil Aviation, Government of India

    https://starofmysore.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/News-2-lk-advani.jpg

    L.K. Advani, Ex Home Minister of India

    https://s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/images.deccanchronicle.com/dc-Cover-redes1ua9h8qft0kk2h48jjrk4-20180529182019.Medi.jpeg

    Pranab Mukherjee, Ex President of the Republic of India

    http://ste.india.com/sites/default/files/2016/04/10/477586-ravi-shastri-700.jpg

    Ravi Shashtri, Indian Cricketer

    https://media.indiatimes.in/media/content/2016/Dec/7600_1480837725.jpg

    Ajit Agarkar, Indian Cricketer

    There are even Indian people with afro hair tho most Indians have straight or wavy hair

    http://www.srisathyasai.org.in/Images/Swami1.jpg

    Satya Sai Baba, conman, homosexual pervert

    The Indians you have posted and the ones I have posted are all Indians. But even the light brown Indians, I have posted above would have looked as blacks to Northern Europeans.

    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures. Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins. A few minutes of googling exposes his deceit:

    Pranab Mukherjee with his wife:

    Amit Agarkar, on the right:

    Sathya Sai Baba:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    My god!!! Really? Nordicist? Really? You need to go and get your head checked. You have some mental issues? The pictures I posted were Nordic? They look like Swedes? What are you smoking? And these people you posted are black? What is wrong with your head? Seriously.
    We Indians consider ourselves Indians neither blacks nor Whites. But mostly we call ourselves brown. No Light skinned Indian will consider an European closer to him than a dark skinned Indian and no dark skinned Indian will consider himself closer to a black African than a light skinned Indian. When the African students were attacked in Bangalore, in South India, every Indian considered them foreigners. Just like how White people or East Asians or Arabs (who actually look the most similar to us) would be called foreigners.
    The poster 'Peasant' is right. you black people are obsessed with skin colour. Very weird

    BTW this is another picture of Agarkar. Yup he looks like your typical Zambian.

    http://www.freepressjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Ajit-Agarkar.jpg

    This is Pranab Mukherjee with Ghanians on his official trip to Ghana

    https://resize.indiatvnews.com/en/resize/newbucket/715_-/2016/06/PTI6_12_2016_000172B.jpg

    Now check out Shashi Tharoor, Member of Parliament of India, elected from SOUTH INDIA (elected from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala),

    http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6422/1093/1600/sha.jpg

    Here is Shashi Tharoor with UN Secretary general Kofi Annan

    https://www.indepthnews.net/images/annan_tharoor.jpg

    Ya rite.....

    You Afrocentrists are desperate to have us in your team. LOL That is soooo pathetic. I am gonna tell my friends about it tomorrow. They are gonna laugh like hell when I tell you about your desperation to have us on your team and your obsession with the SKIN COLOUR of our Hindu Gods. Never before in their lives would they have given thought about this subject. Honestly dude, this is funny as hell. How pathetic......
    But I know what this is really about. So you can claim our civilization for yourself. Classic Cultural appropriation. So some hoodrat dope head in some American slum will shout out 'We biz kengs and quuuens of India and sheet! ' That is what this is all about, is it not?
    , @Malla

    Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins.
     
    This is the problem with these Afrocentrist idiots. No Hindu cares about the skin colour of their Gods in that way you Afrocentrist nutbags think about. Afrocentrists sickos are more concerned about the skin colours of our Gods than we are. If I tell this to my Indians friends they would die laughing. They would say, you guys need to get a life. I do not think me or any of my hindu friend EVER cared about the colour of our Gods, NEVER.

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.

    " THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated, and women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree, in
    hopes of producing that effect. To my eye the dark color is much more agreeable than the tawny hue of the half-caste, which that of the Makoloto ladies closely resembles. The women generally escape the fever, but they are less fruitful than formerly ; and to their complaint of being undervalued on account of the disproportion of the sexes, they now add their regrets at the want of children, of whom they are all excessively fond." Livingstone's Africa, page 204.

    " Katema, the ruler of the village, asked if I could not make a dress for him like the one I wore, so that he might appear as a white man when any stranger visited him." Livingstone's Africa,
    page 517.

    " The people under Bango are divided into a number of classes. There are his councillors, as the highest, who are generally head men of several villages, and the carriers, the lowest freemen.
    One class above the last obtains the privilege of wearing shoes from the chief by paying for it ; another, the soldiers or militia, pay for the privilege of serving, the advantage being that they are not afterward liable to be made carriers. They are also divided into gentlemen and little gentlemen, and, though quite black, speak of themselves as white men, and of others who may not wear shoes, as ' blacks.' The men of all these classes trust to their wives for food, and spend most of their time in drinking the palm-toddy." Livingstone's Africa, page 445.

    " Zuma, a rich widow of Wava, the owner of a thousand slaves, told me that her husband had been dead these ten years ; that she had only one son, and he was darker than herself; that she loved white men, and would go to Boussa with me." Clappertori's Africa, Vol. IV., page 222.

    " The Foulahs evidently consider all the negro natives as then inferiors; and, when talking of different nations, always rank themselves among the white people." Mungo Park's Travels in
    Africa, page 23.

    " The women are well disposed toward strangers of fair complexion, apparently with the permission of their husbands." Burton's Africa, page 216.

    "The Kaffirs believe that white men can do anything." Baldwins Africa, page 266.

    " The negro Mohammedans worship God under the name of Allah ; they acknowledge Mohammed as a prophet, but do not pay him divine honors; they have some traditions respecting Jesus Christ, whom they call Nale, the son of Malek, and whom they speak of as a great prophet, who had wrought wondrous miracles. They denounce as impious the doctrine that God could have
    carnal conversation with a woman, but have a prophecy of their own :that some day they shall be all subdued by a white people." Readers Savage Africa, page 354.

    "The European stranger, travelling in their country, is expected to patronize their wives and daughters ; and they feel hurt, as if dishonored, by his refusing to gratify them. The custom is very
    prevalent along this coast. At Gaboon, perhaps it reaches the acme ; there a man will in one breath offer the choice between his wife, sister, and daughter. The women of course do as they are bid by the men, and they consider all familiarity with a white man a high honor." Hutchinsori's Western Africa, Vol. II., page 24.

    " ' I know the white men, too, said the prince, they are good men ; in fact I have reason to speak well of them, for I also am a white man, and therefore I am of opinion that they are of the same
    blood as ourselves.'
    It is in this manner that Falatahs endeavor to claim relationship with Europeans, though these people are either of a swarthy complexion or black as soot ; and this passion to be considered fair is often carried to a most ridiculous height. White men, how sorry soever their outward appearance may be, are certainly considered, not only by Falatahs, but by the native blacks, as a superior order of beings, in all respects more excellent than themselves. At Yaoorie we recollect having overheard a conversation between two men, who were quarrelling in the very height of passion. ' What!' exclaimed one of them to his fellow, ' thou pitiful son of a black ant ! dost thou presume to say that a horse was my father ? Look at these Christians ! for as
    they are, I am ; and such were my ancestors ; answer me not, I say, for I am a white man ! ' The speaker was a negro, and his skin was the color of charcoal." Lander's Travels in Africa, Vol.
    II., page 79.
    , @Malla

    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures.
     
    Photo shopped pictures? LOL Oh my God!!! SMH.....Ok I will provide videos
    Here is a video of Indian cricket bowler Ajit Agarkar with his wife, the third highest wicket taker in Indian cricket history.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFJw87KmBAs

    Here is ex President of the Republic of India, Pranab Mukherjee giving a speech at a ultra nationslist RSS event

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC1RuXCdeBY
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    Who’s behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.
     
    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They've created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.

    Rather than a vast Jewish conspiracy to promote race-mixing, the Jews have actually enforced a sort of Jim Crow media. For example, Barack Obama was conceived in 1960. But in 1960 a black man and a white woman couldn't be in the same room together on television. The so-called Jewish media has always lagged far behind the real world in terms of interracial couplings.

    For your Jewish masters you guys are just weapons to be used against Whitey. When a major race war takes place, the blackie will be getting bashed by Whitey while the remote controllers of blacky, the Jooie will run scot free.

    The Tall Israeli That Runs The Rap Industry

    Dr. E. Michael Jones on the Black/Jewish Alliance and Destabilization

    Minister Louis Farrakhan – Black Entertainers Under Jewish Remote Control

    Jewish Financed Gangster Rap Music is Psychological Warfare

    Malcolm X on Jews

    For your Jewish massas you guys are just mere tools. On the slave ships the Jews were the massas, they are still your massas. Black people never left no plantation. When you came to America from Nigeria, you entered a plantation. Come to think about it, the whole world is a plantation it seems.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent.
     
    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc... more than 150000 years ago at the least. Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures. Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them. The OOA migrants left Africa 80,000 years ago and even 40,000 years ago there was a back migration of Caucasians into Africa and for the next 32,000 years there were no Negroids around. The Negroid race was not even formed yet.
    Ancestors of Negroids have absorbed genes from archaic primitive populations as late as 150,000 years ago and those genes are not found in Out of Africa (OOA) populations.The OOA populations left 80,000 years ago but there is no history of these genes absorbed by Negroids, 150,000 years ago. How is that possible? Obviously the two populations (OOA populations and ancestors of Negroids/Khoi Sans etc..) had separated ATLEAST 150,000 years ago. Even unique Khoi San genes are not found in OOA populations.

    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc… more than 150000 years ago at the least.

    You’re a scientifically illiterate buffoon. There is no “branching away” in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.

    Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures.

    You have no idea what they looked like. What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification. There are no “Caucasian facial structures” that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa. Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.

    Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them.

    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations. But, again, that doesn’t indicate discrete differentiation because those are superficial traits that are modulated by relatively few genes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    There is no “branching away” in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.
     
    My God, you are a low IQ monkey of What?

    Watch the video again, you fool

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjpIqzGrFR8

    There is a branching away you stupid fool. The Negroid races it seems is a very recent creation and the Caucasoid race is much much older than the Negroid.


    What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.
     
    The stupidity of this fool can make one cry. We know their skull structures. You have a Negroid skull structure that looks very different from a person with Caucasoid skull structure. they LOOKED NOTHING like you because, people who looked like you did not even exist for at least more 72,000 years after the Caucasoids left Africa fro Eureasia. These people who left Africa and then came back again had nothing to do with Negroids. Watch the video again, there were many races in Africa and many have become extinct. We have lost a lot of diversity. There were many parallel races living in Africa and your ancestors who did not yet look like you were living parallel with the Caucasians. Your ancestors inbred with some primitive humanoids some 150,000 years ago but these genes are not found in Eurasians.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification
     
    Yes that is true. It is a language group but it is sometimes used racially w.r.t Khoi San and the Pgymies. Bantus are taller than pygmies, in that sense.

    There are no “Caucasian facial structures” that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa.
     
    Of course there is a Caucasian skull structure which is very different from your skull structure. Ask any forensic department guy in your police department and he will tell you there is. The difference in between Europeans and Africans is NOT ONLY Skin colour. If that is what you idiots believe, you are failures in science.

    Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.
     
    Nope. Only blacks have descended from black people. Blacks have higher genetic variability because your ancestors have bred with more primitive humans living in Africa and Europeans or Asians do not have those genes in them. You do not have the genes to create White people.

    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations.
     
    No dummy, watch the video again. White skin is not the only difference in between black negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Skeletal structures are very different as well.
    , @Truth
    Is the Bromance off already?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Bliss says:
    @Okechukwu

    Who’s behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.
     
    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They've created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.

    Rather than a vast Jewish conspiracy to promote race-mixing, the Jews have actually enforced a sort of Jim Crow media. For example, Barack Obama was conceived in 1960. But in 1960 a black man and a white woman couldn't be in the same room together on television. The so-called Jewish media has always lagged far behind the real world in terms of interracial couplings.

    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.

    This silly slave is seriously screwed up. You really have to wonder what he sees when he looks in the mirror. It’s hilarious to see a non-white so emotionally invested in Nazi race fantasies.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They’ve created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.

    Exactly. And it continues to this day. Including among the most vocal leaders of the racist alt-right such as Reed, Derbyshire, Anglin et al. Many of the alt-right members of this forum are posting from Japan, Philippines, China, Thailand, Mexico etc where they went to pursue their sexual fetish for non-white women.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    Exactly. And it continues to this day. Including among the most vocal leaders of the racist alt-right such as Reed, Derbyshire, Anglin et al. Many of the alt-right members of this forum are posting from Japan, Philippines, China, Thailand, Mexico etc where they went to pursue their sexual fetish for non-white women.
     
    Yep. And all the interracial porn that floods the world is there to satiate those fetishes. Whites are virtually the only consumers of that stuff. The market was created for them and they're the ones that keep it lucrative.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent.
     
    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc... more than 150000 years ago at the least. Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures. Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them. The OOA migrants left Africa 80,000 years ago and even 40,000 years ago there was a back migration of Caucasians into Africa and for the next 32,000 years there were no Negroids around. The Negroid race was not even formed yet.
    Ancestors of Negroids have absorbed genes from archaic primitive populations as late as 150,000 years ago and those genes are not found in Out of Africa (OOA) populations.The OOA populations left 80,000 years ago but there is no history of these genes absorbed by Negroids, 150,000 years ago. How is that possible? Obviously the two populations (OOA populations and ancestors of Negroids/Khoi Sans etc..) had separated ATLEAST 150,000 years ago. Even unique Khoi San genes are not found in OOA populations.

    those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc

    The idiot still doesn’t get it. Where the hell did you learn the absurd idea that a branch has “nothing to do” with what it branched away from?

    You should stick to regurgitating the 19th century racial pseudoscience that you learned at Stormfront. That clearly impresses the racist trash here, and gets you off too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Where the hell did you learn the absurd idea that a branch has “nothing to do” with what it branched away from?
     
    The branch which branched out to become Negroids eventually were not the people who left Africa during OOA. They stayed behind and intermated with more primitive archaic humans in Africa and non blacks do not have those genes of those archaic populations. That is what I meant. There were many races living concurrently in Africa and many of them became extinct (that scientist said, we have lost a lot of diversity). But none of them looked like today's black Negroid people. The Negroid looking people are relatively very recent.

    ou should stick to regurgitating the 19th century racial pseudoscience that you learned at Stormfront. That clearly impresses the racist trash here, and gets you off too.
     
    My god, what is wrong with the man? Where is Stormfront? Where is 13th century?
    This is from latest the latest scientific research which is coming out. WATCH the video again.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. Okechukwu says:
    @Bliss

    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.
     
    This silly slave is seriously screwed up. You really have to wonder what he sees when he looks in the mirror. It’s hilarious to see a non-white so emotionally invested in Nazi race fantasies.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They’ve created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.
     
    Exactly. And it continues to this day. Including among the most vocal leaders of the racist alt-right such as Reed, Derbyshire, Anglin et al. Many of the alt-right members of this forum are posting from Japan, Philippines, China, Thailand, Mexico etc where they went to pursue their sexual fetish for non-white women.

    Exactly. And it continues to this day. Including among the most vocal leaders of the racist alt-right such as Reed, Derbyshire, Anglin et al. Many of the alt-right members of this forum are posting from Japan, Philippines, China, Thailand, Mexico etc where they went to pursue their sexual fetish for non-white women.

    Yep. And all the interracial porn that floods the world is there to satiate those fetishes. Whites are virtually the only consumers of that stuff. The market was created for them and they’re the ones that keep it lucrative.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bombercommand
    Wrong. The major consumers of interracial porn are black guys. And what a surprise, the porn is all black guys with white women. I wonder what black women think of the brothers all too obvious fetish? It is understandable that black guys consume huge amounts of interracial porn, because the chance of a black guy getting a white girl is close to zero. Okechukwu, you don't want to hear what white girls say about black guys.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Malla says:
    @Bliss
    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures. Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins. A few minutes of googling exposes his deceit:

    Pranab Mukherjee with his wife:

    https://images.firstpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Pranab-wife-pti-new.jpg

    Amit Agarkar, on the right:

    https://images.livehindustan.com/uploadimage/library/2017/11/11/16_9/16_9_1/ms_dhoni_and_ajit_agarkar_1510394419.jpg

    Sathya Sai Baba:

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ryUYxIcUOdQ/Utbh7fVEBUI/AAAAAAAADuI/1Ztwndttv_o/s1600/IMG_1728+(1).JPG

    My god!!! Really? Nordicist? Really? You need to go and get your head checked. You have some mental issues? The pictures I posted were Nordic? They look like Swedes? What are you smoking? And these people you posted are black? What is wrong with your head? Seriously.
    We Indians consider ourselves Indians neither blacks nor Whites. But mostly we call ourselves brown. No Light skinned Indian will consider an European closer to him than a dark skinned Indian and no dark skinned Indian will consider himself closer to a black African than a light skinned Indian. When the African students were attacked in Bangalore, in South India, every Indian considered them foreigners. Just like how White people or East Asians or Arabs (who actually look the most similar to us) would be called foreigners.
    The poster ‘Peasant’ is right. you black people are obsessed with skin colour. Very weird

    BTW this is another picture of Agarkar. Yup he looks like your typical Zambian.

    This is Pranab Mukherjee with Ghanians on his official trip to Ghana

    Now check out Shashi Tharoor, Member of Parliament of India, elected from SOUTH INDIA (elected from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala),

    Here is Shashi Tharoor with UN Secretary general Kofi Annan

    Ya rite…..

    You Afrocentrists are desperate to have us in your team. LOL That is soooo pathetic. I am gonna tell my friends about it tomorrow. They are gonna laugh like hell when I tell you about your desperation to have us on your team and your obsession with the SKIN COLOUR of our Hindu Gods. Never before in their lives would they have given thought about this subject. Honestly dude, this is funny as hell. How pathetic……
    But I know what this is really about. So you can claim our civilization for yourself. Classic Cultural appropriation. So some hoodrat dope head in some American slum will shout out ‘We biz kengs and quuuens of India and sheet! ‘ That is what this is all about, is it not?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. Malla says:
    @Bliss
    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures. Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins. A few minutes of googling exposes his deceit:

    Pranab Mukherjee with his wife:

    https://images.firstpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Pranab-wife-pti-new.jpg

    Amit Agarkar, on the right:

    https://images.livehindustan.com/uploadimage/library/2017/11/11/16_9/16_9_1/ms_dhoni_and_ajit_agarkar_1510394419.jpg

    Sathya Sai Baba:

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ryUYxIcUOdQ/Utbh7fVEBUI/AAAAAAAADuI/1Ztwndttv_o/s1600/IMG_1728+(1).JPG

    Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins.

    This is the problem with these Afrocentrist idiots. No Hindu cares about the skin colour of their Gods in that way you Afrocentrist nutbags think about. Afrocentrists sickos are more concerned about the skin colours of our Gods than we are. If I tell this to my Indians friends they would die laughing. They would say, you guys need to get a life. I do not think me or any of my hindu friend EVER cared about the colour of our Gods, NEVER.

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.

    ” THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated, and women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree, in
    hopes of producing that effect. To my eye the dark color is much more agreeable than the tawny hue of the half-caste, which that of the Makoloto ladies closely resembles. The women generally escape the fever, but they are less fruitful than formerly ; and to their complaint of being undervalued on account of the disproportion of the sexes, they now add their regrets at the want of children, of whom they are all excessively fond.” Livingstone’s Africa, page 204.

    ” Katema, the ruler of the village, asked if I could not make a dress for him like the one I wore, so that he might appear as a white man when any stranger visited him.” Livingstone’s Africa,
    page 517.

    ” The people under Bango are divided into a number of classes. There are his councillors, as the highest, who are generally head men of several villages, and the carriers, the lowest freemen.
    One class above the last obtains the privilege of wearing shoes from the chief by paying for it ; another, the soldiers or militia, pay for the privilege of serving, the advantage being that they are not afterward liable to be made carriers. They are also divided into gentlemen and little gentlemen, and, though quite black, speak of themselves as white men, and of others who may not wear shoes, as ‘ blacks.’ The men of all these classes trust to their wives for food, and spend most of their time in drinking the palm-toddy.” Livingstone’s Africa, page 445.

    ” Zuma, a rich widow of Wava, the owner of a thousand slaves, told me that her husband had been dead these ten years ; that she had only one son, and he was darker than herself; that she loved white men, and would go to Boussa with me.” Clappertori’s Africa, Vol. IV., page 222.

    ” The Foulahs evidently consider all the negro natives as then inferiors; and, when talking of different nations, always rank themselves among the white people.” Mungo Park’s Travels in
    Africa, page 23.

    ” The women are well disposed toward strangers of fair complexion, apparently with the permission of their husbands.” Burton’s Africa, page 216.

    “The Kaffirs believe that white men can do anything.” Baldwins Africa, page 266.

    ” The negro Mohammedans worship God under the name of Allah ; they acknowledge Mohammed as a prophet, but do not pay him divine honors; they have some traditions respecting Jesus Christ, whom they call Nale, the son of Malek, and whom they speak of as a great prophet, who had wrought wondrous miracles. They denounce as impious the doctrine that God could have
    carnal conversation with a woman, but have a prophecy of their own :that some day they shall be all subdued by a white people.” Readers Savage Africa, page 354.

    “The European stranger, travelling in their country, is expected to patronize their wives and daughters ; and they feel hurt, as if dishonored, by his refusing to gratify them. The custom is very
    prevalent along this coast. At Gaboon, perhaps it reaches the acme ; there a man will in one breath offer the choice between his wife, sister, and daughter. The women of course do as they are bid by the men, and they consider all familiarity with a white man a high honor.” Hutchinsori’s Western Africa, Vol. II., page 24.

