The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewFred Reed Archive
Whither Israel?
The Road to Ruad
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I first heard the phrase in Phnom Penh during the siege: “The situation is hopeless, but not critical.” As Israel and the Moslem world claw at each other unendingly, I wonder whether the same diagnosis doesn’t apply. Perhaps I am wrong. I don’t see how.

To begin at the beginning: The Jews had long wanted a country of their own and, after Germany, understandably really wanted one. The problem was that all the countries were already taken except maybe Antarctica, so they conquered parts of Palestine by force of arms.

There was nothing Jewish about this. Most of history consists of groups conquering each other’s territory. When you do this, the conquered people hate you, and begin to resist. To control them you resort to the rifle butt, the torture chamber, the air strike, and the secret police. This makes them hate you more, world without end. Consider the occupation of Jewish Palestine by the Romans, the Jewish resistance, and Rome’s murderous responses.

The neighboring Moslem peoples, and indeed all Moslems, came to hate the modern Jews like poison, and the Jews, now become Israelis, soon returned the sentiment. Historically, this was business as usual. Christians, Jews, and Moslems have spent a phenomenal amount of time hating each other. It doesn’t seem to have gained them much.

Anyway, a vaguely possible modus vivendi was the Two-State solution, now dead, if it ever wasn’t, because Israel is absorbing the occupied territories. So many Jewish settlers now live on occupied Moslem land that no Israeli government could force them to come back, even if it wanted to, which it emphatically doesn’t. So much for modus vivendi.

In what amounts to Greater Israel, the Jews came to have custody in Israel proper of about 1.7 million Moslems, in Gaza of over a million and a half who hate Israel and, in the West Bank, pushing toward three million more, who hate Israel. Why Israel wants additional Moslems isn’t clear—I don’t want any at all, as they seem to be nothing but trouble–but it does seem to be collecting them.

This means that Israel can never be a democracy because, if the Moslems had the vote, Israel would stop being a Jewish state and just be a country with a lot of Jews. Worse, the moment Moslem voters, who breed faster than Jews, outnumbered these by one vote (if they ever did), Israel would become an Islamic republic, like Afghanistan. I do not think the Israelis have this in mind.

How a First World people can live as keepers of what appear to irremediably primitive Third Worlders is not clear, even without hatred.

There is worse. The Moslems cannot be allowed much commercial success, since it would translate into political power. And intermarriage must be prevented at all costs, since Jews, of whom there are not many to begin with, could be bred out of existence. Is this not Alabama in 1900?

So what can Israel do with its internal Moslems? Logically it can (a) shoot them all, which even Netanyahu probably wouldn’t do, or (b) exist forever with a huge and perhaps growing number of hate-filled subjects, or (c) push them across the borders at bayonet-point. Is there another choice?

Since the Moslems both internal and external hate the Jews, Israel must constantly fight them off, often militarily. Just now it is invading Gaza again, which has been firing rockets into Israel. The Moslems are always doing something, such as blowing up buses full of Israelis, so Israel is always bombing Gaza, invading Gaza, killing Turks, bombing Lebanon, invading it, bombing Iraq, killing Iranian scientists, and so on. There is the usual political posturing and kindergarten yelling about you started it, no,you started it, but underlying the noise is that the two sides bitterly hate each other.

If there is any reason to believe that it will ever stop, I am unaware of it. Does anyone seriously foresee a multi-culti, Koom Bah Yah amity, with turbans and yarmulkes back-yard barbecuing together and swapping dirty stories? Anybody who thinks this possible must be smoking Drano. The two flavors of Moslem are murdering each other in droves, and they have the same faith. They’re going to learn to love Jews?

Any day now.

No military solution is possible. Israel’s First World, heavily armed, high-tech forces can defeat, usually easily, any forces arrayed against it by its Third-World enemies. It just can’t keep them defeated. Nor can the Moslems decisively defeat Israel. The only remotely plausible approach would be to force Israel to mobilize and stay mobilized until its economy collapsed, which for a lot of reasons isn’t going to happen, and anyway the US would intervene.

The beat goes on.

Meanwhile, Israel depends utterly on America for its survival. Yes, it is an advanced, highly educated, commercially astute nation, and if it lived in peace would be a small roaring success. But it doesn’t live in peace. And it is too small to buy or build the forces it needs to repel its neighbors and keep its supply lines open. It cannot field a large army other than briefly because it just doesn’t have the population. A garrison state, it very much needs US support.

