The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Fred Reed ArchiveBlogview
Questions for Black Lives Matter: The Case for Separation
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

In reading the endless complaints by blacks about shootings by the police, I usually find it hard to know what really happened. As far as I am aware, the media never allow an unedited interview, or any interview, with the police charged with the shootings but allow endless commentary by people who weren’t there.

I am also often puzzled by the motivation of the cops. Do they confer in the morning and say, “Hey, let’s shoot some totally innocent black guy in front of witnesses who probably have cell phones?” And why are cops not brutalizing Latinos, only blacks, especially in LA, which provides a target-rich environment?

If I could, I would speak to BLM as follows:

I cannot determine what you want. There seems to be a great deal of anger but little clarity. Discussion usually wanders off into demands for justice, but without specifics.

Since I am looking for practical recommendations, let us begin by acknowledging the circumstances we face. You say that white cops mistreat blacks, sometimes brutally. This is true. I have seen some of it, and know of more. White cops seldom like blacks, nor blacks, white cops. The cultures are irreconcilably different. On the other hand, beatings of whites, Latinos, and Asians by gangs of blacks are far outnumber beatings of blacks by white cops. In sum, no love is lost and I do not see a lot of moral high ground. So:

Do you want white policemen excluded from black neighborhoods?

The available answers are “yes,” and “no.” I do not mean to be abrupt about this, but vague considerations of abstract justice, alleged discrimination, and racism do not provide usable answers. So, do you want white cops pulled from black neighborhoods, or not? It’s one or the other.

Personally I think it wiser not to have whites policing blacks. I don’t want to see white cops raped in media circuses. Nor do I want blacks to be mistreated by white cops. It seems to me that BLM should support segregation of police as it would eliminate any possibility of racist behavior. But, again, I will accept whatever choice you make.

Two New Jersey Teens Arrested for Brutal Knockout Attack on Elderly Man in Paterson

Do you want any policemen in your neighborhoods?

Here again a clear answer is needed. I have no stake in the question and do not want to impose my standards on you. Yet a concrete policy must be either no police, or police of some kind. Which?

If you asked my advice, I would suggest that without police your neighborhoods would turn into free-fire zones. Note that after Ferguson police have in large part stopped policing, so you can get a minor idea of what a police-less society will be like. However, your neighborhoods are your neighborhoods. I will respect your decision.

Do blacks want to recruit, train, and discipline police forces of blacks only in their neighborhoods?

ORDER IT NOW

Again, your choice. I do not presume to prescribe for you. However, it would eliminate complaints of racism. Should this plan be adopted, black forces would receive the same funding as white, the same pensions and benefits, so there would be no question of discrimination. They would better understand a black population. But do as you like. Just tell me, specifically, what it is that you want.

‘Black Lives Matter’ Thugs Who Beat Marine Unconscious in Race Attack WON’T Face Hate Crime Charges

What laws do you want cops to enforce in your neighborhoods?

Specifically what laws? Do you want the police to arrest crack dealers? Yes, or no. Again, I don’t care, and do not tell you what to do.

Yet cops need to know what they are expected to do. Should they stop people drinking in public, or allow it? Dealing drugs? Illegal parking? Public urination? Looting? Prostitution? I don’t care. Make any decision you like, but tell the cops clearly, and do not penalize them for doing what you tell them to do.

As a multiculturalist, I believe that different ethnic and racial groups should, within their neighborhoods, live by their own norms. That includes my neighborhood and my norms. For example, in my neighborhood I would want the police to shoot looters and arsonists. Perhaps this is a white thing, but I am a white guy and I am talking about white neighborhoods and white notions of civilization.

RacialMurder

Breitbart: “Three Young Black Women Accused of Beating 51-Year-Old White Man to Death” Hundreds of documented cases exist, carefully ignored by the media and the government. If you ignore a lump, it will go away. Ask any oncologist.

What should cops do when a criminal resists arrest?

This is an important question, in fact the important question. Nearly all of the complaints of shootings and beatings have involved resistance to arrest. It becomes explosive when white cops are involved. Here we need a clear answer. A cop cannot obey a vague abstraction.

Let us suppose that in a black neighborhood a cop sees a wanted drug dealer, rapist, killer, or burglar. He says, “You are under arrest,” and the rapist or wanted armed robber or coke dealer says, “Fuck off, white boy.”

What does BLM want the cop to do? Nothing? Something? What? Specifically, what? This is not a philosophical question. A cop in an actual situation has to do something, or nothing. I don’t care which. You tell me, and I will support your decision. But the cop has to know what is expected of him.

For a white cop, the best answer is “nothing.” Anything he does risks a brutality beef: Physically tackling a criminal, tasing him, pepper-spraying him, clubbing him, or shooting him all pose the risk of prosecution, lawsuits, and loss of career. There is no pretty way to subdue a strong male who doesn’t want to be subdued. A wanted killer is looking at a lot of time in slam and will be perfectly willing to hurt a cop to avoid being arrested.

What do you want the cop to do? Specifically what?

What does BLM want black cops to do?

This is your business, not mine, but you might think about it from the cop’s point of view. How should a black cop respond to resistance?

Other questions merit consideration. If you have ever walked beats with cops, which virtually no one has, you know that a cop faces ambiguities, murky regions of the law, and sometimes problems that cannot be resolved within the law.

For example, suppose that a drug crew is selling on the sidewalk in front of an old woman’s house, and she is afraid to go out for groceries. This is not hypothetical: I have seen it. What should the cop do?

ORDER IT NOW

Legally, he can do nothing. The sidewalk is public, certainly if they keep moving. They will not be selling openly, so he can’t arrest them. He can tell them to move on, and they may. The minute he is out of sight, they are back. What if they say, “It’s a free country”? Now what? The little old lady needs to eat.

What do you suggest? If it is your old woman in your neighborhood, it is your business, but the cop needs to know.

In sum, if you will say what concrete and specific things you want, we can discuss your desires rationally and perhaps come to a resolution. Some problems will inevitably remain, such as what to do in mixed neighborhoods. My take is that the quickest and easiest means of limiting friction is simply to separate white cops and black people, and black cops and white people, but this, if you agree that it is a good idea, cannot happen unless groups like BLM ask for it.

(Republished from Fred on Everything by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Black Crime, Black Lives Matter, Blacks 
    []
  1. I suspect the answer from the BLM people to each of your questions will be:

    YOU ARE A RACIST!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Well just remember if you enter a white neighborhood you are agreeing to be policed by white policeman and white standard of behavior. Don't like it? Stay in your own part of town.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /freed/questions-for-black-lives-matter-the-case-for-separation/#comment-1409917
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. anon says: • Disclaimer

    Separate but equal.

    Read More
  3. Rich says:

    All they want is to cry, whine and destroy. The majority of Blacks don’t care about the victims of crime, they just care about jumping up and down and getting free stuff when the looting starts. I’ve never seen a demonstration anywhere in the world where Black people have sided with law and order. Everyone knows it, but most scared Whites are afraid to admit it, even to themselves. I have a feeling that when Hilary opens the border and legalizes the illegals, Blacks won’t get away with the games they’ve been playing all these years. I don’t think a majority Hispanic USA is going to have much use for them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stephen R. Diamond
    Who cares about your "opinion"? You're already on record as having given up.
  4. pyrrhus says:
    @anon
    Separate but equal.

    Things won’t be equal for long…

    Read More
    • Replies: @pink_point
    what about "for as long as the human kind exists"? :)
  5. Jefferson says:

    When I watch The Purge films, I automatically think of Black Lies Matter.

    Read More
  6. Realist says:

    Black lives don’t matter to other blacks….they slaughter each other relentlessly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "Black lives don’t matter to other blacks….they slaughter each other relentlessly."

    Black lives only matter to Blacks when racial outsiders like Whites kill one of their tribesmen.

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.
  7. Good piece by Fred. Separate societies is clearly the best solution, but, as John Derbyshire as observed, that’s will be the equivalent of putting Ghana next to Switzerland. Blacks realize at some level that they are dependent on whites to maintain things–dependent yet resentful, they remain perpetual adolescents.

    Read More
  8. Jefferson says:
    @Realist
    Black lives don't matter to other blacks....they slaughter each other relentlessly.

    “Black lives don’t matter to other blacks….they slaughter each other relentlessly.”

    Black lives only matter to Blacks when racial outsiders like Whites kill one of their tribesmen.

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Erik Sieven
    this in-group out-group thinking is probably evolutionary useful. Inter-group violence has the potential to become an existential thread, while I have never heard of a people who disappeared because of intra-group, criminal violence.
    , @Realist
    Yes, right you are.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are correct. This is one of the few (only?) areas where blacks have a better understanding of the world than whites.

    Me against my brother, etc., etc. Whites have been on top for so long, we've begun to think that our "shit don't stink." We'd better learn that, like everyone else on the planet, we need to fight piece of paradise or someone will - indeed, should - take it from us.

    We'll see.
    , @Patrick DeBoard
    That seems true. In like manner, they call each other nigger, yet will not allow a white person to even use the word in a sentence. Weird shit.
    , @Jim Christian

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.
     
    Or 10,000, or 20,000 or, or, or. Since MLK, 1 million B-on-B murders? Some "brotherhood" they have. And still, if it was that many B-on-W murders, Whites of today would be demanding "tolerance". Of course, those of us capable of and willing to shoot back would have solved that particular ratio long ago. Instead, we move further away, build new cities and civilizations, known as the Suburbs.
  9. I’d like to see the points raised in this article answered by BLM, but as commented previously, it would only be met with accusations of racism. And it would only serve to be a pointless exercise anyway, there’s never any solutions or answers with these people, only problems. And it’s always whitey that’s the problem.

    Read More
  10. I’m a working class white guy living in a majority black city in the deep south. I know a lot of black people who work for a living and are not criminals. They don’t like the gang bangers any more than I do. They are the victims of black on black crime. I live in a mixed neighborhood which is less dangerous than the all black neighborhoods. Still, the swat teams here manage to break into the wrong address and shoot the wrong people. The police are the only thing keeping the gangs of thugs down. But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.

    Black Lives Matter is funded, I am told, by Mr. Soros. What I would tell BLM is they are being used to exacerbate racial strife in America. Keeping black and white at each others throats is public policy. What I would tell comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer, is that police brutality and criminality are real. That the war on drugs with its vast gulag of jails and prisons is real.

    We all have a common enemy. The Police State and the scumbags who own it. We will have neither liberty nor peace and prosperity until we unite against our oppressors. Not BLM. Not Mexicans. Not queers or feminists or cry babies on campus. Not white racists or red necks. But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    Read More
    • Agree: Bill Jones
    • Replies: @Marty
    "comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer ..."

    You're an idiot. Lawyer fees will bankrupt anyone merely "middle class." Did you somehow miss last week's much ballyhooed news that most peeople can't come up with $400 for an emergency? Also, you may be the only guy on Unz who never read "The Bonfire of the Vanities." Ever heard of the phrase Great White Defendant? Cops need white arrestees to balance the racial books. It's just that being middle class means not doing street crime, whereas in blackife middle class = Not Keeping it Real.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    "But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs."

    No. Both black and white people have ample reason to fear . . . young black men. Blacks are 13% of the population but commit 50% of the murders. Blacks commit violent crime at seven times the rate of whites.

    Black are incapable AS A GROUP to maintain anything close to a civilization. Yes, there are a fair number of reasonable blacks. But there aren't enough. On their own, blacks descend into near anarchy.

    Yes, the 0.01% are trying to screw us over. However, that doesn't mean that we need to tie arms with our black brothers. You can hate the 0.01% and understand that blacks can't as a group function.
    , @dcite
    I couldn't afford a lawyer. Most whites I know would dread having to pay a lawyer because it might bankrupt them, just like the medical fees the illegals get for free. I work with someone who talked abut her relative getting emergency care in the hospital and then was not able to pay, so the debt was "forgiven." That doesn't happen for native whites. Probably doesn't happen for native anybody. But it does happen for non-natives who are here to make money on us, even if they are well intentioned. I had been complaining to my colleague about the possibility of back breaking medical debt when she told that story; I didn't want to say that that wouldn't work for a native white.
    , @Lurker

    But those who oppress us all. The .01%.
     
    Anti-semite!
    , @KenH
    If the police or the police state machinery is used against whites blacks don't care like you care about them. They even cheer and celebrate it. The black sweetie pies you speak of also voted for Hussein Obama at 95%. Don't ever think you have allies in the black race as most utterly loathe all non-blacks and especially white people.
    , @Eustace Tilley (not)


    Fellow Proletarian Intellectual:

    I am deeply touched by your love for Man. Going by your nom de plume, you are a sincere leftist who wants to get along with his multi-hued and -gendered brothers and sisters in the Paradise to Come when the proletariat has finally liquidated the Tres Haute Bourgeoisie.

    But here's the problem: The feminists are supporters of Hillary, who is the whore of the .01%. The homosexual transvestites are supported by PayPal (that is, the directors of PayPal) in their fight with North Carolina. BLM is funded by Soros. Fuckerberg wants to bust the borders and flood the USA with aliens. Sheldon Adelson wants the same.

    It delights my heart that you care only for class, not the trivia of race and gender that the rest of the planet is deeply concerned about. You need to step into a time machine set for 1914 and join in an animated discussion with your fellow proletarians about why the German proletariat will never, never fight their class comrades in the Russian proletariat. Their common enemies are the Kaiser and the Tsar!

    Then, come back to 2016 a sadder and a wiser man.
    , @pink_point
    Yes, the 0,1%.

    I wonder why many refer to the tyranny apparatus as "the 1%". It's cleary the 0.1%, or maybe even the 0.01%.
  11. mtn cur says:

    Everyone in the gangbang hoods has PTSD, formerly known as combat fatigue and thus, inner city cops, and kids are battle happy and go to fight flight mode for any or no reason. Due to epigenetic effects, grandpa cop and grandpa black infect the young and so they will flip out even for imaginary “micro-aggressions. My neighborhood was dodge city till everybody got tired of punks and started dropping a dime on them. Any who did not get out of town in the next few days and stay out, went to jail. It remains a “Christian” neighborhood 14 years later, but they use cell phones and don’t bother with pay phones anymore. Maybe we need to create refugee camps for X number blocks to include schools, grocery and drug stores and declare a free fire zone for the rest, after using the snow plow/salt spreader trucks to scatter several thousand rounds of P+P 9mm and comic book manuals on instinct shooting in the outlaw areas. If you teach them to hold the iron straight instead of sideways, they will thin each other out to those smart enough to see that the ones going school and playing ball don’t go to the emergency room or the morgue near as often.

    Read More
  12. Marty says:
    @WorkingClass
    I'm a working class white guy living in a majority black city in the deep south. I know a lot of black people who work for a living and are not criminals. They don't like the gang bangers any more than I do. They are the victims of black on black crime. I live in a mixed neighborhood which is less dangerous than the all black neighborhoods. Still, the swat teams here manage to break into the wrong address and shoot the wrong people. The police are the only thing keeping the gangs of thugs down. But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.

    Black Lives Matter is funded, I am told, by Mr. Soros. What I would tell BLM is they are being used to exacerbate racial strife in America. Keeping black and white at each others throats is public policy. What I would tell comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer, is that police brutality and criminality are real. That the war on drugs with its vast gulag of jails and prisons is real.

    We all have a common enemy. The Police State and the scumbags who own it. We will have neither liberty nor peace and prosperity until we unite against our oppressors. Not BLM. Not Mexicans. Not queers or feminists or cry babies on campus. Not white racists or red necks. But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    “comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer …”

    You’re an idiot. Lawyer fees will bankrupt anyone merely “middle class.” Did you somehow miss last week’s much ballyhooed news that most peeople can’t come up with $400 for an emergency? Also, you may be the only guy on Unz who never read “The Bonfire of the Vanities.” Ever heard of the phrase Great White Defendant? Cops need white arrestees to balance the racial books. It’s just that being middle class means not doing street crime, whereas in blackife middle class = Not Keeping it Real.

    Read More
  13. Jefferson says:

    Does anybody here notice the disproportionate number of Homosexuals in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    The organization was started by 3 Dykes and Deray McKesson the BLM member who ran for mayor of Baltimore is a Gay man.

    Anybody here have a theory as to why LGBT who make up only 3 percent of The U.S population, are found in much higher percentages in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88
    Blacks are more likely to be gay, that's why.
    , @Clyde

    Does anybody here notice the disproportionate number of Homosexuals in the Black Lies Matter movement? The organization was started by 3 Dykes and Deray McKesson the BLM member who ran for mayor of Baltimore is a Gay man. Anybody here have a theory as to why LGBT who make up only 3 percent of The U.S population, are found in much higher percentages in the Black Lies Matter movement?
     
    Because intelligent black men have a greater tendency to be gay than intelligent white men. NE Asians even less so. Male artists tend to be gay. Among NE Asians you will find this the least, more specifically the Japanese.

    Billy Strayhorn was Duke Ellington's arranger who wrote "Take The A Train". He was black and gay and his interesting "life and times of" biography was written 1995. The good old days when gays had a work ethic, produced without making a spectacle of themselves.

    , @Almost Missouri
    BLM is a gay movement masquerading as a black one.

    Due to the endless propagandizing of the "civil rights era", black gays can get more automatic public acceptance by presenting themselves as black rather than gay.
    , @Anonymous
    Because BLM is an expression of cultural marxism (street manifestation of critical theory, where the theory is little more than to destructively criticize), and homosexuals have always been some of the loudest and proudest cultual marxists?
    , @Sbaker
    because the lesbians and the male coprophiliacs are attempting to co-opt the civil rights movement for political gain. The few Africans I know resent the hell out of being equated to some sexual deviant with mental and physical diseases.
  14. Technomad says:

    I keep hearing and hearing and hearing about blacks that aren’t criminals and don’t support crime. But where the hell are they when black “spokesmen” are howling about some dindu getting a bullet for his monkeyshines? The “law-abiding” blacks can either turn on their criminal kin, or can suffer along with them. I’m sick of them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @boogerbently
    Guilt by association. Just like what's happening with the muslims.
  15. @Jefferson
    "Black lives don’t matter to other blacks….they slaughter each other relentlessly."

    Black lives only matter to Blacks when racial outsiders like Whites kill one of their tribesmen.

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.

    this in-group out-group thinking is probably evolutionary useful. Inter-group violence has the potential to become an existential thread, while I have never heard of a people who disappeared because of intra-group, criminal violence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "this in-group out-group thinking is probably evolutionary useful. Inter-group violence has the potential to become an existential thread, while I have never heard of a people who disappeared because of intra-group, criminal violence."

    On average around 5,000 thousand Black men disappear from this country each year because of Black on Black murder. So don't give me that shit.

    You are an epic fail trying to compare the rare White on Black homicide to the disapppearance genocide of the Black race. There is reason why White on Black murder is compared to man bites dog.

    White on Black murder would be even more miniscule if Mixed Race Hispanics who murder Blacks did not statistically count as White on Black murder.
    , @Gene Su
    Erik, you are totally incorrect. No nation or people has been solely defeated from the outside. All fallen nations were weakened by dangerous internal flaws, including incessant civil war.
    The Romans had a few centuries of bread and circuses and uncontrolled immigration and constant war (just like us) before the Empire was overrun by Huns, Goths, Vandals, and Franks. The Byzantines and Persians incessantly fought one another before being overrun by the Arab Muslims. The Abbasid Empire was weakened by civil war before being overrun by the Mongols. The Byzantine Empire was splintered into 3 factions for 2 centuries before being overrun by the Ottoman Turks.
    I usually have more sympathy for blacks, but they had better be watching out. If they keep killing one another like this, I can imagine a future when they will complete lose their political leverage due to disunity, disorder, and depletion.
  16. Svigor says:

    Maybe blacks want things a lot like they are now. They have a set of perpetual grievances to mobilize their demographic at will. Whenever the leadership is low on funds, they can go and shake this money tree. They also have mostly decent policing, and a government and establishment that are hyper-sensitive to them, their needs, and their complaints (regardless of merit). They have a majority snookered by the delusions of racial equality and white guilt.

    What’s not to like? Trouble is, they believe their own BS, and actually seem to think a majority non-white America will be more amenable to their concerns and demands. Which is pretty hilarious, when you think about it. Favelas and shantytowns are in their not-too-distant future, but thinking ahead has never been their forte.

    If they had any sense, they’d be protecting the white demographic as their most precious natural resource, because it is.

    Read More
    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    If blacks had any sense, they would have fought tooth and nail against immigration. They didn't. They will reap what they have sown for that decision.

    Look at Hillary's campaign. There's no new programs to help the poor. Just SJW talk. I suspect that we're at or near Peak Black. As the country grows poorer and more Brazil-like, there will be less and less to dole out. Hispanics and Asians hate blacks. Whites will become a smaller portion of the population. What's more, whites aren't having the best of times.

    No, the pie will get smaller and more groups will be taking their piece. Black will get less. Of course, they're too stupid to realize this.
    , @Jaego
    Yes, the fable of the Goose that lays the golden egg is well beyond their intelligence. Just kill the Goose and eat it.
    , @Gemjunior
    You are absolutely on point here. There are many solutions to the problem such as black cops only in black neighborhoods, separate but equal towns, etc. but they do not want a solution. They are immature to the extent that most black people remain in their teens psychologically, due to the makeup of their genetics, their growth patterns and IQ development. Black babies mature at a rate faster than white babies do - they have a larger head circumference at birth than white babies do, they sit up before white babies, roll over before white, walk first, etc. and this is borne out in developmental tests over many years. This growth continues until the age of about 14 and then slows to a halt. This is the reason for the behavior.

    This refers to the averages, not outliers. There are many blacks who are not only mature and wise, but extremely intelligent as well.

  17. Jefferson says:
    @Erik Sieven
    this in-group out-group thinking is probably evolutionary useful. Inter-group violence has the potential to become an existential thread, while I have never heard of a people who disappeared because of intra-group, criminal violence.

    “this in-group out-group thinking is probably evolutionary useful. Inter-group violence has the potential to become an existential thread, while I have never heard of a people who disappeared because of intra-group, criminal violence.”

    On average around 5,000 thousand Black men disappear from this country each year because of Black on Black murder. So don’t give me that shit.

    You are an epic fail trying to compare the rare White on Black homicide to the disapppearance genocide of the Black race. There is reason why White on Black murder is compared to man bites dog.

    White on Black murder would be even more miniscule if Mixed Race Hispanics who murder Blacks did not statistically count as White on Black murder.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    No, Erik is correct. The danger to your group, generally, is outside groups. No matter the violence and disagreements within your group, you always - always - rally together against the outsider.

    Blacks understand this; whites don't. Either whites figure this out, or they will disappear - and rightly so.
    , @Ozymandias
    "On average around 5,000 thousand Black men disappear from this country each year because of Black on Black murder."

    In 'Big Man' societies, the ones who survive the slaughter impregnate twenty or thirty women. Those other guys were superfluous in regards to producing the next generation.
  18. Realist says:
    @Jefferson
    "Black lives don’t matter to other blacks….they slaughter each other relentlessly."

    Black lives only matter to Blacks when racial outsiders like Whites kill one of their tribesmen.

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.

    Yes, right you are.

    Read More
  19. @Jefferson
    "Black lives don’t matter to other blacks….they slaughter each other relentlessly."

    Black lives only matter to Blacks when racial outsiders like Whites kill one of their tribesmen.

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.

    You are correct. This is one of the few (only?) areas where blacks have a better understanding of the world than whites.

    Me against my brother, etc., etc. Whites have been on top for so long, we’ve begun to think that our “shit don’t stink.” We’d better learn that, like everyone else on the planet, we need to fight piece of paradise or someone will – indeed, should – take it from us.

    We’ll see.

    Read More
  20. @Jefferson
    "this in-group out-group thinking is probably evolutionary useful. Inter-group violence has the potential to become an existential thread, while I have never heard of a people who disappeared because of intra-group, criminal violence."

    On average around 5,000 thousand Black men disappear from this country each year because of Black on Black murder. So don't give me that shit.

    You are an epic fail trying to compare the rare White on Black homicide to the disapppearance genocide of the Black race. There is reason why White on Black murder is compared to man bites dog.

    White on Black murder would be even more miniscule if Mixed Race Hispanics who murder Blacks did not statistically count as White on Black murder.

    No, Erik is correct. The danger to your group, generally, is outside groups. No matter the violence and disagreements within your group, you always – always – rally together against the outsider.

    Blacks understand this; whites don’t. Either whites figure this out, or they will disappear – and rightly so.

    Read More
    • Agree: Ace
    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "No, Erik is correct. The danger to your group, generally, is outside groups. ?"

    Erik is 1,000% wrong. White America poses zero danger to Black America and statistics back me, statistics don't back you.
  21. @Svigor
    Maybe blacks want things a lot like they are now. They have a set of perpetual grievances to mobilize their demographic at will. Whenever the leadership is low on funds, they can go and shake this money tree. They also have mostly decent policing, and a government and establishment that are hyper-sensitive to them, their needs, and their complaints (regardless of merit). They have a majority snookered by the delusions of racial equality and white guilt.

    What's not to like? Trouble is, they believe their own BS, and actually seem to think a majority non-white America will be more amenable to their concerns and demands. Which is pretty hilarious, when you think about it. Favelas and shantytowns are in their not-too-distant future, but thinking ahead has never been their forte.

    If they had any sense, they'd be protecting the white demographic as their most precious natural resource, because it is.

    If blacks had any sense, they would have fought tooth and nail against immigration. They didn’t. They will reap what they have sown for that decision.

    Look at Hillary’s campaign. There’s no new programs to help the poor. Just SJW talk. I suspect that we’re at or near Peak Black. As the country grows poorer and more Brazil-like, there will be less and less to dole out. Hispanics and Asians hate blacks. Whites will become a smaller portion of the population. What’s more, whites aren’t having the best of times.

    No, the pie will get smaller and more groups will be taking their piece. Black will get less. Of course, they’re too stupid to realize this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "Hispanics and Asians hate blacks."

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.
    , @pink_point
    "Of course, they’re too stupid to realize this."

    I don't think they are stupid.
    I think who misleads them is, unfortunately, terribly clever.
  22. @WorkingClass
    I'm a working class white guy living in a majority black city in the deep south. I know a lot of black people who work for a living and are not criminals. They don't like the gang bangers any more than I do. They are the victims of black on black crime. I live in a mixed neighborhood which is less dangerous than the all black neighborhoods. Still, the swat teams here manage to break into the wrong address and shoot the wrong people. The police are the only thing keeping the gangs of thugs down. But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.

    Black Lives Matter is funded, I am told, by Mr. Soros. What I would tell BLM is they are being used to exacerbate racial strife in America. Keeping black and white at each others throats is public policy. What I would tell comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer, is that police brutality and criminality are real. That the war on drugs with its vast gulag of jails and prisons is real.

