The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Fred Reed ArchiveBlogview
The Authoritarian Impulse
Getting What We Really Don’t Want
shutterstock_614382644
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

As a society crumbles, as bitter divisions grow and disorder spreads and nothing seems to work, anger comes and people begin to want a man who will say “Enough!” and slap down the malefactors–by any means necessary. A man who will make the trains run on time. A man who will make it safe to walk in the parks.

This is the authoritarian impulse. As corruption grows, as a coagulated government fails to function, the temptation comes. It is coming.

Recently I read that in Brazil some thirty men gang-raped a young woman, left her emotionally devastated, bleeding, with a ruptured bladder, and laughed as they did it before posting the video online. My first thought was, that they should be rounded up, shot without ceremony, and dropped into a public sewer. I meant this without a trace of hyperbole.

Two questions:

First, what proportion of the general public would agree with me in private? Second, what proportion would say so publicly? That is, say to hell with legal procedure, clotted bureaucracy, years of appeals, plea bargains, the insanity defense, and how they were troubled youth.

The ratio of the first to the second I will call Fred’s Fraction in a lunge for sociological immortality. It is an indicator of a country’s explosive potential, of how much anger exists and how tightly the lid is held on. When a great many are very sick of misbehavior, and government prevents both discussion and remedy, people begin to want someone in power who will forcibly end the detested behavior.

As we read day after day after day of beheadings of priests in Europe, of trucks driven into crowds, restaurants blown up, staffs of newspapers killed, always to the cry of “Allahu Akbar,” how many people begin to think–Send the army to round them up, put them on a ship, and beach it on the African coast? How many dare say it publicly?

Authoritarian solutions are ugly, but appeal when there are no others, when governments allow no others. They work, quickly. Hence their eternal appeal in times of chaos. Often they lead to a society that no one would want to live in. In the short run, they are effective and satisfying. We live in the short run.

It used to be, and may still be, that the immigration card on landing in Singapore said in red letters–this from memory–”There is a death penalty in Singapore for possession in drugs. This penalty is enforced.” How much of a problem do you suppose Singapore has with drugs? As society falls apart, people will begin to think–have begun to think–that the approach would work for rapists, muggers, racial attackers, and armed robbers.

It doesn’t matter whether you, or I, think this a good idea. People behave according to what they think, not to what I might think they ought to think.

The authoritarian impulse arises when legitimate government can’t or won’t maintain order. Which is beginning to look like now. In America we have attacks by Muslim terrorists while, until recently, the government did everything it can to import more Muslims. Blacks engage in open insurgency of low but increasing intensity. Under Obama, a black federal government supported them. Much of the country is sick of open borders, but the government has supported it. As government imposes more and more restrictions on what people can think or do, on how they must live, government becomes just another enemy.

Explosiveness is low in a civil society with little crime, in which people can leave doors unlocked and do not daily see stories of outrage and violation of civilized norms. They have nothing to explode about. They will believe in due process when a crime is committed and not favor extreme measures.

Such was white America in 1955. Whatever the defects of that time, the suburbs and small towns were calm and safe. I know. I was there. People were not afraid or chronically angry.

Today in America everyone is angry, and perhaps the most angry are those who believe in what in all times and places has been regarded as civilization. The old phrase “Silent Majority” applies, or approximates. This majority watches as mobs routinely storm podia and prevent politicians from speaking. They watch as rioters burn cities and loot malls, as college children out of control hold universities hostage.

Yet they cannot say so. They cannot say that looters and arsonist should be shot, that they weary of tolerating useless affirmative-action hires, or that misbehaving brats in college should be told to sit and and shut up or be expelled. Fred’s Fraction would indicate repressed anger.

An exercise for the reader: Calculate Fred’s Fraction for this recommendation: Those on Wall Street responsible for the subprime disaster should be summarily arrested and have their delicate asses immediately put, without recourse, into the general population of Leavenworth for ten years.

That sounds radical and seditious, doesn’t it? It is both. But how many are thinking it?

The anger is dangerous because it is not visible. The rigorous censorship we call “political correctness” prevents expression of ideas disliked by the ruling classes. It leads to surprises. It is why the Talking Heads were consistently, universally, and utterly wrong about Donald Trump’s chances of being elected. They continue to suffer from this cerebrocolonic congruence.

ORDER IT NOW

The Authoritarian Impulse flourishes in times of Weimarian social chaos, in which America has dipped a great deal more than a tentative toe. Groups hate each other. Whites, blacks, browns, the traditionally moral, libertines, New Yorkers, Jews, Southerners. Much as Yugoslavia needed a Tito to keep the peace by force, so may the US. In 1955 the country was almost entirely white, Christian, Anglophone, and European, which provided enough commonality to permit unity-and communications and transportation were poor enough to prevent friction between regions that would have detested each other: Massachusetts and West Virginia, New York and Alabama. The intercourse physical and philosophical made inevitable by the internet and easy transportation makes impossible the old live-and-let-live.

A happy ending is hard to imagine. Racial antagonism seems unlikely to subside, and worsens. Unemployment grows and will grow as automation advances. This is not fantasy, nor is it far in the future. The culture coarsens, imitating the ghetto. Gun sales are way up, and there is a reason.

It could blow. Such a thing would not be pretty and the consequences would be unpleasant. When people feel threatened, scared, or pushed beyond forbearance, their behavior becomes visceral, violent, and unthinking. If conditions grow uglier, as it appears they must, it will be chaos or a man on a horse. The Authoritarian Impulse.

(Reprinted from Fred on Everything by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Civil Liberties, Political Correctness 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. What you’re describing sounds more like a lynching impulse, than the authoritarian one. You need to calm down a bit.

    Read More
    • Troll: CK
    • Replies: @The Real John Jeremiah Smith

    What you’re describing sounds more like a lynching impulse, than the authoritarian one. You need to calm down a bit.
     
    I've read a few of your comments. You're an idiot. Why do you read any of Reed at all? You are stupid like a bag of broccoli.

    A "lynching" is carried out by a group of angry citizens. "Authoritarian" actions are taken by government. Perhaps idiots are confused about the difference.

    Got that? Now, stop it. Just stop it.
    , @pyrrhus
    It's a cycle. Low violence societies move toward permissiveness, which encourages violence in heterogeneous societies, which causes movement toward authoritarianism.
    As to the gang of rapists, I favor drawing and quartering, "pour encourager les autres."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/freed/the-authoritarian-impulse/#comment-1827723
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. A couple of thoughts:

    Absolutely right about Singapore. Take a look at statistics on crime there….their system works beautifully, in a tiny landmass with five and a half million people of Chinese, Indonesian, Malaysian and Indian origins and the respective religions of each, including Islam.

    Something better is needed in response to the current situation than what you’re describing. If the justice and police systems were reformed, prisons punished instead of just housed, capital punishment was brought back and used effectively, things would straighten out quickly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas

    Absolutely right about Singapore. Take a look at statistics on crime there….their system works beautifully, in a tiny landmass with five and a half million people of Chinese, Indonesian, Malaysian and Indian origins and the respective religions of each, including Islam.
     
    Singapore "works" insofar as people are terrified to commit crimes (or be falsely accused of same), including trafficking or possessing illicit drugs (or spitting on the sidewalk). It doesn't "work" and isn't "beautiful" by traditional civilized Western standards, where people desire to be more at ease and behave according to societal standards first out of notions of shared moral and cultural values, a developed conscience, empathy, concern for good reputation, care for the functioning of society, etc., and only after these are breached should the State or Crown intervene - and then the accused is afforded meaningful process (presumption of innocence, the right to develop evidence and confront witnesses, etc.).

    The "beautifully working" government that can hang you in the course of a few weeks for possession of contraband has an awfully tempting tool at its disposal.

    , @Clay
    The justice and police systems can't be reformed.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    It mostly works by being very small. By having draconian policies, it first seeks to discourage potential troublemakers from coming in the first place, and by making exit, if desired, really is. So while I like how well its run, there's no doubt that it largely exists by offloading a lot of hard problems to its neighbors.
  3. When chaos comes it will be short lived, the mechanisms for suppression being in place and waiting. The man on the horse will be but a symbol, a talisman for the vast State beneath. Later, when the biowars begin they will be welcomed by some as were the Germanic barbarians after Rome had rotted from within.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II

    When chaos comes it will be short lived, the mechanisms for suppression being in place and waiting.
     
    this 100% describes democracy in the usa and the west. the entire system is designed to suppress or neutralize descent/opposition :)
  4. @Mao Cheng Ji
    What you're describing sounds more like a lynching impulse, than the authoritarian one. You need to calm down a bit.

    What you’re describing sounds more like a lynching impulse, than the authoritarian one. You need to calm down a bit.

    I’ve read a few of your comments. You’re an idiot. Why do you read any of Reed at all? You are stupid like a bag of broccoli.

    A “lynching” is carried out by a group of angry citizens. “Authoritarian” actions are taken by government. Perhaps idiots are confused about the difference.

    Got that? Now, stop it. Just stop it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    He said a "lynching impulse". From the opinion of yoursef your words imply you should be able to see that you have probably missed his point. The "lynching impulse" can surely be understood as supporting violent solutions to problems of crime without due process of law.
    , @woodNfish
    Actually Mao was correct, and you are not.
  5. A lot of Fred is saying is basically true. It doesn’t need to be lynchings, but people need to know they can get justice and that they can have safe streets and they will put up with a hell of a lot to get the basics, like not having to bribe somebody to be able to buy bananas for their kids. People sometimes wonder why the Taliban had control of almost all of Afghanistan before 9/11. They were harsh and most people in the West would hate to live under them, but after years of civil war and corruption, they were acceptable to the alternatives:
    “The 2010 Survey of the Afghan People conducted by the Asia Foundation revealed that only about half of survey respondents believe that state courts are effective at delivering justice and less than half of the population agree that state courts are not corrupt compared to other institutions. A recent article in the Joint Force Quarterly (JFQ) noted that in Kandahar City, 67% of the population believe that the government cannot provide justice due to corruption, and 53% believe that the Taliban are incorruptible. In the previously mentioned article by Suhrke and Borchgrevink, the authors note that the lack of an effective formal justice system was increasingly cited as the main reason villagers turned away from the government and chose to support the Taliban – who sharply cut down on crime during their rule – and in some parts of the South accepted Taliban justice.”

    http://www.operationspaix.net/DATA/DOCUMENT/6379~v~The_Informal_Justice_System_in_Afghanistan.pdf

    Perfect? No – but Fred’s obviously writing about reality.

    Peace.

    Read More
  6. That was one great post, Fred. I can’t think of anything I disagree with in there.

    I note you didn’t have room to go into the financial pain to come (or it didn’t fit in with the column), but when the dollar goes down the toilet via default or hyperinflation, that’s most likely when the trouble you are warning us about will happen. It might be sooner, but not later than that.

    Read More
  7. I think Fred sits in his barcalounger on Lake Chapala and dreams about an America on fire. Maybe it makes him feel better about his decision to decamp to Mexico. Problem is, he doesn’t understand this country anymore. For one thing, people may be angry about a lot of things, and one of those things is illegal immigration. But Fred has nothing to say about that, except that Mexicans are really really smart, probably smarter than we are — and we should embrace 10 million squat monsters. (Like I said, he doesn’t understand America)

    He also seems to think people are thisclose to picking up their AR-15s and storming the bastille. Not bloody likely. Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks. We have plenty to lose and will not overreact to absurd made for TV riots in Ferguson, Missouri. Let the coloreds kill each other, they have no souls anyway.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bluedog
    Lol what do you mean "most of us" with a 100 million unemployed millions more under employed, God only knows how many are living on the street or how many living in poverty, and a very large number of those employed are 30 days from the street if they loose their jobs or so I read, anyway with 20+trillion in debt and more coming, and trillions more in future liabilities and a very large bubble on wall street. Son I don't know what your on but the let down is going to be a rear bitch...
    , @Stonehands
    You make your point- but I think that you are unintentionally accepting defeat in the culture wars-because you have "stuff". There will be no revolutionary advances in society if you are unwilling to lose it all. Anyhow, fortune favors the bold- and the masses will shuffle along behind whoever is winning..
    , @fnn

    Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks.
     
    I don't think so. The median income is shockingly low:

    In 2014, half of working Americans reported an income at or below $28,851 (the median wage), and 51 percent reported an income of less than $30,000. Forty percent are making less than $20,000.
     
    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/25/1-in-2-working-americans-make-less-than-30000-a-year/#ixzz4dyvudkW1
    , @dfordoom

    He also seems to think people are thisclose to picking up their AR-15s and storming the bastille. Not bloody likely. Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks. We have plenty to lose
     
    You're quite correct on that point. The chances of the kind of explosion Fred seems to be expecting are close to zero. People in the modern West are not going to risk their material comforts. No matter how bad things get they will just put up with it.
  8. As Fred states here, the root of the problem is not the problems themselves, but the fact that we are not allowed to talk openly about the problems around us. We are forced to accept certain limitations on the range of what we can openly discuss about the causes of these issues. This prevents a political solution to our various problems, thus necessitating non-political solutions to such.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    Not only are we not allowed to discuss the conditions that we find ourselves in if we wish to retain a position in polite sociwty, but both parties are fully committed to globalism/multiculturalism. There is no traditional political venue in which to challenge globalism/multiculturalism.
  9. Ah the good ol’ days of Saddam. When justice was justice. As long as you didn’t talk about Saddam or politics all was well. Rapists were lined up against a wall and shot. Corrupt officials hung for their inability to complete projects in a timely fashion (god does the West need that). The crazy religious and minorities alike suppressed for the greater good.

    Iraq had to lose it all before realizing what it is it gave up.

    Read More
  10. Fred, excellent essay. I really want some of that hooch you are drinking.

    As a commenter said in response to an earlier post I made in the Unz Review, if you don’t want a Hitler to sort things out, don’t “Weimarize” your country. It’s a “This, therefore that …” kind of thing. The United States has been “Weimarized”. Western Europe is even in worse shape.

    Oh, I forget: “Islam is a religion of peace” … “Diversity is strength”“Race and gender are social constructs.”

    It’s going to be a wild ride.

    Read More
  11. @Bragadocious
    I think Fred sits in his barcalounger on Lake Chapala and dreams about an America on fire. Maybe it makes him feel better about his decision to decamp to Mexico. Problem is, he doesn't understand this country anymore. For one thing, people may be angry about a lot of things, and one of those things is illegal immigration. But Fred has nothing to say about that, except that Mexicans are really really smart, probably smarter than we are -- and we should embrace 10 million squat monsters. (Like I said, he doesn't understand America)

    He also seems to think people are thisclose to picking up their AR-15s and storming the bastille. Not bloody likely. Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks. We have plenty to lose and will not overreact to absurd made for TV riots in Ferguson, Missouri. Let the coloreds kill each other, they have no souls anyway.

    Lol what do you mean “most of us” with a 100 million unemployed millions more under employed, God only knows how many are living on the street or how many living in poverty, and a very large number of those employed are 30 days from the street if they loose their jobs or so I read, anyway with 20+trillion in debt and more coming, and trillions more in future liabilities and a very large bubble on wall street. Son I don’t know what your on but the let down is going to be a rear bitch…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bragadocious
    What I meant is most Americans have some combination of those things. We know around 2/3 of Americans live in an owner-occupied home. These are not people who will start a revolution over some monkeyshines in a Ferguson, MO convenience store. Fred's nuts, or he's just trolling. That was my point.
  12. “The culture coarsens, imitating the ghetto.”
    So very true, and by far the greatest threat in America’s future- the Syrians, Iraqis, North Koreans, ISIS, ( fill in the blank for the latest overseas bogeyman-of-the-week ) pale into a wisp beside the ongoing disintegration of American traditional family life.
    Self-discipline, self sacrifice and self restraint are the prices which must be paid for a civilization to survive, much less flourish, and Americans are increasingly unwilling to pay up.
    The America of a generation or two down the road will have the social cohesion of El Salvador.

    Read More
  13. @bluedog
    Lol what do you mean "most of us" with a 100 million unemployed millions more under employed, God only knows how many are living on the street or how many living in poverty, and a very large number of those employed are 30 days from the street if they loose their jobs or so I read, anyway with 20+trillion in debt and more coming, and trillions more in future liabilities and a very large bubble on wall street. Son I don't know what your on but the let down is going to be a rear bitch...

    What I meant is most Americans have some combination of those things. We know around 2/3 of Americans live in an owner-occupied home. These are not people who will start a revolution over some monkeyshines in a Ferguson, MO convenience store. Fred’s nuts, or he’s just trolling. That was my point.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
    I've always read upheaval's pump is well primed at something like 3% of the population as a hardcore, ZFG vanguard, 10% on-board, with maybe a few more sympathetic. Were hardcore communist Jews 2/3rd of Tzar Nicholas' subjects?

    I would think displaced declasse intellectual types would be the main concern as far as revolutionary potential goes. Despite whatever your bubble's capacity to refract current reality may be, they aren't in short supply.

    , @animalogic
    You're right - revolution is some way off. However...
    Is it an exaggeration to say that - beyond appearances - American governments actually CARE about the average citizen ? Seems to me Government (given its marching orders by the real rulers) has been slowly heating up their poor frog-like citizens for 40 odd years.
    It's not just systemic corruption, rampant injustice (civil forfeiture is the one that boggles my mind most) & austerity that threaten: it's the fact that elites no longer even seem to care whether their feudal attitude to the public is seen & heard. Naked class contempt...
    The average citizen will continue to wear it....until all the inherent filth bursts forth, like a bloated gangerous wound. And then it's too late... Now is the time for citizens to develop a coherent philosophy & organise independent of the state & ruling class.... To quote (believe it or not) Johnny Rotten: "Anger is an energy"
    , @Dr. X

    What I meant is most Americans have some combination of those things. We know around 2/3 of Americans live in an owner-occupied home. These are not people who will start a revolution over some monkeyshines in a Ferguson, MO convenience store. Fred’s nuts, or he’s just trolling. That was my point.
     
    You're missing Fred's point entirely. Of course the Americans who have two cars and a summer home and a boat aren't going to "start a revolution." They're the ones who will demand that an authoritarian figure will put an end to the revolution that the left-wing rabble and their Negro pawns will start.
  14. @Bragadocious
    What I meant is most Americans have some combination of those things. We know around 2/3 of Americans live in an owner-occupied home. These are not people who will start a revolution over some monkeyshines in a Ferguson, MO convenience store. Fred's nuts, or he's just trolling. That was my point.

    I’ve always read upheaval’s pump is well primed at something like 3% of the population as a hardcore, ZFG vanguard, 10% on-board, with maybe a few more sympathetic. Were hardcore communist Jews 2/3rd of Tzar Nicholas’ subjects?

    I would think displaced declasse intellectual types would be the main concern as far as revolutionary potential goes. Despite whatever your bubble’s capacity to refract current reality may be, they aren’t in short supply.

