The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGilad Atzmon Archive
Where Comedy Ends and Hasbara Begins
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Two days ago at the ADL conference Jewish Zionist comedian Sacha Baron Cohen criticised the internet and social media companies for allowing freedom of speech. This grotesque character who has made a career of marginalising oppressed minorities by depicting stereotypical characters and then ridiculing them is now calling on social media to adopt gag orders and to move us further into an Orwellian realm.

Galvanized by the support it received from the Jewish comedian, the ADL is now demanding that 10 social media accounts “should be removed immediately.”

For one reason or another I am included on the list. I need not mention that I have never been charged with any crime let alone a hate crime. I’ve never once been questioned by a single law enforcement body anywhere in the world. This does not stop the ADL from writing of me: “Gilad Atzmon is an anti-Semitic author and musician who describes himself as an ‘ex-Israeli’ and an ‘ex-Jew.’

I am indeed an ex Israeli and ex Jew and I am also a musician. However, I deny the accusation of anti-Semitism, I have never criticized Jews, or anyone else for the matter, as ‘a people,’ as ‘a race,’ as ‘a biology’ or as ‘an ethnicity.’ In fact, for my entire life I have opposed all forms of racism and this includes Jewish racism. I do criticise Jewish identitarian politics and some aspects of Jewish culture and ideology. I grew up in Israel and as far as I can remember, in the Jewish state, criticism of culture, ideology and politics is considered a perfectly kosher activity.

The ADL says of me that I am an “outspoken promoter of classic anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.” This is an absurd lie as I have repeatedly argued that there are no Jewish conspiracies since it is all done in the open: from Epstein’s Lolita Express, to Israeli war crimes, to advocacy of Zioncon global conflicts and plans for an ‘New American Century.’ The UK chief rabbi’s call for Brits to turn their backs on their opposition party is not exactly a conspiratorial clandestine move, it is actually mainstream news in Britain this morning. There are no Jewish conspiracies, what happens takes place in front of our eyes but we cannot discuss it because Jewish power, as I define it, is the power to suppress criticism of Jewish power.

From then on, what the ADL says about me is somewhat accurate. He is “a fierce critic of Jewish identity.” I am.

ORDER IT NOW

“He has written that ‘Jewish ideological, political, and cultural discourse is…foreign to universalism and ideas of true equality.’ My exact words can be found here. What I say is “We must find a way to admit to ourselves that the Jewish ideological, political and cultural discourse is a tribal discourse: it is foreign to universalism and ideas of true equality.” Here the ADL is engaged in a rather obvious attempt to deceive. In my original text, being ‘foreign to universalism and true equality’ elucidates the notion of tribal discourse. You may wonder why the ADL acts in a duplicitous manner.

The ADL complains that “although Atzmon frequently attacks Zionism, he has also argued that Zionism itself was originally a ‘universalist and humanist’ movement which was ‘hijacked by Judaism.’ In fact, this is exactly what I argue and I wonder, where exactly is the ‘crime?’ The battle between ‘the Israeli’ and ‘the Jew’ was at the centre of the Israeli political debate in the last election. Am I guilty of identifying the core of Israel’s identity crisis a decade before anyone else?

Finally the ADL complains that I say of Israel that it is a “tyranny inspired by a deep Talmudic intolerance.” I am afraid that the Israeli National Bill is the materialisation of the above. I think I remember that the ADL’s Abe Foxman also wasn’t pleased with Israel’s National Bill for pretty much the same reasons. Is the ADL going to ask to delete his twitter account?

Sooner or later we will have to examine the question whether the relentless attack by Jewish institutions on freedom of speech, 1st amendments and the core Western ethos has been ‘good for the Jews.’

(Republished from Gilad Atzmon by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: ADL, Censorship, Jews, Sacha Baron Cohen, Zionism 
Hide 73 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Wade says:

    I saw Sacha Baron Cohen’s speech. It made me cringe. Thanks for speaking up for traditional American freedoms, Gilad! Have a great thanksgiving (if you celebrate it)!

    • Agree: Irish Savant
  2. jsigur says:

    I get what you mean but Jewish behind the curtain behavior assures that most ppl don’t find out what they are really doing . By controlling the mainstream press and using good looking men and women in fancy wear to do their misdirecting for them, no big blunder is ripe for exposing. Twenty years of 911 truth has shown that. Censuring any real discussion about holocaust revisionism is another. Lumping Sandy Hook in with holocaust denial assures that their recent staged plays pass for real events

    • Agree: Irish Savant
  3. PPB says:

    I’m surprised they couldn’t find a more suitable mouthpiece than that Borat guy. I suppose Groucho Marx, were he still alive, would have come across as too human-hearted.

    But maybe this isn’t a surprise after all, given much of the recent ranting by two-bit celebrities who try to tell the rest of us what we should be thinking and doing, as though their public profile rendered them credible by definition.

