The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Fred Reed ArchiveBlogview
“Payback’s a Bitch”
Rural Wisdom and the Gathering Storm
shutterstock_258851933
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

The furor over the Confederate flag, think I, has little to do with the Confederate flag, which is a pretext, an uninvolved bystander. Rather it is about a seething anger in the United States that we must not mention. It is the anger of people who see everything they are and believe under attack by people they aren’t and do not want to be—their heritage, their religion, their values and way of life all mocked and even made criminal.

The talking heads inside Washington’s beltway, in editorial suites in New York, do not know of this anger. They do not talk to people in Joe’s Bar in Chicago or in barbecue joints in Wheeling. They are cloistered, smug, sure of themselves. And they are asking for it.

We are dealing with things visceral, not rational. Confusing the two is dangerous. Hatreds can boil over as syllogisms cannot. The banning of the flag infuriates, for example, me. Why? Although a Southerner by raising, I would far prefer to live in New York City than in Memphis. Yet I value my boyhood in Virginia and Alabama. My ancestors go back to the house of Burgesses, and I remember long slow summer days on the Rappahannock and in the limestone of Athens, Alabama.

When the federal government and the talking heads want to ban my past—here, permit me to exit momentarily the fraudulent objectivity of literature—I hate the sonsofbitches.

A lot of people quietly hate the sonsofbitches.

To them, to us, the Confederate flag stands for resistance to control from afar, to meddling and instruction from people we detest. It is the flag of “Leave me the hell alone.” And this Washington, Boston, and New York will…not…do.

A surprise may be coming.

What is the anger about? Most visibly, but far from uniquely, race: the illegals, the Knock-Out game, and Washington’s protection of both. The racial hostility that pervades the country today is largely the doing of the talking heads and its perverse social policies. The rancor is unlike anything I have seen.

Curious. When I was a lad ages ago, I thought well of Brown vs. the School board. Southerners said that integration would never work and they were right, but what came before was just wrong. I thought so then, and I think so now. I favored the civil-rights acts. I reluctantly favored affirmative action (I was very young) thinking it meant a hand up instead of an entitlement. I wrote hopefully of the prospect of educating blacks.

But look what happened. We now see forced hiring of the incompetent as a right, endless accounts of blacks destroying shopping malls, burning cities, brutally attacking whites in gangs, and the giving to blacks of anything they want because they are black. You don’t like the Confederate flag, Jesse? Why then, it must go. Whatever you say, Jesse.

It wasn’t this way, but it is now. It is getting worse. But there is far more than race. We now are compelled to live in a national sexual-freak show. Day after day after day the media are full of trans-this and trans-that, of homosexual marriages, all thrust in our faces, a parade of prancing peculiarities demanding and demanding and demanding. People who dare not say so are sick of it.

It isn’t viciousness. I don’t know anyone who wants to persecute the erotically baroque. Poofters in particular are usually bright, productive, decent people, and do not attack whites in wheel chairs with hammers. Yet I weary of their endless tedious concerns. I say, go. Go with God, but for God’s sake go. Or just shut up. That would do as well.

I, we, will be told, “But Fred, homosexuality is natural.” So is hemorrhagic tuberculosis. So is sadism. So is genocide.

Any sexual predilection can be called natural, and arguments can be made for all of them: Polygamy, or marriage with a sheep, or copulating on a public bus, or sex with girls of nine years. (How about, “Sex is natural. Children are erotic: Don’t they play doctor? Little girls are only afraid of it because of puritanical conditioning by society. Oral sex feels good, and adults do it, so why not…? Why shouldn’t her father gently teach her….” And so on.)

And crime is out of control, protected by a President and Attorney General with whom we, so many Americans, have nothing in common, who dislike us, and who want to disarm us and flood our country with illegal and incompatible aliens.

Do you think that wanting a gun is silly? Last week I started getting emails: “Chuck got shot.” On Breitbart I found that Chuck De Caro, a journalist and friend for so long that I forget how I met him, had checked into a motel in Albuquerque with his wife, whereupon an armed dirtbag tried to rob them and perhaps worse. I suppose that a white couple in their sixties must have seemed a soft target. Oops. It wasn’t a swell career move. Chuck is ex-Special Forces and a longtime war correspondent. Threatening his wife doesn’t fly well with him.

Anyway, Chuck apparently had other ideas about being robbed and perhaps killed. He also had a handgun. In the ensuing gunfight, he was hit several times and rushed to the hospital. Chuck will be okay, the dirtbag less so. He escaped to the parking lot, where he decided to lie down and bleed to death. A good choice. The news stories didn’t describe the perp, which meant….

Decaro

This gem, Tomorio Walton, is, or was, a career criminal and was, of course, on parole. Can you guess why so many of us want guns and carry permits? Characteristically I had to find the photo in the Mail Online, an English paper.

Then there is the de-Christianizing of the country. Religion, both historically and currently, is a potent thing. Play with it at your risk. It is not always really a matter of religion. Many of us, I among them, are not believers but value Christmas and its traditions. But no. We must not have nativity scenes or sing Christmas carols on public streets. Easter-egg hunts are unconstitutional. Mommy Washington doesn’t like them, and we have to do what Washington says.

Unless, of course, one day we don’t.

We are winding a spring.

bloody-beatdown

Standard beatdown of white man by black mob at Fourth of July in Cincinnati. Almost a daily occurrence. The media will hide it. This is not a part of my culture. Why do we put up with it?

Stoking the flames under the pressure cooker is the unending, ever-tightening control of every aspect of life by Washington. People inside the city’s beltway, a venue I know well, do not understand what they are playing with. They are sure that they know best, and they are going to make us toe the line.

ORDER IT NOW

Federal bureaucrats tell people in Casper, Laredo, and Knoxville what they can and cannot teach their children in the schools, what religious practices they may have and what their children may eat. They set curricula, determine to whom bakeries must sell cakes, decide who can marry what, and with whom we must associate.

I could go on. There is quiet fury about open borders, the forced acceptance of criminal aliens, of 100,000 Somalis by Minnesota, the endless wars, the declining standard of living, the insane censorship (say “nigger” and your career of thirty years ends) and the ungodly surveillance. Washington pushes, pushes, and pushes, thinking that with just enough pressure, we will all come to kowtow.

What if one day we don’t?

And there is governmental corruption, the sense—“realization,” I would say—that Washington is entirely in the hands of the arms manufacturers, of the Israeli lobby, of big pharma and ethnic lobbies and, well, anyone who bribes Congress. Elections are a sham, serving only to decide the division of the spoils for eight years. All decisions of importance are carefully kept out of the public’s hands.

Maybe Washington will always get away with it. Maybe it won’t. White Americans are an obedient and passive people, easily cowed, but maybe enough will prove enough. Maybe things will blow. Maybe jurisdictions will just ignore the feds, as begins to happen.

But it is dangerous. The economy declines, people out of college can’t get jobs, the ghettos simmer, automation surges across the board, and one day soon we will have cutbacks in the entitlements. When groups begin competing for dwindling resources, things will get ugly. It could explode. It really could. You might be surprised how many people out there think, “Bring it on.” Not a good idea, but we go that way.

Tick Tick. Tick.

(Reprinted from Fred on Everything by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Confederate Flag, Race/Crime 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. “You might be surprised how many people out there think, “Bring it on.” – No, I wouldn’t.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/freed/paybacks-a-bitch/#comment-1001431
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. I wonder about the same sort of things, Fred. I live in a city and keep a .357 in my nightstand. But my rural and ex-urban friends have a handgun for just about every room in their house. And rifles. And a couple of shotguns.

    Some of them go along, and they say all the right things, do all the right things with these troubled, rigid smiles on their faces. But most of them are just keeping quiet and courteous (they’re Southerners, after all). At some point, the Saxon will begin to hate.

    Read More
  3. Not sure about the rest of what you wrote, but I’ll certainly agree about one thing: Jews and Northeastern whites (the modern Puritans) will never leave Southern whites (and any other white that doesn’t agree with them) alone. They hate you as much as you hate them. What’s more, they fear you. They literally want to destroy you.

    And you know what? They’re winning. They’re better organized and more motivated. (After all, fear is the best motivator.) They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis. If possible, they’d love to see you genetically disappear.

    For the moment, their plan is working pretty well. In another generation or two, the game could be over for the most part.

    I’m on your side, but the trend is against you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Borachio
    Hello? I'm a Jewish American, and I agree with Fred.

    I didn't grow up in the South, but I respect its culture and its people.

    More to the point, I believe in leaving people the hell alone unless they interfere with my life or my community.

    I approve of the Confederate Battle Flag, but whether or not anyone else chooses to fly it is not my business. I disapprove of Muslims beheading people, but unless it's in America or my state, it's not my business.

    Every national, ethnic, or religious group has some people who think it's their right to run other people's lives. Most of us just want to live and let live.

    , @MarkinLA
    And you know what? They’re winning.

    Only because they have had control of the media and government. The government is in the process of overreaching every day. The media is starting to lose control.
    , @Anonymous
    I'm sure you know "northeastern whites" doesn't apply to Northern Maine. We love all of our patriotic brothers.
    , @Anonymous
    Please keep my religion out of your mouth I in now way want anything to change in this country other than all the bs that's going on now. I support your right as a Christian but I hope you are also not a bigot and support my right.
    , @Anonymous
    You say the issue is organization citizen, but the civil war proved that on prompting the south organized significantly quicker than the North. The true issue was availability of arms and production of ammo. The North was out maneuvered in nearly every battle, took many more losses than the south, Lee outwitted every Union general posed. The victory of the North was thanks to numbers and production of ammunition and goods. Don't get organization and supply confused.
  4. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Not sure about the rest of what you wrote, but I'll certainly agree about one thing: Jews and Northeastern whites (the modern Puritans) will never leave Southern whites (and any other white that doesn't agree with them) alone. They hate you as much as you hate them. What's more, they fear you. They literally want to destroy you.

    And you know what? They're winning. They're better organized and more motivated. (After all, fear is the best motivator.) They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis. If possible, they'd love to see you genetically disappear.

    For the moment, their plan is working pretty well. In another generation or two, the game could be over for the most part.

    I'm on your side, but the trend is against you.

    Hello? I’m a Jewish American, and I agree with Fred.

    I didn’t grow up in the South, but I respect its culture and its people.

    More to the point, I believe in leaving people the hell alone unless they interfere with my life or my community.

    I approve of the Confederate Battle Flag, but whether or not anyone else chooses to fly it is not my business. I disapprove of Muslims beheading people, but unless it’s in America or my state, it’s not my business.

    Every national, ethnic, or religious group has some people who think it’s their right to run other people’s lives. Most of us just want to live and let live.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ragno
    Great. That makes one.

    Why, on sites like this one, do we only hear from Jews who "agree with us" but only to defuse looming/potential criticism of your own? Were you about to post a much longer screed exhibiting rancor and disgust at the 90+% of your co-religionists who are currently paving over Western Civilization with the magical curative of tikkun olam? Or are we about to go 'round the mulberry bush again, playing it's a race/ no, it's a religion/ no, you're both anti-Semites!, because frankly that is one seriously tiresome parlor game, and I no longer wish to play.

    Hey - relax. Just funnin' you. I've been reading Fred for a decade plus now and I assure you - nothing on this Earth, up to and including massacre sites with Stars of David burned permanently into the earth left behind as a calling card, could ever get Fred to point a finger at the Tribe. From a Jewish perspective, he's the ideal white conservative: it's the blacks or it's the Muslims and/or it's the white politicians; end of story. As far as he's concerned, cui bono is one of Cher's in-laws.

    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    I'm glad to hear of your opinion. And, to be honest, I suspect (though I can't be sure, of course) that your opinion is shared by a large portion of American Jews, perhaps even a majority. I've had a lot of Jewish friends, and, for the most part, their views would fit in quite nicely with Fred and Steve Sailer.

    So, yes, technically, I should have written "Jewish elites." They are the ones leading the charge against my people, providing almost all of the funding, organization and intellectual firepower. (Granted, there are plenty of goys screwing their own over for Pokemon social status points, but the head leads the body so to speak.) However, that being said, the general Jewish population (my buddies) aren't lifting a finger to stop it.

    Since everything comes back to the Holocaust, it's a bit like a sympathetic German citizen lamenting the SS taking away their neighbor that they like to his death in a camp. Sure, they're against it, but I'm still dead.

    Whether you like it or not, your people is at war with my people. (Actually, it's not a war because one side isn't fighting.) I'm glad that you're on our side, but until the rank and file of American Jews start to push back against their leaders, you're just one of those Germans who said, "But we didn't know what was happening." Except, of course, in your case, you do know.

    I can only hope and pray that American Jews start to push back against their own leaders, if for no other reason than it's in their own interest. Their leaders' insane fear of some American pogrom is destroying the country that they live in. Remember, most American Jews are in the same boat as the rest of us. The brown horde creeps ever closer to their neighborhoods as well. (My Jewish friends absolutely hate blacks and South Asians. The Hispanics are too far away.)
  5. Fred’s on to it, too:

    “Washington is entirely in the hands of the arms manufacturers, of the Israeli lobby, of big pharma and ethnic lobbies and, well, anyone who bribes Congress. Elections are a sham, serving only to decide the division of the spoils for eight years. All decisions of importance are carefully kept out of the public’s hands.”

    Managed democracy, inverted totalitarianism, Superpower. Political philosopher Sheldon Wolin describes it right and it’s just what Washington has become. There’s no accountability to the people.

    Corporations and government conspire to keep the public in thrall. Their propaganda and the suppression of critical thinking serve to promote an ideology which sees democracy as dispensable, an obstacle to what they consider to be progress. America is governed by two corporate controlled parties in which any populist candidate gets stomped on.

    http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=12550

    Read More
  6. I don’t know, nothing seems to push the civilized American to action, except long gas lines, and the youth are all being trained in schools. I do suspect ye ol battle flag will continue in popularity but probably more so in places in the north than in the south which is being chastised and indoctrinated.

    Read More
  7. @Borachio
    Hello? I'm a Jewish American, and I agree with Fred.

    I didn't grow up in the South, but I respect its culture and its people.

    More to the point, I believe in leaving people the hell alone unless they interfere with my life or my community.

    I approve of the Confederate Battle Flag, but whether or not anyone else chooses to fly it is not my business. I disapprove of Muslims beheading people, but unless it's in America or my state, it's not my business.

    Every national, ethnic, or religious group has some people who think it's their right to run other people's lives. Most of us just want to live and let live.

    Great. That makes one.

    Why, on sites like this one, do we only hear from Jews who “agree with us” but only to defuse looming/potential criticism of your own? Were you about to post a much longer screed exhibiting rancor and disgust at the 90+% of your co-religionists who are currently paving over Western Civilization with the magical curative of tikkun olam? Or are we about to go ’round the mulberry bush again, playing it’s a race/ no, it’s a religion/ no, you’re both anti-Semites!, because frankly that is one seriously tiresome parlor game, and I no longer wish to play.

    Hey – relax. Just funnin’ you. I’ve been reading Fred for a decade plus now and I assure you – nothing on this Earth, up to and including massacre sites with Stars of David burned permanently into the earth left behind as a calling card, could ever get Fred to point a finger at the Tribe. From a Jewish perspective, he’s the ideal white conservative: it’s the blacks or it’s the Muslims and/or it’s the white politicians; end of story. As far as he’s concerned, cui bono is one of Cher’s in-laws.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Bullshit. You've paved yourself over. Did you give up meat? At least factory meat? Have a lot of children and grandchildren? Give up schools? Give up pharma and other vaccines? Give up artificial foods? Get out of the tax system, credit system, vehicle system, insurance system? When's the last time you pioneered some new ground?

    Nothing but a bunch of whinging baby boomers. A little peasant rebellion by arthritic gut heavy morons.
    , @Kyle McKenna
    Ragno, that is one comprehensively brilliant post.
    Expect to be excoriated by the usual suspects.
    And remember that's a badge of honour...
    , @Hugo
    Bingo. I'm glad there's one Jew that doesn't want to meddle, corrupt and agitate. The other 99% need to be dealt with. Oh I know, were supposed to not notice these things but, I'm in my 20s and have no holocaust guilt. Just another event in human history full of shittee events. And I agree that as a people we're waking up. I see it every day. But, the tipping point isn't here yet as many of us are still too comfortable. When we're no longer comfortable, things will jump off. Hopefully, starting with the head of MTV whom I'm sure is a Buddhist.
  8. @Borachio
    Hello? I'm a Jewish American, and I agree with Fred.

    I didn't grow up in the South, but I respect its culture and its people.

    More to the point, I believe in leaving people the hell alone unless they interfere with my life or my community.

    I approve of the Confederate Battle Flag, but whether or not anyone else chooses to fly it is not my business. I disapprove of Muslims beheading people, but unless it's in America or my state, it's not my business.

    Every national, ethnic, or religious group has some people who think it's their right to run other people's lives. Most of us just want to live and let live.

    I’m glad to hear of your opinion. And, to be honest, I suspect (though I can’t be sure, of course) that your opinion is shared by a large portion of American Jews, perhaps even a majority. I’ve had a lot of Jewish friends, and, for the most part, their views would fit in quite nicely with Fred and Steve Sailer.

    So, yes, technically, I should have written “Jewish elites.” They are the ones leading the charge against my people, providing almost all of the funding, organization and intellectual firepower. (Granted, there are plenty of goys screwing their own over for Pokemon social status points, but the head leads the body so to speak.) However, that being said, the general Jewish population (my buddies) aren’t lifting a finger to stop it.

    Since everything comes back to the Holocaust, it’s a bit like a sympathetic German citizen lamenting the SS taking away their neighbor that they like to his death in a camp. Sure, they’re against it, but I’m still dead.

    Whether you like it or not, your people is at war with my people. (Actually, it’s not a war because one side isn’t fighting.) I’m glad that you’re on our side, but until the rank and file of American Jews start to push back against their leaders, you’re just one of those Germans who said, “But we didn’t know what was happening.” Except, of course, in your case, you do know.

    I can only hope and pray that American Jews start to push back against their own leaders, if for no other reason than it’s in their own interest. Their leaders’ insane fear of some American pogrom is destroying the country that they live in. Remember, most American Jews are in the same boat as the rest of us. The brown horde creeps ever closer to their neighborhoods as well. (My Jewish friends absolutely hate blacks and South Asians. The Hispanics are too far away.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Retired
    Jews, like Asians, only care about a few things, money and family. Whites care about the wider community they live in. I know very few Jews who do more than pay lip service to any social or political issues. The ones that do are uniformly liberal. Asians don't pretend to care.

    We are probably doomed as a nation since we have abandoned our spiritual and cultural heritage to neo-marxists and their fellow travelers who are systematically ruining every institution and value that undergird America. Look at England, in a decade or so we will be them. This war we are losing is a spiritual one, not material. The 2nd Amendment will not save us after we lose the 1st 4th and 5th.
  9. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Not sure about the rest of what you wrote, but I'll certainly agree about one thing: Jews and Northeastern whites (the modern Puritans) will never leave Southern whites (and any other white that doesn't agree with them) alone. They hate you as much as you hate them. What's more, they fear you. They literally want to destroy you.

    And you know what? They're winning. They're better organized and more motivated. (After all, fear is the best motivator.) They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis. If possible, they'd love to see you genetically disappear.

    For the moment, their plan is working pretty well. In another generation or two, the game could be over for the most part.

    I'm on your side, but the trend is against you.

    And you know what? They’re winning.

    Only because they have had control of the media and government. The government is in the process of overreaching every day. The media is starting to lose control.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    True, to a degree. It's not the same as ten or twenty years ago. The Internet has allowed more voices to come through. In addition, the changing demographics have forced more and more people to face reality. However, that being said, the powers than be remain pretty firmly in control, if not quite as much as before.

    Will things change? Well, they always do, I suppose. The question remains how quickly and will my people still exist in any reasonable form when it does. I'm not to hopeful. I grew up in a rural area but now live in the DC suburbs. I know both worlds. My childhood home seems generally oblivious to what's going on. Sure, they recognize that Hispanics are becoming a greater part of the population, but they're is still no feeling racial solidarity and a desire to protect their heritage.

    I understand the conundrum. They don't hate Hispanics. (They do hate blacks.) They don't want to beat up some guy because he's Mexican. However, he is different, and they wish that he wasn't there. His presence - and the presence of more and more of his kind - is slowly destroying their world. It's not enough to incite violence, but the lack of violence leads to their destruction. In a sense, they need to be racialized. And the very difficult part of that is violence against a person who in a sense doesn't deserve it.

    A nice Hispanic family moves into the neighborhood. They're decent enough people. But there presence may push more Hispanic families - ones not quite so decent - to move into your neighborhood. Over time, the neighborhood turns into a Barrio because of that first, nice family. It's better to kill the baby in the crib. You have to be violent against good people to preserve your neighborhood. It's a history lesson that whites - because of their success for the past 500 years - have forgotten. Other races understand that in their bones. We don't. It's a genetic fault of ours. Either we adapt, or we will disappear.
    , @Anonymous
    "THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN" is a phrase I never beleived I would witness in my lifetime become reality. My greatgrandparents were racist and told me I would see days like this. Hate and racism was buried with them. The people wanting to blast Stn.Mt. the largest monument in the world and prehibit our rebel flag should have let sleeping dogs asleep.
  10. @MarkinLA
    And you know what? They’re winning.

    Only because they have had control of the media and government. The government is in the process of overreaching every day. The media is starting to lose control.

    True, to a degree. It’s not the same as ten or twenty years ago. The Internet has allowed more voices to come through. In addition, the changing demographics have forced more and more people to face reality. However, that being said, the powers than be remain pretty firmly in control, if not quite as much as before.

    Will things change? Well, they always do, I suppose. The question remains how quickly and will my people still exist in any reasonable form when it does. I’m not to hopeful. I grew up in a rural area but now live in the DC suburbs. I know both worlds. My childhood home seems generally oblivious to what’s going on. Sure, they recognize that Hispanics are becoming a greater part of the population, but they’re is still no feeling racial solidarity and a desire to protect their heritage.

    I understand the conundrum. They don’t hate Hispanics. (They do hate blacks.) They don’t want to beat up some guy because he’s Mexican. However, he is different, and they wish that he wasn’t there. His presence – and the presence of more and more of his kind – is slowly destroying their world. It’s not enough to incite violence, but the lack of violence leads to their destruction. In a sense, they need to be racialized. And the very difficult part of that is violence against a person who in a sense doesn’t deserve it.

    A nice Hispanic family moves into the neighborhood. They’re decent enough people. But there presence may push more Hispanic families – ones not quite so decent – to move into your neighborhood. Over time, the neighborhood turns into a Barrio because of that first, nice family. It’s better to kill the baby in the crib. You have to be violent against good people to preserve your neighborhood. It’s a history lesson that whites – because of their success for the past 500 years – have forgotten. Other races understand that in their bones. We don’t. It’s a genetic fault of ours. Either we adapt, or we will disappear.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kyle McKenna
    Get out of the Washington metro area. It's toast.

    And people don't believe what's going on around them because they find audio-visual 'entertainment' (propaganda) more compelling. Criticise the jews all you want (not saying you did), but they early on recognised the power of that medium and got there first (well, almost first) with the most, and now essentially run the show.

  11. Undoubtedly the bi-coastal elites and their freak show followers hiding behind activist judges and a thug force of goosestepping Federal cops will push a bit too far and the people will start pushing back. I’m sure folks will protest peacefully at first, but dollars to donuts, the authorities will escalate to make a example out of those who resist them. They just can’t help themselves since they are inveterate bullies and tyrants. That’s when all hell will brake lose.

    Look they have SCOTUS, POTUS and Congress on their side, they are on a roll and they will push hard against us, basically stomping our faces into the dirt. Right now the Christian churches and Southern white Christian males are in their crosshairs thanks to the SCOTUS and the Root’s murder spree. As Californian, it’s quite apparent even to me, that the Feds are on a jihad against Johnny Reb and Southern Culture in general. They want to eradicate part of our history, heritage and culture. Fuck that shit.

    These freaks, ponces and worms have all but openly declared war against whites.

    Christian churches will fare no better. It is inevitable that the Gay taliban will force the issue by demanding say Catholic or Baptist churches sanctify gay marriage. And when they don’t, there will be lawsuits, followed by threats by Gays then arrests of priests who refuse to follow state edicts. Expect churches to be shut down.

    Most won’t raise a fuss, but some will. Some priests will be beaten or killed by the Feds or Gays to coerce the others into obedience, some will die mysteriously in while in police custody. People will start extracting revenge by then.

    Or it could be something else that starts it. it’s hard to tell with this claque of power hungry lunatics. Like Forrest Gump said, “stupid is as stupid does”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jim sweeney
    The obvious, to me anyway, answer for is for Christian priest, ministers, reverends and other religious like Rabbis, to simply resign their civil authority to legally marry people. Let ALL marriages per se be performed at the local courts or some civil bureau. Then, religious MARRIED couples can go to their particular church/minister and have him/her perform a religious, celebratory service of their marriage. This is similar to the civil/religious practice in much of the world. Churches will then EXERCISE their religious rules of one man & one woman to which none may object. Parishoners only please and, if you're a gay couple, we don't exercise that way. I don't see any possible legal objection to that approach.

    It gets the churches out of marriage itself which, as we know, is just a contract. It keeps them in weddings however, especially religious weddings. It perfectly separates church from state and who can argue with that?

    I've argued this on my own site and, so far, nobody has even taken a shot at it.

    Try so it can be improved - thanks.
  12. You foolish mortal.

    The confederate flag thing is another inflame and divert technique used to distract “high-IQ geniuses” such as yourself, as well at the “low IQ cretins” whom you constantly belittle, but in reality, more resemble, from thinking about more pertinent things: Such as logical solutions.

    The government did not stop the MK Ultra program because it didn’t work, merely because there was less overhead simply disseminating the wanted information through a network of unpaid underlings, rabid with arrogance and self-pity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dahlia
    They spent, what?, may be 5 seconds mourning those 9 souls?

    And that profound Christian witness about forgiveness given by the families... Except for the Amish schoolhouse slaughter, I've never heard of it so powerfully demonstrated. And this time we got to see it with our own eyes.

    I really believed at the time that there would be all this focus on victims, the Christian woman who fearfully, but prayerfully, followed Dylann Roof which lead to his capture, their families, and how well Charleston came together.
    I never expected anything less from Charleston. Graceful as always and now the nation would see how wonderful all these people were in adversity. I used to live there and even fearfully looked up if any of my old friends and co-workers were among the dead.

    Naive. Almost completely ignored. The last article I read that even was about them before changing the subject to the southern white menace was from a Jewish perspective that forgiveness like this was wrong (Christianity is unique and confounding in this, but show some respect, please.) One shining spot was a long article about African-American Christianity and its beginnings.

    It just seems more an excuse to flay southern whites. 95% of the energy has gone to them versus the murdered victims by my reckoning.
    , @Southern Sage
    To Anonymous: Excuse me? Are you gaga or what? What does the South have to do with China, Afghanistan or Iraq? Are you nuts? The South-Hating Washington Establishment has got us into these conflicts. The South and Southerners have not more to do with it than any other part of the country. What a moron you are to even write such drivel.
  13. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Yes, white southerners should be left alone. But where are these same white southerners when it comes to leaving Iraqis alone. Or Afgahnis, or Russians, or Chinese, or etc etc.

    If these white southerners want to be left alone so much, why don’t they first work on leaving the rest of the world alone too?

    Read More
    • Replies: @DH
    +1
    , @Realist
    Great point.
    , @hammersmith
    Anon has spoken a splendid truth. A subjugated South becomes a cornerstone of support for the American Empire abroad. I agree with the article writer's sentiment wholly, but our lack of intellectual purity/consistency worries me.
    , @Flower
    Weeeellll, an interesting assertation, so let's check it out.

    Starting at the top:
    President Barak Obama from? Illinois.
    Vice President (and Prez of the Senate) Joe Biden from? Delaware
    Speaker of the House John Boehner from? Ohio
    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid from? Nevada
    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey from? New Jersey
    CEO Lockheed-Martin Marilyn Hewson from? Kansas
    Hillary Clinton, Dem front runner for Prez and General Pain In The Ass from? She claims NY citizenship, but we all know she is from the Planet Xylon III.
    Jewish Rabble Rouser Bibi Netenyahu from? Well it ain't Dixie.

    Yeah, you gots lots and lots of Dixie Good Ol' Boys in that list, huh?
    , @Hibernian
    Southerners are disproportionately represented in the Army and the Marine Corps. I'm not sure about the other services. Southern White Christian clergy tend to celebrate the military. On the other hand, the best voices against warmongering among Congressional Republicans since about 2005 have been Paul of Texas, Duncan of Tennessee, Paul of Kentucky, Jones of North Carolina, and Hostettler of southern Indiana.
    , @Kyle McKenna
    You simply have to consider their sources of information.

    If your enemy creates your truth, you are a slave.

  14. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    My cousin’s family stopped by the Gettysburg battlefield last week and said they couldn’t buy a Confederate flag in the national park gift shop. The clerk said the National Park Service removed all Confederate flags from the gift shops of the national park system nationwide. Soon the park service will claim the battle was between the Union and the Romulans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    " Soon the park service will claim the battle was between the Union and the Romulans."

    Or the Borg....better yet the Cardassians who won the battle and have taken over our televisions with trailer trash 'entertainment'.
  15. I’ll say this much – the passing of AFHHA into inescapable reality is ten, twenty, a hundred times more momentous and potentially disastrous than all the Confederate flag controversies in Christendom (which is probably why the media chose not to even mention it until it was already law o’ the land).

    We’ve been screeching at the wrong outrage!

    Read More
  16. @Anonymous
    Yes, white southerners should be left alone. But where are these same white southerners when it comes to leaving Iraqis alone. Or Afgahnis, or Russians, or Chinese, or etc etc.

    If these white southerners want to be left alone so much, why don't they first work on leaving the rest of the world alone too?

    +1

    Read More
  17. “Freedom is just another word for ‘nothing left to lose.’”

    93 million Americans have no job. Those who do are terrified of joining them. Half of those are employed, directly or indirectly, by government. If the food on your table is paid for by tax dollars, you’re not a likely revolutionary.

    With that said however, there is a palpable sense among the folks that the negro problem is at the boiling point. Yet wasn’t it there in the 90′s with the LA riot?

    The fundamental problem is that whites just have too much to lose. They won’t give up their big screen TV and new leased BMW in order to secure a future for their kids – let alone their grandkids or great-grandkids. They are so terrified of losing anything they’ll avert their gaze if they see a white man being brutally beaten or white woman raped by mob of negroes. We see this over and over again in videos of negro violence. They may step in to minister to injuries after the fact, but won’t lift a finger to help one of their own being assaulted.

    For generations now, whites have done nothing but run away. So while frustration and anger are boiling, the only thing that will happen is that they’ll move to the next outer ring suburb or more consciously avoid going anywhere the negroes will be. America is a big country – white folks can easily keep fleeing for another hundred years or more.

    Read More
  18. “…It could explode. It really could. You might be surprised how many people out there think, “Bring it on.” Not a good idea, but we go that way.

    Tick Tick. Tick.”

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win? (or better yet, who will lose?)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ragno

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win?
     
    Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force.
    , @anon
    In opportunity cost terms everyone will lose.
  19. @rod1963
    Undoubtedly the bi-coastal elites and their freak show followers hiding behind activist judges and a thug force of goosestepping Federal cops will push a bit too far and the people will start pushing back. I'm sure folks will protest peacefully at first, but dollars to donuts, the authorities will escalate to make a example out of those who resist them. They just can't help themselves since they are inveterate bullies and tyrants. That's when all hell will brake lose.

    Look they have SCOTUS, POTUS and Congress on their side, they are on a roll and they will push hard against us, basically stomping our faces into the dirt. Right now the Christian churches and Southern white Christian males are in their crosshairs thanks to the SCOTUS and the Root's murder spree. As Californian, it's quite apparent even to me, that the Feds are on a jihad against Johnny Reb and Southern Culture in general. They want to eradicate part of our history, heritage and culture. Fuck that shit.

