The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGilad Atzmon Archive
The Witch Hunt: From Pontius Pilate to the Labour Party
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

A witch hunt is a dangerous game. It entails a merciless campaign directed against people who hold unorthodox or unpopular views. But, as Jewish history tells us, a witch hunt can backfire and turn the pursuer into the hunted.

The Jewish past is littered with witch hunts that boomeranged. In fact, the birth of Christianity contains a classic example of this. Jesus’ persecution began with a hate campaign against a whistle blower who held some radical views, such as ‘love your neighbor’ or ‘turn the other cheek.’ Historically, it was the Sanhedrin war against Jesus that made him into Christ – the message as well as the messenger.

Jesus wasn’t the only casualty of such a campaign. The history of Jewish herem (Hebrew for excommunication), tells us that Spinoza was subjected to the apparatus of a similar highly orchestrated witch hunt. In the Jewish world, Herem is the highest rabbinical censure, such a verdict commands that the person suffer total exclusion from the Jewish community and beyond. As with Christ, it was Spinoza’s humanism and universalism, and not the dictates of the inquisitor rabbis, that planted the seeds of enlightenment and progress. While Spinoza’s Jewish contemporaries didn’t approve of the Dutch Jewish philosopher, the Goyim couldn’t have enough of his Wisdom.

The Hasbara Handbook indicates that Israel is very concerned that it will be subjected to ‘name calling.’ “Through the careful choice of words, the name calling technique links a person or an idea to a negative symbol. Creating negative connotations by name calling is done to try and get the audience to reject a person or idea on the basis of negative association, without allowing a real examination of that person or idea.”(Hasbara Handbook p 22) It is interestingly that the Hasbara Manual complains that Israel’s enemies employ name calling. The truth is the opposite. Name calling is actually a state policy of Israel. It is certainly Israel firsters’ most popular device. Far more concerning to me is that Jewish so called ‘anti’ Zionists use exactly the same tactics. Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Jewish BDS have been smearing those whom they want to cleanse out of ‘their’ solidarity movement. We have seen JVP and Mondoweiss witch hunting, name calling and issuing their Herem against Alison Weir, Ken Okeefe, Greta Berlin, yours truly and many others. What do these vile campaigns have in common? I will let you guess.

Name-calling, witch hunts and herem are designed to stop any lone voice from spreading beyond the walls of the ghetto. At his trial, Jesus was presented by the Sanhedrin as an enemy of the Roman Empire. The Rabbinical body intended Spinoza’s excommunication to impact the church. When Alison Weir is attacked, she is often criticized for her alleged ‘connection’ with white nationalists in an attempt to make the attack resonate with the wider community. I have been slandered as a ‘racist’ although I have never presented a single critical reference to race or biology.

What is fascinating about the herem ritual is both its complete lack of mercy and the role it allocates to the Goy. An examination of how the British Labour Party became an inquisitor provides us with a window into the metaphysics of the witch hunt mechanism.

Since the election of Jeremy Corbyn as the party’s leader, British Labour has been openly operating as a thought policing apparatus. The party has been played as an instrument of the Zionist global witch hunt. It has been purging, evicting, suspending and expelling some of its best and most ethical members. Ken Livingstone, probably the last true socialist in the Kingdom was suspended numerous times for telling the truth about Hitler, Zionism and Palestine. Hundreds if not thousands of other members have been suspended and/or expelled for supporting human rights in Palestine.

The British public has witnessed all of this with dismay. Labour Party members watched their party with disbelief. But none of that matured into any significant protest. This has now changed. Hell broke loose when the Islington Council (Labour) decided to stop me from playing my Saxophone with the Blockheads in one of its venues. Thousands signed a petition expressing disgust with the Labour Council, Hundreds filled complains with the Council. Many others expressed their total dismay with how the Labour Party has managed to fall into every possible trap in this affair.

As is consistent with the Jewish past, the witch hunt has boomeranged. This last slander campaign against me revealed an astonishing continuum between Likud and British Labour. When the story made it to the national press, the Labour Party panicked. Like Pilate, it made the wrong decision which has backfired colossally. Instead of the people judging me, it is the Labour Party that is under scrutiny. Although many of us are sympathetic to Corbyn, the actual workings of the Labour Party have been devastating and perhaps tragic. The Labour Party is running a Stasi like operation, operating as a hateful opponent of elementary freedoms. If the Labour Party in its current form manages to win an election, it may mark the end to Britain as a free country (assuming that it still is). This might sound like a radical prediction but it isn’t original. Orwell saw it coming in 1936 while in Spain. He was slightly wrong about the date (1984). I predicted this fatal transition in my recent book Being in Time.

ORDER IT NOW

By no means do I compare myself to Jesus Christ or Spinoza. Instead, I am trying to point out that what is at play here is the classic ritual of a witch-hunt. This time it is the Likud UK instead of the Sanhedrins that has instigated a non ethical anti humane campaign through a proxy operator that happens to be the Labour Party. In this saga, a Labour Council was happy to play the role of Pilate. The Labour Party has been exploring this treacherous role for at least three years. Yet no one seemed to care when hundreds of Labour members were unfairly punished by their party. People have watched the absurd impunity with which Jewish pressure groups have been terrorizing the British media and political universes. But the public reacted differently in my case. First because the idea that the director of Likud UK, a body that in the eyes of many is associated with crypto fascist ideology, can interfere with British culture and politics is sickening. But there is another reason.

My offering is a message of hope. It counters the path towards destruction that is advocated by pro war Zionist enthusiasts. It transcends beyond the politicized left/right agenda to exist in the realm of the philosophical and the universal. People seem to take my side because they are expressing their fatigue with the institutional duplicitous narrative imposed on them by the media, politics and academia. People are rallying behind me because this battle is theirs as much as it is mine: they fight for my right to express what they think but are afraid to say.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Britain, Israel Lobby, Political Correctness 
Hide 105 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. On reading this I was prompted to see what Ken Livingstone actually said. Watch this short interview and marvel at how two “news” personalities constantly and very rudely interrupt him as they ignore his responses and attempt to reframe his answers. Amazingly, for such an experienced politician, he lacks the skills to control the interview and only at the end does he challenge them on their rudeness and refusal to accept the answers he has just given them.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxQdgRkHj8I

  2. I read this as a satire. If it is not then?

    • Replies: @Gilad Atzmon
  3. Svigor says:

    Jesus’ persecution began with a hate campaign against a whistle blower who held some radical views, such as ‘love your neighbor’ or ‘turn the other cheek.’ Historically, it was the Sanhedrin war against Jesus that made him into Christ – the message as well as the messenger.

    If you’ll allow me to counter-signal a bit here; “turn the other cheek” is actually a moderate message, counter to the radical Hebe alternative. Basically, His message was not to contravene “an eye for an eye,” but to make it clear that lex talionis was not an obligation on the aggrieved party. Christ was saying that it was not a religious duty for observers of the law to seek an eye for an eye; that it was their right, but not their duty. If you understand Hebes, you understand what I’m saying here. (Hebes are precisely the type to convert an aggressive right into an aggressive duty: “G-d DEMANDS that I DEMAND an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth; If I didn’t demand my pound of flesh, I’d be remiss in the sight of G-WD)

    As for “love your neighbor,” well, it really depends on what your definition of “neighbor” is, now dunnit? 😉

    • Agree: apollonian
  4. Wally says:

    “People are rallying around” Atzmon because he is a Jew, they feel safer that way when resisting Labour & Likud UK.

  5. What I do not see mentioned is the antisemitic aspect of the French Yellow Vest movement.
    Dieudonné’s quenelle song seems to be sung regularly, the quenelle gesture is mentioned often
    Still do not know what exactly the quenelle is, French comedian Dieudonné got into trouble with French jews when he, dressed as a rabbi, appeared on stage and made the Hitler salute, shouting Isriheil.

    Since then Dieudonné was prosecuted and sentenced many times for antisemitism, his performances were forbidden many times.
    Nevertheless, he’s very popular with a lot of French.
    The quenelle he invented is seen as an antisemitic gesture, anyone seen making the quenelle is prosecuted.

    If Macron is seen as a jew, do not know, in any case many see him as a Rothschildt puppet.
    Sarkozy is a catholic, neverthless there were antisemitic slogans against him when he was a president.
    Hollande is a jew, though, when he was president I cannot remember antisemitic utterances against him.

    The problems French jews have with old Le Pen are well known.
    He also has been sentenced quite a few times, such as for saying ‘that the German occupation was relatively mild’.
    As French jews were deported of course there cannot have been a mild occupation.

    Germany to me is the country where any criticism of anything jewish is impossible, now maybe a year ago Finkelstein and Ilian Pappe were not allowed to speak in Germany.

    Just a few weeks ago a spokesperson of Dutch jews, Naftaniel, wrote an open letter to the Amsterdam burgomaster, demanding that pro Palestinian demonstrations on the most important square will be forbidden, the Dam, where the liberation monument is.