    Read More
  15. I think Fred is right, BUT I was under the impression that Trump was supposed to be the man on the white horse!! It seems, as John Derbyshire has pointed out in his most recent article, that Trump has and will continue to sell out and disappoint! As Derbyshire has eloquently remarked, it seems we have elected an emotional 14 year old girl (who lobbed cruze missiles on an impulse) without really realizing that this will not change the strategic and political situation in Syria! We have ended up with a George W Bush II administration without real significant policy changes on illegal immigration, free trade and the neoliberal corporatist-globalist agenda that has been implemented for the past twenty five years since the collapse of communism in 1991.

    No, I don’t see another strongman coming in America’s future, I see further polarization, fragmentation and eventual disintegration similar to the Roman, Ottoman and Soviet Empires. This process of disintegration will likely be violent and may even involve a civil war such as occurred in Rome’s waning years.

    Erol Pedersen MA Political Science MA International History

    Read More
  16. I had the experience of living for several years in a county that was about 98 percent white. Though white society is greatly degraded from what it was 40 years ago, it’s still fairly peaceful. Visiting relatives who lived in a city that was 40/60 white/black were astonished that we could safely go to Wal-Mart after dark. During Halloween, no gangs of black thugs came knocking at our doors under pretense of asking for candy. (Yes, this really happened to our relatives.) Seeing grown men walking around town with their pants pulled down to their knees was exceedingly rare in our virtually all-white community.

    Fred may be right that civilized society won’t put up with this forever. Reaching an end of tolerance and doing something about the problems is better than continuing to slide, slide, slide. Because I now live in a county that is only about 95 percent white, and one of the local restaurants is staffed largely by homosexual blacks. It matters not who you are or what your racial feelings are, whether liberal, conservative, or non-aligned, that’s not a restaurant where you want to bring your kids just for a pleasant meal. People who just want a meal will avoid it.

    No, seriously. Even way leftist liberals don’t want the family outing hijacked into a sermon explaining to the 7-year old why obviously immoral and aberrant behavior isn’t a reflection on all black people. Nor would they want to explain why — in the case of these all too many homosexuals — the outlandish and embarrassing “queering off” doesn’t speak ill of all homosexuals. Truth is, a 7-year old of reasonable intelligence and moral instincts is very likely to conclude that homosexuality is a big problem in the black community (it is) and that homosexuals deliberately behave in public like repulsive freaks just to get attention (many do), because they’re the sort of socially retarded people who cannot distinguish between good and bad attention (many are). To them, all attention is good attention.

    So the upshot of it is, the restaurant will eventually close down after word gets around that it’s a lurking spot for a ring of black homosexuals. Even the most gay-friendly liberal doesn’t want his food served up by a guy who was fisting another man two hours ago.

    So, for now, the slide continues. If there never comes a point where decent people push back, the rot of civilization continues until there is nothing left worth saving.

    Read More
  17. A far as “Fred’s Fraction”goes, your good name makes you S.O.L. on this one, Mr. Reed. In the engineering world, especially in the fields of heat transfer and turbulent fluid flow, there are a bunch of dimensionless numbers used to parametrize multiple variables together to enable mathematical description of these processes. This is due to the fact that these are physical processes that can not be described in closed-form via equations from theory, only via empirical equations, meaning those that come from experimental data.

    That gives us, besides the Mach number, M, that we all know and love, the Prandtl number, the Nusselt number, the Biot number, the Grashof number, the Raleigh number (free convection), and here’s your problem, Fred Reed, the Reynolds number. “Re” is taken. Your namesake dimensionless number represents the ratio of inertial forces over viscous forces in fluid flow, not the ratio of people who privately call for action against egregious wrongs over those who are not afraid to publicly do so.

    The Reynolds number is the KEY parameter that’s used in determining whether any kind of flow is laminar or turbulent. Low is Laminar, and high is turbulent. I’ve got an idea, though, Fred – I don’t think it would be too big a deal for you to invert your Fred Fraction. It would be (People calling in public for action / People calling only in private for action). Since the numerator can’t be greater than the denominator – cause if you call for action in public, you’d have no problem also doing that in private – your ratio will nicely vary from 0 to 1.

    Let us rename your FF to the Reed number. Just like the other Re for inertial forces over viscous forces, a high Reed number, Re, would also mean turbulence. What do you think, Fred?

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Grate Deign
    All good reasons to go electric, dude. We can measure our stuff!
  18. When a political entity and its subjects behave so contrary to reality, the question isn’t If but rather When it’ll all come tumbling down. The Imperial USofA is just such an entity.

    I’m not much for apocalyptic views, but it will probably get pretty darned ugly. In many parts of the empire, literal insurgencies have gathered momentum from soft and quiet, to ever harder and louder. The corporacrats in DC, state houses, and in local governments won’t go gentle into that good night, either, and will desire to loot and pillage from their hosts (us) until the bitter end.

    While I doubt it’ll be a full on total war, I do believe we’re going to have bloodshed, as well as a breaking up of this empire similar to what happened to the old Soviet Union.

    Whee.

    Read More
  19. I love to see just desserts, and for tolerating the presence of blacks, Mexicans and progressive fascists, the US deserves to burn to the ground, well, at least the cities and complacent suburbs.

    Read More
  20. @Achmed E. Newman
    A far as "Fred’s Fraction"goes, your good name makes you S.O.L. on this one, Mr. Reed. In the engineering world, especially in the fields of heat transfer and turbulent fluid flow, there are a bunch of dimensionless numbers used to parametrize multiple variables together to enable mathematical description of these processes. This is due to the fact that these are physical processes that can not be described in closed-form via equations from theory, only via empirical equations, meaning those that come from experimental data.

    That gives us, besides the Mach number, M, that we all know and love, the Prandtl number, the Nusselt number, the Biot number, the Grashof number, the Raleigh number (free convection), and here's your problem, Fred Reed, the Reynolds number. "Re" is taken. Your namesake dimensionless number represents the ratio of inertial forces over viscous forces in fluid flow, not the ratio of people who privately call for action against egregious wrongs over those who are not afraid to publicly do so.

    The Reynolds number is the KEY parameter that's used in determining whether any kind of flow is laminar or turbulent. Low is Laminar, and high is turbulent. I've got an idea, though, Fred - I don't think it would be too big a deal for you to invert your Fred Fraction. It would be (People calling in public for action / People calling only in private for action). Since the numerator can't be greater than the denominator - cause if you call for action in public, you'd have no problem also doing that in private - your ratio will nicely vary from 0 to 1.

    Let us rename your FF to the Reed number. Just like the other Re for inertial forces over viscous forces, a high Reed number, Re, would also mean turbulence. What do you think, Fred?

    All good reasons to go electric, dude. We can measure our stuff!

    Read More
  21. Didn’t Neil Young nail this back in 1980 with this song off his “Hawks and Doves” album? OK he’s just a typical musician to which I wouldn’t listen to any claptrap on politics. However, albeit 3.5 decades early, the lyrics of this stopped-clock-being-right-once-or-twice-per-day song ring so true. Plus he had a fiddle and the backing vocals of the wonderful Nicolette Larson.

    Neil Young – “Coming Apart at Every Nail“:

    “Hey, hey, ain’t that right?
    The workingman’s in for a hell of a fight.
    Oh this country sure looks good to me,
    but these fences are coming apart at every nail.”

    Read More
  22. I’ve quoted some of Fred’s observations as snippets

    As a society crumbles, as bitter divisions grow and disorder spreads and nothing seems to work, anger comes and people begin to want a man who will say “Enough!” and slap down the malefactors–by any means necessary. A man who will make the trains run on time.

    government prevents both discussion and remedy, people begin to want someone in power who will forcibly end the detested behavior.

    The authoritarian impulse arises when legitimate government can’t or won’t maintain order. Which is beginning to look like now.

    As government imposes more and more restrictions on what people can think or do, on how they must live, government becomes just another enemy.

    This majority watches as mobs routinely storm podia and prevent politicians from speaking. They watch as rioters burn cities

    Yet they cannot say so. They cannot say that looters and arsonist should be shot

    Those on Wall Street responsible for the subprime disaster should be summarily arrested and have their delicate asses immediately put, without recourse, into the general population of Leavenworth for ten years.

    That sounds radical and seditious, doesn’t it? It is both. But how many are thinking it?

    The anger is dangerous because it is not visible. The rigorous censorship we call “political correctness” prevents expression of ideas disliked by the ruling classes. It leads to surprises. It is why the Talking Heads were consistently, universally, and utterly wrong about Donald Trump’s chances of being elected. They continue to suffer from this cerebrocolonic congruence.

    The Authoritarian Impulse flourishes in times of Weimarian social chaos, in which America has dipped a great deal more than a tentative toe. Groups hate each other.

    A happy ending is hard to imagine. Racial antagonism seems unlikely to subside, and worsens.

    The culture coarsens, imitating the ghetto. Gun sales are way up, and there is a reason.

    It could blow. Such a thing would not be pretty and the consequences would be unpleasant. When people feel threatened, scared, or pushed beyond forbearance, their behavior becomes visceral, violent, and unthinking. If conditions grow uglier, as it appears they must, it will be chaos or a man on a horse. The Authoritarian Impulse.

    I think it paints a rather gloomy picture

    it’s a redux of the exact same forces at war in Europe during WWII

    white Christian types (who want to live in nations run by and for white Christian types and their children) vs. Jews and blacks and Arabs and Asians and Muslims and Hispanics and everyone else, who *demand* that these white, Christian types hand over their nations and live as heavily taxed, humiliated and despised second class citizens at the pleasure of their new masters.

    That was the exact paradigm during the Weimar regime- that led to the ‘man on a horse’, and that is the *exact*, same paradigm facing white, Christian types today in virtually every single place where they live, whether it’s their ancient homelands in Europe and Scandinavia, or the magnificent civilizations they’ve built in the new world. They are all expected to give them up and hand them over, and any who object are met with iron-fisted hysteria for their breach of universally and forcibly applied political correctness.

    I suspect, (as Fred ruminates) this does not bode well for the future.

    It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late,
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy — willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the Saxon began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low.
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd.
    It was not taught by the state.
    No man spoke it aloud
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    It was not suddenly bred.
    It will not swiftly abate.
    Through the chilled years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the Saxon began to hate.

    ~ Kipling

    [just substitute 'Saxon' for Western man]

    Read More
  23. An exercise for the reader: Calculate Fred’s Fraction for this recommendation: Those on Wall Street responsible for the subprime disaster should be summarily arrested and have their delicate asses immediately put, without recourse, into the general population of Leavenworth for ten years.

    That sounds radical and seditious, doesn’t it? It is both. But how many are thinking it?

    First of all, did you mean ‘delicious’ instead of ‘seditious?’ The former sounds more appropriate. Your question about bankers reminds me of an old joke:

    Q: What do you call it when a bus full of lawyers goes over a cliff?
    A: Ashame.
    Q: What do you call it when two seats were empty?
    A: A damn shame!

    Read More
  24. “The authoritarian impulse arises when legitimate government can’t or won’t maintain order.”

    That’s not what is happening. The rising anger is about organicism. We are all organisms, and so we have organic drives and instincts. These instincts are for survival, defense, and self-preservation, but they can also be about aggression, invasion, and violence(as all organisms, and humans are animal-organisms too, violent by nature), which can cause much havoc.
    So, we created society and the state to take up the role of peace-maker and peace-enforcer.
    We leave it up to the state to maintain order by enacting and enforcing laws. That way, our organicist need for self-preservation and security is served by the apparatus of the state. That way, we can have state-sanctioned Rule of Law instead of the vigilante justice of humans-as-instinctual-animal-mobs or vendetta-justice of human-as-honor-bound-clan-members(like in Sicily). So, all states, even democratic ones, are by nature authoritarian. They have the power to enact and enforce laws, and we have to adhere to those laws.

    The problem of the current West is not lack of authority or authoritarianism. It is due to the problem of MISPLACED authority and authoritarianism. The problem is not that the state won’t do its part to enact and enforce laws. The problem is the state is enforcing and enacting the WRONG kinds of laws against the wrong kinds of people.
    A state exists to protect its people(ethnos), territory, culture, and heritage from threats posed by foreigners and would-be-invaders. And Western nations used to do this. So, what changed? The Jewish globalists took over as elites. Jews are a minority in Western nations, and they are paranoid. They think the majority population of white goyim might rise up and come after them. Now, such fears were once understandable because there was overt hostility and even naked aggression against Jews in the past. But things have changed profoundly since the end of WWII. Attitudes have changed, and white people no longer hate Jews, and most white folks don’t mind Jewish success. But Jews still have this deep-rooted fear and loathing of white majority power. So, Jews used their influence in the West to undermine all notions of white majority identity, interest, and power. And white cuck-collaborator elites(bought by Jewish money or mind-colonized by Jewish PC) go along with this arrangement.

    The result is PC, a form of authoritarianism that uses the power of law, media, and education to suppress anything associated with white identity, white pride, white territory, and white power. PC is authoritarian. It arrests people for saying the ‘wrong’ thing. In the UK, some guy was arrested for cracking a joke about Mandela on Twitter. In Germany, Merkel the hideous bitch has pushed laws that go after Germans who denounce Muslim ‘refugees’. Swedish state goes after people who denounce immigration as a form of invasion and displacement. PC Swedes are secular-lutheran-puritans of ‘social justice’ that says whites are virtuous if and only if they cuck out to Jews, homos, and non-whites.
    So, the problem is not lack of authoritarianism but misplaced authoritarianism that favors aliens, minorities, and invaders than native folks. Jews want it this way. Because Jews are a minority elite in these nations, they want the state to favor the ideal of minority ‘rights’ and minority power than the identities/interests of native majorities. So, natives should have no special identity, no special history, and no special sense of territory. Earnest and naive do-goody Swedes have drunk this Jewish globo-Kool-aid more than any other people, and they are now saying Swedes have no history and no land to call their own. So, Sweden is to be open to all peoples. This craziness is enforced with authoritarianism in Sweden. All Swedes must consent to it .. or else.

    In the US, the problem is not lack of authoritarianism when it comes to black crime. The problem is too much PC authoritarianism on the issue of race. Elite power is employed to hunt down and destroy anyone who dares to question or counter the PC narrative. Charles Murray’s views on race differences in IQ are mild stuff, but for them he was exiled from respectable community for a long time, and recently he was attacked by Middlebury PC Janissary.

    If there were no PC and if Americans could speak freely and honesty, we would have much better state of affairs since real problems would be addressed and worked on. It’s like honest diagnosis of illness is necessary in order to come up with the right cure. If honesty is made taboo in medical diagnosis, the disease cannot be treated. Imagine if doctors are not allowed to call a cancer a cancer but must blame it on anything but cancer.

    On the issue of crime and racial violence, we would have a much better diagnosis of what is ailing the West if we could speak honestly. If honesty and truth replaced PC, people would sa, “It’s blacks, not ‘teens’ and ‘youths’, who are going around bashing people. And blacks act like this because they are naturally stronger, more muscular, and more aggressive. So, they go around kicking non-white butt and cause all sorts of problems.” That is so simple and so true.
    Some try to blame black violence on slavery, but does anyone really believe the US would have the same racial problems if it had brought over Chinese than Africans as slaves? Even as angry descendants of Chinese slaves, the little yellow guys wouldn’t be scaring white folks half to death. It’s like native of Mexico suffered a lot under the Spanish for many centuries, but most people don’t fear Mexicans because most of them look like Guillermo.

    We need to speak the truth on race and racial problems. But PC authoritarianism ruthlessly destroys the reputation, career, and life of anyone who speaks honestly on the race issue. PC authoritarianism clamps down on truth, honesty, and candidness. It blunts Occam’s Razor. PC is the switchblade of BS.

    So, the current rising anger is not about the Authoritarian Impulse but the Counter-Authoritarian Impulse. Honest people are getting sick of PC authoritarianism that favors the globalist elites, Jewish supremacists, black thugs, Muslim hordes, US military machine(that does the INVADE that leads to INVITE, something both Republicans and Democrats endorse), the white cucks who shill out to the GLOB, the reconquista Pepe Gonzalezes, Chinese sharks and Hindu weasels, homosexuals and trannies, and ghastly Negroes.

    The Counter-Authoritarian Impulse is anti-PC. It is against the Enforcement of Lies. It is against the Power of Propaganda that crushes the Truth that honest people can see with their own eyes. It is against the enforced suppression of white identity, white pride, white power, and white territoriality.

    Sure, some may feel that violence is necessary to bring about a new order, but most people who oppose PC want real freedom(especially from Negroes and excessive Diversity), not authoritarianism.
    We already have an autocratic/authoritarian political-social order that doesn’t allow free speech. In the EU, free speech is illegal. In the US, free speech is effectively dead because anyone who dares to speak the truth will be destroyed politically or economically. Also, college professors have raised entire generations of thugs to attack and punch ‘nazis’. The MSM didn’t condemn the violence at Berkeley against Milo and at Middlebury against bald-headed Murray.

    The current PC authoritarianism is against the natural impulse of white racial organism. White human organisms want safety, security, and survival. At least those with healthy natural instincts do. Sadly, too many whites have had their minds colonized-and-infected by PC virus, and as such, they’ve been reprogrammed to identify with the Other than with the Self. It’s like ants of one colony can be reprogrammed to serve another colony. It’s like what the Turks did to Greek/Christian boys by turning them into Janissary.

    If there had been no PC authoritarianism, people would have spoken the truth and expressed their racial/national interests in the West. And then, the state would have been mindful of those truths & those sentiments and would have acted accordingly to enact and enforce the kinds of laws to maintain the security and survival of the native majority population.

    But the state was taken over by globalists who favored elite-minority-privilege-and-supremacism above all else. So, the state went from liberal-democratic-patriotic to authoritarian-PC-globalist. What is now called ‘liberal democracy’ is anything but. All of the West is ruled by globalist-oligarch-gang, and many of these people are Jewish who fear, loathe, and hate any notion of white gentile identity, pride, power, and territory. So, they push ‘diversity’ as a ‘liberal democratic’ value when, in fact, diversity makes democracy much less tenable since a diverse nation generally has people voting along racial/tribal lines.

    Worst of all, the globalists seek to totally shame and humiliate white men — the warriors of the white race — by turning white boys into pansy cucks who cheer on the colonization of white wombs by Negroes to hatch black babies. Womb Colonization is more destructive than Land Colonization. After all, even if a people’s land is colonized by another people, the people can survive as a race, culture, and identity. But when the women of a race have their wombs colonized by the men of the invasive race, then they hatch children for the enemy men. (Spanish Conquistadors colonized the wombs of native women in the Americas, and the resulting Mestizo population has served the Empire than resist it.) Today, globalists use mass media to spread jungle fever to turn white boys into cucks and white women into muds whose wombs hatch black babies, the main enemy of the white race and of civilization in general. The white race is getting bullwhipped by globalism.

    Not all rage is authoritarian. The American Revolutionary Impulse against Britain was not authoritarian. It was for want of freedom and independence.
    And we are seeing the same kind of spirit rising among awakened whites who, unlike asleep hibernating ones, realize what’s really at stake. They want liberation, independence, and freedom from PC tyranny. Some may hope for a strong leader to lead the way, but their ultimate goal is freedom and independence, not to live under a tyrant.