    These freaks, ponces and worms have all but openly declared war against whites.

    Christian churches will fare no better. It is inevitable that the Gay taliban will force the issue by demanding say Catholic or Baptist churches sanctify gay marriage. And when they don't, there will be lawsuits, followed by threats by Gays then arrests of priests who refuse to follow state edicts. Expect churches to be shut down.

    Most won't raise a fuss, but some will. Some priests will be beaten or killed by the Feds or Gays to coerce the others into obedience, some will die mysteriously in while in police custody. People will start extracting revenge by then.

    Or it could be something else that starts it. it's hard to tell with this claque of power hungry lunatics. Like Forrest Gump said, "stupid is as stupid does".

    The obvious, to me anyway, answer for is for Christian priest, ministers, reverends and other religious like Rabbis, to simply resign their civil authority to legally marry people. Let ALL marriages per se be performed at the local courts or some civil bureau. Then, religious MARRIED couples can go to their particular church/minister and have him/her perform a religious, celebratory service of their marriage. This is similar to the civil/religious practice in much of the world. Churches will then EXERCISE their religious rules of one man & one woman to which none may object. Parishoners only please and, if you’re a gay couple, we don’t exercise that way. I don’t see any possible legal objection to that approach.

    It gets the churches out of marriage itself which, as we know, is just a contract. It keeps them in weddings however, especially religious weddings. It perfectly separates church from state and who can argue with that?

    I’ve argued this on my own site and, so far, nobody has even taken a shot at it.

    Try so it can be improved – thanks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Naidamast
    Actually, what you are suggesting is exactly how it is done in Russia, a country our government keeps on threatening every day with conflict...
    , @Bill Jones
    The problem is that the State is in the marriage business because it treats single and married people differently.
    , @Romanian
    Wait, this is news to me, and I'm philo-American... you mean to say that, in the US, the religious and the governmental aspects of the marriage process are performed at the same time? How does that even work? Does the Church issue your marriage license? Is the marriage even valid without a perfunctory religious seal of approval on it? I thought that it was standard practice all over Christendom (including the whole of continental Europe) to have something at the local mayor's office or some other official (for the actual paperwork and some monotonous words to the blushing taxpayers) and then just have a religious ceremony at your convenience (at a later date even). Generally, you have the party right after the religious ceremony.
    , @Anonymous
    When Massachusetts gays began pushing for gay marriage back in the 70's I thought they were shooting themselves in the feet. Believing what you suggest the most logical and certainly less divisive way to accomplish what they desired.

    As their idea gained some traction out my way I mentioned my idea to some of my gay San Francisco friends and co-workers and as I recall I was tarred and feathered by each and every one of them.

    Over the years I occasionally had the opportunity to voice this opinion to both gay and straight people and for the life of me I don't recall ever getting a single nod of a head.

    I'm not big on what if's but can you imagine the difference in our country over the past 40 years if your idea had been implemented? Or would the fundamentalists have gone to war anyway?
  20. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Only a moron would display a confederate flag! The KKK took it on as a symbol of it’s organization. Who would want to be associated with the KKK? Hopefully no one!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    Only a moron would believe your drivel.

    The democrats of the KKK had their preferred flag and it was this one
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/04/lew-rockwell/bristling-dixie/
  21. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    The Tribe controls America.

    The Tribe tells whites that their central duty is to

    1. Kiss Jewish butt

    2. Kiss homo butt

    3. Kiss mulatto butt

    And most whites comply like the wussies they are.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Don't forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??
  22. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Nothing is really possible unless the Narrative is changed with the TRUTH that:

    Evolution made blacks

    1. Stronger/tougher

    2. More aggressive.

    The real problem is biology, not history.

    https://www.facebook.com/Voxradio100.5/videos/519446868193839/

    https://www.facebook.com/JolietJake2008/videos/10202864505868275/

    Read More
  23. @Gene Su
    "...It could explode. It really could. You might be surprised how many people out there think, “Bring it on.” Not a good idea, but we go that way.

    Tick Tick. Tick."

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win? (or better yet, who will lose?)

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win?

    Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    "Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force."

    That would be the rich elite.
    , @Bob
    We're not still fighting WWII.
    , @Xopher Halftongue
    Gene Sue says:

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win?
     
    Ragno replies:

    Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force.
     
    Actually, it's more like... whoever seizes the nuclear weapons. Nukes are truly Wunderwaffen.
  24. @Anonymous
    Yes, white southerners should be left alone. But where are these same white southerners when it comes to leaving Iraqis alone. Or Afgahnis, or Russians, or Chinese, or etc etc.

    If these white southerners want to be left alone so much, why don't they first work on leaving the rest of the world alone too?

    Great point.

    Read More
  25. @Anonymous
    My cousin's family stopped by the Gettysburg battlefield last week and said they couldn't buy a Confederate flag in the national park gift shop. The clerk said the National Park Service removed all Confederate flags from the gift shops of the national park system nationwide. Soon the park service will claim the battle was between the Union and the Romulans.

    ” Soon the park service will claim the battle was between the Union and the Romulans.”

    Or the Borg….better yet the Cardassians who won the battle and have taken over our televisions with trailer trash ‘entertainment’.

    Read More
  26. @Ragno

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win?
     
    Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force.

    “Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force.”

    That would be the rich elite.

    Read More
  27. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Start with the premise that a guy shoots nine people dead, in an act of urban terrorism

    1 He is a southerner and so the liberals condemn all southerners and want to ban the Confederate battle flag because they claim it stands for / promotes hatred

    2 He is a Muslim and so liberals tell us not to condemn all Muslims because the man is not representative of the vast majority of Muslims. Similarly, they do not want to ban the Koran even though that book endorses slavery, murder of people who want to abandon Islam, and much more.

    In the same week that our gentleman shot nine people, various Muslim terrorist groups killed several hundred in Africa and Europe. The terrorist attacks disappeared from the papers after one day. The attack in south is hauled out and commented on nearly every day – little thoughtful analysis, just condemnation.

    Balance would be refreshing

    Read More
  28. @Anonymous
    Only a moron would display a confederate flag! The KKK took it on as a symbol of it's organization. Who would want to be associated with the KKK? Hopefully no one!!

    Only a moron would believe your drivel.

    The democrats of the KKK had their preferred flag and it was this one

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/04/lew-rockwell/bristling-dixie/

    Read More
    • Replies: @fnn
    The Second Klan (the Klan of the 1920s) was bipartisan-it was bigger outside the South than within it. It was also the last KKK of any significance. Well, maybe except for that unusually active West Virginia Klan that Robert Byrd belonged to in the 1940s-someone should write a book about that. The various ersatz klans of the 1950s and 1960s were inevitable byproducts of the much larger anti-desegregation movement.
  29. @Truth
    You foolish mortal.

    The confederate flag thing is another inflame and divert technique used to distract "high-IQ geniuses" such as yourself, as well at the "low IQ cretins" whom you constantly belittle, but in reality, more resemble, from thinking about more pertinent things: Such as logical solutions.

    The government did not stop the MK Ultra program because it didn't work, merely because there was less overhead simply disseminating the wanted information through a network of unpaid underlings, rabid with arrogance and self-pity.

    They spent, what?, may be 5 seconds mourning those 9 souls?

    And that profound Christian witness about forgiveness given by the families… Except for the Amish schoolhouse slaughter, I’ve never heard of it so powerfully demonstrated. And this time we got to see it with our own eyes.

    I really believed at the time that there would be all this focus on victims, the Christian woman who fearfully, but prayerfully, followed Dylann Roof which lead to his capture, their families, and how well Charleston came together.
    I never expected anything less from Charleston. Graceful as always and now the nation would see how wonderful all these people were in adversity. I used to live there and even fearfully looked up if any of my old friends and co-workers were among the dead.

    Naive. Almost completely ignored. The last article I read that even was about them before changing the subject to the southern white menace was from a Jewish perspective that forgiveness like this was wrong (Christianity is unique and confounding in this, but show some respect, please.) One shining spot was a long article about African-American Christianity and its beginnings.

    It just seems more an excuse to flay southern whites. 95% of the energy has gone to them versus the murdered victims by my reckoning.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I made a post yesterday about the very same thing. The name of the killer will always be remembered and connected with the fall of the Confederate Flag. The victims will soon be forgotten by most. The Governor used those people as a political stepping stone and their own people disgraced them by Using them to push and achieve Their own agenda.
    He said he wanted to start a race war. They fell for hook and line and ran with it. He won. His name is nation wide along with what He done and the fall out. He has done what he set out to do.
    There is division all across the nation.
    You would have thought that there would had been unity in Charleston and maybe talk of a memorial for the victims.
  30. you have hit the nail on the head, been thinking and saying that for several years.. Tick tick tick. For sure

    Read More
  31. @Ragno

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win?
     
    Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force.

    We’re not still fighting WWII.

    Read More
  32. Of course, there’s seething anger and discontent. But when have American whites ever “exploded” or taken intelligent action against the Power Elite? Well, there was y’know, and that time, and I kinda remember that thing with whatits.

    Nope. I wish there would be some sort of Populist uprising, but the American people are all talk and no action and they’ve always been like that. At least since 1900. Nope you’ll have to hit them hard in the only thing they truly care about – the wallet- $$$. Until large numbers of the middle class – not just the poor and working class – feel some real, outrageous, financial pain, things will go on like they have. As long as the Bourgeois can watch football, drink beer, and live in 3 bedroom 2 1/2 bath house, nothing will change.

    People seem to forget that Hitler was regarded as a harmless Crank in 1928, its only when Germany faced 30% unemployment in 1932 that he became dangerous. And it took WW1 to get rid of the Czar.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Flower
    "when have American whites ever “exploded” or taken intelligent action against the Power Elite?"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_Wall_Street
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_sit-down_strike
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Normandy
    http://www.usmarshals.gov/history/civilian/1967c.htm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy (although the word "intelligent" may preclude this one)
    http://jurist.org/feature/2013/12/a-history-and-the-main-acts.php
    http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

    (more examples upon request)
    Just sayin'.
  33. Jeepers Fred, it’s a flag and an offensive flag at that. What are you going to do, go out and shoot Lindsey Graham? Put up or shut up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @HLMunchkin
    You've seemed to miss the whole point as to what Fred alludes to in this piece. My take on it is, something very violent can take place. Violent to the point that blood will run in the streets. Not figuratively but literally.

    The authors of Jade Helm may see things very closely to what Fred senses that's in the air. If you are unaware of Jade Helm I'll excuse your ignorance. By the way exactly what is it that Fred has to put Up? Pray tell.
    , @Eustace Tilley (not)
    "...it's...an offensive flag at that." Not a "fact"; just your point of view.

    I actually find the 50-star US flag offensive. The 50th star represents Hawaii. Hawaii used to be an independent Polynesian kingdom in the northern Pacific ocean. They had their own currency (you can even buy it on eBay), foreign ambassadors, and everything. They even converted to Christianity. They never (as far as I am aware) attacked America. But it was the perfect location for pineapple plantations and naval bases, so...

    But if you still feel like flying "Old Glory", by all means, do so. I won't lay a guilt trip on you.
  34. They want to get rid of the confederate flag for the same reason that makes it impossible for me to find a nativity scene for the front yard at Christmas time. “They” prefer we have only meaningless lights or Frosty the Snowman.

    Read More
  35. The Confederate battle-flag is only offensive to neo-puritan trash who want to lord their holier-than-thou self-righteousness over everyone else in the US. Those morally-preening lot can’t stand dissent and so their totalitarian bent is exposed. They no more care a whit about the negroes now they claim to brotherly love than when they left 1/4 of them to die of deprivation, disease, and starvation in the wake of the War Of Northern Aggression.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    ah but we won our war so now whatcha gonna do? you can't even own your families or the fat flubbering over your trousers. Could you even run fast enough to fight anymore? Go eat some pork rinds and cheetoes.
  36. A Fred column that satisfies, at last. Of course, he does not talk about the mexicans, those folks he loves.

    I live in Silicon Valley. I drive around the fly-over West now and then in an RV and talk to people, ordinary people, not in the cities, countryish people, white people. They hate Washington, Liberals, “Niggers” , Mexers, Liberals, Liberals, and , if residing near a rez, they really hate Indians. The Jews do not much register with these folks, probably cuz of their low-rent Christianity, that luvs the OT and Jews. Of course these people got guns.

    Wanna really piss off a bull? wave a suitable red flag. Wanna really piss off a person, any person? Destroy their flag. Too bad the libs don’t really have a flag of their own. A Rainbow flag…nahh. looks like an ice cream ad.

    The thing is getting stirred up. I am waiting for the negroes to start shootin’ white folks. Bring it on Sambo. The liberals will never know what hit ‘em.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    • Replies: @leper messiah
    I am waiting for the negroes to start shootin’ white folks. Bring it on Sambo. The liberals will never know what hit ‘em.

    About a week ago, a white woman walking with her boyfriend on Sunset Blvd in LA was killed by a black man who jumped out of a car, causually walked up to her from behind and shot her in the back of the head. No robbery, no beating, no rape....just a shot to the head and he was out of there. Apparently, there was a similar phenomenon that took place back in the 70's by some extremist black muslim group, all of whom were eventually caught.

    So...it is already starting to happen. Pay attention to see if other incidents like this take place in the near-medium term future (if these crimes are allowed to get by the standard MSM blockade of white-on-black racial attacks). I would bet this is just the beginning.

  37. @Don Nash
    Jeepers Fred, it's a flag and an offensive flag at that. What are you going to do, go out and shoot Lindsey Graham? Put up or shut up.

    You’ve seemed to miss the whole point as to what Fred alludes to in this piece. My take on it is, something very violent can take place. Violent to the point that blood will run in the streets. Not figuratively but literally.

    The authors of Jade Helm may see things very closely to what Fred senses that’s in the air. If you are unaware of Jade Helm I’ll excuse your ignorance. By the way exactly what is it that Fred has to put Up? Pray tell.

    Read More
  38. By family tradition, birth & upbringing I myself am a NAG [Normal, Alias "Gentile"] white Southerner. As a young boy living in Ft. Worth, I went a short way North to Whitesboro near the OK State line to visit my great grandmother, who lived on a small farm near there and was blind in one eye. When she was a young girl, General Sherman’s troops had burnt down her house in Georgia during a blizzard, somehow causing thereby the loss of her eye, according to family lore. After the Yankee devastation, the Womacks migrated due West to our new Texas roost where I was visiting.

    I state my own background to indicate my particular personal interest in the white breed subset of our human race 7BAC ["Billion And Counting"]. All the previous articles by Fred Reed which I have read have been clever but this one’s despicable.

    I’m all for toting up murder totals and publishing the details. For me and for any reasonable person, the first and by far most important thing I want to know about any chance-met stranger = the latter’s status before the law: Be he [or] righteous or be he criminal? I will also mention that, technically, I am probably still the most famous shooter in the City of San Francisco, California, due to a highly publicized incident in October of 1993 which was also written up in the “Armed Citizen” column of the AMERICAN RIFLEMAN. The guy I shot in self-defense, to wide popular acclaim, was one Dallas Johnson, an armed colored stooge (with a white accomplice) set on by the DEA to spoil my public organizing effort with the late Terence McKenna. The narcs’ plan worked.

    By that blazing word “law” above BTW I refer to such fundamental principles as serve justice only rather than to any of the wicked absurdities promulgated by JAR [JewAmerican Regime].

    I have had professional training at the highest level in world politics and am a long-time amateur master of the ancient oriental game of strategy known to the Koreans as _baduk_. A former highly effective disciple of the great Ho Chi Minh here in the USA for a dozen years during war time until our final victory in 1975, I began publishing on Usenet newsgroups in 1994. The Google Groups Page tonight shows [Posts: 10340] mentioning my name, down from 12K earlier, for some reason.

    Again I cite personal background to indicate that when I charge against the USGov roughly 30,000,000 [thirty million] murders worldwide since 1946, that accusation is _honte_*, as the Nips say.

    Now to return to the question of the day re American colors: The Jews on top ( <3% of the pop) hire the whites as secret police & like manner of assorted gun thugs to stand on the heads of the colored folk, who are now actually the national majority already, let alone the world immensity.

    The future for our white breed lies in integrating ourselves into our rainbow race as a whole and overthrowing JAT [Tyranny]. Julia Ward Howe, Mark Twain & Tim Leary will shake hands with Frederick Douglass, Satchmo, Bob Marley, Muhammad Ali, Diego Rivera, Rigoberta Menchu and Evo Morales –just to get the show started, as it were.

    Whereas the guilty Jews in their desperation at the collapse of their empire of MULL [MUrder, Looting & Lying] wish to stir the Merkin colors against each other, just as they have set Sunni against Shia in the Middle East. Yawanna try on that car bomb for size? Fred Reed is trying to lure us down that road of treason, madness and destruction.

    Which way will the reader choose?
    ……………………………..
    * [Honte is a Japanese go term meaning, the proper move. It is a solid play that leaves few or no weaknesses behind and has a followup.]

    http://senseis.xmp.net/?Honte

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    Hal Womack used to be an acquaintance until his Maoism and negro luvin and white hating just became too much. He is an outcast in his own family, gordo in girth, and just a bizarre guy.

    HIs anti-semitism is such that he thinks the reason communism was bad in USSR was the Jews and only the Jews, and that Chairman Mao , being not Jewish, got it all straightened out.

    Hi Hal, nice to hear you bellow. And how is your welfare mooching going?
    SSI, or whatever, cuz he is so fat he cannot get to the job, not that he wants one.
    Joe Webb
  39. (eye roll)

    Kind of sick of these chicken hawk old guys saying shit like this. Meanwhile, you fled the country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Flower
    Yes, that is an ongoing point when reading Fred. However, good advice from a Chinaman who has never left China is still good advice. Why Fred "fled" (and I don't agree with the word, but oh well) is probably Fred's business and nobody else's; but, due to reading between previous Fred lines, I suspect Fred became an Ex-Pat for the same reason a lot of men do really stupid shite: some woman and their own testosterone frenzied brain.
  40. no, sorry, the revolution will not occur….probably not, anyway…

    there is a possible avenue for revolution…that being a constitutional convention of the state legislatures…wherein 38 state legislatures could convene and pass constitutional amendments sending power back to the states….the GOP currently has 31 state legislatures…

    but the GOP establishment is not talking about this avenue, and the so-called “Dissident” Right mostly prefers to just bloviate and verbally attack liberals.

    So, no. No revolution.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    The Republicans want to misuse the power of the Presidency just as much as the Democrats. Local party hacks want to be national party hacks. Do you expect them to break ranks with the guys in Washington.
  41. Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs. Has it happened somewhere before? Sure, and you provide us with some examples. I can provide you counter examples — just recently a man in Baltimore, who became a celebrity of sorts after going to the local police station to report his mugging only to be told it was closed), had his bike stolen by a group of black teenagers, a fairly large group of them. Was he beaten, no. He had his bike stolen. Not nice, shouldn’t happen, but he wasn’t beaten. I heard him recount his experience on our locally produced public radio show.

    Whites are plenty violent and vicious — just look at all the wars. Violence committed by the state is acceptable, but violence by individuals is “beyond the pale”? Get real.

    And we’ve never heard you criticize the ridiculous and unctuous influence that rabidly Zionist Jews have on American foreign policy. Those who level that criticism are correct. You also seem naive enough to believe the adage “Jews are smarter …..” Bullshit. I’ve never met or heard a Jew who I thought was smarter than I. The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation”. That’s the key to their power and influence, not their IQ.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sunbeam
    "I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs."

    Yeah, right. Of course all the news items you see linked here, or just about anything on that World Hip Hop site, well those don't exist right?

    And you know you could just make a quick trip down to the police station and ask them. And my spidey senses are tingling... just where do you live in Baltimore? To use the parlance do you live in a SWPL enclave?

    "The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation”

    As for this, I'm not really sure. Sure seems the way things work in the real world. Thinking back to college, I can't really say that any of my oriental or Indian professors seemed brighter or more clever than the white ones.

    But over time the numbers proliferated. Seems to me that you could make a game theory kind of thing with this phenomena.

    What's more powerful than a bunch of individualistic geniuses? A close knit tribe of pretty smart people that always, always choose what is in the interest of their particular group.

    Seems like a fundamental law of human nature to me.
    , @Eustace Tilley (not)


    Ave, Gaius Quercus Africanus!

    I was beaten (not severely) by a gang of four blacks on the Driving Park Bridge in Rochester, NY, two years ago. After dialing 911, I waited for two hours for the police, who never showed. That was not the first time I was assaulted by blacks (a gang of nine or so robbed me of my Rolex in Fuerth, Germany in 1972).

    I live in a mixed black/latino neighborhood in Rochester. I like most of my black neighbors and I like to think they like me well enough. I feel I am being sincere when I say I do not dislike blacks in general.

    But Fred's piece resonates with me because the bottom 10% or so of blacks are not just as dumb as a sack of rocks (that's not my problem); they are impulsively violent. The biggest victims, of course, are the blacks around them. Black lives do matter; that's the main reason why careless disrespectful self-absorbed impulsive sensual impressionable violent criminal black males are such a problem in this country. I will call them "niggers" because that's what they call themselves. (They can most readily be identified from a distance by their odd sartorial custom of wearing their belts below their ani.)

    The "official" media and the government do not want to even discuss this issue, much less face it head-on. The fact that all the politicians' "honest discussions about race" scrupulously avoid discussing this just shows that it is the 900-lb. gorilla in the room. But as Bob Marley sang, "But one day the bottom will drop out. Yes, one day the bottom will drop out."
    , @anon

    I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs.
     
    liar
    , @Gene Su
    "Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs."

    You must live in some lily white enclave of the city and are utterly clueless. Having said that, I have to empathize with you. I grew up in a lower-middle, working class white suburb of New Jersey. I dreaded going to elemantary school because of the pricks that would torment me and I disliked the white teachers who wouldn't raise a finger to protect me (although they would be far more protective of their own brood). I am saying this because many of the nasty accusations that "racialists" would hurl at minority-populated inner-city public schools can also be applied to white-populated suburban schools, albeit to a lesser degree.

    It wasn't until I moved to New York that I saw blacks who behaved in the way described by "racialists". By the way, what really purified me of white guilt was not being mugged on the subway but reading the messed up tracts printed by the Nation of Islam.
    , @Bill Jones
    You really could use a less tangential relationship with reality.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States

    Blacks commit homicides at rates approximately 8 times higher than whites do.
    , @Lucas
    You are insane to think a race war isn't already happening and even more ignorant to the realities of race. You are a whitecuck and the enemy.

    FBI statistics below
    Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 20,309
    Black on Black: 21,104
    Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 11,610
    Black on Black: 35,330
    Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black : 0
    Black on White: 37,460
    Black on Black: 36, 620
    Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 32, 443
    Black on Black: 7,705
    Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 14,092
    Black on Black: 12,780
    Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 19,292
    Black on Black: 34,841
    Total over six conservative years:
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 135,206
    Black on Black: 148,380
  42. @Bill Jones
    Only a moron would believe your drivel.

    The democrats of the KKK had their preferred flag and it was this one
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/04/lew-rockwell/bristling-dixie/

    The Second Klan (the Klan of the 1920s) was bipartisan-it was bigger outside the South than within it. It was also the last KKK of any significance. Well, maybe except for that unusually active West Virginia Klan that Robert Byrd belonged to in the 1940s-someone should write a book about that. The various ersatz klans of the 1950s and 1960s were inevitable byproducts of the much larger anti-desegregation movement.

    Read More
  43. @Anonymous
    Yes, white southerners should be left alone. But where are these same white southerners when it comes to leaving Iraqis alone. Or Afgahnis, or Russians, or Chinese, or etc etc.

    If these white southerners want to be left alone so much, why don't they first work on leaving the rest of the world alone too?

    Anon has spoken a splendid truth. A subjugated South becomes a cornerstone of support for the American Empire abroad. I agree with the article writer’s sentiment wholly, but our lack of intellectual purity/consistency worries me.

    Read More
  44. @Don Nash
    Jeepers Fred, it's a flag and an offensive flag at that. What are you going to do, go out and shoot Lindsey Graham? Put up or shut up.

    “…it’s…an offensive flag at that.” Not a “fact”; just your point of view.

    I actually find the 50-star US flag offensive. The 50th star represents Hawaii. Hawaii used to be an independent Polynesian kingdom in the northern Pacific ocean. They had their own currency (you can even buy it on eBay), foreign ambassadors, and everything. They even converted to Christianity. They never (as far as I am aware) attacked America. But it was the perfect location for pineapple plantations and naval bases, so…

    But if you still feel like flying “Old Glory”, by all means, do so. I won’t lay a guilt trip on you.

    Read More
  45. @quercus
    Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I've lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who's been beaten silly by black gangs. Has it happened somewhere before? Sure, and you provide us with some examples. I can provide you counter examples -- just recently a man in Baltimore, who became a celebrity of sorts after going to the local police station to report his mugging only to be told it was closed), had his bike stolen by a group of black teenagers, a fairly large group of them. Was he beaten, no. He had his bike stolen. Not nice, shouldn't happen, but he wasn't beaten. I heard him recount his experience on our locally produced public radio show.

    Whites are plenty violent and vicious -- just look at all the wars. Violence committed by the state is acceptable, but violence by individuals is "beyond the pale"? Get real.

    And we've never heard you criticize the ridiculous and unctuous influence that rabidly Zionist Jews have on American foreign policy. Those who level that criticism are correct. You also seem naive enough to believe the adage "Jews are smarter ....." Bullshit. I've never met or heard a Jew who I thought was smarter than I. The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation". That's the key to their power and influence, not their IQ.

    “I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs.”

    Yeah, right. Of course all the news items you see linked here, or just about anything on that World Hip Hop site, well those don’t exist right?

    And you know you could just make a quick trip down to the police station and ask them. And my spidey senses are tingling… just where do you live in Baltimore? To use the parlance do you live in a SWPL enclave?

    “The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation”

    As for this, I’m not really sure. Sure seems the way things work in the real world. Thinking back to college, I can’t really say that any of my oriental or Indian professors seemed brighter or more clever than the white ones.

    But over time the numbers proliferated. Seems to me that you could make a game theory kind of thing with this phenomena.

    What’s more powerful than a bunch of individualistic geniuses? A close knit tribe of pretty smart people that always, always choose what is in the interest of their particular group.

    Seems like a fundamental law of human nature to me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @fnn
    James La Fond is a veteran martial arts trainer who lives in Baltimore:

    http://www.isegoria.net/2015/07/propertiless-humanity-of-the-lowest-order/

    For instance, on the bus I am in Dodge, a policed coach with government recording devices abundant and in plain sight. And, in most cases, as soon as I get off the bus I am in Indian Country, surrounded by propertiless humanity of the lowest order.

    The absence of ownership, of being tied to a house, a vehicle, a law suit-friendly portfolio, or a garnish-ready wage, all makes a person more belligerent than they would otherwise be. The liberal slave masters have made of their urban slaves a ready force of aggressors. For they have tasted of abundance beyond the dreams of most working class people for two weeks of every month, and have also been deprived of a regular income, with monthly income distributions insuring times of want through the very lack of disciplined self-sufficiency denied the slave on the dole. Since a person raised on the welfare plantation is put in a position that weakens impulse control, inculcates a sense of entitlement only rivaled by medieval nobility, and at the same time denies property, he is uniquely prone to violent action of both the predatory and social variety.

    Therefore, unlike the savage Indian who had excellent impulse control, the savage urbanite is likely to engage in escalated anger-based combat due to perceived insults to his entitled status, making him a dueling or brawling risk on the order of a medieval knight. At the same time, his condition of moral want and social isolation make him a predatory threat due to his purposeful alienation at the hands of his duplicitous slave master. In one person the hoodrat represents the risk of being hunted by an aboriginal savage in his native habitat, and of running afoul of the belligerent medieval dimwit on the road to his drawbridge.
     
    , @Anonymous
    Please look up the definition of "oriental" and "Asian". You're discussing race related issues as though you have a clear and rational viewpoint. Yet you are being racist by calling someone "oriental". In my opinion, people hating others based on race instead of respecting them for who they are is what will breed more hate.
  46. “We now see forced hiring of the incompetent as a right, endless accounts of blacks destroying shopping malls, burning cities, brutally attacking whites in gangs, and the giving to blacks of anything they want because they are black.”

    Hyper-ramped rhetoric, folks.

    “At some point, the Saxon will begin to hate.”

    Those Southrons who cling on to the Confederate flag and pre-Civil War life already hate.

    “They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis.”

    The gummint? Really?

    “But there presence may push more Hispanic families – ones not quite so decent – to move into your neighborhood. Over time, the neighborhood turns into a Barrio because of that first, nice family.”

    If a family regardless of race or ethnic background makes middle to upper-middle class money, they are generally going to keep the neighborhood looking like their neighbors. So your example doesn’t cut it here.

    “As Californian, it’s quite apparent even to me, that the Feds are on a jihad against Johnny Reb and Southern Culture in general. They want to eradicate part of our history, heritage and culture.”

    Against Johnny Reb, assuredly. Southern Culture? You have your guns and whiskey. Even Yankees love those two things!

    “They are so terrified of losing anything they’ll avert their gaze if they see a white man being brutally beaten or white woman raped by mob of negroes.”

    With cell phones, people who see those types of crimes call the police.

    “And most whites comply like the wussies they are.”

    Please define “white”.

    “America is governed by two corporate controlled parties in which any populist candidate gets stomped on.”

    Why don’t you run for office rather than run your mouth? See, that’s the problem with a lot of folks here. All talk, no action. Work to gain control of local politics, then work up the ladder.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wyrd
    Please define “white”.

    Something beside your tired ass.

    , @Curle

    If a family regardless of race or ethnic background makes middle to upper-middle class money, they are generally going to keep the neighborhood looking like their neighbors. So your example doesn’t cut it here.
     
    No, they make the neighborhood a more comfortable place for lower income blacks to visit. Crime goes up as the lower income blacks find things worth stealing and whites begin to flee creating a death spiral for home values. Sailer has been saying something to this effect for years. The fact that your middle class black neighbors will be victims as well doesn't alleviate the predictability of the process nor the damage done to the value of your home/asset.
  47. @leftist conservative
    no, sorry, the revolution will not occur....probably not, anyway...

    there is a possible avenue for revolution...that being a constitutional convention of the state legislatures...wherein 38 state legislatures could convene and pass constitutional amendments sending power back to the states....the GOP currently has 31 state legislatures...

    but the GOP establishment is not talking about this avenue, and the so-called "Dissident" Right mostly prefers to just bloviate and verbally attack liberals.

    So, no. No revolution.

    The Republicans want to misuse the power of the Presidency just as much as the Democrats. Local party hacks want to be national party hacks. Do you expect them to break ranks with the guys in Washington.

    Read More
    • Replies: @leftist conservative

    The Republicans want to misuse the power of the Presidency just as much as the Democrats. Local party hacks want to be national party hacks. Do you expect them to break ranks with the guys in Washington.
     
    Well, of course they do. ...but you want to increase the control that the majority has over the government. That is the goal. So, you have a goal and you want to achieve it. How does one achieve any goal? You find out what you need to do, and you do it.

    What do we need to do to achieve more control over our politicians?

    Well, you want as united an electorate as possible.

    Which is more united? the national electorate or the state electorate? How about the electorate at the county level? At the city level? In general, what can you say about the unity of the electorate at these different levels?

    Start from fundamental principles. You determine/induce these principles, discover what they are, and then ya write 'em down. You codify them.

    Then you go out and find allies. You say to them, "Hey, look what I found!"

    And then you all start to achieve this goal.

    How do you do it? You start at the city level. You say, "we are going to elect politicians, starting at the local level, that want to call an article 5 constitutional convention and amend the constitution to send more power back to the states."

