The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Apartheid In Black and White: Truth About the Afrikaner (1)
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_279507872

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In a recent translation of Tacitus’ Annals, a question was raised as to whether “there were any ‘nations’ in antiquity other than the Jews.” Upon reflection, one suspects that the same question can be posed about the Afrikaners in the modern era.

In fact, in April of 2009, former South African President Jacob Zuma infuriated the “multicultural noise machine” the world over by stating: “Of all the white groups that are in South Africa, it is only the Afrikaners that are truly South Africans in the true sense of the word. Up to this day, they [the Afrikaners] don’t carry two passports, they carry one. They are here to stay.”

Indeed, the Afrikaners fought Africa’s first anticolonial struggles, are native to the land and not colonists in any normal sense. Yet the liberal world order has only ever singled out Afrikaners for having established apartheid, considered by the Anglo-American-European axis of interventionism to be “one of the world’s most retrogressive colonial systems.”

However, while the honing of apartheid by the Afrikaner National Party started in 1948, after Daniel Malan assumed the prime minister’s post, elements of the program were part of the policy first established in 1923 by the British-controlled government.

There was certainly nothing Mosaic about the maze of racial laws that formed the edifice of apartheid. The Population Registration Act required that all South Africans be classified by bureaucrats in accordance with race. The Group Areas Act “guaranteed absolute residential segregation.” Pass laws regulated the comings-and-goings of blacks (though not them alone), and ensured that black workers left white residential areas by nightfall.

Easily the most egregious aspect of flushing blacks out of white areas was the manner in which entire communities were uprooted and dumped in bleak, remote, officially designated settlement sites— “vast rural slums with urban population densities, but no urban amenities beyond the buses that represented their slender lifelines to the cities.”

Still, apartheid South Africa sustained far more critical scrutiny for its non-violent (if unjust) resettlement policies than did the U.S. for its equally unjust but actively violent mass resettlement agenda, say, in South Vietnam. (See Sophie Quinn-Judge, “Lawless Zones,” The Times Literary Supplement, February 26, 2010.)

Or, before that. In his magisterial “History of the American People,” historian Paul Johnson, a leading protagonist for America, details the rather energetic destruction and displacement by Andrew Jackson of the “the oldest American nations,” the Indians.

Nor should we forget subsequent American military misdeeds. There was, for instance, the 1890 “Wounded Knee” bloodbath in South Dakota (where a U.S. cavalry regiment wiped out, within an hour, between 150 and 300 Native Americans, women and children included). A decade later occurred the war in the Philippines, where a million Filipinos perished at American hands. The 1990 book “In Our Image,” written by historian Stanley Kurnow, reports that at least 200,000 of the dead Filipinos in that war were civilians. Many of the civilians breathed their last in disease-ridden concentration camps which were known as reconcentrados.

ORDER IT NOW

It was the British, not the settler ancestors of the contemporary Afrikaners, who vanquished the locals with the express purpose of producing British-type “free” societies. The horrors of British concentration camps during the Boer War are well documented. And there is little to be said in extenuation of Britain’s Zulu Wars, which were summarized in an extract from the once-famous 1930 historiographical parody “1066 And All That”: “War Against Zulus. Cause: the Zulus. Zulus exterminated. Peace with Zulus.”

Why so many conservatives still defend Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt is a mystery. The fact is that between 1942 and 1945, the FDR administration dispensed with habeas corpus in order to relocate en masse, and confine in camps, some 112,000 Japanese aliens and American-born citizens of Japanese ancestry. These Japanese internees were penned in camps, their bank accounts frozen often for years, without being charged with any crime.

Nothing in Afrikaner rule, even at its least enlightened, can match such episodes in American history.

The offending National Party began to dismantle apartheid almost a decade before the transition to democracy. By 1986, the party had already brought down apartheid’s pillars. “Beginning in the early 1980s, the South African government expanded democracy by drawing colored people and Indians into Parliament.” By the end of the 1980s, the pernicious influx control laws had been scrapped, public facilities desegregated, and racial sex laws repealed. “Blacks were allowed full freehold rights to property” and admission to historically white universities.

Next week: “Apartheid: A Strategy for Survival”

Citations are in “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons For America From Post-Apartheid South-Africa” (2011) by ilana mercer, who has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian column since 1999. She’s on Twitter, Facebook,Gab& YouTube

 
• Category: Foreign Policy, History • Tags: Afrikaner, South Africa 
Hide 305 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I don’t know why Ilana brings up American dirty laundry. They weren’t the ones killing Boers; the Brits were. And when the Brits could no longer kill the Boers they demonized them to the point where it was considered acceptable for black South Africans to kill them. And now Theresa May has endorsed land confiscation “as long as it’s legal.” So nothing’s changed for Britain.

  2. try as she might, the (((Issacsohn-Mercer))) will never be able to make amends for her own, her family’s, and other SA Jews’ predominant role in destroying White South Africa.

  3. @Bragadocious

    Did you see the recent clip of May “dancing” with black school children in SA? It’s a pretty damning statement on how low the British political class has sunk that this loathsome bitch attained a prominent position. (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

  4. llloyd says: • Website

    I hear the whine. What’s South African history to do with America? Presumably, the Japanese Americans got their bank accounts unfrozen after the war. An improvement on the treatment of the Palestinians’ frozen bank accounts by Israel after 1948. They went into the Israel treasury by Israel law. But I suppose that is anti-Semitic to bring that up.

  5. Anonymous[132] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bragadocious

    Only a Jewess could twist news from South Africa into a two-minute hate against America.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  6. Watching says:

    Anyone usurping the land and rights of another people, is a criminal interloper. Putting them under a microscope and attempting to delineate subtle differences is a waste of time and adds to the crimes.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Fran800
  7. @Beefcake the Mighty

    (I would say Hitler is laughing from the grave, except that he was an admirer of the British Empire.)

    Pummeling people with V2 rockets, glide bombs, and gravity bombs seems an exceptionally peculiar way to show admiration.

    Sorry for the OT, but that struck me as comical.

  8. I wonder what truth is being revealed.
    The Boers, mainly of Dutch and German origin, drove the original peoples from their lands, in wars.
    These wars were extremely one sided, repeater rifles against javelins etc.
    How many casualties among the javelin people, never saw any estimate.
    With the end of racism, and democracy, the Boers etc became a minority.
    A relative of mine lived in S Africa from 1955 until 1985, then the first bombs exploded, and, as he had the Dutch pension age, 65, he and his wife left for the Netherlands, though he loved S Africa.
    He died not so long ago, visited S Africa until high age, and told me about deteriorating conditions, the country in general, but especially how whites were treated.
    He said ‘they all (whites) want to leave, but most of them cannot’, financially.
    There can be long discussions about the moral side of the conflict between black and white, who owns the land, etc., what happens is clear to me: a rich country going the Zimbabwe way.
    I never saw my relative as a racist, yet he was of the opinion that ‘the blacks are completely useless’.
    In my opinion just a statement of fact.

  9. @Beefcake the Mighty

    As Home Secretary prior to rising to PM, Mrs. May had access to the vast data gathered by the UK’s intelligence apparatus as well as much shared among Five Eyes members. There is little doubt that, like in the US government, most of the major politicians in the UK are hopelessly compromised and therefore beholden to she or he who holds the data. What drives the Deep State insane about Trump is that he is difficult to blackmail because at some point he just says “eff it,” which means they are probably running him by more overt threats.

    To Bragadocious’ question about dredging up the US history, we assumed the mantle of Leader of the Free world (more like Leader of the Fee World, if you ask me), and became instrumental in regime change in South Africa. The US is fair game, especially when you see it’s former African American President standing in SA and giving a virtual stamp of approval to its new racist policies.

    What is happening to the Boers in SA is an atrocity by any reasonable measure, but it is winked at by the Western Establishment because they too are engaged in a war on a certain class of people who won’t go quietly into the dark night.

    • Replies: @Realist
  10. shegetz says:

    With the tribal blacks of SA, it was always a matter of might is right. Now they have the power, they will be relentless.

    While the author was, to my limited knowledge anyway, a vocal advocate for the end of Apartheid, she has left the outcome and afaik is now in Israel, where the government will back you as a Jew, far more than it seems gentile whites get in the West nowadays in diversitopia.

    We know what is coming down the pipeline when we are reduced to minority in our lands, as it stands a Jewishly led and coordinated situation and one Jews in Israel would never countenance for themselves in their homeland as they know their own survival is at stake. They’d be made short work of by their enemies on all sides.

    So why are so many Jews openly engineering white minority in Anglophone countries and Western Europe? As the outcome is very probably a highly hostile situation for gentile whites to live in, given all the Jewishly led laws about racism that are lenient on minority racism against whites in the form of rape and brutality, but bring the sword of Damocles upon any white that opens their mouth against mass immigration/reduction to minority, it can only be interpreted the way it is, veiled hostility for gentile whites.

    Galling for Anglophones, we sacrificed, fought, killed and likewise perished in global conflagration not that long ago. What was it all for when the Jewish elite sell us out like this today?

    Sadly, unlike the author, living as I understand in a heavily armed society, with compulsory military service, a culture fostering excellence, nuclear options as insurance, even (unbelievably) generous USA taxpayer subsides, there is virtually nowhere for white gentiles to go. Otherwise we fight or perish.

    My heart goes out to the Afrikaner. Indeed, so did my wallet, but I suspected the charity operator used some of the funds for a personal holiday, so once bitten as they say.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @Joe Wong
  11. So what was Zuma saying about those holding a passport in addition to the South African one… he was signalling out Jews as being the interloper group!

  12. @shegetz

    Destroying the most capable group in the world may be the objective, out of revenge, and/or in an effort to control the world.
    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    Weird people, jews.
    The German Sarrazin, former member of the Board of the Bundesbank, the German Fed, outstanding economist, former senator of Berlin, in 2010 wrote a book on how immigration destroys Germany, by importing stupidity.
    Merkel fired him immediately.
    His next book was about the euro disaster.
    Now a book by him on the dangers of Islam has appeared.
    A Dutch jewish journalist, Joshua Livestro, writes that the book should be forbidden.

    Unable to understand writings like this, do not people like this Joshua see that Muslims are not friends of jews ?
    Or is it that the nationalism of men like Sarrazin is seen as the greater evil for jews ?

    https://tpo.nl/2018/08/30/dit-nieuwe-boek-van-thilo-sarrazin-moet-volgens-joshua-livestro-worden-verboden/

    • Replies: @shegetz
    , @Malla
    , @Erebus
    , @Respect
  13. Malla says:

    Interesting piece about Rhodesia

    From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe
    By: Anthony C. LoBaido

    [MORE]

    At the inaugural ceremony, Prime Minister Mugabe’s call for reconciliation between blacks and whites came as a welcome surprise to those who had for years dismissed him as “a Marxist-terrorist trying to gain power through the barrel of a gun.” … The unexpected size of his majority gave Mugabe an unequivocal mandate…. All in all, the election and handover represented a triumph of democracy in the face of considerable external pressure.
    — Andrew Young
    President Carter’s Ambassador to the United Nations
    The excerpted statement above by Andrew Young provides a small sampling of the outrageous commentary on Robert Mugabe’s ascension to power in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) in an essay penned by Young for Foreign Affairs’ special report, “America and the World, 1980.” As President Jimmy Carter’s emissary to Africa, Young played a pivotal role — along with Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, and other Carter administration officials — in enthroning Mugabe’s terror regime and turning much of the Dark Continent into the nightmarish slaughterhouse of chaos and terror it has become.
    Two years earlier, in 1978, Ambassador Andrew Young described Robert Mugabe in an interview with the Times of London. “Does Mr. Mugabe strike you as a violent man?” the Times reporter asked. “Not at all, he’s a very gentle man,” Young replied. “In fact, one of the ironies of the whole struggle is that I can’t imagine Joshua Nkomo, or Robert Mugabe, ever pulling the trigger on a gun to kill anyone. I doubt that they ever have.”
    Ambassador Young could barely contain his brimming admiration for the newest “liberator” of Africa’s oppressed: “I find that I am fascinated by his intelligence, by his dedication. The only thing that frustrates me about Robert Mugabe is that he is so damned incorruptible.”
    Andrew Young knew better. During the 1970s, as Mugabe competed with his sometime ally and former mentor Joshua Nkomo for primacy in the “liberation” movement in Rhodesia, he proudly identified himself as a Maoist and proved himself one of the most ruthless terrorist leaders. His Chinese-sponsored ZANU-PF guerrillas, operating out of the neighboring communist regimes in Mozambique, Zambia, and Angola, terrorized black villages, and tortured and killed opponents.
    This was all well known not only to Andrew Young but to other pillars in the American foreign policy establishment who were promoting Mugabe as the “gentle,” “incorruptible” savior of Rhodesia. Foreign Affairs, from whence came Mr. Young’s quote at the beginning of this article, is, of course, the house journal of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), arguably the most influential “brain trust” in the world. The council, of which Young was a prominent member, had promoted Mugabe in its literature and had hosted him as an honored speaker during his long terror campaign to take control of Rhodesia. David Rockefeller, chairman of the CFR during that period, called Mugabe a “very reasonable and charming person.” Likewise, the New York Times, Washington Post, and virtually all the rest of the major print and broadcast media choir had persistently sung his praises, ignoring his well-documented record of atrocities against civilian men, women, and children — black and white.

    But in the past few years, Mugabe’s erstwhile supporters have been forced to acknowledge that he is the brutal communist dictator that his critics had exposed him as more than 30 years ago. He has bathed Zimbabwe in blood, turned it into a police state, and ruined what was previously one of the most prosperous economies in Africa. Finally, the former darling of the Liberal Establishment has been repudiated by virtually all except Communist China and his fellow African Marxist despots.
    A Beacon Extinguished
    How could Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, a thriving, vibrant, multi-cultural example of Western-style civilization, once a shining beacon for Africa, have turned into hell on Earth?
    Rhodesia’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) from Great Britain came in 1965, only a few short decades after England’s 1923 annexation of Southern Rhodesia from the South Africa Company. Under the UDI, Rhodesia pulled away from the Mother Crown rather than negotiate with Mugabe’s terrorists, as it was being pressured to do by White Hall and the powerbrokers in London. Rhodesians were all too familiar with the chaos and tyranny that had befallen neighboring countries that had capitulated to such pressure. Rhodesian leader Ian Smith, a fighter pilot who was shot down over Italy during World War II while fighting for the Allies, stood up to the Maoist, Marxist, and Communist penetration in the region all by himself. This while the rest of the Western world, wounded from Vietnam and menaced by the old Soviet Union, sat idly by — or worse yet, helped the communist-backed terrorists.
    Smith traveled to Washington, D.C., to ask for help. He wasn’t asking for foreign aid; he merely hoped to persuade President Carter to call off the economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure being applied by the U.S. State Department, the UN, and Britain in an attempt to force Rhodesia to accept rule by the Mugabe/Nkomo terrorist forces. Carter flatly refused to see Smith.
    Henry Kissinger, meanwhile, did meet with Smith in Geneva. But if Smith thought that he would receive kinder treatment from the former secretary of state and adviser to Republican presidents, he was in for a rude awakening. Precisely what threats or pressures were brought against him is not known, but Smith, who had previously pledged not to surrender to the terrorists “in ten thousand years,” was a changed man after the meeting. He is said to have aged 10 years in that one week in Geneva. It has been suggested by African observers that Smith was threatened with a military invasion of Rhodesia backed by the UN, the United States, and the U.K.
    That is entirely plausible, as such talk was in the air and detailed plans for a military invasion of South Africa had been drawn up and published by policy wonks at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace.
    Smith asked Kissinger about things like history, culture, civilization, and loyalty. After all, Rhodesia had fought for the West in the great battles of the 20th century, including World War II and the Korean War. Kissinger firmly told Smith something truly sad and even frightening, “I am afraid those things have no place in the modern world.”
    Kissinger added that “white regimes would not survive in Southern Africa.” Ironically, it is a fact that at that time the black peoples of Southern Africa were voting with their feet and fleeing from the communist-Marxist regimes run by black revolutionary clients of Washington, Moscow, and Beijing to the “white regimes” of Rhodesia and South Africa. The New World Order and seeds of today’s African mayhem were being firmly planted by the globalists at the Council on Foreign Relations and Britain’s Royal Institute for International Affairs.
    Under intense pressure from the Washington-Moscow-Beijing axis, South Africa, which had long fought for Rhodesia, cut off aid to Ian Smith’s government, hoping their own apartheid system would be spared by the West for doing so. The sellout was on. Many Rhodesians, including legendary soldiers like Willem Ratte, Bert Sachse, and Luther Eeben Barlow, who would become the backbone of South Africa’s elite special forces in the war in Angola against Cuba and the Soviet Union, fled to South Africa. The power vacuum created by that exodus would be filled by some of the most blood-thirsty savages Africa has ever seen.
    Mugabe’s Long Record
    Contrary to Andrew Young’s claims, Mugabe’s record proves that he was (and is) indeed “a Marxist-terrorist trying to gain power through the barrel of a gun.” And, contrary to popular misconceptions caused by decades of media disinformation, it was not Mugabe’s thugs who ended white rule in Rhodesia. Ian Smith and the legitimate black leaders of Rhodesia accomplished that in 1979 in multi-racial elections that brought a black majority government to power under a former Nkomo/Mugabe comrade, Bishop Abel Muzorewa, who had renounced violence to work for peaceful change.
    Mugabe and Nkomo tried to stop the elections with threats, intimidation, and terror. Mugabe issued a “death list” of the black leaders who were cooperating for a peaceful transition to black rule, calling them “traitors,” “opportunistic running-dogs,” and “capitalist vultures.” Nevertheless, 64 percent of Rhodesia’s black population defied the threats and turned out to vote. And an overwhelming two-thirds of them voted for Abel Muzorewa, making him Rhodesia/Zimbabwe’s first black prime minister.
    They were very much aware of the disasters brought about by communist-backed black dictatorships in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Mozambique, Zambia, Ghana, and Namibia. They did not want “one man, one vote, one time,” which had become the rule in Africa.
    The 1979 election that elected Muzorewa and a new black majority parliament had met all the conditions demanded by the United States and Britain and was certified to be free and fair by outside observers. But the U.S. and British governments then reneged and demanded new elections that not only included Mugabe and Nkomo, but allowed their ZANU-PF (Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front) and ZAPU (Zimbabwe African People’s Union) guerrillas back into the country as well. Believing it had no choice, Rhodesia capitulated to these outrageous demands. Following a campaign of intimidation and terror, Mugabe was “elected” in 1980, proving the African dictum that the man with the most guns and the most ruthless thugs wins.
    As anti-communists had predicted, soon after coming to power Mugabe turned on his former terrorist comrade, Joshua Nkomo, who was of the minority Matabele tribe. To accomplish this, Mugabe brought in several hundred advisers from communist North Korea to train his infamous Fifth Brigade. Then he began his great Matabele Massacre. Mugabe’s Mashona tribe (or “Shona” for short) had been long-standing rivals of the Matabele, but the two tribal groups had managed to coexist peacefully in white-ruled Rhodesia. Mugabe called his ethnic cleansing operation against Nkomo and the Matabele Gukurahundi, the Shona term for “the first rain that washes away the chaff of the last harvest before the advent of spring rains proper.”
    Bitter Harvest
    Official figures vary, but it can be roughly estimated that around 30,000 Matabele were slaughtered in Mugabe’s “liberation” of Rhodesia/Zimbabwe.
    It was an ominous prelude to what would become a fascist, archetype Maoist revolution in Rhodesia, a country roughly the size of Montana. Mugabe, with the help of his own de facto Hitler Nazi Youth corps called the “Green Bombers,” would go on to slaughter Zimbabwe’s white farmers, take away their land, and plunge the nation into a hell hole of debt, hunger, hyperinflation, murder, HIV/Aids, and hopelessness.

  14. Malla says:

    Black Population in South Africa Has Increased by 920% in 100 Years

    TNO STAFF — MAY 30, 2013

    The black population in South Africa has increased by an astonishing 920 percent in just 100 years, mainly thanks to white farmers and western infrastructure, a new report from the Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU) has revealed.

    The report, titled “Whose Land is it Anyway,” was brought out to counter the build-up to the centenary of the 1913 Land Act in South Africa, which black supremacists and their supporters quite falsely claim was a “cornerstone of apartheid” and “land theft” from the African people.

    ARP1576224

    The TAU is the oldest agricultural union in South Africa and has been in existence since 1897.

    “Common currency has it that whites ‘stole’ land from indigenous blacks and that this theft was legally ratified by the 1913 and 1936 Land Acts which divided up the land and codified these divisions,” the TAU report said.

    In reality, “whites who came to South Africa in 1652 and thereafter found a land devoid of basic development and infrastructure, sparsely populated by meandering tribes who had no written word and whose way of life was the absolute antithesis of Western mores.

    “It is now acknowledged that the Khoi-San groups, and their sub-groups, are the indigenous peoples of South Africa.

    “Whites and black African groups arrived in various parts of the country around the same time. They met at the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and wars followed.”

    The TAU also pointed out that prior to the arrival of the whites, the black population—which as pointed out above, arrived simultaneously with the European settlers and therefore have no more claim to the country than the whites—did not have any concept of land ownership or even writing.

    “Man in his primitive state did not know the concept of ‘land tenure,’” the report continued.

    “When hunter/gatherer groups formed, the first land tenure (if it can be called that) was by nature communal. Before the arrival of the European in South Africa with his tradition of individual land ownership, communal tenure in Africa was the norm.

    “The territory inhabited and/or cultivated by a particular ethnic group was owned and/or utilized by the tribe in the name of their king or chief. Because there was no written word among these peoples, Christian missionaries took it upon themselves to learn and then write and codify the languages of the black people to whom they were ministering. They then taught these people to read and write their own language.”

    “It is known that a great migration of black people took place from the Great Lakes region southwards, eventually reaching Southern Africa. Numerous reports exist as to which tribe went where. But these reports are not the historical property of the black peoples.

    “Thus their claims to land in South Africa have no empirical foundation. They are based on oral history and folklore, and what was observed by early European travelers and missionaries, by the British colonial presence in the country, by Boer trekkers and administrators.

    “If your history is written by others, with what can you contest this history? However, the early settled areas of the black people were later generally recognized as their core areas.”

    “From the very beginning of settlement, black and white were segregated. South African history is replete with clashes over land ‘ownership’. There were no title deeds, no courts to decide who owned what.

    “Proclamations and annexations were followed by wars, clashes, agreements and disagreements, theft of livestock, sloppy boundaries and arguments over the measurement and surveying of land; borders were drawn and re-drawn; people moved all over the place and a completely differing approach to farming by both groups existed.

    “In the black community, land was communal and the product of their agricultural activities was mainly for their own consumption. This was subsistence farming, and it persists in today’s South Africa.

    “ Soon after the formation of the Union of South Africa in 1910, it was deemed imperative to settle the land question once and for all. The government (still under the British Crown) believed that if land could not be partitioned and allocated within the ambit of a Western title deed system, the very future of South Africa would be put at risk.

    “The most immediate problem was food production for a burgeoning population. (It was obvious to the British then that blacks could not produce food for surplus, and to this day this is still the case).

    “The core reason for the 1913 Land Act’s passing was the security of the whites, and particularly the farmers, to give them the necessary security of tenure on their farms to produce the food for what was still a country under the British flag, controlled essentially from London. Gold and diamonds had been discovered, and Britain was not going to give up this new jewel in the Crown.

    “Antagonists of the 1913 Act and indeed the 1936 Act should look to Britain for redress. These pieces of legislation were not apartheid Acts—they were devised in South Africa under a government controlled by Britain.

    “The current population of South Africa according to Stats SA is 52,98 million. As quoted by the SA Institute of Race Relations’ Yearbook 2012, the population of the country in 1911 was blacks: 4,018 million, whites: 1,276 million; coloreds: 525,466 and Indians: 152,094.

    “The percentages were white: 21% and black: 67%. One hundred years later, the percentage population increase of blacks was 920%.

    “But land in South Africa is a political tool. It is wielded without thought for the morrow. It is proffered within the context of a cultural more that has no place in today’s practical world. The division of land under the 1913 Land Act is a blunt weapon used to garner votes by the present SA government to seduce naïve and mostly uneducated followers who cannot feed themselves but who are asked to look upon those who can feed them as ogres who stole their land.”

  15. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Watching

    Even accepting your simplifications it is reasonable to ask you to spell out
    1. What differences in legal title you recognise when you refer to the “land and rights of another people” considering the different systems by which individuals or families or institutions could/can have title and those where there is nothing but e.g. seasonal grazing grounds for a whole tribe (who might have had to battle for it from time to time) but, maybe, a much bigger population could be supported by irrigation and agriculture (If that is relevant as it would have to be in some circumstances)?
    2.What constitutes “usurping”
    3. Is there any period of limitation on the duty to treat the usurpation as criminal? How about the Normans in England, Wales and Ireland? How about the white Canadians in Newfoundland? The white genes in every descendant of Tasmanian Aborigines? Each remnant of a Native American tribe? Etc. etc.

  16. What are “colonists in the normal sense” and from what other kind of colonists are they to be distinguished? Also: “Nothing in Afrikaner rule, even at its least enlightened, can match such episodes in American history”. So what? Proving that A is less evil then B doesn’t prove that A isn’t evil. Is Hitler to be considered a “good guy” simply because he murdered fewer people than Stalin?

    • Replies: @MacNucc11
  17. Malla says:

    The much-decried “Bantu education” system under Apartheid was better than what ANC ruled South Africa currently offers school children, a leading black academic has announced.

    https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2013-08-15-bantu-education-was-better-academic/

    Bantu education was better: academic
    15 August 2013

    The apartheid-era Bantu education system was much better than the current education regime, a Wits academic said in Pretoria on Thursday.

    “It was far better in terms of quality than the education that our kids are receiving nowadays. That is where the problem is,” Rabelani Dagada, a lecturer at Wits Business School, told a debate on affirmative action.

    “Affirmative action should be about empowerment. The best way to empower is not to take from those who have and give to those who don’t have. It won’t work.”

    Dagada said South Africans could only be empowered through proper education.

    “After 20 years of democracy, the education levels have plunged. It’s worse than the so-called Bantu education. The best way to do transformation, empowerment is to provide quality education.”

  18. HdC says:
    @Apex Predator

    If you cannot take the heat get out of the kitchen!
    Ie. don’t declare war on Germany, bomb its citizens, and then whine and moan that those nasty Germans retaliated.
    Mind you, typical British nonsense.

    • Replies: @Anon
  19. Malla says:

    Before 1902 there was no black problem in the two Boer republics. The big black homelands (Zululand and Xhosaland) were outside of these republics. The mass black immigration started when the British Empire took control of the republics to provide cheap labour for the Jewish mines but also to force a multi-cultural problem onto the “rebellious” Boer nation. After the republics were swallowed up into what became South Africa under the British, the policy of Apartheid was the only means the Boers had to correct the 46 years long open border policy the British forced on them. And even then the Banking elites of London had a hand in the assassination of South African Prime Minister Verwoerd who was making good progress and gaining the support of the various black tribal leaders.

  20. Malla says:

    Very interesting piece about life in Rhodesia, what it was really like

    https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    Requiem for Rhodesia by Carlos Whitlock Porter

    Some snippets:

    “Salisbury is pronounced “Sauls-bry”, not Sal-is-berry. Wages are low and prices are high. It is one of the only two countries in the world which declared their independence from Britain illegally. The other one is having a holiday this year [the United States, celebrating the 200th anniversary of its own UDI].

    Is there apartheid in Rhodesia? No.

    …snip…

    “You can wait behind Africans in the post office. You can marry an Africa if you get permission. You can drink with Africans, even though normally they will not drink with you; there is a hotel between Stanley and Speke Streets in Salisbury, with a European bar on Stanley and an African bar on Speke. European means white, even if you are Japanese. They are not labelled: if you shoul d happen to enter the African bar, you will simply be told that your bar is around the corner. It is extremely difficult to mistake them, since the African bars are so much noisier. ”

    …snip…

    The University of Rhodesia at Salisbury is 50% African; in 1973 it was 10%, but due to excrement in the showers and other complaints the opinion became widespread that you had to go to South Africa to get a good education.

    You cannot, however, go to the largest (and one of the best) sports arenas in Rhodesia; that is reserved for non-whites only.

    …snip….

    “But with this difference: the average wage for a white man when I was there was 150 Rhodesian dollars a month, then about 300 American dollars; not much. But it costs 150 Rhodesian dollars a month to rent a house. An African could earn 10 dollars a week and rent a house which was in many cases almost identical from the government for 10 dollars a month. You are always hearing about their low wages, but you never hear about what they get for free. There are African, Asian, “Coloured”, and European areas in Salisbury itself which you cannot tell apart without looking at the people — attractive modern bungalows, some with cars parked outside, with the victims of oppression chatting casually in the front gardens. Whether or not these are a showcase I don’t know, but I can tell you they are resented by Rhodesian taxpayers.

    Life is a constant struggle for the white Rhodesians, who must work nine hours a day, husband and wife, to keep ahead of the Africans, who are constantly learning new skills and moving into new jobs. Food, beer, and cigarettes are cheap, but manufactured items are fantastically expensive.

    As they struggle to save, they see the African renting the best house he’s ever had from the government for a week’s wages; paying no income taxes; doing no compulsory military service; getting free medical care in modern hospitals; paying at the most a few cents for travel, concerts, sports events; packing the house with relatives; putting his wife to work in the garden; growing his own food and tobacco; brewing his own beer; sitting in the sun smoking cigarettes and saving his money to buy a bicycle. And all this with only one of them working!

    This is in contrast to the propaganda picture which shows the bloated whites lounging around the swimming pools enjoying the semi-slavery of the starving blacks who spend all their time shouting “Zimbabwe, we want out country”, and who, of course, are just like white people except for the colour of their skin. Could it be that we have been misinformed?

    Could it be that we have been misinformed by the same people who told us that the Viet Cong were not Communist; then, that they Communist, but not backed by Hanoi; that they were backed by Hanoi, but that Hanoi had no troops in the south; that they had troops in the south, but that if we stopped the bombing they would negotiate; that they were not negotiating, but that if we ever did reach an agreement they would respect it; that if we withdrew our troops the war would end; that the war was continuing, but that Hanoi was not taking over the south; that Hanoi was taking over the south, but that none of the other “dominoes” would follow; that the other “dominoes” were following, but that there would be no bloodbath; that there was a bloodbath, but that it did not really matter very much anyhow. “

    • Replies: @Malla
  21. Malla says:
    @Malla

    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    “Africans work long hours, but they are not generally expected to work hard. It is more common to see one or two at work and four or five asleep. On one occasion Africans were photographed asleep in a park in South Africa. This was shown on television in Britain saying that they had been killed by the police.”

    …snip….
    I knew another African in Johannesburg who got together with his relatives and bought a brand-new van for cash; he used to pick up his employer and charge him a fortune to take him around town. Poor old Billy (the employer) lived in an old busted down dump with damp walls (in Johannesburg, which is notoriously dry), and drove an old clunker. This was the owner of an established piano business left him by his father, and he was convinced his employees lived better than he did.

    Cars are scarce in Rhodesia, where a cheap second hand one costs between one and two thousand Rhodesian dollars, but the percentage of car ownership (cash down) is higher among South African blacks than it is in the Soviet Union.”

    At a dance, one tribe will get up and dance, the other will sit down; half the audience will smile and joke, and other half will not. These are different tribes. If you build a township for one tribe, they will not tolerate members of other tribes living there. They will not tolerate members of other related tribes from different parts of Rhodesia, Zambia, or Mozambique living there. They will not dance together; they will not sit together; they will not talk to each other; they will not intermarry; they will not work together without frequent killing.

    …snip…
    “Africa is the most racist country on earth”, an African medical student studying in Spain told me once, “I come from a little country about this big” (indicating a coffee cup), “Spanish Guinea, Equitorial Guinea”. He began naming regions in his country. “The people from the mountains hate the people from the jungles, the people from the jungles hate the people from the plains, the people from the plains hate the people from the coast, the people from the countryside hate the people from the cities, the people in the cities hate everybody… what can you do?”

    Colonial history has been somewhat peculiarly distorted. The British were invited into Zambia to protect the inhabitants from the Matabele, and entered East Africa to destroy the Arab slave trade. Perhaps those vociferous African converts to Mohammedanism would be amused to find themselves in the hands of an Islamic specialist in the castration of Negroes to be sold as harem guards.”

    …snip….

    “Reporters who visit the white-rule states think they know better than the people who live there. At one time this would have been called “prejudice”. Such people know all the facts except the obvious ones, and constantly pretend that if Africans were treated as something which they are not, African would be as democratic as Switzerland. The truth is that Africans will not share power with each other, much less with you, and such theorists are seldom willing to invest their own lives and property in the experiment.

