The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGilad Atzmon Archive
Penguin, Rothschild and Zionist Pressure
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Penguin announced this week that in response to claims of ‘antisemitism’ it has stopped printing Col. Pedro Baños’ best selling book, “How They Rule the World.

ORDER IT NOW

The scandal erupted when it was revealed that passages in the original Spanish edition of the book related to the Rothschild dynasty were omitted from the Penguin Random House English translation. The meaning of this deletion is in itself devastating. It suggests that Penguin attempted to kosherize a book by editing and deleting sections so it would not offend Jewish sensitivities.

The publisher initially rejected allegations that the book which claims to reveal “the 22 secret strategies of global power,” is antisemitic. But after continued pressure from various organisations including the Campaign Against Antisemitism, Penguin commissioned an “external review” led by Rabbi Julia Neuberger.

The Jewish Chronicle (JC) ‘reveals’ that Col. Baños’ original Spanish edition makes several references to the Rothschild family, including a passage accusing the banking family of holding “gigantic” economic power and influence which has “led to multiple speculations about their capacity to intervene in key global decisions”. Needless to say, this an historical description of the family and its role in history.

The hypocrisy displayed here by the Jewish media and pressure groups is mind blowing. Jews, themselves, do not hide their pride and admiration for the Rothschild Dynasty and its global political power. In the following video you can watch a Zionist bragging about the Balfour declaration that “changed the course of history” and the power and influence the Rothschild family exercised behind the scenes.

Most English speakers are familiar with the musical, Fiddler on the Roof, but not many Brits or Americans are aware that in Hebrew and in Yiddish the musical’s greatest hit ‘If I were a Rich Man’ is sung “If I were a Rothschild.” In the following video you can listen to ‘If I Were a Rothschild’ (in Yiddish) while viewing the many estates of this influential family.

Penguin initially argued that while the book “clearly expresses robust opinions,” it was not anti-Semitic. However, persistent pressure from Jewish organisations led the publishing giant to commission a Rabbi to review the book. It came as no surprise that Rabbi Neuberger with the aid of two Spanish ‘antisemitism experts,’ reached the conclusion that the Spanish edition contains “echoes of Jewish conspiracy theories.” The phrase ‘Jewish conspiracy theories’ is confusing. It basically applies to events in the past which reflect badly on Jews in the present. It is there to suppress free discussion. Jewish power as I define it, is the power to silence criticism of Jewish power. Penguin Random House shamelessly succumbed to precisely this power last week.

In an attempt to justify his company’s decision, Penguin’s chief executive declared that “Penguin Random House UK publishes for readers of all backgrounds, faiths and nationalities.”

One may wonder what Penguin’s next move will be. Is the compromised publishing house going to remove George Orwell from its catalogue because some Jews insist that deep inside, Orwell was a vile ‘anti-Semite’? Maybe Penguin should provide us with the list of titles that are fit for “all backgrounds, faiths and nationalities.” Out of interest, is Penguin planning to delete Deborah Lipsdat’s books because they may offend ‘Aryan sensitivities?’ Will Penguin delete Salman Rushdie’s titles because he once offended a few Muslims? For some reason, I‘m guessing that T. S. Eliot will be the first to go.

For my part, I welcome Penguin’s shameless decision. It affirms every warning I have produced for the last two decades. The fact that a publisher omitted innocent factual segments from a book simply to appease one Jewish group or another reveals a gross lack of intellectual integrity and commitment to truth. In the Britain of 2019, a leading publishing house doesn’t trust readers to think for themselves. This exposes how radically Britain has changed. It is no longer an open society. Britain is now an authoritarian society. It is, in effect, an occupied zone.

To buy How They Rule the World. on Amazon UK click here.

(Republished from Gilad Atzmon by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Amazon, Censorship, Israel Lobby, Rothschilds, Zionism 
Hide 46 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    THE FIRST JEWISH MITZVAH: TELL ALL THE LIES AND ATTACK THOSE WHO TELL THE TRUTH.

    Thanks for the interesting article, Sir.

    I hope somebody will translate Bano’s book faithfully into English, leave all the Jewish misdeeds in, and post it online, once the copyright expires. These stories need to be told, so more people are aware of the Jewish problem, the #1 problem facing mankind.