    It's a process. It starts at the local level. You elect politicians who want to do this and they educate the public. It will take years. One step at a time.
    , @Realist
    One more bit of proof democracy doesn't work.
  48. @Anonymous
    Yes, white southerners should be left alone. But where are these same white southerners when it comes to leaving Iraqis alone. Or Afgahnis, or Russians, or Chinese, or etc etc.

    If these white southerners want to be left alone so much, why don't they first work on leaving the rest of the world alone too?

    Weeeellll, an interesting assertation, so let’s check it out.

    Starting at the top:
    President Barak Obama from? Illinois.
    Vice President (and Prez of the Senate) Joe Biden from? Delaware
    Speaker of the House John Boehner from? Ohio
    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid from? Nevada
    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey from? New Jersey
    CEO Lockheed-Martin Marilyn Hewson from? Kansas
    Hillary Clinton, Dem front runner for Prez and General Pain In The Ass from? She claims NY citizenship, but we all know she is from the Planet Xylon III.
    Jewish Rabble Rouser Bibi Netenyahu from? Well it ain’t Dixie.

    Yeah, you gots lots and lots of Dixie Good Ol’ Boys in that list, huh?

    Read More
  49. This piece is so ridiculous. A white supremacist murders a group of innocents who welcomed him in a church. The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness. Yet the overall reaction in this essay and many of the comments are implying an impending race war. Unbelievable.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    You left out the part where the minute this happened the Social Justice Warriors sprang into action denouncing everybody in the south, demanding the Confederate flag be removed everywhere, and that white people everywhere beg for forgiveness for their crimes. However had this been a black or Muslim, none of this would have happened. That's what the story and comments are about.
    , @Sunbeam
    "This piece is so ridiculous. A white supremacist murders a group of innocents who welcomed him in a church."

    I'd be willing to bet that most days since this incident that the 14% or so of America that is black, has beaten his body count with black on white murders. Heck there is an outside chance they beat it that day (but I dunno Sunday is kinda slow after the AM hours).

    Just like it has been for a long, long time. Care to address this statistic? It exists. What do you have to say about it?

    "The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness."

    You mean the community and the family members in question got microphones and camera shoved in their faces, and they recited the mantra. Just like everyone does when in a situation like this.

    "Yet the overall reaction in this essay and many of the comments are implying an impending race war. Unbelievable."

    Could happen. I tend to think that the US really doesn't have a whole lot going for us right now. A good dose of sudden "austerity" is going to make for a lot of unhappy campers. If the money isn't there for the "hologram" (as Joe Bageant put it), or I guess you could say subsidized sofas and cable tv... well lots could happen. These (and I'm not addressing any particular ethnic group) people just aren't the types that can handle this sort of thing. And we have so many fracture points waiting to happen.

    But otherwise we aren't going to see a race war. Brazil is where we are headed. Barring some sudden shock (which could easily happen).
    , @anon

    The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness.
     
    Yes *they* acted admirably.

    However the media are taking the incident and using it as anti-white propaganda.
  50. @MarkinLA
    The Republicans want to misuse the power of the Presidency just as much as the Democrats. Local party hacks want to be national party hacks. Do you expect them to break ranks with the guys in Washington.

    The Republicans want to misuse the power of the Presidency just as much as the Democrats. Local party hacks want to be national party hacks. Do you expect them to break ranks with the guys in Washington.

    Well, of course they do. …but you want to increase the control that the majority has over the government. That is the goal. So, you have a goal and you want to achieve it. How does one achieve any goal? You find out what you need to do, and you do it.

    What do we need to do to achieve more control over our politicians?

    Well, you want as united an electorate as possible.

    Which is more united? the national electorate or the state electorate? How about the electorate at the county level? At the city level? In general, what can you say about the unity of the electorate at these different levels?

    Start from fundamental principles. You determine/induce these principles, discover what they are, and then ya write ‘em down. You codify them.

    Then you go out and find allies. You say to them, “Hey, look what I found!”

    And then you all start to achieve this goal.

    How do you do it? You start at the city level. You say, “we are going to elect politicians, starting at the local level, that want to call an article 5 constitutional convention and amend the constitution to send more power back to the states.”

    It’s a process. It starts at the local level. You elect politicians who want to do this and they educate the public. It will take years. One step at a time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    The problem is party hacks. There used to be this guy in the southern California area, Tom McClintok. At the local level he was a constant budget hawk - the kind of guy you would think you would send to Washington to take power back to the states.

    The last I heard of him was WND article where he was crying that it was a mistake for the Republicans to not use the power of the purse to stop amnesty. Of course, he wished he could redo the vote. He got to Washington and immediately turned into a turd.
    , @AnalogMan
    “we are going to elect politicians, starting at the local level, that want to call an article 5 constitutional convention and amend the constitution to send more power back to the states.”

    You already have a constitution that reserves power to the states. How's that working?
  51. I think most are studiously missing Fred’s point: Payback is a Bitch. The brouhaha over the “Confederate” Flag is silly, demeaning to anyone with an IQ over 85, and, really, truly, counter-productive. But in some fit of, of, of…I just can’t come up with a word here. Is there a word or phrase that describes a mindless insistence of trivia? I know, how about this: arrogant ignorance.

    What Fred is trying to explain is that with each of these displays of arrogant ignorance over something that should have been gotten over with by 1975 is creating a pressure among whites. It’s a small pressure right now, most whites are still falling for the Jewish Grandmother approach of “rule by guilt”, but it is growing. And unless that pressure is stopped, well, if you want to know what happens when you piss off white America, just ask the Japanese.

    Read More
  52. @Pure and Easy
    This piece is so ridiculous. A white supremacist murders a group of innocents who welcomed him in a church. The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness. Yet the overall reaction in this essay and many of the comments are implying an impending race war. Unbelievable.

    You left out the part where the minute this happened the Social Justice Warriors sprang into action denouncing everybody in the south, demanding the Confederate flag be removed everywhere, and that white people everywhere beg for forgiveness for their crimes. However had this been a black or Muslim, none of this would have happened. That’s what the story and comments are about.

    Read More
  53. @leftist conservative

    The Republicans want to misuse the power of the Presidency just as much as the Democrats. Local party hacks want to be national party hacks. Do you expect them to break ranks with the guys in Washington.
     
    Well, of course they do. ...but you want to increase the control that the majority has over the government. That is the goal. So, you have a goal and you want to achieve it. How does one achieve any goal? You find out what you need to do, and you do it.

    What do we need to do to achieve more control over our politicians?

    Well, you want as united an electorate as possible.

    Which is more united? the national electorate or the state electorate? How about the electorate at the county level? At the city level? In general, what can you say about the unity of the electorate at these different levels?

    Start from fundamental principles. You determine/induce these principles, discover what they are, and then ya write 'em down. You codify them.

    Then you go out and find allies. You say to them, "Hey, look what I found!"

    And then you all start to achieve this goal.

    How do you do it? You start at the city level. You say, "we are going to elect politicians, starting at the local level, that want to call an article 5 constitutional convention and amend the constitution to send more power back to the states."

    It's a process. It starts at the local level. You elect politicians who want to do this and they educate the public. It will take years. One step at a time.

    The problem is party hacks. There used to be this guy in the southern California area, Tom McClintok. At the local level he was a constant budget hawk – the kind of guy you would think you would send to Washington to take power back to the states.

    The last I heard of him was WND article where he was crying that it was a mistake for the Republicans to not use the power of the purse to stop amnesty. Of course, he wished he could redo the vote. He got to Washington and immediately turned into a turd.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hare Krishna
    McClintock represents Northern California, not Southern California. Unless you think of north of Sacramento as "Southern" California.
  54. @Sunbeam
    "I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs."

    Yeah, right. Of course all the news items you see linked here, or just about anything on that World Hip Hop site, well those don't exist right?

    And you know you could just make a quick trip down to the police station and ask them. And my spidey senses are tingling... just where do you live in Baltimore? To use the parlance do you live in a SWPL enclave?

    "The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation”

    As for this, I'm not really sure. Sure seems the way things work in the real world. Thinking back to college, I can't really say that any of my oriental or Indian professors seemed brighter or more clever than the white ones.

    But over time the numbers proliferated. Seems to me that you could make a game theory kind of thing with this phenomena.

    What's more powerful than a bunch of individualistic geniuses? A close knit tribe of pretty smart people that always, always choose what is in the interest of their particular group.

    Seems like a fundamental law of human nature to me.

    James La Fond is a veteran martial arts trainer who lives in Baltimore:

    http://www.isegoria.net/2015/07/propertiless-humanity-of-the-lowest-order/

    For instance, on the bus I am in Dodge, a policed coach with government recording devices abundant and in plain sight. And, in most cases, as soon as I get off the bus I am in Indian Country, surrounded by propertiless humanity of the lowest order.

    The absence of ownership, of being tied to a house, a vehicle, a law suit-friendly portfolio, or a garnish-ready wage, all makes a person more belligerent than they would otherwise be. The liberal slave masters have made of their urban slaves a ready force of aggressors. For they have tasted of abundance beyond the dreams of most working class people for two weeks of every month, and have also been deprived of a regular income, with monthly income distributions insuring times of want through the very lack of disciplined self-sufficiency denied the slave on the dole. Since a person raised on the welfare plantation is put in a position that weakens impulse control, inculcates a sense of entitlement only rivaled by medieval nobility, and at the same time denies property, he is uniquely prone to violent action of both the predatory and social variety.

    Therefore, unlike the savage Indian who had excellent impulse control, the savage urbanite is likely to engage in escalated anger-based combat due to perceived insults to his entitled status, making him a dueling or brawling risk on the order of a medieval knight. At the same time, his condition of moral want and social isolation make him a predatory threat due to his purposeful alienation at the hands of his duplicitous slave master. In one person the hoodrat represents the risk of being hunted by an aboriginal savage in his native habitat, and of running afoul of the belligerent medieval dimwit on the road to his drawbridge.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Billy Chav
    LaFond is almost always worth reading. His characterization of "absence of ownership" as a defining quality of the urban feral is spot on. Whenever I get close to some kind of gnarly encounter I remind myself that they have nothing to lose, I have everything to lose. That will really tie a hand behind your back, but it's the way it is.

    Really can't recommend him highly enough.

    http://www.jameslafond.com/

  55. @Pure and Easy
    This piece is so ridiculous. A white supremacist murders a group of innocents who welcomed him in a church. The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness. Yet the overall reaction in this essay and many of the comments are implying an impending race war. Unbelievable.

    “This piece is so ridiculous. A white supremacist murders a group of innocents who welcomed him in a church.”

    I’d be willing to bet that most days since this incident that the 14% or so of America that is black, has beaten his body count with black on white murders. Heck there is an outside chance they beat it that day (but I dunno Sunday is kinda slow after the AM hours).

    Just like it has been for a long, long time. Care to address this statistic? It exists. What do you have to say about it?

    “The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness.”

    You mean the community and the family members in question got microphones and camera shoved in their faces, and they recited the mantra. Just like everyone does when in a situation like this.

    “Yet the overall reaction in this essay and many of the comments are implying an impending race war. Unbelievable.”

    Could happen. I tend to think that the US really doesn’t have a whole lot going for us right now. A good dose of sudden “austerity” is going to make for a lot of unhappy campers. If the money isn’t there for the “hologram” (as Joe Bageant put it), or I guess you could say subsidized sofas and cable tv… well lots could happen. These (and I’m not addressing any particular ethnic group) people just aren’t the types that can handle this sort of thing. And we have so many fracture points waiting to happen.

    But otherwise we aren’t going to see a race war. Brazil is where we are headed. Barring some sudden shock (which could easily happen).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pure and Easy
    Thanks for reaffirming my initial comment. You sound like a certain manifesto that was written by someone now in a SC jail.
  56. WHY WAS THE CONFEDERATE FLAG taken down? Because Dylan Roof was able to buy a Confederate flag which he used to kill nine black people!! New York State will eliminate all Confederate flags with pistol grips or other features such as flash arrestors and muzzle brakes.

    Read More
  57. I gonna leave flags, songs, causes, and symbols to the symbol minded.

    What bothers Fred most about the ‘other’ people is his own flaws.

    Read More
  58. @joe webb
    A Fred column that satisfies, at last. Of course, he does not talk about the mexicans, those folks he loves.

    I live in Silicon Valley. I drive around the fly-over West now and then in an RV and talk to people, ordinary people, not in the cities, countryish people, white people. They hate Washington, Liberals, "Niggers" , Mexers, Liberals, Liberals, and , if residing near a rez, they really hate Indians. The Jews do not much register with these folks, probably cuz of their low-rent Christianity, that luvs the OT and Jews. Of course these people got guns.

    Wanna really piss off a bull? wave a suitable red flag. Wanna really piss off a person, any person? Destroy their flag. Too bad the libs don't really have a flag of their own. A Rainbow flag...nahh. looks like an ice cream ad.

    The thing is getting stirred up. I am waiting for the negroes to start shootin' white folks. Bring it on Sambo. The liberals will never know what hit 'em.

    Joe Webb

    I am waiting for the negroes to start shootin’ white folks. Bring it on Sambo. The liberals will never know what hit ‘em.

    About a week ago, a white woman walking with her boyfriend on Sunset Blvd in LA was killed by a black man who jumped out of a car, causually walked up to her from behind and shot her in the back of the head. No robbery, no beating, no rape….just a shot to the head and he was out of there. Apparently, there was a similar phenomenon that took place back in the 70′s by some extremist black muslim group, all of whom were eventually caught.

    So…it is already starting to happen. Pay attention to see if other incidents like this take place in the near-medium term future (if these crimes are allowed to get by the standard MSM blockade of white-on-black racial attacks). I would bet this is just the beginning.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    you are talking about the Zebra killings I think. They were some kind of black muzzles who had to kill some whites for initiation.

    Interesting logic they had: you had to kill , say 5 white men, three white women or one or two white kids. Killing the kids showed you had real black balls.

    As I recall, statewide in CA abut 70 killings of Whites. There would have been more but the negroids only had a .32 . As I recall , they shot Art Agnos, a politician in SF...in the back and he did not even notice it till later.

    They also went in for mayhem, torture.

    Joe Webb
  59. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    I agree with you. But what a mess to raise children in. God plz have mercy on such a sick perverted self centered society. And also plz tell them to pull there pants up.

    Read More
  60. @27 year old
    (eye roll)

    Kind of sick of these chicken hawk old guys saying shit like this. Meanwhile, you fled the country.

    Yes, that is an ongoing point when reading Fred. However, good advice from a Chinaman who has never left China is still good advice. Why Fred “fled” (and I don’t agree with the word, but oh well) is probably Fred’s business and nobody else’s; but, due to reading between previous Fred lines, I suspect Fred became an Ex-Pat for the same reason a lot of men do really stupid shite: some woman and their own testosterone frenzied brain.

    Read More
    • Replies: @leper messiah
    I suspect Fred became an Ex-Pat for the same reason a lot of men do really stupid shite: some woman and their own testosterone frenzied brain.

    Some people claim that there's a woman to blame....
  61. @Anonymous
    Yes, white southerners should be left alone. But where are these same white southerners when it comes to leaving Iraqis alone. Or Afgahnis, or Russians, or Chinese, or etc etc.

    If these white southerners want to be left alone so much, why don't they first work on leaving the rest of the world alone too?

    Southerners are disproportionately represented in the Army and the Marine Corps. I’m not sure about the other services. Southern White Christian clergy tend to celebrate the military. On the other hand, the best voices against warmongering among Congressional Republicans since about 2005 have been Paul of Texas, Duncan of Tennessee, Paul of Kentucky, Jones of North Carolina, and Hostettler of southern Indiana.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill
    Ron Paul is not from Texas. Have you heard the man talk? Pittsburgh.
  62. @Honesthughgrant
    Of course, there's seething anger and discontent. But when have American whites ever "exploded" or taken intelligent action against the Power Elite? Well, there was y'know, and that time, and I kinda remember that thing with whatits.

    Nope. I wish there would be some sort of Populist uprising, but the American people are all talk and no action and they've always been like that. At least since 1900. Nope you'll have to hit them hard in the only thing they truly care about - the wallet- $$$. Until large numbers of the middle class - not just the poor and working class - feel some real, outrageous, financial pain, things will go on like they have. As long as the Bourgeois can watch football, drink beer, and live in 3 bedroom 2 1/2 bath house, nothing will change.

    People seem to forget that Hitler was regarded as a harmless Crank in 1928, its only when Germany faced 30% unemployment in 1932 that he became dangerous. And it took WW1 to get rid of the Czar.
    Read More
    • Replies: @Honesthughgrant
    Congratulations, you've opened my eyes to the intelligence of Fred's comment section. Did you actually read past the first couple sentences- or did you even understand what I was saying? Do you understand who the power elite is? Do you know American history? I don't think so.

    And I'm always astounded how people will put the dumbest interpretation on any comment and then go from there.
    , @Bill
    You are deluded to an amazing degree.
  63. Seems like most whites are either leaving the U.S., irrevocably whipped, drugged up, or giddy about end times. Who will be doing this rebelling against the DC elites? Probably people of color. I think the biggest threat to the political classes will be when the monied elite no longer need them. It’s why I find the TPP kinda amusing.

    Read More
  64. @MarkinLA
    The Republicans want to misuse the power of the Presidency just as much as the Democrats. Local party hacks want to be national party hacks. Do you expect them to break ranks with the guys in Washington.

    One more bit of proof democracy doesn’t work.

    Read More
  65. Eustace Tilley (not) [AKA "Schiller/Nietzsche"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @quercus
    Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I've lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who's been beaten silly by black gangs. Has it happened somewhere before? Sure, and you provide us with some examples. I can provide you counter examples -- just recently a man in Baltimore, who became a celebrity of sorts after going to the local police station to report his mugging only to be told it was closed), had his bike stolen by a group of black teenagers, a fairly large group of them. Was he beaten, no. He had his bike stolen. Not nice, shouldn't happen, but he wasn't beaten. I heard him recount his experience on our locally produced public radio show.

    Whites are plenty violent and vicious -- just look at all the wars. Violence committed by the state is acceptable, but violence by individuals is "beyond the pale"? Get real.

    And we've never heard you criticize the ridiculous and unctuous influence that rabidly Zionist Jews have on American foreign policy. Those who level that criticism are correct. You also seem naive enough to believe the adage "Jews are smarter ....." Bullshit. I've never met or heard a Jew who I thought was smarter than I. The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation". That's the key to their power and influence, not their IQ.

    Ave, Gaius Quercus Africanus!

    I was beaten (not severely) by a gang of four blacks on the Driving Park Bridge in Rochester, NY, two years ago. After dialing 911, I waited for two hours for the police, who never showed. That was not the first time I was assaulted by blacks (a gang of nine or so robbed me of my Rolex in Fuerth, Germany in 1972).

    I live in a mixed black/latino neighborhood in Rochester. I like most of my black neighbors and I like to think they like me well enough. I feel I am being sincere when I say I do not dislike blacks in general.

    But Fred’s piece resonates with me because the bottom 10% or so of blacks are not just as dumb as a sack of rocks (that’s not my problem); they are impulsively violent. The biggest victims, of course, are the blacks around them. Black lives do matter; that’s the main reason why careless disrespectful self-absorbed impulsive sensual impressionable violent criminal black males are such a problem in this country. I will call them “niggers” because that’s what they call themselves. (They can most readily be identified from a distance by their odd sartorial custom of wearing their belts below their ani.)

    The “official” media and the government do not want to even discuss this issue, much less face it head-on. The fact that all the politicians’ “honest discussions about race” scrupulously avoid discussing this just shows that it is the 900-lb. gorilla in the room. But as Bob Marley sang, “But one day the bottom will drop out. Yes, one day the bottom will drop out.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    More Bob Marley: "and when the rain fall, it don't fall on one man's house."
    , @Cracker
    You had better get realistic.
  66. anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “Only a moron would display a confederate flag! The KKK took it on as a symbol of it’s organization.”

    You can’t let other people define your symbols for you, especially when they are on a mission to demonstrate false moral superiority, are driven by hate, and will never stop.

    It’s not about the Confederate Flag. More about how it’s getting time for a fall of the Soviet Union type of moment here. The system is no longer legitimate in a deep sense.

    Good article, Fred.

    Read More
  67. anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “Only a moron would display a confederate flag! The KKK took it on as a symbol of it’s organization. Who would want to be associated with the KKK? Hopefully no one!!”

    Seems you are confused as to the facts.

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/04/lew-rockwell/bristling-dixie/

    “…the KKK — a nationalist, nativist outfit if there ever was one — used the US flag exclusively in its days of power.

    The 1965 book by David M. Chalmers, Hooded Americanism: The First Century of the Ku Klux Klan, 1865-1965 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., 1965) was the definitive treatment at the time. It features many pictures of the Klan in operation. Not one shows a Confederate flag. Many feature the US flag.”

    So the question is, were you just ignorant of what you were talking about, or willfully ignorant?

    Read More
  68. anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    When it comes, the storm need not be violent or even a Soviet-style collapse.

    Passive-aggression at a national scale is a third option. Call it the Greek option. The Greeks were conquered by the Islamic Ottoman Turks during the 1400s until about 1830. It looks like they learned you don’t cooperate with the government by paying all your taxes, things like that. In the end it did come to violence, a lot of it apparently, but it was not successful until there was outside intervention; Lord Byron and all that; see the Battle of Navarino.

    Things got plenty unpleasant for the Greeks, they were just to small to stand up to the Ottoman government:

    “…The conquered land was parceled out to Ottoman nobles…

    …The Greek people were…. heavily taxed by the Ottoman Empire and this tax included a “tribute of children.” …

    …the young boys that were taken away and converted to Islam were made to serve in the Ottoman military. In addition, girls were taken in order to serve as odalisques in harems.”

    Read More
  69. @Hal Womack
    By family tradition, birth & upbringing I myself am a NAG [Normal, Alias "Gentile"] white Southerner. As a young boy living in Ft. Worth, I went a short way North to Whitesboro near the OK State line to visit my great grandmother, who lived on a small farm near there and was blind in one eye. When she was a young girl, General Sherman's troops had burnt down her house in Georgia during a blizzard, somehow causing thereby the loss of her eye, according to family lore. After the Yankee devastation, the Womacks migrated due West to our new Texas roost where I was visiting.

    I state my own background to indicate my particular personal interest in the white breed subset of our human race 7BAC ["Billion And Counting"]. All the previous articles by Fred Reed which I have read have been clever but this one's despicable.

    I'm all for toting up murder totals and publishing the details. For me and for any reasonable person, the first and by far most important thing I want to know about any chance-met stranger = the latter's status before the law: Be he [or] righteous or be he criminal? I will also mention that, technically, I am probably still the most famous shooter in the City of San Francisco, California, due to a highly publicized incident in October of 1993 which was also written up in the "Armed Citizen" column of the AMERICAN RIFLEMAN. The guy I shot in self-defense, to wide popular acclaim, was one Dallas Johnson, an armed colored stooge (with a white accomplice) set on by the DEA to spoil my public organizing effort with the late Terence McKenna. The narcs' plan worked.

    By that blazing word "law" above BTW I refer to such fundamental principles as serve justice only rather than to any of the wicked absurdities promulgated by JAR [JewAmerican Regime].

    I have had professional training at the highest level in world politics and am a long-time amateur master of the ancient oriental game of strategy known to the Koreans as _baduk_. A former highly effective disciple of the great Ho Chi Minh here in the USA for a dozen years during war time until our final victory in 1975, I began publishing on Usenet newsgroups in 1994. The Google Groups Page tonight shows [Posts: 10340] mentioning my name, down from 12K earlier, for some reason.

    Again I cite personal background to indicate that when I charge against the USGov roughly 30,000,000 [thirty million] murders worldwide since 1946, that accusation is _honte_*, as the Nips say.

    Now to return to the question of the day re American colors: The Jews on top ( <3% of the pop) hire the whites as secret police & like manner of assorted gun thugs to stand on the heads of the colored folk, who are now actually the national majority already, let alone the world immensity.

    The future for our white breed lies in integrating ourselves into our rainbow race as a whole and overthrowing JAT [Tyranny]. Julia Ward Howe, Mark Twain & Tim Leary will shake hands with Frederick Douglass, Satchmo, Bob Marley, Muhammad Ali, Diego Rivera, Rigoberta Menchu and Evo Morales --just to get the show started, as it were.

    Whereas the guilty Jews in their desperation at the collapse of their empire of MULL [MUrder, Looting & Lying] wish to stir the Merkin colors against each other, just as they have set Sunni against Shia in the Middle East. Yawanna try on that car bomb for size? Fred Reed is trying to lure us down that road of treason, madness and destruction.

    Which way will the reader choose?
    ...................................
    * [Honte is a Japanese go term meaning, the proper move. It is a solid play that leaves few or no weaknesses behind and has a followup.]
    http://senseis.xmp.net/?Honte

    Hal Womack used to be an acquaintance until his Maoism and negro luvin and white hating just became too much. He is an outcast in his own family, gordo in girth, and just a bizarre guy.

    HIs anti-semitism is such that he thinks the reason communism was bad in USSR was the Jews and only the Jews, and that Chairman Mao , being not Jewish, got it all straightened out.

    Hi Hal, nice to hear you bellow. And how is your welfare mooching going?
    SSI, or whatever, cuz he is so fat he cannot get to the job, not that he wants one.
    Joe Webb

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hal Womack
    Technical: My reply to Joe Webb is up already as post #84 on this thread.
  70. I read a post at another site about the flag controversy that went along the lines of “the cause the flag represented died 150 years ago. It’s time to move on.” But that cause has not died. The real cause was state rights vs. federal power. It was the cause then, and it’s still the cause now.

    While slowly whittling away our cultural guidelines, more and more government help, government interference, and government control is put in place to be an inefficient surrogate for that which was lost. The result has been a long steady transfer of power from the citizen to the government. Unsatisfied with that rate of transference, our government is engaged in manufacturing events to speed things up. Even to the point of financing insurrection, like that in Ferguson. But in Ferguson that financing didn’t come directly from the government, but from the people who own the government.

    And that’s the real reason there’s a never ending transfer of power to a central point. It enables the power structures at the top to control more power. This is a natural feature of evolution, an ever more complex cultural system linking larger and larger groups for a singular purpose. And power structures get to the top based on a singular attribute – the ability to accrue power.

    That’s what we’re really fighting against here, centralization of power; so that people still have some control over their lives. Unfortunately, most of the folks who will be fighting with you have been blinded by smoke and are operating under the delusion that this has something to do with race.

    http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Zebra_murders

    Read More
  71. @Flower
    Yes, that is an ongoing point when reading Fred. However, good advice from a Chinaman who has never left China is still good advice. Why Fred "fled" (and I don't agree with the word, but oh well) is probably Fred's business and nobody else's; but, due to reading between previous Fred lines, I suspect Fred became an Ex-Pat for the same reason a lot of men do really stupid shite: some woman and their own testosterone frenzied brain.

    I suspect Fred became an Ex-Pat for the same reason a lot of men do really stupid shite: some woman and their own testosterone frenzied brain.

    Some people claim that there’s a woman to blame….

    Read More
  72. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Gene Su
    "...It could explode. It really could. You might be surprised how many people out there think, “Bring it on.” Not a good idea, but we go that way.

    Tick Tick. Tick."

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win? (or better yet, who will lose?)

    In opportunity cost terms everyone will lose.

    Read More
  73. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Eustace Tilley (not)


    Ave, Gaius Quercus Africanus!

    I was beaten (not severely) by a gang of four blacks on the Driving Park Bridge in Rochester, NY, two years ago. After dialing 911, I waited for two hours for the police, who never showed. That was not the first time I was assaulted by blacks (a gang of nine or so robbed me of my Rolex in Fuerth, Germany in 1972).

    I live in a mixed black/latino neighborhood in Rochester. I like most of my black neighbors and I like to think they like me well enough. I feel I am being sincere when I say I do not dislike blacks in general.

    But Fred's piece resonates with me because the bottom 10% or so of blacks are not just as dumb as a sack of rocks (that's not my problem); they are impulsively violent. The biggest victims, of course, are the blacks around them. Black lives do matter; that's the main reason why careless disrespectful self-absorbed impulsive sensual impressionable violent criminal black males are such a problem in this country. I will call them "niggers" because that's what they call themselves. (They can most readily be identified from a distance by their odd sartorial custom of wearing their belts below their ani.)

    The "official" media and the government do not want to even discuss this issue, much less face it head-on. The fact that all the politicians' "honest discussions about race" scrupulously avoid discussing this just shows that it is the 900-lb. gorilla in the room. But as Bob Marley sang, "But one day the bottom will drop out. Yes, one day the bottom will drop out."

    More Bob Marley: “and when the rain fall, it don’t fall on one man’s house.”

    Read More
  74. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @quercus
    Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I've lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who's been beaten silly by black gangs. Has it happened somewhere before? Sure, and you provide us with some examples. I can provide you counter examples -- just recently a man in Baltimore, who became a celebrity of sorts after going to the local police station to report his mugging only to be told it was closed), had his bike stolen by a group of black teenagers, a fairly large group of them. Was he beaten, no. He had his bike stolen. Not nice, shouldn't happen, but he wasn't beaten. I heard him recount his experience on our locally produced public radio show.

    Whites are plenty violent and vicious -- just look at all the wars. Violence committed by the state is acceptable, but violence by individuals is "beyond the pale"? Get real.

    And we've never heard you criticize the ridiculous and unctuous influence that rabidly Zionist Jews have on American foreign policy. Those who level that criticism are correct. You also seem naive enough to believe the adage "Jews are smarter ....." Bullshit. I've never met or heard a Jew who I thought was smarter than I. The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation". That's the key to their power and influence, not their IQ.

    I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs.

    liar

    Read More
  75. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Pure and Easy
    This piece is so ridiculous. A white supremacist murders a group of innocents who welcomed him in a church. The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness. Yet the overall reaction in this essay and many of the comments are implying an impending race war. Unbelievable.

    The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness.

    Yes *they* acted admirably.

    However the media are taking the incident and using it as anti-white propaganda.

    Read More
  76. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    It’s possible this is all deliberate.

    A lot of people still don’t realize how totally the banking mafia has destroyed the US economy. It’s only held up by a thread of debt and that thread is only held up by the threat of military force and the ability to fund that threat is slowly leaking away like air from a balloon.

    One potential way out for TPTB is to try and incite enough conflict inside the US to allow them to declare martial law.

    It seems far-fetched but it might explain why the media has been trying so hard to incite anti-white racial violence over the last couple of years.

    Read More
  77. @Flower
    "when have American whites ever “exploded” or taken intelligent action against the Power Elite?"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_Wall_Street
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_sit-down_strike
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Normandy
    http://www.usmarshals.gov/history/civilian/1967c.htm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy (although the word "intelligent" may preclude this one)
    http://jurist.org/feature/2013/12/a-history-and-the-main-acts.php
    http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

    (more examples upon request)
    Just sayin'.

    Congratulations, you’ve opened my eyes to the intelligence of Fred’s comment section. Did you actually read past the first couple sentences- or did you even understand what I was saying? Do you understand who the power elite is? Do you know American history? I don’t think so.

    And I’m always astounded how people will put the dumbest interpretation on any comment and then go from there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Flower
    Hugh, I do not know what you mean, I only know what you say.
  78. Look, I like Fred. But people have been writing these kind of “Just wait till they push the silent majority TOO FAR – then look out” kind of columns ever since I started reading about politics – which is 30 years ago.

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They’ve taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear without any intelligent protest.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill
    Any minute now South African whites are going to get sick of being beaten up, robbed, and having their daughters raped constantly. Any minute now . . .
    , @Truth

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They’ve taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear
     
    Yeah, and Dennis Miller on Monday Night Football.
    , @leftist conservative

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They’ve taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear without any intelligent protest.
     
    Indeed. And why SHOULD there be any revolt? In order to understand why there will not likely be any revolt, you have to understand what homo sapiens is.

    Homo sapiens, wise man, thinking man, is a biological machine. Sociobiologist EO Wilson called mankind the primate that adopted the ant/termite/bee model of social organization. That is quite correct.