    ” ‘ I know the white men, too, said the prince, they are good men ; in fact I have reason to speak well of them, for I also am a white man, and therefore I am of opinion that they are of the same
    blood as ourselves.’
    It is in this manner that Falatahs endeavor to claim relationship with Europeans, though these people are either of a swarthy complexion or black as soot ; and this passion to be considered fair is often carried to a most ridiculous height. White men, how sorry soever their outward appearance may be, are certainly considered, not only by Falatahs, but by the native blacks, as a superior order of beings, in all respects more excellent than themselves. At Yaoorie we recollect having overheard a conversation between two men, who were quarrelling in the very height of passion. ‘ What!’ exclaimed one of them to his fellow, ‘ thou pitiful son of a black ant ! dost thou presume to say that a horse was my father ? Look at these Christians ! for as
    they are, I am ; and such were my ancestors ; answer me not, I say, for I am a white man ! ‘ The speaker was a negro, and his skin was the color of charcoal.” Lander’s Travels in Africa, Vol.
    II., page 79.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.
     
    Radhika Parameswaran on 'colorism' in India

    https://www.cmc.edu/keck-center/asia-experts-forum/radhika-parameswaran-on-colorism-in-india

    Bleached girls: India and its love for light skin

    https://theconversation.com/bleached-girls-india-and-its-love-for-light-skin-80655

    Growing Up With India’s Light-Skinned Beauty Standards

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/literally-darling/growing-up-with-indias-light-skinned-beauty-standards_b_8294810.html

    What Colorism Feels Like as an Indian-American Woman

    https://www.teenvogue.com/story/colorism-as-an-indian-american-woman

    India and Colorism: The Finer Nuance

    https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1553&context=law_globalstudies

    How Internalized Colorism Works In India. Dark Still Isn't Beautiful

    https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2017/07/internalized-colorism/


    THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated
     
    Nothing could be further from the truth. Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning. A white supermodel type making first contact with African villagers would've been considered grotesquely ugly. Even today, amid the onslaught of western culture, very light skin isn't particularly valued among black Africans. A medium brown skin tone is still the ideal of beauty.

    women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree
     
    You don't know Africans very well if you actually believe this claptrap. Indeed, the opposite is true. An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men. In fact it's backed up by science.

    Study: Men and women view mixed-race male faces as more attractive than White faces

    A new study in The Journal of General Psychology has found evidence that faces of mixed racial phenotypes are perceived as more attractive than stereotypically White and Black faces.

    https://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-men-women-view-mixed-race-male-faces-attractive-white-faces-50614

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. Malla says:
    @anonymous
    "And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead."

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.

    " He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. "

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler - , everyone knows that Russia isn't an independent country and that Russia is controlled by the same force that controls USA, GB, France etc...Putin best friend is the the king of Israel.
    Maybe in the 30's it was the same. Except that the mafia state didn't exist at the time

    " Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire".

    Later in life ? Can you give a date ?

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.

    Why ? Again , because Hitler had great admiration for the British empire and because like his "friend" - the great war criminal Churchill - he believed that Indians were inferiors and they needed a white master.

    Your admiration for the man is really bizarre...Because I don't think you believe that you belong to an inferior race. Do you ?

    Do you also admire that great war criminal and the greatest English hero of all time - Sir Winston Churchill , and who despised Indians ?

    "But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich."

    No doubt about that...But that isn't reason for you or anyone else to consider the guy as a kind of hero because he tried to save the white race or he fought for the white race.

    As usual, follow the money. If you follow the money, you will understand that Hitler /Nazi Party had a master.

    In spite of Hollywood movies, there was no doubt that Germany was condemned to lose that war.

    The enemy was inside Germany and some high ranking Nazis were working for Germany's defeat.

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.

    Hitler really did not want a war with the British. He thought that the British would come to their senses (which they did not) and that the British people would have a better opinion of him for his magnanimous act. But of course the press was controlled by the elites and they spun the whole thing around as a marvelous daring escape. LOL. The Germans could have crushed those allied forces there and then. It was the media. He was so desperate to not have a war with the British, who he considered the brother people of the Germans that he sent Rudolf Hess, second in command in the Third Reich. But we all know what happened with him/

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler – , everyone knows that Russia isn’t an independent country

    Yup it looks like Russia is a fake opposition to the West today.

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.

    Jew propaganda has fooled us all for too long, brother.

    Where do you even get such info? Hitler met him, promised to help him but only after the Wehrmacht conquers the Soviet Union. How would the Germans reach India without conquering the Soviet Union? If they had conquered the Soviet Union, Iran was a friend of Germany. The Iranian leader was pro National Socialist, there was a Nazi movement in Iran. So then via Iran/Persia, they could come to India and fight the British forces in India.
    Subhash Chnadra Bose raised an army in the Wehrmacht from POWs from the British Indian Army called the Indian Legion, Indische Legion and there were even Indians in the SS Wafen, Indian Volunteer Legion of the Waffen-SS, Indische Freiwilligen Legion der Waffen-SS.
    But since the war against the Soviets was dragging on, Hitler advised Bose to take a submarine to go to Japan and continue his struggle there. Thus Bose traveled on a U boat to Madagascar where he was transferred to a Japanese submarine and we went to Tokyo where the Japanese government agreed to support him against the British. It is in Singapore that he raised a new Army called the INA from POWs from the British Indian Army. Strangely in Burma, the Indian troops of the INA (Indian national Army) supported by Japanese forces fought Indian troops of the British Indian Army supported by British forces.

    This video will explain everything.

    Also Indian volunteers in the Wehrmacht and SS Waffen

    There were also Muslim Waffen SS division

    Mostly French Algerian Army POWs and Bosnians/Albanians etc….

    When the German command planned to include Indian Muslim troops of the Waffen SS into the Muslim divisions, the Indian Muslims complained that they saw themselves as Indians first and they were retained in the Indian divisions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    "Yup it looks like Russia is a fake opposition to the West today."

    I think it's a reasonable conclusion. Russia it the "best enemy money can buy".

    Western MIC needs a powerful enemy. Russia is that enemy.

    Thank you for the video. I was wrong. I don't know where I read that stuff about Bose...or maybe I never read it and it's my memory playing tricks on me.

    You didn't answer my two questions.


    It's then correct to conclude that you do admire Hitler and Churchill even though you know that they despised your race ?

    Well, I suppose that is possible. We can even call it love. We don't need to hate those who hate us, to despise those who despise us.

    But if that is true - you do admire the two war criminals and white supremacists- then one can say that you have more in common with blacks that are obsessed with their skin colour than you think.

    You suffer from alienation. In that case you should do something about it.

    You see, reading your posts (some very interesting) , I thought you were interested in facts/truth.

    And facts tell us that white civilization is a great civilization. Which, of course isn't incompatible with fact that that civilization committed great crimes. All civilizations did.

    Slavery wouldn't have been possible w/o participation of blacks themselves. Blacks aren't victims.

    Children are victims. Adults that are not stupid should accept responsibility for their actions.

    And blacks (lots of them) suffer from alienation. Michael Jackson was so sick (alienation) that he became "white". That of course didn't have any impact on millions of blacks. They still love the guy.

    As they still love the black Don Corleone -Barack Obama -, who, as all american war criminals(former presidents) were put in power by the tribe. Blacks of course believe that was their achievement. If you are black and not stupid you would be proud of someone that burned that house and not of someone that entered it to serve the devil.

    All this to say that if it's really exact you admire Churchill and Hitler, you also suffer from alienation as lots of black folks.

    That would be a pity. I hope I'm wrong.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Them Guys says:
    @TheJester

    Allowing them [Bantu Africans] in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.
     
    Well said, Stan d Mute.

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia. (Affirmative action jobs must pay well. I talking about a social phenomenon in some of the richest counties in the United States.) These marriages make sense in a way. Given the alternative, I can imagine what transpires over morning coffee between a White feminist who hates White men and one of the White men she hates.

    On the other hand, White feminists who hate White men and Black power males who hate White men have a lot in common. Their back-and-forth over morning coffee must provide both of them a cathartic effect as they vent their anger against a common enemy.

    However, I'm wondering if many of these White feminists will become disillusioned when Black male domestic violence, as happened to Rachel Dolezal, starts to rear its ugly head. There is also the question of whether shared anger is a viable basis for a stable marriage.

    Although somewhat dated, a 2000 NYT article reports that Blacks commit domestic violence at almost triple the rate of Whites.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/18/us/study-shows-a-racial-divide-in-domestic-violence-cases.html

    TheJester: Keep in mind, that of all those White women, especially the femNazis feminist types, many, many if not most are actually Jewish women. Or 1/2 Jewish. And you cannot just go by names and last names, due to Jews being famous for doing name changes in order to “fit” as a European whitey and fool others. Name changes, nationality changes, race changes and religious conversions…Fake, False, Fraudulent in many cases.

    This is done, without a doubt, if one just looks at how everything has gone so far the past 100 yrs in usa and several hundred years in EU nations, in order to Hide their Jewishness, and they know sooner or later that proverbial Cat will get out of the Bag, and expose them fully. So if they can convince most peoples of being a European White women, then when the truth and facts come out and things turn for the worse….It will always be, European Whites who get Blamed!…Never Jews get blamed…Take issue of Slavery as just one small example of this phenomenon. Mostly done by Jewry, yet who gets blamed always? European Whites get blamed always…In fact until I discovered this Jewish slavery connection, online Via many articles and proofs, I don’t ever recall hearing Anyone ever blame even a single Jew for slavery in usa or elsewhere. I am 65 yrs old, heard whitey blamed for every slavery issue always and all my life..yet never heard a single mention of Blame a Jew for slavery. Not until aprox 12-15 yrs ago when first discovered vast Jewish connections. Most people still know zero of this factoid. Most also refuse to believe its true too.

    So, now consider all the many other issues and events euro whitey gets blamed for, which actually was done by and for and profited by Jews….The Main question is always…”But, is it Good for Jews?” If Yes, then go for it always…and whenever possible Use whitey as a scape goat for later on blames.

    Also, most every entity and org, such as, NAACP-ACLU-Feminists lefty’s-Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism-AIPAC-and over 300 Other Jewish Orgs within usa-and most every Marxist teaching along with communism itself…ALL was Invented by, Run By, Funded By, Profited from By….Jews. And always promoted as some form or type of Great Goodness for Blacks, Females, School kiddies aka wont you just do it…for….them..CHILDREN Please!…while in reality, any form of goodness intentions never ever existed at all…Except of course good for…Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins.
     
    This is the problem with these Afrocentrist idiots. No Hindu cares about the skin colour of their Gods in that way you Afrocentrist nutbags think about. Afrocentrists sickos are more concerned about the skin colours of our Gods than we are. If I tell this to my Indians friends they would die laughing. They would say, you guys need to get a life. I do not think me or any of my hindu friend EVER cared about the colour of our Gods, NEVER.

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.

    " THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated, and women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree, in
    hopes of producing that effect. To my eye the dark color is much more agreeable than the tawny hue of the half-caste, which that of the Makoloto ladies closely resembles. The women generally escape the fever, but they are less fruitful than formerly ; and to their complaint of being undervalued on account of the disproportion of the sexes, they now add their regrets at the want of children, of whom they are all excessively fond." Livingstone's Africa, page 204.