Said support is not just military and economic. If votes in the UN are an indication, Israel is detested by most of the planet, which would endeavor to do all manner of anti-Israeli things if the US didn’t veto all of them. Israel has a PR problem. In Gaza we see the now-common spectacle of a national military fighting a non-state enemy of barely armed militants. The result is dead children, recorded on cell-phone cameras. Image-wise, not good.

In America politics regarding Israel are often bitter and even more confusing. For example, I know feminists hostile to Israel, which doesn’t mistreat women at all, yet well disposed to Moslems, for whom mere misogyny would be a great step upward. Many Jews of my acquaintance are ambivalent or confused, wanting Israel to survive yet loathing its government.

How firm is American support for Israel? Very—for now, anyway. This is due in part to the immensely powerful Israel lobby in Washington, in part to a certain lack of enthusiasm for Moslems after 9/11, and in part to the lack of strong anti-Jewish sentiment in America. The United States isn’t Poland. In fact there is a lot of pro-Jewish feeling, seldom mentioned because it doesn’t fit the journalistic template of the eternally endangered Jew on the raw edge of extermination, sieg heil. Of course, pro-Jewish and pro-Israel are different categories.

If there is ever a threat to American support, it will be not from anti-Semitism but from indifference. There is a potential softness in the support. When Netanyahu gets 29 (was it?) standing ovations in Congress (which he did) it is not because all Congressmen are wildly enthusiastic about Israel. God himself would not receive such unanimous enthusiasm. Electoral politics screens out principle, and politicians will vote for whatever they think in their interest. If congressmen spoke honestly (yes, I know) I think you would find a small neo-Nazi group virulently against Israel, a substantial Christian group strongly for—and a majority who just wanted the question to go away.

There are powerful forces—Big Oil, companies that want to do business in Iran—that would happily abandon a small, petro-dry nation with no resources. Thus the crucial importance of the lobby.

All in all, it seems to me that Israel has gotten itself into a horrible situation, hated within, hated without, and hanging by a lobby. What can the Israelis do? Emigrate to New York? Undertake an absolutely horrific ethnic cleansing? Exercise the Antarctica Option? Spend all eternity ducking rockets and bombing neighbors? Live as herdsmen of unwanted Moslems that they have to avoid assimilating?

I don’t see a happy ending. Or any ending.

(Republished from Fred on Everything by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Israel, Israel Lobby 
Hide 26 CommentsLeave a Comment
26 Comments to "Whither Israel?"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. wah wah says:

    Gimme a break; it isn’t only neo-nazis who hate Israel – Israel is itself neo-nazi.

  2. KA says:

    Did yes Israel ever contemplate any solution other than one that cherishes most? Anytime in history of last 90 yrs from the day Arab reluctantly agreed for one state that would have included all the inhabitants but no further mass scale colonial power protected and promoted Jewish immigration on cargo containers?
    Don’t think so. Did the Jews even allow the UN assembly consider the last minute but before the Assembly convened the 6 point program
    that asked for 1 Federal independent state
    2 consisting of government of Arab and Jewish component. 3 boundaries of the cantons to be fixed on a federal basis .4 constitution will be selected by constituent assembly who will be elected by universal suffrage . Proportionality of the population will be taken into account and honored towards selecting the constituent assembly
    5 The constituent assembly will draw its inspiration chiefly from the US constitution
    6 freedom of the religion ,protection of the holy places,liberty of access to religious sites,safeguarding the rights of the rights of religious establishments of all nationalities in Palestine
    The New York Times by Thomas J Hamilton- Assembly votes Palestine Partition . Arabs fail in last minute resort to Federal plan.

    Even after 1949′ Arabs wanted a solution, Syria even offered to take hundreds of thousands refugees for access to water,
    Arafat in 1970 was ready for a solution. Saudi Arab from 1982 to 2007 has offered two state solutions with the same demands that the world has asked for.

    Israel does not have to start a war in Gaza. It simply can stop the blockade and monitor any terror activity from inside its own borders.

  3. Michael says:

    For example, I know feminists hostile to Israel, which doesn’t mistreat women at all, yet well disposed to Moslems, for whom mere misogyny would be a great step upward.