    Understand the origins of our species. We developed a big brain, and it helped us survive, compete and thrive.

    How do ants and bees tell each other of food sources? Ants lay a trail of pheromones to the food source. Bees dance a dance before the other bees, and the gyrations of that dance translate to a path to the nectar trove.

    Communication of ideas.

    Primitive, compared to our own, but the concept is the same.

    Our ancestor primates grew larger brains, and thus were able to transmit, understand, and re-transmit complex ideas--how to trap the herd, how to defend the tribe with traps, how to migrate to a new food source. Our tribal leaders were able to transmit complex ideas to the tribe.

    And further, the tribe developed social bonds through a culture. That culture bound the loyalty of each tribe member to the tribe. Rituals were developed to strengthen these bonds. Tribe members who threw off these cultural bonds did not in general reproduce as much as tribe members who internalized and accepted these cultural bonds. So mankind has logic and rationality, but within certain bounds. In general, adult tribe members accept the reigning culture of the tribe. Young homo sapiens--teens-- will of course test these bounds. That trait was for various reasons something that helped homo sapiens survive.

    But in general mankind evolved and became a hierarchical tribal species that handed down a bundle of ideology from the top of the tribe, and those ideas were accepted and internalized by the rest of the tribe.

    Homo sapiens is held together by ideas and ideology. That is in our nature.

    And it worked fine. At tribal and village and small city level. We took over the world. But nowadays, in nations of hundreds of millions of people, our innate tendency to be organized around ideology is being exploited by those at the top. It's called propaganda.

    Our culture has been shaped by the efforts of those at the top. The various subcultures of america have been domesticated, evolved, shaped by those at the top in order to serve their financial interests.

    Homo sapiens domesticated livestock. The first cow was different from the cattle in the dairy farms today. The first cow ever milked by man had little milk and would kill you if it could. Not today. Big udders and a gentle disposition. Mankind, over time, bred cattle to shape the species to serve man.

    Cultures and subcultures are the same way. They are quasi-organic entities that can be shaped and molded over time by insertion of ideas friendly to those at the top--plutocrats and big corporations.

    Those cultures and subcultures control us, at least to a great degree, in general.

    These domestication of the culture has been hastened to a great degree by technology--tv and newspaper and schools and radio and movies etc are channels through which ideology is transmitted. And these channels are to a great degree centralized. Thus, the overclass can insert its ideology more easily than if ideology transmission channels were decentralized. 100 years ago, 200 years, 300 years ago, ideology transmission channels were in general much more decentralized. Ideas were to some degree transmitted from local sources--the corner church, the farmers grange, the union hall, the men's club, etc.

    In the last 75 years or so, the overclass has domesticated the culture and subcultures via these centralized ideology transmission channels. And we have been balkanized and demonized and domesticated to a fare-thee-well. Self-loathing whites who gleefully prate about the end of the white race are domesticated creatures owned by the overclass. Likewise, "conservative" whites whose every other word is "socialist," same thing. Owned. Domestic cattle of the overclass.

    There is really only one source of possible help--the internet. As it grows more sophisticated, person to person transmission channels are becoming more dominant. Look at facebook. Compare news story transmission from 30 years ago to what goes on today. 30 years ago, a new story was published by the overclass in a newspaper, and it went right into your brain.

    Today, however, that story is shared on facebook, and the sharer gives his/her own opinion on it. And facebook friends comment. A different dynamic. One that may not bode well for the overclass control over the culture.

    Soon, no doubt, more and more person to person, mass communication channels will be opened up by the internet by means of wireless internet over large cities. This may well be a game changer. Completely decentralized.

    I do not do what I do for money. I do this to inject my ideas into the stream of ideas. The better to fight back against the overclass and help change the culture.

    Ah, sweet release. I have injected my ideas into your brain. Ah....
  79. @Eustace Tilley (not)


    Ave, Gaius Quercus Africanus!

    I was beaten (not severely) by a gang of four blacks on the Driving Park Bridge in Rochester, NY, two years ago. After dialing 911, I waited for two hours for the police, who never showed. That was not the first time I was assaulted by blacks (a gang of nine or so robbed me of my Rolex in Fuerth, Germany in 1972).

    I live in a mixed black/latino neighborhood in Rochester. I like most of my black neighbors and I like to think they like me well enough. I feel I am being sincere when I say I do not dislike blacks in general.

    But Fred's piece resonates with me because the bottom 10% or so of blacks are not just as dumb as a sack of rocks (that's not my problem); they are impulsively violent. The biggest victims, of course, are the blacks around them. Black lives do matter; that's the main reason why careless disrespectful self-absorbed impulsive sensual impressionable violent criminal black males are such a problem in this country. I will call them "niggers" because that's what they call themselves. (They can most readily be identified from a distance by their odd sartorial custom of wearing their belts below their ani.)

    The "official" media and the government do not want to even discuss this issue, much less face it head-on. The fact that all the politicians' "honest discussions about race" scrupulously avoid discussing this just shows that it is the 900-lb. gorilla in the room. But as Bob Marley sang, "But one day the bottom will drop out. Yes, one day the bottom will drop out."

    You had better get realistic.

    Read More
  80. Thank you, Sir: thank you from the bottom of my heart. You speak here for me. And I’m sure for many millions of our fellow Americans, too.

    Read More
  81. All of Mr. Reed’s valid complaints are exacerbated by US Jews, their media and their mega money.

    Yet the word “Jew” is never used in the article. The only safe way out of this ugly situation is to associate “Jews” with the problem. We must use the word “Jew” in our complaints.

    Read More
  82. Hey, hey, I got a little razz here [#71] from one “Joe Webb” (his real name), a retired Parole Officer from around San Mateo in northern California. This just goes to show how low the Jews are scraping the bottom of the barrel: hiring the Incest Twinz Jeb & Hillary, sinking down even to wee Joe, too.

    [MORE]

    Me, I started as a pump jockey for Texaco in Ft. Worth in 1959 for 42 cents an hour, began hacking in NYC in 1971, was a San Francisco MUNI operator until 1993, as previously noted, and after that DEA intervention resumed hacking for SF Yellow Cab until a few years ago when I retired on my extremely modest pension from Social Security. If Joe has ever done an honest day’s work in his whole life, I have yet to hear about it and I’ve spent quite a bit of time with him back when. Curious, too, that he wants to bring up family matters; has he made up with his ex? Does anyone else care about this at all?

    Joe Webb follows the standard hazbarat technique of trying to turn a political discussion into a personal quarrel. Anyone who cares to review the 10K+ mentions of my name on the Google Groups Page since 1994 can find this degraded hecklers style displayed at great length already. The motive quite obvious, namely, when the Yid or his jootool tries to defend mass murder of NAGs, then accuse the prosecutor of using too much garlic.

    In my original comment [#40] I wrote:
    {Again I cite personal background to indicate that when I charge against the USGov roughly 30,000,000 [thirty million] murders worldwide since 1946, that accusation is _honte_*, as the Nips say.}
    About this major proposition, Joe has zippo to say, he seeks only to distract the discussion by accusing me of being even fatter than Buddha, Santa Claus, Henry VIII or Johann Sebastian Bach. Old Joe is rather vain about his looks and has the intellectual depth of a teacup. I try to love him anyway, allee samee other criminal dregs of humanity like Netanyahu & Feinstein.

    “Anti-semitism” such a lame refrain, as I have so often exposed already in print. I am long time preaching the update from Augustine of Hippo that we all 7BAC should love the criminal like Joe & his NaZionist employers and hate the crime, like World Jewry’s brazen massacre of 500+ children in the Seven Week Slaughter a year ago now, which I tagged as GM’14.

    The distinction between destructive JewBolshevism in Russia vs genuine national revolutionary movements in China & Vietnam under the “Communist” label is pretty original with me AFAIK and deserves further elaboration in due time.

    Joe W. & the rest of the hazbaratz like the whole U.S. Senate utterly without shame, of course. Bymeby, I daresay, we the righteous of Earth will hunt them all down and duly call them to account for their misdeeds.

    A parthian challenge here for JW = In my first piece I mentioned by name 10 of my heroes. Will Joe dare to tell us whom he likes? Generally Joe’s ilk are quite loath to respond on this point, realizing that Big Names regard as odious taint open contact with their own yapping selves.

    Meanwhile I would fain encourage the reader on how we the NAG immensity can best overthrow JAT and then properly stomp on its bloody bugs like Adelson, Haim Saban & even scurrrying Joe.

    Read More
  83. @jim sweeney
    The obvious, to me anyway, answer for is for Christian priest, ministers, reverends and other religious like Rabbis, to simply resign their civil authority to legally marry people. Let ALL marriages per se be performed at the local courts or some civil bureau. Then, religious MARRIED couples can go to their particular church/minister and have him/her perform a religious, celebratory service of their marriage. This is similar to the civil/religious practice in much of the world. Churches will then EXERCISE their religious rules of one man & one woman to which none may object. Parishoners only please and, if you're a gay couple, we don't exercise that way. I don't see any possible legal objection to that approach.

    It gets the churches out of marriage itself which, as we know, is just a contract. It keeps them in weddings however, especially religious weddings. It perfectly separates church from state and who can argue with that?

    I've argued this on my own site and, so far, nobody has even taken a shot at it.

    Try so it can be improved - thanks.

    Actually, what you are suggesting is exactly how it is done in Russia, a country our government keeps on threatening every day with conflict…

    Read More
  84. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Not sure about the rest of what you wrote, but I'll certainly agree about one thing: Jews and Northeastern whites (the modern Puritans) will never leave Southern whites (and any other white that doesn't agree with them) alone. They hate you as much as you hate them. What's more, they fear you. They literally want to destroy you.

    And you know what? They're winning. They're better organized and more motivated. (After all, fear is the best motivator.) They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis. If possible, they'd love to see you genetically disappear.

    For the moment, their plan is working pretty well. In another generation or two, the game could be over for the most part.

    I'm on your side, but the trend is against you.

    I’m sure you know “northeastern whites” doesn’t apply to Northern Maine. We love all of our patriotic brothers.

    Read More
  85. @Corvinus
    "We now see forced hiring of the incompetent as a right, endless accounts of blacks destroying shopping malls, burning cities, brutally attacking whites in gangs, and the giving to blacks of anything they want because they are black."

    Hyper-ramped rhetoric, folks.

    "At some point, the Saxon will begin to hate."

    Those Southrons who cling on to the Confederate flag and pre-Civil War life already hate.

    "They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis."

    The gummint? Really?

    "But there presence may push more Hispanic families – ones not quite so decent – to move into your neighborhood. Over time, the neighborhood turns into a Barrio because of that first, nice family."

    If a family regardless of race or ethnic background makes middle to upper-middle class money, they are generally going to keep the neighborhood looking like their neighbors. So your example doesn't cut it here.

    "As Californian, it’s quite apparent even to me, that the Feds are on a jihad against Johnny Reb and Southern Culture in general. They want to eradicate part of our history, heritage and culture."

    Against Johnny Reb, assuredly. Southern Culture? You have your guns and whiskey. Even Yankees love those two things!

    "They are so terrified of losing anything they’ll avert their gaze if they see a white man being brutally beaten or white woman raped by mob of negroes."

    With cell phones, people who see those types of crimes call the police.

    "And most whites comply like the wussies they are."

    Please define "white".

    "America is governed by two corporate controlled parties in which any populist candidate gets stomped on."

    Why don't you run for office rather than run your mouth? See, that's the problem with a lot of folks here. All talk, no action. Work to gain control of local politics, then work up the ladder.

    Please define “white”.

    Something beside your tired ass.

    Read More
  86. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Dahlia
    They spent, what?, may be 5 seconds mourning those 9 souls?

    And that profound Christian witness about forgiveness given by the families... Except for the Amish schoolhouse slaughter, I've never heard of it so powerfully demonstrated. And this time we got to see it with our own eyes.

    I really believed at the time that there would be all this focus on victims, the Christian woman who fearfully, but prayerfully, followed Dylann Roof which lead to his capture, their families, and how well Charleston came together.
    I never expected anything less from Charleston. Graceful as always and now the nation would see how wonderful all these people were in adversity. I used to live there and even fearfully looked up if any of my old friends and co-workers were among the dead.

    Naive. Almost completely ignored. The last article I read that even was about them before changing the subject to the southern white menace was from a Jewish perspective that forgiveness like this was wrong (Christianity is unique and confounding in this, but show some respect, please.) One shining spot was a long article about African-American Christianity and its beginnings.

    It just seems more an excuse to flay southern whites. 95% of the energy has gone to them versus the murdered victims by my reckoning.

    I made a post yesterday about the very same thing. The name of the killer will always be remembered and connected with the fall of the Confederate Flag. The victims will soon be forgotten by most. The Governor used those people as a political stepping stone and their own people disgraced them by Using them to push and achieve Their own agenda.
    He said he wanted to start a race war. They fell for hook and line and ran with it. He won. His name is nation wide along with what He done and the fall out. He has done what he set out to do.
    There is division all across the nation.
    You would have thought that there would had been unity in Charleston and maybe talk of a memorial for the victims.

    Read More
  87. @Sunbeam
    "This piece is so ridiculous. A white supremacist murders a group of innocents who welcomed him in a church."

    I'd be willing to bet that most days since this incident that the 14% or so of America that is black, has beaten his body count with black on white murders. Heck there is an outside chance they beat it that day (but I dunno Sunday is kinda slow after the AM hours).

    Just like it has been for a long, long time. Care to address this statistic? It exists. What do you have to say about it?

    "The community and the specific family members of the victims somehow find forgiveness."

    You mean the community and the family members in question got microphones and camera shoved in their faces, and they recited the mantra. Just like everyone does when in a situation like this.

    "Yet the overall reaction in this essay and many of the comments are implying an impending race war. Unbelievable."

    Could happen. I tend to think that the US really doesn't have a whole lot going for us right now. A good dose of sudden "austerity" is going to make for a lot of unhappy campers. If the money isn't there for the "hologram" (as Joe Bageant put it), or I guess you could say subsidized sofas and cable tv... well lots could happen. These (and I'm not addressing any particular ethnic group) people just aren't the types that can handle this sort of thing. And we have so many fracture points waiting to happen.

    But otherwise we aren't going to see a race war. Brazil is where we are headed. Barring some sudden shock (which could easily happen).

    Thanks for reaffirming my initial comment. You sound like a certain manifesto that was written by someone now in a SC jail.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sunbeam
    Do you doubt the statistics? Or is that a little abstract?

    What is your world view anyway? You seem to think that there are tons of white people running around stalking black people, just waiting for a chance to kill them.

    When actually the bulk of the violence swings the other way. Only thing is it is a lot more random and arbitrary for the most part. And boring. A guy beaten up in Philadelphia. Another one shot in Memphis. An old lady knocked down and kicked in yet another city.

    But there is no grand plan, nothing for the media to spin a story about. It's just too... boring.

    But it happens every day. Heck, it probably happened at least three or four times since I posted.

    Do you have anything to say to that?
    , @silviosilver
    The manifesto was broadly accurate. Whites really are being screwed over.
  88. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Priss Factor
    The Tribe controls America.

    The Tribe tells whites that their central duty is to

    1. Kiss Jewish butt

    2. Kiss homo butt

    3. Kiss mulatto butt

    And most whites comply like the wussies they are.

    Don’t forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??

    Read More
    • Replies: @leftist conservative

    Don’t forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??

     

    I can plow a field all day long
    I can catch catfish from dusk 'til dawn
    We make our own whiskey and our own smoke, too
    Ain't too many things these ole boys can't do
    We grow good ole tomatoes and homemade wine
    And a country boy can survive
    Country folks can survive
    , @Anon
    I hear ya.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cQNkIrg-Tk
    , @Anonymous
    i really don't believe that for one second. you hunt and fish with commercial equipment and drive to the wilderness.

    It's always someone elses fault. Lost the Civil War? Damn Yankees! Yeah, whatever. You still lost. Now you're crying about a flag.

    I do like the flag though- Scottish Cross.
  89. @Pure and Easy
    Thanks for reaffirming my initial comment. You sound like a certain manifesto that was written by someone now in a SC jail.

    Do you doubt the statistics? Or is that a little abstract?

    What is your world view anyway? You seem to think that there are tons of white people running around stalking black people, just waiting for a chance to kill them.

    When actually the bulk of the violence swings the other way. Only thing is it is a lot more random and arbitrary for the most part. And boring. A guy beaten up in Philadelphia. Another one shot in Memphis. An old lady knocked down and kicked in yet another city.

    But there is no grand plan, nothing for the media to spin a story about. It’s just too… boring.

    But it happens every day. Heck, it probably happened at least three or four times since I posted.

    Do you have anything to say to that?

    Read More
  90. @Anonymous
    Don't forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??

    Don’t forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??

    I can plow a field all day long
    I can catch catfish from dusk ’til dawn
    We make our own whiskey and our own smoke, too
    Ain’t too many things these ole boys can’t do
    We grow good ole tomatoes and homemade wine
    And a country boy can survive
    Country folks can survive

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dahlia
    And we can skin a buck
    We can run a trotline
    And a country boy can survive
    Country folks can survive!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cQNkIrg-Tk

    , @Curle
    That's all well and good but it would be better if they could form high tech firms that earn sufficient profits to buy a national TV network or group of newspapers to compete with the NY Times. Otherwise, the other guys who don't know how to fish but do know how to make money will continue to define the culture.

    The South will not win a culture war with nostalgia.
  91. @joe webb
    Hal Womack used to be an acquaintance until his Maoism and negro luvin and white hating just became too much. He is an outcast in his own family, gordo in girth, and just a bizarre guy.

    HIs anti-semitism is such that he thinks the reason communism was bad in USSR was the Jews and only the Jews, and that Chairman Mao , being not Jewish, got it all straightened out.

    Hi Hal, nice to hear you bellow. And how is your welfare mooching going?
    SSI, or whatever, cuz he is so fat he cannot get to the job, not that he wants one.
    Joe Webb

    Technical: My reply to Joe Webb is up already as post #84 on this thread.

    Read More
  92. @Honesthughgrant
    Congratulations, you've opened my eyes to the intelligence of Fred's comment section. Did you actually read past the first couple sentences- or did you even understand what I was saying? Do you understand who the power elite is? Do you know American history? I don't think so.

    And I'm always astounded how people will put the dumbest interpretation on any comment and then go from there.

    Hugh, I do not know what you mean, I only know what you say.

    Read More
  93. @Hibernian
    Southerners are disproportionately represented in the Army and the Marine Corps. I'm not sure about the other services. Southern White Christian clergy tend to celebrate the military. On the other hand, the best voices against warmongering among Congressional Republicans since about 2005 have been Paul of Texas, Duncan of Tennessee, Paul of Kentucky, Jones of North Carolina, and Hostettler of southern Indiana.

    Ron Paul is not from Texas. Have you heard the man talk? Pittsburgh.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hibernian
    I'm aware he grew up in PA near Pittsburgh. He sounds more Texas than Pittsburgh to me. (Western NY and PA are culturally Midwestern and I speak with a Midwestern accent myself. As far as Texas is concerned, admittedly I've never even visited there.) He's lived in TX for many years and has been repeatedly reelected to the House by Texans. Certainly he's no Northeastern liberal or moderate.
  94. @Flower
    "when have American whites ever “exploded” or taken intelligent action against the Power Elite?"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_Wall_Street
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_sit-down_strike
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Normandy
    http://www.usmarshals.gov/history/civilian/1967c.htm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy (although the word "intelligent" may preclude this one)
    http://jurist.org/feature/2013/12/a-history-and-the-main-acts.php
    http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

    (more examples upon request)
    Just sayin'.

    You are deluded to an amazing degree.

    Read More
  95. @Honesthughgrant
    Look, I like Fred. But people have been writing these kind of "Just wait till they push the silent majority TOO FAR - then look out" kind of columns ever since I started reading about politics - which is 30 years ago.

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They've taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear without any intelligent protest.

    Any minute now South African whites are going to get sick of being beaten up, robbed, and having their daughters raped constantly. Any minute now . . .

    Read More
  96. @leftist conservative

    Don’t forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??

     

    I can plow a field all day long
    I can catch catfish from dusk 'til dawn
    We make our own whiskey and our own smoke, too
    Ain't too many things these ole boys can't do
    We grow good ole tomatoes and homemade wine
    And a country boy can survive
    Country folks can survive

    And we can skin a buck
    We can run a trotline
    And a country boy can survive
    Country folks can survive!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wyrd
    This is a coalition to ban coalitions
    I ain't a politician but I've got views
    Some folks want to ban cars
    Some want to get rid of Fender guitars

    Why don't you do your thing
    And we do our thing too?
    Now they want to take my cigarettes
    And all my good whiskey

    And these damn coalitions
    They're after you and me
    They want to get rid of my forty fours
    And all the R rated films

    If they only knew how much
    We'd all love to get rid of them
    And this is a coalition to ban coalitions
    The views of a musician, yeah, I've got some

    Some folks want to ban cars
    Some want to get rid of electric guitars
    Why can't everybody else
    Leave everybody else alone?

    Now the latest thing they want
    To stomp out is violence on TV
    And the worst of all
    Is that Oscar winning rabbit Bugs Bunny

    Farewell, Foghorn Leghorn
    So long Yosemite Sam
    They're messing with our heroes
    And we got to stop them now

    And this is a coalition to ban coalitions

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrXnDbOpxU4
  97. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Not sure about the rest of what you wrote, but I'll certainly agree about one thing: Jews and Northeastern whites (the modern Puritans) will never leave Southern whites (and any other white that doesn't agree with them) alone. They hate you as much as you hate them. What's more, they fear you. They literally want to destroy you.

    And you know what? They're winning. They're better organized and more motivated. (After all, fear is the best motivator.) They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis. If possible, they'd love to see you genetically disappear.

    For the moment, their plan is working pretty well. In another generation or two, the game could be over for the most part.

    I'm on your side, but the trend is against you.

    Please keep my religion out of your mouth I in now way want anything to change in this country other than all the bs that’s going on now. I support your right as a Christian but I hope you are also not a bigot and support my right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jay
    You don't seem to have inherited the usual Jewish facility with verbal expression. Nevertheless, if your reading comprehension is moderately functional, you could look at the work of Dr. Kevin McDonald to learn why some believe that the Jewish influence in the U.S. has not been benign. Start with "The Culture of Critique." Also the website "The Occidental Observer."
  98. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Not sure about the rest of what you wrote, but I'll certainly agree about one thing: Jews and Northeastern whites (the modern Puritans) will never leave Southern whites (and any other white that doesn't agree with them) alone. They hate you as much as you hate them. What's more, they fear you. They literally want to destroy you.

    And you know what? They're winning. They're better organized and more motivated. (After all, fear is the best motivator.) They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis. If possible, they'd love to see you genetically disappear.

    For the moment, their plan is working pretty well. In another generation or two, the game could be over for the most part.

    I'm on your side, but the trend is against you.

    You say the issue is organization citizen, but the civil war proved that on prompting the south organized significantly quicker than the North. The true issue was availability of arms and production of ammo. The North was out maneuvered in nearly every battle, took many more losses than the south, Lee outwitted every Union general posed. The victory of the North was thanks to numbers and production of ammunition and goods. Don’t get organization and supply confused.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hibernian
    Confederate politicians argued among themselves about States' Rights during the War. That was a factor in the Southern defeat. Also, Joshua chamberlain of Maine was a tactical genius at Gettysburg.
  99. @Honesthughgrant
    Look, I like Fred. But people have been writing these kind of "Just wait till they push the silent majority TOO FAR - then look out" kind of columns ever since I started reading about politics - which is 30 years ago.

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They've taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear without any intelligent protest.

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They’ve taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear

    Yeah, and Dennis Miller on Monday Night Football.

    Read More
  100. @Corvinus
    "We now see forced hiring of the incompetent as a right, endless accounts of blacks destroying shopping malls, burning cities, brutally attacking whites in gangs, and the giving to blacks of anything they want because they are black."

    Hyper-ramped rhetoric, folks.

    "At some point, the Saxon will begin to hate."

    Those Southrons who cling on to the Confederate flag and pre-Civil War life already hate.

    "They want to utterly destroy your culture, demoralize you and force you to deal with blacks and Hispanics on a daily basis."

    The gummint? Really?

    "But there presence may push more Hispanic families – ones not quite so decent – to move into your neighborhood. Over time, the neighborhood turns into a Barrio because of that first, nice family."

    If a family regardless of race or ethnic background makes middle to upper-middle class money, they are generally going to keep the neighborhood looking like their neighbors. So your example doesn't cut it here.

    "As Californian, it’s quite apparent even to me, that the Feds are on a jihad against Johnny Reb and Southern Culture in general. They want to eradicate part of our history, heritage and culture."

    Against Johnny Reb, assuredly. Southern Culture? You have your guns and whiskey. Even Yankees love those two things!

    "They are so terrified of losing anything they’ll avert their gaze if they see a white man being brutally beaten or white woman raped by mob of negroes."

    With cell phones, people who see those types of crimes call the police.

    "And most whites comply like the wussies they are."

    Please define "white".

    "America is governed by two corporate controlled parties in which any populist candidate gets stomped on."

    Why don't you run for office rather than run your mouth? See, that's the problem with a lot of folks here. All talk, no action. Work to gain control of local politics, then work up the ladder.

    If a family regardless of race or ethnic background makes middle to upper-middle class money, they are generally going to keep the neighborhood looking like their neighbors. So your example doesn’t cut it here.

    No, they make the neighborhood a more comfortable place for lower income blacks to visit. Crime goes up as the lower income blacks find things worth stealing and whites begin to flee creating a death spiral for home values. Sailer has been saying something to this effect for years. The fact that your middle class black neighbors will be victims as well doesn’t alleviate the predictability of the process nor the damage done to the value of your home/asset.

    Read More
  101. @leftist conservative

    Don’t forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??

     

    I can plow a field all day long
    I can catch catfish from dusk 'til dawn
    We make our own whiskey and our own smoke, too
    Ain't too many things these ole boys can't do
    We grow good ole tomatoes and homemade wine
    And a country boy can survive
    Country folks can survive

    That’s all well and good but it would be better if they could form high tech firms that earn sufficient profits to buy a national TV network or group of newspapers to compete with the NY Times. Otherwise, the other guys who don’t know how to fish but do know how to make money will continue to define the culture.

    The South will not win a culture war with nostalgia.

    Read More
  102. @Dahlia
    And we can skin a buck
    We can run a trotline
    And a country boy can survive
    Country folks can survive!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cQNkIrg-Tk

    This is a coalition to ban coalitions
    I ain’t a politician but I’ve got views
    Some folks want to ban cars
    Some want to get rid of Fender guitars

    Why don’t you do your thing
    And we do our thing too?
    Now they want to take my cigarettes
    And all my good whiskey

    And these damn coalitions
    They’re after you and me
    They want to get rid of my forty fours
    And all the R rated films

    If they only knew how much
    We’d all love to get rid of them
    And this is a coalition to ban coalitions
    The views of a musician, yeah, I’ve got some

    Some folks want to ban cars
    Some want to get rid of electric guitars
    Why can’t everybody else
    Leave everybody else alone?

    Now the latest thing they want
    To stomp out is violence on TV
    And the worst of all
    Is that Oscar winning rabbit Bugs Bunny

    Farewell, Foghorn Leghorn
    So long Yosemite Sam
    They’re messing with our heroes
    And we got to stop them now

    And this is a coalition to ban coalitions

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dahlia
    Ha ha! I'm actually not the biggest Hank Williams Jr. fan; he's a redneck's redneck.
    I almost didn't post the "Country Boys Can Survive" video because as great a song as it is, his best, he is way too thug acting in it for my taste. But I love that song (who doesn't?)

    My tastes run more toward Waylon Jennings, John Anderson, Willie Nelson, Johnny Cash, etc.

    Waylon, of course, is King. John Anderson, though, was more acquainted with being on the receiving end of pain, lacking Waylon's sometimes cockiness. John's songs (Bend it Until it Breaks, When it Comes to you) thus are even more soulful, which didn't seem possible.

  103. @Pure and Easy
    Thanks for reaffirming my initial comment. You sound like a certain manifesto that was written by someone now in a SC jail.

    The manifesto was broadly accurate. Whites really are being screwed over.

    Read More
  104. Combine this article-(good article at that) with some old-time advice………no…STRONG INSTRUCTION……..from Thomas Jefferson. In one of his many letters written to Abigail Adams–Jefferson clearly states that ….I’ll try to quote from memory…….Regarding those whom you have elected to represent you in Congress and in government “to faithfully delegate on the peoples behalf, ” if they delegate UN-faithfully on the people’s behalf,(being unfaithful to the people) against the people–”they should be removed from office immediately, and new representatives elected.”—Forgive me for the partial memory…(without looking it up)—As stated in the article—-Washington D.C. and the rest of all the government agencies, departments, etc—-have usurped the POWER from the people——-and we have a duty to address this mountain of corruption and soft-tyranny that has crept in, and is destroying us. The news media have sold their souls—-political correctness (this evil doctrine)—is destroying our speech and attacking Christianity (which is it’s aim)—-homosexual marriage—–illegals pouring over the border—bringing with them, knowingly and unknowingly, enemies and terrorists. Oh yea…….I too, believe that there are millions of us that see things as they are. Clearly.

    Read More
  105. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    …..

    Storm clouds are building on the distant horizon. Lightning strikes and the sound of rolling thunder can be heard from the highest mountains through the deepest valleys.

    Men of resolute nature forming a sound plan of action need to gather and unite in the battle set before them……

    Through the union of ink to common white parchment, penned through the determination and sacrifice of our founding fathers paid for by the blood of patriots, a plan was developed for the birth of a new Nation. This plan, The United States Constitution has sewn together the fabric of the greatest Nation this world has ever seen.

    “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    Today through the deceit of those in power, ignoring the voice of “We the People” this fabric is in danger.

    “If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.”
 ~Samuel Adams~

    We the people, we as Americans, We as Patriots need to draw a line in the sand and say enough is enough. We the People will not retreat, We the People will not fly the white flag. We the People will dig in and protect that which was and has been fought for, Freedom, The Constitution of the United States.

    The time is now….

    Action of experienced patriots are needed now in order to protect this Nation and its way of life that was set forth when the corner stone of these United States was formed.

    “Now more than ever before, the people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness and corruption. If it be intelligent, brave and pure, it is because the people demand these high qualities to represent them in the national legislature…. If the next centennial does not find us a great nation … it will be because those who represent the enterprise, the culture, and the morality of the nation do not aid in controlling the political forces.”


    —-James Garfield, the twentieth president of the United States, 1877

    Years from now, how will you look back to this period of time? Will you look back and say I had the opportunity to act but did nothing? Or will you be one who took up the responsibility? The responsibility to act and peacefully change the course of this Nation…..

    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
    –Thomas Jefferson

    “Life’s greatest achievement is to have preserved the lives and freedoms of others, preferably through peace but by force if necessary”

    The storm is coming…Lightning has struck…

    Read More
  106. @Honesthughgrant
    Look, I like Fred. But people have been writing these kind of "Just wait till they push the silent majority TOO FAR - then look out" kind of columns ever since I started reading about politics - which is 30 years ago.

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They've taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear without any intelligent protest.

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They’ve taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear without any intelligent protest.

    Indeed. And why SHOULD there be any revolt? In order to understand why there will not likely be any revolt, you have to understand what homo sapiens is.

    Homo sapiens, wise man, thinking man, is a biological machine. Sociobiologist EO Wilson called mankind the primate that adopted the ant/termite/bee model of social organization. That is quite correct.

    Understand the origins of our species. We developed a big brain, and it helped us survive, compete and thrive.

    How do ants and bees tell each other of food sources? Ants lay a trail of pheromones to the food source. Bees dance a dance before the other bees, and the gyrations of that dance translate to a path to the nectar trove.

    Communication of ideas.

    Primitive, compared to our own, but the concept is the same.