    " Katema, the ruler of the village, asked if I could not make a dress for him like the one I wore, so that he might appear as a white man when any stranger visited him." Livingstone's Africa,
    page 517.

    " The people under Bango are divided into a number of classes. There are his councillors, as the highest, who are generally head men of several villages, and the carriers, the lowest freemen.
    One class above the last obtains the privilege of wearing shoes from the chief by paying for it ; another, the soldiers or militia, pay for the privilege of serving, the advantage being that they are not afterward liable to be made carriers. They are also divided into gentlemen and little gentlemen, and, though quite black, speak of themselves as white men, and of others who may not wear shoes, as ' blacks.' The men of all these classes trust to their wives for food, and spend most of their time in drinking the palm-toddy." Livingstone's Africa, page 445.

    " Zuma, a rich widow of Wava, the owner of a thousand slaves, told me that her husband had been dead these ten years ; that she had only one son, and he was darker than herself; that she loved white men, and would go to Boussa with me." Clappertori's Africa, Vol. IV., page 222.

    " The Foulahs evidently consider all the negro natives as then inferiors; and, when talking of different nations, always rank themselves among the white people." Mungo Park's Travels in
    Africa, page 23.

    " The women are well disposed toward strangers of fair complexion, apparently with the permission of their husbands." Burton's Africa, page 216.

    "The Kaffirs believe that white men can do anything." Baldwins Africa, page 266.

    " The negro Mohammedans worship God under the name of Allah ; they acknowledge Mohammed as a prophet, but do not pay him divine honors; they have some traditions respecting Jesus Christ, whom they call Nale, the son of Malek, and whom they speak of as a great prophet, who had wrought wondrous miracles. They denounce as impious the doctrine that God could have
    carnal conversation with a woman, but have a prophecy of their own :that some day they shall be all subdued by a white people." Readers Savage Africa, page 354.

    "The European stranger, travelling in their country, is expected to patronize their wives and daughters ; and they feel hurt, as if dishonored, by his refusing to gratify them. The custom is very
    prevalent along this coast. At Gaboon, perhaps it reaches the acme ; there a man will in one breath offer the choice between his wife, sister, and daughter. The women of course do as they are bid by the men, and they consider all familiarity with a white man a high honor." Hutchinsori's Western Africa, Vol. II., page 24.

    " ' I know the white men, too, said the prince, they are good men ; in fact I have reason to speak well of them, for I also am a white man, and therefore I am of opinion that they are of the same
    blood as ourselves.'
    It is in this manner that Falatahs endeavor to claim relationship with Europeans, though these people are either of a swarthy complexion or black as soot ; and this passion to be considered fair is often carried to a most ridiculous height. White men, how sorry soever their outward appearance may be, are certainly considered, not only by Falatahs, but by the native blacks, as a superior order of beings, in all respects more excellent than themselves. At Yaoorie we recollect having overheard a conversation between two men, who were quarrelling in the very height of passion. ' What!' exclaimed one of them to his fellow, ' thou pitiful son of a black ant ! dost thou presume to say that a horse was my father ? Look at these Christians ! for as
    they are, I am ; and such were my ancestors ; answer me not, I say, for I am a white man ! ' The speaker was a negro, and his skin was the color of charcoal." Lander's Travels in Africa, Vol.
    II., page 79.

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.

    Radhika Parameswaran on ‘colorism’ in India

    https://www.cmc.edu/keck-center/asia-experts-forum/radhika-parameswaran-on-colorism-in-india

    Bleached girls: India and its love for light skin

    https://theconversation.com/bleached-girls-india-and-its-love-for-light-skin-80655

    Growing Up With India’s Light-Skinned Beauty Standards

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/literally-darling/growing-up-with-indias-light-skinned-beauty-standards_b_8294810.html

    What Colorism Feels Like as an Indian-American Woman

    https://www.teenvogue.com/story/colorism-as-an-indian-american-woman

    India and Colorism: The Finer Nuance

    https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1553&context=law_globalstudies

    How Internalized Colorism Works In India. Dark Still Isn’t Beautiful

    https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2017/07/internalized-colorism/

    THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated

    Nothing could be further from the truth. Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning. A white supermodel type making first contact with African villagers would’ve been considered grotesquely ugly. Even today, amid the onslaught of western culture, very light skin isn’t particularly valued among black Africans. A medium brown skin tone is still the ideal of beauty.

    women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree

    You don’t know Africans very well if you actually believe this claptrap. Indeed, the opposite is true. An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men. In fact it’s backed up by science.

    Study: Men and women view mixed-race male faces as more attractive than White faces

    A new study in The Journal of General Psychology has found evidence that faces of mixed racial phenotypes are perceived as more attractive than stereotypically White and Black faces.

    https://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-men-women-view-mixed-race-male-faces-attractive-white-faces-50614

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Blacks in those days or some black tribes had such preferences. What can I say?
    , @Malla

    An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men.
     
    Yup, as per the master plan. I am not surprised at all. The elites want to negrify the White race using their media command, to make a future dumber brown race who will be their good goyim slaves.
    Who was it? Yes Israel Cohen, a Jewish commie, who said
    "We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."
    https://www.henrymakow.com/the_book_the_bankers_made_disa.html

    We also have the Kalergi plan

    https://henrymakow.com/upload_images/CR.jpg

    Yup the same tactic they have been using from time immemorial to destroy so many civilizations. Repeated again in USof A too. History repeats itself.

    , @Malla

    Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning.
     
    Their observations, if you read the whole books, seem quite honest and fair. So I am sure they wrote what they saw, they wrote the truth accurately.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc… more than 150000 years ago at the least.
     
    You're a scientifically illiterate buffoon. There is no "branching away" in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.

    Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures.
     
    You have no idea what they looked like. What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification. There are no "Caucasian facial structures" that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa. Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.


    Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them.
     
    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations. But, again, that doesn’t indicate discrete differentiation because those are superficial traits that are modulated by relatively few genes.

    There is no “branching away” in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.

    My God, you are a low IQ monkey of What?

    Watch the video again, you fool

    There is a branching away you stupid fool. The Negroid races it seems is a very recent creation and the Caucasoid race is much much older than the Negroid.

    What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.

    The stupidity of this fool can make one cry. We know their skull structures. You have a Negroid skull structure that looks very different from a person with Caucasoid skull structure. they LOOKED NOTHING like you because, people who looked like you did not even exist for at least more 72,000 years after the Caucasoids left Africa fro Eureasia. These people who left Africa and then came back again had nothing to do with Negroids. Watch the video again, there were many races in Africa and many have become extinct. We have lost a lot of diversity. There were many parallel races living in Africa and your ancestors who did not yet look like you were living parallel with the Caucasians. Your ancestors inbred with some primitive humanoids some 150,000 years ago but these genes are not found in Eurasians.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification

    Yes that is true. It is a language group but it is sometimes used racially w.r.t Khoi San and the Pgymies. Bantus are taller than pygmies, in that sense.

    There are no “Caucasian facial structures” that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa.

    Of course there is a Caucasian skull structure which is very different from your skull structure. Ask any forensic department guy in your police department and he will tell you there is. The difference in between Europeans and Africans is NOT ONLY Skin colour. If that is what you idiots believe, you are failures in science.

    Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.

    Nope. Only blacks have descended from black people. Blacks have higher genetic variability because your ancestors have bred with more primitive humans living in Africa and Europeans or Asians do not have those genes in them. You do not have the genes to create White people.

    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations.

    No dummy, watch the video again. White skin is not the only difference in between black negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Skeletal structures are very different as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    My God, you are a low IQ monkey of What?
     
    A hairy Indian has no business calling a black person a monkey. Many of you are damn near as hairy as monkeys. That's physical evidences of your closeness to monkeys and our distance from them.

    Watch the video again, you fool
     
    Great. Your source is a homemade YouTube video from a broken-English spewing white supremacist goon from some Eastern European goat-herding village. Just when I think you couldn't be any dumber, you exceed my expectations.

    There is a branching away you stupid fool. The Negroid races it seems is a very recent creation and the Caucasoid race is much much older than the Negroid.
     
    Caucasoids are part of the Negroid race, you unscientific asswipe. They are a mere sampling of black African diversity that through tiny tweaks in DNA developed the features commonly associated with Caucasians today. For example, the mutation that’s responsible for the light skin of Europeans is a single tweak about 8000 years ago in a gene known as SLC24A5. Guess where this gene originated. Well, sub-Saharan Africans also carry this gene except they have a G where Europeans have an A. This one tiny substitution (from G to A) is responsible for white skin.

    The stupidity of this fool can make one cry. We know their skull structures. You have a Negroid skull structure that looks very different from a person with Caucasoid skull structure.
     
    That may be true. But my skull structure is also distinct from many other sub-Saharan African phenotypes, which themselves are convergent with Caucasian phenotypes. As such, there is no such thing as a Negroid skull.

    Of course there is a Caucasian skull structure which is very different from your skull structure. Ask any forensic department guy in your police department and he will tell you there is.
     
    Forensic anthropologists CANNOT divine race from skulls or bones, dummy. Forensic anthropologists in law enforcement can make an inference based on the circumstantial evidence in the vicinity of the specimen. Otherwise it's little more than random assignment. So tell me, if we have a skeleton from a person who was 1/4 Nigerian, 1/4 Norwegian, 1/4 Japanese and 1/4 Moroccan, to which race do you assign his bones?

    Nope. Only blacks have descended from black people. Blacks have higher genetic variability because your ancestors have bred with more primitive humans living in Africa and Europeans or Asians do not have those genes in them. You do not have the genes to create White people.
     
    Haha. You gotta love Stormfront "science." Man, you are one stupid and delusional motherfucker.

    Here's the thing, my dimwitted hindu friend, Africans have greater genetic diversity because the Out of Africa migrants were just a small subset of the population, taking with them just a fraction of the continent's genetic diversity. It's pretty simple to figure out, unless you're an idiot.

    No dummy, watch the video again. White skin is not the only difference in between black negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Skeletal structures are very different as well.
     
    Yeah, you and the uploader of the video would be laughed out of any scientific conference you were crazy enough to present your "research" at. Stick to the pseudocientific community on YouTube and the dark web. Do not, and I repeat, do not ever try to circulate this junk in the real world. You are literally spouting Mortonian phrenology that was utterly and thoroughly debunked in the 19th century.
    , @Bliss

    My God, you are a low IQ monkey
     
    Lol. Your God Hanuman, is a low IQ monkey? What kind of an idiot worships a monkey as God anyways?

    http://www.manishshukla.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/14650694_891770597622693_6232118375058311040_n.jpg

    Note how his monkey God is white skinned while the Indians worshipping him are blackish? That’s because the monkeys in India are pinkish white:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pIfvBGXArEE

    Many a white tourist in India is followed and harassed by laughing Mallas calling them monkeys. And then those same fools go and worship their monkey God Hanuman. Go figure...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.
     