    I am glad I am not a Judaist. What a waste of life, seeing these people complaining, whining, all day, lying, and attacking those who seek the truth.

    I was talking to some Indian students at the uni and they said the most important words in their religion is “Satyameva Jayate”—truth shall win. Do not be afraid of the truth. Fight for it, defend it, no matter where it leads you, face it, bear it, accept it, and live with it, for truth is supreme.

    Truth is God. God is truth.

    But in the gutter anti-religion of Judaism, lying and attacking truth tellers seems to be their first mitvah. So all civilized people must leave the anti-religious cult of Judaism. Don’t waste your life in it.

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    , @Anonymous
  2. Is it anti-semitic to write that the portrait of Baron Edmond de Rothschild appears on the old 500 Shekel/Sheqalim note and that the Rothschild family helped to fund the construction of the Israeli Supreme Court ?

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
  3. during the run-in to the 2016 election, Mrs. Clinton was late to a meeting with financier (((Lynn Rothschild))).

    she subsequently sent the Rothschild an e-mail:

    “how can I do penance?” The most important 20th century shabbatz goy was, of course,

    Winston Churchill. A 100% owned property of the Brit Rothshilds, the South African Jew diamond magnates (Oppenheim, de Beers), and the Brit Jew book-publishing industry.

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @jbwilson24
    , @Wade
  4. @9/11 Inside job

    Why those are hate-facts! What are you? Some kind of hateful hater? :-O

  5. @Rational

    “truth shall win. Do not be afraid of the truth. Fight for it, defend it, no matter where it leads you, face it, bear it, accept it, and live with it, for truth is supreme.

    Truth is God. God is truth.”

    I like that. (con brio)

  6. Stogumber says:

    My proposal for Penguin is: Ban Chesterton first.
    The Father Brown stories (like “The Purple Wig”) or “The Man who Knew too Much” or “The Flying Inn” contain such gems of Anti-Jewish critique – flying just under the radar of Jewish lawfaring of its time -, that they will be a continuous warning for Gentiles to distrust Jewish scheming and plotting.

  7. j2 says:

    It is easy to find the truth (or more or less) on any single issue (like the Holocaust, or 911, or JFK), but the truth is that there is the lie. Everywhere (media, academia, politics) there is the lie. You do not see it if you do not look, but when you look carefully it is there, everywhere. The truth is only to notice that the lie really is there and the meaning of it is that there is the liar. The enemy of all other people, the one whose whose goal is control and destruction of all others, really is everything that is said of it and it tries to hide under the lie.

  8. Violetta says:

    Streisand effect strikes again, just bought an unabridged version. Thanks!

  9. nickels says:

    -objects to the lie of overwhelming global power.
    -crushes book internationally to make sure the lie is not propogated.

    • Replies: @sally
  10. Truth3 says:

    Tell the Truth and Destroy (((Their))) Power.

    Tell it again and again. Then tell it again.

    Repetition of the Truth is our only weapon against Satan’s Tribe.

  11. Is the compromised publishing house going to remove George Orwell from its catalogue because some Jews insist that deep inside, Orwell was a vile ‘anti-Semite’?

    Thanks for the link, Gilad. I had no idea Orwell was so based! Now I respect him even more.

    • Replies: @Ray P
  12. sally says:
    @nickels

    It is unconscionable to challenge a bearer of the real truth.. unless of course you are among the guilty??

    Coordination is the main element concealing most truths. When two or more people are party to a fabrication of the truth because they are part of the event or fact for which the lie was fabricated.. it is necessary only to intercede in the coordination between the two liars to find the truth.. Spilt them both down the middle. each into two separate parts, reach in, extract the lie, and the truth will be revealed.

