The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersGene Expression Blog
Congratulations to OpenSNP
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

For winning the API Binary Battle! The Nature News weblog has a moderately overwrought piece on the possibilities for crowd-sourcing in genetics. Interestingly they report that openSNP only has 50 genotypes. That’s lame. Though I haven’t poked around the site much since I initially loaded my data. I’ll have to spend some time this weekend looking at it….

(Republished from Discover/GNXP by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Science • Tags: openSNP, Personal Genomics 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. You are right, currently we don’t have enough genotypes to make meaningful studies with this sample size (although other studies with n=23 get published in PNAS ;)) at openSNP. To help a bit with this we are currently applying for funding, in order to get some more people who are willing to share genotyped. You can read more about this in the openSNP-blog:

  2. It’s a great thing, but at the same time I’m worried because it seems to reinforce the misconception that genes are traits. We need to change the public’s mentality on this, and making tests readily available to the public reinforces the misconception, IMO. It could also lead to various false positives (or false negatives, for that matter) because we don’t know all that we could possibly know about gene-to-gene interactions and epistasis.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Razib Khan Comments via RSS