    This is not the case. Ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel treat women very poorly, in ways quite similar to fundamentalist Muslims actually-trying to segregate buses by gender, banning them from praying at holy sites, having their wives stay barefoot and pregnant, etc. It’s true they are a minority, but a powerful one. Worse, most Ultra-Orthodox live on assistance while exempted from the otherwise mandatory service in the Israeli military, while often voting for policies which require fellow Israelis to fight on their behalf. Again similar to Muslims, they have much higher birthrates than moderate and secular Jews in Israel. Not to mention they form the foundation of the right-wing settler movement whose aim to reclaim all of the West Bank perpetuates the conflict. It’s a huge problem in Israeli politics, with the Ultra-Orthodox minority parties have disproportionate influence due to larger parties requiring their support to form governments in the parliament.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  4. KA says:

    Picking apart the New York Times Zionist narrative on the Nakba . . . using the New York Times
    May 17, 2011 http://www.mondoweiss.net

    http://mondoweiss.net/2011/05/picking-apart-the-new-york-timess-zionist-narrative-on-the-nakba-using-the-new-york-times.html

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/07/murray-n-rothbard/war-guilt-in-the-middle-east/ -War Guilt in Middle East by M Rothbard

    http://mondoweiss.net/2013/12/israels-dangerous-shavits.html by Jeremy Slater

    These authors show that the Zionist repeatedly failed to to show honesty,far sighted ness belief in justice,faith in human being , seize opportunities for long term safety of the Jews ,honor ,growth of Palestine communities , belief in separating the nation from the religion , fail to define Israeli fail to correct the repeated injustices to locals,and for never considering a true two state or one federated state as solution.
    Deception,distortion,and dogma have defined its doctrinaire behaviors . It has always allowed itself to succumb to the most intransigent,most rabid,most fanatic ,most uncompromising section of the Zionism .

  5. SFG says:

    Pretty much what I believe. A few nitpicks:

    -There are a few Jewish congressmen with personal sympathies, and a few congressmen from areas with large Jewish populations who might feel obligated to their constituents. But in much of the country it is as you cliam.

    -Sikhs wear turbans, not Muslims.

  6. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “This means that Israel can never be a democracy because, if the Moslems had the vote, Israel would stop being a Jewish state and just be a country with a lot of Jews. Worse, the moment Moslem voters, who breed faster than Jews, outnumbered these by one vote (if they ever did), Israel would become an Islamic republic, like Afghanistan. I do not think the Israelis have this in mind.”

    This isn’t true. The Jewish birth rate in Israel is increasing, and the Muslim birth rate not just around and in Israel proper but in the entire Levant is declining. This combined with the emigration of Muslims and the immigration of Jews means that Arabs and Palestine itself will wither away, and the Jews, because of their demographic might, will be the last men standing.

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/177456/settlers-one-state-solution?all=1

    This article is pretty interesting because it contradicted everything i assumed about demographics in the middle east. Worth a read.

    • Replies: @KA
    , @Jim
  7. J says: • Website

    It is true that “Israel has gotten itself into a horrible situation” and no happy ending is in sight. Israel is a learning society, and by fighting us incessantly, we learn to fight. We have learnt a few impossible things, like to reverse the demographic challenge, that we are winning. The more we are attacked and the more insecure we feel, the more powerful Israel is forced to be. We have now one of the best fighting forces with the best weapons. We are not hanging by a lobby, I see the Palestinians hanging by our desire to be aligned with “human rights”.

    • Replies: @KA
  8. kj says:

    Re: “The United States isn’t Poland…” Fred, ask yourself why
    Poland before WW II had Europe’s largest Jewish population, 3.5 million – 10% of the population. The simple answer is that the Jews were either expelled from practically every major country in Western Europe (from Spain in 1492, from Britain not once but twice, …) or repeatedly butchered (for example, in Germany throughout the Middle Ages). It was only in the Polish Empire (technically, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth or Republic) which was Europe’s first democracy (had habeas corpus 200 years before Britain!) that the Jewish population effectively formed a state within the state and thrived for centuries.

    • Replies: @KA
    , @KA
  9. KA says:
    @Anonymous

    The increase in Jewish birth rate should be given a proper name . The new rapidly breeding demographic bomb.
    Oops! It sounds a little unsophisticated.
    What about this- after relentless wars lasting decades moments from it’s establishment in reality, Israel is now heaving a sigh of relief . Israel is at peace,tired,and happy longing for family time . Israeli family value is part of the fabric of Judaism . They love and adore kids. Now they are going to have more and more and more of them. Actually the trend started well before the end of the hostilities ,way before the Palestinian dropped out of the race.

  10. KA says:

    Author says Israel has a PR problem. I guess Hitler still has the same problem . One can’t even question the type and magnitude of his criminality in some parts of Europe . He or she including the feminist will end up in jail.
    Again same in Israel. Mentioning Naqaba in Israel can get one in the jail or removed from the state .

  11. KA says:
    @J

    You have got one implication right. Seeing themselves as better,as being chosen to spread the light among the unchosen,and being always under attack from outsider who are ethically,morally,and spiritually degenerate compared to the the Jews it has maintained culturally,genetically,and religiously a closed ethnic tribal group with no permeability to the outside world . It has carried the same mindset from ancient times of separation from the rest around it self,no mixing,no intermarriage,no foreign ideas ,no social contact and above all when in Israel or Zion ,no residency permit for the non skews even for the converted while taking financial,business,and other potentially exploitative contacts with the outside world through the elite or the kings of the non Jews . The group solidarity but denying the same to other and having one set of rules for themselves and another for the outside ,it has generated hostilities throughout the centuries .
    Hostility unites Jews more than anything . Generating hostility also keeps it apart and reinforces the tendency to cling together giving rise to more ethnocentric,exclusive philosophy .

    It used to be the case that Jews were unique and Chosen people of God for God decided so. Now it is unique for it has suffered throughout the ages . Now it is unique for it has never given up the hope for return to Israel. It is unique that despite the world rejecting them or trying to kill them Jews never stopped uplifting the moral compass of the world. Only Judaism ,so u owe ,can blend religion and democracy and have a Jewish democratic state. After all Judaism is the fountain of the democratic ideas.

    Kevin Macdonald summarizes the ethnocentric,exploitative ,and anti gentile nature of Judaism best in his various writings and blogs.

  12. KA says:
    @kj

    Jews should ask themselves why they were repeatedly expelled from different countries in different times from Egypt to from Germany . It is the rabbinical and Talmudic Jewish perspective to blame the Gentiles. But Gentiles have their own perspective and that is not based on abstract term like illogical belief ,insane hatred,moral incompetence,lack of a soul or chosen by God same way.
    It is based on plain analysis of economic events ,political behaviors of the Jews and analysis of the traditions of maintaining covert existence and carrying out covert destructive behaviors by the Jews among Egyptians ,Persian,English,Spanish,and German societies.
    America has proven to be no exception.

  13. KA says:
    @kj

    Russian experience could be summarized in this link
    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Solzhenitsyn-200-Years-Together-18.html

    Second the longest Republic was Venice It was established by fleeing Romans after the barbarians overwhelmed Rome . It continued to exist without noble,without king,without landed gentry for almost 1200 yrs.

    Third Jews enjoyed a remarkable powerful rich positions in Poland right until before Hitler occupied it.- 56 percent in medicine,( doctors in practice),Lawyers legal advisors 33ercent,teachers,educators 43 percent,druggist,laboratory workers 24 percent,journalists ,publishers 22 percent
    Out of 3 million population,300,000 were professionals and intellectuals ,petty bourgeoise 2 million,and 700,000 working class.

  14. Jim says:
    @Anonymous

    Much of the Jewish increase is Mizrahim whose average IQ isn’t very high (I think about 87). In any case Israel will still be an island in a hostile Arab Sea.

  15. Sean says:

    The Palestinians turned down a serious offer for a final settlement, which could only be because they thought time was on their side. It wasn’t. The Palestinians would bite Israel’s hand off if the Camp David 2000 Summit offer was made again; does Fred not realise who is winning?

    • Replies: @KA
  16. KA says:
    @Sean

    No they did not.It was a proposal by Tony Blair under the letter head of Sisi

    This is form Mondoweiss.net–

    “The Israeli government, followed suit by Western media and governments, was quick to put the blame on Hamas for that. Hamas – they claim – had an opportunity to accept a truce brokered by Egypt – and refused it. Others have already explained at length why this proposal crafted without any consultations with Hamas, was hard to accept by Hamas.

    Much less noticed by the Western media was that Hamas and Islamic Jihad had meanwhile proposed a 10 year truce on the basis of 10 – very reasonable – conditions. While Israel was too busy preparing for the ground invasion, why didn’t anyone in the diplomatic community spend a word about this proposal? The question is all the more poignant as this proposal was in essence in line with what many international experts as well as the United Nations have asked for years now, and included some aspects that Israel had already considered as feasible requests in the past.

    The main demands of this proposal revolve around lifting the Israeli siege in Gaza through the opening of its borders with Israel to commerce and people, the establishment of an international seaport and airport under U.N. supervision, the expansion of the permitted fishing zone in the Gaza sea to 10 kilometers, and the revitalization of Gaza industrial zone. None of these demands is new. The United Nations among others have repeatedly demanded the lifting of the siege, which is illegal under international law, as a necessary condition to end the dire humanitarian situation in the Strip. The facilitation of movement of goods and people between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip had already been stipulated in the Agreement on Movement and Access (AMA) signed between the Government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority in 2005. Even the construction of a port and the possibility of an airport in Gaza had already been stipulated in the AMA, though the actual implementation never followed. The requested increase of the permitted fishing zone is less than what envisaged in the 1994 Oslo Agreements and it was already part of the 2012 ceasefire understanding. Unhindered fishermen’s access to the sea, without fear of being shot or arrested and having boats and nets confiscated by Israeli patrols is essential to the 3000 Gaza fishermen struggling to survive today by fishing in a limited area which is overfished and heavily polluted. The revitalization of the Gaza industrial zone, which has progressively been dismantled since the 2005 disengagement and by continuous military operations, was already considered a crucial Palestinian interest at the time of the 2005 Disengagement.

    The proposed truce also demands the withdrawal of Israeli tanks from the Gaza border and the Internationalization of the Rafah Crossing and its placement under international supervision. The presence of international forces on the borders and the withdrawal of the Israeli army requested by Hamas is unsurprising, considered the heavy toll of casualties by Israeli fire in the Access Restricted Areas near the Israeli border (i.e. an area of 1.5km along the border comprising 35% of Gaza land and 85% of its whole arable land). The international presence should guarantee that Egyptian and Israeli security concerns are equally met.

    The proposal also requests Israel to release the Palestinian prisoners whom had been freed as part of the deal to liberate Gilat Shalit and were arrested after the killing of the three Israeli youths in June 2014 in the West Bank; that Israel refrains from interfering in the reconciliation agreement between Hamas and Fatah; and that the permits for worshippers to pray at the Al Aqsa Mosque be eased.” http://mondoweiss.net/2014/07/deafening-silence-proposal.html

    From-Francesca Albanese is an international lawyer based in Washington DC. After working eight years for the United Nations including in the Middle East and in Jerusalem, the heart of the conflict over Palestine

  17. @Michael

    …having their wives stay barefoot and pregnant, etc.

    Hey, better barefoot and pregnant than conscribed into military fatigues. The Haredi ladies are exempt, G!d bless ’em. (And so are Arab men— is that a slap in the face, or what?)

    Will practicing Baptists and Catholics be exempt when draft registration comes to American women? And it’s coming– read Goldberg v. Rostker, followed by Obama’s going-away gift to Leon Panetta last year.

    For fun, compare Debbie Schluessel’s condemnations of male draft dodger Ted Nugent to those she made of female draft dodger Bar Rafaeli.

  18. There are powerful forces—Big Oil, companies that want to do business in Iran—that would happily abandon a small, petro-dry nation with no resources.

    Israel has recently hit major off-shore natural gas finds. It also has oil shale. The former can now be economically turned into fuel oil and lubricants. The latter requires continued improvements in shale exploration to be economic.

    Israel could be a net energy exporter within the next decade.

  19. Dave Pinsen says: • Website

    The Gaza conflict demonstrates that land-for-peace doesn’t work. Israel gave up Gaza and pulled out its settlers 9 years ago. Those settlers had a thriving greenhouse business, selling produce to Europe. A handful of wealthy Jews bought the greenhouses from them and gave them to the Palestinians, who promptly looted them.

    For decades the Palestinians fought to get Israel to leave Gaza. And when Israel did, rather than building better lives for themselves there in peace, they built a rocket industry. This is nihilism.

    The solution to the conflict isn’t a Palestinian state, which would just be another Gaza; the solution is for Palestinians to be granted citizenship in neighboring Arab countries. Sweeten the pot with some cash, supplied by Israel and the gulf Arabs: say $50k per adult. Maybe throw a little cash to the receiving countries too.

    But no more UN-run “refugee” camps for Palestinians. No one else on earth remains a refugee for three generations. Sudeten Germans forced to move after World War II aren’t refugees now; neither are the hundreds if thousands of mideastern Jews forced to flee Arab countries 70 years ago; and neither are the millions of Indians displaced by the Pakistan partition.

    Wars end, and displaced persons become citizens of other countries. Palestinians were an exception to this only so they could be used as a political weapon against Israel. But Israel isn’t going anywhere, so it’s time to move on.