    • Replies: @Malla
  22. MacNucc11 says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    But at least she does try and that counts for something.

  23. Malla says:
    @Malla

    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html
    Rhodesia has segregated schools. Whites are fee-paying, black schools are free; the whites pay twice, tuition and tax as well. Blacks are educated separately from each other. Why not? Every time you put them together, they kill each other.

    …snip….

    All politics in Africa is tribal. Politics, religion, colour, are just new names. Parties are organized along tribal lines. If two tribes are enemies (and they are nearly all enemies), and one fights for the terrorists, the others will either fight for the whites or form their own “terr” groups and fight each other. The three Marxist terrorist armies in Angola reported each other’s troop movements to the Portuguese for years. The Frente Nacional, for example (FNLA) was made up of Bakongo tribesmen from across the Angoloa-Congo (Zaire) border, and was later backed by that country in its civil war against the Movimento Popular (MPLA) and the União Nacional (UNITA). These others had been geographical and tribal enemies of the Bakongos for years.

    Mozambique had two main tribes, the Macua and the Makonde (I am sorry to say I don’t remember which is which). One lived on both sides of the Tanzanian border and made up the main forces of the Frelimo (Frente de Liberacão de Moçambique) terrorists. The others, two million strong, fought for the Portuguese and made up 60% of their army. When “independence” came, they asked Frelimo for elections and were told politely to go to hell. Where is all the talk about stopping Communism by satisfying the “legitimate aspirations” of these people?

    In Rhodesia there are two main terrorist groups following the same pattern.

    It is useless to wait for “education” to de-tribalize the Africans. Tribe is as fundamental as nation, language, religion, culture. The only de-tribalized Africans in the world are the descendents of the New World slaves. Uprooted by force; deliberately mixed; taught an alien language; dumped on the other side of the world for two centuries; outnumbered and educated by whites — how else could it be done? The New World Negroes are the only ones born speaking a common language (English, Spanish, or Portuguese). They are the only ones who accept the racially mixed as belonging to their own race.

    The African “coloured” (with European, Indian, Malay, Hottentot or Chinese ancestry) belongs to no tribe — is accepted nowhere — has no culture of his own, and has a significantly higher rate of social problems than the African. This is one reason why interracial sex was made a criminal offence in South Africa.

    …snip….

    “Critics of racial separation stress its discriminatory aspects while ignoring the practical reasons for its existence. Port Shepstone, South Africa, had a very high burglary rate. An ordinance was passed making it illegal for blacks to be in town past eight o’clock at night. The burglary rate fell to zero.

    One has to live in these countries to experience the relaxed racial atmosphere which normally prevails in contrast to comparable areas of America. It is common even in “tension-ridden” Johannesburg to chat with an African on a street corner over “whose bus will come first –yours or mine?” Since there are more buses for Africans than for whites, it is usually yourself who waves goodbye and continues to wait

    …snip…
    The system of independent tribal homelands in South Africa is in fact identical to those “black republics” once demanded by American black radicals. The latter are the only areas in the world where blacks can rule free from the conflicting and sometimes violent ambitions of other races and tribes.

    However, even these areas, set up and educated for responsible democratic government by the South African government at great expense, reject democracy and voting at the first available opportunity to do so. In one of these states, the first royal act of King Jonathan, “the world’s longest reigning monarch”, who had ruled his people longer than Queen Victoria had ruled hers, was to abolish Parliament, outlaw the opposition parties, and declare a dictatorship within several days of independence. The first act of independent Ovamboland was to institute public floggings. The world protested and blamed South Africa. South Africa asked them to stop it. They replied that they were independent now, it was a tribal custom, and they could do what they liked.

    Yet African agitators demand the vote in Rhodesia. The agitators have it already, since most of them are educated; they wish the vote so as to get themselves into office to declare a dictatorship of their own.

    A leader of the Rhodesian African nationalists in London has declared that “majority” rule for Rhodesia will involve no pretense at parliamentary government. It will be the usual dictatorship of a self-appointed minority.”

    • Replies: @Malla
  24. jim jones says:

    Nobody cares about the Boers. Just like the Russians they are perpetual losers:

    • Replies: @Bill Holdon
    , @Mark54
  25. MacNucc11 says:
    @Michael Kenny

    I think her point though is that it would be pretty hypocritical of Stalin to be pointing a finger at Hitler.

  26. Malla says:
    @Malla

    More from https://www.cwporter.com/rhodesia.html

    “This is the African who goes about promising his fellows that when the Europeans are expelled, all Africans will drive cars.This is the African who promises UN posts to illiterates. This is the African who goes on speaking tours in Europe and is interviewed by the world’s journalists.

    In Malawi the word for “politician” is “Wa-Benz”. “Wa” is “man”, and “Benz”, of course, is Mercedes-Benz.”

    ….snip….
    “Oh really, why not? Oh, well, it seems the Zambian army killed three tourists yesterday and we might get shot down.

    These tourists came from my hotel and were having a picnic on the Rhodesian side in their bathing suits. Two were killed immediately by machine gun fire from the Zambian side and the third, one of the girls, hid behind a rock for half an hour waist deep in the crocodile-infested water until they moved the guns and killed her. The body was never found.

    The Zambians accused them of trying to swim across to their side of the river to blow up a power station. Sure. Through forty-nine million gallons of water a minute rushing through a narrow gorge and the shallows full of crocs.

    These teenagers were American or Canadian, but no note of protest was ever forthcoming to the Zambian government because of it. It was Rhodesia’s fault for creating tension in the area and the Americans should not have been their. (I believe it was in Uganda about 8 years go that two American newspaper reporters were killed and fed to crocs for witnessing the murder of an entire army barracks. The American government demanded an investigation and was perfectly satisfied when the chief suspect was placed in charge.)

    What if the Rhodesian Army had killed Americans having a picnic in Zambia?
    It was in connection with this incident that Ian Smith said,
    “If your skin is black, you will be forgiven anything.””

    …snip…..

    “In Africa, European-owned farms, homes, and businesses are tolerated only until the Africans can stand the chaos created by their confiscation. The owners are given 24 hours to leave the country with two suitcases and a few dollars; or they are given cash and expelled, but are prohibited by “exchange control regulations” from taking the cash with them; or they are paid off with government bonds which do not mature for 25 years and can be repudiated by any succeeding government; or they are terrorized by thugs and are told by the police, “If you don’t like it, why don’t you get out of the country!” Then technicians are imported to exploit the resources created or discovered by the former whites. Statistics are falsified by equating the old whites with the new ones. “Despite the horror of the past, there are now 60,000 Belgians (or whatever), spread through the Congo, which once had 90,000, and the nation’s industries, commerce and transport system could not work without them”. Ah, but which ones are they?

    This is the new colonialism. We must help to kill the white Rhodesians so as to butter up the blacks into allowing us to help exploit their property, or the enormous mineral resources which the blacks were never aware of.”

    …snip…..

    “The terrorists are not freedom fighters. To be in the army in Rhodesia is relatively safe unless you happen to step on a landmine, run into an ambush, or catch up with someone you are chasing. Terrorists stay away from soldiers because soldiers carry guns. The purpose of terrorism is to discourage civilian cooperation with an established government. What is not safe is to be an unarmed African in a terrorist-infested zone. Such a person is likely to see his chief beaten to death, his wife and daughters raped, his sons kidnapped, his ears, lips and nose cut off “pour encourager les autres”. He will be told, “We are coming back. Do not tell the Europeans which way we went. We want so many bags of maize waiting for us when we return.” ”

    …snip….

    “Perhaps you have noticed that countries in which Africans hold all the land must subsist largely off foreign aid. The Frelimo government of Mozambique confiscated the homes and farms of a quarter million Portuguese, and then asked the Rhodesians to feed their starving population! As soon as they got their hands on a couple of trainloads of Rhodesian maize, they declared war on Rhodesia! They were instantly given a healthy dose of foreign aid “assistance” by Britain, whose socialist Prime Minister at that time owned five houses. ”

    …snip…

    “Do you remember the famous “Wiriyamu Massacre”? Where Portuguese soldiers were supposed to have killed 400 (or was it 463?) villagers in a village by that name? No village with that or any similar name in that area was ever proven to exist. Yet the stories of the Wiriyamu massacre and the search for the village of Wiriyamu made headlines all over the world for months. (Strangely enough, until the revolution in Portugal almost to the day.) This story was later found to have fabricated at a conference in Czechoslovakia. About the best thing you can say for newspapers is that they will print anything that makes money. ”

    …snip….
    Recently an un-elected American official [Henry Kissinger], without the knowledge or consent of the American people, attempted to commit his adopted country to the support of several un-elected Communist dictatorships in their voting-rights war against Rhodesia, a country which that official has never even visited.

    Since Mr. Kissinger is a refugee from Nazi Germany, it is apparent that he feels something less than grateful: Rhodesian had the highest killed-in-action ratio of any Commonwealth country during WWII.

    Rhodesia would accept Mr. Kissinger; Rhodesia would protect his life, his family, his property, his religion; it would allow him full citizenship after two years.

    Can he say the same for Zambia or Mozambique, where religious minorities are tortured, killed, driven into the jungles to starve, where churches are abolished and religion is illegal?

    Neither has there ever been any anti-Semitic legislation in South Africa, where Jews enjoy full political rights.

    South African Jews are among the richest in the world. They are the second greatest single source of Israeli foreign exchange. They have been allowed to do this in a very short time. And they have almost single-handedly financed the movement towards black rule in that country. They are also known to pay or treat their Africans no better than anyone else, as personal experience and strikes at Mr. Oppenheimer’s diamond company can soon attest.
    …snip…

    The willingness of South African Jews to repay with contempt the privileges and opportunities of citizenship in one of the richest (and freest) countries of the world, to which most of them fled as penniless refugees, has caused them to be widely hated.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Them Guys
  27. shegetz says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Merkel, as you likely know, was a leading Communist, currently masquerading as a conservative.

    We are in an age of dysgenics and saturation with subversion. I do not know enough about history to draw comparison, but there is very likely method to the madness.

    “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand”

    … attributed to Jesus Christ (Matthew 12:25) but can as readily be seen in this onslaught to splinter nation states with so-called multiculturalism. The age old principle of divide and rule.

    Al-Hijrah enabled by a Jewish elite is a form of warfare on the Western white gentile. As you wonder, the motive may well be the dissolution of the nation state. As much is known in earlier publications of the CFR.

  28. shegetz says:

    HRC planned to grant amnesty to perhaps 20M illegals. The USA system allows daisy chain family immigration. This would have meant a real total of 100M new immigrants. They would vote for their master. The master would then put to them that the US Constitution is racist and needs to go. But before that would work, citizens would need to be weakened or properly defanged. In the UK, I understand Boris J was in favor of amnesty for the 1M illegals there. Theoretically less chance of civil war as the guns are already removed.

    Personally, if it goes much further, I am wondering what whites will do. There are many of us and there is a very hostile situation for us brewing by our elites for their own reasons.

    • Replies: @Malla
  29. twango says:

    @ shegetz

    What was it all for when the Jewish elite sell us out like this today?

    What does that mean? Perhaps you’d like to enlarge on this thesis. It lacks detail.

    • Replies: @shegetz
  30. Malla says:
    @jilles dykstra

    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    LOL India is already going deep under Jewry as we speak.

    MODI APCO SHIN BET

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2018/03/27/modi-apco-shin-bet/

    A PR firm run by the ‘chosens’ handled Modi’s election campaign. Including the Shining Gujrat b.s.(Gujrat, the state where Modi was chief minister before becoming Prime Minister)

    Also, check out their outreach to (influence in) the Indian media.

    THE KOSHER “EDUCATION” OF INDIAN MEDIA

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/the-kosher-education-of-indian-media/

    Israeli security firms, closely connected to the Israeli Military, provide security to the Indian Parliament !

    UNIT 8200 ,SERAYET MATKAL AND INDIAS CYBER SECURITY

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/unit-8200-serayet-matkal-and-indias-cyber-security/

    Some notable Israeli companies (all closely connected to the Israeli Military) which deserve mention
    NICE Systems, (High Tech recording of the Indian Parliament )
    Akamai Technologies (Election Commission Of India Private mobile Handsets)
    ECI Telecom ,(ECI’s top position in the Indian transmission market, with 25% share of the country’s metro optical network hardware market.)

    Below we observe Hinjew Indians proudly announce how they are preparing to be good Goyim slaves to the Top Dog Jews

    As far as China

    CHINAS “REVOLUTIONARY” JEWS

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/jews-in-china-mao-era/

    CHINESE COMMUNISM? YES BUT IT WAS JEWISH WHEN IT STARTED

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/06/07/chinese-communism-yes-but-it-was-jewish-when-it-started/

    The money looted out of China during the Opium War was itself used to fund Mao and his CCP movement. The elites are deviously brilliant or what?

    Also
    HOW ISRAEL USED WEAPONS AND TECHNOLOGY TO BECOME AN ALLY OF CHINA

    https://www.newsweek.com/china-israel-military-technology-beijing-jerusalem-saul-eisenberg-weapons-607117

    Taking over the non White world will be much easier than you think. Lots of corrupt people, people who will sell anything for a few shekels.

    • Replies: @MacNucc11
    , @Respect
  31. Che Guava says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Since you have already said it, no need for me to post a reminder.

    As for the internment of ‘Japanese-Americans’, from reading Japanese sources, this may have been better if more selective, but there were many spies on Oahu.

    In California, the majority of adults of Japanese descent were members of the ‘Imperial Rule Assistance Association’, by ‘imperial’ they did not mean Napoleon or the George who was king of England at the time.

    Much spying in California, too.

    The Imperial Rule Assistance Association was one of the several pillars of our version of fascism.

    So, though they should have been more differentiated on such bases, internment was totally logical.

    Modern U.S.A. accounts of the injustice are laughable.

    They were not treated inhumanely.

    That is not to say that Pearl Harbour was not a trap set by the U.S.A. prez to make an excuse to godawaah, and very evil he was in that. His true interest was in Europe, not the Pacific and eastern Asia.

    • Replies: @Malla
  32. Truth says:
    @Malla

    So what did I learn on this thread?

    Black people are horrible to each other, and the Anglos killed a hell of a lot more Boers (white people) than the black people did.

    In other words, “nothing.”

    • Replies: @Malla
  33. shegetz says:
    @twango

    Rendering the white gentiles minority in their lands, those that fought tyrants, is not something taken lightly.

    Perhaps you’d elaborate on your interest.

  34. Erebus says:
    @jilles dykstra

    However, do not quite see how China, Russia, India, S America, Muslims, wherever they live, will accept world control by jewry.

    For all but (arguably) the first two, it’s very easy to see. They’ll accept it because they’ll be unaware of it. Europeans and N. Americans accepted it without a murmur because they had little idea of it, and had much to distract them. Why wouldn’t the rest?
    Russia & China are outliers. They’re blessed by the fact that their current elites are hyper-sensitive to how power operates in the world for the simple reason that they aspire to take the heart of it. They know who has to be taken down a notch, and they know from whence power springs.

  35. shegetz says:

    A curiosity. I just plugged in Hijrah into Jewish cuckcuckgo and guess what? NOTHING about the reality of the term. It is apparently a mosque in north Virginia, not a religious imperative to invade Dar Al-Harb, fellow dhimmis. Fancy that.

  36. @jilles dykstra

    The original black inhabitants of SA died out from disease after contact with the Boers. Other blacks came south into SA only because the Boers offered them jobs in farming, etc. The blacks there now are not the original inhabitants of SA and have now stolen the land from the Boers and Brits.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  37. MacNucc11 says:
    @Malla

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler. Don’t bet on China throwing in. Communism is all but done and they are hardcore nationalists. They also have no shame which is in their favor.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Bliss
  38. @Malla

    Whites and black African groups arrived in various parts of the country around the same time. They met at the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and wars followed.

    Whites first settled the Western Cape, where a few Khoikhoi/Hottentots lived. When whites expanded to other other areas, they encountered Bantu people, who had displaced the San and Khoikhoi centuries earlier.

    • Replies: @Malla
  39. Okechukwu says:

    I see Malla is spamming another thread with his unadulterated nonsense.

  40. Okechukwu says:
    @George F. Held

    The original black inhabitants of SA died out from disease after contact with the Boers. Other blacks came south into SA only because the Boers offered them jobs in farming, etc. The blacks there now are not the original inhabitants of SA and have now stolen the land from the Boers and Brits.

    Fake history. A little research will disabuse you of this stupidity.

  41. Malla says:
    @Truth

    Black people are horrible to each other, and the Anglos killed a hell of a lot more Boers (white people) than the black people did.

    Human nature.

    In other words, “nothing.”

    My apologies for your time wasted.

  42. Malla says:
    @MacNucc11

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler.

    That may be true but ironically it is also a country where there is a lot of devotion and love for Jews. Hinjews…er… Hindus will compete with Christian Zionists in ‘kissing Jew butt’ contests.

  43. Malla says:
    @Che Guava

    Is it true that the “chosen of Yahweh” “took over” a large number of the businesses built up by the Japanese during the internment?

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  44. @Malla

    They then taught these people to read and write their own language.

    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics. We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    The East Asians and Mesopotamians with their primitive pictographic languages at least managed to innovate an impressive amount given the limitations. Africans never innovated even the most basic of concepts like the wheel. Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.

  45. APilgrim says:

    If memory serves, the USA abortion death count since Roe-v-Wade is ~65M.

    Dead Black Babies are statistically the relative highest percentage, & close to the top numerically.

    When will the slaughter stop, and the DENIALS begin?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  46. @Beefcake the Mighty

    What’s funny about the dancing video is that the British press is completely obsessed with it, while ignoring her damaging and lethal comments about land confiscation. In other words, the Brits love to chatter about optics and social faux pas, proving yet again that they’re highly overrated as a so-called thinking peoples.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  47. Malla says:
    @shegetz

    Theoretically less chance of civil war as the guns are already removed.

    The British government supplies guns to minority communities. That is the opinion in many black communities in London. What they mean is that the government supplies guns so that they kill each other. But that makes no sense whatsoever. Why get them in the land, in the first place only to help kill each other. The truth is the outsiders are being brought in since Windrush, post WW2, to create the forces which will be unleashed on the native Britons in the future, they are building up the numbers slowly. They will be the shock troops used in a future Bolshevik takeover. The native Britons are more or less de-armed. There is no ‘Right to bear arms’ enshrined in a constitution in Britain, Australia (where a false flag event was used to take the guns away), Canada etc… The fact that White Americans have guns, this fact alone have put the brakes on many plans of the globalist elites. The moment they lose their guns, the policies of the elites will fast forward across the world. If a Brazillian in Brazil had some knowledge of how the world really works, he would be praying in his Catholic Church that the Americans can keep their guns, Turks in Ankara would be praying in their mosques, that the Americans have their guns forever, Hindus should be praying in their temples in India that Americans be able to keep their guns, Thais should be praying in their Buddhist Temples that Americans be able to keep their guns.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Wizard of Oz
  48. republic says:
    @Bragadocious

    Not a very good article. This writer’s race caused a lot of the problems the Boers today are facing in South Africa.

    Before he died in 2002, the late great white nationalist, Dr. Pierce gave a lot of speeches which are still available today on the real reasons for why the last white government gave up its rule in SA.

    The lesson of South Africa

    said among other things that the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers, also the jews were pumping spiritual poison into the White population urging them to surrender rather than fight. But Pierce said it was the betrayal by the Boer establishment- the Boer politicians and church leaders and big businessmen which sealed the fate of South Africa

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
    , @peterAUS
  49. Malla says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Allowing them in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization.

    Well I agree with you that the best solution for the race problem would be complete separation. The failure is of the White race which went about trying to spread Western civilization everywhere. Big mistake. There are genetic racial differences on AVERAGE in outlook towards everything. Our brains are wired differently it seems. Not completely differently, we have a lot of similarities as humans but there are differences enough to make multi racial/ multi cultural societies failures in the long run. This whole project was bound to fail. That is why the White Africans either should leave or get their own republics. There is no other option.

    However I have come across black people who are good, well mannered, kind and intelligent, mostly educated Africans and a few black Americans too. I have come across honest good Jewish people too. Maybe they are some kind of minority in their group. Indeed some of the blacks I knew were better than most Indians I know. There are variations in every race.

    Check out the Congolese guy at 28:01 to 33:38

    I have an Indian friend who does some business in Africa something to do with the sugarcane industry. He told me he would rather do business with blacks and whites than Indians because Indians never pay for service rendered. White customers in general were the best, the black business customer will eventually pay up but Indians just do not pay. He avoids Indian customers like hell even though he is Indian himself. But there are honest Indians too. Just that the percentage out of a population is smaller.

    So I do not think it is possible to judge an individual as all individuals do not behave as the AVERAGE of their groups. But we make stereotypes to protect ourselves as it is not possible to know the nature of each and every stranger, we do not have time and have to make quick decisions.

    But I still agree that complete separation of the races is the best option. Whites and blacks should separate out and leave and live in peace.

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
  50. The author doesn’t like any of the racial separation laws that were on the books in S.A. when it was controlled by whites but doesn’t realize that you can’t have it both ways. Either blacks are kept under control or be excluded completely from the country. To not control them you have the U.S. or Brazil where feral blacks victimize whites on a constant basis. Whites and blacks simply cannot live together, blacks will always be a burden.

  51. Bliss says:
    @MacNucc11

    I have also read that one of the most popular books in India is Mein Kampf, by A. Hitler.

    This self-loathing Indian Malla must be the sales agent in India for Mein Kampf.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer, the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”. He has dedicated his life to bashing the “subhuman” race he was unfortunately born into.

    What a pathetic creature…

    • Agree: Okechukwu
    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  52. Joe Wong says:
    @Anonymous

    Well, the American can do better than a Jewess, the Americans even bombed, killed and waterboarded millions of people for decades on fabricated WMD allegations without provocation, wage an all out trade war by allege Chinese stealing their technologies without proof, while they are benefiting handsomely from Chinese supplied cheap and quality materials to maintain their living standard that they cannot afford themselves, etc.

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate ….

    • LOL: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Anonymous
    , @Them Guys
  53. @republic

    the Dutch Reform church betrayed the Boers

    Of course it did. Look how the Catholic Church has betrayed white Catholics, the evangelical churches have betrayed white evangelicals, etc, ad nauseum.

    For all the awareness of Jewish manipulation around here, it’s absolutely astounding how stupid Christians are on the topic of the grandest manipulation foisted on their ancestors and which their ancestors foisted upon them. Too stupid to realize Tinkerbelle isn’t real, that it’s a retarded fable of desert dwelling morons, they suck it up like soy milkshakes. They have Faith that they are exactly the same as Africans (maybe they are on a cognitive level) because some desert rat’s desiccated scrolls tell them they’re all created in Tinkerbelle’s image.

    The stupidity of adhering to Neolithic sand myths in the Space Age is equalled only by the hypocrisy of blaming the Jews for all our troubles while worshippers a Jew god. Meanwhile, they mock moron Mormans for believing the exact same stupidity (lone nutcase on a mountain talking to himself) with the sole addition of an alien planet named Kolob.

    If we truly are too stupid to shrug off this yoke of imbecility, I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.

    Fortunately, I have a sense of humor and delight in the knowledge that the Jews will be the first to go and entirely as a result of their own dissembling nonsense. Booble Thumping Christians will be next and once they’re gone the inbred low IQ Hinpoohs won’t stand a chance. The poor Buttists will see it coming, but by then the tsunami will be unstoppable. Goodbye Civilization. See you again in another 70,000 years perhaps…

    • Replies: @Bliss
    , @anarchyst
    , @APilgrim
  54. @Malla

    I have come across black people who are good, well mannered, kind and intelligent, mostly educated Africans and a few black Americans too. I have come across honest good Jewish people too. Maybe they are some kind of minority in their group.

    That’s the same fallacious reasoning that has created the USA (and global) impending collapse. You cannot judge on the outliers or freaks. You cannot make bathroom rules for 300,000,000 people based on a handful of insane freaks who chop off their own penis. You cannot say, “Bantus are the same as us” just because you’ve met one who seemed awfully similar except skin pigmentation and tendency towards obesity and diabetes.

    When half the poopulation of India is still shitting in the streets and water supplies of India, you cannot claim “Indians are a smart and advanced race.” When half of whites still believe in fairies, you cannot really say we are a scientifically advanced race. Eugenics was and still is the only way our species advances. After just a hundred years of abandonment of eugenic principles, one doesn’t need to look very far ahead to see the end of everything and return to the Stone Age.

    • Replies: @Malla
  55. Okechukwu says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Indeed, just google “African alphabet.” This is a population that never developed any form of written communication nor mathematics.

    Can you identify any ancient manuscripts from North, West or Central Europe? Any papyri? Stone tablets? Symbolic pictography? Anything? Europeans were some of the last adopters of writing. And it was imposed on them, they couldn’t figure it out on their own.

    On the other hand:

    Ancient African Writing

    http://www.taneter.org/writing.html

    On math.

    Ancient African Mathematics

    http://www.taneter.org/math.html

    13 Interesting Facts About Math in Ancient Africa

    https://blog.mindresearch.org/blog/math-facts-ancient-africa

    Mathematics in (central) Africa before colonization

    http://etopia.sintlucas.be/3.14/Ishango_meeting/Mathematics_Africa.pdf

    Your lies are too easy to refute, bruh.

  56. TG says:

    The white minority government of South Africa DID do something evil… it just never gets mentioned.

    They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked. But in the long run, poverty and political stability do not go together…

    South Africa used to be pretty prosperous, even with apartheid the blacks were doing not so bad. And of course, the fertility rate was pretty low, for blacks and whites alike. If the government had just let the people alone, perhaps they could have come to some sort of accommodation. But no, the elites – first white, then black – wanted their cheap labor. So the population of South Africa was deliberately tripled from about 20 million to about 60 million and climbing… and native blacks protesting this abusive open borders cheap-labor immigration policy, are slandered as ‘racist.’ Of course.

    But we can’t talk about how governments forcing population increases against the will of the general public drives wages down… no, that is taboo.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @peterAUS
  57. @jim jones

    If I were to believe all Boers were like those shown in the video, I would say let the african savages have them.

    • Replies: @bj
  58. Bliss says:
    @Stan d Mute

    I’m left only to think we deserve the fate of our Neanderthal ancestors in the coming tidal wave of Africans.

    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?

    • Replies: @Malla
  59. anarchyst says:
    @Stan d Mute

    The “beginning of the end” of traditional Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants who were involved in the “modernization” of the Catholic Church.

    [MORE]

    Much Catholic ritual and doctrine was discarded or changed, in order to reflect the “age” that we live in, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ and Christianity which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their “dirty work” for them…assigning Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death to the Jews, is NOT “blood libes” as, even today, Jews DO hate Jesus Christ and Christianity, their Talmud stating that “Jesus Christ is suffering in boiling excrement for eternity” while his mother Mary “conceived Jesus Christ with a Roman soldier”–Jewish Talmudic doctrine–not mine.
    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many traditional Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back” against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
    One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize pre-Vatican II principles.
    Fortunately, there are Catholic organizations that subscribe to pre-Vatican II principles, one being the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).

  60. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    self-loathing Indian Malla

    LOL I love myself too much. Ask my friends. When I was younger, my friends complained that I was a bit narcissistic.

    His “loyalty” to the defunct British Empire and it’s great admirer,

    Hey if there were positive sides to the British Empire why not? Facts are facts.

    the defeated and dead Hitler, is “unwavering and total”.

    Many Indian nationalists admire Hitler because he was a nationalist. Tough guys. Tough nationalist guys admire him. They do not need your permission, a permission of a foreigner, to admire the people they wish to admire. You have the right to decide what they admire or not?

    What a pathetic creature…

    LOL anything is better than being the hateful piece of shit that you are.

    • Replies: @Bliss
    , @Respect
  61. Che Guava says:
    @Malla

    I do nnt kmow about that, but if true, it would not surprise me at all.
    Just typical

  62. Malla says:
    @TG

    They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked. But in the long run, poverty and political stability do not go together…

    Very true. Blacks were rushing to get into “evil, apartheid” Africa. people vote with their feet.

  63. Joe Wong says:
    @shegetz

    The White Europeans including their offshoots is where is now, still filthy rich (although always complaining), because of those hundreds of millions of people all over the world who were robbed and murdered, those who become victims of their very madness of colonialism and orientalism, of the crusades and the slave and Opium trades. Cathedrals and palaces, museums and theatres, train stations – all had been constructed on horrid foundations of bones and blood, and amalgamated by tears. There were so many centuries of plunder that the acts of looting the world for the sole benefit of the few, turned into inseparable part of the ‘Western existence and culture’, something that gets almost never addressed, let alone criticized.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Anon
  64. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    He has dedicated his life to bashing the “subhuman” race he was unfortunately born into.

    Then should I be an Indian nationalist. Let me tell you about how Indian nationalist like folks think. OK. When I was a kid in class, my class mates who were all proud Indian nationalists believed
    1] We Indians are the most intelligent people on Earth.
    2] We had the most oldest and greatest civilization on Earth.
    3] White people are barbarians with no culture. They stole many ancient technologies from our ancient texts.
    You are happy till now. But let us go further in what they think
    4] Black Africans are junglee monkeys and savages. They are dumb brutes who live on trees.
    5] East Asians eat all sort of things. They have weird faces
    6] All non Indians have no culture, no civilization to be taken seriously. Only we have a culture.

    Are you happy now?
    I did rather stick with facts.

  65. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    What? You really think Europe would have been better off if it’s Neanderthal natives had not been replaced by humans from Africa?

    Except those humans had nothing to do with present day blacks

    Assuming the Out of Africa theory is true (ASSUMING), those early modern humans were not like today’s black Negroid people. Black Negroid people did not even exist when those early humans left Africa.This belief that Africa is a black only continent is wrong as hell. There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.
    The Manot skull, one of the first human skulls found in the Middle East is already similar to European skulls.
    Indeed black Negroids have genes which is not found in other humans but the blacks got it from archaic primitive humanoids before modern humans even left Africa. In other words, these humans who left Africa did not carry this gene which blacks got 150,000 years ago!!! How is that possible if blacks (who did not look like today’s blacks but are the ancestors of Negroid blacks) are the ancestors of the population who left Africa. This population which left Africa was a distinct population from black Negroid and may already have looked European or at least Caucasiod.
    Negroids have greater genetic diversity because they have absorbed genes from more primitive humanoids. In other words, the population which left Africa was a population which had nothing to do with the ancestors of black negroids (who had not yet evolved/ devolved into Negroids by then).

    • Replies: @Bliss
    , @Bliss
  66. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    LOL I love myself too much.

    Who are you kidding? You clearly suffer from a very deep seated inferiority complex. Which is why you have such a shamelessly slavish personality.

    • Replies: @Malla
  67. Malla says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Eugenics was and still is the only way our species advances.

    Very true. But the globalist elites would NEVER allow that. They want us all to become dumb and barbaric.

  68. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    they hate people different from they

    I guess most people in the world are like that.

    they hate people have independent mind

    People brainwashed by commies do not have independent minds.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  69. Before white man came to South Africa, a few hundreeds of thousands of people have lived there, mostly hunting big animals. White men established agriculture, mining, and later – the state, the industries and all the servicies. As they needed workers – Niggers from the rest of Africa have been comming there, because there has been the food, the salaries, schools, medical aid, and street security – things that other African states are suffering from the lack of it.

  70. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    You clearly suffer from a very deep seated inferiority complex.

    Please spare me your low IQ nonsense. I am just stating facts.
    I am human, I cannot fly as an eagle. I am just stating facts. Does this make me self hating?
    I was born as a human, without mechanical aid I cannot run as fast as a cheetah. Do I lose sleep over this? Do I hate myself over this? Do I dream of secretly being born a cheetah?
    It is you who are obsessed with White. You who are filled with hatred for White people. You need to see a psychiatrist.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  71. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    Lol at this black wannabe nordicist.

    Here’s what the British saw you as:

    https://dreamofacity.com/2016/12/19/bowbazar-to-former-black-town-calcutta/

    Calcutta in its heyday was divided into two main districts – White Town, which was where the British and other Europeans lived their lives and did their business, and Black Town, which was where the local Bengalis resided.

    In between White Town and Black Town, a kind of “grey area” emerged; a district in which everyone who was neither British nor Bengali were housed. Here in the area generally known as Bowbazar, one found Calcutta’s Chinatown, Muslim and Jewish Quarters, as well as communities of Buddhists, Parsis, Ismailis, Portuguese-Eurasians and Anglo-Indians.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Bliss
  72. Malla says:

    Which is why you have such a shamelessly slavish personality.