    Read More
    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    • Replies: @Anonimousetoo

    Attitudes have changed, and white people no longer hate Jews, and most white folks don’t mind Jewish success. But Jews still have this deep-rooted fear and loathing of white majority power. So, Jews used their influence in the West to undermine all notions of white majority identity, interest, and power. And white cuck-collaborator elites(bought by Jewish money or mind-colonized by Jewish PC) go along with this arrangement.
     
    Ever wonder why? Could it be that it all starts with Sesame Street at about age three. Tended carefully by a church that worships the crucified (((Christ))). Run by men in dresses. Hmmmmm?
    , @Rdm
    As much as I occasionally enjoy reading your diarrhea, Prissy, your line of thought is too linear sometimes.

    1. If you brought Chinese as slaves, do you think Chinese in America will be some lanky, emaciated, bamboo stick walking around in CA? Think about 400 years of man-made selection.

    2. You think Blacks are always stronger? 400 years of strong slave selection has made your vision blurred every time you look at a black guy, I figured. Blacks are chasing black pygmies in Africa continent.

    3. There are millions of White slaves walking around us, if you trace back their ancestry. But their “White” skin affords them to be free of ethno-stereotypes. Irish slaves married lower class British nannies and over time, you have so-called genteel Whites. They walk around us, they breathe among us, but you can’t hide their slave mentality that was passed down over generations.

    A linear thinking is, you replace some variables in your equation, as in most equation tends to be linear, then you extrapolate what might be a causative agent in your solution.

    America is a melting pot, and I still believe it is still a melting pot. But the pot has to cool down. Otherwise, it will explode.

    Instead of linear thinking, this is how I see.

    1. To build a white majority country, you need a sufficient supply of Whites. Where do you get? Yes, all lower class, uneducated Whites migrating to a new world in a name of “Better lives and dreams” Look at Australia, all convicts sent to down under, but guess what, over time, you have a White majority country. It’s not so genteel, it’s just a very basal instinct of species cloaked in a genteel skin i.e., to spread White sperms (be it convicts or not), not ovaries.

    2. To work for your country, you need strong men. So you’d select strong black men. Who can stand under a brutal sunlight without wincing their eyes? So another selection came along.

    3. You brought Chinese slaves to build railroads along with Irish slaves. Building railroad was different from picking cottons. So another selection came along.

    Somewhere along the selection, America was infected with Jews virus. It becomes parasitic.

    Jewish women married any Whites, over time, you have White looking Jewish, who are nothing to do with Judiasm to begin with, but the idea of being Jewish allow them to have a blank check "holocaust", and free from "slavery and racism" card.

    Jumping ahead, America now imports those desk-space enjoying species – Asians to work in an IT environment. Not because Asians are smart, but because 21st century needs those kinds of slaves.

    A constant supply of Africans who has nothing to do with past slavery, but they all become BLM in an instant once they landed on American soil. That is to keep down the White majority.

    All white immigrants become pornstars to cater to the need of those bald White men who can’t rely on White feminists, but have to settle down with those ugly looking Asian chicks.

    The melting pot indeed.
  25. This majority watches as mobs routinely storm podia and prevent politicians from speaking.

    I’m not so sure about this particular outrage. Personally, I’d much prefer to watch mob storming podiums than listen to politicians speaking.

    True, this is probably indicative of yet another outrage: a real low quality of the politicians, but authoritarianism is not likely to help with that…

    Read More
  26. Dear Fred:

    You do know that the reasons why a popular-authoritarian government might be difficult to establish and maintain.

    The “Silent Majority” is not really the majority in America any more, no thanks to relentless immigration, abortion and suicide.
    The “undesirables” in our society (especially blacks) have a lot of media defenders. You know first hand how the media hides black crime.
    The “undesirables” are also very hostile to white America and will find every way to give them hell.

    Here is a thought experiment: Let’s say someone far more hard-nosed than Trump is elected president (or maybe dictator?). He might have the racist views that Jared Taylor or Rich Spencer has, wanting America to be s white ethnostate. He might publicly vow to crack down on black crime and start executing black murderers and rapists by giving white vigilante groups emergency powers in a manner similar to what has happened in the Philippines under Rodrigo Duterte (a measure that I would, by the way, half-heartedly support).

    What happens if some white punks start to sense that blacks are now easy targets and start to murder and rape them en masses? Think Dylann Roof. Will such an government be willing to prosecute white crooks with the same vigor?
    What happens if vigilantes start to “accidentally” execute a lot of innocent blacks? You said that nearly all criminals bought to trial are guilty because the District Attorney will raise hell if he is given a case he can’t win. However, if crooks don’t have to be bought to trial, the police and white vigilantes might start pushing around a lot of innocent blacks for the heck of it. Think George Zimmerman. Lynching may have been the prime way Americans enforced law and order before there were courts but it has been known to ensnare innocent people from time to time. You should know that.
    If the previous 2 things start to occur, I am sure the media will give blacks as much support as possible. Blacks will use every option to resist. Maybe they’ll riot. Maybe they’ll find some other way to raise hell for the government.
    Here is another possible problem: You have documented a lot of recent fake rape claims against white men. How should an authoritarian government react toward them? A black government might execute the accused without a trial.

    Interesting times are ahead.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
    The examples of Dylann Roof and George Zimmerman are both terribly weak means of supporting the idea that whites would spontaneously start ethnically cleansing or genociding blacks, given the first chance, and that such an outcome would naturally result from curbing black crime with a Singaporean fist. How many lynchings were there in U.S. history, 3,000?

    Jared Taylor's essay on the contributing factors to Roof's rampage was run here at Unz.com. It was an atrocity and a gross injustice but the perp's motives are quite easily understood, he laid them before the world's eyes, after all.

    George Zimmerman, as far as I've read, was a well-intentioned neighborhood watchman. He spotted activity that was obviously suspicious and things quickly escalated, as they're wont to do given the involved parties. It wasn't some kind of sadistic mayhem carried out by a lunatic.

    This leads us to the history of lynching. I'm far from an expert but what I've read seems to indicate the vast majority of cases involved outrages of the kind featured in Colin Flaherty's books and videos. The system of extrajudicial punishment evolved as a response to federally-enforced equality for blacks and the consequent destabilization of Southern society. In an era before cars, whites could not simply move to the newest outlying suburb. The railroad baron and judge lived a 40-ounce toss from the black underclass. Such circumstances required a heavier hand than would be necessary today, a hand which often required leeway not permitted within the law's constraints. As the interstate highway system was constructed and the suburbs began springing up, distance and separation took up the role that terror had once played. This was better for everyone.

    None of this implies in the slightest that white hooligans would go on interracial murder sprees for laughs, no matter what signal was given. Lynchings were sometimes carried out by the very judges and lawmen who would have otherwise overseen the proceedings in court. In most cases, they were organized by at least semi-prominent, grown men. Are there cases of idle white youths taking up interracial serial killing as a hobby? Most whites would want absolutely nothing to do with the actual making of that societal sausage. They would never wade into the muck for fun. It seems there is no precedent for what you claim is a risk and no reason to believe it may happen with frequency in the future. Where it does, it will be an isolated matter handled by the criminal courts.

    , @Truth

    Here is a thought experiment: Let’s say someone far more hard-nosed than Trump is elected president (or maybe dictator?). He might have the racist views that Jared Taylor or Rich Spencer has, wanting America to be s white ethnostate. He might publicly vow to crack down on black crime and start executing black murderers and rapists by giving white vigilante groups emergency powers in a manner similar to what has happened in the Philippines under Rodrigo Duterte
     
    Yeah, and Lex Luthor might FINALLY get his hands on enough kryptonite to execute Superman also.

    Actually, that seems more connected to the real world.
  27. @Gene Su
    Dear Fred:

    You do know that the reasons why a popular-authoritarian government might be difficult to establish and maintain.

    The "Silent Majority" is not really the majority in America any more, no thanks to relentless immigration, abortion and suicide.
    The "undesirables" in our society (especially blacks) have a lot of media defenders. You know first hand how the media hides black crime.
    The "undesirables" are also very hostile to white America and will find every way to give them hell.

    Here is a thought experiment: Let's say someone far more hard-nosed than Trump is elected president (or maybe dictator?). He might have the racist views that Jared Taylor or Rich Spencer has, wanting America to be s white ethnostate. He might publicly vow to crack down on black crime and start executing black murderers and rapists by giving white vigilante groups emergency powers in a manner similar to what has happened in the Philippines under Rodrigo Duterte (a measure that I would, by the way, half-heartedly support).

    What happens if some white punks start to sense that blacks are now easy targets and start to murder and rape them en masses? Think Dylann Roof. Will such an government be willing to prosecute white crooks with the same vigor?
    What happens if vigilantes start to "accidentally" execute a lot of innocent blacks? You said that nearly all criminals bought to trial are guilty because the District Attorney will raise hell if he is given a case he can't win. However, if crooks don't have to be bought to trial, the police and white vigilantes might start pushing around a lot of innocent blacks for the heck of it. Think George Zimmerman. Lynching may have been the prime way Americans enforced law and order before there were courts but it has been known to ensnare innocent people from time to time. You should know that.
    If the previous 2 things start to occur, I am sure the media will give blacks as much support as possible. Blacks will use every option to resist. Maybe they'll riot. Maybe they'll find some other way to raise hell for the government.
    Here is another possible problem: You have documented a lot of recent fake rape claims against white men. How should an authoritarian government react toward them? A black government might execute the accused without a trial.

    Interesting times are ahead.

    The examples of Dylann Roof and George Zimmerman are both terribly weak means of supporting the idea that whites would spontaneously start ethnically cleansing or genociding blacks, given the first chance, and that such an outcome would naturally result from curbing black crime with a Singaporean fist. How many lynchings were there in U.S. history, 3,000?

    Jared Taylor’s essay on the contributing factors to Roof’s rampage was run here at Unz.com. It was an atrocity and a gross injustice but the perp’s motives are quite easily understood, he laid them before the world’s eyes, after all.

    George Zimmerman, as far as I’ve read, was a well-intentioned neighborhood watchman. He spotted activity that was obviously suspicious and things quickly escalated, as they’re wont to do given the involved parties. It wasn’t some kind of sadistic mayhem carried out by a lunatic.

    This leads us to the history of lynching. I’m far from an expert but what I’ve read seems to indicate the vast majority of cases involved outrages of the kind featured in Colin Flaherty’s books and videos. The system of extrajudicial punishment evolved as a response to federally-enforced equality for blacks and the consequent destabilization of Southern society. In an era before cars, whites could not simply move to the newest outlying suburb. The railroad baron and judge lived a 40-ounce toss from the black underclass. Such circumstances required a heavier hand than would be necessary today, a hand which often required leeway not permitted within the law’s constraints. As the interstate highway system was constructed and the suburbs began springing up, distance and separation took up the role that terror had once played. This was better for everyone.

    None of this implies in the slightest that white hooligans would go on interracial murder sprees for laughs, no matter what signal was given. Lynchings were sometimes carried out by the very judges and lawmen who would have otherwise overseen the proceedings in court. In most cases, they were organized by at least semi-prominent, grown men. Are there cases of idle white youths taking up interracial serial killing as a hobby? Most whites would want absolutely nothing to do with the actual making of that societal sausage. They would never wade into the muck for fun. It seems there is no precedent for what you claim is a risk and no reason to believe it may happen with frequency in the future. Where it does, it will be an isolated matter handled by the criminal courts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gene Su

    The system of extrajudicial punishment evolved as a response to federally-enforced equality for blacks and the consequent destabilization of Southern society.
     
    What I would seriously like to see happen is for blacks to start policing their own people. If a black Lee Kwan Yee or Rodrigo Duterte were to arise in sub-Saharan Africa, he might succeed at stomping out the senseless tribal violence and crime on the veldt. There are so many brutal black dictators in Africa. Why don't any of them attempt to bring law and order to their countries or tribes? Instead, all they do is look for ways to get welfare money from the West.

    I would also like to see blacks in America police their own neighborhoods. The last group to nearly succeed in suppressing crime were the black Muslims. If black watchmen were to patrol their own ghettos, they might be more effective than white policemen. Most especially, if black mobs were to unleash a gruesome retribution on every black thug who mugged a black person, raped a black girl, shot a black kid, and so on and so forth, crime would plummet.

    , @animalogic
    "None of this implies in the slightest that white hooligans would go on interracial murder sprees for laughs, no matter what signal was given"
    Just a point: if things descend to the level implied, "race" will be only one motive for mayhem. People of ALL races will take advantage of the ... confusion for their material benefit & because...well why not ? Revenge, resentment, even laughs...?
    Incidentally, "lynchings" were often popular, even celebrated events (postcards etc). Often the malfactor had been guilty of such horrendous crimes as looking at a white woman or (OH MY GOD !) smiling at a white woman. Mob justice: the good 'ol days...
  28. Authoritarianism? Whatever! I just want to know what it will take to get Fred to leave his Mexican wife, move back to DC, and find a nice blue-eyed, obese, feminist gringa.

    Read More
  29. @Gene Su
    Dear Fred:

    You do know that the reasons why a popular-authoritarian government might be difficult to establish and maintain.

    The "Silent Majority" is not really the majority in America any more, no thanks to relentless immigration, abortion and suicide.
    The "undesirables" in our society (especially blacks) have a lot of media defenders. You know first hand how the media hides black crime.
    The "undesirables" are also very hostile to white America and will find every way to give them hell.

    Here is a thought experiment: Let's say someone far more hard-nosed than Trump is elected president (or maybe dictator?). He might have the racist views that Jared Taylor or Rich Spencer has, wanting America to be s white ethnostate. He might publicly vow to crack down on black crime and start executing black murderers and rapists by giving white vigilante groups emergency powers in a manner similar to what has happened in the Philippines under Rodrigo Duterte (a measure that I would, by the way, half-heartedly support).

    What happens if some white punks start to sense that blacks are now easy targets and start to murder and rape them en masses? Think Dylann Roof. Will such an government be willing to prosecute white crooks with the same vigor?
    What happens if vigilantes start to "accidentally" execute a lot of innocent blacks? You said that nearly all criminals bought to trial are guilty because the District Attorney will raise hell if he is given a case he can't win. However, if crooks don't have to be bought to trial, the police and white vigilantes might start pushing around a lot of innocent blacks for the heck of it. Think George Zimmerman. Lynching may have been the prime way Americans enforced law and order before there were courts but it has been known to ensnare innocent people from time to time. You should know that.
    If the previous 2 things start to occur, I am sure the media will give blacks as much support as possible. Blacks will use every option to resist. Maybe they'll riot. Maybe they'll find some other way to raise hell for the government.
    Here is another possible problem: You have documented a lot of recent fake rape claims against white men. How should an authoritarian government react toward them? A black government might execute the accused without a trial.

    Interesting times are ahead.

    Here is a thought experiment: Let’s say someone far more hard-nosed than Trump is elected president (or maybe dictator?). He might have the racist views that Jared Taylor or Rich Spencer has, wanting America to be s white ethnostate. He might publicly vow to crack down on black crime and start executing black murderers and rapists by giving white vigilante groups emergency powers in a manner similar to what has happened in the Philippines under Rodrigo Duterte

    Yeah, and Lex Luthor might FINALLY get his hands on enough kryptonite to execute Superman also.

    Actually, that seems more connected to the real world.

    Read More
  30. @Mao Cheng Ji
    What you're describing sounds more like a lynching impulse, than the authoritarian one. You need to calm down a bit.

    It’s a cycle. Low violence societies move toward permissiveness, which encourages violence in heterogeneous societies, which causes movement toward authoritarianism.
    As to the gang of rapists, I favor drawing and quartering, “pour encourager les autres.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    As to the gang of rapists, I favor drawing and quartering, “pour encourager les autres.”
     
    I don't like to sound like a liberal, but I don't know if this would be a particularly helpful example. You introduce more violence and cruelty, you probably aren't going to get less of it. He mentioned the ghetto, "the culture coarsens, imitating the ghetto". But there are actual ghettos all around; have you watched The Wire? The culture doesn't imitate the ghetto, it's just a natural ghetto culture...
  31. @pyrrhus
    It's a cycle. Low violence societies move toward permissiveness, which encourages violence in heterogeneous societies, which causes movement toward authoritarianism.
    As to the gang of rapists, I favor drawing and quartering, "pour encourager les autres."

    As to the gang of rapists, I favor drawing and quartering, “pour encourager les autres.”

    I don’t like to sound like a liberal, but I don’t know if this would be a particularly helpful example. You introduce more violence and cruelty, you probably aren’t going to get less of it. He mentioned the ghetto, “the culture coarsens, imitating the ghetto“. But there are actual ghettos all around; have you watched The Wire? The culture doesn’t imitate the ghetto, it’s just a natural ghetto culture…

    Read More
  32. @Negrolphin Pool
    The examples of Dylann Roof and George Zimmerman are both terribly weak means of supporting the idea that whites would spontaneously start ethnically cleansing or genociding blacks, given the first chance, and that such an outcome would naturally result from curbing black crime with a Singaporean fist. How many lynchings were there in U.S. history, 3,000?

    Jared Taylor's essay on the contributing factors to Roof's rampage was run here at Unz.com. It was an atrocity and a gross injustice but the perp's motives are quite easily understood, he laid them before the world's eyes, after all.

    George Zimmerman, as far as I've read, was a well-intentioned neighborhood watchman. He spotted activity that was obviously suspicious and things quickly escalated, as they're wont to do given the involved parties. It wasn't some kind of sadistic mayhem carried out by a lunatic.

    This leads us to the history of lynching. I'm far from an expert but what I've read seems to indicate the vast majority of cases involved outrages of the kind featured in Colin Flaherty's books and videos. The system of extrajudicial punishment evolved as a response to federally-enforced equality for blacks and the consequent destabilization of Southern society. In an era before cars, whites could not simply move to the newest outlying suburb. The railroad baron and judge lived a 40-ounce toss from the black underclass. Such circumstances required a heavier hand than would be necessary today, a hand which often required leeway not permitted within the law's constraints. As the interstate highway system was constructed and the suburbs began springing up, distance and separation took up the role that terror had once played. This was better for everyone.

    None of this implies in the slightest that white hooligans would go on interracial murder sprees for laughs, no matter what signal was given. Lynchings were sometimes carried out by the very judges and lawmen who would have otherwise overseen the proceedings in court. In most cases, they were organized by at least semi-prominent, grown men. Are there cases of idle white youths taking up interracial serial killing as a hobby? Most whites would want absolutely nothing to do with the actual making of that societal sausage. They would never wade into the muck for fun. It seems there is no precedent for what you claim is a risk and no reason to believe it may happen with frequency in the future. Where it does, it will be an isolated matter handled by the criminal courts.

    The system of extrajudicial punishment evolved as a response to federally-enforced equality for blacks and the consequent destabilization of Southern society.

    What I would seriously like to see happen is for blacks to start policing their own people. If a black Lee Kwan Yee or Rodrigo Duterte were to arise in sub-Saharan Africa, he might succeed at stomping out the senseless tribal violence and crime on the veldt. There are so many brutal black dictators in Africa. Why don’t any of them attempt to bring law and order to their countries or tribes? Instead, all they do is look for ways to get welfare money from the West.