    But getting back to Gilad’s argument– maybe it’s precisely his subtlety of insight and his ability to find a receptive audience too astute to be taken in by celebrity garbage– that makes him an obstacle to the agenda of certain vested interests, far more so than anyone spewing crude antisemitism would be. It’s easy to counter someone who’s approaching you at a 180 degree angle, but not so much if their angle of approach is more oblique, and comes from underneath as well as from the sides.

  4. Lot says:

    Ron Unz keeps complaining the ADL refuses to attack him by name.

    Now we know why: he doesn’t have his own popular Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

    He may also need to consider that in 2019, few people read 27,000 word self published website essays. Switch to Twitter! He can be every WN and Neonazi’s one Jewish friend.

  5. Wally says:
    @Lot

    – Poor Lot, so very frustrated by the fact that he been made a fool of when he tries to debate “holocaust” revisionists at this site, hence his childish Greta Thunberg act towards Ron Unz.

    – It also quite apparent that The Unz Review is in fact making a difference, and that’s why lowbrow characters such as Lot are here ranting & raving about the exposure that criminals like the ADL and the laughably impossible claims his “holocaust” narrative are receiving.

    – Lot is further proof that Zionism is in deep trouble.

    The tide is turning

    • Replies: @Lot
  6. AaronB says:
    @PPB

    Now this is much better.

    Glad you’ve come put into the open 🙂

    We welcome snti-Semites here, and we are happy that you have openly joined our little group of spirited debaters.

    Your old pose of not taking sides was, frankly, boring, and not well done.

    Honestly embrace who you are and take a side – don’t sneak around in the shadows like some coward. It never works, and makes you look pathetic.

  7. Gall says:

    Title says it all. As the old saying goes “first there’s then there’s that”. Cohen is just another Hasbera Clown. I think his best effort at comedy was when he accepted ADL’s award. Too bad he was serious.

    Not a big fan of Zuck’s FakeBook but he is less stringent on repressing freedom of speech than twatter which is a joke. I’m sure Ron would be listed right up there with other “antisemites” if he had an account there. It seems like Gilad all one has to do is point out what falsely claims to be the only “democracy” in the Middle East despite the fact that Lebanon, Syria, Iran and Iraq all hold somewhat free and fair elections that don’t exclude anyone unlike Israel which excludes about 75% of the population.

    Now they’re trying to undermine free speech in this country through their Intelligence arm the ADL.

  8. Hm. Well, I’ll refrain from chasing the rat around the basement one more time for the moment.

    What can we do to help, Gilad?

  9. Lot says:
    @Wally

    “ Poor Lot, so very frustrated by the fact that he been made a fool of when he tries to debate “holocaust” revisionists at this site, ”

    You are confusing me with someone else. I’ve never debated holocaust revisionism because I think you all are either retards or just insincere antisemitic trolls. Either way, not worth the effort.

    Moreover, I’d like to see Jews abandon the morbid and degrading “we’re the biggest victims” game. It isn’t one Jews can win now, nor really anytime other than 1935-1945.

    Though he overstates it, Norman Finkelstein does have a point.

    • Agree: AaronB
    • Replies: @Gall
  10. PPB says:
    @AaronB

    Now please tell me how the words I posted amount to antisemitism or express any agreement whatsover with Gilad’s positions or arguments. You continue to read all sorts of things into what I actually write. My post addressed the dynamics of political argumentation– call it “propaganda” if you don’t like a particular form of it– and not who’s right or who’s wrong in some debate about Jews or Judaism. For what it’s worth, I find some of Gilad’s arguments valid at least to a degree, while at other times he seems to me to overstate his case, or try too hard to build a case from insufficiently compelling evidence. What my post did do, however, is express admiration for Gilad’s intelligence (and here I should also add his musical intelligence), regardless of whether or not I agree with the conclusions that his reasoning serves. However, I suppose that one of the skills of an accomplished jazz musician is to occasionally hit the “wrong” notes but still make them sound “right”.

    If you have any doubts about my positions, I can confirm that I firmly support the right to free speech, and that I have no particular admiration for the ADL or its methods. However, this antipathy does not extend to my attitude towards Judaism or Jews in general, however much you seem incapable of getting your head arond that notion, and however often I’ve stated that I’ve liked most of the many Jews that I’ve known or met– often very much so– and hardly view Jews as a monolithic group. For me to be a so-called Jew-hater under those circumstances, and with that amount of direct experience, would require me to maintain a degree of cognitive dissonance that I can scarcely fathom. Maybe I can let you know more about that when my wife and I return from Thanksgiving dinner at our Jewish friends and neighbors and let you know about all the horrible personality clashes and other disagreements we had. 🙂

    I have now more than once begun to sense that you have a need to angrily and summarily reject whatever doesn’t fit within your black-and-white scheme of understanding. A first step might be to view some of those seemingly hostile concepts as ones that are simply foreign to you, rather than as ones that represent anything close to the polar opposite of the values that you hold dear.