    We all have a common enemy. The Police State and the scumbags who own it. We will have neither liberty nor peace and prosperity until we unite against our oppressors. Not BLM. Not Mexicans. Not queers or feminists or cry babies on campus. Not white racists or red necks. But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    “But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.”

    No. Both black and white people have ample reason to fear . . . young black men. Blacks are 13% of the population but commit 50% of the murders. Blacks commit violent crime at seven times the rate of whites.

    Black are incapable AS A GROUP to maintain anything close to a civilization. Yes, there are a fair number of reasonable blacks. But there aren’t enough. On their own, blacks descend into near anarchy.

    Yes, the 0.01% are trying to screw us over. However, that doesn’t mean that we need to tie arms with our black brothers. You can hate the 0.01% and understand that blacks can’t as a group function.

    Read More
  23. Jefferson says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    No, Erik is correct. The danger to your group, generally, is outside groups. No matter the violence and disagreements within your group, you always - always - rally together against the outsider.

    Blacks understand this; whites don't. Either whites figure this out, or they will disappear - and rightly so.

    “No, Erik is correct. The danger to your group, generally, is outside groups. ?”

    Erik is 1,000% wrong. White America poses zero danger to Black America and statistics back me, statistics don’t back you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Maj. Kong
    If Deportation of illegals (Muslims, etc.), becomes Repatriation, that may change.

    Imagine a US where the average black would think moving to Africa is a good idea.
  24. Jefferson says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    If blacks had any sense, they would have fought tooth and nail against immigration. They didn't. They will reap what they have sown for that decision.

    Look at Hillary's campaign. There's no new programs to help the poor. Just SJW talk. I suspect that we're at or near Peak Black. As the country grows poorer and more Brazil-like, there will be less and less to dole out. Hispanics and Asians hate blacks. Whites will become a smaller portion of the population. What's more, whites aren't having the best of times.

    No, the pie will get smaller and more groups will be taking their piece. Black will get less. Of course, they're too stupid to realize this.

    “Hispanics and Asians hate blacks.”

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rich
    Asians and Hispanics are very often victims of Black crime and have little sympathy or love for the descendants of slaves. Asians are probably the most racist people in the world and if they look down on Whitey, what do you think is their opinion of Blacks? When I was in the Army I remember Black soldiers complaining that even Korean hookers wouldn't have anything to do with them, money be damned.
    , @Salger
    "Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks."

    The Chinese looting Zimbabwe?

    "Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.''

    ''Social Justice Warriors'' have a habit of being well-off city types who meet in select circles. East Asians being among them doesn't speak of how East Asians as a group act.
    , @Twinkie

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.
     
    That's an utter nonsense. Housing and residential patterns show that Asians integrate far better with whites than blacks do (Hispanics are in-between).

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes.
     
    Hispanics are, yes (except Cubans). Asians vary depending on country of origin and time period. During some elections they vote for Democrats; in others they vote Republican. Koreans and Vietnamese tend to vote Republican while Indians vote heavily for Democrats.

    They are not the new Italians and Irish.
     
    Those groups voted heavily for corrupt machine politics early in their immigrant histories.

    They are not culturally assimilating into White America.
     
    The Manhattan Institute has been studying assimilation of major immigrant groups for a number of years now. Culturally, Filipinos, Vietnamese, Koreans, and Cubans assimilate at high rates. Indians, Chinese, and Mexicans do so at low rates.
    , @RadicalCenter
    I'm a white American / European-American and very proud of it. My Asian wife would be surprised to hear that she hates me. Our very American and apolitical Asian friends don't hate me either. The fault line in dire times will be Africans against whites and Asians (and hopefully Mexicans) wherever the latter are threatened or live concentrations of Africans, not white versus Asian for the most part.

    There's anti-white animus among arrogant Asians to some extent in the USA, for sure, but Asians are often "reachable" and amenable to a way of life more like ours. In a situation of prolonged rioting or mob attacks, which will surely be or become racially delineated, Asians even more so will need the remaining whites for either of them to survive, and vice versa.
    , @rod1963
    Hispanics do not like blacks period.

    In Los Angeles, there is a well known phenomena of ethnic cleansing of blacks from Hispanic neighborhoods. They'll have a Mexican gang member kill a few black bucks to send a message to the rest to leave and they do. The LAPD is fully aware of it but can't do or say anything about it.
    , @Anonymous
    Los Angeles is ground zero, when the economy collapses it will be like "Escape From New York", the racial tension here is at the explosive stage, it will not take a match it will explode on it's own- immigration has so utterly wrecked California there will never be a livable city again that isn't in standoff mode. The f'n Asians are the worst, they brought their dog eat dog greedy selfish vain garbage cultures with them.
    , @Brohemius
    Wishful thinking. Cling to your fantasy as long as you can. Reality hurts!
  25. Gene Su says:
    @Erik Sieven
    this in-group out-group thinking is probably evolutionary useful. Inter-group violence has the potential to become an existential thread, while I have never heard of a people who disappeared because of intra-group, criminal violence.

    Erik, you are totally incorrect. No nation or people has been solely defeated from the outside. All fallen nations were weakened by dangerous internal flaws, including incessant civil war.
    The Romans had a few centuries of bread and circuses and uncontrolled immigration and constant war (just like us) before the Empire was overrun by Huns, Goths, Vandals, and Franks. The Byzantines and Persians incessantly fought one another before being overrun by the Arab Muslims. The Abbasid Empire was weakened by civil war before being overrun by the Mongols. The Byzantine Empire was splintered into 3 factions for 2 centuries before being overrun by the Ottoman Turks.
    I usually have more sympathy for blacks, but they had better be watching out. If they keep killing one another like this, I can imagine a future when they will complete lose their political leverage due to disunity, disorder, and depletion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @europeasant
    "If they keep killing one another like this, I can imagine a future when they will complete lose their political leverage due to disunity, disorder, and depletion"

    I don't know about the political leverage but they definitely will not be depleted. Their population has been steadily at about 12% 13% for the last hundred years or so. What this means in absolute numbers is that there are currently about 40 million in the US. If they are still at 13% by the year 2050 when the US total population may be 500 million is that there will be approx 60 million.
    Yes they kill each other at large rates but they have a higher birth rate which more than offsets their death rate.
  26. Repatriation is the only viable solution to the negro question.

    There is no way to satisfy the negro, so why even bother trying?

    Sterilization may also be effective. Perhaps a one time payment of $5,000 would be enough of an incentive to draw in black women to undergo voluntary sterilization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    Even at 10 times that figure, 100% return on investment in five years.
  27. […] noreply@blogger.com (VD) Fred Reed asks Black Lives Matter if they prefer integration and being subject to the white man’s laws or separation and […]

    Read More
  28. Rich says:
    @Jefferson
    "Hispanics and Asians hate blacks."

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.

    Asians and Hispanics are very often victims of Black crime and have little sympathy or love for the descendants of slaves. Asians are probably the most racist people in the world and if they look down on Whitey, what do you think is their opinion of Blacks? When I was in the Army I remember Black soldiers complaining that even Korean hookers wouldn’t have anything to do with them, money be damned.

    Read More
  29. Fred is being rational here. The problem with groups such as “black lives matter” and of liberals in general is that they are not rational. They are emoting. This is why they never discuss specific ideas. It hurts their brains too much to think.

    Read More
  30. dcite says:
    @WorkingClass
    I'm a working class white guy living in a majority black city in the deep south. I know a lot of black people who work for a living and are not criminals. They don't like the gang bangers any more than I do. They are the victims of black on black crime. I live in a mixed neighborhood which is less dangerous than the all black neighborhoods. Still, the swat teams here manage to break into the wrong address and shoot the wrong people. The police are the only thing keeping the gangs of thugs down. But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.

    Black Lives Matter is funded, I am told, by Mr. Soros. What I would tell BLM is they are being used to exacerbate racial strife in America. Keeping black and white at each others throats is public policy. What I would tell comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer, is that police brutality and criminality are real. That the war on drugs with its vast gulag of jails and prisons is real.

    We all have a common enemy. The Police State and the scumbags who own it. We will have neither liberty nor peace and prosperity until we unite against our oppressors. Not BLM. Not Mexicans. Not queers or feminists or cry babies on campus. Not white racists or red necks. But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    I couldn’t afford a lawyer. Most whites I know would dread having to pay a lawyer because it might bankrupt them, just like the medical fees the illegals get for free. I work with someone who talked abut her relative getting emergency care in the hospital and then was not able to pay, so the debt was “forgiven.” That doesn’t happen for native whites. Probably doesn’t happen for native anybody. But it does happen for non-natives who are here to make money on us, even if they are well intentioned. I had been complaining to my colleague about the possibility of back breaking medical debt when she told that story; I didn’t want to say that that wouldn’t work for a native white.

    Read More
  31. […] through the comments on this post, which has a reference to a Fred blurb, I came across a very astute summary of the […]

    Read More
  32. If blacks had any sense, they would have fought tooth and nail against immigration. They didn’t.

    That’s changing with the Trump candidacy. I expect Trump to get a bigger share of the Black vote than any Republican since WWII, largely because of the immigration issue.

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks.

    Not when the chips are down, they don’t. My (white) stepson spent several months in California county jails, where segregation of whites, blacks and Mexicans was strictly enforced by the inmates themselves (your own people would beat you up if you fraternized across racial lines). He reported that if a full-scale riot broke out, the Mexicans would side with the whites against the blacks.

    Read More
  33. Salger says:
    @Jefferson
    "Hispanics and Asians hate blacks."

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.

    “Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks.”

    The Chinese looting Zimbabwe?

    “Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.”

    ”Social Justice Warriors” have a habit of being well-off city types who meet in select circles. East Asians being among them doesn’t speak of how East Asians as a group act.

    Read More
  34. @Gene Su
    Erik, you are totally incorrect. No nation or people has been solely defeated from the outside. All fallen nations were weakened by dangerous internal flaws, including incessant civil war.
    The Romans had a few centuries of bread and circuses and uncontrolled immigration and constant war (just like us) before the Empire was overrun by Huns, Goths, Vandals, and Franks. The Byzantines and Persians incessantly fought one another before being overrun by the Arab Muslims. The Abbasid Empire was weakened by civil war before being overrun by the Mongols. The Byzantine Empire was splintered into 3 factions for 2 centuries before being overrun by the Ottoman Turks.
    I usually have more sympathy for blacks, but they had better be watching out. If they keep killing one another like this, I can imagine a future when they will complete lose their political leverage due to disunity, disorder, and depletion.

    “If they keep killing one another like this, I can imagine a future when they will complete lose their political leverage due to disunity, disorder, and depletion”

    I don’t know about the political leverage but they definitely will not be depleted. Their population has been steadily at about 12% 13% for the last hundred years or so. What this means in absolute numbers is that there are currently about 40 million in the US. If they are still at 13% by the year 2050 when the US total population may be 500 million is that there will be approx 60 million.
    Yes they kill each other at large rates but they have a higher birth rate which more than offsets their death rate.

    Read More
  35. Ace says:
    @Son of Dixie
    Repatriation is the only viable solution to the negro question.

    There is no way to satisfy the negro, so why even bother trying?

    Sterilization may also be effective. Perhaps a one time payment of $5,000 would be enough of an incentive to draw in black women to undergo voluntary sterilization.

    Even at 10 times that figure, 100% return on investment in five years.

    Read More
  36. Solemnity says:

    Even if only Black cops policed Black neighborhoods, Blacks would still complain and say that the “Black cops are controlled by the White Establishment”.

    Slavery was a huge mistake in many, many ways.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    BLM is basically fuckers playing victims and wanting others to suffer as they have suffered in their imagination, I would go as far as delusion or being use as leverage for extortion.

    Slavery is over, has been over for 60 years now. yes, I do use the civil rights movement as the end date. But I blame the blacks for everything that happened after the movement. 20 years is enough to turn their lives around. it is enough to build an entire generation of new blacks.

    it seems the only thing the blacks learned for the last 60 years is to have a few loud mouth clowns to stand in front of the media. it is like having a door to a house with no walls or roof.

    , @Clyde

    Even if only Black cops policed Black neighborhoods, Blacks would still complain and say that the “Black cops are controlled by the White Establishment”.
     
    They can get away with this today. But it would wear thin very quickly if widely implemented. Only black cops policing black communities. Only white cops for white communities.
  37. jay says:

    We should stop caring and remove the wicked from existence. Those who murder must be put to death.

    Read More
  38. @Jefferson
    Does anybody here notice the disproportionate number of Homosexuals in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    The organization was started by 3 Dykes and Deray McKesson the BLM member who ran for mayor of Baltimore is a Gay man.

    Anybody here have a theory as to why LGBT who make up only 3 percent of The U.S population, are found in much higher percentages in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    Blacks are more likely to be gay, that’s why.

    Read More
  39. @Rich
    All they want is to cry, whine and destroy. The majority of Blacks don't care about the victims of crime, they just care about jumping up and down and getting free stuff when the looting starts. I've never seen a demonstration anywhere in the world where Black people have sided with law and order. Everyone knows it, but most scared Whites are afraid to admit it, even to themselves. I have a feeling that when Hilary opens the border and legalizes the illegals, Blacks won't get away with the games they've been playing all these years. I don't think a majority Hispanic USA is going to have much use for them.

    Who cares about your “opinion”? You’re already on record as having given up.

    Read More
  40. John Doe says:

    Mr. Reed,

    With all due respect, all that is due of course, I’m not entirely sure what you’re talking about.

    What is your “final solution” to these “issues” ?

    Can you spell it out for me in a more specific and straightforward way?

    I am one that is persuadable.

    So I am just wondering.

    Please elaborate more.

    Read More
  41. @Solemnity
    Even if only Black cops policed Black neighborhoods, Blacks would still complain and say that the "Black cops are controlled by the White Establishment".

    Slavery was a huge mistake in many, many ways.

    BLM is basically fuckers playing victims and wanting others to suffer as they have suffered in their imagination, I would go as far as delusion or being use as leverage for extortion.

    Slavery is over, has been over for 60 years now. yes, I do use the civil rights movement as the end date. But I blame the blacks for everything that happened after the movement. 20 years is enough to turn their lives around. it is enough to build an entire generation of new blacks.

    it seems the only thing the blacks learned for the last 60 years is to have a few loud mouth clowns to stand in front of the media. it is like having a door to a house with no walls or roof.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dcite
    60 years? Dating it from the Civil Rights movement? If you are talking about "Jim Crow," that was in the southern states, and even among them, there was variation in application. There were blacks who were educated and did well even there. There were even blacks, mostly mixed, who owned slaves before 1862.
    In the north, there was no official segregation, or at least little that was mandated by law. There have been black college graduates since the mid-1800s (Howard University, named for Union General Howard) was founded shortly after the Civil War; Oberlin College admitted blacks since its founding in the 1830s.

    The civil rights movement had legitimate motivations, quite frankly. Yes, people of sub-Saharan African descent are not really compatible or assimilatable, for the most part, with persons of European or most Asian descents, but we're stuck with each other. They're here because of greedy businessmen of earlier centuries. I think of those greedy slave shippers, Gentile and Jew, as I think of the destructive corporations that have wrought such havoc today. Same mentality. A few make a lot of money and the mass of people who benefitted only tangentially if at all, are left with the nasty consequences, even blamed for them.\
    What was not emphasized enough during the civil rights movement, was that with rights go reponsibilities. They want rights, rights, and more rights, but I don't know if they ever even think of the word, "responsibility."

  42. White racism and White privilege have made ‘Murka an impossible place for Blacks, who yearn to breathe free and express their full human potential: just look at those 3 Black faces above, brutalized by years of White rule, but still dripping the milk of human kindness. This can only happen in Africa, genetic home of the Black race and a land of peace and plenty. There they can run, jump, and be happy, free of White oppression. One of the many positive outcomes of Civil War II will be a complete repatriation of any and all Blacks who survive to the Dark Continent. I’m guessing it won’t be many though

    Read More
  43. 5371 says:
    @Haxo Angmark
    White racism and White privilege have made 'Murka an impossible place for Blacks, who yearn to breathe free and express their full human potential: just look at those 3 Black faces above, brutalized by years of White rule, but still dripping the milk of human kindness. This can only happen in Africa, genetic home of the Black race and a land of peace and plenty. There they can run, jump, and be happy, free of White oppression. One of the many positive outcomes of Civil War II will be a complete repatriation of any and all Blacks who survive to the Dark Continent. I'm guessing it won't be many though

    You forgot gambol and frolic.

    Read More
  44. Clyde says:
    @Jefferson
    Does anybody here notice the disproportionate number of Homosexuals in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    The organization was started by 3 Dykes and Deray McKesson the BLM member who ran for mayor of Baltimore is a Gay man.

    Anybody here have a theory as to why LGBT who make up only 3 percent of The U.S population, are found in much higher percentages in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    Does anybody here notice the disproportionate number of Homosexuals in the Black Lies Matter movement? The organization was started by 3 Dykes and Deray McKesson the BLM member who ran for mayor of Baltimore is a Gay man. Anybody here have a theory as to why LGBT who make up only 3 percent of The U.S population, are found in much higher percentages in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    Because intelligent black men have a greater tendency to be gay than intelligent white men. NE Asians even less so. Male artists tend to be gay. Among NE Asians you will find this the least, more specifically the Japanese.

    Billy Strayhorn was Duke Ellington’s arranger who wrote “Take The A Train”. He was black and gay and his interesting “life and times of” biography was written 1995. The good old days when gays had a work ethic, produced without making a spectacle of themselves.

    Read More
  45. Twinkie says:
    @Jefferson
    "Hispanics and Asians hate blacks."

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    That’s an utter nonsense. Housing and residential patterns show that Asians integrate far better with whites than blacks do (Hispanics are in-between).

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes.

    Hispanics are, yes (except Cubans). Asians vary depending on country of origin and time period. During some elections they vote for Democrats; in others they vote Republican. Koreans and Vietnamese tend to vote Republican while Indians vote heavily for Democrats.

    They are not the new Italians and Irish.

    Those groups voted heavily for corrupt machine politics early in their immigrant histories.

    They are not culturally assimilating into White America.

    The Manhattan Institute has been studying assimilation of major immigrant groups for a number of years now. Culturally, Filipinos, Vietnamese, Koreans, and Cubans assimilate at high rates. Indians, Chinese, and Mexicans do so at low rates.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stan d Mute

    Hispanics are, yes (except Cubans).
     
    This is changing. Cubans used to be dependable republicans. Not so much today. Miami-Dade County is ground zero for Cubans and is today pretty reliably Democrat. It's not a seamless fit however, as Tom Wolfe noted in his Back to Blood, the Cubans have zero compassion for the American negroes, Haitians, and Jamaicans. Also, the Cubans have drawn in behind them a large and growing population of Central Americans due to predominance of Spanish over English. We also see some real strongholds like Weston in Broward County now called colloquially "Westonzuela" for all the Venezuelans. Colombians have blended a bit better along the lines of Guatemalans, Nicaraguans, and Salvadorans. About all that's missing is a large Mexican population (disliked intensely by all other Central Americans as well as Cubans), Chileans, and Argentines. And of course as the financial capital of Latin America, Miami (Brickell and East of Biscayne Blvd) and Miami Beach are chock full of the wealthiest elites from all Latin America (and even Spain).

    Anyway, the point, again, was that the negroes are unwanted and disliked by all the Latinos regardless of origin and despite the Cuban shift from republican to democrat party. Old school Cubans are still strongly republican, but younger Cubans are voting with the other Latino groups.
    , @Intelligent Dasein
    I think a lot more Mexicans would assimilate if we would stop mollycoddling them and tell them in no uncertain terms that they will not be allowed to play the victim card.

    My job requires me to visit many different neighborhoods. From the ground level, I get to see everything from the $2 million mansion homes to the places you wouldn't want to get caught in after dark. Many of the older suburban neighborhoods---the places that once nestled young White families 40 years ago---are now overrun by Hispanics, with a few Asians (mostly Hmong or Laotian, I'm guessing, from the names) and the elderly White remnant living among them. It's one of the unmistakable symptoms of a neighborhood in decline.

    But I'm continually impressed by how "normal" the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans---the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar---but the kids are delightful. They all speak English, usually without any trace of a Cholo accent. They may be bilingual, but they seem to have very little interest in speaking Spanish. And they want to wear the same clothes, eat the same foods, play the same video games, and watch the same TV shows as as all the White children of comparable age. A few years later, when they become teenagers, the girls like to flaunt their figures in Lululemon halter tops and listen to club music. Not exactly the wisest choices in and of themselves, but it's the same thing the young White girls are doing, which was my point.

    Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable. The single biggest factor preventing them from doing so is the White liberal culture that wants to "raise Hispanic consciousness" by first deliberately creating an identity ghetto for these people and then by attaching perks for those who maintain such an identity. Absent that, Mexican assimilation would go much quicker and smoother, for they do not seem to possess the inherent incapacity for White society as, for example, the Blacks do.

    By the way, none of this should be taken to mean that I want any more Mexicans in the USA. I am pro-Trump and pro-Wall. But I think we could do a much better job with the Mexicans already here by simply dropping the victimization game.
    , @Anon
    There is something to what Jefferson says.

    You are of an older generation of Asian-Americans and a Christian to boot, so you think differently.

    Yellows are a slavish race and wanna fit into the prevailing narrative.

    Even though US was most instrumental in dividing your nation and giving half to Stalin(it was US idea to have Russians come in) and even though US bombing of the North was near-genocidal---and even though US foreign policy is geared to keep divided Korea forever to use SK as a puppet client--, you dutifully became a Christian and serve the USA.
    Back when you were growing up, US was proudly Christian and still dominated by Anglo-Americans. So, slavish and dog-like Koreans followed that model of Americanism. Koreans, like all yellows, worship authority and power, and US seemed so powerful. So, you became like a wanna-be American in spirituality, politics, and world-view.

    Unlike Korea that modernized without sovereignty--under Japanese and then under American domination--, Japan modernized with sovereignty and thus developed more of an independent mindset. Also, its geographical separation from China also helped it develop more of a unique mindset. (But as Japanese dependency on the US continues long after end of WWII, Japan too is losing its sense of national uniqueness and sovereignty and turning into a material society with no identity, heritage, and meaning. Japanese live on junk food and junk anime culture.)
    In contrast, because Korea as stuck next to China as a kind of vassal state, the Korean cultural mindset is to follow and imitate the Big Power. It used to be China for 2000 yrs. Now, it's the US, and South Koreans are the biggest dogs in the world. And you are a prime example.

    Of course, a lot of good and even great things were achieved by Koreans under foreign rule. Though Kors bitch about Japan, Japan did much to modernize Korea and bring it into the 20th century. And thanks to US protection and markets, SK was able to economically develop and make considerable progress. But it is nevertheless a whore nation without sovereignty. It is also a coward nation. Little Israel defends itself by itself even though surrounded by hostile nations. But even though SK has a much bigger population and demographic advantage over NK -- some say SK economy is 30x that of NK --, SK is still a whore-bitch that begs for US protection from their starving national brethren up north. Also, if SK is really under threat, shouldn't south koreans stay and protect their own nation? But no, they run from their own nation and come to the US and other nations. Also, SK boys now act like pansy boys. And these girly men ask Americans to defend them. What a nation of pussy cowards. They scream about threat from the starving north, act like girly boys, and hide behind uncle sam for protection.. while so many Kors wanna leave their country and settle elsewhere permanently.

    Of course, US is now a very different nation, and the world is very different. There was a time in the Cold War when it was US vs USSR and Red China. And SK fell into US orbit. As communism sucks, it had no choice but to be US's bitch. Same with Japan and Taiwan. As China and USSR backed NK, SK had to stick with US.

    But Cold War is long gone. China wants good relations with both NK and SK, and indeed is now closer to SK. Russia is no longer an enemy and wants good relations with both NK and SK. Cold War is so over. And SK is happy to deal with China and Russia.
    So, what it the problem? It is NK and US. NK is ruled by a shitter, but US also deserves much blame. Surely, US knows the Cold War is over. Surely, US knows NK poses no threat to any nation despite its bad boy antics. NK poses a threat to whom? China, Japan, Russia, the US? It may pose some threat to SK, but even norks know they cannot conquer SK. Also, if NK attacked first, NO NATION, not even China, would come to its side. They would all condemn NK and side with SK. US could end all sanctions and tensions with NK if it wanted to. If US did with NK what it is now doing with Cuba, then NK will likely gradually come to the table.

    So, why does US still act like NK poses some kind of grave threat?
    Two reasons.

    1. Jews. Jews don't give a shit about NK. The ONLY reason NK became an issue was because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. That's it. Jews don't give a shit about human rights. They had no problem dealing with Saudis. They don't care about Palestinians who live like Kors under Japper rule. NK became a pariah nation ONLY because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. (Never mind Israel was the closest ally of Apartheid South Africa during the Cold War.)

    2. China. US now sees China as the main rival in the Pacific, and it wants to use SK as its puppet indefinitely. If tensions were to fade between north and south and if two koreas were to slowly unite, US military will have to move out of SK. Also, as there will be so much work to be done in reunification, Kors will become more nationalist in their mindset. In order to fuse south and north, they would need to emphasize what they have in common: race, history, culture, language. Thus, Korea would become less global and more nationalist. And without US military presence, it will grow closer to China, thus reverting to its traditional role in Asia.
    This is what US doesn't want. So, it keeps ramping up tensions. Even though NK is nutty, its nuclear ambitions are purely defensive, esp in light of US criminal acts in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. What happened to Gaddafi for his goodwill gesture? He got bombed and tortured to death, and Hillary laughed about it. Neocons of GOP and Lib Zionists of Democratic Party are all warmongering sickos.

    So, in order to keep the two koreas separate forever, US keeps stirring up tensions. It ignores all its violation of international agreements and just blames NK. Now, if we see NK actions without context, they do seem nutty. But when we see them in context of American international behavior in Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine, then north korea is acting rationally. At least as much as Israel that has 300 nukes for defensive purposes. Even an evil regime can have rational reasons. NK regime is evil, but it is acting rationally since US foreign policy is evil(though most Americans are not).
    US also tries to keep the two koreas separate by making South Korea fundamentally different from the north culturally, ideologically, and even demographically. NK and SK, due to long separation, are different in many ways. But they have one thing in common: race, ancestry, traditional history, language. So, despite differences in politics and economics, both side still core commonalities that may allow reunification. But now SK is into multiculturalism. In a nation where women don't want to have kids and where so many people want to leave forever, SK is now welcoming the world to invade like Europe is doing. As SK academics, elites, and media people are all brainwashed by US globalism, they think they must follow and join the US-dominated order. Now, Kerry says the world should be without borders.

    So, with more Koreans leaving Korea and with more non-Koreans becoming 'new Koreans' and more Koreans becoming racially mixed, in time SK will become so different from NK not only in economics and politics but in race and identity and demographics. Instead of NK and SK being one race/people divided only by politics and economics, they will really become two different peoples. While NK will maintain its racial integrity, SK will become like Latin America with massive immigration and race-mixing. And these 'new koreans' will not see NK as the same race and people. (Indeed, even white wanna-be South Koreans who get plastic surgery or dream of marrying non-koreans feel ashamed of being Korean and want fuse with the West than with their racial brethren up north.)