    I would also like to see blacks in America police their own neighborhoods. The last group to nearly succeed in suppressing crime were the black Muslims. If black watchmen were to patrol their own ghettos, they might be more effective than white policemen. Most especially, if black mobs were to unleash a gruesome retribution on every black thug who mugged a black person, raped a black girl, shot a black kid, and so on and so forth, crime would plummet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    What I would seriously like to see happen is for blacks to start policing their own people. If a black Lee Kwan Yee or Rodrigo Duterte were to arise in sub-Saharan Africa, he might succeed at stomping out the senseless tribal violence and crime on the veldt. There are so many brutal black dictators in Africa. Why don’t any of them attempt to bring law and order to their countries or tribes? Instead, all they do is look for ways to get welfare money from the West.
     
    My Gosh, Eugene; I don't even know where to start with this.

    1. There are police forces, as far as I'm aware in every one of the 39 countries in Africa.

    2. Leaders don't "arise" anywhere. They are planted, or at least sanctioned by the US/Anglo/Euro Military Industrial Complex

    3. The reason that there is "senseless" violence and crime is that historical enemies, from thousands of years, have been forced together by Duh Man's arbitrarily drawn borders. If I re-drew the borders of Europe tomorrow and forced Frogs and Krauts together and told them to self-govern, there'd be war within a month. See Belfast, and the Serb-Croat area for an example.

    4. There are so many "brutal black dictators" in Africa, because your government has come upon the very logical, and obvious maxim, that it is easier to deal with one puppet for 30 years than to have to make puppets of 100 people in a legislature, and one new one every 4 years. Please re-read #2.

    5. Why wouldn't anyone want law and order in their country? This one is beyond me, but I'm guessing black people just like 13 year old child soldiers, the same way Brits like the royal family...boggles the mind!*

    6. There is no such thing as "welfare money", except to Israel, or arguably Germany or Japan, where we spend so many billions subsidizing their defense. There are no military bases in S-S Africa, and every dollar spent is meant to make 10. Same with the charities, all fake, just meant to make the masonic cabal rich.

    Are you really a Chin, Gene? I have to start feeling you're a white guy, the IQ doesn't seem high enough.

    *This was sarcasm, I wouldn't think I'd have to point it out, but....uh...
  33. Singapore can afford policy that eliminates drugs and Iceland can afford policy that penalizes bankers because they are small and peripheral. Larger countries will never be allowed to do the same because they are big lucrative markets for drug mafias and banking mafias.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ram
    Singapore can ACT as it DOES because it has sensible leadership. Remember that we used to vilify them as being communists. Today it is the most expensive City in the world.
    , @Che Guava
    You have a point, but to call Singapore 'peripheral' without qualification jars on me.

    They may have branched out now, but the basis of the economic status they inherited from the British Empire was Raffles' choice of a perfect site for a *pivotal* (hardly peripheral) trading port.

    They also have a large diplomatic weight for their size, not just in ASEAN.

    Fred's quote of the notice ”There is a death penalty in Singapore for possession in [sic:of] drugs. This penalty is enforced.” is almost verbatim.

    However, I am reliably informed that the top techno-music clubs were awash in ecstasy, partaken in by brats of party leaders and the upper and upper-middle classes, plus expats.

    I am not sure of the situation now, guess it is still similar.

    Singapore sticks to this policy more out of the same kind of mentality that makes itself, Korea and Japan determined to *not* accept hordes of psychopathic invaders ('refugees') from the UNHCR.

    The other factor in that, of course, is the self-racism of white western SJWs, and that the non-white 'western' SJWs from recent immigrant backgrounds only care about SJ insofar as it is inimical to their hosts (as in of parasites).

    As many pointed out, if that Banglashi careerist and hypocrite (BLACK LIVES MATTER x 100) cared about anything other than toadying, he would have an interest in the real abuses in Bangladesh and just about all OIC states.

    I would bet a fortune that he doesn't ''check his privilege' on visits home, hell, he sure doesn't bother doing so in the USA.

    Point of interest re. S'pores drug policies:on independence, first as part of, then from, the Malayan Federation, they had a second-hand legacy from the Opium Wars and the particular affinity of many Chinese people for opium. There were very many addicts and dens. That is the historical root of their policies.
  34. There is a war. After the war there is a period of piousness. the next period is a slow decline of moral, and sense of responsibility’ than there is war again.

    Read More
  35. The “authoritarian impulse” can be exploited and is IMHO exploited by

    secret services,
    war propaganda institutions and
    psychological operations.

    The “muslim” terrorist threat is an example of that.

    Who is financing, organising, training and deploying the so called “muslim” terrorists? Why is every major “terror attack” suspiciously linked to “intelligence services” or suspicious western or Israeli think tanks or media components?

    Who benefits?

    Read More
  36. @Bragadocious
    I think Fred sits in his barcalounger on Lake Chapala and dreams about an America on fire. Maybe it makes him feel better about his decision to decamp to Mexico. Problem is, he doesn't understand this country anymore. For one thing, people may be angry about a lot of things, and one of those things is illegal immigration. But Fred has nothing to say about that, except that Mexicans are really really smart, probably smarter than we are -- and we should embrace 10 million squat monsters. (Like I said, he doesn't understand America)

    He also seems to think people are thisclose to picking up their AR-15s and storming the bastille. Not bloody likely. Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks. We have plenty to lose and will not overreact to absurd made for TV riots in Ferguson, Missouri. Let the coloreds kill each other, they have no souls anyway.

    You make your point- but I think that you are unintentionally accepting defeat in the culture wars-because you have “stuff”. There will be no revolutionary advances in society if you are unwilling to lose it all. Anyhow, fortune favors the bold- and the masses will shuffle along behind whoever is winning..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rod1963
    He doesn't get that most of people's wealth is based on a hyper inflated stock market and real estate bubble. In short it's not real wealth, but speculative.

    If these current speculative bubbles ever collapse, you'll see a lot of well off middle-class and upper middle-class types wealth vanish almost immediately. And you'll see state pensioners get a hair cut with a chain saw. This will turn a lot of folks from being indifferent to willing to kill some SOB's and blame the FedGov.

    And if the SNAP and EBT cards stop working, well it's katie bar the door.

    This is why the elites went nuts in 2008 to try and keep the banking and stock markets from tanking after the real-estate bubble burst. Had the Fed and Congress not intervened, we'd have had a revolution.

    .
  37. @The Real John Jeremiah Smith

    What you’re describing sounds more like a lynching impulse, than the authoritarian one. You need to calm down a bit.
     
    I've read a few of your comments. You're an idiot. Why do you read any of Reed at all? You are stupid like a bag of broccoli.

    A "lynching" is carried out by a group of angry citizens. "Authoritarian" actions are taken by government. Perhaps idiots are confused about the difference.

    Got that? Now, stop it. Just stop it.

    He said a “lynching impulse”. From the opinion of yoursef your words imply you should be able to see that you have probably missed his point. The “lynching impulse” can surely be understood as supporting violent solutions to problems of crime without due process of law.

    Read More
  38. @Bragadocious
    What I meant is most Americans have some combination of those things. We know around 2/3 of Americans live in an owner-occupied home. These are not people who will start a revolution over some monkeyshines in a Ferguson, MO convenience store. Fred's nuts, or he's just trolling. That was my point.

    You’re right – revolution is some way off. However…
    Is it an exaggeration to say that – beyond appearances – American governments actually CARE about the average citizen ? Seems to me Government (given its marching orders by the real rulers) has been slowly heating up their poor frog-like citizens for 40 odd years.
    It’s not just systemic corruption, rampant injustice (civil forfeiture is the one that boggles my mind most) & austerity that threaten: it’s the fact that elites no longer even seem to care whether their feudal attitude to the public is seen & heard. Naked class contempt…
    The average citizen will continue to wear it….until all the inherent filth bursts forth, like a bloated gangerous wound. And then it’s too late… Now is the time for citizens to develop a coherent philosophy & organise independent of the state & ruling class…. To quote (believe it or not) Johnny Rotten: “Anger is an energy”

    Read More
  39. @Negrolphin Pool
    The examples of Dylann Roof and George Zimmerman are both terribly weak means of supporting the idea that whites would spontaneously start ethnically cleansing or genociding blacks, given the first chance, and that such an outcome would naturally result from curbing black crime with a Singaporean fist. How many lynchings were there in U.S. history, 3,000?

    Jared Taylor's essay on the contributing factors to Roof's rampage was run here at Unz.com. It was an atrocity and a gross injustice but the perp's motives are quite easily understood, he laid them before the world's eyes, after all.

    George Zimmerman, as far as I've read, was a well-intentioned neighborhood watchman. He spotted activity that was obviously suspicious and things quickly escalated, as they're wont to do given the involved parties. It wasn't some kind of sadistic mayhem carried out by a lunatic.

    This leads us to the history of lynching. I'm far from an expert but what I've read seems to indicate the vast majority of cases involved outrages of the kind featured in Colin Flaherty's books and videos. The system of extrajudicial punishment evolved as a response to federally-enforced equality for blacks and the consequent destabilization of Southern society. In an era before cars, whites could not simply move to the newest outlying suburb. The railroad baron and judge lived a 40-ounce toss from the black underclass. Such circumstances required a heavier hand than would be necessary today, a hand which often required leeway not permitted within the law's constraints. As the interstate highway system was constructed and the suburbs began springing up, distance and separation took up the role that terror had once played. This was better for everyone.

    None of this implies in the slightest that white hooligans would go on interracial murder sprees for laughs, no matter what signal was given. Lynchings were sometimes carried out by the very judges and lawmen who would have otherwise overseen the proceedings in court. In most cases, they were organized by at least semi-prominent, grown men. Are there cases of idle white youths taking up interracial serial killing as a hobby? Most whites would want absolutely nothing to do with the actual making of that societal sausage. They would never wade into the muck for fun. It seems there is no precedent for what you claim is a risk and no reason to believe it may happen with frequency in the future. Where it does, it will be an isolated matter handled by the criminal courts.

    “None of this implies in the slightest that white hooligans would go on interracial murder sprees for laughs, no matter what signal was given”
    Just a point: if things descend to the level implied, “race” will be only one motive for mayhem. People of ALL races will take advantage of the … confusion for their material benefit & because…well why not ? Revenge, resentment, even laughs…?
    Incidentally, “lynchings” were often popular, even celebrated events (postcards etc). Often the malfactor had been guilty of such horrendous crimes as looking at a white woman or (OH MY GOD !) smiling at a white woman. Mob justice: the good ‘ol days…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
    Sure enough, here's a case where postcards were made and circulated. But it involved the brutal rape and murder of a farmer's wife. The perp apparently hadn't even bothered to change out of his bloody clothes by the time the police arrived to question him.

    That night, sheriff's deputies traveled to Washington's home, finding him in front of the house wearing blood-stained overalls. He attributed the stains to a nosebleed.
     
  40. Fred would you care to analyse and describe the similarities and differences between the methods you were once rightly confident as an observant journalist justified expressed views like “Today in America everyone is angry” et seq (a little poetic hyperbole allowed) and, on the other hand, your current sources and methods.

    When you began to form hypotheses out of patterns you observed from plenty of Linh Dinh type listening in a wider range of groups and classes than his, and from the media, and then began to test the reality of the hypotheses against wider reality (sometimes with pretty obvious conclusions) you lived and worked in America.

    How do you get it right now?

    As you must use a lot of material from the www how do you assess and allow for the different characteristics of social media and blogs, how it affects/encourages indiscioline in utterance, what weight and influence it has v. mirroring, and how you choose from 50 million sites?

    Read More
  41. “Allahu Akbar” will have some meaning when the populace is braying for the blood of the As Saud family and their murdering days come to an end.

    Read More
  42. @utu
    Singapore can afford policy that eliminates drugs and Iceland can afford policy that penalizes bankers because they are small and peripheral. Larger countries will never be allowed to do the same because they are big lucrative markets for drug mafias and banking mafias.

    Singapore can ACT as it DOES because it has sensible leadership. Remember that we used to vilify them as being communists. Today it is the most expensive City in the world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu

    "Singapore can ACT as it DOES because it has sensible leadership."
     
    You still do not get. Having a sensible leadership is a necessary condition but not sufficient to have effective policy on drugs. You must be allowed to implement right policies. And in the case of Singapore like in the case of Iceland and their action against the bankers they are permitted to do so because they are small and irrelevant. Their actions do not cut too much into the profits of drug mafia and banking industry.
    , @Che Guava
    Well, Ram, you make a strong case for biggest ignoramus on the thread with your assertion:

    Remember that we used to vilify them as being communists.
     
    Although not part of 'we', only a sympathiser with some, I don't remember that. Nobody else here would, either. Perhaps you come from one of those parallel dimensions or a special hopital?

    Please don't say anything when you know nothing. There was never even a communist state with a similar name.

    Singapore is a one-party state, and the ever-ruling People's Action Party *was* a member of the Socialist International. They were kicked out a very long time ago.

    The party's original logo was based on the logo of the British Union of Fascists. The polity is fascist in the politico-social-economic sense (as opposed to the name-calling nonsense). The Singaporean variant is 'shopping fascism'.

    A communist insurrection was very active in the late '50s and early '60s, but it was blocked by sending willing activists and leaders to China, and locking up (along with people in the same roles from other socialist parties) the rest.
  43. @john cronk
    A couple of thoughts:

    Absolutely right about Singapore. Take a look at statistics on crime there....their system works beautifully, in a tiny landmass with five and a half million people of Chinese, Indonesian, Malaysian and Indian origins and the respective religions of each, including Islam.

    Something better is needed in response to the current situation than what you're describing. If the justice and police systems were reformed, prisons punished instead of just housed, capital punishment was brought back and used effectively, things would straighten out quickly.

    Absolutely right about Singapore. Take a look at statistics on crime there….their system works beautifully, in a tiny landmass with five and a half million people of Chinese, Indonesian, Malaysian and Indian origins and the respective religions of each, including Islam.

    Singapore “works” insofar as people are terrified to commit crimes (or be falsely accused of same), including trafficking or possessing illicit drugs (or spitting on the sidewalk). It doesn’t “work” and isn’t “beautiful” by traditional civilized Western standards, where people desire to be more at ease and behave according to societal standards first out of notions of shared moral and cultural values, a developed conscience, empathy, concern for good reputation, care for the functioning of society, etc., and only after these are breached should the State or Crown intervene – and then the accused is afforded meaningful process (presumption of innocence, the right to develop evidence and confront witnesses, etc.).

    The “beautifully working” government that can hang you in the course of a few weeks for possession of contraband has an awfully tempting tool at its disposal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Equality and social justice are beautiful concepts, along with men who are born as woman and empathy to welcome rapists into your society, not to mention an endless welfare system to take care of everyone, regardless if the budget can afford it.

    Singapore is fully aware of "traditional civilized Western standards", which actually aren't too far in some ways from "traditional Confucian standards." But its impossible to simply expect that people are naturally "moral" when there is going to be a large migrant population, and as a merchantile city-state, this is inevitable. At the very least, assimilation to Confucian ideals would take growing up from childhood.

    When that doesn't happen, this is when Singapore uses the second line of Legalist thinking, which is to be harsh and strictly defined.
    , @Zenarchy
    Exactly.

    May as well give the death penalty for EVERY crime if it lowers the rates.

    The most laughable and sad is the part where they hang people for weed even though a much deadlier drug - alcohol - is legal. Make laws like these in countries where people don't have extremely slavish mentalities, and you'll have wars in the streets...

    Why don't the people who praise Singapur ever praise the sharia in Saudi Arabia? It makes more sense since at least you can blame fascism on the prophet. Constitutions are written by ordinary mortals that's why they can be completely rewritten within years.

    Why not praise Stalinism? I mean smuggling marijuana is a matter of personal morality not deadly danger, so it's closer to criticizing the state than to committing murder.

  44. The reason we are no longer that homogenous 1950′s world is to help pave the way for authoritarianism run by the globalists and deep state with probably a leftist veneer.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    True. So when the revolution does come we need to kill as many of the globalists and leftists/fascists as possible. The only way to win is through complete decapitation of the leadership/intelligentsia. Even the ones that get away.
  45. Nah, he’s describing exactly what the Philippines are getting with Duterte. You could argue that it’s still lynching, but there’s a difference between the locals stringing up a rapist and “right wing death squads” sanctioned by the government.

    Read More
  46. @another fred
    When chaos comes it will be short lived, the mechanisms for suppression being in place and waiting. The man on the horse will be but a symbol, a talisman for the vast State beneath. Later, when the biowars begin they will be welcomed by some as were the Germanic barbarians after Rome had rotted from within.

    When chaos comes it will be short lived, the mechanisms for suppression being in place and waiting.

    this 100% describes democracy in the usa and the west. the entire system is designed to suppress or neutralize descent/opposition :)

    Read More
  47. @john cronk
    A couple of thoughts:

    Absolutely right about Singapore. Take a look at statistics on crime there....their system works beautifully, in a tiny landmass with five and a half million people of Chinese, Indonesian, Malaysian and Indian origins and the respective religions of each, including Islam.

    Something better is needed in response to the current situation than what you're describing. If the justice and police systems were reformed, prisons punished instead of just housed, capital punishment was brought back and used effectively, things would straighten out quickly.

    The justice and police systems can’t be reformed.

    Read More
  48. @Priss Factor
    "The authoritarian impulse arises when legitimate government can’t or won’t maintain order."

    That's not what is happening. The rising anger is about organicism. We are all organisms, and so we have organic drives and instincts. These instincts are for survival, defense, and self-preservation, but they can also be about aggression, invasion, and violence(as all organisms, and humans are animal-organisms too, violent by nature), which can cause much havoc.
    So, we created society and the state to take up the role of peace-maker and peace-enforcer.
    We leave it up to the state to maintain order by enacting and enforcing laws. That way, our organicist need for self-preservation and security is served by the apparatus of the state. That way, we can have state-sanctioned Rule of Law instead of the vigilante justice of humans-as-instinctual-animal-mobs or vendetta-justice of human-as-honor-bound-clan-members(like in Sicily). So, all states, even democratic ones, are by nature authoritarian. They have the power to enact and enforce laws, and we have to adhere to those laws.

    The problem of the current West is not lack of authority or authoritarianism. It is due to the problem of MISPLACED authority and authoritarianism. The problem is not that the state won't do its part to enact and enforce laws. The problem is the state is enforcing and enacting the WRONG kinds of laws against the wrong kinds of people.
    A state exists to protect its people(ethnos), territory, culture, and heritage from threats posed by foreigners and would-be-invaders. And Western nations used to do this. So, what changed? The Jewish globalists took over as elites. Jews are a minority in Western nations, and they are paranoid. They think the majority population of white goyim might rise up and come after them. Now, such fears were once understandable because there was overt hostility and even naked aggression against Jews in the past. But things have changed profoundly since the end of WWII. Attitudes have changed, and white people no longer hate Jews, and most white folks don't mind Jewish success. But Jews still have this deep-rooted fear and loathing of white majority power. So, Jews used their influence in the West to undermine all notions of white majority identity, interest, and power. And white cuck-collaborator elites(bought by Jewish money or mind-colonized by Jewish PC) go along with this arrangement.