    Again for what it’s worth, my interest in Jewishnesss stems primarily from the fact that because Jews are a tightly-knit and generally endogamous but geographically dispersed people, Jews make a perfect case study for the formation of group identity, an issue that I’ve been fascinated since from my youth. During my student days, my primary interest became focused on what the German philosopher Karl Jaspers termed “the psychology of world views”. In its most encompassing form, this complex dynamic draws in elements of developmental and social psychology, religion, geography, history, politics, economics and technology, as well other lesser formative influences. Not only do I still find this observation and study fascinating in the abstract, but it also provides a mirror in which one can observe not only one’s own environmentally-based conditioning, but also the degree to which that conditioning functions to limit and distort one’s sense of reality– and the impersonal pronoun in this sentence refers to all of us, not just Jews 🙂

  11. Sacha Baron Cohen: a disgusting, repulsive, IMMORAL Jew -who hid behind his Jewishness to bend over and spray feces at everyone else – now demands that we all cease commenting on how disgusting, repulsive and immoral Jews are.

    [email protected] YOU Cohen. You Jew POS.

    • Agree: Druid
  12. @Lot

    Cry me a river you POS.

    • Agree: Druid
  13. @AaronB

    Go whinge to your transgendered gopher.
    We don’t care, Hebe.

  14. This is actually good PR, Mr. Atzmon.

    The old tactics of silencing dissent have become transparent. As such, the ADL’s nod is likely to increase your following significantly.

    Mabruk!

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  15. @AnonStarter

    ‘This is actually good PR, Mr. Atzmon.’

    Atzmon would probably prefer that someone else garnered the PR.

    Martyrdom can be good for the cause — but it’s uncomfortable for the martyr.

    It’s interesting that Atzmon is so singled out, though. That’s of significance. His ideas are actually pretty arcane.

    I think it’s because he’s Jewish — a traitor to the tribe. Most intelligent Jews just keep quiet or mumble something to appease the beast. Atzmon’s baited the dragon in his lair.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    , @Daniel Rich
  16. I used to enjoy Cohen’s outrageous satirical comedy. Now I know he’s the worst sort of hypocrite. Thou shalt not criticize the Tribe. Nor shall one tell the truth about Replacement or Invasion. The only true statement in Cohen’s speech is “There is such a thing as objective reality.” Of course, he wants to outlaw that reality.

  17. renfro says:

    Sooner or later we will have to examine the question whether the relentless attack by Jewish institutions on freedom of speech, 1st amendments and the core Western ethos has been ‘good for the Jews.’

    They never have and they will never figure out the downside of trying to suppress criticism or debate on Israel or Jews or Zionism . And when their attempts to marginalize and control ‘the others ‘ backlashes on them they will claim its anti semitism and their innocence of any wrong doing.
    Same old, same old.

    Never Learn…..even after 2000 years of the same mistakes.

  18. @Colin Wright

    /Martyrdom can be good for the cause — but it’s uncomfortable for the martyr./

    Indeed, it can be, though such is the circumstance in which he’s compelled to struggle. Orwell’s maxim that truth-telling in a time of universal deceit is revolutionary applies to the truth that Gilad tells. Censure is an inevitable feature of the contemporary battleground on which this war is waged, and any brave enough to speak truth to power are aware of the potential consequences before they even lift a finger above the keyboard.

    /I think it’s because he’s Jewish — a traitor to the tribe./

    Well, there are a few Jews out there who are highly critical of Israel, yet didn’t make the list (e.g. Norman Finkelstein, Sheldon Richman). Mr. Atzmon, however, has more directly addressed matters likely to incite reaction, such as the well documented history of sexual perversion in Jewish culture as a means of understanding the depredations of Jeffery Epstein. I mean, you don’t even have to touch the Mossad honeypot angle to get a rise out of the ADL with that particular article.

    I’d say he’s a bolder man, more willing to address topics that others “traitors” won’t touch with a ten-foot staff. He’s particularly threatening to the usual suspects because he’s ripped the mask clean off the face of hypocritical human rights organizations and other parties whose demonstration of support for Palestine is just that: a demonstration and no more.

    Israel Shamir has done this as well and he has also made the list. Mr. Shamir has promoted the work of Rabbi Ariel Toaff, which provides evidence that the so-called “blood libel” isn’t quite libelous after all. This would surely raise their dander.

    Yes, their identity is certainly a factor, but their material really stands apart from the rest of the crowd as more courageous. They may not see it as such, but there it is.

    Kevin Barrett is listed as well. In his case, it’s being Muslim and asserting Israeli responsibility for 9/11. Two unforgivable sins.

  19. anonymous[384] • Disclaimer says:

    Atzmon is still a Jew. There is no such thing as an ex-Jew any more than being an ex-Chinese!

  20. @Colin Wright

    It’s interesting that Atzmon is so singled out, though. That’s of significance. His ideas are actually pretty arcane.

    If you rub the tribe the wrong way it doesn’t matter how Jewish you are [think the termination of Finkelstein’s tenure]. Gilad also states he’s an ex-Israeli and ex-Jew, so that makes him an ‘outsider [aka self-hating Jew]’ and an even easier target.

