The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewFred Reed Archive
The Future of the Jews
More of the Past?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_489699337

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

It is strange: Jews have been disliked everywhere and in all times. The dislike appears in odd places. I was astonished to find that my Nepalese trekking guides were intensely hostile to Jews. They said that Jews (actually Israelis in most cases I think, but the Nepalese do not seem to make the distinction) were loud, demanding, and always trying to force down the guides’ fees. Historically the hostility has often been powerful and, not infrequently, murderous. Jews have been expelled from country after country, excluded from polite society, subjected to quotas,and required to live in certain regions. Why?

How much anti-Jewish hostility is there today in America? A lot? A little? Is it negligible? Potentially explosive? It is hard to tell because disliking Jews is often a firing offense, and a controlled press makes discussion impossible. A clue can perhaps be found in the comments sections of political websites where, protected by anonymity, commenters are often bitterly anti-Jewish. But then, these comments may, or may not, be the work of a few cranks.

Today there appear news stories about growing hostility on campuses, that Jews are fleeing Paris because of increased or more openly expressed dislike, or that the German Right, never fond of Jews, gains strength.

Since the dislike has existed for at least two thousand years, there must be some enduring reason or reasons. What?

One I think is the Space Alien Effect. It is human nature to dislike people different from oneself. This fact runs against today’s cult of diversity, which accounts for the disastrous reality of American life, but a glance around the world reveals that diversity causes most of the planet’s troubles: Sunni and Shia, Jew and Muslim, Tutsi and Hutu, black, white and brown in America, Tamil and Sinhalese; Turks and Kurds; Turks and Armenians; Thais and Muslims, Germans and Jews. Protestants and Catholics in Ireland, on and on for a very long list of religious, ethnic, and racial differences. Diversity is nobody’s strength.

Diversity often disappears through assimilation. Today people named O’Toole and Libertini may be proud of their ancestry, but they think of themselves as American, not as Irish and Italian. So do others. Thus hostility to them, once intense, has vanished.

Jews do not assimilate. Yes, they speak the same language, wear the same clothes, and peck at smartphones like everyone else. Yet they think of themselves as Jews. So, therefore, does everyone else. While there is no legal or moral reason why they should not so think of themselves, there are consequences: Human nature is what it is, regardless of whether we think it should be.

Specifically, Jews are always Them. We are Us. We are aware that Feinstein is Jewish as we are not aware that O’Malley is Irish–because he isn’t. Difference alone doesn’t cause antagonism. but makes it much more likely.

Worse–and this has caused millions of deaths–Jews are often successful. It doesn’t matter whether the success arises from superior intelligence, greater drive, collusion, or the will of Yahweh. It happens. Thus the pattern repeated over and over and over down the ages. Jews prosper, become rich, gain power sometimes abused, and become arrogant. If Christians did this–Bill Gates, or the Robber Barons of the Gilded Age–they would be resented as individuals perhaps, not as an ethnicity. But Jews are Them. The surrounding population feels colonized–by Them, by Space Aliens, by internal foreigners–and deeply resents it. As noted, the reaction may take the form of ostracism, enforced quotas, confinement to the Pale of Settlement, expulsion from the country, ghastly pogroms, or Auschwitz.

Hitler’s complaints against the Jews were along usual lines, that Jews controlled German culture, finance, academia, and the media. These are also things said in America today today on the internet against Jews . Whether these criticisms are true, fair, justified, or make sense does not matter. What matters is that people feel, or can easily be made to feel, controlled, by Them. Making a list of powerful Jews is sufficient and, with the internet, easy.

The dislike is profoundly visceral, not rational, tapping into deep wells of instinct that make little sense–which doesn’t matter. This can be seen in the wild disproportion between offense given and reaction. How do you get rationally in Germany from growlings in beer halls, “There are too damn many Jews in everything,” to “We should kill all the Jews”?

Them, not Us. It makes little obvious sense to say that Jews are not Americans. Bob Dylan isn’t an American? Lauren Bacall? Yet this is clearly how anti-Jewish commenters on the web see it. Them, not Us. It is a matter of limbic tribalism, which does not map well onto legal principles.

The hostility is often to Jews more as a metaphysical category than as actual people. Many who loathe Jews have little contact with them. Ask, “What have Jews actually done to you? Hacked your bank account? Gypped you out of your house? Shot your dog?” and the answer will likely be, “Nothing.” Rachel Cohen, the dentist next door in Peoria, is not easily envisioned as trying to destroy America, impose communism, or wreck the currency. Thus, “some of my best friends…but….” While the Jews one actually knows probably are not bad people, or at most annoying, The Jews collectively are a sort of ominous barely visible miasma. (For the record, no American Jew has ever harmed me, and many have helped me in what I humorously call “my career.” Coupla girlfriends, too.)

ORDER IT NOW

Importantly, Jewish presence is seen as Jewish conspiracy. Four Jews on the Supreme Court? From two percent of the population? My God, they must be up to something. A conspiracy, doubtless. But a conspiracy to do what? A candidate theory, correct as it happens, is that Jews as a people do anything and everything they can to advance the fortunes of Israel. But on the Supreme Court…how? Other suggestions are a desire to destroy the white race (including themselves?), to bring America down (why?), to wreck the international monetary system (why?), or to impose a Zionist world empire. Most of these make between little and no sense, which doesn’t matter. Jews don’t actually have to sacrifice Christian children to die for it. They just have to be thought to do so.

It is interesting that these usually nonexistent Jewish conspiracies get enduring attention while other, demonstrably real, conspiracies do not arouse similar ire. For example, the Koch brothers, who are not Jewish, have funded and led a massive and disguised campaign to subvert American politics for the benefit of big business. The arms industry bribes, suborns, and finagles to get the government to buy hugely expensive weapons. The FBI was recently caught trying to prevent the election of Donald Trump. The Clintons are crooked as kite string in a ceiling fan. So why do Jewish conspiracies, sometimes real but, more usually, imagined, get attention on the web?

The Space Alien Effect. Jews are Them. We are Us. Both know it.

The importance of this tribalism should not be underestimated. I once walked down Main Street in Farmville, Virginia, a small town in the Southside, with a friend. He said–I forget how the subject came up–with some bitterness, “The Jews own everything on Main Street. Just like they do everywhere.” He pointed to Rose’s, a perfectly ordinary department store. It did nothing wrong or even interesting. But it was Jewish. That was enough.

Them, not Us. The Presbyterian owners of a store actually engaged in gouging would have been resented as individuals, not as a tribe. The Jews.

Power and wealth are not necessary to engender slaughter. Mere difference, specifically not being Christian, has often been enough. History is littered with examples, of which Jews are well aware. When the First Crusade took Jerusalem in 1099, the Christian armies immediately burned the synagogue with the Jews inside. Why? The Jews had no part in the war, which was between Muslims and Christians.

This explains why Jews do not like Christianity, though the antipathy typically is (wisely) disguised as a principled adherence to the invented constitutional doctrine of separation of church and state. Note that while Americans think of the Holocaust as something the Germans did (I do) to Jews it can look like just another attack by a Christian country (Poland, Russia, England, the Baltics, and so on.) A Jewish friend once expressed the attitude as sometimes being, “Look what they have done to us. We can do anything we want to them.”

Here we encounter the unfortunate human tendency to blame entire groups for what a few members did. For example, the Jews killed Christ. “(Gosh, Rachel, you don’t look old enough.”) Or whites enslaved blacks. Actually, no one in the United States has been a slave, or owned one, for a century and a half. Most of liberal politics would wither to nothing if we accepted that people cannot be guilty of things they did not do.

It is not necessarily wise to be seen as trying to eliminate a majority religion.

Note that a people, though living always among others, can maintain characteristic over long periods. Recently I was reading Las Novelas Ejemplares of Cervantes, specifically La Gitnailla, which means very approximately The Little Gypsy Girl. It begins,

“Parece que los gitanos y gitanas solamente nacieron en el mundo para ser ladrones: nacen de padres ladrones, críanse con ladrones, estudian para ladrones y, finalmente, salen con ser ladrones corrientes.”

“It appears that gypsies are born only to be thieves. They are born as thieves, raised among thieves, study to be thieves, and finally end by being common thieves.”

Cervantes died in 1616, which makes the story over 400 years old. Yet this description of gypsies is their reputation today, very much supported by police files.They haven’t assimilated, and they haven’t changed. Jews of course have never been associated with burglary or picking pockets, but the passage makes clear that peoples can maintain characteristics over centurions.

Jews with remarkable consistency have been described for centuries as smart, greedy, combative, clannish, “pushy,” exploitative, and arrogant. This is how I hear them described in Mexico, where I live. (I think of these as Middle Eastern traits, but never mind.) Then there is chutzpah. which in practice seems to mean “brashly walking over other people.” It can leave others feeling bulldozed, defeated, used. This bruising of the ego, of self-respect, arouses a hostility all out of proportion to actual damage done. It is, or so I think, a major cause of dislike for Jews. Such descriptions are dismissed today as stereotypes. A stereotype is just the aggregate observation of many people over time.

Of course the evidence does not always support a particular explanation for avisible effect. A Jewish friend says, “We’re no more greedy than anyone else. We’re just good businessmen so we make money.” Those with money are usually described as greedy. I don’t think I have ever met a greedy Jew, though I have met many who were very careful with money. It doesn’t matter whether you really are greedy only that people think you are.

Chutzpah: When I was seven we lived in Arlington, Virginia, next to the Furmans, recently someone said, of Hell’s Kitchen, which I didn’t know what was. The Furmans were by no means bad people. One day Mrs. Furman came over and gave my mother a hard time because my little brother, five was playing with a kid across the street instead of little Andrew Furman. Mom had done nothing to influence my brother’s choice of friends. She, a quietly genteel woman from the Southside of Virginia, was horrified by the aggressiveness. She told me of this decades later, so it clearly made a bad impression. Thereafter, Them were not our kind of people. Small things can produce lifelong dislike.

In sum, Jews seem alien, smarter than others and far more aggressive than Christians, whom they seem to trample. Christians feel that they cannot compete, that they are outsmarted at every turn, or at least pushed around, and made victims. This bruising of the ego sets off irrational, serious hostility. It is the attitude of blacks toward whites, for the same reasons.

ORDER IT NOW

Finally there is Israel, the albatross around the Jewish neck, making it impossible for Jews quietly to be more or less normal Americans. To Jews Israel is of immense and understandable importance, but this enthusiasm brings up charges of dual loyalty or, often, loyalty exclusively to Israel. The truth of this doesn’t matter. It looks true, which is enough. Does Rachel the Jewish dentist in Peoria back Israel? To what extent? What does she think of Israeli behavior? We don’t know. We know that Jewish lobbies like AIPAC and the Neocons back Israel one hundred percent. And they control American Mid-Eastern policy. This is much noted on the Web.

Jewish backing for Israel requires emotional contortions since Israel is everything liberals, to include Jews, profess to hate, being racist–just now it is expelling blacks–religiously exclusive, an apartheid state, militaristic, and brutal in its treatment of Arabs. This I suspect bothers some Jews, but assuredly is a grave PR problem for the country. But then, as a small coastal enclave in a part of the world intensely hostile to it, a sort of second Crusader Kingdom, it is hard to see what choices it has. If it becomes democratic or allows extensive intermarriage, for example, it will quickly cease to be a Jewish state, and there is no way to rule nicely over a sea of people who want to kill you.

Is there a possibility of active anti-semitism in America? Yes. Why is America immune to a dislike that has influenced all of history?

Yet at the moment, no. No overt expression will soon occur, and perhaps never will. But the classic preliminary conditions exist and grow. The appearance of Jewish power is strong. Four of nine justices of the Supreme Court, a majority of Ivy presidents, CEOs of television networks. Zuckerberg of Facebook, Sergei Brin co-founder of Google. the New York Times, Time-Warner, Disney, much of Hollywood, huge parts of retail, most of the big publishing houses in New York. Anyone who has worked in Washington knows that Jewish control of Congress and the media is near absolute. The list could go on for pages. Things like this create a propagandist’s paradise..If America’s tight control over expression ever slipped, a would-be Adolf with Google searches could come up with a shocking list.

A rational person might ask, “So what?” Do the Supreme Court’s Jewish justices make Jewish decisions–whatever that might mean? Or do they vote like any four NPR listeners chosen at random? Did Mark Zuckerberg do anything underhanded? Or was he a very bright Jewish kid who had an idea and the strength of character to push it into existence? Does Schultz of Starbucks do something evil, or does he, like, you know, sell reasonably good coffee at a reasonable price?

It doesn’t matter. They are there, so they must be conspiring. And their influence is becoming more obvious, as with Trump’s subservience (as seen by much of the world) to Israel in planning to move the embassy.

People who think they are defending Jews will point to Jewish contributions to nearly everything–science, music, math, technology, literature, charity, medicine, support for symphonies. These contributions are real and immense. With respect to anti-Jewish politics, they are also irrelevant or worse. Since the hostility to Jews rests largely on their excessive presence (again, in the eyes of the anti-Jewish) pointing to their intellectual contributions just increases the dislike. It emphasizes both the Jewish presence and apparent superiority.

Happy, prosperous societies seldom form lynch mobs. When things break down, when hope wanes, expectations fall, and near-desperation sets in, explosions come. Today the United States quite arguably heads into a Weimar-like future of chaos and social violence. This may sound crazy…but is it? Nobody thought such a highly civilized country as Germany capable of Treblinka.

America is not really stable. Political animosity runs high, racial hostility is great and growing, standards of living fall, offshoring and automation leave the young with nowhere for their lives to go. Wealth goes rapidly from the many to the few and what was the working class falls into drugs and anomie. The wars never end. Infrastructure ages and falls behind that of more advanced nations. Anger grows. As the pie shrinks, someone will have to get less pie.

It is hard to see how this can continue forever. My guess is that the fighting–”unrest” is the polite term–will break out first between white and black. Whites are quiescent now, but see their lives worsening and their world deteriorating. The kneelers in the NFL, the rioters in Ferguson are much more visible than Jews.

But if unrest starts, someone will say “Wall Street!” and that will mean “the Jews,” and all the rest will follow. Whether any of it makes sense will not matter in the least.

Let us hope I am crazy. But it is not, I think, the way to bet.

(Republished from Fred on Everything by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: Anti-Semitism, Israel Lobby, Jews 
Hide 817 CommentsLeave a Comment
817 Comments to "The Future of the Jews"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    More of the past? Nope. It is just a question of how many goyim will be nuked.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "It is just a question of how many goyim will be nuked."

    Not that many, if you are honest.

    "People don’t like Jews because Jews don’t practice the Golden Rule of treating others as they would like to be treated themselves."

    Some people, absolutely.

    And, of course Fred is not completely accurate when he said that "Jews do not assimilate".

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/are-us-jews-assimilating-out-of-existence

    "David Goldman--Sadly, American Jews stand out as a horrible example of demographic failure. In the United States, secular and loosely affiliated American Jews, that is, the vast majority, have the lowest fertility rate of any identifiable segment of the American population. As I wrote in my book How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too):

    Nowhere is the fertility gap between religious and non-religious more extreme than among American Jews. As a group, American Jews show the lowest fertility of any ethnic group in the country. That is a matter of great anguish for Jewish community leaders. According to sociologist Steven Cohen, “We are now in the midst of a non-Orthodox Jewish population meltdown. … Among Jews in their 50s, for every 100 Orthodox adults, we have 192 Orthodox children. And for the non-Orthodox, for every 100 adults, we have merely 55 such children.”

    Half of the non-Orthodox children, moreover, marry non-Jews, and very few children of mixed marriages will remain Jewish. As Reform Rabbi Lance J Sussman wrote in 2010, “With the exception of a number of Orthodox communities and a few other bright spots in or just off the mainstream of Jewish religious life, American Judaism is in precipitous decline … the Reform movement has probably contracted by a full third in the last ten years!”
    , @Return of Shawn
    It's all very simple. Fundamentally, Jews have been disliked because, as part of their Jewish identity, those with power pursue, often successfully, their perceived interests which often conflict with the perceived interests of another group(s).
    , @Josecanuc
    I knew years ago that the Jews “will will the void” (Nietzsche) i.e., the annihilation of mankind - “rather than void their will” i.e., their covenant with YHWH. A business contract t- this is why Jews considered it a ‘burden and yoke’ - hat obliges them to become - one way or another - the end justifies any and all means:

    \(1) mankind’s blessing and light - and because the chosen people lack genuine character to
    accomplish this - they have to subjugate him thoroughly first -

    (2) to uplift mankind the only way they possibly can which is by thoroughly Judiazing him - conditioning him slowly but surely to worship only himself and money (
    which you have almost accomplished in the already hopelessly subjugated Christian West);

    (3) to heal and cure the world - which it appears that the only way you can do it is by doing the exactly opposite - i.e., by making mankind as insane demented and unbalanced and unconscious as possible since the goyim i.e., your cattle and slaves - don’t really need to think about anything else but grazing and living anyway - because as Josephus of Alexandria wrote:
    “The Jewish Nation stands above other Nations as the Head above the Body”

    The chosen people have one thing in common with many Catholic pedophile priests which - because of their delusions and compulsions - refuse to acknowledge and accept - that the worst sin of all is to do well that which should not be done at all.

    Whether any of it makes sense will not matter in the least. for the sake of mankind Let’s hope the Jews never fulfill their covenant . But all things consider - it is not, I think, the way to bet.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. I am reminded…

    Here we have the eternal cry (at least it’s beginning to feel eternal) of the unhappy feminist: “The whole world can’t stand me. What’s wrong with the whole world?”

    – Fred Reed, “In Search Of Men Who Want To Marry Mommy: Jocasting About” (2005)

    Otto Weininger was right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SMK
    The Jews are fleeing Paris because of the invasion of Jew-hating Muslims, not because the the LePens, who want to end Muslim immigration, and massively deport and expel Muslims. The Jews as a group support the invasion of Muslims and black Africans, just as they want to turn the U.S. into a nonwhite-majority country to prevent the rise of a Nazi-like regime and simply as vengeance for the Holocaust and centuries of anti-Jewish discrimination.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Fred Reed.

    The Jews.

    Hmmmmm … think I’ll go make some popcorn. This is apt to be a long and colorful set of comments.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Paw
    Author is very carefully selective and in many words to say ordinary , nothing concrete.Avoiding everything inform or solve nothing.
    Wothless and useless and really just jelly.
    , @Colleen Pater
    "How much anti-Jewish hostility is there today in America? A lot? A little? Is it negligible? Potentially explosive? It is hard to tell because disliking Jews is often a firing offense, and a controlled press makes discussion impossible. A clue can perhaps be found in the comments sections of political websites where, protected by anonymity, commenters are often bitterly anti-Jewish. But then, these comments may, or may not, be the work of a few cranks."


    This is a question that has moving parts.There might be a lot of hostility today and was very little a few decades ago because what was once thought behavior we could afford or was perhaps thought a temporary reaction to WW2 now seems much more insidious. Or any of a dozen similar relationships. I have always noticed jewish behavior being a new yorker, but had until very recently been rather indulgent about it.They say things fall apart slowly then all at once.Sometimes you notice a pattern, you even understand all sorts of greater implications, but somehow the full impact never really really registers and then it does all at once.
    Also a moving part is going to be what did jews think they could do in the 50s and what do they think they can do and say today. Tim wise wouldn't have dared say kill the white man in the 50s but today he gets paid a lot to say that sort of thing.
    And probably most important for any foreigner group ( their choice not ours) is what is not said or done. as with the blacks hispanics muslims and perverts,there's pretty much zero countering to the leftist jew positions particularly among the majority. Any group can afford a few nut job loudmouths as long as the group makes clear they are outcasts when the group makes clear no such thing then those become the spokesmen for the group and claiming otherwise is bull.
    My guess is we are at an inflection point or rather they are, they seem to go through this cycle everywhere everytime. They have acted disgracefully to the people who saved their asses and those people are beginning to wise up.They have set in motion an existential threat to the west which will have to be destroyed by the west. The jews being its author will surely get whats coming unless they can for once just stop it and reverse course immediately at full speed and be seen to be as actively countering the leftist Golem they summoned as they spent energy in their engineering it. I think there is enough residual tolerance yet in whites in the USA towards jews that they could eek out a reversal, but only if it were a unprecedented reversal basically 90% of jews become moldbug and miller. thats not going to happen. so jews are like some dysfunctional family member play out yet again their psychodrama and no doubt in 50 years will be using this as yet more proof they have to act that way because everyone hates them.what did einstein say about doing the same thing over and expecting different results?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    People don’t like Jews because Jews don’t practice the Golden Rule of treating others as they would like to be treated themselves. Instead they force goyim to live by certain rules that Jews themselves would never follow such as political correctness, immigration, assimilation, the list goes on and on.

    Jews are power hungry. They have a winner take all view on life where you are on top or you are a lowly goyim.

    Jews are very subversive taking part in clannish divide and conquer to get power.

    Jews are perverts. They rule the porn industry and look at how they wield power in Hollywood raping all the time.

    Read More
    • Agree: AndrewR, Druid
    • Replies: @Wally
    Poor Fred, a dilettante in denial of the obvious.

    "We can force through any lie. It just has to be big enough so that a normal person says, 'Well that cannot be a lie!'. Then the lie cannot be recognized as such. And the lie has to be repeated continuously. Then it is believed and is powerful because it is the belief in a 'truth.'"
    - from 'Propaganda', by Zionist Jew Edward Bernays
     
    Under the spell of Zionist propaganda, Freshman Fred embarrassingly refers to the thoroughly debunked Auschwitz. The claims of it are scientifically impossible.
    recommended:
    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/img/HHS-300x127.jpg
    and:
    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau
    https://youtu.be/SUc6Y_E5zb0

    www.codoh.com
    , @pyrrhus
    The problems are twofold: that most Jews have divided loyalties, of which the loyalty to Israel and their ethnicity generally reigns supreme.A man cannot serve two masters. Hence Israel can have 3 walls and reject any immigrants, but America can't do the same; and second, that Jews do not have the same ethical standards regarding the goyim, whom they regard as chumps to be fleeced, as the goyim have toward them. A subset of that fact is that Jews are highly nepotistic toward their ethnicity, yet scream anti-semitism anytime they don't get preferred treatment.
    There are obviously a fair number of exceptions, but the overall effect is of a parasite gnawing its way through American society.
    , @in the middle
    Its not Jews' problem, since YOU, the goyim, purchase their merchandise! If I refuse to purchase the next Iphone, or newest smart phone for example, by goodness sake, I will not buy it. I still use the IPHONE 3! and it works. The purchase hungry goyim keeps buying the next thing on TV, and keeps getting in debt to whom? obviously the talmidist. I don't call them "jews' that is a made up word from the 1800s, out of the word "Judean". Rather, I call them Talmudists, or Khazars; more appropriate. My grand Father was Sephardi, and don't recall him jewing any body. (trying to take advantage of others). Thus, they charlatans who "call themselves Jews and are not." don't bother me, I am not participating in their enrichment. I don't go either to see the garbage in theaters that they produce. So who are the suckers then? Goyim of course!
    , @tomo
    You are right - that is the real issue. I have a lot of Jewish friends and studied with them (at one of the best unis in the world). I've worked with them. I am yet to meet a very clever Jew - they are always average at best in intelligence (and the ones I studied with worked hard and were very geeky). It's just one of jew-fake superiority promoting myths perpetuated by Hollywood and other loud megaphones they own and operate in a predatory way so to exploit others.
    None of my Jewish friends ever talks about how Palestinians are treated in their apartheid state.
    When I lived in LA I met many of the Jewish people on board of Jewish owned art foundations (none of them was really talented or able to judge who is) - heavily promoting Jews.
    I think the good explanation of their mentality is psychopathy.
    It seems to be a culture like a corporation (another good metaphor for psychopathy) - where they have no mercy, no desire to help, but a strong desire to exploit and to turn their victims against them so to make it easier to exploit or destroy them.
    Jews are also not happy - psychopaths/psycho cultures never are.
    it's a sickness
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. fnn says:

    So you’re saying the Nepali mountain guides are Hitlerites?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    There is a simpler explanation. For obvious reasons, Israelis are terribly fond of third-worlders.
    , @dearieme
    Literally Hitlerites.
    , @ronhan
    Sounds like most of the world are hitlerites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Hitler’s complaints against the Jews were along usual lines, that Jews controlled German culture, finance, academia, and the media.

    Hatred of Jews may have ranked much lower with Hitler and the top Nazis than did making them and other groups targets for political gain.

     Note that while Americans think of the Holocaust as something the Germans did (I do) to Jews it can look like just another attack by a Christian country (Poland, Russia, England, the Baltics, and so on.)

     
    Israel Shamir, who comments here (a Jew in a former incarnation) would strongly protest including Russia in this indictment

    https://robertmagill.wordpress.com/2017/12/15/hark-what-voice-is-that-its-silence/

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @polaco
    The 1918 communist revolution in Germany, which nearly succeeded, was backed by the Soviets. The German people were aware of the Jews' prominent role in it.
    , @Wally
    Magill's quoted, absurd Zionist lies:

    "Before piling on a lot of statistics let’s take care of one huge number of those murdered in the camps. Three million Soviet Prisoners of War were killed. Has anyone ever heard the story of even one survivor from among these millions slaughtered? Silence. The Jews have a name for the Holocaust; the Shoah. The survivors among the Romani, better known as the Gypsies, who lost between 500,000 and 1,500,000 also have a name for the genocide; the Pořajmos. The Roma are a private, basically pre-literate people, seemingly without a public voice. More Silence.
    Early on in the purges the Nazis, practitioners of the then popular ‘Science’ of Eugenics, killed 100,000 mentally ill German adults in institutions to cleanse the ‘folk’ of this contamination and perhaps, to begin to learn the death trade. Deep Silence. The Jehovah’s Witnesses refused the Nazi system and contributed their dead to the carnage. Still Silent. Thousands of male homosexuals added to the homegrown bloodbath as well. Heard anything from any of the survivors lately? Silence Again."
     
    Also note that Macgill uses Zionist Wikipedia as a source, where Jews alter everything that is in their interest. see: Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    The 'homosexuals & gypsies' canard is merely an attempt by Jews to buy votes for their laughable and impossible '6M & gas chambers'.

    'the Gypsy 'extermination' Big Lie debunked'
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1744

    'Gypsy Holocaust?
    The Gypsies under the National Socialist Regime'
    By Carlo Mattogno
    http://codoh.com/library/document/3239/

    The Myth of a Nazi Extermination of Homosexuals by Jack Wikoff
    http://www.cwporter.com/homo.htm

    Gypsies and Homosexuals in the Camps
    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1894

    homosexuals - Yad Vashem ...
    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1930

    , @jack daniels
    This article seems to waffle on every point -- always a good idea when talking about forbidden topics. Jewish power is obvious in the danger of talking about Jewish power. I grew up in a Jewish neighborhood and my best friends were Jews-- which, btw, is NOT a bad argument against accusations of 'anti-Semitism', a term that is never defined anyway, since defining it would reveal it to be within the spectrum of normal opinion. I noticed quickly that Jews were brighter than others, fond of disputation, very left-wing in politics, culturally literate, and rather contemptuous of middle America. I like Jews and I like Chinese food but I don't want it for every meal. For a distinctive and tiny group to have such power over the rest is inherently unstable. Jews are happy to join in with Muslim-bashing, which may take the form of invasions in which hundreds of thousands die for the purpose of installing a tyrant like al-Sisi or worthless playboy sheik. They are happy to bash the Catholic church and the flaws of Catholics (e.g. Senator McCarthy's Irish Catholic background is fingered by historian Melvin Leffler), and happy to ridicule and warn against the fundamentalist Protestants, or, once upon a time, snotty Episcopalians. They think it's their right to have political views that start to the left of where other people's leave off, still advocating the politics of Lenin or Mao, and the sexual radicalism of Reich. They are happy to talk as if their radical opinions were centrist in the hope of moving the center, a strategy that seems to work. Yet they are happy to lobby for laws that jail not only anti-Semites, but also an increasing list of 'haters' who offend other victim groups that they get to designate. Next thing you know, it's illegal to hold any of your grandfather's views on anything.
    Many Jews are aware there are problems with forcing gentiles to live in too Jewish an environment, and have humorously portrayed it. An old National Lampoon piece Invasion of the Body Snatchers imagines "Jews from another planet" taking over Whiteville -- very funny but all too real. Another piece, When the Goddam Jews Take Over America, by underground cartoonist R. Crumb (married to a Jew) also as prescient as funny. Now, lots of Jews are not like the stereotype and oppose Holocaust Denier laws and criticize Jewish slumlords and I have even heard Jews defend the anti-Semitism of the Nation of Islam, but their laudable tolerance is less consequential than the intolerance of the ones who want to parlay Jewish victimhood into a norm where Jews, as Master Victims, decide who can say what. Diversity is good, and in the name of Diversity I would like to live in a society where Mayberry RFD and Tallman, NY can coexist without either being shelled by the DHS.
    What needs to be done: a) people in a position to take the risk need to introduce respectful but frank discussion of the Jewish role in promoting censorship; b) spying and censorship by common carriers like Microsoft, Facebook, Google, and the NSA for that matter must be outlawed. c) conservatives must use wedge issues to break up the Rainbow Coalition even at the cost of losing their beloved tax cuts. Gratuitous bashing of blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims must be set aside until we stop losing our liberties to candidates elected by bloc voting. d) Politically incorrect advocacy groups should use polygraphs to out the subversives who abound in their ranks. e) The "War on Terror" must be ended as must any wars more than ten years old.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Svigor says:

    The dislike is profoundly visceral, not rational, tapping into deep wells of instinct that make little sense–which doesn’t matter. This can be seen in the wild disproportion between offense given and reaction. How do you get rationally in Germany from growlings in beer halls, “There are too damn many Jews in everything,” to “We should kill all the Jews”?

    It’s easy – just be a disingenuous, senile old fuck like Fred Reed, and write it down and publish it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Svigor says:

    I was astonished to find that my Nepalese trekking guides were intensely hostile to Jews. They said that Jews (actually Israelis in most cases I think, but the Nepalese do not seem to make the distinction) were loud, demanding, and always trying to force down the guides’ fees. Historically the hostility has often been powerful and, not infrequently, murderous. Jews have been expelled from country after country, excluded from polite society, subjected to quotas,and required to live in certain regions. Why?

    LOL.

    No, see, this is just brainwashing by the Great Global Antisemitic Conspiracy. They read some virulent antisemitism online first. Then, primed for antisemitism, they saw bad behavior from Jews where it didn’t exist.

    How much anti-Jewish hostility is there today in America? A lot? A little? Is it negligible? Potentially explosive? It is hard to tell because disliking Jews is often a firing offense, and a controlled press makes discussion impossible.

    Yeah, no recipe for animus there.

    Countersemitism is probably less common than the countersemites think, and more common than the philosemites think.

    Jewish success isn’t the problem. Jews are very fond of this answer, because it strokes their ethnic egos, and feeds their dindu nuffin culture (nobody, I mean NOBODY, does dindu culture like the Jews), but it’s silly. Whites are rich tourists; did your Nepalese friends say they didn’t like whites? Or do you suppose they bitch to their Jewish clients about whites? I suppose it’s possible.

    Countersemitism thrives despite an extremely hostile environment (it’s firing, ruination, and unpersoning stateside; prison time in Europe) because there are much better reasons for it than envy. No serious person takes up countersemitism trivially; the cost is too high. There are far easier ways to work out one’s psychological needs, if that’s the only motive. No, countersemitism is driven by altruism.

    Finally there is Israel, the albatross around the Jewish neck, making it impossible for Jews quietly to be more or less normal Americans.

    Jews make it impossible. All they have to do is what whites would do; turn on Israel the way whites turned on South Africa. All they have to do is be consistent in their leftism, and subject themselves to the same rules that they enforce on others. You just glide past this and start yakking about Israel; what they do is their business, what the Jewish diaspora does is our business.

    Whites and Jews really are different.

    Jewish behavioral profile: “we should be the last people to have to live by the rules we push on everyone else.”
    White behavioral profile: “we can’t push rules on everyone else that we aren’t already living by ourselves.”

    A rational person might ask, “So what?” Do the Supreme Court’s Jewish justices make Jewish decisions–whatever that might mean? Or do they vote like any four NPR listeners chosen at random? Did Mark Zuckerberg do anything underhanded? Or was he a very bright Jewish kid who had an idea and the strength of character to push it into existence? Does Schultz of Starbucks do something evil, or does he, like, you know, sell reasonably good coffee at a reasonable price?

    It doesn’t matter. They are there, so they must be conspiring. And their influence is becoming more obvious, as with Trump’s subservience (as seen by much of the world) to Israel in planning to move the embassy.

    A rational person might point to the Jews and their leftism, support for “diversity” and such. Jews say “we need black faces here, brown faces,” etc., but then we’re not supposed to turn around and say, “fine, we need white gentile faces in here”? Sauce, gander. Jews see removal of Jews as antisemitism, so we should see removal of white gentile faces as anti-white racism. Let Jews and all the rest advocate for their own representation, and we whites will advocate for ours.

    That’s the rational response.

    People who think they are defending Jews will point to Jewish contributions to nearly everything–science, music, math, technology, literature, charity, medicine, support for symphonies. These contributions are real and immense. With respect to anti-Jewish politics, they are also irrelevant or worse. Since the hostility to Jews rests largely on their excessive presence (again, in the eyes of the anti-Jewish) pointing to their intellectual contributions just increases the dislike. It emphasizes both the Jewish presence and apparent superiority.

    Nah. Jews follow whites around, the same way blacks do. Jews need whites, to live in white countries, the same way blacks do. Jews chimp out at the thought of being excluded from white communities or countries, the same way blacks do. That burning need is not the hallmark of superiority. Whites, on the other hand, don’t need either group. They certainly don’t need to follow either around, or go ape at the idea of being excluded from their communities or countries.

    This explains a lot of the chip on the Jewish shoulder. Jews have a love-hate, superiority-inferiority complex going with whites, big time.

    America is not really stable.

    Owed mostly to diversity, which in turn is owed largely to the Jews, and their tireless efforts from 1924 to 1965 to pry open our borders.

    Read More
    • Agree: renfro
    • Replies: @daniel le mouche
    Excellent comment, thank you. The thrust of Fred's article was simply, 'It doesn't matter.' But it does.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Your btinging up Fred's story of the Nepalese guides rang a few bells.

    Michael Backman, a once respected journalist/commentator in what used to be Australia's dominant broadsheet press got sacked for writing much the same presimably under pressure from the Jewish lobby. To refresh my memory I just Googled "Michael Backman Istaelis" which got me his apparently taking a Phil Giraldi line then I added "Nepal" and got this at the top

    https://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/23/backman-column-israeli-lobby-censorship/

    I remember meeting an interesting young Israeli couple, just ex IDF, at 12000 feet and on the way up to l6000 feet plus all, in their case, on foot carrying everything. They were serious and direct and uncompromising in criticisms. Later some Jewish friends pointed to the Israeli reputation (still I suppose) for rudeness by I guess modern European standards. My limited impression within Israel was that there were storemen in supermarkets who would like the chestbeating rights of a paratroop general who had jumped first into Entebbe (and of course didn't thump his chest but was quietly impressive - and devoted to a children's charity).
    , @John Gruskos
    Svigor,

    Your idealism and altruism are wasted on Fred Reed.

    He isn't arguing in good faith.

    He is just writing lies, which he knows full well to be lies, to provoke the anger of his audience, for his own amusement. I believe they call it "trolling".

    The only way antisemitism will ever go away is if more members of the Jewish elite follow the lead of Ron Unz and Stephen Miller and make a good faith effort to use their influence for the benefit of the host community. (If you made a list of the 100,000 most influential Jews in America, would there be anyone on that list other than Unz and Miller who is favorably disposed towards old-stock Americans?)

    Trolls like Fred Reed, on the other hand, will reliably increase antisemitism every time they get access to a keyboard. They will be perceived as toadies of the hostile Jewish elite, and unfortunately all Jews will receive a share of the animus stirred up by the all too numerous likes of Fred Reed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Svigor says:

    Fred is a shitty accountant. He’s got this account he’s reviewing, and for some reason when it comes to this account, he forgets how accounting works. Fred knows all about the red ink (positive Jewish contributions), but when it comes to red ink (negative Jewish contributions) he never heard of it.

    That’s no way to balance the books.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Svigor says:

    Edit: make that “Fred knows all about the black ink”, obviously.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. Svigor says:

    The dislike is profoundly visceral, not rational, tapping into deep wells of instinct that make little sense–which doesn’t matter. This can be seen in the wild disproportion between offense given and reaction. How do you get rationally in Germany from growlings in beer halls, “There are too damn many Jews in everything,” to “We should kill all the Jews”?

    It’s easy – just be a disingenuous, senile old fuck like Fred Reed, and write it down and publish it.

    On second reading, I realized that I’d misread Fred here. Part of it is Fred’s rambling, half-assed style, and the preceding paragraphs, but I misinterpreted him. Mea culpa.

    I thought he was saying that modern countersemitism = “we should kill all the Jews.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Very fair-minded (Unzian) to see that the Freshmen from Parkland — the ones who did not get face-time on CNN — got a chance to submit essays.

    That’s what this opus is, right? — a high school freshman first draft at “What I Did on My Jewishy Vacation?”

    Since the writer of this particular piece of dreck is obviously a novice at lining up thoughts and assigning words to them, charity demands a D+.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. Stealth says:

    Fred, you know we love most of your columns, but this one is deeply flawed:

    Specifically, Jews are always Them. We are Us.

    That’s it, huh? Then why did you go on to write the following?

    Anyone who has worked in Washington knows that Jewish control of Congress and the media is near absolute.

    That doesn’t sound like being hated for the offense of simply being different; that sounds like something that would piss people off.

    They said that Jews (actually Israelis in most cases I think, but the Nepalese do not seem to make the distinction) were loud, demanding, and always trying to force down the guides’ fees.

    Implicit in this is that the Nepalese don’t dislike most other foreign visitors as much as they do the Israelis. And what had the Israelis done, other than just what the Nepalese guides said? Failed to assimilate into the culture of Nepal while on vacation there? I think your’re kind of undermining your central thesis with this one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nsa
    Fred the apologist clearly states the jooies exercise "near absolute control" of Wash DC i.e. the goy 98% of the US population has essentially been disenfranchised. That's not a reason to hate on the vile conniving jooies?
    , @Loveofknowledge
    I felt the same way, that this column was sort of schizophrenic. He describes all the real fundamental reasons why the non-Jewish majority would be frustrated with Jews... and then says any dislike of Jews is all just silly and irrational.

    I thought this was very well put:

    The surrounding population feels colonized–by Them, by Space Aliens, by internal foreigners–and deeply resents it. As noted, the reaction may take the form of ostracism, enforced quotas, confinement to the Pale of Settlement, expulsion from the country, ghastly pogroms, or Auschwitz.
     
    Amy Chua's book World on Fire is about this general phenomenon of "internal colonization" (she doesn't use that term but I like it) and the resulting backlash.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @fnn
    So you're saying the Nepali mountain guides are Hitlerites?

    There is a simpler explanation. For obvious reasons, Israelis are terribly fond of third-worlders.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. lavoisier says: • Website

    Animus goes much deeper than simple resentment at Jewish success.

    It is because of the destruction of our once stable society and the implosion of Western European nations under cultural currents unleased by the Jews that is the source of that animus.

    Speak honestly Fred and stop the tangential and mealy mouthed explanations for the animus.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    It isn't just cultural currents unleashed; it's deliberate destruction planned by institutional Jewry. Barbara Specter's married to the chief rabbi of Sweden and says Europe's "too monolithic," meaning "too white." She says Jews will be resented for their leading role in making Europe multicultural, i.e., non-white majority. Right you are, Barbara.

    1,200+ rabbis in the U.S. came out for unchecked immigration of "refugees" and Adelson, Saban, Gelbaum, the ADL, the AJC, the HIAS, and BB are all for open borders. And the utter destruction of white America.

    Jews played a huge role in Bolshevism, in putsches in Hungary, Austria, and Germany, and in Holodomor. "Jew" and "communist" were practically synonymous in 1930s America and Israel ran Pollard, one of the most destructive spies ever known in America. Jews have also done their utmost to push the most destructive aspects of the civil rights disaster.

    Israel went to war against the U.S. with its deliberate attack on the USS Liberty with machine gunning of our sailors trying to make it into the lifeboats. It's protestations of "mistake" were transparent lies.

    AIPAC ensures that billions from the treasury are squandered every year on an enemy nation that tries to involve us in fighting their wars for local hegemony. Is greater Israel also one of our projects?

    Finally, institutional Jewry does everything in its power to distort National Socialism as "right-wing" to deflect attention from the leftist essence of totalitarian destruction, torture, theft, and murder and the disproportionate Jewish role in extreme leftist movements. The Jewish obsession with "The" Holocaust is the ultimate "holocaust denial." And woe betide he who cares to point that out. "The" Holocaust pales in comparison to the communist ones? Hater!!

    What is not to loathe in organized Jewry?

    I know of decent, patriotic Jews but I know of few Jews who dare to speak out against what I have mentioned. I would be attacked for "anti-Semitism" long before such voices are heard.

    Fred us always a great read and a personal hero of mine. However, he missed the target here with his discussion of a bland "otherness." Reading excerpts from the Talmud and quotes from the great Rabbi Schneerson reveals that there is indeed some virulent Jewish hatred of the goyim out there. Bland otherness is not what I'm picking up.
    , @jacques sheete

    Animus goes much deeper than simple resentment at Jewish success.
     
    Yes, it does.


    “”Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.”
    Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat.”According to Yosef, death has “no dominion” over non-Jews in Israel.
    "Hate the Gentile!" Israel’s Racist Rabbis, by JONATHAN COOK
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/12/10/israel-s-racist-rabbis/
     
    I would suggest Freddy read about the Babylonian Talmud as well, but I doubt he will. He's accomplished his goal which is to call attention to himself.

    You'd think a self proclaimed "genius" could do better.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Stealth says:

    For someone who thinks antisemitism is irrational, Fred, you sure do seem to provide a lot of rational sounding reason for disliking the Jews.

    Note: I haven’t encountered any Jews who were pushy or hostile with me. I’ve known Jews from work, school and the community, and they don’t seem any more likely to be aggressive, in the interpersonal sense, than anyone else. I think this tendency has been exaggerated – a lot. When I was in my early twenties my blond shiksa cousin had a couple of Jewish friends she would take with her when she visited. Trust me, the only aggressive and mean one in the bunch was my cousin. The two Jewish girls were good company, and my friends and I were always happy to socialize with them. The one Jewish kid in my class would never have been described as aggressive by anyone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "The dislike is profoundly visceral, not rational, tapping into deep wells of instinct that make little sense–which doesn’t matter."
    "I haven’t encountered any Jews who were pushy or hostile with me."
    -- On making little sense and on personal experience: http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/aipac-returns-to-washington/#comments
    "Three months ago, the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act was approved by the House of Representatives with 402 affirmative votes and only two libertarian-leaning congressmen voting “no.” The Israel Anti-Boycott Act that is also currently making its way through a Senate committee would set a new standard for deference to Israeli interests on the part of the national government. It would criminalize any U.S. citizen “engaged in interstate or foreign commerce” who supports a boycott of Israel or who even goes about “requesting the furnishing of information” regarding it, with penalties enforced through amendments of two existing laws, the Export Administration Act of 1979 and the Export-Import Act of 1945, that include potential fines of between $250,000 and $1 million and up to 20 years in prison. According to the Jewish Telegraph Agency, the Senate bill was drafted with the assistance of AIPAC."
    -- Should not this affront to the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights (free speech, Mr. Reed? no "encountered" pushiness, Ms. Stealth?) warrant a deep dislike of the Lobby by all intelligent and honest people?
    The whoring US Congress has been acting against all rules of dignity by supporting the "special rights" of Israel. Why? -- Because of being bribed with contributions from wealthy Israel-firsters and because of the well-documented history of the Lobby's vicious attacks against any elected official that dared to stand for the US interests instead of standing for Israeli interests.
    Why don't you look at the root of the problem -- the tribal solidarity of chosen, which trumps both decency and fairness and which betrays the interests of a host country. (While the "dearest" Jewish dream is to "return" to Jerusalem, the majority of Jews prefer to live within Western civilization and away from the Soviet/theocratic state of Israel). Just read carefully a story of Purim, where an obnoxious uncle, disrespectful towards the traditions of host country, primes his "niece" (or his concubine, according some sources) -- which he sold to the Persian king -- to extract from the king a permission to kill all 75.000 enemies of the uncle -- the whole families, including children. Despite the gruesome history, Israelis hate Persia (Iran) viscerally. https://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/18/queen-esther-s-weapons-of-mass-seduction/
    The same visceral hatred towards Russia fills currently the hearts of ziocons (see the decisive role of the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russian tragedy of the 20 century). Ths hatred has been expressed in the 2014 coup d'etat in Ukraine (organized as a collaborative enterprise between ziocons and Ukrainian neo-Nazis) and in the ongoing demonization of Russain Federation for its role in protecting a sovereignty of Syria and stopping the bloodshed there.
    Since 1999, the Middle East lost 4 million people of all ages to the Israel-inspired interventions. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/The%20Zionist%20Plan%20for%20the%20Middle%20East.pdf
    There have been no mass protests by the American Jews against the Lobby and its treasonous policies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Svigor says:

    Since the writer of this particular piece of dreck is obviously a novice at lining up thoughts and assigning words to them, charity demands a D+.

    Fred’s schtick seems to be to get 3/4s of a way through a thought, then move on to the next. If you dot all the i’s and cross all the t’s and carry out the 3/4 thoughts to their 1.0 conclusions and connect all the dots, you get Julius Streicher.

    Fred, you know we love most of your columns, but this one is deeply flawed:

    I don’t. I find him rather tiresome. He just stirs the shit and collects a check (I assume he’s getting paid here, even if only indirectly by gaining a wider audience). I usually don’t bother reading his stuff.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    For one who usually doesn’t read his stuff, you sure do go on about it. And on and on and on.
    , @Discard
    Fred is not talking to counter-Semites, he is subverting the normies. My take is that Fred goes 3/4 of the way through the topic, and leaves the i dotting and t crossing to his readers. What you figure out for yourself sticks better than what you're told. And after all, how long would he keep his job if he openly went Julius Stretcher?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Svigor says:

    Fred’s schtick seems to be to get 3/4s of a way through a thought, then move on to the next. If you dot all the i’s and cross all the t’s and carry out the 3/4 thoughts to their 1.0 conclusions and connect all the dots, you get Julius Streicher.

    And fill in all parts Fred leaves blank, of course (Jewish role in genocidal period of Soviet history, Jewish role as medieval bailiffs and oppressors, Frankfurt School et al, etc., etc., etc.).

    Read More
    • Replies: @in the middle
    Talmudists, are the worst killers there is! In the period of their control of the Soviet Union, 60 million died in their killer hands! So there, Talmidists, worst killers; probably Gengis kan was talmidist!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Svigor says:

    OT:

    https://nypost.com/2018/03/02/california-dems-hard-left-turn-could-be-the-whole-partys-future/

    Finally, the convention took a sharp anti-Israel turn, adopting planks in support of the Boycott, Divest and Sanctions movement and slapping the Israel Defense Forces.

    Historically, the Golden State has been a harbinger of national trends. If that holds true, the whole Democratic Party is headed right . . . er, left . . . off the cliff.

    So BDS (hello, chickens; welcome home!) has finally jumped beyond the uni political ghetto into CA politics. Now Jews almost have a scintilla of actual political opposition to Zionism to justify their constant whingeing about anti-Israel politics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  20. Siege of Jerusalem (1099)
    Jews had fought side-by-side with Muslim soldiers to defend the city, and as the Crusaders breached the outer walls, the Jews of the city retreated to their synagogue to “prepare for death”.[23] According to the Muslim chronicle of Ibn al-Qalanisi, “The Jews assembled in their synagogue, and the Franks burned it over their heads.”[24] However, a contemporary Jewish communication does not corroborate the report that Jews were actually inside of the synagogue when it was set fire.[25] This letter was discovered among the Cairo Geniza collection in 1975 by historian Shelomo Dov Goitein.[26] Historians believe that it was written just two weeks after the siege, making it “the earliest account on the conquest in any language.”[26]

    Read More
    • Replies: @llloyd
    That does remind me of the barn burning story in Poland. A brief forensic examination found in the vicinity of the barn, several human skulls with bullet holes. Then the local Rabbis promptly closed down the examination. It is now illegal in Poland to say hundreds of Jews were burned in the barn, and illegal to say in Israel and everywhere else, they were not. Israel jurisdiction over Holocaust is global. That puts Poland in collision with Israel. Did Fred mention the stereotype about Jews being pushy.? I personally think pushy yes and in this millennium surprisingly ridiculous. The opinion of the Nepali guides could only be personal experience. I recall a Korean business woman whose life was made hell by young Israeli tourists in Auckland. Good cool Israeli back backers I recall also.
    , @Daniil Adamov
    That particular incident actually speaks well of the Jews, don't you think? Regardless of what one thinks of the Crusades themselves. The stereotype in all times is that Jews are unpatriotic and will not fight for the land they live in, but often enough this has turned out to be untrue. This is one such instance, though here it will have been more a matter of practicality.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Svigor says:

    Hippo, isn’t that technically holocaust denial? (thx for the detail, btw)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. rockyroad says:

    There are very rational reasons for criticizing American Jews. Congress has been purchased by Zionists.
    American foreign policy makes no sense except in the context of the Greater Israel Project, which seeks for the US to spend trillions of dollars destroying and dividing ME nations so Israel can easily take over large areas of of other ME nations. The neocons are a nasty piece of work, looking to sow war all over the world, including against Russia, for which they have a special hatred. And almost all major neocons are Jewish, and clearly put Israel over US interests. Would Israel let a much smaller nation dominate its policies?
    American Jews have launched a a massive effort to silence critics of any Israeli policy. They promote the absurd notion that ANY criticism of Israel is just plain anti-Semitism, and they go to great lengths to harass and destroy the careers and reputations of critics of Israel. They aggressively (and successfully) bully universities into silencing people they disagree with, and they get certain professors fired. This is all an attack on the 1st Amendment. So much for the Jewish reputation for love of academics. They have even had goyim pols pass laws to crush dissent about Israel, but at least one court has ruled this unconstitutional. and we hear almost nothing about these issues in the MSM, and yes it is because Jews control the MSM and the entertainment industry (and Big Finance). The molester Weinstein actually had ex-Mossad agents threaten young women who dare speak out. That is simply beyond the pale and unacceptable, yet again we hear nothing about it. And now all Trump’s children have or will marry Jews. So much for America First!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. dearieme says:
    @fnn
    So you're saying the Nepali mountain guides are Hitlerites?

    Literally Hitlerites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Bakerman says:

    Oy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. Jews of course have never been associated with burglary or picking pockets…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. Does Schultz of Starbucks do something evil, or does he, like, you know, sell reasonably good coffee at a reasonable price?

    No he doesn’t. The coffee is lousy, it is overpriced, and the company uses numerous deceptive tax strategies to avoid paying taxes on profits. Is that evil, or not? All a matter of opinion and perspective, I suppose. However, I did not know that Schulz was Jewish until you pointed it out, but it does not surprise me, given his business practices.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    Plus he wants to hire X,000 foreigners. Now THAT's what I call looking out for your fellow Americans.
    , @Max Denken
    What's important about Schultz is not that he's been successful at selling coffee. The important info is that Schultz has leveraged his success at selling coffee to push "refugees" onto his country, to push his baristas to engage customers in a "dialogue about race," to malign white people tired of being robbed of their own country, and to whack Trump at every opportunity he gets. It's not their personality that makes Jews objectionable -- Fred relies too much on a shaky stereotype -- but their racial psychosis that, however understandable (Hitler etc.), is deeply destructive to the white Christian society around them.
    , @Druid
    The coffe is over-roasted and tastes burnt. Horrible. I avoid the place!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. KenH says:

    This explains why Jews do not like Christianity,

    That was in 1099. I could give a F who did what to whom that long ago. But with Jews their motto is “never forgive, never forget”. Even when they’ve lived better in white Christian nations than in any other they still work to undermine the white Christians they live among. That their historical grudges have an endless shelf life is reason to hate them and bar them from living in our nations.

    Importantly, Jewish presence is seen as Jewish conspiracy. Four Jews on the Supreme Court?

    Right. When Jews are overrepresented in any field it’s because they’re so darn smart. It whites are overrepresented in their own friggin countries then Jews lecture us about unearned white privilege. This is why I and a growing number of whites hate them. And it just so happens that all four Jews represent the totalitarian left wing of the court who consistently vote against white American interests. Another reason they’re hated.

    I won’t waste too much time since Fred’s writing philo-semitic propaganda and taking pot shots at anyone who doesn’t think they’re as groovy as he does. This is just one of Freddy’s partisan diatribes similar to how he lionizes and promotes Mexicans and Mexico.

    Anyone who examines the historical record and the history of the Jews in the diaspora with an open mind will become anti-semitic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @prusmc
    Breyer, Bader-Ginzberg and Kagen: whi is r the fourty Jew on Scotus?
    , @johnnyg
    "I could give a F who did what to whom that long ago"

    I assume you mean "I couldn't give a F........." (Nitpicking, I know)
    , @ANON
    You are obviously not "learned in the law" or any kind of lawyer. So where do you get your prejudices from that allows you to say something as ridiculous ss "totalitarian left"?

    Stephen Breyer who is one of the only two SCOTUS judges that I have known personally (the other Scalia J whom you may be surprised to know I met wth Breyer J) is so far from the totalitarian or any left that he is married to a member of the Anglo-Irish aristocrscy whose father was a Tory minister.

    And what deep thoughts can you ptoduce about the total absence of Protestants on the court for many years in a Protestant founded country?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. As Fred hinted, Jews prize their ethnic identity much more than most whites. For example, while Italian and Greek Americans may pay homage to their respective identities, they don’t wear them on their sleeves. They certainly wouldn’t describe an Italian marrying a Greek as “intermarriage,” a few potential exceptions notwithstanding.

    Of course, Jews bragging about their success doesn’t help either. Chinese and other Asian Americans – while not wielding the political and cultural clout of Jews – are also very economically successful; but they at least have the wisdom to keep quiet about it, as evidenced by their strident rejection of the “model minority” stereotype. Successful minorities worldwide such as Bohras in India also manage to quietly enjoy their success; and that’s saying something, given that India is an openly – and often violently – majoritarian country.

    Ultimately, I think that Jews’ chutzpah engenders a lot of ill will. Of all affluent and accomplished minorities, they’re certainly the most flamboyant and pushy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Uncle Remus
    Perhaps you are pointing to one more oddity of the Bay area, Bay Area Guy, but Greeks elsewhere
    in America wear Greekness on their sleeves. Maybe you don't get around much.
    , @White
    There are NOT four Jews one our Supreme Court! Congress ran out the clock on jew Merrick Garland.
    Clinton and Obama appointed 3 jews to follow their progressive agenda; not great legal minds.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. turtle says:

    When a state is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural inertia of such a population will hold the Stage together and maintain its existence through astonishingly long periods of misgovernment and maladministration.
    But the situation is utterly different in a country where the population is not homogeneous….Should the ruling hand show signs of weakness in such a State the result will … be to … awaken the individualistic instincts which are slumbering in the ethnological groups.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Where does this quote originate?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. nsa says:
    @Stealth
    Fred, you know we love most of your columns, but this one is deeply flawed:

    Specifically, Jews are always Them. We are Us.
     
    That's it, huh? Then why did you go on to write the following?

    Anyone who has worked in Washington knows that Jewish control of Congress and the media is near absolute.
     
    That doesn't sound like being hated for the offense of simply being different; that sounds like something that would piss people off.

    They said that Jews (actually Israelis in most cases I think, but the Nepalese do not seem to make the distinction) were loud, demanding, and always trying to force down the guides’ fees.
     
    Implicit in this is that the Nepalese don't dislike most other foreign visitors as much as they do the Israelis. And what had the Israelis done, other than just what the Nepalese guides said? Failed to assimilate into the culture of Nepal while on vacation there? I think your're kind of undermining your central thesis with this one.

    Fred the apologist clearly states the jooies exercise “near absolute control” of Wash DC i.e. the goy 98% of the US population has essentially been disenfranchised. That’s not a reason to hate on the vile conniving jooies?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. KenH says:

    Hitler’s complaints against the Jews were along usual lines, that Jews controlled German culture, finance, academia, and the media.

    This sentence is written as if Hitler’s claims are self evidently false and he was just a mindless Jew hater. Jews were also way overrepresented as communist agitators. Again, examine the historical record instead of the usual propaganda and prevarications of appointed court historians.

    Four Jews on the Supreme Court? From two percent of the population?

    They are 2% of the general population but 44% of the SCOTUS. How many Palestinian Muslims and Christians are on the Israeli supreme court if Jews are so committed to diversity like they claim in the diaspora?

    Read More
    • Replies: @MEFOBILLS
    Germans had legitimate grievances against the Jews.

    The Balfour document was called "stabbing in the back" by Germans. Germany had welcomed Jews into her economy more than any country up to that time.

    Germany had actually Won WW1, and Jews had maneuvered America to enter the war, so Zion could have Balfour.

    There was a preponderance of Jews at Versailles, and German's were humiliated by being made to stand, then there was additional debt humiliations and stripping of German lands and industry.

    Then interwar years of debt leads directly to hyperinflation. Then Germany discovers during the hyperinflation that much of Germany had been bought up. Jews borrowed dollars from the friends in money centers such as london and wall street, and bought up Germany on the cheap.

    As late as 38 up to 1/3 of Germany was still under Jewish economic control.

    In other words, Jews backstabbed Germany, then helped cause Versailled conditions, then bought up the country during hyperinflation they helped start.

    Then to make it worse, Zion declared war on Germany in 33, which was an attempt to starve Germany out. Germany was not food independent in those years.

    Basically Jewish behavior was disgusting, murderous, and "grabbing." You know if it is good for the tribe, then anything goes.

    Anti-semitism is a learned response. Anybody that sufficiently understands economics and economic history comes away with the understanding that throughout history, Jews have used usury to get over on others.

    Even the original Magna Carta was about Jews putting house to house in debt claims.

    Burning of Jewish homes was a Jubilee, because that is where the debts were stored.

    Nowadays, there is no way to Jubilee and get away from their usury magick game. If Jews don't straighten up and fly right, then the world will vomit them out again, as individual countries have done some 160 times in the past.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Also, are you sure that there are four Jewish Supreme Court justices? I believe that only three – Breyer, Ginsburg, and Kagan – are Jewish.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    • Replies: @gsjackson
    I believe Sotomayor is half Jewish.
    , @Flip
    There are three. Garland would have been the fourth (and then kiss Heller goodbye). Senator McConnell saved gun rights in America.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. turtle says:

    Stereotypes come from somewhere.
    I have a friend who is prejudiced against Chinese people, based on his dealings with Chinese in the computer industry. His perception (right or wrong, but it is the perception which matters) is that they were “sneaky,” “underhanded,” they “stuck together against the round eyes.”
    Yet, as a school teacher, this same fellow readily bragged up the achievements of his numerous Oriental students. Which tells me that, on a personal level, prejudice can be overcome. As the saying went, back in the days of hippies vs. rednecks, “Bar stool to bar stool, things can be pretty cozy.”
    My friend is a devout evangelical Christian. Whenever I see the “fish” symbol, I tend to run the other way. But, I make an exception in his case, because I know him to be, and respect him as, a good man.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    What "prejudice" did he overcome? He had specific, direct experience of some Chinese in his professional life. From what you say about the man his conclusions are almost certainly correct about the people he met. Yet you imply that he was prejudiced there but "overcame" his intellectual deficiencies as a teacher and the time got it right.
    , @Antlitz Grollheim
    Sounds like he likes Chinese individuals, feels alien among groups of Chinese, a sentiment I share.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. It is hard to tell because disliking Jews is often a firing offense, and a controlled press makes discussion impossible.

    Why?? Therein lies the answer as to why Jews are resented and disliked.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. Worse–and this has caused millions of deaths–Jews are often successful. It doesn’t matter whether the success arises from superior intelligence, greater drive, collusion, or the will of Yahweh. It happens.

    Hard to know where to begin to correct Reed’s misstatements, but Andrew Joyce offers a pretty comprehensive look at the question –

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    WWIII...???
    "The country that will have made it possible... is Israel." Col. Larry Wilkerson
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzPL6eGZktQ
    Is the US Ramping Up Its Military Presence in Syria and Planning to Attack Iran for Israel?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. polaco says:
    @Robert Magill

    Hitler’s complaints against the Jews were along usual lines, that Jews controlled German culture, finance, academia, and the media.
     

    Hatred of Jews may have ranked much lower with Hitler and the top Nazis than did making them and other groups targets for political gain.

     Note that while Americans think of the Holocaust as something the Germans did (I do) to Jews it can look like just another attack by a Christian country (Poland, Russia, England, the Baltics, and so on.)
     

     
    Israel Shamir, who comments here (a Jew in a former incarnation) would strongly protest including Russia in this indictment

    https://robertmagill.wordpress.com/2017/12/15/hark-what-voice-is-that-its-silence/

    The 1918 communist revolution in Germany, which nearly succeeded, was backed by the Soviets. The German people were aware of the Jews’ prominent role in it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    Indeed, Adolph Hitler was very much aware that the same Jewish-led Communist revolution that succeeded in Russia, and which nearly succeeded in Germany, is what led to an undefeated Germany being forced to capitulate to the Allies in 1918. The truth surrounding this and other aspects of European history is out there and written down, but buried so deep it's nearly impossible to find.
    , @jacques sheete

    The 1918 communist revolution in Germany, which nearly succeeded, was backed by the Soviets. The German people were aware of the Jews’ prominent role in it.
     
    True. The Reds, (as Sutton tells us), were financed by Wall Street and were raising hell in Germany and elsewhere, having advocating permanent world wide revolution.

    They even proclaimed a "Bavarian Soviet Republic."

    Note to Freddy: Munich is in Bavaria, though I highly doubt that rings any bells for you.

    Before you bloviate further on subjects you obviously know nothing about, kindly read Sutton's series, and Douglas Reed's, "The Controversy of Zion," https://archive.org/stream/TheControversyOfZion/TheControversyOfZion_djvu.txt

    , @my2cents
    What 1918 communist revolution in Germany???? The war was started by Britain/France with US support. When Germany was winning it was Chaim Weizmann who told Balfour he could get Americans involved and win the war IF Balfour would provide a Homeland for the Jews. So on Nov.2, 1917 the Balfour Proclamation deeded other people's land over which they had NO control (it was sill under the Ottomans) to another group f people who had NO genetic right to it. It was that "stab in the back" Hitler referred to. The Versailles Treaty broke up Germany and ordered such unbelievable restitutions that the Germans were starving......which then led to Hitler.....as soon as he was elected/appointed International Jewry declared war on Germany an did so again in 1938.

    Since 1870 Britain/France and the U.S have been hard at work to break up Germany....It had become the biggest economy after the U.S and that was a huge threat to Britain/France and the U.S.
    It is still the reason why Germany has been occupied by the U.S since 1945.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. gsjackson says:
    @Bay Area Guy
    Also, are you sure that there are four Jewish Supreme Court justices? I believe that only three - Breyer, Ginsburg, and Kagan - are Jewish.

    I believe Sotomayor is half Jewish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Paul Yarbles
    Sotomayor is not Jewish. Not at all. Sotomayor is a lesbian, but not a Jewish lesbian. Unlike Kagan who is a Jewish lesbian. And unlike Ginsburg who is a Jewish-heterosexual.

    Two-thirds of the women of the supreme court are lesbians. Two-ninths of the supreme court are homosexuals. Now that's over-representation!

    All the Jews and lesbians are leftists though.
    , @Uncle Remus
    Many commentators, including Jewish ones, speculate that Justice Sotomayor, a Bronx Puerto Rican,
    is in fact a descendant of Spanish conversos (aka Maranos), Jews who outwardly converted to satisfy
    Ferdinand and Isabella but continued to practice the Jewish religion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. gsjackson says:

    “Jews have never been associated with burglary or pick pocketing?” Probably would come as a surprise to Charles Dickens — see Oliver Twist: Fagin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Yes, I thought of that immediately. Fagin, though, didn't pick pockets himself. He taught orphan children to pick pockets and give him the goods they stole in return for giving them a home and feeding them. That is the practice that Dickens pointed out as being abhorrent, controlling people and influencing them to commit crimes for his benefit.

    That was the practice that Jewish pawnbrokers were always suspected of, and it was usually a correct suspicion. Paying thieves a pittance for stolen goods, under the guise of making them a loan which they never intended to repay and then taking the stolen goods as forfeited collateral was part of the pawnbrokers' practice. The other part was usury.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. turtle says:

    Gypped you out of your house?

    “Gypped” is offensive to Romani.

    Me. personally? No.
    But ask yourself, who profited mightily from the so-called “housing bubble” and the subsequent crash?
    Which firms, exactly, were “too big to fail,” and were recipients of U. S. Gov’t largesse at the expense of we, the taxpayers?

    What you refer to as “Middle Eastern” characteristics I like to call the “rug merchant mentality.”
    I once worked for a Yugoslavian who had it bad. My working hypothesis is that it is characteristic of those whose ancestors came from somewhere around the Mediterranean, or along the trade routes to Asia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    Fred apparently slept through Bible class, but the New Testament refers to it as devouring widow's houses.

    Matthew 23:14
    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."

    Also, there's the paraphrased quote from the Godfather Movie; "men in suits and ties make better bank robbers than men with guns."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. turtle says:

    Hitler’s complaints against the Jews were along usual lines, that Jews controlled German culture, finance, academia, and the media.

    Not exactly.
    In his own words:

    There were few Jews in Linz.
    As I thought they were persecuted on account of their Faith my aversion to hearing remarks against them grew almost into a feeling of abhorrence.
    Then I came to Vienna.
    In the Jew I still saw only a man who was of a different religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, I was against the idea that he should be attacked because he had a different faith.
    Once, when passing through the inner City [Vienna], I suddenly encountered a phenomenon in a long caftan and wearing black side-locks. My first thought was: Is this a Jew? They certainly did not have this appearance in Linz.
    Cleanliness, whether moral or of another kind, had its own peculiar meaning for these people.
    What soon gave me cause for very serious consideration were the activities of the Jews in certain branches of life….Was there any shady undertaking, any form of foulness, especially in cultural life, in which at least one Jew did not participate?
    The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one percent of the nation – that fact could not be gainsaid.

    In summary, Hitler states that his antipathy towards Jews, as a group, was based on his experiences in the “big city” (Vienna), and his *perception* that the Jews he encountered there were mostly immoral and corrupt, unlike those he had known in his (smaller) home town.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous
    More of the past? Nope. It is just a question of how many goyim will be nuked.

    “It is just a question of how many goyim will be nuked.”

    Not that many, if you are honest.

    “People don’t like Jews because Jews don’t practice the Golden Rule of treating others as they would like to be treated themselves.”

    Some people, absolutely.

    And, of course Fred is not completely accurate when he said that “Jews do not assimilate”.

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/are-us-jews-assimilating-out-of-existence

    “David Goldman–Sadly, American Jews stand out as a horrible example of demographic failure. In the United States, secular and loosely affiliated American Jews, that is, the vast majority, have the lowest fertility rate of any identifiable segment of the American population. As I wrote in my book How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too):

    Nowhere is the fertility gap between religious and non-religious more extreme than among American Jews. As a group, American Jews show the lowest fertility of any ethnic group in the country. That is a matter of great anguish for Jewish community leaders. According to sociologist Steven Cohen, “We are now in the midst of a non-Orthodox Jewish population meltdown. … Among Jews in their 50s, for every 100 Orthodox adults, we have 192 Orthodox children. And for the non-Orthodox, for every 100 adults, we have merely 55 such children.”

    Half of the non-Orthodox children, moreover, marry non-Jews, and very few children of mixed marriages will remain Jewish. As Reform Rabbi Lance J Sussman wrote in 2010, “With the exception of a number of Orthodox communities and a few other bright spots in or just off the mainstream of Jewish religious life, American Judaism is in precipitous decline … the Reform movement has probably contracted by a full third in the last ten years!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. llloyd says: • Website
    @Hippopotamusdrome


    Siege of Jerusalem (1099)
    Jews had fought side-by-side with Muslim soldiers to defend the city, and as the Crusaders breached the outer walls, the Jews of the city retreated to their synagogue to "prepare for death".[23] According to the Muslim chronicle of Ibn al-Qalanisi, "The Jews assembled in their synagogue, and the Franks burned it over their heads."[24] However, a contemporary Jewish communication does not corroborate the report that Jews were actually inside of the synagogue when it was set fire.[25] This letter was discovered among the Cairo Geniza collection in 1975 by historian Shelomo Dov Goitein.[26] Historians believe that it was written just two weeks after the siege, making it "the earliest account on the conquest in any language."[26]

     

    That does remind me of the barn burning story in Poland. A brief forensic examination found in the vicinity of the barn, several human skulls with bullet holes. Then the local Rabbis promptly closed down the examination. It is now illegal in Poland to say hundreds of Jews were burned in the barn, and illegal to say in Israel and everywhere else, they were not. Israel jurisdiction over Holocaust is global. That puts Poland in collision with Israel. Did Fred mention the stereotype about Jews being pushy.? I personally think pushy yes and in this millennium surprisingly ridiculous. The opinion of the Nepali guides could only be personal experience. I recall a Korean business woman whose life was made hell by young Israeli tourists in Auckland. Good cool Israeli back backers I recall also.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniil Adamov
    Everywhere else?! Surely legal in the US, at least; the one good thing to be said for America is that they do not have those asinine Holocaust denial laws there yet.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. turtle says:

    As I understand it, Zionism got its main initial impetus from this book:

    http://www.mideastweb.org/jewishstate.pdf

    which in turn was inspired, if that is the word, by the trial of Captain Alfred Dreyfus of the French Army, in which Capt Dreyfus was unjustly convicted of espionage.
    From the preface:

    In 1902, he [Herzl] published a utopian novel about the Jewish state, Altneuad (oldnew
    land) a vision complete with monorails and modern industry. , Altneuad
    envisioned a multipluralistic Democracy in which Arabs and Jews had equal
    rights.

    Doesn’t seem to have worked out that way.
    The central premise of Zionism seems to be that Jews cannot expect equable treatment in a majority Gentile society. Ironically, the infamous case which inspired it also disproves this hypothesis.
    To wit:
    In the long run, justice was done in the case of Capt. Dreyfus.
    He was very publicly restored to rank, with a promotion, in the French Army, and served honorably in what was then known as the Great War, which was all he ever wanted to do in the first place.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Dreyfus

    On 12 July 1906, Dreyfus was officially exonerated by a military commission. The day after his exoneration, he was readmitted into the army with a promotion to the rank of major (Chef d’Escadron). A week later, he was made Knight of the Legion of Honour,[6] and subsequently assigned to command an artillery unit at Vincennes.

    Of course, there are (particularly) Jews who will say, “But he had years of his life stolen from him.” This is, of course, true, but in the long run it is nothing more, nor less, than another miscarriage of justice, which in the case was, fortunately for its victim, eventually corrected. It is, in that sense, not unique. It did result in an an outcome more favorable than some both before and since.

    Read More
    • Replies: @llloyd
    The German Embassy never denied that Dreyfus was sending classified French military documents to them. The German Government had a gentleman's policy of not lying to foreign Governments. The actual evidence against Dreyfus was strong and he was never cleared by a military Court during his imprisonment only pardoned. The case split France into Clerical and anti Clerical parties. You might call it the birther case of its day. The actual evidence had nothing to do with the politics.
    , @Hippopotamusdrome
    Dreyfus affair was a hoax.

    The Dreyfus Affair on Trial
    , @ploni almoni
    And what if the Dreyfus case was a controlled psy-op to disestablish the Catholic Church and promote Zionism, and Dreyfus never went to Devil's Island? What if Marr, Herzl, and Zola were simply hired propagandists?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. RobinG says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Worse–and this has caused millions of deaths–Jews are often successful. It doesn’t matter whether the success arises from superior intelligence, greater drive, collusion, or the will of Yahweh. It happens.
     
    Hard to know where to begin to correct Reed's misstatements, but Andrew Joyce offers a pretty comprehensive look at the question --

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqbmhgbIU7c

    WWIII…???
    “The country that will have made it possible… is Israel.” Col. Larry Wilkerson

    Is the US Ramping Up Its Military Presence in Syria and Planning to Attack Iran for Israel?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Ace says:
    @lavoisier
    Animus goes much deeper than simple resentment at Jewish success.

    It is because of the destruction of our once stable society and the implosion of Western European nations under cultural currents unleased by the Jews that is the source of that animus.

    Speak honestly Fred and stop the tangential and mealy mouthed explanations for the animus.

    It isn’t just cultural currents unleashed; it’s deliberate destruction planned by institutional Jewry. Barbara Specter’s married to the chief rabbi of Sweden and says Europe’s “too monolithic,” meaning “too white.” She says Jews will be resented for their leading role in making Europe multicultural, i.e., non-white majority. Right you are, Barbara.

    1,200+ rabbis in the U.S. came out for unchecked immigration of “refugees” and Adelson, Saban, Gelbaum, the ADL, the AJC, the HIAS, and BB are all for open borders. And the utter destruction of white America.

    Jews played a huge role in Bolshevism, in putsches in Hungary, Austria, and Germany, and in Holodomor. “Jew” and “communist” were practically synonymous in 1930s America and Israel ran Pollard, one of the most destructive spies ever known in America. Jews have also done their utmost to push the most destructive aspects of the civil rights disaster.

    Israel went to war against the U.S. with its deliberate attack on the USS Liberty with machine gunning of our sailors trying to make it into the lifeboats. It’s protestations of “mistake” were transparent lies.

    AIPAC ensures that billions from the treasury are squandered every year on an enemy nation that tries to involve us in fighting their wars for local hegemony. Is greater Israel also one of our projects?

    Finally, institutional Jewry does everything in its power to distort National Socialism as “right-wing” to deflect attention from the leftist essence of totalitarian destruction, torture, theft, and murder and the disproportionate Jewish role in extreme leftist movements. The Jewish obsession with “The” Holocaust is the ultimate “holocaust denial.” And woe betide he who cares to point that out. “The” Holocaust pales in comparison to the communist ones? Hater!!

    What is not to loathe in organized Jewry?

    I know of decent, patriotic Jews but I know of few Jews who dare to speak out against what I have mentioned. I would be attacked for “anti-Semitism” long before such voices are heard.

    Fred us always a great read and a personal hero of mine. However, he missed the target here with his discussion of a bland “otherness.” Reading excerpts from the Talmud and quotes from the great Rabbi Schneerson reveals that there is indeed some virulent Jewish hatred of the goyim out there. Bland otherness is not what I’m picking up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. Ace says:
    @Jonathan Mason

    Does Schultz of Starbucks do something evil, or does he, like, you know, sell reasonably good coffee at a reasonable price?
     
    No he doesn't. The coffee is lousy, it is overpriced, and the company uses numerous deceptive tax strategies to avoid paying taxes on profits. Is that evil, or not? All a matter of opinion and perspective, I suppose. However, I did not know that Schulz was Jewish until you pointed it out, but it does not surprise me, given his business practices.

    Plus he wants to hire X,000 foreigners. Now THAT’s what I call looking out for your fellow Americans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. turtle says:

    To expound further on the (false) premise of Zionism:
    Syllogism goes like this:
    Major premise (A): Alfred Dreyfus got the shaft.
    Yep. Few, if any, would disagree with that.
    Minor premise (B): Capt. Dreyfus got screwed specifically and exclusively because he was a member of the Jewish tribe.
    Could be debated, but we will assume its truth for purpose of this discussion.
    Conclusion (C): No Jew can get a fair trial in a Gentile court of law.

    As any student of logic will recognize, C is a textbook example of generalizing from a specific.
    As such, it is logically indefensible, and requires only one counter example to disprove the conclusion.
    In this case, one counter example is provided by the very case which inspired it.
    Ergo, A + B does not imply C.
    Or, in other words, Zionism is a house of cards.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  48. Ace says:
    @turtle
    Stereotypes come from somewhere.
    I have a friend who is prejudiced against Chinese people, based on his dealings with Chinese in the computer industry. His perception (right or wrong, but it is the perception which matters) is that they were "sneaky," "underhanded," they "stuck together against the round eyes."
    Yet, as a school teacher, this same fellow readily bragged up the achievements of his numerous Oriental students. Which tells me that, on a personal level, prejudice can be overcome. As the saying went, back in the days of hippies vs. rednecks, "Bar stool to bar stool, things can be pretty cozy."
    My friend is a devout evangelical Christian. Whenever I see the "fish" symbol, I tend to run the other way. But, I make an exception in his case, because I know him to be, and respect him as, a good man.

    What “prejudice” did he overcome? He had specific, direct experience of some Chinese in his professional life. From what you say about the man his conclusions are almost certainly correct about the people he met. Yet you imply that he was prejudiced there but “overcame” his intellectual deficiencies as a teacher and the time got it right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @turtle
    @ Ace
    You are quite right. His experience led to prejudice.
    As I said, "stereotypes come from somewhere."
    Herr Hitler said the same thing.
    If all, or even most, of the Jews he met in Vienna had been like the nice Jewish folks he knew back home in Linz, there would have been no problem, at least in his mind.

    I myself harbor prejudice against evangelical Christians, at least in a business setting, again based on experience. I like to think of this as, "Batter up. Count is 0 and 1 (or 0 and 2, as the case may be).

    But, I also say that, on a case by case basis, prejudice can be overcome by those who are made to suffer for the sins of their fellows. In other words, "Prove to me you are not like them."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. What a superficial and unoriginal analysis. Why did Fred even bother?

    Since I presume Fred has read articles here on UNZ by astute iconoclasts such as Giraldi, MacDonald and Israel Shamir, he should be more acquainted with the hidden vagaries of this complex subject. But no. Fred dishes up instead a grab-bag of cliches, tropes and stereotypes. Ho hum.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. @Hippopotamusdrome


    Siege of Jerusalem (1099)
    Jews had fought side-by-side with Muslim soldiers to defend the city, and as the Crusaders breached the outer walls, the Jews of the city retreated to their synagogue to "prepare for death".[23] According to the Muslim chronicle of Ibn al-Qalanisi, "The Jews assembled in their synagogue, and the Franks burned it over their heads."[24] However, a contemporary Jewish communication does not corroborate the report that Jews were actually inside of the synagogue when it was set fire.[25] This letter was discovered among the Cairo Geniza collection in 1975 by historian Shelomo Dov Goitein.[26] Historians believe that it was written just two weeks after the siege, making it "the earliest account on the conquest in any language."[26]

     

    That particular incident actually speaks well of the Jews, don’t you think? Regardless of what one thinks of the Crusades themselves. The stereotype in all times is that Jews are unpatriotic and will not fight for the land they live in, but often enough this has turned out to be untrue. This is one such instance, though here it will have been more a matter of practicality.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @llloyd
    That does remind me of the barn burning story in Poland. A brief forensic examination found in the vicinity of the barn, several human skulls with bullet holes. Then the local Rabbis promptly closed down the examination. It is now illegal in Poland to say hundreds of Jews were burned in the barn, and illegal to say in Israel and everywhere else, they were not. Israel jurisdiction over Holocaust is global. That puts Poland in collision with Israel. Did Fred mention the stereotype about Jews being pushy.? I personally think pushy yes and in this millennium surprisingly ridiculous. The opinion of the Nepali guides could only be personal experience. I recall a Korean business woman whose life was made hell by young Israeli tourists in Auckland. Good cool Israeli back backers I recall also.

    Everywhere else?! Surely legal in the US, at least; the one good thing to be said for America is that they do not have those asinine Holocaust denial laws there yet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    Rest assured, that if not for the Constitution and the 1st Amendment, Jews in America would have, long ago enacted laws making holocaust denial a punishable crime.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. anon • Disclaimer says:

    “It is human nature to dislike people different from oneself. This runs against today’s cult of diversity”.

    Which of course explains why Jews invented the ‘cult of diversity’, political correctness and cultural Marxism, with their control of the media, Hollywood and academia and pushed for the disastrous 1965 immigration act. It served their interests.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. llloyd says: • Website

    I phrased it badly. I mean that the Israel law forbidding Holocaust denial applies to the whole world. That is really quite unique. I don’t think the Israel Holocaust denial law has ever been implemented through Court process. In Israel you would be made mince of. I do know a New Zealander Joel Hayward in the 1990s was planning a holiday in Israel. He received a letter from the Israel Embassy warning him that if he arrived in Israel, he would be arrested for Holocaust Denial in his New Zealand academic thesis. Israel does not recognise borders.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. llloyd says: • Website
    @turtle
    As I understand it, Zionism got its main initial impetus from this book:
    http://www.mideastweb.org/jewishstate.pdf
    which in turn was inspired, if that is the word, by the trial of Captain Alfred Dreyfus of the French Army, in which Capt Dreyfus was unjustly convicted of espionage.
    From the preface:

    In 1902, he [Herzl] published a utopian novel about the Jewish state, Altneuad (oldnew
    land) a vision complete with monorails and modern industry. , Altneuad
    envisioned a multipluralistic Democracy in which Arabs and Jews had equal
    rights.
     
    Doesn't seem to have worked out that way.
    The central premise of Zionism seems to be that Jews cannot expect equable treatment in a majority Gentile society. Ironically, the infamous case which inspired it also disproves this hypothesis.
    To wit:
    In the long run, justice was done in the case of Capt. Dreyfus.
    He was very publicly restored to rank, with a promotion, in the French Army, and served honorably in what was then known as the Great War, which was all he ever wanted to do in the first place.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Dreyfus

    On 12 July 1906, Dreyfus was officially exonerated by a military commission. The day after his exoneration, he was readmitted into the army with a promotion to the rank of major (Chef d'Escadron). A week later, he was made Knight of the Legion of Honour,[6] and subsequently assigned to command an artillery unit at Vincennes.
     
    Of course, there are (particularly) Jews who will say, "But he had years of his life stolen from him." This is, of course, true, but in the long run it is nothing more, nor less, than another miscarriage of justice, which in the case was, fortunately for its victim, eventually corrected. It is, in that sense, not unique. It did result in an an outcome more favorable than some both before and since.

    The German Embassy never denied that Dreyfus was sending classified French military documents to them. The German Government had a gentleman’s policy of not lying to foreign Governments. The actual evidence against Dreyfus was strong and he was never cleared by a military Court during his imprisonment only pardoned. The case split France into Clerical and anti Clerical parties. You might call it the birther case of its day. The actual evidence had nothing to do with the politics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Maybe being 230 TRILLION in debt to them, while getting fleeced with inflations and deflations has something to do with the ‘irrational’, ‘visceral’ hate against Jews?

    Usury is a mortal sin, and the entire World is built on it.

    The Jews own the Banks, and thus everything, and everybody.

    Usury is total parasitical. The Money Lender creates nothing, and usurps everything.

    Usury is the cause of all the inequality, the poverty, the premature death of the multitude.

    What’s not to hate?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
    “Many people resist acknowledging reality only because they would collapse (disintegrate) if they acknowledged and accepted it.” Goethe
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Otto Zeit says:

    “This [the 1099 synagogue burning] explains why Jews do not like Christianity…”

    No it doesn’t. The explanation for that animosity goes back to the moment Christianity began to exist – before that, even – it was inherent in Jesus’s claim to Messiaship that the entire structure of power and authority in the Jewish community was to be transformed. If Jesus was indeed the Christ, the God-sent ruler of the Jews and the world, then the rabbinical system of governing Jewish life was no longer relevant, and the power and prestige of the rabbinate was as good as gone with the wind.

    Making that claim is what got Jesus arrested, and ultimately killed; preaching it is what got his followers persecuted. The antagonism was instantaneous, and soon turned murderous, beginning with deacon Stephen.

    This is the pattern that has established itself from the beginning – when the Jews held the upper hand of power (under the shield of the Pax Romana), they went after the Christians; when the Christians gained the upper hand (by converting the whole culture), they returned the favor.

    I’m sure you can supply your own spin on the current version of that cycle.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  57. Renoman says:

    What’s to like? Let’s make a list.
    Sure is a thin book!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  58. j says: • Website

    Should America fall into an Unstable Epoch, the situation of American Jews will be uncomfortable. But America, like all AngoSaxon countries, is very stable. In the long term, their fate will be like the Russian Jews: One third will assimilate, one third will leave for Israel and other countries, and one third will disappear, in this case, because of their extremely low fertility.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Otto Zeit
    You may want to re-calculate that assessment.
    https://eand.co/why-were-underestimating-american-collapse-be04d9e55235
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @turtle
    As I understand it, Zionism got its main initial impetus from this book:
    http://www.mideastweb.org/jewishstate.pdf
    which in turn was inspired, if that is the word, by the trial of Captain Alfred Dreyfus of the French Army, in which Capt Dreyfus was unjustly convicted of espionage.
    From the preface:

    In 1902, he [Herzl] published a utopian novel about the Jewish state, Altneuad (oldnew
    land) a vision complete with monorails and modern industry. , Altneuad
    envisioned a multipluralistic Democracy in which Arabs and Jews had equal
    rights.
     
    Doesn't seem to have worked out that way.
    The central premise of Zionism seems to be that Jews cannot expect equable treatment in a majority Gentile society. Ironically, the infamous case which inspired it also disproves this hypothesis.
    To wit:
    In the long run, justice was done in the case of Capt. Dreyfus.
    He was very publicly restored to rank, with a promotion, in the French Army, and served honorably in what was then known as the Great War, which was all he ever wanted to do in the first place.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Dreyfus

    On 12 July 1906, Dreyfus was officially exonerated by a military commission. The day after his exoneration, he was readmitted into the army with a promotion to the rank of major (Chef d'Escadron). A week later, he was made Knight of the Legion of Honour,[6] and subsequently assigned to command an artillery unit at Vincennes.
     
    Of course, there are (particularly) Jews who will say, "But he had years of his life stolen from him." This is, of course, true, but in the long run it is nothing more, nor less, than another miscarriage of justice, which in the case was, fortunately for its victim, eventually corrected. It is, in that sense, not unique. It did result in an an outcome more favorable than some both before and since.

    Dreyfus affair was a hoax.

    The Dreyfus Affair on Trial

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Singh says:

    As long as jews consider everyone else goyim Cattle then everyone else is fine to retaliate. Same as the christian heathen muslim infidel complex।।

    People with such notions are not human.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾ।।ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ।।

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
    Singh tries to roar like a lion
    Confusedly babbling of Zion.
    What's English: Impure.
    What's Sanskrit: Obscure.
    But at least we can blame him for tryin'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. freebird says:

    Possibly some of the hostility is of a sheer political nature. For example it seems to me as an average white non-Jew American on main-street that is also a deplorable that some of the most virulent non-stop hate of our president and his supporters comes from Jews in the media, in Hollywood, and in other high-level positions of power in government and industry. There is nothing wrong with the criticism in a free democracy, but it can lead to backlash and hostility by people with an alternative viewpoint. I think it would be fair to say that a majority of American Jews are pretty far left in their political leanings. And with that ideology comes a certain arrogant attitude against the people in fly-over country that have a different viewpoint about cultural and social issues. The number of Jewish intellectuals in America today can be counted on one hand. While the ones in academia, in the media, in finance, and government is out of proportion to their representation in the entire body politic. And it is fair to say as already stated that a majority of American Jews even those that profess to be on the right hate our president and his supporters with a pathology that is not commensurate with common-sense. Possibly you should delve into that aspect of what is going on and then enlighten Trump supporters about what you come up with.

    Read More
    • Agree: Carroll Price
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  62. ronhan says:

    Well, that was the simplistic version of reality I have come to expect from Mr. Reed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. ronhan says:
    @fnn
    So you're saying the Nepali mountain guides are Hitlerites?

    Sounds like most of the world are hitlerites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. @polaco
    The 1918 communist revolution in Germany, which nearly succeeded, was backed by the Soviets. The German people were aware of the Jews' prominent role in it.

    Indeed, Adolph Hitler was very much aware that the same Jewish-led Communist revolution that succeeded in Russia, and which nearly succeeded in Germany, is what led to an undefeated Germany being forced to capitulate to the Allies in 1918. The truth surrounding this and other aspects of European history is out there and written down, but buried so deep it’s nearly impossible to find.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. turtle says:
    @Ace
    What "prejudice" did he overcome? He had specific, direct experience of some Chinese in his professional life. From what you say about the man his conclusions are almost certainly correct about the people he met. Yet you imply that he was prejudiced there but "overcame" his intellectual deficiencies as a teacher and the time got it right.

    @ Ace
    You are quite right. His experience led to prejudice.
    As I said, “stereotypes come from somewhere.”
    Herr Hitler said the same thing.
    If all, or even most, of the Jews he met in Vienna had been like the nice Jewish folks he knew back home in Linz, there would have been no problem, at least in his mind.

    I myself harbor prejudice against evangelical Christians, at least in a business setting, again based on experience. I like to think of this as, “Batter up. Count is 0 and 1 (or 0 and 2, as the case may be).

    But, I also say that, on a case by case basis, prejudice can be overcome by those who are made to suffer for the sins of their fellows. In other words, “Prove to me you are not like them.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @nsa
    When dealing with chrissies and jooies.......better get it in writing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @turtle

    Gypped you out of your house?
     
    "Gypped" is offensive to Romani.

    Me. personally? No.
    But ask yourself, who profited mightily from the so-called "housing bubble" and the subsequent crash?
    Which firms, exactly, were "too big to fail," and were recipients of U. S. Gov't largesse at the expense of we, the taxpayers?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnE5zvosplc

    What you refer to as "Middle Eastern" characteristics I like to call the "rug merchant mentality."
    I once worked for a Yugoslavian who had it bad. My working hypothesis is that it is characteristic of those whose ancestors came from somewhere around the Mediterranean, or along the trade routes to Asia.

    Fred apparently slept through Bible class, but the New Testament refers to it as devouring widow’s houses.

    Matthew 23:14
    “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.”

    Also, there’s the paraphrased quote from the Godfather Movie; “men in suits and ties make better bank robbers than men with guns.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @turtle
    I'll have to remember that citation from Matthew.
    My evangelical Christian friend who dislikes Chinese is a Mischling whose Jewish father went to prison for defrauding widows and orphans. In this case, the son is very much *NOT* like the father, and it makes me sad that he grew up with such a poor role model. He is in fact a very selfless person, who may very well die poor, because money means very little to him.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Daniil Adamov
    Everywhere else?! Surely legal in the US, at least; the one good thing to be said for America is that they do not have those asinine Holocaust denial laws there yet.

    Rest assured, that if not for the Constitution and the 1st Amendment, Jews in America would have, long ago enacted laws making holocaust denial a punishable crime.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Truth says:

    Hey Federico, what did Bibi have for dinner last night?

    From where you had your nose when you wrote this article you should be able to tell.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  69. Every part of a Boeing 787 is designed to be as light as can possibly be made.
    Therefore a Boeing 787 is a light object.

    Fred, paraphrased;

    “no one Jew whom I have met has done me any irremedial harm
    therefore Jews as a whole do no harm.”

    As you can see, fallacy of composition.

    While it may be the case that no one Jew that Fred (or I) have met has done me irrevocable harm, this does not allow one to draw the conclusion that Jews as a whole have not harmed American society as a whole.

    We’ve just been through the literal destruction of our once-sound banking system, carried out largely by Jewish dominated investment banks. These investment banks bought over 50% of the largest single debt pool in the world, the United States mortgage market, with borrowed, fictional money, created ex nihilo at 200:1 leverage rates by the likes of Jewish owned Lehman Bros. The Jewish dominated Federal Reserve was complicit in this marauding rampage. Jews lobbied for loosening the sound, time-tested restrictions that had hitherto restrained speculative excesses. And Fred has the nerve to claim that Jews have done no harm????

    Short selling artificially increases the number of shares of any stock thereby “inflating” it’s value i.e. devaluing existing shares held by real shareholders. Using this mechanism, Jew Soros drove down the value of English pound which hurt many people, especially those whose life savings are in vehicles tied to the value of their nation’s currency. How can this not be harm?

    What I hear Jews say all the time is this, “It’s okay for me and my people, acting in concert, to drive you and your people to economic ruin, destroy your home and family, but if, in response, you so much as touch a hair on my head, I will sue your socks off.”

    So it’s okay to harm outsiders through manipulative shenanigans but if they respond with physical behavior, then they will be further stripped of whatever little they have left.

    It is this, leaving people with no options, which makes nonJews despise Jews. First the goy are fleeced; then when they lash out, they are stomped on by the Jewish lawyers and judges who dominate our legal system and their hired-thug goons.

    Fred, go fly a kite.

    Read More
    • Agree: Carroll Price
    • Replies: @DaveE
    Well said, but you left out the parts about Jewish-done attacks of 9/11, the ensuing wars we're been backed into for Israel, and come to think of it, all the other Jewish-done false-flag terror attacks designed to terrify and disarm us. And many other diabolical stunts, done through our Jew-infested "Intelligence" agencies, too numerous to count at this point.

    Jews are all the proof you need that Organized Crime does indeed pay VERY well.

    Jews are the oldest, largest, cleverest and most vicious ethnic Mafia the world has ever seen. The Sicilians were Cub Scouts in comparison.

    And yes, this piece brought down Fred's semester GPA considerably.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. turtle says:
    @Carroll Price
    Fred apparently slept through Bible class, but the New Testament refers to it as devouring widow's houses.

    Matthew 23:14
    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."

    Also, there's the paraphrased quote from the Godfather Movie; "men in suits and ties make better bank robbers than men with guns."

    I’ll have to remember that citation from Matthew.
    My evangelical Christian friend who dislikes Chinese is a Mischling whose Jewish father went to prison for defrauding widows and orphans. In this case, the son is very much *NOT* like the father, and it makes me sad that he grew up with such a poor role model. He is in fact a very selfless person, who may very well die poor, because money means very little to him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
    Excellent illustration that: “We Jews are just like everyone else, only more so.”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. I thought Mr. Reed provided a good summary of the situation. The diversity of responses suggests that he struck a nice balance in presenting his observations.

    I am a mixed-ethnicity Roman Catholic but starting with college and ever since, most of my closest associates and many of those with whom I work and play, except for immediate family, have been middle class Jews. I have found these individuals to be generous and kind and not at all clannish. All regard themselves as and in fact are patriotic Americans. Many have achieved extraordinary success and contributed to the commonweal. Many have gone out of their way to help and comfort me in times of personal crisis.

    I find my personal experiences with individual Jews hard to reconcile with the – to me – obvious observation that, considered as a group, American Jews have had a disastrous impact on the United States in many areas including invidious control of (1) the news media, publishing, and entertainment industries, (2) culture generally, (3) finance, (4) legal institutions. (5) the government generally, and (6) foreign policy in particular. In high school I monitored a college course on democratic political theory (excluding Rousseau’s totalitarian version) and democracy’s totalitarian opponents, i.e., communism and fascism. The readings on fascism included lengthy sections from Rosenberg’s “Myth of the Twentieth Century”. At the time, I thought that even the less hyperbolic of Rosenberg’s rants verged on insanity. Now, after observing our Jewish-dominated late republic hurtling towards utter ruination, I’m not so sure.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. “What have Jews actually done to you? Hacked your bank account? Gypped you out of your house? Shot your dog?” and the answer will likely be, “Nothing.”

    Simple. I served in the Marines for about 7 years as an infantry officer. I met, worked with and greatly valued many 10s of thousands of Marines.

    Infantry is combat arms as are artillery, special ops, missile forces, Marine Air, etc.

    I MET ONE JEWISH OFFICER IN COMBAT ARMS, PERIOD!!!!!

    Now, they were everywhere in professional positions in our sister service, the Navy. Doctors, lawyers, dentists, etc. But almost none in combat arms in America…but well represented in the armed forces of Israel.

    Compare that to their ever-presence in politics and, in particular, among the Neocons who are ceaselessly starting wars and sending non-Jews to die for them. It’s disgusting.

    Onward Christian soldier is the new Jewish American national anthem. They’re disloyal cowards and they’re a fifth column for Israel here in the U.S. If they vaporized tomorrow we’d be better off.

    Here’s a quote from Kissinger which neatly sums it up: “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

    No wonder to me why they were burned in the crematoriums in German during WWII.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniil Adamov
    Germany is not America. There was any number of patriotic German Jewish soldiers in WWI; but a vocal hypermodernist cosmopolitan minority of Jews was assumed to represent the entirety of German Jewry in the Weimar era anti-Semitic discourse.
    , @anon
    "ceaselessly starting wars and sending non-Jews to die for them".

    My simple advice to any non-Jew in the USA would be just not to join the military. Don't be a goyim chump. (I mean its not like you still have the draft).
    , @bjondo
    Met one Jew in the Army. Psychiatrist. Did very little.
    Wait. Rabbis. They serve to make sure kosher foods are bought from Jew suppliers whether there is any one needing the stuff or not. Mostly not.

    Should qualify Sotomayor as an honorary Jew. Remember Obama's last pick - a Jew.

    http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-Features/Sotomayors-Jewish-ties
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. nsa says:
    @turtle
    @ Ace
    You are quite right. His experience led to prejudice.
    As I said, "stereotypes come from somewhere."
    Herr Hitler said the same thing.
    If all, or even most, of the Jews he met in Vienna had been like the nice Jewish folks he knew back home in Linz, there would have been no problem, at least in his mind.

    I myself harbor prejudice against evangelical Christians, at least in a business setting, again based on experience. I like to think of this as, "Batter up. Count is 0 and 1 (or 0 and 2, as the case may be).

    But, I also say that, on a case by case basis, prejudice can be overcome by those who are made to suffer for the sins of their fellows. In other words, "Prove to me you are not like them."

    When dealing with chrissies and jooies…….better get it in writing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Oh yeah, those Hindus and Muslims are so honest and trustworthy. Dude, please. PEOPLE in general are readily prone to evil, and it's difficult to see how Christians are systematically worse than adherents of other religions.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. From two percent of the population?

    I’ve long wondered how that 2% number was arrived at. Who is counted as Jewish? If it’s only those who actively practice the religion, then I’d guess 2% is about right. But how many more are there whose ancestors were Jewish but who aren’t religious (like me) or practice Christianity (like my brother)?

    Granted, the number of non-religious Jews is shrinking, as Corvinus pointed out upthread. My brothers and I would all be considered Jewish by ancestry, but none of our children are, because their mothers aren’t.

    I suspect that support for Israel and Zionism is much stronger among religious Jews than my sort. I’ve never been to Israel, and you’d have to pay me a lot of money to get me to go there. My parents’ opinion was that the state of Israel should never have been created.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  75. @Longfisher
    “What have Jews actually done to you? Hacked your bank account? Gypped you out of your house? Shot your dog?” and the answer will likely be, “Nothing.”

    Simple. I served in the Marines for about 7 years as an infantry officer. I met, worked with and greatly valued many 10s of thousands of Marines.

    Infantry is combat arms as are artillery, special ops, missile forces, Marine Air, etc.

    I MET ONE JEWISH OFFICER IN COMBAT ARMS, PERIOD!!!!!

    Now, they were everywhere in professional positions in our sister service, the Navy. Doctors, lawyers, dentists, etc. But almost none in combat arms in America...but well represented in the armed forces of Israel.

    Compare that to their ever-presence in politics and, in particular, among the Neocons who are ceaselessly starting wars and sending non-Jews to die for them. It's disgusting.

    Onward Christian soldier is the new Jewish American national anthem. They're disloyal cowards and they're a fifth column for Israel here in the U.S. If they vaporized tomorrow we'd be better off.

    Here's a quote from Kissinger which neatly sums it up: “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

    No wonder to me why they were burned in the crematoriums in German during WWII.

    Germany is not America. There was any number of patriotic German Jewish soldiers in WWI; but a vocal hypermodernist cosmopolitan minority of Jews was assumed to represent the entirety of German Jewry in the Weimar era anti-Semitic discourse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Wally says:
    @Anonymous
    People don't like Jews because Jews don't practice the Golden Rule of treating others as they would like to be treated themselves. Instead they force goyim to live by certain rules that Jews themselves would never follow such as political correctness, immigration, assimilation, the list goes on and on.

    Jews are power hungry. They have a winner take all view on life where you are on top or you are a lowly goyim.

    Jews are very subversive taking part in clannish divide and conquer to get power.

    Jews are perverts. They rule the porn industry and look at how they wield power in Hollywood raping all the time.

    Poor Fred, a dilettante in denial of the obvious.

    “We can force through any lie. It just has to be big enough so that a normal person says, ‘Well that cannot be a lie!’. Then the lie cannot be recognized as such. And the lie has to be repeated continuously. Then it is believed and is powerful because it is the belief in a ‘truth.’”
    - from ‘Propaganda’, by Zionist Jew Edward Bernays

    Under the spell of Zionist propaganda, Freshman Fred embarrassingly refers to the thoroughly debunked Auschwitz. The claims of it are scientifically impossible.
    recommended:
    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    and:
    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Max Denken
    The strange thing about "Hitler wasn't so bad" self-professed defenders of the "White Man" is that they manage to be ignorant of the fact that Hitler murdered not only 6 million Jews but also at least 20 million Slavs -- some of the latter in the very same extermination camps...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Wally says:
    @Robert Magill

    Hitler’s complaints against the Jews were along usual lines, that Jews controlled German culture, finance, academia, and the media.
     

    Hatred of Jews may have ranked much lower with Hitler and the top Nazis than did making them and other groups targets for political gain.

     Note that while Americans think of the Holocaust as something the Germans did (I do) to Jews it can look like just another attack by a Christian country (Poland, Russia, England, the Baltics, and so on.)
     

     
    Israel Shamir, who comments here (a Jew in a former incarnation) would strongly protest including Russia in this indictment

    https://robertmagill.wordpress.com/2017/12/15/hark-what-voice-is-that-its-silence/

    Magill’s quoted, absurd Zionist lies:

    “Before piling on a lot of statistics let’s take care of one huge number of those murdered in the camps. Three million Soviet Prisoners of War were killed. Has anyone ever heard the story of even one survivor from among these millions slaughtered? Silence. The Jews have a name for the Holocaust; the Shoah. The survivors among the Romani, better known as the Gypsies, who lost between 500,000 and 1,500,000 also have a name for the genocide; the Pořajmos. The Roma are a private, basically pre-literate people, seemingly without a public voice. More Silence.
    Early on in the purges the Nazis, practitioners of the then popular ‘Science’ of Eugenics, killed 100,000 mentally ill German adults in institutions to cleanse the ‘folk’ of this contamination and perhaps, to begin to learn the death trade. Deep Silence. The Jehovah’s Witnesses refused the Nazi system and contributed their dead to the carnage. Still Silent. Thousands of male homosexuals added to the homegrown bloodbath as well. Heard anything from any of the survivors lately? Silence Again.”

    Also note that Macgill uses Zionist Wikipedia as a source, where Jews alter everything that is in their interest. see: Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    The ‘homosexuals & gypsies’ canard is merely an attempt by Jews to buy votes for their laughable and impossible ’6M & gas chambers’.

    ‘the Gypsy ‘extermination’ Big Lie debunked’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1744

    ‘Gypsy Holocaust?
    The Gypsies under the National Socialist Regime’
    By Carlo Mattogno

    http://codoh.com/library/document/3239/

    The Myth of a Nazi Extermination of Homosexuals by Jack Wikoff

    http://www.cwporter.com/homo.htm

    Gypsies and Homosexuals in the Camps

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1894

    homosexuals – Yad Vashem …

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1930

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. This article should be entitled “1000 Reasons why Fred Reed is a Complete Moron”.

    “The dislike is profoundly visceral, not rational”

    Let’s see Fred.. Heard of the Neocons, near exclusively Jews, running US foreign policy to establish Israel’s hegemony in the Middle East a la Oden Yinon? Who openly acknowledges running Hollywood, Freddie? How about the moral quality of what Hollywood produces.

    Commenting on fashion might be more your speed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  79. When we raise our gaze up, up, up the lofty pedestal of Fred’s carefully manicured self-image we expect to see a wise & fearless rebel.

    What we find is another shabbos goy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  80. Diversity often disappears through assimilation. Today people named O’Toole and Libertini may be proud of their ancestry, but they think of themselves as American, not as Irish and Italian. So do others. Thus hostility to them, once intense, has vanished.

    The major problem of them is not just because they don’t assimilate but about what they truly are, a adapted parasitic human breed, they are a wandering elite without a people, what elites throughout the world tend to be: parasitic, even at not truly voluntary ways.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
    At first they are not like parasites - at first they are akin to a big headed octopus with 10 appendages - one is the mass media, another academia, another banks, Congress.
    Once the octopus has a nation thoroughly in its clutches (just for the discussion let
    us say like America) then the octopus turns into the Chosen parasites .

    As Netanyahu explains : "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away." (to Jonathan Pollard upon exiting Pollard's jail cell) http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Netanyahu

    When that happens the parasites turn back into an Octopus and simply finds another host nation.

    BTW The Octopus has one limp (paralyzed?) appendage it drags with it. It represents the Jewish liberals of the tribe in the particular nation it has in its clutches (just for the discussion let us say America and similar to Chomsky Finkelstein et al).

    They can’t seem to find the courage to dissect them selves from the octopus in order to finally embark on doing what YHWH actually chose the Octopus to do! Become mankind’s blessing and light, uplift humanity and help heal and cure (all the destruction and devastation the octopus-parasites have already done to) the world

    And will continue to do until the Octopus Parasite is anaesthetized then ministered to and rehabilitated in an attempt to transform them from chosen Holy Jews into decent human beings (let’s say akin to Chomsky, Finkelstein et al)

    If the liberal (paralized?) Jews want to finally fulfill their tribes (just for the discussion "bona fide") covenant with YHWh all they need to do is to start organizing, and demonstrating, then marching on Washington ( waving the electric cattle prods they have with them above their hands) and then kick in all the government’s doors - WH, Capital Hill, Supreme Court, Defense Dept. et al - to shock them all enough to scare them into helping them emancipate America from their bizarre tribe’s unholy clutches

    But unfortunately I do not really expect this will happen or that there will ever be a happy ending.

    As Ludwig Borne (born Loeb Baruch a Jew in 1785) admitted in his old age - “once they (the goy cattle) all get bewitched by this Jewish magic circle - no one can get out.”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Otto Zeit says:
    @j
    Should America fall into an Unstable Epoch, the situation of American Jews will be uncomfortable. But America, like all AngoSaxon countries, is very stable. In the long term, their fate will be like the Russian Jews: One third will assimilate, one third will leave for Israel and other countries, and one third will disappear, in this case, because of their extremely low fertility.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. But Jews invent many good things like for example “Political correctness.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    Compound interest too, along with fiat currency and fractional reserve banking, all of which (along with political correctness) are Jewish inventions. And then there's Communism which is also a Jewish invention. I could go on but...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. C-, college sophomore level, thesis needs more research/contemplation. Read Culture of Critique before revisiting topic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  84. polskijoe says:

    Two options for Jews are:

    1)Send many more to Israel and fast. Before more damage is done.
    They will still be a threat but maybe less.
    Start with the duel citizens, billionares, and troskyist (neocons and new left).

    2)Scatter them everywhere. Keep their communities tiny. Isnt that part of their religion?

    Not sure which is the better option.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  85. anon • Disclaimer says:

    You are talking about the impression from Peoria from someone who has the same power on his life and fate as anyone else in Peoria . Give him more power and watch .

    You want to verify ? Check the Jewish Friends of the Labor and Friends of the Conservative in UK and see how they manipulate , obstruct,distort,and then kill the career and prospects , how they influence UN and IAEA or sale of Boeing or Airbus or medications from India . Ditto for Germany and France

    Do you know why France and Germany are sometimes asking Iran to change a ‘bit” here and there ? Do you know why that big change is called ‘bit’ change ?

    Do you know why NYT castigates Egypt for trading with NK but not Israel for trading with Russia China or Burma or Rwanda or S Sudan ?

    Now calculate and see how many have been affected by the people to whom ‘gentiles are viscerally/emotionally but not logically ” angry with.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  86. @turtle
    Stereotypes come from somewhere.
    I have a friend who is prejudiced against Chinese people, based on his dealings with Chinese in the computer industry. His perception (right or wrong, but it is the perception which matters) is that they were "sneaky," "underhanded," they "stuck together against the round eyes."
    Yet, as a school teacher, this same fellow readily bragged up the achievements of his numerous Oriental students. Which tells me that, on a personal level, prejudice can be overcome. As the saying went, back in the days of hippies vs. rednecks, "Bar stool to bar stool, things can be pretty cozy."
    My friend is a devout evangelical Christian. Whenever I see the "fish" symbol, I tend to run the other way. But, I make an exception in his case, because I know him to be, and respect him as, a good man.

    Sounds like he likes Chinese individuals, feels alien among groups of Chinese, a sentiment I share.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. @Jonathan Mason

    Does Schultz of Starbucks do something evil, or does he, like, you know, sell reasonably good coffee at a reasonable price?
     
    No he doesn't. The coffee is lousy, it is overpriced, and the company uses numerous deceptive tax strategies to avoid paying taxes on profits. Is that evil, or not? All a matter of opinion and perspective, I suppose. However, I did not know that Schulz was Jewish until you pointed it out, but it does not surprise me, given his business practices.

    What’s important about Schultz is not that he’s been successful at selling coffee. The important info is that Schultz has leveraged his success at selling coffee to push “refugees” onto his country, to push his baristas to engage customers in a “dialogue about race,” to malign white people tired of being robbed of their own country, and to whack Trump at every opportunity he gets. It’s not their personality that makes Jews objectionable — Fred relies too much on a shaky stereotype — but their racial psychosis that, however understandable (Hitler etc.), is deeply destructive to the white Christian society around them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Well said, Max.
    , @Josecanuc
    "It’s not their personality that makes Jews objectionable — Fred relies too much on a shaky
    stereotype — but their racial psychosis that, however understandable (Hitler etc.), is deeply
    destructive to the white Christian society around them."


    Excellent! Yet If I was your editor I would say you could express it and make it even more understandable by removing some expendable words and simply state:

    “It’s not their personality that makes Jews objectionable...but their psychosis that is deeply destructive to the white Christian society around them."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. j2 says:

    Fred Reed writes nicely, but this time I have to agree with the majority. The article does not analyze the case correctly.

    In the past Jews were represented by their leaders as a group. They paid taxes as a group, they had privileges and restrictions as a group. There were riots against the privileges in Alexandria, but in general this system worked more or less fine as long as the ideas of the Enlightenment and the revolutionaries hosted in Freemason lodges and Carbonari and Communist cells succeeded in changing the world. Before this happened, Jews in Europe were king’s Jews. They lent money to the king, were tax collectors, run state monopolies, made alcohol and so on. Kin allowed them to do usury, so they were rich. Some were killed during the Crusades, some in Chmelniczki rebellion, but in general, fine.

    In the new world (New World=USA, NWO=democracy) there was no place for a tribe, which had privileges and restrictions, so Napoleon and other freed the Jews. They had the choice of assimilating or acting as a tribe. They chose the latter one. It exactly means that they supported each other. You cannot do that in a democracy, it is favoring by ethnic basis, suppression of others.
    So, they were competing as a group against others, who were not acting as a group. Without any
    special intelligence the group will win in such a game. This causes a counter reaction.

    All this was understood already in 1840 and a plan to take Jews to Palestine was created. The rest is history, since the history of Europe after that was largely the result of the plan to take the Jews to Palestine. So, they are there now, but it costed two world wars, communism and Nazism.
    To realize the plan they had to create antisemitism.

    That’s it. No long reasons for antisemitism are needed. It is all here if you just carefully read the steps.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  89. renfro says:

    Well, I was going to point out Fred’s propaganda and omissions point by point.
    But then why bother….the Fred Reed’s are a dime a dozen…malcontents and would be oracles on everything and reverse snobs..you know the guy who doesnt have the correct suit for an occasion so he wears a clown suit as a fuck you and to high light his pretended indifference to his betters….
    Only true thing he has said:
    ”I drifted across Asia, Mexico, Wyoming, hitchhiking and sleeping in ditches until I learned that aberrant behavior, when written about, is literature.
    And that’s his life, writing about his own aberrant life and calling it literature.

    When it comes to Jews listen to a Jew

    Philip Weiss:

    “Remaking the American power structure without Jews is like remaking sports without blacks. At least when it comes to blacks in sports, you can talk about it; you can say that blacks changed sports. But no one is allowed to speak up about something we all quietly know: Jews changed America.”

    “There is hardly an area of public life on which Jews have not had a profound impact in the last generation, as discrimination against them ended and as they gained power. The civil rights movement reflects Jewish values of justice. Feminism is a reflection of liberal Jewish matriarchal values (note the Jewish groups that are talking about Roe v. Wade in opposing John Ashcroft for Attorney General). Ever-more-powerful Jews in the media have ushered in the information age. Psychologically attuned Jews and Hollywood Jews changed the language of popular culture – Seinfeld, Weinstein… altogether they represent the force of Jewish values coming into public life.”

    “…the greatly diminished influence of church on public mores wouldn’t have happened without secularized Jews gaining cultural power.”

    “And no one ever talks about it. The most important change in establishment culture in the last 25 years, and it goes unspoken.”

    “There are so many Jews in the media that the cone of silence falls over the territory where you might expect wider discussion.”

    “I remember when I got to Harvard in 1972, and all my outsider Jewish energy was focused on tearing down the WASP bastions that kept me back. And we tore them down.”

    “…Jewish imagination has been the most powerful force in elite life in the last generation… the celebration of feminism, the emergence of the media: all have been spearheaded by Jews who re-imagined America.”

    “So long as Jews continue to see themselves as powerless, they fail to recognize the effect they have had on society and come to terms with their real spot: big winners in the new order. It looks like the next chapter in the democratic discourse is going to be about winners and losers in the globalist pursuit of excellence.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  90. @Wally
    Poor Fred, a dilettante in denial of the obvious.

    "We can force through any lie. It just has to be big enough so that a normal person says, 'Well that cannot be a lie!'. Then the lie cannot be recognized as such. And the lie has to be repeated continuously. Then it is believed and is powerful because it is the belief in a 'truth.'"
    - from 'Propaganda', by Zionist Jew Edward Bernays
     
    Under the spell of Zionist propaganda, Freshman Fred embarrassingly refers to the thoroughly debunked Auschwitz. The claims of it are scientifically impossible.
    recommended:
    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/img/HHS-300x127.jpg
    and:
    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau
    https://youtu.be/SUc6Y_E5zb0

    www.codoh.com

    The strange thing about “Hitler wasn’t so bad” self-professed defenders of the “White Man” is that they manage to be ignorant of the fact that Hitler murdered not only 6 million Jews but also at least 20 million Slavs — some of the latter in the very same extermination camps…

    Read More
    • Agree: polskijoe
    • Disagree: Cloak And Dagger
    • Replies: @Wally
    "Hitler murdered not only 6 million Jews but also at least 20 million Slavs — some of the latter in the very same extermination camps…"

    Except there is no such proof for either, and you certainly don't have it.
    All just empty Zionist propaganda.

    I also notice you dodged by posted information.


    The "Holocau$t Industry" in court:
    'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'
     
    www.codoh.com

    Jews have been pushing their fake '6,000,000 since at least 1823.

    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php
    http://balder.org/judea/billeder-judea/Scan-New-York-Times-Six-Million-Since-1869-Composite.jpg

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. Jews certainly had nothing to do with illicit federal hate speech crime laws or the selective prosecution of such laws in favor of diversity victim cult freaks:

    https://www.justice.gov/crt/hate-crime-laws

    [MORE]

    Since 1968, when Congress passed, and President Lyndon Johnson signed into law, the first federal hate crimes statute, the Department of Justice has been enforcing federal hate crimes laws. The 1968 statute made it a crime to use, or threaten to use, force to willfully interfere with any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin and because the person is participating in a federally protected activity, such as public education, employment, jury service, travel, or the enjoyment of public accommodations, or helping another person to do so. In 1968, Congress also made it a crime to use, or threaten to use, force to interfere with housing rights because of the victim’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; in 1988, protections on the basis of familial status and were added. In 1996, Congress passed the Church Arson Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. § 247. Under this Act, it is a crime to deface, damage, or destroy religious real property, or interfere with a person’s religious practice, in situations affecting interstate commerce. The Act also bars defacing, damaging, or destroying religious property because of the race, color, or ethnicity of persons associated with the property.

    In 2009, Congress passed, and President Obama signed, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, expanding the federal definition of hate crimes, enhancing the legal toolkit available to prosecutors, and increasing the ability of federal law enforcement to support our state and local partners. This law removed then existing jurisdictional obstacles to prosecutions of certain race- and religion-motivated violence.,, and added new federal protections against crimes based on gender, disability, gender identity, or sexual orientation. Before the Civil Rights Division prosecutes a hate crime, the Attorney General or someone the Attorney General designates must certify, in writing, that (1) the state does not have jurisdiction; (2) the state has requested that the federal government assume jurisdiction; (3) the verdict or sentence obtained pursuant to state charges did not demonstratively vindicate the federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence; or (4) a prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice. In the seven years since the passage of the Shepard-Byrd Act, the Justice Department has charged 72 defendants and convicted 45 defendants under this statute. In total, as of July 15, 2016, the department has charged 258 defendants for hate crimes under multiple statutes over the last seven years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  92. Svigor says:

    And, of course Fred is not completely accurate when he said that “Jews do not assimilate”.

    Well, they’ve been around for 3k years. Or just 2k, if you’re only counting Talmud-Jews. Assimilation, that ain’t.

    “David Goldman–Sadly, American Jews stand out as a horrible example of demographic failure. In the United States, secular and loosely affiliated American Jews, that is, the vast majority, have the lowest fertility rate of any identifiable segment of the American population. As I wrote in my book How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too):

    Nowhere is the fertility gap between religious and non-religious more extreme than among American Jews. As a group, American Jews show the lowest fertility of any ethnic group in the country. That is a matter of great anguish for Jewish community leaders. According to sociologist Steven Cohen, “We are now in the midst of a non-Orthodox Jewish population meltdown. … Among Jews in their 50s, for every 100 Orthodox adults, we have 192 Orthodox children. And for the non-Orthodox, for every 100 adults, we have merely 55 such children.”

    A Jew writing about Jews not breeding enough, and how up in arms Jews are about it, isn’t what I’d call the American model of assimilation. Which group has the second lowest rate (not that Goldman knows, or gives a shit)? Are they bemoaning their low rate? How about the group with the third lowest rate – do they whine about the “silent holocaust”?

    I’m gonna go ahead and assume that the groups with the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc., lowest rates don’t have any articles at that site, whining about it.

    That’s telling, no?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    I would assume that the low birth rate among Jews is, at least partially, due to an unusually high percentage of male and female Jews being homosexual.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. Svigor says:

    The strange thing about “Hitler wasn’t so bad” self-professed defenders of the “White Man” is that they manage to be ignorant of the fact that Hitler murdered not only 6 million Jews but also at least 20 million Slavs — some of the latter in the very same extermination camps…

    Pretty much any WN can tell you that the official narrative says that 12m were killed in the shoah.

    And that the vast majority of Jews are ignorant of anything but the 6m Jewish ones. All the kvetching they do about the shoah, and they don’t even know the most basic facts about it.

    Cuz it’s a tool to be leveraged, not something they take seriously.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  94. MBlanc46 says:
    @Svigor

    Since the writer of this particular piece of dreck is obviously a novice at lining up thoughts and assigning words to them, charity demands a D+.
     
    Fred's schtick seems to be to get 3/4s of a way through a thought, then move on to the next. If you dot all the i's and cross all the t's and carry out the 3/4 thoughts to their 1.0 conclusions and connect all the dots, you get Julius Streicher.

    Fred, you know we love most of your columns, but this one is deeply flawed:
     
    I don't. I find him rather tiresome. He just stirs the shit and collects a check (I assume he's getting paid here, even if only indirectly by gaining a wider audience). I usually don't bother reading his stuff.

    For one who usually doesn’t read his stuff, you sure do go on about it. And on and on and on.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Svigor says:

    Anyone who examines the historical record and the history of the Jews in the diaspora with an open mind will become anti-semitic.

    Especially so, considering how low the bar is. Anything but fawning over Jews or complete silence on the subject is “antisemitism.” Hell, silence on the subject is probably interpreted by Jews and their servants as “antisemitism,” in the right circumstances. Hell, overdoing the fawning is probably “suspect,” too.

    They certainly wouldn’t describe an Italian marrying a Greek as “intermarriage,” a few potential exceptions notwithstanding.

    I’m glad to see someone else finally pointing this out.

    This sentence is written as if Hitler’s claims are self evidently false and he was just a mindless Jew hater. Jews were also way overrepresented as communist agitators. Again, examine the historical record instead of the usual propaganda and prevarications of appointed court historians.

    Yeah. Big Media’s version of the story starts in 1939, or with the rise of Hitler, or whatever. But the story really begins in 1917, with the rise of the Jews in Russia, and their heavy involvement in the genocidal phase of Soviet history. We may have swept it under the rug because Atlantic Ocean (among other reasons), but the Germans didn’t have that luxury. They saw the Jews working to do the same thing in Germany, and, well, they chose to manhandle the Jews, rather than be manhandled by them.

    Worse–and this has caused millions of deaths–Jews are often successful. It doesn’t matter whether the success arises from superior intelligence, greater drive, collusion, or the will of Yahweh. It happens.

    Hard to know where to begin to correct Reed’s misstatements, but Andrew Joyce offers a pretty comprehensive look at the question –

    SC is right to highlight this little gem. It’s pretty absurd. “They hate us because we’re so fabulous.” No, whites aren’t niggers. We are perfectly capable of putting people on the Moon all by ourselves, thank you. We don’t resent people for being fabulous.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  96. Svigor says:

    Since I presume Fred has read articles here on UNZ by astute iconoclasts such as Giraldi, MacDonald and Israel Shamir, he should be more acquainted with the hidden vagaries of this complex subject. But no. Fred dishes up instead a grab-bag of cliches, tropes and stereotypes. Ho hum.

    Very well said. Fred’s just not a very interesting writer.

    That particular incident actually speaks well of the Jews, don’t you think? Regardless of what one thinks of the Crusades themselves. The stereotype in all times is that Jews are unpatriotic and will not fight for the land they live in, but often enough this has turned out to be untrue. This is one such instance, though here it will have been more a matter of practicality.

    It’s certainly true today. I think Jews are more famous for being unreliable than for being reliably unpatriotic. They can be “patriots” (it’s weird to speak of Jews as “patriotic” toward anything but Jewry or Israel; to the extent they are, they’re not really Jews), but it’s usually a matter of convenience.

    Every part of a Boeing 787 is designed to be as light as can possibly be made.
    Therefore a Boeing 787 is a light object.

    Fred, paraphrased;

    “no one Jew whom I have met has done me any irremedial harm
    therefore Jews as a whole do no harm.”

    As you can see, fallacy of composition.

    While it may be the case that no one Jew that Fred (or I) have met has done me irrevocable harm, this does not allow one to draw the conclusion that Jews as a whole have not harmed American society as a whole.

    Well said. A lot of philosemites have this stupid, cartoon version of countersemitism put into their heads by Jews. Most of us didn’t get to countersemitism because we were harmed or cheated by a Jew we know. If we all took the mouse’s point of view, none of us would be countersemites. It’s when you take the eagle’s point of view, get a look at the big picture, that the problems become apparent.

    Jus’ Sayin’… says:
    March 5, 2018 at 5:08 pm GMT • 200 Words

    I’ve known only a few Jews, but I can say something similar. I had a Jewish boss once, he was a nice, easygoing, quiet, totally harmless kind of guy. I remember a Jewish classmate in high school; a dipshit, but not in any extraordinary way. Many non-Jews were worse. Had one Jewish neighbor who was a mensch. Had another who was no great shakes, but not bad, either. Had another who was a complete dick. Had a Jewish neighbor kid who was a perv. Knew a couple of extremely snobby JAP girls. Had a dumb (yes, I said dumb – the guy was stupid) Jewish roommate who leaned slightly prick but nothing to write home about.

    Just people. It’s when you start to look at the aggregate behavior that you start seeing the (pretty huge) problems.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  97. Svigor says:

    I mean think about it; Jews are a small minority. There just aren’t enough of them to piss off enough people at the interpersonal level for countersemitism to become a growth industry. Nobody but people who’d lived in NYC and LA would be countersemites. That isn’t enough to overcome the very strong taboo on countersemitism.

    Only deranged people could come to countersemitism at the hands of such limited contact. It wouldn’t make any sense.

    And countersemitism would be way behind anti-black animus (it’s behind, but not nearly as far behind as it would be). Blacks are far more numerous, and waaaay more obnoxious and conspicuous on an interpersonal level.

    Fred’s “Jews are hated because they’re successful” thing is a good example of how he only gets part of the way through a thought. It’s part of a true statement; obviously nobody would care if Jews were unsuccessful nation-wreckers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  98. @Ilyana_Rozumova
    But Jews invent many good things like for example "Political correctness."

    Compound interest too, along with fiat currency and fractional reserve banking, all of which (along with political correctness) are Jewish inventions. And then there’s Communism which is also a Jewish invention. I could go on but…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I don't know who invented compund interest, fiat currency, fractional reserve banking, all of financial wizardry, and political correctness.

    I know though, that, were not greed, short-sightedness and aversion to truth underlying staples of the human mind, those inventions would not have thrived.

    And to focus on who invented those things (or who is apter at exploiting them) instead of why they have spread is a form of reality avoidance.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. anon • Disclaimer says:

    On eve of Netanyahu-Trump talks, AIPAC chief calls for Palestinian statehood
    What’s needed, Howard Kohr declares, is ‘two states for two peoples: One Jewish with secure and defensible borders, and one Palestinian with its own flag and its own future’
    By TOI staff http://www.timesofisrael.com

    There is a reason for this sort of utterances from the forked tongue and mind. The train has left the station. A picture of the train ( 2 state solution- all that is left ) It gives the AIPAC to claim after 5 yrs 10 yrs or 30 yrs that they stood for 2 state solution and author like this will cite this as evidence forgetting all the hurdles- economic physical diplomatic economic -the AIPAC put and maintained against any country asking for a just solution.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  100. @gsjackson
    I believe Sotomayor is half Jewish.

    Sotomayor is not Jewish. Not at all. Sotomayor is a lesbian, but not a Jewish lesbian. Unlike Kagan who is a Jewish lesbian. And unlike Ginsburg who is a Jewish-heterosexual.

    Two-thirds of the women of the supreme court are lesbians. Two-ninths of the supreme court are homosexuals. Now that’s over-representation!

    All the Jews and lesbians are leftists though.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Hey, with Souter off the Court, at least we're DOWN to only two homosexuals out of nine "Justices."

    As for Kagan, the lesbians called and said "she's too ugly even for us, you take her."
    , @Truth
    No, actually all three are transsexuals. There are no female justices.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDILliQYaWM
    , @Bardon Kaldian

    Two-thirds of the women of the supreme court are lesbians. Two-ninths of the supreme court are homosexuals. Now that’s over-representation!
     
    Doubt it. With homos you never know (and especially lesbians). Not few of men were, historically, thought of as gays (Leonardo, Schubert,..) but they were basically asexual.

    With females, some were doubtlessly homo (Willa Cather, Marguerite Yourcenar,..). Just, female brain being different, female sexuality is not as easy to pinpoint as male is. Most/many "lesbians" marry, have children, even "switch" their "orientation": https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-169412893/lesbian-after-marriage-jennifer-baumgardner-takes

    DEBORAH ABBOTT WAS SOMEWHAT HAPPILY MARRIED to a nice man with whom she'd created two adorable sons before she realized that the intense rapport with her best friend, Rachel, was the first step toward love and "unbelievably thrilling" sex with women. After separating from her husband, she'd often laugh at her dueling identities. "I would be at the PTA meeting and people would assume that I was heterosexual," says Abbott. "And then I'd be dancing at a club and people would be shocked to learn I had an ex-husband and kids!"
     
    Is there a gay man who would naturally (not repressing anything before) switch his sex orientation? Nah, such things don't happen.

    As the Talmud (appropriate comment for this topic) says: Women are a different nation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. KenH says:

    All this babble about some individual Jews being harmless overlooks the fact that there’s many who are harmful, very much so, at least from a pro-white standpoint. Like the Oakland, CA mayor who tipped off illegal aliens of the impending ICE raid last week and Jewish mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, who will issue ID cards to illegal aliens living in Chicago.

    https://www.jta.org/2018/03/04/news-opinion/jewish-mayor-oakland-defends-decision-tip-off-community-immigration-raid

    Chucky Schumer recently refused to vote for Trump’s federal judge nominees since they are white males. We need to deport him so he can serve in the Israeli knesset and demand Muslim and Christian judges on Israeli courts.

    As far as I know, virtually every Jew who attains political office is a left wing fanatic who works tirelessly against white racial interests. If Fred or anyone has evidence to the contrary then let’s see it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  102. songbird says:

    I wouldn’t count on China letting them in.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. @nsa
    When dealing with chrissies and jooies.......better get it in writing.

    Oh yeah, those Hindus and Muslims are so honest and trustworthy. Dude, please. PEOPLE in general are readily prone to evil, and it’s difficult to see how Christians are systematically worse than adherents of other religions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Oh yeah, those Hindus and Muslims are so honest and trustworthy."

    Generally, they exhibit those two traits.

    "PEOPLE in general are readily prone to evil, and it’s difficult to see how Christians are systematically worse than adherents of other religions."

    Corrected for accuracy --> People in general make choices that lead them to focus on being good or focus on being evil. Moreover, people in any and every religion abuse their Good Book and the word of God for their own designs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @Max Denken
    What's important about Schultz is not that he's been successful at selling coffee. The important info is that Schultz has leveraged his success at selling coffee to push "refugees" onto his country, to push his baristas to engage customers in a "dialogue about race," to malign white people tired of being robbed of their own country, and to whack Trump at every opportunity he gets. It's not their personality that makes Jews objectionable -- Fred relies too much on a shaky stereotype -- but their racial psychosis that, however understandable (Hitler etc.), is deeply destructive to the white Christian society around them.

    Well said, Max.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @Svigor

    I was astonished to find that my Nepalese trekking guides were intensely hostile to Jews. They said that Jews (actually Israelis in most cases I think, but the Nepalese do not seem to make the distinction) were loud, demanding, and always trying to force down the guides’ fees. Historically the hostility has often been powerful and, not infrequently, murderous. Jews have been expelled from country after country, excluded from polite society, subjected to quotas,and required to live in certain regions. Why?
     
    LOL.

    No, see, this is just brainwashing by the Great Global Antisemitic Conspiracy. They read some virulent antisemitism online first. Then, primed for antisemitism, they saw bad behavior from Jews where it didn't exist.

    How much anti-Jewish hostility is there today in America? A lot? A little? Is it negligible? Potentially explosive? It is hard to tell because disliking Jews is often a firing offense, and a controlled press makes discussion impossible.
     
    Yeah, no recipe for animus there.

    Countersemitism is probably less common than the countersemites think, and more common than the philosemites think.

    Jewish success isn't the problem. Jews are very fond of this answer, because it strokes their ethnic egos, and feeds their dindu nuffin culture (nobody, I mean NOBODY, does dindu culture like the Jews), but it's silly. Whites are rich tourists; did your Nepalese friends say they didn't like whites? Or do you suppose they bitch to their Jewish clients about whites? I suppose it's possible.

    Countersemitism thrives despite an extremely hostile environment (it's firing, ruination, and unpersoning stateside; prison time in Europe) because there are much better reasons for it than envy. No serious person takes up countersemitism trivially; the cost is too high. There are far easier ways to work out one's psychological needs, if that's the only motive. No, countersemitism is driven by altruism.

    Finally there is Israel, the albatross around the Jewish neck, making it impossible for Jews quietly to be more or less normal Americans.
     
    Jews make it impossible. All they have to do is what whites would do; turn on Israel the way whites turned on South Africa. All they have to do is be consistent in their leftism, and subject themselves to the same rules that they enforce on others. You just glide past this and start yakking about Israel; what they do is their business, what the Jewish diaspora does is our business.

    Whites and Jews really are different.

    Jewish behavioral profile: "we should be the last people to have to live by the rules we push on everyone else."
    White behavioral profile: "we can't push rules on everyone else that we aren't already living by ourselves."

    A rational person might ask, “So what?” Do the Supreme Court’s Jewish justices make Jewish decisions–whatever that might mean? Or do they vote like any four NPR listeners chosen at random? Did Mark Zuckerberg do anything underhanded? Or was he a very bright Jewish kid who had an idea and the strength of character to push it into existence? Does Schultz of Starbucks do something evil, or does he, like, you know, sell reasonably good coffee at a reasonable price?

    It doesn’t matter. They are there, so they must be conspiring. And their influence is becoming more obvious, as with Trump’s subservience (as seen by much of the world) to Israel in planning to move the embassy.
     
    A rational person might point to the Jews and their leftism, support for "diversity" and such. Jews say "we need black faces here, brown faces," etc., but then we're not supposed to turn around and say, "fine, we need white gentile faces in here"? Sauce, gander. Jews see removal of Jews as antisemitism, so we should see removal of white gentile faces as anti-white racism. Let Jews and all the rest advocate for their own representation, and we whites will advocate for ours.

    That's the rational response.

    People who think they are defending Jews will point to Jewish contributions to nearly everything–science, music, math, technology, literature, charity, medicine, support for symphonies. These contributions are real and immense. With respect to anti-Jewish politics, they are also irrelevant or worse. Since the hostility to Jews rests largely on their excessive presence (again, in the eyes of the anti-Jewish) pointing to their intellectual contributions just increases the dislike. It emphasizes both the Jewish presence and apparent superiority.
     
    Nah. Jews follow whites around, the same way blacks do. Jews need whites, to live in white countries, the same way blacks do. Jews chimp out at the thought of being excluded from white communities or countries, the same way blacks do. That burning need is not the hallmark of superiority. Whites, on the other hand, don't need either group. They certainly don't need to follow either around, or go ape at the idea of being excluded from their communities or countries.

    This explains a lot of the chip on the Jewish shoulder. Jews have a love-hate, superiority-inferiority complex going with whites, big time.

    America is not really stable.
     
    Owed mostly to diversity, which in turn is owed largely to the Jews, and their tireless efforts from 1924 to 1965 to pry open our borders.

    Excellent comment, thank you. The thrust of Fred’s article was simply, ‘It doesn’t matter.’ But it does.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. @Paul Yarbles
    Sotomayor is not Jewish. Not at all. Sotomayor is a lesbian, but not a Jewish lesbian. Unlike Kagan who is a Jewish lesbian. And unlike Ginsburg who is a Jewish-heterosexual.

    Two-thirds of the women of the supreme court are lesbians. Two-ninths of the supreme court are homosexuals. Now that's over-representation!

    All the Jews and lesbians are leftists though.

    Hey, with Souter off the Court, at least we’re DOWN to only two homosexuals out of nine “Justices.”

    As for Kagan, the lesbians called and said “she’s too ugly even for us, you take her.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The criminal zionist tribe has gone tooooooo far. They should get lost from occupied Palestine and go to jewish state in New York now. Read the following to see how criminal this tribe is.

    https://electronicintifada.net/content/why-does-virgin-find-palestinian-couscous-offensive/23276

    [Virgin Atlantic has changed the name of an in-flight meal after social media backlash from pro-Israel supporters.

    The dish – a mix of Maftoul and other couscous, tomatoes and cucumber seasoned with parsley, mint and lemon vinaigrette – was formerly called “Palestinian couscous salad” on the menu.

    However, the name has since been changed to “couscous salad” after various complaints. Some social media users threatened to boycott the airline, accusing Virgin of being “terrorist sympathisers”
    One customer giving the name Dani Williams took to social media to accuse the company of being “terrorist sympathizers” for using the descriptor. In a tweet, Williams posted a photograph of the menu and wrote: “last time you get my money.”]

    BOYCOTT THE VIRGIN ATLANTIC FLIGHT

    Destroy zionism and its supporters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  108. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    You are still a eunuch.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  109. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    One reason people have problem with Jews is the discrepancy between what Jews preach and what Jews practice.

    Italians, Iranians, Chinese, Turks, and etc don’t go around preaching to the world in the self-righteous manner that Jews do. They do their own thing in their own nations, and leave others alone.

    But Jews preach to the whole world about how their way is the only way… but they don’t practice what they preach.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Everything Jews preach outside of Israel (diversity, open borders, unrestricted immigration, etc.) is the exact opposite of what Jews practice in Israel itself.
    , @Santoculto
    Jews, at priori, are not wrong about that, the problem is not to teach reason to dumb and lazy goyim but use it to advance their selfish interests, instead try to help them, use them as always has been...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Well, the charge of Dual Loyalty is no longer a problem since Jews used media and government to push the Narrative that US and Israel interests are one and the same.

    They bought up all whore politicians to spout the same line.

    So, dual loyalty has been made into a single loyalty since the official US line is what is good for Israel is good for the US.

    It used to be Dual Loyalty when Jews didn’t control the US. Back then, American interests could diverge from Jewish/Zionist interests.

    But ever since Jews took over, they rigged it so that whatever Israel wants, the US has to oblige, and all politicians and all of media must sing praises to Israel, mute any criticism, and chant over and over, “Israel is America’s greatest ally.”

    That way, Jews fixed the problem of dual loyalty. They made American interests same as Israeli interests. Just like there is ‘Judeo-Christian’, there is ‘Judeo-American’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  111. One of Fredo’s worst articles. But to him – probably his best. He just does this to troll his readers.

    He couldn’t possibly be this stupid, could he?

    Svigor, excellent comments.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  112. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Longfisher
    “What have Jews actually done to you? Hacked your bank account? Gypped you out of your house? Shot your dog?” and the answer will likely be, “Nothing.”

    Simple. I served in the Marines for about 7 years as an infantry officer. I met, worked with and greatly valued many 10s of thousands of Marines.

    Infantry is combat arms as are artillery, special ops, missile forces, Marine Air, etc.

    I MET ONE JEWISH OFFICER IN COMBAT ARMS, PERIOD!!!!!

    Now, they were everywhere in professional positions in our sister service, the Navy. Doctors, lawyers, dentists, etc. But almost none in combat arms in America...but well represented in the armed forces of Israel.

    Compare that to their ever-presence in politics and, in particular, among the Neocons who are ceaselessly starting wars and sending non-Jews to die for them. It's disgusting.

    Onward Christian soldier is the new Jewish American national anthem. They're disloyal cowards and they're a fifth column for Israel here in the U.S. If they vaporized tomorrow we'd be better off.

    Here's a quote from Kissinger which neatly sums it up: “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

    No wonder to me why they were burned in the crematoriums in German during WWII.

    “ceaselessly starting wars and sending non-Jews to die for them”.

    My simple advice to any non-Jew in the USA would be just not to join the military. Don’t be a goyim chump. (I mean its not like you still have the draft).

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Sounds good until the fed gov calls the military to suppress US and it consists of an African and Mexican majority with, at best, little affection or loyalty to us.

    What is the least bad solution in this situation? Certainly patriots should join local, county, and state police forces, but like you said, never become active-status full-time military.

    It's especially important to have large numbers of patriots within the police forces if, as I expect, private ownership of firearms in the USA will eventually be largely restricted to "law enforcement" personnel.

    I'd suggest that patriots join only the Reserves, not active-duty full-time military, but of course Reserves can be and are called up and deployed for destructive non-defensive / non-retaliatory aggression abroad.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    One reason people have problem with Jews is the discrepancy between what Jews preach and what Jews practice.

    Italians, Iranians, Chinese, Turks, and etc don't go around preaching to the world in the self-righteous manner that Jews do. They do their own thing in their own nations, and leave others alone.

    But Jews preach to the whole world about how their way is the only way... but they don't practice what they preach.

    Everything Jews preach outside of Israel (diversity, open borders, unrestricted immigration, etc.) is the exact opposite of what Jews practice in Israel itself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Yes, it's a form of unconscious (= true identity) - conscious/mask (= identity shown to the others, and even to one's own ego) opposition.

    You will find such twoness it wherever you find humans, on an individual level. What changes is the "scope", according to the level of ethnocentrism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. TG says:

    Hm. Yes, interesting. I think that, indeed, a lot of it is that Jews – for whatever reason – tend to be successful, and to hold themselves apart – a potentially toxic combination, socially.

    But: “What have Jews actually done to you? Hacked your bank account? Gypped you out of your house?” Well, actually, yes. Look at the trillions of dollars we’re throwing at subsidizing Wall Street (no, TARP was a sideshow). One example: you are getting like 0% interest on your savings accounts, yes? Well, that’s a subsidy to the big banks – they don’t have to pay you any interest because the big banks have bribed the government to give them unlimited cash at 0% interest. Etc. And these big Wall Street banks are overwhelmingly controlled by Jews. Granted, only something like 0.0001% (or so) of Jews are Wall Street CEOs, but you get the idea. And so on and so forth. So, one can see how this could spread.

    The Jews are, in general, so smart and talented. As individuals they can be wonderful (except for those Wall Street CEOs, but there are some rapacious gentiles on Wall Street as well). But how can they be so blind? Can they not see how their attitudes can fuel an often irrational (but not unexpected!) hatred and resentment? Is it perhaps social loyalty, that they cannot criticize their fellow Jews who are disgusting parasitical bankers, and eventually the bill comes due for those who are themselves blameless? Why, for all their talents and wisdom and personal charm, are Jews as a class so blind in this regards?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  115. Wally says:
    @Max Denken
    The strange thing about "Hitler wasn't so bad" self-professed defenders of the "White Man" is that they manage to be ignorant of the fact that Hitler murdered not only 6 million Jews but also at least 20 million Slavs -- some of the latter in the very same extermination camps...

    “Hitler murdered not only 6 million Jews but also at least 20 million Slavs — some of the latter in the very same extermination camps…”

    Except there is no such proof for either, and you certainly don’t have it.
    All just empty Zionist propaganda.

    I also notice you dodged by posted information.

    The “Holocau$t Industry” in court:
    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, … but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    http://www.codoh.com

    Jews have been pushing their fake ’6,000,000 since at least 1823.

    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF

    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

    Read More
    • Replies: @Max Denken
    I dodge nothing, but on the other hand I notice that you are a fanatic. Discussing Hitler, Holocaust 1, Holocaust 2 (of the Slavs) or the JQ with you would be like trying to convince a Muslim that Muhammad did not quite leap on his horse to heaven, or trying to challenge a 15th century padre's notions of the Holy Trinity. Happy hallucinations, my friend.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Wally - you'll be glad to know that some French documentary makers in 2015 made a film which I saw on Australia's Foxtel 's History Channel called approx. The Secret History of WW2 Ep 5 The Holocaust which will update your knowledge of something you care passionately about.

    I criticise it for saying weakly near the end that the Allied bombing of chemical plants not far from Auschwicz showed that they could have taken out the gas chambers when the most credible experts had already explained why neither bombing the railways nor attempting precision bombing would be a realistic option.

    You will enjoy just one thing and that is my second criticism. After more that once referring to the 3.5 to 4 million Jews the Nazis explicitly aimed to eliminate out of Europe's 11 million Jews it stated without elaboration near the end that 6 million Jews were murdered.

    That's the end of the joy for you because what has now been given air is all the information that was being given to the Allies, and its sources, from 1940 or 41 onwards.

    In late 1941 when he could do nothing about it Churchill received information from Enigma intercepts/transcripts that Jews were being murdered in the Soviet Union by shootings of thousands at a time (eventually amounting to about 1 million) and this was undeniable because it was from German supposedly secret communications.

    Then Witold Pilecki ( see Wikipedia entry if you haven't heard of him) began the process of getting precise information out of Auschwicz to the Polish Government in exile in London which of course was passed on to the major Allies. He had deliberately had himself arrested so he could join resistance people already in Auschwicz in 1940 with a view to organising a revolt, which proved impossible. His first communication of the reality, including the gas chambers, was in 1942 via the amazing escape of four Poles in a German car through the front gate. One, who died last year at the age of 98 was interviewed. His name, qv, was Kazimierz Piechowski.

    Later Pilecki escaped and survived the Warsaw uprising (but executed in 1949 by the Communists). His reports were shown so that, if one could read Polish, what was being narrated could be verified or falsified.

    But then the big one, who had to escape Germany in 1943 from which he went to Zurich and married his Jewish mistress. He was Eduard Schulte, an important German industrialist doing well financially out of the war it seems but secretly, as an upper class German, despising Hitler and the Nazis. He apparently got some of the earliest warnings about a deliberate extermination of the Jews out to the Allies via a Jewish banker in Zurich who promised not to reveal his name. A couple of historians were featured saying that research which eventually disclosed Schulte as the main reliable inside source of information was amongst their most satisfying, partly it seems because so difficult. But not in doubt.

    So, what do you make of this contemporaneous information about the carefully, euphemistically, described deliberate Final Solution to the Jewish Question? No, don't answer for a while. Consider.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. renfro says:

    Importantly, Jewish presence is seen as Jewish conspiracy. Four Jews on the Supreme Court? From two percent of the population? My God, they must be up to something. A conspiracy, doubtless. But a conspiracy to do what? A candidate theory, correct as it happens, is that Jews as a people do anything and everything they can to advance the fortunes of Israel/Jews.

    Well yes they frequently are up to something . Even in the Supreme Court.

    Jews Sue Town over Christian Prayers in Town Meetings. The Supremes ruled against them but the 3 Jewish Supremes dissented from the majority opinion.

    http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-court-prayer-20140506-story.html

    A Supreme Court divided along both ideological and religious lines cleared the way Monday for local officials to open public meetings with explicitly Christian prayers, ruling that the Constitution does not require government-sponsored religious invocations to be “addressed only to a generic God.”
    The 5-4 opinion puts the court’s stamp of approval on a trend in conservative communities to include more overtly religious references in public meetings.
    The five justices in the majority — Kennedy, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. — are Catholic. Three of the four dissenters — Kagan and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer — are Jewish. The fourth, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, was raised Catholic but is not a regular churchgoer”

    The propaganda Reed types put out in defense of the tribe just isn’t very good. I think one reason the anti Semitism smear no longer has much bite is because of the simple minded ditties like this article that totally fail due to the author’s obvious contempt for the public and the ease with which his claims can be exposed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill jones
    So, three yids and a wide Latina versus people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. Mario964 says:

    Mr. Reed why are you rumbling on such a sensitive subject while you don’t know anything about it?

    Quote:
    The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” -Baruch Levy, 1879.

    Quote:
    “Give me control of a nations currency and I care not who makes its laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild

    In order to learn something about a subject that you are dealing with without knowing what you are talking about I kindly advise you to watch this video:

    You will then learn what kind of weltanschauung has been at the root of Judaism throughout the millennia till today when it comes to dealing with the goyim. Please note that the man exposing such outstanding criminal racism against all non-Jew is a highly respected and authoritative Rabbi David Bar-Hayim, the head of a rabbinical court and an institute in Jerusalem for teaching the Torah.
    You will then “discover” that the Torah teaches that in the eyes of God the life of a Jew is more precious that the life of a non-Jew because God has expressly declared that Jews are above all other (sub)human beings, therefore affirming that all humans are equal in front of God is anathema [which BTW explains the visceral hate of the Jews against Christianity since the coming of Jesus Christ till today]. You will also learn that the best of non-Jews should be killed in warfare, because a non-Jew is like a snake that is better dead than alive and the Christians particularly so because they are guilty of
    Avodah Zarah, i.e. idolatry, the uppermost capital offence deserving the death penalty.
    There are more jewels: it is permissible to break the sabbath in order to save a Jew in danger but not to save a non-Jew in danger because all lives are not equal, neither should a Jew return to a non-Jew something that he has lost.
    To make it short: hateful racism against all non-Jew is a God sanctioned duty since the beginning of time! And this is particularly compelling when it comes to Christians, the uppermost enemies of the Jews.

    I kindly advise you to change the pompous name of your blog from Fred on everything to Fred on everything including what I don’t know anything about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    Can Fred really be this ignorant?

    I suspect not.
    , @Mitchell Porter
    The quote attributed to "Baruch Levy" is fake. It comes from a 1928 French article on "The secret origins of Bolshevism" (quote), was immediately protested as fake, but still circulates, with contemporary upgrades like the substitution of "new world order" for "universal republic".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Truth says:
    @Paul Yarbles
    Sotomayor is not Jewish. Not at all. Sotomayor is a lesbian, but not a Jewish lesbian. Unlike Kagan who is a Jewish lesbian. And unlike Ginsburg who is a Jewish-heterosexual.

    Two-thirds of the women of the supreme court are lesbians. Two-ninths of the supreme court are homosexuals. Now that's over-representation!

    All the Jews and lesbians are leftists though.

    No, actually all three are transsexuals. There are no female justices.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    Jews have ''excess'' of manly women and efeminate men, maybe partly because their higher verbal intelligence. Among non-jewish students and teachers of humanities & arts the same pattern is visible.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. @Mario964
    Mr. Reed why are you rumbling on such a sensitive subject while you don't know anything about it?

    Quote:
    The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” -Baruch Levy, 1879.

    Quote:
    “Give me control of a nations currency and I care not who makes its laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild

    In order to learn something about a subject that you are dealing with without knowing what you are talking about I kindly advise you to watch this video:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cePM18Yvp8
    You will then learn what kind of weltanschauung has been at the root of Judaism throughout the millennia till today when it comes to dealing with the goyim. Please note that the man exposing such outstanding criminal racism against all non-Jew is a highly respected and authoritative Rabbi David Bar-Hayim, the head of a rabbinical court and an institute in Jerusalem for teaching the Torah.
    You will then "discover" that the Torah teaches that in the eyes of God the life of a Jew is more precious that the life of a non-Jew because God has expressly declared that Jews are above all other (sub)human beings, therefore affirming that all humans are equal in front of God is anathema [which BTW explains the visceral hate of the Jews against Christianity since the coming of Jesus Christ till today]. You will also learn that the best of non-Jews should be killed in warfare, because a non-Jew is like a snake that is better dead than alive and the Christians particularly so because they are guilty of
    Avodah Zarah, i.e. idolatry, the uppermost capital offence deserving the death penalty.
    There are more jewels: it is permissible to break the sabbath in order to save a Jew in danger but not to save a non-Jew in danger because all lives are not equal, neither should a Jew return to a non-Jew something that he has lost.
    To make it short: hateful racism against all non-Jew is a God sanctioned duty since the beginning of time! And this is particularly compelling when it comes to Christians, the uppermost enemies of the Jews.

    I kindly advise you to change the pompous name of your blog from Fred on everything to Fred on everything including what I don't know anything about.

    Can Fred really be this ignorant?

    I suspect not.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    LOL. Well he could be, but seeing as how he as been self-reliant for 70+ years, the odds are against it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Carroll Price
    Compound interest too, along with fiat currency and fractional reserve banking, all of which (along with political correctness) are Jewish inventions. And then there's Communism which is also a Jewish invention. I could go on but...

    I don’t know who invented compund interest, fiat currency, fractional reserve banking, all of financial wizardry, and political correctness.

    I know though, that, were not greed, short-sightedness and aversion to truth underlying staples of the human mind, those inventions would not have thrived.

    And to focus on who invented those things (or who is apter at exploiting them) instead of why they have spread is a form of reality avoidance.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @anon
    Everything Jews preach outside of Israel (diversity, open borders, unrestricted immigration, etc.) is the exact opposite of what Jews practice in Israel itself.

    Yes, it’s a form of unconscious (= true identity) – conscious/mask (= identity shown to the others, and even to one’s own ego) opposition.

    You will find such twoness it wherever you find humans, on an individual level. What changes is the “scope”, according to the level of ethnocentrism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. Although I would have phrased some things differently, this is, in my opinion, a very good piece. For anyone interested in antisemitism & its history, I’d recommend masterful Walter Laqueur’s dispassionate survey: http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=E194C4F4F44E1146ACC4881034E0CDDC

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  123. @Anon
    One reason people have problem with Jews is the discrepancy between what Jews preach and what Jews practice.

    Italians, Iranians, Chinese, Turks, and etc don't go around preaching to the world in the self-righteous manner that Jews do. They do their own thing in their own nations, and leave others alone.

    But Jews preach to the whole world about how their way is the only way... but they don't practice what they preach.

    Jews, at priori, are not wrong about that, the problem is not to teach reason to dumb and lazy goyim but use it to advance their selfish interests, instead try to help them, use them as always has been…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. Jewstorm is when their ”weirdos”/excentrics become allies of ”squared-mind/conventionals. Often or in non-jewish people’s, they are enemies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  125. @Truth
    No, actually all three are transsexuals. There are no female justices.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDILliQYaWM

    Jews have ”excess” of manly women and efeminate men, maybe partly because their higher verbal intelligence. Among non-jewish students and teachers of humanities & arts the same pattern is visible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Maybe, but they certainly have "excess" manly women and because so many of their daddy chopped their son's balls off at birth and raised them as women, for power and influence.

    Been happening since the pyramids were built.

    Ecclesiastes 1:9

    The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. Corvinus says:
    @RadicalCenter
    Oh yeah, those Hindus and Muslims are so honest and trustworthy. Dude, please. PEOPLE in general are readily prone to evil, and it's difficult to see how Christians are systematically worse than adherents of other religions.

    “Oh yeah, those Hindus and Muslims are so honest and trustworthy.”

    Generally, they exhibit those two traits.

    “PEOPLE in general are readily prone to evil, and it’s difficult to see how Christians are systematically worse than adherents of other religions.”

    Corrected for accuracy –> People in general make choices that lead them to focus on being good or focus on being evil. Moreover, people in any and every religion abuse their Good Book and the word of God for their own designs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    “With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”
    Steven Weinberg, quoted in The New York Times, April 20, 1999
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. @Paul Yarbles
    Sotomayor is not Jewish. Not at all. Sotomayor is a lesbian, but not a Jewish lesbian. Unlike Kagan who is a Jewish lesbian. And unlike Ginsburg who is a Jewish-heterosexual.

    Two-thirds of the women of the supreme court are lesbians. Two-ninths of the supreme court are homosexuals. Now that's over-representation!

    All the Jews and lesbians are leftists though.

    Two-thirds of the women of the supreme court are lesbians. Two-ninths of the supreme court are homosexuals. Now that’s over-representation!

    Doubt it. With homos you never know (and especially lesbians). Not few of men were, historically, thought of as gays (Leonardo, Schubert,..) but they were basically asexual.

    With females, some were doubtlessly homo (Willa Cather, Marguerite Yourcenar,..). Just, female brain being different, female sexuality is not as easy to pinpoint as male is. Most/many “lesbians” marry, have children, even “switch” their “orientation”: https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-169412893/lesbian-after-marriage-jennifer-baumgardner-takes

    DEBORAH ABBOTT WAS SOMEWHAT HAPPILY MARRIED to a nice man with whom she’d created two adorable sons before she realized that the intense rapport with her best friend, Rachel, was the first step toward love and “unbelievably thrilling” sex with women. After separating from her husband, she’d often laugh at her dueling identities. “I would be at the PTA meeting and people would assume that I was heterosexual,” says Abbott. “And then I’d be dancing at a club and people would be shocked to learn I had an ex-husband and kids!”

    Is there a gay man who would naturally (not repressing anything before) switch his sex orientation? Nah, such things don’t happen.

    As the Talmud (appropriate comment for this topic) says: Women are a different nation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. Kiza says:

    Just a quick comment – I know now, this author is a total certifiable incorrigible US imbecile. It is so hard to find anyone who is not a drooling imbecile in the declining shithole.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Have another look at your second sentence referring presumably to America with its more than 300 million inhabitants. What does it say about its writer? Perhaps that it is difficult to know when one might take seriously anyone who can blurt out anything so pointlessly silly. Worse than the daftest presidential tweet.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. @Corvinus
    "Oh yeah, those Hindus and Muslims are so honest and trustworthy."

    Generally, they exhibit those two traits.

    "PEOPLE in general are readily prone to evil, and it’s difficult to see how Christians are systematically worse than adherents of other religions."

    Corrected for accuracy --> People in general make choices that lead them to focus on being good or focus on being evil. Moreover, people in any and every religion abuse their Good Book and the word of God for their own designs.

    “With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”
    Steven Weinberg, quoted in The New York Times, April 20, 1999

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    “With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”

    There is definitively truth in this quotation when it comes to those who are devout and insist that 1) their religion is "better" or 2) more "truer" than other religions. OR, within a particular faith, you have significant disagreements over doctrine which leads to accusations of being a "heretic" or "going against the will of God".

    On the other hand, good people do evil things without religion playing any role.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. Corvinus says:
    @Carroll Price
    “With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”
    Steven Weinberg, quoted in The New York Times, April 20, 1999

    “With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”

    There is definitively truth in this quotation when it comes to those who are devout and insist that 1) their religion is “better” or 2) more “truer” than other religions. OR, within a particular faith, you have significant disagreements over doctrine which leads to accusations of being a “heretic” or “going against the will of God”.

    On the other hand, good people do evil things without religion playing any role.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price

    On the other hand, good people do evil things without religion playing any role.
     
    Re-read the quote. That's exactly what it says.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. @Svigor

    And, of course Fred is not completely accurate when he said that “Jews do not assimilate”.
     
    Well, they've been around for 3k years. Or just 2k, if you're only counting Talmud-Jews. Assimilation, that ain't.

    “David Goldman–Sadly, American Jews stand out as a horrible example of demographic failure. In the United States, secular and loosely affiliated American Jews, that is, the vast majority, have the lowest fertility rate of any identifiable segment of the American population. As I wrote in my book How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too):

    Nowhere is the fertility gap between religious and non-religious more extreme than among American Jews. As a group, American Jews show the lowest fertility of any ethnic group in the country. That is a matter of great anguish for Jewish community leaders. According to sociologist Steven Cohen, “We are now in the midst of a non-Orthodox Jewish population meltdown. … Among Jews in their 50s, for every 100 Orthodox adults, we have 192 Orthodox children. And for the non-Orthodox, for every 100 adults, we have merely 55 such children.”
     
    A Jew writing about Jews not breeding enough, and how up in arms Jews are about it, isn't what I'd call the American model of assimilation. Which group has the second lowest rate (not that Goldman knows, or gives a shit)? Are they bemoaning their low rate? How about the group with the third lowest rate - do they whine about the "silent holocaust"?

    I'm gonna go ahead and assume that the groups with the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc., lowest rates don't have any articles at that site, whining about it.

    That's telling, no?

    I would assume that the low birth rate among Jews is, at least partially, due to an unusually high percentage of male and female Jews being homosexual.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    They don't have a loe birth rate in Israel do they compared with eg. Italy, Spain snd Germany. BTW do those exsmples make you wonder about Catholic populations and the prevalence of homosexuality? Also since most homosexuality is probably at least partly genetic how come those huge pre 1900 Jewish families led to a current generation of homosexuals?
    , @Santoculto
    Ortodox jews have highest rates....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. @Corvinus
    “With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”

    There is definitively truth in this quotation when it comes to those who are devout and insist that 1) their religion is "better" or 2) more "truer" than other religions. OR, within a particular faith, you have significant disagreements over doctrine which leads to accusations of being a "heretic" or "going against the will of God".

    On the other hand, good people do evil things without religion playing any role.

    On the other hand, good people do evil things without religion playing any role.

    Re-read the quote. That’s exactly what it says.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    OK.

    Religion may or may not cause a person to be good or evil. Some people claim that religion is necessary for people to be good, and other people claim that religion is not necessary to be good.

    In addition, some people believe that because there is a deemphasis on religion there is evil, while other people believe that even if there was no religion at all, there still would be evil.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Kiza
    Just a quick comment - I know now, this author is a total certifiable incorrigible US imbecile. It is so hard to find anyone who is not a drooling imbecile in the declining shithole.

    Have another look at your second sentence referring presumably to America with its more than 300 million inhabitants. What does it say about its writer? Perhaps that it is difficult to know when one might take seriously anyone who can blurt out anything so pointlessly silly. Worse than the daftest presidential tweet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Truth says:
    @Santoculto
    Jews have ''excess'' of manly women and efeminate men, maybe partly because their higher verbal intelligence. Among non-jewish students and teachers of humanities & arts the same pattern is visible.

    Maybe, but they certainly have “excess” manly women and because so many of their daddy chopped their son’s balls off at birth and raised them as women, for power and influence.

    Been happening since the pyramids were built.

    Ecclesiastes 1:9

    The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    Truth, you are one strange fellow, do you know that?

    Are you our resident representative of the Five-Percent Nation?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Truth says:
    @Pat Kittle
    Can Fred really be this ignorant?

    I suspect not.

    LOL. Well he could be, but seeing as how he as been self-reliant for 70+ years, the odds are against it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    I personally rank Fred among the best writers of the day.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Carroll Price
    I would assume that the low birth rate among Jews is, at least partially, due to an unusually high percentage of male and female Jews being homosexual.

    They don’t have a loe birth rate in Israel do they compared with eg. Italy, Spain snd Germany. BTW do those exsmples make you wonder about Catholic populations and the prevalence of homosexuality? Also since most homosexuality is probably at least partly genetic how come those huge pre 1900 Jewish families led to a current generation of homosexuals?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
    Cross national studies of reported sexual orientation/behavior have found that Israelis are about three or four times as likely to report homosexual behavior an/or being homosexual as persons from other countries. Israeli Jews also play a major role in the international sex slave trade. I've noticed a pronounced tendency towards sexual kinks among Jews, particularly male Jews. Woody Allen and Roman Polanksi are illustrative instances not unusual exception. Perhaps this, like the high prevalence of Tay-Sachs and other like disorders among Jews is just an unfortunate side effect of selection for certain positive mental traits, e.g., exceptional verbal skill.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Corvinus says:
    @Carroll Price

    On the other hand, good people do evil things without religion playing any role.
     
    Re-read the quote. That's exactly what it says.

    OK.

    Religion may or may not cause a person to be good or evil. Some people claim that religion is necessary for people to be good, and other people claim that religion is not necessary to be good.

    In addition, some people believe that because there is a deemphasis on religion there is evil, while other people believe that even if there was no religion at all, there still would be evil.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    The gist of the quote is that it requires religion to make good people do evil things, an absolute fact that's easily observed in virtually all societies, from the present to the Maya, Aztec and other ancient societies that required the sacrifice of human being to appease the gods. As to the present, the quote is particularly applicable to the large numbers of Americans who call themselves Christians being in whole-hearted support of the US military slaying as many innocent victims in foreign countries as possible - with the more, the better.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. @Wally
    "Hitler murdered not only 6 million Jews but also at least 20 million Slavs — some of the latter in the very same extermination camps…"

    Except there is no such proof for either, and you certainly don't have it.
    All just empty Zionist propaganda.

    I also notice you dodged by posted information.


    The "Holocau$t Industry" in court:
    'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'
     
    www.codoh.com

    Jews have been pushing their fake '6,000,000 since at least 1823.

    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php
    http://balder.org/judea/billeder-judea/Scan-New-York-Times-Six-Million-Since-1869-Composite.jpg

    I dodge nothing, but on the other hand I notice that you are a fanatic. Discussing Hitler, Holocaust 1, Holocaust 2 (of the Slavs) or the JQ with you would be like trying to convince a Muslim that Muhammad did not quite leap on his horse to heaven, or trying to challenge a 15th century padre’s notions of the Holy Trinity. Happy hallucinations, my friend.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    Seeing that the accepted narrative of the Holocaust is more of a pseudo-religious than historically verifiable one, I would say that it is not Wally and his presentation of the evidence that is comparable to religious fanaticism but the faith based dogmatism of the "Church of the Shoah" that fits your analogies entirely.

    I notice that Reed referenced "Treblinka." The official narrative describes a mass murder at Treblinka II that involved somewhere between 700-800,000 Jews being murdered in diesel gas chambers , interred in gigantic mass graves. Subsequently, the bodies were exhumed and burnt to ashes on outdoor funeral pyres. There is not a single trace of physical or authentic documentary evidence that any such thing occurred there. The claim of gassing 800,000 people to death using non-lethal diesel exhaust and the utterly monumental logistics problem that the SS would have confronted by such a gigantic excavation, exhumation renders this just another absurd and surreal Yiddish calumny against the German people.

    , @Wally
    IOW, you do not have the proof I that requested.

    Indeed, I am a "fanatic" for the truth. Deal with it.

    www.codoh.com

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”

    - fake "holocaust historian" Raul Hilberg,
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. nickels says:

    Richie Allen today said that a number 1 rule of journalism is to not write about something you know nothing about.
    Now I see why.

    Read More
    • Agree: utu
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  140. Fred writes on personal experience:

    Chutzpah: When I was seven we lived in Arlington, Virginia, next to the Furmans, recently someone said, of Hell’s Kitchen, which I didn’t know what was. The Furmans were by no means bad people. One day Mrs. Furman came over and gave my mother a hard time because my little brother, five was playing with a kid across the street instead of little Andrew Furman. Mom had done nothing to influence my brother’s choice of friends. She, a quietly genteel woman from the Southside of Virginia, was horrified by the aggressiveness. She told me of this decades later, so it clearly made a bad impression.

    I don’t know Hebrew or Yiddish, but I doubt this is what “chutzpah” stands for. Mrs. Furman was, from what he writes, a pathetic figure worthy of pity. True, she was rude & perhaps hysterical.

    But this is a classic example of frustrated outsider who would like to fit in, an archetype of unhappy consciousness & enormous inferiority complex.

    Something completely opposite to arrogance & de haut en bas attitude.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    You're a smart guy.

    Surely you realize arrogance & insecurity are not mutually exclusive.
    , @utu
    Yes, Holocaust made Mrs. Furman this way. Arrogant and insecure at the same time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Svigor says:

    I would assume that the low birth rate among Jews is, at least partially, due to an unusually high percentage of male and female Jews being homosexual.

    I remember my dad telling, back in the late eighties, that a lot of Jews are homosexual. It does seem to be true today, but I have no idea if it’s “lot” enough to substantially impact their birth rates.

    Something completely opposite to arrogance & de haut en bas attitude.

    chutzpah.askdefine.com

    chutzpah n : (Yiddish) unbelievable gall; insolence; audacity [syn: chutzpa, hutzpah]

    Chutzpah != snobbishness.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
    Chutzpah is NOT snobbishness. It is unbelievable gall. The classic example is the man who murdered his parents and pleaded for mercy from the court because he was an orphan.
    , @utu
    I can give you a recent example of chutzpah. After young American Jew in Israel was identified as the one who made 100+ threats to Jewish centers, synagogs and organizations in the US over period of several months after Trump was elected and all Americans, particularly whites and supporters of Trump were presumed to be responsible for the raising wave of anti-Semitism, Jewish media said: Never mind. It is irrelevant that the guy was Jewish. The threats were anti-Semitic nonetheless. Jews were victimized.

    What is the worst that nobody called them on it and nobody dared in MSM to call it by its name, i.e., the anti-semitic hoax perpetrated by a Jew to libel gentiles.

    The chutzpah would not exist if it did not work. And why does it work? It does not work on Jews because they are not polite to each other. But it works on gentiles because of gentile's politeness. There is no polite defense against impudence and gall.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Svigor says:

    Daniel le mouche, you’re very welcome; thanks for the kind word Daniel, Joe.

    For one who usually doesn’t read his stuff, you sure do go on about it. And on and on and on.

    So, you’re saying you read all my stuff? :D

    Yes, if Fred’s gonna put “Jew” in the title, I’m gonna read it. I slogged through his rambling, so I don’t mind returning the favor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  143. Svigor says:

    Everything Jews preach outside of Israel (diversity, open borders, unrestricted immigration, etc.) is the exact opposite of what Jews practice in Israel itself.

    Ever had a go at Zionists? They will tell you how “diverse” Israel is and show you a picture with a black guy in it, like it makes Israel more than .5% black, lol.

    Zionists love pretending Israel is “diverse.” “Levantine, Levantine, Levantine, Levantine, and Levantine! See, goy? Diverse!” he says, to the goy who just had fifty Jews shouting at him that French + Italian + Russian != diverse.

    like trying to convince a Muslim that Muhammad did not quite leap on his horse to heaven

    Donkey. IIRC, it was a donkey.

    I dodge nothing, but on the other hand I notice that you are a fanatic. Discussing Hitler, Holocaust 1, Holocaust 2 (of the Slavs) or the JQ with you would be like trying to convince a Muslim that Muhammad did not quite leap on his horse to heaven, or trying to challenge a 15th century padre’s notions of the Holy Trinity. Happy hallucinations, my friend.

    Or a Jew that there’s no evidence for the gas chambers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  144. @Corvinus
    OK.

    Religion may or may not cause a person to be good or evil. Some people claim that religion is necessary for people to be good, and other people claim that religion is not necessary to be good.

    In addition, some people believe that because there is a deemphasis on religion there is evil, while other people believe that even if there was no religion at all, there still would be evil.

    The gist of the quote is that it requires religion to make good people do evil things, an absolute fact that’s easily observed in virtually all societies, from the present to the Maya, Aztec and other ancient societies that required the sacrifice of human being to appease the gods. As to the present, the quote is particularly applicable to the large numbers of Americans who call themselves Christians being in whole-hearted support of the US military slaying as many innocent victims in foreign countries as possible – with the more, the better.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The gist of the quote is that it requires religion to make good people do evil things, an absolute fact that’s easily observed in virtually all societies, from the present to the Maya, Aztec and other ancient societies that required the sacrifice of human being to appease the gods."

    Actually, religion COULD or MAY make good people do evil things. So your assertion that of absolute fact is other than accurate. Furthermore, the sacrifice of human beings to appease the Gods was not considered "evil" to them in the cultures you listed. From our perspective, and in retrospect, it is deemed as "evil".

    "As to the present, the quote is particularly applicable to the large numbers of Americans who call themselves Christians being in whole-hearted support of the US military slaying as many innocent victims in foreign countries as possible – with the more, the better."

    The Americans who "call themselves Christians" are Christians. If you doubt their faith, you will certainly have to do more than merely call out those who support the American armed forces and their duty to carry out foreign policy initiatives. In some cases, absolutely, there have been innocent people who have died as a result of our "meddling". But in a number of cases, the Just War Theory applied, and so the casualties were not considered as "victims" or "innocent" in that context. Certainly, one could make a reasonable argument that this theory was inappropriately employed, or that American foreign policy objectives in and of themselves are immoral. But those designations mandate thoughtful analysis.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. @Bardon Kaldian
    Fred writes on personal experience:

    Chutzpah: When I was seven we lived in Arlington, Virginia, next to the Furmans, recently someone said, of Hell’s Kitchen, which I didn’t know what was. The Furmans were by no means bad people. One day Mrs. Furman came over and gave my mother a hard time because my little brother, five was playing with a kid across the street instead of little Andrew Furman. Mom had done nothing to influence my brother’s choice of friends. She, a quietly genteel woman from the Southside of Virginia, was horrified by the aggressiveness. She told me of this decades later, so it clearly made a bad impression.
     
    I don't know Hebrew or Yiddish, but I doubt this is what "chutzpah" stands for. Mrs. Furman was, from what he writes, a pathetic figure worthy of pity. True, she was rude & perhaps hysterical.

    But this is a classic example of frustrated outsider who would like to fit in, an archetype of unhappy consciousness & enormous inferiority complex.

    Something completely opposite to arrogance & de haut en bas attitude.

    You’re a smart guy.

    Surely you realize arrogance & insecurity are not mutually exclusive.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    What Fred writes about is not arrogance stemming from superciliousness or a superiority complex; it is a glaring example of compensatory aggressive behavior rooted in the sense of inferiority & insecurity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @Truth
    LOL. Well he could be, but seeing as how he as been self-reliant for 70+ years, the odds are against it.

    I personally rank Fred among the best writers of the day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I would assume that he appreciates that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. @Pat Kittle
    You're a smart guy.

    Surely you realize arrogance & insecurity are not mutually exclusive.

    What Fred writes about is not arrogance stemming from superciliousness or a superiority complex; it is a glaring example of compensatory aggressive behavior rooted in the sense of inferiority & insecurity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. @Anon
    They don't have a loe birth rate in Israel do they compared with eg. Italy, Spain snd Germany. BTW do those exsmples make you wonder about Catholic populations and the prevalence of homosexuality? Also since most homosexuality is probably at least partly genetic how come those huge pre 1900 Jewish families led to a current generation of homosexuals?

    Cross national studies of reported sexual orientation/behavior have found that Israelis are about three or four times as likely to report homosexual behavior an/or being homosexual as persons from other countries. Israeli Jews also play a major role in the international sex slave trade. I’ve noticed a pronounced tendency towards sexual kinks among Jews, particularly male Jews. Woody Allen and Roman Polanksi are illustrative instances not unusual exception. Perhaps this, like the high prevalence of Tay-Sachs and other like disorders among Jews is just an unfortunate side effect of selection for certain positive mental traits, e.g., exceptional verbal skill.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    That speculation - extension of the Harpending/Cochran ideas about Ashkenazi neurology - is interesting. I wonder if Greg C might comment.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Svigor

    I would assume that the low birth rate among Jews is, at least partially, due to an unusually high percentage of male and female Jews being homosexual.
     
    I remember my dad telling, back in the late eighties, that a lot of Jews are homosexual. It does seem to be true today, but I have no idea if it's "lot" enough to substantially impact their birth rates.

    Something completely opposite to arrogance & de haut en bas attitude.
     
    chutzpah.askdefine.com

    chutzpah n : (Yiddish) unbelievable gall; insolence; audacity [syn: chutzpa, hutzpah]

    Chutzpah != snobbishness.

    Chutzpah is NOT snobbishness. It is unbelievable gall. The classic example is the man who murdered his parents and pleaded for mercy from the court because he was an orphan.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Svigor says:

    What Fred writes about is not arrogance stemming from superciliousness or a superiority complex; it is a glaring example of compensatory aggressive behavior rooted in the sense of inferiority & insecurity.

    http://chutzpah.askdefine.com/

    chutzpah n : (Yiddish) unbelievable gall; insolence; audacity [syn: chutzpa, hutzpah]

    E.g., demanding your kid play with my kid.

    E.g., making the Jewish aggressor into the victim (compensatory aggressive behavior rooted in the sense of inferiority & insecurity).

    Chutzpah doesn’t seem to have died down in majority-Jewish Israel. If we buy your argument, it’s reasonable to assume there are no conditions under which Jews don’t feel inferior & insecure, aren’t marked by chutzpah.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  151. Mulegino1 says:

    “To make the history of antisemitism complete, omitting none of the manifestations of this sentiment and following its divers phases and modifications, it is necessary to go into the history of Israel since its dispersion, or, more properly speaking, since the beginning of its expansion beyond the boundaries of Palestine.”

    “Wherever the Jews settled after ceasing to be a nation ready to defend its liberty and independence, one observes the development of antisemitism, or rather anti-Judaism; for antisemitism is an ill chosen word, which has its raison d’etre only in our day, when it is sought to broaden this strife between the Jew and the Christians by supplying it with a philosophy and a metaphysical, rather than a material reason. If this hostility, this repugnance had been shown towards the Jews at one time or in one country only, it would be easy to account for the local causes of this sentiment. But this race has been the object of hatred with all the nations amidst whom it ever settled. Inasmuch as the enemies of the Jews belonged to divers races, as they dwelled far apart from one another, were ruled by different laws and governed by opposite principles; as they had not the same customs and differed in spirit from one another, so that they could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it must needs be that the general causes of antisemitism have always resided in Israel itself, and not in those who antagonized it.”

    “This does not mean that justice was always on the side of Israel’s persecutors, or that they did not indulge in all the extremes born of hatred; it is merely asserted that the Jews were themselves, in part, at least, the cause of their own ills.”

    “Considering the unanimity of antisemitic manifestations, it can hardly be admitted, as had too willingly been done, that they were merely due to a religious war, and one must not view the strife against the Jews as a struggle of polytheism against monotheism, or that of the Trinity against Jehovah. The polytheistic, as well as the Christian nations combated not the doctrine of one sole God, but the Jew.”

    “Which virtues or which vices have earned for the Jew this universal enmity? Why was he ill-treated and hated alike and in turn by the Alexandrians and the Romans, by the Persians and the Arabs, by the Turks and the Christian nations ? Because, everywhere up to our own days the Jew was an unsociable being.”

    Bernard Lazare, Jew, Proto-Zionist, in “Antisemitism: Its History and Causes”

    In other words, anti-Jewish sentiment is justified as its root cause is, for the most part, the behavior of the Jews themselves. Lazare ought to be credited for his remarkable candor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  152. I never had an opinion on Jews and was skeptical about the widespread dislike of them… until I got into a business where I had to deal with Jews on a daily basis. Now I dislike them intensely. Jews are the worst people to do business with. I have found it impossible to develop a normal give-and-take business relationship with any of them. Everything occurs on their terms or not at all. They understand and seek only a master/servant relationship and if you will not bow they will use every power they have to punish you. If at any time your business becomes a threat to that of a Jew they will all instantly conspire against you. They are shameless in their manipulations and their greed is breathtaking. I now have little doubt that much of what is said of their broader manipulations is true.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  153. Mulegino1 says:
    @Max Denken
    I dodge nothing, but on the other hand I notice that you are a fanatic. Discussing Hitler, Holocaust 1, Holocaust 2 (of the Slavs) or the JQ with you would be like trying to convince a Muslim that Muhammad did not quite leap on his horse to heaven, or trying to challenge a 15th century padre's notions of the Holy Trinity. Happy hallucinations, my friend.

    Seeing that the accepted narrative of the Holocaust is more of a pseudo-religious than historically verifiable one, I would say that it is not Wally and his presentation of the evidence that is comparable to religious fanaticism but the faith based dogmatism of the “Church of the Shoah” that fits your analogies entirely.

    I notice that Reed referenced “Treblinka.” The official narrative describes a mass murder at Treblinka II that involved somewhere between 700-800,000 Jews being murdered in diesel gas chambers , interred in gigantic mass graves. Subsequently, the bodies were exhumed and burnt to ashes on outdoor funeral pyres. There is not a single trace of physical or authentic documentary evidence that any such thing occurred there. The claim of gassing 800,000 people to death using non-lethal diesel exhaust and the utterly monumental logistics problem that the SS would have confronted by such a gigantic excavation, exhumation renders this just another absurd and surreal Yiddish calumny against the German people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Max Denken
    The trouble with all of you, true believers, is that you are ignorant not only of the mountain of evidence in English and another one in pictures, but are linguistically ignorant as well. For additional mountains of evidence exist in Polish, compiled by the Poles, and in Czech compiled by the Czechs, and in Serbian compiled by the Serbs, and in Russians compiled by the Russians -- and those peoples are hardly philosemitic...
    There are many millions of authentic words there, thousands of document facsimiles, thousands more pix... but since you can't read it, you deny it exists...
    A little sampler:
    Polish: http://www.wikiwand.com/pl/%C5%81apanka
    Polish: 28 web pages in just one category of German crimes against the Polish people
    Polish (and not Jewish): Majdanek http://www.majdanek.eu/en/history
    Polish (and not Jewish): Treblinka http://www.treblinka-muzeum.eu/
    Czech: Lidice: http://www.lidice-memorial.cz/en/

    English+pix: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2204160/Darkest-atrocities-Nazis-laid-bare-secretly-recorded-conversations-German-prisoners-war.html#ixzz3n6ZlCXOe
    English: http://www.pacwashmetrodiv.org/events/holoc04/moor-jankowski.htm
    A few pix for your conniptions as to how they were faked: https://www.private-prague-guide.com/article/life-during-the-nazi-occupation/

    This concludes my participation in the discussion of this subject. As I mentioned, I have no time to waste on arguing with fanatics the subjects of their fanaticism. Believe as you will.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. Corvinus says:
    @Carroll Price
    The gist of the quote is that it requires religion to make good people do evil things, an absolute fact that's easily observed in virtually all societies, from the present to the Maya, Aztec and other ancient societies that required the sacrifice of human being to appease the gods. As to the present, the quote is particularly applicable to the large numbers of Americans who call themselves Christians being in whole-hearted support of the US military slaying as many innocent victims in foreign countries as possible - with the more, the better.

    “The gist of the quote is that it requires religion to make good people do evil things, an absolute fact that’s easily observed in virtually all societies, from the present to the Maya, Aztec and other ancient societies that required the sacrifice of human being to appease the gods.”

    Actually, religion COULD or MAY make good people do evil things. So your assertion that of absolute fact is other than accurate. Furthermore, the sacrifice of human beings to appease the Gods was not considered “evil” to them in the cultures you listed. From our perspective, and in retrospect, it is deemed as “evil”.

    “As to the present, the quote is particularly applicable to the large numbers of Americans who call themselves Christians being in whole-hearted support of the US military slaying as many innocent victims in foreign countries as possible – with the more, the better.”

    The Americans who “call themselves Christians” are Christians. If you doubt their faith, you will certainly have to do more than merely call out those who support the American armed forces and their duty to carry out foreign policy initiatives. In some cases, absolutely, there have been innocent people who have died as a result of our “meddling”. But in a number of cases, the Just War Theory applied, and so the casualties were not considered as “victims” or “innocent” in that context. Certainly, one could make a reasonable argument that this theory was inappropriately employed, or that American foreign policy objectives in and of themselves are immoral. But those designations mandate thoughtful analysis.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    By the stretch of anyone's imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    Cuck.
    , @anonymous

    In some cases, absolutely, there have been innocent people who have died as a result of our “meddling”. But in a number of cases, the Just War Theory applied, and so the casualties were not considered as “victims” or “innocent” in that context.
     
    You black-hearted sir have won a grand prize.

    Please move forward, and collect the ticket the devil has for you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. @Bay Area Guy
    As Fred hinted, Jews prize their ethnic identity much more than most whites. For example, while Italian and Greek Americans may pay homage to their respective identities, they don't wear them on their sleeves. They certainly wouldn't describe an Italian marrying a Greek as "intermarriage," a few potential exceptions notwithstanding.

    Of course, Jews bragging about their success doesn't help either. Chinese and other Asian Americans - while not wielding the political and cultural clout of Jews - are also very economically successful; but they at least have the wisdom to keep quiet about it, as evidenced by their strident rejection of the "model minority" stereotype. Successful minorities worldwide such as Bohras in India also manage to quietly enjoy their success; and that's saying something, given that India is an openly - and often violently - majoritarian country.

    Ultimately, I think that Jews' chutzpah engenders a lot of ill will. Of all affluent and accomplished minorities, they're certainly the most flamboyant and pushy.

    Perhaps you are pointing to one more oddity of the Bay area, Bay Area Guy, but Greeks elsewhere
    in America wear Greekness on their sleeves. Maybe you don’t get around much.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bay Area Guy
    I do get around, but not nearly as much as I would like. I admit I am mostly confined to the Bay Area, where whites' different ethnicities don't matter - except for Jews; and in many ways, that proves my point. Since Jews here retain their ethnic identity while all other whites are merely white, that demonstrates how enduring Jewish identity really is.
    , @Josecanuc
    April, 1935:
    A.N. Whitehead: “About our discussion of Hellenism and Hebraism...I have been studying for years the relationship of those two main forces in Western civilization, and you are one of the few person who would be of any value to me. You have read the books and done the thinking. The Jews as a race are probably the most able of any in existence. Now when a gifted person is charming and uses his exceptional ability generously, he is a paragon and people adore him; but in the same way, if a person with unusual ability is disagreeable, his ability makes him just so much the more disagreeable, and thus the disagreeable individuals in that race are the more conspicuous. The Jews had originally a barbaric morality which was gradually undergoing humanization at the hands of their finer spirits.. the Jews, looking around them, saw always an Oriental despot, and so, looking over the world at large, thought there must be a despot over all, and the consequence was they conceived one of the most immoral Gods ever imagined. Fancy Jehovah telling Abraham to sacrifice his son! The Jews had certain moral ideas but these would not have come to much without the Greeks.”
    Lucien Price: “What would you say was the contribution of the Greeks?”
    Whitehead: “The aesthetic view of life.”
    Price: “I noticed when you use those two words, aesthetics and morals in connection with Hellas and Israel, that aesthetics came first.”
    Whitehead: “Properly so.”
    Price: “Is Beauty a wider and more fundamental notion than truth?”
    Whitehead: “Yes. Apart from beauty, truth is neither good nor bad....That is how the Puritans (Jews) tumbled overboard. They cast out beauty. They began well, by believing they were made in the image of God. They ended by making God in their own image.”
    Price: “The Old Testament and the Homeric poems are both 'traditional books,' taking centuries to grow. In their editing, the one by the ancient Hebrews, the other by the ancient Greeks, how characteristic the differences of method and spirit are of the two people: one produced a manual of morals; the other, a work of art.”
    Whitehead: “The Hebrews had a most intense ethical perception though within a very limited range. It is 'the beauty of holiness.' In that, no one else approaches them, but the range is barrow.”
    Price: “How unique the Hebrew genius is. It was profoundly moral. The Hebrews were one of the most remarkable peoples that ever lived. And yet I don't think I would have cared to live among them. The Greeks were more reasonable.”
    DIALOGUES OF ALFRED NORTH WHITEHEAD As Recorded by LUCIEN PRICE, Greenwood Press, 1954
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. @Mario964
    Mr. Reed why are you rumbling on such a sensitive subject while you don't know anything about it?

    Quote:
    The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” -Baruch Levy, 1879.

    Quote:
    “Give me control of a nations currency and I care not who makes its laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild

    In order to learn something about a subject that you are dealing with without knowing what you are talking about I kindly advise you to watch this video:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cePM18Yvp8
    You will then learn what kind of weltanschauung has been at the root of Judaism throughout the millennia till today when it comes to dealing with the goyim. Please note that the man exposing such outstanding criminal racism against all non-Jew is a highly respected and authoritative Rabbi David Bar-Hayim, the head of a rabbinical court and an institute in Jerusalem for teaching the Torah.
    You will then "discover" that the Torah teaches that in the eyes of God the life of a Jew is more precious that the life of a non-Jew because God has expressly declared that Jews are above all other (sub)human beings, therefore affirming that all humans are equal in front of God is anathema [which BTW explains the visceral hate of the Jews against Christianity since the coming of Jesus Christ till today]. You will also learn that the best of non-Jews should be killed in warfare, because a non-Jew is like a snake that is better dead than alive and the Christians particularly so because they are guilty of
    Avodah Zarah, i.e. idolatry, the uppermost capital offence deserving the death penalty.
    There are more jewels: it is permissible to break the sabbath in order to save a Jew in danger but not to save a non-Jew in danger because all lives are not equal, neither should a Jew return to a non-Jew something that he has lost.
    To make it short: hateful racism against all non-Jew is a God sanctioned duty since the beginning of time! And this is particularly compelling when it comes to Christians, the uppermost enemies of the Jews.

    I kindly advise you to change the pompous name of your blog from Fred on everything to Fred on everything including what I don't know anything about.

    The quote attributed to “Baruch Levy” is fake. It comes from a 1928 French article on “The secret origins of Bolshevism” (quote), was immediately protested as fake, but still circulates, with contemporary upgrades like the substitution of “new world order” for “universal republic”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mario964
    No other people in this world has attained supreme mastery of denial of truth and responsibility as the Jews. Nobody should forget that “chutzpah” is a Yiddish word: i.e "that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan". (Wikipedia > Chutzpah)

    To confirm Baruch Levy's weltanschauung please see the following quote of an utterance by highly revered rabbi Ovadia Yosef during his weekly Saturday night sermon in August 2000 from authoritative newspaper The Times Of Israel:

    The purpose of Gentiles — to serve Jews:

    “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.”

    “In Israel, death has no dominion over them… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.

    “This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew.”

    “Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created.”

    — Weekly Saturday night sermon in October 2010
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/5-of-ovadia-yosefs-most-controversial-quotations/
    Doesn't it sound familiar?

    From Wikipedia > Ovadia Yosef:
    His funeral in Jerusalem was the largest in Israel's history, with an estimated attendance of 850,000. Some religious authorities have stated that this was, perhaps, the largest in-gathering of Jews since the days of the Second Temple. Lev, David (7 October 2013). "Police: Rabbi Yosef's Funeral Largest in Israel's History" - Israel National News.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. @gsjackson
    I believe Sotomayor is half Jewish.

    Many commentators, including Jewish ones, speculate that Justice Sotomayor, a Bronx Puerto Rican,
    is in fact a descendant of Spanish conversos (aka Maranos), Jews who outwardly converted to satisfy
    Ferdinand and Isabella but continued to practice the Jewish religion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. @Jus' Sayin'...
    Cross national studies of reported sexual orientation/behavior have found that Israelis are about three or four times as likely to report homosexual behavior an/or being homosexual as persons from other countries. Israeli Jews also play a major role in the international sex slave trade. I've noticed a pronounced tendency towards sexual kinks among Jews, particularly male Jews. Woody Allen and Roman Polanksi are illustrative instances not unusual exception. Perhaps this, like the high prevalence of Tay-Sachs and other like disorders among Jews is just an unfortunate side effect of selection for certain positive mental traits, e.g., exceptional verbal skill.

    That speculation – extension of the Harpending/Cochran ideas about Ashkenazi neurology – is interesting. I wonder if Greg C might comment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. Truth says:
    @Carroll Price
    I personally rank Fred among the best writers of the day.

    I would assume that he appreciates that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. @Wally
    "Hitler murdered not only 6 million Jews but also at least 20 million Slavs — some of the latter in the very same extermination camps…"

    Except there is no such proof for either, and you certainly don't have it.
    All just empty Zionist propaganda.

    I also notice you dodged by posted information.


    The "Holocau$t Industry" in court:
    'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'
     
    www.codoh.com

    Jews have been pushing their fake '6,000,000 since at least 1823.

    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php
    http://balder.org/judea/billeder-judea/Scan-New-York-Times-Six-Million-Since-1869-Composite.jpg

    Wally – you’ll be glad to know that some French documentary makers in 2015 made a film which I saw on Australia’s Foxtel ‘s History Channel called approx. The Secret History of WW2 Ep 5 The Holocaust which will update your knowledge of something you care passionately about.

    I criticise it for saying weakly near the end that the Allied bombing of chemical plants not far from Auschwicz showed that they could have taken out the gas chambers when the most credible experts had already explained why neither bombing the railways nor attempting precision bombing would be a realistic option.

    You will enjoy just one thing and that is my second criticism. After more that once referring to the 3.5 to 4 million Jews the Nazis explicitly aimed to eliminate out of Europe’s 11 million Jews it stated without elaboration near the end that 6 million Jews were murdered.

    That’s the end of the joy for you because what has now been given air is all the information that was being given to the Allies, and its sources, from 1940 or 41 onwards.

    In late 1941 when he could do nothing about it Churchill received information from Enigma intercepts/transcripts that Jews were being murdered in the Soviet Union by shootings of thousands at a time (eventually amounting to about 1 million) and this was undeniable because it was from German supposedly secret communications.

    Then Witold Pilecki ( see Wikipedia entry if you haven’t heard of him) began the process of getting precise information out of Auschwicz to the Polish Government in exile in London which of course was passed on to the major Allies. He had deliberately had himself arrested so he could join resistance people already in Auschwicz in 1940 with a view to organising a revolt, which proved impossible. His first communication of the reality, including the gas chambers, was in 1942 via the amazing escape of four Poles in a German car through the front gate. One, who died last year at the age of 98 was interviewed. His name, qv, was Kazimierz Piechowski.

    Later Pilecki escaped and survived the Warsaw uprising (but executed in 1949 by the Communists). His reports were shown so that, if one could read Polish, what was being narrated could be verified or falsified.

    But then the big one, who had to escape Germany in 1943 from which he went to Zurich and married his Jewish mistress. He was Eduard Schulte, an important German industrialist doing well financially out of the war it seems but secretly, as an upper class German, despising Hitler and the Nazis. He apparently got some of the earliest warnings about a deliberate extermination of the Jews out to the Allies via a Jewish banker in Zurich who promised not to reveal his name. A couple of historians were featured saying that research which eventually disclosed Schulte as the main reliable inside source of information was amongst their most satisfying, partly it seems because so difficult. But not in doubt.

    So, what do you make of this contemporaneous information about the carefully, euphemistically, described deliberate Final Solution to the Jewish Question? No, don’t answer for a while. Consider.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    Wally's response would probably be similar to my own, which would be a request that you produce evidence of mass execution of Jews occurring at any of the work camps. Along with evidence that any Final Solution to the Jewish question ever existed anywhere other than in the minds of Jews who to this day are obsessed with the idea of making billions from an imaginary event that obviously never occurred.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Correction: The film is called "The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust
    , @Zumbuddi
    Moron alert.

    "I saw it on TV and teevee never lies."
    , @Wally
    The "Holocau$t Industry" in court:
    'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'

    "I owe my permission to submit the Zionist plan for the final solution of the Jewish Question."
    - 'a founding father of Zionism', Theodor Herzl, letter to the Czar, November 22, 1899.
     
    Not a single British Bletchley Park intercept of secret German messages to and from Auschwitz and the so called 'death camps' never mention gas chambers, killing Jews, or anything holocaust-like. There are many which do mention transporting Jews out of these labor camps.
    Also note that the outbound train records which were kept have disappeared while the inbound records have not. Who benefits?

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/ww2decrypts.html
    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7581

    www.codoh.com
    , @utu
    Witold Pilecki wrote one short report in 1943 after he escaped from Auschwitz and one longer report in 1945 in Italy. In both reports gassings are mentioned. In the first one he writes about "experimental" gassing of Red Army officers in Block 11 in 1941 before Birkenau (Auschwitz II) was built. Gassings are mentioned as a matter of fact here and but are not the main part of the report which feels strange to us now.

    Did the first report make it to UK? If it did nobody made much of it. The reports were know to communists authorities after the war in Poland after he was arrested but it seems that they never were publicized until recently. It would be interesting to find out whether original manuscripts survived?

    I have read several memoirs by Auschwitz prisoners, some written already in 1945 and 1946. The gassings stories are there but what struck me that the sense of outrage is somewhat missing. Sometimes they make more out of cremation as cremation was novelty and against religion of Catholics and Orthodox Christians. In Greece just few years ago they finally managed to pass the law legalizing cremation. Why gassings did not outrage people there? Because people were killed in many ways there. And before WWII everybody believed that gas will be used in the next war. Almost everybody in Germany for Poland had a gas mask. The first gassings in Auschwitz were not of Jews. It was perceived as euthanasia of terminally sick or hopeless cases of Muselmann.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. @Mulegino1
    Seeing that the accepted narrative of the Holocaust is more of a pseudo-religious than historically verifiable one, I would say that it is not Wally and his presentation of the evidence that is comparable to religious fanaticism but the faith based dogmatism of the "Church of the Shoah" that fits your analogies entirely.

    I notice that Reed referenced "Treblinka." The official narrative describes a mass murder at Treblinka II that involved somewhere between 700-800,000 Jews being murdered in diesel gas chambers , interred in gigantic mass graves. Subsequently, the bodies were exhumed and burnt to ashes on outdoor funeral pyres. There is not a single trace of physical or authentic documentary evidence that any such thing occurred there. The claim of gassing 800,000 people to death using non-lethal diesel exhaust and the utterly monumental logistics problem that the SS would have confronted by such a gigantic excavation, exhumation renders this just another absurd and surreal Yiddish calumny against the German people.

    The trouble with all of you, true believers, is that you are ignorant not only of the mountain of evidence in English and another one in pictures, but are linguistically ignorant as well. For additional mountains of evidence exist in Polish, compiled by the Poles, and in Czech compiled by the Czechs, and in Serbian compiled by the Serbs, and in Russians compiled by the Russians — and those peoples are hardly philosemitic…
    There are many millions of authentic words there, thousands of document facsimiles, thousands more pix… but since you can’t read it, you deny it exists…
    A little sampler:
    Polish: http://www.wikiwand.com/pl/%C5%81apanka
    Polish: 28 web pages in just one category of German crimes against the Polish people
    Polish (and not Jewish): Majdanek http://www.majdanek.eu/en/history
    Polish (and not Jewish): Treblinka http://www.treblinka-muzeum.eu/
    Czech: Lidice: http://www.lidice-memorial.cz/en/

    English+pix: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2204160/Darkest-atrocities-Nazis-laid-bare-secretly-recorded-conversations-German-prisoners-war.html#ixzz3n6ZlCXOe
    English: http://www.pacwashmetrodiv.org/events/holoc04/moor-jankowski.htm
    A few pix for your conniptions as to how they were faked: https://www.private-prague-guide.com/article/life-during-the-nazi-occupation/

    This concludes my participation in the discussion of this subject. As I mentioned, I have no time to waste on arguing with fanatics the subjects of their fanaticism. Believe as you will.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Aww, don’t go.
    , @Mulegino1
    It is you Holohoaxers who are the "true believers." I notice you did not address a single point I made about Treblinka II.

    Every time anyone questions one aspect of the official narrative, say, the alleged "homicidal gas chambers of Birkenau" and brings forth proof that they did not exist, such as chemical analyses of the brickwork or the technical absurdity of the alleged method of execution, one is met by such a barrage of nonsense and propaganda.
    , @Wally
    Wow, you post links to laughable tall tales which have already been easily utterly debunked but are too dumb to realize it.
    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    And of course you ignore the mountain of debunking information I presented. You are truly in denial of science.
    ex.
    Your mentioned Majdanek: http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DT/gcturen.html
    U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays standard German air-raid shelter door, describing it as the door to a gas chamber at Majdanek

    - If there was ‘a plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ as alleged, then why are there countless numbers of so called “survivor$"?

    - If the alleged ‘holocaust’ was fact, then why are there laws in Europe to prevent scrutiny of it? What kind of “truth” needs to imprison people to prevent free speech?

    - If Jews are so sure that millions of Jews were murdered, then why do they ask such dumb questions like "what happened to them then?

    - Why transport Jews away from allegedly functioning "death camps" and then allegedly go to the huge war time expense & effort to ship them elsewhere just to kill them? A truly ridiculous claim.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. pyrrhus says:
    @Anonymous
    People don't like Jews because Jews don't practice the Golden Rule of treating others as they would like to be treated themselves. Instead they force goyim to live by certain rules that Jews themselves would never follow such as political correctness, immigration, assimilation, the list goes on and on.

    Jews are power hungry. They have a winner take all view on life where you are on top or you are a lowly goyim.

    Jews are very subversive taking part in clannish divide and conquer to get power.

    Jews are perverts. They rule the porn industry and look at how they wield power in Hollywood raping all the time.

    The problems are twofold: that most Jews have divided loyalties, of which the loyalty to Israel and their ethnicity generally reigns supreme.A man cannot serve two masters. Hence Israel can have 3 walls and reject any immigrants, but America can’t do the same; and second, that Jews do not have the same ethical standards regarding the goyim, whom they regard as chumps to be fleeced, as the goyim have toward them. A subset of that fact is that Jews are highly nepotistic toward their ethnicity, yet scream anti-semitism anytime they don’t get preferred treatment.
    There are obviously a fair number of exceptions, but the overall effect is of a parasite gnawing its way through American society.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymouse
    "A subset of that fact is that Jews are highly nepotistic toward their ethnicity"

    1) I'm 84, a jew. I have never experienced preference from other jews because I am jewish or seen preference by jews towards another because he/she was jewish. I rack my brains, I have never seen it happen or able to infer such a presumably hidden transaction indirectly.

    2) How would this non-jewish commenter conceivably know of such transactions presumably hidden from view? Either he has magical powers of observation or he is seeing a chimera.

    , @Josecanuc
    "There are obviously a fair number of exceptions, but the overall effect is of a parasite gnawing its way through American society."

    "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."
    —Netanyahu, the prime minister of "Israel" to Jonathan Pollard upon exiting Pollard's jail cell., [1]
    http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Netanyahu
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. @Corvinus
    "The gist of the quote is that it requires religion to make good people do evil things, an absolute fact that’s easily observed in virtually all societies, from the present to the Maya, Aztec and other ancient societies that required the sacrifice of human being to appease the gods."

    Actually, religion COULD or MAY make good people do evil things. So your assertion that of absolute fact is other than accurate. Furthermore, the sacrifice of human beings to appease the Gods was not considered "evil" to them in the cultures you listed. From our perspective, and in retrospect, it is deemed as "evil".

    "As to the present, the quote is particularly applicable to the large numbers of Americans who call themselves Christians being in whole-hearted support of the US military slaying as many innocent victims in foreign countries as possible – with the more, the better."

    The Americans who "call themselves Christians" are Christians. If you doubt their faith, you will certainly have to do more than merely call out those who support the American armed forces and their duty to carry out foreign policy initiatives. In some cases, absolutely, there have been innocent people who have died as a result of our "meddling". But in a number of cases, the Just War Theory applied, and so the casualties were not considered as "victims" or "innocent" in that context. Certainly, one could make a reasonable argument that this theory was inappropriately employed, or that American foreign policy objectives in and of themselves are immoral. But those designations mandate thoughtful analysis.

    By the stretch of anyone’s imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Took the words right out of my mouth, CP.
    , @Rex Little

    By the stretch of anyone’s imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?
     
    I'd say the attack on Afghanistan was justified if in fact the Taliban was giving shelter to Al-Qaeda as was alleged. But once they were taken out, we should have left them with a warning that we'd be back if anything like that happened again.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2 (Japan attacked, Germany declared war against us) and the War of 1812 (Britain invaded).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. @Wizard of Oz
    Wally - you'll be glad to know that some French documentary makers in 2015 made a film which I saw on Australia's Foxtel 's History Channel called approx. The Secret History of WW2 Ep 5 The Holocaust which will update your knowledge of something you care passionately about.

    I criticise it for saying weakly near the end that the Allied bombing of chemical plants not far from Auschwicz showed that they could have taken out the gas chambers when the most credible experts had already explained why neither bombing the railways nor attempting precision bombing would be a realistic option.

    You will enjoy just one thing and that is my second criticism. After more that once referring to the 3.5 to 4 million Jews the Nazis explicitly aimed to eliminate out of Europe's 11 million Jews it stated without elaboration near the end that 6 million Jews were murdered.

    That's the end of the joy for you because what has now been given air is all the information that was being given to the Allies, and its sources, from 1940 or 41 onwards.

    In late 1941 when he could do nothing about it Churchill received information from Enigma intercepts/transcripts that Jews were being murdered in the Soviet Union by shootings of thousands at a time (eventually amounting to about 1 million) and this was undeniable because it was from German supposedly secret communications.

    Then Witold Pilecki ( see Wikipedia entry if you haven't heard of him) began the process of getting precise information out of Auschwicz to the Polish Government in exile in London which of course was passed on to the major Allies. He had deliberately had himself arrested so he could join resistance people already in Auschwicz in 1940 with a view to organising a revolt, which proved impossible. His first communication of the reality, including the gas chambers, was in 1942 via the amazing escape of four Poles in a German car through the front gate. One, who died last year at the age of 98 was interviewed. His name, qv, was Kazimierz Piechowski.

    Later Pilecki escaped and survived the Warsaw uprising (but executed in 1949 by the Communists). His reports were shown so that, if one could read Polish, what was being narrated could be verified or falsified.

    But then the big one, who had to escape Germany in 1943 from which he went to Zurich and married his Jewish mistress. He was Eduard Schulte, an important German industrialist doing well financially out of the war it seems but secretly, as an upper class German, despising Hitler and the Nazis. He apparently got some of the earliest warnings about a deliberate extermination of the Jews out to the Allies via a Jewish banker in Zurich who promised not to reveal his name. A couple of historians were featured saying that research which eventually disclosed Schulte as the main reliable inside source of information was amongst their most satisfying, partly it seems because so difficult. But not in doubt.

    So, what do you make of this contemporaneous information about the carefully, euphemistically, described deliberate Final Solution to the Jewish Question? No, don't answer for a while. Consider.

    Wally’s response would probably be similar to my own, which would be a request that you produce evidence of mass execution of Jews occurring at any of the work camps. Along with evidence that any Final Solution to the Jewish question ever existed anywhere other than in the minds of Jews who to this day are obsessed with the idea of making billions from an imaginary event that obviously never occurred.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    "obviously" is a real marker of faith ahead of reason. Try looking at the film "The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust to start with - or you could start with Hitler's vicious rants against the Jews in Mein Kampf and elsewhere. We know Hitler and other leading Nazis wanted to cleanse German territory of Jews -
    initially to Palestine might have sufficed, especially if there was money in it, and the existence and behaviour of Einsatzgruppen had already proven that mass murder of Jews was as acceptable indeed desirable as killing Communist officials. (Remember the Germans own radio communications described it).
    Then you should brush up on the 20th January 1942 Wannsee conference because its records will set you right about The Final Solution [of the Jewish Question/Problem]. The German for that Die Endlösung der Judenfrage was used evidently to avoid recording such words as "killing" or "extermination" but it seems that there, where the need to speed up the program was top of the agenda, was where the use of gas beyond just carbon monoxide from exhaust was decided. I wonder why you think the Nazis rounded up hundreds of thousands of Jews in several countries including women, old people and children who would be useless as slave labor and shipped them, together with men who could do heavy work, to camps like Auschwicz? Wasn't killing them on arrival just the rational step to take by those running Himmler's SS industrial contribution to the war economy. They starved millions of Soviet POWs to death so what makes you think they were going to feed useless Jews in the camps. If they didn't want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!
    I think you'll find some obvious stuff in that... But do see the doco and open your mind to thought about what it tells you.
    , @utu
    And what evidence would satisfy you? They did not have CCTV in crematoria or gas chambers or where the shootings were done, I am afraid. I they had and you could see it on YT you and Wally would scream: crisis actors, crisis actors, nobody dies like that, it's fake bad acting.

    You should be honest and state that there is no evidence that you would be satisfied with. I am sure you are very skeptical about everything you have been told in school. I mean everything. Do you believe that Columbus made it to Hispaniola? Maybe it was a hoax he perpetrated on Spanish Crown to swindle it out of some cash?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. yurivku says:

    People who think they are defending Jews will point to Jewish contributions to nearly everything–science, music, math, technology, literature, charity, medicine, support for symphonies. These contributions are real and immense

    Could the author add 2 and 2? “Immense” contribution partly is a result of overpresence of Jews everywhere “science, music, math, technology, literature, charity, medicine, support for symphonies” except factories and army.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  166. @Wizard of Oz
    Wally - you'll be glad to know that some French documentary makers in 2015 made a film which I saw on Australia's Foxtel 's History Channel called approx. The Secret History of WW2 Ep 5 The Holocaust which will update your knowledge of something you care passionately about.

    I criticise it for saying weakly near the end that the Allied bombing of chemical plants not far from Auschwicz showed that they could have taken out the gas chambers when the most credible experts had already explained why neither bombing the railways nor attempting precision bombing would be a realistic option.

    You will enjoy just one thing and that is my second criticism. After more that once referring to the 3.5 to 4 million Jews the Nazis explicitly aimed to eliminate out of Europe's 11 million Jews it stated without elaboration near the end that 6 million Jews were murdered.

    That's the end of the joy for you because what has now been given air is all the information that was being given to the Allies, and its sources, from 1940 or 41 onwards.

    In late 1941 when he could do nothing about it Churchill received information from Enigma intercepts/transcripts that Jews were being murdered in the Soviet Union by shootings of thousands at a time (eventually amounting to about 1 million) and this was undeniable because it was from German supposedly secret communications.

    Then Witold Pilecki ( see Wikipedia entry if you haven't heard of him) began the process of getting precise information out of Auschwicz to the Polish Government in exile in London which of course was passed on to the major Allies. He had deliberately had himself arrested so he could join resistance people already in Auschwicz in 1940 with a view to organising a revolt, which proved impossible. His first communication of the reality, including the gas chambers, was in 1942 via the amazing escape of four Poles in a German car through the front gate. One, who died last year at the age of 98 was interviewed. His name, qv, was Kazimierz Piechowski.

    Later Pilecki escaped and survived the Warsaw uprising (but executed in 1949 by the Communists). His reports were shown so that, if one could read Polish, what was being narrated could be verified or falsified.

    But then the big one, who had to escape Germany in 1943 from which he went to Zurich and married his Jewish mistress. He was Eduard Schulte, an important German industrialist doing well financially out of the war it seems but secretly, as an upper class German, despising Hitler and the Nazis. He apparently got some of the earliest warnings about a deliberate extermination of the Jews out to the Allies via a Jewish banker in Zurich who promised not to reveal his name. A couple of historians were featured saying that research which eventually disclosed Schulte as the main reliable inside source of information was amongst their most satisfying, partly it seems because so difficult. But not in doubt.

    So, what do you make of this contemporaneous information about the carefully, euphemistically, described deliberate Final Solution to the Jewish Question? No, don't answer for a while. Consider.

    Correction: The film is called “The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. @Carroll Price
    Wally's response would probably be similar to my own, which would be a request that you produce evidence of mass execution of Jews occurring at any of the work camps. Along with evidence that any Final Solution to the Jewish question ever existed anywhere other than in the minds of Jews who to this day are obsessed with the idea of making billions from an imaginary event that obviously never occurred.

    “obviously” is a real marker of faith ahead of reason. Try looking at the film “The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust to start with – or you could start with Hitler’s vicious rants against the Jews in Mein Kampf and elsewhere. We know Hitler and other leading Nazis wanted to cleanse German territory of Jews -
    initially to Palestine might have sufficed, especially if there was money in it, and the existence and behaviour of Einsatzgruppen had already proven that mass murder of Jews was as acceptable indeed desirable as killing Communist officials. (Remember the Germans own radio communications described it).
    Then you should brush up on the 20th January 1942 Wannsee conference because its records will set you right about The Final Solution [of the Jewish Question/Problem]. The German for that Die Endlösung der Judenfrage was used evidently to avoid recording such words as “killing” or “extermination” but it seems that there, where the need to speed up the program was top of the agenda, was where the use of gas beyond just carbon monoxide from exhaust was decided. I wonder why you think the Nazis rounded up hundreds of thousands of Jews in several countries including women, old people and children who would be useless as slave labor and shipped them, together with men who could do heavy work, to camps like Auschwicz? Wasn’t killing them on arrival just the rational step to take by those running Himmler’s SS industrial contribution to the war economy. They starved millions of Soviet POWs to death so what makes you think they were going to feed useless Jews in the camps. If they didn’t want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!
    I think you’ll find some obvious stuff in that… But do see the doco and open your mind to thought about what it tells you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    She asked you a simple question, which you have not answered. Apart from offering up your usual long-winded blather (why are you unable to come to any damn point, man), you refer to the Wannsee Protocols, which even mainstream historians agree had little if anything to do with the conventional Holocaust narrative. And yes, there were mass shootings on the Eastern Front, but according to the Germans own documents these took place in the context of anti-partisan operations and the numbers killed are greatly exaggerated.
    , @Harbinger
    What you have written is nothing but official, Jewish propaganda and nothing more.
    There was no extermination policy whatsoever, so much so that the offer still stands by author and respected historian David Irving of a cash reward for proof that there was.

    Jews were rounded up in all countries because they were communist subversives. They were sent to the work camps and not killed because they were instrumental in the German war effort. Work camps, not death camps had nurseries, hospitals, theatres, cinemas, bars and brothels for the Jews within. They were also paid camp money so as to buy from the camp stores.

    Hitler tried to send most of the Jews to Palestine but the world Jewish congress refused to pay him the $2million for all the Jews he wanted to send. Yes, you read that correctly. The Rothschilds, today with an estimated fortune of $500 trillion refused to pay the fee wanted to extradite Jews, from Europe, to Palestine or out of Europe.
    Already, they were creating the lie that would become the extermination of 6million Jews. Before WW2 even commenced, there were 100 mentions of 6million Jews dying somewhere in the world:
    http://balder.org/judea/Six-Million-140-Occurrences-Of-The-Word-Holocaust-And-The-Number-6,000,000-Before-The-Nuremberg-Trials-Began.php

    Any document that promotes the lie of the holocaust is propaganda and nothing else.
    And then of course there's this rabbi stating that not even 1million Jews died in WW2:
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ny-rabbi-not-even-1-million-jews-killed-in-holocaust/

    One can tell just how effective indoctrination truly is when goyim start defending Jews and promoting their lies. And more so, when they fail to realize that they've swallowed the lies hook, line and sinker this proves just how successful the indoctrination is. The more people read, watch and listen to the msm, the more they will believe the propaganda.

    , @Wally
    The Wannsee minutes say nothing about killing Jews and have been doctored. The provenance is laughable, see:
    'Wannsee Conference minutes debunked': https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1647
    and:
    The Wannsee Conference Protocol
    Anatomy of a Fabrication: http://codoh.com/library/document/934/

    The Germans wanted Jews out of Europe, so they deported them. No one questions that. So what?

    We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    man up, debate, & learn:
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    , @Carroll Price
    Sorry Wiz, but when it comes to history, (particularly WW 2 history) Jew-run Hollywood would be the last place I'd look.
    , @utu

    If they didn’t want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!
     
    Actually this is what was happening. From Warsaw Ghetto and Lodz Ghetto people who were not working were sent first. It seems that in places like Treblinka there was no selection for the arrivals and everybody was killed right away except for the skeletal workers crew. There was no industry around and workers were not needed. But Auschwitz was huge complex of camps and sub camps were workers were housed for factories in Silesia. For example when Hungarian Jews started arriving in 1944 some were killed right away and some were drafted to work. Strangely about 17,000 of Hungarian women were housed in a temporary camp and were not put to work (mortality was high) and many of them later were sent to other camps. Why they were not killed there? Why Ann Frank was not killed there? Or the case of Czech Jews from Theresienstadt who were kept in Birkenau for one year before being liquidated. Also Gypsies in Birkenau had a sub camp where they lived as whole families before being liquidated. There is something haphazard about the whole process of extermination as if it sometimes was done out of necessity for the lack of other options. So it was not always: kill all the Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Harbinger says:

    Fred Reed,

    Any people, not of a land, who move to live in that land and who do not integrate but segregate themselves off from the population are a problem. They are, what history has told us, a fifth column.

    Now you could use the Amish, for example, who do not integrate into western society to parallel the situation with Jews, as being nothing wrong, choosing to live their own lives outwith the indigenous population, but there is a HUGE difference between the Amish and the Jews.

    Firstly, the Amish are Christians. They believe in the golden rule – do unto others as you would unto you. Jews, do not believe in this rule. Their Babylonian Talmud, the primary teaching literature of rabbis specifically states that it is perfectly acceptable to steal from, enslave, assault, rape and murder non Jews with no incrimination. This book (including the Old Testament) teaches that Jews are superior to all non Jews (goyim).

    Secondly, the Amish live within their communities and sell their produce to the non Amish. This is where their interaction with non Amish stops. Jews, on the other hand seek positions of power with which to influence the running of the country that they make up 1% of. They are the hair, controlling the tail that’s wagging the dog. They attain positions in government, in the judiciary, in academia, in the msm, in the entertainment industries, in the armed forces along with creating anti white, heterosexual organizations for all minorities with grievances.

    With their presence in the government they lobby to wage war on countries that pose the west no threat, sending in non Jewish troops to kill and be killed. In doing so they bring hatred towards westerners, previously not there.
    With their control within the judiciary, they fight to destroy the constitution in the USA along with indigenous freedoms within the rest of the west. They create legislation upon legislation that makes everything but passing wind illegal and thus an offense.
    With their control in academia, they make sure most of the truth remains hidden, indoctrinating non Jews into believing that Jews are completely innocent and what happened to them in the past, such as being kicked out of every land they’ve been in wasn’t as a result of typically bad Jewish behaviour, but instead a hatred for Jews. They also make sure that Jews and other minorities are over represented within universities and the whites vastly under represented. They also use academia to teach their cultural Marxism, turning society into drones.
    With their control within the msm they use this as an indoctrination tool, no differently to what they do in academia, turning truths into lies and lies into truths, promoting that which shouldn’t be promoted and not promoting that which should.
    With their control of the entertainment industry; through the film industry they create their propaganda movies. Through the music industry they corrupt the youth promoting homosexuals and feminist women as role models. Through the sports industries they keep people drawn away from what’s really going on around them and of late, have politicized it.
    Through their control of the armed forces, top brass work with the judiciary and the government to make sure war happens, while they sit back and watch millions of goyim subordinates kill one another, again a replay of WW1 and those who created the wars, sitting miles away from front lines, out of harms way.

    And what of the average Jew?
    Well what of the average Jew? How many Jews are campaigning to see all the above corruption removed? I don’t see any, do you? The complicity of the Jew, is their silence. When one does a survey of Jews and their views of Zionism, you will find that they all overwhelmingly support the Jewish state.

    The Jew is the eternal parasite. They remain in the west because no parasite ever leaves its host, unless there’s another one nearby.
    All one needs to do is look at their kol nidre prayer and festival of Yom Kippur. This speaks volumes, as the prayer absolves Jews of honouring all deals with non Jews in the coming year.

    The public are 99% oblivious to Jewry due to their control in all of the above establishments. They are destroying the second amendment and have brought hate speech in, throughout the west, because they know that it’s only a matter of time, courtesy of the internet, that more and more people will wake up to see what they truly are and what they have done that has caused so much misery in this world. They are rapidly destroying freedom of speech in order to have the freedom to incriminate anyone who speaks the truth on them. The Jews are terrified of the non Jewish majority finding out because the next ‘holocaust’ will see their extinction and they know it.

    This is the future of the Jews. They either perish, as they rightly should or will turn this world into one big Gaza strip, one big open air prison, where they can continue to feed off of the goyim and prosper as they have.

    And finally, Jews are only successful because they are part of the ‘big club’. As a Jew doors are opened for you in ALL establishments. Every industry out there is run by Jews. The film industry is full of Jew directors, producers, screen writers, actors and actresses, again disproportionately representing their ethnic demographic. And because these actors, actresses and musicians are foisted upon us, we are brainwashed into believing that the Jews are the best. Again, it’s a lie. Yet more Jewish perfidy promoting itself as reality.

    Read More
    • Agree: Carroll Price
    • Replies: @utu

    They either perish, as they rightly should or will turn this world into one big Gaza strip
     
    I have no doubt that there are some Jews who are very cognizant of the fact that the full spectrum domination of society is the only way for Jews to remain Jews in this world. It is either conquer or perish. The perishing for them is ceasing to be Jewish. They rather risk a biological annihilation while trying to conquer the world. After WWII and Holocaust they will not take any chances. For them it is us or them question.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. @Wizard of Oz
    "obviously" is a real marker of faith ahead of reason. Try looking at the film "The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust to start with - or you could start with Hitler's vicious rants against the Jews in Mein Kampf and elsewhere. We know Hitler and other leading Nazis wanted to cleanse German territory of Jews -
    initially to Palestine might have sufficed, especially if there was money in it, and the existence and behaviour of Einsatzgruppen had already proven that mass murder of Jews was as acceptable indeed desirable as killing Communist officials. (Remember the Germans own radio communications described it).
    Then you should brush up on the 20th January 1942 Wannsee conference because its records will set you right about The Final Solution [of the Jewish Question/Problem]. The German for that Die Endlösung der Judenfrage was used evidently to avoid recording such words as "killing" or "extermination" but it seems that there, where the need to speed up the program was top of the agenda, was where the use of gas beyond just carbon monoxide from exhaust was decided. I wonder why you think the Nazis rounded up hundreds of thousands of Jews in several countries including women, old people and children who would be useless as slave labor and shipped them, together with men who could do heavy work, to camps like Auschwicz? Wasn't killing them on arrival just the rational step to take by those running Himmler's SS industrial contribution to the war economy. They starved millions of Soviet POWs to death so what makes you think they were going to feed useless Jews in the camps. If they didn't want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!
    I think you'll find some obvious stuff in that... But do see the doco and open your mind to thought about what it tells you.

    She asked you a simple question, which you have not answered. Apart from offering up your usual long-winded blather (why are you unable to come to any damn point, man), you refer to the Wannsee Protocols, which even mainstream historians agree had little if anything to do with the conventional Holocaust narrative. And yes, there were mass shootings on the Eastern Front, but according to the Germans own documents these took place in the context of anti-partisan operations and the numbers killed are greatly exaggerated.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    An interesting intervention. Are you one of a tight little coven of obsessive denialists who knows that "Carroll [sic]" Price - or Wally - is female?

    I understand how anyone can be rendered mentally shortwinded by all the Holocaust denial bluster but it shouldn't really be too difficult for you to understand the course of the conversation which related to something much narrower and more precise than the vast literature on gas chambers,Jews and others murdered etc.

    I offered Wally and other likeminded obsessives a chance to debunk in detail a very well made doco which - no one has denied - contains new material since people like you formed their settled views. Interesting that no one has cited previous reference to the heroic contribtions of Pilecki and Schulte - just same ol same old. ..

    So... have you seen the doco? Care to give (OK attempt) a Steve Sailer quality review?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. @Corvinus
    "The gist of the quote is that it requires religion to make good people do evil things, an absolute fact that’s easily observed in virtually all societies, from the present to the Maya, Aztec and other ancient societies that required the sacrifice of human being to appease the gods."

    Actually, religion COULD or MAY make good people do evil things. So your assertion that of absolute fact is other than accurate. Furthermore, the sacrifice of human beings to appease the Gods was not considered "evil" to them in the cultures you listed. From our perspective, and in retrospect, it is deemed as "evil".

    "As to the present, the quote is particularly applicable to the large numbers of Americans who call themselves Christians being in whole-hearted support of the US military slaying as many innocent victims in foreign countries as possible – with the more, the better."

    The Americans who "call themselves Christians" are Christians. If you doubt their faith, you will certainly have to do more than merely call out those who support the American armed forces and their duty to carry out foreign policy initiatives. In some cases, absolutely, there have been innocent people who have died as a result of our "meddling". But in a number of cases, the Just War Theory applied, and so the casualties were not considered as "victims" or "innocent" in that context. Certainly, one could make a reasonable argument that this theory was inappropriately employed, or that American foreign policy objectives in and of themselves are immoral. But those designations mandate thoughtful analysis.

    Cuck.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. @Max Denken
    The trouble with all of you, true believers, is that you are ignorant not only of the mountain of evidence in English and another one in pictures, but are linguistically ignorant as well. For additional mountains of evidence exist in Polish, compiled by the Poles, and in Czech compiled by the Czechs, and in Serbian compiled by the Serbs, and in Russians compiled by the Russians -- and those peoples are hardly philosemitic...
    There are many millions of authentic words there, thousands of document facsimiles, thousands more pix... but since you can't read it, you deny it exists...
    A little sampler:
    Polish: http://www.wikiwand.com/pl/%C5%81apanka
    Polish: 28 web pages in just one category of German crimes against the Polish people
    Polish (and not Jewish): Majdanek http://www.majdanek.eu/en/history
    Polish (and not Jewish): Treblinka http://www.treblinka-muzeum.eu/
    Czech: Lidice: http://www.lidice-memorial.cz/en/

    English+pix: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2204160/Darkest-atrocities-Nazis-laid-bare-secretly-recorded-conversations-German-prisoners-war.html#ixzz3n6ZlCXOe
    English: http://www.pacwashmetrodiv.org/events/holoc04/moor-jankowski.htm
    A few pix for your conniptions as to how they were faked: https://www.private-prague-guide.com/article/life-during-the-nazi-occupation/

    This concludes my participation in the discussion of this subject. As I mentioned, I have no time to waste on arguing with fanatics the subjects of their fanaticism. Believe as you will.

    Aww, don’t go.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. @Carroll Price
    I would assume that the low birth rate among Jews is, at least partially, due to an unusually high percentage of male and female Jews being homosexual.

    Ortodox jews have highest rates….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Harbinger says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    "obviously" is a real marker of faith ahead of reason. Try looking at the film "The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust to start with - or you could start with Hitler's vicious rants against the Jews in Mein Kampf and elsewhere. We know Hitler and other leading Nazis wanted to cleanse German territory of Jews -
    initially to Palestine might have sufficed, especially if there was money in it, and the existence and behaviour of Einsatzgruppen had already proven that mass murder of Jews was as acceptable indeed desirable as killing Communist officials. (Remember the Germans own radio communications described it).
    Then you should brush up on the 20th January 1942 Wannsee conference because its records will set you right about The Final Solution [of the Jewish Question/Problem]. The German for that Die Endlösung der Judenfrage was used evidently to avoid recording such words as "killing" or "extermination" but it seems that there, where the need to speed up the program was top of the agenda, was where the use of gas beyond just carbon monoxide from exhaust was decided. I wonder why you think the Nazis rounded up hundreds of thousands of Jews in several countries including women, old people and children who would be useless as slave labor and shipped them, together with men who could do heavy work, to camps like Auschwicz? Wasn't killing them on arrival just the rational step to take by those running Himmler's SS industrial contribution to the war economy. They starved millions of Soviet POWs to death so what makes you think they were going to feed useless Jews in the camps. If they didn't want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!
    I think you'll find some obvious stuff in that... But do see the doco and open your mind to thought about what it tells you.

    What you have written is nothing but official, Jewish propaganda and nothing more.
    There was no extermination policy whatsoever, so much so that the offer still stands by author and respected historian David Irving of a cash reward for proof that there was.

    Jews were rounded up in all countries because they were communist subversives. They were sent to the work camps and not killed because they were instrumental in the German war effort. Work camps, not death camps had nurseries, hospitals, theatres, cinemas, bars and brothels for the Jews within. They were also paid camp money so as to buy from the camp stores.

    Hitler tried to send most of the Jews to Palestine but the world Jewish congress refused to pay him the $2million for all the Jews he wanted to send. Yes, you read that correctly. The Rothschilds, today with an estimated fortune of $500 trillion refused to pay the fee wanted to extradite Jews, from Europe, to Palestine or out of Europe.
    Already, they were creating the lie that would become the extermination of 6million Jews. Before WW2 even commenced, there were 100 mentions of 6million Jews dying somewhere in the world:

    http://balder.org/judea/Six-Million-140-Occurrences-Of-The-Word-Holocaust-And-The-Number-6,000,000-Before-The-Nuremberg-Trials-Began.php

    Any document that promotes the lie of the holocaust is propaganda and nothing else.
    And then of course there’s this rabbi stating that not even 1million Jews died in WW2:

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ny-rabbi-not-even-1-million-jews-killed-in-holocaust/

    One can tell just how effective indoctrination truly is when goyim start defending Jews and promoting their lies. And more so, when they fail to realize that they’ve swallowed the lies hook, line and sinker this proves just how successful the indoctrination is. The more people read, watch and listen to the msm, the more they will believe the propaganda.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    You need to be careful quoting that Rabbi. He believes the 6M number, he just disputes how many were really Jews according to Rabbinical law.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    What can be the point of this ridiculous trolling? Or do you ave a mental illness? Just the absurdity of your $2 million and $500 trillion figures without more saves me the trouble of wasting time on anything from "Harbinger".

    Stlll I can'/t resist. Why would the Germans, so hardpressed for food and war production that they empluyed fit male and childless female deportees as forced labor who often died from starvation and related illness, bother to deport millions of Jewish old people, women and children, feed them and provide all the facilities you say they had (which even Wally would say had never been found - did the SS destroy all the evidences of their humane treatment of deportees?) ?

    Actually. Please make the world seem sane and rational. Tell me you are a naughty Jewish poltergeist seeing if you can make the Wally grade deniers look even more riduculous than they do without help.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. @Harbinger
    What you have written is nothing but official, Jewish propaganda and nothing more.
    There was no extermination policy whatsoever, so much so that the offer still stands by author and respected historian David Irving of a cash reward for proof that there was.

    Jews were rounded up in all countries because they were communist subversives. They were sent to the work camps and not killed because they were instrumental in the German war effort. Work camps, not death camps had nurseries, hospitals, theatres, cinemas, bars and brothels for the Jews within. They were also paid camp money so as to buy from the camp stores.

    Hitler tried to send most of the Jews to Palestine but the world Jewish congress refused to pay him the $2million for all the Jews he wanted to send. Yes, you read that correctly. The Rothschilds, today with an estimated fortune of $500 trillion refused to pay the fee wanted to extradite Jews, from Europe, to Palestine or out of Europe.
    Already, they were creating the lie that would become the extermination of 6million Jews. Before WW2 even commenced, there were 100 mentions of 6million Jews dying somewhere in the world:
    http://balder.org/judea/Six-Million-140-Occurrences-Of-The-Word-Holocaust-And-The-Number-6,000,000-Before-The-Nuremberg-Trials-Began.php

    Any document that promotes the lie of the holocaust is propaganda and nothing else.
    And then of course there's this rabbi stating that not even 1million Jews died in WW2:
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ny-rabbi-not-even-1-million-jews-killed-in-holocaust/

    One can tell just how effective indoctrination truly is when goyim start defending Jews and promoting their lies. And more so, when they fail to realize that they've swallowed the lies hook, line and sinker this proves just how successful the indoctrination is. The more people read, watch and listen to the msm, the more they will believe the propaganda.

    You need to be careful quoting that Rabbi. He believes the 6M number, he just disputes how many were really Jews according to Rabbinical law.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. Harbinger says:

    Some more reasons as to why are Jews hated from the very own words of the Jews:

    1. Noel Ignatiev was an art professor in Massachusetts. Regardless of his vitriol towards white people and his clear hatred he was never questioned for his white genocide views and remained in his position in an art’s college. How many whites would have lasted a day, if they’d said the same about blacks and Jews?

    2. This is an excellent short video on what Jews have said of their coming new world order. It shows their ethnocentricism and hatred for non Jews. And again, like point one, all of these people were in positions of power and extreme influence. None of them were questioned for their views. No msm source ridiculed them for their views and they remained in their positions until they retired:

    3. And finally (although there are by far, many more examples) here is another informative of what Zionist AND anti Zionist Jews have said of non Jews, which instantly dispels any lies, such as those promoted by David Icke etc, that state the evil isn’t Judaism but Zionism, when in reality Zionism is merely one of the many tentacles of Judaism, along with others such as communism and free masonry: https://theevilofzionismexposedbyjews.weebly.com/1-what-zionist-and-anti-zionist-jews-have-said-about-goyem-means-cattle-jewish-name-for-non-jews-christianity-and-judaism.html

    I always like the quote by ex Palestinian Jew, Gilad Atzmon that “…there are no Jewish conspiracies. Everything is done in the open.”

    And to Fred Reed, if you care to watch the above videos and read the link provided, understand just what would have happened to white people, in positions of power who had said merely a fraction of what these Jews have said but aimed towards, Jews, blacks or other minorities? This in itself shows just how much power Jews have in the msm and political world to be free to say whatever they want with no incrimination whatsoever and worse, that they are such a tiny minority within a population they utterly loathe and despise. Worse, that they even use these people, to fight wars to secure their Israeli, racist, apartheid state, not caring how many deaths there are, on both sides of the ensuing conflicts. And while they fight for the Jews, to create their Greater Israel, Jews work in tandem and vociferously to utterly destroy their lands, flooding them with immigrants and promoting cultural Marxism, both wrecking their nations. The exact opposite of what they promote in Israel.
    And again, another quote by Gilad Atzmon: “Jewish Power-The power to silence criticism of Jewish Power.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I was going to hit the "agree" key on your video, but I would not say that I totally agree. The whole "Judaism" thing is basically, literally a tie-in to Satanism when you look at all of it's tentacles; as you mentioned, kikemasonry, communism, pornography, etc. This is the step people don't get.

    I once watched a video by an ex-FBI agent who said that there are 3-4 million Satanists in America. Most of the simpletons, but a huge percentage connected straight to the top. That is about 1% of the American population at large.

    I do not think every Jew understands or is complicit in the controversy, but I am sure that it is much higher than 1%; probably more like 10%, could be higher. This is a lot of complicity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. Mulegino1 says:
    @Max Denken
    The trouble with all of you, true believers, is that you are ignorant not only of the mountain of evidence in English and another one in pictures, but are linguistically ignorant as well. For additional mountains of evidence exist in Polish, compiled by the Poles, and in Czech compiled by the Czechs, and in Serbian compiled by the Serbs, and in Russians compiled by the Russians -- and those peoples are hardly philosemitic...
    There are many millions of authentic words there, thousands of document facsimiles, thousands more pix... but since you can't read it, you deny it exists...
    A little sampler:
    Polish: http://www.wikiwand.com/pl/%C5%81apanka
    Polish: 28 web pages in just one category of German crimes against the Polish people
    Polish (and not Jewish): Majdanek http://www.majdanek.eu/en/history
    Polish (and not Jewish): Treblinka http://www.treblinka-muzeum.eu/
    Czech: Lidice: http://www.lidice-memorial.cz/en/

    English+pix: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2204160/Darkest-atrocities-Nazis-laid-bare-secretly-recorded-conversations-German-prisoners-war.html#ixzz3n6ZlCXOe
    English: http://www.pacwashmetrodiv.org/events/holoc04/moor-jankowski.htm
    A few pix for your conniptions as to how they were faked: https://www.private-prague-guide.com/article/life-during-the-nazi-occupation/

    This concludes my participation in the discussion of this subject. As I mentioned, I have no time to waste on arguing with fanatics the subjects of their fanaticism. Believe as you will.

    It is you Holohoaxers who are the “true believers.” I notice you did not address a single point I made about Treblinka II.

    Every time anyone questions one aspect of the official narrative, say, the alleged “homicidal gas chambers of Birkenau” and brings forth proof that they did not exist, such as chemical analyses of the brickwork or the technical absurdity of the alleged method of execution, one is met by such a barrage of nonsense and propaganda.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. Wally says:
    @Max Denken
    I dodge nothing, but on the other hand I notice that you are a fanatic. Discussing Hitler, Holocaust 1, Holocaust 2 (of the Slavs) or the JQ with you would be like trying to convince a Muslim that Muhammad did not quite leap on his horse to heaven, or trying to challenge a 15th century padre's notions of the Holy Trinity. Happy hallucinations, my friend.

    IOW, you do not have the proof I that requested.

    Indeed, I am a “fanatic” for the truth. Deal with it.

    http://www.codoh.com

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”

    - fake “holocaust historian” Raul Hilberg,

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. Wally says:
    @Max Denken
    The trouble with all of you, true believers, is that you are ignorant not only of the mountain of evidence in English and another one in pictures, but are linguistically ignorant as well. For additional mountains of evidence exist in Polish, compiled by the Poles, and in Czech compiled by the Czechs, and in Serbian compiled by the Serbs, and in Russians compiled by the Russians -- and those peoples are hardly philosemitic...
    There are many millions of authentic words there, thousands of document facsimiles, thousands more pix... but since you can't read it, you deny it exists...
    A little sampler:
    Polish: http://www.wikiwand.com/pl/%C5%81apanka
    Polish: 28 web pages in just one category of German crimes against the Polish people
    Polish (and not Jewish): Majdanek http://www.majdanek.eu/en/history
    Polish (and not Jewish): Treblinka http://www.treblinka-muzeum.eu/
    Czech: Lidice: http://www.lidice-memorial.cz/en/

    English+pix: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2204160/Darkest-atrocities-Nazis-laid-bare-secretly-recorded-conversations-German-prisoners-war.html#ixzz3n6ZlCXOe
    English: http://www.pacwashmetrodiv.org/events/holoc04/moor-jankowski.htm
    A few pix for your conniptions as to how they were faked: https://www.private-prague-guide.com/article/life-during-the-nazi-occupation/

    This concludes my participation in the discussion of this subject. As I mentioned, I have no time to waste on arguing with fanatics the subjects of their fanaticism. Believe as you will.

    Wow, you post links to laughable tall tales which have already been easily utterly debunked but are too dumb to realize it.
    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    And of course you ignore the mountain of debunking information I presented. You are truly in denial of science.
    ex.
    Your mentioned Majdanek: http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DT/gcturen.html
    U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays standard German air-raid shelter door, describing it as the door to a gas chamber at Majdanek

    - If there was ‘a plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ as alleged, then why are there countless numbers of so called “survivor$”?

    - If the alleged ‘holocaust’ was fact, then why are there laws in Europe to prevent scrutiny of it? What kind of “truth” needs to imprison people to prevent free speech?

    - If Jews are so sure that millions of Jews were murdered, then why do they ask such dumb questions like “what happened to them then?

    - Why transport Jews away from allegedly functioning “death camps” and then allegedly go to the huge war time expense & effort to ship them elsewhere just to kill them? A truly ridiculous claim.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. Truth says:
    @Harbinger
    Some more reasons as to why are Jews hated from the very own words of the Jews:

    1. Noel Ignatiev was an art professor in Massachusetts. Regardless of his vitriol towards white people and his clear hatred he was never questioned for his white genocide views and remained in his position in an art's college. How many whites would have lasted a day, if they'd said the same about blacks and Jews? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt2PF4WefTI

    2. This is an excellent short video on what Jews have said of their coming new world order. It shows their ethnocentricism and hatred for non Jews. And again, like point one, all of these people were in positions of power and extreme influence. None of them were questioned for their views. No msm source ridiculed them for their views and they remained in their positions until they retired: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxRtPZbE7QE

    3. And finally (although there are by far, many more examples) here is another informative of what Zionist AND anti Zionist Jews have said of non Jews, which instantly dispels any lies, such as those promoted by David Icke etc, that state the evil isn't Judaism but Zionism, when in reality Zionism is merely one of the many tentacles of Judaism, along with others such as communism and free masonry: https://theevilofzionismexposedbyjews.weebly.com/1-what-zionist-and-anti-zionist-jews-have-said-about-goyem-means-cattle-jewish-name-for-non-jews-christianity-and-judaism.html

    I always like the quote by ex Palestinian Jew, Gilad Atzmon that "...there are no Jewish conspiracies. Everything is done in the open."

    And to Fred Reed, if you care to watch the above videos and read the link provided, understand just what would have happened to white people, in positions of power who had said merely a fraction of what these Jews have said but aimed towards, Jews, blacks or other minorities? This in itself shows just how much power Jews have in the msm and political world to be free to say whatever they want with no incrimination whatsoever and worse, that they are such a tiny minority within a population they utterly loathe and despise. Worse, that they even use these people, to fight wars to secure their Israeli, racist, apartheid state, not caring how many deaths there are, on both sides of the ensuing conflicts. And while they fight for the Jews, to create their Greater Israel, Jews work in tandem and vociferously to utterly destroy their lands, flooding them with immigrants and promoting cultural Marxism, both wrecking their nations. The exact opposite of what they promote in Israel.
    And again, another quote by Gilad Atzmon: "Jewish Power-The power to silence criticism of Jewish Power."

    I was going to hit the “agree” key on your video, but I would not say that I totally agree. The whole “Judaism” thing is basically, literally a tie-in to Satanism when you look at all of it’s tentacles; as you mentioned, kikemasonry, communism, pornography, etc. This is the step people don’t get.

    I once watched a video by an ex-FBI agent who said that there are 3-4 million Satanists in America. Most of the simpletons, but a huge percentage connected straight to the top. That is about 1% of the American population at large.

    I do not think every Jew understands or is complicit in the controversy, but I am sure that it is much higher than 1%; probably more like 10%, could be higher. This is a lot of complicity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. John Derbyshire once commented in this vein, and I see too that whenever the J-word appears in the “rightwing blogosphere” an endless crowd of creepy-crawlies emerge from the deeper nooks and covers the space like busy maggots on a cadaver. Guys, have fun. However, if I were the editor of this blog, that on the whole is quite critical of the J-people, I’d shut you out.

    You deserve your own special place. However, for general purpose blogs like this, the more Jews read the kind of deranged splatters you post, the more they are convinced that the Cossacks with sabers drawn are just a block away. They act accordingly… and they, not you, tilt things in this society. So we now have SPLC deciding for social media what’s “hate speech” or defamation. And the more you go on with this outpouring of crazy ordure, the tighter the screw will be. It would have been worth it, for the truth, but to suffer censorship because of the flare-ups of your fevered imagination, what a tremendous pity….

    Over and out.

    Read More
    • Troll: renfro
    • Replies: @Rowdy Rudy Pfeiffer
    TL;DR version: "Bend over and take it. You don't have a choice."

    yeah, thanks, princess...take your Midol and go lie down.

    , @Not a Russian Bot
    'You deserve your own special place.' Ghettos?
    , @Twodees Partain
    If you're going to go, stay gone, already.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Zumbuddi says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    Wally - you'll be glad to know that some French documentary makers in 2015 made a film which I saw on Australia's Foxtel 's History Channel called approx. The Secret History of WW2 Ep 5 The Holocaust which will update your knowledge of something you care passionately about.

    I criticise it for saying weakly near the end that the Allied bombing of chemical plants not far from Auschwicz showed that they could have taken out the gas chambers when the most credible experts had already explained why neither bombing the railways nor attempting precision bombing would be a realistic option.

    You will enjoy just one thing and that is my second criticism. After more that once referring to the 3.5 to 4 million Jews the Nazis explicitly aimed to eliminate out of Europe's 11 million Jews it stated without elaboration near the end that 6 million Jews were murdered.

    That's the end of the joy for you because what has now been given air is all the information that was being given to the Allies, and its sources, from 1940 or 41 onwards.

    In late 1941 when he could do nothing about it Churchill received information from Enigma intercepts/transcripts that Jews were being murdered in the Soviet Union by shootings of thousands at a time (eventually amounting to about 1 million) and this was undeniable because it was from German supposedly secret communications.

    Then Witold Pilecki ( see Wikipedia entry if you haven't heard of him) began the process of getting precise information out of Auschwicz to the Polish Government in exile in London which of course was passed on to the major Allies. He had deliberately had himself arrested so he could join resistance people already in Auschwicz in 1940 with a view to organising a revolt, which proved impossible. His first communication of the reality, including the gas chambers, was in 1942 via the amazing escape of four Poles in a German car through the front gate. One, who died last year at the age of 98 was interviewed. His name, qv, was Kazimierz Piechowski.

    Later Pilecki escaped and survived the Warsaw uprising (but executed in 1949 by the Communists). His reports were shown so that, if one could read Polish, what was being narrated could be verified or falsified.

    But then the big one, who had to escape Germany in 1943 from which he went to Zurich and married his Jewish mistress. He was Eduard Schulte, an important German industrialist doing well financially out of the war it seems but secretly, as an upper class German, despising Hitler and the Nazis. He apparently got some of the earliest warnings about a deliberate extermination of the Jews out to the Allies via a Jewish banker in Zurich who promised not to reveal his name. A couple of historians were featured saying that research which eventually disclosed Schulte as the main reliable inside source of information was amongst their most satisfying, partly it seems because so difficult. But not in doubt.

    So, what do you make of this contemporaneous information about the carefully, euphemistically, described deliberate Final Solution to the Jewish Question? No, don't answer for a while. Consider.

    Moron alert.

    “I saw it on TV and teevee never lies.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    Kindly prove that you have IQ points above the moronic by showing what is wrong with the points drawn from what you purport to be commenting on. Are there any of them uncheckable? Are any of them suggestive of fabrications? Did you know about Witold Pilecki and Eduard Schulte? Uf not, now that have heard of them what can you say that is not kindergsrten sandpit rhetoric?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. Gumby says:

    Hey Fred, You make a lot of good points but some how you seem to be blind to the elephant in the room which is “Jewish Supremacy”. It may start out as “The Jews are the chosen people” but to some radical Zionist faction it ends up being that “The Jews are the chosen people and Non-Jews are animals and do not count”
    Zionism has always embraced Jewish supremacy, Settler colonialism, and Ethnic cleansing. In Israel since the Likud Party has come to power Zionism has become very radical and fundamentalist. They now embrace government sanctioned violence, murder, torture, genocide, terrorism, deceit, and propaganda. Some small faction of Americans (Jews and non-Jews) alike are aligned with this radical Zionist ideology and their ultimate goal is to create an Israel that controls the entire Middle East. They believe that the best way to achieve this goal is to get the USA to destroy any and all their Middle Eastern neighbors that don’t accept the concept of Jewish Supremacy. In fact the Global War on Terrorism is an Israeli idea. They figured if they could create Muslim jihadist terrorists and then blame some major act of terrorism in the USA on them then the American people would support the type of perpetual war that it would require to eradicate all of Israel’s perceived enemies. Now I believe that much of the animosity towards Israel and Zionism in America today has to do with Jewish Radical Zionists and Non-Jewish Radical Zionists using out sized influence in the American Government to push this heinous Israeli agenda. The citizens of the USA that understand what is going on refuse to accept the rediculous assumptions that Anti-Zionism is equal to Anti-Semitism. I believe that the vast majority of Jewish people living in the USA do not subscribe to radical Zionist ideology. I further believe that those people who do subscribe to a radical Zionist ideology deliberately try to conflate Anti-Zionism with Anti-Semitism in order to disguise their agenda and to confuse the bulk of the American population.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  183. @Max Denken
    John Derbyshire once commented in this vein, and I see too that whenever the J-word appears in the "rightwing blogosphere" an endless crowd of creepy-crawlies emerge from the deeper nooks and covers the space like busy maggots on a cadaver. Guys, have fun. However, if I were the editor of this blog, that on the whole is quite critical of the J-people, I'd shut you out.

    You deserve your own special place. However, for general purpose blogs like this, the more Jews read the kind of deranged splatters you post, the more they are convinced that the Cossacks with sabers drawn are just a block away. They act accordingly... and they, not you, tilt things in this society. So we now have SPLC deciding for social media what's "hate speech" or defamation. And the more you go on with this outpouring of crazy ordure, the tighter the screw will be. It would have been worth it, for the truth, but to suffer censorship because of the flare-ups of your fevered imagination, what a tremendous pity....

    Over and out.

    TL;DR version: “Bend over and take it. You don’t have a choice.”

    yeah, thanks, princess…take your Midol and go lie down.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. ANON • Disclaimer says:
    @Zumbuddi
    Moron alert.

    "I saw it on TV and teevee never lies."

    Kindly prove that you have IQ points above the moronic by showing what is wrong with the points drawn from what you purport to be commenting on. Are there any of them uncheckable? Are any of them suggestive of fabrications? Did you know about Witold Pilecki and Eduard Schulte? Uf not, now that have heard of them what can you say that is not kindergsrten sandpit rhetoric?

    Read More
    • Troll: Kiza
    • Replies: @Wally
    Pilecki demolished here:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=pilecki

    Schulte debunked here:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=+Eduard+Schulte

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. @anon
    "ceaselessly starting wars and sending non-Jews to die for them".

    My simple advice to any non-Jew in the USA would be just not to join the military. Don't be a goyim chump. (I mean its not like you still have the draft).

    Sounds good until the fed gov calls the military to suppress US and it consists of an African and Mexican majority with, at best, little affection or loyalty to us.

    What is the least bad solution in this situation? Certainly patriots should join local, county, and state police forces, but like you said, never become active-status full-time military.

    It’s especially important to have large numbers of patriots within the police forces if, as I expect, private ownership of firearms in the USA will eventually be largely restricted to “law enforcement” personnel.

    I’d suggest that patriots join only the Reserves, not active-duty full-time military, but of course Reserves can be and are called up and deployed for destructive non-defensive / non-retaliatory aggression abroad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @Carroll Price
    By the stretch of anyone's imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?

    Took the words right out of my mouth, CP.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    "obviously" is a real marker of faith ahead of reason. Try looking at the film "The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust to start with - or you could start with Hitler's vicious rants against the Jews in Mein Kampf and elsewhere. We know Hitler and other leading Nazis wanted to cleanse German territory of Jews -
    initially to Palestine might have sufficed, especially if there was money in it, and the existence and behaviour of Einsatzgruppen had already proven that mass murder of Jews was as acceptable indeed desirable as killing Communist officials. (Remember the Germans own radio communications described it).
    Then you should brush up on the 20th January 1942 Wannsee conference because its records will set you right about The Final Solution [of the Jewish Question/Problem]. The German for that Die Endlösung der Judenfrage was used evidently to avoid recording such words as "killing" or "extermination" but it seems that there, where the need to speed up the program was top of the agenda, was where the use of gas beyond just carbon monoxide from exhaust was decided. I wonder why you think the Nazis rounded up hundreds of thousands of Jews in several countries including women, old people and children who would be useless as slave labor and shipped them, together with men who could do heavy work, to camps like Auschwicz? Wasn't killing them on arrival just the rational step to take by those running Himmler's SS industrial contribution to the war economy. They starved millions of Soviet POWs to death so what makes you think they were going to feed useless Jews in the camps. If they didn't want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!
    I think you'll find some obvious stuff in that... But do see the doco and open your mind to thought about what it tells you.

    The Wannsee minutes say nothing about killing Jews and have been doctored. The provenance is laughable, see:
    ‘Wannsee Conference minutes debunked’: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1647
    and:
    The Wannsee Conference Protocol
    Anatomy of a Fabrication: http://codoh.com/library/document/934/

    The Germans wanted Jews out of Europe, so they deported them. No one questions that. So what?

    We’re talking about an alleged ’6M Jews & 5M others’ … 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    man up, debate, & learn:
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I have an adult life time of getting to recognise cranks, obsessives and the paranoid with or without a few above average IQ points and I am not interested in taking up debate with obsessive cranks on something which is not of great interest to me. I am however, willing to read anything carefully analytical by you, a regular UR commenter, which shows that you can, if you can, which I doubt, absorb what the doco film discloses and my points about it, and deal with them in detail.

    I don't even know whether you accept the facts about the Enigma intercept, the imprisonment in Auschwicz of Witold Pilecki (had you heard of him?), his communications to London, Eduard Schulte, and his anti Nazi activity? If these are new to you since you formed your Holocaust hoax views I wonder about the mental processes by which you accommodate them.

    But what hope should I hold when you don't even acknowledge my careful point about the 3.5 - 4 million versus the 6 million?
    , @Amanda Huginkiss
    The minutes are both doctored and say nothing about killing Jews? Why doctor them if you’re not going to make them incriminating?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Do the Supreme Court’s Jewish justices make Jewish decisions–whatever that might mean?

    Nobody’s pointed out that it is only relatively recently that it became irrefutable that Brandeis and Frankfurter were both members of Parushim – a racial-supremacist secret society (no prize for guessing which ‘race’ was the ‘supreme’ one…).

    They never disclosed their membership publicly; now why would that be?

    Brandeis recruited like-minded (i.e., ethnoculturally similar) Harvard students and alumni, with the specific aim of promulgation of pro-Zionist narratives in the American political, legal and intellectual spheres. It was ‘clandestine’ in the sense that there was no publicly-acknowledged alliance between the people involved. (As a Mason, I recognise this sort of allegation, but let’s be clear – the Masonic conspiracy is not a patch on the Zionist one, either in depth or breadth: Masons sure as hell never got the Anglo-US power elite to give them an entire new country).

    Does that count as a Jewish decision, Fred? Using the cachet associated with SCOTUS – and the social and political deference accorded to Supreme Court justices (especially in those days) to advance the interests of a racist, exclusionist, hostile foreign culture?

    I reckon it’s pretty close, no matter how much you try to ‘Aw shucks’ your way out of it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  189. @Carroll Price
    By the stretch of anyone's imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?

    By the stretch of anyone’s imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?

    I’d say the attack on Afghanistan was justified if in fact the Taliban was giving shelter to Al-Qaeda as was alleged. But once they were taken out, we should have left them with a warning that we’d be back if anything like that happened again.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2 (Japan attacked, Germany declared war against us) and the War of 1812 (Britain invaded).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Even Afghanistan could have been dealt with - tell me someone if I am wrong - by threatening and executing continuous and escalating attack from the air until... e.g. ObL was given up (OK he escapes to Bora Bora so what next....?

    Doesn't WW1 count according to just war theory because - as in the case of an individual helpng somebody who is being physically attacked - it is OK to defend those likely to be conquered and, for example, lose territory, if nothing is done. Ir was Germany and Austria-Hungary that started WW1, the mistakes of others being less culpable, arguably, than those of France and the UK leading up to WW2 (in any case irrelevant because Serbia had finally given Austrua-Hungary no excuse for its German supported attack).

    Germany might still have won in 1917 and the fact that the results if WW1 were not obviously improved by US intervention then and in 1919 and later is not to the present point.

    , @RobinG
    Looks like you don't know that the Taliban offered to turn over Bin Laden ... if the US could show proof that he was responsible or involved in 911. George Bush refused.
    , @Carroll Price
    With mountains of evidence to disprove it, surely you cannot be serious in proposing that the US government ever thought Bin Laden had anything to do with 9/11.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. @Wally
    The Wannsee minutes say nothing about killing Jews and have been doctored. The provenance is laughable, see:
    'Wannsee Conference minutes debunked': https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1647
    and:
    The Wannsee Conference Protocol
    Anatomy of a Fabrication: http://codoh.com/library/document/934/

    The Germans wanted Jews out of Europe, so they deported them. No one questions that. So what?

    We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    man up, debate, & learn:
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    I have an adult life time of getting to recognise cranks, obsessives and the paranoid with or without a few above average IQ points and I am not interested in taking up debate with obsessive cranks on something which is not of great interest to me. I am however, willing to read anything carefully analytical by you, a regular UR commenter, which shows that you can, if you can, which I doubt, absorb what the doco film discloses and my points about it, and deal with them in detail.

    I don’t even know whether you accept the facts about the Enigma intercept, the imprisonment in Auschwicz of Witold Pilecki (had you heard of him?), his communications to London, Eduard Schulte, and his anti Nazi activity? If these are new to you since you formed your Holocaust hoax views I wonder about the mental processes by which you accommodate them.

    But what hope should I hold when you don’t even acknowledge my careful point about the 3.5 – 4 million versus the 6 million?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    There was no 3.5M 0r 6M. No 'holocaust-lite'.
    The "Holocau$t Industry" in court:
    'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'

    There is no proof, only easily debunked Zionist propagand
    Show it if you have it.

    - If there was ‘a plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ as alleged, then why are there countless numbers of so called “survivor$"?

    - If the alleged ‘holocaust’ was fact, then why are there laws in Europe to prevent scrutiny of it? What kind of “truth” needs to imprison people to prevent free speech?

    - If Jews are so sure that millions of Jews were murdered, then why do they ask such dumb questions like "what happened to them then?
    fact:
    Not a single British Bletchley Park intercept of secret German messages to and from Auschwitz and the so called 'death camps' never mention gas chambers, killing Jews, or anything holocaust-like. There are many which do mention transporting Jews out of these labor camps.
    Also note that the outbound train records which were kept have disappeared while the inbound records have not. Who benefits?
    http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/ww2decrypts.html
    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7581

    Pilecki nonsense demolished here:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=pilecki
    Schulter debunked here:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=+Eduard+Schulte

    , @Hippopotamusdrome


    WITOLD'S REPORT
    ...Basing on estimations done by those who worked close to that
    commando, over 2 million such people died.
    ...Colleagues, who were there and witnessed gassings of eight thousand people a day, quote the number of plus/minus five million people.

     

    Vs.


    United States Holocaust Mememorial Museum
    ...It is estimated that the SS and police deported at least 1.3 million people to the Auschwitz complex between 1940 and 1945. Of these, the camp authorities murdered approximately 1.1 million.

     

    , @SolontoCroesus
    "The Enemy Is Listening!"
    What Did the British Intelligence Service Know about the Holocaust?

    Christoph M. Wieland
    https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/8/1/4028

    On 19 May 1997, the British government transferred the decoded documents in Bletchley Park to the Public Records Office in London, thereby making them accessible to the public for research purposes.Oddly, only a very few Holocaust historians were interested in the information on the concentration camps. The reason for this astonishing lack of interest is presumably due to the following remark by author Hinsley:

    The messages from Auschwitz, the largest camp, with 20,000 inmates, mention disease as the chief cause of death, but also include references to executions by hanging and shooting. The decoded messages contain no references to gassings.
     

     
    This article is about Auschwitz and the knowledge Bletchley had about Jewish deaths there.

    But the article's author includes this observation to validate the fact that the Germans did react to Churchill's speech and did take action in an attempt to prevent knowledge of killings behind Red Army lines:


    An order was, in fact, actually issued on 13 September 1941 prohibiting all further reporting of victim numbers by radio, but, rather, ordering that all such figures be communicated by courier only; but this order only applied to the three Higher SS and Police Leaders (HSSPF).[22] On 24 August 1941, Winston Churchill had made the mistake, in a radio address, of denouncing the mass shootings carried out behind the Russian front by the German Ordnungspolizei [NS regular police].[23]

    Churchill's remarks remained, of course, very vague, but aroused the suspicion on the part of the head of the German Ordnungspolizei, Kurt Daluege, that the British had been eavesdropping on German radio reports. Daluege therefore issued an order to the heads of the Ordnungspolizei, deciphered by the British, prohibiting the mention, for the time being, of victim numbers by radio.

    In response to a suggestion by SS-Obergruppenführer Friedrich Jeckeln, the victim figures were not, however, deleted, but, rather, merely camouflaged, i.e., henceforth reported under the heading of "Action under the Customs of War."[24]
     

    The implication is that some, perhaps large-scale, killings of Soviets did take place.

    Notice that the validation of this fact, that large-scale killings of Russians took place, argues against the claim that Germans carried out deliberate extermination of Jews at Auschwitz. In the words of author C. Wieland:


    To sum up, the following facts may be considered established:
    The messages deciphered at Bletchley Park undoubtedly constitute one of the most reliable sources on the course of events during the Second World War.
    They provide information on undertakings of the German army, navy, and air force. They provide an insight into the events occurring behind the Russian front and the conditions in the concentration camps.
    Since the reports from Auschwitz contain no information on mass killings, the question of whether the British Intelligence Service "knew about the Holocaust," can be answered with a single word: "No!"[27]
     
    Joseph Bishop https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/1/3/3103 offers this chain of reasoning on why the role of the SS in exterminating Jews rose to prominence in (relatively) recent years (such that WizardofOz learned about it in a recent History channel broadcast): Bishop observes that the 'switch' to SS culpability for Holocaust occurred as Soviet archives were opened, evolving into reduction of the 6 million number of dead in concentration camps. To maintain that number, attention was shifted to Einsatzgruppen.

    Next, Bishop applies some basic maths to the situation: Even though Einsatzgruppen -- numbering about 2,000 -- were supplemented with "Police battalions, 'Schuma' (Schutzmannshaft, i.e. self-defense) companies of Ukrainians, Latvians et al, even sometimes Wehrmacht security divisions or elements thereof," they still were responsible for a geographic area almost the size of USA mainland; their numbers had to supply support units; they required vehicles and fuel for them at a time when supplying the German fighting force was the first priority.

    Next, Bishop assesses the "number of Jews available to be killed:"


    Revisionist researcher Dr. Walter Sanning in his path-breaking The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry demonstrated that the six million figure was impossible, that literally millions of European Jews had escaped the Nazis through legal emigration and through evacuation eastwards with the Red Army as it retreated before the invading German forces. We may never know how many 'Eastern' Jews escaped this way but the numbers are generally agreed upon to figure in the millions. The Germans simply did not have anywhere near the numbers of Jews in their control that the official Holocaust story presumes.
     
    Then Bishop tackles head-on the matter at hand, Bletchley Park and its decodes. He argues that the reports were, in at least some significant instances, falsified:

    "Of related interest is the issue of actual Einsatzgruppen after-action reports transmitted from the field to headquarters in Berlin. Many of these reports claimed whole regions to be 'cleansed' of Jews, i.e. which had become 'Judenfrei' (Jew-free) thanks to Einsatzgruppen actions. But a little known postwar trial, that of German Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, belied the accuracy of said reports. The Soviets were angry at von Manstein because of his many victories over the Red Army during the war and wanted him executed. They tried to claim that huge numbers of Jews were murdered in the rear areas by Einsatzgruppen under his overall command and that he was thus responsible. However, his British lawyer R. T. Paget demonstrated that whole areas supposedly cleared of Jews contained many flourishing Jewish communities that were actually fully functional and untouched throughout the entire war. Clearly the reports in this one area at least, were false or at least greatly exaggerated. The court looked closely at this and accepted the unreliability factor of Einsatzgruppen reports and von Manstein was acquitted. This issue of false reports being filed could be explainable via certain speculations, but more research is needed. Manstein himself did not reference the Einsatzgruppen or even Jews at all in his published memoirs.

    The actual Einsatzgruppen reports were also radioed to the SSHA (SS main headquarters office) in Berlin. British intelligence, monitoring such transmissions and having broken the German codes, received the reports but did not make much use of them during the war. Why not? Surely such information, if as damning to Germany as one might assume, would be priceless in the propaganda war. This is another area worth further study.

    Colin Heaton's masterly study of German anti-partisan operations in Europe makes clear that all rear-echelon units including SS, were overwhelmingly employed in anti-partisan duties. It is clear that even though the SS made a clear distinction between Jews as supporters of the Soviet regime, and ordinary Russians, Ukrainians, and others who were more often victims of that regime, anti-partisan warfare always had to take priority as rearward security was a prerequisite for any other type of operation."
     

    We know from works such as Benjamin Ginsberg's "How the Jews Defeated Hitler" that Jews actively collaborated with Communist Russia, in partisan as well as other ways, to attack the German army, so at least part of Bishops argument is plausible: SS killings concentrated on "partisan activities," and Jews were major members of those partisans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. @Harbinger
    What you have written is nothing but official, Jewish propaganda and nothing more.
    There was no extermination policy whatsoever, so much so that the offer still stands by author and respected historian David Irving of a cash reward for proof that there was.

    Jews were rounded up in all countries because they were communist subversives. They were sent to the work camps and not killed because they were instrumental in the German war effort. Work camps, not death camps had nurseries, hospitals, theatres, cinemas, bars and brothels for the Jews within. They were also paid camp money so as to buy from the camp stores.

    Hitler tried to send most of the Jews to Palestine but the world Jewish congress refused to pay him the $2million for all the Jews he wanted to send. Yes, you read that correctly. The Rothschilds, today with an estimated fortune of $500 trillion refused to pay the fee wanted to extradite Jews, from Europe, to Palestine or out of Europe.
    Already, they were creating the lie that would become the extermination of 6million Jews. Before WW2 even commenced, there were 100 mentions of 6million Jews dying somewhere in the world:
    http://balder.org/judea/Six-Million-140-Occurrences-Of-The-Word-Holocaust-And-The-Number-6,000,000-Before-The-Nuremberg-Trials-Began.php

    Any document that promotes the lie of the holocaust is propaganda and nothing else.
    And then of course there's this rabbi stating that not even 1million Jews died in WW2:
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ny-rabbi-not-even-1-million-jews-killed-in-holocaust/

    One can tell just how effective indoctrination truly is when goyim start defending Jews and promoting their lies. And more so, when they fail to realize that they've swallowed the lies hook, line and sinker this proves just how successful the indoctrination is. The more people read, watch and listen to the msm, the more they will believe the propaganda.

    What can be the point of this ridiculous trolling? Or do you ave a mental illness? Just the absurdity of your $2 million and $500 trillion figures without more saves me the trouble of wasting time on anything from “Harbinger”.

    Stlll I can’/t resist. Why would the Germans, so hardpressed for food and war production that they empluyed fit male and childless female deportees as forced labor who often died from starvation and related illness, bother to deport millions of Jewish old people, women and children, feed them and provide all the facilities you say they had (which even Wally would say had never been found – did the SS destroy all the evidences of their humane treatment of deportees?) ?

    Actually. Please make the world seem sane and rational. Tell me you are a naughty Jewish poltergeist seeing if you can make the Wally grade deniers look even more riduculous than they do without help.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harbinger
    Wizard of Oz,

    I have to state, that your moniker is incredibly appropriate. The Wizard of Oz, in L. Frank Baum's book was a snake oil salesman, a Professor Marvel I believe. More appropriately in the film, he created a fake wizard out of special effects, to make people believe there was an all powerful wizard, while deceiving people and telling them to "not look behind the curtain". And this is exactly what the Jew has done, throughout history, creating their smoke and mirrors as they've built facades for people to believe is reality. They are the masters of deceit.

    There were many agreements made of taking Jews from Europe, to Palestine. I was incorrect in the $2million figure, forgetting to put a '0' after the 2. This is what Hitler offered the Zionists to take all the Jews from Europe into Israel.
    However they declined.
    Not only did they decline but the lands they were in, that is the lands they'd infested, also declined to take the Jews, because you see, the 6million concoction was being brewed, along with the gas chambers fallacy, to give the Jew persecution status extraordinaire.
    As for the wealth of the Rothschilds, well, considering that they own the Federal Reserve, North, Central and Southern America, most of Africa, Australasia and pretty much all of Europe, that is of course through banking, then one begins to understand their wealth. When they took control of the British stock market in 1815 this made them incredibly wealthy. Only a fool would deny the true wealth of Rothschild banking cabal, possibly the family that's been responsible for over a billion deaths throughout its existence and untold suffering of billions more.

    The people who Hitler sent to the work camps, not death camps, but work camps as I've explained were communists. There is more than enough proof to show that there were many nationalist Jews fighting for Hitler in his armed forces and not just the lower ranks. There were many top brass who were Jews, loyal to the motherland, again, history lessons and msm productions conveniently forget about this.
    Did America not round up the Japanese and intern them, because they were at war with Japan, a war they instigated? Was Germany not at war against Jewry? Did they not start the war in 1933, launching a boycott against Germany, created at the World Jewish congress earlier?

    The starvation of the Jews, in the concentration camps was as a result of allied bombings of supply lines. This also led to no medicine getting in, resulting in natural deaths along with typhus and cholera. Figures, by the International Red Cross put the death tolls, in all camps at around 270,000 of which half of these were Jews. It is an Impartial Organization. It has no reason to lie.

    The thing is, you are the only troll I can see on this forum. When it comes to discussing the holocaust, what I see are the Jews who shout liar at anyone who provides evidence to prove the official narrative wrong and of course, try to character assassinate them, beginning with mental health issues. I notice that you have 'beef' with a Waly figure and ironically EVERYONE has beef with you.
    Interesting, like your name, your posts are not only laughable in that they promote official nonsense that's been thoroughly debunked but again, you will shout you are being persecuted, just like Jews throughout history, never asking why you are being persecuted.
    Here's a hint, start telling the truth and things may start to change for you and the rest of your tribe. If you ARE NOT a Jew, then I truly and I really mean I truly pity you for you are a prime example of indoctrination. You also are completely incapable of thinking critically to boot.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. @Rex Little

    By the stretch of anyone’s imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?
     
    I'd say the attack on Afghanistan was justified if in fact the Taliban was giving shelter to Al-Qaeda as was alleged. But once they were taken out, we should have left them with a warning that we'd be back if anything like that happened again.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2 (Japan attacked, Germany declared war against us) and the War of 1812 (Britain invaded).

    Even Afghanistan could have been dealt with – tell me someone if I am wrong – by threatening and executing continuous and escalating attack from the air until… e.g. ObL was given up (OK he escapes to Bora Bora so what next….?

    Doesn’t WW1 count according to just war theory because – as in the case of an individual helpng somebody who is being physically attacked – it is OK to defend those likely to be conquered and, for example, lose territory, if nothing is done. Ir was Germany and Austria-Hungary that started WW1, the mistakes of others being less culpable, arguably, than those of France and the UK leading up to WW2 (in any case irrelevant because Serbia had finally given Austrua-Hungary no excuse for its German supported attack).

    Germany might still have won in 1917 and the fact that the results if WW1 were not obviously improved by US intervention then and in 1919 and later is not to the present point.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Had not the USA interfered militarily in 1917 Britain would have had to capitulate in November 1917, hunger by the U boat sinkings.
    Donald McCormick, ‘The mask of Merlin, A Critical Study of David Lloyd George’, London, 1963
    The Balfour Declaration was the price Britain paid for being saved.
    But in fact the Palestinians paid the price, and, one might say, the whole Middle East since 1967, when De Gaulle stopped selling arms to Israel, and USA jewry decided to save Israel.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @Beefcake the Mighty
    She asked you a simple question, which you have not answered. Apart from offering up your usual long-winded blather (why are you unable to come to any damn point, man), you refer to the Wannsee Protocols, which even mainstream historians agree had little if anything to do with the conventional Holocaust narrative. And yes, there were mass shootings on the Eastern Front, but according to the Germans own documents these took place in the context of anti-partisan operations and the numbers killed are greatly exaggerated.

    An interesting intervention. Are you one of a tight little coven of obsessive denialists who knows that “Carroll [sic]” Price – or Wally – is female?

    I understand how anyone can be rendered mentally shortwinded by all the Holocaust denial bluster but it shouldn’t really be too difficult for you to understand the course of the conversation which related to something much narrower and more precise than the vast literature on gas chambers,Jews and others murdered etc.

    I offered Wally and other likeminded obsessives a chance to debunk in detail a very well made doco which – no one has denied – contains new material since people like you formed their settled views. Interesting that no one has cited previous reference to the heroic contribtions of Pilecki and Schulte – just same ol same old. ..

    So… have you seen the doco? Care to give (OK attempt) a Steve Sailer quality review?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Sorry, what document?
    , @sarz
    Wizard of Oz, this is the wrong forum to raise the challenge of your new documentary. No one who is seriously interested in the topic would be prompted to take a look based on your recommendation here. If you want a serious debate, go to the Forum at codoh.com and you can catch up on what they have already said. Put in your two cents' worth. Good luck. As for me, my mind is made up and I am sure that the Holocaust fable is a crock of shit and no amount of fiddling can any longer hope to shake the massive evidence that shows it.

    To Ron Unz: if any article in future hinges on the truth of the Holocaust story, spare your audience. It is a needless pissing away of something precious you have built. And I wish you could flush Fred Reed. He's a frightful bore.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. @Uncle Remus
    Perhaps you are pointing to one more oddity of the Bay area, Bay Area Guy, but Greeks elsewhere
    in America wear Greekness on their sleeves. Maybe you don't get around much.

    I do get around, but not nearly as much as I would like. I admit I am mostly confined to the Bay Area, where whites’ different ethnicities don’t matter – except for Jews; and in many ways, that proves my point. Since Jews here retain their ethnic identity while all other whites are merely white, that demonstrates how enduring Jewish identity really is.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. @Wizard of Oz
    "obviously" is a real marker of faith ahead of reason. Try looking at the film "The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust to start with - or you could start with Hitler's vicious rants against the Jews in Mein Kampf and elsewhere. We know Hitler and other leading Nazis wanted to cleanse German territory of Jews -
    initially to Palestine might have sufficed, especially if there was money in it, and the existence and behaviour of Einsatzgruppen had already proven that mass murder of Jews was as acceptable indeed desirable as killing Communist officials. (Remember the Germans own radio communications described it).
    Then you should brush up on the 20th January 1942 Wannsee conference because its records will set you right about The Final Solution [of the Jewish Question/Problem]. The German for that Die Endlösung der Judenfrage was used evidently to avoid recording such words as "killing" or "extermination" but it seems that there, where the need to speed up the program was top of the agenda, was where the use of gas beyond just carbon monoxide from exhaust was decided. I wonder why you think the Nazis rounded up hundreds of thousands of Jews in several countries including women, old people and children who would be useless as slave labor and shipped them, together with men who could do heavy work, to camps like Auschwicz? Wasn't killing them on arrival just the rational step to take by those running Himmler's SS industrial contribution to the war economy. They starved millions of Soviet POWs to death so what makes you think they were going to feed useless Jews in the camps. If they didn't want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!
    I think you'll find some obvious stuff in that... But do see the doco and open your mind to thought about what it tells you.

    Sorry Wiz, but when it comes to history, (particularly WW 2 history) Jew-run Hollywood would be the last place I’d look.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. Svigor says:

    John Derbyshire once commented in this vein, and I see too that whenever the J-word appears in the “rightwing blogosphere” an endless crowd of creepy-crawlies emerge from the deeper nooks and covers the space like busy maggots on a cadaver. Guys, have fun. However, if I were the editor of this blog, that on the whole is quite critical of the J-people, I’d shut you out.

    I generally refrain from the sort of lurid imagery (usually it’s more to do with bodily functions, the scatological in particular, in my experience) that Jews like to get into. Probably because I have actual arguments.

    You deserve your own special place. However, for general purpose blogs like this, the more Jews read the kind of deranged splatters you post, the more they are convinced that the Cossacks with sabers drawn are just a block away. They act accordingly… and they, not you, tilt things in this society. So we now have SPLC deciding for social media what’s “hate speech” or defamation. And the more you go on with this outpouring of crazy ordure, the tighter the screw will be. It would have been worth it, for the truth, but to suffer censorship because of the flare-ups of your fevered imagination, what a tremendous pity….

    Nothing’s ever going to convince the Jews that we aren’t Cossacks with the sabers out. Personally, I want Jews tightening the screws. The more you tighten your grip, Jews, the more goys will slip through your fingers. Jews have profited mightily from the status quo; I think turning up the heat serves white interests. Make Jews show what they really stand for. Trump’s election has been illuminating in this regard.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2 (Japan attacked, Germany declared war against us) and the War of 1812 (Britain invaded).

    Sorry, a declaration of war is not a jus casus belli. I also dislike the implication that jus casus belli is a blank check for total war (“you sank my battleship so I get to invade and flatten your country”).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moses

    Nothing’s ever going to convince the Jews that we aren’t Cossacks with the sabers out.
     
    Yeah. I came to the same conclusion. Paranoia is built into their operating system. Jews need enemies to keep their in-group/out-group barrier strong. So they evolved behavior that ensures enemies, real or imagined.

    The more you tighten your grip, Jews, the more goys will slip through your fingers.
     
    I see what you did there.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2
     
    American involvement in the European theater of WW2 was a monumental waste of blood and treasure. We had no dog in the fight other than ensuring the UK wasn't overrun.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. HEM says:

    White people don’t get it because they lack innate tribalism..

    Whites dissecting ethnocentric behavior is like Asians chatting among themselves about how it feels to run a 9.5 100m.

    Anybody who doesn’t see the potential problem with ANY ethnocentric group being massively over-represented in positions of power should probably stick to watching the ballgame.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    A quick response. I think I agree. But it is interesting to consider how the self interest of the ruling classes used to be so well accepted, with probably different explanations for different countries. In the US until 30 or 40 or maybe 50 years ago everyone could buy the myths about the available rewards for hard work, talent and enterprise so class based on almost nothing but wealth could prevail. N'est-ce pas? Also expectations were lower when large unplanned families were common. In the UK traditional respect for the landed aristocracy still had a place, like the world of clubs, but it was the rising tide (and colonial emigration to new lands and gold rushes) lifting all ships that mattered too and the British Empire and Royal Family must have had *something* going for them before 1914.... (not that there weren't plenty of down-with-the-rich politicians).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. @Wizard of Oz
    An interesting intervention. Are you one of a tight little coven of obsessive denialists who knows that "Carroll [sic]" Price - or Wally - is female?

    I understand how anyone can be rendered mentally shortwinded by all the Holocaust denial bluster but it shouldn't really be too difficult for you to understand the course of the conversation which related to something much narrower and more precise than the vast literature on gas chambers,Jews and others murdered etc.

    I offered Wally and other likeminded obsessives a chance to debunk in detail a very well made doco which - no one has denied - contains new material since people like you formed their settled views. Interesting that no one has cited previous reference to the heroic contribtions of Pilecki and Schulte - just same ol same old. ..

    So... have you seen the doco? Care to give (OK attempt) a Steve Sailer quality review?

    Sorry, what document?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I'm surprised that your part of the English speaking world doesn't recognise "doco" as meanng a documentary film - or that you didn't infer that I was referring to the recent French documentary film The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust in which for me the most interesting part was the discovery of Eduard Schulte as the great German hero but also its showing that the Germans freely boasting that they were not just murdering Russian partisans and Communists in the USSR but Jews of all ages as well.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. @Wally
    The Wannsee minutes say nothing about killing Jews and have been doctored. The provenance is laughable, see:
    'Wannsee Conference minutes debunked': https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1647
    and:
    The Wannsee Conference Protocol
    Anatomy of a Fabrication: http://codoh.com/library/document/934/

    The Germans wanted Jews out of Europe, so they deported them. No one questions that. So what?

    We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    man up, debate, & learn:
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    The minutes are both doctored and say nothing about killing Jews? Why doctor them if you’re not going to make them incriminating?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Rabid Zionist Kempner tried on other ways and utterly blew it.
    Read my posted links & learn.
    It's all there.

    Wannsee Conference minutes debunked’: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1647
    and:
    The Wannsee Conference Protocol
    Anatomy of a Fabrication: http://codoh.com/library/document/934/

    Please show us an actual German document which proves the impossible 'holocaust'.

    www.codoh.com

    , @Wizard of Oz
    Weĺl I don't suppose it's any secret that they were "doctored" at the outset so that what "die Endlösung der Judenfrage" meant wasn't spelled out for every chance reader to be able to blab about speeding up "extermination" to his churchgoing Mutti and girlfriend. What we should get from Wally is *the original undoctored minutes" that we know he bought for $50 million anonymously so he could protect the memory of his beloved Führer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. How much anti-Jewish hostility is there today in America? A lot? A little? Is it negligible? Potentially explosive? It is hard to tell because disliking Jews is often a firing offense, and a controlled press makes discussion impossible. A clue can perhaps be found in the comments sections of political websites where, protected by anonymity, commenters are often bitterly anti-Jewish. But then, these comments may, or may not, be the work of a few cranks.

    it is mostly brewing under the surface. I am sure it will make a huge explosion in the future, not sure when though.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  201. Svigor says:

    Wizard of Oz, asking people to open their minds to some Orthodox documentary is a bit rich. Jews do the opposite of opening their minds to the dialog of revisionists, which are a lot more extensive and nuanced than is even possible in a documentary.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  202. snag says:

    More expulsions, more pogroms and no place to run, it’s not a matter of if but when?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    That's one of the primary reasons Israel was created - to serve as last-ditch sanctuary to which Jews can flee when the SHTF.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. @Singh
    As long as jews consider everyone else goyim Cattle then everyone else is fine to retaliate. Same as the christian heathen muslim infidel complex।।

    People with such notions are not human.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾ।।ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ।।

    Singh tries to roar like a lion
    Confusedly babbling of Zion.
    What’s English: Impure.
    What’s Sanskrit: Obscure.
    But at least we can blame him for tryin’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. Wally says:
    @ANON
    Kindly prove that you have IQ points above the moronic by showing what is wrong with the points drawn from what you purport to be commenting on. Are there any of them uncheckable? Are any of them suggestive of fabrications? Did you know about Witold Pilecki and Eduard Schulte? Uf not, now that have heard of them what can you say that is not kindergsrten sandpit rhetoric?

    Pilecki demolished here:

    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=pilecki

    Schulte debunked here:

    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=+Eduard+Schulte

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Do you even bother to read the links you post? Of seven or so links provided at CODOH above, only two discuss the people involved to any extent.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. utu says:

    Jews of course have never been associated with burglary or picking pockets

    Fred, you are so ignorant. You should read stories of Jewish criminal underworld of Odessa or Warsaw or even London. Till now Polish and Russian criminal slangs are full of yiddishisms. Read some Isaak Babel stories. All these was retconned from history. For example did you hear about this guy?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abe_Greenthal
    Abraham Greenthal (January 9, 1822– November 17, 1889), known as “The General,” was an American criminal known as one of the most expert pickpockets in the nation. He was a thief and fence for more than 40 years, and led a nationwide ring of pickpockets.

    And obviously you should not forget Fagin from Oliver Twist which also is a good example of retconning. Dickens under pressure and with some financial incentive softened the portrayal of Fagin in subsequent editions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagin
    In later editions of the book, printed during his lifetime, Dickens excised over 180 instances of ‘Jew’ from the text.[9] This occurred after Dickens sold his London home in 1860 to a Jewish banker, James Davis, who objected to the emphasis on Fagin’s Jewishness in the novel. When he sold the house, Dickens allegedly told a friend: “The purchaser of Tavistock House will be a Jew Money-Lender” before later saying: “I must say that in all things the purchaser has behaved thoroughly well, and that I cannot call to mind any occasion when I have had moneydealings with anyone that has been so satisfactory, considerate and trusting.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  206. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    Wally - you'll be glad to know that some French documentary makers in 2015 made a film which I saw on Australia's Foxtel 's History Channel called approx. The Secret History of WW2 Ep 5 The Holocaust which will update your knowledge of something you care passionately about.

    I criticise it for saying weakly near the end that the Allied bombing of chemical plants not far from Auschwicz showed that they could have taken out the gas chambers when the most credible experts had already explained why neither bombing the railways nor attempting precision bombing would be a realistic option.

    You will enjoy just one thing and that is my second criticism. After more that once referring to the 3.5 to 4 million Jews the Nazis explicitly aimed to eliminate out of Europe's 11 million Jews it stated without elaboration near the end that 6 million Jews were murdered.

    That's the end of the joy for you because what has now been given air is all the information that was being given to the Allies, and its sources, from 1940 or 41 onwards.

    In late 1941 when he could do nothing about it Churchill received information from Enigma intercepts/transcripts that Jews were being murdered in the Soviet Union by shootings of thousands at a time (eventually amounting to about 1 million) and this was undeniable because it was from German supposedly secret communications.

    Then Witold Pilecki ( see Wikipedia entry if you haven't heard of him) began the process of getting precise information out of Auschwicz to the Polish Government in exile in London which of course was passed on to the major Allies. He had deliberately had himself arrested so he could join resistance people already in Auschwicz in 1940 with a view to organising a revolt, which proved impossible. His first communication of the reality, including the gas chambers, was in 1942 via the amazing escape of four Poles in a German car through the front gate. One, who died last year at the age of 98 was interviewed. His name, qv, was Kazimierz Piechowski.

    Later Pilecki escaped and survived the Warsaw uprising (but executed in 1949 by the Communists). His reports were shown so that, if one could read Polish, what was being narrated could be verified or falsified.

    But then the big one, who had to escape Germany in 1943 from which he went to Zurich and married his Jewish mistress. He was Eduard Schulte, an important German industrialist doing well financially out of the war it seems but secretly, as an upper class German, despising Hitler and the Nazis. He apparently got some of the earliest warnings about a deliberate extermination of the Jews out to the Allies via a Jewish banker in Zurich who promised not to reveal his name. A couple of historians were featured saying that research which eventually disclosed Schulte as the main reliable inside source of information was amongst their most satisfying, partly it seems because so difficult. But not in doubt.

    So, what do you make of this contemporaneous information about the carefully, euphemistically, described deliberate Final Solution to the Jewish Question? No, don't answer for a while. Consider.

    The “Holocau$t Industry” in court:
    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, … but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    “I owe my permission to submit the Zionist plan for the final solution of the Jewish Question.”
    - ‘a founding father of Zionism’, Theodor Herzl, letter to the Czar, November 22, 1899.

    Not a single British Bletchley Park intercept of secret German messages to and from Auschwitz and the so called ‘death camps’ never mention gas chambers, killing Jews, or anything holocaust-like. There are many which do mention transporting Jews out of these labor camps.
    Also note that the outbound train records which were kept have disappeared while the inbound records have not. Who benefits?

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/ww2decrypts.html

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7581

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Is there anything in all that which is really a reply to me? Your Bletchley Park point certainly is not. Indeed what is your point in mentioning it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. Paw says:
    @Reactionary Utopian
    Fred Reed.

    The Jews.

    Hmmmmm ... think I'll go make some popcorn. This is apt to be a long and colorful set of comments.

    Author is very carefully selective and in many words to say ordinary , nothing concrete.Avoiding everything inform or solve nothing.
    Wothless and useless and really just jelly.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    I have an adult life time of getting to recognise cranks, obsessives and the paranoid with or without a few above average IQ points and I am not interested in taking up debate with obsessive cranks on something which is not of great interest to me. I am however, willing to read anything carefully analytical by you, a regular UR commenter, which shows that you can, if you can, which I doubt, absorb what the doco film discloses and my points about it, and deal with them in detail.

    I don't even know whether you accept the facts about the Enigma intercept, the imprisonment in Auschwicz of Witold Pilecki (had you heard of him?), his communications to London, Eduard Schulte, and his anti Nazi activity? If these are new to you since you formed your Holocaust hoax views I wonder about the mental processes by which you accommodate them.

    But what hope should I hold when you don't even acknowledge my careful point about the 3.5 - 4 million versus the 6 million?

    There was no 3.5M 0r 6M. No ‘holocaust-lite’.
    The “Holocau$t Industry” in court:
    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, … but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    There is no proof, only easily debunked Zionist propagand
    Show it if you have it.

    - If there was ‘a plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ as alleged, then why are there countless numbers of so called “survivor$”?

    - If the alleged ‘holocaust’ was fact, then why are there laws in Europe to prevent scrutiny of it? What kind of “truth” needs to imprison people to prevent free speech?

    - If Jews are so sure that millions of Jews were murdered, then why do they ask such dumb questions like “what happened to them then?
    fact:
    Not a single British Bletchley Park intercept of secret German messages to and from Auschwitz and the so called ‘death camps’ never mention gas chambers, killing Jews, or anything holocaust-like. There are many which do mention transporting Jews out of these labor camps.
    Also note that the outbound train records which were kept have disappeared while the inbound records have not. Who benefits?

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/ww2decrypts.html

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7581

    Pilecki nonsense demolished here:

    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=pilecki

    Schulter debunked here:

    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=+Eduard+Schulte

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    What skeptics like myself would like to see is captured German documents detailing large volumes of fuel being delivered to death camps" with which to fire ovens used in disposing of hundreds and thousands of gassed victims on an hourly and daily basis. Since it's an established fact it takes a minimum of 90 minutes and thousands of BTU's (British Thermal Units) to dispose of a single human body, coupled with the fact that Germany suffered from critical shortages of fossil fuels throughout the entire war, how the miracle of the holocaust actually occurred. How about it Wiz? Did the doc, to which you refer address these and other such discrepancies?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. Moses says:
    @Svigor

    John Derbyshire once commented in this vein, and I see too that whenever the J-word appears in the “rightwing blogosphere” an endless crowd of creepy-crawlies emerge from the deeper nooks and covers the space like busy maggots on a cadaver. Guys, have fun. However, if I were the editor of this blog, that on the whole is quite critical of the J-people, I’d shut you out.
     
    I generally refrain from the sort of lurid imagery (usually it's more to do with bodily functions, the scatological in particular, in my experience) that Jews like to get into. Probably because I have actual arguments.

    You deserve your own special place. However, for general purpose blogs like this, the more Jews read the kind of deranged splatters you post, the more they are convinced that the Cossacks with sabers drawn are just a block away. They act accordingly… and they, not you, tilt things in this society. So we now have SPLC deciding for social media what’s “hate speech” or defamation. And the more you go on with this outpouring of crazy ordure, the tighter the screw will be. It would have been worth it, for the truth, but to suffer censorship because of the flare-ups of your fevered imagination, what a tremendous pity….
     
    Nothing's ever going to convince the Jews that we aren't Cossacks with the sabers out. Personally, I want Jews tightening the screws. The more you tighten your grip, Jews, the more goys will slip through your fingers. Jews have profited mightily from the status quo; I think turning up the heat serves white interests. Make Jews show what they really stand for. Trump's election has been illuminating in this regard.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2 (Japan attacked, Germany declared war against us) and the War of 1812 (Britain invaded).
     
    Sorry, a declaration of war is not a jus casus belli. I also dislike the implication that jus casus belli is a blank check for total war ("you sank my battleship so I get to invade and flatten your country").

    Nothing’s ever going to convince the Jews that we aren’t Cossacks with the sabers out.

    Yeah. I came to the same conclusion. Paranoia is built into their operating system. Jews need enemies to keep their in-group/out-group barrier strong. So they evolved behavior that ensures enemies, real or imagined.

    The more you tighten your grip, Jews, the more goys will slip through your fingers.

    I see what you did there.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2

    American involvement in the European theater of WW2 was a monumental waste of blood and treasure. We had no dog in the fight other than ensuring the UK wasn’t overrun.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. utu says:

    When the First Crusade took Jerusalem in 1099, the Christian armies immediately burned the synagogue with the Jews inside. Why? The Jews had no part in the war, which was between Muslims and Christians.

    Fred, you are so ignorant. Everything should be put in context. Jews have their share of killing and slaughtering others. Not just the horror stories in Bible (the ethnic cleansing and genocide manual) but already in Christian times:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitos_War
    “The Jews … waged war on the inhabitants throughout Libya in the most savage fashion, and to such an extent was the country wasted that, its cultivators having been slain, its land would have remained utterly depopulated, had not the Emperor Hadrian gathered settlers from other places and sent them thither, for the inhabitants had been wiped out.”

    “They would cook their flesh, make belts for themselves of their entrails, anoint themselves with their blood, and wear their skins for clothing. Many they sawed in two, from the head downwards. Others they would give to wild beasts and force still others to fight as gladiators. In all, consequently, two hundred and twenty thousand perished. In Egypt, also, they performed many similar deeds, and in Cyprus under the leadership of Artemio. There, likewise, two hundred and forty thousand perished. For this reason no Jew may set foot in that land”

    Greeks have the memory of the Kitos War. They do not buy the image of Jews as eternal innocent victims. Perhaps this the reason ADL ranks Greece as the most anti-Semitic country in Europe. Greeks won’t buy the BS image of Jews as always the innocent victims that successfully was sold and eaten up by almost everybody including the fools like you after the WWII. Give Jews some respect. It is a sign of patronizing anti-Semitism to see them only as victims. Respect them as real people who they are. They were also a-holes like real people always are.

    Read More
    • Agree: Talha
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  211. Wally says:
    @Amanda Huginkiss
    The minutes are both doctored and say nothing about killing Jews? Why doctor them if you’re not going to make them incriminating?

    Rabid Zionist Kempner tried on other ways and utterly blew it.
    Read my posted links & learn.
    It’s all there.

    Wannsee Conference minutes debunked’: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1647
    and:
    The Wannsee Conference Protocol
    Anatomy of a Fabrication: http://codoh.com/library/document/934/

    Please show us an actual German document which proves the impossible ‘holocaust’.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. RobinG says:
    @Rex Little

    By the stretch of anyone’s imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?
     
    I'd say the attack on Afghanistan was justified if in fact the Taliban was giving shelter to Al-Qaeda as was alleged. But once they were taken out, we should have left them with a warning that we'd be back if anything like that happened again.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2 (Japan attacked, Germany declared war against us) and the War of 1812 (Britain invaded).

    Looks like you don’t know that the Taliban offered to turn over Bin Laden … if the US could show proof that he was responsible or involved in 911. George Bush refused.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. @Amanda Huginkiss
    The minutes are both doctored and say nothing about killing Jews? Why doctor them if you’re not going to make them incriminating?

    Weĺl I don’t suppose it’s any secret that they were “doctored” at the outset so that what “die Endlösung der Judenfrage” meant wasn’t spelled out for every chance reader to be able to blab about speeding up “extermination” to his churchgoing Mutti and girlfriend. What we should get from Wally is *the original undoctored minutes” that we know he bought for $50 million anonymously so he could protect the memory of his beloved Führer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. MEFOBILLS says:
    @KenH

    Hitler’s complaints against the Jews were along usual lines, that Jews controlled German culture, finance, academia, and the media.
     
    This sentence is written as if Hitler's claims are self evidently false and he was just a mindless Jew hater. Jews were also way overrepresented as communist agitators. Again, examine the historical record instead of the usual propaganda and prevarications of appointed court historians.

    Four Jews on the Supreme Court? From two percent of the population?

     

    They are 2% of the general population but 44% of the SCOTUS. How many Palestinian Muslims and Christians are on the Israeli supreme court if Jews are so committed to diversity like they claim in the diaspora?

    Germans had legitimate grievances against the Jews.

    The Balfour document was called “stabbing in the back” by Germans. Germany had welcomed Jews into her economy more than any country up to that time.

    Germany had actually Won WW1, and Jews had maneuvered America to enter the war, so Zion could have Balfour.

    There was a preponderance of Jews at Versailles, and German’s were humiliated by being made to stand, then there was additional debt humiliations and stripping of German lands and industry.

    Then interwar years of debt leads directly to hyperinflation. Then Germany discovers during the hyperinflation that much of Germany had been bought up. Jews borrowed dollars from the friends in money centers such as london and wall street, and bought up Germany on the cheap.

    As late as 38 up to 1/3 of Germany was still under Jewish economic control.

    In other words, Jews backstabbed Germany, then helped cause Versailled conditions, then bought up the country during hyperinflation they helped start.

    Then to make it worse, Zion declared war on Germany in 33, which was an attempt to starve Germany out. Germany was not food independent in those years.

    Basically Jewish behavior was disgusting, murderous, and “grabbing.” You know if it is good for the tribe, then anything goes.

    Anti-semitism is a learned response. Anybody that sufficiently understands economics and economic history comes away with the understanding that throughout history, Jews have used usury to get over on others.

    Even the original Magna Carta was about Jews putting house to house in debt claims.

    Burning of Jewish homes was a Jubilee, because that is where the debts were stored.

    Nowadays, there is no way to Jubilee and get away from their usury magick game. If Jews don’t straighten up and fly right, then the world will vomit them out again, as individual countries have done some 160 times in the past.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    Then interwar years of debt leads directly to hyperinflation. Then Germany discovers during the hyperinflation that much of Germany had been bought up. Jews borrowed dollars from the friends in money centers such as london and wall street, and bought up Germany on the cheap.

    As late as 38 up to 1/3 of Germany was still under Jewish economic control.

    In other words, Jews backstabbed Germany, then helped cause Versailled conditions, then bought up the country during hyperinflation they helped start.

    Then to make it worse, Zion declared war on Germany in 33, which was an attempt to starve Germany out. Germany was not food independent in those years.
     
    Geez, what kind of nonsense.... Read something of substance.

    http://gen.lib.rus.ec/covers/343000/08ab756a0ec462eb98d3db29eea588b9-d.jpg

    http://gen.lib.rus.ec/covers/825000/1ddec87004c41e13597e95baae18b470-g.jpg

    http://gen.lib.rus.ec/covers/275000/2102af25484bfe4a70fc554050e082a9-d.jpg

    http://gen.lib.rus.ec/covers/122000/7c087ff23cc8595e736f7f191a070eb6-d.jpg

    http://gen.lib.rus.ec/covers/1451000/95356bf180cbd5b3a19917a7167dc988-d.jpg
    , @snag
    Jew can do no wrong, no sir ;)
    Bavarian Soviet Republic check who were the leaders and their goons.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavarian_Soviet_Republic
    https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
    , @KenH
    All true. In Mein Kampf Hitler revealed that he started out pro-Jewish or at least having no strong opinion either way. It was when he went to Vienna that he was able to observe Jewish behavior and see that German communism was disproportionately led by Jews.

    Jews have been kicked out of over 100 nations, so obviously they aren't as innocent as they claim.
    , @Avery
    I'll take your word for it that Germany had legitimate grievances against Jews.
    (I don't know the details of what transpired then)

    Had Hitler satisfied himself with the annexation of Germanic Austria and Sudetenland - both accepted by the two European powers of the day England and France - and simply _expelled_ Jews from Germany, without harming them, then you could have an argument.

    But when Hitler started invading European countries left and right, then the game was up.
    When he started rounding up civilians, children and have them mass-murdered, then the Nazis had to be wiped out one way or another.

    btw: what 'legitimate grievance' did Hitler have in invading USSR, which as is well known, was supplying Germany with all the raw materials she wanted? (... Soviet trains loaded with raw materials were headed due West even as Panzers were crossing the Soviet border).
    What 'legitimate grievance' did Hitler have in unleashing death and destruction on the Slavic peoples and killing and murdering ~15 million Soviet civilians, overwhelmingly Slavs?

    Germans have nobody to blame but themselves, and Hitler, and the Nazis.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Sorry, what document?

    I’m surprised that your part of the English speaking world doesn’t recognise “doco” as meanng a documentary film – or that you didn’t infer that I was referring to the recent French documentary film The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust in which for me the most interesting part was the discovery of Eduard Schulte as the great German hero but also its showing that the Germans freely boasting that they were not just murdering Russian partisans and Communists in the USSR but Jews of all ages as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. Fred Reed
    You should double check your points with Mr Phil Giraldi.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  217. ANON • Disclaimer says:
    @HEM
    White people don't get it because they lack innate tribalism..

    Whites dissecting ethnocentric behavior is like Asians chatting among themselves about how it feels to run a 9.5 100m.

    Anybody who doesn't see the potential problem with ANY ethnocentric group being massively over-represented in positions of power should probably stick to watching the ballgame.

    A quick response. I think I agree. But it is interesting to consider how the self interest of the ruling classes used to be so well accepted, with probably different explanations for different countries. In the US until 30 or 40 or maybe 50 years ago everyone could buy the myths about the available rewards for hard work, talent and enterprise so class based on almost nothing but wealth could prevail. N’est-ce pas? Also expectations were lower when large unplanned families were common. In the UK traditional respect for the landed aristocracy still had a place, like the world of clubs, but it was the rising tide (and colonial emigration to new lands and gold rushes) lifting all ships that mattered too and the British Empire and Royal Family must have had *something* going for them before 1914…. (not that there weren’t plenty of down-with-the-rich politicians).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. utu says:
    @Bardon Kaldian
    Fred writes on personal experience:

    Chutzpah: When I was seven we lived in Arlington, Virginia, next to the Furmans, recently someone said, of Hell’s Kitchen, which I didn’t know what was. The Furmans were by no means bad people. One day Mrs. Furman came over and gave my mother a hard time because my little brother, five was playing with a kid across the street instead of little Andrew Furman. Mom had done nothing to influence my brother’s choice of friends. She, a quietly genteel woman from the Southside of Virginia, was horrified by the aggressiveness. She told me of this decades later, so it clearly made a bad impression.
     
    I don't know Hebrew or Yiddish, but I doubt this is what "chutzpah" stands for. Mrs. Furman was, from what he writes, a pathetic figure worthy of pity. True, she was rude & perhaps hysterical.

    But this is a classic example of frustrated outsider who would like to fit in, an archetype of unhappy consciousness & enormous inferiority complex.

    Something completely opposite to arrogance & de haut en bas attitude.

    Yes, Holocaust made Mrs. Furman this way. Arrogant and insecure at the same time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. utu says:
    @Svigor

    I would assume that the low birth rate among Jews is, at least partially, due to an unusually high percentage of male and female Jews being homosexual.
     
    I remember my dad telling, back in the late eighties, that a lot of Jews are homosexual. It does seem to be true today, but I have no idea if it's "lot" enough to substantially impact their birth rates.

    Something completely opposite to arrogance & de haut en bas attitude.
     
    chutzpah.askdefine.com

    chutzpah n : (Yiddish) unbelievable gall; insolence; audacity [syn: chutzpa, hutzpah]

    Chutzpah != snobbishness.

    I can give you a recent example of chutzpah. After young American Jew in Israel was identified as the one who made 100+ threats to Jewish centers, synagogs and organizations in the US over period of several months after Trump was elected and all Americans, particularly whites and supporters of Trump were presumed to be responsible for the raising wave of anti-Semitism, Jewish media said: Never mind. It is irrelevant that the guy was Jewish. The threats were anti-Semitic nonetheless. Jews were victimized.

    What is the worst that nobody called them on it and nobody dared in MSM to call it by its name, i.e., the anti-semitic hoax perpetrated by a Jew to libel gentiles.

    The chutzpah would not exist if it did not work. And why does it work? It does not work on Jews because they are not polite to each other. But it works on gentiles because of gentile’s politeness. There is no polite defense against impudence and gall.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. utu says:
    @Carroll Price
    Wally's response would probably be similar to my own, which would be a request that you produce evidence of mass execution of Jews occurring at any of the work camps. Along with evidence that any Final Solution to the Jewish question ever existed anywhere other than in the minds of Jews who to this day are obsessed with the idea of making billions from an imaginary event that obviously never occurred.

    And what evidence would satisfy you? They did not have CCTV in crematoria or gas chambers or where the shootings were done, I am afraid. I they had and you could see it on YT you and Wally would scream: crisis actors, crisis actors, nobody dies like that, it’s fake bad acting.

    You should be honest and state that there is no evidence that you would be satisfied with. I am sure you are very skeptical about everything you have been told in school. I mean everything. Do you believe that Columbus made it to Hispaniola? Maybe it was a hoax he perpetrated on Spanish Crown to swindle it out of some cash?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    I suppose a proper forensic inspection of the sites in question, where millions of bodies were said to be buried in enormous graves, exhumed, and burned on open-air pyres would be a start.
    , @Astuteobservor II
    the biggest red flag for me personally is the fact all research into the matter is forbidden and asking questions because of the lack of research is criminal in some countries.

    anti-s has been used for the last 60 years to silence any and all criticism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. utu says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    Wally - you'll be glad to know that some French documentary makers in 2015 made a film which I saw on Australia's Foxtel 's History Channel called approx. The Secret History of WW2 Ep 5 The Holocaust which will update your knowledge of something you care passionately about.

    I criticise it for saying weakly near the end that the Allied bombing of chemical plants not far from Auschwicz showed that they could have taken out the gas chambers when the most credible experts had already explained why neither bombing the railways nor attempting precision bombing would be a realistic option.

    You will enjoy just one thing and that is my second criticism. After more that once referring to the 3.5 to 4 million Jews the Nazis explicitly aimed to eliminate out of Europe's 11 million Jews it stated without elaboration near the end that 6 million Jews were murdered.

    That's the end of the joy for you because what has now been given air is all the information that was being given to the Allies, and its sources, from 1940 or 41 onwards.

    In late 1941 when he could do nothing about it Churchill received information from Enigma intercepts/transcripts that Jews were being murdered in the Soviet Union by shootings of thousands at a time (eventually amounting to about 1 million) and this was undeniable because it was from German supposedly secret communications.

    Then Witold Pilecki ( see Wikipedia entry if you haven't heard of him) began the process of getting precise information out of Auschwicz to the Polish Government in exile in London which of course was passed on to the major Allies. He had deliberately had himself arrested so he could join resistance people already in Auschwicz in 1940 with a view to organising a revolt, which proved impossible. His first communication of the reality, including the gas chambers, was in 1942 via the amazing escape of four Poles in a German car through the front gate. One, who died last year at the age of 98 was interviewed. His name, qv, was Kazimierz Piechowski.

    Later Pilecki escaped and survived the Warsaw uprising (but executed in 1949 by the Communists). His reports were shown so that, if one could read Polish, what was being narrated could be verified or falsified.

    But then the big one, who had to escape Germany in 1943 from which he went to Zurich and married his Jewish mistress. He was Eduard Schulte, an important German industrialist doing well financially out of the war it seems but secretly, as an upper class German, despising Hitler and the Nazis. He apparently got some of the earliest warnings about a deliberate extermination of the Jews out to the Allies via a Jewish banker in Zurich who promised not to reveal his name. A couple of historians were featured saying that research which eventually disclosed Schulte as the main reliable inside source of information was amongst their most satisfying, partly it seems because so difficult. But not in doubt.

    So, what do you make of this contemporaneous information about the carefully, euphemistically, described deliberate Final Solution to the Jewish Question? No, don't answer for a while. Consider.

    Witold Pilecki wrote one short report in 1943 after he escaped from Auschwitz and one longer report in 1945 in Italy. In both reports gassings are mentioned. In the first one he writes about “experimental” gassing of Red Army officers in Block 11 in 1941 before Birkenau (Auschwitz II) was built. Gassings are mentioned as a matter of fact here and but are not the main part of the report which feels strange to us now.

    Did the first report make it to UK? If it did nobody made much of it. The reports were know to communists authorities after the war in Poland after he was arrested but it seems that they never were publicized until recently. It would be interesting to find out whether original manuscripts survived?

    I have read several memoirs by Auschwitz prisoners, some written already in 1945 and 1946. The gassings stories are there but what struck me that the sense of outrage is somewhat missing. Sometimes they make more out of cremation as cremation was novelty and against religion of Catholics and Orthodox Christians. In Greece just few years ago they finally managed to pass the law legalizing cremation. Why gassings did not outrage people there? Because people were killed in many ways there. And before WWII everybody believed that gas will be used in the next war. Almost everybody in Germany for Poland had a gas mask. The first gassings in Auschwitz were not of Jews. It was perceived as euthanasia of terminally sick or hopeless cases of Muselmann.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. utu says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    "obviously" is a real marker of faith ahead of reason. Try looking at the film "The Hidden Side of World War 2 Ep 5 The Holocaust to start with - or you could start with Hitler's vicious rants against the Jews in Mein Kampf and elsewhere. We know Hitler and other leading Nazis wanted to cleanse German territory of Jews -
    initially to Palestine might have sufficed, especially if there was money in it, and the existence and behaviour of Einsatzgruppen had already proven that mass murder of Jews was as acceptable indeed desirable as killing Communist officials. (Remember the Germans own radio communications described it).
    Then you should brush up on the 20th January 1942 Wannsee conference because its records will set you right about The Final Solution [of the Jewish Question/Problem]. The German for that Die Endlösung der Judenfrage was used evidently to avoid recording such words as "killing" or "extermination" but it seems that there, where the need to speed up the program was top of the agenda, was where the use of gas beyond just carbon monoxide from exhaust was decided. I wonder why you think the Nazis rounded up hundreds of thousands of Jews in several countries including women, old people and children who would be useless as slave labor and shipped them, together with men who could do heavy work, to camps like Auschwicz? Wasn't killing them on arrival just the rational step to take by those running Himmler's SS industrial contribution to the war economy. They starved millions of Soviet POWs to death so what makes you think they were going to feed useless Jews in the camps. If they didn't want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!
    I think you'll find some obvious stuff in that... But do see the doco and open your mind to thought about what it tells you.

    If they didn’t want to exterminate them they could have left all but fit working age males and childless women at home!

    Actually this is what was happening. From Warsaw Ghetto and Lodz Ghetto people who were not working were sent first. It seems that in places like Treblinka there was no selection for the arrivals and everybody was killed right away except for the skeletal workers crew. There was no industry around and workers were not needed. But Auschwitz was huge complex of camps and sub camps were workers were housed for factories in Silesia. For example when Hungarian Jews started arriving in 1944 some were killed right away and some were drafted to work. Strangely about 17,000 of Hungarian women were housed in a temporary camp and were not put to work (mortality was high) and many of them later were sent to other camps. Why they were not killed there? Why Ann Frank was not killed there? Or the case of Czech Jews from Theresienstadt who were kept in Birkenau for one year before being liquidated. Also Gypsies in Birkenau had a sub camp where they lived as whole families before being liquidated. There is something haphazard about the whole process of extermination as if it sometimes was done out of necessity for the lack of other options. So it was not always: kill all the Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Interesting. The film I mentioned told of Pilecki's first report delivered much earlier by four Poles who escaped, including one in his late 90s who was interviewd for the doco. They were made to memorise it so they wouldn't be caught with a written one.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. utu says:
    @Harbinger
    Fred Reed,

    Any people, not of a land, who move to live in that land and who do not integrate but segregate themselves off from the population are a problem. They are, what history has told us, a fifth column.

    Now you could use the Amish, for example, who do not integrate into western society to parallel the situation with Jews, as being nothing wrong, choosing to live their own lives outwith the indigenous population, but there is a HUGE difference between the Amish and the Jews.

    Firstly, the Amish are Christians. They believe in the golden rule - do unto others as you would unto you. Jews, do not believe in this rule. Their Babylonian Talmud, the primary teaching literature of rabbis specifically states that it is perfectly acceptable to steal from, enslave, assault, rape and murder non Jews with no incrimination. This book (including the Old Testament) teaches that Jews are superior to all non Jews (goyim).

    Secondly, the Amish live within their communities and sell their produce to the non Amish. This is where their interaction with non Amish stops. Jews, on the other hand seek positions of power with which to influence the running of the country that they make up 1% of. They are the hair, controlling the tail that's wagging the dog. They attain positions in government, in the judiciary, in academia, in the msm, in the entertainment industries, in the armed forces along with creating anti white, heterosexual organizations for all minorities with grievances.

    With their presence in the government they lobby to wage war on countries that pose the west no threat, sending in non Jewish troops to kill and be killed. In doing so they bring hatred towards westerners, previously not there.
    With their control within the judiciary, they fight to destroy the constitution in the USA along with indigenous freedoms within the rest of the west. They create legislation upon legislation that makes everything but passing wind illegal and thus an offense.
    With their control in academia, they make sure most of the truth remains hidden, indoctrinating non Jews into believing that Jews are completely innocent and what happened to them in the past, such as being kicked out of every land they've been in wasn't as a result of typically bad Jewish behaviour, but instead a hatred for Jews. They also make sure that Jews and other minorities are over represented within universities and the whites vastly under represented. They also use academia to teach their cultural Marxism, turning society into drones.
    With their control within the msm they use this as an indoctrination tool, no differently to what they do in academia, turning truths into lies and lies into truths, promoting that which shouldn't be promoted and not promoting that which should.
    With their control of the entertainment industry; through the film industry they create their propaganda movies. Through the music industry they corrupt the youth promoting homosexuals and feminist women as role models. Through the sports industries they keep people drawn away from what's really going on around them and of late, have politicized it.
    Through their control of the armed forces, top brass work with the judiciary and the government to make sure war happens, while they sit back and watch millions of goyim subordinates kill one another, again a replay of WW1 and those who created the wars, sitting miles away from front lines, out of harms way.

    And what of the average Jew?
    Well what of the average Jew? How many Jews are campaigning to see all the above corruption removed? I don't see any, do you? The complicity of the Jew, is their silence. When one does a survey of Jews and their views of Zionism, you will find that they all overwhelmingly support the Jewish state.

    The Jew is the eternal parasite. They remain in the west because no parasite ever leaves its host, unless there's another one nearby.
    All one needs to do is look at their kol nidre prayer and festival of Yom Kippur. This speaks volumes, as the prayer absolves Jews of honouring all deals with non Jews in the coming year.

    The public are 99% oblivious to Jewry due to their control in all of the above establishments. They are destroying the second amendment and have brought hate speech in, throughout the west, because they know that it's only a matter of time, courtesy of the internet, that more and more people will wake up to see what they truly are and what they have done that has caused so much misery in this world. They are rapidly destroying freedom of speech in order to have the freedom to incriminate anyone who speaks the truth on them. The Jews are terrified of the non Jewish majority finding out because the next 'holocaust' will see their extinction and they know it.

    This is the future of the Jews. They either perish, as they rightly should or will turn this world into one big Gaza strip, one big open air prison, where they can continue to feed off of the goyim and prosper as they have.

    And finally, Jews are only successful because they are part of the 'big club'. As a Jew doors are opened for you in ALL establishments. Every industry out there is run by Jews. The film industry is full of Jew directors, producers, screen writers, actors and actresses, again disproportionately representing their ethnic demographic. And because these actors, actresses and musicians are foisted upon us, we are brainwashed into believing that the Jews are the best. Again, it's a lie. Yet more Jewish perfidy promoting itself as reality.

    They either perish, as they rightly should or will turn this world into one big Gaza strip

    I have no doubt that there are some Jews who are very cognizant of the fact that the full spectrum domination of society is the only way for Jews to remain Jews in this world. It is either conquer or perish. The perishing for them is ceasing to be Jewish. They rather risk a biological annihilation while trying to conquer the world. After WWII and Holocaust they will not take any chances. For them it is us or them question.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harbinger
    Utu

    "After WWII and Holocaust they will not take any chances."
     
    The figures of Jewish dead in WW2 is grossly exaggerated and the lies have been promoted in order to allow Israel to grow, resting on the propaganda view that Jews need their own homeland in order to live and not be persecuted.
    Hitler would not have had his dislike of Jews had it not been for the fact that after coming home from the trenches in WW2, he saw communists, all Jewish causing chaos in his country. And as many people have correctly stated - communism IS Judaism IS Zionism. This is their father, son and the holy ghost.

    It is either us or them and people do not realize this one bit. It's a real problem. They still haven't bothered to work out just who is behind the mass immigration into the west. They are not interested when Jews speak of white genocide but froth at the mouth when anyone speaks out against Jews. It's laugable to say the least.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. It’s pity that because of raving antisemitic lunatics one cannot engage in dispassionate criticism of some negative or ambiguous Jewish traits that seem to persist over centuries & are more prominent in the modern world.

    * extreme ethno-centrism. If you’re guest in another person’s house & are becoming too powerful- the host will resent this. Even if most of you assimilate, there will remain a remnant that will stubbornly refuse to ethically disappear, while holding power in many important areas. French Huguenots, immensely successful group, disappeared in Prussian & English societies. What if they retained their identity?

    * it is all about wealth & success in material matters. Who cares about influential Jewish violin virtuosi, tailors or sex workers?

    * the Talmud myth. Jewish community, at least reformed one, should openly acknowledge there are some problematic passages in the Talmud with regard to Gentiles & Christians. Babylonian Talmud was composed from ca. 200-600 AD; it has 6,500 big folio pages & its English translation runs over 15,000 pages. So- why not openly say there are a few insulting passages that reflect early medieval spirit of times? Talmud is a mixture of wisdom literature (similar to Confucian “Analects”), various superstitions on magic & astrology, exegeses on murky passages of Hebrew Bible (frequently fantastic & hilarious), and mostly a codification of Jewish law, similar to Islamic shariah (agriculture, marriage, various taboos & ceremonies, crimes & misdemeanors, food etc.)

    Christianity was mentioned only a few times in this library of books, almost always in negative light. Why not publicly say it’s obsolete in some areas? And that such fellows are, basically, freaks:

    * why make shoah a dogma? Except for nuts, it is evident that many Jews (and assimilated French, Germans, Poles, Dutch…of partly or wholly Jewish extraction) were murdered by Nazi regime. A figure of victims? I don’t know, I think it goes from 4 to 6 million. Why insist on 6 million figure as a dogma?

    * why play eternal victim & not admit your participation in mass atrocities in central & eastern Europe? Of course, Communist 1917 revolution was not some Jewish plot, but after Soviet occupation of, say, Hungary or Poland in 1945, way too many Soviet lapdogs & enthusiastic supporters of new, unpopular & terrorist regimes, were local Jews. Why not say it open & loud?

    * why deny nepotism & clannishness in many areas in US life? Disney was a non-Jewish media empire & after old man’s demise, his son let in a Jew to manage business. This guy virtually imported any Jew he knew. Now, Disney corporation top level is more than 90% Jewish. How come? It was supremely successful without Jews, and now it’s Jews all over the place. Do these executives know anyone who is not Jewish? Pure nepotism.

    Te same goes for US media conglomerates, 5 out of 6 being in, nominally, Jewish hands. Coincidence? Doubt it, more like Mafia-type behavior. Don’t say that WASPs or Italo-Americans are so dumb they cannot function in this business (see Italy’s Berlusconi). Clannishness & nepotism again.