    Let Hamas stay in Gaza and have a Thermopylae if they want. The rest of the Palestinians should be free to start new lives elsewhere.

  20. J says: • Website

    Juan Cole in this blog has a cute video clip on “Where is Palestine”. It shows – in reverse -the slow but steady growth of the Jewish settlement in the country. Fred, sober up, who is winning?

  21. Blah says:

    Why don’t a couple or rich Jews buy resource rich land in Africa and create a state there?

  22. Svigor says:

    There was nothing Jewish about this. Most of history consists of groups conquering each other’s territory. When you do this, the conquered people hate you, and begin to resist. To control them you resort to the rifle butt, the torture chamber, the air strike, and the secret police. This makes them hate you more, world without end. Consider the occupation of Jewish Palestine by the Romans, the Jewish resistance, and Rome’s murderous responses.

    Fred, you silly man, the difference is “who-whom?”; Jews are the conquerors, the aggressors here, so here aggression and conquest are good.

    In the latter example, the Romans were the aggressors, the conquerors, and the Jews were the resisters, the defenders, so there aggression and conquest are bad.

    Get it straight, Fred.

    This means that Israel can never be a democracy because, if the Moslems had the vote, Israel would stop being a Jewish state and just be a country with a lot of Jews.

    According to the reigning Zeitgeist of the West, Israel can’t be a democracy because it doesn’t import “diversity,” i.e., peoples that are neither Caucasoid, nor of the majority. So, of course Israel isn’t a democracy.

    And intermarriage must be prevented at all costs, since Jews, of whom there are not many to begin with, could be bred out of existence.

    Yeah but Fred, worrying about being bred out of existence is “racist.” American Jewry’s been telling us so for 60 years. And enforcing this “anti-racism” with carrot and stick the whole time.

    In America politics regarding Israel are often bitter and even more confusing. For example, I know feminists hostile to Israel, which doesn’t mistreat women at all, yet well disposed to Moslems, for whom mere misogyny would be a great step upward. Many Jews of my acquaintance are ambivalent or confused, wanting Israel to survive yet loathing its government.

    My politics on the issue aren’t confusing at all. American Jews are both Israel’s BFF, their bankers and propagandists, and the political vanguard, the brain trust, of the movement opposing even the concept of European equivalents of Israel, never mind the reality. So, I oppose Jewry until Jewry stops opposing me (the supposed distinction between Israel and Jewry is laughable here).

    This is due in part to the immensely powerful Israel lobby in Washington, in part to a certain lack of enthusiasm for Moslems after 9/11, and in part to the lack of strong anti-Jewish sentiment in America.

    Don’t forget the unholy marriage between the Zionists (AKA neokahns, inter alia) and the Defense establishment: Jews lend their considerable money and power to the Defense establishment’s goal of keeping defense spending up and deployment on the table, while the Defense establishment lends military support to Zionist interests.

  23. Svigor says:

    This is nihilism.

    ^^^ This is demonization. Jews should be familiar.

    The solution to the conflict isn’t a Palestinian state, which would just be another Gaza; the solution is for Palestinians to be granted citizenship in neighboring Arab countries. Sweeten the pot with some cash, supplied by Israel and the gulf Arabs: say $50k per adult. Maybe throw a little cash to the receiving countries too.

    I’d support something like that to solve the West’s Jewish Problem; pay Jews to make Aliyah, pay Israel to receive them.

  24. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    How about the jews in America who are displaced people by their own admission should assimilate to our norms. That being Scots-Irish IMO, so America’s jews instead of implementing the hateful agenda of the Frankfurt School they can instead take up “fightin, fishin, huntin and shootin”, that there is good ol’ Americanism.

  25. SFG says:

    “How about the jews in America who are displaced people by their own admission should assimilate to our norms. That being Scots-Irish IMO, so America’s jews instead of implementing the hateful agenda of the Frankfurt School they can instead take up “fightin, fishin, huntin and shootin”, that there is good ol’ Americanism.”

    Why would they assimilate to the Southern norm if they don’t live in the South? I’d say they’ve become pretty effective New Yorkers. 😉

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  26. @SFG

    Wrong. New York has become effectively Jewish.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Fred Reed Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Not What Tom Jefferson Had in Mind
Sounds Like A Low-Ranked American University To Me
Very Long, Will Bore Hell Out Of Most People, But I Felt Like Doing It
It's Not A Job. It's An Adventure.
Cloudy, With Possible Tidal Wave