    The result is PC, a form of authoritarianism that uses the power of law, media, and education to suppress anything associated with white identity, white pride, white territory, and white power. PC is authoritarian. It arrests people for saying the 'wrong' thing. In the UK, some guy was arrested for cracking a joke about Mandela on Twitter. In Germany, Merkel the hideous bitch has pushed laws that go after Germans who denounce Muslim 'refugees'. Swedish state goes after people who denounce immigration as a form of invasion and displacement. PC Swedes are secular-lutheran-puritans of 'social justice' that says whites are virtuous if and only if they cuck out to Jews, homos, and non-whites.
    So, the problem is not lack of authoritarianism but misplaced authoritarianism that favors aliens, minorities, and invaders than native folks. Jews want it this way. Because Jews are a minority elite in these nations, they want the state to favor the ideal of minority 'rights' and minority power than the identities/interests of native majorities. So, natives should have no special identity, no special history, and no special sense of territory. Earnest and naive do-goody Swedes have drunk this Jewish globo-Kool-aid more than any other people, and they are now saying Swedes have no history and no land to call their own. So, Sweden is to be open to all peoples. This craziness is enforced with authoritarianism in Sweden. All Swedes must consent to it .. or else.

    In the US, the problem is not lack of authoritarianism when it comes to black crime. The problem is too much PC authoritarianism on the issue of race. Elite power is employed to hunt down and destroy anyone who dares to question or counter the PC narrative. Charles Murray's views on race differences in IQ are mild stuff, but for them he was exiled from respectable community for a long time, and recently he was attacked by Middlebury PC Janissary.

    If there were no PC and if Americans could speak freely and honesty, we would have much better state of affairs since real problems would be addressed and worked on. It's like honest diagnosis of illness is necessary in order to come up with the right cure. If honesty is made taboo in medical diagnosis, the disease cannot be treated. Imagine if doctors are not allowed to call a cancer a cancer but must blame it on anything but cancer.

    On the issue of crime and racial violence, we would have a much better diagnosis of what is ailing the West if we could speak honestly. If honesty and truth replaced PC, people would sa, "It's blacks, not 'teens' and 'youths', who are going around bashing people. And blacks act like this because they are naturally stronger, more muscular, and more aggressive. So, they go around kicking non-white butt and cause all sorts of problems." That is so simple and so true.
    Some try to blame black violence on slavery, but does anyone really believe the US would have the same racial problems if it had brought over Chinese than Africans as slaves? Even as angry descendants of Chinese slaves, the little yellow guys wouldn't be scaring white folks half to death. It's like native of Mexico suffered a lot under the Spanish for many centuries, but most people don't fear Mexicans because most of them look like Guillermo.

    We need to speak the truth on race and racial problems. But PC authoritarianism ruthlessly destroys the reputation, career, and life of anyone who speaks honestly on the race issue. PC authoritarianism clamps down on truth, honesty, and candidness. It blunts Occam's Razor. PC is the switchblade of BS.

    So, the current rising anger is not about the Authoritarian Impulse but the Counter-Authoritarian Impulse. Honest people are getting sick of PC authoritarianism that favors the globalist elites, Jewish supremacists, black thugs, Muslim hordes, US military machine(that does the INVADE that leads to INVITE, something both Republicans and Democrats endorse), the white cucks who shill out to the GLOB, the reconquista Pepe Gonzalezes, Chinese sharks and Hindu weasels, homosexuals and trannies, and ghastly Negroes.

    The Counter-Authoritarian Impulse is anti-PC. It is against the Enforcement of Lies. It is against the Power of Propaganda that crushes the Truth that honest people can see with their own eyes. It is against the enforced suppression of white identity, white pride, white power, and white territoriality.

    Sure, some may feel that violence is necessary to bring about a new order, but most people who oppose PC want real freedom(especially from Negroes and excessive Diversity), not authoritarianism.
    We already have an autocratic/authoritarian political-social order that doesn't allow free speech. In the EU, free speech is illegal. In the US, free speech is effectively dead because anyone who dares to speak the truth will be destroyed politically or economically. Also, college professors have raised entire generations of thugs to attack and punch 'nazis'. The MSM didn't condemn the violence at Berkeley against Milo and at Middlebury against bald-headed Murray.

    The current PC authoritarianism is against the natural impulse of white racial organism. White human organisms want safety, security, and survival. At least those with healthy natural instincts do. Sadly, too many whites have had their minds colonized-and-infected by PC virus, and as such, they've been reprogrammed to identify with the Other than with the Self. It's like ants of one colony can be reprogrammed to serve another colony. It's like what the Turks did to Greek/Christian boys by turning them into Janissary.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuOzSWtxRw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzYM1VImKyM

    If there had been no PC authoritarianism, people would have spoken the truth and expressed their racial/national interests in the West. And then, the state would have been mindful of those truths & those sentiments and would have acted accordingly to enact and enforce the kinds of laws to maintain the security and survival of the native majority population.

    But the state was taken over by globalists who favored elite-minority-privilege-and-supremacism above all else. So, the state went from liberal-democratic-patriotic to authoritarian-PC-globalist. What is now called 'liberal democracy' is anything but. All of the West is ruled by globalist-oligarch-gang, and many of these people are Jewish who fear, loathe, and hate any notion of white gentile identity, pride, power, and territory. So, they push 'diversity' as a 'liberal democratic' value when, in fact, diversity makes democracy much less tenable since a diverse nation generally has people voting along racial/tribal lines.

    Worst of all, the globalists seek to totally shame and humiliate white men --- the warriors of the white race --- by turning white boys into pansy cucks who cheer on the colonization of white wombs by Negroes to hatch black babies. Womb Colonization is more destructive than Land Colonization. After all, even if a people's land is colonized by another people, the people can survive as a race, culture, and identity. But when the women of a race have their wombs colonized by the men of the invasive race, then they hatch children for the enemy men. (Spanish Conquistadors colonized the wombs of native women in the Americas, and the resulting Mestizo population has served the Empire than resist it.) Today, globalists use mass media to spread jungle fever to turn white boys into cucks and white women into muds whose wombs hatch black babies, the main enemy of the white race and of civilization in general. The white race is getting bullwhipped by globalism.

    Not all rage is authoritarian. The American Revolutionary Impulse against Britain was not authoritarian. It was for want of freedom and independence.
    And we are seeing the same kind of spirit rising among awakened whites who, unlike asleep hibernating ones, realize what's really at stake. They want liberation, independence, and freedom from PC tyranny. Some may hope for a strong leader to lead the way, but their ultimate goal is freedom and independence, not to live under a tyrant.

    Attitudes have changed, and white people no longer hate Jews, and most white folks don’t mind Jewish success. But Jews still have this deep-rooted fear and loathing of white majority power. So, Jews used their influence in the West to undermine all notions of white majority identity, interest, and power. And white cuck-collaborator elites(bought by Jewish money or mind-colonized by Jewish PC) go along with this arrangement.

    Ever wonder why? Could it be that it all starts with Sesame Street at about age three. Tended carefully by a church that worships the crucified (((Christ))). Run by men in dresses. Hmmmmm?

    Read More
  49. May 5, 2016 The Myth of Authority

    This video, created and submitted by”GeoShifter,” was the winner of the recent video contest, to see who could make the best video to go along with the narration.

    Read More
  50. @john cronk
    A couple of thoughts:

    Absolutely right about Singapore. Take a look at statistics on crime there....their system works beautifully, in a tiny landmass with five and a half million people of Chinese, Indonesian, Malaysian and Indian origins and the respective religions of each, including Islam.

    Something better is needed in response to the current situation than what you're describing. If the justice and police systems were reformed, prisons punished instead of just housed, capital punishment was brought back and used effectively, things would straighten out quickly.

    It mostly works by being very small. By having draconian policies, it first seeks to discourage potential troublemakers from coming in the first place, and by making exit, if desired, really is. So while I like how well its run, there’s no doubt that it largely exists by offloading a lot of hard problems to its neighbors.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    Singapore is an artificially propped up country :) it is the reward for the TTP, it geo location and asian pivot :)
  51. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Alec Leamas

    Absolutely right about Singapore. Take a look at statistics on crime there….their system works beautifully, in a tiny landmass with five and a half million people of Chinese, Indonesian, Malaysian and Indian origins and the respective religions of each, including Islam.
     
    Singapore "works" insofar as people are terrified to commit crimes (or be falsely accused of same), including trafficking or possessing illicit drugs (or spitting on the sidewalk). It doesn't "work" and isn't "beautiful" by traditional civilized Western standards, where people desire to be more at ease and behave according to societal standards first out of notions of shared moral and cultural values, a developed conscience, empathy, concern for good reputation, care for the functioning of society, etc., and only after these are breached should the State or Crown intervene - and then the accused is afforded meaningful process (presumption of innocence, the right to develop evidence and confront witnesses, etc.).

    The "beautifully working" government that can hang you in the course of a few weeks for possession of contraband has an awfully tempting tool at its disposal.

    Equality and social justice are beautiful concepts, along with men who are born as woman and empathy to welcome rapists into your society, not to mention an endless welfare system to take care of everyone, regardless if the budget can afford it.

    Singapore is fully aware of “traditional civilized Western standards”, which actually aren’t too far in some ways from “traditional Confucian standards.” But its impossible to simply expect that people are naturally “moral” when there is going to be a large migrant population, and as a merchantile city-state, this is inevitable. At the very least, assimilation to Confucian ideals would take growing up from childhood.

    When that doesn’t happen, this is when Singapore uses the second line of Legalist thinking, which is to be harsh and strictly defined.

    Read More
  52. @Daniel Chieh
    It mostly works by being very small. By having draconian policies, it first seeks to discourage potential troublemakers from coming in the first place, and by making exit, if desired, really is. So while I like how well its run, there's no doubt that it largely exists by offloading a lot of hard problems to its neighbors.

    Singapore is an artificially propped up country :) it is the reward for the TTP, it geo location and asian pivot :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    For me, an eye-opening experience was when an extreme white-nationalist friend of mine moved there for work. This is someone who unabashedly is pro-Nazi, talks about how much he admires Hitler, and the value of white ethnostates. So, yes, as an outright fascist he might not be the most representative of most, but I thought its an interesting ancedote.

    He contacted me the other day and was trying to tell me to move there. He was like "this place is wonderful, everything is beautiful, it actually feels happy in the atmosphere" and we talked about some of his beliefs; he concluded "diversity is horrible, but somehow they make it work. I would rather live here than my own country. Strange to say, I know, but truth."

    That said, his country is Germany, so take that as you will. And I suppose that he's arguably a fascist admiring a fascist-lite country.

  53. I’ll posit an alternative explanation derived from studying psychology:

    Real income decreases provoke holiness spirals.

    Even though, in reality, as people we are extremely wealthy from a material perspective, our mental position is relative and if as a young person you can’t afford to buy a house now while your parents could, you’re probably going to get increasingly irritated and look to blame someone. This leads to polarization of society.

    You see this in Japan too, and as real income declines, Shintoism becomes hugely popular. And if you think that social justice signaling is a religion too…

    Everyone gets along pretty well when the pie keeps increasing, but when the pie is shrinking, everyone gets angrier and wants more of their slice of the pie. The detailed reasoning for it can come later, the emotion hits first.

    Read More
  54. @Alec Leamas

    Absolutely right about Singapore. Take a look at statistics on crime there….their system works beautifully, in a tiny landmass with five and a half million people of Chinese, Indonesian, Malaysian and Indian origins and the respective religions of each, including Islam.
     
    Singapore "works" insofar as people are terrified to commit crimes (or be falsely accused of same), including trafficking or possessing illicit drugs (or spitting on the sidewalk). It doesn't "work" and isn't "beautiful" by traditional civilized Western standards, where people desire to be more at ease and behave according to societal standards first out of notions of shared moral and cultural values, a developed conscience, empathy, concern for good reputation, care for the functioning of society, etc., and only after these are breached should the State or Crown intervene - and then the accused is afforded meaningful process (presumption of innocence, the right to develop evidence and confront witnesses, etc.).

    The "beautifully working" government that can hang you in the course of a few weeks for possession of contraband has an awfully tempting tool at its disposal.

    Exactly.

    May as well give the death penalty for EVERY crime if it lowers the rates.

    The most laughable and sad is the part where they hang people for weed even though a much deadlier drug – alcohol – is legal. Make laws like these in countries where people don’t have extremely slavish mentalities, and you’ll have wars in the streets…

    Why don’t the people who praise Singapur ever praise the sharia in Saudi Arabia? It makes more sense since at least you can blame fascism on the prophet. Constitutions are written by ordinary mortals that’s why they can be completely rewritten within years.

    Why not praise Stalinism? I mean smuggling marijuana is a matter of personal morality not deadly danger, so it’s closer to criticizing the state than to committing murder.

    Read More
  55. In North-South War news, the Southern strategic offensive thrust is stalled along two main salients:
    - Along the Mississippi river from St. Louis to Detroit and Chicago
    - Along the Atlantic coast from Baltimore to Camden and Newark.

    The new White House and Department of Justice are no longer providing air cover.

    Read More
  56. Mar 25, 2017 To Defend Civilization We Must First Understand It (by Dan Sanchez)

    Dan Sanchez asks whether the pro-Trump right or anti-Trump left are the true champions of civilization, with insights from Plato, Adam Smith and Ludwig von Mises.

    https://youtu.be/sWFs71xkqFw

    Read More
  57. @animalogic
    "None of this implies in the slightest that white hooligans would go on interracial murder sprees for laughs, no matter what signal was given"
    Just a point: if things descend to the level implied, "race" will be only one motive for mayhem. People of ALL races will take advantage of the ... confusion for their material benefit & because...well why not ? Revenge, resentment, even laughs...?
    Incidentally, "lynchings" were often popular, even celebrated events (postcards etc). Often the malfactor had been guilty of such horrendous crimes as looking at a white woman or (OH MY GOD !) smiling at a white woman. Mob justice: the good 'ol days...

    Sure enough, here’s a case where postcards were made and circulated. But it involved the brutal rape and murder of a farmer’s wife. The perp apparently hadn’t even bothered to change out of his bloody clothes by the time the police arrived to question him.

    That night, sheriff’s deputies traveled to Washington’s home, finding him in front of the house wearing blood-stained overalls. He attributed the stains to a nosebleed.

    Read More
  58. And what drives the madness of political correctness, bans on free speech, and anti white racism?

    You guessed it:
    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    They are scientifically impossible frauds.

    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Nothing changes while The Big Lie is in place.

    “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”.
    - Arthur Schopenhauer

    The ‘holocaust’ narrative doesn’t hold up to scrutiny so Jews call for more censorship of free speech on the internet.
    http://freetheinternetfromdenial.wesign.it/en

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

    Read More
  59. @Astuteobservor II
    Singapore is an artificially propped up country :) it is the reward for the TTP, it geo location and asian pivot :)

    For me, an eye-opening experience was when an extreme white-nationalist friend of mine moved there for work. This is someone who unabashedly is pro-Nazi, talks about how much he admires Hitler, and the value of white ethnostates. So, yes, as an outright fascist he might not be the most representative of most, but I thought its an interesting ancedote.

    He contacted me the other day and was trying to tell me to move there. He was like “this place is wonderful, everything is beautiful, it actually feels happy in the atmosphere” and we talked about some of his beliefs; he concluded “diversity is horrible, but somehow they make it work. I would rather live here than my own country. Strange to say, I know, but truth.”

    That said, his country is Germany, so take that as you will. And I suppose that he’s arguably a fascist admiring a fascist-lite country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Zionist propagandist said:

    "For me, an eye-opening experience was when an extreme white-nationalist friend of mine moved there for work. This is someone who unabashedly is pro-Nazi, talks about how much he admires Hitler, and the value of white ethnostates. So, yes, as an outright fascist he might not be the most representative of most, but I thought its an interesting ancedote. "

    I seriously doubt if you even know the definition of "fascist".

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?
    http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg
    , @Astuteobservor II
    how could the people there not be happy about being rich? it just means your hitler admiring german friend likes people around him being happy :) more than he care about white supremacism.
  60. @Priss Factor
    "The authoritarian impulse arises when legitimate government can’t or won’t maintain order."

    That's not what is happening. The rising anger is about organicism. We are all organisms, and so we have organic drives and instincts. These instincts are for survival, defense, and self-preservation, but they can also be about aggression, invasion, and violence(as all organisms, and humans are animal-organisms too, violent by nature), which can cause much havoc.
    So, we created society and the state to take up the role of peace-maker and peace-enforcer.
    We leave it up to the state to maintain order by enacting and enforcing laws. That way, our organicist need for self-preservation and security is served by the apparatus of the state. That way, we can have state-sanctioned Rule of Law instead of the vigilante justice of humans-as-instinctual-animal-mobs or vendetta-justice of human-as-honor-bound-clan-members(like in Sicily). So, all states, even democratic ones, are by nature authoritarian. They have the power to enact and enforce laws, and we have to adhere to those laws.

    The problem of the current West is not lack of authority or authoritarianism. It is due to the problem of MISPLACED authority and authoritarianism. The problem is not that the state won't do its part to enact and enforce laws. The problem is the state is enforcing and enacting the WRONG kinds of laws against the wrong kinds of people.
    A state exists to protect its people(ethnos), territory, culture, and heritage from threats posed by foreigners and would-be-invaders. And Western nations used to do this. So, what changed? The Jewish globalists took over as elites. Jews are a minority in Western nations, and they are paranoid. They think the majority population of white goyim might rise up and come after them. Now, such fears were once understandable because there was overt hostility and even naked aggression against Jews in the past. But things have changed profoundly since the end of WWII. Attitudes have changed, and white people no longer hate Jews, and most white folks don't mind Jewish success. But Jews still have this deep-rooted fear and loathing of white majority power. So, Jews used their influence in the West to undermine all notions of white majority identity, interest, and power. And white cuck-collaborator elites(bought by Jewish money or mind-colonized by Jewish PC) go along with this arrangement.

    The result is PC, a form of authoritarianism that uses the power of law, media, and education to suppress anything associated with white identity, white pride, white territory, and white power. PC is authoritarian. It arrests people for saying the 'wrong' thing. In the UK, some guy was arrested for cracking a joke about Mandela on Twitter. In Germany, Merkel the hideous bitch has pushed laws that go after Germans who denounce Muslim 'refugees'. Swedish state goes after people who denounce immigration as a form of invasion and displacement. PC Swedes are secular-lutheran-puritans of 'social justice' that says whites are virtuous if and only if they cuck out to Jews, homos, and non-whites.
    So, the problem is not lack of authoritarianism but misplaced authoritarianism that favors aliens, minorities, and invaders than native folks. Jews want it this way. Because Jews are a minority elite in these nations, they want the state to favor the ideal of minority 'rights' and minority power than the identities/interests of native majorities. So, natives should have no special identity, no special history, and no special sense of territory. Earnest and naive do-goody Swedes have drunk this Jewish globo-Kool-aid more than any other people, and they are now saying Swedes have no history and no land to call their own. So, Sweden is to be open to all peoples. This craziness is enforced with authoritarianism in Sweden. All Swedes must consent to it .. or else.