    Zionists, in my opinion, never anticipated that the occupation and ethnic cleansing of Palestine would become the worst anti propaganda for jews and judaism.
    It may be that jewish control of MSM and politicians hides for them the real feelings of many about Israel, and, consequently, as very few jews criticise Israel, and about jews in general.

    Jews are capable of making terrible mistakes, in my opinion Frankfurter, one of the main architects of WWII, he wrote the LendLease Law, never anticipated that Hitler would execute his 1939 threat against jews, ‘if they again started a world war’.

    Possibly some jews see the mene tekel, Israeli jews seem to buy houses in Italy galore, the last year or so.

    • Replies: @joeshittheragman
    , @Wally
  6. @NoseytheDuke

    In this interview Livingstone comes across as an affable old English gentleman, but in the past he had a long association with the revolutionary Left. In 1981 Labour won the election for the Greater London Council under a leader who was from the moderate faction of the party. On the day after the election, Livingstone organised a putsch which saw the moderate leader deposed, and Livingstone installed as the new leader.

    At that time the British Labour party was fighting an internal war, with the Trotskyites and the radical Left infiltrating the party and attempting to hijack it from within. They succeeded, but it was a hollow victory, the consequence was that the Conservatives held power from 1979 until 1997.

    Livingstone didn’t hide his ambitions, he declared that he intended to overthrow Mrs Thatcher and her government, and to work towards changing Britain’s policy in Northern Ireland.

    It is possible that Livingstone has mellowed with age, but as a young man he was dedicated to overthrowing an elected government and replacing it with a Bolshevik regime.

    • Replies: @Herald
  7. Tom Welsh says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    I quite agree that many decent political figures seem inept at controlling communication. But the enemy habitually employs all the techniques of PR and “bullshit” (in the sense given that word by Harry G Frankfurt in his eponymous book). Perhaps honest people find it distasteful to sink to the enemy’s level in this respect.

    If the plain truth is insufficient, how can it be improved by “gilding”?

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  8. Tyrion 2 says:

    By no means do I compare myself to Jesus Christ or Spinoza.

    Lol.

    And weirdly the above is one of the less over-heated sentences from your article.

    What’s huge, sickening and truly dystopian to you – as the affected individual, is pretty mundane to ordinary people.

    A musician who is widely deemed to have broken politically correct norms as regards a minority was prohibited from performing at a town hall – not surprising. Just imagine if you had burned a Koran!

    To be honest, had you not written books arguing how Jews are the root of all evil etc. you’d probably be banned by Islington Town Hall on account of you being Israeli. That is, unless you were willing to virtue signal against that country.

    Islington is extremist SJW territory. Corbyn has been the local MP for decades and he is practically venerated as a god there. One may not speak at local Labour party meetings as a fair-skinned heterosexual man, unless you’re Corbyn! This tends to go hand in hand with radically anti-Israeli politics, simply because the Israeli side of the conflict is seen as more Western. Israelis are most certainly lower on the SJW totem pole than Palestinians, and this would be the case whatever the circumstances.

    You may wonder why, after welcoming you for years, this time they didn’t? They’re trying to avoid Corbyn looking like the neverneverland virtue-signaling SJW student radical that he is – so if there is an election, the British people might be tricked into voting for someone who clearly despises them.

    You’re a pawn to be sacrificed to protect King Corbyn. That is all. “Look, he isn’t obsessed with BDS SJW politics, he does care about the working class, he doesn’t think they’re all bigots and racists who need to be decolonised, his town hall didn’t have some random (Jewish) anti-Semite play there once, he’s actually a good bloke.”

    • Agree: Lot
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  9. @Leander Starr

    There is of course a twisted l element in Jewish history ,,,

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  10. @NoseytheDuke

    He is a very unique character,,, in fact there is no one like him in British politics… He says what he believes to be true and ethical…

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  11. @Tyrion 2

    I love this kind of comment.
    Just overheated emotions, no argument whatsoever.
    Exactly what one expects if the propaganda balloon is nearly completely deflated.

    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @Anon
  12. @Gilad Atzmon

    Any group embellishes its history, just the Germans do the opposite.
    So in this respect I see nothing unusual in histories of jews and/or judaism written by jews.
    Our famous 80 Years War against Philips II in Spain is mentioned in a history book written by a French as ‘some rebellions in the north’.
    The problem with the history of the jews, of the history of judaism is that judaism is the first monotheistic religion with success.
    Even more important, judaism is the mother of both christianity and Islam, yet these religions destroyed judaism to a large extent.
    Christianity even is seen as having tried to exterminate jews.
    Very difficult to judge what this meant, and means, for the identity of jews.

  13. Jesus’ persecution began with a hate campaign against a whistle blower who held some radical views, such as ‘love your neighbor’ or ‘turn the other cheek.’ Historically, it was the Sanhedrin war against Jesus that made him into Christ – the message as well as the messenger.

    This is peripheral to the writer’s actual point about the Labour Party, but I think it does call for correction. The idea that Jesus was crucified for His moral teachings is widespread, but false. The Jewish authorities had no problem with someone teaching “turn the other cheek, be anxious for nothing,” and so forth. Their problem with Jesus is that He unequivocally claimed to be God, and claimed the authority to forgive sins — and to not forgive sins.

    The Jewish authorities were wrong; Jesus was (and is) God. But, say what you want about them, they at least seem to have understood Jesus’ claims. Many, including the author here, do not.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @dearieme
  14. @Tom Welsh

    Thank you for your reply and for catching on that I really wasn’t commenting on Livingstone’s politics as much as I was attempting to expose the blatant twisting of the truth of his statement that indeed, Zionists did seek to work with Hitler to remove German Jews from Germany. Piers Morgan insisted that what Livingstone said was that Hitler was a Zionist, which is another thing altogether and a falsehood to boot.

    It’s an important point because it shows that Hitler wanted them out of Germany but not necessarily killed, and that would upset the Holocaust industry.

    Livingstone would have fared better had he strongly protested the rude interruptions and rejected Morgan’s version before he attempted to restate what he actually did say, and then all he needed to do was repeat that process for as long as required.

    I don’t think that he came off very well, especially since the host has an advantage in that the viewers are Morgan’s fans. I think there’s a lesson there, especially for a high profile person like the author of this piece who is likely to encounter and be subjected to tactics such as those shown in the video.

    Cheers

  15. onebornfree says: • Website

    Regards, onebornfree

  16. @Gilad Atzmon

    George Galloway comes to mind. I would think that there are more but I don’t follow British politics enough to know. Sadly, I think Britain is lost. British comedy has always been the best as far as I’m concerned and the election of Boris to Parliament is going to be hard to top, but I’m confident that they’ll manage to do it somehow.

  17. @Svigor

    love your neighbor’ or ‘turn the other cheek.’
    ——————————————————
    The above was/is just a bunch of baloney thought up by “St.” Paul to bring down the European races and it is finally working beyond his wildest dreams.

    • Replies: @Miggle
    , @Svigor
    , @Art
  18. anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor

    It’s so cool to learn that Jesus didn’t mean what he said, but that he actually meant what you say.

  19. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reactionary Utopian

    Please do show his words (not others’ words) where Jesus unequivocally claimed to be God. Have fun looking! 🙂

  20. @jilles dykstra

    ‘that the German occupation was relatively mild’.
    ———————————————————-
    The French lost their souls during WW2 by collaboration with the Germans. At least, the SS Charlemane division French soldiers put their lives on the line fighting with Germany against the communists on the eastern front, unlike their countrymen who stayed home in France and licked the bottom of the German boots.

  21. @anonymous

    Do you mean that one of the several authors of the selected scriptures said Jesus said or do you have a link to the video? Just curious. Thanks

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  22. Miggle says:
    @joeshittheragman

    The above was/is just a bunch of baloney thought up by “St.” Paul to bring down the European races and it is finally working beyond his wildest dreams.

    Joesh, why the gratuitous expression of hatred of Christianity? Why the expression of contempt, putting “St.” in quotation marks?

    And why the outright lying, the pretense that Paul had any intention to bring down the European races? That at a time when the whole world spoke Greek?

    Where did you find any mention by him of Europe? Did such a concept as “Europe” even exist at that time?

    Very clearly, what he was doing was visiting synagogues everywhere, he hoped ultimately even as far away as Spain, to convert Jews to Christianity.

    In that world, the number of Jews throughout the Mediterranen region and as far as India was unbelievably huge. The Hebrew Sybil had written of her/its own people in the Maccabean era, “Thou fillest every continent and state”. The first few verses of First Maccabees explains why.

    Your pretense of St. Paul scheming to harm “European races” is vicious.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  23. Svigor says:
    @anonymous

    It’s called doctrine, shitheel, and yes, it comes from men, who have to reconcile a large body of Scripture. Killed any witches lately, stupid?

    (Why are anons always stupid shitheels?)

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Svigor
  24. the Hasbara Manual complains that Israel’s enemies employ name calling. The truth is the opposite. Name calling is actually a state policy of Israel

    Gerard Menuhin, writing on Alison Chabloz’ website:

    ‘Whereas to the overwhelming majority of the world’s population “truth” represents what actually happens or has happened and is therefore vital to all relations and transactions, to a minute, rootless but vociferous minority of professional victims, “truth” is a flexible concept, to be used expediently. As a matter of policy, to gain an approximation of the truth, it’s usually wise to invert everything this minority says. That is to say, when they claim something, particularly when they accuse others of something, that assertion must be assumed to define their own actions and attitudes.’