    What ‘we’ should do is harass both the ADL and Sasha by sending emails and/or letters. Let them know Gilad doesn’t stand alone in his fight. Members of the UR readership are on his side [not all, of course, but enough to make a difference.

    Contact ADL

    Contact Sacha Baron Cohen – Facebook

    Contact Sacha Baron Cohen – Twitter

    Contact Sacha Baron Cohen – IMDbPro [needs a 30 day trial]

    Bite/fight back [with a vengeance].

  21. Biff says:

    Sacha Baron Cohen criticised the internet and social media companies for allowing freedom of speech. This grotesque character who has made a career of marginalising oppressed minorities by depicting stereotypical characters and then ridiculing them is now calling on social media to adopt gag orders and to move us further into an Orwellian realm.

    Hard to believe he actually this dumb. I’m still a bit split on whether he was put up to it; he wanted to join this league; he’s faking it(another persona/character); or he is really this dumb?

    ????

    • Replies: @utu
  22. utu says:
    @Biff

    “…he is really his dumb?” – Many Jews with high operational intelligence suffer from the self-awareness deficit when it concerns the tribal interest. It is a strength like any hubris but up to the point when it ain’t.

  23. BuelahMan says:

    Am I the only one hoping that Sacha Baron Cohen gets thrown down his well?

  24. utu says:

    Where comedy ends. There is nothing funny about the religion of peace.

    “Heretics, traitors and apostates are to be thrown into a well and not rescued.” – Abhodah Zarah (26b)

    “A spy is to be killed, even in our days, wherever he is found. He may be killed even before he confesses. And even if he admits that he only intended to do harm to somebody, and if the harm which he intended is not very great, it is sufficient to have him condemned to death. He must be warned, however, not to confess to this. But if he impudently says ‘No, I will confess it!’ then he must be killed, and the sooner the better. If there is no time to warn him, it is not necessary to do so. There are some who say that a traitor is to be put to death only when it is impossible to get rid of him by mutilating him, that is, by cutting out his tongue or his eyes, but if this can be done he must not be killed, since he is not any worse than others who persecute us.” – Choschen Hammischpat (388,10)

    “If it can be proved that someone has betrayed Israel three times, or has given the money of Israelites to the Akum, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth.” – Choschen Hamm (388,15)

    “Rabbi Jochanan says: A Goi who pries into the Law is guilty to death.” – Sanhedrin (59a)

    ” But Israelites also, who lapse from their religion and become epicureans, are to be killed, and we must persecute them to the end. For they afflict Israel and turn the people from God.” – Hilkhoth Akum (X, 2)

    “Renegades who turn to the pleasures of the Akum, and who become contaminated with them by worshipping stars and planets as they do, are to be killed.” – Iore Dea (158,2 Hagah)

    ” those who deny the Torah and the Prophets of Israel—the law is that all those should be killed; and those who have the power of life and death should have them killed; and if this cannot be done, they should be led to their death by deceptive methods.” – Choschen Hamm. (425,5)

    “The People of the Earth are idolaters, and it has been written about them: Let them be wiped off the face of the earth. Destroy the memory of the Amalekites. They are with us still in this Fourth Captivity, namely, the Princes [of Rome] . . . who are really Amalakites.” – Zohar (I,25a)

    “Even the best of the Goim should be killed” – Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth)

    “Take the life of the Kliphoth and kill them, and you will please God the same as one who offers incense to Him.” – Sepher Or Israel (177b)

    “Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God.” – Ialkut Simoni (245c. n. 772)

    “The only sacrifice required is that we remove the unclean from amongst us.” – Zohar (III,227b)

    “In places where Jews are strong, no idolater must be allowed to remain…” – Hilkhoth Akum (X, 7)

    http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter15.htm

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @AnonStarter
  25. Anonymous[223] • Disclaimer says:

    I notice that a lot of right wing Christians are starting to mimic the ethno-religious outlook of Jews. I increasingly hear people on the right say that Western countries should prioritise “Christian refugees” and that we should be concerned first and foremost for our fellow Christians abroad.

    I increasingly hear the term “Christian” used almost as if it were a racial label, in the same way “Jew” is.

  26. Truth3 says:

    Self Chosen example of the Day…

  27. @anonymous

    Atzmon is still a Jew. There is no such thing as an ex-Jew any more than being an ex-Chinese!

    If you want to say that he still has the same DNA he had when he was born, you are right. But otherwise you are wrong. He’s now a European citizen who gave up his identification as a citizen of his original country or religion. As a European citizen he is himself and not a representant of any religion or even a group that may want to define itself “ethnically” or religiously.

    • Agree: Irish Savant
    • Replies: @jsigur
  28. Thanks for the ADL censorship decree! It’s hard to keep up with this frantic last-ditch flurry of premodern heresy edicts. There are a couple names there I’m not familiar with. Now I can check them out on the web (but not on social media, that’s automated mind control; and not on google, on yandex.com or searx.me or lite.quant.com or metager.de or startpage.com or https://3g2upl4pq6kufc4m.onion/html. Google is an inquisitor for Israel’s state religion.)