    Radhika Parameswaran on 'colorism' in India

    https://www.cmc.edu/keck-center/asia-experts-forum/radhika-parameswaran-on-colorism-in-india

    Bleached girls: India and its love for light skin

    https://theconversation.com/bleached-girls-india-and-its-love-for-light-skin-80655

    Growing Up With India’s Light-Skinned Beauty Standards

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/literally-darling/growing-up-with-indias-light-skinned-beauty-standards_b_8294810.html

    What Colorism Feels Like as an Indian-American Woman

    https://www.teenvogue.com/story/colorism-as-an-indian-american-woman

    India and Colorism: The Finer Nuance

    https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1553&context=law_globalstudies

    How Internalized Colorism Works In India. Dark Still Isn't Beautiful

    https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2017/07/internalized-colorism/


    THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated
     
    Nothing could be further from the truth. Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning. A white supermodel type making first contact with African villagers would've been considered grotesquely ugly. Even today, amid the onslaught of western culture, very light skin isn't particularly valued among black Africans. A medium brown skin tone is still the ideal of beauty.

    women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree
     
    You don't know Africans very well if you actually believe this claptrap. Indeed, the opposite is true. An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men. In fact it's backed up by science.

    Study: Men and women view mixed-race male faces as more attractive than White faces

    A new study in The Journal of General Psychology has found evidence that faces of mixed racial phenotypes are perceived as more attractive than stereotypically White and Black faces.

    https://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-men-women-view-mixed-race-male-faces-attractive-white-faces-50614

    Blacks in those days or some black tribes had such preferences. What can I say?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. bj says:

    Empire Files: Anti-Black Racism Reveals Israel’s (Jewish) Supremacy

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Blacks for them are only weapons to be used to use against Whitey and to negrify the White race so that they can have their Machiah Raj over dumber brown goyim. Take my word, the North East Asians are next after YT. This is an old tactic (of their box full of tactics) they have used it from ancient times on many ancient civilizations.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc
     
    The idiot still doesn’t get it. Where the hell did you learn the absurd idea that a branch has “nothing to do” with what it branched away from?

    You should stick to regurgitating the 19th century racial pseudoscience that you learned at Stormfront. That clearly impresses the racist trash here, and gets you off too.

    Where the hell did you learn the absurd idea that a branch has “nothing to do” with what it branched away from?

    The branch which branched out to become Negroids eventually were not the people who left Africa during OOA. They stayed behind and intermated with more primitive archaic humans in Africa and non blacks do not have those genes of those archaic populations. That is what I meant. There were many races living concurrently in Africa and many of them became extinct (that scientist said, we have lost a lot of diversity). But none of them looked like today’s black Negroid people. The Negroid looking people are relatively very recent.

    ou should stick to regurgitating the 19th century racial pseudoscience that you learned at Stormfront. That clearly impresses the racist trash here, and gets you off too.

    My god, what is wrong with the man? Where is Stormfront? Where is 13th century?
    This is from latest the latest scientific research which is coming out. WATCH the video again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. Malla says:
    @Peasant
    'Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot'

    Cheddar man had been reconstructed earlier with white coloured skin. This reconstruction was just a politically correct version. The scientist who did the reconstruction is on record as saying nobody knows if he had dark skin or not.

    The funniest part is that skin colour is not race. There are many southern dravidian Indians darker than many Africans but who look down on them beacuse of Africans primitive features eg prognathism, smaller head size, low foreheads etc and also primitive behaviours eg violence.

    You see you use an example of Cheddar man to point out how African ancient Europeans were, not realsiing that Cheddar man's bone structure, facial composition and hairline are all caucasian. You would never maintain the middle easterners are sub saharan blacks and yet you think prehistoric Europeans were. They are both caucosoid- which most sub saharan blacks (the pure ones anyway-in prehistoric times there was substantial in migration of middle eastern dna into the horn of Africa area which is why there are generally more gracile than southern and west African blacks) are not.

    By the way cheddar man has living re
    latives in modern Britain:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5364983/amp/Retired-history-teacher-believes-looks-like-Cheddar-Man.html

    Cheddar man White (and in black photo clearly Caucasian):

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5453665/amp/Was-Cheddar-man-white-all.html

    African Albinos (skin colour is not race):

    https://www.cwporter.com/africanalb.htm

    My final comment:

    http://nelson-haha.api-meal.eu/

    p.s I saw a comment recently that blacks do not understand what race is and that they think it is just skin colour. They are so dumb as to have taken to heart the liberal mantra that we should not judge people on the colour of thier skin. As if skin colour was not an indication of less desirable traits rather than a bad trait itself (although blacks tend to dislike it and spend alot of money on lightening creams). Im glad I saw your comments as it reconfirmed what I already knew. Lol.

    I saw a comment recently that blacks do not understand what race is and that they think it is just skin colour. They are so dumb as to have taken to heart the liberal mantra that we should not judge people on the colour of thier skin.

    You are right, dude, these black people are weird. They really think race is just skin colour or that Europeans are just negroid blacks with White skin and that black Negroids are just Europeans with black skin. Crazy!!! There are so Many other physical difference in between the races.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss

    They really think race is just skin colour
     
    This is too funny coming from the servile Indian whack job who spends all his time exalting the white racists who confined Indians of all castes in the ghetto called Black Town in Calcutta. And who sent Indians as slaves to South Africa. Why do you think they call themselves white nationalists, white supremacists etc?

    This stupid shameless bugger is in deep, deep, denial and delusion.

    What’s your race Malla? You know that Indians are ASI, closely related to Papuans, Melanesians, Negritos, Timorese, Australian Aborigines, Andaman Islanders etc don’t you?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. bj says:

    Zionist Jews advocate diversity and inclusion in South Africa, Europe, and USA; but not in apartheid Israel. Perhaps, Ilana Mercer could pen Apartheid: The Truth About The Zionist Jew!

    ‘Israel apartheid state, settlements colonialism’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  171. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.
     
    Radhika Parameswaran on 'colorism' in India

    https://www.cmc.edu/keck-center/asia-experts-forum/radhika-parameswaran-on-colorism-in-india

    Bleached girls: India and its love for light skin

    https://theconversation.com/bleached-girls-india-and-its-love-for-light-skin-80655

    Growing Up With India’s Light-Skinned Beauty Standards

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/literally-darling/growing-up-with-indias-light-skinned-beauty-standards_b_8294810.html

    What Colorism Feels Like as an Indian-American Woman

    https://www.teenvogue.com/story/colorism-as-an-indian-american-woman

    India and Colorism: The Finer Nuance

    https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1553&context=law_globalstudies

    How Internalized Colorism Works In India. Dark Still Isn't Beautiful

    https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2017/07/internalized-colorism/


    THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated
     
    Nothing could be further from the truth. Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning. A white supermodel type making first contact with African villagers would've been considered grotesquely ugly. Even today, amid the onslaught of western culture, very light skin isn't particularly valued among black Africans. A medium brown skin tone is still the ideal of beauty.

    women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree
     
    You don't know Africans very well if you actually believe this claptrap. Indeed, the opposite is true. An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men. In fact it's backed up by science.

    Study: Men and women view mixed-race male faces as more attractive than White faces

    A new study in The Journal of General Psychology has found evidence that faces of mixed racial phenotypes are perceived as more attractive than stereotypically White and Black faces.

    https://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-men-women-view-mixed-race-male-faces-attractive-white-faces-50614

    An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men.

    Yup, as per the master plan. I am not surprised at all. The elites want to negrify the White race using their media command, to make a future dumber brown race who will be their good goyim slaves.
    Who was it? Yes Israel Cohen, a Jewish commie, who said
    We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

    https://www.henrymakow.com/the_book_the_bankers_made_disa.html

    We also have the Kalergi plan

    Yup the same tactic they have been using from time immemorial to destroy so many civilizations. Repeated again in USof A too. History repeats itself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    Yup, as per the master plan. I am not surprised at all. The elites want to negrify the White race using their media command, to make a future dumber brown race who will be their good goyim slaves.
     
    I don't think so, dummy.

    Mixed race people taller and smarter, study finds

    https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/ad_174324482-e1435915577690.jpg?quality=80&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=644%2C363
    This couple’s baby could hit the genetics jackpot

    Scientists from Edinburgh University examined the DNA of 350,000 people from different parts of the world and found that people with parents from diverse genetic backgrounds tend to be taller and have sharper thinking skills.

    https://metro.co.uk/2015/07/03/mixed-race-people-taller-and-smarter-study-says-5277767/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Malla says:
    @bj
    Empire Files: Anti-Black Racism Reveals Israel’s (Jewish) Supremacy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YtaYX7Rstc

    Blacks for them are only weapons to be used to use against Whitey and to negrify the White race so that they can have their Machiah Raj over dumber brown goyim. Take my word, the North East Asians are next after YT. This is an old tactic (of their box full of tactics) they have used it from ancient times on many ancient civilizations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Malla says:
    @Bliss
    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures. Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins. A few minutes of googling exposes his deceit:

    Pranab Mukherjee with his wife:

    https://images.firstpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Pranab-wife-pti-new.jpg

    Amit Agarkar, on the right:

    https://images.livehindustan.com/uploadimage/library/2017/11/11/16_9/16_9_1/ms_dhoni_and_ajit_agarkar_1510394419.jpg

    Sathya Sai Baba:

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ryUYxIcUOdQ/Utbh7fVEBUI/AAAAAAAADuI/1Ztwndttv_o/s1600/IMG_1728+(1).JPG

    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures.

    Photo shopped pictures? LOL Oh my God!!! SMH…..Ok I will provide videos
    Here is a video of Indian cricket bowler Ajit Agarkar with his wife, the third highest wicket taker in Indian cricket history.

    Here is ex President of the Republic of India, Pranab Mukherjee giving a speech at a ultra nationslist RSS event

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.
     
    Radhika Parameswaran on 'colorism' in India

    https://www.cmc.edu/keck-center/asia-experts-forum/radhika-parameswaran-on-colorism-in-india

    Bleached girls: India and its love for light skin

    https://theconversation.com/bleached-girls-india-and-its-love-for-light-skin-80655

    Growing Up With India’s Light-Skinned Beauty Standards

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/literally-darling/growing-up-with-indias-light-skinned-beauty-standards_b_8294810.html

    What Colorism Feels Like as an Indian-American Woman

    https://www.teenvogue.com/story/colorism-as-an-indian-american-woman

    India and Colorism: The Finer Nuance

    https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1553&context=law_globalstudies

    How Internalized Colorism Works In India. Dark Still Isn't Beautiful

    https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2017/07/internalized-colorism/


    THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated
     
    Nothing could be further from the truth. Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning. A white supermodel type making first contact with African villagers would've been considered grotesquely ugly. Even today, amid the onslaught of western culture, very light skin isn't particularly valued among black Africans. A medium brown skin tone is still the ideal of beauty.

    women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree
     
    You don't know Africans very well if you actually believe this claptrap. Indeed, the opposite is true. An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men. In fact it's backed up by science.