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Miggle
  25. dearieme says:
    @Reactionary Utopian

    “Jesus … unequivocally claimed to be God”: really? I looked through Mark a year ago and saw no such claim. Did I overlook one?

    It’s more likely that the Chief Priest wanted Jesus executed because his antics in the temple meant that he was a threat to public order in a crowded city.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Svigor
  26. Anonymous[137] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    Greece is a part of the European continent; if you have not yet consulted a map, I can find you one online for free to view. Furthermore, both Rabbi Jesus and Paul were viciously hostile to “Gentile” culture i.e., the non-Jew Europeans, and were accepting only if the “Gentiles” joined their “Jew First” “worship the Jews” cult.

    • Jew Paul: “You must no longer walk as the Gentiles do.” (Ephesians 4:17-19)
    • Rabbi Jesus: “The Gentiles…not so with you.” (Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, Luke 22:25)

    And your pretense of St. Paul recruiting only Jews is false.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  27. Nonny says:
    @joeshittheragman

    Nice, isn’t it, ragman, that we can sit comfortably at home in 2019 and pass judgment on those who had to urgently handle total national disaster half a century ago?

    How many times have you been in that situation? How was your handling of it better than what the French did then? Because they had to.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  28. The “Five Eyes” by virtue of its dominance of the world through victories in the WWII as well as the Cold War have given the rise to the power of the world Jewry and so long as those nations are incapable of examining its own folly in promoting “outsiders’” to the interest of its own Whites-Christian populace, no dramatic changes will come about to check the malignancy infecting not only the domestic issues but its policies that effect the world at large, enormously… it isn’t a fight among the Jews but between them and the rest!

  29. Anonymous[239] • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor

    For where two or three are gathered together unto my name, yea verily, there shall be three or four doctrines! Ever see two Christians agree on doctrine? “But when Peter came to Antioch, I had to oppose him to his face, for what he did was very wrong.” Usually Christians are constantly at each others throats, sometimes as amicably as the 30 Year War. Reconcile that.

  30. Wally says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Good call on Dieudonne, Jilles.

    The popular black free speech activist Dieudonné also rejects the ridiculous & impossible ‘holocaust’ nonsense and has fun doing it.

    Dieudonné Defies Holocaust Religion :

    https://dieudosphere.com

    French comic Dieudonne at Europe rights court over Robert Faurisson: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9904

    Free Speech Activist Dieudonné M’bala M’bala Receives Human Rights Award / Is Then Sentenced To Prison: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9948

    Forbidden to Laugh, By David Merlin : https://codoh.com/library/document/3788/?lang=en

  31. Anon[123] • Disclaimer says:
    @dearieme

    Jesus actually claimed, via his quote from the Psalms, that all we are Gods. My cat agrees strongly, while my dog is still sitting on the fence on this doctrinal issue.

    • Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are Gods? (John 10:34)
    • I have said, Ye are Gods; and all of you are children of the most High. (Psalm 82:6)

    Enjoy your divinity, dearieme! And never let anybody witch hunt your divine nature.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  32. Wally says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    Excellent quote, Johnny. And:

    Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish “holocaust” and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the “survivors”? Because it “dishonors the dead”? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble.”

    – Gerard Menuhin / Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist

    also see:
    ‘quotes from Gerard Menuhin: Revisionist Jew, Son of Famous Violinist’: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10013

    TELL THE TRUTH & SHAME THE DEVIL, By GERARD MENUHIN
    Copyright 2015 by GERARD MENUHIN and THE BARNES REVIEW
    Published by: THE BARNES REVIEW, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003
    available at: https://shop.codoh.com/book/406

  33. @Nonny

    Only once, but it’s coincided with my entire life. I’d like to personalize the experience of being on the inside of a national catastrophe, build some empathy with the French population back in WW II.

    Here’s what it looks like:
    a) At first, you don’t believe how bad it is. Everybody says things are OK, never better, nothing has changed. You might notice that the base population has been forced out of politics, and one of the two major parties has no local representation, but, hey, you’re young. That might just be the way things have always been. WW II is explained by the other side having suddenly “gone insane” (yes, that was the real explanation given). Your side was ruled by saints, their side by devils. In other words, wartime propaganda is still used in peacetime (right after the German conquest of France).
    b) As time passes, you notice that some things aren’t in accordance with the propaganda, and don’t make much sense _unless_ you’re living in a totalitarian society. Rule by judges, for example, in the USA. Statements that overwhelming considerations of state force government to assume control of education and universities. The previous governing class is denounces as “quite a variety of unpleasant names”, and replaced by a new ruling class. (France right up until the Allied bombings kick off reconquest)
    c) The government starts committing obvious war crimes, clearly sacrificing the base population for the interest of government personnel, denouncing the base population and keeping it disorganized by importing foreigners to enforce dominance of a non-representative government. By this point, it’s pretty late in the game. (France after the Allies start re-conquest)
    d) The government tires of the farce and becomes openly totalitarian (analogous to Roman switch from Principate to Dominate, or late WW II in France).
    e) A command economy ensues, resistance arises, and much more serious attempts to suppress the base population begin. Government may change, but only by succession disputes or civil war between Government forces. OR governing class becomes unable to govern, revolts against itself, government transforms (analogy to USSR fall, fall or Rome to barbarians within 70 years of the AD 406 mass crossing of the Rhine (the northern border of the empire) in 406 OR The totalitarian / local government is itself conquered, WW II France).

    No problem with the process enabling psychology: nobody wants to admit how bad things are at first. People sort of know, but comfort each other to maintain a status quo that, after all, provides them with a living and promises a good future (even it it doesn’t deliver one). When you get to (c) and (d), that illusion breaks down. So far, no industrial society has successfully executed (e) for more than 4 generations (~80 years).

    Counterinsurgency

    But until you get to (c), it’s possible for the entire population to pretend that things are good (The pretense is supported by what Ron Unz calls “American Pravda”). The population might, in fact, consider the pretense its precious possession.

    This link is fresh off the _Drudge Report_, and directly attacks the pretense that things are good:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6542633/Brian-Gilden-features-Miami-prostitutes-new-photography-collection.html
    Warning: the pictures are not nice.

    Reference for link:
    Anita Konstantinides.
    “‘They don’t care. They let us die’: Miami prostitutes and drug addicts reveal their harrowing tales from the streets in devastating new photography collection”
    _Daily Mail_, 2019/01/02.
    “Photographer Bruce Gilden captured striking and harrowing portraits of prostitutes for his new collection”

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  34. Che Guava says:

    I am yet to hear or view your saxophony. Would thinking that you playing with the Blockheads would automatically arouse sympathy with many, Ian Dury (R.I.P.) is long gone, and not being brit. nor there, I am sure that many people still
    have good memories of the Blockheads, and that will get you a deserved ‘on the Blockheads with Atzmon’s side’ support.

    They are a little before my time, but I love the few singles I’ve heard.

    Never want to visit the UK of now.

    Sad to not have visited earlier.

    • Replies: @Frankie P
  35. Jesus overthrew the moneychangers. He constantly attacked the Pharisees and other religious elites. He offered faint praise for their proselytizing efforts saying that it left the new converts worse off than they were as pagans.
    The Talmud in Jesus day was a verbal set of laws. It was not written until 200 AD. But it is plain Jesus felt it was too formalistic, too controlling. He advocated equality for the Samaritans, attacked patriarchy, an end to religious hypocrisy.
    Judaism is now Pharisaical Talmudic Rabbinism. It is still too formulaic and hypocritical. The Talmud rails against Christianity, while virtual neutral against Islam. Reform Jews in America continually remind us how much Jews love everyone, while the State they created is as bad or worse than South Africa under apartheid.
    Thank you Ron Unz for allowing this dialogue to continue!

    • Agree: Z-man
    • Replies: @Svigor
  36. Anonymous[199] • Disclaimer says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    I do have a link to the video referenced in John 3:16: “For God so loved the Cosmos,” apparently the 1980 PBS series created and narrated by Carl Sagan. It’s to die for! You’re welcome.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  37. @Counterinsurgency

    build some empathy with the French population back in WW II.

    It all began by Polish provocations, pity was that Hitler did not see the trap.
    GB and France declared war on Germany in Sept 1939.
    Nothing happened, the phony war, until GB and France planned to occupy neutral Norway and Sweden in April 1940.
    Hitler understood the countries did not want peace.
    In a daring operation he first occupied Norway, then beat France in three weeks.
    Just half of France was occupied.
    Still Churchill refused peace, on the day pro war Wilky became candidate for president he stopped peace negotiations.
    Stalin had continued his war preparations, Hitler attacked the USSR three weeks before Stalin’s planned attack.
    That summer FDR provoked through economic boycott Japan to the Pearl Harbour attack, the pretext he needed for war.
    As to the German occupation of France, ‘relatively mild’, as Le Pen said.
    The population you should have empathy for is the German, up to the present day brainwashed by nonsensical guilt feelings.