    Our ancestor primates grew larger brains, and thus were able to transmit, understand, and re-transmit complex ideas–how to trap the herd, how to defend the tribe with traps, how to migrate to a new food source. Our tribal leaders were able to transmit complex ideas to the tribe.

    And further, the tribe developed social bonds through a culture. That culture bound the loyalty of each tribe member to the tribe. Rituals were developed to strengthen these bonds. Tribe members who threw off these cultural bonds did not in general reproduce as much as tribe members who internalized and accepted these cultural bonds. So mankind has logic and rationality, but within certain bounds. In general, adult tribe members accept the reigning culture of the tribe. Young homo sapiens–teens– will of course test these bounds. That trait was for various reasons something that helped homo sapiens survive.

    But in general mankind evolved and became a hierarchical tribal species that handed down a bundle of ideology from the top of the tribe, and those ideas were accepted and internalized by the rest of the tribe.

    Homo sapiens is held together by ideas and ideology. That is in our nature.

    And it worked fine. At tribal and village and small city level. We took over the world. But nowadays, in nations of hundreds of millions of people, our innate tendency to be organized around ideology is being exploited by those at the top. It’s called propaganda.

    Our culture has been shaped by the efforts of those at the top. The various subcultures of america have been domesticated, evolved, shaped by those at the top in order to serve their financial interests.

    Homo sapiens domesticated livestock. The first cow was different from the cattle in the dairy farms today. The first cow ever milked by man had little milk and would kill you if it could. Not today. Big udders and a gentle disposition. Mankind, over time, bred cattle to shape the species to serve man.

    Cultures and subcultures are the same way. They are quasi-organic entities that can be shaped and molded over time by insertion of ideas friendly to those at the top–plutocrats and big corporations.

    Those cultures and subcultures control us, at least to a great degree, in general.

    These domestication of the culture has been hastened to a great degree by technology–tv and newspaper and schools and radio and movies etc are channels through which ideology is transmitted. And these channels are to a great degree centralized. Thus, the overclass can insert its ideology more easily than if ideology transmission channels were decentralized. 100 years ago, 200 years, 300 years ago, ideology transmission channels were in general much more decentralized. Ideas were to some degree transmitted from local sources–the corner church, the farmers grange, the union hall, the men’s club, etc.

    In the last 75 years or so, the overclass has domesticated the culture and subcultures via these centralized ideology transmission channels. And we have been balkanized and demonized and domesticated to a fare-thee-well. Self-loathing whites who gleefully prate about the end of the white race are domesticated creatures owned by the overclass. Likewise, “conservative” whites whose every other word is “socialist,” same thing. Owned. Domestic cattle of the overclass.

    There is really only one source of possible help–the internet. As it grows more sophisticated, person to person transmission channels are becoming more dominant. Look at facebook. Compare news story transmission from 30 years ago to what goes on today. 30 years ago, a new story was published by the overclass in a newspaper, and it went right into your brain.

    Today, however, that story is shared on facebook, and the sharer gives his/her own opinion on it. And facebook friends comment. A different dynamic. One that may not bode well for the overclass control over the culture.

    Soon, no doubt, more and more person to person, mass communication channels will be opened up by the internet by means of wireless internet over large cities. This may well be a game changer. Completely decentralized.

    I do not do what I do for money. I do this to inject my ideas into the stream of ideas. The better to fight back against the overclass and help change the culture.

    Ah, sweet release. I have injected my ideas into your brain. Ah….

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    leftist conservative...."But in general mankind evolved and became a hierarchical tribal species that handed down a bundle of ideology from the top of the tribe, and those ideas were accepted and internalized by the rest of the tribe.

    Homo sapiens is held together by ideas and ideology. That is in our nature."

    That is a mouthful. There is definitely something in it but let me suggest first, that 'ideas and ideology' cannot defeat impulses from the genes. Second, powerful impulses like sex and hunger cannot be defeated at all, although they can be a tiny bit channeled.

    Thirdly, "Ideas" have not generally had much of a role until relatively recently meaning the last couple thousand years. The primal horde, village agriculture, etc. got along just fine without Ideas, or ideologies. Things were just the way they were and appeared totally natural.

    Fourth, 'natural' acceptance of social life, dominated by a Big Man, dynastic relations, and social forms consistent with the "natural aristocracy" and inequality in general did not need any
    'ideas.'

    Fifth, Religion enters and Big Ideas.

    Then Ideas ultimately begin to address social life, for good and ill.
    ---------------
    Today, the Big Ideas are virtually all Liberal Ideas. Conservatives have had few Ideas. Ideas are usually untethered to empirical reality...they are empty.

    So, the natural impulses today contradict liberal big Ideas, egalitarian ideas of every type.

    The natural impulses of Man as Social (not Political) Animal, are race/group/family affiliative impulses. They spontaneously appear despite Bad Liberal Ideas. However, it takes a while for Whites, especially smart Whites, to overcome their altruistic impulses and perceive social and individual reality. Say, the average age for Whites who bother with ideas at all, to come to their senses or natural impulses, is 35 or 40.

    So, this is how the counter-revolution will begin, despite the lies of the jews and liberals, etc.
    Also, keeping alive the "scientific racism" ( as the anti-fas call it ) is very important, and that is what White Nationalists are basically doing.

    So reality based ideas help out the natural process of discarding Bad Ideas which conflict with perceived and felt social and racial reality, as well as individual reality as in, for example, awakening to the fact that you may have married the wrong person.

    ----------- Point: Ideology cannot conquer Reality, but it can influence it. We are lucky to be living in a time when the Bad Ideas are like fat burning in the fire of counter-revolution.

    Joe Webb

  107. “Something beside your tired ass.”

    So, Wyrd, you really have no definition for “white”, huh?

    “No, they make the neighborhood a more comfortable place for lower income blacks to visit.”

    No, they make the neighborhood a more comfortable place for ANYONE to visit. See, I live in a neighborhood with middle/upper class whites, Hispanics, blacks, Jews, and Eastern Europeans. When my neighbors have gatherings, their relatives (gasp) are generally of the same income bracket. Moreover, if their “low income” family members/friends do show up, (gasp) they may a little loud, but there is no “knock out game” or “roving gang rapists”.

    “Crime goes up as the lower income blacks find things worth stealing and whites begin to flee creating a death spiral for home values.”

    You are just generalizing.

    “The fact that your middle class black neighbors will be victims as well doesn’t alleviate the predictability of the process nor the damage done to the value of your home/asset.”

    Again, merely generalizing. Anything else of actual substance to add?

    “The storm is coming…Lightning has struck…”

    Ok, the Coming Storm, when are YOU actually going to do something about it rather than provide hot air?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stealth

    When my neighbors have gatherings, their relatives (gasp) are generally of the same income bracket. Moreover, if their “low income” family members/friends do show up, (gasp) they may a little loud, but there is no “knock out game” or “roving gang rapists”.
     
    You're lucky. That's not how it goes everywhere. Twenty years ago, no one got shot in my small town subdivision. It's been infrequent and intra-racial so far, but it never happened before nice black families started moving in. There have been two shootings since I moved in a couple of years ago. That's just how it is.

    I have some experience with the black middle class and the Talented Tenth. Young black men from all background are relentlessly pressured to engage in anti-social behavior, and too many of them succumb. By the time it's all over with, a surprising number of them have criminal records and are being garnished for child support.

  108. If you have not read Robert Putnam’s study Diversity and Community in the 21st Century, 2006, I urge you to do so.

    The study documents the decline of Trust in diverse communities, and the continuing high trust levels in homogenous communities in the US. Different races increasingly do not trust one-another, but more importantly, people of the same race do not trust one-another, especially whites.

    One of the reasons for our pathology (white) of apathy and relative cowardice with regard to organizing to resist the Revolution of Color and racial equality is that we do not trust one-another. Organizing requires mutual trust. The Jews and the liberals and the blacks have eroded white solidarity.
    Joe Webb

    Read More
  109. “Something beside your tired ass.”

    So, Wyrd, you really have no definition for “white”, huh?

    It’s a white thing, you wouldn’t understand.

    Read More
  110. The only thing that can stop angry Whites are other angry Whites. However, with White homelands in Europe now being flooded with mud, White people aren’t buying that phony racism label any more. The Storm has begun and the crescendo will continue to rise and no one can stop it now.
    Nothing can ever happen until it does. The dullard has not the imagination to see the possibilities that arise from different conditions. The Stupid have an extra helping of Continuity Bias the Wrong Assumption that tomorrow will be like today.
    America would not even exist if White people were unwilling to overthrow Bad Government. This irrational belief or perhaps deluded hope that White people do not have a survival instinct will cause Rivers of Non-White mud blood to flow like a river.
    Cry me a River, Bitch. The Time has Come. No one can stop the Wheel of Time and Destiny calls the Men of the West to destroy the Satanic swine and their Orc armies. Its not just coming, its already started.

    Read More
  111. @quercus
    Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I've lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who's been beaten silly by black gangs. Has it happened somewhere before? Sure, and you provide us with some examples. I can provide you counter examples -- just recently a man in Baltimore, who became a celebrity of sorts after going to the local police station to report his mugging only to be told it was closed), had his bike stolen by a group of black teenagers, a fairly large group of them. Was he beaten, no. He had his bike stolen. Not nice, shouldn't happen, but he wasn't beaten. I heard him recount his experience on our locally produced public radio show.

    Whites are plenty violent and vicious -- just look at all the wars. Violence committed by the state is acceptable, but violence by individuals is "beyond the pale"? Get real.

    And we've never heard you criticize the ridiculous and unctuous influence that rabidly Zionist Jews have on American foreign policy. Those who level that criticism are correct. You also seem naive enough to believe the adage "Jews are smarter ....." Bullshit. I've never met or heard a Jew who I thought was smarter than I. The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation". That's the key to their power and influence, not their IQ.

    “Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs.”

    You must live in some lily white enclave of the city and are utterly clueless. Having said that, I have to empathize with you. I grew up in a lower-middle, working class white suburb of New Jersey. I dreaded going to elemantary school because of the pricks that would torment me and I disliked the white teachers who wouldn’t raise a finger to protect me (although they would be far more protective of their own brood). I am saying this because many of the nasty accusations that “racialists” would hurl at minority-populated inner-city public schools can also be applied to white-populated suburban schools, albeit to a lesser degree.

    It wasn’t until I moved to New York that I saw blacks who behaved in the way described by “racialists”. By the way, what really purified me of white guilt was not being mugged on the subway but reading the messed up tracts printed by the Nation of Islam.

    Read More
  112. @MarkinLA
    The problem is party hacks. There used to be this guy in the southern California area, Tom McClintok. At the local level he was a constant budget hawk - the kind of guy you would think you would send to Washington to take power back to the states.

    The last I heard of him was WND article where he was crying that it was a mistake for the Republicans to not use the power of the purse to stop amnesty. Of course, he wished he could redo the vote. He got to Washington and immediately turned into a turd.

    McClintock represents Northern California, not Southern California. Unless you think of north of Sacramento as “Southern” California.

    Read More
  113. @jim sweeney
    The obvious, to me anyway, answer for is for Christian priest, ministers, reverends and other religious like Rabbis, to simply resign their civil authority to legally marry people. Let ALL marriages per se be performed at the local courts or some civil bureau. Then, religious MARRIED couples can go to their particular church/minister and have him/her perform a religious, celebratory service of their marriage. This is similar to the civil/religious practice in much of the world. Churches will then EXERCISE their religious rules of one man & one woman to which none may object. Parishoners only please and, if you're a gay couple, we don't exercise that way. I don't see any possible legal objection to that approach.

    It gets the churches out of marriage itself which, as we know, is just a contract. It keeps them in weddings however, especially religious weddings. It perfectly separates church from state and who can argue with that?

    I've argued this on my own site and, so far, nobody has even taken a shot at it.

    Try so it can be improved - thanks.

    The problem is that the State is in the marriage business because it treats single and married people differently.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kyle McKenna
    Exactly, and to an obscene degree. Which is why the State shouldn't be in the business either. It should be a private contract between individuals, if that.
  114. @Corvinus
    "Something beside your tired ass."

    So, Wyrd, you really have no definition for "white", huh?


    "No, they make the neighborhood a more comfortable place for lower income blacks to visit."

    No, they make the neighborhood a more comfortable place for ANYONE to visit. See, I live in a neighborhood with middle/upper class whites, Hispanics, blacks, Jews, and Eastern Europeans. When my neighbors have gatherings, their relatives (gasp) are generally of the same income bracket. Moreover, if their "low income" family members/friends do show up, (gasp) they may a little loud, but there is no "knock out game" or "roving gang rapists".

    "Crime goes up as the lower income blacks find things worth stealing and whites begin to flee creating a death spiral for home values."

    You are just generalizing.

    "The fact that your middle class black neighbors will be victims as well doesn’t alleviate the predictability of the process nor the damage done to the value of your home/asset."

    Again, merely generalizing. Anything else of actual substance to add?

    "The storm is coming…Lightning has struck…"

    Ok, the Coming Storm, when are YOU actually going to do something about it rather than provide hot air?

    When my neighbors have gatherings, their relatives (gasp) are generally of the same income bracket. Moreover, if their “low income” family members/friends do show up, (gasp) they may a little loud, but there is no “knock out game” or “roving gang rapists”.

    You’re lucky. That’s not how it goes everywhere. Twenty years ago, no one got shot in my small town subdivision. It’s been infrequent and intra-racial so far, but it never happened before nice black families started moving in. There have been two shootings since I moved in a couple of years ago. That’s just how it is.

    I have some experience with the black middle class and the Talented Tenth. Young black men from all background are relentlessly pressured to engage in anti-social behavior, and too many of them succumb. By the time it’s all over with, a surprising number of them have criminal records and are being garnished for child support.

    Read More
  115. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Yes, I agree.. This is well written and it is what I’ve been trying to holler about for the last 10 years or so. Thank you for the correct (words) I have been searching for and trying to convey.
    It’s very sad to me that the “Best Country in the World is now sliding into a sh*thole 3rd World Country

    Read More
  116. Nothing will change. The negro will gain more power and influence. The media will portray them in a good light. Crimes against Whites will be swept under the rug.

    It will change when the population of Mexican invaders reaches high numbers though. The Mexicans have no love for the negro, in fact they hate the negro. There is no White guilt within the Mexican or the Mexican community, blacks can not play the race card on a Mexican, it carries no weight with them – they don’t care about negro grievances.

    In Los Angeles the Mexican is displacing the negro in what were historical black slums. The negro and the Mexican are also enemies in prisons. Oddly enough Whites and Mexicans are allied against the savage negro in prisons throughout the nation. The negro will not like it when the Mexican inevitably gains political power.

    Read More
  117. @Ragno

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win?
     
    Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force.

    Gene Sue says:

    Anyone want to place bets on who will win?

    Ragno replies:

    Whichever side has the standing army and Air Force.

    Actually, it’s more like… whoever seizes the nuclear weapons. Nukes are truly Wunderwaffen.

    Read More
  118. @quercus
    Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I've lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who's been beaten silly by black gangs. Has it happened somewhere before? Sure, and you provide us with some examples. I can provide you counter examples -- just recently a man in Baltimore, who became a celebrity of sorts after going to the local police station to report his mugging only to be told it was closed), had his bike stolen by a group of black teenagers, a fairly large group of them. Was he beaten, no. He had his bike stolen. Not nice, shouldn't happen, but he wasn't beaten. I heard him recount his experience on our locally produced public radio show.

    Whites are plenty violent and vicious -- just look at all the wars. Violence committed by the state is acceptable, but violence by individuals is "beyond the pale"? Get real.

    And we've never heard you criticize the ridiculous and unctuous influence that rabidly Zionist Jews have on American foreign policy. Those who level that criticism are correct. You also seem naive enough to believe the adage "Jews are smarter ....." Bullshit. I've never met or heard a Jew who I thought was smarter than I. The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation". That's the key to their power and influence, not their IQ.

    You really could use a less tangential relationship with reality.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States

    Blacks commit homicides at rates approximately 8 times higher than whites do.

    Read More
  119. @Dr. Doom
    The only thing that can stop angry Whites are other angry Whites. However, with White homelands in Europe now being flooded with mud, White people aren't buying that phony racism label any more. The Storm has begun and the crescendo will continue to rise and no one can stop it now.
    Nothing can ever happen until it does. The dullard has not the imagination to see the possibilities that arise from different conditions. The Stupid have an extra helping of Continuity Bias the Wrong Assumption that tomorrow will be like today.
    America would not even exist if White people were unwilling to overthrow Bad Government. This irrational belief or perhaps deluded hope that White people do not have a survival instinct will cause Rivers of Non-White mud blood to flow like a river.
    Cry me a River, Bitch. The Time has Come. No one can stop the Wheel of Time and Destiny calls the Men of the West to destroy the Satanic swine and their Orc armies. Its not just coming, its already started.

    For the sake of all us Whiteys, I hope you’re right.

    Read More
  120. So damn right on. Hillary, Bush…..what a joke.
    Feeding Fred inspired.
    [gmail]

    Read More
  121. @leftist conservative

    Judging by the past, I see no evidence that Boobus Americanus is EVER going to wake up and fight back. They’ve taken no-win wars like Vietnam, Busing, massive illegal immigration, affirmative action, the de-industrialization of the heartland, inflation, foreign aid, Government corruption, run-away deficit spending, the erasure of Christianity from the Public square, constant Judicial tyranny, and a TV/pop culture that pisses on everything they hold dear without any intelligent protest.
     
    Indeed. And why SHOULD there be any revolt? In order to understand why there will not likely be any revolt, you have to understand what homo sapiens is.

    Homo sapiens, wise man, thinking man, is a biological machine. Sociobiologist EO Wilson called mankind the primate that adopted the ant/termite/bee model of social organization. That is quite correct.

    Understand the origins of our species. We developed a big brain, and it helped us survive, compete and thrive.

    How do ants and bees tell each other of food sources? Ants lay a trail of pheromones to the food source. Bees dance a dance before the other bees, and the gyrations of that dance translate to a path to the nectar trove.

    Communication of ideas.

    Primitive, compared to our own, but the concept is the same.

    Our ancestor primates grew larger brains, and thus were able to transmit, understand, and re-transmit complex ideas--how to trap the herd, how to defend the tribe with traps, how to migrate to a new food source. Our tribal leaders were able to transmit complex ideas to the tribe.

    And further, the tribe developed social bonds through a culture. That culture bound the loyalty of each tribe member to the tribe. Rituals were developed to strengthen these bonds. Tribe members who threw off these cultural bonds did not in general reproduce as much as tribe members who internalized and accepted these cultural bonds. So mankind has logic and rationality, but within certain bounds. In general, adult tribe members accept the reigning culture of the tribe. Young homo sapiens--teens-- will of course test these bounds. That trait was for various reasons something that helped homo sapiens survive.

    But in general mankind evolved and became a hierarchical tribal species that handed down a bundle of ideology from the top of the tribe, and those ideas were accepted and internalized by the rest of the tribe.

    Homo sapiens is held together by ideas and ideology. That is in our nature.

    And it worked fine. At tribal and village and small city level. We took over the world. But nowadays, in nations of hundreds of millions of people, our innate tendency to be organized around ideology is being exploited by those at the top. It's called propaganda.

    Our culture has been shaped by the efforts of those at the top. The various subcultures of america have been domesticated, evolved, shaped by those at the top in order to serve their financial interests.

    Homo sapiens domesticated livestock. The first cow was different from the cattle in the dairy farms today. The first cow ever milked by man had little milk and would kill you if it could. Not today. Big udders and a gentle disposition. Mankind, over time, bred cattle to shape the species to serve man.

    Cultures and subcultures are the same way. They are quasi-organic entities that can be shaped and molded over time by insertion of ideas friendly to those at the top--plutocrats and big corporations.

    Those cultures and subcultures control us, at least to a great degree, in general.

    These domestication of the culture has been hastened to a great degree by technology--tv and newspaper and schools and radio and movies etc are channels through which ideology is transmitted. And these channels are to a great degree centralized. Thus, the overclass can insert its ideology more easily than if ideology transmission channels were decentralized. 100 years ago, 200 years, 300 years ago, ideology transmission channels were in general much more decentralized. Ideas were to some degree transmitted from local sources--the corner church, the farmers grange, the union hall, the men's club, etc.

    In the last 75 years or so, the overclass has domesticated the culture and subcultures via these centralized ideology transmission channels. And we have been balkanized and demonized and domesticated to a fare-thee-well. Self-loathing whites who gleefully prate about the end of the white race are domesticated creatures owned by the overclass. Likewise, "conservative" whites whose every other word is "socialist," same thing. Owned. Domestic cattle of the overclass.

    There is really only one source of possible help--the internet. As it grows more sophisticated, person to person transmission channels are becoming more dominant. Look at facebook. Compare news story transmission from 30 years ago to what goes on today. 30 years ago, a new story was published by the overclass in a newspaper, and it went right into your brain.

    Today, however, that story is shared on facebook, and the sharer gives his/her own opinion on it. And facebook friends comment. A different dynamic. One that may not bode well for the overclass control over the culture.

    Soon, no doubt, more and more person to person, mass communication channels will be opened up by the internet by means of wireless internet over large cities. This may well be a game changer. Completely decentralized.

    I do not do what I do for money. I do this to inject my ideas into the stream of ideas. The better to fight back against the overclass and help change the culture.

    Ah, sweet release. I have injected my ideas into your brain. Ah....

    leftist conservative….”But in general mankind evolved and became a hierarchical tribal species that handed down a bundle of ideology from the top of the tribe, and those ideas were accepted and internalized by the rest of the tribe.

    Homo sapiens is held together by ideas and ideology. That is in our nature.”

    That is a mouthful. There is definitely something in it but let me suggest first, that ‘ideas and ideology’ cannot defeat impulses from the genes. Second, powerful impulses like sex and hunger cannot be defeated at all, although they can be a tiny bit channeled.

    Thirdly, “Ideas” have not generally had much of a role until relatively recently meaning the last couple thousand years. The primal horde, village agriculture, etc. got along just fine without Ideas, or ideologies. Things were just the way they were and appeared totally natural.

    Fourth, ‘natural’ acceptance of social life, dominated by a Big Man, dynastic relations, and social forms consistent with the “natural aristocracy” and inequality in general did not need any
    ‘ideas.’

    Fifth, Religion enters and Big Ideas.

    Then Ideas ultimately begin to address social life, for good and ill.
    —————
    Today, the Big Ideas are virtually all Liberal Ideas. Conservatives have had few Ideas. Ideas are usually untethered to empirical reality…they are empty.

    So, the natural impulses today contradict liberal big Ideas, egalitarian ideas of every type.

    The natural impulses of Man as Social (not Political) Animal, are race/group/family affiliative impulses. They spontaneously appear despite Bad Liberal Ideas. However, it takes a while for Whites, especially smart Whites, to overcome their altruistic impulses and perceive social and individual reality. Say, the average age for Whites who bother with ideas at all, to come to their senses or natural impulses, is 35 or 40.

    So, this is how the counter-revolution will begin, despite the lies of the jews and liberals, etc.
    Also, keeping alive the “scientific racism” ( as the anti-fas call it ) is very important, and that is what White Nationalists are basically doing.

    So reality based ideas help out the natural process of discarding Bad Ideas which conflict with perceived and felt social and racial reality, as well as individual reality as in, for example, awakening to the fact that you may have married the wrong person.

    ———– Point: Ideology cannot conquer Reality, but it can influence it. We are lucky to be living in a time when the Bad Ideas are like fat burning in the fire of counter-revolution.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  122. @Wyrd
    This is a coalition to ban coalitions
    I ain't a politician but I've got views
    Some folks want to ban cars
    Some want to get rid of Fender guitars

    Why don't you do your thing
    And we do our thing too?
    Now they want to take my cigarettes
    And all my good whiskey

    And these damn coalitions
    They're after you and me
    They want to get rid of my forty fours
    And all the R rated films

    If they only knew how much
    We'd all love to get rid of them
    And this is a coalition to ban coalitions
    The views of a musician, yeah, I've got some

    Some folks want to ban cars
    Some want to get rid of electric guitars
    Why can't everybody else
    Leave everybody else alone?

    Now the latest thing they want
    To stomp out is violence on TV
    And the worst of all
    Is that Oscar winning rabbit Bugs Bunny

    Farewell, Foghorn Leghorn
    So long Yosemite Sam
    They're messing with our heroes
    And we got to stop them now

    And this is a coalition to ban coalitions

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrXnDbOpxU4

    Ha ha! I’m actually not the biggest Hank Williams Jr. fan; he’s a redneck’s redneck.
    I almost didn’t post the “Country Boys Can Survive” video because as great a song as it is, his best, he is way too thug acting in it for my taste. But I love that song (who doesn’t?)

    My tastes run more toward Waylon Jennings, John Anderson, Willie Nelson, Johnny Cash, etc.

    Waylon, of course, is King. John Anderson, though, was more acquainted with being on the receiving end of pain, lacking Waylon’s sometimes cockiness. John’s songs (Bend it Until it Breaks, When it Comes to you) thus are even more soulful, which didn’t seem possible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wyrd
    Ha ha! I’m actually not the biggest Hank Williams Jr. fan

    Your loss.

  123. @Dahlia
    Ha ha! I'm actually not the biggest Hank Williams Jr. fan; he's a redneck's redneck.
    I almost didn't post the "Country Boys Can Survive" video because as great a song as it is, his best, he is way too thug acting in it for my taste. But I love that song (who doesn't?)

    My tastes run more toward Waylon Jennings, John Anderson, Willie Nelson, Johnny Cash, etc.

    Waylon, of course, is King. John Anderson, though, was more acquainted with being on the receiving end of pain, lacking Waylon's sometimes cockiness. John's songs (Bend it Until it Breaks, When it Comes to you) thus are even more soulful, which didn't seem possible.

    Ha ha! I’m actually not the biggest Hank Williams Jr. fan

    Your loss.

    Read More
  124. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anonymous
    Don't forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??

    I hear ya.

    Read More
    • Replies: @marylou
    Stupid song.

    They might shoot the last doe out of season to feed their faces, and then what?
    An Amish boy might survive, but the country boys will be down on them soon when their grub runs out.

    Sorry, not impressed with the country boys.
  125. @leftist conservative

    The Republicans want to misuse the power of the Presidency just as much as the Democrats. Local party hacks want to be national party hacks. Do you expect them to break ranks with the guys in Washington.
     
    Well, of course they do. ...but you want to increase the control that the majority has over the government. That is the goal. So, you have a goal and you want to achieve it. How does one achieve any goal? You find out what you need to do, and you do it.

    What do we need to do to achieve more control over our politicians?

    Well, you want as united an electorate as possible.

    Which is more united? the national electorate or the state electorate? How about the electorate at the county level? At the city level? In general, what can you say about the unity of the electorate at these different levels?

    Start from fundamental principles. You determine/induce these principles, discover what they are, and then ya write 'em down. You codify them.

    Then you go out and find allies. You say to them, "Hey, look what I found!"

    And then you all start to achieve this goal.

    How do you do it? You start at the city level. You say, "we are going to elect politicians, starting at the local level, that want to call an article 5 constitutional convention and amend the constitution to send more power back to the states."

    It's a process. It starts at the local level. You elect politicians who want to do this and they educate the public. It will take years. One step at a time.

    “we are going to elect politicians, starting at the local level, that want to call an article 5 constitutional convention and amend the constitution to send more power back to the states.”

    You already have a constitution that reserves power to the states. How’s that working?

    Read More
  126. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    This was very difficult for me to read. It’s taken me two days to understand what about this article I found so disturbing and the realization has not been pleasant. My father could have written this. Every word of it. None of you know me, and therefore none of you know how exquisitely sad that makes me. I expect better from him.

    In my hypocrisy, I didn’t even consider that I used to think in tracks that ran quite close to this. I expect better from myself.

    One year ago I would have made similar arguments. I believed the battle flag stood for states rights and defiance of tyranny. I thought the Civil war had been about states rights, not slavery. I thought race wars were eminent, and state governments were the answer to most problems. Then I changed my mind.

    Taking the confederate flag down was the correct decision. Yes, it was a battle flag, but it was still employed by the confederacy in the war. It is undoubtedly a symbol of oppression and white supremacy, especially when consideration is given to its more recent history as a symbol of defiance during the civil rights pushes. Whatever meaning has been tracked on: opposition to tyranny, states rights, southern deviance, that flag has a twisted past and the state government should not be in the business of endorsing one understanding over another. Unfortunately, the souths preferred understanding of the history of that flag has little to support it. People often claim states rights was the central issue of the war, but the south seceded because other states exercised their rights. When the north chose to quit enforcing or even tolerating the fugitive slave act, the south was incensed. That, and the growing prevalence of the abolitionist movement were the direct causes of the civil war. Others claim tariffs were the primary cause, but tariffs are barely mentioned in the given causes of secession. Not only that, but the south had the political power to prevent those tariffs from ever becoming law. The south was not helpless against the federal Government, it had been instrumental in increasing the authority of the federal Government at the time. The south wielded an incredible amount of influence, especially in the less democratic sectors of the government. Had the tariffs gone to the floor, the south could easily have defeated the bill in the Senate if not the house. The south seceded. It never bothered to vote against the tariffs. It was far too concerned about slavery and the supremacy of the white race. That is not to say that the north fought against slavery. The collective north fought to preserve the union, it cared little for any sort of abolitionism. Look at Lincoln for all the evidence you need. Still, individually, almost every northern state had banned slavery in one way or another by time the war broke out. Morally, the north had by far the higher ground; if only because slavery is such an evil institution. The same war was fought by the two sides for different reasons- the south for slavery, the north for Lincoln’s legacy and economic security.

    That complicated truth makes much of this anger over southern legacy misplaced. Compound that with the racist sentiments- that are either growing or revealing themselves- gaining in prevalence, and the south (or perhaps more accurately, the right) is setting itself up to fail miserably. This applies directly to immigration. Immigrants are not evil. They are not mostly or even largely malicious. The vast majority are criminals only because they came here in desperation, seeking a better life. Most of the crime centers around the border, where super powerful drug cartels are using violence to facilitate business. That accounts for almost all violent crime from illegal immigrants. And one of the most successful immigrant populations, statistically, are the nigerians who become citizens. They do better than most white people. Asians do far superior to everyone, at least by the numbers. Racism doesn’t make sense.

    While I despise racism as much as anyone has ever despised anything, I would not criminalize it. I would not criminalize it because individual rights: freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom to engage in lawful enterprise, etc., should always be the priority of any government. And while that means allowing people to be racist, it also means allowing gay men to marry if they so wish. It means opposing a state government endorsing a violent and turbulent past, and opposing a state government seeking punitive damages against a bakery for refusing a customer. States rights are all to often the refuge of those who seek the authority to impose their beliefs on others without interference from a federal government. States don’t have rights, nor does the federal government; individuals do.

    So as everyone here simmers, feeling oppressed and disgusted, beat in mind that if you go looking for conflict for the wrong reasons, then you will be worse than the government you profess to hate. The government has largely been non-violent up to now, the aggressor will be the one who is and should rightly be condemned.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sunbeam
    For the love of god...

    You are an utter narcissist. Do you really expect the world to revolve around your internal kabuki theater?

    I could write pages and pages dissecting your post. The odds say you aren't religious, but I get the feeling I'm a prop in the passion play of your life.

    Sorry dude, I'm not going to hang around under the cross while you suffer for the sins of man. And I do not care to dice for your robes - they don't suit me.

    I'm gonna head out and grab a beer and some first century ad munchies. Not sure who you are going to get for an audience.

    Well that's assuming you are what you claim you are, and the post you made isn't some kind of framing thing to construct a narrative. You know the good ol' sales pitch to win hearts and minds.
    , @joe webb
    You "despise racism." You are an idiot, a social climber, a herd animal of the worst type, a badge seeker, an ostrich complete with head in jewyorktimes, a race hustler, a holier than thou hypocrite, etc.

    Put your money and life where your mouth is and move to the hood and BE a good liberal, the brothers-hood, and when your daughter is raped, pray for the darkies..an then breed another darkie from their gene pool, in other words, marry one or STFU.

    Damned fool, White race traitor, etc. You are the reason we are committing race suicide.

    Joe Webb
    , @Eustace Tilley (not)


    "The government has largely been non-violent up to now..."

    O.K., so what planet have you just beamed down to Earth from? Tralfamador? Arrakis? Krypton?

    This is one of the most self-deluded pieces I have read on this otherwise-interesting website.

  127. @Anonymous
    This was very difficult for me to read. It's taken me two days to understand what about this article I found so disturbing and the realization has not been pleasant. My father could have written this. Every word of it. None of you know me, and therefore none of you know how exquisitely sad that makes me. I expect better from him.

    In my hypocrisy, I didn't even consider that I used to think in tracks that ran quite close to this. I expect better from myself.

    One year ago I would have made similar arguments. I believed the battle flag stood for states rights and defiance of tyranny. I thought the Civil war had been about states rights, not slavery. I thought race wars were eminent, and state governments were the answer to most problems. Then I changed my mind.

    Taking the confederate flag down was the correct decision. Yes, it was a battle flag, but it was still employed by the confederacy in the war. It is undoubtedly a symbol of oppression and white supremacy, especially when consideration is given to its more recent history as a symbol of defiance during the civil rights pushes. Whatever meaning has been tracked on: opposition to tyranny, states rights, southern deviance, that flag has a twisted past and the state government should not be in the business of endorsing one understanding over another. Unfortunately, the souths preferred understanding of the history of that flag has little to support it. People often claim states rights was the central issue of the war, but the south seceded because other states exercised their rights. When the north chose to quit enforcing or even tolerating the fugitive slave act, the south was incensed. That, and the growing prevalence of the abolitionist movement were the direct causes of the civil war. Others claim tariffs were the primary cause, but tariffs are barely mentioned in the given causes of secession. Not only that, but the south had the political power to prevent those tariffs from ever becoming law. The south was not helpless against the federal Government, it had been instrumental in increasing the authority of the federal Government at the time. The south wielded an incredible amount of influence, especially in the less democratic sectors of the government. Had the tariffs gone to the floor, the south could easily have defeated the bill in the Senate if not the house. The south seceded. It never bothered to vote against the tariffs. It was far too concerned about slavery and the supremacy of the white race. That is not to say that the north fought against slavery. The collective north fought to preserve the union, it cared little for any sort of abolitionism. Look at Lincoln for all the evidence you need. Still, individually, almost every northern state had banned slavery in one way or another by time the war broke out. Morally, the north had by far the higher ground; if only because slavery is such an evil institution. The same war was fought by the two sides for different reasons- the south for slavery, the north for Lincoln's legacy and economic security.

    That complicated truth makes much of this anger over southern legacy misplaced. Compound that with the racist sentiments- that are either growing or revealing themselves- gaining in prevalence, and the south (or perhaps more accurately, the right) is setting itself up to fail miserably. This applies directly to immigration. Immigrants are not evil. They are not mostly or even largely malicious. The vast majority are criminals only because they came here in desperation, seeking a better life. Most of the crime centers around the border, where super powerful drug cartels are using violence to facilitate business. That accounts for almost all violent crime from illegal immigrants. And one of the most successful immigrant populations, statistically, are the nigerians who become citizens. They do better than most white people. Asians do far superior to everyone, at least by the numbers. Racism doesn't make sense.

    While I despise racism as much as anyone has ever despised anything, I would not criminalize it. I would not criminalize it because individual rights: freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom to engage in lawful enterprise, etc., should always be the priority of any government. And while that means allowing people to be racist, it also means allowing gay men to marry if they so wish. It means opposing a state government endorsing a violent and turbulent past, and opposing a state government seeking punitive damages against a bakery for refusing a customer. States rights are all to often the refuge of those who seek the authority to impose their beliefs on others without interference from a federal government. States don't have rights, nor does the federal government; individuals do.

    So as everyone here simmers, feeling oppressed and disgusted, beat in mind that if you go looking for conflict for the wrong reasons, then you will be worse than the government you profess to hate. The government has largely been non-violent up to now, the aggressor will be the one who is and should rightly be condemned.

    For the love of god…

    You are an utter narcissist. Do you really expect the world to revolve around your internal kabuki theater?

    I could write pages and pages dissecting your post. The odds say you aren’t religious, but I get the feeling I’m a prop in the passion play of your life.

    Sorry dude, I’m not going to hang around under the cross while you suffer for the sins of man. And I do not care to dice for your robes – they don’t suit me.

    I’m gonna head out and grab a beer and some first century ad munchies. Not sure who you are going to get for an audience.

    Well that’s assuming you are what you claim you are, and the post you made isn’t some kind of framing thing to construct a narrative. You know the good ol’ sales pitch to win hearts and minds.

    Read More
  128. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Someone just sent me this piece. Left me feeling like I want to give him a good southern whuppin’, like the @monikerjackass above:

    http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-forsaken.html?showComment=1436795489370#c4652301847539381109

    what is wrong with people? Fred why do you feel the Jews are good and all? Look at the shite in that piece

    Read More
  129. @quercus
    Knock it off, Fred, with the blacks are more violent, crap. I've lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who's been beaten silly by black gangs. Has it happened somewhere before? Sure, and you provide us with some examples. I can provide you counter examples -- just recently a man in Baltimore, who became a celebrity of sorts after going to the local police station to report his mugging only to be told it was closed), had his bike stolen by a group of black teenagers, a fairly large group of them. Was he beaten, no. He had his bike stolen. Not nice, shouldn't happen, but he wasn't beaten. I heard him recount his experience on our locally produced public radio show.

    Whites are plenty violent and vicious -- just look at all the wars. Violence committed by the state is acceptable, but violence by individuals is "beyond the pale"? Get real.

    And we've never heard you criticize the ridiculous and unctuous influence that rabidly Zionist Jews have on American foreign policy. Those who level that criticism are correct. You also seem naive enough to believe the adage "Jews are smarter ....." Bullshit. I've never met or heard a Jew who I thought was smarter than I. The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation". That's the key to their power and influence, not their IQ.

    You are insane to think a race war isn’t already happening and even more ignorant to the realities of race. You are a whitecuck and the enemy.

    FBI statistics below
    Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 20,309
    Black on Black: 21,104
    Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 11,610
    Black on Black: 35,330
    Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black : 0
    Black on White: 37,460
    Black on Black: 36, 620
    Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 32, 443
    Black on Black: 7,705
    Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 14,092
    Black on Black: 12,780
    Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 19,292
    Black on Black: 34,841
    Total over six conservative years:
    White on Black: 0
    Black on White: 135,206
    Black on Black: 148,380

    Read More
  130. @Anonymous
    This was very difficult for me to read. It's taken me two days to understand what about this article I found so disturbing and the realization has not been pleasant. My father could have written this. Every word of it. None of you know me, and therefore none of you know how exquisitely sad that makes me. I expect better from him.

    In my hypocrisy, I didn't even consider that I used to think in tracks that ran quite close to this. I expect better from myself.

    One year ago I would have made similar arguments. I believed the battle flag stood for states rights and defiance of tyranny. I thought the Civil war had been about states rights, not slavery. I thought race wars were eminent, and state governments were the answer to most problems. Then I changed my mind.

    Taking the confederate flag down was the correct decision. Yes, it was a battle flag, but it was still employed by the confederacy in the war. It is undoubtedly a symbol of oppression and white supremacy, especially when consideration is given to its more recent history as a symbol of defiance during the civil rights pushes. Whatever meaning has been tracked on: opposition to tyranny, states rights, southern deviance, that flag has a twisted past and the state government should not be in the business of endorsing one understanding over another. Unfortunately, the souths preferred understanding of the history of that flag has little to support it. People often claim states rights was the central issue of the war, but the south seceded because other states exercised their rights. When the north chose to quit enforcing or even tolerating the fugitive slave act, the south was incensed. That, and the growing prevalence of the abolitionist movement were the direct causes of the civil war. Others claim tariffs were the primary cause, but tariffs are barely mentioned in the given causes of secession. Not only that, but the south had the political power to prevent those tariffs from ever becoming law. The south was not helpless against the federal Government, it had been instrumental in increasing the authority of the federal Government at the time. The south wielded an incredible amount of influence, especially in the less democratic sectors of the government. Had the tariffs gone to the floor, the south could easily have defeated the bill in the Senate if not the house. The south seceded. It never bothered to vote against the tariffs. It was far too concerned about slavery and the supremacy of the white race. That is not to say that the north fought against slavery. The collective north fought to preserve the union, it cared little for any sort of abolitionism. Look at Lincoln for all the evidence you need. Still, individually, almost every northern state had banned slavery in one way or another by time the war broke out. Morally, the north had by far the higher ground; if only because slavery is such an evil institution. The same war was fought by the two sides for different reasons- the south for slavery, the north for Lincoln's legacy and economic security.

    That complicated truth makes much of this anger over southern legacy misplaced. Compound that with the racist sentiments- that are either growing or revealing themselves- gaining in prevalence, and the south (or perhaps more accurately, the right) is setting itself up to fail miserably. This applies directly to immigration. Immigrants are not evil. They are not mostly or even largely malicious. The vast majority are criminals only because they came here in desperation, seeking a better life. Most of the crime centers around the border, where super powerful drug cartels are using violence to facilitate business. That accounts for almost all violent crime from illegal immigrants. And one of the most successful immigrant populations, statistically, are the nigerians who become citizens. They do better than most white people. Asians do far superior to everyone, at least by the numbers. Racism doesn't make sense.

    While I despise racism as much as anyone has ever despised anything, I would not criminalize it. I would not criminalize it because individual rights: freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom to engage in lawful enterprise, etc., should always be the priority of any government. And while that means allowing people to be racist, it also means allowing gay men to marry if they so wish. It means opposing a state government endorsing a violent and turbulent past, and opposing a state government seeking punitive damages against a bakery for refusing a customer. States rights are all to often the refuge of those who seek the authority to impose their beliefs on others without interference from a federal government. States don't have rights, nor does the federal government; individuals do.

    So as everyone here simmers, feeling oppressed and disgusted, beat in mind that if you go looking for conflict for the wrong reasons, then you will be worse than the government you profess to hate. The government has largely been non-violent up to now, the aggressor will be the one who is and should rightly be condemned.

    You “despise racism.” You are an idiot, a social climber, a herd animal of the worst type, a badge seeker, an ostrich complete with head in jewyorktimes, a race hustler, a holier than thou hypocrite, etc.

    Put your money and life where your mouth is and move to the hood and BE a good liberal, the brothers-hood, and when your daughter is raped, pray for the darkies..an then breed another darkie from their gene pool, in other words, marry one or STFU.

    Damned fool, White race traitor, etc. You are the reason we are committing race suicide.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  131. Eustace Tilley (not) [AKA "Schiller/Nietzsche"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anonymous
    This was very difficult for me to read. It's taken me two days to understand what about this article I found so disturbing and the realization has not been pleasant. My father could have written this. Every word of it. None of you know me, and therefore none of you know how exquisitely sad that makes me. I expect better from him.

    In my hypocrisy, I didn't even consider that I used to think in tracks that ran quite close to this. I expect better from myself.

    One year ago I would have made similar arguments. I believed the battle flag stood for states rights and defiance of tyranny. I thought the Civil war had been about states rights, not slavery. I thought race wars were eminent, and state governments were the answer to most problems. Then I changed my mind.

    Taking the confederate flag down was the correct decision. Yes, it was a battle flag, but it was still employed by the confederacy in the war. It is undoubtedly a symbol of oppression and white supremacy, especially when consideration is given to its more recent history as a symbol of defiance during the civil rights pushes. Whatever meaning has been tracked on: opposition to tyranny, states rights, southern deviance, that flag has a twisted past and the state government should not be in the business of endorsing one understanding over another. Unfortunately, the souths preferred understanding of the history of that flag has little to support it. People often claim states rights was the central issue of the war, but the south seceded because other states exercised their rights. When the north chose to quit enforcing or even tolerating the fugitive slave act, the south was incensed. That, and the growing prevalence of the abolitionist movement were the direct causes of the civil war. Others claim tariffs were the primary cause, but tariffs are barely mentioned in the given causes of secession. Not only that, but the south had the political power to prevent those tariffs from ever becoming law. The south was not helpless against the federal Government, it had been instrumental in increasing the authority of the federal Government at the time. The south wielded an incredible amount of influence, especially in the less democratic sectors of the government. Had the tariffs gone to the floor, the south could easily have defeated the bill in the Senate if not the house. The south seceded. It never bothered to vote against the tariffs. It was far too concerned about slavery and the supremacy of the white race. That is not to say that the north fought against slavery. The collective north fought to preserve the union, it cared little for any sort of abolitionism. Look at Lincoln for all the evidence you need. Still, individually, almost every northern state had banned slavery in one way or another by time the war broke out. Morally, the north had by far the higher ground; if only because slavery is such an evil institution. The same war was fought by the two sides for different reasons- the south for slavery, the north for Lincoln's legacy and economic security.

    That complicated truth makes much of this anger over southern legacy misplaced. Compound that with the racist sentiments- that are either growing or revealing themselves- gaining in prevalence, and the south (or perhaps more accurately, the right) is setting itself up to fail miserably. This applies directly to immigration. Immigrants are not evil. They are not mostly or even largely malicious. The vast majority are criminals only because they came here in desperation, seeking a better life. Most of the crime centers around the border, where super powerful drug cartels are using violence to facilitate business. That accounts for almost all violent crime from illegal immigrants. And one of the most successful immigrant populations, statistically, are the nigerians who become citizens. They do better than most white people. Asians do far superior to everyone, at least by the numbers. Racism doesn't make sense.

    While I despise racism as much as anyone has ever despised anything, I would not criminalize it. I would not criminalize it because individual rights: freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom to engage in lawful enterprise, etc., should always be the priority of any government. And while that means allowing people to be racist, it also means allowing gay men to marry if they so wish. It means opposing a state government endorsing a violent and turbulent past, and opposing a state government seeking punitive damages against a bakery for refusing a customer. States rights are all to often the refuge of those who seek the authority to impose their beliefs on others without interference from a federal government. States don't have rights, nor does the federal government; individuals do.

    So as everyone here simmers, feeling oppressed and disgusted, beat in mind that if you go looking for conflict for the wrong reasons, then you will be worse than the government you profess to hate. The government has largely been non-violent up to now, the aggressor will be the one who is and should rightly be condemned.

    “The government has largely been non-violent up to now…”

    O.K., so what planet have you just beamed down to Earth from? Tralfamador? Arrakis? Krypton?

    This is one of the most self-deluded pieces I have read on this otherwise-interesting website.

    Read More
  132. “It’s a white thing, you wouldn’t understand.”

    Define “white” in the King’s English. We’re waiting…

    “However, with White homelands in Europe now being flooded with mud…”

    That’s observably false.

    “The Storm has begun and the crescendo will continue to rise and no one can stop it now.”

    Again, what are YOU actually doing besides bloviating on a blog? What kind of direct action are you taking? Elaborate.

    “This irrational belief or perhaps deluded hope that White people do not have a survival instinct will cause Rivers of Non-White mud blood to flow like a river.”

    There is little to indicate that your scenario will take place now or in the near future.

    “Young black men from all background are relentlessly pressured to engage in anti-social behavior, and too many of them succumb.”

    
No, they are not “pressured”. People make a choice. Middle and upper class black men have even more disdain for their criminal brethren. Unfortunately, similar to whites or Jews or Hispanics or Asians who have relatives or friends who are thugs, they don’t consistently and openly call them out on it.

    “Crimes against Whites will be swept under the rug.”

    
Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race.

    “You are the reason we are committing race suicide.”

    There is observably no such thing as “white race suicide” being committed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wyrd
    “It’s a white thing, you wouldn’t understand.”

    Define “white” in the King’s English. We’re waiting…



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct8V4nF9oOI
    , @The Albino Sasquatch
    "Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race"
    Actually Corvinus it doesn't. That's why you don't hear about the Wichita Massacre, the Knoxville 5 or Antonio West - a 13 month old infant shot dead by two African Americans. No, it wasn't a hate crime, of course it wasn't. I bet you didn't hear about Allen Coon either, set alight by two African American attackers who said "this is what you get white boy" No it wasn't a hate crime, of course it wasn't. This was just a short time before Trayvon mania - which of course we ALL know about it. That's just a short list - either way makes no difference to you, does it? White lives don't matter. Black lies do. Now all join - let's hear it again and again and again - Trayvon Trayvon Trayvon Trayvon Michael Brown Michael Brown Michael Brown Michael Brown, Freddie Gray Freddie Gray Freddie Gray - and a medley for Eric Garner. Hands up don't shoot. Black lives matter. Hands up don't shoot eh? Didn't do much for Dillon Taylor did it? White, unarmed, shot dead. Didn't hear about that one did you? No but we all know who shot Michael Brown, in fact, we'll never be allowed to hear the end of it.
    You hateful moron.
    , @Billy Chav

    “Crimes against Whites will be swept under the rug.”

    
Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race.

     

    Sorry, you don't pass the Turing test.
  133. @Corvinus
    “It’s a white thing, you wouldn’t understand.”

    Define “white” in the King’s English. We’re waiting...

    “However, with White homelands in Europe now being flooded with mud...”

    That’s observably false.

    “The Storm has begun and the crescendo will continue to rise and no one can stop it now.”

    Again, what are YOU actually doing besides bloviating on a blog? What kind of direct action are you taking? Elaborate.

    “This irrational belief or perhaps deluded hope that White people do not have a survival instinct will cause Rivers of Non-White mud blood to flow like a river.”

    There is little to indicate that your scenario will take place now or in the near future.

    “Young black men from all background are relentlessly pressured to engage in anti-social behavior, and too many of them succumb.”

    
No, they are not “pressured”. People make a choice. Middle and upper class black men have even more disdain for their criminal brethren. Unfortunately, similar to whites or Jews or Hispanics or Asians who have relatives or friends who are thugs, they don’t consistently and openly call them out on it.

    “Crimes against Whites will be swept under the rug.”

    
Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race.

    “You are the reason we are committing race suicide.”

    There is observably no such thing as “white race suicide” being committed.

    “It’s a white thing, you wouldn’t understand.”

    Define “white” in the King’s English. We’re waiting…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct8V4nF9oOI

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dahlia
    The All My Rowdy Friends are Coming Over Tonight is a hilarious video that meant a lot to 12-year-old boys back in its day:) Fun, 80s goodness:
    https://youtu.be/k2GBQqSKl8w
  134. @Wyrd
    “It’s a white thing, you wouldn’t understand.”

    Define “white” in the King’s English. We’re waiting…



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct8V4nF9oOI

    The All My Rowdy Friends are Coming Over Tonight is a hilarious video that meant a lot to 12-year-old boys back in its day:) Fun, 80s goodness:
    https://youtu.be/k2GBQqSKl8w

    Read More
  135. @Corvinus
    “It’s a white thing, you wouldn’t understand.”

    Define “white” in the King’s English. We’re waiting...

    “However, with White homelands in Europe now being flooded with mud...”

    That’s observably false.

    “The Storm has begun and the crescendo will continue to rise and no one can stop it now.”

    Again, what are YOU actually doing besides bloviating on a blog? What kind of direct action are you taking? Elaborate.

    “This irrational belief or perhaps deluded hope that White people do not have a survival instinct will cause Rivers of Non-White mud blood to flow like a river.”

    There is little to indicate that your scenario will take place now or in the near future.

    “Young black men from all background are relentlessly pressured to engage in anti-social behavior, and too many of them succumb.”

    
No, they are not “pressured”. People make a choice. Middle and upper class black men have even more disdain for their criminal brethren. Unfortunately, similar to whites or Jews or Hispanics or Asians who have relatives or friends who are thugs, they don’t consistently and openly call them out on it.

    “Crimes against Whites will be swept under the rug.”

    
Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race.

    “You are the reason we are committing race suicide.”

    There is observably no such thing as “white race suicide” being committed.

    “Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race”
    Actually Corvinus it doesn’t. That’s why you don’t hear about the Wichita Massacre, the Knoxville 5 or Antonio West – a 13 month old infant shot dead by two African Americans. No, it wasn’t a hate crime, of course it wasn’t. I bet you didn’t hear about Allen Coon either, set alight by two African American attackers who said “this is what you get white boy” No it wasn’t a hate crime, of course it wasn’t. This was just a short time before Trayvon mania – which of course we ALL know about it. That’s just a short list – either way makes no difference to you, does it? White lives don’t matter. Black lies do. Now all join – let’s hear it again and again and again – Trayvon Trayvon Trayvon Trayvon Michael Brown Michael Brown Michael Brown Michael Brown, Freddie Gray Freddie Gray Freddie Gray – and a medley for Eric Garner. Hands up don’t shoot. Black lives matter. Hands up don’t shoot eh? Didn’t do much for Dillon Taylor did it? White, unarmed, shot dead. Didn’t hear about that one did you? No but we all know who shot Michael Brown, in fact, we’ll never be allowed to hear the end of it.
    You hateful moron.

    Read More
    • Replies: @marylou
    ...and of course nobody cares about Johnathan Foster, the little white boy who was burnt to death with a blow torch.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtZPrA0rwLI

    http://abc13.com/archive/9220368/

    It seems white people do not care when other white people's little children are brutally murdered by a black.
    This criminal activity was covered regardless of race exactly where?

    Has anybody heard about this "local" incident?

    The other way around it would have been international news for weeks.
  136. @Anonymous
    Please keep my religion out of your mouth I in now way want anything to change in this country other than all the bs that's going on now. I support your right as a Christian but I hope you are also not a bigot and support my right.

    You don’t seem to have inherited the usual Jewish facility with verbal expression. Nevertheless, if your reading comprehension is moderately functional, you could look at the work of Dr. Kevin McDonald to learn why some believe that the Jewish influence in the U.S. has not been benign. Start with “The Culture of Critique.” Also the website “The Occidental Observer.”

    Read More
  137. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Ragno
    Great. That makes one.

    Why, on sites like this one, do we only hear from Jews who "agree with us" but only to defuse looming/potential criticism of your own? Were you about to post a much longer screed exhibiting rancor and disgust at the 90+% of your co-religionists who are currently paving over Western Civilization with the magical curative of tikkun olam? Or are we about to go 'round the mulberry bush again, playing it's a race/ no, it's a religion/ no, you're both anti-Semites!, because frankly that is one seriously tiresome parlor game, and I no longer wish to play.

    Hey - relax. Just funnin' you. I've been reading Fred for a decade plus now and I assure you - nothing on this Earth, up to and including massacre sites with Stars of David burned permanently into the earth left behind as a calling card, could ever get Fred to point a finger at the Tribe. From a Jewish perspective, he's the ideal white conservative: it's the blacks or it's the Muslims and/or it's the white politicians; end of story. As far as he's concerned, cui bono is one of Cher's in-laws.

    Bullshit. You’ve paved yourself over. Did you give up meat? At least factory meat? Have a lot of children and grandchildren? Give up schools? Give up pharma and other vaccines? Give up artificial foods? Get out of the tax system, credit system, vehicle system, insurance system? When’s the last time you pioneered some new ground?

    Nothing but a bunch of whinging baby boomers. A little peasant rebellion by arthritic gut heavy morons.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ragno
    Nothing you posted in your response to my earlier comment makes any sense. It's just random survivalist paranoia pretending to be something else.

    By the way, since you're advocating washing your hands of everything but firearms as vectors of almost-certain pussification - did you know you're on a computer right now?

    Quick! - cut off your hands before the contagion spreads into your brain, man!......whoops! Too late.
  138. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anonymous
    Don't forget southerners fish and hunt for sport , we teach our kids to shoot and live off the land. We can survive in the woods can you??

    i really don’t believe that for one second. you hunt and fish with commercial equipment and drive to the wilderness.

    It’s always someone elses fault. Lost the Civil War? Damn Yankees! Yeah, whatever. You still lost. Now you’re crying about a flag.

    I do like the flag though- Scottish Cross.

    Read More
  139. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Wyrd
    The Confederate battle-flag is only offensive to neo-puritan trash who want to lord their holier-than-thou self-righteousness over everyone else in the US. Those morally-preening lot can't stand dissent and so their totalitarian bent is exposed. They no more care a whit about the negroes now they claim to brotherly love than when they left 1/4 of them to die of deprivation, disease, and starvation in the wake of the War Of Northern Aggression.

    ah but we won our war so now whatcha gonna do? you can’t even own your families or the fat flubbering over your trousers. Could you even run fast enough to fight anymore? Go eat some pork rinds and cheetoes.

    Read More
  140. GREAT song, Wyrd, but you have not defined “white”.

    “That’s why you don’t hear about the Wichita Massacre, the Knoxville 5 or Antonio West – a 13 month old infant shot dead by two African Americans.”

    I don’t live in Wichita or Knoxville. They are local incidents. And a Google search of those incidents clearly demonstrate they were reported by the media.

    Read More
    • Replies: @marylou
    I don't live in Winchester or Knoxville either, nor in Ferguson, Baltimore or the like.

    So can you explain why T.Martin and Michael Brown are on the News in Europe? A black thug gets killed by a white policeman and it is world news. Innocent whites get tortured to death by blacks, no one cares.
    That you don't care does not wonder me, but that whites get upset when you point it out to them...

    The handful of white males that want to start fighting back won't amount to a hill of beans.
    , @The Albino Sasquatch
    I don't live in Knoxville or Wichita either - or any other places where your patron saints were 'murdered' by evil, hating, racist whiteys. Trayvon, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Freddie Gray - we heard about it - and are still hearing about it for weeks & months and no doubt, decades to come. The media and race baiters such as yourselves love it, whipping up hatred and hysteria against whites. The fact that you had to google those incidents I listed proves my point - that is - when a hate crime is committed upon a white it is never a hate crime and is barely, if at all, reported. But - keep it up, one day this 'black rage' & hatred towards whites you revel in encouraging - just one day, come for you. And don't expect any sympathy or reporting of it either.
  141. let me define White for everyone’s edification. Make a list of those things material and spiritual that have NOT been invented by Whites.

    It will consist of about ten words. EVERYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN INVENTED BY WHITES, ESPECIALLY FREE SPEECH, WHICH NO OTHER RACE HAS OR EVER WILL INVENT.

    You can go to the bank that if
    Whites vanish, the world will return to some version of Africa and China, unless the Chinks kill all the Africans, and then it will be Yellow Devil…total money one-dimensionality, and totalitarianism that makes Orwell look naive.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  142. Joe, I do thank you for your effort, even if it was poorly conceived and executed. Your definition is (gasp) a social construct by virtue that it takes no consideration to any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. Besides, how is YOUR definition definitive compared to other people?

    “You can go to the bank that if Whites vanish, the world will return to some version of Africa and China.”

    See, race baiters such as yourself think that Africa and Chine required European help, when in fact they were content to lead their lives with minimal outside interference. Besides, if you want to claim how whites invented everything, then you’re also going to have to own up to how whites have the in-born tendency to destroy what the create.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    Corvinus...." , race baiters such as yourself think that Africa and Chine required European help, when in fact they were content to lead their lives with minimal outside interference."

    Yours is a sub-species of the Noble Savage, that is your childish 'social construct.' Actually it is a liberal and naive construct not socially constructed in any true sense, but the construct of Jews like Ghoul, Montagu, Lewontin, Boaz, and on and on, the jewish joke, "We are all Equal" except nasty Whites.

    If you think these holy places like China and Africa were content to snooze along and dance around their own May Poles, you are ignorant of reality.

    slavery was and is everywhere in these places. The Amerindian was a great slaver, torturer, etc and the research today into actual injun behavior in S. America shows them to be carrying on the same great tradition of mayhem...like in Gibson's Apocalypto, the movie that told the Truth about S. America ( and how the injuns ran from Christ and preferred the Jungle.)

    Whites are not Perfect in some kind dopey liberal way, but we have invented free speech, rule of law, and a somewhat democratic attitude toward ourselves...both talented and untalented try to coexist on the basis of love, not merit. There is no other race with this mentality. It is all Oriental Despotism except for Whites. We also have the individual ability to look at our own individual sins, and no other race has that ability. Every other race ...their individuals...cannot look at themselves critically. They are un-evolved.

    The exception to this rule is that many Whites refuse to look at their sin of Projection of Goodness onto Others who in no way deserve it. It is the contemporary God is Dead deal, God or Other races cannot be Dead or as Bad as you , the White Nationalist, say. You are a Very Bad Man for saying these awful things about other races. You must be a White Debil, a Racist! etc.

    (In fact, White altruism has become a self-destructive, pathological altruism...directed toward other races who merely cash in on our altruism and will kill us off whenever they get the chance, except the Jews who are too few...16 million or so, who need to keep us alive as goyim, cattle...to support them in the manner to which they have become accustomed recently.)

    Our relatively democratic temperment is a remarkable achievement, unmet and not even recognized as possible by the benighted of the planet, Chink , or otherwise.

    The Darker races will never be "humane" the way Whites are. It is not in their genes.
    Your nobel savage is a liberal nutty-altruistic construct, based on White altruistic psychology, not historiography, anthropology, or socio-biology.

    Don Quixote, your darkie princess is a whore, actually much worse, a murderer looking for a mark.
    You are a mark.
    Joe Webb
  143. @Ragno
    Great. That makes one.

    Why, on sites like this one, do we only hear from Jews who "agree with us" but only to defuse looming/potential criticism of your own? Were you about to post a much longer screed exhibiting rancor and disgust at the 90+% of your co-religionists who are currently paving over Western Civilization with the magical curative of tikkun olam? Or are we about to go 'round the mulberry bush again, playing it's a race/ no, it's a religion/ no, you're both anti-Semites!, because frankly that is one seriously tiresome parlor game, and I no longer wish to play.

    Hey - relax. Just funnin' you. I've been reading Fred for a decade plus now and I assure you - nothing on this Earth, up to and including massacre sites with Stars of David burned permanently into the earth left behind as a calling card, could ever get Fred to point a finger at the Tribe. From a Jewish perspective, he's the ideal white conservative: it's the blacks or it's the Muslims and/or it's the white politicians; end of story. As far as he's concerned, cui bono is one of Cher's in-laws.

    Ragno, that is one comprehensively brilliant post.
    Expect to be excoriated by the usual suspects.
    And remember that’s a badge of honour…

    Read More
  144. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    True, to a degree. It's not the same as ten or twenty years ago. The Internet has allowed more voices to come through. In addition, the changing demographics have forced more and more people to face reality. However, that being said, the powers than be remain pretty firmly in control, if not quite as much as before.

    Will things change? Well, they always do, I suppose. The question remains how quickly and will my people still exist in any reasonable form when it does. I'm not to hopeful. I grew up in a rural area but now live in the DC suburbs. I know both worlds. My childhood home seems generally oblivious to what's going on. Sure, they recognize that Hispanics are becoming a greater part of the population, but they're is still no feeling racial solidarity and a desire to protect their heritage.

    I understand the conundrum. They don't hate Hispanics. (They do hate blacks.) They don't want to beat up some guy because he's Mexican. However, he is different, and they wish that he wasn't there. His presence - and the presence of more and more of his kind - is slowly destroying their world. It's not enough to incite violence, but the lack of violence leads to their destruction. In a sense, they need to be racialized. And the very difficult part of that is violence against a person who in a sense doesn't deserve it.

    A nice Hispanic family moves into the neighborhood. They're decent enough people. But there presence may push more Hispanic families - ones not quite so decent - to move into your neighborhood. Over time, the neighborhood turns into a Barrio because of that first, nice family. It's better to kill the baby in the crib. You have to be violent against good people to preserve your neighborhood. It's a history lesson that whites - because of their success for the past 500 years - have forgotten. Other races understand that in their bones. We don't. It's a genetic fault of ours. Either we adapt, or we will disappear.

    Get out of the Washington metro area. It’s toast.

    And people don’t believe what’s going on around them because they find audio-visual ‘entertainment’ (propaganda) more compelling. Criticise the jews all you want (not saying you did), but they early on recognised the power of that medium and got there first (well, almost first) with the most, and now essentially run the show.