    Really? I am the one going against the convention here. The convention created by commie lies, commies funded by globalist elites. How am I slavish?

  73. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    Opium trades.

    Opium War and looting by evil YT?
    Lets discuss it shall we

    You cannot discuss the opium trade without discussing the Iraqi Jewish Sassoon family, the big kingpins on the trade. There are still docks and hospitals named after this family in India.

    The truth lies buried in the family line of David Sassoon, “The Rothschilds of The Far East,” and their monopoly over the opium trade.

    Britain won Hong Kong by launching the opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an entire nation!

    David Sassoon was born in Baghdad in 1792. His father, Saleh Sassoon, was a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, the governor of Baghdad. (Thus making him the “court Jew” – a highly influential position.)

    In 1829 Ahmet was overthrown due to corruption and the Sassoon family fled to Bombay, India. This was the strategic trade route to interior India and the gateway to the Far East. In a brief time the British government granted Sassoon “monopoly rights” to all manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most important of all – Opium – then the most addictive drug in the world!

    The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major opium exchanges in China.

    According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: “He employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews. . . and put them to work.”

    Sassoon’s sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China.

    More about them here

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/04/11/the-magnificent-sassoons-raking-money-off-chinese-and-indian-misery-with-british-troops/

    http://www.ibtimes.co.in/chinas-opium-war-was-completely-indian-enterprise-not-british-indian-author-amitav-ghosh-628177

    China’s Opium War Was ‘Completely Indian Enterprise’, not British: Indian Author Amitav Ghosh

    At this juncture he found that the first opium war in China was an Indian undertaking. “The first opium war (was) planned in India, it was financed by Indian money, it was fought with Indian soldiers. But it has all completely vanished from our historical memory,” Ghosh, whose third book of Ibis series ‘Flood of Fire’ is all about migration in the 1830s, told IANS.

    “The putting together of the expeditionary force took place in India. The British naval ships for the expedition were accompanied by 50 supply ships, all provided for by Parsi merchants in Bombay (now Mumbai). From top to bottom, it was a completely Indian enterprise; all the wherewithal for it came from India,” he added.

  74. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    Who opposed the Opium trade?
    Why Evil YT ofcourse.

    From

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium#Prohibition_and_conflict_in_China

    The opium trade incurred intense enmity from the later British Prime Minister William Ewart Gladstone.[65] As a member of Parliament, Gladstone called it “most infamous and atrocious” referring to the opium trade between China and British India in particular.[66] Gladstone was fiercely against both of the Opium Wars Britain waged in China in the First Opium War initiated in 1840 and the Second Opium War initiated in 1857, denounced British violence against Chinese, and was ardently opposed to the British trade in opium to China.[67] Gladstone lambasted it as “Palmerston’s Opium War” and said that he felt “in dread of the judgments of God upon England for our national iniquity towards China” in May 1840.[68] A famous speech was made by Gladstone in Parliament against the First Opium War.[69][70] Gladstone criticized it as “a war more unjust in its origin, a war more calculated in its progress to cover this country with permanent disgrace”.[71] His hostility to opium stemmed from the effects of opium brought upon his sister Helen.[72] Due to the First Opium war brought on by Palmerston, there was initial reluctance to join the government of Peel on part of Gladstone before 1841.[73]

    Scientific evidence of the pernicious nature of opium use was largely undocumented in the 1890s, when Protestant missionaries in China decided to strengthen their opposition to the trade by compiling data which would demonstrate the harm the drug did. Faced with the problem that many Chinese associated Christianity with opium, partly due to the arrival of early Protestant missionaries on opium clippers, at the 1890 Shanghai Missionary Conference, they agreed to establish the Permanent Committee for the Promotion of Anti-Opium Societies in an attempt to overcome this problem and to arouse public opinion against the opium trade. The members of the committee were John Glasgow Kerr, MD, American Presbyterian Mission in Canton; B.C. Atterbury, MD, American Presbyterian Mission in Peking; Archdeacon Arthur E. Moule, Church Missionary Society in Shanghai; Henry Whitney, MD, American Board of Commissioners for foreign Missions in Foochow; the Rev. Samuel Clarke, China Inland Mission in Kweiyang; the Rev. Arthur Gostick Shorrock, English Baptist Mission in Taiyuan; and the Rev. Griffith John, London Mission Society in Hankow.[75] These missionaries were generally outraged over the British government’s Royal Commission on Opium visiting India but not China. Accordingly, the missionaries first organized the Anti-Opium League in China among their colleagues in every mission station in China. American missionary Hampden Coit DuBose acted as first president. This organization, which had elected national officers and held an annual national meeting, was instrumental in gathering data from every Western-trained medical doctor in China, which was then published as William Hector Park compiled Opinions of Over 100 Physicians on the Use of Opium in China (Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press, 1899). The vast majority of these medical doctors were missionaries; the survey also included doctors who were in private practices, particularly in Shanghai and Hong Kong, as well as Chinese who had been trained in medical schools in Western countries. In England, the home director of the China Inland Mission, Benjamin Broomhall, was an active opponent of the opium trade, writing two books to promote the banning of opium smoking: The Truth about Opium Smoking and The Chinese Opium Smoker. In 1888, Broomhall formed and became secretary of the Christian Union for the Severance of the British Empire with the Opium Traffic and editor of its periodical, National Righteousness. He lobbied the British Parliament to stop the opium trade. He and James Laidlaw Maxwell appealed to the London Missionary Conference of 1888 and the Edinburgh Missionary Conference of 1910 to condemn the continuation of the trade. When Broomhall was dying, his son Marshall read to him from The Times the welcome news that an agreement had been signed ensuring the end of the opium trade within two years.

  75. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    slave trade

    Lets discuss this too.

    Check this out

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_Trade_Act_1807

    The Slave Trade Act 1807, officially the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act 1807,[1] abolished the slave trade in the British Empire, in particular the Atlantic slave trade, and also encouraged British action to press other European states to abolish their slave trades, but it did not abolish slavery itself. The United States, another major power involved in the Atlantic slave trade, passed the comparable Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves that same month, taking effect on 1 January 1808.

    The act was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed on 25 March 1807, with the title of “An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade”. The original act is in the Parliamentary Archives.

    Many of the supporters thought the Act would lead to the death of slavery, but it was not until 26 years later that slavery itself was actually abolished.

    And the Arabs still had black slaves upto 1962

    Watch from 4:01
    Rich Arabs Give Their Children Black Slaves As Birthday Gifts, black slaves kids carrying the books of their Arab master kids.

    And they would not have stopped it if the British, other Europeans and Americans had not forced them to.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_George_Gordon

    Moreover, considerable progress was made in the suppression of the slave trade.[104] Gordon wrote in a letter to his sister about the Africans living a “life of fear and misery”, but in spite of the “utter misery” of Equatoria that “I like this work”.[105] Gordon often personally intercepted slave convoys to arrest the slavers and break the chains of the slaves, but he found that the corrupt Egyptian bureaucrats usually sold the freed Africans back into slavery, and the expense of caring for thousands of freed slaves who were a long away from home burdensome.[106]

    During this period Gordon grew close to the Anti-Slavery Society, an evangelical Christian group based in London dedicated to ending slavery all over the world, and who regularly celebrated Gordon’s efforts to end slavery in the Sudan.[84] Urban wrote that: “Newspaper readers in Bolton or Beaminister had become enraged by stories about chained black children, cruelly abducted, being sold into slave markets…”, and Gordon’s anti-slavery efforts contributed to his image as a saintly man.[84]

    Gordon had come into conflict with the Egyptian governor of Khartoum and Sudan over his efforts to ban slavery.

    …snip….

    Governor-General of the Sudan[edit]
    As governor, Gordon faced a variety of challenges. Besides working to end slavery, Gordon carried out a series of reforms such as abolishing torture and public floggings where those opposed to the Egyptian state were flogged with a whip known as the kourbash made of buffalo hide

    Slavery was the basis of the Sudanese economy, and Gordon’s attempts to end the slave trade meant taking on very powerful vested interests, most notably Rahama Zobeir, known as the “King of the Slavers” as he was the richest and most powerful of all the slave traders in the entire Sudan. An insurrection had broken out in Darfur province led by associates of Zobeir and Gordon went to deal with it. The insurgents were numerous, and he saw that diplomacy had a better chance of success. On 2 September 1877, Gordon clad in the full gold-braided ceremonial blue uniform of the Governor-General of the Sudan and wearing the tarboush (the type of fez reserved for a pasha), accompanied by an interpreter and a few bashi-bazouks, rode unannounced into the enemy camp to discuss the situation.[115]

  76. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    I bash liars and haters regardless of whether they are black like you or white like the majority here. How the hell does that make me a hater?

    You on the other hand have embraced hate with a passion. What makes you look so pathetic is your slavish identification with racists who hate your race.

    If anyone needs to see a psychiatrist it’s you. You are obviously a seriously f**ked up lowlife.

    • Replies: @Malla
  77. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    Regarding slavery let us check this out

    From 00.00 minutes
    African kingdoms were major part in slavery. they did not stop slavery, Europeans did.
    The African soldier of the past proudly says they are a military people who sold slaves.
    at 06:52 African kings played a big role in the slave trade, many African kingdoms depended on slavery. Before Europeans landed in Africa, slavery was already in the system, it were slaves who worked for African kings.
    at 22:38 to 23:04 Ashanti made a lot of money on slavery
    at 30:04 Dahomey Kingdom was so warlike that other Africans had to make a venice like village in a lake to escape.
    at 31:30 the Dahohomey and neighbouring Kingdoms traded in slaves for ammunition. Dahomey themselves 1 million as slaves.
    the Dahomey even sacrificed their enemies, yes human sacrifice.
    At 33:20, the Dahomey were warlike, wars every year. Enemies were beheaded. Conquest and power and being greedy of power was considered a good thing for the King to have in Dahomey culture.
    At 34:50 Human sacrifice of enemy kings
    At 37:38 How much slavery was in the Dahomey kingdom
    At 45:15 a black guy of Benin said that the people sold into slavery were lucky or they would have been sacrificed, so slavery saved the lives of the blacks sold as slaves.

    At 14:40 to 16:20 minutes, slavery still going strong in the Sahara. It is traditional. Indeed the locals say, the Bela slaves love being slaves of the Tuareg. Wow. Lovely.

    Yeah rite, the West and Whites are uniquely evil. Yeah rite.
    If you think life was paradise before European colonialism, you have got to be thick.

  78. Respect says:
    @Malla

    Malla

    As I understand european gypsies came to Europe about five or six centuries ago , they were expelled from India . Do you know why they were expelled from India ? . Thanks

    • Replies: @Malla
  79. Anonymous[238] • Disclaimer says:
    @Stan d Mute

    We are looking at the current year equivalent of modern humans encountering Neanderthals except the differential may be even bigger.

    Current research on Neandertals suggests they were more intelligent and less violent than the species that gradually absorbed them.

    Just something to keep in mind, along with the general concept of not blatting your fool mouth in loud and resplendent ignorance.

  80. Anonymous[238] • Disclaimer says:
    @APilgrim

    If memory serves, the USA abortion death count since Roe-v-Wade is ~65M.

    Good, but not good enough.

    Dead Black Babies are statistically the relative highest percentage, & close to the top numerically.

    Better, but still not good enough.

    ZPG, and screw you dumbass religionists.

    • Replies: @Anon
  81. Anonymous[238] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe Wong

    The Americans are full of hate; they hate people better than they, they hate people different from they, they hate people resist their exploitation, they hate people have independent mind, they hate

    Then pack your bags and hit the road, Charlie Chan.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  82. Respect says:
    @Malla

    Godess Kali is going to punish India , for you unfaithfulness

    • Replies: @Malla
  83. Malla says:

    Hey check this out

    Slavery still strong in Yemen. Slavery of blacks.

    How rich is Yemen? Well it is one of the poorest countries in the world. but I thought slavery makes nations rich by modern standards? So why is Yemen poor even if has slaves?

    What is strange is that brainwashed commies like Jeo Wong or hateful losers like Bliss will waste their time hating Whitey, hating the West, trying to make Whitey feel bad because of slavery, but if they are so concerned about slavery, why do they not go to say Yemen and try to stop the practice? Try to do something good for a change and go to Yemen and do something good. Either you will free a couple of slaves and you guys will do good or you pussyboys will be shot at by some tough tribal Arabs. Both are good changes to this world. Look at that Englishmen Pasha Gordon, born an evil YT, he gave his life fighting slavery. But loser shits like Bliss sit behind their computers hating colonials like Gordon, when they are not even equal a man to Gordon’s fingernail.

  84. Malla says:
    @Respect

    As I understand european gypsies came to Europe about five or six centuries ago , they were expelled from India . Do you know why they were expelled from India ? . Thanks

    Hey I do not know much about this. Sorry. But in India there are gypsies too. Called Banjaras. So either these nomadic banjaras simply went West and became gypsies. Or they were escaping the Islamic conquests of India. This is the most I can say.

    • Replies: @Anon
  85. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    I bash liars and haters regardless of whether they are black like you or white like the majority here. How the hell does that make me a hater?

    You should bash yourself then. LOL.

    You on the other hand have embraced hate with a passion. What makes you look so pathetic is your slavish identification with racists who hate your race.

    I have embraced truth. Most people in the brown world are racists. I know this for sure. We are all Nazis. The average Arab is a Nazi, the average Indian is a Nazi. Hitler was just trying to make Europeans like us Asians to ensure their survival, trying to kill of the universalist nature of European thinking for the more tribal nature common in the Middle East and the Subcontinent and many other parts of the world.
    The fact that I am supporting a race different than mine because I believe they have been wronged makes me not a racist.

    If anyone needs to see a psychiatrist it’s you.

    No, not really.I am great. You are an extreme case. You need to be put in a mental hospital ward ASAP.

    You are obviously a seriously f**ked up lowlife.

    LOL I live a great life, got a great easy high paying job. Most people who know me say I am intelligent, kind person. Well educated. …..
    You are a hateful shit. You boil in hatred in your pathetic life.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  86. Malla says:
    @Respect

    Godess Kali is going to punish India , for you unfaithfulness

    Goddess Kali is angry with our stupidity.

  87. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    There were Caucasians in North Africa before Negroid blacks even existed. Hell they found Caucasian European skulls in Southen Africa, the Hofmeyr Skull!!! Even during this period we get no Negroid skulls yet.

    Whadda silly moron, getting all excited about something that proves the opposite of what he thinks:

    https://www.mpg.de/research/hofmeyr-skull-supports-out-of-africa-theory

    Hofmeyr-Skull supports the “Out of Africa”-Theory
    Dating of skull delivers the first fossil indicator that modern humans evolved in Africa

    The surprising similarity between a fossil skull from the southernmost tip of Africa and similarly ancient skulls from Europe is in agreement with the genetics-based “Out of Africa” theory, which predicts that humans like those that inhabited Eurasia in the Upper Paleolithic should be found in sub-Saharan Africa around 36,000 years ago. The skull from South Africa provides the first fossil evidence in support of this prediction.

    • Replies: @Malla
  88. APilgrim says:
    @Stan d Mute

    By the reckoning of Stan d Mute,

    Jesus of Nazareth was the biggest dupe of all human history.

    Moses was a ‘desert rat’.

    Neanderthals had low IQs.

  89. Respect says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Why Holland does not repatriate the boers ?? , or Merkel . Central Europe is full of muslims , and you don`t repatriate boers ?

  90. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    So?
    Bengalis range in skin colour from light brown to extremely dark brown. But to a Northern Euro White person even a light brown Caucasoid subcontinental may seem as black. So they called the part of the city where Bengalis lived as blacktown. Makes perfect logical sense to me. To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    Most Hindus avoid contact with all non Hindus. Europeans, Africans, East Asians you name it. They are called Mleccha, or barbarians. So Europeans were not unique in this.

    What are you exactly trying to prove here? That I consider myself a wannabe White? You can go through all my comments on Unz, NOWHERE do I show this sentiment.
    Were the Europeans who took the side of blacks in their abolition of slavery called wannabe blacks?
    What is wrong with you head? Why don’t you pour some water on it? It might increase your IQ a bit, maybe to 32.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Bliss
    , @Stan d Mute
  91. peterAUS says:
    @republic

    …. the betrayal by the Boer establishment- the Boer politicians and church leaders and big businessmen..

    Don’t say……

    Also, sounds familiar.

    Ah, yes, but this time, and PLACE, it will be different.
    The HOPE.

  92. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    My God, I have come across a lot of idiots on this website. You top them all. What was the gist of my post?
    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans. Thousands of years before the bantu black was even formed, hell even before the Koi San were formed, there were Caucasian people living in Africa.
    Go through that video again. You did not understand it as you have, what we call in India, ‘mund buddhi’. Basically you are thick.

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
    , @Bliss
  93. peterAUS says:
    @TG

    …They opened the door to massive immigration from poorer parts of Africa, in order to keep wages low and profits high. It worked.

    and

    But we can’t talk about how governments forcing population increases against the will of the general public drives wages down… no, that is taboo.

    Yup.

  94. Malla says:
    @Malla

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks the Arabs call themselves as White. It is all relative.

  95. Bliss says:
    @Bliss

    So British apartheid was practiced in India more than a century before it was officially introduced in South Africa.

    Btw, many Indians and Malays were also shipped to South Africa as slaves. And after slavery was abolished in the 19th century, as indentured servants:

    https://mediadiversified.org/2016/05/18/where-were-south-africas-slaves-from/

    In the early years, 80% of slaves to South Africa came from India (this included Sri Lanka). Slaves would continue to be brought from India, but over the years other regions of the world also gained importance.

    Records indicate slaves as also originating from West and Central Africa, with places of origin often collectively referred to as the Guinea coast, but specifically including the Cape Verde Islands, Burkina Faso, Benin, Congo, Angola, and also Zanzibar and Ethiopia (Abyssinia).

    Outside of Africa slaves were from: Siam (Thailand), Persia (Iran), Arabia (north Africa and the Arabian Peninsula), Brazil, Burma, China, Japan, Borneo, Timor and Vietnam, amongst other origins. There are also mentions of Tagal, possibly pointing to Filipinos who spoke Tagalog.

    So slaves from as far away as China, Japan, Vietnam and Philippines also ended up in European colonies in Africa. Later of course, after slavery was abolished and replaced by indentured servitude, it was overwhelmingly asians (Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos etc) who were imported to white colonies to do the work previously done by slaves.

  96. Joe Wong says:
    @Anonymous

    Can’t you see we are building a new world in China? And hopefully it will be the sample for others to follow to form a new world order. But the Anglo and their mentally colonized lackeys like Indian and unrepentant war criminal Japanese won’t let it happen, otherwise their ugly past will not only be addressed but also be criticized. Perhaps George Bush, Dick Cheney, Barak Obama, and Tony Blair should be summoned to the ICC to be questioned as the first batch?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  97. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    Many of those cathedrals were built before colonialism even began

    This is the Lincoln Cathedral in Lincoln, England. Building commenced in 1072 and continued in several phases throughout the medieval period. It was the tallest building in the world for 238 years (1311–1549). It was the first building in the world taller than the Great Pyramid of Giza. But even then it was not the largest cathedral in England, York Cathedral was even larger.
    This was built before colonialism even began. And there are loads of such cathedrals in Europe before 1600.

    Also Haiti, the poor shithole carribean country too was a colonial power. After genociding the French Whites on that island (except a few Germans and Poles) they colonized the Dominican Republic. The Dominican Republic celebrates their independence day from Haiti. So why is Haiti with its colonial history not rich?

    https://www.officeholidays.com/countries/dominican_republic/independence-day.php

    This public holiday is always celebrated on 27 February.
    It is the Dominican Republic’s National Day and it commemorates independence from Haiti in 1844.

    • Replies: @Peasant
  98. Joe Wong says:
    @Malla

    Why do you hate commies so much? Is it because they have different minds than yours? Or the communism make your way of life, ‘capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism’ appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?

    • Replies: @Malla
  99. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    To Northern Europeans even North Africans and Arabs are black but compared to subsaharan blacks they call themselves as White. It is all relative.

    It was only the natives of India, regardless of caste, who lived in Black Town, Calcutta. The non-European MENA types, the mixed race Anglo-Indians, the Chinese etc lived in between Black Town and White Town. In South Africa Indians were originally lumped with Black Africans until the London-educated lawyer Gandhi agitated for separation from african “kaffirs”.

    Indians are called blacks even by the dark skinned Malays of Southeast Asia. In Chinese Buddhist scripture Bodhidharma, the founder of the Chan sect (Zen in Japan) is described as “the black faced bhikshu”. Here’s Saint Francis Xavier describing the Brahmins of India:

    https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543xavier1.asp

    the Indians being black themselves, consider their own color the best, they believe that their gods are black. On this account the great majority of their idols are as black as black can be

    • Replies: @Malla
  100. Anonymous[218] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe Wong

    Can’t you see we are building a new world in China? And hopefully it will be the sample for others to follow to form a new world order.

    Can I see it? Yes, I can. And it looks very much like a revised, revitalized, newly-disguised variation of the soul-destroying feudalism that was “old China”. Which means it’s not all that much different from the foully-corrupt monstrosity that is the USA. Call it 30 years away?

    The hugely overpopulated world that is now on the horizon will be a horror-show for humanity like no other. China ain’t no Camelot — countries that are run by oligarchs paying people $1 an hour for 12-hour work-days are not shining examples of anything but monstrous inhumanity. But, like I said, not really much different from the USA.

    There are some very bad people in the world, and they need hanging, ASAP. The media — the most disgusting component of the show — keeps the masses deceived. All should hang — government, oligarchs, media.

    Perhaps George Bush, Dick Cheney, Barak Obama, and Tony Blair should be summoned to the ICC to be questioned as the first batch?

    You tie their hands, I’ll throw the trapdoor release.

  101. Malla says:

    So British apartheid was practiced in India more than a century before it was officially introduced in South Africa.

    The British did not practice apartheid in South Africa, you stupid mund buddhi monkey, Apartheid was mostly an Afrikanner thing.

    http://www.williamdalrymple.uk.com/books/white-mughals

    Apartheid in India? Read the book White Mughals you hateful monkey, 30% or early colonial Europeans in India married Indian women. There were several cases of Europeans going native, wearing Indian cloths, listening to Indian music, living like Indians during the early colonial period. Of Europeans converting to Islam and becoming scholars of Islam, of Europeans living like Hindus (Hindoo Stuart). What apartheid are you babbling about? Of East India Company men sitting with Hindu Pundits and Islamic Scholars and discussing astronomy, philosophy, poetry….

    Also in many Indian armies like the Marathas, Tipu Sultan, there were loads of European mercenaries mostly in the artillery division. What apartheid?

    Hey talking of slavery, why are you not in Yemen yet.

    • Replies: @Malla
  102. @Malla

    Pro tip: Ron has gifted us with an “ignore commenter” feature.

    • Replies: @Malla
  103. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    Oh, you are an afrocentrist.
    If we are black like Africans, why did Idi Amin kick us out of Uganda?

    Why did that gorilla steal all the wealth we had created with hard work?

    Indians vary in skin colour from light brown to even White to jet black.

    From Dark brown

    to light brown

    What are you exactly trying to prove?

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Bliss
    , @Joe Wong
  104. Malla says:
    @Stan d Mute

    I would like to take this idiot on. But thanks for the tip bud.

  105. @Bragadocious

    At this stage Britain is richly deserving of their fate.

  106. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    Or the communism make your way of life, ‘capitalism which is in fact a caste feudalism’ appear selfish, greedy, violent, uncompassionate, and, oh well damn ugly?

    Communism is not the enemy of Capitalism. It is a system financed and supported by big banking elites because in this system the government gets maximum power over the people, something the elites like and want to implement on the entire world. You do not own anything yourself, you do not own your own house, you do not own your own cloths. You are basically not human but a slave automon.
    I am all for socialism. Not Communism.
    Besides that, Communists are experts in brainwashing.
    Check out this book. Maybe some of these techniques have been used on you.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/03/04/communism-in-romania-the-anti-humans-by-dumitru-bacu/

    http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pdf_books/antihumans.pdf

    The Anti-Humans: Student Re-education in Romanian Prisons by Dumitru Bacu
    Those who do this to others are not really humans.

    The Black Book of Communism

    https://archive.org/download/TheBlackBookofCommunism10/the-black-book-of-communism-jean-louis-margolin-1999-communism.pdf

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    , @Malla
  107. Malla says:
    @Malla

    In the late 18th Century, when Delhi was being plagued by invaders, Lucknow’s fortunes were on the rise under the Nawabs of Awadh, a relatively new dynasty. Nawab means a kind of Duke, semi independent aristocrat in India. The Nawabs often imitated Mughal practices to gain legitimacy. The poet Mir Muhammad Taqi who came to Lucknow as a refugee from Delhi in 1782. Although Mir was welcomed by the Nawab of Awadh, who even paid for his journey from Delhi, the poet was never able to reconcile himself to exile from the ravaged Mughal capital. Mir’s predecessor at the Lucknow Court had been the poet Sauda, known for his caustic wit and satires on contemporary events. Sauda was patronised by the Nawab Shuja-ud-daula and his successor Asaf-ud-daula, and it was through this connection that the poet met Richard Johnson, the British Assistant Resident who is supposed to have known Urdu and who enjoyed its poetry. At the very end of his life, Sauda presented Johnson with a manuscript of his collected verse, as a mark of high honour, a graceful tribute across cultural boundaries.

    During the 1780s, there was a particular interest in the translations of the great Hindu epics, which were promoted by the Sanskrit scholar Sir William Jones, who founded the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Another connoisseur in Lucknow was Major General Claude Martin, whose library contained a number of important works including Seir Mutaquerin; The Code of Gentoo [Hindu] Laws, from a Persian translation from the original Sanskrit; The Hitopadesa, Fables and Proverbs from the Sanskrit, and “Sacontala” or the Fatal Ring, translated from the original Sanskrit and Prakrit.

    Descriptions by visiting foreigners present delightful glimpses of cultural exchange in the tolerant period of late 18th Century Lucknow. Mrs. Elizabeth Plowden entertains the Nawab at dinner with a number of English songs. The Mughal prince, Mir Sulaiman Shikuh, who was Insha’s patron, is heard reading in English a poem translated from the Persian and the English artist Ozias Humphrey sees Asaf-ud-daula teaching his young son to write Arabic and Persian words.

    What kind of Apartheid is this?

  108. Malla says:

    And let us check out Amy Wilson Carmichael.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Carmichael

    Amy Wilson Carmichael (16 December 1867 – 18 January 1951) was a Protestant Christian missionary in India, who opened an orphanage and founded a mission in Dohnavur. She served in India for 55 years without furlough and wrote many books about the missionary work there.

    Carmichael’s fellowship transformed Dohnavur into a sanctuary for over one thousand children who would otherwise have faced a bleak future.[4] Carmichael often said that her Ministry of rescuing temple children started with a girl named Preena. Having become a temple servant against her wishes, Preena managed to escape. Amy Carmichael provided her shelter and withstood the threats of those who insisted that the girl be returned either to the temple directly to continue her sexual assignments, or to her family for more indirect return to the temple. The number of such incidents soon grew, thus beginning Amy Carmichael’s new Ministry.[5] When the children were asked what drew them to Amy, they most often replied “It was love. Amma (They’re refferring to Amy as their mother; Amma means mother) loved us.”[6]

    Respecting Indian culture, members of the organization wore Indian dress and gave the rescued children Indian names. Carmichael herself dressed in Indian clothes, dyed her skin with dark coffee, and often traveled long distances on India’s hot, dusty roads to save just one child from suffering.

    In 1912 Queen Mary recognized the missionary’s work, and helped fund a hospital at Dohnavur.[7] By 1913, the Dohnavur Fellowship was serving 130 girls. In 1918, Dohnavur added a home for young boys, many born to the former temple prostitutes. Meanwhile, in 1916 Carmichael formed a Protestant religious order called Sisters of the Common Life.

    What apartheid? And there were many like her. How many black Africans have done something like this for us?

    • Replies: @Lockean Proviso
  109. Joe Wong says:
    @Malla

    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA cold war version of Communism. Communism is about producers having bigger say about the distribution of what they produced and the equality of the society.

    So far communism has been implemented badly due to the adverse circumstances and poor quality of the participants. You should not put out verdict too early because of bad precedents unless you are brain washed by other ideology and does not have the capacity of open mindedness. This also apply to democracy, though democracy has been hijacked by the Western imperialists as a facade to cover their crimes, but given the right condition, democracy can be beneficial to be human beings just like communism.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  110. DeriKuk says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “These wars were extremely one sided, repeater rifles against javelins etc.”

    I don’t think there were “repeater” muskets – let alone rifles – before the 1860s… which by my reckoning comes a few years after 1652. Please pay attention to these little details before you besmirch you own arguments in the future.

    • Agree: Realist
  111. Truth says:
    @Malla

    I’m glad you didn’t put pictures of Hijras up again, Bro, I just ate; except the last one.

    • Replies: @Malla
  112. Peasant says:
    @Malla

    Kind sir,

    I put you forward for commenter of the month. I have never seen so many informative comments from one commenter in such a short period of time.

    Bravo!

    • Replies: @Malla
  113. bj says:
    @Bill Holdon

    This guy is a more typical Afrikaner.

    Your Security in South Africa | Craig Roseveare

  114. Malla says:
    @Peasant

    Thank you for your kind words. I am glad I am getting these facts out to a larger audience.

  115. Malla says:
    @Truth

    Thanks. After that video you showed me about hijras (transgender) in Bollywood, I have become a bit careful. Indeed since that time onwards, I look at every celebrity with a critical eye. Glad I did not cause you to throw up.

  116. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    Your knowledge about communism is the CIA

    You will be surprised to know how much the CIA (and the OSS before them) has actually helped in spreading communism around the world.
    The USA helped create the People’s Republic of China. Wall Street bankers were behind Lenin and his gang. The USA also brought Castro to power in Cuba.
    This whole thing is a big scam, a game, a kabuki play. There is no Communism vs Capitalism. Both are arms of the same monster.

    Western imperialists

    There are no Western imperialists. There are Zionist imperialists.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  117. bj says:

    Is South Africa Headed For Civil War? | Steve Hofmeyr and Stefan Molyneux

  118. bj says:

    Beyond Black and White: A breakdown of different race groups in SA

    http://historyreviewed.com/?p=186

  119. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    Even Democracy is starting to look more and more like a scam. I guess Plato said (got this from a Jay Dyer video) that Democracy is a scam, there is always an oligarchy behind the scenes. It just gets the people excited more for national causes including wars for the oligarchs.

  120. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    “Hitler was just trying to make Europeans like us Asians to ensure their survival,…”

    For someone so well informed and Knowledgeable maybe you should be a little bit more skeptical about Hitler.

    I don’t need to “prove” it, because I ‘m sure you know where the money that put Hitler into power came from , where the money that saved the nazi party in the 30′s came from.

    Hitler was a great admirer of the British empire and you also know who we gave the world that empire.

    I’m trying to suggest that we have enough evidence to suggest that Hitler was a poodle in the hands of those who gave us the British empire, the I and II WW etc…

    The total destruction of Germany couldn’t have been achieved with just a defeat by an external enemy.

    And Hitler and lots of high ranking nazis looked like members of the tribe.

    of course , I might be completely wrong , but anyway your admiration for the man is, at best, naive.

    • Replies: @Malla
  121. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    Almost all Indians range from jet black to dark brown. ASI is black and every Indian has it. Most Indians are majority ASI.

    The most famous Indian of modern times, Gandhi, was stereotypically Indian:

    The most famous female Indian saint of recent times with the Father of indian rocketry and President of India:

    [MORE]

    The founder of the Hare Krishna movement:

    The founder of the Transcendental Meditation (TM) movement:

    Brahmin priests:

    https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/sri-vadapathira-kaliamman-hindu-temple-hindu-brahmin-priests-picture-id929269750

    Brahmin Prime Minister:

    India’s best runner:

    India’s top music composer:

    • Replies: @Malla
  122. @jilles dykstra

    Yeah right: I never saw my relative as a racist, yet he was of the opinion that ‘the blacks are completely useless’.
    In my opinion just a statement of fact…….. Yeah, Just NAZI = hateful=bigot

  123. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    That the people who left Africa had nothing to do with today’s black people or their ancestors. They already had skull structures like Europeans.

    You drooling retard, modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent. What kind of an utterly clueless idiot are you to claim they had nothing in common?

    All humans in Africa and outside Africa have African human ancestors. Therefore alll races of mankind can be traced back to africans. Why is it such an exciting surprise for you to learn that Europeans are descended from humans in the Deep South of Africa? The Hofmeyr skull just confirms what genetics already revealed.