    Study: Men and women view mixed-race male faces as more attractive than White faces

    A new study in The Journal of General Psychology has found evidence that faces of mixed racial phenotypes are perceived as more attractive than stereotypically White and Black faces.

    https://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-men-women-view-mixed-race-male-faces-attractive-white-faces-50614

    Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning.

    Their observations, if you read the whole books, seem quite honest and fair. So I am sure they wrote what they saw, they wrote the truth accurately.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. @Okechukwu

    Exactly. And it continues to this day. Including among the most vocal leaders of the racist alt-right such as Reed, Derbyshire, Anglin et al. Many of the alt-right members of this forum are posting from Japan, Philippines, China, Thailand, Mexico etc where they went to pursue their sexual fetish for non-white women.
     
    Yep. And all the interracial porn that floods the world is there to satiate those fetishes. Whites are virtually the only consumers of that stuff. The market was created for them and they're the ones that keep it lucrative.

    Wrong. The major consumers of interracial porn are black guys. And what a surprise, the porn is all black guys with white women. I wonder what black women think of the brothers all too obvious fetish? It is understandable that black guys consume huge amounts of interracial porn, because the chance of a black guy getting a white girl is close to zero. Okechukwu, you don’t want to hear what white girls say about black guys.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    Wrong. The major consumers of interracial porn are black guys.
     
    The depth of your self-delusion is stunning. But, hey, whatever helps you sleep at night.

    I wonder what black women think of the brothers all too obvious fetish?
     
    White girls have chased after me since grade school. I wonder who really has the fetish.

    Okechukwu, you don’t want to hear what white girls say about black guys.
     
    Maybe I'll ask my white wife, who is a PhD but looks like a supermodel. And then I'll query all the white girls and women I've dated and fucked over the years and even their parents who also loved me. What do you think? Shall I?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    As I understand european gypsies came to Europe about five or six centuries ago , they were expelled from India . Do you know why they were expelled from India ? . Thanks
     
    Hey I do not know much about this. Sorry. But in India there are gypsies too. Called Banjaras. So either these nomadic banjaras simply went West and became gypsies. Or they were escaping the Islamic conquests of India. This is the most I can say.

    Gypsies may have left N India voluntarily after the Muslim conquest.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Gypsies may have left N India voluntarily after the Muslim conquest.
     
    Yes, that is a very good possibility.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    If memory serves, the USA abortion death count since Roe-v-Wade is ~65M.
     
    Good, but not good enough.

    Dead Black Babies are statistically the relative highest percentage, & close to the top numerically.
     
    Better, but still not good enough.

    ZPG, and screw you dumbass religionists.

    The fewer criminal welfare affirmative action orcs* there are, the better for Whites.

    * also known as obsolete farm equipment

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.
     
    Hitler really did not want a war with the British. He thought that the British would come to their senses (which they did not) and that the British people would have a better opinion of him for his magnanimous act. But of course the press was controlled by the elites and they spun the whole thing around as a marvelous daring escape. LOL. The Germans could have crushed those allied forces there and then. It was the media. He was so desperate to not have a war with the British, who he considered the brother people of the Germans that he sent Rudolf Hess, second in command in the Third Reich. But we all know what happened with him/

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler – , everyone knows that Russia isn’t an independent country
     
    Yup it looks like Russia is a fake opposition to the West today.

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.
     
    Jew propaganda has fooled us all for too long, brother.

    https://www.livemint.com/rf/Image-621x414/LiveMint/Period2/2017/05/27/Photos/Processed/[email protected]

    Where do you even get such info? Hitler met him, promised to help him but only after the Wehrmacht conquers the Soviet Union. How would the Germans reach India without conquering the Soviet Union? If they had conquered the Soviet Union, Iran was a friend of Germany. The Iranian leader was pro National Socialist, there was a Nazi movement in Iran. So then via Iran/Persia, they could come to India and fight the British forces in India.
    Subhash Chnadra Bose raised an army in the Wehrmacht from POWs from the British Indian Army called the Indian Legion, Indische Legion and there were even Indians in the SS Wafen, Indian Volunteer Legion of the Waffen-SS, Indische Freiwilligen Legion der Waffen-SS.
    But since the war against the Soviets was dragging on, Hitler advised Bose to take a submarine to go to Japan and continue his struggle there. Thus Bose traveled on a U boat to Madagascar where he was transferred to a Japanese submarine and we went to Tokyo where the Japanese government agreed to support him against the British. It is in Singapore that he raised a new Army called the INA from POWs from the British Indian Army. Strangely in Burma, the Indian troops of the INA (Indian national Army) supported by Japanese forces fought Indian troops of the British Indian Army supported by British forces.

    This video will explain everything.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBX1NsAoQ38

    Also Indian volunteers in the Wehrmacht and SS Waffen
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEhmgcXYGE0

    There were also Muslim Waffen SS division

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkKuJL6brB0
    Mostly French Algerian Army POWs and Bosnians/Albanians etc....

    When the German command planned to include Indian Muslim troops of the Waffen SS into the Muslim divisions, the Indian Muslims complained that they saw themselves as Indians first and they were retained in the Indian divisions.

    “Yup it looks like Russia is a fake opposition to the West today.”

    I think it’s a reasonable conclusion. Russia it the “best enemy money can buy”.

    Western MIC needs a powerful enemy. Russia is that enemy.

    Thank you for the video. I was wrong. I don’t know where I read that stuff about Bose…or maybe I never read it and it’s my memory playing tricks on me.

    You didn’t answer my two questions.

    It’s then correct to conclude that you do admire Hitler and Churchill even though you know that they despised your race ?

    Well, I suppose that is possible. We can even call it love. We don’t need to hate those who hate us, to despise those who despise us.

    But if that is true – you do admire the two war criminals and white supremacists- then one can say that you have more in common with blacks that are obsessed with their skin colour than you think.

    You suffer from alienation. In that case you should do something about it.

    You see, reading your posts (some very interesting) , I thought you were interested in facts/truth.

    And facts tell us that white civilization is a great civilization. Which, of course isn’t incompatible with fact that that civilization committed great crimes. All civilizations did.

    Slavery wouldn’t have been possible w/o participation of blacks themselves. Blacks aren’t victims.

    Children are victims. Adults that are not stupid should accept responsibility for their actions.

    And blacks (lots of them) suffer from alienation. Michael Jackson was so sick (alienation) that he became “white”. That of course didn’t have any impact on millions of blacks. They still love the guy.

    As they still love the black Don Corleone -Barack Obama -, who, as all american war criminals(former presidents) were put in power by the tribe. Blacks of course believe that was their achievement. If you are black and not stupid you would be proud of someone that burned that house and not of someone that entered it to serve the devil.

    All this to say that if it’s really exact you admire Churchill and Hitler, you also suffer from alienation as lots of black folks.

    That would be a pity. I hope I’m wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. Dagandy says:
    @Bliss

    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans.
     
    You drooling retard, modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent. What kind of an utterly clueless idiot are you to claim they had nothing in common?

    All humans in Africa and outside Africa have African human ancestors. Therefore alll races of mankind can be traced back to africans. Why is it such an exciting surprise for you to learn that Europeans are descended from humans in the Deep South of Africa? The Hofmeyr skull just confirms what genetics already revealed.

    Btw, the Hofmeyr skull predates european Cheddar man by over 25,000 years. Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot...

    https://news.nationalgeographic.com/content/dam/news/2018/02/07/cheddar-man-reconstruction/01-cheddar-man-Credit-Channel-4-Plimsol-Productions-2.adapt.1900.1.jpg

    Uhm …that cheddar man pigmentation has been proved to be fraud .

    Malla is correct,,your really low IQ.

    @malla …you’ve posted some great stuff that I’ve enjoyed since finding unz .
    Thanks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    malla …you’ve posted some great stuff that I’ve enjoyed since finding unz .
    Thanks.
     
    You are welcome buddy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. Truth says:
    @Okechukwu

    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc… more than 150000 years ago at the least.
     
    You're a scientifically illiterate buffoon. There is no "branching away" in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.

    Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures.
     
    You have no idea what they looked like. What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification. There are no "Caucasian facial structures" that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa. Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.


    Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them.
     
    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations. But, again, that doesn’t indicate discrete differentiation because those are superficial traits that are modulated by relatively few genes.

    Is the Bromance off already?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    Is the Bromance off already?
     
    The Indian neo-Nazi broke the peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Malla says:

    It’s then correct to conclude that you do admire Hitler and Churchill even though you know that they despised your race ?

    I do not admire Churchill. Indeed I dislike Churchill. Churchill alone does not represent the British Empire. As far as Hitler, my admiration depends on the system he created in the Third Reich not much on his racial beliefs. Even his beliefs and actions about Jews (where there is a lot of controversy about what really was done to the Jews, were things hyped up?) are very insignificant when I look at the Third Reich. The enemy of all mankind are the banking elites and he fought them.

    Actually many non Whites are waking up to this fact

    And blacks (lots of them) suffer from alienation.

    I am not sure about that. A single black person in a White town may feel alienated but if he is a decent friendly guy he can make White friends. I have been in similar situation, being the only Indian among groups of Arabs or Whites or East Asians or even blacks. Did not feel alienated one bit as I made friends very fast.

    Michael Jackson was so sick (alienation) that he became “white”.

    I am very doubtful if that was the real reason for his actions. Why did no other black or non White celebrity not take the same step. you must realise that many celebrities are ‘controlled’ by handlers. People like Marilyn Monroe, Elvis etc… lived horrible controlled lives. You would know this if you know how the entertainment industry works. Actually out of alienation, most celebs would be converting to Judaism.

    All this to say that if it’s really exact you admire Churchill and Hitler, you also suffer from alienation as lots of black folks.

    LOL No I do not.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss
    The Mongol Nazis look mean as hell. But not nearly as scary as the nazi Mallas of India:

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pJWkXWD7wLo/UhTtLsboSVI/AAAAAAAAAMo/tkJ90XbEucE/s1600/indian+nazi.jpg

    https://static.toiimg.com/photo/65347384.cms
    , @Anonymous
    "As far as Hitler, my admiration depends on the system he created in the Third Reich not much on his racial beliefs."

    You can't separate them -the system and his racial beliefs.

    "The enemy of all mankind are the banking elites and he fought them."

    Agree but don't forget that he was put into power by the banking elites so I'm not sure he really fought them. I'mean , no doubt he fought them rhetorically...But the banking elites are not stupid.

    Normally they don't put someone in power that they don't control. The Bolsheviks also "fought" the banking elites and we know where the money came from that allow that bunch of criminals to get into power.

    I was using "alienation" in sense of being alienated from the values of one's society, family and the racial group that one happens to be born into.

    Michael Jackson was very alienated guy because he hated his skin colour..Like lots of blacks.

    Leopold Sedar Senghor was a very alienated African intellectual and politician. He would like to have been born French.

    Alienation and stupidity explain why Africans admire Barack Obama. They can prove to the white man that they can also do it. That BO was put into power buy the tribe, doesn't matter for most of the blacks.