    Read More
  145. @Anonymous
    Yes, white southerners should be left alone. But where are these same white southerners when it comes to leaving Iraqis alone. Or Afgahnis, or Russians, or Chinese, or etc etc.

    If these white southerners want to be left alone so much, why don't they first work on leaving the rest of the world alone too?

    You simply have to consider their sources of information.

    If your enemy creates your truth, you are a slave.

    Read More
  146. @The Albino Sasquatch
    "Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race"
    Actually Corvinus it doesn't. That's why you don't hear about the Wichita Massacre, the Knoxville 5 or Antonio West - a 13 month old infant shot dead by two African Americans. No, it wasn't a hate crime, of course it wasn't. I bet you didn't hear about Allen Coon either, set alight by two African American attackers who said "this is what you get white boy" No it wasn't a hate crime, of course it wasn't. This was just a short time before Trayvon mania - which of course we ALL know about it. That's just a short list - either way makes no difference to you, does it? White lives don't matter. Black lies do. Now all join - let's hear it again and again and again - Trayvon Trayvon Trayvon Trayvon Michael Brown Michael Brown Michael Brown Michael Brown, Freddie Gray Freddie Gray Freddie Gray - and a medley for Eric Garner. Hands up don't shoot. Black lives matter. Hands up don't shoot eh? Didn't do much for Dillon Taylor did it? White, unarmed, shot dead. Didn't hear about that one did you? No but we all know who shot Michael Brown, in fact, we'll never be allowed to hear the end of it.
    You hateful moron.

    …and of course nobody cares about Johnathan Foster, the little white boy who was burnt to death with a blow torch.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtZPrA0rwLI

    http://abc13.com/archive/9220368/

    It seems white people do not care when other white people’s little children are brutally murdered by a black.
    This criminal activity was covered regardless of race exactly where?

    Has anybody heard about this “local” incident?

    The other way around it would have been international news for weeks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    "The other way around it would have been international news for weeks."

    http://thegrio.com/2014/01/29/white-west-virginia-man-kills-innocent-black-neighbors/

    In the real world, probably not.
  147. @Corvinus
    GREAT song, Wyrd, but you have not defined "white".

    "That’s why you don’t hear about the Wichita Massacre, the Knoxville 5 or Antonio West – a 13 month old infant shot dead by two African Americans."

    I don't live in Wichita or Knoxville. They are local incidents. And a Google search of those incidents clearly demonstrate they were reported by the media.

    I don’t live in Winchester or Knoxville either, nor in Ferguson, Baltimore or the like.

    So can you explain why T.Martin and Michael Brown are on the News in Europe? A black thug gets killed by a white policeman and it is world news. Innocent whites get tortured to death by blacks, no one cares.
    That you don’t care does not wonder me, but that whites get upset when you point it out to them…

    The handful of white males that want to start fighting back won’t amount to a hill of beans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kyle McKenna
    He knows full well that everything you are saying is accurate, Marylou. He's just trolling here.
  148. @Anon
    I hear ya.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cQNkIrg-Tk

    Stupid song.

    They might shoot the last doe out of season to feed their faces, and then what?
    An Amish boy might survive, but the country boys will be down on them soon when their grub runs out.

    Sorry, not impressed with the country boys.

    Read More
  149. @Bill Jones
    The problem is that the State is in the marriage business because it treats single and married people differently.

    Exactly, and to an obscene degree. Which is why the State shouldn’t be in the business either. It should be a private contract between individuals, if that.

    Read More
  150. @marylou
    I don't live in Winchester or Knoxville either, nor in Ferguson, Baltimore or the like.

    So can you explain why T.Martin and Michael Brown are on the News in Europe? A black thug gets killed by a white policeman and it is world news. Innocent whites get tortured to death by blacks, no one cares.
    That you don't care does not wonder me, but that whites get upset when you point it out to them...

    The handful of white males that want to start fighting back won't amount to a hill of beans.

    He knows full well that everything you are saying is accurate, Marylou. He’s just trolling here.

    Read More
  151. @jim sweeney
    The obvious, to me anyway, answer for is for Christian priest, ministers, reverends and other religious like Rabbis, to simply resign their civil authority to legally marry people. Let ALL marriages per se be performed at the local courts or some civil bureau. Then, religious MARRIED couples can go to their particular church/minister and have him/her perform a religious, celebratory service of their marriage. This is similar to the civil/religious practice in much of the world. Churches will then EXERCISE their religious rules of one man & one woman to which none may object. Parishoners only please and, if you're a gay couple, we don't exercise that way. I don't see any possible legal objection to that approach.

    It gets the churches out of marriage itself which, as we know, is just a contract. It keeps them in weddings however, especially religious weddings. It perfectly separates church from state and who can argue with that?

    I've argued this on my own site and, so far, nobody has even taken a shot at it.

    Try so it can be improved - thanks.

    Wait, this is news to me, and I’m philo-American… you mean to say that, in the US, the religious and the governmental aspects of the marriage process are performed at the same time? How does that even work? Does the Church issue your marriage license? Is the marriage even valid without a perfunctory religious seal of approval on it? I thought that it was standard practice all over Christendom (including the whole of continental Europe) to have something at the local mayor’s office or some other official (for the actual paperwork and some monotonous words to the blushing taxpayers) and then just have a religious ceremony at your convenience (at a later date even). Generally, you have the party right after the religious ceremony.

    Read More
  152. @Corvinus
    GREAT song, Wyrd, but you have not defined "white".

    "That’s why you don’t hear about the Wichita Massacre, the Knoxville 5 or Antonio West – a 13 month old infant shot dead by two African Americans."

    I don't live in Wichita or Knoxville. They are local incidents. And a Google search of those incidents clearly demonstrate they were reported by the media.

    I don’t live in Knoxville or Wichita either – or any other places where your patron saints were ‘murdered’ by evil, hating, racist whiteys. Trayvon, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Freddie Gray – we heard about it – and are still hearing about it for weeks & months and no doubt, decades to come. The media and race baiters such as yourselves love it, whipping up hatred and hysteria against whites. The fact that you had to google those incidents I listed proves my point – that is – when a hate crime is committed upon a white it is never a hate crime and is barely, if at all, reported. But – keep it up, one day this ‘black rage’ & hatred towards whites you revel in encouraging – just one day, come for you. And don’t expect any sympathy or reporting of it either.

    Read More
  153. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Fran Macadam
    Fred's on to it, too:

    "Washington is entirely in the hands of the arms manufacturers, of the Israeli lobby, of big pharma and ethnic lobbies and, well, anyone who bribes Congress. Elections are a sham, serving only to decide the division of the spoils for eight years. All decisions of importance are carefully kept out of the public’s hands."

    Managed democracy, inverted totalitarianism, Superpower. Political philosopher Sheldon Wolin describes it right and it's just what Washington has become. There's no accountability to the people.

    Corporations and government conspire to keep the public in thrall. Their propaganda and the suppression of critical thinking serve to promote an ideology which sees democracy as dispensable, an obstacle to what they consider to be progress. America is governed by two corporate controlled parties in which any populist candidate gets stomped on.

    http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=12550

    I love what you wrote, and I agree with you.

    Read More
  154. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Well said Mr. Reed, as the descendant of American colonists by way of the confederacy who fought for freedom against tyrannical edicts from on far I can attest that there runs in (at least) my blood and that of many of my family and friends a visceral revulsion for same. I believe that there is an only slightly less than overt program to erase my way of thinking and my personal history by way of eradication the artifacts of its construction one by one- a trend which appears to me to be accelerating like the proverbial snowball headed for hell and which is not welcome.

    We of southern background have a slow fuse but it is not easily extinguished and those who seek to ‘reconstruct’ us would do well to take this information to heart.

    Read More
  155. @marylou
    ...and of course nobody cares about Johnathan Foster, the little white boy who was burnt to death with a blow torch.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtZPrA0rwLI

    http://abc13.com/archive/9220368/

    It seems white people do not care when other white people's little children are brutally murdered by a black.
    This criminal activity was covered regardless of race exactly where?

    Has anybody heard about this "local" incident?

    The other way around it would have been international news for weeks.

    “The other way around it would have been international news for weeks.”

    http://thegrio.com/2014/01/29/white-west-virginia-man-kills-innocent-black-neighbors/

    In the real world, probably not.

    Read More
  156. “So can you explain why T.Martin and Michael Brown are on the News in Europe?”

    The media moguls in Europe believed those stories were important.

    “Innocent whites get tortured to death by blacks, no one cares.”

    That is observably false.

    “The media and race baiters such as yourselves love it, whipping up hatred and hysteria against whites.”

    The race baiters are the Al Sharpton’s and Steve Sailer’s of the world. I’m just here for the snacks.

    “…when a hate crime is committed upon a white it is never a hate crime and is barely, if at all, reported.”

    

Crimes committed against whites by blacks are reported daily in local, state, and national level.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wyrd
    "Crimes committed against people by youths are reported daily in local, state, and national level."

    FIFY
  157. @Corvinus
    “So can you explain why T.Martin and Michael Brown are on the News in Europe?”

    The media moguls in Europe believed those stories were important.

    “Innocent whites get tortured to death by blacks, no one cares.”

    That is observably false.

    “The media and race baiters such as yourselves love it, whipping up hatred and hysteria against whites.”

    The race baiters are the Al Sharpton’s and Steve Sailer’s of the world. I’m just here for the snacks.

    “…when a hate crime is committed upon a white it is never a hate crime and is barely, if at all, reported.”

    

Crimes committed against whites by blacks are reported daily in local, state, and national level.

    “Crimes committed against people by youths are reported daily in local, state, and national level.”

    FIFY

    Read More
  158. @Corvinus
    Joe, I do thank you for your effort, even if it was poorly conceived and executed. Your definition is (gasp) a social construct by virtue that it takes no consideration to any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. Besides, how is YOUR definition definitive compared to other people?


    "You can go to the bank that if Whites vanish, the world will return to some version of Africa and China."

    See, race baiters such as yourself think that Africa and Chine required European help, when in fact they were content to lead their lives with minimal outside interference. Besides, if you want to claim how whites invented everything, then you're also going to have to own up to how whites have the in-born tendency to destroy what the create.

    Corvinus….” , race baiters such as yourself think that Africa and Chine required European help, when in fact they were content to lead their lives with minimal outside interference.”

    Yours is a sub-species of the Noble Savage, that is your childish ‘social construct.’ Actually it is a liberal and naive construct not socially constructed in any true sense, but the construct of Jews like Ghoul, Montagu, Lewontin, Boaz, and on and on, the jewish joke, “We are all Equal” except nasty Whites.

    If you think these holy places like China and Africa were content to snooze along and dance around their own May Poles, you are ignorant of reality.

    slavery was and is everywhere in these places. The Amerindian was a great slaver, torturer, etc and the research today into actual injun behavior in S. America shows them to be carrying on the same great tradition of mayhem…like in Gibson’s Apocalypto, the movie that told the Truth about S. America ( and how the injuns ran from Christ and preferred the Jungle.)

    Whites are not Perfect in some kind dopey liberal way, but we have invented free speech, rule of law, and a somewhat democratic attitude toward ourselves…both talented and untalented try to coexist on the basis of love, not merit. There is no other race with this mentality. It is all Oriental Despotism except for Whites. We also have the individual ability to look at our own individual sins, and no other race has that ability. Every other race …their individuals…cannot look at themselves critically. They are un-evolved.

    The exception to this rule is that many Whites refuse to look at their sin of Projection of Goodness onto Others who in no way deserve it. It is the contemporary God is Dead deal, God or Other races cannot be Dead or as Bad as you , the White Nationalist, say. You are a Very Bad Man for saying these awful things about other races. You must be a White Debil, a Racist! etc.

    (In fact, White altruism has become a self-destructive, pathological altruism…directed toward other races who merely cash in on our altruism and will kill us off whenever they get the chance, except the Jews who are too few…16 million or so, who need to keep us alive as goyim, cattle…to support them in the manner to which they have become accustomed recently.)

    Our relatively democratic temperment is a remarkable achievement, unmet and not even recognized as possible by the benighted of the planet, Chink , or otherwise.

    The Darker races will never be “humane” the way Whites are. It is not in their genes.
    Your nobel savage is a liberal nutty-altruistic construct, based on White altruistic psychology, not historiography, anthropology, or socio-biology.

    Don Quixote, your darkie princess is a whore, actually much worse, a murderer looking for a mark.
    You are a mark.
    Joe Webb

    Read More
  159. correction, tried to add this…this crazy white liberal belief began without the later jewish corruption…in our Christianity of Universal Unitarianism of the early 18th C. Somehow, the stern Puritanism morphed into liberal Christianity and the dreamers of Transcendentalists like Emerson and Walt Whitman and then of course the True Believers like John Brown, today’s avatar of the White Liberal….kill whites to save negroes.

    Man is not a rational animal. All the evidence of Colored inferiority on every standard of Good Behavior….is Denied by “well-intentioned” liberals. Actually their well-intentioned behavior is childish and narcissistic. Look at me! I am Good! You are Bad if you disagree with me. etc

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  160. Wyrd–Crimes committed against whites by blacks are reported daily in local, state, and national level.

    “Yours is a sub-species of the Noble Savage.”



    Would you like to make a call? Hang up and try again.

    “but the construct of Jews…”

    Ah, yes, da Joos are behind everything.

    “If you think these holy places like China and Africa were content to snooze along and dance around their own May Poles…”

    You really need to go out and read books on the subject matter, my friend.

    
“The Amerindian was a great slaver, torturer, etc…”

    

So were Africans, and Europeans, and Asians. It’s called the human race. Ever heard of it before?

    “but we have invented free speech, rule of law, and a somewhat democratic attitude toward ourselves…”

    Whites also partook in the Inquisition, jackbooted African infants, and created nuclear weapons. Do you celebrate these accomplishments, too?

    “There is no other race with this mentality. It is all Oriental Despotism except for Whites.”

    You really need to brush up on your Chinese Dynastic government functions.

    “directed toward other races who merely cash in on our altruism and will kill us off whenever they get the chance…”

    That’s observably false.

    “The Darker races will never be “humane” the way Whites are. It is not in their genes.”

    Define “humane”. What are the metrics involved?

    “You are a mark.”



    That’s not my first name.

    “All the evidence of Colored inferiority on every standard of Good Behavior…”

    Define “good behavior”. What are the metrics involved?

    Read More
  161. “Wyrd–Crimes committed against whites by blacks are reported daily in local, state, and national level.”

    Technically-speaking, yes, but only in the same sense technically-speaking, Attila The Hun had an active, outdoor lifestyle. In other words, don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining.

    Read More
  162. for fools like Corvinus , no instruction will suffice. However, I suggest he look at American Renaissance (Jared Taylor’s) and just follow the News section for a week or so and see if somehow his bigoted mind that refuses new information can withstand the fire. I suspect it can and will luv the darkies even more. But…you never know. Sometimes people change. I did.

    New information….

    The metric, you idiot, is simple: friendly, civil, law-abiding, and intellectually alive to new information, and low crime, lots of children, and free speech. Also jew-free, except for guys like Unz, Gottfried and a handful of others willing to join the White race and refuse jew hatreds of mankind, especially whites. Corvinus is a jew lawyer. Define Jew. Any metric but jewish.

    And finally I hope,

    Since the person who confided in me is dead, and the person confided about is pretty tough, and can deny it if he wants to, Michael Levin of New York City and City College I think (Why Race Matters, his book) said: “You whites would be entirely within your rights to expel us Jews cuz of our anti-white behavior.”

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  163. speaking of slavery, Whites are the only people as a race that outlawed it starting in England with Christians. We still are the only race that has no slavery.

    I suppose that Israel has no slaves, but it has lots of sex trafficking with espec women from East Europe, or so I hear. Then the Palestinians are not really slaves are they…?

    Whites invented everything, never enslaved our women, gave them the vote (doubtless a mistake), save the whales and dolphins and now sharks, invented liberalism and socialism, high literature and art generally despite the Jewish and modernist subversion of same which is fading out fast, and on and on, and crusade for saving the planet from one thing or another….soon it will be to save the planet from jew neocon wars, and on and on. Our brilliance and good physical looks are the best. Also we apparently have the best immune systems.

    Most of us whites are too Democratic to admit our excellence….too bad, as we are letting in the muds of the world, due to the Jews and liberals…1965 Immigration Act, etc.

    We also do 99 % of extreme sports, explored the world, got lots of balls for both….and are the most humane, send missionaries all over the world to save folks, while jews do none of the above but work to enslave everybody. It is all in the OT by the way. Read it and enjoy the mad Jehovah, the warrior god who wants Jesus murdered and burning in excrement for all eternity per the Talmud.

    Joe Webb

    yeah I’m an anti-semite and proud of it. If you are not, you
    are either a fool, or a coward or need to keep your job. (you are let off the hook for the latter)

    Jews are anti-everybody, the gen-u-whine haters of humanity, but nobody calls them on it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sunbeam
    " Also we apparently have the best immune systems. "

    Okay, I have never heard anything about this before. What exactly are you referring to?
  164. @fnn
    James La Fond is a veteran martial arts trainer who lives in Baltimore:

    http://www.isegoria.net/2015/07/propertiless-humanity-of-the-lowest-order/

    For instance, on the bus I am in Dodge, a policed coach with government recording devices abundant and in plain sight. And, in most cases, as soon as I get off the bus I am in Indian Country, surrounded by propertiless humanity of the lowest order.

    The absence of ownership, of being tied to a house, a vehicle, a law suit-friendly portfolio, or a garnish-ready wage, all makes a person more belligerent than they would otherwise be. The liberal slave masters have made of their urban slaves a ready force of aggressors. For they have tasted of abundance beyond the dreams of most working class people for two weeks of every month, and have also been deprived of a regular income, with monthly income distributions insuring times of want through the very lack of disciplined self-sufficiency denied the slave on the dole. Since a person raised on the welfare plantation is put in a position that weakens impulse control, inculcates a sense of entitlement only rivaled by medieval nobility, and at the same time denies property, he is uniquely prone to violent action of both the predatory and social variety.

    Therefore, unlike the savage Indian who had excellent impulse control, the savage urbanite is likely to engage in escalated anger-based combat due to perceived insults to his entitled status, making him a dueling or brawling risk on the order of a medieval knight. At the same time, his condition of moral want and social isolation make him a predatory threat due to his purposeful alienation at the hands of his duplicitous slave master. In one person the hoodrat represents the risk of being hunted by an aboriginal savage in his native habitat, and of running afoul of the belligerent medieval dimwit on the road to his drawbridge.
     

    LaFond is almost always worth reading. His characterization of “absence of ownership” as a defining quality of the urban feral is spot on. Whenever I get close to some kind of gnarly encounter I remind myself that they have nothing to lose, I have everything to lose. That will really tie a hand behind your back, but it’s the way it is.

    Really can’t recommend him highly enough.

    http://www.jameslafond.com/

    Read More
  165. @Corvinus
    “It’s a white thing, you wouldn’t understand.”

    Define “white” in the King’s English. We’re waiting...

    “However, with White homelands in Europe now being flooded with mud...”

    That’s observably false.

    “The Storm has begun and the crescendo will continue to rise and no one can stop it now.”

    Again, what are YOU actually doing besides bloviating on a blog? What kind of direct action are you taking? Elaborate.

    “This irrational belief or perhaps deluded hope that White people do not have a survival instinct will cause Rivers of Non-White mud blood to flow like a river.”

    There is little to indicate that your scenario will take place now or in the near future.

    “Young black men from all background are relentlessly pressured to engage in anti-social behavior, and too many of them succumb.”

    
No, they are not “pressured”. People make a choice. Middle and upper class black men have even more disdain for their criminal brethren. Unfortunately, similar to whites or Jews or Hispanics or Asians who have relatives or friends who are thugs, they don’t consistently and openly call them out on it.

    “Crimes against Whites will be swept under the rug.”

    
Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race.

    “You are the reason we are committing race suicide.”

    There is observably no such thing as “white race suicide” being committed.

    “Crimes against Whites will be swept under the rug.”

    
Actually, the media covers criminal activity regardless of race.

    Sorry, you don’t pass the Turing test.

    Read More
  166. @joe webb
    speaking of slavery, Whites are the only people as a race that outlawed it starting in England with Christians. We still are the only race that has no slavery.

    I suppose that Israel has no slaves, but it has lots of sex trafficking with espec women from East Europe, or so I hear. Then the Palestinians are not really slaves are they...?

    Whites invented everything, never enslaved our women, gave them the vote (doubtless a mistake), save the whales and dolphins and now sharks, invented liberalism and socialism, high literature and art generally despite the Jewish and modernist subversion of same which is fading out fast, and on and on, and crusade for saving the planet from one thing or another....soon it will be to save the planet from jew neocon wars, and on and on. Our brilliance and good physical looks are the best. Also we apparently have the best immune systems.

    Most of us whites are too Democratic to admit our excellence....too bad, as we are letting in the muds of the world, due to the Jews and liberals...1965 Immigration Act, etc.


    We also do 99 % of extreme sports, explored the world, got lots of balls for both....and are the most humane, send missionaries all over the world to save folks, while jews do none of the above but work to enslave everybody. It is all in the OT by the way. Read it and enjoy the mad Jehovah, the warrior god who wants Jesus murdered and burning in excrement for all eternity per the Talmud.

    Joe Webb

    yeah I'm an anti-semite and proud of it. If you are not, you
    are either a fool, or a coward or need to keep your job. (you are let off the hook for the latter)

    Jews are anti-everybody, the gen-u-whine haters of humanity, but nobody calls them on it.

    ” Also we apparently have the best immune systems. ”

    Okay, I have never heard anything about this before. What exactly are you referring to?

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    Sunbeam, not sure where I read it but I have seen the claim a couple times. It is cognate to our immune systems having been shaped by close living with farm animals, literally in the same house for a long time, more or less. This gave us an edge is resistance to disease vectored by animals, or so the argument goes....and then we brought small pox to Amerindians, of course, per the anti-fas, deliberately to kill off the injuns.

    Diamond, another Jewish liar, in Guns, Germs, and Steel I think makes this point about White
    s having developed immunities and then passing disease on to non-Whites. Diamond is another important jewish liar. HIs whole mission is to demonstrate that Whites conquered the world thru guns, germs, and steel, which is nonsense. We conquered it thru high intelligence, courage, and true grit, while jews were mumbo-jumboing in the ghetto subject to crazy rabbis who frequently poisoned their possible critics...anyway, it was all theocracy, just as said theocracy per the OT was passed to the Puritans and other Protestant groups, while The Church had discovered relatively democratic governance forms.

    It is arguable , per Cudahy (Ordeal of Civility) that the Jews have not had a tradition of relative democratic governance per White standards, and that they are still a few generations or more away from developing a 'democratic' temperment that can support an intellectual 'construct' of democratic governance. Israel as the only democracy in the Middle East is an historically naive position. Jews love military dictators, warrior gods and Big Men. another story.

    (As an heuristic device, think of Vikings a thousand years or Germans two thousand years ago and their elected chiefs per Tacitus, vs. Jews worshipping rabbis, bowing and scraping. Semites are natural born totalitarians...all of them, including of course the Arabs. The only race not collectivist/totalitarian are the Blacks...they are merely chaotic/egoistic, hence constant tribal warfare, dictators, etc. Arabs have a large component of this as well.)



    Speaking of things cognate, I am reminded of the Chosen People theme and its relationship with the Leninist vanguard party that fundamentally changed the socialist movement, largely white, to the communist movement dominated by Jews. True there was a tendency in the late 19th century socialist movement which could be called semi-Leninist...an intellectual tendency (Blanquist?..don't remember) but the hard core political Leninism came from the Jews, despite Lenin being not a Jew, but loving the Jews for their militancy, and of course, the social practice of Jewish women marrying gentiles in the communist movement is well known...Bibical Esther.

    I neglected to mention the Jewish hatred of Christians and the Church, which always shielded Jews from pissed-off peasants as much as it could. That resulted in the destruction of hundreds (?) of churches in Russia Rev. Yes, some of this can be traced to the French Revolution...and let us not forget the Cult of Reason, in which a French cathedral was taken over by the militants and the Goddess of Reason , a whore literally, was female of course, and pageants were re-enacted with a Reasonable Godlessness.

    So, it is not just the Jews but our own expressive individualism that contributes to relative anarchy, like the sexual revolution....the most devastating equality is sexual. A smart white can hook-up, as the term goes today, with a savage whose IQ deficit is 50 points behind the white fool.

    The Great Leveler...sex...back to the swamp. And who brought pornograpy, Freud fucknuts, and Frankfurt School sex revolution , Reich, Marcuse, etc....to us....what Freud called a plague. yup, gotta luv the Jews . (read Jeff Masson's book on Freud and his experience in the Freud Archive.)

    Jews have been the advance guard of Revolution for the last at least 150 years, and now lead the colored hordes to Europe and the USA...Kill Whitey!

    Joe Webb
  167. @Bill
    Ron Paul is not from Texas. Have you heard the man talk? Pittsburgh.

    I’m aware he grew up in PA near Pittsburgh. He sounds more Texas than Pittsburgh to me. (Western NY and PA are culturally Midwestern and I speak with a Midwestern accent myself. As far as Texas is concerned, admittedly I’ve never even visited there.) He’s lived in TX for many years and has been repeatedly reelected to the House by Texans. Certainly he’s no Northeastern liberal or moderate.

    Read More
  168. @Anonymous
    You say the issue is organization citizen, but the civil war proved that on prompting the south organized significantly quicker than the North. The true issue was availability of arms and production of ammo. The North was out maneuvered in nearly every battle, took many more losses than the south, Lee outwitted every Union general posed. The victory of the North was thanks to numbers and production of ammunition and goods. Don't get organization and supply confused.

    Confederate politicians argued among themselves about States’ Rights during the War. That was a factor in the Southern defeat. Also, Joshua chamberlain of Maine was a tactical genius at Gettysburg.

    Read More
  169. @Sunbeam
    " Also we apparently have the best immune systems. "

    Okay, I have never heard anything about this before. What exactly are you referring to?

    Sunbeam, not sure where I read it but I have seen the claim a couple times. It is cognate to our immune systems having been shaped by close living with farm animals, literally in the same house for a long time, more or less. This gave us an edge is resistance to disease vectored by animals, or so the argument goes….and then we brought small pox to Amerindians, of course, per the anti-fas, deliberately to kill off the injuns.

    Diamond, another Jewish liar, in Guns, Germs, and Steel I think makes this point about White
    s having developed immunities and then passing disease on to non-Whites. Diamond is another important jewish liar. HIs whole mission is to demonstrate that Whites conquered the world thru guns, germs, and steel, which is nonsense. We conquered it thru high intelligence, courage, and true grit, while jews were mumbo-jumboing in the ghetto subject to crazy rabbis who frequently poisoned their possible critics…anyway, it was all theocracy, just as said theocracy per the OT was passed to the Puritans and other Protestant groups, while The Church had discovered relatively democratic governance forms.

    It is arguable , per Cudahy (Ordeal of Civility) that the Jews have not had a tradition of relative democratic governance per White standards, and that they are still a few generations or more away from developing a ‘democratic’ temperment that can support an intellectual ‘construct’ of democratic governance. Israel as the only democracy in the Middle East is an historically naive position. Jews love military dictators, warrior gods and Big Men. another story.

    (As an heuristic device, think of Vikings a thousand years or Germans two thousand years ago and their elected chiefs per Tacitus, vs. Jews worshipping rabbis, bowing and scraping. Semites are natural born totalitarians…all of them, including of course the Arabs. The only race not collectivist/totalitarian are the Blacks…they are merely chaotic/egoistic, hence constant tribal warfare, dictators, etc. Arabs have a large component of this as well.)

    Speaking of things cognate, I am reminded of the Chosen People theme and its relationship with the Leninist vanguard party that fundamentally changed the socialist movement, largely white, to the communist movement dominated by Jews. True there was a tendency in the late 19th century socialist movement which could be called semi-Leninist…an intellectual tendency (Blanquist?..don’t remember) but the hard core political Leninism came from the Jews, despite Lenin being not a Jew, but loving the Jews for their militancy, and of course, the social practice of Jewish women marrying gentiles in the communist movement is well known…Bibical Esther.

    I neglected to mention the Jewish hatred of Christians and the Church, which always shielded Jews from pissed-off peasants as much as it could. That resulted in the destruction of hundreds (?) of churches in Russia Rev. Yes, some of this can be traced to the French Revolution…and let us not forget the Cult of Reason, in which a French cathedral was taken over by the militants and the Goddess of Reason , a whore literally, was female of course, and pageants were re-enacted with a Reasonable Godlessness.

    So, it is not just the Jews but our own expressive individualism that contributes to relative anarchy, like the sexual revolution….the most devastating equality is sexual. A smart white can hook-up, as the term goes today, with a savage whose IQ deficit is 50 points behind the white fool.

    The Great Leveler…sex…back to the swamp. And who brought pornograpy, Freud fucknuts, and Frankfurt School sex revolution , Reich, Marcuse, etc….to us….what Freud called a plague. yup, gotta luv the Jews . (read Jeff Masson’s book on Freud and his experience in the Freud Archive.)

    Jews have been the advance guard of Revolution for the last at least 150 years, and now lead the colored hordes to Europe and the USA…Kill Whitey!

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  170. @Anonymous
    Bullshit. You've paved yourself over. Did you give up meat? At least factory meat? Have a lot of children and grandchildren? Give up schools? Give up pharma and other vaccines? Give up artificial foods? Get out of the tax system, credit system, vehicle system, insurance system? When's the last time you pioneered some new ground?

    Nothing but a bunch of whinging baby boomers. A little peasant rebellion by arthritic gut heavy morons.

    Nothing you posted in your response to my earlier comment makes any sense. It’s just random survivalist paranoia pretending to be something else.

    By the way, since you’re advocating washing your hands of everything but firearms as vectors of almost-certain pussification – did you know you’re on a computer right now?

    Quick! – cut off your hands before the contagion spreads into your brain, man!……whoops! Too late.

    Read More
  171. “Technically-speaking, yes…”

    All you need to do is stop right there.

    “However, I suggest he look at American Renaissance (Jared Taylor’s)…”

    Race baiter galore, aka the white man’s Al Sharpton? Thanks, but no thanks.

    “The metric, you idiot, is simple: friendly, civil, law-abiding, and intellectually alive to new information, and low crime, lots of children, and free speech.”

    Well, since you are unfriendly and not intellectually alive to new information, you don’t even meet your own definition.

    “Also jew-free, except for guys like Unz, Gottfried and a handful of others willing to join the White race”.

    Wait, being “humane” REQUIRES being “jew free”? And you want people to take you seriously?

    “Corvinus is a jew lawyer. Define Jew. Any metric but jewish.”

    Amazing how you are able to tell my race, ethnic background, religion, and occupation! (rolling of eyes).

    “We still are the only race that has no slavery.”
    “Whites invented everything, never enslaved our women…”

    You ought to conduct research on the sex trade and the unfortunate exploits by white men against white girls. You are an absolute fool if you truly believe the white race doesn’t engage in slavery today.

    “Our brilliance and good physical looks are the best…”

    An opinion, not fact.

    “Sunbeam, not sure where I read it but I have seen the claim a couple times.”

    In other words, you have no clue.

    Read More
  172. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @MarkinLA
    And you know what? They’re winning.

    Only because they have had control of the media and government. The government is in the process of overreaching every day. The media is starting to lose control.

    “THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN” is a phrase I never beleived I would witness in my lifetime become reality. My greatgrandparents were racist and told me I would see days like this. Hate and racism was buried with them. The people wanting to blast Stn.Mt. the largest monument in the world and prehibit our rebel flag should have let sleeping dogs asleep.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    what is Stn.Mt. ?

    Then there is the full scale replica of the Parthenon in Nashville built in the 20s I think.
    Liberal ISIS types will want to blast that as well. Sticking pins in dolls department. The question is whether Liberals got that from the Negroes, or that it emerged from their own childish magical thinking.

