The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGilad Atzmon Archive
Why Not Make Parliament Into a Holocaust Memorial?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Five British Prime Ministers, some of them renowned war criminals, united yesterday in a call to build a Holocaust Memorial in proximity to Parliament. “A sacred, national mission,” is how Theresa May described the idea and for once, I totally agree with this tragic, sad woman. I would take it further: don’t just build a holocaust shrine in Westminster, make our parliament into a Holocaust monument. We don’t really need a House of Commons; as things stand, we better get direct orders from our true rulers in Tel Aviv.

But there is a deeper ethical rationale that justifies the erection of a holocaust memorial instead of our dysfunctional parliament. Every political commentator in Britain knows by now that the more that Jewish pressure groups terrorise the kingdom, its human rights campaigners, its artists, writers and poets, the more Brits become aware of the crimes of Zionism, Israel and their ruthless Lobby. The more British politicians join Parliamentary friends of Israel clubs, the less Brits trust their political system. The more Holocaust indoctrination is shoved down our throats, the more suspicious Brits become of the manner in which history is told.

Mrs May said: “By putting our National Holocaust Memorial and Education Centre next to our Parliament, we make a solemn and eternal promise that Britain will never forget what happened in the Holocaust.” Is that true Mrs. May? Do you really mean what you say? Will our Holocaust memorial bring to light the embarrassing fact that Britain made it very difficult for Jewish refugees to seek a safe haven in the Kingdom or in other parts of the empire? In 1937, as the rate of Jewish refugees looking to immigrate to Britain increased, the British government created stricter standards for those whom they would admit. One was that refugees had to have ₤50 deposited in an overseas bank, but in Germany it was against the law to possess foreign currency. If this was not enough to stop Jewish immigration from Germany, the British government limited the number of immigrants in 1938 and 1939. Practically speaking, the British Government turned its back on German and Austrian Jews.

The PM vowed that “in the face of despicable Holocaust denial, this memorial will stand to preserve the truth forever.” I am here to tell you with confidence that the British Holocaust memorial will act intensively to conceal British complicity in the destruction of European Jewry.

Mrs May was joined by all the living former prime ministers: David Cameron, Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and Sir John Major. With the exception of Sir John Major, all our living PMs are involved in a lot of death and carnage. While Blair and Brown led this kingdom to a disastrous criminal war in Iraq that led to millions of casualties, it was Cameron who managed to pull this country into a chain of disasters in Libya, Syria and beyond.

ORDER IT NOW

Tony Blair whom third of the British people see as a war criminal said in his message that “Antisemitism and hate did not end in 1945. Unfortunately today some of this poison is back from the political fringe to parts of the political mainstream.” Blair was probably referring to his own party that struggles to disown the criminal past he himself inflicted on it. But the truth of the matter is that Antisemitism didn’t die in 1945, certainly not in Britain. The post-war Labour Government went out of its way to make the lives of Jewish holocaust survivors impossible. In Zionist history, British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin (Labour) is remembered as one of the bitterest enemies of the Jewish people. This senior Labour politician had opposed removing the limiting of Jewish immigration to Palestine. Is this Zionist chronicle of Labour anti-Jewish politics going to be explored in the Holocaust monument?

It doesn’t take a genius to gather why Blair and Brown are so enthusiastic about a museum that Chronicles Nazi crimes rather than a proper and timely institute that would explore their own crimes in Iraq. It is pretty clear why David Cameron prefers to divert attention from his own blunders in Syria and Libya. But it goes further. Britain and the Empire have a long list of crimes against humanity to account for: slavery, concentration camps in the Boer war, the partitioning of India, the destruction of Palestine, famines in Ireland and Bengal. Millions of innocent people lost their lives due to the crimes of the empire, yet our ethically compromised Prime Ministers are committed to the commemoration of crimes that were committed by another people. Is this the ethical message we are supposed to pass to the next generations? Is zero self-reflection a new British value?

I have learned that Jeremy Corbyn, the person who according to the polls is destined to become our next PM, is not at all different from his predecessors. Corbyn, who at a certain point claimed to care for the many, is now subscribing to the primacy of Jewish suffering. Corbyn was quick to announce that he also would “strongly support permanent commemoration, including a national memorial, alongside extra investment in educational programmes.” I guess that supporting a Holocaust memorial is an entry ticket to 10 Downing Street.

(Republished from Gilad Atzmon by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 68 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Are any of them concerned with what neoliberalism has done to their economy? Do they have a widespread middle class? I doubt it. Prime Minister’s Question Hour occasionally contains some honest assessments about the dearth of quality jobs in Britain, with reps railing against a system in which people are “living on tax credits.”

    Most of the animus is directed at the hated, single, childless Brits who’ve had that tax cash handout extended to them, unlike in the USA, where the progrsssive tax code is only used to pay citizens and noncitizens for womb-productive sex.

    No doubt, the “tax credit” for non womb producers in such heavy dispute is a much, much, much, much, much smaller sum than the multilayered monthly welfare that covers most household bills for citizens and noncitizens in Britain—no less than in the USA—if they work part time, staying under the earned-income limits for the programs.

    In the USA, the neoliberal refundable child tax credit—rewarding single moms, legal and illegal immigrants for sex and reproduction has gotten bigger and bigger over the years, maxing out now at $6,431 on top of their monthly cash assistance and welfare that covers every bill from food to rent.

    Everyone else is facing rent costs that have stranded whole generations in their parents’ basement and other insumountable costs, with 40 years of falling wages and a bunch of temp / part time job opportunities that are just fine with the citizens and noncitizens flocking to the USA to get paid for womb-productive sex by the US government. They don’t need higher pay or full-time, non-temp jobs due to their pay from government for sex and reproduction.

    Thanks to neoliberals, all single-breadwinner households with kids have to do is keep their traceable income under the earned-income limits for welfare via part-time work or, in cases where temp-job wages are a little higher, skip the pay-per-birth welfare during months when they exceed the earned-income limits.

    That way, top 20%er dual-high-earner parents who monopolize the few decent-paying jobs, keeping two per household to finance a posh lifestyle while NannyCam-surveilled low-wage babysitters or elderly grandparents raise their kids, have lots of willing servants to work cheaply for them while they trundle around the globe, taking lengthy vacation after vacation and calling it “work.” The top 20% loves to keep the conversation on race & ethnicity, rather than on these economic issues.

    • Agree: MarkU, Digital Samizdat
  2. I knew it was going to happen sooner or later. You can take the boy out of Israel, but you can’t take Israel out of the boy.
    Atzmon’s narrative could have been written by any Israeli politician. There is one simple fact: the NSDAP wanted Jews, who identified as Jews not Germans, out of Germany and so did the Zionists in Germany.
    I cannot say enough times: read Doug Christie’s cross examination of prosecution witnesses during the Zundel trials. The big names who were central to creating the narrative were completely discredited. I won’t even go into the defense witnesses, including some Jews, who were “survivors” but called the narrative bullshit.
    These 5 treasonous politicians are not beyond turning Westminster Abbey, which is virtually next to Parliament, into their dear Holocaust Memorial. The philo-Semitic political class in the UK has been occupied territory for more than 300 years, the rest of the population has been more resistant and is more astute than the political class thinks.

    • Replies: @Paw
    , @eah
  3. Tusk says:

    I, for one, welcome the removal of all shrines and temples to make space for memorial monuments of the Holocaust™ as this would finally create a great and wonderful kosher society for the rest of us filthy goyim to enjoy!

  4. MarkU says:

    We don’t really need a House of Commons; as things stand, we better get direct orders from our true rulers in Tel Aviv.

    I find it hard to believe that Gilad Atzmon truly believes that Israel is the true source of all that political influence. None of this would be happening without the connivance of the deep state, both here in the UK, the US, and in most of Europe for that matter.

    Otherwise a very good article.

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @Franz
  5. Anon[174] • Disclaimer says:

    Couching anything that has to do with the people responsible for inverting Western morality as “sacred” is the final declaration of success in the inversion of morality. I can’t think of a stronger incongruence.

    Its clear that the only way the West is going to be able to have politicians that serve it instead of the Specials is by at-once replacing the hierarchy in-full and across all domains.

  6. Sean says:
    @MarkU

    Corbyn is part Jewish, so is Bliar. The higher ranks of the civil service is no different to the political leadership. So how are you going to out argue people who are cleverer than you? Well you can’t!

    • Replies: @MarkU
  7. DaveLee says:

    For all that he claims to be an ex Jew, he still loves his Jewish politics – dragging up all the bad things about British history (with a couple of ommissions and lies thrown in – yes there was slaving but we were the first to abolish the trade and the partition of India was demanded by Jenner).

    Why do these people continue to live in such an awful country?

    • Replies: @John12755
  8. Paw says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Seems to be far biggest and the most important and only one problem of this world.
    Nothing matters now , only one event back 70 years ..
    Or another instrument how to rule over the world.
    At the same time these and the same FEVERISH ,lunatic “activists’ push the world into wars everywhere. Coincidence.

    • Replies: @Floki
  9. Ray P says:

    John Major led his country in the first Persian Gulf war – Desert Storm in January of nineteen ninety-one which featured the slaughter of retreating Iraqi soldiers in the road to Basra turkey-shoot.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  10. MarkU says:
    @Sean

    Jeremy Corbyn, due no doubt to his naturally concilliatory nature made the fatal error of adopting an apologetic stance over the phoney antisemitism accusations, he has been on the back foot ever since.

    What the labour party really needs is a leader with a spine and however well meaning Corbyn is he hasn’t got one. Jeremy Corbyn is also a mediocre disputant. George Galloway on the other hand would never have made such an elementary error, he is a talented orator and disputant who would have snuffed out their pathetic arguments and accusations with minimal effort.

    As to their “cleverness”, there was a time when UK politicians were known for their slippery qualities and subtlety, but those days are long gone. What we have now is barefaced lies, relying purely on repetition and monolithic corporate media ownership. They are not winning arguments because they are clever, I have never seen such transparently obvious bullshit before. Neither have I seen such lame “opposition”, when I watch them in action I almost always conclude that I could put up better arguments myself, off the top of my head. The only people in UK politics that impress me one whit are (the already mentioned) Galloway and Nigel Farage, the rest are mainly empty suits.

    If you think them so damned clever, what are you doing here?

    • Replies: @Tsigantes
  11. eah says:
    @Curmudgeon

    …read Doug Christie’s cross examination of prosecution witnesses during the Zundel trials.

    You are right, and it is too bad this trial, albeit that it happened nearly 35 years ago, is not more widely known — Raul Hilberg refused to take part in the second Zündel trial because he was humiliated on the stand in the first, where one “eyewitness” even made the absurd claim, in a modern court of law, that he could tell the nationality of Jews being cremated by the color of the smoke coming from the chimney — but Christie had very capable help preparing the case, from eg Arthur Butz and Robert Faurisson.

    A good documentary about the trial is available — search for ‘The Great Holocaust Trial’ — a couple of links:

    part 1

    part 2

    • Replies: @anon
  12. Saggy says: • Website

    Millions of innocent people lost their lives due to the crimes of the empire, yet our ethically compromised Prime Ministers are committed to the commemoration of crimes that were committed by another people.

    Atzmon promotes the holohoax with almost every article he writes. The ‘Holocaust’ did not happen, it is a 100% invention. There was no Nazi plan to kill Jews. The gas chambers are pure phantasmagoria. The number of Jews that died in the camps for being Jews is zero. See http://www.holohoax101.org or https://www.bitchute.com/video/UrvhI0gF00d5/

    • Agree: Fool's Paradise
    • Replies: @MarkU
  13. Mulegino1 says:

    The very term “Holocaust” (capital “H”) ought to be avoided entirely as it refers to a non-event.

    There were indeed holocausts which occurred during the Second World War, but virtually all of them were perpetrated by the Anglo-American air forces upon civilians dwelling in European and Japanese cities.

    In all likelihood, not a single Jew was killed by the Germans simply for being a Jew as a matter of carrying out National Socialist policy.

    • Agree: Wally
  14. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Welcome to the Jewish Gulag or Julag.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @anon
  15. anon[392] • Disclaimer says:

    Five British Prime Ministers, some of them renowned war criminals, united yesterday in a call to build a Holocaust Memorial in proximity to Parliament. “A sacred, national mission,” is how Theresa May described the idea….

    wow, crazy

    if Brits can’t see that their politicians are total whores for the jew by now…

  16. anon[392] • Disclaimer says:

    Will our Holocaust memorial bring to light the embarrassing fact that Britain made it very difficult for Jewish refugees to seek a safe haven in the Kingdom or in other parts of the empire?

    is it embarrassing that there was a ship full of jews prior to WW2 and this ship went from country to country to country and nobody wanted them? what does this say about jews?

    sounds like they’ve been hated by many different people for a loooooong time – for no reason at all of course

    • Agree: Tusk
    • Replies: @Anon
  17. anon[137] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    doctor Brown is a yid pretending to some sort of Christianity.

  18. anarchyst says:

    Holohoax (oops, I mean “holocaust”) museums are jewish “freak shows”, nothing more and should be recognized as such…

    That being said…

    There is NOT ONE DOCUMENT outlining any extermination plan for jews or others. In fact, prominent Zionists collaborated with the German government and formulated plans at the highest level of the German government for the transfer of jews to what was then known as Palestine. Absolutely nothing was noted about extermination.

    [MORE]

    Official International Red Cross figures for all camp deaths total around 731,000-NOT 6,000,000. In fact, population totals pre-WW2 and post-WW2 show an INCREASE in the jewish population in post-WW2 Europe immediately after the cessation of the war.

    If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD IT KEEP RECORDS?? WHY would it build camps hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, medical, recreational and other ancillary facilities? Would it not have been easier to just eliminate them without going through all of this trouble? Why would they expend massive effort on logistical movement utilizing their limited energy resources if the goal was extermination? Things do not add up.

    Something BIG stinks in this whole jewish holocaust deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made deals with the German government in order to make life uncomfortable for jewish Germans. In fact, it was jewish Zionist leaders who first proposed that all jews wear the yellow Star of David armband so that they could be easily identified. German jews considered themselves Germans first and had no desire to emigrate.

    The camps were internally run by the residents themselves who were called “sonderkommandos”. They were primarily jewish Zionist criminals who were responsible for day-to-day operations within the camps, such as doling out job assignments, and even food rations. They ate well, while those who were not “connected” merely subsisted It is interesting to note, that in the jewish Warsaw “ghetto”, the jewish “leaders” lived quite well, while much of the ordinary population subsisted on meager rations. The jewish Zionist intelligentia made sure that they lived quite well, even in the Warsaw ghetto.

    Punishment for misbehavior by German camp personnel against the residents of the camps was swift and sure as abuse of residents was not permitted. Unlike the fabrications in “Schindler’s List” showing German camp commander Amon Goethe utilizing jews as “target practice” (never happened), abuse of inmates was swiftly dealt with, as healthy workers were needed for the war effort.
    The establishment of a homeland along with the 6,000,000 figure was a Zionist dream since the 1800s. Many periodicals of the day starting with the early 1800s touted the “six-million” figure.

    What better way to encourage emigration to a foreign land than to make things difficult for the cream of German society (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish holocaust is out . . .

    As cremation of ONE human body takes hours, the amount of time claimed by holocaust promoters is a physical, scientific and statistical impossibility. Their claims also do not account for the “downtime” that crematoria require for maintenance, etc. In addition, there are no mass burial sites that are commensurate with the claims of “six-million” or even “one-million”. There is also a jewish prohibition on excavation of claimed possible burial sites. WHY? Because THEY DO NOT EXIST. There is even a prohibition on the use of ground penetrating radar to search for burial sites. WHY?? If millions were gassed and cremated, the activities would have lasted well into the 1950s.

    The so-called jewish holocaust has been turned into a de-facto religion (“holocaustianity”)in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish holocaust truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the tribe that FEAR the real truth of the jewish holocaust being exposed is evident. A questionable and totally dishonest judicial “trick” used in holocaust trials is that of “judicial notice” in which TRUTH CANNOT BE USED AS A DEFENSE OR ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE IN THE KANGAROO COURTS THAT PROSECUTE THOSE WHO DARE TO INVESTIGATE THIS HISTORICAL EVENT. “Judicial notice”, once invoked against a defendant, disallows the introduction of evidence that does not conform to “commonly accepted beliefs” about the “holocaust”, EVEN IF THE EVIDENCE PROVES THAT THE “HOLOCAUST” CLAIMS ARE LIES AND FABRICATIONS. A question for you holocaust promoters-why are there laws that criminalize the search for truth?? What are you afraid of??

    When the truth about this minor historical event comes out, it will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a cash cow that keeps on giving. . . there’s NO business like SHOAH business. To this day, Zionist complicity in this event is carefully covered up.

    It is said that it takes approximately 100 years for historical truth to be finally accepted, free from the taint and biases of the “victors” (who are quite often successful in their attempts to downplay and dismiss historical facts. World War 2 will be seen as an attack on Germany, which was coming into its own on the world stage as a technological superpower, posing a threat to then British and American hegemony, as well as being a threat to the Rothschild banking cartel.

    A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question official jewish holocaust orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the official jewish holocaust story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to all things holocaust. Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment.

    The latest “victims” of “holocaustianity” are Ursula Haverbeck, Sylvia Stolz and Monika Schaefer, women who have been prosecuted and sentenced to maximum-security prisons in Germany for “incorrect thoughts”.

    If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the chosen) to engineer the jewish holocaust, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish holocaust was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state. In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many holocausts of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish holocaust is the only one that counts . . . It is interesting to note that the term “holocaust ” to mean “mass extermination” was never used during or immediately after WW2, only coming to vogue in the 1960s, when it was noted that “guilt” could be assigned and reparations could be procured.

    Look at the deification and commercialization of the so-called jewish holocaust while the much larger communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten. To assure a continuing supply of jewish holocaust survivors, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean camp numbers) on their children and grandchildren. In addition, jewish psychologists have come up with a new concept, and disease-holocaust transference syndrome”. You see, only jewish children and grandchildren of jewish holocaust survivors are infected with this disease and should also be considered holocaust survivors, eligible for holocaust reparations. According to these jewish psychiatrists, even unrelated individuals can be “infected” with this “malady”.

    Since the Zionist jews declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), the Germans had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least).. This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a homeland-Israel. It is interesting to note that the German boycott of jewish businesses lasted for one day, while the jewish boycott (actually the jews’ declaration of war on Germany) started in 1933 and lasted until the summation of WW2.

    Zionists have been predicting a jewish “homeland” for the last two-hundred years while predicting a holocaust of 6 million for the same amount of time. The ACTUAL number of non-combatant deaths in the European theater of operations is approximately 731,000, NOT 6 million (official International Red Cross figures). The International Red Cross had full access to all of the camps for the duration of the war, yet reported NOT ONE INSTANCE of extermination or mass murder.

    Regarding that holocaust showplace, Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called gas chambers. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called gassing took place. There is a gas chamber chimney that is not connected to anything. From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the operators of these supposed gas chambers. As Germans were excellent engineers, it is difficult to observe the glaring engineering errors that presently exist in these camps.

    American execution expert, Fred Leuchter travelled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported gas chambers, had them tested and published his results. The absence of Prussian blue (ferricyanide) in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the gas chambers did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing. In fact, the chimney for the supposed gas chamber does not connect to anything.

    Mr. Leuchter was rewarded for his search for TRUTH by his professional and personal character assassination by those of the tribe. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts law for practicing engineering without a license-a law which had never been used vindictively before or since. . .After his report was published, he was harassed by Israeli “deep state” types (mossad) who he successfully “outed”.

    It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets attempted to create the death camps for propaganda purposes. Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering, many people perished. The prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

    It is interesting to note that, before the camps were liberated by the allies, the camp occupants chose to flee with the German troops, rather than be “liberated” by the Russian allies.

    It is said that “the light of day is the best disinfectant in the search for truth” Unfortunately this quote does not apply to “all things holocaust”. It appears that there are those “holocaust” promoters who are afraid of the TRUTH. Hence the prosecution and incarceration of those who dare question aspects of this historical event.

    I urge all holocaust believers to check these things out for yourselves IF YOU DARE. You will not like what you find.

  19. MarkU says:
    @Saggy

    The number of Jews that died in the camps for being Jews is zero.

    So we have to go from one extreme to the other? I think this is getting more than a little silly. I can’t really know what your agenda is but I suspect strongly that you and Mulegrino1 are false flagging, you are even using practically identical wording. Could it be that you are part of a plot to get this site closed down? or perhaps you need to be more discriminating about your sources.

    Don’t get me wrong here, the full blown holocaust account is obviously full of unlikely, even preposterous claims but there is no real doubt that Jews were genocidally persecuted by the Nazis, along with communists, socialists, trade unionists, Gypsies, homosexuals, Jehovah’s witnesses and many others. Don’t think I didn’t note your slippery wording, but in my books people who are incarcerated in unsanitory conditions, inadequately fed and without medical care who end up dying of typhus or malnutrition are just as dead as people who are shot or gassed, a case could be made that it is even more cruel to kill people that way.

  20. anon[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @eah

    thanks for these links

    downloading the audio now

  21. anon[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    hmm, where’d you find her?

    Sydney Watson – 182k subscribers

    video published May 8th, already 3200 comments

    she’s already censored on Facebook apparently

    unfortunately she believes that Mastercard wouldn’t love to ban right-wingers on their own, imo this pressure group just gives them cover for doing what they want to do anyway

  22. Anon[258] • Disclaimer says:
    @MarkU

    Don’t get me wrong here, the full blown holocaust account is obviously full of unlikely

    “Hey guys, your views are correct”!

    even preposterous claims but there is no real doubt that Jews were genocidally persecuted by the Nazis, along with communists, socialists, trade unionists, Gypsies, homosexuals, Jehovah’s witnesses and many others.

    “But the Jewish narrative is more correct”!

    “Note my counter-assertion that completely lacks the foundation (all context) of further discussion that is painstakingly provided throughout the rest of this website”!

    Slide posts are getting ham fisted, these days.

    Don’t think I didn’t note your slippery wording,

    Who cares what you note? You haven’t provided a single morally compelling argument, let alone one that has the ring of historical accuracy.

    but in my books people who are incarcerated in unsanitory conditions, inadequately fed and without medical care who end up dying of typhus or malnutrition are just as dead as people who are shot or gassed, a case could be made that it is even more cruel to kill people that way.

    Oh, okay. So, Jews are losing the narrative war and so the goalposts are moved to indict due to casualties caused by common wartime conditions. Your “books” are corrupt and self serving.

    How about this:

    people who casually follow a genocidal, imperialist religion that was then recently responsible for genocidal and regicidal communism (see any number of Jewish, even Orthodox Rabbinical sources) that was threatening Germany and the rest of the world are “just as responsible” for the wars and deaths that result from its larger movements as the people who are leading those movements. Wars that were the cause of the deaths of the innately hostile foreign national (Jewish national) civilians whose narrative that you are attempting to rescue with your sliding morality and history.

    No sale, and the attempt was intellectually insulting and time wasting.

  23. Anon[258] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    is it embarrassing that there was a ship full of jews prior to WW2 and this ship went from country to country to country and nobody wanted them? what does this say about jews?

    It says that accepting them is equivalent to accepting your eventually certain national death and destruction (per the Jewish texts), and people then knew it.

    It was like willfully accepting a slow poison.

    People were much smarter before the intense post WWII pro-Jew propaganda efforts.

  24. Tsigantes says:
    @MarkU

    Bravo!

    As to their “cleverness”, there was a time when UK politicians were known for their slippery qualities and subtlety, but those days are long gone. What we have now is barefaced lies, relying purely on repetition and monolithic corporate media ownership. They are not winning arguments because they are clever, I have never seen such transparently obvious bullshit before.

    ‘Clever is as clever does’ – once said with a snort – is a compliment too far for the deeply corrupted, vulgar, mediocre nobodies who comprise the self-styled ‘elites’. In this group ‘cleverness’ simply means the lies they are paid to say repeated loudly and often. And because they have the reins on power, the non-compliant are punished by thugs.

  25. Will our Holocaust memorial bring to light the embarrassing fact that Britain made it very difficult for Jewish refugees to seek a safe haven in the Kingdom … ?

    I wonder if this wasn’t somehow a deliberate Zionist move.

    How? Well, consider the old Jackson-Vanik policy in the US. Its stated intent was to allow Soviet Jewry to emigrate if they wished. But, as I understand it, JV also diverted a majority of those Jews who wished to settle in the West to Israel instead. In fact, according to Wikipedia, about twice as many Jews ended up in Israel as compared to the US as a consequence of the law. If true, then it’s not hard to fathom the real motives of (((those who wrote the law))).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson–Vanik_amendment#Soviet_Union

    Now, could it also be the case that, back in the 30s, (((somebody powerful))) in the UK wanted the Jews to go to Palestine rather than to Britain itself? I understand that some of the Rothschilds, for example, were big supporters of Zionism. Isn’t there a street in Jerusalem named after one of them?

    Just an idea …

  26. Mulegino1 says:
    @MarkU

    I suspect strongly that you and Mulegrino1 are false flagging, you are even using practically identical wording.

    Well, your suspicions are ill founded. There is a new convergence of informed opinion on this matter, i.e., that while National Socialist Germany did have what could be styled as an anti-Jewish policy, it was both far more humane and equitable than was previously thought, and did not entail the murder of Jews simply for being Jews. No Jew was murdered as a result of this policy simply for being a Jew. No one claims that no Jews died in German camps, but their deaths, apart from those due to natural mortality, were directly attributable to the depredations of war and their concomitants such as disease, shortages of food and medical supplies, lack of sanitation, etc. The overwhelming majority of all of the deaths in the camps occurred in the last few weeks of the war, when much of Germany had been reduced to rubble and its transportation and supply grids completely destroyed.

    Could it be that you are part of a plot to get this site closed down?

    Who are the masters and arbiters of the moral universe who are going to “close down” this site? One assumes that the First Amendment to the Constitution is still in force.

  27. Saggy says: • Website
    @MarkU

    So we have to go from one extreme to the other?

    No, it’s a matter of going from the big lie to the truth. Remember the ‘big lie’, the biggest in the holohoax, so even though there is not a shred of evidence for something that did not happen beyond the endless lies of the Jews, you can’t quite accept that it isn’t at least partially true. Hitler’s analysis of the ‘big lie’ was spot on.

    It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.

    Hilter wanted the Jews out of Europe. They weren’t the first, and the Jews had been expelled from hundreds of countries before the Nazis appeared, see … http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/expulsions.html

    So, this singular event, the worst genocide in history, was in reality a scenario that had been enacted hundreds of times in Europe.

    To the particulars of prisoners killed in the camps, the fact is that the Nazis aggressively investigated crime in the camps by the SS, and it is well documented. The idea that Jews were killed in the camps for being Jews is not only false, it is absurd. See http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/08-07-46.asp

    HERR PELCKMANN: How many cases did you investigate? How many sentences were passed? How many death sentences?

    MORGEN: I investigated about 800 cases, that is, about 800 documents, and one document would affect several cases. About 200 were tried during my activity. Five concentration camp commanders were arrested by me personally. Two were shot after being tried.

    HERR PELCKMANN: You had them shot?

    MORGEN: Yes. Apart from the commanders, there were numerous other death sentences against Fuehrer and Unterfuehrer.

    HERR PELCKMANN: Did you have any opportunity of gaining personal insight into the conditions in concentration camps?

    MORGEN: Yes, because I had authority to visit concentration camps. Only a very few persons had this permission. Before beginning an investigation, I examined the concentration camp in question in all its details very closely, inspecting especially those arrangements which seemed particularly important to me. I visited them repeatedly and without notice. I was working mostly in Buchenwald itself for 8 months and have lived there. I was in Dachau for one or two months.

    HERR PELCKMANN: Now, briefly summarized, what was the outcome of the fight of the SS jurisdiction against crime in con-centration camps?

    REINECKE: Altogether, approximately 800 cases were investi-gated; 400 of these 800 cases were brought to trial, and 200 out of those 400 ended with sentences by the court. Among the cases investigated were proceedings against five commanders of concentra-tion camps; proceedings against two commanders were completed and ended with a sentence of death by shooting.,

    • Replies: @MarkU
  28. Saggy says: • Website
    @Mulegino1

    Who are the masters and arbiters of the moral universe who are going to “close down” this site?

    That’s easy to answer: the Jews. Just ask Andrew Anglin.

  29. macilrae says:

    But the truth of the matter is that Antisemitism didn’t die in 1945, certainly not in Britain.

    Probably a majority of Brits at that time had very little social contact with Jews – but during the war it was well-known that many Jews claimed to be conscientious objectors and that their representation in the armed forces was well below what it was in society. This was definitely not the case, however, among the wartime profiteers – a large proportion of whom were Jewish.

    The widespread resentment this caused was pretty understandable and a prodigy of corrective propaganda – much of it focusing on Jewish suffering in the camps – had to be implemented in a fairly successful attempt to reverse the prejudice.

    Latterly, of course, Israel’s record in its treatment of the Palestinians – and the Jewish community’s aggressive attempts to justify this and to crush any criticism – has indeed brought about a resurgence of antisemitism. Not just in the UK but pretty well everywhere – no mystery about that.

  30. “In 1937, as the rate of Jewish refugees looking to immigrate to Britain increased, the British government created stricter standards for those whom they would admit.”

    Let’s not forget that Zionist groups, run by Jews, worked very hard to prevent their fellow Jews prior to WWII per Alison Weir’s “Against Our Better Judgment” and no problem with Jews dying if it supported the Zionist project.

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  31. John12755 says:
    @DaveLee

    Bruce or Caitlyn? Need to be sure to get the right person on record.

  32. Saggy says: • Website

    But the truth of the matter is that Antisemitism didn’t die in 1945, certainly not in Britain.

    Antisemitism results from the Jews attitude toward non-Jews. It’s not a secret, the Jews are the Chosen and the rest of us are swine. And, they are actively planning right now to enslave the swine and to kill the recalcitrants (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah). Documentation? This 12 minute video contains clips from an interview with the head of one of Israel’s top military institutes, who spells it out in detail.

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  33. About Curmudgeon’s and Saggy’s suggestion that Atzmon’s Jewishness prevents him from confronting the truth of the Hoax of the 20the Century: Atzmon is too intelligent, too well informed, to believe this hoax that has deranged the world. Perhaps it is more dangerous for a Jew to “deny” the holocaust than others. Remember David Cole, who wrote 46 Unanswered Questions about Auschwitz gas chambers: threatened, and fearing assassination, he changed his name to David Stein and went underground. Perhaps this fear explains why Israel Shamir, and Chomsky, who surely know the truth, will not publicly “deny” it. Neither will Norman Finkelstein, whose father and mother were in Auschwitz and came out alive. Alive! Why weren’t they gassed by the homicidal Germans? Or Primo Levi, who wrote If This Be a Man, about his stay in Auschwitz, a wonderful book describing the miseries of concentration camp life but does not mention gas chambers, was hospitalized toward the end of the war. What was a hospital doing in a camp devoted to gassing Jews? Oh, there was also a maternity ward there, hundreds of babies were born. Babies were born! What were those homicidal Germans thinking! Primo Levi, by the way, is said to have committed suicide by jumping down the stairway of his 6th floor apartment in Italy. It could be dangerous for a Jew not to agree with the Exterminationists.

  34. Spect3r says:
    @MarkU

    “Without medical care”

    You mean like the father of Anne Frank that was taken to a hospital INSIDE a concentration camp?
    Or do you mean all the prisioners (jewish people included) that were in the hospital at Auschwitz?

    • Replies: @MarkU
  35. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:

    News:
    all holocaust memorials, statues, fiction, and more
    will have to close, be removed, etc.
    Yids were linked to the slave trade and slavery and worse.
    Parliament will have to close.

  36. MarkU says:
    @Mulegino1

    Well, your suspicions are ill founded

    OK, if my suspicions were incorrect then fair enough and if that is the case then you are due an apology.

    No Jew was murdered as a result of this policy simply for being a Jew.

    An unprovable absolute that is not likely to be realistic under the circumstances even using the most charitable of definitions.

    The overwhelming majority of all of the deaths in the camps occurred in the last few weeks of the war, when much of Germany had been reduced to rubble and its transportation and supply grids completely destroyed.

    That is certainly my impression and I have never argued otherwise. However the fact remains that they died because they were in the camps and they were in the camps solely because of ethnicity for the most part at least. In my books if you incarcerate people then you are responsible for their welfare.

    One assumes that the First Amendment to the Constitution is still in force.

    Seriously?

  37. Saggy says: • Website
    @Fool's Paradise

    You’re wrong about Finkelstein and Chomsky, both are vigorous promoters of the hoax. Here is Finkelstein at U. Waterloo

    My father was in Auschwitz
    My mother was in Majdanek
    Every single member of my family, on my father’s side and on my mother’s side, was exterminated.

    It was a miracle as Finklestein was born in 1953 !

    Chomsky is the most vicious proponent of the hoax …..

    “I described the Holocaust years ago as the most fantastic outburst of insanity in human history, so much so that if we even agree to discuss the matter we demean ourselves.”

    Going back years, I am absolutely certain that I’ve taken far more extreme postitions on people who deny the Holocaust than you have. For example, you go back to my earliest articles and you will find that I say that even to enter into the arena of debate on the question of whether the Nazis carried out such atrocities is already to lose one’s humanity. So I don’t even think you ought to discuss the issue if you want my opinion. But if anybody wants to refute Faurisson there’s certainly no difficulty in doing so.

    The Holocaust was the most extreme atrocity in human history, and we lose our humanity if we are even willing to enter the arena of debate with those who seek to deny or underplay Nazi crimes.

    By entering into the arena of argument and counterargument, of technical feasibility and tactics, of footnotes and citations, by accepting the presumption of legitimacy of debate on certain issues, one has already lost one’s humanity.

    Levi changed his story in later years ….

    Gas chambers and crematories were deliberately planned to destroy lives and human bodies on a scale of millions. The appalling record belongs to Auschwitz, with 24,000 dead in a single day, in August 1944.

    I have corresponded with Atzmon and Chomsky on the subject btw. The only truthful Jews that I am aware of are R. Unz and especially Gerhard Menuhin.

    • Replies: @Fool's Paradise
  38. MarkU says:
    @Spect3r

    OK, fair enough, without adequate medical care, happy now?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @anon
  39. @Fool's Paradise

    Fool’s Paradise—In addition, Holocaust denial is a criminal offence in much of Europe. Mr Atzmon has to watch his words in order to continue travelling freely around the Continent.

  40. macilrae says:
    @Fool's Paradise

    Totally agree. It is very easy to make ‘bold’ statements on here under an assumed name – pretty dicey to do so if you are standing up in plain sight.

    However, for those who rant under a pseudonym, don’t be so sure you can’t be identified!

  41. @MarkU

    but I suspect strongly that you and Mulegrino1 are false flagging

    Hey, why am I being left out of this? I agree with them and you probably do as well…

    Saggy said,

    The number of Jews that died in the camps for being Jews is zero.

    You wrote,

    along with communists, socialists, trade unionists, Gypsies, homosexuals, Jehovah’s witnesses and many others.

    And you are correct there.

    Here Trotsky is saying that the Bolshies need to counter the Nazi counter revolution. He’s wordy, turgid and sappily grandiloquent. Talking tough. What a simple jackass. Too bad he wasn’t sent to a camp, but then if he were, he probably wouldn’t have had an ice-pick implant.

    National Socialism cannot fall of itself. It must be overthrown. The changing of the political regime in present-day Germany cannot be realized without an insurrection.

    -Leon Trotsky, How Long Can Hitler Stay?

    Many Jews collaborated with the Nazis and any Jews sent to the camps were sent there primarily because they were Red agitators or likely agitators, not because they were Jews.

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  42. @Marvelous Goy

    Agree button already used.

    Today’s Zionist sympathizers, including the neocons, tRump, Netanyahoo, and other dupes, will be sacrificed without remorse when and if necessary. They’ll be given no more consideration than used tissue paper.

  43. @Jacques Sheete

    Here’s the link to the article I quoted.

    -Leon Trotsky, How Long Can Hitler Stay?

  44. @Saggy

    He sounds like he’s quoting the Protocols, which, of course, just hafta be fake. 🙂

  45. MarkU says:
    @Saggy

    Don’t you see a contradiction in saying ” The idea that Jews were killed in the camps for being Jews is not only false, it is absurd”

    Immediately after “To the particulars of prisoners killed in the camps, the fact is that the Nazis aggressively investigated crime in the camps by the SS, and it is well documented” (One is tempted to wonder exactly what crimes the SS committed)

    It is one thing to claim that something wasn’t official policy and quite another to claim that it didn’t happen. Your statement..

    The number of Jews that died in the camps for being Jews is zero.

    Is the only reason I got into this argument in the first place. What purpose does it serve, when dealing with an already highly controversial subject, to adopt an unnecessarily extreme stance or make absolutist statements of that type, especially easily refuted ones?

    They died because they were in the camps, the reason they were in the camps was (usually) solely because of their ethnicity, therefore they died in the camps for being Jews.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Saggy
  46. @Saggy

    Who are the masters and arbiters of the moral universe who are going to “close down” this site?

    That’s easy to answer: the Jews. Just ask Andrew Anglin.

    CORRECT!!!

    DAILYSTORMER.NAME – accurately self proclaimed as the most censored site on the net.

  47. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Rule of Lawyers than Rule of Law.

  48. Wally says:
    @MarkU

    said:
    “They died because they were in the camps, the reason they were in the camps was (usually) solely because of their ethnicity, therefore they died in the camps for being Jews.”

    Nope, the word is ‘intent’. Jews and others, including German staff, who died of disease did so because of disease. There was no intention to kill them.
    The facts are that Allied bombing & strafing of civilian transports of medical & food supplies into the camps were a huge factor in causing such deaths.

    Using your logic, or lack of, Japanese-Americans who died in massive US concentration camps did so because of their ethnicity, therefore they died in the camps for being Japanese-Americans.

    I also suggest a look at Eisenhower’s POW death camps and the Soviet gulags for Germans which you predictably ignore.
    see:
    http://www.unz.com/article/debunking-myths-of-red-brown-alliances/?highlight=eisenhower#comment-3183169
    plus:
    In “Eisenhower’s Death Camps”: Part I, A U.S. Prison Guard’s Story, by Martin Brech :
    https://codoh.com/library/document/2281/?lang=en
    Other Losses, book review, by Arthur S. Ward : https://codoh.com/library/document/2293/?lang=en

  49. @Saggy

    Thanks, Saggy, things I’d read by and about Chomsky and Finkelstein gave me the impression that they were not keen on throwing their weight behind the 6 million hoax. I guess I was wrong. Gerard Menuhin (not officially a Jew, since his mother wasn’t) wrote a terrific book, Tell The Truth and Shame the Devil, and, it is said of him, that he distrusts all Jews. And yes, I’d heard that in later editions Primo Levi did mention gas chambers, but in the edition I read he didn’t. Committed suicide? One wonders.

  50. Saggy says: • Website
    @MarkU

    The number of Jews that died in the camps for being Jews is zero.

    Actually, I should have written (and usually do write, it’s a standard trope for me) …

    The number of Jews that were killed in the camps for being Jews is zero.

    The reason for writing it is that it is a fact. The holohoax is not only a lie, it is preposterous.

  51. Wally says:
    @MarkU

    What makes you think that the medical care was intended to be inadequate?


    The stationary high frequency delousing facility at the Auschwitz concentration camp, shown in a 1944 photograph.

    recommended for the hospital facilities at Auschwitz:

    High Frequency Delousing Facilities at Auschwitz, German ‘Microwave’ Technology to Combat Typhus : https://codoh.com/library/document/2820/?lang=en

    An Atrocity Against History, and the People, By Arthur R. Butz : https://codoh.com/library/document/1106/?lang=en
    exc:
    “Wiesel relates in Ch. 5 of Night that, when his foot became swollen he went to the camp hospital which “was not bad at all” for an operation on it. Shortly after the operation, while he was still in the hospital, the approach of the Soviets made the evacuation of the camp imminent. He had the option of staying in the hospital, with his father entered as a patient or nurse, but he chose rather that both join the evacuation,”

    much more: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=auschwitz+hospital

  52. Oh, I forgot to mention that Gerard Menuhin’s father was Yehudi Menuhin, the great American violinist (they’re a California family) who was not a Zionist, and in fact Gerard comes from a family of righteous Jews. His grandfather was a rabbi in Palestine who lived in peaceful friendship with his Arab neighbors, who was dismayed and angry when European Zionists began moving in and mistreating the natives. Not only angry, but outspoken, he wrote and criticized. I think his book is extant somewhere.

    Gerard’s father, Yehudi, wrote a candid and interesting autobiography, from his prodigy boyhood to his maturity when, it seems, he knew everybody in the world worth knowing.

  53. anon[250] • Disclaimer says:
    @MarkU

    do you complain about inadequate medical care by the Soviets?

  54. I, for one, approve of this holocaust memorial. Even though British men fought their ethnic cousins to end the Third Reich, and earlier fought the Arabs and Turks to secure Palestine for their Jewish overlords, they deserve to have the constant reminder of the most important value in western society: the moral supremacy of the Jews and their genocide at the hands of someone else.

    I guess we can only look forward to the day when the Muslim population of London tears it down.

  55. Ram says:

    Is this the US Cabinet, or is the President a captive ?

    • Replies: @anon
  56. Franz says:
    @MarkU

    I find it hard to believe that Gilad Atzmon truly believes that Israel is the true source of all that political influence.

    I’d put it down as only a slight overstatement.

    Simply to mention the deep state begs the question which part of it has the last say and the biggest wallet. Still Israel. No state governor in the US, provincial representative in Canada or British MP can match the fiscal firepower of any national Zionist organization if they object. Check all three nations and see: They can’t.

    Yes it’s more than “only” Israel, but Izzy is the big dog in the pack right now.

    Atzman’s 99 percent right, okay by me.

  57. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ram

    just saw a similar pic
    reagan had same or similar minyan of ghouls around him

  58. Floki says:
    @Paw

    Or a “cohen”cidence?

  59. There’s a very sad backstory to this. Building a holocaust memorial on the site will mean the destruction of a memorial commemorating the abolition of slavery within the British empire, something that was of no little importance in the advancement of mankind. Is it coincidence that something of national significance, something that buttresses a positive British national identity, is going to be replaced by a globalist totem? Didn’t the bible enjoin the Israelites not to worship the golden calf? Are holocaust memorials becoming the golden calves of our day? The slave trade was wrong, slavery is wrong. Erasing a monument that recognises this can’t be right.

  60. Its the good thing the Saudi’s aren’t as good as Israel at buying British MP’s. Otherwise, you’d have Westminster sandwiched in-between a Mosque and a Holocaust Museum. BTW, maybe someone in London can build a museum commemorating the 264,000 Englishmen who Died in WW2 and the 700,000 who died in WW 1.

  61. anon[354] • Disclaimer says:

    maybe someone in London can build a museum commemorating the 264,000 Englishmen who Died in WW2 and the 700,000 who died in WW 1.

    wow, what a slaughter

    also France 1.3 million, Austria 1.2 million, Russia 1.7, Germany 1.7 and those are just the deaths, injuries were about 3-4x higher

  62. FLgeezer says:

    Have You heard of the “Justice for Uncompensated Survivors Today Act”?
    No? Me either.
    ———————————————
    From the Associated Press:

    WARSAW Poland –
    Thousands of Polish nationalists marched to the U.S. Embassy in Warsaw Saturday, protesting
    that the U.S. is putting pressure on Poland to compensate Jews whose families lost property
    In the Holocaust.
    The protest took place amid a rise in anti-Semitic hate speech in public life in Poland and it
    appeared to be one of the largest anti-Jewish street demonstrations in recent times.
    The protests in Warsaw target the Justice for Uncompensated Survivors Today Act. It was
    signed into law by President Donald Trump last year and requires the State Department to
    report on the state of restitution of Jewish property stolen in the Holocaust in dozens of lands.
    At least two U.S. Confederate flags were visible in the protest. The protestors shouted “This
    Is Poland, not Polin,” using the Hebrew word for Poland.
    ————————————————-
    The Jews have been extorting compensation from the hapless Germans for 70 years, and
    now wish to inflict their parasitism on “dozens of lands”. And our State Department is
    using our tax dollars to insure that it happens. The good Catholic people of
    Poland are waking up. What will it take for Americans to do so?

  63. @Mulegino1

    …while National Socialist Germany did have what could be styled as an anti-Jewish policy, it was both far more humane and equitable than was previously thought, and did not entail the murder of Jews simply for being Jews. No Jew was murdered as a result of this policy simply for being a Jew. No one claims that no Jews died in German camps, but their deaths, apart from those due to natural mortality, were directly attributable to the depredations of war and their concomitants such as disease, shortages of food and medical supplies, lack of sanitation, etc.

    Apparently the German National Socialists complied with The Roman Catholic Church’s Sicut Judaeis doctrine as best could be done in wartime where internment was necessary due to Jew affiliation with the enemy the Bolshevik Jew Soviets just as internment of Japanese in the US during the war was necessary.

  64. Dennis Dale says: • Website

    Are you kidding? The problem with the Holocaust memorial is it isn’t condemnatory enough of the British?

    Are you kidding?

    • Replies: @anon
  65. Dennis Dale says: • Website

    Our salvation begins when the first of these museums comes down.

  66. anon[194] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dennis Dale

    it’s the jews’ way of saying thanks for you dumbshits wasting all your lives defeating Hitler for them

  67. Robjil says:
    @Ray P

    February 28 1991 was Purim day for that Turkey shoot. The first Iraq war ended on Purim day. The second Iraq war started on Purim day. The Libya war started on Purim day. Well, people in power in the worst-than, former western, world are 500 BC Old Testament fanatics.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gilad Atzmon Comments via RSS