    I accept that you are not alienated in spite of your admiration for Hitler.

    thanks for the videos.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. “Still, apartheid South Africa sustained far more critical scrutiny for its non-violent (if unjust) resettlement policies than did the U.S. for its equally unjust but actively violent mass resettlement agenda, say, in South Vietnam.”

    Why “unjust” in South Africa’s case?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Peasant
    I guess because most people think of Aparthied as being not only morally loathsome but also completely uncessesary. Added to the fact that relocations of urban intergreted neighbourhoods took place in the 1940s with all the mythologising of those areas that continues apace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. Malla says:
    @Anon
    Gypsies may have left N India voluntarily after the Muslim conquest.

    Gypsies may have left N India voluntarily after the Muslim conquest.

    Yes, that is a very good possibility.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. Peasant says:
    @Nicholas Stix
    "Still, apartheid South Africa sustained far more critical scrutiny for its non-violent (if unjust) resettlement policies than did the U.S. for its equally unjust but actively violent mass resettlement agenda, say, in South Vietnam."

    Why "unjust" in South Africa's case?

    I guess because most people think of Aparthied as being not only morally loathsome but also completely uncessesary. Added to the fact that relocations of urban intergreted neighbourhoods took place in the 1940s with all the mythologising of those areas that continues apace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @shegetz
    Even Jews will be purged from SA, as long as they have something the blacks want.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. kuladanga says:
    @Haxo Angmark
    try as she might, the (((Issacsohn-Mercer))) will never be able to make amends for her own, her family's, and other SA Jews' predominant role in destroying White South Africa.

    Gosh, you folks have got it bad. I notice every time Ms Mercer posts, she gets trolled for being Jewish or for her politics. With the same rhetoric the neo-Maoist left uses to shut down the discourse. So either come out with some facts as to why this article should not be read, and Madame should not be allowed to post, or shut it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    I like many of Ilana's articles, but the simple fact is that her Rabbi father and she willingly played a part in what she now decries, then ran away to Israel when things blew up. In Ilana's case, going from there to the U.S.A. Don't have any idea of her father, maybe he is still in Israel, maybe the U.S.A.

    So whenever she is commenting about Sth. Africa or similar, commentors have a right (and, at least one per thread, a duty) to call her out on it.

    It is that simple.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. shegetz says:
    @Peasant
    I guess because most people think of Aparthied as being not only morally loathsome but also completely uncessesary. Added to the fact that relocations of urban intergreted neighbourhoods took place in the 1940s with all the mythologising of those areas that continues apace.

    Even Jews will be purged from SA, as long as they have something the blacks want.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. Che Guava says:
    @Malla

    Like your many comments that are annoying others here, cheers for that.
     
    Thanks bud. What is more fun is reading their frustrated responses.

    Yes, very few countries play cricket. The main cricketing countries are England, West Indies, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
    It would have been great of Japan and the USA would have played cricket too. Cricket is a great game, the complexity turns off newcomers but once you get a hang of it, you get addicted.
    However we are seeing Kenya, Afghanistan, Netherlands, Scotland etc...coming up lately and may become full fledged cricket playing countries in the future.
    A lot of Indians are becoming curious about baseball lately.

    Cricket used to be major in the U.S.A.

    In the latter half of the nineteenth century, the Spalding company invented baseball as a macho version of rounders. It was all intended just to sell stuff, from the start. Spalding equipment.

    They had much press cooperation in pushing their advertising line that baseball represented American manly virtues, and that cricket was for sissies. That was their line, and it is easy to confirm.

    To me, it is quite the opposite, although Spalding clearly won their marketing campaign there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla

    Cricket used to be major in the U.S.A.
     
    Yes I know there used to be major cricket matches in between England and USA.

    the Spalding company invented baseball as a macho version of rounders.
     
    Wow crazy. How businesses can change culture of nations. Reminds me of De Beers, whose advertising campaign made diamond engagement rings a "tradition" in the USA and Japan.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Che Guava says:
    @kuladanga
    Gosh, you folks have got it bad. I notice every time Ms Mercer posts, she gets trolled for being Jewish or for her politics. With the same rhetoric the neo-Maoist left uses to shut down the discourse. So either come out with some facts as to why this article should not be read, and Madame should not be allowed to post, or shut it.

    I like many of Ilana’s articles, but the simple fact is that her Rabbi father and she willingly played a part in what she now decries, then ran away to Israel when things blew up. In Ilana’s case, going from there to the U.S.A. Don’t have any idea of her father, maybe he is still in Israel, maybe the U.S.A.

    So whenever she is commenting about Sth. Africa or similar, commentors have a right (and, at least one per thread, a duty) to call her out on it.

    It is that simple.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. Malla says:
    @Dagandy
    Uhm ...that cheddar man pigmentation has been proved to be fraud .

    Malla is correct,,your really low IQ.

    @malla ...you've posted some great stuff that I've enjoyed since finding unz .
    Thanks.

    malla …you’ve posted some great stuff that I’ve enjoyed since finding unz .
    Thanks.

    You are welcome buddy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. Malla says:
    @Che Guava
    Cricket used to be major in the U.S.A.

    In the latter half of the nineteenth century, the Spalding company invented baseball as a macho version of rounders. It was all intended just to sell stuff, from the start. Spalding equipment.

    They had much press cooperation in pushing their advertising line that baseball represented American manly virtues, and that cricket was for sissies. That was their line, and it is easy to confirm.

    To me, it is quite the opposite, although Spalding clearly won their marketing campaign there.

    Cricket used to be major in the U.S.A.

    Yes I know there used to be major cricket matches in between England and USA.

    the Spalding company invented baseball as a macho version of rounders.

    Wow crazy. How businesses can change culture of nations. Reminds me of De Beers, whose advertising campaign made diamond engagement rings a “tradition” in the USA and Japan.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. @anonymous
    "And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead."

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.

    " He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. "

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler - , everyone knows that Russia isn't an independent country and that Russia is controlled by the same force that controls USA, GB, France etc...Putin best friend is the the king of Israel.
    Maybe in the 30's it was the same. Except that the mafia state didn't exist at the time

    " Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire".

    Later in life ? Can you give a date ?

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.

    Why ? Again , because Hitler had great admiration for the British empire and because like his "friend" - the great war criminal Churchill - he believed that Indians were inferiors and they needed a white master.

    Your admiration for the man is really bizarre...Because I don't think you believe that you belong to an inferior race. Do you ?

    Do you also admire that great war criminal and the greatest English hero of all time - Sir Winston Churchill , and who despised Indians ?

    "But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich."

    No doubt about that...But that isn't reason for you or anyone else to consider the guy as a kind of hero because he tried to save the white race or he fought for the white race.

    As usual, follow the money. If you follow the money, you will understand that Hitler /Nazi Party had a master.

    In spite of Hollywood movies, there was no doubt that Germany was condemned to lose that war.

    The enemy was inside Germany and some high ranking Nazis were working for Germany's defeat.

    ” Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.” ”

    Winter began early, by negligence, or intentionally, opinions differ, the German Wehrmacht was not equipped for winter.
    As an example, ‘shitting at minus forty ° Celcius is a life threatening excercise’, the shit freezes inside your body.
    The Luftwaffe did have winter clothing;
    But it was not just shitting and shelter, weapons froze, engines could not be started, and so on and so forth.
    Intentionally no winter clothing, the suspicion is that the responsible general did not want Hitler to win.

    But Moscow was strategically unimportant, as was Stalingrad.
    The Caucasus oil was important.
    I never understood this, until I found out that Japan had promised to attack the USSR if Hitler had taken Moscow and stood at the Wolga.
    In both cases Hitler failed.
    IF Japan would have attacked, I do not think so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Malla
    Thanks for the info.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    There is no “branching away” in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.
     
    My God, you are a low IQ monkey of What?

    Watch the video again, you fool

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjpIqzGrFR8

    There is a branching away you stupid fool. The Negroid races it seems is a very recent creation and the Caucasoid race is much much older than the Negroid.


    What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.
     
    The stupidity of this fool can make one cry. We know their skull structures. You have a Negroid skull structure that looks very different from a person with Caucasoid skull structure. they LOOKED NOTHING like you because, people who looked like you did not even exist for at least more 72,000 years after the Caucasoids left Africa fro Eureasia. These people who left Africa and then came back again had nothing to do with Negroids. Watch the video again, there were many races in Africa and many have become extinct. We have lost a lot of diversity. There were many parallel races living in Africa and your ancestors who did not yet look like you were living parallel with the Caucasians. Your ancestors inbred with some primitive humanoids some 150,000 years ago but these genes are not found in Eurasians.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification
     
    Yes that is true. It is a language group but it is sometimes used racially w.r.t Khoi San and the Pgymies. Bantus are taller than pygmies, in that sense.

    There are no “Caucasian facial structures” that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa.
     
    Of course there is a Caucasian skull structure which is very different from your skull structure. Ask any forensic department guy in your police department and he will tell you there is. The difference in between Europeans and Africans is NOT ONLY Skin colour. If that is what you idiots believe, you are failures in science.

    Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.
     
    Nope. Only blacks have descended from black people. Blacks have higher genetic variability because your ancestors have bred with more primitive humans living in Africa and Europeans or Asians do not have those genes in them. You do not have the genes to create White people.

    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations.
     
    No dummy, watch the video again. White skin is not the only difference in between black negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Skeletal structures are very different as well.

    My God, you are a low IQ monkey of What?

    A hairy Indian has no business calling a black person a monkey. Many of you are damn near as hairy as monkeys. That’s physical evidences of your closeness to monkeys and our distance from them.

    Watch the video again, you fool

    Great. Your source is a homemade YouTube video from a broken-English spewing white supremacist goon from some Eastern European goat-herding village. Just when I think you couldn’t be any dumber, you exceed my expectations.

    There is a branching away you stupid fool. The Negroid races it seems is a very recent creation and the Caucasoid race is much much older than the Negroid.

    Caucasoids are part of the Negroid race, you unscientific asswipe. They are a mere sampling of black African diversity that through tiny tweaks in DNA developed the features commonly associated with Caucasians today. For example, the mutation that’s responsible for the light skin of Europeans is a single tweak about 8000 years ago in a gene known as SLC24A5. Guess where this gene originated. Well, sub-Saharan Africans also carry this gene except they have a G where Europeans have an A. This one tiny substitution (from G to A) is responsible for white skin.

    The stupidity of this fool can make one cry. We know their skull structures. You have a Negroid skull structure that looks very different from a person with Caucasoid skull structure.

    That may be true. But my skull structure is also distinct from many other sub-Saharan African phenotypes, which themselves are convergent with Caucasian phenotypes. As such, there is no such thing as a Negroid skull.

    Of course there is a Caucasian skull structure which is very different from your skull structure. Ask any forensic department guy in your police department and he will tell you there is.

    Forensic anthropologists CANNOT divine race from skulls or bones, dummy. Forensic anthropologists in law enforcement can make an inference based on the circumstantial evidence in the vicinity of the specimen. Otherwise it’s little more than random assignment. So tell me, if we have a skeleton from a person who was 1/4 Nigerian, 1/4 Norwegian, 1/4 Japanese and 1/4 Moroccan, to which race do you assign his bones?