    Btw, the Hofmeyr skull predates european Cheddar man by over 25,000 years. Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot…

  124. Respect says:

    And Merkelita von Siria could not accept afrikaner refugees ? , ah , no , their are white .

  125. Binyamin says:

    Mercer accurately highlights some of the odious practices of apartheid however, the article is historically inaccurate. The British did not invent Apartheid. Yes, there was widespread racial discrimination in South Africa prior to 1948 before the National party (the party of apartheid) came to power. But this was the case in all corners of the then British Empire, in Africa, India and elsewhere.
    During the second world war many National Party stalwarts such as John Vorster were open sympathizers of Nazi Germany and were interned by the then South African Government of General Smuts.
    The reason why the apartheid policies of the National Party which were codified and put in place between 1948 and 1950 caused unique worldwide opprobrium was because after the horrors of the second world war, the idea of racial supremacy was widely and rightly completely discredited. It is worth pointing out that the Apartheid government in South Africa were not white nationalists, they were white supremacists. Their worldview was based on the premise that the European race was superior to all other races, a mindset utterly unacceptable to the rest of the world especially since by now the world had known what racial supremacist ideology leads to, mainly the horrors of Nazi Germany.
    Moreover, in Mercer’s article there is a lot of ‘whataboutery’- what about the Americans and their supposed crimes and blah, blah, blah. I thought she was writing about her homeland and apartheid? One sometimes wonders if Mercer hates America so much why did she take up US citizenship? It has off course nothing to do with the generous welfare benefits US citizens often get, especially in their old age such as Medicare.

    • Replies: @bj
  126. Realist says:
    @The Alarmist

    ……war on a certain class of people who won’t go quietly into the dark night.

    At least some won’t.

  127. Them Guys says:
    @Malla

    Maybe Poster “Truth” didn’t learn anything as he/she stated….However, what I did learn is that I and many others who claim that…Jews and Negroes are The two worst possible Curses upon European White folks, that could ever be a curse. It took me until I was about age of 50 yrs old, when then 15 yrs ago, I first became really Jewised Up and awake fully about Jews. So until that age 50 era, I was a firm believer that, NOTHING and NOBODY Else is, nor could ever be worse than Blacks.

    That all changed once I got Jewised Up, and now I admit I was very wrong about Blacks…I Now know, and without any doubt, that Blacks are slightly less of a massive major Curse upon Whites…If I had to rate it by assigning a number, say a 10 means absolute worst curse on Whites….Then, Jews get rated at, 15+ and Blacks at a lower number rate of just, 14.5 or, 1/2 point below the curse of Jews on Whiteys.

    These great informative reply posts by Malla, have vindicated me in proving me correct as can be. The Two main, major, Massive Curses against European Whites is and has been….Jews#1 and African Savage Blacks at #2…But a Very Close #2…..So close I prefer to avoid Both groups like the major Plague they both have well proven themselves to be.

    If one were to compare America to a Human body, to describe its many problems…It would look like a very sickly and diseased Human Body, with Scab covered deep sores all over its body. And if you were to carefully peel back a scab, any and every scab from the many sores. And peered into the poison puss filling the sore spot, it would be as if, every sore was a negro, and beneath every scab covering, deep within that poison puss, stood a tiny Jew with his snarling evil face staring back up at you. The scab covered sores are the visible problems aka negros, while the real poison aka the puss inside is Jewish. Deeply well hidden and only revealed by peeling away the scab he hides under, and even then one must possess a very keen vision eye sight or use a microscope to view him.

    These postings Malla Posted up also vindicate, a website owner guy named, Bro. Kapner at, realjewnews dot com, when he has said many times that, No major problem such as Americas Black problems, can ever get fixed unless Americans first deal with it’s massive, Jew problems. He advises a total boot out same as 109 prior nations have had to do, if America ever wishes to end its problems, and return to when it was a great and swell nation and peoples again. Bro Kapner is correct, and these posts on Africans and Tribal jungle blacks….Well prove it so.

    • Replies: @Malla
  128. TheJester says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Allowing them [Bantu Africans] in Western Civilization will be the downfall of all civilization. In a thousand years, Earth will resemble itself from 30,000 or more years ago and solely due to fecundity of a Stone Age population we were too dumb and propagandized to sequester. Thanks Booble Thumpers! Your Armageddon is real, it’s African, and it’s of your own doing.

    Well said, Stan d Mute.

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia. (Affirmative action jobs must pay well. I talking about a social phenomenon in some of the richest counties in the United States.) These marriages make sense in a way. Given the alternative, I can imagine what transpires over morning coffee between a White feminist who hates White men and one of the White men she hates.

    On the other hand, White feminists who hate White men and Black power males who hate White men have a lot in common. Their back-and-forth over morning coffee must provide both of them a cathartic effect as they vent their anger against a common enemy.

    However, I’m wondering if many of these White feminists will become disillusioned when Black male domestic violence, as happened to Rachel Dolezal, starts to rear its ugly head. There is also the question of whether shared anger is a viable basis for a stable marriage.

    Although somewhat dated, a 2000 NYT article reports that Blacks commit domestic violence at almost triple the rate of Whites.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/18/us/study-shows-a-racial-divide-in-domestic-violence-cases.html

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Them Guys
  129. @Bliss

    Well, you’ve got the Out of Africa dogma down pat. You do realise Cheddar Man’s pigmentation is hypothesis.

    What do you make of the 9.5 million year old teeth they found in Germany, which are similar to African Lucy’s but predate hers by a couple million years?

  130. Joe Wong says:
    @Malla

    Indian nut, typical ‘god-fearing’ morally defunct evil American exceptionalist, gang of unrepentant war criminal Jap and holocaust denier.

  131. Joe Wong says:
    @Malla

    These are Photoshop doctored photos; Indians are either jet black or dark brown.

    • Replies: @Malla
  132. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    We Indians are a mix race of Caucasians and black aborigines and even East Asians upto a small extent. So obviously you will get massive variation in looks amongst Indian subcontinentals. They are all Indians but you are cherry picking. Indians are a mixture of ASI and ANI. But what about these Indians? ‘

    Arun Jaitley, Finance Minister of the Government India

    Ashok Gajapathi Raju, Minister of Civil Aviation, Government of India

    L.K. Advani, Ex Home Minister of India

    Pranab Mukherjee, Ex President of the Republic of India

    Ravi Shashtri, Indian Cricketer

    Ajit Agarkar, Indian Cricketer

    There are even Indian people with afro hair tho most Indians have straight or wavy hair

    Satya Sai Baba, conman, homosexual pervert

    The Indians you have posted and the ones I have posted are all Indians. But even the light brown Indians, I have posted above would have looked as blacks to Northern Europeans.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  133. Che Guava says:
    @Malla

    The old (17th century) England and Wales Bill of Rights, and its Scottish equivalent, did include the right of citizens to bear arms.

    Much of the U.S. constitution and Bill of Rights is based on those documents (probably more the former (England and Wales)), so they are worth reading if you have an interest in such things. I do.

    However, the Brit. legal-political classes decided to pretend that those laws did not exist at some stage, I think, but not sure, early in the last century, maybe earlier. They have never been rescinded.

    The sequence of how that happened would make a really good topic for a doctoral thesis in history.

    From my reading, such deep thought is not well-regarded in the west of now, Intersectional Thoughts on the Founders, On the Non-Intersectionality of the Founders, or some other such rubbish would be more likely to be a hit.

    There must be some places that are not like that?

    Also, looking at both the England-Wales and Scotland bills, and their connection to the founding principles of the U.S.A., in depth, at least worth a master’s thesis.

    • Replies: @Malla
  134. bj says:

    The head of Genocide Watch, Dr. Gregory Stanton in 2012 conducted a study in South Africa and came to an incredible conclusion: “There is a coordinated campaign of genocide being conducted against white farmers.” Many of the Whites surrendered their guns when the African National Congress (ANC) government passed gun laws to confiscate the farmers’ weapons.

    Genocide Watch said, “Disarmament of a targeted group is one of the surest early warning signs of future genocidal killings.”

    https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/30/south-africa-white-farms-white-farmers/

  135. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    For someone so well informed and Knowledgeable maybe you should be a little bit more skeptical about Hitler.

    Yes I have heard about theories that the NSDAP was financed by bankers and the like. Also that Hitler was a Rothschild.
    And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.

    But on the other hand he and his party were rare in openly exposing the whole globalist conspiracy. He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. Worth noting is that Mussolini, Salazar (Portugal) and Franco of Spain are not reviled as much. Of course the lefties and the globalists hate them too but the Reich gets the most hatred from Hollywood (the propaganda arm of the elites). His economic policy was a good mix of free market economics and socialism and thus was a an alternative to the globalist elite controlled Communism and Corporate Capitalism.

    There is a video named “Dennis Wise- Claims of Hitler being controlled opposition 5-28-17″ which debunks many of those claims. It is on youtube but obviously there are many restrictions put on it.

    Hitler was a great admirer of the British empire and you also know who we gave the world that empire.

    Because he thought that the Empire was a bulwark against Communism. But obviously he did not realize that the banking elites in London have been one of the biggest pushers of Communism in the world. Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire.

    And Hitler and lots of high ranking nazis looked like members of the tribe.

    Yes true. There are a few suspicious things about the regime.

    of course , I might be completely wrong , but anyway your admiration for the man is, at best, naive.

    Maybe you are right, I understand what you mean. But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich. German workers had a very high standard of living, the 6 million unemployment problem was solved with new public works jobs and the destruction heaped on Germany during the Weimar period, economic as well as social were all repaired during his short reign.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  136. Malla says:
    @Joe Wong

    Thank you for the compliments.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  137. Malla says:
    @TheJester

    White professional women marrying Blacks is now epidemic in Northern Virginia.

    And who is behind this phenomenon?

    Who’s behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  138. bj says:
    @Binyamin

    the idea of racial supremacy was widely and rightly completely discredited. It is worth pointing out that the Apartheid government in South Africa were not white nationalists, they were white supremacists. Their worldview was based on the premise that the European race was superior to all other races, a mindset utterly unacceptable to the rest of the world especially since by now the world had known what racial supremacist ideology leads to, mainly the horrors of Nazi Germany.

    Racial supremacy is the attitude of Jews world wide and the state policy of the apartheid state of Israel. Your conclusion that racial supremacy leads to the horrors of Nazi Germany is playing out in Israel, as the Jewish State of Israel massacres the Palestinians in slow genocide.

    Your words are the lies and hypocrisy of a tribal cult preying on normal humanity for thousands of years. The Afrikaners know the Jews instigated the Boer War to steal the mineral wealth of South Africa and you have the nerve to call the Afrikaners supremacists!

    From Yahweh to Zion by Laurent Guyénot (Author), Kevin Barrett (Translator)

    https://www.amazon.com/Yahweh-Zion-Laurent-Guy%C3%A9not-ebook/dp/B0798DF7K1

    And for your edification….The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed

    https://controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm

    • Replies: @Malla
  139. Peasant says:
    @Bliss

    ‘Does Cheddar man look like today’s Europeans to you? Frickin idiot’

    Cheddar man had been reconstructed earlier with white coloured skin. This reconstruction was just a politically correct version. The scientist who did the reconstruction is on record as saying nobody knows if he had dark skin or not.

    The funniest part is that skin colour is not race. There are many southern dravidian Indians darker than many Africans but who look down on them beacuse of Africans primitive features eg prognathism, smaller head size, low foreheads etc and also primitive behaviours eg violence.

    You see you use an example of Cheddar man to point out how African ancient Europeans were, not realsiing that Cheddar man’s bone structure, facial composition and hairline are all caucasian. You would never maintain the middle easterners are sub saharan blacks and yet you think prehistoric Europeans were. They are both caucosoid- which most sub saharan blacks (the pure ones anyway-in prehistoric times there was substantial in migration of middle eastern dna into the horn of Africa area which is why there are generally more gracile than southern and west African blacks) are not.

    By the way cheddar man has living re
    latives in modern Britain:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5364983/amp/Retired-history-teacher-believes-looks-like-Cheddar-Man.html

    Cheddar man White (and in black photo clearly Caucasian):

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5453665/amp/Was-Cheddar-man-white-all.html

    African Albinos (skin colour is not race):

    https://www.cwporter.com/africanalb.htm

    My final comment:

    http://nelson-haha.api-meal.eu/

    p.s I saw a comment recently that blacks do not understand what race is and that they think it is just skin colour. They are so dumb as to have taken to heart the liberal mantra that we should not judge people on the colour of thier skin. As if skin colour was not an indication of less desirable traits rather than a bad trait itself (although blacks tend to dislike it and spend alot of money on lightening creams). Im glad I saw your comments as it reconfirmed what I already knew. Lol.

    • Replies: @Malla
  140. Malla says:
    @Che Guava

    Wow, thank you for this information. British people need to really look this up, if these laws still stand, start arming themselves. I am aware that in the pre American Revolution period, the colonials had the right to free speech as well as the right to bear arms.

  141. Malla says:
    @Them Guys

    I am glad, my posts were of help.

  142. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    modern Africans and the Africans who left Africa have the same ancestors from the same continent.

    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc… more than 150000 years ago at the least. Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures. Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them. The OOA migrants left Africa 80,000 years ago and even 40,000 years ago there was a back migration of Caucasians into Africa and for the next 32,000 years there were no Negroids around. The Negroid race was not even formed yet.
    Ancestors of Negroids have absorbed genes from archaic primitive populations as late as 150,000 years ago and those genes are not found in Out of Africa (OOA) populations.The OOA populations left 80,000 years ago but there is no history of these genes absorbed by Negroids, 150,000 years ago. How is that possible? Obviously the two populations (OOA populations and ancestors of Negroids/Khoi Sans etc..) had separated ATLEAST 150,000 years ago. Even unique Khoi San genes are not found in OOA populations.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
    , @Bliss
  143. Che Guava says:
    @Malla

    Hey Malla.

    Like your many comments that are annoying others here, cheers for that.

    … but you seem to like cricket. As do I. I wish that Japan had adopted cricket instead of baseball, but, instead, a third-tier nation in cricket. Still, able to defeat the U.S.A. in baseball, quite often.

    So, that is fun to see.

    Nothing is beating test cricket as a sport that approaches chess in complexity at times.

    I tell friends ‘cricket is more interesting, if only we adopted it’, but the baseball cult is very strong, during summer, the Koushien, literally ‘child pressing park’ is on TV everywhere. It is the high-school championships.

    They go on to the commercial teams, then, one to three a year, to the U.S.A.

    I am much liking their spirit, but am still preferring cricket as an interesting game.

    • Replies: @Malla
  144. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    Who’s behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
    A must watch video.

    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They’ve created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.

    Rather than a vast Jewish conspiracy to promote race-mixing, the Jews have actually enforced a sort of Jim Crow media. For example, Barack Obama was conceived in 1960. But in 1960 a black man and a white woman couldn’t be in the same room together on television. The so-called Jewish media has always lagged far behind the real world in terms of interracial couplings.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Bliss
  145. Malla says:
    @Che Guava

    Like your many comments that are annoying others here, cheers for that.

    Thanks bud. What is more fun is reading their frustrated responses.

    Yes, very few countries play cricket. The main cricketing countries are England, West Indies, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
    It would have been great of Japan and the USA would have played cricket too. Cricket is a great game, the complexity turns off newcomers but once you get a hang of it, you get addicted.
    However we are seeing Kenya, Afghanistan, Netherlands, Scotland etc…coming up lately and may become full fledged cricket playing countries in the future.
    A lot of Indians are becoming curious about baseball lately.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  146. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    “And there are some events during WW2 which did raise my suspicion. Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.”

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.

    ” He and his government have been the most reviled by the mass media. ”

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler – , everyone knows that Russia isn’t an independent country and that Russia is controlled by the same force that controls USA, GB, France etc…Putin best friend is the the king of Israel.
    Maybe in the 30′s it was the same. Except that the mafia state didn’t exist at the time

    ” Later in life he started supporting revolutionary leaders like Nataji Subhash Chandra Bose against the British Empire”.

    Later in life ? Can you give a date ?

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.

    Why ? Again , because Hitler had great admiration for the British empire and because like his “friend” – the great war criminal Churchill – he believed that Indians were inferiors and they needed a white master.

    Your admiration for the man is really bizarre…Because I don’t think you believe that you belong to an inferior race. Do you ?

    Do you also admire that great war criminal and the greatest English hero of all time – Sir Winston Churchill , and who despised Indians ?

    “But there is not denying that many of the policies regarding economics and others were very good in the Third Reich.”

    No doubt about that…But that isn’t reason for you or anyone else to consider the guy as a kind of hero because he tried to save the white race or he fought for the white race.

    As usual, follow the money. If you follow the money, you will understand that Hitler /Nazi Party had a master.

    In spite of Hollywood movies, there was no doubt that Germany was condemned to lose that war.

    The enemy was inside Germany and some high ranking Nazis were working for Germany’s defeat.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @jilles dykstra
  147. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures. Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins. A few minutes of googling exposes his deceit:

    Pranab Mukherjee with his wife:

    Amit Agarkar, on the right:

    Sathya Sai Baba:

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
  148. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    For your Jewish masters you guys are just weapons to be used against Whitey. When a major race war takes place, the blackie will be getting bashed by Whitey while the remote controllers of blacky, the Jooie will run scot free.

    The Tall Israeli That Runs The Rap Industry

    Dr. E. Michael Jones on the Black/Jewish Alliance and Destabilization

    Minister Louis Farrakhan – Black Entertainers Under Jewish Remote Control

    Jewish Financed Gangster Rap Music is Psychological Warfare

    Malcolm X on Jews

    For your Jewish massas you guys are just mere tools. On the slave ships the Jews were the massas, they are still your massas. Black people never left no plantation. When you came to America from Nigeria, you entered a plantation. Come to think about it, the whole world is a plantation it seems.

  149. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    Yes but those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc… more than 150000 years ago at the least.

    You’re a scientifically illiterate buffoon. There is no “branching away” in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.

    Those Africans who left for Eurasia did not look like black bantus but already had Caucasian facial structures.

    You have no idea what they looked like. What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification. There are no “Caucasian facial structures” that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa. Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.

    Bantu blacks start appearing only 8000 years ago, Khoi San little before them.

    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations. But, again, that doesn’t indicate discrete differentiation because those are superficial traits that are modulated by relatively few genes.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Truth
  150. Bliss says:
    @Okechukwu

    Now the toadying, sycophantic hindu Uncle Tom is concerned about race mixing on American television.

    This silly slave is seriously screwed up. You really have to wonder what he sees when he looks in the mirror. It’s hilarious to see a non-white so emotionally invested in Nazi race fantasies.

    Big hint, Malla, your white masters are the greatest race mixers the world has ever seen. They’ve created entire classes and sub-classes of races with their race-mixing, usually via forcible rape.

    Exactly. And it continues to this day. Including among the most vocal leaders of the racist alt-right such as Reed, Derbyshire, Anglin et al. Many of the alt-right members of this forum are posting from Japan, Philippines, China, Thailand, Mexico etc where they went to pursue their sexual fetish for non-white women.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  151. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    those Africans who left Africa had branched away from the ancestors of bantus/Khoi Sans etc

    The idiot still doesn’t get it. Where the hell did you learn the absurd idea that a branch has “nothing to do” with what it branched away from?

    You should stick to regurgitating the 19th century racial pseudoscience that you learned at Stormfront. That clearly impresses the racist trash here, and gets you off too.

    • Replies: @Malla
  152. Okechukwu says:
    @Bliss

    Exactly. And it continues to this day. Including among the most vocal leaders of the racist alt-right such as Reed, Derbyshire, Anglin et al. Many of the alt-right members of this forum are posting from Japan, Philippines, China, Thailand, Mexico etc where they went to pursue their sexual fetish for non-white women.

    Yep. And all the interracial porn that floods the world is there to satiate those fetishes. Whites are virtually the only consumers of that stuff. The market was created for them and they’re the ones that keep it lucrative.

    • Replies: @Bombercommand
  153. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    My god!!! Really? Nordicist? Really? You need to go and get your head checked. You have some mental issues? The pictures I posted were Nordic? They look like Swedes? What are you smoking? And these people you posted are black? What is wrong with your head? Seriously.
    We Indians consider ourselves Indians neither blacks nor Whites. But mostly we call ourselves brown. No Light skinned Indian will consider an European closer to him than a dark skinned Indian and no dark skinned Indian will consider himself closer to a black African than a light skinned Indian. When the African students were attacked in Bangalore, in South India, every Indian considered them foreigners. Just like how White people or East Asians or Arabs (who actually look the most similar to us) would be called foreigners.
    The poster ‘Peasant’ is right. you black people are obsessed with skin colour. Very weird

    BTW this is another picture of Agarkar. Yup he looks like your typical Zambian.

    This is Pranab Mukherjee with Ghanians on his official trip to Ghana

    Now check out Shashi Tharoor, Member of Parliament of India, elected from SOUTH INDIA (elected from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala),

    Here is Shashi Tharoor with UN Secretary general Kofi Annan

    Ya rite…..

    You Afrocentrists are desperate to have us in your team. LOL That is soooo pathetic. I am gonna tell my friends about it tomorrow. They are gonna laugh like hell when I tell you about your desperation to have us on your team and your obsession with the SKIN COLOUR of our Hindu Gods. Never before in their lives would they have given thought about this subject. Honestly dude, this is funny as hell. How pathetic……
    But I know what this is really about. So you can claim our civilization for yourself. Classic Cultural appropriation. So some hoodrat dope head in some American slum will shout out ‘We biz kengs and quuuens of India and sheet! ‘ That is what this is all about, is it not?

  154. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    Quite like how his type of slavish indian now paints images of the black hindu gods with non-indian skins.

    This is the problem with these Afrocentrist idiots. No Hindu cares about the skin colour of their Gods in that way you Afrocentrist nutbags think about. Afrocentrists sickos are more concerned about the skin colours of our Gods than we are. If I tell this to my Indians friends they would die laughing. They would say, you guys need to get a life. I do not think me or any of my hindu friend EVER cared about the colour of our Gods, NEVER.

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.

    ” THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated, and women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree, in
    hopes of producing that effect. To my eye the dark color is much more agreeable than the tawny hue of the half-caste, which that of the Makoloto ladies closely resembles. The women generally escape the fever, but they are less fruitful than formerly ; and to their complaint of being undervalued on account of the disproportion of the sexes, they now add their regrets at the want of children, of whom they are all excessively fond.” Livingstone’s Africa, page 204.

    ” Katema, the ruler of the village, asked if I could not make a dress for him like the one I wore, so that he might appear as a white man when any stranger visited him.” Livingstone’s Africa,
    page 517.

    ” The people under Bango are divided into a number of classes. There are his councillors, as the highest, who are generally head men of several villages, and the carriers, the lowest freemen.
    One class above the last obtains the privilege of wearing shoes from the chief by paying for it ; another, the soldiers or militia, pay for the privilege of serving, the advantage being that they are not afterward liable to be made carriers. They are also divided into gentlemen and little gentlemen, and, though quite black, speak of themselves as white men, and of others who may not wear shoes, as ‘ blacks.’ The men of all these classes trust to their wives for food, and spend most of their time in drinking the palm-toddy.” Livingstone’s Africa, page 445.

    ” Zuma, a rich widow of Wava, the owner of a thousand slaves, told me that her husband had been dead these ten years ; that she had only one son, and he was darker than herself; that she loved white men, and would go to Boussa with me.” Clappertori’s Africa, Vol. IV., page 222.

    ” The Foulahs evidently consider all the negro natives as then inferiors; and, when talking of different nations, always rank themselves among the white people.” Mungo Park’s Travels in
    Africa, page 23.

    ” The women are well disposed toward strangers of fair complexion, apparently with the permission of their husbands.” Burton’s Africa, page 216.

    “The Kaffirs believe that white men can do anything.” Baldwins Africa, page 266.

    ” The negro Mohammedans worship God under the name of Allah ; they acknowledge Mohammed as a prophet, but do not pay him divine honors; they have some traditions respecting Jesus Christ, whom they call Nale, the son of Malek, and whom they speak of as a great prophet, who had wrought wondrous miracles. They denounce as impious the doctrine that God could have
    carnal conversation with a woman, but have a prophecy of their own :that some day they shall be all subdued by a white people.” Readers Savage Africa, page 354.

    “The European stranger, travelling in their country, is expected to patronize their wives and daughters ; and they feel hurt, as if dishonored, by his refusing to gratify them. The custom is very
    prevalent along this coast. At Gaboon, perhaps it reaches the acme ; there a man will in one breath offer the choice between his wife, sister, and daughter. The women of course do as they are bid by the men, and they consider all familiarity with a white man a high honor.” Hutchinsori’s Western Africa, Vol. II., page 24.

    ” ‘ I know the white men, too, said the prince, they are good men ; in fact I have reason to speak well of them, for I also am a white man, and therefore I am of opinion that they are of the same
    blood as ourselves.’
    It is in this manner that Falatahs endeavor to claim relationship with Europeans, though these people are either of a swarthy complexion or black as soot ; and this passion to be considered fair is often carried to a most ridiculous height. White men, how sorry soever their outward appearance may be, are certainly considered, not only by Falatahs, but by the native blacks, as a superior order of beings, in all respects more excellent than themselves. At Yaoorie we recollect having overheard a conversation between two men, who were quarrelling in the very height of passion. ‘ What!’ exclaimed one of them to his fellow, ‘ thou pitiful son of a black ant ! dost thou presume to say that a horse was my father ? Look at these Christians ! for as
    they are, I am ; and such were my ancestors ; answer me not, I say, for I am a white man ! ‘ The speaker was a negro, and his skin was the color of charcoal.” Lander’s Travels in Africa, Vol.
    II., page 79.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  155. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    Better example is what happened in May 1940 at Dunkirk. Hitler simply allowed the British to escape from France. Germany could have won the European war there and then.

    Hitler really did not want a war with the British. He thought that the British would come to their senses (which they did not) and that the British people would have a better opinion of him for his magnanimous act. But of course the press was controlled by the elites and they spun the whole thing around as a marvelous daring escape. LOL. The Germans could have crushed those allied forces there and then. It was the media. He was so desperate to not have a war with the British, who he considered the brother people of the Germans that he sent Rudolf Hess, second in command in the Third Reich. But we all know what happened with him/

    Like Putin and Russia today. But unless you believe in that big lie -Cold war 2, Russia is the enemy and Putin the new Hitler – , everyone knows that Russia isn’t an independent country

    Yup it looks like Russia is a fake opposition to the West today.

    What I know is that Bose did try to get help from Germany but he got nothing. IIRC, Hitler never accepted to meet him.

    Jew propaganda has fooled us all for too long, brother.

    Where do you even get such info? Hitler met him, promised to help him but only after the Wehrmacht conquers the Soviet Union. How would the Germans reach India without conquering the Soviet Union? If they had conquered the Soviet Union, Iran was a friend of Germany. The Iranian leader was pro National Socialist, there was a Nazi movement in Iran. So then via Iran/Persia, they could come to India and fight the British forces in India.
    Subhash Chnadra Bose raised an army in the Wehrmacht from POWs from the British Indian Army called the Indian Legion, Indische Legion and there were even Indians in the SS Wafen, Indian Volunteer Legion of the Waffen-SS, Indische Freiwilligen Legion der Waffen-SS.
    But since the war against the Soviets was dragging on, Hitler advised Bose to take a submarine to go to Japan and continue his struggle there. Thus Bose traveled on a U boat to Madagascar where he was transferred to a Japanese submarine and we went to Tokyo where the Japanese government agreed to support him against the British. It is in Singapore that he raised a new Army called the INA from POWs from the British Indian Army. Strangely in Burma, the Indian troops of the INA (Indian national Army) supported by Japanese forces fought Indian troops of the British Indian Army supported by British forces.

    This video will explain everything.

    Also Indian volunteers in the Wehrmacht and SS Waffen

    There were also Muslim Waffen SS division

    Mostly French Algerian Army POWs and Bosnians/Albanians etc….

    When the German command planned to include Indian Muslim troops of the Waffen SS into the Muslim divisions, the Indian Muslims complained that they saw themselves as Indians first and they were retained in the Indian divisions.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  156. Them Guys says:
    @TheJester

    TheJester: Keep in mind, that of all those White women, especially the femNazis feminist types, many, many if not most are actually Jewish women. Or 1/2 Jewish. And you cannot just go by names and last names, due to Jews being famous for doing name changes in order to “fit” as a European whitey and fool others. Name changes, nationality changes, race changes and religious conversions…Fake, False, Fraudulent in many cases.

    This is done, without a doubt, if one just looks at how everything has gone so far the past 100 yrs in usa and several hundred years in EU nations, in order to Hide their Jewishness, and they know sooner or later that proverbial Cat will get out of the Bag, and expose them fully. So if they can convince most peoples of being a European White women, then when the truth and facts come out and things turn for the worse….It will always be, European Whites who get Blamed!…Never Jews get blamed…Take issue of Slavery as just one small example of this phenomenon. Mostly done by Jewry, yet who gets blamed always? European Whites get blamed always…In fact until I discovered this Jewish slavery connection, online Via many articles and proofs, I don’t ever recall hearing Anyone ever blame even a single Jew for slavery in usa or elsewhere. I am 65 yrs old, heard whitey blamed for every slavery issue always and all my life..yet never heard a single mention of Blame a Jew for slavery. Not until aprox 12-15 yrs ago when first discovered vast Jewish connections. Most people still know zero of this factoid. Most also refuse to believe its true too.

    So, now consider all the many other issues and events euro whitey gets blamed for, which actually was done by and for and profited by Jews….The Main question is always…”But, is it Good for Jews?” If Yes, then go for it always…and whenever possible Use whitey as a scape goat for later on blames.

    Also, most every entity and org, such as, NAACP-ACLU-Feminists lefty’s-Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism-AIPAC-and over 300 Other Jewish Orgs within usa-and most every Marxist teaching along with communism itself…ALL was Invented by, Run By, Funded By, Profited from By….Jews. And always promoted as some form or type of Great Goodness for Blacks, Females, School kiddies aka wont you just do it…for….them..CHILDREN Please!…while in reality, any form of goodness intentions never ever existed at all…Except of course good for…Jews.

  157. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    We Indians never had such obsession with White skin. Black people are the one people on this planet most obsessed with skin colour. Some kind of mental problem.

    Radhika Parameswaran on ‘colorism’ in India

    https://www.cmc.edu/keck-center/asia-experts-forum/radhika-parameswaran-on-colorism-in-india

    Bleached girls: India and its love for light skin

    https://theconversation.com/bleached-girls-india-and-its-love-for-light-skin-80655

    Growing Up With India’s Light-Skinned Beauty Standards

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/literally-darling/growing-up-with-indias-light-skinned-beauty-standards_b_8294810.html

    What Colorism Feels Like as an Indian-American Woman

    https://www.teenvogue.com/story/colorism-as-an-indian-american-woman

    India and Colorism: The Finer Nuance

    https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1553&context=law_globalstudies

    How Internalized Colorism Works In India. Dark Still Isn’t Beautiful

    https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2017/07/internalized-colorism/

    THE whole of the colored tribes consider that beauty and fairness are associated

    Nothing could be further from the truth. Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning. A white supermodel type making first contact with African villagers would’ve been considered grotesquely ugly. Even today, amid the onslaught of western culture, very light skin isn’t particularly valued among black Africans. A medium brown skin tone is still the ideal of beauty.

    women long for children of light color so much, that they sometimes chew the bark of a certain tree

    You don’t know Africans very well if you actually believe this claptrap. Indeed, the opposite is true. An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men. In fact it’s backed up by science.

    Study: Men and women view mixed-race male faces as more attractive than White faces

    A new study in The Journal of General Psychology has found evidence that faces of mixed racial phenotypes are perceived as more attractive than stereotypically White and Black faces.

    https://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-men-women-view-mixed-race-male-faces-attractive-white-faces-50614

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
  158. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    There is no “branching away” in the modern human genetic record, there is a continuum. Therefore no modern human racial group is older or younger than any other.

    My God, you are a low IQ monkey of What?

    Watch the video again, you fool

    There is a branching away you stupid fool. The Negroid races it seems is a very recent creation and the Caucasoid race is much much older than the Negroid.

    What we can surmise, logically, is that they were tropically-adapted dark skinned Africans who would’ve looked more like me than you.

    The stupidity of this fool can make one cry. We know their skull structures. You have a Negroid skull structure that looks very different from a person with Caucasoid skull structure. they LOOKED NOTHING like you because, people who looked like you did not even exist for at least more 72,000 years after the Caucasoids left Africa fro Eureasia. These people who left Africa and then came back again had nothing to do with Negroids. Watch the video again, there were many races in Africa and many have become extinct. We have lost a lot of diversity. There were many parallel races living in Africa and your ancestors who did not yet look like you were living parallel with the Caucasians. Your ancestors inbred with some primitive humanoids some 150,000 years ago but these genes are not found in Eurasians.

    Bantu is a language group rather than a racial classification

    Yes that is true. It is a language group but it is sometimes used racially w.r.t Khoi San and the Pgymies. Bantus are taller than pygmies, in that sense.

    There are no “Caucasian facial structures” that are unique to Caucasians or that are not exhibited by black people even in the deepest, darkest Africa.

    Of course there is a Caucasian skull structure which is very different from your skull structure. Ask any forensic department guy in your police department and he will tell you there is. The difference in between Europeans and Africans is NOT ONLY Skin colour. If that is what you idiots believe, you are failures in science.

    Within the black African genome, and with selective breeding, there is everything you need to create white people.

    Nope. Only blacks have descended from black people. Blacks have higher genetic variability because your ancestors have bred with more primitive humans living in Africa and Europeans or Asians do not have those genes in them. You do not have the genes to create White people.

    No, dummy, it’s typical Eurasian features like white skin that are recent adaptations.

    No dummy, watch the video again. White skin is not the only difference in between black negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Skeletal structures are very different as well.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
    , @Bliss
  159. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    Blacks in those days or some black tribes had such preferences. What can I say?

  160. bj says:

    Empire Files: Anti-Black Racism Reveals Israel’s (Jewish) Supremacy

    • Replies: @Malla
  161. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    Where the hell did you learn the absurd idea that a branch has “nothing to do” with what it branched away from?

    The branch which branched out to become Negroids eventually were not the people who left Africa during OOA. They stayed behind and intermated with more primitive archaic humans in Africa and non blacks do not have those genes of those archaic populations. That is what I meant. There were many races living concurrently in Africa and many of them became extinct (that scientist said, we have lost a lot of diversity). But none of them looked like today’s black Negroid people. The Negroid looking people are relatively very recent.

    ou should stick to regurgitating the 19th century racial pseudoscience that you learned at Stormfront. That clearly impresses the racist trash here, and gets you off too.

    My god, what is wrong with the man? Where is Stormfront? Where is 13th century?
    This is from latest the latest scientific research which is coming out. WATCH the video again.

  162. Malla says:
    @Peasant

    I saw a comment recently that blacks do not understand what race is and that they think it is just skin colour. They are so dumb as to have taken to heart the liberal mantra that we should not judge people on the colour of thier skin.

    You are right, dude, these black people are weird. They really think race is just skin colour or that Europeans are just negroid blacks with White skin and that black Negroids are just Europeans with black skin. Crazy!!! There are so Many other physical difference in between the races.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  163. bj says:

    Zionist Jews advocate diversity and inclusion in South Africa, Europe, and USA; but not in apartheid Israel. Perhaps, Ilana Mercer could pen Apartheid: The Truth About The Zionist Jew!

    ‘Israel apartheid state, settlements colonialism’

  164. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    An idea of beauty is undergoing a reevaluation in the west such that brownish skin is considered the most attractive. It is for this reason that white women increasing want children fathered by black men.

    Yup, as per the master plan. I am not surprised at all. The elites want to negrify the White race using their media command, to make a future dumber brown race who will be their good goyim slaves.
    Who was it? Yes Israel Cohen, a Jewish commie, who said
    We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

    https://www.henrymakow.com/the_book_the_bankers_made_disa.html

    We also have the Kalergi plan

    Yup the same tactic they have been using from time immemorial to destroy so many civilizations. Repeated again in USof A too. History repeats itself.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  165. Malla says:
    @bj

    Blacks for them are only weapons to be used to use against Whitey and to negrify the White race so that they can have their Machiah Raj over dumber brown goyim. Take my word, the North East Asians are next after YT. This is an old tactic (of their box full of tactics) they have used it from ancient times on many ancient civilizations.

  166. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    There goes the indian nordicist (Lol) again with the photoshopped pictures.

    Photo shopped pictures? LOL Oh my God!!! SMH…..Ok I will provide videos
    Here is a video of Indian cricket bowler Ajit Agarkar with his wife, the third highest wicket taker in Indian cricket history.

    Here is ex President of the Republic of India, Pranab Mukherjee giving a speech at a ultra nationslist RSS event

  167. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    Do not interpolate into the attitudes of black people the perceptions of racist colonialists or your own perceptions as a self-hating Indian white supremacist. An idea of beauty is governed by conditioning.

    Their observations, if you read the whole books, seem quite honest and fair. So I am sure they wrote what they saw, they wrote the truth accurately.

  168. @Okechukwu

    Wrong. The major consumers of interracial porn are black guys. And what a surprise, the porn is all black guys with white women. I wonder what black women think of the brothers all too obvious fetish? It is understandable that black guys consume huge amounts of interracial porn, because the chance of a black guy getting a white girl is close to zero. Okechukwu, you don’t want to hear what white girls say about black guys.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  169. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    Gypsies may have left N India voluntarily after the Muslim conquest.

    • Replies: @Malla
  170. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    The fewer criminal welfare affirmative action orcs* there are, the better for Whites.

    * also known as obsolete farm equipment

  171. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    “Yup it looks like Russia is a fake opposition to the West today.”

    I think it’s a reasonable conclusion. Russia it the “best enemy money can buy”.

    Western MIC needs a powerful enemy. Russia is that enemy.

    Thank you for the video. I was wrong. I don’t know where I read that stuff about Bose…or maybe I never read it and it’s my memory playing tricks on me.

    You didn’t answer my two questions.

    It’s then correct to conclude that you do admire Hitler and Churchill even though you know that they despised your race ?

    Well, I suppose that is possible. We can even call it love. We don’t need to hate those who hate us, to despise those who despise us.

    But if that is true – you do admire the two war criminals and white supremacists- then one can say that you have more in common with blacks that are obsessed with their skin colour than you think.

    You suffer from alienation. In that case you should do something about it.

    You see, reading your posts (some very interesting) , I thought you were interested in facts/truth.

    And facts tell us that white civilization is a great civilization. Which, of course isn’t incompatible with fact that that civilization committed great crimes. All civilizations did.

    Slavery wouldn’t have been possible w/o participation of blacks themselves. Blacks aren’t victims.

    Children are victims. Adults that are not stupid should accept responsibility for their actions.

    And blacks (lots of them) suffer from alienation. Michael Jackson was so sick (alienation) that he became “white”. That of course didn’t have any impact on millions of blacks. They still love the guy.

    As they still love the black Don Corleone -Barack Obama -, who, as all american war criminals(former presidents) were put in power by the tribe. Blacks of course believe that was their achievement. If you are black and not stupid you would be proud of someone that burned that house and not of someone that entered it to serve the devil.

    All this to say that if it’s really exact you admire Churchill and Hitler, you also suffer from alienation as lots of black folks.

    That would be a pity. I hope I’m wrong.

  172. Dagandy says:
    @Bliss

    Uhm …that cheddar man pigmentation has been proved to be fraud .

    Malla is correct,,your really low IQ.

    @malla …you’ve posted some great stuff that I’ve enjoyed since finding unz .
    Thanks.

    • Replies: @Malla
  173. Truth says:
    @Okechukwu

    Is the Bromance off already?

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  174. Malla says:

    It’s then correct to conclude that you do admire Hitler and Churchill even though you know that they despised your race ?

    I do not admire Churchill. Indeed I dislike Churchill. Churchill alone does not represent the British Empire. As far as Hitler, my admiration depends on the system he created in the Third Reich not much on his racial beliefs. Even his beliefs and actions about Jews (where there is a lot of controversy about what really was done to the Jews, were things hyped up?) are very insignificant when I look at the Third Reich. The enemy of all mankind are the banking elites and he fought them.

    Actually many non Whites are waking up to this fact

    And blacks (lots of them) suffer from alienation.

    I am not sure about that. A single black person in a White town may feel alienated but if he is a decent friendly guy he can make White friends. I have been in similar situation, being the only Indian among groups of Arabs or Whites or East Asians or even blacks. Did not feel alienated one bit as I made friends very fast.

    Michael Jackson was so sick (alienation) that he became “white”.

    I am very doubtful if that was the real reason for his actions. Why did no other black or non White celebrity not take the same step. you must realise that many celebrities are ‘controlled’ by handlers. People like Marilyn Monroe, Elvis etc… lived horrible controlled lives. You would know this if you know how the entertainment industry works. Actually out of alienation, most celebs would be converting to Judaism.

    All this to say that if it’s really exact you admire Churchill and Hitler, you also suffer from alienation as lots of black folks.

    LOL No I do not.

    • Replies: @Bliss
    , @Anonymous
  175. “Still, apartheid South Africa sustained far more critical scrutiny for its non-violent (if unjust) resettlement policies than did the U.S. for its equally unjust but actively violent mass resettlement agenda, say, in South Vietnam.”

    Why “unjust” in South Africa’s case?

    • Replies: @Peasant
  176. Malla says:
    @Anon

    Gypsies may have left N India voluntarily after the Muslim conquest.

    Yes, that is a very good possibility.

  177. Peasant says:
    @Nicholas Stix

    I guess because most people think of Aparthied as being not only morally loathsome but also completely uncessesary. Added to the fact that relocations of urban intergreted neighbourhoods took place in the 1940s with all the mythologising of those areas that continues apace.

    • Replies: @shegetz
  178. kuladanga says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Gosh, you folks have got it bad. I notice every time Ms Mercer posts, she gets trolled for being Jewish or for her politics. With the same rhetoric the neo-Maoist left uses to shut down the discourse. So either come out with some facts as to why this article should not be read, and Madame should not be allowed to post, or shut it.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  179. shegetz says:
    @Peasant

    Even Jews will be purged from SA, as long as they have something the blacks want.

  180. Che Guava says:
    @Malla

    Cricket used to be major in the U.S.A.

    In the latter half of the nineteenth century, the Spalding company invented baseball as a macho version of rounders. It was all intended just to sell stuff, from the start. Spalding equipment.

    They had much press cooperation in pushing their advertising line that baseball represented American manly virtues, and that cricket was for sissies. That was their line, and it is easy to confirm.

    To me, it is quite the opposite, although Spalding clearly won their marketing campaign there.

    • Replies: @Malla
  181. Che Guava says:
    @kuladanga

    I like many of Ilana’s articles, but the simple fact is that her Rabbi father and she willingly played a part in what she now decries, then ran away to Israel when things blew up. In Ilana’s case, going from there to the U.S.A. Don’t have any idea of her father, maybe he is still in Israel, maybe the U.S.A.

    So whenever she is commenting about Sth. Africa or similar, commentors have a right (and, at least one per thread, a duty) to call her out on it.

    It is that simple.

  182. Malla says:
    @Dagandy

    malla …you’ve posted some great stuff that I’ve enjoyed since finding unz .
    Thanks.

    You are welcome buddy.

  183. Malla says:
    @Che Guava

    Cricket used to be major in the U.S.A.

    Yes I know there used to be major cricket matches in between England and USA.

    the Spalding company invented baseball as a macho version of rounders.

    Wow crazy. How businesses can change culture of nations. Reminds me of De Beers, whose advertising campaign made diamond engagement rings a “tradition” in the USA and Japan.

  184. @anonymous

    ” Such as why did the Wehrmacht stop right in front of Moscow and not go ahead.” ”

    Winter began early, by negligence, or intentionally, opinions differ, the German Wehrmacht was not equipped for winter.
    As an example, ‘shitting at minus forty ° Celcius is a life threatening excercise’, the shit freezes inside your body.
    The Luftwaffe did have winter clothing;
    But it was not just shitting and shelter, weapons froze, engines could not be started, and so on and so forth.
    Intentionally no winter clothing, the suspicion is that the responsible general did not want Hitler to win.

    But Moscow was strategically unimportant, as was Stalingrad.
    The Caucasus oil was important.
    I never understood this, until I found out that Japan had promised to attack the USSR if Hitler had taken Moscow and stood at the Wolga.
    In both cases Hitler failed.
    IF Japan would have attacked, I do not think so.

    • Replies: @Malla
  185. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    My God, you are a low IQ monkey of What?

    A hairy Indian has no business calling a black person a monkey. Many of you are damn near as hairy as monkeys. That’s physical evidences of your closeness to monkeys and our distance from them.

    Watch the video again, you fool

    Great. Your source is a homemade YouTube video from a broken-English spewing white supremacist goon from some Eastern European goat-herding village. Just when I think you couldn’t be any dumber, you exceed my expectations.

    There is a branching away you stupid fool. The Negroid races it seems is a very recent creation and the Caucasoid race is much much older than the Negroid.

    Caucasoids are part of the Negroid race, you unscientific asswipe. They are a mere sampling of black African diversity that through tiny tweaks in DNA developed the features commonly associated with Caucasians today. For example, the mutation that’s responsible for the light skin of Europeans is a single tweak about 8000 years ago in a gene known as SLC24A5. Guess where this gene originated. Well, sub-Saharan Africans also carry this gene except they have a G where Europeans have an A. This one tiny substitution (from G to A) is responsible for white skin.

    The stupidity of this fool can make one cry. We know their skull structures. You have a Negroid skull structure that looks very different from a person with Caucasoid skull structure.

    That may be true. But my skull structure is also distinct from many other sub-Saharan African phenotypes, which themselves are convergent with Caucasian phenotypes. As such, there is no such thing as a Negroid skull.

    Of course there is a Caucasian skull structure which is very different from your skull structure. Ask any forensic department guy in your police department and he will tell you there is.

    Forensic anthropologists CANNOT divine race from skulls or bones, dummy. Forensic anthropologists in law enforcement can make an inference based on the circumstantial evidence in the vicinity of the specimen. Otherwise it’s little more than random assignment. So tell me, if we have a skeleton from a person who was 1/4 Nigerian, 1/4 Norwegian, 1/4 Japanese and 1/4 Moroccan, to which race do you assign his bones?

    Nope. Only blacks have descended from black people. Blacks have higher genetic variability because your ancestors have bred with more primitive humans living in Africa and Europeans or Asians do not have those genes in them. You do not have the genes to create White people.

    Haha. You gotta love Stormfront “science.” Man, you are one stupid and delusional motherfucker.

    Here’s the thing, my dimwitted hindu friend, Africans have greater genetic diversity because the Out of Africa migrants were just a small subset of the population, taking with them just a fraction of the continent’s genetic diversity. It’s pretty simple to figure out, unless you’re an idiot.

    No dummy, watch the video again. White skin is not the only difference in between black negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Skeletal structures are very different as well.

    Yeah, you and the uploader of the video would be laughed out of any scientific conference you were crazy enough to present your “research” at. Stick to the pseudocientific community on YouTube and the dark web. Do not, and I repeat, do not ever try to circulate this junk in the real world. You are literally spouting Mortonian phrenology that was utterly and thoroughly debunked in the 19th century.

    • Agree: Bliss
    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Marc43
    , @Malla
  186. Patricus says:
    @Bragadocious

    The North American oppression of indigenous peoples was nothing like the South African domination of the blacks. Our predecessors died overwhelmingly from diseases like small pox. They were not a passive peoples like Africans. Native people could be among the most cruel and barbaric people known in history.

    Not to gloat over the current fate of the Boers. If anything they have a greater claim to that country than the Negroes. They predated almost all of them. In the next decades South Africa will decline to a sad state. Maybe the Chinese can enslave them or starve them.

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  187. Okechukwu says:
    @Bombercommand

    Wrong. The major consumers of interracial porn are black guys.

    The depth of your self-delusion is stunning. But, hey, whatever helps you sleep at night.

    I wonder what black women think of the brothers all too obvious fetish?

    White girls have chased after me since grade school. I wonder who really has the fetish.

    Okechukwu, you don’t want to hear what white girls say about black guys.

    Maybe I’ll ask my white wife, who is a PhD but looks like a supermodel. And then I’ll query all the white girls and women I’ve dated and fucked over the years and even their parents who also loved me. What do you think? Shall I?

    • Replies: @Bombercommand
  188. Okechukwu says:
    @Truth

    Is the Bromance off already?

    The Indian neo-Nazi broke the peace.

  189. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    Yup, as per the master plan. I am not surprised at all. The elites want to negrify the White race using their media command, to make a future dumber brown race who will be their good goyim slaves.

    I don’t think so, dummy.

    Mixed race people taller and smarter, study finds

    https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/ad_174324482-e1435915577690.jpg?quality=80&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=644%2C363

    This couple’s baby could hit the genetics jackpot

    Scientists from Edinburgh University examined the DNA of 350,000 people from different parts of the world and found that people with parents from diverse genetic backgrounds tend to be taller and have sharper thinking skills.

    https://metro.co.uk/2015/07/03/mixed-race-people-taller-and-smarter-study-says-5277767/

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Marc43
  190. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    My God, you are a low IQ monkey

    Lol. Your God Hanuman, is a low IQ monkey? What kind of an idiot worships a monkey as God anyways?

    Note how his monkey God is white skinned while the Indians worshipping him are blackish? That’s because the monkeys in India are pinkish white:

    Many a white tourist in India is followed and harassed by laughing Mallas calling them monkeys. And then those same fools go and worship their monkey God Hanuman. Go figure…

    • Replies: @Malla
  191. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    LOL What are you, a low IQ pig?
    Obviously they are pushing for race mixing. That is the agenda of the elites. They will publish non sense like this to encourage White people to race mix. Man, you are thick.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
  192. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    They really think race is just skin colour

    This is too funny coming from the servile Indian whack job who spends all his time exalting the white racists who confined Indians of all castes in the ghetto called Black Town in Calcutta. And who sent Indians as slaves to South Africa. Why do you think they call themselves white nationalists, white supremacists etc?

    This stupid shameless bugger is in deep, deep, denial and delusion.

    What’s your race Malla? You know that Indians are ASI, closely related to Papuans, Melanesians, Negritos, Timorese, Australian Aborigines, Andaman Islanders etc don’t you?

    • Replies: @Malla
  193. Okechukwu says:
    @Patricus

    The North American oppression of indigenous peoples was nothing like the South African domination of the blacks. Our predecessors died overwhelmingly from diseases like small pox. They were not a passive peoples like Africans. Native people could be among the most cruel and barbaric people known in history.

    LOL. Africans defeated European armies in many encounters and battles. Your Native American ancestors largely laid down and allowed themselves to be vanquished and thoroughly conquered. Many of you were even dumb enough to think the Europeans were gods. Africans had no such illusions.

    Unlike in the Americas, European manifest destiny failed in Africa due to African military resistance. There were powerful empires in Africa that were actually stronger than the Europeans. It wasn’t until these empires declined coupled with the introduction of modern weapons that Europeans were able to make any headway there. But, thankfully, since Europeans started in Africa so late, their hold was tenuous and they were easier to kick out. Try kicking them out of your territories in the Americas.

  194. Marc43 says:
    @Okechukwu

    Smarter than who? Brazil isn’t exactly the cradle of science nor basketball immigrant imports. Leaving aside the propaganda headlines, the genetic defect rate that I see irl is pretty high for people that I know who have mixed race children. In fact, all with defects that I’ve never encountered in non-mixed race children in people that I know.

    Its almost as if our genes are trying to control the breeding viability of mixed race groups. Imagine that.

  195. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    The Mongol Nazis look mean as hell. But not nearly as scary as the nazi Mallas of India:

    https://static.toiimg.com/photo/65347384.cms

    • LOL: Truth
  196. @Okechukwu

    Okechukwu, no “white girls have chased after you since grade school” and you don’t have a white wife that looks like a supermodel and you haven’t “dated and fucked” any white girls and women. Your story is as false as the gibberish about an alleged “black ancient Egypt”. Do you think that falsely suggesting that white girls have a fetish for black guys is going to make me do anything but laugh? Since you brought up the subject, I searched my memory for any black guy/white girl couples I have seen and since 1995 the number is(drumroll) THREE, that’s certainly impressive evidence of a white girl fetish for black guys. I’m a white man and I’ve heard what the white(and asian) girls say about black guys and you don’t want to hear it, but maybe you should. You are simply a victim of the absurd black supremicist propaganda that the media craps out like a sewer(e.g. Beethoven was black/black ancient Egypt and the current media craze of commercials featuring a black guy with a white girl). And Okechukwu, your murky response to my entirely true assertion that black guys consume massive amounts of interracial porn tells me you know exactly what I’m talking about.

    • Troll: Okechukwu
    • Replies: @Okechukwu
    , @Truth
  197. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    Great. Your source is a homemade YouTube video from a broken-English spewing white supremacist goon from some Eastern European goat-herding village. Just when I think you couldn’t be any dumber, you exceed my expectations.

    Home made video? The video cites scientific papers.

    Caucasoids are part of the Negroid race,

    LOL. No they are not you dumb fool. Just because you have that gene does not mean the Caucasian race is part of the Negroid race. Skin colour is not the only difference in between Negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences. Albino Negroids do not look anything like Europeans.

    sub-Saharan African phenotypes, which themselves are convergent with Caucasian phenotypes. As such, there is no such thing as a Negroid skull. Forensic anthropologists CANNOT divine race from skulls or bones, dummy.

    So barks a low IQ monkey

    https://jenjdanna.com/blog/2012/7/10/forensics-101-race-determination-based-on-the-skull.html

    identification of Race- forensic medicine

    https://jenjdanna.com/blog/2012/7/10/forensics-101-race-determination-based-on-the-skull.html

    Forensics 101: Race Determination Based on the Skull

    https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1137&context=totem

    http://www.ijofo.org/article.asp?issn=2542-5013;year=2017;volume=2;issue=1;spage=38;epage=42;aulast=Rawlani

    Racial characteristics of human teeth
    The determination of sex and ancestry can be accessed from shape and form of the skull, especially from skull appearance. Forensic dentists can determine race within the three major groups: Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid. Additional characteristics of teeth, such as cusps of Carabelli, shovel-shaped incisors, and multicusped premolars, can also assist in the determination of ancestry.

    https://www.jpsr.pharmainfo.in/Documents/Volumes/Vol6Issue11/jpsr06111407.pdf

    Racial Variations in Different Skulls

    http://www.delmarlearning.com/companions/content/0766806251/apps/grafolc_d.asp

    Forensic Anthropology: The Purpose and Value of Facial Restoration in Human Skeletal Identification

    Haha. You gotta love Stormfront “science.” Man, you are one stupid and delusional motherfucker.

    What Stormfront Storm front are you guys barking about?

    Africans have greater genetic diversity because the Out of Africa migrants were just a small subset of the population

    Listen dumbo. The OOA population were not a subset of the ancestors of Negroids. Negroids have higher diversity because of interbreeding with primitive archaic humanoids.

    Yeah, you and the uploader of the video would be laughed out of any scientific conference you were crazy enough to present your “research” at. Stick to the pseudocientific community on YouTube and the dark web. D

    Stop your gibber gabbering. The video cites some latest scientific research.

    • Replies: @Bliss
    , @Okechukwu
  198. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    This is too funny coming from the servile Indian whack job who spends all his time exalting the white racists who confined Indians of all castes in the ghetto called Black

    Funny coming from an afrocentrist loser who is desperate to make Indians part of his black race so that he can claim our civilization for his sick disgusting and disturbing agenda. A loser who is weirdly obsessed about the skin colour of Hindu Gods something most Hindus do not even care about. LOL. I have never seen a more pathetic loser in my life.

    deep, deep, denial and delusion.

    LOL

    What’s your race Malla?

    Not the same as yours.

  199. Okechukwu says:
    @Bombercommand

    Only in the wacky world of white supremacists are white women these ethereal heavenly beings that black men are desperate to bed but have no chance with. But in reality, there are probably a thousand ready, willing and eager white women for every black man that wants one.

    • Replies: @Mark44
    , @Bombercommand
  200. Marc43 says:
    @Okechukwu

    A hairy Indian has no business calling a black person a monkey. Many of you are damn near as hairy as monkeys. That’s physical evidences of your closeness to monkeys and our distance from them

    ” Monkey” refers to the percentage and type of hominid admixture. Blacks have a greater percentage of hominid admixture, of more varied and archaic types (Erectus, Habilis, etc), than other groups, which is why you are called “monkey”. That appellation was merely an old social convention of identifying and labeling the physical traits (black skin, African hair, hybrid archaic skull shapes, hormone and the resultant lean mass differences in the young, bone density differences, sexual behavior, social behavior, tool use and technology, etc.) associated with this archaic admixture.

    There is no “physical evidence” of Blacks being distant from those archaic hominids. The Black race exists solely due to Cro Magnid (the only modern unmixed human) mixing with archaic hominids. If you are of the African Race, generally speaking, then your genetic code contains a significant portion of archaic hominid admixture.

    Caucasoids are part of the Negroid race, you unscientific asswipe

    They aren’t. See above. We can make you via intermixing (as we did with archaic hominids), you can’t make us.

    Albino Africans do not look like White people of any type. Albinos still have all of the physical characteristics (mostly remnants of archaic hominid phenotype / body + neural architecture) of Black Africans.

    The out of Africa theory is a lie, which is implied by the relatively recent printed science peer reviewed anthropology journals. In other words, the theory is disproven, according to the printed science, but no one is stating it in the press and pop science magazines for political reasons. What you should be asking yourself is why aren’t they walking the theory back, in spite of it being disproven with the genetic science? Institutionalized conspiracies are never good for minorities.

    That may be true. But my skull structure is also distinct from many other sub-Saharan African phenotypes, which themselves are convergent with Caucasian phenotypes. As such, there is no such thing as a Negroid skull.

    Your naXalt argument for millions of negroid skulls with consistent negroid skull architecture is not an argument.

    Sub-Saharan Africans have the widest genetic variability on the planet, because they are the only “race” that was formed by Cro Magnid intermixing with the exceptionally wide variety of hominids still lurking in the African plains and forests at the time.

    It follows that another way of stating that SS Africans have unqiue skull shapes from one another is to say that African skull shape can vary (away from the Cro Magnid skull and each other) due to hominid admixture type and percentage.

    However, that is not an argument that there is no Negroid skull shape. That’s only an argument that there can be variety in the negroid skull shape, and due to hybridization, and that none match the Cro Magnid Skull shape unless the negroid genetics have been long bred out. Due to genetic variety in Africa that sometimes can realize genetic isolation, it is also conceivable that there is less archaic hominid admixture for some tribes as compared to others. This will also lead to skull shape variability, but in no way implies Caucasoid evolution from those tribes. The gene flow was in the opposite direction.

    Here’s the thing, my dimwitted hindu friend, Africans have greater genetic diversity because the Out of Africa migrants were just a small subset of the population, taking with them just a fraction of the continent’s genetic diversity. It’s pretty simple to figure out, unless you’re an idiot.

    No, the genetic diversity in Africa is due to hybridization with archaic hominids. Within the (very) broad category of the “White race”, our variability mostly comes from the relative percentage of both Caucasian Neanderthal (most of us) and Asian Neanderthal / Denisovan (Turks, possibly Hungarians, probably slavs) for those “races” who were bred out by Mongol invasions and other Mongol contact.

    That’s the truth of the matter. Whites have an instinctual aversion to Black populations as a genetic impulse to avoid interbreeding with populations that carry archaic hominid genetic loads. Nothing is going to change that. Like it or not.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
  201. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    Lol. Your God Hanuman, is a low IQ monkey? What kind of an idiot worships a monkey as God anyways?

    Wow!!! Insulting my religion. NOW YOU HAD IT. Listen bitch, however dumb my religion looks to you, always remember when my ancestors were worshiping Hanuman and Lord Ram in grand temples and writing Sanskrit texts in the court of ancient Kings in palaces of gold, your primitive ancestors were dancing around some mud hut or shit hut, doing their dumb primitive dances around some fire.

    Many a white tourist in India is followed and harassed by laughing Mallas calling them monkeys.

    Why do you Afrocentrists lie so much. Indians are racist against Whites, Indians claim Whites have no culture etc…, Indians even look down upon Whites as mleccha but they never call Whites, monkeys.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  202. Mark44 says:
    @Okechukwu

    There aren’t a thousand willing and eager White women for any man of any race, let alone Black men.

    I recently lived in NYC for a year. Guess how many Black men with White women that I saw the entire time? One, once on the subway. She dressed like she was going through a phase.

    Nowhere on the East coast, where other the White woman and Black man populations are highest, do I regularly see Black men with White women. It is, in fact, fairly rare.

    We know that isn’t because the Black men don’t want them, if the inter-racial rape rate is any indicator.

  203. Malla says:

    Well check this out

    Black man says: Bring back Apartheid

    But of course, bringing back Apartheid would be the worst thing to do, it were the blacks who were benefiting the most out of it. Best thing would be to either get White republics out of the Union and let the blacks, Khoi San, Indians, Coloureds, Cape Malays to have theirs or just leave the country and let everything collapse into third world shitholery.

  204. You thought Madiba was your free pass? Think again and remember well that the European theft and rancid Boer lies and laughable fabrications of hisory do not justify their crimes against humanity. Afrikaners by name are mendacious as they allegiance is to European ancestry and Western hegemony. Ilana Mercer does herself a disservice and us Mzantsi Afrika’s indigenous people a huge favour, in this bizarre and ridiculous revisionist attempt at our history. Soonest Western hegemony on the world will loosen enough to deal decisively an act of contrition from the ill-gotten gains of this so called White population in the Republic of South Africa.
    We have done all we can to accomodate these parasites but they still cling to the arrogance of camaraderie amongst their fellow thieves in Australia, USA, Canada and other white oppressive regimes inherited from Westphalia imperial chicanery.
    The new world order of multilateralism will a desicive victory like we did in Angola and Namibia with embargoed Cuba.
    Ilana Mercer should know better than to constantly be standing on the wrong side of humanity and history.

    • Replies: @Mark21
    , @peterAUS
  205. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    Home made video? The video cites scientific papers.

    Link to a legitimate scientific paper that backs your bullshit. Instead of an obscure YouTube video by an unknown dude, that has very few views.

    The abysmal quality of the comments to that video proves it is nothing but low brow gibberish that can only appeal to evil, hate filled trash like yourself whose sole agenda is to demean and dehumanize Africans.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Them Guys
  206. Malla says:

    Great Video

    African Tribal Wars & The end of Apartheid

    If you want to cut out the movie part go ahead to 6:00 minutes
    Most of the deaths during Apartheid was due to clashes in between the ANC (Xhoshas) and Zulus,
    Looks like the ANC terrorists burned down black schools and hospitals and it were the Whites who ere going to save it. garlanding of old black people by the ANC.

  207. Mark21 says:
    @verspertine

    You thought Madiba was your free pass? Think again and remember well that the European theft and rancid Boer lies and laughable fabrications of hisory do not justify their crimes against humanity. Afrikaners by name are mendacious as they allegiance is to European ancestry and Western hegemony. Ilana Mercer does herself a disservice and us Mzantsi Afrika’s indigenous people a huge favour, in this bizarre and ridiculous revisionist attempt at our history. Soonest Western hegemony on the world will loosen enough to deal decisively an act of contrition from the ill-gotten gains of this so called White population in the Republic of South Africa.

    You people were, at best, occasionally present nomadic goat herders when the Dutch arrived. You weren’t even stationary, let alone productive of some type of civilization that conferred land rights. You were no more owners of that land than if I were to seasonally walk across the uninhabited portions of the Saharan Desert and claim ownership.

    We have done all we can to accomodate these parasites but they still cling to the arrogance of camaraderie amongst their fellow thieves in Australia, USA, Canada and other white oppressive regimes inherited from Westphalia imperial chicanery.

    Thieves? How? Against nomads? Please.The nomadic physical presence of a small number of one race on an entire continent does not confer ownership.

    The new world order of multilateralism will a desicive victory like we did in Angola and Namibia with embargoed Cuba.

    By our laws you live, and if we ever choose to revoke them then you can be eliminated. Thus, all “new world order” is only by our decisions and hand. Don’t fool yourself.

    Ilana Mercer should know better than to constantly be standing on the wrong side of humanity and history.

    Again, don’t be fooled. Any of your progress and survival is by our hand. Presenting like you are the grandmaster, when you are instead blown like a leaf in the wind, is typical African hubris.

  208. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    A hairy Indian has no business calling a black person a monkey. Many of you are damn near as hairy as monkeys. That’s physical evidences of your closeness to monkeys and our distance from them.

    I am sorry I used that ‘monkey’ term. I take it back. I got a bit carried away. Sorry.

  209. Malla says:

    This video will bust some myths about Apartheid South Africa.

  210. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    Link to a legitimate scientific paper that backs your bullshit.

    The video links legitimate papers.

    The abysmal quality of the comments

    LoL says the Afrocentrist fool, man read your own dumb comments first! You write rubbish.

    appeal to evil, hate filled trash

    That describes you more than anything.

    The OOA population were not Negroids as the Negroid looking people did not even exist for the next 72,000 years. There are no Negroid skulls until that period. The ancestors of Negroids interbred with some archaic populations but the OOA population does not have those genes. The truth is the Khoi San and the Negroid are a different branch from the OOA genetic group. There were many races living parallel in Africa but most became extinct. The fact that the Hoffmeyer Skull looked European and was found before the Khoi San and Negroids were even formed shows that Caucasians were there before Negroids even existed on Earth.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  211. peterAUS says:
    @verspertine

    Interesting.

    A question if I may:
    If you were, say, a top adviser and asked by the President there as to what to do, and how, with whites there, farmers in particular, what would be your advice?
    Actions and time table?

    I am sure you have at least a vague idea about both.
    Care to share it here?

  212. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    Indians are racist against Whites, Indians claim Whites have no culture etc…, Indians even look down upon Whites as mleccha but they never call Whites, monkeys.

    You lying sack of crap:

    https://books.google.com/books?id=YYXNIzbhySIC&pg=PA100&lpg=PA100&dq=“lal+bandar”&source=bl&ots=MxATUe8lV9&sig=r80rALITQfW-sMEc9HYMzKrGExI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwio-p-Svp3dAhWBJnwKHaajBocQ6AEwE3oECAQQAQ#v=onepage&q=“lal%20bandar”&f=false

    [the Mallas] would start calling us names: “Bhurrey” (Blondie), “Gorey” (Whitey), and “Lal Bandar” (Red Monkey). I would reply with my own insults in Hindustani getting angrier and more frustrated all the time.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=0gkABAAAQBAJ&pg=PA172&lpg=PA172&dq=“lal+bandar”&source=bl&ots=geRGDe21LL&sig=EvXIk-6Cb8JaHeVmcGK9uN61zOY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwio-p-Svp3dAhWBJnwKHaajBocQ6AEwFHoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=“lal%20bandar”&f=false

    He and his friend taunted Western devotees with off-color remarks. “We used to shout at them ‘Hey, red monkeys’ and have a good laugh, he explained”

    • Replies: @Malla
  213. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    The video links legitimate papers.

    I asked you to link directly to a legitimate scientific paper that supports your bullshit. Link or get lost.

    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2007/01/new-clues-old-skull

    All living humans can trace their ancestry to Africans, who began settling the rest of the world sometime in the past 100,000 years. But precisely when the exodus took place has been a matter of sharp debate.

    Geneticists and paleoanthropologists disagree about whether the ancestors of modern humans began to leave Africa as early as 100,000 years ago or as recently as 50,000 years ago. Although several recent genetic studies have supported a late exodus, fossil evidence has furnished few clues to the timing. Paleontologists have not found any fossils from the crucial period from the most likely source–sub-Saharan Africa.

    In this week’s Science, the team reports that it used state-of-the-art optically stimulated luminescence and uranium series to pinpoint the [Hofmeyr] skull’s age to about 36,000 years.

    Further analysis showed that this skull looks more like fossils of modern humans who lived in Europe and Asia about 36,000 years ago than fossils of Africans or Europeans from the past 10,000 years. That result suggests that the Hofmeyr skull is closely related to the modern humans who first swept into Europe and Asia, and that they all were the offspring of a source population in sub-Saharan Africa. The study also provides the first fossil evidence that the ancestral stock of modern humans left Africa recently. “If there was a very late migration out of Africa, you would expect Europeans at that time to look like Africans at that time,” says Grine.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Mark33
  214. Malla says:

    Very interesting, from the Rhodesian Parliament

    http://www.rhodesia.nl/terrzam.htm

    TERRORIST INCURSIONS FROM ZAMBIA

    Check out how the British Government betrayed the Rhodesians. Even after the Rhodesians suffering so many casualties in WW2 as well as supporting the British Government in the Malaysian Campaign.

    As well as MYTHOLOGIES OF THE TERRORIST WAR

    http://www.rhodesia.nl/myths.htm

    And definitley check this out
    RIVONIA UNMASKED by Lauritz Strydom

    http://www.rhodesia.nl/rivoniaunmasked.pdf

    An account of the Rivonia trial in 1963 and 1964 in which Mandela and a number of other ANC and Communist Party members were convicted of conspiring to overthrow the South African government through violence and acts of sabotage. Their plans included the deployment of thousands of foreign-trained ANC guerrillas to commit acts of terrorism throughout the country and cause chaos. The book includes photos of some of the victims of their initial terrorist operations.

    And check this out
    How to be a Good Communist by Nelson Mandela

    http://www.rhodesia.nl/goodcom.html

    The text of a handwritten manuscript by Nelson Mandela, produced as part of the evidence at his trial in 1963. All the accused, including Mandela, denied being communist saboteurs and terrorists. Many of his subsequent speeches and statements to this day, praising communist countries and their dictators while condemning the West, belie that claim.
    “It has been obvious that numerous individuals were Marxist-Leninists, serving the party with their whole heart; yet they were never listed in any official government publication, or proven to be such in any court of law. Some of the most dangerous people in South Africa are not those whose names appear as listed communists in the Government Gazette. Rather, they are those whose names should appear, but don’t.”
    A History of Communism in South Africa – Henry R. Pike, 1988

    Anatomy of Terrorism

    http://www.rhodesia.nl/terrorism.html

    Series of booklets published by the Rhodesian Government in the 1970s to make the world aware of the atrocities being carried out by the terrorist groups of Mugabe and Nkomo. This section consists of several booklets and a selection of graphic photos of the victims of terrorism.

    Africa and Communism
    http://www.rhodesia.nl/Africa and Communism.pdf

    While not specifically about Rhodesia or South Africa, this book gives an overview of events in Africa with specific reference to the Communist advance and threat to both white-ruled countries and is important for an understanding of the background to U.D.I. in Rhodesia and the reluctance of the whites in both countries to accept a transfer to black rule at that time. The book covers the harsh realities of life in black Africa in comparison with the situation in Rhodesia and South Africa.

    Great books, enjoy reading, a Wealth of Information.

  215. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    Listen you stupid nut. i have never heard the Lal Bandar (Red Monkey) been used ever in my life.
    White people are normally called Goras (Fair/White)

    The Monkey word is used for blacks but that also sometimes.
    Check this out

    However I do not approve of the behavior of some Indians shown in these videos if the Africans are innocent decent people. It is disgusting way to behave towards good people. Many Africans commit crimes in India, desperate for local women or act very arrogantly and thus get a reaction. But again many Africans are just good students who want to study. The latter group should be treated with respect and friendliness.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  216. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    All living humans can trace their ancestry to Africans, who began settling the rest of the world sometime in the past 100,000 years. But precisely when the exodus took place has been a matter of sharp deba

    That result suggests that the Hofmeyr skull is closely related to the modern humans who first swept into Europe and Asia, and that they all were the offspring of a source population in sub-Saharan Africa. The study also provides the first fossil evidence that the ancestral stock of modern humans left Africa recently. “If there was a very late migration out of Africa, you would expect Europeans at that time to look like Africans at that time,” says Grine.

    The low IQ of this fool will make one cry. SMH
    They looked like Africans of THAT time, that does not mean a Negroid black like you because negroid blacks like you DID NOT EXIST at that time. AFRICAN DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN NEGROID BLACK, get his in your thick low IQ head. There were many parallel races living in Africa, some of whom have become extinct today (as the researcher said ‘we have lost a lot of diversity’). The ancestors of Negroids who yet did not look like Negroids were only one of those races. Similarly the ancestors of Khoi San. Similarly there was a distinct population in Africa who already had Caucasoid skulls, skull structures like Europeans. We do not know about their skin colour but their facial structure was already European and this genetic line is different from the genetic line which later evolved into negroids only 8000 years ago. 36,000 years ago there were no negroids who looked like you but the ancestors of the negroids were not these Hoffmayer people. There were many African races during that period. the population which became black Negroids were just one of them. The population which left Africa was another one of them out of many. I hope your thick head got some knowledge in but I doubt it. You could say SOME Africans of that time already looked like Europeans. My God I am tired repeating the same thing all the time but this is what you get when you are explaining something to thick headed dumbfarts.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  217. Mark33 says:
    @Bliss

    Argue with a an African or SJW, get (mere) assertions standing in as proofs and supposed conclusions with the expected (circular) logical holes in them when stood up against the referenced evidence.

    The central thesis of your article:

    Further analysis showed that this skull looks more like fossils of modern humans who lived in Europe and Asia about 36,000 years ago than fossils of Africans or Europeans from the past 10,000 years. That result suggests that the Hofmeyr skull is closely related to the modern humans who first swept into Europe and Asia, and that they all were the offspring of a source population in sub-Saharan Africa. The study also provides the first fossil evidence that the ancestral stock of modern humans left Africa recently.

    For context, I’ll add this information from Wikipedia:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofmeyr_Skull

    It is one of a very few anatomically modern human skulls that have been discovered on the continent which have been dated to over 20,000 years old.

    Note the bolded conclusion in your article that is founded in nothing.

    The inverse migration pattern could easily be as true, and moreover, given what we know the truth of the part that reproduction with hominids played in our racial diversity, you cannot state whether or not this skull was found before or after that hybridization process occurred with “modern humans” (cro magnid) in Africa to create the Black race.

    You cannot assume that Black people existed in Africa before a certain period, only hominids (for which there is skeletal evidence dating back over one million years). The article’s new conclusions work backward from an assumed conclusion that is in contention here: that Caucasians are evolutionarily derived from “Black” African populations.

    Because that assumed conclusion, which I will remind you is a theory, is not proven then the article’s new conclusions are nonsense.

    The article author may have just as well stated: “We think that Caucasians are derived from African populations, and so a new modern human skull that we found in Africa must prove that it was the offspring of Black Africans and reinforce our first theory”. Its circular logic.

    Cro Magnid migrated to Africa and bred with the hominids there. That’s your explanation, which is consistent with the following (mostly studies or articles commenting on studies, as opposed to your pop sci article with sophomoric conclusions):

    [MORE]

    Research conclusion: Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/

    Research conclusion: Eastern Mediterranean needs to be considered as just as likely a place of hominin diversification and hominin origins as tropical Africa.

    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177127

    Research conclusion: No known hominin is ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans (Cro Magnid).

    https://phys.org/news/2013-10-hominin-ancestor-neanderthals-modern-humans.html

    Research conclusion: “Caucasians” did not evolve from Africans and likely did not migrate out of Africa, but into Africa.

    http://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566

    A territorial origin of haplogroups α- and β-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south. Haplogroup B is descended from β-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lat- eral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.

    Research conclusion: Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa

    http://www.pnas.org/content/108/37/15123.full

    Research conclusion: Early modern humans mated with Homo species in Africa. Sub-Saharan genetic diversity is due to introgression with archaic Hominids.

    https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/03/21/285734

    Research conclusion: 28,000 yr old European Cro Magnid genetics are unchanged from modern European genetics, absent any modern Hominid admixture. (note: so much for that racial evolution).

    The Paglicci 23 individual carried a mtDNA sequence that is still common in Europe, and which radically differs from those of the almost contemporary Neandertals, demonstrating a genealogical continuity across 28,000 years, from Cro-Magnoid to modern Europeans.

    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002700

    Research conclusions (from the conclusions cited at Wikipedia): Neanderthal-derived and Denisovan-derived ancestry is significantly absent from most modern populations in Sub-Saharan Africa..

    The observed excess of genetic similarity is best explained by recent gene flow from Neanderthals to modern humans after the migration out of Africa.

    The findings show that the source of modern human gene flow into Neanderthals originated from a population of early modern humans from about 100,000 years ago, predating the out-of-Africa migration of the modern human ancestors of present-day non-Africans

    My summary: European and Asian mixing with Eurasian hominids (Neanderthal and Denisovan) did not occur in Africa (as evidenced by the fact that Africans largely do not carry these genetics), but at the same time would have had to occur well before the proposed Out of Africa Date. This invalidates the Out of Africa Date, and thus a crucial pillar of the theory (which is date specific according to their cited evidence).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interbreeding_between_archaic_and_modern_humans

    • Replies: @Bliss
    , @Malla
  218. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    i have never heard the Lal Bandar (Red Monkey) been used ever in my life.

    That’s just further proof that you are a lying fraud:

    http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/09/15/caste_no_bar/

    Are whites respected? I dont know, I’m not so sure actually. I spent a year in India, Some people respected me, but I was also called a Lal Bandar alot in the North (people assumed I didn’t understand any Hindi). Of course there are lots of people in India, and they have a range of views. Many Indians like other cultures, and intermarriage is also possible nowadays I agree. But some also don’t respect us and commonly use words like Lal Bandar for whites, and for other types of mlecchas they use Chinky and so on. In India being called a Lal Bandar was almost normal for someone like me-it was so common I almost thought it was my name! I got used to it but I could see that a lot of people are corroded by jealosy & envy in North India (not very good for their blood pressure or stomach acidity I suppose). I’m a vegetarian teatoataller and a Yoga teacher, but anyway, I’m also a Lal Bandar. What caste is a Lal Bandar like me supposed to be? Any ideas?

    • Replies: @Malla
  219. @Okechukwu

    Okechukwu, avoiding the substance of my comment won’t help you, especially if you avoid it by telling another goofy whopper. You do not have a white wife that looks like a supermodel, you have not ” dated and fucked” any “white girls and women”, and no ” white girls have chased after you since grade school”. Your stories are as false as the gibberish about an alleged “black ancient Egypt”. And remember, Okechukwu, you are the one who brought up the subject of interracial porn.

    • Replies: @Bliss
    , @Okechukwu
  220. Them Guys says:
    @Malla

    Malla; you will never convince him based on any facts, or even common sense. For, Okeboy is the UNZ forum, African Kang of Coonspiricy’s. Like a smarter version of a Detroit Ghetto Monkey that typically ends up as the main, Suspook. Dey Wuz KANGZ! an, Sheeeeiiiittt! Then Ol’ Whitey came along and, Dun Stole it all away, and da darkie Kangz nebba, ebba wuz able to rebuild Humpty-Darkie again! An, Sheeeeiiiittt!

    PS: all his phony nonsense about whitey has more body hair…Well, calling most African Ghetto Blacks a, Monkey or an, Ape or Chimp….Has Zero to do with how much or how little body hair blacks have. It is based on overall appearance, especially when they do their, Monkey-Down dancing. And even more so is based on their Actions in every day life and open to public view. Regardless what they do, where done at, most look as if they are desperate to copy aka Ape a real Chimp or Baboon.

    And most anybody can cause black africans to act like apes, via causing them to do that Monkey Down Dance. All one need do is take a loud ghetto blaster radio or CD-player, set it to any type Rapp-Crap jungle Bongo drum sound “music”, and within 20-seconds flat, Or Less yet! No matter how many blacks are in a Bar, Stores Mall, restaurant, McDonalds, School, or just out on public street in a Detroit Ghetto zone… They most all present jump up and start their monkey down dancing. Ie: With a slight crouch stance, huge ass sticking out and back, knees slightly bent so to be able to move up & down, with face and chin tilted upwards as if stretched to limit to portray their famous, Uppity-Arrogant Black look. And always must include that they also do the famous Clenched Fist, black power Pump. Which has their arm raised high, with clenched fist being pumped constantly, as if turning a pump handle round and round. All combined and timed to function at same time…Big ass stuck outwards/backwards and crouch move up & down just enough to cause ass to move out and back in and out again. With that famous arm raised high in air doing fist pump. And most important, always maintain a constant facial look of the most arrogant and uppity negro look possible…An very Angry uppity look. The Blacks famous Ghetto, Monkey Down, Dance.

    And they will keep doing that dance as long as ghetto blaster radio batteries do not run down! Hours on end! Oh almost forgot to include, that with their dance moves, comes a mandatory vocal sounds…Sounds that ironicly Mimic exactly how a Real Jungle Ape or Baboon sounds. Like an, Ooo… Ooo Oo. When a room or outdoor venue has as many as several hundred dancing to the bongo jungle rapp “music”, and mixed with that group hum sound of a jungle Ape, it mezmerizes and semi-Hypnotizes them into a frenzy of wild monkey down dancing like nothing else. Many blacks, especially in public school settings, will even do that exact same dance scenario described, even withOUT any music being heard!….They can be in midle of a math class, with Teacher speaking and teaching, or doing a math testing of entire class room, and all of a sudden….without any advance warnings, the black half or 2/3rds of class will Jump up as if bit by rattle snake, and begin doing the monkey down dance! Even when No musics heard!….A very amazing species to view, as long as you do not get too close…Safety First, eh. Do not make same mistake most lib dem Whiteyss make, and assume all is safe as can be in any location with more than, Two of such species present. Even a lone Ape like actor can be dangerous. Espeicially for Female Whites.

    • Replies: @Malla
  221. Truth says:
    @Bombercommand

    I searched my memory for any black guy/white girl couples I have seen and since 1995 the number is(drumroll) THREE,

    Yeah Bro, but then you were diagnosed as legally blind in ’96.

    • Replies: @Bombercommand
  222. Them Guys says:
    @Marc43

    Okeboys Coonspiricy of African Blacks, one day, turned into a Euro Whitey man, is the goofiest coonspiricy yet. So then just why do we not today keep seeing examples of a black turning itself into a white? Why would they quit doing that? All total nonsense. White IS White, and blacks/browns, well some think long ago some African black human had sex with and created a 1/2 & 1/2 Sub human half baboon or chimp. Let it remain alive, grow to adult hood, and make yet more, copies! After a few thousand years of it…We now see a world full of well over a billion or more such sub humans.

    This has been very drastic to White nations, and the world, everywhere example’s of such sub humans are at. Every major usa city that used to be all or almost all white, and then changed via hoards of blacks infiltrating those cities, have proven beyond ALL doubt to be a totally fucked up, crime ridden, roach and rat infested, garbage like putrid stench everywhere, city like….DETROIT!

    Every city, every time, went from a wonderful safe and prosperous very low crime rate, peaceful location for whites to live and flourish within…..Into the absolute worst, deadliest, crime filled wasteland of Negro Ghetto trash. Dope-Hookers-Shootings-Knifings-jobs and stores shut down, most buildings ready to fall and collapse in next semi strong wind, and abject Filthy city existence for all who still reside there…EVERY city, EVERY Time, Always from swell to disgusting filthy bad.

  223. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    I have never heard lal bandar in my life. Of course I cannot be everywhere so I have not heard everything. if this is the case, I was totally unaware of it till now. Whites are called ‘bloody goras’, ‘White people have no culture’ etc….But blacks are far more likely to be called monkeys as you will be seen in the video.

    https://qz.com/india/536335/africas-leaders-are-being-feted-in-new-delhi-but-ordinary-africans-are-called-black-monkeys/

    Africa’s leaders are being feted in New Delhi, but ordinary Africans are called “black monkeys”

    “But as we are weaving our way through the crowded compartment, the African youth, in front of me, accidentally grazes the elbow of a lady constable.

    She shouts, “He touched me. The black monkey touched me.”

    https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2016/06/african-india-demons-160620101135164.html

    Being African in India: ‘We are seen as demons’
    After a year in India, Zaharaddeen Muhammed, 27, knows enough Hindi to understand what bander means. Monkey.
    But it isn’t even the daily derogatory comments that make him doubt his decision to swap his university in Nigeria for a two-year master’s degree programme in chemistry at Noida International University.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  224. Them Guys says:
    @Bliss

    A Wise monkey, never monkeys with another monkeys, monkey…..Uncle Joe, 1957.

  225. Bliss says:
    @Bombercommand

    Your stories are as false as the gibberish about an alleged “black ancient Egypt”

    Unfortunately for you, “black ancient Egypt” is undeniably true:

    The Great Sphinx and the Great Pyramid:

    The first Pharaoh of Egypt:

    Pharaoh who founded the Third Dynasty of Egypt:

    Pharaoh who built the Great Pyramid of Giza:

    Pharaoh Sahure (~2500 B.C.):

    Pharaoh Mentuhotep (~2000 B.C.):

    Pharaoh Senusret:

    Pharaoh Amenemhat III:

    • Replies: @Bombercommand
  226. Bliss says:
    @Mark33

    My summary: European and Asian mixing with Eurasian hominids (Neanderthal and Denisovan) did not occur in Africa (as evidenced by the fact that Africans largely do not carry these genetics), but at the same time would have had to occur well before the proposed Out of Africa Date. This invalidates the Out of Africa Date, and thus a crucial pillar of the theory (which is date specific according to their cited evidence).

    What part of “the study also provides the first fossil evidence that the ancestral stock of modern humans left Africa recently” didn’t you understand?

    Neanderthals and Denisovans weren’t modern humans, were they?

    • Replies: @Mark34
  227. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    You clearly have a problem with reading comprehension, and rational thinking:

    They looked like Africans of THAT time

    They looked like Europeans of THAT time as well. There were no “modern humans” in Europe until modern humans from Africa got there.

    The population which left Africa was another one of them out of many.

    You seem to think that the entire population of that type left en masse for Europe. Which is very imbecilic of you. The Hofmeyr skull dates to the same time period as similar skulls some 10,000 miles away in Europe. What does that tell you?

    There were many African races during that period. the population which became black Negroids were just one of them.

    What part of the following was so hard for you to comprehend, you blithering imbecile?

    The study also provides the first fossil evidence that the ancestral stock of modern humans left Africa recently. “If there was a very late migration out of Africa, you would expect Europeans at that time to look like Africans at that time,”

    The ancestral stock of all “modern humans” is the same, whether in Africa or out of Africa. Drill that into your thick skull you moron.

    • Replies: @Malla
  228. @Truth

    Watch your dumbass mouth “Troof”. I GUARANTEE you would not dare snark off like that to my face. And since you stupidly brought it up, I will give details of these three glorious bi-racial couples. The first, the white girl was a friend, she got together with this Kang, a failed petty criminal, in November 1994, by February 1995 he was dead in her bed of an overdose of morphine pills, good riddance. The second, 2006, I was walking down the street when I see a parked car, white girl in driver seat and standing by the door a Kang, punching her face through the window. I intervened, so he would come after me. He was screeching at me, but didn’t follow up on his threats(unusually wise for a Kang), then he jumped in the car and it drove off, but he must have still been punching her because in half a block a police cruiser lit up and pulled them over, again good riddance. The third, 2008, nothing unusual, she didn’t look very tight with her Kang, but maybe she was deleriouly happy and I’m too stupid to see it. But back to you “Troof”, watch your idiotic mouth.

    • Replies: @Truth
  229. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    I have never heard lal bandar in my life. Of course I cannot be everywhere so I have not heard everything. if this is the case, I was totally unaware of it till now.

    You must be from South India then. In North India they probably call you guys black monkeys as well. Right? And the North Indians are probably called black monkeys when they they go most places outside the subcontinent. So stop getting off on calling Africans that, you filthy evil street shitter. Karma’s a bitch. Capische?

    Btw, the North Indians probably call whites red monkeys because their faces are burned red from the hot Indian sun.

    • Replies: @Malla
  230. Anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    “As far as Hitler, my admiration depends on the system he created in the Third Reich not much on his racial beliefs.”

    You can’t separate them -the system and his racial beliefs.

    “The enemy of all mankind are the banking elites and he fought them.”

    Agree but don’t forget that he was put into power by the banking elites so I’m not sure he really fought them. I’mean , no doubt he fought them rhetorically…But the banking elites are not stupid.

    Normally they don’t put someone in power that they don’t control. The Bolsheviks also “fought” the banking elites and we know where the money came from that allow that bunch of criminals to get into power.

    I was using “alienation” in sense of being alienated from the values of one’s society, family and the racial group that one happens to be born into.

    Michael Jackson was very alienated guy because he hated his skin colour..Like lots of blacks.

    Leopold Sedar Senghor was a very alienated African intellectual and politician. He would like to have been born French.

    Alienation and stupidity explain why Africans admire Barack Obama. They can prove to the white man that they can also do it. That BO was put into power buy the tribe, doesn’t matter for most of the blacks.

    I accept that you are not alienated in spite of your admiration for Hitler.

    thanks for the videos.

  231. @Bliss

    Unfortunately for you, Bliss, “black ancient Egypt” is bullshit. The photos you so kindly provide do not prove your case, or even suggest it. The “black ancient Egypt” gibberish is easily debunked. First, there is genetics. DNA from numerous Pharoahs has been found to be the same as present day Egyptians of the Nile Delta, so you’re dead wrong Bliss. There is no SubSaharan DNA in Egyptians until 700AD, the result of the Islamic slave trade, and its a miniscule amount. This genetic research was done after 2010, but I have debunked “black ancient Egypt” gibberish back in the 1990′s using archeological remains. Since you too seem to have an interest in Egyptology, I would like to direct your attention to Egyptian Tomb Painting. The Egyptians had an extensive painting tradition, but unfortunately only the tomb paintings survived, protected from the weather in the tomb vaults. These paintings have been documented photographically and books are available featuring this documentation. A very good one is Egyptian Painting, 1978 Editions d’Art Albert Skira SA, Geneva. I have the American edition published by Rizzoli International Publications Inc, 1978, as it has an English text. Bliss, I would direct your attention to Tomb of Huy, where you will be disabused of your delusions. Huy was a nobleman employed by Pharoah to procure mercenaries, and his tomb is decorated with scenes of his work. One painting shows a squad of (Nubian?) mercenaries marching. The sub Saharan black troops are realistically portrayed, they have dreadlocks and their skin is rendered in Burnt Umber pigment. They are very obviously black African, and are distinctly different from the way Egyptian painters depicted other Egyptians. One tomb painting featuring a scene of a work crew has an older man with straight gray hair and BLUE EYES. Bliss, the photos you show feature a lot of Pharoahs, so perhaps you could turn your attention to Rameses II, whose mummy has survived. Rameses II has red hair, red as a Scotsman, and his face is in very good condition and doesn’t remotely resemble a sub Saharan African. Note, I am not suggesting Rameses II was Scottish or that Egyptions were “white”. In my opinion, from the appearance of polychromed portrait busts, an average Ancient Egyptian man would look identical to Gamel Nasser(if I spelled his name correctly). I certainly don’t expect to change your mind Bliss, as the “black ancient Egypt” goofs only see what they want to see.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  232. @Anon

    We should ponder whether to reclaim the land stolen by the Tervingi in AD 376, the Visigoths between AD 410 and AD 460 (these locusts were quite busy, first they sacked Rome, then they stole half of Gaul and later large swathes of the Iberian peninsula) and not to forget the Ostrogoths under Theodoric the Great around AD 480 (grabbed themselves a nice chunk of Italy).

    The difficulty is in deciding who should get it post confiscation. The supply of historically oppressed & perennially aggrieved people who can be relied upon to to bugger it up is probably insufficient in the regions concerned. Nevertheless, justice has to be served; these land thefts of yore cannot just go unpunished. Perhaps the new owners could be imported from Africa? This would kill several birds with one stone.

    Anyone doubting the wisdom of this proposal is basically Hitler.

    • Replies: @Neil Templeton
  233. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @HdC

    And you reply with typical anonymous semiliterate illogicality.

  234. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    They looked like Europeans of THAT time as well. There were no “modern humans” in Europe until modern humans from Africa got there.

    They did not look like black Negroids. They had a skull structure very different from black Negroids. The skulls are more similar to Caucasoid than to negroid.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17218524

    “The skull is morphologically modern overall but displays some archaic features. Its strongest morphometric affinities are with Upper Paleolithic (UP) Eurasians rather than recent, geographically proximate people.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/11/science/11cnd-skull.html

    “Because the Bushmen are well represented in the more recent archaeological record, Dr. Harvati said, they were expected to bear a close resemblance to the Hofmeyr skull. Instead, the skull was found to be quite distinct from all recent Africans, including the Bushmen, she said, and it has “a very close affinity” with fossil specimens of Europeans living in the Upper Paleolithic, the period best known for advanced stone tools and cave art.

    Much to my amazement,” Dr. Grine said in an interview, “the skull linked very closely with those from Europe at the time and not with South African remains 15,000 years on.””

    Explained here better

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Bliss
  235. Malla says:
    @Them Guys

    Yes they are quite thick headed. Okechukwu is still OK. He is a black guy who is proud of being Nigerian etc… and some harsh comments here pisses him off and he fights back. This I can understand where he is coming from though he acts thick headed and arrogant. But I can understand where he is coming from
    This Bliss character is a different type. I know his type, I have met them. Mostly hate the fact that they are born ugly and crappy and take out their frustrations via some form of vicious psychotic hatred against YT. I have met these kinds before.

    • Replies: @Truth
  236. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    You must be from South India then.

    I am a Papuan from Port Moresby. A raskol gang member.

    So stop getting off on calling Africans that,

    I HAVE NEVER called an African that. In deed I oppose the attacks on Africans in India provided they are good people. And even if they have committed a crime (as a significant number of them do) give them to the police. Thuggish Indians who attack or name call innocent African students should be dumped in jail.
    I was pissed off about the thickheadedness of Okechukwu and I blurted it out (by typing) and I apologized later.
    What is interesting that when you wrote about Indians calling Whites ‘lal bandars’ or ‘red monkeys’ which is very rare, you were jumping with glee. When pointed out the much more frequent name calling of blacks as bandars or monkeys, you are all ‘Do not do this, this is not good’. LOL.

  237. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe Wong

    Perhaps your seemingly invincible stupidity and ignorance can be penetrated by getting you to think deeply about Europe’s richest country. Germany’s railways, factories, housing and much else of its infrastructure and even agricultural capacity were destroyed by the end of WW2 and many of it’s people displaced. It didn’t recover and recover and overtake all others while paying out much compensation to victims and pensions to disabled members of its armed forces because of any past or current colonial or imperial depredations. Think human capital and social cooperation. Familiar concepts? They should be if you consider the differences in economic growth between some or most East Asian politics and African or Latin American countries since 1945.

  238. Malla says:
    @Malla

    So you see the Hoffmayr Skull people were already very similar to modern Europeans and very different from Khoi San/Capoids or black Negroids. As Coon’s research found out that the Upper Paleolithic Euros were already quite similar to modern Europeans and their bodies have changed physically very little.

    Cattell’s research in 1979 found that the Upper Paleolithic Euros were already like modern Euros and VERY DIFFERENT from Mongoloids and definitely Negroids.

    So we see that African does not necessarily mean black Negroids. And it seems European people have been in Southern Africa before black Bantus (and even Khoi San/bushmen) were even formed.
    So it seems South Africa, Rhodesia etc… should belong to the Whites. They were there first. Even Asian Indians being half Caucasoid (ANI) have a better claim to Southern Africa than black bantus and Khoi San!!! Send this info to Malema.

  239. @Malla

    Don’t spoil the credit you get for good stuff by talking out of your hat on matters about which you are totally misinformed. There was no false flag incident involved in the further restrictions on gun ownership in Australia and the gun buybacks enacted about 21 years ago after mentally disturbed former soldier Julian Knight in inner Melbourne’s Hoddle Street shot a few people and the mentally retarded loner Martin Bryant shot a lot of people at Port Arthur, Tasmania. Please try not to be one of those strange commenters infesting UR threads who have absolutely no judgment or discrimination about the websites they trust and no instinct for suspecting the clichéd dodgy story.

    • Replies: @Malla
  240. Malla says:
    @Mark33

    Cro Magnid migrated to Africa and bred with the hominids there.

    I wonder, if the Cro Magnids were the Adamites and the story of Ham’s fornication with a pre Adamite woman on the ship of Noah may be an indication of the formation of Negroids. I do not know, just a thought. Of course the story of Noah was taken from Sumerian myths but it may be a documentation in the form of story telling of of what happened. The question now is how were Negroids formed? Where did they come from?

    • Replies: @Mark31
  241. Blake says:

    Interesting piece. Never mentioned the Palestinian Nakba though which created the worlds largest and longest suffering refugee population we have today

  242. Mark34 says:
    @Bliss

    What part of “the study also provides the first fossil evidence that the ancestral stock of modern humans left Africa recently” didn’t you understand?

    Ignoring your emotionally charged sarcastic phrasing that I’m unlikely to respond to after this, and ignoring the fact that I had to spend ten minutes trying to find your quote because you didn’t cite your source:

    This was already earlier addressed in the Hofmeyr Skull discussion. You are repeating a source that was prior responded to. Worse, you are citing a pop science writer who is using circular logic to reach a conclusion, not critiquing nor citing primary source research. Whereas I cited six primary sources.

    Again, for your convenience because you cannot be bothered to read past responses:

    The author’s logic is flawed if not circular. There is zero basis to assume that the Hofmeyr individual was representative of a population that later migrated OOA, rather to Africa. The author’s conclusion is founded on an assumption that we came out of Africa, and thus cannot be used reinforce (prove) that assumption. Its circular logic. The skulls rarity reinforces such pessimism as to the author’s conclusions.

    No, Neanderthal’s and Denisovan’s were not modern humans. Cro Magnid is the only modern human. What is your point, exactly?

  243. Malla says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Well you obviously know more about how things work in the land down under. However there have been suspicions about official story the Port Arthur massacre of 1996.

    Port Arthur Massacre – Deceit Or Terrorism?

    In the year 1996, 28th of April, Martin Bryant a 28 year old man went on a killing spree at a popular tourist site in south-eastern Tasmania in Australia. 35 people died and 37 people wounded. As with Most conspiracy topics, facts are usually compared with the official story and as usual things don’t add up. This video has a first hand witness to the massacre and she tells of her ordeal and the events that happened that day as she recalls them. Also a former Police Member goes through the detail and proposes some questions that challenge the official story.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL2eLtOyHAg
    The Truth about The Port Arthur Massacre

    Now are these people who challenge the official story right? I do not know. Maybe they got it all wrong. But I do not understand what would anybody gain by challenging the official story. The people speaking in the first video do not look like nutcases to me.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  244. KenH says:

    A decade later occurred the war in the Philippines, where a million Filipinos perished at American hands.

    That’s typical distortion. The majority of sources have the death total at 200K, mostly by disease and famine. Similar to Vietnam, Filipino insurgents killed large numbers of their own people and this fact is usually missing from the narrative so the given author can make America look genocidal towards the saintly non-whites. General Jacob Smith, who committed atrocities against the Filipino people in retaliation for a guerrilla massacre of U.S. troops, was court-martialed for his actions.

    Does the state of Israel whom Illana adores court martial or discipline Jewish officers who commit atrocities against Palestinians? Do Muslim or Asian nations? Hell no, most of them celebrate atrocities against “the other”.

    The fact is that between 1942 and 1945, the FDR administration dispensed with habeas corpus in order to relocate en masse, and confine in camps, some 112,000 Japanese aliens and American-born citizens of Japanese ancestry.

    Well there were Japanese Americans engaged in espionage against the U.S. Both German-Americans and Italian Americans were also interned. Japanese Americans were awarded 1.65 billion in restitution by conservative icon and “white supremacist” Ronald Reagan. The Germans and Italians received nothing.

    A German American who was interned during this time filed a case for restitution for Germans and Italians but even with white privilege the SCOTUS refused to hear his case after the D.C. court of appeals ruled against him. His case was based on equal protection under law but as we know some groups are more equal than others in this wonderful equalocracy called merica.

    • Replies: @Anon
  245. @Malla

    People love their 15 minutes in the limelight. People love to be asked for their views.

    I can just about imagine those who support America’s NRA for their own economic interest cooking up something in Australia which would make gun ownership and concealed carry look like a good idea but imagination fails me when I try to find a realistic scenario for the banners.

  246. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    I think you will find that Israel does run such court martials, not often and with not many severe punishments no doubt.

    On the German’s claim I suppose the problem to have been that the Japanese were getting ex gratia compensation, not something they could have sued for under the laws. Hence no “equal protection of the laws” but not for the reason you imply: just a pure legal reason using judicial/legal logic.

  247. wesmouch says:

    The gist of many comments is that Ms Mercer backed the overturning of apartheid that led to the current mess for whites in South Africa now. It is a fact that she is Jewish. It is also a fact that many Jews back a multicultural society because they feel safer in it. Of course this does not apply to Jews when they control the levers of power such as in Israel where there is a de facto apartheid system for Arabs. My gut feeling (from personal experience and knowledge) is that Jews are bad news. Ms Mercer is bad news. In the past European countries such as Spain expelled the Jews because they undermined the country. Surely America might consider the same.

    • Agree: Them Guys
  248. Mark31 says:
    @Malla

    Out of sincere curiosity: what book is the Ham fornication story in, which specifically references the Adamic and a pre-Adamic races?

    I’m loosely familiar with Biblical literature, but missed the references to Adamites.

    Yes, in general, I believe that the myths that detail the “sons of god” (or fallen angels) mixing with the “daughters of men” to create “Nephilim”, in both Genesis and Enoch, refers this process of new race creation whenever it occurs.

    Some mainstream religions, which I will not name here, stated (in their older literature) that the biblical flood’s purpose was to eradicate the results of race mixing from these unions. You can find this explicitly stated in some 19th century and early 20th century books.

    There is a lack of hominid mtDNA (female) lines in the human genetic pool:

    http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/ancient-dna-and-neanderthals/interbreeding

    We previously mentioned the lack of genetic contributions by Neanderthals into the modern human mtDNA gene pool.

    This means that, on the whole, modern human males did not go around impregnating hominid females.

    Most if not all intermixing, at least for the hybrids that survived, came from female modern humans mating with male hominids.

    What I believe that this one-sided inter-mixing implies is that the general process of hybridization was the rape of human females by hominid males.

    If voluntary intermixing were the common method, then there would be hominid mtDNA lines in the human genepool via male-human, female-hominid interbreeding. There are not.

    Note that the Biblical literature specifically warns against the voluntary mixing of what is implied to be human males with hominid females (thus passing on the genetic rights to Kingship to lower races, and in reality creating more competitive enemies), and that those offspring were destroyed by god.

    My personal view on this mythology:

    To gain a balanced view on this topic, as explored by Western religions both new and old, we need to look at the mythical nodes where female gods, demi-gods and other female figures are both representing aspects of relationships (childbirth, love, family, etc) and interacting with both gods and undesirables (specifically in Christian, Roman, Greek, and Mesopotamian religions such those of the Sumerians, Semites, and Egyptians).

    In my opinion, all such interaction has veiled or explicit inter-breeding connotations.

    In many traditional religions, a female is often seen as the “gate” to god (see the Catholic view of Mary the Virgin Mother).

    Whereby you can only access “god” (his genetics, stated or implied) through this female figure.

    In the Christian story there is a stated passing of genetics, through Mary (a female of a lesser race) to make a hybrid (half man, half “god”) who has the explicit symbolism of a King.

    This passing of genetics through the “gate”, from “god” to “man”, and creating a hybrid, indicates the symbolic beginning of another race (likely referencing either past events, or the world that Christianity wished to later create in disseminating purer human genetics around the globe).

    A lot of the time (especially in later religions), this Virginal Female “gate” figure will have a Whorish counterpart, sometimes depicted as a whore and sometimes merely more hedonistic and involved with “love” than the virginal / chaste figure (Mary the Virgin Mother vs. Marry Magdalene; Artemis vs. Aphrodite; Diana vs. Venus; Isis vs. Hathor, etc.)

    I believe that a religion’s view on both the gender of the primary God, as well as the nature (Virginal vs Whorish) of any primarily venerated female figure, has to do with whether or not a specific tribe is racially more human with lesser percentage or a more narrow band of hominid species admixture (generally with a strong sense of monarchy).

    Or a racially lesser tribe (intermixed with hominid genetics and likely to be more prone to egalitarian philosophies like democracy, because there is a lack of noble lineages and this form of government preferences the most common lineages opposite to nobility) whose majority of individuals will have male DNA lineages that will be of hominid origin. Likely to a higher percentage, a wide spectrum of hominid types in the admixture, or both.

    To wit:

    If I am of a lower race who wishes to access the better genetics of a more advanced race, then what I want is for their men (of their noble line – mythologically equivalent to Gods) to mate with my women. This creates a mixed race with hereditary rights to rulership of the nation who mixed with my lower race.

    By this method, pure Neanderthal lines could realize hybridization and come to rule pure Cro Magnid lines

    The men of a hypothetically lower race could mate with (or rape) the women of a better race , but that doesn’t pass the noble genetics of the better race into the lower race (thus not conferring the rights to Kingship, and also most indicative of Godhood).

    It only gains their female mtDNA.

    Thus, what I would want is a “gate” to their noble genetics, represented by one of my tribal females, to have sex with one of the noble male “gods” (a “Virgin” in that she doesn’t have sex with one of my tribe, but instead only with a “god” of another genetic species).

    If I am of a better race, and wish to enhance a lower race without politically threatening my race , or merely wish for a best case scenario if genetics are to pass outside of my tribe but not due to my will, the last thing that I would want is to pass on the male genetics of my tribe. If I do not do so, then there is no genetic claim to my throne outside of my tribe. Hence, the biblical warnings of catastrophe (the Nephilim and the Flood) when this occurs.

    If I am of a better tribe, and one of my females decides to willingly procreate outside of my tribe and with a lower race, then she takes on the “Whore” mythological archetype that is opposite to the virginal archetype that she would take on if procreating with a male of a better race (both of which are sometimes said to exist in all women). Depending on who a woman mates with (God or lesser being), she takes on the archetype of Virgin or Whore.

    Thus, the contrasting Virgin-Whore archetypes in most ancient religions. The contrast becoming more apparent in relatively newer religions (ie: Greek, Roman, Christian) that wrote more complex mythologies.

    The Ionians (Greeks) primarily worshipped a Goddess, and were prone to democracy. Modern researhers consider their society to be “too semitic” to stand in for reliable Indo-European historical research. They were the enemies of the Persians and the Romans. They were likely mixed race, worshipping the “gate” that conferred better genetics to their race. The term “Ion” is etymologically related to Eo (noble), Ian, John, Yew, Yah and Yahweh.

    I’ve seen Orthodox Jews refer to their god with female pronouns.

    Kali is the female Hindu God of destruction.

    I see females, and their veneration, as a double edged sword. As I believe that the ancients did.

    One aspect of the female is as the Virgin Mother, responsible for all life and initially passing on the genetics that made us human. She procreated with a God.

    The other aspect of the female is her Whorish open-ness to other species. Symbolized by the open vagina that envelopes everything.

    I believe that the implication is that females aren’t reliably loyal or discerning enough to be trusted with maintaining the boundaries that maintain civilization. In this aspect, she is a destroyer at the same time that she is a life giver.

    I believe that the veneration of female gods, or females themselves (feminism), is meant to create such an “open vagina” society that dominates by way of absorbing everything that can come to it. It doesn’t impose rules, but disintegrates them in favor of absorbing everything. It cannot be undermined by revolution because it is revolution. It is anti-fragile. It is built to absorb every entrant while continuing to grow.

    I do believe that this is the most effective and dominant form of control, which likely speaks to the mythological power of the feminine (likely seen as stronger than the masculine). However, it is control via destruction of the people who enter into it. I believe that it represents the slavers society.

    A male directed society (theologically and otherwise) builds boundaries and imparts rules (symbolized by an insertion of the penis) onto individuals. It creates order and a pleasant place to live for those who can follow the rules. But it imposes itself on individuals who are forced to be receptive. This seems to be the better society, but the more fragile society (prone to revolutionary subversion).

    • Replies: @Mark35
    , @Malla
  249. Mark35 says:
    @Mark31

    See Prometheus stealing the ‘fire” (genetics) from “heaven” (the noble race – pure humans), to give to “humans” (hominids), and being forever punished by the Gods (pure humans) for it.

    To me, the story seems like an allegory for the rape of a noble (pure human) woman.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus

    In Greek mythology, Prometheus (/prəˈmiːθiːəs/; Greek: Προμηθεύς, pronounced [promɛːtʰeús], meaning “forethought”)[1] is a Titan, culture hero, and trickster figure who is credited with the creation of man from clay, and who defies the gods by stealing fire and giving it to humanity, an act that enabled progress and civilization. Prometheus is known for his intelligence and as a champion of mankind.

    Franz Kafka wrote a short piece on Prometheus, outlining what he saw as his perspective on four aspects of his myth:

    According to the first, he was clamped to a rock in the Caucasus for betraying the secrets of the gods to men.

    note: the Caucus is where the Neanderthals lived that are responsible for most of the hominid admixture in Europeans.

    The story of Lucifer is the same.

    If you read the one credible English translation of the Zohar (Kabbalah), it details how the Lucifer-Mars was riding on the back of the snake in Eden and impregnated Eve. She “gave into temptation” and gained “knowledge of the gods” (genetics through sex). Thus, Eve is a direct parallel to the Virgin Mary.

    Cain and Abel were not the offspring of Adam, but of Mars-Lucifer and Eve. Mars is mythologically seen as the progenitor of all Cro Magnids / Europeans – as you can see if you read the Jewish version (the tempter god lives in the seventh heaven and rules the fifth – or Mars), research the German mythological origins (Tw, Tiw, Tuisto), or merely consult the Wikipedia for Roman mythological origins where it is stated that Mars is their progenitor. Christ is a mirror of the characteristics of both Cain’s lineage (Kingship, the physical body arising into heaven, etc) and Abel (Shepherd), and it is implied that his Father is the tempter God (Mars is Ares (Aryan) or the Ram, and Christ “the lamb (son) of god”). The father of a lamb is a ram.

    John the Baptist (John the Forerunner) is implied to be Mars (the Ram) who is the Father of Christ. Though, I hold that he isn’t meant to serve as the physical Father of Christ, but as a physical allegory of the Father (Mars) on Earth.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  250. Hrw-500 says:

    I wonder where South Africa would be today if Hendrik Verwoerd had survived and not killed by Dimitri Tsafendas?

    Speaking of Dimitri Tsafendas, is it ok to show these memes?

    https://imgflip.com/i/2h4zt4

    https://imgflip.com/i/2h5008

  251. Mark54 says:
    @jim jones

    It is very likely that the Dutch Boers are your species superiors.

  252. Bliss says:
    @Bombercommand

    The “black ancient Egypt” gibberish is easily debunked. First, there is genetics. DNA from numerous Pharoahs has been found to be the same as present day Egyptians of the Nile Delta, so you’re dead wrong Bliss. There is no SubSaharan DNA in Egyptians until 700AD

    Unfortunately for you the above only proves that you are just another hopelessly deluded, lying retard. Who belongs in an insane asylum.

    1. The only legitimate DNA test of Egyptian Pharaohs found the Y-DNA Haplogroup E1b1a which is African:

    http://ethiohelix.blogspot.com/2012/12/ramesses-iii-belonged-to-ydna.html

    2. Some 12 centuries before “700 AD” the Greek historian Herodotus described the ancient Egyptians as akin to Ethiopians. No one ever compared the physical appearance of ancient Egyptians to even the neighboring Levantines much less Greeks. Forget about Scots or Germans or other northern european barbarians, they don’t even exist in the Bible which was written thousands of years after Egyptian civilization began in the Deep South.

    3. The numerous colorful paintings from ancient Egypt, best preserved in the tomb murals, depict a people who would have been forced to drink from the black fountains, and forced to pee in the black rest rooms, of Jim Crow America:

    tomb paintings ancient egypt

    • Replies: @Malla
  253. Malla says:
    @Mark31

    Hmm that is some deep stuff….

    Out of sincere curiosity: what book is the Ham fornication story in, which specifically references the Adamic and a pre-Adamic races?
    I’m loosely familiar with Biblical literature, but missed the references to Adamites.

    From Curse of Canaan by Eustace Mullins

    “Having been warned by God of the impending catastrophe, Noah succeeded in building the Ark,
    one of the greatest engineering feats of all time. Weighing 36,750 tons, it was built entirely of
    wood. It was 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet in depth. On this Ark, God commanded
    Noah to “take of every living thing of all flesh.” Because of the limited space on the Ark, there
    could be no possibility of further reproduction of these species during their time aboard, and
    God commanded that no intercourse should take place. This commandment was violated by an
    inhabitant of the Ark, Ham, the second son of Noah. Ham had intercourse with a preAdamite
    woman on the Ark, a dark skinned person. Their offspring was a black son named Cush, who
    became the symbol of Ethiopia.

    Noah was dismayed when he learned that his son had violated God’s commandment, because he
    knew that retribution would come. After the Flood had subsided, and life on earth went back to
    its usual routine, Noah continued to be haunted by his fears. The subsequent occurrences have
    since had dire consequences for all of mankind. In the Bible, it appears as somewhat of a riddle,
    since the characters are identified and misidentified in sequential verses. Neither the exact
    sequence of events, their explanation, or the identification of the principals can be followed as it
    appears in Genesis, possibly due to mistranslations or editing over the centuries.

    Although life on earth had resumed its pre-Deluge felicity, Noah continued to be distressed by
    Ham’s transgression. So vexed was he that he drank too much wine, and he lay exposed in his
    drunkenness. ”

    What is very interesting is that Israelis use the word “Cushi” as a n-word against black people.

    Before now I thought that the Negroid are a pure race but now we see that they are mixed with early hominids and I suddenly remembered this book.

    Noah would have three sons. it is believed that Ham and his descendants would go to Egypt and the lands beyond (Africa), Shem to the Middle East and Jasphet to Ukraine and beyond (Central Asia) and would form what we call the Aryans. It seems the flood did not affect East Asians and they are out of this story at least. Some believe Jasphets are East Asians but most likely were Aryans.
    One of the many reasons Noah was chosen was that he was ‘ pure in his generations’ or pure breed or unmixed.
    Noah’s boat landed in Mt. Ararat near the Caucasus mountains and hence White people are called Caucasians however people from the Middle East and Indian subcontinent too come under that term because we all share the basic Caucasian skull structure different from the Mongoloids and Negroids.
    More so genetic research on the Steepe Aryans show them going from Turkey to Ukraine and Central Asia.

    A lot of that is explained in this video

    Not so Chosen People Part 1
    Check out the other parts of the series too

    • Replies: @Them Guys
  254. Okechukwu says:
    @Bombercommand

    Okechukwu, avoiding the substance of my comment won’t help you, especially if you avoid it by telling another goofy whopper. You do not have a white wife that looks like a supermodel, you have not ” dated and fucked” any “white girls and women”, and no ” white girls have chased after you since grade school”. Your stories are as false as the gibberish about an alleged “black ancient Egypt”. And remember, Okechukwu, you are the one who brought up the subject of interracial porn.

    Here’s a moron who truly believes that it’s impossible for a black man to date or marry a white women. You how do wonder how this idiot is able to function and perform day to day tasks.

    Ladies and gentleman, I present to you a superb example of the stupidity and disconnection from reality of white supremacists.

  255. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    “Much to my amazement,” Dr. Grine said in an interview, “the skull linked very closely with those from Europe at the time and not with South African remains 15,000 years on.”

    It is yet another proof of your intellectual dishonesty that you conveniently neglected to include what Dr. Grine said in the very next sentence: Dr. Grine said these modern humans probably originated in East Africa, which is rich in fossils of ancestors of the species, and had then moved into Eurasia and also south to the tip of Africa.

    You are a complete idiot for thinking that means Europeans were in South Africa thousands of years before Africans. Show us a legitimate link that says anything that supports the insane bullshit you are so desperately clinging to. Every legitimate link concludes that the Hofmeyr skull confirms the Out of Africa theory. The Khoisan and other africans, the mongoloids of Asia, the aborigines of Australia (your ancestors), the Cheddar Man of Britain and all other “modern humans” are descended from these “modern humans” from Africa.

    From that NY Times link:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/11/science/11cnd-skull.html

    From a new analysis of a human skull discovered in South Africa more than 50 years ago, scientists say they have obtained the first fossil evidence establishing the relatively recent time for the dispersal of modern Homo sapiens out of Africa. The migrants appeared to have arrived at their new homes in Asia and Europe with the distinct and unmodified heads of Africans.

    An international team of researchers reported today that the age of the South African skull, which they dated at about 36,000 years old, coincided with the age of and closely resembled the skulls of humans who were then living in Europe and the far eastern parts of Asia, even Australia.

    Some scientists, on the other hand, have contended that the migration could have begun as early as 100,000 years ago and that in the intervening time, contact with more archaic populations like the Neanderthals could have produced recognizable changes in what became the modern humans of Eurasia. But no scientists in the migration controversy have disputed that ancestors of the human species originated in Africa.

    In a report in Friday’s issue of the journal Science, a research team led by Frederick E. Grine of Stony Brook University in New York concluded that the South African skull provided critical corroboration of the archaeological and genetic evidence indicating that humans in fully modern form originated in sub-Saharan Africa and migrated, almost unchanged, to populate Europe and Asia. Dr. Grine and his colleagues said in an announcement by Stony Brook that the skull was the first fossil evidence “in agreement with the out-of-Africa theory, which predicts that humans like those that inhabited Eurasia should be found in sub-Saharan Africa around 36,000 years ago.”

    • Replies: @Malla
  256. Malla says:
    @Mark35

    John the Baptist (John the Forerunner) is implied to be Mars (the Ram) who is the Father of Christ.

    Christ ushered in the age of Pisces which followed by the earlier age of Aries, maybe that has to do anything with John the Baptist as Ram. Moses (Mar-ses) ushered in the age of Aries.

    Cain and Abel were not the offspring of Adam, but of Mars-Lucifer

    Interesting but I though Lucifer was connected to Venus, maybe I am wrong

    Jewish version (the tempter god lives in the seventh heaven and rules the fifth – or Mars), research the German mythological origins (Tw, Tiw, Tuisto), or merely consult the Wikipedia for Roman mythological origins where it is stated that Mars is their progenitor.

    Interesting Mars is called Mangal in North Indian languages and Tuesday (Tiw’s day, the Norse Germanic God of War’s day) is called Mangalwar, which means the day of Mangal, the day of the God of War. Roman Mars is equivalent to Norse Germanic Tiw and Indian Mangal — All Gods of War. All have the same day on Tuesday.

    Anyways thanks for all this information. Brilliant. I learnt a lot.

  257. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    Your IQ is definitely below 32. You are perhaps the dumbest fool I have ever seen in the world.
    Of course it was from Africa but the Africans in this case already looked like Europeans. They were not negroids, those Africans had nothing to do with your ancestors. You are getting confused because you have low IQ and because when we use the word African, you think of a black Negroid. Nothing can be further from the truth. The Africans in question here looked like Europeans. The black Negroid had not formed yet. AFRICAN DOES NOT MEAN BLACK NEGROID. There were many races living in Africa concurrently.
    Those Africans who left Africa were a different branch that would later become black Negroids. They were Africans of a different type and looked like Europeans facially (we do not know about skin colour yet).

    • Replies: @Bliss
  258. Malla says:
    @Mark35

    Check this out. Great video.

    TGI-20_ Noah’s flood debunked – The Nephilim – w Pastor Eli James & Pastor Steve

  259. Truth says:
    @Bombercommand

    he first, the white girl was a friend, she got together with this Kang, a failed petty criminal, in November 1994, by February 1995 he was dead in her bed of an overdose of morphine pills, good riddance.

    Did you finally agree to go out with you after that harrowing experience, or were you still in the “friend” zone?

  260. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:

    Some commenters here would be very happy to know that

    “Margaret Thatcher believed South Africa should be a ‘whites-only state’, says UK’s former chief diplomat”

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/margaret-thatcher-south-africa-whites-only-state-patrick-wright-a8171356.html

    and here

    https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/

    a very good article how “new labour” is transforming Margaret-Thatcher in a hero who was always against the evil regime and Jeremy Corbyn in a racist fighting FOR Apartheid and who was always an “anti-semite”

    • Replies: @Malla
  261. Truth says:
    @Malla

    Yes they are quite thick headed. Okechukwu is still OK.

    Hey awesome, the Bromance is back on.

    Dawg, when you guys meet, I can almost see the party now; you’re going to end up hiding out from the mob in a penthouse suite in Vegas filled with midget strippers, professional wrestlers, exotic Central Asian antelope, and frisbees full of cocaine on the table, but the next day the two of you will save a poor, Mexican boys club from greedy investors!

    • Replies: @Malla
  262. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    The only legitimate DNA test of Egyptian Pharaohs found the Y-DNA Haplogroup E1b1a which is African:

    http://ethiohelix.blogspot.com/2012/12/ramesses-iii-belonged-to-ydna.html

    That is so 2012. Latest genetic studies came out with very different results.

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/810888/ancient-egyptian-dna-genetics-turkish-european-african

    A NEW DNA analysis of Ancient Egyptians shows they were more Turkish and European than African

    “The team of scientists has recovered and analysed ancient DNA from Egyptian mummies dating from approximately 1400 BC to 400 AD – and they discovered they were genetically similar to people from the Mediterranean.

    Researchers from the University of Tuebingen and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, conducted the first study to establish a proper genetic database to study the ancient past.

    The study, published in Nature Communications, found that modern Egyptians share more ancestry with Sub-Saharan Africans than ancient Egyptians did.

    The study found that ancient Egyptians were most closely related to ancient populations in the Levant (modern day Syria, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon), and were also closely related to Neolithic populations from the Anatolian Peninsula and Europe.

    https://uni-tuebingen.de/en/newsfullview-landingpage/article/the-first-genome-data-from-ancient-egyptian-mummies.html

    The First Genome Data from Ancient Egyptian Mummies
    The study found that ancient Egyptians were most closely related to ancient populations in the Levant, and were also closely related to Neolithic populations from the Anatolian Peninsula and Europe. “The genetics of the Abusir el-Meleq community did not undergo any major shifts during the timespan of around one and a half millennia we studied, suggesting that the population remained genetically relatively unaffected by foreign conquest and rule,” says Wolfgang Haak, group leader at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena. The data shows that modern Egyptians share approximately 8% more ancestry on the nuclear level with Sub-Saharan African populations than with ancient Egyptians. “This suggests that an increase in Sub-Saharan African gene flow into Egypt occurred within the last 1,500 years,” explains Stephan Schiffels, group leader at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena. Possible causal factors may have been improved mobility down the Nile River, increased long-distance trade between Sub-Saharan Africa and Egypt, and the trans-Saharan slave trade that began approximately 1,300 years ago.

    Personally I do not care a damn if the ancient Egyptians were Black, Brown or White or Martian.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  263. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    Margaret Thatcher believed South Africa should be a ‘whites-only state’

    How can one have a White only state? Either you break South Africa into pieces and give the black tribes their homelands etc…. (which the Afrikaners wanted to do but the “world community” would have none of it) and get White republics out or you continue the Union with or without Aparthied.

    a very good article how “new labour” is transforming Margaret-Thatcher in a hero who was always against the evil regime and Jeremy Corbyn in a racist fighting FOR Apartheid and who was always an “anti-semite”

    LOL. What can you trust now a days.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  264. Malla says:
    @Truth

    Dawg, when you guys meet, I can almost see the party now; you’re going to end up hiding out from the mob in a penthouse suite in Vegas filled with midget strippers, professional wrestlers, exotic Central Asian antelope, and frisbees full of cocaine on the table, but the next day the two of you will save a poor, Mexican boys club from greedy investors!

    LOL. You should direct movies. How about the next ‘Hangover’ movie?
    Nah, I would not suggest it, Hollywood is Satanic, better stay away.

  265. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    What a load of confused gibberish. Did you blow a fuse in your brain or what?

    This Dravidian crackpot, has brainwashed himself with 19th century pseudoscientific and pseudobiblical nordicism. It is truly bizarre to see a black Dravidian identifying so religiously with nordicism. Go see a psychiatrist you loony tune.

    Btw, in the Bible the Egyptians, Nubians and Libyans of Africa are the descendants of Ham. How do you reconcile that with the crackpot racist religion you learned at Stormfront?

    Those Africans who left Africa were a different branch that would later become black Negroids.

    What? Are you nuts? That actually makes sense to you?

    Of course it was from Africa but the Africans in this case already looked like Europeans.

    You numb skull, there were no humans in Europe when these Africans, likely East Africans, took over that continent. In other words the first human Europeans were Africans.

    The Hofmeyr skull from South Africa closely resembled skulls from East Asia and Australia of that time as well. Does that mean “the Africans in this case already looked like” mongoloids and australoids as well?

    • Replies: @Malla
  266. Thatcher also said that “Mexicans will be the ruination of America”.

    That was in the eighties when she was in Texas.

    She was right.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  267. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    What a load of confused gibberish.

    Yeah it is heavy stuff for a person with IQ 31. But have patience….

    Bible the Egyptians, Nubians and Libyans of Africa are the descendants of Ham.

    So? Ham was the son of Noah.

    What? Are you nuts? That actually makes sense to you?

    That is what actually happened.

    You numb skull, there were no humans in Europe when these Africans,

    “Instead, the skull was found to be quite distinct from all recent Africans, including the Bushmen, she said, and it has “a very close affinity” with fossil specimens of Europeans living in the Upper Paleolithic, the period best known for advanced stone tools and cave art.

    ikely East Africans, took over that continent.

    Those Africans were not your branch. Besides that they did not look like Negroids.

    The Hofmeyr skull from South Africa closely resembled skulls from East Asia and Australia of that time as well. Does that mean “the Africans in this case already looked like” mongoloids and australoids as well?

    They definitely did not look like Negroids.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  268. Fran800 says:
    @Watching

    Anyone usurping land and rights of another people Is a criminal interloper? Really? The most monstrous example of this is the Muslims, first the conquest of about half the Roman Empire, including North Africa and most of Spain. Then, the relentless onslaught of Turks against the Byzantine Empire in the East, with the enslavement of Greeks and Cypriots, Armenians, Bulgarians, Serbs, Romanians, with hundreds of years warfare against Germans, Italians, etc. in the West, Russians in the East. Nothing in the world is more vile than the Arabs and the Turks.

  269. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    Skin colour is not the only difference in between Negroids and Europeans. There are many other differences.

    Like what? Cite the differences.

    Forensics 101: Race Determination Based on the Skull

    Well you’ve failed Forensics 101 because it’s impossible to infer race from bones with any degree of accuracy. Given a jumble of bones from people of different races no one will be able to identify which bones belong to which race. There are theories and then there is practice.

    Forensic anthropologists do computer modeling to try to determine the race of skeletal remains. The leading software program for this purpose is something called Fordisc. It uses craniometric data to deduce the race of the deceased. But it is wildly inaccurate.

    Determining the ancestry of unidentified human remains is a major task for bioarchaeologists and forensic anthropologists. Here, we report an assessment of the computer program that has become the main tool for accomplishing this task. Called Fordisc, the program determines ancestry through discriminant function analysis of cranial measurements. We evaluated the utility of Fordisc with 200 specimens of known ancestry. We ran the analyses with and without the test specimen’s source population included in the program’s reference sample, and with and without specifying the sex of the test specimen. We also controlled for the possibility that the number of variables employed affects the program’s ability to attribute ancestry. The results of the analyses suggest that Fordisc’s utility in research and medico-legal contexts is limited. Fordisc will only return a correct ancestry attribution when an unidentified specimen is more or less complete, and belongs to one of the populations represented in the program’s reference samples. Even then Fordisc can be expected to classify no more than 1 per cent of specimens with confidence

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827999/

    Alan Goodman, a distinguished biological anthropologist, says the following:

    Like some of the other questions, especially the one on bone marrow, we have to look at the assumption that is embedded in the question, which is the idea that forensic investigators actually are good at telling an individual’s race from their bones or from a fragment of their DNA. I can very clearly say that this assumption is incorrect.

    Initially there were a number of forensic studies in which they tried to separate individuals into different so-called races depending on what they were looking at in the bones – size and shapes of skulls mostly. And they thought they had it. But when any of these studies has been replicated, looking at individuals from a different area or a different time, the results, sadly, are little better than random assignment.

    I think the reason why this is true is very interesting. It really smacks at how fluid social definitions of race are and even how fluid, sometimes, biologies are. Biology can change, or at least phenotypes can change, from generation to generation. So if you did an initial study on say, bones of so-called blacks and whites in Cleveland, and then do a study of so-called blacks, whites, and Native Americans in Arizona, you actually find that the blacks in Arizona look different from the blacks in Cleveland. And the whites, in fact, look so different that one could even assign them into a different “race.” In the same way, maybe, we could say Japanese immigrants look different once they come to the United States versus when they were in Japan.

    http://www.pbs.org/race/000_About/002_04-experts-01-09.htm

    Listen dumbo. The OOA population were not a subset of the ancestors of Negroids. Negroids have higher diversity because of interbreeding with primitive archaic humanoids.

    This is junk pseudoscience gleaned from white nationalist morons who play “scientist” on the Internet. The actual scientific consensus is clear and couldn’t be further removed from your proposition.

    The video cites some latest scientific research.

    No it doesn’t. You’re lying.

    • Replies: @Malla
  270. Them Guys says:
    @Malla

    Malla and Mark….What the bible story says is that, Ham went into Noahs tent while Noah and his wife, aka all three sons mother, slept as noah was drunken on his own wine. It states Ham “Saw his fathers Nakedness”….Which from what I read of seems to indicate that word of, Nakedness from ancient Hebrew wordings actually meant…Ham had Sex with…His own Mother! IE Ham Is the original MF’er!….Ergo when the other two sons told Noah what happened with Ham inside tent. Noah placed a curse upon Ham, but the curse applied to Hams Son born from that son + mother sex act.

    Weather the curse caused hams son to have black skin? No real biblical verses support that as fact.

    But based upon later ongoing verses that describe which future sons each of noahs three sons had, where each grandson went to live etc seems to indicate a reality of the black skin equals that curse.