    Congratulations on the honor of being designated as a heresiarch by ADL, the foremost enemy of universal human rights worldwide.

  29. I grew up in Israel and as far as I can remember, in the Jewish state, criticism of culture, ideology and politics is considered a perfectly kosher activity.

    Yes, of course – in the Jewish state. Speak about Jews with other Jews, and no one will ever have a problem with it. You understand that and pretend it does not matter. You know this is not so, but ignore it.

    We must find a way to admit to ourselves that the Jewish ideological, political and cultural discourse is a tribal discourse: it is foreign to universalism.

    Tribal means national, does it not? How is it something that we must admit, as though it is a crime of some kind? This site is full of nationalist fanatics of the most extreme sort, and that is alright for them.

    But for Jews it should be a taboo?

    • Replies: @Tusk
  30. FUCK THE ADL. LONG LIVE FREEDOM.LONG LIVE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION.

  31. Tusk says:
    @Dr. Moreau's Biographer

    Your thinking is backwards. Other races aren’t filled with nationalism and denying Jews their piece, Jews have their nationalism and have worked to ensure the West doesn’t get theirs. Indeed, a person could admit to being a zionist and recieve no media attention whereas anyone who says they’re a nationalist gets cancelled. Nobody talks about Trumps zionistic love for Israel, but when he said he was a nationalist it became a big scandal.

  32. Anonymous[171] • Disclaimer says:

    Gilad, you already censor comments on your own website that don’t fit the narrative YOU want to spread. I remember posting a series of responses, which you selectively chose those that supported your point of view, and then erased those which did not fully support your point of view.

    If you’re going to be selective and suppressive about what your supposed comment section has, why shouldn’t others do the same with you? What goes around comes around. Don’t act like you wouldn’t do the same thing in their position because you already have. I don’t like certain groups randomly deciding who should be on the internet and who shouldn’t but you would have more credibility in complaining if you didn’t do the same things you accuse others of.

  33. Anon[774] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    We welcome snti-Semites here, and we are happy that you have openly joined our little group of spirited debaters.

    Who is “we”, idiot? You’re a marginalized Hasbara agent (Jewish Nationalist) here among a sea of Western White Nationalists on what is essentially a Western White Nationalist site. As the Jewish enabled American negroes would say “don’t get it twisted”.

    There is no debate here.

    Which the open content of the Jewish religion, the open statements of Jewish Rabbis, the long protest of Indo European groups against Jews, the bald Jewish Supremacist agenda of groups like the ADL, and the long documented history of Jewish group subversion against large groups of Indo Europeans (even within the articles printed by this website) all assure.

    Stating that there is a debate about Jews here is like stating that there is a debate about whether Smallpox or Ebola are bad for humanity.

    You guys copypasta the same tired lines that all Hasbara agents use across the internet, and that have long been put to bed. You are the equivalent of static: noise in the signal and about as relevant as gnats to human conversation.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  34. Truth3 says:
    @AaronB

    Aaron the Bastard and Franny the Bitch somehow think they play the tunes here.

    As to coward Aaron calling others cowardly… wow.

    Israeli snipers shooting kids with rocks trying to defend their grandmothers… now that’s a coward.

    But even more a coward… Hasbarites (((like Aaron B))) doing the dirty lies for his daily shekel quota. They facilitate the IDF cowards.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  35. @Truth3

    Your new boyfriend Truth? Common don’t be shy.

  36. @Anon

    all ditto to you. Tired and boring. WN lowest IQ’s in the entire universe.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  37. Anon[163] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    He doesn’t believe (or he says he doesn’t believe) in race and racial identity, thus he can say he is not a Jew having renounced citizenship and religious affiliation.

  38. lavoisier says: • Website

    I need not mention that I have never been charged with any crime let alone a hate crime.

    Sorry Gilad. Don’t hold your breath that this will continue.

    You have powerful enemies who would like nothing more than to charge you with a crime and put you in jail.

    And at the rate these people are able to buy off the whores in power, you should not rest easy.

  39. @utu

    ‘… ” those who deny the Torah and the Prophets of Israel—the law is that all those should be killed; and those who have the power of life and death should have them killed; and if this cannot be done, they should be led to their death by deceptive methods.” – Choschen Hamm. (425,5)

    “The People of the Earth are idolaters, and it has been written about them: Let them be wiped off the face of the earth. Destroy the memory of the Amalekites. They are with us still in this Fourth Captivity, namely, the Princes [of Rome] . . . who are really Amalakites.” – Zohar (I,25a)

    “Even the best of the Goim should be killed” – Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth)

    “In places where Jews are strong, no idolater must be allowed to remain…” – Hilkhoth Akum (X, 7)’

    I think these are examples of the tolerance Aaron generalized about.

  40. @Fran Taubman

    ‘… WN lowest IQ’s in the entire universe.’

    How about Jewish Nationalists?

  41. @Truth3

    ‘… Hasbarites (((like Aaron B))) doing the dirty lies for his daily shekel quota…’

    I’m pretty sure Aaron’s not being paid. It’d be nice if he was the best Israel could come up — but he ain’t.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  42. @utu

    /“Even the best of the Goim should be killed” – Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth)/

    The more precise rendering of that is in the imperative form: “The best of the goyim, kill him.”

    It’s either that or ensure he’s been compromised. Both constitute death, in any event.

  43. @PPB

    I didn’t read the full speech but my impression is that Borat guy said that Facebook, Google, YouTube etc would gladly take advertising from the Nazis, there’d be ads advocating “racial cleansing” endorsed by Goebbels or Goering etc., popping up on our screens. And I agree.

    Michael Moore, back when he was doing books, wrote a book full of pranks and hijinx he did, and one was writing checks to various politicians from groups he made up with the help of a local bank, that were purported pedophiles and other evil types, and all the politicians took the checks and cashed them just fine.

    He also goes to the park and swings on the swings with Jack Kevorkian, and comes up with props for Bob Dole to hold in his crippled hand; it’s a pretty fun read.

    Also far predating the established need for Depends if you work in an Amazon warehouse, he took a flatbed truck full of porta-potties around to a factory where women were having to use adult diapers because they were kept from being able to use the bathroom.

    • Replies: @PPB
    , @anarchyst
  44. Demjanjuk Affair was worse than Dreyfus Affair

  45. PPB says:
    @alex in San Jose AKA Digital Detroit

    I have no problem with a media organization rejecting advertising that they find offensive, particularly in the extreme cases that you mentioned, but legitimate principles are also easily invoked to justify their deliberate misapplication. What I was primarily deriding is the reliance of political and business interests on celebrities to communicate their message to the public, in this case a celebrity like Baron-Cohen, whose comedy, although clever at times, strikes me as too often condescending and mean-spirited for him to be the most persuasive spokesman the ADL could find. But if the ADL had instead put some ranter like Robert De Niro on stage, my reaction would no doubt have been far less positive, not that the ADL would have actually had the poor sense to go that far.

    And yes, I do think the ADL has gone well beyond the bounds of any appropriate role it might have initially played in accordance with its label as an Anti-Defamation League, having now in many ways become more of a cudgel than a brake. If I feel similarly about the role that some U.S. regulatory agencies have adopted, does that make me anti-American?

  46. @Colin Wright

    He sure the duck beats Truth with his foreskin a la Hannibal Lecture get my point? Cannibalism not on the menu

  47. PPB says:

    Somehow this comment evokes the image of a foreskin turducken.

    Happy Thanksgiving, Everyone— feast and be merry!

  48. Truth3 says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Come on is two words Bitch. Common means ordinary.

    You and your kind (for example the two Orthodox beauties photo) are the most vile creatures on the planet… and not just on the outside. Your insides (mind heart soul, if you had one) are worse still. Murderous Thieving Lying Bastards and Bitches all.

    Obviously my comment on your inability to find a suitable JDate hit a nerve. Hope it still buzzes. Sort of like the foreskins you chew on.

    Oh wow… found your Facebook image…

    https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.tNyMz_vYGQNXXQ8k1qBwjgHaFO&pid=Api&P=0&w=265&h=188

    • Replies: @PPB
  49. PPB says:
    @Truth3

    In all fairness, English isn’t everyone’s first language, and the rest of your comment has no redeeming value, besides falling squarely into the “Troll” category. Debate based on fact, reason and universally-accepted morality is fine, but this brand of degrading insult pollutes the forum, taints legitimate criticism, and ends up demeaning its writer more than its target.

    • Replies: @Truth3
  50. Truth3 says:
    @PPB

    Go back and look at the history bozo.

  51. PPB says:

    About as far as I’ll support your position regarding Fran is that she often (in my mind, and whether willfully or innocently) conflates the nobler Jewish ideals with the reality on the ground, somewhat analogous to the way that certain American propagandists have used and distorted the nobler ideals behind the American Revolution and Constitution to justify and promote destructive foreign wars.

    Although I can empathize with Fran’s reverence for the purer Jewish ideals, such reverence often comes at the cost of failing to recognize or admit the existence of not only the sheer dross but also the darker elements present within every larger culture, including whatever happens to be one’s own.

    While in some cultures a darker undercurrent may find more overt expression than in others, even in those other cultures any random and unanticipated catalyst can easily bring that darkness into the open, as we’ve seen many, many times if we do in fact “go back and look at the history”.

    • Replies: @Truth3
  52. Truth3 says:
    @PPB

    Empathize all you want with a sock puppet (Fran / Linda / Anon) liar defender of Jewish Criminal activity.

    Pure and Noble? Jewish ideals? What a crock.

    It shows what you are. How was your bris to join the tribe? Painful? Good.

  53. anaccount says:

    Sacha Baren Cohen is the face of Jewish privilege.

    Thankfully, even a Nation of Islam spear chucker can figure out who is really in charge (and has been for sometime). I think this scares them even more than Trump’s election.