    Nope. Only blacks have descended from black people. Blacks have higher genetic variability because your ancestors have bred with more primitive humans living in Africa and Europeans or Asians do not have those genes in them. You do not have the genes to create White people.

    Haha. You gotta love Stormfront “science.” Man, you are one stupid and delusional motherfucker.

    Here’s the thing, my dimwitted hindu friend, Africans have greater genetic diversity because the Out of Africa migrants were just a small subset of the population, taking with them just a fraction of the continent’s genetic diversity. It’s pretty simple to figure out, unless you’re an idiot.

    No dummy, watch the video again. White skin is not the only difference in between black negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Skeletal structures are very different as well.

    Yeah, you and the uploader of the video would be laughed out of any scientific conference you were crazy enough to present your “research” at. Stick to the pseudocientific community on YouTube and the dark web. Do not, and I repeat, do not ever try to circulate this junk in the real world. You are literally spouting Mortonian phrenology that was utterly and thoroughly debunked in the 19th century.

    Read More
    • Agree: Bliss
    • Replies: @Malla

    Great. Your source is a homemade YouTube video from a broken-English spewing white supremacist goon from some Eastern European goat-herding village. Just when I think you couldn’t be any dumber, you exceed my expectations.
     
    Home made video? The video cites scientific papers.

    Caucasoids are part of the Negroid race,
     
    LOL. No they are not you dumb fool. Just because you have that gene does not mean the Caucasian race is part of the Negroid race. Skin colour is not the only difference in between Negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Albino Negroids do not look anything like Europeans.

    sub-Saharan African phenotypes, which themselves are convergent with Caucasian phenotypes. As such, there is no such thing as a Negroid skull. Forensic anthropologists CANNOT divine race from skulls or bones, dummy.

     

    So barks a low IQ monkey
    https://jenjdanna.com/blog/2012/7/10/forensics-101-race-determination-based-on-the-skull.html
    https://www.slideshare.net/drchetansamra/identification-of-race-forensic-medicine
    identification of Race- forensic medicine
    https://jenjdanna.com/blog/2012/7/10/forensics-101-race-determination-based-on-the-skull.html
    Forensics 101: Race Determination Based on the Skull
    https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1137&context=totem

    http://www.ijofo.org/article.asp?issn=2542-5013;year=2017;volume=2;issue=1;spage=38;epage=42;aulast=Rawlani
    Racial characteristics of human teeth
    The determination of sex and ancestry can be accessed from shape and form of the skull, especially from skull appearance. Forensic dentists can determine race within the three major groups: Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid. Additional characteristics of teeth, such as cusps of Carabelli, shovel-shaped incisors, and multicusped premolars, can also assist in the determination of ancestry.
    https://www.jpsr.pharmainfo.in/Documents/Volumes/Vol6Issue11/jpsr06111407.pdf
    Racial Variations in Different Skulls

    http://www.delmarlearning.com/companions/content/0766806251/apps/grafolc_d.asp
    Forensic Anthropology: The Purpose and Value of Facial Restoration in Human Skeletal Identification

    Haha. You gotta love Stormfront “science.” Man, you are one stupid and delusional motherfucker.
     
    What Stormfront Storm front are you guys barking about?

    Africans have greater genetic diversity because the Out of Africa migrants were just a small subset of the population
     
    Listen dumbo. The OOA population were not a subset of the ancestors of Negroids. Negroids have higher diversity because of interbreeding with primitive archaic humanoids.

    Yeah, you and the uploader of the video would be laughed out of any scientific conference you were crazy enough to present your “research” at. Stick to the pseudocientific community on YouTube and the dark web. D
     
    Stop your gibber gabbering. The video cites some latest scientific research.
    , @Marc43

    A hairy Indian has no business calling a black person a monkey. Many of you are damn near as hairy as monkeys. That’s physical evidences of your closeness to monkeys and our distance from them
     
    " Monkey" refers to the percentage and type of hominid admixture. Blacks have a greater percentage of hominid admixture, of more varied and archaic types (Erectus, Habilis, etc), than other groups, which is why you are called "monkey". That appellation was merely an old social convention of identifying and labeling the physical traits (black skin, African hair, hybrid archaic skull shapes, hormone and the resultant lean mass differences in the young, bone density differences, sexual behavior, social behavior, tool use and technology, etc.) associated with this archaic admixture.

    There is no "physical evidence" of Blacks being distant from those archaic hominids. The Black race exists solely due to Cro Magnid (the only modern unmixed human) mixing with archaic hominids. If you are of the African Race, generally speaking, then your genetic code contains a significant portion of archaic hominid admixture.


    Caucasoids are part of the Negroid race, you unscientific asswipe
     
    They aren't. See above. We can make you via intermixing (as we did with archaic hominids), you can't make us.

    Albino Africans do not look like White people of any type. Albinos still have all of the physical characteristics (mostly remnants of archaic hominid phenotype / body + neural architecture) of Black Africans.

    The out of Africa theory is a lie, which is implied by the relatively recent printed science peer reviewed anthropology journals. In other words, the theory is disproven, according to the printed science, but no one is stating it in the press and pop science magazines for political reasons. What you should be asking yourself is why aren't they walking the theory back, in spite of it being disproven with the genetic science? Institutionalized conspiracies are never good for minorities.


    That may be true. But my skull structure is also distinct from many other sub-Saharan African phenotypes, which themselves are convergent with Caucasian phenotypes. As such, there is no such thing as a Negroid skull.
     
    Your naXalt argument for millions of negroid skulls with consistent negroid skull architecture is not an argument.

    Sub-Saharan Africans have the widest genetic variability on the planet, because they are the only "race" that was formed by Cro Magnid intermixing with the exceptionally wide variety of hominids still lurking in the African plains and forests at the time.

    It follows that another way of stating that SS Africans have unqiue skull shapes from one another is to say that African skull shape can vary (away from the Cro Magnid skull and each other) due to hominid admixture type and percentage.

    However, that is not an argument that there is no Negroid skull shape. That's only an argument that there can be variety in the negroid skull shape, and due to hybridization, and that none match the Cro Magnid Skull shape unless the negroid genetics have been long bred out. Due to genetic variety in Africa that sometimes can realize genetic isolation, it is also conceivable that there is less archaic hominid admixture for some tribes as compared to others. This will also lead to skull shape variability, but in no way implies Caucasoid evolution from those tribes. The gene flow was in the opposite direction.


    Here’s the thing, my dimwitted hindu friend, Africans have greater genetic diversity because the Out of Africa migrants were just a small subset of the population, taking with them just a fraction of the continent’s genetic diversity. It’s pretty simple to figure out, unless you’re an idiot.
     
    No, the genetic diversity in Africa is due to hybridization with archaic hominids. Within the (very) broad category of the "White race", our variability mostly comes from the relative percentage of both Caucasian Neanderthal (most of us) and Asian Neanderthal / Denisovan (Turks, possibly Hungarians, probably slavs) for those "races" who were bred out by Mongol invasions and other Mongol contact.

    That's the truth of the matter. Whites have an instinctual aversion to Black populations as a genetic impulse to avoid interbreeding with populations that carry archaic hominid genetic loads. Nothing is going to change that. Like it or not.

    , @Malla

    A hairy Indian has no business calling a black person a monkey. Many of you are damn near as hairy as monkeys. That’s physical evidences of your closeness to monkeys and our distance from them.
     
    I am sorry I used that 'monkey' term. I take it back. I got a bit carried away. Sorry.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. Patricus says:
    @Bragadocious
    I don't know why Ilana brings up American dirty laundry. They weren't the ones killing Boers; the Brits were. And when the Brits could no longer kill the Boers they demonized them to the point where it was considered acceptable for black South Africans to kill them. And now Theresa May has endorsed land confiscation "as long as it's legal." So nothing's changed for Britain.

    The North American oppression of indigenous peoples was nothing like the South African domination of the blacks. Our predecessors died overwhelmingly from diseases like small pox. They were not a passive peoples like Africans. Native people could be among the most cruel and barbaric people known in history.

    Not to gloat over the current fate of the Boers. If anything they have a greater claim to that country than the Negroes. They predated almost all of them. In the next decades South Africa will decline to a sad state. Maybe the Chinese can enslave them or starve them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    The North American oppression of indigenous peoples was nothing like the South African domination of the blacks. Our predecessors died overwhelmingly from diseases like small pox. They were not a passive peoples like Africans. Native people could be among the most cruel and barbaric people known in history.
     
    LOL. Africans defeated European armies in many encounters and battles. Your Native American ancestors largely laid down and allowed themselves to be vanquished and thoroughly conquered. Many of you were even dumb enough to think the Europeans were gods. Africans had no such illusions.

    Unlike in the Americas, European manifest destiny failed in Africa due to African military resistance. There were powerful empires in Africa that were actually stronger than the Europeans. It wasn't until these empires declined coupled with the introduction of modern weapons that Europeans were able to make any headway there. But, thankfully, since Europeans started in Africa so late, their hold was tenuous and they were easier to kick out. Try kicking them out of your territories in the Americas.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. Okechukwu says:
    @Bombercommand
    Wrong. The major consumers of interracial porn are black guys. And what a surprise, the porn is all black guys with white women. I wonder what black women think of the brothers all too obvious fetish? It is understandable that black guys consume huge amounts of interracial porn, because the chance of a black guy getting a white girl is close to zero. Okechukwu, you don't want to hear what white girls say about black guys.

    Wrong. The major consumers of interracial porn are black guys.

    The depth of your self-delusion is stunning. But, hey, whatever helps you sleep at night.

    I wonder what black women think of the brothers all too obvious fetish?

    White girls have chased after me since grade school. I wonder who really has the fetish.

    Okechukwu, you don’t want to hear what white girls say about black guys.

    Maybe I’ll ask my white wife, who is a PhD but looks like a supermodel. And then I’ll query all the white girls and women I’ve dated and fucked over the years and even their parents who also loved me. What do you think? Shall I?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bombercommand
    Okechukwu, no "white girls have chased after you since grade school" and you don't have a white wife that looks like a supermodel and you haven't "dated and fucked" any white girls and women. Your story is as false as the gibberish about an alleged "black ancient Egypt". Do you think that falsely suggesting that white girls have a fetish for black guys is going to make me do anything but laugh? Since you brought up the subject, I searched my memory for any black guy/white girl couples I have seen and since 1995 the number is(drumroll) THREE, that's certainly impressive evidence of a white girl fetish for black guys. I'm a white man and I've heard what the white(and asian) girls say about black guys and you don't want to hear it, but maybe you should. You are simply a victim of the absurd black supremicist propaganda that the media craps out like a sewer(e.g. Beethoven was black/black ancient Egypt and the current media craze of commercials featuring a black guy with a white girl). And Okechukwu, your murky response to my entirely true assertion that black guys consume massive amounts of interracial porn tells me you know exactly what I'm talking about.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments