The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Gene Expression BlogTeasers
The Species Barriers Between Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

gr2 A new paper in The American Journal of Humans Genetics, The Divergence of Neandertal and Modern Human Y Chromosomes, reports on possible reasons why we don’t see Y chromosomes in modern humans from this archaic lineage, despite exhibiting detectable levels of autosomal admixture. As you might recall the clear lack of deep branching Y and mtDNA lineages was long one of the major genetic rationales for why gene flow between Neanderthals and modern humans was presumably not very significant. This, despite suggestive evidence from morphological analysis as well as inferences from autosomal data. The problem is that it is harder to do the sort of clean phylogenetic reconstruction via a coalescent model utilizing autosomal data (which recombines, as opposed to the Y and mtDNA, which do not for the regions of interest), so ancient genome sequences were really what was needed to convince most people with these sorts of markers.

This makes us ask: why are Neanderthal Y and mtDNA lineages not found in modern humans which exhibit indications of gene flow from other hominin lineages? After all, the lack of these really led many people off on the wrong track for years. I recall in 2008 going to a talk by Svante Paabo who reported that the Neanderthal mtDNA he had sequenced was definitely very different from anything in the current databases for our species, which confirmed his assumption that there was no admixture into modern populations (Paabo changed his tune very soon after due to the whole genome sequencing obviously). One simple explanation is that because effective population sizes of Y and mtDNA are smaller than autosomal regions of the genome they’ll be more strongly subject to drift, and exhibit higher extinction rates. In other words, it wouldn’t be that surprising of all Neanderthal Y and mtDNA went extinct after admixture because they were a small minority, and most lineages went extinct in any case. Researchers who work in non-human phylogeography who relied on mtDNA in particular can tell of many stories of being led astray by looking at one informative locus.

But chance may not be what is at work here. Buried in the discussion of the paper:

…polypeptides from several Y-chromosome genes act as male-specific minor histocompatibility (H-Y) antigens that can elicit a maternal immune response during gestation. Such effects could be important drivers of secondary recurrent miscarriages30 and might play a role in the fraternal birth order effect of male sexual orientation.31 Interestingly, all three genes with potentially functional missense differences between the Neandertal and modern humans sequences are H-Y genes, including KDM5D, the first H-Y gene characterized…It is tempting to speculate that some of these mutations might have led to genetic incompatibilities between modern humans and Neandertals and to the consequent loss of Neandertal Y chromosomes in modern human populations. Indeed, reduced fertility or viability of hybrid offspring with Neandertal Y chromosomes is fully consistent with Haldane’s rule, which states that “when in the [first generation] offspring of two different animal races one sex is absent, rare, or sterile, that sex is the [heterogametic] sex.”

The origin of species is obviously one of the founding questions which arose with the emergence of evolutionary biology. Haldane’s rule dates to the 1920s. In mammals the heterogametic sex are males, so these the hybrids which will be selected against (or, they may be sterile). There’s been a lot of research of late on why Neanderthals went extinct, and whether there were speciation barriers in keeping with the biological species concept between our two lineages. This result suggests that there is going to be interesting stuffed coming out of the population genomics of ancient hominins in the near future….

 
• Category: Science • Tags: Genetics, Neanderthals 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
    []
  1. Just wondering: is the Denisovan Y present in Melanesian populations? Thanks in advance for the reply. I’m only a 1st year Genetics undergrad, so barely know anything about population genetics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tobus
    There are 3 Denisovans sampled to date and AFAIK none have yielded any Y-DNA (although 2 are male).... so "no" is the answer to your question. The Denisovan mtDNA samples we have don't match any modern human haplogroups either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/gnxp/the-species-barriers-between-neanderthals-and-anatomically-modern-humans/#comment-1664633
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. I think some fertile Neanderthal hybrid male were probably around. A woman, even if inarticulate and odd looking, can get sex easier than any normal man. Men eliminate competition by picking on odd looking and socially isolated men.The male hybrids may have been at too much of a disadvantage.

    Read More
  3. @Alex
    Just wondering: is the Denisovan Y present in Melanesian populations? Thanks in advance for the reply. I'm only a 1st year Genetics undergrad, so barely know anything about population genetics.

    There are 3 Denisovans sampled to date and AFAIK none have yielded any Y-DNA (although 2 are male)…. so “no” is the answer to your question. The Denisovan mtDNA samples we have don’t match any modern human haplogroups either.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The answer to his question doesn't need any sequenced Denisovans Y chromosomes...
    We already know Oceanian people have a huge 5-7% admixture from Denisovans autosomally. So the only thing we need to do is sequence enough Oceanian until we find a deeply diverged Y chromosome that doesn't descend from chromosomal Adam.
    So far, we have no case of that happening AFAIK. But there was this earlier this year:
    http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(16)00078-6
  4. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Tobus
    There are 3 Denisovans sampled to date and AFAIK none have yielded any Y-DNA (although 2 are male).... so "no" is the answer to your question. The Denisovan mtDNA samples we have don't match any modern human haplogroups either.

    The answer to his question doesn’t need any sequenced Denisovans Y chromosomes…
    We already know Oceanian people have a huge 5-7% admixture from Denisovans autosomally. So the only thing we need to do is sequence enough Oceanian until we find a deeply diverged Y chromosome that doesn’t descend from chromosomal Adam.
    So far, we have no case of that happening AFAIK. But there was this earlier this year:

    http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(16)00078-6

    Read More

Comments are closed.