  54. @Fran Taubman

    Kinda looks like your grandson hey Frau Taubman?
    I guess that’s what happens when uncles marry nieces and cousins marry cousins. Quite common among AshCanNazis along with, as you amply display, numerous forums of mental illness, such as paranoid schizophrenia and manic depression.
    Time for some meds Fraulein?

  55. @Truth3

    That’s Lot and his brother Pot.

  56. @Gilad, excellent article. You should be proud that you are on this list. Kudos from Norway!

  57. bjondo says:

    Benny-the-Ill,
    sometimes hasbara
    never comedy.

    https://electronicintifada.net/content/diagnosing-benny-morris-mind-european-settler/4967

    squat/squatter/diseased f–k, not settler.

    5ds

  58. anarchyst says:
    @alex in San Jose AKA Digital Detroit

    Michael Moore’s “schlockumentaries” are anything but honest and are based on half-truths and outright lies.

    In “Roger and Me” he claimed that GM CEO Roger Smith refused to meet with him and dodged every attempt to meet with him. In fact, Roger Smith offered Michael Moore an interview, but was promptly rebuffed. This meeting would have destroyed the whole premise of the movie.

    In “Bowling for Columbine”, Moore’s flawed premise was that the free, unrestricted commerce in lawful firearms was responsible for that deadly event. He brings up one bank’s successful marketing of its services by insisting that firearms were being given out to depositors in an indiscriminate fashion. Once again, Moore failed to note that every firearms transfer was done in a lawful manner, with federally-mandated “background checks” being performed in every case.

    In “Sicko”, his “schlockumentary” on the American health-care system, he used Cuba as a prime example of a good health care system. What he failed to mention was that the average Cuban citizen has little access to high-tech health care, but is relegated to a lower tier of service. The high tech health care services are available only to foreigners and communist party officials–not the average Cuban citizen.

    All of Michael Moore’s “schlockumentaries” are “full of holes”, lies and fabrications and are in the same realm of Al Gore’s pronouncements on “globull warming”.
    Michael Moore (and by inference) Al Gore are not to be trusted.

    • Replies: @PPB
  59. barr says:
    @Lot

    Recent news

    1 Israel Has Killed Nearly 3 Palestinians Per Week This Year
    2 Israeli Settlers Target Christian Palestinians in West Bank Town
    3 ‘Price Tag’ Attacks Reported in Palestinian Villages
    4 Palestinian Teen Killed by Israeli Fire in Gaza Strip
    5 Jerusalem Post Admits It Has No Evidence for Shocking Anti-Semitism Claim
    http://www.antiwar.com 30h Nov 2019

    Number 5 might have something to do with ADL’s reluctance .

  60. PPB says:
    @anarchyst

    That’s one of the problems with any narrative, including videographical narratives, that advance a single point of view. All such narratives will avoid including a counterbalancing perspective, and typically omit specific factual details that weakien the narrative. The intent behind the narrative doesn’t even need to be overtly propagandistic— the more general limitation can be seen as attributable to at least the two following factors:

    (2) The fundamental architecture of human perception and congnition is perspective-based. To know or understand something requires first of all a physical or mental distance between the subject/observer and the object that is to be perceived or understood, and secondly the angle of perspective which that distance generates. At “ground zero”, absent any such distance or perspective, there is neither any knowledge nor perception. The classic example of this is the eye’s inability to see itself, except in a mirror that refects it from without. This in turn implies an endless number of differing perspectives from which an object, event or set of circumstances can potentially be viewed or understood. So while in principle it’s quite possible to generate a single narrative from a variety of differing perspectives …

    (2) Any narrative stream which, like a river flowing into a delta, diverts itself into too many channels, will be less compelling than a narrative that remains focused in a single direction. “More compelling” means “more box office receipts” or “more copies sold”. Furthermore, any narrative that advances a particular polemic will almost inevitably generate attacks from opposing perspectives. That leads to heightened drama! And we all love drama, don’t we?

  61. Anon[138] • Disclaimer says:

    A shout-out and shalom to all of the anti-White Hasbara agents putting in so much time, day in and day out, in at Unz.com.

    Advancing and protecting Jewish self-interest in gentile lands, to gentile detriment, is its own reward. Just kidding. Overtime pay is obviously its own reward.

    @AaronB @Lot @Fran Taubman

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  62. @Anon

    Thanks for the shout out. I consider myself white. But call me what ever you wish.

    • Replies: @Anon
  63. Anon[122] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Thanks for the shout out. I consider myself white. But call me what ever you wish.

    I did. You didn’t notice? My original post was quite clear and concise.

    Re: you consider yourself White. More Hasbara bullshit.

    First: White as a racial category.

    Racially speaking, “White” is a semantic and cultural marker for an individual of the Caucasian race (original race, with no Turkish-Arab admixture) who carries a low (ideally little to no) amount of Neanderthal admixture.

    Ie: relatively unmixed “anatomically modern humans” with minimal hominid admixture on a scale relative to the Armenoid subtype.