    Inasmuch as man is not a rational animal, whites too are vulnerable to tantrums and avoidance of reality.

    Joe Webb
  173. @Anonymous
    "THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN" is a phrase I never beleived I would witness in my lifetime become reality. My greatgrandparents were racist and told me I would see days like this. Hate and racism was buried with them. The people wanting to blast Stn.Mt. the largest monument in the world and prehibit our rebel flag should have let sleeping dogs asleep.

    what is Stn.Mt. ?

    Then there is the full scale replica of the Parthenon in Nashville built in the 20s I think.
    Liberal ISIS types will want to blast that as well. Sticking pins in dolls department. The question is whether Liberals got that from the Negroes, or that it emerged from their own childish magical thinking.

    Inasmuch as man is not a rational animal, whites too are vulnerable to tantrums and avoidance of reality.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  174. “We still are the only race that has no slavery/Whites invented everything, never enslaved our women…”

    JW, are you going to retract your claims?

    Read More
    • Replies: @nexus six
    GREAT song, Wyrd, but you have not defined “white”.

    Dude, anti-whites like you have packed the statute books full of anti-white race laws (affirmative action, quotas, set asides etc). If you want a definition of whites just go look up the definitions that your fellow anti-whites use when writing race laws.

    You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can either have your precious anti-white race laws, in which case you have to define us, or you can deny our identity, in which case you can't have your precious anti-white race laws. It's one or the other.

    Also, why are you concerned about defining whites? You should be concerned about defining the term "genocide criminal", i.e., someone who violates the genocide convention of 1948. Maybe you should look up Article 2(c) and ask yourself whether it is wise to promote, justify or legitimise the destruction of a group.

    If you steal something and get caught, telling the cops, "I don't believe in property" will not lead to your immediate release. The statement has no legal value. Same with genocide law; asserting that you don't believe in race does not lead to automatic dismissal of genocide charges. Whether or not you believe in race is immaterial.

  175. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @jim sweeney
    The obvious, to me anyway, answer for is for Christian priest, ministers, reverends and other religious like Rabbis, to simply resign their civil authority to legally marry people. Let ALL marriages per se be performed at the local courts or some civil bureau. Then, religious MARRIED couples can go to their particular church/minister and have him/her perform a religious, celebratory service of their marriage. This is similar to the civil/religious practice in much of the world. Churches will then EXERCISE their religious rules of one man & one woman to which none may object. Parishoners only please and, if you're a gay couple, we don't exercise that way. I don't see any possible legal objection to that approach.

    It gets the churches out of marriage itself which, as we know, is just a contract. It keeps them in weddings however, especially religious weddings. It perfectly separates church from state and who can argue with that?

    I've argued this on my own site and, so far, nobody has even taken a shot at it.

    Try so it can be improved - thanks.

    When Massachusetts gays began pushing for gay marriage back in the 70′s I thought they were shooting themselves in the feet. Believing what you suggest the most logical and certainly less divisive way to accomplish what they desired.

    As their idea gained some traction out my way I mentioned my idea to some of my gay San Francisco friends and co-workers and as I recall I was tarred and feathered by each and every one of them.

    Over the years I occasionally had the opportunity to voice this opinion to both gay and straight people and for the life of me I don’t recall ever getting a single nod of a head.

    I’m not big on what if’s but can you imagine the difference in our country over the past 40 years if your idea had been implemented? Or would the fundamentalists have gone to war anyway?

    Read More
  176. @Ragno
    Great. That makes one.

    Why, on sites like this one, do we only hear from Jews who "agree with us" but only to defuse looming/potential criticism of your own? Were you about to post a much longer screed exhibiting rancor and disgust at the 90+% of your co-religionists who are currently paving over Western Civilization with the magical curative of tikkun olam? Or are we about to go 'round the mulberry bush again, playing it's a race/ no, it's a religion/ no, you're both anti-Semites!, because frankly that is one seriously tiresome parlor game, and I no longer wish to play.

    Hey - relax. Just funnin' you. I've been reading Fred for a decade plus now and I assure you - nothing on this Earth, up to and including massacre sites with Stars of David burned permanently into the earth left behind as a calling card, could ever get Fred to point a finger at the Tribe. From a Jewish perspective, he's the ideal white conservative: it's the blacks or it's the Muslims and/or it's the white politicians; end of story. As far as he's concerned, cui bono is one of Cher's in-laws.

    Bingo. I’m glad there’s one Jew that doesn’t want to meddle, corrupt and agitate. The other 99% need to be dealt with. Oh I know, were supposed to not notice these things but, I’m in my 20s and have no holocaust guilt. Just another event in human history full of shittee events. And I agree that as a people we’re waking up. I see it every day. But, the tipping point isn’t here yet as many of us are still too comfortable. When we’re no longer comfortable, things will jump off. Hopefully, starting with the head of MTV whom I’m sure is a Buddhist.

    Read More
  177. @Corvinus
    “We still are the only race that has no slavery/Whites invented everything, never enslaved our women…”

    JW, are you going to retract your claims?

    GREAT song, Wyrd, but you have not defined “white”.

    Dude, anti-whites like you have packed the statute books full of anti-white race laws (affirmative action, quotas, set asides etc). If you want a definition of whites just go look up the definitions that your fellow anti-whites use when writing race laws.

    You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can either have your precious anti-white race laws, in which case you have to define us, or you can deny our identity, in which case you can’t have your precious anti-white race laws. It’s one or the other.

    Also, why are you concerned about defining whites? You should be concerned about defining the term “genocide criminal”, i.e., someone who violates the genocide convention of 1948. Maybe you should look up Article 2(c) and ask yourself whether it is wise to promote, justify or legitimise the destruction of a group.

    If you steal something and get caught, telling the cops, “I don’t believe in property” will not lead to your immediate release. The statement has no legal value. Same with genocide law; asserting that you don’t believe in race does not lead to automatic dismissal of genocide charges. Whether or not you believe in race is immaterial.

    Read More
  178. “Dude, anti-whites like you have packed the statute books full of anti-white race laws (affirmative action, quotas, set asides etc). If you want a definition of whites just go look up the definitions that your fellow anti-whites use when writing race laws.”

    Why is it so damn hard for people here to define “white”?

    “You should be concerned about defining the term “genocide criminal””

    That’s easy…the deliberate killing, i.e. physical murder, of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.

    “or you can deny our identity…”

    How can I “deny your identity” when you fail to specifically list the criteria as what constitutes “white”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @nexus six
    "Why is it so damn hard for people here to define “white”?"

    Because saying people of European descent or some such is not as entertaining as rubbing your face in your antiwhite hypocrisy.

    "“You should be concerned about defining the term “genocide criminal”” That’s easy…the deliberate killing, i.e. physical murder, of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation."

    Just like you are pretending you don't know what white people are, here you are pretending that you don't know what a genocide criminal is. And just as you can go ask your fellow antiwhites for your definition of white, you can likewise ask them to explain genocide. Try this:

    "Hi antiwhite genocide criminal (or whatever you call yourselves in private), can you please tell me whether if Hitler had taken all the male jews and sent them to one African country and then all the females to another, would that have been genocide?"

    And your antiwhite genocide criminal friends would then start screaming that yes yes yes it is genocide!! Of course it is! You are creating conditions that will lead to the extinction of the group!! They will then further explain that:

    1. Mass murder and genocide are distinct (for example 9/11 was mass murder but not genocide whereas if you chemically sterilize a population it is genocide but not mass murder)

    2. Genocide is not a matter of opinion; the word was invented in the 1940s for the purpose of the creating a law against it (the Genocide Convention of 1948) and as such the legal definition is the only definition. There is no other definition.

    3. The legal definition of genocide is in Articles 2(a) to 2(e). You mentioned mass killing which is 2(a) but then (surprise surprise) you conveniently forgot that there is 2(b) , 2(c), 2(d) and 2(e). Separating male and female jews into two countries would be an Article 2(c) genocide.

    Mass immigration plus forced integration is the formula for white genocide. Like the jewish example above white genocide is an Article 2(c) genocide and for the same reason. A genocide criminal is therefore:

    An individual who promotes, justifies or legitimizes mass immigration and forced integration.

    And, may I remind, claiming you don't believe in race or in one race (or as is the case here pretending that you don't) is not a defense against genocide charges. Are you now beginning to see why you should be more concerned about the definition of genocide criminal than that of whites? Or do I have to rub your face in it a third time?

  179. @Corvinus
    “Dude, anti-whites like you have packed the statute books full of anti-white race laws (affirmative action, quotas, set asides etc). If you want a definition of whites just go look up the definitions that your fellow anti-whites use when writing race laws.”

    Why is it so damn hard for people here to define “white”?


    “You should be concerned about defining the term “genocide criminal””

    That’s easy…the deliberate killing, i.e. physical murder, of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.


    “or you can deny our identity…”

    How can I “deny your identity” when you fail to specifically list the criteria as what constitutes “white”?

    “Why is it so damn hard for people here to define “white”?”

    Because saying people of European descent or some such is not as entertaining as rubbing your face in your antiwhite hypocrisy.

    ““You should be concerned about defining the term “genocide criminal”” That’s easy…the deliberate killing, i.e. physical murder, of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.”

    Just like you are pretending you don’t know what white people are, here you are pretending that you don’t know what a genocide criminal is. And just as you can go ask your fellow antiwhites for your definition of white, you can likewise ask them to explain genocide. Try this:

    “Hi antiwhite genocide criminal (or whatever you call yourselves in private), can you please tell me whether if Hitler had taken all the male jews and sent them to one African country and then all the females to another, would that have been genocide?”

    And your antiwhite genocide criminal friends would then start screaming that yes yes yes it is genocide!! Of course it is! You are creating conditions that will lead to the extinction of the group!! They will then further explain that:

    1. Mass murder and genocide are distinct (for example 9/11 was mass murder but not genocide whereas if you chemically sterilize a population it is genocide but not mass murder)

    2. Genocide is not a matter of opinion; the word was invented in the 1940s for the purpose of the creating a law against it (the Genocide Convention of 1948) and as such the legal definition is the only definition. There is no other definition.

    3. The legal definition of genocide is in Articles 2(a) to 2(e). You mentioned mass killing which is 2(a) but then (surprise surprise) you conveniently forgot that there is 2(b) , 2(c), 2(d) and 2(e). Separating male and female jews into two countries would be an Article 2(c) genocide.

    Mass immigration plus forced integration is the formula for white genocide. Like the jewish example above white genocide is an Article 2(c) genocide and for the same reason. A genocide criminal is therefore:

    An individual who promotes, justifies or legitimizes mass immigration and forced integration.

    And, may I remind, claiming you don’t believe in race or in one race (or as is the case here pretending that you don’t) is not a defense against genocide charges. Are you now beginning to see why you should be more concerned about the definition of genocide criminal than that of whites? Or do I have to rub your face in it a third time?

    Read More
  180. “Just like you are pretending you don’t know what white people are”

    I’m not pretending, I actually curious as to your definition. I didn’t realize that you had the definitive definition compared to say anthropologists.

    “here you are pretending that you don’t know what a genocide criminal is.”

    Your diatribe aside, I just gave you a definition of genocide.

    “Mass immigration plus forced integration is the formula for white genocide.”

    Indeed! Whites forced the removal of blacks and Native Americans from their homelands in order to profit from their natural resources. Well, it’s too late to undo that past action. Besides, people have the liberty to choose if they want their society to have different groups of people around. Why do you hate liberty?

    “Are you now beginning to see why you should be more concerned about the definition of genocide criminal than that of whites?”

    No, because your definition is contrived.

    
Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nexus six
    "I’m not pretending, I actually curious as to your definition. I didn’t realize that you had the definitive definition compared to say anthropologists."

    Forensic scientists can establish race just by glancing at skeletal remains. If I gave you their definition, you'd just say forensic science is shit. If you are mixed race a geneticist can trace the exact percentage of your ancestors from Europe, Africa, the Americas etc. If I gave you the geneticist's definition, you'd just say genetics is shit. Same with the anthropologist's definition, you'd just say anthropology is shit.

    That's why I said you can find the definition in the antiwhite race laws such as affirmative action, diversity quotas, minority set asides and so on. You can't bring yourself to say that your precious antiwhite race laws are shit so it's a definition you have to accept.

    "Your diatribe aside, I just gave you a definition of genocide."

    Right, so the statutory legal definition of genocide, the only one that is relevant to anything, is dismissed as diatribe. The genocide convention doesn't conform to your antiwhite prejudices and therefore the genocide convention is shit. Am I beginning to see a pattern?

    "Indeed! Whites forced the removal of blacks and Native Americans from their homelands in order to profit from their natural resources. Well, it’s too late to undo that past action."

    Right. Thank you. Let's drop the mask and move on to justifying. Whites did bad things to blacks and indians therefore whites deserve to disappear.

    "Besides, people have the liberty to choose if they want their society to have different groups of people around. Why do you hate liberty?"

    Being for liberty means being for freedom of association and against forced integration. I'm all for it.

    "No, because your definition is contrived. 
Pro-race is code for anti-humanity."

    Anti-humanity no less! So being pro-race, i.e., being on the correct side of genocide law is anti-humanity? Right, just keep this up.
  181. @leper messiah
    I am waiting for the negroes to start shootin’ white folks. Bring it on Sambo. The liberals will never know what hit ‘em.

    About a week ago, a white woman walking with her boyfriend on Sunset Blvd in LA was killed by a black man who jumped out of a car, causually walked up to her from behind and shot her in the back of the head. No robbery, no beating, no rape....just a shot to the head and he was out of there. Apparently, there was a similar phenomenon that took place back in the 70's by some extremist black muslim group, all of whom were eventually caught.

    So...it is already starting to happen. Pay attention to see if other incidents like this take place in the near-medium term future (if these crimes are allowed to get by the standard MSM blockade of white-on-black racial attacks). I would bet this is just the beginning.

    you are talking about the Zebra killings I think. They were some kind of black muzzles who had to kill some whites for initiation.

    Interesting logic they had: you had to kill , say 5 white men, three white women or one or two white kids. Killing the kids showed you had real black balls.

    As I recall, statewide in CA abut 70 killings of Whites. There would have been more but the negroids only had a .32 . As I recall , they shot Art Agnos, a politician in SF…in the back and he did not even notice it till later.

    They also went in for mayhem, torture.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  182. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    I was with you until you started blaming the Israeli lobby for our woes. If there is any country that has faced continual attack from those who would destroy it, it is Israel. So forget your latent anti-Semitism and continue to talk about the things that you understand. In the long run, Israel is on the side of the common folks.

    Read More
  183. @Corvinus
    “Just like you are pretending you don’t know what white people are”

    I’m not pretending, I actually curious as to your definition. I didn’t realize that you had the definitive definition compared to say anthropologists.

    “here you are pretending that you don’t know what a genocide criminal is.”

    Your diatribe aside, I just gave you a definition of genocide.

    “Mass immigration plus forced integration is the formula for white genocide.”

    Indeed! Whites forced the removal of blacks and Native Americans from their homelands in order to profit from their natural resources. Well, it’s too late to undo that past action. Besides, people have the liberty to choose if they want their society to have different groups of people around. Why do you hate liberty?

    “Are you now beginning to see why you should be more concerned about the definition of genocide criminal than that of whites?”

    No, because your definition is contrived.


    
Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    “I’m not pretending, I actually curious as to your definition. I didn’t realize that you had the definitive definition compared to say anthropologists.”

    Forensic scientists can establish race just by glancing at skeletal remains. If I gave you their definition, you’d just say forensic science is shit. If you are mixed race a geneticist can trace the exact percentage of your ancestors from Europe, Africa, the Americas etc. If I gave you the geneticist’s definition, you’d just say genetics is shit. Same with the anthropologist’s definition, you’d just say anthropology is shit.

    That’s why I said you can find the definition in the antiwhite race laws such as affirmative action, diversity quotas, minority set asides and so on. You can’t bring yourself to say that your precious antiwhite race laws are shit so it’s a definition you have to accept.

    “Your diatribe aside, I just gave you a definition of genocide.”

    Right, so the statutory legal definition of genocide, the only one that is relevant to anything, is dismissed as diatribe. The genocide convention doesn’t conform to your antiwhite prejudices and therefore the genocide convention is shit. Am I beginning to see a pattern?

    “Indeed! Whites forced the removal of blacks and Native Americans from their homelands in order to profit from their natural resources. Well, it’s too late to undo that past action.”

    Right. Thank you. Let’s drop the mask and move on to justifying. Whites did bad things to blacks and indians therefore whites deserve to disappear.

    “Besides, people have the liberty to choose if they want their society to have different groups of people around. Why do you hate liberty?”

    Being for liberty means being for freedom of association and against forced integration. I’m all for it.

    “No, because your definition is contrived. 
Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.”

    Anti-humanity no less! So being pro-race, i.e., being on the correct side of genocide law is anti-humanity? Right, just keep this up.

    Read More
  184. “Forensic scientists can establish race just by glancing at skeletal remains. If I gave you their definition, you’d just say forensic science is shit. If you are mixed race a geneticist can trace the exact percentage of your ancestors from Europe, Africa, the Americas etc. If I gave you the geneticist’s definition, you’d just say genetics is shit. Same with the anthropologist’s definition, you’d just say anthropology is shit.”

Actually, I would trust more their expertise rather than your cursory knowledge on the subject.

    “That’s why I said you can find the definition in the antiwhite race laws such as affirmative action, diversity quotas, minority set asides and so on.”

    No, you cannot find the definition of “white” here.

    “Right, so the statutory legal definition of genocide, the only one that is relevant to anything, is dismissed as diatribe.”

    You asked me for a definition of genocide. I offered it. You then proceeded to go into some diatribe that “mass immigration plus forced integration is the formula for white genocide”.

    “Whites did bad things to blacks and indians therefore whites deserve to disappear.”

    Except that whites aren’t “disappearing” to the point that they meet the standard definition of genocide. They still breathe, work, and procreate in America.

    “Being for liberty means being for freedom of association and against forced integration. I’m all for it.”



    We have that in America. You are freely able to associate with anyone. If a white family chooses to sell their home to a black family in an all white neighborhood, that family has the liberty to make that choice. If you want to live in an all-white neighborhood, you can.

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nexus six
    "“Forensic scientists can establish race just by glancing at skeletal remains. If I gave you their definition, you’d just say forensic science is shit." Actually, I would trust more their expertise rather than your cursory knowledge on the subject."

    Thank you for conceding that forensic science is real and that races exist. It logically follows that you also accept the existence of whites and, by extension, your status as an antiwhite.

    "“Right, so the statutory legal definition of genocide, the only one that is relevant to anything, is dismissed as diatribe.” You asked me for a definition of genocide. I offered it. You then proceeded to go into some diatribe that “mass immigration plus forced integration is the formula for white genocide”."

    Except when dealing with law and statutes there isn't "a" definition, there is "the" legal definition, period. I cannot imagine a single practical reason why anyone would manufacture personal ad hoc definitions for crimes. Not one.

    (Ok, there is one, and only one, reason somebody would do so: it can work as a feeble attempt on the part of a criminal to pretend that he/she committed the crime accidentally because, "silly me I had no idea it was a crime!")

    "“Whites did bad things to blacks and indians therefore whites deserve to disappear.” Except that whites aren’t “disappearing” to the point that they meet the standard definition of genocide. They still breathe, work, and procreate in America."

    Yes let's continue to pretend that we don't understand genocide law even though it has already been explained to you (the "diatribe"). Let's pretend that a genocide occurs only after the last member of a group expires. Let's also ignore that the genocide convention says "in whole or in part". Hey, while we're at it let's even throw in "meet the standard definition of genocide" as if there were two standards, the legal standard and this new thing, "the standard definition", also known as CIFSSDA (Corvinus is fabricating self serving definitions again).

    "“Being for liberty means being for freedom of association and against forced integration. I’m all for it.”

 We have that in America. You are freely able to associate with anyone. If a white family chooses to sell their home to a black family in an all white neighborhood, that family has the liberty to make that choice. If you want to live in an all-white neighborhood, you can."

    Ooops you made a typo! You accidentally used the words chooses, liberty and choice. It should read: "If a white family IS OBLIGED UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT to sell their home to a black family in an all white neighborhood, that family has the COMPULSION UNDER FEDERAL LAW to make that FORCED CHOICE."

    "Pro-race is code for anti-humanity."

    Is that your slogan? So you make an effort to pretend that you don't know anything about genocide law (not a very credible effort but still.. an effort), and then you void your efforts by conceding with a silly slogan? If you're trying to pretend you're not a genocide fanatic, implying that genocide resisters are inhuman or anti-human is not exactly clever now is it?

    So, to recap. You concede you're anti-white (via honest admission), you concede you're pro-genocide (via stupid slogan) but you still insist that denying freedom of association and forced integration is liberty. You really think you can carry this argument? Come on. How about giving us another shot of honesty?

  185. Looks like the other shoe has dropped.

    Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson are history in Connecticut. — Under pressure from the NAACP, the state Democratic Party will scrub the names of the two presidents from its annual fundraising dinner because of their ties to slavery.

    http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Democrats-drop-Thomas-Jefferson-and-Andrew-6400544.php

    Read More
  186. I live in the boonies of flyover country and there is all this talk of what may happen when us white hicks snap. But no one wants to speculate on what that might look like. It is too terrible to talk about, or rather too unrealistic to talk about. Violent revolution almost always is fomented by the ruling classes, I can’t think of one that wasn’t including ours, and including the civil war. We have no national tradition of armed rebellion and even our 100 million gun owners and 300 million guns would be no match for the police and military, with their weapons and training.

    IMO we should play by the rules for now, vote in Walker and then bolster the Tea Party for ’18. Stay in the political system and replace RINO’s with conservatives. We have Republican majorities in most state legislators. Let’s see if there are enough real conservatives to vote in conservative pols. We are close in the House.

    Third parties have never worked in America. Our only realistic option is to play by the rules at this point.

    I pray every day for God to save America, and more importantly for revival.

    Read More
  187. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    I'm glad to hear of your opinion. And, to be honest, I suspect (though I can't be sure, of course) that your opinion is shared by a large portion of American Jews, perhaps even a majority. I've had a lot of Jewish friends, and, for the most part, their views would fit in quite nicely with Fred and Steve Sailer.

    So, yes, technically, I should have written "Jewish elites." They are the ones leading the charge against my people, providing almost all of the funding, organization and intellectual firepower. (Granted, there are plenty of goys screwing their own over for Pokemon social status points, but the head leads the body so to speak.) However, that being said, the general Jewish population (my buddies) aren't lifting a finger to stop it.

    Since everything comes back to the Holocaust, it's a bit like a sympathetic German citizen lamenting the SS taking away their neighbor that they like to his death in a camp. Sure, they're against it, but I'm still dead.

    Whether you like it or not, your people is at war with my people. (Actually, it's not a war because one side isn't fighting.) I'm glad that you're on our side, but until the rank and file of American Jews start to push back against their leaders, you're just one of those Germans who said, "But we didn't know what was happening." Except, of course, in your case, you do know.

    I can only hope and pray that American Jews start to push back against their own leaders, if for no other reason than it's in their own interest. Their leaders' insane fear of some American pogrom is destroying the country that they live in. Remember, most American Jews are in the same boat as the rest of us. The brown horde creeps ever closer to their neighborhoods as well. (My Jewish friends absolutely hate blacks and South Asians. The Hispanics are too far away.)

    Jews, like Asians, only care about a few things, money and family. Whites care about the wider community they live in. I know very few Jews who do more than pay lip service to any social or political issues. The ones that do are uniformly liberal. Asians don’t pretend to care.

    We are probably doomed as a nation since we have abandoned our spiritual and cultural heritage to neo-marxists and their fellow travelers who are systematically ruining every institution and value that undergird America. Look at England, in a decade or so we will be them. This war we are losing is a spiritual one, not material. The 2nd Amendment will not save us after we lose the 1st 4th and 5th.

    Read More
  188. @Truth
    You foolish mortal.

    The confederate flag thing is another inflame and divert technique used to distract "high-IQ geniuses" such as yourself, as well at the "low IQ cretins" whom you constantly belittle, but in reality, more resemble, from thinking about more pertinent things: Such as logical solutions.

    The government did not stop the MK Ultra program because it didn't work, merely because there was less overhead simply disseminating the wanted information through a network of unpaid underlings, rabid with arrogance and self-pity.

    To Anonymous: Excuse me? Are you gaga or what? What does the South have to do with China, Afghanistan or Iraq? Are you nuts? The South-Hating Washington Establishment has got us into these conflicts. The South and Southerners have not more to do with it than any other part of the country. What a moron you are to even write such drivel.

    Read More
  189. @Corvinus
    “Forensic scientists can establish race just by glancing at skeletal remains. If I gave you their definition, you’d just say forensic science is shit. If you are mixed race a geneticist can trace the exact percentage of your ancestors from Europe, Africa, the Americas etc. If I gave you the geneticist’s definition, you’d just say genetics is shit. Same with the anthropologist’s definition, you’d just say anthropology is shit.”

Actually, I would trust more their expertise rather than your cursory knowledge on the subject.

    “That’s why I said you can find the definition in the antiwhite race laws such as affirmative action, diversity quotas, minority set asides and so on.”

    No, you cannot find the definition of “white” here.


    “Right, so the statutory legal definition of genocide, the only one that is relevant to anything, is dismissed as diatribe.”

    You asked me for a definition of genocide. I offered it. You then proceeded to go into some diatribe that “mass immigration plus forced integration is the formula for white genocide”.


    “Whites did bad things to blacks and indians therefore whites deserve to disappear.”

    Except that whites aren’t “disappearing” to the point that they meet the standard definition of genocide. They still breathe, work, and procreate in America.


    “Being for liberty means being for freedom of association and against forced integration. I’m all for it.”



    We have that in America. You are freely able to associate with anyone. If a white family chooses to sell their home to a black family in an all white neighborhood, that family has the liberty to make that choice. If you want to live in an all-white neighborhood, you can.

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    ““Forensic scientists can establish race just by glancing at skeletal remains. If I gave you their definition, you’d just say forensic science is shit.” Actually, I would trust more their expertise rather than your cursory knowledge on the subject.”

    Thank you for conceding that forensic science is real and that races exist. It logically follows that you also accept the existence of whites and, by extension, your status as an antiwhite.

    ““Right, so the statutory legal definition of genocide, the only one that is relevant to anything, is dismissed as diatribe.” You asked me for a definition of genocide. I offered it. You then proceeded to go into some diatribe that “mass immigration plus forced integration is the formula for white genocide”.”

    Except when dealing with law and statutes there isn’t “a” definition, there is “the” legal definition, period. I cannot imagine a single practical reason why anyone would manufacture personal ad hoc definitions for crimes. Not one.

    (Ok, there is one, and only one, reason somebody would do so: it can work as a feeble attempt on the part of a criminal to pretend that he/she committed the crime accidentally because, “silly me I had no idea it was a crime!”)

    ““Whites did bad things to blacks and indians therefore whites deserve to disappear.” Except that whites aren’t “disappearing” to the point that they meet the standard definition of genocide. They still breathe, work, and procreate in America.”

    Yes let’s continue to pretend that we don’t understand genocide law even though it has already been explained to you (the “diatribe”). Let’s pretend that a genocide occurs only after the last member of a group expires. Let’s also ignore that the genocide convention says “in whole or in part”. Hey, while we’re at it let’s even throw in “meet the standard definition of genocide” as if there were two standards, the legal standard and this new thing, “the standard definition”, also known as CIFSSDA (Corvinus is fabricating self serving definitions again).

    ““Being for liberty means being for freedom of association and against forced integration. I’m all for it.”

 We have that in America. You are freely able to associate with anyone. If a white family chooses to sell their home to a black family in an all white neighborhood, that family has the liberty to make that choice. If you want to live in an all-white neighborhood, you can.”

    Ooops you made a typo! You accidentally used the words chooses, liberty and choice. It should read: “If a white family IS OBLIGED UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT to sell their home to a black family in an all white neighborhood, that family has the COMPULSION UNDER FEDERAL LAW to make that FORCED CHOICE.”

    “Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.”

    Is that your slogan? So you make an effort to pretend that you don’t know anything about genocide law (not a very credible effort but still.. an effort), and then you void your efforts by conceding with a silly slogan? If you’re trying to pretend you’re not a genocide fanatic, implying that genocide resisters are inhuman or anti-human is not exactly clever now is it?

    So, to recap. You concede you’re anti-white (via honest admission), you concede you’re pro-genocide (via stupid slogan) but you still insist that denying freedom of association and forced integration is liberty. You really think you can carry this argument? Come on. How about giving us another shot of honesty?

    Read More
  190. post card from Menlo Park, CA, the home of the upper middle-class, techies, older money, very white, beautiful white children with blondeism dominant, and safe.

    So I stop in at a burger joint on the west side and am parking my big Dodge 2500 pickup in the parking lot, and in front of me is a red customized Mustang with a couple mexicans and a black very dude strutting around. Very unusual for Menlo Park which has no blacks but some mexers about as they do work.

    I should have realized there was a reason for the empty parking space…Blackness and Brownness.
    As I am careful manouvering my big truck, aforesaid Blackness representative circles me and comments on my parking job.

    When I get out, he tells me that if I touch his car he is going to beat my ass, which is unnecessary since the truck is parked already. Big blue eyed debil stimulating the already warmed up amygdala of said spade, probably due to drugs. The Mexicans say nothing (as they probably work at the burger joint). Also, my physical size and fitness is evident due to tank-top and shorts. I size the dude up and figure if he attacks it is a head shot, or throat shot if possible in defense.

    My manner is cool and the spade backs off toward his car, turning away.

    I go into the joint and call the cops. They come, but the car and spade are gone. However another unit pulls the mustang over a few blocks away. The cop with myself tells me about the “criminal threat” law, and that it is tough to apply in this case.
    If I ” touch his car” as a condition of his attacking me is the legal nicety which apparently makes arresting the spade problematic.

    Cops are supposed to call me back…am hoping that they found drugs, etc. , that the “unarmed black suspect” goes berserk and that the cops shoot him dead. Menlo Park gets on the map of cops killing unarmed black suspects.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  191. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Sunbeam
    "I’ve lived in Baltimore (an predominately black city) all my life and have yet to meet a white person who’s been beaten silly by black gangs."

    Yeah, right. Of course all the news items you see linked here, or just about anything on that World Hip Hop site, well those don't exist right?

    And you know you could just make a quick trip down to the police station and ask them. And my spidey senses are tingling... just where do you live in Baltimore? To use the parlance do you live in a SWPL enclave?

    "The difference is they tend to work, collectively, like the Borg in Star Trek Next Generation”

    As for this, I'm not really sure. Sure seems the way things work in the real world. Thinking back to college, I can't really say that any of my oriental or Indian professors seemed brighter or more clever than the white ones.

    But over time the numbers proliferated. Seems to me that you could make a game theory kind of thing with this phenomena.

    What's more powerful than a bunch of individualistic geniuses? A close knit tribe of pretty smart people that always, always choose what is in the interest of their particular group.

    Seems like a fundamental law of human nature to me.

    Please look up the definition of “oriental” and “Asian”. You’re discussing race related issues as though you have a clear and rational viewpoint. Yet you are being racist by calling someone “oriental”. In my opinion, people hating others based on race instead of respecting them for who they are is what will breed more hate.

    Read More
  192. Funny thing is that we both look at the same source, but I see thuggery.
    That thug need to be taken down now meaning her behaviour should not be tolerated or put up with by decent folk.

    Read More
  193. I would think that would be the reason to go back to ones kind and be happy with their ilk. It seems simple enough if one is tired of being made a scapegoat by ones enemies.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Fred Reed Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Not What Tom Jefferson Had in Mind
Sounds Like A Low-Ranked American University To Me
Very Long, Will Bore Hell Out Of Most People, But I Felt Like Doing It
It's Not A Job. It's An Adventure.
Cloudy, With Possible Tidal Wave