    • Replies: @Truth3
    , @foolisholdman
  13. “…just keep waking ’em up, and don’t let the smalls get you down.”
    – Brett Favre

  14. Ray P says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    Yes, Orwell was an antisemite which is why he wrote pieces like this

    If one judged merely from these war-time phenomena, it would be easy to imagine that antisemitism is a quasi-rational thing, founded on mistaken premises. And naturally the antisemite thinks of himself as a reasonable being. Whenever I have touched on this subject in a newspaper article, I have always had a considerable “come-back”, and invariably some of the letters are from well-balanced, middling people—doctors, for example—with no apparent economic grievance. These people always say (as Hitler says in Mein Kampf) that they started out with no anti-Jewish prejudice but were driven into their present position by mere observation of the facts. Yet one of the marks of antisemitism is an ability to believe stories that could not possibly be true. One could see a good example of this in the strange accident that occurred in London in 1942, when a crowd, frightened by a bomb-burst nearby, fled into the mouth of an Underground station, with the result that something over a hundred people were crushed to death. The very same day it was repeated all over London that “the Jews were responsible”. Clearly, if people will believe this kind of thing, one will not get much further by arguing with them. The only useful approach is to discover why they can swallow absurdities on one particular subject while remaining sane on others.

    Antisemitism in Britain (1945)

    • Replies: @Janus Q
  15. Truth3 says:
    @sally

    Oh BS. Truth is wherever it is, not where two morons think it’s half way between them.

  16. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rational

    Children of the father of lies. No wonder that most of the technological “progress” pushed on the goyim in recent decades is surveillance/control-themed.

  17. Janus Q says: • Website
    @Ray P

    @Ray P Although Ben Judah’s article references Orwell’s anti-Semitism as the icing on the cake for his characteristically Jewish demeaning of one of Britain’s celebrated great men, it is not without merit. It draws attention to Orwell’s pettiness and opportunism, which that quotation on anti-Semitism establishes. He plays up anti-Semitic stereotypes when it’s convenient but criticizes anti-Semitism when it secures him publicity and praise. Orwell is clearly a false idol, a typical British demagogue, comparable with August Strindberg.

    These people always say (as Hitler says in Mein Kampf) that they started out with no anti-Jewish prejudice but were driven into their present position by mere observation of the facts.

    It’s indisputable that Hitler was surrounded by Jewish acquaintances in his youth and was predisposed towards the Jews throughout his life. He bore no grudge against his Jewish doctor Eduard Bloch. He didn’t mind having the Feuchtwangers as his neighbors, despite knowing of Lion as a prominent agitator. He kept Rosa Bernile Nienau close by even after discovering that she was a Jewess. Most importantly, he and Eckart acknowledged Otto Weininger and even incorporated his interpretation of Chamberlain’s philosophy into the 25 points program.

    Rather, Hitler turned towards anti-Semitism after deep contemplation of their opposition to natural laws and matters pertaining to Fate (had Providence decreed that the final victory goes to them?). But it was neither the anti-Semitism of the churches nor of the masses, but of the humanist type (i.e. Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Wagner, Goethe, Chamberlain, Rousseau) who have always maintained reserve towards Jewish friends and Jews they respected, but were wary of Jews overall.

    • Replies: @Ray P
    , @Digital Samizdat
  18. Ray P says:
    @Janus Q

    In Orwell’s essay on British antisemitism he addresses the point of secret anti-Jewish feeling in people who make a show of opposing political antisemitism:

    If, as I suggest, prejudice against Jews has always been pretty widespread in England, there is no reason to think that Hitler has genuinely diminished it. He has merely caused a sharp division between the politically conscious person who realises that this is not a time to throw stones at the Jews, and the unconscious person whose native antisemitism is increased by the nervous strain of the war. One can assume, therefore, that many people who would perish rather than admit to antisemitic feelings are secretly prone to them.

    Earlier, he gave an anecdote as an example:

    … there is widespread awareness of the prevalence of antisemitic feeling, and unwillingness to admit sharing it. Among educated people, antisemitism is held to be an unforgivable sin and in a quite different category from other kinds of racial prejudice. People will go to remarkable lengths to demonstrate that they are not antisemitic. Thus, in 1943 an intercession service on behalf of the Polish Jews was held in a synagogue in St John’s Wood. The local authorities declared themselves anxious to participate in it, and the service was attended by the mayor of the borough in his robes and chain, by representatives of all the churches, and by detachments of RAF, Home Guards, nurses, Boy Scouts and what not. On the surface it was a touching demonstration of solidarity with the suffering Jews. But it was essentially a conscious effort to behave decently by people whose subjective feelings must in many cases have been very different. That quarter of London is partly Jewish, antisemitism is rife there, and, as I well knew, some of the men sitting round me in the synagogue were tinged by it. Indeed, the commander of my own platoon of Home Guards, who had been especially keen beforehand that we should “make a good show” at the intercession service, was an ex-member of Mosley’s Blackshirts. While this division of feeling exists, tolerance of mass violence against Jews, or, what is more important, antisemitic legislation, are not possible in England. It is not at present possible, indeed, that antisemitism should become respectable.