    Caucasoids with a high admixture of Neanderthal genetics generally are held to be of the Armenoid subrace (ie: not “White”), which includes:

    Southern Italians and other Europeans genetically compromised by invading Islamist Armenoids that the Jews assisted,

    the Arab subrace, and

    a high percentage of Jews (these Jews who are more or less Arabs with olive to light skin, racially speaking).

    Armenoid individuals who are not outbred to genetically dilute their heritage, which includes a large percentage of Jews, can strongly express a neanderthal phenotype that is clearly a large departure from the unmixed Cro Magnon (anatomically modern human) phenotype that is expressed throughout the peoples of central and northern Europe.

    Jews, as a broad group, have some of the highest percentage of Neanderthal admixture due to the primary Neanderthal hives being located in North Israel near Mount Carmel and then in Armenia near the region that has produced the majority of Russian Jews.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Carmel#Palaeolithic_and_Epipalaeolithic

    Second: “White” as a political category.

    However, if you wish to speak purely politically then let us instead speak only in regard to “White” as a (socio)political category. In other words, as claimed rather than as strictly racial identity. This is where your mistake is the clearest.

    “White”, as a political category, applies to the tens of millions of non-Jewish Caucasoids who identify politically and culturally as “White” and specifically not to Jews who primarily and politically identify as Jewish instead.

    As noted by the fact that Jews will always seek political protection under the banner of Jewish identity (political identity primarily having to do with the facilitation of both protection and prosperity).

    In contrast, the European gentiles largely will seek their sociopolitical protection, when they are forced to aggressively seek it, under the banner of “White”.

    Especially today when they are categorized as such, without much protest, by the (largely Jewish) media.

    And as contrasted with the Jews and other minorities that said media pitches them against as “White” in a competitive battle for political rent and economic resources.

    Which all indicates that gentile political identity is primarily and legitimately rooted in being categorized as White.

    In short, Jews can (and often do) attack political “Whites” as a category and not put themselves in harms way to a degree that remotely approaches the political risk incurred by a non-Jewish Caucasoid as a result of that agitprop. In fact, Jews can remain completely protected under the banner of Jewish identity. Which means that Jews are not sociopolitically White.

    So go fuck yourself.

    The lying wouldn’t be horrific if it weren’t so repetitive. The repetitive, shameless lying removes all inclination toward mercy.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  64. @Anon

    Wow!! I had no idea. You are a regular google source for race.
    I consider myself white and my religion Jewish. I hide behind no one I sponsored two Polish Catholics for green cards. One is a US citizen.
    They consider themselves white also.
    So back atcha with fuck you , you google ignoramus

  65. @alex in San Jose AKA Digital Detroit

    Unz is indeed Jewish; this is well known. He even admitted it in one of his own articles published here a few years ago, called Oddities of the Jewish Religion:

    “… I must emphasize that I cannot directly vouch for Shahak’s claims about Judaism. My own knowledge of that religion is absolutely negligible, mostly being limited to my childhood, when my grandmother occasionally managed to drag me down to services at the local synagogue, where I was seated among a mass of elderly men praying and chanting in some strange language while wearing various ritualistic cloths and religious talismans, an experience that I always found much less enjoyable than my usual Saturday morning cartoons.”

    Just like Israel Shamir and Gilad Atzmon, whom he also publishes, Unz is an ‘ex-Jew’ who is critical of Jewishness. It’s more common than you might imagine …

    • Replies: @PPB
  66. PPB says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    Not everyone feels entirely at home in their native culture. Sometimes this results in the discovery of a deeper affinity with another culture, but it can also lead to independence from all culturally-specific self-identification in the knowledge that while such identification adds nothing substantive to what one already is, it can still serve as a decorative garment for public display.

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
  67. jsigur says:
    @UncommonGround

    But then again, major Jewish lies go unchallenged by Atzmon and why, he wants to assure the tribe doesn’t ex-communicate him. Jews will never go all the way when critiquing Jewish behavior. Perhaps if ever seriously challenged, Atzmon would go all the way but for a Jew, when it looks like Jews are going to win, it would be crazy to cut-off any bridge towards rebuilding their relationship. He wins by being a Jew if Jews get to the point their authority can’t be challenged

  68. Gall says:
    @Lot

    In other words it seems you feel compelled to respond like any good Hasbera Clown by ignoring the argument entirely and use ad hominem against those who don’t believe the sacred Holocaust myth.

  69. @Truth3

    Obvious to me given his missing teeth and braces the sweetheart on the left has a face that is utterly punch-able and has been. Or are these twinks the toothless hillbillies of Israel?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  70. anarchyst says:
    @Jim Christian

    They don’t bathe either.

    It seems that many of them fear water.

    Recently, two jews were kicked off a flight in Detroit because they smelled so bad.

    Apparently they could not smell themselves as they were use to their own “funk”.

    The airline put them up in a hotel overnight where they “cleaned up their act”.

    They claimed “anti-semitism” and “racism” for their situation, not their own lack of cleanliness habits.

  71. @AaronB

    “don’t sneak around in the shadows like some coward.”

    says the anonymous poster.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gilad Atzmon Comments via RSS