    There is also the issue of Cain Adams first born son who murdered his brother Able…..Cain too got severly cursed by God for that murder. Cain traveled to many places and set up tribes and cities everywhere he went to….resulting in a group called, Cainites…Or Kinites. Which had inherited the same curse or dna bads from cain. Basically a problem people wherever found.In Future became Jews? maybe so. Plus, it seems that Eve had Twin sons, cain & able, and Eve got knocked up by sex with Lucifer the devil angel, with son Cain, while son Able was Adams real son, hence able=good and cain=evil bad. Only After episode of Lucifer & Eve in garden, after that, is when Lucifer was punished by God to crawl on his belly like a Snake and like a snake serphant eat dust all rest of his life. So maybe thats reason some call a certain Tribe as Lizard or Serphant peoples eh? But satan as a serphant was not yet a snake or snake like creature til After cursed to be by God.

    There also is TWO creation storys in book of genesis…Only in creation story #2 is Adam even mentioned or named….it may mean that the first creation era, is where Non Adamic people were prior to adam created….They are who got dna messed up via evil satanic bad angels. Causing for the great flood to wipe out all messed up dna mixed and race mixed peoples etc.

    And while yes in genesis it states that God chained up those evil angels in hell, awaiting their great judgment day, Satan wasn’t chained up, and somewheres in other bible parts, it discuses the issue of fallen angels doing what was done, it also states that even After the Flood, when mankind began anew again thru Noahs three sons, That even with prior fallen angels locked away for good…That same scenario happened again! Ie: Again fallen angels created mixed race and dna humans same as done prior. So…It means if true, that even now today and all along the world has had peoples that descended from some type mixed dna and mixed race Others. Is that part reason Christ told Jews and their Talmudic Rabbi leaders that, “You are Of Your Father Satan, and Like him You will do Thefts, Lies and Murders….etc…In book of, John chap. 8 vs. 44 ?

    And when Christ told John in book of Revelation, first several chapters dealing with the seven churches of Christ….In Rev. Chap. 2 vs 9 and again in chap 3 vs 9, “You have those among you that call themselves Jews, but are Not Jews and are really Imposters and Of the Synagogue of Satan”

    And last verse, in Rev 3 vs 9 speaks of how in end of game senarios, last days era etc…Christ as God in the flesh, once returned, will “Make those who call themselves a Jew but are Imposters and Of the Synagouge of Satan, to come before You (christians) and Bow down on their knees before you to aknowledge that it is You (christians) Whom I really Loved and who are My chosen peoples…And I shall also make those imposter Jews Serve You (christians). I Paraphrased of course, but very close to actual verses……Consider how all that totally rejects and refutes most everything Jews claim of being chosens, and More-Equals, and a super-special-class/race of Jews compared to Goyim gentiles and especially christan others, eh….A total 180-degree opposite of most Jew claims.

    Yet today we still see a vast super majority of christian folks who either Never read any of those verses, or Have read but fully refuse to believe those bible parts…And most of them are the same ones who always bible thump to all others and other chrstians that…”Sola scripture” aka every single bible word Is Gods own words and every word Means exactly what it says.

    Which just shows they have No idea or comprehension of how many bible words or verses are worded to create an anology of other things etc…Not sure if I wrote proper explaination there? But basically I am saying that No not every individual word of entire bible means Only as wrote and sounds like…Example=…Some verses describe a 24 Hr Day as being a representative of an entire 7 day week of time…Each 24 hr day= one full 7 day week of time…Other places a Day equals a Thousand years!….As in when asked how soon or when will He return? Christ said…”in Two Days or Less” which meant Two Thousand years or less….So if each word means one same certain thing always? Which is sola scripture correct? a day equas a week? or day is a thousand years equal?

    Apostate phony christians today have a simple solution…They just switch it to mean whatever best proves whatever they claim as truth!….Yesterday it meant a day is a week, next month to prove how their fanatical worship of israel and Jews is good and proper, it may mean a day equals a thousand years…OR maybe a day is,,, Just a 24 hr day this time around!….See how that apostate falsehoods stuff functions?…….Over 1,000 denominations and names, over 300,000 Pastors within the usa today, and Every Pastor or Preacherman is His very Own, Pope top authority!

    Any questions as to why and how usa christianity got so royally fucked up in first place? 300,000 teachers/pastors, most are Judaizering self-Popes, and while most are on same bible pages…They arrive at a few hundred different interpretations of same page verses true meanings.

    Main thing none hardley differ on is…”Ok folks! Time to Throw your $$$ money against the Wall, and whatever money Sticks to wall, God will keep it!….But the money which Falls to the Floor….I, your Esteemed Passda Loot, will Keep it!…..Because god only wants good money, and all bad evil money that falls to the floor, I will keep so to spend it all on only Good stuff! which turns it back into good money again! so Throw your moneys at that wall folks, and Dig Deep in those wallets, purses and popckets! Dig Deep and donate Big so’s gods gonna bless you greatly! (while pastor heads to nearby cadilac car dealership for a brand new caddy car via all that Bad, fell to floor cash!) Hallaluyah! and all that stuff.

    • Replies: @Malla
  271. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    they did not look like Negroids.

    They were adventurous black Africans who were the first humans in Europe, Asia and Australia. They certainly didn’t look like modern Europeans because they weren’t white. White skin evolved more than 20,000 years after black Africans settled in Europe. Get it, ignoramus?

    So? Ham was the son of Noah.

    So, the Egyptians were negroids according to your biblical based world view:

    the story of Ham’s fornication with a pre Adamite woman on the ship of Noah may be an indication of the formation of Negroids.

    Before now I thought that the Negroid are a pure race but now we see that they are mixed with early hominids

    How do you reconcile that with the nordicist claim that the ancient Egyptians were white Caucasians? Who do you believe? Your God or some part-Neanderthal racist crackpot from the 19th century? You can’t swing both ways.

    Btw, there is no evidence of African admixture with hominids (such as Neanderthals), but on the other hand it is a fact that Indians are actually products of admixture of the humans who came out of Africa with the black hominids of Asia (Denivosans being one of them). How does that fit into your narrative?

    Lol. I knew were a whack job from the get go, but damn, you are even nuttier than I thought. What a waste of my time.

    • Replies: @Malla
  272. Bliss says:
    @Malla

    A NEW DNA analysis of Ancient Egyptians shows they were more Turkish and European than African

    Only an idiot would think that DNA study reflects the reality of Ancient Egypt, much less that it trumps the DNA analysis that revealed that Egyptian Pharaohs had African Y-DNA.

    Because it is from one site from a time period which includes numerous centuries when Egypt was no longer ruled by Egyptians and was overrun by foreigners including Greeks and Romans from Southern Europe. The mummies are not proven to be of native Egyptians.

    On the other hand the Egyptianness of the Pharaohs of the Ramesside Period is indisputable and they were found to have the Y-DNA Haplogroup E1b1a which is also indisputably african.

    Secondly, Herodotus interacted with actual Egyptians almost a thousand years before “400 AD” and reported their resemblance to Ethiopians, not to Europeans. No one who actually saw the ancient Egyptians ever compared them to even Levantines, much less Europeans.

    Anyways, I am not going to waste any more of my time on immoral, dishonest, mentally disturbed, low class (class=character) racist crackpots. Adios…

    • Replies: @Malla
  273. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    “How can one have a White only state? Either you break South Africa into pieces and give the black tribes their homelands etc…”

    “How can one have a White only state? Either you break South Africa into pieces and give the black tribes their homelands etc…”

    Craig Murray:

    What Thatcher favoured was P W Botha’s “Bantustans” or “Homelands policy”, under which an ethnically defined, whites only state possessing all of South Africa’s wealthy cities and ports and the best mineral and agricultural resources, would exist alongside a number of impoverished “independent states” housing different tribes, from which a low paid workforce could commute daily to white areas (or live there temporarily under passes). That was the planned endgame of apartheid, and a number of such “states” were created – South Africa actually declared four “Bantustans” as independent countries. Thatcher hankered after their recognition, particularly Boputhatswana.

    The “Homelands policy” is of course identical to the “two state solution” which the neo-cons propose for Palestine, with an apartheid ethnically defined Israel holding all the main resources next to impoverished pockets of Palestinians in an “independent state” commuting in to provide a cheap labour force.

    • Replies: @Malla
  274. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    “She was right.”

    Maybe. Maybe not.

    But there is a very easy solution to the “Mexican Problem.”

    USA should just give back to Mexico all the land they stole and then expel all Mexicans.

    Maybe Trump won’t even need to build the wall.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Malla
  275. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    Just a few

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004623/

    Ethnic differences in bone geometry between White, Black and South Asian men in the UK

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2593128/

    Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19226647

    Understanding race and human variation: why forensic anthropologists are good at identifying race.

    Well you’ve failed Forensics 101 because it’s impossible to infer race from bones with any degree of accuracy.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26270337

    Determination of Race from the Skeleton through Forensic Anthropological Methods.

    Metric and morphological techniques employed by forensic anthropologists for determination of race are reviewed. Included are several studies which examine cranial morphological techniques such as presence of the oval window of the inner ear, which occurs more frequently in Whites than in Native Americans; or the shape of the alveolar region which distinguishes between Asian, African, and North American Indian groups. A table of common cranial morphologic traits is presented. Metric techniques have also been used to determine race from the skull. Regression equations derived from measurements of the cranial base indicate a 70-90% accuracy for classifying Blacks and Whites, while multivariate discriminant functions for discriminating Blacks, Whites, and Native Americans correctly classify 82.6% of the males and 88.1% of the females. FORDISC, a computer program developed at the University of Tennessee, is another metric technique reviewed that not only distinguishes Whites, Blacks, and Native Americans but also male Hispanics, Chinese, and Vietnamese. Platycnemia, femoral curvature and other morphological attributes of the post-cranial skeleton may be used in support of a racial determination; however, several investigators have turned to post-cranial elements not only to use in support of cranial findings but for use when cranial information is not available. As a result, several discriminant functions from measurements of the pelvis, femur, tibia or combinations of these elements have been developed. Accuracy for these techniques varies from 57% to 95%, depending on the sample and technique used. Other aspects of the femur, such as the diameter of the neck, height of the intercondylar notch and femoral curvature, have been measured for assessment of race.

    From Forensic Anthropology: What Bones Can Tell Us
    John K. Lundy, PhD, DABFA

    My experience has been that the skull, especially the facial region, is the most diagnostic for
    racial attribution. Nonmetric racial features of the skull have been outlined by Rhine13
    and include such features as overall shape of the skull, shape of the nasal region, shape of the
    orbits, degree of protrusion of the jaw or prognathism, shape of the lower jaw, and certain features
    of the teeth, to name a few. Cranial and facial measurements diagnostic for race have been reported in a volume on assessing race from the skeleton, as have postcranial methods for determining race.

    This is junk pseudoscience gleaned

    All of the data are from researched paper, you low IQ moron,

    No it doesn’t. You’re lying.

    Are you blind?

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  276. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    Only an idiot would think that DNA study

    Says a low IQ Afrocentrist loser.

    “The genetics of the Abusir el-Meleq community did not undergo any major shifts during the timespan of around one and a half millennia we studied, suggesting that the population remained genetically relatively unaffected by foreign conquest and rule,

    Anyways, I am not going to waste any more of my time on immoral, dishonest, mentally disturbed, low class (class=character) racist crackpots. Adios…

    You were describing yourself? Are you not going to spend time with yourself? You do not want to? I am not surprised. Who can blame you?

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  277. @anonymous

    Mexicans would climb over the Oregon and California border the week it went back into Mexican hands because essentially Mexico is owned by a few European aristocrats or whites from Spain and France who became land-rich during colonial times.

    Mestizos are descended from rough Spanish soldiers and a few Spanish Gypsy prostitutes who screwed with all the Aztec Indians.

    Also you have Indians.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  278. Malla says:
    @Bliss

    They were adventurous black Africans who were the first humans in Europe, Asia and Australia.

    LOL. Your day dreams do not make up reality. Those Africans were not black Bantus. Black bantus were not formed yet when the event took place. The OOA population already had skull structures like Europeans but we do not know about their skin colour. Black Bantus were so ‘adventurous’ that they did not even settler Madagascar which so near to mainland Africa. It took Indonesian/Malay seafarers to travel from the other end of the Indian Ocean to come and settle Madagascar. However Black Bantus were adventurous enough to genocide pygmies and Khoi Sans across a large parts of Africa.

    They certainly didn’t look like modern Europeans because they weren’t white. White skin evolved more than 20,000 years after black Africans settled in Europe.

    They looked like Modern Europeans in skull structure more than Negroids. Albino Negroids do not look like Europeans. Blacks do not look like dark skinned mixed Caucasoid groups from the Middle East and Indian subcontinent. So skin colour is not relevant. Those Africans who settled Europe were not your genetic line.

    How do you reconcile that with the nordicist claim that the ancient Egyptians were white Caucasians? Who do you believe? Your God or some part-Neanderthal racist crackpot from the 19th century? You can’t swing both ways.

    Egypt remains a controversial topic. About the race that built it that is.
    But you forget one thing. Ham had many sons of whom Cush was just one.

    Btw, there is no evidence of African admixture with hominids (such as Neanderthals),

    There is. There are citations in the video.

    other hand it is a fact that Indians are actually products of admixture of the humans who came out of Africa with the black hominids of Asia

    Indians were formed by the mixture of ANI and ASI.

    http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp/2009/09/24/south-asians-as-a-hybrid-popul/


    Onge (ASI) are populations similar to Papuans, Aborigines. Virtually no pure ASI remains in India as they all got mixed up with Caucasoids.
    Pathas: Pathans from Afghanistan, vaish: vaishnav Hindu upper Caste, Meghawal: Lower Caste Hindu, Bhil: Jungle tribals or adivasis (literally translates to ‘aboriginal’ in North Indian languages).

    the Blue bars represent Middle Eastern farmers, who were Caucasians too.
    The Orange ones represent the Aryans, the Nordic horse ridding pastoralists, basically the cowboys of their day. Genetically related to North East Europeans like Slavs (Russians, Poles) and Baltics (Lithuanians)
    Yellow bars represent the original black aborigine hunter gatherers
    Pink bars represent North East Asians coming from the East across the Himalayas as well as South East Asian farmers.

    If there is hominid admixture in us, well i do not know. And if we have, well what can we do about it? We gotta live with it as yous gotta live with it.

    Lol. I knew were a whack job from the get go, but damn, you are even nuttier than I thought.

    LOL. That is rich coming from you. LOL

    What a waste of my time.

    Your whole life seems a waste to me.

  279. Malla says:
    @Them Guys

    After dealing with those childish lying dumbfarts (ochuku and blissi), finally a good informative post. Thank you for all this information Them Guys. Yes it is true, most of today’s pastors and priests are liars bought up by the Zionists. There have even have been Rabbis going to churches and instructing them what to preach. Imagine that!! Imagine a Protestant minister or a Catholic or Orthodox priest going to a synagogue to instruct what should be done in the Synagogue!!! Anyways what about ‘Adam’ meaning in Hebrew being ‘rosy cheeks’?

    • Agree: Them Guys
  280. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    “…because essentially Mexico is owned by a few European aristocrats or whites from Spain and France who became land-rich during colonial times.”

    That’s a possibility but POTUS will have moral authority to keep them out and Mexicans will have no other alternative to fight for independence and send “European aristocrats or whites” to Europe.

    Maybe even USA will learn from Mexico and ask (politely) Israel to give them Independence.

    Can you imagine Mexico and USA as independent and free countries ?

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  281. @anonymous

    All bastards are unruly and pissed-off and in the case of Mexicans they are the product of white men badly using Aztec/Red Indian women.

    Mexicans (And all Latin Americans) are a race of orphans overall.

    And the European Crollo stratum is so deeply ingrained that it cannot be overcome.

  282. bj says:

    “There can be little doubt President Trump will get no credit for this, but he had the courage, the power, and the political will to do something decisive, and the Trump “tweet” may yet go down in history as a seminal moment when a news flash in cyberspace saved a country from destroying itself.”

    http://takimag.com/article/africa-destroyed-poster-child-for-liberalism/#axzz5Q9AGqXzF

  283. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    “The genetics of the Abusir el-Meleq community did not undergo any major shifts during the timespan of around one and a half millennia we studied, suggesting that the population remained genetically relatively unaffected by foreign conquest and rule,”

    You should probably stick to racist pseudoscience and Jew-under-every-bed conspiracy theories. Do stay clear of science, genetics, history, archaeology, anthropology and Egyptology. Ancient Egypt was ancient even to those mummified individuals. Egypt of course was invaded and settled numerous times by Asiatic/Caucasoid non-Egyptians who founded their own dynasties. If future scientists were to conduct a genetic study American specimens that too would tell them almost nothing about its original (native) American inhabitants.

    Bliss is schooling your ignorant ass on this matter, but I’ll just add this disclaimer from the very scientists who studied the Abusir el-Meleq mummies.

    “However, we note that all our genetic data were obtained from a single site in Middle Egypt and may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt.”

    What’s more, peer reviews have been rather skeptical:

    Stephen Buckley, a research fellow at the University of York and an expert in ancient DNA, who was not affiliated with the study, agreed with the preliminary conclusions the researchers drew, but cautioned that this study may not reveal the full diversity of ancient Egypt.

    “What is less clear is how representative the population of Abusir el-Meleq is in terms of the ancient Egyptian population as a whole,” Buckley said. “I would perhaps expect a slightly different genetic picture further south given what we know of the cultural and political differences between north and south … with perhaps less of a Near Eastern connection further south.”

    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2017/05/31/egyptian-mummy-dna-population/#.W46xHOhKhPY

    Geneticist Iosif Lazaridis of Harvard Medical School in Boston, who studies how and when ancient populations mixed, calls the new results “a big accomplishment.” But he wonders how representative Abusir el-Meleq is of ancient Egypt as a whole. “Egypt is a big place,” he says. Other regions may have experienced its conquests in different ways, some perhaps with more genetic mixing.

    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/scientists-thought-ancient-egyptian-mummies-didn-t-have-any-dna-left-they-were-wrong

    The study has triggered anger among several Egyptian archaeologists who have questioned the results. Egyptologist Zahi Hawass described the studies as “hallucinations” and told Al-Ahram Weekly that they were not accurate for several reasons.

    The mummies that were subjected to the DNA tests dated to the Graeco-Roman period when the mummification process was very poor, he said. They also belonged to people who came from Italy or to Greeks who lived in ancient Egypt and not to native ancient Egyptians.

    How can the ancient Egyptians be genetically from Europe,” Hawass asked, adding that when the ancient Egyptians were busy building their civilisation Europe did not exist in civilisational terms.

    http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/9/40/270666/Heritage/Ancient-Egypt/Not-out-of-Africa.aspx

    • Replies: @Malla
  284. Okechukwu says:
    @Malla

    You do realize that practically anyone can publish on PubMed, right? Even an ill-informed, ill-educated joker like you. I would advise you to investigate their publication criteria.

    To give you an idea of how unreliable PubMed is, you link to a study there from 1995 that extols the virtues of Fordisc. Well, 20+ years is a very long time in science. As I noted earlier, more recent studies establish a whopping 1% success rate for Fordisc, and that’s under optimal conditions. Furthermore, this paper you linked makes reference to attributing Hispanic ancestry to bones. Well, there is no such race. There are black Hispanics, white Hispanics, indigenous Hispanics and varying hybrids thereof.

    All of the data are from researched paper, you low IQ moron.

    Then provide a list of those “researched papers” you lying cunt. I’m daring you here and now. Remember, with me you’re not dealing with an ignorant and delusional white supremacist — the kind that nod solemnly and pat you on the back whenever you launch into your tangled, often incoherent litany of lies and obfuscation.

    • Replies: @Malla
  285. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    whites only state possessing all of South Africa’s wealthy cities and ports and the best mineral and agricultural resources, would exist alongside a number of impoverished “independent states” housing different tribes,

    WRONG. The proposed homeland of Bophuthatswana by the Apartheid Regime. Bophuthatswana was the second Bantustan to be declared an independent state, after Transkei.
    Bophuthatswana had platinum mines, which accounted for two-thirds of the total platinum production in the Western world. it was all for the Swana people to enjoy. It was also rich in asbestos, granite, vanadium, chromium and manganese. Additional revenues came from the Sun City casino, which was a day trip from Johannesburg and Pretoria, where gambling was illegal under the National Party government, as it was throughout all of South Africa.

    This move was opposed by the “World community” and communist ANC. Basically globalist elites. Its President President Lucas Mangope opposed th communist ANC’s attempts to incorporate the homeland into the Union. the Commies wanted a united South Africa and were not ready to give independence to any group black or White. Zulus and ANC (Xhosa dominated) cadres fought a lot over this issue.
    Indeed the whole ANC vs national party ruled Apartheid was all a scam. the Afrikaner Broederbond the ideological party behind the National party was infiltrated by NWO secret societies. The ANC was already a NWO controlled commie party. So the whole thing Apartheid State vs ANC was a bit of a farce.

    Check out this video

    The Afrikaner Broederbond
    Check out at 25:09 where President of Bophuthatswana, Lucas Mangope says “For the good of South Africa, I want to expose the African National Congress (ANC) and the Government for what they are” and secret seals in between the national party government and the Communist party and ANC”. The ANC which was a de facto branch of the communist party was working with the Apartheid Party as the National party of South Africa as well as the Afrikaner Broederbond, were already infiltrated by freemasonic like globalists organisations. The whole ANC vs Apartheid struggle at one level was a hoax.
    Further at 26:04 President Lucas Mangope says that the Prime Minister of South Africa, Pieter Willem Botha (who the international lying propaganda media called an “evil right winged apartheid President” ) was taking orders from a Communist named Mac Maharaj, an Indian South African who was a card carrying member of the ANC. What? The evil racist Apartheid Leader taking his orders from Communists? How does that happen?

    Why was Mandela opposing an independent black homeland which the blacks in that homeland wanted it? Mandela and the ANC were just commie agents and the communists were the agents of the globalist elites. And they did not want the various groups in South Africa black or White getting their own homelands. They wanted a united South Africa for some agenda.
    The last great leader of South Africa was Hendrik Verwoerd, who was mysteriously assassinated. He was coming up with a lasting settlement with the Black Chiefs, a settlement agreeable to all sides. Of course the globalists and hence the communists and hence the ANC would not have wanted that. That is why he had to be eliminated.

    • Replies: @bj
    , @anonymous
  286. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    You do realize that practically anyone can publish on PubMed, right? Even an ill-informed, ill-educated joker like you. I would advise you to investigate their publication criteria.

    To give you an idea of how unreliable PubMed is, you link to a study there from 1995 that extols the virtues of Fordisc. Well, 20+ years is a very long time in science. As I noted earlier, more recent studies establish a whopping 1% success rate for Fordisc, and that’s under optimal conditions.

    basically this little kid is wailing that if you provide research papers which agrees with my agenda, it is correct. If not it is pseudo science.

    Then provide a list of those “researched papers” you lying cunt. I’m daring you here and now.

    Listen you stupid fool, all papers are referenced in the video. Every point has been cited. At the bottom of many slides we have the scientific papers, books cited. Everybody here at Unz can see the citations in the video slides. You do not want to see it.

    Remember, with me you’re not dealing with an ignorant and delusional white supremacist

    LOl. I am dealing with a low IQ delusional child.

    the kind that nod solemnly and pat you on the back whenever you launch into your tangled, often incoherent litany of lies and obfuscation.

    LOL this honour goes to your similarly low IQ moronic friend Bliss. they loser was a joke from the very beginning LOL. First he talks about apartheid in India, I prove him wrong. Then that lying shit selectively chooses pics of Agarkar and our Ex President Mukherjee to show them as blakies. I post pics and videos and rightfully show the world what a lying scum he was. Then he claims we Indians are all ASI. I prove him wrong. The guy is a joke. Then he debates me about the Hoffmeyr Skull, I blast him back to his shithole. LOL. What a joker?

  287. Malla says:
    @Okechukwu

    Bliss is schooling your ignorant ass on this matter, but I’ll just add this disclaimer from the very scientists who studied the Abusir el-Meleq mummies.

    Bliss is a lying joker who cannot school any sensible man. He can school someone of your low standards, sure.

    add this disclaimer from the very scientists who studied the Abusir el-Meleq mummies.
    “However, we note that all our genetic data were obtained from a single site in Middle Egypt and may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt.”

    Stop cherry picking your quotes.
    Let us see the whole thing shall we.

    http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/9/40/270666/Heritage/Ancient-Egypt/Not-out-of-Africa.aspx

    “In their paper, the researchers acknowledged that “all our genetic data were obtained from a single site in Middle Egypt and may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt.” In the south of Egypt, the authors wrote, Sub-Saharan African influences may have been stronger.

    So we see that the researchers have doubts only about the South of Egypt. Not the North.

    More, the Mr. Hawass part

    “How can the ancient Egyptians be genetically from Europe,” Hawass asked, adding that when the ancient Egyptians were busy building their civilisation Europe did not exist in civilisational terms.

    The longer snippet of the webpage goes like this
    “The mummies that were subjected to the DNA tests dated to the Graeco-Roman period when the mummification process was very poor, he said. They also belonged to people who came from Italy or to Greeks who lived in ancient Egypt and not to native ancient Egyptians.

    “How can the ancient Egyptians be genetically from Europe,” Hawass asked, adding that when the ancient Egyptians were busy building their civilisation Europe did not exist in civilisational terms.”
    ..snip…
    ““The ancient Egyptians have Egyptian genes, which are not similar to African or Arab genes,” Hawass said.”

    Hey the Mr. Hawass you love to quote so much says the ancient Egyptians have genes dissimilar to African genes!!. Did you miss that part on purpose or was it an honest mistake? LMFAO.

    Further from Mr. Hawass

    “He said that recent studies were not the only ones to be published about the genes and the origins of the ancient Egyptians. Thirty years ago, an African clergyman claimed that the ancient Egyptians were Africans because both the pharaohs Ramses II and Tutankhamun had commissioned wooden statues painted black, he said.

    The theory was discussed and disproved because all the walls of ancient Egyptian temples depict pharaohs fighting off enemies from Africa and Asia. A European institute had also conducted DNA analysis on samples from Tutankhamun and compared them with others from Europeans, and this had revealed only a 60 per cent similarity.

    A piece from Tutankhamun’s mummy had been sent to Europe for study after the discovery of the tomb in 1922 to investigate the reason for Tutankhamun’s early death. The result revealed that the king had died from burns, which was “totally untrue”, Hawass said.”

    LOL Did you miss this part on purpose. LOL

    And the second part, the researchers found out that

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/810888/ancient-egyptian-dna-genetics-turkish-european-african

    “The study found that ancient Egyptians were most closely related to ancient populations in the Levant (modern day Syria, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon), and were also closely related to Neolithic populations from the Anatolian Peninsula and Europe.”

    The researchers did not claim that they came from Europe alone but from the Levant and Europe. So Mr. Hawass should have mentioned Levant as well in all honesty.

    From the link you have given

    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2017/05/31/egyptian-mummy-dna-population/#.W46xHOhKhPY

    Still, by using multiple methods to test for contamination, the researchers say that they are confident in their findings. The samples came from bones, teeth and soft tissues, and the wealth of mummies allowed them to sift questionable data from their analysis. The fact that the three complete genomes come from different periods of Egypt is a boon to them as well, as it allowed them to see if ancestries changed over time. The data should also allow them to begin estimating population sizes in the region.”

    from the other link you have provided

    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/scientists-thought-ancient-egyptian-mummies-didn-t-have-any-dna-left-they-were-wrong

    “Krause turned to a collection of 151 mummy heads from the ancient settlement of Abusir el-Meleq, about 100 kilometers south of Cairo along the Nile. The settlement was devoted to Osiris, the god of the dead, making it a popular burial spot for many centuries.”

    …snip….
    Krause’s team compared the mummies’ mitochondrial and nuclear DNA to ancient and modern populations in the Near East and Africa. They discovered that ancient Egyptians closely resembled ancient and modern Near Eastern populations, especially those in the Levant. What’s more, the genetics of the mummies remained remarkably consistent even as different powers conquered the empire. It’s possible that the mitochondrial genomes simply don’t record the genetic contributions of foreign fathers, says Yehia Gad, a molecular geneticist at the National Research Centre in Cairo and a founder of the Egyptian Museum’s ancient DNA lab who worked with Zink on past mummy studies. But the three mummies with nuclear genome data also show striking genetic continuity, Krause points out.

    Later, however, something did alter the genomes of Egyptians. Although the mummies contain almost no DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, some 15% to 20% of modern Egyptians’ mitochondrial DNA reflects sub-Saharan ancestry.

    From

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/810888/ancient-egyptian-dna-genetics-turkish-european-african

    The team of scientists has recovered and analysed ancient DNA from Egyptian mummies dating from approximately 1400 BC to 400 AD – and they discovered they were genetically similar to people from the Mediterranean.

  288. bj says:
    @Malla

    Thanks for the link, Malla. It is hard to be an honest man in a world of lies and treason!

    • Replies: @Malla
  289. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    USA should just give back to Mexico all the land they stole

    Awww, poor Mexico. Because of conflict with the US they were forced to “give up” lands they won by war from Spain, who acquired the land by conquest of Native peoples.

    Sounds to me like Mexico really wasn’t ready to control the land they acquired by force.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  290. Malla says:
    @bj

    Welcome bud. Connect the dots and spread the truth around.

  291. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    Well, your video doesn’t prove Craig Murray is wrong. Mr Murray isn’t neutral. No one is. He isn’t a communist but he was against apartheid and an admirer of Nelson Mandela.

    But It seems to me reasonable to accept (because it’s human, so human) that those doing the sharing would keep the best parts of the cake for themselves. I’m sure if the blacks were in power, they would have done the same.

    “Why was Mandela opposing an independent black homeland which the blacks in that homeland wanted it?

    Because Nelson Mandela wanted power and power means centralization.

    “Mandela and the ANC were just commie agents and the communists were the agents of the globalist elites. And they did not want the various groups in South Africa black or White getting their own homelands. They wanted a united South Africa for some agenda.”

    That is true but irrelevant. Those who want power want centralization. Communists want centralization but so do the fascists, capitalists, democrats, liberals, etc..

    I believe we need power but less power the better. So, it would be better for men if blacks, whites, yellows get their own homogeneous homelands.

    Life will certainly be better and freer if Nigeria, SA, India, Brazil, USA, China, Russia, were broken in small units. The world will be better if we have countries with size of Switzerland, Iceland, Scotland, Catalonia, Tibet, Texas, California, etc..etc..;

  292. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    “Sounds to me like Mexico really wasn’t ready to control the land they acquired by force.”

    That is true. But the same applies to USA, no ?

    Maybe most Americans don’t know, but they do not control their land. It seems that a little country in ME controls the land Americans acquired by force.

    The situation is a little bit worse for Americans because they are asked to give their lives so that that small control can acquire more lands and resources by force.

  293. . The fact is that between 1942 and 1945, the FDR administration dispensed with habeas corpus in order to relocate en masse, and confine in camps, some 112,000 Japanese aliens and American-born citizens of Japanese ancestry.

    They had to do this on the West Coast because other Americans would have torn them to pieces in the street.

    Now you’re asking, what kind of American would do that?

    Well, duh… One who would vote for the likes of FDR three times.

  294. @Malla

    The Left have a trendy phrase for white persons like Amy Carmichael: “white savior”. Such coinages serve to forestall inconvenient thinking or recognition of moral nobility and nuance. The neo-Marxists recognize the power of pseudo-intellectual jargon, particularly to the young, as it stereotypes, provides a short circuit to propaganda, and adds radical chic. Many youth want to sound hip and to not be left out (FOMO), so they delegate their thinking to those who spoon-feed them the vocabulary of self-hate and contempt for rational debate (“white fragility”) and for enemies of The Narrative.

  295. my2cents says:
    @Apex Predator

    When someone declares war on you because their psyche cannot handle Germany being the second largest economy in the world after the U.S and their aim is to break it up……then engage in the targeted bombing of German cities killing Women and children, the eventual result after 4 months of hitting German cities was that Berlin decided to hit London and the population there could not understand any of it. No one told them that their Government had been hitting German Cities for 4 months. You might want to check your history books. Bombings are not funny or comical, not in Germany and not in London. I was fire bombed 3 times by the U.S. with a faulty atlas on May 19, 21 and 23, 1945 in the Netherlands….I went to school in a bombed out building.

  296. kikz says:

    no ‘urban amenities’ in Wakanda????????? *mock shock*

    …from pt1: “Easily the most egregious aspect of flushing blacks out of white areas was the manner in which entire communities were uprooted and dumped in bleak, remote, officially designated settlement sites— “vast rural slums with urban population densities, but no urban amenities beyond the buses that represented their slender lifelines to the cities.”

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.