    • Replies: @Tom Verso
    , @Janus Q
  19. Tom Verso says:
    @Ray P

    Compliments to @Ray P and @Janus Q for an outstanding intellectually stimulating ‘give and take’.

    And, as always thanks to Ron Unz for making these discussions possible and public.

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
  20. Jews: That we “control the media” is an anti-Semitic canard!

    Also Jews: An offensive book passage? SHUT IT DOWN! (power grid goes dark)

  21. @sally

    Coordination is the main element concealing most truths. When two or more people are party to a fabrication of the truth because they are part of the event or fact for which the lie was fabricated.. it is necessary only to intercede in the coordination between the two liars to find the truth.. Spilt them both down the middle. each into two separate parts, reach in, extract the lie, and the truth will be revealed.

    Not saying you are wrong, but could you give an example? Please.

  22. @Janus Q

    But it was neither the anti-Semitism of the churches nor of the masses, but of the humanist type (i.e. Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Wagner, Goethe, Chamberlain, Rousseau) who have always maintained reserve towards Jewish friends and Jews they respected, but were wary of Jews overall.

    Well then, I must be an anti-Semite of the humanist type.

    • Replies: @Janus Q
  23. I agree with you on this Gilad, but interesting that the Rothschilds are no longer Jewish and own a very small hedge fund not even a bank.
    A more interesting banking family is the Warburgs, who when the fall came for German Jews became literally the poster of hate. Of course that family went down with the rise of the Riech.
    Interesting that all these banking dynasties with their great power to intervene in world affairs, could not muster enough resources to save the Jews in Europe.
    No book about Jewish power should be censored. It has not stoped the flow of hate.

    • Replies: @jbwilson24
    , @Patricus
  24. Janus Q says: • Website
    @Digital Samizdat

    Well it depends. What’s your view on being virtuous based on the prospect of reward/punishment? Is it ideal to firmly educate children with fear, scolding, beatings? And which authors have you read?

  25. Janus Q says: • Website
    @Ray P

    Interesting assessment from Orwell, mediocre as he is. Thanks for sharing it. This part struck me as significant: “many people who would perish rather than admit to antisemitic feelings are secretly prone to them”. But I would also add that those people also possess a certain degree of Jewishness, which they are likewise unwilling to acknowledge. The instinctive antipathy of the masses for Jews is natural in an undesirable sense. Triumph of the rabble has always diminished the idealistic forms of anti-Semitism. Who speaks of reprisals committed against Jews by the emancipated peoples when everyone is sounding on about the relatively self-contained and principled anti-Semitism of the German leadership?

  26. Blake says:

    Oh I have to get my hands on a copy!

  27. @Haxo Angmark

    “The most important 20th century shabbatz goy was, of course,

    Winston Churchill.”

    No, Churchill’s mother was a Jew. Find her ancestry, look at her photograph. She’s as English as the average carpet salesman in Cairo.

    • Replies: @CBTerry
    , @Hibernian
  28. @Fran Taubman

    “the Rothschilds are no longer Jewish and own a very small hedge fund not even a bank.”

    Nonsense, they own far more than that. You forget they have a law firm, for instance. There are also things called trusts that you might wish to read up on.

  29. Wade says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    she subsequently sent the Rothschild an e-mail:

    “how can I do penance?”

    Was this just a joke? If not, can you provide a reference for it?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  30. Loren says:
    @bjondo

    Cheryl Mills– Clinton aide Cheryl Mills granted partial immunity in …
    [Search domain http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/mills-immunity-228580%5D https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/mills-immunity-228580
    Top Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills received an immunity deal from the Justice Department in the FBI’s investigation into the former secretary of state’s private email server, records shown …

    Cheryl [black gal] emailed Hitlery that—-
    I will sacrifice a chicken to Moloch.