    In the US, the problem is not lack of authoritarianism when it comes to black crime. The problem is too much PC authoritarianism on the issue of race. Elite power is employed to hunt down and destroy anyone who dares to question or counter the PC narrative. Charles Murray's views on race differences in IQ are mild stuff, but for them he was exiled from respectable community for a long time, and recently he was attacked by Middlebury PC Janissary.

    If there were no PC and if Americans could speak freely and honesty, we would have much better state of affairs since real problems would be addressed and worked on. It's like honest diagnosis of illness is necessary in order to come up with the right cure. If honesty is made taboo in medical diagnosis, the disease cannot be treated. Imagine if doctors are not allowed to call a cancer a cancer but must blame it on anything but cancer.

    On the issue of crime and racial violence, we would have a much better diagnosis of what is ailing the West if we could speak honestly. If honesty and truth replaced PC, people would sa, "It's blacks, not 'teens' and 'youths', who are going around bashing people. And blacks act like this because they are naturally stronger, more muscular, and more aggressive. So, they go around kicking non-white butt and cause all sorts of problems." That is so simple and so true.
    Some try to blame black violence on slavery, but does anyone really believe the US would have the same racial problems if it had brought over Chinese than Africans as slaves? Even as angry descendants of Chinese slaves, the little yellow guys wouldn't be scaring white folks half to death. It's like native of Mexico suffered a lot under the Spanish for many centuries, but most people don't fear Mexicans because most of them look like Guillermo.

    We need to speak the truth on race and racial problems. But PC authoritarianism ruthlessly destroys the reputation, career, and life of anyone who speaks honestly on the race issue. PC authoritarianism clamps down on truth, honesty, and candidness. It blunts Occam's Razor. PC is the switchblade of BS.

    So, the current rising anger is not about the Authoritarian Impulse but the Counter-Authoritarian Impulse. Honest people are getting sick of PC authoritarianism that favors the globalist elites, Jewish supremacists, black thugs, Muslim hordes, US military machine(that does the INVADE that leads to INVITE, something both Republicans and Democrats endorse), the white cucks who shill out to the GLOB, the reconquista Pepe Gonzalezes, Chinese sharks and Hindu weasels, homosexuals and trannies, and ghastly Negroes.

    The Counter-Authoritarian Impulse is anti-PC. It is against the Enforcement of Lies. It is against the Power of Propaganda that crushes the Truth that honest people can see with their own eyes. It is against the enforced suppression of white identity, white pride, white power, and white territoriality.

    Sure, some may feel that violence is necessary to bring about a new order, but most people who oppose PC want real freedom(especially from Negroes and excessive Diversity), not authoritarianism.
    We already have an autocratic/authoritarian political-social order that doesn't allow free speech. In the EU, free speech is illegal. In the US, free speech is effectively dead because anyone who dares to speak the truth will be destroyed politically or economically. Also, college professors have raised entire generations of thugs to attack and punch 'nazis'. The MSM didn't condemn the violence at Berkeley against Milo and at Middlebury against bald-headed Murray.

    The current PC authoritarianism is against the natural impulse of white racial organism. White human organisms want safety, security, and survival. At least those with healthy natural instincts do. Sadly, too many whites have had their minds colonized-and-infected by PC virus, and as such, they've been reprogrammed to identify with the Other than with the Self. It's like ants of one colony can be reprogrammed to serve another colony. It's like what the Turks did to Greek/Christian boys by turning them into Janissary.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuOzSWtxRw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzYM1VImKyM

    If there had been no PC authoritarianism, people would have spoken the truth and expressed their racial/national interests in the West. And then, the state would have been mindful of those truths & those sentiments and would have acted accordingly to enact and enforce the kinds of laws to maintain the security and survival of the native majority population.

    But the state was taken over by globalists who favored elite-minority-privilege-and-supremacism above all else. So, the state went from liberal-democratic-patriotic to authoritarian-PC-globalist. What is now called 'liberal democracy' is anything but. All of the West is ruled by globalist-oligarch-gang, and many of these people are Jewish who fear, loathe, and hate any notion of white gentile identity, pride, power, and territory. So, they push 'diversity' as a 'liberal democratic' value when, in fact, diversity makes democracy much less tenable since a diverse nation generally has people voting along racial/tribal lines.

    Worst of all, the globalists seek to totally shame and humiliate white men --- the warriors of the white race --- by turning white boys into pansy cucks who cheer on the colonization of white wombs by Negroes to hatch black babies. Womb Colonization is more destructive than Land Colonization. After all, even if a people's land is colonized by another people, the people can survive as a race, culture, and identity. But when the women of a race have their wombs colonized by the men of the invasive race, then they hatch children for the enemy men. (Spanish Conquistadors colonized the wombs of native women in the Americas, and the resulting Mestizo population has served the Empire than resist it.) Today, globalists use mass media to spread jungle fever to turn white boys into cucks and white women into muds whose wombs hatch black babies, the main enemy of the white race and of civilization in general. The white race is getting bullwhipped by globalism.

    Not all rage is authoritarian. The American Revolutionary Impulse against Britain was not authoritarian. It was for want of freedom and independence.
    And we are seeing the same kind of spirit rising among awakened whites who, unlike asleep hibernating ones, realize what's really at stake. They want liberation, independence, and freedom from PC tyranny. Some may hope for a strong leader to lead the way, but their ultimate goal is freedom and independence, not to live under a tyrant.

    As much as I occasionally enjoy reading your diarrhea, Prissy, your line of thought is too linear sometimes.

    1. If you brought Chinese as slaves, do you think Chinese in America will be some lanky, emaciated, bamboo stick walking around in CA? Think about 400 years of man-made selection.

    2. You think Blacks are always stronger? 400 years of strong slave selection has made your vision blurred every time you look at a black guy, I figured. Blacks are chasing black pygmies in Africa continent.

    3. There are millions of White slaves walking around us, if you trace back their ancestry. But their “White” skin affords them to be free of ethno-stereotypes. Irish slaves married lower class British nannies and over time, you have so-called genteel Whites. They walk around us, they breathe among us, but you can’t hide their slave mentality that was passed down over generations.

    A linear thinking is, you replace some variables in your equation, as in most equation tends to be linear, then you extrapolate what might be a causative agent in your solution.

    America is a melting pot, and I still believe it is still a melting pot. But the pot has to cool down. Otherwise, it will explode.

    Instead of linear thinking, this is how I see.

    1. To build a white majority country, you need a sufficient supply of Whites. Where do you get? Yes, all lower class, uneducated Whites migrating to a new world in a name of “Better lives and dreams” Look at Australia, all convicts sent to down under, but guess what, over time, you have a White majority country. It’s not so genteel, it’s just a very basal instinct of species cloaked in a genteel skin i.e., to spread White sperms (be it convicts or not), not ovaries.

    2. To work for your country, you need strong men. So you’d select strong black men. Who can stand under a brutal sunlight without wincing their eyes? So another selection came along.

    3. You brought Chinese slaves to build railroads along with Irish slaves. Building railroad was different from picking cottons. So another selection came along.

    Somewhere along the selection, America was infected with Jews virus. It becomes parasitic.

    Jewish women married any Whites, over time, you have White looking Jewish, who are nothing to do with Judiasm to begin with, but the idea of being Jewish allow them to have a blank check “holocaust”, and free from “slavery and racism” card.

    Jumping ahead, America now imports those desk-space enjoying species – Asians to work in an IT environment. Not because Asians are smart, but because 21st century needs those kinds of slaves.

    A constant supply of Africans who has nothing to do with past slavery, but they all become BLM in an instant once they landed on American soil. That is to keep down the White majority.

    All white immigrants become pornstars to cater to the need of those bald White men who can’t rely on White feminists, but have to settle down with those ugly looking Asian chicks.

    The melting pot indeed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "If you brought Chinese as slaves, do you think Chinese in America will be some lanky, emaciated, bamboo stick walking around in CA? Think about 400 years of man-made selection."

    Most Chinese for most Chinese history were not effete Confucian scholars. They toiled in the fields harder than blacks in America.
    Also, Mexican peasants were worked like slaves/serfs by Conquistadors.
    But both groups are not big and strong. Hard work doesn't necessarily make for tough people. After all, even a weakling can toil from sunrise to sunset in the fields. For strength, the weaker members must be weeded out, and the strongest ones must hog the women. (Mongols are stronger than Chinese cuz Mongol tough guy hogged the women who had his kids. So, other men had to invade and raid other people to get the ho's.)

    Also, the idea that blacks were bred to be strong in the US is false. Also, slavery lasted 200 yrs, and most slaves came later than at the beginning of slavery. So, if some black guy was brought as slave in 1760, it means slavery for him and his kids lasted only 100 yrs.

    No, it was 100,000 yrs of selective breeding in Africa that made the Negro strong. and the selective breeders were lions, hyenas, and hippos(and other beasks) that weeded out the slower and weaker Negroes. Blacks in Europe were not bred to be faster, but they dominate track. Blacks evolved that way in Africa.

    Here is reason why Negroes became fast. Pic says 1000 words.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLwVX7_sfXY

    And here is proof that blacks were made that way IN Africa. Notice that Nigerians arrive in the US with superior sports talent. They are built like gorillas. Like the Williams sisters.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/sports/more-nigerian-americans-are-reaching-highest-levels-of-sports.html?_r=0

    The west is bringing in a race that can kick white male butt, and that means white women will look down on white male as loser and offer hew womb to Negro to have black babies. Women go with the winner, and in our hormone-drenched society, white girls are encouraged to go jungle-ish by the entire culture, education, and even the church.

    Thus, white men will become 'Asianized'. In the West, Asian women reject Asian males as inferior losers and use Asian wombs to create white or black babies with non-asian men. That's how female psychology works.
    More blacks in the West means more 'Asianization' of the white male vis-a-vis the stronger negro.
    Without negroes in the west, this 'cuck' phenom would not exist.

    It's like in the movie SPECTACULAR NOW. Negro takes girl from white guy who settles for ugly girl.
    Worse, Hollywood and TV and sports and pop music are promoting the jungle-colonization of the white wombs to snuff out white babies and produce black babies.

    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in 'Latin America'.
  61. Elite authoritarians already in place: jooies are 2% of the population…..but the Trump cabinet is 50% jooie and 100% zio.

    Read More
  62. @Gene Su

    The system of extrajudicial punishment evolved as a response to federally-enforced equality for blacks and the consequent destabilization of Southern society.
     
    What I would seriously like to see happen is for blacks to start policing their own people. If a black Lee Kwan Yee or Rodrigo Duterte were to arise in sub-Saharan Africa, he might succeed at stomping out the senseless tribal violence and crime on the veldt. There are so many brutal black dictators in Africa. Why don't any of them attempt to bring law and order to their countries or tribes? Instead, all they do is look for ways to get welfare money from the West.

    I would also like to see blacks in America police their own neighborhoods. The last group to nearly succeed in suppressing crime were the black Muslims. If black watchmen were to patrol their own ghettos, they might be more effective than white policemen. Most especially, if black mobs were to unleash a gruesome retribution on every black thug who mugged a black person, raped a black girl, shot a black kid, and so on and so forth, crime would plummet.

    What I would seriously like to see happen is for blacks to start policing their own people. If a black Lee Kwan Yee or Rodrigo Duterte were to arise in sub-Saharan Africa, he might succeed at stomping out the senseless tribal violence and crime on the veldt. There are so many brutal black dictators in Africa. Why don’t any of them attempt to bring law and order to their countries or tribes? Instead, all they do is look for ways to get welfare money from the West.

    My Gosh, Eugene; I don’t even know where to start with this.

    1. There are police forces, as far as I’m aware in every one of the 39 countries in Africa.

    2. Leaders don’t “arise” anywhere. They are planted, or at least sanctioned by the US/Anglo/Euro Military Industrial Complex

    3. The reason that there is “senseless” violence and crime is that historical enemies, from thousands of years, have been forced together by Duh Man’s arbitrarily drawn borders. If I re-drew the borders of Europe tomorrow and forced Frogs and Krauts together and told them to self-govern, there’d be war within a month. See Belfast, and the Serb-Croat area for an example.

    4. There are so many “brutal black dictators” in Africa, because your government has come upon the very logical, and obvious maxim, that it is easier to deal with one puppet for 30 years than to have to make puppets of 100 people in a legislature, and one new one every 4 years. Please re-read #2.

    5. Why wouldn’t anyone want law and order in their country? This one is beyond me, but I’m guessing black people just like 13 year old child soldiers, the same way Brits like the royal family…boggles the mind!*

    6. There is no such thing as “welfare money”, except to Israel, or arguably Germany or Japan, where we spend so many billions subsidizing their defense. There are no military bases in S-S Africa, and every dollar spent is meant to make 10. Same with the charities, all fake, just meant to make the masonic cabal rich.

    Are you really a Chin, Gene? I have to start feeling you’re a white guy, the IQ doesn’t seem high enough.

    *This was sarcasm, I wouldn’t think I’d have to point it out, but….uh…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Truth,

    The reason that there is “senseless” violence and crime is that historical enemies, from thousands of years, have been forced together by Duh Man’s arbitrarily drawn borders.
     
    Very good point - see also Middle East for Exhibit B. For what it's worth, Africa simply was not the place of too many expansive empires and kingdoms. You can probably count the known ones on your hands and maybe a few toes (excluding the ones in North Africa). Maybe their people are just more into live and let live and good fences. As you point out, the nation-state is a European invention (and, importantly, a result of its historical roots with many, many kingdoms and empires and a unifying religion) and likely not suited for African people - and why should they want it if all it causes is trouble for how they organize societies?

    I always find this research on Somalia to be indicative:
    “Such was the case with Somalia’s government, which did more harm to its citizens than good. The government’s collapse and subsequent emergence of statelessness opened the opportunity for Somali progress. This paper investigates the impact of anarchy on Somali development. The data suggest that while the state of this development remains low, on nearly all of 18 key indicators that allow pre- and post-stateless welfare comparisons, Somalis are better off under anarchy than they were under government.”
    http://www.peterleeson.com/Better_Off_Stateless.pdf

    Note, the neighboring Oromo people's gadaa system which grew out of their clan organization - which is a native democratic system that has been operating fro around 500 years:
    "Although it is not known with any degree of certainty where and when the Gadaa system started, it is known and documented that the Oromo have been practicing it for well over 500 years. However, according to oral Oromo historians, the Gadaa system has been in practice for several centuries....Social scientists of diverse backgrounds at different times have studied the Gadaa system. Many of them have testified that it is uniquely democratic. Among those authorities, Plowden (1868), stated, 'among republican systems, Gadaa is superior.' Asmarom Legesse (1973) described the Gadaa system: 'one of the most astonishing and instructive turns the evolution of human society has taken.' Indeed, it is one of the most fascinating sociopolitical structure of Africa that even influenced the lives of other peoples. Several neighboring peoples have practiced a sort of the Gadaa. Among these are Sidama, Walayita, Konso, Darasa, Nyika, Nabdi, Maasai, etc., (Beckingham et al, 1954)."
    http://www.gadaa.com/culture.html

    Peace.
  63. Apr 11, 2017 Crosswalk Buttons, Voting Booths, and Other Illusions of Control

    Did you know that only 9% of crosswalks buttons in New York City actually do anything? Or that a piece of US government legislation disabled all elevator “close door” buttons in 1990? But these buttons are still there, and we still push them, even when we know that they do nothing. But why? And what does this tell us about the other illusions of control that the social engineers have placed before us?

    https://youtu.be/t5feLuwCYac

    Read More
  64. I believe that the trigger will be an economic collapse. The west is drowning in debt and the only thing keeping it afloat is massive money printing. This has always ended disastrously in the past.

    This will result in civil unrest, then civil war. There is no doubt in my mind that this war will fracture along racial lines.

    My best guess is that the White response will be to go almost entirely defensive. As we regroup, the freedom loving white men who built this country will take back our culture. We won’t be looking for authority figures.

    Read More
  65. @Rdm
    As much as I occasionally enjoy reading your diarrhea, Prissy, your line of thought is too linear sometimes.

    1. If you brought Chinese as slaves, do you think Chinese in America will be some lanky, emaciated, bamboo stick walking around in CA? Think about 400 years of man-made selection.

    2. You think Blacks are always stronger? 400 years of strong slave selection has made your vision blurred every time you look at a black guy, I figured. Blacks are chasing black pygmies in Africa continent.

    3. There are millions of White slaves walking around us, if you trace back their ancestry. But their “White” skin affords them to be free of ethno-stereotypes. Irish slaves married lower class British nannies and over time, you have so-called genteel Whites. They walk around us, they breathe among us, but you can’t hide their slave mentality that was passed down over generations.

    A linear thinking is, you replace some variables in your equation, as in most equation tends to be linear, then you extrapolate what might be a causative agent in your solution.

    America is a melting pot, and I still believe it is still a melting pot. But the pot has to cool down. Otherwise, it will explode.

    Instead of linear thinking, this is how I see.

    1. To build a white majority country, you need a sufficient supply of Whites. Where do you get? Yes, all lower class, uneducated Whites migrating to a new world in a name of “Better lives and dreams” Look at Australia, all convicts sent to down under, but guess what, over time, you have a White majority country. It’s not so genteel, it’s just a very basal instinct of species cloaked in a genteel skin i.e., to spread White sperms (be it convicts or not), not ovaries.

    2. To work for your country, you need strong men. So you’d select strong black men. Who can stand under a brutal sunlight without wincing their eyes? So another selection came along.

    3. You brought Chinese slaves to build railroads along with Irish slaves. Building railroad was different from picking cottons. So another selection came along.

    Somewhere along the selection, America was infected with Jews virus. It becomes parasitic.

    Jewish women married any Whites, over time, you have White looking Jewish, who are nothing to do with Judiasm to begin with, but the idea of being Jewish allow them to have a blank check "holocaust", and free from "slavery and racism" card.

    Jumping ahead, America now imports those desk-space enjoying species – Asians to work in an IT environment. Not because Asians are smart, but because 21st century needs those kinds of slaves.

    A constant supply of Africans who has nothing to do with past slavery, but they all become BLM in an instant once they landed on American soil. That is to keep down the White majority.

    All white immigrants become pornstars to cater to the need of those bald White men who can’t rely on White feminists, but have to settle down with those ugly looking Asian chicks.

    The melting pot indeed.

    “If you brought Chinese as slaves, do you think Chinese in America will be some lanky, emaciated, bamboo stick walking around in CA? Think about 400 years of man-made selection.”

    Most Chinese for most Chinese history were not effete Confucian scholars. They toiled in the fields harder than blacks in America.
    Also, Mexican peasants were worked like slaves/serfs by Conquistadors.
    But both groups are not big and strong. Hard work doesn’t necessarily make for tough people. After all, even a weakling can toil from sunrise to sunset in the fields. For strength, the weaker members must be weeded out, and the strongest ones must hog the women. (Mongols are stronger than Chinese cuz Mongol tough guy hogged the women who had his kids. So, other men had to invade and raid other people to get the ho’s.)