  38. ANOTHER JEW poisoning the weak mind of whitetrash and and and 99% of them believing….

  39. @joeshittheragman

    Well actually Jean LePen said the same thing. The French farmers thrived under the occupation, which was only a partial occupation. Why was France occupied? For the same reason Belgium, Holland, Denmark, and Norway were. The Germans learned of the Allied plans for invasion. Additionally, Holland and Belgium, while officially neutral, were allowing Allied reconnaissance flyover flights, as well as flights from their soil. They weren’t neutral.
    Germany never had intention to invade France. The enemy for them, was the USSR and the support it gave to German communists, including the brief seizure of power in 1918. They set up the massive, defensive Siegfried Line, gave up its claim to Alsace and Lorraine, and declared their borders with France to be fixed. You don’t build a defensive structure if you are planning to invade.

  40. @Anon

    The earliest fragment of the book of John – p52 – dates from no earlier than 175CE, and more likely 200CE. P52 is a single fragment the size of my palm (9×6cm).

    P66 (the Bodmer Papyri) is the first example that contains a ‘near-complete’ codex of John; it includes 10:34; and it dates to the 4th century (according to Nongbri, whose work is less – ahem – conflicted than the other two 2nd-century dates proffered… neither of which is less than 100 years after the fictional execution of the fictional composite religio-political revolutionary hero)

    And why would you offer Psalm 82:6 as something that was part of the apostate doctrine promulgated by the (fictional composite) Jesus?

    Psalms was (fictionally) written by the (fictional) King David, a long while before the (fictional composite) Jesus was (fictionally) born. That said: The earliest example of Psalms that includes the cited text: dates to about 400CE.

    The line you mention from John, was the (fictional composite) Jesus quoting Psalms, and is very different from him claiming to be Yahweh the Foreskin-Obsessed Sky Maniac (and incompetent revealer of cosmogony to primitive tribesmen: you would think that an omniscient entity would do a better job of informing the tribesmen about how the world came to be).

    inb4 some nincompoop tries to claim that Ye[ho]shuah ben Yusuf wasn’t a fictional character.

    Wait another 20 years: the actual existence of a person fitting the broad biblical description of Jesus, is the last straw to which bible ‘scholars’ still cling.

    They have quietly jettisoned the rest of the story; ditto for all the Old Nonsense (there was no Avram; no captivity in Egypt; no Moses; no Exodus; no Joshua; no David; no Saul; no Solomon… it’s all just a bunch of old made-up rubbish).

    A hundred years ago bible ‘scholars’ would have lined up and sworn that both the Old and New Nonsense was 100% true from soup to nuts (i.e. ,from Genesis to Revelation) – charlatans will do that if they have social power.

    In the same vein: in 1994, 7 cigarette company CEOs famously lined up in Congress, to to declare that they believed that their product isn’t addictive and doesn’t cause cancer. Nowadays, they don’t.

  41. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “Just overheated emotions, no argument whatsoever”.

    In the contrary it was entirely in keeping with the article though it didn’t have such a splendid link as the one to the Hasbara handbook.

  42. Frankie P says:
    @Che Guava

    Che,

    You need to look into what you’ve been missing. Gilad Atzmon is an incredible musician, one willing to explore boundaries in the style of John Coltrane, with honesty, passion and integrity, and perhaps most importantly, a desire to continue in the endless search for truth. I guess that thread runs through his philosophy as well, as is evident in his willingness to call out Jewish power in all its forms, from the rightwing (and labor) oppressors in Israel with their boots on the neck of the Palestinians to the globalist financial and corporate cosmopolitans with their endless funding of bought politicians, and on to the lefty “Jews only” social clubs, posing as do-gooders while they continue their quest for “What’s good for the Jews?”.

    Although these first clips harken back to 2011, and pardon me, Gilad, for not posting more recent videos, these are among my favorites. Gilad Atzmon with the Meetinghouse Jazz Orchestra, arranged by Nicholas Urie, live in NYC. The man wails.

    More recent with the Orient House Ensemble (2013 – 2015)

    • Replies: @Frankie P
  43. We have not had a free country since May 1997 when Blair took power.

  44. Frankie P says:
    @Frankie P

    Sorry, that last one is not with the Orient House Ensemble, it is with Rich Siegel on Piano and Cameron Brown on Bass in New York City.

    Frankie P

  45. anon2199 says:

    Where did you get than Hollande was Jewish? Sarkozy is 1/4 Jewish, although there is nothing that I have seen of him that incorporates his Jewish ancestry.

  46. @joeshittheragman

    The French lost their souls during WW2 by collaboration with the Germans.

    What would have been wrong about “collaborating” with anti-International Commies?

    I’d like to know your opinion on Zionist (from bankers to Kapos) collaboration with Nazis as well.

  47. @jilles dykstra

    Heh. If you had my relatives, you wouldn’t use the term “relative” and “mild” in the same sentence.

    OK, empathy:

    Anybody in the US who reads Goetz Alley’s works on how Hitler really governed vs. how the Allied war propaganda say that he governed doesn’t need empathy because they can simply remember their own life. Hitler governed with an early welfare state, no more, no less. Like _any_ welfare state, it had a budget shortfall, and the shortfall was taken out of the hides of some specific group, just as it is in the US. For the US, the group is the alliance to which the US provides military cover. For example, we protect them, they buy our bonds. Like the Germans under Hitler, we pretend that isn’t happening, that we’re not running our welfare state on the tribute of Empire, just like Hitler except it’s lasted longer. Especially the reformed jewish media establishment, which handled the media end of the Summer of Love and the conversion to a welfare state under the Big Johnson, pretends this isn’t happening. As I say, why should I empathize when I can remember?

    As for the rest of Europe (and the UK) it has been perforce following US policy since WW II. It isn’t an accident that the US and Europe social politics have been in lockstep for that entire interval. It most especially isn’t “common social evolution”. Even in the US the election of Trump and the practice of paying foreigners to vote Democrat shows that “social evolution” had very little to do with the changes here.

    I, personally, spent the Summer of Love on the Lower East Side, and it was just a bunch of kids brought there by the media, no more, no less. No political anything — the “be ins” were just an afternoon at the park, and the kids back then would do pretty much anything to get media coverage.
    Again, the AD 1960s takeover was lifted directly from Hitler’s tactics in building support during the late days of the Weimar Republic, right down to organic food, an ostensibly demonic opposition, free sex (at least as an ideal), hired goon squads (Altamont, Hell’s Angels, and general support for the Black Panthers) and bloody on and on and _on_. Something similar happened in Europe west of the Warsaw Pact, and a pale imitation of it within the Warsaw Pact. The press at the time never mentioned the similarity to Hitler’s program, although it had only been about 40 years since Weimar fell; senior newsmen were in Germany when it happened. Not a peep. And almost nobody mentions it now.
    And you’re correct, the Germans have been beaten up until a plurality think they and their entire society would be better off dead. France too, apparently. I’d think it impossible if I hadn’t seen it in New York City.

    So everybody has been victimized by lies, deception, exploitation, deliberate killing an mistreating of children (by abortion, destruction of monogamous long term marriage), importation of violent criminals, encouragement of violent criminals, and now _everybody_ except the POC and the Jews is told that they will die with few children, and those few kids will have no children. Really, I could have advised a better course of action then that, and I would strongly advise against its continuation.

    But — empathy? What the heck do you think this is, the 1960s all over again? _The 1960s relied on empathy with strangers for their effect!!!_ So did the Republican alliance with the Democrats (very one sided, but still an alliance.)!!! (“Compassionate Conservatism” at one time) So did the election of Obama (“Is the US ready to be ruled by somebody who hates it?” to change an election theme into plain English). So does the current immigration campaign.

    Enough. I used my empathy by the gigamole back then, and it ran out, and I got badly hurt in the process. Never again. I am _not_ as dumb as everybody says. I’ll rely on memory and independent analysis.
    I’ve also met a few too many European immigrants. SOBs, almost all of them, hostile towards any of the native population here and contributing only aggressive destruction. I do _not_ propose sending DoD forces to civilize Europe (or even bomb them) in order to ease my empathetic pain, as the US did for the Middle East, so maybe Europe is just as well off without my empathy.

    If I work very hard, I just might be able to develop empathy for my much battered and badly hurt _self_, then maybe I can take care of some relatives. It will be a struggle, and I don’t want to be bothered while I’m trying, so I want Trump to close the borders and stabilize the country. Let others have empathy for _me_ for a change. Is that too much to ask?

    Summary: If you want to be an empath, feel free. I won’t stop you. I will say, again, empathy can hurt you, “cave canis”, “mind the volcano “, and “there is a road hazard ahead on this route”. But the choice is yours.

    Counterinsurgency

  48. @Anonymous

    Excellent, thanks. You’ve changed the subject though as I was responding to what Jesus was supposed to have said.