    And then, SK will never reunite with NK, and America's great crime of having divided an innocent nation will be permanent and SK will be US's bitch-whore forever. (In contrast, Vietnam is united forever.) What the US and USSR did to Korea was not much different from what Germany and USSR did to Poland in 39. The great powers divided an innocent nation, and both sides decapitated the elites.
    In NK, the USSR wiped out the native leftists and installed puppet Kim Il Sung.
    In the SK, US backed Rhee and favored collaborators under the Japanese. And US allowed the Rhee regime to exterminate 300,000 people in a massive bloodbath that went far beyond Katyn. SK elites became so slavish to the US because without US support, they would have been removed from power for having collaborated with the Japanese. And this slavish mentality lives on to this day.

    SK now gets a black African to run for it in the olympics. SK girls get plastic surgery and dye their hair blonde to look white. SK boys put on girly makeup and try to look like white girls too. SK pop culture is worship of black thug culture. K-pop that is the main culture of SK is just a korean fantasy of Koreans being white or black. It doesn't promote and sell koreans as koreans but koreans as white/black wanna-be's.

    And with 1 million Koreans in the US, Korean-American way now is the template for SK itself. SK looks to Korean-America as model. So, what is the Korean-American Way all about? It's about race-mixing galore and loss of identity and worship of black culture and homo culture and celebrity garbage. As SK follows this Korean-American model, it will become just a imitation of California. And it will become so different from the North in culture and race that it will never unite with the North. SK will just become like a commonwealth like Puerto Rico. Or just a defacto state of US like Hawaii.

    When US was mostly white, Christian, and patriotic, many SK's looked to those modes as the model for Korea. But as US is now ruled by Jews, homos, open borders globalists, and promotes interracialism, those themes are the main template for SK.
    Like I said, yellows love to imitate and follow since they lack originality, individuality, and sense of sovereignty. This slavishness is esp big among Koreans since Korea has a long history of sucking up to big china. Now, it sucks up to Big US that is a totally degenerate nation.

    While older Korean-Americans may have voted Republican and been 'conservative', things are totally different for younger generation of Kor-Americans and Asian-Americans in general. Since all the rich cities, top colleges, pop culture, and media are so Liberal and 'leftist', most young Asian-Americans go that way because they worship power, privilege, wealth, and 'coolness'. This is even truer among Korean-Americans since they tend to be impulsive, imitative, childish, and earnest in their sucking up to whatever is 'cool' and 'hip' and 'powerful'. Since US worships Jews, homos, and blacks, younger generation of Kor-Americans are into worship of that stuff.

    Even though younger Korean-Americans disagree with you on lots of issues, you and they have one thing in common. Both you and they arrived at values and attitudes due to slavishness to the great power. When you were young, US was still about white power, Christianity, majority power, and etc. So, you came to respect and admire those things about America.

    Today, US is all about minority privilege, homo worship, Jewish supremacy, black cool. So, today's young Korean-Americans imitate and follow those themes and narratives.

    If you want a taste of what most young Korean-Americans are into, go to twitter and check out Jay Caspian Kang(journalist) and look at his tweets and those of his friends. They just suck up to what is the new prevailing Americanism... just like older generation of Koreans were into the prevailing Americanism when they were young(when Christianity was big in America). They are all about BLM. It doesn't matter that blacks may be committing violence against Asians. Slavish Korean-Americans feel the 'cool deficit' and wanna be cool by being pro-black, thus having 'black cool' rubbed off on them.

    The nature of Korean-America is easy to understand. It is whatever happens to be prevail in American culture. Koreans lack agency and just imitate the Big Power.
    So, Korean Right is all about waving the American Flag and Uncle Sam. and Korean Left is all about imitating BLM and waving the homo flag.
    Asian news says that 80% of SK millennials are 'progressive', only 19% is conservative. Addicted to pop culture, homo propaganda emanating from the US, and American PC that Korean academics pick up and imitate, the future of SK is a mere doglike servility and imitation of whatever happens in America.

    So, Jefferson isn't entirely wrong. Look at the younger generation of Korean-Americans, and they do 'hate' white people. Not because they had bad experiences with whites but because they are slavish imitators. Since US academia and media(that are controlled by Jews) spread anti-white propaganda and agenda all over, it's only natural that Korean-Americans would jump on the bandwagon of anti-white PC. So, even as they prefer to live in white communities and send their kids to white schools, they grow up with PC, MLK worship, rap music, and anti-white cult as their main worldview. Since Koreans don't know how to think for themselves, they just follow the cultural zeitgeist.
    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity. It's because you too are dog-like follower.
  46. @Jefferson
    Does anybody here notice the disproportionate number of Homosexuals in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    The organization was started by 3 Dykes and Deray McKesson the BLM member who ran for mayor of Baltimore is a Gay man.

    Anybody here have a theory as to why LGBT who make up only 3 percent of The U.S population, are found in much higher percentages in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    BLM is a gay movement masquerading as a black one.

    Due to the endless propagandizing of the “civil rights era”, black gays can get more automatic public acceptance by presenting themselves as black rather than gay.

    Read More
  47. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    I suspect the answer from the BLM people to each of your questions will be:

    YOU ARE A RACIST!

    Well just remember if you enter a white neighborhood you are agreeing to be policed by white policeman and white standard of behavior. Don’t like it? Stay in your own part of town.

    Read More
  48. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jefferson
    Does anybody here notice the disproportionate number of Homosexuals in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    The organization was started by 3 Dykes and Deray McKesson the BLM member who ran for mayor of Baltimore is a Gay man.

    Anybody here have a theory as to why LGBT who make up only 3 percent of The U.S population, are found in much higher percentages in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    Because BLM is an expression of cultural marxism (street manifestation of critical theory, where the theory is little more than to destructively criticize), and homosexuals have always been some of the loudest and proudest cultual marxists?

    Read More
  49. Clyde says:
    @Solemnity
    Even if only Black cops policed Black neighborhoods, Blacks would still complain and say that the "Black cops are controlled by the White Establishment".

    Slavery was a huge mistake in many, many ways.

    Even if only Black cops policed Black neighborhoods, Blacks would still complain and say that the “Black cops are controlled by the White Establishment”.

    They can get away with this today. But it would wear thin very quickly if widely implemented. Only black cops policing black communities. Only white cops for white communities.

    Read More
  50. berserker says:

    - Bantustans, is that what BLM wants? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantustan
    - How about an exchange program? South African and Zimbabwean Whites for BLM and its supporters.

    Read More
  51. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Why can’t we bring back segregation? Can we ask BLM since they are calling the shots? I mean on the one hand, they do not want us in their neighborhood (that’s gentrification, and that’s bad) but they do want to be in our neighborhoods and partake of the things we create (and that they cannot create because of racism?). We are not allowed to want to be in their neighborhoods (and improve them) and they are allowed not to want us in theirs. But we are not allowed not to want them in our neighborhoods. If they move into our neighborhoods and ruin them, would we be allowed to move? I would love to have this discussion, and Fred’s, in an open, national forum. Would the New York Times allow that? Would BLM allow that? Or would it just be a gathering where BLM yells at us for an hour and then riots?

    Read More
    • Replies: @dcite
    That would indeed be the discussion to end all discussions on the subject of "racism."
    , @Lurker
    Its difficult to have that discussion for several reasons.

    Only one of which is the almost total lack of interest black people have in engaging in debate online.
  52. Agent76 says:

    No, the Police Don’t Work For You

    Police Have No Duty To Protect Individuals

    Before the mid-1800s, American and British citizens – even in large cities – were expected to protect themselves and each other. Indeed, they were legally required to pursue and attempt to apprehend criminals. The notion of a police force in those days was abhorrent in England and America, where liberals viewed it as a form of the dreaded “standing army.”

    https://www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-protection.html

    CONTINUE DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE: http://CopBlock.org/Library

    Read More
  53. Rehmat says:

    Fred reed, may I suggest you listen to Max Blumenthal why the American White policemen kill Blacks indiscriminately? Blumenthal claims because these killers of non-White minorities were trained by Israeli forces who happened to hate non-White Israelis – Jews or non-Jews.

    “I was most surprised at the banality of the racism and violence that I witnessed and how it’s so widely tolerated because it’s so common. And I’m most surprised that it hasn’t made its way to the American public,” says Blumenthal.

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/10/14/max-blumenthal-on-racism-and-violence-in-israel/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris

    Fred reed, may I suggest you listen to Max Blumenthal why the American White policemen kill Blacks indiscriminately? Blumenthal claims because these killers of non-White minorities were trained by Israeli forces who happened to hate non-White Israelis – Jews or non-Jews.
     
    Maybe you are completely ignorant of history, but we've had racism in America for quite a while now. Way before the existence of Israel, in fact.
    , @asshat
    This is a moronic comment even by your standards.
  54. Wally says: • Website

    We’re ignoring the elephant in the room.

    What low IQ blacks say only matters because the media encourages & promotes attacks on Euros/whites. And everyone knows who dominates the media?

    What we’re seeing here is Jews inciting violence against Euros/whites.

    Who runs the media / entertainment?
    Who runs the Federal Reserve?
    Who runs Wall Street?
    Who owns the US Congress?
    Who owns the White House?
    Who forces acceptance of the fictitious & impossible ’6M & gas chambers’?
    Who dominates ‘academia’?
    Who Runs the Music Business?
    Why is AIPAC the most powerful, dominant lobby, which regularly writes the text of Congressional bills and resolutions?
    Who is it that wants to censor free speech via the “hate speech” canard?
    Who is it that demands we shed the blood of US troops for their interests?
    Who are the real & biggest racists on the planet?

    Read More
  55. Boris says:

    What does BLM want the cop to do?

    How stupid is this Fred Reed guy? The cop should follow proper training in that situation.

    In addition police should stop harassing people just because of their skin color. Stop escalating encounters with no reason. Stop covering up the crimes of other cops. Stop shooting people so quickly.

    Oh, and a tough one: fire the racist morons. They are terrible cops.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88
    Define "racist". Is it any police officer defending his life from a black thug who thinks he has free reign to do as he pleases because he has some type of complex in his head that makes him believe he's impervious to harm due to this "movement"?

    You anti-cop people who call cops racist are hilarious. You know damn well that if someone breaks into your home you will call the police in a heartbeat, and those racist cops will be bringing the negro or other brown person who broke into your house to prison and you'll thank G-d that the racist police were there to save you!!
    , @Stan d Mute

    Oh, and a tough one: fire the racist morons. They are terrible cops.
     
    Good grief. The "racist cop" trope? Has there ever been a more self-evident fallacy? The number of actual racist cops must be pretty close to zero. What racist would take a job where he had to have close daily contact with negroes? Where he could at any moment have to administer CPR to a negro? Where he is required to risk his own life to help negroes? For a real racist, law enforcement has to be just about the worst possible career choice.

    What cops are, almost universally, is "race realist." This too is self-evident. A cop, whether white, negro, Asian, or Latino, lives in a world where those crime statistics are very much up close and personal. If he is unable to determine relative risk between a group of white kids standing on a corner with skateboards and a group of negro kids with pants sagging halfway to their knees, his chances of getting home to see his wife that night are significantly lower. Cops know very well the negro propensity for crime generally and violent crime in particular. That they knowingly spend their days combating negro criminals in negro neighborhoods to protect mostly negro citizens (many of which are overtly hostile to the cops), makes it pretty darn obvious that most cops are almost fanatic negro-lovers willing to risk their own lives and endure mob hostility just to help those few negro civilians who live in those concrete jungles.
  56. Boris says:
    @Rehmat
    Fred reed, may I suggest you listen to Max Blumenthal why the American White policemen kill Blacks indiscriminately? Blumenthal claims because these killers of non-White minorities were trained by Israeli forces who happened to hate non-White Israelis - Jews or non-Jews.

    “I was most surprised at the banality of the racism and violence that I witnessed and how it’s so widely tolerated because it’s so common. And I’m most surprised that it hasn’t made its way to the American public,” says Blumenthal.

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/10/14/max-blumenthal-on-racism-and-violence-in-israel/

    Fred reed, may I suggest you listen to Max Blumenthal why the American White policemen kill Blacks indiscriminately? Blumenthal claims because these killers of non-White minorities were trained by Israeli forces who happened to hate non-White Israelis – Jews or non-Jews.

    Maybe you are completely ignorant of history, but we’ve had racism in America for quite a while now. Way before the existence of Israel, in fact.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    How hilarious - a racist Zionist Jew calling other 'racists'. Why you think Jewish communities were expelled from Christian Europe over 108 times? Well, if your 'holocaust mother' didn't tell you - it was Jewish racism that stopped them integrating with the Christian majority.

    In June 2010, On Thursday, over 100,000 Orthodox Israeli Jews gathered in Jerusalem to show the ugly side of Talmud – not to show their usual hatred toward Jesus, his mother Mary and Christians at large, but racism against their fellow non-European Israeli Jew citizens. These fanatic Zionist Jews were showing their religious contempt for the rest of humanity on Israel’s Supreme Court ruling – forcing the European and Arab Jewish girls to study together at a religious girl school.

    The protesters told Benjamin Netanyahu and its Orthodox parties in the government that parents of European (Ashkenazi) don’t want their ‘White daughters’ to study with Arab (Sephardim) ‘brown girls’ at the girls’ school in the West Bank’s Jewish settlement of Emanuel (perhaps named after Obama’s White House Chief of Staff)......

    https://rehmat1.com/2010/06/18/jewish-racism-against-jews-in-israel/
  57. Ragno says:

    Be aware that a nothing-but-a-President-Trump-can-stop-it-now new li’l reality-changing wrinkle called AFFH is a-comin’; and one of its features will be to be forever make questionnaires like Fred’s not merely a thing of the past but a complete impossibility – and likely a compulsory stay in the pokey for anyone foolish enough to broach the topic in plain sight of Google Earth.

    Read More
  58. Rehmat says:
    @Boris

    Fred reed, may I suggest you listen to Max Blumenthal why the American White policemen kill Blacks indiscriminately? Blumenthal claims because these killers of non-White minorities were trained by Israeli forces who happened to hate non-White Israelis – Jews or non-Jews.
     
    Maybe you are completely ignorant of history, but we've had racism in America for quite a while now. Way before the existence of Israel, in fact.

    How hilarious – a racist Zionist Jew calling other ‘racists’. Why you think Jewish communities were expelled from Christian Europe over 108 times? Well, if your ‘holocaust mother’ didn’t tell you – it was Jewish racism that stopped them integrating with the Christian majority.

    In June 2010, On Thursday, over 100,000 Orthodox Israeli Jews gathered in Jerusalem to show the ugly side of Talmud – not to show their usual hatred toward Jesus, his mother Mary and Christians at large, but racism against their fellow non-European Israeli Jew citizens. These fanatic Zionist Jews were showing their religious contempt for the rest of humanity on Israel’s Supreme Court ruling – forcing the European and Arab Jewish girls to study together at a religious girl school.

    The protesters told Benjamin Netanyahu and its Orthodox parties in the government that parents of European (Ashkenazi) don’t want their ‘White daughters’ to study with Arab (Sephardim) ‘brown girls’ at the girls’ school in the West Bank’s Jewish settlement of Emanuel (perhaps named after Obama’s White House Chief of Staff)……

    https://rehmat1.com/2010/06/18/jewish-racism-against-jews-in-israel/

    Read More
    • Agree: RaceRealist88
    • Replies: @Boris

    Why you think Jewish communities were expelled from Christian Europe over 108 times?
     
    Because of antisemitic moron conspiracy theorists like you, obviously.

    Yes, lots of Jews are racist. The argument that racist Jews tricked white American police officers into being racist is one of the dumbest things I've read on Unz. And that is saying something.
  59. I.W. says:

    The mainstream media as well as banksters and criminal oligarchs need to be held accountable. The basic problem is that we don’t have leadership with any integrity. We don’t have leadership.

    Honest writing is available: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/04/09/the-moral-perversity-and-political-insanity-of-black-lives-matter/

    Read More
  60. dcite says:
    @Astuteobservor II
    BLM is basically fuckers playing victims and wanting others to suffer as they have suffered in their imagination, I would go as far as delusion or being use as leverage for extortion.

    Slavery is over, has been over for 60 years now. yes, I do use the civil rights movement as the end date. But I blame the blacks for everything that happened after the movement. 20 years is enough to turn their lives around. it is enough to build an entire generation of new blacks.

    it seems the only thing the blacks learned for the last 60 years is to have a few loud mouth clowns to stand in front of the media. it is like having a door to a house with no walls or roof.

    60 years? Dating it from the Civil Rights movement? If you are talking about “Jim Crow,” that was in the southern states, and even among them, there was variation in application. There were blacks who were educated and did well even there. There were even blacks, mostly mixed, who owned slaves before 1862.
    In the north, there was no official segregation, or at least little that was mandated by law. There have been black college graduates since the mid-1800s (Howard University, named for Union General Howard) was founded shortly after the Civil War; Oberlin College admitted blacks since its founding in the 1830s.

    The civil rights movement had legitimate motivations, quite frankly. Yes, people of sub-Saharan African descent are not really compatible or assimilatable, for the most part, with persons of European or most Asian descents, but we’re stuck with each other. They’re here because of greedy businessmen of earlier centuries. I think of those greedy slave shippers, Gentile and Jew, as I think of the destructive corporations that have wrought such havoc today. Same mentality. A few make a lot of money and the mass of people who benefitted only tangentially if at all, are left with the nasty consequences, even blamed for them.\
    What was not emphasized enough during the civil rights movement, was that with rights go reponsibilities. They want rights, rights, and more rights, but I don’t know if they ever even think of the word, “responsibility.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @I.W.
    Well said, very well said!
    , @Astuteobservor II
    I think they confused rights to entitlement, think they should get handouts forever.

    that is the same mentality some jews think they can use their jew/holocaust(true or not) card forever.
  61. Boris says:
    @Rehmat
    How hilarious - a racist Zionist Jew calling other 'racists'. Why you think Jewish communities were expelled from Christian Europe over 108 times? Well, if your 'holocaust mother' didn't tell you - it was Jewish racism that stopped them integrating with the Christian majority.

    In June 2010, On Thursday, over 100,000 Orthodox Israeli Jews gathered in Jerusalem to show the ugly side of Talmud – not to show their usual hatred toward Jesus, his mother Mary and Christians at large, but racism against their fellow non-European Israeli Jew citizens. These fanatic Zionist Jews were showing their religious contempt for the rest of humanity on Israel’s Supreme Court ruling – forcing the European and Arab Jewish girls to study together at a religious girl school.

    The protesters told Benjamin Netanyahu and its Orthodox parties in the government that parents of European (Ashkenazi) don’t want their ‘White daughters’ to study with Arab (Sephardim) ‘brown girls’ at the girls’ school in the West Bank’s Jewish settlement of Emanuel (perhaps named after Obama’s White House Chief of Staff)......

    https://rehmat1.com/2010/06/18/jewish-racism-against-jews-in-israel/

    Why you think Jewish communities were expelled from Christian Europe over 108 times?

    Because of antisemitic moron conspiracy theorists like you, obviously.

    Yes, lots of Jews are racist. The argument that racist Jews tricked white American police officers into being racist is one of the dumbest things I’ve read on Unz. And that is saying something.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88
    Yes. Antisemitic conspiracy theorists were responsible for 109 expulsions of the Jews. Are you serious? You know damn well that each and every one of those expulsions was needed. The Jews are parasites, sucking on the lifeblood of a country until they get kicked out and the cycle repeats itself.

    The Jews are the cause for their expulsion over the past 1800 years, not any antisemitic conspiracy theories. To deny the truth is to be willingly ignorant to what the Jews have done to us goyim for thousands of years.
    , @BenKenobi
    Hey now -- we of the unz commentariat may be a despicable lot of cads, mountebanks, and ne'er-do-wells -- but don't you dare lump that fuckin' Martian rehmat in with us!
    , @Rehmat
    Let us see who is the dumbest person - you who believes that Wailing Wall was part of the destroyed Jewish Temple Mount or I who believe the wall was part of a Roman fortress?

    Well, last month UNESCO agreed with my view and called you a MORON.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/04/18/unesco-the-western-wall-is-not-jewish/
  62. dcite says:
    @Anonymous
    Why can't we bring back segregation? Can we ask BLM since they are calling the shots? I mean on the one hand, they do not want us in their neighborhood (that's gentrification, and that's bad) but they do want to be in our neighborhoods and partake of the things we create (and that they cannot create because of racism?). We are not allowed to want to be in their neighborhoods (and improve them) and they are allowed not to want us in theirs. But we are not allowed not to want them in our neighborhoods. If they move into our neighborhoods and ruin them, would we be allowed to move? I would love to have this discussion, and Fred's, in an open, national forum. Would the New York Times allow that? Would BLM allow that? Or would it just be a gathering where BLM yells at us for an hour and then riots?

    That would indeed be the discussion to end all discussions on the subject of “racism.”

    Read More
  63. @Jefferson
    "this in-group out-group thinking is probably evolutionary useful. Inter-group violence has the potential to become an existential thread, while I have never heard of a people who disappeared because of intra-group, criminal violence."

    On average around 5,000 thousand Black men disappear from this country each year because of Black on Black murder. So don't give me that shit.

    You are an epic fail trying to compare the rare White on Black homicide to the disapppearance genocide of the Black race. There is reason why White on Black murder is compared to man bites dog.

    White on Black murder would be even more miniscule if Mixed Race Hispanics who murder Blacks did not statistically count as White on Black murder.

    “On average around 5,000 thousand Black men disappear from this country each year because of Black on Black murder.”

    In ‘Big Man’ societies, the ones who survive the slaughter impregnate twenty or thirty women. Those other guys were superfluous in regards to producing the next generation.

    Read More
  64. @Jefferson
    "Hispanics and Asians hate blacks."

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.

    I’m a white American / European-American and very proud of it. My Asian wife would be surprised to hear that she hates me. Our very American and apolitical Asian friends don’t hate me either. The fault line in dire times will be Africans against whites and Asians (and hopefully Mexicans) wherever the latter are threatened or live concentrations of Africans, not white versus Asian for the most part.

    There’s anti-white animus among arrogant Asians to some extent in the USA, for sure, but Asians are often “reachable” and amenable to a way of life more like ours. In a situation of prolonged rioting or mob attacks, which will surely be or become racially delineated, Asians even more so will need the remaining whites for either of them to survive, and vice versa.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "My Asian wife would be surprised to hear that she hates me."

    Isn't there no deception in the sushi, kimchi, or dimsum?
  65. I.W. says:
    @dcite
    60 years? Dating it from the Civil Rights movement? If you are talking about "Jim Crow," that was in the southern states, and even among them, there was variation in application. There were blacks who were educated and did well even there. There were even blacks, mostly mixed, who owned slaves before 1862.
    In the north, there was no official segregation, or at least little that was mandated by law. There have been black college graduates since the mid-1800s (Howard University, named for Union General Howard) was founded shortly after the Civil War; Oberlin College admitted blacks since its founding in the 1830s.

    The civil rights movement had legitimate motivations, quite frankly. Yes, people of sub-Saharan African descent are not really compatible or assimilatable, for the most part, with persons of European or most Asian descents, but we're stuck with each other. They're here because of greedy businessmen of earlier centuries. I think of those greedy slave shippers, Gentile and Jew, as I think of the destructive corporations that have wrought such havoc today. Same mentality. A few make a lot of money and the mass of people who benefitted only tangentially if at all, are left with the nasty consequences, even blamed for them.\
    What was not emphasized enough during the civil rights movement, was that with rights go reponsibilities. They want rights, rights, and more rights, but I don't know if they ever even think of the word, "responsibility."

    Well said, very well said!

    Read More
  66. @Boris

    Why you think Jewish communities were expelled from Christian Europe over 108 times?
     
    Because of antisemitic moron conspiracy theorists like you, obviously.

    Yes, lots of Jews are racist. The argument that racist Jews tricked white American police officers into being racist is one of the dumbest things I've read on Unz. And that is saying something.

    Yes. Antisemitic conspiracy theorists were responsible for 109 expulsions of the Jews. Are you serious? You know damn well that each and every one of those expulsions was needed. The Jews are parasites, sucking on the lifeblood of a country until they get kicked out and the cycle repeats itself.

    The Jews are the cause for their expulsion over the past 1800 years, not any antisemitic conspiracy theories. To deny the truth is to be willingly ignorant to what the Jews have done to us goyim for thousands of years.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris
    Look, Nazis such as yourself believe the stupid conspiracy theories. I mean, you could never be responsible for your own miserable life. Your failure must be because some Jews got together in black robes and drank gentile blood. Or something. I can't be expected to keep up with the stupid things you believe.
    , @Stan d Mute

    The Jews are the cause for their expulsion over the past 1800 years, not any antisemitic conspiracy theories. To deny the truth is to be willingly ignorant to what the Jews have done to us goyim for thousands of years.
     
    At minimum, they've given provocation to their hosts. I'm sure that many times it was an innocent provocation where the Jews didn't do anything wrong per se, but had the unfortunate circumstance of being visibly successful in a time of general failure. To claim the Jews have always been innocent victims is really an outrageous insult to the Jews - as if they are such powerless and incompetent people that they are simply blown to and fro by the winds of happenstance.

    The root of the Jews troubles is their very deliberate master plan to always remain outside and apart of whatever host society has welcomed them. They advertise their arrogant belief in their own racial superiority ("Chosen by Yahweh!") and nobody is allowed to join their special club that confers exclusive benefits only upon themselves. This is a universal recipe for inviting hostility in every society and culture on the planet. And the more visibly successful they are in any society relative to the overall success of the host, the more hostility will be created whether the host is actually benefiting from their presence or not. It's hard to see how the persistence of this behavior helps the Jews when it has such predictable outcome, but apparently creating the enmity forces the Jews into closer ingroup bonds enough to outweigh the hostility and danger they invite upon themselves.
  67. @Boris

    What does BLM want the cop to do?
     
    How stupid is this Fred Reed guy? The cop should follow proper training in that situation.

    In addition police should stop harassing people just because of their skin color. Stop escalating encounters with no reason. Stop covering up the crimes of other cops. Stop shooting people so quickly.

    Oh, and a tough one: fire the racist morons. They are terrible cops.

    Define “racist”. Is it any police officer defending his life from a black thug who thinks he has free reign to do as he pleases because he has some type of complex in his head that makes him believe he’s impervious to harm due to this “movement”?

    You anti-cop people who call cops racist are hilarious. You know damn well that if someone breaks into your home you will call the police in a heartbeat, and those racist cops will be bringing the negro or other brown person who broke into your house to prison and you’ll thank G-d that the racist police were there to save you!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris

    Define “racist”.
     