    Also, the idea that blacks were bred to be strong in the US is false. Also, slavery lasted 200 yrs, and most slaves came later than at the beginning of slavery. So, if some black guy was brought as slave in 1760, it means slavery for him and his kids lasted only 100 yrs.

    No, it was 100,000 yrs of selective breeding in Africa that made the Negro strong. and the selective breeders were lions, hyenas, and hippos(and other beasks) that weeded out the slower and weaker Negroes. Blacks in Europe were not bred to be faster, but they dominate track. Blacks evolved that way in Africa.

    Here is reason why Negroes became fast. Pic says 1000 words.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLwVX7_sfXY

    And here is proof that blacks were made that way IN Africa. Notice that Nigerians arrive in the US with superior sports talent. They are built like gorillas. Like the Williams sisters.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/sports/more-nigerian-americans-are-reaching-highest-levels-of-sports.html?_r=0

    The west is bringing in a race that can kick white male butt, and that means white women will look down on white male as loser and offer hew womb to Negro to have black babies. Women go with the winner, and in our hormone-drenched society, white girls are encouraged to go jungle-ish by the entire culture, education, and even the church.

    Thus, white men will become ‘Asianized’. In the West, Asian women reject Asian males as inferior losers and use Asian wombs to create white or black babies with non-asian men. That’s how female psychology works.
    More blacks in the West means more ‘Asianization’ of the white male vis-a-vis the stronger negro.
    Without negroes in the west, this ‘cuck’ phenom would not exist.

    It’s like in the movie SPECTACULAR NOW. Negro takes girl from white guy who settles for ugly girl.
    Worse, Hollywood and TV and sports and pop music are promoting the jungle-colonization of the white wombs to snuff out white babies and produce black babies.

    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in ‘Latin America’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh


    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in ‘Latin America’.
     
    Although I'm not sure what I think about the overall thesis, I applaud you for creating yet another meme'able phrase. Womb colonization is excellent and memorable.
    , @Negrolphin Pool
    The first half spot on imo. The second half is a portrait of a black swan, or at least a suspiciously swarthy one. Is there any evidence of increased miscegenation among Charles Murray's Belmont folks, for example? Maybe I should recuse myself for bias but while you focus on black toughness and honky-intimidation ability, animal strength doesn't equate to social dominance in most settings. Sure, it matters in some milieus, but blacks who try to emcee random social situations as often come across as churlish a**clowns and conspicuous embarrassments. Neil Degrasse Tyon is the exception that proves the 20-game-suspension-end-zone-dance rule. Those antics might register with nearby rutting bovids but not the hos a brotha be tryin to get at. It doesn't do much good outrunning hippos, after all, if they end up breaking your bed springs later.

    Truth is, it's not so hard to play Mr. Kurtz.

  66. @Truth

    What I would seriously like to see happen is for blacks to start policing their own people. If a black Lee Kwan Yee or Rodrigo Duterte were to arise in sub-Saharan Africa, he might succeed at stomping out the senseless tribal violence and crime on the veldt. There are so many brutal black dictators in Africa. Why don’t any of them attempt to bring law and order to their countries or tribes? Instead, all they do is look for ways to get welfare money from the West.
     
    My Gosh, Eugene; I don't even know where to start with this.

    1. There are police forces, as far as I'm aware in every one of the 39 countries in Africa.

    2. Leaders don't "arise" anywhere. They are planted, or at least sanctioned by the US/Anglo/Euro Military Industrial Complex

    3. The reason that there is "senseless" violence and crime is that historical enemies, from thousands of years, have been forced together by Duh Man's arbitrarily drawn borders. If I re-drew the borders of Europe tomorrow and forced Frogs and Krauts together and told them to self-govern, there'd be war within a month. See Belfast, and the Serb-Croat area for an example.

    4. There are so many "brutal black dictators" in Africa, because your government has come upon the very logical, and obvious maxim, that it is easier to deal with one puppet for 30 years than to have to make puppets of 100 people in a legislature, and one new one every 4 years. Please re-read #2.

    5. Why wouldn't anyone want law and order in their country? This one is beyond me, but I'm guessing black people just like 13 year old child soldiers, the same way Brits like the royal family...boggles the mind!*

    6. There is no such thing as "welfare money", except to Israel, or arguably Germany or Japan, where we spend so many billions subsidizing their defense. There are no military bases in S-S Africa, and every dollar spent is meant to make 10. Same with the charities, all fake, just meant to make the masonic cabal rich.

    Are you really a Chin, Gene? I have to start feeling you're a white guy, the IQ doesn't seem high enough.

    *This was sarcasm, I wouldn't think I'd have to point it out, but....uh...

    Hey Truth,

    The reason that there is “senseless” violence and crime is that historical enemies, from thousands of years, have been forced together by Duh Man’s arbitrarily drawn borders.

    Very good point – see also Middle East for Exhibit B. For what it’s worth, Africa simply was not the place of too many expansive empires and kingdoms. You can probably count the known ones on your hands and maybe a few toes (excluding the ones in North Africa). Maybe their people are just more into live and let live and good fences. As you point out, the nation-state is a European invention (and, importantly, a result of its historical roots with many, many kingdoms and empires and a unifying religion) and likely not suited for African people – and why should they want it if all it causes is trouble for how they organize societies?

    I always find this research on Somalia to be indicative:
    “Such was the case with Somalia’s government, which did more harm to its citizens than good. The government’s collapse and subsequent emergence of statelessness opened the opportunity for Somali progress. This paper investigates the impact of anarchy on Somali development. The data suggest that while the state of this development remains low, on nearly all of 18 key indicators that allow pre- and post-stateless welfare comparisons, Somalis are better off under anarchy than they were under government.”
    http://www.peterleeson.com/Better_Off_Stateless.pdf

    Note, the neighboring Oromo people’s gadaa system which grew out of their clan organization – which is a native democratic system that has been operating fro around 500 years:
    “Although it is not known with any degree of certainty where and when the Gadaa system started, it is known and documented that the Oromo have been practicing it for well over 500 years. However, according to oral Oromo historians, the Gadaa system has been in practice for several centuries….Social scientists of diverse backgrounds at different times have studied the Gadaa system. Many of them have testified that it is uniquely democratic. Among those authorities, Plowden (1868), stated, ‘among republican systems, Gadaa is superior.’ Asmarom Legesse (1973) described the Gadaa system: ‘one of the most astonishing and instructive turns the evolution of human society has taken.’ Indeed, it is one of the most fascinating sociopolitical structure of Africa that even influenced the lives of other peoples. Several neighboring peoples have practiced a sort of the Gadaa. Among these are Sidama, Walayita, Konso, Darasa, Nyika, Nabdi, Maasai, etc., (Beckingham et al, 1954).”
    http://www.gadaa.com/culture.html

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Napoleon said it best:

    "History is a group of lies agreed upon."
  67. @Priss Factor
    "If you brought Chinese as slaves, do you think Chinese in America will be some lanky, emaciated, bamboo stick walking around in CA? Think about 400 years of man-made selection."

    Most Chinese for most Chinese history were not effete Confucian scholars. They toiled in the fields harder than blacks in America.
    Also, Mexican peasants were worked like slaves/serfs by Conquistadors.
    But both groups are not big and strong. Hard work doesn't necessarily make for tough people. After all, even a weakling can toil from sunrise to sunset in the fields. For strength, the weaker members must be weeded out, and the strongest ones must hog the women. (Mongols are stronger than Chinese cuz Mongol tough guy hogged the women who had his kids. So, other men had to invade and raid other people to get the ho's.)

    Also, the idea that blacks were bred to be strong in the US is false. Also, slavery lasted 200 yrs, and most slaves came later than at the beginning of slavery. So, if some black guy was brought as slave in 1760, it means slavery for him and his kids lasted only 100 yrs.

    No, it was 100,000 yrs of selective breeding in Africa that made the Negro strong. and the selective breeders were lions, hyenas, and hippos(and other beasks) that weeded out the slower and weaker Negroes. Blacks in Europe were not bred to be faster, but they dominate track. Blacks evolved that way in Africa.

    Here is reason why Negroes became fast. Pic says 1000 words.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLwVX7_sfXY

    And here is proof that blacks were made that way IN Africa. Notice that Nigerians arrive in the US with superior sports talent. They are built like gorillas. Like the Williams sisters.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/sports/more-nigerian-americans-are-reaching-highest-levels-of-sports.html?_r=0

    The west is bringing in a race that can kick white male butt, and that means white women will look down on white male as loser and offer hew womb to Negro to have black babies. Women go with the winner, and in our hormone-drenched society, white girls are encouraged to go jungle-ish by the entire culture, education, and even the church.

    Thus, white men will become 'Asianized'. In the West, Asian women reject Asian males as inferior losers and use Asian wombs to create white or black babies with non-asian men. That's how female psychology works.
    More blacks in the West means more 'Asianization' of the white male vis-a-vis the stronger negro.
    Without negroes in the west, this 'cuck' phenom would not exist.

    It's like in the movie SPECTACULAR NOW. Negro takes girl from white guy who settles for ugly girl.
    Worse, Hollywood and TV and sports and pop music are promoting the jungle-colonization of the white wombs to snuff out white babies and produce black babies.

    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in 'Latin America'.

    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in ‘Latin America’.

    Although I’m not sure what I think about the overall thesis, I applaud you for creating yet another meme’able phrase. Womb colonization is excellent and memorable.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    A fight for survival - mortal 'womb'at!
    , @Priss Factor
    Wombperialism

    Womb-Raiders

    , @utu

    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in ‘Latin America’.
     
    This is more apt description of Portuguese than Spanish colonial policies, beliefs and ideology. Spaniard put more faith in conversion to Christianity (cultural domination) while Portuguese in spreading their genes and diluting the genes of the "savages."

    Portuguese case is one of the most complex and intriguing: if Brazil has been systematically praised as the example of the humanistic and miscegenating characteristic of Portuguese expansion, it has also been used as an argument for the legitimization of later colonialism in Africa, as well as for the construction of a self-representation of Portuguese as non-racists.
     

    In addition, by the early 20th century, Portugal was by far the European colonial power with the oldest territorial presence overseas; in some cases its territories had been continuously settled and ruled by the Portuguese throughout five centuries. Lusotropicalism celebrated both actual and mythological elements of racial democracy and civilizing mission in the Portuguese Empire, encompassing a pro-miscegenation attitude toward the colonies/overseas territories.
     
  68. @Daniel Chieh


    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in ‘Latin America’.
     
    Although I'm not sure what I think about the overall thesis, I applaud you for creating yet another meme'able phrase. Womb colonization is excellent and memorable.

    A fight for survival – mortal ‘womb’at!

    Read More
  69. When people feel threatened, scared, or pushed beyond forbearance, their behavior becomes visceral, violent, and unthinking. If conditions grow uglier, as it appears they must, it will be chaos or a man on a horse

    Or in the modern world those with the resources leave their shitty country and migrate to the life of a poor person in a rich country, which is incomparably better that the life of a rich person in a poor county. The poor countries will progressively lose their irreplaceable genetic seed corn, and spiral down into hell holes. Unstoppable and accelerating.

    Read More
  70. @Rurik
    I've quoted some of Fred's observations as snippets

    As a society crumbles, as bitter divisions grow and disorder spreads and nothing seems to work, anger comes and people begin to want a man who will say “Enough!” and slap down the malefactors–by any means necessary. A man who will make the trains run on time.

    government prevents both discussion and remedy, people begin to want someone in power who will forcibly end the detested behavior.

    The authoritarian impulse arises when legitimate government can’t or won’t maintain order. Which is beginning to look like now.

    As government imposes more and more restrictions on what people can think or do, on how they must live, government becomes just another enemy.

    This majority watches as mobs routinely storm podia and prevent politicians from speaking. They watch as rioters burn cities
     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X24e3N7ygi4

    Yet they cannot say so. They cannot say that looters and arsonist should be shot

    Those on Wall Street responsible for the subprime disaster should be summarily arrested and have their delicate asses immediately put, without recourse, into the general population of Leavenworth for ten years.

    That sounds radical and seditious, doesn’t it? It is both. But how many are thinking it?

    The anger is dangerous because it is not visible. The rigorous censorship we call “political correctness” prevents expression of ideas disliked by the ruling classes. It leads to surprises. It is why the Talking Heads were consistently, universally, and utterly wrong about Donald Trump’s chances of being elected. They continue to suffer from this cerebrocolonic congruence.

    The Authoritarian Impulse flourishes in times of Weimarian social chaos, in which America has dipped a great deal more than a tentative toe. Groups hate each other.

    A happy ending is hard to imagine. Racial antagonism seems unlikely to subside, and worsens.

    The culture coarsens, imitating the ghetto. Gun sales are way up, and there is a reason.

    It could blow. Such a thing would not be pretty and the consequences would be unpleasant. When people feel threatened, scared, or pushed beyond forbearance, their behavior becomes visceral, violent, and unthinking. If conditions grow uglier, as it appears they must, it will be chaos or a man on a horse. The Authoritarian Impulse.

     

    I think it paints a rather gloomy picture

    it's a redux of the exact same forces at war in Europe during WWII

    white Christian types (who want to live in nations run by and for white Christian types and their children) vs. Jews and blacks and Arabs and Asians and Muslims and Hispanics and everyone else, who *demand* that these white, Christian types hand over their nations and live as heavily taxed, humiliated and despised second class citizens at the pleasure of their new masters.

    That was the exact paradigm during the Weimar regime- that led to the 'man on a horse', and that is the *exact*, same paradigm facing white, Christian types today in virtually every single place where they live, whether it's their ancient homelands in Europe and Scandinavia, or the magnificent civilizations they've built in the new world. They are all expected to give them up and hand them over, and any who object are met with iron-fisted hysteria for their breach of universally and forcibly applied political correctness.

    I suspect, (as Fred ruminates) this does not bode well for the future.


    It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late,
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy -- willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the Saxon began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low.
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd.
    It was not taught by the state.
    No man spoke it aloud
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    It was not suddenly bred.
    It will not swiftly abate.
    Through the chilled years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the Saxon began to hate.


    ~ Kipling

    [just substitute 'Saxon' for Western man]

    Kipling wouldn’t have approved of substitution…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Kipling wouldn’t have approved of substitution…
     
    perhaps not, but Kipling's England was a very different one than exists today.

    I suspect he'd see the obvious- that the forces of evil that plague England are the very same forces of evil that plague Germany and France and Sweden and N. America and Syria and Iraq and Ukraine, etc..

    one of my favorite poems by Kipling was inspired by the loss of his son, condemned to die in the frozen trenches of a bullshit war imposed upon the young men of England by the corrupt elites

    it's as apropos today as the day it was written


    *


    "If any question why we died

    Tell them, because our fathers lied"


    *


    it applies to the British and the Americans and all NATO troops killing and dying in today's wars which are all based on devil's lies

    this British boy died in January in Iraq because his leaders told lies and happily sacrificed his young life to wallow in a few more shekels

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/03/20/3BD0D0F500000578-0-image-a-8_1483474895417.jpg

  71. @Ram
    Singapore can ACT as it DOES because it has sensible leadership. Remember that we used to vilify them as being communists. Today it is the most expensive City in the world.

    “Singapore can ACT as it DOES because it has sensible leadership.”

    You still do not get. Having a sensible leadership is a necessary condition but not sufficient to have effective policy on drugs. You must be allowed to implement right policies. And in the case of Singapore like in the case of Iceland and their action against the bankers they are permitted to do so because they are small and irrelevant. Their actions do not cut too much into the profits of drug mafia and banking industry.

    Read More
  72. @Daniel Chieh
    For me, an eye-opening experience was when an extreme white-nationalist friend of mine moved there for work. This is someone who unabashedly is pro-Nazi, talks about how much he admires Hitler, and the value of white ethnostates. So, yes, as an outright fascist he might not be the most representative of most, but I thought its an interesting ancedote.

    He contacted me the other day and was trying to tell me to move there. He was like "this place is wonderful, everything is beautiful, it actually feels happy in the atmosphere" and we talked about some of his beliefs; he concluded "diversity is horrible, but somehow they make it work. I would rather live here than my own country. Strange to say, I know, but truth."

    That said, his country is Germany, so take that as you will. And I suppose that he's arguably a fascist admiring a fascist-lite country.

    Zionist propagandist said:

    “For me, an eye-opening experience was when an extreme white-nationalist friend of mine moved there for work. This is someone who unabashedly is pro-Nazi, talks about how much he admires Hitler, and the value of white ethnostates. So, yes, as an outright fascist he might not be the most representative of most, but I thought its an interesting ancedote. ”

    I seriously doubt if you even know the definition of “fascist”.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1869?
    http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    You must enlighten us then with the definition of "fascist." Don't disappoint us now.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    Easy there, tiger. Literally all I meant by fascism was a highly structured society that affirmed the state over the individual.
  73. The system is already run by authoritarians, just the completely wrong kind. I’ve given up on America. The left has figured out how to get cultural Marxism through in America of all places with soft authoritarianism, non-white America will get economic Marxism through, all the while the “right” is busy serving self-interested Jews.

    Read More
  74. @Daniel Chieh
    For me, an eye-opening experience was when an extreme white-nationalist friend of mine moved there for work. This is someone who unabashedly is pro-Nazi, talks about how much he admires Hitler, and the value of white ethnostates. So, yes, as an outright fascist he might not be the most representative of most, but I thought its an interesting ancedote.

    He contacted me the other day and was trying to tell me to move there. He was like "this place is wonderful, everything is beautiful, it actually feels happy in the atmosphere" and we talked about some of his beliefs; he concluded "diversity is horrible, but somehow they make it work. I would rather live here than my own country. Strange to say, I know, but truth."

    That said, his country is Germany, so take that as you will. And I suppose that he's arguably a fascist admiring a fascist-lite country.

    how could the people there not be happy about being rich? it just means your hitler admiring german friend likes people around him being happy :) more than he care about white supremacism.

    Read More
  75. @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Kipling wouldn't have approved of substitution...

    Kipling wouldn’t have approved of substitution…

    perhaps not, but Kipling’s England was a very different one than exists today.

    I suspect he’d see the obvious- that the forces of evil that plague England are the very same forces of evil that plague Germany and France and Sweden and N. America and Syria and Iraq and Ukraine, etc..

    one of my favorite poems by Kipling was inspired by the loss of his son, condemned to die in the frozen trenches of a bullshit war imposed upon the young men of England by the corrupt elites

    it’s as apropos today as the day it was written

    *

    “If any question why we died

    Tell them, because our fathers lied”

    *

    it applies to the British and the Americans and all NATO troops killing and dying in today’s wars which are all based on devil’s lies

    this British boy died in January in Iraq because his leaders told lies and happily sacrificed his young life to wallow in a few more shekels

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/03/20/3BD0D0F500000578-0-image-a-8_1483474895417.jpg

    Read More
  76. @Daniel Chieh


    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in ‘Latin America’.
     
    Although I'm not sure what I think about the overall thesis, I applaud you for creating yet another meme'able phrase. Womb colonization is excellent and memorable.

    Wombperialism

    Womb-Raiders

    Read More
  77. @Stonehands
    You make your point- but I think that you are unintentionally accepting defeat in the culture wars-because you have "stuff". There will be no revolutionary advances in society if you are unwilling to lose it all. Anyhow, fortune favors the bold- and the masses will shuffle along behind whoever is winning..