  49. @joeshittheragman

    “At least, the SS Charlemane division French soldiers put their lives on the line fighting with Germany against the communists on the eastern front, unlike their countrymen who stayed home in France and licked the bottom of the German boots.”

    I understand the desire to wipe out some Jewish bolsheviks, but would YOU have fought for the republic? Particularly if you were a Christian, or fond of the monarchy?

    Not that the Nazis were friendly to Christians, as they were sidelining Catholicism pretty heavily. However, who would want to fight for a decaying society that had been taken over by left wing malcontents, freemasons, and of course the Jewish merchant class?

    Let’s not forget that it was the moneyed classes in France, particularly the Jews involved in the arms trade, who had cheered France into WW1. Had I been living in France during WW2 I certainly wouldn’t have been picking up a rifle to defend a bunch of Freemasons and Jews. The Quebecois probably had more French patriotism, simply because they were half a world away and not exposed to the rot at the heart of the Republic.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Miggle
  50. Svigor says:
    @dearieme

    It’s not like we have to come up with some big justification for why Hebes would assassinate or unjustly execute someone.

    And yeah, I agree, I don’t recall Christ claiming Godhood either.

  51. @jilles dykstra

    I read an anthropoligical analysis of Judaism decades ago, 1980s. It pointed out that Judaism changed drastically during the Babylonian captivity. Most groups back then would disintegrate once they couldn’t conduct their holy rites, and Judaism, pre-Captivity, conducted its holy rites in one Temple, an that was at Jerusalem. But the Israelites did not disintegrate. They turned inward and survived. The returning Israelites actually became stronger than the Samaritan, the Israelites who had stayed in Judea, and displaced the Samaratins.
    The anthropologist hypothesized that Judaism had changed _so as to protect the Babylonian Israelites from assimilation by militarily stronger groups_. This would have been strengthened by the various Judean wars with the Roman Empire. In any case, by the end of the ancient world, the Jewish Diaspora could survive anywhere in the West. Not the East, however. Unlike Islam, Judaism never spread and persisted from the border of India eastward.

    I’ve been told two roughly similar stories about Christianity. Once (Reformed Jewish origin) is that Christianity is Judaism lite, Judaism for people without time to study, but with a need to avoid assimilation and cohere in a dangerous world. The other, origin medieval studies, is that Christianity was, at base, a protection from Judaism. I must say that the “lite” description fits contemporary Christianity fairly well. As for protection, the contemporary dominant Christian doctrine of “shut up and sit down” doesn’t give much of that.

    The expulsion of Jews from Spain might be considered an attempt to exterminate. However, it was said to be a last ditch effort to prevent Islamic slaving, which reportedly relied on intelligence from Jews residing in Spain. The problem was serious (https://www.newenglishreview.org/Emmet_Scott/The_Islamic_Trade_in_European_Slaves/), and presumably the policy worked. As usual for a contentious area of history, opinions vary and facts are difficult to find.

    As to what this means to the Jews, well, the anthropological view says that Judaism should have enhanced Jewish survival. Since the Jews are here and no other Classical / pre-classical society is here, I’d say that Judaism _did_ enhance Jewish survival. I’d also say that such enhancement is the meaning of Judaism today. Funny thing, though: Judaism is apparently defined (in Reform Judaism) more by belief in the Holocaust than be belief in God. That might break the protective effect of Judaism just as much as the “shut up and sit down” doctrine has for Christianity. That would leave the Israelis and the Orthodox Jewish. Still, compared to what happened during end of Classical civilization, two out of three ain’t bad.

    Counterinsurgency

    Islam is, very simply, the multi-level raiding game that took over the world. It destroyed all its competitors until the Christians found that a mystic belief in the constancy of God gave them science, engineering, and capital accumulation, with which they eventually defeated Islam. (Not at first, however. Constantinople was destroyed by cannons forged in Hungary by Christians. These cannon were ineffective until another group of visiting Christians advised shooting the walls in a triangular pattern. Still, eventually the Islamics were outclassed)

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Alfred
  52. Svigor says:
    @Taxhonestyguy

    He advocated equality for the Samaritans

    Which is a really interesting subject, owing to how horribly misinterpreted The Good Samaritan is today. As in, 180 degrees opposite its real meaning. TL;DR version is that Samaritans were as close to Hebes as it was possible to be without Hebes accepting you as a Hebe. This is the last group to use in a Good Samaritan scenario if you’re pushing Diversity and egalitarianism. If you’re pushing Diversity and egalitarianism, you use a black African or a Mongoloid, both of which were known to Levantines, who lived at the crossroads of the world and the south-western terminus of the Silk Road, one of the most diverse and cosmopolitan places on Earth at the time.

    No, you choose Samaritans if you’re making a racial nationalist argument; sort of like a pan-European racial nationalist arguing that Nords and Meds should share one big tent.

    Christ was trying to tell the Hebes that it was a big, diverse world out there, and keeping the tent too small was a great way to get yourself killed.

  53. @jilles dykstra

    This is a rough and ready field guide only. Use it for issues that are not subtle if you use it at all.

    I read an anthropoligical analysis of Judaism decades ago, 1980s. It pointed out that Judaism changed drastically during the Babylonian captivity. Most groups back then would disintegrate once they couldn’t conduct their holy rites, and Judaism, pre-Captivity, conducted its holy rites in one Temple, an that was at Jerusalem. But the Israelites did not disintegrate. They turned inward and survived. The returning Israelites actually became stronger than the Samaritan, the Israelites who had stayed in Judea, and displaced the Samaratins.
    The anthropologist hypothesized that Judaism had changed _so as to protect the Babylonian Israelites from assimilation by militarily stronger groups_. This would have been strengthened by the various Judean wars with the Roman Empire. In any case, by the end of the ancient world, the Jewish Diaspora could survive anywhere in the West. Not the East, however. Unlike Islam, Judaism never spread and persisted from the border of India eastward.

    I’ve been told two roughly similar stories about Christianity. Once (Reformed Jewish origin) is that Christianity is Judaism lite, Judaism for people without time to study, but with a need to avoid assimilation and cohere in a dangerous world. The other, origin medieval studies, is that Christianity was, at base, a protection from Judaism. I must say that the “lite” description fits contemporary Christianity fairly well. As for protection, the contemporary dominant Christian doctrine of “shut up and sit down” doesn’t give much of that.

    The expulsion of Jews from Spain might be considered an attempt to exterminate. However, it was said to be a last ditch effort to prevent Islamic slaving, which reportedly relied on intelligence from Jews residing in Spain. The problem was serious (https://www.newenglishreview.org/Emmet_Scott/The_Islamic_Trade_in_European_Slaves/), and presumably the policy worked. As usual for a contentious area of history, opinions vary and facts are difficult to find.

    As to what this means to the Jews, well, the anthropological view says that Judaism should have enhanced Jewish survival. Since the Jews are here and no other Classical / pre-classical society is here, I’d say that Judaism _did_ enhance Jewish survival. I’d also say that such enhancement is the meaning of Judaism today. Funny thing, though: Judaism is apparently defined (in Reform Judaism) more by belief in the Holocaust than be belief in God. That might break the protective effect of Judaism just as much as the “shut up and sit down” doctrine has for Christianity. That would leave the Israelis and the Orthodox Jewish. Still, compared to what happened during end of Classical civilization, two out of three ain’t bad.

    Islam is, very simply, the multi-level raiding game that took over the world. It destroyed all its competitors until the Christians found that a mystic belief in the constancy of God gave them science, engineering, and capital accumulation, with which they eventually defeated Islam. (Not at first, however. Constantinople was destroyed by cannons forged in Hungary by Christians. These cannon were ineffective until another group of visiting Christians advised shooting the walls in a triangular pattern. Still, eventually the Islamics were outclassed)

    Counterinsurgency

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Svigor
  54. Svigor says:
    @joeshittheragman

    Militant anti-Christian advocacy is the kikes’ dream for destroying White Nationalism.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  55. Svigor says:
    @jbwilson24

    What’s interesting is that the Nazis attained actual sovereign power, and they were far more respectful toward Christianity than the anti-White-Christian shabbos goy fringe nutsos infiltrating White Ethnonationalism. Can you imagine the nightmare if these wackos, by some cosmic miracle, managed to gain power?

    We’re going to have to exterminate these bugs at some point.

    • Agree: apollonian
  56. Herald says:
    @Vox Australis

    There’s nothing wrong or immoral about a politician saying he wants to overthrow the sitting government or change its policies. Anyway, show us the sources where Livingstone says he would do this other than by the ballot box.

    Livingstone is though, guilty of being a left winger who once aimed to represent the ordinary people that put him into power. However, like like many left wingers he became guilty of getting himself bogged down in supporting the interests of certain over-vociferous fringe minorities.

    He is also very guilty of not standing up for himself when being interviewed by the almost brain dead Piers Morgan and the even yet more stupid Susanna Reid.

  57. Svigor says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    I’ve been told two roughly similar stories about Christianity. Once (Reformed Jewish origin) is that Christianity is Judaism lite, Judaism for people without time to study, but with a need to avoid assimilation and cohere in a dangerous world. The other, origin medieval studies, is that Christianity was, at base, a protection from Judaism. I must say that the “lite” description fits contemporary Christianity fairly well. As for protection, the contemporary dominant Christian doctrine of “shut up and sit down” doesn’t give much of that.

    The (quick) impression I get is that Christianity is a fork of the Hebrew religion (the other fork being Talmudic Jewry). Basically, at one point old time Hebrew religion really was about the Law (something Talmudic Jews have continued to falsely claim right up to the present day), not the Blood, but eventually a Blood Judaism (proto-Talmudic Jewry), i.e., racial nationalism, became ascendant. So the Law Jews had a big Reformation and Christianity was the result. And most of the the Law Jews assimilated into Christian populations, while the rest assimilated into Blood Judaism.

  58. When there aren’t enough witches to burn, the cabal must make more. We are all witches awaiting burning. It’ll be good for the planet

  59. Svigor says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    Funny thing, though: Judaism is apparently defined (in Reform Judaism) more by belief in the Holocaust than be belief in God.

    Well it just goes to show that Talmudic Judaism is racial nationalist Judaism; whatever’s good for the Blood-Jews, the end. Depending on the circumstances, we could see a whole “new” version of Blood-Judaism by the 22nd century.

  60. I am increasingly of the belief that we must begin acting as jews whenever we are attacked. Remember the Gates of Toledo! The Holdomor!

    We are being locked out of our lands just like the Spanish and replaced!

    Screech as they do!

    • Replies: @Svigor
  61. Svigor says:
    @Sic Semper

    Squeaky wheel gets the grease, 100% true. Thing is, we’re the 800 lb gorilla. So we don’t need to be as hyper-vigilant -active -neurotic -etc as the Jews. 1/10th their level of “yeastiness” will yield us the results we need.

    Thank God.

  62. Svigor says:
    @Svigor

    To put a bit finer a point on it, now that I have the time: Christ said “not a jot or a tittle of the old law will pass away.” In other words, he was there to add to the old law, to add a new layer of interpretation, but not to contravene it. This is why Doctrine is a thing; without the synthesis of Doctrine, all you have is idiots interpreting Scripture any way they like.

    The TL;DR version here is that old-school Hebe religion is racial nationalist, or at least, proto-racial-nationalist, and since Christ expressly said that none of the Old Law would be obviated, so too is Christianity racial-nationalist. In short, it’s universal racial nationalism; the Old Covenant was with Hebes, the New Covenant is racial nationalism for all peoples.

  63. Art says:
    @joeshittheragman

    love your neighbor’ or ‘turn the other cheek.’
    ——————————————————
    The above was/is just a bunch of baloney thought up by “St.” Paul to bring down the European races and it is finally working beyond his wildest dreams.

    Good god — the West is going down because it is abandoning Christianity!

    p.s. “Turning the other cheek” is an act of defiance against wrongful political authority.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @anonymous
  64. Happy to oblige you all.

    From John 8:56-59 “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.” The Jews therefore said to Him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?” Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” Therefore they picked up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself, and went out of the temple.

    What’s the significance of “I am?” Check Exodus 3:13-14: Then Moses said to God, “Behold, I am going to the sons of Israel, and I shall say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you.’ Now they may say to me, ‘What is His name?’ What shall I say to them?” And God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM”; and He said, “Thus shall you say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”

    Clearly, the Jews in the first passage had no trouble “getting” this immediately, picking up stones.

    Similarly, from John 10:25-31: Jesus answered them, “I told you, and you do not believe; the works I do in My Father’s name, these bear witness of me. But you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep. My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; and I give eternal life to them, and they shall never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand. My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.” The Jews took up stones again to stone Him.

    Same deal. The Jews weren’t looking to stone Jesus to death because He had advised someone to turn the other cheek. It was because He was claiming to be deity.

    Again, from John’s gospel (14:6-9): Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but through Me. If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him.” Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” Jesus said to him, “Have I been so long with you, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how do you say, ‘Show us the Father’?”

    Finally, dearieme, since you seem particularly interested in Mark’s gospel, have a look at chapter 2, verses 3-7: And they came, bringing to Him a paralytic, carried by four men. And being unable to get to Him because of the crowd, they removed the roof above Him; and when they had dug an opening, they let down the pallet on which the paralytic was lying. And Jesus, seeing their faith, said to the paralytic, “My son, your sins are forgiven.” But there were some of the scribes sitting there and reasoning in their hearts, “Why does this man speak that way? He is blaspheming; who can forgive sins but God alone?”

    So, Jesus is God, or He was a blasphemer. Take your pick.

  65. Miggle says:
    @Anonymous

    Greece is a part of the European continent. Furthermore, both Rabbi Jesus and Paul were viciously hostile to “Gentile” culture i.e., the non-Jew Europeans; if you have not yet consulted a map, I can find you one online for free to view.

    Greece is part of what? What is Greece? Do you mean Ionia? Achaia? Which? Why selective? Where does it say in the Bible that Greece is a part of the European continent? There were three continents. Where were they named? Where was it written, then, that one was called Europe? Indeed, what did “continent” mean, then? Littoral? Should I go for a Meander around and work it out for myself?

    • Jew Paul: “You must no longer walk as the Gentiles do.” (Ephesians 4:17-19)

    You missed the other. The KJV has: “This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind, [18] having the understanding darkened …”

    He is addressing Gentiles. Is he expressing vicious hostility, or any hostility, towards them? Is he even expressing vicious hostility, or any hostility, towards the unconverted Gentiles who have their minds darkened, not yet enlightened?

    Furthermore, both Rabbi Jesus and Paul were viciously hostile to “Gentile” culture i.e., the non-Jew Europeans

    You get more and more unpleasant. Paul wasn’t preaching Judaism, he was preaching Christ, and the teachings of Christ. Yes, the Christ was the Christ, and had a Jewish cultural background, but it stays in the background. And “Gentiles” doesn’t mean “non-Jew Europeans”. Europeanness is not part of it.

    And to reject sacrifices to the gods of the Roman expire, to “render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” is not vicious hostility to Gentile culture, does not even describe a culture, merely a habit or practice within the culture. If that’s what you mean by hostility to Gentile culture you make a serious misrepresentation.

    Yes, please, find me a map drawn 2,000 years ago, available to Paul the traveller, showing the boundaries of the region it calls “Europe”, and of the region it calls “Greece”.

    And your pretense that I said St Paul was recruiting only Jews is false. I didn’t say only.

    Yes, you are right, the proposition that St Paul was recruiting only Jews is false. But so what? To recruit Gentiles doesn’t mean to “bring down” Gentiles, implementing a scheme to bring them down.

    It is clear from Acts and his own writings that Paul was going from synagogue to synagogue. He was a Jew. But he preached the Gospel to all, and often expressly addressed the Gentiles in the synagogue. Many, perhaps most of the synagogue audience were Gentiles. It is clear that there was even then, centuries post-Alexander, an enthusiasm for Judaism among Gentiles. Paul addresses them in the synagogue and after the service finds himself among them, finds that they, not the Jews, are the ones most ardent for Christ.

    Why are you so viciously hostile? What’s this muck from you all about?

    The above was/is just a bunch of baloney thought up by “St.” Paul to bring down the European races and it is finally working beyond his wildest dreams.

    Total nonsense, and vicious nonsense.

    • Agree: apollonian
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Wizard of Oz
  66. Anonymous[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reactionary Utopian

    Thanks for demonstrating that you cannot conjure up a single passage in which the Jewsus character unequivocally claimed to be God, as you desperate Jew-worshipers often claim. The Jew Testament offers nothing but vague allusions, most often from others’ mouths, as I stated above, being familiar orthodox Jew-worshiping doctrine. Popeye the Sailor Man said “I Yam What I Yam” too; worship him as God, at least he’s not a Jewish Rabbi like Jewsus. White men need a middle-eastern Jewish Rabbi for salvation like a fish needs a bicycle.

  67. Anonymous[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    Nonsense? That is exactly how the Jew Testament characterizes your beliefs in 1 Corinthians 1:18-26, namely, “For the message about the cross is nonsense…the nonsense of our preaching…Not many of you were wise by human standards…not many were noble…” It’s common to encounter ignoble halfwits like you kvetching how we who don’t worship your Jewish Rabbi are “vicious,” as if it’s annudah shoah or something. I wouldn’t be surprised if your nose isn’t growing a little hooked, Jew-worshiper.

    • Troll: Miggle
  68. nsa says:

    This comment section is getting to read like a demented chigger belt tent revival meeting…..the only things missing are the laying on of hands and speaking in tongues. Where is the evidence the Magic JewBoy, JC, ever existed at all? Anyone care to rationally explain conception without human spermatozoa…….or a cadaver coming back to life zombie style? Anyone here actually witness such fantastical events? It would make more sense to just worship the kindly Easter Bunny……..

  69. Anonymous[236] • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor

    If you put “The Jew First” (Romans 1:16) and “worship the Jews” (John 4:22), as the Jew Testament says Jew-worshipers must do, you’re not much of a White Nationalist. Also, Rabbi Jewsus demanded that you “hate” and “forsake” your own blood and soil. (Luke 14:26, Matthew 19:27-30) And don’t forget to send shekels to the kikes as the Jew Testament implores because Goyim “owe it to the Jews.” (Romans 15:27) Yeah, it really says that. If you really believe the Jew Testament stating that you “owe it to the Jews,” you’re nothing but a Fake White Nationalist. Because your primary loyalty is to Israel. The Jew Testament even states that a Jew-worshiper like you is a “citizen” with the Kikes. (Philippians 3:20, Ephesians 2:19) You’re a Fake white nationalist, Svigor.

  70. Anonymous[364] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    The West is going down because it was infiltrated by the Jew-worship cult. Every belief that is rotting the West originated in Christianity.

    Note how China has never put “the Jew first” (Romans 1:16) and does not “worship the Jews” (John 4:22) and is heading up in the world, all fine and dandy. If China can get along without a Jewish “salvation” scam, so can the West.

    • Replies: @Art
  71. Anonymous[364] • Disclaimer says:
    @nsa

    The correct term identifying the behavior in which these fanatical Jew-worshipers engage for the last 1500 years is entryism.”

    Rabbi Jewsus is knocking. The Kike wants in your door. Slam it in his Jewface. Beat it, Rabbi!

  72. @jilles dykstra

    You imply that Churchill was at some time in favour of peace negotiations and even sanctioned them. What is your evidence for that. If you can’t answer then your remark about Willkie is just an irrelevant jibe.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  73. @nsa

    It does seem – unless Josephus’s text was forged later, that there was a troublesome preacher from Galilee that stirred up a lot of people before his crucifixion with some well timed populist appeals to the poor in particular. It would be interesting to know if any comparable case can be found where a lot of texts and communities coalesced around much the same message but where the basis for it all didn’t exist. Even the unlikable Moses seems to have had some basis in real humanity.

  74. @Miggle

    He sounds sick. That’s my opinion as an atheist with common sense knowledge of people.

    • Agree: Miggle
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  75. I’m unaware of anyone putting it any better than this…

  76. @Wizard of Oz

    As long as Churchill was not sure that the USA would enter the war completely and openly, FDR began with war in early 1940, the USA navy escorting convoys over the Atlantic, Churchill did not close the door on peace negotiations.
    Once pro war Willkie had become presidential candidate he stopped peace negotiations.

    His effort to kill Rudolf Hess, May 1941, turning off the landing lights, failed, Hess made the first parachute jump in his life.
    What peace proposals Hess brought is secret to the present day.

    Thomas E. Mahl, ‘Desperate deception, British covert operations in the United States 1939-44’, Dulles, Virginia, 1998
    Lynn Picknett, Clive Prince and Stephen Prior, ‘Double standards, The Rudolf Hess cover-up’, London 2002
    In 1943 declaring peace between Germany and GB failed through a never officially explained flying boat accident in Scotland.
    Probably Hess died in this accident.
    The British royals and someone as the Dutch prince Bernard seem to have concluded a deal: both Hitler and Churchill stepping down, Hess replacing Hitler, Churchill in fact deposed.

    Günther W.Gellermann, ‘Geheime Wege zum Frieden mit England…, Ausgewählte Initiativen zur Beëndigung des Krieges 1940/1942’, Bonn 1995
    Fabian v. Schlabrendorff, ‘Offiziere gegen Hitler’, Zürich 1946
    Yet efforts to get peace continued, as the last two books make clear, the German opposition to Hitler kept trying.
    The problem was that this opposition wanted the same foreign policy for Germany that Hitler wanted, therefore Churchill ignored them.
    Thus the late attempt to kill Hitler, August 1944.
    It was now or never for the German opposition to make their position clear.

    Even Hitler continued peace efforts, his personal envoy negotiating in Sweden was the jewish banker Oppenheim, it seems that nobody in Germany except these two men knew about these efforts.
    Stürmer, Teichmann, Treue ‘Striking the Balance Sal. Oppenheim jr. & Cie. A family and a Bank’, London 1994.
    The book written to celebrate the existence of the bank does mention the secret missions to Sweden, but not very clearly.
    I suppose that making it quite clear that cooperation with Hitler in order to prevent the bank being closed is not something jews nowadays like to advertise.
    Gellerman’s book does describe the Oppenheim missions to Sweden in detail.

    • Replies: @Anon
  77. Miggle says:
    @jbwilson24

    Not that the Nazis were friendly to Christians, as they were sidelining Catholicism pretty heavily. However, who would want to fight for a decaying society that had been taken over by left wing malcontents, freemasons, and of course the Jewish merchant class?

    So it was only the Papal hierarchy and not Christians? That’s nice. Proven by the fact that otherwise we would have fairy tales about fairies with names like Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

    • Replies: @Wally
  78. Miggle says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    Johnny, thanks for the pointer to her site.

    Alison Chabloz has become a controversial figure particularly after her Quenelle salute outside Edinburgh Castle during the 2015 Edinburgh Fringe. A talented musician with outspoken views on many subjects including the Holocaust and freedom of speech, she recently received a standing ovation at the Grosvenor Hotel for her performance at The London Forum.

    Another Atzmon, this time female. She’s being prosecuted in an UKky fascist state for “antisemitism”, which I suppose means hatred of Arabs, because they and the Maltese are the only Semites in the world today.

    Or is that another piece of lying, intrinsic dishonesty, like calling a Supreme Court judge a “justice”, when in France s/he would be called a “magistrate”, much more honest?

  79. Art says:
    @Anonymous

    The West is going down because it was infiltrated by the Jew-worship cult.

    Gee – the Jews complain that the Christians have been dumping on them for the last 2,000 years. I don’t believe they are thinking “worship.”

    Jewdom and Christianity are as different as day and night.

    FACT – The West is going down because it is abandoning Christianity.

    (Me thinks you are a little to excited about this subject to be considered rational.)

  80. Che Guava says:

    Thank you. I will be listening to them and watching early next week.

  81. “He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”

    The others are welcome to continue making ugly noises.

  82. dearieme says:
    @Reactionary Utopian

    ” Jesus is God, or He was a blasphemer. Take your pick.”

    Easy: he was, in the eyes of Pharisees and the like, a blasphemer.

    It happens in the religion biz; so was Wycliffe, and Hus; so were Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, and Knox: blasphemers all.

  83. Anon[896] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    A pity you weren’t taught common sense and moderation before being turned into a nerdy bookworm. Setting aside the irrelevance of nearly all of that you are being more race purist than the Fuehrer when you talk of the “Jewish banker Oppenheim”.

    You should read the following to help develop a little nuance in your understanding
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheim_family?wprov=sfla1
    and, especially
    https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/141788/hitler-jews-oppenheim

    And, by the way, in the middle of your nonsense about Hess you show your complete lack of understanding of the position and powers of the British Royal family.

    • Replies: @Wally
  84. Anonymous[120] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Another “common sense athiest,” Joseph Stalin, would agree with your Soviet Psychiatry, and claim a dissident is “sick” to shut him up. Is the diagnosis slow schizophrenia, Comrade?

    Soviet psychiatrists in Psikhushka hospitals diagnosed schizophrenia in political dissenters.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union

    P.S. Miggle’s agreement demonstrates there isn’t much difference between Soviet Psychiatry and his tyrannical Jew-Worship cult.

  85. Anonymous[120] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    You don’t believe they are being worshiped? LOL Have you never noticed the huge amount of foreign aide that goes to the Jews, hmm? This Jew Testament passage accurately summarizes American’s foreign policy:

    “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they OWE IT TO THE JEWS to share with them their material blessings.” Romans 15:27

    • Replies: @Art
  86. @Art

    There is one more thing that these Antichrist minions conveniently ignore. Rev. 13:15-16. How did St. John understand over 2000 years ago that the “mark’ would be needed on the hand or forehead to buy or sell? Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) is the creation of man. It really is the abomination of man and the complete opposite of the true Son of Man, Jesus Christ. The human soul is a gift from the Holy Father the Creator. What has no soul but controls everything today? What human-created entity is being worshiped? It is no accident that the term, “A.I.” is being used in common language. A.I. is Anti Iesus. Why do “those who call themselves Jews but are not” want to control A.I. and the Internet?

  87. Art says:
    @Anonymous

    You don’t believe they are being worshiped? LOL Have you never noticed the huge amount of foreign aide that goes to the Jews, hmm? This Jew Testament passage accurately summarizes American’s foreign policy:

    Sorry – but the reason Israel gets all that money is because of US Jew coercion of America’s political system. The problem starts with the Talmud – not the bible.

  88. @nsa

    Abrahamic religions are a zero yield for the Indo-European. As an engineer, I recognize failure and bad design.