    In terms of police officers, any LEO who consciously treats an individual differently because of race. (unconscious bias is a problem too. Good training can remove it, however.)


    Is it any police officer defending his life from a black thug who thinks he has free reign to do as he pleases because he has some type of complex in his head that makes him believe he’s impervious to harm due to this “movement”?
     
    Of course not. Also, it's bizarre to think that pointing out how police are quick to shoot black people would make some "black thug" think he is "impervious."

    You anti-cop people who call cops racist are hilarious.
     
    I call racist cops racist. I like non-racist cops, although I am not a fan when they protect their racist cop friends.
  68. Boris says:
    @RaceRealist88
    Yes. Antisemitic conspiracy theorists were responsible for 109 expulsions of the Jews. Are you serious? You know damn well that each and every one of those expulsions was needed. The Jews are parasites, sucking on the lifeblood of a country until they get kicked out and the cycle repeats itself.

    The Jews are the cause for their expulsion over the past 1800 years, not any antisemitic conspiracy theories. To deny the truth is to be willingly ignorant to what the Jews have done to us goyim for thousands of years.

    Look, Nazis such as yourself believe the stupid conspiracy theories. I mean, you could never be responsible for your own miserable life. Your failure must be because some Jews got together in black robes and drank gentile blood. Or something. I can’t be expected to keep up with the stupid things you believe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88

    I mean, you could never be responsible for your own miserable life. Your failure must be because some Jews got together in black robes and drank gentile blood. Or something. I can’t be expected to keep up with the stupid things you believe.
     
    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others "because I'm a failure"? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am.

    It's stupid noticing who has the most power in the US media? Or how about the certain ethnic group you're not allowed to speak about or you're planning anuda shoah?

    Fact of the matter is this. The Jews have put a strangle hold on discourse, to keep the goyim blind. If you want to laugh and make jokes about it, good on you. Just know that the goyim DO know and one day we will kick the Jews out for the 110th time.
  69. @Boris
    Look, Nazis such as yourself believe the stupid conspiracy theories. I mean, you could never be responsible for your own miserable life. Your failure must be because some Jews got together in black robes and drank gentile blood. Or something. I can't be expected to keep up with the stupid things you believe.

    I mean, you could never be responsible for your own miserable life. Your failure must be because some Jews got together in black robes and drank gentile blood. Or something. I can’t be expected to keep up with the stupid things you believe.

    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others “because I’m a failure”? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am.

    It’s stupid noticing who has the most power in the US media? Or how about the certain ethnic group you’re not allowed to speak about or you’re planning anuda shoah?

    Fact of the matter is this. The Jews have put a strangle hold on discourse, to keep the goyim blind. If you want to laugh and make jokes about it, good on you. Just know that the goyim DO know and one day we will kick the Jews out for the 110th time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris

    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others “because I’m a failure”? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am.
     
    I have no idea why you believe the stupid things you believe. Just going with the most probable explanation.
    , @asshat


    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others “because I’m a failure”? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am

     

    the 88 in your name is an almost sure sign that you're an idiot.
    Now I know I'm generalizing, but the two are pretty correlated.
    You'd know all about that since youre a race realist not a white dindu complaining as usual, right?
  70. Boris says:
    @RaceRealist88
    Define "racist". Is it any police officer defending his life from a black thug who thinks he has free reign to do as he pleases because he has some type of complex in his head that makes him believe he's impervious to harm due to this "movement"?

    You anti-cop people who call cops racist are hilarious. You know damn well that if someone breaks into your home you will call the police in a heartbeat, and those racist cops will be bringing the negro or other brown person who broke into your house to prison and you'll thank G-d that the racist police were there to save you!!

    Define “racist”.

    In terms of police officers, any LEO who consciously treats an individual differently because of race. (unconscious bias is a problem too. Good training can remove it, however.)

    Is it any police officer defending his life from a black thug who thinks he has free reign to do as he pleases because he has some type of complex in his head that makes him believe he’s impervious to harm due to this “movement”?

    Of course not. Also, it’s bizarre to think that pointing out how police are quick to shoot black people would make some “black thug” think he is “impervious.”

    You anti-cop people who call cops racist are hilarious.

    I call racist cops racist. I like non-racist cops, although I am not a fan when they protect their racist cop friends.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88

    In terms of police officers, any LEO who consciously treats an individual differently because of race. (unconscious bias is a problem too. Good training can remove it, however.)
     
    Do you think stereotypes just popped up out of thin air one day? That one day a police officer wakes up and says he's going to kill him a negro? Do you think the there is no basis to stereotypes and therefore police shouldn't be more alert around negro and Hispanics than Whites and Asians? Stereotypes exist for a reason, whether you think those reasons are "racist" or not.

    Of course not. Also, it’s bizarre to think that pointing out how police are quick to shoot black people would make some “black thug” think he is “impervious.”
     
    With the way that anti-police people see it, any time a cop uses his weapon on a minority it's for a "racist" reason. When I said impervious I meant due to the attempted stranglehold that BLM and other like groups have attempted to have over political discourse.

    I call racist cops racist. I like non-racist cops, although I am not a fan when they protect their racist cop friends.
     
    Who are "racist cops"? Is Darren Wilson a racist? Slager? Any other high profile (justified) police killing? Are they all "racists"?

    It seems whenever a cop rightfully protects his life the same thing happens. The do-nothing low life thugs of BLM and other leftist communist groups come out of left field and attempt to get the officer to resign or get him fired. Anything that a white police officer does to a non-white seems to be injustice to these groups, facts be damned.

    Get with reality. Police have the right to protect themselves against crazed thugs and no amount of name-calling from the Left will change that.

  71. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website

    Liberal Urbanites are total hypocrites who talk ‘anti-racism’ but practice ‘racism’.

    Hypocrisy or Libocrisy defines what they are. They are Libocrites.

    Read More
  72. @Boris

    Define “racist”.
     
    In terms of police officers, any LEO who consciously treats an individual differently because of race. (unconscious bias is a problem too. Good training can remove it, however.)


    Is it any police officer defending his life from a black thug who thinks he has free reign to do as he pleases because he has some type of complex in his head that makes him believe he’s impervious to harm due to this “movement”?
     
    Of course not. Also, it's bizarre to think that pointing out how police are quick to shoot black people would make some "black thug" think he is "impervious."

    You anti-cop people who call cops racist are hilarious.
     
    I call racist cops racist. I like non-racist cops, although I am not a fan when they protect their racist cop friends.

    In terms of police officers, any LEO who consciously treats an individual differently because of race. (unconscious bias is a problem too. Good training can remove it, however.)

    Do you think stereotypes just popped up out of thin air one day? That one day a police officer wakes up and says he’s going to kill him a negro? Do you think the there is no basis to stereotypes and therefore police shouldn’t be more alert around negro and Hispanics than Whites and Asians? Stereotypes exist for a reason, whether you think those reasons are “racist” or not.

    Of course not. Also, it’s bizarre to think that pointing out how police are quick to shoot black people would make some “black thug” think he is “impervious.”

    With the way that anti-police people see it, any time a cop uses his weapon on a minority it’s for a “racist” reason. When I said impervious I meant due to the attempted stranglehold that BLM and other like groups have attempted to have over political discourse.

    I call racist cops racist. I like non-racist cops, although I am not a fan when they protect their racist cop friends.

    Who are “racist cops”? Is Darren Wilson a racist? Slager? Any other high profile (justified) police killing? Are they all “racists”?

    It seems whenever a cop rightfully protects his life the same thing happens. The do-nothing low life thugs of BLM and other leftist communist groups come out of left field and attempt to get the officer to resign or get him fired. Anything that a white police officer does to a non-white seems to be injustice to these groups, facts be damned.

    Get with reality. Police have the right to protect themselves against crazed thugs and no amount of name-calling from the Left will change that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris

    Do you think the there is no basis to stereotypes and therefore police shouldn’t be more alert around negro and Hispanics than Whites and Asians?
     
    Try thinking through this one time. Should cops be less alert around white people? Seems like a great way to get killed by a white person. Stereotypes are useless when it comes to good police work.

    Who are “racist cops”?
     
    Lots of cops have been busted using racial slurs. They are racists. I don't know about the others, but they likely at least have some sort of implicit bias. Also, they are terrible police officers. Terrible police officers should be fired--before they kill people, if possible.


    Police have the right to protect themselves against crazed thugs
     
    You haven't been paying attention. Eric Garner and Freddy Gray were killed when they weren't threats. Others who were real or perceived threats (Laquan McDonald, Tamir Rice) were handled terribly by terrible officers.
  73. Boris says:
    @RaceRealist88

    I mean, you could never be responsible for your own miserable life. Your failure must be because some Jews got together in black robes and drank gentile blood. Or something. I can’t be expected to keep up with the stupid things you believe.
     
    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others "because I'm a failure"? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am.

    It's stupid noticing who has the most power in the US media? Or how about the certain ethnic group you're not allowed to speak about or you're planning anuda shoah?

    Fact of the matter is this. The Jews have put a strangle hold on discourse, to keep the goyim blind. If you want to laugh and make jokes about it, good on you. Just know that the goyim DO know and one day we will kick the Jews out for the 110th time.

    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others “because I’m a failure”? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am.

    I have no idea why you believe the stupid things you believe. Just going with the most probable explanation.

    Read More
  74. Saw plenty of Asian Trump supporters at the Lynden rally yesterday.

    Read More
  75. BenKenobi says:
    @Boris

    Why you think Jewish communities were expelled from Christian Europe over 108 times?
     
    Because of antisemitic moron conspiracy theorists like you, obviously.

    Yes, lots of Jews are racist. The argument that racist Jews tricked white American police officers into being racist is one of the dumbest things I've read on Unz. And that is saying something.

    Hey now — we of the unz commentariat may be a despicable lot of cads, mountebanks, and ne’er-do-wells — but don’t you dare lump that fuckin’ Martian rehmat in with us!

    Read More
  76. @Twinkie

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.
     
    That's an utter nonsense. Housing and residential patterns show that Asians integrate far better with whites than blacks do (Hispanics are in-between).

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes.
     
    Hispanics are, yes (except Cubans). Asians vary depending on country of origin and time period. During some elections they vote for Democrats; in others they vote Republican. Koreans and Vietnamese tend to vote Republican while Indians vote heavily for Democrats.

    They are not the new Italians and Irish.
     
    Those groups voted heavily for corrupt machine politics early in their immigrant histories.

    They are not culturally assimilating into White America.
     
    The Manhattan Institute has been studying assimilation of major immigrant groups for a number of years now. Culturally, Filipinos, Vietnamese, Koreans, and Cubans assimilate at high rates. Indians, Chinese, and Mexicans do so at low rates.

    Hispanics are, yes (except Cubans).

    This is changing. Cubans used to be dependable republicans. Not so much today. Miami-Dade County is ground zero for Cubans and is today pretty reliably Democrat. It’s not a seamless fit however, as Tom Wolfe noted in his Back to Blood, the Cubans have zero compassion for the American negroes, Haitians, and Jamaicans. Also, the Cubans have drawn in behind them a large and growing population of Central Americans due to predominance of Spanish over English. We also see some real strongholds like Weston in Broward County now called colloquially “Westonzuela” for all the Venezuelans. Colombians have blended a bit better along the lines of Guatemalans, Nicaraguans, and Salvadorans. About all that’s missing is a large Mexican population (disliked intensely by all other Central Americans as well as Cubans), Chileans, and Argentines. And of course as the financial capital of Latin America, Miami (Brickell and East of Biscayne Blvd) and Miami Beach are chock full of the wealthiest elites from all Latin America (and even Spain).

    Anyway, the point, again, was that the negroes are unwanted and disliked by all the Latinos regardless of origin and despite the Cuban shift from republican to democrat party. Old school Cubans are still strongly republican, but younger Cubans are voting with the other Latino groups.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Old school Cubans are still strongly republican, but younger Cubans are voting with the other Latino groups.
     
    Yes, this is true, but not only limited to Cubans. The trend among the young, regardless of race or ethnicity, is toward the Democrats of late.
  77. rod1963 says:
    @Jefferson
    "Hispanics and Asians hate blacks."

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.

    Hispanics do not like blacks period.

    In Los Angeles, there is a well known phenomena of ethnic cleansing of blacks from Hispanic neighborhoods. They’ll have a Mexican gang member kill a few black bucks to send a message to the rest to leave and they do. The LAPD is fully aware of it but can’t do or say anything about it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "Hispanics do not like blacks period."

    Hispanics do not like Whites period.

    " Los Angeles, there is a well known phenomena of ethnic cleansing of blacks from Hispanic neighborhoods"

    In Los Angeles there is a well known phenomenon of racial cleansing of Whites by Hispanics. Los Angeles did not always look like Mexico. At one time Los Angeles was a Whitopia.

    A lot of the the Mexican neighborhoods in Los Angeles today at one time used to have a sea of blondes, but no more.
  78. @Boris

    What does BLM want the cop to do?
     
    How stupid is this Fred Reed guy? The cop should follow proper training in that situation.

    In addition police should stop harassing people just because of their skin color. Stop escalating encounters with no reason. Stop covering up the crimes of other cops. Stop shooting people so quickly.

    Oh, and a tough one: fire the racist morons. They are terrible cops.

    Oh, and a tough one: fire the racist morons. They are terrible cops.

    Good grief. The “racist cop” trope? Has there ever been a more self-evident fallacy? The number of actual racist cops must be pretty close to zero. What racist would take a job where he had to have close daily contact with negroes? Where he could at any moment have to administer CPR to a negro? Where he is required to risk his own life to help negroes? For a real racist, law enforcement has to be just about the worst possible career choice.

    What cops are, almost universally, is “race realist.” This too is self-evident. A cop, whether white, negro, Asian, or Latino, lives in a world where those crime statistics are very much up close and personal. If he is unable to determine relative risk between a group of white kids standing on a corner with skateboards and a group of negro kids with pants sagging halfway to their knees, his chances of getting home to see his wife that night are significantly lower. Cops know very well the negro propensity for crime generally and violent crime in particular. That they knowingly spend their days combating negro criminals in negro neighborhoods to protect mostly negro citizens (many of which are overtly hostile to the cops), makes it pretty darn obvious that most cops are almost fanatic negro-lovers willing to risk their own lives and endure mob hostility just to help those few negro civilians who live in those concrete jungles.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris

    What racist would take a job where he had to have close daily contact with negroes?
     
    A racist who wants power over "negroes"? A racist with dim employment prospects (i. e. most racists)?


    What cops are, almost universally, is “race realist.”
     
    Same thing.

    pretty darn obvious that most cops are almost fanatic negro-lovers willing to risk their own lives and endure mob hostility
     
    lol
    , @dcite
    Boris seems to be a bubble boy with a BLM badge. Drop him off in the middle of black Baltimore hood and let him report back.
    btw, the policeman most "guilty" in the Freddi Gray incident was black.

    It's a contrived narrative. Interracial crime is overwhelmingly black on white. Boris really needs to address that racism before he has any credibility. The occasional epithet a white cop may utter is nothing compared to what they face. Blacks utter quite a few epithets of their own.

    That some SJW can base his argument on the possible uttering of a word, rather than on the rivers of blood and destroyed metropolises, is ... interesting. Shows their desperation to keep the game going.
  79. @dcite
    60 years? Dating it from the Civil Rights movement? If you are talking about "Jim Crow," that was in the southern states, and even among them, there was variation in application. There were blacks who were educated and did well even there. There were even blacks, mostly mixed, who owned slaves before 1862.
    In the north, there was no official segregation, or at least little that was mandated by law. There have been black college graduates since the mid-1800s (Howard University, named for Union General Howard) was founded shortly after the Civil War; Oberlin College admitted blacks since its founding in the 1830s.

    The civil rights movement had legitimate motivations, quite frankly. Yes, people of sub-Saharan African descent are not really compatible or assimilatable, for the most part, with persons of European or most Asian descents, but we're stuck with each other. They're here because of greedy businessmen of earlier centuries. I think of those greedy slave shippers, Gentile and Jew, as I think of the destructive corporations that have wrought such havoc today. Same mentality. A few make a lot of money and the mass of people who benefitted only tangentially if at all, are left with the nasty consequences, even blamed for them.\
    What was not emphasized enough during the civil rights movement, was that with rights go reponsibilities. They want rights, rights, and more rights, but I don't know if they ever even think of the word, "responsibility."

    I think they confused rights to entitlement, think they should get handouts forever.

    that is the same mentality some jews think they can use their jew/holocaust(true or not) card forever.

    Read More
  80. @RaceRealist88
    Yes. Antisemitic conspiracy theorists were responsible for 109 expulsions of the Jews. Are you serious? You know damn well that each and every one of those expulsions was needed. The Jews are parasites, sucking on the lifeblood of a country until they get kicked out and the cycle repeats itself.

    The Jews are the cause for their expulsion over the past 1800 years, not any antisemitic conspiracy theories. To deny the truth is to be willingly ignorant to what the Jews have done to us goyim for thousands of years.

    The Jews are the cause for their expulsion over the past 1800 years, not any antisemitic conspiracy theories. To deny the truth is to be willingly ignorant to what the Jews have done to us goyim for thousands of years.

    At minimum, they’ve given provocation to their hosts. I’m sure that many times it was an innocent provocation where the Jews didn’t do anything wrong per se, but had the unfortunate circumstance of being visibly successful in a time of general failure. To claim the Jews have always been innocent victims is really an outrageous insult to the Jews – as if they are such powerless and incompetent people that they are simply blown to and fro by the winds of happenstance.

    The root of the Jews troubles is their very deliberate master plan to always remain outside and apart of whatever host society has welcomed them. They advertise their arrogant belief in their own racial superiority (“Chosen by Yahweh!”) and nobody is allowed to join their special club that confers exclusive benefits only upon themselves. This is a universal recipe for inviting hostility in every society and culture on the planet. And the more visibly successful they are in any society relative to the overall success of the host, the more hostility will be created whether the host is actually benefiting from their presence or not. It’s hard to see how the persistence of this behavior helps the Jews when it has such predictable outcome, but apparently creating the enmity forces the Jews into closer ingroup bonds enough to outweigh the hostility and danger they invite upon themselves.

    Read More
  81. @Twinkie

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.
     
    That's an utter nonsense. Housing and residential patterns show that Asians integrate far better with whites than blacks do (Hispanics are in-between).

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes.
     
    Hispanics are, yes (except Cubans). Asians vary depending on country of origin and time period. During some elections they vote for Democrats; in others they vote Republican. Koreans and Vietnamese tend to vote Republican while Indians vote heavily for Democrats.

    They are not the new Italians and Irish.
     
    Those groups voted heavily for corrupt machine politics early in their immigrant histories.

    They are not culturally assimilating into White America.
     
    The Manhattan Institute has been studying assimilation of major immigrant groups for a number of years now. Culturally, Filipinos, Vietnamese, Koreans, and Cubans assimilate at high rates. Indians, Chinese, and Mexicans do so at low rates.

    I think a lot more Mexicans would assimilate if we would stop mollycoddling them and tell them in no uncertain terms that they will not be allowed to play the victim card.

    My job requires me to visit many different neighborhoods. From the ground level, I get to see everything from the $2 million mansion homes to the places you wouldn’t want to get caught in after dark. Many of the older suburban neighborhoods—the places that once nestled young White families 40 years ago—are now overrun by Hispanics, with a few Asians (mostly Hmong or Laotian, I’m guessing, from the names) and the elderly White remnant living among them. It’s one of the unmistakable symptoms of a neighborhood in decline.

    But I’m continually impressed by how “normal” the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans—the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar—but the kids are delightful. They all speak English, usually without any trace of a Cholo accent. They may be bilingual, but they seem to have very little interest in speaking Spanish. And they want to wear the same clothes, eat the same foods, play the same video games, and watch the same TV shows as as all the White children of comparable age. A few years later, when they become teenagers, the girls like to flaunt their figures in Lululemon halter tops and listen to club music. Not exactly the wisest choices in and of themselves, but it’s the same thing the young White girls are doing, which was my point.

    Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable. The single biggest factor preventing them from doing so is the White liberal culture that wants to “raise Hispanic consciousness” by first deliberately creating an identity ghetto for these people and then by attaching perks for those who maintain such an identity. Absent that, Mexican assimilation would go much quicker and smoother, for they do not seem to possess the inherent incapacity for White society as, for example, the Blacks do.

    By the way, none of this should be taken to mean that I want any more Mexicans in the USA. I am pro-Trump and pro-Wall. But I think we could do a much better job with the Mexicans already here by simply dropping the victimization game.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable."

    When they remain a Gomezian minority. But when they turn into a Fuentesian majority, they get all macho and give middle finger to gringo and imitate Negroes.

    Its like your stomach can digest a taco, or two tacos or even three. But if you shove 50 tacos into your stomach, it's just gonna explode and turn totally taco.
    Your stomach can digest only so many tacos.
    US can assimilate only so many non-white minorities.

    , @Jefferson
    "But I’m continually impressed by how “normal” the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans—the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar—but the kids are delightful."

    The kids are delightful? Even though statistics prove that American born Hispanics commit more crime and are more likely to join street gangs than Fresh Off The Boat Hispanics. Also American born Hispanics on average do not have the same strong work ethic as their immigrant parents. American born Hispanics tend to adopt the lazyness culture of Dindu Nuffins. Haven't you notice that most Hispanic gangbangers in The U.S are fluent in English and that is because most of them were either born here or came here when they were little. If you see a Hispanic in Boyle Heights Los Angeles for example with tattoos covering his entire neck while driving a 64 lowrider, he most likely knows how to speak English. He has culturally adopted the African American gangsta lifestyle, he is not culturally assimilating into Whiteness.

    It's similar to Muslims in Western countries. European and American born Muslims are more likely to be religious radicals than their immigrant parents.
    , @RadicalCenter
    Sounds like you live in SoCal? We live right in Los Angeles and have a somewhat more negative impression of those supposedly charming Mexican kids. They very often are speaking Spanish -- can't and don't read all that much in English -- and are a bunch of rude, rough little grunts on the playgrounds with our kids. They also act and dress wigger, whatever the mex equivalent is, by the time they reach pre-teen years.
    , @Twinkie

    Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable.
     
    Regardless of how they seem to you, the statistics are pretty clear. Mexicans assimilate poorly in all three aspects of assimilation as defined by the Manhattan Institute, namely, economic, cultural, and civic. That has not change for a very long time. And tragically for all of us Americans, their progeny in the United States continue to lag other scions of other immigrant groups. In fact, their crime rate is something like seven times higher than that of their immigrant forefathers.

    The single biggest factor preventing them from doing so is the White liberal culture that wants to “raise Hispanic consciousness”
     
    Or it could be the fact that the Mexicans immigrants, by and large, are low IQ rural peasants or urban underclass.

    But I think we could do a much better job with the Mexicans already here by simply dropping the victimization game.
     
    I agree there. Drop affirmative action and insist on English and assimilation, period.
  82. Lurker says:
    @WorkingClass
    I'm a working class white guy living in a majority black city in the deep south. I know a lot of black people who work for a living and are not criminals. They don't like the gang bangers any more than I do. They are the victims of black on black crime. I live in a mixed neighborhood which is less dangerous than the all black neighborhoods. Still, the swat teams here manage to break into the wrong address and shoot the wrong people. The police are the only thing keeping the gangs of thugs down. But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.

    Black Lives Matter is funded, I am told, by Mr. Soros. What I would tell BLM is they are being used to exacerbate racial strife in America. Keeping black and white at each others throats is public policy. What I would tell comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer, is that police brutality and criminality are real. That the war on drugs with its vast gulag of jails and prisons is real.

    We all have a common enemy. The Police State and the scumbags who own it. We will have neither liberty nor peace and prosperity until we unite against our oppressors. Not BLM. Not Mexicans. Not queers or feminists or cry babies on campus. Not white racists or red necks. But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    Anti-semite!

    Read More
  83. Boris says:
    @RaceRealist88

    In terms of police officers, any LEO who consciously treats an individual differently because of race. (unconscious bias is a problem too. Good training can remove it, however.)
     
    Do you think stereotypes just popped up out of thin air one day? That one day a police officer wakes up and says he's going to kill him a negro? Do you think the there is no basis to stereotypes and therefore police shouldn't be more alert around negro and Hispanics than Whites and Asians? Stereotypes exist for a reason, whether you think those reasons are "racist" or not.

    Of course not. Also, it’s bizarre to think that pointing out how police are quick to shoot black people would make some “black thug” think he is “impervious.”
     
    With the way that anti-police people see it, any time a cop uses his weapon on a minority it's for a "racist" reason. When I said impervious I meant due to the attempted stranglehold that BLM and other like groups have attempted to have over political discourse.

    I call racist cops racist. I like non-racist cops, although I am not a fan when they protect their racist cop friends.
     
    Who are "racist cops"? Is Darren Wilson a racist? Slager? Any other high profile (justified) police killing? Are they all "racists"?

    It seems whenever a cop rightfully protects his life the same thing happens. The do-nothing low life thugs of BLM and other leftist communist groups come out of left field and attempt to get the officer to resign or get him fired. Anything that a white police officer does to a non-white seems to be injustice to these groups, facts be damned.

    Get with reality. Police have the right to protect themselves against crazed thugs and no amount of name-calling from the Left will change that.

    Do you think the there is no basis to stereotypes and therefore police shouldn’t be more alert around negro and Hispanics than Whites and Asians?

    Try thinking through this one time. Should cops be less alert around white people? Seems like a great way to get killed by a white person. Stereotypes are useless when it comes to good police work.

    Who are “racist cops”?

    Lots of cops have been busted using racial slurs. They are racists. I don’t know about the others, but they likely at least have some sort of implicit bias. Also, they are terrible police officers. Terrible police officers should be fired–before they kill people, if possible.

    Police have the right to protect themselves against crazed thugs

    You haven’t been paying attention. Eric Garner and Freddy Gray were killed when they weren’t threats. Others who were real or perceived threats (Laquan McDonald, Tamir Rice) were handled terribly by terrible officers.

    Read More
  84. Lurker says:
    @Anonymous
    Why can't we bring back segregation? Can we ask BLM since they are calling the shots? I mean on the one hand, they do not want us in their neighborhood (that's gentrification, and that's bad) but they do want to be in our neighborhoods and partake of the things we create (and that they cannot create because of racism?). We are not allowed to want to be in their neighborhoods (and improve them) and they are allowed not to want us in theirs. But we are not allowed not to want them in our neighborhoods. If they move into our neighborhoods and ruin them, would we be allowed to move? I would love to have this discussion, and Fred's, in an open, national forum. Would the New York Times allow that? Would BLM allow that? Or would it just be a gathering where BLM yells at us for an hour and then riots?

    Its difficult to have that discussion for several reasons.

    Only one of which is the almost total lack of interest black people have in engaging in debate online.

    Read More
  85. Boris says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Oh, and a tough one: fire the racist morons. They are terrible cops.
     
    Good grief. The "racist cop" trope? Has there ever been a more self-evident fallacy? The number of actual racist cops must be pretty close to zero. What racist would take a job where he had to have close daily contact with negroes? Where he could at any moment have to administer CPR to a negro? Where he is required to risk his own life to help negroes? For a real racist, law enforcement has to be just about the worst possible career choice.

    What cops are, almost universally, is "race realist." This too is self-evident. A cop, whether white, negro, Asian, or Latino, lives in a world where those crime statistics are very much up close and personal. If he is unable to determine relative risk between a group of white kids standing on a corner with skateboards and a group of negro kids with pants sagging halfway to their knees, his chances of getting home to see his wife that night are significantly lower. Cops know very well the negro propensity for crime generally and violent crime in particular. That they knowingly spend their days combating negro criminals in negro neighborhoods to protect mostly negro citizens (many of which are overtly hostile to the cops), makes it pretty darn obvious that most cops are almost fanatic negro-lovers willing to risk their own lives and endure mob hostility just to help those few negro civilians who live in those concrete jungles.

    What racist would take a job where he had to have close daily contact with negroes?

    A racist who wants power over “negroes”? A racist with dim employment prospects (i. e. most racists)?

    What cops are, almost universally, is “race realist.”

    Same thing.

    pretty darn obvious that most cops are almost fanatic negro-lovers willing to risk their own lives and endure mob hostility

    lol

    Read More
  86. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website

    Reparation and Separation. That would be best.

    But too many white boys worship bigass Negroes and too many white girls are infected with jungalo fever.
    Also, so many whites are addicted to rap and reggae.
    And, so many whites worship at the altar of the Magic Negro of the Tubman and MLK myth.

    We must smash the idols. MLK was just another Sharpton.

    Read More
  87. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @Intelligent Dasein
    I think a lot more Mexicans would assimilate if we would stop mollycoddling them and tell them in no uncertain terms that they will not be allowed to play the victim card.

    My job requires me to visit many different neighborhoods. From the ground level, I get to see everything from the $2 million mansion homes to the places you wouldn't want to get caught in after dark. Many of the older suburban neighborhoods---the places that once nestled young White families 40 years ago---are now overrun by Hispanics, with a few Asians (mostly Hmong or Laotian, I'm guessing, from the names) and the elderly White remnant living among them. It's one of the unmistakable symptoms of a neighborhood in decline.

    But I'm continually impressed by how "normal" the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans---the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar---but the kids are delightful. They all speak English, usually without any trace of a Cholo accent. They may be bilingual, but they seem to have very little interest in speaking Spanish. And they want to wear the same clothes, eat the same foods, play the same video games, and watch the same TV shows as as all the White children of comparable age. A few years later, when they become teenagers, the girls like to flaunt their figures in Lululemon halter tops and listen to club music. Not exactly the wisest choices in and of themselves, but it's the same thing the young White girls are doing, which was my point.

    Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable. The single biggest factor preventing them from doing so is the White liberal culture that wants to "raise Hispanic consciousness" by first deliberately creating an identity ghetto for these people and then by attaching perks for those who maintain such an identity. Absent that, Mexican assimilation would go much quicker and smoother, for they do not seem to possess the inherent incapacity for White society as, for example, the Blacks do.

    By the way, none of this should be taken to mean that I want any more Mexicans in the USA. I am pro-Trump and pro-Wall. But I think we could do a much better job with the Mexicans already here by simply dropping the victimization game.

    “Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable.”

    When they remain a Gomezian minority. But when they turn into a Fuentesian majority, they get all macho and give middle finger to gringo and imitate Negroes.

    Its like your stomach can digest a taco, or two tacos or even three. But if you shove 50 tacos into your stomach, it’s just gonna explode and turn totally taco.
    Your stomach can digest only so many tacos.
    US can assimilate only so many non-white minorities.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    It seems to me that Mexican is like the Liberal.

    Any opinion or taste is allowable while they are an observable minority. When they have achieved, or at least can claim, majority status, the gloves come off, the bans are announced and the Memory Hole gets warmed up.
  88. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @RadicalCenter
    I'm a white American / European-American and very proud of it. My Asian wife would be surprised to hear that she hates me. Our very American and apolitical Asian friends don't hate me either. The fault line in dire times will be Africans against whites and Asians (and hopefully Mexicans) wherever the latter are threatened or live concentrations of Africans, not white versus Asian for the most part.

    There's anti-white animus among arrogant Asians to some extent in the USA, for sure, but Asians are often "reachable" and amenable to a way of life more like ours. In a situation of prolonged rioting or mob attacks, which will surely be or become racially delineated, Asians even more so will need the remaining whites for either of them to survive, and vice versa.

    “My Asian wife would be surprised to hear that she hates me.”

    Isn’t there no deception in the sushi, kimchi, or dimsum?

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Yet another Asian country, but I like your guesses :)
  89. Rehmat says:
    @Boris

    Why you think Jewish communities were expelled from Christian Europe over 108 times?
     
    Because of antisemitic moron conspiracy theorists like you, obviously.

    Yes, lots of Jews are racist. The argument that racist Jews tricked white American police officers into being racist is one of the dumbest things I've read on Unz. And that is saying something.

    Let us see who is the dumbest person – you who believes that Wailing Wall was part of the destroyed Jewish Temple Mount or I who believe the wall was part of a Roman fortress?

    Well, last month UNESCO agreed with my view and called you a MORON.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/04/18/unesco-the-western-wall-is-not-jewish/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris
    Um...I have never thought about the origins of the wailing wall because I don't care. I'm also not Jewish, which people on this site seem to have a problem comprehending.
  90. KenH says:
    @WorkingClass
    I'm a working class white guy living in a majority black city in the deep south. I know a lot of black people who work for a living and are not criminals. They don't like the gang bangers any more than I do. They are the victims of black on black crime. I live in a mixed neighborhood which is less dangerous than the all black neighborhoods. Still, the swat teams here manage to break into the wrong address and shoot the wrong people. The police are the only thing keeping the gangs of thugs down. But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.

    Black Lives Matter is funded, I am told, by Mr. Soros. What I would tell BLM is they are being used to exacerbate racial strife in America. Keeping black and white at each others throats is public policy. What I would tell comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer, is that police brutality and criminality are real. That the war on drugs with its vast gulag of jails and prisons is real.

    We all have a common enemy. The Police State and the scumbags who own it. We will have neither liberty nor peace and prosperity until we unite against our oppressors. Not BLM. Not Mexicans. Not queers or feminists or cry babies on campus. Not white racists or red necks. But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    If the police or the police state machinery is used against whites blacks don’t care like you care about them. They even cheer and celebrate it. The black sweetie pies you speak of also voted for Hussein Obama at 95%. Don’t ever think you have allies in the black race as most utterly loathe all non-blacks and especially white people.

    Read More
  91. Jefferson says:
    @rod1963
    Hispanics do not like blacks period.

    In Los Angeles, there is a well known phenomena of ethnic cleansing of blacks from Hispanic neighborhoods. They'll have a Mexican gang member kill a few black bucks to send a message to the rest to leave and they do. The LAPD is fully aware of it but can't do or say anything about it.

    “Hispanics do not like blacks period.”

    Hispanics do not like Whites period.

    ” Los Angeles, there is a well known phenomena of ethnic cleansing of blacks from Hispanic neighborhoods”

    In Los Angeles there is a well known phenomenon of racial cleansing of Whites by Hispanics. Los Angeles did not always look like Mexico. At one time Los Angeles was a Whitopia.

    A lot of the the Mexican neighborhoods in Los Angeles today at one time used to have a sea of blondes, but no more.

    Read More
  92. Jefferson says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    I think a lot more Mexicans would assimilate if we would stop mollycoddling them and tell them in no uncertain terms that they will not be allowed to play the victim card.

    My job requires me to visit many different neighborhoods. From the ground level, I get to see everything from the $2 million mansion homes to the places you wouldn't want to get caught in after dark. Many of the older suburban neighborhoods---the places that once nestled young White families 40 years ago---are now overrun by Hispanics, with a few Asians (mostly Hmong or Laotian, I'm guessing, from the names) and the elderly White remnant living among them. It's one of the unmistakable symptoms of a neighborhood in decline.

    But I'm continually impressed by how "normal" the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans---the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar---but the kids are delightful. They all speak English, usually without any trace of a Cholo accent. They may be bilingual, but they seem to have very little interest in speaking Spanish. And they want to wear the same clothes, eat the same foods, play the same video games, and watch the same TV shows as as all the White children of comparable age. A few years later, when they become teenagers, the girls like to flaunt their figures in Lululemon halter tops and listen to club music. Not exactly the wisest choices in and of themselves, but it's the same thing the young White girls are doing, which was my point.

    Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable. The single biggest factor preventing them from doing so is the White liberal culture that wants to "raise Hispanic consciousness" by first deliberately creating an identity ghetto for these people and then by attaching perks for those who maintain such an identity. Absent that, Mexican assimilation would go much quicker and smoother, for they do not seem to possess the inherent incapacity for White society as, for example, the Blacks do.

    By the way, none of this should be taken to mean that I want any more Mexicans in the USA. I am pro-Trump and pro-Wall. But I think we could do a much better job with the Mexicans already here by simply dropping the victimization game.

    “But I’m continually impressed by how “normal” the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans—the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar—but the kids are delightful.”

    The kids are delightful? Even though statistics prove that American born Hispanics commit more crime and are more likely to join street gangs than Fresh Off The Boat Hispanics. Also American born Hispanics on average do not have the same strong work ethic as their immigrant parents. American born Hispanics tend to adopt the lazyness culture of Dindu Nuffins. Haven’t you notice that most Hispanic gangbangers in The U.S are fluent in English and that is because most of them were either born here or came here when they were little. If you see a Hispanic in Boyle Heights Los Angeles for example with tattoos covering his entire neck while driving a 64 lowrider, he most likely knows how to speak English. He has culturally adopted the African American gangsta lifestyle, he is not culturally assimilating into Whiteness.

    It’s similar to Muslims in Western countries. European and American born Muslims are more likely to be religious radicals than their immigrant parents.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Son of Dixie
    Yes, the second generation of Mexicans are an urban underclass rife with drug use, drug selling and violent crimes. They offer nothing to the betterment of the United States and are a burden upon the White American tax payers.

    The first generation of illegal aliens are hard workers for the most part thankful to be in a nation that offers the opportunity to get ahead. Their children are racist parasites. Same as African immigrants.

    All should be deported.
  93. We’re so busy commenting on “No Go” zones in European cities that we don’t seem to see them in the US.

    Read More
  94. Jefferson says:

    Here is a Mexican group called Brownside, who decided they want to culturally assimilate into ghetto African American culture and chose not to culturally assimilate into Whiteness.

    Read More
  95. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Twinkie

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.
     
    That's an utter nonsense. Housing and residential patterns show that Asians integrate far better with whites than blacks do (Hispanics are in-between).

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes.
     
    Hispanics are, yes (except Cubans). Asians vary depending on country of origin and time period. During some elections they vote for Democrats; in others they vote Republican. Koreans and Vietnamese tend to vote Republican while Indians vote heavily for Democrats.

    They are not the new Italians and Irish.
     
    Those groups voted heavily for corrupt machine politics early in their immigrant histories.

    They are not culturally assimilating into White America.
     
    The Manhattan Institute has been studying assimilation of major immigrant groups for a number of years now. Culturally, Filipinos, Vietnamese, Koreans, and Cubans assimilate at high rates. Indians, Chinese, and Mexicans do so at low rates.

    There is something to what Jefferson says.

    You are of an older generation of Asian-Americans and a Christian to boot, so you think differently.

    Yellows are a slavish race and wanna fit into the prevailing narrative.

    Even though US was most instrumental in dividing your nation and giving half to Stalin(it was US idea to have Russians come in) and even though US bombing of the North was near-genocidal—and even though US foreign policy is geared to keep divided Korea forever to use SK as a puppet client–, you dutifully became a Christian and serve the USA.
    Back when you were growing up, US was proudly Christian and still dominated by Anglo-Americans. So, slavish and dog-like Koreans followed that model of Americanism. Koreans, like all yellows, worship authority and power, and US seemed so powerful. So, you became like a wanna-be American in spirituality, politics, and world-view.

    Unlike Korea that modernized without sovereignty–under Japanese and then under American domination–, Japan modernized with sovereignty and thus developed more of an independent mindset. Also, its geographical separation from China also helped it develop more of a unique mindset. (But as Japanese dependency on the US continues long after end of WWII, Japan too is losing its sense of national uniqueness and sovereignty and turning into a material society with no identity, heritage, and meaning. Japanese live on junk food and junk anime culture.)
    In contrast, because Korea as stuck next to China as a kind of vassal state, the Korean cultural mindset is to follow and imitate the Big Power. It used to be China for 2000 yrs. Now, it’s the US, and South Koreans are the biggest dogs in the world. And you are a prime example.

    Of course, a lot of good and even great things were achieved by Koreans under foreign rule. Though Kors bitch about Japan, Japan did much to modernize Korea and bring it into the 20th century. And thanks to US protection and markets, SK was able to economically develop and make considerable progress. But it is nevertheless a whore nation without sovereignty. It is also a coward nation. Little Israel defends itself by itself even though surrounded by hostile nations. But even though SK has a much bigger population and demographic advantage over NK — some say SK economy is 30x that of NK –, SK is still a whore-bitch that begs for US protection from their starving national brethren up north. Also, if SK is really under threat, shouldn’t south koreans stay and protect their own nation? But no, they run from their own nation and come to the US and other nations. Also, SK boys now act like pansy boys. And these girly men ask Americans to defend them. What a nation of pussy cowards. They scream about threat from the starving north, act like girly boys, and hide behind uncle sam for protection.. while so many Kors wanna leave their country and settle elsewhere permanently.

    Of course, US is now a very different nation, and the world is very different. There was a time in the Cold War when it was US vs USSR and Red China. And SK fell into US orbit. As communism sucks, it had no choice but to be US’s bitch. Same with Japan and Taiwan. As China and USSR backed NK, SK had to stick with US.

    But Cold War is long gone. China wants good relations with both NK and SK, and indeed is now closer to SK. Russia is no longer an enemy and wants good relations with both NK and SK. Cold War is so over. And SK is happy to deal with China and Russia.
    So, what it the problem? It is NK and US. NK is ruled by a shitter, but US also deserves much blame. Surely, US knows the Cold War is over. Surely, US knows NK poses no threat to any nation despite its bad boy antics. NK poses a threat to whom? China, Japan, Russia, the US? It may pose some threat to SK, but even norks know they cannot conquer SK. Also, if NK attacked first, NO NATION, not even China, would come to its side. They would all condemn NK and side with SK. US could end all sanctions and tensions with NK if it wanted to. If US did with NK what it is now doing with Cuba, then NK will likely gradually come to the table.

    So, why does US still act like NK poses some kind of grave threat?
    Two reasons.

    1. Jews. Jews don’t give a shit about NK. The ONLY reason NK became an issue was because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. That’s it. Jews don’t give a shit about human rights. They had no problem dealing with Saudis. They don’t care about Palestinians who live like Kors under Japper rule. NK became a pariah nation ONLY because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. (Never mind Israel was the closest ally of Apartheid South Africa during the Cold War.)

    2. China. US now sees China as the main rival in the Pacific, and it wants to use SK as its puppet indefinitely. If tensions were to fade between north and south and if two koreas were to slowly unite, US military will have to move out of SK. Also, as there will be so much work to be done in reunification, Kors will become more nationalist in their mindset. In order to fuse south and north, they would need to emphasize what they have in common: race, history, culture, language. Thus, Korea would become less global and more nationalist. And without US military presence, it will grow closer to China, thus reverting to its traditional role in Asia.
    This is what US doesn’t want. So, it keeps ramping up tensions. Even though NK is nutty, its nuclear ambitions are purely defensive, esp in light of US criminal acts in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. What happened to Gaddafi for his goodwill gesture? He got bombed and tortured to death, and Hillary laughed about it. Neocons of GOP and Lib Zionists of Democratic Party are all warmongering sickos.

    So, in order to keep the two koreas separate forever, US keeps stirring up tensions. It ignores all its violation of international agreements and just blames NK. Now, if we see NK actions without context, they do seem nutty. But when we see them in context of American international behavior in Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine, then north korea is acting rationally. At least as much as Israel that has 300 nukes for defensive purposes. Even an evil regime can have rational reasons. NK regime is evil, but it is acting rationally since US foreign policy is evil(though most Americans are not).
    US also tries to keep the two koreas separate by making South Korea fundamentally different from the north culturally, ideologically, and even demographically. NK and SK, due to long separation, are different in many ways. But they have one thing in common: race, ancestry, traditional history, language. So, despite differences in politics and economics, both side still core commonalities that may allow reunification. But now SK is into multiculturalism. In a nation where women don’t want to have kids and where so many people want to leave forever, SK is now welcoming the world to invade like Europe is doing. As SK academics, elites, and media people are all brainwashed by US globalism, they think they must follow and join the US-dominated order. Now, Kerry says the world should be without borders.

    So, with more Koreans leaving Korea and with more non-Koreans becoming ‘new Koreans’ and more Koreans becoming racially mixed, in time SK will become so different from NK not only in economics and politics but in race and identity and demographics. Instead of NK and SK being one race/people divided only by politics and economics, they will really become two different peoples. While NK will maintain its racial integrity, SK will become like Latin America with massive immigration and race-mixing. And these ‘new koreans’ will not see NK as the same race and people. (Indeed, even white wanna-be South Koreans who get plastic surgery or dream of marrying non-koreans feel ashamed of being Korean and want fuse with the West than with their racial brethren up north.)

    And then, SK will never reunite with NK, and America’s great crime of having divided an innocent nation will be permanent and SK will be US’s bitch-whore forever. (In contrast, Vietnam is united forever.) What the US and USSR did to Korea was not much different from what Germany and USSR did to Poland in 39. The great powers divided an innocent nation, and both sides decapitated the elites.
    In NK, the USSR wiped out the native leftists and installed puppet Kim Il Sung.
    In the SK, US backed Rhee and favored collaborators under the Japanese. And US allowed the Rhee regime to exterminate 300,000 people in a massive bloodbath that went far beyond Katyn. SK elites became so slavish to the US because without US support, they would have been removed from power for having collaborated with the Japanese. And this slavish mentality lives on to this day.

    SK now gets a black African to run for it in the olympics. SK girls get plastic surgery and dye their hair blonde to look white. SK boys put on girly makeup and try to look like white girls too. SK pop culture is worship of black thug culture. K-pop that is the main culture of SK is just a korean fantasy of Koreans being white or black. It doesn’t promote and sell koreans as koreans but koreans as white/black wanna-be’s.

    And with 1 million Koreans in the US, Korean-American way now is the template for SK itself. SK looks to Korean-America as model. So, what is the Korean-American Way all about? It’s about race-mixing galore and loss of identity and worship of black culture and homo culture and celebrity garbage. As SK follows this Korean-American model, it will become just a imitation of California. And it will become so different from the North in culture and race that it will never unite with the North. SK will just become like a commonwealth like Puerto Rico. Or just a defacto state of US like Hawaii.

    When US was mostly white, Christian, and patriotic, many SK’s looked to those modes as the model for Korea. But as US is now ruled by Jews, homos, open borders globalists, and promotes interracialism, those themes are the main template for SK.
    Like I said, yellows love to imitate and follow since they lack originality, individuality, and sense of sovereignty. This slavishness is esp big among Koreans since Korea has a long history of sucking up to big china. Now, it sucks up to Big US that is a totally degenerate nation.

    While older Korean-Americans may have voted Republican and been ‘conservative’, things are totally different for younger generation of Kor-Americans and Asian-Americans in general. Since all the rich cities, top colleges, pop culture, and media are so Liberal and ‘leftist’, most young Asian-Americans go that way because they worship power, privilege, wealth, and ‘coolness’. This is even truer among Korean-Americans since they tend to be impulsive, imitative, childish, and earnest in their sucking up to whatever is ‘cool’ and ‘hip’ and ‘powerful’. Since US worships Jews, homos, and blacks, younger generation of Kor-Americans are into worship of that stuff.

    Even though younger Korean-Americans disagree with you on lots of issues, you and they have one thing in common. Both you and they arrived at values and attitudes due to slavishness to the great power. When you were young, US was still about white power, Christianity, majority power, and etc. So, you came to respect and admire those things about America.

    Today, US is all about minority privilege, homo worship, Jewish supremacy, black cool. So, today’s young Korean-Americans imitate and follow those themes and narratives.

    If you want a taste of what most young Korean-Americans are into, go to twitter and check out Jay Caspian Kang(journalist) and look at his tweets and those of his friends. They just suck up to what is the new prevailing Americanism… just like older generation of Koreans were into the prevailing Americanism when they were young(when Christianity was big in America). They are all about BLM. It doesn’t matter that blacks may be committing violence against Asians. Slavish Korean-Americans feel the ‘cool deficit’ and wanna be cool by being pro-black, thus having ‘black cool’ rubbed off on them.

    The nature of Korean-America is easy to understand. It is whatever happens to be prevail in American culture. Koreans lack agency and just imitate the Big Power.
    So, Korean Right is all about waving the American Flag and Uncle Sam. and Korean Left is all about imitating BLM and waving the homo flag.
    Asian news says that 80% of SK millennials are ‘progressive’, only 19% is conservative. Addicted to pop culture, homo propaganda emanating from the US, and American PC that Korean academics pick up and imitate, the future of SK is a mere doglike servility and imitation of whatever happens in America.

    So, Jefferson isn’t entirely wrong. Look at the younger generation of Korean-Americans, and they do ‘hate’ white people. Not because they had bad experiences with whites but because they are slavish imitators. Since US academia and media(that are controlled by Jews) spread anti-white propaganda and agenda all over, it’s only natural that Korean-Americans would jump on the bandwagon of anti-white PC. So, even as they prefer to live in white communities and send their kids to white schools, they grow up with PC, MLK worship, rap music, and anti-white cult as their main worldview. Since Koreans don’t know how to think for themselves, they just follow the cultural zeitgeist.
    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity. It’s because you too are dog-like follower.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jefferson
    At least Koreans are not protesting Donald Trump on the streets by waving Korean flags. The Mexicans in The U.S who wave Mexican flags to protest Donald Trump and his patriotic White American supporters, those Mexicans make sick.
    , @Jim Christian
    Harsh truths. But still the truth.
    , @Twinkie

    Yellows are a slavish race
     
    You could have saved yourself a lot of keystrokes and left it at that. The rest of your long, incoherent, and rambling ranting adds nothing further to that statement.

    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity.
     
    1. I never said I was Korean.

    2. I was brought to the U.S. by my parents, and grew up here partly. Being an American is an organic part of my identity, as I grew up eating PB&J, watching "Family Ties," and pledging allegiance to the flag every morning in class, and going to Sunday school and church.

    3. You should make up your mind on whether conforming to American social norms is being "slavish" or assimilation. The problem with people like you is that you play "heads I win, tails you lose."

    It’s because you too are dog-like follower.
     
    "Dog-like" is a compliment, thanks. I keep a large pack of dogs. Dogs are loyal, dependable, courageous, and hardy. They ask for very little and in turn give a lot more. If more people were like dogs, it would be a better world. I've found dogs to be more trustworthy than most people.

    In this world, there are sheep, there are wolves, and there are (sheep) dogs. I chose to be a dog.

    As for being a follower, perhaps you didn't learn what I learned while carrying arms for my adapted country: "To be a leader, first learn to follow."
  96. @Technomad
    I keep hearing and hearing and hearing about blacks that aren't criminals and don't support crime. But where the hell are they when black "spokesmen" are howling about some dindu getting a bullet for his monkeyshines? The "law-abiding" blacks can either turn on their criminal kin, or can suffer along with them. I'm sick of them.

    Guilt by association. Just like what’s happening with the muslims.

    Read More
  97. Boris says:
    @Rehmat
    Let us see who is the dumbest person - you who believes that Wailing Wall was part of the destroyed Jewish Temple Mount or I who believe the wall was part of a Roman fortress?

    Well, last month UNESCO agreed with my view and called you a MORON.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/04/18/unesco-the-western-wall-is-not-jewish/

    Um…I have never thought about the origins of the wailing wall because I don’t care. I’m also not Jewish, which people on this site seem to have a problem comprehending.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    "I’m also not Jewish." So since you have dropped your filthy Zionist pants - tell what you really are? Caitlyn Jenner, I suppose!

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/05/05/caitlyn-jenner-thats-how-i-celebrate-my-gold-medal/
  98. What is the rationale of this topic and some of these comments? Do you really think that there is going to be some sort of MASS uprising by blacks or whites, that neighborhoods will become segregated by law, or police officers policing by segregation…or somehow the Jews are going to be expelled en masse for the 110th time? Dream on.

    Oh, l get it, it’s just the 101st Keyboard Brigade blowing off steam again….

    Read More
  99. dcite says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Oh, and a tough one: fire the racist morons. They are terrible cops.
     
    Good grief. The "racist cop" trope? Has there ever been a more self-evident fallacy? The number of actual racist cops must be pretty close to zero. What racist would take a job where he had to have close daily contact with negroes? Where he could at any moment have to administer CPR to a negro? Where he is required to risk his own life to help negroes? For a real racist, law enforcement has to be just about the worst possible career choice.

    What cops are, almost universally, is "race realist." This too is self-evident. A cop, whether white, negro, Asian, or Latino, lives in a world where those crime statistics are very much up close and personal. If he is unable to determine relative risk between a group of white kids standing on a corner with skateboards and a group of negro kids with pants sagging halfway to their knees, his chances of getting home to see his wife that night are significantly lower. Cops know very well the negro propensity for crime generally and violent crime in particular. That they knowingly spend their days combating negro criminals in negro neighborhoods to protect mostly negro citizens (many of which are overtly hostile to the cops), makes it pretty darn obvious that most cops are almost fanatic negro-lovers willing to risk their own lives and endure mob hostility just to help those few negro civilians who live in those concrete jungles.

    Boris seems to be a bubble boy with a BLM badge. Drop him off in the middle of black Baltimore hood and let him report back.
    btw, the policeman most “guilty” in the Freddi Gray incident was black.

    It’s a contrived narrative. Interracial crime is overwhelmingly black on white. Boris really needs to address that racism before he has any credibility. The occasional epithet a white cop may utter is nothing compared to what they face. Blacks utter quite a few epithets of their own.

    That some SJW can base his argument on the possible uttering of a word, rather than on the rivers of blood and destroyed metropolises, is … interesting. Shows their desperation to keep the game going.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris

    Interracial crime is overwhelmingly black on white. Boris really needs to address that racism before he has any credibility.
     
    To race-obsessed rightists pining for the days of Jim Crow, interracial crime MUST be a result of racism. It rarely is.


    The occasional epithet a white cop may utter is nothing compared to what they face. Blacks utter quite a few epithets of their own.
     
    Are you saying that racists don't deserve equal treatment under the law? You may want to rethink this based only on your own rational self-interest.

    That some SJW can base his argument on the possible uttering of a word
     
    The uttering of the word is pretty revealing. You seem to forget that you racists are absolutely petrified of sharing your real views.
  100. Rehmat says:
    @Boris
    Um...I have never thought about the origins of the wailing wall because I don't care. I'm also not Jewish, which people on this site seem to have a problem comprehending.

    “I’m also not Jewish.” So since you have dropped your filthy Zionist pants – tell what you really are? Caitlyn Jenner, I suppose!

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/05/05/caitlyn-jenner-thats-how-i-celebrate-my-gold-medal/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris

    tell what you really are?
     
    I'm your intellectual superior. But then, that's most people.
  101. @Jefferson
    "But I’m continually impressed by how “normal” the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans—the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar—but the kids are delightful."

    The kids are delightful? Even though statistics prove that American born Hispanics commit more crime and are more likely to join street gangs than Fresh Off The Boat Hispanics. Also American born Hispanics on average do not have the same strong work ethic as their immigrant parents. American born Hispanics tend to adopt the lazyness culture of Dindu Nuffins. Haven't you notice that most Hispanic gangbangers in The U.S are fluent in English and that is because most of them were either born here or came here when they were little. If you see a Hispanic in Boyle Heights Los Angeles for example with tattoos covering his entire neck while driving a 64 lowrider, he most likely knows how to speak English. He has culturally adopted the African American gangsta lifestyle, he is not culturally assimilating into Whiteness.

    It's similar to Muslims in Western countries. European and American born Muslims are more likely to be religious radicals than their immigrant parents.

    Yes, the second generation of Mexicans are an urban underclass rife with drug use, drug selling and violent crimes. They offer nothing to the betterment of the United States and are a burden upon the White American tax payers.

    The first generation of illegal aliens are hard workers for the most part thankful to be in a nation that offers the opportunity to get ahead. Their children are racist parasites. Same as African immigrants.

    All should be deported.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    yeah hey Fred on Everything but the beaners,

    I will join you on separation from darkies if you will join me on separation from brownies, who are doing more and more crime where I live in Bay Area California.

    Maybe you can form a welcoming committee and Liberate! them from the Yanqui! Yanqui no!, Methico Si! Move them into your neighborhood.....aaaasiiii Cisco....aaasiii Pancho....aaaii Frediiii, Amigo pora banditos. Be a hero! AS it stands you are a white race traitor, might as well be a hero to somebody.


    Joe Webb
  102. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website

    Even a Negro thinks SJW have gone too far.

    Read More
  103. Boris says:
    @Rehmat
    "I’m also not Jewish." So since you have dropped your filthy Zionist pants - tell what you really are? Caitlyn Jenner, I suppose!

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/05/05/caitlyn-jenner-thats-how-i-celebrate-my-gold-medal/

    tell what you really are?

    I’m your intellectual superior. But then, that’s most people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    How could you be superior to anyone while you proved beyond any doubt that your brain is hanging between your legs.

    Shalom and keep patting your Zionist butts.
  104. Boris says:
    @dcite
    Boris seems to be a bubble boy with a BLM badge. Drop him off in the middle of black Baltimore hood and let him report back.
    btw, the policeman most "guilty" in the Freddi Gray incident was black.

    It's a contrived narrative. Interracial crime is overwhelmingly black on white. Boris really needs to address that racism before he has any credibility. The occasional epithet a white cop may utter is nothing compared to what they face. Blacks utter quite a few epithets of their own.

    That some SJW can base his argument on the possible uttering of a word, rather than on the rivers of blood and destroyed metropolises, is ... interesting. Shows their desperation to keep the game going.

    Interracial crime is overwhelmingly black on white. Boris really needs to address that racism before he has any credibility.

    To race-obsessed rightists pining for the days of Jim Crow, interracial crime MUST be a result of racism. It rarely is.

    The occasional epithet a white cop may utter is nothing compared to what they face. Blacks utter quite a few epithets of their own.

    Are you saying that racists don’t deserve equal treatment under the law? You may want to rethink this based only on your own rational self-interest.

    That some SJW can base his argument on the possible uttering of a word

    The uttering of the word is pretty revealing. You seem to forget that you racists are absolutely petrified of sharing your real views.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Khan Bodin
    Liberal, atheistical, secular "Jew." You are a Jew by origins. I can tell. I can smell it on you like musk! You and your liberal Jewish ilk are the reason why Jews as the people are so hated. Everywhere you come, the hate of your kind comes with as well. Must be something in the air, or it is perhaps your behavior which is responsible for it. But don't question your behavior, liberal Jew. Wait until someone else does it for you.

    And you are an imbecilic, very stupid creature, secular Jew. You cannot intellectually best even the squirrel, you imbecile. People are laughing at you and your moronic intellect, Jew. You are a mong, not even an intellectual dwarf.

    Mong:
    Adj.
    i) lacking in cerebral ability: general retardation
    ii) slang for spastic, but used against a person who says or does something completely idiotic by accident or without realization. This makes every witness simultaneously raise their hands to their shoulders and shake 'em while sticking their tongue in their lower lip and making 'urrgh' noises
    iii) a derogatory verb commonly used to describe the state of one's lack of common sense
    iv) an abbreviation for "mentally wrong"
    v) someone that is not right in the head, very dopey or even someone that has been on drugs
  105. @Intelligent Dasein
    I think a lot more Mexicans would assimilate if we would stop mollycoddling them and tell them in no uncertain terms that they will not be allowed to play the victim card.

    My job requires me to visit many different neighborhoods. From the ground level, I get to see everything from the $2 million mansion homes to the places you wouldn't want to get caught in after dark. Many of the older suburban neighborhoods---the places that once nestled young White families 40 years ago---are now overrun by Hispanics, with a few Asians (mostly Hmong or Laotian, I'm guessing, from the names) and the elderly White remnant living among them. It's one of the unmistakable symptoms of a neighborhood in decline.

    But I'm continually impressed by how "normal" the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans---the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar---but the kids are delightful. They all speak English, usually without any trace of a Cholo accent. They may be bilingual, but they seem to have very little interest in speaking Spanish. And they want to wear the same clothes, eat the same foods, play the same video games, and watch the same TV shows as as all the White children of comparable age. A few years later, when they become teenagers, the girls like to flaunt their figures in Lululemon halter tops and listen to club music. Not exactly the wisest choices in and of themselves, but it's the same thing the young White girls are doing, which was my point.

    Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable. The single biggest factor preventing them from doing so is the White liberal culture that wants to "raise Hispanic consciousness" by first deliberately creating an identity ghetto for these people and then by attaching perks for those who maintain such an identity. Absent that, Mexican assimilation would go much quicker and smoother, for they do not seem to possess the inherent incapacity for White society as, for example, the Blacks do.

    By the way, none of this should be taken to mean that I want any more Mexicans in the USA. I am pro-Trump and pro-Wall. But I think we could do a much better job with the Mexicans already here by simply dropping the victimization game.

    Sounds like you live in SoCal? We live right in Los Angeles and have a somewhat more negative impression of those supposedly charming Mexican kids. They very often are speaking Spanish — can’t and don’t read all that much in English — and are a bunch of rude, rough little grunts on the playgrounds with our kids. They also act and dress wigger, whatever the mex equivalent is, by the time they reach pre-teen years.

    Read More
  106. @Priss Factor
    "My Asian wife would be surprised to hear that she hates me."

    Isn't there no deception in the sushi, kimchi, or dimsum?

    Yet another Asian country, but I like your guesses :)

    Read More
  107. joe webb says:
    @Son of Dixie
    Yes, the second generation of Mexicans are an urban underclass rife with drug use, drug selling and violent crimes. They offer nothing to the betterment of the United States and are a burden upon the White American tax payers.

    The first generation of illegal aliens are hard workers for the most part thankful to be in a nation that offers the opportunity to get ahead. Their children are racist parasites. Same as African immigrants.

    All should be deported.

    yeah hey Fred on Everything but the beaners,

    I will join you on separation from darkies if you will join me on separation from brownies, who are doing more and more crime where I live in Bay Area California.

    Maybe you can form a welcoming committee and Liberate! them from the Yanqui! Yanqui no!, Methico Si! Move them into your neighborhood…..aaaasiiii Cisco….aaasiii Pancho….aaaii Frediiii, Amigo pora banditos. Be a hero! AS it stands you are a white race traitor, might as well be a hero to somebody.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  108. @Jefferson
    "Black lives don’t matter to other blacks….they slaughter each other relentlessly."

    Black lives only matter to Blacks when racial outsiders like Whites kill one of their tribesmen.

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.

    That seems true. In like manner, they call each other nigger, yet will not allow a white person to even use the word in a sentence. Weird shit.

    Read More
  109. asshat says:
    @Rehmat
    Fred reed, may I suggest you listen to Max Blumenthal why the American White policemen kill Blacks indiscriminately? Blumenthal claims because these killers of non-White minorities were trained by Israeli forces who happened to hate non-White Israelis - Jews or non-Jews.

    “I was most surprised at the banality of the racism and violence that I witnessed and how it’s so widely tolerated because it’s so common. And I’m most surprised that it hasn’t made its way to the American public,” says Blumenthal.

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/10/14/max-blumenthal-on-racism-and-violence-in-israel/

    This is a moronic comment even by your standards.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    I never claimed to talk sense out of the 9ft thick Wailing Wall.

    https://rehmat1.com/2011/08/12/the-%E2%80%98wailing-wall%E2%80%99-is-not-jewish/
  110. asshat says:
    @RaceRealist88

    I mean, you could never be responsible for your own miserable life. Your failure must be because some Jews got together in black robes and drank gentile blood. Or something. I can’t be expected to keep up with the stupid things you believe.
     
    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others "because I'm a failure"? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am.

    It's stupid noticing who has the most power in the US media? Or how about the certain ethnic group you're not allowed to speak about or you're planning anuda shoah?

    Fact of the matter is this. The Jews have put a strangle hold on discourse, to keep the goyim blind. If you want to laugh and make jokes about it, good on you. Just know that the goyim DO know and one day we will kick the Jews out for the 110th time.

    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others “because I’m a failure”? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am

    the 88 in your name is an almost sure sign that you’re an idiot.
    Now I know I’m generalizing, but the two are pretty correlated.
    You’d know all about that since youre a race realist not a white dindu complaining as usual, right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88
    It's my birth year, genius. But you can assume all you want. Hey, is your hat an ass or is your ass a hat? Same shit.

    My comments, nor my username on Unz review is not a measure of my success, genius.

  111. Jefferson says:
    @Anon
    There is something to what Jefferson says.

    You are of an older generation of Asian-Americans and a Christian to boot, so you think differently.

    Yellows are a slavish race and wanna fit into the prevailing narrative.

    Even though US was most instrumental in dividing your nation and giving half to Stalin(it was US idea to have Russians come in) and even though US bombing of the North was near-genocidal---and even though US foreign policy is geared to keep divided Korea forever to use SK as a puppet client--, you dutifully became a Christian and serve the USA.
    Back when you were growing up, US was proudly Christian and still dominated by Anglo-Americans. So, slavish and dog-like Koreans followed that model of Americanism. Koreans, like all yellows, worship authority and power, and US seemed so powerful. So, you became like a wanna-be American in spirituality, politics, and world-view.

    Unlike Korea that modernized without sovereignty--under Japanese and then under American domination--, Japan modernized with sovereignty and thus developed more of an independent mindset. Also, its geographical separation from China also helped it develop more of a unique mindset. (But as Japanese dependency on the US continues long after end of WWII, Japan too is losing its sense of national uniqueness and sovereignty and turning into a material society with no identity, heritage, and meaning. Japanese live on junk food and junk anime culture.)
    In contrast, because Korea as stuck next to China as a kind of vassal state, the Korean cultural mindset is to follow and imitate the Big Power. It used to be China for 2000 yrs. Now, it's the US, and South Koreans are the biggest dogs in the world. And you are a prime example.

    Of course, a lot of good and even great things were achieved by Koreans under foreign rule. Though Kors bitch about Japan, Japan did much to modernize Korea and bring it into the 20th century. And thanks to US protection and markets, SK was able to economically develop and make considerable progress. But it is nevertheless a whore nation without sovereignty. It is also a coward nation. Little Israel defends itself by itself even though surrounded by hostile nations. But even though SK has a much bigger population and demographic advantage over NK -- some say SK economy is 30x that of NK --, SK is still a whore-bitch that begs for US protection from their starving national brethren up north. Also, if SK is really under threat, shouldn't south koreans stay and protect their own nation? But no, they run from their own nation and come to the US and other nations. Also, SK boys now act like pansy boys. And these girly men ask Americans to defend them. What a nation of pussy cowards. They scream about threat from the starving north, act like girly boys, and hide behind uncle sam for protection.. while so many Kors wanna leave their country and settle elsewhere permanently.

    Of course, US is now a very different nation, and the world is very different. There was a time in the Cold War when it was US vs USSR and Red China. And SK fell into US orbit. As communism sucks, it had no choice but to be US's bitch. Same with Japan and Taiwan. As China and USSR backed NK, SK had to stick with US.

    But Cold War is long gone. China wants good relations with both NK and SK, and indeed is now closer to SK. Russia is no longer an enemy and wants good relations with both NK and SK. Cold War is so over. And SK is happy to deal with China and Russia.
    So, what it the problem? It is NK and US. NK is ruled by a shitter, but US also deserves much blame. Surely, US knows the Cold War is over. Surely, US knows NK poses no threat to any nation despite its bad boy antics. NK poses a threat to whom? China, Japan, Russia, the US? It may pose some threat to SK, but even norks know they cannot conquer SK. Also, if NK attacked first, NO NATION, not even China, would come to its side. They would all condemn NK and side with SK. US could end all sanctions and tensions with NK if it wanted to. If US did with NK what it is now doing with Cuba, then NK will likely gradually come to the table.

    So, why does US still act like NK poses some kind of grave threat?
    Two reasons.

    1. Jews. Jews don't give a shit about NK. The ONLY reason NK became an issue was because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. That's it. Jews don't give a shit about human rights. They had no problem dealing with Saudis. They don't care about Palestinians who live like Kors under Japper rule. NK became a pariah nation ONLY because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. (Never mind Israel was the closest ally of Apartheid South Africa during the Cold War.)

    2. China. US now sees China as the main rival in the Pacific, and it wants to use SK as its puppet indefinitely. If tensions were to fade between north and south and if two koreas were to slowly unite, US military will have to move out of SK. Also, as there will be so much work to be done in reunification, Kors will become more nationalist in their mindset. In order to fuse south and north, they would need to emphasize what they have in common: race, history, culture, language. Thus, Korea would become less global and more nationalist. And without US military presence, it will grow closer to China, thus reverting to its traditional role in Asia.
    This is what US doesn't want. So, it keeps ramping up tensions. Even though NK is nutty, its nuclear ambitions are purely defensive, esp in light of US criminal acts in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. What happened to Gaddafi for his goodwill gesture? He got bombed and tortured to death, and Hillary laughed about it. Neocons of GOP and Lib Zionists of Democratic Party are all warmongering sickos.

    So, in order to keep the two koreas separate forever, US keeps stirring up tensions. It ignores all its violation of international agreements and just blames NK. Now, if we see NK actions without context, they do seem nutty. But when we see them in context of American international behavior in Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine, then north korea is acting rationally. At least as much as Israel that has 300 nukes for defensive purposes. Even an evil regime can have rational reasons. NK regime is evil, but it is acting rationally since US foreign policy is evil(though most Americans are not).
    US also tries to keep the two koreas separate by making South Korea fundamentally different from the north culturally, ideologically, and even demographically. NK and SK, due to long separation, are different in many ways. But they have one thing in common: race, ancestry, traditional history, language. So, despite differences in politics and economics, both side still core commonalities that may allow reunification. But now SK is into multiculturalism. In a nation where women don't want to have kids and where so many people want to leave forever, SK is now welcoming the world to invade like Europe is doing. As SK academics, elites, and media people are all brainwashed by US globalism, they think they must follow and join the US-dominated order. Now, Kerry says the world should be without borders.

    So, with more Koreans leaving Korea and with more non-Koreans becoming 'new Koreans' and more Koreans becoming racially mixed, in time SK will become so different from NK not only in economics and politics but in race and identity and demographics. Instead of NK and SK being one race/people divided only by politics and economics, they will really become two different peoples. While NK will maintain its racial integrity, SK will become like Latin America with massive immigration and race-mixing. And these 'new koreans' will not see NK as the same race and people. (Indeed, even white wanna-be South Koreans who get plastic surgery or dream of marrying non-koreans feel ashamed of being Korean and want fuse with the West than with their racial brethren up north.)

    And then, SK will never reunite with NK, and America's great crime of having divided an innocent nation will be permanent and SK will be US's bitch-whore forever. (In contrast, Vietnam is united forever.) What the US and USSR did to Korea was not much different from what Germany and USSR did to Poland in 39. The great powers divided an innocent nation, and both sides decapitated the elites.
    In NK, the USSR wiped out the native leftists and installed puppet Kim Il Sung.
    In the SK, US backed Rhee and favored collaborators under the Japanese. And US allowed the Rhee regime to exterminate 300,000 people in a massive bloodbath that went far beyond Katyn. SK elites became so slavish to the US because without US support, they would have been removed from power for having collaborated with the Japanese. And this slavish mentality lives on to this day.

    SK now gets a black African to run for it in the olympics. SK girls get plastic surgery and dye their hair blonde to look white. SK boys put on girly makeup and try to look like white girls too. SK pop culture is worship of black thug culture. K-pop that is the main culture of SK is just a korean fantasy of Koreans being white or black. It doesn't promote and sell koreans as koreans but koreans as white/black wanna-be's.

    And with 1 million Koreans in the US, Korean-American way now is the template for SK itself. SK looks to Korean-America as model. So, what is the Korean-American Way all about? It's about race-mixing galore and loss of identity and worship of black culture and homo culture and celebrity garbage. As SK follows this Korean-American model, it will become just a imitation of California. And it will become so different from the North in culture and race that it will never unite with the North. SK will just become like a commonwealth like Puerto Rico. Or just a defacto state of US like Hawaii.

    When US was mostly white, Christian, and patriotic, many SK's looked to those modes as the model for Korea. But as US is now ruled by Jews, homos, open borders globalists, and promotes interracialism, those themes are the main template for SK.
    Like I said, yellows love to imitate and follow since they lack originality, individuality, and sense of sovereignty. This slavishness is esp big among Koreans since Korea has a long history of sucking up to big china. Now, it sucks up to Big US that is a totally degenerate nation.

    While older Korean-Americans may have voted Republican and been 'conservative', things are totally different for younger generation of Kor-Americans and Asian-Americans in general. Since all the rich cities, top colleges, pop culture, and media are so Liberal and 'leftist', most young Asian-Americans go that way because they worship power, privilege, wealth, and 'coolness'. This is even truer among Korean-Americans since they tend to be impulsive, imitative, childish, and earnest in their sucking up to whatever is 'cool' and 'hip' and 'powerful'. Since US worships Jews, homos, and blacks, younger generation of Kor-Americans are into worship of that stuff.

    Even though younger Korean-Americans disagree with you on lots of issues, you and they have one thing in common. Both you and they arrived at values and attitudes due to slavishness to the great power. When you were young, US was still about white power, Christianity, majority power, and etc. So, you came to respect and admire those things about America.

    Today, US is all about minority privilege, homo worship, Jewish supremacy, black cool. So, today's young Korean-Americans imitate and follow those themes and narratives.

    If you want a taste of what most young Korean-Americans are into, go to twitter and check out Jay Caspian Kang(journalist) and look at his tweets and those of his friends. They just suck up to what is the new prevailing Americanism... just like older generation of Koreans were into the prevailing Americanism when they were young(when Christianity was big in America). They are all about BLM. It doesn't matter that blacks may be committing violence against Asians. Slavish Korean-Americans feel the 'cool deficit' and wanna be cool by being pro-black, thus having 'black cool' rubbed off on them.

    The nature of Korean-America is easy to understand. It is whatever happens to be prevail in American culture. Koreans lack agency and just imitate the Big Power.
    So, Korean Right is all about waving the American Flag and Uncle Sam. and Korean Left is all about imitating BLM and waving the homo flag.
    Asian news says that 80% of SK millennials are 'progressive', only 19% is conservative. Addicted to pop culture, homo propaganda emanating from the US, and American PC that Korean academics pick up and imitate, the future of SK is a mere doglike servility and imitation of whatever happens in America.

    So, Jefferson isn't entirely wrong. Look at the younger generation of Korean-Americans, and they do 'hate' white people. Not because they had bad experiences with whites but because they are slavish imitators. Since US academia and media(that are controlled by Jews) spread anti-white propaganda and agenda all over, it's only natural that Korean-Americans would jump on the bandwagon of anti-white PC. So, even as they prefer to live in white communities and send their kids to white schools, they grow up with PC, MLK worship, rap music, and anti-white cult as their main worldview. Since Koreans don't know how to think for themselves, they just follow the cultural zeitgeist.
    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity. It's because you too are dog-like follower.

    At least Koreans are not protesting Donald Trump on the streets by waving Korean flags. The Mexicans in The U.S who wave Mexican flags to protest Donald Trump and his patriotic White American supporters, those Mexicans make sick.

    Read More
  112. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Interesting article, I have often wondered what the BLM movement is trying to achieve.
    Seems like BLM has fired up the black community every time a criminal is shoot by the police. I ask why? Why don’t they get upset at the local drug dealer who not only poisons his own race, but kills to “protect” his turf? No white man is forcing them to sell drugs or prostitute themselves.
    Whats the point of ripping up your own neighborhood because your pissed off. Looting from black owned business, what white man is telling them to destroy a business that not only supports his family but is a asset to the local economy. I guess those lives don’t matter, but some lowlife who tries to grab a cops gun because he just committed a crime does?

    I can say that I don’t hate or judge anyone by color, only their actions. If the group who thinks that only black live matter have a emergency and needs law enforcement to respond. Try calling your local drug dealer or thug, then you will discover how much your life matters.

    Read More
  113. @Boris

    Interracial crime is overwhelmingly black on white. Boris really needs to address that racism before he has any credibility.
     
    To race-obsessed rightists pining for the days of Jim Crow, interracial crime MUST be a result of racism. It rarely is.


    The occasional epithet a white cop may utter is nothing compared to what they face. Blacks utter quite a few epithets of their own.
     
    Are you saying that racists don't deserve equal treatment under the law? You may want to rethink this based only on your own rational self-interest.

    That some SJW can base his argument on the possible uttering of a word
     
    The uttering of the word is pretty revealing. You seem to forget that you racists are absolutely petrified of sharing your real views.

    Liberal, atheistical, secular “Jew.” You are a Jew by origins. I can tell. I can smell it on you like musk! You and your liberal Jewish ilk are the reason why Jews as the people are so hated. Everywhere you come, the hate of your kind comes with as well. Must be something in the air, or it is perhaps your behavior which is responsible for it. But don’t question your behavior, liberal Jew. Wait until someone else does it for you.

    And you are an imbecilic, very stupid creature, secular Jew. You cannot intellectually best even the squirrel, you imbecile. People are laughing at you and your moronic intellect, Jew. You are a mong, not even an intellectual dwarf.

    Mong:
    Adj.
    i) lacking in cerebral ability: general retardation
    ii) slang for spastic, but used against a person who says or does something completely idiotic by accident or without realization. This makes every witness simultaneously raise their hands to their shoulders and shake ‘em while sticking their tongue in their lower lip and making ‘urrgh’ noises
    iii) a derogatory verb commonly used to describe the state of one’s lack of common sense
    iv) an abbreviation for “mentally wrong”
    v) someone that is not right in the head, very dopey or even someone that has been on drugs

    Read More
    • Replies: @Boris

    Liberal, atheistical, secular “Jew.” You are a Jew by origins. I can tell. I can smell it on you like musk!
     
    Is that a new Firefoz plugin?

    You and your liberal Jewish ilk are the reason why Jews as the people are so hated.
     
    Jews were hated way before I came along.

    But don’t question your behavior, liberal Jew. Wait until someone else does it for you.
     
    Okay.


    And you are an imbecilic, very stupid creature, secular Jew.
     
    You sound angry. And impotent.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBM9-SNKz6A
  114. Ahh, it’s good to see that you are beginning to learn. You know the fact that Jews have been expelled from 109 countries since 250 AD. Good.

    Their fellow Semites, Phoenician Carthaginians were the ones to first expelled them in the mentioned year.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    Jews were expelled by European Christians 108 times - the longest period of time from England, 350 years. The European Christians are as much Semite as Pope is Ayatullah.

    The so-called "109th" - from Iraq is as much lie as the "Holy Land promised to Jews by the G-d of Scofield Bible".

    http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/ref-giladi.html
  115. Jews simply don’t respect homes of other people they come as guests. Gratefulness is just not a virtue of the Semitic tribe known as Habiru (or Hebrew in the modern language). Wherever they settle they set up a “culture” of nihilism, lies, deceits and sexual perversions. They never show respect for the people, their gods and their culture they settle along. But they do seek respect from others. Someone would call it strange, but it’s not. It’s just how it is, how it’s always been. Jews really ought to be taxed for the privilege of being amongst us. A special jazya tax for the Jews. Or they can take up their things and move to Israel, or try their luck in combat. The simple truth is, their behavior earns them hate of all and any people they come in contact with. Nobody likes them.

    Read More
  116. Just you look at when the story of 6 million dead Jews (an official WW2 account of Jewish casualties) begun (for those 10 Murican newspapers a detective was researching at least):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dda-0Q_XUhk

    http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/search/pages/results/?state=&date1=1836&date2=1922&proxtext=6000000+jews&x=11&y=17&dateFilterType=yearRange&rows=20&searchType=basic

    In 1915! Way before WW2 started, don’t you think?

    Who were the owners of those newspapers, what do you think, hmm? You get one guess. :)

    Read More
  117. @Jefferson
    "Black lives don’t matter to other blacks….they slaughter each other relentlessly."

    Black lives only matter to Blacks when racial outsiders like Whites kill one of their tribesmen.

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.

    Just 1 White on Black homicide angers Blacks a lot more than 1,000 Black on Black homicides.

    Or 10,000, or 20,000 or, or, or. Since MLK, 1 million B-on-B murders? Some “brotherhood” they have. And still, if it was that many B-on-W murders, Whites of today would be demanding “tolerance”. Of course, those of us capable of and willing to shoot back would have solved that particular ratio long ago. Instead, we move further away, build new cities and civilizations, known as the Suburbs.

    Read More
  118. @Anon
    There is something to what Jefferson says.

    You are of an older generation of Asian-Americans and a Christian to boot, so you think differently.

    Yellows are a slavish race and wanna fit into the prevailing narrative.

    Even though US was most instrumental in dividing your nation and giving half to Stalin(it was US idea to have Russians come in) and even though US bombing of the North was near-genocidal---and even though US foreign policy is geared to keep divided Korea forever to use SK as a puppet client--, you dutifully became a Christian and serve the USA.
    Back when you were growing up, US was proudly Christian and still dominated by Anglo-Americans. So, slavish and dog-like Koreans followed that model of Americanism. Koreans, like all yellows, worship authority and power, and US seemed so powerful. So, you became like a wanna-be American in spirituality, politics, and world-view.

    Unlike Korea that modernized without sovereignty--under Japanese and then under American domination--, Japan modernized with sovereignty and thus developed more of an independent mindset. Also, its geographical separation from China also helped it develop more of a unique mindset. (But as Japanese dependency on the US continues long after end of WWII, Japan too is losing its sense of national uniqueness and sovereignty and turning into a material society with no identity, heritage, and meaning. Japanese live on junk food and junk anime culture.)
    In contrast, because Korea as stuck next to China as a kind of vassal state, the Korean cultural mindset is to follow and imitate the Big Power. It used to be China for 2000 yrs. Now, it's the US, and South Koreans are the biggest dogs in the world. And you are a prime example.

    Of course, a lot of good and even great things were achieved by Koreans under foreign rule. Though Kors bitch about Japan, Japan did much to modernize Korea and bring it into the 20th century. And thanks to US protection and markets, SK was able to economically develop and make considerable progress. But it is nevertheless a whore nation without sovereignty. It is also a coward nation. Little Israel defends itself by itself even though surrounded by hostile nations. But even though SK has a much bigger population and demographic advantage over NK -- some say SK economy is 30x that of NK --, SK is still a whore-bitch that begs for US protection from their starving national brethren up north. Also, if SK is really under threat, shouldn't south koreans stay and protect their own nation? But no, they run from their own nation and come to the US and other nations. Also, SK boys now act like pansy boys. And these girly men ask Americans to defend them. What a nation of pussy cowards. They scream about threat from the starving north, act like girly boys, and hide behind uncle sam for protection.. while so many Kors wanna leave their country and settle elsewhere permanently.

    Of course, US is now a very different nation, and the world is very different. There was a time in the Cold War when it was US vs USSR and Red China. And SK fell into US orbit. As communism sucks, it had no choice but to be US's bitch. Same with Japan and Taiwan. As China and USSR backed NK, SK had to stick with US.

    But Cold War is long gone. China wants good relations with both NK and SK, and indeed is now closer to SK. Russia is no longer an enemy and wants good relations with both NK and SK. Cold War is so over. And SK is happy to deal with China and Russia.
    So, what it the problem? It is NK and US. NK is ruled by a shitter, but US also deserves much blame. Surely, US knows the Cold War is over. Surely, US knows NK poses no threat to any nation despite its bad boy antics. NK poses a threat to whom? China, Japan, Russia, the US? It may pose some threat to SK, but even norks know they cannot conquer SK. Also, if NK attacked first, NO NATION, not even China, would come to its side. They would all condemn NK and side with SK. US could end all sanctions and tensions with NK if it wanted to. If US did with NK what it is now doing with Cuba, then NK will likely gradually come to the table.

    So, why does US still act like NK poses some kind of grave threat?
    Two reasons.

    1. Jews. Jews don't give a shit about NK. The ONLY reason NK became an issue was because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. That's it. Jews don't give a shit about human rights. They had no problem dealing with Saudis. They don't care about Palestinians who live like Kors under Japper rule. NK became a pariah nation ONLY because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. (Never mind Israel was the closest ally of Apartheid South Africa during the Cold War.)

    2. China. US now sees China as the main rival in the Pacific, and it wants to use SK as its puppet indefinitely. If tensions were to fade between north and south and if two koreas were to slowly unite, US military will have to move out of SK. Also, as there will be so much work to be done in reunification, Kors will become more nationalist in their mindset. In order to fuse south and north, they would need to emphasize what they have in common: race, history, culture, language. Thus, Korea would become less global and more nationalist. And without US military presence, it will grow closer to China, thus reverting to its traditional role in Asia.
    This is what US doesn't want. So, it keeps ramping up tensions. Even though NK is nutty, its nuclear ambitions are purely defensive, esp in light of US criminal acts in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. What happened to Gaddafi for his goodwill gesture? He got bombed and tortured to death, and Hillary laughed about it. Neocons of GOP and Lib Zionists of Democratic Party are all warmongering sickos.

    So, in order to keep the two koreas separate forever, US keeps stirring up tensions. It ignores all its violation of international agreements and just blames NK. Now, if we see NK actions without context, they do seem nutty. But when we see them in context of American international behavior in Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine, then north korea is acting rationally. At least as much as Israel that has 300 nukes for defensive purposes. Even an evil regime can have rational reasons. NK regime is evil, but it is acting rationally since US foreign policy is evil(though most Americans are not).
    US also tries to keep the two koreas separate by making South Korea fundamentally different from the north culturally, ideologically, and even demographically. NK and SK, due to long separation, are different in many ways. But they have one thing in common: race, ancestry, traditional history, language. So, despite differences in politics and economics, both side still core commonalities that may allow reunification. But now SK is into multiculturalism. In a nation where women don't want to have kids and where so many people want to leave forever, SK is now welcoming the world to invade like Europe is doing. As SK academics, elites, and media people are all brainwashed by US globalism, they think they must follow and join the US-dominated order. Now, Kerry says the world should be without borders.

    So, with more Koreans leaving Korea and with more non-Koreans becoming 'new Koreans' and more Koreans becoming racially mixed, in time SK will become so different from NK not only in economics and politics but in race and identity and demographics. Instead of NK and SK being one race/people divided only by politics and economics, they will really become two different peoples. While NK will maintain its racial integrity, SK will become like Latin America with massive immigration and race-mixing. And these 'new koreans' will not see NK as the same race and people. (Indeed, even white wanna-be South Koreans who get plastic surgery or dream of marrying non-koreans feel ashamed of being Korean and want fuse with the West than with their racial brethren up north.)

    And then, SK will never reunite with NK, and America's great crime of having divided an innocent nation will be permanent and SK will be US's bitch-whore forever. (In contrast, Vietnam is united forever.) What the US and USSR did to Korea was not much different from what Germany and USSR did to Poland in 39. The great powers divided an innocent nation, and both sides decapitated the elites.
    In NK, the USSR wiped out the native leftists and installed puppet Kim Il Sung.
    In the SK, US backed Rhee and favored collaborators under the Japanese. And US allowed the Rhee regime to exterminate 300,000 people in a massive bloodbath that went far beyond Katyn. SK elites became so slavish to the US because without US support, they would have been removed from power for having collaborated with the Japanese. And this slavish mentality lives on to this day.

    SK now gets a black African to run for it in the olympics. SK girls get plastic surgery and dye their hair blonde to look white. SK boys put on girly makeup and try to look like white girls too. SK pop culture is worship of black thug culture. K-pop that is the main culture of SK is just a korean fantasy of Koreans being white or black. It doesn't promote and sell koreans as koreans but koreans as white/black wanna-be's.

    And with 1 million Koreans in the US, Korean-American way now is the template for SK itself. SK looks to Korean-America as model. So, what is the Korean-American Way all about? It's about race-mixing galore and loss of identity and worship of black culture and homo culture and celebrity garbage. As SK follows this Korean-American model, it will become just a imitation of California. And it will become so different from the North in culture and race that it will never unite with the North. SK will just become like a commonwealth like Puerto Rico. Or just a defacto state of US like Hawaii.

    When US was mostly white, Christian, and patriotic, many SK's looked to those modes as the model for Korea. But as US is now ruled by Jews, homos, open borders globalists, and promotes interracialism, those themes are the main template for SK.
    Like I said, yellows love to imitate and follow since they lack originality, individuality, and sense of sovereignty. This slavishness is esp big among Koreans since Korea has a long history of sucking up to big china. Now, it sucks up to Big US that is a totally degenerate nation.

    While older Korean-Americans may have voted Republican and been 'conservative', things are totally different for younger generation of Kor-Americans and Asian-Americans in general. Since all the rich cities, top colleges, pop culture, and media are so Liberal and 'leftist', most young Asian-Americans go that way because they worship power, privilege, wealth, and 'coolness'. This is even truer among Korean-Americans since they tend to be impulsive, imitative, childish, and earnest in their sucking up to whatever is 'cool' and 'hip' and 'powerful'. Since US worships Jews, homos, and blacks, younger generation of Kor-Americans are into worship of that stuff.

    Even though younger Korean-Americans disagree with you on lots of issues, you and they have one thing in common. Both you and they arrived at values and attitudes due to slavishness to the great power. When you were young, US was still about white power, Christianity, majority power, and etc. So, you came to respect and admire those things about America.

    Today, US is all about minority privilege, homo worship, Jewish supremacy, black cool. So, today's young Korean-Americans imitate and follow those themes and narratives.

    If you want a taste of what most young Korean-Americans are into, go to twitter and check out Jay Caspian Kang(journalist) and look at his tweets and those of his friends. They just suck up to what is the new prevailing Americanism... just like older generation of Koreans were into the prevailing Americanism when they were young(when Christianity was big in America). They are all about BLM. It doesn't matter that blacks may be committing violence against Asians. Slavish Korean-Americans feel the 'cool deficit' and wanna be cool by being pro-black, thus having 'black cool' rubbed off on them.

    The nature of Korean-America is easy to understand. It is whatever happens to be prevail in American culture. Koreans lack agency and just imitate the Big Power.
    So, Korean Right is all about waving the American Flag and Uncle Sam. and Korean Left is all about imitating BLM and waving the homo flag.
    Asian news says that 80% of SK millennials are 'progressive', only 19% is conservative. Addicted to pop culture, homo propaganda emanating from the US, and American PC that Korean academics pick up and imitate, the future of SK is a mere doglike servility and imitation of whatever happens in America.

    So, Jefferson isn't entirely wrong. Look at the younger generation of Korean-Americans, and they do 'hate' white people. Not because they had bad experiences with whites but because they are slavish imitators. Since US academia and media(that are controlled by Jews) spread anti-white propaganda and agenda all over, it's only natural that Korean-Americans would jump on the bandwagon of anti-white PC. So, even as they prefer to live in white communities and send their kids to white schools, they grow up with PC, MLK worship, rap music, and anti-white cult as their main worldview. Since Koreans don't know how to think for themselves, they just follow the cultural zeitgeist.
    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity. It's because you too are dog-like follower.

    Harsh truths. But still the truth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Harsh truths. But still the truth.
     
    That was neither harsh nor truthful. Just deranged.
  119. KenH says:

    What does BLM want? To create a false narrative of white police perfidy and violence and black victimhood. This is just another branch of black victimology that they plan to parlay into yet another race hustle and perpetual cash windfall. After all, race hustling and fomenting hatred of whitey sure beats getting an education/edumacation and busting your buns at a regular job.

    BLM still won’t acknowledge that 93% of blacks are killed not by whites or white cops, but by their fellow blacks. The left in general and blacks in particular, simply ignore or deny facts when it doesn’t further their cause.

    Most “racist” white cops enter the force with few or no racial convictions and have race consciousness rudely forced on them after contact with blacks, Latinos and other wondrous, but violent third world minorities.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moses
    Yep. I came to the same conclusion. BLM is just another race hustle about money. Just like Sharpton and Jackson.

    Just follow the money trail. BLM agitators get money and/or jobs. Will be interesting to see when there's no more whitey to spread around.
  120. @asshat


    What in either of my comments led you to believe that I blame others “because I’m a failure”? You know nothing of what I do in life, nor how successful I am

     

    the 88 in your name is an almost sure sign that you're an idiot.
    Now I know I'm generalizing, but the two are pretty correlated.
    You'd know all about that since youre a race realist not a white dindu complaining as usual, right?

    It’s my birth year, genius. But you can assume all you want. Hey, is your hat an ass or is your ass a hat? Same shit.

    My comments, nor my username on Unz review is not a measure of my success, genius.

    Read More
  121. Rehmat says:
    @Boris

    tell what you really are?
     
    I'm your intellectual superior. But then, that's most people.

    How could you be superior to anyone while you proved beyond any doubt that your brain is hanging between your legs.

    Shalom and keep patting your Zionist butts.

    Read More
  122. Eustace Tilley (not) [AKA "Schiller/Nietzsche"] says:
    @WorkingClass
    I'm a working class white guy living in a majority black city in the deep south. I know a lot of black people who work for a living and are not criminals. They don't like the gang bangers any more than I do. They are the victims of black on black crime. I live in a mixed neighborhood which is less dangerous than the all black neighborhoods. Still, the swat teams here manage to break into the wrong address and shoot the wrong people. The police are the only thing keeping the gangs of thugs down. But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.

    Black Lives Matter is funded, I am told, by Mr. Soros. What I would tell BLM is they are being used to exacerbate racial strife in America. Keeping black and white at each others throats is public policy. What I would tell comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer, is that police brutality and criminality are real. That the war on drugs with its vast gulag of jails and prisons is real.

    We all have a common enemy. The Police State and the scumbags who own it. We will have neither liberty nor peace and prosperity until we unite against our oppressors. Not BLM. Not Mexicans. Not queers or feminists or cry babies on campus. Not white racists or red necks. But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    Fellow Proletarian Intellectual:

    I am deeply touched by your love for Man. Going by your nom de plume, you are a sincere leftist who wants to get along with his multi-hued and -gendered brothers and sisters in the Paradise to Come when the proletariat has finally liquidated the Tres Haute Bourgeoisie.

    But here’s the problem: The feminists are supporters of Hillary, who is the whore of the .01%. The homosexual transvestites are supported by PayPal (that is, the directors of PayPal) in their fight with North Carolina. BLM is funded by Soros. Fuckerberg wants to bust the borders and flood the USA with aliens. Sheldon Adelson wants the same.

    It delights my heart that you care only for class, not the trivia of race and gender that the rest of the planet is deeply concerned about. You need to step into a time machine set for 1914 and join in an animated discussion with your fellow proletarians about why the German proletariat will never, never fight their class comrades in the Russian proletariat. Their common enemies are the Kaiser and the Tsar!

    Then, come back to 2016 a sadder and a wiser man.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WorkingClass
    "I am deeply touched by your love for Man. Going by your nom de plume, you are a sincere leftist who wants to get along with his multi-hued and -gendered brothers and sisters in the Paradise to Come when the proletariat has finally liquidated the Tres Haute Bourgeoisie."

    Thank you for this friendly response. I am not wedded to ideology inasmuch as I view both the workers paradise and the free market utopia as castles in the air. But you have correctly diagnosed my heart. My heart is with the Wobblies. I would press the limits of human nature to allow maximum peace and prosperity for the people of earth. Feminists, Mexicans, African Americans and Social Justice Warriors are not my enemies in the same way that the policeman's dog is not my enemy. Jews, Muslims and Christians are as Jews, Muslims and Christians do. As you say I "care only for class, not the trivia of race and gender".
  123. @Eustace Tilley (not)


    Fellow Proletarian Intellectual:

    I am deeply touched by your love for Man. Going by your nom de plume, you are a sincere leftist who wants to get along with his multi-hued and -gendered brothers and sisters in the Paradise to Come when the proletariat has finally liquidated the Tres Haute Bourgeoisie.

    But here's the problem: The feminists are supporters of Hillary, who is the whore of the .01%. The homosexual transvestites are supported by PayPal (that is, the directors of PayPal) in their fight with North Carolina. BLM is funded by Soros. Fuckerberg wants to bust the borders and flood the USA with aliens. Sheldon Adelson wants the same.

    It delights my heart that you care only for class, not the trivia of race and gender that the rest of the planet is deeply concerned about. You need to step into a time machine set for 1914 and join in an animated discussion with your fellow proletarians about why the German proletariat will never, never fight their class comrades in the Russian proletariat. Their common enemies are the Kaiser and the Tsar!

    Then, come back to 2016 a sadder and a wiser man.

    “I am deeply touched by your love for Man. Going by your nom de plume, you are a sincere leftist who wants to get along with his multi-hued and -gendered brothers and sisters in the Paradise to Come when the proletariat has finally liquidated the Tres Haute Bourgeoisie.”

    Thank you for this friendly response. I am not wedded to ideology inasmuch as I view both the workers paradise and the free market utopia as castles in the air. But you have correctly diagnosed my heart. My heart is with the Wobblies. I would press the limits of human nature to allow maximum peace and prosperity for the people of earth. Feminists, Mexicans, African Americans and Social Justice Warriors are not my enemies in the same way that the policeman’s dog is not my enemy. Jews, Muslims and Christians are as Jews, Muslims and Christians do. As you say I “care only for class, not the trivia of race and gender”.

    Read More
  124. Boris says:
    @Khan Bodin
    Liberal, atheistical, secular "Jew." You are a Jew by origins. I can tell. I can smell it on you like musk! You and your liberal Jewish ilk are the reason why Jews as the people are so hated. Everywhere you come, the hate of your kind comes with as well. Must be something in the air, or it is perhaps your behavior which is responsible for it. But don't question your behavior, liberal Jew. Wait until someone else does it for you.

    And you are an imbecilic, very stupid creature, secular Jew. You cannot intellectually best even the squirrel, you imbecile. People are laughing at you and your moronic intellect, Jew. You are a mong, not even an intellectual dwarf.

    Mong:
    Adj.
    i) lacking in cerebral ability: general retardation
    ii) slang for spastic, but used against a person who says or does something completely idiotic by accident or without realization. This makes every witness simultaneously raise their hands to their shoulders and shake 'em while sticking their tongue in their lower lip and making 'urrgh' noises
    iii) a derogatory verb commonly used to describe the state of one's lack of common sense
    iv) an abbreviation for "mentally wrong"
    v) someone that is not right in the head, very dopey or even someone that has been on drugs

    Liberal, atheistical, secular “Jew.” You are a Jew by origins. I can tell. I can smell it on you like musk!

    Is that a new Firefoz plugin?

    You and your liberal Jewish ilk are the reason why Jews as the people are so hated.

    Jews were hated way before I came along.

    But don’t question your behavior, liberal Jew. Wait until someone else does it for you.

    Okay.

    And you are an imbecilic, very stupid creature, secular Jew.

    You sound angry. And impotent.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBM9-SNKz6A

    Read More
  125. @Priss Factor
    "Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable."

    When they remain a Gomezian minority. But when they turn into a Fuentesian majority, they get all macho and give middle finger to gringo and imitate Negroes.

    Its like your stomach can digest a taco, or two tacos or even three. But if you shove 50 tacos into your stomach, it's just gonna explode and turn totally taco.
    Your stomach can digest only so many tacos.
    US can assimilate only so many non-white minorities.

    It seems to me that Mexican is like the Liberal.

    Any opinion or taste is allowable while they are an observable minority. When they have achieved, or at least can claim, majority status, the gloves come off, the bans are announced and the Memory Hole gets warmed up.

    Read More
  126. Jaego says:
    @Svigor
    Maybe blacks want things a lot like they are now. They have a set of perpetual grievances to mobilize their demographic at will. Whenever the leadership is low on funds, they can go and shake this money tree. They also have mostly decent policing, and a government and establishment that are hyper-sensitive to them, their needs, and their complaints (regardless of merit). They have a majority snookered by the delusions of racial equality and white guilt.

    What's not to like? Trouble is, they believe their own BS, and actually seem to think a majority non-white America will be more amenable to their concerns and demands. Which is pretty hilarious, when you think about it. Favelas and shantytowns are in their not-too-distant future, but thinking ahead has never been their forte.

    If they had any sense, they'd be protecting the white demographic as their most precious natural resource, because it is.

    Yes, the fable of the Goose that lays the golden egg is well beyond their intelligence. Just kill the Goose and eat it.

    Read More
  127. I’d like to read an article from Fred supporting the advantage of having millions upon millions of Mexicans in the US. As a taxpayer, I fund them. Why should I?

    Fred, I would guess that your veiled racist posts regarding the negro plague are safe for you to post. Bring up the Mexican in a post. Explain to the American readers how they are any better than the negro. La Raza and blacklivesmatter, how do the two organizations differ? Both are aggressively undermining traditional White society here in the US. Both groups are at war with White Americans.

    You have turned sides, which is your decision. Enlighten us on the positives of having your surrogates taking swaths of our land and billions of dollars. Just how does that benefit the average American White guy?

    LOL, and you complain about negros. Stay in Mexico, Fred.

    Read More
  128. Twinkie says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Hispanics are, yes (except Cubans).
     
    This is changing. Cubans used to be dependable republicans. Not so much today. Miami-Dade County is ground zero for Cubans and is today pretty reliably Democrat. It's not a seamless fit however, as Tom Wolfe noted in his Back to Blood, the Cubans have zero compassion for the American negroes, Haitians, and Jamaicans. Also, the Cubans have drawn in behind them a large and growing population of Central Americans due to predominance of Spanish over English. We also see some real strongholds like Weston in Broward County now called colloquially "Westonzuela" for all the Venezuelans. Colombians have blended a bit better along the lines of Guatemalans, Nicaraguans, and Salvadorans. About all that's missing is a large Mexican population (disliked intensely by all other Central Americans as well as Cubans), Chileans, and Argentines. And of course as the financial capital of Latin America, Miami (Brickell and East of Biscayne Blvd) and Miami Beach are chock full of the wealthiest elites from all Latin America (and even Spain).

    Anyway, the point, again, was that the negroes are unwanted and disliked by all the Latinos regardless of origin and despite the Cuban shift from republican to democrat party. Old school Cubans are still strongly republican, but younger Cubans are voting with the other Latino groups.

    Old school Cubans are still strongly republican, but younger Cubans are voting with the other Latino groups.

    Yes, this is true, but not only limited to Cubans. The trend among the young, regardless of race or ethnicity, is toward the Democrats of late.

    Read More
  129. Twinkie says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    I think a lot more Mexicans would assimilate if we would stop mollycoddling them and tell them in no uncertain terms that they will not be allowed to play the victim card.

    My job requires me to visit many different neighborhoods. From the ground level, I get to see everything from the $2 million mansion homes to the places you wouldn't want to get caught in after dark. Many of the older suburban neighborhoods---the places that once nestled young White families 40 years ago---are now overrun by Hispanics, with a few Asians (mostly Hmong or Laotian, I'm guessing, from the names) and the elderly White remnant living among them. It's one of the unmistakable symptoms of a neighborhood in decline.

    But I'm continually impressed by how "normal" the young Hispanic children are. Sure, their parents strike me as typical, smarmy, lying-ass Mexicans---the kind of spics who would stab you in the ass for a candy bar---but the kids are delightful. They all speak English, usually without any trace of a Cholo accent. They may be bilingual, but they seem to have very little interest in speaking Spanish. And they want to wear the same clothes, eat the same foods, play the same video games, and watch the same TV shows as as all the White children of comparable age. A few years later, when they become teenagers, the girls like to flaunt their figures in Lululemon halter tops and listen to club music. Not exactly the wisest choices in and of themselves, but it's the same thing the young White girls are doing, which was my point.

    Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable. The single biggest factor preventing them from doing so is the White liberal culture that wants to "raise Hispanic consciousness" by first deliberately creating an identity ghetto for these people and then by attaching perks for those who maintain such an identity. Absent that, Mexican assimilation would go much quicker and smoother, for they do not seem to possess the inherent incapacity for White society as, for example, the Blacks do.

    By the way, none of this should be taken to mean that I want any more Mexicans in the USA. I am pro-Trump and pro-Wall. But I think we could do a much better job with the Mexicans already here by simply dropping the victimization game.

    Mexicans seem to me to be eminently assimilable.

    Regardless of how they seem to you, the statistics are pretty clear. Mexicans assimilate poorly in all three aspects of assimilation as defined by the Manhattan Institute, namely, economic, cultural, and civic. That has not change for a very long time. And tragically for all of us Americans, their progeny in the United States continue to lag other scions of other immigrant groups. In fact, their crime rate is something like seven times higher than that of their immigrant forefathers.

    The single biggest factor preventing them from doing so is the White liberal culture that wants to “raise Hispanic consciousness”

    Or it could be the fact that the Mexicans immigrants, by and large, are low IQ rural peasants or urban underclass.

    But I think we could do a much better job with the Mexicans already here by simply dropping the victimization game.

    I agree there. Drop affirmative action and insist on English and assimilation, period.

    Read More
  130. Twinkie says:
    @Anon
    There is something to what Jefferson says.

    You are of an older generation of Asian-Americans and a Christian to boot, so you think differently.

    Yellows are a slavish race and wanna fit into the prevailing narrative.

    Even though US was most instrumental in dividing your nation and giving half to Stalin(it was US idea to have Russians come in) and even though US bombing of the North was near-genocidal---and even though US foreign policy is geared to keep divided Korea forever to use SK as a puppet client--, you dutifully became a Christian and serve the USA.
    Back when you were growing up, US was proudly Christian and still dominated by Anglo-Americans. So, slavish and dog-like Koreans followed that model of Americanism. Koreans, like all yellows, worship authority and power, and US seemed so powerful. So, you became like a wanna-be American in spirituality, politics, and world-view.

    Unlike Korea that modernized without sovereignty--under Japanese and then under American domination--, Japan modernized with sovereignty and thus developed more of an independent mindset. Also, its geographical separation from China also helped it develop more of a unique mindset. (But as Japanese dependency on the US continues long after end of WWII, Japan too is losing its sense of national uniqueness and sovereignty and turning into a material society with no identity, heritage, and meaning. Japanese live on junk food and junk anime culture.)
    In contrast, because Korea as stuck next to China as a kind of vassal state, the Korean cultural mindset is to follow and imitate the Big Power. It used to be China for 2000 yrs. Now, it's the US, and South Koreans are the biggest dogs in the world. And you are a prime example.

    Of course, a lot of good and even great things were achieved by Koreans under foreign rule. Though Kors bitch about Japan, Japan did much to modernize Korea and bring it into the 20th century. And thanks to US protection and markets, SK was able to economically develop and make considerable progress. But it is nevertheless a whore nation without sovereignty. It is also a coward nation. Little Israel defends itself by itself even though surrounded by hostile nations. But even though SK has a much bigger population and demographic advantage over NK -- some say SK economy is 30x that of NK --, SK is still a whore-bitch that begs for US protection from their starving national brethren up north. Also, if SK is really under threat, shouldn't south koreans stay and protect their own nation? But no, they run from their own nation and come to the US and other nations. Also, SK boys now act like pansy boys. And these girly men ask Americans to defend them. What a nation of pussy cowards. They scream about threat from the starving north, act like girly boys, and hide behind uncle sam for protection.. while so many Kors wanna leave their country and settle elsewhere permanently.

    Of course, US is now a very different nation, and the world is very different. There was a time in the Cold War when it was US vs USSR and Red China. And SK fell into US orbit. As communism sucks, it had no choice but to be US's bitch. Same with Japan and Taiwan. As China and USSR backed NK, SK had to stick with US.