    He doesn’t get that most of people’s wealth is based on a hyper inflated stock market and real estate bubble. In short it’s not real wealth, but speculative.

    If these current speculative bubbles ever collapse, you’ll see a lot of well off middle-class and upper middle-class types wealth vanish almost immediately. And you’ll see state pensioners get a hair cut with a chain saw. This will turn a lot of folks from being indifferent to willing to kill some SOB’s and blame the FedGov.

    And if the SNAP and EBT cards stop working, well it’s katie bar the door.

    This is why the elites went nuts in 2008 to try and keep the banking and stock markets from tanking after the real-estate bubble burst. Had the Fed and Congress not intervened, we’d have had a revolution.

    .

    Read More
  78. @Bragadocious
    I think Fred sits in his barcalounger on Lake Chapala and dreams about an America on fire. Maybe it makes him feel better about his decision to decamp to Mexico. Problem is, he doesn't understand this country anymore. For one thing, people may be angry about a lot of things, and one of those things is illegal immigration. But Fred has nothing to say about that, except that Mexicans are really really smart, probably smarter than we are -- and we should embrace 10 million squat monsters. (Like I said, he doesn't understand America)

    He also seems to think people are thisclose to picking up their AR-15s and storming the bastille. Not bloody likely. Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks. We have plenty to lose and will not overreact to absurd made for TV riots in Ferguson, Missouri. Let the coloreds kill each other, they have no souls anyway.

    Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks.

    I don’t think so. The median income is shockingly low:

    In 2014, half of working Americans reported an income at or below $28,851 (the median wage), and 51 percent reported an income of less than $30,000. Forty percent are making less than $20,000.

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/25/1-in-2-working-americans-make-less-than-30000-a-year/#ixzz4dyvudkW1

    Read More
  79. @Daniel Chieh


    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in ‘Latin America’.
     
    Although I'm not sure what I think about the overall thesis, I applaud you for creating yet another meme'able phrase. Womb colonization is excellent and memorable.

    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in ‘Latin America’.

    This is more apt description of Portuguese than Spanish colonial policies, beliefs and ideology. Spaniard put more faith in conversion to Christianity (cultural domination) while Portuguese in spreading their genes and diluting the genes of the “savages.”

    Portuguese case is one of the most complex and intriguing: if Brazil has been systematically praised as the example of the humanistic and miscegenating characteristic of Portuguese expansion, it has also been used as an argument for the legitimization of later colonialism in Africa, as well as for the construction of a self-representation of Portuguese as non-racists.

    In addition, by the early 20th century, Portugal was by far the European colonial power with the oldest territorial presence overseas; in some cases its territories had been continuously settled and ruled by the Portuguese throughout five centuries. Lusotropicalism celebrated both actual and mythological elements of racial democracy and civilizing mission in the Portuguese Empire, encompassing a pro-miscegenation attitude toward the colonies/overseas territories.

    Read More
  80. I also remember 1955, though only as a child. I don’t remember ever having a key to the house, although I suppose that the doors must have been locked sometime. After my mid-teens, I’ve seen nothing but the decline of decency and the increase of conflict, degeneracy, and perversion. There will surely not be a happy ending.

    Read More
  81. @Talha
    Hey Truth,

    The reason that there is “senseless” violence and crime is that historical enemies, from thousands of years, have been forced together by Duh Man’s arbitrarily drawn borders.
     
    Very good point - see also Middle East for Exhibit B. For what it's worth, Africa simply was not the place of too many expansive empires and kingdoms. You can probably count the known ones on your hands and maybe a few toes (excluding the ones in North Africa). Maybe their people are just more into live and let live and good fences. As you point out, the nation-state is a European invention (and, importantly, a result of its historical roots with many, many kingdoms and empires and a unifying religion) and likely not suited for African people - and why should they want it if all it causes is trouble for how they organize societies?

    I always find this research on Somalia to be indicative:
    “Such was the case with Somalia’s government, which did more harm to its citizens than good. The government’s collapse and subsequent emergence of statelessness opened the opportunity for Somali progress. This paper investigates the impact of anarchy on Somali development. The data suggest that while the state of this development remains low, on nearly all of 18 key indicators that allow pre- and post-stateless welfare comparisons, Somalis are better off under anarchy than they were under government.”
    http://www.peterleeson.com/Better_Off_Stateless.pdf

    Note, the neighboring Oromo people's gadaa system which grew out of their clan organization - which is a native democratic system that has been operating fro around 500 years:
    "Although it is not known with any degree of certainty where and when the Gadaa system started, it is known and documented that the Oromo have been practicing it for well over 500 years. However, according to oral Oromo historians, the Gadaa system has been in practice for several centuries....Social scientists of diverse backgrounds at different times have studied the Gadaa system. Many of them have testified that it is uniquely democratic. Among those authorities, Plowden (1868), stated, 'among republican systems, Gadaa is superior.' Asmarom Legesse (1973) described the Gadaa system: 'one of the most astonishing and instructive turns the evolution of human society has taken.' Indeed, it is one of the most fascinating sociopolitical structure of Africa that even influenced the lives of other peoples. Several neighboring peoples have practiced a sort of the Gadaa. Among these are Sidama, Walayita, Konso, Darasa, Nyika, Nabdi, Maasai, etc., (Beckingham et al, 1954)."
    http://www.gadaa.com/culture.html

    Peace.

    Napoleon said it best:

    “History is a group of lies agreed upon.”

    Read More
  82. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Wally
    Zionist propagandist said:

    "For me, an eye-opening experience was when an extreme white-nationalist friend of mine moved there for work. This is someone who unabashedly is pro-Nazi, talks about how much he admires Hitler, and the value of white ethnostates. So, yes, as an outright fascist he might not be the most representative of most, but I thought its an interesting ancedote. "

    I seriously doubt if you even know the definition of "fascist".

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?
    http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg

    You must enlighten us then with the definition of “fascist.” Don’t disappoint us now.

    Read More
  83. @Abelard Lindsey
    As Fred states here, the root of the problem is not the problems themselves, but the fact that we are not allowed to talk openly about the problems around us. We are forced to accept certain limitations on the range of what we can openly discuss about the causes of these issues. This prevents a political solution to our various problems, thus necessitating non-political solutions to such.

    Not only are we not allowed to discuss the conditions that we find ourselves in if we wish to retain a position in polite sociwty, but both parties are fully committed to globalism/multiculturalism. There is no traditional political venue in which to challenge globalism/multiculturalism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @edNels
    That's why we had ''countries'' and ''states''and ''counties'', Watch out for the ugly ones at the store.. Them's the ones; 0r even it could be somebody at alanon...don't count them out...!
  84. @Bragadocious
    What I meant is most Americans have some combination of those things. We know around 2/3 of Americans live in an owner-occupied home. These are not people who will start a revolution over some monkeyshines in a Ferguson, MO convenience store. Fred's nuts, or he's just trolling. That was my point.

    What I meant is most Americans have some combination of those things. We know around 2/3 of Americans live in an owner-occupied home. These are not people who will start a revolution over some monkeyshines in a Ferguson, MO convenience store. Fred’s nuts, or he’s just trolling. That was my point.

    You’re missing Fred’s point entirely. Of course the Americans who have two cars and a summer home and a boat aren’t going to “start a revolution.” They’re the ones who will demand that an authoritarian figure will put an end to the revolution that the left-wing rabble and their Negro pawns will start.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
    In fairness, I think he means that the ascendance of an autocrat would necessarily entail a revolution of some kind. Such powers aren't prescribed, indeed they're proscribed, by the constitution.
  85. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    I am a Canadian. When I was young my country was almost 99% white. You almost never saw anybody who wasn’t white. Now I walk around Toronto and feel like a foreigner in my own country. I am certainly angry about this but nobody seems to care.

    Read More
  86. @Bragadocious
    I think Fred sits in his barcalounger on Lake Chapala and dreams about an America on fire. Maybe it makes him feel better about his decision to decamp to Mexico. Problem is, he doesn't understand this country anymore. For one thing, people may be angry about a lot of things, and one of those things is illegal immigration. But Fred has nothing to say about that, except that Mexicans are really really smart, probably smarter than we are -- and we should embrace 10 million squat monsters. (Like I said, he doesn't understand America)

    He also seems to think people are thisclose to picking up their AR-15s and storming the bastille. Not bloody likely. Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks. We have plenty to lose and will not overreact to absurd made for TV riots in Ferguson, Missouri. Let the coloreds kill each other, they have no souls anyway.

    He also seems to think people are thisclose to picking up their AR-15s and storming the bastille. Not bloody likely. Most of us have homes, second homes, 2 cars, stock portolios and 401ks. We have plenty to lose

    You’re quite correct on that point. The chances of the kind of explosion Fred seems to be expecting are close to zero. People in the modern West are not going to risk their material comforts. No matter how bad things get they will just put up with it.

    Read More
  87. @MBlanc46
    Not only are we not allowed to discuss the conditions that we find ourselves in if we wish to retain a position in polite sociwty, but both parties are fully committed to globalism/multiculturalism. There is no traditional political venue in which to challenge globalism/multiculturalism.

    That’s why we had ”countries” and ”states”and ”counties”, Watch out for the ugly ones at the store.. Them’s the ones; 0r even it could be somebody at alanon…don’t count them out…!

    Read More
  88. @Priss Factor
    "If you brought Chinese as slaves, do you think Chinese in America will be some lanky, emaciated, bamboo stick walking around in CA? Think about 400 years of man-made selection."

    Most Chinese for most Chinese history were not effete Confucian scholars. They toiled in the fields harder than blacks in America.
    Also, Mexican peasants were worked like slaves/serfs by Conquistadors.
    But both groups are not big and strong. Hard work doesn't necessarily make for tough people. After all, even a weakling can toil from sunrise to sunset in the fields. For strength, the weaker members must be weeded out, and the strongest ones must hog the women. (Mongols are stronger than Chinese cuz Mongol tough guy hogged the women who had his kids. So, other men had to invade and raid other people to get the ho's.)

    Also, the idea that blacks were bred to be strong in the US is false. Also, slavery lasted 200 yrs, and most slaves came later than at the beginning of slavery. So, if some black guy was brought as slave in 1760, it means slavery for him and his kids lasted only 100 yrs.

    No, it was 100,000 yrs of selective breeding in Africa that made the Negro strong. and the selective breeders were lions, hyenas, and hippos(and other beasks) that weeded out the slower and weaker Negroes. Blacks in Europe were not bred to be faster, but they dominate track. Blacks evolved that way in Africa.

    Here is reason why Negroes became fast. Pic says 1000 words.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLwVX7_sfXY

    And here is proof that blacks were made that way IN Africa. Notice that Nigerians arrive in the US with superior sports talent. They are built like gorillas. Like the Williams sisters.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/sports/more-nigerian-americans-are-reaching-highest-levels-of-sports.html?_r=0

    The west is bringing in a race that can kick white male butt, and that means white women will look down on white male as loser and offer hew womb to Negro to have black babies. Women go with the winner, and in our hormone-drenched society, white girls are encouraged to go jungle-ish by the entire culture, education, and even the church.

    Thus, white men will become 'Asianized'. In the West, Asian women reject Asian males as inferior losers and use Asian wombs to create white or black babies with non-asian men. That's how female psychology works.
    More blacks in the West means more 'Asianization' of the white male vis-a-vis the stronger negro.
    Without negroes in the west, this 'cuck' phenom would not exist.

    It's like in the movie SPECTACULAR NOW. Negro takes girl from white guy who settles for ugly girl.
    Worse, Hollywood and TV and sports and pop music are promoting the jungle-colonization of the white wombs to snuff out white babies and produce black babies.

    It is Womb Colonization, like what the Spanish invaders did to indigenous wombs in 'Latin America'.

    The first half spot on imo. The second half is a portrait of a black swan, or at least a suspiciously swarthy one. Is there any evidence of increased miscegenation among Charles Murray’s Belmont folks, for example? Maybe I should recuse myself for bias but while you focus on black toughness and honky-intimidation ability, animal strength doesn’t equate to social dominance in most settings. Sure, it matters in some milieus, but blacks who try to emcee random social situations as often come across as churlish a**clowns and conspicuous embarrassments. Neil Degrasse Tyon is the exception that proves the 20-game-suspension-end-zone-dance rule. Those antics might register with nearby rutting bovids but not the hos a brotha be tryin to get at. It doesn’t do much good outrunning hippos, after all, if they end up breaking your bed springs later.

    Truth is, it’s not so hard to play Mr. Kurtz.

    Read More
  89. @Dr. X

    What I meant is most Americans have some combination of those things. We know around 2/3 of Americans live in an owner-occupied home. These are not people who will start a revolution over some monkeyshines in a Ferguson, MO convenience store. Fred’s nuts, or he’s just trolling. That was my point.
     
    You're missing Fred's point entirely. Of course the Americans who have two cars and a summer home and a boat aren't going to "start a revolution." They're the ones who will demand that an authoritarian figure will put an end to the revolution that the left-wing rabble and their Negro pawns will start.

    In fairness, I think he means that the ascendance of an autocrat would necessarily entail a revolution of some kind. Such powers aren’t prescribed, indeed they’re proscribed, by the constitution.

    Read More
  90. “Those on Wall Street responsible for the subprime disaster should be summarily arrested and have their delicate asses immediately put, without recourse, into the general population of Leavenworth for ten years.”

    You bet. Madoff was just the patsy for hundreds of worse.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    Yes, definitely! Remember how taxpayers were being fucked over by obama as he bailed out the "too big to fail" companies which then continued to pay huge bonuses to the executives of those failed companies? Yes, I think giving their ass to big black bubba is a fine and well deserved punishment just before they are hanged or guillotined.
  91. @Wally
    Zionist propagandist said:

    "For me, an eye-opening experience was when an extreme white-nationalist friend of mine moved there for work. This is someone who unabashedly is pro-Nazi, talks about how much he admires Hitler, and the value of white ethnostates. So, yes, as an outright fascist he might not be the most representative of most, but I thought its an interesting ancedote. "

    I seriously doubt if you even know the definition of "fascist".

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?
    http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg

    Easy there, tiger. Literally all I meant by fascism was a highly structured society that affirmed the state over the individual.

    Read More
  92. @The Real John Jeremiah Smith

    What you’re describing sounds more like a lynching impulse, than the authoritarian one. You need to calm down a bit.
     
    I've read a few of your comments. You're an idiot. Why do you read any of Reed at all? You are stupid like a bag of broccoli.

    A "lynching" is carried out by a group of angry citizens. "Authoritarian" actions are taken by government. Perhaps idiots are confused about the difference.

    Got that? Now, stop it. Just stop it.

    Actually Mao was correct, and you are not.

    Read More
  93. @Fran Macadam
    "Those on Wall Street responsible for the subprime disaster should be summarily arrested and have their delicate asses immediately put, without recourse, into the general population of Leavenworth for ten years."

    You bet. Madoff was just the patsy for hundreds of worse.

    Yes, definitely! Remember how taxpayers were being fucked over by obama as he bailed out the “too big to fail” companies which then continued to pay huge bonuses to the executives of those failed companies? Yes, I think giving their ass to big black bubba is a fine and well deserved punishment just before they are hanged or guillotined.

    Read More
  94. @TheBoom
    The reason we are no longer that homogenous 1950's world is to help pave the way for authoritarianism run by the globalists and deep state with probably a leftist veneer.

    True. So when the revolution does come we need to kill as many of the globalists and leftists/fascists as possible. The only way to win is through complete decapitation of the leadership/intelligentsia. Even the ones that get away.

    Read More
  95. @utu
    Singapore can afford policy that eliminates drugs and Iceland can afford policy that penalizes bankers because they are small and peripheral. Larger countries will never be allowed to do the same because they are big lucrative markets for drug mafias and banking mafias.

    You have a point, but to call Singapore ‘peripheral’ without qualification jars on me.

    They may have branched out now, but the basis of the economic status they inherited from the British Empire was Raffles’ choice of a perfect site for a *pivotal* (hardly peripheral) trading port.

    They also have a large diplomatic weight for their size, not just in ASEAN.

    Fred’s quote of the notice ”There is a death penalty in Singapore for possession in [sic:of] drugs. This penalty is enforced.” is almost verbatim.

    However, I am reliably informed that the top techno-music clubs were awash in ecstasy, partaken in by brats of party leaders and the upper and upper-middle classes, plus expats.

    I am not sure of the situation now, guess it is still similar.

    Singapore sticks to this policy more out of the same kind of mentality that makes itself, Korea and Japan determined to *not* accept hordes of psychopathic invaders (‘refugees’) from the UNHCR.

    The other factor in that, of course, is the self-racism of white western SJWs, and that the non-white ‘western’ SJWs from recent immigrant backgrounds only care about SJ insofar as it is inimical to their hosts (as in of parasites).

    As many pointed out, if that Banglashi careerist and hypocrite (BLACK LIVES MATTER x 100) cared about anything other than toadying, he would have an interest in the real abuses in Bangladesh and just about all OIC states.

    I would bet a fortune that he doesn’t ”check his privilege’ on visits home, hell, he sure doesn’t bother doing so in the USA.

    Point of interest re. S’pores drug policies:on independence, first as part of, then from, the Malayan Federation, they had a second-hand legacy from the Opium Wars and the particular affinity of many Chinese people for opium. There were very many addicts and dens. That is the historical root of their policies.

    Read More
  96. @Ram
    Singapore can ACT as it DOES because it has sensible leadership. Remember that we used to vilify them as being communists. Today it is the most expensive City in the world.

    Well, Ram, you make a strong case for biggest ignoramus on the thread with your assertion:

    Remember that we used to vilify them as being communists.

    Although not part of ‘we’, only a sympathiser with some, I don’t remember that. Nobody else here would, either. Perhaps you come from one of those parallel dimensions or a special hopital?

    Please don’t say anything when you know nothing. There was never even a communist state with a similar name.

    Singapore is a one-party state, and the ever-ruling People’s Action Party *was* a member of the Socialist International. They were kicked out a very long time ago.

    The party’s original logo was based on the logo of the British Union of Fascists. The polity is fascist in the politico-social-economic sense (as opposed to the name-calling nonsense). The Singaporean variant is ‘shopping fascism’.

    A communist insurrection was very active in the late ’50s and early ’60s, but it was blocked by sending willing activists and leaders to China, and locking up (along with people in the same roles from other socialist parties) the rest.

    Read More
  97. @woodNfish
    True. So when the revolution does come we need to kill as many of the globalists and leftists/fascists as possible. The only way to win is through complete decapitation of the leadership/intelligentsia. Even the ones that get away.

    Count me in!

    Read More
  98. Nice title, “The Authoritarian Impulse”, a book pushed by the Jews to criminalize White thought.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Fred Reed Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Not What Tom Jefferson Had in Mind
Sounds Like A Low-Ranked American University To Me
Very Long, Will Bore Hell Out Of Most People, But I Felt Like Doing It
It's Not A Job. It's An Adventure.
Cloudy, With Possible Tidal Wave