    / moloch is the demon of child sacrifice.
    chicken can be code for child.
    remember the owl statue at B grove? Is the owl moloch?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  31. Gunny T says:

    From Unfiltered Minds of Independent Thinkers of the 3rd Grade Dropout Section:

    The Solutions To Our Problems Are An Inside Job.And Unless You Research For the Truth, you won’t find it!

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  32. Anonymous[111] • Disclaimer says:
    @Loren

    I will sacrifice a chicken to Moloch.

    I remember that one.

    It’s not something many people would say to their employer – unless they knew the boss was familiar with Moloch and comfortable with those kinds of jokes.

    Hillary was officially a Catholic, right?

    • Replies: @anon
  33. @j2

    Yes, the amazing thing is how much the stereotype of “The Jews” is really true. For so many years I rejected that possibility on the grounds that nothing that “crazy” could be true. Then I started actually looking into it. Now I believe in the stereotype of “The Jews” But if I had met me as I am now 5 years ago, I would have dismissed me as a nut case

  34. Hibernian says:
    @jbwilson24

    I bet dollars to donuts you’re just passing along what you’ve heard and/or you believe a Jennie Jerome from NYC must be Jewish. Sure, many upper class Christian people are part Jewish, usually a very small part.

  35. @j2

    Do you think the Holocaust did not happen?
    That the Jews did 9/11 and killed JFK.
    Is it there and everywhere?
    Just curious so I know where you stand and how mentally competent you are.
    Better to disengage completely if it is true.
    I mistook you for an honest intellectual writing about events that you had studied.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @NoseytheDuke
  36. Patricus says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Hello Fran Taubman,
    I read a book about the Rothschilds and they had an incredible run of success in the 18th and 19th centuries. By the early 20th century their fortunes were diluted by marriages. At one time a Rothschild brother and sister married in an attempt to consolidate fortunes. Despite this effort they couldn’t stop the dilution of financial fortunes, and they are no different than many gentile fortunes. There are current wealthy Rothschild descendants but, aside from one, these are relatively modest fortunes. They aren’t controlling the world.

  37. Vinnie O says:

    OK, I’m easily confused. If the available version of “How They Rule the World” in English is KNOWN to have been censored, why would ANYONE want to own a copy? I don’t read Spanish, so I guess I’ll never read an uncensored version.

  38. anonymous[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Do you think the Holocaust did not happen?

    Do you actually think the holocaust DID happen?

    • Replies: @bjondo
  39. bjondo says:
    @anonymous

    Do you actually think the holocaust DID happen?

    With so many survivors, who died? paraphrasing Norman Finkelstein’s mother.

    Wonder if NF actually gives that some thought?

  40. @Gunny T

    Am I to understand from your comment that you are saying that there is no link between the Rothschild dynasty, Zionism and America’s problems? Perhaps providing a link or two would make your comment less opaque.

  41. @Fran Taubman

    If you really want information on those matters you can find thousands of words answering your questions in considerable detail in several different articles right here on this website, but I suspect that your “curiosity” has brought you here to cast aspersions against those who genuinely do seek truthful answers.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  42. @NoseytheDuke

    Don’t know why you are saying that if you are following the threads. I have had a long back and forth with J2 on Ron’s link.
    His demeanor is that of an intellectual not an all out racist like some people on this site. But When I saw his comments on this thread about JFK and 9/11, I realize I had misjudged him, and that he was pretty far down the conspiratorial rabbit hole.

    This is my breakdown of people on this site:
    1. There are the racist which I do not engage. No point, they are too far gone.
    2. There are the conspiratorial folks which I also do not engage. No point they are too far gone.
    3. Then there are the people who are Muslims or anti Zionist but normal people that I can engage with and the exchanges are gratifying like Talhia.

    So perhaps this answers you curiosity on why I am here, which is odd to me. My conversations on the other threads were with Radical Traditional Catholics, a racist hate group, who were all out attacking me personality, truly cowards, thus my dispersive comments. I am not here to cast dispersions on anyone. This is public site, and when ever I see something falsely written about the Jews I will refute it. Like ritual child murders and the use of blood. It is false.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gilad Atzmon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?