    As third generation American of Greek extraction, I have found meaning, consonance, and the most complete body of wisdom in Buddhism.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  89. anonymous[731] • Disclaimer says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    Christians found that a mystic belief in the constancy of God gave them science, engineering, …

    Lol! Christians also gave the following batshit crazy paganism…

    The Trinity is the teaching that the one God of all existence, consists of three divine persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

    …and capital accumulation…

    You mean with such “Christian Charity”?…

    https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/britain-stole-45-trillion-india-181206124830851.html

    …with which they eventually defeated Islam

    Christians may have defeated Muslims, but they can never ever defeat the True Monotheism of Islam… certainly not with the nonsense above, including whatever deceitful metaphors they cook up to justify it, or for that matter, with anything else.

    Christians cannot keep their own flock, purely because of the nonsense above, and you talk about defeating Islam!! I laugh at your kind!!

  90. anonymous[731] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    the West is going down because it is abandoning Christianity!

    The west is “going down” because of its past and present evildoings. There really are no greater greedy psychopaths than your kind.

    Yes, the west’s dependence on pagan polytheist godlessness is not helping too, but perhaps not so much, as the real comeuppance for that will be on the Day of Reckoning.

    That said, I do understand that the current level of “going down” is not even close to the vicinity of justice served.

    But, I pray and hope.

  91. Skeptikal says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “judaism is the mother of both christianity a”

    No, it is not.
    Despite the apparent chronological relationship, Judaism as it is currently understood, and since the Babylonian captivity, is more the product of Christianity than vice versa.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Miggle
  92. anon[811] • Disclaimer says:
    @Skeptikal

    Babylonian captivity??

  93. Skeptikal says:

    What is your question?

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  94. Skeptikal says:
    @Skeptikal

    Oh, I meant the period of the Babylonian Academies and Bab. Talmud.

  95. @Reactionary Utopian

    Well… As a matter of fact, Wrong, wrong, wrong – and wrong again.

    But if you insist on throwing bible verses around, I’d be happy to hear your view on the one very obvious choice which you – very obviously – did NOT quote:

    When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, He questioned His disciples: “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” Jesus asked. “Who do you say I am?”. Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah! For this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he admonished the disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Christ. – Matthew 15:13-20

    Do a little reading about the PRECISE ancient Jewish understanding of the term “Christ” – also called “Messiah” – and also called “Messenger” in the Old Testament – and get back to us.

  96. Wally says:
    @Miggle

    said:
    ” Proven by the fact that otherwise we would have fairy tales about fairies with names like Dietrich Bonhoeffer”

    You mean THE Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Allied espionage agent? Here’a a gem:

    “Out of pity for complete strangers – a Jewish mother and her child – an SS-man leaps into the gas chamber voluntarily at the last second in order to die with them”[6]

    – E. Bonhoeffer, op. cit. (note 213), pp. 48f.
    see: the so-called ‘Holocaust’ – Theatre of the Absurd : https://codoh.com/library/document/360/?lang=en#ftnref6

    more on Allied spy Dietrich Bonhoeffer here: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=bonhoeffer

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Miggle
  97. Wally says:
    @Anon

    said:
    ” Setting aside the irrelevance of nearly all of that you are being more race purist than the Fuehrer when you talk of the “Jewish banker Oppenheim”. ”

    Yet Jesse Owens, black Olympic athlete, debunked the lies that Hitler snubbed him because of his race.
    Jesse Owens, after winning his events, said:

    “When I passed the Chancellor he arose, waved his hand at me, and I waved back at him. I think the writers showed bad taste in criticizing the man of the hour in Germany.”

    and:

    “Hitler didn’t snub me, it was FDR who snubbed me. The president didn’t even send me a telegram.”

    Hitler and other heads of state were forbidden by Olympic officials from visiting any athletes after their events.
    Hence the lie that Hitler deliberately avoided Owens is debunked.

    Jesse Owens was never invited to the White House nor bestowed any honors by Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) or Harry S. Truman during their terms.
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11344
    and: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11345

  98. Alfred says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    “pre-Captivity, conducted its holy rites in one Temple, an that was at Jerusalem”

    The Jews – and their Arab neighbours – were in Yemen when they were sent to Babylon. They were punished for raiding the camel trains that traveled between Yemen and Petra in today’s Jordan.

    Their first temple was in Yemen. There is absolutely no archaeological evidence that the Jews were in Palestine before being sent to Babylon. After the Persians released them, many went to Palestine and others returned to Yemen.

    Palestine was barren at that time and Yemen was where all the rain fell – that is a geological fact.

  99. anonymoys says:
    @Tyrion 2

    There is just ONE Buddhism. Several schools of Buddhism, yes, but Buddhism is ONE.

    All the schools basically say the same thing.

  100. Miggle says:
    @Skeptikal

    Agree. The Judaism that might be “the mother of Christianity” is that of the pre-Pharisee prophets. The Pharisaic sect of Judaism and its Talmudic (centuries later) era successor are not the mother of Christianity. Matthew 15: (I quote the KJV because it seems to me the more literal translation. In other, later ones political correctness seeps into the wording.)

    1. Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees … saying,
    2. Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
    3. But he answered and said unto them, why do you also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

    And he continues whipping into them for the next several verses, along the way calling them the blind leading the blind, and illuminating the Pharisees with the novel information whatever goes in through the mouth becomes shit.

    That is all the Talmud is, human tradition, written down, then infinitely elaborated. Made mockery of by Israel Shahak for its inbuilt dishonesty.

    That’s all modern Judaism is. Not the mother of Christianity. Rejected by Christ from the get-go. The human tradition of one deceitful sect of Judaism, known today only because it exterminated the rest, all except Christianity.

    • Agree: apollonian
  101. Miggle says:
    @Wally

    You write:

    You mean THE Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Allied espionage agent? Here’a a gem:

    And the name there is E. Bonhoeffer. You continue:

    more on Allied spy Dietrich Bonhoeffer here: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=bonhoeffer

    Thanks for that. I followed your codoh link and found:

    Showing 7 of 7 records matching search criteria

    Revisionism and the Power of Truth, A Comment

    By Jackson, N. , published 2014-02-23

    …Bonhoeffer (1906-1945). This German Lutheran wrote a remarkable essay at the turn of the years 1942-43 entitled “After Ten Years.”[6] The title derives from the ten years of Nazi rule his …

    Whatever happened to Herschel Grynszpan?

    By AnswerMan , published 1998-01-01

    …Bonhoeffer and Admiral Canaris. But nobody knows for sure: and unlike other Holocaust authorities, when the Answer Man doesn’t know for sure he doesn’t fall back on pretending or making things up. For…

    Who I am

    By Mendoza, R. , published 2007-01-01

    …Bonhoeffer hanging in Flossenbürg for standing up to a dictatorial regime. I am Frederick Douglass and Martin Luther King Jr.. I stood up to the Pope at the Diet of Worms and said, “Here I stand.” I a…

    The so-called ‘Holocaust’ – Theatre of the Absurd

    By Hannover , published 2001-01-01

    …Bonhoeffer, op. cit. (note 213), pp. 48f. [7]S. Wiesenthal, Der neue Weg (Vienna), 15/16 & 17/18, 1946; the Soviets wanted to make this one of the charges at the IMT (exhibit USSR-393), but this …

    The opposition in the AA (Auswärtiges Amt = Foreign office)

    By Heink, W. , published 2009-07-16

    …Bonhoeffer in fact prayed for the defeat of Germany (Dulles, p.116). The Opponents waited for the “psychologically correct moment” (Rothfels, p.93) to remove Hitler. Why? Because they were fully aware…

    The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust

    By Köhler, M. , published 1993-01-01

    …Bonhoeffer thus notes correctly that the German press reports in great detail particularly about the spectacular mass trials, even though there was next to no public demand for such information until …

    Bibliography

    By Rudolf, G. , published 2003-08-01

    …Bonhoeffer, Zeugen im Auschwitz-Prozeß, Kiefel, Wuppertal 1965 Horst Boog et al., Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg, vol. 4: Der Angriff auf die Sowjetunion, 2nd ed., Deutsche Verlags-…

    Please point out the one that calls him, Dietrich, “an Allied spy”. Did the Nazis say that? Cover to kill him, as they did?

    What game are you playing?

  102. The Labour Party has a problem with anti-semitism. Jeremy Corbyn could have dealt with it in 15 minutes by condemning it and distancing himself from it; instead he let the problem drag on for more than a year, because unfortunately he has personally sympathized with numerous terrorist organizations, not only Hamas and Hezbollah, but also the Provisional IRA in the era when it was shooting and bombing random people. It is a part of his radical chic. He’d be happy if a lot of us were dead.

    On top of that, Labour performs a cynical electoral calculation. Britain has 250,000 Jews who mostly vote Conservative, and 3 million Muslims who mostly vote Labour.

    • Replies: @apollonian
  103. @James N. Kennett

    Anti-Semitism: Obedience To God

    Well James: if Jews are anti-humanity (ck their Talmud, sucker), isn’t it understandable, fair, and even necessary and healthy if humans are naturally anti-semitic? Aren’t Jews naturally hated by all humanity?–everyone who knows anything about them?–except, of course, for those who are paid-off by Jews. And tell us, Jamesy, weren’t those highly “moral” and liberal Jews the very ones responsible for importation of the muzzies? Gosh, but I thought Jews were supposed to be “smart”?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gilad Atzmon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?