    But Cold War is long gone. China wants good relations with both NK and SK, and indeed is now closer to SK. Russia is no longer an enemy and wants good relations with both NK and SK. Cold War is so over. And SK is happy to deal with China and Russia.
    So, what it the problem? It is NK and US. NK is ruled by a shitter, but US also deserves much blame. Surely, US knows the Cold War is over. Surely, US knows NK poses no threat to any nation despite its bad boy antics. NK poses a threat to whom? China, Japan, Russia, the US? It may pose some threat to SK, but even norks know they cannot conquer SK. Also, if NK attacked first, NO NATION, not even China, would come to its side. They would all condemn NK and side with SK. US could end all sanctions and tensions with NK if it wanted to. If US did with NK what it is now doing with Cuba, then NK will likely gradually come to the table.

    So, why does US still act like NK poses some kind of grave threat?
    Two reasons.

    1. Jews. Jews don't give a shit about NK. The ONLY reason NK became an issue was because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. That's it. Jews don't give a shit about human rights. They had no problem dealing with Saudis. They don't care about Palestinians who live like Kors under Japper rule. NK became a pariah nation ONLY because it did business with enemy nations of Israel. (Never mind Israel was the closest ally of Apartheid South Africa during the Cold War.)

    2. China. US now sees China as the main rival in the Pacific, and it wants to use SK as its puppet indefinitely. If tensions were to fade between north and south and if two koreas were to slowly unite, US military will have to move out of SK. Also, as there will be so much work to be done in reunification, Kors will become more nationalist in their mindset. In order to fuse south and north, they would need to emphasize what they have in common: race, history, culture, language. Thus, Korea would become less global and more nationalist. And without US military presence, it will grow closer to China, thus reverting to its traditional role in Asia.
    This is what US doesn't want. So, it keeps ramping up tensions. Even though NK is nutty, its nuclear ambitions are purely defensive, esp in light of US criminal acts in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. What happened to Gaddafi for his goodwill gesture? He got bombed and tortured to death, and Hillary laughed about it. Neocons of GOP and Lib Zionists of Democratic Party are all warmongering sickos.

    So, in order to keep the two koreas separate forever, US keeps stirring up tensions. It ignores all its violation of international agreements and just blames NK. Now, if we see NK actions without context, they do seem nutty. But when we see them in context of American international behavior in Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine, then north korea is acting rationally. At least as much as Israel that has 300 nukes for defensive purposes. Even an evil regime can have rational reasons. NK regime is evil, but it is acting rationally since US foreign policy is evil(though most Americans are not).
    US also tries to keep the two koreas separate by making South Korea fundamentally different from the north culturally, ideologically, and even demographically. NK and SK, due to long separation, are different in many ways. But they have one thing in common: race, ancestry, traditional history, language. So, despite differences in politics and economics, both side still core commonalities that may allow reunification. But now SK is into multiculturalism. In a nation where women don't want to have kids and where so many people want to leave forever, SK is now welcoming the world to invade like Europe is doing. As SK academics, elites, and media people are all brainwashed by US globalism, they think they must follow and join the US-dominated order. Now, Kerry says the world should be without borders.

    So, with more Koreans leaving Korea and with more non-Koreans becoming 'new Koreans' and more Koreans becoming racially mixed, in time SK will become so different from NK not only in economics and politics but in race and identity and demographics. Instead of NK and SK being one race/people divided only by politics and economics, they will really become two different peoples. While NK will maintain its racial integrity, SK will become like Latin America with massive immigration and race-mixing. And these 'new koreans' will not see NK as the same race and people. (Indeed, even white wanna-be South Koreans who get plastic surgery or dream of marrying non-koreans feel ashamed of being Korean and want fuse with the West than with their racial brethren up north.)

    And then, SK will never reunite with NK, and America's great crime of having divided an innocent nation will be permanent and SK will be US's bitch-whore forever. (In contrast, Vietnam is united forever.) What the US and USSR did to Korea was not much different from what Germany and USSR did to Poland in 39. The great powers divided an innocent nation, and both sides decapitated the elites.
    In NK, the USSR wiped out the native leftists and installed puppet Kim Il Sung.
    In the SK, US backed Rhee and favored collaborators under the Japanese. And US allowed the Rhee regime to exterminate 300,000 people in a massive bloodbath that went far beyond Katyn. SK elites became so slavish to the US because without US support, they would have been removed from power for having collaborated with the Japanese. And this slavish mentality lives on to this day.

    SK now gets a black African to run for it in the olympics. SK girls get plastic surgery and dye their hair blonde to look white. SK boys put on girly makeup and try to look like white girls too. SK pop culture is worship of black thug culture. K-pop that is the main culture of SK is just a korean fantasy of Koreans being white or black. It doesn't promote and sell koreans as koreans but koreans as white/black wanna-be's.

    And with 1 million Koreans in the US, Korean-American way now is the template for SK itself. SK looks to Korean-America as model. So, what is the Korean-American Way all about? It's about race-mixing galore and loss of identity and worship of black culture and homo culture and celebrity garbage. As SK follows this Korean-American model, it will become just a imitation of California. And it will become so different from the North in culture and race that it will never unite with the North. SK will just become like a commonwealth like Puerto Rico. Or just a defacto state of US like Hawaii.

    When US was mostly white, Christian, and patriotic, many SK's looked to those modes as the model for Korea. But as US is now ruled by Jews, homos, open borders globalists, and promotes interracialism, those themes are the main template for SK.
    Like I said, yellows love to imitate and follow since they lack originality, individuality, and sense of sovereignty. This slavishness is esp big among Koreans since Korea has a long history of sucking up to big china. Now, it sucks up to Big US that is a totally degenerate nation.

    While older Korean-Americans may have voted Republican and been 'conservative', things are totally different for younger generation of Kor-Americans and Asian-Americans in general. Since all the rich cities, top colleges, pop culture, and media are so Liberal and 'leftist', most young Asian-Americans go that way because they worship power, privilege, wealth, and 'coolness'. This is even truer among Korean-Americans since they tend to be impulsive, imitative, childish, and earnest in their sucking up to whatever is 'cool' and 'hip' and 'powerful'. Since US worships Jews, homos, and blacks, younger generation of Kor-Americans are into worship of that stuff.

    Even though younger Korean-Americans disagree with you on lots of issues, you and they have one thing in common. Both you and they arrived at values and attitudes due to slavishness to the great power. When you were young, US was still about white power, Christianity, majority power, and etc. So, you came to respect and admire those things about America.

    Today, US is all about minority privilege, homo worship, Jewish supremacy, black cool. So, today's young Korean-Americans imitate and follow those themes and narratives.

    If you want a taste of what most young Korean-Americans are into, go to twitter and check out Jay Caspian Kang(journalist) and look at his tweets and those of his friends. They just suck up to what is the new prevailing Americanism... just like older generation of Koreans were into the prevailing Americanism when they were young(when Christianity was big in America). They are all about BLM. It doesn't matter that blacks may be committing violence against Asians. Slavish Korean-Americans feel the 'cool deficit' and wanna be cool by being pro-black, thus having 'black cool' rubbed off on them.

    The nature of Korean-America is easy to understand. It is whatever happens to be prevail in American culture. Koreans lack agency and just imitate the Big Power.
    So, Korean Right is all about waving the American Flag and Uncle Sam. and Korean Left is all about imitating BLM and waving the homo flag.
    Asian news says that 80% of SK millennials are 'progressive', only 19% is conservative. Addicted to pop culture, homo propaganda emanating from the US, and American PC that Korean academics pick up and imitate, the future of SK is a mere doglike servility and imitation of whatever happens in America.

    So, Jefferson isn't entirely wrong. Look at the younger generation of Korean-Americans, and they do 'hate' white people. Not because they had bad experiences with whites but because they are slavish imitators. Since US academia and media(that are controlled by Jews) spread anti-white propaganda and agenda all over, it's only natural that Korean-Americans would jump on the bandwagon of anti-white PC. So, even as they prefer to live in white communities and send their kids to white schools, they grow up with PC, MLK worship, rap music, and anti-white cult as their main worldview. Since Koreans don't know how to think for themselves, they just follow the cultural zeitgeist.
    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity. It's because you too are dog-like follower.

    Yellows are a slavish race

    You could have saved yourself a lot of keystrokes and left it at that. The rest of your long, incoherent, and rambling ranting adds nothing further to that statement.

    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity.

    1. I never said I was Korean.

    2. I was brought to the U.S. by my parents, and grew up here partly. Being an American is an organic part of my identity, as I grew up eating PB&J, watching “Family Ties,” and pledging allegiance to the flag every morning in class, and going to Sunday school and church.

    3. You should make up your mind on whether conforming to American social norms is being “slavish” or assimilation. The problem with people like you is that you play “heads I win, tails you lose.”

    It’s because you too are dog-like follower.

    “Dog-like” is a compliment, thanks. I keep a large pack of dogs. Dogs are loyal, dependable, courageous, and hardy. They ask for very little and in turn give a lot more. If more people were like dogs, it would be a better world. I’ve found dogs to be more trustworthy than most people.

    In this world, there are sheep, there are wolves, and there are (sheep) dogs. I chose to be a dog.

    As for being a follower, perhaps you didn’t learn what I learned while carrying arms for my adapted country: “To be a leader, first learn to follow.”

    Read More
    • Agree: Talha
    • Replies: @dcite

    You should make up your mind on whether conforming to American social norms is being “slavish” or assimilation. The problem with people like you is that you play “heads I win, tails you lose.
     
    Good point Twinkie. Easy to get confused here, and some people are not wired to be pleased.

    btw, "Slavish" used to be applied to Slavic people. Supposedly that's where the word came from. Nowadays they are among the least slavish in their attitudes when the Powers That Be want to decide things for them.

    , @Talha
    Dear Twinkie,

    I honestly don't know how people can link such wonderfully distinct people (Javanese, Malay, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, etc.) with their varied cultures and histories into one fat category. It truly boggles my mind.

    The sagacious Rumi (may God raise his rank) at times used the loyalty of dogs to teach spiritual lessons on approaching one's Master:
    "Listen to the moan of a dog for its master.
    That whining is the connection.
    There are loving dogs
    no one knows the names of.
    Give your life
    to be one of them.”

    That was his wisdom on prayer, even if it is never answered in this world.

    May God preserve you and yours.
  131. Twinkie says:
    @Jim Christian
    Harsh truths. But still the truth.

    Harsh truths. But still the truth.

    That was neither harsh nor truthful. Just deranged.

    Read More
  132. Maj. Kong says:
    @Jefferson
    "No, Erik is correct. The danger to your group, generally, is outside groups. ?"

    Erik is 1,000% wrong. White America poses zero danger to Black America and statistics back me, statistics don't back you.

    If Deportation of illegals (Muslims, etc.), becomes Repatriation, that may change.

    Imagine a US where the average black would think moving to Africa is a good idea.

    Read More
  133. Fred says:

    For example, in my neighborhood I would want the police to shoot looters and arsonists.

    Who needs cops to do this? Is Fred lazy?

    Riots only occur when people choose to stand down and allow them. Tolerance for that is apt to be drying up rapidly, and will be utterly absent when the Great Asset Mania and concurrent Credit Bubble end.

    Read More
  134. dcite says:
    @Twinkie

    Yellows are a slavish race
     
    You could have saved yourself a lot of keystrokes and left it at that. The rest of your long, incoherent, and rambling ranting adds nothing further to that statement.

    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity.
     
    1. I never said I was Korean.

    2. I was brought to the U.S. by my parents, and grew up here partly. Being an American is an organic part of my identity, as I grew up eating PB&J, watching "Family Ties," and pledging allegiance to the flag every morning in class, and going to Sunday school and church.

    3. You should make up your mind on whether conforming to American social norms is being "slavish" or assimilation. The problem with people like you is that you play "heads I win, tails you lose."

    It’s because you too are dog-like follower.
     
    "Dog-like" is a compliment, thanks. I keep a large pack of dogs. Dogs are loyal, dependable, courageous, and hardy. They ask for very little and in turn give a lot more. If more people were like dogs, it would be a better world. I've found dogs to be more trustworthy than most people.

    In this world, there are sheep, there are wolves, and there are (sheep) dogs. I chose to be a dog.

    As for being a follower, perhaps you didn't learn what I learned while carrying arms for my adapted country: "To be a leader, first learn to follow."

    You should make up your mind on whether conforming to American social norms is being “slavish” or assimilation. The problem with people like you is that you play “heads I win, tails you lose.

    Good point Twinkie. Easy to get confused here, and some people are not wired to be pleased.

    btw, “Slavish” used to be applied to Slavic people. Supposedly that’s where the word came from. Nowadays they are among the least slavish in their attitudes when the Powers That Be want to decide things for them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stephen R. Diamond

    btw, “Slavish” used to be applied to Slavic people. Supposedly that’s where the word came from. Nowadays they are among the least slavish in their attitudes when the Powers That Be want to decide things for them.
     
    Evidence against HBD?
  135. […] Fred Reed ponders if African Americans are pushing for resegregation. […]

    Read More
  136. @dcite

    You should make up your mind on whether conforming to American social norms is being “slavish” or assimilation. The problem with people like you is that you play “heads I win, tails you lose.
     
    Good point Twinkie. Easy to get confused here, and some people are not wired to be pleased.

    btw, "Slavish" used to be applied to Slavic people. Supposedly that's where the word came from. Nowadays they are among the least slavish in their attitudes when the Powers That Be want to decide things for them.

    btw, “Slavish” used to be applied to Slavic people. Supposedly that’s where the word came from. Nowadays they are among the least slavish in their attitudes when the Powers That Be want to decide things for them.

    Evidence against HBD?

    Read More
    • Replies: @dcite
    No, not at all. Everything is chemistry. Elements mixed in various combinations make different compounds that may be nothing like the base elements by themselves; but the base elements don't change. Some of the contexts people are in today, have no precedent. At least not on record.
  137. Talha says:
    @Twinkie

    Yellows are a slavish race
     
    You could have saved yourself a lot of keystrokes and left it at that. The rest of your long, incoherent, and rambling ranting adds nothing further to that statement.

    But then, ask yourself why you left your nation, became Christian, and mixed race and essentially threw away your own identity.
     
    1. I never said I was Korean.

    2. I was brought to the U.S. by my parents, and grew up here partly. Being an American is an organic part of my identity, as I grew up eating PB&J, watching "Family Ties," and pledging allegiance to the flag every morning in class, and going to Sunday school and church.

    3. You should make up your mind on whether conforming to American social norms is being "slavish" or assimilation. The problem with people like you is that you play "heads I win, tails you lose."

    It’s because you too are dog-like follower.
     
    "Dog-like" is a compliment, thanks. I keep a large pack of dogs. Dogs are loyal, dependable, courageous, and hardy. They ask for very little and in turn give a lot more. If more people were like dogs, it would be a better world. I've found dogs to be more trustworthy than most people.

    In this world, there are sheep, there are wolves, and there are (sheep) dogs. I chose to be a dog.

    As for being a follower, perhaps you didn't learn what I learned while carrying arms for my adapted country: "To be a leader, first learn to follow."

    Dear Twinkie,

    I honestly don’t know how people can link such wonderfully distinct people (Javanese, Malay, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, etc.) with their varied cultures and histories into one fat category. It truly boggles my mind.

    The sagacious Rumi (may God raise his rank) at times used the loyalty of dogs to teach spiritual lessons on approaching one’s Master:
    “Listen to the moan of a dog for its master.
    That whining is the connection.
    There are loving dogs
    no one knows the names of.
    Give your life
    to be one of them.”

    That was his wisdom on prayer, even if it is never answered in this world.

    May God preserve you and yours.

    Read More
  138. dcite says:
    @Stephen R. Diamond

    btw, “Slavish” used to be applied to Slavic people. Supposedly that’s where the word came from. Nowadays they are among the least slavish in their attitudes when the Powers That Be want to decide things for them.
     
    Evidence against HBD?

    No, not at all. Everything is chemistry. Elements mixed in various combinations make different compounds that may be nothing like the base elements by themselves; but the base elements don’t change. Some of the contexts people are in today, have no precedent. At least not on record.

    Read More
  139. It’s all about parasitism……really quite simple…Here to eat, and pro offer nothing; all under the guise of a “shared humanity”.
    There is one solution to the problem anthama to most….and no, it’s not Orkin…
    but rather more down to Earth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Does the solution require a woodchipper - chrome or not?
  140. Talha says:
    @Chrome Woodchipper
    It's all about parasitism......really quite simple...Here to eat, and pro offer nothing; all under the guise of a "shared humanity".
    There is one solution to the problem anthama to most....and no, it's not Orkin...
    but rather more down to Earth.

    Does the solution require a woodchipper – chrome or not?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chrome Woodchipper
    Expedient .....brilliant in its simplicity....
    Horrific in its design......fundamental in its intent......Yes...The chrome Woodchipper is elemental in GOD'S plan......AND man's salvation....
  141. Sbaker says:
    @Jefferson
    Does anybody here notice the disproportionate number of Homosexuals in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    The organization was started by 3 Dykes and Deray McKesson the BLM member who ran for mayor of Baltimore is a Gay man.

    Anybody here have a theory as to why LGBT who make up only 3 percent of The U.S population, are found in much higher percentages in the Black Lies Matter movement?

    because the lesbians and the male coprophiliacs are attempting to co-opt the civil rights movement for political gain. The few Africans I know resent the hell out of being equated to some sexual deviant with mental and physical diseases.

    Read More
  142. Rehmat says:
    @Khan Bodin
    Ahh, it's good to see that you are beginning to learn. You know the fact that Jews have been expelled from 109 countries since 250 AD. Good.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr9fyxUgkok

    Their fellow Semites, Phoenician Carthaginians were the ones to first expelled them in the mentioned year.

    Jews were expelled by European Christians 108 times – the longest period of time from England, 350 years. The European Christians are as much Semite as Pope is Ayatullah.

    The so-called “109th” – from Iraq is as much lie as the “Holy Land promised to Jews by the G-d of Scofield Bible”.

    http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/ref-giladi.html

    Read More
  143. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jefferson
    "Hispanics and Asians hate blacks."

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.

    Los Angeles is ground zero, when the economy collapses it will be like “Escape From New York”, the racial tension here is at the explosive stage, it will not take a match it will explode on it’s own- immigration has so utterly wrecked California there will never be a livable city again that isn’t in standoff mode. The f’n Asians are the worst, they brought their dog eat dog greedy selfish vain garbage cultures with them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Brohemius
    Right. I'd rather live in a black neighborhood than an Asian neighborhood. Black folks are much more cultured.
    , @Tony
    " they brought their dog eat dog"
    Dont talk about eating dog when youre talking about asians. That be lacist.
  144. @Talha
    Does the solution require a woodchipper - chrome or not?

    Expedient …..brilliant in its simplicity….
    Horrific in its design……fundamental in its intent……Yes…The chrome Woodchipper is elemental in GOD’S plan……AND man’s salvation….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Someone's been watching Fargo again - gosh durnit! :)
  145. Talha says:
    @Chrome Woodchipper
    Expedient .....brilliant in its simplicity....
    Horrific in its design......fundamental in its intent......Yes...The chrome Woodchipper is elemental in GOD'S plan......AND man's salvation....

    Someone’s been watching Fargo again – gosh durnit! :)

    Read More
  146. No….I’m not a television viewer…
    Have not been for 10 years.
    I am the product of self relevation. All
    others are to find their way thru SELF guidance ….. life is curious in this regard.
    In fact……demands it

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Good for you - TV outlasted its usefulness to civilization decades ago.

    Peace.
  147. Talha says:
    @Chrome Woodchipper
    No....I'm not a television viewer...
    Have not been for 10 years.
    I am the product of self relevation. All
    others are to find their way thru SELF guidance ..... life is curious in this regard.
    In fact......demands it

    Good for you – TV outlasted its usefulness to civilization decades ago.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mtn cur
    Dr. Gerald Smith of the University of the South wrote that "the people to whom the government gave control of TV were criminally insane."
  148. mtn cur says:
    @Talha
    Good for you - TV outlasted its usefulness to civilization decades ago.

    Peace.

    Dr. Gerald Smith of the University of the South wrote that “the people to whom the government gave control of TV were criminally insane.”

    Read More
  149. Brohemius says:
    @Jefferson
    "Hispanics and Asians hate blacks."

    Asians and Hispanics hate Whites a lot more than Blacks. Asians and Hispanics are cheering for the demise of White America.

    Asians and Hispanics are part of The Coalition Of The Fringes. They are not the new Italians and Irish. They are not culturally assimilating into White America. They are culturally assimilating into Black oppressed victimhood status. Most Asians and Hispanics claim to be racially oppressed by White supremacy. Asians and Hispanics make up a high percentage of Social Justice Warriors.

    Wishful thinking. Cling to your fantasy as long as you can. Reality hurts!

    Read More
  150. Brohemius says:
    @Anonymous
    Los Angeles is ground zero, when the economy collapses it will be like "Escape From New York", the racial tension here is at the explosive stage, it will not take a match it will explode on it's own- immigration has so utterly wrecked California there will never be a livable city again that isn't in standoff mode. The f'n Asians are the worst, they brought their dog eat dog greedy selfish vain garbage cultures with them.

    Right. I’d rather live in a black neighborhood than an Asian neighborhood. Black folks are much more cultured.

    Read More
  151. Tony says:
    @Anonymous
    Los Angeles is ground zero, when the economy collapses it will be like "Escape From New York", the racial tension here is at the explosive stage, it will not take a match it will explode on it's own- immigration has so utterly wrecked California there will never be a livable city again that isn't in standoff mode. The f'n Asians are the worst, they brought their dog eat dog greedy selfish vain garbage cultures with them.

    ” they brought their dog eat dog”
    Dont talk about eating dog when youre talking about asians. That be lacist.

    Read More
  152. Moses says:
    @KenH
    What does BLM want? To create a false narrative of white police perfidy and violence and black victimhood. This is just another branch of black victimology that they plan to parlay into yet another race hustle and perpetual cash windfall. After all, race hustling and fomenting hatred of whitey sure beats getting an education/edumacation and busting your buns at a regular job.

    BLM still won't acknowledge that 93% of blacks are killed not by whites or white cops, but by their fellow blacks. The left in general and blacks in particular, simply ignore or deny facts when it doesn't further their cause.

    Most "racist" white cops enter the force with few or no racial convictions and have race consciousness rudely forced on them after contact with blacks, Latinos and other wondrous, but violent third world minorities.

    Yep. I came to the same conclusion. BLM is just another race hustle about money. Just like Sharpton and Jackson.

    Just follow the money trail. BLM agitators get money and/or jobs. Will be interesting to see when there’s no more whitey to spread around.

    Read More
  153. @pyrrhus
    Things won't be equal for long...

    what about “for as long as the human kind exists”? :)

    Read More
  154. @WorkingClass
    I'm a working class white guy living in a majority black city in the deep south. I know a lot of black people who work for a living and are not criminals. They don't like the gang bangers any more than I do. They are the victims of black on black crime. I live in a mixed neighborhood which is less dangerous than the all black neighborhoods. Still, the swat teams here manage to break into the wrong address and shoot the wrong people. The police are the only thing keeping the gangs of thugs down. But both black and white people have ample reason to fear both the police and the thugs.

    Black Lives Matter is funded, I am told, by Mr. Soros. What I would tell BLM is they are being used to exacerbate racial strife in America. Keeping black and white at each others throats is public policy. What I would tell comfortable middle class white people, who are not hassled by the cops because they can afford a lawyer, is that police brutality and criminality are real. That the war on drugs with its vast gulag of jails and prisons is real.

    We all have a common enemy. The Police State and the scumbags who own it. We will have neither liberty nor peace and prosperity until we unite against our oppressors. Not BLM. Not Mexicans. Not queers or feminists or cry babies on campus. Not white racists or red necks. But those who oppress us all. The .01%.

    Yes, the 0,1%.

    I wonder why many refer to the tyranny apparatus as “the 1%”. It’s cleary the 0.1%, or maybe even the 0.01%.

    Read More
  155. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    If blacks had any sense, they would have fought tooth and nail against immigration. They didn't. They will reap what they have sown for that decision.

    Look at Hillary's campaign. There's no new programs to help the poor. Just SJW talk. I suspect that we're at or near Peak Black. As the country grows poorer and more Brazil-like, there will be less and less to dole out. Hispanics and Asians hate blacks. Whites will become a smaller portion of the population. What's more, whites aren't having the best of times.

    No, the pie will get smaller and more groups will be taking their piece. Black will get less. Of course, they're too stupid to realize this.

    “Of course, they’re too stupid to realize this.”

    I don’t think they are stupid.
    I think who misleads them is, unfortunately, terribly clever.

    Read More
  156. Hrw-500 says:

    A bit off-topic I spotted this article at http://www.news24.com/Video/SouthAfrica/News/julius-will-stop-the-corruption-eff-supporter-20160801 via a post on Mike Smith’s blog. I quoted an exterpt of that article: “If there were no whites, we would eat each other – EFF supporter”.

    Youtube vlogger Styxhexenhammer666 got a different philosophy by saying “No Lives Matter” in a recent vlog. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzdkJaLWt5c

    Read More
  157. Jim says:

    This is a good article. I didn’t agree with the BLM issue but hey.

    Read More
  158. Gemjunior says:
    @Svigor
    Maybe blacks want things a lot like they are now. They have a set of perpetual grievances to mobilize their demographic at will. Whenever the leadership is low on funds, they can go and shake this money tree. They also have mostly decent policing, and a government and establishment that are hyper-sensitive to them, their needs, and their complaints (regardless of merit). They have a majority snookered by the delusions of racial equality and white guilt.

    What's not to like? Trouble is, they believe their own BS, and actually seem to think a majority non-white America will be more amenable to their concerns and demands. Which is pretty hilarious, when you think about it. Favelas and shantytowns are in their not-too-distant future, but thinking ahead has never been their forte.

    If they had any sense, they'd be protecting the white demographic as their most precious natural resource, because it is.

    You are absolutely on point here. There are many solutions to the problem such as black cops only in black neighborhoods, separate but equal towns, etc. but they do not want a solution. They are immature to the extent that most black people remain in their teens psychologically, due to the makeup of their genetics, their growth patterns and IQ development. Black babies mature at a rate faster than white babies do – they have a larger head circumference at birth than white babies do, they sit up before white babies, roll over before white, walk first, etc. and this is borne out in developmental tests over many years. This growth continues until the age of about 14 and then slows to a halt. This is the reason for the behavior.

    This refers to the averages, not outliers. There are many blacks who are not only mature and wise, but extremely intelligent as well.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Fred Reed Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Not What Tom Jefferson Had in Mind
Sounds Like A Low-Ranked American University To Me
Very Long, Will Bore Hell Out Of Most People, But I Felt Like Doing It
It's Not A Job. It's An Adventure.
Cloudy, With Possible Tidal Wave