    I could go on & on. Antisemitic stereotypes are basically lunatic. But- why not admit the existence of some unpleasant & irritating characteristics typifying your collective behavior?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Maple Curtain
    "I could go on & on," i.e. with examples of destructive ethnocentric Jewish behaviour, but,

    "Antisemitic stereotypes are basically lunatic."

    Schizophrenia, or merely extreme cognitive dissonance?

    , @Tac
    It is precisely you, a Jew sayanim and/or a goy sympathizer, who stands as the last defender of this historical trail of deceit. You hide behing a veil of anonymity yet you continue to spew propaganda in your fervently unshakable and inbred belief that you are some hero, a protectorate of the said "persecuted" Jews"--yet you are no such affirmation.

    The days of your manipulation and deception are just about over; given your disproportionate influence to both maim and kill innocuously those ordinary citizens you should consider your afterlife arrangements, but not according to your Talmud--which was only constructed to form legions of subservient drones (bible syncophats of Jews/Evangelical Christian hordes) that question no authority.

    We will resist such endeavors till the last drop ... Your days are numbered!!!

    Just a preview:
    https://youtu.be/4MYPzKNQUE0

    , @Seraphim
    Why indeed?
    Your list of ' some unpleasant & irritating characteristics' is precisely the list of the 'lunatic anti-semitic stereotypes'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  225. The Jews that Nepalis meet are almost exclusively Israelis. They travel in packs, fresh out of their military service, and are hideously arrogant. For many years I have watched them cheat their way through India and can’t imagine them being any different in Nepal. I’ve spent a lifetime not being anti-Semitic but I can’t deny what I’ve seen time and again in India and Thailand over a period of two decades. To an Israeli, the whole world is Palestinians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    http://www.israelhayom.com/2017/07/23/travel-warning-obnoxious-israeli-backpackers-a-hazard-in-chile/
    Travel warning: 'Obnoxious? Israeli backpackers a hazard in Chile

    According to Lonely Planet’s new Chile edition, Israelis are listed among the hazards visitors can expect to encounter in the South American country, alongside random volcano eruptions, earthquakes, high crime rates in some cities and sandflies.
    , @anonymous
    Another small example (2).

    https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/gk-current-affairs/story/5-places-in-india-where-indians-are-not-allowed-317528-2016-04-12

    Even if this is only a small isolated example, it is comedic how Indians love the racist Israhellis. A common hatred of Islam has done wonders in getting the dark-skin hating pseudo-monotheists, into a loving embrace with the dark-skin heathens.

    To be clear, I make reference to "dark-skin" only to make a point about those racist cultists. The heathen reference is accurate.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. Stogumber says:

    There’s in this article too much “seem to be” and “in the eyes of”. Can Reed not speak about objective facts? Has he no intellectual means to find them out? Doesn’t he dare to find them out?

    Reading Reed, I really admire Walt and Mearsheimer in “The Israel Lobby”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  227. sarz says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    An interesting intervention. Are you one of a tight little coven of obsessive denialists who knows that "Carroll [sic]" Price - or Wally - is female?

    I understand how anyone can be rendered mentally shortwinded by all the Holocaust denial bluster but it shouldn't really be too difficult for you to understand the course of the conversation which related to something much narrower and more precise than the vast literature on gas chambers,Jews and others murdered etc.

    I offered Wally and other likeminded obsessives a chance to debunk in detail a very well made doco which - no one has denied - contains new material since people like you formed their settled views. Interesting that no one has cited previous reference to the heroic contribtions of Pilecki and Schulte - just same ol same old. ..

    So... have you seen the doco? Care to give (OK attempt) a Steve Sailer quality review?

    Wizard of Oz, this is the wrong forum to raise the challenge of your new documentary. No one who is seriously interested in the topic would be prompted to take a look based on your recommendation here. If you want a serious debate, go to the Forum at codoh.com and you can catch up on what they have already said. Put in your two cents’ worth. Good luck. As for me, my mind is made up and I am sure that the Holocaust fable is a crock of shit and no amount of fiddling can any longer hope to shake the massive evidence that shows it.

    To Ron Unz: if any article in future hinges on the truth of the Holocaust story, spare your audience. It is a needless pissing away of something precious you have built. And I wish you could flush Fred Reed. He’s a frightful bore.

    Read More
    • Agree: Cloak And Dagger
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  228. @pyrrhus
    The problems are twofold: that most Jews have divided loyalties, of which the loyalty to Israel and their ethnicity generally reigns supreme.A man cannot serve two masters. Hence Israel can have 3 walls and reject any immigrants, but America can't do the same; and second, that Jews do not have the same ethical standards regarding the goyim, whom they regard as chumps to be fleeced, as the goyim have toward them. A subset of that fact is that Jews are highly nepotistic toward their ethnicity, yet scream anti-semitism anytime they don't get preferred treatment.
    There are obviously a fair number of exceptions, but the overall effect is of a parasite gnawing its way through American society.

    “A subset of that fact is that Jews are highly nepotistic toward their ethnicity”

    1) I’m 84, a jew. I have never experienced preference from other jews because I am jewish or seen preference by jews towards another because he/she was jewish. I rack my brains, I have never seen it happen or able to infer such a presumably hidden transaction indirectly.

    2) How would this non-jewish commenter conceivably know of such transactions presumably hidden from view? Either he has magical powers of observation or he is seeing a chimera.

    Read More
    • Replies: @neutral
    It's just a gigantic coincidence that all the Hollywood bosses are jews, the same applies to the mass media and mass finance. Just one gigantic cohenincedence...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  229. @Max Denken
    John Derbyshire once commented in this vein, and I see too that whenever the J-word appears in the "rightwing blogosphere" an endless crowd of creepy-crawlies emerge from the deeper nooks and covers the space like busy maggots on a cadaver. Guys, have fun. However, if I were the editor of this blog, that on the whole is quite critical of the J-people, I'd shut you out.

    You deserve your own special place. However, for general purpose blogs like this, the more Jews read the kind of deranged splatters you post, the more they are convinced that the Cossacks with sabers drawn are just a block away. They act accordingly... and they, not you, tilt things in this society. So we now have SPLC deciding for social media what's "hate speech" or defamation. And the more you go on with this outpouring of crazy ordure, the tighter the screw will be. It would have been worth it, for the truth, but to suffer censorship because of the flare-ups of your fevered imagination, what a tremendous pity....

    Over and out.

    ‘You deserve your own special place.’ Ghettos?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Max Denken
    Not at all. Freedom of speech. What I meant is your own website, chat room. And you already have them: Vanguard, Stormfront, Balder, Majority Rights and dozens of lesser ones. Why troll here? You are of a different faith, no different from Muslims, Chasidic Jews or snake-kissing charismatics. And all you want is to argue the merits of your religion to the infidels. It's silly.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  230. Vojkan says:

    Why Jews are disliked? Because they pretend to be God’s gift to the mankind and having acquired control of much of public life, condemn to ostracism anyone who doesn’t share their high opinion of themselves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Vojkan
    Why many people hate Jews? Because of, in no particular order, Thomas Friedman, Charles Krauthammer, the Kristol family, Israeli policies, Bernard-Henry Lévy, Jacques Attali, the oligarchs in Russia, Roman Polanski, Goldman-Sachs, George Soros, the Rotschild family, all whose contribution to mankind is to say the least doubtful, yet who are hardly bearable braggers, because the bad among Jews have far greater visibility than the good among them, because people who have committed no crime against Jews are fed up with their constant claims to victimhood, because..., I could go on until tomorrow.
    Now, if Jews want people to start looking at them differently than what they have for the past couple of thousand years, a bit of honest introspection wouldn't do them damage.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  231. Gapeseed says:

    Probable above-average intelligence, a long-term perspective, emphasis on education, and in-group preferences compound nicely over generations. Instead of complaining about it, it would be nice if more of my fellow Catholics emulated Jews where they can.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Vojkan
    Above-average intelligence? C'mon. I have spent 36 years in France, met and worked with people of all races and many religions, among them many Jews, none of whom struck me with genius. Blowing hot air, they knew all, copying other people's work they knew too, being creative... well, if you consider plagiarism as creativity because you've never heard of the original work, maybe.
    Gosh, I had a university teacher who told me face to face that an exposé I did was too good written and that he didn't know to write like that and that I definitely didn't write it myself, though he had no proof of what he was saying, but he couldn't give me the grade the exposé deserved, and I have examples like that a lot, not only from personal experience but also from other people's experience. Now if I had sucked up to them, repeating ad nauseam how great they were, maybe I would have got better grades.
    There are probably people with above average intelligence among them but I have seen no evidence that there were more among them than among any other group of people. The only reasons I see for their overrepresentation is that they have better material base to start from, which wasn't always acquired in the most honest manner, and their sense of solidarity with each other which I admit is a great quality. But I have never seen a single clue, let alone evidence, that they are the God's "chosen", on the contrary.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  232. Vojkan says:
    @Vojkan
    Why Jews are disliked? Because they pretend to be God's gift to the mankind and having acquired control of much of public life, condemn to ostracism anyone who doesn't share their high opinion of themselves.

    Why many people hate Jews? Because of, in no particular order, Thomas Friedman, Charles Krauthammer, the Kristol family, Israeli policies, Bernard-Henry Lévy, Jacques Attali, the oligarchs in Russia, Roman Polanski, Goldman-Sachs, George Soros, the Rotschild family, all whose contribution to mankind is to say the least doubtful, yet who are hardly bearable braggers, because the bad among Jews have far greater visibility than the good among them, because people who have committed no crime against Jews are fed up with their constant claims to victimhood, because…, I could go on until tomorrow.
    Now, if Jews want people to start looking at them differently than what they have for the past couple of thousand years, a bit of honest introspection wouldn’t do them damage.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  233. Flip says:
    @Bay Area Guy
    Also, are you sure that there are four Jewish Supreme Court justices? I believe that only three - Breyer, Ginsburg, and Kagan - are Jewish.

    There are three. Garland would have been the fourth (and then kiss Heller goodbye). Senator McConnell saved gun rights in America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    "Senator McConnell saved gun rights in America."

    That's the funniest thing I've read this year so far.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  234. @utu
    And what evidence would satisfy you? They did not have CCTV in crematoria or gas chambers or where the shootings were done, I am afraid. I they had and you could see it on YT you and Wally would scream: crisis actors, crisis actors, nobody dies like that, it's fake bad acting.

    You should be honest and state that there is no evidence that you would be satisfied with. I am sure you are very skeptical about everything you have been told in school. I mean everything. Do you believe that Columbus made it to Hispaniola? Maybe it was a hoax he perpetrated on Spanish Crown to swindle it out of some cash?

    I suppose a proper forensic inspection of the sites in question, where millions of bodies were said to be buried in enormous graves, exhumed, and burned on open-air pyres would be a start.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    Utu- like Raul Hillberg- is "at a loss" when asked to present any physical evidence for ANY mass graves, traces of remains, traces of cremains, etc. commensurate with the b.s. Shoah Business narrative.

    The gold standard for the investigation of mass killing sites was and remains the Germans' investigation into the mass graves of the Polish officers and other prominent Poles at Katyn. Upon locating the mass graves, the Germans brought in a team of forensic investigators in addition to observers from neutral nations and even American, British, and French prisoners of war as impartial witnesses. Even the Russian government finally admitted that the massacre was the work of the NKVD. Despite the fact that it was a Soviet crime- which was an open secret- this did not keep the Nuremberg IMT from indicting the Germans for the crime. This, in itself, is a huge blot on that great show trial.

    No mass graves commensurate with the Shoah narrative of millions, even hundreds of thousands, murdered by the Germans have ever been located. Nor are there any physical traces of the fantastically absurd "Aktion 1005" during which, it is alleged, the mass graves of the Aktion Reinhardt victims- 3,000,000 or so Jewish victims- were excavated, the bodies exhumed and burned on outdoor cremation pyres. None. Those Soviet, Polish Underground, International Zionist propagandists and British psychological warfare experts, etc., who created the Holocaust legend out of whole cloth obviously did not understand the logistical aspects of such an operation. Nor did they comprehend its technical aspects.

    The "Holocaust" can only remain tenable as a pseudo-religious, nebulous and generalized narrative. It undergoes complete collapse at the factual, empirical and discrete level.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  235. ” It is strange: Jews have been disliked everywhere and in all times ”

    Wrong, not the sephardic jews from Spain and Portugal in 17th century Holland.
    They were a separate community, but that was all.

    Assimilated jews in GB and Vienna also were not disliked.
    It was the other way round, when Galician railways around 1890 made the jewish middlemen superfluous, and they went as beggars to Vienna, the assimilated jews there became antisemitic

    Klaus Hödl, ‘Als Bettler in die Leopoldstadt, Galizische Juden auf dem Weg nach Wien’, Wien, 1994

    After jews were driven from the Iberian peninsula they were also welcome in the Ottoman empire.
    The population there disliked the asjekenazi jews, but hardly the sephardic ones from the Iberian pensinsula.
    Cannot now remember how to reference this.

    The explanation, hotly contested by many jews, for me is that asjkenazi jews are not semites, but descendants od the Asiatic Khazars.
    Shlomo Sand, ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’, London, New York, 2009, 2010 (Tel Aviv, 2008, hebrew)

    Even recently Israeli askenazi jews discriminated the sephardic ones
    Ralph Giordano, ‘Israel um Himmels willen Israel’, 1993 Köln
    Giordano, a German with an Italian father and a jewish mother, travelled extensively in Israel.
    Israel is run by asjkenazi jews, many sephardic jews leave Israel disillusioned, most for the USA.
    Google Giladi for one experience.

    About jewish future, it would not suprise me if what Henry Ford said again becomes true ‘in the end most jewish projects fail through overconfidence’.
    Who will win, Deep State or Trump, remains to be seen, but whatever, the days of the USA empire are over.

    Forgot to write that jews were a eyesore to the catholic church, they made it clear that the might of the pope was not universal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    jilles, does "Ashkenazi," refers to all European Jews -- Jews from Poland, Russia, Hungary etc. as well as from Germany - Austria?

    If yes, specifically, that Ashkenazi includes German Jews, then are you able to say what is the level of dominance of German Jews in Israel?

    It is my impression that most of the Jews who are in charge in Israel today are from Poland, Lithuania, Russia, etc, but NOT German Jews, but that's just an impression.
    , @SolontoCroesus

    Assimilated jews in GB and Vienna also were not disliked.
    It was the other way round, when Galician railways around 1890 made the jewish middlemen superfluous, and they went as beggars to Vienna, the assimilated jews there became antisemitic
     
    Fascinating.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  236. @Wizard of Oz
    Even Afghanistan could have been dealt with - tell me someone if I am wrong - by threatening and executing continuous and escalating attack from the air until... e.g. ObL was given up (OK he escapes to Bora Bora so what next....?

    Doesn't WW1 count according to just war theory because - as in the case of an individual helpng somebody who is being physically attacked - it is OK to defend those likely to be conquered and, for example, lose territory, if nothing is done. Ir was Germany and Austria-Hungary that started WW1, the mistakes of others being less culpable, arguably, than those of France and the UK leading up to WW2 (in any case irrelevant because Serbia had finally given Austrua-Hungary no excuse for its German supported attack).

    Germany might still have won in 1917 and the fact that the results if WW1 were not obviously improved by US intervention then and in 1919 and later is not to the present point.

    Had not the USA interfered militarily in 1917 Britain would have had to capitulate in November 1917, hunger by the U boat sinkings.
    Donald McCormick, ‘The mask of Merlin, A Critical Study of David Lloyd George’, London, 1963
    The Balfour Declaration was the price Britain paid for being saved.
    But in fact the Palestinians paid the price, and, one might say, the whole Middle East since 1967, when De Gaulle stopped selling arms to Israel, and USA jewry decided to save Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    The fantasy alternative history comes to mind that, before increasing numbers of Arabs in Palestine came head to head with increasing numbers of Jews spreading to wherever they could buy land and supported from America as early as the 20s, Britain should have urganised Hong Kong or Singapore for the Jews in Palestine, presumably round Jaffa/Tel Aviv plus *some* religion related rights in Jerusalem. All done in about 1922 with Turkish assistance or acquiescence and some support from Palestinian Arabs who could see profit. Why could this never have been more than fantasy if that is the truth? Now I fantasize that Palestinian city states, backed by big money, could be set up on the West Bank so that at least the richer more successful Palestinians would enjoy profit from the tradeoff.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    The fantasy alternative history comes to mind that, before increasing numbers of Arabs in Palestine came head to head with increasing numbers of Jews spreading to wherever they could buy land and supported from America as early as the 20s, Britain should have urganised Hong Kong or Singapore for the Jews in Palestine, presumably round Jaffa/Tel Aviv plus *some* religion related rights in Jerusalem. All done in about 1922 with Turkish assistance or acquiescence and some support from Palestinian Arabs who could see profit. Why could this never have been more than fantasy if that is the truth? Now I fantasize that Palestinian city states, backed by big money, could be set up on the West Bank so that at least the richer more successful Palestinians would enjoy profit from the tradeoff.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  237. Kingfelix says:

    “Jews of course have never been associated with burglary or picking pockets…”

    Gave up reading at this point, how seriously can one take a writer unfamiliar with Fagin of Oliver Twist?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  238. sb says:

    It is pretty widely acknowledged by those familiar with workers in the Asian tourist industry ( non Muslim division ) that Israelis are the most disliked nationality by far .
    If there is a major reason why it’s probably something to do with making no attempt to be friendly rather than being tight arses ( plenty of people are tight – the English come to mind -but others do it with a smile )

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  239. mp says:

    Jews have been expelled from country after country, excluded from polite society, subjected to quotas,and required to live in certain regions. Why?

    I don’t know, Fred. But my old man used to tell me that if just one or two people didn’t like you, it might be their problem. On the other hand, if everyone doesn’t like you, it’s probably not everyone’s problem, and you need to start looking in the mirror for answers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  240. prusmc says: • Website
    @KenH

    This explains why Jews do not like Christianity,
     
    That was in 1099. I could give a F who did what to whom that long ago. But with Jews their motto is "never forgive, never forget". Even when they've lived better in white Christian nations than in any other they still work to undermine the white Christians they live among. That their historical grudges have an endless shelf life is reason to hate them and bar them from living in our nations.

    Importantly, Jewish presence is seen as Jewish conspiracy. Four Jews on the Supreme Court?
     
    Right. When Jews are overrepresented in any field it's because they're so darn smart. It whites are overrepresented in their own friggin countries then Jews lecture us about unearned white privilege. This is why I and a growing number of whites hate them. And it just so happens that all four Jews represent the totalitarian left wing of the court who consistently vote against white American interests. Another reason they're hated.

    I won't waste too much time since Fred's writing philo-semitic propaganda and taking pot shots at anyone who doesn't think they're as groovy as he does. This is just one of Freddy's partisan diatribes similar to how he lionizes and promotes Mexicans and Mexico.

    Anyone who examines the historical record and the history of the Jews in the diaspora with an open mind will become anti-semitic.

    Breyer, Bader-Ginzberg and Kagen: whi is r the fourty Jew on Scotus?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  241. Vojkan says:
    @Gapeseed
    Probable above-average intelligence, a long-term perspective, emphasis on education, and in-group preferences compound nicely over generations. Instead of complaining about it, it would be nice if more of my fellow Catholics emulated Jews where they can.

    Above-average intelligence? C’mon. I have spent 36 years in France, met and worked with people of all races and many religions, among them many Jews, none of whom struck me with genius. Blowing hot air, they knew all, copying other people’s work they knew too, being creative… well, if you consider plagiarism as creativity because you’ve never heard of the original work, maybe.
    Gosh, I had a university teacher who told me face to face that an exposé I did was too good written and that he didn’t know to write like that and that I definitely didn’t write it myself, though he had no proof of what he was saying, but he couldn’t give me the grade the exposé deserved, and I have examples like that a lot, not only from personal experience but also from other people’s experience. Now if I had sucked up to them, repeating ad nauseam how great they were, maybe I would have got better grades.
    There are probably people with above average intelligence among them but I have seen no evidence that there were more among them than among any other group of people. The only reasons I see for their overrepresentation is that they have better material base to start from, which wasn’t always acquired in the most honest manner, and their sense of solidarity with each other which I admit is a great quality. But I have never seen a single clue, let alone evidence, that they are the God’s “chosen”, on the contrary.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  242. @jilles dykstra
    " It is strange: Jews have been disliked everywhere and in all times "

    Wrong, not the sephardic jews from Spain and Portugal in 17th century Holland.
    They were a separate community, but that was all.

    Assimilated jews in GB and Vienna also were not disliked.
    It was the other way round, when Galician railways around 1890 made the jewish middlemen superfluous, and they went as beggars to Vienna, the assimilated jews there became antisemitic

    Klaus Hödl, ‘Als Bettler in die Leopoldstadt, Galizische Juden auf dem Weg nach Wien’, Wien, 1994

    After jews were driven from the Iberian peninsula they were also welcome in the Ottoman empire.
    The population there disliked the asjekenazi jews, but hardly the sephardic ones from the Iberian pensinsula.
    Cannot now remember how to reference this.

    The explanation, hotly contested by many jews, for me is that asjkenazi jews are not semites, but descendants od the Asiatic Khazars.
    Shlomo Sand, ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’, London, New York, 2009, 2010 (Tel Aviv, 2008, hebrew)

    Even recently Israeli askenazi jews discriminated the sephardic ones
    Ralph Giordano, 'Israel um Himmels willen Israel', 1993 Köln
    Giordano, a German with an Italian father and a jewish mother, travelled extensively in Israel.
    Israel is run by asjkenazi jews, many sephardic jews leave Israel disillusioned, most for the USA.
    Google Giladi for one experience.

    About jewish future, it would not suprise me if what Henry Ford said again becomes true 'in the end most jewish projects fail through overconfidence'.
    Who will win, Deep State or Trump, remains to be seen, but whatever, the days of the USA empire are over.

    Forgot to write that jews were a eyesore to the catholic church, they made it clear that the might of the pope was not universal.

    jilles, does “Ashkenazi,” refers to all European Jews — Jews from Poland, Russia, Hungary etc. as well as from Germany – Austria?

    If yes, specifically, that Ashkenazi includes German Jews, then are you able to say what is the level of dominance of German Jews in Israel?

    It is my impression that most of the Jews who are in charge in Israel today are from Poland, Lithuania, Russia, etc, but NOT German Jews, but that’s just an impression.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  243. headrick says:

    I will try to explain this.
    1 )If you have a pressure cooker of water, and the relief valve on the top is working, there is hissing but no blow up. If you plug that up, it turns quiet for while, and then becomes a bomb.
    2) The control the Jews have over allowed public limits of criticism, of Israel in particular,
    will produce this same kind of dangerous hiatus in hiss level noise, but watch out.
    Recently my wife and I went to Ft. Meyers Florida to visit a museum there on Henry Ford, and I mentioned in the car, that Ford wrote “The international Jew” so thats what he was. That was all I said, but in reply came the rush of “there you go again about the Jews”. Holy
    cow you can’t say the word Jew in a sentence without the world holocaust in the same sentence somewhere without being socially beaten down. So I shut up, but make a mental note about the nature of what is going on. The relief valve is plugged, so don’t expect
    a surprise.
    3) Fealty toward Israel drives US foreign policy. Hostility toward Iran, Russia, and Assad in Syria is a required mantra on the right and left, and in many evangelical church services.
    If Pat Buchanan conservatives are quiet, it is not because the temperature under the pot is going down. It’s that the relief valve is stuck.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  244. johnnyg says:
    @KenH

    This explains why Jews do not like Christianity,
     
    That was in 1099. I could give a F who did what to whom that long ago. But with Jews their motto is "never forgive, never forget". Even when they've lived better in white Christian nations than in any other they still work to undermine the white Christians they live among. That their historical grudges have an endless shelf life is reason to hate them and bar them from living in our nations.

    Importantly, Jewish presence is seen as Jewish conspiracy. Four Jews on the Supreme Court?
     
    Right. When Jews are overrepresented in any field it's because they're so darn smart. It whites are overrepresented in their own friggin countries then Jews lecture us about unearned white privilege. This is why I and a growing number of whites hate them. And it just so happens that all four Jews represent the totalitarian left wing of the court who consistently vote against white American interests. Another reason they're hated.

    I won't waste too much time since Fred's writing philo-semitic propaganda and taking pot shots at anyone who doesn't think they're as groovy as he does. This is just one of Freddy's partisan diatribes similar to how he lionizes and promotes Mexicans and Mexico.

    Anyone who examines the historical record and the history of the Jews in the diaspora with an open mind will become anti-semitic.

    “I could give a F who did what to whom that long ago”

    I assume you mean “I couldn’t give a F………” (Nitpicking, I know)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  245. @Wally
    There was no 3.5M 0r 6M. No 'holocaust-lite'.
    The "Holocau$t Industry" in court:
    'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'

    There is no proof, only easily debunked Zionist propagand
    Show it if you have it.

    - If there was ‘a plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ as alleged, then why are there countless numbers of so called “survivor$"?

    - If the alleged ‘holocaust’ was fact, then why are there laws in Europe to prevent scrutiny of it? What kind of “truth” needs to imprison people to prevent free speech?

    - If Jews are so sure that millions of Jews were murdered, then why do they ask such dumb questions like "what happened to them then?
    fact:
    Not a single British Bletchley Park intercept of secret German messages to and from Auschwitz and the so called 'death camps' never mention gas chambers, killing Jews, or anything holocaust-like. There are many which do mention transporting Jews out of these labor camps.
    Also note that the outbound train records which were kept have disappeared while the inbound records have not. Who benefits?
    http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/ww2decrypts.html
    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7581

    Pilecki nonsense demolished here:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=pilecki
    Schulter debunked here:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=+Eduard+Schulte

    What skeptics like myself would like to see is captured German documents detailing large volumes of fuel being delivered to death camps” with which to fire ovens used in disposing of hundreds and thousands of gassed victims on an hourly and daily basis. Since it’s an established fact it takes a minimum of 90 minutes and thousands of BTU’s (British Thermal Units) to dispose of a single human body, coupled with the fact that Germany suffered from critical shortages of fossil fuels throughout the entire war, how the miracle of the holocaust actually occurred. How about it Wiz? Did the doc, to which you refer address these and other such discrepancies?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Obviously the full investigation designed to achieve absolute certainty required calculations of heat requirements and available fuel which could be and was provided. But I have dealt with most of those figures previously in relation to Treblinka if memory serves and showed that the figures produced by so called sceptics were bullshit. And, as an investor in Polish coal mines I am not impressed by the idea that Hitler's and Himmler's fanatical mismanagement of economic priorities did not extend to finding enough coal to help burn human bodies. So I am going to use my limited patience and time to help you think about a much, much more significant test question. How do you explain the transporting of millions of Jews from their homes throughout Europe who weren't"t suitable for forced Labor? They didn'’t transport women,children and old people when they took working age Frenchmen for the obvious reason that feeding and housing them would be wasteful. Only the Jews and maybe gypsies. So what do you think they did with the useless Jews?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  246. @jilles dykstra
    " It is strange: Jews have been disliked everywhere and in all times "

    Wrong, not the sephardic jews from Spain and Portugal in 17th century Holland.
    They were a separate community, but that was all.

    Assimilated jews in GB and Vienna also were not disliked.
    It was the other way round, when Galician railways around 1890 made the jewish middlemen superfluous, and they went as beggars to Vienna, the assimilated jews there became antisemitic

    Klaus Hödl, ‘Als Bettler in die Leopoldstadt, Galizische Juden auf dem Weg nach Wien’, Wien, 1994

    After jews were driven from the Iberian peninsula they were also welcome in the Ottoman empire.
    The population there disliked the asjekenazi jews, but hardly the sephardic ones from the Iberian pensinsula.
    Cannot now remember how to reference this.

    The explanation, hotly contested by many jews, for me is that asjkenazi jews are not semites, but descendants od the Asiatic Khazars.
    Shlomo Sand, ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’, London, New York, 2009, 2010 (Tel Aviv, 2008, hebrew)

    Even recently Israeli askenazi jews discriminated the sephardic ones
    Ralph Giordano, 'Israel um Himmels willen Israel', 1993 Köln
    Giordano, a German with an Italian father and a jewish mother, travelled extensively in Israel.
    Israel is run by asjkenazi jews, many sephardic jews leave Israel disillusioned, most for the USA.
    Google Giladi for one experience.

    About jewish future, it would not suprise me if what Henry Ford said again becomes true 'in the end most jewish projects fail through overconfidence'.
    Who will win, Deep State or Trump, remains to be seen, but whatever, the days of the USA empire are over.

    Forgot to write that jews were a eyesore to the catholic church, they made it clear that the might of the pope was not universal.

    Assimilated jews in GB and Vienna also were not disliked.
    It was the other way round, when Galician railways around 1890 made the jewish middlemen superfluous, and they went as beggars to Vienna, the assimilated jews there became antisemitic

    Fascinating.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  247. @Rex Little

    By the stretch of anyone’s imagination, when was the last time the US engaged in anything anywhere close to a just war?
     
    I'd say the attack on Afghanistan was justified if in fact the Taliban was giving shelter to Al-Qaeda as was alleged. But once they were taken out, we should have left them with a warning that we'd be back if anything like that happened again.

    Before that, the only just wars the US fought since the country was formed were WW2 (Japan attacked, Germany declared war against us) and the War of 1812 (Britain invaded).

    With mountains of evidence to disprove it, surely you cannot be serious in proposing that the US government ever thought Bin Laden had anything to do with 9/11.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  248. @MEFOBILLS
    Germans had legitimate grievances against the Jews.

    The Balfour document was called "stabbing in the back" by Germans. Germany had welcomed Jews into her economy more than any country up to that time.

    Germany had actually Won WW1, and Jews had maneuvered America to enter the war, so Zion could have Balfour.

    There was a preponderance of Jews at Versailles, and German's were humiliated by being made to stand, then there was additional debt humiliations and stripping of German lands and industry.

    Then interwar years of debt leads directly to hyperinflation. Then Germany discovers during the hyperinflation that much of Germany had been bought up. Jews borrowed dollars from the friends in money centers such as london and wall street, and bought up Germany on the cheap.

    As late as 38 up to 1/3 of Germany was still under Jewish economic control.

    In other words, Jews backstabbed Germany, then helped cause Versailled conditions, then bought up the country during hyperinflation they helped start.

    Then to make it worse, Zion declared war on Germany in 33, which was an attempt to starve Germany out. Germany was not food independent in those years.

    Basically Jewish behavior was disgusting, murderous, and "grabbing." You know if it is good for the tribe, then anything goes.

    Anti-semitism is a learned response. Anybody that sufficiently understands economics and economic history comes away with the understanding that throughout history, Jews have used usury to get over on others.

    Even the original Magna Carta was about Jews putting house to house in debt claims.

    Burning of Jewish homes was a Jubilee, because that is where the debts were stored.

    Nowadays, there is no way to Jubilee and get away from their usury magick game. If Jews don't straighten up and fly right, then the world will vomit them out again, as individual countries have done some 160 times in the past.

    Then interwar years of debt leads directly to hyperinflation. Then Germany discovers during the hyperinflation that much of Germany had been bought up. Jews borrowed dollars from the friends in money centers such as london and wall street, and bought up Germany on the cheap.

    As late as 38 up to 1/3 of Germany was still under Jewish economic control.

    In other words, Jews backstabbed Germany, then helped cause Versailled conditions, then bought up the country during hyperinflation they helped start.

    Then to make it worse, Zion declared war on Germany in 33, which was an attempt to starve Germany out. Germany was not food independent in those years.

    Geez, what kind of nonsense…. Read something of substance.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MEFOBILLS
    During the interwar years, there was a triangular flow of money.

    France and England had to pay the U.S. Treasury dollars. France and England then turned around and expected those same dollars from Germany - in reparations.

    Germany was prevented from exporting goods to acquire dollars. So, Germany ended up taking out municple loans from wall street.

    This then created a triangular flow from Wall Street Private Banks, to Germany, to their central bank, and from there to England/France and from there to U.S. Treasury.

    As this debt rose, it put exchange rate pressure on the mark.

    Bear raiders from U.S. finance, as well as London soon sniffed this out, and shorted the mark. This then leads directly to the hyperinflation. The act of shorting is an unwanted positive feedback .

    All hyperinflations in the modern era are due to exchange rate pressures. The Reichsbank had been privatized under Dawe's plan, and our ((friends)) were plying their game. Under Dawes control, private banks in Germany were allowed to give out loans for the "shorting" action to go forth. Who owned these private banks, and who benefited?

    So, yes... German people were abused in the interwar years. Even Galacian Jews became large owners of German property as they borrowed to buy the country out from under the Germans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  249. @turtle

    When a state is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural inertia of such a population will hold the Stage together and maintain its existence through astonishingly long periods of misgovernment and maladministration.
    But the situation is utterly different in a country where the population is not homogeneous....Should the ruling hand show signs of weakness in such a State the result will ... be to ... awaken the individualistic instincts which are slumbering in the ethnological groups.
     

    Where does this quote originate?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  250. @snag
    More expulsions, more pogroms and no place to run, it's not a matter of if but when?

    That’s one of the primary reasons Israel was created – to serve as last-ditch sanctuary to which Jews can flee when the SHTF.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  251. @utu
    And what evidence would satisfy you? They did not have CCTV in crematoria or gas chambers or where the shootings were done, I am afraid. I they had and you could see it on YT you and Wally would scream: crisis actors, crisis actors, nobody dies like that, it's fake bad acting.

    You should be honest and state that there is no evidence that you would be satisfied with. I am sure you are very skeptical about everything you have been told in school. I mean everything. Do you believe that Columbus made it to Hispaniola? Maybe it was a hoax he perpetrated on Spanish Crown to swindle it out of some cash?

    the biggest red flag for me personally is the fact all research into the matter is forbidden and asking questions because of the lack of research is criminal in some countries.

    anti-s has been used for the last 60 years to silence any and all criticism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu

    the biggest red flag [...] research is criminal in some countries
     
    This is good enough reason to support revisionism. But not good enough to believe revisionist claims.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  252. @gsjackson
    "Jews have never been associated with burglary or pick pocketing?" Probably would come as a surprise to Charles Dickens -- see Oliver Twist: Fagin.

    Yes, I thought of that immediately. Fagin, though, didn’t pick pockets himself. He taught orphan children to pick pockets and give him the goods they stole in return for giving them a home and feeding them. That is the practice that Dickens pointed out as being abhorrent, controlling people and influencing them to commit crimes for his benefit.

    That was the practice that Jewish pawnbrokers were always suspected of, and it was usually a correct suspicion. Paying thieves a pittance for stolen goods, under the guise of making them a loan which they never intended to repay and then taking the stolen goods as forfeited collateral was part of the pawnbrokers’ practice. The other part was usury.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  253. Harbinger says:
    @utu

    They either perish, as they rightly should or will turn this world into one big Gaza strip
     
    I have no doubt that there are some Jews who are very cognizant of the fact that the full spectrum domination of society is the only way for Jews to remain Jews in this world. It is either conquer or perish. The perishing for them is ceasing to be Jewish. They rather risk a biological annihilation while trying to conquer the world. After WWII and Holocaust they will not take any chances. For them it is us or them question.

    Utu

    “After WWII and Holocaust they will not take any chances.”

    The figures of Jewish dead in WW2 is grossly exaggerated and the lies have been promoted in order to allow Israel to grow, resting on the propaganda view that Jews need their own homeland in order to live and not be persecuted.
    Hitler would not have had his dislike of Jews had it not been for the fact that after coming home from the trenches in WW2, he saw communists, all Jewish causing chaos in his country. And as many people have correctly stated – communism IS Judaism IS Zionism. This is their father, son and the holy ghost.

    It is either us or them and people do not realize this one bit. It’s a real problem. They still haven’t bothered to work out just who is behind the mass immigration into the west. They are not interested when Jews speak of white genocide but froth at the mouth when anyone speaks out against Jews. It’s laugable to say the least.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  254. @Wizard of Oz
    I have an adult life time of getting to recognise cranks, obsessives and the paranoid with or without a few above average IQ points and I am not interested in taking up debate with obsessive cranks on something which is not of great interest to me. I am however, willing to read anything carefully analytical by you, a regular UR commenter, which shows that you can, if you can, which I doubt, absorb what the doco film discloses and my points about it, and deal with them in detail.

    I don't even know whether you accept the facts about the Enigma intercept, the imprisonment in Auschwicz of Witold Pilecki (had you heard of him?), his communications to London, Eduard Schulte, and his anti Nazi activity? If these are new to you since you formed your Holocaust hoax views I wonder about the mental processes by which you accommodate them.

    But what hope should I hold when you don't even acknowledge my careful point about the 3.5 - 4 million versus the 6 million?

    WITOLD’S REPORT
    …Basing on estimations done by those who worked close to that
    commando, over 2 million such people died.
    …Colleagues, who were there and witnessed gassings of eight thousand people a day, quote the number of plus/minus five million people.

    Vs.

    United States Holocaust Mememorial Museum
    …It is estimated that the SS and police deported at least 1.3 million people to the Auschwitz complex between 1940 and 1945. Of these, the camp authorities murdered approximately 1.1 million.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    For which there is proof of neither.

    http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DT/gcturen.html
    U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays standard German air-raid shelter door, describing it as the door to a gas chamber at Majdanek

    tax exempt cash taken in by USHMM, aka: ‘Holocau$t’ Theme Park, for fiscal year 2016:
    $151,826,695.00
    $151,826,695.00
    https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/042717-IRS-Form-990-FY16.pdf

    US taxpayers money to the USHMM in the 2017 budget:
    56,999,500.00
    https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/20160209-fy17-pres-budget-request.pdf

    www.codoh.com
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Unless you are saying that the Pole is such a liar that nothing he communicated to the Allies should be given any credit you are not dealing with the point of my comments. I would say that Witold Pilecki, who wanted presumably to stir the Allies into action, was inclined to report the highest figures that weren't patently fraudulent. Not relevan to any issue I raised.
    , @SolontoCroesus

    United States Holocaust Mememorial Museum
    …It is estimated that the SS and police deported at least 1.3 million people to the Auschwitz complex between 1940 and 1945. Of these, the camp authorities murdered approximately 1.1 million.
     
    In a document dated June 11, 1944, members of the Jewish Agency in Palestine, headed by David Ben Gurion, wrote that "they believed Auschwitz was a work camp."
    The members of the group had gathered to discuss whether they should request the Allies to bomb Auschwitz.
    The group declined to do so because it "did not wish to be responsible for the death of a single Jew."

    Thus, if the USHMM report is true, Germans "murdered 1.1 million Jews" between June 11, 1944 and January 27, 1945, or 4,782 JEWISH people per day, each and every day, (at the same time that the Allies were dropping tons of bombs and creating city-wide firestorms on German cities, but pay no attention to the man behind that curtain).

    There were Jews all over Europe/Germany/Eastern Europe, spying on Germany and German army, carrying out subversion and sabotage -- see, i.e. The Ritchie Boys (DVD), and Sons and Soldiers, both of which discuss the activities of nearly 2,000 German Jews who were trained as intelligence agents and interrogators by US military at Fort Ritchie, MD, beginning as early as 1936. These same German Jews acquired a large portion of the tons of German documents that are now the "German Archive" in US National Archive, and went on to serve as primary interrogators and prosecutors at Nuremberg.

    In the DVD, one Ritchie Boy reports of his visits to Nordhausen, where he was tasked to ensure that equipment promised to the Soviets was secured.
    In other words, German Jews in the employ of the Allies had access to and awareness of activities in German concentration camps.

    Western Allies bombed and strafed Nordhausen, photographed the destruction, blamed it on Germans, and used the photos at Nuremberg against Germans.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vs1eR7hsT8

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  255. Hitler’s complaints against the Jews were along usual lines, that Jews controlled German culture, finance, academia, and the media.

    No, you idiot. It wasn’t that the Jews merely “controlled” these things. It was that the Jews had turned Wiemar Germany into a sex-infested, economically dysfunctional hellhole where decent Germans could no longer afford to live with dignity and were suffocating underneath an unbearable burden of corruption and filth. Does that remind you of anyplace today, Fred?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  256. @Anonymous
    More of the past? Nope. It is just a question of how many goyim will be nuked.

    It’s all very simple. Fundamentally, Jews have been disliked because, as part of their Jewish identity, those with power pursue, often successfully, their perceived interests which often conflict with the perceived interests of another group(s).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  257. Rurik says:

    the last one could just as easily be Libya or Syria or Gaza or even Donbas

    only the worst, lying POS could possibly imply that the only reason these people might resent what has been done to them is because Larry Silverstein is smarter or has more money than they do.

    It amazes me how venal and rotten some people are, willing to lick the devil’s own butthole if it means a few more shekels to spend.

    and no, for all of this we really shouldn’t be hardest on the Zionist Jews like Silverstein and Bibi and the rest, because there are those who’re far, far worse than these murderers.

    there are not words to describe the goyim shills, who like Jewish Kapos in the camps, were all too willing to assist the Nazis in any way they could, by beatings and as snitches, so that that Nazis would give them perks and benefits.

    Sort of like John McCain and how he was coddled by the Viet Cong, and given perks for turning sides.

    That’s sort of like how our Fred has become!

    Willing to side with America’s greatest enemy, for a few perks and extra Federal Reserve Notes to spend!

    Mazel tov Fred!

    you’ve earned your bag of thirty shekels

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Rurik, you may be a racist Islamophobic dbag (no offence :) ), but desperate Muslims everywhere will take your kind, lesser evil and all, over the likes of every other soulless scum who currently rule over you, directly and indirectly.

    RURIK, FOR PRESIDENT... of the most evil empire on earth!!

    , @jacques sheete
    I already used my "AGREE" button.

    I agree with all.
    , @ThreeCranes
    Each of those pictures was easily worth more than a thousand of Fred's words. Way to go Rurik.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  258. As far as Europe is concerned, and US anti-EU propaganda notwithstanding, Europe doesn’t “do” multi-culti. Europe is a series of adjoining and interrelated territorial monocultures: you “are” where you “come from” and problem for the Jews is that they are a foreign “are” in somebody else’s “come from”. Prior to the French Revolution, the Jews were non-Christians in what was viewed as Christian territory. They could, of course, convert and many did, but those who wished to keep their Jewish identity found themselves, in practice, regarded as foreigners in the land of their birth. The development of now the prevailing concept of ethnic nationalism since 1789 has actually made matters worse. In simple terms, European ethnic nationalism postulates that each piece of the land of Europe belongs to one, and only one, ethnic group. In that territory, that ethnic group is entitled to establish a sovereign nation-state. “Nation-state” thus has a totally different meaning from its American meaning”: the US, for example, isn’t a “nation-state” in the European sense, nor are the UK, Spain, Russia and several other multi-ethnic European states. There is no part of the land of Europe that the Jews can claim as theirs, so, once again, those who were unwilling to integrate into the wider national community (and many did integrate) found themselves foreigners in the land of their birth. Hatred of the “other” is inherent in European ethnic nationalism, so Jews came to be perceived as unwelcome “others” more or less everywhere. The logic of that, as the author rightly says, is that Presbyterian owners of a store engaged in gouging will be resented as individuals but Jewish owners of a store engaged in gouging will be resented as Jews. That’s just human nature. Man is a tribal animal. That explains Herzl’s logic: since the Jews can’t claim any land in Europe and are thus resented as eternal foreigners, they should go to where they can lay claim to land, namely, the historic land of Israel.
    By the way, there’s no particular link between Germany and hatred of the Jews. Quite the contrary, indeed. Prior to 1933, the European Jews saw Germany as their protector and Russia as their persecutor. Equally, the belief that the Jews were in some way responsible for the outbreak or duration of WWI is was very widespread in interwar Europe. Things got out of hand in Germany because Germany had lost the war and was looking for a scapegoat. The “foreigner in their midst” was a perfect scapegoat.
    How any of that relates to the world outside Europe I leave to others.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Not entirely true. Jews were NOT "scapegoated", but were seen as the enemy, after a booklet "Germany Must Perish" and other anti-German tomes were published. Most of the "troubles" in Germany were a result of jewish communist infiltration of Germany between the two wars.
    It is interesting to note, that the yellow "star of david" patch that jews were required to wear were at the insistence of zionist leaders who were dealing with the German government. It is zionist leaders who pushed the idea of armbands and patches.
    You see, zionists had to make life uncomfortable for German jews in order to "encourage" them to emigrate to Palestine. Hence, "deals" were made with the German government to make life uncomfortable for German jews.
    , @Carroll Price
    Far from being mere scapegoats, during the later part of WW 1 Jews were guilty of organizing labor unions that crippled Germany's war efforts resulting from work stoppages that shut-down many of Germany's most critical armament industries. Leading to large numbers of hard-pressed German troops fighting on the front lines having to be pulled back to suppress work stoppages and severe social unrest, including food riots, with all being the result of Jewish agitators.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  259. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally
    Pilecki demolished here:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=pilecki

    Schulte debunked here:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=+Eduard+Schulte

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

    Do you even bother to read the links you post? Of seven or so links provided at CODOH above, only two discuss the people involved to any extent.